Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020-06-25 Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda June 25, 2020 - 7:00pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Commission Representatives* 5.Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6.Presentations/Recognitions 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of June 11, 2020 Council Meeting* b.Financial Claims* c.Spanier Conditional Use Permit and Variance for Property Located at 10580 Cain Road* d.Tobacco License Approvals* e.CSAH 101 & Stieg Road Turn Lane Improvements – Pay Request 1* f.Stieg Road Realignment – Pay Request 4* 8.Planning Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Preliminary Plat for Karineimi Addition* b.Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for Tavera* 9.Unfinished Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Hackamore Road Improvement Project Update 10.New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.COVID-19 Preparedness Plan * b.Councilmember Resignation; Declaration of a Vacancy* 11.Staff Reports a.Active Corcoran Planning Applications* b.Temporary Site Plan Amendment – The Stanchion Bar* c.Pandemic Response Update 12.2020 City Council Schedule* 13.Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.ci.corcoran.mn.us. Due to the COVID-19 health pandemic, the City Council’s regular meeting place is not available and is not open to the public. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D.021 the one or more members of the City Council may participate by telephone or other electronic means. Meeting Held Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions Call: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 815 4766 0164 Press *9 to speak during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. Video Instructions Click this link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81547660164 OR visit www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 815 4766 0164 Participants can utilize the Raise Hand function to be recognized to speak during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. Participant video feeds will be muted. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 4. Council Meeting: June 25, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commission Representatives Action Required: None – Informational Summary: The advisory commission representatives for the June 25th Council meeting are as follows: • Planning Commission: Jeff Dickman • Parks and Trails Commission: Sharon Meister Financial/Budget: N/A Options: N/A Recommendation N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: N/A CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes June 11, 2020 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on June 11, 2020, in Corcoran, Minnesota. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 13D.021 and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council meeting was held remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Present were Mayor Thomas at City Hall and present via telephonic or other electronic means were Councilor Anderson, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Dejewski, and Councilor Schultz. Also present were City Administrator Martens, and Administrative Services Director Beise. Public Works Director Mattson and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk were present via telephonic or other electronic means. 1.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Thomas invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 2.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor Thomas called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 3.Agenda Approval MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Anderson to approve the agenda as presented. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 4.Commission Representatives Mayor Thomas noted Planning Commissioner Jacobs and Parks and Trails Commissioner Christenson were excused. 5.Open Forum (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor Thomas invited residents to communicate telephonically during the Open Forum discussion and noted the public comment instructions. Administrative Services Director Beise indicated no persons participated in the public comment portion of the meeting. City Administrator Martens noted Parks and Trails Commissioner Christenson joined the meeting via telephonic or other electronic means at 7:02 pm. 6.Presentations/Recognitions 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of May 28, 2020 Council Meeting b.Financial Claims c.Test Well Installation – Pay Request 1 Council requested review of consent agenda items 7a. and 7b. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Anderson to approve consent agenda 7c. as presented. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) Council noted clerical error within Draft Minutes of May 28, 2020 regarding Council Motion and Roll Call on Absentee Voting as Councilor Dejewski voted Nay on the item. Staff noted the clerical error and will make necessary adjustments. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Anderson to approve consent the Minutes of the May 28, 2020 Council Meeting with modification to the vote on Item 9c. with Councilor Dejewski voting nay. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) Council discussed forfeiture and impound fees on 7b. Claims and if the City is reimbursed for the cost. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk clarified costs are reimbursed for towed vehicle s by the owner of the vehicle, however the City assumes responsibility for forfeited vehicles and would be Agenda Item 7a. 2 responsible for towing and impound fees of forfeited vehicles. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk also noted forfeited vehicles are sold at auction, and some costs are recouped through the auction sale. Council noted a clerical error within the Claims related to Metro West claim cover sheet. Staff noted the invoice was for multiple inspections and would work with the vendor on their invoices. MOTION: made by Anderson, seconded by Schultz to approve consent agenda 7c. with modification. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 8. Planning Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor Thomas invited residents to communicate telephonically prior to Planning Business discussion and noted the public comment instructions. No persons participated in the public comment portion of the meeting. a. Park Dedication Fee Update City Administrator Martens outlined the Parks and Trails Commission review of and recommended approval of the Park Dedication Ordinance Amendment. City Administrator Martens explained the Park Dedication Fees follow Minnesota Statute, are based on the adopted 2040 Corcoran Comprehensive Plan, and based on city assessor annual valuations. City Administrators Martens noted fee updates are a result of the addition of portion of boardwalk and planned trail crossing costs, reduction in population estimates from the 2030 to 2040 Comprehensive Plans, and increased land values. Council and staff discussed Park Dedication percentage of land amounts being updated to match the Subdivision Ordinance. Council and staff discussed individual park phases at City Park, with anticipated phases one and two completed by 2040, and equates to approximately $1,000,000. City Administrator Martens noted fees are currently conservative for future park construction. MOTION: made by Anderson, seconded by Schultz to adopt Ordinance 2020-405 Amending the Text of Title IX of the Corcoran City Code Related to Park Dedication (City File 20 -004). Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Dejewski to adopt Resolution 2020-43 Approving Findings of Fact for an Ordinance Amending the Text of Title IX of the Corcoran City Code Related to Park Dedication (City File 20-004). Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Anderson to adopt Ordinance 2020-406 a Summary of Ordinance 2020-405. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 9. Unfinished Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor Thomas invited residents to communicate telephonically prior to Unfinished Business discussion and noted the public comment instructions. No persons participated in the public comment portion of the meeting. b. Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds – Series 2020A Tammy Omdal, Northland Securities, reviewed the sale of General Obligation Bonds for equipment purchases and the water improvement project. Ms. Omdal reviewed costs associated with issuance of the Bonds, the term length, balances, and noted the pledge on the bonds comes from water utility revenue and property taxes. Ms. Omdal report the bond sale went extremely well, bonds were rated with historic lows, and included five bids, and low bid by United Bankers Bank. Ms. Omdal noted bonds were rated AA3 by Moody’s and indicates the strength of the City’s finances as very strong. Ms. Omdal outlined the true interest cost of .83% total debt service estimated on current rates when sale was accepted and equates to approximately $180,000 less in debt service payments than initially estimated. Council inquired about rates for current bonds due in October, and the possibility of refinancing as an option for some debt the City currently carries if rates remain low. 3 MOTION: made by Anderson, seconded by Dejewski to approve 2020-44 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds series 2020A, in the Aggregate Principal Amount of $1,950,00; Fixing Their Form and Specifications; Directing Their Execution and Delivery; and Providing for Their Payment. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) b. Hackamore Road Improvements – 30% Design Review Public Works Director Mattson recapped the agreement with the City of Medina and reviewed the Hackamore Road Improvement Project. Jim Stremel, WSB, presented a design review of the Hackamore Road Reconstruction Project. Council and Mr. Stremel discussed the width of the roads, trail locations, the wider turf boulevard, and turn lanes illustrated within the options shown. Council and Mr. Stremel discussed concerns of narrowing the road with the future development of Eagle Brook Church on the corner of County Road 101 and Hackamore Road , and the traffic effects of the entrance off County Road 101 and the exit to Hackamore Road. Public Works Director Mattson noted the feasibility study for Eagle Brook Church has been incorporated with the current design and mirrors the Hackamore Road Improvement Project. Council inquired about the status of the City of Medina in the project review. It was noted public comment from the public engagement process referenced trails on the north side and impacts Corcoran residents exclusively; and what benefit is Corcoran receiving for allowing trail location in Corcoran. City Administrator Martens reviewed potential components and cost impact to the City, developer driven costs that pay for improvements, with the main goal of no impact to taxpayers. City Administrator Martens indicated next steps would be determining distribution of project costs. Public Works Direc tor Mattson clarified the goal for today is to commit to the 30 percent design of the project with an agreement to split the cost 50/50, with the trail design having the most flexibility, and includes review of the best pedestrian mobility through the corridor and opportunities of development. Mr. Stremel reviewed the project will occur in three phases and has included public engagement through a virtual open house and an online mapping activity. Mr. Stremel noted the project is timely with other development occurring in the area to possibly share in costs. Mr. Stremel reviewed project costs, wetland impacts, potential funding sources, and cost sharing components. Mr. Stremel reviewed the next steps include Council review of options, finalize design of phase one, proceed to 75 percent design, refine costs, analyze funding mechanisms, define final trail alignment and complete plan for the entire corridor. City Administrator Martens noted Councilmember Bottema needed to exit the meeting at 7:53 pm. Council and Mr. Stremel discussed what the pavement width in Option Two in relation to Option One, curves of the road, resident use on the road for walking and biking, and potential snow plowing mobility issues. Council indicated option one was nicer for trails and wants something the City will be happy with for 30 years. City Administrator Martens indicated the contract with WSB was for one option to be designed. Public Works Director Mattson discussed different outcomes as decisions are made by the City of Corcoran and the City of Medina. Public Works Director Mattson defined how staff arrived at a recommendation between the two options and noted items reviewed include the cost factor, value- added benefits, and existing property owners opinion of not in favor of turn lanes or widening the road, resulting in Option Two more closely aligned with desirable factors and community input. Council inquired about Phase One and discussed the positive safety outcome with the additional lane and asked if Phase One and Option One could occur as one stage, and remaining construction in another stage. City Administrator Martens expressed a need for an explanation for the purpose of an additional lane for City of Medina discussions. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Anderson to approve street design layout Option Two and authorize WSB to proceed with the completion of 75 percent design with suggestion of support for Phase 1 in Option 1. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) 4 10. New Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor Thomas invited residents to communicate telephonically prior to New Business discussion and noted the public comment instructions. No persons participated in the public comment portion of the meeting. a. 2020 Fee Schedule Amendments City Administrator Martens noted the City Planning Fee per hour with an additional escrow required, adjusting the Park Dedication Fees for single-family and multi-family homes, and amending the per acre fee Water and Sewer Trunk Line Availability Charge for northeast and the southeast districts. MOTION: made by Anderson, seconded by Schultz to approve Ordinance 2020-407 amending the 2020 Fee Schedule; including the Park Dedication Fees. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, and Schultz Voting Nay: Dejewski (Motion carried 3:1) 11.Staff Reports a. Pandemic Response Update Director of Public Safety Gottschalk updated Council on current COVID 19 numbers in Minnesota, noted steady COVID-related expenses to date, and discussed the next phase includes managing staff exposure and officers exposed to COVID 19 in the community, review and monitoring and testing with potential for quarantine if necessary . Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the police department have been assisting the community and churches review what opening plans look like, continued support of community as businesses begin to open, and continued monitoring of safety within the City. City Administrator Martens noted Phase Three of the Minnesota Stay Safe Order begins which allows bars and restaurants to begin to open. City Administrator Martens noted Code Enforcement was re-initiated and scheduled to begin June 17, and a plexi-glass barrier has been installed in the City Hall front lobby. City Administrator Martens also requested authorization of closure of City Hall through June 26, with a City Hall opening plan to present to Council for adoption at June 25 Council meeting. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Anderson to extend the closure of City Hall through June 26, 2020. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) 12. 2020 City Council Schedule City Administrator Martens noted the proposed Tavera development is an item scheduled for the June 25, 2020 Council meeting and may be lengthy. Council and staff discussed public comment opportunity at the June 25, 2020 Council meeting. Councilor Bottema rejoined the meeting at approximately 8:50pm. 13. Adjournment MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 8:55 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk Agenda Item 7b. Council Meeting Date: 6/25/2020 FINANCIAL CLAIMS Prepared By: jrotz CHECK RANGE FUND #500 ESCROW CLAIMSAgendaItem: 7b. Paid toAmountProject name 500-20390$723.56WRIGHT HENNEPIN - Ravinia Street Lights 500-20420$264.29WRIGHT HENNEPIN - Bass Lake Crossing Street Lights 500-20470$7,793.92KOTHRADE, PHILLIP - ESCROW REFUND 500-20486($972.50)KOTHRADE, PHILLIP - ESCROW REFUND 500-20396$382.25LANDFORM - RAVINIA 4TH 16-004 500-20400$34.75LANDFORM - RAVINIA 5TH 16-015 500-20436$107.00LANDFORM - Pulte Encore Final PUD andFP 18-027 500-20430$1,251.25LANDFORM - Bass Lake Crossing 2nd FP, FPUD 18-035 500-20436$18.75LANDFORM - Pulte Bellwether 2nd Addition Final Plat and PUD 19-001 500-20469$18.75LANDFORM - Ravinia 12th FP, PUD 19-002 500-20469$18.75LANDFORM - Ravinia 11th FP and Final PUD 19-005 500-20474$69.50LANDFORM - ComLink Midwest CUP 19-011 500-20469$18.75LANDFORM - Ravinia 13th FP, PUD 19-012 500-20469$34.75LANDFORM - Ravinia 14th FP and FPUD 19-022 500-20482$34.75LANDFORM - Nelson Sketch Plan 19-023 500-20494$677.25LANDFORM - Corcoran Crossroads SP 20-014 500-20497$1,294.00LANDFORM - Kariniemi PP 20-016 500-20332$8,123.25LANDFORM - Tavera RZ, PUD and PP 20-017 500-20496$1,167.50LANDFORM - Spanier CUP and VAR 20-019 500-20498$917.50LANDFORM - Sign Variance at 9350 CR 19 20-020 500-20482$34.75LANDFORM - Nelson Trucking CUP, SP, VAR 20-022 500-20487$173.75LANDFORM - Eagle Brook Church PP, SP and CUP 20-023 500-20436$34.75LANDFORM - Bellwether 5th FP and Final PUD 20-024 500-20498$19.64LANDFORM - Sign Variance at 9350 CR 19 20-020 500-20436$104.25LANDFORM - Pulte Bellwether 4th FP and FPUD 20-002 500-20489$1,153.25LANDFORM - Paulsen Farm OSP PP 20-011 500-20488$34.75LANDFORM - Sawgrass PUD Concept 20-012 500-20487$436.25LANDFORM - Eaglebrook Church #20-013 500-20332$67.50WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Lennar Tavera Development 500-20480$1,072.50WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Nelson - Wetland Review (Nelson International Property) 500-20335$13,090.24WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - LENNAR - ENGINEERING 500-20376$234.20WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - PARK PLACE STORAGE 500-20438$2,029.04WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Bass Lake Crossing M/IHome 17-012 Engineering 500-20423$219.68WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Bass Lake Estates Sketch PUD 17-015 500-20474$379.90WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - ComLink Midwest CUP 19-011 500-20459$135.00WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Refuge of Rush Creek FP 18-028 500-20497$202.50WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Kariniemi PP 20-016 500-20436$14,198.87WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 500-20332$216.00WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Wessel Property Feasibility Study 500-20332$2,651.23WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Wessel Project Offsite Utilities 500-20487$5,207.60WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Eagle Brook Church #20-013 500-20490$3,812.60WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Cook Lake - Schommer 500-20491$1,131.00WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Paulsen Farms OSP 500-20332$19,215.68WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Lennar Tavera Development Total 87,832.95 Total Fund #500 = 87,832.95 See attached Payments Detail) ALL OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMSAgendaItem:7b.$ 640,361.12$ 728,194.07Total Checks See attached Check Detail Register) Total of Auto Deductions 169,390.41 TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL$ 897,584.48 Auto Deductions / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursements DatePaid toAmount 6/8/2020Zoom.us$ 16.11 Remote Meeting License 6/12/2020Northland Securities Wire Fee$ 12.00 Bond wire fee 6/5/2020ACH FILE FEE$ 15.00 Automatic sewer/water payment ACH fee 6/5/2020REVTRAK SV9T$ 519.43 Credit Card Fees forMay 6/5/2020ADP Wage Garnishment$ 542.77 Garnishment 6/5/2020Payroll Taxes$ 17,408.65payroll taxes 6/5/2020Net Payroll PP12$ 45,824.36Net payroll PP12 6/8/2020PERA$ 14,400.08Pension plan 6/9/2020Payroll Taxes$ 632.97 payroll taxes 6/9/2020State of MN - MSRS$ 2,117.29State of MN healthcare savings plan 6/9/2020State ofMN - Roth$ 2,289.21Deferred compensation payment toState ofMN 6/9/2020Optum - H SA$ 3,368.73Health savings account 6/11/2020US Bank Equipment Finance$ 317.00 Copier Lease 6/17/2020Payroll Taxes$ 21,992.82payroll taxes 6/18/2020Net Payroll PP12$ 59,391.22Net payroll PP13 6/18/2020ADP Wage Garnishment$ 542.77 Garnishment Total 169,390.41 H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\CouncilClaims\\2020ClaimsWorkbook.xls 10100FarmersStateBankUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-43100-225Landscape/DitchMaterialsE100-43100-417UniformsE100-43100-210OperatingSuppliesGENERAL)E100-42100-223BuildingRepairSuppliesE100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-417UniformsE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-223BuildingRepairSuppliesE100-43100-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-41941-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-45200-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E425-43100-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsG100-21709DependentCareFSAWithholdE100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E602-49450-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E601-49400-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-218InvestigationsE100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)Total CENTERPOINTENERGYHOUSTONTotal ADAMSPESTCONTROL, INC.Total AMAZONCAPITALSERVICES Total C.S.MCCROSSANTotal BEISE, JESSICATotal ACMETOOLSACMETOOLSCENTERPOINTENERGYHOUSTONC.S.MCCROSSANBEISE, JESSICAAMAZONCAPITALSERVICESADP,LLCADAMSPESTCONTROL, INC.Total ADP, LLC$194,162.68$1,368.60$236.75$116.94$121.33$116.94$121.33$501.10$114.89$249.99$105.50$37.99$42.73$24.10$87.40$72.28$24.10$34.00$20.45$92.70$45.98$1.58$6.71$15876338254053472982405347291740534728914053472850405285492440528549054052854904405285490340528548509884559-705-80000141143-80000141143-PAY 40618200618200618200618201GN9-9YJ3-77179G-7M9Q-D3128220765 7318SUPPLIESUNIFORMSPUBLIC WORKSFLOOR MATS - POLICECITY HALLUNIFORMSPUBLIC WORKSTOWELSFLOOR MATS - POLICENATURAL GAS BASIC 9100CORD 19NATURAL GAS - 5754460-3NATURAL GAS - 5754177-3Stieg Road Realignment 100% CompleteREIMBURSEMENTSREIMBURSEMENTSREIMBURSEMENTSREIMBURSEMENTSSUPPLIESSUPPLIESWORKFORCE NOW PAYROLL SOLUTIONS BUNDLEWORKFORCE NOW PAYROLL SOLUTIONS BUNDLEPEST CONTROLSUPPLIES06/18/205:06PMCITYOFCORCORAN194,162.68$1,378.47$342.25$555.55$364.88$83.97$92. 70 Page 1 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-41941-321TelephoneE100-42100-131EmployerPaidHealthE100-41400-131EmployerPaidHealthE100-41300-131EmployerPaidHealthE601-49400-215WaterMetersE601-49400-215WaterMetersE100-41941-219Covid-19CoronavirusE101-42100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E101-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-225Landscape/DitchMaterialsE100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41130-351NewsletterExpensesE100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41951-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41951-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41951-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-42100-321 TelephoneTotal COOPERATIVE PURCHASING CONNECTTotal COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHTotal CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATERTotal FERGUSON WATERWORKS Total FASTSIGNSPLYMOUTHTotal DOBOSZENSKI & SONSTotal ECMPUBLISHERSINCTotal COMCAST-INTERNETTotal DIAMONDMOWERSTotal CINTAS 470COMCAST-INTERNETHEALTH PARTNERSFERGUSON WATERWORKSDIAMOND MOWERSCULLIGAN BOTTLEDWATERCOOPERATIVE PURCHASING CONNECTCOMPUTER INTEGRATIONTECH$3,875.00$8,891.60$4,153.01$4,375.80$1,025.68$332.30751.06$639.60$362.49$100.28$100.28$300.00$105.04$571.00$648.56$776.00$595.00$332.30$38.45061020977806739778067304553690454913100-3625677893877893820001-0250178055-IN114X75819504061620061620061620294 381294211294090061020CITY HALL INTERNETHEALTH PARTNERS6/20 INVOICEHEALTH PARTNERS6/20 INVOICEHEALTH PARTNERS6/20 INVOICEMETERSMETERSPOLICE & CITY HALLAD FOR BIDSPOLICE & CITY HALLAD FOR BIDSOVERSIZE RUBBLE DUMP CHARGELANDSCAPE SUPPLIESOFFICE WATERPD PAPERNEWSLETTER PAPERADMIN/COUNCIL PAPERIT MANAGED SERVICE - MTHIT MANAGED SERVICE - MTHIT MANAGED SERVICE - MTHPD INTERNET06/18/205:06PMCITYOFCORCORAN5,246.00$5,015.40$1,025.68$1,324.60$727.15$362.49$200.56$300.00$664.60$38. 45 Page 2 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-42102-131EmployerPaidHealthG500-20496Spanier/ToplineCUPVar20-019E100-41910-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)G500-20332LennarWesselFeasibilityG500-20497KariniemiPP20-016G500-20494CorcoranCrossroadsSP20-014G500-20482NelsonSketchPlan19-023G500-20469Rav11-1318-040, 19-002 & 012G500-20469Rav11-1318-040, 19-002 & 012G500-20469Rav11-1318-040, 19-002 & 012G500-20469Rav11-1318-040, 19-002 & 012G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20430BassLkCrossFP, FPUD, 17-022G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20400Ravinia5th & 6thG500-20396Ravinia4thAdditionG500-20470RollingHillsAcresPP19-004R205-42100-36217SaleofAssetsR205-42100-36217SaleofAssetsE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-323 RadioUnitsE100-42100-301 PrisonerG100-20205 ReimbursementsG 100-20205 ReimbursementsE 100-45200-131 EmployerPaidHealthE100-43100-131 EmployerPaidHealthE100-42102-131EmployerPaidHealthE100-42100-131 EmployerPaidHealthE100-41400-131 EmployerPaidHealthE100-41300-131 EmployerPaidHealthG100-20205 ReimbursementsG100-20205 ReimbursementsE 100-45200-131 EmployerPaidHealthE100-43100-131 EmployerPaidHealthTotal HENNCOUNTYATTORNEYS OFFICETotal HENNCOSHERIFF-MC131 Total KOTHRADE, PHILLIPTotal HEALTHPARTNERSHENN COSHERIFF-MC131LANDFORMKOTHRADE, PHILLIPHENN COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE$6,922.87$1,167.50$8,123.25$1,294.00$1,251.25$7,793.92$1,331.49$1,058.82$1,767.53$6,922.87$8,891.60$4,153.01$1,058.82$1,767.53($972.50)$747.66$255.00$677.25$107.00$382.25$460.98$206.91$150.00$383.02$747.66$751.06$383.02$22.50$34.75$34.75$18.75$69.50$18.75$18.75$18.75$34.759778067330525305253052530525305253052430524305243052430524305243052430523305233052230522ESCROW REFESCROW REFDWIFORFEITDWI FORFEIT10001511471000151080977914129779141297791412977914129779141297791412977914129779141297780673977806739778067397780673HEALTH PARTNERS 6/20INVOICESpanier CUPandVAR20-019Tabor AgPreserve Expiration20-018Tavera RZ, PUDandPP20-017Kariniemi PP20-016Corcoran Crossroads SP20-014Nelson SketchPlan19-023Ravinia13thFP, PUD19-012ComLink MidwestCUP19-011Ravinia11thFPandFinalPUD19-005Ravinia 12thFP, PUD19-002PulteBellwether 2ndAdditionFinalPlatandPUD19-001Bass LakeCrossing 2ndFP, FPUD18-035Pulte EncoreFinalPUDandFP18-027RAVINIA 5TH16-015RAVINIA 4TH16-004ESCROW REFUNDESCROW REFUNDDWI FORFEITURESDWI FORFEITURESRadio Fees - PublicWorksRadio Fees - PolicePrisoner Fees - Booking HousingHEALTH PARTNERS 7/20INVOICE - SCHUTTEHEALTH PARTNERS 7/20INVOICE - HAMILTONHEALTH PARTNERS 7/20INVOICEHEALTH PARTNERS 7/20INVOICEHEALTH PARTNERS 7/20INVOICEHEALTH PARTNERS 7/20INVOICEHEALTH PARTNERS 7/20INVOICEHEALTH PARTNERS 7/20INVOICEHEALTH PARTNERS 6/20INVOICE - SCHUTTEHEALTH PARTNERS 6/20INVOICE - HAMILTONHEALTH PARTNERS 6/20INVOICEHEALTH PARTNERS 6/20INVOICE06/18/205:06PMCITYOFCORCORAN49,351.14$1,688.40$6,821.42$483.48 Page 3 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check AmtInvoiceComment UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid G500-20498MarathonVariance20-020E100-45200-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E602-49450-312MCESSewageTreatmentE100-41951-207ComputerSuppliesE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSuppliesGENERAL)E100-42100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E601-49400-310OtherProfessionalServicesE601-49400-310OtherProfessionalServicesE100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)G500-20487EagleBrookChurch #20-013G500-20489PaulsenFarmOSPPP20-011E100-41910-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20498MarathonVariance20-020E100-41910-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41920-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41910-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)G500-20436 PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20487 EagleBrookChurch #20-013G500-20482 NelsonSketchPlan19-023E100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)Total METROPOLITAN COUNCILENVIROTotal MIDWESTMACHINERY CO.TotalMENARDSMAPLEGROVETotal MAPLEGROVE, CITYOF Total MENARDSBUFFALOTotal METROSALESINCTotal LANOEQUIPMENTTotal LANDFORMLANOEQUIPMENTMIDWESTMACHINERYCO.METROPOLITAN COUNCILENVIROMETROSALESINCMENARDS MAPLEGROVEMENARDS BUFFALOMAPLEGROVE, CITYOF$19,702.00$11,779.00$2,86100$1,625.15$3,882.84$1,153.25$1,408.00$917.50$270.49$436.25$104.25$200.00$337.25$173.75$141.00$34.75$96.00$25.45$77.09$29.95$59.10$34.75$19.64$34.75$6.19$4.47305250001111145INV1607004657616571365663 652206516423014205102050903-75906030525305253052530525305253052530525305253052530525305253052530525Sign Varianceat 9350 CR1920-020PARTSMATERIAL TREATMENTSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUP PLIESSUPPLIESANNUAL CONNECTION CHARGEWATER SERVICE SEMI ANNUALSUPPLIESEaglebrookChurch #20-013Sawgrass PUDConcept 20-012PaulsenFarmOSPPP 20-011Park Dedication Fee Update 20-004PulteBellwether4th FP andFPUD 20-002SignVariance at9350CR19 20-020City MeetingsCode EnforcementCorcoranPlanningBellwether5thFPand Final PUD 20-024Eagle Brook ChurchPP, SPandCUP 20-023Nelson Trucking CUP, SP, VAR 20-022EncroachmentAgreementon70th 20-02106/18/205:06 PM CITYOFCORCORAN21,362.39$31,481.00$3,882.84$1,625.15$383.69$59.10$96.00$ 29.95 Page 4 Check Detail Register© June 2020 UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid R205-42100-36217SaleofAssetsE100-42100-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E601-49400-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41941-400Repairs & MaintCont (GENERAL)E100-42100-417UniformsE100-42100-208TrainingandInstructionE100-45200-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-45200-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41130-351NewsletterExpensesE100-43100-233AsphaltMaint/PatchingE425-43100-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsE100-45200-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-45200-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E425-43100-530 Improvements OtherThanBldgsTotal MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT & BUDGETTotal TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVETotal STREICHER SPOLICE EQUIPMENTTotal NAPAAUTOPARTS - CORCORANTotal OMANN BROTHERS PAVINGINCTotal MNDEPTOFTRANSPORTATIONTotal SITEONELANDSCAPE SUPPLYTotal NEWLOOKCONTRACTING Total THEUPSSTORE #1533Total POSTMASTERMINNESOTA MANAGEMENT & BUDGETWENCKASSOCIATES, INC.TRANSUNIONRISK & ALTERNATIVETHEUPSSTORE #1533TEGRETESTREICHERSPOLICEEQUIPMENTSITEONELANDSCAPESUPPLYPOSTMASTEROMANNBROTHERSPAVINGINCNEWLOOKCONTRACTINGNAPAAUTOPARTS - CORCORANMNDEPTOFTRANSPORTATIONTotalTEGRETE$290,655.12$1,150.00$335.10$380.00$369.90$120.58$990.13$47.05$50.00$10.32$74.99$44.57$24.01$80.79DWI FORFEIT3609221-05200000000506190481I1435429I1435078100247388-00100243228-0006172014452PAY 1296412296306P00011674DWI FORFEITURESERVICEWater Sample TestingMONTHLYCITYHALL CLEANINGUNIFORMSSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUMMER/FALL2020 NEWSLETTERASPHALT MIXCSAH 101 & STIEG ROADTURNLANE SUPPLIESSUPPLIESSTIEG ROAD REALIGNMENT06/18/20 5:06PMCITYOFCORCORAN290,655.12$1,150.00$335.10$380.00$444.89$167.63$990.13$80.79$50.00$10.32$68. 58 IMPROVEMENTS 98% COMPLETE Page 5 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check UnpaidUnpaid E100-43170-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsE100-42100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)G500-20332LennarWesselFeasibilityG500-20491PaulsenFarmsOSPG500-20490CookLake - SchommerG500-20487EagleBrookChurch #20-013G500-20332LennarWesselFeasibilityE425-43100-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsE425-43100-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsG500-20332LennarWesselFeasibilityE427-43100-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsG500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20497KariniemiPP20-016G500-20459RefugeofRushCreekFP18-028G500-20474ComLinkMidwestCUP19-011G500-20423BassLakeEstSkchPUD17-015G500-20438BassLkCRM/IHomeEngineeringG500-20376ParkPlaceStorageE427-43100-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsG500-20335LennarEngPlanReview/ModificE601-49400-303EngineeringFeesE602-49450-303EngineeringFeesG500-20480NelsonWetlandReviewG500-20332LennarWesselFeasibilityE100-43170-299WatershedLGUE100-43170-299WatershedLGUE100-43170-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E601-49400-303 EngineeringFeesTotal WESTSIDEWHOLESALETIRETotal WENCKASSOCIATES, INC. WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIREWRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECT$12,414.23$19,215.68$14,198.87$13,090.24$2,255.50$1,131.00$3,812.60$5,207.60$2,651.23$8,535.56$6,911.99$2,029.04$3,116.00$1,072.50$789.00$216.00$258.00$202.50$135.00$379.90$219.68$234.20$945.00$877.50$270.00$587.90$67.50$15.88$15.88$15.88$15.88$15.88$1588$15.88$15.17$15.88$15.17$30.00$20.00$28.42$30.00061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520860295860126860110859922061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520GeneralEngServicesBridlePath: 150-1691-0177Prairie/Bridle: 150-1691-0174Bridle/Bluestem:150-1691-0168Bridle/Steeple: 150-1691-01586471Carriage: 150-1691-0155Paddock/Bridle: 150-1690-5158BridlePath: 150-1690-5146PaddockLn150-1690-5137Bridle/Paddock: 150-1690-5135Bridle/Gleason:150-1690-5131SERVICESERVICESERVICESERVICELennarTaveraDevelopmentPaulsenFarmsOSPCookLake - SchommerEagleBrookChurch #20-013WesselProjectOffsiteUtilitiesCSAH101andStiegRoadTurnLanesStiegRoadDesignandConstructionWesselPropertyFeasibilityStudyCSAH116andGleasonParkwayTurnLanesPulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029KariniemiPP20-016RefugeofRushCreekFP18-028ComLinkMidwestCUP19-011BassLakeEstatesSketchPUD17-015BassLakeCrossingM/IHome17-012EngineeringPARKPLACESTORAGE66thStreetDesignandConstructionLENNAR - ENGINEERINGWaterEngineeringSanitarySewer - EngineeringNelson - WetlandReview (NelsonInternational Property)Lennar Tavera DevelopmentWCA LGUO'NEILL WCA VIOLATIONStorm Water - Engineering2020 SE CORCORAN TRUNK WATERMAIN06/18/20 5:06 PM CITYOFCORCORAN100,824.22$ 108.42 Page 6 Check Detail Register© June 2020 G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLights$15.88$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$18.76$15.1715.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$24.16$15.17$24.16$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$31.04$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17$15.17061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520ElderberryCt: 150-1691-0178SNOWBERRYCT150-1694-7918MEADOWRUECT150-1694-7911HICKORYLNN150-1694-689475THAVEN150-1694-689374THAVEN150-1694-6892JACKPINELNN150-1694-689174TH PL & MAPLE150-1694-6889WILDFLOWERTRL150-1694-4506WILDFLOWERTRL150-1694-4505SUNFLOWERCOURT150-1694-4503PRIMROSECOURT150-1694-4502ANNABELLELOT5150-1694-0821FIRLNN/LOT #5: 150-1694-008272NDAVE N: 150-1694-0081FIRLN N: 150-1694-0078FIRLNN/CR10: 150-1694-007674THAVEN: 150-1693-7077FIRLNN/CR10: 150-1693-7076FIRLN/74THAVE: 150-1693-7075FIRLNN: 150-1693-7074Wildflo/Gleason: 150-1693-5734Primrose/Wildfl: 150-1693-573319399Primrose: 150-1693-573219315Primrose: 150-1693-573119343Annabelle: 150-1693-572619345GoldenTR: 150-1693-020019389LupineLN: 150-1693-019919437LupineLN: 150-1693-0197Bridle/66thAve: 150-1692-837466TH/CEDAR:150-1692-83736398Larkspur: 150-1692-09086485Larkspur: 150-1692-090719065Galloway: 150-1691-808219130Galloway: 150-1691-80806657Bridle: 150-1691-80796681Bridle: 150-1691-80666675Carriage: 150-1691-806406/18/205:06PMCITYOF CORCORAN Page 7 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check UnpaidUnpaid G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-43100-381Street/SignalLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsE100-42100-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-43100-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-41941-380Utility & ServicesGENERAL)E100-45200-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-45200-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsE100-45200-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-41941-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E602-49450-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E602-49450-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-43100-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E601-49400-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-41941-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-41941-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-42100-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-42100-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-45200-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)G500-20390 Ravinia Street LightsG 500-20390 Ravinia Street LightsG 500-20390 Ravinia Street LightsTotal WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECT Total ZEPSALES & SERVICETotal XCEL ENERGYXCEL ENERGYZEP SALES & SERVICE$515.60$165.84$513.48$181.88$425.84$242.16$176.96$15.17$61.82$67.29$10.1710.88$21.70$21.70$18.76$21.70$10.17$18.65$18.78$69.43$67.80$29.88$18.65$29.28$18.40$17.90$54.96$15.17$15.17$15.17$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.0006152090052467179005242443900524244390052381979005233260687213819061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520061520MEADOWRUECT150-1694-7919SUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSTREETLIGHTINGCR19/CR30STREETLIGHTING9525CAINROAD6629 CTY101: 150-1691-80629100CtyRd19: 150-1688-84638200CtyRd116: 150-1684-203375thAve/Hwy116:120-1246-79008200CtyRd116: 120-1246-7800Co Rd10 & 50: 120-1246-7700WILDFLOWER: 150-1694-47748200CR116/SIGN: 150-1693-6612BrocktonLn: 150-1689-68719525 CainRd: 150-1689-52308200Cty Rd116: 120-1255-6300SchoolProperty: 120-1247-9600CIVILDEFENSE: 120-1246-8000Ballpark: 120-1246-7200CTYRD10/116000-0100-146963RDAVEN150-1694-9987LARKSPURLN/63RD150-1694-9986STEEPLECHASELN150-1694-792006/18/205:06 PM CITYOFCORCORAN2,120.57$1,348.86$309.45 10100 Farmers State Bank$728, 194.07 Page 8 Check Detail Register© June 2020 FundSummary10100 FarmersStateBank100GENERALFUND602SEWER601WATER500ESCROWHOLDINGFUND427GLEASON/66THPARKWAYEXTENSION425PULTEENCORE/BELLWETHER PROJEC205DWIFORFEITUREFUND101LONG-TERMPLANNINGFUND$501,255.48$78,441.64$51,196.68$87,832.95$3,374.00$5,074.18$200.56$818.5806/18/20 5:06 PMCITYOFCORCORAN 728,194.07 Page 9 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check AmtInvoiceComment CityofCorcoran ConsultantSummary 6/25/2020 NameInvoice DateAmount Due Carson, Clelland & Schreder Landform06/10/20 21,362.39 Metro West Inspection Rolf Erickson Enterprises Wenck Associates06/15/20 100,824.22 Total$ 122,186.61 H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\Council Claims\\2020ClaimsWorkbook.xls 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: T.J. Hofer through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: June 18, 2020 for the June 25, 2020 City Council Meeting RE: Spanier Conditional Use Permit and Variance for the Property located at 10580 Cain Road (PID 02-119-23-23-0004) (city file no. 20-019) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:August 21, 2020 1.Application Request The applicant has requested approval of a conditional use permit to allow a 2,801-sq. ft. detached accessory building (2,193-sq. ft. existing building with a 608-sq. ft. addition) building with 16.4-ft. high sidewalls where 10 ft. sidewalls are allowed. A variance is required along with the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the building was constructed only 14.9 ft. from the property line, where a 20-ft. setback is required. The building was not in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance when it was constructed and therefore is not a legal, non- conforming structure and requires an after-the-fact variance. This project was reviewed and approved in 2015 and was never built. The approvals expired after one year on November 23, 2016. The applicant is now ready to move forward with the project and is requesting approval again with no changes. 2.Planning Commission Review On June 4, 2020 the application was heard at a duly called Public Hearing before the Planning Commission. There were no public comments and the Planning Commission did not have significant discussion about the application. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the CUP and the Variance. 3.Context Zoning and Land Use The property is in the Rural Residential (RR) District and is guided Rural/Ag Residential on the Future Land Use Map. The eastern half of the property is located within the Shoreland Overlay District. The property is located outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Agenda Item: 7c. Spanier CUP and Variance (20-019) 2 June 25, 2020 Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties are also zoned Rural Residential and guided Rural/Ag Residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site The Natural Resource Communities Quality Ranking map identifies medium quality wetlands and a potential natural resource corridor on the eastern half of the parcel. The proposed location of the accessory building is on the western half of the parcel and no impact is proposed. 4. Analysis of Request Variance The applicant is requesting an after-the-fact variance for the existing structure, which was not built in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance standards at the time of construction. The building does not comply with current side yard setback requirements of 20 ft. in Section 1070.040 of the Zoning Ordinance describes the variance process and standards. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all of the following criteria have been met: 1. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. In 1992, the applicant hired a contractor to construct a new accessory building. The plans that were approved in 1992 conformed with the Residential District setback requirement of 20 ft. from the side lot line; however, the accessory structure was not built as shown on the building plans and building permit application. There is nothing in the City records to indicate that either the City or the homeowner were aware of the error at the time of construction. The south corner of the accessory structure (closest to Cain Road) meets the required setback of 20 ft., but the northeast corner of the building does not and is located 14.9 ft. from the side lot line. In order to correct the problem, the owner would be required to move the northeast corner of the building 5.1 ft. to the south, away from the northern property line. 2. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The applicant’s contractor submitted a building permit and plans that were consistent with the setbacks in place at the time of construction. In 1992, the City did not require surveys with building permit applications. The landowner has indicated that he was unaware that the building is non-conforming until the survey was completed this year for the building addition. The City may find that the conditions are unique to this property because the City and landowner had no reason to believe that the structure was not built according to plan. Spanier CUP and Variance (20-019) 3 June 25, 2020 3. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The design and size of the building is comparable to a number of the accessory buildings in the area. According to aerial maps, the applicant has provided some trees to screen the structure from the adjacent property to the north. Staff finds there are no adverse impacts to surrounding property owners and the accessory building is not out of character with the surrounding properties and structures. The building has existed at this reduced setback for more than 20 years and City staff has no record of complaint in the files. 4. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The RR District is intended to provide large lots for single-family homes and hobby farms. The existing structure was constructed to provide indoor storage rather than outdoor storage. Staff finds the accessory structure to be in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and the standards for the RR District other than the setback. The front of the building does comply with the side yard setback requirement, which decreases the impact of the reduced setback on the rear of the building. 5. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Rural/Ag Residential area is intended to remain rural and will continue to be defined by natural areas, such as wetlands and floodplains, and areas that are utilized for planted fields, pasture land, hobby farms, and large residential lots. The accessory structure in this case was placed too close to the lot line, but is otherwise consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. The design and size of the building is comparable to a number of the accessory buildings in the area and staff believes there are no adverse impacts to the surrounding property owners. The Hennepin County aerial map shows that the applicant has provided some landscaping to screen the structure from the adjacent property to the north and has proposed the addition of black spruce trees on the south to minimize the impact. The City Council may find it necessary for additional landscaping or the construction of a fence to further screen the structure and mitigate the encroachment on the northeast portion of the accessory structure. The Council should provide the applicant with specific standards for the amount and location of additional landscaping to mitigate the impact of the variance. Conditional Use Permit The applicant is proposing an accessory building addition with 16.4-ft. sidewalls where 10-ft. sidewalls are allowed. Section 1030.020, Subd. 5(D) of the Zoning Ordinance allows the landowner to request a CUP to exceed this height limitation if the following conditions are met: Spanier CUP and Variance (20-019) 4 June 25, 2020 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. Accessory buildings like this are a permitted use, but the conditional use permit is required to address the increased sidewall height of the proposed building addition. The proposed sidewall height is 16.4 ft., and the permitted sidewall height for an accessory building in the front yard is 10 ft. in the RR District. The applicant has indicated that a larger sidewall is needed to accommodate a 14 ft. door to allow storage of his fifth wheel camper. The applicant intends to mitigate the increased height by planting mature Black Hills Spruce in front of the building to help screen the building. A plan was submitted that shows five Black Hills Spruce, five Clump Birch, and 9 Red Twig Dogwood. The five Spruce were planted and now stand approximately 12-ft. tall. All setback requirements have been met on the addition, which is planned on the front of the existing building. The building addition is 20 ft. from the north property line and 173.7 ft. from Cain Road right-of-way. The proposed building addition is located more than 100 ft. from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL). There is no wetland impact proposed. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands and any recorded easements. A certificate of survey has been provided with necessary information dated August 4, 2015. 3. Applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance. Staff has reviewed the application for compliance with the general conditional use permit standards in Section 1070.020 and found that those conditions have been met. Staff finds that the proposed CUP meets the applicable standards. The proposed addition’s footprint is 608 sq. ft., after the addition the total size of the accessory building footprint will be 2,801 sq. ft., where 3,375 sq. ft. is allowed. The color and material of the proposed building addition is compatible with the surrounding properties. The accessory building will comply with all other standards of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. The applicant is requesting approval to allow the building addition to be finished with metal siding and roofing. The applicant provided a color sample of the beige pro-rib steel panel that will be finished with galvanized coating. Section 1060.050 allows accessory buildings with metal siding and roof if these conditions are met: Spanier CUP and Variance (20-019) 5 June 25, 2020 a. The building meets the standards adopted by the Minnesota State Building Code. b. Metal siding and roofing is treated with a factory applied color coating system against any fading or degradation. The proposed metal siding and roofing material is treated with a galvanized coating and the proposed products meet MN State Building Code standards. Staff recommends approval to allow the metal building materials. 5. The proposed building will be compatible with surrounding land uses. The property is located in the rural portion of the city and several of the surrounding accessory structures are constructed with metal siding. The applicant has indicated that the building is for the storage of his fifth wheel motor home and additional landscaping will be provided to screen the building from Cain Road. The proposed building is compatible with the existing accessory building and the surrounding land uses. 5. Conclusions Staff has reviewed the plans with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Zoning Plan and Zoning Ordinance and finds that the standards for a CUP to exceed the sidewall height and standards to allow metal siding and roofing have been met. Any outstanding issues that must be addressed have been included as conditions in the attached draft resolutions. This is the same as the request approved in 2015. The City Council must first determine if the variance standards have been met. If the Council finds that the variance standards have been met, they may approve the CUP. If the City Council finds that the variance standards have not been met, they should deny the request. The CUP would then be denied based on the finding that it is not in compliance with City requirements. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2020-45 approving the after-the-fact variance and conditional use permit for an addition onto the existing accessory building as recommended by the Planning Commission. Attachments 1. Resolution 2020-45 approving Conditional Use Permit and Variance 2. Site Location Map 3. Engineer’s memo dated May 22, 2020 4. Applicant’s Narrative dated September 30, 2015 5. Applicant’s Description dated May 27, 2018 6. Site plan received May 4, 2020 7. Site Photos received February 16, 2018 8. Landscaping Sketch Plan dated November 11, 2015 City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-45 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVAL OF AN AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE FOR THE EXISTING ACCESSORY BUILDING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ACCESSORY BUILDING ADDITION (PID 02-119-23-23-0004) (CITY FILE NO. 20-019) WHEREAS, Thomas Spanier is requesting approval of an after-the-fact variance for an existing accessory building and a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of an accessory building addition on property legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, JUDY ANNS COUNTRY ACRES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the variance and conditional use permit at a duly called public meeting and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a variance and conditional use permit approval, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. Approval is granted to allow for the construction of a building addition as shown on application and plans received by the City on April 28, 2020 except as amended by this resolution. 2. An after-the-fact variance to allow for a 14.9-foot side yard setback where 20 feet is required, is approved subject to the following findings: a. There are practical difficulties for the applicant in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant intended to comply with City standards to meet the setback requirements according to building plans and City records. There is nothing to indicate that either the City or the applicant were aware of the error at the time of construction. The building has been constructed for more than 20 years and no records of complaint are on file with the City. It is not practical for the applicant to move the accessory structure 5.1 feet to the south and meeting the standard would not enhance the appearance of the building and would not enhance the health safety and welfare of the general public. b. The conditions upon which the variance request is based are unique to this parcel due to the error during construction. The City and the landowner had no reason to believe that the structure was not built according to plans. c. The accessory building will not alter the essential character of the locality. The existing accessory building is consistent with other uses in the area. d. The accessory building is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance and the standards for the RR District other than the reduced setback. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-45 Page 2 of 3 e. The accessory structure was constructed too close to the lot line, but is otherwise consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance is consistent with the rural nature of the zoning district. 3. A conditional use permit is approved to allow for an accessory building addition with 16 - foot 4-inch sidewall height where 10 feet is allowed, subject to the following findings: a. The proposed addition complies with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The project provides a unified look with the neighboring buildings. b. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community. The increased sidewall height will allow for storage of the applicant’s fifth wheel motor home and provide a unified look that is consistent with the RR District. c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The increased sidewall height is less than the principal structure and similar in nature to other accessory buildings on neighboring properties. Landscape screening will be provided to reduce the impact of the increase side wall height. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. The increased height will have no adverse impact on surrounding development or improvement of surrounding properties. e. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. The increased sidewall height of the building addition will have no impact on public facilities and services. f. The conditional use conforms to the applicable regulations of the Rural Residential District. g. The conditional use and site conforms to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and finds that the building addition conforms to other standards specified in the Zoning Code. 4. A certificate of compliance to allow metal roof and siding on this accessory building addition is also approved as part of the CUP. 5. A building permit is required prior to beginning construction. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/landowner must record the approving resolution at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 7. Prior to release of any remaining escrow, the landscaping as shown on the landscape plan received November 17, 2015 shall be installed. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-45 Page 3 of 3 8. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use and the required improvements. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25rd day of June 2020. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/ Administrative Services Coordinator Technical Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - ENGINEER’S MEMO To: Kendra Lindahl, AICP, City Planner From: Kent Torve, P.E., City Engineer Date: May 22, 2020 Subject: Spanier 1. General The City’s position is consistent with previous review that the proposed building extension is significantly away from wetlands and therefore no wetland delineation is needed for the project. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7d. Council Meeting: June 25th, 2020 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Tobacco License Approvals Action Required: Approval Summary: The City licenses establishments annually for the sale of tobacco. For license approval, applicants must submit the required application materials and insurance documentation. for license renewal. Financial/Budget: License fees are estimated annually and are a budgeted revenue source . Council Action: Approve Resolution 2020-46 Resolution Approving Beer and Liquor Licenses in the City of Corcoran, Minnesota. Attachments: 1. To be Provided Separately - Resolution 2020-46 Resolution Approving Beer and Liquor Licenses in the City of Corcoran, Minnesota City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING TOBACCO LICENSES IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran that the following Tobacco Licenses are granted a conditional license effective July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021, to the following establishments and licensees as the appropriate application, insurance documents, and payment have been provided. ESTABLISHMENT LICENSEE LICENSES Corcoran Crossroads Market Place Harikrishna LLC Tobacco Mama G’s Mama G’s Operations LLC Tobacco The Original Tom Thumb HJRAE, LLC Tobacco VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Anderson, Tom Anderson, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of June 2020. ___________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Engineer’s Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - To: Brad Martens, City Administrator From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Date: June 17, 2020 Subject: Pay Request #1 – CSAH 101 & Stieg Road Turn Lane Improvements Council Action Requested •Approve Pay Request #1 to New Look Contracting in the amount of $290,655.12 Project Summary •Contract Amount - $343,535.00 •Change Orders to Date - $0 •Projected Total - $343,535.00 Financing Financing is provided by developer through an escrow. Project Update This amount brings the total approved to date to 87% of the total project value before withholding the 5% retainage amount of $10,567.52. The requested amount is related to mobilization, erosion control, removals and turn lane construction, and restoration. Next Steps Remaining work includes monitoring seed growth and completing punch list items. Agenda Item 7e. Engineer’s Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - To: Brad Martens, City Administrator From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Date: June 17, 2020 Subject: Pay Request #4 – Stieg Road Realignment Council Action Requested •Approve Pay Request #4 to C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. in the amount of $194,162.68. Project Summary •Original Contract Amount - $919,210.80 •Change Orders to Date - $16,234.55 •Revised Contract Amount - $935,445.35 •Projected Total - $974,419.00 Financing Financing is provided by developers through an escrow. Project Update This amount brings the total approved to date to 100% of the total project value before withholding the 5% retainage amount of $48,720.95 The requested amount is related to trail construction, wear course paving, striping, installation of signs, and restoration Changes in quantities were generally a result of road subgrade requiring an additional foot of select granular and additional Class V aggregate for the trail construction. Next Steps C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. completed construction on the Steig Road Improvements. Remaining work includes monitoring seed growth and verify completion of punch list items. Agenda Item 7f. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: June 17, 2020 for the June 25, 2020 City Council Meeting RE: Preliminary Plat for Kariniemi Addition (PID 33-119-23-22-0004 and 33-119-23-21- 0001) (city file no 20-016) 120-Day Review Deadline: September 10, 2020 1.Application Request Nate Kariniemi has submitted a request for a Preliminary Plat to create four lots from two existing lots. The proposal is to replat the parcel at 6780 Rolling Hills Road and 6855 Willow Drive. 2.Planning Commission The Planning Commission reviewed the Preliminary Plat at their regularly scheduled meeting on June 4, 2020. There were five residents who spoke at the public hearing for the application. Concerns were expressed about the access, stormwater drainage, septic fields and density of the homes. The Commissioners discussed the proposed plan and had questions related to drainage, the development right transfers and overall number of conditions. After discussion, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat with no revisions to staff’s recommendation. 3. Context Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. Zoning and Land Use The subject property is guided Rural / Ag Residential in the 2040 Future Land Use Plan and zoned Rural Residential. The properties to the south, west, east and north are guided Rural / Ag Residential and zoned Rural Residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site There are various medium quality wetlands shown in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A wetland Agenda Item: 8a. Kariniemi Addition (20-016) 2 June 25, 2020 Delineation has been approved by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission for Lots 1, 2 and 3. Background On October 24, 2019, the City Council approved a final plat for Rolling Hills Acres, which subdivided the existing 40.8-acre parcel into 4 single family lots. Lot 3, Block 1 (6780 Rolling Hills Road) was purchased by the applicant is and now proposed to be combined with the property to the east and replatted. 4. Analysis of Request Preliminary Plat The applicant is proposing a preliminary plat that will combine the 12.8-acre Lot 3, Block 1, Rolling Hills Acres and the 40-acre parcel to the east to create four parcels. Lot 3, Block 1, Rolling Hills acres has one development right for construction of a single home on the property. The property to the east has four development rights (one for the existing home and three remaining). The applicant is proposing to create four lots and assign one development right each to the proposed Lots 1-3 and assign two to Lot 4 (one for the existing home and one for possible use in a future subdivision). Access/Streets The existing home at 6855 Willow Drive has an existing driveway out to Willow Drive. It is staff’s understanding that there is an existing private driveway easement, but we have included a condition requiring a copy of this easement to the City to ensure access will remain for the existing home. Because this is an existing condition and the boundaries of Lot 4 are not changing, staff does not believe a variance is required. However, if Lot 4 is subdivided in the future to use the remaining development right, both of the lots will need to show compliance with the frontage requirements in the City or request a variance. The three western lots are proposed to have access off a private drive that connects to Rolling Hills Road. A private drive is allowed in the Rural Residential District only if the Council finds the following conditions are met: • That a public street connection is not required for the street network. • That the private drive meets the design standards adopted in the Subdivision Ordinance. • That the access for each lot in the subdivision is from the private drive and the private drive is not included in the parcel size calculation. • That an easement and maintenance agreement are established for all private drives. • That an HOA (homeowners association) is established to ensure that the private drive remains “private”. Kariniemi Addition (20-016) 3 June 25, 2020 As part of this application an access easement is being dedicated over the private drive. The city engineer has reviewed the private drive for compliance with the design standards and the memo has been included as a condition of approval. As part of the final plat a recordable easement document, maintenance agreement and HOA document must be submitted to ensure the private drive is properly maintained in perpetuity. The private drive agreements must include plans for snow storage to ensure it does not impact adjacent properties. All four of the proposed lots must be party to the private drive easement, maintenance agreement and HOA. If all of the conditions in the draft resolution are met, the Code requirements will be met for a private drive. The private drive is shown extending to Lot 4 to provide future access to the lot. Lot 4 has one development right remaining. Although subdivision of Lot 4 is not proposed at this time, the applicant must provide enough information to show how access could be provided. There are several items that will need to be addressed to allow for the development right to be utilized. The private drive crosses wetland, floodplain and a trail easement. Extension of the private drive in the future will require approval from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the floodplain fill and approval from the City as the LGU for the Wetland Conservation Act for the wetland fill prior to any development approval for subdivision of Lot 4. There is no guarantee that these approvals will be granted. Any future subdivision of Lot 4 will require the developer to show that access to each of the new lots can be provided in compliance with ordinance requirements. Lot Standards The applicant is proposing to create four lots. The proposed lots on the preliminary plat exceed the minimum lot size and depth standards in the zoning ordinance for the RR district. For purpose of complying with the minimum lot width requirements, the front of the lot shall be the lot line adjacent to the private drive. The proposed lots meet the lot width requirement at the private drive. Lot 4 will continue to use the existing private driveway, but it should be noted that future subdivision will require 200 feet of lot frontage along the private drive, public street or a variance from these standards. A ghost plat must be provided which shows how the private drive could provide access to Lot 4. Wetlands A wetland delineation report was submitted for proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3 that was approved by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. Prior to submittal of a final plat application, the applicant must obtain approval of a wetland delineation for Lot 4. Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance provides standards for wetlands. The wetland on-site is defined as a medium quality wetland on site, which requires a 25-foot average wetland buffer and a 15-foot buffer setback. The Rolling Hills Acres plat met these requirements but this plat must show these buffers, setbacks and signs for all four lots. Kariniemi Addition (20-016) 4 June 25, 2020 Wetland buffer monuments must be installed for all four lots prior to issuance of a building permit. Where the City and ECWMC differ in standards, the applicant shall comply with the more restrictive standard. Landscaping Each single-family residential lot is required to have one tree. A landscaping plan has been provided showing the required trees which will be installed at construction. Utilities This site is located outside of the MUSA boundary and will be served by individual water wells and septic sites. The proposed septic locations comply with the city wetland setback standards. Septic locations need to be approved by the Hennepin County Public Health Department prior to submittal of the final plat application. Parks and Trails There is an existing trail easement on the east property line of the proposed Lot 3, which must be maintained as part of this plat and recorded in the HOA documents. Park Dedication Requirements Under the current ordinance, park dedication is only taken for newly created lots. The existing Lot 3, Block 1 of the Rolling Hills Acres final plat previously paid park dedication and Lot 4 of the Kariniemi Addition is an existing developed lot and is exempt from park dedication. Therefore, park dedication is due for the two newly created lots with this plat. There is no park land planned on this site, therefore, staff recommends cash-in-lieu of land for this site. For residential developments, the cash in lieu of land fee has been calculated based on the per capita share of park system costs at $3,970 per single family unit (2 x $3,970 = $7,940). Park dedication is due prior to release of the final plat for recording. The fee will be based on the fee schedule in place when the final plat is submitted. Conclusion Staff has reviewed the plan for consistency with the applicable standards in the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. 5. Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2020-47 approving the preliminary plat, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Kariniemi Addition (20-016) 5 June 25, 2020 Attachments a. Resolution 2020-47 approving the preliminary plat b. Location Map c. Engineer’s Memo dated May 27, 2020 d. Public Safety memo dated May 7, 2020 e. Letter from Andrew and Lisa Wyffels dated May 18, 2020 f. Preliminary Plat dated April 21, 2020 g. Engineering Plans dated April 21, 2020 City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-47 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR KARINIEMI ADDITION FOR NATE KARINIEMI ON THE 52.8-ACRE SITE AT 6780 ROLLING HILLS ROAD AND 6855 WILLOW DRIVE (PID 33- 119-23-22-0004 AND 33-119-23-21-0001) (CITY FILE 20-016) WHEREAS, Nate Kariniemi (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a preliminary plat to create 2 lots from an existing 12.8-acre parcel and plat an existing 40-acre parcel legally described as: Parcel 1: Lot 3, Block 1, ROLLING HILLS ACRES, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. Parcel 2: The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to allow the creation of four lots, in accordance with the application materials and plans received by the City on April 28, 2020 and revisions received May 11, 2020, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated May 28, 2020. 3. A wetland delineation for Lot 4 must be submitted to the LGU and approved prior to submittal of a final plat application. 4. Septic locations must be approved by the Hennepin County Public Health Department prior to submittal of a final plat application. 5. The applicant must comply with all wetland buffer requirements for all four lots: a. Plans must be revised to show the required wetland buffer, wetland buffer setback and wetland buffer signs for Lot 4 after approval of the wetland delineation. b. A Wetland buffer planting plan and maintenance plan must be submitted for review and approval. The HOA shall be responsible for maintenance of the wetland buffers in accordance with these plans. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-47 Page 2 of 3 c. Wetland buffer monuments shall be installed on all four lots prior to issuance of building permit. d. The developer must install the wetland buffer plantings prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for any of the lots. 6. Drainage and utility easements must be provided over all wetlands, wetland buffers and ponds. 7. The existing trail easement on east property line of proposed Lot 3 must be maintained as part of the plat. 8. Lot 4 has one existing home and one development right remaining. Lots 1-3 have no development rights remaining. 9. The applicant must provide a ghost plat showing how Lot 4 could be subdivided. 10. The ghost plat must show how access could be provided to the new lot either over the private drive extension (with 200 feet of frontage) or an alternative route. 11. The applicant must provide a copy of the existing driveway easement for the proposed Lot 4 12. The developer is required to create a Homeowners Association (HOA) for maintenance of the private drive. The applicant shall provide copies of the final HOA documents/covenants for City review as part of the final plat application. a. The HOA documents shall ensure that the private drive remain “private” in perpetuity b. The HOA documents shall require mandatory participation of all homeowners that have access via the private drive and shall include the requirement for creation of a fund to address maintenance, drainage and snow removal on the private drive. c. HOA shall be responsible for the wetland buffer maintenance. d. The existing trail easement shall be included and recorded in the HOA documents. 13. The applicant shall provide a recordable access easement for the private drive as part of the final plat. 14. The applicant shall apply for an easement vacation for Rolling Hill Acres Lot 3 with the final plat application. 15. The applicant shall provide a maintenance agreement for the private drive as part of the final plat application, subject to the review of the City Attorney. 16. Park dedication shall be cash in lieu of land in accordance with the park dedication policy in place when the final plat is released for recording. a. Park dedication is due for the two new lots. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-47 Page 3 of 3 17. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of June 2020. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Henn e p in Co u nty Prop erty Map Da te : 5/2 8/2020 Com ments: 1 inc h = 8 00 feet Divisio n in Proces s The d isp layed p arc e l b oun da ry may n ot be the actual boundarybecause th is pr op er ty is in the p roc ess of being dividedor r epla tt ed. PID : 3 311 923220004ADDRESS: 6 78 0 R ollin g H ills Rd, Corcoran MN 00000 This dat a (i) is fur nished 'AS IS' wit h no represent at ion as t o com plet enes s or acc ura cy ; (ii) is furnis hed with no war rant y of an y k ind; an d (i ii) is not s uit able for lega l, engi neering or s urv ey ing purpos es . Hen nepin C ounty s hall not be liable f or any damage, in jury o r los s r esu lt ing f rom t his data. CO PYRIG HT © HENNEPIN CO UN TY 20 20 Technical Memo Wenck | Colorado | Georgia | Minnesota | North Dakota | Wyoming Toll Free 800-472-2232 Web wenck.com ENGINEER’S MEMO To: Kendra Lindahl, AICP, City Planner From: Kent Torve, P.E., City Engineer Date: May 28, 2020 Subject: Kariniemi Addition Plans dated 4-21-2020 show Nate Kariniemi is proposing to create 4 rural residential lots on Rolling Hills Road. Lots 1, 2 and 3 were previously platted as Lot 3 of Rolling Hills Acres and Lot 4 has an existing home. 1. General Provide documentation from Elm Creek WMO that permit was received and comments addressed. Individual lot grading plans showing building constraints are required prior to final plat. This will simplify the building permit process for the future owner. Septic is approved by Hennepin County. Individual lot grading plans will be provided prior to final plat approval. These will be consistent with overall plans but provide document to be followed for the building permit process. Watershed permit required. Road will be required to pass a roll test as observed by City Engineer 2. Private Street ROW and Entrance 60-foot ROW is required Pave first 75 feet of access from Rolling Hills ROW per City requirement. 3. Drainage Offsite drainage areas and calculations are required. Design appears to allow flow over private road from the north. Entrance culvert calculations required. All drainage swales require profiles on plans for additional review. North side or private road requires a swale to manage drainage. Drainage to east down steep slope requires erosion prevention. Kendra Lindahl City Planner 2 \\MSPFSV02\DesignDepot\Workshop\City of Corcoran\COR20016 - Karineimi Addition\Kariniemi_2020 May.docx Dry pond may need to be modified to filtration basin with forebay for WMO water quality requirements. OCS may be required and EOF shall be 1 foot above HWL. Basin discharge shall to be directly east on Lot 3 (prohibited from discharging across property line to south). Additional pipe may be necessary. 4. Lot 4 Access to Lot 4 does not appear feasible from the private road due to floodplain and wetlands. Trail crossing required to be addressed also. Lot 4 requires a wetland delineation and easements over wetlands and floodplain. Driveway spot elevation shows 998, should be corrected. Future Subdivision of Lot 4 The following comments were identified by staff if Lot 4 will be further subdivided in The future. o Extend the private drive 200 feet into future lot with turnaround o Complete hydrologic modeling to determine actual floodplain elevation o Mitigate any floodplain or wetland impacts o Add additional stormwater treatment consistent with current ECWMC permit requirements o Implement a future trail crossing as approved by City 5. Grading Offsite grading is shown, provide easement from adjacent landowner. North edge of Lot 4 may need erosion stabilization for steep slope. CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us Memo To: Planning (Planner Lindahl) From: Director Gottschalk Date: May 7, 2020 Re: Kariniemi Plan Review A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on 05/06/2020. In attendance were: Director of Public Safety Gottschalk, Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Fire Chief Feist, Fire Chief Dave Malewicki, Fire Chief Leuer, Building Inspector Todd Geske, and Code Compliance Official Pritchard. The following are comments from the meeting: 1. The private driveway, since it is serving three properties, will need to meet fire apparatus road specifications and be subject to the associated maintenance and parking restrictions. This memo serves as a preliminary review and assumes that all specifications not articulated in the concept meet City standards. Additional fire and building codes will apply. 18th May 2020 City of Corcoran 8200 County Rd 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 To whom it may concern, It has recently come to the attention of my wife and I that the owners of Lot 3, Block 1, Rolling Hills Acres are inquiring about splitting the parcel from a single lot into three individual lots. My wife and I own Lot 2, Block 1, Rolling HIlls Acres and are writing the city this letter to express our concerns about a subdivision being put in next to our lot. The original parcel was split into two 10 acre lots (lots 1 and 2), a 6.8 acre lot with existing homestead (lot 4), and an additional 12.8 acres (lot 3). At the time of this split, each lot was given a single building entitlement. One of the main reasons my wife and I purchased our lot in November of 2019 was with the belief that all four lots would remain intact and only retain the rights for one building entitlement per lot. By splitting lot 3 we would no longer have the type of property we purchased. Aside from the aesthetic impact to our land, we also have concerns about the impact this would have on water drainage. First, both lot 1 and 2 depend on the drain tile that runs under lot 3 for proper drainage. If this is disrupted it could lead to additional standing water on lots 1 and 2. It was originally not an issue as the potential for impact was minimal and addressed in the original split. But if there were three houses in that area, there is a higher potential for disruption. Secondly, the plat design has a shared driveway as tight as possible to the northern property line of lot 3. While it looks like the driveway is within the easement requirements, the plat is not addressing some critical items. With the edge of the private driveway being only 15 feet from our property line, it is not showing any ditching. I would expect some sort of ditch to address runoff and drainage from the private drive and I would expect the edge of the ditch to not enter the 15 foot restriction. Additionally, the design does not show that the owners are ensuring that snow drift and snow removal is not intruding onto lot 2. If snow removal pushes or blows the snow to the north, this will cause additional snow drifting onto lot 2. Not only could this cause complications in the winter and additional kill-off of crops in lot 2 in the spring, but now there will be additional water run off in the spring. This could easily lead to flooding on our property. Third, at the middle point of lots 2 and 3, there is significant water drainage. Before, this was not an issue, as the expectation was that the driveway for lot 3 would be towards the middle of the property, or the single building entitlement to be built at the front of the property. With the proposal of a shared driveway running to the extreme north of lot 3, this could likely create a water dam causing water to back up on our property. It is obvious to see how the water flows when standing at the property looking east. (See image at the end of the letter.) If a raised drive is put 15 feet from my property line, it is very likely that it will act as a dam pushing flowing water back onto our property. Even with proper culverts it could still create temporary water restrictions saturating the ground on lot 2. With the soil in this area consisting of heavy clay, proper water drainage is a must to avoid standing water. We plan to plant various crops, fruits, and vegetables near the south line of lot 2 and do not want drainage problems created by the driveway that will compromise those. My wife and I have been living in Corcoran for the past 8 years and plan to continue to live here for many more years to come. Being part of the community and having the quality of life we set out to obtain when purchasing this land are important to us. Most new lots along Rolling Hills Road are 7+ acres with single homesteads. Splitting up a 12.8 acre lot into three parts with a shared driveway to make a subdivision just does not fit with the look and feel of the Rolling Hills community. We would like the city to consider the local landscape and whether this makes sense for the local community to split the land in this way. We hope you will take all of this into consideration when reviewing this land use application. Thank you, Andrew & Lisa Wyffels From:Patrick Kelley To:Brad Martens Subject:FW: Rolling Hills Rd. Lot 3, Block 1 Zoning June 4, 2020 PlanningCommision Date:Wednesday, June 3, 2020 8:59:24 AM bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us From: Patrick Kelley Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 8:35 AM To: bmartyens@ci.corcoran.mn.us Cc: Jill Baker; Donavon DesMarais Subject: Rolling Hills Rd. Lot 3, Block 1 Zoning June 4, 2020 PlanningCommision June 3, 2020 City of Corcoran 8200 County Rd. 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 To whom it may concern, I am writing on behalf of myself Patrick Kelley and the co-owner Jill Baker of property located at 6760 Rolling Hills Rd. Corcoran, MN Lot 4 Block 1. Late last year we purchased the homestead of the original 40 acre farm with an existing home on the property. Our plans are to bring life back to this home and property. Our property receives most of the drainage from the entire 40 acres as is and was originally all field. This being said when we purchased this property we were under the assumption there would be 3 homes built on the remaining three lots broken out of the 40acres. The main wetland designated during the rezoning and approved is staked out and mostly is located on our property, This being said we have a small area aside the markers to access the dry back portion of our land. It has come to our attention there are plans to put 3 homes not the original 1 as we understood on lot 3 Block 1 directly connected to our land. In the past crops have consumed moisture on the land and the thought of having homes with yards are very concerning for the effect on our wetland area, recently wild grasses have been planted in the field as part of the original parcels being split for land erosion and before this I had noticed a crevasse being created by water through lots 2 and 3 coming to our land like a river. This has come as a major concern to myself, I have been in the construction industry for 35 years and have seen results from land development and home building. My concerns are as follows: 1.First and most important is our new septic and drain field located on the front corner of our property adjoining Lot 3, The soil here is clay and holds top soil water for quite a long period of time. The concern is contamination if the forward wetland grows out of its boundaries and floats our drain field/septic area. 2. Second I understand there is drain field from the fields coming to our land and worry this is disturbed or overwhelmed by the proposed three home sites. 3. Each homesite will disturb the dispersment of water from being allowed to naturally absorb into the ground as buildings will create mass amount of concentrated water to the top soil which cannot be absorbed fast enough creating major flooding to the wetlands. 4. Irrigation. The potential of 3 homes or even one having irrigation in the future also presents concerns for the preservation of the containment of the area of the wetlands. As I stated I have been in construction my entire career and I must say in purchasing this property had minor concerns for disruption of the land we own as I assumed in order to put homes where there was only field the building and development process would safeguard and protect our wetlands from contamination and excess Drainage to preserve the areas. I have complete faith in the municipality to regulate the development of these properties as homes are built up the hill from our property which is on the lowest land already I was assuming the water management would improve as these lots are developed and we would have a beautiful controlled wetland in the future. We ask all building sites above us address the shed of water and assumed all builders would responsibly contain the water on their land as they develop. Respectfully submitted, Patrick Kelley Jill Baker 6760 Rolling Hills Rd. Corcoran, MN May I please ask acknowledgment upon the receipt of this letter Thank You In Advance!! Mark and Jamie Radintz I 6890 Rolling Hills Road I Corcoran, MN 55340 I jmradintz@gmail.com June 22, 2020 City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to express our disappointment in the possibility of a subdivision of Lot 3 of Rolling Hills Acres. When my husband and I initially purchased Lot 1 of Rolling Hills Acres, much of the appeal was knowing the area was not densely populated. Before this property was divided we were aware of the four building rights and moved forward with the expectation that there could potentially be two other homes, in addition to the original farm, on the 40‐acre property. We had no idea there was a possibility of additional building rights being added or transferred. Increasing the number of houses on this amount of acreage makes it feel like more of a neighborhood – which is not what we were looking for when moving to this part of Rolling Hills Road. We hope you strongly consider the impact to the neighboring properties when reviewing this application. Creating two additional lots on this property would change the look and feel of the area. Please don’t hesitate to reach out to either Mark or me with any questions. Sincerely, Jamie Radintz SHEET NO. OF SHEETSREV. NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTIONDESIGNED DRAWNCHECKEDDATE:PROJECT NO:Engineers & Land Surveyors, Inc.SSOCIATES9 West Division StreetBuffalo, MN 55313(763)682-4727Fax: (763)682-3522www.ottoassociates.com4-21-20DETAILSKARINIEMI ADDITIONNATE KARINIEMIHAMEL, MN19-054055I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Paul E. OttoLicense # 40062 Date:BLANKET DETAIL (IN DITCH BOTTOM)8' WIDE WOOD FIBERMN/DOT 3885 CAT. 3EROSION CONTROL BLANKETFLOWSILT FENCE DETAILREDUNDANT SILT FENCE DETAILRIPRAP AT CMP OUTLETS From:Nate To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; mpritchard@ci.corcoran.mn.us; Kevin Shay Subject:Tree map Date:Monday, May 11, 2020 10:31:56 AM Here is a map of all trees on the 40 acre property and there are no trees on the 13 acre. Sent from my iPhone Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: June 18, 2020 for the June 25, 2020 City Council Meeting RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for “Tavera” at the northwest corner of Hackamore Road and County Road 116 (PID 35-119-23-44-0001, 35-119-23-11-0001, 35-119-23-12-0002, 35-119-23-41-0001 and 35-119-23-43-0001) (City File 20-017) REVIEW DEADLINE: August 19, 2020 1. Description of Request The applicant is requesting approval of “Tavera”, a 549-unit residential development at the northwest corner of County Road 116 and Hackamore Road. The project includes a mix of single-family, villa, twinhome and townhome units. The phasing plan shows development in eight phases. *Key plan application materials are attached as part of this packet; however, due to size limitations not every item is included. The complete application is available at city hall. 2.Parks and Trails Commission Review The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed the item on May 21, 2020 and voted 6-0 to recommended approval with the conditions as outlined in the staff report. 3.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item on June 4th. In addition to the applicant, there were three residents to who spoke on this item. In addition, one those speakers also submitted a letter and an email that were provided to the Commissioners (both are attached to this report). There were concerns about the PUD process and how it is different from a variance application, density of the development and the change in character from farm to homes. The Commission has a robust discussion about the project. A number of issues were discussed but tree preservation, landscaping and architecture were significant discussion items. The Commission voted 3-2 (Jacobs and Dickman nay) to recommended approval with three changes to the PUD resolution to: 1.require cul de sac islands 2.require a permanent conservation easement over tree preservation areas 3.expand the areas where additional landscaping is required to include lots 245, 246 and 490- 501. The attached resolution reflects these changes. Agenda Item: 8b. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 2 June 25, 2020 4. Context Zoning and Land Use The properties are guided Low Density Residential and zoned Urban Reserve. The Dempsey property is guided Agricultural Preserve, the designation expired on April 27, 2020 and was reclassified as Low Density Residential because the Comprehensive Plan states “When land is removed from the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve program, the land use will revert to its underlying land use: Rural/Ag Residential outside of the MUSA and Low Density Residential in the MUSA.” All but the Dempsey property are in the 2020-2025 phase of the 2040 Staging Plan. The Dempsey property is in the 2035-2040 phase and a Comprehensive Plan amendment is required to bring it into phase I. Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties are guided Existing Residential and Low Density Residential and zoned Urban Reserve. The property to the south, across Hackamore Road, is located in the City of Medina and developed with single family homes in Foxberry Farms subdivision. Natural Characteristics of the Site There are a number of wetlands on site, including a public waters basin on the south side of the McKown property. The Natural Resource Inventory map identifies a number of natural plant communities scattered throughout the project area. The Ecologically Significant Natural Areas map shows Maple-basswood forest, lowland hardwood forest and oak forest on the site. The Water Resources map shows a creek in the northwest portion of the site and this creek is in the Shoreland Overlay District and a ditch in the eastern portion of the side that is subject to the 16.5-foot buffer requirement. There are three areas of FEMA floodplain in the northern portion of the site. School Districts The Wessel and McKown properties are in the Wayzata School District and the Theis and Dempsey properties are in the Rockford School District. 5. Analysis of Request A. Level of Discretion in Decision Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a comprehensive plan amendment. The comprehensive use plan is the city’s long-range planning tool that indicates what type of development should occur on all land within the City. In other words, it is the City’s plan for how it wants to direct future development and growth. The City Council may guide property as it deems necessary to protect and promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 3 June 25, 2020 The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City must deny the rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving PUDs. A PUD must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community and surrounding area. The City’s discretion in approving a preliminary plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance and the conditions of preliminary plat approval. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. Comprehensive Plan Amendment As part of the application, Lennar is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to amend the Sanitary Sewer Staging plan to bring all of the affected parcels into the initial stage (2020-2025) from the final phase (2035-2040). Staff recommends that the amendment include the addition of this new 4-acre park parcel as the neighborhood park is not shown on the current Parks and Trail Plan map. As noted earlier, the Dempsey property is guided Agricultural Preserve, the designation expired on April 27, 2020 and was reclassified as Low Density Residential because the Comprehensive Plan states “When land is removed from the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve program, the land use will revert to its underlying land use: Rural/Ag Residential outside of the MUSA and Low Density Residential in the MUSA.” No Comprehensive Plan amendment is required, but we will note it in our Metropolitan Council amendment. The Comprehensive Plan is a living document and when the City finds evidence to support a change to the plan, the City Council has the discretion to make a change. The City should consider the following issues when reviewing a comprehensive plan amendment request: • Evidence submitted by the applicant demonstrating the reason(s) that the plan should be changed, including, but not limited to, whether new information has become available since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted that supports re-examination of the plan, or that existing or proposed development offers new opportunities or constraints that were not previously considered by the plan. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 4 June 25, 2020 • Whether or not the change is needed to allow reasonable development of the site. • The relationship of the proposed amendment to the supply and demand for particular land uses within the city and the immediate vicinity of the site. • A demonstration by the applicant that the proposed amendment has merit beyond the interests of the proponent. • The possible impacts of the amendment on all specific elements of the Comprehensive Plan as may be applicable, including, but not limited to: o Transportation o Sanitary sewer, including existing and proposed sanitary sewer flows as compared to the adopted plan; o Housing, including the extent to which the proposal contributes to the City’s adopted housing goals; o Surface water, including compliance with the City’s goals for water quality as well as water quantity management; o Water supply; o Parks and open space; and • Consideration of the impact of the proposed amendment upon current and future special assessments and utility area charges, future property tax assessments or other fiscal impacts upon the City. This is a policy decision for the City Council. The City should evaluate all of these issues when considering the decision. Staff recommends approval of the staging plan change as it will allow the property to be developed as a whole and provide looping of infrastructure with the addition of the Dempsey property to the project. Rezoning The properties in this proposed development are all zoned Urban Reserve (UR), which is a holding zone until development is proposed and municipal sewer and water are available. The applicant is requesting that the properties be rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The rezoning would be consistent with the underlying Low Density Residential land use designation, which requires development at 3-5 units per net acre. The Zoning Ordinance has established a PUD zoning district with the purpose of promoting a creative and efficient use of land by providing design flexibility in the development of residential neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas that would not be possible under a conventional zoning district. In this case, the developer is requesting PUD flexibility primarily for lot size and setbacks and architectural standards. The project is requesting PUD flexibility for: 1. Lot area and lot width reductions for villas, single family homes on 55-foot lots and twinhomes 2. Rear yard setback of 20 feet for decks/patios where 30 feet is required for single family, villas and twinhomes 3. Garage size standards a. Single family homes and villas are proposed at 63% for two-car garages, 75% for 3- car garages and 68% for 4-car garages where 55% is the maximum allowed. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 5 June 25, 2020 b. Twinhomes will comply with the 55% maximum c. A 420 sq. ft. garage where 440 sq. ft. is required for townhome units with basements and 540 sq. ft. for those without basements. d. Townhome garage width of 19 feet where a minimum width of 20 feet is required 4. Townhome architecture – minimum stone/brick requirements. 5. Townhomes setback flexibility a. 15 feet between building where 20 feet is required b. Setback (to curb of private street) 20 feet where 25 feet is required c. Setback to public street 20 feet where 25 feet required In exchange for this flexibility, the applicant will: a. Provide additional landscaping beyond the ordinance requirements a. The plans show 944 trees where 665 are required b. Preserve environmental features a. Preservation of 96% of the wetlands on site b. Preservation of 30 acres of wooded areas c. Provide an opportunity for construction of the planned regional trail a. The off-road trail is planned by both the City and Three Rivers Park District and can be shifted east into this site and constructed by the developer d. Construct at their cost the parking lot in the park e. Provide off-site infrastructure improvement at their cost to benefit this site and surrounding properties. f. Provide an entrance monument to welcome travelers to Corcoran a. No details have been provided for the sign planned at the NW corner of County Road 116 and Hackamore. g. A well designed neighborhood providing new housing options with some improved architecture in compliance with the Comprehensive goals and general architecture standards The PUD flexibility is discussed more detail in the PUD Development Plan section of this report. The City must review this request for compliance with the PUD standards as follows: 1. The planned development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The planned unit development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed pre- development net density is 2.85 units per acre, when the post-development area is calculated we expect it will be within the 3-5 units per acre expected in the Low Density Residential land use classification. The plan incorporates the trail, park and street connections anticipated within the site and preserves significant portions of the existing natural resources on site. 2. The planned development is not in conflict with the intent of the underlying zoning district. The planned development of 549 homes is consistent with the intent of the RSF-3 and RMF-1 districts and the Comprehensive Plan goals to provide a variety of housing options.. The applicant is requesting approval of PUD zoning for design flexibility to allow for modification to the architectural standards, provide a mix of lot sizes and reduced setbacks for this neighborhood at a density consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 6 June 25, 2020 3. The planned development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer will provide both internal infrastructure needed to support their development and off-site street improvements, a new neighborhood park and trunk infrastructure improvements that will serve a larger development area. 4. The planned development or unit thereof is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and/or operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other subsequent unit or phase. The planned development is feasible without dependence upon any other subsequent phase. The project has an 8-year phasing plan and development is contingent upon completion of trunk infrastructure improvements and water service. The initial phase will include the construction of the primary project infrastructure, roadway improvements on County Road 116 at the main entrance and other key public infrastructure improvements. 5. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing public trails consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and a new City park. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve this site at the developer’s expense. 6. The planned development will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. The planned development is a residential neighborhood developed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore, will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. 7. The quality of the building and site design proposed by the PUD plan shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, shall demonstrate higher standards, more efficient and effective uses of streets, utilities and public facilities, it shall maintain and enhance any natural resources within the development, and create a public benefit that is greater than what would be achieved through the strict application of the primary zoning regulations The quality of the site design proposed by the PUD shall enhance the aesthetics of the site, install and provide streets, utilities and public facilities that may not otherwise be installed and create public benefit that is greater than would otherwise be achieved due to the construction and financing of all Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 7 June 25, 2020 related infrastructure improvements. The development will meet the City’s density goals while preserving high quality natural resources, providing trails, a park and quality architecture. The Zoning Ordinance states that “the rezoning of the property defined in the development plan shall not become effective until such time as the City Council approves an ordinance reflecting said amendment, which shall take place at the time that the City Council approves the final development plan.” The Council should approve the rezoning to be effective at such time as the final PUD development plan is adopted. Preliminary PUD Development Plan The neighborhood will be built over eight years and we can expect that house plans offered by Lennar today may be modified with different options by the time the project is built out. Therefore, it is important to establish basic standards that will carry through development of the PUD rather than approve specific models. The developer has provided example products for discussion, but other house plans could be approved by staff over time. The plan includes: • 265 single family homes (55-, 65- and 75-foot wide lots) • 70 villas (55- and 65-foot wide lots) • 80 twinhomes • 134 townhomes Lot Dimensions and Setbacks The single family and twinhomes are being reviewed against the RSF-3 district standards. The applicant is requesting some flexibility from the lot size and width standards and rear yard setbacks for decks and patios as follows (shown in red): Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 8 June 25, 2020 RSF-3 District Standards Proposed PUD Standards Single Family Two- Family dwellings 75-foot lots (58 homes) 65-foot lots (165 homes) 55-foot lots (51 homes) Villa lots (70 homes) Twin homes (80 homes) Minimum Lot Area 7,500 sq.ft 15,000 sq.ft 9,000 sq. ft. 7,800 sq. ft. 6,600 sq. ft. 7,000 sq.ft. 8,918 sq. ft. (est.) Minimum lot width 65 feet 100 feet 75 feet 65 feet 55 feet 55 feet 39 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet (60 feet with landscaping 100 feet (60 feet with landscaping 100 feet (60 feet with landscaping 100 feet (60 feet with landscaping) n/a Front, From all other streets 20 feet 25 feet 25 feet /20 feet side street 25 feet /20 feet side street 25 feet /20 feet side street 25 feet /20 feet side street 25 feet (25 feet from private drive curb) Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 15 feet N/A 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet n/a Side (living) 10 feet 10 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet Side (garage)** 5 feet 5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet Rear 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet / 20 feet for decks/patios 30 feet / 20 feet for decks/patios 30 feet / 20 feet for decks/patios 30 feet / 20 feet for decks/patios 30 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet *Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. **Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 feet. Staff notes that the smaller lots are consistent with the lot area/width is consistent with other developments in the City. However, the developer did take the July 25, 2019 Council work session comments under advisement and did retain the 15-foot separation between buildings. At that meeting, the Council indicated that the 15 feet between residential buildings was a priority and that the architectural standards in the ordinance (particularly related to the garages was important). There was some willingness to support more garage frontage with a higher level of architectural design in exchange. For these reasons, staff supports this flexibility but has included a condition requiring the developer to update the lot tab to reference the product type on each lot and provide a base lot calculation for the twinhomes. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 9 June 25, 2020 The applicant is requesting that the rear yard setback be reduced from 30 feet to 20 feet for decks and patios. This does reduce the useable rear yard for homeowners. The City did approve a similar setback reduction in Bellwether. • The Commission should discuss and make a recommendation on this request. The townhomes were reviewed against the RMF-1 district standards. The applicant is requesting some flexibility from the side yard setbacks as follows: RMF-1 District Standards Proposed PUD Standards Minimum Lot Area 5,400 sq. ft. per unit 2,100 sq. ft. Minimum lot width n/a n/a Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet 100 feet (60 feet with landscaping) Front, From all other streets 25 feet 25 feet (25 feet from private drive curb) 20 feet from secondary street Side (living) 10 feet 7.5 feet / 15 feet between buildings Rear 25 feet 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet Staff believes that the intent of the per unit sq. ft. requirement as intended to be an average based on the townhome area (a sum of the unit footprints + plus the common areas divided by the number unit). The developer should provide the calculation using this formula. The developer is requesting side yard setback flexibility to allow a minimum of 15 feet between buildings. Staff supports this request but recommends that the setback from all streets (except CR 116) and the perimeter setback be a minimum of 25 feet from streets and other housing product types. Design Standards The applicant has provided some product examples but is not requesting approval of specific products in order to have flexibility to modify product types in response to market demand. If the City can establish clear development standards and expectations, staff supports this approach. The City has adopted design standards as part of the Zoning Ordinance and guidelines as part of the Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines. The developer will be required to show compliance with these standards or request PUD flexibility. All single family and twinhomes are subject to the following standards listed in Section 1040.040, Subd 8: A. Front Elevation: 1. Definition: i. For the purpose of this Section, front elevation shall be the elevation facing the front lot line on the street of the mailing address for the property when the property has more than one front lot line. 2. Materials used: Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 10 June 25, 2020 i. The front elevation shall have material consisting of brick, stone, stucco, fiber cement board, redwood, cedar or other similar materials. A minimum of two different materials is required, except that brick may be used on the entire elevation. ii. Vinyl siding is permitted when combined with the materials listed in Subd. 8.A.2.i of this Section. A minimum of 3 different variations in color, style and/or material is required. For example, if vinyl siding is used, the home shall have combination of each lap, shake or board and batten plus brick or stone. The percentage of each used material/style of materials used shall be shown on the plans. iii. Except for brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone, the front elevation shall have no more than 75% of one type of exterior finish. The percentage of materials used shall be shown on the plans. 3. Architectural Elements: i. The front elevation façade shall consist of doors, windows and variations of the wall face with the use of pilasters or columns, wainscots, canopies or other architectural elements. 4. Design: i. Front elevations shall be varied with a minimum of five different styles provided in the development. ii. Homes in proximity to each other shall not look alike in terms of the combination of color of siding, accent and roofing materials. The home under consideration will be compared to the two homes on each side and to the three homes directly facing it. B. Garages: 1. The garage shall not comprise more than 55 percent of the viewable ground floor street-facing linear building frontage. This standard is based on the measurement of the entire garage structure and not on a measurement of the garage door or doors only. Corner lots are exempt from this requirement on one street elevation. 2. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior design of the home. C. Roof: 1. Roofing materials including asphalt shingles, wood shingles (including shake), concrete, clay, ceramic tile roofs or residential steel roofing material (with hidden fasteners) are required on all roofs. 2. Overhangs must be a minimum of 12 inches. D. Other Elevations: 1. Equal architectural treatment on all sides of the building (materials, articulation, etc.) shall be used for all new residential construction when located on or visible from a street or public park. Each elevation facing a street or public park should use a minimum of 2 different materials and/or styles compatible with the front elevation as described in this Section. All other elevations shall make a good faith effort to demonstrate that elements of the front elevation have been considered for incorporation on these elevations. 2. Each side elevation shall have at least one window or door opening. 3. A maximum of 18 inches of the foundation wall may be exposed on any elevation. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 11 June 25, 2020 These standards apply to the single family homes, villas and twinhomes. The applicant indicates that they are only requesting flexibility from the garage frontage requirements in Section 1040.040, Subd 8 (B) and will comply with all other design standards. In exchange for the flexibility to allow up to 75% of the building front to be garage, they have proposed to provide “decorative garage doors with windows, brackets, handles, etc.”. It is unclear how this is an improvement over the code requirement that “Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior design of the home.” They have also indicated that they will provide: 1. A color or texture change on all sides of the homes such as but not limited to lap siding changes, band boards, board and batten, or shake or scale textures. Variations to exterior siding textures or colors may be horizontal or vertical. 2. 4” LP trim on all windows 3. Optional window grids or optional shutters on some homes. (However, they don’t want to commit to doing this on every home in order to avoid monotony. It is unclear to staff how this could be included as a PUD benefit if it cannot be defined and measured for compliance.) 4. They will comply with the requirement that “Each elevation facing a street or public park should use a minimum of 2 different materials and/or styles compatible with the front elevation as described in this Section”, but do commit to providing building articulation in these areas like they are in Ravinia (which is not required). They would provide window grids or shutters (where appropriate with the, in addition to the color or texture change and 4- inch LP trim on all sides. The submittal included elevations/floor plans for: • Magnolia twinhome (434-474 sq. ft. garages. 56% garage face, not garage forward) • Aspen twinhome (434-474 sq. ft. garages. 56% garage face, not garage forward) • Salerno villa (460-690, 53% 2-car, 79% est. 3-car, option c appears to be garage forward) • Florence villa (483-713, 55% 2-car, 82% est. 3-car, appears to be garage forward) • Unnamed single family home samples (no details provided, but expected 63-75% garage face and several are garage forward) At the July 16, 2019 Council work session on residential design standards with the Planning Commission, the City discussed making changes to the ordinance standards, but ultimately felt they should stay as written. While it was not unanimous, there was consensus that the 15-foot building separation and garage requirements were important to maintain. However, they would consider flexibility if there is a higher quality architecture without garage forward design. The applicant states that the garage forward home styles are desired in the marketplace and would like to keep them as an option. However, they are proposing significantly more garage face than the ordinance allow with limited architectural improvements not required by code. • The City Council should discuss the recommended garage flexibility in the context of the project as a whole and make a recommendation. The Commission could recommend Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 12 June 25, 2020 approval as requested or could recommend approval of the flexibility requested and add a condition that garage forward design is not allowed on homes that exceed the 55% frontage standard. While they have not requested flexibility from this requirement, it seems unlikely that the twinhomes can comply: i. Front elevations shall be varied with a minimum of five different styles provided in the development. ii. Homes in proximity to each other shall not look alike in terms of the combination of color of siding, accent and roofing materials. The home under consideration will be compared to the two homes on each side and to the three homes directly facing it. We have included a condition requiring the applicant to provide a color palette and material sample board to ensure compliance. The standards for townhomes are as follows listed in Section 1040.060, Subd. 9: A. Unit Size: The following unit size shall apply: 1. Floor Area: Five hundred (500) square foot minimum floor area for efficiency apartment units. Minimum eight hundred (800) square feet for a one-bedroom unit plus one hundred (100) square feet for each additional bedroom. Seven hundred (700) square foot minimum floor area for one-bedroom apartment dwelling units in retirement housing developments, plus one hundred (100) square feet for each additional bedroom. Garages, breezeways and porch floor spaces shall not be credited in determining the required floor area of units. B. Unit Construction: 1. Subdivision Requests: Building elevations and floor plans shall be furnished with subdivision requests illustrating exterior building material and colors to demonstrate compliance of this title. Building floor plans shall identify the interior storage space within each unit. 2. Decks or Porches: Provision shall be made for possible decks, porches or additions as part of the initial dwelling unit building plans. The unit lot shall be configured and sized to include decks or porches. 3. Exterior Building Finish: The exterior of attached/townhome dwelling units shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, attached/townhome dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: a. A minimum of twenty five percent (25%) of the combined area of all building facades of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone. b. Except for brick, stucco, and/or natural or artificial stone, no single building facade shall have more than seventy five percent (75%) of one type of exterior finish. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 13 June 25, 2020 c. Except for brick, stucco, and/or natural or artificial stone, no townhome dwelling structure shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of all building facades of one type of exterior finish. d. For the purpose of this Section and material calculations: i. The area of the building facade shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. ii. Variations in texture or style (i.e., lap siding versus shake shingle siding) shall be considered as different materials meeting the requirements of this Section. iii. Integral colored split face (rock face) concrete block or plain concrete block shall not qualify for meeting the brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone material requirements. 4. Color. Each attached/townhome building shall feature a broad array of colors, including earth tones, muted natural colors found in surrounding landscape or other colors consistent with the adjacent neighborhood. Buildings in proximity to each other shall not look alike in terms of the combination of color siding, accent and roofing materials. The home or townhome building under consideration will be compared to two homes or townhome buildings on each side of it and to the three homes or town home buildings directly facing it. 5. Facades and walls: Each attached/townhome dwelling unit shall be articulated with projections, recesses, covered doorways, balconies, covered box or bay windows or other similar features, dividing large facades and walls into human scaled proportions similar to adjacent single-family dwellings. 6. Roofs. Each attached/townhome building shall feature a combination of primary and secondary roofs. Primary roofs shall be articulated by at least one of the following elements: a. Changes in place and elevation b. Dormers or gables c. Transitions to secondary roofs over entrances, garages, porches, bay windows. 7. Garages: a. Each dwelling unit shall include an attached garage. b. Garages shall comply with the following minimum size standards: i. For dwellings with basements: Four hundred forty (440) square feet. ii. For dwellings without basements: Five hundred forty (540) square feet. iii. Garages shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') in width. The applicant is requesting flexibility from the minimum garage standards to allow: • 437 sq. ft. garage where a minimum of 440 sq. ft. is required. • 19 foot wide garages where a minimum of 20 feet of width is required This is the first townhome project and the first time the city is applying these standards. These smaller garages are common in the market today and staff supports the flexibility. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 14 June 25, 2020 The applicant is also requesting flexibility from the townhome architecture standards. They propose to provide a minimum of 6% stone/brick on the front of the building where A minimum of twenty five percent (25%) of the combined area of all building facades of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone. However, they are proposing to increase the stone/brick on the end units to 26.2% of that face. The challenge is that the front elevation is 80% garage face, which makes it difficult to add stone to the front. This standard applies to townhomes and apartments and it is difficult to envision townhomes that could comply. If the stone wainscoting is wrapped around both end units as proposed, staff supports the PUD flexibility based on the finding that the intent of the standard is being met. The applicant did not provide a color palette to ensure compliance with the requirement of B(4) or elevations to ensure compliance with B(5), but we have included a condition to ensure compliance and avoid monotony. Utilities The City Engineer’s memo provides detailed utility comments. This project will extend municipal sewer and water to the site from the Ravinia development to serve this site. Off-site sewer construction is expected to begin this fall and be completed in Spring 2021. The City ordinance requires developers to stub sanitary sewer, water and streets to the property line, which means development of this infrastructure makes development possible for adjacent properties. This utility extension would likely be one of the primary benefits of the PUD. Transportation A number of road improvements are required for this project, including: • Construction of all internal streets • Improvements to County Road 116 • Paving of existing gravel streets o Old Settlers Road from Butterworth Lane to Horseshoe Trail o Horseshoe Trail from Old Settler’s to the east lot line of the Dempsey property • Hackamore improvements, including turn lanes • An emergency vehicle access and future connection to Blue Bonnet • Stub streets to adjacent properties on the west for future connections. As discussed during the EAW for this project, the Comprehensive Plan shows a minor collector street looping through the site to connect County Road 116 to Old Settlers Road. The City Code does not allow homeowners to access directly onto a minor collector street and the location of the existing wetlands limit other access points, which would render much of the site currently owned by Dempsey undevelopable. At its August 22, 2019 meeting, the Corcoran City Council approved a concept plan to shift the minor collector from the location currently shown and plan for a future straight connection along the Horseshoe Trail alignment. This would be a long-term connection as it would require acquisition from existing landowners that are not part of this development. The City would allow Lennar to make the local street connection as shown on the plan and prepare for a future collector street in the modified location. No direct connection from County Road 116 from the new Horseshoe Trail to the existing Horseshoe Trail is planned with this project. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 15 June 25, 2020 The plan shows an 80-foot right-of-way for Horseshoe Trail but all other public streets are shown with a 50-foot right-of-way. A 60-foot right-of-way will be needed for Street L (from Blue Bonnet to Horseshoe Trail on the west side of the site) which has trunk infrastructure that requires a wider right-of-way. Widening of this street will likely affect the lot layout. An additional 50-foot /right-of-way will be dedicated for Hackamore (there is an existing 33 feet in Medina) and is adequate for the planned improvements, including the planned on-road trail. Private drives are proposed for the twinhome area near Outlot H north of the park and the townhome area. The drives are shown as 24 feet wide and would not allow on-street parking. The City Code only allows private drives in the Rural Residential zoning district under certain conditions. When that ordinance was adopted in 2015 staff noted that townhome developments (like those approved in Sawgrass in 2014) often have private drives and we would want to address that in our ordinance. Staff does recommend that we adopt standards for private drives, however, as part of the PUD the City can approve them. As noted during the previous private drive discussion, staff believes it is critical to design the streets to look different than a public street and be clearly identified as private streets, so that homeowners do not request that the City take over ownership at a later date. We believe many of the private drive standards for the RR district an apply to these private drives and we recommend the following standards: • Individual unit driveways that gain access from any such private drive shall be a minimum of 22 feet in length. • A decorative sign stating “Private Drive” shall be located near each entrance to a private drive. Such sign shall also provide the range of addresses served by the private drive. • The private drive must include 20-foot deep concrete apron to distinguish it from the public street. The remainder of the drive may be bituminous or concrete. • No parking may be allowed on the private drive but guest parking will be required adjacent to the private drive. • The HOA documents shall provide a mechanism for maintenance of the private drive in perpetuity. • The private drive shall not be placed on a separate lot or outlot. • The private drive maximum width shall be 24 feet. • Snow storage locations must be shown on the plans. The developer is proposing cul de sac islands in only two locations on the east side of the site. All other cul de sacs will be bituminous only. Where islands are proposed, the HOA shall be responsible for maintenance of these landscape islands. The City Code does not require cul de sac islands but these landscape features were offered as an amenity in Ravinia. • The Planning Commission recommended that landscaped islands to be maintained by the HOA should be added and this condition in reflected in the attached resolution. The City Engineer’s memo provides more detailed transportation comments. The draft resolutions require compliance with the engineer’s memo. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 16 June 25, 2020 Parking The Zoning Ordinance requires two parking spaces per unit plus one space for each of the townhome units. The single family homes can meet their parking requirements with the attached garage and driveway. All driveways in front of garages must be a minimum of 22 feet long to allow a vehicle to park in front of the garage without conflicting with sidewalks and streets. Additionally, on- street parking will be allowed on one side of the 28-foot wide public street. The applicant indicates that garages for twinhomes are 434 – 474 sq. ft. Standard garage doors are 16-feet or 18-feet wide; therefore, we typically see 20-foot x 22-foot (440 sq. ft.) standard garages. The twinhome garage sizes should accommodate two vehicles in the garage and an additional one or two in the driveway. The twinhomes in the NW part of the site are accessed via a public street, which allows on-street parking on one side of the street. However, because the twinhomes in Outlot H are on a private drive, which does not allow on street parking, the developer is proposing 19 parking stalls. This exceeds the townhome guest parking standards, which would only require eight parking stalls. The 134 townhomes in the southeast corner of the site shows 38 guest parking stalls where 27 are required. This complies with the ordinance requirements, but staff recommends that the developer look at driveway 3, which has 18 units but only two guest stalls. At least four guest stalls should be provided to serve 18 units. The number of parking stalls complies with ordinance requirements. Public Safety The public safety committee reviewed this request and provided comments related to public safety access. The memo is attached to this report and compliance is included as a condition of approval in the draft resolution. Existing Easements There is a large electrical Transmission line easement that runs east west through the southern portion of the site. It appears that this easement affects Lots 36, 235 and 236. Elsewhere in the City, staff has seen significant restrictions under the transmission line easement that prohibit permanent structures and limit landscaping. Staff has included a condition that the applicant provide details of this easement and any restrictions to ensure there are no conflicts with the proposed plans. There is another overhead powerline that extends across Horseshoe trail. Section 945.060, Subd. 1 of the City Code requires all utilities within a project to be located underground and where existing facilities exist they must be moved underground. There is a drainage easement near County Road 116 near the Theis property. This easement is shown to remain. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 17 June 25, 2020 New standard drainage and utility easements will be provided with the plat around the perimeter of the lots, over stormwater management ponds and over the wetlands (over the wetland and buffer areas). In the northwest corner of the site, there is a driveway encroachment from the Mattson property over this property up to Blue Bonnet. It appears that this may exist without a formal easement. As part of this plat, the developer must provide an access to the Mattson property west of this site. Stormwater The plans show a number of stormwater ponds on site to comply with City, Watershed and State requirements. Additional details are needed from the applicant to ensure compliance with regulations and manage drainage near adjacent properties during construction. The City Engineer has indicated that offsite improvements will be needed to manage additional drainage and allow the City to implement the compliance with the City’s TMDL. The City Engineer recommends a $100,000 fee for these future improvements. Wetlands The wetland delineation for 25 wetlands was approved in 2019. However, since approval the Theis property was added to the project and the wetland delineation approvals must be amended. The applicant is proposing nearly 3 acres of wetland impact on the site and intends to purchase off- site wetland credits to mitigate for the impact. The mitigation plan must be submitted to the City, the LGU for the Wetland Conservation for review and approval. Section 1050.010 establishes standards for the wetland overlay district. This includes establishment of wetland buffer strips with an average buffer width of 25 feet plus a 15-foot structure setback from the buffer. Wetland buffer signs are required to be installed at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer, and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of 200 feet of wetland edge. The wetland buffer planting and maintenance plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City. The plans must be revised to show compliance with these requirements. It appears that several of the building pads overlap the structure setback requirements; however, they are pad sites not floorplans. Staff has provided the redlined version of the plans to the applicant showing where the constrained lots are and where consideration must be given the home style planned for those lots. PUD flexibility from these standards are not requested or recommended. The codes states that “Patios and decks may encroach up to a maximum of 6 feet into required structure setback areas. Porches may not encroach into required setback areas. Buffer and wetland areas must be kept fee of all structures, including fences and play equipment.” This must be included in the HOA documents. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 18 June 25, 2020 The 15-foot structure setback is reduced to 5 feet for roads and parking lots. Trails that serve an interpretive function are exempt from the setback requirement but must be located outside of the buffer. It appears that there are several areas where the trail is in the wetland buffer and must be shifted. The applicant could also use wetland buffer averaging to reduce the wetland buffer in those areas and make it up in others to allow the trail to remain. Floodplain Section 1050.030 of the City Code establishes the floodplain standards and the Comprehensive Plan shows three floodplain areas in the northern portion of the site generally in the area of the large wetlands. The FEMA floodplain boundary must be shown on the preliminary plat. It appears that there are impacts to the floodplain. A mitigation plan must be prepared for review and approval and FEMA letter of map revision (LOMR) must be coordinated with the City Engineer. Shoreland/Ditch Buffers The property includes shoreland overlay district areas in the northwest portion of the site related to a creek and a portion of property that includes a ditch not defined as shoreland. Both of these areas require a buffer – the shoreland requires a 25-foot average buffer and the ditch requires a 16.5-foot minimum buffer. Additionally, there is a 50-foot structure setback from the OHWL of the creek. The buffer areas must be planted with native buffers are required by Section 1050.020 of the Zoning Ordinance. Buffer monument signs must be installed and the HOA must submit a maintenance plan for the buffer areas for review and approval by the City. The plans must be revised to show the shoreland overlay district, the ditch and all required buffers on preliminary plat. The buffers must be protected by a drainage and utility easement. Natural Resources The Comprehensive Plan includes a Natural Resource Inventory Areas map (Map 1-7) that shows wetlands and woodland areas and an Ecologically Significant Natural Areas map (Map 1-12) that shows Oak Forest, Maple-basswood forest and lowland hardwood forest scattered throughout the site. The City does not have a tree preservation ordinance. However, the applicant has indicated that preservation of a significant portion of these areas is one of the PUD benefits. The plans show preservation of 44% of the ecologically significant areas and 70% of the woodland areas outside of those boundaries, resulting in 52% of the woodland areas on site being preserved. The applicant has generally been able to preserve the woodland areas on the perimeter of the site which will provide a buffer to adjacent properties. The plans must be revised to provide tree protection fencing on the grading plans. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 19 June 25, 2020 Landscaping The developer has provided a robust landscape plan that provides 994 trees where 665 are required and preserves approximately 30 areas of woodland area. The applicant is required to provide one tree for each dwelling unit. These trees are generally proposed to be evenly spaced in the front yard along the street to create a tree lined street canopy. Trees should be planted in the right-of-way for the 80-foot and the 60-foot streets (where there is room for the public infrastructure and the trees) but be placed outside of the right-of-way in the 50- foot wide streets. Staff recommends all trees be planted when the street is completed, but these must be planted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the adjacent home. A setback reduction from 100 feet to 60 feet is requested as allowed by Section 1060 of the Zoning ordinance, which allows the reduction by right if additional landscaping is required. The ordinance requires 1 overstory deciduous tree, 1 overstory coniferous tree, 2 ornamental trees, and 10 understory shrubs per 100 ft. of the project site where the reduction is requested. This would require an additional 29 overstory deciduous trees, 29 overstory coniferous trees, 58 ornamental trees and 290 shrubs for this site. The applicant is proposing instead to provide 49 overstory deciduous trees, 98 conifer trees and 48 ornamental trees. The applicant is proposing to add 20 extra overstory deciduous trees and 69 overstory coniferous trees, but 10 fewer ornamental trees and no shrubs. The deciduous trees are a mix of White Pine, Norway Spruce and Black Hills Spruce. The primary benefit of the shrubs is to provide screening below the tree canopy. However, the additional conifers will provide more year-round screening. • The City Council should discuss whether planting plan for the reduced setbacks is consistent with the intent of the ordinance and provide a recommendation. There is a potential for a conflict with the utilities and landscaping along County Road 116. The applicant and staff will need to work to avoid conflicts and the plans will be revised as required. As noted earlier, the applicant did preserve significant trees along the perimeter of the site. They also added significant landscaping on the north to buffer from the existing homes. Staff recommends additional landscaping be added on the west to buffer from those properties, specifically, • The area behind Lots 376-388 on the west • West of Lot 266 • West of Lots 240-244 • West of Lots 226-228 Lighting No lighting details were provided by the applicant. Street lighting will be provided by Wright Hennepin Electric. Cut sheets for the proposed street lighting shall be provided to the City to ensure compliance with City standards. Streetlights are generally located on the sidewalk side of the street. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 20 June 25, 2020 Lighting will be required on the private streets for safety. Lighting must comply with the lighting requirements of Section 1060.040 of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant must provide lighting details for the townhomes to demonstrate compliance with section 1060.040 of the Zoning Ordinance. Signage Chapter 84 of the City Code regulates signage. The applicant is showing signage in the following locations: • At the NW corner of Hackamore and County Road 116. This indicated as a Corcoran gateway sign • One monument sign at the entrance off Hackamore • Two monument signs at Horseshoe Trail and Street A near the park • One monument sign at the entrance off County Road 116 Section 84.05 of the City Code allows two 32-square-foot signs at the primary entrance of a subdivision and one 16 square-foot sign at a secondary entrance. No details about the signs have been proposed by the applicant as of the date of the report and no PUD flexibility is requested. Staff recommends approval of the project signs at the two entrances (32 sq. ft. at County Road 116 and 16 sq. ft. at Hackamore) and the gateway sign at the corner (size TBD), but not the additional signs at the park entrance. PUD flexibility would be required for the gateway sign depending on the ultimate design and could be approved with the PUD final development plan. Figure 3 - gateway sign concept The ordinance requires signs to be set back 10 feet from the property line and outside the sight visibility triangle. The applicant must show compliance with these setback requirements when the building permit is requested. Figure 1 - entrance sign concept 1 Figure 2 - entrance sign concept 2 Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 21 June 25, 2020 Parks and Trails The 2040 Parks and Trails Plan map shows On Road trails on County Road 116, Hackamore Road and Horseshoe Trail (66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway), which can be accommodated in the right-of- way. There is an Off Road trail running north to south in this area and this trail coincides with the regional trail planned by Three Rivers Park District. The Comprehensive Plan does not indicate any parks in the area, but staff supports the addition of the park within this large development. Neighborhood parks are the most local unit of the park system, providing for the passive and active recreational needs of neighborhood residents. These parks should be accessible to a wide variety of user groups living in the neighborhood. These parks typically do not provide organized athletic programs The developer has proposed to include a 4.06 acre park (Outlot J) and 1.8-miles of trails. Additionally, Outlot K will be deeded to the City to provide access to the park. This will also preserve options for a future extension of Horseshoe Trail should the properties to the west redevelop in the future. Trails and Sidewalks City policy is to require an 8-foot wide trail in a 20-foot easement and give credit for the area of off road trails shown on the Comprehensive Plan. Three Rivers Park District requires a 10-foot trail in a 20-foot easement and that is what will be provided in Tavera. The Comprehensive Plan shows the north/south off road trail west of this site, but staff has worked with the developer to shift the trail into this development and take advantage of the opportunity to build this section of trail with Tavera. Staff recommends the following changes to the trail and sidewalk plan: • Staff recommends that the sidewalk be shifted to the east side of Street A to avoid the trail conflicts. This would require additional driveway street crossings but results in a clearer distinction between the regional trail corridor and neighborhood sidewalks. • Staff recommends that the sidewalk be shifted to the north side of Street K to avoid the trail conflicts. This would result in additional driveway crossings, but would eliminate one street crossing. • Rather than the mid-block crossing in Outlot K south of the planned park, staff recommends that the trail move through the northeast corner of Outlot N and cross at the intersection. • Where the mid-block trail crossing is unavoidable at Street K near Lot 448, staff recommends that the developer work with the City to develop appropriate crossing improvements. The City will coordinate with Three Rivers Park District for precedents. Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 22 June 25, 2020 • Staff recommends that the plans be revised to add additional sidewalk connections from the development to the planned CR 116 trail. The connections should be made generally from the townhome area and a second connection near lot 507. • Additional trail connections should be stubbed to the west at Street G/Trail Lane and at the west side of Outlot K. • Add a sidewalk connection from Street D to Horseshoe Trail (between Lots 162 and 163). • The developer is responsible “for making certain improvements to the developments for park, playground, trail and public open space purposes, including, but not limited to, finished grading and ground cover for all park, playground, trail and public open spaces within their developments. No credit toward the required dedication shall be given for this work. The City reserves the right to pave the trails or require the developer to pave these off-road trails. Should the City require the developer to pave the trails, the City shall reimburse the Developer for the costs for paving of the trail.” Staff recommends that the developer pave the trails within the development and be reimbursed by the City following acceptance of the trails. Trails will be maintained by the City according to City trail policy and sidewalks will be maintained by the HOA or homeowners. The HOA documents will need to clearly define this responsibility. Park Dedication The applicant is showing dedication of a 4.06-acre park. Staff notes Wildflower Park in Ravinia is 5.13 acres, but due to the odd shape, wetland and ponding has only about one acre of usable park land. The Comprehensive Plan says that neighborhood parks are generally 5-20 acres in size, but staff would support acceptance of the proposed park to serve the needs of the neighborhood. Staff recommends that: • the plans be revised to show general park area on the east with a 6-8 stall parking lot on the west • the trail wind through the site rather than along Outlot K • provide a trail or sidewalk connection to the park between lots 256 and 257 • As one of the benefits of the PUD, the developer should provide access to the parking lot with driveway in Outlot K, pave the parking lot in addition to the required grading of the park site The developer is showing signage at the intersection of Horseshoe/Street A. There will be a city park sign in the northwest corner but a development sign will not be allowed in those locations. Park Dedication Calculation The City should accept park dedication in the form of land where shown on the maps. The City may accept cash-in-lieu of land if park dedication requirements are not met by the land dedication. The plans show a gross land area of 273.57 acres and 192.53 pre-development net acres. The park dedication ordinance requires 15% of the land area (or the market value of that land). In this case, the developer would be required to dedicate: Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 23 June 25, 2020 • 15% of 192.53 acres = 28.88 acres If the developer’s calculations are correct, they are proposing to dedicate 5.86 acres (4.06 acres of park and 1.8 acres of trail). Additional information is required from the developer to confirm the gross and net acres. Credit is given for net acreage only. This would provide 20.29% of the required park dedication. Therefore, the remaining 79.71% of the park dedication would be cash. The current park dedication fee is proposed to be amended at June 11th Council meeting to reflect the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed fees are $4,628 per single family unit and $3,141 per multi-family unit. Park dedication will be based on the park dedication fee in place at the time the plat is released for filing, but for discussion purposes the formula would be: 335 single family/villas x $4,628 = $1,550,380 80 twinhomes x $4,628 = $370,240 134 townhomes x $3,141 = $420,897 TOTAL = $2,341,514 Less 20.29% = $475,093.19 Remaining Cash Due: $1,886,420.81 The final park dedication calculation will be based on final land area calculations and the fee schedule in place at the time of release of the final plat. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat is for 549 lot and 22 outlots. The applicant has requested PUD flexibility from the minimum lot size requirements as noted earlier in the PUD section of the staff report. The approval conditions recommended in this staff report and draft resolutions will likely result in changes to the lot layout and may also affect the unit count. The phasing plan shows 8 project phases generally moving west to east and south to north. The developer’s phasing plan may change based on market conditions, but staff notes that infrastructure improvements are tied to the timing of infrastructure needs. The concept plan review asked for a ghost plat of the Mattson property located to the west to ensure that the proposed street stub will allow for a future extension. This ghost plat must be submitted for City review and approval. It is City policy to allow grading to begin after approval of the final plat for each phase. The applicant has expressed a desire to allow grading after preliminary plat for an area larger than the initial phase. However, they have not yet provided a specific request with rational for modifying the City policy. Therefore, at this time staff continues to recommend compliance with current policies. Conclusion There are a number of issues that must be addressed and many of those will result in changes to the development lot layout. Staff is comfortable that the draft resolutions include conditions necessary to bring the project into compliance with City standards (as amended by the PUD). The applicant will need to work closely with staff to resolve the outstanding issues prior to submitting a Tavera CPA, RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-017) 24 June 25, 2020 final plat and final PUD development plan. When those plans are received they will be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council to ensure compliance with the conditions in the preliminary approvals. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: a. Resolution 2020-48 approving comprehensive plan amendment b. Ordinance 2020-408 rezoning to PUD c. Summary ordinance 2020-409 approving rezoning d. Resolution 2020-49 approving findings of fact for rezoning e. Resolution 2020-50 approving preliminary PUD development plan f. Resolution 2020-51 approving preliminary plat Attachments 1. Resolution 2020-48 approving comprehensive plan amendment 2. Ordinance 2020-408 rezoning to PUD 3. Summary ordinance 2020-409 approving rezoning 4. Resolution 2020-49 approving findings of fact for rezoning 5. Resolution 2020-50 approving preliminary PUD development plan 6. Resolution 2020-51 approving preliminary plat 7. Site Location Map 8. Engineer’s Memo dated May 28, 2020 9. Public Safety memo dated May 7, 2020 10. Hennepin County memo dated June 4, 2020 11. Applicant’s Narrative dated May 11, 2020 12. Plan drawings dated April 21, 2020 13. Tree preservation plan dated May 20, 2020 14. Woodland Assessment dated October 28, 2019 15. Letter from Lanterman dated June 3, 2020 16. Email from Lanterman dated June 4, 2020 City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-48 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR “TAVERA” AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HACKAMORE ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD 116 (PID 35-119-23- 44-0001, 35-119-23-11-0001, 35-119-23-12-0002, 35-119-23-41-0001 AND 35-119-23-43- 0001) (CITY FILE 20-017) WHEREAS, U.S. Home Corporation dba Lennar has requested a Sanitary Sewer Staging plan amendment to move approximately 96 acres of land from the 2035-2040 stage up to the 2020- 2025 stage on land legally described as follows: Lot 10, Block 1, Meadow Trails, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the requested amendments at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; WHEREAS, the property’s Agricultural Preserve land use designation expired on April 27, 2020 and was reclassified as Low Density Residential as described in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan making the land available for development; WHEREAS, the development project includes the addition of a new neighborhood park and the City will amend the Parks and Trails plan to reflect this additional park after dedication of the land; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a comprehensive plan amendment for the above referenced parcel, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 1. The property is located in an area where municipal sewer and water can be made available as part of this development. 2. Reclassifying this site is needed to allow reasonable development of the site that responds to current market conditions. 3. Development of the site as part the larger development would facilitate other planned infrastructure improvements, including stormwater improvements, sanitary sewer extension, municipal water extension and transportation improvements that will have regional benefits. 4. With the planned infrastructure improvements developed with this project, there is adequate public infrastructure planned to serve the site. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-48 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of June 2020. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2020-408 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HACKAMORE ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD 116 (PID 35-119-23-44-0001, 35-119-23-11-0001, 35-119-23-12- 0002, 35-119-23-41-0001 AND 35-119-23-43-0001) (CITY FILE 20-017) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Corcoran Zoning Map from Urban Reserve (UR) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), legally described as follows: See Attachment A Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon adoption of the resolution approving the final PUD development plan for this project. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of June 2020. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2020-408 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT A East 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: Lot 10, Block 1, Meadow Trails, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The East 1/2 of the Northeast Quarter except that part which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line, Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT: The East Sixteen (16) rods of the North Twenty (20) rods of the South Twenty-nine and eight tenths (29.8) rods of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section Thirty- five (35), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty-three (23). AND FURTHER EXCEPT: All that part of the following described tract: Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 and the South 9 8/10 rods of Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 also that part of North 20 rods of South 29 8/10 rods of the Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 lying West of East 16 rods thereof and that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 lying North of South 29 8/10 rods thereof, all lying in Section 35, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, except roads; which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line of said section. Together with: The East 16 Rods of North 20 Rods of South 29.8 Rods of Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4, Section 35, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, except that part which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line of said section, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2020-409 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2020-408 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP IN TITLE IX OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 20-017) Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Corcoran Zoning Map from Urban Reserve (UR) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of June 2020. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-49 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HACKAMORE ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD 116 (PID 35-119-23- 44-0001, 35-119-23-11-0001, 35-119-23-12-0002, 35-119-23-41-0001 AND 35-119-23-43- 0001) (CITY FILE 20-017) WHEREAS, U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) (“the applicant”) has requested approval to rezone 273.57 acres legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcels from Urban Reserve (UR) to Planned Unit Development (PUD); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the request of U.S. Home Corporation for the reclassification of the property, based on the following findings and conditions: 1. The planned unit development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed pre-development net density is 2.85 units per acre, when the post- development area is calculated we expect it will be within the 3-5 units per acre expected in the Low Density Residential land use classification. The plan incorporates the trail, park and street connections anticipated within the site and preserves significant portions of the existing natural resources on site. 2. The planned development of 549 homes is consistent with the intent of the RSF-3 and RMF-1 districts and the Comprehensive Plan goals to provide a variety of housing options.. The applicant is requesting approval of PUD zoning for design flexibility to allow for modification to the architectural standards, provide a mix of lot sizes and reduced setbacks for this neighborhood at a density consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer will provide both internal infrastructure needed to support their development and off-site street improvements, a new neighborhood park and trunk infrastructure improvements that will serve a larger development area. 4. The planned development is feasible without dependence upon any other subsequent phase. The project has an 8-year phasing plan and development is contingent upon completion of trunk infrastructure improvements and water service. The initial phase will include the construction of the primary project infrastructure, roadway improvements on City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-49 Page 2 of 3 County Road 116 at the main entrance and other key public infrastructure improvements. 5. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing public trails consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and a new City park. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve this site at the developer’s expense. 6. The planned development is a residential neighborhood developed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore, will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. 7. The quality of the site design proposed by the PUD shall enhance the aesthetics of the site, install and provide streets, utilities and public facilities that may not otherwise be installed and create public benefit that is greater than would otherwise be achieved due to the construction and financing of all related infrastructure improvements. The development will meet the City’s density goals while preserving high quality natural resources, providing trails, a park and quality architecture. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of June 2020. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-49 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A East 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: Lot 10, Block 1, Meadow Trails, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The East 1/2 of the Northeast Quarter except that part which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line, Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT: The East Sixteen (16) rods of the North Twenty (20) rods of the South Twenty-nine and eight tenths (29.8) rods of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section Thirty- five (35), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty-three (23). AND FURTHER EXCEPT: All that part of the following described tract: Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 and the South 9 8/10 rods of Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 also that part of North 20 rods of South 29 8/10 rods of the Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 lying West of East 16 rods thereof and that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 lying North of South 29 8/10 rods thereof, all lying in Section 35, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, except roads; which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line of said section. Together with: The East 16 Rods of North 20 Rods of South 29.8 Rods of Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4, Section 35, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, except that part which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line of said section, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-50 Page 1 of 9 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMINARY PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR “TAVERA” ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HACKAMORE ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD 116 (PID 35-119-23-44-0001, 35-119-23-11-0001, 35-119-23-12-0002, 35-119-23-41-0001 AND 35-119-23-43-0001) (CITY FILE 20-017) WHEREAS, U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) (“the applicant”) has requested approval of “Tavera” a residential subdivision on property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the Corcoran City Council approves the request, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary PUD development plan is approved to create 549 lots and 22 outlots for “Tavera”, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on April 21, 2020 and revision received on May 19, 2020, May 20, 2020 and May 26, 2020, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning and preliminary plat. 3. Approval is subject to compliance with the mitigation strategies outlined in the EAW and identified in the record of decision. 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Public Safety memo, dated May 7, 2020. 5. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo, dated May 28, 2020. 6. The application is subject to review and approval by Hennepin County. The applicant is required to obtain permits and approvals from the County as needed. 7. The preliminary PUD development plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 8. The shoreland overlay district boundary must be clearly shown on the site plans. 9. The required buffers for the shoreland district and the ditch must be clearly shown on the site plan. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-50 Page 2 of 9 a. The shoreland requires a 25-foot average buffer b. The ditch requires a 16.5-foot minimum buffer c. There is a 50-foot structure setback from the OHWL of the creek in the shoreland district d. Required buffers must be planted with native buffers as required by Section 1050.020 e. Buffer monument signs must be installed in accordance with Section 1050.020. 10. PUD flexibility is granted to establish the following lot standards for this development: 75-foot lots (58 homes) 65-foot lots (165 homes) 55-foot lots (51 homes) Villa lots (70 homes) Twin homes (80 homes) Townhomes Minimum Lot Area 9,000 sq. ft. 7,800 sq. ft. 6,600 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft. TBD - 8,918 sq. ft. (est.) TBD Minimum lot width 75 feet 65 feet 55 feet 55 feet 39 feet n/a Front, From Major Roadways* 60 feet 60 feet 60 feet 60 feet 60 feet 60 feet Front, From all other streets 25 feet /20 feet side street 25 feet /20 feet side street 25 feet /20 feet side street 25 feet /20 feet side street 25 feet (25 feet from private drive curb) 25 feet from public ROW (25 feet from private drive curb) Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet n/a Side (living) 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet Side (garage)** 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet Rear 30 feet / 20 feet for deck/patios 30 feet / 20 feet for deck/patios 30 feet / 20 feet for deck/patios 30 feet / 20 feet for deck/patios 30 feet / 20 feet for deck/patios 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet *Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. (reduction from 100 feet to 60 feet per Section 1060.070, Subd.K) **Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 feet. 11. All garages must have a minimum 22-foot wide parking area between the garage and right-of-way that does not overlap into sidewalks, drives or streets. 12. Mechanical equipment (including air conditioning units) must be located in the side or rear yard. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-50 Page 3 of 9 13. Driveways may not encroach in the drainage and utility easements on the side yards. 14. The applicant shall provide details of the driveway, house pads, and setbacks as part of their final PUD Plan application that demonstrate compliance with the approved PUD standards. 15. The developer must update the lot tabulation to reference product type for each lot and provide a base lot calculation for the twinhomes and townhomes. Architectural and Design standards 16. The single family, villa and twinhomes must comply with the standards in Section 1040.040, Subd. 8, except as specifically modified by this resolution. 17. The townhomes must comply with the standards in Section 1040.060, Subd. 9, except as specifically modified by this resolution. 18. PUD flexibility is provided to allow the face of the garage to exceed 55% of the building face for the single family, villa and twinhome units. In exchange for this flexibility: a. Garage door colors shall be compatible with the building colors. b. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior of the home. c. The garage must not extend in front of the home (including the front porch) on homes that exceed 55% garage face. 19. PUD flexibility is provided to allow minimum garage size of less than 440 sq. ft. and a garage width of less than 20 feet for the townhomes. a. The garages shall be a minimum of 420 sq. ft. each b. The garage width shall be a minimum of 19 feet. 20. PUD flexibility is provided to allow less than twenty five percent (25%) of the combined area of all building facades of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone for the townhomes. a. The applicant shall provide stone/brick wainscoting along the entire front and sides, which will result in 6-9% stone/brick on the front and 26.2% on the sides b. No stone/brick will be provided on the rear elevation. c. The applicant must provide elevations ensure the rear elevation provides “projections, recesses, covered doorways, balconies, covered box or bay windows or other similar features, dividing large facades and walls into human scaled proportions similar to adjacent single-family dwellings” as required by ordinance. 21. In exchange for the PUD flexibility for the single family, villa and twinhome units: a. A color or texture change shall be provided on all sides of the homes such as but not limited to lap siding changes, band boards, board and batten, or shake or scale textures. Variations to exterior siding textures or colors may be horizontal or vertical. b. A 4” LP trim on all windows on all elevations. c. Optional window grids or optional shutters on some homes. The developer shall work with staff to better define this application prior to final PUD application. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-50 Page 4 of 9 22. The applicant must submit a color palette and material sample board to ensure compliance with Section 1040.040, Subd. 8 (A)4 for the single family, villa and twinhome units and with Section 1040.060, Subd. 9(B) 4 and 5 for the townhomes. 23. Building plans must provide elevations with colors, material details and percentages on the elevations to confirm compliance with ordinance standards. 24. The plans show centralized mailbox locations. These mailbox locations shall be approved by the US Postal Service and proof of the approved locations provided to the City, prior to release of the final plat. Landscaping and Lighting 25. Plans shall be revised to show proposed street lighting. 26. The applicant shall finalize the fixtures proposed in the submittal and provide detailed specifications that demonstrate compliance with 1060.040 (Lighting) of the Zoning Ordinance for the project. 27. Lawn sprinklers/irrigation systems (if provided) shall all have rain sensors to limit unnecessary watering. 28. The HOA shall be responsible for maintenance of: a. Landscaping and any irrigation in the cul de sac islands b. Landscaping and any irrigation in the common areas c. Wetland/pond buffer areas d. Sidewalks e. All common areas, including signage, lighting and landscaping in those areas. 29. PUD flexibility to allow the reduced setback along County Road 101 as allowed by City Code Section 1060.070, Subd. K is approved with the landscaping as proposed. 30. The applicant shall work with staff to ensure that the landscaping proposed in the northeast portion of the site does not conflict with utilities. 31. Trees should be planted in the right-of-way for the 80-foot and the 60-foot streets (where there is room for the public infrastructure and the trees) but be placed outside of the right- of-way in the 50-foot wide streets. a. Trees must be planted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the adjacent home. 32. Any request to for the City to inspect the required landscaping in order to reduce financial guarantees must be accompanied by recertification/verification of field inspection by the project Landscape Architect. A letter signed by the project Landscape Architect verifying plantings (including wetland and pond buffers) have been correctly installed in compliance with the plans and specifications will suffice. 33. Signage is approved for the following: a. A 32 sq. ft. project sign at the County Road 116 entrance b. A 16 sq. ft. project sign at the Hackamore Road entrance City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-50 Page 5 of 9 c. A Corcoran Gateway sign at the corner of Hackamore/CR 116 with a final design and size to be determined by the City Council. d. Sign permits will be required prior to construction of any signs. 34. Woodland areas shown as preserved on the plans must be protected. a. Tree preservation fencing must be shown on the plans and installed on site. b. Tree preservation areas must be protected by a permanent conservation easement. The developer shall draft a conservation easement for review and approval by the City. c. The conservation easement areas shall be managed by the HOA. A maintenance plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City. 35. Additional landscaping should be added on the west to buffer from those properties, specifically, a. West of Lots 490-501 b. West of Lots 376-388 c. West of Lot 266 d. West of Lots 240-246 e. West of Lots 226-228. Wetlands 36. The wetland delineation approvals must be updated to include the Theis property. 37. The wetland mitigation plan must be approved prior to submittal of the final PUD application. 38. A wetland buffer planting plan and maintenance plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City. 39. The site plan must show the wetland buffers and setbacks with the house pads. 40. Trails shall not be located in wetland buffer areas. Trails are required to comply with the 5-foot buffer setback. 41. Section 1050.010 requires a 15-foot structure setback, but allows patios and decks to encroach a maximum of 6 feet into required structure setback. 42. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. a. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. b. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. c. Monuments and signs shall be installed prior to approval of the building permit. Streets, Parking and Utilities 43. The development shall comply with the City’s requirements regarding fire access, fire protection and fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, fire department connections and fire lane signage. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-50 Page 6 of 9 44. Street names shall be revised to comply with the city naming policy. 45. Parking shall be permitted on one side of the local streets and shall be signed in accordance with city standards. 46. The guest parking for the townhomes should be revised to provide at least 4 guest parking stalls on driveway 3. 47. Private drives shall be allowed for the two townhome and twinhome neighborhoods shown on the plans. Plans must be revised to comply with the following standards: a. Individual unit driveways that gain access from any such private drive shall be a minimum of 22 feet in length. b. A decorative sign stating “Private Drive” shall be located near each entrance to a private drive. Such sign shall also provide the range of addresses served by the private drive. c. The private drive must include 20-foot deep concrete apron to distinguish it from the public street. The remainder of the drive may be bituminous or concrete. d. No parking may be allowed on the private drive but guest parking will be required adjacent to the private drive. e. The HOA documents shall provide a mechanism for maintenance of the private drive in perpetuity. f. The private drive shall not be placed on a separate lot or outlot. g. The private drive maximum width shall be 24 feet. h. Snow storage locations must be shown on the plans. 48. There are several areas where townhome private drives appear to overlap when they reach the street. Plans should ensure separation to eliminate these conflicts. 49. Utilities shall be stubbed to the property lines for future extension to adjacent properties. The stubs shall be at the developer’s expense. 50. All utility facilities shall be located underground. 51. Barricades and signage indicating future extension shall be installed, consistent with Section 945.010, Subd. 19 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 52. The developer must provide easement or other tool to retain access to Blue Bonnet from the Mattson property. 53. Access to Blue Bonnet shall be an emergency vehicle access/trail until Blue Bonnet is improved to the north and the streets will connect at that time. 54. Cul de sacs shall include a landscaped cul de sac island. a. The HOA shall be responsible for maintenance of the islands and shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City. b. Revised plans showing the islands and proposed landscaping shall be submitted with the PUD final plat for review and approval by the City. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-50 Page 7 of 9 Park Dedication 55. Park Dedication will be satisfied by dedication of neighborhood park land, off road trail and cash-in-lieu of land, subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall provide a final calculation of the net and gross acreage of project, park and trail easement to staff prior to final plan and final PUD plan submittal. b. The developer shall dedicate the Outlots J and K to the City. Park dedication credit shall be granted for the net area of Outlot J. c. The developer shall dedicate 20-foot easements for all off-road trails and shall be given land dedication credit for the net area of these easements d. The developer shall construct all trails and sidewalks shown on the plan, except the on-road trails on County Road 101 and Hackamore Road. e. The developer shall adjust trail and sidewalk alignment and provide connections as recommended by staff in the June 25, 2020 staff report. f. The developer shall construct a 6-8 stall parking area on the west side of the proposed park. g. The developer shall provide a concept plan for a neighborhood park planned for Outlot J. h. The trail shall be revised to wind through the site rather than along Outlot K i. The developer shall provide a trail or sidewalk connection to the park between lots 256 and 257 j. The developer should provide access to the parking lot with driveway in Outlot K, pave the parking lot in addition to the required grading of the park site k. Park dedication shall be subject to park dedication fees in place when the final plat is released for recording. Miscellaneous 56. The developer shall provide a ghost plat for the Mattson property to the west. 57. The final plat and final PUD plan application shall be consistent with the conditions of this resolution. 58. Assessments are due for the property (PID 35-119-23-44-0001) and must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 59. The transmission line easement documents must be submitted to the City for review. The plans must comply with any easement restrictions. 60. The applicant shall provide copies of the final HOA documents/covenants for City review as part of the final PUD application. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-50 Page 8 of 9 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of June 2020. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-50 Page 9 of 9 ATTACHMENT A East 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: Lot 10, Block 1, Meadow Trails, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The East 1/2 of the Northeast Quarter except that part which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line, Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT: The East Sixteen (16) rods of the North Twenty (20) rods of the South Twenty-nine and eight tenths (29.8) rods of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section Thirty- five (35), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty-three (23). AND FURTHER EXCEPT: All that part of the following described tract: Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 and the South 9 8/10 rods of Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 also that part of North 20 rods of South 29 8/10 rods of the Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 lying West of East 16 rods thereof and that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 lying North of South 29 8/10 rods thereof, all lying in Section 35, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, except roads; which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line of said section. Together with: The East 16 Rods of North 20 Rods of South 29.8 Rods of Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4, Section 35, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, except that part which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line of said section, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-51 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR “TAVERA” ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HACKAMORE ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD 116 (PID 35-119-23- 44-0001, 35-119-23-11-0001, 35-119-23-12-0002, 35-119-23-41-0001 AND 35-119-23-43- 0001) (CITY FILE 20-017) WHEREAS, U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) (“the applicant”) has requested approval of “Tavera” a residential subdivision on property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to create 549 lots and 22 outlots for “Tavera”, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on April 21, 2020 and revision received on May 19, 2020, May 20, 2020 and May 26, 2020, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the preliminary PUD development plan for Tavera. The developer shall comply with all conditions of preliminary PUD development plan approval (Resolution 2020-50). 3. Park dedication is due as required by the PUD approvals, prior to release of the final plat for recording. 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo, dated May 28, 2020. 5. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of June 2020. City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-51 Page 2 of 3 ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran June 25, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-51 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A East 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: Lot 10, Block 1, Meadow Trails, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The East 1/2 of the Northeast Quarter except that part which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line, Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT: The East Sixteen (16) rods of the North Twenty (20) rods of the South Twenty-nine and eight tenths (29.8) rods of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section Thirty- five (35), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty-three (23). AND FURTHER EXCEPT: All that part of the following described tract: Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 and the South 9 8/10 rods of Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 also that part of North 20 rods of South 29 8/10 rods of the Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 lying West of East 16 rods thereof and that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 lying North of South 29 8/10 rods thereof, all lying in Section 35, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, except roads; which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line of said section. Together with: The East 16 Rods of North 20 Rods of South 29.8 Rods of Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4, Section 35, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, except that part which lies East of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet West of the East line of said section, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Hennepin County Property Map Date: 5/11/2020 Comments: 1 inch = 1,600 feet PARCEL ID: 3511923120002 OWNER NAME: Richard L Dempsey Et Al Trst PARCEL ADDRESS: 52 Address Unassigned, Corcoran MN 00000 PARCEL AREA: 96.01 acres, 4,182,374 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: $750,001 SALE DATA: 08/2008 SALE CODE: Vacant Land ASSESSED 2019, PAYABLE 2020 PROPERTY TYPE: Ag Preserve HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $440,700 TAX TOTAL: $3,032.10 ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Ag Preserve HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $452,700 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2020 WENCK File #2294-0055 May 2020 Prepared by: WENCK Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Corcoran, MN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Engineer’s Report for Preliminary Plat of Tavera Development May 2020 i \\wenck.local\wenckspace\Vol1\2294-Corcoran\20-500 Tavera Lennar\Draft Engineer Report for Preliminary Plat.docx Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................1-1 2.0 TRANSPORTATION......................................................................................2-1 2.1 General.............................................................................................2-1 2.2 Streets/ROW......................................................................................2-2 2.3 Hackamore ROW ................................................................................2-2 2.4 CR 116..............................................................................................2-2 3.0 SEWER ........................................................................................................3-1 3.1 General.............................................................................................3-1 3.2 Off site service and Trunk System Summary ..........................................3-1 3.3 On Site Sewer Temporary Lift Station and Forcemain .............................3-1 3.4 Stubs to Adjacent Properties ................................................................3-1 4.0 WATER........................................................................................................4-1 4.1 General.............................................................................................4-1 4.2 Identified Issues.................................................................................4-1 5.0 WATER RESOURCES ....................................................................................5-1 5.1 General.............................................................................................5-1 5.2 drainage patterns ...............................................................................5-1 5.3 Identified Issues.................................................................................5-1 5.4 Guidance...........................................................................................5-1 APPENDICES A Feasibility Study B Engineering Plan Markups by Area C Floodplain, Drainage Areas, Initial Review, and Model Schematics May 2020 1-1 \\wenck.local\wenckspace\Vol1\2294-Corcoran\20-500 Tavera Lennar\Draft Engineer Report for Preliminary Plat.docx 1.0 Introduction This Engineer’s Review of the Preliminary Plat plans for Tavera development in Corcoran reviews the development’s layout of infrastructure, ROW, lot lines, easements, access points and general compliance with City practices, policies and guidelines. The Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment Worksheet were reviewed for development requirements. The report is divided into sections regarding Transportation, Sewer, Water, Stormwater and projects in support of the development. General Findings Ghost platting of adjacent parcels will be reviewed to allow for accurate identification of street and utility connections. Existing neighborhoods will also be reviewed for location of utility stubs at the Tavera limits. The Exception parcel along CR 116 has been incorporated into the development. Stormwater modeling shall be revised since the complex stormwater interconnections require a more technically advanced model. This is typical of large developments with ponds, wetlands and adjacent floodplains. County review and approval will determine County access and road improvement requirements. Developer’s phases may change, however the infrastructure improvements are connected to the timing of infrastructure needs. Sidewalks and Trails are not covered extensively in this review. Several connections and modifications are necessary. Easements need modification which will affect lot layouts or the overall lot count due to deep pipes or alignment. Deeper pipes require wider easements. Trunk sewer systems influence the ROW required for streets or utility easement widths. Infrastructure Improvements Necessary The following is a summary of necessary infrastructure improvements (also in Feasibility Study) to manage the impact of the development: County Road 116 improvements (See transportation section) Investigate potential of traffic control signal at main entrance Hackamore Improvements and turn lane Paving of existing gravel roads Trunk Sewer offsite construction Trunk Sewer onsite construction Temporary lift station and forcemain Trunk water installation and easement for City trunk water project Floodplain (FEMA) process Participate in funding of a water quality project for City regulatory commitments May 2020 2-1 \\wenck.local\wenckspace\Vol1\2294-Corcoran\20-500 Tavera Lennar\Draft Engineer Report for Preliminary Plat.docx 2.0 Transportation 2.1 GENERAL The plan set dated 4-21-20 was reviewed for Preliminary Plat broader issues such as right of way (ROW), street alignment, utilities and drainage but also included some review of design and construction details typical of City practices. Markups for the engineering plans are in Appendix B and organized by location in the development The review items are provided with an emphasis towards platting information. Additional review comments will be made during subsequent revisions and some more detailed review categories are identified as “To Be Determined” or TBD. Improvements that apply from the Feasibility Study include: 66th Avenue Collector Street Dedicate 80 foot ROW to preserve future road corridor options. Main development access/CR 116 County is expected to require a right turn lane on southbound approach and a left turn lane on northbound approach for the development. Construct west leg of intersection (66th Ave. extended) at CR 116 with a left turn lane and a right/through lane. Construction of east leg of CR 116 intersection is planned as part of Ravinia development. Future signal was planned with Ravinia and City will pursue County process involving warrants and County policy for installation of a signal at developer cost. County Road 116/Hackamore Road Improve Hackamore Road to collector standard to west development property boundary (west of the development’s local street connection). On Hackamore, construct left turn and right turn lanes on both the east leg and west leg of intersection. This will require coordination with the County and City of Medina regarding right-of-way acquisition, impacts and design details. Install updated traffic signal control and mitigate trail and any ponding/wetland impacts. County approval is required and that process may require additional turn lanes on CR 116. Old Settlers Road north of Butterworth Lane Based on the expected traffic volume increase, pave existing gravel road from north of Butterworth Lane to Horseshoe Trail. Horseshoe Trail Based on the expected traffic volume increase, pave existing gravel road from Old Settlers Road to the development’s east property boundary. Blue Bonnet Drive Provide ROW and a turnaround meeting City standards at connection to Bluebonnet. Local access to adjacent parcels May 2020 2-2 \\wenck.local\wenckspace\Vol1\2294-Corcoran\20-500 Tavera Lennar\Draft Engineer Report for Preliminary Plat.docx Ghost plat and provide ROW for access points to the adjacent properties. Trail Lane ROW ROW should be extended towards cul-de-sac on Trail Lane with street or trail improvements to be considered during plan review process. Local Street Spacing Plan review process may modify local street intersection spacing. 2.2 STREETS/ROW The plans were reviewed and comments are made during initial plan reviews. Streets / Right of Way / Private Drives 80 feet at the main entrance o ROW provided as required, however the major utilities may be modified and initiate other easement needs. o Center median is TBD (east of CR 116 has median and so does Ravinia/101). 50 feet ROW on other City streets o Is sufficient unless containing trunk sewer 60 feet ROW is necessary for trunk sewer streets Private drives are 24 feet face to face, o Amount of spaces in parking stall areas is TBD. Blue Bonnet connection ROW is sufficient as shown o Additional review for alignment and improvements are TBD. Street K length of stub towards property line is TBD. Street G length of stub towards property line is TBD. CR 116 emergency access locations may be additionally reviewed by Public Safety. North cul de sac along CR 116 may need second access. Flat streets (0.5%) should be avoided and minimum slope of 1% should be used. Any slope below 2% requires additional CBs and stormsewer. 2.3 HACKAMORE ROW ROW dedicated along Hackamore is sufficient at 50 feet and combined with existing Medina ROW (33 feet) totals 83 feet. 2.4 CR 116 The County regulates CR 116 improvements at the main entrance and Hackamore/CR 116 intersection. These designs will be implemented per the Feasibility Study and for CR 116 requires coordination with Medina for the ongoing Hackamore Improvement project extending to CSAH 101. A traffic control signal will be investigated at developer cost for main entrance. May 2020 3-1 \\wenck.local\wenckspace\Vol1\2294-Corcoran\20-500 Tavera Lennar\Draft Engineer Report for Preliminary Plat.docx 3.0 Sewer 3.1 GENERAL Phases 1 and 2 (south of Horseshoe Trail) are serviced through the Ravinia system and to the MCES lift station L-80 at the Maple Grove border along CR 10. The ultimate service point or Phases 3 through 8 of Tavera is to the north (Blue Bonnet) which connects to the MCES system at the northeast corner of Corcoran. General conditions for the Preliminary Plat are as follows: Construct trunk system as required by City, with overdepth and oversize being credited from Trunk Line Area Charge (TLAC) fees Trunk sewer requires 60-foot street ROW Lateral sewer greater than 25 feet requires 60-feet ROW Extend service stubs to adjacent properties and neighborhoods 3.2 OFF SITE SERVICE AND TRUNK SYSTEM SUMMARY The City’s trunk plan requires sewer service as follows: Offsite sewer construction to connect to Ravinia is expected to begin Fall 2020 with completion in the Winter/Spring 2021. Trunk system will be extended with 15-inch westerly towards Horseshoe Trail with 12-inch branches south and west (location TBD) near Horseshoe Trail. Upsize and overdepth costs are credited. 3.3 ON SITE SEWER TEMPORARY LIFT STATION AND FORCEMAIN Lift station construction timing is shown as being required for Phase 3 with the final forcemain route TBD. Costs are not eligible for credit since the system is considered temporary. o From the lift station plans should be modified to extend the 15-inch stub north from the lift station to Tavera property line. o Inflow invert is 955 (not sump invert) which affects pipe depth shown on plans. o Lift station will be required to be built similar to City lift stations with standby generator (natural gas), control building, etc. 3.4 STUBS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES Stubs to service adjacent neighborhoods and properties shall be installed as directed by City. A few items were observed: Ghost platting will be reviewed to allow for correct location. The neighborhood of Elm Street / Valley View and Trail Lane can be serviced (in the future) at the north end of Snyder Road, which can connect west/northwest to the Horseshoe Trail Trunk line (extended). May 2020 4-1 \\wenck.local\wenckspace\Vol1\2294-Corcoran\20-500 Tavera Lennar\Draft Engineer Report for Preliminary Plat.docx 4.0 Water 4.1 GENERAL The water supply for the Tavera development is the SE Corcoran connection to Maple Grove at the city border (north of Lions Park along CR 10). A City 2020 project will install trunk water main from 75th Avenue (downtown Corcoran) along CR 116 to the main entrance of Tavera. This line was planned for Ravinia looping and Tavera will also benefit. Important coordination items for this development include: CR 116 trunk easement is shown as required. o Due to timing of filing the final plat for recording of the easement, the Developer is responsible to obtain a Right of Entry to construct the system prior to final plat being recorded. Any system “up size” for trunk is credited from TLAC fees. Looping of internal dead ends is required at City direction. Trunk water extended to west, Stubs to neighboring parcels are required, Hackamore 8-inch connecting to Steeple Chase will loop the Hackamore connection point (Phase 2). This is a developer cost. Connection may be required to Medina at Medina Lake Road. This is a City cost. 4.2 IDENTIFIED ISSUES Landscape plan appears to be in conflict with CR 116 trunk watermain. The amount and type of landscaping (if any) in an easement is TBD since it interferes with future access. Hackamore water main connection to Steeple Chase (Ravinia) will require easements along Hackamore. Road and trail improvement planning is in progress with Medina. Several cul de sacs and dead ends will be required to be looped. The locations and number of loops are TBD. Townhome service points, metering, etc. is TBD. Hydrants are to be located opposite sidewalks and stubs typically have hydrant/blowoff as directed by City. May 2020 5-1 \\wenck.local\wenckspace\Vol1\2294-Corcoran\20-500 Tavera Lennar\Draft Engineer Report for Preliminary Plat.docx 5.0 Water Resources 5.1 GENERAL In this section, the review of stormwater modeling and engineering plans is discussed in accordance with City Guidelines and also refers to the Elm Creek Watershed requirements. Modeling schematics and subwatersheds are shown in Appendix C. Stormwater Modeling A SWMM model shall be used to analyze existing and proposed conditions due to the complicated interconnection of the system, equalization flow between the numerous ponds and wetlands, and discharging to a FEMA mapped floodplain FEMA process will be followed for modifying the floodplain within the property boundaries. Basically, this involves a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process and final documentation after all structures are built. o LOMR-F (Fill) can be executed prior to FEMA LOMR verification of floodplain so the individual houses are not affected, however this is based on a robust and detailed model to set the 100-year floodplain. This is the same process as used in Ravinia. 5.2 DRAINAGE PATTERNS Stormwater from the proposed development drains to the north towards Blue Bonnet (220 acres), east across CR 116 (57 acres), and also a southeast portion that drains beneath CR 116 (315 acres). The southeast subwatershed receives drainage from east of CR 116 near Hackamore, and from Medina south of Hackamore. Subwatershed maps are in Appendix A. 5.3 IDENTIFIED ISSUES Additional detail of existing rural culverts, field crossings, etc. are required. Verify rate control and drainage patterns are maintained. Identify change in wetland bounce due to flood storage Backyard low areas shall be explicitly modeled for inundated areas on CBs. Rear yard grading on the west boundary will be further reviewed All overflows and cross-connects need to be modeled as exist in the field. Several junctions are modeled where wetland EOFs may drain to a separate storm sewer system and end up in ponds, rather than the intended/modeled downstream pond/wetland. Secondary pipes are utilized as EOFs 5.4 GUIDANCE Some general City guidance for plan revisions (in addition to the Stormwater Guidelines) include: Toll Free: 800-472-2232 Email: wenckmp@wenck.com Web: wenck.com MINNESOTA COLORADO GEORGIA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA WYOMING Maple Plain Golden Valley New Hope Denver Roswell Fargo Pierre Cheyenne 763-479-4200 763-252-6800 800-368-8831 602-370-7420 678-987-5840 701-297-9600 605-222-1826 307-634-7848 Windom Woodbury Fort Collins Mandan Sheridan 507-831-2703 651-294-4580 970-223-4705 701-751-3370 307-675-1148 Williston 800-472-2232 Water Quality BMPs Water quality requirements are reviewed and approved by WMO, however if applicable the City prefers a pond “shelf” filtration as compared to stand-alone filtration basins. Offsite Project Large developments in Corcoran contribute for funding of a larger water resource project, typically off site. This development drains to same wetland as Ravinia and combined Tavera funds can be utilized to increase project scope, or alternatively a project to the northwest watershed. In lieu of stormwater fees, Corcoran has committed to implement water resource projects with development for progress towards regulatory compliance such as TMDLs. Tavera is similar scope as Ravinia and contribution of $100,000 will be combined with Ravinia contribution. Specific project(s) will be decided as the development builds out. EOFs Provide at least one foot of freeboard from high water levels to EOF. Structure low openings will be 2 feet above the EOF and 2 feet above HWL. Overland EOFs shown on plans generally appear to function as intended. Several wetlands/ponds have the EOF identified as a secondary pipe. These require additional modeling that includes pipe failure (no flow) from the main outlet which creates a secondary HWL. EOFs for CR 116 EOFs need review, it appears south of the main entrance the wetland does not have an EOF and secondary structure under CR 116 may be required. Complete analysis of all EOFs will be completed. Model Inputs and Flood Storage CN for pervious areas shall be raised from existing conditions. Several wetlands are being modified to provide retention. Review comments and compliance with WCA are TBD. Side Yard Slopes, Depth and Easements Maximum pipe flow velocity is 10 ft/sec per Ten States Standards. Some of the steeper pipe velocities currently calculate above 20 ft/sec. Due to deep pipes, some easement widths will need to be revised to accommodate replacement and maintenance. o Easement “half” width shall be measured as 1:1 slopes from pipe invert to easement line at ground level (a 10 foot deep pipe requires a total 20 foot wide easement) o This is challenging for design with narrow side yards and deep stormsewer. o This may affect lot count or lot layout. Rear Yard Catch Basins Inundation areas need to be calculated for rear yard catch basins to ensure HWLs stay within a drainage easement. Concrete structures are required. Toll Free: 800-472-2232 Email: wenckmp@wenck.com Web: wenck.com MINNESOTA COLORADO GEORGIA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA WYOMING Maple Plain Golden Valley New Hope Denver Roswell Fargo Pierre Cheyenne 763-479-4200 763-252-6800 800-368-8831 602-370-7420 678-987-5840 701-297-9600 605-222-1826 307-634-7848 Windom Woodbury Fort Collins Mandan Sheridan 507-831-2703 651-294-4580 970-223-4705 701-751-3370 307-675-1148 Williston 800-472-2232 Adjacent Properties Grading at property boundaries will need to be managed. Both “run on” and “run off” are of concern for the perimeter. Point source discharges will need energy dissipation Diversions of areas will be reviewed Stub streets shall capture the street runoff and manage the stormwater within the development. Appendix A Feasibility Study Appendix B Engineering Plan Markups by Area c67OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH4-21-20PJC/BNMMPC/MSNNameReg. No.DateRevisions1.DateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS4-21-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT2.01 Area 1 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE 3.01PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 4.01PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 5.01PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION Area 2 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE 3.02PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 4.02PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 5.02PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION Area 3 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE 3.03PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 4.03PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 5.03PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION Area 4 © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution Airbus DS © 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS © 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS HORSESHOE TRAILHACKAMORE ROAD © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution Airbus DS © 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS © 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS HORSESHOE TRAILHACKAMORE ROAD I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE 3.04PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN Area 5 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 4.04PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 5.04PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION Area 6 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE 3.05PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 4.05PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 5.05PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION Area 7 NES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS HACKAMORE ROAD Appendix C Floodplain, Drainage Areas, Initial Review and Model Schematics SINGLE STORY 70,000 SF 1,500 SEATS WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA 340 CARS 200 CARS310 CARS GOLDENROD TRAFFIC OR EMERGENCY ACCESS MAY BE REQUIRED RAVINIA 11TH TURNAROUD, STORMWATER EOF AND UTILITY COORDINATION WITH LENNAR IS NECESSARY. SEWER INVERT 979.25 AT LARKSPUR IS FEASIBLE FOR AT GRADE CONSTRUCTION. CONNECT TO 8'' WATERMAIN IN LARKSPUR SEWER INVERT IN LUPINE 994.3, NOT FEASIBLE FOR CHURCH SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION. SEWER INVERT IN GOLDENROD 970.5, IS FEASIBLE FOR CONNECTION. 8'' WATER FROM GOLDENROD MAY LOOP TO LUPINE 8'' WATER FROM LUPINE PROPOSED STREET ALIGNMENT LOOP WATER THROUGH SITE FROM LUPINE TO LARKSPUR EXISTING POND WEIR STRUCTURE NEEDS TO BE STUDIED AND FIX COORDINATED WITH LENNAR STORMWATER GOES SOUTH INTO MEDINA THEN NORTH UNDER HACKAMORE AND EAST UNDER CR 101 EOF DIVERSION PIPE TO EAST MAY BE REQUIRED ENTRYEXIT PLANNED TRAIL ON NORTH SIDE OF HACKAMORE HACKAMORE , TRAIL AND CR 101 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNDER STUDY WITH MEDINA PLANNED COUNTY TRAIL ON WEST SIDE OF CR 101 MODIFY EASTERN STREET STUB TO PERMANENT SOLUTION AND WATER LOOPING VACATE EXISTING PRIVATE DRIVEWAY EASEMENT PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THIS AREA NORTH OF LOOP ROAD COUNTY DETERMINES CR 101 ACCESS 456710112''8'' 8''8''8''8''63rdPlace North SteepleChaseLaneCounty Road47 Bri dl e P a t h LupineLane LarkspurLaneGolde nr od T r a il Larkspur Co u rtCounty Road 101Brockton Lane NorthBergamotDrive Hackamore Road8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8'' 8'' Path: L:\2294\0054\Pro\EagleBrook\EagleBrook.aprx 5/1/2020 4:25 PM ShuJC0243 Layout: Site Plan and Infrastructure Impacts Figure 1 MAY 2020 Site Plan and Infrastructure Impacts CITY OF CORCORAN ¯250 0 250125 Feet 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AREA Technical Memo Wenck | Colorado | Georgia | Minnesota | North Dakota | Wyoming Toll Free 800-472-2232 Web wenck.com To: Kent Torve, P.E., City Engineer From: Dan Elemes, P.E. Date: May 20, 2020 Subject: HydroCAD Model Review – Tavera by Lennar This review was conducted with the Preliminary Plat review and further reviews will be conducted on revised models and plans. 1.0 Stormwater Model Revisions General 1.1 Submit stormwater model free of warnings and errors. It is required that XP- SWMM (or equivalent) software be used to model existing and proposed conditions, due to the significant amount of equalization and/or back flow, the presence of floodplain and current number of warnings in submitted model. 1.2 FEMA floodplain will be established through this project. 1.3 Model proposed conditions assuming all Type D soils for pervious areas due to anticipated compaction from mass grading. 1.3.1 Proposed pervious soil CN shall be higher than existing pervious CN 1.4 Existing and proposed wetlands, filtration basins and ponds shall be modeled with a curve number of 98. 1.5 Model all ponds and wetlands with initial water surface elevations equal to the lowest non-(in)filtration outlet elevation. 1.6 Update model as necessary to address Plan revision comments listed below. This may require additional pond nodes and rerouting different outlets to different receiving water bodies. 1.7 Include road sags and low areas in backyards in stormwater model to evaluate HWLs. This will require further delineation of watersheds and modeling additional storage areas. Reevaluate EOF and LO elevations based on model results. 1.8 Document how outlet boundary conditions (tailwater elevation) are determined. 1.9 Emergency EOFs at CR 116 shall be reviewed and additional structures may be required. 1.10 Rural culverts and offsite drainage to have further detail. Specific 1.11 Include secondary outflow from Pond WT. Pond WT will overflow to the west at an approximate elevation of 977. Current modeled HWL is 977.4. 2 https://wenck-my.sharepoint.com/personal/ricis1133_wenck_com/Documents/Desktop/Stormwater Model Review_Friday.docx 1.12 Review culvert sizing. As water flows from pond W4 to WTse to WTsw to WT to Channel to WC, culvert crossings are 18”, 12”, 42”, 18” and 21”, respectively. 1.13 Provide supplemental 100-year modeling for all ponds and wetlands where culverts are identified as the basin’s EOF. Supplemental models shall assume “normal” outlet is blocked (where normal outlet is different than identified EOF pipe), and basin initial water surface elevation is equal to the outlet elevation of the EOF. 1.14 Include the culvert crossing shown below in existing and proposed models. Subdivide Wetland L watersheds and storage curves as necessary. 2.0 Plan Revisions General 2.1 Identify location, dimensions and elevation of EOFs on the grading plan. 2.2 OCS in wetlands to be reviewed. 2.3 WCA process should provide analysis of how wetland quality will be maintained if used for additional depth of flood storage. Analysis should ponding durations. Specific 2.4 Wetland C shall discharge to Wetland B, not to Pond 650P. 2.5 Provide additional detail for western edge of Pond 900P grading. Top of berm appears to be 978.0 which is the same elevation as the specified EOF. 3 https://wenck-my.sharepoint.com/personal/ricis1133_wenck_com/Documents/Desktop/Stormwater Model Review_Friday.docx 2.6 Specify EOF elevation for the low area in the backyards of Lots 320 through 335. EOF appears to be between Lots 330 and 331. Adjust grading plan as necessary to provide adequate freeboard between EOF and LO. 2.7 Provide lower overland EOF for Wetland complexes N, O, P, Q and R. If the culverts plug, the overland EOF for these wetlands is overtop Street A at an elevation of approximately 985.5 which is within 0.2’ of LOs of some adjacent lots. 2.8 Provide EOF for Wetland J. If proposed culvert plugs Wetland J will not overtop until numerous houses are flooded. 2.9 Provide EOF for Wetland K. If proposed culvert plugs Wetland K will not overtop until numerous houses are flooded. 2.10 Currently modeled HWL for Pond 800P may encroach onto Lots 365 and 363. 2.11 Floodplain mitigation figure identifies Ponds 600P, 650P and 700P as providing compensatory storage. However, permanent pool volume is not considered live storage. Verify and resubmit calculations demonstrating sufficient compensatory storage is provided between pond NWLs (established based on lowest, non (in)filtration-based outlet) and base flood elevation. 2.12 Floodplain mitigation figure identifies Pond 800P as providing compensatory storage. However, Pond 800P’s normal water level (973.6) is greater than the adjacent base flood elevation (973.3). Therefore, storage provided in Pond 800P is not acceptable as compensatory storage. LarkLarkin Rd Kalk RdCatesLonghornRdHorseshoe TrOld Settlers RdOld Settlers Rd70th Ave NBluArrowhead BluestemRdN Summerhill LnSummerhill LnBluestemRdNMohawk DrLost Horse RdKatrinka RdMEDINACORCORAPRELIMINAEXISTING LEGEND SHCOVER SHSHEET INDE0.010.021.01-1.023.01-3.05CORCORAN, MINNESOTAPRELIMINAPRELIMINA4.01-4.055.01-5.057.01-7.05GRADING 8.01-8.05PRELIMINA6.01-6.24PRELIMINAPRELIMINA2.01-2.06WETLAND9.01-9.02WETLAND9.11-9.15PRELIMINA10.01POND LEGENDPOND 900PPOND 800PPOND 700PPOND 600PPOND 650PPOND 300PPOND 180PPOND 150PPOND 100PPOND 400P I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 1OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 04-21-2020 PJC/BNM BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS XXXXX XX-XX-2019 First M. Last PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-HYDR-EXST 1EXISTING HYDROLOGY LEGENDFIGURE 01EXISTING PRIMARYWATERSHEDS EAST WATERSHED 57.8-AC 2.1% IMP. NORTH WATERSHED 219.3-AC 3.0% IMP. WATERSHED 4 WILL OVERFLOW TO SOUTH DURING 100-YR EVENT. 42.7-CFS ROUTED NORTH. 0.9-CFS ROUTED SOUTH. SOUTHEAST WATERSHED 316.1-AC 21.8% IMP. WETLAND I OVERFLOWS INTO WETLAND L FOR 100-YR EVENT. 3.1-CFS ROUTED TO EAST. 1.9-CFS ROUTED TO SOUTHEAST SPECIFIC MODEL OUTPUT VALUES NOTED HEREIN, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO HIGH WATER LEVELS, FLOW RATES AND LOW OPENINGS, MAY CHANGE WITH UPDATED MODELING. NUMBERS AND COMMENTS PROVIDED FOR GENERAL DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 1OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 04-21-2020 PJC/BNM BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS XXXXX XX-XX-2019 First M. Last PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-HYDR-PROP 1PROPOSED HYDROLOGY LEGENDFIGURE 02PROPOSED PRIMARYWATERSHEDS SPECIFIC MODEL OUTPUT VALUES NOTED HEREIN, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO HIGH WATER LEVELS, FLOW RATES AND LOW OPENINGS, MAY CHANGE WITH UPDATED MODELING. NUMBERS AND COMMENTS PROVIDED FOR GENERAL DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. NORTH WATERSHED 221.2-AC 20.6% IMP SOUTHEAST WATERSHED 315.0-AC 29.7% IMP EAST WATERSHED 57.0-AC 26.0% IMP WATERSHED 4 OVERFLOWS TO THE SOUTH FOR THE 100-YR EVENT. 42.2-CFS ROUTED NORTH. 0.9-CFS ROUTED SOUTH. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 1OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 04-21-2020 PJC/BNM BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS XXXXX XX-XX-2019 First M. Last PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-HYDR-PROP 1PROPOSED HYDROLOGY LEGENDEOF SUMMARYENTIRE SITE Toll Free: 800-472-2232 Email: wenckmp@wenck.com Web: wenck.com WENCK File #2294-0043 October 2019 - Revised November 21, 2019 Prepared by: WENCK Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Corcoran, MN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Lennar – Wessel Property Development Infrastructure Feasibility Study – Concept 2 November 21, 2019 i T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 SEWER ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Option A Alignment ............................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Findings ............................................................................................. 2-2 3.0 WATER ........................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Scenario 1: Water System Without Water Main Loops .............................. 3-2 3.2 Scenario 2: Water System with Water Main Loops ................................... 3-3 3.3 Scenario 3: Water System with Water Main Loops and Tower/Booster ....... 3-3 3.4 Findings ............................................................................................. 3-4 4.0 WATER RESOURCES .................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Regulatory Overview ........................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Watershed Setting and Land Use ........................................................... 4-1 4.3 Stormwater Management ..................................................................... 4-2 4.4 Findings ............................................................................................. 4-2 5.0 TRANSPORTATION ...................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Background ........................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Proposed Development Characteristics ................................................... 5-1 5.3 Future Development Assumptions ......................................................... 5-1 5.4 Existing Conditions .............................................................................. 5-1 5.5 Traffic Forecasts .................................................................................. 5-2 5.6 Traffic Analysis ................................................................................... 5-5 5.7 Findings ............................................................................................. 5-9 6.0 FINANCING ................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1 Summary ........................................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................... 7-1 November 21, 2019 ii T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx Table of Contents (Cont.) IN-TEXT TABLES Table 5-1. Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project ............................................ 5-3 Table 5-2. Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................... 5-3 Table 5-3. Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .................................................... 5-4 Table 5-4. Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results ........................................ 5-6 Table 5-5. Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results ........................................ 5-7 Table 5-6. 95th Percentile Vehicle Queue Lengths at CR 116/Hackamore Road................ 5-8 Table 5-7. 95th Percentile Vehicle Queue Lengths at CR 116/Hackamore Road................ 5-8 TABLES 1 Cost Estimate for Sewer Option 2 Water Distribution System Modeling Results FIGURES 1 Sewer Option A 2 Water Model Pipe Network 3 Average Day Pressure (without Loops) 4 Peak Hour (without Loops) 5 Available Fire Flow (without Loops) 6 Average Day Pressure (with Loops and Future Tower/Booster) 7 Peak Hour Pressure (with Loops and Future Tower/Booster) 8 Available Fire Flow (with Loops and Future Tower/Booster) APPENDICES A Preliminary Phasing Plan for Development B Stormwater Modeling Guidelines November 21, 2019 1-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx 1.0 Introduction Lennar previously requested a feasibility study for estimated costs for utilities and recommendations for transportation improvements to serve a proposed development (hereinafter referred to as “Concept 1”), which was generally located in the northwest quadrant of the County Road 116 and Hackamore Road intersection and referred to as the Wessel property development. The requested feasibility study was completed in March 2019. Lennar has now requested an updated feasibility study that includes an additional parcel (Dempsey) located northwest of the Concept 1 development area, thus creating a larger development project (hereinafter referred to as “Concept 2”). The entrance to this development is proposed to be at 66th Avenue North and County Road 116. This report looks specifically at the feasibility of providing sewer and water service to the proposed Concept 2 development, stormwater needs and impacts, and transportation needs for ultimate buildout. Multiple options for sanitary sewer service by the City of Corcoran were evaluated in the Concept 1 feasibility study, and as a result, only one sewer option required detailed evaluation in this feasibility study. This sewer option is discussed with respect to the projected inverts that would be achieved and the estimated costs. Water service is relatively straightforward, and development of multiple options was unnecessary. Financing options of the development necessary for infrastructure and to mitigate impacts typically follow the approach of: • On-site infrastructure is managed by the developer • Upsizing of on-site trunk utilities are provided credit, with eligibility determined during the approval process • Trunk sewer and water fees (TLAC) are being updated in 2019 • Off-site projects are managed by the City (engineering, bidding and construction management) and financed through an escrow The financial package will be further detailed and negotiated as the project moves forward and culminates in the overall Developer Agreement with the overall preliminary plat approval which is updated for each phase of the development. This draft report should be viewed as a working document based upon the latest information provided to the City. The report will be reviewed and finalized based on the applicant’s submittal. November 21, 2019 2-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx 2.0 Sewer In the Concept 1 feasibility study, three primary alignment options (1, 2 and 3) were evaluated for potential service to the Wessel property development, though an Option 4 was developed for discussion of potential service to the large parcel adjacent to the northwest portion of Wessel, since it was recognized that the addition of this parcel could affect how the sewers within Wessel would be constructed. Since Lennar has now added this parcel to the proposed (Concept 2) development, the prior Option 4 is viewed as the only technically viable option for providing service to the entire development area. However, since the prior feasibility study determined that, among Options 1 to 3, Option 3 was the most cost effective option to serve Wessel (with sewer entering the development from 66th Avenue North), the only option presented in this feasibility study is essentially a hybrid of prior Options 3 and 4, i.e., sewer will enter the development from 66th Avenue North and a temporary lift station will be required in order to provide service to the northwest portion of the Concept 2 development. This option is hereinafter referred to as “Option A” and is shown on Figure 1. The estimated cost for Option A is shown in Table 1. This cost estimate includes contingency (10%), engineering/legal (15%), and easements, and generally only reflects costs outside the Wessel boundary (except where specifically stated otherwise). 2.1 OPTION A ALIGNMENT The downstream sewer connection is to the 12-inch trunk sewer that is being extended westward through the current Lennar – Ravinia development. Routing of the sewer flows from Wessel to this sewer is generally in accordance with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The starting point for invert and cost analysis was at the property line just northeast of the north end of Park Trail Drive, as noted on Figure 1. This alignment extends the 12-inch sewer to just north of 66th Avenue North, where it turns westward towards Wessel across a wetland, and then enters Wessel in the central part near the primary entrance. Note that a stub is required to be extended southward in the offsite routing (just across 66th Avenue North) to avoid future disturbance of this street. Then, a 10-inch sewer is extended to the southwest corner of Wessel. The projected invert at the southwest corner is 973.9, which appears to be serviceable. This 10-inch is intended to provide extra capacity that would be available for potential development of additional parcels located further west thereof. Topographically a ridge of higher elevations is present in the central and northeastern portions of the Concept 1 development, which then drops significantly going westward into the added parcel (for Concept 2), and hence the only way to provide sewer service to the added parcel area is via a temporary lift station. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan indicates that service to this other parcel would be provided by the substantially lower invert that will be achieved when sewer is eventually extended southward from the downtown area. However, the timing for completing construction of permanent trunk sewer from the downtown area southward will be much later than this proposed Concept 2 development. The required temporary lift station will need to be constructed in the northwest corner of the development (Figure 1), with a force main extended eastward to discharge into the eastward-flowing gravity sewer near the development entrance (across CR 116 from 66th Avenue North). Ultimately, when the gravity sewer is finally constructed all the way to temporary lift station area from the downtown area, the lift station would be removed and wastewater reaching this location would then flow by gravity to the downtown area. November 21, 2019 2-2 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx With addition of the temporary lift station, it is now possible to construct gravity sewers in the northern and west-central portion of the development to flow to the lift station. The MCES lift station at County Road 10 (where the eastward-flowing gravity sewer eventually flows) was not provided with as much capacity as needed for the portion of SE Corcoran that is currently planned to flow there. MCES has provided approximately 0.6 MGD (average day) capacity, versus a needed flow that is approximately double that. For this reason, diversion of some of the Wessel area wastewater would aid this situation, since wastewater that reaches the downtown area will eventually be diverted into Northeast Corcoran, where much larger capacity was provided by MCES. It should be noted that the phasing plan that has been provided to the City (Appendix A) will need to be coordinated with sewer shed outlined in this Feasibility Study. As currently shown, the phasing plan could potentially result in multiple modifications to the temporary lift station and force main as the development builds out, and such costs are not estimated herein. The cost of this option is estimated to be approximately $1,450,000 (Table 1). Again, this cost estimate includes contingency (10%), engineering/legal (15%), and easements, and generally only reflects costs outside the Wessel boundary (except where specifically stated otherwise). For reference, if the temporary lift station and force main are not included in this estimate, the cost estimate would drop to approximately $770,000. 2.2 FINDINGS The following key findings and recommendations are made: • Option A is recommended, with an estimated cost of approximately $1,450,000 (or $770,000 without including the temporary lift station and force main). This recommendation is made based on analysis presented in the prior feasibility study (Concept 1), as summarized above, and also based on the simple fact that the only technically feasible option for providing sewer service to the added northwestern parcel in the Concept 2 development is to construct the temporary lift station, as described in Option A. • Routing of the offsite 12-inch sewer is conceptual at this point, and minor modifications with respect to routing in/near 66th Avenue North and Park Trail Drive will need to be finalized by the City. However, significant changes to the inverts shown for Option A are not expected. • Routing of the sewer flows from Wessel eastward to the 12-inch sewer that is being extended westward through Ravinia is generally in accordance with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. • The phasing plan will need to be coordinated with sewer shed outlined in this Feasibility Study since it could potentially result in multiple modifications to the temporary lift station and force main (such costs are not estimated herein). November 21, 2019 3-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx 3.0 Water The water supply for the Wessel property development will be the same as planned for all of SE Corcoran. Under a contract to provide water service, Maple Grove will continue to supply SE Corcoran with up to a maximum day demand (MDD) of 5 million gallons per day (MGD). Evaluation of multiple options for water service was unnecessary. In 2020, the City is constructing a Western Water Loop, which is the 12-inch water main segment extending southward from the downtown area and turning eastward at 66th Avenue North to eventually connect to the 12-inch water main that is being extended westward through Lennar – Ravinia (Figure 2). Primary water service into the Wessel development will be directly from this loop, with connection near the primary street entrance into Wessel (node J-C10 on Figure 2). The 12-inch water main will eventually be extended westward through the central portion of Wessel (including an isolated offsite portion, generally located between J-W7 and J-W10). 8-inch water mains will be constructed throughout the rest of the development. The need and timing for the offsite portion of the 12-inch water main (water main “looping”) is evaluated herein. For modeling purposes, only certain potential street locations (8-inch water main locations) were utilized to reach the north and south ends of the development, i.e., not all potential anticipated (street-based) 8-inch water mains were put into the model. However, this will only serve to provide more conservative results in this FS, since the addition of a few more 8-inch water mains will act to improve water system performance (fire flows in particular). Looping of an 8-inch water main along Hackamore Road is also evaluated herein. The routing of this 8-inch water main loop could be as depicted on Figure 2, if development of the property in the northeast quadrant of the CR 116 and Hackamore Road intersection occurs in the very near future. If that development does not occur coincident with the southern construction phasing in Wessel, then Wessel will need to construct this water main loop, likely following Hackamore Road all the way to an 8-inch water main located in Wessel’s Hackamore Road entrance. Water system performance would be very similar with either configuration of the 8-inch Hackamore Road water main loop. At some dead-end water main locations (e.g., J-W4 and J-W9), Wessel will need to ensure that water main stubs are constructed to the property line, such that future development to the west and north of Wessel will eventually create additional water main looping. These future loops serve to improve fire flow and water quality within the Wessel development. Finally, at the road entrance into Wessel from Hackamore Road, the City may require construction of an interconnect across Hackamore Road to the City of Medina’s water system, depending on Medina’s mutual interest. Though multiple service options were not evaluated, three stages of development were considered in order to evaluate the progression of water system performance. First, an analysis of the Wessel development without the 12-inch west-central water main loop (between J-W7 and J-W10) and also without the 8-inch water main loop along Hackamore Road (see Figure 2). Then, a “with loops” scenario was evaluated to reflect completion of these two loops. Finally, water system performance was evaluated at a point soon after the future water tower and booster station are constructed. Per the May 4, 2017 Wenck Technical Memo summarizing the most recent SE Corcoran water supply modeling, the water tower would be constructed near the point at which maximum day demand (MDD) reaches 1,225 gpm (1.75 MGD), or approximately 1,550 households (using a conservative November 21, 2019 3-2 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx MDD of 0.79 gpm per household). The water tower was assumed to be constructed somewhere just east of the downtown area, and the booster station would be constructed concurrently with the tower, at a location just inside Corcoran at the Maple Grove feed point (i.e., near node J-C2 as shown on Figure 2). The water demands placed on the pipe network total approximately 1,550 gpm (MDD). This is slightly above the demand at which the tower is estimated to be needed, as noted above. For the residential water demand, an average day demand (ADD) of 350 gallons per day (gpd) per household was utilized, which translates to approximately 0.24 gpm per household. The ratio of MDD to ADD is referred to as the “peaking factor”. Using a peaking factor of 3.25, the MDD is 1,138 gpd per household, or 0.79 gpm per household. The 350 gpd per household does include an allowance for contribution of water demand from commercial/industrial sources. Hydraulic analysis of the SE Corcoran water system was conducted using the computer modeling software WaterCAD, which simulates the water system’s response to average and peak demands and firefighting scenarios. Each condition creates different responses in the water system. The modeling results help to identify and evaluate the various options for future water system infrastructure in the SE Corcoran, including pipe and water tower sizing and the estimated timing of water tower construction. For residential areas, a target fire flow of 1,500 gpm (2-hour duration) will be used. For commercial/ industrial areas, a higher target fire flow of 3,000 gpm (3-hour duration) will be used. New commercial/ industrial buildings will be sprinklered and, as such, most of these buildings will ultimately have a lower acceptable target. However, 3,000 gpm is deemed a reasonable overall target, and allows for some conservatism in this safety-driven parameter. A map of the pipe network that was used for this modeling work is shown on Figure 2. The west-central 12-inch water main loop and the Hackamore Road 8-inch water main loop that is shown on this figure was shut off for Scenario 1 but turned on for Scenarios 2 and 3. The water tower shown on this figure was shut off for Scenarios 1 and 2 but turned on in Scenario 3. Although the booster station is built into the model and was shut off in Scenarios 1 and 2, it was also shut off in Scenario 3 to provide the most conservative results (i.e., it represents times when the water system is only operating off the water tower and the booster is in an “off” cycle). 3.1 SCENARIO 1: WATER SYSTEM WITHOUT WATER MAIN LOOPS The modeling results for this scenario are shown on Figures 3, 4, and 5, and in Table 2. Under ADD conditions, pressures at all nodes were above the recommended minimum pressure of 35 psi, and most locations were in the 40 to 60 psi range. Under MDD conditions, which are a relatively rare occurrence, only the two highest-elevation locations (both in Ravinia) fell slightly below the 35 psi minimum, as highlighted in Table 2. All Wessel locations were in the 35 to 45 psi range, approximately. In the peak hour (of the MDD), these same two highest-elevation locations fall to near 25 psi, and some of the other relatively high elevations drop into the 29 to 35 psi range. Given the rare and short duration-nature of this condition and given the relatively conservative household demand that is being used, these transient pressures are considered acceptable. However, these results do confirm the previously-referenced, prior modeling work, which concluded a future water tower/booster station should be added at the point in the future when the 1,225 gpm MDD is reached. This represents a point in time that is slightly earlier than the point in time that is reflected in the scenarios evaluated herein. November 21, 2019 3-3 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx The available fire flow, which is evaluated under MDD conditions, shows a few locations in Ravinia that are somewhat short of the 1,500 gpm target, and most locations in the downtown area are somewhat short of the 3,000 gpm target, matching what was observed in prior modeling work. In Wessel, the non-looped 8-inch water mains generally show fire flows below the 1,500 gpm target, reaching as low as approximately 750 gpm at nodes J- W3 and J-W7, which are the most-distant locations in the two dead-end water main segments. Given that both of these locations are only providing half the recommended fire flow, construction of both water main loops concurrent with Wessel’s water system installation would be prudent (see next section for discussion of water main looping results). 3.2 SCENARIO 2: WATER SYSTEM WITH WATER MAIN LOOPS Results for this scenario are shown in Table 2 (no figures are presented). This scenario was prepared to evaluate the effects of adding the west-central 12-inch water main loop and a complete 8-inch water main loop along Hackamore Road, while other conditions remain unchanged (i.e., with the same water demands applied, and both without the water tower/booster station online). The pressures in Scenario 2 were not significantly changed by the addition of this loop, as expected (pressures are largely dominated by ground elevations). However, fire flows were significantly improved in Wessel. The approximately 750 gpm fire flows noted above (nodes J-W3 and J-W7) improved significantly to approximately 1,400 and 1,750 gpm, respectively, which are right around the 1,500 gpm target. Similar improvement was evident in several other nodes. The results for this scenario clearly show the improvements in fire flow that will be achieved by adding the west-central 12-inch water main loop and the Hackamore Road 8-inch water main loop. Water quality will also be improved by this looping, since long dead-end water mains can sometimes have water quality problems due to potential slow-moving or stagnant water (possibly causing low chlorine residual and/or bacterial film formation in pipes). 3.3 SCENARIO 3: WATER SYSTEM WITH WATER MAIN LOOPS AND TOWER/BOOSTER The final scenario evaluates the potential improvements due to the future addition of a water tower and booster station at the locations discussed previously, which are shown on Figures 2, 6, 7, and 8. Modeling results for this scenario are shown on Figures 6, 7, and 8, and in Table 2. Under ADD conditions, pressures at all nodes are all well above the recommended minimum pressure of 35 psi, and most locations are in the 65 to 85 psi range (typically providing about a 25 psi pressure boost from Scenarios 1 and 2). Under MDD conditions, pressures are typically only about 2 psi less than those in ADD, still well above minimum pressure. In the peak hour (of the MDD), the pressures would typically drop another 4 to 7 psi; however, the minimum predicted pressures are still above 50 psi, approximately 15 psi above the minimum pressure. Available fire flows at all locations are improved to above-target levels. These results indicate that adding the currently planned 1 MG tower with a hydraulic grade line (HGL) of 1,156 feet (with the accompanying booster station) will provide acceptable results for all pressure and fire flow scenarios that were evaluated. November 21, 2019 3-4 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx 3.4 FINDINGS The following key findings and recommendations are made: • Looping of the development is required, such as the street connection on Horseshoe Trail, which is required to be looped with either the west-central 12-inch water main loop or Old Settlers. • Looping the development back to Ravinia along Hackamore Road with an 8-inch water main is required. • Provide easement along CR 116 for the trunk water connection from 66th Avenue North to the development boundary for the trunk line that will connect at 75th Avenue North (City funded construction project). • At some dead-end water main locations (e.g., J-W4 and J-W9), Wessel will need to ensure that water main stubs are constructed to the property line, such that future development to the west and north of Wessel will eventually allow for additional water main looping. These future loops serve to improve fire flow and water quality within the Wessel development. • At the road entrance to Wessel from Hackamore Road, the City may require construction of an interconnect across Hackamore Road to the City of Medina’s water system, depending on Medina’s mutual interest. November 21, 2019 4-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx 4.0 Water Resources In this chapter, the stormwater implications of this proposed development are reviewed in light of local and state regulations, watershed features, and potential changes in land use that would occur if development proceeds. 4.1 REGULATORY OVERVIEW Stormwater management regulations in the proposed project area would be guided or directed by Corcoran’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (Local Plan) and the City’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Each of these documents has a larger regulatory context: • The Local Plan reflects the goals, policies and rules of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission’s Third Generation Watershed Management Plan (Commission’s WMP). • The SWPPP is a requirement of the City’s stormwater permit, formally known as the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. The MS4 permit is issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). • Among other goals, both documents include plans to meet pollutant load reductions calculated in the Elm Creek Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study. TMDL studies are required for surface waters that are designated as impaired – in other words, those that do not meet one or more state water quality standards. 4.2 WATERSHED SETTING AND LAND USE The proposed development is situated in the Maple Creek drainage area, which discharges to Maple Grove south of Lions Park and the west end (included in Concept 2) drains northward towards the City park complex and joins the South Fork of Rush Creek north of County Road 10. For the easterly drainage, a previous study (Maple Creek Drainage Study, 2002) identified 850 acres within Corcoran discharging to Maple Grove. The vicinity of the project is drained by a ditch (County Ditch #16—Maple Creek), towards the northeast into a large wetland east of CR 116 and north of the Ravinia development. Maple Creek, in turn, drains to Elm Creek, which is impaired for aquatic life and recreation by excess E. coli bacteria and low dissolved oxygen. Improved stormwater management in the Maple Creek drainage area will benefit the Elm Creek system and downstream waters. Land use and cover in the proposed development is a mix of natural and agricultural with minor residential (farm homestead) use and several wetlands. This pattern is typical of Corcoran, which is still a predominantly agricultural community with scattered low-density residential development and an abundance of wetlands. Development is increasing in the City, however, and the change from agricultural to non-agricultural land use presents opportunities to better manage stormwater runoff. This is true of the proposed development site, where land use will change from row crops and farm homestead to suburban residential. Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) installed during construction will improve water quality not only in Maple Creek and the wetlands on site but also in the large wetland complex northeast of the proposed development. Improvement of this wetland complex, including a public waters wetland (DNR #27-0437), is one of the goals of Corcoran’s Local Plan. November 21, 2019 4-2 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx 4.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Lennar proposes a development on the Wessel and Dempsey parcel which changes the land cover from agricultural/wooded/wetlands to suburban residential. Agricultural use of the land would cease, replaced by both pervious lawns/open space and impervious surfaces that will change the landscape and impact stormwater runoff. Although cessation of agriculture generally benefits water quality by reducing export of nutrients and sediment, construction of additional impervious surfaces, such as the roads, driveways and sidewalks in this residential development, increases the rate, volume, and pollutant load to nearby surface waters. Turn lane improvements to CR 116 would also slightly increase impervious surface area and, like neighborhood roads and driveways, would require practices to mitigate the impact of impervious stormwater runoff. Mitigation is accomplished by aligning development plans with stormwater regulations. Corcoran’s Local Plan, in agreement with the Commission’s WMP, requires that certain development plans be submitted to the City and the Commission for review. The purpose of the review is to ensure that the developer’s plans for stormwater management during and after construction meet the Commission’s rules regarding the rate, volume and pollutant load of stormwater runoff, along with other rules regarding wetland alteration, erosion and sediment control and other aspects of surface water protection. This adherence to Commission rules is one of the strategies Corcoran has chosen to also meet its TMDL obligations. The implementation plan calls on Corcoran to apply these standards when land use changes, a strategy that is expected to have the net result of improving the quality of stormwater runoff. Stormwater modeling guidelines are in Appendix B, and as noted FEMA floodplain modifications and offsite water quality improvements are listed. In addition to improved stormwater management, restoration or improvement of the wetlands in the development can also benefit water quality. The details of the restoration and its benefits will be determined as the project moves forward. Complementing the Local Plan, Corcoran’s SWPPP requires plan review, construction site erosion and sediment control, and post-construction stormwater management. Construction site inspections by the City or its authorized staff would begin with land-disturbing activity and end with final stabilization of exposed soils. After construction, the City would enter an agreement with the homeowners’ association or similar group to ensure that stormwater Best Management Practices continue to function as intended. 4.4 FINDINGS • Stormwater improvements are necessary within the development to meet regulations of the WMO. The Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission’s development rules and standards will apply. • Stormwater improvements would also need to meet the goals of Corcoran’s Local Plan and the Elm Creek TMDL study. • Corcoran has modeling guidelines for hydrology and hydraulics to consistently manage stormwater events in new developments. • To move towards meeting load reduction goals, the City’s Local Surface Water Plan identifies that improvements to water resources will occur with development. November 21, 2019 4-3 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx • Offsite improvements for wetland enhancement will be necessary to manage the additional drainage and allow the City to implement the compliance with the City’s TMDL. Consistent with other large developments and Ravinia, in lieu of a stormwater fee, the offsite improvement contribution will be paid towards a regional project (possibly along the County Ditch #16 or in the Lions Park wetland) that will be combined with grant funds for a larger watershed project. • Downstream identification/mitigation of additional volume will need to be studied further. • FEMA-designated Zone A floodplain is located within/adjacent to the project area. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA is likely required. FEMA floodplain formal approvals will be required and are typically modeled and administered by the City. • The City has recently obtained the LGU responsibility for implementing WCA. November 21, 2019 5-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx 5.0 Transportation 5.1 BACKGROUND This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development on the following intersections: • County Road 116/Olde Sturbridge Road/north development access • County Road 116/66th Avenue N./middle development access • County Road 116/south development access (future only) • County Road 116/Hackamore Road • Hackamore Road/Medina Lake Road/development access • Old Settlers Road/Horseshoe Trail 5.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS For purpose of the traffic impact analysis, the proposed project is assumed to consist of 355 new single-family homes and 196 new townhouses. Three access locations will be provided on CR 116, with one at Olde Sturbridge Road, one at 66th Avenue N. and one midway between 66th Avenue N. and Hackamore Road. One access location will be provided on Hackamore Road at Medina Lake Road. One access will be provided on Horseshoe Trail east of Old Settlers Road. The proposed project is expected to be completed in phases with the entire development complete by 2031. 5.3 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS Additional development was assumed for the property located west of the proposed project. For purpose of this study, is was assumed an additional 100 single family homes would be constructed by 2031 on property to the west. This development would have access to Old Settlers Road and would also be connected to the proposed project through the internal roadway network. 5.4 EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed site consists primarily of vacant land. The project site is bounded by County Road 116 on the east, Hackamore Road on the south, and single family homes to the west and north. Near the site location, County Road 116 is a two-lane undivided roadway with turn lanes at major intersections. Hackamore Road is a two-lane undivided roadway near the site location. Olde Sturbridge Road, 66th Avenue N., Old Settlers Road, and Horseshoe Trail are two-lane undivided roadways. Existing conditions near the proposed project location are described below. County Road 116/Olde Sturbridge Road - This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the westbound approach. The westbound approach consists of one shared left turn/right turn lane. The northbound approach consists of one through lane and one right turn lane. The southbound approach consists of one left turn/through lane and one through lane. November 21, 2019 5-2 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx County Road 116/66th Avenue N. - This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the westbound approach. The westbound approach consists of one shared left turn/right turn lane. The northbound approach consists of one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach consists of one left turn/through lane. County Road 116/Hackamore Road - The signalized intersection provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane on the northbound and southbound approaches. The eastbound and westbound approaches consist of one lane shared by all movements. Hackamore Road/Medina Lake Road - This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the northbound Medina Lake Road approach. All approaches consist of one shared lane for all movements. Old Settlers Road/Horseshoe Trail – This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the eastbound and westbound approaches. All approaches consist of one shared lane for all movements. Turn movement data for the intersections was collected during the weekday a.m. (6:00 - 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (3:00 - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods in January and October 2019. 5.5 TRAFFIC FORECASTS To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2031. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2019 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by nearby uses. • 2031 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2031 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth in the area. In addition, trips from the Ravinia development that will use 66th Avenue N. in the future were added to the roadway network. • 2031 Build. Trips generated by the proposed project and the additional development to the west were added to the 2031 No-Build volumes to determine 2031 Build volumes. Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the tenth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 5-1. November 21, 2019 5-3 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx Table 5-1. Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekda y Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed Project Single Family 355 DU 66 197 263 221 130 351 3351 Townhouses 196 DU 21 69 90 69 41 110 1435 Totals 87 266 353 290 171 461 4786 Future Development Single Family 100 DU 18 56 74 62 37 99 944 Notes: DU=dwelling unit As shown, the project adds 353 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 461 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 4,786 net trips daily. Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 45 percent to/from the south on County Road 116 • 15 percent to/from the north on County Road 116 • 25 percent to/from the east on Hackamore Road • 5 percent to/from the north on Old Settlers Road • 5 percent to/from the west on Horseshoe Trail • 5 percent to/from the south on Arrowhead Drive Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are shown in Tables 5-2 and 5-3. Table 5-2. Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CR 116/Olde Sturbridge Rd/ north development access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing - - - 11 - 3 - 92 0 0 820 - 2031 No-Build - - - 12 - 3 - 125 0 0 932 - 2031 Build 18 0 66 12 0 3 22 147 0 0 939 6 CR 116/66th Ave/ middle development access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing - - - 4 - 1 - 91 0 0 831 - 2031 No-Build - - - 18 - 14 - 111 4 5 939 - 2031 Build 12 0 56 18 0 14 17 143 4 5 1008 4 November 21, 2019 5-4 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx CR 116/south development access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing - - - - - - - 94 - - 838 - 2031 No-Build - - - - - - - 118 - - 960 - 2031 Build 10 - 24 - - - 6 157 - - 1082 3 CR 116/Hackamore Rd EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing 13 57 26 79 9 10 2 71 58 135 693 10 2031 No-Build 23 78 54 89 15 11 10 84 65 152 794 14 2031 Build 23 94 81 89 20 27 19 113 65 204 888 14 Hackamore Rd/ Medina Lake Rd/ development access 2019 Existing - 83 1 3 18 - 1 - 13 - - - 2031 No-Build - 141 1 3 36 - 1 - 15 - - - 2031 Build 6 160 1 3 42 8 1 0 15 24 0 18 Old Settlers Rd/ Horseshoe Tr 2019 Existing 2 0 21 0 2 0 9 5 0 0 6 3 2031 No-Build 2 0 24 0 2 0 13 9 0 0 8 3 2031 Build 2 2 25 3 10 11 16 13 7 4 10 3 Table 5-3. Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CR 116/Olde Sturbridge Rd/ north development access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing - - - 5 - 0 - 678 5 0 133 - 2031 No-Build - - - 6 - 0 - 778 6 0 172 - 2031 Build 12 0 43 6 0 0 74 792 6 0 196 20 CR 116/66th Ave/ middle development access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing - - - 2 - 0 - 683 2 0 138 - 2031 No-Build - - - 10 - 8 - 776 16 13 165 - 2031 Build 8 0 36 10 0 8 61 856 16 13 219 13 CR 116/south development access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing - - - - - - - 691 - - 145 - 2031 No-Build - - - - - - - 799 - - 180 - 2031 Build 6 - 15 - - - 25 934 - - 259 11 CR 116/Hackamore Rd EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing 20 30 11 32 22 55 25 616 72 21 113 11 2031 No-Build 29 43 29 36 41 62 56 708 81 24 135 21 2031 Build 29 52 47 36 57 120 85 810 81 59 194 21 November 21, 2019 5-5 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx Hackamore Rd/ Medina Lake Rd/ development access 2019 Existing - 53 1 14 44 - 1 - 8 - - - 2031 No-Build - 92 1 16 103 - 1 - 9 - - - 2031 Build 19 104 1 16 123 25 1 0 9 15 0 10 Old Settlers Rd/ Horseshoe Tr 2019 Existing 1 2 25 0 0 1 6 5 0 0 4 1 2031 No-Build 1 2 31 0 0 1 8 8 0 0 8 1 2031 Build 1 11 34 14 5 8 10 10 23 11 12 1 5.6 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics, control, and signal timing. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. November 21, 2019 5-6 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. The LOS results for the study intersections are presented in Tables 5-4 and 5-5. Table 5-4. Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results CR 116/Olde Sturbridge Rd/north access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2019 Existing - - - C - C - A A A A - A 2031 No-Build - - - C - C - A A A A - A 2031 Build D D D D D D B A A A A A A CR 116/ 66th Ave/ middle access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing - - - C - C - A A A A - A 2031 No-Build - - - C - C - A A A A - A 2031 Build D D D D D D B A A A A A A CR 116/ south access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2031 Build C - C - - - B A - - A A A CR 116/ Hackamore Rd EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing D A A D A A A A A A A A B 2031 No-Build D A A D A A A A A A A A B 2031 Build D A A D A A A A A A A B B Hackamore Rd/ Medina Lake Rd/ access 2019 Existing - A A A A - A - A - - - A 2031 No-Build - A A A A - A - A - - - A 2031 Build A A A A A A A A A A A A A Old Settlers Rd/ Horseshoe Tr 2019 Existing A A A A A A A A A A A A A 2031 No-Build A A A A A A A A A A A A A 2031 Build A A A A A A A A A A A A A November 21, 2019 5-7 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx Table 5-5. Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results CR 116/Olde Sturbridge Rd/north access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2019 Existing - - - C - C - A A A A - A 2031 No-Build - - - C - C - A A A A - A 2031 Build B B B D D D B A A A A A A CR 116/ 66th Ave/ middle access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing - - - C - C - A A A A - A 2031 No-Build - - - C - C - A A A A - A 2031 Build B B B D D D A A A A A A A CR 116/ south access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2031 Build B - B - B - A A - - A A A CR 116/ Hackamore Rd EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2019 Existing D A A D A A A A A A A A B 2031 No-Build D A A D A A A A A A A A B 2031 Build D A A D A A A A B A A B B Hackamore Rd/ Medina Lake Rd/ access 2019 Existing - A A A A - A - A - - - A 2031 No-Build - A A A A - A - A - - - A 2031 Build A A A A A A A A A A A A A Old Settlers Rd/ Horseshoe Tr 2019 Existing A A A A A A A A A A A A A 2031 No-Build A A A A A A A A A A A A A 2031 Build A A A A A A A A A A A A A Vehicle Queue Lengths at CR 116/Hackamore Road Vehicle queues for the 2019 and 2031 Build scenarios were reviewed to determine impacts on the Hackamore Road approaches. Under existing conditions, both the eastbound and westbound approaches consist of one lane shared by all movements. The resultant queue lengths with existing lane geometrics are shown in Table 5-6. November 21, 2019 5-8 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx Table 5-6. 95th Percentile Vehicle Queue Lengths at CR 116/Hackamore Road Scenario Eastbound approach Westbound approach AM Peak Hour 2019 100’ 117’ 2031 Build 183’ 166’ PM Peak Hour 2019 85’ 115’ 2031 Build 150’ 244’ As shown, the queue lengths are expected to increase on both the eastbound and westbound approaches. In addition to the existing geometrics, vehicle queue lengths assuming the addition of left turn and right turn lanes on the eastbound and westbound approaches were also reviewed. The resultant queue lengths are shown in Table 5-7. Table 5-7. 95th Percentile Vehicle Queue Lengths at CR 116/Hackamore Road Scenario Eastbound Westbound Left turn Through Right turn Left turn Through Right turn AM Peak 2031 Build 46’ 112’ 79’ 119’ 47’ 44’ PM Peak 2031 Build 56’ 73’ 55’ 67’ 77’ 98’ As shown, the queue lengths are reduced compared to the single lane approach results. Traffic Signal Warrants at CR 116/66th Avenue N./middle development access The traffic forecasts for the 2031 Build scenario were used to analyze the peak hour and four hour traffic signal warrants. These volumes include trips from the proposed project as well and trips from the Ravinia development that will use 66th Avenue N. in the future. The traffic volume forecasts were used to determine if specific warrants are satisfied based on published criteria outlined in the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). Warrant 2 (Four-Hour Vehicular Volume) and Warrant 3 (Peak Hour Volume) were assessed. Since the posted speed limit on CR 116 at the intersection is 55 mph, the analyses presented consider reductions for speeds greater than 40 mph. Based on this analysis, warrants are not met, however due to regional traffic pattern changes, internal street patterns, and other unknowns the City will pursue signal options with the County. Impacts on Old Settlers Road Traffic volumes on Old Settlers Road west of Snyder Road are forecast to increase by 710 vehicles per day due to the proposed project by 2031. November 21, 2019 5-9 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx Traffic volumes on Old Settlers Road west of Snyder Road are forecast to increase by 1,760 vehicles per day due to a combination of the proposed project and the additional development by 2031. 5.7 FINDINGS In order to accommodate the 2031 traffic volumes presented in this report, we recommend implementation of the following improvements: 66th Avenue Collector Street • Dedicate 80 foot ROW to preserve future road corridor options. County Road 116/Olde Sturbridge Road/north development access • Construct right turn lane on southbound approach and left turn lane on northbound approach for the development. County approval is required and that process may require additional improvements. County Road 116/66th Avenue North/main development access • Construct right turn lane on southbound approach and left turn lane on northbound approach for the development. • Construct west leg of intersection (66th Ave. extended) at CR 116 with a left turn lane and a right turn lane. • Construction of east leg of intersection is planned as part of Ravinia development. • Future signal was planned with Ravinia and City will pursue County process involving warrants and County policy for installation of a signal at developer cost. • Local street spacing near intersection will be modified during plan review process. Current site plan shows the connection is not allowable due to minimum spacing on collector road. County Road 116/south development access • Construct right turn lane on southbound approach and left turn lane on northbound approach for the development. County approval is required and that process may require additional improvements. • County may require relocation of the proposed access approximately 420 feet north to meet 1/4 mile County spacing requirements. County Road 116/Hackamore Road • Improve Hackamore Road to collector standard to west development property boundary (west of the development’s local street connection). • On Hackamore, construct left turn and right turn lanes on both the east leg and west leg of intersection. This will require coordination with the County and City of Medina regarding right-of-way acquisition, impacts and design details. • Install updated traffic signal control and mitigate trail and any ponding/wetland impacts. • County approval is required and that process may require additional turn lanes on CR 116. Hackamore Road/Medina Lake Road/development access • Construct a westbound right turn lane. November 21, 2019 5-10 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx Old Settlers north of Butterworth Lane • Based on the expected traffic volume increase, pave existing gravel road from north of Butterworth Lane to Horseshoe Trail. Horseshoe Trail • Based on the expected traffic volume increase, pave existing gravel road from Old Settlers Road to the development’s east property boundary. Bluebonnet Drive • Provide ROW and possibly a turnaround meeting City standards at connection to Bluebonnet. Local access to adjacent parcels • Ghost plat and provide ROW for access points to the property adjacent to the northwest (20301 Larkin Road). • Ghost plat and provide ROW for access points to the property address 6421 CR 116 adjacent to the east. Trail Lane ROW • ROW should be extended to cul-de-sac on Trail Lane with street or trail improvements to be considered during plan review process. Local Street Spacing • Plan review process may modify local street intersection spacing. November 21, 2019 6-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx 6.0 Financing 6.1 SUMMARY Financing options of the development necessary for infrastructure and to mitigate impacts typically follow the approach of: • On-site infrastructure is managed by the developer • Upsizing of on-site trunk utilities are provided credit, with eligibility determined during the approval process • Trunk sewer and water fees (TLAC) are being updated in 2019 • Off-site projects are managed by the City (engineering, bidding and construction management) through an escrow The financial package will be further detailed and negotiated as the project moves forward and culminates in the overall Developer Agreement with the overall preliminary plat approval which is updated for each phase of the development. November 21, 2019 7-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The following infrastructure improvements are feasible and necessary to manage the development. These improvements are consistent with similar requirements for other developments in Corcoran, and have shown to be necessary for managing the additional population: Sewer • Option A is recommended, with an estimated cost of approximately $1,450,000 (or $770,000 without including the temporary lift station and force main). This recommendation is made based on analysis presented in the prior feasibility study (Concept 1), as summarized above, and also based on the simple fact that the only technically feasible option for providing sewer service to the added northwestern parcel in the Concept 2 development is to construct the temporary lift station, as described in Option A. • Routing of the offsite 12-inch sewer is conceptual at this point, and minor modifications with respect to routing in/near 66th Avenue North and Park Trail Drive will need to be finalized by the City. However, significant changes to the inverts shown for Option A are not expected. • Routing of the sewer flows from Wessel eastward to the 12-inch sewer that is being extended westward through Ravinia is generally in accordance with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. • The phasing plan will need to be coordinated with sewer shed outlined in this Feasibility Study, since it could potentially result in multiple modifications to the temporary lift station and force main (such costs are not estimated herein). Water • Looping of the development is required, such as the street connection on Horseshoe Trail, which is required to be looped with either the west-central 12-inch water main loop or Old Settlers. • Looping the development back to Ravinia along Hackamore Road with an 8-inch water main is required. • Provide easement along CR 116 for the trunk water connection from 66th Avenue North to the development boundary for the trunk line that will connect at 75th Avenue North (City funded construction project). • At some dead-end water main locations (e.g., J-W4 and J-W9), Wessel will need to ensure that water main stubs are constructed to the property line, such that future development to the west and north of Wessel will eventually allow for additional water main looping. These future loops serve to improve fire flow and water quality within the Wessel development. • At the road entrance to Wessel from Hackamore Road, the City may require construction of an interconnect across Hackamore Road to the City of Medina’s water system, depending on Medina’s mutual interest. Water Resources • Offsite improvements will be necessary to manage the additional drainage and allow the City to implement compliance as identified in the City’s TMDL. Consistent with other large developments and Ravinia, in lieu of a stormwater utility fee, the offsite improvement contribution will be paid towards a regional project (possibly along the November 21, 2019 7-2 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx County Ditch #16 or in the Lions Park wetland) that will be combined with grant funds for a larger watershed project. • FEMA floodplain formal approvals will be required and are typically modeled and administered by the City. • The City has recently obtained the LGU responsibility for implementing WCA. Transportation In order to accommodate the 2031 traffic volumes presented in this report, we recommend implementation of the following improvements: 66th Avenue Collector Street • Dedicate 80 foot ROW to preserve future road corridor options. County Road 116/Olde Sturbridge Road/north development access • Construct right turn lane on southbound approach and left turn lane on northbound approach for the development. County approval is required and that process may require additional improvements. County Road 116/66th Avenue North/main development access • Construct right turn lane on southbound approach and left turn lane on northbound approach for the development. • Construct west leg of intersection (66th Ave. extended) at CR 116 with a left turn lane and a right turn lane. • Construction of east leg of intersection is planned as part of Ravinia development. • Future signal was planned with Ravinia and City will pursue County process involving warrants and County policy for installation of a signal at developer cost. • Local street spacing near intersection will be modified during plan review process. Current site plan shows the connection is not allowable due to minimum spacing on collector road. County Road 116/south development access • Construct right turn lane on southbound approach and left turn lane on northbound approach for the development. County approval is required and that process may require additional improvements. • County may require relocation of the proposed access approximately 420 feet north to meet 1/4 mile County spacing requirements. County Road 116/Hackamore Road • Improve Hackamore Road to collector standard to west development property boundary (west of the development’s local street connection). • On Hackamore, construct left turn and right turn lanes on both the east leg and west leg of intersection. This will require coordination with the County and City of Medina regarding right-of-way acquisition, impacts and design details. • Install updated traffic signal control and mitigate trail and any ponding/wetland impacts. • County approval is required and that process may require additional turn lanes on CR 116. Hackamore Road/Medina Lake Road/development access • Construct a westbound right turn lane. November 21, 2019 7-3 T:\2294-Corcoran\43 Wessel\Report (Concept 2)\Lennar Wessel Development Infrastructure FS - Concept 2 (Nov 2019).docx Old Settlers north of Butterworth Lane • Based on the expected traffic volume increase, pave existing gravel road from north of Butterworth Lane to Horseshoe Trail. Horseshoe Trail • Based on the expected traffic volume increase, pave existing gravel road from Old Settlers Road to the development’s east property boundary. Bluebonnet Drive • Provide ROW and possibly a turnaround meeting City standards at connection to Bluebonnet. Local access to adjacent parcels • Ghost plat and provide ROW for access points to the property adjacent to the northwest (20301 Larkin Road). • Ghost plat and provide ROW for access points to the property address 6421 CR 116 adjacent to the east. Trail Lane ROW • ROW should be extended to cul-de-sac on Trail Lane with street or trail improvements to be considered during plan review process. Local Street Spacing • Plan review process may modify local street intersection spacing. Tables 1 Cost Estimate for Sewer Option 2 Water Distribution System Modeling Results Table 1. Cost Estimates for Sewer Options Sewer Option A Item #Description Qty Units Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization/Demobilization 1 LS 50,000.00$ 50,000$ 2 Clearing & Grubbing 0.5 AC 8,000.00$ 4,000$ 3 Sanitary Sewer (offsite) - 12"2900 LF 95.00$ 275,500$ 4 Sanitary Sewer - Upsize 8" to 10" within Wessel 3500 LF 10.00$ 35,000$ 5 Sanitary Sewer - Upsize 8" to 15" within Wessel 3200 LF 25.00$ 80,000$ 6 Sanitary Manholes (offsite) - 4' diam 9 EA 4,000.00$ 36,000$ 7 Jacked Crossing of CR 116 (1 location)100 LF 400.00$ 40,000$ 8 Turf Establishment Uplands 1.8 AC 2,000.00$ 3,600$ 9 Turf Establishment Wetlands 1.5 AC 6,000.00$ 9,000$ 10 Erosion Control 2900 LF 6.00$ 17,400$ 11 Sewer Force Main - 6" (direct bury w/sewer install) 4600 LF 20.00$ 92,000$ 12 Air Release Manhole w/Valve (6' dia)3 EA 15,000.00$ 45,000$ 13 Sewer Lift Station (temp; later conversion to gravity)1 LS 400,000.00$ 400,000$ Subtotal 1,087,500$ With Contingency (10%)1,196,250$ With Engineering/Legal (15%)1,375,688$ Easements 72,500$ Total 1,448,188$ Notes: 1) Costs are generally for construction outside the Wessel boundary, except where specifically stated otherwise. 2) Easement costs in Corcoran are commonly estimated at $50 per LF; however, given the high percentage of wetland area within the off-development construction segments, a $25 per LF cost was assumed. 3) Sewer construction across 66th Ave N is assumed to be coordinated with the upcoming street reconstruction, and thus no separate pavement restoration is included. 1 of 1 Table 2. Water Distribution System Modeling Results Average Day Demand Node Elevation (ft) Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) J-B1 985 13.4 1,097.9 48.8 1,097.9 48.8 1,155.3 73.7 J-B2 992 5.8 1,097.9 45.8 1,097.9 45.8 1,155.3 70.7 J-B3 970 4.6 1,097.9 55.3 1,097.9 55.3 1,155.3 80.2 J-C1 990 0 1,098.0 46.7 1,098.0 46.7 1,098.0 46.7 J-C2 982 0 1,098.0 50.2 1,098.0 50.2 1,155.3 75.0 J-C3 950 0 1,097.9 64.0 1,097.9 64.0 1,155.3 88.8 J-C4 969 92.3 1,097.2 55.5 1,097.3 55.5 1,155.5 80.7 J-C5 946 0 1,097.2 65.4 1,097.2 65.4 1,155.5 90.6 J-C6 954 0 1,097.2 62.0 1,097.2 62.0 1,155.5 87.2 J-C10 1003 8.5 1,097.1 40.7 1,097.2 40.7 1,155.4 65.9 J-C11 1004 4.6 1,097.2 40.3 1,097.2 40.3 1,155.8 65.7 J-C12 980 0 1,097.9 51.0 1,097.9 51.0 1,155.3 75.9 J-C13 978 0 1,097.8 51.8 1,097.8 51.8 1,155.3 76.7 J-C14 988 0 1,097.4 47.3 1,097.4 47.3 1,155.3 72.4 J-C15 994 12.6 1,097.9 45.0 1,097.9 45.0 1,155.3 69.8 J-C16 990 0 1,097.4 46.5 1,097.4 46.4 1,155.3 71.5 J-C19 1015 26.7 1,097.2 35.6 1,097.2 35.6 1,155.3 60.7 J-C20 1009 0 1,097.3 38.2 1,097.3 38.2 1,155.3 63.3 J-C22 982 0 1,097.5 50.0 1,097.5 50.0 1,155.4 75.0 J-D1 971 4.3 1,097.2 54.6 1,097.2 54.6 1,155.5 79.8 J-D2 971 0 1,097.2 54.6 1,097.2 54.6 1,155.5 79.8 J-D3 973 4.4 1,097.2 53.7 1,097.2 53.7 1,155.6 79.0 J-D4 955 3.8 1,097.2 61.5 1,097.2 61.5 1,155.5 86.8 J-D5 965 48.6 1,097.2 57.2 1,097.2 57.2 1,155.5 82.4 J-D6 973 3.5 1,097.2 53.7 1,097.2 53.7 1,155.7 79.0 J-D7 976 3.1 1,097.2 52.4 1,097.2 52.4 1,155.7 77.7 J-D8 978 5.5 1,097.2 51.6 1,097.2 51.6 1,155.7 76.9 J-D9 975 3.8 1,097.2 52.9 1,097.2 52.9 1,155.7 78.2 J-D10 980 2.8 1,097.2 50.7 1,097.2 50.7 1,155.9 76.1 J-R1 988 2.4 1,097.4 47.3 1,097.3 47.3 1,155.3 72.4 J-R2 994 1.9 1,097.4 44.7 1,097.3 44.7 1,155.3 69.8 J-R3 984 4.9 1,097.3 49.0 1,097.3 49.0 1,155.3 74.1 J-R4 990 5.3 1,097.4 46.5 1,097.3 46.4 1,155.3 71.5 J-R5 986 3.2 1,097.3 48.2 1,097.3 48.2 1,155.3 73.2 J-R6 994 0 1,097.3 44.7 1,097.3 44.7 1,155.3 69.8 J-R7 991 2.4 1,097.3 46.0 1,097.3 46.0 1,155.3 71.1 J-R8 997 0 1,097.3 43.4 1,097.3 43.4 1,155.3 68.5 J-R9 994 3.2 1,097.3 44.7 1,097.3 44.7 1,155.3 69.8 J-R10 1005 3.2 1,097.3 40.0 1,097.3 39.9 1,155.3 65.0 J-R11 999 2.4 1,097.3 42.5 1,097.3 42.5 1,155.3 67.6 J-R12 995 2.4 1,097.3 44.3 1,097.3 44.3 1,155.3 69.3 J-R13 996 2.7 1,097.3 43.8 1,097.3 43.8 1,155.3 68.9 J-R14 996 3.6 1,097.3 43.8 1,097.3 43.8 1,155.3 68.9 J-R15 998 2.7 1,097.3 43.0 1,097.3 43.0 1,155.3 68.1 J-R16 1001 3.4 1,097.3 41.7 1,097.3 41.7 1,155.3 66.8 J-R17 995 3.4 1,097.3 44.3 1,097.3 44.3 1,155.3 69.3 J-R18 998 1.9 1,097.3 43.0 1,097.3 43.0 1,155.3 68.0 J-R19 999 3.4 1,097.3 42.5 1,097.3 42.5 1,155.3 67.6 J-R20 1007 3.4 1,097.3 39.1 1,097.3 39.1 1,155.3 64.2 J-R21 1005 2.4 1,097.3 39.9 1,097.3 39.9 1,155.3 65.0 J-R22 996 7.3 1,097.3 43.8 1,097.3 43.8 1,155.3 68.9 J-R23 989 1.9 1,097.3 46.9 1,097.3 46.9 1,155.3 71.9 J-R24 1007 2.4 1,097.3 39.1 1,097.3 39.1 1,155.3 64.2 J-R25 1016 3.9 1,097.3 35.2 1,097.3 35.2 1,155.3 60.3 J-R26 985 3.9 1,097.3 48.6 1,097.3 48.6 1,155.3 73.7 J-R27 985 5.3 1,097.3 48.6 1,097.3 48.6 1,155.3 73.7 J-R28 995 4.1 1,097.3 44.2 1,097.3 44.2 1,155.3 69.4 J-R29 1005 3.9 1,097.3 39.9 1,097.3 39.9 1,155.3 65.0 J-R30 1000 8.3 1,097.3 42.1 1,097.3 42.1 1,155.3 67.2 J-R31 995 0 1,097.3 44.3 1,097.3 44.2 1,155.3 69.4 J-R32 992 3.4 1,097.3 45.5 1,097.3 45.5 1,155.3 70.6 J-W1 1004 20.9 1,097.1 40.3 1,097.2 40.3 1,155.4 65.5 J-W2 990 19.7 1,097.0 46.3 1,097.2 46.4 1,155.3 71.5 J-W3 993 24.8 1,097.0 45.0 1,097.2 45.1 1,155.3 70.2 J-W4 988 4.1 1,097.0 47.2 1,097.2 47.2 1,155.3 72.4 J-W5 996 10.4 1,097.1 43.7 1,097.2 43.8 1,155.4 68.9 J-W6 1005 19.0 1,097.1 39.9 1,097.2 39.9 1,155.4 65.1 J-W7 992 8.5 1,097.1 45.5 1,097.2 45.5 1,155.4 70.7 J-W8 984 14.1 1,097.1 48.9 1,097.2 49.0 1,155.4 74.1 J-W9 982 3.9 1,097.1 49.8 1,097.2 49.8 1,155.4 75.0 J-W10 1006 0 1,097.1 39.4 1,097.2 39.4 1,155.4 64.6 Total 476 Target Pressure: 35 psi - nodes with pressure less than target are highlighted red SE Corcoran Feed Node Hydraulic Grade Result from Maple Grove Model (ULT MDD - 50 MGD):1,105.9 Wessel Model Feed Hydraulic Grade (assumed): 1098 w/o Loops w/ Loops w/ Loops, Tower, Booster Page 1 of 3 Table 2. Water Distribution System Modeling Results Maximum Day Demand Node Elevation (ft) Demand (gpm) Target Fire Flow (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Fire Flow (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Fire Flow (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Fire Flow (gpm) J-B1 985 43.5 1,500 1,096.8 48.4 3,513 1,096.7 48.3 3,512 1,150.0 71.4 3,124 J-B2 992 19.0 1,500 1,097.3 45.5 5,000 1,097.3 45.5 5,000 1,150.1 68.4 3,453 J-B3 970 15.0 1,500 1,097.4 55.1 5,000 1,097.4 55.1 5,000 1,150.1 77.9 3,680 J-C1 990 0 1,500 1,097.9 46.7 5,000 1,097.9 46.7 5,000 1,098.0 46.7 5,000 J-C2 982 0 1,500 1,097.6 50.0 5,000 1,097.6 50.0 5,000 1,150.1 72.7 3,986 J-C3 950 0 1,500 1,097.5 63.8 5,000 1,097.5 63.8 5,000 1,150.1 86.6 3,980 J-C4 969 300 3,000 1,091.0 52.8 2,241 1,091.3 52.9 2,380 1,151.5 78.9 5,000 J-C5 946 0 1,500 1,090.9 62.7 2,232 1,091.3 62.9 2,367 1,151.5 88.9 5,000 J-C6 954 0 1,500 1,090.8 59.2 2,210 1,091.1 59.3 2,347 1,151.7 85.5 5,000 J-C10 1003 27.7 1,500 1,090.3 37.8 1,643 1,090.8 38.0 1,736 1,150.3 63.7 3,872 J-C11 1004 15 3,000 1,090.5 37.4 1,878 1,090.9 37.6 1,990 1,154.2 65.0 5,000 J-C12 980 0 1,500 1,097.3 50.8 5,000 1,097.3 50.7 5,000 1,150.1 73.6 4,016 J-C13 978 0 1,500 1,096.5 51.3 4,512 1,096.5 51.3 4,507 1,150.0 74.4 3,917 J-C14 988 0 1,500 1,093.0 45.4 2,056 1,092.8 45.3 2,055 1,149.8 70.0 3,471 J-C15 994 41.1 1,500 1,097.3 44.7 4,350 1,097.3 44.7 4,350 1,150.1 67.5 3,286 J-C16 990 0 1,500 1,092.5 44.3 1,930 1,092.2 44.2 1,930 1,149.7 69.1 3,411 J-C19 1015 86.9 1,500 1,090.7 32.8 1,555 1,091.0 32.9 1,635 1,149.9 58.4 3,470 J-C20 1009 0 1,500 1,092.1 36.0 1,369 1,091.6 35.8 1,461 1,149.6 60.8 2,787 J-C22 982 0 1,500 1,093.7 48.3 2,870 1,093.9 48.4 3,017 1,150.9 73.1 4,800 J-D1 971 14.0 3,000 1,090.8 51.8 2,970 1,091.1 52.0 3,114 1,151.9 78.3 5,000 J-D2 971 0 3,000 1,090.8 51.8 2,639 1,091.1 52.0 2,724 1,151.9 78.3 4,955 J-D3 973 14.2 3,000 1,090.7 50.9 2,935 1,091.1 51.1 3,076 1,152.1 77.5 5,000 J-D4 955 12.3 3,000 1,090.7 58.7 2,978 1,091.1 58.9 3,121 1,151.9 85.2 5,000 J-D5 965 158 3,000 1,090.7 54.4 2,930 1,091.1 54.5 3,028 1,151.7 80.8 5,000 J-D6 973 11.4 3,000 1,090.7 50.9 2,844 1,091.0 51.1 2,980 1,152.9 77.8 5,000 J-D7 976 10.1 3,000 1,090.7 49.6 2,009 1,091.0 49.8 2,063 1,152.9 76.6 3,751 J-D8 978 17.9 3,000 1,090.6 48.7 2,767 1,091.0 48.9 2,899 1,153.7 76.0 5,000 J-D9 975 12.3 3,000 1,090.6 50.0 2,198 1,091.0 50.2 2,269 1,153.7 77.3 4,643 J-D10 980 9.2 3,000 1,090.5 47.8 2,648 1,090.9 48.0 2,787 1,155.3 75.9 5,000 J-R1 988 7.9 1,500 1,092.4 45.1 2,293 1,092.1 45.0 2,299 1,149.7 70.0 3,606 J-R2 994 6.3 1,500 1,092.2 42.5 2,254 1,092.0 42.4 2,263 1,149.7 67.4 3,576 J-R3 984 15.8 1,500 1,092.2 46.8 2,287 1,091.9 46.7 2,289 1,149.7 71.7 3,611 J-R4 990 17.4 1,500 1,092.4 44.3 2,356 1,092.2 44.2 2,360 1,149.7 69.1 3,529 J-R5 986 10.3 1,500 1,092.1 45.9 2,295 1,091.8 45.8 2,289 1,149.7 70.8 3,630 J-R6 994 0 1,500 1,092.1 42.4 2,194 1,091.8 42.3 2,211 1,149.7 67.4 3,328 J-R7 991 7.9 1,500 1,092.1 43.7 1,957 1,091.8 43.6 1,960 1,149.7 68.7 2,840 J-R8 997 0 1,500 1,092.1 41.1 2,154 1,091.8 41.0 2,174 1,149.7 66.1 3,233 J-R9 994 10.3 1,500 1,092.1 42.4 1,837 1,091.8 42.3 1,841 1,149.7 67.3 2,727 J-R10 1005 10.3 1,500 1,092.2 37.7 2,159 1,091.9 37.6 2,180 1,149.7 62.6 3,495 J-R11 999 7.9 1,500 1,092.2 40.3 2,122 1,091.9 40.2 2,148 1,149.7 65.2 3,463 J-R12 995 7.9 1,500 1,092.2 42.0 1,812 1,091.9 41.9 1,820 1,149.7 66.9 2,729 J-R13 996 8.7 1,500 1,092.2 41.6 1,460 1,091.9 41.5 1,462 1,149.7 66.5 2,220 J-R14 996 11.9 1,500 1,092.2 41.6 1,616 1,091.9 41.5 1,620 1,149.7 66.5 2,447 J-R15 998 8.7 1,500 1,092.2 40.7 2,084 1,091.8 40.6 2,114 1,149.7 65.6 3,421 J-R16 1001 11.1 1,500 1,092.1 39.4 2,042 1,091.8 39.3 2,078 1,149.7 64.3 3,377 J-R17 995 11.1 1,500 1,092.1 42.0 1,936 1,091.8 41.9 1,989 1,149.6 66.9 3,270 J-R18 998 6.3 1,500 1,092.1 40.7 1,563 1,091.8 40.6 1,581 1,149.6 65.6 2,461 J-R19 999 11.1 1,500 1,092.1 40.3 1,223 1,091.8 40.1 1,230 1,149.6 65.2 1,930 J-R20 1007 11.1 1,500 1,092.1 36.8 1,795 1,091.7 36.6 1,874 1,149.6 61.7 3,121 J-R21 1005 7.9 1,500 1,092.1 37.7 1,327 1,091.7 37.5 1,352 1,149.6 62.6 2,234 J-R22 996 23.7 1,500 1,092.1 41.6 1,741 1,091.7 41.4 1,834 1,149.6 66.5 3,074 J-R23 989 6.3 1,500 1,092.1 44.6 1,741 1,091.7 44.4 1,833 1,149.6 69.5 2,880 J-R24 1007 7.9 1,500 1,092.1 36.8 1,635 1,091.6 36.6 1,749 1,149.6 61.7 2,954 J-R25 1016 12.6 1,500 1,092.1 32.9 1,026 1,091.6 32.7 1,056 1,149.6 57.8 2,008 J-R26 985 12.6 1,500 1,091.8 46.2 2,344 1,091.6 46.1 2,307 1,149.7 71.3 3,691 J-R27 985 17.4 1,500 1,091.7 46.1 2,369 1,091.5 46.1 2,316 1,149.7 71.3 3,729 J-R28 995 13.4 1,500 1,091.5 41.7 1,747 1,091.4 41.7 1,788 1,149.8 67.0 3,550 J-R29 1005 12.6 1,500 1,091.5 37.4 1,763 1,091.4 37.4 1,803 1,149.7 62.6 3,440 J-R30 1000 26.9 1,500 1,091.5 39.6 1,763 1,091.4 39.6 1,803 1,149.7 64.8 3,420 J-R31 995 0 1,500 1,091.6 41.8 1,803 1,091.5 41.8 1,834 1,149.7 66.9 3,442 J-R32 992 11.1 1,500 1,091.6 43.1 1,778 1,091.5 43.1 1,780 1,149.7 68.2 2,676 J-W1 1004 67.9 1,500 1,090.2 37.3 1,645 1,090.7 37.5 1,755 1,150.2 63.3 3,803 J-W2 990 64.0 1,500 1,089.3 43.0 957 1,090.6 43.5 1,532 1,149.6 69.1 2,438 J-W3 993 80.6 1,500 1,089.1 41.6 764 1,090.7 42.2 1,388 1,149.5 67.7 2,222 J-W4 988 13.4 1,500 1,089.3 43.8 876 1,090.6 44.4 1,183 1,149.6 69.9 1,831 J-W5 996 34.0 1,500 1,090.1 40.7 1,606 1,090.7 41.0 1,765 1,150.4 66.8 3,469 J-W6 1005 61.6 1,500 1,090.3 36.9 1,699 1,090.8 37.1 1,794 1,151.1 63.2 4,263 J-W7 992 27.7 1,500 1,089.9 42.3 753 1,090.7 42.7 1,744 1,150.2 68.4 3,373 J-W8 984 45.8 1,500 1,089.9 45.8 1,036 1,090.6 46.1 1,753 1,150.2 71.9 2,856 J-W9 982 12.6 1,500 1,089.9 46.7 994 1,090.6 47.0 1,334 1,150.2 72.8 2,070 J-W10 1006 0 1,500 1,090.2 36.4 1,527 1,090.7 36.6 1,721 1,150.2 62.4 3,484 Total 1550 Target Fire Flow: 1,500 gpm for residential nodes, 3,000 commercial/industrial nodes - nodes with fire flow less than target are highlighted red Target Pressure: 35 psi - nodes with pressure less than target are highlighted red SE Corcoran Feed Node Hydraulic Grade Result from Maple Grove Model (ULT MDD - 50 MGD):1,104.0 Wessel Model Feed Hydraulic Grade (assumed): 1098 w/o Loops w/ Loops w/ Loops, Tower, Booster Page 2 of 3 Table 2. Water Distribution System Modeling Results Peak Hour Demand Node Elevation (ft) Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) J-B1 985 86.9 1,093.5 46.9 1,093.4 46.9 1,134.5 64.7 J-B2 992 37.9 1,095.3 44.7 1,095.3 44.7 1,134.6 61.7 J-B3 970 30.0 1,095.7 54.4 1,095.7 54.4 1,134.7 71.3 J-C1 990 0 1,097.4 46.5 1,097.4 46.5 1,098.0 46.7 J-C2 982 0 1,096.4 49.5 1,096.4 49.5 1,134.8 66.1 J-C3 950 0 1,096.1 63.2 1,096.1 63.2 1,134.9 80.0 J-C4 969 600 1,072.6 44.8 1,073.8 45.3 1,139.6 73.8 J-C5 946 0 1,072.5 54.7 1,073.7 55.2 1,139.8 83.8 J-C6 954 0 1,072.0 51.0 1,073.2 51.6 1,140.3 80.6 J-C10 1003 55.3 1,070.3 29.1 1,071.9 29.8 1,135.2 57.2 J-C11 1004 30.0 1,070.8 28.9 1,072.3 29.5 1,149.5 63.0 J-C12 980 0 1,095.5 50.0 1,095.4 49.9 1,134.7 66.9 J-C13 978 0 1,092.7 49.6 1,092.5 49.5 1,134.5 67.7 J-C14 988 0 1,079.9 39.8 1,079.1 39.4 1,133.5 62.9 J-C15 994 82.2 1,095.3 43.8 1,095.3 43.8 1,134.6 60.8 J-C16 990 0 1,078.1 38.1 1,077.2 37.7 1,133.3 62.0 J-C19 1015 174 1,071.7 24.5 1,072.6 24.9 1,134.1 51.5 J-C20 1009 0 1,076.7 29.3 1,075.0 28.6 1,132.9 53.6 J-C22 982 0 1,082.3 43.4 1,083.0 43.7 1,137.7 67.3 J-D1 971 28.1 1,071.9 43.7 1,073.2 44.2 1,141.3 73.7 J-D2 971 0 1,071.9 43.7 1,073.2 44.2 1,141.3 73.7 J-D3 973 28.4 1,071.7 42.7 1,073.0 43.3 1,142.0 73.1 J-D4 955 24.6 1,071.7 50.5 1,073.0 51.0 1,141.0 80.5 J-D5 965 316 1,071.7 46.2 1,073.0 46.7 1,140.6 76.0 J-D6 973 22.8 1,071.5 42.6 1,072.8 43.2 1,144.9 74.4 J-D7 976 20.3 1,071.5 41.3 1,072.8 41.9 1,144.9 73.1 J-D8 978 35.9 1,071.3 40.4 1,072.7 41.0 1,147.8 73.5 J-D9 975 24.6 1,071.3 41.7 1,072.7 42.3 1,147.8 74.8 J-D10 980 18.4 1,071.0 39.4 1,072.5 40.0 1,153.6 75.1 J-R1 988 15.8 1,077.6 38.8 1,076.6 38.4 1,133.3 62.9 J-R2 994 12.6 1,077.2 36.0 1,076.2 35.6 1,133.3 60.3 J-R3 984 31.6 1,077.0 40.2 1,076.0 39.8 1,133.3 64.6 J-R4 990 34.8 1,077.8 38.0 1,076.9 37.6 1,133.3 62.0 J-R5 986 20.5 1,076.5 39.2 1,075.7 38.8 1,133.3 63.7 J-R6 994 0 1,076.6 35.7 1,075.6 35.3 1,133.2 60.2 J-R7 991 15.8 1,076.6 37.0 1,075.6 36.6 1,133.2 61.5 J-R8 997 0 1,076.7 34.5 1,075.6 34.0 1,133.1 58.9 J-R9 994 20.5 1,076.7 35.8 1,075.6 35.3 1,133.1 60.2 J-R10 1005 20.5 1,077.0 31.2 1,075.9 30.7 1,133.2 55.5 J-R11 999 15.8 1,076.9 33.7 1,075.8 33.2 1,133.1 58.0 J-R12 995 15.8 1,076.9 35.4 1,075.8 35.0 1,133.1 59.7 J-R13 996 17.4 1,076.9 35.0 1,075.8 34.5 1,133.1 59.3 J-R14 996 23.7 1,076.9 35.0 1,075.8 34.5 1,133.1 59.3 J-R15 998 17.4 1,076.9 34.1 1,075.7 33.6 1,133.1 58.5 J-R16 1001 22.1 1,076.8 32.8 1,075.6 32.3 1,133.1 57.1 J-R17 995 22.1 1,076.8 35.4 1,075.5 34.8 1,133.0 59.7 J-R18 998 12.6 1,076.8 34.1 1,075.4 33.5 1,133.0 58.4 J-R19 999 22.1 1,076.7 33.6 1,075.4 33.1 1,133.0 58.0 J-R20 1007 22.1 1,076.7 30.2 1,075.3 29.5 1,133.0 54.5 J-R21 1005 15.8 1,076.7 31.0 1,075.3 30.4 1,133.0 55.4 J-R22 996 47.4 1,076.7 34.9 1,075.2 34.3 1,132.9 59.2 J-R23 989 12.6 1,076.7 38.0 1,075.2 37.3 1,132.9 62.3 J-R24 1007 15.8 1,076.7 30.2 1,075.1 29.4 1,132.9 54.5 J-R25 1016 25.3 1,076.7 26.3 1,075.1 25.5 1,132.9 50.6 J-R26 985 25.3 1,075.6 39.2 1,075.0 38.9 1,133.3 64.2 J-R27 985 34.8 1,075.1 39.0 1,074.7 38.8 1,133.4 64.2 J-R28 995 26.9 1,074.4 34.4 1,074.2 34.3 1,133.4 59.9 J-R29 1005 25.3 1,074.5 30.1 1,074.3 30.0 1,133.4 55.6 J-R30 1000 53.7 1,074.5 32.2 1,074.3 32.1 1,133.4 57.7 J-R31 995 0 1,074.9 34.6 1,074.6 34.4 1,133.4 59.9 J-R32 992 22.1 1,074.9 35.9 1,074.6 35.7 1,133.4 61.2 J-W1 1004 136 1,069.7 28.4 1,071.6 29.3 1,135.1 56.7 J-W2 990 128 1,066.6 33.1 1,071.3 35.2 1,132.9 61.8 J-W3 993 161 1,065.9 31.5 1,071.5 33.9 1,132.6 60.4 J-W4 988 26.9 1,066.5 34.0 1,071.3 36.0 1,132.9 62.7 J-W5 996 67.9 1,069.6 31.8 1,071.6 32.7 1,135.6 60.4 J-W6 1005 123 1,070.3 28.2 1,071.9 28.9 1,138.2 57.6 J-W7 992 55.3 1,068.6 33.1 1,071.5 34.4 1,135.1 61.9 J-W8 984 91.6 1,068.7 36.7 1,071.4 37.8 1,135.1 65.4 J-W9 982 25.3 1,068.7 37.5 1,071.4 38.7 1,135.1 66.2 J-W10 1006 0 1,069.7 27.6 1,071.6 28.4 1,135.1 55.8 Total 3099 Target Pressure: 35 psi - nodes with pressure less than target are highlighted red SE Corcoran Feed Node Hydraulic Grade Result from Maple Grove Model (ULT MDD - 50 MGD):1,101.0 Wessel Model Feed Hydraulic Grade (assumed): 1098 w/o Loops w/ Loops w/ Loops, Tower, Booster Page 3 of 3 Figures 1 Sewer Option A 2 Water Model Pipe Network 3 Average Day Pressure (without Loops) 4 Peak Hour (without Loops) 5 Available Fire Flow (without Loops) 6 Average Day Pressure (with Loops & Future Tower/Booster) 7 Peak Hour Pressure (with Loops & Future Tower/Booster) 8 Available Fire Flow (with Loops & Future Tower/Booster) Sewer Option A Figure 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !?«LS !? !?10101000990980 97099010101000 9901000980 990 1 0 1 0 1000990980 1000 99010009 7 0 980 97098010 2 0 10101010101010101010 1010 10109901000100010001000 1000990980980 990 990990990990990 99098 0 990 98098 0 970970970 980 970980 980 980970 980 980 9 7 0 970 970970 970990 990 990 99 0 990 990 990 980 970 9909801000990 990 980 1000 Connection to 12'' Gravity Sewer (Lennar- Ravinia)9704567116 Trail LaHorseshoe Tr ValleyViewRdParkTrailDrHunter RdOl dSettlersRdCR-116Olde Sturbridge Rd 66thAveN HunterLaElm StButterworthLa Snyder RdTemporary Lift Station Inflow Invert Approx. 955 Inv. 973.9 Inv. 964.2 Inv. 969.3 Inv. 973.7 Inv. 962.5 Inv. 969.7 Inv. 956.1 Inv. 959.7 Inv. 976.8 Inv. 958.2 (Starting point for cost analysis) STUB Inv. 962.2 12'' 12'' 8'' 8'' 15'' 10'' 8'' FM CITY OF CORCORAN - WESSEL DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPT 2) 600 0 600300 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\0043\mxd\Concept 2 Sewer Option A.mxd Date: 10/30/2019 Time: 1:41:35 PM User: ShuJC0243 OCT 2019 Legend Wessel Boundary Parcel Boundaries Proposed Sewer !8'' !10'' !12'' !15'' Force Main !?Proposed Sewer Nodes (Projected Invert Shown)«LS Proposed Temporary Lift Station Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands Index Contours Intermediate Contours Water Model Pipe Network !H #* !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(City of CorcoranCity of Maple GroveCity of Medina 4567101 456750 456710 MohawkDrHackamore Rd TroyLaAbilene La Zir c o n LaHorseshoe Tr Yellowstone La81st Pl C S A H 1 0 CSAH 50 Valley ViewRdPa r k T r a il DrHunterRdCSAH 101Brockton La NCR-116Bass LakeRd Larkin RdCain RdOld S et tler s R d ArrowheadDrMeister Rd WCorcoranTrECorcoranTrGleason RdBlue Bonnet DrMaple Hill Rd1 MG Water Tower J-C2 J-C3 J-C4 J-C16 J-D5 J-D10 J-D3 J-R2 J-R27 J-R24 J-R17 J-R19 J-R16 J-R5 J-D6J-D7 J-R8J-R9 J-R6J-R7 J-R15 J-R10 J-R11 J-R14 J-R12 J-R13 J-R1 J-R3 J-R20 J-R21 J-D8J-D9 J-D1 J-D2 J-R22 J-R23 J-D4 J-R18 J-R26 J-R4 J-C13 J-C11 J-C10 J-C6 J-C5 J-C15 J-C19J-W1 J-W5 J-W9 J-W8 J-C20 J-W3J-W2 J-W4 J-W7 J-W6 J-R28 J-R30 J-R29 J-R31 J-R32 J-C14 J-C12 J-B1 J-B2 J-B3 J-R25 J-C22 J-W10 CITY OF CORCORAN - WESSEL DEVELOPMENT Path: L:\2294\0043\mxd\Concept 2 Pipe Network and Node Labels.mxdDate: 10/30/2019Time: 11:11:27 AM User: ShuJC0243 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Figure 2 OCT 2019 Legend Municipal Boundary Wessel Development Parcel Boundary !(Pipe Nodes #*Booster Pump Station !H 1 MG Water Tower Pipe Network 8'' 12'' 16'' 24'' Average Day Pressure (without Loops) !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(City of CorcoranCity of Maple GroveCity of Medina 4567101 456750 456710 Troy LaHorseshoe Tr BassLakeRd Ol d S ettlersRd Fi el dstone Blvd Abilene La Hackamore Rd 81st Pl Zircon LaVagabond LaCSAH 101U r b a n d a le LaNCSAH 1 0 ValleyViewRdP a r k T r a il DrHunter RdBrockton La NCR-116Larkin Rd Gleason RdBlue Bonnet DrCSAH 50 Maple Hill Rd60 58 56 54 52 50 44 42 60 58 56 54 52 5048 48 4644 42 4046 44 4 2 4 0 4644 4442 38364642605450 44 CITY OF CORCORAN - WESSEL DEVELOPMENT Path: L:\2294\0043\mxd\Concept 2 Average Day Pressure (without Hackamore Loop).mxdDate: 10/30/2019Time: 1:26:58 PM User: ShuJC0243 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Figure 3 OCT 2019 Legend Municipal Boundary Parcel Boundary Wessel Development !(Pipe Nodes Pipe Network 8'' 12'' 16'' 24'' Average Day Pressure (PSI) 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Note: Contour values away from node locations are not necessarily accurate Peak Hour Pressure (without Loops) !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(City of CorcoranCity of Maple GroveCity of Medina 4567101 456750 456710 Troy LaHorseshoe Tr BassLakeRd Ol d S ettlersRd Fi el dstone Blvd Abilene La Hackamore Rd 81st Pl Zircon LaVagabond LaCSAH 101U r b a n d a le LaNCSAH 1 0 ValleyViewRdP a r k T r a il DrHunter RdBrockton La NCR-116Larkin Rd Gleason RdBlue Bonnet DrCSAH 50 Maple Hill Rd444240383634323060 58 56 54 52 50 48 52 50 48 46 44 36 3432 30 28 34 32 32 30 2 8 2 65048 4638 54 4640 363432 CITY OF CORCORAN - WESSEL DEVELOPMENT Path: L:\2294\0043\mxd\Concept 2 Peak Hour Pressure (without Hackamore Loop).mxdDate: 10/30/2019Time: 1:29:14 PM User: ShuJC0243 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Figure 4 OCT 2019 Legend Municipal Boundary Parcel Boundary Wessel Development !(Pipe Nodes Pipe Network 8'' 12'' 16'' 24'' Peak Hour Pressure (PSI) 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 Note: Contour values away from node locations are not necessarily accurate Available Fire Flow (without Loops) !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(City of CorcoranCity of Maple GroveCity of Medina 4567101 456750 456710 Troy LaHorseshoe Tr BassLakeRd Ol d S ettlersRd Fi el dstone Blvd Abilene La Hackamore Rd 81st Pl Zircon LaVagabond LaCSAH 101U r b a n d a le LaNCSAH 1 0 ValleyViewRdP a r k T r a il DrHunter RdBrockton La NCR-116Larkin Rd Gleason RdBlue Bonnet DrCSAH 50 Maple Hill Rd475 0 4500 4250 4000 37 5 0 35 0 0 32 5 0 30 0 0 27 5 0 2 5 0 0 22 5 0 200 0 175 0 125027502500225025 0 0 22 5 0 1500125010001500 10 0 0 150015001250CITY OF CORCORAN - WESSEL DEVELOPMENT Path: L:\2294\0043\mxd\Concept 2 Available Fire Flow (without Hackamore Loop).mxdDate: 10/30/2019Time: 1:25:05 PM User: ShuJC0243 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Figure 5 OCT 2019 Legend Municipal Boundary Parcel Boundary Wessel Development !(Pipe Nodes Pipe Network 8'' 12'' 16'' 24'' Available Fire Flow (GPM) 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 2750 3000 3250 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 Note: Contour values away from node locations are not necessarily accurate Average Day Pressure (with Loops and Future Tower Booster) !( !H #* !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(City of CorcoranCity of Maple GroveCity of Medina 4567101 456750 456710 Troy LaHorse shoe Tr Ba s s L a k e R d Ol d S ettlersRd Fi el dstone Blvd Abilene La Hackamore Rd 81st Pl Zircon LaVagabond LaCSAH 101U r b a n d a le LaNCSA H 1 0 ValleyViewRdP a r k T r a il DrHunter RdBrockton La NCR-116Larkin Rd Gleason RdBlue Bonnet DrCSAH 50 Maple Hill Rd1 MG Water Tower Booster Pump Station 8 8 8 6 8 4 8 2 8 0 7 8 7 6 7 4 7270 68 66 88 86 84 82 80 78 70 68 666866648684747272 70 68 66 76 6 8 6 6 74 90 827672 7070 68 62 CITY OF CORCORAN - WESSEL DEVELOPMENT Path: L:\2294\0043\mxd\Concept 2 Average Day Pressure (with Future Tower Booster).mxdDate: 10/30/2019Time: 1:26:18 PM User: ShuJC0243 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Figure 6 OCT 2019 Legend Municipal Boundary Parcel Boundary Wessel Development !(Pipe Nodes #*Booster Pump Station !H 1 MG Water Tower Pipe Network 8'' 12'' 16'' 24'' Average Day Pressure (PSI) 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 Note: Contour values away from node locations are not necessarily accurate Peak Hour Pressure (with Loops and Future Tower Booster) !( !H #* !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(City of CorcoranCity of Maple GroveCity of Medina 4567101 456750 456710 Troy LaHorse shoe Tr Ba s s L a k e R d Ol d S ettlersRd Fi el dstone Blvd Abilene La Hackamore Rd 81st Pl Zircon LaVagabond LaCSAH 101U r b a n d a le LaNCSA H 1 0 ValleyViewRdP a r k T r a il DrHunter RdBrockton La NCR-116Larkin Rd Gleason RdBlue Bonnet DrCSAH 50 Maple Hill Rd1 MG Water Tower Booster Pump Station 72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 8 0 7 8 7 6 7 4 7 2 7 0 6664626082 80 78 76 74 62 608078 545268 64 74 6 2 58 60 586262 58 CITY OF CORCORAN - WESSEL DEVELOPMENT Path: L:\2294\0043\mxd\Concept 2 Peak Hour Pressure (with Future Tower Booster).mxdDate: 10/30/2019Time: 1:29:36 PM User: ShuJC0243 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Figure 7 OCT 2019 Legend Municipal Boundary Parcel Boundary Wessel Development !(Pipe Nodes #*Booster Pump Station !H 1 MG Water Tower Pipe Network 8'' 12'' 16'' 24'' Peak Hour Pressure (PSI) 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 Note: Contour values away from node locations are not necessarily accurate Available Fire Flow (with Loops and Future Tower Booster) !( !H #* !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(City of CorcoranCity of Maple GroveCity of Medina 4567101 456750 456710 Troy LaBa s s L a k e R d VagabondLaNAbilene La Hackamore Rd 81st Pl Zircon LaFie ldstone Blvd Vagabond LaU r b a n d ale LaNCSAH 101CSA H 1 0 Horse shoe Tr ValleyViewRdP a r k T r a il DrHunter RdBrockton La NCR-116Larkin Rd O l d S ettlersRd Gleason RdBlue Bonnet DrCSAH 50 Maple Hill Rd1 MG Water Tower Booster Pump Station 3500 3250 3000 2750 2500 2250450042504000 375035003250300027502500225047 5 0 450 0 3250300035003 2 5 0 4500425027502500400037502250475035002750 2000CITY OF CORCORAN - WESSEL DEVELOPMENT Path: L:\2294\0043\mxd\Concept 2 Available Fire Flow (with Future Tower Booster).mxdDate: 10/30/2019Time: 1:24:47 PM User: ShuJC0243 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Figure 8 OCT 2019 Legend Municipal Boundary Parcel Boundary Wessel Development !(Pipe Nodes #*Booster Pump Station !H 1 MG Water Tower Pipe Network 8'' 12'' 16'' 24'' Available Fire Flow (GPM) 2000 2250 2500 2750 3000 3250 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 Note: Contour values away from node locations are not necessarily accurate Appendix A Preliminary Phasing Plan for Development 1 2 5 2 3 4 6 7 8 c 1OFCORCORAN PROPERTY CORCORAN, MINNESOTA 11-8-19 JLT JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS xx I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 1 55' SF 65' SF 65' SF 75' SF 75' SF 65' SF 65' SFVILLAS VILLAS LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTHPLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 PHASING PLAN Appendix B Stormwater Modeling Guidelines Stormwater Guidelines for Development March 2019 Issue Cities changing from rural to urban development are challenged by the additional stormwater generated due to construction of impervious surfaces, along with the offsite infrastructure, or lack thereof, to manage effectively. To standardize the modeling and review process, the guidelines below were created for efficiency. Note: A watershed approval is required per Elm Creek WMO rules, which also reviews flow rates, water quality and volume management. Modeling Watershed Information Provide an aerial photo of the development that includes the overall watershed and subwatershed boundaries Provide a summary of the acreage to each discharge point leaving the site. Any increase (or decrease) shall be identified. Show any floodplain adjacent to project or within the project Show downstream water bodies and flow paths o Downstream flow paths and water bodies typically need to have elevations, inverts, and condition identified. Subwatersheds A HydroCAD model (typically used) has inputs that can vary by user. To minimize resubmittals, review time and effort, the following data shall be utilized. Electronic model shall be submitted Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) shall be lowered one category due to the mass grading and compaction of the soils. For example, an existing B soil, shall be modeled as a proposed C soil (unless it remains undisturbed) Wetlands, filtration basins, and ponds shall be modeled at CN of 98 Identify peak rates for storm events and proposed shall be equal or less than existing rates. o Note: There are certain conditions where at City’s discretion the off-site conditions require a reduction in flow rate from existing rates. SWMM (i.e. EPA-, XP-, or PC-) models can be submitted for review, however these increase review time. Model Setup for Outlet Control Structures, NWLs and Infiltration The model’s flow control structures (OCS, culverts, etc.) shall match the construction plan information. During the plan and model review both may be modified and revised Individual detail plates are required for each OCS, and individual plates shall have inverts identified A pond or wetland NWL (and model starting elevation) shall be set at the constructed outlet control elevation. o No live storage shall be utilized below the controlling OCS elevation. o No live storage shall be used for filtration shelves on ponds below controlling OCS elevation 2 T:\2294-Corcoran\33-Pulte Homes\Stormwater Modeling Guidelines for Development.docx If a pond or wetland has an NWL (wet surface), infiltration shall not be used in flood routing. If a pond has filtration BMP causing drawdown below the NWL, this drawdown elevation shall not be used as the NWL for flood routing. (Filtration has a slower release time and during wet periods is not available as live storage). Construction Plans Catch Basins Street drainage shall be sufficient to manage the 10-year event Typical a CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly Three inches (0.25 feet) of head on a CB will inundate a street centerline (2% slope). Spacing is 200 to 250 feet using longitudinal street dimensions of 40 feet from road centerline to half the house footprint (assumes rear half of house drains to rear yard). Dimensions equal 10,000 SF. CBs may be required on both sides of ped ramps to capture flows Natural Drainage Features Waterbodies receiving urban drainage (wetlands, ditches, gullies) may need to have OCS installed, erosion protection, or reduced flow rates to allow the feature to function over the long term due to more consistent flows from increased impervious via development Offsite work may be necessary and City will assist with coordination, easements, etc. HWLs and EOFs The freeboard requirements are: o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the HWL o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the EOF EOFs shall be accurately shown and as builts are required. The highest point shall be the EOF (for example top of curb) since this is the controlling elevation o In certain instances, channel calculations of the swale may be required to show the EOF has capacity to manage estimated flow Overland EOFs are preferred, however if a second pipe serves as an EOF then modeling will include a 100-year event using the second pipe (EOF) as the only outlet (primary outlet plugged). Rear Yards Rear yards or swales less than 2% shall have draintile. Typically, every two to three lots will require rear yard CBs. Sump Connections Houses adjoining a wetland or pond do not need individual sump connection Others will have access to rear yard stormsewer. Offsite Impacts Adjacent Parcels City will review adjacent parcels (downstream and upstream) for impacts from volume, point discharge, etc. and may require off site improvements. City will assist in coordination of any off site work. Off site water quality improvement projects may be determined by the City for assistance with compliance with City’s TMDL approach of implementing improvements upon development. FEMA modifications may be necessary due to development and implemented by City. Toll Free: 800-472-2232 Email: wenckmp@wenck.com Web: wenck.com CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us Memo To: Planning (Planner Lindahl) From: Director Gottschalk Date: May 7, 2020 Re: Tavera Plan Review A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on 05/06/2020. In attendance were: Director of Public Safety Gottschalk, Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Fire Chief Feist, Fire Chief Dave Malewicki, Fire Chief Leuer, Building Inspector Todd Geske, and Code Compliance Official Pritchard. The following are comments from the meeting: 1. In this plan, the private roads will be serving as fire apparatus roads which will require that specific construction requirements are met, and that parking will be restricted. This also raises some public safety concerns as it relates to availability of visitor parking and snow removal and storage feasibility for the association (as it relates to maintaining hydrant access, driveway access, necessary passable roadway width, and sight lines). As the project progresses, public safety will need additional detail for the private roads, including planned hydrant locations. 2. For the larger structures, demonstration of the 300 ft. hose pull access (for non-sprinkled structures) and 150 ft. hose pull access (for sprinkled structures) will need to be demonstrated. 3. Structure proximity in several locations could trigger increased building code requirements based on the small setbacks. 4. Public safety recommends exploring an emergency access option on the northwest cul-de-sac. This memo serves as a preliminary review and assumes that all specifications not articulated in the concept meet City standards. Additional fire and building codes will apply. April 21, 2020 Kendra Lindahl, AICP City Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran MN 55340 RE: Tavera Preliminary Plat and PUD proposal Dear Kendra: Lennar is pleased to submit this application for a Rezone, PUD, Preliminary Plat, and grading permit for a 549-home community located at the corner of HWY 116 and HWY 47 (Hackamore Road) in Corcoran. The properties that make up the proposed community are currently used as vacant or agricultural land with some residential and agricultural buildings located on them. The parcels are zoned Urban Reserve and are guided for low density residential growth in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The community will be named Tavera and is planned to be developed in approximately 10 phases. Four types of housing are proposed with varying floorplans and options introducing a true “aging in place” housing opportunity in the City of Corcoran. Home Types Tavera will provide additional lifecycle housing opportunities within the City of Corcoran. Home styles proposed are intended to supplement what is already being constructed in Corcoran, as well as the northwest area of the Twin Cities Metro. A brief description of each home type is below: Liberty Townhomes – These townhomes are approximately 1700 -1800 square feet in size, feature 3 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, a 2-car garage and potential slab on grade or walkout or lookout basement configurations. Liberty townhomes are designed to attract young professionals, young families, potential divorcees or active adults that may not want a villa home. They will provide another homestyle currently not offered within the city and are intended to provide a more attainable housing choice, expanding upon the “age in place” housing options within the community. An association will be formed for exterior maintenance on units, as well as snow removal and common landscape maintenance. City officials can visit these townhomes in our Rush Creek Commons community, located in Maple Grove. Twinhomes – Lennar is proposing a newly designed twin home that is not garage forward and has an entrance on the front of the home. The twin homes will be association maintained and intended for the active adult or “empty nester” segment of the market. Floorplans are approximately 1600 square feet and include 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms on the main floor with a spacious kitchen/dining area and family room. A basement may be included with optional finishes that include a recreation room, additional bedroom and bathroom, and a storage area. These Twinhomes could provide an attractive main floor living home with a lower price point than the Villa homes. Villa Homes – Similar to what was approved in Ravinia, these homes are targeted towards active adults or empty nesters. Floorplans range from approximately 1600 to 1800 square feet and incorporate 2-car, 3-car, basement and slab on grade offerings. 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms are offered in a typical floorplan. An association will be formed for landscape and snow removal service. Single Family homes – Lennar has significantly diversified our single-family home offerings. As was discussed at the concept plan review in September, Lennar is proposing a variety of single-family homes. These homes vary in size and configuration and are intended to appeal to young families or couples, as well as first and second time move-up buyers and more established families. They are available in traditional two story and single level floorplans with walkouts, lookouts, and full basements. Square footages range from approximately 2,000 square feet up to 3,700 square feet, depending on the chosen floorplan and options. Floorplans include 3+ bedrooms, 2+ bathrooms, and 2 and 3-car garages, as well as varying basement finishes or options. All architectural materials, colors, textures, and accents on all elevations are designed to provide some design variation while also visually unifying the neighborhood, similar to Ravinia. Community Benefits The primary PUD request from Lennar is relaxation of the City’s conventional zoning & development regulations for this challenging piece of property, primarily for lot sizes and setbacks. Proposed development regulations are included on site plan pages in the planset. In exchange for this flexibility, Lennar wishes to offer the following community benefits that will benefit Tavera as well as the City of Corcoran: Enhanced Landscape/buffering – Landscaping is proposed that exceeds minimum city requirements for homesites and buffer areas. Enhanced landscaping and screening provide privacy against the Oak Ridge neighborhood to the north. Screening is also provided along Hackamore for proposed townhomes along the southern border of the community. A landscape buffer is included along CR-116 within the 60-foot setback area. All three buffer and screening areas utilize coniferous and hardwood species and are intended to replace some of proposed tree removals onsite. Over 900 trees are proposed throughout the community to screen and soften the appearance of hardscaped areas. Environmental Preservation – A total of 68.9 acres of wetlands are present on-site. A total of 2.76 acres of wetland impacts are proposed, meaning that 96% of the on-site wetlands will remain preserved. Additionally, a total of 57 acres of woodlands are located on site. Of the 57 acres of wooded areas, 45 acres are designated as Ecologically Significant areas in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A total of 30 acres of all wooded areas are proposed to be saved. This acreage includes 21 of the 45 acres of Ecologically Significant areas identified in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Public Park & trail dedication – Public park land dedication is proposed that totals 4 acres. While it was noted that a park is not planned in this area of the City, Lennar recognizes the need for a larger open space within Tavera and ultimately a public amenity in this section of Corcoran. Additionally, Lennar is proposing 9,450 lineal feet (1.8 miles) of interior trails throughout the community. Entrance Monuments & Corner Treatment – Two primary entry monuments are proposed at the entrances from CR 116 and Hackamore. These entry monuments will provide a sense of place upon arrival into Tavera. As a PUD benefit, Lennar is also proposing a corner treatment feature that signifies entry into Corcoran for motorists heading west on Hackamore or coming north along CR 116. These signage and wayfinding features have been preliminarily identified but options and final designs are still being explored at this time. Architecture – Architectural materials, colors, and textures will be comparable to Ravinia. Lennar prides itself on our interior and exterior design and strives to deliver an excellent value to the marketplace through high quality, durable, cost effective and low maintenance materials. Exterior stone accents are made of a composite that is proven to withstand weathering over time. Siding consists of our standard vinyl packages that require virtually no maintenance and are warrantied up to 50 years. Additionally, we are proposing LP trim around windows and doors, similar to Ravinia. All architectural elements, materials, colors, and textures are designed to provide façade variation while still achieving a unifying visual theme throughout the neighborhood. Architectural sample renderings are included as part of this submittal. Sample floorplans are also included for twin homes, newer villa designs, and liberty townhomes with basements. Schedule Lennar is anticipating to secure entitlements and a grading permit this year. Upon completion of first phase earth work, we would look to install utilities and streets and ultimately plan to have a model home ready for the 2021 parade of homes. We are looking forward to creating another quality Lennar community in the City of Corcoran. Please contact me with questions. Regards, Paul J. Tabone Land Entitlement Mgr Lennar Minnesota CSAH 50 WCorcoranTrECorcoranTrC S A H 1 0 CSAH 50 EagleRidge R d Trail Haven RdKalk RdLarkin Rd Larkin Rd Larkin Rd Larkin Rd Kalk RdCates Lon g horn Rd Horseshoe Tr Horseshoe Tr Trail Ln Valley View RdElm StTrail LnSnyder RdO l d S e t t l e r s R dtterworth L nOl d S e t t l e r s R dOld Settlers Rd70th Ave N BuBluebell Tr NArrowhead DrBluestem RdNSummerhill Ln Summerhill Ln Bluestem RdNMohawk DrLost Horse Rd Katrinka Rd S e t t l e r s Rd SettlersCtMedinaLakeDrFoxberry DrPinto DrHackamore Rd Hackamore RdHackamore CirElm Ridge Cir63rd Ave N Hunter RdHunterLn ParkTrailDr66th A v e N Gleason RdGlea s o n P k w y Elderberry Ct Prairie S a g e L n Ln L u p i n e Bluestem LnSteeple LnGol d e n r o d T r l Berg Dr Calamus C ir Primrose L n a m o t So r r e l C t Annabelle Ln CarriageWayPaddockLn 66thAve N Cedar Ln NBirdiePathL a r k s p u r r LnLarkspurrCt CSAH 101CSAH 101Brockton Ln NFir Ln NCSAH 10 74th Ave N 75th Ave N CSA H 1 0 Maple Hill Rd75th Ave NCommerce St WCommerce St ECommerce StAugerAve CSAH 50 CR-116CR-116Abilen e L nBuckskin TrC im a r r o n C i r Blue Bonnet DrOld Sturbridge DrOlde Sturbridge Rd PLYMOUTH MEDINA CORCORAN Fieldstone VegabondCt N63rd Pl N Blvd 68th Ave NTroy LnBass Lak e R d Hacka m o r e R d I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-COVR 0.01COVER SHEET PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONSLEGEND SHEETCOVER SHEETSHEET INDEX0.010.021.01-1.02 3.01-3.05 TAVERA PRELIMINARY PLAT & P.U.D. PLAN CORCORAN, MINNESOTA R PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN PRELIMINARY SANITARY & WATER PLAN4.01-4.055.01-5.05 7.01-7.05 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL DETAILS8.01-8.05 PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER PLAN6.01-6.24 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT2.01-2.06 WETLAND IMPACT PLAN9.01-9.02 WETLAND BUFFER PLAN9.11-9.15 PRELIMINARY PHASING PLAN10.01 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-LGND 0.02LEGEND c XOFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH XX-XX-20 PJC/BNM XXX Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS XX-XX-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota 42299 Peter J. Hawkinson EX-SURV-BASE-119128.DWG 1.01EXISTING CONDITIONS c XOFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH XX-XX-20 PJC/BNM XXX Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS XX-XX-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota 42299 Peter J. Hawkinson EX-SURV-BASE-119128.DWG 1.02EXISTING CONDITIONS c67OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH4-21-20PJC/BNMMPC/MSNNameReg. No.DateRevisions1.DateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS4-21-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT2.01 c67OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH4-21-20PJC/BNMMPC/MSNNameReg. No.DateRevisions1.DateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS4-21-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT2.02 c67OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH4-21-20PJC/BNMMPC/MSNNameReg. No.DateRevisions1.DateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS4-21-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT2.03 c67OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH4-21-20PJC/BNMMPC/MSNNameReg. No.DateRevisions1.DateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS4-21-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT2.04 c67OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH4-21-20PJC/BNMMPC/MSNNameReg. No.DateRevisions1.DateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS4-21-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT2.05 c67OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH4-21-20PJC/BNMMPC/MSNNameReg. No.DateRevisions1.DateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS4-21-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT2.06 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE 3.01PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE 3.02PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE 3.03PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE 3.04PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE 3.05PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 4.01PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 4.02PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 4.03PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 4.04PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 4.05PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 5.01PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 5.02PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 5.03PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 5.04PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 5.05PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION BUILDING REQUIREMENTS: LOW OPENING 2' + HWL 1' + EOF I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.01PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.02PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.03PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.04PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.05PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.06PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.07PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.08PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.09PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.10PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.11PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.12PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.13PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.14PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.15PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.16PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.17PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.18PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.19PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.20PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.21PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.22PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.23PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-GRAD 6.24PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN WETLAND NAME IMPACT AREA (SF) WETLAND A 25,252 WETLAND C 8,994 WETLAND D 14,600 WETLAND E 7,447 WETLAND H 1,718 WETLAND I 25,710 WETLAND J 397 WETLAND K 230 WETLAND L 5,056 WETLAND N 15,411 WETLAND O 2,818 WETLAND T 6,127 WETLAND U 1,869 WETLAND V 965 WETLAND X 903 WETLAND Y 2,666 TOTAL 120,163 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-IMPACT 9.01WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND NAME IMPACT AREA (SF) WETLAND A 25,252 WETLAND C 8,994 WETLAND D 14,600 WETLAND E 7,447 WETLAND H 1,718 WETLAND I 25,710 WETLAND J 397 WETLAND K 230 WETLAND L 5,056 WETLAND N 15,411 WETLAND O 2,818 WETLAND T 6,127 WETLAND U 1,869 WETLAND V 965 WETLAND X 903 WETLAND Y 2,666 TOTAL 120,163 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-IMPACT 9.02WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND REQUIRED AVERAGE PROVIDED BUFFER NAME BUFFER AREA (S.F.)AREA (S.F.) WETLAND B 160,550 189,326 WETLAND C 121,952 137,407 WETLAND E 89,661 95,417 WETLAND F&G 65,428 70,953 WETLAND I-N 53,026 60,747 WETLAND I-S&L 138,950 141,213 WETLAND J 11,397 12,817 WETLAND K 38,208 49,961 WETLAND M 20,699 23,273 WETLAND N 17,985 22,357 WETLAND O 55,076 76,521 WETLAND P & Q 45,200 52,527 WETLAND R 39,881 59,973 WETLAND S 10,288 13,866 WETLAND T-N 91,571 135,025 WETLAND T-S 21,294 23,366 WETLAND U 19,735 23,234 WETLAND V 11,397 12,718 WETLAND W 6,849 11,262 TOTAL 1,019,147 1,211,963 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 05-21-2020 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 9.11WETLAND BUFFER PLAN WETLAND REQUIRED AVERAGE PROVIDED BUFFER NAME BUFFER AREA (S.F.)AREA (S.F.) WETLAND B 160,550 189,326 WETLAND C 121,952 137,407 WETLAND E 89,661 95,417 WETLAND F&G 65,428 70,953 WETLAND I-N 53,026 60,747 WETLAND I-S&L 138,950 141,213 WETLAND J 11,397 12,817 WETLAND K 38,208 49,961 WETLAND M 20,699 23,273 WETLAND N 17,985 22,357 WETLAND O 55,076 76,521 WETLAND P & Q 45,200 52,527 WETLAND R 39,881 59,973 WETLAND S 10,288 13,866 WETLAND T-N 91,571 135,025 WETLAND T-S 21,294 23,366 WETLAND U 19,735 23,234 WETLAND V 11,397 12,718 WETLAND W 6,849 11,262 TOTAL 1,019,147 1,211,963 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 05-21-2020 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 9.12WETLAND BUFFER PLAN WETLAND REQUIRED AVERAGE PROVIDED BUFFER NAME BUFFER AREA (S.F.)AREA (S.F.) WETLAND B 160,550 189,326 WETLAND C 121,952 137,407 WETLAND E 89,661 95,417 WETLAND F&G 65,428 70,953 WETLAND I-N 53,026 60,747 WETLAND I-S&L 138,950 141,213 WETLAND J 11,397 12,817 WETLAND K 38,208 49,961 WETLAND M 20,699 23,273 WETLAND N 17,985 22,357 WETLAND O 55,076 76,521 WETLAND P & Q 45,200 52,527 WETLAND R 39,881 59,973 WETLAND S 10,288 13,866 WETLAND T-N 91,571 135,025 WETLAND T-S 21,294 23,366 WETLAND U 19,735 23,234 WETLAND V 11,397 12,718 WETLAND W 6,849 11,262 TOTAL 1,019,147 1,211,963 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 05-21-2020 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 9.13WETLAND BUFFER PLAN WETLAND REQUIRED AVERAGE PROVIDED BUFFER NAME BUFFER AREA (S.F.)AREA (S.F.) WETLAND B 160,550 189,326 WETLAND C 121,952 137,407 WETLAND E 89,661 95,417 WETLAND F&G 65,428 70,953 WETLAND I-N 53,026 60,747 WETLAND I-S&L 138,950 141,213 WETLAND J 11,397 12,817 WETLAND K 38,208 49,961 WETLAND M 20,699 23,273 WETLAND N 17,985 22,357 WETLAND O 55,076 76,521 WETLAND P & Q 45,200 52,527 WETLAND R 39,881 59,973 WETLAND S 10,288 13,866 WETLAND T-N 91,571 135,025 WETLAND T-S 21,294 23,366 WETLAND U 19,735 23,234 WETLAND V 11,397 12,718 WETLAND W 6,849 11,262 TOTAL 1,019,147 1,211,963 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 05-21-2020 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 9.14WETLAND BUFFER PLAN WETLAND REQUIRED AVERAGE PROVIDED BUFFER NAME BUFFER AREA (S.F.)AREA (S.F.) WETLAND B 160,550 189,326 WETLAND C 121,952 137,407 WETLAND E 89,661 95,417 WETLAND F&G 65,428 70,953 WETLAND I-N 53,026 60,747 WETLAND I-S&L 138,950 141,213 WETLAND J 11,397 12,817 WETLAND K 38,208 49,961 WETLAND M 20,699 23,273 WETLAND N 17,985 22,357 WETLAND O 55,076 76,521 WETLAND P & Q 45,200 52,527 WETLAND R 39,881 59,973 WETLAND S 10,288 13,866 WETLAND T-N 91,571 135,025 WETLAND T-S 21,294 23,366 WETLAND U 19,735 23,234 WETLAND V 11,397 12,718 WETLAND W 6,849 11,262 TOTAL 1,019,147 1,211,963 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 05-21-2020 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 9.15WETLAND BUFFER PLAN 1 2 5 2 3 4 6 7 8 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 67OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20 PJC/BNM MPC/MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 4-21-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 00-ENG-119128-SHEET-PHASE 10.01PRELIMINARY PHASING PLAN c OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 4-21-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 00-PLAN-119128-SHEET-LAND.DWG 7LANDSCAPE PLANJLT/TLM L1 JLT/TLM SHEET L2 SHEET L3 SHEET L4 SHEET L5 SHEET L6 SHEET L7 c OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 4-21-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 00-PLAN-119128-SHEET-LAND.DWG 7LANDSCAPE PLANJLT/TLM L2 JLT/TLM c OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 4-21-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 00-PLAN-119128-SHEET-LAND.DWG 7LANDSCAPE PLANJLT/TLM L3 JLT/TLM c OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 4-21-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 00-PLAN-119128-SHEET-LAND.DWG 7LANDSCAPE PLANJLT/TLM L4 JLT/TLM c OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 4-21-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 00-PLAN-119128-SHEET-LAND.DWG 7LANDSCAPE PLANJLT/TLM L5 JLT/TLM 7LANDSCAPE PLANJLT/TLM L6 JLT/TLM c OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 4-21-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 00-PLAN-119128-SHEET-LAND.DWG 7LANDSCAPE PLANJLT/TLM L7 JLT/TLM c OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 4-21-20Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1.Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 4-21-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 00-PLAN-119128-SHEET-LAND.DWG 1 2 3 4 5 67 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 c 3OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA 4-21-2020 JLT JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS xx I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson T1LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTHPLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN TREE PRESERVATION NOTES TREE PROTECTION DETAIL 2 1 2 67 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 c 3OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA 4-21-2020 JLT JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS xx I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson T2LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTHPLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 2 3 4 5 12 13 c 3OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA 4-21-2020 JLT JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS xx I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson T3LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTHPLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN TREE PRESERVATION NOTES TREE PROTECTION DETAIL 2 1032 Seventh Street West, Suite 150 | Saint Paul, MN 55102 | mnrinc.us | 612.310.6260 October 28, 2019 Paul Tabone Lennar 16305 36th Ave. N. Plymouth MN 55446 RE: Woodland Assessment County Rd. 116 Properties, Corcoran, MN Mr. Tabone, Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. (MNR) conducted a woodland assessment on October 23rd and 24th for the approximate 270.3 acre survey area located west of County Rd. 116 and north of Hackamore Road in Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The purpose of this woodland assessment is to provide to the City of Corcoran accurate information pertaining to the composition and condition of the woodlands that are located throughout the site. For this assessment, sixteen separate woodland areas and a few areas of large individual trees were evaluated (Figure 1). In general, within the site are two types of woodland and include an oak & other hardwood deciduous dominant woodland and an altered, mixed hardwood & softwood deciduous dominant woodland. Within both types of woodland, the invasive, non-native shrub common buckthorn was observed at varying levels from low to high in all sixteen woodland areas that were evaluated. On figures 2 and 3 of this report the boundary of each woodland area is delineated and categorized as either one of the two general woodland types. Also included in this report are representative photos for each of the tree areas that depict the typical make-up of each area. The following is a general description for each of the sixteen tree areas that were evaluated and includes information about the general make up, topography, and condition of each wooded area along with a list of tree species observed within the overstory and understory. Tree Area 1 Tree Area 1 is located in the northeast part of the overall site and is approximately 4.4 acres in size. This area is bordered by agricultural land and Tree Area 2 to the northwest and a large wetland to the east. Steeper slopes with roughly 20-30’ of elevation change occur within the eastern part of the area where large oak trees were observed along the hillside. Tree Area 1 is an oak dominated woodland with a mix of other common hardwood deciduous trees typical of a mesic oak forest. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at low to moderate levels throughout this woodland area. In general the area consists of scattered large oaks with DBH’s ranging in size from 18-30” with a mix of other hardwood and softwood trees that range in size from 6-16” in DBH. Oak trees make up nearly all of the trees that are over 20” in DBH. Sugar maple make up a very small component of this woodland and are typically small trees in a couple areas within the understory. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 1 include: bur oak, white oak, red oak, black cherry, bitternut hickory, basswood, sugar maple, ironwood, box elder, green ash, and American elm. Common Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. – Woodland Assessment County Rd. 116 Properties – Corcoran, Minnesota 2 understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 1 include: American elm, common buckthorn, choke cherry, basswood, and sugar maple. Tree Area 2 Tree Area 2 is located in the northeast part of the overall site and is approximately 4.8 acres in size. This area is bordered by agricultural land on three sides (north, west & south sides) and Tree Area 2 to the east. The area has approximately 10’ of elevation change from east to west where it slopes down toward the surrounding fields. Tree Area 2 is an altered, hardwood & softwood deciduous dominated woodland with a mix of tree species that are typical of woodland areas that have been influenced by past land uses. Barbed wire fencing was observed surrounding most of this area which would indicate the area had been used as pasture sometime in the past. In general, the area is dominated by young green ash, box elder and American elm trees that range in size from 6-20” in DBH along with a few scattered large oak and basswood trees that are over 20” in DBH. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at moderate levels throughout this woodland area. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 2 include: bur oak, red oak, basswood, box elder, green ash, and American elm. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 2 include: box elder, common buckthorn, green ash, prickly-ash, elderberry, and currant. Tree Area 3 Tree Area 3 is located in the central part of the overall site and is approximately 8.7 acres in size. This area is bordered by agricultural land on three sides (north, east & south sides) and a large wetland also to the east. The area has approximately 25’ of elevation change from west to east where it slopes down toward the adjacent field and Wetland I. The western part of this area is relatively level with less change in elevation compared to the eastern part where a moderately steep slope occurs. Tree Area 3 is an altered, hardwood & softwood deciduous dominated woodland with a mix of tree species that are typical of woodland areas that have been influenced by past land uses. Barbed wire fencing was observed in a few areas which would likely indicate the area had been used as pasture sometime in the past. In general, the area is dominated by a mix of hardwood and softwood trees that range in size from 6-22” in DBH. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at moderate to high levels throughout this woodland area with buckthorn very heavy within the nearly level area surrounding Wetlands F and G. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 3 include: basswood, bur oak, red oak, box elder, bitternut hickory, black cherry, quaking aspen, red maple, sugar maple, green ash, and American elm. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 3 include: box elder, common buckthorn, basswood, bitternut hickory, and American elm. Tree Area 4 Tree Area 4 is located in the southern part of the overall site and is approximately 10.6 acres in size. This area is bordered by existing homes to the north, open grassland to the east and Tree Area 5 to the south. The area is relatively level with approximately 10’ of elevation change from one side to the other. Tree Area 4 is an altered, hardwood & softwood deciduous dominated woodland with a mix of tree species that are typical of woodland areas that have been influenced by past land uses. In general, the area is dominated by a mix of hardwood and softwood trees that range in size from 6-20” in DBH. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at moderate to high levels throughout this woodland area with buckthorn very heavy within the northern 2/3’s of the area. Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. – Woodland Assessment County Rd. 116 Properties – Corcoran, Minnesota 3 Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 4 include: basswood, box elder, green ash, American elm, black cherry, and bur oak. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 4 include: common buckthorn and American elm. Tree Area 5 Tree Area 5 is located in the southern part of the overall site and is approximately 7.6 acres in size. This area is bordered by an existing home to the west, pasture to the east, Hackamore Road to the south, and Tree Area 4 to the north. An existing home and garage occur within Tree Area 5 and there is roughly 10’ of elevation change from one side to the other. About a quarter of this woodland has maintained turf grass growing at the ground layer under mature hardwood trees. Tree Area 5 is an oak dominated woodland with a mix of other common hardwood deciduous trees typical of a mesic oak forest. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at moderate to high levels within the part of the woodland that is not currently being used as yard. In general the area consists of many large oaks with DBH’s ranging in size from 18-30” with a mix of other hardwood and some softwood trees that range in size from 6-20” in DBH. Oak trees make up nearly all of the trees that are over 20” in DBH. Sugar maple make up a very small component of this woodland and are typically small trees that range in size from 6-14” in DBH. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 5 include: bur oak, white oak, red oak, black cherry, bitternut hickory, basswood, sugar maple, red maple, ironwood, box elder, cottonwood, and American elm. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 5 include: box elder, common buckthorn, choke cherry, and bitternut hickory. Tree Area 6 Tree Area 6 is located in the northwest part of the overall site along the northern property boundary and is approximately 1.2 acres in size. This area is bordered by agricultural land and a wetland to the south, upland grassland to the east, and Tree Area 7 to the west. A waterbody channel flows through this woodland where spoil piles flank each side of the channel. Tree Area 6 has approximately 10’ of elevation change from side to side with most elevation change occurring from the water body channel up to the top of the spoil piles. Tree Area 6 is an altered, hardwood & softwood deciduous dominated woodland with a mix of tree species that are typical of woodland areas that have been influenced by past land uses. Cottonwood trees were the most common tree observed within the woodland. In general, the area is dominated by young cottonwood, green ash, box elder, and black cherry trees that range in size from 6-20” in DBH. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at low levels throughout this woodland area. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 6 include: cottonwood, box elder, black cherry, bur oak, and green ash. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 6 include: American elm, common buckthorn, green ash, and gray dogwood. Tree Area 7 Tree Area 7 is located in the northwest part of the overall site along the northern and western property boundaries and is approximately 2.9 acres in size. This area is bordered by a large wetland to the south and Tree Area 6 to the east. Tree Area 7 has approximately 10’ of elevation change from the northern side to the southern side located next to the wetland. Tree Area 7 is an altered, hardwood & softwood deciduous dominated woodland with a mix of tree species that are typical of woodland areas that have been influenced by past land uses. Young box elder trees were the most common tree observed within the woodland. In general, the area is dominated mainly by young box elder, with some green ash, quaking aspen, and cottonwood trees that range in size from 6-14” in DBH. Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. – Woodland Assessment County Rd. 116 Properties – Corcoran, Minnesota 4 Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at low levels throughout this woodland area. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 7 include: box elder, cottonwood, green ash, and quaking aspen. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 7 include: green ash, common buckthorn, box elder, cottonwood, and smooth sumac. Tree Area 8 Tree Area 8 is located in the northwest part of the overall site and is approximately 0.6 acres in size. This area is bordered by a large wetland to the north and an agricultural field to the south. Tree Area 8 has roughly 2’ of elevation change from the southern side to the northern side of the tree line. Tree Area 8 is an altered, hardwood & softwood deciduous dominated woodland with just box elder trees occurring within a very narrow area between the wetland and fallow field. Young box elder trees are the only tree species that occurs within this woodland. Some common buckthorn were observed within this woodland but at low levels. Tree Area 9 Tree Area 9 is located in the northwest part of the overall site and is approximately 0.4 acres in size. This area is bordered by a large wetland to the east and a fallow agricultural field to the west. Tree Area 9 has roughly 8’ of elevation change from the western side to the eastern side next to the wetland. Tree Area 9 is an altered, hardwood & softwood deciduous dominated woodland with box elder trees and common buckthorn occurring throughout the woodland. Young box elder trees are the only tree species that occurs within this woodland. Heavy levels of common buckthorn were observed within this woodland along with young box elder and a few small black cherry saplings. Tree Area 10 Tree Area 10 is located in the north-central part of the overall site and is approximately 4.0 acres in size. This area is positioned on both sides of a large wetland and has a fallow agricultural field bordering it to the north. Tree Area 10 has roughly 6’ of elevation change from both sides down to the wetland that is in the middle of the woodland. Tree Area 10 is an altered, hardwood & softwood deciduous dominated woodland with a nearly complete overstory cover of box elder trees occurring as an even-aged stand. Young box elder trees are the only dominant tree species within the woodland with a couple of young silver maple trees also observed. Common buckthorn occurs at moderate to high levels throughout this woodland with elderberry also very common. Tree Area 11 Tree Area 11 is located in the northern part of the overall site and is approximately 0.4 acres in size. This small woodland area is bordered by upland grassland to the east and west and two wetland areas to the north and south. Tree Area 11 has roughly 6’ of elevation change from one side to the other. Two water body channels intersect this woodland in a north-south orientation. Tree Area 11 is an oak dominated woodland with a mix of common hardwood deciduous trees. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at low to moderate levels within the woodland. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 11 include: red oak, basswood, green ash, and American elm. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 11 include: common Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. – Woodland Assessment County Rd. 116 Properties – Corcoran, Minnesota 5 buckthorn, green ash, bur oak, and American elm. In general the area consists of a mix of hardwood trees with DBH’s ranging in size from 6-16”. Oak and basswood trees were the most common tree species observed within this woodland. Tree Area 12 Tree Area 12 is located in the southern part of the overall site and is approximately 2.8 acres in size. This area is bordered by agricultural land and a small wetland to the south, a large wetland to the west, and Tree Area 13 to the north. Within this woodland area there is roughly 20’ of elevation change from the high point in the eastern part down to the woodland edge next to the wetland on the western side. Tree Area 12 is an oak dominated woodland with a mix of other common hardwood deciduous trees typical of a mesic oak forest. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at low to moderate levels throughout this woodland area. In general the area consists of scattered large oaks with DBH’s ranging in size from 18-30” with a number of bitternut hickory and black cherry trees that range in size from 6-12” in DBH. Most of the understory is covered with box elder saplings and young buckthorn. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 12 include: bur oak, red oak, black cherry, bitternut hickory, ironwood, basswood, green ash, and American elm. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 12 include: common buckthorn, ironwood, box elder, elderberry, bitternut hickory, and American elm. Tree Area 13 Tree Area 13 is located in the southern part of the overall site and is approximately 4.3 acres in size. This area is bordered by fallow agricultural land to the north, an existing home to the east, and a large wetland to the south. The area has approximately 20’ of elevation change from the north and west sides down toward the wetland along the south side of the woodland. Tree Area 13 is an altered, hardwood & softwood deciduous dominated woodland with a mix of tree species that are typical of woodland areas that have been influenced by past land uses. Barbed wire fencing was observed within this area which would indicate the area had been used as pasture sometime in the past. In general, the area is dominated by young green ash, box elder and American elm trees that range in size from 6-22” in DBH along with a few scattered large oak and basswood trees that are over 20” in DBH. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at moderate levels throughout this woodland area. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 13 include: bur oak, red oak, basswood, box elder, green ash, black cherry, and American elm. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 13 include: box elder, common buckthorn, and basswood. Tree Area 14 Tree Area 14 is located in the northern part of the overall site and is approximately 1.7 acres in size. This area consists of two narrow strips of woodland that border agricultural fields and a horse pasture within the site. Tree Area 14 is an altered, hardwood & softwood deciduous dominated woodland with mostly box elder trees and some cottonwood, green ash, and American elm trees. Other trees observed include black cherry and a few younger basswood. In general the range in size of trees within this woodland is from 6-20” in DBH. Some common buckthorn was also observed within this woodland but at low levels. Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. – Woodland Assessment County Rd. 116 Properties – Corcoran, Minnesota 6 Tree Area 15 Tree Area 15 is located in the northern part of the overall site and is approximately 0.2 acres in size. This small woodland area is bordered by agricultural land all around it. Tree Area 15 has roughly 15’ of elevation change from the northern side to its southern side. Tree Area 15 is an oak dominated woodland with a mix of other common hardwood deciduous trees. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at low levels only around the perimeter of the woodland and not within its interior. In general the area consists of trees that range in size from 6- 19” in DBH. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 15 include: bur oak, red oak, basswood, green ash, bitternut hickory, and box elder. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 15 include: common buckthorn, bitternut hickory, choke cherry, and American elm. Tree Area 16 Tree Area 16 is located in the northern part of the overall site along the northern boundary line and is approximately 0.2 acres in size. This small woodland area is bordered by fallow agricultural land to the south. Tree Area 16 has roughly 10’ of elevation change from its western side down to its eastern side. Tree Area 16 is an oak dominated woodland with a mix of other common hardwood deciduous trees. Common buckthorn, an invasive, non-native shrub/small tree occurs at moderate levels within the part of the woodland located on-site. In general the area consists of trees that range in size form 6-18” in DBH. Tree species observed within the overstory of Tree Area 16 include: red oak, basswood, green ash, bitternut hickory, and American elm. Common understory trees and shrubs observed within Tree Area 16 include: common buckthorn, green ash, bitternut hickory, basswood, bur oak, and American elm. MNR appreciates the opportunity to provide this woodland assessment to assist Lennar and your project planning team. If you have any questions regarding this woodland assessment, feel free to contact me. Respectfully submitted, Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. Ken Arndt Sr. Forest Ecologist Certified Arborist MN4033A Hackamore Rd Horseshoe Tr Old Se t t lers RdTrail LaPintoDr66th Ave N OldeSturbridge Rd Valley View RdElm StTrail La Butterworth LaSnyder RdCounty Rd 116Tree Assessment Area Survey Area (appx. 270 ac.) ¯ Tree Assessment Areas County Rd. 116 Properties Corcoran, MN 0 500 1,000250Feet Figure 1 Area 5 Source: 2016 color 7-county Parcels (Hennepin County) Area 2 Area 13 Area 3 Area 12 Area 4 Area 6 Area 1 Area 14 Area 10Area 8 Area 9 Area 15 Area 11 Area 7 Area 16 968 10089769761002976 1010 9709821008972966 976976970988974976 9729669 7 4 978976976976 996998 1000968972996998970976 998 972 9781004996 97299498099 6 99497697299697 2 974 9689829881002974 970 9781012 976 976 1002 976 972 1010968978 970 994 982 976994 9969721004 9709 7 0 972 9 7 8 96897610029701 0 0 8 984 990 1 0 0 0 980 974 1010988 9901008 998 10081010966 9749761004 998 980 9709709949749789761004 972 982 974 996970 10001000970974966970 990 9741000 9 8 8 1000 976 100699610041006 9 8 8 9781006 988 9721004966 992 9 9 8 1004 10089701010 1006988982 966 98297010109701008988 9849761006994 97099410101010978 1008 1006 982 1 0 0 0 986 996994 984 1002 970 1002972100499897098498697897610049781012 986 9809741002 976976984 10061000998 970 100410 0 8 972976 101 0968 10101008984 9709969721006986 978 96896898 4 980978 1006 986100010081000 998 98010109 9 8 1006 97 8982 9 9 21008100 2 10029761 0 0 4 9861002996 9861002 9709701004 1000 9881008984 984100697699 2 9721004 10 0 2 978 97410 1 0 984 98 8988 1010974984 10089781002982978 978 96 6 9841004 976 99098 2 970978976 99 6 996 996 984982 9 9 0 10 0 0 1006998 996 976 974 984990 99 2 1004 1000976 10069949881002 1008980984982 9861000 99697297296898 6982982990984988982 978 976972 986 9 9 0 984 1002 980 1008 98697010 0 8 974 9741006 10089989969681002 1004988976 9949849869741000 1004992982 99 0 976 980 984982986980988970 990988 984 99210021004976972986 1006 10061002986 978982 974 978 1 0 0 4 980972984982 97 6 992 988990994 968 100097 2 990 986970 9 8 8 996980992994998980984982974976978Oak & other Hardwood Survey Area (appx. 270 ac.) ¯ Tree Assessment Areas - North County Rd. 116 Properties Corcoran, MN 0 400 800200Feet Figure 2 Area 10 Source: 2016 color 7-county Parcels (Hennepin County) Area 16 Area 1Area 2 Altered, Hardwood & Softwood Deciduous Dominant Woodland Deciduous Dominant Woodland Area 7 Area 9 Area 8 Area 6 Area 14 Area 15 Area 11 Area 3 22" Green Ash 21"(2) Basswood 26" Basswood18/16" Bur Oak 25" Basswood 36" Bur Oak 29" Basswood 19" Basswood 20/12/12" Willow 20" Cottonwood 9849861002984 996 986 994 9729 9 2 986 986 1012 984 974986980 9849961000 99 0 984974 984974970986972 984 10 0 8 990986 984 996 9 8 2 986990984 9929849849849869 8 6 9 8 2 986 9 8 6 984980986 988 982986984 986984 1008 986992 970970 988 986 98410109929841004 1006982 992984996986984 992 9 8 6 9949849821008 98 4 996 980 984 974 986 972 9869901008996 9841008 998 9849929949921006 996982996 996 996 990994 9869 9 4 994 984994 9909949889869 9 410109869909881004 984 984994984 994 984984982986 98 4100099699210101010 9961004 984980984 982992984990 99210069921006984980 994992996992986974 9949841006 1004982 1004970 9801010 99699099298499099499 2990 100 81006 984 994 9881000 992984 994 992 990982 988994990 994 984 9 9 6 1004994990 986 9 8 4 9901002996 984982988 992 9929901008 994 988 9901 0 0 2 9909829 9 4984 10009909821002 982990 99 8 992 994980982986 984 976 988 99299499699610069869901004 986 988 984 984 984972992 972986974 990986990978 1002 990 990 994 98 6 9941000 992998988976996 974100610041008984 994 988992 978 990 976 9909949929 9 0 978 9909929969981000 98898 8 988 9889 9 2 1002988 980 986 982986 984 Oak & other Hardwood Survey Area (appx. 270 ac.) ¯ Tree Assessment Areas - South County Rd. 116 Properties Corcoran, MN 0 250 500125Feet Figure 3 Area 5 Source: 2016 color 7-county Parcels (Hennepin County) Area 13 Area 12 Area 4 Area 3 Altered, Hardwood & Softwood Decidous Dominant Woodland Deciduous Dominant Woodland Small Group ofSpruce Trees 30" Bur Oak 25" Box Elder 30" Bur Oak 14" Box Elder 16" Elm 14" Box Elder Woodland Assessment Representative Photos Woodland Assessment, Representative Photos Page 1 of 7 Tree Area 1 Tree Area 1 Tree Area 2 Tree Area 2 Photo of Tree Area 1 of large oaks that are typical of the sloped hillside. Photo of Tree Area 1 of upper area above hillside where trees are younger in age. Photo of Tree Area 2 of typical composition of scattered large oak and basswood with younger box elder, elm and green ash. Photo of Tree Area 2 of young box elder trees which are found throughout the area. Woodland Assessment, Representative Photos Page 2 of 7 Tree Area 3 Tree Area 3 Tree Area 4 Tree Area 4 Photo of Tree Area 3 of area with deciduous hardwood trees common within the eastern part of the area. Moderate to heavy levels of buckthorn (green foliage). Photo of Tree Area 3 of area with deciduous softwood trees common within the central and western parts of the area. Heavy levels of buckthorn (green foliage). Photo of Tree Area 4 of softwood deciduous species like box elder and green ash with buckthorn which is typical for much of the woodland area. Photo of Tree Area 4 of mixed area of softwood and hardwood deciduous species which is more common in the southern part of the woodland area. Woodland Assessment, Representative Photos Page 3 of 7 Tree Area 5 Tree Area 5 Tree Area 6 Tree Area 6 Photo of Tree Area 5 that is typical of area around house and out buildings where large open areas are present. Photo of Tree Area 5 that is typical of area where woodland is still intact (eastern and southern part of Tree Area 5). Photo of Tree Area 6 of woodland on both sides of channel that flows through area. Photo of Tree Area 6 of typical cottonwood trees common throughout the area. Woodland Assessment, Representative Photos Page 4 of 7 Tree Area 7 Tree Area 7 Tree Area 8 Tree Area 9 Photo of Tree Area 7 of young box elder trees which are common throughout the area. Photo of Tree Area 7 of north western part of woodland which transitions to very young trees and open grassland. Photo of Tree Area 8 of young box elder trees which are common throughout the whole area. Photo of Tree Area 9 of box elder and green ash trees which are common throughout area. Buckthorn is heavy in this area (dark green foliage). Woodland Assessment, Representative Photos Page 5 of 7 Tree Area 10 Tree Area 11 Tree Area 12 Tree Area 12 Photo of Tree Area 10 of young, even-aged box elder trees which comprise nearly all of this woodland area. Photo of Tree Area 11 of most of the woodland area. Photo of Tree Area 12 of typical mix of oak, hickory, basswood and ironwood that is found throughout woodland area. Photo of Tree Area 12 of part of the woodland that slopes down to Wetland L where basswood is common and lower of levels of buckthorn are present. Woodland Assessment, Representative Photos Page 6 of 7 Tree Area 13 Tree Area 13 Tree Area 14 Tree Area 14 Photo of Tree Area 13 of young box elder trees which are common throughout the woodland. Photo of Tree Area 13 of young box elder trees with scattered large hardwood trees which are less common throughout the woodland. Photo of Tree Area 14 of the western side of area along property line. Photo of Tree Area 14 of the eastern part of the area where the woodland is a tree line between two fields. Woodland Assessment, Representative Photos Page 7 of 7 Tree Area 15 Tree Area 16 Photo of Tree Area 15 of the whole woodland. Photo of Tree Area 16 of nearly all of the woodland with oak to the left and American elm and green ash to the right. June 3, 2020 Via Email to City Administrator, Brad Martens The Honorable Ron Thomas, Mayor of Corcoran, Members of the Corcoran City Council, and Members of the Corcoran City Council Planning Commission Corcoran City Hall 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Re: Lennar Tavera Development Dear Mayor Thomas, Members of the Corcoran City Council and Planning Commission, Please accept this letter as my objection to Lennar’s proposed 549-unit development at the northwest corner of County Road 116 and Hackamore Road. By way of introduction, my name is Mark Lanterman. My family and I are transplants from the east coast who settled in Minnesota approximately 25 years ago. In 2012, my wife, our nine children, and I were fortunate to have found our home in Corcoran, just north of the proposed development. For reasons I will enumerate in greater detail below, I respectfully oppose Lennar’s development proposal because it requests that the City provide variances from the City Code that are not warranted under the circumstances. This letter is intended to convey an objective analysis of the development proposal. To be clear, I do not flatly oppose the development, rather only those aspects of the proposal that do not comply with the Code. I note further that there may be facts of which I am unaware. So to the extent that there are, please forgive any misstatement or omission of the same. Lennar’s requests for smaller lot sizes and shorter setbacks should be denied by Corcoran City Council. My understanding is that Lennar has requested, among other things, flexibility from the setback and lot size requirements set forth in the City Code. (See Lennar Ltr. to City Planner, Apr. 21, 2020, “The primary PUD request from Lennar is relaxation of the City’s conventional zoning & development regulations for this challenging piece of property, primarily for lot sizes and setbacks.”). I think it is fair to characterize this ask of the Council as a “variance.”1 The City Code prohibits the grant of a variance unless an applicant (e.g., Lennar) shows the following: A. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. E. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. F. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. (Corcoran City Code § 970.030(a-f)) Lennar has failed to meet these requirements.2 I have had the benefit of discussing the issues with a courteous and helpful representative from Lennar, who indicated that the reasons for the variance request are the wetlands, woodlands, and the general topography of the lot(s). This explanation does not make sense. In context, Lennar’s observations about the property do not necessitate smaller lots or shorter setbacks. Indeed, Lennar could fully comply with the Code, obviating the need to request smaller lots and shorter setbacks, by building fewer units. Lennar has previously complied with these impositions with its Ravinia development. Lennar’s claims about the uniqueness or “challenges” of the property are nothing more than a front for economic considerations and the company’s potential profit on the proposed development. (See Corcoran City Code § 1070.040 subd. 2(b), “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.”) In 2014, Lennar and its subsidiaries, to include its mortgage arm, were sued by the federal government for violations of the False Claims Act. The Complaint alleged that Lennar “…engaged in a regular, nationwide practice of reckless origination and 1 As the Council is no doubt aware, variances are “…A modification or variation of the provisions of this Ordinance where it is determined that by reason of special and unusual circumstances relating to a specific lot, that strict application of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties, or that strict conformity with the provisions of this Ordinance would be unreasonable, impractical or unfeasible under the circumstances.” (Corcoran City Code § 1020.020). 2 I am unaware of whether the procedural requirements and formalities for requesting a variance have been made by Lennar. (Corcoran City Code § 1070.040 subd. 3(b)). underwriting of its…loans.” (United States v. Lennar, et al., No. 14-cv1435-RSM, W.D. Wash., 2014. Compl. ¶ 3.5). The Complaint further alleged that “[t]he extremely poor quality of [Lennar’s] loans was a function of management’s nearly singular focus on increasing…[Lennar’s] profits…” (Id. ¶ 3.7). In 2018, Lennar settled the case, and paid the federal government $13.2 million in exchange for the government’s dismissal of the claims. I have attached the relevant court documents to this letter. As a citizen of Corcoran, I fear that Lennar’s endeavor would come at a cost to our potential future neighbors/citizens, drowning them in debt, and also harm the community by leaving foreclosed upon or vacant homes. Its request for leniency, and the reasons cited for it, underscore a theme that is unfortunately in lockstep with the above-cited court case—profit. While I do not condemn Lennar’s entrepreneurial spirit, it is simply not a good enough reason to grant the variances in lot size and setbacks. Here, Lennar attempts to soften the enormity of its request by referring to it as “relaxation.” To be clear, the request goes beyond a minor divergence from the City Code, but instead asks for the code to be rewritten as applied to dozens, if not hundreds, of housing units. Indeed, Lennar has requested that, in some cases, the lot size requirement be cut by 72%. This is more than “relaxation,” and is instead a significant request that is tailored to allow Lennar to cram as many units as it can into as small a space as possible. For me and my neighbors, this Council’s decision will literally hit close to home. The proposed development leaves our homes with the same amount of breathing room that a stop sign has from parked cars (30 feet). While I generally hold property rights sacrosanct, property rights are not absolute rights that give developers unfettered authority to develop as they please. Indeed, the Council has a high level of discretion in approving developments. As such, I respectfully request that the Council deny Lennar’s proposal as currently planned and invite Lennar to amend the plan to comply with the City’s Code for the reasons described above. I sincerely appreciate the Council’s and the Planning Committee’s service to the residents of our great city, and the careful consideration of these issues. Sincerely, Mark Lanterman 6936 Oak Ridge Road, Corcoran Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 1 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 2 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 3 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 4 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 5 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 6 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 7 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 8 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 9 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 1 Filed 09/18/14 Page 10 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 22 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 2 Case 2:14-cv-01435-RSM Document 22 Filed 10/16/18 Page 2 of 2 1 Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:RE: Lennar's Tavera development From: Mark Lanterman <mlanterman@compforensics.com> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 11:55 AM To: Brad Martens <bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us> Cc: Jonathan Bottema <jbottema@ci.corcoran.mn.us>; Alan Schultz <ASchultz@ci.corcoran.mn.us>; Brian Dejewski <BDejewski@ci.corcoran.mn.us>; Tom Anderson <tanderson@ci.corcoran.mn.us>; Ron Thomas <rthomas@ci.corcoran.mn.us> Subject: Lennar's Tavera development Brad, Thank you for sharing the link to the Planning Committee meeting this evening. I unfortunately did not get a chance to consider the content of the letter regarding the Tavera development from Landform, which was included in the Planning Commission’s June 4, 2020 packet/agenda. I am not sure what the extent of Landform’s involvement is, but I suppose they are retained by the City. Please accept this email as a minor supplement to my letter of June 3, 2020. I ask that this email be circulated to the Planning Committee, and included as part of the record. As to lot sizes, I noted that Landform’s letter analyzes the denser part of the planned development as if it were to be zoned RMF‐1, following PUD. (Landform Ltr., May 28, 2020, at 8, "The townhomes were reviewed against the RMF‐1 district standards."). RMF‐1 has smaller lot size requirements, from which Lennar is still asking for variance (5,400sf ‐ 2,100sf = 3,300sf (e.g., 60% decrease in lot size between requirements and the requested variance). Therefore, the reasoning I outlined in my letter yesterday remains instructive. The RMF‐1 zone is for properties guided medium density. (Corcoran City Code Section 1040.060). If part of the property will be zoned RMF‐1, it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which guides the area to low‐density. The letter from Landform does not note whether Lennar has requested an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan other than to the Sanitary Sewer Staging. (Landform Ltr., May 28, 2020, at 3). This zoning/density issue is distinct from, but very much related to, the lot size requirements. I believe that lot size requirements are the central issue, and Landform’s letter seems to further the classification of the request as merely “flexibility.” It is my position that this is more than flexibility, and the comparison of the requested variance to the requirements of a different zoning district is merely a way to minimize the optics of this immense variance request. Thank you very much. Mark From: Brad Martens <bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us> Date: Thursday, June 4, 2020 at 8:19 AM 2 To: Mark Lanterman <mlanterman@compforensics.com> Subject: RE: Planning Commission meeting Good morning Mark, Here is a link to the packet with information to join on the first page: https://www.ci.corcoran.mn.us/our_government/commissions/planning_commission/agenda_packets/2020 I did receive your letter and forward to the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran 763‐400‐7030 www.ci.corcoran.mn.us From: Mark Lanterman <mlanterman@compforensics.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 7:32 PM To: Brad Martens <bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us> Subject: Planning Commission meeting Brad‐ Would you please send me a link to attend tomorrow night’s meeting? And could you confirm receipt of my letter from earlier this afternoon. Thanks. Mark Mark Lanterman Chief Technology Officer ComputerForensic Services Pence Building 800 Hennepin Avenue, 5th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55403 952‐924‐9920 office mlanterman@compforensics.com www.compforensics.com STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10a. Council Meeting: June 25, 2020 Prepared By: Jessica Christensen Buck Topic: COVID-19 Preparedness Plan Action Required: Approval Summary: Cities are required by Executive Order 20-74 to develop and implement a COVID-19 Preparedness Plan beginning on June 29, 2020. The Preparedness Plan must be in accordance with the industry guidance set forth by the Stay Safe Minnesota plan. Plans are required to have, at a minimum, content including remote working options, ensuring sick workers stay home, social distancing measures, work hygiene and source control, and cleaning, disinfection, and ventilation protocols. The proposed Preparedness Plan has been attached to this report and correlates to the phases that have been set forth by the Governor and his Stay Safe Minnesota plans. Due to the uncertainty of COVID-19 and additional information that continues to arise, staff is requesting that Council allows for amendments to be made by the City Administrator, as applicable, following adoption and implementation. Staff is recommending that the Council approves the COVID-19 Preparedness Plan as presented and authorize the closure of City Hall through phase 3. Financial/Budget: A finance code has been developed for all COVID-19 related expenditures. These are unbudgeted items that staff will request reimbursements for as allowed. Options: 1. Approve the COVID-19 Preparedness Plan as presented; authorize the closure of City Hall through phase 3. 2. Approve the COVID-19 Preparedness Plan with amendments; authorize the closure of City Hall through phase 3. Recommendation: Approve the COVID-19 Preparedness Plan as presented; authorize the closure of City Hall through phase 3. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve the COVID-19 Preparedness Plan as presented; authorize the closure of City Hall through phase 3. Attachments: 1. COVID-19 Preparedness Plan COVID-19 Preparedness Plan June 29, 2020 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota Contents Introduction and Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 3 Preparedness Plan ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Infection Prevention Measures ..................................................................................................................... 3 Screening and Policies for Employees Exhibiting Signs and Symptoms of COVID-19 ................................... 6 Employee Privacy .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Thresholds for Re-Opening City Facilities ..................................................................................................... 9 Communications and Training .................................................................................................................... 14 Authority to Change or Modify ................................................................................................................... 14 Appendix A: Resources ............................................................................................................................... 16 Appendix B: Hand Washing ........................................................................................................................ 18 Appendix C: Wearing Cloth Face-Coverings and Social Distancing ............................................................. 19 Appendix D: How and When to Wear Cloth Face-Coverings ...................................................................... 20 Appendix E: Sanitation Schedule and Checklist .......................................................................................... 21 Appendix F: How to Remove Gloves ........................................................................................................... 23 Appendix G: COVID-19 Symptoms .............................................................................................................. 24 Appendix H: Preventative Measures .......................................................................................................... 25 Appendix I: City of Corcoran COVID-19 Pay - FFCRA ................................................................................... 26 Appendix J: Families First Coronavirus Response Act ................................................................................. 28 Appendix K: Stay Safe Minnesota Plan ....................................................................................................... 29 Appendix L: Work Guidelines for COVID-19: Administration ..................................................................... 35 Appendix M: Work Guidelines for COVID-19: Public Works ....................................................................... 36 Appendix N: COVID-19 Police Department Decon ..................................................................................... 37 Appendix O: COVID-19 Phased Release and Protocol ................................................................................ 38 Appendix P: Pandemic Guidelines for Corcoran Staff ................................................................................. 40 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota Introduction and Purpose The City of Corcoran is committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace for all employees , residents, and visitors. To ensure that, we have developed the following Preparedness Plan in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in addition to orders and directives from the Federal, State, and local levels. Management and workers are equally responsible for supporting, implementing, complying with, and providing recommendations to further improve all aspects of this COVID-19 Preparedness Plan. Employees are encouraged to continue to report any suggestions or concerns they have related to being at work and COVID-19. Preparedness Plan The COVID-19 Preparedness Plan is administered by Brad Martens, City Administrator, who maintains the overall authority and responsibility for the plan. Our COVID-19 Preparedness Plan follows the State of Minnesota Industry Guidance, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Guidelines, and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) guidelines as well as federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards related to safety and health precautions required in response to COVID-19. The plan addresses the following: •Hygiene and respiratory etiquette; •Controls for social distancing; •Housekeeping – cleaning, disinfecting, decontamination, and ventilation; •Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) •Drop-off, pick-up, and delivery practices and protocols; •Prompt identification and isolation of sick persons; •Communications and training that will be provided to managers and employees; and •Management and supervision necessary to ensure effective implementation of the plan. In addition, there are several resources at the end of this document including policies and procedures that have been developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that provide further details. Infection Prevention Measures (1)Hygiene and Respiratory Etiquette Basic infection prevention measures are being implemented at our workplaces. Employees are instructed to wash their hands for at least 20 seconds with soap and water frequently throughout the day, but especially at the beginning and end of their shift, prior to any mealtimes, and after using the bathroom. All visitors to the facility will be encouraged to wash or sanitize their hands prior to or immediately upon entering the facility through signage posted in the building (Appendix Item B). Some locations have hand sanitizer (made up of at least 60% 3 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota alcohol) that can be used for hand hygiene in place of soap and water if hands are not visibly soiled. Employees should avoid touching their eyes, nose, and mouth with unwashed hands. Employees and visitors are being encouraged through signage to wear face-coverings while at City facilities (Appendix Item C). Additionally, the City will have tissues and trash receptacles available to all employees and visitors located throughout the buildings. Hand sanitizer will be available throughout City facilities for employee, resident, and visitor use. Employees will be reminded of this through this plan as well as through email, supervisor updates to staff, and posters. Employees may leave their workstations at any time to wash their hands. Spray sanitizer and/or hand sanitizer are also available; if employees need additional sanitizer, it can be requested through their supervisor or the Emergency Operations Center (EOC). Employees are required to wash or sanitize their hands following any exchange of payment or documentation with those of the public. Employees should be especially mindful of touching their face prior to, during, and following money handling. Online payment methods will be encouraged via the City of Corcoran website and on-site using personal smart devices. Employees are encouraged to avoid on-site food preparation and sharing. In order to further protect yourself and others from the spread of the COVID -19 virus, the CDC guidelines and MDH guidance recommend the use of face coverings in public places or while at work in group settings (2 or more), except when in a private space such as an office or single occupant vehicle. These guidelines are in addition to all other social distancing guidelines that have been issued by the CDC and MDH related to the COVID-19 virus. Information regarding how to/when to wear a mask, donning/doffing face-coverings, and laundering of cloth face- coverings can be found in Appendix Item D. Employees are required to wear face-coverings when they leave their private workstation or are unable to social distance. (2) Social distancing Social distancing is being implemented in the workplace through the following controls: •Teleworking and remote computer access •Use of remote meeting technology while at work •Adjusting shifts o Flexible shifts o Split shifts o Staggered shifts o Reduced hours •Assigning employees to facilities, teams, or vehicles as feasible. The City has instructed employees to maintain six feet of distance between themselves. Shifts will remain staggered. Employee workstations have also been adjusted to accommodate social 4 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota distancing measures of a 6-foot minimum for those who were originally sharing workspaces. Employees are encouraged to utilize appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) which is available on sight. Plexiglass has been installed at the main reception counter to reduce exposure to respiratory droplets. A one-way pattern guided by stanchions will be implemented upon opening to assist with social distancing while visitors are being assisted with business. The stanchions will guide individuals through one side of the entrance, around the lobby , and up to the main reception counter. Occupancy will be limited by available space in the building. Individuals will be required to stand on floor markings, at least 6 feet apart, leading from the main entrance of City Hall to the main reception counter. Signage for social distancing will be installed for the public as City Hall is opened and can be seen in Appendix Item C. In an effort to limit face-to-face interactions, contact information for staff will remain updated on the City of Corcoran website. Employees are expected to limit car-pooling, ridesharing, etc. whenever possible. If it is necessary to share a vehicle, employees are required to wear some form of a mask throughout the duration of the trip when social distancing cannot be practiced. If an employee needs additional face-coverings, they are to contact their supervisor or the EOC. (3) Housekeeping – Cleaning, Disinfection, Decontamination, and Ventilation Regular housekeeping practices are being implemented, including routine cleaning and disinfecting of work surfaces, equipment, tools and machinery, and areas in the work environment, including restrooms and meeting rooms. Frequent cleaning and disinfecting will be conducted on high-touch surfaces, such as phones, keyboards, touch screens, controls, door handles, railings, copy machines, etc. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) criteria for use against SARS-CoV-2 will be used and interchanged as availability between products adjust . The sanitation schedule and checklist can be found as Appendix Item E . • Employees are expected to wipe common surfaces, such as copier/postage machine touch pads, light switches, handles, etc., before and after each use. • Employees are expected to wipe/disinfect their personal work areas upon arrival and prior to leaving each day they are in the office. This includes phone, keyboard, mouse, mouse pad, light switch, doorknobs, writing utensils, etc. • Employees using vehicles are expected to wipe/disinfect door handles (inside/outside, steering wheel, seat, gear shift, radio/climate control/other knobs, glove box entry, etc.) upon arrival and when finished using the vehicle. • Employees should avoid using other employees’ phones, desks, offices, or other work tools and equipment, when possible. If necessary, clean and disinfect them before and after each use. • Employees should inform their supervisor or the EOC when cleaning products are starting to get low. Beginning in phase 4, staff should disinfect the main reception counter following each interaction with members of the public. Plexiglass should be cleaned using a non-alcohol based 5 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota cleaner at the end of the day. Restrooms are readily available in City buildings and are stocked and maintained by City staff and weekly building cleaner. Additional cleaning will be done as needed and particularly should a staff member be diagnosed with COVID-19. Employees working from City vehicles are provided with approved cleaner in their vehicles to use as needed and between appointments. When additional cleaner/hand sanitizer is needed, employees should contact their supervisor or the EOC. Maintenance to the City’s heating, ventilation, and air conditioning unit will continue as usual with periodic filter changes and inspections by licensed professionals. The system will be modified as appropriate. (4) Drop-off, pick-up, and delivery practices and protocols A table will be set up to assist with social distancing and a centralized location to put U.S. Mail, packages, and other items to be dropped off for City Staff. This will help to limit face-to-face interactions between employees and the public. (5) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Some situations will require the need for employees to utilize disposable gloves. These situations will be determined department-by-department, task-by-task. Gloves will be provided and instructions on donning and doffing of the gloves can be found in Appendix Item F. [Source: CDC Coronavirus Disease 2019: Protect Yourself] Screening and Policies for Employees Exhibiting Signs and Symptoms of COVID-19 Employees have been informed of and encouraged to self-monitor for signs and symptoms of COVID-19. The following policies and procedures are being implemented to assess employees’ health status prior to entering the workplace and for employees to report when they are sick or experiencing symptoms. The City of Corcoran has implemented leave policies that promote employees staying at home when they are sick, when household members are sick, or when required by a health care provider to isolate or quarantine themselves or a member of their household. These policies include PTO, Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and unpaid leave of absence. In addition, in alignment with the Federal Government’s Families First Coronavirus Relief Act (can be found in as Appendix Items I and J), the City has implemented COVID-19 pay, which provide leaves related to COVID-19. 6 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota 1. Employees are expected to assess their health condition prior to leaving their home for work EACH DAY and before taking any temperature reducing drug. This includes self- assessment for exposure to others with COVID-19 symptoms/illness, exposure from travel, and COVID-19 symptoms they may be experiencing such as, but not limited to: o Fever or chills o Cough o Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing o Fatigue o Muscle or body aches o Headache o New loss of taste or smell o Sore throat o Congestion or runny nose o Nausea or vomiting o Diarrhea [Source: CDC Coronavirus Disease 2019: Symptoms] Employees are responsible for completing their own self-assessments, monitoring additional CDC guidelines and symptoms, and will not be required to submit assessment information to their supervisor or Human Resources. 2. If an employee answers yes to any of the symptoms provided by the CDC on their daily self-assessment(and cannot attribute it to another health condition), are sick, or have a sick family member at home with COVID-19 and are needing to self-quarantine in order to care for them, they are to report to their supervisor that they cannot report to work. Supervisors should notify Human Resources of COVID-19 exposures. If prior to a scheduled workday, the notification should be done through telephone call, email, or text message. 3. If symptoms appear during the workday (and cannot be attributed it to another health condition), an employee is required to wear a mask prior to moving from their workspace. The employee must immediately notify their supervisor and Human Resources that they must leave work. If an employee cannot immediately leave work, the employee should gather their things and self -isolate in the following area based on their work location: • City Hall: Employees should take the nearest exit from their workstations and walk outside the building to isolate at the picnic table on the north end of City Hall. In case of inclement weather, employees can isolate in th e coat closet area outside of the Community Room in City Hall. • Public Works: Employees should take the nearest exit from their workstation and walk outside the building to isolate under the lean-to in the back of the building. 7 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota In case of inclement weather, employees can isolate in the NE corner of the shop. •Police Department: Employees should take the nearest exit from their workstations and walk outside the building at isolate at the picnic table on the north end of City Hall. In case of inclement weather, employees can isolate in the squad car assigned to them. Depending on the circumstances, the City will wait as long as possible to allow for respiratory droplets to settle before cleaning and disinfecting impacted work areas, equipment, and other high-touch surfaces. The supervisor, or designee, will be responsible for disinfecting the impacted work areas, equipment, and other high-touch surfaces. 4.It is required to stay home if an employee is exhibiting symptoms of COVID-19 to prevent the spread of COVID-19 to other employees. Employees will be encouraged to contact their provider to see if COVID-19 testing is recommended. Accommodations for employees with underlying medical conditions or who have household members with underlying health conditions have been implemented. The City encourages staff with underlying health conditions or staff with household members that have underlying health conditions to contact Human Resources, as these situations will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to determine what accommodations may be appropriate. Employee Privacy The City of Corcoran has implemented a policy for informing employees if they have been exposed to a person with COVID-19 at their workplace and requires them to quarantine for 14 days. Supervisors will notify only those affected coworker(s) if they have been exposed to COVID-19. A discussion will take place as to whether social distancing has been followed which would reduce or may eliminate the likelihood of a true exposure. If social distancing and other hygiene etiquette has not been followed, then the exposed employee(s) may be required to self-quarantine for 14 days. The City of Corcoran has also implemented a procedure for informing employee(s) if they have been exposed to a person with COVID-19 at their workplace and requiring them to quarantine for the required amount of time. The City of Corcoran has a general duty to provide a safe workplace under federal OSHA laws. As part of that, the City of Corcoran will try to determine which, if any, employees were exposed to COVID-19 first through investigating the employee’s schedule and work location to determine with whom the employee interacted. The City may also request the employee provide a list of other employee(s) with whom they had close contact with during the last 14 days if they are confirmed to have COVID-19. Supervisors will notify only those affected coworker(s) if they have been exposed to COVID-19 as outlined below. 8 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota Notification will occur under these circumstances: 1.Employee is symptomatic of COVID-19 and/or has been asked to self-quarantine by a health care provider. 2.Employee has tested positive or been diagnosed with COVID-19 by health care provider. 3.Employee has been asked to self-quarantine due to someone in their household testing positive for COVID-19. Notification will NOT occur if: 1.Employee has been exposed to someone who has tested positive, or been diagnosed with COVID-19 (outside of their household) and does not have symptoms 2.Employee has been exposed to a potential positive test case of COVID-19. Supervisors should notify Human Resources of COVID-19 exposures. In addition, a policy has been implemented to protect the privacy of employees’ health status and health information. Several laws address the privacy of medical information. To assure compliance with these laws, and to respect employee privacy, supervisors MAY NOT reveal the name of the person who has reported COVID-19 symptoms or tested positive/negative with coworkers. Supervisors may share the employee name only with those who absolutely need to know. If an employee would like others to be made aware of their situation, they are responsible for sharing the information, not a supervisor or manager. Supervisors should not share this information under any circumstances, even if it is widely known among a work group(s). Thresholds for Re-Opening City Facilities The City of Corcoran has aligned its reopening plan with different milestones depicted in the Stay Safe Minnesota plan which can be found in Appendix Item K. Due to the ever-changing nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, the following phases should be considered guidelines rather than binding rules. The City will continue to take its guidance from the CDC and MDH when implementing safety precautions and reopening plans. The thresholds listed below may change as more information or guidance is provided. Many of the details in this Preparedness Plan are aligned with the different phases. Phase 0: Phase 0 is during a state-wide stay-at-home order. Facilities: City Hall, Public Works building, and Police Department are closed to the public. Additional procedures for cleaning are implemented. Playgrounds at the parks are closed. 9 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota Indoor and outdoor drinking fountains will be unavailable for use. Other park amenities remain open for general use, but no reservations will be accepted or honored. Employees: Essential and critical employees are working. Employees are required to work remotely as much possible. Administrative staff will be given specific days of the week that they can report to City Hall to complete items they are unable to do remotely. Shifts will remain staggered. Employee workstations will be adjusted to accommodate social distancing measures of a 6-foot minimum for those who were originally sharing workspaces. Those whose jobs cannot be performed remotely may be required to work in their normal setting during this period with additional precautions including, but not limited to, infection prevention measures, social distancing, and CDC and MDH guidelines to limit/prevent the spread of COVID- 19. Employees reporting to City facilities will also be required to take the additional precautions. Police officers will be encouraged to change in and out of their uniforms at the Police Department and the uniforms will be sent out to a cleaning company. Services: Critical and essential services continue. Public interaction will utilize telephone, email, US mail, and drop off in the City Hall vestibule or mailbox. Programs: Non-essential programs are cancelled (clean-up day, spring baseball, etc.). Meetings: All work-related meetings are conducted virtually. City Council and Commission meetings will be conducted virtually using a virtual/electronic platform. In accordance with City Code, Open House meetings shall be conducted virtually, and participation may be accepted through email, written correspondence, or phone. Any other public meeting that is not required under City Code or State Statute, shall be postponed. Phase 1: Phase 1 as outlined by the Stay Safe Minnesota order: Facilities: City Hall, Public Works building, and Police Department are closed to the public. Additional procedures for cleaning are in place. Indoor and outdoor drinking fountains will be unavailable for use. Playgrounds at the parks are open. Other park amenities remain open for general use, but no reservations, unless congregation above the social setting guidelines occurs. Employees: Essential and critical employees are working. Employees are required to work remotely as much possible. Administrative staff will continue to report to City Hall to complete items they are unable to do remotely on their pre-determined day(s). Shifts will remain staggered. Employee workstations have also been adjusted to accommodate social distancing measures of a 6-foot minimum for those who were originally sharing workspaces. Those whose jobs cannot be performed remotely may be required to work in their normal setting during this period with additional precautions including, but not limited to, infection prevention measures, social distancing, and CDC guidelines to limit/prevent the spread of COVID- 19. Employees reporting to City facilities will also be required to take the additional precautions. Police officers 10 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota will be encouraged to change in and out of their uniforms at the Police Department and the uniforms will be sent out to a cleaning company. Services: Critical and essential services continue. Alternate service delivery models continue, although there may be additional review or enhancement of service delivery. Programs: Non-essential programs are cancelled. Meetings: All work-related meetings are conducted virtually. City Council and Commission meetings will be conducted virtually using a virtual/electronic platform. In accordance with City Code, Open House meetings shall be conducted virtually, and participation may be accepted through email, written correspondence, or phone. Any other public meeting that is not required under City Code or State Statute, shall be postponed, or held virtually. Phase 2: Phase 2 as outlined by the Stay Safe Minnesota order: Facilities: City Hall, Public Works building, and Police Department are closed to the public. Additional procedures for cleaning are in place. Indoor and outdoor drinking fountains will be unavailable for use. Playgrounds at the parks are open. Other park amenities remain open for general use and reservations will be accepted/honored when following social setting guidelines. Preparedness plan is required for organized athletics. Employees: Essential and critical employees are working. Employees are required to work remotely as much possible. Administrative staff will continue to report to City Hall to complete items they are unable to do remotely on their pre-determined day(s). Shifts will remain staggered. Employee workstations have also been adjusted to accommodate social distancing measures of a 6-foot minimum for those who were originally sharing workspaces. Those whose jobs cannot be performed remotely may be required to work in their normal setting during this period with additional precautions including, but not limited to, infection prevention measures, social distancing, and CDC guidelines to limit/prevent the spread of COVID- 19. Employees reporting to City facilities will also be required to take the additional precautions. Police officers will be encouraged to change in and out of their uniforms at the Police Department and the uniforms will be sent out to a cleaning company. Services: Critical and essential services continue. Alternate service delivery models continue, although there may be additional review or enhancement of service delivery. Programs: Non-essential programs are cancelled. Meetings: All work-related meetings are conducted virtually. City Council and Commission meetings will be conducted virtually using a virtual/electronic platform. In accordance with City Code, Open House meetings shall be conducted virtually, and participation may be accepted through email, written correspondence, or phone. Any other public meeting that is not required under City Code or State Statute, shall be postponed, or held virtually. 11 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota Phase 3: Phase 3 as outlined by the Stay Safe Minnesota order: Facilities: City Hall, Public Works building, and Police Department are closed to the public. Additional procedures for cleaning are in place. Indoor and outdoor drinking fountains will be unavailable for use. Parks and all amenities are open, and reservations are accepted/honored when following social setting guidelines. Preparedness plan is required for organized athletics. Employees: Essential and critical employees are working. Employees are required to work remotely as much possible. Administrative staff will continue to report to City Hall to complete items they are unable to do remotely on their pre-determined day(s). Shifts will remain staggered. Employee workstations have also been adjusted to accommodate social distancing measures of a 6-foot minimum for those who were originally sharing workspaces. Those whose jobs cannot be performed remotely may be required to work in their normal setting during this period with additional precautions including, but not limited to, infection prevention measures, social distancing, and CDC guidelines to limit/prevent the spread of COVID- 19. Employees reporting to City facilities will also be required to take the additional precautions. Police officers will be encouraged to change in and out of their uniforms at the Police Department and the uniforms will be sent out to a cleaning company. Services: Critical and essential services continue. Alternate service delivery models continue, although there may be additional review or enhancement of service delivery . In-person services will begin in a limited fashion. Programs: Non-essential programs are cancelled. Meetings: All work-related meetings are conducted virtually. City Council and Commission meetings will be conducted virtually using a virtual/electronic platform. In accordance with City Code, Open House meetings shall be conducted virtually, and participation may be accepted through email, written correspondence, or phone. Any other public meeting that is not required under City Code or State Statute, shall be postponed or held virtually. Phase 4: Phase 4 has not yet been outlined by the Stay Safe Minnesota order: Facilities: City Hall is open to the public for services on a limited basis and in-line with CDC and MDH guidelines. Public Works building and Police Department are closed to the public. Additional procedures for cleaning are in place. Parks and all amenities are open, and reservations are accepted/honored when following social setting guidelines. Preparedness plan is required for organized athletics. Employees: Essential and Critical Employees are working. Employees will continue to work a mixture of remotely and in the workplace. Shifts will remain staggered. Employee workstations have also been adjusted to accommodate social distancing measures of a 6-foot minimum for 12 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota those who were originally sharing workspaces. Police officers will no longer be required to change into uniform at the Police Department and will be responsible for laundering their uniform. Services: Critical and essential services continue. In-person services resume with potential limitations at the beginning of this phase and may expand to normal operations. Programs: Some programming may resume with accommodations in-line with CDC and MDH guidance. Meetings: All work-related meetings are conducted virtually. City Council and Commission meetings will be conducted virtually using a virtual/electronic platform. In accordance with City Code, Open House meetings shall be conducted virtually, and participation may be accepted through email, written correspondence, or phone. Any other public meeting that is not required under City Code or State Statute, shall be postponed , or held virtually. Phase 5: Phase 5 has not yet been outlined by the Stay Safe Minnesota order: Facilities: City Hall is open to the public for services on a limited basis and in-line with CDC and MDH guidelines. Public Works building and Police Department are closed to the public. Additional procedures for cleaning are in place. Parks and all amenities are open, and reservations are accepted/honored when following social setting guidelines. Preparedness plan is required for organized athletics. Employees: Essential and Critical Employees are working. Employees will continue to work a mixture of remotely and in the workplace. Shifts will remain staggered. Employee workstations have also been adjusted to accommodate social distancing measures of a 6-foot minimum for those who were originally sharing workspaces. Police officers will no longer be encouraged to change into uniform at the Police Department and will be responsible for laundering their uniform. Services: Critical and essential services continue. In-person services resume with potential limitations at the beginning of this phase and may expand to normal operations. Programs: Some programming may resume with accommodations in-line with CDC and MDH guidance. Meetings: All work-related meetings are conducted virtually. City Council and Commission meetings will be conducted virtually using a virtual/electronic platform. In accordance with City Code, Open House meetings shall be conducted virtually, and participation may be accepted through email, written correspondence, or phone. Any other public meeting that is not required under City Code or State Statute, shall be postponed, or held virtually. 13 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota A plexiglass barrier will be put in place at the front counter, stanchions placed throughout the lobby to direct traffic, and various signage will be put out to inform individuals of social distancing and other guidelines that should be followed while in City Hall. Communications and Training The City has been communicating to employees the guidelines related to COVID-19 since the declaration of emergency and this Preparedness Plan codifies those communications. This COVID-19 Preparedness Plan was communicated via postings in the workplace, emailed to employees, and shared by supervisors during the week of June 29, 2020 to all and necessary training was provided. Additional communication and training will be ongoing via email, virtual meetings, or in-person meetings that meet social distancing and other relevant guidelines set forth by the CDC and MDH. Training will be provided to all workers who did not receive the initial training and prior to initial assignment or reassignment. Instructions will be communicated to all workers, including employees and temporary workers, on protections and protocols, including but not limited to: 1) Social distancing protocols and practices; 2) Drop-off, pick-up and drop-off; 3) Practices for hygiene and respiratory etiquette; 4) Recommendations or requirements regarding the use of face-coverings, and/or face-shields by workers employees, residents, and visitors. All employees, residents, and visitors will also be advised not to enter the workplace if they are experiencing symptoms or have contracted COVID -19. Managers and supervisors are to monitor how effective the program has been implemented by requesting feedback and concerns from employees as well as personal observation. All management and workers are to take an active role and collaborate in carrying out the various aspects of this plan, and update the protections, protocols, work-practices, and training as necessary. This COVID-19 Preparedness Plan has been certified by the City of Corcoran management, and the Plan was posted throughout the workplace and made readily available to employees on June 29, 2020. It will be updated as necessary by the City Administrator, Brad Martens. Authority to Change or Modify Circumstances related to COVID-19 are continuously changing and evolving. Supervisors are to monitor how effective the program has been implemented and carried out. Supervisors shall communicate any needs or adjustments to the City Administrator. The City Administrator will continue to monitor and evaluate operations and procedures and make necessary changes to ensure the safety of employees. The City Administrator is authorized to amend this plan as needed. 14 COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS PLAN City of Corcoran, Minnesota Certified by: _______________________________________________ __________________ Brad Martens Date City Administrator 15 Appendix A – Guidance for developing an Employer Preparedness Plan General Centers for Disease Controal and Prevention (CDC): Coronavirus (COVID-19) – www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019- nCoV Minnesota Department of Health (MDH): Coronavirus – www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus State of Minnesota: COVID-19 response – https://mn.gov/covid19 Businesses CDC: Resources for businesses and employers – www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019- ncov/community/organizations/businesses-employers.html CDC: General business frequently asked questions – www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/general- business-faq.html CDC: Building/business ventilation – www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/guidance-business- response.html MDH: Businesses and employers: COVID-19 – www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/businesses.html MDH: Health screening checklist – www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/facilityhlthscreen.pdf MDH: Materials for businesses and employers – www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/materials Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED): COVID-19 information and resources – https://mn.gov/deed/newscenter/covid/ Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (DLI): Updates related to COVID-19 – www.dli.mn.gov/updates Federal OSHA – www.osha.gov Handwashing MDH: Handwashing video translated into multiple languages – www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdQuPGVcceg Respiratory etiquette: Cover your cough or sneeze CDC: www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/prevention.html CDC: www.cdc.gov/healthywater/hygiene/etiquette/coughing_sneezing.html MDH: www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/prevention.html 16 Social distancing CDC: www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/guidance-business-response.html MDH: www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/businesses.html Housekeeping CDC: www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/disinfecting-building-facility.html CDC: www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/disinfecting-your-home.html CDC: www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/organizations/cleaning-disinfection.html Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/list-n-disinfectants-use-against- sars-cov-2 Employees exhibiting signs and symptoms of COVID-19 CDC: www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/steps-when-sick.html MDH: www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/basics.html MDH: www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/facilityhlthscreen.pdf MDH: www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/returntowork.pdf State of Minnesota – https://mn.gov/covid19/for-minnesotans/if-sick/get-tested/index.jsp Training CDC: www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/guidance-small-business.html Federal OSHA: www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3990.pdf MDH: www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/about.pdf 17 Stop Germs! Wash Your Hands. •After using the bathroom •Before, during, and after preparing food •Before eating food •Before and after caring for someone at home who is sick with vomiting or diarrhea •After changing diapers or cleaning up a child who has used the toilet •After blowing your nose, coughing, or sneezing •After touching an animal, animal feed, or animal waste •After handling pet food or pet treats •After touching garbage Wet your hands with clean, running water (warm or cold), turn off the tap, and apply soap. Lather your hands by rubbing them together with the soap. Be sure to lather the backs of your hands, between your fingers, and under your nails. Scrub your hands for at least 20 seconds. Need a timer? Hum the “Happy Birthday” song from beginning to end twice. Rinse hands well under clean, running water. Dry hands using a clean towel or air dry them. Keeping hands clean is one of the most important things we can do to stop the spread of germs and stay healthy. www.cdc.gov/handwashing This material was developed by CDC. The Life is Better with Clean Hands Campaign is made possible by a partnership between the CDC Foundation, GOJO, and Staples. HHS/CDC does not endorse commercial products, services, or companies.CS310027-A How? When? Appendix B - Hand Washing18 CS 317176-B 05/27/2020 Please wear a cloth face covering. cdc.gov/coronavirus Maintain a distance of 6 feet whenever possible. 6 ft Appendix C - Wearing Cloth Face-Coverings and Social Distancing19 How to Safely Wear and Take Off a Cloth Face Covering cdc.gov/coronavirus CS 316488A 06/10/2020 PHARMACYCLOTH BARRIERFor instructions on making a cloth face covering, see: Cloth face coverings are not surgical masks or N-95 respirators, both of which should be saved for health care workers and other medical first responders. WEAR YOUR FACE COVERING CORRECTLY USE THE FACE COVERING TO HELP PROTECT OTHERS FOLLOW EVERYDAY HEALTH HABITS TAKE OFF YOUR CLOTH FACE COVERING CAREFULLY, WHEN YOU’RE HOME •Wash your hands before putting on your face covering •Put it over your nose and mouth and secure it under your chin •Try to fit it snugly against the sides of your face •Make sure you can breathe easily •Do not place a mask on a child younger than 2 •Wear a face covering to help protect others in case you’re infected but don’t have symptoms •Keep the covering on your face the entire time you’re in public •Don’t put the covering around your neck or up on your forehead •Don’t touch the face covering, and, if you do, clean your hands •Stay at least 6 feet away from others •Avoid contact with people who are sick •Wash your hands often, with soap and water, for at least 20 seconds each time •Use hand sanitizer if soap and water are not available •Untie the strings behind your head or stretch the ear loops •Handle only by the ear loops or ties •Fold outside corners together •Place covering in the washing machine •Wash your hands with soap and water Accessible: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/diy-cloth-face-coverings.html Appendix D - How and When to Wear Cloth Face-Coverings20 Sanitation Schedule and Checklist City Hall (Administration Side) Surface/Equipment Being Disinfected Frequency of Disinfection Cleaning Agent to be Used Printer/Copier Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Postage Machine Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Fax Machine Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Workroom Counter Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Hole Puncher Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Door Handles (Main entrance, bathrooms, reception ½ door, door into the offices, PD handle and buttons, community room) Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Handicap Buttons at Entrance Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Keurig Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Microwave (Button and touchpad) Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Toaster Oven Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) “Breakroom” Counter Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Sink Handle (“breakroom”) Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Water Cooler Tabs Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Light Switches (Lobby – both sets, main office switches – both sets) Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Refrigerator Handle Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Main Reception Area Counter Prior to leaving for the day & as touched by visitors Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Vehicle (Door handles, shift stick, radio buttons, etc.) Upon changing of driver/passengers Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Drawers in the Workroom As touched Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Binders in the Workroom As touched Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Personal Workspace Items (Phone, mouse, keyboard, headset, speaker buttons, computer buttons, office door handles, light switches, etc.) Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) NOTES: *Employees should be disinfecting frequently and prior to touching communal office supplies. *The EOC or employee’s supervisor should be contacted when Zepynamic can is ½ full *If an area has dust or dirt, it must be cleaned first. Use Spirit II prior to Zepynamic. *Zepynamic and Spirit II will be placed at the main reception area counter. Zepynamic Directions: “Shake well before using… Clean soil deposits from surfaces to be treated. Remove protective cap, hold can upright and spray from a distance of 6 to 8 inches until area for treatment is thoroughly moistened. Allow surfaces to remain wet for a minimum of 10 minutes to ensure disinfection. Allow to air dry or remove excess solution.” Appendix E - Sanitation Schedule and Checklist21 Sanitation Schedule and Checklist Public Works Department Surface/Equipment Being Disinfected Frequency of Disinfection Cleaning Agent to be Used Printer/Copier Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Oven (Door handle, knobs, surface) Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Kitchen Counter Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Fax Machine Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Workroom Counter Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Door Handles (Entrances, bathrooms, breakroom, wash bay, etc.) Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Handicap Buttons Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Coffee Machine Buttons Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Microwave (Button and touchpad) Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Sink Handle (“break room”) Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Water Cooler Tabs Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Light Switches Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Refrigerator Handle Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Vehicle (Door handles, shift stick, radio buttons, etc.) Upon changing of driver/passengers Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Drawers in the Breakroom As touched Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) Personal Workspace Items (Phone, mouse, keyboard, headset, speaker buttons, computer buttons, office door handles, light switches, etc.) Prior to leaving for the day Zepynamic (Blue Spray Can) NOTES: *Employees should be disinfecting frequently and prior to touching communal office supplies. *The EOC or employee’s supervisor should be contacted when Zepynamic can is ½ full *If an area has dust or dirt, it must be cleaned first. Use Spirit II prior to Zepynamic. *Zepynamic and Spirit II will be placed at the main reception area counter. Zepynamic Directions: “Shake well before using… Clean soil deposits from surfaces to be treated. Remove protective cap, hold can upright and spray from a distance of 6 to 8 inches until area for treatment is thoroughly moistened. Allow surfaces to remain wet for a minimum of 10 minutes to ensure disinfection. Allow to air dry or remove excess solution.” 22 How to Remove Gloves To protect yourself, use the following steps to take off gloves CS 254759-AAdapted from Workers’ Compensation Board of B.C. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grasp the outside of one glove at the wrist. Do not touch your bare skin. Peel the glove away from your body, pulling it inside out. Hold the glove you just removed in your gloved hand. Peel off the second glove by putting your fingers inside the glove at the top of your wrist. Turn the second glove inside out while pulling it away from your body, leaving the first glove inside the second. Dispose of the gloves safely. Do not reuse the gloves. Clean your hands immediately after removing gloves. Appendix F - How to Remove Gloves23 Symptoms of Coronavirus (COVID-19) cdc.gov/coronavirus 317142-A May 20, 2020 10:44 AM Know the symptoms of COVID-19, which can include the following: *Seek medical care immediately if someone has emergency warning signs of COVID-19. •Trouble breathing •Persistent pain or pressure in the chest •New confusion •Inability to wake or stay awake •Bluish lips or face Cough Chills Muscle pain Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing* New loss of taste or smell Sore throat Symptoms can range from mild to severe illness, and appear 2-14 days after you are exposed to the virus that causes COVID-19. This list is not all possible symptoms. Please call your medical provider for any other symptoms that are severe or concerning to you. Fever Appendix G - COVID-19 Symptoms 24 What you should know about COVID-19 to protect yourself and others Know about COVID-19 •Coronavirus (COVID-19) is an illness caused by a virus that can spread from person to person. •The virus that causes COVID-19 is a new coronavirus that has spread throughout the world. •COVID-19 symptoms can range from mild (or no symptoms) to severe illness. Know how COVID-19 is spread •You can become infected by coming into close contact (about 6 feet or two arm lengths) with a person who has COVID-19. COVID-19 is primarily spread from person to person. •You can become infected from respiratory droplets when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or talks. •You may also be able to get it by touching a surface or object that has the virus on it, and then by touching your mouth, nose, or eyes. Protect yourself and others from COVID-19 •There is currently no vaccine to protect against COVID-19. The best way to protect yourself is to avoid being exposed to the virus that causes COVID-19. •Stay home as much as possible and avoid close contact with others. •Wear a cloth face covering that covers your nose and mouth in public settings. •Clean and disinfect frequently touched surfaces. •Wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, or use an alcohol- based hand sanitizer that contains at least 60% alcohol. Practice social distancing •Buy groceries and medicine, go to the doctor, and complete banking activities online when possible. •If you must go in person, stay at least 6 feet away from others and disinfect items you must touch. •Get deliveries and takeout, and limit in-person contact as much as possible. Prevent the spread of COVID-19 if you are sick •Stay home if you are sick, except to get medical care. •Avoid public transportation, ride-sharing, or taxis. •Separate yourself from other people and pets in your home. •There is no specific treatment for COVID-19, but you can seek medical care to help relieve your symptoms. •If you need medical attention, call ahead. Know your risk for severe illness •Everyone is at risk of getting COVID-19. •Older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions may be at higher risk for more severe illness. milk cdc.gov/coronavirus CS 314937A 06/01/2020 Appendix H - Preventative Measures25 City of Corcoran COVID-19 Pay Guidelines – Subject to change at any time Effective April 2, 2020, full-time staff who are required to be off work due to COVID-19, are authorized to use up to 80 total hours of COVID-19 Pay. Part-time staff are authorized to receive COVID-19 pay for his or her average number of work hours in a two-week period. The total number of hours given will be established at the time of leave. The information provided here is based on information available at this time; if at some point in the future we receive further guidance in conflict with this information, we will make appropriate adjustments at that time COVID-19 Pay is based upon an employee's base pay rate. COVID-19 Pay does not include overtime, supplemental pay, and/or other additional pay unless authorized by law and may not be compounded, stacked, or pyramided. Below are examples of how employees would be treated under various scenarios. Description Full-time Part-time Temp/Seasonal Employee is sick - not related to COVID-19 1) Comp-time 2) PTO 3) Extended Leave Bank Unpaid Unpaid Employee with confirmed or suspected COVID-19, as determined by employee's health care provider. If you are not able to secure a medical certification from your medical provider, contact your supervisor. COVID-19 Pay until exhausted followed by employee use of accrued Comp-time, PTO, and extended leave. Medical certification may be required COVID-19 pay for his or her average number of work hours in a two-week period. Medical certification may be required. This total number is to be established at time of leave and does not restart with an additional leave. COVID-19 pay for his or her average number of work hours in a two-week period. Medical certification may be required. This total number is to be established at time of leave and does not restart with an additional leave. Confirmed COVID-19 contracted from exposure at work. Workers' Comp supplemented with Injured On Duty or COVID-19 pay, as applicable. Subject to approval by Work Comp provider. Workers' Comp supplemented with COVID-19 pay. Subject to approval by Work Comp provider. Workers' Comp supplemented with COVID-19 pay. Subject to approval by Work Comp provider. Employee must leave work to care for a sick family member(s) - not related to COVID-19 1) Comp-time 2) PTO 3) Extended Leave Bank Unpaid Unpaid Employee must leave work to care for a family member(s) with confirmed or suspected COVID-19, as determined by a licensed health care provider. If you are not able to secure a medical certification from your medical provider, contact your supervisor. COVID-19 Pay until exhausted followed by employee use of accrued Comp-time, PTO, and extended leave. Medical certification may be required COVID-19 pay for his or her average number of work hours in a two-week period. Medical certification may be required. This total number is to be established at time of leave and does not restart with an additional leave. COVID-19 pay for his or her average number of work hours in a two-week period. Medical certification may be required. This total number is to be established at time of leave and does not restart with an additional leave.. Appendix I - City of Corcoran COVID-19 Pay - FFCRA 26 Description Full-time Part-time Temp/Seasonal Extended FMLA Leave. Employee unable to work because they need to care for a son or daughter under 18 years of age whose school or place of care has been closed. Employer will attempt to find work to complete remotely if possible; if not possible, the first 10 days employee may choose to use PTO or other paid or unpaid leave or may elect to use the COVID-19 Pay described above , following 10 weeks paid at two-thirds the regular rate of pay for the number of hours the employee would otherwise be normally scheduled to work. The 10 weeks of pay is capped at $200 per day ($10,000 in the aggregate). IF employed at least 30 days: First 10 days paid in accordance with COVID-19 Pay described above; following 10 weeks paid at two-thirds the regular rate of pay for the number of hours the employee would otherwise be normally scheduled to work. The 10 weeks of pay is capped at $200 per day ($10,000 in the aggregate). If employed at least 30 days: First 10 days paid in accordance with COVID-19 Pay described above; following 10 weeks paid at two-thirds the regular rate of pay for the number of hours the employee would otherwise be normally scheduled to work. The 10 weeks of pay is capped at $200 per day ($10,000 in the aggregate). Negative Leave Balances: Employees with insufficient paid leave may request authorization to allow leave balances to become negative. The City Administrator will review requests on a case by case basis. Carryover: COVID-19 Pay shall not carry over from one year to the next. Ability to send an employee home Supervisors have the authority to send employees home who are sick and may require a note from a medical provider in order to return. 27 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS PAID SICK LEAVE AND EXPANDED FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE UNDER THE FAMILIES FIRST CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE ACT WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WH1422 REV 03/20 For additional information or to file a complaint: 1-866-487-9243 TTY: 1-877-889-5627 dol.gov/agencies/whd 1.is subject to a Federal, State, or local quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19; 2.has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine related to COVID-19; 3.is experiencing COVID-19 symptoms and is seeking a medical diagnosis; 4.is caring for an individual subject to an order described in (1) or self-quarantine as described in (2); ►ENFORCEMENT The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) has the authority to investigate and enforce compliance with the FFCRA. Employers may not discharge, discipline, or otherwise discriminate against any employee who lawfully takes paid sick leave or expanded family and medical leave under the FFCRA, files a complaint, or institutes a proceeding under or related to this Act. Employers in violation of the provisions of the FFCRA will be subject to penalties and enforcement by WHD. 5.is caring for his or her child whose school or place of care is closed (or child care provider is unavailable) due to COVID-19 related reasons; or 6.is experiencing any other substantially-similar condition specified by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA or Act) requires certain employers to provide their employees with paid sick leave and expanded family and medical leave for specified reasons related to COVID-19. These provisions will apply from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. ►PAID LEAVE ENTITLEMENTS Generally, employers covered under the Act must provide employees: Up to two weeks (80 hours, or a part-time employee’s two-week equivalent) of paid sick leave based on the higher of their regular rate of pay, or the applicable state or Federal minimum wage, paid at: • 100% for qualifying reasons #1-3 below, up to $511 daily and $5,110 total; •2/3 for qualifying reasons #4 and 6 below, up to $200 daily and $2,000 total; and •Up to 12 weeks of paid sick leave and expanded family and medical leave paid at 2/3 for qualifying reason #5 below for up to $200 daily and $12,000 total. A part-time employee is eligible for leave for the number of hours that the employee is normally scheduled to work over that period. ►ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES In general, employees of private sector employers with fewer than 500 employees, and certain public sector employers, are eligible for up to two weeks of fully or partially paid sick leave for COVID-19 related reasons (see below). Employees who have been employed for at least 30 days prior to their leave request may be eligible for up to an additional 10 weeks of partially paid expanded family and medical leave for reason #5 below. ►QUALIFYING REASONS FOR LEAVE RELATED TO COVID-19 An employee is entitled to take leave related to COVID-19 if the employee is unable to work, including unable to telework, because the employee: Appendix J - Families First Coronavirus Response Act28 Last updated 6/9/2020 9:49 a.m. Appendix K - Stay Safe Minnesota Plan 29 30 31 32 33 34 Work Guidelines for COVID-19 Pandemic – Administration The following guidelines have been put in place in order to determine what work functions are able to be continued for the Administration Department Basic Preventative Measures •Employees must stay at home if they are sick •Employees must frequently and thoroughly wash their hands or use hand sanitizer •Employees must avoid touching their eyes, nose, or mouth with unwashed hands •Employees must replace face to face meetings with virtual communications whenever feasible •Employees have been assigned their own vehicles to travel to and from work assignments •Employees must not use other employees’ phones, desks, officers when possible •Employees must discontinue communal lunches and breaks unless they can accommodate social distancing (6 feet minimum separation) •Tools and equipment must be disinfected after use as possible •Non-essential travel is discontinued Recommended Best Management Practices •Employees assigned individual work assignments separate from each other •Employees assigned individual work areas separate from each other •Off-site, individual work, and staggered work schedules is recommended whenever feasible •Masks should be worn when social distancing guidelines cannot be met In order to assist in the determination of which work tasks should be continued during the pandemic, the following guidance has been given. All work assigned must meet the following guidelines: 1.Accommodate social distancing, 6 feet of separation between individuals 2.Appropriate personal, protective equipment (PPE) is available; use of PPE must not result in a reduction in PPE needed for essential functions (consult with EOC) 3.Equipment used can be sanitized appropriately in between uses It is recognized that many of the functions of Administration are essential in nature. These functions include payroll, utility billing, processing applications, answering phone calls and emails from the public, emergency response assistance, Council Packets, and more. Any essential functions that must be completed but cannot meet the above guidelines must be approved by the Administrative Services Director or City Administrator. If work available cannot meet the guidelines above, the Administrative Services Director will then decide whether or not to send staff home until work available can meet the necessary guidelines. Appendix L - Work Guidelines for COVID-19: Administration35 Work Guidelines for COVID-19 Pandemic – Public Works The following guidelines have been put in place in order to determine what work functions are able to be continued for the Public Works Department Basic Preventative Measures •Employees must stay at home if they are sick •Employees must frequently and thoroughly wash their hands or use hand sanitizer •Employees must avoid touching their eyes, nose, or mouth with unwashed hands •Employees must replace face to face meetings with virtual communicati ons whenever feasible •Employees have been assigned their own vehicles to travel to and from work assignments •Employees must not use other employees’ phones, desks, officers when possible •Employees must discontinue communal lunches and breaks unless they can accommodate social distancing (6 feet minimum separation) •Tools and equipment must be disinfected after use as possible •Non-essential travel is discontinued Recommended Best Management Practices •Employees assigned individual work assignments separate from each other •Employees assigned individual locker/storage areas separate from each other •Off-site, individual work, and staggered work schedules is recommended whenever feasible In order to assist in the determination of which work tasks should be continued during the pandemic, the following guidance has been given. All non-essential work assigned must meet the following guidelines: 1.Accommodate social distancing, 6 feet of separation between individuals 2.Appropriate personal, protective equipment (PPE) is available; use of PPE must not result in a reduction in PPE needed for essential functions (consult with EOC) 3.Equipment used can be sanitized appropriately in between uses It is recognized that many of the functions of Public Works are essential in nature. These functions include road maintenance, utility locates, lift station checks, facility maintenance, equipment maintenance, emergency response assistance, and more. These functions should accommodate the above guidance whenever feasible. If no essential functions are required and non-essential work available cannot meet the guidelines above, the Public Works Superintendent must communicate that information with the Public Works Director. The Public Works Director will then decide whether or not to send staff home until essential work is necessary or as non-essential work can meet the necessary guidelines. Appendix M - Work Guidelines for COVID-19: Public Works36 COVID -19 March 31, 2020 Decontamination procedure for COVID-19 virus exposure. To minimize the risk of contamination in the squads, inside the PD and at your homes - If you respond to a call and suspect your uniform has been exposed to the COVID-19 virus, follow these steps: Do not go into the PD before following these steps. 1. Immediately after the call return to PD and leave your squad outside the garage. Inside the garage there is a supply of gloves, cleaning supplies, garbage bags, and Tyvek suits. 2. Put on a fresh pair of gloves. Place your contaminated clothing in the supplied bags. Put on a new Tyvek suit or the clothing you carry in your pursuit bag. For the next weeks we recommend carrying small bag containing shorts/sweats and a shirt in a bag during your shift. 3. Use hand sanitizer/hand wipes, put on a fresh gloves and use the Clorox wipes or bleach solution to wipe down your duty belt/gear and boots. 4. Clean your squad by spraying Zepynamic / Bleach Solution on the driver’s seat or any other cloth material that needs to be disinfected. Zepynamic kills TB, SARS Coronavirus, and many moreviruses within 3 minutes. Spray the inside of squad with Zepynamic and let air dry for at least ten minutes. 5. Shower in the locker room and get a clean uniform. For the next few weeks have a spare uniform in your locker. 6. Wash contaminated clothing. It can washed at Public Works, or brought home. Wash on warmest appropriate setting and completely dry. Items should be laundered per the manufacturer’s instructions and using the warmest possible appropriate setting. Per CDC guidance you can wash soiled laundry from an ill person with other people’s garments, as washing clothes in a machine with detergent will kill the virus. Appendix N - COVID-19 Police Department Decon37 Corcoran COVID-19 Phased Response and Protocols Phase 1: Prevention ● Handwashing Campaign ●Before you start your shift, you are responsible to wipe down all shared workstations with Clorox wipes or Zepynamic Spray (Blue can). All surfaces, phones, keyboards, doorknobs, and flat surfaces should be cleaned at the beginning of each shift. This includes all door handles, including all entry ways into the PD. Each workstation should also be provided hand sanitizer. ●CPD has identified essential staff and created a minimum staffing level ● Directives for personnel to stay home if sick - Contact Lt. Burns and coordinate coverage ● Sanitizing resources order: ○Zepynamic Sprays are in garage for vehicles ○Zepynamic Sprays are placed at various locations around the department, including dispatch, squad room, and CID. These stations should be cleaned and wiped down daily. ○ Nitrile gloves have been ordered and distributed ● N95 masks ○ Our stocked masks are for Officer/Staff use ○ They are one-time use masks that should be disposed of after perceived exposure. Only use when necessary. ●Review limited staffing plan with Lakes Area Emergency Management Group Phase 2: Increasing Cases of COVID-19 in Metro (Containment) ● Officers no longer being dispatched on medical calls (COVID-19 related) ○ Avoiding flu-like symptoms and respiratory infections ● Use 6 ft distance at scenes ● Inventory current remote working resources ○ Laptops for investigators, admin positions, etc. ○CPD getting familiar with Go-To meetings and our conference call system. Confirm operator awareness and knowledge of remote meeting capabilities. ● Create page-out phone list for CPD and test ● Checked and verified phone communication and technology operability ●Implement limited staffing plan with Lakes Area Emergency Management Group ●Handle lobby calls through glass window Phase 3: Wide Spread Cases (Mitigation) ●CPD/City daily update meetings as necessary, using Go-To Meetings ●CPD will continue to coordinate as needed with HCEM and MDH ●Continue limited staffing plan with Lakes Area Emergency Management Group ● Single agency response protocol with first responders ● In the event of possible exposure Appendix O - COVID-19 Phased Release and Protocols38 Corcoran COVID-19 Phased Response and Protocols ○ Wash your hands and exposed areas, return to CPD, clean your uniform, and vehicle ○ Use isolation strategy ●Use ventilation with transports Patrol ● Change to 12-hour shift if necessary for Patrol officers with Lake Area EM Staffing Plan ● Rotate squad cars and frequently sanitize ● Low priority calls are handled in the lobby or by phone ● Place officers who are sick on IOD for quarantine periods On-Going Issues ● We need to communicate a limited response clearly to the community. ● Recovery supplies available for limited options during mitigation ● Spray Clorox or Zepynamic Spray for cleaning and suspected exposure are being ordered ● Avoid transporting to NMMC for care, but if necessary call ahead 39 Date: March 16, 2020 To: Corcoran Staff Members From: Brad Martens, City Administrator Subject: Pandemic Guidelines for Corcoran Staff This weekend was unprecedented and impactful as the COVID-19 virus continues to expand throughout the country including Minnesota. It is important that Corcoran is taking the necessary steps to prepare for a larger outbreak to take place in Minnesota which could result in potential cutbacks to government services. The following are guidelines for Corcoran employees to follow related to the COVID-19 virus. •What to do if you feel ill: At the first sign of illness, you should leave work immediately to avoid exposing coworkers and you should stay home until you are completely recovered, or the infectiousness has been ruled out. •What to do if you’ve been exposed to the virus: If you have been in contact with someone who is suspected of having the virus, you should report this information to your supervisor immediately. •Supervisory authority to send ill employees home: Supervisors have the authority to require an ill employee to leave the workplace, as a safety consideration for the health of other employees. While supervisors should not make judgments about a medical diagnosis, they may rely on symptoms to make a determination to send an employee home. (Coronavirus symptoms are respiratory in nature and may include fever, cough and shortness of breath.) •When you can return to work: You may be required by your supervisor to produce a physician’s note stating that you may safely return to work, depending upon the availability of medical providers and the severity of the outbreak. •What will happen if your accrued leave is exhausted: Employees are advised to review the City’s leave policies beginning on page 27 of the employee handbook. If your accrued leave runs out or is insufficient, you will first be required to use all available accrued leave (PTO, Sick Leave, Vacation, Floating Holiday, etc.), compensatory time and applicable disability insurance. If you do not have any paid leave available through the City’s paid leave programs, you will be placed on approved unpaid leave status. We are considering additional changes or modifications to policy in response to this unique situation. Appendix P - Pandemic Guidelines for Corcoran Staff40 •What will happen with your health insurance: If you are eventually forced to use unpaid leave due to a pandemic related illness or complication thereof, the City will continue its share of all insurance benefits for a maximum of twelve weeks. •Working remotely from home: With approval from the City Administrator, certain employees may be able to work remotely if their job duties and personal IT infrastructure allows the employee to work efficiently and securely from their home. •What will happen with regard to employee travel: Work-related travel other than necessary operations must be approved by your supervisor. We ask staff to leverage technology when possible to meet remotely. •Employees that are traveling: Employees should inform their supervisors of any recent or upcoming travel plans. •How the City will communicate with employees: E-mail will likely be our primary means of contact, but please make sure your supervisor has up to date contact information for you (e.g., cell phone number). Mandatory Preventive Measures: •Use of social distancing methods, maintain distance from those who are ill and from all other people in the workplace as possible. •Employees are asked to attend meetings virtually. Meetings with the public or staff are encouraged to be held remotely or with social distancing. •Avoid touching your eyes, nose and mouth. •Stay home when you are sick. •Discontinuing handshaking as a greeting. •Implement extended hand-washing method (at least 20 seconds with soap and water) after using the restroom, before eating and after blowing your nose, coughing or sneezing. •Use hand sanitizer (at least 60% alcohol) as needed or when soap and water are not available. •Use disinfectants to wipe down work surfaces at least twice per day or when a possible contamination has occurred. •Use cough and sneeze etiquette and dispose of tissues in trash cans. ADDITIONAL HELPFUL LINKS https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/situation.html https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nCoV/index.html Please note that these procedures are being put in place to protect our employees and that they are subject to change depending on changing conditions with COVID-19. All employees are asked to comply with these procedures and to remain informed of any changing circumstances. Future information will be provided to staff members through the City’s e-mail system or your department head or supervisor. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact one of the Leadership Team members: Brad Martens, City Administrator: bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us or 763-400-7030 Matt Gottschalk, Director of Public Safety: mgottschalk@ci.corcoran.mn.us or 763-400-7001 Jessica Beise, Administrative Services Director: jbeise@ci.corcoran.mn.us or 763-400-7029 Kevin Mattson, Public Works Director: kmattson@ci.corcoran.mn.us 763-400-7028 41 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10b. Council Meeting: June 25, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: City Council Resignation; Declaration of a Vacancy Action Required: Approval Summary: Councilmember Brian Dejewski has issued a resignation notice to the City Council. The notice was received on May 30, 2020 and was effective the end of June 2020. Councilmember Dejewski’s term was set to expire December 31, 2020. The resignation notice is attached to this report as well as an article on vacancie s on a statutory city council. While Corcoran is a Charter City, the Charter is silent on the issue which determines statute is followed. Staff has consulted with the City Attorney regarding the process when a City Council resignation takes place which is the following: 1. Accept the resignation. 2. Declare a vacancy. 3. Fill the vacancy. Minnesota Statue 412.02 subdivision 2a is applicable: Vacancy. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 2b, a vacancy in an office shall be filled by council appointment until an election is held as provided in this subdivision. In case of a tie vote in the council, the mayor shall make the appointment. If the vacancy occurs before the first day to file affidavits of candidacy for the next regular city election and more than two years remain in the unexpired term, a special election shall be held at or before the next regular city election and the appointed person shall serve until the qualification of a successor elected at a special election to fill the unexpired portion of the term. If the vacancy occurs on or after the first day to file affidavits of candidacy for the regular city election or when less than two years remain in the unexpired term, there need not be a special election to fill the vacancy and the appointed person shall serve until the qualification of a successor. The council must specify by ordinance under what circumstances it will hold a special election to fill a vacancy other than a special election held at the same time as the regular city election. Due the timing of the vacancy taking place after the filing period for the election has closed, and the term remaining being less than two years, the City Council may appoint a successor for the remainder of the unexpired term which ends December 31, 2020. There is no specific procedure for the appointment process with the only requirement being that the person appointed be qualified to serve. The process is entirely up to the Page 2 discretion of the City Council however the attached guidance states “…a City must make its best effort to appoint a person to fill a council vacancy and cannot choose to leave a council position vacant until the term expires.” In January of this year the City Council held an application process to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Mike Keefe. Through that process, three individuals applied and ultimately Tom Anderson was appointed. The Council could review that list, begin a new process, or appoint someone else. Financial/Budget: Not applicable Options: 1. Accept the resignation of Councilmember Brian Dejewski effective June 30, 2020, declare a vacancy, and discuss the preferred process for appointing a qualified successor. Recommendation: Accept the resignation of Councilmember Brian Dejewski effective June 30, 2020, declare a vacancy, and discuss the preferred process for appointing a qualified successor. Council Action: Accept the resignation of Councilmember Brian Dejewski effective June 30, 2020, declare a vacancy, and discuss the preferred process for appointing a qualified successor. Attachments: 1. Resignation – Brian Dejewski 2. Vacancies on a Statutory City Council From:Brian Dejewski To:Brad Martens; Ron Thomas; Jonathan Bottema; Alan Schultz; Tom Anderson Cc:Matt Gottschalk; Jessica Beise Subject:Resignation Date:Saturday, May 30, 2020 1:41:26 PM Dear Mr. Mayor, Council Members, and City Administrator, I am writing to inform you that I will no longer be able to serve as a City Council Member due to a change of residence effective the end of June, 2020. Our family has decided to move back to Maple Grove for the advancement of our organization as well as the well being of our family. Serving on the council for these past 3 1/2 years has been an honor and a pleasure. I have learned more than I ever would have imagined and have enjoyed contributing to the city and my local community through council activities, the crime drug and safety task force, and the fire services subcommittee. We have a very capable and dedicated staff, public works, and public safety who do their jobs well and a council that is highly invested in what is best for the city. That leaves me hopeful that the future for Corcoran is a bright one. We will remain active in the city through our ongoing programs at Maple Hill Estates, which will continue as they do today. Feel free to contact me anytime and I wish you all the best. Thank you! Brian 612-716-0885 Cell brian@mobilehopemn.org Brian Dejewski Corcoran City Council www.ci.corcoran.mn.us bdejewski@ci.corcoran.mn.us M i n n e s o t a C i t i e s 1 9oCt o b e r 2 0 0 0 O By Susan Naughton D I D Y O U K N O W ? Vacancies on a Statutory City Council ne of your councilmembers sub- mits a written resignation. What do you do? This article answers some of the most frequently asked questions about vacancies on a statutory city council. State law provides that a council vacancy “shall be filled by council appointment” until a special election, if required, can be held (Minn. Stat. § 412.02, subd. 2a). The language of the state law is mandatory. As a result, a city must make its best effort to appoint a person to fill a council vacancy and cannot choose to leave a council position vacant until the term expires. State law does not require a council vacancy to be advertised. However, it is a good practice to provide some notice to the public before the council makes an appointment. This allows interested persons an opportunity to request consideration. Generally, a person must be a United States citizen, a resident of the city, and at least 21 years old to be eligible for appointment to fill a council vacancy. A city employee can be considered for appointment. However, if a city employee is appointed, it is possible that the two city positions may be incompatible. If a city employee is appointed to an incompatible office, he or she must resign from the other city position. A councilmember can be con- sidered for appointment to fill a council vacancy in the position of mayor as long as the councilmember being considered does not participate in the appointment vote. State law provides that the council makes the appointment to fill a vacancy, except in the case of a tie vote, when the mayor makes the appointment. That means all members of the council, including the mayor, can vote on the appointment. However, the council- member who submitted a written resignation should not participate in the appointment vote. As a practical matter, it may be useful to determine who the candidates for appointment are before voting takes place. As long as at least a quorum of the council is present, a majority vote of those present vacancy occurs before the first day to file as a candidate for the next regular city election and more than two years remain in the unexpired term, the city must hold a special election to fill the council vacancy at or before the next regular city election and the person elected will serve out the remainder of the unexpired term. If the council chooses to hold a special election to fill a vacancy at a time other than at the regular city election, it first must adopt an ordinance specifying the circum- stances under which such an election will be held. If a special election to fill a coun- cil vacancy is held at the same time as the regular city election, the names of the candidates for the council vacancy should be placed on the election ballot under a separate heading indicating it is a special election. The election ballot should state the date the term expires and any other information necessary to distinguish the office. The published and posted election notices should include references to the special elec- tion to fill the council vacancy. Finally, state law provides that the terms of elected city officials begin on the first Monday in January following the election. However, the Minnesota Attorney General has advised that a person elected to fill a council vacancy in a statutory city is eligible to take an oath and assume office any time after receiving an election certificate. Susan Naughton is research attorney with the League of Minnesota Cities. is sufficient to make the appointment. State law does not place any limitation on a mayor’s ability to make an ap- pointment in the case of a tie vote. As a result, a mayor can appoint any quali- fied person willing to fill the vacancy even if that person was not the subject of the original appointment vote. When is a city also required to hold a special election to fill a council vacancy? The answer depends on whether filing has opened for the next regular city election and how long is left in the unexpired portion of the term at the time of the vacancy. If the vacancy occurs on or after the first day to file as a candidate for the next regular city election or if less than two years remain in the unexpired term, the city does not need to hold a special election and the appointed person can serve out the remainder of the unexpired term. If the “The language of the state law is mandatory. As a result, a city must make its best effort to appoint a person to fill a council vacancy and cannot choose to leave a council position vacant until the term expires.” Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 MEMORANDUM 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net DATE June 15, 2020 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications Projects/Comments in blue italics are new Project marked with an * have moved from active to approved The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1.Corcoran Self Storage PUD Amendment (city file no. 20-009). The applicant is requesting an amendment to the phasing plan for the project. Staff is currently reviewing the application for completeness, but it appears that the request may be administratively approved. The application is incomplete pending additional information from the applicant. 2.Corcoran Crossroads Administrative Permit and Variances at 7625 County Road 116 (city file 20-014). The new owner of Corcoran Crossroads has applied for an administrative permit for expansion of the existing legal, non-conforming canopy structure and sign variances. Staff will review the application and if it complies with the ordinance, it may be administratively approved. The application for the variances is scheduled for the July 2nd meeting and City Council will review on July 23rd. 3.Karineimi Addition Preliminary Plat at 6780 Rolling Hills Road and 6855 Willow Drive (PID 33- 119-23-22-0004 and 33-119-23-21-0001) (City file 20-0016). The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat to create four lots from the newly created Lot 1, Block 1, Rolling Hills Acres and the adjacent 40 acres to the east. The 40-acre parcel have four development rights which will be used for the subdivision. The application reviewed at a public hearing at the Planning Commission on June 4th and City action is expected on June 25th. 4.Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for “Tavera” at the property at the northwest corner of Hackamore Road and County Road 116 (PID 35-119-23-44-0001, 35-119-23-11-0001, 35-119-23-12-0002, 35-119-23-41- 0001 and 35-119-23-43-0001) (City File 20-017). The applicant has submitted an application for development of 549 homes on the 273.57-acre site. The Council reviewed an EAW and Concept plan for the site earlier this year. The project includes a mix of single-family, villa, twinhome and townhome units. The phasing plan shows development in 8 phases. The application was reviewed by the Parks and Trails Commission review on May 21st and a public hearing was held at the Planning Commission on June 4th. City Council action is expected on June 25th. 5.Conditional Use Permit and Variance for the Tom Spanier property located at 10580 Cain Road (PID 02-119-23-23-004) (city file no. 20-019) (City File 20-019). The applicant has requested approval of a conditional use permit and variance for an accessory building. This project was reviewed and approved in 2015 and was never built. The approvals expired after one year on November 23, 2016. The applicant is now ready to move forward with the project and is requesting approval again with no changes. The application was reviewed at a public hearing at the Planning Commission on June 4th and City Council action is expected on June 25th. Agenda Item 11a. MEMORANDUM 2 6. Sign Variance for the Marathon/Tom Thumb at 9350 County Road (PID 07-119-23-43-0004) (City File 20-020). The applicant has submitted a variance application to allow the number of and square footage of freestanding and wall signage to exceed what is allowed by ordinance. The application is scheduled for review at the Planning Commission on July 2nd and City Council action on July 23rd. 7. Encroachment agreement on 70th Avenue to provide access to PID 26-119-23-33-0001 (city file 20-021). The property owner is planning to construct a new home on this vacant parcel. The existing 70th Avenue right-of-way extends to the property line but the road improvements stop short. The property owner will need an encroachment agreement to build a private driveway from the existing cul de sac over the unimproved right-of-way to the property line. Once the request is complete, it would be scheduled for Council approval. 8. Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance for Nelson International at 10409 CR 101 (PID 01-119-23-41-0001) (city file no. 20-022). The Council reviewed a concept plan for this site in January. The project is a new 35,000 sq. ft. building for truck sales and service. The application is currently incomplete as the City completes feasibility studies for the planned infrastructure. The items will be scheduled for Planning Commission and Council review once it is complete. This item is tentatively planned for the August meetings. 9. Eagle Brook Church Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Plat for the Property located at 7015 20th Avenue (PID 36-119-23-44-0008, 36-119-23-44-0010, 36-119-23-44-0009, 36- 119-23-44-0013, 36-119-23-44-0014) (city file no. 20-023). The applicant is requesting approval to combine the existing parcels into one lot for a 70,000 square foot church and one outlot for future development. The application is scheduled for a public hearing at the July 2nd Planning Commission meeting and City Council action on July 23rd. 10. Final PUD Development Plan, Final Plat and Easement Vacation for “Bellwether 5th Addition” (Outlot A, Bellwether 4th Addition) (city file no. 20-024). Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC has submitted a request for approval of a Final Plat and Final PUD plan application for “Bellwether 5th Addition”, a residential development of 46 new single-family homes and one outlot on 18.43 acres of property. The application includes vacation of the existing drainage and utility easement over the outlot. The application is scheduled for Parks and Trails Commission review on June 18th, Planning Commission review on July 2nd and Council action on July 23rd. Also, there are several projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out: 1. Corcoran Business Park (City file 06-005). The City Council granted a one-year extension to the final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and is still working to close out this project. Staff has spoken to the applicant and will schedule a meeting when more information is available on the Loretto sewer project. 2. Hope Ministries Conditional Use Permit for Cemetery and Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easement at 19951 Oswald Farm Road (City file 12-002). Hope Ministries submitted a request for a conditional use permit to allow a cemetery west of the existing church. The application was approved by the City Council on March 22nd and site work had begun. The letter of credit for site improvements has been released, but we are holding the escrow pending completion of the approved landscaping. The applicant has indicated that they are considering a site plan amendment application to modify the approved plans. Staff met again with Pastor Brian Lother in July 2017 to discuss the outstanding issues and future expansion plans on the property. 3. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning for Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14-027). The City Council approved the request on December 11, 2014 and granted the applicant 2 years to apply for the final plat and final PUD development plan. Peachtree Partners did not buy the property, but a different developer could still proceed with the approved plan. Several extensions have been approved. The landowner is requesting another extension to the preliminary plat approval, which was previously granted extensions that expire in February. M/I Homes is proposing to take over the project with a few amendments to the proposed plan. Council reviewed the request at the February 27th meeting. MEMORANDUM 3 4. Commercial Door Addition at 7670 Commerce Street (City file 15-010). The City received an application for approval of a building addition, which required a conditional use permit, interim use permit, variance and site plan approval. The project was reviewed at a public hearing at the June 4th Planning Commission meeting and was approved by the City Council on June 25th. The required landscaping will be finalized and constructed after the downtown infrastructure project is completed. The City will release the remaining escrow when the planting is completed. Staff is working with the landowner to complete the outstanding items. 5. Comlink Midwest Site Plan, CUP, Variance and Rezoning at 23405 CR 10 (City file 19-011). The request is to allow construction of a contractor’s yard in the Rural Commercial (CR) district over 3-5 years. Phase 1 is for the 20,000 square foot Utility Construction building. This item was reviewed at a public hearing at the July 9th Planning Commission and Council approved on July 25th meeting. The approval included changes to the building architecture were approved by the Council at the August 22nd meeting. The applicant has indicated that they have found a site in a different city and will be restoring this site and closing out the file. 6. Wessel Property PUD Sketch Plan and EAW for 22020 Hackamore Road (PID 35-119-23-43-0001, 35-119-23-44-0001, 35-119-23-11-0001 and 35-119-23-12-0002) (City File 19-018). The sketch plan was reviewed by the Council on September 26th and staff was directed to begin the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. The EAW was acted on by the Council in January 2020. 7. Savoie Minor Subdivision at 21801 Homestead Trail (City file 19-021). This two-lot subdivision is was approved by the Council on October 24th. The council had previously approved this subdivision, but the applicant let it expire and an extension was approved. The subdivision was approved on October 24, 2019. 8. Sketch Plan for “Nelson International” at 10409 County Road 101 (city file 19-023). The applicant submitted a sketch plan for an approximately 33,000-sq. ft. truck sales/repair operation. The Council reviewed this item on January 23rd. 9. *Park Dedication Ordinance Update (city file no. 20-004). The park dedication fees are based on the comprehensive plan. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan was adopted in November and included some changes that require us to reevaluate our park dedication fee formula and make some minor edits to the ordinance. The Parks Commission will review on May 21st, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4th and City Council approved on June 11th. 10. Annual Ordinance Codification (city file no. 20-005). Staff prepares and annual codification to incorporate all of the previous year’s ordinance amendments into the City Code. The new PDF of the Code is now complete and available at City Hall and online. 11. Request for Variance, Preliminary and Final Plat for St. Jane Chantel cemetery (PID 21-119-23- 33-0004) (city file no. 20-001). Gene Kissner is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Variance to subdivide the 3.76-acre St. Jane Chantel parcel owned by Church of St. Thomas the Apostle. The portion north of County Road 50 contains the cemetery and will be retained by the church and Kissners will purchase the portion south of County Road 50. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 5th and recommended approval. Council approved the request on March 26th. 12. Bellwether 4th Final Plat and Final PUD (city file no.20-002). Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC (applicant) has submitted a request for approval of a Final Plat and Final PUD plan application for “Bellwether 4th Addition”, a residential development of 74 new single-family homes and one outlot on 45.49 acres of property. The Planning Commission reviewed on March 5th and recommended approval. Council approved the request on March 26th. 13. Zoning Map Changes (city file no. 20-003). Minnesota statues require cities to update their zoning map to bring it into compliance with the comprehensive plan within 9 months of adoption. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan was adopted in November and these map amendments will ensure consistency. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 5th and recommended approval. Council approved the request on March 26th. MEMORANDUM 4 14. Tessmer Topo/Wetland Waiver (PID 07-119-23-21-0002) (city file no.20-007). The applicant is requesting a waiver of the topography and wetland delineation requirements for this parcel. This parcel will be platted with the property to the west for a small division, but no development is proposed for this parcel. Council approved the request on March 26th. 15. Vollrath request for Ag Preserve designation and initiate expiration for 42.09 acres of land south of County Road 50 (PID 29-119-23-24-0001) (City File 20-010). The Council approved the request on March 26th. 16. *Paulsen Farms OSP Preliminary Plat (09-119-23-34-0001) (city file no. 20-011). The applicant has submitted an Open Space & Preservation Plat for the 88 acres on County Road 30. The plat would include 20 lots and preservation of 47 acres of open space. Staff is currently reviewing this application for completeness. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 7th, Parks and Trails Commission reviewed on May 21st and City Council approved on May 28th. 17. M/I Homes Concept Plan for a modification of the approvals for “Sawgrass” on the 103-acre parcel at 20400 County Road 10 (PID 23-119-23-42-0003) (City file no. 20-012). The Council approved an extension to the 2014 preliminary approvals so that the applicant could proceed with a final plat, final PUD development and PUD amendment. This concept plan is to outline the PUD amendments required for the new plan and ensure Council support before submitting a formal submittal. The Council was expected to review this item at their April 23rd meeting, but the applicant has withdrawn the application and will proceed with a formal final plat and final PUD application.. 18. Eagle Brook Church Concept Plan at the NW quadrant of Hackamore Road and County Road 101 (city file 20-013). Eagle Brook Church has submitted a concept plan for a new church on this site. The City Engineer is completing a feasibility study. The Council reviewed the plan at the April 23rd meeting. 19. *Laura Gibson has requested approval of a Special Home Occupation License at 7105 County Rd 19 (PID 30-119-23-31-0001) (city file 20-015). The applicant is requesting an Administrative Permit for a Special Home Occupation License to operate a hair salon business. There will be no employees and up to 28 clients per week. Staff has reviewed and sent notices of intent to surrounding property owners. The application has been administratively approved. 20. *Tabor Request for Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve Initiation of Expiration for 42.09 acres of land at 19450 Gleason Road (PID 36-119-23-12-0001) (City file 20-018). The landowner is requesting expiration of the Agricultural Preserve designation effective immediately as allowed under the 2019 changes to Minnesota Statute. This item was approved at the May 28th Council meeting. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 11b. Council Meeting: June 25, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Temporary Site Plan Amendment – The Stanchion Bar Action Required: None Summary: At the May 28, 2020 City Council meeting, a resolution was adopted authorizing the City Administrator the authority to grant regulatory flexibility to local busines ses and requiring a report of any action at the subsequent City Council meeting. On Thursday, June 11th following the City Council meeting that evening, The Stanchion Bar was authorized to temporarily expand its outdoor space using this authority. Attached to this report is the authorization granted, reported to the Council as required. Financial/Budget: Not applicable Options: 1.Take no action and allow the temporary approval. 2.Revoke the temporary approval. Recommendation: Take no action and allow the temporary approval. Council Action: Review the temporary approval and consider action. Attachments: 1.Temporary Site Plan Expansion – The Stanchion Bar A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered www.ci.corcoran.mn.us June 11, 2020 Kristy Benson Monnens The Stanchion Bar 20037 County Road 10 Corcoran, MN 55340 Kristy, This letter serves as your temporary approval to expand your outdoor space as shown on the below image in a fenced environment with no direct access from the outside in that location. This temporary approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must receive confirmation that your insurance coverages include all outdoor areas prior to opening. 2. The City Administrator may end this approval at any time if a safety issue exists that is not immediately rectified upon notification. 3. Expires upon the earliest of full capacity allowed by the State of Minnesota or August 31, 2020. 4. Additional improvements may be required following a further review after the area is completed to retain this approval. Further, it is strongly recommended that a concrete barrier be installed in front of the expanded area on the north side, directly in front of the new fence in an east/west manner as an additional safety measure. Sincerely, Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran 2020 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 12. July 9, 2020 • Employee Recognition – Jessica Beise, 5 Years • Employee Recognition – Pat Meister, 30 Years • Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project Recap • Draft 2021 Budget • Assessor Proposal Review • Eagle Scout Project Recognition – Frank Brand • City Hall remodel bid review • Charter Commission Application Manoj Thomas • Donation resolution for COVID-19 items • Resolution Honoring Outgoing Councilmember Brian Dejewski • Due Dilligence Commencement – Well/Treatment • Closed Session-Easement Acquisition – Southeast Watermain Project July 23, 2020 • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • Eagle Brook Church • Nelson Trucking • Bellwether 5th addition • Corridor Planning Grant Application August 13, 2020 Work Session • Public Works Department Update August 13, 2020 • Employee Recognition – Pete Ekenberg, 5 Years • Liquor License Fee Review (See April 23 meeting info) • Gravel Road Paving Recommendations • Police Body Camera Policy Public Hearing & Adoption • Fire Subcommittee Report Work Plan • Bring Your Own Device Policy