Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020-06-11 Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda June 11, 2020 - 7:00pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Commission Representatives* 5.Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6.Presentations/Recognitions 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of May 28, 2020 Council Meeting* b.Financial Claims* c.Test Well Installation – Pay Request 1* 8.Planning Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Park Dedication Fee Update* 9.Unfinished Business a.Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds – Series 2020A* b.Hackamore Road Improvements – 30% Design Review* 10.New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.2020 Fee Schedule Amendments* 11.Staff Reports a.Pandemic Response Update 12.2020 City Council Schedule* 13.Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.ci.corcoran.mn.us. Telephone Meeting Call-in Instructions Call: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 871 9060 0177 Press *9 to Comment during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov Due to the COVID-19 health pandemic, the City Council’s regular meeting place is not available and is not open to the public. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D.021 the one or more members of the City Council may participate by telephone or other electronic means. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 4. Council Meeting: June 11, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commission Representatives Action Required: None – Informational Summary: The advisory commission representatives for the June 11th Council meeting are as follows: • Planning Commission: Dean Jacobs • Parks and Trails Commission: Phil Christenson Financial/Budget: N/A Options: N/A Recommendation N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: N/A CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes May 28, 2020 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on May 28, 2020, in Corcoran, Minnesota. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 13D.021 and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council meeting was held remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Present were Mayor Thomas at City Hall and present via telephonic or other electronic means were Councilor Anderson, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Dejewski, and Councilor Schultz. Also present were City Administrator Martens, and Administrative Services Director Beise. Public Works Director Mattson and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk were present via telephonic or other electronic means. 1.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Thomas invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 2.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor Thomas called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Martens noted three items were added to New Business and include 9a. Absentee Voting for the Statewide Primary, 9b. Resolution Authorizing Granting Regulatory Flexibility to Work with Local Businesses, and 9e. 2020 Staffing Plan. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Anderson to approve the agenda as modified. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 4.Commission Representatives Mayor Thomas noted Planning Commissioner Shoulak was present via telephonic or other electronic means. City Administrator Martens noted Parks and Trails Commissioner Hoffmann was not currently present. 5.Open Forum (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor Thomas invited residents to communicate telephonically at Open Forum and noted the public comment instructions. City Administrator Martens clarified instructions for any persons wishing to comment. Administrative Services Director Beise indicated one caller was waiting and invited the caller to join the Open Forum and to state their name and address. Joe Maas, 6715 Willow Drive, commented on the safety of gravel roads in Corcoran. Mr. Maas specifically addressed the gravel road where Larkin Road is not paved, and additionally Willow Drive, Horseshoe Trail and Homestead Trail gravel roads. Mr. Maas indicated an email receipt of a gravel road maintenance schedule, but stated in his opinion, the current planned maintenance schedule is not ensuring safe travel on gravel roads. Council indicated paving of roads has been a focus and priority of Council for the past 20 years and Council will continue to review paving of gravel roads in Corcoran. Mr. Maas acknowledged assessments for paving roads, and shared information regarding state monies and grants available for road paving projects like the gravel road area at the corner of Willow Drive and Larkin Road. Mr. Maas asked Council how residents can assist in promoting paved roads in Corcoran and thanked Council for their time and service. 6.Presentations/Recognitions a.2019 Audit Presentation – Justin Nilson and Tyler See, Abdo Eick and Meyers Mayor Thomas introduced Justin Nilson and Tyler See of Abdo Eick and Meyers. Mr. Nilson thanked Council and staff for their time and assistance with the audit. Mr. Nilson noted a clean, unmodified audit opinion which is the best audit opinion a City can receive, and there were no audit findings for 2019. Mr. See and Mr. Nilson reviewed various fund balances, revenue and expenses, debt service funds, positive trends in the Water Fund Cash Balance, Sewer Fund Cash Balances and Enterprise Funds Balances, and closed the presentation with key performance indicators. Council inquired about revenue in permits and licenses and city-inspection expenditure itemizations. Mr. Nilson referred Council to the summary Agenda Item 7a. 2 page. Council asked about the tax rate and per capita performance indicators and requested an explanation of the difference between tax base and tax per capita. Mr. Nilson explained tax base is based on home values and how many homes, and taxes per capita is overall taxes per number of people. Mr. Nilson also noted the tax rate is typically a better metric to review. Council noted the positive trend in numbers within the audit reflect the appropriate management of the City’s finances by staff. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Anderson to accept the 2019 audit as presented. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 7. Consent Agenda a. Draft Minutes of May 14, 2020 Council Meeting b. Financial Claims c. Liquor License Approvals d. Request for Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve Initiation and Expiration for 49 acres of land owned by Kevin and Denise Tabor e. Approval of Notice of Acceptance of Bridle Path f. Police Technician Job Description Update MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Schultz to approve consent agenda as presented. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 8. Unfinished Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor Thomas invited residents to communicate telephonically at Unfinished Business and noted the public comment instructions. Administrative Services Director Beise invited callers to join the Public Comment Opportunity and to state their name and address. Tom Spiczka, 9301 Cain Road, addressed Council and commented on taxation for dust control, use of calcium chloride application, utilization of the dirt roads by residents in Corcoran, and the consideration of eliminating the assessment in a previous Council meeting. Council thanked Mr. Spiczka for his comments. Council discussed issues of dust control, and Council action to reduce the dust control fee to residents, long-term plans regarding dust control, and that Council is not ignoring his prior comments. Dean Vehrenkamp, 9310 Bechtold Road, addressed Council and noted agreement with the previous caller. Mr. Vehrenkamp does not believe he should be responsible for the dust control assessment as the dust from the road does not reach his house. Mr. Vehrenkamp expressed his opinion that dust control assessments are a double taxation, and if all City residents are paying for maintenance of paved roads, all residents should also pay for calcium chloride applications to all roads. Council thanked Mr. Vehrenkamp for his comments. a. Northeast Corcoran Water Supply – Work Plan Update Public Works Director Mattson reviewed staff and Council action over the last year and half regarding the Northeast Corcoran Water Supply Work Plan Project. Public Works Director Mattson indicated the site acquisition purchase agreement for the well and water treatment site is secured, a permit from the DNR for a well water assessment was approved, results from the Northwest Area Regional Water Supply Study the City participated in are available, and design and installation of the City’s first municipal test well is complete with test pump and water quality sampling in process. Public Works Director Mattson reviewed the continued processes of the water supply plan through 2022, the next steps for water treatment and tower design, and budget allocations in 2020. City Engineer Torve discussed the test well installation process, the discovery of an aquifer at 280 feet down, determined the thickness of the aquifer with positive results of about 150 feet depth of aquifer, the 24-hour pump test showed results of 250 gallons per minute range, with an ultimate well target of 400-800 gallons per minute. City Engineer Torve noted the three-inch capacity test well of 250 gallons in comparison to the twelve-inch municipal well capable of reaching the goal of 400-800 gallon per minute capacity. City Engineer Torve indicated results were good and the process is going per plan. Council inquired about water treatment options and how it relates to homeowners. City Engineer Torve explained with normal results, sand filtration is the best option to remove iron and manganese for city treatment, however, residents would still need a softener for water. Council asked about the possibility of the City maintained softener system within the City water system. City Engineer Torve indicated softener application will be a future maintenance system but will be utilized within the wastewater treatment process and is at least 10 3 to 20 years away from implementation. Council inquired if the test well and municipal well will be the same depth. City Engineer Torve indicated the depths would be almost identical between the two wells. MOTION: made by Anderson, seconded by Schultz to approve completion of a feasibility study for water treatment and tower design as presented. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) b. City Hall Closure Extension City Administrator Martens outlined the Stay Safe Minnesota Phase 2 and requested extension of City Hall closure through June 12, 2020. City Administrator Martens noted plexiglass installation is scheduled the week of June 1, 2020. Council inquired where the plexiglass installation is located. City Administrator Martens indicated it will be at the front desk to protect City Hall staff. MOTION: made by Anderson, seconded by Schultz to extend City Hall closure through June 12, 2020. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 9. New Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor Thomas invited residents to communicate telephonically prior to New Business discussion and noted the public comment instructions of pressing *9 to be recognized to speak. No persons participated in the public comment portion of the meeting. a. Public Hearing – 2020 Dust Control Project City Administrator Martens outlined the 2020 Dust Control program with neighborhood assessment costs, City expenses, and total costs of the project. City Administrator Martens noted the product costs have increased, but staff proposed assessment rates to remain the same as 2019 rates. City Administrator Martens clarified paving costs for overlays to paved roads are assessed to residents upon the second overlay of the paved road, with the first overlay subsidized by the City. In addition to City subsidized road costs, City Administrator Martens noted the gravel cost for roads are also subsidized by the City budget. City Administrator Martens noted an email notice was received indicating four of the six properties located on Homestead Trail would like to be removed from dust control applications this year. City Administrator Martens indicated staff is awaiting a formal petition for removal of dust control applications. Mayor Thomas opened the Public Hearing. Mayor Thomas invited residents to communicate telephonically during the Public Hearing and noted the public comment instructions of pressing *9 to be recognized to speak. Administrative Services Director Beise invited the caller to join the Public Comment Opportunity and to state their name and address. Dean Vehrenkamp, 9315 Bechtold Road, commented on changing dust control applications to be at the request of the resident, and then have resident be responsible for their assessment portion. City Administrator Martens summarized a written comment received from a resident, Shirley Reiss, 22202 Horseshoe Trail stating they do not wish to participate in the dust control application, and do not want to be assessed the $81.00 fee. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Anderson to close the Public Hearing. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) Council addressed the question by resident asking to be included within the dust control application and indicated the Council does allow residents to request dust control application. Council also clarified residents who live on paved roads are also assessed for overlay costs, as residents who live on gravel roads are assessed for dust control. Council discussed the policy in place reflecting on dust control assessments, fairness of the assessments, and the possibility of different gravel product on the gravel roads. Council discussed dust control applications on neighborhood roads, collector roads, and future dust control processes. MOTION: made by Anderson, seconded by Dejewski to approve Resolution 2020-40 ordering improvement of dust control treatments to be applied to city streets in 2020, with an amendment to authorize staff to remove Homestead Trail between Rolling Hills Road and Willow Drive, if a petition is submitted by 4:00 pm on June 4, 2020, with a majority of those accessing the road in favor of removal from dust control application. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, and Dejewski Nay Vote: Schultz (Motion carried 4:1) 4 b. 2021 Budget Expectations City Administrator Martens outlined the draft 2021 budget expectations, targets, staff planning, and Council priorities. City Administrator Martens reviewed anticipated development growth. Council discussed maintaining the same tax rate as in previous years, stated the need for additional staffing with water supply changes, and sewer and water may also need additional support. Council inquired about increases in tax revenue in new developments and if the expenditures for new staff and increased cost of new roads is covered through the tax revenue generated. City Administrator Martens stated developers pay for building roads so no city investment is needed, the tax base comes in but is spread out over a two year time span; with valuations established in January on the land, and again the following year once the home is built, equating to a two year lag in received revenues. Council discussed allocating budgeted monies for promoting industrial and commercial development. Council supported maintaining the current tax rate and that the tax rate should reflect the rate of growth in Corcoran. Council noted the City is in a good position with current staffing needs; however, Council needs to be aware of new staffing needs as the City grows. Council discussed maintaining the tax rate applicable to the growth of the City. Council and staff discussed promoting an employee to the sergeant position and filling the officer position. Council noted neutral budget items and noted concerns in increasing the tax rate to pay for new positions unless new revenue from growth offsets the expense. City Administrator Martens indicated the sergeant position offers a semi-supervisory tier, and currently all calls are routed to the director of public safety and the lieutenant. Council discussed the of need for the staffing additions and reflected support with revenue growth to support additional positions. Council expressed the desire to include public safety funds, for fire and ambulatory services. c. Absentee Voting Administrative Services Director Beise outlined the impacts of the COVID pandemic on absentee voting services and changes relating to the Primary Election; Hennepin County has requested input on continuation of absentee in person polling locations at City Halls. Administrative Services Director Beise noted surrounding communities have had discussions regarding absentee voting processes with City Halls. Administrative Services Director Beise indicated limiting in person voting services at City Hall to seven days prior to election during direct balloting would assist in keeping staff and residents safe with the peak of the COVID pandemic hitting in Minnesota mid-June to mid-August. Administrative Services Director Beise noted mail-in voting will continue to be available to all residents. Administrative Services Director Beise stated no changes to the General Election are currently anticipated. Council asked with the low number of residents participating in absentee voting why is it necessary to limit in person voting. Council discussed concerns with voting being a basic government service and reviewed the hesitation some people encounter having to travel to Minneapolis to complete in person absentee voting. Administrative Services Director Beise responded and reiterated limiting in person voting services at City Hall to seven days prior to election during direct balloting would assist in keeping staff and residents safe with the peak of the COVID pandemic hitting in Minnesota mid-June to mid-August and indicated Hennepin County is encouraging the mail-in voting option versus the in person absentee voting option. Administrative Services Director Beise indicated the deadline for the City ballot order is June 6. Council discussed access to other voting options and supports limiting in person absentee voting at City Hall to seven days prior to the Primary Election. Administrative Services Director Beise outlined the different ways voters can vote and reviewed with Council how the seven day in person absentee voting process works and allows for fewer document touches by voters and staff. Council discussed the different ways for voters to continue to vote in the Primary Election regarding in person absentee voting limited to the direct balloting period seven days prior to the Primary Election. Council questioned if dial-in is an option for voters to request a voting application and the fact that some counties only provide mail-in voting. Council would like to know if there is an ability to request a ballot by phone as a source for residents without internet access. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Anderson to authorize staff to adjust the in-person voting period for the Statewide Primary Election to seven days prior to the election. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) d. Resolution Authorizing the Granting of Regulatory Flexibility to Local Businesses 5 City Administrator Martens discussed Minnesota Stay Safe Phase 2 regarding reopening of local businesses. City Administrator Martens indicated currently the city administrator does not have authority to approve written plans to support business openings or authority to extend through October 31, 2020. Council asked for clarification of authority actions and for clarification of report submissions to Council. City Administrator Martens noted the resolution addition to include submitting a report to the City Council identifying the businesses granted regulatory flexibility and the type of flexibility granted at the subsequent Council meeting following the approval. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Schultz to adopt Resolution 2020-42 authorizing the city administrator the authority to grant regulatory flexibility to local businesses and includes submitting a report to the City Council identifying the businesses granted regulatory flexibility and type of flexibility granted at the subsequent Council meeting following the approval. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) e. 2020 Staffing – City Planner and Maintenance Worker Positions City Administrator Martens requested approvals to start process for hiring the city planner and maintenance worker positions. Per consensus, staff was authorized to move forward with beginning the hiring processes for the city planner and maintenance worker positions. 10. Planning Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor Thomas invited residents to communicate telephonically prior to New Business discussion and noted the public comment instructions of pressing *9 to be recognized to speak. Administrative Services Director Beise invited the caller to join the Public Comment Opportunity and to state their name and address. Dean Vehrenkamp, 9310 Bechtold Road, commented on the Paulsen Farms development, and referenced a portion of the presentation where it indicates a dedicated road on the western portion of property and connects to Outlot B; the outlot is all wetland and is a ditch, and with a dedicated road there will be issues with access off that road. Mr. Vehrenkamp is concerned about water run off and where it will go and is also concerned about lack of design standards for homes in this neighborhood and would like to understand aesthetically how this neighborhood will look overall as it is open to independent builders. a. Open Space and Preservation Plat for “Paulsen Farms” City Planner Lindahl outlined the Paulsen Farms Open Space and Preservation Plat application and noted it is the first application since the Open Space and Preservation (OS & P) Plat Ordinance was updated. City Planner Lindahl indicated through the Ordinance update, preservation plats can be completed by a preliminary plat and does not require a PUD or CUP anymore, and allows landowners an opportunity to maximize their building rights in exchange for preserving 50 percent of upland open space until municipal sewer and water are available in the future. City Planner Lindahl indicated there were a few changes the City would make as required conditions to the plan. City Planner Lindahl noted the Planning Commission received an email from a resident indicating concerns about county road traffic and Public Safety provided a response in a memo. City Planner Lindahl reviewed a Planning Commission concern included lack of details for the open space maintenance plan, covenants and restrictions. City Planner Lindahl reviewed property access from County Road 30 and stated no additional access is planned now, or in the future from Bechtold Road. City Planner Lindahl recapped the City would still take right-of-way to allow for future improvements for Bechtold Road as the property butts up to Bechtold Road. City Planner Lindahl noted the additional connection roads to the east and south on the property. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the preliminary plat, development rights on the property, lot sizes, future planned roads and condition of platting for those roads, and outlot ownership and usage. City Planner Lindahl reviewed OS&P design and indicated the 2004 Ordinance regarding design goals developers should try to comply with, however it is not a requirement. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the ditch stream stabilization, stormwater management to ensure compliance, and transportation aspects. Council clarified the preliminary plat will mimic the final plat and Council would have limited discretion on plat changes. City Planner Lindahl indicated within the Resolution, the City will include clear conditions, requiring changes and details to the plans prior to review and approval of preservation restoration and management. Council inquired about the resident traffic concern and if the response adequately addressed the concern. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk reported snapshot traffic at the intersection 6 of High Bluff Lane and County Road 30 was mostly traffic initiated items but noted substantive concerns at Bechtold and County Road 30 with traffic issues. Council and staff discussed the ghost platting for future development and requirements of municipal sewer and water, wetland delineation, and the impacts to the lot sizes. Council questioned the open space preservation area and if the property complies with proximity of lots being located along the open space preservation areas. Council and staff discussed preservation open space areas exist as a temporary conservation easement tool until the preservation transitions into additional lots with sewer city and water. Council and staff reviewed the City’s establishment of OS&Ps and that OS&Ps offer a landowner an opportunity of development rights while also meeting natural resource and agricultural goals. Council inquired about placement of trails within the 100-foot buffer and City Planner Lindahl indicated there is no restriction. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Schultz to authorize Resolution 2020-38 Approving the Preliminary OS&P Plat for “Paulsen Farms” for DS Management Group, LLC on an 82.73-Acre Site (PID 09-119-23-34-0001) (City File 20-011). Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 11. Staff Reports a. Active Corcoran Planning Applications. Council received reports. b. Pandemic Response Update Director of Public Safety Gottschalk updated Council on current COVID-19 numbers in Minnesota, reviewed updates within the Emergency Operations Center, continued support of community as businesses, churches and local businesses begin to open, and continued monitoring of safety within the City. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk discussed the impacts to the City regarding the recent protests in Minneapolis. City Administrator Martens indicated June Council meetings will still be held virtually, election training has been held virtually, COVID costs are just under $30,000 and staff continues to do a good job. Council and staff discussed legislation presented by Representative Hertaus regarding COVID reimbursements and City will begin the process of expense reimbursement from FEMA. 12. 2020 Council Schedule 13. Adjournment MOTION: made by Anderson, seconded by Dejewski to adjourn. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:50 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk Agenda Item 7b. Council Meeting Date: 6/11/2020 FINANCIAL CLAIMS Prepared By: jrotz CHECK RANGE FUND #500 ESCROW CLAIMSAgendaItem: 7b. Paid toAmountProject name 500-20487$35.63CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER - Eaglebrook Church #20-013 500-20495$1,000.00GIBSON, LAURA - ESCROW REFUND Gleason - Admin Permit 20-015 Total 1,035.63 Total Fund #500 = 1,035.63 See attached Payments Detail) ALL OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMSAgendaItem:7b.$ 155,544.85$ 156,580.48Total Checks See attached Check Detail Register) Total of Auto Deductions 27,239.05 TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL$ 183,819.53 Auto Deductions / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursements DatePaid toAmount 5/27/2020Paypal *GSUITEADDON$ 29.00 COVID-19supplies PD 6/1/2020Fastsigns ofMinnetonka$ 362.49 COVID-19supplies city hall 5/22/2020MN DEPT OF REVEN, MNRev pay$ 49.02 Monthly fuel tax 5/26/2020State of MN - MSRS$ 2,028.84State of MN healthcare savings plan 5/26/2020State of MN - Roth$ 2,258.31Deferred compensation payment toState ofMN 5/26/2020Optum - H SA$ 3,368.73Health savings account 5/26/2020PERA$ 13,616.22Pension plan 5/28/2020SUN LIFE $ 1,246.92SunLife Life Insurance, STD, and LTD 5/28/2020SUN LIFE $ 2,137.73SunLife Life Insurance, STD, and LTD 5/28/2020SUN LIFE $ 2,141.79SunLife Life Insurance, STD, and LTD Total 27,239.05 H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\CouncilClaims\\2020ClaimsWorkbook.xls 10100FarmersStateBankUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-45200-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-223BuildingRepairSuppliesE100-43100-417UniformsE100-42100-223BuildingRepairSuppliesE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-321TelephoneE100-45200-321TelephoneE205-42100-304LegalFeesE100-42100-304LegalFeesE100-41600-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41600-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E419-43100-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)G500-20487EaglebrookChurch #20-013E100-41600-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-41600-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41600-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41600-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-43100-212MotorFuelsE100-42100-212MotorFuelsE100-43100-212MotorFuelsE100-41951-207ComputerSuppliesE100-41941-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-45200-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)Total CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDERTotal A-1OUTDOORPOWERINCTotal BEAUDRYOILCOMPANY Total AGCNETWORKSINCTotal CENTURYLINKTotal ACMETOOLSA-1OUTDOORPOWERINCCINTAS - 470CENTURY LINKCARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDERBEAUDRY OILCOMPANYAGC NETWORKSINCADP, LLCACMETOOLSTotal ADP, LLC$1,012.95$398.00$116.94$121.33$125.51$128.00$178.76$886.88$498.77$142.50$344.38$510.63$625.87$776.96$242.00$389.95$22.99$24.10$35.76$87.40$3563$35.63$47.50$43.73$82.504644734052151638405171055340517104844051710469405171038006042005282005282005282005282005282005282005282005282005282005282005282016132881613288161328780100009205576047087608862SUPPLIESFLOOR MATS - POLICEUNIFORMSFLOOR MATS - POLICEPUBLICWORKSCITYHALLLANDLINE/FIREMONITORING-9100763-498-7515LANDLINE763-420-4061VEHICLE FORFEITURECRIMINALRavinia - WhiteTailTrailLennarLOCHACKAMOREROADIMPROVEMENTS2294-0028Eaglebrook Church #20-013CORONAVIRUSPANDEMIC (COVID-19)Brolin Driveway Agreement8025 Ridge Court ConnectionCIVIL - LEGALGASOLINEDIESEL FUELUC SME - Remote ServiceWORKFORCE NOW PAYROLL SOLUTIONS BUNDLESUPPLIESSUPPLIES06/04/20 5:47PMCITYOFCORCORAN1,446.56$3,693.63$787.95$253.51$242.00$22.99$82. 50 Page 1 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E601-49400-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)G500-20495Gleason - AdminPermit20-015E601-49400-215WaterMetersE601-49400-215WaterMetersE100-42100-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E601-49400-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsE101-41911-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41910-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41910-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41910-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41951-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41951-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-43100-321TelephoneE100-42100-321TelephoneE100-41941-321TelephoneE205-42100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E205-42100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E205-42100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-417 UniformsTotal COMPUTERINTEGRATIONTECHTotal FERGUSONWATERWORKSTotal EMBEDDEDSYSTEMS, INC.TotalEHRENNER & SONSINC Total ECMPUBLISHERSINCTotal COMCAST- 902943336Total CITYWIDESERVICETotal GIBSON, LAURATotal CINTAS - 470CITYWIDESERVICEGOPHERSTATEONECALLGIBSON, LAURAFERGUSONWATERWORKSEMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC.EH RENNER & SONS INCCOMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH$47,184.12$1,000.00$121.33$191.70$639.60$680.00$830.25$776.00$120.70$120.70$120.70$120.00$340.00$270.00$116.94$42.73$47.49$31.66$35.62$35.62$69.0040521516850050310ESCROW REF04549180452267344059P AY #177676677676577676477676329357929342810116934810116934810116934841364328932464640521517424052151706CITY HALLSERVICEESCROW REFUNDMETERSMETERSEmergency Siren Maintenance Fee 20207-1-20TO12-TESTWELL 100% COMPLETEDCOMPPLANAMENDMENTPHSUBDIVISIONORDINANCEAMENDMENTACCESSORYBUILDINGADDITIONPHJUNE4KARINIEMIADDITIONITMANAGED SERVICE - MTHITMANAGED SERVICEMTHLANDLINELANDLINELANDLINEDWIFORFEITURETOWING/IMPOUNDFEESDWIFORFEITURETOWING/IMPOUNDFEESDWIFORFEITURETOWING/IMPOUNDFEESPUBLICWORKSUNIFORMS06/04/205:47PMCITYOFCORCORAN47,184.12$1,319.60$1,000.00$666.53$830.25$150.39$845.00$362.10$730. 00 31- 20 Page 2 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E602-49450-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E601-49400-303EngineeringFeesE100-45200-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-45200-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E602-49450-310OtherProfessionalServicesE100-42400-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41300-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41600-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-42100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-208 TrainingandInstructionTotal METRO WESTINSPECTION SERVICESTotal NAGELL APPRAISAL & CONSULTINGTotal MADDEN, GALANTER, HANSEN LLPTotal METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MCESTotal HOLIDAY STATION STORESTotal GOPHER STATEONE CALLTotal MIDWEST MACHINERY CO.Total MINNESOTAEQUIPMENT Total GOTTSCHALK, MATTTotal MARTENS, BRADGOTTSCHALK, MATTNAPAAUTOPARTS -CORCORANNAGELLAPPRAISAL & CONSULTINGMINNESOTAEQUIPMENTMIDWESTMACHINERYCO.METROPOLITANCOUNCILMCESMETROWESTINSPECTIONSERVICESMARTENS, BRADMADDEN, GALANTER, HANSENLLPHOLIDAYSTATIONSTORESGRAINGERTotal GRAINGER$29,947.54$46,742.85$191.70$117.39$110.97$900.00$452.99$343.48$527.00$259.68($67.99)$75.78$50.00$50.00$7.98005031029320829320729178329025127918P2052121460020604 202445052620060220003401062000060220SERVICESUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIES2020 TRUNK WATER MAIN - WATERMAIN SUPPLIESPARTSSAC ACTIVITYFINALIZED INSPECTIONSMILEAGELEGAL FEESPRE PAID CAR WASHSUPPLIESTRAINING06/04/20 5:47PMCITYOFCORCORAN29,947.54$46,742.85$383.40$900.00$452.99$343.48$527.00$259.68$75.78$50.00$50. 00IMPROVEMENTPROJECTCR 116 Page 3 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-45200-221MaintenanceProjectsE100-41400-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-41920-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-41951-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-321TelephoneE100-42100-323RadioUnitsG100-21707UnionDuesE100-43100-321TelephoneE100-43100-210OperatingSuppliesGENERAL)E100-41550-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41550-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41550-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-380Utility & ServicesGENERAL)E100-45200-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-43232-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41941-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-41920-131EmployerPaidHealthE100-41941-201 Postage/ShippingE100-42100-210 OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)Total RANDYSENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTotal ROLFERICKSONENTERPRISESINCTotal ON-SITEMEDICALSERVICESINCTotal NAPAAUTOPARTS - CORCORANTotal SITEONELANDSCAPESUPPLYTotal NUTRIENAGSOLUTIONS, INC. Total TEAMSTERLOCAL320Total PRITCHARD, MIKETotal POSTMASTERNUTRIEN AGSOLUTIONS, INC.VERIZONWIRELESSTEAMSTER LOCAL320SPRINTSITEONELANDSCAPESUPPLYROLFERICKSONENTERPRISESINCRANDYSENVIRONMENTALSERVICESPRITCHARD, MIKEPOSTMASTERTotal SPRINT$1,164.00$6,003.00999.90$450.39$352.33$400.68$723.35$163.12$495.20$556.49$350.00$240.00$780.00($21.00)$66.81$40.01$43.55$26.40($5.25)42304786985543209298554320929855432092JUN20391283315-2299268543-0010526200526200526 2005272005272005272005272006032005272019653SUPPLIESCELL SERVICECELL SERVICECode Enforcement IpadCELL SERVICERADIO UNITSUNION DUES/TLDFCELL SERVICESUPPLIESCOUNTY DATA FEEMONTHLY ASSESSING FEEFORMS AND SUPPLIESPUBLIC WORKS GARBAGE (9100) 12PARKS GARBAGE 11039MONTHLY RECYCLINGCITY HALL GARBAGE 12803512020 FSA ReimbursementBULK MAIL PERMIT #28 - EXP DATE07-18-2020PD PPE FITTING06/04/205:47PMCITYOFCORCORAN2,282.50$6,192.52$168.35$400.68$723.35$350.00$240.00$780.00$999.90$43. 55 Page 4 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check FundSummaryUnpaidUnpaid 10100FarmersStateBank100GENERALFUND602SEWER601WATER500ESCROWHOLDINGFUND419HACKAMOREUPGRADE (LENNAR)205DWIFORFEITUREFUND101LONG-TERMPLANNINGFUNDE100-45200-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-43100-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-41941-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)Total WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Total VERIZON WIRELESSTotal XCEL ENERGYWOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERSXCEL ENERGY$57,916.13$46,934.55$49,595.42$1,035.63$908.76$142.50$3,300.00$47.49$883.55$49.75985543209268584400366657CELLSERVICEUTILITIES 9100ARCHITECT FEES06/04/20 5:47 PMCITYOFCORCORAN3,300.00$866.23$883.5510100FarmersStateBank$156,580.48 156,580.48 Page 5 Check Detail Register© June 2020 Check AmtInvoiceComment CityofCorcoran ConsultantSummary 6/11/2020 NameInvoice DateAmount Due Carson, Clelland & Schreder05/28/20 3,693.63 Landform Metro West Inspection06/01/20 29,947.54 Rolf Erickson Enterprises05/26/20 6,192.52 Wenck Associates Total$ 39,833.69 H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\Council Claims\\2020ClaimsWorkbook.xls Technical Memo Wenck | Colorado | Georgia | Minnesota | North Dakota | Wyoming Toll Free 800-472-2232 Web wenck.com To: Brad Martens, City Administrator From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Date: June 2, 2020 Subject: Pay Request #1 – Corcoran Test Well Installation Council Action Requested Approve Pay Request #1 to E.H. Renner & Sons in the amount of $47,184.12 Project Summary •Contract Amount - $49,720.00 •Change Orders to Date - $0 •Projected Total - $49,667.50 Financing Funding is provided by the water utility fund. Project Update This amount brings the total approved to date to 100% of the total project value before withholding the 5% retainage amount of $2,483.38. The requested amount is related to drilling the well, installing the casing, completing test pumping, water samples, and completing the televising and gamma logging. Next Steps Engineering will review well data of upcoming water quality results, televising and gamma logging report. Agenda Item 7c. 6/2/2020 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: June 4, 2020 for the June 11, 2020 Planning Commission Meeting RE: Park Dedication Fee Update (city file no. 20-004) 60-Day Review Deadline: N/A 1.Application Request Review and comment on an update to the park dedication requirements of the Subdivision Regulations, Chapter 9 of the City Code. 2.Parks Commission Discussion The Parks Commission had limited discussion about the update to park dedication fees and recommended approval of the revised fees. 3.Planning Commission Discussion The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on this item on June 4th. Staff will provide a verbal update at the Council meeting on June 11th. 4.Background Corcoran’s current park dedication standards were developed in 2011 based on the park and trail system needs identified by the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. In December 2014, the City made several amendments to address specific concerns about the method for calculating density, how park dedication credit would be given for trails and what trail improvements developers must make. Language was also added to clarify that “park dedication is not due for parcels that have previously paid park dedication (land or cash-in-lieu)”. In April of 2016, more significant amendments were made to address concerns with the residential dedication formula and ensure that the cash dedications were adequate to meet the City’s needs. 5.Analysis MN Statute §462.358 requires that park dedication requirements be based on the adopted comprehensive plan. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan update was recently adopted by the City of Corcoran. The Comprehensive Plan provides the anticipated future parks and trails based on the Agenda Item: 8a. Park Dedication Fee Update (20-004) 2 June 11, 2020 growth forecast for the City. The parks and trails planned for in the Comprehensive Plan are different from the previous comprehensive plan. Park dedication is the City’s tool to fund the necessary park and trail improvements and is being updated to be consistent with the planned improvements from the updated comprehensive plan. The fair market value of land is required to be based on the annual tax valuations or other relevant data determined annually by the municipality. We contacted the City Assessor for the current land values that are used in the park dedication calculations. As part of the update the cost assumptions for land value, trail construction and park improvements were updated to the current values in the market. The table below shows the previous park dedication and updated park dedication. Park Dedication 2016 Park Dedication 2020 Park Dedication Change Single Family $3,970 $4,628 +16.6% Multi-Family $2,694 $3,141 +16.6% Commercial and Industrial $4,135 $4,498 +8.7% The fee increases would be amended at the June 11th City Council meeting as part of the fee schedule amendments. The increase is a result of several factors: • the total population expected has decreased from the growth forecast in the 2030 plan; • the land value has increased since the last update; • a portion of boardwalk has been included for the total off road trail length increasing the overall cost; • The planned overpass/underpass crossings have been added to the trail costs. Now that the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is complete, staff recommends an annual review of the park dedication calculations to update the land values and construction costs and ensure that the park dedication fees keep pace with development costs. Ordinance Amendment In addition to the fee schedule updates, staff is recommending two minor changes to the Subdivision Ordinance to implement these changes. The changes update the code to be consistent with the density for each land use identified in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and update the percentage of dedication to be consistent with the updated fees. The code revisions are shown below. Land Dedication Requirements: Land Use Category based on the Comprehensive Plan Units per acre (Density, Net – Pre-Development) Percentage of land Rural/Ag Residential Less than 3 4% Low Density Residential 3-5 15% Medium-Density Residential 65-8 17% Park Dedication Fee Update (20-004) 3 June 11, 2020 Mixed Residential 8-10 2728% High-Density Residential and Mixed-Use 10+-30 2224% Mixed-Use 8-30 19% Commercial and Industrial N/A 3% Commercial and industrial land uses: Dedication requirement is five three percent (3%) of land or equivalent market value in cash. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt the following: a. Ordinance 2020-405 amending Section 955.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance b. Resolution 2020-43 approving findings of fact for the ordinance amendment c. Summary Ordinance 2020-406 for publication Approval of the ordinance and resolution approving the amendment requires a 3/5 vote. Approval of the summary ordinance requires a 4/5 vote. Attachments 1. Ordinance 2020-405 amending Section 955.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance 2. Resolution 2020-43 approving findings of fact for the ordinance amendment 3. Summary Ordinance 2020-406 for publication 4. Park Dedication Fee Spreadsheet City of Corcoran June 11, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2020-405 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF TITLE IX OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO PARK DEDICATION (CITY FILE 20-004) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 955.020 Subd. 6 “Required Dedication” (Subdivision Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: Land Dedication Requirements: Land Use Category based on the Comprehensive Plan Units per acre (Density, Net – Pre-Development) Percentage of land Rural/Ag Residential Less than 3 4% Low Density Residential 3-5 15% Medium-Density Residential 65-8 17% Mixed Residential 8-10 2728% High-Density Residential and Mixed-Use 10+-30 2224% Mixed-Use 8-30 19% Commercial and Industrial N/A 3% The City Council will identify a park dedication fee per residential unit to be paid in lieu of land dedication when the council determines that that land is not needed in the area of the proposed subdivision. If the council determines that land is needed in the subdivision, but in a lesser amount than the required percentage, the council will require payment of the per unit fee based on a pro-rata share of the land dedication that would otherwise be required. The City Council shall review park dedication fee requirements periodically, to ensure that the required fee remains consistent with park and trail system development costs. Commercial and industrial land uses: Dedication requirement is five three percent (3%) of land or equivalent market value in cash. Page 2 of 2 SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 11th day of June 2020. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran June 11, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-43 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF TITLE IX OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO PARK DEDICATION (CITY FILE 20-004) WHEREAS, the City has initiated an amendment to update the park dedication fees to be consistent with the adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan as required by MN Statute §462.358. WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with and implement the 2040 Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it does approve an amendment to Title IX (Subdivision Ordinance) of the City Code to amend the park dedication, based on the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment would be consistent with State law and the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 2. The amendment changes the density to match the density outlined in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for each residential land use. 3. The amendment would align the percentage of park dedication for each land use to match the updated park dedication fees. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 11th day of June 2020. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran June 11, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2020-406 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2020-405 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF TITLE IX OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 20-004) The text of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended to amend Title IX to revise the land dedication requirements to be consistent with updated park dedication fees. A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 11th day of June 2020. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran Park Dedication Calculations, 2020Land Use CategoryAcresPop/Unit Minimum Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max AvgRural/Ag Residential 6,270 2.8 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.28 0.28 0.28 1,756 1,756 1,756 Low Density Residential 2,657 2.8 3.00 5.00 4.00 8.40 14.00 11.20 22,319 37,198 29,758 Medium Density Residental 66 1.9 5.00 8.00 6.50 9.50 15.20 12.35 627 1,003 815 Mixed Residental 450 1.9 8.00 10.00 9.00 15.20 19.00 17.10 6,840 8,550 7,695 High Density Residential 80 1.9 10.00 30.00 20.00 19.00 57.00 38.00 1,520 4,560 3,040 Mixed Use 230 1.9 8.00 30.00 19.00 15.20 57.00 36.10 3,488 13,082 8,285 Commercial and Industrial 707 0Total Population Expected: 36,550 (Use minimum densities)Per Capita Share of Park SystemResidential Share 95% $60,417,354C/I Share 5% $3,179,861Total Cost of Park System$63,597,215Per Capita Share 1,653.01$ Per Unit ShareSingle Family2.84,628.44$ Multi Family1.93,140.73$ C/I Share Per Acre: 4,497.68$ Units per acre Persons Per Acre Total PopPopulation Estimates 5a. Attachment A: Corcoran Park Dedication Park Facilities and Land Cost Estimates, 2020 Update Parks Total # of Existing Park Facilities Total # of Existing Park Acres Total # of Future (2040) Park Facilities Approx. acres per park Total # of Future (2040) Park Acres Neighborhood Parks 1 5 3 12.5 37.5 Future neighborhood parks are assumed to be town center, bellweather and downtown north park Community Parks 1 8 0 0 0 Exisitng city park estimated at 8 acres per page 73 of the comp plan. Is this going to be considered as a park for the purposes of park dedication? Community Playfields 1 76 0 15 0 Open Space Park 0 0 2 30 60 Future parks are assumed to be the open space parks that are a part of ravinia and bellwether Linear Park 0 0 1 9 9 Totals 89 107 Notes: 1. Approximate acres per park are based on park classification range of acres. 2. This estimate is based on a forecast population of 11,300 by the year 2040. 3. Community playfields include Athletic Search Areas(ASA) as identified on the plan. Parks Inside MUSA # of Parks to develop Unit Cost Facility Cost Approx. acres per park Acres Required Unit Cost Land Cost Neighborhood Parks 3 $533,830 $1,601,490 12.5 37.5 $90,000 $3,375,000 $4,976,490 Community Parks 0 $0 $0 0 0 $90,000 $0 $0 Community Playfields 1 $3,347,700 $3,347,700 0 0 $90,000 $0 $3,347,700 Open Space Park 2 $906,647 $1,813,294 30 60 $90,000 $5,400,000 $7,213,294 Linear Park 1 $533,830 $533,830 9 9 $90,000 $810,000 $1,343,830 $16,881,314 Notes: 1. Land costs: $90,000/acre (MUSA) and $13,000 (Non-MUSA) based on information from surrounding communities and Assessor's Office. Costs of each land parcel will vary depending on location, size and site features. 2. Neighborhood Park Cost Estimate would account for parking, lighting, utilities, picnic shelter, benches, playground, play court, a special amenity such as a mini splash pad, and design fee 3. Community Park Cost Estimate would account for parking, lighting, utilites, picnic shelter, benches, trails, lg. playground, restroom building, and a special amenity such as a hockey rink/performance area and design fee 4. Athletic Complex Park Cost Estimate would account for 3 full size soccer fields, 4 adult softball fields, youth playfields, tennis court, parking, lighting, fencing, utilities/irrigation, trails, picnic shelter/restrooms/concessions, and design fee 5. Community Play Fields Cost Estimate would account for a combination of play fields and courts of softball/soccer/basketball/tennis/volleyball, parking, lighting, restrooms, picnic area, and design fee. 6. Open Space Park Cost Estimate would account for trails, signage, parking, and natural resource enhancements 7. Cost Estimates are based on park improvements costs developed for each park Trails Trails Inside MUSA Qty Unit Cost Facility Cost Acres Required Unit Cost Land Cost Inside MUSA Qty On Road Trail (LF)157,093 $30 $4,712,790 $4,712,790 Off Road Trail (LF)144,800 Off Road Trail (LF)130,320 $30 $3,909,600 60 $90,000 $5,385,124 $9,294,724 Outside MUSA Boardwalk (LF)14,480 $650 $9,412,000 7 $90,000 $598,347 $10,010,347 Off Road Trail (LF)122,109 Overpass (Each)5 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Road Crossings (Each)4 $41,000 $164,000 $164,000 Outside MUSA On Road Trail (LF)184,339 $30 $5,530,170 $5,530,170 Off Road Trail (LF)109,898 $30 $3,296,943 50 $13,000 $655,957 $3,952,900 Boardwalk (LF)12,211 $650 $7,937,085 6 $13,000 $72,884 $8,009,969 Road Crossings (Each)1 $41,000 $41,000 $41,000 $46,715,901 Notes: 2. Trail Costs are based on a 8' bituminous trail with a 20' wide easement 4. Above costs are based on purchased easements. 5. On-road trails assume no acquisition of additional land or easements. 6. Road crossings assume rapid flashing beacon (2 per) and countdown timers on signals (4 per) at an existing signal. 7. On Road trails assume 4-travel lanes to 2 -travel lanes with blackout of existing lines and striping new lines including bicycle lanes. Assumes no signal modifications. 8. Off road trails include associated signage. 9. Costs updated May 2020 using using trail planning estimates developed by Hennepin County and the City of Corcoran. 10. Trail improvement costs came from Hennepin County Ped and Bike Coordinator and the City fo Corcoran Existing Parks 2040 Future Parks 2040 Park Facility Needs Facility Costs Land + Facility Cost 2040 Park Facility + Land Costs Land Cost Grand Total Park + Trail Facility Costs through 2040 CostSystem Item Grand Total Costs Total Park Development Costs to Year 2040 2040 Park Development Costs 2040 Trail Development Costs $16,881,314 $46,715,901 $63,597,215 2040 Trail Facility + Land Costs 1. Land costs: $90,000/acre (MUSA) and $13,000/acre (Non-MUSA) based on information from surrounding communities and Assessor's Office. Costs of each parcel may vary depending on location, size and site features. 3. Trails are based on full development from the 2040 parks and trails map Facility Costs Total Trail Development Costs yo Year 2040 Land + Facility Cost Land Cost 2020-05-05 Park Dedication Calculations 5/14/2020 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 9a. Council Meeting: June 11, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds – Series 2020A Action Required: Approval Summary: At the May 14, 2020 Council meeting, a resolution was approved providing for the issuance and sale of bonds to fund the 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Plan and Southeast Corcoran Watermain Improvement Project. The total issuance was adopted for approximately $2,110,000. In advance of the sale a rating call was held with Moody’s Investor Services who Re-affirmed the City’s rating at Aa3. Attached to this report is a draft resolution awarding the sale of the bonds which will take place the morning of June 11th. It will be updated after the sale. Tammy Omdal of Northland Securities will present the Council with specific information regarding the sale at the meeting. Financial/Budget: The total issuance is approximately $2,110,000 (including cost of issuance, etc) as outlined below: • 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Plan: $840,500 o Paid through debt service levy funded by property taxes • Southeast Corcoran Watermain Improvement Project: $1,200,000 o Paid from revenue from the water fund Options: 1. Approve Resolution 2020-44 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A 2. Decline the sale. Recommendation: Approve Resolution 2020-44 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A Council Action: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 2020-44 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A Attachments: 1. Resolution 2020-44 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, was duly held [in the City Hall in said City] [by teleconference] on Thursday, June 11, 2020, commencing at 7:00 P.M. [The teleconference was held in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.021.] The following members of the Council were present: and the following were absent: * * * * * * * * * The Mayor announced that the next order of business was consideration of the proposals which had been received for the purchase of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A, to be issued in the aggregate principal amount of $____________. The City Administrator presented a tabulation of the proposals that had been received in the manner specified in the Notice of Sale for the Bonds. The proposals are as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached. After due consideration of the proposals, Member ________ then introduced the following written resolution, the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its adoption: CR100-20-655093.v2 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-44 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2020A, IN THE ORIGINAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $__________; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “City”), as follows: Section 1. Sale of Bonds. 1.01. Authorization for Sale of Bonds. Pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on May 14, 2020 (the “Authorizing Resolution”), the City authorized the sale of its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A (the “Bonds”), for the following purposes: (a) to finance the acquisition of the various items of capital equipment as set forth in the Authorizing Resolution (the “Equipment”), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 410.32 and 412.301, as amended (collectively, the “Equipment Financing Act”); and (b) to finance the construction of various improvements to the City’s water utility system (the “Utility Improvements”), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 444 and 475, as amended (collectively, the “Utility Revenue Act”). 1.02. Issuance of General Obligation Bonds. (a) The City Council finds it necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A (the “Bonds”), in the original aggregate principal amount of $__________, pursuant to the Capital Equipment Financing Act and the Utility Revenue Act (collectively, the “Act”), to provide financing for the Equipment and the Utility Improvements. (b) The City is authorized by Section 475.60, subdivision 2(9) of the Act to negotiate the sale of the Bonds, it being determined that the City has retained an independent municipal advisor in connection with such sale. The actions of the City staff and municipal advisor in negotiating the sale of the Bonds are ratified and confirmed in all aspects. 1.03. Award to the Purchaser and Interest Rates. The proposal of __________ (the “Purchaser”) to purchase the Bonds is hereby found and determined to be a reasonable offer and is hereby accepted, the proposal being to purchase the Bonds at a price of $____________ (par amount of $__________, [plus original issue premium of $__________,] [less original issue discount of $_______,] less an underwriter’s discount of $_____________), plus accrued interest, if any, for Bonds bearing interest as follows: CR100-20-655093.v2 3 Year Interest Rate Year Interest Rate 2022 % 2027 % 2023 2028 2024 2029 2025 2030 2026 2031 True interest cost: _________% 1.04. Purchase Contract. The amount proposed by the Purchaser in excess of the minimum bid shall be credited to the accounts in the Debt Service Fund hereinafter created or deposited in the accounts of the Construction Fund hereinafter created, as determined by the City Administrator in consultation with the City’s municipal advisor. The City Administrator is directed to retain the good faith check of the Purchaser, pending completion of the sale of the Bonds. The Mayor and the City Administrator are directed to execute a contract with the Purchaser on behalf of the City. 1.05. Terms and Principal Amounts of the Bonds. The City will forthwith issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to the Act, in the original aggregate principal amount of $____________, originally dated as of July 8, 2020, in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, numbered No. R-1, upward, bearing interest as above set forth, and maturing serially on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Year Amount 2022 2027 2023 2028 2024 2029 2025 2030 2026 2031 (a) $870,000 of the principal amount of the Bonds (the “Equipment Certificates”), maturing on February 1 in the years and in the amounts set forth below, will be used to finance the acquisition of the Equipment: Year Amount Year Amount 2022 2027 2023 2028 2024 2029 2025 2030 2026 (b) The remainder of the principal amount of the Bonds in the amount of $1,440,000 (the “Utility Revenue Bonds”), maturing on February 1 in the years and in the amounts set forth below, will be used to finance the construction of the Utility Improvements: Year Amount Year Amount 2022 2027 2023 2028 2024 2029 2025 2030 2026 2031 CR100-20-655093.v2 4 1.06. Optional Redemption. The City may elect on February 1, 2029, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2030. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC (as defined in Section 7 hereof) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant’s interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. Section 2. Registration and Payment. 2.01. Registered Form. The Bonds will be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 2.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond will be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first interest payment date, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2021, to the registered owners of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City will appoint a bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating agent and paying agent (the “Registrar”). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto are as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar must keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar provides for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of a Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until that interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. When Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar will authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity as requested by the registered owner or the owner ’s attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. Bonds surrendered upon transfer or exchange will be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When a Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the Bond until the Registrar is satisfied that the CR100-20-655093.v2 5 endorsement on the Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar will incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name a Bond is registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of the Bond, whether the Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on the Bond and for all other purposes and payments so made to registered owner or upon the owner’s order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. The Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof for a transfer or exchange of Bonds, sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. If a Bond becomes mutilated or is destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar will deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that the Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it and as provided by law, in which both the City and the Registrar must be named as obligees. Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar will be cancelled by the Registrar and evidence of such cancellation must be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it is not necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Redemption. In the event any of the Bonds are called for redemption, notice thereof identifying the Bonds to be redeemed will be given by the Registrar by mailing a copy of the redemption notice by first class mail (postage prepaid) to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books kept by the Registrar and by publishing the notice if required by law. Failure to give notice by publication or by mail to any registered owner, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of Bonds. Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided that the funds for the redemption are on deposit with the place of payment at that time. 2.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City appoints Northland Trust Services Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with the Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporat ion is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, the resulting corporation is authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar upon 30 days’ notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar must deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and must deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Administrator must transmit to the Registrar monies sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.05. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds will be prepared under the direction of the City Administrator and executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City CR100-20-655093.v2 6 Administrator, provided that those signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be such officer before the delivery of a Bond, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, a Bond will not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on the Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on a Bond is conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Administrator will deliver the same to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser is not obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 3. Form of Bond. 3.01. Execution of the Bonds. The Bonds will be printed or typewritten in substantially the form as attached hereto as EXHIBIT B. 3.02. Approving Legal Opinion. The City Administrator is directed to obtain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and to cause the opinion to be printed on or accompany each Bond. Section 4. Payment; Security; Pledges and Covenants. 4.01. Debt Service Fund. The Bonds will be payable from the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A Debt Service Fund (the “Debt Service Fund”) hereby created. The Debt Service Fund shall be administered and maintained by the City Administrator as a bookkeeping account separate and apart from all other funds maintained in the official financial records of the City. The City will maintain the following accounts in the Debt Service Fund: the “Equipment Account” and the “Utility Improvements Account.” Amounts in the Equipment Account are irrevocably pledged to the Equipment Certificates and amounts in the Utility Improvements Account are irrevocably pledged to the Utility Revenue Bonds. (a) Equipment Account. Ad valorem taxes as hereinafter levied for the Equipment Certificates are hereby pledged to the Equipment Account of the Debt Service Fund. There is also appropriated to the Equipment Account a pro rata portion of (i) capitalized interest financed from Bond proceeds, if any; (ii) accrued interest, if any; and (iii) a pro rata portion of the amounts over the minimum purchase price of the Bonds paid by the Purchaser, to the extent designated for deposit in the Debt Service Fund in accordance with Section 1.04 hereof. (b) Utility Improvements Account. The City will continue to maintain and operate its Water Fund to which will be credited all gross revenues of the water system and out of which will be paid all normal and reasonable expenses of current operations of such system. Any balances therein are deemed net revenues (the “Net Revenues”) and will be transferred, from time to time, to the Utility Improvements Account of the Debt Service Fund, which Utility Improvements Account will be used only to pay principal of and interest on the Utility Revenue Bonds and any other bonds similarly authorized. There will always be retained in the Utility Improvements Account a sufficient amount to pay principal of and interest on all the Utility Revenue Bonds, and the City Administrator must report any current or anticipated deficiency in the Utility Improvements Account to the City Council. There is also appropriated to the Utility Improvements Account (i) a pro rata portion of amounts over the minimum purchase price of the Bonds paid by the Purchaser, to the extent CR100-20-655093.v2 7 designated for deposit in the Debt Service Fund in accordance with Section 1.04 hereof; (ii) accrued interest, if any; and (iii) capitalized interest, if any. 4.02. Construction Fund. The City hereby creates the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A Construction Fund (the “Construction Fund”). The City will maintain the following accounts in the Construction Fund: the “Equipment Account” and the “Utility Improvements Account.” Amounts in the Equipment Account are irrevocably pledged to the Equipment Certificates and amounts in the Utility Improvements Account are irrevocably pledged to the Utility Revenue Bonds. (a) Equipment Account. Proceeds of the Equipment Certificates, less the appropriations made in Section 4.01(a) hereof, together with any other funds appropriated for the purchase of the Equipment, will be deposited in the Equipment Account of the Construction Fund to be used solely to defray expenses of the acquisition of the Equipment. When the Equipment is purchased and the cost thereof paid, the Equipment Account is to be closed and any monies remaining therein shall be transferred to the Equipment Account of the Debt Service Fund. (b) Utility Improvements Account. Proceeds of the Utility Revenue Bonds, less the appropriations made in Section 4.01(b) hereof, will be deposited in the Utility Improvements Account of the Construction Fund to be used solely to defray expenses of the Utility Improvements. When the Utility Improvements are completed and the cost thereof paid, the Utility Improvements Account of the Construction Fund is to be closed and any funds remaining may be deposited in the Utility Improvements Account of the Debt Service Fund. 4.03. City Covenants with Respect to the Utility Revenue Bonds. The City Council covenants and agrees with the holders of the Bonds that so long as any of the Bonds remain outstanding and unpaid, it will keep and enforce the following covenants and agreements: (a) The City will continue to maintain and efficiently operate the water system as a public utility and convenience free from competition of other like municipal utilities and will cause all revenues therefrom to be deposited in a bank account and credited to the Water Fund, as hereinabove provided, and will make no expenditures from that account except for a duly authorized purpose and in accordance with this resolution. (b) The City will also maintain the Utility Improvements Account of the Debt Service Fund as a separate account and will cause money to be credited thereto from time to time, out of Net Revenues from the water system in sums sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the Utility Revenue Bonds when due. (c) The City will keep and maintain proper and adequate books of records and accounts separate from all other records of the City in which will be complete and correct entries as to all transactions relating to the water system and which will be open to inspection and copying by any Bondholder, or the Bondholder’s agent or attorney, at any reasonable time, and it will furnish certified transcripts therefrom upon request and upon payment of a reasonable fee therefor, and said account will be audited at least annually by a qualified public accountant and statements of such audit and report will be furnished to all Bondholders upon request. (d) The City Council will cause persons handling revenues of the water system to be bonded in reasonable amounts for the protection of the City and the Bondholders and will cause the funds collected on account of the operations of such system to be deposited in a bank whose deposits are guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Law. CR100-20-655093.v2 8 (e) The City Council will keep the water system insured at all times against loss by fire, tornado and other risks customarily insured against with an insurer or insurers in good standing, in such amounts as are customary for like plants, to protect the holders, from time to time, of the Bonds and the City from any loss due to any such casualty and will apply the proceeds of such insurance to make good any such loss. (f) The City and each and all of its officers will punctually perform all duties with reference to the water system as required by law. (g) The City will impose and collect charges of the nature authorized by Section 444.075 of the Act, at the times and in the amounts required to produce Net Revenues adequate to pay all principal and interest when due on the Utility Revenue Bonds and to create and maintain such reserves securing said payments as may be provided herein. (h) The City Council will levy general ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City when required to meet any deficiency in Net Revenues. 4.04. General Obligation Pledge. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds, as the same respectively become due, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City will be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. If the balance in the Debt Service Fund is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on the Bonds and any other bonds payable therefrom, the deficiency will be promptly paid out of monies in the general fund of the City which are available for such purpose, and such general fund may be reimbursed with or without interest from the Debt Service Fund when a sufficient balance is available therein. 4.05. Pledge of Tax Levy. For the purpose of paying all or a portion of the principal of and interest on the Equipment Certificates, there is levied a direct annual irrepealable ad valorem tax (the “Taxes”) upon all of the taxable property in the City, which will be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general taxes of the City. The Taxes will be credited to the Equipment Account of the Debt Service Fund above provided and will be in the years and amounts as attached hereto as EXHIBIT C. 4.06. Certification to County Taxpayer Services Division Manager as to Debt Service Fund Amount. It is hereby determined that the estimated collections of Taxes and Net Revenues will produce at least five percent (5%) in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds. The tax levy herein provided is irrepealable until all of the Bonds are paid, provided that at the time the City makes its annual tax levies the City Administrator may certify to the Taxpayer Services Division Manager of Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “County Taxpayer Services Division Manager”) the amount available in the Debt Service Fund to pay principal and interest due during the ensuing year, and the Taxpayer Services Division Manager will thereupon reduce the levy collectible during such year by the amount so certified. 4.07. Filing of Resolution. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Taxpayer Services Division Manager and to obtain the certificate required by Section 475.63 of the Act. Section 5. Authentication of Transcript. 5.01. City Proceedings and Records. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the CR100-20-655093.v2 9 City, and such other certificates, affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in their custody and under their control, relating to the validity and marketability of the Bonds, and such instruments, including any heretofore furnished, will be deemed representations of the City as to the facts stated therein. 5.02. Certification as to Official Statement. The Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the Official Statement prepared and circulated in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Official Statement is a complete and accurate representation of the facts and representations made therein as of the date of the Official Statement. 5.03. Other Certificates. The Mayor and the City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to furnish to the Purchaser at the closing such certificates as are req uired as a condition of sale. Unless litigation shall have been commenced and be pending questioning the Bonds or the organization of the City or incumbency of its officers, at the closing the Mayor and the City Administrator shall also execute and deliver to the Purchaser a suitable certificate as to absence of material litigation, and the City Administrator shall also execute and deliver a certificate as to payment for and delivery of the Bonds. 5.04. Electronic Signatures. The electronic signature of the Mayor and/or the City Administrator to this resolution and to any certificate authorized to be executed hereunder shall be as valid as an original signature of such party and shall be effective to bind the City thereto. For purposes hereof, (i) “electronic signature” means a manually signed original signature that is then transmitted by electronic means; and (ii) “transmitted by electronic means” means sent in the form of a facsimile or sent via the internet as a portable document format (“pdf”) or other replicating image attached to an electronic mail or internet message. Section 6. Tax Covenants. 6.01. Tax-Exempt Bonds. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the Bonds. 6.02. No Rebate Required. For purposes of qualifying for the small issuer exception to the federal arbitrage rebate requirements with respect to the Bonds, the City hereby finds, determines, and declares that the aggregate face amount of all tax-exempt bonds (other than private activity bonds) issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued and outstanding at one time is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000, all within the meaning of Section 148(f)(4)(D) of the Code. 6.03. Not Private Activity Bonds. The City further covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to cause or permit them or any of them to be used, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be “private activity bonds” within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 6.04. Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations. In order to qualify the Bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: CR100-20-655093.v2 10 (a) the Bonds are not “private activity bonds” as defined in Section 141 of the Code; (b) the City hereby designates the Bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than any private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2020 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2020 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. 6.05. Procedural Requirements. The City will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. Section 7. Book-Entry System; Limited Obligation of City. 7.01. The Depository Trust Company. The Bonds will be initially issued in the form of a separate single typewritten or printed fully registered Bond for each of the maturities set forth in Section 1.05 hereof. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of each Bond will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns (“DTC”). Except as provided in this section, all of the outstanding Bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. 7.02. Participants. With respect to Bonds registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent will have no responsibility or obligation to any broker dealers, banks and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository (the “Participants”) or to any other person on behalf of which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds, including but not limited to any responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any Participant or any other person (other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown by the registration books kept by the Registrar) of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of Bonds, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar as the holder and absolute owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal, premium and interest with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all other purposes. The Paying Agent will pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or on the order of the respective registered owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, and all such payments will be valid and effectual to fully satisfy and discharge the City’s obligations with respect to payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, will receive a certificated Bond evidencing the obligation of this resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the City Administrator of a written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the words “Cede & Co.” will refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt of such a notice, the City Administrator will promptly deliver a copy of the same to the Registrar and Paying Agent. CR100-20-655093.v2 11 7.03. Representation Letter. The City has heretofore executed and delivered to DTC a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations (the “Representation Letter”) which shall govern payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and notices with respect to the Bonds. Any Paying Agent or Registrar subsequently appointed by the City with respect to the Bonds will agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the City in the Representation Letter with respect to the Registrar and Paying Agent, respectively, to be complied with at all times. 7.04. Transfers Outside Book-Entry System. In the event the City, by resolution of the City Council, determines that it is in the best interests of the persons having beneficial interests in the Bonds that they be able to obtain Bond certificates, the City will notify DTC, whereupon DTC will notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of Bond certificates. In such event the City will issue, transfer and exchange Bond certificates as requested by DTC and any other registered owners in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event, if no successor securities depository is appointed, the City will issue and the Registrar will authenticate Bond certificates in accordance with this resolution and the provisions hereof will apply to the transfer, exchange and method of payment thereof. 7.05. Payments to Cede & Co. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution to the contrary, so long as a Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond will be made and given, respectively in the manner provided in DTC’s Operational Arrangements, as set forth in the Representation Letter. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. 8.01. Execution of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. “Continuing Disclosure Certificate” means that certain Continuing Disclosure Certificate executed by the Mayor and the City Administrator and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof. 8.02. City Compliance with Provisions of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, failure of the City to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Certificate is not to be considered an event of default with respect to the Bonds; however, any Bondholder may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this section. Section 9. Defeasance. When all Bonds and all interest thereon have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds will cease, except that the pledge of the full faith and credit of the City for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will remain in full force and effect. The City may discharge all Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full. If any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.) CR100-20-655093.v2 12 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member _________________________, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CR100-20-655093.v2 A-1 EXHIBIT A PROPOSALS CR100-20-655093.v2 B-1 EXHIBIT B FORM OF BOND No. R-_____ $________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF CORCORAN GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND SERIES 2020A Rate Maturity Date of Original Issue CUSIP February 1, 20__ July 8, 2020 Registered Owner: CEDE & CO. The City of Corcoran, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing municipal corporation in Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “City”), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above or registered assigns, the principal sum of $__________ on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2021, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by Northland Trust Services Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Paying Agent, Transfer Agent and Authenticating Agent, or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. The City may elect on February 1, 2029, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2030. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant’s interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $__________ all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, interest rate, and redemption privilege, all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on June 11, 2020 (the “Resolution”), for the purpose of providing money to defray the expenses incurred and to be incurred in the acquisition of items of capital equipment and improvements to the water system of the City, pursuant to and in full conformity with the home rule charter of the City and the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 444, and 475, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 410.32 and 412.301, as amended, and the principal hereof and interest hereon are payable from ad valorem taxes and net revenues of the water system of the City, as set forth in the Resolution to which reference is made for a full statement of rights and powers thereby conferred. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for CR100-20-655093.v2 B-2 payment of this Bond and the City Council has obligated itself to levy additional ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City in the event of any deficiency in ad valorem taxes and net revenues pledged, which taxes may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. The City Council has designated the issue of Bonds of which this Bond forms a part as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limit allowed by the Code for the calendar year of issue. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that in and by the Resolution, the City has covenanted and agreed that it will continue to own and operate the water system free from competition by other like municipal utilities; that adequate insurance on said system and suitable fidelity bonds on employees will be carried; that proper and adequate books of account will be kept showing all receipts and disbursements relating to the Water Fund, into which it will pay all of the gross revenues from the water system; that it will also create and maintain a Utility Improvements Account within the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A Debt Service Fund, into which it will pay, out of the net revenues from the water system a sum sufficient to pay principal of the Utility Revenue Bonds (as defined in the Resolution) and interest on the Utility Revenue Bonds when due; and that it will provide, by ad valorem tax levies, for any deficiency in required net revenues of the water system. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner’s attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of ot her authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar will be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the home rule charter of the City and the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required, and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional, statutory, or charter limitation of indebtedness. This Bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile or man ual signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. CR100-20-655093.v2 B-3 Dated: July 8, 2020 CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA (Facsimile) (Facsimile) Mayor City Administrator _________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICES INC. By Authorized Representative _________________________________ ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, will be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT _________ Custodian _________ (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by entireties under Uniform Gifts or Transfers to Minors Act, State of _______________ JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ________________________________________ ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ________________________________________ the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint _________________________ attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: CR100-20-655093.v2 B-4 Notice: The assignor’s signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a financial institution that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program (“STAMP”), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program (“SEMP”), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signatures Program (“MSP”) or other such “signature guarantee program” as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, SEMP or MSP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Bond Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the information concerning the assignee requested below is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if this Bond is held by joint account.) Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the principal of and interest on the within Bond has been registered on the books of the Registrar in the name of the person last noted below. Date of Registration Registered Owner Signature of Officer of Registrar Cede & Co. Federal ID #13-2555119 C-1 CR100-20-655093.v2 EXHIBIT C TAX LEVY SCHEDULE Tax Levy for Equipment Certificates Year* Amount 2021 $ 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 _______________________________ * Collection Year CR100-20-655093.v2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. ) CITY OF CORCORAN ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Administrator of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the “City”), do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on June 11, 2020, with the original minutes on file in my office and the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $__________. WITNESS My hand officially as such City Administrator and the corporate seal of the City this ______ day of June, 2020. City Administrator City of Corcoran, Minnesota (SEAL) CR100-20-655093.v2 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CERTIFICATE OF TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER AS TO TAX LEVY AND REGISTRATION I, the undersigned Taxpayer Services Division Manager of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certify that a certified copy of a resolution adopted by the governing body of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the “City”), on June 11, 2020, levying taxes for the payment of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A, issued in the original aggregate principal amount of $__________ dated as of July 8, 2020, has been filed in my office and said bonds have been entered on the register of obligations in my office and that such tax has been levied as required by law. WITNESS My hand and official seal this _____ day of __________, 2020. Taxpayer Services Division Manager Hennepin County, Minnesota (SEAL) Deputy County Auditor STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 9b. Council Meeting: June 11, 2020 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson Topic: Hackamore Road Improvements – 30% Design Review Action Required: Approval Summary: Planning for street improvements to Hackamore Road are underway along the border of Corcoran and Medina. The existing road is reaching its life expectancy and increasing transportation demands as a result of development activity continue to impact the corridor. At the February 27th meeting, council approved a proposal from WSB to complete engineering services for two 30% street design layout options and a 75% design. A virtual Open House meeting for adjacent property owners was held on May 19th. Approximately 20 residents participated in the event with preliminary feedback given related to the increased traffic potential, future development in the area, and drainage concerns. The comments received to date are included on pages 69-70 of the attached engineering memorandum. Any additional comments received prior to the June 11th council meeting will be provided to the council in advance. Option 1 – Three Lane Design with Continuous Center Turn Lane • Improves safety with dedicated turn lanes and pedestrian facilities • Provides flexibility to accommodate unknown street access points • Facilitates adjacent development traffic • Larger footprint; more expensive Option 2 – Two Lane Design with Right and Left Turn Lanes • Improves safety with dedicated turn lanes and pedestrian facilities • Minimizes adjacent impacts • More shifts to the roadway and trail alignments • Narrower street widths in some locations; less costly Based on the information provided in the engineering memorandum and staff input from both cities, it is our recommendation Option 2 be pursued for 75% design. This option is less costly while maintaining beneficial corridor improvements to accommodate current and future traffic levels. Proceeding with a 75% design will provide the opportunity for the cities to refine costs, analyze funding mechanisms, and complete a cohesive plan guiding the transportation needs, right-of-way, and pedestrian mobility of this corridor. Page 2 Financial/Budget: The cost to provide the engineering design services will be shared 50/50 by the cities of Corcoran and Medina. Corcoran will pay for its portion of the engineering design services with funds received from developer contributions. Options: 1. Approve street design layout Option 2 and authorize WSB to proceed with the completion of a 75% design. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Approve street design layout Option 2 and authorize WSB to proceed with completion of a 75% design. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve street design layout Option 2 and authorize WSB to proceed with completion of a 75% design. Attachments: 1. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – 30% Design Memorandum K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Honorable Mayors and City Councils City of Corcoran City of Medina From: Jim Stremel, PE - Senior Project Manager Date: June 4, 2020 Re: Hackamore Road Improvement Project – 30% Design WSB Project No. R-015661-000 Project Scope & Background The Hackamore Road Improvement Project, extending from Medina Lake Drive to the approach of Brockton Lane N (CR 101), was initiated jointly by the City of Corcoran and the City of Medina. The project was not only initiated to address deteriorating and insufficient infrastructure, but to develop a cohesive plan that both cities can provide to adjacent property owners and developers to guide transportation needs, right-of-way, and pedestrian mobility in the area. At the current 30% level of design, two alternates for the roadway, trail, and intersection controls were developed. The intent of this report is to outline the process and development of the two design alternatives, necessary intersection controls, stormwater management needs, potential impacts of the two design alternatives, and to consider the next steps with the project development. Information and materials used in the preparation of this report were collected from the City of Corcoran, City of Medina, Hennepin County, MnDOT, and other impacted agencies. This data included: · Existing and historic traffic volume data · Current crash history · Proposed and anticipated development plans · As-built roadway plans · Survey/topographic data previously obtained or readily available · Wetland and floodplain locations from available delineations, GIS, or other mapping · Property Owner and Stakeholder engagement data · City franchise agreements with private utility companies · Soil borings and geotechnical report by Haugo Geotechnical Services, June 2019 Existing Conditions The proposed improvement project extends from Medina Lake Drive to the intersection at Brockton Lane N (CR 101) and the westerly intersection approach on CR 47 (Hackamore Road). The existing Hackamore Road is currently a 24-foot wide, bituminous paved rural section; no pedestrian facilities exist along this section of roadway. The alignment of the roadway is generally straight with no horizontal curves. The current posted speed is 40 MPH in both directions. Based on a 40 MPH speed, a vertical curve on the easterly portion of the project (the westerly approach to CR 101) is deficient and does not provide the required sight distance. Pavements in the study area are aging and experiencing differing severities of stresses including alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking, and transverse cracking. Areas of isolated pavement Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 2 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx settlement also exist throughout the project area. For additional information, the Geotechnical Exploration Report, by Haugo Geotechnical Services in June 2019, is included in Appendix C. Currently, there is not a storm sewer collection system within Hackamore Road. The existing roadway is a rural section road with ditches along a majority of the length of the roadway. Driveway culverts are present at existing driveway approaches to the road. Additionally, there are 4 culverts that convey drainage across the roadway. There are existing drainage issues that have been identified both by residents and engineering observation and analysis with 30% design. Specifically, there is a low point in the corridor to the west of Hackamore Circle. This drainage issue may involve working with adjacent property owners to determine if property is available for stormwater management. Other areas of concerns will be reviewed in more detail with 75% design. There are no existing sanitary sewer systems within Hackamore Road. There is an existing 8” PVC watermain section located along the south side of Hackamore in the boulevard between Hunter Drive and Bergamot Drive with a crossing to Corcoran at Bergamot Drive for use as an emergency interconnection. Existing traffic volume data for the primary intersections was collected based on traffic counts conducted the week of March 9, 2020. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. The existing 2020 peak hour and average daily traffic (ADT) traffic counts for the corridor are shown on the attached figure in Appendix B and used for the traffic forecasting and operations analysis in this report. Traffic Forecasting Analysis In order to analyze the lane configuration and traffic control needs in the corridor, traffic forecasts were prepared for the twenty-year design (year 2040) condition, representing the full development of the area. 2040 traffic volumes were determined for the project by projecting the existing 2020 traffic counts to the 2040 design year. The projections included: · Background traffic growth of 1% / year. · Estimating the traffic volume from the current adjacent development that is yet to be completed. · Estimating the traffic volumes from proposed future development in the corridor. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed area traffic is based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The projected 2040 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, assuming full development of the area traffic, are shown on the attached figure in Appendix B. Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations analysis was completed by evaluating the existing and projected traffic operations for the Hackamore Road project area, including the intersections of: · Medina Lake Drive / Future Development Access · Foxberry Drive · Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) · Future Development Access · Hunter Road / Future Development Access · Bergamot Drive / Steeple Chase Lane Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 3 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx · Proposed Development Access (Church) · Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) The intersections in the corridor were evaluated during the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro/SimTraffic micro simulation software. The results are derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The software was used to evaluate the characteristics of the roadway network including lane geometrics, turning movement volumes, traffic control, and signal timing. The results of the operations analysis are shown below in Table 1 (Existing Conditions), Table 2 (2040 without any improvements), and Table 3 (2040 with proposed improvements). Table 1 – Existing 2020 Level of Service and Delay Summary Control Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Medina Lake Dr A (A) 1 (2) A (A) 1 (2) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Foxberry Dr A (A) 1 (3) A (A) 1 (4) Signal Hackamore Rd at Pinto Dr (CSAH 116) A (B) 6 (13) A (B) 9 (17) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Hunter Rd A (A) 1 (4) A (A) 1 (4) Thru- Stop Hackamore Rd at Bergamot Dr/Steeple Chase Ln A (A) 1 (5) A (A) 2 (7) Signal Hackamore Rd at Brockton Ln (CSAH 101) B (C 11 (22) B (C) 12 (21) X (X) – Overall LOS or Delay (Worst Movement LOS or Delay) Table 2 – Projected 2040 Level of Service and Delay Summary without Improvements Control Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Medina Lake Dr/Future Development Access A (A) 3 (9) A (B) 3 (11) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Foxberry Dr A (A) 1 (4) A (A) 2 (5) Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 4 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx Signal Hackamore Rd at Pinto Dr (CSAH 116) C (D) 21 (38) C (D) 23 (44) Thru- Stop Hackamore Rd at Future Development Access A (A) 3 (7) A (A) 4 (8) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Hunter Rd / Future Development Access A (A) 4 (8) A (A) 4 (9) Thru- Stop Hackamore Rd at Bergamot Dr/Steeple Chase Ln A (A) 3 (9) A (A) 4 (9) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Future Development Access (Church) A (A) 3 (7) A (A) 2 (6) Signal Hackamore Rd at Brockton Ln (CSAH 101) C (E) 29 (56) C (D) 25 (47) X (X) – Overall LOS or Delay (Worst Movement LOS or Delay) Table 3 – Projected 2040 Level of Service and Delay Summary with Improvements Control Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Medina Lake Dr/Future Development Access A (A) 2 (7) A (A) 3 (8) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Foxberry Dr A (A) 1 (3) A (A) 2 (4) Signal Hackamore Rd at Pinto Dr (CSAH 116) B (C) 10 (21) B (C) 15 (27) Thru- Stop Hackamore Rd at Future Development Access A (A) 2 (6) A (A) 3 (6) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Hunter Rd / Future Development Access A (A) 2 (7) A (A) 2 (8) Thru- Stop Hackamore Rd at Bergamot Dr/Steeple Chase Ln A (A) 2 (6) A (A) 2 (7) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Future Development Access (Church) A (A) 2 (5) A (A) 1 (4) Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 5 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx Signal Hackamore Rd at Brockton Ln (CSAH 101) B (C) 17 (28) B (C) 16 (26) X (X) – Overall LOS or Delay (Worst Movement LOS or Delay) Turn Lane Analysis Based on the Forecasted 2040 traffic conditions a turn lane analysis was completed for the primary intersections in project area. The analysis was conducted to determine the turn lanes needed to accommodate the existing and future development on Hackamore Road. Criteria and guidance reviewed included: · MnDOT Road Design Manual · MnDOT Access Management Manual · MnDOT / LRRB (Local Road Research Board) Research Report 2008-14: Turn Lane Lengths for Various Speed Road and Evaluation of Determining Criteria · NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study The full turn lane analysis report can be found in Appendix B and graphically shown in the project exhibits in Appendix A. Proposed Improvements Road Geometric Comparisons: Based on the traffic forecast and analysis, two geometric concept plans were developed based on a 40 MPH design speed that included the recommended geometric improvements, preliminary intersection control design, and right-of-way needs. Figures have been attached to this memo for reference. The proposed improvements, for both alternatives, would include roadway reclamation, subbase reconstruction, intersection improvements, and trail construction on the north side of Hackamore Road. The roadway would remain a predominately rural section. Curb and gutter is proposed for locations needing additional drainage direction, where the trail will be at the back of curb to decrease the overall roadway width, and at the intersections with CR 116 and CR 101. In general, Option 2 proposes more curb due to the proximity of the trail and to implement other impact-minimizing measures. · Option 1: This option is comprised of a continuous center left turn lane, right turn lanes at designated intersections, and one through lane in each direction. The trail location tends to deviate further away from the edge of roadway with a wider boulevard. · Option 2: The second option includes dedicated left and right turn lanes as necessary, and one through lane in each direction. The trail location is generally close to (with minimum boulevard) or abutting the edge of the roadway. With this option, any necessary widening of the roadway near Hackamore Circle to accommodate future development would be the responsibility of the developer. Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 6 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx Hackamore Road is a designated State Aid roadway. The existing roadway alignment meets all horizontal curve requirements but does not meet the vertical curve requirements at the east end of the project on the westerly approach to CR 101 for a 40 MPH posted speed limit. In order to meet State Aid requirements, the proposed design would lengthen this vertical curve, which would require significant grading to lower the elevation by approximately 2-3 feet. The options are included with Figures 1A-F located in Appendix A for comparison. Trail Improvements: Currently, there are no pedestrian facilities within the project area. However, pedestrian facilities do exist in the northeast quadrant of the Brockton Lane N intersection extending to the north, and in the southwest quadrant extending to the south. The proposed pedestrian improvements on Hackamore Road extend the full length of the project area from Medina Lake Drive to Brockton Lane N (CR 101), in both Option 1 and Option 2. The proposed bituminous trail is 8-feet wide with a boulevard of varying width. Where the trail is adjacent to the roadway or at back of curb, the trail will be 10-feet wide. The use of retaining walls for the adjacent trail section maybe necessary if constructed, as shown in Option 2, due to the increase in side-slopes from this correction. The location of the proposed trail in Option 1 extends further north from Hackamore Road in the areas were adjacent development is planned. With this design, the trail could potentially be constructed as part of the site development at a time in the future. With this in mind, the construction of the pedestrian facilities would be delayed until the time that development occurs, but the cost of the trail would likely be included as a part of the overall development improvements. In Option 2, the trail is located adjacent to the roadway boulevard or at the back of curb throughout the corridor and would be constructed in conjunction with the roadway project. This option reduces impacts to adjacent properties and wetlands and would have more immediate pedestrian accessibility, however the cities would bear the cost of the trail with the project initially. With either trail option, crossing improvements would be installed at both CR 116 and CR 101, including push buttons on the signals and crosswalk markings. An uncontrolled pedestrian crossing is being considered between Hunter Drive and Bergamot Drive. The final determination of the crossing location will be made during final design in consideration of the location of the future development accesses to the south of Hackamore Road. East of the intersection between Hackamore Road and CR 101, trail improvements are shown on the north and south side of CR 47 (Hackamore Road). These trails are not included in the proposed improvement costs but are shown in the Figures for reference to indicate potential future connection points for the proposed trail on Hackamore Road. Intersection Improvements: In addition to the improvements on Hackamore Road, turn lane and intersection improvements are proposed on CR 116 and CR 101. Right turn lanes on CR 116 are proposed on the northbound and southbound directions to accommodate additional vehicular operations; additional northbound or southbound turn lanes on CR 101 are not proposed. Signal improvements at both Hennepin County intersections will be necessary due to the widening of Hackamore Road and the addition of improved pedestrian crossings. A second design option was developed at CR 116 which shifts the proposed intersection north to limit the impact to a significant wetland on the southeast quadrant of the roadway. The shift in alignment north also limits the impact to a large elevated transformer and provides space to accommodate the signal control panel at or near the existing location. Figure 3 showing these intersection alternatives can be found in Appendix A. Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 7 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx Roadway reconstruction is also proposed for the CR 47 approach to Hackamore Road, east of CR 101, to accommodate the revised traffic pattern and turn lanes. The City of Plymouth is currently working on a larger CR 47 corridor study as a part of the future turn-back process with Hennepin County, which include improvements up to CR 101. Further refinement of this approach will be needed with 75% design to determine the most efficient way to accommodate the Hackamore Road improvements from the west to the east side of the intersection. Project Phasing: With both alignment options, the proposed street reconstruction is split into three phases. Phase 1 extends between CR 101 and the western boundary of the Steeple Chase Development (Ravinia), Phase 2 from the western boundary of the Steeple Chase Development to the western boundary of 565 Hackamore Road, and Phase 3 from the western boundary of 565 Hackamore Road to Medina Lake Drive. Phase 1 was determined based on factors including condition of the roadway pavements, the deficient vertical curve near CR 101, and that most development has occurred within this portion of Hackamore Road. Development within Phase 2 and 3 is either in the early stages or has not proceeded fully. Therefore, the location of intersections and infrastructure needs are not fully known. Proposed Phase 1 construction would occur during the 2021 season, and Phase 2 and 3 would follow as early as the 2022 and 2024 construction seasons based on the progress of adjacent developments. Street/Pavement Section: Two 10-ton street sections were proposed within the geotechnical report previously completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services in 2019. The first recommended section consisted of 6 ½ inches of bituminous over 18 inches of aggregate base, the second section consisted of 6 inches of bituminous, 10 inches of aggregate base, and 18 inches of select granular borrow sub-base. Both meet the granular equivalency requirements for the project. For cost estimations at 30% design, the second section was used. This is the more costly option for street section, when compared to the section without a select granular borrow sub-base. During final design, either a combination of both sections (depending on the prevailing underlying soil conditions) or the first street section could be used to reduce the overall roadway costs of the project. The soil borings also indicated poor underlying soil conditions in numerous areas of the project. The resulting geotechnical analysis recommended removing these soils and replacing them with granular materials, which is included with the cost estimates. The full report is included in Appendix C. Sanitary Sewer & Watermain: There are no sanitary sewer or watermain improvements proposed as part of this project. The City of Corcoran is planning a watermain looping connection as a separate project and will plan for a utility corridor with the Hackamore Project. Right-of-Way Considerations: Additional right-of-way will need to be acquired for the widening of Hackamore Road, as well as the installation of pedestrian facilities on the north side of the roadway. The right-of-way needed varies between the proposed design options, but in each case the width has been minimized through the alignment and location of the trail and boulevard widths. The figures in Appendix A also show the potential permanent right-of-way impacts. Stormwater Management & Floodplain Impacts: Storm sewer improvements will likely include a combination of ditch systems, storm piping systems within the curbed sections, and stormwater treatment areas to capture and retain storm Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 8 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx sewer in accordance with the cities and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC). Impacts to the 100-yr floodplains are not anticipated with this project. This project will require an ECWMC permit. A pre-application meeting with held with ECWMC and the Cities of Medina and Corcoran on April 23, 2020. In the meeting, stormwater best management practices (BMPs) were discussed. This project will trigger ECWMC stormwater management rules requiring rate and volume control off of the net increase of impervious surface. Due to limited right-of-way areas and the project’s phased approach, the cities discussed flexibility with BMP construction with the watershed. It is the Cities’ preference for adjacent developments to construct BMPs as they occur along the corridor. ECWMC was open to this idea. Additionally, it was discussed that the BMPs will be sized to capture and treat the net increase of impervious surface. While some BMPs may capture existing and new impervious, some new impervious may not be able to be captured and treated prior to discharge from the site. ECWMC was amenable to this approach. It was discussed that an agreement may be drafted that would allow for timing flexibility for the cities to construct the BMPs in such case that development doesn’t occur as expected. Adjacent development on the north side of Hackamore Road in the City of Corcoran may provide a significant opportunity for the cities to share stormwater management BMP’s. This would all but eliminate the need to provide rate control or other large treatment areas in Phase 1 of the project within the Hackamore public right-of-way. Additionally, there is potential for adjacent development along the western portion of the corridor in Phase 2 and 3. These developments could construct their stormwater management systems to accommodate the road drainage. Rate control will be provided to manage runoff from the site improvements. The corridor has two main drainage areas. The first area drains to a ditch northwest of the intersection of Hackamore and CR116 the second area drains to a wetland southeast of the intersection of Hackamore and CR101. BMPs will be constructed to maintain runoff rates to these discharge points. Volume control of 1.1” off net new impervious surface will be provided within the constructed BMPs. Soils onsite are not conducive to infiltration so alternative sequencing practices will be provided to achieve the required retention volume. Permits/Approvals This project as proposed will result in disturbing more than one acre of underlying subgrade material, and therefore, a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will be required. A permit from ECWMC will also be required for the stormwater management and erosion control aspects of this project. A permit from Hennepin County will also be needed for the work within the county right-of-way on both CR 101 and CR 116. If the cities propose to utilize State Aid funds, plan review and approval will also be required by MnDOT. Wetland impacts will occur as a result of the project. The project will require permitting through the Wetland Conservation Act, US Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Natural Resources, and ECWMC. Permit applications will be prepared after the 75% design is complete. Mitigation for wetland impacts will be required at a 2:1 ratio. The Board of Water and Soil Resources’ Local Road Replacement Program will be reviewed to determine if the project meets the requirements for replacement. For any impacts that do not meet the requirements, mitigation is recommended through the purchase of wetland credits as it is more cost-effective than onsite mitigation. In addition, there is little to no upland available within the existing right-of-way so onsite mitigation would need to be identified in an adjacent development. Private Utilities There are private utilities currently located within the proposed project area. Known utility owners include: Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 9 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx · CenturyLink [Telephone] · Comcast [Internet/Television] · Wright Hennepin Coop [Communications] · CenterPoint Energy [Gas] · Xcel Energy [Gas/Electric] · Arvig [Fiber] · Mediacom [Fiber] · Zayo Group [Fiber] The roadway impacts to private utilities have been minimized to the greatest extent possible, but relocations will be necessary for utility poles and potentially some underground infrastructure. Known utility owners have been notified of the proposed improvements. Once a final design alternative is selected, further coordination efforts will be conducted with 75% design. The utility relocations are primarily needed to meet the State Aid requirement of a minimum 10- foot clear zone, measured from the edge of the outside through-traffic lane; Hackamore Road is classified as a “Suburban Undivided” roadway. A significant number of utility poles and sections of the existing gas main at the edge of the existing roadway do not meet the current clear zone requirements and will be in direct conflict with the trail, roadway, or proposed clear zone. Between the two options, Option 2 has somewhat fewer utility impacts due to the narrower footprint of the roadway and the trail being located at the back of curb in more locations. For both options, utility poles will likely need to be relocated to the far side of the trail. Project Cost Estimates & Funding Opinion of Probable Cost: Detailed opinions of probable cost for both options can be found in Appendix D of this report. Each opinion of probable cost incorporates estimated 2021 construction costs and includes a 10% construction contingency factor. Indirect costs are projected at 25% of the construction cost and include engineering, legal, financing, and administrative costs. The table below provides a summary of the opinions of probable cost for the options under consideration. Table 2: Estimated Project Cost Summary Description Option 1 - Estimated Project Cost Option 2 - Estimated Project Cost Phase 1 Street Improvements $ 1,710,000.00 $ 1,519,000.00 Trail Improvements $ 221,000.00 $ 227,000.00 Wetland Mitigation $ 26,166.00 $ 11,430.00 Stormwater Management Improvements $ 367,000.00 $ 357,000.00 CR 47 Approach Improvements $ 387,000.00 $ 387,000.00 CR 101 Signal Improvements $ 505,000.00 $ 505,000.00 Sub-Total for Phase 1 $ 3,216,166.00 $ 3,006,430.00 Phase 2 & 3 Street Improvements $ 2,278,000.00 $ 2,012,000.00 Trail Improvements $ 256,000.00 $ 263,000.00 Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 10 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx Wetland Mitigation $ 104,316.00 $ 71,394.00 Stormwater Management Improvements $ 481,000.00 $ 453,000.00 CR 116 Signal Improvements $ 505,000.00 $ 505,000.00 CR 116 North Turn Lanes Improvements $ 76,000.00 $ 76,000.00 CR 116 South Turn Lanes Improvements $ 83,000.00 $ 82,000.00 Sub-Total for Phase 2 & 3 $ 3,783,316.00 $ 3,462,394.00 Grand Total for Project $ 6,999,482.00 $ 6,468,824.00 The above costs in Table 2 are estimated costs for roadway, storm sewer, stormwater improvements, and minor utility impacts for both alternatives. At this time, costs have not been reduced in consideration of the potential for adjacent development to share in the cost of trail and stormwater management improvements. The cost to obtain right-of-way for the proposed improvements were not included with the project estimates; in most cases it has been assumed that adjacent property owners would provide the necessary right-of-way with future development. With that said, there are locations along the corridor where right-of-way may need to be purchased from existing single-family owners to accommodate trail and stormwater improvements. Further refinement of the right-of-way costs will be determined at 75% design. The cost to mitigate disturbed wetland areas were also included where pertinent; it was assumed mitigation will occur through the purchase of wetland credits and not onsite mitigation. No contingency or overhead were included with the cost of the wetland credits. Potential Project Funding: Funding for the Hackamore Road improvements is proposed to come from a combination of City of Medina and City of Corcoran funds, State Aid funding, and cost sharing agreements. Special assessments to benefiting single-family property owners are not being proposed by either city at this time. Potential cost sharing agreement partners include Hennepin County for the work within the county road intersections and signals at CR 116 and CR 101. There is also a cost share opportunity for the portion of CR 47 east of CR 101 with Hennepin County, cities of Plymouth and Maple Grove. More in depth funding divisions will be determined during the 75% Design Phase based on cost sharing agreements and development progression. Community Engagement & Agency Coordination Meeting with Adjacent Cities & Hennepin County: City engineering staff met with the City of Plymouth, City of Maple Grove, and Hennepin County to discuss proposed improvements along Hackamore Road. The most critical portions of the project with respect to these agencies are the intersections at CR 116, CR 101, and that portion of CR 47 east of CR 101. Neighborhood Open House: A Virtual Open House meeting for adjacent property owners was held on May 19, 2020. Preliminary information was available to property owners regarding the concept plans and impacts associated with the project. Approximately 20 residents were in attendance, as well as council members in both cities, city staff from both the City of Medina and the City of Corcoran, Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 11 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx and WSB engineering representatives. The primary feedback given related to the increased traffic potential, future development in the area, and drainage concerns. Mapping & Comment Activity: In order to gather input and engage the public on the Hackamore Road project, Social Pinpoint was used . The site includes an interactive map to compare the existing conditions, Option 1, and Option 2, as well as allows users the ability to add comments on the various options. The main feedback given centered around the additional turn lanes on Hackamore Road, (with residents both for and against the additional lane) drainage concerns, and the need to keep the green feel of the corridor. The comments from Social Pinpoint (to date) have been included in Appendix F. Proposed Schedule The proposed project schedule is as follows: Complete 30% Level of Geometric Design ................................................................ Late May 2020 1st Set of City Council Meetings (June 11th Corcoran, June 16th Medina) ........................ June 2020 Begin 75% Design (Single Option, All Phases, Upon Authorization) ................ Mid/Late June 2020 Finalize 75% Design ............................................................................................. July/August 2020 2nd Set of City Council Meetings (Authorize Final Design of Phase 1) ......................... August 2020 Complete 100% Final Design (Phase 1) ..................................................................... January 2021 Project Bidding (Phase 1) ........................................................................................... February 2021 Phase 1 Construction Complete ........................................................................................ Fall 2021 Phase 2/3 Design ................................................................................................... As Early As 2022 Phase 2/3 Construction ......................................................................................... As Early As 2023 Summary and Recommendation The Hackamore Road Improvement Project includes roadway, stormwater, intersection, and pedestrian improvements from Medina Lake Drive to Brockton Lane N (CR 101). The existing roadway has been identified for improvements by both the City of Corcoran and the City of Medina due to the deteriorating pavement and the need to accommodate the additional traffic volumes due to development in the area. The project was not only initiated to address deteriorating and insufficient infrastructure, but also to develop a cohesive plan that both cities can provide to adjacent property owners and developers to guide the transportation needs, right- of-way, and pedestrian mobility. Two alternates for the roadway, trail, and intersection controls were developed for this 30% Roadway Design Memorandum. Option 1 is a three-lane design, with a center turn lane through the length of the project, as well as additional right turn lanes where warranted for the developments. This option has the benefit of a continuous center turn lane for left turns to facilitate the adjacent development traffic. However, the option has a larger footprint than the existing roadway, as well as a larger impact than Option 2. Option 1 provides more flexibility in designing around future intersections to accommodate development where access points may not be known at this time. Option 2 is a two-lane design, with right and left turn lanes where warranted at both existing and anticipated intersection locations with future development. This option has the benefit of a narrower street section in some locations with fewer adjacent impacts. However, the option has a more complicated footprint with left and right turn lanes only as needed, causing more shifts to the roadway and trail alignments. Both options will have potential wetland impacts, utility relocations, and right of way needs, but Option 2 minimizes these to a greater extent. Hackamore Road Improvement Project - 30% Street Design Memorandum City of Corcoran & City of Medina June 4, 2020 Page 12 K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\30% Design Memos\Roadway Memo\1. 30% Hackamore Design Memo.docx Based on the information provided in this memorandum and staff input from staff in both cities, it is our recommendation Option 2 be pursued for 75% design. This option is less costly, while maintaining beneficial corridor improvements to accommodate current and future traffic levels. Option 2 minimizes cost through decreasing the impervious surface, lowering the stormwater management needs, minimizing wetland impacts, while improving safety with dedicated turn lanes and pedestrian facilities in a similar manner as Option 1. Proceeding with 75% design will provide the opportunity for the cities to refine costs, analyze funding mechanisms, and complete a cohesive plan guiding the transportation needs, right-of- way, and pedestrian mobility of this corridor. List of Figures and Appendices Appendix A – Concept Plans & Figures Figure 1A-F – Option 1/Option 2 Comparison Figure 2 – CR 116 Intersection Design Alternative Figure 3 – Project Phasing Plan Appendix B – Traffic Volume Figures and Turn Lane Analysis Appendix C – Geotechnical Report Appendix D – Opinion of Project Costs – Detailed Estimates Appendix E – Coordination Meeting Minutes Appendix F – Public Engagement Comments from Social Pinpoint Mapping Site FOXBERRY DRMEDINA LAKE DRUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/OF/OF/OUGEUGEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEOHEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGESTA 111+68.19, 0.00' FOXBERRY DRIVE STA 103+97.19, 0.00' RT MEDINA LAKE DRIVE 100+00 105+00 110+00 FOXBERRY DRMEDINA LAKE DRUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/OF/OF/OUGEUGEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEOHEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGESTA 111+68.19, 0.00' FOXBERRY DRIVE STA 103+97.19, 0.00' RT MEDINA LAKE DRIVE 100+00 105+00 110+00 HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1A SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 2 MATCHLINE STA: 113+00SEE FIGURE 1BMATCHLINE STA: 113+00SEE FIGURE 1BBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY BMP 1 5234 SF BMP 1 5234 SF POTENTIAL FOR TRAIL TO BE INSTALLED BY ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FUTUREDEVELOPMENTCTY ROAD 116UGT UGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/OF/OF/OF/OF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGESTA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 STA 121+63.93, 0.00' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 115+00 120+00 125+00 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT PHASE 3 PHASE 2 FUTUREDEVELOPMENTCTY ROAD 116UGT UGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/OF/OF/OF/OF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGESTA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 STA 121+63.93, 0.00' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 115+00 120+00 125+00 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT PHASE 3 PHASE 2 HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1B SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 2MATCHLINE STA: 113+00SEE FIGURE 1AMATCHLINE STA: 128+00SEE FIGURE 1CMATCHLINE STA: 113+00SEE FIGURE 1AMATCHLINE STA: 128+00SEE FIGURE 1CBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY CTY ROAD 116 SEE SHEET 1F CTY ROAD 116 SEE FIGURE 1F BMP 2 8268 SF BMP 2 8268 SF BMP 3N 3852 SF BMP 3S 9868 SF BMP 3N 3852 SF BMP 3S 9868 SF SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR TRAIL TO BE INSTALLED BY ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL TO MOVE TRAIL CLOSER TO ROADWAY TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL HACKAMORE CIRHUNTER RDUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O STA 136+86.43, 0.00' HUNTER ROAD STA 130+65.02, 0.00' HACKAMORE CIRCLE 130+00 135+00 140+00 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 HACKAMORE CIRHUNTER RDUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O STA 136+86.43, 0.00' HUNTER ROAD STA 130+65.02, 0.00' HACKAMORE CIRCLE 130+00 135+00 140+00 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1C SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 2MATCHLINE STA: 128+00SEE FIGURE 1BMATCHLINE STA: 143+00SEE FIGURE 1DMATCHLINE STA: 128+00SEE FIGURE 1BMATCHLINE STA: 143+00SEE FIGURE 1DBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY STEEPLE CHASE RDBERGAMOT DRUGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O STA 145+25.03, 0.00' STEEPLE CHASE ROAD STA 145+12.85, 0.00' BERGAMOT DRIVE 145+00 150+00 155+00 REMOVE AND REPLA EXISTING CULVE STEEPLE CHASE RDBERGAMOT DRUGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O STA 145+25.03, 0.00' STEEPLE CHASE ROAD STA 145+12.85, 0.00' BERGAMOT DRIVE 145+00 150+00 155+00 REMOVE AND REPLA EXISTING CULVE HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1D SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 2MATCHLINE STA: 143+00SEE FIGURE 1CMATCHLINE STA: 158+00SEE FIGURE 1EMATCHLINE STA: 143+00SEE FIGURE 1CMATCHLINE STA: 158+00SEE FIGURE 1EBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY BMP 4 11699 SF BMP 4 11699 SF SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SIZED TO TREAT HACKAMORE ROAD RUNOFF. POTENTIAL TO SHARE STORMWATER TREATMENT WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CTY ROAD 101UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHT F/OF/OF/OF/OF/OSTA 167+14.88, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 101 160+00 165+00 170+00 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT CTY ROAD 101UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHT F/OF/OF/OF/OF/OSTA 167+14.88, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 101 160+00 165+00 170+00 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1E SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 N HACKAMORE ROAD - OPTION 2MATCHLINE STA: 158+00SEE FIGURE 1DMATCHLINE STA: 158+00SEE FIGURE 1DBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY VERTICAL CURVE ADJUSTMENT VERTICAL CURVE ADJUSTMENT POTENTIAL RETAINING WALL WOULD REDUCE IMPACTS SHOWN POTENTIAL FOR TRAIL TO BE INSTALLED BY ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TRAIL BY OTHERS - SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY TRAIL BY OTHERS - SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY CTY ROAD 116UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OF/OOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEUGE UGE UGE UGEUGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 115+00CTY ROAD 116UGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OF/OF/OOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEUGE UGE UGE UGEUGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 115+00CTY ROAD 116 - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 1F SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100N CTY ROAD 116 - OPTION 2 HACKAMORE ROAD SEE FIGURE 1B HACKAMORE ROAD SEE FIGURE 1A HACKAMORE ROAD SEE FIGURE 1B HACKAMORE ROAD SEE FIGURE 1A BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL TURF BOULEVARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS PRELIMNARY PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMET NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY UGTUGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OF/OOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEUGE UGE UGE UGEUGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE CTY ROAD 116 STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116115+00UGTUGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OF/OF/OOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEUGE UGE UGE UGEUGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE CTY ROAD 116 STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116115+00CTY ROAD 116 - OPTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: SHEET OF DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 05/30/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACTS OPTIONS 1 AND 2 5 6 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100N CTY ROAD 116 - OPTION 2 HACKAMORE ROAD SEE SHEET 2 MATCHLINE STA: 158+00SEE SHEET 4HACKAMORE ROAD SEE SHEET 1 HACKAMORE ROAD SEE SHEET 2 HACKAMORE ROAD SEE SHEET 1 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LEGEND BITUMINOUS TRAIL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND IMPACTS RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMENT NEEDS WETLAND BOUNDARY 06/01/2020 FOXBERRY DRFUTUREDEVELOPMENTMEDINA LAKE DRCTY ROAD 116STA 111+68.19, 0.00' FOXBERRY DRIVE STA 103+97.19, 0.00' RT MEDINA LAKE DRIVE STA 114+17.16, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 116 STA 121+63.93, 0.00' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT HACKAMORE CIRHUNTER RDSTEEPLE CHASE RDFUTUREDEVELOPMENTBERGAMOT DRSTA 145+25.03, 0.00' STEEPLE CHASE ROAD STA 145+12.85, 0.00' BERGAMOT DRIVE STA 136+86.43, 0.00' HUNTER ROAD STA 130+65.02, 0.00' HACKAMORE CIRCLESTA 121+63.93, 0.00' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT STEEPLE CHASE RDCTY ROAD 101BERGAMOT DRSTA 167+14.88, 0.00' COUNTY ROAD 101 STA 145+25.03, 0.00' STEEPLE CHASE ROAD STA 145+12.85, 0.00' BERGAMOT DRIVE SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 100 200 N WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: FIGURE DATE: NO.DATE BY CHK REVISION 015661-000 AS SHOWN GMD GMD JLS 06/02/2020 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 30% DESIGN CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN PHASING 3 PHASE 1 LEGEND PHASE 2 PHASE 3 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Project Management Team: Brad Martens, City Administrator, City of Corcoran Kevin Mattson, PE, Public Works Director, City of Corcoran Scott Johnson, City Administrator, City of Medina Dusty Finke, AICP, Planning Director, City of Medina Steve Scherer, Public Works Director, City of Medina Jim Stremel, PE, Project Manager, WSB Lydia Ener, PE, Project Engineer, WSB Heather Nelson, PE, Water Resources Engineer, WSB From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE, Traffic Engineer, WSB Date: April 17, 2020 Re: Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Cities of Medina and Corcoran WSB Project No. 015661-000 In conjunction with the detailed design of the Hackamore Road improvement project (Medina Lake Drive to Brockton Lane) the location of turn lanes at intersections and access locations were analyzed. As part of the analysis, criteria were reviewed to guide the identification of locations where it may be appropriate to construct dedicated right or left turn lanes. There are several sources that can be used to determine the need for turn lanes. Recommendations from guidance documents were reviewed including: • MnDOT Road Design Manual • MnDOT Access Management Manual • MnDOT/LRRB (Local Road Research Board) Research Report 2008-14: Turn Lane Lengths for Various Speed Road and Evaluation of Determining Criteria • NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study The analysis provides for implementing turn lanes in a way to improve the safety of uncontrolled intersection movements by removing the turning traffic from the through lane. Turn lanes should be added to any design where suitable space, right-of-way, and finances are available for construction. The primary input for analyzing the need for turn lanes is the traffic conditions at each specific intersection within the corridor. For the Hackamore Road Improvement project future year traffic conditions were determined by projecting the existing 2020 traffic counts to the year 2040 by including a background traffic growth of 1%/year and estimating the traffic volume from the current adjacent development that is yet to be completed and adjacent future development. The projected 2040 AM and PM peak hour volumes, assuming full development of the area traffic, are shown on the attached figure. The following sections provides a summary of each guidance document indicated above as well as the recommended locations for turn lanes at each intersection in the Hackamore Road corridor. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 2 MnDOT Road Design Manual: The MnDOT Road Design Manual includes the following guidance for the location of turn lanes: • In urban areas, right- and left-turn lanes should be considered whenever construction is economically feasible. • In urban areas, for preservation projects, left-turn lanes should be provided if feasible at nonpublic access locations generating high traffic volumes, at locations where crash locations confirm the existence of a hazard, and at locations determined by the District Traffic Engineer in consideration of crashes, capacity and traffic volumes. • In urban areas, for preservation projects, right-turn lanes should, if feasible, be provided at all public road intersections and other locations as determined by the District Traffic Engineer in consideration of crashes, capacity and traffic volumes. • Continuous left-turn lanes for urban areas have no rigid design criteria – but generally should be considered in the following: when shifting from rural to suburban or urban areas; generally used with lower speeds; volumes should not be excessive for the facility type; center turn lane should generally be 14 feet wide; if the roadway is being reconstructed, realign opposite side driveway entrances if feasible; and pavement markings should be developed by the District Traffic Engineer. • Continuous right-turn lanes may be considered in locations where driveways are closely spaced. They should not be longer than a quarter of a mile and speeds must be greater than 30 miles per hour, with heavier volumes and high turning demands. • In rural areas, right-turn lanes should be considered when the projected ADT is over 1,500, the design speed is 45 miles per hour or higher at all public road access points; if industrial, commercial or substantial trip generating land use is to be served; or if the access serves more than 10 residential units. • In rural areas, left-turn lanes should be provided when the access is to a public road, an industrial tract or a commercial center. • In rural areas, if a left-turn lane is not warranted or if the construction of a left-turn lane is not practical (due to right of way, environmental constraints, etc.), a bypass should be considered. Preferably only at “T” intersections. Four-legged intersections should only consider a bypass lane after all other solutions have been found impractical and the cross-street volume is low. As can be seen from the information above, the MnDOT Road Design Manual is conservative with regard to the construction of dedicated right or left-turn lane construction. Guidance from this document suggests that turn lanes should be constructed at all public streets in rural areas, along with selected locations for commercial, residential and industrial uses. In urban areas they are to be considered whenever feasible. MnDOT Access Management Manual: The MnDOT Access Management Manual is less conservative than the MnDOT Road Design Manual and identifies higher thresholds on the need for dedicated turn lanes. Highlights from the MnDOT Access Management Manual are listed below: Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 3 • Right-turn treatment versus a right-turn lane: the guidelines indicate that a right-turn lane may not be needed if a right-turn treatment can be provided (widening of the shoulder, removing conflicting striping and shoulder rumble strips, prohibiting on street parking in urban areas and/or adding pavement thickness to the shoulder) instead. • Turn lanes should be provided at public street connections and driveways in accordance with the MnDOT Road Design Manual – Section 5-3. • Turn lane warrants for undivided highways: o Warrant 1: Passing lane/climbing lane – at high volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections located on highway segments where passing lanes or climbing lanes are present in the approach direction. o Warrant 2: Limited sight distance/terrain – at all driveways and public street connections with inadequate stopping sight distance or located on short vertical curves or steep grades. o Warrant 3: Railroad crossings – at high volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections where a railroad is parallel to the highway and where the potential exists for vehicles delayed by a train to back up into the through lanes of the highway, creating both safety and operational problems. o Warrant 4: Signalized intersections – at all signalized public street connections and driveways. o Warrant 5: Heavy-vehicle traffic – at all driveways and public street connections high-speed highways (posted speed ≥45 mph) where the heavy- vehicle turning volume is 15 or more vehicles per hour for at least eight hours a day for four months or more per year. o Warrant 6: School entrances – at public and private school driveways on high- speed highways used by school traffic. o Warrant 7: Crash history – at high-volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections that demonstrate a history of crashes of the type suitable to correction by a turn lane or turn-lane treatment, or where adequate trial of other remedies has failed to reduce crash frequency. o Warrant 8: Corridor crash experience – on highway corridors that demonstrate a history of similar crash types suitable to correction by providing corridor -wide consistency in turn-lane use. o Warrant 9: Vehicular volumes – at high-volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections on high-speed highways (posted speeds ≥45 mph) that satisfy the following: Highway AADT one year after opening; posted speed of 45 mph or higher 2-Lane Highway (AADT) Cross Street/Driveway (ADT) Turn Lane Requirement > 1,500 >100 Right-turn lane warranted 1,500 – 2,999 >1,500 Left-turn lane warranted 3,000 – 3,999 >1,200 Left-turn lane warranted 4,000 to 4,999 >1,000 Left-turn lane warranted 5,000 to 6,499 >800 Left-turn lane warranted >6,500 101 – 400 Left-turn lane or bypass lane >6,500 >400 Left-turn lane warranted Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 4 Under the warrant analysis outlined in the MnDOT Access Management Manual, right-turn lanes would be recommended at all public street locations as well as private driveways that generate 100 trips or more per day. This is generally consistent with the MnDOT Road Design Manual. However, the construction of left-turn lanes outlined by the MnDOT Access Management Manual would require most side street cross volumes to be significantly higher than they currently are on Hackamore Road in order to construct a dedicated turn lane. This varies from the MnDOT Road Design Manual, which would indicate that in rural areas, left-turn lanes should be provided at all public streets – regardless of volumes – if they are feasible to construct. MnDOT/LRRB (Local Road Research Board) Research Report 2008-14: Turn Lane Lengths for Various Speed Road and Evaluation of Determining Criteria: Although this document discusses more on turn lane lengths , it does outline several criteria for turn lane warrants, including those found in the MnDOT Road Design Manual and the MnDOT Traffic Engineering Manual. The MnDOT Road Design Manual criteria was discussed above. The criteria outlined in the MnDOT 1999 Traffic Engineering Manual provides figures based on the roadway speed limit and design hour volumes. The figures below represent the criteria outlined for left turn lanes with major roadway speed of 40-45mph and for right turn lanes. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 5 Applying this criterion would represent the most conservative approach for implementation of left turn lanes. All left turn movements on Hackamore Road except the following would meet the volume requirements for a dedicated lane: • Maple Lake Drive Westbound • Foxberry Drive Westbound • Future Street east of Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Eastbound • Hackamore Circle Eastbound • Hunter Road/Future Street Eastbound • Steeple Chase Lane/Bergamot Drive Westbound For right turn lanes this criterion is not as conservative as that outline in the MnDOT Road Design Manual or MnDOT Access Management Manual which would recommend a right turn lane at every intersection that has more than 100 trips per day. Applying the above criterion right turn movements would meet the volume requirements for a dedicated lane except at the following Hackamore Road approaches: • Maple Lake Drive Eastbound • Foxberry Drive Eastbound • Hackamore Circle Westbound • Hunter Road/Future Street Eastbound • Steeple Chase Lane/Bergamot Drive Eastbound NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study: Guidance from the NCHRP Report indicate the following should be used to determine when to provide a left turn lane: • A left turn lane should be considered at any median crossover on divided, high speed road. • A left turn lane should be provided on the unstopped approach of a high-speed rural highway when it intersection with other arterial or collectors. • A left turn lane is recommended on the unstopped approach of any intersection when the combination of the intersection volumes intersect above or to the right of the appropriate trend line shown in the associated figures based on speed on the major roadway. The NCHRP Report also develop guidance for the need for right turn lanes based on operating and collision costs compared to the cost of constructing a right turn lane. The figures below show the turn lane criteria for two-lane roadways with a 40mph speed limit. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 6 The above guidance represents the most stringent criteria for installation of right and left turn lanes. By applying this criteria, the only turn lanes that would be warranted on Hackamore Road is the eastbound left turn and westbound right turn at the Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) intersection. The other movements that meet the warrants are: • Pinto (CSAH 116) Northbound Right • Pinto (CSAH 116) Northbound Left • Pinto (CSAH 116) Southbound Left • Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Northbound Right • Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Northbound Left • Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Southbound Left Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 7 Turn Lane Recommendations Based on review of each intersection in the Hackamore Road corridor using the above criteria and engineering judgement the following locations for left and right turn lanes should be considered. While these turn lane locations provides for a more conservative recommendation, it will provide for the safest and most efficient roadway system. Maple Lake Drive/Future Street (to north): Eastbound Left turn lane to the Future Street Westbound Right turn lane to the Future Street Foxberry Drive: No Turn Lanes Pinto Drive (CSAH 116): Eastbound Left turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Eastbound Right turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Westbound Left turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Westbound Right turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Northbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Northbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road Future Street (to north): Westbound Right turn lane to Future Street Hackamore Circle: No Turn Lanes Hunter Road/Future Street (to south): Westbound Left turn lane to Hunter Road Westbound Right turn lane to Hunter Road Steeple Chase Lane/Bergamot Drive: Eastbound Left turn lane to Steeple Chase Lane Westbound Right turn lane to Steeple Chase Lane Church Entrance (to north): Eastbound Left turn lane to Church Entrance Westbound Right turn lane to Church Entrance Brockton Lane (CSAH 101): Eastbound Left turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Eastbound Right turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Westbound Left turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Westbound Right turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Northbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Northbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road 2040 Traffic Volumes LEGEND XX(XX) AM(PM) Forecast Peak Hour Movements 248 Assumed Build Lane Configuration Traffic Signal Traffic Sign Hackamore Rd Brockon LnPinto DrHunter RdBergamot DrMedina Lake DrFoxberry DrFuture Access West18 (10)0 (0)24 (15)21 (56) p s 8 (25) j (19) 6 2 (11) x 0 m (1) 0(0) 0(9) 10(66) 94 (0) 0 d 31 (95) 1 (6) - m (0) 0(4) 18(93) 125 (0) 0 Future Access East5 (5)0 (0)27 (9)p (16) 8 10 (22)k s f 12 (30) x 0 144 (213) (9) 4 m (10) 12(0) 0(16) 26(188) 219 0 (1)43 (33)25 (37)k 0 (4)13 (4)x 4 104 (227) p s f (15) 11 m (1) 1(4) 0(1) 4(205) 245 (2) 2 74 (155) i r w s 170 (145)41 (29)570 (257)122 (41)k 26 (82) f x 2 4 8(44) 32 v (81) 29(598) 163(183) 198(154) 212 ,(36) 61 Hackamore Road Traffic Analysis Medina and Corcoran, MN (42) 77 ,(25) 45 (29) 23 v (35) 2(691) 117(137) 6889 (59) x 2 7 18 (47) 29 (70) f k 68 (41)w s11 (20)592 (161)u (13) 10 v(207) 203 x 16 (26)22 (16)k f 151 (202)10 (8)[ 2020 Traffic Volumes Hackamore Road Traffic Analysis Medina and Corcoran, MN LEGEND XX(XX) AM(PM) Existing Peak Hour Movements 248 Lane Configuration Traffic Signal Traffic Sign Hackamore Rd Brockon LnPinto DrHunter RdBergamot DrMedina Lake DrFoxberry Drm (1) 0(7) 8(54) 77 (0) 0 2 (9) - d 17 (46) m (0) 0(3) 15(64) 83 (0) 0 1 (5) - d 19 (57) (7) 3 c(112) 143 j 85 (127) 8 (18)4 (4)22 (7)[ (6) 5 /(1) 1(3) 0(1) 3(133) 147 (2) 2 4 57 (125) p d 14 (18)k 0 (3)0 (1)23 (17)4 (0)(27) 13 /(42) 12(490) 134(150) 162(106) 143 (14) 28 2 4 8 44 (93) i r w 139 (119)27 (10)467 (211)100 (34)21 (67) ;8 (14)485 (132)u 48 (21)w 10 (24) 14 (51) ; (22) 17 ?(25) 1(566) 96(94) 4458 (37) 2 7 (25) 48 (19) 34 2040 Traffic Volumes LEGEND XX(XX) AM(PM) Forecast Peak Hour Movements 248 Assumed Build Lane Configuration Traffic Signal Traffic Sign Hackamore Rd Brockon LnPinto DrHunter RdBergamot DrMedina Lake DrFoxberry DrFuture Access West18 (10)0 (0)24 (15)21 (56) p s 8 (25) j (19) 6 2 (11) x 0 m (1) 0(0) 0(9) 10(66) 94 (0) 0 d 31 (95) 1 (6) - m (0) 0(4) 18(93) 125 (0) 0 Future Access East5 (5)0 (0)27 (9)p (16) 8 10 (22)k s f 12 (30) x 0 144 (213) (9) 4 m (10) 12(0) 0(16) 26(188) 219 0 (1)43 (33)25 (37)k 0 (4)13 (4)x 4 104 (227) p s f (15) 11 m (1) 1(4) 0(1) 4(205) 245 (2) 2 74 (155) i r w s 170 (145)41 (29)570 (257)122 (41)k 26 (82) f x 2 4 8(44) 32 v (81) 29(598) 163(183) 198(154) 212 ,(36) 61 Hackamore Road Traffic Analysis Medina and Corcoran, MN (42) 77 ,(25) 45 (29) 23 v (35) 2(691) 117(137) 6889 (59) x 2 7 18 (47) 29 (70) f k 68 (41)w s11 (20)592 (161)u (13) 10 v(207) 203 x 16 (26)22 (16)k f 151 (202)10 (8)[ July 10, 2019 Project Number: 19-0488 Mr. Nick Wyers Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359-0249 RE: Geotechnical Exploration Report, Hackamore Road Reconstruction Project, Corcoran, Minnesota Dear Mr. Wyers: We have completed the geotechnical exploration report for the Hackamore Road Project in Corcoran, Minnesota. Very briefly, we advanced six (6) soil borings along the various roadway alignments to determine existing bituminous pavement section thicknesses and to characterize subsurface soil and groundwater conditions. Specific details regarding our procedures, results and recommendations follow in the attached geotechnical exploration report. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Paul Gionfriddo at 612-271-8185. Sincerely, Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. Senior Engineer G EOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PROJECT: Hackamore Road Reconstruction Project Brockton Lane to Pinto Drive Corcoran, Minnesota PREPARED FOR: Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359-0249 PREPARED BY: Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC 2825 Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407 Haugo GeoTechnical Services Project: 19-0488 July 10, 2019 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. Senior Engineer License Number 23093 Expires June 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Purpose 1 1.3 Site Description 1 1.4 Scope of Services 1 1.5 Documents Provided 2 1.6 Locations and Elevations 2 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES 2 3.0 RESULTS 3 3.1 Pavements 3 3.2 Soil Conditions 3 3.3 Groundwater 3 3.4 Laboratory Testing 4 3.5 OSHA Soil Classification 4 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 4.1 Proposed Construction 4 4.2 Discussion 5 4.3 Utility and Pavement Subgrade Preparation 6 4.4 Pavement Recommendations 7 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 9 5.1 Excavation 9 5.2 Observations 9 5.3 Backfill and Fills 9 5.4 Testing 9 5.5 Winter Construction 10 6.0 PROCEDURES 10 6.1 Soil Classification 10 6.2 Groundwater Observations 10 7.0 GENERAL 10 7.1 Subsurface Variations 10 7.2 Review of Design 11 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations 11 7.4 Use of Report 11 7.5 Level of Care 11 APPENDIX 12 Boring Location Sketch Soil Boring Logs, SB-1 thru SB-6 Descriptive Terminology 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description The City of Corcoran (City) in conjunction with Wenck Associates (Wenck) is preparing to reconstruct Hackamore Road between Brockton Lane and Pinto Drive in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City of Corcoran retained Wenck to solicit quotes for a geotechnical exploration for the project and to prepare design and construction documents. The specific roadway section slated for reconstruction along with the specific scope of services were described in the “Request for Quotes – Drilling, Sampling, and Geotechnical Recommendations for Hackamore Road Reconstruct in Corcoran, MN” (RFQ) dated May 17, 2019. Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC (HGTS), the successful bidder on the project, was retained to advance soil borings along the roadway alignment to determine existing bituminous pavement thicknesses, provide an estimated R-Value of the subgrade soils and provide recommendations for utility installations and pavement design. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and provide recommendations for utility installations including; excavation, dewatering, backfill and compaction and provide an estimated R-Value of the subgrade soil for use in pavement design. We anticipate the results and recommendations presented in our report will be used by Wenck to prepare design and construction documents for the project. 1.3 Site Description Hackamore Road between Brockton Lane (aka County Road 101) and Pinto Drive (aka County Road 116) in Corcoran currently exists as a two-lane bituminous paved roadway. The roadway alignment is gently rolling a with ground surface elevations at the boring locations ranging from about 987 on the west end of the alignment near its intersection with Pinto Drive to about elevation 1010 near the middle of the alignment then to about 978 on the east end of the alignment near its intersection with Brockton Lane. Observations of the roadway surface showed numerous longitudinal, transverse and block cracks. It appears the pavements are approaching or have exceeded their expected design life. 1.4 Scope of Services Our services were performed in accordance with the Scope of Services presented in the RFQ and under the terms of our General Conditions. Our scope of services was limited to the following tasks: • Completing six (6) standard penetration test borings each to a nominal depth of 10 feet. • Visually/manually classifying the samples recovered from the soil borings. • Performing laboratory testing on select soil samples. • Preparing soil boring logs describing the materials encountered and the results of groundwater level measurements. 2 • Preparing an engineering report describing soil and groundwater conditions, providing estimated subgrade soil R-Value(s) and providing recommendations for utility and pavement design and construction. 1.5 Documents Provided Except for the RFQ prepared by Wenck and dated May 17, 2019 we were not provided any specific civil engineering drawing or documents. Based on correspondence with Wenk we understand the project will include installing underground watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer utilities. 1.6 Locations and Elevations The soil boring locations were selected and staked in the field by Wenck. Ground surface elevations at the soil boring locations were provided by Wenck. The approximate locations of the soil borings are shown on the Attachment A maps in the Appendix which were included in the RFQ. 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES The six (6) standard penetration test borings were advanced on June 13, 2019 by HGTS with a rotary drilling rig, using continuous flight augers to advance the boreholes. Representative samples were obtained from the borings, using the split-barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM Specification D-1586. In the split-barrel sampling procedure, a 2-inch O.D. split-barrel spoon is driven into the ground with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18-inch penetration is recorded as the standard penetration resistance value, or "N" value. The results of the standard penetration tests are indicated on the boring log. The samples were sealed in containers and provided to HGTS for testing and soil classification. A field log of each boring was prepared by the HGTS drill crew. The logs contain visual classifications of the soil materials encountered during drilling, as well as the driller's interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples and water observation notes. The final boring logs included with this report represent an interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on visual/manual method observation of the samples. The soil boring logs, general terminology for soil description and identification, and classification of soils for engineering purposes are also included in the appendix. The soil boring logs identify and describe the materials encountered, the relative density or consistency based on the Standard Penetration resistance (N-value, “blows per foot”) and groundwater observations. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions, variations can occur beyond the location of the boring. 3 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Pavement and Aggregate Each of the borings encountered a pavement sections at the surface consisted of varying thicknesses of bituminous and possible aggregate base and are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1. Summary of Existing Roadway Section Boring Number Approximate Bituminous Thickness (inches) Approximate Aggregate Base Thickness (inches) Subgrade Soil Type (ASTM) SB-1 5 5 CL – Fill/Buried Topsoil SB-2 5 5 ½ CL – Buried Topsoil SB-3 4 6 CL - Fill SB-4 5 5 ½ CL – Buried Topsoil SB-5 3 ½ 5 CL or CL-ML SB-6 7 5 CL 3.2 Soil Conditions Underlying the pavement section soil borings SB-1 thru SB-4 borings encountered varying thicknesses of buried topsoil and Fill consisting predominantly of sandy lean clay or silty clay. Organic contents within the buried topsoil indicated it was slightly organic to organic. Below the buried topsoil or Fill and below the pavement section in borings SB-5 and SB-6 the soil borings predominantly encountered native glacial till soils composed of sandy lean clay with lesser amounts of silty clay and clayey sand. An approximate 2 ½ foot layer silty clay alluvium was encountered in soil boring SB-1 at about 7 feet below the ground surface. The glacial till soils extended to the termination depths of the borings. The N-Values shown as blows per foot (bpf) on the boring logs within the buried topsoil or Fill ranged from 6 to 11 bpf indicating a medium to rather stiff consistency. The N-Values within the silty clay alluvium was 2 indicating a soft consistency. The N-Values within the native sandy lean clay and silty clay glacial till soils ranged from 4 to 14 bpf indicating a rather soft to a stiff consistency. The N-Value within the clayey sand was 9 indicating a loose relative density. 3.3 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling and sampling or after removing the augers from the boreholes. Water levels were measured on the dates as noted on the boring logs and the period of water level observations was relatively short. However, given the cohesive nature of the soils encountered, it is possible that insufficient time was available for groundwater to seep into the borings and rise to its hydrostatic level. Groundwater monitoring wells or piezometers would be required to more 4 accurately determine water levels. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the groundwater levels should be expected. 3.4 Laboratory Testing Laboratory moisture content, organic content and Atterberg Limit tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the soil borings The moisture contents ranged from about 15 ½ to 35 ½ percent. These values indicate the clayey soil were likely above their assumed optimum soil moisture content. Table 2 provides a summary of the laboratory testing. Table 2. Summary of Laboratory Analysis Boring Number Sample Number Depth (feet) Moisture Content (%)* Organic (%)* Atterberg Limits (LL/PL)** SB-1 S-27 2 ½ 19 5 - SB-1 S-29 7 ½ 28 4 - SB-2 S-2 2 ½ 23 6 - SB-2 S-3 5 28 - - SB-3 S-22 2 ½ 15 ½ - - SB-4 S-7 2 ½ 24 - 44.4/30.0 SB-4 S-8 5 20 ½ - - SB-5 S-17 2 ½ 35 ½ - - SB-6 S-12 2 ½ 16 - - SB-6 S-13 5 17 - 34.7/25.0 *Moisture content and Organic contents were rounded to the nearest ½ percent. ** LL = Liquid Limit, PL= Plastic Limit 3.5 OSHA Soil Classification The soil encountered in the borings consisted predominantly of cohesive (clay) soils composed of sandy lean clay and silty clay corresponding to the ASTM Classification CL and CL-ML, respectively. The clayey soils identified in the soil borings will generally be Type B soils under the Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Proposed Construction This project will include installing underground watermain, storm sewer and sanitary sewer utilities and reconstructing Hackamore Road between Brockton Lane to Pinto Drive. Total length of the alignment is about 1 mile. We anticipate that site grading will consist of earthwork necessary for roadway reconstruction and we do not anticipate any significant changes in the roadway alignment or roadway grades. Cuts or fills involving permanent grade change, if any, are assumed to be less than 2 feet. We were not provided any information regarding traffic volumes such as Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) counts or vehicle distribution for the roadways. We assume Hackamore Road will be used by a variety of automobiles, light trucks, school busses, garbage trucks as well as heavier 5 single unit and multi-unit (tractor trailer) delivery vehicles. Based on information provided on the Minnesota Department of Transportation website, the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) along Hackamore Road was about 2400 vehicles based on 2017 data. Based on a brief review of historical aerial photographs available on Google Earth it appears that the recent construction of residential developments in the area may have resulted in an increase in traffic volumes along Hackamore Road. Since the vehicle counts were based on 2017 data, we assumed a simple 3% growth and estimate that current traffic along Hackamore road to be about 2472 AADT corresponding to an estimated 376,500 Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL’s) over a 20-year design life. The estimated traffic volumes and corresponding ESAL’s do not account for any future growth. We were not provided specific information regarding pipe invert elevations, pipe sizes or pipe materials (i.e. ductile iron, concrete, PVC etc.) We assume that the watermain and sanitary sewer utilities will be constructed at typical burial depths ranging from about 7 to 10 feet below existing site grades with the storm sewer utilities will be installed at depths ranging from about 3 to 6 feet below the ground surface. We have attempted to describe our understanding of the project. Changes in the nature, design or location of all or parts of this project may occur which could require additional analyses and revised recommendations. 4.2 Discussion Bituminous We observed numerous cracks within the pavement surfaces including longitudinal, transverse, block and fatigue cracking. The latter is sometimes referred to as alligator cracking. Longitudinal cracking are cracks parallel to the pavement centerline and are often caused by poor joint construction or joint location. Transverse cracks are perpendicular to the pavement centerline and are usually a type of thermal cracking. Block cracking consists of interconnected cracks that divide the pavement up into rectangular pieces that can vary in size from about 1 square foot to 100 square feet. Block cracking is usually caused by shrinkage of the asphalt and daily temperature cycling and the inability of the asphalt binder to expand and contract. This inability to expand and contract is usually the result of age. Fatigue cracking is a series of interconnected cracks caused by fatigue failure of the pavement under repeated traffic loads in thin pavements. Additional causes of fatigue cracking include but are not limited to; increased loading (i.e. more and heavier vehicles), inadequate structural design or poor construction (i.e. inadequate compaction). Potholes are typically the end result of fatigue cracking. We were not provided any information on the age of the existing pavement sections but based on the numerous cracks observed it is likely the roadways have exceeded their design life. The pavement thickness may have been adequate when the pavements and surrounding homes were first constructed but increases in traffic volumes over time has likely exceeded the pavements ability to support the current traffic loads. Aggregate Base Based on our observations, it does not appear that the existing aggregate base/possible aggregate base would meet a Mn/DOT gradation requirement for Class 5 aggregate base. We anticipate that new/virgin aggregate base will be required for roadway reconstruction. Subgrade Soils Underlying the aggregate base, borings SB-1 through SB-4 encountered about buried topsoil or Fill that extended to depths ranging from about 2 to 7 feet. Laboratory organic content tests performed on the topsoil or buried topsoil indicated it was slightly organic to organic. 6 Organic soils or soil containing organic materials are generally compressible and are poor quality soils for pavement support. Organic soils and soils that are black in color or contain roots or other debris should not be relied upon for roadway or utility support and should not be reused as fill or backfill for utility support or for roadway support. We recommend they be removed and replaced with suitable compacted engineered fill. Soft clayey alluvium was encountered in boring below the buried topsoil in boring SB-1. The soft clayey alluvium was also slightly organic and will not be suitable for pipe support. We recommend removing the soft clay from below the pipe invert elevations and replacing it with suitable bedding. The underlying stiffer native clayey glacial till soils, in our opinion, are generally suitable for pipe and roadway support. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling and sampling or after removing the augers from the boreholes. We do not anticipate that groundwater will be encountered during construction and do not anticipate that dewatering will be required. We anticipate perched groundwater, if encountered, can be removed with sumps and pumps in clay excavations. 4.3 Utility and Pavement Subgrade Preparation Excavations We recommend that all pavements, vegetation, topsoil, soft/very loose Fill soils, buried topsoil, soft clays and other unsuitable materials, if encountered, be removed from below the proposed utilities, pavement and oversize areas. We anticipate that the utilities will be supported on engineered fill and/or the native clayey glacial till soils which in our opinion are suitable for pipe support. Table 3 below summarizes the anticipated excavation depths at the boring locations Excavation depths may vary and could be deeper. Table 3. Anticipated Excavation Depths Boring Number Measured Surface Elevation (feet) Anticipated Excavation Depth (feet)* Anticipated Excavation Elevation (feet)* Approximate Groundwater Elevation SB-1 987.6 7 - 9 978 ½ - 980 ½ NE SB-2 996.2 4 ½ 991 ½ NE SB-3 1003.5 2 1001 ½ NE SB-4 1010.1 2 1008 NE SB-5 986.4 1 985 ½ NE SB-6 978.5 1 977 ½ NE * = Excavation elevations were rounded to nearest ½ foot. NE= Not Encountered Since pipe invert elevations for the watermain and sanitary sewer utilities are anticipate to extend to depths ranging from about 7 to 10 feet below the ground surface, removal of the buried topsoil and other unsuitable materials will likely be incidental to construction. Oversizing In areas where the excavations extend below the proposed pavement or utility elevations, the excavation requires oversizing. We recommend the perimeter of the excavation be extended a foot outside the proposed footprint for every foot below finish grade (1H:1V oversizing). The purpose of the oversizing is to provide lateral support of the pavement or utility. 7 Backfilling We recommend bedding material be thoroughly compacted around the pipes. We recommend that engineered fill placed to establish pavement grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698), the exception being within 3 feet of the proposed pavement subgrade, where 100 percent of standard Proctor density is required. In landscaped areas we recommend a minimum compaction of 90 percent. Granular fill classified as SP or SP-SM should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. Other fill soils should be placed within 3 percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin lifts and be compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode. We anticipate that the soil removed for utility construction will likely be re-used as fill and backfill to the greatest extent possible. The on-site clay soils appear to be generally suitable for reuse as fill or backfill, however, these soils appear to be over their optimum moisture contents and will likely require significant moisture conditioning (drying) to achieve proper compaction. Drying of wet clay soils is best achieved during summer months. We recommend that fill or backfill placed in wet excavations or within 2 feet of the groundwater table, if encountered, consist of granular soil (sand) with less than 5 percent passing the number 200 sieve and at least 50 percent retained on the number 40 sieve. Additional backfill, if needed, to attain pavement subgrade elevation can consist of any mineral soil provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious materials. We assume clay soils will be used as engineered fill or backfill. As discussed in section 4.2 above the topsoil, buried topsoil, organic soils or soils that are black in color are not suitable for use as fill or backfill. 4.4 Dewatering Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling and sampling or after removing the augers from the boreholes. We do not anticipate that groundwater will be encountered during construction and do not anticipate that dewatering will be required. The clayey glacial till soils can contain sand seams, which may not become apparent until construction, and water could be perched within them. We anticipate that perched groundwater, if encountered, can be removed with sumps and pumps in clay excavations. 4.5 Pavement Recommendations The City of Corcoran may have standard plates that dictate bituminous pavement design. We recommend that the pavements be designed in accordance with the appropriate standard plates. The following paragraphs provide general pavement recommendations in the absence of City of Corcoran standard plates. New utilities will be installed as part of this project. We recommend the pavement subgrade be prepared as recommend in Section 4.3 above. Prior to placing the sand sub-base or aggregate base 8 (Class 5), we recommend the subgrade surface be test rolled with a loaded tandem truck to identify soft, weak, loose or unstable areas that may require additional subcuts. R-Values Laboratory tests to determine the soils Hveem Stabilometer R-Value (R-Value) was beyond the scope of this project. Information provided in the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Geotechnical & Pavement Manual, Part II, indicates that R-Values for clay materials meeting the ASTM Classification CL can range from 6 to 18. Since the borings were spaced fairly far apart and to account for potential variations in subgrade soil conditions it is our opinion that an R- Value of 10 can be used for pavement design. Sand Subbase Because of the poor frost/drainage properties of the clayey subgrade soils we recommend you consider placing a minimum 1 ½ foot thick drained sand sub-base below the aggregate base course in the new pavement areas. We recommend using sand with less than 12% passing the #200 sieve, such as MN/DOT 3149.2B2 (Select Granular Borrow). If the sand sub-base is used we recommend the sub-base extend beneath the curbs and to 2 feet beyond the outside edges of the curbs for frost and drainage uniformity. Sand layers outside the curbs should be capped with slow draining soil to reduce surface water infiltration. If a sand sub-base is used in the pavement areas, drain tile should be installed to remove infiltrating water. The drain tile should be connected to the catch basins. The slope of the bottom of the sub-cut should be such that water is directed to the drainage areas. The sub-cut bottom should not include depressions that can act as reservoirs for water collection. Pavement Sections It must be noted that the following pavement section thicknesses are not absolutes and are based on the assumptions presented in section 4.1 above. Traffic volumes were estimated, and actual values could vary. There may be alternate pavement sections that will provide the required performance and may be more cost effective. Alternate pavement section thicknesses can be provided if required or requested. For a 10-ton design with roads subjected to a maximum of 376,500 ESAL’s and a subgrade R-Value of 10, a minimum Granular Equivalency (GE) of 32.5 is required for pavement support. We recommend a pavement section consisting of a minimum of 6½ inches of bituminous over a minimum of 18 inches of MN/DOT Class 5 aggregate base. Alternately if a granular subbase layer is installed we recommend a minimum of 6 inches of bituminous, over a minimum of 10 inches of Class 5 aggregate base underlain by a minimum of 18 inches of select granular (sand) sub-base. Materials We recommend compacting the SPNW bituminous pavements to at least 93% of the maximum theoretical density and compacting SPWE bituminous pavements to at least 92% of the maximum theoretical density. We recommend the sand sub-base, if used, contain less than 12% passing the #200 sieve, such as a MN/DOT 3149.2B2 (Select Granular Borrow). We recommend the sand sub-base be compacted to 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor dry density. 9 We recommend aggregate base meeting Mn/DOT specification 3138 for Class 5 aggregate base. We recommend the aggregate base be compacted to 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor dry density. The new pavement areas will likely include concrete curb and gutter. We recommend specifying concrete that has a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 3,900 psi. We recommend specifying 5 to 8 percent entrained air for exposed concrete to provide resistance to freeze-thaw deterioration. We recommend slump, air content and compressive strength tests of Portland cement concrete. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation The soil encountered in the borings consisted predominantly of cohesive (clay) soils composed of sandy lean clay and silty clay corresponding to the ASTM Classification CL and CL-ML, respectively. The clayey soils identified in the soil borings will generally be Type B soils under the Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. Temporary excavations in Type B soils should be constructed at a minimum of 1 foot horizontal to every 1 foot vertical within excavations. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. If site constraints do not allow the construction of slopes with these dimensions then temporary shoring may be required. 5.2 Observations A geotechnical engineer or qualified engineering technician should observe the excavation subgrade to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered in the borings and adequate to support the proposed construction. 5.3 Backfill and Fills Site soils that will be excavated and reused as backfill and fill appear to be above their assumed optimum moisture content. We anticipate it may be necessary to moisture condition (dry) these soils to achieve the recommended compaction. We recommend that fill and backfill be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 to 12 inches, depending on the size of the compactor and materials used. 5.4 Testing We recommend density tests of backfill and fills placed during utility installations and pavement construction. Samples of the proposed materials should be submitted to our laboratory prior to placement for evaluation of their suitability and to determine their optimum moisture content and maximum dry density (Standard Proctor). 10 5.5 Winter Construction If site grading and construction is anticipated to proceed during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading and placement of fill. No fill should be placed on frozen soil and no frozen soil should be used as fill or backfill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM and/or ACI. Concrete should not be placed on frozen soil. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is obtained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below the footings. 6.0 PROCEDURES 6.1 Soil Classification The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, “Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure).” Soil terminology notes are included in the Appendix. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review of the field classification by a geotechnical engineer. Samples will be retained for a period of 30 days. 6.2 Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottom of the borings, the hole was checked for the presence of groundwater. Again, at the end of the drilling day, the borings were re-checked for the presence of groundwater with the levels and time delay being noted on the boring logs. 7.0 GENERAL 7.1 Subsurface Variations The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from a limited number of soil borings. Variations can occur away from the borings, the nature of which may not become apparent until additional exploration work is completed or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in this report should be made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional excavation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program during construction to evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes have affected the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the designs, specifications and construction methods. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. 11 7.2 Review of Design This report is based on the design of the proposed street reconstruction as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the design and specifications. With the review we will evaluate whether any changes have affected the validity of the recommendations and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations We made water level measurements in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. The data was interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. 7.4 Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of Wenck Associates, Inc. and their design team to use to design the proposed roadways and prepare construction documents. In the absence of our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analysis and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. 7.5 Level of Care Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC has used the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar circumstance by members of the profession currently practicing in this locality. No warranty expressed or implied is made. APPENDIX DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.:WARNING:THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALLCOOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FORTHE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIEDSTRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.GOPHER STATE ONE CALLTWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166CALL BEFORE YOU DIGDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:2294-0028M:\2294\28 Hackamore Road\Hackamore Road Reconstruction Feasibility Study\5_DESIGN\1_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\SITE PLAN.dwg DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:APR 20191ISSUE NO.: APR 2019 FEASIBILITY STUDY 1SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:4/3/2019 2:13:10 PM CLIENT:CITY OFCORCORANHACKAMORE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROJECT TITLE:JTPCHK'D BY:MJSAPP'D BY:KCTCERTIFICATION:1800 PIONEER CREEK CENTERMAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359PHONE: 763-479-4200FAX: 763-479-4242WWW.WENCK.COMCOUNTY RD 116 COUNTY RD 101HACKAMORE RDCORCORANMEDINASB #1SB #2SB #3SB #4SB #5SB #6 5 inches Bituminous over 5 inches Aggregate Base. Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, slightly Organics, dark grey and black, wet. (Buried Topsoil/FILL) Organic Content = 5% (CL) Lean Clay to Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, black and grey, wet, soft. (Alluvium) Organic Content = 4% (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, grey, wet, rather soft. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 13.5 feet. AU 26 SS 27 SS 28 SS 29 SS 30 SS 31 1-4-4 (8) 1-3-3 (6) 1-1-1 (2) 2-2-2 (4) 2-2-3 (5) 19 28 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 987.6 ft LOGGED BY NA DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS - 45 GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PG DATE STARTED 6/13/19 COMPLETED 6/13/19 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-1 CLIENT Wenck PROJECT NUMBER 19-0488 PROJECT NAME Hackamore Road PROJECT LOCATION Corcoran, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 7/10/19 14:03 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\19-0488 HACKAMORE ROAD.GPJHaugo GTS 2825 Cedar Ave South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 5 inches Bituminous over 5 1/2 inches Aggregate Base. Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, Organic, black, wet. (Buried Topsoil) Organic Content = 6% (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and light grey, rust staining, wet, rather stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 11.0 feet. AU 1 SS 2 SS 3 SS 4 SS 5 3-4-7 (11) 1-4-5 (9) 3-5-5 (10) 4-6-8 (14) 23 28 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 996.2 ft LOGGED BY NA DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS - 45 GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PG DATE STARTED 6/13/19 COMPLETED 6/13/19 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-2 CLIENT Wenck PROJECT NUMBER 19-0488 PROJECT NAME Hackamore Road PROJECT LOCATION Corcoran, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 7/10/19 14:03 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\19-0488 HACKAMORE ROAD.GPJHaugo GTS 2825 Cedar Ave South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 4 inches Bituminous over 6 inches Aggregate Base. Sandy Lean Clay, trace Bituminous, black and dark brown, wet. (FILL) (SC) Clayey Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Till) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, reddish brown and grey, wet, stiff. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 11.0 feet. AU 21 SS 22 SS 23 SS 24 SS 25 3-3-6 (9) 3-6-7 (13) 3-6-8 (14) 3-7-7 (14) 15.5 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 1003.5 ft LOGGED BY NA DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS - 45 GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PG DATE STARTED 6/13/19 COMPLETED 6/13/19 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-3 CLIENT Wenck PROJECT NUMBER 19-0488 PROJECT NAME Hackamore Road PROJECT LOCATION Corcoran, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 7/10/19 14:03 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\19-0488 HACKAMORE ROAD.GPJHaugo GTS 2825 Cedar Ave South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 5 inches Bituminous over 5 1/2 inches Aggregate Base. Silty Clay, black, wet. (Buried Topsoil) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, reddish brown and grey, wet, medium to rather stiff. (Glacial Till) LL = 44.4 PL = 30 Bottom of borehole at 11.0 feet. AU 6 SS 7 SS 8 SS 9 SS 10 2-4-6 (10) 2-2-4 (6) 2-5-5 (10) 3-5-7 (12) 24 20.5 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 1010.1 ft LOGGED BY NA DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS - 45 GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PG DATE STARTED 6/13/19 COMPLETED 6/13/19 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-4 CLIENT Wenck PROJECT NUMBER 19-0488 PROJECT NAME Hackamore Road PROJECT LOCATION Corcoran, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 7/10/19 14:03 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\19-0488 HACKAMORE ROAD.GPJHaugo GTS 2825 Cedar Ave South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 3 1/2 inches Bituminous over 5 inches Aggregate Base. (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown, wet. (Glacial Till) (CL-ML) Silty Clay, brown, wet, medium. (Glacial Till) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey, wet, medium to rather stiff. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 11.0 feet. AU 16 SS 17 SS 18 SS 19 SS 20 2-3-4 (7) 2-3-5 (8) 2-4-5 (9) 2-5-5 (10) 35.5 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 986.4 ft LOGGED BY NA DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS - 45 GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PG DATE STARTED 6/13/19 COMPLETED 6/13/19 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-5 CLIENT Wenck PROJECT NUMBER 19-0488 PROJECT NAME Hackamore Road PROJECT LOCATION Corcoran, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 7/10/19 14:03 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\19-0488 HACKAMORE ROAD.GPJHaugo GTS 2825 Cedar Ave South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 7 inches Bituminous over 5 inches Aggregate Base. (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and light grey, rust staining, wet, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) LL = 34.7 PL = 25 Bottom of borehole at 11.0 feet. AU 11 SS 12 SS 13 SS 14 SS 15 3-5-4 (9) 2-4-7 (11) 2-5-7 (12) 3-6-6 (12) 16 17 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 978.5 ft LOGGED BY NA DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS - 45 GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PG DATE STARTED 6/13/19 COMPLETED 6/13/19 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-6 CLIENT Wenck PROJECT NUMBER 19-0488 PROJECT NAME Hackamore Road PROJECT LOCATION Corcoran, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 7/10/19 14:03 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\19-0488 HACKAMORE ROAD.GPJHaugo GTS 2825 Cedar Ave South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 WSB Project:Hackamore Drive Option 1 Design By:LME Project Location:Medina, MN Checked By:JLS City Project No.: WSB Project No:015661-00 Date:6/3/2020 Item No. MnDOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 58,400.00$ 58,400.00$ 2 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.2 20,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 3 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.2 15,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 4 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 676.0 3.00$ 2,028.00$ 5 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 5.00$ 1,250.00$ 6 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 7.00$ 1,750.00$ 7 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 150.0 3.00$ 450.00$ 8 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 14324 2.50$ 35,810.00$ 9 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 4950 8.00$ 39,600.00$ 10 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 3504 8.00$ 28,032.00$ 11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 7878 16.00$ 126,048.00$ 12 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 8595 24.00$ 206,280.00$ 13 2106.507 EXCAVATION - MUCK C Y 954 24.00$ 22,896.00$ 14 2106.507 GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 954 24.00$ 22,896.00$ 15 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 27 300.00$ 8,100.00$ 16 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HOUR 25 175.00$ 4,375.00$ 17 2131.506 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL 1723 3.00$ 5,169.00$ 18 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 1982 30.00$ 59,460.00$ 19 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 6078.0 3.00$ 18,234.00$ 20 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 1310 1.25$ 1,637.50$ 21 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 717 5.00$ 3,585.00$ 22 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 2125 86.00$ 182,750.00$ 23 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 2975 84.00$ 249,900.00$ 24 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - 3.0" THICK S Y 263 50.00$ 13,150.00$ 25 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 250 15.00$ 3,750.00$ 26 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 3 550.00$ 1,650.00$ 27 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 622 16.00$ 9,952.00$ 28 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY S Y 250 60.00$ 15,000.00$ 29 2545.601 RELOCATE UTILITY L S 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 30 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 31 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 32 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 33 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 34 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 35 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 36 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 37 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 500 8.00$ 4,000.00$ 38 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 321 30.00$ 9,630.00$ 39 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 40 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 2912 1.25$ 3,640.00$ 41 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 106 5.00$ 530.00$ 42 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 1249.00 8.00$ 9,992.00$ 43 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1.30 4,000.00$ 5,200.00$ 44 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 5240 1.00$ 5,240.00$ 45 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 50 2.00$ 100.00$ 46 2582.503 DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 2620 1.00$ 2,620.00$ 46 2582.518 CROSSWALK MSSG PAINT S F 216 3.50$ 756.00$ 47 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 72 4.00$ 288.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,225,098.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 122,509.85$ SUBTOTAL 1,347,608.35$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 336,902.09$ TOTAL 1,685,000.00$ WETLAND MITIGATION COST 26,166.00$ A. Roadway Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 OPINION OF PROBABLE COST 48 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 7,700.00$ 7,700.00$ 49 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.1 20,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 50 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.1 15,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 51 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 1288 8.00$ 10,304.00$ 52 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 548 8.00$ 4,384.00$ 53 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 470 30.00$ 14,100.00$ 54 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 2575 30.00$ 77,250.00$ 55 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 400 10.00$ 4,000.00$ 56 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 64 50.00$ 3,200.00$ 57 2540.618 RETAINING WALL S F 375 75.00$ 28,125.00$ 58 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 161 30.00$ 4,830.00$ 59 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 1456 1.25$ 1,820.00$ 60 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 34 5.00$ 170.00$ 61 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.4 4,000.00$ 1,600.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 160,983.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 16,098.30$ SUBTOTAL 177,081.30$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 44,270.33$ TOTAL 221,000.00$ 62 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 10,500.00$ 10,500.00$ 63 2105.601 DEWATERING L S 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 64 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 4)L S 1 88,800.00$ 88,800.00$ 65 2130.610 UTILITY CREW HOUR 8 800.00$ 6,400.00$ 66 2451.607 PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL C Y 28 16.00$ 448.00$ 67 2501.502 18" PIPE APRON EACH 4 300.00$ 1,200.00$ 68 2501.502 24" PIPE APRON EACH 4 500.00$ 2,000.00$ 69 2501.503 18" PIPE CULVERT L F 60 65.00$ 3,900.00$ 70 2501.503 24" PIPE CULVERT L F 72 85.00$ 6,120.00$ 71 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 60.00$ 18,000.00$ 72 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 500 70.00$ 35,000.00$ 73 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 144 90.00$ 12,960.00$ 74 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 5 750.00$ 3,750.00$ 75 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 24 500.00$ 12,000.00$ 76 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 L F 6 600.00$ 3,600.00$ 77 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 6 2,500.00$ 15,000.00$ 78 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III C Y 28 100.00$ 2,800.00$ 79 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS IV C Y 48 150.00$ 7,200.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 231,678.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (25%) 57,919.50$ SUBTOTAL 289,597.50$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (0%) 72,399.38$ TOTAL 362,000.00$ C. Storm Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 B. Trail Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 80 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 78,700.00$ 78,700.00$ 81 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.3 20,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 82 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.3 15,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 83 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 972.0 3.00$ 2,916.00$ 84 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 5.00$ 1,250.00$ 85 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 7.00$ 1,750.00$ 86 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 150.0 3.00$ 450.00$ 87 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 20612 2.50$ 51,530.00$ 88 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 7123 8.00$ 56,984.00$ 89 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 5042 8.00$ 40,336.00$ 90 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 11337 16.00$ 181,392.00$ 91 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 12368 24.00$ 296,832.00$ 92 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 38 300.00$ 11,400.00$ 93 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HOUR 25 175.00$ 4,375.00$ 94 2131.506 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL 2480 3.00$ 7,440.00$ 95 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 2852 30.00$ 85,560.00$ 96 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 8746.0 3.00$ 26,238.00$ 97 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 1855 1.25$ 2,318.75$ 98 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 1031 5.00$ 5,155.00$ 99 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 3057 86.00$ 262,902.00$ 100 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 4280 84.00$ 359,520.00$ 101 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - 3.0" THICK S Y 263 50.00$ 13,150.00$ 102 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 250 15.00$ 3,750.00$ 103 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 3 550.00$ 1,650.00$ 104 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 1206 16.00$ 19,296.00$ 105 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY S Y 250 60.00$ 15,000.00$ 106 2545.601 RELOCATE UTILITY L S 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 107 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 108 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 109 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 110 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 111 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 112 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 113 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 114 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 500 8.00$ 4,000.00$ 115 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 454 30.00$ 13,620.00$ 116 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 117 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 4123 1.25$ 5,153.75$ 118 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 150 5.00$ 750.00$ 119 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 1769.00 8.00$ 14,152.00$ 120 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1.8 4,000.00$ 7,200.00$ 121 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 7420 1.00$ 7,420.00$ 122 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 50 2.00$ 100.00$ 123 2582.503 DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 3710 1.00$ 3,710.00$ 123 2582.518 CROSSWALK MSSG PAINT S F 216 3.50$ 756.00$ 124 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 72 4.00$ 288.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,651,494.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 165,149.45$ SUBTOTAL 1,816,643.95$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 454,160.99$ TOTAL 2,271,000.00$ WETLAND MITIGATION COST 104,316.00$ 125 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 8,900.00$ 8,900.00$ 126 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.1 20,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 127 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.1 15,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 128 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 1853 8.00$ 14,824.00$ 129 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 789 8.00$ 6,312.00$ 130 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 677 30.00$ 20,310.00$ 131 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 3706 30.00$ 111,180.00$ 132 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 400 10.00$ 4,000.00$ 133 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 64 50.00$ 3,200.00$ 134 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 227 30.00$ 6,810.00$ 135 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 2062 1.25$ 2,577.50$ 136 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 47 5.00$ 235.00$ 137 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 185,848.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 18,584.85$ SUBTOTAL 204,433.35$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 51,108.34$ TOTAL 256,000.00$ D. Roadway Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 E. Trail Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 138 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 5,300.00$ 5,300.00$ 139 2105.601 DEWATERING L S 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 140 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 1)L S 1 -$ -$ 141 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 2)L S 1 41,200.00$ 41,200.00$ 142 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 3N)L S 1 58,500.00$ 58,500.00$ 143 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 3S)L S 1 55,900.00$ 55,900.00$ 144 2130.610 UTILITY CREW HOUR 8 800.00$ 6,400.00$ 145 2451.607 PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL C Y 42 16.00$ 672.00$ 146 2501.502 18" PIPE APRON EACH 10 300.00$ 3,000.00$ 147 2501.502 24" PIPE APRON EACH 2 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 148 2501.503 18" PIPE CULVERT L F 150 65.00$ 9,750.00$ 149 2501.503 24" PIPE CULVERT L F 36 85.00$ 3,060.00$ 150 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 60.00$ 18,000.00$ 151 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 500 70.00$ 35,000.00$ 152 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 144 90.00$ 12,960.00$ 153 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 4 750.00$ 3,000.00$ 154 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 24 500.00$ 12,000.00$ 155 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 8 2,500.00$ 20,000.00$ 156 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III C Y 70 100.00$ 7,000.00$ 157 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS IV C Y 24 150.00$ 3,600.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 298,342.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (25%) 74,585.50$ SUBTOTAL 372,927.50$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 93,231.88$ TOTAL 466,000.00$ 158 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 17,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 159 2565.601 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 367,500.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 36,750.00$ SUBTOTAL 404,250.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 101,062.50$ TOTAL 505,000.00$ 160 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 2,600.00$ 2,600.00$ 161 2231.604 BITUMINOUS PATCHING S Y 167 150.00$ 25,050.00$ 162 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350.0 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 163 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 211 2.50$ 527.50$ 164 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 58 12.00$ 696.00$ 165 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 78 12.00$ 936.00$ 166 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 116 16.00$ 1,856.00$ 167 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 127 36.00$ 4,572.00$ 168 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 1 600.00$ 600.00$ 169 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 55 40.00$ 2,200.00$ 170 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 11 5.00$ 55.00$ 171 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 19 120.00$ 2,280.00$ 172 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 26 118.00$ 3,068.00$ 173 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 174 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 175 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 35.00$ 1,400.00$ 176 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 84 3.50$ 294.00$ 177 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 84 2.00$ 168.00$ 178 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 179 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 36.0 12.00$ 432.00$ 180 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 181 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 2.00$ 900.00$ 182 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 53,425.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 5,342.55$ SUBTOTAL 58,768.05$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 14,692.01$ TOTAL 73,000.00$ G1. Intersection Costs - CR 116 Signal F. Storm Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 G2. Intersection Costs - CR 116 North Turn Lanes 183 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 184 2231.604 BITUMINOUS PATCHING S Y 167 150.00$ 25,050.00$ 185 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350.0 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 186 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 265 2.50$ 662.50$ 187 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 73 12.00$ 876.00$ 188 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 97 12.00$ 1,164.00$ 189 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 146 16.00$ 2,336.00$ 190 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 159 36.00$ 5,724.00$ 191 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 1 600.00$ 600.00$ 192 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 68 40.00$ 2,720.00$ 193 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 14 5.00$ 70.00$ 194 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 24 120.00$ 2,880.00$ 195 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 32 118.00$ 3,776.00$ 196 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 197 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 198 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 35.00$ 1,400.00$ 199 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 84 3.50$ 294.00$ 200 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 84 2.00$ 168.00$ 201 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 202 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 36.0 12.00$ 432.00$ 203 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 204 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 2.00$ 900.00$ 205 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 57,643.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 5,764.35$ SUBTOTAL 63,407.85$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 15,851.96$ TOTAL 79,000.00$ 206 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 17,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 207 2565.601 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 367,500.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 36,750.00$ SUBTOTAL 404,250.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 101,062.50$ TOTAL 505,000.00$ 208 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 13,000.00$ 13,000.00$ 209 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 3214.0 3.00$ 9,642.00$ 210 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350.0 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 211 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 3214 2.50$ 8,035.00$ 212 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 884 8.00$ 7,072.00$ 213 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 1179 8.00$ 9,432.00$ 214 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 1768 16.00$ 28,288.00$ 215 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 1928 24.00$ 46,272.00$ 216 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 3.0 300.00$ 900.00$ 217 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 826 30.00$ 24,780.00$ 218 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 640 1.25$ 800.00$ 219 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 161 5.00$ 805.00$ 220 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 286 86.00$ 24,596.00$ 221 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 382 84.00$ 32,088.00$ 222 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 200 15.00$ 3,000.00$ 223 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 4 550.00$ 2,200.00$ 224 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 72 60.00$ 4,320.00$ 225 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 70.00$ 21,000.00$ 226 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 2 750.00$ 1,500.00$ 227 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 12 500.00$ 6,000.00$ 228 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 2 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 229 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 704 16.00$ 11,264.00$ 230 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 231 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 232 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 233 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 234 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 235 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 250 2.50$ 625.00$ 236 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 250 2.50$ 625.00$ 237 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 100 8.00$ 800.00$ 238 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 30.00$ 1,200.00$ 239 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 240 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 356 1.25$ 445.00$ 241 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 242 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 153.0 8.00$ 1,224.00$ 243 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 244 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 1.00$ 450.00$ 245 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 280,904.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 28,090.40$ SUBTOTAL 308,994.40$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 77,248.60$ TOTAL 386,000.00$ H1. Intersection Costs - CR 101 Signal G3. Intersection Costs - CR 116 South Turn Lanes H2. Intersection Costs - CR 47 Turn Lanes & Approach WSB Project:Hackamore Drive Option 2 Design By:LME Project Location:Medina, MN Checked By:JLS City Project No.: WSB Project No:015661-00 Date:6/3/2020 Item No. MnDOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 51,800.00$ 51,800.00$ 2 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.2 20,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 3 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.2 15,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 4 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 676.0 3.00$ 2,028.00$ 5 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 5.00$ 1,250.00$ 6 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 7.00$ 1,750.00$ 7 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 150.0 3.00$ 450.00$ 8 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 12056 2.50$ 30,140.00$ 9 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 4950 8.00$ 39,600.00$ 10 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 3504 8.00$ 28,032.00$ 11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 6631 16.00$ 106,096.00$ 12 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 7234 24.00$ 173,616.00$ 13 2106.507 EXCAVATION - MUCK C Y 954 24.00$ 22,896.00$ 14 2106.507 GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 954 24.00$ 22,896.00$ 15 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 27 300.00$ 8,100.00$ 16 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HOUR 25 175.00$ 4,375.00$ 17 2131.506 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL 1723 3.00$ 5,169.00$ 18 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 1668 30.00$ 50,040.00$ 19 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 6078.0 3.00$ 18,234.00$ 20 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 1310 1.25$ 1,637.50$ 21 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 603 5.00$ 3,015.00$ 22 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 1788 86.00$ 153,768.00$ 23 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 2504 84.00$ 210,336.00$ 24 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - 3.0" THICK S Y 263 50.00$ 13,150.00$ 25 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 250 15.00$ 3,750.00$ 26 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 3 550.00$ 1,650.00$ 27 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 922 16.00$ 14,752.00$ 28 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY S Y 250 60.00$ 15,000.00$ 29 2545.601 RELOCATE UTILITY L S 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 30 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 31 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 32 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 33 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 34 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 35 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 36 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 37 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 500 8.00$ 4,000.00$ 38 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 321 30.00$ 9,630.00$ 39 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 40 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 2912 1.25$ 3,640.00$ 41 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 106 5.00$ 530.00$ 42 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 1249.00 8.00$ 9,992.00$ 43 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1.30 4,000.00$ 5,200.00$ 44 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 5240 1.00$ 5,240.00$ 45 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 50 2.00$ 100.00$ 46 2582.503 DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 2620 1.00$ 2,620.00$ 46 2582.518 CROSSWALK MSSG PAINT S F 216 3.50$ 756.00$ 47 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 72 4.00$ 288.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,086,476.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 108,647.65$ SUBTOTAL 1,195,124.15$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 298,781.04$ TOTAL 1,494,000.00$ WETLAND MITIGATION COST 11,430.00$ A. Roadway Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 OPINION OF PROBABLE COST 48 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 7,900.00$ 7,900.00$ 49 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.1 20,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 50 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.1 15,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 51 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 1331 8.00$ 10,648.00$ 52 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 566 8.00$ 4,528.00$ 53 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 486 30.00$ 14,580.00$ 54 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 2661 30.00$ 79,830.00$ 55 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 400 10.00$ 4,000.00$ 56 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 64 50.00$ 3,200.00$ 57 2540.618 RETAINING WALL S F 375 75.00$ 28,125.00$ 58 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 161 30.00$ 4,830.00$ 59 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 1456 1.25$ 1,820.00$ 60 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 34 5.00$ 170.00$ 61 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.4 4,000.00$ 1,600.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 164,731.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 16,473.10$ SUBTOTAL 181,204.10$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 45,301.03$ TOTAL 227,000.00$ 62 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 10,500.00$ 10,500.00$ 63 2105.601 DEWATERING L S 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 64 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 4)L S 1 88,800.00$ 88,800.00$ 65 2130.610 UTILITY CREW HOUR 8 800.00$ 6,400.00$ 66 2451.607 PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL C Y 28 16.00$ 448.00$ 67 2501.502 18" PIPE APRON EACH 4 300.00$ 1,200.00$ 68 2501.502 24" PIPE APRON EACH 4 500.00$ 2,000.00$ 69 2501.503 18" PIPE CULVERT L F 60 65.00$ 3,900.00$ 70 2501.503 24" PIPE CULVERT L F 72 85.00$ 6,120.00$ 71 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 60.00$ 18,000.00$ 72 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 500 70.00$ 35,000.00$ 73 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 144 90.00$ 12,960.00$ 74 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 5 750.00$ 3,750.00$ 75 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 24 500.00$ 12,000.00$ 76 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 L F 6 600.00$ 3,600.00$ 77 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 6 2,500.00$ 15,000.00$ 78 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III C Y 28 100.00$ 2,800.00$ 79 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS IV C Y 48 150.00$ 7,200.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 231,678.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (25%) 57,919.50$ SUBTOTAL 289,597.50$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (0%) 72,399.38$ TOTAL 362,000.00$ C. Storm Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 B. Trail Costs - Hackamore Phase 1 80 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 69,500.00$ 69,500.00$ 81 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.3 20,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 82 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.3 15,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 83 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 972.0 3.00$ 2,916.00$ 84 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 5.00$ 1,250.00$ 85 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 250.0 7.00$ 1,750.00$ 86 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 150.0 3.00$ 450.00$ 87 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 17349 2.50$ 43,372.50$ 88 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 7123 8.00$ 56,984.00$ 89 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 5042 8.00$ 40,336.00$ 90 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 9542 16.00$ 152,672.00$ 91 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 10409 24.00$ 249,816.00$ 92 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 38 300.00$ 11,400.00$ 93 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HOUR 25 175.00$ 4,375.00$ 94 2131.506 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL 2480 3.00$ 7,440.00$ 95 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 2400 30.00$ 72,000.00$ 96 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 8746.0 3.00$ 26,238.00$ 97 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 1855 1.25$ 2,318.75$ 98 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 868 5.00$ 4,340.00$ 99 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 2573 86.00$ 221,278.00$ 100 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 3603 84.00$ 302,652.00$ 101 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - 3.0" THICK S Y 263 50.00$ 13,150.00$ 102 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 250 15.00$ 3,750.00$ 103 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 3 550.00$ 1,650.00$ 104 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 1972 16.00$ 31,552.00$ 105 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY S Y 250 60.00$ 15,000.00$ 106 2545.601 RELOCATE UTILITY L S 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 107 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 108 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 109 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 110 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 111 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 112 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 113 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 2000 2.50$ 5,000.00$ 114 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 500 8.00$ 4,000.00$ 115 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 454 30.00$ 13,620.00$ 116 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 117 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 4123 1.25$ 5,153.75$ 118 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 150 5.00$ 750.00$ 119 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 1769.00 8.00$ 14,152.00$ 120 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1.8 4,000.00$ 7,200.00$ 121 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 7420 1.00$ 7,420.00$ 122 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 50 2.00$ 100.00$ 123 2582.503 DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 3710 1.00$ 3,710.00$ 123 2582.518 CROSSWALK MSSG PAINT S F 216 3.50$ 756.00$ 124 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 72 4.00$ 288.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,457,790.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 145,779.00$ SUBTOTAL 1,603,569.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 400,892.25$ TOTAL 2,004,000.00$ WETLAND MITIGATION COST 71,394.00$ 125 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 9,200.00$ 9,200.00$ 126 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.1 20,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 127 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.1 15,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 128 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 1915 8.00$ 15,320.00$ 129 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 815 8.00$ 6,520.00$ 130 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 699 30.00$ 20,970.00$ 131 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 3830 30.00$ 114,900.00$ 132 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 400 10.00$ 4,000.00$ 133 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 64 50.00$ 3,200.00$ 134 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 227 30.00$ 6,810.00$ 135 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 2062 1.25$ 2,577.50$ 136 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 47 5.00$ 235.00$ 137 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 191,232.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 19,123.25$ SUBTOTAL 210,355.75$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 52,588.94$ TOTAL 263,000.00$ E. Trail Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 D. Roadway Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 138 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 13,100.00$ 13,100.00$ 139 2105.601 DEWATERING L S 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 140 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 1)L S 1 -$ -$ 141 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 2)L S 1 41,200.00$ 41,200.00$ 142 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 3N)L S 1 58,500.00$ 58,500.00$ 143 2106.601 POND CONSTRUCTION (BMP 3S)L S 1 55,900.00$ 55,900.00$ 144 2130.610 UTILITY CREW HOUR 8 800.00$ 6,400.00$ 145 2451.607 PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL C Y 42 16.00$ 672.00$ 146 2501.502 18" PIPE APRON EACH 10 300.00$ 3,000.00$ 147 2501.502 24" PIPE APRON EACH 2 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 148 2501.503 18" PIPE CULVERT L F 150 65.00$ 9,750.00$ 149 2501.503 24" PIPE CULVERT L F 36 85.00$ 3,060.00$ 150 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 60.00$ 18,000.00$ 151 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 500 70.00$ 35,000.00$ 152 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 144 90.00$ 12,960.00$ 153 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 4 750.00$ 3,000.00$ 154 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 24 500.00$ 12,000.00$ 155 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 8 2,500.00$ 20,000.00$ 156 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III C Y 70 100.00$ 7,000.00$ 157 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS IV C Y 24 150.00$ 3,600.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 306,142.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (25%) 76,535.50$ SUBTOTAL 382,677.50$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 95,669.38$ TOTAL 478,000.00$ 158 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 17,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 159 2565.601 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 367,500.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 36,750.00$ SUBTOTAL 404,250.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 101,062.50$ TOTAL 505,000.00$ 160 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 2,600.00$ 2,600.00$ 161 2231.604 BITUMINOUS PATCHING S Y 167 150.00$ 25,050.00$ 162 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350.0 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 163 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 211 2.50$ 527.50$ 164 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 58 12.00$ 696.00$ 165 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 78 12.00$ 936.00$ 166 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 116 16.00$ 1,856.00$ 167 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 127 36.00$ 4,572.00$ 168 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 1 300.00$ 300.00$ 169 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 55 40.00$ 2,200.00$ 170 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 11 5.00$ 55.00$ 171 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 19 120.00$ 2,280.00$ 172 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 26 118.00$ 3,068.00$ 173 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 174 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 175 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 35.00$ 1,400.00$ 176 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 84 3.50$ 294.00$ 177 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 84 2.00$ 168.00$ 178 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 179 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 36.0 12.00$ 432.00$ 180 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 181 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 2.00$ 900.00$ 182 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 53,125.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 5,312.55$ SUBTOTAL 58,438.05$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 14,609.51$ TOTAL 73,000.00$ G2. Intersection Costs - CR 116 North Turn Lanes F. Storm Costs - Hackamore Phase 2 & 3 G1. Intersection Costs - CR 116 Signal 183 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 184 2231.604 BITUMINOUS PATCHING S Y 167 150.00$ 25,050.00$ 185 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 186 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 265 2.50$ 662.50$ 187 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 73 12.00$ 876.00$ 188 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 97 12.00$ 1,164.00$ 189 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 146 16.00$ 2,336.00$ 190 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 159 36.00$ 5,724.00$ 191 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 1 300.00$ 300.00$ 192 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 68 40.00$ 2,720.00$ 193 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 14 5.00$ 70.00$ 194 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 24 120.00$ 2,880.00$ 195 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 32 118.00$ 3,776.00$ 196 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 197 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 198 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 35.00$ 1,400.00$ 199 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 84 3.50$ 294.00$ 200 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 84 2.00$ 168.00$ 201 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 202 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 36.0 12.00$ 432.00$ 203 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 204 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 2.00$ 900.00$ 205 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 57,343.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 5,734.35$ SUBTOTAL 63,077.85$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 15,769.46$ TOTAL 79,000.00$ 206 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 17,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 207 2565.601 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 367,500.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 36,750.00$ SUBTOTAL 404,250.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 101,062.50$ TOTAL 505,000.00$ 208 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 13,000.00$ 13,000.00$ 209 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 3214 3.00$ 9,642.00$ 210 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 350 3.00$ 1,050.00$ 211 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 3214 2.50$ 8,035.00$ 212 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y 884 8.00$ 7,072.00$ 213 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 1179 8.00$ 9,432.00$ 214 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 1768 16.00$ 28,288.00$ 215 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 1928 24.00$ 46,272.00$ 216 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 3.0 300.00$ 900.00$ 217 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 826 30.00$ 24,780.00$ 218 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 640 1.25$ 800.00$ 219 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 161 5.00$ 805.00$ 220 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 286 86.00$ 24,596.00$ 221 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 382 84.00$ 32,088.00$ 222 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 200 15.00$ 3,000.00$ 223 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 4 550.00$ 2,200.00$ 224 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 72 60.00$ 4,320.00$ 225 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 300 70.00$ 21,000.00$ 226 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 2 750.00$ 1,500.00$ 227 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 12 500.00$ 6,000.00$ 228 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3') EACH 2 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 229 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 704 16.00$ 11,264.00$ 230 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 231 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 300.00$ 1,500.00$ 232 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 45 60.00$ 2,700.00$ 233 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 234 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 235 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 250 2.50$ 625.00$ 236 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 250 2.50$ 625.00$ 237 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 100 8.00$ 800.00$ 238 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 40 30.00$ 1,200.00$ 239 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 500 2.50$ 1,250.00$ 240 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 356 1.25$ 445.00$ 241 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 9 5.00$ 45.00$ 242 2575.604 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 153.0 8.00$ 1,224.00$ 243 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 0.1 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 244 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 450 1.00$ 450.00$ 245 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 24 4.00$ 96.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 280,904.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) 28,090.40$ SUBTOTAL 308,994.40$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%) 77,248.60$ TOTAL 386,000.00$ H2. Intersection Costs - CR 47 Turn Lanes & Approach H1. Intersection Costs - CR 101 Signal G3. Intersection Costs - CR 116 South Turn Lanes 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Agenda: ECWMC Pre-Application Meeting (Virtual) - Minutes Project: Hackamore Road Improvement Project Date: April 23, 2020 Proj. No.: WSB Project No. 015661-000 Attendees: See Below 1. Introductions City of Medina: Dusty Finke, Steve Scherer City of Corcoran: Kevin Mattson WSB: Heather Nelson, Jim Stremel Elm Creek: Jim Kujawa, Joe Waln 2. Project Location a. Hackamore Road west of CR116 and just past CR101 3. Scope a. Joint project between City of Medina and City of Corcoran b. Current Scope is for 30% & 75% Design for roadway, trail, intersections, stormwater management c. Project is proposed to be constructed in phases, discuss permitting in phases. · The easterly portion is proposed for construction in 2021, the westerly phases will be driven in large part by development occurring in subsequent years, possibly within 5 years. · Full design for the project up to 75%, eastern phase will be 100% design. · Greater than 5 years’ timeline may have an issue with the commission getting permitted. · Work the BMPs with adjacent developments. · Potential for BMPs within adjacent developments could be approved as a condition to the watershed permit. 4. Anticipated ECWMC Permitting Needs a. Potential Culvert replacements · DNR and ECWMC both require permit for extension or replacement City of Medina and City of Corcoran - Hackamore Road Improvement Project ECWMC Pre-Application Meeting – 4/23/2020 – Meeting Minutes Page 2 · Watershed would require that the conveyance for the 2, 10, and 100- year events are the same if the culverts are replaced. b. New Impervious – Approximately 5 Acres · Road widening to include turn lanes · Trail Construction, there is no exception for a linear trail installation with turf boulevard. c. BMP locations · Provide rate control and water quality volume · Discussion on BMP locations with phased project approach. · BMP mass balance, individual drainage areas be treated if possible. · For a linear project, the watershed would look at this project with a “mass balance” concept for the whole corridor. · The watershed suggested protecting the Manage 1 wetland at the SE quad of CR116, possibly with the use of curb/CB’s to direct runoff to the north. d. Wetland Delineation has been prepared for the right of way areas e. No FEMA floodplain impacts are anticipated 5. Schedule a. Anticipate submittal of the permit application to ECWMC by July 2020 b. Construction start 2021 for Phase 1 (from about Steeplechase to the east) 6. Questions, Clarifications, Other 7. Adjourn 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Agenda: Large Agency Group Coordination Meeting - Minutes Project: Hackamore Road Improvement Project Date: April 27, 2020 Proj. No.: 015661-000 Attendees: See below 1. Introductions City of Medina: Dusty Finke, Steve Scherer City of Corcoran: Kevin Mattson, Brad Martens City of Plymouth: Michael Thompson, Chris LaBounty City of Maple Grove: John Hagen Hennepin County: Jason Gottfried, Jonathan Krieg WSB: Chuck Rickart, Lydia Ener, Jim Stremel 2. Scope & Project Location a. Joint project between City of Corcoran and City of Medina b. Hackamore Rd from Medina Lk Dr (west extents) to CR 101 (east extents) in including the approach to CR 101 from CR 47 c. Current engineering scope is 30% & 75% Design for roadway, trail, intersections, stormwater management. d. Project is proposed to be constructed in phases, with the easterly half (Phase 1) scheduled for 2021 construction. 3. Geometric Design (30%) a. Two geometric options being reviewed for 30% · Three lane option · Two lane option with dedicated turn lanes · No significant difference between CR 101 and CR 116 intersections with either option · 40 MPH design speed b. Traffic counts and analysis (turn lanes, intersection design) c. Trail alignment review, proposed on north side d. Initial stormwater management considerations, looking for coordination with adjacent developments on Corcoran side (Eaglebrook Church, Lennar, Gonyea) 4. Intersection at CR 101/CR 47 a. Hackamore geometric review b. CR 47 Corridor study/status · City of Plymouth has received final draft comments from Hennepin Co. · Timing of proposed improvements, study was scoping document, City of Corcoran/Medina - Hackamore Rd Improvement Project – Large Agency Group Coordination - Minutes April 27, 2020 Page 2 · Pedestrian improvements and connection to destinations a priority for the public, speed reduction is also a priority, most of corridor is a two-lane version with dedicated turn lanes · Development at SE quadrant (Weston Ridge development) is being considered. · City of Plymouth has grant funding for trail to the southeast (funds only for 101 and not for CR 47), the trail located along CR 101 south of the intersection. · Hackamore matching proposed layout in draft plan · Interim basis design, transition/matching existing section on CR 47 · Right of way impacts, trail close to ROW on Maple Grove side b. Eaglebrook Church concept plan/access discussion at the NW quadrant of CR 101 c. Signal relocation/adjustments d. Cost share considerations · City of Medina asked about signal cost participation for relocations, County will need to weigh in on that with others from their design group. e. County comments: overhead power lines would be in the way of the signal luminaires (now a standard with the County). If overhead power cannot be put underground, then other lighting alternatives may be necessary. f. City of Plymouth has had extensive discussions with property owners and they would like the pedestrian access built with the CR 47 turnback. 5. Intersection at CR 116 a. Hackamore geometric review, NB/SB right turn lanes b. Adjacent development in the NW and NE quadrants · Timing of proposed developments · Access to Hackamore b. Right of way impacts c. Signal relocation/adjustments d. Cost share considerations · SB right turn lane, development responsible (Wessel) for cost sharing · NB right turn lane not necessarily specific development driven improvement 6. Stakeholder Engagement a. Large Group Meetings with County, cities of Plymouth/Maple Grove b. Project meetings every two weeks (City of Medina/Plymouth) c. MyLink site for project d. Community engagement activities 7. Next Steps a. Further design of both options, Corcoran/Medina select preferred option b. Design concurrence with County/cities at CR 116/101 c. 75% design of preferred option, determine project costs/funding d. Provide County with formal request for cost sharing at either the June or July 2020 meeting. Could take up to 6 months for agreement to be finalized. City of Corcoran/Medina - Hackamore Rd Improvement Project – Large Agency Group Coordination - Minutes April 27, 2020 Page 3 8. Schedule 30 % Design Services Kick-Off Meeting with Cities ................................................................................ March 12, 2020 Field Work (Traffic Counts, Remaining Topographic Survey) .................................. March 2020 1st Large Stakeholder Meeting (Plymouth, County, Both Cities) ......................... Late April 2020 Complete 30% Level of Geometric Design ........................................................ Early May 2020 Utility Company Notifications/Meeting (if needed)....................................................... May 2020 Evaluate Initial Right of Way Needs ............................................................................ May 2020 Community Engagement Event ............................................................................ Mid May 2020 Draft 30% Memoranda to Cities (Review and Comment) .................................... Mid May 2020 1st Set of City Council Meetings (30% Design Review/Input) ............................ Early June 2020 Final 30% Memoranda to Cities ..................................................................... by Mid-June 2020 75 % Design Services Begin 75% Level of Design ........................................................................................ June 2020 2nd Large Stakeholder Meeting (Plymouth, County, Both Cities) ...... Late June/Early July 2020 Evaluate Final Right of Way Needs .............................................................................. July 2020 Draft of 75% Memoranda to Cities (Review and Comment) ................................... August 2020 2nd Set of City Council Meetings (75% Design Review/Input) ........ Late July/Early August 2020 Provide Final 75% Memoranda to Cities ........................................................ Early August 2020 Complete 75% Level of Design/Plans .................................................................... August 2020 9. Questions, Clarifications, Other a. Action items (WSB): · Summary request to Jason and CC John Krieg so they can begin the discussion internally (Complete). · Schedule a follow-up meeting during 75% design · Formal request to County for cost sharing at June or July board meeting 10. Adjourn City of Corcoran & City of MedinaHackamore Road Reconstruction Project - 30% DesignPublic Engagement Activity - Map Comparison/Comments on Social PinpointComments to date: June 3, 2020Created on Type of Comment Map Option CommentUp Votes Down Votes First Name2020-06-03 10:51:35 +1000Something I LikeOption 1There is access from 101 which should be the primary entrance to the development.00Maureen2020-06-03 10:48:07 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 1Absolutely agree. These developments shouldn't be destroying our small town feel. They have access to their developments from 116 and 101.0 0 Maureen2020-06-03 10:45:13 +1000 Make a Comment Option 1Dusty..Less wetland impact on the north side? There is virtually nothing on the south side east of Hackamore Circle. Except Wild Meadows. Does that have anything to do with this rational?0 0 Maureen2020-06-02 07:51:53 +1000Something I LikeOption 1Walking path for safety is nice00Jimmy2020-06-02 07:50:58 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 1This is a small unused road that many families use today to run, walk, and bike. You should consider adding lanes on pinto into the neighborhood rather than increasing traffic on Hackamore. There should also be green space on both sides of the road or at least the south where there is already a current nice housing community. Create buffers on both sides of the road please2 0 Jimmy2020-06-02 00:31:37 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 1There isn't any need for a turn lane into Hackamore Cir --only four families live here, and some are retirees with no children.1 0 John2020-05-30 06:49:32 +1000Something I DislikeOption 1I agree, no turn lanes needed!002020-05-28 02:48:31 +1000 Make a Comment Option 1Some of the initial rationale for the trail on the north side:1) There is likely going to be a higher population along the north side of Hackamore, providing the opportunity for the greater amount of people to access the trail w/o crossing Hackamore.2) The trail may be able to be incorporated into adjacent developments in Corcoran, potentially making it easier to have more space from the street.3) It is anticipated there may be less wetland impacts on the north side.- Dusty Finke, Medina0 02020-05-28 02:43:03 +1000 Make a Comment Option 1Thank you for your comments! The primary difference between the two options is that Option 1 provides a continuous left turn lane to each street and driveway. Option 2 provides left-turn lanes only for the more traveled roadways. As a result, Option 1 is generally wider. - Dusty Finke, City of Medina0 02020-05-27 03:56:21 +1000 Make a Comment Option 1Agreed. It seems most of the traffic would be coming/going toward the south on both Pinto and Brockton. Putting the trail on the south side of Hackamore would prevent more road crossings and be much safer.0 02020-05-27 03:51:54 +1000Something I LikeOption 1This will be important to have dedicated turn lanes for such a large development as The Reserve112020-05-25 03:47:48 +1000 Make a Comment Option 1It's a little difficult to see enough from these options but it appears to me that the majority of the construction in both is taking place on the Corcoran side. Why is that? There's plenty of space on the other side (Medina) for trails and green space.In addition, I'm assuming you are planning to move all the mailboxes that are on Hackamore to the houses with all these changes.1 1 Maureen2020-05-20 12:09:52 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 1Hackamore Road does not need to be turned into a through street handling a lot of traffic. There are other options for getting to 101 and 116. Corcoran is allowing and encouraging the loss of the charm of the area in its entirety!4 0 Maureen2020-05-20 07:42:20 +1000Something I DislikeOption 1No turning lanes here10Fred2020-05-19 23:59:47 +1000 Ideas and Suggestions Option 1Due to future development , safety and low cost of small addition I think the project should be extended to a new intersection at 62nd and Snyder Road. This will eliminate a nothing road project in the near future.2 0 Dennis2020-06-03 10:55:22 +1000Something I DislikeOption 2Getting the impression that our opinions don't matter because we are Corcoran....00Maureen2020-06-02 07:54:06 +1000Ideas and SuggestionsOption 2Preference is option #2, but would still like to seen green space on the south side of hackamore west of 11600Jimmy 2020-06-02 07:04:50 +1000 Something I Like Option 2I'm glad to see a trail on both options. This is really needed for safety for walking/running/biking. Hoping that it will eventually be able to connect out to the NW Greenway!0 02020-06-02 00:39:37 +1000 Something I Dislike Option 2While we like option 2 better, we still have issues, specifically how much of our land will be taken (do you REALLY need this much or ANY green space?) but mostly our issue is water, water, water. Drain flow in our ditch is terrible right now, with much standing water for days and days after a rain. You MUST solve the water flow problem first. How do you intend to handle that with the improvements? We want someone to come out and talk to us BEFORE any decisions are made.1 0 John2020-05-27 07:08:15 +1000 Make a Comment Option 2I would like to work with the city for proper water drainage. Water comes from the east and goes in the drain in the middle of my front yard. Water then goes to the wetland to the south, or to the north through the culvert under Hackamore. I have attached a picture of frequent yearly floods in my front yard. Lots of speeding vehicles. Would be great if we could figure out a way to control the speeders. Getting mail everyday is a dangerous activity.1 0 Ryan STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10a. Council Meeting: June 11, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens, Kevin Mattson Topic: 2020 Fee Schedule Amendments Action Required: Approval Summary: Attached to this report is an amended 2020 Fee Schedule recommended for adoption. The amendments include the following: • Establishing a fee for the future City Planner position • Updated trunk line availability fees o Updated fee for sewer to reflect recently completed analysis of future system needs o Separate and updated fee for water related to the southeast and northeast districts based upon recently completed analysis of future system needs Financial/Budget: Minor costs are incurred for publishing the ordinance updates. Fees generate necessary revenue to pay for costs incurred to the City now and into the future. Options: 1. Approve Ordinance 2020-407 Amending 2020 Fee Schedule 2. Decline the amendment Recommendation: Approve Ordinance 2020-407 Amending 2020 Fee Schedule Council Action: Consider a motion to approve Ordinance 2020-407 Amending 2020 Fee Schedule Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2020-407 Amending 2020 Fee Schedule City of Corcoran June 11, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. – 2020-407 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING 2020 FEE SCHEDULE The Corcoran City Council ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The Corcoran City Council has determined that the fees to be charged by the City for development, inspections, and other related services shall be adopted by ordinance. Section 2. Amendment of 2020 Fee Schedule. The fees to be charged by the City of Corcoran for 2020 are listed on the attached Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein; that said fee schedule is hereby adopted. Section 3. Continuation/Amendment. Any amendment to the fee schedule shall be made annually, or more often if necessary, by ordinance; if there are no amendments to the fee schedule, the most recently adopted fee schedule ordinance shall remain in force and effect until amended. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its publication and passage. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 11th day of June 2020 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Anderson, Tom Anderson, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan _______________________________ Ron Thomas, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise, Administrative Services Director CITY OF CORCORAN Draft 2020 FEE SCHEDULE FEE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE SCHEDULE G/L Records & Service for City Document (Includes Tax) 100-41900-34107 Assessment Search from County 25.00 100-41900-34000 USB Flash Drive 10.00 100-41900-36210 Interest charge on 30 day past due Escrow accounts 10% 100-41900-34105 Notary Fee - per document 1.00 100-41900-34105 Candidate Filing Fee 10.00 Code Books 100-41900-34105 Code Book (Codes/Zoning/Subd) Binder 65.00 100-41900-34105 Municipal Code Only 35.00 100-41900-34105 Subdivision Code Only 35.00 100-41900-34105 Zoning Code Only 35.00 100-41900-34105 Comprehensive Plan Book Printed - special order 100.00 Copies 100-41900-34105 Copies black/white - up to 8 1/2x14 per page 0.25 100-41900-34105 Copies black/white - 11 x 17 per page 0.55 100-41900-34105 Copies Color up to 8 1/2x14 pp 1.00 100-41900-34105 Copies Color 11x17 1.50 100-41900-34105 Copies Oversize (Larger than 11X17) - Special Order Varies Labor/Staff Research 100-41900-34000 Data Request Retrieval Cost per hour Salary of the lowest- paid entity employee who can complete the task 100-41900-34000 Normal Business Hrs (1 hr minimum) per hour 65.00 100-41900-34000 After Hours (1 hr minimum) per hour 100.00 Late Fees / Penalties /Processing Fees 100-41941-36200 Returned Check Fee 38.00 100-41941-36200 Delinquent Fee 10.00 100-42400-36200 Permit Cancellation Fee 25.00 Credit Card Processing Fee - Transactions under $100.00 N/C Credit Card Processing Fee - Transactions over $100.00 3.49% less $3.49 Maps 100-41900-34105 Color Maps - on cardstock 3.00 100-41900-34105 Oversized or Laminated - special order Varies 100-41900-34105 Topos - special order Varies Recycling Fee 100-43232-34400 Recycling Fee - Annually 39.59 100-43232-34400 Recycling Delinquent Fee 10.00 100-43232-34400 Recycling Provider Late Fee 1.5% per month City Park - Picnic Facility 100-45200-34101 Rental Fee 100.00 100-45200-34101 Damage Deposit 350.00 100-45200-34101 Soccer/Football/Baseball - per field (6 hour usage)30.00 100-45200-34101 Lights (Lions field only) - Additional per game 30.00 100-45200-34101 Tennis Courts - All courts 4 hour usage 30.00 100-45200-34101 Fields/Tennis Courts Damage Deposit (per season, all groups)350.00 100-45200-34101 Photography Rental - Community Garden (3 hour maximum)25.00 Engraved Memorial Bricks (tax included) 415-45200-36230 4 x 8 Engraved Brick 50.00 415-45200-36230 12 x 12 Engraved Brick 100.00 415-45200-36230 Engraved Stone (Large)135.00 415-45200-36230 Engraved Stone (X-Large)175.00 415-45200-36230 48" Maintenance Free Bench Varies* 415-45200-36230 Concrete Bench - 22 Characters Varies* 415-45200-36230 Granite Bench Varies* *Product and prices subject to change with vendors Administrative Fees - Rentals 100-41941-34101 Mutiple Date Change Fee (1 Date Change Per Year Free)10.00 Licenses & Miscellaneous Permits Liquor/Tobacco/Lawful Gambling License/Permit 100-41900-32110 Temporary 3.2 Malt Liquor License - 1 - 4 Day Event 25.00 100-41900-32110 Temporary Malt Liquor License - 1 - 4 Day Event 25.00 100-41900-32110 Temporary 3.2 Malt Liquor License - Annual Max 100.00 100-41900-32110 On Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor 100.00 100-41900-32110 Off Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor 25.00 100-41600-32110 Investigation (New/Transfer License)100.00 100-41900-32110 On Sale Intoxicating Liquor 4,000.00 On Sale Wine 2,000.00 100-41900-32110 Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor (Fee limited by State Law)150.00 100-41900-32110 Sunday Sale Intoxicating Liquor (Fee limited by State Law)200.00 100-42100-34202 Investigation Fee (New/Transfer License)300.00 100-41900-32110 2:00 am Closing Paid to State 100-41900-32110 Tobacco License 150.00 100-45200-36200 Fireworks Permit-Per Event 50.00 100-41900-34103 Hobby Kennel - Annual Fee 75.00 Exempt Gambling Permit - Held at Non-Premise Permitted Site N/C Exempt Gambling Permit - Held at a Premise Permitted Site (ie. Conducts Regular Charitable Gambling Activities 50.00 Burning Permit 100-42100-34200 Valid for 1 month 10.00 100-42100-34200 Valid for 6 months 50.00 Driveway Permit 100-43100-34300 Driveway Permit 100.00 Grading & Land Reclamation Permit 100-43100-34300 Under 300 Cubic Yards 35.00 100-43100-34300 Over 300 Cubic Yards - residential 300.00 Escrow Determined by City Engineer for Permits over 300 Cubic Yards 1000.00 Minimum No security fee for under 300 Cubic Yards required N/C Overweight Vehicle Permit Agriculture N/C 100-43100-34300 Commercial Tow Truck 750.00 100-43100-34300 Daily Permit - Non Exempt Emergency 100.00 100-43100-34300 Seasonal - Emergency (Septic, Liquid Propane & Similar)N/C Resident - To and From (5 ton maximum)N/C 100-43100-34300 Seasonal - Home Delivery 250.00 100-43100-34300 No Permit - Double Fee Maximum $300.00 All Charges are Per Truck - Permits are Restricted Sign Permit 100-41900-36200 No Planning Commission Review - Temporary 25.00 100-41900-36200 No Planning Commission Review - Permanent 150.00 Utility Permit 100-43100-34300 Utility Work in the Right-of-Way - IE:Comcast, Century Link, CenterPoint Energy, Wright-Hennepin, etc 100.00 Public Safety G/L Police Reports 100-42100-34202 Police Reports - Per Page 0.25 100-42100-34202 Audio/Video on USB Flash Drive 10.00 100-42100-34202 Normal Business Hrs (1 hr min.) per hour Salary of the lowest- paid entity employee who can complete the task Car Seat Checks Resident N/C Non-Resident - 1st Seat 25.00 Non-Resident - Additional Seats 10.00 Police Patch Police Patch - Available Only to Full-time Police Officers 5.00 Finger Printing Resident - Child N/C 100-42100-34202 Non-Resident - Child 10.00 Resident - Adult N/C 100-42100-34202 Non-Resident - Adult 15.00 Additional Cards - Resident N/C 100-42100-34202 Additional Cards - Non-Resident 5.00 False Alarm Fire Emergency 100-42100-35101 2-3 In any 12-month period ( Each)75.00 100-42100-35101 4+ In any 12-month period (Each)150.00 False Alarm Police 1-3 In any 12-month period N/C 100-42100-35101 4+ In any 12-month period 100.00 Firearm & Hunting Permits 100-42100-34200 Shooting Range Review 20.00 100-42100-34200 Goose Lake Hunting Permit 10.00 100-42100-34200 Permit to Purchase/Transfer N/C Rental Fee 100-42100-34200 Range contract per day (law enforcement agencies only)50.00 100-42100-34200 Command Post per day 50.00 Vehicle Impound 100-42100-34202 Vehicle Impound Release 10.00 100-42100-34202 Storage Fee Weekly 75.00 Animal Impound 100-42100-35101 1st Offense (Plus impound fees to shelter)50.00 100-42100-35101 2nd and Subsequent Offenses (Plus impound fees to shelter)150.00 100-42100-35101 No Kennel License 50.00 Event Security Rates 100-42100-34201 Officer - per hour 90.00 100-42100-34201 Officer - per hour Holiday rate 115.00 201-42100-34201 Reserve Officer - per hour 30.00 *Fee Set By State / **Restricted Emergency Communications Systems Fee Per Single Residential Unit 100.00 Up to 4 Units 200.00 Up to 10 Units 500.00 For Any Number of Units Above 10 Units 1,000.00 Fire Department Entry Key Lock Box DAMA Box and/or Mounting Kits Cost plus 10% Public Works G/L Equipment Usage Per Hour (Government Agency Assistance) 100-43100-36200 Tractor/Backhoe 50.00 100-43100-36200 Dump Truck 65.00 100-43100-36200 Front End Wheel Loader 40.00 100-43100-36200 Road Grader 80.00 100-43100-36200 Skid Loader 40.00 100-43100-36200 Wood Chipper 40.00 Labor 100-43100-36200 Per Hour 65.00 Lawn Mowing - Property Cleanup 100-43100-36200 Mowing 1 acre & under 315.00 100-43100-36200 Mowing over 1 acre - $315 + additional hourly rate 85.00 100-43100-36200 Contract tree and weed removal Cost + 65.00 100-43100-36200 Contract rubbish removal Cost + 65.00 Swing Away Mail Box Arms (Sales Tax included) 100-41941-36200 Post only (mailbox not included)65.00 100-41941-36200 Post and Installation (mailbox not included)150.00 Street Department Fees 100-43100-36200 Street Sign Install Labor (Per hour)75.00 100-43100-34301 Dust Control Assessment Established Annually 100-43100-34301 Dust Control (Voluntary) 300' min.Established Annually 100-43100-34301 Dust Control Delinquent Fee 10.00 100-43100-36200 Culvert priced per foot Cost + 65.00 Local Government Unit Fees Non-Refundable Application Fee Escrow Exemption Certificates 100.00 1000.00 Determinations 100.00 1000.00 Delineation Review 200.00 2000.00 Pond Excavations 100.00 1000.00 Wetland Replacement Plans <10,000 SF Impact on Single Basins or , 1/4 Acre Impact for Private Driveways 400.00 2000.00 All Other Replacement Plans 2,500.00 * Replacement Plan in Conjunction with Wetland Banking 3,500.00 * All Other Wetland Banking Applications 3,500.00 * Monitoring - Per Basin 6,000.00 * Additional Weland Replacement Plan and Banking Escrows and Sureities are determined on a site-specific basis. Wetland Conservation Act Violations (Restoration Order) Any person or entity that fails to obtain a permit under City Ordinance prior to performing work shall pay a penalty of two times the original permit fee and shall be required to pay all costs associated with enforcement, including reasonable attorney’s fees. Planning Development & Zoning Fees Land Use Permit/Application Type Non-Refundable Application Fee Escrow 100-41900-34103 Agriculture Preserve Application - Placement (fee limited by state) 50.00 0.00 100-41900-34103 Agriculture Preserve Application - Removal (fee limited by state) 50.00 0.00 100-41900-34103 Administrative Permit 100.00 1,000.00 Minor Subdivision, Lot Line Adjustment/Consolidation 100.00 1,500.00 100-41900-34103 Certificate of Compliance 80.00 0.00 100-41900-34103 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1,000.00 2,200.00 100-41900-34103 Conditional Use Permit (CUP)550.00 2,200.00 100-41900-34103 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment 200.00 1,000.00 100-41900-34103 Environmental Review 500.00 5,000.00 100-41900-34103 Interim Use Permit 500.00 2,000.00 100-41900-34103 Final Plat – Base Fee Regular / OSP 575.00 5,000.00 100-41900-34103 Final Plat – Per Lot Regular /OSP 50.00 0.00 100-41900-34103 Residential Park Dedication Fees (Subdivision Ordinance) Section 955 100-41900-34103 Single Family Unit 3,970.00 0.00 100-41900-34103 Multi Family Unit 2,694.00 0.00 100-41900-34103 Preliminary Plat – Base Regular /OSP 600.00 5,000.00 100-41900-34103 Preliminary Plat – Per Lot Regular / OSP 50.00 0.00 100-41900-34103 PUD -Preliminary Development Plan 575.00 5,000.00 100-41900-34103 PUD - Final Development Plan 500.00 5,000.00 100-41900-34103 PUD - Sketch Plat/Plan Review 450.00 2,000.00 100-41900-34103 Rezoning 575.00 2,000.00 100-41900-36200 Sign - Wetland Buffer Sign (per sign - requires site inspection)20.00 0.00 100-41900-34103 Sign - Development Notice Sign $165.00 first sign/ $50.00 each additional 165.00 0.00 100-41900-34103 Site Plan 425.00 1,500.00 100-41900-34103 Site Plan Amendment - Minor 200.00 1,000.00 100-41900-34103 Sketch Plat/Plan Review - Regular / OSP 450.00 1,750.00 100-41900-34103 Topography Exemption, Wetland Waiver, Electronic File Waiver 200.00 1,000.00 100-41900-34103 Vacation 350.00 1,000.00 100-41900-34103 Variance 550.00 2,000.00 100-41900-34103 Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment 700.00 2,000.00 100-41900-34103 Meeting with City Consultants (first hour no charge)Over 1 hour Contract fee 500.00 100-Public Works Director Review - per hour 90.00 Additional Escrow May Be Required on a Project by Project Basis 100-City Planner Review - per hour 65.00 Additional Escrow May Be Required on a Project by Project Basis 2020 ADOPTED FEE SCHEDULE FEE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER FEE SCHEDULE Water rates - residential (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Tier 1: 0 gallons to 4,999 gallons 2.04 Tier 2: 5,000 gallons to 8,999 gallons 2.45 Tier 3: 9,000 gallons to 19,999 gallons 3.06 Tier 4: 20,000 gallons and over 4.08 Water rates - non residential (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Tier 1: 1,000 gallons +2.45 Water base fees - payable by each user for each month Residential 16.00 Non residential - Under 1" Meter 16.00 Non residential - 1" to 3" Meter 24.00 Non residential - Over 3" Meter 32.00 Sewer rates - residential (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Existing Customers - Based on Winter Water Usage (November-March)2.81 New Customers - Based on 5,417 gallons per month 2.81 Sewer rates - non residential (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Tier 1: 1,000 gallons +2.81 Sewer base fees - payable by each user for each month Residential 28.41 Non residential 28.41 Late/Past Due Payments Late Payment Penalty 10% of unpaid bill Water Disconnect 65.00 Water Reconnect 65.00 Bulk Water Sales Set Up/Administrative Fee 65.00 Water Meter Rental Deposit 1,000.00 Tier 1: 1,000 gallons +2.45 Trunk Line Availability Charge (TLAC) Water Trunk Line Availability Charge (TLAC) - per acre (southeast district)6,270 (was 6,246) Water Trunk Line Availability Charge (TLAC) - per acre (northeast district)16,300 (new) Sewer Trunk Line Availability Charge (TLAC) - per acre (all districts)6,980 (was 4,043) Connection Fees - City of Corcoran Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Single Family 1,195.00 Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Multi-Family 955.00 Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Non-Residential 1,195.00 Sewer Connection Fee (per unit) - Single Family 1,195.00 Sewer Connection Fee (per unit) - Multi-Family 955.00 Sewer Connection Fee (per unit) - Non-Residential 1,195.00 Connection Fees - City of Maple Grove (Per Maple Grove Fee Schedule) Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Residential/individual laundry facilities 2,591.00 Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Residential/ no individual laundry facilities 2,073.00 Water Connection Fee (per acre) - Commercial/Industrial/Mixed 10,364.00 Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Parks 1,296.00 Water Connection Fee (per acre) - All other Churches which do not house weekday school, preschool, and/or daycare activities 9,400.00 Connection Fees - Metropolitan Council Sewer Access Charge (SAC)2,485.00 Meter Fees Meter - standard Cost plus 10% Meter - larger than standard Cost plus 10% Meter Inspection 65.00 Meter - Temporary Installation 65.00 City of Corcoran 2020 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 12. June 25, 2020 • Employee Recognition – Jessica Beise, 5 Years • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • Karineimi Addition PP (city file 20-016) (incomplete) • Tavera (Wessel) PUD, PP and RZ (city file 20-017) • Spanier CUP/Variance (city file 20-019) (incomplete) • Corridor Planning Grant Application • Proceed with Purchase Agreement – Test Well Site • Resignation – Councilmember Dejewski; Declaration of a Vacancy • Easement Acquisition – Southeast Watermain Project July 9, 2020 • Employee Recognition – Pat Meister, 30 Years • Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project Recap • Fire Subcommittee Report Work Plan • City Hall remodel bid review • Police Body Camera Policy Public Hearing & Adoption • Bring Your Own Device Policy • Draft 2021 Budget July 23, 2020 • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • Eagle Brook Church • Nelson Trucking • Bellwether 5th addition August 13, 2020 Work Session • Public Works Department Update August 13, 2020 • Employee Recognition – Pete Ekenberg, 5 Years • Liquor License Fee Review (See April 23 meeting info) • Gravel Road Paving Recommendations August 27, 2020 • Active Corcoran Planning Applications