Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019-04-25 Council Agenda Packet
*Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet by Door. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the website at www.ci.corcoran.mn.us. Corcoran City Council Agenda April 25, 2019 - 7:00pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Commission Representatives* 5.Open Forum 6.Presentations/Recognitions a.Highway 55 Coalition – Independence Mayor Marvin Johnson* b.Oath of Office – Police Reserves c.Police Reserve Update* 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of April 11, 2019 Council Meeting* b.Financial Claims* c.Pay Request #4 – NE Sewer District Improvements* d.Accepting Bids Gravel * e.Accepting Bids – Asphalt, Seal Coating and Gravel * f.Final Plat for Larkin Road Addition (PID 27-119-23-41-0009) (City File 19-003)* 8.Planning Business a.Final Plat, Final PUD Development Plan and Wetland Delineation Waiver for “Bellwether 2nd Addition” (PID 01-119-23-41-001, 01-119-23-43-0002 and 01-119-23- 44-0001) (City File 19-001)* b.Final Plat and PUD Amendment for U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) for Ravinia 12th Addition (City File 19-002)* c.PUD Sketch Plan for Cook Lake Corcoran (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (city file 19-007)* d.City-Initiated Update to Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance (Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines) (City File 18-012)* e.City initiated Development Rights Program and Open Space & Preservation Ordinance Amendment (City File 18-014)* 9.Unfinished Business 10.New Business a.Job Offer – Administrative Assistant* b.2018 Surplus Allocation* 11.Staff Reports a.Planning Project Update* b.Financial Performance Report – Quarter 1* c.Code Compliance Report – Quarter 1* d.Planning Commission Alternate Report* e.Open Book Meeting Report* 12.2019 Council Schedule* 13.Adjournment OPEN HOUSE SIGN-IN SHEET Project: Stieg Road Improvements Date: April 25, 2019 Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 4. Council Meeting: April 25, 2019 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commission Representatives Action Required: None – Informational Summary: The advisory commission representatives for the April 25th Council meeting are as follows: • Planning Commission: Dean Jacobs • Parks and Trails Commission: Phil Christenson Financial/Budget: N/A Options: N/A Recommendation N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: N/A www.Highway55.org | 2019 CorcoranGreenfield Rockford IndependenceLoretto Medina Plymouth Bualo Annandale WRIGHT COUNTY HENNEPIN COUNTY Maple Lake Cr o w R i v e r THE COALITION The Highway 55 Corridor Coalition was formed in 2001 to advocate for increased safety and capacity improvements along the Minnesota Trunk Highway 55 Corridor from I-494 in Plymouth to the western city limits of Annandale In collaboration with Hennepin and Wright Counties, MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council, the Coalition is comprised of: •Local municipalities along the corridor •Businesses and neighborhood organizations •Concerned citizens Our Mission •Preserve the corridor by securing right-of-way and maintaining current zoning •Increase safety for all users •Add capacity, including additional lanes, access control and transit service where appropriate History of Success The Coalition has helped drive the completion of numerous projects over the past 18 years. These projects range from resurfacing lengths of roadway, roadway widening, intersection and safety improvements, and access management enhancements that have improved the safety and mobility of the corridor. Since the Coalition was formed in 2001, over $20 million has been invested in corridor improvements. The many past successes of the Coalition have hinged on collaborative efforts between the public and private sectors, as well as from the dedication of its members over the past nearly two decades. A Path Forward While several safety and operational improvement projects have been completed, there is still work to be done. 6a. WRIGH T C O U N T Y HENN E P I N C O U N T Y FUNDING NEEDED TH 55 (I-494 to Buffalo) Environmental Assessment Study COMPLETED TH 55 at TH 25 Intersection Improvement with dual left turns on all legs and improvements to accommodate a Quiet Zone rail crossing COMPLETED TH 55 & CR 134/Calder Ave New traffic signal, Expand TH 55 to 4-lanes COMPLETED TH 55 and CSAH 12 (Wright Co) Traffic signal construction 2008 COMPLETED TH 55 Resurfacing & safety improvements Buffalo to Rockford COMPLETED TH 55 at CR 116/115 Intersection Improvements COMPLETED TH 55 & Fernbrook Access Management, right of way, intersection improvements COMPLETED The economic loss in crash costs along the Highway 55 Corridor between 2012 and 2018 was almost $190 million – Based on the National Safety Council’s 2005 economic cost figures 62% Average Growth for all cities along the corridor PROGRESS & PRIORITIES ALONG THE CORRIDOR Problems and Challenges There is lim- ited state funding for planning and design work. Funding Need and Availability In- creased funding is needed for safety related projects. Crashes along the Corridor cost Min- nesota’s economy millions of dollars each year. Local Support Counties and cities have funded large proportions of the Corridor’s im- provements – well beyond their local responsi- bility for a state facility. Request for Federal Aid Without these improvements, economic development initia- tives between the Twin Cities and its western suburbs are hindered. For additional information on the Highway 55 Corridor Coalition, visit www.highway55.org or contact: Coalition Leadership Chair - Wright County Commissioner Mike Potter Phone: 763.682.7696 Vice Chair – Marvin Johnson, Mayor, Independence, MN Phone: 612.840.3433 Wright County Virgil Hawkins, PE, Wright County Engineer Wright County Highway Building 3600 Braddock Ave NE, Buffalo, MN 55313 virgil.hawkins@co.wright.mn.us Phone: 763.682.7388 Hennepin County John Doan, Assistant Director for Transportation Planning 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340 john.doan@hennepin.us Phone: 612.543.1468 PRIORITY PROJECT CR 116 TO CR 19 – 2-lane to 4-lane, resurfacing Lead agency: MnDOT 2018 Traffic Volumes: 17,000 + (at current capacity) Future Traffic Volumes will exceed existing capacity $35M Construction cost estimate $0 Funding to date HELP US CLOSE THE FUNDING GAP The Coalition is requesting a total of $5 million dollars to help fund future projects along the Highway 55 Corridor. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6c. Council Meeting: April 25, 2019 Prepared By: Officer Cody Vojacek Topic: Police Reserve Update Action Required: No Action Summary: The Corcoran Police Reserve Unit was established on March 14th, 1983. The unit started with 8 volunteer Police Reserves, including, John Kieffer who still serves the Corcoran Police Department today. Each year, the Police Reserves volunteer thousands of hours supplementing the Police Department through a variety of ways. The Police Reserves work countless events throughout the year both in Corcoran and surrounding communities. They work road shifts to assist the Police Officers with impounds, medicals, animal calls, and transports, and they are available for emergency call outs to shut down roads, or whatever other needs the department encounters. Currently, the Reserve unit has 9 Police Reserve Officers and has been recently restructuring to include the following positions and responsibilities: Sergeant John Kieffer was promoted to Reserve Lieutenant. Having spent 36 years with the department, Lt. Kieffer has been instrumental in the continued success of our program. Lt. Kieffer has trained dozens of Reserve Officers, and even some Police Officers – including myself when I started as a Reserve Officer in 2009. Reserve Officer Stephen Emerson has been promoted to Reserve Sergeant. Sgt. Emerson has spent 14 years with the Corcoran Police Reserves. Sgt. Emerson has also been a key component in a successful Reserve Unit. Together with Lt. Kieffer, they have trained every Police Reserve Officer for this department for the last 36 years. Reserve Officer Ted Schmidt has also been promoted to Reserve Sergeant. Sgt. Schmidt is a resident of Corcoran and has been a dedicated member of the Police Reserve unit for 11 years. Sgt. Schmidt is always available and willing to drop what he is doing to serve the community and his leadership amongst his peers has been a huge asset. Reserve Officer Scott VanHorrick has been with the department for several years and has been integral in coordinating the event calendar, which can be an overwhelming task at times. Over the last two years, we have also added 5 new Reserve Officers. Our new members include James Shoulak, Melissa Burns, Najib Ahmed, Corey Cracknell and Clayton Decker. Each member brings a unique skill set and life experience that complements our team very well. Staff Report—April 25th, 2019 Council Meeting Prepared by Officer Vojacek Page 2 Reserve Officer Shoulak came to us with vast experience in faith-based service. Through this, we have established a Chaplain Program that will serve the department and the community. This program will help community members in times of crisis and provide a resource for our Officers in times of personal or professional need. Reserve Officer Shoulak is the founding member, and first in-house Chaplain, for the Corcoran Police Department. This is a fantastic group of men and women who selflessly donate significant amounts of their time to serve our community. Their hard work and commitment play a large part in the Police Department’s success in our community. Financial/Budget: This report serves as an update to the City Council and carries no fiscal impact. Options: N/A Recommendation: N/A Council Action: Provide feedback as desired. Attachments: None CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes April 11, 2019 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on April 11, 2019 at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were Mayor Thomas, Councilor Dejewski, and Councilor Schultz. Excused was Councilor Keefe. Councilor Bottema arrived at 7:04pm. Also present were City Administrator Martens, Administrative Services Director Beise, Public Works Director Mattson, and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk. 1. Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor Thomas called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2. Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Thomas invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Agenda Approval City Administrator Martens noted additional claims had been placed on the Council Dias and added to the house agenda packet. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Dejewski to approve the agenda as presented. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) 4. Commission Representatives Mayor Thomas noted the commission representatives were not present. 5. Open Forum No persons were present to speak at Open Forum. 6. Presentations/Recognitions a. Annual Fire Department Reports i. Hanover Fire Department Fire Chief Malewicki presented the report outlining the calls of service and response times for the City of Corcoran. Fire Chief Malewicki asked that the need for additional firefighters for the Hanover Fire Department be included in the next newsletter. ii. Loretto Fire Department Fire Chief Leuer gave a presentation outlining the calls of service and response times for the City of Corcoran including 61 calls one of which was a fire. Fire Chief Leuer noted Corcoran’s calls make up 29 percent of the total calls. Fire Chief Leuer noted there are eight members of the department who live in Corcoran and the department recently added two daytime fire fighters. Fire Chief Leuer noted other items the department is working on including a leadership academy, grant opportunities, training with other departments, and looking for fire station space. Council inquired about the fire station plans and potential locations. Fire Chief Leuer noted the department is completing a feasibility study and the location would be dependent of the model for fire service (duty crews or volunteers). Council discussed their recent work with the fire chiefs on the fire study and their passion for fire service. 7. Consent Agenda a. Draft Minutes of March 28, 2019 Council Meeting b. Financial Claims c. Award Bids for CSAH 101 and 100th Ave Turn Lane Improvements d. AED Property Disposal Council asked to consider Items 7a. and 7d. separately. 7a. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Bottema to approve the consent agenda consisting of Items 7b. and 7c. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) Mayor Thomas noted clerical errors in the minutes and asked that his changes be provided to staff and edits made. Mayor Thomas noted the edits did not change the substance of the documents. Councilors provided additional edits to staff. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Dejewski to approve Item 7a. as amended. Council discussed making business owners aware of the of the change to the animal ordinance related to bees. City Administrator Martens noted he would reach out to the affected parties. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) Council inquired about liability concerns with selling of medical equipment. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the buyers sign off the purchase, releasing the City from liability. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Bottema to approve Item 7d Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) 8.Planning Business No planning business was presented 9.Unfinished Business a. City Hall Remodel – Review of Schematic Design City Administrator Martens presented the report noting the designs presented to Council were the 15th and 16th designs staff had reviewed. City Administrator Martens introduced Joel Dunning and Derek Gallagher, Wold Architects, to present the options to the City Council. Mr. Dunning presented an overview of the process to date, outlining the various meetings and iterations of the design. Mr. Gallagher outlined the design elements of Option A. Council discussed evidence storage. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the addition of the evidence processing space and staff was balancing various needs. Council discussed ambulance lounge space. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted initial plans had dedicated ambulance space, but due to other needs it didn’t make it into the proposed versions. Mr. Dunning noted that ambulance staff could utilize the conference room as needed if it was not being utilized by other staff. Mr. Gallagher discussed the design elements in Option A. Council discussed the views to outside. Mr. Dunning reviewed the design elements in Option B and provided an overview of the cost estimates for Option A and Option B. Council discussed the designs and access to the memorial garden. Council discussed waiting to remodel and the proposed costs. City Administrator Martens noted the next steps would be to refine the design and host user groups. Council inquired about waiting to remodel the current lobby. Mr. Gallagher noted an additional remodel could be planned but would result in remodeling a recently remodeled section. Council discussed concerns with costs. City Administrator Martens noted public projects are bid in a public setting. Council discussed implementation versus design. Council inquired about the inflation number outlined in the cost estimates. Mr. Dunning noted the estimates included a four percent inflation factor. City Administrator Martens noted one of the cost increases was the utilization of the lobby space which wasn’t considered during the initial needs study. Council discussed cutting costs and creating a price point for staff to meet. City Administrator Martens noted the project would need to complete by March 3, 2020 for the next election. Council discussed the need for the lobby remodel and designs for furniture. City Administrator Martens noted Option A was preferred for the better workflow, additional conference spaces, and additional work stations. City Administrator Martens noted staff had looked at several designs to maximize the space. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk discussed the several designs and the ability for staff to utilize the spaces. Council discussed timing and sharpening pencils on the cost. Mr. Dunning noted the cost estimates are conservative and having the contractor on board will assist with pricing the project. City Administrator Martens noted interviews with construction firms are scheduled for April 23, 2019. Council discussed designing both options. Mr. Dunning noted the design was only partially complete and concerns on the cost of designing two projects. Council discussed costs, the contingency amount in the estimates, and grant opportunities. Council discussed creating a not to exceed number and movable walls. Mr. Dunning noted movable walls are significantly more expensive than the proposed sheetrock walls and haven’t been as effective for public sector clients. Council discussed the timeline for keeping the Police Department in the current building. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted an additional three to five years may be possible with the increased efficiencies in Option A. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the timeline for needing a Public Safety building would be dependent of the growth of the community. Council inquired about how much longer Option A would last than Option B. City Administrator Martens noted there would be four additional work stations but the specific timelines would be dependent on the growth of the community. Council discussed the options. City Administrator Martens noted the feedback was related to cost savings. Council discussed the efficiencies of Option A and how to reduce costs. Council discussed the timeline and furniture. Council inquired about the windows in Option A. City Administrator Martens noted the top windows in the lobby would remain and a false ceiling above the Administrator’s office would be installed. Council discussed the lobby as a future remodel. Mr. Dunning noted additional phasing could be added to the project. City Administrator Martens outlined that the design could be discussed further at the May 9th meeting when staff will be recommending a contractor. Council discussed phasing technology and other cost savings options. Per consensus, staff was directed to bring back the discussion at an upcoming meeting. 10. New Business City Administrator Martens asked that an additional Item be considered on the Agenda, Item 10d. a temporary liquor license for an event at Heidi’s Grow Haus. City Administrator Martens noted the request was received late in the day, but due to timing staff needs approval tonight to process the license with the state. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Schultz to add Item 10d. Temporary Liquor License to the agenda. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) a. 2019 Dust Control Program City Administrator Martens presented the report noting the program was similar to years past with one additional road added to the program. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Dejewski to approve Resolution 2019-23 Calling for a Public Hearing on the Potential Assessment of Costs of Dust Control Treatments to be Applied to City Streets in 2019. Council discussed the process for adding and removing roads from the dust control program. City Administrator Martens noted staff reviews conditions and add roads as needed. If a neighborhood petitions to be included or not included the City reviews the petition and removes or adds roads to the program. Council discussed the requirement for fifty percent of residents to be included in the petition. Council discussed the policy for adding and removing roads and the budget implications. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) b. City Council Meeting Rules of Decorum City Administrator Martens presented the report noting without a policy for removal it’s difficult to remove someone from a public meeting. Council discussed allowing for some flexibility and limits on public comments. Council discussed expectations for those asking questions of the Council and outlining the process of interaction during the meeting. Council discussed creating a consistent policy for public comment. Council discussed limiting speakers time and receiving presentation materials in advance of the meeting. Council discussed limiting presentations. Per consensus, staff was directed to bring a draft policy back at an upcoming meeting. c. Equipment Purchase – Bobcat Loaders City Administrator Martens presented the report outlining the replacement plan. Council inquired about the review and other communities utilizing a similar program. Public Works Director Mattson noted the program is reviewed annually and that the sales representative confirmed several of the surrounding communities utilize the program. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Dejewski to approve the purchase and trade of Bobcat Loaders as recommended. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) d. Temporary Liquor License City Administrator Martens presented the item outlining the Cino de Mayo event will be hosted by Heidi’s Grow Haus and the Northwest Area Jaycees will serve the alcohol. Administrative Services Director Beise noted appropriate application materials were received and the applicant was aware of fencing and Police Security requirements. Council inquired about the timing. Administrative Services Director Beise noted the event would be on May 5th from 12pm to 4pm. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Dejewski to approve Resolution 2019-24 Approving 1 Day to 4 Day Temporary On-Sale Liquor Licenses in the City of Corcoran, Minnesota. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) 11. Staff Reports No staff reports were presented. 12. 2019 Council Schedule City Administrator Martens reviewed the Council schedule. Council discussed the sketch/concept plan which will be reviewed at the next meeting. City Administrator Martens thanked the Public Works staff for their 14 hour shift. 13. Council Liaison Calendar The Council liaison calendar was not reviewed but was available in the Council Packet. 14. Adjournment MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Bottema to adjourn. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:05 pm. ________________________________ Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director H:\City Hall Information\CITY GOVERNMENT\Council, Commissions & Committees\Council Information\Council Claims\2019 Claims Workbook.xls Agenda Item 7b. Council Meeting Date:4/25/2019 FINANCIAL CLAIMS Prepared By:jrotz CHECK RANGE Agenda Item: 7b.FUND #500 ESCROW CLAIMS Paid to Amount Project name 500-20430 $316.50 LANDFORM - BASS LAKE CROSSING 2ND FP, FPUD 18-035 500-20466 $35.50 LANDFORM - DAHLHEIMER PP, FP, AND VARIANCE 18-041 500-20469 $66.00 LANDFORM - RAVINIA 11TH RZ/PP, PUD 18-040 500-20436 $5,608.00 LANDFORM - PULTE BELLWETHER 2ND ADDITION FINAL PLAT AND PUD 19-001 500-20469 $1,497.00 LANDFORM - RAVINIA 12TH FP, PUD 19-002 500-20456 $443.25 LANDFORM - LARKIN ROAD ADDITION FP 19-003 (KARINIEMI/WILLOW LLC) 500-20470 $202.50 LANDFORM - ROLLING HILLS ACRES PP 19-004 500-20469 $261.00 LANDFORM - RAVINIA 11TH FP AND FINAL PUD 19-005 500-20471 $33.00 LANDFORM - ST. THERESE SKETCH PLAN 19-006 500-20335 $10,982.86 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - LENNAR ENGINEERING 500-20335 $3,742.70 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - WESSEL PROPERTY FEASIBILITY STUDY 500-20376 $313.64 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - PARK PLACE STORAGE 500-20423 $902.14 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - BASS LAKE ESTATES SKETCH PUD 17-015 500-20436 $8,428.79 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - PULTE ENCORE - PUD SKCH 17-029 500-20438 $3,267.60 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. - BASS LAKE CROSSING M/I HOME 17-012 ENGINEERING 500-20420 $179.93 Wright Hennepin - Bass Lake Crossing Street Lights 500-20390 $523.33 Wright Hennepin - Ravinia Street Lights Total $36,803.74 Total Fund #500 =36,803.74$ (See attached Payments Detail) Agenda Item:7b.ALL OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMS 664,046.16$ 700,849.90$ Total Checks (See attached Check Detail Register) Total of Auto Deductions 2,584,557.46$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL 3,285,407.36$ Date Paid to Amount 4/7/2019 Holiday Station - Grand Rapids, MN 32.82$ Police Training 4/7/2019 Timber Lake Lodge - Grand Rapids, MN 19.96$ Police Training 4/8/2019 Holiday Station - Rogers, MN 30.70$ Police fuel purchase from training 4/8/2019 Sam's Club - Maple Grove, MN 111.81$ Firearms safety supplies 4/8/2019 Collectible Supplies 425.77$ Baseball supplies 4/8/2019 Dollar Tree - Maple Grove, MN 22.00$ Baseball supplies 4/10/2019 Crown Stamp Engraving - Minneapolis, MN 47.40$ administrative assistant notary stamp - order returned 4/10/2019 Timber Lake Lodge - Grand Rapids, MN 136.25$ Police Training 4/16/2019 Atlas Corp Notary - Skokie, IL 46.37$ administrative assistant notary stamp 4/17/2019 Green Mill - St. Cloud, MN 14.71$ Police Training 4/18/2019 Microsoft 77.42$ Office365 License 4/18/2019 Cowboy Jack's - St. Cloud, MN 13.04$ Police Training 4/18/2019 7 West Tap House - St. Cloud, MN 37.23$ Police Training 4/18/2019 Olde Brick House - St. Cloud, MN 19.29$ Police Training 4/18/2019 Best Western Hotel - St. Cloud, MN 368.28$ Police Training 4/18/2019 Best Western Hotel - St. Cloud, MN 368.28$ Police Training 4/5/2019 ACH FILE FEE 15.00$ Automatic sewer/water payment ACH fee 4/5/2019 Revtrak SV9T 278.86$ Credit Card Fees for March 4/11/2019 ADP Wage Garnishment 531.14$ Garnishment 4/11/2019 Payroll Taxes 15,843.75$ payroll taxes 4/11/2019 Net Payroll PP08 44,993.88$ Net payroll PP08 4/12/2019 US Bank Equipment Finance 317.00$ Copier Lease 4/16/2019 Outgoing wire to 4M fund 2,500,000.00$ Move to the 4M Fund for Additional Interest Earnings 4/16/2019 Outgoing wire fee 20.00$ Move to the 4M Fund for Additional Interest Earnings 4/17/2019 PERA 13,322.45$ Pension plan 4/18/2019 State of MN - MSRS 2,641.29$ State of MN healthcare savings plan 4/18/2019 State of MN - Roth 1,907.50$ Deferred compensation payment to State of MN 4/18/2019 Optum - H S A 2,915.26$ Health savings account Total 2,584,557.46$ Auto Deductions / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursements 04/18/193:55PMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 1 Check Detail Register© April2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment 10100 FarmersState Bank Unpaid ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP E100-41540-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$12,000.00414363AUDIT SERVICES Total ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP 12,000.00 Unpaid ADP, LLC E100-41941-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$247.25533640684WORKFORCE NOWPAYROLL SOLUTIONS BUNDLE Total ADP, LLC 247.25 Unpaid AMAZONCAPITALSERVICES E204-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$299.9013RX-XLW3-LSUPPLIES E204-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$284.9713RX-XLW3-LSUPPLIES E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$46.5417MK-XJTQ-9SUPPLIES E100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$259.9817MK-XJTQ-9SUPPLIES E100-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$144.001KQN-JVP3-TSUPPLIES E204-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$33.001KQN-JVP3-TSUPPLIES E100-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$28.791LHV-LLJV-M3SUPPLIES E204-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$149.951VHX-CX9Y-MSUPPLIES Total AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1,247.13 Unpaid ASPENMILLS E100-42100-209 PoliceReserves$280.37235033POLICE RESERVES UNIFORM SUPPLIES Total ASPENMILLS 280.37 Unpaid B & DPLUMBING HEATING & AC E100-43100-223 BuildingRepairSupplies$900.00123649SERVICE CALL E100-43100-223 BuildingRepairSupplies$544.00160304SERVICE CALL Total B & DPLUMBING HEATING & AC 1,444.00 Unpaid BEAUDRYOILCOMPANY E100-42100-212 MotorFuels$724.851317364SQUAD FUEL E100-43100-212 MotorFuels$45.731317364GASOLINE E100-41920-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$26.981317364GASOLINE E100-43100-212 Motor Fuels$549.601318801GASOLINE - 91 Total BEAUDRYOILCOMPANY 1,347.16 Unpaid BROCKWHITE E100-43100-227 Crack Filling$233.4013147204-00DUCKBILL REGULARCRAFCO & 4" SWIVEL DISK E100-43100-227 Crack Filling$4,804.2013154563-00PLEXI MELT MASTIC ONELEVELING Total BROCKWHITE 5,037.60 Unpaid CANVASSOLUTIONS INC E100-41920-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$530.001509846168CANVAS SUBSCRIPTION ANNUAL Total CANVAS SOLUTIONS INC 530.00 Unpaid CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$205.558000014143-4 NATURALGAS - 5754177-3 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$32.218000014143-4 NATURALGAS - 5754460-3 04/18/193:55PMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 2 Check Detail Register© April2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$5,363.119884559-73-1NATURALGASBASIC Total CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON 5,600.87 Unpaid CINTAS - 470 E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.594019386422CITY HALLRUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$41.984019386473PW UNIFORMS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$94.614019386480PW RUGS E100-42100-223 Building RepairSupplies$75.994019386496PD RUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.474019386498CITYHALLRUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$114.814019386594PWUNIFORMS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$49.944019820061PW RUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$41.984019820110PW UNIFORMS E100-42100-223 BuildingRepairSupplies$64.334019820139PD RUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.474019820140CITY HALLRUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.594019820153CITY HALLRUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$114.814019820183PWUNIFORMS E100-42100-223 Building RepairSupplies$64.334020243377PD RUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.594020243378CITYHALLRUGS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$94.614020243391PW RUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.474020243397CITY HALLRUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$114.814020243398PW UNIFORMS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$93.614020243426PUBLIC WORKS TOWELS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$41.984020243443PW UNIFORMS Total CINTAS - 470 1,502.97 Unpaid COMCAST-INTERNET E100-41941-321 Telephone$72.42041019CITY HALL INTERNET E100-42100-321 Telephone$72.43041019PD INTERNET Total COMCAST-INTERNET 144.85 Unpaid CORCORAN PETCARE CENTER, LLC E202-42100-213 PoliceK9$213.54636646K9 VET CARE Total CORCORAN PETCARE CENTER, LLC 213.54 Unpaid CORPORATECONNECTION E100-41900-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$120.0050855JACKETS Total CORPORATE CONNECTION 120.00 Unpaid CSDI E100-43100-226 SignRepairMaterials$150.0010-9529SIGN SUPPLIES Total CSDI 150.00 Unpaid CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$79.06114X69843106OFFICE WATER Total CULLIGAN BOTTLEDWATER 79.06 Unpaid DELTADENTAL E100-41400-131 Employer PaidHealth$132.057628207DENTALINSURANCE E100-42100-131 EmployerPaidHealth$92.107628207DENTAL INSURANCE 04/18/193:55PMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 3 Check Detail Register© April2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment E100-43100-131 Employer PaidHealth$124.407628207DENTALINSURANCE G100-20205 Reimbursements$63.007628207DENTAL INSURANCE - HAMILTON Total DELTA DENTAL 411.55 Unpaid ECMPUBLISHERS INC E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$59.376854472019 ASPHALT ROADMAINTENANCE BIDS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$59.37685448SEAL COAT BIDS Total ECMPUBLISHERS INC 118.74 Unpaid ENEBAKCONSTRUCTIONCOMPANY E425-49450-530 ImprovementsOtherThanBldgs$459,932.58PAY42018NESEWER DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS 47% OF PROJECTPAIDTO DATE Total ENEBAK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 459,932.58 Unpaid GRAINGER E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$185.389130834956SUPPLIES Total GRAINGER 185.38 Unpaid HEALTHPARTNERS E100-41300-131 EmployerPaidHealth$410.8289048384HEALTH PARTNERS 4/19 INVOICE E100-41400-131 EmployerPaidHealth$2,448.8389048384HEALTH PARTNERS 4/19INVOICE E100-42100-131 EmployerPaidHealth$8,271.8889048384HEALTH PARTNERS 4/19INVOICE E100-42102-131 EmployerPaidHealth$677.1389048384HEALTH PARTNERS 4/19 INVOICE E100-43100-131 Employer PaidHealth$5,685.4789048384HEALTH PARTNERS4/19INVOICE G100-20205 Reimbursements$1,619.9089048384HEALTHPARTNERS 4/19INVOICE - HAMILTON G100-20205 Reimbursements$1,987.9789048384HEALTHPARTNERS 4/19INVOICE - SCHUTTE Total HEALTHPARTNERS 21,102.00 Unpaid HENN COSHERIFF-MC131 E100-42100-323 Radio Units$1,201.451000128364RADIO FEES/ MDC E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$173.841000128439RADIO FEES - PUBLICWORKS E100-42100-301 Prisoner$450.001000128917PRISONERFEES - BOOKING/HOUSING Total HENNCOSHERIFF-MC131 1,825.29 Unpaid HENNCOUNTYATTORNEYS OFFICE E205-42100-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$358.2017005523FORFEITURE CASE 30% TOHENNEPINCOUNTY CASE17005523 Total HENNCOUNTYATTORNEYS OFFICE 358.20 Unpaid L3COMMUNICATIONSMOBILE-VISIO E100-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$61.950345977-INCABLE, MONITOR, DVR, 13' Total L3COMMUNICATIONS MOBILE-VISIO 61.95 Unpaid LANDFORM E101-41911-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$132.0028920CORCORAN 2040 COMPREHENSIVE 17-001 E101-41911-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$1,051.5028921SEDISTRICT PLAN ANDGUIDELINES UPDATE 18-012 E100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$1,079.2528921DEVELOPMENTRIGHT AND OS&PORDINANCE UPDATE 18-014 G500-20430 BassLkCross FP, FPUD, 17-022$316.5028921BASS LAKE CROSSING 2NDFP, FPUD 18-035 04/18/193:55PMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 4 Check Detail Register© April2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment G500-20466 Dahlheimer Wetland Waiv18-036$35.5028921DAHLHEIMER PP, FP, ANDVARIANCE 18-041 G500-20469 Ravinia11/12th18-040, 19-002$66.0028921RAVINIA 11THRZ/PP, PUD18-040 E100-41920-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$727.7528922CODE ENFORCEMENT E100-41910-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$4,422.0028922CORCORAN PLANNING E100-41910-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$200.0028922CITY MEETINGS G500-20436 PulteEncore - PUDSkch 17-029$5,608.0028922PULTE BELLWETHER 2NDADDITION FINALPLAT AND PUD19-001 G500-20469 Ravinia11/12th18-040, 19-002$1,497.0028922RAVINIA12TH FP, PUD19-002 G500-20456 WillowLLCMinorSubd18-022$443.2528922LARKINROAD ADDITION FP19-003 KARINIEMI/WILLOWLLC) G500-20470 Rolling HillsAcresPP19-004$202.5028922ROLLING HILLSACRESPP19-004 G500-20469 Ravinia11/12th18-040, 19-002$261.0028922RAVINIA 11THFPANDFINALPUD 19-005 G500-20471 St. Therese SketchPlan 19-006$33.0028922ST. THERESE SKETCH PLAN19-006 E100-41920-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$476.0028923CODE ENFORCEMENT Total LANDFORM 16,551.25 Unpaid LMCIT E100-41900-360 Insurance (GENERAL)$67,062.0040002813MUNICIPALITY Total LMCIT 67,062.00 Unpaid MARTENS, BRAD E100-41300-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$50.00041119CELL PHONE E100-41300-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$38.28041119MILEAGE E100-41300-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$11.81041119OFFICE SUPPLIES Total MARTENS, BRAD 100.09 Unpaid MATTSON, KEVIN E100-43100-321 Telephone$50.00041119TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$40.02041119MILEAGE Total MATTSON, KEVIN 90.02 Unpaid MENARDSMAPLEGROVE E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$13.9841792SUPPLIES Total MENARDS MAPLE GROVE 13.98 Unpaid METRO SALESINC E100-41130-351 Newsletter Expenses$94.50INV1313733NEWSLETTER E100-41941-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$1,104.75INV1318847CONTRACT E100-41130-351 Newsletter Expenses$983.68INV1318847NEWSLETTER E101-41911-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$123.48INV13188472040 CORCORAN COMP PLAN Total METROSALESINC 2,306.41 Unpaid METROPOLITAN AREAMGRSASSOC E100-41300-208 TrainingandInstruction$25.00262MEETING Total METROPOLITAN AREA MGRS ASSOC 25.00 Unpaid MILLERCHEVROLET E100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$64.69159643CVWREPAIR PARTS E100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$1,172.24CVCS617116REPAIR PARTS 04/18/193:55PMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 5 Check Detail Register© April2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment Total MILLER CHEVROLET 1,236.93 Unpaid NORTHHENNEPINPIONEER SOCIETY E208-41900-490 Donations (GamblingProceeds)$410.00041519DONATIONS (GAMBLING PROCEEDS) Total NORTHHENNEPINPIONEERSOCIETY 410.00 Unpaid NORTHLANDTRUST SERVICES E309-47000-600 DebtSrvPrincipal (GENERAL)$43,000.00CORCO14ABOND PAYMENT - PRINCIPAL CORCO14A E309-47000-610 Interest$3,886.25CORCO14ABOND PAYMENT - INTERESTCORCO14A Total NORTHLAND TRUSTSERVICES 46,886.25 Unpaid OFFICEDEPOT E100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$5.00296981599001OFFICE SUPPLIES E100-41941-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$216.61296981599001OFFICE SUPPLIES E100-41941-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$58.45296981750001OFFICE SUPPLIES E100-41941-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$11.37296981752001OFFICE SUPPLIES E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$11.99296981753001SUPPLIES E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$53.94297948687001SUPPLIES E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$6.19297949372001SUPPLIES E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$9.29297949373001SUPPLIES Total OFFICEDEPOT 372.84 Unpaid RIGID HITCH E100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$604.091928112032SUPPLIES E100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$61.901928112034SUPPLIES Total RIGID HITCH 665.99 Unpaid TEGRETE E100-41941-400 Repairs & MaintCont (GENERAL$365.0082318MONTHLY CITYHALL CLEANING Total TEGRETE 365.00 Unpaid TOWMASTER E100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$550.00413658WING BLADES Total TOWMASTER 550.00 Unpaid VIKING AWARDS & RECOGNITION E204-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$277.18138602FIREARMS SAFETY Total VIKING AWARDS & RECOGNITION 277.18 Unpaid WENCKASSOCIATES, INC. E101-41911-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$1,271.05041619CITY PARK MASTERPLAN E425-49450-530 ImprovementsOtherThanBldgs$7,335.80041619PULTE ENCORE - NETRUNKSEWER E425-43100-530 ImprovementsOtherThanBldgs$3,063.96041619PULTE ENCORE - TURN LANES CSAH101 AND ENCORE E427-43100-530 ImprovementsOtherThanBldgs$10,102.5604161966TH STREET DESIGN ANDCONSTRUCTION E427-43100-530 ImprovementsOtherThanBldgs$115.00041619CSAH116 ANDGLEASONPARKWAYTURNLANES E601-49400-303 EngineeringFees$296.00041619WATER - ENGINEERING E602-49450-303 EngineeringFees$402.50041619SANITARY SEWER - ENGINEERING E602-49450-303 EngineeringFees$244.62041619MCES SEWER EXTENSION 04/18/193:55PMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 6 Check Detail Register© April2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment E602-49450-303 EngineeringFees$341.00041619MAPLE HILLESTATESWASTEWATER CONNECTION E601-49400-303 EngineeringFees$474.100416192019 TRUNKWATER MAINIMPROVEMENTS G500-20335 LennarEng PlanReview/Modific$10,982.86041619LENNAR ENGINEERING G500-20335 Lennar Eng PlanReview/Modific$3,742.70041619WESSEL PROPERTY FEASIBILITY STUDY G500-20376 ParkPlace Storage$313.64041619PARKPLACE STORAGE G500-20423 BassLakeEstSkch PUD17-015$902.14041619BASSLAKE ESTATES SKETCH PUD 17-015 G500-20436 PulteEncore - PUDSkch 17-029$8,428.79041619PULTE ENCORE - PUDSKCH17-029 G500-20438 BassLkCR M/IHomeEngineering$3,267.60041619BASS LAKECROSSING M/IHOME 17-012 ENGINEERING E100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$1,955.00041619GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES E100-43170-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$1,791.90041619STORMWATER - ENGINEERING E100-43170-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$400.00041619WCA VIOLATION - E. MAYERS Total WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 55,431.22 Unpaid WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOPELECT G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.7704151972ND AVE N: 150-1694-0081 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.77041519FIR LN N/LOT #5: 150-1694-0082 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$50.28041519CTY RD10/116000-0100-1469 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$100.67041519Ballpark: 120-1246-7200 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$12.95041519BASEBALL FIELDS/IRRIGATION: 150-1693-6855 E100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$13.06041519CIVIL DEFENSE: 120-1246-8000 E100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$13.06041519Maple Hill Est: 120-1246-8100 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$23.88041519SchoolProperty: 120-1247-9600 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$891.170415198200 CtyRd116: 120-1255-6300 E100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$0.000415196510 CtyRd116: 150-1680-4662 E601-49400-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$13.6604151919090BassLkRd:150-1687-7510 E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$35.470415199525Cain Rd: 150-1689-5230 E602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$198.05041519Brockton Ln: 150-1689-6871 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$9.87041519Cty10/Maple Hi: 120-1246-7300 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$20.63041519CTY 10/Treptaus: 120-1246-7400 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$18.20041519CTY 10/StThomas:120-1246-7500 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$20.63041519Cty 10/Stanchion:120-1246-7600 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$20.63041519Co Rd10 & 50: 120-1246-7700 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$10.450415198200 CtyRd116: 120-1246-7800 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$9.8704151975th Ave/Hwy 116:120-1246-7900 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$167.700415198200CtyRd116: 150-1684-2033 E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$27.950415199100 CtyRd19: 150-1688-8463 E602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$95.9004151920120 CTY10LIF:150-1691-6661 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35041519Bridle/Gleason: 150-1690-5131 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35041519Bridle/Paddock: 150-1690-5135 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.77041519PaddockLn150-1690-5137 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$15.35041519Bridle Path: 150-1690-5146 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$15.35041519Paddock/Bridle: 150-1690-5158 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$15.350415196471Carriage: 150-1691-0155 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$15.35041519Bridle/Steeple: 150-1691-0158 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35041519Bridle/Bluestem: 150-1691-0168 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35041519Prairie/Bridle: 150-1691-0174 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35041519Bridle Path: 150-1691-0177 04/18/193:55PMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 7 Check Detail Register© April2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35041519ElderberryCt: 150-1691-0178 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.7704151966TH/CEDAR: 150-1692-8373 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.77041519Bridle/66thAve: 150-1692-8374 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$0.000415196629CTY 101: 150-1691-8062 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7704151919301 Annabelle: 150-1691-8063 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.770415196675Carriage: 150-1691-8064 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.770415196681 Bridle: 150-1691-8066 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.770415196657 Bridle: 150-1691-8079 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.7704151919130 Galloway: 150-1691-8080 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.7704151919065 Galloway: 150-1691-8082 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$30.120415196485 Larkspur: 150-1692-0907 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.770415196398 Larkspur: 150-1692-0908 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7704151919437 LupineLN: 150-1693-0197 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7704151919389 LupineLN: 150-1693-0199 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7704151919345GoldenTR: 150-1693-0200 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.770415196310 Steeple LN: 150-1693-0201 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.770415196370 Steeple LN: 150-1693-0202 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.7704151919367 Annabelle: 150-1693-5724 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7704151919343 Annabelle: 150-1693-5726 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7704151919315 Primrose: 150-1693-5731 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7704151919399 Primrose: 150-1693-5732 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.77041519Annabelle LN/Lot5: 150-1694-0821 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.77041519Primrose/Wildfl: 150-1693-5733 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.77041519Wildflo/Gleason: 150-1693-5734 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.77041519Gleason/Wildflo: 150-1693-5986 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.77041519FIR LN/75TH AVE: 150-1693-7072 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.77041519FIR LNN: 150-1693-7074 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.77041519FIR LN/74TH AVE: 150-1693-7075 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$23.50041519FIR LN N/CR10: 150-1693-7076 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.7704151974THAVEN: 150-1693-7077 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$48.980415198200 CR116/SIGN: 150-1693-6612 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$23.50041519FIR LN N/CR10: 150-1694-0076 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.77041519FIR LNN: 150-1694-0078 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.77041519FIR LN N/LOT #8: 150-1694-0079 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.77041519FIR LNN/72ND N: 150-1694-0080 Total WRIGHT HENNEPINCOOPELECT 2,506.32 Unpaid XCELENERGY E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$35.21632605059STREET LIGHTING9525CAINROAD E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$23.72633042590STREET LIGHTINGCR19/CR30 Total XCEL ENERGY 58.93 10100 Farmers StateBank$708,849.90 04/18/193:55PMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 8 Check Detail Register© April2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment FundSummary 10100 Farmers State Bank 100GENERALFUND$137,939.41 101LONG-TERMPLANNING FUND$2,578.03 202POLICE DONATION FUND$213.54 204FIREARMS SAFETY$1,045.00 205 DWIFORFEITURE FUND$358.20 208 LAWFUL GAMBLING$410.00 309 D/S-EQUIPMENT CERTS$46,886.25 425PULTEENCORE/BELLWETHERPROJEC$470,332.34 427GLEASON/66THPARKWAY EXTENSION$10,217.56 500ESCROWHOLDING FUND$36,803.74 601WATER$783.76 602 SEWER$1,282.07 708,849.90 CityofCorcoran ConsultantSummary 4/25/2019 NameInvoice DateAmountDue Carson, Clelland & Schreder Landform04/15/19 16,551.25 MetroWestInspection RolfEricksonEnterprises WenckAssociates04/16/19$ 55,431.22 Total$ 71,982.47 H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\Council Claims\\2019ClaimsWorkbook.xls Engineer’s Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - To: Brad Martens, City Administrator From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Date: April 16th, 2019 Subject: Pay Request #4 – 2018 NE Sewer District Improvements Council Action Requested • Approve Pay Request #4 to Enebak Construction Company in the amount of $459,932.58 Project Summary • Contract Amount - $2,736,357.20 • Change Orders to Date - $0 • Projected Total - $2,736,357.20 Financing Financing is provided by developers through an escrow. Project Update This amount brings the total approved to date to 47% of the total project value before withholding the 5% retainage amount of $64,237.19. The requested amount is related to sanitary sewer pipe, manhole installation, and erosion control. Next Steps Enebak Construction Company will continue sanitary sewer installation and establishment of site restoration. Stieg Road was closed on April 11th. Stieg Road will be closed for approximately 2 weeks while Enebak installs trunk sanitary sewer across the road. 4- 1 6 - 1 9 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7d. Council Meeting: April 25, 2019 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Accepting Bids Gravel Action Required: Approval Summary: Annually the City contracts for various road materials. At the March 14, 2019 Council meeting Council authorized staff to obtain quotes and bids for asphalt maintenance, dust control, sealcoating, and gravel hauling services. Advertisements for asphalt maintenance, seal coating, and gravel were published in the Crow River News. Advertisements for asphalt maintenance, gravel, and seal coating were sent out to firms who had previously bid projects for the City of Corcoran. Bids for gravel were received and opened on April 9th. Staff is recommending only accepting bids for 2019 and rebidding in 2020. Financial/Budget: Costs for gravel is included in the 2019 budget. Staff will adjust the ultimate project scope depending on the cost of the quotes and bids received. Council Action: Approve Resolution 2019-25 Awarding Gravel Contract. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2019-25Awarding Gravel Contract City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-25 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION AWARDING 2019 GRAVEL CONTRACT WHEREAS, on March 14, 2019 Council authorized staff to seek bids for gravel (Class 5) for 2019 and 2020; WHEREAS, staff placed the advertisement in the Crow River News and provided bid advertisement to companies who have participated in the bidding process in previous years; WHEREAS, bids were opened April 9, 2019 and the following bid was received; 2019 2020 Fehn Companies $6.69 per ton No Bid Received Barton Sand and Gravel $9.75 per ton $9.85 per ton Midwest Business Enterprises No Bid Received No Bid Received Equipment Transport, LLC No Bid Received No Bid Received BE IT RESOLVED, that Fehn Companies has been identified as the lowest responsible bidder; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MN: That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into contract with above identified responsible bidder in the name of the City of Corcoran for gravel for 2019. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-25 Page 2 of 2 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April, 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City Seal STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7e. Council Meeting: April 25, 2019 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Accepting Bids and Quotes – Asphalt, Seal Coating, and Gravel Hauling Action Required: Approval Summary: Annually the City contracts for various road materials. At the March 14, 2019 Council meeting Council authorized staff to obtain quotes and bids for asphalt maintenance, dust control, sealcoating, and gravel hauling services. Advertisements for asphalt maintenance, seal coating, and gravel were published in the Crow River News. Advertisements for asphalt maintenance, gravel, and seal coating were sent out to firms who had previously bid projects for the City of Corcoran. Bids for asphalt maintenance and seal coating will be opened on April 23, 2019. Quotes for gravel hauling will be received prior the Council meeting. Bid results and quotes will be provided to the Council prior to the Council meeting. Financial/Budget: Costs for these services are included in the 2019 budget. Staff will adjust the ultimate project scope depending on the cost of the quotes and bids received. Council Action: Approve Resolution 2019-26 Awarding Gravel Hauling Contract, Resolution 2019-27 Awarding Asphalt Contract, and Resolution 2019-28 Awarding Seal Coat Contract Attachments: Resolutions to be provided prior to the meeting following the bid opening. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 17, 2019 for the April 25, 2019 City Council Meeting RE: Final Plat for “Larkin Road Addition”. (PID 27-119-23-41-0009) (City File 19-003) 60-Day Review Ends:May 31, 2019 1.Application Request Nate Kariniemi has submitted a request for approval of a Final Plat for “Larkin Road Addition” to allow one new lot from an existing 7.98-acre parcel. One lot is currently developed as a homestead with various structures. The new lot is being developed as a single-family home. 2.Context Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a final plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance and the conditions of preliminary plat approval. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat. Background The City Council approved a Preliminary Plat on February 14, 2019. The approvals were subject to a number of conditions. The developer has been working to address those conditions. 3.Analysis of Request Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the approved preliminary plans, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report and the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo dated April 18, 2019. The applicant submitted an easement and maintenance agreement that needs to be revised to comply with the standards in the private drive ordinance. A letter was sent to the applicant on April 17, 2019 detailing the changes needed to comply with the ordinance. The City Attorney will review the revised easement and maintenance agreement along with the final plat prior to release of the final plat for recording. Agenda Item: 7f. Larkin Road Addition Final Plat (19-003) 2 April 25, 2019 Parks, Trails and Open Space Under the current ordinance, park dedication is only taken for newly created lots. Lot 1, Block 1 is an existing developed lot and is exempt from park dedication. The Comprehensive plan shows a future on-road trail on Larkin. There is no park land planned on this site, therefore, staff recommends cash-in-lieu of land for this site. For residential developments, the cash in lieu of land fee has been calculated based on the per capita share of park system costs at $3,970 per single family unit (1 x $3,970 = $3,970). Park dedication is due at the time of release of the final plat for recording. Final Plat The applicant is requesting approval of a final plat to create one new lot with access from a private drive. The applicant is working to provide the necessary documents for the private drive easement and maintenance. The final documents must be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to release of the final plat. The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Conclusion Staff has reviewed the plan for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the preliminary approvals, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. The staff report noted the outstanding issues that must be addressed and we have included conditions in the attached resolution to address these issues. 4. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2019-29 approving the Final Plat. Attachments a. Resolution 2019-29 approving the Final Plat b. Location Map c. Engineer’s Memo dated April 18, 2019 d. Access Easement dated March 29, 2019 e. Revised Preliminary Plat dated March 8, 2019 f. Final Plat Graphic dated April 2, 2019 City of Corcoran April 25, 2 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-29 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR “LARKIN ROAD ADDITION” FOR WILLOW1, LLC ON THE 7.98-ACRE SITE AT (PID 27-119-23-41-0009) (CITY FILE 19-003) WHEREAS, Willow1, LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a final plat to create one new lot on a 7.98-acre parcel legally described as: The north 960.00 feet of the west 347.00 feet of the east 789.00 feet and the north 720.00 feet of the west 20.00 feet of the east 809.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a final plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A final plat is approved to allow one new lot for Larkin Road Addition, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on March 19, 2019 and revisions received March 29, 2019, and April 2, 2019, except as amended by this resolution. 2. There are no development rights remaining after the property is platted. Each lot will have one home. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to release of the final plat for recording: 1. The proposed access easement exhibit needs to be provided in a recordable form. 2. A revised easement and maintenance agreement for the private drives shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to recording. 3. A homeowner’s association agreement shall be established to ensure that any such private drive remains “private” in perpetuity, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney prior to recording. Such instrument shall require mandatory participation of all homeowners that have access via the private drive, shall include the requirement for creation of a fund to address maintenance, drainage and snow removal on the private drive, subject to City review and approval. 4. Park dedication shall be cash in lieu of land for one new lot (Lot 2, Block 1). The park dedication fee is subject to the fee schedule in place at the time the final plat is released for filing. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: 1. All drainage and utility easements shall be staked, surveyed and properly recorded prior to beginning any work on site. City of Corcoran April 25, 2 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-29 Page 2 of 2 2. Wetland buffer monument signs must be purchased from the city and installed as shown on the plans. 3. The applicant must file the final plat at Hennepin County within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. 4. The applicant must record the approving resolutions and associated documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 5. The applicant shall provide proof of recording the final plat and related documents at Hennepin County. 6. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plat drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. 7. A financial guarantee shall be provided to the City to ensure that improvements and lot monuments are installed as required per Section 960.050 of the City Code. 8. Construct the entire length of the private drive to ensure access to both lots. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to release of remaining escrow: 1. Lot corner monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. As part of the development contract financial guarantee shall be required to ensure installation per city requirements. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Henn e p in Co unty Prop erty Map Da te : 2/4/2019 Com ments: 1 inc h = 4 00 feet Divisio n in Proces s The d isp layed p arc e l b oun da ry may n ot be the actual boundarybecause th is pr op er ty is in the p roc ess of being dividedor r epla tt ed. PID : 2 711 923410010ADDRESS: 5 2 Add res s Pe nd ing, Corc oran MN 00000 This dat a (i) is fur nished 'AS IS' wit h no repres ent at ion as to com pletenes s or acc ura cy; (ii) is furnis hed with no war rant y of an y k ind; an d (i ii) is not s uit able for lega l, engi neering or s urv ey ing purposes . Hen nepin C ounty s hall not be liable f or any dam age, in jury o r los s r esu lting f rom t his data. CO PYRIG HT © HENNEPIN CO UN TY 2 0 19 Engineer’s Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - To: Kendra Lindahl, City Planner From: Kent Torve, P.E. Date: April 18, 2019 Subject: Larkin Road Addition The original Larkin Road Addition preliminary plat review memo was updated as noted below. Summary The private driveway should comply with City Standard Plate STR-3 (attached). Gravel shall be a minimum of 12-inch depth the entire length Required to pass a roll test Provide stormwater runoff conveyance via ditch and culvert as required to maintain drainage Other Verify if any permits are required from the Elm Creek WMO and City. o Applicant shall provide letter/email from WMO on any permit process Install necessary private drive sign with address identification information. ENGINEERING Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC 10365 1st Avenue North Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55441 763-412-4000 (o) 763-412-4090 (f) www.ae-mn.com ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ANDERSON 9 8 3 9 8 6 99 8 99 6 10 0 1 9 9 2 99 1 98 9 98 8 98 7 9 8 1 99 9 99 4 99 3 9 8 6 9 8 2 10 0 2 99 3 9 8 2 98 9 99 1 99 2 99 4 99 5 98 5 99 5 99 0 10 0 0 9 8 0 99 0 9 8 3 9 8 4 LOT 2 5.18 AC. LOT 1 2.46 AC. ENGINEERING Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC 13605 1st Avenue North Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55441 763-412-4000 (o) 763-412-4090 (f) www.ae-mn.com ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ANDERSON NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION N 0 50'100' EXISTING LEGEND CLEAN OUT COMMUNICATION JUNCTION BOX ELECTRIC METER LIGHT POLE MONITOR WELL POWER POLE POWER POLE ANCHOR SIGN PROPOSED WELL FOUND IRON MONUMENT SET IRON PIPE WITH P.L.S. NO. 20281 OVERHEAD WIRES CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE EXISTING BITUMINOUS EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE PROPOSED LEGEND 5' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT WETLAND EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT 60' ACCESS EASEMENT NEW HOME PAD 50'x60' PRIMARY SEPTIC FIELDFUTURE SEPTIC AREA SEPTIC TANK COVER DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 30' ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED HOMESITE (APPROX. LOCATION) P PRILIMINARY PRIMARY & SECONDARY SEPTIC FIELD LOCATIONS (TO BE VERIFIED) S GRAVEL DRIVE/ PRIVATE ROAD DRAINAGE DIRECTION FLOW PROPOSED 25 LF. 12" CMP CULVERT PROPOSED PRIVATE ROAD, GRAVEL SURFACE AREA = 11,536 S.F. 25 ' 25' MIN. 985 EXISTING CONTOUR LINE CONTOUR LINE985 GRAVEL DRIVE SILT FENCE SILT FENCE TREE, TO BE REMOVED NOTE: DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION, ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH WITH HOG RINGS, STEEL POSTS WITH TIE WIRES, OR WOOD POSTS WITH STAPLES. DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW ENGINEERING FABRIC FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOILMETAL OR WOOD POST OR STAKE WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT (OPTIONAL) 2' 6" 6" MI N . MIN. MI N . SCALE:1 SILT FENCE INSTALLATION DETAIL N.T.S. SILT FENCE PAVED DRIVEWAY APRON (BITUMINOUS) 5 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES AND 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR LOT LINES. 5 10 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: SCALE:2 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS DETAIL N.T.S. 3:1 MA X . 3:1 MA X . VARIE S 3:1 M A X . 2.5%2.5% 10'10' 12" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE MNDOT 3138 NOTES: 1.THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INCREASE THE DRIVEWAY SECTION BASED ON SOIL CONDITIONS FOR A 10-TON SECTION. 2.MINIMUM SLOPE = 0.5% 3.MAXIMUM SLOPE = 10% 4.ROLL TEST SHALL BE CONDUCTED, IN THE PRESENSE OF CITY ENGINEERING REPRESENTATIVE. LONG AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY SCALE:3 PRIVATE DRIVE TYPICAL SECTION N.T.S. SITE DATA: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 20801 LARKIN ROAD, CORCORAN, MN 55340 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: RR (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) SITE AREA: LOT 1 AREA: LOT 2 AREA: 5.18 AC. LARKIN ROAD (40') EASEMENT AREA: 0.34 AC. MINIMUM LOT AREA: 2.0 AC. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 200 FT. MINIMUM LOT DEPTH: 300 FT. BUILDING SETBACKS: BENCH MARK: REFER TO SHEET C0. REQUIRED WETLAND BUFFER AREA: 0.33 AC. (BASED UPON EXACT 25 FT. OFFSET) PROVIDED WETLAND BUFFER AREA: 0.34 AC. (AVERAGE 25 FT. OFFSET) 7.98 AC. (TOTAL) 7.64 AC. (EXCLUDING LARKIN ROAD EASEMENT) THE NORTH 960.00 FEET OF THE WEST 347.00 FEET OF THE EAST 789.00 FEET AND THE NORTH 720.00 FEET OF THE WEST 20.00 FEET OF THE EAST 809.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 119 NORTH, RANGE 23 WEST, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. FRONT: 100 FT. (FROM MAJOR ROADS) 50 FT. (FROM OTHER ROADS) REAR & SIDE: 25 FT. PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY/ WETLAND EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION. HP = HIGH POINT 5' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 2.46 AC. (EXCLUDES LARKIN ROAD EASEMENT) 20 ' TY P . NEW HOME DATA: SIDE - LOOKOUT FOUNDATION STYLE:GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. = 994.50 (APPROX.) BASEMENT FLOOR ELEV. = 986.00 (APPROX.) SILT FENCE GENERAL NOTES: 1.SEPTIC FIELD LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE PRELIMINARY AND WILL BE FIELD-VERIFIED BY A MN CERTIFIED SEPTIC DESIGNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WITHIN LARKIN ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL MEET THE CITY'S CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR RURAL DRIVEWAY INSTALLATION. 3.PAVED DRIVEWAY APRON SECTION SHALL CONSIST OF 3.5" BITUMINOUS (MIN.), 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE (MIN.) ON APPROVED SUBGRADE, UNLESS CITY STANDARDS ARE DETERMINED TO BE MORE STRINGENT. 75' LONG x 20' WIDE PAVED APRON NATURAL SOIL SAVE & PROTECT EXISTING SEPTIC FIELD 3:1 MA X . 3:1 MA X . VARIE S 3:1 M A X . 2.5%2.5% 10'10' 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE MNDOT 3138 PAVED PRIVATE DRIVE APRON 0.5' SHLD 0.5' SHLD 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SHLD. (TYP.) 1.5" SPWEA240B WEAR COURSE PER MNDOT 2360 TACK COAT PER MNDOT 2357 1.5" SPNWB230B BASE COURSE PER MNDOT 2360 R28' R 2 8 ' 20' 20 ' WETLAND BUFFER LINE NOTE: ALL SIGNS SHALL BE OBTAINED AT CITY HALL 4"x 4" TREATED WOOD POST 5' 2" 3' MI N . SCALE:4 WETLAND BUFFER SIGN N.T.S. WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT SIGN REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE REMOVE PAVED APRONNEW GRAVEL DRIVE 60' 60 ' SILT FENCE PROVIDE ONE "PRIVATE DRIVE" SIGN, PER CITY STANDARD WETLAND DECLINEATION LINE WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT SIGN (TYP.) NEW PRIVATE WELL LOCATION (VERIFY) 25 ' ( A V E . ) R3 0 ' R 2 8 ' FUTURE SEPTIC AREA EN G I N E E R I N G EN G I N E E R I N G AR C H I T E C T U R E LA N D S U R V E Y I N G EN V I R O N M E N T A L S E R V I C E S LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: JP Mansolf through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 18, 2019 for the April 25, 2019 City Council Meeting RE: Final Plat, Final PUD Development Plan and Wetland Delineation Waiver for “Bellwether 2nd Addition” (PID 01-119-23-41-001, 01-119-23-43-0002 and 01-119-23- 44-0001) (City File 19-001) 120-DAY REVIEW PERIOD: June 15, 2019 1.Application Request Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC has submitted a request for approval of a Final Plat, Final PUD plan and Wetland Delineation Waiver application for “Bellwether 2nd Addition”, a residential development of 79 new single family homes, two existing single family homes and 12 outlots on 135.39 acres of property. The preliminary approvals for this phase of development show a realigned and paved Stieg Road that would be constructed by the City. The proposed Final PUD Development Plan is consistent with this. However, due to ongoing discussions regarding the construction of Stieg Road and the need for a vacation of right-of-way for the existing Stieg Road, this component of the plan has been delayed to a later phase of development. After discussions with the applicant it was decided that the original extent of the Final PUD Development Plan will be reviewed as submitted on revised plans received February 15, 2019. This will allow the Stieg Road discussions to proceed while still allowing Pulte to grade and relocate utilities in the outlot areas north of the realigned Stieg Road. Grading will be allowed as proposed south of Stieg Road, including Outlot B which is proposed as a future commercial lot. For the Final Plat, the portion of the site north of the realigned Stieg Road would be platted as outlots in this phase that will be subsequently platted as developable lots after the existing right-of- way for Stieg Road is vacated and any revised trail locations requiring review from the Parks and Trails Commission are approved. The remainder of the site south of the realigned Stieg Road would be platted as originally proposed. The total lots in for Final PUD Development Review will remain at 79. In the final plat, 50 new single family lots and 2 existing single family lots will be platted now, with the remaining 29 lots that would have been originally platted as developable lots being platted as outlots until Stieg Road is vacated. At that point, the 29 lots north of the realigned Stieg Road will be platted as developable lots in a future addition. See exhibit below: Agenda Item: 8a. Bellwether 2nd Addition Final PUD (city file 19-001) 2 April 25, 2019 2. Planning Commission Review Planning Commission reviewed the Final PUD plan at their regularly scheduled meeting on April 5, 2019. Other than the applicant, there was no one present to speak at the public hearing. Planning Commissioners had no questions and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the final PUD plan. 3. Context Background On June 28, 2018 the City approved rezoning the property to Planned Unit Development (PUD), a preliminary plat and a preliminary PUD plan. The approvals were subject to several conditions which the developer is working to address. On October 11, 2018 the City approved the Final Plat and Final PUD Development plan for the first phase of Bellwether which included 78 single family homes and six outlots. This is the second of five planned phases. Bellwether 2nd Addition Final PUD (city file 19-001) 3 April 25, 2019 4. Analysis of Request Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. A. Level of Discretion in Decision Making The City’s discretion in approving a final PUD development plan is limited to whether or not the proposed plan is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary PUD development plan. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final PUD development plan. The City’s discretion in approving a final plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance and the conditions of preliminary plat approval. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Final PUD Development Plan The PUD offers enhanced flexibility to develop the site through the relaxation of most typical zoning district standards. The PUD allows for a greater variety of land uses, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this flexibility, the City expects a higher level of design and a more sensitive development than might normally be the case. The final PUD development plan must be reviewed for compliance with the preliminary PUD approvals. Staff finds that the final PUD development plan is generally consistent with the approved preliminary plans. The applicant has submitted a plan for the second phase of the proposed development which includes 79 new single family homes, two existing single family homes and 12 outlots. All the homes proposed in this development will be single family homes constructed for active adults. The Bellwether (formerly Encore) development is part of the Del Webb development brand, which is an age-restricted community that provides a wide range of property management services and recreational amenities to its residents. The properties are managed by a homeowner’s association that provides yard and snow maintenance and are restricted by covenants that require at least one person in the household to be 55 or older. No children are allowed to live in the community. The community is served by a recreational community center. Lot Size and Setbacks The applicant is showing lot sizes and setbacks that are generally consistent with the preliminary plat, as shown in the following table. PUD flexibility from the standard setback requirements was approved as follows: Bellwether 2nd Addition Final PUD (city file 19-001) 4 April 25, 2019 Single Family PUD Flexibility Minimum Lot Area 7,500 square feet 5,000 sq. ft. (for flexibility--the smallest lot shown is 6,128) Minimum lot width 65 feet at the lot line 44 feet at the setback Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks Front, from major roadways* 100 feet 100 feet Front, From all other streets 20 feet 20 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 15 feet 15 feeta Side (living) 10 feet 5 feet Side (garage) 5 feet 5 feet Rear 30 feet 20 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet Driveway setback 5 feet 5 feet *Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. a – Porches may be allowed to encroach and same on either front set-back on corner lots. The ordinance requires a minimum lot width of 65 feet measured at the lot line. Plans show 44-foot lot widths measured at the building setback. There are some parcels shown in the plans with lot widths at the lot line that are less than 44 feet, but still meet the requirement of 44 feet at the setback line. The lots and sizing remain consistent with preliminary approvals. The site plan should be revised to show a minimum 22-foot driveways for all garages that do not overlap into sidewalks, drives or streets. Additionally, the applicant should provide details of the driveway, house pads, and setbacks as part of their final PUD Plan application that demonstrate compliance with the approved PUD standards, as required in Condition 17 of Resolution 2018-48. Lot Standards Section 945.020 provides design standards for lots. Plans comply with the standards in this section. Bellwether 2nd Addition Final PUD (city file 19-001) 5 April 25, 2019 Architecture The applicant has three widths of homes (34-foot, 45-foot, and 50-foot wide homes) that have the option of being finished with five different architectural styles (Prairie, Heartland, Craftsman, Northern Craftsman, and Euro Country). Each of the homes has several floor plan options and up to 10 different exterior elevations. Architectural exhibits and elevations have previously been approved to comply with Condition 21 of Resolution 2018-48. All homes in this phase must comply with these architectural requirements. Homeowners Association A homeowners association (HOA) will maintain all common ownership areas of the development, including the open space areas, development signage and cul-de-sac/island plantings. Condition 22 of Resolution 2018-48 requires that a draft of the HOA documents be submitted for City review and approval with the final plat application for all phases. Staff has included a condition that final approval of the PUD development plan and final plat are contingent on the applicant providing amended copies of the Declaration of Covenants and Homeowners Association Documents to the City for review and approval. Landscaping The applicant has provided a final tree preservation plan that generally conforms to the preliminary development plan. Staff notes that Trees 1927, 1924 and 1922 are proposed to be removed, while in the preliminary approvals they were designated as being saved. This is a result of the finalized utility plan which required the removal of these trees to construct the trunk sewer line as part of the City project. Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance requires one overstory tree for each single family home and a variety of landscaping along the perimeter of the site, along the streets, within the private park and adjacent to wetlands. Plans show plantings at sizes and percentages that comply with ordinance requirements. The plan shows overstory trees along each of the public streets in the right-of-way and additional plantings in the medians of the cul-de-sacs and Elm Lane where it connects with Stieg Rd. The even spacing and location of the trees creates a desirable tree canopy along the roads, however, staff notes that trees are technically required to be placed in property owner’s yards to meet the landscape ordinance requirements. Unfortunately, in the past this standard has created conflict with property owners that are unhappy with the type or placement of the trees. Due to this conflict, staff will allow trees in the right-of-way for the 80-foot and the 60-foot rights-of-way (where there is room for the public infrastructure and the trees) but will require that trees be placed outside of the right-of- way in the 50-foot rights-of-way. These trees outside of the right-of-way must be planted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the adjacent home. Bellwether 2nd Addition Final PUD (city file 19-001) 6 April 25, 2019 Mail Delivery Centralized mailbox locations should be shown on the landscape plans. The location of mailboxes must be approved by the US Postal Service. The applicant will need to provide proof of the approved location to the City. Signage Original approvals granted approval for signage at the main entrance and the secondary entrance off Stieg Road. The Stieg Road sign was approved for 16 square feet. The plans do not show any entrance signage and must be revised to show the location and construction details for this sign. Streets The street layout and design are consistent with preliminary approvals. Condition 29 of Resolution 2018-48 notes that the HOA is required to maintain all common lots, cul-de-sac landscaping, and ponds. Staff notes that the developer is required to maintain all common areas including boulevard plantings and will be required to enter into a maintenance agreement with the City. Street names provided generally comply with the City’s approved Street Map. Preliminary approvals indicated Stieg Road would be constructed as part of this phase of development, along with an extension of Elm Lane and 102nd Place. Construction of the Elm Lane extension and 102nd Place will provide a complete street connection between Brockton Lane (CR 101) and Stieg Road when completed. However, the timing of the construction of the proposed Stieg Road and the required vacation of right-of-way has delayed construction for the northern portion of this PUD final plan until a later phase of development. The portions of the plan north of the proposed Stieg Road will be platted as outlots in this phase. This allows the Stieg Road discussions to proceed while still allowing the potential grading of the area as originally proposed. No street or home construction will be allowed on those areas until the final plat is approved for that phase. The applicant will be required to comply with the conditions in the City Engineer’s memo. Utilities Municipal sewer and water are not currently available to the site and would need to be extended to service the property prior issuance of building permits. The City and developer are working to extend trunk sewer from the north into the property and bring a water line into the property from Maple Grove. The applicant will need to comply with any outstanding conditions in the Engineer’s report. Bellwether 2nd Addition Final PUD (city file 19-001) 7 April 25, 2019 Wetlands The final plat shows several wetlands. The wetland buffers and buffer setbacks provided are consistent with the preliminary plat. Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 requires that monuments be installed at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer, and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of 200 feet of wetland edge. Plans generally comply with this requirement, however, additional monuments are required on Wetland #16, #17, #19 and #20. Staff has included a condition that the plans be updated to fully comply with the buffer monument standards. The City and applicant are working to Plans currently show an off-road trail crossing wetland #16’s buffer. The location of this trail has not been finalized, and staff has included a condition that the applicant work with staff to finalize its location. All trail location will be subject to approval of the Parks and Trails Commission. The applicant shall be required to comply with any additional buffer requirements identified by ECWMC. The City and ECWMC have different wetland buffer and setback requirements. The applicant must show compliance with the most restrictive standard. Floodplain The plans show that the property is located within a 100-year flood plain (Zone A on the FEMA Floodplain map). Areas within Zone A that do not have a delineated floodway are classified as being in the General Floodplain District. Section 1050.030 of the Zoning Ordinance provides standards for properties within the Floodplain. Phase 2 does not show any structures encroaching on the floodplain. The applicant will need to work with City staff to apply for a FEMA map change on any future phases with structures in the flood plain that require fill or mitigation. Storm Water Management The EAW notes that the applicant must provide all additional stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) for discharges to impaired waters as described in the Construction Permit, as applicable. The grading plans include several BMPs that are consistent with this requirement. The developer has provided 10-foot drainage and utility easements along the front and rear lot lines and 5-foot drainage and utility easements along the side lot lines for the single family lots. This is consistent with the engineering design standards. Access The main access to the site would be from County Road 101 at Stieg Road, which was originally planned to be realigned and paved in this phase. However, City discussions are ongoing for this project and the right-of-way for the existing Stieg Road has not been vacated. The realignment and paving and the vacation of right-of-way will be delayed to a future phase of development. The site can also be accessed from the south via an extension of Elm Lane. Bellwether 2nd Addition Final PUD (city file 19-001) 8 April 25, 2019 Section 945.020, Subd. 19 requires temporary cul-de-sacs or hammerhead turnarounds until future connections are constructed. Table D103.4 of the Minnesota fire code requires a turnaround on any stub street longer than 150 feet long. The site plan indicates a temporary turnaround at the intersection of 102nd Place and 103rd Avenue. The site plan should be revised to reflect City engineering standards for Private Development Turnarounds as shown on Standard Plate STR-22. All other roads comply with City standards. Staff is including a condition that the applicant provide temporary easement exhibits for the turnarounds. They will be required to file these easements at Hennepin County. The applicant shall also be required to install barricades and signage to indicate a future road connection, consistent with Section 945.010, Subd.19. Lighting The applicant has submitted a lighting plan that shows lighting locations. The lights generally are located on the sidewalk side of the street with one exception on the portion of Elm Lane north of Stieg Road. Staff has included a condition that the applicant continue to work with staff to finalize streetlight locations. This phase will include the same lighting fixtures used in the previous phase which conform to City lighting requirements. Staff has included a condition that lighting complies with the lighting requirements of Section 1060.040 of the Zoning Ordinance and are generally located on the sidewalk side of the street. Parks, Trails and Open Space Preliminary approvals required park dedication of 15% of the net pre-development area for land designated as Low Density Residential or $3,970 per single family unit, consistent with park dedication ordinance requirements. The total required land dedication for all phases of the development was 21.98 net acres (15% of 84.5 net developable acres) or $1,580,060 for 398 units. Council voted to give full credit for a combination of: • Dedication of a 9-acre open space park in the center of the site. • 3.96 acres of land as part of the land for the neighborhood/community park on the northern portion of the site • 4.4 acres of land for the proposed amenity center • Off-road trails • Cost of constructing the boardwalk across Wetland 7 • Cost of paving off-road trails The submitted plans do not comply with the approved trail plans and staff is working with the applicant to finalize the trail locations north of Stieg Road. The regional trail should remain on the east side of wetland #16 as originally approved and a new on-road trail segment will be added on the north side of Stieg Road to connect to the trail at Elm. However, staff is supportive of the requested change to remove the trail connection from Elm to the regional trail in this area if desired. Staff has included conditions that site plan be revised to reflect these changes indicated in trail changes exhibit attached to this report. Bellwether 2nd Addition Final PUD (city file 19-001) 9 April 25, 2019 Both on-road and off-road trails are proposed for this phase of the PUD final development plan, with only off-road trail areas shown in the Comprehensive Plan counting toward park dedication requirements. When Outlot J is platted in a future phase, the trail easements will be dedicated and will be counted toward the park dedication requirement. No other park dedication is proposed in this phase of development. Additional park dedication will be considered as they are proposed with future phases. To calculate the total contribution to park dedication for each phase of development when dedication is proposed, a park and trail easement exhibit with gross and net acreage calculations will be required. Final Plat The applicant originally requested approval of a final plat to create 79 lots for new single family residential home and 12 outlots. After discussions with the City, a revised Plat was submitted for 50 new single family lots, two existing single family lots and nine outlots. As discussed earlier in this report, Outlots A and J will be platted as 29 developable lots once the right-of-way for the existing Stieg Road is vacated, which brings the total back to the original 79 new single family lots. If the subdivision including the Outlot J and A portions are approved, it would bring the total number of platted lots to 157 out of 398 total lots. The applicant will be providing final PUD plans and final plats for additional phases of the development in the future. The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Development Phasing The developer plans to develop this project in 4-5 phases. The developer began work in the fall of 2018 and expects completion of the development by 2024. Timing will be contingent upon extension of public infrastructure. The phasing plan may be modified at each stage to better correspond with public improvements. The remainder of the right-of-way for County Road 101 is required to be dedicated in this phase of development, which is shown on the final plat. Wetland Delineation Waiver The applicant has requested a wetland delineation waiver for the portion of the 101 Farms property outside of their development area. This portion of the property will not be developed at this time and will require a wetland delineation upon further development of the property. Section 930.020, Subd. 6(B)2 of the City Code allows the City Council to waive certain subdivision requirements for lots greater than 3 acres and the City Council has previously granted exemptions from the wetland delineation requirements. Staff recommends approval of the wetland waiver for the 101 Farms property because no physical changes or development are proposed currently, and the parcel will continue to be used as agricultural land. Bellwether 2nd Addition Final PUD (city file 19-001) 10 April 25, 2019 C. Conclusions Staff finds that the proposed plan is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and preliminary PUD approvals. The staff report noted the outstanding issues that must be addressed and we have included conditions in the attached resolutions to address these issues. 5. Summary Staff recommends that the City Council approve the final PUD development plan for the entire Bellwether 2nd Addition, including the Outlot J area that will be developed after Stieg Road is realigned. Staff also recommends the City Council approve the revised final plat and the wetland delineation waiver for the 101 Farms parcel. This will allow the developer to continuing working with the City to grade the entire area for stormwater management and to realign Stieg Road and the associated utilities. When Stieg Road is realigned and the old portion vacated, then the developer will file a final plat for the northern portion for Council approval. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt the following: 1. Resolution 2019-30 approving wetland delineation waiver 2. Resolution 2019-31 approving final PUD development plan 3. Resolution 2019-32 approving final plat and development contract for Bellwether 2nd Addition Attachments 1. Resolution 2019-30 approving wetland delineation waiver 2. Resolution 2019-31 approving the final PUD development plan 3. Resolution 2019-32 approving final plat and development contract 4. Development Contract 5. Location Map 6. Engineer’s Memo dated March 27, 2019 7. Applicant’s narrative dated January 25, 2019 8. Wetland Waiver Request Letter dated March 19, 2019 9. Trail Changes Exhibit dated March 26, 2019 10. Existing Conditions Survey Dated April 16, 2018 and April 5, 2019 11. Final PUD Development Plans and exhibits dated February 1, 2019 and February 15, 2019 12. Final Plat Dated March 21, 2019. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-30 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A WETLAND DELINEATION EXEMPTION FOR “BELLWETHER 2nd ADDITION” FOR PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC (PID 01-119-23- 41-0001, 01-119-23-43-0002 and 01-119-23-44-0001) (CITY FILE 19-001) WHEREAS, Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC (“the applicant”) has requested a waiver from the wetland delineation requirements for a subdivision as allowed in Section 930.020, Subd. 6(B)3 of the Corcoran Subdivision Ordinance for property legally described as follows: The south 292.70 feet of the west 595.12 feet of the north 1/3 of the East 1/2 of the Southeast Quarter, Section 1, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the parcel was not included in the original sketch plan for the development and a wetland delineation was not completed for this parcel when the remainder of the site was completed; and WHEREAS, a wetland delineation has been completed for the portion of the parcel that will be purchased by Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC; and WHEREAS, the Corcoran City Council reviewed this item at their meeting on April 25, 2019; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the wetland delineation waiver based on the following findings and conditions: 1. The wetland delineation waiver is approved for the portion of the property planned as Lot 1, Block 5, Bellwether 2nd Addition only. No new construction proposed for the proposed lot. 2. A wetland delineation shall be required prior to approval of any development located on the parcel (Lot 1, Block 5, Bellwether 2nd Addition). 3. The existing use is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 4. The use is generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. 5. No other exemptions or variances are granted. 6. Granting the wetland delineation exemption neither grants nor implies approval of any plat. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-30 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April, 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-31 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLAN FOR “BELLWETHER 2nd ADDITION” (FORMERLY ENCORE) FOR PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC (PID 01- 119-23-41-0001, 01-119-23-43-0002 and 01-119-23-44-0001) (CITY FILE 19-001) WHEREAS, Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a final PUD (planned unit development) plan for “Bellwether 2nd Addition” for 79 new residential lots, two existing residential lots and 12 outlots in the second phase of a multi-phase residential development on 135.39 acres of property legally described as: The South Two-thirds of the Southeast Quarter except road, Section One, Township One Hundred Nineteen, Range Twenty-three, Town of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And The south 292.70 feet of the west 595.12 feet of the north 1/3 of the East 1/2 of the Southeast Quarter, Section 1, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a public meeting and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that it should and hereby does approve the request for a final PUD development plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. A final PUD plan is approved to allow the creation of 79 lots for new single family homes, two lots for existing single family homes and 12 outlots in accordance with the application materials and plans received by the City on February 1, 2019 and revisions received on February 15, 2019 and March 21, 2019 except as amended by this resolution. a. Home construction and street construction shall only be permitted on platted lots. b. Grading and utility work may be allowed on outlots as permitted by the City Engineer. However, home and street construction shall not be permitted in these areas until they are platted as lots in a future plat. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the final plat, wetland delineation waiver and development contract. 3. The development shall be subject to all conditions of the “Encore” (now Bellwether) preliminary PUD development plan approval and all amendments. 4. The development is subject to Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission review and approval. 5. The application shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated March 27, 2019. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-31 Page 2 of 3 6. Park dedication is based on the development of the entire Bellwether site approved under the preliminary PUD and shall be the equivalent of 21.98 acres. No park dedication is provided in this phase. 7. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. a. Additional wetland buffer signs are required on Wetland #16, #17, #19 and #20. The revised plan must be submitted for City review and approval. b. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. c. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. d. Monuments and signs shall be installed prior to approval of the building permit. 8. Revise trail plans to reflect the following staff recommendations: a. The trail shown on the north side of 102nd Place should be moved to the South Side of 102nd Place, reflecting condition 49(H) of Resolution 2018-48. b. The trail south of Stieg Road should be indicated as a proposed trail with this phase of development, as the City will include this trail as part of the construction of the realigned Stieg Road. c. The regional trail connection should be shown on the east side of wetland #16. A new on-road trail segment on the north side of Stieg should be shown on the plans to connect to the regional trail east of wetland #16. 9. The development shall comply with the City’s requirements regarding fire access, fire protection and fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, fire department connections and fire lane signage. 10. Final copies of the amended Declaration of Covenants and Homeowners Association Documents shall be submitted for review and approval. 11. Details of the driveways, house pads and setbacks as required in Condition 17 of Resolution 2018-48 shall be submitted for staff review and approval. 12. The original approvals granted a 16 square foot development sign at the Stieg Road entrance. The civil and landscape plans must be revised to show the location of this sign. Final sign detail must be submitted for City review and approval. 13. A final landscaping plan with all species of shrubs, trees, and plant materials shall be submitted for staff review and approval. The revised plans shall: a. Be revised to either move all trees outside of the right-of-way or trees shall be allowed in the 80-foot or 60-foot rights-of-way but shall not be permitted in the 50-foot right-of-way. 14. Plans shall be revised as follows: a. Show minimum 22-foot driveways in all lots. b. The temporary turnaround at the intersection of 102nd Place and 103rd Avenue should be revised to reflect City engineering standards for Private Development Turnarounds. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-31 Page 3 of 3 c. Wetland Buffer Monument signs shall be revised to provide additional monuments at lot lines and where changes in contours occurs. 15. Lighting should comply with the lighting requirements of Section 1060.040 of the Zoning Ordinance and generally be located on the sidewalk side of the street. a. The applicant should work with staff to finalize street light locations. 16. The plans show centralized mailbox locations. These mailbox locations shall be approved by the US Postal Service and proof of the approved locations shall be provided to the City, prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Drainage and utility easements must be provided over all wetlands, wetland buffers and ponds. 18. The following documents must be approved by the City Attorney and recorded at Hennepin County: a. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement b. Temporary Turnaround Easement c. Temporary Cul-de-sac easement d. Maintenance and Encroachment agreements for landscaping in the public right- of-way. 19. The development contract must be executed by the developer and the City and must be filed with the final plat. 20. The applicant shall provide proof of recording the final plat and related documents at Hennepin County. 21. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plan drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April, 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-32 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR “BELLWETHER 2nd ADDITION” FOR PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC (PID 01-119-23-41-0001, 01-119-23- 43-0002 and 01-119-23-44-0001) (CITY FILE 19-001) WHEREAS, Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a final PUD (planned unit development) plan for “Bellwether 2nd Addition” for 50 new residential lots, two existing residential lots and nine outlots in the second phase of a multi-phase residential development on 135.39 acres of property legally described as: The South Two-thirds of the Southeast Quarter except road, Section One, Township One Hundred Nineteen, Range Twenty-three, Town of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And The south 292.70 feet of the west 595.12 feet of the north 1/3 of the East 1/2 of the Southeast Quarter, Section 1, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. FURTHER, that the development contract for said plat shall be completed by city staff and the Mayor and that the City Administrator be authorized to execute the development contract on behalf of the City; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that it should and hereby does approve the request for a final plat for Bellwether 2nd Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. A final plat is approved to allow the creation of 50 lots for new single family homes, two lots for existing single family homes and nine outlots in accordance with the application materials and plans received by the City on February 1, 2019, revised plans received February 15, 2019 and the revised final plat received on March 21, 2019 except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the final PUD development plan, wetland delineation waiver and development contract. 3. The development of outlots J and A is contingent on the vacation of the right-of-way for the existing Stieg Road. 4. The development contract must be amended and executed by the developer and the City and must be filed with the final plat. 5. Development is subject to all conditions of the “Encore” (now Bellwether) preliminary plat and all amendments. 6. The extension of sanitary sewer and municipal water is required to serve this site. Approval of this final plat is contingent upon extension of these services to the site. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-32 Page 2 of 2 7. The developer must submit a final plat for each future phase of development. No final approvals are granted at this time for phases of development. 8. Park dedication is based on the development of the entire Bellwether and shall be land dedication at the time of final plat for the phases that include public park dedication , as outlined in the PUD approvals. No park dedication is provided in this phase. 9. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo, dated March 27, 2019. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: 10. Wetland buffer monument signs must be purchased from the city and installed as shown on the plans. 11. The applicant must file the final plat for phase 2 at Hennepin County within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. 12. Record the approving resolutions and associated documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 13. The applicant shall provide proof of recording the final plat and related documents at Hennepin County. 14. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plat drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to release of remaining escrow: 15. Lot corner monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. A financial guarantee shall be required to ensure installation per city requirements. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April, 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) BELLWETHER 2ND ADDITION CONTRACT dated _____________, 2019, by and between the CITY OF CORCORAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC (the “Developer”). This is an amendment to the Bellwether Development Contract dated October 16, 2018. 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for Bellwether 2nd Addition (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described in Exhibit A. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer shall enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat upon City approval with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Unless separate written approval has been given by the City, within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat, development contract and other associated documents have been recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office and proof of recording has been provided to the City, and 4) the City has issued written notice that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. However, the Developer may be allowed to begin grading the site when items 1, 2 and 4 of the previous sentence have been satisfied. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has failed to fulfill all obligations in this Contract and the failure has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Park charges and area charges for sewer and water referred to in this Contract are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the plat that are designated in an approved preliminary plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are final platted into lots and blocks. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within eight (8) years after preliminary plat approval. 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For eight (8) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat unless required by - 2 – state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Exhibit A – Legal Description Plan A – Final Plat, dated 03/21/19 Plan B – Final Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan, dated 02/15/19 Plan C – Final Tree Preservation and Reforestation Plan, dated 02/15/19 Plan D – Final Street Lighting Plan, 02/01/19 Plan E – Final Landscape Plan, dated 02/15/19 8. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for all of the following improvements: • Streets • Sanitary Sewer • Watermain • Surface Water Facilities (pipe, ponds, rain gardens, etc.) • Grading and Erosion Control • Sidewalks/Trails • Street Lighting • Underground Utilities • Street Signs and Traffic Control Signs • Landscaping Required by Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance • Tree Preservation • Wetland Mitigation and Buffers • Monuments Required by Minnesota Statutes • Miscellaneous Facilities The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the city engineer or designee. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide full-time field inspection personnel in order for the Developer's engineer to be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer and/or the Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his or her engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at City Hall with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. All labor and work shall be done and performed in the best and most workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No deviations from the approved plans and - 3 – specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the city engineer or designee. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors being considered for retention by the Developer for the performance of the work required by the contract. The Developer shall not do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this contract, for which reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is first approved in writing by the city engineer or designee. The Developer shall be responsible for construction of all improvements in conformance with the approved plans and specs. 9. CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Commission members, and corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such individuals have greater than a 25% ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 8 above. 10. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS. The City intends to make improvements to realign Stieg Road and to improve the intersection of Stieg Road at County Road 101. The public improvements are more fully detailed in the May 2018 memo prepared by Wenck Associates, Inc., the city’s engineer. The City shall design and install and the developer shall pay for the following improvements, which shall be paid at the time the final plat for phase II is released for recording unless otherwise noted: A. CSAH 101/Stieg Road intersection improvements, as outlined in the feasibility study and estimated at $385,000, which will be due with this phase of development. The developer has previously provided a $25,000 deposit and the remaining $360,000 shall be provided with this phase. B. Stieg Road Improvements, as outlined in the feasibility study and estimated at $500,000 which will be due with this phase of development. The developer has previously provided a $50,000 deposit and the remaining $450,000 shall be provided with this phase. The developer agrees to pay the City the cost of these improvements as outlined above. The City will notify the developer of required reimbursement under this paragraph for design and construction of such improvements. The costs to be reimbursed include the actual cost to the City for construction of the improvements plus the allocation of the engineering, legal, administrative and other similar costs of the project based on the relative construction costs of the improvements. The developer reserves the right to be refunded for any unused portion of the estimated cost vs the actual cost of each improvement. 11. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: • Hennepin County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights of Way • Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains/Wells • NPDES Permits • MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal - 4 – • City of Corcoran for Building Permits and Building Demolition • MCES for Sanitary Sewer Connections • Watershed Permits 12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements in this phase by October 31, 2019, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on streets. The City will not accept new public streets in phase II until 80% of the homes in phase II have received a certificate of occupancy and the streets have weathered a full winter season. Final wear course placement outside of this time frame must have the written approval of the City Engineer. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 13. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 14. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress for grading, public utility construction, and street construction is restricted to access the subdivision via County Road 101. No construction traffic is permitted on other adjacent local streets. 15. GRADING PLAN. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading drainage and erosion control plan, Plan "B". The plan shall conform to City of Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. 16. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. Erosion control practices must comply with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s Best Management Practices. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All erosion control shall comply with Section 950 (Erosion Control) of the Corcoran City Code and the Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 17. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on the same and to direct attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the event residences are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage to ensure that the streets are passable to traffic and emergency vehicles. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the subdivision swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill, track, or wash onto the street from Developer’s operation. 18. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract and acceptance of the work by the City, the improvements lying within public easements or right-of-way shall become City property. Prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits: • Contractor’s Certificate - 5 – • Engineer’s Certificate • Land Surveyor’s Certificate 19. PARK DEDICATION. No land dedication is required or provided for parks in this phase of development. 20. WATERMAIN / STORAGE TRUNK LINE AREA CHARGE (TLAC). This plat is subject to a watermain/storage trunk line area charge (TLAC). The charge is calculated as follows: 23.72 net acres (based on pre-developable area) x $5,948 per acre = $141,086.56 for Bellwether 2nd Addition. Future phases shall be cash with the final plat for each future phase subject to the then-current rates. 21. WATER CONNECTION CHARGE. This plat is subject to a water connection charge calculated as follows: 50 units x $1,182 per unit = $59,100. The fees shall be paid at the time of building permit. Future development shall be cash at the time of issuance of each building permit at the then-current rates. The developer will be responsible for payment of the then-current water connection charge set by the City of Maple Grove. 22. SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LINE AREA CHARGE (TLAC). This plat is subject to a sanitary sewer trunk line area charge (TLAC). The charge is calculated as follows: The charge is calculated as follows: 23.72 net acres (based on pre-developable area) x $3,925 per acre = $93,101 for Bellwether 2nd Addition. Future phases shall be cash with the final plat for each future phase subject to the then-current rates. The developer will also be responsible for payment of the then-current SAC fee set by the Metropolitan Council. 23. SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGE. This plat is subject to a sanitary sewer connection charge calculated as follows: 50 units x $1,182 per unit = $59,100. The fees shall be paid at the time of building permit. Future development shall be cash at the time of issuance of each building permit at the then-current rates. 24. BUILDING PERMITS/CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. A. Curbing, and one lift of asphalt shall be installed on all public and private streets prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, except one model home on a lot acceptable to the City Planner may be issued a certificate of occupancy if needed for the Parade of Homes. B. The Developer shall comply with the City of Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. C. Prior to issuance of building permits, wetland buffer monuments shall be placed in accordance with the City’s zoning ordinance. Specifications for the monuments are available from the City Planner. D. Failure to fulfill any of the terms of this Contract by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties, and the halting of all work in the plat. - 6 – E. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, their contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are tested and approved by the City Engineer. 25. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS/TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS. Street name signs shall be installed by the Developer in accordance with the City of Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. The Developer shall install traffic control signs in accordance with the plan approved by the City Engineer and Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. All signs must be installed prior to final building inspection approval or earlier if necessary as determined by the City Engineer. 26. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION AND OPERATION COSTS. The developer shall pay for and install all street lights. The street light shall be of a design approved by the City. The developer shall be responsible for street light operation and maintenance costs until such time as the City accepts the public street where the streetlights are located. After the acceptance the City shall be responsible for all costs, subject to the street lighting policy. The costs of operation are dependent upon the operation costs for Wright Hennepin Electric and Xcel Energy under contract franchise with the City of Corcoran. 27. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. The City may require Developer to post funds in an escrow account, at its discretion. In the event the cash escrow amount is insufficient, Developer shall post additional escrow funds as determined by the City Planner within ten (10) days of written demand. Failure to make payment of the additional escrow amount shall permit the City to supplement those amounts from any other sureties posted by Developer. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this contract. This is a personal obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. - 7 – E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 28. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Compliance with the conditions of the original approvals, and the conditions of PUD Amendments, including the Wetland Delineation Waiver (Resolution 2019-30), PUD Final Development Plan (Resolution 2019-31) and Final Plat approval (Resolution 2019-32), as provided in Exhibit B. B. The Developer shall install a temporary turnaround on the west end of 102nd Place until it is extended to the west with the third phase of the Bellwether development. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall furnish the City an appropriately executed temporary turnaround easement, in recordable form. C. The Developer shall post a $5,000.00 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners. The security was calculated as follows: 50 lots at $100.00 per lot. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. In addition, the certificate of survey must also include a certification that all irons for a specific lot have either been found or set prior to the issuance of a building permit for that lot. D. The Developer must obtain a sign permit from the City Building Official prior to installation of any subdivision identification signs. E. The Developer shall supply a complete set of the approved construction plans in an AutoCAD.DWG electronic file format before the preconstruction conference. F. The Developer shall include the “City of Corcoran’s Standard Detail Specifications” (all applicable sections) in the contract documents of their improvement project. 29. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in conjunction with a sale of the entire land, the Developer may, without the consent of the City, assign this Contract to a limited liability company or other entity in which the Developer or an affiliate thereof has a controlling membership or other controlling ownership interest, provided that such assignee assumes in writing the obligations of Developer under this Contract. - 8 – B. Certain retaining walls will require a Building Permit. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the Building Official evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls identified on the development plans or by special conditions referred to in this Contract shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. C. Appropriate legal documents including, but not limited to, those regarding Homeowner Association documents, conservation easements, covenants and restrictions, as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final Plat. D. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given thirty (30) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The insurance shall be primary and non-contributory as to any policy maintained by the City. E. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. F. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. G. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for failure to fulfill any of the foregoing covenants. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often - 9 – and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 30. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 31. WARRANTY/PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit or performance bond for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to one (1) year from the date of final written acceptance, unless the wearing course is placed during the same construction season as the bituminous base course. In those instances, the subdivider shall guarantee all work, including street construction, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, material and equipment for a period of two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one full growing season following installation. Following construction, a certification signed by the design landscape architect shall be filed with the City evidencing that the was installed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. 32. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in a form acceptable to the City, from a bank, cash escrow or a combination cash escrow and Letter of Credit ("security") for $3,113,964.37, which represents 100 percent of the estimated cost of the Improvements. The letter of credit shall include an automatic renewal clause. - 10 – The letter of credit shall guarantee to the City the construction and satisfactory completion of all items to be completed by the developer; that the letter of credit shall be reduced from time to time as work is performed and accepted in a satisfactory manner; that the city engineer may reduce the letter of credit to the amount reasonably estimated by the City engineer to be necessary to cover the remaining construction obligations; however, the letter of credit shall not be reduced below the amount estimated by the City to cover all obligations of development including payment of costs and expenses incurred by the City for legal, engineering, planning and any other costs until a maintenance bond for period of one year, satisfactory to the city attorney and the city engineer has been provided by the developer or its subcontractor. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: - 11 – ESTIMATED COSTS City Project Developer ITEM No._______(1) Installed (2) Private (3) Total Street Construction* $769,183.53 $769,183.53 Stieg Road $531,098.41 Sanitary Sewer System $387,140.69 $387,140.69 Watermain System $461,411.92 $461,411.92 Storm Sewer System $541,939.20 $541,939.20 Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod $0 $0 Pond Construction $0 $0 Rain Garden $0 $0 Street and Traffic Control Signs $0 Sidewalk Improvements $0 Trail Improvements $0 $0 Landscaping $0 Street Lighting $0 Site Grading & Drainage Imp.** $723,625.00 $723,625.00 Setting Iron Monuments $0 $0 Tree Preservation and Reforestation $0 Wetland Buffer Monuments $0 SUB-TOTAL: $2,883,300.34 $2,883,300.34 Design, Admin, Insp, As-Builts (8%) $230,664.03 $230,664.03 Total: $3,113,964.37 $3,113,964.37 Total Project Cost $3,113,964.37 (1) Public Improvement/City Project. City to own and maintain after development complete. (2) Developer Installed Public Improvements. City to own and maintain after development complete. (3) Private - Property owner and/or property owners' association to maintain after development completed. *Street Construction includes costs for sidewalk and trail improvements **Note: If a grading permit was issued and the financial guarantee released and/or expired, these monies may be used for the required maintenance of the erosion and sediment control plan. 33. This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the city engineer or designee that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with city engineer or designee approval the security may be reduced from time to time by 75% of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the amounts certified by the - 12 – Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed; (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed; (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied; (4) the required "record" plans have been received by the City; (5) a warranty security is provided; and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 34. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Contract which must be furnished to the City at the time of final plat approval: Water Supply Trunk line area charge (TLAC) $ 141,086.56 Sanitary Sewer Trunk line area charge (TLAC) 93,101.00 Engineering Escrow 50,000.00 CSAH 101/Stieg Road Intersection Stieg Road Improvements 360,000.00 450,000.00 TOTAL CASH REQUIREMENTS LEVIED: $ 1,094,187.56 35. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC Attn: Chad Onsgard 7500 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite 670 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Corcoran City Hall, 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340. The Developer shall notify the City within five (5) days of change of address. CITY OF CORCORAN: BY: ______________________________________ Ron Thomas, Mayor (SEAL) AND _____________________________________ Brad Martens, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of ________________, 20____, by Ron Thomas and by Brad Martens, the mayor and city administrator of the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DEVELOPER: By: ______________________________________ Its: ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ________________, 20____, by __________________________________ the ____________________________________ of ______________________________________ on its behalf. ______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT _______________________________________________________, fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2_____. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _____________, 2____, by ______________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 MORTGAGE CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT _______________________________________________________, which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2_____. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2_____, by __________________________________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 CONTRACT PURCHASER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT _______________________________________________________________, which/who has a contract purchaser's interest in all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, hereby affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property in which there is a contract purchaser's interest. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2_____. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2____, by ____________________________________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 EXHIBIT “A” TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Legal Description of Property Being Final Platted as BELLWETHER 2ND ADDITION The South Two-thirds of the Southeast Quarter except road, Section One, Township One Hundred Nineteen, Range Twenty-three, Town of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND The south 292.70 feet of the west 595.12 feet of the north 1/3 of the East 1/2 of the Southeast Quarter, Section 1, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT “B” TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT APPROVING RESOLUTIONS Hennepin County Property Map Date: 3/27/2019 Comments: 1 inch = 1,600 feet No results This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019 Technical Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - To: Kevin Mattson, PE, Director of Public Works From: Kent Torve, P.E. City Engineer Nicholas Wyers Rowdy Schmidt Date: May 27, 2018 Subject: Bellwether 2nd Addition – Plan Review Pulte Homes submitted plans for the Bellwether 2nd Addition for City of Corcoran Review. Plans Dated January 23rd, 2019 have been received February 15th, 2019. 0.0 Phase 2 Overview • Stieg Road is on the City’s State Aid system. Design and construction will follow MSA standards. The phasing of construction and responsibility of portions of construction (City vs. Developer) are under discussion. The following comments are in reference to the submitted Phase 2 plans and will change based on review process and further discussions. o The platting process for Phase 2 will involve vacating existing ROW and this ROW process affects the Phase 2 coordination with private utilities, construction phasing and timing o Turn lanes at CSAH 101 will be reviewed by County o Trail will be built from Elm Lane intersection with Stieg Road to the west regional trail extension, to be coordinated with staff • City is now the WCA LGU although the PUD/Preliminary Plat for the entire development was approved under the Elm Creek WMO authority. Phase 2 will undergo a City-LGU wetland approval process which is now an integral portion within the City process of a development application. • Comments from the Preliminary Plat review still apply • Provide written responses to comments 1.0 Transportation These comments are related to the submitted plans and as noted above may change with subsequent modifications on the MSA process and responsibilities. Stieg Road 1.1 Install left/through/ right turn lanes on Stieg Road east bound at CSAH 101 1.2 Turn lanes may be required from Stieg Road to Elm Lane. Current transportation practices are trending to increasing protection for turning movements through installation of turn lanes. 1.3 Final plans will provide MSA cross section and associated details 1.4 Vertical alignment will be designed to meet 45 MPH road MSA standards Engineer’s Memo March 27, 2019 2 \\MSPFSV02\Studios\Planning & Urban Design Studio\City of Corcoran\COR19001 - Bellwether 2nd FP and Final PUD\2019-03-27 Engineer's memo Bellwether 2nd Addtion_Tuesday 3_26_KCT.docx 1.5 Submit grading information with sight lines for City to review sight distances at Stieg Road and CSAH 101 Elm Lane 1.6 Coordinate with City to improve Elm Lane alignments north of Stieg Road for through movements from south of Stieg Road 1.7 The island “nose” shall terminate at a point to match the end radii Future Commercial 1.8 City may require 300 feet distance (or more) from centerline of CSAH 101. Keep entrances out of turn lanes Misc. 1.9 Connect drain tile to upstream catch basins connect drain tile together wherever feasible to minimize cleanouts 1.10 Revise grades in the Fir Lane cul-de-sac for improved surface drainage 1.11 Provide elevations and grades on ped ramp details 1.12 Coordinate access to Schober parcel with Engineer. Future access to be from an internal street. 2.0 Trails 2.1 Trail alignment, cross section, and connections to be reviewed by City 3.0 Sewer 3.1 Sewer and water services to be installed 9’ beyond the ROW 3.2 Stub utilities to Outlot A and Outlot B to be 15’ beyond the ROW for future connections. 3.3 Service to Outlot B to be shown as perpendicular to main line to avoid bends 3.4 Relabel profile labeled “Elm Lane” to “102nd Place” on Sheet 13 3.5 Pipe from manhole MH T15 to MH 9 to be C900 DR 18 pipe due to depths being greater than 25’ 4.0 Water 4.1 Remove valve from Elm Lane near center median and install east of intersection on Stieg Road 4.1.1 Stub services to Outlot A and Outlot B perpendicular to mainline watermain to eliminate bends Engineer’s Memo March 27, 2019 3 \\MSPFSV02\Studios\Planning & Urban Design Studio\City of Corcoran\COR19001 - Bellwether 2nd FP and Final PUD\2019-03-27 Engineer's memo Bellwether 2nd Addtion_Tuesday 3_26_KCT.docx 4.1.2 Temp hydrants to be installed 15’ beyond ROW for future connections 4.2 Show existing watermain on south end of Elm Lane 4.3 Install temp hydrant at end of 102nd Place 4.4 C900 shall be used for all size pipes 4.5 Hydrant spacing to be reviewed by Public Safety 4.6 Extend northerly stub from west end of Stieg Road out of paved area for a future extension 4.6.1 Eliminate tail from plug on west end of Stieg Road 4.7 Install butterfly valve on Elm Lane near MH 6 to allow isolation of houses for maintenance or repair (currently shows 36 lots without an isolation valve) 4.8 Maintain 7.5 feet of cover at the end of 102nd Place 4.9 Lower watermain to eliminate high point at Station 7+00 on Elm Lane north of Stieg Road 5.0 Storm Sewer, Grading and Stormwater WCA • Stormwater routing and drainage will be reviewed along with the wetland approval for adequate hydrology and drainage patterns. Additional clarification will occur with subsequent reviews. Low Openings • Previous review of modeling and analysis had placed the HWL at 934.0 for Wetland #7, which places low opening at minimum of 936.0. Subsequent modeling for an emergency overflow to the northwest for back to back 100-year events has been performed. o As a result, the low opening around Wetland #7 has been revised upward to 936.5. A review of proposed elevations shows this affects very few structures, yet provides additional protection from extreme events o Design (pipe diameter, location, invert) will be provided in a separate memo and the EOF is not part of Phase 2 construction Off Site Impacts • Grading and drainage (EOF) toward Schober parcel is shown, an easement or other agreement will be required Temp Sed Basins • Additional temporary sedimentation basin information may need to be provided (for example on Outlots) Storm Sewer 5.1 Sumps required in the following structures 5.1.1 CBMHs 5, 10, 30, 53, 52, 36, 44, 47, and FES 49 and STMH 23 Engineer’s Memo March 27, 2019 4 \\MSPFSV02\Studios\Planning & Urban Design Studio\City of Corcoran\COR19001 - Bellwether 2nd FP and Final PUD\2019-03-27 Engineer's memo Bellwether 2nd Addtion_Tuesday 3_26_KCT.docx 5.2 Relocate CBMH 40 to property line 5.3 Relocate CBMH 51 outside of wetland buffer 5.4 Adjust D/U easement Lots 4, 5 and 6 of Block 5 to include draintile and drainage from Stieg Road 5.4.1 Resolve discrepancy with OCS 61 where an 18” outlet pipe invert is at 934.0 with the top of the outlet structure at 935.0 5.5 Maximize distance between Pond 3N inlet FES and outlet structure 5.6 Locate existing culvert near station 17+50 on Stieg Road. Potentially remove crossing, verify existing storm water drainage direction and drainage areas 5.7 Install CBs at end radii of 103rd Ave. Grading 5.8 Maintain drainage from existing homestead to the south at the west end of 102nd Place 5.9 Revise grading plan around Wetland #20 to accurately show grades 5.10 Label HWL and NWL on all wetlands 5.11 Revise XP SWMM model or plans to reflect accurate HWLs for Ponds 1N and 10N 5.12 Label EOF elevations 5.13 Provide more details on future sand filter east of Pond #2N 5.14 Lots 6 and 7 Block 5: Low opening is not 2’ above HP in rear yard drainage in Lot 8 Block 5. Provide details on EOF for this area 5.15 Revise low opening on the following lots to meet City freeboard requirements. HWL according to XP SWMM for Wetland 16 is 940.4 ▪ Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of Block 5 ▪ Lots along Wetland #20 need to have Low Opening 2 feet above EOF (street low point). ▪ All homes will be reviewed for City freeboard as the stormwater modeling and labeling is resubmitted. 5.16 Locate and label pond maintenance access bench for all ponds 5.17 Wetland #16: Provide additional information for offsite impacts/EOF 5.18 Provide more detail on grading, pond construction and tree clearing on Outlot A 5.19 Show all wetland outlet locations and drainage direction 5.20 Pond 6N does not have an inlet, provide additional information on drainage area 5.21 On site wetlands will have OCS for controlling elevation in accordance with WCA approval Engineer’s Memo March 27, 2019 5 \\MSPFSV02\Studios\Planning & Urban Design Studio\City of Corcoran\COR19001 - Bellwether 2nd FP and Final PUD\2019-03-27 Engineer's memo Bellwether 2nd Addtion_Tuesday 3_26_KCT.docx Stormwater Modeling 5.22 Submit updated electronic model and report 5.23 Pond 6N and Pond 3N are shown on plans as routed to south Wetland 7 5.24 Update all stormwater structures to match plans. For example: 5.24.1 The inlet pipe to OCS 61 is modeled with a slope of 0%. The plans have the inlet pipe at a slope of -2.22%. 5.24.2 The outlet pipe from OCS 61 is modeled with an upstream invert elevation of 934.0, downstream invert elevation of 932.0, and a length of 350’. The plans have the pipe at an upstream invert of 934.0, downstream invert of 932.8, and a length of 41.1’. 5.25 Expand XP SWMM model to include wetland north of Phase 2 and Wetland #19 in the existing and proposed conditions. These wetlands shall be included in the model to set proper downstream boundary conditions and to ensure freeboard requirements are satisfied. Stieg Road 5.26 Provide calculations showing Maximum Allowable Spread requirements for Minnesota State Aid funding are met using information outlined in the MNDOT Drainage Manual 6.0 Erosion Control 6.1 City of Corcoran is an MS4 city and site visits to be conducted weekly 6.2 Compliance with owner’s MS4 permit will be monitored 7.0 General 7.1 2019 detail plates to be incorporated in plan set 7.2 Existing utilities on Stieg Road to be coordinated with utility owners and City 7.3 Plat – Outlots A and J (north of Stieg) grading and utility construction to be coordinated with City. Temporary drainage may be necessary. 7.4 Confirm all wetland permitting is approved and in place 7.5 Make wetland numbering consistent with prior submittals and WCA approvals 7.5.1 Wetland #20 in the plan set was labeled as Wetland #21 in the SWMP 7.5.2 Wetland #21 in the plan set was labeled as Wetland #22 in the SWMP March 19, 2019 To: Kendra Lindahl, AICP City Planner City of Corcoran Re: Bellwether 2nd Addition – Wetland Waiver Request Dear Mrs. Lindahl, We are hereby, requesting a Wetland Waiver for the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Bellwether 2nd Addition. We are platting the entire 101 Farms Property but only buying and developing the SW corner which is approximately 4 acres. This 4 acre portion already has a wetland delineation completed and approved. The remaining 101 Farms property, Lot 1, Block 1 Bellwether 2nd Addition would need a wetland delineation when this property develops in the future. Please consider this request as you review the plat application of Bellwether 2nd Addition. Sincerely, Chad Onsgard Director of Development Pulte Homes 7500 Flying Cloud Drive Ste 670 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-936-7833 Fax: 952-936-7839 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 18, 2019 for the April 25, 2019 City Council Meeting RE: Final Plat and PUD Amendment for U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) for Ravinia 12th Addition (City File 19-002) 60-Day Review Deadline: May 13, 2019 1.Application Request Lennar submitted a request for approval of a final plat and PUD amendment for “Ravinia 12th Addition” to dedicate the remaining right of way for Gleason Parkway and an amendment to allow 65-foot wide lots containing the Landmark and 3-car Discovery homes in future phase 15 and the south portion of future phase 14. 2.Planning Commission The Planning Commission reviewed the PUD Amendment at their regularly scheduled meeting on April 4, 2019. The applicant was the only person to speak on the item. The Commissioners discussed the proposed amendment and had several questions, related to reducing the lot width, architecture and the protrusion of the garage on the front facades. Several Commissioners expressed concern about both the reduction in the lot size and the garage forward home design. After a lengthy discussion on what was acceptable for a garage protrusion, the Planning Commission voted 3-2 (nays Jacobs and Dickman) to recommend approval of the PUD Amendment with no revisions to staff’s recommendation. This recommendation would only allow construction of the Alexander model, which does not have a garage forward design. Information Submitted following the Planning Commission Following the Planning Commission meeting the applicant submitted floor plans for the proposed 3- car Discovery home models to show the protrusion of the garage. The applicant also provided the distance between the garage and the porch for the floor plans that were not provided. The table below summarizes the garage protrusion on the different models: Agenda Item: 8b. Final Plat and PUD Amendment – Ravinia 12th Addition (19-002) 2 April 25, 2019 Home Model Garage extension from front home elevation Garage extension from front porch elevation Alexander +/- 3 feet None Lewis 12 feet 6 feet Sullivan 15 feet 9 feet Hamilton 16 feet 10 feet Vanderbilt +/- 20 feet 12 feet Columbus +/- 24 feet 16 feet Hudson +/- 25 feet 17 feet The applicant submitted detailed floor plans and requested allowing home models with a garage extension no greater than 10 feet from the front porch elevation (Alexander, Lewis, Sullivan and Hamilton). Staff continues to recommend that only the Alexander be allowed for the 3-car Discovery units as it is only one that is not garage-forward. 3. Context Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a final PUD development plan is limited to whether the proposed plan is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary PUD development plan. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final PUD development plan. The City’s discretion in approving a final plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance and the conditions of preliminary plat approval. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat. Background The City Council approved the Ravinia rezoning to PUD (Planned Unit Development), Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Preliminary Plat on December 23, 2013. The Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat for Phase I was approved by City Council on April 24, 2014. There have been ten phases of Ravinia granted final approval and several PUD amendments since the 2014 approval. 4. Analysis of Request Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the approved preliminary plans, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report and resolution and the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo dated March 28, 2019. Staff has included a condition that the applicant must comply with the memo. Final Plat and PUD Amendment – Ravinia 12th Addition (19-002) 3 April 25, 2019 PUD Amendment Staff has included a table below which outlines the original unit mix approved in 2013, the current unit mix with approved amendments and the unit mix if this PUD amendment is approved. The table does not include the 20 55-foot lots added into the development with Ravinia 8th addition or the 14 55-foot lots added into the development with Ravinia 11th addition. These areas were included as additions to the original area approved. The 4th addition amendment introduced the 55-foot wide lots for two-car Discovery units, which were originally planned for 65-foot wide lots. These Discovery units were proposed by Lennar as a smaller, less expensive housing option. The 7th and 9th addition amendment included changing the approved lots from a mix of 65- and 75-foot wide lots to a mix of 55- and 65-foot wide lots. Lot Types (width) Original Approval Approved Amendments (4th, 7th and 9th) Proposed Amendment Discovery (55-foot) - 28 28 Lifestyle Villa Lots (60-foot) 38 22 19 Landmark Lots (65-foot) 131 186* 256 Classic Lots (75-foot) 257 206 142 Total 426 444 445 *Ravinia 9th addition introduced 3-car discovery units on the 65-foot lots. The applicant is requesting approval of a PUD amendment to allow 65-foot wide lots containing the Landmark and 3-car Discovery homes in future phase 15 and the south portion of future phase 14. These areas were originally approved for 75-foot wide lots with the Classic home product. The applicant has provided an exhibit showing the original approvals and the proposed amended plan. The difference between the original 2013 approvals and the proposed amendment is shown in the table below: Lot Types (width) Original Approval Proposed Amendment Lifestyle Villa Lots (60-foot) 22 19 Landmark/3-car Discovery Lots (65-foot) - 70 Classic Lots (75-foot) 66 - Total 88 89 The table shows the different elevations by home type. Discovery (3-car) Landmark Classic Final Plat and PUD Amendment – Ravinia 12th Addition (19-002) 4 April 25, 2019 The original approvals for Ravinia in 2013 set forth certain architectural and design standards in the approvals as outlined below: PUD flexibility is provided to allow the face of the garage to exceed 55% of the building face. In exchange for this flexibility: a. Garage door colors shall be compatible with the building colors. b. Architectural elements shall be added above the garage to de-emphasize the garage doors. c. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled to match the exterior of the home. As part of the original submittal, Lennar asked for this garage flexibility but noted that their home design would minimize the impact of the garage. Their narrative noted: The concept for this project was to reduce the dominance of the garage. Unfortunately, only one of the three-car garage Discovery units have garages at or behind the front elevation. Staff believes that minimizing garages is still a priority. We have prepared a resolution that allows the change from the Classic unit to the Landmark unit and limits the addition of the 3-car Discovery unit to only those that have garages located at or behind the front elevation of the home (the Alexander). However, the City Council should discuss and could come to a different conclusion. Final Plat The applicant is requesting approval of a final plat to create two outlots and dedicate the remaining right of way for Gleason Parkway. They are also planning to grade the areas included in the 12th addition. The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Final Plat and PUD Amendment – Ravinia 12th Addition (19-002) 5 April 25, 2019 Conclusion Staff has reviewed the plan for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the preliminary approvals, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. 5. Recommendation Move to adopt the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: 1. Resolution 2019-33 approving the PUD Amendment 2. Resolution 2019-34 approving the Final Plat and Development Contract Attachments a. Resolution 2019-33 approving the PUD Amendment b. Resolution 2019-34 approving the Final Plat and Development Contract c. Draft Development Contract d. Location Map e. Engineer Memo dated March 5, 2019 f. Final Plat dated February 19, 2019 g. PUD Amendment Exhibit dated February 19, 2019 h. Overall Density Exhibit dated March 13, 2019 i. Grading Plan dated February 19, 2019 j. Elevations and Floor Plans dated March 7, 2019 City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-33 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT FOR “RAVINIA 14TH AND 15th ADDITION” FOR THE LENNAR CORPORATION (PID 36-119-23-24-0002) (CITY FILE 19-002) WHEREAS, The Lennar Corporation (“the applicant”) has requested approval of an amendment to the PUD standards related to the unit types planned for Ravinia 14th and 15th Addition, on a portion of the land legally described as: Outlot A, Ravinia 5th Addition WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a public meeting and recommends approval, and; WHEREAS, the applicant has indicated that the market has changed and they would like to offer a mix of 60- and 65-foot wide lots in these phases; WHEREAS, the applicant will comply with all other PUD approvals: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a PUD amendment, subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of the preliminary approvals in Resolutions 2013-60 and 2013-61 remain in place and must be met, except as modified by this resolution. 2. All conditions of the final approvals in Resolution 2014-20 and 2014-21 remain in place and must be met, except as modified by this resolution. 3. The portion of land included in the PUD amendment shall be the land shown on the PUD Amendment plan dated February 19, 2019. 4. A PUD amendment is approved allowing a mix of 60- and 65-lots in accordance with the application materials and plans received by the City on February 19, 2019 and revised materials received on March 13, 2019, except as amended by this resolution. 5. The 65-foot lots are approved for all of the Landmark home types and limited to the three- car Discovery home types that have the garages located at or behind the front elevation of the home. 6. All platted lots shall comply with the approved Ravinia development standards. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-33 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-34 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR “RAVINIA 12TH ADDITION” FOR LENNAR CORPORATION (PID 36-119-23-24-0002) (CITY FILE 19-002) WHEREAS, The Lennar Corporation (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a final plat dedicating the right of way for Gleason Parkway on property legally described as: Outlot A, Ravinia And Outlot B, Ravinia 5th Addition The registered portion being that part of Outlot B, Ravinia 5th Addition, embraced within Lot 1, Block 1, Farrell 2nd Addition And Outlot A, Ravinia 9th Addition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a final plat; and; FURTHER, that the development contract for said plat shall be completed by city staff and the Mayor and that the City Administrator be authorized to execute the development contract on behalf of the City; and FURTHER, that the approval is granted based on the following findings and conditions: 1. A final plat is approved to allow the right of way dedication for Gleason Parkway in accordance with the application materials and plans received by the City on February 19, 2019 and revisions received on March 13, 2019, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Development is subject to the Ravinia preliminary approvals and amendments, except as otherwise amended. 3. The developer must submit a final plat for each future phase of development. No final approvals are granted at this time for future phases. 4. The development contract must be executed by the developer and the City and must be filed with the final plat. 5. Park dedication was calculated for the entire development. No park dedication is due with this phase. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-34 Page 2 of 3 6. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo, dated March 5, 2019. 7. An emergency access must be provided to Hunter Lane. 8. The following conditions must be met prior to release of the final plat for recording: a. A landscape plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City. b. A lighting plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City. c. A final tree preservation plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City. d. Cost estimates are required for landscaping to finalize the development contract. 9. The following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: a. The applicant must file the final plat at Hennepin County within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. b. The applicant must record the approving resolutions and associated documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. c. Wetland buffer monument signs must be purchased from the City and installed by the applicant in accordance with the standards in Section 1050.010. d. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plan drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. 10. The following conditions be met prior to release of remaining escrow: a. Lot corner monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. As part of the development contract, a financial guarantee shall be required as part of the development contract to ensure installation per city requirements. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-34 Page 3 of 3 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) RAVINIA 12TH ADDITION CONTRACT dated ____________________, 2019, by and between the CITY OF CORCORAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) (the “Developer”). This is an amendment to the Ravinia Development Contract dated June 12, 2014 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for Ravinia 12th Addition (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described in Exhibit A. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer shall enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat upon City approval with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Unless separate written approval has been given by the City, within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat, development contract and other associated documents have been recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office and proof of recording has been provided to the City, and 4) the City has issued written notice that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. However, the Developer may be allowed to begin grading the site when items 1, 2 and 4 of the previous sentence have been satisfied. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has failed to fulfill all obligations in this Contract and the failure has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Park charges and area charges for sewer and water referred to in this Contract are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the plat that are designated in an approved preliminary plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are final platted into lots and blocks. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within nine (9) years after preliminary plat approval. - 2 – 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For nine (9) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Exhibit A – Legal Description Plan A – Final Plat, dated 2/19/19 Plan B – Final Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan, dated 2/19/19 Plan C – Final Tree Preservation and Reforestation Plan, dated _____ Plan D – Storm Sewer Plan, dated 2/19/19 Plan E – Sewer and Watermain Plan, dated 2/19/19 Plan F – Final Street Plan, dated 2/19/19 8. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for all of the following improvements: • Streets • Watermain • Surface Water Facilities (pipe, ponds, rain gardens, etc.) • Grading and Erosion Control • Sidewalks/Trails • Street Lighting • Underground Utilities • Street Signs and Traffic Control Signs • Tree Preservation • Wetland Mitigation and Buffers The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the city engineer or designee. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide full-time field inspection personnel in order for the Developer's engineer to be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer and/or the Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his or her engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at City Hall with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. All labor and work shall be done and performed in the best and most workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No deviations from the approved plans and specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the city engineer or designee. The - 3 – Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors being considered for retention by the Developer for the performance of the work required by the contract. The Developer shall not do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this contract, for which reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is first approved in writing by the city engineer or designee. The Developer shall be responsible for construction of all improvements in conformance with the approved plans and specs. 9. CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Commission members, and corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such individuals have greater than a 25% ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 8 above. 10. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: • Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains/Wells • NPDES Permits • Watershed Permits 11. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements in this phase by October 31, 2019, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on streets. The City will not accept new public streets in phase I until 80% of the homes in phase I have received a certificate of occupancy and the streets have weathered a full winter season. Final wear course placement outside of this time frame must have the written approval of the City Engineer. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 12. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 13. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress for grading, public utility construction, and street construction is restricted to access the subdivision via Gleason Parkway. No construction traffic is permitted on other adjacent local streets. 14. GRADING PLAN. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading drainage and erosion control plan, Plan "B". The plan shall conform to City of Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. 15. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. Erosion control practices must comply with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s Best Management Practices. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All erosion control shall comply with Section 950 (Erosion Control) of the Corcoran City Code and the Corcoran Engineering - 4 – Design Standards. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 16. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on the same and to direct attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the event residences are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage to ensure that the streets are passable to traffic and emergency vehicles. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the subdivision swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill, track, or wash onto the street from Developer’s operation. 17. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract and acceptance of the work by the City, the improvements lying within public easements or right-of-way shall become City property. Prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits: • Contractor’s Certificate • Engineer’s Certificate • Land Surveyor’s Certificate 18. PARK DEDICATION. Park dedication is based on the development of the entire Ravinia site and shall be land dedication totaling 32.12 net acres, due at the time of final plat for the phases that include public park dedication. No park dedication is proposed or accepted with this phase. 19. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS/TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS. Street name signs shall be installed by the Developer in accordance with the City of Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. The Developer shall install traffic control signs in accordance with the plan approved by the City Engineer and Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. All signs must be installed prior to final building inspection approval or earlier if necessary as determined by the City Engineer. 20. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION AND OPERATION COSTS. The developer shall pay for and install all street lights. The street light shall be of a design approved by the City. The developer shall be responsible for street light operation and maintenance costs until such time as the City accepts the public street where the streetlights are located. After the acceptance the City shall be responsible for all costs, subject to the street lighting policy. The costs of operation are dependent upon the operation costs for Wright Hennepin Electric under contract franchise with the City of Corcoran. 21. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. The City may require Developer to post funds in an escrow account, at its discretion. In the event the cash escrow amount is insufficient, Developer shall post additional escrow funds as - 5 – determined by the City Planner within ten (10) days of written demand. Failure to make payment of the additional escrow amount shall permit the City to supplement those amounts from any other sureties posted by Developer. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this contract. This is a personal obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 22. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Compliance with the conditions of the original approvals, PUD Amendments, including the PUD Amendment (Resolution 2019-33) and Final Plat approval (Resolution 2019-34), which are attached as Exhibit B. B. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall convey the Park to the City by warranty deed, free and clear of any and all encumbrances. Before the City signs the final plat, the developer shall convey the required trail easements to the City in a form satisfactory to the City C. The Developer shall supply a complete set of the approved construction plans in an AutoCAD.DWG electronic file format before the preconstruction conference. D. The Developer shall include the “City of Corcoran’s Standard Detail Specifications” (all applicable sections) in the contract documents of their improvement project. 23. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in conjunction with a sale of the entire land, the Developer may, without the consent of the City, assign this Contract to a limited liability company or other entity in - 6 – which the Developer or an affiliate thereof has a controlling membership or other controlling ownership interest, provided that such assignee assumes in writing the obligations of Developer under this Contract. B. Appropriate legal documents including, but not limited to, those regarding Homeowner Association documents, conservation easements, covenants and restrictions, as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final Plat. C. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given thirty (30) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The insurance shall be primary and non-contributory as to any policy maintained by the City. D. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. E. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for failure to fulfill any of the foregoing covenants. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, - 7 – zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 24. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 25. WARRANTY/PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit or performance bond for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to one (1) year from the date of final written acceptance, unless the wearing course is placed during the same construction season as the bituminous base course. In those instances, the subdivider shall guarantee all work, including street construction, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, material and equipment for a period of two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one full growing season following installation. Following construction, a certification signed by the design landscape architect shall be filed with the City evidencing that the was installed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. 26. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in a form acceptable to the City, from a bank, cash escrow or a combination cash escrow and Letter of Credit ("security") for $1,283,426.69, which represents 100 percent of the estimated cost of the Improvements. The letter of credit shall include an automatic renewal clause. The letter of credit shall guarantee to the City the construction and satisfactory completion of all items to be completed by the developer; that the letter of credit shall be reduced from time to time as work is performed and accepted in a satisfactory manner; that the city engineer may reduce the letter of credit to the amount reasonably estimated by the City engineer to be necessary to cover the remaining construction obligations; however, the letter of credit shall not be reduced below the amount estimated - 8 – by the City to cover all obligations of development including payment of costs and expenses incurred by the City for legal, engineering, planning and any other costs until a maintenance bond for period of one year, satisfactory to the city attorney and the city engineer has been provided by the developer or its subcontractor. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: - 9 – ESTIMATED COSTS City Project Developer ITEM No._______(1) Installed (2) Private (3) Total Street Construction* $284,519.00 $284,519.00 Sanitary Sewer System $0 Watermain System $28,275.00 $28,275.00 Storm Sewer System $97,960.50 $97,960.50 Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod $0 $0 Pond Construction $0 $0 Rain Garden $0 $0 Street and Traffic Control Signs $0 Sidewalk Improvements $0 Trail Improvements $0 $0 Landscaping $TBD Street Lighting $0 Site Grading & Drainage Imp.** $777,603.55 $777,603.55 Setting Iron Monuments $0 $0 Tree Preservation and Reforestation $0 Wetland Buffer Monuments $0 SUB-TOTAL: $1,188,358.05 Design, Admin, Insp, As-Builts (8%) $95,068.64 Total: $1,283,426,.69 Total Project Cost $1,283,426.69 (1) Public Improvement/City Project. City to own and maintain after development complete. (2) Developer Installed Public Improvements. City to own and maintain after development complete. (3) Private - Property owner and/or property owners' association to maintain after development completed. *Street Construction includes costs for sidewalk and trail improvements **Note: If a grading permit was issued and the financial guarantee released and/or expired, these monies may be used for the required maintenance of the erosion and sediment control plan. 27. This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the city engineer or designee that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with city engineer or designee approval the security may be reduced from time to time by 75% of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed; (2) - 10 – iron monuments for lot corners have been installed; (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied; (4) the required "record" plans have been received by the City; (5) a warranty security is provided; and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 28. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Corcoran City Hall, 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340. The Developer shall notify the City within five (5) days of change of address. CITY OF CORCORAN: BY: ______________________________________ Ron Thomas, Mayor (SEAL) AND _____________________________________ Brad Martens, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of ________________, 20____, by Ron Thomas and by Brad Martens, the mayor and city administrator of the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DEVELOPER: By: ______________________________________ Its: ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ________________, 20____, by __________________________________ the ____________________________________ of ______________________________________ on its behalf. ______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT _______________________________________________________, fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2_____. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _____________, 2____, by ______________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 MORTGAGE CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT _______________________________________________________, which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2_____. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2_____, by __________________________________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 CONTRACT PURCHASER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT _______________________________________________________________, which/who has a contract purchaser's interest in all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, hereby affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property in which there is a contract purchaser's interest. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2_____. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2____, by ____________________________________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 EXHIBIT “A” TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Legal Description of Property Being Final Platted as RAVINIA 12TH ADDITION Outlot A, Ravinia And Outlot B, Ravinia 5th Addition The registered portion being that part of Outlot B, Ravinia 5th Addition, embraced within Lot 1, Block 1, Farrell 2nd Addition And Outlot A, Ravinia 9th Addition EXHIBIT “B” TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT APPROVING RESOLUTIONS Henn e p in Co u nty Prop erty Map Da te : 3/2 9/2019 Com ments: 1 inc h = 4 00 feet PAR C EL ID: 36 11923240002 OWN ER N AME: U S H ome Corporat ion PAR C EL AD DR ESS: 5 2 Addres s Unas s igned, C or c ora n MN 00000 PAR C EL AR EA: 41 .63 a cr es , 1,813,475 sq ft A-T-B: Bot h SAL E PR ICE: $5,000,000 SAL E D ATA: 09/2016 SAL E C OD E: Va cant Land ASSESSED 2 018 , PAYABLE 2019 PR OPERT Y TYPE: Vac an t Land-Residential H OM ESTEAD : N on-Homest ead M AR KET VAL UE: $1,832,000 TAX TO TAL: $3 1,630.16 ASSESSED 2 019 , PAYABLE 2020 PRO PER TY TYPE: Unavailable HO MESTEAD: Unavailable MARKET VALU E: U navailable This dat a (i) is fur nished 'AS IS' wit h no represent at ion as t o com plet enes s or acc ura cy ; (ii) is furnis hed with no war rant y of an y k ind; an d (i ii) is not s uit able for lega l, engi neering or s urv ey ing purpos es . Hen nepin C ounty s hall not be liable f or any damage, in jury o r los s r esu lt ing f rom t his data. CO PYRIG HT © HENNEPIN CO UN TY 20 19 Technical Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - To: Kevin Mattson, PE, Director of Public Works From: Kent Torve, P.E. Nicholas Wyers Rowdy Schmidt Date: March 5th, 2019 Subject: Ravinia – 12th Addition Plan Review Lennar submitted plans for the Ravinia development 12th Addition for City of Corcoran review. Plans dated February 19th, 2019 have been received February 22nd, 2019 for the proposed Ravinia development. The following comments are regarding the plans submitted and should be considered and addressed. Provide written responses to comments. 1.0 Transportation 1.1 Provide emergency access to Hunter Road. 1.2 City is designing Gleason Parkway Extension on existing 66th Street. Modifications may be required at tie-in elevation. Coordinate with Engineer. 1.3 Revise vertical curves to meet Minnesota State Aid standards for 35 MPH road 1.4 Between Parkway and Hunter Lane, proposed wall may not have enough room to install blvd, trail and retaining wall. Provide details showing cross section and spacing for right of way along Hunter Lane 2.0 Trails 2.1 Trail in Phase 13 on Prairie Sage Lane – verify need, location/termination point 3.0 Sewer 3.1 Trunk sewer off Phase 13. Provide more detail with phase 13 utility submittal. 4.0 Water 4.1 Show existing watermain from Phase 9 4.2 Connect watermain to existing 8”. Install tee to Annablle Lane from parkway instead of 45 bends. 4.3 Stub water to Hunter Road in the same area as sanitary sewer, provide more detail with Phase 13 utility submittal. 4.4 Stub watermain from gleason parkway to Hunter Road Turnaround 5.0 Grading and Stormwater Grading 5.1 How to address drainage and retaining wall along wetland #1 crossing? 5.2 Retaining walls on Phase 13, material, elevations, details, etc Engineer’s Memo March 5, 2019 2 \\MSPFSV02\Studios\Planning & Urban Design Studio\City of Corcoran\COR19002 - Ravinia 12th FP and Final PUD\Engineer Review 1_2019_0305.docx 5.2.1 Retaining walls required to be on private property, encroachment agreement needed when retaining walls within City Right of Way 5.3 Retaining walls for Gleason Parkway. 5.3.1 Encroachment agreement needed on retaining walls within City Right of Way 5.4 Provide more details for retaining walls 5.5 Label all EOF with elevations 5.6 Temporary drainage required at all low points to keep water from pooling in road subgrade 5.7 Review retaining wall in phase 15 along Park Trail Road 5.8 Pond is being graded into wetland #10 buffer 5.9 Provide pond maintenance access routes Storm Sewer 5.10 Label all storm sewer structures 5.11 STMH 35 appears to reference existing grade. 5.12 Is it feasible to pipe water from Pond on Black Oak Lane to west Wetland #3? Stormwater Modeling 5.13 Submit stormwater model 5.14 Submit SWMP 6.0 Erosion Control 6.1 City of Corcoran is an MS4 city and site visits to be conducted weekly. 6.2 Compliance with owner’s MS4 permit will be monitored. 7.0 General 7.1 Plans to include most recent City of Corcoran detail plates LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Alexander • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 16305 36th Ave. N. Suite 600, Plymouth, MN 55446 Elevations of a home may vary and we reserve the right to substitute and /or modify design and materials, in our sole opinion and without notice. Please see your New Home Consultant and home purchase agreement for actual features designated as an Everything’s Included feature, additional information, disclosures, and disclaimers relating to your home and its features. Plans are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the right to make changes to plans and elevations without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, regarding “under air” or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate certainty. Garage sizes may vary from home to home and may not accommodate all vehicles. Visit Lennar.com or see a Lennar New Home Consultant for further details and important legal disclaimers. This is not an offer in states where prior registration is required. Void where prohibited by law. †Source - BATC, 2015 Top 25 Builders List. Copyright © 2017 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar – License No. 20464871. Lennar Sales Corp. – Broker. MN Bldr. Lic # BC001413. (10500) 4/3/17 Main Level Upper Level 2,443 Sq. Ft. • 2 Stories • 4 Bedrooms • 3 Bathrooms • 3 Car Garage LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Alexander • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 A C B D 2 Stories | 4 Bedrooms | 3 Bathrooms | 3 Car Garage 2,443 Sq. Ft. LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Lewis • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 16305 36th Ave. N. Suite 600, Plymouth, MN 55446 Elevations of a home may vary and we reserve the right to substitute and /or modify design and materials, in our sole opinion and without notice. Please see your New Home Consultant and home purchase agreement for actual features designated as an Everything’s Included feature, additional information, disclosures, and disclaimers relating to your home and its features. Plans are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the right to make changes to plans and elevations without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, regarding “under air” or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate certainty. Garage sizes may vary from home to home and may not accommodate all vehicles. Visit Lennar.com or see a Lennar New Home Consultant for further details and important legal disclaimers. This is not an offer in states where prior registration is required. Void where prohibited by law. †Source - BATC, 2015 Top 25 Builders List. Copyright © 2017 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar – License No. 20464871. Lennar Sales Corp. – Broker. MN Bldr. Lic # BC001413. (10499) 4/3/17 FIRST FLOOR OP T . FIR E P L A C E OP T . BE N C H PANTRY DN DN REF. OPT.DOORS OP T . WI N D O W OP T . WI N D O W DW MUDROOM PWDR W.I.C. FAMILYROOM DININGROOM KITCHEN 3 CAR GARAGE FOYER PORCH FLEXROOM UP 16' x 17' 11' x 10' 12' x 13' 29' x 21' 12' x 13' DN OP T . SI N K OPT.SINK OPT. BOXVAULT LINEN LA U N D R Y BATH2 W.I.C. W.I.C. W.I.C.W.I.C. BEDROOM 4 OWNER'S SUITE BEDROOM 2BEDROOM 3 LOFT OPT.W OPT.D 11' x 12' 12' x 10' 12' x 14'11' x 12' 15' x 16' OWNER'S BATH Main Level Upper Level 2,692 Sq. Ft. • 2 Stories • 4 Bedrooms • 3 Bathrooms • 3 Car Garage LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Lewis • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 A C B D 2 Stories | 4 Bedrooms | 3 Bathrooms | 3 Car Garage 2,692 Sq. Ft. LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Sullivan • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 16305 36th Ave. N. Suite 600, Plymouth, MN 55446 Elevations of a home may vary and we reserve the right to substitute and /or modify design and materials, in our sole opinion and without notice. Please see your New Home Consultant and home purchase agreement for actual features designated as an Everything’s Included feature, additional information, disclosures, and disclaimers relating to your home and its features. Plans are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the right to make changes to plans and elevations without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, regarding “under air” or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate certainty. Garage sizes may vary from home to home and may not accommodate all vehicles. Visit Lennar.com or see a Lennar New Home Consultant for further details and important legal disclaimers. This is not an offer in states where prior registration is required. Void where prohibited by law. †Source - BATC, 2015 Top 25 Builders List. Copyright © 2017 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar – License No. 20464871. Lennar Sales Corp. – Broker. MN Bldr. Lic # BC001413.(19568) 7/27/17 Main Level Upper Level 2,050 Sq. Ft. • 2 Stories • 3 Bedrooms • 2.5 Bathrooms • 3 Car Garage LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Sullivan • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 A C B D 2 Stories | 3 Bedrooms | 2.5 Bathrooms | 3 Car Garage 2,050 Sq. Ft. LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Hamilton • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 16305 36th Ave. N. Suite 600, Plymouth, MN 55446 Elevations of a home may vary and we reserve the right to substitute and /or modify design and materials, in our sole opinion and without notice. Please see your New Home Consultant and home purchase agreement for actual features designated as an Everything’s Included feature, additional information, disclosures, and disclaimers relating to your home and its features. Plans are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the right to make changes to plans and elevations without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, regarding “under air” or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate certainty. Garage sizes may vary from home to home and may not accommodate all vehicles. Visit Lennar.com or see a Lennar New Home Consultant for further details and important legal disclaimers. This is not an offer in states where prior registration is required. Void where prohibited by law. †Source - BATC, 2015 Top 25 Builders List. Copyright © 2017 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar – License No. 20464871. Lennar Sales Corp. – Broker. MN Bldr. Lic # BC001413. (10501) 4/3/17 FIRST FLOOR OP T . CO U N T E R TO P OPT. D PANTRY DW RE F . OPT.BENCH UP DN OP T . F I R E P L A C E MUD ROOM PWDR L A U N D R Y W.I.C. FOYER 3 CAR GARAGE PORCH FLEXROOM GREATROOM DINING ROOM KITCHEN OPT. W O P T . S I N K 18' x 15' 15' x 10' 15' x 8' 31' x 21' 11' x 12' LINEN DN OPT. BOX CLG. OPT. BOX VALULT BATH 2 W.I.C. W.I.C. W.I.C. W.I.C. OWNER'S SUITE BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 4 BEDROOM 3 OPT. SINK 11' x 12' 11' x 12' 14' x 15' 11' x 12' OWNER'S BATH Main Level Upper Level 2,450 Sq. Ft. • 2 Stories • 4 Bedrooms • 3 Bathrooms • 3 Car Garage LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Hamilton • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 A C B D 2 Stories | 4 Bedrooms | 3 Bathrooms | 3 Car Garage 2,450 Sq. Ft. LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Vanderbilt • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 16305 36th Ave. N. Suite 600, Plymouth, MN 55446 Elevations of a home may vary and we reserve the right to substitute and /or modify design and materials, in our sole opinion and without notice. Please see your New Home Consultant and home purchase agreement for actual features designated as an Everything’s Included feature, additional information, disclosures, and disclaimers relating to your home and its features. Plans are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the right to make changes to plans and elevations without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, regarding “under air” or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate certainty. Garage sizes may vary from home to home and may not accommodate all vehicles. Visit Lennar.com or see a Lennar New Home Consultant for further details and important legal disclaimers. This is not an offer in states where prior registration is required. Void where prohibited by law. †Source - BATC, 2015 Top 25 Builders List. Copyright © 2017 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar – License No. 20464871. Lennar Sales Corp. – Broker. MN Bldr. Lic # BC001413. (10502) 5/25/17 OPT.BENCH OP T. FIR E P L ACE PANTRY UP DW RE F. COATS MUDROOM PWDR W.I.C. FLEXROOM GREATROOM NOOK KITCHEN FOYER PORCH 3 CAR GARAGE DN 17' x 17' 10' x 13' 11' x 13' 31' x 21' 11' x 13' 2,271 Sq. Ft. • 2 Stories • 4 Bedrooms • 3 Bathrooms • 3 Car Garage Main Level Upper Level LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Vanderbilt • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 A C B D 2 Stories | 4 Bedrooms | 3 Bathrooms | 3 Car Garage 2,271 Sq. Ft. LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Columbus • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 16305 36th Ave. N. Suite 600, Plymouth, MN 55446 Elevations of a home may vary and we reserve the right to substitute and /or modify design and materials, in our sole opinion and without notice. Please see your New Home Consultant and home purchase agreement for actual features designated as an Everything’s Included feature, additional information, disclosures, and disclaimers relating to your home and its features. Plans are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the right to make changes to plans and elevations without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, regarding “under air” or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate certainty. Garage sizes may vary from home to home and may not accommodate all vehicles. Visit Lennar.com or see a Lennar New Home Consultant for further details and important legal disclaimers. This is not an offer in states where prior registration is required. Void where prohibited by law. †Source - BATC, 2015 Top 25 Builders List. Copyright © 2017 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar – License No. 20464871. Lennar Sales Corp. – Broker. MN Bldr. Lic # BC001413. (10503) 4/3/17 GREAT ROOM17' x 17' 9' x 13' 10' x 14' 11' x 12' NOOK FLEX ROOM FOYER PORCH KITCHEN 3 CAR GARAGE 29' x 21' W.I.C. PWDR. MUD ROOM OPT. DOORS OP T . WI N D O W OP T . WI N D O W CL O S E T UP DN OP T . FIR E P L A C E DW PANTRY RE F . LINEN BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 4 OWNER'S SUITE BEDROOM 2 W.I.C. BATH OPT. TRAY CLG. OPT.W DN OPT.D LA U N D R Y 10' x 10'11' x 10' 11' x 10' 12' x 13' OPT. BOX VAULT OPT.SINK OWNER'S BATH Main Level Upper Level 2,148 Sq. Ft. • 2 Stories • 4 Bedrooms • 3 Bathrooms • 3 Car Garage LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Columbus • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 A C B D 2 Stories | 4 Bedrooms | 3 Bathrooms | 3 Car Garage 2,148 Sq. Ft. LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Hudson • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 16305 36th Ave. N. Suite 600, Plymouth, MN 55446 Elevations of a home may vary and we reserve the right to substitute and /or modify design and materials, in our sole opinion and without notice. Please see your New Home Consultant and home purchase agreement for actual features designated as an Everything’s Included feature, additional information, disclosures, and disclaimers relating to your home and its features. Plans are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the right to make changes to plans and elevations without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, regarding “under air” or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate certainty. Garage sizes may vary from home to home and may not accommodate all vehicles. Visit Lennar.com or see a Lennar New Home Consultant for further details and important legal disclaimers. This is not an offer in states where prior registration is required. Void where prohibited by law. †Source - BATC, 2015 Top 25 Builders List. Copyright © 2017 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar – License No. 20464871. Lennar Sales Corp. – Broker. MN Bldr. Lic # BC001413.(20989) 10/3/17 Main Level Upper Level 1,817 Sq. Ft. 2 Stories 3 Bedrooms 2.5 Bathrooms 3 Car Garage LENNAR.COM LENNAR®The Hudson • 3-Car Discovery Collection 952-249-3000 A C B D 2 Stories | 3 Bedrooms | 2.5 Bathrooms | 3 Car Garage 1,817 Sq. Ft. Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 DATE April 23, 2019 FROM Kendra Lindahl; Kevin Shay TO Brad Martens CC RE Ravinia Project History The following is a chronological history of the Ravinia project: • Ravinia (city file 13-025): Lennar submitted an application for Preliminary PUD Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to allow 426 single family homes on 266.57 acres. These applications were heard at the Parks and Trails Commission on November 19, 2013, the Planning Commission on December 5, 2013 and approved by the City Council on December 23, 2013. • Ravinia Phase 1 (city file 14-003): Lennar submitted an application for Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat to create 38 lots and 5 outlots. The final PUD application was heard at the Parks and Trails Commission in April 2014 and the Planning Commission in April 2014. Both applications were approved at the City Council meeting on April 2014. • Ravinia PUD Amendment (city file 14-034): Lennar submitted an application for a PUD Amendment to allow vinyl siding and a 5-foot side setback for living space on the garage side. Initial approvals were for LP siding and a 7.5 – 10 feet side setback for living space depending on the lot size. The amendment was approved by the City Council in January of 2015. Planning Commission did not review. • Ravinia Phase 2 (city file 15-003): Lennar submitted an application for Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat to allow 36 single family homes. The applications were presented at the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council in April of 2015. • Ravinia Phase 3 (city file 15-007): Lennar submitted an application for Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat to allow 27 single family homes. The applications were presented at the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council in June of 2015. • Ravinia Phase 4 (city file 16-004): Lennar submitted an application for Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat to allow 44 single family homes. The request to allow 55-foot wide lots for 2-car Discovery homes where 60- foot wide lots where originally approved for Lifestyle villa homes was part of this application. The applications were presented at the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council in April of 2016. • Ravinia Phase 5 and 6 (city file 16-015 and 16-016): Lennar submitted an application for Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat to allow 47 single family homes in phase 5 and 23 single family homes in phase 6. The applications were presented at the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council in July of 2016. • Ravinia Phase 8 (city file 16-026): Lennar submitted an application for Preliminary PUD Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to allow 21 single family homes on 5.97 acres. This land was not included in the original Ravinia development and added to the project. The application was presented to the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council in November of 2016. • Ravinia PUD Amendment (city file 16-030): Lennar submitted an application for a PUD amendment to modify the 7th Addition from a mix of 65- and 75-foot wide lots (Landmark and Classic) to a mix of 55- and 65-foot wide lots (Landmark and Discovery). The 7th addition would eventually be broken into what is now the 7th Addition and 9th Addition. Lennar also requested approval to expand the grading limits with this phase. The amendment was presented at the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council in December of 2016. After approving 55-foot wide lots, Lennar only platted 65-foot wide lots in the 7th and 9th addition. Memorandum 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net MEMORANDUM 2 • Ravinia Phase 7 (city file 17-013): Lennar submitted an application for Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat to allow 36 single family Landmark homes. Lennar did not execute the approval allowing 55-foot wide lots and only platted 65-foot wide lots with the 7th Addition. The applications were presented at the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council in July of 2017. • Ravinia Phase 8 (city file 17-002): Lennar submitted an application for Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat to allow 20 single family 2-car Discovery homes on 55-foot wide lots. The applications were presented at the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council in March of 2017. • Ravinia Phase 9 (city file 17-042): Lennar submitted an application for Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat to allow 49 single family homes on 65-foot wide lots for 3-car Discovery and Landmark units. Lennar did not execute the approval allowing 55-foot wide lots and only platted 65-foot wide lots with the 9th Addition. Lennar also requested a PUD Amendment related to landscaping standards and signage. The applications were presented at the Planning Commission in February and approved by the City Council in March of 2018. The focus of the discussion at these meetings was centered around the landscaping and signage amendments requested and the allowance of Discovery units on the 65-foot wide lots was not discussed. • Ravinia Phase 10 (city file 18-034): Lennar submitted an application for Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat to allow 26 single family homes. The applications were presented at the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council in November of 2018. • Ravinia Phase 11 (city file 18-040): Lennar submitted an application for Preliminary PUD Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to allow 15 single family 2-car Discovery homes on 5.59 acres. This was proposed as an addition to the original Ravinia subdivision. The application was presented to the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council in February of 2019. • Ravinia Phase 11 (city file 19-005): Lennar submitted an application for Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat to allow 14 single family homes with a mix of 2-car and 3-car Discovery homes. The applications are planned to be presented at the Planning Commission and City Council in May of 2019. • Ravinia Phase 12 (city file 19-002): Lennar submitted an application for PUD Amendment and Final Plat to dedicate the remaining Gleason Parkway right of way and modify the 14th and 15th addition to allow 65-foot wide lots where 75-foot wide lots were originally approved. The applications were presented at the Planning Commission on April 4, 2019 and are expected to be acted on by the City Council on April 25, 2019. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: JP Mansolf through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 18, 2019 for the April 25, 2019 City Council Meeting RE: PUD Sketch Plan for Cook Lake Corcoran (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (city file 19-007) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:June 10, 2019 1.Application Request Trek Development, Inc. and United Properties have submitted a request to the City to review a Planned Unit Development (PUD) sketch plan for a 98-100 unit senior co-op apartments, attached twin or townhome units and 19 single family homes on 27.31 gross acres at 19220 CR 10. 2.Context Background The Council reviewed a sketch plan from this developer in May 2018. That sketch plan was different in that it included the property at the corner of County Road 10 and Fir Lane North (PID 2511923140023), which is not included in this sketch and it included more multifamily units on the site. The Council indicated support for that project but noted that the proposed elevations will be important as a gateway to Corcoran. Council also noted that locating parking lots along County Road 10 would not be a desirable entrance to the City. Zoning and Land Use The project site is guided Mixed Residential (on both the 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plan), which is planned to be developed at 8-10 units per acre, and zoned RSF-3 (Single and Two Family Residential). The land use and zoning are inconsistent and would need to be resolved prior to development. The property is also located in the Southeast District and is subject to the Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines (Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance). Surrounding Properties The property to the south is Lions Park, which is guided Mixed Use and zoned PUD and the planned Bass Lake Crossing South, which is guided Low Density Residential and Light Industrial and zoned PUD. The property to the west is guided Low Density Residential, zoned PUD and is being developed as Bass Lake Crossing. The property to the north is vacant land guided Low Density Residential and zoned RSF-2 (Single Family Residential 2). The property to the west is located in the City of Maple Grove, is guided for low-medium density residential and is planned for single family home development by the applicant. Agenda Item: 8c. Cook Lake Corcoran PUD Sketch Plan (19-007) 2 April 25, 2019 Natural Characteristics of the Site There are a number of trees on site, but the Comprehensive Plan does not identify any ecologically significant features. There are wetlands and floodplain areas on site near Cook Lake. The bulk of the site is located in the Shoreland Overlay District for Cook Lake. 3. Analysis of Request Land Use and Zoning The project site is guided Mixed Residential, which is planned to be developed at 8-10 units per acre, and zoned RSF-3 (Single and Two Family Residential). The land use and zoning are inconsistent and would need to be resolved prior to development. The applicant’s narrative states that 133-141 units will be developed on 27.31 acres, which is a gross density of 4.9-5.2 units per acre. The applicant has not provided any information about net density, but staff estimates it to be 6 +/- units per acre. Therefore, the applicant would need to request that the land be reclassified from Mixed Residential (8-10 units per acre) to Medium Density Residential (6 to 8 units per acre). The property would to need to be re-zoned from RSF-3, which does not allow multiple-family dwellings, to RMF-1 or PUD. Single family and two family dwellings are permitted uses and three- story multiple-family dwellings is a conditional use in the RMF-1. The applicant should request to rezone the property to PUD with RMF-1 zoning district as the underlying standards. If the applicant proceeds with a formal application, they will also be requesting to plat the property. The City has a high level of discretion in approving or denying a land use guide plan amendment. The land use plan is a major element of the comprehensive plan. The land use plan is the city’s long -range planning tool that indicates what type of development should occur on all land within the City. In other words, it is the City’s plan for how it wants to direct future development and growth. The City Council may guide property as it deems necessary to protect and promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City must deny the rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. Sketch Plan The applicant’s sketch plan shows 74th Avenue extending from Bass Lake Crossing through this project as a loop that connects to County Road 10. The proposed 17-19 single family homes are located north of 74th Avenue and the multi-family units are south of this street. Cook Lake Corcoran PUD Sketch Plan (19-007) 3 April 25, 2019 The applicant’s narrative states that United Properties would develop the Applewood Pointe senior co-op, but did not provide any information about the developer for twin or townhome and single family villa products. Staff notes that Section 1060.050 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes general building standards for residential uses, including the types of materials that are permitted and Section 1040.040, Subd. 8 establishes residential design standards and Section 1040.070, Subd. 8 establishes multi-family standards. Examples of architecture for the single family villas and a three-dimensional site plan of the apartment building demonstrating a preliminary design concept were submitted. No architectural concepts or examples were submitted for the twinhomes. At this stage of the process we do not have enough information to evaluate compliance, but the applicant is aware of these standards. During the previous sketch plan review, the Council expressed concern about the flat elevation and height of the apartments at this gateway to the City. This plan does provide good articulation of the senior co-op building to help break up the mass of the building. The four-story portion of the building remains on the County Road 10 side of the building. The Council should provide feedback on the building massing. Additionally, staff notes that Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance establishes Southeast District Design Guidelines. The concept plans do not provide significant detail to determine whether they are consistent with these and other Design Guideline requirements, however, the architectural examples provided by the applicant for the single family product appear to demonstrate high quality design. Density The proposed pre-development gross density for the development appears to be 4.9-5.2 units/gross acre and staff estimates a net density of 6 +/- units/net acre. The applicant has not yet provided pre- and post-net density calculations for the site. Setbacks Staff recommends that development standards be established for the ease of the City and Developer if the project progresses. The table below compares the requested setbacks to the zoning standards: Proposed RMF-1 (Single Family/Two Family) RMF-1 (Townhome) RMF-1 (Apartment/Condomini um) RSF-2 (Single Family) Minimum lot area 37.31 acres 7,000 sq. ft./7,500 sq. ft. 5,400 sq. ft. 1 Acre 6,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot width 550+ ft. for senior units 65 ft. for single family 70 ft./150 ft. n/a 100 feet 60 feet Cook Lake Corcoran PUD Sketch Plan (19-007) 4 April 25, 2019 Proposed RMF-1 (Single Family/Two Family) RMF-1 (Townhome) RMF-1 (Apartment/Condomini um) RSF-2 (Single Family) Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From Major Roadways* Unknown 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet Front, From all other streets Unknown 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Side Unknown 10 feet 10 feet 30 feet 10 feet Rear Unknown 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 4 stories 35 feet 25 feet in Shoreland 35 feet 25 feet in Shoreland 35 feet or three stories 25 feet in Shoreland 35 feet or 3 stories 25 feet in Shoreland Setback from OHW of Cook Lake <150 feet 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet Staff notes that there is a 100-foot setback from County Road 10. Council has indicated in previous discussions the importance of a larger setback to maintain the rural feel of the community. Section 1060.070, Subd. K and J of the Zoning Ordinance allows the 100-foot setback to be reduced to a 60- foot building setback and 50-foot parking setback if additional landscaping is provided adjacent to the County Road. It does not appear that the senior co-op complies with these standards and the applicant should ensure compliance with front setback requirements if the project moves forward. Landscaping No landscape plan was provided with the concept plan, but staff notes that a well -designed landscape is an important part of this project to ensure transitions between potentially conflicting land uses. We will review the landscape plan with the development plan submittal for compliance with the ordinance standards. The developer may wish to provide an upgraded landscape plan as one of the PUD benefits. Transportation The planned extension of 74th Avenue is shown as a 60-foot right-of-way with a 32-foot wide street. It appears that sidewalks are provided on both sides of the street. The sidewalks would connect to the north-south trail being constructed partially on this property as part of the Bass Lake Crossing project. That trail should be clearly shown on the plans. There are numerous driveways shown onto 74th Avenue, some of which are located along curves. Sight lines on the road will need to be reviewed as part of the plat application to ensure engineering and safety standards are met. Cook Lake Corcoran PUD Sketch Plan (19-007) 5 April 25, 2019 This concept plan does not show access for the 3.08-acre parcel to the southwest (PID 2511923140023). As a part of the development plan, access from the proposed extension of 74th Avenue North should be provided. The cul de sac is shown as a 50-foot right-of-way with a 28-foot wide street. At the end of the cul de sac is a private drive serving 3 homes. The ordinance allows private drives only in the Rural Residential district subject to certain standards. The Council could allow the private drives by PUD if desired, but the private drive must meet all public safety standards. As part of the development plan, the County will request an additional right-of-way from this property for County Road 10 to allow for a 120-foot right-of-way. This is consistent what has been requested by the County in the past. Additionally, the County will likely request a 5-foot trail easement on each side of the County right-of-way. Public Safety The public safety committee would require a paved fire access road around the multi-family structure. Fire access must be provided for any homes on a private drive. Stormwater The City Engineer’s memo dated April 17, 2019 notes that in recent developments in this area show that stormwater management is feasible, but the development plans will need to convey stormwater toward Cook Lake while preventing bluff and lakeshore erosion. The applicant will need to meet Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) rules and City regulations. Wetlands There are wetlands shown on the site plan. A wetland delineation and wetland mitigation plan has not been provided to the City but will be required with a formal application. The City is now the LGU for Wetland Conservation Act and permits will be required. The wetlands on the north are ranked on the National Resource Communities Quality Rankings map as medium quality. There are wetlands identified in the southeast corner of the site is not currently ranked on the Natural Resource Communities Quality Rankings map and it appears that the applicant is proposing to fill this wetland. When development is proposed, it must identify wetland buffers, setbacks, or proposed wetland fill. If mitigation occurs, a mitigation plan must be submitted for review and approval and Elm Creek Watershed District approval must be obtained. All wetlands must be blanketed by a drainage and utility easement. Cook Lake Corcoran PUD Sketch Plan (19-007) 6 April 25, 2019 Shoreland Overlay District The wetland is also called Cook Lake. The property is subject to the Shoreland Overlay District standards for any land that is within 1,000 feet of the OHWL (Ordinanary High Water Level) of Cook Lake. The primary impacts of the district are a 150-foot setback from Cook Lake OHWL, an impervious surface coverage limitation of 25% and a maximum building height of 25 feet. It appears that the application will require PUD flexibility from all of those standards. Utilities Sewer and water will be extended to serve the site. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) owns property in the middle of the site for a lift station that will begin operation this spring. The plans show this parcel as Outlot B, but if the parcel is intended to be replatted MCES must be part of the preliminary plat application. There is a temporary easement to this parcel from the south and a permanent easement from the west. Both must be clearly shown on the plans. Access to the future lift station must be provided with the plat application and easement documents will be required to be recorded with the final plat. The development will be required to extend sewer to the south property line near Brockton Lane and reroute a City forcemain connection. This is a requirement of our MCES temporary connection permit since the south forcemain was a “temporary” route until this property developed. There is an existing drainage and utility easement in the northwest corner of this site that was dedicated with the Bass Lake Crossing plat and it must be shown on the plans. The developer is also proposing to develop the adjacent property in Maple Grove. An agreement between the City of Corcoran and the City of Maple Grove would be necessary for any low area in Maple Grove to be accommodated by Corcoran. The Corcoran water system requires a booster station on site. The plans show this booster station in Maple Grove. If Maple Grove does not agree to that location, it must be relocated onto this site. The developer must complete water modeling with the preliminary plat application to ensure adequate water pressure and fire flows would be provided. The developer may be required to relocate water mains. Parks and Trails The Comprehensive Plan shows an off-road trail on the west property line. This trail will be built by Bass Lake Crossing as part of their development and a portion of the trail is on this site. This existing trail easement must be shown on the plans. No other park land dedication is shown on this site. Therefore, the City should accept cash-in-lieu of land to meet the park dedication requirements. Proposed PUD The applicant has provided a proposal to rezone the property from RSF-3 to PUD with RMF-2 as the underlying zoning district. At the current density, staff recommends that RMF-1 be used as the underlying zoning district. The application materials do not specifically what PUD flexibility is requested, but it appears that the request includes: Cook Lake Corcoran PUD Sketch Plan (19-007) 7 April 25, 2019 1. Setback flexibility. No dimensions are provided, but the plan does not appear to meet the 100-foot setback from County Road 10 (or the 60-foot building and 50-foot parking setback allowed with increased landscaping). It also appears that the single family homes would be requesting some setback flexibility. 2. Shoreland setback flexibility. There is a 150-foot setback from the OWHL of Cook Lake. Two of the lots encroach into this setback and require flexibility. 3. Increased building height. The zoning code allows a requested a maximum building height of three stories or 35 feet. However, the shoreland overlay district limits all buildings to a maximum height of 25 feet. The multi-family building range from 3 stories and up to 50 feet in height. 4. Impervious surface area. The shoreland ordinance limits sites to a maximum of 25% of the lot area. The applicant indicates that that are 33%-34% impervious. Final calculations and details have not been provided with the sketch plan. 5. Private drive. To allow a private drive off a cul de sac to serve three homes. The ordinance allows private drives only in the Rural Residential district subject to certain standards. The Council should provide feedback on the applicant’s narrative and whether there are additional issues to be addressed or items that would not be desirable in this PUD. The applicant would take those comments under advisement as they prepare a formal submittal. Next Steps If the applicant chooses to proceed with the application, they would need to submit applications for: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Staff notes that no Comprehensive Plan Amendment can be approved while the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council.) • Rezoning to PUD • Preliminary Plat • Preliminary PUD Development Plan Then the applicant would submit applications for: • Final Plat • Final PUD Development Plan Summary While this is not the formal application, the Council should provide direction to the applicant so that they can decide whether to proceed with formal application. • This is the gateway to the City and careful consideration should be given to how this property develops. Is this concept reflective of the City’s vision? Cook Lake Corcoran PUD Sketch Plan (19-007) 8 April 25, 2019 • The Southeast District Plan anticipates multi-family housing in the Town Center where it can support the Downtown Core commercial businesses. The 2017 “Market Potential Analysis for the Corcoran Commercial Core” completed by Maxfield Research & Consulting identified a demand for 247 units of multi-family housing (market rate and senior) between now and 2030. Allowing multi-family housing on this site could affect the City’s ability to attract this type of housing in the Town Center. However, the Applewood Senior Co-op would offer a housing type that is not currently available in the area. • Does the Council see PUD benefits in exchange for the PUD flexibility requested? 4. Action The applicant is requesting comments on this sketch plan. Any comments given by the City Council are advisory in nature and non-binding. While the comments are non-binding, the applicant will consider the comments from the City Council when they prepare their formal submittal. Attachments a. Aerial Location Map b. 2040 Park & Trail Map c. Memo from City Engineer dated April 17, 2019 d. Applicant’s Narrative dated April 5, 2019 e. Site Graphics dated and April 15, 2019 f. Architecture Examples dated April 5, 2019 g. Existing Trail Easement – dedicated with Bass Lake Crossing h. Existing Drainage Easement – dedicated with Bass Lake Crossing Henn e p in Co u nty Prop erty Map Da te : 4/1 8/2019 Com ments: 1 inc h = 8 00 feet PAR C EL ID: 25 11923140003 OWN ER N AME: Alb er t Schommer Es tate PAR C EL AD DR ESS: 1 922 0 Co R d N o 10, Corcoran MN 55340 PAR C EL AR EA: 27 .31 a cr es , 1,189,446 sq ft A-T-B: Ab s trac t SAL E PR ICE: SAL E D ATA: SAL E C ODE: ASSESSED 2 018 , PAYABLE 2019 PR OPERT Y TYPE: Res idential H OM ESTEAD : Homes tead M AR KET VAL UE: $414,000 TAX TO TAL: $6,091.96 ASSESSED 2 019 , PAYABLE 2020 PRO PER TY TYPE: Residential HO MESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALU E: $417,400 This dat a (i) is fur nished 'AS IS' wit h no represent at ion as t o com plet enes s or acc ura cy ; (ii) is furnis hed with no war rant y of an y k ind; an d (i ii) is not s uit able for lega l, engi neering or s urv ey ing purpos es . Hen nepin C ounty s hall not be liable f or any damage, in jury o r los s r esu lt ing f rom t his data. CO PYRIG HT © HENNEPIN CO UN TY 20 19 City of Greenfield City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers % Trailhead MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake CookLake 456710 456750 456719 456730 County Road 116 Oakdale Dr B r i d l e Pa t h J e f f r e y L n Abilene Ln Tr ail Ln Hunters Rdg County Road 30 He a t h e r Ln Pioneer Trl Trail Haven Rd County Road 10 Horseshoe Trl Robert Ln H o r s e s h o e Bend D r C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Willow Dr Hunter Rd County Road 19 ES t Homestead Trl Maple Hill Rd Cain Rd Rolling Hills Rd S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd Mohawk Dr El mS t Larkin Rd Foxline Dr Strehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old Se t t le rs R d County R o a d 1 1 7 Stieg Rd Bechtold Rd Kalk Rd S c hu t t e R d Meister Rd F o x V a l l e y Dr M y s t i q u e Dr H a g e Dr 93rd Ave N Sc hut t e P l Bra n d y w i n e Rd Chisholm T r l Tessmer Rd HighBluffLn Winc hesterTrl JubertLn R u sh Creek RushCreek CountyDitch N u m b e r S ixtee n Cou nty Ditch N u mberThree SouthFor k R u s h C r e e k NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and Trails Regional Trail Existing On Road Trail City Park Trailhead Private Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and Trails Proposed On Road Trail Proposed Off Road Trail Proposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development Area Neighborhood Park Community Park Greenway Corridor Municipal Boundaries 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands NP Engineer’s Memo Wenck | Colorado | Georgia | Minnesota | North Dakota | Wyoming Toll Free 800-472-2232 Web wenck.com To: Kendra Lindahl, AICP, City Planner From: Kent Torve, P.E., City Engineer Date: April 17, 2019 Subject: Applewood Pointe Development 0.0 Background Applicant has submitted a concept for the Schommer parcel north of CR 10, adjacent to the Maple Grove border. Staff review resulted in these initial engineering and Public Works comments. These are concept review concepts and as the project moves forward a feasibility study (focused on transportation but includes sewer, water and stormwater) is necessary. 1.0 Transportation ➢ An access at Brockton Road is consistent with City’s transportation plan. ➢ Maple Grove’s “Edgewater East” development will access from the east. ➢ Based on County requirements for recent developments, it can be expected that a turn lane or other improvements will be required. ➢ Additional ROW along CR 10 (north side) will be required by County to straighten the road alignment. It is recommended developer initiate discussions with County. ➢ Provide street connection to the three acre parcel to the southwest. 2.0 Water ➢ The City’s trunk water system requires a booster station located near the Maple Grove connection. A parcel will be dedicated during the preliminary plat process. ➢ Relocating the existing water main due to site grading may be necessary and would be performed at developer cost. Any upsizing of water main through the development would receive credit. ➢ The development will be required to extend water service to the southwest three-acre parcel. Kendra Lindahl Engineer’s Memo 2 3.0 Sanitary Sewer ➢ MCES owns a lift station within the development boundaries and operation will begin spring of 2019. o Access will need to be provided during development construction. o Existing MCES easement will need to be addressed. ➢ The development will be required to extend sewer to the south property line near Brockton Lane and reroute a City forcemain connection. This is a requirement of our MCES temporary connection permit since the south forcemain was a “temporary” route until this property developed. ➢ The development will be required to extend sewer service to the southwest three-acre parcel. 4.0 Stormwater ➢ Applicant shall comply with the Elm Creek Water Management Organization rules and also City construction plan approval. ➢ One potential issue is the route and method to convey stormwater down the bluff towards Cook Lake and adequate energy dissipation to prevent lakeshore erosion. ➢ Two existing ravines will require review for potential stabilization improvements. 5.0 Wetlands ➢ City is now the LGU for Wetland Conservation Act and permits will be required. Corcoran. MN M18 -296 04-15-2019 'APPLEWOOD POINTE'SITE PLAN north 0' 200' Corcoran. MN M18 -296 04-15-2019 'APPLEWOOD POINTE' 0' 100' B A S S L A K E R O A D 5.8 ACRES 4.5 ACRES 30 cars surface parking 20 cars surface parking 30 cars surface parking THREE STORY FOUR STORY APPLEWOOD POINTE SITE PLAN north 50' ravine 28' road 24' 18 TWIN HOMES 35' Corcoran. MN M18 -296 04-15-2019 'APPLEWOOD POINTE' view looking northwest Corcoran. MN M18 -296 04-15-2019 'APPLEWOOD POINTE' view looking west Corcoran. MN M18 -296 04-15-2019 'APPLEWOOD POINTE' view looking north 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform D ATE: April 17, 2019 for the April 25, 2019 City Council Meeting RE: City-Initiated Update to Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance (Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines) (City File 18-012) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:NA 1.Summary The Council directed staff to provide an update to the Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines (Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance) based on changes in the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan, specifically related to changes to the planned road alignment. Background In 2004, the City of Corcoran adopted design guidelines for each of the three districts of the City planned to get municipal sewer and water: the Southwest District, the Northeast District and the Southeast District (including Downtown). In 2011, the City adopted a new Comprehensive Plan and new ordinance standards to implement the Comprehensive Plan. In 2015, the City of Corcoran, in partnership with Hennepin County, began work to update the existing design guidelines for the Southeast District. The Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Downtown Design Guidelines are proposed to be modified to reflect the 2030 Future Land Use Plan and other changes needed to implement the City’s Vision. The new Southeast District Master Plan and Design Guidelines were adopted in 2016 as Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance. The draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan makes significant changes to the planned transportation system, which result in the need for changes to the Southeast District Plan. On November 8, 2018 the Council held a work session and reviewed the draft update to the plan, including two alternatives for the Town Center plan. The Council took comments from the public and directed staff to: a.refine Concept #1 with changes to move the apartments to the east side of the Town Center, b.try to shift tall buildings away from the County roads, c.provide a cost estimate for a below grade crossing at the County roads, d.meet with interested developers to hear their ideas and consider incorporating into the revised plan. Agenda Item 8d. SE District Design Guidelines Update 2 April 25, 2019 On February 28, 2019, the Council held a work session to review the updated draft. The Council directed staff to make additional changes to the draft and hold a public hearing. The changes made as directed, include: a. Elimination of the Bikeway Streets, which have painted bike lanes on the street and encourage bikes to use trails or paved shoulders b. Refine the language to distinguish between street standards for the Town Center, which will be narrower and more pedestrian oriented, and streets in the SE district outside of the Town Center. 2. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 4th. There was no one present to speak on the item. The Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval. 3. Key Issues The primary focus of this effort was to update the subdistrict boundaries (Town Center and Downtown Core) based on the changes planned for the future transportation network. Specifically, the Council changed the transportation plan to eliminate the planned realignment of County Road 10 and 50. Keeping County Road 10 on the current alignment requires change to the Town Center plan. As staff took a fresh look at the site, we kept a similar mix of uses in the Town Center, including a town square park as a key element. Land Use As we have discussed previously, this is an aspirational plan for the Town Center and the Council should plan to use it as a guiding document with flexibility to respond to the marketplace. The guidelines envision 2- and 3-story buildings in the Downtown Core, but some uses (like apartments) may desire 4- or 5-story buildings. The Council has indicated support for taller buildings but prefer them to be located away from the Downtown Core. In this updated version, the apartments have shifted from County Road 116 east to Maple Hill Road as directed by the Council. The document notes that this our preferred plan, but that the entire Town Center is guided Mixed Use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and will be developed by Planned Unit Development (PUD). This gives the Council the discretion to modify the concept plan to respond to new opportunities and market demand. Staff asked us to look at a community space in the Town Center. This was something included in the 2004 version of the plan and we wanted to provide options for how the area could accommodate a large user like that. These graphics show preferred areas for those types of facilities if proposed but do not require development of this community space. Utilities These plans also show the trunk sewer alignment, which was reviewed as part of the 2016 plan, but was not specifically shown on the previous plans. SE District Design Guidelines Update 3 April 25, 2019 We have looked more closely at the site and included a concept that shows existing water features as part of the stormwater treatment train. As a result, the wetlands and ditches become part of the stormwater management system and help to define blocks with in the Town Center. These can be amenities for development in the Town Center. This could be used as part of a regional stormwater system. Since the November meeting, engineering has developed a conceptual regional stormwater system that has been incorporated into the plan. Streets The revised plan assumes that County Road 10 will stay on its current alignment in this area and that Maple Hill Road will be realigned to tee into County Road 10. The intersection alignment at County Road 10 and County Road 116 would remain as is, but the plan does anticipate that additional right-of-way will be acquired. In each of the plans, access points on County Road 116 are fixed based on future street extensions at ¼ and ½ mile spacing per the County guidelines. On County Road 10, the concept shrink s the standard spacing guidelines, but is consistent with initial concept discussion with County transportation staff. The spine of the Town Center plan is a new parkway that connects County Road 116 (generally at the south entrance of City Hall) to County Road 10 to provide good access to the Town Center. This new public street is a key component of the new Town Center as it provides access to all parcels and the tree lined parkway (with a median like the entrance at Ravinia) will create a special gateway to the Corcoran Town Center. As development occurs, the City will want to consider the City’s role in constructing this new public street; specifically, whether it will be constructed in pieces as development occurs or designed and constructed in a single phase to make the Town Center “development ready”. During this most recent round of revisions staff discussed expanding the scope of work to revisit the street typology. The original street plan was developed by the committee (including Hennepin County staff) with an emphasis on providing a variety of transportation options in the City and did not distinguish between the Town Center and the rest of the Southeast District. SE District Design Guidelines Update 4 April 25, 2019 Figure 1 2016 Adopted Street Plan Figure 2 Revised Street Plan Staff is recommending that two changes be made to the street network, as shown in the draft plan: a.Eliminate the Bikeway Streets, which have painted bike lanes on the street and encourage bikes to use trails or paved shoulders b.Refine the language to distinguish between street standards for the Town Center, which will be narrower and more pedestrian oriented, and streets in the Southeast district outside of the Town Center. The City will continue to prioritize pedestrian and bike connections in the Southeast District. Trail Crossing The plan notes that “The City will continue to work with Hennepin County to ensure future improvements are consistent with City’s vision as well as the County policy related to Complete Streets. As part of this vision, the City will look for opportunities to provide grade-separated pedestrian crossings in addition to the at-grade crossings.” The Council asked staff to provide a cost estimate for a below grade crossing at the County roads. Public Works Director Mattson reviewed the issue and estimates that construction of a below grade crossing would be approximately $500,000. This cost includes installation of the box culvert and construction within the right-of-way but does not include any work on private property for grading or other improvements needed to provide an accessible route. Those improvements should be coordinated with the adjacent landowner during the development process to ensure feasibility. SE District Design Guidelines Update 5 April 25, 2019 Developer Feedback Staff spoke to representatives from the two largest landowners in the Town Center. Both indicated a desire to keep their options open and respond to market demand. We believe that this master plan provides guidance for how the City wishes to see the property develop and provides direction on where public infrastructure (streets, parks, regional ponds) while giving the Council the discretion to respond to the marketplace. Staff have met with existing business owners who asked about expanding the commercial area outside of the existing commercial areas west of County Road 116 and the Town Center. Staff believes that offering other commercial sites in the Southeast District would diminish the value of the Town Center. It has been the Council’s desire to create a community center and concentrating new retail and commercial in the Town Center will help to create the place for Corcoran residents to gather. We did not recommend any new commercial areas outside of the Town Center. Summary The draft version of Appendix B is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and reflect additional refinements directed by the City Council through a series of work sessions. 4. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: a. Ordinance 2019-391 adopting Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance b. Resolution 2019-34 approving Findings of Fact for the Ordinance Amendment c. Summary Ordinance 2019-392 Attachments 1. Ordinance 2019-391 adopting Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance 2. Resolution 2019-34 approving Findings of Fact for the Ordinance Amendment 3. Summary Ordinance 2019-392 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-391 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 10 (THE ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 18-014) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Title 10 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by repealing Appendix B (Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines) in its entirety and replacing with the following: See Attachment A SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 25th day of April 2019. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schulz, Alan Schulz, Alan ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota 2 Attachment A Revised Appendix B (Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines) Appendix B Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines DRAFT March 27, 2019 | 3 Southeast District Overview | 5 Purpose Application Southeast District Vision Sites and Structures Southeast District Principles | 7 Landscaping and Screening Signage and Gateways Parks, Trails and Public Space Healthy Communities | 25 Town Center | 27 Overview Buildings - Placement, Massing and Height Screening and Loading Facades Streets Parking and Access Landscaping and Screening Community Center Test Table of Contents Downtown Core | 39 Overview Vision Site Development Buildings - Placement, Massing and Height Streetscape Parking Public Art Signage Plazas Implementation | 45 Southeast District Boundary Town Center Downtown Core Existing Downtown Floodplain Watercourse Maple/Basswood Disturbed Woodland Savanna/Pasture Wet Prairie Emergent Shrub Floodplain Forest NP / Neighborhood Park OSP / Nature Park ASA / Athletic Search Area Golf Course On Road Trail Off Road Trail Potential Water Tower Open Water Potential Natural Gas Pipeline Easement Trail City of Corcoran Proposed Trails Parks Utilities Wetland Communities Upland Plant Communities Important Features LEGEND District Boundaries * Southeast District Analysis Map. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes planned future infrastructure improvements in the district including rerouting County Road 10 to provide safer access points and improving County Road 10 intersections. The existing trail system will be supplemented by a network of on- and off-road trails. Natural assets including wetlands, creeks and uplands, woodlands and savannah provide a framework and inspiration for development aesthetics. A new water tower is planned within the district. The general location is shown on the map, but the final location will be determined as development occurs. Municipal sanitary sewer and water are also in place to serve the future Town Center. 01 Overview | 5 In 2015, the City of Corcoran, in partnership with Hennepin County, began work to update the existing design guidelines and master plan for the Southeast District. The Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines were modified to reflect the 2030 Future Land Use Plan and other changes needed to implement the City’s Vision. This update was developed to reflect the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which no longer includes the realignment of County Roads 10 and 50, but does continue to show a partial realignment of County Road 10 onto Meister Road at a future date. The Southeast District is the historic heart of the City. The intersection of County Road 10 and County Road 116 is a historic crossroads and this area is home to the existing city hall, St. Thomas Catholic Church and the existing business park. The Southeast District is also beginning to see the residential development that has long been anticipated with the development of Lennar’s “Ravinia” neighborhood and M/I Homes “Bass Lake Crossing” and “Bass Lake Crossing South.” The Town Center (including the Downtown Core) within the Southeast District is a mixed-use district combining retail, office and service commercial with a mix of low, medium and higher density residential. The planned development is balanced by extensive open space and natural resources, including two golf courses (Rush Creek & Shamrock), Lions Park, Corcoran Community Park, the City Hall park and the Rush Creek corridor. Purpose The primary purpose of Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines is to set basic parameters, describe preferences and illustrate design intent. These guidelines serve as principles within which creative design can and should occur – there is no one solution, but many options that meet the basic requirements of this document. Application The format and content are specifically tailored for use as a supplement to the Zoning Ordinance. This master plan provides illustrative guidance for building locations and orientation. Any changes to this approved master plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Council as part of the development application. Southeast District Vision Create a complete transportation network that balances pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular use with mix of residential housing types, retail and an expanded employment base, while maintaining access to the natural resources that define Corcoran’s quality of life. Southeast District Overview Southeast District Objectives 1. The Southeast District has key transportation corridors within the City of Corcoran which provide vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian connections to adjacent communities. 2. The Southeast District is home to Corcoran Community Park. 3. The Southeast District includes a variety of businesses that provide retail and services that support the daily needs of residents. 4. The Southeast District includes a Town Center with retail, office, housing, public spaces, and employment opportunities. 5. The Southeast District provides life- cycle housing opportunities that are within walking and biking distance of Downtown. 6. The Southeast District provides a concentration of urban housing options, so that the majority of the City can remain rural. 6 | District Principles Southeast District Concept Plan. The Southeast District is the spatial framework for these design standards. The Town Center and Downtown Core are nested within the district each with additional guidance to create the neighborhoods and places envisioned by the community. Commercial Mixed Use High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Public / Semi-Public Mixed Residential Parks / Open Space Agricultural Preserve Industrial Not to Scale Southeast District Boundary Town Center Downtown Core Land Use Classification Retail Residential Public Agriculture Industrial LEGEND District Boundaries District Principles | 7 02 Southeast District Principles Sites and Structures The Southeast District should continue to provide a mix of residential, commercial, office and industrial uses as described in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The Design Guidelines for the district shall be the same as those described in the Zoning Ordinance for the zoning district in which the development is located and these Design Standards will provide an additional layer of standards. New residential development should provide for the full range of life cycle housing, offering choices of housing types at low, medium and higher densities. Within the Southeast District, the combination of site and building design should provide a visual cue that this is a unique place. For single family, twin and townhome structures, architecture styles including: Agrarian Contemporary, Farmhouse, and Arts & Crafts - Prairie are encouraged, as is the use of regional building materials and native plants. Development in this district should be thoughtfully designed to reflect Corcoran’s rural character. 8 | District Principles Agrarian Contemporary Agrarian Contemporary style homes rely on simple forms with strong roof lines and inviting front porches. This style is a clean, crisp, more contemporary version of the Agrarian Rural style. Typical style elements include: • Form and Roof • Simple roof design, front to back gable or side to side • 5:12 to 12:12 roof pitches • Overhang eaves • Walls and Windows: • Horizontal or board and batten siding, stucco or a combination • Symmetrical placement and distinct fenestration rhythms • Square, circular or 2:1 proportioned vertical rectangular windows with grid patterns • Details • Porches with simple columns, trim and railings • Minimal door and window trim detailing • Dormers, cupolas, shutters, exposed rafter tails District Principles | 9 Farmhouse Farmhouse style is comfortable and practical. It is a hybrid of elements brought together by regional craftsmen and traditions of the early 20th century. Typical style elements include: • Form and Roof • Two story • Asymmetrical, angular design with tall proportions. • Gable roof • 8:12 or greater roof pitch • Overhang eaves • Wood or asphalt shingled roof • Walls and Windows: • Wood cladding with horizontal, diagonal or vertical layout • Tall rectangular windows with large panes • Details • Decorative braces and brackets • Plain trim boards and soffits • Corbels and gable trusses • Wrap porches • Geometric patterns • Embellished porch railings 10 | District Principles Arts & Crafts - Prairie Prairie Style is truly American, derived by Frank Lloyd Wright and Louis Sullivan. Typical style elements include: • Form and Roof • Low pitched roof with wide overhanging eaves • Massive square porch supports • Two stories with one story porches or wings • Gable roof edges flattened • 3-1/2:12 or greater roof pitch • Hipped roof • Walls and Windows: • Horizontal windows, sometimes wrapping around corners • Tall casement windows • Geometric patterns of small-pane windows • Details • Detail emphasizing horizontal lines • Contrasting wood trim • Horizontal patterns in wall materials • Window boxes • Ornamentation at the door or cornice line • Flattened pedestal urns District Principles | 11 Street Hierarchy One significant development consideration in this district is increasing the intensity of use without overloading the existing transportation network. Current plans will create safer, better managed traffic flow and correct several difficult intersections. County Road 116 will continue to be the central route through the Southeast District, but improvements are planned for where County Road 116 passes through the Town Center. As improvements are made to this road, emphasis should be placed on creating a pedestrian-friendly environment. Enhancements to traffic controls, pedestrian connections, lighting, gateway elements and landscaping at key intersections will serve that purpose. The County Road 116 corridor should be designed with green boulevards on both sides, with particular attention given to the east side of the road where a linear park with off-road trail is planned. Where County Road 116 passes through the Town Center, this road should shift to the east to allow for a center landscaped boulevard and other enhancements that will express a sense of Town Center identity. The intersections of County Road 116 and Larkin Road and County Road 116 and City Hall Drive (proposed new road just south of City Hall) mark the entry points into this area, and the start of the proposed boulevard. The design of these intersections should balance the needs of traffic and pedestrians. The City will continue to work with Hennepin County to ensure future improvements are consistent with City’s vision as well as the County policy related to Complete Streets. As part of this vision, the City will look for opportunities to provide grade-separated pedestrian crossings in addition to the at-grade crossings. The existing road network should be maintained as a continuous network, with new connections where needed. Cul-de-sacs are strongly discouraged in the Town Center. Cul-de-sacs should be avoided throughout the Southeast District in favor of connecting streets that will facilitate resilient multi-modal routes within the district. The Southeast District has six main types of streets which are described and illustrated on the following pages. Each serves a specific function toward the creation of a well connected and economically viable Southeast District. Street Connectivity. A connected network of streets provides system resiliency and greater capacity with the same lane miles. Top: Connected Network is preferred. Bottom: Sparse Hierarchy with cul-de-sacs is not desirable. X 12 | District Principles Street typology in this appendix does not take the place of the standards found in the Corcoran Comprehensive Plan and Subdivision Ordinance, but is intended to supplement that information with a more detailed description of the street design in this district. These standards will be applied for development in the Town Center, but the City may require developments in other areas of the Southeast District to follow the standards in the Engineering Design Standards. The developer shall be responsible for construction of all streetscape improvements along adjacent streets. These improvements include all hardscape, landscape and site amenities, such as trails, sidewalks, benches, bike racks, street trees and plantings. Frontage (space between the back of curb and the right-of-way line) can be divided into two zones: the throughway and pedestrian buffer. Throughway is foremost the accessible route for pedestrians. Once the needs for ADA accessibility are met, the remaining width is based on the needs of the frontage. An urban frontage with shopping and many pedestrians requires a wider throughway to allow for window shopping, couples walking side-by- side, strollers and the like. Pedestrian Buffer is the space between the throughway and the back of curb. It will also vary in width depending on the needs of the adjacent land uses. In active urban areas, the pedestrian buffer includes patio tables, pedestrian lighting, street trees, planters and all the amenities that support the streetscape character. In single family residential neighborhoods, the pedestrian buffer is generally tree lined with turf or plantings tended by residents. Frontage Prototype. The frontage is a subset of each street section. In high traffic areas, like Main Street, the frontage is wide, fully paved and programmed to support the wide range of retail, service and residential activities occurring on adjacent properties. throughway frontagestreet parking lane pedestrian buffer building type & setback varies by zoning district right-of-way right-of-way throughway frontagestreet pedestrian buffer building type & setback varies by zoning district In low density residential areas, the frontage is narrow and supports the needs of a quiet neighborhood. A sidewalk and turf boulevard with regularly spaced overstory and tall ornamental trees is sufficient. District Principles | 13 Type ROW Width County Road 120 feet Parkway Street 72 feet Main Street (Downtown Core)70 feet Connector Street 60 feet Local Street 50 feet Southeast District Street Types Map. Not To Scale County Road, Mid-Block (top), Corner/ Intersection (bottom). The County Road street type has a 120-foot wide standard right-of-way. County Engineering standards apply and through current traffic and future demand analysis, the roadway section may include turn lanes, two-lane or four lane sections and required clear zones for safety. On CR 116 within the Town Center, gateway intersections and planted medians reinforce the road’s role to support the Downtown Core. At gateway corners along CR 116, pedestrian amenities should reinforce the gateway character and include high visibility safety features including crosswalks with crossing countdowns lights, center refuge medians, wide pedestrian level pavements and enhanced lighting. On road bike lanes exist on CR 116 today and fit within the future section. Not all county roads are planned to include on-road bike lanes Enhanced Pedestrian Node. (Right) Major crossings of County Roads should have enhanced pedestrian nodes including extra wide concrete landings upon which to wait safely, detectable warnings, and clear crosswalk markings. This example connects a City sidewalk to a Three Rivers Park System trail and so is further enhanced with benches, litter receptacles, wayfinding, decorative fencing, and stone pedestals for future art installation. 70’ Linear ParkEAST WEST EAST WEST64’ Linear Park 120’ Right of Way 120’ Right of Way 48’ Planting Strip 5’ Bike 5’ Bike 5’ Bike 5’ Bike11’ Drive Lane 12’ Drive Lane20’ Planting Strip 24’ Planting Strip10’ Multi-Use Trail Enhanced Pedestrian Node at Crossing Enhanced Pedestrian Node at Crossing12’ Drive Lane 12’ Drive Lane 32’ Planting Strip12’ Drive Lane 9’ Planting Strip10’ Multi-Use Trail 10’ Planting Strip District Principles | 15 8-feet 16-feet wide parking lane 8-feet zero setback Parkway Street. This tree lined street has a 72-foot wide right-of-way and a center median with trees. The median may have turf or perennials and shrubs depending on the surrounding context. Parkways at the entrance to a neighborhood or district are logical places for upgrading the median plantings to perennials and shrubs with trees. In special cases, the median may be depressed and function as a stormwater amenity. In this case, upgraded plantings are advised. The City Engineer may reduce or eliminate on-street parking for this street type outside the Town Center depending on the surrounding context. 6’ Sidewalk 6’ Sidewalk 6’ Planting Strip 6’ Planting Strip 8’ Parking Lane 8’ Parking Lane 11’ Drive Lane 10’ Planting Strip 11’ Drive Lane Main Street is characterized by a 70-foot right-of-way width. Buildings should have a zero setback. The pedestrian realm is an urban streetscape with space for window shopping, furnishings, pedestrian level lighting, overstory trees and planters. 16’ Pedestrian Realm 16’ Pedestrian Realm8’ Parking Lane 8’ Parking Lane Parking Lane Zero Setback8 Ft 8 Ft 11’ Drive Lane 11’ Drive Lane Main Street Pedestrian Realm. The pedestrian realm on Main Street is 16- feet wide from back of curb to building face. Amenities supportive of the building uses are encouraged including: patio seating, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, and planter pots with seasonal displays. Infrastructure like pedestrian level lighting, street trees in landscaped boulevards are also appropriate. 16 | District Principles Connector Street. The Connector Street has a 60-foot right-of-way and prioritizes movement across the community. Setbacks vary by district, but the frontage is consistently a sidewalk in the throughway and a turf boulevard with regularly spaced overstory and tall ornamental trees. Local Street. The Local Street has a 50-foot right-of-way with parking on one side and serves the movement needs of neighborhood residents. Setbacks vary by district, but the frontage is consistently a sidewalk in the throughway and a turf boulevard with regularly spaced overstory and tall ornamental trees. The drive lane near the curb is slightly wider to accommodate vehicular buffer space. 5’ Sidewalk 5’ Sidewalk 5’ Sidewalk 5’ Sidewalk 6’ 6’ 6’ 6’ 8’ Parking Lane 8’ Parking Lane 7’ Parking Lane 11’ Drive Lane 11’ Drive Lane 11’ Drive Lane 10’ Drive Lane District Principles | 17 This page left intentionally blank 18 | District Principles Landscaping and Screening Site design and landscaping should be designed to work with the existing topography of the area, preserving the rolling hills, Rush Creek natural resources corridor, woods and wetlands, and natural viewsheds and corridors. Landscape screens with berms, hedgerows, and a variety of deciduous and coniferous native trees and shrubs should be incorporated to minimize undesirable views from the public realm. Signage and Gateways Signage should be designed as an integral part of the building and site design and shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 84 of the City Code. The City will work with developers to: • Include gateway signage at key intersections along County Road 116 and the Town Center. • Incorporate landscaping, lighting and hardscape to anchor the gateway’s visual presence.Gateways. City Center Drive, Main Street and Larkin Road, primary and secondary entrances to the Town Center, should have gateway amenities. landscaping, monument signage and lighting. Main Street Parkway South Parkway North District Principles | 19 Stormwater Management Water features and drainage systems are essential components of development in the Southeast District. A mix of ponds, fountains and other water elements provide focal amenities and year round activities within the framework of an environmentally responsible, visually pleasing strategy to manage stormwater. A series of regional stormwater ponds is envisioned, but each site has a responsibility to utilize best management practices (BMP) to pretreat run-off, reduce erosion and encourage infiltration in compliance with City and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission standards. Water and landscape should be utilized within multipurpose areas that accommodate both active and passive recreational use – the following examples illustrate only a few of many possibilities: 1. Pervious pavements, underground storage and other creative techniques should be used to BMP standards, particularly in the Town Center where more density is expected. 2. Green architecture, expressed through green roofs, gray water recycling and other techniques should be included to reduce the impact of new development on stormwater systems 3. Water feature design should include both formal elements (such as reflecting pools or fountains) and natural/informal forms (such as ponds or fountains) and should explore creative ways to integrate wet landscapes with active, urban spaces. Stormwater Management. Stormwater management infrastructure can take a variety of forms. Master planning regional stormwater is the most efficient use of land. Other options include a hard working below ground system that is topped by a parking lot, streetscape or even a planted swale. These examples of stormwater infrastructure are from various locations around the Twin Cities metro area (top left to bottom right) planted swale within a parking lot, infiltration system under a parking lot, structural cell streetscape system, infiltration trench within a county road median. 20 | District Principles Southeast District Parks Within the Town Center, the linear park along County Road 116, the Town Square, and two small neighborhood playgrounds serve residents and visitors. A. Linear Park B. Town Square C. Neighborhood Park D. Neighborhood Park E. Corcoran Community Park F. City Park near City Hall G. Wildflower Park Existing Parks Proposed Parks A C E G B F D District Principles | 21 Parks, Trails and Public Space The linear park (A) should continue north and south through the town center on the East side of County Road 116, with trail connections to new civic and community spaces and uses. Safe, convenient pedestrian crossings are a priority within the entire Southeast District. New public spaces, parks, and common greens or open space should be linked to other community parks and open space with trail connections to the existing and proposed City parks and trail system. The only active park currently in the Southeast District is Corcoran Community Park (E). The park will likely change over time as the former Rockford school property is developed and road connections in this area are modified, but this will continue to be an important park in the City system and priority should be given to ensuring strong bike and pedestrian connections to this park and other planned parks in the district. A second City park is being developed on the City Hall property (F) and could be expanded to take advantage of the woodland area on the east side of the City Hall property. A new Town Square (B) is planned in the Downtown Core. The Town Square will serve as a social center for the community, suitable for concerts and celebrations, but also as a place to enjoy the scenes of downtown. Picnic tables for lunch, benches for people watching, the Town Square will be a public space to support a bustling downtown. Two small neighborhood parks (C & D) are also planned in and near the Town Center, one each to the north and south of the Downtown Core. These parks will include walking trails and playgrounds. The neighborhood park on the north is nestled in an existing woodland, and will provide interesting walking trails, connecting to City Hall, ample shade, and an opportunity for an exercise circuit (Par Course) for the adjacent senior housing development. The southern neighborhood park is perched on a terrace above the wetland and offers great views across the landscape. A playground and trails through the wetland prairie will offer birdwatching and contemplation. All three parks will be developed when the adjacent property is platted. Another park is proposed in the Southeast District near Blue Bonnet Drive and in the Northwest corner of the Ravinia development. Wildflower Park (G) was recently developed in the Ravinia development. Par Course Station Woodland Playground Wetland Overlook 22 | District Principles Public green space, within close proximity to homes and businesses, is a vital part of a healthy community. A Town Square is meant to serve as a community gathering place for celebrations throughout the seasons. This example from Burnsville is a modern destination surrounded by civic, retail and residential uses. Temporary winter uses like a small ice rink could double the value of a bandshell or picnic pavilion when considered as a warming house in the cold season. Olympic Plaza in Whistler below creates an irregular shaped rink for casual and family use. District Principles | 23 This page left intentionally blank 24 | Healthy Communities Walkable Destinations Map. A five or ten minute walk, 1/4 or 1/2 mile radius, is one common way to consider walkability. Within the Southeast District, there are intended to be a high number of parks, retail uses and residential units within that walkable range. Existing Parks Proposed Parks Not To Scale Healthy Communities | 25 03 Healthy Communities While developing these guidelines, the City of Corcoran was mindful of how community design impacts the health of the people who live, work, play, learn and worship in the city. Communities around the country are increasingly aware of the impact that land-use and transportation have on people’s ability to be active and access healthy food. We also know that a lack of physical activity, combined with diet, is one of the leading factors behind the increase in chronic diseases, such as heart disease and type II diabetes. Sidewalks, trails, bike lanes and parks all provide opportunities for people to be physically active, both recreationally and by incorporating activity into their daily routines. Mixed-use and higher density developments also encourage people to be active by making it easier to bike and walk to destinations rather than driving. When developing the plan and design guidelines for the Southeast District (including the Town Center and the Downtown Core), we looked at the following considerations: • An integrated transportation network: Streets connecting residential areas to the Downtown Core are safe, appealing and accessible to people walking and biking, as well as people driving motor vehicles. A combination of off-road and on-street bike and pedestrian facilities are included to give people safe and convenient options for active transportation. • Accessible destinations and inviting design: Housing, retail and other destinations are located in or near the downtown to invite walking by creating pleasant and safe routes. • Green space: A new Town Square and neighborhood park create additional opportunities for physical activity and promotes social connectedness. 26 | Town Center Mixed Use Town Homes Apartments Single Family Town Center Town Center Concept Plan Legend Downtown Core Gateway Nodes 79th Place 79th Place 79th AvenueTown Center Park South Park North Park Main Street Ma i n S t r e e t 76th Avenue Floodplain Wetlands Larkin Road C i t y C e n t e r D r i v e C i t y C e n t e r D r i v e C o u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 O a k L a n e M u l b e r r y L a n e L a r c h L a n e Ma p l e H i l l R o a d Good Sheperd Church City Hall Not To Scale Town Center | 27 04 Town Center Overview The Town Center is the walkable traditional neighborhood supporting the Downtown Core. The Town Center is bound by City Hall on the north, County Road 10 on the south, County Road 116 on the west and Maple Hill Road on the east. The Town Center is intended to support the Downtown Core through walkable blocks, a variety of housing types and densities, and a unified public realm aesthetic. The Downtown Core is a subset of the Town Center and shall have additional design guidelines. All development within the Southeast District will be based on an integrated transportation network that connects residential neighborhoods with the existing business park on the west side of County Road 116 and the Downtown Core on the east side of County Road 116. A combination of off-road and on-street bike and pedestrian facilities are included to give residents and visitors safe and convenient options for active transportation as an option to driving. Special emphasis will be placed on providing accessible destinations and inviting design. Housing, retail and other destinations are located in or near the Downtown Core to invite walking by creating pleasant and safe routes within the Town Center. A Town Square, City Hall Park and two small Neighborhood Parks create additional opportunities for physical activity and social connectedness. Uses within the Town Center include: mixed use, public/semi-public, and mixed residential. The Town Center shall be developed in compliance with the standards in the Zoning Ordinance and these guidelines. The entire Town Center is guided Mixed Use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This land use category would allow development in this area by Planned Unit Development (PUD). This district provides a variety of anticipated uses and the City developed the Town Center master plan as their preferred vision for the area; however, the City is willing to evaluate other uses provided that the spirit and intent of the Town Center master plan is preserved. Concept Areas Town Center 200 acres Downtown Core 40 acres Use Size (estimated) Mixed Use 440,000 sq. ft. Single Family Residential 150 units Townhomes 170 units Apartment/Condo 500 units Town Square Park 7 acres South Neighborhood Park 1.1 acres North Neighborhood Park 3.0 acres Linear Park 9.0 acres Town Center Development Potential: The concept developed for the new Town Center includes the following development potential: 28 | Town Center Buildings - Placement, Massing and Height The area and setback requirements shall be as noted in the Zoning Ordinance for the district in which the property is located, except that additional standards shall be required for the Downtown Core as noted elsewhere in this document. Placement of non-residential and multi-family residential structures should support a higher level of consideration as described in this section. Street Edge Requirement. A consistent street edge must be maintained at the right-of-way line along all street frontages. Street edge elements may consist of the primary building, low masonry walls, fences, landscaping or a combination of all of these elements. Zero Lot Line Buildings are encouraged within the Town Center and particularly in the Downtown Core. Building Frontage. At least 60% of the primary street linear frontage of each lot shall be occupied by a building at the required build-to line. Other portions of a building beyond the 60% may be set back farther than required by the build-to line. In addition, on corner lots, a minimum of the first 50 feet of the lot frontage on either side of a street intersection must be occupied by buildings set at the build to line. Parking or other space open to the sky is not allowed within this first 50 feet. The build-to line may be met either with an enclosed building or an arcade constructed with a permanent roof of the same materials as the remainder of the building. Height. Multi-story buildings (greater than two stories) built to the maximum heights permitted by zoning are encouraged. Stepping portions of upper stories back from the line of the front façade to provide areas for outdoor terraces and rooftop patios is encouraged. New single story commercial building types with flat roofs shall have a minimum cornice height of 20 feet to better define the street. Diagram of building frontage requirements for primary street and corner lot frontage. Reinforcement of the street edge with low walls and landscaping. Town Center | 29 Screening and Loading Ground Mounted Mechanical Equipment shall be fully screened and properly maintained with material similar to or compatible with material used on the main structure. Screened mechanical equipment shall not be located in the front side yard, but may be located at the side or rear yard. Trash and Recycling Storage areas shall be designed internal to the principal building and shall not be allowed in an external fenced structure. Trash and recycling storage area doors shall not be located on the primary front elevation of building, but may be located in the side or rear yard. Loading Areas and Docks shall be limited to the rear of the principal building and shall not be visible from the street. These areas shall be screened from adjacent residential areas by fencing, walls, or landscaping. Screening shall block views from public right-of-way or adjacent uses and shall be equally effective in winter and summer. Architectural screening and plantings minimize the visual impact of necessary but unappealing portions of this apartment building. 30 | Town Center Facades Facades for non-residential and multi-family residential structures should support a higher level of design as described in this section. Architectural Style shall not be restricted. However, Architectural Styles as described in Section Two are encouraged. Evaluation of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and on its relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions in these guidelines and the Zoning Ordinance. The architectural appearance, including building character, permanence, massing, composition, and scale of all principal buildings shall comply with the Master Plan. Franchise architecture (building design that is trademarked or identified with a particular chain or corporation and is generic in nature) is prohibited unless it employs a traditional storefront commercial style. Franchises or national chains shall follow these guidelines to create context-sensitive buildings that are sustainable in that they can be reused by other types of business. A - Entrances. The main entrance shall face the primary street with secondary entrances to the side or rear. In the case of a corner building or a building abutting more than one street, the City will determine which street should be considered primary. B - Appearance. All sides of buildings shall have an equal appearance in terms of materials and general design. C - Windows. At least 40% of the wall surface at the street side of the first story, non-residential, shall consist of clear windows and doors that allow a view into the working areas, lobbies or display areas. D - Roofs. Building facades that exceed 100 feet in length measured along the street frontage shall have variations in roofline or rooftop parapet. Rooftop equipment shall be concealed behind parapets or screened from the view of pedestrians. E - Elements. All buildings shall include the following elements: • Accent materials shall be wrapped around all walls; • Complementary major material colors. F - Articulation. Any exterior building wall adjacent to or visible from a public street, public open space, or abutting property may not exceed 40 feet in length without visual relief consisting of one or more of the following: • The facade shall be divided architecturally by means of significantly different materials or textures, or • Horizontal offsets of at least four feet in depth, or • Vertical offsets in the roofline of at least four feet, or • Fenestration at the first floor level which is recessed horizontally at least one foot into the facade. A/CCF D/F B/EA D/F Town Center | 31 G - Materials. Exterior building materials shall be classified either primary, secondary, or accent materials. Primary materials shall cover at least 60% of the facade of a building. Secondary materials may cover no more than 30% of the facade. Accent materials may include door and window frames, lintels, cornices, and other minor elements, and may cover no more than 10% of the facade. Allowable materials are as follows: • Primary exterior building materials may be brick, stone (natural or cultured) EIFS, stucco, architectural precast concrete or glass. Bronze tinted or mirror glass are prohibited as exterior materials. • Secondary exterior building materials may be any of the primary building materials above or decorative block, integrally colored stucco, or fiber cement siding (color impregnated or painted) in vertical panel design only with hidden seams. • Accent materials may be wood, metal or fiber cement when used in trim, fascia or soffit if appropriately integrated into the overall building design and not situated in areas which will be subject to physical or environmental damage. • All primary and secondary materials shall be integrally colored, except where otherwise stated. • Decorative block shall be colored only by means of a pigment integral to the block material, not applied to the surface. • Sheet metal, corrugated metal, iron, shakes, plain flat concrete block are not acceptable as exterior wall materials. 32 | Town Center Streets Walkability is a priority in the Town Center. All streets and crossings should be safe and accessible for pedestrians with enhancements to support low speed vehicular travel, on street parking, and adequate right-of-way for healthy tree canopy. Design components should include paving or striping of crosswalks, curb extensions, pedestrian level and roadway level lighting, tree lined boulevards. Bike lanes can be strategically incorporated on major east/west connectors via the, Bikeway Street type, to provide thoughtful bicycle routes between the County Road 116 linear park into the Town Center district neighborhoods and beyond. Sidewalks are required along all streets within the Town Center. The location and alignment of new sidewalks shall connect directly with adjacent existing networks. The width of the sidewalk shall be consistent with City policy and the design guidelines. Where the sidewalk along the public street is interrupted by a curb cut, the walkway across the driveway shall be delineated by elevated pavement or by use of contrasting pavement materials that meet ADA accessibility standards. Parking. On-street parking shall be incorporated with the street design within the Town Center. Parking zones shall be defined either by curbing or with a change in paving materials. Curb Cuts. The number and width of curb cuts shall be limited in conformance with City policy. Sites with multiple buildings shall have unified/joint access. Utility Installation. New utilities shall be placed underground. Compatible lines (e.g., electric, phone, cable) shall be placed in a common trench. Town Center | 33 Southeast District Street Types Type ROW Width County Road 120 feet Parkway Street 72 feet Main Street (Downtown Core)70 feet Connector Street 60 feet Local Street 50 feet 79th Place 79th Place 79th Avenue Main Street 76th Avenue Larkin Road C i t y C e n t e r D r i v e C i t y C e n t e r D r i v e Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Co u n t y R o a d 1 0 M a i n S t r e e t O a k L a n e M u l b e r r y L a n e L a r c h L a n e Ma p l e H i l l R o a d Good Sheperd Church City Hall 34 | Town Center Parking and Access No parking spaces shall be located on corner lots at the point of street intersections. In the Downtown Core, parking is desired to be located behind the buildings. Reductions. Per Section 1060.060 of the Zoning Ordinance parking may be reduced by: • Up to 20% of required off-street parking spaces in the case of shared parking between abutting uses or use of public parking. • One parking space for each on-street parking space provided at the lot frontage on a public street adjacent to the lot. Pedestrian Circulation. Clearly defined, safe pedestrian access shall be provided from parking areas, adjacent public rights-of-way, and public and private open space to building entrances. Pedestrian walkways traversing parking lots with more than 60 parking spaces shall meet the following guidelines: • Walkways adjacent to parking spaces shall be at least five feet wide and shall be separated from vehicles by curbing or landscaping. • Walkways that cross parking lot drive aisles shall be delineated by stripes, contrasting pavement materials, elevated pavement, or a combination of these measures. Bicycle Parking. Non-residential developments shall strive to provide bicycle parking spaces in a convenient, visible, preferably sheltered location. Town Center | 35 Landscaping and Screening Parking bays shall have landscape islands at each end, and bays in excess of 15 spaces in length shall be divided by intermediate islands. Landscape islands shall provide at least 360 square feet of area for planting trees, shrubs and/or groundcovers. Intermediate landscape islands shall provide at least 180 square feet of planting area. A landscape buffer of a minimum five feet in width shall be provided between all parking areas and the public sidewalk. The buffer shall consist of shade trees, low shrubs or perennial flowers and a decorative fence or masonry wall. Plantings and parking lot screen walls or fences shall be no less than three feet and no more than four feet in height to allow views into and out of parking areas All land area not occupied by buildings, parking, driveways, sidewalks or other hard surfaces shall be sodded or mulched and landscaped with approved ground cover, flowers, shrubbery and trees. Landscaping shall include a full complement of overstory, ornamental and evergreen trees, shrubbery and ground covers which are hardy and appropriate for the locations in which they are planted and provide year-long color and interest. Suggested Trees for the Town Center Valley Forge Elm, Ulmus americana ‘Valley Forge’ Bitternut Hickory, Carya cordiformis Sienna Glen Maple, Acer x freemanii ‘Sienna’ Boulevard Linden, Tilia americana ‘Boulevard’ Ohio Buckeye, Aesculus glabra Ginkgo (male), Gingko biloba Bicolor Oak, Quercus bicolor Northern Red Oak, Quercus rubra Princeton Elm, Ulmus americana ‘Princeton’ Accolade Elm, Ulmus x ‘Accolade’ River Birch (single stem), Betula nigra Korean Mountain Ash, Sorbus alnifolia Crabapple species (persistent fruit) Japanese Tree Lilac, Syringa reticulate 36 | Town Center Community Center The Town Center is intended to be a community gathering space. As such, the City may wish to allow space within the Town Center for a community center that could include recreational space, meeting space and similar uses. This would likely be a public/private partnership if it were to develop. This exhibit is intended to identify the two preferred locations for this type of facility and provide a concept for the size of facility that could be accommodated on either site. This is intended to serve an alternative to the land use concepts envisioned in the Town Center plan. Community Center Option A Community Center Option B Town Center | 37 Community Center Option A Site Area (Acres)14.1 Building Footprint (SF)80,500 Community Center Option B Site Area (Acres)23.0 Building Footprint (SF)1,001,408 Community Center Option B Community Center Option A 38 | Downtown Core Downtown Core Map: The Downtown Core is focused along Main Street and around a Town Square. Commercial mixed-use (which may include first floor commercial with residential above) is intended for a majority of the Downtown Core with medium and high-density residential uses supporting at the periphery. 79th Place M a i n S t r e e t M a i n S t r e e t C i t y C e n t e r D r i v e C i t y C e n t e r D r i v e C o u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Co u n t y R o a d 1 0 Downtown Core | 39 05 Downtown Core Overview The Downtown Core is the commercial and civic heart of Corcoran. It is bound by 79th Avenue on the north, County Road 10 on the south, County Road 116 on the west and City Center Drive on the east. This district is the six block Main Street area as shown on the Downtown Core master plan. It is intended to offer residents and visitors a central community place to serve their daily commercial and personal service needs, and to gather with their neighbors for civic celebrations and social events. Through these guidelines, the Downtown Core will focus public and private investments in a smaller geographic area to support a critical mass of high quality development and public realm amenities. Design requirements in this section are in addition to criteria set in the Downtown Mixed Use Zoning District and in these Guidelines. Where conflicts arise, this section shall prevail. Vision Downtown Corcoran is a walkable, identifiable place that reflects the unique character of the community. A mix of restaurants, shops, and services will make it possible to meet daily needs all within a walkable area of the city. This pedestrian scale, with a cohesive building and landscape appearance, will identify this area as uniquely Corcoran. Downtown Core Objectives: 1. Downtown Core maintains the unique heritage and history of Corcoran. 2. Downtown Core is where the community gathers. 3. Downtown Core provides safe, convenient access for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles. 4. Downtown Core provides the daily retail and service needs for the community. 5. Downtown Core is a mix of businesses, public spaces and residential neighborhoods that are connected by complementary design elements and streetscapes. 6. Downtown Core is a destination for the region. Site Development Destination retail, restaurant and entertainment uses, particularly mixed with other synergistic uses, are encouraged. Development should be appropriate for a traditional downtown area, with mixed-use buildings combining retail, commercial, and multi-family residential uses. Buildings - Placement, Massing and Height The area and setback requirements shall be as noted in the Zoning Ordinance for the district in which the property is located, except that additional standards shall be required for the Downtown Core as noted elsewhere in this document. Height. Buildings are required to be a minimum of two stories in the Downtown Core. Stepping portions of upper stories back from the line of the front façade to provide areas for outdoor terraces and rooftop patios is encouraged. 40 | Downtown Core Streetscape Trees and plantings Overstory trees should be placed with regularity along street frontages in order to create dapple shade within 10-15 years. Space and placement of trees, lighting and signage should be thoughtfully considered to create a unified whole supportive of Downtown Core goals. Furnishings Main Street is designed as a traditional downtown main street, lined with street trees and planters, pedestrian level lighting, and furnishings including benches and trash receptacles. These elements shall also occur within the Town Center, to a lesser extent. Outdoor Dining Pavement widths are wider in the Downtown Core than in other areas of the City in order to support the widest variety of streetscape amenities. Outdoor dining shall be permitted through the Downtown Core and shall be placed in the pedestrian buffer area of the sidewalk section. Awnings Where awnings are used, canvas, fabric or vinyl awnings are preferable. If glass or metal awnings are employed, they shall closely complement the building’s architectural character and aesthetic. The bottom of a window awning shall be set at least seven feet above the public sidewalk. Back lighted vinyl awnings and canopy signs shall not be used. Suggested Trees for the Downtown Core Princeton Elm, Ulmus americana ‘Princeton’ Accolade Elm, Ulmus x ‘Accolade’ Skyline Honeylocust, Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis ‘Skyline’ Valley Forge Elm, Ulmus americana ‘Valley Forge’ Boulevard Linden, Tilia americana ‘Boulevard’ Ohio Buckeye, Aesculus glabra Ginkgo (male), Ginkgo biloba Kentucky Coffeetree (male), Gymnocladus dioicus Japanese Tree Lilac, Syringa reticulate Thornless Cockspur Hawthorne, Crataegus crus-galli var. inermis Downtown Core | 41 Sidewalks and Boulevards County Road 116 and Main Street in the Downtown Core warrants a unique design treatment. This intersection will be developed as the entry into the Downtown Core with appropriate identity elements. The County Road 116 linear park will offer trails through a landscaped open space, which extends into the Downtown Core and greater Town Center. The City will continue to work with Hennepin County to ensure that the ultimate design of County Road 116 respects the City’s intention to develop a district that is safe and accessible for all modes of transportation, including walking and biking. Parking 1. No parking spaces shall be located on corner lots at the point of street intersections. 2. No parking spaces shall be located between the immediate front of the principal structure and the abutting front lot line. throughway frontagestreet parking lane pedestrian buffer building type & setback varies by zoning district right-of-way 42 | Downtown Core Public Art Public art is encouraged in the Downtown Core. Durable, safe, artful enhancements to furnishings, paving, signage and building facades are also encouraged. All locations and works of art, regardless of ownership, placed within the public rights of- way or public areas shall be approved by the City Council prior to installation. Downtown Core | 43 Signage Signage shall comply with Chapter 84 of the City Code. However, in the Downtown Core the City is open to considering more creative signage to reflect the energetic commercial/ entertainment uses that may be developed in the subdistrict. Decorative neon, moving or other decorative sign types are desirable when displayed within interior storefront windows. 44 | Downtown Core Plazas All properties with principal buildings in excess of 30,000 square feet shall be required to have a public plaza space. The public plaza space shall include benches, bike racks trash receptacles, lighting fixtures and other amenities to create a welcoming space for tenants of the building and members of the public. These plaza spaces should be visible from the public street. Implementation | 45 06 Implementation Introduction The design guidelines provide distinct strategies for guiding form and appearance. This vision will take several years to implement. Successful implementation will require consistent application of the Design Guidelines by City staff and City Council. Zoning enforcement and design guidelines will not succeed without the cooperation and commitment of landowners, development interests and the rest of the community. Changes to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map The Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines are consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed changes to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map will be undertaken as a separate action following adoption of these guidelines. Design Review The design guidelines will be administered by staff as part of the development review process. Staff will incorporate design review to ensure compliance with the design guidelines as a standard step in the development review process. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-35 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 10 (THE ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 18-014) WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to update Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance (Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines); and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards and City policies; and WHEREAS, the amendments reflect the Council’s vision for development of this area and provide guidance to landowners and developers; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the amendment based upon the finding that the proposed amendments would be consistent with State law and the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code. . VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schulz, Alan Schulz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise –Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-392 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2019-391 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 10 (THE ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 18-014) The text of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended to repeal and replace Chapter 10 (Zoning Ordinance), Appendix B (Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines). A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. AD OPTED by the City Council on the 25th day of April 2019. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schulz, Alan Schulz, Alan ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise –Administrative Services Director 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 17, 2019 for the April 25, 2019 City Council Meeting RE: City initiated Development Rights Program and Open Space & Preservation Ordinance Amendment (City File 18-014) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:N/A 1.Background Corcoran uses a development rights program as a method of managing development density in rural areas where municipal services are not planned and in Metropolitan Urban Service Areas (MUSA) where municipal services are planned but have not yet been provided. Council asked staff to review the development rights policy and the Open Space & Preservation Plat ordinance to understand opportunities for making it easier for property owners to develop their land. September 28th Council Work Session Summary At the September 28th City Council meeting, the Council directed staff to modify the development rights program to allow 1 unit per 10 acres regardless of street pavement status. The Council also spent considerable time discussing OS&P options. Generally, the Council agreed the basic concepts in the program should be maintained, but further discussion was warranted on several issues including: •Street standards (pavement required? Curb & gutter or add a new standard for public streets with ditches?) •Open Space preservation – permanent or until municipal sewer are provided? •Consider different standards for OS&P developments in the UR district versus the RR district •Should they require a rezoning to PUD or allow as a CUP with standards? •How much open space should be required to be preserved and how much should be upland (not wetland)? •Sidewalks are currently required in all subdivisions—should the City have different standards in the RR district (standard and/or OS&P)? •How do we preserve significant natural features and other important land areas? October 11th Council Work Session Summary Staff presented a redlined version of the Zoning Ordinance development rights standards to allow 1 unit per 10 acres regardless of pavement status. The Council indicated support for the change and clarified that the change would be based on the existing development rights and simply assuming that the development rights were increased as if the street changed from gravel to paved (which multiplied the Agenda Item:8e. Ordinance Amendment – DR and OSP (City File 18-014) 2 April 25, 2019 existing development rights by 3 to reflect the change from 1 per 30 to 1 per 10) rather simply 1 per 10 based on today’s lot size, which would result in a reset of the entire program. There was considerable discussion about street standards. Staff indicated that they do not support a change to the pavement section. Council indicated that they would be willing to consider a ditch section for developments in the RR district. Staff noted that the Subdivision Ordinance and Engineering Standards require sidewalks on one side of all streets, however, the Council indicated a willingness to consider waiving that requirement for developments in the RR district. The draft ordinance amendment continues to require developments inside the MUSA in the UR district have sidewalks and curb and gutter on the streets but does not require that in RR district. The Council discussed the need to ensure that these developments are preserving natural resources and prime farm land in meaningful ways. January 24th Council Work Session Summary Staff presented a redlined version of the OS&P Ordinance that allowed a street section with ditches, eliminated permanent preservation for most areas and increased the open space requirement to 50%. The draft also clarified language to better meet Council goals. The Council indicated support for the draft ordinance with one change to allow for permanent preservation of the high-quality natural resources in the City. 2. Planning Commission Review Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing at their regularly scheduled April 4, 2019 meeting. No one spoke at the public hearing. Commissioners asked questions on how the development rights were calculated and the permanent preservation areas. Commissioner Theis asked why Section 940.050, Subd. 1.C. (Water and sewer systems) remained in the draft ordinance when we no longer give density bonuses for shared systems. Staff noted that this section references individual and shared systems. It gives discretion to the Council to allow shared systems or not and staff recommends retaining this section to provide options for landowners and the Council. The Planning Commission voted 4-0-1 (Theis abstained) to recommend approval of the proposed changes with revisions to correct errors, which are reflected in the attached ordinances. 3. Analysis of Request Development Rights Program Corcoran’s development rights program was developed with the intention of managing development in rural areas and areas where municipal services are planned but have not yet been provided. Within the MUSA, developments that are planned for City services are restricted according to minimum lot sizes outlined in the Zoning Ordinance and density standards identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The development rights program is unusual--cities manage density through minimum lot sizes. In Corcoran, the number of lots created outside the MUSA that are not planned for City services are restricted by the number of development rights. Historically, the development rights program has been Ordinance Amendment – DR and OSP (City File 18-014) 3 April 25, 2019 more difficult to administer than a minimum lot size and tracking has been a challenge over the years due to inconsistent record-keeping at City Hall. However, landowners have been operating under this system for more than 30 years and it does allow more flexibility than a minimum lot size when development is proposed. The Council discussed this and agreed to keep the development rights program. However, the Council discussed whether or not the different development rights (one development right per 30 acres on a gravel road and one development right per 10 acres on a paved road) were incentivizing paving as some previous Council’s may have hoped. After much discussion, the Council directed staff to change the ordinance to allow one development right per 10 acres. Council directed staff that the change to the development rights would be based on the existing development rights and simply assuming that the development rights were increased as if the street changed from gravel to paved rather than 1 per 10 based on today’s lot size. The development rights map was adjusted using this method for the existing development rights on a property. An example of the calculation is outlined below: 8100 Strehler Road – three existing development rights; 1. This parcel has an existing home. 2. Under the one per 30 acres calculation, the property would have had 6 development rights in addition to the existing home. It appears that three parcels were subdivided from the property, which leaves the three development rights. 3. Three development rights is multiplied by three for the assumption of a paved road. This gives nine development rights. 4. The nine development rights is decreased by one for the existing household on the property to provide a total of eight development rights. 5. It appears that if the development rights were increased using a calculation based on the existing acreage for all properties with existing development rights the example property would have; a. 183.43 acres / 10 = 18 development rights 6. The formula was created so as not to give “extra” development rights to parcels that have already used development rights while still increasing development rights on property . If there is a dispute about the development rights shown on the map, the landowner can appeal to the City Council by showing how the number is incorrect. The ordinance amendment makes this change to the City Code and the attached map shows how the change will impact specific properties. While the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendments as recommended by staff, as staff evaluated the questions raised on the development rights map we believe there is more analysis required to update the map. We have provided information above detailing the calculation used to create the draft development rights map. However, the simple multiplication method recommended by staff and Council resulted in more “winners and losers” than originally anticipated. Staff recommends that the Council adopt the draft map by reference and direct staff to review each parcel and analyze the existing development rights and determine development rights on a lot by lot basis as we would if the road in front of the parcel was paved. Staff will bring back an updated map for Council approval. Ordinance Amendment – DR and OSP (City File 18-014) 4 April 25, 2019 Open Space & Preservation Ordinance OS&P plats are allowed by right in the RR and UR zoning districts. This means that the developer has a three-step subdivision process: a. Sketch Plan review b. Preliminary Plat c. Final Plat However, if the developer does not comply with the standards in the OS&P ordinance, they must apply for a PUD, which requires the following steps: a. Sketch Plan review b. Rezoning to PUD, preliminary PUD development plan, Preliminary Plat c. Final Plat and Final PUD development Plan Density Bonuses The Metropolitan Council provides regional planning for the 7-County Metropolitan Area and they have designated Corcoran as “Diversified Rural”, which are areas located adjacent to Emerging Suburban Edge of MUSA where the region will “protect rural land for rural lifestyles today and potential urbanized levels of development sometime after 2040”. At the May 18, 2017 Comprehensive Plan Work Session, the City Council directed staff to accept this designation for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan efforts. The current OS&P Ordinance does not comply with the Metropolitan Council policies for the Diversified Rural Areas, which does not allow for permanent preservation of land. The OS&P ordinance allows land to be temporarily or permanently preserved, and the developer is essentially allowed to develop at a greater density than 1 unit per 10 acres. While the Metropolitan Council’s policies support increased clustered density, they do not support permanent preservation of land. Metropolitan Council allows increased density via a “Flexible Development” policy. The reasoning behind this is that if the property owner chooses to subdivide the property with temporary preservation, further development of land is possible on the land in the future. This strategy gives the community and land owners the option to allow land to be preserved for future development and immediate preservation of natural resources. The draft ordinance recommends conservation and preservation of the open space until municipal sewer and water are available and then allowing subdivision of the open space, with the exception of high-quality natural communities. This would be consistent with the intent of both the City and Metropolitan Council policies to preserve land until sewer and water is available. Street Standards In 2004, the City Council adopted new Subdivision and Zoning standards which were intended to encourage quality development and establish minimum development standards. As part of that discussion, the Council affirmed that all new public streets would be paved. However, there was some discussion about street standards. Ordinance Amendment – DR and OSP (City File 18-014) 5 April 25, 2019 The Public Works Director recommends no changes to the street section, which we believe is the minimum standard to ensure that the pavement and road bed survive with minimal maintenance. However, the Council indicated some support for ditch sections rather than curb and gutter to manage storm water. It is staff’s opinion that this does not always save the developer money (it will vary based on site constraints) and it will increase city maintenance costs. However, we have drafted an ordinance that allows that as an option in the RR district with increased density bonuses for developers who do provide curb and gutter as that has a lower long-term cost to the City. The City has developed a new rural street section and this option would allow ditches but would require that the right-of-way be increased from 60 feet to 80 feet to accommodate the ditch section. A draft of this section is attached to this report for review. Different standards in UR and RR The draft ordinance continues to require sidewalks and curb and gutter for developments in the UR district but does not require them in the RR district. With a potential for increased density and future extension of municipal sewer and water that warrant an urban street section with curb and gutter and sidewalks a density bonus is included in the draft ordinance to encourage these improvements. Open Space Standards The current Ordinance allows property owners to increase their development rights if they develop under the City’s Open Space & Preservation (OS&P) Ordinance. Under this Ordinance the developer may double or triple the number of units allowed on a site. The current ordinance (approved in 2011) requires that only 25% of the land on the property be preserved (permanently or temporarily) as open space, with 50% of dedicated open space preserved as upland. However, the City’s original OS&P ordinance required 50% open space preservation. The draft ordinance includes reinstating the development standards from the previous ordinance to encourage preservation of significant natural resources or restoration of land per the Council discussion. This is included in the draft ordinance and is consistent with the prior standards that Corcoran’s two existing OS&P neighborhoods developed under. The City has approved three OS&P developments: • Summerhill (on Willow Drive), which has 52% open space • Meadow Creek Estates (north of Tessmer Road and west of County Road 19), which has 50% open space • Refuge at Rush Creek (south County Road 117), which has been approved, but not built and has 32.4% open space. While this is less than the 75% open space recommended by the Metropolitan Council Flexible Residential Development policy, the 50% open space is consistent with what was required for the two existing OS&P developments. Ordinance Amendment – DR and OSP (City File 18-014) 6 April 25, 2019 Summary The City Council has discussed the proposed changes over a series of work sessions. Staff believes that the revisions will simplify the process for developers and provide additional development options while still protecting the opens spaces and natural features valued by Corcoran residents. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the ordinance amendments as drafted, which includes the updated Development Rights Map and direct staff to proceed with a parcel-by-parcel analysis of the development rights map. The updated map will be presented to the Council for adoption at a future meeting, but this allows landowners who are currently looking at development to proceed under the new ordinance and provides time to complete a more thorough review of some unique situations. 4. Recommendation Move to direct staff to further evaluate the development rights map and adopt the following: a. Ordinance Amendment 2019-393 related to Development Rights b. Ordinance Amendment 2019-394 related to Open Space and Preservation Plats c. Resolution 2019-36 approving findings of fact for Ordinance amendment related to Development Rights d. Resolution 2019-37 approving findings of fact for Ordinance amendment related to Open Space and Preservation Plats e. Summary Ordinance 2019-395 Attachments 1. Ordinance Amendment 2019-393 related to Development Rights 2. Ordinance Amendment 2019-394 related to Open Space and Preservation Plats 3. Resolution 2019-36 approving findings of fact for Ordinance amendment to Development Rights 4. Resolution 2019-37 approving findings of fact for Ordinance amendment related to Open Space and Preservation Plats 5. Summary Ordinance 2019-395 6. Revised DRAFT Development Rights Map 7. Proposed Rural and Urban Street Sections for OS&P 8. Summerhill Preliminary Plat 9. Meadow Creek Estates Preliminary Plat 10. Refuge at Rush Creek Preliminary Plat City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-393 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 1040 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (CITY FILE 18-014) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1040.020 Subd. 8 “Urban Reserve District (UR)” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 8. Density Requirements. This Section identifies the maximum number of residential units or non-residential units that may be developed. The development rights program is intended to preserve a rural residential environment with active agri-businesses. Development rights shall be calculated based on the total lot area and rounded to the nearest whole number. Development rights shall be as recorded on the official City of Corcoran “Development Rights Map” on file at City Hall. A. Landowners shall be permitted one development right for each 10 acres of land accessing onto a paved roadway. B. Landowners shall be permitted one development right for each 30 acres of land accessing onto a gravel road. C. The existing farmstead or residence on properties accessing onto gravel roads and eligible for Agricultural Preserve is exempt from the density calculations in rural areas, if the farmstead or residence existed prior to July 1, 1981 and the subject parcel is a minimum of 40 acres in size. The minimum lot area may be reduced from 40 acres to 35 acres if the parcel is a quarter-quarter parcel reduced from the standard 40-acre quarter- quarter parcel due to public road right-of-way or a perturbation in the rectangular survey system. D.B. Additional development rights may be granted to landowners that develop the property as part of an Open Space Preservation plat, as permitted by the Subdivision Regulations. E.C. No lots or outlots shall be allowed to be created without development rights, except in the following circumstances: City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 2 of 3 1. When approved as part of an Open Space and Preservation (OS&P) Plat as allowed by Section 940 of the Subdivision Ordinance, 2. When approved as part of a clustering option as allowed by Subd. 7 of this Section., or 3. When the property is located on a gravel road where future paving would increase the development rights on the property. The following conditions apply to any such subdivision: a. No lots shall be allowed to be created without development rights. b. No more than one outlot shall be created without development rights. c. The landowner shall provide the City with written direction about how future development rights would be applied to the outlot and any lots. d. The landowner shall prepare a restrictive covenant that shall be reviewed and approved by City and filed against the property indicating that the outlot is not buildable until additional development rights are obtained through paving of the adjacent street. SECTION 2. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1040.030 Subd. 7 “Rural Residential District (RR)” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 7. Density Requirements. This Section identifies the maximum number of residential units or non-residential units that may be developed. The development rights program is intended to preserve a rural residential environment with active agri-businesses. Development rights shall be calculated based on the total lot area and rounded to the nearest whole number. Development rights shall be as recorded on the official City of Corcoran “Development Rights Map” on file at City Hall. A. Landowners shall be permitted one development right for each 10 acres of land accessing onto a paved roadway. B. Landowners shall be permitted one development right for each 30 acres of land accessing onto a gravel road. C. The existing farmstead or residence on properties accessing onto gravel roads and eligible for Agricultural Preserve is exempt from the density calculations in rural areas, if the farmstead or residence existed prior to July 1, 1981 and the subject parcel is a minimum of 40 acres in size. The minimum lot area may be reduced from 40 acres to 35 acres if the parcel is a quarter-quarter parcel reduced from the standard 40-acre quarter- quarter parcel due to public road right-of-way or a perturbation in the rectangular survey system. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 3 of 3 D.B. Additional development rights may be granted to landowners that develop the property as part of an Open Space Preservation plat, as permitted by the Subdivision Regulations. 1.C. No lots or outlots shall be allowed to be created without development rights, except in the following circumstances:When approved as part of an Open Space and Preservation (OS&P) Plat as allowed by Section 940 of the Subdivision Ordinance., 1. When the property is located on a gravel road where future paving would increase the development rights on the property. The following conditions apply to any such subdivision: a. No lots shall be allowed to be created without development rights. b. No more than one outlot shall be created without development rights. c. The landowner shall provide the City with written direction about how future development rights would be applied to the outlot and any lots. d. The landowner shall prepare a restrictive covenant that shall be reviewed and approved by City and filed against the property indicating that the outlot is not buildable until additional development rights are obtained through paving of the adjacent street. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 25th day of April 2019. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schulz, Alan Schulz, Alan ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota REVISED ORDINANCE NO. 2019-394 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 940 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO OPEN SPACE AND PRESERVATION PLATS (CITY FILE 18-014) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 940 “Open Space and Preservation (OS&P) Plats” (Subdivision Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: See attached Exhibit A SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 25th day of April 2019. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schulz, Alan Schulz, Alan ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 2 EXHIBIT A SECTION 940 – OPEN SPACE AND PRESERVATION (OS&P) PLATS 940.010 – PURPOSE OF DIVISION. The purpose of Open Space and Preservation plats (OS&P) is to minimize acreage used in developments that are approved prior to availability of urban services and to improve and preserve wildlife habitat, quality of life and land values within the City through economic incentives to preserve high quality woodlands, interconnected vegetated corridors, agricultural land, open space, and other significant natural features as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. OS&P plats provide owners within the Rrural residential Residential and Urban Reserve zoning districts with added flexibility in designing plats as well as incentives to voluntarily protect, preserve, enhance or restore natural resources on their property. OS&P Plats includes three application types beyond the basic development type, based on the amount of permanently preserved open space. Each application type includes some development right bonus. In addition to encouraging natural resource preservation and restoration, OS&P plats are intended as a means of facilitating an orderly and economically viable transition to eventual development with urban services. 940.020 – OBJECTIVES OF DIVISION AND DEFINITIONS. Subd. 1. The objectives of this division are to: A. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. B. Preserve permanent natural habitat and vegetated corridors for the shelter and movement of diverse wildlife. C. Preserve viable tracts of land for long-term agricultural use. D. Allow greater flexibility in the design of residential developments in order to create a more esthetically pleasing visual impact than standard development, particularly along arterial roadways and with respect to abutting properties. E. Create cohesive neighborhoods to establish local identity and increase community interaction. F. Reduce the costs of future public roadstreet and utility infrastructure through by designing to improve the efficiency of future connections and minimize site restoration costs associated with future utility construction. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 3 G. Provide economic incentives to land owners to preserve, protect and/or restore high quality woodlots and other identified natural resources areas. H. Accomplish the objectives of the comprehensive plan in a voluntary manner through the use of incentives. 940.030 APPLICATION TYPES. Subd. 1. OS&P plats are subject to the standards in this section, which provides additional development rights in exchange for preservation of natural features and creation of a higher quality development than might otherwise be expected.Four application types are available, three of which are an OS&P development with development right bonuses as indicated below: 1. Standard Plat: 100% of development rights. A. OS&P with no permanent preservation or restoration: Lots clustered and in acceptable lot sizes to accommodate private septic system and a minimum of 25% of gross land area shall be preserved or restored and of that 50% shall be upland area. = 150% of development rights. B. OS&P with permanent preservation and or restoration: Lots clustered and in acceptable lot sizes to accommodate private septic system and a minimum of 25% of gross land area shall be preserved or restored and of that 50% shall be upland area. = 200% of development rights. C. OS&P with permanent preservation and or restoration and other provisions as required in “C” with community well and septic under a PUD = 300% of development rights Subd 2. Lands within the Greenway corridor as identified on the Nnatural resource Resource Inventory or Ecologically Significant Natural Area maps in the Comprehensive Plan qualify for OS&P plats. The boundaries of the land identified in the maps may be modified by the City based on individual site characteristics. Other areas have been identified as target areas by the City within the MUSA and in rural residential areas. These areas are indicated on overlay natural resource maps attached to the Comprehensive Plan. A parcel outside one of these categories may apply for permanent preservation or restoration and, if the proposed permanent preservation or restoration is approved by the City, receive the applicable development right bonus as approved by the City. Preservation and restoration areas shall follow the City’s adopted Design Standards for Preservation and Restoration lands. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 4 Subd. 3. Any Application type can develop in stages based on the approved plat. Subd. 4. A Planned Unit Development (PUD) will be required for any application type that proposes a deviation from minimum lot size standards and/or the use of off-lot septic or well or community septic or well. 940.040 – PROCEDURE. Subd. 1. All procedures for a standard subdivision as provided in Section 930 and Section 935 of the Subdivision Ordinance shall be followed for each type of open space preservation plat application, with the addition of the following: A. A pre-application meeting with the City and potential easement holders in order for all parties to be made fully aware of any procedures, policies, or other issues regarding the plat. B. A sketch/concept plan shall be required that includes the following: 1. Classification by wetland type and acreage of all wetlands with and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the boundary lines of such plat. 2. Vegetation of the site (pasture, woodlands, hedgerows, etc.) including a general description of species of trees and a summary of the approximate percent of each species and their size and stage of maturity. 3. An outline of the land area to be designated as open space and its proposed use as park, trail, temporary open space, permanent preserve or restoration, or wastewater treatment area. C. Data for preliminary plat. All information required to be submitted in Section 930 is required to be submitted with any OS&P application, with the addition of the following: 1. A resource inventory presented on an aerial photograph at a scale of no less than one inch equals 200 feet, including the following: a. Vegetation inventory identifying the general cover types defining boundaries of woodland areas and identifying stand-alone trees of a size and species identified in the City preservation and restoration standards as significant. b. Trees or wooded areas to be removed for streets, drives, buildings, drainage or other purposes shall be identified. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 5 c. Visual resources, showing views onto the tract from surrounding roadstreets and public areas, as well as views within the tract. d. Description of the historic character of buildings and structures, historically important landscapes, and known archeological features. e. Context, including general outlines of existing buildings, land uses, and natural features such as water bodies or wooded areas, roadstreets and property boundaries within 100 feet of the tract. 2. A calculation of the proposed open space or preservation plat density as determined by Section 940.070. 3. A narrative from the applicant as to the rationale behind the proposed layout and open space. 4. An itemized list of all documents, agreements and actions necessary to be completed prior to recording of the plat, including land area to be protected with a conservation easement as open space or park dedication, the number and size of lots, areas proposed for stormwater management and sewage treatment areas (primary and secondary). This shall include all applicable Homeowners' association documents (if any), including bylaws, deed restrictions, covenants, and proposed conservation easements, prepared or approved by the holder of the conservation easement. 940.050 – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Subd. 1. OS&P or restoration plats shall comply with the following minimum standards: A. Land area. 1. Minimum gross acreage is determined based on a wastewater treatment plan. On-site treatment will require appropriate setbacks and a primary and secondary wastewater treatment/disposal site. 2. Under an OS&P with no permanent preservation or restoration, land not used in the development may be retained by the owner and any successor in interest, subject to a covenant with the City that such land may not be developed until such time as urban sewer service is provided and at such time shall be subject to development standards City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 6 with urban densities. Continued agricultural use shall be permitted until such time as sewer and water are available and orderly urban development occurs. 3. Under an OS&P plat a minimum of 2550% percent of the gross land area (of no more than two pieces) of the development site shall be dedicated as preserved open space (either temporary or permanent). Permanent oOpen space must be protected by a conservation easement or deed restrictions in favor of the city. Of that amount, 50 percent (net 12.525%) shall be upland area. Wetland restoration (including abandonment of legally tiled areas) will be credited towards the 12.5% upland. One acre of restored wetland shall equal one acre of upland. B. Open space development standards. Open space to be permanently preserved or restored within an OS&P plan shall meet the following criteria: 1. Open space shall be in a contiguuouscontiguous, connected configuration including or adjacent to existing natural areas or parks. 2. Open space shall be maintained free of noxious weeds, litter or debris. 3. Open spaces shall be protected by the placement of a conservation easement, covenant or deed restriction in favor of the City over the open space. a. For areas designated as high quality by the Natural Resource Inventory or Ecologically Significant Natural Area maps in the Comprehensive Plan, the conservation easement shall be permanent. 2.b. For all other areas, Tthe conservation easement shall remain in place until municipal sewer and water are available to serve the site. At such time, the open space may be developed in accordance with the regulations in place at that time. 3.4. Open space shall be owned by an individual, a homeowners' association, the City or other legal entity that will use the land for open space purposes pursuant to a conservation easement or covenant restricting additional development until urban services are provided (only applies to open space in excess of required 25%). In the case of private ownership of open space where public access is desired, such as a trail crossing or other public purpose, the City shall require that a public easement be provided over the open space area. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 7 4.5. In the event that it is impossible to locate sufficient suitable building sites to use the development rights generated by the property and plat design, such rights may be transferred to an adjacent property, within the city, so long as the development rights are used in a development that also follows open space development standards and does not exceed a 35% increase in development intensity compared to the property without transferred-in development rights. A PUD will be required for any OS&P desiring to transfer development rights. 5.6. A preservation, restoration and management plan agreeable to the City shall be prepared and filed for open space land. This plan shall include areas proposed for interim agricultural uses as well as permanent temporary open space easements. a. The City Council may, at its discretion, require financial guarantees of performance of restoration, seeding, cutting or planting. b. Where land remains in the ownership of the developer or an association, the City may inspect the property at any time to ensure that provisions of the management plan are being implemented. c. The City shall adopt a model restoration and management plan that may be adapted as appropriate to each situation. C. Water and sewer systems. 1. Water may be provided by individual on-site wells, or by one or more community wells in open space areas, meeting all State Department of Health requirements. 2. Individual sewage treatment systems are required to be located on each individual lot, except as otherwise approved by the City Council. The developer must identify both primary and secondary locations for City planning review. Permitting of individual septic systems shall be through Hennepin County. Individual sewage systems shall not be located on land with permanent preservation or restoration easements or land dedicated to the City. 3. The City may approve a centralized wastewater treatment system and smaller individual lots as part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), provided the applicant can show compliance with MPCA standards and the City finds that the proposal would comply with PUD City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 8 standards, all City requirements and would have no adverse impact on the environment or neighboring properties. The City will review the following information as part of the plan review, but all permitting shall be as required by the State of Minnesota. Centralized wastewater treatment systems may be located in temporarily restricted open space within an easement. This area shall not be included in the land area designated as preserved or restored open space. A sewage treatment system management plan must be submitted to the city that must be reviewed and approved prior to being recorded with the final plat. The plan shall clearly identify the following: a. The applicant must provide the following information to support the proposed primary and secondary septic sites: i. Hydrologic study prepared by a qualified individual for the proposed septic site. ii. A minimum of 4 soil borings on each primary septic site and 2 soil borings on each secondary site. iii. Percolation tests for the primary septic site. iv. Well locations for the proposed development. b. The applicant must provide a management (maintenance, replacement and repair) plan for centralized wastewater treatment system as approved by the City. The management plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Council and recorded with the final plat. The plan should clearly identify the following: i. The ownership of the centralized wastewater treatment system. ii. An annual schedule for maintenance, inspection and monitoring of the centralized wastewater treatment system. iii. Assignment of responsibility for the management of and payment for the centralized wastewater treatment system. iv. Contingency plan in the event of failure of the centralized wastewater treatment. v. Financial guarantees, covering the estimated cost of maintaining and replacing a centralized system. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 9 vi. Provisions describing how the sewage treatment portion of the system will be protected from vehicles, animals, humans and other sources of risk. vii. The name and license number of the system's designer. viii. Provision for cost effective future connection of the wastewater treatment system(s) to urban services within one year after such services are provided at the boundary of the development, with sufficient financial guarantees to ensure no added cost to the City. ix. If financial guarantees for any of the above provisions are part of an association assessment or treasury fund, the City shall be given access to annual audit records, at the expense of the association, to ensure proper funding. If such guarantees are the private responsibility of the developer, the City shall require guarantees from the responsible individual(s). D. Dimensional regulations and Development standards. The dimensional regulations for open space preservation plats must comply with standards of the underlying zoning district, but may vary from the underlying zoning district dimensional regulations provided they comply with the following standards: 1. Minimum lot size. There is no minimum lot size. The applicant must provide information to show that a primary and secondary septic site can fit on the site or on adjacent property in compliance with ordinance requirements. 2. The maximum lot area of each created lot shall not exceed two times the minimum lot area for a single family dwelling in the zoning district that is compatible with the land use category in which the property is located. 3. Building setbacks. The minimum building setbacks shall be as follows: a. Front: Front line of home shall be within 75’ of front property line25 feet (unless adjacent to an arterial streetMajor Roadway, which has minimum setback of 100 feet from major roads. Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander Roadways and A Minor Connector as shown on the 2030 City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 10 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.). b. Side, internal: 15 10 feet. c. Side, street: 25 feet. d. Rear: 25 feet. 4. Maximum impervious surface. Maximum impervious surface within each lot shall be 25 percent. 45. Variations from the dimensional requirements for lot size, setbacks or impervious surface may be approved with a PUD if the City Council finds that the request is consistent with the PUD standards. 65. Street standards. Street standards shall comply with this article. a. OS&P plats in the UR zoning district shall comply with urban street standards, which include curb and gutter and sidewalks within the right-of-way and shall be permitted to develop at 200% of the existing development rights. b. OS&P plats in the RR zoning district may be permitted to use the rural street standards. i. OS&P plats in RR district that choose to develop with rural street section shall be permitted to develop at 150% of the existing development rights. ii. OS&P plats that choose to develop with the urban street section shall be permitted to develop at 200% of the existing develop at 200% of the existing development rights. 76. Accessory structures (such as gazebos, benches and play equipment) shall be allowed on preserved open space lots without a principal structure as provided for in the developer's agreement and approved by the City Council. 87. A buffer zone of at least 100 feet shall be provided at the perimeter of the developed area of the site abutting public streets. The buffer zones shall be thickly planted with native grasses, shrubs and trees to minimize land use conflicts. E. Development design guidelines applicable to all OS&P developments with no permanent preservation of open space: City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 11 1. All lots shall be clustered in a manner to create temporary open space that will be held in a covenant for future development at the time sewer is extended. 2. The temporary open space shall be contiguous land, or adjacent to a similarly classified property, in order to facilitate future development. 3. A ghost plat shall be designed for all temporary open space areas at the same time as the Preliminary and Final plat is review and approved. The ghost plats shall indicate future access, internal roadstreet network and connections and future lot layout. 4. All lots shall front a paved roadstreet, internal to the site. F. Development design guidelines applicable to all OS&P developments with permanent preservation or restoration of open space. Residential lots should be designed to achieve as many of the following objectives as possible: 1. Arrange lots around a central focal point such as: a. A central green, boulevard or square. b. A physical amenity such as a meadow, a stand of trees, a stream or water body, or some other natural feature. 2. Locate lots such that at least 50 percent of the lots within a neighborhood abut open space, or other amenity, on at least one side. A local street may separate lots from open space. 3. Preserve views from each building unit and from off-site vantage points to the maximum possible. 4. Locate neighborhood recreational open spaces such that they are an integral part of the neighborhood, are suitable for the projected demographic makeup of residents, are at an elevation appropriate to their intended recreational use, have boundaries that are clearly defined and are accessible to all neighborhood residents from a public street or trail. Connect individual home sites with pedestrian corridors or sidewalks to larger open spaces and places of destination on-site and off-site. Open spaces should be accessible to pedestrians at roughly 1,200-foot intervals along public roadways. Pedestrian corridors between lots shall be at least 50 feet in width and buffered from view of adjacent properties. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 12 5. Locate lots to preserve woodlands, farmland or other natural features or character, including places of historic, archeological or cultural value. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan to the maximum extent possible in a contiguous, connected configuration. Natural open spaces may include, but are not limited to, fields, wetlands, slopes, bluffs, woods, lakes, ponds, streams, shore lands, and other environmentally sensitive areas. 6. Providing covenants to create an architectural theme to include items such as landscaping, porches, side or rear loaded or detached garages. A written narrative describing the architectural theme shall be provided with the preliminary plat. 7. Locate houses and garages such that the garages do not dominate the streetscape. 8. Locate septic systems on the most suitable soils for subsurface septic disposal and in such manner as to provide for cost effective and least disruptive future connection of the wastewater treatment system(s) to urban services. 9. Landscape common areas and street rights-of-way with native vegetation with high wildlife conservation value. 940.060 – OWNERSHIP OF COMMON AREAS. Subd. 1. Operation and maintenance requirements for residential subdivision common open space facilities shall be as provided in this division. Where certain land areas or structures are provided within the subdivision for private recreational use or as common service facilities or centralized wastewater treatment systems, the owner of such land and buildings shall provide covenants as approved by the City to ensure their continued operation and maintenance to a predetermined reasonable standard. These common areas may be placed under the ownership of one of the following, depending upon which is more appropriate in the discretion of the city: A. Dedicated to the public where a community-wide use would be anticipated; or B. Subdivider's ownership and control; or C. Homeowners' associations. A homeowners' association shall be established to maintain all permanently preserved open space and recreational facilities, except in cases where the land is dedicated to the City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 13 City for public purposes. Such homeowners' association management agreements shall be established prior to the sale of any lots. Homeowners' association management agreements shall include the following: 1. The agreement shall include a legal description of the common lands, facilities and permanent open space or conservation areas. 2. The permanent open space restrictions must be in perpetuity and not for a specific term of years. 3.2. Membership in the association shall be mandatory for all purchasers of homes in the development and their successors. 4.3. The agreement shall include restrictions placed upon the use and enjoyment of the lands or facilities, including the persons or entities entitled to enforce the restrictions. 5.4. The agreement shall include a mechanism for resolving disputes among the owners or association members. 6.5. The agreement shall provide standards for scheduled maintenance of open spaces, buildings and facilities. The association must be responsible for liability insurance and local taxes, 7.6. The agreement shall provide a plan guaranteeing continuing maintenance of open spaces that shall be submitted to the city council as part of the data requirements for an open space development. 8.7. The agreement shall include a mechanism to assess and enforce the common expenses for the land or facilities, including upkeep and maintenance expenses, real estate taxes and insurance premiums. 9.8. The agreement shall include the conditions and timing of the transfer of ownership and control of land or facilities to the association or the common ownership. 10.9. The homeowners must pay their pro rata share of associated costs and the assessment levied by the association shall become a lien on the property in accordance with the law; and 11.10. The association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed circumstances and needs City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 14 12.11. Any proposed change in the articles of association or incorporation shall require the prior written approval of the City. 13.12. Any other matters the developer or City deems appropriate shall be included. 940.070 – CALCULATION OF BASE DENSITY; DENSITY BONUSES. Subd. 1. To calculate the allowed density for a given parcel for open space preservation plat purposes, the following shall apply: A. OS&P Plats (all application types) must provide paved access within the site and must require all owners and their successors to covenant that they will participate at 100% of the per unit cost of future assessments for paving to City standards the principal roadsstreets outside of the development boundaries and servicing the site, if those roadstreets are not currently paved. B. Development rights shall be as recorded on the official City of Corcoran “Development Rights Map” and as described in Section 1040.020, Subd. 8 and 1040.030, Subd. 7 (Density Requirements) of the Zoning Ordinance. C. Multiply the number of development rights on the parcel by the percent based on the application type to determine the maximum number of lots. Percentages are as follows: 1. Standard Plat: = 100% of development rights (1 in 10 or 1 in 30one development right per 10 acres) 2. OS&P design indesign in the RR district with no permanent preservation or restorationrural street section = 150% 3. OS&P with permanent preservation and or restorationwith urban street =section = 200% 4. OS&P with community well and septic (subject to PUD) = 300% . Example 1: Gross land area consisting of approximately 46 acres and one development right per 10 acres in a 1 in 10 density district. Standard Plat: 46 x 1 (100% of development rights) = 4.6 development rights which is rounded up to 5. City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 15 OS&P in the RR district with rural street sectionwith no permanent dedication = (46/10) x 1.5 (150% of development rights) = 6.9 development rights which is rounded up to 7. OS&P in the UR district or in the RR district with urban street sectionwith permanent dedication = (46/10) x 2.0 (200% of development rights) = 9.2 development rights, which rounds down to 9. OS&P with permanent dedication and community well and septic = (46/10) x 3.0 (300% of development rights) = 13.8 development rights, which rounds up to 14. Maximum density = 46/914 = 1 in 5.113.29 Example 2: Gross land area consisting of approximately 60 acres in a 1 in 10 density districtand one development right per 10 acres. Standard Plat: 6 x 1 (100% of development rights) = 6 development rights OS&P in the RR district with rural street section with no permanent dedication = (60/10) x 1.5 (150% of development rights) = 9 development rights. OS&P in the UR district or in the RR district with urban street section with permanent dedication = (60/10) x 2.0 (200% of development rights) = 12 development rights. OS&P with permanent dedication and community well and septic = (60/10) x 3.0 (300% of development rights) = 18 development rights. Maximum density = 60/1218 = 1 in 53.33 (Ord. 212, passed 12‐21‐04, Ord. 224, passed 10‐27‐05, Ord. 262, passed 12‐19‐11, Ord 348, passed 05‐25‐17) City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-36 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 1040 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (CITY FILE 18-014) WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to update the City Code to update the development rights policy to make it easier to develop land; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards and City policies; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would be consistent with State law and the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the amendment would allow additional development opportunities in the Urban Reserve and Rural Residential zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Zoning Ordinance text amendment based upon the finding that the proposed amendments would be consistent with State law and the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schulz, Alan Schulz, Alan City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-36 Page 2 of 2 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-37 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 940 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO OPEN SPACE AND PRESERVATION PLATS (CITY FILE 18-014) WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to update the City Code to update the Open Space and Preservation plat ordinance to make it easier to develop land; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards and City policies; and WHEREAS, the amendment would require permanent preservation of high-quality natural communities, which is a priority for the City of Corcoran; and WHEREAS, the amendment would require preservation of open space, not considered high- quality, until municipal sewer and water are available to serve the site, which would preserve land for future development consistent with City policy; and WHEREAS, the revisions provide additional development options for Corcoran residents; and WHEREAS, the revisions reflect the City’s goals for balancing land owner rights and rural preservation; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Subdivision Ordinance text amendment based upon the finding that the proposed amendments would be consistent with State law and the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schulz, Alan Schulz, Alan City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-37 Page 2 of 2 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 25, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-395 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2019-393 and 2019-394 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 18-014) The text of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended to amend Title IX and X to update the open space and preservation plat ordinance and development rights policy to make it easier to develop land. A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of April 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STI E G R D WI L L O W D R I V E TR A I L H A V E N R O A D CA I N R O A D OAKDALE DR STREHLER ROAD PIO N E E R T R COUNTY ROAD 117 RO L L L I N G H I L L S R D LARKIN RD TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CI T Y O F G R E E N F I E L D CI T Y O F M A P L E G R O V E SCOTT LAKE BE C H T O L D R O A D MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUS H C R E E K 3 5 4 4 7 4 3 3 9 8 8 8 8 3 8 3 8 8 8 3 13 3 8 3 3 8 4 8 3 8 8 3 8 8 3 8 8 3 8 8 7 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 3 7 7 7 2 8 13 3 2 11 4 7 2 7 7 2 12 5 2 8 8 12 7 77 1 12 6 7 5 6 6 7 10 6 6 6 3 5 6 2 6 4 2 2 10 2 2 2 5 5 2 2 4 5 5 1 45 4 4 1 4 1 4 4 1 1 4 4 1 1 4 1 1 4 4 4 1 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 3 1 4 6 2 1 7 4 1 4 3 4 4 1 1 1 4 1 4 4 1 6 4 4 1 4 4 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 3 1 3 1 2 3 4 1 3 2 4 5 1 42 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 11 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 8 3 9 9 149 8 8 8 8 8 9 8 8 8 911 11 6 9 6 5 20 0 0 5 6 6 5 5 6 6 12 3 2 11 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 0 0 2 8 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 20 3 3 2 2 2 3 11 0 2 0 3 3 0 1 3 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 1 0 10 19 30 55 50 116 117 101 Proposed Development Rights Map* 4 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Parcels Parcels Enrolled in the Ag Preserve Program City ofCORCORAN Current as of April xx, 2019 *Existing vacant lots of record which show no building rights may have one building right remaining. Please confer with the City Planner to confirm the actual number of building rights. Black text is existing Red text is proposed $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STI E G R D WI L L O W D R I V E TR A I L H A V E N R O A D CA I N R O A D OAKDALE DR STREHLER ROAD PIO N E E R T R COUNTY ROAD 117 RO L L L I N G H I L L S R D LARKIN RD TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CI T Y O F G R E E N F I E L D CI T Y O F M A P L E G R O V E SCOTT LAKE BE C H T O L D R O A D MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUS H C R E E K 8 4 3 9 9 9 14 8 8 8 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 13 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 911 7 11 7 7 6 8 13 9 2 11 7 6 7 7 5 12 5 2 8 8 12 7 77 1 20 12 6 7 5 6 6 7 10 6 6 6 3 5 6 5 6 4 6 6 10 5 5 2 5 5 6 6 4 5 5 1 12 5 4 4 3 4 2 11 4 4 2 3 4 4 3 2 4 2 3 4 4 4 2 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 8 1 4 6 2 2 7 4 3 4 3 4 4 1 1 3 4 3 4 4 3 6 4 4 2 4 4 3 3 2 3 1 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 4 3 11 3 2 4 5 2 42 1 2 2 3 2 2 6 3 3 2 2 1 13 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 3 10 19 30 55 50 116 117 101 Proposed Development Rights Map* 4 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Parcels Parcels Enrolled in the Ag Preserve Program City ofCORCORAN Current as of April xx, 2019 *Existing vacant lots of record which show no building rights may have one building right remaining. Please confer with the City Planner to confirm the actual number of building rights. 30' VARIES 1' MINIMUM 30' 2%2.5% VARI E S NOTES: 1.TYPICAL SECTION SHOWN IS THE MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL STREET REQUIREMENT. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROJECT SPECIFIC DETAILS. 2.DRAINTILE SHALL BE INSTALLED BEHIND CURB. DRAINTILE TO BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY DRAIN ALL SELECT GRANULAR FILL AREAS. 3.STREET SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR A 30 MPH DESIGN SPEED WITH MINIMUM 0.50% AND MAXIMUM 6.00% GRADE. 4.THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INCREASE THE STREET SECTION BASED ON SOIL CONDITIONS. 5.REFER TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR TRAIL DETAILS. 6.RECYCLED MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED IN BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE. VARIES SEE STR 2 VARIES SEE STR 2 SEE STANDARD PLATE STREET 4 FOR UNDER DRAIN INSTALLATION SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER SEE PLATE STREET 5 TACK COAT PER MN/DOT 2357 1.5" SPWEA240B WEAR COURSE PER MN/DOT 2360 2" SPNWB230B BASE COURSE PER MN/DOT 2360 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE MN/DOT 3138 12" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW PER MN/DOT 3149.B2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V (NON-WOVEN) 1' MIN 5' CONC WALK (TYP) R/W 40'40' 2.5% 16' R/W 16' 4' SHLDR 4' SHLDR V A R I E S 3: 1 M A X 4:1 4" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SHLDR GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V (NON-WOVEN) 12" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW PER MN/DOT 3149.B2 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE MN/DOT 3138 2" SPNWB230B BASE COURSE PER MN/DOT 2360 TACK COAT PER MN/DOT 2357 1.5" SPWEA240B WEAR COURSE PER MN/DOT 2360 SEE STANDARD PLATE STREET 4 FOR UNDER DRAIN INSTALLATION 2' 2. 5 ' M I N VAR I E S 3:1 M A X 4:1 NOTES: 1.TYPICAL SECTION SHOWN IS THE MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL STREET REQUIREMENT. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROJECT SPECIFIC DETAILS. 2.DRAINTILE SHALL BE INSTALLED BELOW AGGREGATE SHOULDER. DRAINTILE TO BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY DRAIN ALL SELECT GRANULAR FILL AREAS. 3.STREET SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR A 30 MPH DESIGN SPEED WITH MINIMUM 2.00% AND MAXIMUM 6.00% GRADE. 4.THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INCREASE THE STREET SECTION BASED ON SOIL CONDITIONS. 5.REFER TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR TRAIL DETAILS. 6.RECYCLED MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED IN BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE. 7.DRIVEWAY CULVERT MINIMUM DIAMETER IS 12-INCH. 8' BIT. TRAIL R/W 1' MIN TRAIL EASEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED C1.1 PRE L I M I N A R Y NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N R A I N S P R O P E R T I E S INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: C h r i s R a i n s 6 1 2 - 5 9 9 - 0 3 7 2 c h r i s @ r a i n s p r o p e r t i e s . c o m 6 2 4 C E N T R A L A V E N U E O S S E O , M N 5 5 3 6 9 LEGEND: Ol d M i l l L a n e 106th Avenue// STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10a. Council Meeting: April 25, 2019 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Job Offer – Administrative Assistant Action Required: Approval Summary: On February 14th Council approved a reorganization of the Adminstrative deparment and the recruitment for the Administrative Assistant position. Applications were due on March 11th and 154 completed applications were received. The City held first round interviews on April 11th and second round interviews on April 18th which included a skills assessment. A final interview for the preferred candidate will be scheduled to take place the week of April 22nd. Following the final interview, staff plans to draft job offer to the preferred candidate for the Council to review. This will be sent to the Council in advance of the meeting. Financial/Budget: The details of the offer will include items related to salary and benefits. The 2019 budget includes the Administrative Assistant position. Options: 1. Approve a job offer with the preferred candidate as presented at the meeting. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation Staff will negotiate in good faith with the candidate in a manner that protects the finances of the City while providing adequate financial compensation for the work required of the position. Staff will recommend approval of the conditional offer as presented at the meeting. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve a job offer with the preferred candidate as presented at the meeting. Attachments: N/A STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10b. Council Meeting: April 25, 2019 Prepared By: Brad Martens, Topic: 2018 Surplus Allocation Action Required: Direction Summary: Auditors completed initial work for the 2018 audit April 10-12. The result of that review is a determination that the City has a surplus of approximately $260,000 from 2018 after allocating funds to retain the 35% reserve balance. The following is an overview of some of the reasons for the surplus: • Higher than anticipated tax collections: $20,004 • Higher than anticipated building permit revenue: $175,251 • Unanticipated special assessment revenue from past projects: $36,434 • Police fine revenue above budget: $20,807 • Police state aid above budget: $14,601 Staff is requesting the City Council direct staff on where to allocate the funds prior to the audit being completed and presented to the Council. Examples include increasing reserves beyond 35%, allocating funds to the Long Range Planning Fund, and allocating to other funds. Financial/Budget: Staff recommends at minimum maintaining the 35% reserve balance and consider allocating the additional surplus to another fund so it can be utilized in the future. Options: 1. Direct staff on how to designate surplus funds in advance of finalizing the 2018 audit. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Staff recommends allocating the surplus funds beyond maintaining the 35% reserve balance to the Long Range Planning Fund to be used for future projects. Council Action: Consider a motion to allocate surplus funds beyond maintaining the 35% reserve balance to the Long Range Planning Fund. Attachments: None Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 MEMORANDUM 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net DATE April 17, 2019 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications Projects/Comments in blue italics are new Project marked with an * have moved from active to approved The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1.Southeast District Master Plan and Design Guidelines update (city file 18-012). The draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan anticipates significant changes to the transportation network that make it necessary to update this plan, which is adopted as Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance. At the April 26th meeting, the Council authorized staff to begin this work . Staff met with Hennepin County and is now drafting road alignments for incorporation into updated plan options. This item was discussed at the November 8th Council Work Session. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 4th and recommended approval. The City Council is expected to take action on April 25th. 2.Development Rights and OS&P ordinance updates (city file 18-014). One of the implementation strategies from the Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan was to consider amendments to the OS&P ordinance to better reflect City goals. The Council is also considering changes to the development rights program. Staff presented the City Council with a work plan and schedule at the May 24th meeting. The Council discussed at the October 11th Work Session and the January 24th Work Session. The Council directed staff to schedule a public hearing. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 4th and recommended approval. The City Council is expected to take action on April 25th. 3.Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD and Rezoning for “Pheasant Ridge Second Addition”. (PID 0311923310003, 0311923430005, 0311923410002) (City File 18-029). The Council has reviewed and provided feedback to the applicant on a PUD sketch plan. This formal application for an OS&P subdivision is currently incomplete. Upon receipt of the missing items, staff will schedule this request for Council action. 4.Meyer Lot Line Adjustment at 10740 Bechtold Road (City File 18-039). The application is currently incomplete. Additional right-of-way is required for the lot line adjustment and this item will be scheduled for Council action when deemed complete. 5.Bellwether 2nd Addition Final Plat and Final PUD Development Plan (City file 19-001). The application is for PUD final plan approval for 79 lots and final plat approval of 50 lots. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 4th and recommended approval. The City Council is expected to take action on April 25th. 6.Ravinia 12th Final Plat and PUD Amendment (City file 19-002). The application for final plat would dedicate the remaining right-of-way for Gleason Parkway. The PUD Amendment is a request for a change in unit type. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 4th and recommended approval. The City Council is expected to take action on April 25th. Agenda Item 11a. MEMORANDUM 2 7. Larkin Road Final Plat (City file 19-003). This is a request for preliminary plat for a two-lot subdivision with a private drive. The item has been scheduled for Council action on April 25th. 8. Rolling Hills Acres Preliminary Plat at 6730 Rolling Hills Road (City file 19-004). This application for a four-lot subdivision is incomplete and will be scheduled for a public hearing at the Planning Commission and City Council action when deemed complete. 9. Ravinia 11th Final Plat and Final PUD Plan (city file 19-005). The request is for 14 lots on the Nichols property. The preliminary approvals were granted on February 28th. The application is tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission and Council review in May. 10. Applewood Point Sketch Plan at 19220 County Road 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (City File 19- 007). Trek Development, Inc. has submitted a sketch plan for a residential development with a multi- family building and single-family homes. The Council reviewed a different sketch plan at the May 24, 2018 meeting and indicated support. This item is scheduled for Council review on April 25th. Also, there are several projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out: 1. Corcoran Business Park (City file 06-005). The City Council granted a one-year extension to the final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and is still working to close out this project. Staff has spoken to the applicant and will schedule a meeting when more information is available on the Loretto sewer project. 2. Hope Ministries Conditional Use Permit for Cemetery and Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easement at 19951 Oswald Farm Road (City file 12-002). Hope Ministries submitted a request for a conditional use permit to allow a cemetery west of the existing church. The application was approved by the City Council on March 22nd and site work had begun. The letter of credit for site improvements has been released, but we are holding the escrow pending completion of the approved landscaping. The applicant has indicated that they are considering a site plan amendment application to modify the approved plans. Staff met again with Pastor Brian Lother in July 2017 to discuss the outstanding issues and future expansion plans on the property. 3. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning for Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14-027). The City Council approved the request on December 11, 2014 and granted the applicant 2 years to apply for the final plat and final PUD development plan. Peachtree Partners did not buy the property, but a different developer could still proceed with the approved plan. On December 9, 2016, the applicant submitted a written request to extend the approvals for an additional year. Staff recommended that this request be reviewed by the City Council, but adequate time was not provided to place this on a Council agenda prior to expiration. Staff administratively approved an extension until February 28, 2017 so that this request for extension could be considered at the February 23, 2017 Council meeting. At that meeting, the City Council approved a one year extension. The City Council approved another one year extension at the January 25, 2018 meeting. The applicant was granted another extension at the February 28, 2019 Council meeting. 4. Commercial Door Addition at 7670 Commerce Street (City file 15-010) The City received an application for approval of a building addition, which required a conditional use permit, interim use permit, variance and site plan approval. The project was reviewed at a public hearing at the June 4th Planning Commission meeting and was approved by the City Council on June 25th. The required landscaping will be finalized and constructed after the downtown infrastructure project is completed. The City will release the remaining escrow when the planting is completed. 5. 2040 Corcoran Comprehensive Plan (City file 17-001). This year-long process was kicked off with a joint City Council/Commission work session on March 16th followed by three community open houses/events and several commission meetings and Council work sessions. The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed at their March 20th meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 5th and on April 26th the City Council approved the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for distribution to adjacent jurisdictions for comment. The adjacent jurisdictions have six months to review and comment and then Corcoran will send to the Metropolitan Council to review for compliance with regional MEMORANDUM 3 systems. The final draft was approved at the March 14th meeting and submitted to the Metropolitan Council. 6. Natural Resource Protection Ordinance (city file 18-010). The Council directed staff to look at options to preserve trees and natural resources to maintain the rural character of the community in both rural and urban areas. Staff presented for Council review at the May 24th meeting and the Council tabled this item. 7. Sketch Plan for “Edgewater of Corcoran” at 19220 County Road 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003 and 25-119-23-14-0002) (City file 18-018). Trek Development, Inc. has submitted a sketch plan for a residential development with a senior living continuum of care complex, apartment and single family homes. The Council reviewed the sketch plan at the May 24th meeting and indicated support. 8. Final Plat for “Rush Creek Run” at 7320 Rolling Hills Road (PID 28-119-23-22-0003) (city file 18- 026). A request for final plat approval was been submitted. The preliminary plat for this project was approved on April 26th. This final plat was approved at the October 25th Council meeting. 9. Peter and Jean Dahlheimer request for Topography Exemption and Wetland Delineation Exemption at 20702 County Road 50 (PID 22-119-23-41-0001) (City File No. 18-036). The application was reviewed and approved by the City Council action on November 8th. 10. Kariniemi Preliminary Plat for two lots at 20801 Larkin Road. (PID 2711923410009) (City File 18- 037). There was an error in the public hearing notice, so the Planning Commission opened the public hearing at the January 3rd Planning Commission meeting and continued it to February 7th. City Council approved the request on February 14th. 11. Corcoran Land Holdings L.L.C. Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan at the SW corner of CR 19 and CR 10 (PID 18-119-23-12-0001) (City File 18-038). The request is currently incomplete, but if the missing information is received the item could be scheduled for Planning Commission and Council review in February. The item was withdrawn. 12. Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD for U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) for “Ravinia 11th Addition” (PID 36-119-23-44-0012) (City File 18-040). Lennar has filed a plat for 15 lots at 6351 CR 101 (the Nichols property) and is proposing to the property to Ravinia. The landowner submitted a sketch plan for Council review in 2017. A public hearing was held on February 7th and the City Council approved on February 28th. 13. Preliminary plat, final plat, and variances for “Dahlheimer Farms” on property located at 20702 County Road 50 (PID 22-119-23-41-0001) (City File 18-041). The Council approved a wetland waiver for a portion of this property in 2018. The applicants are proposing to subdivide the existing farm to create a 5-acre lot for the farmstead and the fields will be platted as an outlot. A public hearing was held on February 7th and the City Council approved on February 28th. CI T Y O F C O R C O R A N 2 0 1 9 P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T - G E N E R A L F U N D MA R C H 3 1 , 2 0 1 9 UN A U D I T E D 11b. 20 1 9 Z a r i a n c e Ac c o u n t D e s c r i p t i o n 2 0 1 8 A c t u a l 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t 2 0 1 9 A c t u a l A m o u n t R e m a i n i n g % R e m a i n i n g Ye a r E n d F o r e c a s t Bu d g e t v s Y E F COMMENTS RE V E N U E Ot h e r G e n e r a l G o v e r n m e n t R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 1 0 2 0 D e l i n q u e n t P r o p e r t y T a x e s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 1 0 2 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 1 0 4 0 F i s c a l D i s p a r i t i e s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 1 0 4 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 1 0 5 0 T a x I n c r e m e n t s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 1 0 5 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 1 1 0 0 G e n e r a l P r o p e r t y T a x e s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 1 1 0 0 3 , 4 8 3 , 2 3 8 . 4 6 3 , 6 9 0 , 6 2 9 . 0 0 1 9 , 3 7 7 . 6 8 3 , 6 7 1 , 2 5 1 . 3 2 9 9 . 4 7 % 3 , 6 9 0 , 6 2 9 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 J a n u a r y T a x e s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 1 8 1 0 C a b l e F r a n c h i s e F e e R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 1 8 1 0 4 9 , 0 2 9 . 5 7 5 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 5 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 2 1 1 0 L i q u o r L i c e n s e F e e R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 2 1 1 0 1 8 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 1 8 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 - 1 8 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 8 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 4 0 2 H o m e s t e a d C r e d i t R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 4 0 2 2 0 , 0 3 7 . 3 0 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 4 0 3 M o b i l e H o m e H o m e s t e a d C r e d i t R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 4 0 3 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 0 A g P r e s e r v e C r e d i t R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 0 1 1 , 5 9 8 . 7 7 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 ( 1 1 , 5 9 8 . 7 7 ) 2 3 , 5 9 8 . 7 7 1 9 6 . 6 6 % 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R e c e i v e d i n 2 0 1 9 f o r 2 0 1 8 . R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 1 P E R A S t a t e A i d R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 1 1 , 8 4 5 . 0 0 1 , 8 4 5 . 0 0 - 1 , 8 4 5 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 2 O t h e r S t a t e G r a n t s a n d A i d s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 2 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 6 2 0 O t h e r C o u n t y G r a n t s / A i d R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 3 6 2 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 0 0 0 C h a r g e s f o r S e r v i c e s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 0 0 0 7 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 1 0 3 Z o n i n g / L a n d U s e A p p l F e e R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 1 0 3 5 5 , 6 3 8 . 0 8 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 2 3 5 . 0 0 2 9 , 7 6 5 . 0 0 8 5 . 0 4 % 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 1 0 5 C o p i e s / M a p s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 1 0 5 6 1 . 5 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 - 1 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 1 0 7 S p e c i a l A s s e s s m e n t S e a r c h R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 1 0 7 2 5 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 - 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 1 0 8 T I F A d m i n i s t r a t i o n R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 1 0 8 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 1 1 0 E s c r o w A d m i n i s t r a t i v e R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 1 1 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 4 0 0 R e c y c l i n g R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 4 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 4 0 5 C l e a n U p D a y I n c o m e R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 4 4 0 5 3 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 1 0 0 S p e c i a l A s s e s s m e n t s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 1 0 0 3 6 , 4 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 0 0 M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 0 0 6 , 1 9 6 . 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 - 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 1 0 I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 1 0 5 , 6 5 6 . 9 0 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 1 7 S a l e o f A s s e t s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 1 7 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 2 0 O t h e r R e n t s a n d R o y a l t i e s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 2 0 9 , 5 8 0 . 0 0 1 1 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 - 1 1 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 1 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 0 D o n a t i o n s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 0 ( 4 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 ) 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 3 R e f u n d s / R e i m b u r s e m e n t s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 3 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 3, 6 6 0 , 7 3 3 . 0 8 $ 3 , 8 4 4 , 1 6 9 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 0 1 3 . 9 1 $ 3 , 8 3 1 , 1 5 5 . 0 9 $ 3 , 8 4 4 , 1 6 9 . 0 0 $ - $ Pl a n n i n g a n d Z o n i n g R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 3 4 1 0 3 Z o n i n g / L a n d U s e A p p l F e e R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 3 4 1 0 3 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Co d e E n f o r c e m e n t R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 2 1 0 0 B u s i n e s s / L i c e n s e F e e R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 2 1 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 4 0 0 0 C h a r g e s f o r S e r v i c e s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 4 0 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Ci t y H a l l O p e r a t i o n s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 4 1 0 0 G e n e r a l G o v e r n m e n t R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 4 1 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 4 1 0 1 F a c il i t y R e n t a l R 10 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 4 1 0 1 8 , 2 5 0 . 5 0 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 4 7 5 . 0 0 6 , 0 2 5 . 0 0 9 2 . 6 9 % 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 6 2 0 0 M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s R 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 6 2 0 0 2 , 2 4 6 . 3 7 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 4 . 0 0 6 9 6 . 0 0 6 9 . 6 0 % 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 10 , 4 9 6 . 8 7 $ 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 7 9 . 0 0 $ 6 , 7 2 1 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Po l i c e R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 2 2 4 0 A n i m a l L i c e n s e s R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 2 2 4 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 3 P o l i c e A i d R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 3 6 9 , 6 0 0 . 7 7 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 4 P o l i c e P O S T B o a r d T r a i n R e i m b R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 4 1 0 , 5 2 7 . 0 4 1 0 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 - 1 0 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 3 6 2 0 O t h e r C o u n t y G r a n t s / A i d R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 3 6 2 0 1 6 , 0 2 6 . 6 3 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 P a s s t h r o u g h t o f u n d - ( 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 1 1 a n d 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 1 1 ) R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 0 P o l i c e P e r m i t s R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 0 5 , 5 2 1 . 5 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 1 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 9 9 . 5 0 % 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 1 P o l i c e S e r v i c e d C h a r g e s R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 1 6 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 - 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 P a s s t h r o u g h t o f u n d - ( 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 1 1 a n d 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 1 1 ) ( C o u n t r y D a z e ) R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 2 P o l i c e R e p o r t s / F e e s R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 2 7 8 7 . 7 5 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 2 . 0 0 9 5 8 . 0 0 9 5 . 8 0 % 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 3 S a f e & S o b e r G r a n t R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 3 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 4 T r a i n i n g R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 4 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 5 P o l i c e E v e n t O v e r T i m e R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 4 2 0 5 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 5 1 0 1 F i n e s R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 5 1 0 1 6 5 , 8 0 7 . 1 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 3 1 0 . 8 0 4 4 , 6 8 9 . 2 0 8 9 . 3 8 % 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 0 0 M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 2 8 . 7 5 - 2 2 8 . 7 5 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 2 0 O t h e r R e n t s a n d R o y a l t i e s R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 2 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 0 D o n a t i o n s R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 3 R e f u n d s / R e i m b u r s e m e n t s R 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 3 7 , 7 4 9 . 8 4 0 . 0 0 5 , 8 1 2 . 3 8 - 5 , 8 1 2 . 3 8 0 % 5 , 8 1 2 . 3 8 5 , 8 1 2 . 3 8 W C R e i b u r s e m e n t 18 2 , 8 9 5 . 6 8 $ 1 4 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 4 0 3 . 9 3 $ 1 2 9 , 3 9 6 . 0 7 $ 1 4 6 , 6 1 2 . 3 8 $ 5 , 8 1 2 . 3 8 $ Bu i l d i n g I n s p e c t i o n R 1 0 0 - 4 2 4 0 0 - 3 2 2 1 0 B l d g / P l a n R e v i e w F e e s R 1 0 0 - 4 2 4 0 0 - 3 2 2 1 0 5 3 2 , 1 1 4 . 9 7 $ 4 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 9 , 2 8 2 . 2 9 $ 3 2 5 , 7 1 7 . 7 1 7 6 . 6 4 % 4 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 % Pu b l i c W o r k s 0% 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 3 4 1 8 M u n i S t a t e A i d S t M a i n t e n a n c e R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 3 4 1 8 1 2 9 , 2 1 0 . 1 0 1 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 6 , 3 1 3 . 5 4 2 8 , 6 8 6 . 4 6 2 1 . 2 5 % 1 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 4 3 0 0 P u b l i c W o r k s P e r m i t s / F e e s R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 4 3 0 0 4 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 3 5 . 0 0 2 , 4 6 5 . 0 0 8 2 . 1 7 % 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 4 3 0 1 D u s t C o n t r o l R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 4 3 0 1 4 6 , 4 6 0 . 1 3 3 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 ( 2 0 4 . 8 8 ) 3 7 , 7 0 4 . 8 8 1 0 0 . 5 5 % 3 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R e c e i v e d i n 2 0 1 9 f o r 2 0 1 8 . R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 1 0 0 S p e c i a l A s s e s s m e n t s R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 1 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 0 0 M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 0 0 3 0 , 9 6 8 . 6 8 3 4 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 - 3 4 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 4 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 0 D o n a t i o n s R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 3 R e f u n d s / R e i m b u r s e m e n t s R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 3 2 , 9 1 8 . 7 0 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 21 3 , 9 9 7 . 6 1 $ 2 1 0 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 6 , 6 4 3 . 6 6 $ 1 0 3 , 4 5 6 . 3 4 $ 2 1 0 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Ic e & S n o w R e m o v a l R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 2 5 - 3 6 2 0 0 I c e & S n o w R e m o v a l / M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v R 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 2 5 - 3 6 2 0 0 1 9 , 8 8 4 . 5 7 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 % Re c y c l i n g R 1 0 0 - 4 3 2 3 2 - 3 3 6 1 0 C o u n t y R e c y c l i n g G r a n t R 1 0 0 - 4 3 2 3 2 - 3 3 6 1 0 1 5 , 7 4 4 . 0 0 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 3 2 3 2 - 3 4 4 0 0 R e c y c l i n g R 1 0 0 - 4 3 2 3 2 - 3 4 4 0 0 3 , 5 6 5 . 3 4 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 ( 1 3 0 . 9 3 ) 2 , 6 3 0 . 9 3 1 0 5 . 2 4 % 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R e c e i v e d i n 2 0 1 9 f o r 2 0 1 8 . R 1 0 0 - 4 3 2 3 2 - 3 6 2 0 0 M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s R 1 0 0 - 4 3 2 3 2 - 3 6 2 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 19 , 3 0 9 . 3 4 $ 1 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ ( 1 3 0 . 9 3 ) $ 1 8 , 6 3 0 . 9 3 $ 1 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Pa r k s R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 2 O t h e r S t a t e G r a n t s a n d A i d s R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 3 4 2 2 5 5 , 1 0 4 . 1 2 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 o f 5 CI T Y O F C O R C O R A N 2 0 1 9 P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T - G E N E R A L F U N D MA R C H 3 1 , 2 0 1 9 UN A U D I T E D 11b. Ac c o u n t D e s c r i p t i o n 2 0 1 8 A c t u a l 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t 2 0 1 9 A c t u a l A m o u n t R e m a i n i n g % R e m a i n i n g Ye a r E n d F o r e c a s t Bu d g e t v s Y E F COMMENTS R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 4 1 0 1 F a c il i t y R e n t a l R 10 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 4 1 0 1 8 9 9 . 8 2 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 6 1 9 9 R e c r e a t i o n P r o g r a m m i n g R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 6 1 9 9 2 , 2 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 , 8 1 7 . 5 0 - 1 7 , 8 1 7 . 5 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 6 2 0 0 M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 6 2 0 0 3 6 5 . 0 0 5 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 7 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 9 9 . 9 1 % 5 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R e c r e a t i o n a l P r o g r a m m i n g w a s m o v e d t o a n e w l i n e i t e m R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 0 D o n a t i o n s R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 0 1 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 3 R e f u n d s / R e i m b u r s e m e n t s R 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 6 2 3 3 - 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 69 , 3 8 8 . 9 4 $ 9 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 8 6 7 . 5 0 $ 7 8 , 1 3 2 . 5 0 $ 9 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Tr a n s f e r s t o / f r o m O t h e r F u n d s R 1 0 0 - 4 9 3 6 0 - 3 9 2 0 0 T r a n s f e r f r o m O t h e r F u n d R 1 0 0 - 4 9 3 6 0 - 3 9 2 0 0 1 9 2 , 8 7 1 . 0 0 $ 2 0 5 , 8 3 0 . 0 0 - 2 0 5 , 8 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 0 5 , 8 3 0 . 0 0 $ - $ To t a l R e v e n u e 4, 9 0 1 , 6 9 2 $ 4 , 9 5 3 , 8 9 9 $ 2 4 8 , 8 5 9 $ 4 , 7 0 5 , 0 4 0 $ 4 , 9 5 9 , 7 1 1 $ 5 , 8 1 2 $ EX P E N S E Ci t y C h a r t e r E 1 0 0 - 4 1 0 0 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 0 0 0 - 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 0 0 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 0 0 0 - 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Ci t y C o u n c i l E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 W a g e s a n d S a l a r i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 1 9 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 1 9 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 9 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 1 2 2 F I C A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 1 2 2 1 , 1 9 4 . 1 2 1 , 1 9 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 9 5 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 1 9 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 1 2 6 M e d i c a r e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 1 2 6 2 7 9 . 3 2 2 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 8 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 2 0 8 T r a i n i n g a n d I n s t r u c t i o n E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 2 0 8 0 . 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 7 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 2 1 0 7 5 5 . 3 6 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 1 . 5 8 1 , 3 4 8 . 4 2 8 9 . 8 9 % 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 3 6 4 W o r k e r ' s C o m p I n s u r a n c e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 0 0 - 3 6 4 6 7 . 0 0 7 3 . 5 0 6 1 . 0 0 1 2 . 5 0 1 7 . 0 1 % 7 3 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 21 , 5 5 5 . 8 0 $ 2 3 , 8 0 8 . 5 0 $ 6 6 2 . 5 8 $ 2 3 , 1 4 5 . 9 2 $ 2 3 , 8 0 8 . 5 0 $ - $ Wa s t e w a t e r C o m m i t t e e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 2 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 2 0 - 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 Ne w s p a p e r / N e w s l e t t e r / W e b s i t e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 3 0 - 3 5 1 N e w s l e t t e r E x p e n s e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 3 0 - 3 5 1 7 , 6 4 3 . 5 4 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 2 0 8 . 9 8 6 , 2 9 1 . 0 2 7 4 . 0 1 % 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 3 0 - 3 5 2 G e n e r a l N o t i c e s a n d P u b I n f o E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 3 0 - 3 5 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 3 0 - 3 5 4 W e b S i t e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 1 3 0 - 3 5 4 8 5 0 . 0 0 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 8, 4 9 3 . 5 4 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 0 8 . 9 8 $ 1 1 , 7 9 1 . 0 2 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Ci t y A d m i n i s t r a t o r E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 0 0 W a g e s a n d S a l a r i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 0 0 1 1 0 , 4 1 3 . 4 4 1 1 2 , 1 9 5 . 0 0 2 8 , 3 6 5 . 6 5 8 3 , 8 2 9 . 3 5 7 4 . 7 2 % 1 1 2 , 1 9 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 1 0 O v e r t i m e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 2 1 P E R A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 2 1 8 , 2 8 1 . 0 1 8 , 4 1 5 . 0 0 2 , 1 2 7 . 4 4 6 , 2 8 7 . 5 6 7 4 . 7 2 % 8 , 4 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 2 2 F I C A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 2 2 6 , 8 2 4 . 7 3 6 , 9 5 6 . 0 0 1 , 7 3 5 . 3 0 5 , 2 2 0 . 7 0 7 5 . 0 5 % 6 , 9 5 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 2 6 M e d i c a r e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 2 6 1 , 5 9 6 . 0 6 1 , 6 2 7 . 0 0 4 0 5 . 8 5 1 , 2 2 1 . 1 5 7 5 . 0 6 % 1 , 6 2 7 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 3 0 E m p l o y e r P a i d F S A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 3 1 E m p l o y e r P a i d H e a l t h E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 3 1 1 4 , 7 2 8 . 9 7 1 6 , 7 2 1 . 0 0 4 , 5 0 7 . 0 2 1 2 , 2 1 3 . 9 8 7 3 . 0 5 % 1 6 , 7 2 1 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 3 2 M e d i c a l C a f e t e r i a P l a n E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 3 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 3 3 E m p l o y e r P a i d H S A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 3 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 4 0 U n e m p l o y m e n t C o m p ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 1 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 2 0 8 T r a i n i n g a n d I n s t r u c t i o n E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 2 0 8 4 , 4 2 9 . 7 7 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 4 6 . 0 0 % 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 2 1 0 1 , 2 5 2 . 5 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 6 . 1 2 8 6 3 . 8 8 8 6 . 3 9 % 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 3 6 4 W o r k e r ' s C o m p I n s u r a n c e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 3 6 4 7 9 5 . 0 0 5 3 5 . 5 0 6 5 6 . 0 0 - 1 2 0 . 5 0 - 2 2 . 5 0 % 5 3 5 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 4 3 3 D u e s a n d M e m b e r s h i p s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 3 0 0 - 4 3 3 9 9 8 . 2 5 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 9 2 4 . 9 2 3 7 5 . 0 8 2 8 . 8 5 % 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 14 9 , 3 1 9 . 7 6 $ 1 5 3 , 7 4 9 . 5 0 $ 4 1 , 5 5 8 . 3 0 $ 1 1 2 , 1 9 1 . 2 0 $ 1 5 3 , 7 4 9 . 5 0 $ - $ Cl e r k / A d m i n E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 0 0 W a g e s a n d S a l a r i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 0 0 1 8 4 , 9 1 3 . 2 6 2 2 1 , 6 8 9 . 0 0 4 2 , 8 2 8 . 0 0 1 7 8 , 8 6 1 . 0 0 8 0 . 6 8 % 2 2 1 , 6 8 9 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 1 0 O v e r t i m e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 1 0 5 9 2 . 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 2 1 P E R A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 2 1 1 2 , 7 8 6 . 1 0 1 6 , 6 2 7 . 0 0 3 , 2 1 2 . 1 0 1 3 , 4 1 4 . 9 0 8 0 . 6 8 % 1 6 , 6 2 7 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 2 2 F I C A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 2 2 1 1 , 0 3 8 . 7 4 1 3 , 7 4 5 . 0 0 2 , 6 6 8 . 4 0 1 1 , 0 7 6 . 6 0 8 0 . 5 9 % 1 3 , 7 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 2 6 M e d i c a r e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 2 6 2 , 5 8 1 . 6 0 3 , 2 1 4 . 0 0 6 2 4 . 0 7 2 , 5 8 9 . 9 3 8 0 . 5 8 % 3 , 2 1 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 3 0 E m p l o y e r P a i d F S A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 3 1 E m p l o y e r P a i d H e a l t h E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 3 1 5 6 , 5 5 4 . 9 9 5 3 , 1 9 6 . 0 0 1 4 , 7 2 8 . 4 8 3 8 , 4 6 7 . 5 2 7 2 . 3 1 % 5 3 , 1 9 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 3 2 M e d i c a l C a f e t e r i a P l a n E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 3 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 3 3 E m p l o y e r P a i d H S A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 3 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 4 0 U n e m p l o y m e n t C o m p ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 1 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 2 0 8 T r a i n i n g a n d I n s t r u c t i o n E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 2 0 8 1 , 4 8 6 . 8 4 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 6 3 9 . 7 7 4 , 8 6 0 . 2 3 8 8 . 3 7 % 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 2 1 0 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 4 1 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 3 0 4 . 4 6 1 , 4 4 5 . 5 4 8 2 . 6 0 % 1 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 3 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 3 6 4 W o r k e r ' s C o m p I n s u r a n c e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 3 6 4 2 , 1 3 8 . 0 0 1 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 1 , 7 6 4 . 0 0 - 8 4 . 0 0 - 5 . 0 0 % 1 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 4 3 3 D u e s a n d M e m b e r s h i p s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 0 0 - 4 3 3 1 , 2 5 1 . 5 0 1 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 3 6 0 . 0 0 6 9 0 . 0 0 6 5 . 7 1 % 1 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 27 5 , 0 2 8 . 1 0 $ 3 1 8 , 4 5 1 . 0 0 $ 6 7 , 1 2 9 . 2 8 $ 2 5 1 , 3 2 1 . 7 2 $ 3 1 8 , 4 5 1 . 0 0 $ - $ El e c t i o n s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 1 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 4 1 0 - 2 1 0 9 , 0 9 2 . 2 9 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 2 8 . 8 0 4 7 1 . 2 0 2 7 . 7 2 % 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 Au d i t o r / T r e a s u r e r E 1 0 0 - 4 1 5 4 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 5 4 0 - 3 0 0 2 5 , 0 5 5 . 0 0 3 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 3 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 7 3 . 9 1 % 3 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 As s e s s o r E 1 0 0 - 4 1 5 5 0 - 2 0 1 P o s t a g e / S h i p p i n g ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 5 5 0 - 2 0 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 5 5 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 5 5 0 - 2 1 0 9 1 6 . 2 9 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 . 2 5 9 9 0 . 7 5 9 9 . 0 8 % 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 5 5 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 5 5 0 - 3 0 0 6 0 , 7 9 9 . 0 8 6 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 , 2 0 1 . 4 1 5 0 , 2 9 8 . 5 9 7 6 . 7 9 % 6 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 61 , 7 1 5 . 3 7 $ 6 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 2 1 0 . 6 6 $ 5 1 , 2 8 9 . 3 4 $ 6 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ At t o r n e y E 1 0 0 - 4 1 6 0 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 6 0 0 - 3 0 0 3 2 , 0 6 3 . 4 2 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 5 1 7 . 1 9 2 2 , 4 8 2 . 8 1 7 2 . 5 3 % 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 6 0 0 - 3 0 4 L e g a l F e e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 6 0 0 - 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 32 , 0 6 3 . 4 2 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 5 1 7 . 1 9 $ 2 2 , 4 8 2 . 8 1 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Ot h e r G e n e r a l G o v e r n m e n t E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 1 3 1 E m p l o y e r P a i d H e a l t h E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 1 3 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 1 5 0 W o r k e r ' s C o m p ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 1 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 2 0 1 P o s t a g e / S h i p p i n g E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 2 0 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 o f 5 CI T Y O F C O R C O R A N 2 0 1 9 P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T - G E N E R A L F U N D MA R C H 3 1 , 2 0 1 9 UN A U D I T E D 11b. Ac c o u n t D e s c r i p t i o n 2 0 1 8 A c t u a l 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t 2 0 1 9 A c t u a l A m o u n t R e m a i n i n g % R e m a i n i n g Ye a r E n d F o r e c a s t Bu d g e t v s Y E F COMMENTS E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 2 0 8 T r a i n i n g a n d I n s t r u c t i o n E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 2 0 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 2 1 0 1 0 , 4 5 7 . 6 3 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 6 8 2 . 9 5 3 , 3 1 7 . 0 5 5 5 . 2 8 % 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 W e t l a n d B u f f e r S i gns (Developer Pass Thru) and Hennepin County Taxes E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 0 0 1 4 , 1 8 5 . 6 5 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 4 . 8 1 1 1 , 3 4 5 . 1 9 9 4 . 5 4 % 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 2 1 T e l e p h o n e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 2 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 0 I n s u r a n c e ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 3 6 0 6 7 , 6 1 8 . 0 0 6 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 4 . 0 0 6 7 , 3 9 6 . 0 0 9 9 . 1 1 % 6 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 4 3 0 M i s c . B a n k i n g C h a r g e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 4 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 4 3 3 D u e s a n d M e m b e r s h i p s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 4 3 3 2 4 , 0 7 7 . 9 8 2 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 , 3 6 2 . 1 0 7 , 6 3 7 . 9 0 2 8 . 2 9 % 2 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E C W , M e t r o C i t i e s , N W H H S C,Community Media,LMC,I94 Chamber, Home Free E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 5 3 0 I m p r o v e m e n t s O t h e r T h a n B l d g E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 5 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 7 0 0 T r a n s f e r s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 7 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 8 1 0 R e f u n d s / R e i m b u r s e m e n t s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 0 0 - 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 21 6 , 3 3 9 . 2 6 $ 3 7 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 3 , 3 0 3 . 8 6 $ 3 4 9 , 6 9 6 . 1 4 $ 3 7 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Pl a n n i n g & Z o n i n g E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 0 0 W a g e s a n d S a l a r i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 2 1 P E R A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 2 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 2 2 F I C A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 2 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 2 6 M e d i c a r e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 2 6 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 3 0 E m p l o y e r P a i d F S A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 3 1 E m p l o y e r P a i d H e a l t h E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 1 3 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 2 1 0 2 9 5 . 5 7 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 3 5 . 6 2 2 , 2 1 4 . 3 8 9 8 . 4 2 % 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 3 0 0 7 6 , 3 1 0 . 7 2 6 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 , 8 7 7 . 2 5 4 7 , 1 2 2 . 7 5 7 4 . 8 0 % 6 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 3 4 4 P u b l i c H e a r i n g N o t i c e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 0 - 3 4 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 76 , 6 0 6 . 2 9 $ 6 5 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 9 1 2 . 8 7 $ 4 9 , 3 3 7 . 1 3 $ 6 5 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ - $ E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 1 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 1 1 - 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Co d e E n f o r c e m e n t E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 0 0 W a g e s a n d S a l a r i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 0 0 6 7 , 2 1 2 . 8 1 6 8 , 2 8 6 . 0 0 1 5 , 4 9 5 . 7 9 5 2 , 7 9 0 . 2 1 7 7 . 3 1 % 6 8 , 2 8 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 1 0 O v e r t i m e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 1 0 8 0 . 6 4 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 2 1 P E R A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 2 1 5 , 0 4 7 . 0 0 5 , 1 9 6 . 0 0 1 , 1 6 2 . 1 9 4 , 0 3 3 . 8 1 7 7 . 6 3 % 5 , 1 9 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 2 2 F I C A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 2 2 4 , 5 2 3 . 9 6 4 , 2 9 6 . 0 0 1 , 0 4 1 . 2 2 3 , 2 5 4 . 7 8 7 5 . 7 6 % 4 , 2 9 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 2 6 M e d i c a r e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 2 6 1 , 0 5 7 . 9 7 1 , 0 0 5 . 0 0 2 4 3 . 5 2 7 6 1 . 4 8 7 5 . 7 7 % 1 , 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 3 0 E m p l o y e r P a i d F S A E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 3 1 E m p l o y e r P a i d H e a l t h E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 3 1 8 , 3 1 4 . 0 5 7 , 7 5 4 . 0 0 2 , 2 0 5 . 4 8 5 , 5 4 8 . 5 2 7 1 . 5 6 % 7 , 7 5 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 3 2 M e d i c a l C a f e t e r i a P l a n E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 1 3 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 2 0 8 T r a i n i n g a n d I n s t r u c t i o n E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 2 0 8 6 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 2 1 0 1 , 1 8 1 . 2 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 7 . 8 0 7 8 2 . 2 0 7 8 . 2 2 % 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 0 7 . 0 0 2 4 , 7 9 3 . 0 0 9 5 . 3 6 % 2 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 3 1 V e h i c l e E x p e n s e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 3 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 4 4 P u b l i c H e a r i n g N o t i c e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 4 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 6 4 W o r k e r ' s C o m p I n s u r a n c e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 3 6 4 5 2 9 . 0 0 5 4 6 . 0 0 4 3 6 . 0 0 1 1 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 1 5 % 5 4 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 4 1 7 U n i f o r m s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 4 1 7 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 4 3 3 D u e s a n d M e m b e r s h i p s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 2 0 - 4 3 3 9 3 . 6 5 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 88 , 6 9 0 . 3 1 $ 1 1 8 , 4 3 3 . 0 0 $ 2 2 , 0 0 9 . 0 0 $ 9 6 , 4 2 4 . 0 0 $ 1 1 8 , 4 3 3 . 0 0 $ - $ Ci t y H a l l O p e r a t i o n s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 0 0 O f f i c e S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 0 0 2 , 6 2 4 . 3 8 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 0 4 . 7 5 2 , 3 9 5 . 2 5 6 8 . 4 4 % 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 0 1 P o s t a g e / S h i p p i n g E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 0 1 3 , 3 8 9 . 4 1 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 8 . 8 5 3 , 3 7 1 . 1 5 9 6 . 3 2 % 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 0 7 C o m p u t e r S u p p l i e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 0 7 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 1 0 2 1 , 2 8 3 . 9 6 1 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 , 2 8 9 . 8 6 9 , 7 1 0 . 1 4 5 1 . 1 1 % 1 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 2 8 D u s t C o n t r o l E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 2 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 6 1 R e c r e a t i o n C o m p l e x E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 2 6 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 0 0 8 , 4 5 9 . 3 7 1 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 6 5 4 . 0 0 8 , 8 4 6 . 0 0 7 0 . 7 7 % 1 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 0 4 L e g a l F e e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 2 1 T e l e p h o n e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 2 1 2 , 1 6 1 . 9 4 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 4 3 . 8 2 1 , 9 5 6 . 1 8 7 8 . 2 5 % 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 5 2 G e n e r a l N o t i c e s a n d P u b I n f o E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 5 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 6 4 W o r k e r ' s C o m p I n s u r a n c e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 6 4 0 . 0 0 2 6 . 2 5 0 . 0 0 2 6 . 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 6 . 2 5 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 8 0 U t il i t y & S e r v i c e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 10 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 3 8 0 1 4 , 2 0 7 . 6 8 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 5 1 . 6 1 1 1 , 7 4 8 . 3 9 7 8 . 3 2 % 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 4 0 0 R e p a i r s & M a i n t C o n t ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 4 0 0 8 , 5 3 4 . 0 0 1 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 8 8 2 . 0 0 1 5 , 6 1 8 . 0 0 9 4 . 6 5 % 1 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 4 3 0 M i s c . B a n k i n g C h a r g e E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 4 3 0 2 6 0 . 0 0 3 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 8 3 . 3 3 % 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 4 3 2 C r e d i t C a r d F e e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 4 3 2 3 , 0 1 7 . 8 0 7 5 0 . 0 0 9 2 1 . 8 9 - 1 7 1 . 8 9 - 2 2 . 9 2 % 7 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 5 2 0 B u i l d i n g s a n d S t r u c t u r e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 5 2 0 4 , 4 1 0 . 3 8 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 5 3 0 I m p r o v e m e n t s O t h e r T h a n B l d g E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 5 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 6 1 0 I n t e r e s t E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 6 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 8 1 0 R e f u n d s / R e i m b u r s e m e n t s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 4 1 - 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 68 , 3 4 8 . 9 2 $ 8 1 , 5 7 6 . 2 5 $ 1 9 , 8 2 6 . 7 8 $ 6 1 , 7 4 9 . 4 7 $ 8 1 , 5 7 6 . 2 5 $ - $ IT ( I n f o T e c h n o l o g y ) E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 5 1 - 2 0 7 C o m p u t e r S u p p l i e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 5 1 - 2 0 7 3 6 , 2 4 7 . 2 6 2 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 3 , 0 6 7 . 5 1 1 , 4 3 2 . 4 9 5 . 8 5 % 2 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 5 1 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 5 1 - 2 1 0 9 , 8 5 7 . 6 6 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 4 7 0 . 2 3 7 , 5 2 9 . 7 7 7 5 . 3 0 % 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 5 1 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 5 1 - 3 0 0 3 3 , 0 4 8 . 0 0 5 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 , 2 5 5 . 5 0 3 5 , 2 4 4 . 5 0 6 7 . 1 3 % 5 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 5 1 - 5 2 0 B u i l d i n g a n d S t r u c t u r e s E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 5 1 - 5 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 5 1 - 5 3 0 I m p r o v e m e n t s O t h e r T h a n B l d g E 1 0 0 - 4 1 9 5 1 - 5 3 0 5 , 5 1 5 . 3 5 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 9 . 0 0 8 , 9 3 1 . 0 0 9 9 . 2 3 % 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 84 , 6 6 8 . 2 7 $ 9 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 2 , 8 6 2 . 2 4 $ 5 3 , 1 3 7 . 7 6 $ 9 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Po l i c e E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 W a g e s a n d S a l a r i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 6 3 7 , 9 2 1 . 6 0 7 3 6 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 1 7 1 , 9 7 7 . 3 1 5 6 4 , 9 0 2 . 6 9 7 6 . 6 6 % 7 3 6 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 1 0 O v e r t i m e E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 1 0 2 4 , 5 2 4 . 2 6 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 1 5 4 . 2 9 1 3 , 8 4 5 . 7 1 6 9 . 2 3 % 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 1 1 O v e r t i m e E v e n t s / G r a n t s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 1 1 1 5 , 3 7 2 . 5 0 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 2 1 7 . 4 8 9 , 7 8 2 . 5 2 8 1 . 5 2 % 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 P a s s t h r u r e v e n u e 1 0 0 -42100-33620, 100-42100-34201 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 2 1 P E R A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 2 1 1 1 0 , 1 1 8 . 4 8 1 2 6 , 8 3 3 . 0 0 2 3 , 8 3 7 . 9 5 1 0 2 , 9 9 5 . 0 5 8 1 . 2 1 % 1 2 6 , 8 3 3 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 2 2 F I C A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 2 2 1 4 6 . 8 5 0 . 0 0 - 2 8 1 . 5 6 2 8 1 . 5 6 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 2 6 M e d i c a r e E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 2 6 9 , 7 9 6 . 7 3 1 0 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 2 , 5 4 5 . 3 0 8 , 3 0 4 . 7 0 7 6 . 5 4 % 1 0 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 3 0 E m p l o y e r P a i d F S A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 3 1 E m p l o y e r P a i d H e a l t h E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 3 1 1 4 6 , 6 6 6 . 0 6 1 5 1 , 2 2 7 . 0 0 4 4 , 8 9 8 . 2 8 1 0 6 , 3 2 8 . 7 2 7 0 . 3 1 % 1 5 1 , 2 2 7 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 3 2 M e d i c a l C a f e t e r i a P l a n E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 3 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 3 3 E m p l o y e r P a i d H S A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 3 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 3 4 E m p l o y e r P a i d H R A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 1 3 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 0 0 O f f i c e S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 0 0 2 , 0 3 6 . 9 0 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 6 8 . 6 8 2 , 4 3 1 . 3 2 6 7 . 5 4 % 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 o f 5 CI T Y O F C O R C O R A N 2 0 1 9 P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T - G E N E R A L F U N D MA R C H 3 1 , 2 0 1 9 UN A U D I T E D 11b. Ac c o u n t D e s c r i p t i o n 2 0 1 8 A c t u a l 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t 2 0 1 9 A c t u a l A m o u n t R e m a i n i n g % R e m a i n i n g Ye a r E n d F o r e c a s t Bu d g e t v s Y E F COMMENTS E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 0 1 P o s t a g e / S h i p p i n g E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 0 1 7 5 . 2 4 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 0 8 T r a i n i n g a n d I n s t r u c t i o n E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 0 8 2 4 , 8 2 7 . 7 0 2 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 6 0 4 . 2 1 1 1 , 3 9 5 . 7 9 5 1 . 8 0 % 2 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 0 9 P o l i c e R e s e r v e s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 0 9 3 , 7 6 9 . 0 1 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 9 9 . 0 0 3 , 2 0 1 . 0 0 9 1 . 4 6 % 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 1 0 6 , 1 8 0 . 4 6 1 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 7 9 4 . 3 9 1 0 , 7 0 5 . 6 1 8 5 . 6 4 % 1 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 1 1 C o n t r a c t e d S e c u r i t y E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 1 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 1 2 M o t o r F u e l s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 1 2 2 7 , 3 2 2 . 1 0 2 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 1 2 4 . 6 5 1 6 , 8 7 5 . 3 5 7 6 . 7 1 % 2 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 1 8 I n v e s t i g a t i o n s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 1 8 2 8 4 . 3 0 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 9 9 9 6 9 . 0 1 9 6 . 9 0 % 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 2 0 R e p a i r / M a i n t S u p p l y ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 2 0 8 , 7 0 2 . 3 6 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 4 3 9 . 4 7 8 , 0 6 0 . 5 3 8 4 . 8 5 % 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 2 3 B u i l d i n g R e p a i r S u p p l i e s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 2 2 3 5 , 8 7 5 . 2 1 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 4 5 . 9 4 2 , 2 5 4 . 0 6 6 4 . 4 0 % 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 0 0 2 , 9 6 0 . 4 1 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 9 0 . 1 5 2 , 1 0 9 . 8 5 7 0 . 3 3 % 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 0 1 P r i s o n e r E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 0 1 1 1 , 5 1 5 . 5 0 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 4 3 9 . 0 0 6 , 5 6 1 . 0 0 8 2 . 0 1 % 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 0 4 L e g a l F e e s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 0 4 2 9 , 3 9 4 . 5 8 2 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 7 , 9 9 5 . 3 0 1 9 , 5 0 4 . 7 0 7 0 . 9 3 % 2 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 2 1 T e l e p h o n e E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 2 1 7 , 7 4 8 . 4 6 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 1 9 2 . 4 1 7 , 3 0 7 . 5 9 7 6 . 9 2 % 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 2 3 R a d i o U n i t s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 2 3 1 7 , 0 7 3 . 4 7 1 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 2 6 6 . 7 2 1 4 , 2 3 3 . 2 8 8 1 . 3 3 % 1 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 6 4 W o r k e r ' s C o m p I n s u r a n c e E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 6 4 3 2 , 1 2 9 . 0 0 3 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 , 1 1 9 . 0 0 - 8 , 1 1 9 . 0 0 - 2 5 . 3 7 % 3 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 8 0 U t il i t y & S e r v i c e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 10 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 3 8 0 9 , 1 7 5 . 0 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 5 2 8 . 3 8 2 , 4 7 1 . 6 2 3 0 . 9 0 % 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 4 1 7 U n i f o r m s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 4 1 7 1 5 , 6 9 0 . 9 5 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 1 4 6 . 7 4 1 0 , 8 5 3 . 2 6 9 0 . 4 4 % 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 4 3 3 D u e s a n d M e m b e r s h i p s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 4 3 3 1 , 7 4 3 . 2 4 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 3 5 . 0 0 5 6 5 . 0 0 3 1 . 3 9 % 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 4 9 0 D o n a t i o n s ( G a m b l i n g P r o c e e d s ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 4 9 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 5 5 0 M o t o r V e h i c l e s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 5 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 8 1 0 R e f u n d s / R e i m b u r s e m e n t s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 0 - 8 1 0 - 6 6 2 . 5 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1, 1 5 0 , 3 8 7 . 8 3 $ 1 , 2 5 4 , 9 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 6 , 8 6 9 . 0 8 $ 9 1 8 , 0 7 0 . 9 2 $ 1 , 2 5 4 , 9 4 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Pa r t T i m e O f f i c e r s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 0 0 W a g e s a n d S a l a r i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 0 0 6 0 , 6 2 8 . 2 3 4 1 , 9 6 9 . 0 0 2 0 , 2 9 5 . 2 2 2 1 , 6 7 3 . 7 8 5 1 . 6 4 % 4 1 , 9 6 9 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 1 0 O v e r t i m e E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 1 0 2 8 6 . 5 6 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 1 1 O v e r t i m e E v e n t s / G r a n t s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 1 1 5 , 3 3 5 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 2 0 E m p l o y e r C o n t r i b R e t ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 2 1 P E R A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 2 1 4 , 5 3 1 . 9 2 4 , 9 7 9 . 0 0 1 , 6 1 2 . 7 5 3 , 3 6 6 . 2 5 6 7 . 6 1 % 4 , 9 7 9 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 2 2 F I C A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 2 2 3 , 2 8 1 . 6 6 2 , 1 6 9 . 0 4 6 6 8 . 3 8 1 , 5 0 0 . 6 6 6 9 . 1 9 % 2 , 1 6 9 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 2 6 M e d i c a r e E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 2 6 9 6 7 . 0 4 1 , 0 1 5 . 0 0 2 9 4 . 2 9 7 2 0 . 7 1 7 1 . 0 1 % 1 , 0 1 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 3 0 E m p l o y e r P a i d F S A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 3 1 E m p l o y e r P a i d H e a l t h E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 3 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 3 2 M e d i c a l C a f e t e r i a P l a n E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 3 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 3 3 E m p l o y e r P a i d H S A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 3 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 4 0 U n e m p l o y m e n t C o m p ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 5 0 W o r k e r ' s C o m p ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 6 0 L i a b il i t y I n s u r a n c e E m p l o y e e s E 10 0 - 4 2 1 0 1 - 1 6 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 75 , 0 3 0 . 4 1 $ 5 5 , 1 3 2 . 0 4 $ 2 2 , 8 7 0 . 6 4 $ 3 2 , 2 6 1 . 4 0 $ 5 5 , 1 3 2 . 0 4 $ - $ Po l i c e A d m i n E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 0 0 W a g e s a n d S a l a r i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 0 0 7 0 , 2 9 4 . 5 8 7 9 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 1 8 , 3 1 1 . 9 5 6 0 , 7 2 8 . 0 5 7 6 . 8 3 % 7 9 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 1 0 O v e r t i m e E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 1 0 3 0 . 3 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 8 3 . 1 0 4 1 6 . 9 0 8 3 . 3 8 % 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 2 0 E m p l o y e r C o n t r i b R e t ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 2 1 P E R A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 2 1 4 , 2 5 3 . 2 6 5 , 9 6 6 . 0 0 9 8 6 . 8 1 4 , 9 7 9 . 1 9 8 3 . 4 6 % 5 , 9 6 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 2 2 F I C A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 2 2 4 , 6 4 0 . 1 8 4 , 9 3 1 . 0 0 1 , 1 9 6 . 5 0 3 , 7 3 4 . 5 0 7 5 . 7 4 % 4 , 9 3 1 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 2 6 M e d i c a r e E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 2 6 1 , 0 8 5 . 2 1 1 , 1 5 3 . 0 0 2 7 9 . 8 3 8 7 3 . 1 7 7 5 . 7 3 % 1 , 1 5 3 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 3 0 E m p l o y e r P a i d F S A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 3 1 E m p l o y e r P a i d H e a l t h E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 3 1 1 6 , 9 4 3 . 2 7 1 6 , 7 2 1 . 0 0 5 , 2 8 9 . 2 3 1 1 , 4 3 1 . 7 7 6 8 . 3 7 % 1 6 , 7 2 1 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 3 2 M e d i c a l C a f e t e r i a P l a n E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 3 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 3 3 E m p l o y e r P a i d H S A E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 3 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 4 0 U n e m p l o y m e n t C o m p ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 5 0 W o r k e r ' s C o m p ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 6 0 L i a b il i t y I n s u r a n c e E m p l o y e e s E 10 0 - 4 2 1 0 2 - 1 6 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 97 , 2 4 6 . 8 0 $ 1 0 8 , 3 1 1 . 0 0 $ 2 6 , 1 4 7 . 4 2 $ 8 2 , 1 6 3 . 5 8 $ 1 0 8 , 3 1 1 . 0 0 $ - $ Fi r e E 1 0 0 - 4 2 2 0 0 - 5 5 0 M o t o r V e h i c l e s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 2 0 0 - 5 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 2 0 0 - 5 8 0 O t h e r E q u i p m e n t E 1 0 0 - 4 2 2 0 0 - 5 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 2 0 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 2 0 0 - 3 0 0 3 3 0 , 2 1 2 . 0 0 3 4 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 8 , 8 4 7 . 7 5 2 1 9 , 6 5 2 . 2 5 6 3 . 0 3 % 3 4 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 33 0 , 2 1 2 . 0 0 $ 3 4 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 8 , 8 4 7 . 7 5 $ 2 1 9 , 6 5 2 . 2 5 $ 3 4 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Bu i l d i n g I n s p e c t i o n E 1 0 0 - 4 2 4 0 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 2 4 0 0 - 3 0 0 1 4 5 , 3 9 2 . 5 2 1 5 7 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 4 2 , 7 5 6 . 4 1 1 1 4 , 4 9 3 . 5 9 7 2 . 8 1 % 1 5 7 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 2 4 0 0 - 4 3 7 S u r c h a r g e s E 1 0 0 - 4 2 4 0 0 - 4 3 7 1 6 , 4 7 1 . 1 7 1 2 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 2 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 16 1 , 8 6 3 . 6 9 $ 1 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 2 , 7 5 6 . 4 1 $ 1 2 7 , 2 4 3 . 5 9 $ 1 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Pu b l i c W o r k s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 W a g e s a n d S a l a r i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 0 0 4 5 6 , 2 5 8 . 1 9 4 8 2 , 9 7 3 . 0 0 9 6 , 6 2 8 . 9 5 3 8 6 , 3 4 4 . 0 5 7 9 . 9 9 % 4 8 2 , 9 7 3 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 1 0 O v e r t i m e E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 1 0 4 1 , 8 2 3 . 3 9 2 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 4 , 9 6 9 . 1 6 3 , 0 3 0 . 8 4 1 0 . 8 2 % 2 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 2 1 P E R A E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 2 1 3 5 , 8 6 3 . 8 5 3 8 , 3 2 3 . 0 0 9 , 1 1 9 . 8 5 2 9 , 2 0 3 . 1 5 7 6 . 2 0 % 3 8 , 3 2 3 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 2 2 F I C A E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 2 2 2 8 , 8 1 0 . 0 0 3 1 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 7 , 1 1 1 . 5 7 2 4 , 5 6 8 . 4 3 7 7 . 5 5 % 3 1 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 2 6 M e d i c a r e E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 2 6 6 , 7 3 7 . 8 2 7 , 4 0 9 . 0 0 1 , 6 6 3 . 1 8 5 , 7 4 5 . 8 2 7 7 . 5 5 % 7 , 4 0 9 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 3 0 E m p l o y e r P a i d F S A E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 3 1 E m p l o y e r P a i d H e a l t h E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 3 1 9 9 , 4 9 8 . 0 6 1 1 7 , 7 8 5 . 0 0 2 9 , 8 2 4 . 5 9 8 7 , 9 6 0 . 4 1 7 4 . 6 8 % 1 1 7 , 7 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 3 2 M e d i c a l C a f e t e r i a P l a n E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 3 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 3 3 E m p l o y e r P a i d H S A E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 3 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 3 4 E m p l o y e r P a i d H R A E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 3 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 4 0 U n e m p l o y m e n t C o m p ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 1 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 0 0 O f f i c e S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 0 8 T r a i n i n g a n d I n s t r u c t i o n E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 0 8 3 , 4 2 8 . 8 5 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 6 3 . 0 0 3 , 9 3 7 . 0 0 6 5 . 6 2 % 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 1 0 2 7 , 0 5 9 . 8 7 2 8 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 6 5 8 . 0 5 2 3 , 4 4 1 . 9 5 8 3 . 4 2 % 2 8 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 1 2 M o t o r F u e l s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 1 2 3 8 , 0 5 7 . 5 2 2 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 , 6 1 0 . 1 4 1 5 , 3 8 9 . 8 6 5 4 . 9 6 % 2 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 0 R e p a i r / M a i n t S u p p l y ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 0 5 0 , 7 3 7 . 3 0 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 9 6 4 . 4 6 2 5 , 0 3 5 . 5 4 8 0 . 7 6 % 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 2 S e a l C o a t i n g E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 2 4 9 , 7 4 9 . 9 5 6 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 3 B u i l d i n g R e p a i r S u p p l i e s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 3 1 8 , 9 4 9 . 3 2 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 0 4 0 . 2 1 7 , 9 5 9 . 7 9 7 9 . 6 0 % 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 5 L a n d s c a p e / D i t c h M a t e r i a l s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 5 6 , 5 4 2 . 5 3 1 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 5 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 4 5 . 9 2 % 1 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 6 S i g n R e p a i r M a t e r i a l s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 6 5 , 3 7 5 . 7 5 6 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 7 C r a c k F il l i n g E 10 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 7 1 6 , 0 4 7 . 5 5 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 o f 5 CI T Y O F C O R C O R A N 2 0 1 9 P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T - G E N E R A L F U N D MA R C H 3 1 , 2 0 1 9 UN A U D I T E D 11b. Ac c o u n t D e s c r i p t i o n 2 0 1 8 A c t u a l 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t 2 0 1 9 A c t u a l A m o u n t R e m a i n i n g % R e m a i n i n g Ye a r E n d F o r e c a s t Bu d g e t v s Y E F COMMENTS E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 8 D u s t C o n t r o l E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 8 8 8 , 2 6 8 . 2 6 9 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 9 C u l v e r t s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 2 9 1 0 , 2 2 4 . 9 8 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 3 0 M S A E x p e n s e E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 3 1 T il i n g E 10 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 3 1 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 3 2 G r a v e l E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 3 2 1 3 8 , 7 9 2 . 0 4 1 4 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 2 3 . 5 9 1 4 6 , 9 7 6 . 4 1 9 9 . 6 5 % 1 4 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 3 3 A s p h a l t M a i n t / P a t c h i n g E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 2 3 3 1 3 4 , 1 3 7 . 1 4 1 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 7 6 . 1 0 1 6 9 , 5 2 3 . 9 0 9 9 . 7 2 % 1 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 0 0 1 , 1 7 7 . 0 0 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 2 , 0 6 5 . 0 0 9 8 . 3 3 % 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 Pu b l i c W o r k s F a c i l i t y 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 2 1 T e l e p h o n e E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 2 1 1 1 , 6 6 2 . 7 5 1 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 2 6 3 . 4 9 9 , 2 3 6 . 5 1 8 0 . 3 2 % 1 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 0 I n s u r a n c e ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 4 W o r k e r ' s C o m p I n s u r a n c e E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 6 4 1 8 , 6 4 6 . 0 0 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 , 1 5 4 . 0 0 1 2 , 8 4 6 . 0 0 7 1 . 3 7 % 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 8 0 U t il i t y & S e r v i c e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 10 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 8 0 1 8 , 8 6 9 . 8 0 1 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 9 0 9 . 8 4 1 5 , 0 9 0 . 1 6 7 9 . 4 2 % 1 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 8 1 S t r e e t / S i g n a l L i g h t s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 3 8 1 4 , 3 1 9 . 2 2 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 1 1 . 9 1 3 , 5 8 8 . 0 9 8 9 . 7 0 % 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 4 1 7 U n i f o r m s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 4 1 7 9 , 4 7 8 . 2 9 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 2 1 2 . 0 9 6 , 7 8 7 . 9 1 7 5 . 4 2 % 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 M i s c E x p e n s e E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 4 3 3 D u e s a n d M e m b e r s h i p s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 4 3 3 1 2 2 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 8 1 0 R e f u n d s / R e i m b u r s e m e n t s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 8 1 0 5 , 7 7 0 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 8 1 1 S t o r m D a m a g e I n s u r a n c e R e f u n d s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 0 0 - 8 1 1 - 2 , 6 6 6 . 4 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1, 3 2 3 , 7 4 8 . 5 0 $ 1 , 3 9 1 , 4 7 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 8 , 3 9 9 . 1 8 $ 1 , 1 7 3 , 0 7 0 . 8 2 $ 1 , 3 9 1 , 4 7 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Ic e & S n o w R e m o v a l E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 2 5 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 2 5 - 2 1 0 4 5 , 8 8 0 . 1 6 $ 3 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ 3 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 % En g i n e e e r i n g E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 7 0 - 2 6 0 C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 7 0 - 2 6 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 7 0 - 2 9 9 W a t e r s h e d L G U E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 7 0 - 2 9 9 0 . 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 7 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 7 0 - 3 0 0 9 9 , 6 8 3 . 4 9 2 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 9 , 1 8 6 . 1 0 1 3 , 3 1 3 . 9 0 5 9 . 1 7 % 2 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 7 0 - 3 0 3 E n g i n e e r i n g F e e s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 7 0 - 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 99 , 6 8 3 . 4 9 $ 3 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 1 8 6 . 1 0 $ 2 8 , 3 1 3 . 9 0 $ 3 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Em p l o y e e B e n e f i t C h g s E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 9 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 1 9 0 - 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 Re c y c l i n g E 1 0 0 - 4 3 2 3 2 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 2 3 2 - 2 1 0 3 , 0 7 3 . 3 5 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 3 2 3 2 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 3 2 3 2 - 3 0 0 8 , 3 0 2 . 9 9 6 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 6 0 8 . 7 1 4 , 6 9 1 . 2 9 7 4 . 4 6 % 6 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 11 , 3 7 6 . 3 4 $ 1 0 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 8 . 7 1 $ 8 , 6 9 1 . 2 9 $ 1 0 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ Pa r k s E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 0 0 W a g e s a n d S a l a r i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 0 0 4 0 , 2 9 8 . 1 1 5 5 , 4 0 4 . 0 0 1 5 , 9 6 5 . 9 5 3 9 , 4 3 8 . 0 5 7 1 . 1 8 % 5 5 , 4 0 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 1 0 O v e r t i m e E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 1 0 2 6 3 . 2 9 0 . 0 0 7 8 6 . 8 0 - 7 8 6 . 8 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 2 1 P E R A E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 2 1 9 9 2 . 5 5 2 , 1 0 6 . 0 0 3 9 9 . 4 9 1 , 7 0 6 . 5 1 8 1 . 0 3 % 2 , 1 0 6 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 2 2 F I C A E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 2 2 2 , 5 1 4 . 5 5 3 , 4 3 5 . 0 0 1 , 0 3 7 . 4 3 2 , 3 9 7 . 5 7 6 9 . 8 0 % 3 , 4 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 2 6 M e d i c a r e E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 2 6 5 8 8 . 1 5 8 0 3 . 0 0 2 4 2 . 6 3 5 6 0 . 3 7 6 9 . 7 8 % 8 0 3 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 3 2 M e d i c a l C a f e t e r i a P l a n E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 3 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 3 3 E m p l o y e r P a i d H S A E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 1 3 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 2 0 8 T r a i n i n g a n d I n s t r u c t i o n E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 2 0 8 0 . 0 0 3 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 2 5 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 2 1 0 O p e r a t i n g S u p p l i e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 2 1 0 2 1 , 8 8 8 . 3 1 4 7 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 7 , 8 5 4 . 4 1 3 9 , 2 7 0 . 5 9 8 3 . 3 3 % 4 7 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 2 2 0 R e p a i r / M a i n t S u p p l y ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 2 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 2 2 1 M a i n t e n a n c e P r o j e c t s E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 2 2 1 1 9 , 1 5 8 . 6 5 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 2 2 2 S e a l C o a t i n g E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 2 2 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 0 0 P r o f e s s i o n a l S r v s ( G E N E R A L ) E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 0 0 1 , 1 1 0 . 0 4 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 7 0 8 . 0 0 7 9 2 . 0 0 3 1 . 6 8 % 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 2 1 T e l e p h o n e E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 2 1 6 9 5 . 0 9 7 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 7 . 4 3 5 1 2 . 5 7 7 3 . 2 2 % 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 6 4 W o r k e r ' s C o m p I n s u r a n c e E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 6 4 2 , 4 8 3 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 , 0 1 4 . 0 0 - 6 , 0 1 4 . 0 0 - 2 0 0 . 4 7 % 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 8 0 U t il i t y & S e r v i c e s ( G E N E R A L ) E 10 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 3 8 0 6 , 0 6 2 . 3 7 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 7 6 8 . 1 1 3 , 7 3 1 . 8 9 6 7 . 8 5 % 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 4 1 7 U n i f o r m s E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 4 1 7 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 4 3 3 D u e s a n d M e m b e r s h i p s E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 4 3 3 0 . 0 0 3 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 8 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 5 3 0 I m p r o v e m e n t s O t h e r T h a n B l d g s E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 5 3 0 3 6 , 3 1 7 . 1 0 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 9 , 2 2 4 . 2 6 5 , 7 7 5 . 7 4 1 6 . 5 0 % 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 N o r t h w e s t T r a ils Grant E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 8 1 0 R e f u n d s / R e i m b u r s e m e n t s E 1 0 0 - 4 5 2 0 0 - 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 13 2 , 3 7 1 . 2 1 $ 1 7 1 , 2 7 8 . 0 0 $ 6 8 , 1 8 8 . 5 1 $ 1 0 3 , 0 8 9 . 4 9 $ 1 7 1 , 2 7 8 . 0 0 $ - $ Tr a n s f e r s t o / f r o m O t h e r F u n d s E 1 0 0 - 4 9 3 6 0 - 7 1 0 R e s i d u a l E q u i t y T r a n s f e r s E 1 0 0 - 4 9 3 6 0 - 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 0 0 - 4 9 3 6 0 - 7 2 0 O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r s E 1 0 0 - 4 9 3 6 0 - 7 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 % 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ To t a l E x p e n s e 4, 5 4 4 , 7 7 7 $ 4 , 9 5 3 , 8 9 9 $ 1 , 1 1 8 , 6 5 4 $ 3 , 8 3 5 , 2 4 5 $ 4 , 9 5 3 , 8 9 9 $ - $ GE N E R A L F U N D T O T A L S To t a l R e v e n u e 3, 0 6 4 , 1 2 7 $ 4 , 9 5 3 , 8 9 9 $ 2 4 8 , 8 5 9 $ 4 , 7 0 5 , 0 4 0 $ 94 . 9 8 % 4, 9 5 9 , 7 1 1 $ 5 , 8 1 2 $ To t a l E x p e n s e 4, 0 6 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 9 5 3 , 8 9 9 $ 1 , 1 1 8 , 6 5 4 $ 3 , 8 3 5 , 2 4 5 $ 77 . 4 2 % 4, 9 5 3 , 8 9 9 $ - $ To t a l R e v e n u e - T o t a l E x p e n s e ( 9 9 9 , 8 7 4 ) $ - $ ( 8 6 9 , 7 9 5 ) $ 8 6 9 , 7 9 5 $ 0% 5, 8 1 2 $ 5 , 8 1 2 $ Tr a n s f e r t o C I P a n d R e s e r v e s 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 6 0 , 0 0 0 $ - $ 2 6 0 , 0 0 0 $ 10 0 . 0 0 % 26 0 , 0 0 0 $ - $ 20 1 8 Y E A R E N D F O R E C A S T 5 o f 5 STAFF REPORT / Code Compliance Agenda Item: 11c. Council Meeting: April 25, 2019 Prepared By: Mike Pritchard Topic: CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT – 1st Quarter 2019 Action Required: Information Only *Complaints/Concerns are to date. 2019 1st Quarter Staff has updated the nuisance ordinance, forms, notifications, and process. We are utilizing an I-pad to complete inspection reports, take photos, and generate notices which will be mailed to property owners. Per Council direction, we will be driving street by street, section by section and proactively searching for violations. As everyone is aware, we had a large amount of deep snow this year that prevented us from starting any meaningful site inspections until recently. Thus far, our contract code enforcement person has completed 2 days of inspections and sent 11 notices. This is in addition to the 10 complaints we received so far this year. We have started in the southeast corner of town (section 36) and will work our way north, then back down across the entire city. During this first sweep, the City will be looking for properties with obvious and multiple violations. Please see the included map showing which streets have been driven to date. Later this year, we will also be conducting more specific sweeps such as weeds and tall grass. We will sweep for signs in the right-of-way on a regular and continuous basis. Staff will also be looking into our Home Occupation Ordinance and how we will address this. File Closed: Complaint 16-010 (4/1/2016): Home Occupation, Junk/Debris at 21XXX County Road 10. The property owner has been conducting a retail sales business from the property which is in violation of the Home Occupation Ordinance as well as an existing Conditional Use Permit on the property. The City has made multiple attempts to gain compliance, but the owner has refused to comply. This matter has been referred to the City Attorney. The matter has been to court and the City attorney is working with the property owner’s attorney to resolve. The matter was back in court in late August and was continued to October 31. The owner has ceased all business operations related to sales and is working to remove horses. The City was notified that operations had moved back onto the property. The matter has been forwarded to the City Attorney for further prosecution. The property owner was given through April 2018 to remove the horses. As of April 19, the property owner is still over their limit of horses allowed. The Humane Society removed two horses from the property due to health concerns, however two horses have since been born. The owner did not show up for their scheduled court date in October and a warrant has been issued by the district court. This matter continues to be prosecuted. UPDATE: The owner was in court this month for a final appearance. The owner removed all but 7 horses, cleaned up exterior debris, and all business operations have ceased. All violations have been resolved and the case has been dismissed by the judge. Complaints Concerns Total Nuisiance Junk/Junk Vehicles Grass & Weed Control Animal Violations Home Occupations Signs Referred to Public Works, Metro West, or City Engineer Misc. Compaints Concerns Cases Referred to City Attorney Building Permits - Zoning review Building Permits Grading or Driveway Permits Misc. Permits Overweight /Ag Vehicle Permits 18 11 0 0 1 1 2 3 0 34 86 1 7 9 Complaints and Concerns Permits and Zoning ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STIEG RD WILLOW DRIVE HACKAM ORE ROAD TRAIL HAVEN ROAD CAIN ROAD O A K D A L E D R STR EH LER ROAD PIONEER TR COUN TY R OA D 11 7 ROLLLING HILLS RD LARKIN RD (62ND AVE N) TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CITY OF GREENFIELD CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF M EDINA SCOTT LAKE BECHTOLD ROAD $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUSH CREEK 23 1465 987 11 36 27 24 14 25 34 26 10 35 15 22 33 13 23 12 32 30 31 19 2120 17 28 16 29 18 Code Enforcement Map4-17-2019 Roads Drive n 1,0 00 0 1,0 00 Feet Updated 4-19-1 9 ± Legend Corcoran Parcels Sections Roads Driven no yes STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 11d. Council Meeting: April 25, 2019 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Planning Commission Alternate Report Action Required: None-Informational Summary: In February the City Council interviewed and appointed members to the Planning Commission. As part of that discussion staff was directed to work with the Mayor and Planning Commission Chair Dean Jacobs to draft an ordinance amendment for Council consideration. A meeting was held with Mayor Thomas, Council liason to the Planning Commission Schultz, and Planning Commission Chair Jacobs on April 11th. The discussion focused on the pros and cons of adding an alternate to the commission. The recommendation from that meeting is to not amend the ordinance to include an alternate at this time. The primary drivers for the recommendation include the fact that any resident can attend Planning Commission meetings and share input as allowed now. Additionally, a lack of a quorum has not been an issue and members who are unable to attend can and should provide their input to the City Administrator to share in their absense. Further, by having additional applicants apply, the City is aware of any desire to serve so if there is an opening the City can review existing applications first if they wish. Financial/Budget: None. Council Action: None. Attachments: None. TO: Corcoran Mayor and City Councilmembers City Administrator Brad Martens FROM: Rolf Erickson, City Assessor DATE: April 5, 2019 RE: Open Book meeting for January 2, 2019 Assessment Once again the Corcoran Real Estate market continued to grow at a steady pace. Agricultural land values once again held steady. Calls, generated by the valuation notices, have been light. We had three people attend the open book meeting on the 11th of April and are in process of reviewing their properties. The majority of the calls that we have received have been from agricultural parcels. The calls have been in response to the Hennepin County Assessor’s reclassification of some farm properties to comply with Minnesota Statutes. AGGREGRATE PROPERTY TYPE GROWTH (Total market value growth of each property type) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Residential 2.9% 4% 5.2% 3.6% 2.1% Farm 0% -6%-.93% 0% 3.3% Commercial 0% 2.4%9.2% 6.2% 5.7% Industrial 0% 0%11.4% 3.3% 6.5% Total Market Value 2018 : $875,689,100 Total Market Value 2019: $933,169,700 New Improvements 2019: $32,607,800 (included in the 2019 market value) Net Change: $24,872,800 (2019-2018-Improvements) The above changes are total class changes. Individual property changes varied by location and amenities. Please note that the above data is from the Hennepin County Assessor’s Annual Report issued in March. The most current data is available on the monthly property type tables distributed by the County Assessor. Included with this memo is a book of sales for the 2019assessment, pay 2020tax year. This book was generated from the new Hennepin County Assessor’s data base. The complete Hennepin County Assessor’s annual report is available at the following on the County’s website. https://www.hennepin.us/residents/property/property-value#county-assessor-report Item 11e. City of Corcoran 2019 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 12. May 9, 2019 – Kevin and Jessica unable to attend • Annual Fire Department Report – Rogers Fire Department • Public Hearing 2019 Dust Control Project • Compost site options • Campaign Sign Enforcement Policy • City Hall Remodel – Update on Design and Finance Plan • Ordinance Update – Water and Sewer Ordinance May 23, 2019 • Employee Recognition – Ryan Burns – 25 Years of Service • Planning Project Update • Acting City Administrator Appointment • Discussion on setbacks for new developments • Low cost paving options • 2018 Audit Presentation • Ravinia 11th Addition Final Plat and Final PUD June 13, 2019 – Brad unable to attend • Annual Liquor License and Tobacco Renewal • 2019 Clean-up Day report • Authorize Bond Sale • Non-chloride options for dust control • Test Well Approval June 27, 2019 • Planning Project Update • 2020 Budget Direction • Water Supply Planning Report – Progress/next steps • Rolling Hills Acres Preliminary Plat July 11, 2019 • July 25, 2019 • Planning Project Update • Code Compliance Quarterly Report • Financial Management Plan Update • Financial Performance Report