The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2020-04-23 Council Agenda PacketCorcoran City Council Agenda April 23, 2020 - 7:00pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Commission Representatives – Discontinued until further notice 5.Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6. Presentations/Recognitions a.Three Rivers Park District – Diamond Lake Regional Trail Corridor Update* 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of April 13, 2020 Council Meeting* b.Financial Claims* c.Resolution 2020-34 Temporary Liquor License – Hamel Rodeo* 8.Planning Business a.Concept Plan for a Modification of Approvals for “Sawgrass” – 20400 County Road 10* b.Sketch Plan for Eagle Brook Church* 9.Unfinished Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Northwest Metro Regional Surface Water Supply Study Update* b.City Hall Closure Extension* 10.New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Ordinance Amendment – Mandatory Utility Connection* b.Letters of Support – CSAH 19/CR 117 Spot Mobility & Safety Project* c.Cropland Rental – 8200 County Road 116* d.Liquor License Renewal* 11.Staff Reports a.Active Corcoran Planning Applications* b.Pandemic Response Update 12. 2020 City Council Schedule* 13. Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.ci.corcoran.mn.us. Telephone Meeting Call-in Instructions Call: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 942 9637 5054 Press *9 to Comment during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.ci.corcoran.mn.us Due to the COVID-19 health pandemic, the City Council’s regular meeting place is not available and is not open to the public. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D.021 the one or more members of the City Council may participate by telephone or other electronic means. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6a. Council Meeting: April 23, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Three Rivers Park District – Diamond Lake Regional Trail Update Action Required: Direction Summary: Three Rivers Park District is creating a master plan for the future development of the Diamond Lake Regional Trail (DLRT) through the western portion of Hennepin County, including Corcoran. The vision for DLRT is for a 10-foot-wide paved, multi-use trail that will connect areas of high natural resource value, local parks and trails, and other existing and future regional trails in the Three Rivers network. A major goal is to create a scenic, park-like experience for trail users, rather than being primarily adjacent to roads. On December 19, 2019, Three Rivers staff introduced this master plan project to the City Council. Subsequently, Three Rivers staff have been evaluating potential trail routes through the corridor, including the eastern area of Corcoran. On February 20, 2020 the Corcoran Parks & Trails Commission conducted a workshop session with Three Rivers staff and provided input on the proposed trail route options through the city. Three Rivers staff have worked closely with City staff in reviewing and refining the preferred trail route options, resulting in the attached is a map which illustrates the trail route alternatives. Three Rivers is seeking City Council review and support, but not a formal resolution at this time, for these trail route alternatives as the next step in their proces s prior to initiating public engagement. Simultaneously, Three Rivers is seeking similar review and support from the other six communities along the trail route for their respective trail segments. Once all seven cities have reviewed and given their support for the trail route alternatives, Three Rivers will commence their public engagement for the master plan project later this summer (subject to current COVID-19 health guidelines). At the conclusion of the public engagement period, Three Rivers will bring the results of public comments and a preferred route recommendation back to the Parks Commissi on and City Council for review. Three Rivers staff will be available to answer questions during the City Council meeting. Financial/Budget: The Diamond Lake Regional Trail would be funded through Three Rivers Park District. Council Action: Provide feedback to Three Rivers Park District staff on draft alignment options. Attachments: 1.Draft trail alignment options STIEG WOODS ROCKFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT PARK MEDINA LAKE PRESERVE FIELDS OF MEDINA CORCORAN LIONS CLUB PARK CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK MEDINA GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB VILLAS RESERVE OF MEDINADUFFNEY DRIVERIDGECOURTL I L I U M TRAIL ASTER ROAD D STREET81 S T P L A C E N O R T H B R I DLEPATHVALLEYVIEWROADL ARKSPURLANELU PINE L A N E CARRIAGEWAY63RD AVENUE NORTH PRAIRIEVIEWTRAILA STREETG STREET BRIDGEWATER ROADTILTON TRAIL SOUTHABILENE LANE COMMERCE STREETHILLSIDE DRIVE HACKAMORE ROADTRAIL LANEWILD M E ADOWSDRIVE HUNTERS RIDGE B STREET BUCKSKINTRAILHORSESHOE TRAIL CAVANAUGH DRIVE ANNABEL L E L ANE CHIPPEWA ROAD STEEPLECHASELANEHIGH W A Y 5 5MOHAWK DRIVEFOXB E R R Y FARMS RO A D 75TH AVENUE NORTH COUNTY ROAD 116MEDI NA L A KE D R I V E SCHUTTEFARM ROAD HIDDEN PONDS DRIVE FLETCHER LANEO A K D A L E D R I V E FIRLANENORTHDUFFNEY CIRCLE GLEASON PARKWAY FESCUE DRIVEC O U N T Y R O A D 1 0 OLDE STURBRIDGE DRIVEHEATHERDRIVECHERRY LANEJU BERT TRAIL LA R K SPURCOURTROBERT LANEAUGER AVENUE SHOREWOODTRAILFOXTAIL DRIV E SETTLERSROAD 72ND AVENUENORTH SUN R I S E COURT OAK RIDGE ROAD COUNTY ROAD 50 BLUEBELLTRAILNORTH93RD AVENUE NORTH MEISTER CIRCLEP A RK T R A I L R O A D WO O DLAND H IL L C O U R T PADDOCK LA N E C S TREETGAL L OWAYCIR C L EHIGHLANDRIDGEROADHUNTER ROADFOXBERRYD R I V E F STREET BL UEBEL L TRAIL S O UTHJ A C K IE LA N E TRILLIUMDRIVE S OUTH COUNTRY CIRCLE EAST E STREET FAIRWAYDRIVETRILLIUMDRIVEN ORTH GLEASON ROADCAIN ROADSCHUTTELANE C A L A MUSCIRCLESHAWNEE WOODS ROADEBERT ROAD109TH AVENUE NORTH OLDE STURBRIDGE ROAD HUNTER LANECOUNTRYROAD 66THAVENUENORTH P R I M R O S E L A NE MEADOWVIEWLANEELMSTREETLARKIN ROAD CO UNTY RO A D 3 0 KATRINKA ROAD ARROWHEADDRIVEBER G A M O T D RIVEPATRICKPLACE 70TH AVENUENORTHEAGLERIDGEROAD DARRELL LANE BUTTERWORTHL A NE OSWALDFARMROADCAIN PLACE SNYDER ROADDASSEL LANE OL DSETTL ERSRO A D STIE G R O A D GOT H R O A D SHANNON LANEVALLEYDRIVESCHUTTEROAD RUSH MEA D O W L A N E 113TH AVENUE NORTH MEISTER ROAD CORCORAN TRAIL WESTCORCORAN TRAIL EASTM YSTIQ U ED R IV E MAPLE HILL ROADSCHUTTE PL AC E S U N N Y H I L L L ANE BRANDYWINE ROADBLUE BONNET DRIVEPRAIRIECREEKRO A D CORCORAN ROGERS MEDINA 0 400 800200 US Feet Potential Diamond Lake Regional Trail Alignment Existing Off-Street Trail Proposed Off-Street Trail Existing On-Street Trail Proposed On-Street Trail Developments Scientific and Natural Area Boundaries TRPD Parks Parks Public Land City Limits Existing Regional Trail Planned Regional Trail Regional Trail Search Corridor CITY OF CORCORAN DIAMOND LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN APRIL 2020 POTENTIAL UNDERPASS CORCORAN CITY HALL WEAVER L A K E R E GI O N A L T R AI L RUS H C R E E K R E G I O N A L T R A I L CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes April 13, 2020 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on April 13, 2020, at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were Mayor Thomas at City Hall and present via telephonic or other electronic means were Councilor Anderson, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Dejewski, and Councilor Schultz. Also present were City Administrator Martens, and Administrative Services Director Beise. Public Works Director Mattson and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk were present via telephonic or other electronic means. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor Thomas called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Martens stated the April 13 Council Meeting is the first Council meeting in which public comment is presently available through telephonic or other electronic means due to the COVID-19 pandemic. City Administrator Martens explained the process for public comment and the various points throughout the Council meeting public comment would be opened. City Administrator Martens requested item 10d. Corcoran Financial Processes Review be removed. MOTION: made by Anderson, seconded by Schultz to approve the agenda as modified. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 4.Commission Representatives – Discontinued Until Further Notice 5.Open Forum (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor Thomas invited residents to communicate telephonically at Open Forum. City Administrator Martens noted the public comment instructions (press *9 to be recognized to speak) to any persons wishing to comment. No persons participated in the public comment portion of the meeting. No persons were heard. 6.Presentations/Recognitions No presentations or recognitions were heard. 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of March 20, 2020 Special Council Meeting b.Draft Minutes of March 26, 2020 Council Meeting c.Financial Claims d.Southeast Corcoran 2020 Trunk Watermain Improvements – Accept Plans and Authorize Bids e.2020 Road Materials Bid Awards – Asphalt Maintenance, Gravel, Seal Coat/Fog Seal, Dust Control, and Gravel Hauling Services f.Equipment Purchase – Bobcat Loaders g.Resignation – Emma Remillard h.Charter Commission Appointment Council asked that items 7c. and 7e. be considered separately. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Schultz to approve consent agenda items 7a., 7b., 7d., 7f., 7g., and 7h. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) Council requested COVID-19 expense clarification within item 7c. Financial Claims. City Administrator Martens reported COVID-19 related expenses are currently $12,827.76, and include Agenda Item 7a. 2 costs for PPE, park closing signs, and technology-related services and equipment. City Administrator Martens noted technology is the largest portion of COVID-19 expenses to date. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Anderson to approve consent agenda item 7c. Financial Claims. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) Regarding item 7e., Council questioned bids at price per unit and if Council would be authorizing a set quantity for road materials. Public Works Director Mattson indicated Council is authorizing unit price, however unit price item correlates to the 2020 budget item. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Dejewski approving consent agenda item 7e. 2020 Road Materials Bid Awards. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 8. Planning Business No planning business was heard. 9. Unfinished Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor Thomas invited the public to comment telephonically noting the public comment instructions. (press *9 to be recognized to speak). No persons participated in the public comment portion of the meeting. No persons were heard. a. Strategic Planning Recap; Core Strategies, Short-Term Goals, and 2020 Action Steps City Administrator Martens recapped the City’s Strategic Planning Work Session, an overview of process and where the City is at with draft action steps from the February 10 strategic planning work session. City Administrator Martens presented the 2020 core strategies of enhancing Corcoran’s sense of place and identity, maintaining fiscal stability and affordability, providing diverse community amenities and recreational opportunities, maintain excellence in safety and security in community, ensure high quality growth that meets the needs of a balanced and vibrant commu nity, and providing high quality, innovative municipal services. Council discussed impacts of current pandemic of COVID-19 as it relates to the to the current needs of staff, budget , and economy. Council reviewed order of importance of current short-term goals and relevancy of action steps of each core strategy in the current pandemic situation. City Administrator Martens noted the next steps would be to refine the action steps based on the feedback received from Council and bring back the core strategies, short-term goals, and action steps for final approval. b. 2020 Financial Management Plan City Administrator Martens presented a recap from the February 13 Council Work Session reiterating the Council’s direction to maintain a steady tax base. Council commented briefly on enhanced park improvements, northeast trunk connection fee, paving of gravel roads, and clarification of language. MOTION: made by Anderson, seconded by Schultz to accept the 2020 Financial Management Plan as presented. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 10. New Business (Public Comment Opportunity) City Administrator Martens invited the public to comment telephonically noting the public comment instructions (press *9 to be recognized to speak). No persons participated in the public comment portion of the meeting. No persons were heard. a. Appaloosa Woods Neighborhood Meeting Recap City Administrator Martens updated Council on proposed Maple Grove 2021 project in Appaloosa Woods Neighborhood and options available to the City of Corcoran regarding paving options, water and sewer options, and assessment options within project. City Administrator Martens noted Maple Grove will discontinue grading gravel roads following project completion. City Administrator Martens 3 reviewed a staff recommendation of a feasibility study and letter of benefit for a potential paving project in Appaloosa Woods neighborhood. Council and staff discussed length of the road on requested road, survey comments by residents, the possibility and type of paved road, connection fees, the high cost of fees, and possible annexation by Maple Grove of this portion of the city. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Dejewski to approve staff to complete a feasibility study and obtain a letter of benefit for a paving project in Appaloosa Woods neighborhood. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) b. 2020 Dust Control Program City Administrator Martens presented the 2020 Dust Control Program project costs and indicated the project cost increased substantially by 18 percent because of increases to material costs. City Administrator Martens noted a small savings on Stieg Road, as a portion of Stieg Road is now paved. City Administrator Martens noted staff recommends keeping the 2020 dust control assessment rates to property owners consistent with the 2019 dust control assessment rates. Council and staff discussed the product price increase, the possibility of reduced application of dust control for less populated roads to reduce use of product, and impacts of road stability with reduced application, and impacts to budget. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Schultz approve Resolution 2020-28 Calling for a Public Hearing on the Potential Assessment of Costs of Dust Control Treatments to be Applied to City Streets in 2020. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) MOTION: made by Schulz to approve staff to review dust control and stay within the 2020 budget. (Motion failed; lack of second) Council discussed assessing based on property unit versus by property frontage, and how that changes value of assessment. c. Employee Mental Wellness Program Director of Public Safety Gottschalk presented mental health issues proposal, reviewed the impact of employee mental health in the workplace, and limited mental health support. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk addressed the City’s Employee Assistance Program, and why the program is ineffective for employees. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the need to address the gap in short-term care for employees with issues that precipitate the need for mental health support that are singular, professional or life events that don’t require long-term care. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk presented a current issue for short-term mental health support through health insurance, requires an employee be diagnosed with a mental health diagnosis. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted an officer or staff member may be working through a critical issue that does not have a long-term impact, but are trying to resolve an issue with strategies for a short-term issue; in this case to utilize health insurance, the officer or staff member would need to receive a clinical diagnosis to receive treatment under health insurance. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk also noted a work-related mental health incident that does not qualify under health insurance may impact worker’s compensation. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk explained along with officer annual mental health check-ins, the program would also include short-term individual counseling sessions for all staff and utilizes a single service provider for solution-oriented therapy. Council and staff discussed other outside resources that are available for mental health related stresses, whether all staff members should be included, and pertains to a specific incident -related event. 4 MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Anderson to direct staff to enter into the Wellness Program Services Agreement with Marie Ridgeway to provide annual mandatory police officer mental health check-ins and optional short-term mental health services for all City staff. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) d. Corcoran Financial Processes Review; Rescheduled to a future Council meeting. 11. Staff Reports a. Pandemic Response Update Director of Public Safety Gottschalk presented the current state of COVID-19 and impacts to Corcoran residents, noting the peak for deaths in Minnesota is now projected for mid-July. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the importance of managing res ources, coordinating staff work schedules and workplaces, and accomplishing service needs. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk briefed Council on current status of an increase in serious calls such as robberies and burglaries, while traffic related stops have decreased in frequency. City Administrator Martens reviewed tax impacts and possible postponement of May 15 property tax deadline, adjusting work schedules, scheduling remote meetings, cancellation of spring baseball, and cancellation of future events with the Lions and NW Jaycees. Council noted the staff’s work throughout this difficult period. Council asked if PPE supply for officers is sufficient. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk indicated the City of Corcoran is sufficiently-positioned with PPE inventory for officers and staff. 12. 2020 Council Schedule City Administrator Martens noted upcoming agenda items for the Council meeting on April 23, 2020. 13. Adjournment MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Anderson to adjourn. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: Thomas, Anderson, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:27 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk Agenda Item 7b. Council Meeting Date: 4/23/2020 FINANCIAL CLAIMS Prepared By: jrotz CHECK RANGE FUND #500 ESCROW CLAIMSAgendaItem: 7b. Paid toAmountProject name 500-20476$361.25LANDFORM - Kissner PP and FP 20-001 500-20436$1,844.25LANDFORM - Pulte Bellwether 4th FP and FPUD 20-002 500-20485$303.25LANDFORM - Tessmer -Topo Exemption 20-007 500-20323$34.75LANDFORM - Sawgrass Extension 20-008 500-20473$202.75LANDFORM - Corcoran Self Storage PUD Amendment 20-009 500-20489$915.00LANDFORM - Paulsen Farm OSP PP 20-011 500-20488$257.00LANDFORM - Sawgrass PUD Concept 20-012 500-20487$289.00LANDFORM - Eaglebrook Church #20-013 500-20332$228.00WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - LENNAR WESSEL PROPERTY 500-20480$67.50WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Nelson - Wetland Review (Nelson International Property) 500-20481$216.00WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Landspec Fund 2Wetland Review (6210 Pioneer Trail) 500-20484$769.50WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Kariniemi WCA 500-20486$1,213.50WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - 7540 Rolling Hills Road WCA 500-20335$8,393.92WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - LENNAR - ENGINEERING 500-20376$101.20WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - PARK PLACE STORAGE 500-20438$1,272.83WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Bass Lake Crossing M/IHome 17-012 Engineering 500-20423$508.30WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Bass Lake Estates Sketch PUD 17-015 500-20423$1,488.00WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Cold Storage Crossings 500-20474$55.20WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - ComLink Midwest CUP 19-011 500-20459$67.50WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Refuge ofRush Creek FP 18-028 500-20436$14,151.71WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 500-20332$5,568.50WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Wessel Property Feasibility Study 500-20487$3,229.00WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Eagle Brook Church #20-013 500-20490$3,347.00WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Cook Lake - Schommer 500-20488$567.00WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Sawgrass PUD Concept 20-012 500-20491$202.50WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - Paulsen Farms OSP Total 45,654.41 Total Fund #500 = 45,654.41 See attached Payments Detail) ALL OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMSAgendaItem:7b.$ 91,062.50$ 136,716.91Total Checks See attached Check Detail Register) Total of Auto Deductions 99,292.01 TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL$ 236,008.92 Auto Deductions / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursements DatePaid toAmount 4/10/2020USPS - Hamel, MN$ 500.00Postage forwater/sewer billing 4/10/2020Paypal - MNFOP$ 175.00PD memberships 4/10/2020Responder Gear Inc. - Minneapolis, MN$ 479.98COVID-19 Supplies 4/10/2020Payroll Taxes$ 255.16payroll taxes 4/10/2020ADP Wage Garnishment$ 269.83Garnishment 4/10/2020ADP Wage Garnishment$ 542.77Garnishment 4/10/2020Net Payroll PP08$ 809.52Net payroll PP08 4/10/2020Payroll Taxes$ 16,575.83payroll taxes 4/10/2020Net Payroll PP08$ 44,969.57Net payroll PP08 4/13/2020REVTRAK SV9T$ 7,138.48Baseball refunds 4/13/2020PERA$ 13,571.05Pension plan 4/14/2020Optum - HS A$ 3,368.73Health savings account 4/14/2020REVTRAK SV9T$ 6,370.00Baseball refunds 4/15/2020State ofMN - MSRS$ 2,007.82State of MN healthcare savings plan 4/15/2020State of MN - Roth$ 2,258.27Deferred compensation payment toState ofMN Total 99,292.01 H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\CouncilClaims\\2020ClaimsWorkbook.xls 10100FarmersStateBankUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-42100-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-45200-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-41941-219Covid-19CoronavirusR100-45200-36199RecreationProgrammingE100-42100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-41941-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41941-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41410-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41400-210OperatingSuppliesGENERAL)E100-43100-212MotorFuelsE100-42100-212MotorFuelsE100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-42100-219 Covid-19CoronavirusE 100-42100-219 Covid-19CoronavirusE 100-42100-219 Covid-19CoronavirusE 100-42100-219 Covid-19CoronavirusE 100-42100-219 Covid-19CoronavirusE 100-42100-219 Covid-19CoronavirusE 100-42100-219 Covid-19CoronavirusE 100-42100-219 Covid-19CoronavirusTotal CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTONTotal AMAZON CAPITALSERVICESTotal BEAUDRY OILCOMPANY Total ASPENEQUIPMENTTotal BOYERTRUCKSTotal BEISE, JESSICATotal BREVIG, RYANTotal BSNSPORTSAMAZONCAPITALSERVICESCINTAS - 470CENTERPOINTENERGYHOUSTONBSNSPORTSBREVIG, RYANBOYERTRUCKSBEISE, JESSICABEAUDRY OILCOMPANYASPENEQUIPMENT$209.98$501.53$397.92$610.46$512.82($99.99)$25.88$72.28$33.29$65.16$57.79$70.00$16.11$36.00$30.53$28.38$63.94$94.80$59.99$33.72$82.70$4.1013KN-GVQV-R4048131758041320041320908802617REFUND768 84R04162004162004162004162015851611585161102165341YHY-P33D-61MHJ-DNP7-C1KV6-QQV9-11H67-WPVV-C1H3W-PYPM-1FJK-6DPC-416GX-WL4L-1SUPPLIESTOWELSNATURAL GAS - 5754460-3NATURAL GAS - 5754177-3SUPPLIEST-BALL COACH PITCH BASEBALL REFUNDPARTSZOOM MEETING SUBSCRIPTIONCERTIFIED LETTERELECTION SUPPLIESMILEAGEGASOLINESEAL KIT, RAM ACOVID-19 SUPPLIESSUPPLIESCOVID-19 SUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESCOVID-19 SUPPLIES04/16/20 3:10 PM CITYOFCORCORAN1,530.36$426.30$501.53$63.94$98.45$57.79$70.00$ 86.74 Page 1 Check Detail Register© April 2020 UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-42100-223BuildingRepairSuppliesE416-45200-580OtherEquipmentE427-43100-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsE100-41920-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41910-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)G500-20487EaglebrookChurch #20-013G500-20488SawgrassPUDConcept20-012G500-20489PaulsenFarmOSPPP20-011G500-20473CorcoranSelfStorage19-010G500-20323SawgrassExtension20-008G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20476KissnerWetlandWaiver19-015R100-45200-36199RecreationProgrammingE100-41900-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41900-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-42100-321TelephoneE100-41941-321TelephoneE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-417 UniformsE100-41941-210 OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)Total HENNCOTAXPAYER SERVICES Total FASTENALCOMPANYTotal COMCAST-INTERNETTotal LANOEQUIPMENTTotal CINTAS - 470Total KOCH, PAULTotal LANDFORMCOMCAST-INTERNETMNUNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCELANOEQUIPMENTLANDFORMKOCH, PAULHENNCOTAXPAYERSERVICESFASTENALCOMPANY$35,598.59$1,844.25$1,361.75$4,958.00$116.94$100.00$177.50$289.00$257.00$915.00$668.25$202.75$303.25$583.50$618.25$402.50$361.25$8 44.31$24.10$34.75$75.00$17.86$17.50$72.43$72.42$87.40$85.14404813189803-74236030324303243032430324303243032430324303243032430324303243032430324303243032430324REFUNDMNTC4157961041020041020404813191240 481319044048131899FLOOR MATS - POLICE72" FORESTRYDRUMMULCHERCityMeetings66thAvenueCorridorImprovementsCodeEnforcementCity MeetingsEaglebrookChurch #20-013SawgrassPUDConcept20-012PaulsenFarmOSPPP20-011VollrathAgPreserve20-010CorcoranSelfStoragePUDAmendment20-009SawgrassExtension 20-008Tessmer -TopoExemption20-007AnnualCodification20-005ParkDedicationFeeUpdate20-0042020ZoningMapUpdates20-003PulteBellwether4thFPandFPUD20-002KissnerPPandFP20-001T-BALL & COACHPITCHBASEBALLREFUNDPROPERTYTAXPROPERTYTAXSUPPLIESPDINTERNETCITYHALLINTERNETPUBLICWORKSUNIFORMSCITYHALL04/16/203:10 PM CITYOFCORCORAN13,077.00$35,598.59$385.86$844.31$144.85$35.36$ 75.00 Page 2 Check Detail Register© April 2020 UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-43100-140UnemploymentComp (GENERALE427-43100-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsE425-43100-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsE425-49450-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsG500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20459RefugeofRushCreekFP18-028G500-20474ComLinkMidwestCUP19-011G500-20423BassLakeEstSkchPUD17-015G500-20423BassLakeEstSkchPUD17-015G500-20438BassLkCRM/IHomeEngineeringG500-20376ParkPlaceStorageE419-43100-303EngineeringFeesG500-20335LennarEngPlanReview/ModificE601-49400-303EngineeringFeesE602-49450-303EngineeringFeesG500-204867540RollingHillsRoadWCAG500-20484KariniemiWCAG500-20481LandspecFund2WetlandReviewG500-20480NelsonWetlandReviewG500-20332LennarWesselFeasibilityE100-43170-299WatershedLGUE100-43170-299WatershedLGUE100-41941-400Repairs & MaintCont (GENERAL)R100-45200-36199RecreationProgrammingR100-45200-36199RecreationProgrammingE100-41100-208TrainingandInstructionE100-41900-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-45200-140 UnemploymentComp (GENERALTotal MNUNEMPLOYMENTINSURANCETotal NORTHLANDSECURITIESINC Total SCHERWEIT, KRISTITotal REINKING, MEGANTotal PHILIPKERNNORTHLANDSECURITIESINCWENCKASSOCIATES, INC.TEGRETESCHERWEIT, KRISTIREINKING, MEGANPHILIP KERNTotal TEGRETE$12,075.80$14,151.71$4,948.71$1,488.00$1,272.83$1,005.00$8,393.92$8,296.501,213.50$2,300.00$882.00$186.50$105.00$245.90$508.30$101.20$423.50$769.50$216.00$228.00$540.00$380.00$17.08$67.50$55.20$67.50$67.50$70.00$70.0020201QUI041420041420041420041420041420041420041420041 42004142004142004142004142004142004142004142004142004142004142004142004142004142004142089474REFUNDREFUNDTEAMBUILDI610920201QUI20201QUIPAYMENTSCSAH116andGleasonParkwayTurnLanesPulte Encore - TurnLanesCSAH101andEncorePulte Encore - NETrunkSewerPulte Encore - PUDSkch17-029RefugeofRushCreekFP18-028ComLinkMidwestCUP19-011BassLakeEstatesSketchPUD17-015BassLakeCrossingM/IHome17-012 EngineeringPARKPLACESTORAGE66thStreetDesignand ConstructionHACKAMOREROADIMPROVEMENTS2294-0028LENNAR - ENGINEERINGWater -EngineeringSanitary Sewer - Engineering7540RollingHillsRoadWCAKariniemiWCALandspecFund2WetlandReview (6210PioneerTrail)Nelson - WetlandReview (NelsonInternationalProperty)E.MAYERSWCAVIOLATIONWCARESIDENTITEMSMONTHLYCITYHALLCLEANINGT-BALL & COACHPITCHBASEBALLREFUNDT-BALL & COACHPITCHBASEBALLREFUNDCITYOFCORCORANTEAMBUILDINGANDGOAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN2020 1Q UI PAYMENTS04/16/20 3:10PMCITYOFCORCORAN4,965.79$2,300.00$882.00$380.00$70.00$70. 00 SETTING Page 3 Check Detail Register© April 2020 Check FundSummaryUnpaidUnpaid 10100FarmersStateBank100GENERALFUND602SEWER601WATER500ESCROWHOLDINGFUND427GLEASON/66THPARKWAYEXTENSION425PULTEENCORE/BELLWETHERPROJEC419HACKAMOREUPGRADE (LENNAR)416CAPITAL-EQUIPMENTCERTSE100-43170-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41941-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-43100-381Street/SignalLightsE100-43100-381Street/SignalLightsG500-20491PaulsenFarmsOSPG500-20488SawgrassPUDConcept20-012G500-20490CookLake - SchommerG500-20487EaglebrookChurch #20-013G500-20332LennarWesselFeasibilityE425-43100-530ImprovementsOtherThanBldgsE100-43170-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-43170-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-43170-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-43170-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E601-49400-303 EngineeringFeesTotal WENCKASSOCIATES, INC. Total ZEP SALES & SERVICETotal XCEL ENERGYXCEL ENERGYZEP SALES & SERVICE$25,451.96$13,436.50$45,654.41$13,624.05$35,598.59$1,005.00$1,522.90$423.50$5,140.00$3,347.00$3,229.00$5,568.50$1,366.70$1,120.00$1,040.00$270.00$134.49$202.50$567.00$972.00$200.00$31 8.00$24.00$74.990414209005071035679440679041420041420041420041420041420041420041420041420041420041420041420041420General Eng ServicesSUPPLIESSTREET LIGHTING CR19/CR 30STREET LIGHTING 9525 CAIN ROADPaulsen Farms OSPSawgrass PUD Concept 20-012Cook Lake - SchommerEagle Brook Church #20-013Wessel Property Feasibility StudyCSAH101 and Stieg Road Turn LanesStieg Road Designand ConstructionDOWNTOWN RETROFIT PERMITTING AND DESIGNMS4 STORMWATERCITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERINGMNDOT STATE AID2020 SEC Corcoran Trunk Watermain04/16/203:10PMCITYOFCORCORAN74,819.56$158.49$74.99 10100 Farmers State Bank$136,716. 91 136,716. 91 Page 4 Check Detail Register© April 2020 Check CityofCorcoran ConsultantSummary 4/23/2020 NameInvoice DateAmount Due Carson, Clelland & Schreder Landform04/10/20 13,077.00 Metro West Inspection Rolf Erickson Enterprises Wenck Associates04/14/20 74,819.56 Total$ 87,896.56 H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\Council Claims\\2020ClaimsWorkbook.xls City of Corcoran April 23, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2020-34 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran that the following Liquor License is granted effective for the dates as indicated, to the following Licensee, provided appropriate application and insurance documents. LICENSEE LICENSE LICENSE EFFECTIVE DATE Hamel Rodeo, Inc.* 1 Day to 4 Day Temporary On-Sale Liquor License July 9, 2020 – July 12, 2020 *Restricted use (purchasing and consuming) in fenced off "Beer Gardens" area only at Lions VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Anderson, Tom Anderson, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of April 2020. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director 7c. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 8a. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 14, 2020 for the April 23, 2020 City Council Meeting RE: Concept Plan for a modification of the approvals for “Sawgrass” on the 103-acre parcel at 20400 County Road 10 (PID 23-119-23-42-0003) (City file no. 20-012) REVIEW DEADLINE: May 19, 2020 1.Description of Request M/I Homes is requesting Council feedback on their concept plan for modifications they are proposing to the approved preliminary plans for Sawgrass. If the Council supports the changes, the applicant will submit an application for approval of a final plat, final PUD development plan and PUD amendment. 2.Background The City reviewed a concept plan for the Sawgrass development in the summer of 2014. The City completed an EAW (environmental assessment worksheet) and adopted a determination of No Need for EIS on November 13, 2014. The City granted preliminary approvals for 246 homes on 103-acres on December 11, 2014 and these approvals were valid for two years. One-year extensions were approved by the Council on February 23, 2017, January 25, 2018 and February 28, 2019 with a current expiration date of February 28, 2020. On February 27, 2020, the City Council approved an extension of the preliminary approvals until August 27, 2020. 3. Analysis: The application notes the while the plat will include the entire site, development area will be reduced from 103 acres to 90 acres, because the landowner will retain 7.5-acres of land on the west side of the site and St. Thomas the Apostle Church will acquire 5-acres on the east. Policy Issues State Statutes and the City Code require submittal of a final plat within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless the Council grants an extension. The reasoning for this timeline is that City standards change and new developments should be required to comply with the current design standards. M/I Sawgrass Concept Plan (city file no. 20-012) 2 April 23, 2020 The City’s discretion in approving a final plat and final PUD plan is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance and the conditions of preliminary plat and preliminary PUD approval. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat and final PUD plan. Therefore, by extending the preliminary approvals, the Council does limit their discretion in approving the final plat/final PUD plan. Therefore, the purpose of this concept plan review is to highlight the proposed PUD modifications and provide feedback about the plans are generally consistent with the approved preliminary plans. • If the Council finds that they are, the next step would be for the applicant to apply for approval of a final plat, final PUD development plan and PUD amendment. • If the Council finds that the changes are significant, then the applicant would be required to follow a two-step process: 1) a new application for preliminary plat and preliminary PUD development plan and 2) an application for final plat and final PUD development plan. PUD Amendments The original Sawgrass PUD approvals included flexibility from some standards in exchange for a development with amenities or improvements that would not otherwise have been possible. Specifically: The developer received PUD flexibility for: • Reduced lot sizes (area and width) • Reduced setbacks • Signage (sign area and number) • Flexibility from the architectural design standards, regarding garages • Alternative wetland buffers • Trails located within the buffer • Shoreland Overlay District flexibility related to lot coverage, lot width, setbacks and building height. In return for this flexibility, the developer provided: • HOA-maintained permanent open space (38% of the site) • HOA-maintained landscaping in the cul de sac islands and entry monument • A restored urban forest with more than 1,620 new trees • Decorative street lighting • Sidewalks all public streets • Dedication of a trail easement on the west side of the property without park dedication credit • Paving of the entry trail at no cost • Preservation/restoration/enhancement of wetlands • Financing of trunk infrastructure improvements, including a lift station in the project and improvements to County Road 10 • Life-cycle housing opportunities with single family detached homes and some association maintained housing planned. M/I Sawgrass Concept Plan (city file no. 20-012) 3 April 23, 2020 The applicant is now working with M/I homes to develop the property. We don’t have enough detail yet to ensure compliance with all standards, but we know that there are several changes that are beyond the typical minor changes that occur between preliminary and final approval These changes will require a PUD amendment to be processed with the final plans if the Council finds that the general intent of the PUD is still being met: 1. The new plan eliminates the 75-foot wide lots and replaces them with 55- and 65-foot wide lots. In exchange for this change, the applicant is proposing to increase the site yard setback from the approved 5-foot setback to 7.5 feet. a. They would increase the number of lots from 246 to 261 homes. This increases the gross density from 2.39 units per acre (upa) to 2.9 upa. b. We expect that net density will remain in the 3-5 unit per net acre range required by the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Change foundation types, which will impact the grading plan. The proposal would include a mix of slab, full, lookout, walk out foundations. 3. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum garage size and the applicant is requesting PUD flexibility from these standards. This is a new request that was not part of the original approvals. 4. The original approvals received PUD flexibility from the maximum garage area on the front elevation. The applicant is requesting an additional increase to allow garage face to increase to 62% of the front elevation of the single family homes. 5. Townhomes were a highly desired component of the original development proposal for the Council at the time. The new concept increases the number of townhomes from 20 to 75 homes. Proposed PUD Uses The new plan includes a variety of single family homes, twin homes and townhomes. The plans show: 164 single family homes 22 twin homes 75 townhomes 261 total homes While the total number of units has changed, the mix of units is consistent with the PUD approvals. Design Standards The City Code establishes the following design requirements for single family homes and twin homes and different design requirements for townhomes and apartments: M/I Sawgrass Concept Plan (city file no. 20-012) 4 April 23, 2020 Single Family and Twin homes Townhomes and Apartments A. Front Elevation: 1. Definition: i. For the purpose of this Section, front elevation shall be the elevation facing the front lot line on the street of the mailing address for the property when the property has more than one front lot line. 2. Materials used: i. The front elevation shall have material consisting of brick, stone, stucco, fiber cement board, redwood, cedar or other similar materials. A minimum of two different materials is required, except that brick may be used on the entire elevation ii. Vinyl siding is permitted when combined with the materials listed in Subd. 8.A.2.i of this Section. A minimum of 3 different variations in color, style and/or material is required. For example, if vinyl siding is used, the home shall have combination of each lap, shake or board and batten plus brick or stone. The percentage of each used material/style of materials used shall be shown on the plans. iii. Except for brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone, the front elevation shall have no more than 75% of one type of exterior finish. The percentage of materials used shall be shown on the plans. 3. Architectural Elements: i. The front elevation façade shall consist of doors, windows and variations of the wall face with the use of pilasters or columns, wainscots, canopies or other architectural elements. 4. Design: i. Front elevations shall be varied with a minimum of five different styles provided in the development. ii. Homes in proximity to each other shall not look alike in terms of the combination of color of siding, accent and roofing materials. The home under consideration will be compared to the two homes on each side and to the three homes directly facing it. B. Garages: 1. The garage shall not comprise more than 55 percent of the viewable ground floor street-facing linear building frontage. This standard is based on the measurement of the entire garage structure and not on a measurement of the garage door or doors only. Corner A. Unit Size: The following unit size shall apply: 1. Floor Area: Five hundred (500) square foot minimum floor area for efficiency apartment units. Minimum eight hundred (800) square feet for a one-bedroom unit plus one hundred (100) square feet for each additional bedroom. Seven hundred (700) square foot minimum floor area for one-bedroom apartment dwelling units in retirement housing developments, plus one hundred (100) square feet for each additional bedroom. Garages, breezeways and porch floor spaces shall not be credited in determining the required floor area of units. B. Unit Construction: 1. Subdivision Requests: Building elevations and floor plans shall be furnished with subdivision requests illustrating exterior building material and colors to demonstrate compliance of this title. Building floor plans shall identify the interior storage space within each unit. 2. Decks or Porches: Provision shall be made for possible decks, porches or additions as part of the initial dwelling unit building plans. The unit lot shall be configured and sized to include decks or porches. 3. Exterior Building Finish: The exterior of attached/townhome dwelling units shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, attached/townhome dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: a. A minimum of twenty five percent (25%) of the combined area of all building facades of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone. b. Except for brick, stucco, and/or natural or artificial stone, no single building facade shall have more than seventy five percent (75%) of one type of exterior finish. c. Except for brick, stucco, and/or natural or artificial stone, no townhome dwelling structure shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of all building facades of one type of exterior finish. d. For the purpose of this Section and material calculations: M/I Sawgrass Concept Plan (city file no. 20-012) 5 April 23, 2020 Single Family and Twin homes Townhomes and Apartments lots are exempt from this requirement on one street elevation. 2. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior design of the home. C. Roof: 1. Roofing materials including asphalt shingles, wood shingles (including shake), concrete, clay, ceramic tile roofs or residential steel roofing material (with hidden fasteners) are required on all roofs. 2. Overhangs must be a minimum of 12 inches. D. Other Elevations: 1. Equal architectural treatment on all sides of the building (materials, articulation, etc.) shall be used for all new residential construction when located on or visible from a street or public park. Each elevation facing a street or public park should use a minimum of 2 different materials and/or styles compatible with the front elevation as described in this Section. All other elevations shall make a good faith effort to demonstrate that elements of the front elevation have been considered for incorporation on these elevations. 2. Each side elevation shall have at least one window or door opening. 3. A maximum of 18 inches of the foundation wall may be exposed on any elevation. i. The area of the building facade shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. ii. Variations in texture or style (i.e., lap siding versus shake shingle siding) shall be considered as different materials meeting the requirements of this Section. iii. Integral colored split face (rock face) concrete block or plain concrete block shall not qualify for meeting the brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone material requirements. 4. Color. Each attached/townhome building shall feature a broad array of colors, including earth tones, muted natural colors found in surrounding landscape or other colors consistent with the adjacent neighborhood. Buildings in proximity to each other shall not look alike in terms of the combination of color siding, accent and roofing materials. The home or townhome building under consideration will be compared to two homes or townhome buildings on each side of it and to the three homes or town home buildings directly facing it. 5. Facades and walls: Each attached/townhome dwelling unit shall be articulated with projections, recesses, covered doorways, balconies, covered box or bay windows or other similar features, dividing large facades and walls into human scaled proportions similar to adjacent single-family dwellings. 6. Roofs. Each attached/townhome building shall feature a combination of primary and secondary roofs. Primary roofs shall be articulated by at least one of the following elements: a. Changes in place and elevation b. Dormers or gables c. Transitions to secondary roofs over entrances, garages, porches, bay windows. 7. Garages: a. Each dwelling unit shall include an attached garage. b. Garages shall comply with the following minimum size standards: i. For dwellings with basements: Four hundred forty (440) square feet. ii. For dwellings without basements: Five hundred forty (540) square feet. iii. Garages shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') in width. M/I Sawgrass Concept Plan (city file no. 20-012) 6 April 23, 2020 The PUD approvals granted the following PUD flexibility, which would be applied to the M/I development: 11. All Design Requirements for the RSF-3 district described in Section 1040.050, Subd. 8 shall be met, except that PUD flexibility is granted for the following: a. Adjacent homes may be allowed to have the same color and type of roofing product provided the architectural details and material colors for the home are different. b. Townhome/twinhome units will be granted some flexibility from the requirement that 5 different styles of home be provided in that neighborhood and from the requirement that adjacent homes not look alike. In these types of neighborhoods, some consistency between buildings is desired, but it is important to provide some variety with the homes. However, since no home plan has been provided, the City will work with the applicant to determine the extent of this flexibility when a development proposal for that site is submitted. c. PUD flexibility is provided to allow the face of the garage to exceed 55% of the building face and allow up to 60% for detached single family homes and 70% for twinhomes/townhomes. d. The intent of the ordinance is to require the side and rear of homes that are located on or visible from public parks or arterial streets to have architectural elements similar to the front elevation. These homes must continue materials and colors from the front elevation to the side and rear elevations. This may be through the use of the same window trim, accent bands or other elements found on the front of the home. Blank, flat elevations with only one siding color or material will not be permitted for these units. Additionally, M/I is requesting flexibility to allow 410 square floor garages for the townhomes where 440 square feet is required for units with basements and 540 square feet if required for townhomes without basements. Single family homes only need to provide a location for a one stall attached garage. At the February 27, 2020 meeting there were questions about the building architecture. The applicant has provided some concept renderings and they appear to generally comply with City standards and Sawgrass PUD standards. Infrastructure No updated infrastructure plans were submitted with the concept plan and the feasibility study notes that significant improvements have been made by the City and County since the 2014 review and those modification will need to be incorporated into the new Sawgrass plans. The formal submittal should include a ghost plat of the two parcels to the west and the church portion of the site to ensure appropriate street and utility stubs. M/I Sawgrass Concept Plan (city file no. 20-012) 7 April 23, 2020 Public Safety Public Safety has reviewed the concept plans and notes that a cul de sac or other acceptable turnaround will be required at the road in the northeast portion of the site if the trail/emergency vehicle access to CR 116 is not provided at this time. The standard fire code and building code requirements will apply. Natural Resources A High Quality Natural Community is located in the north (Maple Basswood Forest) and east (Floodplain Forest) areas of the site. Rush Creek and an unnamed tributary are adjacent to or within the site; consequently, a portion of the site is in the shoreland overlay district. A portion of the site is also located in the floodplain. Wetlands The 2013 wetland delineation will need to be updated and approved by the City as the LGU. Any impacts would require LGU approval. Floodplain There are approximately 3 acres of floodplain on the property. There are were no impacts proposed in the original approval and we do not expect any with this final plan. Shoreland A portion of the property along CR 10 is in the Shoreland Overly District. The applicant is received PUD flexibility to vary from the impervious surface, building height and lot width. Those approvals were extended through August. Landscaping and Tree Preservation We do not have a landscape plan at this point; however, staff notes that tree preservation and landscaping was a significant part of the discussion with the original approvals. While the City does not have a tree preservation ordinance, as part of this PUD it was a significant discussion. The 2014 tree survey showed more than 8,000 significant trees on site and 44.6% were proposed to be preserved. The applicant will need to show a final tree preservation plan that shows compliance with these preliminary approvals. • Staff notes that since the 2014 approvals, the landowner removed a number of trees. The trees were primarily located in the southeast portion of the site. The applicant will need to show how the tree preservation approved in 2014 will be met or ask another PUD modification. M/I Sawgrass Concept Plan (city file no. 20-012) 8 April 23, 2020 The original developer proposed to plant a minimum of three new trees on each lot and additional landscaping in common areas and along CR 10 for screening. This same level of landscaping is expected with this project and final landscape plan will be required to show compliance. Parks and Trails Park dedication will be a combination of park land dedication in the form of the off-road trails and cash. Park dedication will be based on the fee schedule in place at the time the final plat is released for recording. Sidewalks will be provided on one side of all public streets. A trail crossing to the City park south of County Road 10 will also be required. Summary Staff finds that the changes are generally consistent with the preliminary approvals and supports the request to proceed with the PUD amendment, PUD final plan and final plat. This would go to the Planning Commission for review and Council for action, but not require a public hearing. 4. Action: The applicant is requesting comments on this sketch plan. Any comments given by the City Council are advisory in nature and non-binding. While the comments on the sketch plan are non-binding, the applicant will consider the comments from the City Council when they prepare their formal submittal. However, the Council should provide clear direction: a. Whether the sketch plan is generally consistent with the approved plans and the development can simply proceed with the PUD amendment, final PUD development plan and final plat Or b. Whether the sketch plan varies too much from the approved plans. In that case, the applicant would be required to submit a new preliminary plat and PUD for approval prior to the final plat/PUD application. Attachments 1. Site Location Map 2. MI Narrative dated March 21, 2020 3. MI Concept Plans dated 4. Approved 2014 Sawgrass PUD Plan 5. Feasibility Study dated April 2020 Parcel ID:23-119-23-42-0004 A-T-B:Abstract Owner Name:Corcoran Bay Holdings Llc Market Total:$1,868,000 Parcel Address: 20400 Co Rd No 10 Corcoran, MN 55340 Tax Total: $107,515.62 (Payable: 2014) Property Type:Residential Sale Price: Home- stead:Non-Homestead Sale Date: Parcel Area: 103.33 acres 4,500,884 sq ft Sale Code: Map Scale: 1'' ≈ 800 ft. Print Date: 11/11/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 Page 1 of 1Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map 11/11/2014http://gis.hennepin.us/Property/print/default.aspx?C=456897.2084074169,4994064.37858... March 21, 2020 Brad Martens City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 66340 RE: Sawgrass Concept Plan Dear Mr. Martens, The purpose of this letter is to outline the proposed changes from the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Planned Unit Development for Sawgrass. The Sawgrass Preliminary Plat was originally approved for 246 homes on approximately 103 acres. The Seller of the property, Greg Ebert, desires to retain approximately 7.5 acres of the property on the west side and approximately 5 acres on the east side. The property on the east side would be given to St. Thomas the Apostle Church. Removing these two parcels will reduce the total land area of the Sawgrass plat to approximately 90 acres. At this time, M/I is requesting a review of the Concept Plan and Feasibility Study. The Concept Plan submitted will require some flexibilities with the approved Preliminary Plan Unit Development (PUD). Based on the revised Concept Plan, a PUD Amendment would be needed for the following items: 1. Eliminate 75-foot lots and replace with 55 and 65-foot lots. The change to the lot counts are summarized below in Table 1: Table 1. Lot Widths Original PUD Proposed PUD Amendment Lot Type # of Lots Side Yard Setback Lot Type # of Lots Side Yard Setback 55 feet 80 5 feet 55 feet 93 7.5 feet 65 feet 89 5 feet 65 feet 71 7.5 feet 75 feet 57 5 feet 75 feet 0 7.5 feet Townhomes 20 Townhomes 75 Twinhomes 0 Twinhomes 22 Total 246 261 In exchange for flexibility in the lot width, M/I Homes would increase the side yard setback from 5 feet to 7.5 feet. 2. Increase the variety of foundation types. The preliminary plat was predominantly basement lots. It is proposed to have the following foundation types for each product type as summarized in Table 2: Table 2. Proposed Foundation Types Product Type Proposed Foundation Type Single Family Mix between full, lookout and walkout basements Villa Half of the foundations being slab with remainder a mix of basement types Townhomes Foundation type flexibility. Either slab or basement townhomes. Twinhomes All slab foundations. In exchange for flexibility with foundation types, M/I Homes can offer an additional product type. 3. Reduction in the required garage size for HOA maintained lots. Per Section 1040.070 – RMF-3, Subd. 8.5 All townhome design shall comply with standards in Section 1040.060, Subd. 9 (RMF-1 Design Requirements). Item 7.b of Subd. 9 of Section 1040.060 requires minimum garage sizes based on foundation types. Twinhomes would also fall under Section 1040.060 – RMF-1 with minimum garage sizes. The Villa, Townhomes and Twinhomes would all be HOA maintained. Table 3 outlines what is required per the City Code and what is proposed. Table 3. Garage Sizes Product Type Required Garage Size per SMF-1 Proposed Garage Size Single Family 440 square feet 440 square feet Villa Basement: 440 square feet Slab: 540 square feet 440 square feet for basement and slab Townhomes Basement: 440 square feet Slab: 540 square feet 410 square feet for basement and slab Twinhomes Basement: 440 square feet Slab: 540 square feet 410 square feet for basement and slab On HOA maintained lots all lawncare and snow removal is covered by the HOA. On Townhomes and twinhomes all exterior care is also part of the HOA’s responsibility. Major large items stored within a garage are yard and snow removal equipment and with the HOA maintained properties, this equipment is eliminated, thus less room is required within the garage. In exchange for flexibility with the garage sizes, M/I Homes will commit to providing lawn care and snow removal as part of the HOA.in order to eliminate the need to store exterior maintenance equipment. 4. Increase to approved garage face percentage on Villas. The original PUD allowed flexibility to allow the face of the garage to exceed 55% of the building face and allow up to 60% for detached single family homes and 70% for twinhomes/townhomes. At the time of PUD approval, there was no builder identified for the project. Now that specific home styles are known, we are requesting an increase from 60% to 62% for single family homes is request to accommodate three car garages. This is similar to what was approved with the PUD for Bass Lake Crossing. Table 4. Garage Face Percentage Product Type Garage Building Face per Code Flexibility Awarded with PUD Flexibility Requested with PUD Amendment Single Family 55% 60% 62% Villa 55% 60% 62% Townhomes 55% 70% 70% Twinhomes 55% 70% 70% In exchange for flexibility, M/I Homes will assure that there will be no more than three homes contiguous to each other that exceed the 60% requirement. Three car garages will also only be placed on lots greater than 65-feeet. Lastly, M/I is agreeing to increase the side yard setbacks from 5 feet to 7.5 feet, which will allow for additional green space and landscape plantings. The changes described above would not require any changes to the sewer, water, or street layout. The plat remains essentially unchanged with the exception of the lot dimensions and the requested PUD flexibility. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 763-586-7278. Sincerely, Lauren Grouws, PE Land Development Manager R O A D C ROADDR O A D D R O A D D R O A D E R O A D F ROADCR O A D G R O A D F ROADFROADI5050 50 5050 5 0 50 5 0 505050 50 50 50505050 505 0 50 50R=6 0 R=604 2.5 4 2.5 8 5 5050 6064.1E E E E E E E E E E E PROPANE TANK SS ROCK FLAG WELL EXX XXXXXXXXXMAIL E E E CLVT CLVT E E C XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXE E SCONTROL CLVT PROPANE TANK CLVT C TRAN SSXXXX >>SLAB VILLAS: 55' - 48, 57' - 9, 65' - 20 BASEMENT VILLAS: 55' - 32, 57' - 4, 65' - 10 TOWNHOMES: 75 UNITS TWINHOMES: 22 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY: 41 LOTS55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB65'/SLAB65'/SLAB6 5 '/ S L A B 65'/SLAB 65' /SLAB65'/SLAB65'/SLAB57'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB5 7 '/W O 55'/W O 55'/W O 5 5 '/W O 5 5 '/W O 5 7 '/W O 5 5 '/ W O 5 5 '/ W O 5 7 '/ W O 55'/ WO 55'/ WO 55'/ WO 55'/ WO 55'/ WO 55'/WO 55'/SLAB5 5 '/ S L AB 5 5'/ S L A B 55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB57'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB57'/SLAB57'/SLAB55'/SLAB65'/SLAB65'/SLAB65'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB65'/SLAB65'/SLAB65'/SLAB65'/SLAB55'/WO55'/WO65'/WO57'/WO55'/WO65'/WO65'/WO65'/ WO 65'/ WO 65'/ WO 65'/ WO 65'/ WO 6 5 '/ W O65'/ W O65'/ W O65'/ W O65'/ W O 6 5 '/W O 65'/W O 65'/LO65'/LO 65'/FB65'/FB65'/FB65'/FB65'/FB65'/FB65'/FB65'/FB65'/FB65'/FB65'/FB65'/FB65'/LO65'/LO65'/W O 6 5 '/W O 6 5 '/ W O 6 5 '/ W O 65'/ WO 65'/ WO 65'/ WO 65'/FB65'/LO65'/LO65'/LO65'/LO65'/LO55'/SLAB6 5 '/ S L A B 55'/SLAB 65'/SLAB55'/SLAB65'/SLAB57'/SLAB57'/SLAB57'/SLAB57'/SLAB57'/SLAB55'/SLAB65'/SLAB55'/SLAB65'/SLAB55'/SLAB55'/SLAB65'/SLAB55'/SLAB65'/WO55'/WO65'/W O5 5 '/W O65'/ W O55'/ WO 65'/ WO 55'/WO 6 5'/W O 5 5'/WO 6 5'/W O 6 5'/W O 5 5'/W O 5 5'/WO 55'/FB55'/FB55'/FB55'/FB55'/FB57'/FB57'/FB55'/FB55'/FB55'/FBTOTAL SLAB VILLAS - 77 UNITS TOTAL BASEMENT VILLAS - 46 UNITS TOTAL 261 N SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO. REVISION CHECKED Plot Date: 03/12/2020 - 3:48pmDrawing name: V:\1938\active\193804970\CAD\Dwg\Concept Plan\193804970C100.dwgXrefs:, 193804970XSPV, 193804970XSNO, 193804970XSXW, 193804970XSXT, 193804970XSRDTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.CONCEPT PLANM/I HOMESCORCORAN, MN 193804970 0 100 200 N Square Feet: 1,743 Bedrooms: 3 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 0 Garages: 2 Stories: 1 Cedarwood II Elevation A Elevation B Elevation C Elevation D Because we are constantly improving our product, we reserve the right to revise, change, and/or substitute product features, dimensions, specifications, architectural details and designs without notice. This brochure is for illustration purposes only and is not part of a legal contract. Prices are subject to change without notice. Room dimensions are approximate and calculated from inside of partition. Printed 9-19 Square Feet: 1,936 Bedrooms: 3 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 0 Garages: 3 Stories: 1 Sycamore Elevation A - Stone Elevation D - Brick Elevation C - Stone Elevation E - Stone Because we are constantly improving our product, we reserve the right to revise, change, and/or substitute product features, dimensions, specifications, architectural details and designs without notice. This brochure is for illustration purposes only and is not part of a legal contract. Prices are subject to change without notice. Room dimensions are approximate and calculated from inside of partition. Printed 2-19 Elevation A Elevation B Elevation D Elevation E Square Feet: 2,214 Bedrooms: 4 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 1 Garages: 3 Stories: 2 Taylor Elevation C .noititrap fo edisni morf detaluclac dna etamixorppa era snoisnemid mooR .eciton tuohtiw egnahc ot tcejbus era secirP .tcartnoc lagel a fo trap ton si dna ylno sesoprup noitartsulli rof si eruhcorb sihT 91-2 detnirP OPT.BENCH FLEXROOM9'-4" x 10'-0"OPT. ARCHOPT. BOOKCASES FOYER FAMILYROOM15'-1" x 14'-5" DININGROOM9'-6" x 14'-5" UP DN 3-CARGARAGE KITCHEN MUDROOM OPT.WINDOW OPT.ARCH MUD ROOM OPT.CABINET OPT.WINDOW N 3 6 ° 1 7 '1 2 "W1 3 2 . 1 2 N89°36'01"W 2210.00N89°36'01"W 1175.21N 46°43'16" W 26.87 L = 514.30 R = 3545.77 Δ = 8°18'38" N55°01'54"W 449.76 L=111.43 R=1638.52 Δ=3°53'48"S0°03'25"E533.00S89°56'35"W 300.00 S0°03'25"E849.88L = 5 1 3 . 6 7 R = 5 6 9 5 . 7 7 Δ = 5 ° 1 0 '0 2 " N 4 1 ° 2 7'1 4 " W 1 0 8 8.7 3 N46°26'24"E 136.78 S47°18'36"E 226.15 S76°34'36"E 108.90 S29°31'00"W 19.38 S68°58'36"E 125.00 S29°31'00"W 194.15 L=121.16R=445.4 8Δ=15°34'5 8 " N89°28'17"W 62.67N0°05'35"E776.35S89°26'36"E 518.62 N0°05'35"E1844.37>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>O H P XXX X 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 1 2 3 4 5 2 1 3 1213 6 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 3 2 1 5 4 20 18 17 19 16 15 14 12 13 7 118910 5 6 3 4 2 1 16 151413 17 12111098 7 6543 2 1 14131211768910 54 3 2 1 1211109876543 2 1 9876543 2 1 6543 2 1 1817 16 3 15 14 13 11 12 9 10 8 7 6 5 4 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 9 8 10 11 13 1412 5 13 12 11 10 1 9 8 2 4 7 3 10 9 12 13 14 15 16 7 6 8 18 17 3 5 2 4 1 7 651423 6 7 8 5 3 4 1 2 9 11 12 10 13 22 23 21 15 16 19 18 17 14 1 2 3 4 2 3 1 5 6 4 9 10 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 ROAD A ROAD B ROADC R O A D C ROADDR O A D D R O A D D R O A D E R O A D F ROADCR O A D G R O A D F ROADFROADI85050 50 505050 50 5050 5 0 50 5 0 505050 50 54 50545050 505 0 50 50 R=60 R=60R=604 2.5 4 2.5 8 5 506 5045 50 4515 78 910 1211 1314 5 6 1 2 43 4 12 3 7 65 89 BLOCK 1 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AREA/SQ FT 9622.81 6600.00 8117.32 9414.13 9324.28 9456.06 9927.58 9324.28 18462.07 BLOCK 2 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 AREA/SQ FT 6888.93 6868.79 6870.00 7228.45 13996.66 BLOCK 3 LOTS 1 2 3 AREA/SQ FT 9577.29 6600.00 6555.77 BLOCK 4 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AREA/SQ FT 12801.12 7800.00 7800.00 7861.22 10191.41 9170.97 9819.64 11036.15 11036.15 11036.15 11036.15 9499.25 11857.04 7800.00 7800.00 7800.00 10688.85 BLOCK 5 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 AREA/SQ FT 8426.57 8408.40 8162.39 8115.36 8116.42 8116.67 8094.75 8434.39 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 11490.94 12254.40 9351.76 9400.74 9400.74 9392.06 9418.47 9593.00 BLOCK 6 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AREA/SQ FT 7800.00 8867.53 11845.96 8099.13 8735.95 8602.50 8213.01 8368.79 8241.59 8264.84 8405.55 8551.72 8542.12 8731.36 8715.49 8731.44 8719.54 BLOCK 7 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 AREA/SQ FT 10800.00 7968.97 8214.80 8411.96 8411.96 8178.24 8416.29 8416.29 8178.24 8411.96 8411.96 8178.24 8369.50 10435.31 BLOCK 8 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 AREA/SQ FT 10800.00 7992.67 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8093.77 8139.34 11768.60 BLOCK 9 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AREA/SQ FT 13529.88 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 13130.78 BLOCK 10 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 AREA/SQ FT 11337.18 8542.12 8542.12 8542.12 8542.12 10972.23 BLOCK 11 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 AREA/SQ FT 11827.49 7849.13 8511.08 7430.90 6837.18 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6625.06 7097.93 7214.24 7031.47 7008.01 7533.22 BLOCK 12 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 AREA/SQ FT 6955.94 6694.09 6626.15 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.56 6995.05 7219.10 7347.32 7282.97 7477.44 7216.39 8881.17 BLOCK 13 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 AREA/SQ FT 14344.11 6598.13 6600.00 7153.05 9598.67 6600.00 6600.00 6947.32 7839.14 7302.88 6600.00 11887.02 BLOCK 14 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 AREA/SQ FT 10064.92 6608.18 6600.00 7076.20 7626.67 10088.47 8331.71 7381.80 6875.00 6875.00 8605.46 8240.70 6921.30 6875.00 6875.00 6875.00 7003.18 11565.76 BLOCK 15 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AREA/SQ FT 12795.84 10528.73 9794.09 10986.54 13501.00 18564.66 20182.26 12943.45 BLOCK 16 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 AREA/SQ FT 9774.33 9000.00 9000.00 9000.00 9714.22 10325.89 10000.58 10032.78 9981.76 9981.76 9981.76 10028.68 10179.53 10210.88 9518.60 9651.07 9872.97 9607.32 14267.07 12005.05 12153.70 12755.28 12755.28 BLOCK 17 LOTS 1 2 3 4 AREA/SQ FT 10864.08 9410.60 9437.60 9719.13 BLOCK 18 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 AREA/SQ FT 9607.31 9151.53 9110.96 9387.14 9766.23 9734.70 BLOCK 19 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AREA/SQ FT 12764.38 9127.69 9514.72 9524.09 9347.32 9347.32 9335.57 9928.06 10760.45 10257.83 BLOCK 20 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AREA/SQ FT 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 25296.60 BLOCK 21 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 AREA/SQ FT 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 86862.68 OUTLOTS OUTLOTS A B C D E F G H I J K L M N AREA/SQ FT 5925.89 40838.20 176255.78 21389.72 29963.80 121212.65 37356.73 43657.01 25210.32 1857.93 3148.77 87208.31 12569.93 599409.89 O P Q R 29140.02 6892.16 1828.35 24009.36 S T U V 3735.93 150350.58 69626.26 1930.08 W 14606.59 X Y Z 566.02 64585.73 52083.26 AA 2666.70 OUTLOTS OUTLOTS AREA/SQ FT OUTLOTS OUTLOTS AREA/SQ FT SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO. REVISION CHECKED Plot Date: 11/19/2014 - 2:00pmDrawing name: V:\1938\miscellaneous\193802577\CAD\Dwg\193802577V401.dwgXrefs:, 193802577XSPV, 193802577XBRD, 193802577XSXV, 193802577XSXT, 193802577V301TOPO, 193802577XSXW, 193802577XSXV200SCALETHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.PEACHTREE PARTNERSSAWGRASS, CORCORAN, MN 193802577 N 0 200 400 Legal Description per Title Commitment File No. 37676 Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 which was formerly called the Minneapolis Monticello road, excepting therefrom the following described parcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feet of the East 990.00 feet of the South 792.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter said last described point being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet to the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet to the actual point of beginning. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SAWGRASS Land Surveyor: Linda H. Brown Stantec Consulting 3717 23rd Street South St. Cloud, MN 56301 320-229-5535 Owner/Developer: Peachtree Partners David Newman 1521 94th Lane NE Minneapolis, MN 55449 763-792-8975 Current Zoning - UR (Urban Reserve) and RMF-3 High Density Residential Proposed Zoning - PUD (Planned Unit Development) Total Acreage of Plat = 103.32 Acres+/- E. LINE OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119 R23 SURVEY LINE PER HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 10, PLAT 8 NE CORNER OF THE NE1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 NE CORNER OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 (BROKEN PK NAIL) E. LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 SE CORNER OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 (HENNEPIN CTY CIM) S. LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 SW CORNER OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD #10 66.00 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY FOR C.S.A.H. 10 PER DOC. NO. 3867013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1718 19 OUTLOT A OUTLOTBOUTLOT C OUTLOT D O U T LO TEO U T LO T FOUTLOTGOUTLOTH OUTLOT I 11 OUTLOTOO U T LO T POUTLOT M OUTLOT N VICINITY & ZONING MAP C.S.A.H.10 C.S.A.H.50 SITE ZONED UR ZONED RMF-3 Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet to the center line of County Road #10 and to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet to the center line of County Road #10; thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of 205.00 feet more or less to actual point of beginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West to the center line of the road; thence Southeasterly along said center line to an intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the point of beginning; thence North 45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center of County Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point of beginning. Tract B: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerline of Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet to the intersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, to the intersection with said East line; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet to the point of beginning. Tract C: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty-three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty-three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property V4.01 PRELIMINARY PLAT MM REH LHB LHBSURVEYORMINNESOTALINDA H. BROWN23682SEE SHEET V4.02 FOR LEGEND OUTLOTK OUTLOT L O U T L O T Z OUTLOT R OUTLOTQOUTLOT S OUTLOT Y OUTLOT T OUTLOT U OUTL OTVOUTLOT W OUTLOT X O U T L O T A A NOTE: ALL PONDS WILL BE PLATTED IN OUTLOTS AND DEDICATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN THE FINAL PLAT 20 21 O U T L O T J 1 OUTLOT/EASEMENT 11/19/14 L =R JOHN C GLEASON 20310 CO RD NO 10 HAMEL MN 55340 S0°03'25"E533.00S89°56'35"W 300.00 S0°03'25"E849.883385.21 S0°05'35"W1844.37SURVEY LINE PER HENNEPIN OUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 10, PLAT 8 E. LINE OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 N 3 6 ° 1 7'1 2 "W1 3 2 . 1 2 E. LINE OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXZONE AE PER FEMA MAP ZONE X (OTHER FLOOD AREA) PER FEMA MAP ZONE AE PER FEMA MAP FO-C F O -C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>X X X X XXXXXXXXX12 13 6 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 3 2 1 5 4 4 20 18 17 19 16 15 14 12 13 7 118910 5 6 3 4 2 1 5 16 15 1413 17 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 543 2 1 6 141312117 6 8 9 10 5 4 3 2 1 7 12 11 109876 5 4 3 2 1 8 9 8765 4 3 3 11 9 10 8 7 6 5 4 1 2 11 22 23 21 15 16 19 18 17 14 16 1 2 3 4 17 2 3 1 5 6 4 9 10 7 8 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 18 OUTLOT C OUTLOT D 113.31 14.66 146.19R =7 0 0 .0 0Δ=5 5 °0 7 '5 3 " R=500.00 Δ=11°29'27" 57.68167.64R=1000.00Δ=23°41'22"R=250.00Δ =6 3 °4 5 '3 6 "79.51 ROAD C R O A D C ROADDR O A D D R O A D E ROADIR=300.00Δ=27°31'11"R=300.0 0 Δ=7°30 '21 " 40.54 R =4 5 0 .0 0 Δ =3 4 °5 4 '4 6 "2.46R =8 5 0 .0 0 Δ =2 0 °4 3 '0 1 " 2 3 .1 5 R=400.00Δ=63°08'32"R=400.00Δ=47°13'53"51.45141.61R=500.00Δ=21°55'25"9.48R=200.00Δ=54°24'40"313.2370.41R=250.00Δ=37°27'46" 2 7 7 .6 4 2 0 8 . 4 4 R =4 0 0 .0 0 8 6 °4 0 '5 9 "R=500.00Δ=31°05'42"80.83R=1000.00Δ=5°37'53"36.00 OUTLOT N OUTLOT M OUTLOT E5050 50 50 5 0 50 5 0 505050 50815555 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 106 656565 6 5 6 5 659068727 2 7 2 7 2 7 2 72 72 70 66 94 93 69 65 65656565 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6565901246565656569706 5 65 6 5 6565121656565907 1 70656 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 65 65 65 65 109 1337 8 79 78 79 7975 7 0 7 0 7 0 70656 5 6 5 6 5 1098 5 6 5 757575757575937 575757512385757575 75777687R=6 0 R=605 3.672.6117.7117.1 92.663.170.8120.2 7 1 .5 7 9 .9 5 5 .0 64.169.995.8 90.8 65.5 69.1 122.2122.574.973.573.3156.177.898.91 07.1 98 1 0 8 9175757575757510080808080787573.3134.462.677.2135.5 65.367.8L=64.4L=157.526.84 7. 7 98.512.16 6 .5 1 1 . 1 1 4 1 . 754.743.511.555.062.5146.7131.765.065.0L=53.4L=44.1 L = 4 4 .1L=44.1L =56.365.065.065.089.6132.5 3 5 .3 1 2 .0 1 2 6.4 120.0 124.398.376.167.3133.0 132.5132.5132.51 3 2 .5 120.0 85.065.065.065.0120.0 120.041.565.065.065.071.01 20.0 1 20.0 1 20.0 124.2 45.777.072.0L=82.2L=82.2L=82.2L=82.2L=72.0120.0 120.0 122.8 123.072.072.01 2 0.0 1 2 1.772.047.1161.3L =6 3 .2 L =6 1 .3 L =61.3 L=61.3 L=61.3 L=61.3 L=128.9 L =7 3 .9 L=63.2 L =6 3 .2 L =6 3 .2 121.478.7 56.2 121.4121.4120.6121.4121.4121.4120.6120.66 1 .9 6 4 .6 7 1 .9 1 2 0 . 6 1 2 2 . 0 1 2 6 . 0 120.55 6.7 5 6.8 56.7 56.858.7 6 1 .9 6 1 .9 61.961.571.478.06 1 .2 120.0L =6 1 .1 L =6 1 .7 L =6 1 .7 L=72.5L =7 2 .5 L =7 2 .5 L =8 4.1 L=84.2 L=84.1 L= 8 4.2 L = 8 4 . 1126.4126.4120.0120.0125.7125.5120.01 2 4 . 8 1 2 4 . 1 1 2 1 . 3 127.4121.34 2 . 481.61 2 0 .0 6 5. 0 120.06 5 . 0 L=62.8 L=62.8L=62.8L=6 2 .8L=6 2 .8 L =6 2 .8 L =6 2 .8 L =6 2 .8 L=6 2 .8 L=62.690.0125.273.8 73.2 67.0 67.2 120.8120.8127.2120.87 3 .8 7 3 .2 7 3 .8 127.2120.87 3.8 7 3.2 7 3.8 120.8120.8127.21 2 0 . 874.073.81 2 0 . 8 1 2 0 .090.068.6104.1121.1L=71.7 L=74.4L=7 4.4L=7 4 .4 L =7 4 .4 L =7 4 .4 L =7 4 .4 L=74.4 90.0120.669.8120.062.2120.061.1120.061.1120.06 1 .1120.06 1 .1 6 1 .1120.01 20 . 0 6 1 .11 2 0 . 0 61.163.01 2 0 . 0 1 2 0 .0 90.0.3 L =6 1 .3 L =6 1 .3 L =6 1 .3 L =61.3 L=61.3 L=101.9121.4100.1 78.7 121.478.7 121.47 8 .7 121.47 8 .7 121.47 8 .7 1 2 1 . 478.71 2 1 . 478.7L=126.3L=50.3L=50.3L =5 1 . 3 5 5. 0 5 5 . 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5 . 0 1 3 4 .6 1 2 8 .3 5 2 . 7 7 0. 0 6 0 . 4 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5 . 0 5 5. 0133.825.474.7120.0120.0120.0120.0120.0120.0120.2L=131.2 1 2 1 .4 L =100.L=71.5L=71.5L=71.5L=8 3.7 120.0120.030.878.978.9 78.9 7 8.9 1 20.0 37.744.875.61 4 8 .6 76.280.21 2 2 .3 1 2 5 .381.61 2 1 .8 88.044.4121.5 1 2 1 .5 44.488.0L=50.2L=5 0 .2 L=50.2 115.674.074.168.5123.0 125.0 1 24.9 L=91.466.31 2 0.0 L=73.2L=73.2L=73.2L=73.2L=73.2L=120 .7 1 2 0.5 120.277.882.11 2 5.8 L =1 2 2 . 4 120.7 121.5 82.181.8120.7 1 2 0.0 120.0121.2 63.981.8121.5L=70.7L=70.775.0L=71.5121.5 80.975.075.8121.5 122.5 1 2 1 .9108.8424.9 1700.5 L=121.8 120.841.5194.7144.0119.1134.9 78.7 78.778.778.8 7 0 .5 7 1 .9 7 1 .9 7 1 .9 1 9 8 .4 120.5280.04 7 .2 89.3136.81 3 6 . 8 136.8136.8 241.6178.498.2158.6120.01 1 3.5 113.5 57.1 1 8 2 .6 284.91 2 7 .7 1 2 0.0281.2 2 20.8 2 2 0 .8 147.857.17 0 2 .8 1 1 6 .8 L = 2 0 .0145.5132.4132.4121.5156.482.675.6109.7157.8 7 8.9 120.01 3 4 .3 =100.1121.5 88.0231.890.990.81 2 1.9 L=35.0280.1163.981.8145.75 5 .6 6 2.1 120.9L=140.6366.8 L=155.8L =279.3514.8L=24.5 1 2 0 .0 300.0 L =8 3 .0 OUTLOT K OUTLOT L OUTLOTQOUTLOT R OUTLOT S OUTLOT T OUTLOT U OUTLOTVOUTLOT W OUTLOT Y O U T L O T ZL=4 4 .1 650.5SHORELAND DISTRICT LINE S H O R E L A N D D I S T R I C T L I N E 20604 COUNTY RD #10 CORCORAN MN 55340 SCHOOL DIST NO 883 BUSINESS MANAGER ROCKFORD MN 55373 S0°03'25"E533.00N 46°43'16" W 26.87 N55°01'54"W 449.76 L=111.43 R =1638.52 Δ=3°53'48" L=514.30 R =3545.77 Δ =8°18'38" O H P O H PXX XXXXXFO-C FO-C FO-C FO-C FO-C FO-C FO-C O H P O H PXX XXXXX7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 2 1 3 3 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B 186.14 128.5725.74R=250.00 Δ=13°53'07" 113.31 ROAD A ROAD B ROAD CR=300.00Δ=14°04'05"R=300.00Δ=21°07'02"79.71145.0036.005050 50 508155 9355 55555555 55 555555558082 55 55 R=60 164.1 83.2 113.353.1189.2123.197.845.7 30.081.7 L=3 7.8 L =40.0L=37.8L=37.8L=37.8 55.0 80.6 129.0123.2131.4116.5129.0115.8129.0116.3130.779.755.088.3 120.0120.0120.0115.7129.0115.8 L=70.555.055.055.654.743.5124.9 11.555.062.5124.9 124.9 126.2 146.755.0 47.1 120.080.1 55.0 55.0120.013.7108.8467.0 L =513.3 19.3 216.1 108.8173.630.0190.1 98.2124.9 OUT OUTLOT X SHORELAND DISTRICT LINE 33'7'268'34580"W17'3'14 31'11 43"W17.676543219811234522131213678910111415161732154432018171916151412137118910563421516151413171211109876543216141312117689105432171211109876543218987654321965432110181716315141311129108765412111234576981011131412125131211101982473131091213141516768181735241147651423156785341291112101322232115161918171416123417231564910781912345618LLLLLL6.8.55.7R =25 .00Δ=13°53 '0"3.4.6 46.R=70 0 .0Δ=5°0 7'53 R=500 .Δ=11°2 9'27 "7.76.8 . 1 R =25 0.00 Δ=8°08'4 6 0.=25 0.00 Δ=41°32'4 8R=20.00Δ=1 °20 '33"7.R1000Δ23422=200Δ=3°46"R=300 00Δ=14 °04'05"R=300 00Δ=21 °7'02"R =30.00Δ=27°31 '11"R 30.00Δ=7°30 '1"0.R450 .00Δ=34°5 446".4R 850 .00Δ=20°401"3 .1R =40 .00Δ=63°08 '2"=40 0.00 Δ=47°13'5 3R=5 .00Δ=2 1°55 '25"R=5 000Δ=2 8°3 '52R=50 00Δ=2°4 3'16 R=29 70Δ=5°5 '46R=29 00Δ=4°5 '049.4R=2 0.00Δ=5 4°2'40"R =25 0.00 Δ=37°27'4 67 7 . 0 8 .R =50 .00 Δ=22°08 '2"R=400.00R =40 0.00 Δ=27°04 '5"R=400.0 01 9 .R =30 0.00 Δ=12°58'2 6 6.R =35 .00 Δ=34°25 '"R=350 .003.R=250 .008.R 40.00Δ=86°4 059"2.3.3R =30 .00 Δ=20°30 '0"8 0.R =30 .00 Δ=15°42 '0"R =30.00Δ=32°17 0"3.R370 .00Δ=62°520"R=370 00Δ=12 4'52"R=32500Δ=4 543'19"R=500.0 0Δ 31°5'4 "R=000 00Δ=5 7'53"6.8 6 5.7 3 5.0 5 7. 5 5. 6.2 5 5. 5.4 5 5. 5.0 5 4. 5.0 6 8. 2.6 5 1. 5.0 5 5. 5.0 5 5. 9 6 .LLLL8155 9 555555 55555582555555555 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 555555566 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5555555555579 8 9 6 6 5 5 5 5 1 5 796 2 5 5 5 5 6 868 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 9 98797 979791 1065656565656565108906872727272727272706694 936965656565656565656565659065697065656 5 65127 17065656565656565656565101337 87978797975707070706 56 56565 8 5 6 5 7 5 7 5 7 5 7 5 8 8 9989909292929396937575757512385757575107575757575750098109 1757575757575108080808078753 . 0 22.6 .1 1 . 2331.29 1695.81529242424265.07.120.80.5.5.20.08.32. 5 .2 .2 6.20 24 98.76.67.3.32323 22020205.77.72.20202223 72722 0 2 1 72478.6.21206164712 0 2 2 2 62 05 6. 5 6.6.6.8 .1 .1 .1.1.1.8.1 .20.26.252 4 . 2 4 . 2 1 . 2 . 42 02 06 5. 3.3.7.7.333333 272 0 74732 0 2 0 .9068049211 20.1 .1 .1 .2 0 .1.3.2 0 .0.008.8887821782 1 782 1 157.7 .20.2 0 . 7 .2 0.7.1.47. 60. 64. 50.26.26.20.20.3 428 5 2. 7 0. 6 0. 5 5. 5 5. 5 5. 5 5. 5 5. 5 5. 5 5. 5 5. 6 4. 1 4.23.202020202020202020202 123.5 5 . 5 5 . 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.021.20.5 5. 5 5. 5 5. 5 5. 5 5. 6 3.202020.20.21.21.68. 34.21.68.34.850 2 . 2 4 . 2 205 5. 5 5. 5.0 5.0 402 020 1.0194.120.20.6.8 202020.255 5. 5 5.252525.155.0 5.0 5.0 4.325252525 274 23325.2020212122.4 2 .79.43.04 7 5. 7 5. 7 5.2066 20200.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 20202 0 2020202020 3078888.9 75.4 8 76.80.2 225 81.63. 2 121 2524 2 0. 2 0.207.2.25. 20.21.2.1.20. 2 0.20.21.3.1.212121222167 9.0830.0.240 201.94.44.19348.88.0 .1 .1 .1 .98204 78 93 6 363658 201 3.1378 28 42 72 08120477.7.7 .7 . 0 2 . 22.2629.29.1 0 . 3 8. 02.020.8722.1 625.1 5 6 7. 60.4 .4.4.64.245.32.56.097 8.203 4 21 21 806381.45552 154 1611TLO153 8. 8 . 0 6 R=100.002.03.R=1 00 .0 0R=1 00 .0 0R=2 50.001.35 .6 .15789101211131456124329 25 19.0826 1430.30.0 30.30.0.0.0.0 0.0.00.0.0 0.0.00.0.0 0.0.00.0.80.30.30.0.0.0.8 0.30.30.0.0 0 .0 .80. 3 0300.0000080. 8 0.80.4123765890.0.0 0.0.0 0 0.0.0 0.0.0 0 0.0.0 0.0.0 0 0.0.0 0.0.0 0 46.00.53. 23.2120LOLO10.00 .6.1.2. 2.65.74.60.0.00.0>>>>SHORELAND DISTRICT LINE SHORELAND DISTRICT LINE SHORELAND DISTRICT LINE S H O RE LA ND D I ST RIC TLIN E SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO. REVISION CHECKED Plot Date: 11/19/2014 - 2:04pmDrawing name: V:\1938\miscellaneous\193802577\CAD\Dwg\193802577V401.dwgXrefs:, 193802577XSPV, 193802577XBRD, 193802577XSXV, 193802577XSXT, 193802577V301TOPO, 193802577XSXW, 193802577XSXV200SCALETHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.PEACHTREE PARTNERSSAWGRASS, CORCORAN, MN 193802577 N 0 100 200 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SAWGRASS Current Zoning - UR (Urban Reserve) and RMF-3 High Density Residential Proposed Zoning - PUD (Planned Unit Development) Total Acreage of Plat = 103.32 Acres+/- Land Surveyor: Linda H. Brown Stantec Consulting 3717 23rd Street South St. Cloud, MN 56301 320-229-5535 Owner/Developer: Peachtree Partners David Newman 1521 94th Lane NE Minneapolis, MN 55449 763-792-8975 VICINITY & ZONING MAP C.S.A.H.10 C.S.A.H.50 SITE ZONED UR ZONED RMF-3 Legend DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET DENOTES HENNEPIN COUNTY CIM AND CAPPED "STANTEC 23682" FO-B OHP TREE LINE WETLAND FIBER OPTIC QUALITY LEVEL B OVERHEAD POWER BOUNDARY CENTERLINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE FLOOD PLAIN BOUNDARY EXISTING LOT LINE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SECTION LINE QUARTER SECTION LINE SIXTEENTH SECTION LINE E CTV C E AC CLVT SCONTROL DELINEATED WETLAND POWER POLE LIGHT POLE TRAFFIC SIGN OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE CABLE TV PEDISTAL COMMUNICATION PEDISTAL ELECTRIC PEDISTAL AIR CONDITIONING UNIT CULVERT X X X X WOOD RAIL FENCE WIRE BOX FENCE BARB WIRE FENCE 20 V4.02 PRELIMINARY PLAT MM REH LHB LHBLAND SURVEYORMINNESOTALINDA H. BROWN2368251010 5 5 5 5525' REAR SETBACK5' SIDE SETBACK5' SIDE SETBACK STREET R.O.W.12012055 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 55 MINIMUM LOT AREA - 6,500 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK - 55 FT MINIMUM LOT DEPTH - 120 FT FRONT YARD SETBACK - 20 FT (MIN) REAR YARD SETBACK - 25 FT SIDE YARD HOUSE / GARAGE SETBACK - 5 FT SIDE YARD STREET SETBACK - 25 FT 51010 5 5 5 5525' REAR SETBACK5' SIDE SETBACK5' SIDE SETBACK STREET R.O.W.12012065 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 65 MINIMUM LOT AREA - 7,800 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK - 65 FT MINIMUM LOT DEPTH - 120 FT FRONT YARD SETBACK - 20 FT (MIN) REAR YARD SETBACK - 25 FT SIDE YARD HOUSE / GARAGE SETBACK - 5 FT SIDE YARD STREET SETBACK - 25 FT 51010 5 5 5 5520' FRONT SETBACK (MIN) 25' REAR SETBACK5' SIDE SETBACK5' SIDE SETBACK STREET R.O.W.12012075 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 75 MINIMUM LOT AREA - 9,000 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK - 75 FT MINIMUM LOT DEPTH - 120 FT FRONT YARD SETBACK - 20 FT (MIN) REAR YARD SETBACK - 25 FT SIDE YARD HOUSE / GARAGE SETBACK - 5 FT SIDE YARD STREET SETBACK - 25 FT PHASING MAP PHASE 1 PHASE3PHASE 2 PHASE 3 WETLAND SETBACK WETLAND BUFFER DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT NOTE: ALL PONDS WILL BE PLATTED IN OUTLOTS AND DEDICATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN THE FINAL PLAT SHORELAND DISTRICT LINE STREET R.O.W.808030 MINIMUM LOT AREA - 4,000 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK - 30 FT MINIMUM LOT DEPTH - 80 FT FRONT YARD SETBACK - 20 FT (MIN) REAR YARD SETBACK - 20 FT SIDE YARD HOUSE / GARAGE SETBACK - 10 FT (ONE SIDE ONLY) SIDE YARD STREET SETBACK - 10 FT (ONE SIDE ONLY) 30 510DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1020' FRONT SETBACK (MIN)20' FRONT SETBACK (MIN) 1 OUTLOT/EASEMENT 11/19/14 JOSEPH ANDRES 8220 CAIN RD CORCORAN MN 55340 10-50 PROPERTIES LLC 4279 HAWKSBURY CIR EAGAN MN 55123 CORAN NO 116 MN 55340 DALE & PATRICIA PATNODE 1200 NICOLLET AVE #209 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 DALE PATNODE 1200 NICOLLET MALL #209 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 PERRY W & MARGARET L MILLER 20102 COUNTY RD #10 HAMEL MN 55340 SCOTT & MARIE TREPTAU 20045 CO RD 10 S0°05'35"W792.03S46°26'24"W136.78N 4 7°1 8'36" W 22 6.15( M ) N89°28'17"W 62.67 S76°34'36"E108.90 S29°31'00"W 19.38 S68°58'36"E125.00 S29°31'00"W194.15L=121.16R=445.48Δ=15°34'58" N 47°52'W (D)S45°53'W(D)OHP OHPXXXXXXXXXXXOHP O H POHP O H P F O - C F O - C F O -C F O-C FO-C FO-C FO-C FO-C FO- G-C G-C G-C G-C G-C XXXXXXXXXXX10 11 13 14 12 1RΔ=53.00R=350.00 Δ=34°25'33" R=350.00Δ=6°23'44" 33.90 R=250.00Δ=18°18'13" 28.75 OUTLOT H 5055 55 55 55 55 797185.9 59.9 137.667.6L = 51.5 L=51.5 L=51.5 L=53.5121.234.3 121.668.3 34.3 123.458.7 55.8119.0125.470.9 100.2129.8102.5 70.9 L=117.6 62.6187.0122.2186.986.8 R=1 0 0 . 0 0 Δ=39° 1 8 ' 4 0"12.0043.28R=100.0 0 Δ=24°29'0 6 "R=100.00Δ =65°14'49"5 5 .7 0 2 6 .2 150 4515 7 8 9 10 5 6 1 2 43 589.5125.019.4108.9 226.1 114.5 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.030.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.08 0.0 30.030.08 0.0 3 0 .0 3 0 .0 80.03 0 .0 3 0 .080.080.0 80.0 80.0 8 0.0 80.01 230.30.080.0 30.030.80.0 23.2 L=75.3 21 20 OUTLOUTLOTAA110.510.01 0 .1 16.2 15.7 14.620.0 20.0 20.0L = 5 1 3 . 6 7 R = 5 6 9 5 . 7 7 Δ = 5 ° 1 0 '0 2 " BRIAN D PURRMAN/KIM I SANDEY 7923 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 TIMOTHY & LISA SMITH 7935 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 HENRY R HALLGREN 8001 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 VIRGIL W SPEARS LOURRIENE L SPEARS 8025 CITY RD 116 HAMEL MN 55340 DANIEL P CARLSON 8045 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 ROBERT & THERESA CROUSE 20301 CO RD NO 10 HAMEL MN 55340 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 CHURCH OF ST THOMAS 20000 CO RD NO 10 HAMEL MN 55340ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCH 20020 CO RD NO 10 HAMEL MN 55340 990.00 792.00518.60 S0°05'35"W1844.37N89°26'36"W 518.62 S0°05'35"W792.03CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD #10 66.00 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY FOR C.S.A.H. 10 PER DOC. NO. 3867013 N 3 6 ° 1 7 '1 2 "W1 3 2 . 1 2 N 4 1 ° 2 7'1 4 " W 1 0 8 8.7 3 S46°26'24"W136.78N 47°18'36" W 226.15(M ) N 47°5 2'W (D)S45°53'W(D)XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXO H POHP F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O -C F O -C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXL =1 1 2 .617.6416 17 1 2 1 16 15 1413 17 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 43 2 1 6 141312117 6 8 9 10 5 4 3 2 1 7 12 11 109876 5 4 3 2 1 8 9 8765 4 3 2 1 9 654 3 2 1 10 18 17 16 3 15 14 13 11 12 9 10 8 7 6 5 4 1 2 11 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 9 8 10 11 13 14 12 12 5 13 12 11 10 1 9 8 2 4 7 3 13 10 9 12 13 14 15 16 7 6 8 18 17 3 5 2 4 1 14 7 651 42315 6 7 8 5 3 4 1 2 9 11 12 10 13 22 23 21 15 16 19 18 17 14 16 1 2 3 4 17 2 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 18 OUTLOT D OUTLOT F OUTLOT G 14.66 146.19R =7 0 0 .0 0Δ=5 5 °0 7 '5 3 " R=500.00 Δ=11°29'27" 57.68 176.654 8 . 1 1 R =2 5 0.0 0 Δ =8 ° 0 8'4 6 " 1 6 0.8 8 R=250.00Δ=4 1°32'48"119.32R=250.00Δ=13°20'33"53.00167.64R O A D C ROR O A D D R O A D D R O A D E R O A D F ROADCR O A D G R O A D F ROADFR=300.00Δ=27°31'11"R=30 0.0 0 Δ=7°3 0 '2 1 " 40.54 R =4 5 0 .0 0 Δ =3 4 °5 4 '4 6 "2.46R =8 5 0 .0 0 Δ =2 0 °4 3 '0 1 "R=400.00Δ=47°13'53"51.45141.61R=500.00Δ=21°55'25"R=500.00Δ=28°38'52"R =5 0 0 .0 0Δ=2 2 °4 3 '1 6 "R =2 9 7 .0 0Δ=1 5 °5 1 '4 6 "R=297.00Δ=14°56'04"313.2370.41R=250.00Δ=37°27'46" 2 7 7 .6 4 2 0 8 .4 4 R = 5 0 0.00 Δ = 2 2°08'23" R=400.00 Δ=1°26'39" R = 4 0 0.0 0 Δ = 2 7° 0 4'5 7 " R =4 0 0 . 0 0 Δ =2 ° 3 9 ' 1 0 " 1 1 9 . 3 0 R=3 0 0 . 0 0Δ=1 2 ° 5 8 '2 4 " 2 6 6.3 3 R=350.00 Δ=34°25'33" R=350.00Δ=6°23'44" 33.90 R=250.00Δ=18°18'13" 28.75 R =4 0 0 .0 0 Δ =8 6 °4 0 '5 9 " 22.71 73.36 R =300.0 0 Δ=20°30'0 7 " 2 8 0.5 0 R = 300.00 Δ = 15°42'02" R=300.00Δ=32°17'20" 43.03 R =370.00Δ =62°55'20"R=370.00Δ=12°54'52"R=325.00Δ=45°43'19"R=500.00Δ=31°05'42"80.83R=1000.00Δ=5°37'53"36.00 8 6 5.6 1 7 3 .5 8 5.0 5 7.7 5 5.0 7 6.2 5 5.0 6 5.4 5 5.0 5 5.0 5 4.3 5 5.0 6 8.7 7 2.6 5 1.0 5 5.0 5 5.0 5 5.0 5 5.0 9 6 . 4 OUTLOT H OUTLOT N OUTLOT M OUTLOT E5050 50 505 0 5 0 505050 50 54 50545050 505 0 50 50815555 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 55 55 66 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 55 55 55 55 7989 6 6 5 5 5 5 1 5 1 1135568796 2 5 5 5 5 6 8 68 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 1 7155555555555 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 9987979 7 9 79 110 106 656565 6 5 6 5 65651089068727 2 7 2 7 2 7 2 72 72 70 66 94 93 69 65 65656565 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 65659012465907 1 70657 8 79 78 79 7975 7 0 7 0 7 0 70656 5 6 5 6 5 1098 5 6 5 7575757575757 5 7 5 7 5 7 5 8 8 99 89 9 0 9 2 92929396937 575757512385757575 75777687105757 5 7 5 7 57575 100 R=6085.9 59.9 5 2.7 5 5.2 5 5 . 8181.0194.2L=53.7 5 4.9 5 3.672.6117.7117.1 92.663.170.8120.2 7 1 .5 7 9 .9 64.169.995.8 90.8 65.5 69.1 122.2122.51 0 6 . 1 74.973.573.3751001 1 9 .5 7 0 . 6 6 4.6 73.6119.01 5 1.7 7 0 . 0 137.667.655.052.15 2.3 7 8.8 71.3 5 6.4 7 3.3 102.5126.669.7 72.9 7 1.0 9 2.8 95.1 9 5 .8 101.073.3134.462.677.2135.5 4 2.5 4 2.5 8 5 504 7 . 7 3 3 . 0 22.2 169.649.098.512.16 6 .5 1 1 . 1 1 4 1 . 7 2 6 6.6131.765.089.685.065.0120.0 120.071.0120.0 28.9 L =7 3 .9 L=63.2 L =6 6 1 .9 1 2 2 . 0 1 2 6 . 0 120.55 6.7 5 6.8 56.7 56.858.7 6 1 .9 6 1 .9 61.961.571.478.06 1 .2 120.0L =6 1 .1 L =6 1 .7 L =6 1 .7 L=72.5L =7 2 .5 L =7 2 .5 L=84.2 L=84.1 L= 8 4.2 L = 8 4 . 1126.4126.4120.0120.0125.7125.5120.01 2 4 . 8 1 2 4 . 1 1 2 1 . 3 127.4121.34 2 . 481.61 2 0 .0 6 5. 0 120.06 5. 0 L=62.8 L=62.8L=62.8L=6 2 .8L=6 2 .8 L =6 2 .8 L =6 2 .8 L =6 2 .8 L=6 2 .8 L=62.690.0125.273.8 73.2 67.0 67.2 120.8120.8127.2120.87 3 .8 7 3 .2 7 3 .8 127.2120.87 3.8 7 3.2 7 3.8 120.8120.8127.21 2 0 . 874.073.81 2 0 . 8 1 2 0 .090.068.6104.1121.1L=71.7 L=74.4L=7 4 .4L=7 4 .4 L =7 4 .4 L =7 4 .4 L =7 4 .4 L=74.4 90.0120.669.8120.062.2120.061.1120.061.1120.06 1 .1120.06 1 .1 6 1 .1120.01 20 .06 1 .11 2 0 . 0 61.163.01 2 0 .0 1 2 0 .0 90.0L=101.9L=61.3L=61.3 L =6 1 .3 L =6 1 .3 L =6 1 .3 L =61.3 L=61.3 L=101.9121.4100.1 78.7 121.478.7 121.47 8 .7 121.47 8 .7 121.47 8 .7 1 2 1 . 478.71 2 1 . 478.71 2 1.4 115.2L=126.357.4120.0L=102.5L=84.1L =8 4 .1 L =8 4 .1 L =8 4.1 L=118.9 L=123.457.1120.05 7 .1120.01 2 0 . 0 5 7 .1 1 2 0.0 57.1L =116.9 91.647.1 60.2 64.5 50.5 126.4L=50.3L=50.3L =5 1 . 3 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 L = 5 2.5 L = 5 2.5 L=52.5 L=71.3 126.8120.8120.81 3 4 .6 1 2 8 .3 5 2. 7 7 0 . 0 6 0. 4 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 0 5 5. 5 6 4. 7 1 4. 5133.825.474.7123.6120.0120.0120.0120.0120.0120.0120.0120.0120.0120.2L=131.2 1 2 1 .4 123.75 5 . 4 5 5 . 4 56 .45 5.0 5 5.0 5 5.0 5 5.0 L = 51.5 L=51.5 L=51.5 L=53.5121.2120.05 5.1 5 5.0 5 5.0 5 5.0 5 5.0 6 3.5120.0120.0120.0120.0121.9121.268.1 34.3 121.668.3 34.3 123.458.7 55.8119.0125.470.9 L =126.4 3 2 . 2 6 4 . 2 120.398.55 5.0 5 5.0 L=166.9 120.0 5 5.0 5 5.0 L =88.555.040.9120.0 55.01 2 0 .0 47.3120.041.0119.83 4.1 120.0120.01 6.8 120.0120.0120.0125.05 5.0 5 5.0 L =5 0 . 3 L=50.3L=51.355.0L=121.4125.0125.0L=67.5 125.0115.65 5.0 5 5.0 5 5.0 5 4.3125.0125.0125.0125.0127.21 4 2 .0 1 3 3 .3 125.0120.0 70.865.755.055.0100.2120.0 1 2 1 .4 121.0 L=91.3 L =7 0 .4 L =7 0 .3 L =7 0.3L=70.3L=94.5122.035.0 2 4 2 . 81 79.6124.8143.3105.4126.8104.8 74.3 83.4 124.8126.8125.0124.9L=66.7 120.07 5.0 7 5.0 7 5.0 L=108.8 L=99.7L=99.7L=104.8L =100.7L=71.5L=71.5L=71.5L=8 3 .7 L =9 9 .7120.0125.466.7 66.2 120.0120.0120.09 0.4 7 5.0 7 5.0 7 5.0 120.0120.01 2 0 . 0 120.0 120.0 120.0 1 2 0 .0120.0120.030.878.978.9 78.9 7 8.9 1 20.0 37.744.875.61 4 8 .6 76.280.21 2 2 .3 1 2 5 .381.663.91 2 1 .8 88.044.4121.5 1 2 1 .5 44.488.0L=50.2L=5 0 .2 L=50.2 115.674.074.168.5123.0 125.0 124.9 L=91.466.31 2 0.0 1 2 0.5 120.277.882.1L =1 2 2 . 4 121.5L=70.7L=70.775.0L=71.5121.5 80.975.075.8121.5 122.5 1 2 1 .9120.5280.158.6120.01 1 3.5 113.5 57.1 1 8 2 .6 284.91 2 7 .7 1 2 0 .0 281.2 2 20.8 2 2 0 .8 147.857.4 L =2 7 7 .4 L =6 6 .6L = 3 6 . 8 57.15 7 .1 5 7 .1 57.1 L = 5 1 3 .057.17 0 2 .8 222.4 126.8129.8129.31 1 0 . 9 3 3 8.6 102.4 102.5 70.9 122.21 1 6 .8 L=42.2 L = 2 0 .0125.53 1 5.4 6 7.7 60.9 133.0 6 4 .8 64.864.864.262.6145.5132.4132.4121.5156.482.675.6109.7157.8 7 8.9 120.01 3 4 .3 L=65.3L=100.1121.5 88.0231.890.990.81 2 1 .9 L=35.0280.1L = 6 0.8 L=140.695.7115.6L=214.57 4 1.9 L=155.8L =279.3514.8L=24.5 1 2 0 .0 L =8 3 .0 6 OUTLOT K OUTLOT LOUTLOTV O U T L O T Z OUTLOT J 11 OUTLOTP115.63 8.5 L=121.38 . 0 8 . 0 8 . 0 2 3 2 .0 R=1 0 0 . 0 0 Δ=39° 1 8 ' 4 0"12.0043.28R=100.0 0 Δ=24°29'0 6 "R=100.00Δ =65°14'49"245.45R=250.00Δ=32°45'10"31.345 5 .7 0 2 6 .2 150 45 50 457 8 9 10 12 11 13 14 5 6 1 2 43 129.6 589.5226.1 114.5 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.030.030.080.0 30.030.080.030.030.080.0 30.030.080.030.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.08 0.0 30.030.08 0.0 3 0 .0 3 0 .0 80.03 0 .0 3 0 .080.080.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 8 0.0 80.04 1 2 3 7 6 5 8 9 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 80.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 80.030.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 80.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 80.0 346.64 0 .2 4 0.5 63.3 23.2 L=75.3 21 20 OUTLOT OOUTLOTAA2 1 .7 10.010.010.510.01 0 .1 16.2 10.010.010.031.42.5 2.6 20.0 20.0 15.7 14.620.0 20.0 20.0SHORELAND DISTRICT LINE S H O R E L A N D D I S T R I C T L I N E SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO. REVISION CHECKED Plot Date: 11/19/2014 - 1:58pmDrawing name: V:\1938\miscellaneous\193802577\CAD\Dwg\193802577V401.dwgXrefs:, 193802577XSPV, 193802577XBRD, 193802577XSXV, 193802577XSXT, 193802577V301TOPO, 193802577XSXW, 193802577XSXV200SCALETHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.PEACHTREE PARTNERSSAWGRASS, CORCORAN, MN 193802577 N 0 100 200 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SAWGRASS 105 510 DIMENSIONED. SHOWN THUS: BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINES AND 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS SEE SHEET V4.02 FOR LEGEND TYPICAL LOT EASEMENT LINES SETBACK LINES LOT LINES 20' FRONT SETBACK (MIN)25' REAR SETBACK 5' SIDESETBACKCurrent Zoning - UR (Urban Reserve) and RMF-3 High Density Residential Proposed Zoning - PUD (Planned Unit Development) Total Acreage of Plat = 103.32 Acres+/- Land Surveyor: Linda H. Brown Stantec Consulting 3717 23rd Street South St. Cloud, MN 56301 320-229-5535 Owner/Developer: Peachtree Partners David Newman 1521 94th Lane NE Minneapolis, MN 55449 763-792-8975 V4.03 PRELIMINARY PLAT MM REH LHB LBHLAND SURVEYORMINNESOTALINDA H. BROWN2368220 20'x40' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF NSP PER DOC. NO. 4046052 NOTE: ALL PONDS WILL BE PLATTED IN OUTLOTS AND DEDICATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN THE FINAL PLAT REFER TO SHEET V4.04 FOR MORE DETAIL 1 OUTLOT/EASEMENT 11/19/14 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 CO RD NO 116 CORCORAN MN 55340 DALE & PATRICIA PATNODE 1200 NICOLLET AVE #209 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 DALE PATNODE 1200 NICOLLET MALL #209 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 PERRY W & MARGARET L MILLER 20102 COUNTY RD #10 HAMEL MN 55340 ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCH 20020 CO RD NO 10 HAMEL MN 55340 5 18.OHPXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXO H POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHP O H P O H P F O - C F O -C F O -C F O -C F O-C FO-C FO-C XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX13 14 12 13 12 11 10 7 6 18 3 5 2 4 1 14 1 423 15R=250.00Δ=41°32'48"119.32R=250.00Δ=13°20'33"53.000.00 '33" R=350.00Δ=6°23'44" 33.90 R=250.00Δ=18°18'13"28.75 02" R=300.00Δ=32°17'20"43.03 6 5.6 1 7 3 .5 8 5.0 5 7.7 50 5055 55 55 79113556879 8 1 7155555555555 5 89 9 0 7 5 7 57575 100 85.9 59.9 6 4.6 73.6119.0137.667.655.052.17 3.3 102.5126.669.7 72.9 95.1 9 5 .8 22.2 L=51.5 L=53.5 123.458.7 55.8119.0125.470.9 .9 1 20.0 L =88.555.01 20.0 1 2 0 .0 L =5 0 . 3 L=50.3L=51.355.01 4 2 .0 1 3 3 .3 125.01 20.0 70.865.755.055.0100.21 20.0 1 2 1 .4 121.0 L=91.3 L =7 0 .4 L =7 0 .3 143.3126.8104.8 74.3 83.4 126.8125.0L=108.8 L =9 9 .7 129.870.9 187.0122.295.7 186.986.8 R = 1 0 0. 0 0 Δ =39 °1 8'4 0 "12.0043.28R=100.00Δ=24°29'06 "R=100.00Δ=65°14'49"245.45R=250.00Δ=32°45'10"31.345 5 .7 0 2 6 .2 150 45 50 4515 7 8 9 10 12 11 13 14 5 6 1 2 4 3 129.6 589.5125.019.4108.9 226.1 114.5 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.030.030.080.0 30.030.080.030.030.080.0 30.030.080.030.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.08 0.0 30.030.08 0.0 3 0 .0 3 0 .0 80.03 0 .0 3 0 .080.080.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 8 0.0 80.04 1 2 3 7 6 5 8 9 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 80.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 80.030.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 80.0 30.030.080.0 30.030.080.0 80.0 346.64 0 .2 4 0.5 63.3 23.2 L=75.3 21 20 OUTLOT OOUTLOTAA2 1 .7 10.010.010.510.01 0 .1 16.2 10.010.010.031.42.5 2.6 20.0 2 0.0 15.7 14.620.0 20.0 20.0SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO. REVISION CHECKED Plot Date: 11/19/2014 - 10:08amDrawing name: V:\1938\miscellaneous\193802577\CAD\Dwg\193802577V401.dwgXrefs:, 193802577XSPV, 193802577XBRD, 193802577XSXV, 193802577XSXT, 193802577V301TOPO, 193802577XSXW, 193802577XSXV200SCALETHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.PEACHTREE PARTNERSSAWGRASS, CORCORAN, MN 193802577 N 0 50 100 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SAWGRASS 105 510 DIMENSIONED. SHOWN THUS: BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINES AND 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS SEE SHEET V4.02 FOR LEGEND TYPICAL LOT EASEMENT LINES SETBACK LINES LOT LINES 20' FRONT SETBACK (MIN)25' REAR SETBACK 5' SIDESETBACKCurrent Zoning - UR (Urban Reserve) and RMF-3 High Density Residential Proposed Zoning - PUD (Planned Unit Development) Total Acreage of Plat = 103.32 Acres+/- Land Surveyor: Linda H. Brown Stantec Consulting 3717 23rd Street South St. Cloud, MN 56301 320-229-5535 Owner/Developer: Peachtree Partners David Newman 1521 94th Lane NE Minneapolis, MN 55449 763-792-8975 V4.04 PRELIMINARY PLAT MM REH LHB LBHLAND SURVEYORMINNESOTALINDA H. BROWN2368220 NOTE: ALL PONDS WILL BE PLATTED IN OUTLOTS AND DEDICATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN THE FINAL PLAT STREET R.O.W.808030 MINIMUM LOT AREA - 4,000 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK - 30 FT MINIMUM LOT DEPTH - 80 FT FRONT YARD SETBACK - 20 FT REAR YARD SETBACK - 20 FT SIDE YARD HOUSE / GARAGE SETBACK - 10 FT (ONE SIDE ONLY) SIDE YARD STREET SETBACK - 10 FT (ONE SIDE ONLY) 30 510DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 101 OUTLOT/EASEMENT 11/19/14 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>O H P O H P XXXXX X X 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 2 1 3 12 13 6 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 3 2 1 5 4 4 3 20 18 17 19 16 15 14 12 13 7 118910 5 6 3 4 2 1 5 16 151413 17 121110 9 8 7 6 543 2 1 6 1413121176 8 9 10 5 4 3 2 1 7 12111098765 4 3 2 1 8 9 87654 3 2 1 9 6543 2 1 10 18 17 16 3 15 14 13 11 12 9 10 8 7 6 5 4 1 2 11 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 9 8 10 11 13 1412 12 5 13 12 11 10 1 9 8 2 4 7 3 13 10 9 12 13 14 15 16 7 6 8 18 17 3 5 2 4 1 14 7 65142315 6 7 8 5 3 4 1 2 9 11 12 10 13 22 23 21 15 16 19 18 17 14 16 1 2 3 4 17 2 3 1 5 6 4 9 10 7 8 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 18 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B OUTLOT C OUTLOT D OUTLOT F OUTLOT G ROAD A ROAD B ROAD C R O A D C ROADDR O A D D R O A D D R O A D E R O A D F ROADCR O A D G R O A D F ROADFROADI8 OUTLOT H OUTLOT N OUTLOT M OUTLOT E5050 50 505050 50 5050 5 0 50 5 0 505050 50 54 50545050 505 0 50 50 R=60 R=6 0 R=604 2.5 4 2.5 8 5 506 OUTLOT K OUTLOT L OUTLOTQOUTLOT R OUTLOT S OUTLOT T OUTLOT U OUTLOTVOUTLOT W OUTLOT X OUTLOT Y O U T L O T Z OUTLOT J 11 OUTLOT P5045 50 4515 7 8 9 10 12 11 13 14 5 6 1 2 43 4 1 2 3 7 6 5 8 9 21 20 OUTLOT OOUTLOTAASHORELAND DISTRICT LINE SHORELAND DISTRICT LINE S H O R E L A N D D I S T R I C T LI N E SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO. REVISION CHECKED Plot Date: 11/19/2014 - 1:55pmDrawing name: V:\1938\miscellaneous\193802577\CAD\Dwg\193802577V405.dwgXrefs:, 193802577XSPV, 193802577XBRD, 193802577XSXV, 193802577XSXT, 193802577V301TOPO, 193802577XSXW, 193802577XSXV200SCALETHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.PEACHTREE PARTNERSSAWGRASS, CORCORAN, MN 193802577 N 0 135 270 Land Surveyor: Linda H. Brown Stantec Consulting 3717 23rd Street South St. Cloud, MN 56301 320-229-5535 Owner/Developer: Peachtree Partners David Newman 1521 94th Lane NE Minneapolis, MN 55449 763-792-8975 Current Zoning - UR (Urban Reserve) and RMF-3 High Density Residential Proposed Zoning - PUD (Planned Unit Development) Total Acreage of Plat = 103.32 Acres+/- VICINITY & ZONING MAP C.S.A.H.10 C.S.A.H.50 SITE ZONED UR ZONED RMF-3 V4.05 PRELIMINARY PLAT MM REH LHB LHBSURVEYORMINNESOTALINDA H. BROWN23682SEE SHEET V4.02 FOR LEGEND NOTE: ALL PONDS WILL BE PLATTED IN OUTLOTS AND DEDICATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN THE FINAL PLAT PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SAWGRASS WENCK File #2294-0056 April 2020 Prepared by: WENCK Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Corcoran, MN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Sawgrass Development 2020_MI Homes Infrastructure Feasibility Study April 2020 i T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................1-1 2.0 SEWER ........................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Trunk Sewer and Lift Station................................................................2-1 2.2 Connections and Stubs........................................................................2-2 2.3 Cost Estimate ....................................................................................2-2 2.4 Findings ............................................................................................2-2 3.0 WATER........................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Water Supply and Trunk System...........................................................3-1 3.2 Looping and Connections.....................................................................3-1 3.3 Modeling ...........................................................................................3-1 3.4 Water Costs.......................................................................................3-3 3.5 Findings ............................................................................................3-3 4.0 WATER RESOURCES ....................................................................................4-1 4.1 Regulatory Overview...........................................................................4-1 4.2 Watershed Setting and Land Use ..........................................................4-1 4.3 Stormwater Management.....................................................................4-2 4.4 Findings ............................................................................................4-2 5.0 TRANSPORTATION......................................................................................5-1 5.1 Background .......................................................................................5-1 5.2 Main Entrance at CR 10.......................................................................5-1 5.3 City Street Stubs................................................................................5-1 5.4 Findings ............................................................................................5-1 6.0 FINANCING.................................................................................................6-1 6.1 Summary ..........................................................................................6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................7-1 April 2020 ii T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx Table of Contents (Cont.) IN-TEXT TABLES Table 1. Range of Water Pressure (psi) Across the Sawgrass Development.....................3-2 Table 2. Range of Fire Flows (gpm) Across the Sawgrass Development..........................3-2 FIGURES 1 Utility and Road Alignments 2 Floodplain APPENDICES A 2014 Council Engineer Memo B Master Sewer Trunk Plan SE District C Master Water Trunk Plan D Stormwater Modeling Guidelines E North Access Road Layout April 2020 1-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx 1.0 Introduction This report looks specifically at the feasibility of providing sewer and water service, stormwater management framework, and transportation needs for the development. This parcel was previously studied in 2014 and titled “Sawgrass”. The 2020 development is consistent in land use (residential) and the trunk infrastructure identified in this report remains consistent with prior feasibility study and the updated master plans for water and sewer. Improvements in city utilities and the intersection at the County “10/50” have occurred since 2014 and these are taken into account with this update. However, the engineering plans submitted are 2014 plans and will need significant modifications as the project moves through the approval process. Financing options of the development necessary for infrastructure for the development typically follow the approach of: Prior Feasibility Study identified water and sewer as the developer’s financial responsibility including trunk water, lift station and force mains and transportation. On-site infrastructure is managed by the developer Upsizing of on-site trunk utilities are provided credit, with eligibility determined during the approval process Trunk sewer and water fees (TLAC) will be updated in 2020 Off-site projects are typically managed by the City (engineering, bidding and construction management) and financed through an escrow The financial package will be further detailed and negotiated as the project moves forward and culminates in the overall Developer Agreement which is updated for each phase of the development. This draft report should be viewed as a working document based upon the information provided to the City. The report will be reviewed and finalized based on Council input or additional information. April 2020 2-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx 2.0 Sewer The prior feasibility study (findings in Appendix A) listed infrastructure necessary for the 2014 development, however significant improvements have occurred. Items that now currently exist for the 2020 Feasibility Study include: City Lift Station is located north of CR 10 Force main is located adjacent to the property connecting at CR 116 This review takes into account current infrastructure however the overall network of sewer has not changed from the 2014 system. 2.1 TRUNK SEWER AND LIFT STATION Within the Sawgrass development, the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Appendix B) indicates a north-south trunk sewer (18-inch) within the development and a western trunk (18-inch) and eastern trunk (10-inch) near the northern edge of the development. These three trunks connect near the northeast corner of the development and would ultimately discharge into a 30-inch trunk sewer flowing northward into Northeast Corcoran. The City is currently planning to upsize the 10-inch to 15-inch. The existing sanitary sewer that this development will connect to is located on the south side of the development, including an existing City lift station built with the 2016 Downtown Project that is located on the north side of CR 10 and receives flow from downtown Corcoran (see Figure 1). This lift station discharges via a 4-inch forcemain, which enlarges to a 6-inch forcemain at the southeast corner of the Sawgrass property. The forcemain ultimately discharges into a 15-inch sewer that flows east from CR 116. Given the topography in the Sawgrass development, with the lowest elevations in the northeast corner, the trunk sewers within the development will need to be discharged into a new but “temporary” lift station that pumps into a 6-inch forcemain back south to the connection point in the existing 6-inch forcemain at the southeast corner of the site (Figure 1). In essence, the existing City lift station at the south edge of the development is being moved to the northeast corner of the development. The invert at the temporary lift station for the three trunk sewers are to be elevation 927.00, per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Hence, the existing lift station is being taken out of service after the new lift station/forcemain is constructed and after the trunk sewer located between the two lift stations is constructed. Salvageable components of the existing lift station may be utilized to construct the new lift station, as long as all necessary temporary bypass pumping is conducted during the transitional construction period to ensure that existing sewer service is not interrupted. The new temporary lift station in the northeast corner of the Sawgrass development will be needed until the 30-inch northern trunk sewer is constructed which is not planned to occur until the SE capacity is reached. The trunk sewers that extend to the northwest corner of the Sawgrass development shall be constructed at minimum slope in order to provide the lowest possible invert at the northwest corner. April 2020 2-2 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx 2.2 CONNECTIONS AND STUBS Sewer stubs will be required for providing service to neighboring parcels. Stubs will be located and sized during development design reviews; however, for the purposes of this report it can be assumed a southerly connection to serve the City Park at the main entrance will be constructed under CR 10. A short stub will be extended in the west-central part of the development, as well as the 18-inch sewer stubbed to the northwest corner of the development. Lastly, a 15-inch stub will be constructed eastward from the new lift station to provide service to the future City property development. 2.3 COST ESTIMATE The significant sewer cost for the project is to construct a temporary lift station at the north edge of the development. (Estimated to be approximately $400,000). For the significant trunk sewer within the Sawgrass development, the upsize costs greater than 8-inch will be credited against the Trunk Line Area Charge (TLAC) as long as credits are available, therefore not increasing the development’s costs for regional trunk benefit. 2.4 FINDINGS The following key findings for the 2020 Feasibility Study update include: Moving the lift station location (at developer cost) is required for service of the entire development and consistency with the Master Trunk Sewer Plan. o The City will coordinate and direct the timing of the new lift station o Dedicating ROW for the roads to lift station and road access to CR 116 along the north edge of the development may occur in Phase 1 to ensure City access for the trunk system independent of development timing. o Current layout (2014 plan set) appears to have home lots within the required lift station area. o The lift station location also has road impacts and is the main stormwater discharge location therefore will require additional detailed analysis and significant modifications to the 2014 plans. Current layout (2014 plan set) appears to have lots within the required lift station area. Forcemain route is internal to the existing 6-inch forcemain near the southeast portion of the development. Construction of trunk lines to development’s boundaries as directed by the City for the west, east and south property boundaries. April 2020 3-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx 3.0 Water 3.1 WATER SUPPLY AND TRUNK SYSTEM The water supply for the Sawgrass development is consistent with all of SE Corcoran (Appendix C). Under a contract to provide water service, Maple Grove will continue to supply SE Corcoran with up to a maximum day demand (MDD) of 5 million gallons per day (MGD). The City’s water trunk system is nearby (Figure 1), with 12-inch trunk water located on the south-central portion of the development near City Lift Station and also at CR 116 on the east side of St. Thomas Church. The ultimate system includes connections to the west, north, and northeast (City Hall property). As shown on Figure 1, a 16-inch trunk water line will be constructed by the City along CR 116, with lateral water main connections extending into the development at the two access road locations on the east side of the development (Figure 1). Alternatively, at City’s discretion, the City may investigate the feasibility for the 16-inch to be routed through the Sawgrass development from near the existing hydrant located on the east side of St. Thomas Church (west side of CR 116). In this case, the northernmost water stub towards City property will be upsized to a 12-inch for connection to City property. In either scenario, the development will also be connected to the existing 12-inch trunk water line on the south side of the development, and that 12-inch will be extended through the development to a stub located at the northwest corner. 3.2 LOOPING AND CONNECTIONS The development will be required to provide looping, which increases fire flow, allows for water service to be maintained while a water main is under maintenance or repair, and also to ensure good water quality. Water stubs will be required at some locations for connection into neighboring parcels. Stubs will be located and sized during development design reviews; however, for the purposes of this report it can be assumed a southerly stub to serve as a future loop for the City Park may be constructed at the main entrance under CR 10. Secondly the western boundary requires a short stub to the property line at the west-central part of the development, as well as extending the 12-inch trunk water stub to the northwest corner of the development. The dead end cul-de-sac must also have an 8-inch water quality loop constructed, similar to what is shown on Figure 1, since future development timing to the west is unknown. On the east and northeast boundary two, 8-inch water stubs will be constructed at the two access road locations to provide lateral services out to CR 116. However, the northernmost water stub will be upsized to 12-inch if the 16-inck trunk water is routed through the Sawgrass development. April 2020 3-2 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx 3.3 MODELING Modeling for the trunk system shows the water tower would be constructed near the time when maximum day demand (MDD) reaches 1,225 gpm (1.75 MGD), or approximately 1,550 households (using a conservative MDD of 0.79 gpm per household). The water tower was assumed to be constructed somewhere just east of the existing downtown area, and the booster station would be constructed concurrently with the tower at a location just inside Corcoran at the Maple Grove feed point (along CR 10). The water demands placed on the pipe network total approximately 1,550 gpm (MDD). This is slightly above the demand at which the tower is estimated to be needed, as noted above. For the residential water demand, an average day demand (ADD) of 350 gallons per day (gpd) per household was utilized, which translates to approximately 0.24 gpm per household. The ratio of MDD to ADD is referred to as the “peaking factor”. Using a peaking factor of 3.25, the MDD is 1,138 gpd per household, or 0.79 gpm per household. The 350 gpd per household includes an allowance for contribution of water demand from commercial/industrial sources within a city. Hydraulic analysis of the SE Corcoran water system was conducted using the computer modeling software WaterCAD, which simulates the water system’s response to average and peak demands and firefighting scenarios. Each condition creates different responses in the water system. The modeling results help to identify and evaluate the various options for providing future water system infrastructure in SE Corcoran, including pipe and water tower sizing and the estimated timing of water tower construction. For residential areas, a target fire flow of 1,500 gpm (2-hour duration) is used. For commercial/ industrial areas, a higher target fire flow of 3,000 gpm (3-hour duration) is used. New commercial/ industrial buildings will be sprinklered and, as such, most of these buildings will ultimately have a lower acceptable target. However, 3,000 gpm is deemed a reasonable overall target, and allows for some conservatism in this safety-driven parameter. The model was run for two primary conditions. First, the Sawgrass development (and also the City property development) were assumed to be constructed; however, the analysis assumed the tower and booster station have not yet been constructed. Second, the model was run with the tower and booster added in. The resulting range of water pressure (psi) across the Sawgrass development were as follows: Table 1. Range of Water Pressure (psi) Across the Sawgrass Development Operating Condition Pre-Water Tower/Booster psi Post-Water Tower/Booster psi Average Day Demand 52.9 to 63.7 78.3 to 89.1 Maximum Day Demand 50.4 to 61.2 77.8 to 88.7 Peak Hour Demand 42.9 to 53.9 76.6 to 87.5 These pressures exceed the minimum recommended pressure of 35 psi and are thus adequate under all scenarios. The resulting range of fire flows (gpm) across the Sawgrass development were as follows: April 2020 3-3 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx Table 2. Range of Fire Flows (gpm) Across the Sawgrass Development Operating Condition Pre-Water Tower/Booster gpm Post-Water Tower/Booster gpm Maximum Day Demand 2,200 to 2,300 > 5,000 These fire flows assume looping to the west under ultimate buildout and exceed the residential target of 1,500 gpm and are thus adequate. Additional analysis for interim (dead end) at the northwest was conducted and show adequate fire flows. 3.4 WATER COSTS Costs for the development would be for laterals out to the CR 116 trunk water main. For oversizing trunk water within the Sawgrass development for regional benefit, the upsize costs are credited. Therefore, trunk main upsizing should not affect the developer’s financial pro forma as long as credits are available. 3.5 FINDINGS The following key findings for the 2020 Feasibility Study update include: Trunk water main is shown along CR 116, however an alternate route may be located through the development based on development timing and City discretion. Under the CR 116 scenario, developer responsible for all costs to pull laterals from CR 116. Internal to the development, any upsize costs are credited against the TLAC fee. Stubs to the south, west, and east property boundaries are required. Offsite water main work is typically a City-managed project and constructed through an escrow process. April 2020 3-4 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx 4.0 Water Resources In this chapter, the stormwater implications of this proposed development are reviewed in light of local and state regulations which typically are modified every few years. Drainage and floodplain are shown on Figure 2, however the stream route shown has been modified over the years and is not a formal drainage route. 4.1 REGULATORY OVERVIEW Stormwater management regulations in the proposed project area would be guided or directed by Corcoran’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (Local Plan) and the City’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Each of these documents has a larger regulatory context: The Local Plan reflects the goals, policies and rules of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission’s Third Generation Watershed Management Plan (Commission’s WMP). The SWPPP is a requirement of the City’s stormwater permit, formally known as the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. The MS4 permit is issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Among other goals, both documents include plans to meet pollutant load reductions calculated in the Elm Creek Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study. TMDL studies are required for surface waters that are designated as impaired – in other words, those that do not meet one or more state water quality standards. Floodplain is shown on Figure 2 and some low areas within the development occur along the north edge. County ditch is labeled from the City Park however, the ditch system has not been regulated by the County for several years. 4.2 WATERSHED SETTING AND LAND USE Stormwater from the proposed development generally drains to the north and northeast to an unnamed tributary. This tributary flows to the west and then north approximately 1,500 feet to where it discharges to South Fork Rush Creek. This reach of South Fork Rush Creek flows east for approximately 1.5 miles through a series of ditched wetlands to South Fork Rush Creek Reach 732 which is impaired for chloride, E. coli, as well as fish and macroinvertebrate IBIs. The TMDL report identified phosphorus as a primary stressors for the fish and macroinvertebrate impairments, and therefore a phosphorus TMDL was completed for this reach as well. South Fork Rush Creek Reach 732 eventually drains to Rush Creek Reach 528 and then Elm Creek Reach 508. Both of these reaches are impaired for several parameters including: chloride, dissolved oxygen, E. coli, fish and macroinvertebrate IBIs, sediment, and phosphorus. Thus, improved stormwater management within the proposed development will benefit South Fork Rush Creek as well as other downstream waterbodies in the greater Elm Creek Watershed. Land use and cover in the proposed development is a mix of natural and agricultural with minor residential (farm homestead) use and several wetlands. This pattern is typical of Corcoran, which is still a predominantly agricultural community with scattered low-density residential development and an abundance of wetlands. Development is increasing in the City, however, and the change from agricultural to non-agricultural land use presents opportunities to better manage stormwater runoff. This is true of the proposed development April 2020 3-5 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx site, where land use will change from row crops and farm homestead to suburban residential. Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) installed during construction will protect water quality in South Fork Rush Creek and the ditched wetland complexes downstream of the site. 4.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MI Homes development changes the land cover from agricultural/wooded/wetlands to suburban residential. Agricultural use of the land would cease, replaced by both pervious lawns/open space and impervious surfaces that will change the landscape and impact stormwater runoff. Although cessation of agriculture generally benefits water quality by reducing export of nutrients and sediment, construction of additional impervious surfaces, such as the roads, driveways and sidewalks in this residential development, increases the rate, volume, and pollutant load to nearby surface waters. Turn lane improvements to CR 10 would also slightly increase impervious surface area and, like neighborhood roads and driveways, would require practices to mitigate the impact of impervious stormwater runoff. Mitigation is accomplished by aligning development plans with stormwater regulations. Corcoran’s Local Plan, in agreement with the Commission’s WMP, requires that certain development plans be submitted to the Commission for review. The purpose of the review is to ensure that the developer’s plans for stormwater management during and after construction meet the Commission’s rules regarding the rate, volume and pollutant load of stormwater runoff, along with other rules regarding wetland alteration, erosion and sediment control and other aspects of surface water protection. This adherence to Commission rules is one of the strategies Corcoran has chosen to also meet its TMDL obligations. The implementation plan calls on Corcoran to apply these standards when land use changes, a strategy that is expected to have the net result of improving the quality of stormwater runoff. Stormwater modeling guidelines are in Appendix D, and as noted FEMA floodplain modifications and offsite water quality improvements are listed. In addition to improved stormwater management, restoration or improvement of the wetlands in the development can also benefit water quality. The details of any restoration and its benefits will be determined as the project moves forward. Complementing the Local Plan, Corcoran’s SWPPP requires plan review, construction site erosion and sediment control, and post-construction stormwater management. Construction site inspections by the City or its authorized staff would begin with land-disturbing activity and end with final stabilization of exposed soils. After construction, the City would enter an agreement with the homeowners’ association or similar group to ensure that stormwater Best Management Practices continue to function as intended. 4.4 FINDINGS Stormwater improvements are necessary within the development to meet regulations of the WMO. The Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission’s development rules and standards will apply. Stormwater improvements would also need to meet the goals of Corcoran’s Local Plan and the Elm Creek TMDL study. April 2020 3-6 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx o To move towards meeting load reduction goals, the City’s Local Surface Water Plan identifies that improvements to water resources will occur with development. o Large developments are participating financially in water resource projects to meet City’s obligations under land use changes. Corcoran has stormwater guidelines for hydrology and hydraulics to consistently manage stormwater events in new developments. These guidelines including Atlas 14 events shall be implemented in stormwater modeling analysis and may affect the 2014 stormwater management system. o Guidelines will be updated for 2020 and further review of the development will occur during the plan approval and WMO permitting process. Downstream identification/mitigation of additional volume will engage the adjacent landowners and WMO. o Modeling of the development drainage, potential drainage improvements, and floodplain may be needed to refine the project scope. The main discharge point is a main infrastructure area with road, lift station and stormwater and will require additional detailed study and landowner engagement. The City obtained the LGU responsibility for implementing WCA in 2019. April 2020 5-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx 5.0 Transportation 5.1 BACKGROUND The 2014 Feasibility Study had extensive analysis involving the CR 10/50 intersection, two development entrances, a County “Turnback” potential which would enable the City to manage CR 10 as a local road, constructing a new CR 10 and moving along a different route (Meister Road), etc. The reader is referred to the 2014 Planning Commission and Council packets for more detail. 5.2 MAIN ENTRANCE AT CR 10 Since 2014, the County has modified the “10/50” intersection and a Turnback is not of interest to the City, therefore regarding this 2020 development the early feedback from the County (non-binding) suggest that the main requirement for this 2020 concept plan are turn lanes at the development’s main entrance. Design will include a pedestrian crossing to the City Park and widening for a bike lane on CR 10, constructed as part of Turn Lanes however, formal designation will be delayed until a speed limit redetermination occurs. 5.3 CITY STREET STUBS City street stubs are shown on Figure 1 and typical of City policy is to require adjacent parcels be provided public access. The connections can be described as follows: Northeast – Provide easement and grading for public safety and utility access to CR 116 that is aligned with the future City parcel development on the east. o Note: ROW to Lift Station area and northeast access to CR 116 may be required with Phase 1 of the development Southeast—stub to align with future City road at CR 116 on south end of City parcel. West – stub providing access to existing farmstead which will continue west along CR 10 as frontage road. Ghost platting the west two parcels and north parcels may be necessary prior to final alignment decision. 5.4 FINDINGS The 2020 development concept transportation improvements are preliminarily described as follows: Turn lanes at main entrance via a project that is managed designed, and constructed by City through a developer escrow. Street stubs to west parcel, east to CR 116 and northeast to CR 116. o Easement/property requirements for the northeast access will be determined as process moves forward. o Northeast ROW can be presumed to be 80 feet and extend into the lift station area so lot adjustments (reductions) may be required. It can be noted that these improvements may be modified as City process or County approval is formalized. April 2020 6-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx 6.0 Financing 6.1 SUMMARY Financing options of the development necessary for infrastructure and to mitigate impacts typically follow the approach of: On-site infrastructure is managed by the developer Upsizing of on-site trunk utilities are provided credit, with eligibility determined during the approval process and availability of credits. 2020 trunk sewer and water fees (TLAC) will apply. Off-site projects are typically managed by the City (engineering, bidding and construction management) through an escrow Final lot count may be adjusted (reduced) based on further engineering analysis that shows conflicts with the concept plan and/or the 2014 engineering plans. The financial package will be further detailed and negotiated as the project moves forward and culminates in the overall Developer Agreement with the overall preliminary plat approval which is updated for each phase of the development. April 2020 7-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The following infrastructure improvements are feasible and necessary to manage the development. These improvements are consistent with similar requirements for other developments in Corcoran, and have shown to be necessary for managing the additional population. Overall This feasibility study was based on a 2020 concept with 2014 engineering plans submitted for this application and will need a significant amount of modification regarding stormwater management, pipe sizes, adjacent property stubs, pipe inverts, overall lot count, and street alignments are some of the items that will be reviewed in more detail as the project moves through the approval process. The 2020 Sawgrass concept was analyzed as a stand-alone project, and if other development applications move forward the findings here will be revisited. Nearby developments would appear to benefit the Sawgrass parcel with sharing of offsite utilities . Sewer Moving the lift station (at developer cost) is required for service of the development and consistency with the Master Trunk Sewer Plan. o The City will coordinate with applicant the timing of the ROW dedication within the development for the utilities to the new lift station and also offsite easements. ROW and easement dedication may be required in a phase prior to Sawgrass planned construction. o Current layout (2014 plan set) appears to have home lots within the required lift station area. o The lift station location also shows road impacts and is the main stormwater discharge location therefore will require additional detailed analysis and significant modifications to the 2014 plans. Forcemain route is internal to the development and will connect to the existing 6- inch forcemain near the southeast portion of the development. Construction of trunk lines to development’s boundaries as directed by the City for the west, east and south property boundaries. Water Trunk water main is shown along CR 116, however an alternate route may be located through the development based on development timing and City discretion. Under the CR 116 scenario, developer responsible for all costs to pull laterals from CR 116. Internal to the development, any upsize costs are credited against the TLAC fee. Stubs to the south, west and east property boundaries are required. Offsite water main work is typically a City-managed project and constructed through escrow process. April 2020 7-1 T:\2294-Corcoran\56 Sawgrass\Feasibility Study Draft April 2020\Report Text for Packet.docx Water Resources The Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission’s development rules and standards will apply. Stormwater improvements would also need to meet the goals of Corcoran’s Local Plan and the Elm Creek TMDL study. o To move towards meeting load reduction goals, the City’s Local Surface Water Plan identifies that improvements to water resources will occur with development. o Large developments are participating financially in water resource projects to meet City’s obligations under land use changes. o Modeling of the development drainage, potential drainage improvements, and floodplain may be needed to refine the project scope. o The main discharge point is a main infrastructure area with road, lift station and stormwater and will require additional detailed study and landowner engagement. Corcoran has stormwater guidelines for hydrology and hydraulics to consistently manage stormwater events in new developments. These may affect the 2014 stormwater management system. Downstream identification/mitigation of additional volume will involve the City reengaging the adjacent landowners and WMO. Floodplain is defined in the area and FEMA data needs to be verified. Transportation Turn lanes at main entrance via a project managed designed, and constructed through public bid process will be implemented with developer escrow. Street stubs to west parcel, east to CR 116 and northeast to CR 116. May be required with Phase 1. o Easement/property requirements for the northeast access will be determined as process moves forward. o Northeast ROW can be presumed to be 80 feet and extend into the lift station area so lot adjustments (reductions) may be required. Design will include a pedestrian crossing to the City Park and widening for a bike lane on CR 10, constructed as part of Turn Lanes however, formal designation will be delayed until a speed limit redetermination occurs. It can be noted that these improvements may be modified as County approval is formalized. Figures 1 Utility and Road Alignments 2 Floodplain «LS «LS SHIFT ROAD TO ALIGN TO CITY PROPERTY PROPOSED ROAD SHIFT ROAD TO ALIGN TO CITY PROPERTY PROPOSED ROAD SHIFT ROAD TO ALIGN TO CITY PROPERTY PROPOSED ROAD CITY PROPERTY 16'' TRUNK WATER 8'' CONNECTION 12'' W/M STUBBED TO WEST Protect Trees Protect Trees EXISTING LIFT STATION PROPOSED LIFT STATION MAIN STORMWATER DISCHARGE CROSSING AND CITY ROAD ALIGNMENT REQUIRES DETAILED ANALYSIS 18'' SEWER STUBBED TO WEST 8'' W/M WATER QUALITY LOOP UNLESS INDICATED STREETS WILL HAVE 8'' WATERMAIN AND SEWER SEWER STUB FOR CITY PROPERTY CONNECTION Sout h F or k RushCr e e k CountyDit ch N u m b e r Si x te e n SouthForkRush Creek S o uthForkRus h C r ee k 8''8''8''12' '16''12'' 8''18''24''15''18''18''18''18''8'' 6'' 4'' 8'' 12'' 456750 456710 4567116 CSAH 10CSAH 50CSAH 1 0 CR-1169 3 8942 938937941936940939936937.9936.1942.4937.2936. 1940.7937.5BTBQBVB R BPBUBSAE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE CountyDit c h N u mber Si xteenSouthForkRushCreek Path: L:\2294\0056\Pro\Sawgrass\Sawgrass.aprx 4/10/2020 1:43 PM ShuJC0243 Layout: Drainage Map Figure 2 APR 2020 Drainage Map CITY OF CORCORAN 500 0 500250 Feet ¯ Legend Parcels Streams Regulated Floodway AE 100 Year Flood Hazard 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Cross Sections Base Flood Elevations Sawgrass Proposed Roads City Proposed Road Appendix A 2014 Engineer Memorandum c:\users\torkc0063\documents\corcoran offsite\2_development projects\2_schendel\plan reviews\pud review memo\pud engineer's memo to planning commission.docx ENGINEER’S MEMORANDUM TO: Kendra Lindahl, City Planner FROM: Kent Torve, P.E. City Engineer DATE: November 24, 2014 SUBJECT: Sawgrass PUD Review This memorandum presents engineer’s review results for the development application for Sawgrass dated October 9th, 2014. Wenck and Stantec have been working cooperatively on changes to the plan in the last month. Additional changes will occur as more detailed drawings are provided through the construction plan approval process. 1.0 GENERAL · Infrastructure is consistent with the three Feasibility Studies (attached) and will be implemented with some modifications. o See Attachment A for the feasibility studies on Transportation, Stormwater, and Sewer and Water. · Upon approval, the developer and City are moving forward on improvements including: o Realignment of CR 10 and CR 50 intersection as shown in Attachment B. This is a modified version of the selected option from the Feasibility Study (Option B2). o Offsite sewer force main and water main along east side of CR 116. The Feasibility study shows along the west side, however City property on the east side is preferred route to save easement costs. o Stormwater conveyance north of site as shown in Attachment C. · Wetland approvals are still pending with ACOE, BWSR, and the Watershed. The City is not the responsible agency for wetland approvals, however will review approvals and attend Technical Evaluation Panels as needed. Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 (800) 472-2232 (763) 479-4200 Fax (763) 479-4242 wenckmp@wenck.com www.wenck.com Kendra Lindahl, City Planner Sawgrass PUD Review November 24, 2014 2 C:\Users\TorKC0063\Documents\Corcoran Offsite\2_Development Projects\2_Schendel\Plan Reviews\PUD Review Memo\PUD Engineer's Memo to Planning Commission.docx 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND FINANCING Engineering staff is recommending approval of the engineering items for the PUD plan submittal. The applicant has a good working relationship with staff, and modifications will continue to be made as the project moves forward. Recommendations include: 2.1 Water and Sewer Water and sewer trunk lines and lift station will be installed consistent with the City’s Master Plans. · On site utilities and lift station are constructed by developer · Offsite utilities are designed and constructed on easements negotiated by City and funded by Developer through an escrow. · Adjacent properties (west, north and east) will need to be provided access to sewer and water. 2.2 Transportation 10/50 Intersection · Improvements will be made at the CR 10/50 intersection mostly within the ROW. o Funded with cost participation by the developer, which could range up to 100%. Turn Lanes at Entrance · Turn lanes are required at the development entrance. o Designed and constructed by City, funded by Developer through an escrow. · Design will include a pedestrian crossing to the City Park and widening for a bike lane on CR 10. o Constructed as part of Turn Lanes o However, formal designation will be delayed until a 30 mph zone, (see Section 3.0) Turn Lanes at West Entrance · County will provide plat review prior to Planning Commission meeting, one item that may be required is turn lanes for the west entrance. The design, financing and construction process would be similar to the main entrance (with no ped crossing). North Access · A “road stub” to the north properties will be planned during the construction plan phase. This will not impact current development layout since the road nearly abuts these properties as shown on the preliminary plat. CR 116 Connection · The utility easement from the Lift Station area to CR 116 may be graded and graveled as, however final design will occur parallel with easement negotiations. Kendra Lindahl, City Planner Sawgrass PUD Review November 24, 2014 3 C:\Users\TorKC0063\Documents\Corcoran Offsite\2_Development Projects\2_Schendel\Plan Reviews\PUD Review Memo\PUD Engineer's Memo to Planning Commission.docx · Developer is not being required to participate in funding the ultimate build out of CR 116 intersection beyond the gravel, grading and easement necessary for Sawgrass. On Site · Cul de sacs and turnarounds are to be installed per diagram shown in Attachment D. · The City may delay acceptance of selected streets if significant construction traffic will utilize these streets over several years. This will be discussed during the Phasing Plan with developer. 2.3 Stormwater · Emergency Overflows will be required · Offsite stormwater improvements to the north will be constructed by the City with developer cost participation. It is assumed the offsite landowners contribute easements. 3.0 TRANSPORTATION 3.1 CR 10 – 50 Intersection The County has reviewed the City’s preferred option (B2) and also produced other alternatives for consideration. As a result, the County has (tentatively) offered design services and some construction services for realignment of the CR 10/50 intersection. The revised design includes “T” of CR 50 into CR 10 (rather than CR 10 “T” into CR 50). The benefit is the dominant traffic pattern (northwest P.M and southeast A.M on CR 10) is maintained. The negative is the impact to the 10-50 Club which will have a portion of the parking lot acquired by the City for the project. Early discussions with the County include having the City responsible for concrete curbing, ROW acquisition, and property owner coordination. The alignment is shown in Attachment B and future needs include a turn signal and cost participation by the developer will be required. On Road Bike Lane The County would support widening of the stretch between the 10/50 intersection and the development entrance for a bike lane. This will be incorporated into the design and construction. 3.2 Turn Lanes Turn lanes and bypass lane are required and will be constructed by the City and paid by the developer. Pedestrian Crossing to City Park A pedestrian crossing from the development to the City Park will be designed and constructed, but to be formally implemented is dependent on the speed limit being Kendra Lindahl, City Planner Sawgrass PUD Review November 24, 2014 4 C:\Users\TorKC0063\Documents\Corcoran Offsite\2_Development Projects\2_Schendel\Plan Reviews\PUD Review Memo\PUD Engineer's Memo to Planning Commission.docx lowered from its current level of 50 mph. The residential development would make it likely for a lower speed limit to be posted (as determined by MnDOT), since the speed limit determination is done under “existing conditions”. Therefore, the City will pursue this crossing after houses are built. West Entrance County will provide plat review prior to Planning Commission meeting, one item that may be required is turn lanes for the west entrance. The design, financing and construction process would be similar to the main entrance (with no ped crossing). 3.3 CR 116 Future Intersection Since it is necessary for utilities to be placed in a corridor towards CR 116 along the north edge of Sawgrass, a preliminary road design will be created to calculate the necessary slopes and side slope embankments. Grading for partial width and gravel placement could also be required based on easement negotiations and Commission and Council input. North Access The properties to the north of Sawgrass will eventually develop and utilize the CR 116 access. This will be a challenging area to layout due to the floodplain and wetlands involved, however a “road stub” to the north properties will be planned during the Sawgrass construction plan phase. This will not impact current development layout since the road nearly abuts these properties as shown on the preliminary plat. 4.0 SEWER 4.1 Trunk System The City’s Master Plan (as shown in the Feasibility Study in Attachment A) shows a major trunk line through the site, extending to a Lift Station near City Hall and CR 116. It is proposed that the Lift Station be installed “temporarily” at the north end of the development, and upon further development to the north this would be abandoned. One modification to the Trunk System is the 21-inch pipe as shown goes through a high spot of the development and is infeasible to reconstruct in future years. Pipes at 40 feet depth can be constructed initially, however upon the need for replacement are too deep with existing houses along city streets. Therefore the trunk line was “split” into two trunk lines, an easterly 18-inch and a westerly 12- inch. The easterly 18-inch will terminate on the north side of CR 10, and the City’s Downtown project or future development will require connecting through the City Park at Meister Field. Kendra Lindahl, City Planner Sawgrass PUD Review November 24, 2014 5 C:\Users\TorKC0063\Documents\Corcoran Offsite\2_Development Projects\2_Schendel\Plan Reviews\PUD Review Memo\PUD Engineer's Memo to Planning Commission.docx The westerly 12-inch will terminate on the north side of CR 10 ROW, and in the future the construction of a school or greenspace development west of Corcoran Trail will require a trunk line connection under CR 10. Alignment, sizing (possibly be 15-inch) and slope will be finalized during construction plan phase. Additional slope will be needed to allow future reconstruction by boring, since the side yard easements will prohibit open cut replacement of this line. Lift Station The lift station will be installed with similar standards and characteristics of the Lions Park lift station that is currently under construction. A dedicated generator will be at the lift station. Jacking under CR 10 Note: The city could participate in the bidding of Sawgrass sewer to obtain a price on jacking under CR 10 at both locations and decide at later date to participate with City funds if any cost savings are realized. This appears more feasible for the easterly 18-inch due to the Downtown project than the westerly 15-inch for a potential school. 4.2 Adjacent Properties Adjacent properties (west, north and east) will need to be provided access to sewer. Typically this involves a manhole at the property line and these will be located during the construction drawing review phase. 5.0 WATER 5.1 Trunk System The City’s Master Plan (as shown in the Feasibility Study in Attachment A) shows trunk water main extended through the site. This has been modified to a line along the east will be an 8- inch looping the future Downtown and developable land south of CR 50. A 12-inch will connect west of the Gleason property to carry trunk services to the west boundary. The full build out of Sawgrass and Lennar will have the City about one third of the way towards needing “storage” via the construction of a water tower. Significant lengths of trunk lines will have been installed exposing large areas of greenspace to development. 5.2 Adjacent Properties Adjacent properties (west, north and east) will need to be provided access to water. Typically this involves a valve and hydrant at the property line and these will be located during the construction drawing review phase. Kendra Lindahl, City Planner Sawgrass PUD Review November 24, 2014 6 C:\Users\TorKC0063\Documents\Corcoran Offsite\2_Development Projects\2_Schendel\Plan Reviews\PUD Review Memo\PUD Engineer's Memo to Planning Commission.docx 6.0 STORMWATER Offsite Staff has met with residents to the north of Sawgrass to discuss stormwater conveyance to the creek. As noted in the Feasibility Study, the area to the north has significant floodplain, and the floodplain will not be modified due to impacts of this project. Historical City stormwater maps had shown a northwest ditch route for the site’s easterly wetland. The 1971 aerial photo is given in Attachment C, however current topography shows this route is no longer feasible. The changes to the landscape from houses / tree canopy / farming practices over the last 40 years has created a situation where a northerly flow path is more dominant in the current condition. To mitigate the impact of more volume of runoff, the City has been in contact with the residents to the north who have expressed a willingness to participate in a solution so the development’s outlet of the large Sawgrass wetland does not exacerbate existing conditions. Therefore, the City will work with the residents and developer to implement a conveyance solution similar to one of the routes shown in Attachment C. Elm Creek Watershed will be reviewing plans and as the LGU also should issue wetland permits that will be pursued under a “No Loss”. Financing will be at the developer cost, and implementing an offsite solution assumes the northerly landowners continue to cooperate. Onsite Modeling The City has required the developer’s model increase the volume of runoff due to impervious associated with housing development. Engineering hydrology manuals can be subject to interpretation where cropped or agricultural practices and development can be shown as producing similar runoff. However, for Corcoran, Wenck requires that the soil “Curve Numbers” be raised to reflect less pervious (infiltrating) soils due to mass grading, sod, and impervious construction. The result is a an increase in high water levels (HWLS) and during the plan review process require some grading changes for low floors. Onsite Water Quality The developer will be required to construct filtration systems along the pond “shelf” to further treat stormwater. Street Drainage Individual street drainage will be reviewed during construction plan review. Appendix B Sewer System Trunk Plan SE District !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H #* Lift Station 2 and Existing Forcemain will not be needed in Proposed Condition City of Maple GroveCity of Medina MorinLake GooseLake County Road 116Horseshoe Trl BridlePathAbilene Ln Homestead Trl C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 County Road 50 GleasonPkwyWillow DrHunterRdCorcoranTrlWMaple Hill RdCorcoranTrlEMohawk DrTrail Haven RdLarkin RdCain RdO l d Set t l er s RdKalk RdMeister Rd Schutte Pl Strehler RdBlue Bonnet DrS outh ForkR u s h C r e e k SE-A SE-A SE-O SE-AO SE-AP SE-AQ SE-AT SE-ASSE-AR SE-D SE-K SE-M SE-C SE-I SE-H SE-B SE-F SE-E SE-G SE-N SE-T SE-L SE-S SE-J SE-R SE-Q SE-P SE-AM SE-V SE-ZSE-Y SE-U SE-X SE-W SE-AESE-AJ SE-AC SE-AB SE-AD SE-AASE-AK SE-AU SE-AV SE-AISE-AHSE-AG SE-AF SE-18 SE-36 (LS) SE-37 SE-1 SE-2 SE-3 SE-4 SE-5 SE-6 SE-7SE-8 SE-9 SE-10 SE-11 SE-12 SE-13 SE-14 SE-15 SE-16 SE-17 SE-19 SE-20 SE-21 SE-22SE-23 SE-24 SE-25 SE-26 SE-27 SE-28 SE-29 SE-30 SE-31 SE-32 SE-33 SE-34 (LS) Elm Creek Interceptor SE-35 MCES Lift Station 8'' 1 2 ' ' 15'' 6''18''8''18''8''1 2 ' ' 8''15''8''15' '10''15"6''8''15"10'' 18''18''15''30''15''18''12"10''12''1 5 ' '10''8''12''(10''Eq)30''15''12''15"15''10'' 18'' 1 2 ' ' 8'' 456710 456750 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,800 0 1,800900 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\SE Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:32:33 PM User: ShuJC0243!Existing Gravity !Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral) Existing Forcemain Proposed Forcemain Existing MCES Forcemain(Interim Size Shown) #*MCES Lift Station !H Sewer Node (LS) = Lift Station Sewer Subdistricts Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Map 7-3Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - SE District Appendix C Water System Trunk Plan !O !O !O #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake 456710 R u s h CreekRushCreek South F o rk R u sh Creek SouthForkRu shC reek2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Trunk Water System.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:36:40 PM User: ShuJC0243 Existing Watermain Proposed Watermain !O Potential Water Tower Locations #*Existing Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #*Proposed Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #* Emergency Connection withNeighboring Communities(Normally Closed) #*Potential Water Storage #*Potential Booster Station Potential Future Well Exploration Areas Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Map 9-2Trunk Water System Appendix D Stormwater Modeling Guidelines Stormwater Guidelines for Development March 2019 Issue Cities changing from rural to urban development are challenged by the additional stormwater generated due to construction of impervious surfaces, along with the offsite infrastructure, or lack thereof, to manage effectively. To standardize the modeling and review process, the guidelines below were created for efficiency. Note: A watershed approval is required per Elm Creek WMO rules, which also reviews flow rates, water quality and volume management. Modeling Watershed Information Provide an aerial photo of the development that includes the overall watershed and subwatershed boundaries Provide a summary of the acreage to each discharge point leaving the site. Any increase (or decrease) shall be identified. Show any floodplain adjacent to project or within the project Show downstream water bodies and flow paths o Downstream flow paths and water bodies typically need to have elevations, inverts, and condition identified. Subwatersheds A HydroCAD model (typically used) has inputs that can vary by user. To minimize resubmittals, review time and effort, the following data shall be utilized. Electronic model shall be submitted Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) shall be lowered one category due to the mass grading and compaction of the soils. For example, an existing B soil, shall be modeled as a proposed C soil (unless it remains undisturbed) Wetlands, filtration basins, and ponds shall be modeled at CN of 98 Identify peak rates for storm events and proposed shall be equal or less than existing rates. o Note: There are certain conditions where at City’s discretion the off-site conditions require a reduction in flow rate from existing rates. SWMM (i.e. EPA-, XP-, or PC-) models can be submitted for review, however these increase review time. Model Setup for Outlet Control Structures, NWLs and Infiltration The model’s flow control structures (OCS, culverts, etc.) shall match the construction plan information. During the plan and model review both may be modified and revised Individual detail plates are required for each OCS, and individual plates shall have inverts identified A pond or wetland NWL (and model starting elevation) shall be set at the constructed outlet control elevation. o No live storage shall be utilized below the controlling OCS elevation. o No live storage shall be used for filtration shelves on ponds below controlling OCS elevation 2 T:\2294-Corcoran\33-Pulte Homes\Stormwater Modeling Guidelines for Development.docx If a pond or wetland has an NWL (wet surface), infiltration shall not be used in flood routing. If a pond has filtration BMP causing drawdown below the NWL, this drawdown elevation shall not be used as the NWL for flood routing. (Filtration has a slower release time and during wet periods is not available as live storage). Construction Plans Catch Basins Street drainage shall be sufficient to manage the 10-year event Typical a CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly Three inches (0.25 feet) of head on a CB will inundate a street centerline (2% slope). Spacing is 200 to 250 feet using longitudinal street dimensions of 40 feet from road centerline to half the house footprint (assumes rear half of house drains to rear yard). Dimensions equal 10,000 SF. CBs may be required on both sides of ped ramps to capture flows Natural Drainage Features Waterbodies receiving urban drainage (wetlands, ditches, gullies) may need to have OCS installed, erosion protection, or reduced flow rates to allow the feature to function over the long term due to more consistent flows from increased impervious via development Offsite work may be necessary and City will assist with coordination, easements, etc. HWLs and EOFs The freeboard requirements are: o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the HWL o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the EOF EOFs shall be accurately shown and as builts are required. The highest point shall be the EOF (for example top of curb) since this is the controlling elevation o In certain instances, channel calculations of the swale may be required to show the EOF has capacity to manage estimated flow Overland EOFs are preferred, however if a second pipe serves as an EOF then modeling will include a 100-year event using the second pipe (EOF) as the only outlet (primary outlet plugged). Rear Yards Rear yards or swales less than 2% shall have draintile. Typically, every two to three lots will require rear yard CBs. Sump Connections Houses adjoining a wetland or pond do not need individual sump connection Others will have access to rear yard stormsewer. Offsite Impacts Adjacent Parcels City will review adjacent parcels (downstream and upstream) for impacts from volume, point discharge, etc. and may require off site improvements. City will assist in coordination of any off site work. Off site water quality improvement projects may be determined by the City for assistance with compliance with City’s TMDL approach of implementing improvements upon development. FEMA modifications may be necessary due to development and implemented by City. Appendix E North Access Road Layout 0+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+007+3255.6' 13.9' 22' 71.1' 91.2'INSTALL RETAINING WALL ±5' FROM EXISTING STRUCTUREINSTALL RETAINING WALL ±5'FROM EXISTING DRIVEWAY33.1'GRADING TO REMAIN 5' (MIN)FROM EXISTING STRUCTURESGRADING TO REMAIN 5' (MIN)FROM EXISTING STRUCTURESPROPOSED PERMANENTEASEMENTPROPOSED PERMANENTEASEMENTPROPOSED PERMANENTEASEMENTPROPOSED PERMANENTEASEMENTSawgrass North Connection PROFILE9359409459509559609659709359409459509559609659700+00EG:957.94 FG:957.941+00EG:955.92 FG:955.922+00EG:955.55 FG:955.553+00EG:953.79 FG:953.794+00EG:950.39 FG:950.395+00EG:955.51FG:955.516+00EG:957.06FG:957.067+00EG:946.96FG:946.968+00EG:FG:-2.33%-0.81%GB:0+00.00957.940 GB:7+31.60947.138 HIGH PT STA: 3+61.52HIGH PT ELEV: 955.00PVI STA:4+11.35PVI ELEV:954.59K:65.78LVC:99.65BVC:3+61.52955.00 EVC:4+61.17953.43 Toll Free: 800-472-2232 Email: wenckmp@wenck.com Web: wenck.com 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 8b. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 16, 2020 for the April 23, 2020 City Council Meeting RE: Sketch Plan for “Eagle Brook Church” located at the NW quadrant of Hackamore Road and County Road 101 (city file 20-013) REVIEW DEADLINE: May 26, 2020 1.Description of Request The applicants are requesting an opportunity to appear before the City Council to solicit informal comments on a sketch plan for a proposed place of worship. The facility is planned as a 70,000 sq. ft. single story structure with 1,500 seats in the worship auditorium, a lobby with cafe, an administrative area for approximately ten staff and a children’s ministry classroom area for weekend kid’s programming use. 2.Background The site is made up of five lots with PID numbers 36-119-23-44-0008, 36-119-23-44-0009, 36-119-23- 44-0010, 36-119-23-44-0013 and 36-119-23-44-0014. Each lot has a single family residential structure on it and four of them contain accessory structures. 3.Context Zoning and Land Use The site is guided Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned RSF-2 (Single Family Residential 2). Places of Worship/Assembly (such as churches) are a conditional use in residential districts. Surrounding Properties The property to the north and west and zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development), is guided for Low Density Residential and is part of the Ravinia development. The properties to the south and east are outside the City of Corcoran and part of the cities of Medina and Maple Grove, respectively. Natural Characteristics of the Site There are natural plant communities on the site identified as Wet Prairie on the Natural Resource Inventory Areas Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Further, multiple wetlands are shown on Hennepin County’s Natural Resources mapping software as shown on the Site Location map. Eagle Brook Church Sketch Plan (20-013) 2 April 23, 2020 4. ANALYSIS: Sketch Plan The sketch plan process provides an opportunity for the applicant to get information from the City that can be incorporated into a formal development application. The next steps would be: 1. Application for Preliminary Plat, Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit 2. Application for Final Plat (and development contract) The plans show the NW corner of the site as undeveloped and separated from the church by the required street connection. The plan application must include a ghost plat or concept plan for that portion of the site. Lot Standards The sketch plan appears to show compliance with the RSF-2 standards, which require the following minimum standards: Minimum Lot Area 11,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot width 80 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet Front, From all other streets 20 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 15 feet Side (living) 10 feet Side (garage)** 5 feet Rear 30 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet *Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. **Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 feet. Design Guidelines/Architecture The property is located in the Southeast District of the City and subject to the design standards in Appendix B and the building standards in Section 1050.060 of the Zoning Ordinance. Architectural concept elevations were submitted and the applicant indicates that the building would be a mix of architectural precast concrete, architectural metal panels and glass. The building articulation would help break up the mass of the building and a tall cross tower will added. Transition from Residential The building is located in the center of the site, which will provide a buffer from adjacent residential. However, staff notes that the parking on west is only 30 feet from the lot line and the drive aisle appears Eagle Brook Church Sketch Plan (20-013) 3 April 23, 2020 to be less than 15 feet from the lot line. A thoughtful landscape plan will be required to screen the vehicle headlights from the adjacent residential properties. Parking lot lighting is not shown, but must comply with the requirements in the ordinance to limit the impacts on adjacent residential. Parking The plan shows 850 parking stalls for this 1,500 seat facility. The code requires the following “each 18 inches of such seating facilities shall be counted as one seat for the purpose of determining parking requirements” but also states “One space for every 4 seats, based on the design capacity of the facility”. Additional information will be required to determine compliance but it is staff’s estimate that the proposed parking exceeds the minimum requirements. The codes states that “The furthest space of an off-site parking lot for non-residential uses shall not be located more than 300 feet (excluding public rights-of-way) from the main entrance of the principal use being served.” It appears that some of the parking stalls may exceed this standard. Landscaping Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance lists the landscaping requirements. As noted earlier, in addition to the minimum standards in the ordinance, screening from adjacent residential properties must be provided. Signage No signage is shown on the plans. The ordinance allows one 32 sq. ft. sign up to 6 feet high for non- residential uses in the RSF-2 district. No wall signage is allowed. Sidewalks and Trails Pedestrian connections should be provided within the site. The new public street that will connect Larkspur to Lupine will include a sidewalk on one side of the street. New public trails are planned on CR 101 and Hackamore Road within the right-of-way. Each of those trails will be constructed when the associated street is reconstructed. Transportation/Access The City Engineer is completing a feasibility study to address all infrastructure needs. A preliminary memo is included with this packet. The public street connecting Lupine and Larkspur must be completed with this project. The Ravinia development anticipated the extension of Goldenrod Lane through this site. This connection will be reevaluated with a formal submittal. Public Safety reviewed the sketch plan and noted that this Eagle Brook Church Sketch Plan (20-013) 4 April 23, 2020 should be an emergency vehicle access if a full connection is not provided. There is another temporary turnaround in Ravinia 11th that will be further examined for a possible connection as this project proceeds. The Hackamore Road street improvements are currently being designed in partnership with the City of Medina. The applicant is proposing two accesses onto Hackamore Road (one entrance/one exit) and one new access onto CR 101. The City is reviewing the Hackamore accesses as part of the feasibility study and the County will determine the viability of the CR 101 access. Utilities Utilities can be extended through the site from the adjacent Ravinia developments. More detail is provided in the attached engineer’s memo. Ponding Stormwater ponding can be provided on site in compliance with local and state requirements. Wetlands There are a number of wetlands on site. The applicant must submit a wetland delineation for review and approval by the City as the LGU for the WCA. If wetland impacts are proposed additional applications for mitigation would be required. The applicant must comply with the wetland buffer and setback requirements in Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. Summary The proposal appears to comply with or have the ability to comply with ordinance requirements. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss the sketch plan and provide the applicant with informal comments. Any opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the City Council are considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. Eagle Brook Church Sketch Plan (20-013) 5 April 23, 2020 Attachments 1. Site Location Map 2. City Engineer’s Memo 3. Applicant Narrative 4. Site Graphics 5. Official Zoning Map 6. 2040 Future Land Use 7. Parks and Trails Plan 8. Natural Resource Inventory 9. Wetland Locations and Classifications Hennepin County Natural Resources Map Date: 4/14/2020 Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2020 1 inch = 400 feet Legend FEMA Floodplains - 100 Year A AE FLOODPLAIN AH AO AE FLOODWAY Wetlands Potential Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - NWI PID: 3611923440008 Address: 6301 CO RD NO 101, CORCORAN Owner Name: JTC LLC ET AL Acres: 5.2 ¯ Engineer’s Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - To: Kendra Lindahl, City Planner From: Kent Torve, P.E. Date: April 13, 2020 Subject: Eagle Brook Church Concept Plan Review 0.0 Infrastructure Setting Eagle Brook Church is proposing to construct a church located on Hackamore Road and CR 101 in southeast Corcoran. The area is currently large lot residential and had previously been ghost platted so the change in use is under review for infrastructure impacts and needs related to traffic, sewer, water supply, drainage and stormwater. A final Feasibility Study is in progress, however this memo provides initial overview related to the concept plan. Figure 1 outlines the initial infrastructure review items. 1.0 Transportation 1.1 County Road 101 Hennepin County controls the location and design requirements for new access to CSAH 101 through a permit process. The feasibility study for the City will review the following: • (In progress) Detailed traffic forecasts using information obtained from Eagle Brook staff. These forecasts will be used to analyze intersection operations at CSAH 101/Hackamore, CR 116/Hackamore, and the proposed Hackamore access locations. The forecasts take into account the expected attendance at each service, the number of trips generated by each service and other activities that occur on the campus, and existing and future background traffic on each roadway. • The traffic analyses will estimate the impact of the development on the surrounding roadways and intersections. If operational issues occur, candidate mitigation measures will be developed. • County trail is planned in a corridor along west side of CR 101. 1.2 Hackamore Road Corcoran and Medina are in the early stages of design for Hackamore Road which will result in a two-city agreement on phasing, cost share and improvements. This concept plan has been shared with Medina along with older traffic data, wetlands and surveying and further coordination will occur throughout the design and coordination process. Analysis using background traffic is unavailable due to COVID 19 however Medina provided the latest raw data collected for the Hackamore design project. • The church is showing two entrances along Hackamore Road and one-way traffic flow (entrance at the middle of site and exit along the west property boundary. • The analyses will determine if the proposed access locations are adequate from a spacing and operations standpoint. • Trail is planned along the north side of Hackamore Road and design is underway. 2 1.3 Internal Street Connection “North Loop” Connecting streets for the north portion of the site will be necessary to connect Lupine Lane (Ravinia 5th) to Larkspur Lane in Ravinia 11th. Residential access to the church, or a restricted access from the parking areas to the residential streets along with sidewalk connections will be evaluated as the Feasibility Study continues. 1.4 Temporary Turnarounds Temporary turnarounds were installed with the phases of Ravinia and each location will be reviewed for a full street or trail/emergency connection for public safety or access. Four street stubs exist in Ravinia, two will be connected with the “North Loop” road and two will be analyzed for public safety and utility connections. Findings A more detailed traffic impact study is underway but for concept review the following are initial findings: • County approval is required for the CR 101 access • Traffic impact study is underway with data provided by Eagle Brook Church • Project will participate in Hackamore project with funds, stormwater management, ROW dedication, trail easement, etc. 2.0 Sewer Service The church can be serviced by the laterals installed with Ravinia as follows: • For “slab on grade” (no basement) construction either Goldenrod (970.5) or Ravinia 11th (979.25) • For a structure with a basement the Goldenrod stub would be utilized. Additional information is needed for the land north of the “North Loop” which may also require sewer service. Finding For this concept plan review the determination is made that the site is serviceable by gravity. 3.0 Water Service The parcel has laterals available from Ravinia and the existing water model was executed for pressure and fire flow. Corcoran will eventually have a tower and booster station so the analysis was provided for both (No Tower and With Tower). Secondly, it is assumed the 2020 Trunk Water Main is installed and operating along CR 116 west of Ravinia which provides “looping” for the SE corner of Corcoran. Potential Upsize of Water Main Since the proposed land use changed and fire flows are above residential needs, the model was executed for 1) connecting to the existing 8-inch stubs and a second analysis 2) investigating the benefit achieved by increasing water main size to 12 inch. This would require replacing new 8-inch in Ravinia streets with 12-inch diameter pipe further back into the Ravinia system. 3 Model Results No Tower No Tower Future With Tower Water Main 8” loop 12” loop 8” loop Fire Flow 1,700 GPM 1,700 GPM 2,900 GPM Pressure 44 PSI 44 PSI 69 PSI Findings • Analysis shows that the upsizing to 12-inch (and reconstructing new infrastructure) does not provide additional benefit. • Looping will be required between Lupine and Larspur and looping for the remaining two stubs will be at City discretion and determined during approval process. 4.0 Stormwater Stormwater is manageable for the site and will be subject to wetland regulations and Elm Creek Watershed approval. • Site drainage is to the southeast and it can be estimated from other developments in the west metro with heavy soils that 3% to 5% of the buildable parcel area would be utilized for stormwater management (outside wetland boundaries). This site has elevation “drop” which will allow for higher pond elevations and result in the lower end of the range (3% of buildable area) for the pond footprints. • Drainage to southeast enters a culvert under Hackamore Road, then is channeled back under Hackamore Road from Medina near CR 101. • FEMA LOMR (Letter of Map Revision) process is being conducted for Ravinia drainage to the west, therefore floodplain elevation may be established with that process. • One unique site feature is a heavy duty plastic weir for a pond that drains onto the property. The weir was reviewed during Ravinia 11th EOF review and determined that access for improvements would occur during redevelopment of the residential property. Therefore the City will coordinate the replacement with this project with Lennar and Eagle Brook. Findings The stormwater shown on the concept plan will be modified during design and approval process. • City stormwater guidelines will be utilized (see Attachment) that cover flood modeling and drainage items. • Plastic weir on the north edge is required to be replaced as directed by City. • An emergency overflow or diversion culvert conveying stormwater under main entrance may be required to protect Hackamore Road during extreme events. 4 • Coordination with Hackamore project will be required, this site may provide combined benefit for treatment, wetlands or enhanced water quality project. • FEMA LOMR process is underway and may include Eagle Brook drainageway. 5.0 Wetlands Significant wetlands exist and the formal process will need to be followed. It can be noted that Corcoran is the LGU for the Wetland Conservation Act and obtained this authority in 2019. 5 Figure SINGLE STORY 70,000 SF 1,500 SEATS WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA 340 CARS 200 CARS310 CARS GOLDENROD TRAFFIC OR EMERGENCY ACCESS MAY BE REQUIRED RAVINIA 11TH TURNAROUD, STORMWATER EOF AND UTILITY COORDINATION WITH LENNAR IS NECESSARY. SEWER INVERT 979.25 AT LARKSPUR IS FEASIBLE FOR AT GRADE CONSTRUCTION. CONNECT TO 8'' WATERMAIN IN LARKSPUR SEWER INVERT IN LUPINE 994.3, NOT FEASIBLE FOR CHURCH SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION. SEWER INVERT IN GOLDENROD 970.5, IS FEASIBLE FOR CONNECTION. 8'' WATER FROM GOLDENROD MAY LOOP TO LUPINE 8'' WATER FROM LUPINE PROPOSED STREET ALIGNMENT LOOP WATER THROUGH SITE FROM LUPINE TO LARKSPUR EXISTING POND WEIR STRUCTURE NEEDS TO BE STUDIED AND FIX COORDINATED WITH LENNAR STORMWATER GOES SOUTH INTO MEDINA THEN NORTH UNDER HACKAMORE AND EAST UNDER CR 101 EOF DIVERSION PIPE TO EAST MAY BE REQUIRED ENTRYEXIT PLANNED TRAIL ON NORTH SIDE OF HACKAMORE HACKAMORE , TRAIL AND CR 101 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNDER STUDY WITH MEDINA PLANNED COUNTY TRAIL ON WEST SIDE OF CR 101 MODIFY EASTERN STREET STUB TO PERMANENT SOLUTION AND WATER LOOPING VACATE EXISTING PRIVATE DRIVEWAY EASEMENT PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THIS AREA NORTH OF LOOP ROAD COUNTY DETERMINES CR 101 ACCESS 456710112''8'' 8''8''8''8''63rdPlace North SteepleChaseLaneCounty Road47 Bri dl e P a t h LupineLane LarkspurLaneGolde nr od T r a il Larkspur Co u rtCounty Road 101Brockton Lane NorthBergamotDrive Hackamore Road8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8'' 8'' Path: L:\2294\0054\Pro\EagleBrook\EagleBrook.aprx 4/13/2020 11:05 PM ShuJC0243 Layout: Site Layout Figure 1 APR 2020 Site Layout CITY OF CORCORAN ¯250 0 250125 Feet 6 Attachment Stormwater Guidelines Stormwater Guidelines for Development March 2019 Issue Cities changing from rural to urban development are challenged by the additional stormwater generated due to construction of impervious surfaces, along with the offsite infrastructure, or lack thereof, to manage effectively. To standardize the modeling and review process, the guidelines below were created for efficiency. Note: A watershed approval is required per Elm Creek WMO rules, which also reviews flow rates, water quality and volume management. Modeling Watershed Information Provide an aerial photo of the development that includes the overall watershed and subwatershed boundaries Provide a summary of the acreage to each discharge point leaving the site. Any increase (or decrease) shall be identified. Show any floodplain adjacent to project or within the project Show downstream water bodies and flow paths o Downstream flow paths and water bodies typically need to have elevations, inverts, and condition identified. Subwatersheds A HydroCAD model (typically used) has inputs that can vary by user. To minimize resubmittals, review time and effort, the following data shall be utilized. Electronic model shall be submitted Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) shall be lowered one category due to the mass grading and compaction of the soils. For example, an existing B soil, shall be modeled as a proposed C soil (unless it remains undisturbed) Wetlands, filtration basins, and ponds shall be modeled at CN of 98 Identify peak rates for storm events and proposed shall be equal or less than existing rates. o Note: There are certain conditions where at City’s discretion the off-site conditions require a reduction in flow rate from existing rates. SWMM (i.e. EPA-, XP-, or PC-) models can be submitted for review, however these increase review time. Model Setup for Outlet Control Structures, NWLs and Infiltration The model’s flow control structures (OCS, culverts, etc.) shall match the construction plan information. During the plan and model review both may be modified and revised Individual detail plates are required for each OCS, and individual plates shall have inverts identified A pond or wetland NWL (and model starting elevation) shall be set at the constructed outlet control elevation. o No live storage shall be utilized below the controlling OCS elevation. o No live storage shall be used for filtration shelves on ponds below controlling OCS elevation 2 T:\2294-Corcoran\33-Pulte Homes\Stormwater Modeling Guidelines for Development.docx If a pond or wetland has an NWL (wet surface), infiltration shall not be used in flood routing. If a pond has filtration BMP causing drawdown below the NWL, this drawdown elevation shall not be used as the NWL for flood routing. (Filtration has a slower release time and during wet periods is not available as live storage). Construction Plans Catch Basins Street drainage shall be sufficient to manage the 10-year event Typical a CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly Three inches (0.25 feet) of head on a CB will inundate a street centerline (2% slope). Spacing is 200 to 250 feet using longitudinal street dimensions of 40 feet from road centerline to half the house footprint (assumes rear half of house drains to rear yard). Dimensions equal 10,000 SF. CBs may be required on both sides of ped ramps to capture flows Natural Drainage Features Waterbodies receiving urban drainage (wetlands, ditches, gullies) may need to have OCS installed, erosion protection, or reduced flow rates to allow the feature to function over the long term due to more consistent flows from increased impervious via development Offsite work may be necessary and City will assist with coordination, easements, etc. HWLs and EOFs The freeboard requirements are: o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the HWL o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the EOF EOFs shall be accurately shown and as builts are required. The highest point shall be the EOF (for example top of curb) since this is the controlling elevation o In certain instances, channel calculations of the swale may be required to show the EOF has capacity to manage estimated flow Overland EOFs are preferred, however if a second pipe serves as an EOF then modeling will include a 100-year event using the second pipe (EOF) as the only outlet (primary outlet plugged). Rear Yards Rear yards or swales less than 2% shall have draintile. Typically, every two to three lots will require rear yard CBs. Sump Connections Houses adjoining a wetland or pond do not need individual sump connection Others will have access to rear yard stormsewer. Offsite Impacts Adjacent Parcels City will review adjacent parcels (downstream and upstream) for impacts from volume, point discharge, etc. and may require off site improvements. City will assist in coordination of any off site work. Off site water quality improvement projects may be determined by the City for assistance with compliance with City’s TMDL approach of implementing improvements upon development. FEMA modifications may be necessary due to development and implemented by City. EAGLE BROOK CHURCH – WEST METRO CAMPUS Sketch Plan Review Narrative USE Eagle Brook Church (EBC) is a multi-site church with a video venue that delivers a consistent message live from their Lino Lakes Campus to all of their satellite campuses on the weekend. EBC is currently hosting services at Wayzata High School on Sundays in what they consider to be a “mobile” site. This proposed West Metro Campus will become EBC’s permanent church site for this campus. The West Metro Campus is planned to have 1,500 seats in the Worship Auditorium, a spacious Lobby with a Café, an Administrative area for approximately ten staff and a secure Children’s ministry classroom area for weekend kid’s programming use. EBC holds church on Saturday evenings (4:00 and 6:00) and Sunday morning (9:00 and 11:00), some campuses hold evening services on Sunday. Wednesday evenings Eagle Brook hosts student ministry for junior high and senior high students. Christmas and Easter services will occur on other days of the week. All services are typically an hour in length. Staff will be in the building during the weekdays and EBC will host a few meetings at other times of the week; however, the attendance is significantly lower than weekend Worship attendance. SITE DESIGN The existing property(s) is generally low at the south end and slopes up to the north. Overall the plan works with the existing grades; however, some of the larger mounds will be leveled out to accommodate accessible pathways and to align with the City’s future road improvements. The building is placed to the north for visibility and clear access. Parking is located at the south end of the site and wraps around the building to the west to allow for clear wayfinding. Buffers and setbacks are provided around the property to meet or exceed zoning standards and the design intent is to minimize impact to existing wetlands. The low area along the south edge of the site is natural place for stormwater management and will be the location for the controlled discharge into the watershed. TRAFFIC The primary site access is a two-lane entry off Hackamore Road (62nd Ave N) approximately 550 feet from the intersection of Hackamore Road and County Road 101 at the recommendation of staff. It wants to be as far East as possible to allow easy access onto the site and for drivers to be able to drop off at the main entry. A two lane exit on the West edge of the property back to Hackamore provides significant length to stack cars on site when leaving and allows the greatest distance for stacking on east-bound Hackamore Road. This layout allows traffic to move generally in one direction to minimize internal traffic conflicts. A secondary right-in, right-out road off County Road 101 (Brockton Lane) is being studied in our feasibility study conducted by the City staff. We initiated discussion of this potential connection to County Road 101 with the County. There are 850 parking spaces spread out over three separate parking areas. The amount of parking exceeds the Zoning minimums and is based on the need for a 1,500 seat worship capacity determined from historic EBC data. BUILDING DESIGN The church will be a single-story building approximately 70,000 square feet in size. The mass of the building will be broken into several “buildings” varying in height and size. The materials will also help break down the scale and mass of the building. A tall cross tower will be placed against the worship mass to identify this is a church. The primary materials will be architectural precast concrete, architectural metal panels and glass. ZONING The parcels to be combined are located in RSF-2 Residential Single Family. A Conditional User Permit is requested for the church function. 1 23 456 7 8 Hack a m o r e R o a d County Road 101 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! î î î s s òñð òñð ñ ñ ï ï î î s ñ ï ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STI E G R D WILLOW DRIVEHACKAMORE ROADTRAIL HAVEN ROADCAIN ROADOAKDALE D R STREHLER ROAD PI O N E E R T R COUNTY ROAD 117 ROLLLING HILLS RDLARKIN RDCITY OF GREENFIELDCITY OF MAPLE GROVESCOTT LAKEBECHTOLD ROAD$+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUS H C R E E K Official Zoning Map 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Zoning Districts: UR Urban Reserve RR Rural Residential RSF-1 Single Family Residential 1 RSF-2 Single Family Residential 2 RSF-3 Single and Two Family Residential 3 RMF-1 Medium Density Residential RMF-2 Mixed Residential RMF-3 High Density Residential MP Manufactured Home Park P-I Public / Institutional TCR Transitional Rural Commercial CR Rural Commercial C-1 Neighborhood Commercial C-2 Community Commercial DMU Downtown Mixed Use GMU General Mixed Use BP Business District I-1 Light Industrial PUD Planned Unit Development ï Cemetery î ChurchsGolf Course ñ Government Building òñð Public Park City Limit !! !!!2030 Metropolitan Urban Service Area Open Water Shoreland Overlay District Parcels Updated January 2018 Adopted June 2011 19 10 30 116 101 50 19 10 ± !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C reekRushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek SouthForkR u sh C r eekThe method and timing of regional wastewater service to be determined through future study. 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 4/28/2021 1/22/2023 5/26/2020 1/22/2020 1/21/2021 5/26/202010/2020 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 4/22/2020 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\2040 Future Land Use.mxd Date: 8/7/2019 Time: 8:03:42 AM User: ShuJC0243 Rural/Ag ResidentialExisting ResidentialLow Density Residential Medium Density ResidentialMixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/CommercialCommercialMixed UseBusiness ParkLight IndustrialPublic/Semi-PublicParks/Open SpaceAgricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration)Open WaterMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion Area !!! !!! !!!Future Study AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) 51 City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers %Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 County Road 116Oakdale Dr B r i d l e Pa t hJeffreyLnAbileneLnTrail LnHunters Rdg County Road 30HeatherLn Pio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Robert LnHor s es hoeBendD r Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w yWillow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19ES t Homestead Trl Maple Hill RdCain RdRolling Hills RdSundanceRdCountry Rd Mohawk DrElm StLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd C ain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d County R oad 1 1 7 Stie g R d Bechtold RdKalk RdSchutte Rd Meister RdFoxValleyDr M y s t iq u e DrHageDr 93rd Ave N Sc hut t e P lBrandywineRdChisholmT r lTessmer Rd HighBluffLnWinchesterTrl JubertLnR u shC reekRushCreek CountyDitchN u m b e r S ixteenCo u n t y Ditch N u mberThreeSouthFor k R u s h C re e k NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP 79 City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C reekRushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek SouthForkR u sh C r eek2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Natural Resource Inventory Areas.mxd Date: 1/7/2019 Time: 1:10:39 PM User: ShuJC0243 ^_Natural Community !(Rare Species OccurenceHigh Quality Natural Community Natural Plant Communities WetlandsWet PrairieEmergentShrubFloodplain ForestOpen WaterFlood Plain (Reed Canary Dominant) UplandsSavanna/PastureMaple/BasswoodOak ForestDisturbed WoodlandOld FieldMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-7Natural Resource Inventory Areas Note: Due to limitations of map scale, distribution and proportion of NaturalCommunity types within each colored area are approximate.Source:Natural Plant Communities, Rare Species Occurence (Natural Resource Inventory andManagement Plan, Nov. 2001, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates) 27 City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C reekRushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek South Fork RushCreekRushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Wetland Locations and Classifications.mxd Date: 1/7/2019 Time: 3:19:04 PM User: ShuJC0243 1 - Seasonally Flooded Basin or Flat2 - Wet Meadow3 - Shallow Marsh4 - Deep Marsh5 - Shallow Open Water6 - Shrub Swamp7 - Wooded Swamp8 - BogsMunicipal BoundaryStreamsParcel BoundariesLake/Open Water Map 1-11Wetland Locations and Classifications Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (Minnesota Departmentof Natural Resources 2009-2014) STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 9a. Council Meeting: April 23, 2020 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson Topic: NW Metro Regional Surface Water Supply Study Update Action Required: Direction Summary: The Northwest Metro Regional Water Supply System Study involved the four cities of Corcoran, Dayton, Ramsey, and Rogers. The report was funded by the Clean Water Legacy Fund available through the Metropolitan Council in order to plan for and support water supply needs of the seven-county area. The draft report was distributed in March of 2020. A presentation of the draft report consisted of an extensive power point summary which was shortened and annotated for this staff report. The complete presentation and draft report are available at City Hall upon request. The attached slides provide a summary on relevant information pertaining to potential outcomes impacting Corcoran’s role in this study and timing and cost of supplying drinking water. Surface Water Supply The utilization of surface water for drinking water supply is a stable and dependable source in Minnesota. The communities of St. Cloud, Minneapolis, and St. Paul all have separate systems on the Mississippi River that serve their citizens and surrounding communities. Ground Water Supply Another common source for drinking water supply is using ground water aquifers. For Corcoran, the available aquifer is the Tunnel City-Wonewoc, which was previously known as the Franconia-Ironton-Galesville (“The FIG”). The FIG is adequate for Corcoran’s present needs. Maple Grove uses a surficial sand and gravel aquifer which is the exception in the area. Water Quality Both ground water and surface water sources have pros and cons for raw water quality. Ground water typically has more iron and manganese; surface water has less iron and manganese, but is challenged with taste, odor, and temperature fluctuations. Both surface and ground water sources use common technology for treatment of iron, manganese, and other impurities. If future limitations or restrictions of chlorides are mandated for wastewater, drinking water treatment may require lime softening to eliminate the chlorides produced by individual home softening units which are a primary source of chlorides. This could make it more economically viable to operate centralized water softening treatment plants and necessitate more regional based partnerships. Analysis The feasibility study analysis was completed with sufficient detail and provided reasonable assumptions for the scope of work. In summary, four methods were analyzed for the study area: • Regional Surface Water A central plant using Mississippi River • Regional Ground Water A central plant using ground water wells • Regional Conjunctive Use A central plant for Average Day Water Demand and each City provides ground water system for peak and emergency backup • Status Quo Each City on its own (assumes chloride treatment) Summary of Findings Of the four methods evaluated, “Regional Conjunctive Use” was similar to other options in terms of projected cost, but provided the most reasonable potential for initial implementation, system redundancy, utilizing existing City investments, and long-term flexibility. “Top Down” Viewpoint The four cities will ultimately require water supply for approximately 230,000 people (Corcoran is estimated to be 70,000 +/- people). This ultimate population demonstrates that investigating a surface water supply system is prudent and reasonable. The fou r cities are currently around 25% of ultimate population (see slides), therefore, planning for a regional water treatment system can lower costs by identifying infrastructure corridors and land acquisition needs. In addition, 17 wells are in the city’s current system at 25% of ultimate population (Corcoran could be installing well number 18 shortly). This would suggest upwards of 70 wells would eventually be required to support future growth. It is reasonable to assume at some point the aquifer would incur stress, and potentially other aquifers could be developed for relief, but at ultimate population a regional surface water system is more resilient and cost effective. “Building the System from Bottom Up” Capital costs are the obvious challenge with this scale of a regional project with concept estimates of $61M for trunk watermain distribution and $130M for treatment alone. Corcoran is shown in Phases B and C (page 9 of slides) based on projections likely after 2040. However, it could be a slight modification to include Corcoran earlier with the extension of an 18-inch supply line from Rogers. This could be modified based on Corcoran’s growth patterns and demands. It can be assumed that State or Federal funds would be needed. As a result of this estimated timeline, the on-going development of a potential NE Corcoran Water System should be continued since those investments will be incorporated into a future regional conjunctive use system. Governance Options for regional water system governance varies such as joint city arrangements or a regional stand-alone board. It should be noted that the Met Council is not advocating for governance of the system. Staff Summary A potential project could provide a long-term dependable supply for the ultimate population of Corcoran. At the present time, there are no regulatory drivers for centralized treatment or no aquifer stress requiring DNR limitations on supply allocations. The feasibility study covered a large amount of information, staff has identified key points below. • The NW Metro Regional Surface Water Supply is a visionary plan for long-term water supply for an estimated regional population of 230,000 people • Regional treatment and supply continue to become more cost effective 30-40 years down the road • Corcoran can participate in and monitor efforts related to formation of a regional water system o Outside funding opportunities o Regulatory changes Financial/Budget: The study involves staff time of the Public Works Director with limited support from the City Engineer. No other costs are anticipated. Council Action: Provide input and direction to staff regarding the draft NW Metro Regional Surface Water Supply Study. Attachments: 1. NW Metro Regional Surface Water Supply Study Presentation – Annotated for Staff Report Ali Elhassan, PE, PhD, MCES Christopher Larson, PE, SEH March 19, 2020 Northwest Area Regional Workgroup Northwest Metro Area Regional Surface Water Supply Study Approaches to Water Supply •Approach 1: Regional Surface WTP •Approach 2: Regional Groundwater WTP •Approach 3: Regional Conjunctive Use System •Approach 4: Status Quo •Evaluation Process –Present concept level alternatives and costs –Not shovel ready projects Water Demands Projected Water Demand -Preliminary City 2040 Population Served 2040 Avg Day Demand (mgd) 2040 Max Day Demand (mgd) Ultimate Avg Day Demand (mgd) Ultimate Max Day Demand (mgd) Rogers 20,050 2.5 6.2 4.8 12 Ramsey 26,988 3.5 10.3 8.0 20 Dayton 7,317 0.7 1.9 7.7 19.3 Corcoran 7,650 1.1 3.4 8.8 22 Total:62,005 7.8 21.8 29 73 Water Demands Existing Infrastructure City No. of Wells Aquifers Total Capacity Firm Capacity (MGD) Storage (MG)Interconnects Rogers 7 TCW 7.8 6.3 3.15 Dayton Ramsey 8 TCW 11 9 4 Anoka Dayton 2 TCW 2.1 0 0.5 Rogers, Champlin, Maple Grove Corcoran 0 ----Maple Grove, Medina Mississippi River •Quantity –Average Mississippi river flow: 7,000 cfs –NW Metro 2040 Average Day Demand: 12 cfs –NW Metro Ultimate Avg. Day Demand: 45 cfs •Quality –Used as source of drinking water for St. Cloud, Minneapolis, and St. Paul Regional Groundwater •All 17 NW Metro wells are in Tunnel City Wonewoc aquifer (TCW) •TCW aquifer available across most of region -some bedrock valleys exist in Ramsey and Rogers •Water modeling showed some drawdown in TCW aquifer in 2040 •Water Quality –Manganese –Hardness Phased Approach Concept System –WTP in Ramsey Approach 3 –Conjunctive Use •Utilize new surface water treatment plant to meet average day demands, use wells for peaking •Surface water process train •Switch to chloramines for disinfection •2040 Capacity: 12 MGD –Requires 4 additional wells •Ultimate Capacity: 40 MGD –Requires 24 additional wells Cost Development •Concept Level Cost Basis •Planning Criteria –2040: 20 years –Ultimate: 60 years –3% discount rate to annualize capital costs •Example for Approach 1: Phase A, Scenario 1 watermain and regional surface WTP in Ramsey Capital Cost-Phase A, Scenario 1 Watermain Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Total Cost New Water Main 36” Open Cut DIP 51,000 Feet $500 $25,500,000 Lateral Benefit 25,000 Feet ($200)($5,000,000) 36” Jacked Road/River Crossing 2,000 Feet $4,000 $8,000,000 24” Open Cut DIP 6,900 Feet $400 $2,760,000 Booster Stations 15 MGD (Rogers, Dayton)1 Each $2,500,000 $2,500,000 10 MGD (Rogers, Dayton High Zone)1 Each $2,000,000 $2,000,000 2 MGD (Dayton High Zone)1 Each $800,000 $800,000 Easements/Land Acquisition 300,000 Square Feet $6 $1,800,000 Environmental 11 Miles $50,000 $550,000 Subtotal $38,910,000 Contingency (30%)$11,700,000 Eng/Admin/Legal (20%)$10,100,000 Total Phase A1 $61,000,000 Capital Cost-2040 Surface WTP Item Quantit y Units Unit Cost Total Cost 25 MGD Surface WTP 1 Lump Sum $73,000,000 $73,000,000 River Intake 1 Lump Sum $2,000,000 $2,000,000 48” Raw Watermain 7,500 Feet $700 $5,250,000 Road Crossing 400 Feet $5,000 $2,000,000 Easements/ Land Acquisitions 20 Acres $100,000 $2,000,000 Environmental 2 Miles $50,000 $100,000 Subtotal $84,350,000 Contingency (30%)$25,000,000 Eng/Admin/Legal (20%)$22,700,000 Total $132,000,000 Approach Comparison -2040 Item Approach 1 Regional Surface Water 1 Approach 2 Regional Groundwater Lime Softening2 Approach 3 Conjunctive Use Approach 4 Status Quo Lime Softening Capital Costs Distribution System Phase A1 $61,000,000 $61,000,000 Phase A2 $53,000,000 Phase B $5,800,000 $5,800,000 $5,800,000 Phase C $25,600,000 $25,600,000 $25,600,000 WTP and Wells $132,000,000 $176,000,000 $102,000,000 $197,000,000 Capital Cost Total $224,000,000 $260,000,000 $194,400,000 $197,000,000 Annualized Capital Cost3 $15,100,000 $17,500,000 $13,000,000 $13,200,000 O&M Annual Costs WTP/Well O&M $5,900,000 $5,500,000 $5,250,000 $6,100,000 Booster Station O&M $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 WTP/Well Repair & Replacement (2%)$2,600,000 $3,500,000 $2,000,000 $3,900,000 Distribution Repair and Replacement (1%)$900,000 $800,000 $900,000 O&M Cost Total $9,500,000 $9,900,000 $8,250,000 $10,000,000 Total Annualized Cost3 $24,600,000 $27,400,000 $21,250,000 $23,200,000 1Based on WTP in Ramsey; 2Based on WTP in Dayton 320 year period Approach Comparison -Ultimate Item Approach 1 Regional Surface Water 1 Approach 2 Regional Groundwater Lime Softening2 Approach 3 Conjunctive Use Approach 4 Status Quo Lime Softening Capital Costs 2040 Capital Costs $224,000,000 $260,000,000 $194,400,000 $197,000,000 Distribution System Phase D1 $67,000,000 $67,000,000 Phase D2 $54,000,000 WTP and Wells $164,000,000 $272,000,000 $202,000,000 $410,000,000 Capital Cost Total $455,000,000 $586,000,000 $463,000,000 $607,000,000 Annualized Capital Cost3 $16,400,000 $21,200,000 $16,700,000 $22,000,000 O&M Annual Costs WTP O&M $17,500,000 $16,400,000 $15,600,000 $18,100,000 Booster Station O&M $440,000 $440,000 $440,000 WTP/Well Repair & Replacement (2%)$5,900,000 $8,900,000 $6,000,000 $12,100,000 Distribution Repair and Replacement (1%)$1,600,000 $1,300,000 $1,600,000 O&M Cost Total $25,000,000 $27,000,000 $24,000,000 $30,000,000 Total Annualized Cost3 $41,400,000 $48,200,000 $40,700,000 $52,000,000 1Based on WTP in Ramsey; 2Based on WTP in Dayton 360 year period Governance and Cost Sharing •Several examples of regional water systems existing (Joint Powers, St. Paul Regional Water System) •Funding Sources –WAC –Lateral Benefit –Trunk Charges –State/Federal Grants –PFA Loan –Water Rates Preliminary Findings –to start the discussion •A cost of service example indicates that grant funding will be an integral part of implementing a regional surface water supply system to make the project viable. •In the absence of a project driver, Northwest Metro cities are likely to continue to utilize groundwater and construct iron and manganese removal water treatment plants. At this point, none of the Northwest Metro cities have water treatment plants, although 2 are in the planning stages (Ramsey and Corcoran). •The Northwest Metro communities are embarking on this study at an optimal time. The water systems are not fully developed and significant growth is planned. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 9b. Council Meeting: April 23, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: City Hall Closure Extension Action Required: Approval Summary: Corcoran City Hall has been closed to the public since noon on March 18th in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently the closure is set to expire after Friday, April 24th. After discussing options with public safety, it is recommended that the closure be extended through May 15, 2020. The recommendation to extend the closure through May 15th is due to the likelihood of increased cases of COVID-19 after the shelter in place order is removed. This will further protect our staff from potential exposure. At my direction, the City may allow in person visits to City Hall by appointment. Financial/Budget: Extending the closure of City Hall to the public does not have any direct financial implications at this time. Options: 1. Extend the closure of City Hall through May 15, 2020. 2. Extend the closure to a date other than May 15, 2020. Recommendation Extend the closure of City Hall through May 15, 2020. Council Action: Consider a motion to extend the closure of City Hall through May 15, 2020. Attachments: None STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10a. Council Meeting: April 23, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Ordinance Amendment – Mandatory Utility Connection Action Required: Approval Summary: It is requested that the City Council consider an ordinance amendment to delay the mandatory connection required for the Downtown Utility and Street Improvement project. The original deadline to connect was May 1, 2019 however it was extended until May 1, 2020 as requested by some of the property owners. Staff is now requesting an additional delay until August 31, 2021 to give additional time for properties to connect due to financial hardship related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Attached to this report is a draft ordinance amendment for consideration. Financial/Budget: Delaying the required connection will have a minor impact on the water and sewer budgets revenue expectations. Options: 1. Adopt Ordinance 2020-404 as presented. 2. Decline the ordinance amendment Recommendation Adopt Ordinance 2020-404 as presented. Council Action: Consider a motion to adopt Ordinance 2020-404 as presented. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2020-404 City of Corcoran December 19, 2011 City of Corcoran April 23, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2020-404 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 51 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO UTILITY CONNECTION The Corcoran City Council ordains as follows: Section 1. Amendments of the City Code. The text of Chapter 51.020: UTILITY CONNECTION, PERMISSIVE OR MANDATORY, Subdivision 1 MANDATORY CONNECTION of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: 1.3 Limited Exception: For the purpose of determining the mandated time of connection to a trunk or lateral made available as a part of the Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project (approved by the City in 2016), existing non-residential properties mandated to connect to such lines shall do so within two years following availability no later than August 31, 2021. This limited exception shall only apply to existing non-residential properties to which lines were made available as a part of the Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project, and shall only apply to connections mandated by the City as a direct result of the same. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 23rd day of April, 2020. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Anderson, Tom Anderson, Tom Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10b. Council Meeting: March 26, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Letter of Support – Hennepin County Solicitation for Regional Funds Action Required: Direction Summary: Hennepin County is submitting an application in order to seek federal funding for improvements to the CSAH 19 and County Road 117/County Road 203 intersection. The County is requesting Corcoran submit a letter of support or resolution for this application and project. The County specifically asks that we acknowledge that the city is aware of the project and understands that the city will likely have financial responsibilities as they relate to this project as outlined in the county’s cost participation policy. Specific details regarding cost participation and maintenance responsibilities of project elements are anticipated to be determined during the design process as project development is advanced. This project would modify the intersection in some format yet to be determined after a further review and public engagement. Staff has drafted a letter in support of the project as a whole, however not in support of the use of Corcoran funds. It is requested the Council consider directing staff to submit a letter as presented or as amended. Financial/Budget: Hennepin County is in the process of updating their cost participation policy. The draft under review generally states that cities are responsible for 50% of the cost of the project that is in their city. This project would impact three cities. There is no budget known for this project at this time. Federal funding would reduce costs to impacted cities. Options: 1. Authorize staff to submit letters in support of grant applications for improvements to the CSAH 19 and County Road 117/County Road 203 intersection. 2. Decline sending a letter in support. Recommendation Staff recommends sending letters in support. Federal funds would assist in reducing future city costs if the project does proceed forward. Additionally, the letter will formalize our position that we do not support the use of Corcoran funds for the project. Council Action: Consider a motion to authorize staff to submit letters in support of grant applications for improvements to the CSAH 19 and County Road 117/County Road 203 intersection. Attachments: 1. Letter from Hennepin County 2. Letter of Support – Spot Mobility and Safety Category 3. Letter of Support – MnDOT Highway Safety Improvement Program Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery 7009 York Avenue South, MN 55435 (Temporary) 612-596-0241 | hennepin.us March 11, 2020 Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Re: Support for 2020 Regional Solicitation Application CSAH 19 Spot Mobility and Safety Project At County Road 117/County Road 203 Dear Mr. Martens, As part of the Metropolitan Council’s 2020 Regional Solicitation, Hennepin County is submitting an application seeking federal funding in the Spot Mobility & Safety Category for improvements at the CSAH 19 and County Road 117/County Road 203 intersection. Federal funding through this solicitation is available for program years 2024 and 2025. This project will involve modifications to the existing CSAH 19 at County Road 117/County Road 203 intersection to better accommodate user activity, especially during the morning and afternoon peak periods. Specific improvements will be determined as part of the design process and will incorporate proven strategies that address user safety and mobility. This project will directly benefit people biking, driving, and walking in the area; thereby, enhancing the livability and quality of life for Corcoran, Hanover, and Hennepin County residents. We would appreciate a letter of support or resolution from the City of Corcoran for this application and project; acknowledging that the city is aware of the project and understands that the city will likely have financial responsibilities as they relate to this project as outlined in the county’s cost participation policy. Specific details regarding cost participation and maintenance responsibilities of project elements are anticipated to be determined during the design process as project development is advanced. If you agree to support this proposed project, please send a letter to: Carla Stueve, P.E., P.T.O.E. Director and County Highway Engineer Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery 7009 York Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery 7009 York Avenue South, MN 55435 (Temporary) 612-596-0241 | hennepin.us You may email the electronic version of the letter to at Jason.Pieper@hennepin.us. I have attached a letter template that you may use or modify as you see fit. Hennepin County appreciates the opportunity to partner with City of Corcoran on this important transportation improvement project. Given an application deadline of April 16, 2020, we would appreciate your support letter by April 2, 2020. If you have any questions, please contact me at 612-596-0241 or at Jason.Pieper@hennepin.us. Sincerely, Jason Pieper, P.E. Transportation Planning cc: Carla Stueve, P.E., P.T.O.E. - Director and County Highway Engineer Chad Ellos, P.E., P.T.O.E. - Transportation Planning Division Manger A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered www.ci.corcoran.mn.us April 24, 2020 Carla Stueve, P.E., P.T.O.E. Director and County Highway Engineer Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery 7009 York Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Dear Ms. Stueve, Please accept this letter on behalf of the City of Corcoran City Council in regard to the proposed funding request for improvements to the CSAH 19 and County Road 117/County Road 203 intersection. It is our understanding that the request is for Spot Mobility and Safety funding in program years 2024 and 2025. The City of Corcoran supports the application for funding in order to modify the existing intersection to better accommodate user activity, especially during the morning and afternoon peak periods. Improvements are needed to address user safety and mobility from both an auto and pedestrian standpoint. In addition to improvements to the above-mentioned intersection, it is requested that the project also include improvements at the CSAH 19 and County Road 30 intersection. This intersection will likely have downstream impacts if improvements are made to the CSAH 19 and County Road 117/County Road 203 intersection. While the City of Corcoran supports improvements proposed by the County, and the seeking of grant funds, the City does not support the use of Corcoran funds for this specific project. This intersection has significant use by non-Corcoran users and has a relatively small impact on actual Corcoran residents. Sincerely, Brad Martens City Administrator A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered www.ci.corcoran.mn.us April 24, 2020 Carla Stueve, P.E., P.T.O.E. Director and County Highway Engineer Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery 7009 York Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Dear Ms. Stueve, Please accept this letter on behalf of the City of Corcoran City Council in regard to the proposed funding request for improvements to the CSAH 19 and County Road 117/County Road 203 intersection. It is our understanding that the request is for the MnDOT Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The City of Corcoran supports the application for funding in order to modify the existing intersection to better accommodate user activity, especially during the morning and afternoon peak periods. Improvements are needed to address user safety and mobility from both an auto and pedestrian standpoint. In addition to improvements to the above-mentioned intersection, it is requested that the project also include improvements at the CSAH 19 and County Road 30 intersection. This intersection will likely have downstream impacts if improvements are made to the CSAH 19 and County Road 117/County Road 203 intersection. While the City of Corcoran supports improvements proposed by the County, and the seeking of grant funds, the City does not support the use of Corcoran funds ford this specific project. This intersection has significant use by non-Corcoran users and has a relatively small impact on actual Corcoran residents. Sincerely, Brad Martens City Administrator STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10c. Council Meeting: April 23, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Cropland Rental – 8200 County Road 116 Action Required: Approval Summary: The City of Corcoran owns farmland on its property at 8200 County Road 116, just south of City Hall. The plan for 2020 was to not rent the property for ag purposes due to the signed purchase agreement with St. Therese. Recently staff has been made aware that the funding decision required for the St. Therese project to move forward has been delayed which has also delayed that project. Due to the above factors, it is requested that the City Council authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the 2019 crop land renters of this property, in order to plant and harvest wheat. This would reduce the need for the City to manage the property until a project may take place this fall. Staff envisions the agreement would have the following components: • Per acre rental fee at same rate as other City owned land for 2020 • Payback clause to renter should the land need to be graded in advance of the harvest Financial/Budget: If the harvest is able to be completed the City would receive the rental revenue for the season. If the harvest is unable to be completed the City would pay the rent er for costs incurred. Options: 1. Authorize the City Administrator to enter into a cropland rental agreement with Peter Leuer for approximately 21 tillable acres south of City Hall. 2. Direct staff to develop a plan to manage the land internally. Recommendation Authorize the City Administrator to enter into a cropland rental agreement with Peter Leuer for approximately 21 tillable acres south of City Hall. Council Action: Consider a motion to authorize the City Administrator to enter into a cropland rental agreement with Peter Leuer for approximately 21 tillable acres south of City Hall. Attachments: None STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10d. Council Meeting: April 23, 2020 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Liquor Licensing Renewal Action Required: Approval Summary: Liquor licenses will be renewed in May for the license period (July 1, 2020-June 30, 2021). Staff received a question from one of the City’s liquor licensees inquiring about license renewal. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic local establishments have not been open to the public and there is concern related to the ability to afford the liquor license renewal. In consultation with the City Attorney, there are a few options the Council can consider. 1. Make no changes and require liquor license renewal fees as currently adopted. 2. Approve a conditional liquor license with a due date for fees in the future (i.e. October 1st, 2020). a. If fees are not paid in this option, the license would be revoked. 3. Approve a one-time reduction in the City’s base fees for the upcoming 2020 renewal. 4. Utilize a combination of approving a conditional liquor license with fees for 2020 due October 1, 2020 and reevaluate the COVID-19 pandemic to determine if a reduced fee would be warranted. a. If fees are not paid in this option, the license would be revoked. Staff recommends option four, as it allows for flexibility on fee due dates and gives the City time to understand the impact of COVID-19. With the current information, we know the Governor’s stay-at-home order extends through May 4th. With Council review of fees again in August, we would understand if further closures have impacted our licensees. Financial/Budget: Delaying fees would not necessarily have a budget impact, unless they were to go unpaid after the delay. Reducing fees would have an impact on the 2020 budget. Options: 1. Make changes to the liquor license renewal process for 2020. 2. Decline to make changes to the liquor license renewal process. Recommendation Utilize a combination of delaying the due date of liquor license fees until October 1, 2020 and reevaluate the COVID-19 pandemic to determine if a reduced fee would be warranted. Council Action: Consider a motion to authorize a delayed due date of liquor license fees of October 1, 2020 and reevaluate liquor license fees at a future meeting to determine if reduced fees may be warranted. Attachments: N/A Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 MEMORANDUM 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net DATE April 14, 2020 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications Projects/Comments in blue italics are new Project marked with an * have moved from active to approved The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1.Park Dedication Ordinance Update (city file no. 20-004). The park dedication fees are based on the comprehensive plan. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan was adopted in November and included some changes that require us to reevaluate our park dedication fee formula and make some minor edits to the ordinance. The Planning Commission is expected to hold a public hearing on April 2nd , the Parks Commission will review on April 16th and Council action is expected on April 23rd. 2.Corcoran Self Storage PUD Amendment (city file no. 20-009). The applicant is requesting an amendment to the phasing plan for the project. Staff is currently reviewing the application for completeness, but it appears that the request may be administratively approved. 3.Paulsen Farms OSP Preliminary Plat (09-119-23-34-0001) (city file no. 20-011). The applicant has submitted an Open Space & Preservation Plat for the 88 acres on County Road 30. The plat would include 20 lots and preservation of 47 acres of open space. Staff is currently reviewing this application for completeness. The item is tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission review on May 7th, Parks and Trails Commission review on May 16th and Council action on May 28th. 4.M/I Homes Concept Plan for a modification of the approvals for “Sawgrass” on the 103-acre parcel at 20400 County Road 10 (PID 23-119-23-42-0003) (City file no. 20-012). The Council approved an extension to the 2014 preliminary approvals so that the applicant could proceed with a final plat, final PUD development and PUD amendment. This concept plan is to outline the PUD amendments required for the new plan and ensure Council support before submitting a formal submittal. The Council will review this item at their April 23rd meeting. 5.Eagle Brook Church Concept Plan at the NW quadrant of Hackamore Road and County Road 101 (city file 20-013). Eagle Brook Church has submitted a concept plan for a new church on this site. The City Engineer is completing a feasibility study. The Council will review the plan at the April 23rd meeting. 6.Corcoran Crossroads Administrative Permit at 7625 County Road 116 (city file 20-014). The new owner of Corcoran Crossroads has applied for an administrative permit for expansion of the existing legal, non-conforming canopy structure. Staff will review the application and if it complies with the ordinance, it may be administratively approved. Also, there are several projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out: Agenda Item 11a. MEMORANDUM 2 1. Corcoran Business Park (City file 06-005). The City Council granted a one-year extension to the final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and is still working to close out this project. Staff has spoken to the applicant and will schedule a meeting when more information is available on the Loretto sewer project. 2. Hope Ministries Conditional Use Permit for Cemetery and Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easement at 19951 Oswald Farm Road (City file 12-002). Hope Ministries submitted a request for a conditional use permit to allow a cemetery west of the existing church. The application was approved by the City Council on March 22nd and site work had begun. The letter of credit for site improvements has been released, but we are holding the escrow pending completion of the approved landscaping. The applicant has indicated that they are considering a site plan amendment application to modify the approved plans. Staff met again with Pastor Brian Lother in July 2017 to discuss the outstanding issues and future expansion plans on the property. 3. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning for Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14-027). The City Council approved the request on December 11, 2014 and granted the applicant 2 years to apply for the final plat and final PUD development plan. Peachtree Partners did not buy the property, but a different developer could still proceed with the approved plan. Several extensions have been approved. The landowner is requesting another extension to the preliminary plat approval, which was previously granted extensions that expire in February. M/I Homes is proposing to take over the project with a few amendments to the proposed plan. Council is expected to review the request at the February 27th meeting. 4. Commercial Door Addition at 7670 Commerce Street (City file 15-010). The City received an application for approval of a building addition, which required a conditional use permit, interim use permit, variance and site plan approval. The project was reviewed at a public hearing at the June 4th Planning Commission meeting and was approved by the City Council on June 25th. The required landscaping will be finalized and constructed after the downtown infrastructure project is completed. The City will release the remaining escrow when the planting is completed. Staff is working with the landowner to complete the outstanding items. 5. Comlink Midwest Site Plan, CUP, Variance and Rezoning at 23405 CR 10 (City file 19-011). The request is to allow construction of a contractor’s yard in the Rural Commercial (CR) district over 3-5 years. Phase 1 is for the 20,000 square foot Utility Construction building. This item was reviewed at a public hearing at the July 9th Planning Commission and Council approved on July 25th meeting. The approval included changes to the building architecture were approved by the Council at the August 22nd meeting. 6. Bellwether 3rd Addition Final Plat and Easement Vacation (City File 19-017). This final plat is for 29 lots north of the new Stieg Road. The PUD final plat for this area we approved as part of city file 19-002, but this plat approval was deferred until the Stieg Road alignment is completed. The application was approved by the City Council September 26th. The final plat has been released for filing. 7. Wessel Property PUD Sketch Plan and EAW for 22020 Hackamore Road (PID 35-119-23-43-0001, 35-119-23-44-0001, 35-119-23-11-0001 and 35-119-23-12-0002) (City File 19-018). The sketch plan was reviewed by the Council on September 26th and staff was directed to begin the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. The EAW was acted on by the Council in January 2020. 8. Savoie Minor Subdivision at 21801 Homestead Trail (City file 19-021). This two-lot subdivision is was approved by the Council on October 24th. The council had previously approved this subdivision, but the applicant let it expire and an extension was approved. 9. Ravinia 14th Final Plat and Final PUD (City file 19-022). Lennar submitted a request for approval of a final plat and final PUD development plan for “Ravinia 14th Addition” to allow 33 single-family detached home lots and four outlots. The item was postponed from the December 5th Planning Commission review to January 2nd due to lack of quorum. The Planning Commission recommended approval on January 2nd and Council approved the item on January 23rd. MEMORANDUM 3 10. Sketch Plan for “Nelson International” at 10409 County Road 101 (city file 19-023). The applicant submitted a sketch plan for an approximately 33,000-sq. ft. truck sales/repair operation. The Council reviewed this item on January 23rd. 11. Annual Ordinance Codification (city file no. 20-005). Staff prepares and annual codification to incorporate all of the previous year’s ordinance amendments into the City Code. The new PDF of the Code is now complete and available at City Hall and online. 12. *Request for Variance, Preliminary and Final Plat for St. Jane Chantel cemetery (PID 21-119-23- 33-0004) (city file no. 20-001). Gene Kissner is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Variance to subdivide the 3.76-acre St. Jane Chantel parcel owned by Church of St. Thomas the Apostle. The portion north of County Road 50 contains the cemetery and will be retained by the church and Kissners will purchase the portion south of County Road 50. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 5th and recommended approval. Council approved the request on March 26th. 13. *Bellwether 4th Final Plat and Final PUD (city file no.20-002). Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC (applicant) has submitted a request for approval of a Final Plat and Final PUD plan application for “Bellwether 4th Addition”, a residential development of 74 new single-family homes and one outlot on 45.49 acres of property. The Planning Commission reviewed on March 5th and recommended approval. Council approved the request on March 26th. 14. *Zoning Map Changes (city file no. 20-003). Minnesota statues require cities to update their zoning map to bring it into compliance with the comprehensive plan within 9 months of adoption. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan was adopted in November and these map amendments will ensure consistency. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 5th and recommended approval. Council approved the request on March 26th. 15. *Tessmer Topo/Wetland Waiver (PID 07-119-23-21-0002) (city file no.20-007). The applicant is requesting a waiver of the topography and wetland delineation requirements for this parcel. This parcel will be platted with the property to the west for a small division, but no development is proposed for this parcel. Council approved the request on March 26th. 16. *Vollrath request for Ag Preserve designation and initiate expiration for 42.09 acres of land south of County Road 50 (PID 29-119-23-24-0001) (City File 20-010). The Council approved the request on March 26th. City of Corcoran 2020 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 12. May 14, 2020 Work Session (discuss canceling) • Administration Department Update May 14, 2020 • SE Corcoran Watermain Improvements – Award bid • 2019 Budget Transfers o Audit, pavement funds • Corridor Planning Grant Application • Core Strategies, Short-Term Goals, and Action Steps • City Hall Remodel • Public Hearing – Body Worn Camera Policy • Liquor Licence payment plan • Finance Review Assistance May 28, 2020 • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • 2019 Audit • Public Hearing – 2020 Dust Control Project • Liquor license approvals • NE Corcoran Water Supply – Work Plan Update • Approve Resolution for White Tail Trail Easement Vacation (Ravinia 4th) June 11, 2020 • Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project Recap • Fire Subcommittee Report Work Plan • Bring Your Own Device Policy • 2020 Fee Schedule Amendments o Park Dedication; fee for Planner; fee per lot; TLAC • Gravel Road Paving Recommendations June 25, 2020 • Employee Recognition – Jessica Beise, 5 Years • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • Wessel Preliminary Plat