Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019-02-28 Council Agenda Packet
*Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet by Door. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the website at www.ci.corcoran.mn.us. Corcoran City Council Agenda February 28, 2019 - 7:00pm 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval 4. Commission Representatives* 5. Open Forum 6. Presentations/Recognitions a. Planning Commission Annual Report and 2019 Priorities* b. Parks and Trails Commission Annual Report and 2019 Priorities* 7. Consent Agenda a. Draft Minutes of February 14, 2019 Council Meeting* b. Draft Minutes of February 14, 2019 Council Work Session* c. Liquor License Transfer – Corcoran Bottle Shop* d. Accept Plans and Authorize Bids for CSAH 101 & 100th Ave Turn Lane Improvements* e. Administrative Assistant Job Description Update* f. Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Variances for Dahlheimer Farms at 20702 County Road 50* g. Financial Claims* 8. Planning Business a. Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for Ravinia 11th Addition* b. 2040 Comprehensive Plan* c. Preliminary Plat Extension Request – Sawgrass* d. City-Initiated Bee Keeping Ordinance* 9. Unfinished Business 10. New Business a. Wetland Conservation Act and LGU Responsibilities* b. Planning Commission Appointments* c. Parks and Trails Commission Appointments* d. Hennepin County Corridor Planning Program* e. Park Planning Proposals* f. Accepting a Donation* 11. Staff Reports a. Planning Project Update* 12. 2019 Council Schedule* 13. Council Liaison Calendar Planning Commission 3/7/19 4/4/19 Schultz Schultz Parks and Trails Commission 3/19/19 4/16/19 Keefe Keefe 14. Adjournment STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 4. Council Meeting: February 28, 2019 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commission Representatives Action Required: None – Informational Summary: The advisory commission representatives for the January 24th Council meeting are as follows: Planning Commission: Jim Shoulak Parks and Trails Commission: Judy Strehler Financial/Budget: N/A Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: Transparency We believe that open an honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry. Processes and decision making should include opportunities to educate citizens and receive feedback. Options: N/A Recommendation N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: N/A 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 6a. MEMO Meeting Date: February 28, 2019 To: City Council From: Planning Commission Re: Planning Commission Accomplishments and Priorities ______________________________________________________________________ As requested by the City Council, the Planning Commission is to update the Council on activities of the previous year and priorities for 2019. The following are some of the activities completed in 2018: Reviewed an amendment to the sign ordinance regarding dynamic signs Reviewed a variance and site plan for accessory buildings at Pheasant Acres Golf Club Reviewed a Final PUD Development plan for Bass Lake Estates Recommended changes to ordinances regarding dog kennels Reviewed a Final PUD Development Plan and PUD amendments for Ravinia 9 th addition and 10th addition Reviewed the proposed purchase of park land from the Rockford School District Reviewed a home relocation plan Reviewed a Preliminary Plat for Rush Creek Run Reviewed a Conditional Use Permit for High 5 Companies Reviewed a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Bellwether Reviewed a Variance and Site Plan Amendment for building expansion and bus parking Held the public hearing for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Reviewed a PUD Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for Bellwether; reviewed Final Plat and Final PUD Development Plan for Bellwether 1st addition Reviewed a PUD Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for Fehn Meadows 2nd addition Reviewed an ordinance amendment for event centers Reviewed ordinance amendments for ROW, Small Cell, and DAC Reviewed an ordinance amendment for financial guarantee requirements Reviewed ordinance amendments for nuisances Reviewed a Final Plat and Final PUD and amendments for Bass Lake Crossing 2 nd addition In 2019 the Planning Commission has the following priorities: Process ordinance amendments as required to by the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Review zoning requirements for development districts; look into options for fewer Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) The Planning Commission appreciates the support of the City Council and requests feedback on its proposed priorities for 2019. Attachments: N/A 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 6b. MEMO Meeting Date: February 28, 2019 To: City Council From: Parks and Trails Commission Re: Parks and Trails Commission Annual Report and 2019 and Priorities ______________________________________________________________________ As requested by the City Council, the Parks and Trails Commission is to update the Council on activities of the previous year and priorities for 2019. The following are some of the activities completed in 2018: Reviewed and recommended PUD amendments for Ravinia 9th addition. Reviewed playground proposals for the Wildflower Park, invited residents to vote for the playground vendor, recommended a vendor and budget to Council, oversaw the community build for the playground, and recommended naming the park Wildflower Park. Reflected on the history of the Parks and Trails Commission. Discussed potential for park acquisition of the Rockford School District property, recommended funding options for purchasing the land, reviewed shared usages of City Park, reviewed the wetland delineation, and recommended park master planning RFP for City Park with the addition of the Rockford School District property. Reviewed the preliminary plat for Rush Creek Run. Reviewed and adjusted the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Coordinated the annual tree giveaway. Received the annual report from Director of Public Safety, Matt Gottschalk. Received the annual report from Public Works Director, Kevin Mattson. Reviewed the Surface Water Management Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan from Susan Nelson from Wenck Associates. Reviewed the rezoning, preliminary plat, and preliminary PUD for Fehn Meadows 2nd addition; approved cash-in-lieu of land fee for park dedication. Reviewed the rezoning, preliminary plat, and preliminary PUD for Bellwether. Recommended using the Twins Grant and donation from the NW Area Jaycees to finance the irrigation of Meister Field. Reviewed boardwalk examples and established preferences for Bellwether trails. Reviewed necessary maintenance that should be done in the Memorial Garden at City Hall. Accepted the resignation of Commissioner Trish Krueger. Reviewed the 2019 budget in relation to parks. Reviewed the 2019 fee schedule. Reviewed the 2018 spring baseball survey results. Welcomed Phillip Christenson as a new Commissioner. Recommended the naming of the press box at City Park be named after Kevin Dale. Reviewed upcoming park development projects and timelines. Recommended bringing the County road trail corridor feasibility study to Council. Provided regular updates on Garden Club activities. Provided regular updates from the Elm Creek Watershed Commission. Attended the City Council meetings as liaisons from the Commission. Received regular updates on the City Council meetings. Received regular Recreation Coordinator updates. Received regular Country Daze updates. In 2019, the Parks and Trails Commission have the following priorities: Complete Wildflower Park with regard to maintenance plans and additional items (benches, signage, etc.) City Park master planning. Discuss and begin planning for the park in Bellwether. Discuss and begin planning for the open space park in Ravinia. Discuss opportunity for snowmobile trails in Corcoran as growth takes place. Begin planning and implementing additional leisure and recreation programs. The Parks and Trails Commission appreciates the support of the City Council and requests feedback on its proposed priorities for 2019. Attachments: N/A CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes February 14, 2019 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on February 14, 2019 at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were Mayor Thomas, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Dejewski, Councilor Keefe, and Councilor Schultz. Also present were City Administrator Martens, City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Beise, Public Works Director Mattson, and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor Thomas called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Thomas invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Martens noted the addition of a letter that was inadvertently missed from the packet for Item 8a. outlining questions and concerns regarding the preliminary plat. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Dejewski to approve the agenda as presented. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 4.Commission Representatives Mayor Thomas noted Planning Commissioner Meredith Wu and Parks and Trails Commissioner Meister were in attendance and invited them to speak on items related to the Commission. 5.Open Forum Meredith Wu, 8695 Cain Road, addressed the Council with questions on Item 9b. City Hall – Remodel – Construction Manager Model. Ms. Wu inquired about which other cities are utilizing the Sourcewell program. Per Council request Ms. Wu noted her background as an architect. Ms. Wu inquired about local contractors and the low cost of the estimated fee. 6.Presentations/Recognitions No presentations were heard. 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of January 24, 2019 Council Meeting b.Draft Minutes for January 24, 2019 Council Meeting c.Financial Claims d.Charitable Gambling Permit – Elks e.Pay Request #2 – Northeast Trunk Sewer Improvements MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Keefe to approve the consent agenda as presented. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 8.Planning Business a. Kariniemi Preliminary Plat City Administrator Martens presented the report noting the concerns presented in the letter regarding the project have been addressed. Council discussed private drives. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the standards for private driveways meet public safety standards. Council discussed parking on private drives. City Administrator Martens noted private drives are recorded easements. Nate Karinimei addressed the Council and noted he currently owns the property and 7a. understands the City’s desire for less driveways on collector roads. Council discussed private drives. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Keefe to adopt Resolution 2019-03 Approving Preliminary Plat for “20801 Larkin Road” for Nate Kariniemi on the 7.98 site located at 20801 Larkin Road (PID 27-119-23-41-0009) (City File 18-037). Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 9. Unfinished Business a. City Hall Remodel – Council Chamber Design City Administrator Martens presented the report outlining the design options for the Council. Council discussed seating at the dais and for staff, monitors for Council to view, and not being distracted by screens. Council discussed the additional screen locations. Council could discussed acoustics and a better sound system. Council discussed having enough seats for large events. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the staff had not yet completed the code enforcement review. Council discussed safety and bulletproofing. City Administrator Martens noted the podium would provide an opportunity for presenters to see their presentation. Council discussed a movable podium and events in the space. Council discussed community room use. Per consensus, staff was provided direction on the various elements of the remodeled Council Chambers. b. City Hall Remodel – Construction Manager Model City Administrator Martens presented the report outlining the options for construction management. Council discussed construction manager advisor, construction manager at risk, general contractors, and the Sourcewell option. Planning Commissioner Wu inquired about goals for small and minority owned companies and goals that City might have and if those are calculated into the costs. Council inquired if the City had LEED or other goals for projects. City Administrator Martens noted as a matter of policy the City could adopt requirements, but at this time the City does not have these goals. City Administrator Martens noted the Sourcewell option typically seems to work well with project between one and three million. Council discussed who is responsible for the project under the Sourcewell option. City Administrator Martens noted the project coordinator is selected to manage the project. Council discussed the Sourcewell option and inquired about the number or project coordinators. City Administrator Martens noted there are six or seven firms who are project coordinators. Council discussed the limited number of project coordinators with Sourcewell and general contractor concerns. Planning Commissioner Wu noted in a general contractor model some City’s have departments to manage and with a general contractor staff would be the owner’s representative. Council discussed hiring a project manager and the difference between the Sourcewell option, a construction manager, and a project manager. City Administrator Martens noted the Sourcewell project coordinator firms were well known construction management companies and would be responsible to see the project completed. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk spoke to his positive experience with cooperatives. Council discussed wanting to know more about cooperative pricing in contracting. Council discussed use of general contractors and the City staff involvement. City Administrator Martens noted concern for a general contractor is limited staff time and lack of expertise in construction. Council discussed general contracting, price, and construction manager at-risk. Per consensus, staff was directed to move forward with the Sourcewell option. Council inquired about Sourcewell and how long it’s been in business. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the organization was successful in leveraging multiple sources for low contract pricing. c. Deputy Clerk and Administrative Services Director Appointment City Administrator Martens presented the report outlining the hiring process and the candidates for appointment. Council inquired about the Recreation Coordinator on the organizational chart. City Administrator Martens noted the Recreation Coordinator reports to himself. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Keefe to appoint Michelle Friedrich to Deputy Clerk at Grade 8 Year 2 effective upon the start date of the Administrative Assistant. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Bottema to authorize staff to initiate recruitment of the administrative assistant position. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Dejewski to approve the Administrative Services Director job description. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Keefe to appoint Jessica Beise to Administrative Services Director at Grade 12 Year 4 effective April 6, 2019. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) 10. New Business a. Met Council SAC Deferral Program City Administrator Martens presented the report noting the total sewer connect project cost for Maple Hills Estates was approximately $400,000 which a grant would pay for a portion leaving the owner to finance the rest of the project. City Administrator Martens noted the current financing rate for the SAC deferral program is 2.27%. Council discussed what happens if business ceases. City Administrator Martens noted the payments would stop and if a new business were to take over any remaining charges would be due. Council discussed the master plan and the programs effect on other businesses. City Administrator Martens noted staff time and attorney time would be needed for setting up the program. Council discussed the interest rate and who the City would be in agreement with. City Administrator Martens noted the City would set up the program with the Metropolitan Council and then have individual agreements with those taking part in the program. Council discussed financing businesses capital projects and staff time. City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Beise noted staff must currently complete monthly SAC reports and issues claims for the Metropolitan Council. Council discussed having the applicant pay for the fees as the City would require those who request City Code amendments. Council discussed the equal treatment of businesses and available financing options for businesses. Council discussed the importance of stability for low income housing. Council discussed the Metropolitan Council program. City Administrator Martens noted the City would establish the program. Council discussed the program further, impact on a low-income community, and utilization of staff time. Council discussed other businesses utilizing the program. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Schultz to direct staff to enter into the SAC deferral program and draft an agreement between the City of Corcoran and Maple Hill Estates. City Administrator Martens inquired about who would pay the set-up fees for the program. Councilor Dejewski noted Maple Hill Estates would be responsible for paying for setting up the program if they would utilize the program. Council discussed program costs, staff time, opportunity costs, and policies. Voting Aye: Dejewski and Schultz Nay: Thomas, Bottema, and Keefe (Motion failed 2:3) b. City Council Training Budget City Administrator Martens presented the report noting that the City pay for the training in advance or have Councilmembers submit reimbursements. Council gave an example of a training a member wanted to attend and discussed having members utilize funds at their discretion. Per consensus, Council allocated $300 per person for training and for the training budget to be reviewed as needed with members reallocating funds if requested. 11. Staff Reports a. Origin and Destination Study Public Works Director Mattson presented the report noting the amount traffic on County Road 10 may impact the County’s planning for County Road 50. Council discussed the study findings for County Road 10 and the impact on City plans. Council inquired about future planning for County Road 30 and the interconnection with MN Highway 610. City Administrator Martens noted the study wouldn’t impact the current Comprehensive Plan, but the results are helpful for long range planning. City Council discussed County Road 50 and the reason for the study. City Administrator Martens noted the traffic pattern information is helpful for planning. Council discussed the turnback of County Road 10. b. Code Compliance Annual Report City Administrator Martens noted City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Beise met with Kendra to discuss the code enforcement contract and processes. Council inquired about the program. City Administrator Martens noted staff would be completing regular reporting on code enforcement. City Clerk/Administrative Services noted staff would be meeting to start the consultant onboarding process. 12. 2019 Council Schedule City Administrator Martens reviewed the Council schedule, noting the work session prior to the meeting. 13. Council Liaison Calendar The Council liaison calendar was not reviewed but was available in the Council Packet. 14. Adjournment MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Keefe to adjourn. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and Schultz (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:01 pm. ________________________________ Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Work Session Minutes February 14, 2019 – 6:20 pm The Corcoran City Council met on February 14, 2019 in work session, at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were Mayor Thomas, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Dejewski, and Councilor Schultz. Councilor Keefe was excused. Also present were City Administrator Martens and City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Beise. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor Thomas called the work session to order at 6:20 pm 2.Planning Commission Interviews Council interviewed Planning Commissioner Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Jacobs, and Dorothy Theis. Council discussed alternates for the planning commission. 3.Adjournment MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) Meeting adjourned at 6:55 pm. ________________________________ Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator 7b. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7c. Council Meeting: February 28, 2019 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Liquor License Transfer – Corcoran Bottle Shop Action Required: Approval Summary: The City received a request for a change to the ownership for Corcoran Bottleshop (JDT Inc.) as the owner recently passed away and the owner’s wife would like to retain ownership of the establishment. Staff received the appropriate paperwork and has begun work with the police department on the standard background investigation for liquor licenses. Staff recommends approval of the liquor license ownership transfer. Financial/Budget: N/A Council Action: 1. Adopt Resolution 2019-14 Amending The Ownership On Liquor License Number 2018-02 Attachments: 1. Resolution 2019-14 Amending The Ownership On Liquor License Number 2018- 02 City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-14 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE OWNERSHIP ON LIQUOR LICENSE NUMBER 2018-02 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corcoran issued an off-sale liquor license via license number 2018-02 to JDT, Inc., effective through June 30, 2019; and WHEREAS, JDT, Inc. has provided evidence to the City that the owner has passed away and a liquor license application has been submitted by his spouse, Terri-Lynn Bevins, to take control of the operation with no changes to the current off-sale license; and WHEREAS, JDT, Inc. desires to amend the off-sale liquor license to reflect the updated ownership; and WHEREAS, all other aspects of the license number 2018-02 shall remain unchanged; and WHEREAS, the Police Department will conduct a background investigation on the applicant and upon successful completion the license amendment is recommended for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota that the City Council hereby directs the City Clerk to amend license number 2018- 02 to reflect the new owner, Terri-Lynn Bevins and upon successful completion of a background investigation, submit the application to be filed with the State of Minnesota. All other representations and requirements of license number 2018-02 shall remain unchanged. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February, 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Engineer’s Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - To: Brad Martens, City Administrator From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Date: February 21, 2019 Subject: CSAH 101 & 100th Avenue Turn Lane Improvements Council Action Requested Motion to accept the plans and authorize to bid the CSAH 101 & 100th Avenue Turn Lane Improvements to serve the Bellwether development. Background The Bellwether development is moving forward with construction thus triggering a need for improvements on County Road 101. The County directs the design requirements of the improvements through the access permit process, which also involved input from Maple Grove. Staff and Wenck have had numerous discussions with the County following up with construction plan reviews on alignment. Improvements Improvements include “south bound right, north bound left and through lanes”. The County also required a center island at the intersection of 100th Avenue to the east and a center island on CSAH 101 as shown on sheet C-602 (attached figure). The County’s intent is to eliminate the ability for southbound traffic to turn left (east) off CSAH 101 to 100th Avenue, as a “shortcut” through a residential area of Maple Grove. Cost, Funding and Schedule The project is developer funded and estimated at approximately $315,000 (attached table) and adequate escrow remains to complete the bidding. Prior to award, the developer will contribute cash escrow to cover all project costs including construction, engineering, administration, utilities, easements, etc. February Thursday 28th – Council Accepts Plans and Authorize to Bid March Public bid process April Tuesday 2nd – Bids Open Thursday 11th – Council approval (contract can be awarded contingent upon receipt of cash escrow) Substantial completion is targeted for July 1st, which allows for competitive pricing and coincides with the Pulte input on schedule. End of Memo 7d. CSAH 101 AND 100TH AVENUE TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS Bid Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal BASE BID: 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 3 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LUMP SUM 1 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 5 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 2045 3.50$ 7,157.50$ 6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 800 4.50$ 3,600.00$ 7 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 40 20.00$ 800.00$ 8 REMOVE STORM PIPE LIN FT 42 25.00$ 1,050.00$ 9 REMOVE CMP FLARED END SECTION EACH 2 100.00$ 200.00$ 10 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL LUMP SUM 1 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 11 CONNECT TO EXISTING 15" CMP EACH 2 100.00$ 200.00$ 12 15" CMP STORM SEWER LF 22 30.00$ 660.00$ 13 15" CMP FLARED-END SECTION EACH 2 200.00$ 400.00$ 14 SALVAGE & RESPREAD EXISTING TOPSOIL LUMP SUM 1 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 15 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (EV)CU YD 630 25.00$ 15,750.00$ 16 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (EV)CU YD 50 30.00$ 1,500.00$ 17 COMMON BORROW (CV)CU YD 500 30.00$ 15,000.00$ 18 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V WOVEN SQ YD 2590 2.00$ 5,180.00$ 19 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED TON 1068 22.00$ 23,496.00$ 20 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2, 100 % CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 130 35.00$ 4,550.00$ 21 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT MATERIAL GAL 115 3.50$ 402.50$ 22 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 522 90.00$ 46,980.00$ 23 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 522 80.00$ 41,760.00$ 24 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B424 LF 225 30.00$ 6,750.00$ 25 3" CONCRETE MEDIAN SQ YD 81 75.00$ 6,075.00$ 26 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 59.00 75.00$ 4,425.00$ 27 INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH 13 200.00$ 2,600.00$ 28 HYDROMULCH - SEED MIXTURE 25-151 SQ YD 1844 3.00$ 5,532.00$ 29 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 SQ YD 550 1.00$ 550.00$ 30 SEED MIXTURE 25-151 SQ YD 130 1.00$ 130.00$ 31 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 1725 3.00$ 5,175.00$ 32 12-INCH SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG LIN FT 70 5.00$ 350.00$ 33 CULVERT PROTECTION EACH 2 150.00$ 300.00$ 34 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 30 125.00$ 3,750.00$ 35 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 30 50.00$ 1,500.00$ 36 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3N STRAW 2S SQ YD 680 3.50$ 2,380.00$ 37 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RT ARROW) THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)EACH 2 300.00$ 600.00$ 38 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LT ARROW) THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)EACH 2 300.00$ 600.00$ 39 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 2721 1.50$ 4,081.50$ 40 6" SOLID LINE WHITE - THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 3000 0.75$ 2,250.00$ 41 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 1010 0.75$ 757.50$ 42 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW - THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 445 10.00$ 4,450.00$ 43 24" SOLID LINE WHITE STOP BAR - THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 15 10.00$ 150.00$ SUBTOTAL:260,592.00$ 10% CONTINGENCY 26,059.20$ SUBTOTAL:286,651.20$ 10% ENGINEERING 28,665.12$ ESTIMATED TOTAL 315,316.32$ STAFF REPORT Agenda Item. 7e. Council Meeting: February 28, 2019 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Administrative Assistant Job Description Action Required: Approval Summary: On February 14, 2019 the Council authorized staff to begin a recruitment process for the administrative assistant position. The job description has changed slightly due to Administrative Department restructuring. Attached is an updated job description. Financial/Budget: N/A Council Action: 1. Approve the Administrative Assistant job description. Attachments: 1. Administrative Assistant Job Description ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT ©City of Corcoran 2015 1 Job Summary: The Administrative Assistant serves as the primary contact for the City over the phone and in-person inquiries. The position is a support position providing assistance in customer service, communications, facilities use management and records retention for the Administration Department, City Council and City Commissions. The Administrative Assistant serves as a back up to the Public Safety Administrative Assistant. Scope of Impact: The Administrative Assistant impacts the initial impression of the City and effectiveness of the department. This position performs assigned duties without a need for significant work direction on daily tasks. Work is guided by the City Clerk/Administrative Services CoordinatorDirector. The job has no supervisory responsibility. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: • Provides office support for the City. o Assists as the front desk support/receptionist answering phone calls and responding to in- person inquires, making referrals to appropriate staff when required; monitors and reports trends in citizen calls and inquiries; o Assists callers or persons when the City Administrator responsible staff is occupied by managing their inquiry or taking a detailed message, determining whether the priority is high enough to interrupt another call or meeting; o Assists citizens with information about applications, including but not limited to processes and contact information; o Assists the Police Department in the absence of the Public Safety Administrative Assistant; o Maintains a supply of department forms and office materials; o Coordinates supply ordering and equipment contract coordination; o Issues over-the-counter building permits and receives applications for permits requiring inspector approval; o Accepts payments for permits and utility billing; o Assists all departments as needed. • Provides support to the City Administrator and City Clerk/Administrative Services CoordinatorDirector. o Prepares correspondence, agendas and presentations as requested; o Develops project plan for events/meetings and coordinates related publicity; Department: Administration Reports To: City Clerk/Administrative Services CoordinatorDirector Points: 212206 Grade: 6 FLSA: Non-Exempt Bargaining Unit: NA Revision Date: July, 20185 City of Corcoran Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25" ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT ©City of Corcoran 2015 2 o Oversees the logistics for events/meetings, including scheduling and set up of facilities, equipment, and refreshments/catering as needed; o Assists with hiring including job posting, receiving applications, maintaining a record of applications and responding to applicants; o Coordinates invitations, enrollment and award selection processes. • Assists with the City’s Communications needs. o Maintains the content of the City’s website; o Assists with the City’s social media presence, updating the sites as information is available; o Prepares Assists in the preparation of the City newsletter, including gathering articles, coordinating the layout, editing, printing and distribution; o Assists with creating informational materials including brochures, flyers, postcards, etc. for all departments. o Distributes the links to the Council and Commission meeting packets. • Coordinates City facility rentals and use. o Oversees the rental/use of the Civic Center, Council Chambers, Conference Room, City Park or other recreational facilities; provides instructions to users relating to facility use; o Coordinates with Public Works and Public Safety for rental needs. • Provides City Council and City Commission support. o Assembles packets and handouts for City Council and Commission Meetings; o Prepares correspondence, agendas and presentations as requested; o Coordinates the preparation and distribution of agenda information for City Council and Commission meetings; o Oversees the logistics for Council, Commission and other community meetings, including scheduling of facilities, equipment, refreshment requirements as needed. • Coordinates the document scanning program. o Scans new documents for retention in City files and organizes them based on the overall document filing convention; o Coordinates the scanning of the City’s existing paper files; o Ensures that electronic files are regularly backed up per policy. • Performs other duties and activities as assigned. Minimum Qualifications: Candidates for this position must have high school diploma or equivalent and four or more years of experience in an office support role. Desired Qualifications: Additional desired qualifications include: additional office support experience, experience in a municipal setting, an associate’s degree, familiarity with website maintenance and communications, and expertise in a variety of computer Microsoft Office software programs (Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, etc.). Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance: • Customer service skills including demonstrated ability to build positive relationships with employees and managers; Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25" ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT ©City of Corcoran 2015 3 • Knowledge of data privacy laws and ability to maintain highest confidentiality when dealing with sensitive or private information; • Knowledge of the functions and responsibilities of City Departments, staff, and key community members; • Knowledge of city computer system, county programs, and the city financial program; • Knowledge of and ability to operate standard office software sufficient to manipulate data, draft reports and maintain records; • Ability to analyze and resolve problems; • The ability to work independently and to prioritize work requests; ability to plan, coordinate and prioritize workload to meet project deadlines; • Verbal and high-level written communication skills sufficient to effectively present information and respond to questions from a wide variety of audiences, and reading comprehension skills sufficient to read, understand and interpret complex and varied work-related materials; • Ability to work with neighboring municipalities and outside professional organizations to continue to learn and bring efficiencies within our organization. Physical and Mental Requirements: Physical effort is light, with lifting or carrying up to 25 pounds intermittently. Report preparation and word processing will at times require extended use of a keyboard. Work interruptions are frequent. Working Conditions: Work is performed in a normal office environment. May be the first person to whom an inquiry is delivered by a citizen, and may involve dealing with and calming individuals who are emotionally charged over an issue. Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator and City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator retain the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: JP Mansolf through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: February 20, 2019 for the February 28, 2019 City Council Meeting RE: Preliminary plat, final plat and variances for “Dahlheimer Farms” on property located at 20702 County Road 50 (PID 22-119-23-41-0001) (City File 18-041) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: March 5, 2019 1.Application Request Peter and Jean Dahlheimer are requesting approval of a preliminary plat, final plat and variances from the minimum lot size, minimum lot width, and allowed accessory structure requirements for a two-lot subdivision to be known as “Dahlheimer Farms”. 2.Planning Commission Meeting Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat and variances at their regularly scheduled meeting on February 7, 2019. Other than the applicant, there was no one was present to speak at the public hearing. Commissioners had one question relating to the location of the access for the proposed outlot. Planning Commissioners voted 3-0 to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and variances. 3.Context Background On November 8, 2018, the City reviewed and approved a request to waive the Topography and Wetland Delineation survey requirements for property located at 20702 County Road 50. The applicants’ request will create one five-acre lot and one 34.94-acre outlot. They intend to keep farming the proposed outlot while selling the proposed five-acre lot. The subdivision would require variances from the minimum lot size, minimum lot width and allowed accessory structure requirements. The City approved a similar case for Donald Proehl in 2014. The subject property in this case was also zoned Urban Reserve and located within the MUSA and required variances to allow for the subdivision of an existing farmstead and agricultural land. The City granted variances from the minimum lot size and lot depth for the two new lots. Agenda Item: 7f. 2 Dahlheimer Farms (city file 18-041) February 28, 2019 Zoning and Land Use The property is guided Low Density Residential and zoned Urban Reserve. The property is in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is in the final phase of the planned MUSA staging. All the surrounding properties are zoned Urban Reserve. The properties to the west and south are guided Low Density Residential. The property to the north is guided Agricultural Preserve. The properties to the east are guided Existing Residential and Low Density Residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site There are several different wetlands on site, located in both the proposed lot and proposed outlot, as shown on the Hennepin County Natural Resources Map. A wetland delineation exemption was previously granted for the wetlands located on the proposed outlot. A wetland delineation report for the proposed Lot 1 is attached. A 100-year FEMA floodplain surrounds Rush Creek, located on site. Rush Creek also is also surrounded by a Shoreland Overlay District. If future development is proposed this could restrict future development and should be noted in future plans. Development Rights The property currently has four development rights. The applicant did not specifically request how the three remaining development rights would be allocated. Staff recommends the three remaining development rights be applied to the proposed outlot. It is important to note that this property is within the MUSA, and it is intended to transition from agricultural use into low density residential use once sewer and water are extended. Parks and Trails The Parks and Trails Map from both the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows two proposed trails on or adjacent to the site. A proposed off-road trail would run through the northern portion of the site, while a proposed on-road trail would be located on County Road 50 directly south of the site. 4. Analysis Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. A. Level of Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a preliminary plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outline in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance and the conditions of the preliminary plat approval. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat. The City’s discretion in approving a final plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance and the conditions of preliminary plat approval. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat. 3 Dahlheimer Farms (city file 18-041) February 28, 2019 The City’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Preliminary Plat Access A portion of the existing property is shown being dedicated as Hennepin County right-of-way for County Road 50. Access to the outlot is proposed off County Road 50. According to their plat review memo, Hennepin County is not precluding the proposed access off County Road 50 but did state their intent to seek access consolidation upon further subdivision or development of the property, as it is their policy to limit access along county roads. The City is recommending that the 60-foot lot width for Outlot A be expanded to 80 feet so that the City would also have the option of shifting Cain Road west when the Outlot is developed. This change would reduce the size of Lot 1 from 5.00 acres to 4.84 acres. The proposed Cain Road extension is shown in the figure below: A ½ right-of-way for Cain Road was dedicated with the Corcoran Estates plat to the east. Upon development of Outlot A, the City Engineer is recommending the following: 4 Dahlheimer Farms (city file 18-041) February 28, 2019 • A 40-foot ½ right-of-way for Cain Road be dedicated along the east boundary of the property • Street and utility connections and rights-of-way be dedicated for a connection from 78th Avenue North (within Corcoran Estates) to the property to the west (Eagle Ridge Outlot A). These changes would reduce the size of Lot 1 from 5.00 acres to 4.84 acres. Natural Resources/Wetlands A wetland delineation report has been completed for the wetlands in in proposed Lot 1. The applicant must submit the wetland delineation to the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) for review and approval. The ECWMC’s review period runs from May 15- October 15. The final plat cannot be recorded with Hennepin County until the wetland delineation is approved by the ECWMC. Staff finds that City approval of the plat can be granted contingent upon ECWMC approval of the delineation. The plat shows that all structures meet required buffers and setbacks for wetlands. Wetland buffer monuments are required to be installed as indicated in Section 1050.10, Subd. 7. Plans should be revised to show the location of the buffer monuments. City Code typically requires that buffers around wetlands be planted with vegetation in accordance with Section 1050.10, Subd. 8. However, since no development is proposed staff recommends that the applicant simply not mow the wetland buffer area allowing natural vegetation to grow and act as a vegetative buffer. Lot Standards The proposed lots will remain zoned as Urban Reserve (UR). The following table shows the lot standards for the UR district: Minimum Lot Area 20 Acres Minimum Lot Width 300 feet Minimum Lot Depth 300 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, from Major Roadways 100 feet From, from all other streets 50 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 40 feet Side 25 feet Rear 30 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet The proposed subdivision meets all lot standards, except for the following: • The proposed Lot 1 does not meet the minimum 20-acre lot size requirement and requires a variance to allow for the subdivision. • The proposed outlot does not meet the 300 ft. minimum lot width, with a lot width of 60 feet (with a condition requiring it to be expanded to 80 feet) at the front lot line. A variance is required to allow the subdivision. 5 Dahlheimer Farms (city file 18-041) February 28, 2019 • The existing residential structure does not meet the 50-foot minimum front setback. However, because the structure is an existing non-conforming use it will not require a variance to allow for the subdivision. Accessory Structure Standards According to Section 1030.020, Subd. 3 (E), accessory agricultural uses shall be a minimum of 100 feet from all property lines. By obtaining the 40 feet of ROW on the east border of Lot 1, the easternmost barn will become a nonconforming structure with a setback of 88.6 feet. The barn is considered a legal non-conforming structure and will not require a variance to allow for the subdivision. All other existing accessory buildings meet all setback requirements A 4.84-acre lot is allowed 2,375 sq. ft. of detached accessory structure area according to Section 1030.020, Subd. 4 (E). As shown on the existing conditions survey, there is a total of 5,945.6 sq. ft. of detached accessory buildings area. A variance is required to allow for the accessory structures to exist on the proposed Lot 1. Park Dedication Because no new development is proposed, no park dedication is required at this time. For future development, it is important to consider the two proposed trails indicated on the 2030 Parks and Trails Plan. If future development is proposed, Park dedication will be required and an easement for the off-road trail will be needed. Final Plat The applicant has also requested approval of a final plat. The final plat requires action by the City Council. However, the plat cannot be recorded until a wetland delineation is approved by the ECWMC. Variances Variances are requested for the following: • To allow for the lot size of the proposed Lot 1. It does not meet the minimum lot size requirement. • To allow for the width of the proposed outlot. It does not meet the 300 ft. minimum lot width. • To allow for the existing accessory structures which would exceed the maximum allowed detached accessory structure area for a 4.84-acre lot. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all of the variance criteria in Section 970.030 of the Zoning Ordinance have been met. Staff finds that criteria have been met as follows: 1. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. Minimum Lot Size: The applicant intends to keep the outlot as farmland and sell Lot 1 as residential property. The size of Lot 1 generally follows the portion of the site that is not used 6 Dahlheimer Farms (city file 18-041) February 28, 2019 as farm land and uses the wetlands present on-site as a natural border for the parcel. If the applicant followed the 20-acre minimum lot size, the residential property would have to include a portion of the farm land. This would prevent the sale of proposed Lot 1 as exclusively residential property and would not maintain the integrity of the farming operation under the ownership of the Dahlheimers. Minimum Lot Width: The proposed lot width is a result of the need for access to the outlot. Currently, the only adjacent improved right-of-way is County Road 50. Cain Road, to the east of the site is not improved. 78th Ave N is also not improved and would require access through an existing neighborhood road. The proposed access is currently the only current option for providing access to the outlot, which would require the smaller lot width. Accessory Structures: The lot size is intended to separate the residential portion of the farm from the agricultural portion. Increasing the lot size to allow the accessory structures would not maintain the integrity of the farm operation under the ownership of the Dahlheimers. Additionally, the detached accessory structures are an existing condition and the site will not physically change if the variance is granted. 2. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. Minimum Lot Size: This is a unique situation due to the desire to keep the agricultural operation while selling the residential portion of the farm. The 4.84-acre lot size generally follows that portion of the site that is not used as active farmland. Minimum Lot Width: Because the only improved access available is off County Road 50, this is a unique situation where the applicant must make a provision for that access. Accessory Structures: This is a unique situation due to the desire to separate the residential portion of the site, including accessory structures, from the agricultural portion of the site. This separation generally follows the borders of the farm field and wetlands. Because of these unique circumstances, the smaller lot contains accessory structures that exceed the maximum allowed accessory structure area. 3. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. For all variances: The granting of the variances will not alter the essential character of the locality. No physical changes are being made to the site. The variances do not change the site’s character and the lot will remain a rural farmstead until new development is proposed. 4. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. For all variances: The Urban Reserve district is intended to preserve agricultural uses where urban services are planned as shown on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, but not yet available. The proposed outlot preserves the agricultural use of the property. There is no new 7 Dahlheimer Farms (city file 18-041) February 28, 2019 development proposed for Lot 1. The agricultural nature of this property will not change, which is in harmony with the spirit of the ordinance. 5. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. For all variances: The variances to allow the subdivision as proposed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s vision for the transitioning a rural environment to a more urbanized land pattern for property guided Low Density Residential. The subdivision retains the agricultural use, while preserving the potential for future development once utilities are extended. Summary Staff finds that the proposed preliminary plat, final plat and variances are generally consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and Ordinance goals. Staff noted outstanding issues that must be addressed and have included conditions in the attached draft resolutions to address these issues. If the Council finds that the variance standards have not been met for the variances, they could recommend denial of the variances and provide findings of fact for denial 5. Action Move to approve the following: a. Resolution 2019-05 approving preliminary plat b. Resolution 2019-06 approving final plat c. Resolution 2019-07 approving variances Attachments 1. Resolution 2019-05 approving preliminary plat 2. Resolution 2019-06 approving final plat 3. Resolution 2019-07 approving variances 4. Site Map 5. Hennepin County Natural Resource Map 6. City Engineer memo dated January 29, 2019 7. Hennepin County Preliminary Plat Review Letter dated January 17, 2019 8. Existing Conditions Survey 9. Preliminary Plat 10. Final Plat City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-05 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR “DAHLHEIMER FARMS” FOR PETER AND JEAN DAHLHEIMER ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 20702 COUNTY ROAD 50 (PID 22-119-23-41- 0001) (CITY FILE NO. 18-041) WHEREAS, Peter and Jean Dahlheimer have requested approval of a preliminary plat to allow for the subdivision of the 39.94-acre property legally described as: East Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter, Section 22, Township 119, Range 23, Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record, if any. Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the submitted preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for preliminary plat subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to allow the creation of 1 lot for the existing single-family home and accessory structures, and one outlot in accordance with the plans received by the City on December 19, 2018, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval of the preliminary plat is contingent upon approval of the requested variances. 3. There are 3 development rights remaining on the proposed outlot and zero building rights remaining on Lot 1, Block 1. 4. No new development is proposed; therefore, no park dedication is required. Upon any proposed development or further subdivision of Outlot A, park dedication will be due as required by the subdivision ordinance. 5. The application shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated January 29, 2019. a. The plans must be revised to increase the width of Outlot A from 60 to 80 feet. 6. The application is subject to the review and approval by Hennepin County. The applicant shall comply with any conditions of approval from the letter from the County dated January 17, 2019. 7. The applicant shall not mow the wetland buffer area in accordance with Section 1050.10, Subd. 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-05 Page 2 of 3 8. The wetland delineation for Lot 1, Block 1 must be approved prior to release of the final plat for recording. The preliminary and final plat must reflect the approved delineation. 9. Prior to release of escrow: a. The applicant must record the approving resolutions, mylar and all related documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. b. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance prior to the release of escrow. i. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. ii. Wetland buffer signs must be installed at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of 200 feet of wetland edge as shown on the preliminary plat. iii. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. c. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plat drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. 10. Approval of the preliminary plat shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat. City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-05 Page 3 of 3 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-06 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR “DAHLHEIMER FARMS” FOR PETER AND JEAN DAHLHEIMER ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 20702 COUNTY ROAD 50 (PID 22-119-23-41- 0001) (CITY FILE NO. 18-041) WHEREAS, Peter and Jean Dahlheimer have requested approval of a final plat to allow for the subdivision of the 39.94-acre property legally described as: East Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter, Section 22, Township 119, Range 23, Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record, if any. Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the submitted preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and herby does approve the request for final plat subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A final plat is approved to allow the creation of 1 lot for the existing single-family home and accessory structures, and one outlot in accordance with the plans received by the City on December 19, 2018, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval of the final plat is contingent upon approval of the requested variances. 3. There are 3 development rights remaining on the proposed outlot and zero building rights remaining on Lot 1, Block 1. 4. No new development is proposed; therefore, no park dedication is required. Upon any proposed development or further subdivision of Outlot A, park dedication will be due as required by the subdivision ordinance. 5. The applicant must comply with all conditions of Preliminary Plat approval (Resolution 2019-05) 6. Prior to release of escrow: a. The applicant must record the approving resolutions, mylar and all related documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. b. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance prior to the release of escrow. i. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-06 Page 2 of 2 ii. Wetland buffer signs must be installed at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of 200 feet of wetland edge as shown on the preliminary plat. iii. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. c. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plat drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-07 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING VARIANCES FOR “DAHLHEIMER FARMS” FOR PETER AND JEAN DAHLHEIMER ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 20702 COUNTY ROAD 50 (PID 22-119-23-41- 0001) (CITY FILE NO. 18-041) WHEREAS, Peter and Jean Dahlheimer have requested approval of variances to allow for the subdivision of the 39.94-acre property legally described as: East Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter, Section 22, Township 119, Range 23, Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record, if any. Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the requested variances at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for variances subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. The variances are approved to allow the creation of 1 lot for the existing single-family home and accessory structures, and one outlot in accordance with the plans received by the City on December 19, 2018, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The following variances are approved: a. Variance from 1040.020, Subd. 9 of the Zoning Ordinance and to allow the proposed Lot 1, Block 1 to be platted as shown on the plans, which does not meet the minimum lot size based on the following findings: i. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The applicant intends to keep the outlot as farmland and sell Lot 1 as residential property. The size of Lot 1 generally follows the portion of the site that is not used as farm land and uses the wetlands present on-site as a natural border for the parcel. If the applicant followed the 20-acre minimum lot size, the residential property would have to include a portion of the farm land. This would prevent the sale of proposed Lot 1 as exclusively residential property and would not maintain the integrity of the farming operation under the ownership of the Dahlheimers. ii. The conditions are unique to the parcel of land and were not created by the owner. This is a unique situation due to the desire to keep the agricultural operation while selling the residential portion of the farm. The 4.84-acre lot size generally follows that portion of the site that is not used as active farmland. iii. The granting of the variances will not alter the essential character of the locality. No physical changes are being made to the site. The variances do City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-07 Page 2 of 4 not change the site’s character and the lot will remain a rural farmstead until new development is proposed. iv. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The Urban Reserve district is intended to preserve agricultural uses where urban services are planned as shown on the 2030 comprehensive plan, but not yet available. The proposed outlot preserves the agricultural use of the property. There is no new development proposed for Lot 1. The agricultural nature of this property will not change, which is in harmony with the spirit of the ordinance. v. The variances to allow the subdivision as proposed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s vision for the transitioning a rural environment to a more urbanized land pattern for property guided Low Density Residential. The subdivision retains the agricultural use, while preserving the potential for future development once utilities are extended. b. Variance from 1040.020, Subd. 9 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the proposed Outlot A to be platted as shown on the plans, which does not meet the minimum lot width and based on the following findings: i. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The proposed lot width is a result of the need for access to the outlot. Currently, the only adjacent improved right-of-way is County Road 50. Cain Road, to the east of the site is not improved. 78th Ave N is also not improved and would require access through an existing neighborhood road. The proposed access is currently the only viable option for providing access to the outlot, which would require the smaller lot width. ii. The conditions are unique to the parcel of land and were not created by the owner. Because the only improved access available is off County Road 50, this is a unique situation where the applicant must make a provision for that access. iii. The granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. No physical changes are being made to the site. The variances do not change the site’s character and the lot will remain a rural farmstead until new development is proposed. iv. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The Urban Reserve district is intended to preserve agricultural uses where urban services are planned as shown on the 2030 comprehensive plan, but not yet available. The proposed outlot preserves the agricultural use of the property. There is no new development proposed for Lot 1. The agricultural nature of this property will not change, which is in harmony with the spirit of the ordinance. v. The variances to allow the subdivision as proposed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s vision for the transitioning a rural environment to a more urbanized land pattern for property guided Low Density Residential. The subdivision retains the agricultural use, while preserving the potential for future development once utilities are extended. c. Variance from 1030.020, Subd. 4 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the proposed Lot 1, Block 1 to be platted as shown on the plans, which exceeds the allowed City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-07 Page 3 of 4 detached accessory structure area for a 4.84-acre lot based on the following findings: i. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The lot size is intended to separate the residential portion of the farm from the agricultural portion. Increasing the lot size to allow the accessory structures would not maintain the integrity of the farm operation under the ownership of the Dahlheimers. Additionally, the detached accessory structures are an existing condition and the site will not physically change if the variance is granted. ii. The conditions are unique to the parcel of land and were not created by the owner. This is a unique situation due to the desire to separate the residential portion of the site, including accessory structures, from the agricultural portion of the site. This separation generally follows the borders of the farm field and wetlands. Because of these unique circumstances, the smaller lot contains accessory structures that exceed the maximum allowed accessory structure area. iii. The granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. No physical changes are being made to the site. The variances do not change the site’s character and the lot will remain a rural farmstead until new development is proposed. iv. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The Urban Reserve district is intended to preserve agricultural uses where urban services are planned as shown on the 2030 comprehensive plan, but not yet available. The proposed outlot preserves the agricultural use of the property. There is no new development proposed for Lot 1. The agricultural nature of this property will not change, which is in harmony with the spirit of the ordinance. v. The variances to allow the subdivision as proposed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s vision for the transitioning a rural environment to a more urbanized land pattern for property guided Low Density Residential. The subdivision retains the agricultural use, while preserving the potential for future development once utilities are extended. 3. The applicant/landowner must record the approving resolution with Hennepin County and provide proof or recording to the City. 4. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use. City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-07 Page 4 of 4 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Henn e p in Co unty Prop erty Map Da te : 1/4/2019 Com ments: 1 inc h = 8 00 feet PAR C EL ID: 22 11923410001 OWN ER N AME : P A & J F Dahlheimer PAR C EL AD DR E SS: 2 070 2 Co R d N o 50, Corcoran MN 55340 PAR C EL AR EA: 40 .2 ac re s, 1,751,055 sq ft A-T-B: Ab s trac t SAL E PR ICE: $135,000 SAL E D ATA: 07/1997 SAL E C OD E: Exclu de d From Ratio Studies ASSESS ED 2 017 , PAYABLE 2018 PR OPERT Y TYPE: Farm H OM ESTEAD : Homes tead M AR KET VA L UE: $387,300 TAX TO TAL: $3,122.02 ASSESS ED 2 018 , PAYABLE 2019 PRO PER TY TYPE : Farm HO MESTEAD: Homestead MARKE T VALU E: $391,000 This dat a (i) is fur nished 'AS IS' wit h no repres ent at ion as to com pletenes s or acc ura cy; (ii) is furnis hed with no war rant y of an y k ind; an d (i ii) is not s uit able for lega l, engi neering or s urv ey ing purposes . Hen nepin C ounty s hall not be liable f or any dam age, in jury o r los s r esu lting f rom t his data. CO PYRIG HT © HENNEPIN CO UN TY 2 0 19 He nn e pin Cou n ty Na tural Resources Map Da te : 1/4/2019 Co mm ents: Th is data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to co mp le te ness or accu racy; (ii) is furnished with no wa rra nty of a ny kin d; an d (iii) is n otsuitable for leg al, eng ine erin g or surveying p urposes. Hennepin County shall n ot be liable for a ny d amage, injury or loss re sulting from this data. CO PYRIGHT © HENNEP IN COUNTY 2019 1 inch = 8 00 feet Le ge nd FEM A Floodp lai ns - 100 Ye ar A AE FL OODPLAIN AH AO AE FL OODW AY We tlands Poten tial Wetland - HCW I Pr obab le We tland - HCW I Pr obab le We tland - NW I PID: 2 211 9 234 1 000 1 Add re s s: 2 0702 CO RD NO 50, C OR C ORAN O wne r N am e: P A & J F D AHLHEIM ER Acr es: 40.2 ¯ Technical Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - ENGINEER’S MEMO To: Kendra Lindahl, AICP, City Planner From: Kent Torve, P.E., City Engineer Date: January 29, 2019 Subject: Dahlheimer Farms 1. Existing Conditions The Dahlheimer Farms parcel is west of the Corcoran Trail development (legally described as the west edge of the Corcoran Estates and Corcoran Estates Second Addition plats). The development will create a lot for the original homestead and an Outlot which could potentially be further developed. A half ROW for future Cain Road exists on the west border of Corcoran Estates/Corcoran Estates Second Addition. A ROW currently exists within Corcoran Estates for 78th Ave. N. 2. Lot 1 Block 1 The west boundary of Lot 1 shall be moved east to provide an access 80 feet in width (currently shown as 60 feet). 2. Outlot Upon development of the Outlot it is recommended; Obtain a 40-foot half ROW along east boundary for Cain Road extension unless other connections and other approved extensions are provided Dedicate ROW for a connection to 78th Avenue North within Corcoran Estates for street and utilities. Provide a street and utility connection and ROW to the property to the west (Eagle Ridge Outlot A) Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55430 hennepin.us Mr. Mike Pritchard January 17, 2019 Code Compliance Official City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Re: Preliminary Plat Review – Dahlheimer Farms (Received 12/28/18) 20702 County Road 50 Hennepin County Plat Review ID #3739 (Reviewed 01/08/19) Subdivides 40 acre farmstead into a 5 acre single family lots, 35 acres remaining in active farming use Dear Mr. Pritchard: Please consider the following in your review of this proposal: Access Proposes to retain easterly gravel driveway access to the homestead while adding a farm field access on the westerly edge of the property (approximately 500 feet to the west). Comments Our first preference would be to consolidate a single driveway access along County Road 50 to serve both of the subdividing properties. If that is not considered reasonable at this time, in the future we will be seeking access consolidation upon any further subdivision or development of the farm field property. Contact Michael Olmstead, Permits Coordinator - 612-596-0336, michael.olmstead@hennepin.us. Right-of-Way Comment(s) We envision this section of County Road 50 to remain as a two-lane roadway with rural ditch drainage for the foreseeable future. To be consistent with the 50 foot half right-of-way previously obtained along the property to the west, we request a 17 foot dedication of right- of-way or highway easement. Permits Requirements Please inform the developer that all construction within county right-of-way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact Michael Olmstead, Permits Coordinator - 612-596-0336, michael.olmstead@hennepin.us. Minnesota Statutes 505.03, 505.021, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. More information Please contact us for any further discussion of these items. • Bob Byers at 612-596-0354, robert.byers@hennepin.us • Jason Gottfried at 612-596-0394, jason.gottfried@hennepin.us Sincerely, Robert H. Byers Robert Byers, PE Principal Professional Engineer, Transportation Planning CC: Michael Olmstead, Permits Coordinator AgendaItem 7g. CouncilMeetingDate: 2/28/2019 FINANCIALCLAIMS PreparedBy: jrotz CHECKRANGE FUND #500ESCROWCLAIMSAgendaItem: 7a. Paid toAmountProject name 500-20467$2,405.65CORCORANLANDLLC - Corcoran Land RZ/CUP/SP 18-038 500-20436$779.25LANDFORM-PULTEENCORE FINALPUDAND FP 18-027 500-20465$33.00LANDFORM-RAVINIA10THFPAND PUD 18-034 500-20466$2,087.00LANDFORM-DAHLHEIMERPP, FP, ANDVARIANCE 18-041 500-20456$463.75LANDFORM-KARINIEMI PP/WILLOW LLC 18-037 500-20467$134.25LANDFORM-CORCORAN LANDRZ/CUP/SP18-038 500-20469$1,851.50LANDFORM-RAVINIA 11THRZ/PP, PUD 18-040 500-20403$842.25LENNAR - Lennar-SchwalbeComp PlanAmen 500-20413$2,029.49LENNAR - Ravinia8thFPandPUD 500-20421$323.49LENNAR - Ravinia7thAddit - FP17-013 500-20445$3,114.98LENNAR - Ravinia 9thFP andPUD17-042 500-20390$518.45WRIGHTHENNEPINCOOP ELECT - RaviniaStreetLights 500-20420$192.01WRIGHT HENNEPINCOOP ELECT - Bass LakeCrossing MIHome17-012 500-20376$164.94WENCK - PARKPLACESTORAGE 500-20423$2,082.00WENCK - BassLakeEstatesSketch PUD17-015 500-20436$4,692.62WENCK - PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029 500-20438$1,096.04WENCK - BassLake CrossingM/I Home17-012Engineering 500-20466$171.60WENCK - DahlheimerWetlandWaiv18-036 500-20335$15,383.36WENCK - LENNAR - ENGINEERING 500-20335$1,909.00WENCK - Wessel PropertyFeasibility Study Total 40,274.63 TotalFund #500 = 40,274.63 SeeattachedPayments Detail) ALLOTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMSAgendaItem:7b.$ 151,060.36$ 191,334.99TotalChecks Seeattached Check DetailRegister) TotalofAutoDeductions 92,016.15 TOTALEXPENDITURES FORAPPROVAL$ 283,351.14 AutoDeductions / ElectronicFundTransfer / OtherDisbursements DatePaid toAmount 2/14/2019SQU*SQ *CREATIVE INSTIGOSQ.COMCO$ 103.00 2/15/20194IMPRINT$ 1,013.59 2/19/2019MSFT MSBILL.INFOWA$ 77.42 2/19/2019Paypal USPCA$ 60.00 2/19/2019Paypal USPCA$ 120.00 2/19/2019Martini AutoParts LLC - Avon, MN$ 200.00 2/19/2019Long HotSummer$ 259.00 2/19/2019Samsclub.com 888-746-7726AR$ 274.38 2/19/20194IMPRINT$ 893.90 2/21/2019Amazon.com$ 23.99 2/22/2019Holiday Station - MapleGrove, MN$ 18.34 2/15/2019ADPWageGarnishment$ 531.14 2/15/2019Payroll Taxes$ 18,150.36 2/15/2019NetPayrollPP04$ 49,384.91 2/19/2019ADP WAGE PAY, WAGE PAY$ 2.17 2/19/2019ADPTax, ADP Tax$ 20.65 2/20/2019PERA$ 13,255.17 2/21/2019State ofMN - MSRS$ 2,071.24 2/21/2019StateofMN - Roth$ 2,641.63 2/21/2019Optum - HSA$ 2,915.26 Total H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\CouncilClaims\\2019ClaimsWorkbook.xls 02/22/199:05AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 1 Check DetailRegister© February 2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment 10100 FarmersState Bank Unpaid ADAMS PESTCONTROL, INC. E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$84.272748291PEST CONTROL Total ADAMS PESTCONTROL, INC. 84.27 Unpaid ADP, LLC E100-41941-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$257.75530350201WORKFORCENOWPAYROLL SOLUTIONS BUNDLE IMPLEMENTATIONCHARGES Total ADP, LLC 257.75 Unpaid AMAZONCAPITALSERVICES E207-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$16.0419R3-3DT6-6YTRUCK SAFETYSUPPLIES E100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$31.9519R3-3DT6-QAPCUPSBATTERYREPLACEMENT E207-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$121.261K1V-HHCT-3TRUCK SAFETY SUPPLIES Total AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 169.25 Unpaid BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY E100-43100-212 MotorFuels$1,183.52875884DIESEL E100-42100-212 Motor Fuels$975.28875885SQUAD FUEL E100-43100-212 Motor Fuels$21.29875885GASOLINE E100-41920-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$34.68875885GASOLINE Total BEAUDRYOILCOMPANY 2,214.77 Unpaid BEISE, JESSICA E100-41400-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$14.38022019MILEAGE G100-21709 DependentCareFSAWithhold$450.00022019DEPENDENT CARE Total BEISE, JESSICA 464.38 Unpaid CARDIACSCIENCECORP E416-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$12,190.007346780DEFIBRILLATIONMACHINES Total CARDIAC SCIENCE CORP 12,190.00 Unpaid CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$311.848000014143-4 NATURALGAS - 5754177-3 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$38.378000014143-4 NATURALGAS - 5754460-3 E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$0.008000014143-4 NATURAL GAS-9100 Total CENTERPOINT ENERGYHOUSTON 350.21 Unpaid CINTAS - 470 E100-43100-417 Uniforms$41.984016599952PW UNIFORMS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$85.184016599979CITYHALLRUGS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$49.944016599994PW RUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.504016600014CITY HALLRUGS E100-42100-223 BuildingRepairSupplies$64.834016600035PD RUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$114.814016600054PW UNIFORMS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$41.984016938502PW UNIFORMS E100-42100-223 Building RepairSupplies$64.834016938550PD RUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$85.184016938556CITYHALLRUGS 02/22/199:05AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 2 Check DetailRegister© February 2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.504016938590CITYHALLRUGS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$94.614016938598PW RUGS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$93.614016938607PUBLIC WORKS TOWELS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$114.814016938656PW UNIFORMS Total CINTAS - 470 1,016.76 Unpaid COMCAST-INTERNET E100-41941-321 Telephone$72.42021219CITY HALLINTERNET E100-42100-321 Telephone$72.43021219PD INTERNET Total COMCAST-INTERNET 144.85 Unpaid COMPUTER INTEGRATIONTECH E100-41951-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$840.00273844IT MANAGEDSERVICE - MONTHLY E100-41951-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$595.00273925IT MANAGEDSERVICE - MONTHLY E100-41951-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$1,155.00273942ITMANAGED SERVICE - MONTHLY E100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$1,152.00274135IT MANAGEDSERVICE - MONTHLY Total COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH 3,742.00 Unpaid CORCORANLAND LLC R100-41900-34103 Zoning/LandUseApplFee$1,465.00REFUNDESCROW/ZONINGLAND USEAPPFEEREFUND G500-20467 CorcoranLandRZ/CUP/SP18-038$2,405.65REFUNDESCROW/ZONINGLAND USEAPPFEEREFUND Total CORCORAN LAND LLC 3,870.65 Unpaid DELTADENTAL E100-41400-131 Employer PaidHealth$132.057566737DENTAL INSURANCE E100-42100-131 Employer PaidHealth$122.807566737DENTAL INSURANCE E100-42102-131 EmployerPaidHealth$0.007566737DENTAL INSURANCE E100-43100-131 EmployerPaidHealth$124.407566737DENTAL INSURANCE G100-20205 Reimbursements$63.007566737DENTAL INSURANCE - HAMILTON Total DELTA DENTAL 442.25 Unpaid DVS E100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$288.00F213C0305VEHICLEREGISTRATION - PD5301 Total DVS 288.00 Unpaid ELMCREEK WATERSHED MGMTCOMM E100-41900-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$654.81246RECOVERY EXPENSE Total ELMCREEK WATERSHED MGMT COMM 654.81 Unpaid EVOLVINGSOLUTIONSINC E100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$1,350.00101050IT MANAGED SERVICE - MONTHLYJANUARY 2019 Total EVOLVING SOLUTIONSINC 1,350.00 Unpaid FERGUSONWATERWORKS E601-49400-215 Water Meters$2,972.700316280METERS Total FERGUSONWATERWORKS 2,972.70 Unpaid HEALTHPARTNERS E100-41300-131 Employer PaidHealth$410.8287622571HEALTH PARTNERS 3/19 INVOICE 02/22/199:05AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 3 Check DetailRegister© February 2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment E100-41400-131 Employer PaidHealth$2,448.8387622571HEALTH PARTNERS 3/19INVOICE E100-42100-131 Employer PaidHealth$8,271.8887622571HEALTH PARTNERS 3/19INVOICE E100-42102-131 Employer PaidHealth$677.1387622571HEALTH PARTNERS 3/19 INVOICE E100-43100-131 EmployerPaidHealth$5,497.1587622571HEALTH PARTNERS 3/19INVOICE G100-20205 Reimbursements$1,619.9087622571HEALTH PARTNERS 3/19 INVOICE - HAMILTON G100-20205 Reimbursements$1,987.9787622571HEALTH PARTNERS 3/19 INVOICE - SCHUTTE Total HEALTHPARTNERS 20,913.68 Unpaid HENN COSHERIFF-MC129 E100-42100-301 Prisoner$335.001000123056PRISONER FEES - BOOKING/HOUSING Total HENNCOSHERIFF-MC129 335.00 Unpaid JOEROTZ E100-41400-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$0.87022119MILEAGE E100-41400-208 TrainingandInstruction$639.77022119TRAINING E100-41400-433 DuesandMemberships$310.00022119MNCPA MEMBERSHIP 2019 Total JOEROTZ 950.64 Unpaid LANDFORM E101-41911-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$5,069.2528717SE DISTRICT PLANANDGUIDELINESUPDATE 18-012 E100-41910-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$1,374.0028717DEVELOPMENT RIGHT ANDOS&PORDINANCE UPDATE 18-014 G500-20436 PulteEncore - PUDSkch 17-029$779.2528717PULTE ENCORE FINALPUD AND FP18-027 G500-20465 Ravinia 10thFP & PUD18-034$33.0028717RAVINIA10TH FPAND PUD 18-034 G500-20466 Dahlheimer Wetland Waiv18-036$2,087.0028717DAHLHEIMER PP, FP, ANDVARIANCE 18-041 G500-20456 WillowLLCMinorSubd18-022$463.7528717KARINIEMI PP/WILLOWLLC 18-037 G500-20467 CorcoranLandRZ/CUP/SP18-038$134.2528717CORCORANLAND RZ/CUP/SP18-038 G500-20469 Ravinia11thRZ/PP, PUD18-040$1,851.5028717RAVINIA11TH RZ/PP, PUD18-040 E100-41910-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$6,915.5028718CORCORAN PLANNING E100-41910-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$200.0028718CITY MEETINGS E100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$1,362.7528720ORDINANCE AMENDMENT BEESANDCHICKENS 17- 038 E101-41911-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$2,330.2528720CORCORAN2040COMPREHENSIVE 17-001 Total LANDFORM 22,600.50 Unpaid LENNAR G500-20403 Lennar-Schwalbe CompPlanAmen$842.25ESCROW REFESCROW REFUND G500-20413 Ravinia 8thFPandPUD$2,029.49ESCROW REFESCROW REFUND G500-20421 Ravinia7thAddit - FP17-013$323.49ESCROW REFESCROWREFUND G500-20445 Ravinia9thFPandPUD17-042$3,114.98ESCROW REFESCROW REFUND Total LENNAR 6,310.21 Unpaid METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES E100-42400-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$18,703.481860FINALIZED INSPECTIONS Total METROWESTINSPECTIONSERVICES 18,703.48 Unpaid NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT E100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$306.094582839PPARTS/LABOR - KENMACK E100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$132.204582930PPARTS/LABOR - 12MACK 02/22/199:05AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 4 Check DetailRegister© February 2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment Total NUSSTRUCK & EQUIPMENT 438.29 Unpaid PATNODE ELECTRIC E100-42100-223 BuildingRepairSupplies$100.002087PD HEATER FANMAINTENANCE Total PATNODEELECTRIC 100.00 Unpaid PLEAA E100-42100-433 DuesandMemberships$35.002019 DUESSTEELMAN - 2019DUES Total PLEAA 35.00 Unpaid SUNLIFEFINANCIAL E100-41300-131 EmployerPaidHealth$88.55237687-2019-0EMPLOYER PAIDHEALTH E100-41400-131 EmployerPaidHealth$146.29237687-2019-0EMPLOYER PAIDHEALTH E100-41920-131 EmployerPaidHealth$72.20237687-2019-0EMPLOYER PAIDHEALTH E100-42100-131 EmployerPaidHealth$1,020.04237687-2019-0EMPLOYER PAIDHEALTH E100-43100-131 Employer PaidHealth$449.72237687-2019-0EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH E100-42102-131 Employer PaidHealth$94.24237687-2019-0EMPLOYERPAID HEALTH Total SUNLIFEFINANCIAL 1,871.04 Unpaid TEGRETE E100-41941-400 Repairs & MaintCont (GENERAL$365.0080983MONTHLY CITYHALL CLEANING Total TEGRETE 365.00 Unpaid TOTALPRINTINGSERVICES E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$225.0012310SUPPLIES Total TOTAL PRINTING SERVICES 225.00 Unpaid TRI-COUNTY LAWENFORCEMENT E100-42100-433 DuesandMemberships$75.002019DUES2019 ANNUAL DUES Total TRI-COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT 75.00 Unpaid WENCKASSOCIATES, INC. G500-20376 ParkPlace Storage$164.94020819PARK PLACE STORAGE G500-20423 BassLakeEstSkch PUD17-015$2,082.00020819Bass LakeEstates SketchPUD17-015 G500-20436 PulteEncore - PUDSkch 17-029$4,692.62020819Pulte Encore - PUDSkch17-029 G500-20438 BassLkCR M/IHomeEngineering$1,096.04020819Bass LakeCrossing M/IHome 17-012Engineering G500-20466 Dahlheimer WetlandWaiv18-036$171.60020819Dahlheimer Wetland Waiv 18-036 E100-43170-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$3,670.50020819General EngServices E100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$2,250.20020819StormWater - Engineering E101-41911-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$10,614.400208192040CORCORAN COMP PLAN E101-41911-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$3,327.50020819SEDistrictPlan andGuidelines Update 18-012 E424-43100-530 ImprovementsOtherThanBldgs$58.80020819Bass LakeCrossingM/IHome 17-012CR10 TURN LANES E425-49450-530 ImprovementsOtherThanBldgs$10,471.20020819Pulte Encore - NETrunkSewer E425-43100-530 ImprovementsOtherThanBldgs$9,339.50020819Pulte Encore - TurnLanesCSAH101andEncore E427-43100-530 ImprovementsOtherThan Bldgs$6,023.5002081966th Street Design andConstruction E427-43100-530 ImprovementsOtherThan Bldgs$1,670.70020819CSAH 116andGleason Parkway TurnLanes E601-49400-303 EngineeringFees$5,135.30020819Water - Engineering/NEWaterSupply E602-49450-303 Engineering Fees$812.20020819Sanitary Sewer - Engineering 02/22/199:05AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 5 Check DetailRegister© February 2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment E602-49450-303 EngineeringFees$468.82020819MCES SEWEREXTENSION E601-49400-303 EngineeringFees$6,099.850208192019 TrunkWater MainImprovements G500-20335 LennarEng PlanReview/Modific$15,383.36020819LENNAR - ENGINEERING G500-20335 Lennar Eng PlanReview/Modific$1,909.00020819Wessel Property FeasibilityStudy Total WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 85,442.03 Unpaid WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOPELECT E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$56.91021319CTY RD10/116 000-0100-1469 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$213.48021319Ballpark: 120-1246-7200 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$12.95021319BASEBALL FIELDS/IRRIGATION: 150-1693-6855 E100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$13.06021319CIVIL DEFENSE: 120-1246-8000 E100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$13.06021319MapleHill Est: 120-1246-8100 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$24.00021319School Property: 120-1247-9600 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$1,099.880213198200 CtyRd 116: 120-1255-6300 E100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$0.000213196510 CtyRd116: 150-1680-4662 E601-49400-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$13.7802131919090 BassLkRd:150-1687-7510 E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$34.630213199525 CainRd: 150-1689-5230 E602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$215.35021319BrocktonLn: 150-1689-6871 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$41.630213198200 COUNTYRD116/DISPLAY: 150-1693-6612 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$9.87021319Cty 10/MapleHi: 120-1246-7300 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$20.63021319CTY 10/Treptaus: 120-1246-7400 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$18.20021319CTY 10/StThomas:120-1246-7500 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$20.63021319Cty 10/Stanchion:120-1246-7600 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$20.63021319Co Rd10 & 50: 120-1246-7700 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$10.450213198200 CtyRd116: 120-1246-7800 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$9.8702131975th Ave/Hwy 116:120-1246-7900 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$0.000213198200 CtyRd116: 150-1684-2033 E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$27.950213199100 CtyRd19: 150-1688-8463 E602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$107.7502131920120 CTY10LIF:150-1691-6661 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$15.35021319Bridle/Gleason: 150-1690-5131 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35021319Bridle/Paddock: 150-1690-5135 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.77021319Paddock Ln150-1690-5137 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35021319Bridle Path: 150-1690-5146 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$15.35021319Paddock/Bridle: 150-1690-5158 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$15.350213196471 Carriage: 150-1691-0155 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$15.35021319Bridle/Steeple: 150-1691-0158 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$15.35021319Bridle/Bluestem: 150-1691-0168 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35021319Prairie/Bridle: 150-1691-0174 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35021319Bridle Path: 150-1691-0177 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$15.35021319ElderberryCt: 150-1691-0178 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7702131966TH/CEDAR: 150-1692-8373 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.77021319Bridle/66thAve: 150-1692-8374 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$0.000213196629 CTY101: 150-1691-8062 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7702131919301 Annabelle: 150-1691-8063 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.770213196675 Carriage: 150-1691-8064 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.770213196681 Bridle: 150-1691-8066 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.770213196657 Bridle: 150-1691-8079 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7702131919130 Galloway: 150-1691-8080 02/22/199:05AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 6 Check DetailRegister© February 2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.7702131919065 Galloway: 150-1691-8082 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$30.120213196485 Larkspur: 150-1692-0907 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.770213196398 Larkspur: 150-1692-0908 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7702131919437 LupineLN: 150-1693-0197 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7702131919389 LupineLN: 150-1693-0199 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7702131919345 GoldenTR: 150-1693-0200 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.770213196310 Steeple LN: 150-1693-0201 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.770213196370 SteepleLN: 150-1693-0202 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.7702131919367 Annabelle: 150-1693-5724 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.7702131919343 Annabelle: 150-1693-5726 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7702131919315Primrose: 150-1693-5731 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.7702131919399Primrose: 150-1693-5732 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$9.89021319ANNABELLE LN/LOT5: 150-1694-0821 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.77021319Primrose/Wildfl: 150-1693-5733 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$14.77021319Wildflo/Gleason: 150-1693-5734 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$14.77021319Gleason/Wildflo: 150-1693-5986 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.77021319FIRLN/75THAVE: 150-1693-7072 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.77021319FIRLNN: 150-1693-7074 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.77021319FIR LN/74TH AVE: 150-1693-7075 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$23.50021319FIR LNN/CR10: 150-1693-7076 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$14.7702131974TH AVEN: 150-1693-7077 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$0.000213198200CR116/SIGN: 150-1693-6612 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$29.84021319FIR LNN/CR10: 150-1694-0076 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$18.75021319FIRLNN: 150-1694-0078 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$15.21021319FIR LN N/LOT #8: 150-1694-0079 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$15.21021319FIR LNN/72ND N: 150-1694-0080 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$15.2102131972ND AVEN: 150-1694-0081 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$15.21021319FIR LN N/LOT #5: 150-1694-0082 Total WRIGHTHENNEPINCOOPELECT 2,695.17 Unpaid XCELENERGY E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$35.63625061914STREET LIGHTING9525CAINROAD E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$26.67625340297STREET LIGHTING CR19/CR30 Total XCEL ENERGY 62.30 10100 Farmers StateBank$191,334.99 02/22/199:05AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 7 Check DetailRegister© February 2019 Check AmtInvoiceComment FundSummary 10100 Farmers State Bank 100GENERALFUND$74,002.21 101LONG-TERMPLANNING FUND$21,341.40 207TRUCK SAFETY$137.30 416CAPITAL-EQUIPMENT CERTS$12,190.00 424CSAH-10FIRLANE TURNLANE$58.80 425 PULTEENCORE/BELLWETHERPROJEC$19,810.70 427 GLEASON/66THPARKWAY EXTENSION$7,694.20 500ESCROWHOLDING FUND$40,274.63 601WATER$14,221.63 602SEWER$1,604.12 191,334.99 CityofCorcoran ConsultantSummary 2/28/2019 NameInvoice DateAmountDue Carson, Clelland & Schreder Landform02/12/19 22,600.50 MetroWestInspection02/01/19 18,703.48 WenckAssociates02/08/19$ 85,442.03 Total$ 126,746.01 H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\Council Claims\\2019ClaimsWorkbook.xls v.m:Landforin J CITY OF CORCORAN or:2-12-19 PAYMENT VOUCHER MIN..:Lendimm Sine 513 Payment Tow: $ 22,600.50 105 Sant FAN Ave Mi neapofe,MN 55401 NM MOM 03,14/19 . Funk O.p.On.O Mccaum 0aan1P0en Imams Amount 100 41910 300 Corcoran Planning 28718 $ 6,915.50 ' 100 41910 300 City Meetings 28718 ,$ 200.00 100 41910 300 Annual Codification 100 41910 300 Tree Preservationiatural Protection Oct.18-010 101 41911 300 SE District Plan and Guidelines Update 18-012 28717 $ 5,069.25 , 100 41910 300 1 Nuisance Ordinance Update 18-013 100 41910 300 I Development Right and OS&P Ord.Update 18-014 28717 $ 1,374.00 100 41910 300 I Minor Subdivision Amendment 18-021 100 41910 300 Financial Guarantee Ordinance Amendment 18-025 100 41910 300 Kottke Development Rights Appeal 18-032 100 41910 300 Schulte Initiate Ag Preserve Expiration 17-041 100 41910 300 Ordinance Amendment Dog Kennels 17-037 100 41910 300 Ordinance Amendment Bees and Chickens 17-038 28720 $ 1,362.75 ' 100 41910 300 Ordinance Amendment Small Cells&DAS 17-039 100 41910 300 Sign Ordinance-Dynamic Sign 17-033 100 41910 300 Mayers Ag Preserve 17-019 101 41911 300 CORCORAN 2040 COMPREHENSIVE 17-001 28720 5 2,330.25 100 41910 300 SOLAR GARDEN MORATORIUM 17-018 100 41910 300 HENNEPIN COUNTY WEATHER STATION 500 20376 PARK PLACE STORAGE 16-027 i 500 20376 PARK PLACE STORAGE 17-034 500 20389 STREHLER ESTATES 16-001 I 500 20392 MN SOLAR IUP 16-032 500 20396 RAVINIA 4TH 16-004 500 20400 RAVINIA 8TH 16-016 500 20400 RAVINIA 5TH 16-015 500 20404 LENNAR SCHWALBE PUD 500 20406 RAVINIA 7TH PUD 16-030 500 20407 MOTOR CAFE PUD 16-033 500 20411 SUNRISE SOLAR 17-003 500 20413 RAVINIA 8TH FP AND PUD 17-002 500 20415 M-1 Homes Sketch 17.006 500 20416 Sunrise Solar-17.007 500 20418 Pheasant Ridge 17-009 500 20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 500 20421 Ravinia 7th Addit-FP 17-013 500 20421 Ravinia 7th and 9th Lot Une Adjustment 18-019 500 20421 Ravinia 7th Easement Vacation 18-023 500 20422 Motley Lot Line Adjust 17-014 500 20423 Bass Lake Est Skch PUD 17-015 500 20424 Schilling Administrative Permit 17-016 500 20425 Gmach Farms Preliminary&Final Plat 17-017 500 20429 Good Dog MN IUP/CHOL 17-021 500 20430 Bass Lake Crossing FP,FPUD and DA 17-022 500 20430 Bass Lake Crossing 2nd FP,FPUD 18-035 500 20431 Bass Lk Cross Lot Adj,17-023 500 20432 HALES CORNER 2ND ADD.17-025 500 20433 BASS LAKE EST CPA,PP,RZ PUD 17-024 500 20434 HOPPE LOT COMBO 17-027 500 20435 Red Bam Pet Ret.-CUP 17-028 500 20438 PULTE SKETCH PLAN 17-029 500 20438 Puite Encore EAW and Sketch plan 18-004 500 20436 Puts Comp Plan Amendment 18-007 i 500 20436 Puite Encore PP,PUD and RZ 18-016 500 20436 Puts Encore Final PUD and FP 18-027 28717 $ 779.25 500 20440 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 17-032 _ 500 20443 Pheasant Acres SPA 17-035 500 20442 BASS LAKE EST.FP,PUD 17-036 500 20444 SAC Wireless-Sprint 17-040 500 20445 Ravinia 9th FP and PUD 17-042 1 500 20446 Rush Creek Run PP 18-001 500 20449 Hunter Lot Vacation and Variance 18-002 500 20447 Pheasant Ridge 2nd Addition Sketch Plan 18-003 500 20447 Pheasant Ridge 2nd Addition RZ,PP,PUD 18-029 500 20448 Maple Hill Apt PUD Skch 18-005 500 20450 High 5 Companies CUP 18.006 500 20451 Doboszenski Sons Inc 18-008 500 20452 Matter Home Occupation 18-009 500 20453 Fehn Meadows 2nd Addition PP 18-017 150020453RefugeatRushCreekFinalPUDandFP18-028 500 20454 Edgewater Corcoran Skch 18-018 500 20455 Shoulak Ordinance Amend 18-020 500 20458 Willow LLC Minor Subd 18-022 500 20458 Rush Creek Run FP 18-026 500 20459 Refuge of Rush Creek FP 18-028 500 20460 Pheasant Ridge 2nd PP 18-029 500 20461 Pouliot Lot Une Adjust.18-030 500 20462 Maghrak Lot Combo&Var 18-031 ~ 500 20465 Ravinia 10th FP&PUD 18-034 28717 8 33.00 500 20466 Dahlheimer Wetland Waiver 18-036 500 20466 ( Dahlheimer PP,FP,and Variance 18-041 28717 $ 2,087 00 500 20456 ( Kariniemi PP/Willow LLC 18-037 28717 $ 463.75 500 20467 Corcoran Land RZ/CUP/SP 18-038 28717 $ 134.25 I50020488MeyerLotLineAdjustment18-039 1 500 20469 1 Ravinia 11th RZ/PP,PUD 18-040 28717 $ 1,851.50 I TOTAL: $ 22,600.50 Appov.0 Noon Cheeks ilil CO\ 33°3r L A N D F O R M From Site to Finish reEEVIZI 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612-252-9070 Suite 513 Fax: 612-252-9077 City of Corcoran n Minneapolis,MN 55401 Web: Iandform.net FEB8200CountyRoad116 1 2 20 1 9 Corcoran,MN 55340 BY: INVOICE No.28718 02/08/2019 Corcoran Planning Services COR19019.GEN Contract/PO#: For Services Rendered Through 1/31/2019 90-City Business Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S. 39.75 132.00 $5,247.00 Mansolf,JP A. 23.50 71.00 $1,668.50 Total Professional Services for.90 6,915.50 Total Charges for.90 1 043 9 i oapp $6,915.50 MTG-City Meetings Professional Services Employee Amount Lindahl,Kendra S. 200.00 Total Professional Services for MTG 200.00 Total Charges for MTG 1(10-1111)t)-360 -200.00 Invoice Amount 7,115.50 Please remit to: Landform, 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Please include invoice number on remittance. Page 1 of 1 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:28718 Invoice Date:2/8/2019 Transaction ID:13204 Labor Transactions P/E Date Employee Labor Code Work Date Hrs Effort COR19019.GEN..90 City Business 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/2/2019 7.00 924.00 office hours 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/3/2019 0.50 66.00 zoning calls/updated checklists,apps and guides for Mike 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/4/2019 0.50 66.00 PC minutes/PH notices 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/5/2019 4.00 528.00 Plymouth,Independence and Rogers 2040 Comp Plans,Maple Grove Apt plan review. 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/7/2019 0.50 66.00 DRC agenda/calls 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/8/2019 1.00 132.00 zoning calls and emails 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/9/2019 6.25 825.00 office hours 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/11/2019 1.00 132.00 adjacent cities comp plan letters/zoning calls 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/14/2019 1.50 198.00 DRC/project planning update/comp plan CC cover letters 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/28/2019 0.50 66.00 DRC agenda/PC agenda 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/30/2019 3.25 429.00 office hours 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/16/2019 5.00 660.00 office hours-misc.meetings/emails/phone calls 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/17/2019 0.50 66.00 calls/emails 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/18/2019 0.25 33.00 send requested materials to mike 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/21/2019 0.50 66.00 DRC agenda 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/22/2019 1.00 132.00 zoning calls and emails.SE corcoran calls from Ebert and Streeter 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/23/2019 6.50 858.00 • office hours 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/22/2019 2.75 195.25 City Officials guidebook/Planning Commission Training Powerpoint 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/23/2019 4.00 284.00 City Officials guidebook/Planning Commission Training Powerpoint 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/24/2019 5.50 390.50 Planning Commission Training Powerpoint 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/28/2019 2.25 159.75 Code Enforcement background research 2/8/2019 7:55:23 AM 1 of 2 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:28718 Invoice Date:2/8/2019 Transaction ID: 13204 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/31/2019 3.25 230.75 Placeholder for Ordinance Update 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/3/2019 5.75 408.25 Form Updates Total for COR19019.GEN..90 63.25 6,915.50 COR19019.GEN.MTG City Meetings 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/24/2019 1.00 100.00 Work session and council meeting 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/3/2019 1.00 100.00 PC meeting and pre-meeting with Chair Total for COR19019.GEN.MTG 2.00 200.00 Total labor 65.25 7,115.50 2/8/2019 7:55:23 AM 2 of 2 L A N D F O R M From Site to Finish refEEVZI FEB 1 2 g 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612-252-9070 Suite 513 Fax: 612-252-9077 City of Corcoran Minneapolis,MN 55401 Web: landform.net 8200 County Road 116 BY.------------- Corcoran,MN 55340 INVOICE No.28717 02/08/2019 Corcoran Planning Services COR18016.GEN Contract/P0#: For Services Rendered Through 1/31/2019 012-SE District Plan and Guidelines Update(city file 18-012) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S. 4.50 132.00 594.00 Osthus,Emily T. 55.25 81.00 $4,475.25 Total Professional Services for.012 5,069.25 Total Charges for.012 0'_14)1 11-30U 5,069.25 014-Development Right and OS&P Ordinance Update(city file 18-014) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S. 5.50 132.00 726.00 Shay,Kevin M. 8.00 81.00 648.00 Total Professional Services for.014 1,374.00 Total Charges for.014 lo() "I I t(U - 1,374.00 027-Encore Final PUD and FP(city file 18-027) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S. 5.75 132.00 759.00 Woolf,Sara S.25 81.00 20.25 Total Professional Services for.027 779.25 Total Charges for.027 Ste-2,d4S‘ 779.25 Page 1 of 3 Project COR18016.GEN Corcoran Planning Services Invoice 28717 034-Ravinia 10th FP and Final PUD(city file 18-034) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S. 25 132.00 33.00 Total Professional Services for.034 33.00 Total Charges for.034 SOo-Z0.(ds .- 33.00 037-Kariniemi PP(city file 18-037) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra S. 75 132.00 99.00 Mansolf,JP A. 2.00 71.00 142.00 Shay,Kevin M. 2.75 81.00 222.75 Total Professional Services for.037 463.75 Total Charges for.037 50L)11°456/ --463.75 038-Corcoran Land Holdings RZ, CUP and SP(city file 18-038) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S. 25 132.00 33.00 Woolf,Sara S. 1.25 81.00 101.25 Total Professional Services for.038 134.25 Total Charges for.038 5 )o-240 - $134.25 040-Ravinia 11th RZ,PP and PUD(city file 18-040) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S. 2.50 132.00 330.00 Mansolf,JP A. 1.75 71.00 124.25 Shay, Kevin M. 17.25 81.00 $1,397.25 Total Professional Services for.040 1,851.50 Total Charges for.040 Svu Zt.H6/ - $1,851.50 041 -Dahlheimer PP, FP and Variance(city file 18-041) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S. 75 132.00 99.00 Mansolf,JP A. 28.00 71.00 $1,988.00 Total Professional Services for.041 2,087.00 Total Charges for.041 sob - 2° ( ' 2,087.00 Invoice Amount $11,792.00 Page 2 of 3 Project COR18016.GEN Corcoran Planning Services Invoice 28717 Please remit to: Landform, 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Please include invoice number on remittance. Page 3 of 3 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:28717 Invoice Date:2/8/2019 Transaction ID:13203 Labor Transactions P/E Date Employee Labor Code Work Date Hrs Effort COR18016.GEN..012 SE District Plan and Guidelines Update(city file 18-012) 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/2/2019 0.25 33.00 review public safety building options 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/3/2019 0.50 66.00 review public safety building and SE plan with Emily for revisions 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/10/2019 0.50 66.00 review city direction with Emily 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/16/2019 0.25 33.00 discuss PS changes with Brad 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/21/2019 0.50 66.00 update Emily on changes from Brad 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/28/2019 0.50 66.00 review stormwater pond 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/29/2019 1.00 132.00 redlines 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/30/2019 1.00 132.00 meeting with Ken Streeter re his SE district plan ideas 01/31/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/21/2019 0.75 60.75 meeting w Kendra 01/31/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/28/2019 2.50 202.50 meeting with Kendra,prints for meeting,begin master plan draft 01/31/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/29/2019 4.00 324.00 master plan-draft in CAD 01/31/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/30/2019 12.00 972.00 master plan-draft in CAD 01/31/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/16/2019 1.75 141.75 master plan buildout 01/31/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/31/2019 12.00 972.00 master plan-draft in CAD,color,text edits to doc,fix some section labels. 01/15/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/3/2019 0.75 60.75 meeting with Kendra.Review public safety proposed site plan,send pdf to Jordan. 01/15/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/4/2019 0.75 60.75 public facilities concepts-base map and begin concepts 01/15/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/7/2019 10.00 810.00 4.5-edits to maps and graphics 5.5-public facilities-concepts and site analysis 01/15/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/8/2019 10.00 810.00 3-public facilities-finish exhibits 0.5-pull together preferred plan graphics 0.75-meeting with Kendra 5.75-edits to exhibits 01/15/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/10/2019 0.75 60.75 meeting w Kendra Total for COR18016.GEN..012 59.75 5,069.25 2/8/2019 7:45:51 AM 1 of 5 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:28717 Invoice Date:2/8/2019 Transaction ID: 13203 COR18016.GEN..014 Development Right and OS&P Ordinance Update(city file 18-014) 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/29/2019 0.50 66.00 review mapping project 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/16/2019 1.00 132.00 review draft with staff and finalize packet 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/13/2019 1.50 198.00 work session packet 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/14/2019 2.50 330.00 draft packet for review by Kevin and Brad 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/23/2019 0.50 40.50 start on development rights exhibit. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/24/2019 1.50 121.50 Make edits to the PowerPoint and create development rights exhibit. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/28/2019 0.50 40.50 Brainstorm best way to make edits to the development rights map. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/29/2019 0.50 40.50 Meet to discuss OSP and development rights changes. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/31/2019 5.00 405.00 work on new development rights map based on ordinance change. Total for COR18016.GEN..014 13.50 1,374.00 COR18016.GEN..027 Encore Final PUD and FP(city file 18-027) 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/2/2019 0.25 33.00 review outstanding issues at DRC 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/4/2019 0.25 33.00 updates from Pulte on clubhouse and outstanding issues 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/9/2019 1.00 132.00 review HOA docs and revised plans 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/10/2019 1.00 132.00 review HOA docs with city attorney and follow up with Pulte 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/16/2019 0.25 33.00 call Paul to discuss landscape plan 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/17/2019 0.50 66.00 review changes to landscape plan 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/21/2019 0.25 33.00 respond to questions from city about landscape plan 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/22/2019 0.25 33.00 landscape plans 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/30/2019 1.00 132.00 discuss architecture and review with Mike 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/15/2019 1.00 132.00 review landscape plan and new home plans 01/15/2019 Woolf,Sara S. 1/9/2019 0.25 20.25 Landscape plan submittal to file Total for COR18016.GEN..027 6.00 779.25 2/8/2019 7:45:51 AM 2 of 5 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:28717 Invoice Date:2/8/2019 Transaction ID:13203 COR18016.GEN..034 Ravinia 10th FP and Final PUD(city file 18-034) 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/29/2019 0.25 33.00 call from Lennar Total for COR18016.GEN..034 0.25 33.00 COR18016.GEN..037 Kariniemi PP(city file 18-037) 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/2/2019 0.25 33.00 discuss PH notice with city attorney 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/3/2019 0.25 33.00 powerpoint and prep for PC 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/30/2019 0.25 33.00 finalize PC 01/15/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/2/2019 0.25 20.25 start powerpoint. 01/15/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/3/2019 1.00 81.00 Work on powerpoint and 60-day extension letter. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/30/2019 0.50 40.50 Revise staff materials. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/28/2019 1.00 81.00 Edit staff report and resolution. 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/30/2019 2.00 142.00 PC Powerpoint Total for COR18016.GEN..037 5.50 463.75 COR18016.GEN..038 Corcoran Land Holdings RZ,CUP and SP(city file 18-038) 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/4/2019 0.25 33.00 complete letter 01/31/2019 Woolf,Sara S. 1/29/2019 0.25 20.25 Project withdrawn.Close out project. 01/15/2019 Woolf,Sara S. 1/2/2019 0.50 40.50 draft complete letter 01/15/2019 Woolf,Sara S. 1/4/2019 0.50 40.50 revisions to public hearing notice Total for COR18016.GEN..038 1.50 134.25 COR18016.GEN..040 Ravinia 11th RZ,PP and PUD(city file 18-040) 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/21/2019 0.25 33.00 review plans 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/30/2019 1.00 132.00 PC packet 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/16/2019 1.00 132.00 meeting with Lennar 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/2/2019 0.25 33.00 complete letter 01/15/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/2/2019 1.50 121.50 Review additional materials.Send Mike stormwater report and draft complete letter. 01/15/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/11/2019 2.50 202.50 work on PC staff report. 1 2/8/2019 7:45:51 AM 3 of 5 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:28717 Invoice Date:2/8/2019 Transaction ID: 13203 01/15/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/15/2019 1.25 101.25 Work on staff report. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/17/2019 2.00 162.00 Review hennepin comment letter. Work on staff report.Draft resolutions. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/18/2019 2.00 162.00 Work on staff report and resolutions. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/21/2019 1.50 121.50 Discuss project with Kendra. Work on staff report and resolutions. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/23/2019 2.50 202.50 Work on resolutions. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/30/2019 4.00 324.00 Revise staff materials based on engineering report.Make revisions.Pull together packet.Additional revisions. 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/30/2019 1.00 71.00 PC Powerpoint 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/31/2019 0.75 53.25 PC Powerpoint Total for COR18016.GEN..040 21.50 1,851.50 COR18016.GEN..041 Dahlheimer PP,FP and Variance(city file 18-041) 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/29/2019 0.50 66.00 follow up with city engineer on his recommendation/finalize PC packet 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/4/2019 0.25 33.00 complete letter 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/17/2019 4.00 284.00 PC Packet and Resolutions 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/23/2019 1.75 124.25 Staff Report/Powerpoint 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/28/2019 2.25 159.75 PC Packet and Resolutions 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/29/2019 3.75 266.25 PC Packet,Resolutions and powerpoint 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/3/2019 1.75 124.25 Review for Completeness 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/4/2019 4.50 319.50 Review for Completeness 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/7/2019 5.50 390.50 PC report 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/8/2019 1.50 106.50 PC report 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/9/2019 1.50 106.50 PC report 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/10/2019 1.50 106.50 PC report Total for COR18016.GEN..041 28.75 2,087.00 Total labor 136.75 11,792.00 2/8/2019 7:45:51 AM 4 of 5 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:28717 Invoice Date:2/8/2019 Transaction ID:13203 2/8/2019 7:45:51 AM 5 of 5 ZeMPW7JE L A N D F O R M From Site to Finish FEB 1 2 2019 BY•—______ 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612-252-9070 Suite 513 Fax: 612-252-9077CityofCorcoran Minneapolis,MN 55401 Web: landform.net 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran,MN 55340 INVOICE No.28720 02/08/2019 Corcoran Planning Services COR17015.GEN Contract/P0#: For Services Rendered Through 1/31/2019 001 -Corcoran 2040 Comprehensive Plan(city file 17-001) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra S. 5.50 132.00 726.00 Mansolf,JP A. 15.75 71.00 $1,118.25 Osthus,Emily T. 2.00 81.00 162.00 Shay,Kevin M. 4.00 81.00 324.00 Total Professional Services for.001 2,330.25 Total Charges for.001 10-1-1111) '-3 OU 2,330.25 038-Ordinance Amendment-Bees and Chickens(city file 17-038) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S. 2.00 132.00 264.00 Mansolf,JP A. 1.50 71.00 106.50 Shay,Kevin M. 12.25 81.00 992.25 Total Professional Services for.038 1,362.75 Total Charges for.038 I Q 6 'ly I `300 -- 1,362.75 Invoice Amount 3,693.00 Please remit to: Landform, 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Please include invoice number on remittance. Page 1 of 1 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:28720 Invoice Date:2/8/2019 Transaction ID: 13206 Labor Transactions P/E Date Employee Labor Code Work Date Hrs Effort COR17015.GEN..001 Corcoran 2040 Comprehensive Plan(city file 17-001) 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/3/2019 0.50 66.00 coordinate with Jordan on maps/data,review response to agency comments from Wenck 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/7/2019 1.00 132.00 coordinate with Jordan on maps and errors in data set 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/10/2019 0.50 66.00 parks chapter edits 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/11/2019 2.00 264.00 comp plan revisions/data updates from Wenck 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/15/2019 1.00 132.00 send housing and land use plan edits to city/coordinate map edits with Wenck 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/30/2019 0.50 66.00 review and discuss final edits with staff 01/15/2019 Osthus,Emily T. 1/11/2019 2.00 162.00 1.25-finalizing Resilience chapter edits 0.75-parks and trails map update 01/15/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/11/2019 2.00 162.00 redline land use chapter using met council and agency comments. 01/15/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/15/2019 0.25 20.25 Discuss changes with Kendra. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/28/2019 1.75 141.75 Read through and edit revised housing chapter. 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/4/2019 1.50 106.50 Agency Comments 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/8/2019 6.25 443.75 Parks Chapter Edits 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/9/2019 0.75 53.25 Parks Chapter Edits 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/10/2019 3.00 213.00 Park edits 01/15/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/15/2019 3.00 213.00 Park edits 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/28/2019 1.25 88.75 Parks Chapter Revisions Total for COR17015.GEN..001 27.25 2,330.25 COR17015.GEN..038 Ordinance Amendment-Bees and Chickens(city file 17-038) 01/15/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/8/2019 0.50 66.00 coordinate with Ken on bees/reach out to Rita on APA speaker 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/25/2019 0.25 33.00 report revisions 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/29/2019 0.50 66.00 coordinate with subcommittee chair and UofM 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/30/2019 0.50 66.00 2/8/2019 10:46:00 AM 1 of 2 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:28720 Invoice Date:2/8/2019 Transaction ID: 13206 finalize PC packet 01/31/2019 Lindahl,Kendra S. 1/16/2019 0.25 33.00 talk to Ken about ordinance changes 01/15/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/2/2019 0.50 40.50 Review animal ordinance redlines. 01/15/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/4/2019 1.50 121.50 Watch city council video discussion.Pull setback standards from Minnesota cities.Review U of M bee videos. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/21/2019 3.00 243.00 Work on bee ordinance and resolution. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/22/2019 2.50 202.50 Work on staff materials. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/25/2019 2.50 202.50 Revise staff report. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/28/2019 1.25 101.25 add additional info to staff report. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/29/2019 0.50 40.50 pull together packet for PC. 01/31/2019 Shay,Kevin M. 1/30/2019 0.50 40.50 Revise definition and make packet. 01/31/2019 Mansolf,JP A. 1/31/2019 1.50 106.50 PC Powerpoint Total for COR17015.GEN..038 15.75 1,362.75 Total labor 43.00 3,693.00 2/8/2019 10:46:00 AM 2 of 2 Vendor: METRO WEST INSPECTION SRV CITY OF CORCORAN Date 2-1-19 PAYMENT VOUCHER Address: METRO WEST INSPECTION SRV BOX 248 Payment Total: $ 18,703.48 LORETTO,MN 55357 Due Date: 03/03/19 I Fund Department Account Description Amount 100 20201 INSPECTION-2015 100 20201 INSPECTION-2016 100 42400 300 FINALIZED INSPECTIONS 1860 18,703.48 100 20201 INSPECTION-2016 100 42400 300 INSPECTION-2017 I 100 42400 300 MEETINGS& PLAN REVIEWS 100 42400 300 MEETINGS& PLAN REVIEWS 100 42200 300 FIRE MARSHALL INSPECTIONS f TOTAL : $ 18,703.48 Approved Notes Check# s Metro West Inspection Services, Inc. 689 Medina St, Suite 250 Loretto, MN 55357 Metro West Inspection Services, Inc. INVOICE BILL TO INVOICE# 1860 City of Corcoran DATE 01/30/2019 8200 County Rd 116 ECEiVEJ' Corcoran, MN 55340 FEB 01 2019 BY• ACTIVITY HOURS RATE AMOUNT Finaled Permits 1 18,703.48 18,703.48 Finaled permits December 2018 BALANCE DUE 18,703.48 METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES,INC. BOX 248 LORETTO,MN 55357 PH.763-479-1720 FAX 763-479-3090 BILLED TO: 1 City of Corcoran i 8200 County Rd 116 Corcoran,MN 55340 Invoice Date January 30,2019 35%Mlelble Fees,100%investigationPermit* Permit Address Mechanical,Plumbing,Plan Tow Fees akdc,SEC 2017-00001 23120 Larsen Rd 156.34 54.72 2017-00002 6654 Bridle Path 100.00 35.00 2017-00003 19604 Country Cr E 85.00 29.75 2017-00004 19319 Bridel Path 15.00 5.25 2017-00005 19303 Sorrel Ct 15.00 5.25 2017-00007 19130 Galloway Cr 15.00 5.25 2017-00008 6684 Carriage Way 15.00 5.25 2017-00010 19202 Galloway Cr 15.00 5.25 2017-00021 22510 State Hwy 55 318.04 111.31 2017-00036 7900 Co Rd 116 156.34 54.72 2017-00037 6457 Bridle Path 100.00 35.00 2017-00047 19041 Galloway Cr 15.00 5.25 2017-00050 6453 Larkspur Ln 15.00 5.25 2017-00060 19288 Sorrel Ct 100.00 35.00 2017-00061 6421 Bluestem Cr 100.00 35.00 2017-00062 22110 Woodland LA 90.00 31.50 2017-00063 6410 Larkspur Ct 100.00 35.00 2017-00064 7800 Maple Hill Rd 90.00 31.50 2017-00065 19118 Galloway Cr 100.00 35.00 2017-00068 8100 Strehler Rd 267.54 93.64 2017-00070 9027 Brandywine Rd 90.00 31.50 2017-00076 6438 Larkspur Ln 15.00 5.25 2017-00084 6681 Bridle Path 100.00 35.00 2017-00087 6663 Carriage Way 100.00 35.00 2017-00088 19223 Bridle Path 502.84 175.99 2017-00092 23030 State Hwy 55 549.04 192.16 2017-00104 6474 Larkspur Ln 100.00 35.00 2017-00111 19327 Sorrel Ct 618.34 216.42 2017-00119 6462 Larkspur Ln 15.00 5.25 2017-00120 19121 Galloway Cr 15.00 5.25 2017-00130 8715 Garrison LA 90.00 31.50 2017-00131 6430 Bluestem Cr 200.00 70.00 2017-00138 9520 Fox Valley Dr 90.00 31.50 2017-00144 7965 Corcoran Tr E 90.00 31.50 2017-00147 7800 Maple Hill Rd 20.00 7.00 2017-00160 6474 Larkspur Ln 15.00 5.25 2017-00161 19154 Galloway Cr 100.00 35.00 2017-00162 19235 Bridle Path 100.00 35.00 2017-00163 19235 Bridle Path 100.00 35.00 2017-00176 19316 Bridle Path 200.00 70.00 Page Total 1,742.47 Invoice Total 18,703.4$ METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES,INC. BOX 248 LORETTO,MN 55357 PH.763-479-1720 FAX 763-479-3090 MI ED ED City of Corcoran 8200 County Rd 116 Corcoran,MN 55340 awoke cote January 30,2019 35% Permit g Plmdt Address Mechanical,Pbwtbins,Plan 100%Eligible Fees Total Fees Check 2017-00186 21070 Horseshoe Tr 592.98 532.54 2017-00187 10125 Hage Dr 814.52 285.08 2017-00188 19121 Galloway Cr 456.64 159.82 2017-00328 19331 Bridle Path 5,442.34 1,904.82 2017-00373 6310 Steeple Chase Ln 5,437.34 1,903.07 2018-00175 8035 Ridge Ct 3,046.16 1,066.16 2018-00184 6463 Bluestem Rd N 1,693.16 592.61 2018-00197 6470 Larkspur Ct 5,039.36 1,763.78 2018-00205 9100 Brandywine Rd 1,817.62 636.17 2018-00230 19377 Lupine Ln 6,231.02 2,180.86 2018-00231 6349 Steeple Chase Ln 5,227.33 1,829.57 2018-00262 19337 Annabelle Ln 5,644.02 1,975.41 2018-00305 19370 Annabelle Ln 6,099.66 2,134.88 2018-00309 9840 Garden La 747.87 261.75 2018-00350 22120 Woodland LA 90.00 31.50 2018-00383 7270 Co Rd 19 100.00 35.00 2018-00394 10185 Highland Ridge Rd 75.00 26.25 2018-00401 9825 High Bluff La 150.00 52.50 2018-00403 22622 Co Rd 10 90.00 31.50 2018-00406 9218 Brandywine Rd 75.00 26.25 2018-00407 21636 Nystrom LA 90.00 31.50 Page Total 16,961.01 Invoice Total 18,703.44 v.ndor. Wenck CITY OF CORCORAN Date: 2-8-19 PAYMENT VOUCHER Address: Wenck 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Payment Total: $ 85,442.03 PO Box 249 Maple Plain,MN 55359-0249 Due Date:_ 03/10/19 Fund De.:rtment Account Desch• Ion Id 100 43170 300 General En•Services 354-8• +T 3,C x:)`So 100 43170 300 Bride and MSA Feasibili Stud 100 43170 300 Larkin&Rollin. Hills Overla 100 43170 300 Storm Water-En.ineerin• 5---9 e?5:2e I oc1QV+4) 100 43170 300 Ci of Corcoran-Ori•in&Destination Stud 100 45200 300 City Park Wetland Delineation 101 41911 300 2040 CORCORAN COMP PLAN 4406100- 'PO((DI 4,40 3— • i 91401 lYO --PALS '•'n• I' 741MONIM 50 415 45200 262 RAVINIA PARK DESIGN 415 45200 520 PARK DEDICATION 419 43100 303 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 2294-0028 422 43100 530 DT UTILITY PROJECT-STREET 37% 422 49400 530 ali 11 I Y 9:Z Ax able\:LFrj 422 49450 530 DT UTILITY PROJECT-SEWER 35% 423 45200 510 Rockford School District Environmental Site Assessment 424 43100 530 Bass Lake Crossing M/I Home 17-012 CR 10 TURN LANES 58.80 Vi42549450530PulteEncore-NE Trunk Sewer 10,471.20 V 425 43100 530 Pulte Encore-Turn Lanes CSAH 101 and Encore 9,339.50 N.J 427 43100 530 66th Street Design and Construction 6,023.50 V 427 43100 530 CSAH 116 and Gleason Parkwa urn Lanes 1,670.70 +7 601 49400 303 lL I 4, , sI-3. 30 602 49450 303 r - ,E ! 48102; `5 602 49450 303 MCES SEWER EXTENSION 602 49450 303 Ma•le Hill Estates Wastewater Connection 601 49400 303 2019 Trunk Water Main Im•rovements 6,099.85 it 500 20247 Sunram Permits,Acct.#500-20247 500 20335 LENNAR-ENGINEERING 15,383.36 1 I ti 500 20335 Wessel Prose Feasibili Stud 1,909.00 Y/ 500 20335 LENNAR-ENGINEERING-66th Street Design&Construction 500 20369 Sunram Permits,Acct.#500-20369 500 20376 PARK PLACE STORAGE 164.94 500 20389 STREHLER ESTATES 16-001 i_ 500 20392 MN SOLAR 500 20415 MI HOMES 500 20416 11•1gu "r,I{'_ -007— 1ac„ 171.60 500 20418 Pheasant Ridge Sketch 17-009 500 20423 = Bass Lake Estates Sketch PUD 17-015 2,082.00 N./ 500 20425 Gmach Prelim/Final Plat 17-017 500 20434 Hoppe-Lot Consolid.17-027 500 20436 Pulte Encore-PUD Skch 17-029 4,692.62 V. 500 20438 rYF-FAi:«:rt xr-y+•r•Y hh:r•;•a arnI l at. •_ 1,096.04 500 20446 Rush Creek Run PP 18-001 500 20448 Male Hill A.t PUD Skch 18-005 500 20451 Doboszenski Sons Inc 18-008 500 20453 Fehn Meadows 2nd Add PP 18-017 500 20454 Edgewater Corcoran Skch 18-018 500 20459 Refuge of Rush Creek FP 18-028 500 20464 Cushman/Wakefield Sewer Exten. 500 20467 Corcoran Land RZ/CUP/SP 18-038 -_ i TOTAL: $ 85,442.03 i Approved Notes Cheek/ 10\rt. 1k. ylokig City of Corcoran January 2019 Invoices City Projects, Invoice no. Project nos. Project name Amount City Fund # 11900123 2294-01 General Engineering Services 200 Planning 4,187.40 100-43170-300 500-01 General 400.40 100-43170-300 500-02 Council Meetings and Engineering Admins 132.00 100-43170-300 500-05 2040 Comprehensive Plan 10,956.00 101-41911-300 Total $ 15,675.80 Total City Projects $ 15,675.80 Escrow Projects Invoice no. Project nos. Project name Amount City Fund # 11900124 2294-17 Lennar Development 500-20335 200 Construction Plan Reviews and Approvals 12,914.70 300 Construction Inspection 2,468.66 Total $ 15,383.36 11900166 B2294-0025 MCES Lift Station Construction 602-49450-303 Phase 03 L80 Site Observation 468.82 Total $ 468.82 11900167 B2294-0027 CR 10 Turn Lanes 424-43100-530 Phase 950 Project Closeout 58.80 Total $ 58.80 1-127 11900127 B2294-0031 66th Street Design and Construction 5O 21JajS' Phase 050 Project Administration/Legal/Property 950.40 Phase 200 Surveying 285.00 Phase 300 Design 4,788.10 Total $6,023.50 11900168 B2294-0032 Escrow Projects Phase 01 Park Place Storage, Acct #500-20261 164.94 500-20376 Phase 02 Bass Lake Crossings 1,096.04 500-20438 Phase 04 Bass Lake Estates and Storage 2,082.00 500-20423 Phase 08 Sunrise Solar 171.60 500-20416 Total $3,514.58 11900129 B2294-0033 Pulte NE Sewer and Development Feasibility Study 500-20436 Phase 100 General Engineering and Project Coordination 290.40 Phase 200 Plan Review 1,640.20 Phase 300 Stormwater 1,473.30 Phase 400 Construction Observation 1,288.72 Total $4,692.62 11900133 B2294-0035 Northeast Trunk Sewer 425-49450-530 Phase 200 Route Surveying and Easements 2,852.50 Phase 300 Initial Construction Plan Engineering 487.60 Phase 500 Construction Inspection 7,131.10 Total $ 10,471.20 Escrow Projects. Invoice no. Project nos. Project name Amount City Fund # 11900135 B2294-0037 Turn Lanes CSAH 101 and Encore 425-43100-530 Phase 200 Route Surveying 820.00 Phase 400 Construction Plan Engineering 8,519.50 Total $9,339.50 11900169 B2294-0040 2019 Utility Improvement Project 601-49400-303 Phase 200 Surveying 1,964.25 Phase 300 Design 4,135.60 Total $6,099.85 11900142 B2294-0042 CSAH 116 and Gleason Parkway Turn Lanes 427-43100-530 Phase 200 Surveying 712.50 Phase 300 Design 958.20 Total $1,670.70 11900170 B2294-0043 Wessel Property Feasibility Study 500-20335 Phase 100 Transportation 1,008.00 Phase 200 Sewer 46.50 Phase 300 Water 854.50 Total $1,909.00 11900144 B2294-0044 Transportation 100-43170-300 Phase 100 MnDOT State Aid 1,782.50 Phase 300 City Traffic Items 852.50 Total $2,635.00 11900147 B2294-0045 Stormwater 100-43170-300 Phase 100 General 983.40 Phase 300 MS4 891.80 Total $1,875.20 11900152 B2294-0047 Sewer Utility 602-49450-303 Phase 100 Field Inspection 635.80 Total $ 635.80 11900153 82294-0048 Water Utility 601-49400-303 Phase 100 Field Inspection 328.50 Phase 300 NE Water Supply 4,659.80 Total $4,988.30 Total Escrow Projects $ 69,766.23 Invoice Total $ 85,442.03 V WENCK ASSOCIATES Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. February 6th, 2019 Mr. Brad Martens City Administrator FEB 0 8 2019 City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 BY: RE: Wenck's January 2019 Invoices Dear Brad: Engineering efforts for January were infrastructure projects of Gleason Parkway Extension, Northeast Sewer, 2019 Trunk Water Main, CR 101 Turn Lanes for Pulte and review work on developments. The final modifications and maps for the Comprehensive Plan were completed for the February 28th Council meeting. City project codes were added to Wenck invoice summary sheet (after a meeting with staff and Wenck accounting) to improve tracking process. Unbilled time included office hours at City Hall, various phone and resident conversations and responding to engineering questions in support of staff. If you have any questions as you review this letter or our invoices, please contact me at 763-479-4209, ktorve @wenck.com, or City Hall. Sincerely, Wenck Associates, Inc. Kent Torve, P.E., LEED AP Principal enc: January 2019 Invoices] Wenck Associates,Inc. I 1800 Pioneer Creek Center I P.O. Box 249 I Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp @wenck.com Web wenck.com Invoice 7A7 February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900123 A1EI1CIC City of Corcoran, MN 8200 County Road 116 onsRes ive partner.Corcoran, MN 55340 p p Exceptional outcomes. Project Manager Kent Torve Project 2294-01 Corcoran General Engineering Services Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 200 PLANNING PLANNING Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Larson, Mitchell 1.00 90.00 90.00 Nelson, Susan 2.00 80.00 160.00 Raymond, Luann 30 70.00 21.00 Shuck,Jordan 10.00 125.00 1,250.00 Torve, Kent 20.20 132.00 2,666.40 Totals 33.50 4,187.40 Total Labor 4,18j/ 61L/ 4y Phase Total 4,. 7.40 ---/// 111 Phase 500-01 General General Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Raymond, Luann 1.10 70.00 77.00 Wyers, Nicholas 3.30 98.00 323.40 Totals 4.40 400.40 Total Labor 400 tF0 44 DOA,00 Phase Total 4$0.40 Phase 500-02 Council Meetings and Engineering Adminis Council Meetings and Engineering Administrative Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Torve, Kent 1.00 132.00 132.00 Totals 1.00 132.00 Total Labor 132.00 Phase Total 132.00 Phase 500-05 2040 Comprehensive Plan 2040 Corcoran Comprehensive Plan INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Project 2294-01 Corcoran General Engineering Services Invoice 11900123 Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Bowers, Matthew 36.40 155.00 5,642.00 Shuck,Jordan 23.80 125.00 2,975.00 Terhaar, Edward 7.00 155.00 1,085.00 Torve, Kent 9.50 132.00 1,254.00 Totals 76.70 10,956.00 Total Labor 10,95 00 U} O/ /_jq, Ur) t0 Phase Total 10,6.00 Total Invoice Amount 15,675.80 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the Page 2 invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Project 2294-01 Corcoran General Engineering Services Invoice 11900123 Billing Backup Tuesday, February 5, 2015 WAI -Wenck Associates, Inc. Invoice 11900123 Dated 2/5/2019 12:23:06 PM Project 2294-01 Corcoran General Engineering Services Phase 200 PLANNING PLANNING Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount 777 921 - Larson, Mitchell 1/24/2019 1.00 90.00 90.00 Mapping 335 923 - Nelson, Susan 1/9/2019 2.00 80.00 160.00 dolt,' Lump 1914,,nReviewRogersdraft2040CompPlanforsurfacewaterplansand projects; compare to Elm Creek watershed CIP for Rush Creek and Stone's Throw/Laurel Creek wetland project; email Kent. 714 911 - Raymond, Luann 1/28/2019 30 70.00 21.00 Calendar set-up and reminder email 243 933 - Shuck,Jordan 1/4/2019 2.50 125.00 312.50 Downtown Landuse Analysis and data creation 243 933 - Shuck,Jordan 1/11/2019 50 125.00 62.50 Downtown Concept map 243 933 - Shuck,Jordan 1/20/2019 3.00 125.00 375.00 4 .5 afmwo, !' Downtown Pond Concept 243 933 - Shuck,Jordan 1/21/2019 2.50 125.00 312.50 mapping 243 933 - Shuck,Jordan 1/31/2019 1.50 125.00 187.50 Three rivers data 063 962-Torve, Kent 1/4/2019 1.50 132.00 198.00 SE District Stormwater footprints 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/7/2019 1.00 132.00 132.00 Weekly engineering meeting 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/7/2019 4.00 132.00 528.00 SE District Stormwater and regional footprints 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/9/2019 1.00 132.00 132.00 DRC staff meeting, SE District engineering deliverables 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/10/2019 2.00 132.00 2.6.4+4_ SE District topo and pond locations 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/16/2019 50 132.00 66.00 DRC general topics, schedule, ordinance schedule, etc 063 962-Torve, Kent 1/21/2019 3.00 132.00 396.00 SE District stormwater plan J 063 962-Torve, Kent 1/22/2019 2.00 132.00 264.00 SE District stormwater plan 063 962-Torve, Kent 1/23/2019 1.50 132.00 198.00 SE District stormwater plan y lZ _ 5 10 063 962-Torve, Kent 1/23/2019 50 132.00 66.00 G " DRC staff meeting on schedule and deliverables 4- i60 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/28/2019 90 132.00 118.80 rt-SE District stormwater and ROW j '3?7iiJ- 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/30/2019 80 132.00 105.60 J SE District Guidelines staff discussion and stormwater 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/31/2019 1.50 132.00 198.00 SE District stormwater regional permitting approach Totals 33.50 4,187.40 4,,87 Jtt l k ICJ Total Labor INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the Page 3 invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249-Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.comWebwww.wenck.com Project 2294-01 Corcoran General Engineering Services Invoice 11900123 Phase Total 4,187.40 Phase 500-01 General General Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount 714 911 - Raymond, Luann 1/11/2019 80 70.00 56.00 Preparing budget spreadsheet and cover letter 714 911 - Raymond, Luann 1/15/2019 30 70.00 21.00 preparing cover letter and invoices and then emailing to Corcoran f 706 922 -Wyers, Nicholas 1/2/2019 2.00 98.00 196.00 Igai 610.66 set up annual City small utility meeting 706 922 -Wyers, Nicholas 1/14/2019 1.00 98.00 98.00 LiCk%O°6/9+6 small utility coordination, CR 10/50 project b 706 922 - Wyers, Nicholas 1/29/2019 30 98.00 29.40 Agti lift station attorney coordination Q0 Totals 4.40 400.40,1 14`x' iLat Total Labor 400.40 Phase Total 4 .40 307,ai Phase 500-02 Council Meetings and Engineering Adminis Council Meetings and Engineering Administrative i Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/24/2019 1.00 132.00 132.00 Council meeting and workshop 1.0 hour Totals 1.00 132.00 Total Labor 132.00 Phase Total 132.00 Phase 500-05 2040 Comprehensive Plan 2040 Corcoran Comprehensive Plan Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount 030 952 - Bowers, Matthew 1/2/2019 2.80 155.00 434.00 Technical Review/Revisions 030 952 - Bowers, Matthew 1/3/2019 3.50 155.00 542.50 Technical Review/Revisions 030 952 - Bowers, Matthew 1/7/2019 6.40 155.00 992.00 Comp Plan Revisions 030 952 - Bowers, Matthew 1/8/2019 8.70 155.00 1,348.50 Comp Plan Revisions 030 952 - Bowers, Matthew 1/9/2019 2.80 155.00 434.00 Comp Plan Revisions&Agency Responses 030 952 - Bowers, Matthew 1/9/2019 2.50 155.00 387.50 Review Rogers Comp Plan 030 952 - Bowers, Matthew 1/10/2019 4.10 155.00 635.50 Comp Plan Revisions&Agency Responses 030 952 - Bowers, Matthew 1/17/2019 2.60 155.00 403.00 Sewer Revisions INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the Page 4 invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249-Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Project 2294-01 Corcoran General Engineering Services Invoice 11900123 030 952 - Bowers, Matthew 1/21/2019 2.60 155.00 403.00 Sewer Revisions 030 952 - Bowers, Matthew 1/29/2019 40 155.00 62.00 Sewer Revisions 243 933 -Shuck,Jordan 1/2/2019 2.00 125.00 250.00 mapping 243 933 - Shuck,Jordan 1/3/2019 4.00 125.00 500.00 mapping 243 933 - Shuck, Jordan 1/4/2019 3.00 125.00 375.00 mapping 243 933 -Shuck, Jordan 1/7/2019 4.00 125.00 500.00 mapping and lu/sewer flow analysis 243 933 -Shuck,Jordan 1/8/2019 4.00 125.00 500.00 mapping and lu/sewer flow analysis 243 933 -Shuck,Jordan 1/10/2019 3.50 125.00 437.50 mapping 243 933 -Shuck,Jordan 1/11/2019 1.50 125.00 187.50 mapping 243 933 -Shuck,Jordan 1/15/2019 1.00 125.00 125.00 mapping 243 933 -Shuck,Jordan 1/29/2019 50 125.00 62.50 data to landform, street surface type 243 933 -Shuck,Jordan 1/30/2019 30 125.00 37.50 mapping 293 951 -Terhaar, Edward 1/2/2019 3.00 155.00 465.00 comp plan updates 293 951 -Terhaar, Edward 1/7/2019 2.00 155.00 310.00 comp plan updates 293 951 -Terhaar, Edward 1/8/2019 2.00 155.00 310.00 comp plan updates 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/4/2019 2.20 132.00 290.40 Plymouth and Rogers comp plan reviews 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/8/2019 80 132.00 105.60 Adjacent communities review and summary 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/9/2019 1.20 132.00 158.40 Adjacent communities review and summary 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/10/2019 1.50 132.00 198.00 Adjacent communities review and summary r 063 962-Torve, Kent 1/17/2019 2.80 132.00 369.60 5rG ,O)Wri 1 Regional Pond locations per topo 063 962 -Torve, Kent 1/22/2019 1.00 132.00 132.00 d 1 Project meeting on alignment with invoicing and accounting Totals 76.70 10,956.00 Total Labor 10,95 0 u Phase Total 10, 6.00 1 `$ 1i,40 Project Total 15,675.80 ___ _--- 1 of(oIw.40TotalthisReport15,675.80 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the Page 5 invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice VA.A February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900124 W E N C K Mr. Brad Martens City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Exceptional outcomes. Corcoran, MN 55340 Project Manager Kent Torve Project 2294-17 Lennar Development Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 200 Construction Plan Reviews and Approvals Construction Plan Reviews and Approvals Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Bowers, Matthew 7.00 155.00 1,085.00 Butler, Samuel 6.20 87.00 539.40 Erickson, Mindy 30 60.00 18.00 Schmidt, Rowdy 2.50 125.00 312.50 Shoemaker,Todd 19.40 155.00 3,007.00 Terhaar, Edward 1.00 155.00 155.00 Torve, Kent 16.50 132.00 2,178.00 Tourtillott, Danielle 35.40 102.00 3,610.80 Wyers, Nicholas 20.50 98.00 2,009.00 Tota Is 108.80 12,914.70 Total Labor 12,914.70 Phase Total 12,914.70 Phase 300 Construction Inspection Construction Inspection Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Butler,Samuel 3.70 87.00 321.90 Schmidt, Rowdy 14.50 125.00 1,812.50 Wyers, Nicholas 2.60 98.00 254.80 Tota Is 20.80 2,389.20 Total Labor 2,389.20 Reimbursable Expenses Mileage - Reimbursable 79.46 Total Reimbursables 79.46 79.46 Phase Total 2,468.66 Total Invoice Amount 15,383.36 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice V • A February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900166 WENCK Mr. Brad Martens City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Exceptional outcomes. Corcoran, MN 55340 Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0025 MCES Lift Station Construction Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 03 L80 Site Observation L80 Site Observation Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Schmidt, Rowdy 3.50 125.00 437.50 Totals 3.50 437.50 Total Labor 437.50 Reimbursable Expenses Mileage- Reimbursable 31.32 Total Reimbursables 31.32 31.32 Phase Total 468.82 Total Invoice Amount 468.82 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Project B2294-0025 MCES Lift Station Construction Invoice 11900166 Billing Backup Tuesday, February 5, 2015 WAI -Wenck Associates, Inc. Invoice 11900166 Dated 2/5/2019 12:48:32 PM Project B2294-0025 MCES Lift Station Construction Phase 03 L80 Site Observation L80 Site Observation Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount 394 941 -Schmidt, Rowdy 1/2/2019 1.00 125.00 125.00 Review Pumping status 394 941 -Schmidt, Rowdy 1/8/2019 1.50 125.00 187.50 Site Review - sewer pumping 394 941 - Schmidt, Rowdy 1/21/2019 1.00 125.00 125.00 Site Review/Sew Status Totals 3.50 437.50 Total Labor 437.50 Reimbursable Expenses Mileage- Reimbursable EX 000000032848 1/2/2019 Schmidt, Rowdy/ Mileage/ 17.00 miles @ 9.86 0.58 EX 000000032848 1/8/2019 Schmidt, Rowdy/ Mileage/ 19.00 miles @ 11.02 0.58 EX 000000032848 1/21/2019 Schmidt, Rowdy/ Mileage/ 18.00 miles @ 10.44 0.58 Total Reimbursables 31.32 31.32 Phase Total 468.82 Project Total 468.82 Total this Report 468.82 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the Page 2 invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice VA.A February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900167 WENCK Mr. Brad Martens City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Exceptional outcomes. Corcoran, MN 55340 Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0027 CR 10 Turn Lanes Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 950 Project Closeout Project Closeout Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Wyers, Nicholas 60 98.00 58.80 Totals 60 58.80 Total Labor 58.80 Phase Total 58.80 Total Invoice Amount 58.80 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice VA. February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900127 1ErCK Mr. Brad Martens City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Exceptional outcomes. Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0031 66th Street Design and Construction Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 050 Project Administration/Legal/Property Project Administration/Legal/Property Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Torve, Kent 7.20 132.00 950.40 Totals 7.20 950.40 Total Labor 950.40 Phase Total 950.40 Phase 200 Surveying Surveying Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Halls, Matthew 3.00 95.00 285.00 Totals 3.00 285.00 Total Labor 285.00 Phase Total 285.00 Phase 300 Design Design Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Halls, Matthew 5.00 95.00 475.00 Louwagie, Shawn 2.00 125.00 250.00 Pierce, Lauren 1.50 90.00 135.00 Schmidt, Rowdy 4.00 125.00 500.00 Shoemaker,Todd 4.50 155.00 697.50 Torve, Kent 2.50 132.00 330.00 Tourtillott, Danielle 4.80 102.00 489.60 Wyers, Nicholas 19.50 98.00 1,911.00 Totals 43.80 4,788.10 Total Labor 4,788.10 Phase Total 4,788.10 Total Invoice Amount 6,023.50 Current Prior Total INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Project B2294-0031 66th Street Design and Construction Invoice 11900127 Billing Summary 6,023.50 10,865.10 16,888.60 I INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the Page 2 invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice V V A February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900168 WENCK Mr. Brad Martens City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Exceptional outcomes. Corcoran, MN 55340 Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0032 Escrow Projects Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 01 Park Place Storage,Acct. #500-20261 Park Place Storage,Acct. #500-20261 Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Butler, Samuel 1.10 87.00 95.70 Wyers, Nicholas 60 98.00 58.80 Totals 1.70 154.50 Total Labor 154.50 Reimbursable Expenses Mileage- Reimbursable 10.44 Total Reimbursables 10A4 10.44 Phase Total 164.94 Phase 02 Bass Lake Crossings Bass Lake Crossings Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Butler, Samuel 2.10 87.00 182.70 Penshorn,John 20 80.00 16.00 Schmidt, Rowdy 50 125.00 62.50 Torve, Kent 5.80 132.00 765.60 Wyers, Nicholas 60 98.00 58.80 Totals 9.20 1,085.60 Total Labor 1,085.60 Reimbursable Expenses Mileage- Reimbursable 10.44 Total Reimbursables 10.44 10.44 Phase Total 1,096.04 Phase 04 Bass Lake Estates and Storage Bass Lake Estates and Storage Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Butler,Samuel 4.00 87.00 348.00 Schmidt, Rowdy 1.50 125.00 187.50 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Project B2294-0032 Escrow Projects Invoice 11900168 Shoemaker,Todd 80 155.00 124.00 Tourtillott, Danielle 13.00 102.00 1,326.00 Wyers, Nicholas 60 98.00 58.80 Totals 19.90 2,044.30 Total Labor 2,044.30 Reimbursable Expenses Mileage- Reimbursable 37.70 Total Reimbursables 37.70 37.70 Phase Total 2,082.00 Phase 05 Small Projects Small Projects Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Torve, Kent 1/9/2019 50 132.00 66.00 Dahlheimer Estates review Torve, Kent 1/10/2019 80 132.00 105.60 Dahlheimer Estates review Totals 1.30 171.60 Total Labor 171.60 Phase Total 171.60 Total Invoice Amount 3,514.58 Current Prior Total Billing Summary 3,514.58 167,694.75 171,209.33 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the Page 2 invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice V . AFebruary5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900129 lE1CK Kevin Mattson City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner.8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Exceptional outcomes. Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0033 Pulte Development Infrastructure Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 100 General Engineering and Project Coordina General Engineering and Project Coordination Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Torve, Kent 2.20 132.00 290.40 Totals 2.20 290.40 Total Labor 290.40 Phase Total 290.40 Phase 200 Plan Review Plan Review Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Butler, Samuel 3.90 87.00 339.30 Schmidt, Rowdy 2.50 125.00 312.50 Torve, Kent 6.30 132.00 831.60 Wyers, Nicholas 1.60 98.00 156.80 Totals 14.30 1,640.20 Total Labor 1,640.20 Phase Total 1,640.20 Phase 300 Stormwater Stormwater Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Elemes, Daniel 1.00 102.00 102.00 Shoemaker,Todd 2.70 155.00 418.50 Torve, Kent 6.60 132.00 871.20 Tourtillott, Danielle 80 102.00 81.60 Totals 11.10 1,473.30 Total Labor 1,473.30 Phase Total 1,473.30 Phase 400 Construction Observation Construction Observation 1 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.comWebwww.wenck.com Project B2294-0033 Pulte Development Infrastructure Invoice 11900129 Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Butler, Samuel 80 87.00 69.60 Schmidt, Rowdy 7.00 125.00 875.00 Wyers, Nicholas 2.60 98.00 254.80 Totals 10.40 1,199.40 Total Labor 1,199.40 Reimbursable Expenses Mileage- Reimbursable 89.32 Total Reimbursables 89.32 89.32 Phase Total 1,288.72 Total Invoice Amount 4,692.62 Current Prior Total Billing Summary 4,692.62 146,454.08 151,146.70 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the Page 2 invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice VA.A February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900133 WENCK Kevin Mattson City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Exceptional outcomes. Corcoran, MN 55340 Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0035 Northeast Trunk Sewer Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 200 Route Surveying and Easements Route Surveying and Easements Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Halls, Matthew 12.00 95.00 1,140.00 Kraemer,Timothy 15.00 80.00 1,200.00 Totals 27.00 2,340.00 Total Labor 2,340.00 Unit Billing 00-WAI Vehicle Maple Plain 150.0 Miles @ 0.75 112.50 01-Survey Supplies/Equipment 20.0 Hours @ 20.00 400.00 Total Units 512.50 512.50 Phase Total 2,852.50 Phase 300 Construction Plan Engineering Construction Plan Engineering Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Torve, Kent 2.30 132.00 303.60 Totals 2.30 303.60 Total Labor 303.60 Reimbursable Expenses Permits/Bonds/Insurance-Reimbursable 184.00 Total Reimbursables 184.00 184.00 Phase Total 487.60 Phase 500 Construction Inspection Construction Inspection Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Bowers, Matthew 6.10 155.00 945.50 Butler, Samuel 28.70 87.00 2,496.90 Schmidt, Rowdy 19.50 125.00 2,437.50 Torve, Kent 90 132.00 118.80 Wyers, Nicholas 8.80 98.00 862.40 Totals 64.00 6,861.10 Total Labor 6,861.10 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Project B2294-0035 Northeast Trunk Sewer Invoice 11900133 Unit Billing Trimble GPS Unit 270.00 Total Units 270.00 270.00 Phase Total 7,131.10 Total Invoice Amount 10,471.20 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the Page 2 invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice V V A February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900135 W E N C K Mr. Brad Martens City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Exceptional outcomes. Corcoran, MN 55340 Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0037 Turn Lanes CSAH 101 and Encore Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 200 Route Surveying Route Surveying Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Halls, Matthew 7.00 95.00 665.00 Kraemer,Timothy 1.50 80.00 120.00 Totals 8.50 785.00 Total Labor 785.00 Unit Billing 00-WAI Vehicle Maple Plain 01-Survey Supplies/Equipment 35.00 Phase Total 820.00 Phase 400 Construction Plan Engineering Construction Plan Engineering Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Butler, Samuel 50.30 87.00 4,376.10 Schmidt, Rowdy 4.00 125.00 500.00 Schroeher, Mark 5.00 125.00 625.00 Wyers, Nicholas 30.80 98.00 3,018.40 Totals 90.10 8,519.50 Total Labor 8,519.50 Phase Total 8,519.50 Total Invoice Amount 9,339.50 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice VAN A February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900169 W E N C K Kevin Mattson City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Exceptional outcomes. Corcoran, MN 55340 Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0040 2019 Utility Improvement Project Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 200 Surveying Surveying Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Bjorklund, Gary 1.70 137.00 232.90 Halls, Matthew 15.00 95.00 1,425.00 Kraemer,Timothy 3.00 80.00 240.00 Totals 19.70 1,897.90 Total Labor 1,897.90 Unit Billing 00-WAI Vehicle Maple Plain 01-Survey Supplies/Equipment 66.35 Phase Total 1,964.25 Phase 300 Design Design Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Butler,Samuel 6.00 87.00 522.00 Halls, Matthew 16.50 95.00 1,567.50 Schmidt, Rowdy 50 125.00 62.50 Torve, Kent 3.00 132.00 396.00 Wyers, Nicholas 16.20 98.00 1,587.60 Totals 42.20 4,135.60 Total Labor 4,135.60 Phase Total 4,135.60 Total Invoice Amount 6,099.85 Current Prior Total Billing Summary 6,099.85 4,915.30 11,015.15 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice VA. February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900142 i'1EI1CK Kevin Mattson City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Exceptional outcomes. Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0042 CSAH 116 and Gleason Parkway Turn Lanes Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 200 Surveying Surveying Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Halls, Matthew 7.50 95.00 712.50 Totals 7.50 712.50 Total Labor 712.50 Phase Total 712.50 Phase 300 Design Design Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Halls, Matthew 2.00 95.00 190.00 Larson, Mitchell 1.00 90.00 90.00 Louwagie, Shawn 80 125.00 100.00 Wyers, Nicholas 5.90 98.00 578.20 Totals 9.70 958.20 Total Labor 958.20 Phase Total 958.20 Total Invoice Amount 1,670.70 Current Prior Total Billing Summary 1,670.70 0.00 1,670.70 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249-Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900170 lEICK Kevin Mattson City of Corcoran, MN onsResive partner.8200 County Road 116 p p Corcoran, MN 55340 Exceptional outcomes. Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0043 Wessel Property Feasibility Study Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 100 Transportation Transportation Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Grosser, Kellen 50 69.00 34.50 Terhaar, Edward 6.00 155.00 930.00 Totals 6.50 964.50 Total Labor 964.50 Unit Billing 00-WAI Vehicle Maple Plain 43.50 Phase Total 1,008.00 Phase 200 Sewer Sewer Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Bowers, Matthew 30 155.00 46.50 Totals 30 46.50 Total Labor 46.50 Phase Total 46.50 Phase 300 Water Water Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Bowers, Matthew 4.90 155.00 759.50 Sigtermans, Louis 1.00 95.00 95.00 Totals 5.90 854.50 Total Labor 854.50 Phase Total 854.50 Total Invoice Amount 1,909.00 Current Prior Total Billing Summary 1,909.00 0.00 1,909.00 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.comWebwww.wenck.com Nom Project B2294-0043 Wessel Property Feasibility Study Invoice 11900170 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the Page 2 invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice VA.1 February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900144 A1EF1CK Kevin Mattson City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Exceptional outcomes. Corcoran, MN 55340 Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0044 Transportation Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 100 MnDOT State Aid MnDOT State Aid Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Terhaar, Edward 11.50 155.00 1,782.50 Totals 11.50 1,782.50 Total Labor 1,782.50 Phase Total 1,782.50 Phase 300 City Traffic Items City Traffic Items Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Terhaar, Edward 5.50 155.00 852.50 Totals 5.50 852.50 Total Labor 852.50 Phase Total 852.50 Total Invoice Amount 2,635.00 Current Prior Total Billing Summary 2,635.00 0.00 2,635.00 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice AV vAiv February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900147 WENCK Kevin Mattson City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Exceptional outcomes. Corcoran, MN 55340 Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0045 Stormwater Professional Services Through January 31. 2019 Phase 100 General General Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Grosser, Kellen 50 69.00 34.50 Nalven, Sarah 3.10 98.00 303.80 Nelson, Susan 5.00 80.00 400.00 Shoemaker,Todd 90 155.00 139.50 Torve, Kent 80 132.00 105.60 Totals 10.30 983.40 i Total Labor 983.40 k I. Phase Total 983.40 Phase 300 MS4 MS4 Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Nalven, Sarah 9.10 98.00 891.80 Totals 9.10 891.80 Total Labor 891.80 Phase Total 891.80 Total Invoice Amount 1,875.20` Current Prior Total Billing Summary 1,875.20 0.00 1,875.20 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249-Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com r rrrrrrr Invoice VA. February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900152 I'1E11CK Kevin Mattson City of Corcoran, MN Responsive partner. 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Exceptional outcomes. Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0047 Sewer Utility Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 100 Field Inspection Field Inspection Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Butler,Samuel 1.00 87.00 87.00 Wyers, Nicholas 5.60 98.00 548.80 Totals 6.60 635.80 Total Labor 635.80 Phase Total 635.80 Total Invoice Amount 635.80 4- 146:41(541b Current Prior Total Billing Summary 635.80 0.00 635.80 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249-Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com Invoice V V vAlkv February 5, 2019 Invoice No: 11900153 i'1EICK Kevin Mattson City of Corcoran, MN 8200 County Road 116 Responsive partner. Corcoran, MN 55340 Exceptional outcomes. Project Manager Kent Torve Project B2294-0048 Water Utility Professional Services Through January 31, 2019 Phase 100 Field Inspection Field Inspection Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Grosser, Kellen 50 69.00 34.50 Wyers, Nicholas 3.00 98.00 294.00 Totals 3.50 328.50 Total Labor 328.50 l*60 1 Phase Total 328.50 byAV Phase 300 NE Water Supply NE Water Supply Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Bowers, Matthew 23.20 155.00 3,596.00 Madejczyk,Jeffrey 30 114.00 34.20 Torve, Kent 7.80 132.00 1,029.60 Totals 31.30 4,659.80 Total Labor 4,659.80 Phase Total 4,659.80 Total Invoice Amount 4,98 ,30 13. , Current Prior Total Billing Summary 4,988.30 0.00 4,988.30 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Subject to 1-1/2% 18%Annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 -Wenck Associates, Inc.-1800 Pioneer Creek Center PO Box 249- Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free:800-472-2232 Main:763-479-4200 E-mail:accounting @wenck.com Web www.wenck.com 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform D ATE: February 21, 2019 for the February 28, 2019 City Council Meeting RE: Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) for “Ravinia 11th Addition” (PID 36-119-23-44-0012) (City File 18-040) 60-DAY REVIEW: March 3, 2019 1.Application Request Lennar has submitted a request for a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD for “Ravinia 11th Addition” a development of 15 homes on 5.59 acres. 2.Planning Commission Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing at their regularly scheduled February 7, 2019 meeting. One person spoke during the public hearing. Commissioners voted 3-0 to recommend approval. 3.Context Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City must deny the rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving PUDs. A PUD must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community and surrounding area. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. Background Agenda Item: 8a. Ravinia 11th RZ, PP and PUD (city file 18-040) 2 February 28, 2019 City Council reviewed a sketch plan of the development on November 21, 2016. The Council identified several concerns that they asked the applicant to address, but was generally supportive of the concept. Zoning and Land Use The site is guided Low Density Residential, which is planned to be developed at 3-5 units per acre. The net post-density of this project is 3.21 units per acre. The site is zoned RSF-2 (Single Family Residential 2). Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties to the south and west are guided Low Density Residential and zoned RSF-2 (Single Family Residential 2). The property to the north is guided Low Density Residential, zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development) and is part of the Ravinia PUD by Lennar. The property to the east is in Maple Grove and is currently residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a low-quality wetland on the west part of the property. Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission has reviewed and approved the wetland delineation for the site. No wetland impacts are proposed. 4. Analysis of Request Rezoning The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from RSF-2 to PUD. The rezoning would allow the applicant flexibility to develop “Discovery” style single family housing on smaller lots than are typically allowed by the code. Section 1070.010, Subd. 2 provides four evaluation criteria for the Planning Commission to consider. The applicant’s plan meets these criteria as follows: A. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. Rezoning to a PUD will allow the property to be developed while maintaining the natural features on the various portions of the site. B. The proposed action meets the purpose and intent of this Ordinance or, in the case of a map amendment, it meets the purpose and intent of the individual district. The proposed action meets the purpose and intent of this Ordinance or, in the case of a map amendment, it meets the purpose and intent of the individual district and of the PUD District, Ravinia 11th RZ, PP and PUD (city file 18-040) 3 February 28, 2019 which allows the City to grant flexibility for setbacks, lot size and other elements of the Zoning Ordinance in exchange for a higher quality development. It allows the developer to include this property in the Ravinia development. C. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. Future public improvements are planned and the developer will be responsible for paying for improvements in accordance with the city assessment policy in place at the time of the improvements. D. There is an adequate buffer or transition provided between potentially incompatible districts. The surrounding districts are all used and guided for single family residential and are compatible with the single-family development. The property to the north is platted as Ravinia 6th Addition and this would bring this property into that development. According to Section 1040.140 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission and City Council must make several findings prior to approval of a preliminary development plan. The proposed PUD complies with the standards as follows: A. The planned development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The planned development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan if the Comprehensive Plan is approved. B. The planned development is not in conflict with the intent of the underlying zoning district. The planned development is not in conflict with the intent of the underlying zoning district. The PUD will allow the property owner to maximize the number of single family lots while minimizing impacts to the wetlands and natural features on the site. It would also allow the developer to expand the Ravinia development by adding this property. C. The planned development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The planned development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the City’s Zoning Ordinance. D. The planned development or unit thereof is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and/or operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other subsequent unit or phase. The planned development is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other subsequent unit or phase. However, the PUD will allow Lennar to add this parcel to the Ravinia development. Ravinia 11th RZ, PP and PUD (city file 18-040) 4 February 28, 2019 E. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. F. The planned development will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. The planned development will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. G. The quality of the building and site design proposed by the PUD plan shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, shall demonstrate higher standards, more efficient and effective uses of streets, utilities and public facilities, it shall maintain and enhance any natural resources within the development, and create a public benefit that is greater than what would be achieved through the strict application of the primary zoning regulations. The development will provide high quality homes, decorative street lights and preserve the wetlands on the site. These homes help diversify the housing available for residents that want to stay in Corcoran. Preliminary Plat The applicant is proposing a preliminary plat with 15 single family home lots. The proposed plat is consistent with the PUD standards for previous Ravinia phases. If this subdivision is approved, it would bring the total number of platted lots to 354 of 472 approved: • Phase 1 = 38 Units • Phase 2 = 36 units • Phase 3 = 27 units • Phase 4 = 44 units • Phase 5 = 47 units • Phase 6 = 23 units • Phase 7 = 29 units • Phase 8 = 20 units* • Phase 9 = 49 units • Phase 10 = 26 units • Phase 11 = 15 units** Total Units = 354 units (75% of the approved lots) *The Ravinia 8th Addition added land and units to the Ravinia project and the total increased from 437 to 457 units and 268.07 gross acres to 274.07 gross acres. Ravinia 11th RZ, PP and PUD (city file 18-040) 5 February 28, 2019 **The Ravinia 11th Addition added land and units to the Ravinia project and the total increased from 457 to 472 units and 274.07 gross acres to 279.68 gross acres. Lot Standards The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility for lot area, lot width, side, rear setbacks and separation between structures. Variation in lot size is a result of the wetlands on site and the design of the site aims to reduce impacts to the natural features of the site. The following table shows the lot dimensions required in the RSF-2 District and the lot dimensions proposed in the PUD. Required Proposed Ravinia 8th Addition Minimum Lot Area 11,000 square feet 7,776 square feet 7,632 square feet Minimum lot width 80 feet 55 feet 55 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet NA NA Front, From all other streets 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 15 feet NA NA Side (living) 10 feet 5 feet 5 feet Side (garage)** 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Rear 30 feet 25 feet 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet Unknown 35 feet *Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever and A Minor Expander Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. **Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 feet. Product Type Lennar will be using their Discovery series which is a smaller home (2,100 – 2,600 sq. ft.) than some of the products currently offered in Ravinia and will have 2-car garages. The target market for these homes is young families. The homes will be part of the master association but will not have the association maintained components that are planned in the villas. Architecture Each house plan will be reviewed by the City prior to building permit to ensure that the ordinance standards as modified by the PUD are met. The City must review the final proposed home designs to make sure that the homes are compatible with the standards of the Zoning Ordinance for both design and materials. It is staff’s understanding that the homes will be similar to the homes proposed in Ravinia 4th and 8th Addition. Section 1040.040, Subd. 8, D. of the Zoning Ordinance provides residential architectural standards and the applicant will need to show compliance with the final building plans. Ravinia 11th RZ, PP and PUD (city file 18-040) 6 February 28, 2019 Access/Streets The new development would be served by construction of new public streets, Larkspur Lane and Road 2. Road 2 will be named in compliance with the City’s naming policy. These streets have a 50-foot right-of-way and will be stubbed to the property line so that they can be extended to the adjacent properties in the future. This is consistent with City Engineering standards for residential streets and will allow parking on one side of these local streets. Larkspur Lane will have a temporary cul de sac for public safety and public works turnarounds, with Road 2 utilizing a temporary turnaround. The lot/outlot with turnarounds are unbuildable, as the buildable area is used for these turnarounds. The temporary turnarounds will be removed when the streets are extended. At that time Lot 1, Block 3 would be buildable and Outlot B will remain unbuildable. Staff has included a condition that the temporary cul de sac easement be provided for city review and approval prior to recording with the final plat. The City Engineer’s memo dated January 30, 2019 includes several conditions that must be addressed prior to submittal of the final plans. These have been included as conditions of approval. Street Names The plans show street names that are placeholders. Section 945.020, Subd. 13 gives the City the authority to designate street names designated by the City street naming system. Staff has included a condition that the applicant work with City staff to provide street names that are consistent with the “Street Name and Address System Policy.” Street Lights The applicant has not submitted street lighting details. Staff recommends that the street lighting approved for previous Ravinia phases be provided in this development. This is consistent with Section 945.020, Subd. 17, which requires ornamental poles. A uniform style of light fixture should be used throughout the site and the applicant will be required to indicate which style will be used in their final development plan application. Parking Guest parking is not required for single family homes. Section 1060.060 of the ordinance requires a single stall garage for single family homes. The proposed homes have two-car garages. This complies with ordinance requirements. Additionally, parking will be allowed on the sidewalk side of the new public street. Landscaping Section 1070 of the Zoning Ordinance requires one overstory tree per dwelling unit. The applicant’s plans 42 trees where 15 are required for the residential lots. 21 of the trees are planted at the edge of the front drainage and utility easement and are evenly spaced along the Ravinia 11th RZ, PP and PUD (city file 18-040) 7 February 28, 2019 residential street to create an attractive streetscape with a mix of Princeton Elm and Autumn Blaze Maple. The remaining 21 trees are planted in the rear yard of Lots 5-7 adjacent to County Road 101 to provide screening from the County Road. The screening contains a mix of Prairie Rose Crab, Colorado Green Spruce and White Pine. Wetlands A wetland delineation was approved by ECWMC on July 10, 2017. Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance provides standards for wetlands. The wetland on-site is defined as a low-quality wetland on site, which requires a 15-foot average wetland buffer and a 15-foot buffer setback. Wetland buffers, setbacks, and buffer monuments are required to be installed when the property is platted. Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 requires wetland buffer monuments to be placed at 1) Each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer; 2) where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer; and must have 3) a maximum spacing of 200 feet of wetland edge. Monuments are required around the entire perimeter of the wetlands. Wetland buffer monuments must be installed prior to issuance of a building permit. Where the City and ECWMC differ in standards, the applicant shall comply with the more restrictive standard. Section 1050.10, Subd. 5 requires that buffers around wetlands be planted with vegetation in accordance with Section 1050.10, Subd. 8, Buffer Strip Vegetation Performance Standards. Staff has included a condition that will require the applicant update the landscape plan to comply with these standards. Utilities Municipal sewer and water are available to the site. As noted in the attached Engineer’s memo, sanitary sewer and water will be extended from the Ravinia property to the site. All utility facilities, including but not limited to telephone, CATV, natural gas and electric power, shall be located underground. Storm Water Management The proposed ponding must provide treatment and rate control. The developer may not increase the rate of runoff onto other properties and existing drainage through the site must be maintained. The developer’s plan is generally in compliance with these regulations. The City and the watershed will both review the grading plans for compliance with the applicable regulations. The applicant will need to work with the City Engineer to address comments in the January 30, 2019 memo. Mail Delivery One centralized mailbox location should be shown on the landscape plans. The location of mailboxes must be approved by the US Postal Service. The applicant will need to provide proof of the approved location to the City. Sidewalks Ravinia 11th RZ, PP and PUD (city file 18-040) 8 February 28, 2019 The applicant shows five-foot sidewalks on one side of the street in the proposed plans as required by ordinance. Park Dedication Requirements Under the current ordinance, park dedication of land is required at 15% of the net pre-development area for residential land. If the City determines that land is not needed in the area of a proposed subdivision, a cash fee in lieu of land dedication may be required. For residential developments, the cash in lieu of land fee has been calculated based on the per capita share of park system costs at $3,970 per single family unit (15 x $3,970 = $59,550). The Comprehensive Plan shows an on-road trail on County Road 101. This trail would be built when County Road 101 is improved, but the applicant must show on the how this trail will be accommodated. Conclusion The staff report noted the outstanding issues that must be addressed and we have included conditions in the attached resolutions to address these issues. The applicant has requested PUD flexibility for: a. Lot size b. Lot width c. Setbacks The applicant has not clearly articulated what specific benefits that the PUD will offer the city, however, staff notes the following: 1. The plan shows a landscaped streetscape with evenly spaced trees and screening from County Road 101. 2. The property would be an expansion of the Ravinia development, which exceeded park dedication requirements as part of the original approval and additional park dedication (cash in lieu of land) would be acquired with this project. 5. Recommendation Move to recommend approval of the following: 1. Ordinance 2019-388 approving Rezoning from RSF-2 to PUD 2. Resolution 2019-10 approving Findings of Fact for Rezoning 3. Resolution 2019-09 approving Preliminary PUD Development Plan 4. Resolution 2019-08 approving Preliminary Plat Ravinia 11th RZ, PP and PUD (city file 18-040) 9 February 28, 2019 Attachments a. Ordinance 2019-388 approving Rezoning from RSF-2 to PUD b. Resolution 2019-10 approving Findings of Fact for Rezoning c. Resolution 2019-09 approving Preliminary PUD Development Plan d. Resolution 2019-08 approving Preliminary Plat e. Hennepin County Aerial f. Engineer’s Memo dated January 30, 2019 g. Applicant’s narrative submitted December 19, 2018 h. Plat submitted December 19, 2018 i. Civil Plans submitted December 19, 2018 j. Landscape Plans submitted December 19, 2019 City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2019-388 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT 6351 COUNTY ROAD 101 (PID 36-119-23-44- 0012) (CITY FILE 18-040) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Corcoran Zoning Map from Single Family Residential 2 (RSF-2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), legally described as follows: The East 780 feet of the part of the Southeasterly ¼ of the Southeasterly ¼ of Section 36, Township 119, North Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Northerly of the South 1,010.00 feet, Hennepin County Minnesota. Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon adoption of the resolution approving the final PUD development plan for this project. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-10 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6351 COUNTY ROAD 101 (PID 36-119-23-44-0012) (CITY FILE 18-040) WHEREAS, U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) (“the applicant”) has requested approval to rezoning land on a single parcel totaling 5.59 acres legally described as follows: The East 780 feet of the part of the Southeasterly ¼ of the Southeasterly ¼ of Section 36, Township 119, North Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Northerly of the South 1,010.00 feet, Hennepin County Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcels from Single Family Residential 2 (RSF-2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the request of U.S. Home Corporation for the reclassification of the property, based on the following findings and conditions: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. Rezoning to a PUD will allow the property to be developed while maintaining the natural features of the site. 2. The proposed action meets the purpose and intent of this Ordinance or, in the case of a map amendment, it meets the purpose and intent of the individual district and of the PUD District, which allows the City to grant flexibility for setbacks, lot size and other elements of the Zoning Ordinance in exchange for a higher quality development. It allows the developer to include this property in the Ravinia development. 3. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. Future public improvements are planned and the developer will be responsible for paying for improvements in accordance with development agreement. 4. The surrounding districts are all used and guided for single family residential and are compatible with the single-family development. The property to the north is platted as Ravinia 6th Addition and this would bring this property into that development. 5. The development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. The PUD will allow the property owner to maximize the number of single-family lots while minimizing impacts to the wetlands and natural features on the site. It would also allow City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-10 Page 2 of 2 the developer to expand the Ravinia development by adding this property. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer will provide additional landscaping to buffer the homes adjacent to County Road 101. 6. The planned development is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other subsequent unit or phase. However, the PUD will allow Lennar to add this parcel to the Ravinia development. 7. The quality of the site design proposed by the PUD shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, install and provide more efficient use of streets, utilities and public facilities than may otherwise be expected and create public benefit that is greater than would otherwise be achieved due to the construction and financing of all related infrastructure improvements. The development will meet the City’s density goals while preserving high quality natural resources, providing amenities and high-quality architecture. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-08 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR “RAVINIA 11TH ADDITION” AT 6351 COUNTY ROAD 101 (CITY FILE 18-040) WHEREAS, U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a final plat for “Ravinia 11th Addition” for 15 lots and 2 outlots on property legally described as follows: The East 780 feet of the part of the Southeasterly ¼ of the Southeasterly ¼ of Section 36, Township 119, North Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Northerly of the South 1,010.00 feet, Hennepin County Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to create 15 lots and 2 outlots for Ravinia 11th Addition, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on December 18, 2018, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the preliminary PUD development plan for Ravinia 11th Addition. The developer shall comply with all conditions of preliminary PUD development plan approval (Resolution 2019-09). 3. Park dedication is due as required by the PUD approvals, prior to release of the final plat for recording. 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo, dated January 30, 2019. 5. There is a public driveway agreement easement located on the south side of the property that will need to be vacated prior to approval of the final plat. 6. The following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: a. The applicant must file the final plat at Hennepin County within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. b. All drainage and utility easements shall be staked, surveyed and properly recorded prior to beginning any work on site. c. Wetland buffer monument signs must be purchased from the City and installed by the applicant. City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-08 Page 2 of 2 d. The applicant must record the approving resolutions and associated documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. e. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plan drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. 7. The following conditions be met prior to release of remaining escrow: a. Lot corner monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. A financial guarantee shall be required to ensure installation per city requirements. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-09 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMINARY PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR “RAVINIA 11TH ADDITION” FOR PROPERTY AT 6351 COUNTY ROAD 101 (CITY FILE 18-040) WHEREAS, U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a preliminary PUD (planned unit development) plan for “Ravinia 11th Addition” for 15 lots on property legally described as: The East 780 feet of the part of the Southeasterly ¼ of the Southeasterly ¼ of Section 36, Township 119, North Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Northerly of the South 1,010.00 feet, Hennepin County Minnesota WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by U.S. Home Corporation for a preliminary PUD development plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary PUD development plan is approved to create 15 lots and two outlots for Ravinia 11th Addition on 5.59 acres, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on December 18, 2018, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning and preliminary plat. 3. Park dedication shall be cash in lieu of land for the 15 new lots. The park dedication fee is subject to the fee schedule in place at the time the final plat is released for filing. 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo, dated January 30, 2019. 5. The application is subject to the review and approval by Hennepin County. The applicant shall comply with any conditions of approval from the County. 6. The preliminary PUD development plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 7. The plans must be revised to show driveway locations as part of the final PUD development application. City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-09 Page 2 of 4 8. All platted residential lots shall comply with the following: Single Family Minimum Lot Area 7,776 square feet Minimum Lot Width 55 feet Front, From County Road 101* 100 feet Front, From all other streets 20 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 15 feet Side 5 feet Rear 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 9. All garages must have a minimum 22-foot wide parking area between the garage and right-of-way that does not overlap into sidewalks, drives or streets. 10. The plans must be revised to show the planned on-road trail on County Road 101 can be accommodated. 11. The lot/outlot with turnarounds are unbuildable, as the buildable area is used for these turnarounds. The temporary turnarounds will be removed when the streets are extended. At that time Lot 1, Block 3 would be buildable and Outlot B will remain unbuildable Architectural and Design standards 12. PUD flexibility is provided to allow the face of the garage to exceed 55% of the building face. In exchange for this flexibility: a. Garage door colors shall be compatible with the building colors. b. Architectural elements shall be added above the garage to de-emphasize the garage doors. c. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior of the home. 13. The approved PUD standards are hereby modified to specifically allow flexibility from the Zoning Ordinance requirement that “Each elevation facing a street or park shall have a minimum of 50% comprised on natural material consisting of brick, stone, stucco, hardi- board, redwood, cedar or other similar materials. A minimum of two different materials is required, except that brick may be used on the entire elevation.” a. Homes shall be allowed to have vinyl siding on the front elevation. b. The front elevation shall have a minimum of two different materials, which may include vinyl and stone/brick. c. A variety of vinyl siding styles are encouraged on all elevations (lap siding, board and batten, shake, etc.). 14. The plans show centralized mailbox locations. These mailbox locations shall be approved by the US Postal Service and proof of the approved locations provided to the City, prior to release of the final plat. City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-09 Page 3 of 4 Landscaping and Lighting 15. Plans shall be revised to show proposed street lighting. 16. No sub-neighborhood signage is requested or approved in this phase. 17. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. a. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. b. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. c. Monuments and signs shall be installed prior to approval of the building permit. Streets, Parking and Utilities 18. The development shall comply with the City’s requirements regarding fire access, fire protection and fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, fire department connections and fire lane signage. 19. A temporary cul-de-sac easement shall be submitted with final PUD development plan for review and approval by the City. 20. Street names shall be revised to comply with the city naming policy. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: 1. The applicant must record the approving resolutions and associated documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 2. The applicant shall provide proof of recording the final plat and related documents at Hennepin County. 3. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plan drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-09 Page 4 of 4 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Henn e p in Co unty Prop erty Map Da te : 1/3 0/2019 Com ments: 1 inc h = 8 00 feet PAR C EL ID: 36 11923440012 OWN ER N AME : J O Nic ho ls & D L Nichols PAR C EL AD DR E SS: 6 351 C o R d No 101, Corcoran MN 55340 PAR C EL AR EA: 5.2 4 ac re s , 228,073 sq ft A-T-B: Ab s trac t SAL E PR ICE: $52,000 SAL E D ATA: 09/1988 SAL E C OD E: Wa rranty Deed ASSESS ED 2 017 , PAYABLE 2018 PR OPERT Y TYPE: Res idential H OM ESTEAD : Homes tead M AR KET VA L UE: $465,000 TAX TO TAL: $6,740.38 ASSESS ED 2 018 , PAYABLE 2019 PRO PER TY TYPE : Residential HO MESTEAD: Homestead MARKE T VALU E: $489,000 This dat a (i) is fur nished 'AS IS' wit h no repres ent at ion as to com pletenes s or acc ura cy; (ii) is furnis hed with no war rant y of an y k ind; an d (i ii) is not s uit able for lega l, engi neering or s urv ey ing purposes . Hen nepin C ounty s hall not be liable f or any dam age, in jury o r los s r esu lting f rom t his data. CO PYRIG HT © HENNEPIN CO UN TY 2 0 19 Technical Memo Wenck | Colorado | Georgia | Minnesota | North Dakota | Wyoming Toll Free 800-472-2232 Web wenck.com To: Kevin Mattson, PE, Director of Public Works From: Kent Torve, P.E. Nicholas Wyers Rowdy Schmidt Date: January 30th, 2019 Subject: Ravinia – 11th Addition Plan Review Lennar submitted plans for the Ravinia development 11th Addition for City of Corcoran review. Plans dated September 19th, 2018 have been received January 2nd, 2019 for the proposed Ravinia development. The following comments are regarding the plans submitted and should be considered and addressed. 1.0 Transportation 1.1 Include pedestrian ramp details . 1.2 45’ radius required on temporary cul-de-sac on Larkspur Lane. 1.3 Curb to be added to the south end of Larkspur Lane and Road 2 to prevent water from spilling over onto neighboring property. 1.4 Due to curve on Road 2, City recommends extending temporary turn around further into Outlot B. Shift temporary turn around to avoid CBMH 4. Coordinate with Engineer. 1.5 Update street profiles to provide elevations of existing and proposed. 2.0 Trails 2.1 Identify Hennepin County trail needs on plans along CSAH 101. 3.0 Sewer 3.1 Sewer services appear to end at the D/U easement line, update to show using current standards of 1’ within the R/W. 3.2 Lot 1 Block 3 does not have sewer and water services. Verify with City whether it should be considered an Outlot. 3.3 Verify depth of Lot 6 Block 1 sewer service with watermain crossing. 4.0 Water 4.1 Lower watermain by MH 3 to avoid high point. 4.2 Water service to Lot 1 Block 3. 4.3 Install 8” valve north of temporary hydrant on Larkspur Lane. 4.4 Move hydrant on Road 2 to the south end of Road 2 for flushing purposes. Engineer’s Memo January 30, 2018 2 \\wenck.local\wenckspace\Vol1\2294-Corcoran\17-Lennar\Phase 11\Plan Review\Submittal 1_2019_0102\_Wenck Review\2019-0123 Plan Reivew_Phase 11 Review 1.docx 5.0 Grading and Stormwater Storm Sewer 5.1 Provide outlet control structure detail for storm structure 16. 5.2 Provide profile for storm structure 16 to flared end section 15. 5.3 Provide storm sewer structure table. 5.4 Upon evaluation of existing conditions of flared end section under CSAH 101, an outlet control structure may be required. 5.5 Revise dual pipes that serve as primary outlet and EOF for Wetland 1. 5.5.1 Invert elevations do not match between plans and HydroCAD. 5.5.2 HWL does not match between plans and HydroCAD. 5.5.3 As currently modeled, the Wetland 1 HWL (884.6) is greater than the secondary pipe outlet invert, which then “shifts” the EOF from the secondary pipe to Larkspur Lane. If this secondary pipe is to convey flow for the 100-year event, the adjacent low openings must be increased further than noted in item 5.16 of this memo. Stormwater Model 5.6 Lower CNs one HSG category due to mass grading soil compaction unless area is to remain undisturbed. 5.7 Revise HydroCAD model or plans to reflect accurate HWLs for Wetland 3 and Filtration Basin. Stormwater Plan 5.8 Provide forebay in filtration basin sized to 10% of water quality volume. 5.9 Include detail of filtration basin cross-section. Grading 5.10 Fencing required on retaining walls per City permit. 5.11 City has concerns with slope at STA 9+00 at the end of Larkspur Lane. Please verify maximum of 3:1 slope. Retaining wall and fence may be required. 5.12 City has concerns with location of maintenance access. Coordinate with City staff. Basin access shows overhead utility pole in the way. Show profile of basin maintenance access. 5.13 Provide permanently stabilized EOF per City Detail for filtration basin at 980.0. 5.14 Locate Wetland 2 EOF. 5.15 Rear yard draintile, or swale needed on Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 (update easements). 5.16 Revise low opening on the following lots to meet City freeboard requirements. HWL according to HydroCAD model for Wetland 1 is 984.6. As noted in item 5.5.3, it is not clear if EOF is secondary pipe or at Larkspur Lane. 5.16.1 Lot 1 Block 3, low opening 986.3 5.16.2 Lot 2 Block 3, low opening 985.0 Engineer’s Memo January 30, 2018 3 \\wenck.local\wenckspace\Vol1\2294-Corcoran\17-Lennar\Phase 11\Plan Review\Submittal 1_2019_0102\_Wenck Review\2019-0123 Plan Reivew_Phase 11 Review 1.docx 5.16.3 Lot 3 Block 3, low opening 986.3 5.17 Provide additional details on retaining wall material. 5.18 Provide encroachment agreement on retaining walls inside D/U easement. 6.0 Erosion Control 6.1 City of Corcoran is an MS4 city and site visits to be conducted weekly. 7.0 General 7.1 Make pond and wetland numbering consistent with prior submittals . 7.1.1 Wetland #15 was the largest number from prior submittal, rename wetland #1 to be Wetland #16 and Wetland #2 to be Wetland #17. 7.1.2 Wetland #3 to be renamed Wetland #18. 7.1.3 Wetland #15 was the largest number from prior submittal, rename wetland #2 to be Wetland #17. 7.1.4 Largest pond number is number 20. Rename filtration basin to be consistent with prior submittals. 7.2 Add street lighting plan. 7.3 Vacate existing driveway agreement along southern property line. 7.4 Provide ghost plat information for properties to the south to verify street alignment and utility availability. Coordinate with Engineer. 7.5 City permit required for demolition of existing homestead. 7.6 Verify irrigation in boulevards is the responsibility of the home owner. 7.7 Provide soil boring information at STA 8+50 on Larkspur Lane since it is between two wetlands. Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 Legend ennepin oun y a H ura 2 Foot Elevation Contours Date: 1/2/2019 Index µ -r r Intermediate 1 t . + r' y 4 kp fi Wetlands Potential Wetland - HCWI „�` �• of � ICJ. a _ y �• .. - < .� z . r_ t ti Probable Wetland - HCWI lo •_' -� r s• ? , •1 1p 1 ,• ' � 1 1 e .+. ' �11 � ��i '�' /r ` NF1} a _ ta. ' � t • ��� �. .'� y - . ► " ,. �•f - -- j .'�, y r - - _ -. t .► Probable Wetland - NWI iN -'tea � t ' � `,'M. �` R - a• ' � '• �.. ��� - Yf� # 9 - _ i _ fi ,,' • ._.. r La left - pr�� ,►� �,`:. 1 �•�, � y - -- i :.�• � = ems y rip . -+� � � y .s - � � #�� it �. • F ° � '1`"- `- tee, "FF �'� ►►.. • � i� v •-- �� - y - , ti � ,•.��y; If.,•,1 r. f ! _ - _- � ! - fy� rtl� r y � �. • ��� -. _ �� n� ' � � - - ; + L _ _ - ti. . yir - -. _ _ ate._ c , .4 y+r • J IwAL It Gw ow is } • l K � " - � ' C �' _ 1�... _�„ 1fr- _ + f �,1 . ' y • + + ray; � # �4- j' - _ _ �A • � � � ,,. ' - _ .. �- =� + ice« � � F ' ' ' _ �'�` _--•Y k o ♦,, .�_ .�+ �} ♦ S. • 1.71 � Ok^� r Y „ rtt_ d �' ''♦`°"` _ - �} 1 ` X16 �r r _ r 4 _ f _ • - ' `i, P I D: 3611923440014 e� dress: 19200 HACKAMORE RD, F� IM r �`�. _ _ CORCORAN ,�,.� - .•� y_� =_-. ;'� -.�� - Owner Name: H CANDERSON LLC r .1? i , Acres 6.85 Ar aim; 001c, - _ F F �, ( '��.c � - as! � V t � t _ -_��: _ ,�+ •e �i _� -? i ti's ,� _ r •� _ \ } �. is � _ � - r �l :. t / e ' +� t • i ' - - _- - _ - �,• +1 ` i S• L t♦� O. � � %fills; � ' '�-�� -w^ , -• 1v' _ ��I ` _~` -ati 1. � ,tor, C 1 f �� ^•at. - _ _ ._ss -_•+►. -R- j- .,l 7i- - f r �� �•t'' , °� '�"' ! . I it ''%' ,+ -e� -a . _ ',�. \I .7i ! f = Ik 1 inch 4� 00 feet WK 1 R R � t � •, 1 _ -_ - - _ - >� � �1�' h'r , >• • � � � � 1 +n r 11 i} s o'•y. � t M �� ,F Q / },1 .I!` � '� a 1�, ,.�`> Y `` l l !. -ar•� � - S This data (i) is furnished AS IS with no representation as to '.°. . ` � i' - _ .-�•; ,� � ��r �;.� r t . *�: � = _ completeness oraccuracy; (i) is furnished with no warranty of I R M any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying R P �P Y not be liable for any damage, ur oses. Hen in Count shall M ! I `• e i ' •` � fig. ig. s 1tis� � � "1Rt ,�� �J� j�a � � '`� ' �s ,f� ~: i ,, Al ur or loss resulting from this data. ♦ 6'+.'•M' � ^ � .iti t.� {� is .� ,6 � �' � � 1 1•!1 �... , de :, ?'f 1 L F 1_. ~< F,i ��1 CO PYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019 'ir H Le end enne in 2 Foot Elevation Contours Date: 1/2/2019 Index °as t ' '•t��`, �' + r r t y r , rp I r.N - ! Intermediate y ,� ''i ti, ; r; .. °I : ' 1 1 - - `• _ - '• ' _tee ' u ! -� - -� - Ile t � ! ' r i � • 1 t , � � F y , ! n _ - , , � - I A I - - s .t _ li - I - r- �.,�'�1`� I ♦ ,/`' a� I it �'�IC ` A ® n Wetlands Potential Wetland - HCWI .. - - A. 1 � - - ! _ _ _ - ,fb `, � j 1 .. ,� i Y 1 �Y� .> i � � 1 1 iJt� � � ' � h I ^ _ - _ _ - - ! •i � 1 Y J „nt' - 1, ,^ r (t ' °• , - i ! Y, y, pl 1 t M + - �C��••� I — - h I .L �� Probable Wetland - HCWI `! �! _ - _ jt ?' '�.`n • - . , ,' i i r " , � " � II ; l Y,• 1 �_ - ' y t _ r .. �► - - �' t� � r , ' ��' i,' ; 1•► I `�% ' j' 'F I 1 1 _ _ , Probable Wetland - NM jet ie� �" i, � I - ' � yy _ A I - - ” is - °°v,.., -.� -�` ..' I �, ► - � , � = s - _ � _ _ = -- 4 ' Wool AAW _ I •� - c' 4F 1 , lol Illool _. � -- ti - f'�� •- - _ z . -- - _ - _ _ _ -- _ ',�^ , -,t.` r• yam- � , ,,`� I 'f��� .. _ -- _ -s - .� -- i � !. rte. + °) - - '•` i ' , ,�r r ,�!•1, _ ' yam, - e � - -��.!� y� ++ j` 1, � I •'• ! . r ! � Ifw■ - • ten._• ' i, VIC �• " -- f- p "' ,1 ', d - _� • �', { !A - IjI � _ ,nA'� -. r' a - _ -I- - - ••.f[; .. .,. � l -, ���, - P sl � ' i s= -�- _ i !! ,. ,: ^__•i� r yam(,, ,' , ..•'°.. - . - _ .. •. _ :,� ` +w... 1 ,'� - ,. - - - _ _ � 1 e `A <, , _ - - _ � i 11e ., I I 1 ,,, �,'�• -y fff i � 'I 'Y i -' - _ _ - -_ -- - - _ -_ s jr -�,�� `- J' � ,', ` i',^ � ( P ,1' 1 !• Y i _ •' fit. `- s - ' ' � _ "�,, -� ` 1 -. _ - �r. 1i� - - `• -- it - ".�`' �._ _��• _' - �' j��� -Y - - ` _ -- �.y'���s_ �__ -- - - - _ ,/. r R - - a °� t Y� _ = r - � ` /fJ a• _ _ -�� - _ - t . __ ' i t f ' ' ! e � � ' - - _ ° a ' - { � i.I ��•_ - - --- i - _ / c � r r - _ - � ° 1. r `•_ � t, _. -- •" � _ 1 �i• - - s ��/r� I = Nri 7, � , 1 _' - 't `_ - — L ! _ -. Al �` '- '' ,�;i � . - - _ _ � � h_ _ --=.- . _ - „� - _ - 7 It• •, - ( _ r . - i � '. Mr ' t . I ,' ; e 1 - z • " . a - t � _ _ , i 3611923440009 '� - r '* r • t iy'` - Address: 19220 HACKAMORE RD, ''" ill►• �;:.- - _ _ _ IwE ! # i• •� _ _ = - - A "o„� - toek'r�Ot�►1��1'_ E I - _ yg. _ CORCORAN i �I i rc f � � ; "A- � • _a. � � �f 1� � '�4 �? Owner Name: GREGORY S & 47' t « . -- JACKiE A HOGLUND - � _ _ - •. • -- -_. _ - r E 1, i - _ - -.ate - -z - -- a.- - _ R. °. -�_ -_- _ '- a r F � 1 - - .: -n' - P - - � - �'_-.-- _ -- - - ~- Are .Q4 1 y _ .'• 'A , I. ; _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ tea_ _ `,. _ ,' - -� _ _ - ._ _ - Acres: 6 V _ _,." a'. _ - yy - - •�• ` 't ,�N��'1�r`, � "mss I '^ i °' - _•_`` __ "►" - i' � A - t -.a - -�,' - _� -• '. - r 1 - a w - .. 1 I ' -. ,. -_ _. - - ,. 5. . t i ! I^ ' •_ _ � I�� e e Y C ®rnr�aents. •; I , � , I 1�{ � - _. _ _ 1 � `�..� - - '"tip• •.,. _ 1 ♦ r-r 1 _. - f ii '' s I,� -' I ' . II �, -_ 1,,, Flo - - - - i � I � "• - I , r / _ - - ',{ -- � •�' - r- , - � . .. e e ♦ •/ - /1/ - _ ! ! _ y�• �` . 1 inch — 400 feet ! II Y •o, P ' _ j r ' - 1. _ 'r 11 �,Ar' . fa _ r. Y 1, O u vr. ° v f ..' I - •L ' , ry , n , ,. f � Il i i p�l . �'F p '` `�' eM N _ A , � •f 1 l i^ 1 I - I ' �a d1 1. A /,`"� •� +i i °T. `i - c`,- ! �' ' f. _ r _ 'This data (i) is fumished 'AS IS' with no representafion as to , y I � - ;' • ! r- r � ,R r +." tl � r•,� - -_ . � + '� . ; I 'IU - _ _- - i r l 1 i 1 ' , < < - '��`, completeness oraccuracy; (o) is furnished with no warrantyof �__ __��y t h F = ! r +• _ - —' ! ``'�� - 'iF;�° I -' any kind; and (ii) is notsuitabie for legal, engineering or surveying I i R ,�,A 1 1 ! - �„ ,.. ►` I i purposes_ Hennepin County shall not be liable for anydamage, in • ury or I oss re sul 6 ng from thi s data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019 i 'a - I _ ' •+�. i _ -- �'' 1 1ti I.YL '. 1 ' i I _i i l i -e i 1, e , 4 , , !y �, / _ '7+_.'_�� _ f Z _ i1 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: JP Mansolf through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: February 20, 2019 for the February 28, 2019 City Council Meeting RE: 2040 Comprehensive Plan (city file no. 17-001) 1.Background: The Comprehensive Plan is the vision for development in Corcoran. Although it is a physical plan, it is a reflection of the community's social and economic values. These values are translated into the type of land use the City desires and programs regarding economic development, housing, parks, transportation and other key areas. In Minnesota, authority for land-use planning and regulation is vested primarily in local governments (townships, cities and counties). The Metropolitan Land Planning Act, a state law first passed in 1976 and amended several times since, requires local governments in the seven-county Twin Cities area to develop local comprehensive plans. The law requires the City to update the Comprehensive Plan every 10 years. This update was previously required to be adopted by December 31, 2018, however, due to the amount of modifications requested by the Metropolitan Council it was agreed that the City would make the requested changes and submit a revised plan in mid-2019. In 2017, the City initiated the planning process to update the 2030 Comprehensive Plan that was completed in 2011. It was the Council’s direction that no major policy changes were anticipated and this would be an update of the existing plan. In May of 2018, the City sent a draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council, adjacent communities and relevant agencies to receive comments and feedback on the draft plan. Those comments have been addressed and the modifications the Metropolitan Council requested have been made. 2.Plan Overview Key changes from the 2030 plan include: •The Comprehensive Plan update was designed to incorporate more graphics (maps, photos, table and charts) throughout the document to make it easier to read and understand. •The final document will have hyperlinks to make it easier for users to move through the document. •The implementation plan lists specific action items and their associated timing to implement the Comprehensive Plan. The Council should use these to identify priorities for the City. Agenda Item: ____ 8b. February 28, 2019 Chapter 1: Introduction and Community Background This chapter provides background on the legal requirements for communities within the seven- county metro area to produce a comprehensive plan every 10 years. The introduction also describes the City’s vision over the next 20 years and its setting in relation to the greater seven-county metro area. Chapter 2: Land Use Chapter 2 identifies the location and intensity of development within the City and establishes a framework in which that development may occur. This land use plan seeks to create the flexibility to respond to market conditions while guiding land uses that adhere to the community’s vision and guiding principles. Key changes from the 2030 plan include: • Land use designations will be updated to reflect the land use designations approved as part of the Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines adopted in 2016 (except as modified by transportation changes in the 2040 Transportation Chapter). • The Business Park designation near CR 30/CR 116 shifted west to the NE corner of CR 30/CR 116. • An additional 932 acres of land in southwest Corcoran was originally proposed to be added to MUSA to help facilitate extension of sewer services as part of the Loretto project. However, at the urging of the Metropolitan Council we have shown this area as a future MUSA expansion area. • Land behind the existing downtown industrial area was changed from residential to industrial to allow expansion of business in central Corcoran. • The Metropolitan Council reduced the City’s population forecasts by 35% from the 2030 estimates (from an estimated population of 17,600 to 11,400 in 2040). These new forecasts are used for planning purposes throughout the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. • Other land use modifications were made as directed by the Council or as determined necessary by staff and are shown on the attached exhibit. • The 2040 Staging Plan (Map 2-2) was modified to reflect the newest sanitary sewer plan. In most cases, the staging is similar to the 2030 plan. Chapter 3: Housing This chapter establishes plans and programs to meet the existing and projected housing needs in Corcoran. It guides the community’s integration of housing goals and policies into land use, infrastructure, community development, transportation, and natural resource decisions. Chapter 4: Economic Competitiveness The Economic Competitiveness chapter identifies strategies to increase commercial and industrial development in Corcoran. This section of the 2040 Plan recognizes the inherent link between commercial development and the availability of skilled and educated workers, affordable housing, developable land and infrastructure. February 28, 2019 Chapter 5: Parks and Trails Chapter 5 contains Corcoran’s plan to develop, maintain and grow the park and trail system while providing a benchmark from which to make decisions as investment opportunities arise. The City seeks to provide a parks, trails and open space system that will be an integral part of the community’s life. Key changes from the 2030 plan include: • The parks and trails plan was updated to reflect the changes approved as part of the Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines adopted in 2016 (except as modified by transportation changes in the 2040 Transportation Chapter). The Council directed staff to update the Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines to reflect the changes proposed in the 2040 Transportation Plan. • The text was modified to clarify that Community Parks include both Open Space/Natural Parks and Athletic Search Areas. The text also notes that a park may serve both community park and neighborhood park needs. A new Athletic Search Area was identified near Old Settlers Road. Several possible sites are identified but only one 20-100 acres site is needed to serve the community needs prior to 2040. • Planned regional park improvements were added to the plans. • The plans now show trails on all collector roads. These may be on-road or off-road trails and the final design will be determined when they are constructed with the road improvement projects. • Other minor trail realignments were mapped according to Commission direction. • The horse trail has been eliminated as recommended by the Parks and Trails Commission. • The plan reflects the acquisition of the Rockford School property and construction of Wildflower Park in Ravinia. Chapter 6: Transportation This chapter identifies existing and future transportation needs in Corcoran. It also identifies policies and planned actions to meet those transportation needs. The plan recognizes that coordination of infrastructure is critical to create a system that works to support the land uses both in and surrounding Corcoran. Key changes from the 2030 plan include: • County Road 50 alignment will not change as previously planned • County Road 10 alignment east of County Road 116 will not change as previously planned • Realignment of the Maple Hill/Larkin Road/ CR 10 intersection is planned Chapter 7: Wastewater The intent of this chapter is to describe Corcoran’s existing and proposed ultimate wastewater collection and disposal system and to demonstrate Corcoran’s conformance with Metropolitan Council wastewater system planning, providing specific information needed to meet the 2040 WRPP requirements. Key changes from the 2030 plan include: February 28, 2019 Northeast District. • The primary trunk sewer route extending into Corcoran from the northeast corner was shifted eastward based on the results of a feasibility study. • This pipe was also extended further south, all the way to the southwest corner of the Northeast District and into the northern part of the Southeast District, which eliminated the need for a future large lift station that was identified near City Hall in the 2030 Plan. This provides great operational cost savings and reliability. Southeast District. • A lift station was added to provide service to the Lennar Homes Development was required. • An interim lift station was added to provide service to Downtown Corcoran. This lift station can be eliminated after the primary trunk sewer from the Northeast District is extended into this vicinity. • Maple Hill Estates will connect to the new MCES lift station and eliminate their small wastewater plant in 2018/2019. Southwest District • Loretto will be served by MCES in 2020, therefore future growth in Corcoran will also utilize the Loretto connection (it was previously planned to go through Medina). Chapter 8: Surface Water To protect Corcoran’s numerous wetlands, streams and lakes and comply with legal requirements from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, Metropolitan Council and Minnesota statutes, a Local Water Management plan was prepared for the City of Corcoran. This chapter summarizes the plan. Key changes from the 2030 plan include: • This Comprehensive Plan also includes a “Local Surface Water Management Plan”. This Local Plan reviews the current condition of surface waters, identifies existing or issues related to surface water management, and identifies potential solutions that can be implemented over a 10-year period • New issues brought forth include reviewing the use of chloride-containing salts used for winter deicing, updating buffer requirements, and studying manure management. • A summary of the Local Plan is provided as Chapter 8 in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The complete Local Plan is included as an appendix in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 9: Water Supply With the construction of new developments since the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update, Corcoran has initiated construction of its municipal water system. This chapter provides an overview of the future demand for water supply and how the City plans to provide a sustainable infrastructure system to meet that demand. Key changes from the 2030 plan include: • New maps were created to better show the planned system. • Development in the Northeast District (101 and CR 30) would have a second connection to Maple Grove. February 28, 2019 Chapter 10: Resilience Resiliency is a community’s capacity to respond and thrive under changing conditions while retaining healthy economic, social and environmental systems. This chapter describes how the City can and should prepare to respond to these changes in these systems. Resiliency with regards to the City’s Stormwater management, shoreland and floodplain management, rural character and solar energy access are detailed in Chapter 10. Chapter 11: Implementation This chapter identifies specific strategies and action items that the City will undertake, over the course of several years, to ensure that the programs and policies established in the Plan are reflected in the decisions of the City. The collected implementation statements identified throughout the Plan are consolidated in this chapter for easy future reference. 3. Public Comments: Staff has received comments from two landowners asking the City to consider changes to the draft plan in advance of the Planning Commission public hearing: a. Peter and Jean Dahlheimer have requested that their property at 20702 CR 50 be moved from the fourth to second phase of the sewer staging plan. The sewer staging plan is phased based on how sanitary sewer would be extended. There are a number of properties between this property and property in the second staging area. b. Gary and Phil Schutte requested that their property at 20130 Larkin Road retain the existing Medium Density Residential land use designation rather than the proposed Light Industrial designation proposed by the Council. The Commission considered these changes and recommended no changes to the draft plan for these items. After the public hearing in 2018, staff received an additional comment from landowners Paul and Joan Gibson during the 6-month review period requesting their property remain guided as rural/ag residential. Due to changes requested by the Metropolitan Council, the Gibson’s property and other adjacent properties were moved from the proposed MUSA axpansion area to the future MUSA expansion area and will remain guided as rural/agricultural residential property. 4. Agency Comments The 6-month review of the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan allowed the Metropolitan Council, adjacent communities and other relevant agencies to send written comments on the submitted plan. Based on comments from the Metropolitan Council, the following changes were made to the draft plan: • Maps and tables were updated to provide additional information as requested February 28, 2019 • Timing of the Open Space and Preservation Plat Ordinance amendment was added to the implementation plan • Demographic, economic and housing data were updated to reflect the availability of 2017 data • A figure and text were added to the Parks and Trails chapter referencing the North-South I Regional Trail Search Corridor • A 932-acre area in the southwest corner of the City previously designated as within the MUSA has been modified and is now identified as “Future MUSA Expansion area”. This change is due to an unknown timeline for the MCES system expansion through Maple Plain which is needed to serve this area. • Tables were updated in Chapter 7 to reflect revised MCES forecasts for sewered population/households/employment and unsewered households. • Text was modified to indicate the NE Trunk Sewer connection schedule • Map 7-5 was created using MCES-provided data • Solar calculations were added to accompany the solar resource map Based on comments from the Three Rivers Park District (TRPD), the following changes were made to the draft plan: • A reference to the Diamond Lake Regional Trail was included within the text and as an additional figure in the Parks and Trails chapter. • The Local Surface Water Management Plan was revised to further explain how the city will address discrepancies between its ordinances and the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC). • Several typos were corrected, and small text additions were added based on TRPD comments. • Small text additions were added to include concerns about buffer ordinances and winter chlorides. Other changes since the last Council review, include: • The adjustment of the MUSA line for property (PID 3411923120001) to follow Old Settlers Road rather than the section line. This resulted in a small expansion of the MUSA. • The alignment of Cain Road on the 2040 Transportation Plan was altered after closer review of the potential extension. • The City has acquired the Rockford School property which adds an additional 60 acres to the Corcoran Community Park. This purchase is now reflected in the Parks and Trails chapter. • Wildflower Park has been dedicated as part of the Ravinia development. Construction began in 2018. This has been reflected in the Parks and Trails chapter and on all maps. 5. Action Items: Adopt Resolution 2019-11 authorizing the submittal of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council A 3/5 vote is required to send the plan to the Metropolitan Council. February 28, 2019 Attachments a. Resolution 2019-11 authorizing the submittal of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council b. Proposed Land Use Changes exhibit c. Gibson letter dated October 2, 2018 d. 2040 Comprehensive Plan 51 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek SouthFor kR ushC r eek 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 4/28/2021 1/22/2023 5/26/2020 1/22/2020 1/21/2021 5/26/202010/2020 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 4/22/2020 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN )HHW ± 3DWK / ? ??&RPS3ODQ?)XWXUH/DQG8VHP[G'DWH 7LPH $08VHU 6KX-& Rural/Ag ResidentialExisting ResidentialLow Density Residential Medium Density ResidentialMixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/CommercialCommercialMixed UseBusiness ParkLight IndustrialPublic/Semi-PublicParks/Open SpaceAgricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration)Open WaterMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake CookLake R u sh C r e e k RushCreek S o uth F o rkRushCreek SouthFor kR u shCr eek 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 4/28/2021 1/22/2023 5/26/2020 1/22/2020 7/24/2018 7/24/2018 1/21/2021 5/26/202010/2020 8/9/2018 12/13/22 10/2018 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 4/22/2020 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\2040 Future Land Use.mxdDate: 5/7/2018Time: 2:43:34 PMUser: shujc0243 Rural/Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public Parks/Open Space Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open WaterMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) Draft FINAL DRAFT -- MAY 29, 2018 51 Revised 2040 Land Use Map 1 2 3 4 Draft 2040 Land Use Map 2 3 4 1 Land Use Map Revisions: 1. Future MUSA Expansion Area 2. Line modified to follow property line rather than section line 3. Mixed Residential to Mixed Use 4. Wildflower Park deeded to the City 10/2/18 Dear City Council Members- We moved into our current house in 2010. We chose Corcoran because of the beauty of our property, remote location, Delano school district and a newer home built-in 2001. It was an expensive property and we feel we need to protect our investment. We currently reside at 23875 Chestnut Drive, Corcoran, MN 55357 In the past few months, we became aware that Corcoran has been working on the 2040 plan to move light industrial zoning that would affect our property. We are strongly against this change in zoning and are hoping that the city counsel votes against passing this plan with the existing proposed zoning. We would like the counsel to leave the zoning as residential as it was in the 2030 comprehensive plan. We do not want potential buyers purchasing the farm field to the East of our property with the intention of using it for light industrial purposes. We feel that this would devalue our property and our neighbors’ properties. We also have concern that potential buyers may look at the 2040 plan published on the website and this could impact our value near-term. The proposed zoning change would make sense if these properties were old farm homesteads. But the proposed 2040 zoning covers newer rural residential – two homes built in 2001 and our nearest neighbor in 2016. We have a hard time believing that these highly valued properties and homes would be torn down to make way for industry in 20 years. Can you please let me know if this plan is able to be changed? In summary, we propose the new light industrial zoning expansion be changed back to residential as it was in the 2030 plan for the very southwest corner of Corcoran as shown below. Best regards, Paul and Joan Gibson 2040 Comprehensive Plan 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.ci.corcoran.mn.us FEBRUARY 28, 2019 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City CounCil Mayor ron ThoMas • CounCilor JonaThan BoTTeMa • CounCilor Brian DeJewski • CounCilor Mike keefe • CounCilor alan sChulTz • CounCilor Tonya lafave (forMer) Planning Commissioners CoMMissioner Dean JaCoBs • CoMMissioner MereDiTh wu • CoMMissioner DoroThy Theis • CoMMissioner Jennifer BrewingTon (forMer) Parks and trails Commissioners CoMMissioner ThoMas anDerson • CoMMissioner DeBBie regan • CoMMissioner ChaD roBran • CoMMissioner sharon MeisTer • CoMMissioner JuDiTh sTrehler • CoMMissioner Trish krueger (forMer) City staff CiTy aDMinisTraTor BraD MarTens • PuBliC works DireCTor kevin MaTTson • CiTy Clerk/aDMinisTraTive serviCes CoorDinaTor JessiCa Beise • CoDe CoMPlianCe offiCial Mike PriTCharD • aDMinisTraTive assisTanT MiChelle frieDriCh Consultants wenCk assoCiaTes, inC. kenT Torve • susan nelson • JorDan shuCk • eD Terhaar •MaTT Bowers landform kenDra linDahl • Danyelle PierqueT • kevin shay • kaThleen haMMer • eMily oThsus • JP Mansolf Thank you To The many residenTs of CorCoran who shared Their ideas and visions for The fuTure CiTy of CorCoran! PiCTure/image CrediTs -- Pexels.Com • Brad marTens • JessiCa Beise • miChelle friedriCh • mike PriTChard 4 ChaPter 5: Parks and trailsFigures continued 5-12 Regional Bicycle TRanspoRTaTion neTwoRk 76 5-13 Regional TRail seaRch aRea 76 5-14 DiamonD lake RT map 76 5-15 counTy Bikeway sysTem 76 5-16 concepTual Regional TRail sysTem 76tables 5-1 pRojecTeD acRes of paRk lanD 75 5-2 ciTy anD counTy TRail sysTem 75 Maps 5-1 paRks anD TRails plan 79 ChaPter 6: t ransPortation 81goals and policies 83 suppoRT anD RaTionale 83 2018 existingtransportation systeM 83 highways anD sTReeTs 83 access managemenT guiDelines 85 TRaffic Volumes 86transportation issues 87 highway 55 coRRiDoR 87 counTy RoaD 10 anD counTy RoaD 50 RealignmenT 87 noRThwesT hennepin counTy TRanspoRTaTion impRoVemenTs 87 counTy RoaD 30 87 inTeRchange aT i-94/BRockTon lane 87 RiVeR cRossings 87 transit systeM 88 fReighT 88 aViaTion faciliTies 88 Bicycling anD walking 882040 Future transportation systeM 88 highways anD sTReeTs 88 RoaDway capaciTy analysis 89 Figures 6-1 exisTing RoaDway juRisTicTion 84 6-2 exisTing RoaDway funcTional classificaTion 84tables 6-1 foRecasT By populaTion, householD anD 86 employmenT 6-2 leVel of seRVice DescRipTion 86 6-3 geneRalizeD planning aVeRage Daily 86 TRaffice Volume ThResholD 6-4 2040 planning los 89 6-5 numBeR of lanes 89 6-6 hennepin counTy -- Base 2040 RoaDway 89 neTwoRk impRoVemenTs 6-7 hennepin counTy -- opTional 2030 RoaDway 89 neTwoRk imRRoVemenTsMaps 6-1 exisTing RoaDway juRisDicTion 91 6-2 exisTing RoaDway funcTional 93 classificaTion 6-3 TRaffic analysis zones 95 6-4 exisTing annual aVeRage Daily TRaffic 97 Volumes (aaDT) 6-5 TRanspoRTaTion issue aReas 99 6-6 2040 aVeRage Daily TRaffic Volumes (aaDT)101 6-7 2040 RoaDway funcTional classificaTion 103 ChaPter 1: introdu Ction and Community 7BaCkground Metropolitan planning act 9 2030 plan 9 2040 Vision stateMent 9 regional setting 9coMMunity background 10deMographics and Forecasts 10natural characteristics 11 exisTing naTuRal ResouRces 11 waTeR ResouRces 12 naTuRal ResouRces pRoTecTion 13Figures 1-1 populaTion anD housing 10 1-2 populaTion By age anD genDeR 11 1-3 householD Type 11 1-4 aVeRage householD size 11 1-5 populaTion anD householD foRecasTs 11Maps 1-1 Regional seTTing 15 1-2 meT council communiTy DesignaTion 17 1-3 exisTing lanD use 19 1-4 puBlic/semi puBlic faciliTies 21 1-5 sTReeT suRface map 23 1-6 school DisTRicT BounDaRies 25 1-7 naTuRal ResouRce inVenToRy aReas 27 1-8 hyDRologic soil gRoup 29 1-9 waTeR ResouRces 31 1-10 fema flooDplains 33 1-11 weTlanD locaTions anD classificaTions 35 1-12 ecologically significanT aReas 37 1-13 BuffeR pRoTecTeD waTeRs 39 ChaPter 2: land use 41 goals and policies 43 2040 land use and growth ManageMent 44 RelaTionship To meTRopoliTan council ThRiVe msp 2040 plan 44 foRecasTs 44 lanD use caTegoRies 45 sTaging 47 gRowTh managemenT 47 protecting special resources 48 hisToRic pReseRVaTion 48 aggRegaTe ResouRces 48Figures 2-1 Town cenTeR plan 46 tables 2-1 2040 lanD use acReage TaBle 44 2-2 2040 musa DensiTy 45 2-3 ResiDenTial uniTs anD DensiTy By sTaging 45 2-4 meTRopoliTan coucnil DensiTy calcuaTion 45 2-5 lanD use DesignaTions 45 Maps 2-1 2040 fuTuRe lanD use 51 2-2 2040 sTaging plan 53 ChaPter 3: housing 55 goals and policies 57 housing assessMent 57 housholD foRecasTs 57 housing DeVelopmenT TRenDs 57 housing pRices anD RenTs 58 ChaPter 3: housing Continuedhousing needs 59 affoRDaBle housing 59 life-cycle housing 60 senioR housing 60 Figures 3-1 populaTion anD householD gRowTh 57 3-2 coRcoRan’s housing sTock 58 3-3 BuilDing peRmiTs 58 3-4 age of housing sTock 58 3-5 meDian housing Value 58 3-6 coRcoRan housing Value 59 3-7 meDian gRoss RenT 59 3-8 peRcenT of householD cosT BuRDen 60 3-9 owneR occupieD housing By esTimaTeD maRkeT Value 60tables 3-1 populaTion anD householD gRoTh 57 3-2 coRcoRan’s housing sTock 58 3-3 meDian housing Value 58 3-4 exisTing uniTs affoRDaBle By housholD income 59 3-5 affoRDaBle housing neeD allocaTion 59 ChaPter 4: eConomiC ComPetitiveness 63 goals and policies 65econoMic assessMent 65econoMic deVelopMent opportunities 66Figures 4-1 numBeR of joBs locaTeD in coRcoRan 65 4-2 employmenT By inDusTRy 65 4-3 foRecasTeD employmenT in coRcoRan 65 4-4 aVeRage annual wages 66 4-5 coRcoRan meDian householD income 66tables 4-1 coRcoRan Top Ten woRkplaces foR 66 ResiDenTs in 2015 ChaPter 5: Parks and trails 69application 71 goals and policies 71 areas outside the 2040 Metropolitan urban serVice area (Musa) 72 guiDelines 72 park classiFications 72 neighBoRhooD paRk 73 communiTy paRk 73 local lineaR paRks, TRails, coRRiDoRs anD paRkways 73 exisTing ciTy paRks 73 pRiVaTe paRk 74parks and trails locations 74Future parks 74 DemogRaphics/communiTy gRowTh 74 local TRenDs 74 fuTuRe pRojecTions By Type 75 Future trails 77Figures 5-1 2040 musa insiDe BounDaRies 71 5-2 2040 musa ouTsiDe BounDaRies 72 5-3 coRcoRan communiTy paRk 73 5-4 coRcoRan ciTy hall anD memoRial paRk 73 5-5 RaVinia paRk 74 5-6 coRcoRan communiTy aThleTic complex 74 5-7 coRcoRan lion’s paRk 74 5-8 ThRu 5-11 fuTuRe TRail examples 75 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ChaPter 7: WasteWater 105 goals and polices 107 Metropolitan council interceptor connections 107 Forecasts 108 trunk sanitary sewer systeM design 108 lanD use 108 esTimaTeD aVeRage wasTewaTeR flow 108 Design flows 109 TRunk saniTaRy seweR sysTem sizing 109 inFiltration and inFlow (i/i) 109 indiVidual sewage treatMent systeMs (ists) 110 intercoMMunity Flow connections 110 centralized wastewater treatMent systeMs 110 Figures 7-1 peak flow facToRs 109 tables 7-1 ciTy-wiDe populaTion, householD anD 108 employmenT foRecasTs 7-2 seweReD populaTion, householD, anD 108 employmenT foRecasTs 7-3 aVeRage wasTewaTeR flow pRojecTions 108 7-4 aVeRage wasTewaTeR flow pRojecTions 108 By mDs connecTion 7-5 sysTem Design wasTewaTeR uniT flow RaTes 109 7-6 infilTRaTion anD inflow goal 110 Maps 7-1 exisTing saniTaRy seweR sysTem 113 7-2 pRoposeD TRunk saniTaRy seweR sysTem 115 noRTheasT DisTRicT 7-3 pRoposeD TRunk saniTaRy seweR sysTem 117 souTheasT DisTRicT 7-4 pRoposeD TRunk saniTaRy seweR sysTem 119 souThwesT DisTRicT 7-5 exisTing unseweReD aReas 121 ChaPter 8: s urfaCe Water 123 goals and polices 125 current conditions 126 probleMs and solutions 126 Figures 8-1 elm cReek waTeRsheD BounDaRies 126 Maps 8-1 waTeRsheD managemenT oRgnaizaTions an 127 DRainage paTTeRns ChaPter 9: Water s uPPly 129 policies and goals 131 water supply systeM 131 waTeR DemanDs 131 concepTual fuTuRe waTeR supply sysTem 132 resource sustainability 132 naTuRal ResouRce impacTs 132 susTainaBiliTy 132 souRce waTeR pRoTecTion plan 133 water conserVation plan 133 tables 9-1 coRcoRan populaTion anD waTeR 131 DemanD pRojecTions By yeaR 9-2 coRcoRan populaTion anD waTeR 132 DemanD pRojecTions By aRea Maps 9-1 exisTing waTeR sysTem 135 9-2 TRunk waTeR sysTem 137 ChaPter 10: resilienCe 139 goals and policies 141 storMwater 141 shoreland and Floodplain ManageMent 141 rural resiliency 142 agRiculTuRal pReseRVes 142 solar access protection 142tables 10-1 gRoss anD RoofTop solaR ResouRce calculaTions 142Maps 10-1 solaR insolaTion 143 ChaPter 11: imPlementation 145 tables 11-1 land use 147 11-2 housing 147 11-3 econoMic coMpetitiVeness 147 11-4 parks and trails 148 11-5 transportation 148 11-6 wastewater 148 11-7 surFace water 148 11-8 water supply 149 11-9 resilience 149 aPPendiCes 151 appendix a ultiMate wastewater systeM design 153 appendix b local surFace water ManageMent plan 163 appendix c local water supply plan 245 appendix d capital iMproVeMent plan 281 appendix e adopted zoning Map 287 6 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY BACKGROUND MeTroPoliTan Planning aCT 9 2030 Plan 9 2040 vision sTaTeMenT 9 regional seTTing 9 CoMMuniTy BaCkgrounD 10 DeMograPhiCs anD foreCasTs 10 foreCasTs 11 naTural CharaCTerisTiCs 11 exisTing naTural resourCes 11 waTer resourCes 12 naTural resourCes ProTeCTion 13 figures 1-1 PoPulaTion anD housing 10 1-2 PoPulaTion By age anD genDer 11 1-3 householD TyPe 11 1-4 average householD size 11 1-5 PoPulaTion anD householD foreCasTs 11 MaPs 1-1 regional seTTing 15 1-2 MeT CounCil CoMMuniTy DesignaTion 17 1-3 exisTing lanD use 19 1-4 PuBliC faCiliTies 21 1-5 sTreeT surfaCe MaP 23 1-6 sChool DisTriCT BounDaries 25 1-7 naTural resourCe invenTory areas 27 1-8 soils anD ToPograPhy 29 1-9 waTer resourCes 30 1-10 feMa flooDPlains 33 1-11 weTlanD loCaTions anD ClassifiCaTions 35 1-12 eCologiCally signifiCanT areas 37 1-13 Buffer ProTeCTeD waTers 39 8 9 INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY BACKGROUND The visions of 2040 Corcoran will be achieved through the community’s adherence to the following guiding principles: 1. Protection of the natural resources, open space, and rural character that define Corcoran’s quality of life. 2. Creation of opportunities for a thriving Town Center with a range of retail, office, residential, and gathering spaces. 3. Creation of opportunities for expanded employment and tax bases combining commercial, industrial, and business park land uses. 4. Expansion of residential options to achieve life-cycle housing. 5. Support of rural residential development in non-urbanized Corcoran in a manner that preserves efficient, future urbanization and protects natural resources while allowing current economic benefit to landowners. regional setting Corcoran is located on the northwestern edge of Hennepin County, and is located 20 miles from downtown Minneapolis. Corcoran has remained generally rural and comprises just under 36 square miles of land. The vast majority of the city is located in the Rush Creek and Elm Creek Watershed systems, with a small area in southwest Corcoran draining into the Pioneer/ Sarah Creek watershed, and then emptying into the Crow River. Communities bordering Corcoran include the cities of Maple Grove, Medina, Greenfield, Hanover, and Rogers. Map1-1: Regional Setting (See page 15 for large size map.) Afton Andover Anoka Apple Valley ArdenHills Baytown Belle Plaine Benton Bethel Blaine Blakely Bloomington BrooklynCenter Brooklyn Park Burnsville Camden Carver Castle RockCedar Lake CentervilleChamplin Chanhassen Chaska CirclePines Coates Cologne ColumbiaHeights Columbus Coon Rapids Corcoran Cottage Grove Credit River Crystal Dahlgren Dayton Deephaven Dellwood Denmark Douglas Eagan East Bethel Eden Prairie Edina Elko NewMarket Empire Eureka Excelsior FalconHeights Farmington Forest Lake FortSnelling Fridley GemLake Golden Valley Grant Greenfield Greenvale Greenwood GreyCloudIsland Ham Lake Hamburg Hampton Hancock Hastings Helena Hilltop Hollywood Hopkins Hugo Independence InverGroveHeights Jackson Jordan Lake Elmo Lake SaintCroix Beach LakelandShores Laketown Lakeville Landfall Lauderdale Lexington Lilydale Lino Lakes Linwood LittleCanada Long Lake Loretto Louisville Mahtomedi Maple Grove Maple Plain Maplewood Marineon SaintCroix Marshan May Mayer MedicineLake Medina Mendota MendotaHeights Miesville Minneapolis MinnetonkaMinnetonkaBeach Minnetrista Mound MoundsView NewBrighton NewGermany New Hope New Market New Prague New Trier Newport Nininger North Oaks NorthSaintPaul Northfield NorwoodYoungAmerica Nowthen Oak Grove Oak ParkHeights OakdaleOrono Osseo Pine Springs Plymouth Prior Lake Ramsey Randolph Ravenna Richfield Robbinsdale Rogers Rosemount RosevilleSaintAnthony SaintBonifacius Saint Francis SaintLawrence SaintLouisPark Saint Paul SaintPaulPark San Francisco Sand Creek Savage Scandia Sciota Shakopee Shoreview Shorewood SouthSaintPaul Spring Lake SpringLakePark Stillwater SunfishLake TonkaBay VadnaisHeights Vermillion Victoria Waconia Waterford Watertown Wayzata West Lakeland WestSaintPaul White Bear WhiteBearLake Willernie Woodbury Young America AnokaCounty Washington County Hennepin County Ramsey County CarverCounty DakotaCounty ScottCounty §¨¦394 §¨¦494 §¨¦694 §¨¦94 §¨¦35 §¨¦694 §¨¦35E §¨¦394W §¨¦35W §¨¦35 §¨¦35W §¨¦94 §¨¦694 §¨¦35E Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 10 0 105 Miles ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Regional Setting.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 8:53:48 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryCounty BoundariesMinor Civil DivisionsInterstate Map 1-1Regional Setting The Metropolitan Council has classified eastern and southern portions of Corcoran as “Emerging Suburban Edge.” These are communities on the edge of the metropolitan area where substantial new growth has or is expected to occur. The western half of Corcoran is classified by the Metropolitan Council as a “Diversified Rural” area. Diversified Rural communities are defined by the Metropolitan Council as the sparsely developed parts of the region that host the widest variety of farm and non- farm uses. Uses include a mix of limited large-lot residential and clustered housing, agriculture, and facilities and services requiring a rural location. Limited growth is forecasted for these areas, and they are not currently planned for urban development. The Metropolitan Council has adopted a Flexible Development Ordinance for Diversified Rural communities to ensure that development patterns are efficient and cost-effective while also providing opportunities for landowners. Emerging Suburban Edge communities include cities, townships and portions of both that are in the early stages of transitioning into urbanized levels of development. Emerging Suburban Edge communities are expected to plan for forecasted population and household growth at average densities of at least 3-5 units per acre for new development and redevelopment. There are 9,075 acres in the 2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). This designation allows development of land to occur at urban densities with urban infrastructure of City water, stormwater, and sewer facilities. Diversified Rural communities are home to a variety of farm and nonfarm land uses including very large-lot residential, clustered housing, hobby farms and agricultural uses. Diversified Rural communities are expected to plan for growth not to exceed forecasts and in patterns that do not exceed 4 units per 40 acres, except when as part of open space preservation plan that is consistent with the flexible residential development guidelines outlined in Metropolitan Council policy. In addition, Diversified Rural communities are expected to manage land uses to prevent the premature demand for extension of urban services, and so that existing service levels will meet service needs. Map1-2: Community Designations (See page 17 for large size map.) metroPolitan Planning aCt The Metropolitan Planning Act requires every City in the 7-county metropolitan area to create a 20-year comprehensive plan and update the plan every 10 years. The Metropolitan Council reviews every City’s comprehensive plan to ensure the plan is compatible with regional system plans for sewer, transportation, parks and open space. The City of Corcoran has prepared an updated comprehensive plan that achieves the community’s own vision and goals for the future, while meeting the Metropolitan Council’s regional planning requirements. 2030 Plan The City’s 4th comprehensive plan, the 2030 Plan, was approved in March 2010. The 2030 Plan identified Corcoran as a growing community with a walkable downtown, along with commercial and industrial businesses, housing variety, and natural resources. The 2030 Plan continued to emphasize the importance of Corcoran’s abundance of natural resources and open spaces. 2040 vision statement Corcoran’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the 2040 Plan, represents a community-generated update to the 2030 Plan. The update process involved Corcoran residents, the City Council, Planning Commission, and Parks and Trails Commission. The update process included 10 City Council work sessions focused on the Comprehensive Plan components and discussion at multiple City Council meetings. Two community-wide surveys and 3 community engagement sessions were held to identify a vision for Corcoran in the year 2040. This vision is supported by and will be achieved through a series of principles, goals, and policies related to land use and development. The City of Corcoran in 2040 will be a vibrant community, defined by its dynamic Town Center, strong base of commercial and industrial businesses, variety of housing options, and high-value natural resources. The mixed-use Town Center, planned to be northeast of the junction of County Road 116 and County Road 10, will provide the community with a public gathering space as well as retail and job opportunities for residents. Corcoran’s 2040 commercial, industrial, and business park developments will provide both local employment and a stronger, more diverse tax base. Broader housing options in 2040 will ensure a place in our community for first-time homebuyers, growing families, and seniors. Corcoran is defined by its abundance of high-quality natural resources and open spaces along with its rural environment. These resources and rural character are intrinsic to our quality of life and has been of long-standing appeal for existing and new residents of the community. One of the two community surveys that were conducted as part of the 2040 Comp Plan update process was dedicated to answering the question “what is rural character?” Although the term rural character can mean different things to different people, key themes were clear. The survey showed that the community of Corcoran found importance in: open and green space, active farming and agriculture, large lots and low density, natural areas and wildlife, and amenities not found in more urban locations such as trails for hiking, horseback riding, and snowmobiling. The 2040 Plan will enable the residents of 2040 Corcoran to continue to share in this defining experience. Afton Andover Anoka Apple Valley ArdenHills Baytown Belle Plaine Benton Bethel Blaine Blakely Bloomington BrooklynCenter Brooklyn Park Burnsville Camden Carver Castle RockCedar Lake CentervilleChamplin Chanhassen Chaska CirclePines Coates Cologne ColumbiaHeights Columbus Coon Rapids Corcoran Cottage Grove Credit River Crystal Dahlgren Dayton Deephaven Dellwood Denmark Douglas Eagan East Bethel Eden Prairie Edina Elko NewMarket Empire Eureka Excelsior FalconHeights Farmington Forest Lake FortSnelling Fridley GemLake Golden Valley Grant Greenfield Greenvale Greenwood GreyCloudIsland Ham Lake Hamburg Hampton Hancock Hastings Helena Hilltop Hollywood Hopkins Hugo Independence InverGroveHeights Jackson Jordan Lake Elmo Lake SaintCroix Beach LakelandShores Laketown Lakeville Landfall Lauderdale Lexington Lilydale Lino Lakes Linwood LittleCanada Long Lake Loretto Louisville Mahtomedi Maple Grove Maple Plain Maplewood Marineon SaintCroix Marshan May Mayer MedicineLake Medina Mendota MendotaHeights Miesville Minneapolis MinnetonkaMinnetonkaBeach Minnetrista Mound MoundsView NewBrighton NewGermany New Hope New Market New Prague New Trier Newport Nininger North Oaks NorthSaintPaul Northfield NorwoodYoungAmerica Nowthen Oak Grove Oak ParkHeights OakdaleOrono Osseo Pine Springs Plymouth Prior Lake Ramsey Randolph Ravenna Richfield Robbinsdale Rogers Rosemount RosevilleSaintAnthony SaintBonifacius Saint Francis SaintLawrence SaintLouisPark Saint Paul SaintPaulPark San Francisco Sand Creek Savage Scandia Sciota Shakopee Shoreview Shorewood SouthSaintPaul Spring Lake SpringLakePark Stillwater SunfishLake TonkaBay VadnaisHeights Vermillion Victoria Waconia Waterford Watertown Wayzata West Lakeland WestSaintPaul White Bear WhiteBearLake Willernie Woodbury Young America AnokaCounty Washington CountyHennepin County Ramsey County CarverCounty DakotaCounty ScottCounty 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 10 0 105 Miles ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Community Designations.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 8:54:25 AMUser: ShuJC0243 AgriculturalRural ResidentialDiversified RuralRural CenterEmerging Suburban EdgeSuburban EdgeSuburbanUrbanUrban CenterMunicipal BoundaryCounty BoundariesMinor Civil Divisions Map 1-2Community Designations Source:Thrive MSP 2040 Community Designation (Metropolitan Council) 10 Map1-3: Existing Land Use (See page 19 for large size map.) Community BaCkground Agriculture remains a significant and valued part of the community. Open space and other high-quality natural resource areas are abundant, and these amenities are highly valued by residents. A remarkable 21 percent of the City’s total land area consists of wetlands (National Wetland Inventory Areas), lakes, and open water, as well as 52 miles of streams. There are also mutliple areas of potential and possible wetlands throughout the City. The City’s 2020 and 2030 Plan included a Natural Resource Inventory (NRI) that identified all of the significant natural resource areas in the community. The NRI also provided recommendations and priorities for the preservation and enhancement of the natural systems. The Natural Resources Chapter of the 2030 Plan incorporated many of the NRI findings and recommendations. Large lot, rural residential single-family homes are the predominant form of housing in Corcoran. A smaller number of suburban-sized lots are located near the Town Ceneter and in other select areas. A manufactured home park is located in southeast Corcoran. Residents in Corcoran have identified the need for life-cycle housing in the community, in particular to address the lack of housing opportunities for first-time home buyers and downsizing seniors. Commercial and industrial development in the City is limited, primarily due to the lack of municipal water and sewer services and the absence of major transport corridors. The City supports continuation and expansion of commercial and industrial enterprises in the area at County Road 116 and County Road 10. There is a rural service/commercial area located in northwest Corcoran at the intersection of County Roads 10 and 19. Commercial and industrial activities also occur in southwestern Corcoran, at the intersection of Highway 55 and County Road 19. Corcoran has 2 main City facilities. This includes City Hall, which is shared by Administration and the Police Department and is located on County Road 116.The City also has a Public Works facility located on County Road 19 as well as a small auxiliary public work building located on Cain Road (Old Public Works). Corcoran has a community park, a neighborhood park and a memorial garden park. The City is home to 3 golf courses and Corcoran Lion’s Park, which hosts a multitude of events, including Hamel Rodeo, Corcoran Country Days, tractor pulls, etc. The North Hennepin Pioneer Society owns and maintains a historic single-room school on County Road 10.There are multiple churches and cemeteries in the City. These facility locations a can be viewed on Map 1-4. The City is comprised of a network of different roadways, including State Highway, County Roads, and City Streets. Corcoran is unique in that the City’s local streets are comprised of a nearly equal amount of pavement and gravel. Map 1-5 shows approximately 36 miles of paved roads and 34 miles of gravel roads. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Coun ty R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blu e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake î î î s s [j [j ñ ñ ï ï î î s ñ ï å R u sh Cr e e k RushCreek SouthFork Rush C r e e k South Fork Rush Creek RushCreek City Hall Old PublicWorks Public Works BurschvilleSchool House 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Public Facilities Map.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 2:53:34 PMUser: ShuJC0243 ñ Government Building [j Public Park s Golf Course î Church ï Cemetery å School HouseMunicipal BoundaryStreamsTrailheadParcel BoundariesPublic/Semi-PublicParks/Open Space/Golf Course Lake/Open Water Map 1-4Public/Semi Public Facilities Map Map 1-4: Public Facilities (See page 21 for large size map.) Map 1-5: Street Surface Type (See page 23 for large size map.) Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pion e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Cou nty Roa d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blu e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C re e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek SouthForkRushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Street Surface Type.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 11:54:17 AMUser: ShuJC0243 MNDOT Paved (0.2 mi.)County Paved (37.5 mi.)Local Street Paved (36.0 mi)Local Street Gravel (33.9 mi.)Municipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-5Street Surface Type Corcoran is divided between 5 different school districts: Buffalo-Hanover- Montrose Schools (ISD 877), Delano Public Schools (ISD 879), Osseo Area Schools (ISD279), Rockford Area Schools (ISD 883), and Wayzata Public Schools (ISD 284). There are no public schools located in Corcoran. One private school, St. John’s Lutheran Church, offers pre-kindergarten through 8th grade education. Map 1-6: School District Boundaries (See page 25 for large size map.) demograPhiCs and foreCasts The City’s population was estimated at 5,592 in 2017. Figure 1-1 provides historical population trends, demonstrating a significant period of growth during the 1970s, when many of the City’s “large lot” neighborhoods were developed. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Coun t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake ISD#279 Osseo ISD#284 Wayzata ISD#877 Buffalo-Hanover-Montrose ISD#879 Delano ISD#883 Rockford R u s h Cr e e k RushCreek South F o r k RushCreek Sout h Fork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\School District Boundaries.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 2:53:43 PMUser: ShuJC0243 Buffalo-Hanover-MontroseDelanoOsseoRockfordWayzataMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-6School District Boundaries Source:School District Boundaries (Minnesota Department of Education) Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co un t y R oa d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek SouthForkRushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing Land Use.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 9:15:38 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Farmstead Single Family Detached Manufactured Housing Park Single Family Attached Retail and Other Commercial Mixed Use Residential Industrial and Utility Institutional Park, Recreational or Preserve Golf Course Major Highway Agricultural Undeveloped WaterMunicipal BoundaryStreams Map 1-3Metropolitan Council Existing Land Use Source:Metropolitan Council Existing Landuse (Metropolitan Council, 2016)Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) 11 The City’s 2017 population is broken down by age and gender in Figure 1-2: Population by Age. According to the American Community Survey, the City’s 2017 median age was 43.3 years, which was higher than the median age of 36.3 years in Hennepin County. Approximately 24 percent of Corcoran’s population was under the age of 18 in 2017, while 11.7 percent (up from 7.7 percent in 2010) of the population was over age 65. Like many cities in the U.S., the City’s median age is expected to increase as the “baby boom” generation enters retirement. Over 52 percent of households are families without children with the average household size of 2.86. See Figure 1-3: Household Type in Corcoran; Figure 1-4 Average Household Size in Corcoran. natural CharaCteristiCs Corcoran’s abundant, high-quality natural resources and open spaces are the predominant elements of the rural character that define the City. The City’s open spaces consist primarily of farmed areas under active cultivation. Significantly, 47 percent of the City’s land area consists of relatively undisturbed natural resource communities, including upland areas of savanna/pasture, maple/basswood woodlands, and oak forests, as well as wetlands, open water, and streams. Balancing preservation of these features with future growth is a cornerstone of the 2040 Plan. One of the goals of this Plan is to preserve the highest quality natural resources, as identified by the Natural Resource Inventory. The goal places priority on the natural resources patterns in the community in directing future development. The land use plan for the City is shaped by the existing environment. Sensitive natural areas create boundaries for development planning, affect the location of new services, and provide buffers between land uses. Existing natural rEsourcEs The areas of Corcoran that are not farmed or have not been developed for residential, public, or commercial uses can be divided into 2 broad categories – Natural Areas and Semi-Natural Areas. The Natural Areas are defined by the existence of native plant communities and the Semi-Natural Areas are defined by areas where original vegetation has largely been replaced by non- native plant species. natural areas At the time of European settlement, northwestern Hennepin County was comprised primarily of maple-basswood forest and mesic oak forest (referred to as Big Woods), with inclusions of wet prairie, marshes, and lakes. Examples of this historic vegetation remain in locations scattered throughout the City, as identified on Map 1-7: Natural Resource Inventory. Some of the best examples of Big Woods remnants are found along both the north and south Rush Creek corridors. Other fragmented native forest remnants can be found in the west central portion of the City. Map1-7: Natural Resource Inventory Areas (See page 27 for large size map.) Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Count y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C re e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek SouthForkRushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Natural Resource Inventory Areas.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 1:10:39 PMUser: ShuJC0243 ^_Natural Community !(Rare Species OccurenceHigh Quality Natural Community Natural Plant Communities WetlandsWet PrairieEmergentShrubFloodplain ForestOpen WaterFlood Plain (Reed Canary Dominant) UplandsSavanna/PastureMaple/BasswoodOak ForestDisturbed WoodlandOld FieldMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-7Natural Resource Inventory Areas Note: Due to limitations of map scale, distribution and proportion of NaturalCommunity types within each colored area are approximate.Source:Natural Plant Communities, Rare Species Occurence (Natural Resource Inventory andManagement Plan, Nov. 2001, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates) Forecasts As part of the planning process, the City and the Metropolitan Council have agreed on household, population, and employment forecasts for the City. These forecasts underlie substantially all of the 2040 Plan elements. These forecasts are presented in Figure 1-5: Population and Household Forecasts. The City’s future land use and infrastructure plans were developed to accommodate the 2040 forecasts. This ensures the City has guided enough land and has adequate infrastructure in place to accommodate projected growth. natural resourCe areas -- 47 PerCent 19% Wetlands 2% Open Water 26% Upland Areas Savanna/Pasture, Maple/Basswood woodlands, and Oak Forests 12 High-quality wetland areas occur within and adjacent to the Rush Creek corridors and Jubert Lake. The Minnesota County Biological Survey identifies 2 wetland areas to be of state-wide interest. One is a moderate quality wet meadow community in the southwest part of the City (Sections 34 and 35). While the diversity of the wet meadow has been reduced by ditching, the size of the complex and connections to other large wetlands contribute to its ranking. The second is a moderate quality tamarack swamp in the south- central part of the City (Section 33), that is part of a larger upland-wetland complex and includes Morin Lake. Corcoran is within the southwestern range of the tamarack swamp plant community, making this wetland area rare and unique within the City. semi-natural areas Semi-natural areas are areas of land not subject to active use and that are dominated by vegetation not originally found in those locations. Examples include fallow pasture or crop land that has been retired (old field), degraded wetlands dominated by reed canary grass or other invasive species, and secondary growth or disturbed woodlands, typically dominated by box elder, green ash, and basswood. These areas still offer significant benefits for wildlife and water quality protection. These areas often form important buffers around and connections between higher quality Natural Areas. These Semi- Natural Areas form much of the open space and undeveloped lands within the City. Sites with proximity to high-quality natural resource areas or that tend to assist in the formation of connected natural resource corridors should be considered high priority for restoration. soils The soils of northwestern Hennepin County are predominantly loams, which historically supported mixed hardwood forests, wet prairie, and savanna. These soils are also well-suited for agricultural crops such as corn, soybeans, hays, and pasture lands. Non-draining depressions occur frequently in this portion of northwestern Hennepin County and tend to support hydrophilic vegetation (i.e., wetland plants such as sedges, grasses, rushes, and wetland herbs) and organic soil accumulation. Map 1-8: Hydrologic Soil (See page 29 for large size map.) WatEr rEsourcEs Water resources define and affect every aspect of the community’s use and enjoyment of the Corcoran natural environment. Surface waters, both protected and non-protected, wetlands, and groundwater all dictate how the community lives, works, and plays. Water is a resource of common interest and importance throughout the community. surfaCe Water The City has a number of surface water resources, including the North Fork of Rush Creek in northwestern Corcoran and Rush Creek in the central and eastern portion of the City. There are also numerous tributary watercourses and ditches, wetlands, and several small named lakes. A portion of the surface water resources are defined as “protected waters.” Protected waters include lakes, rivers, wetlands or other bodies of water meeting standards set by State law. These sites provide public value for recreation, water quality, water supply, wildlife habitat, or are publicly owned. The Minnesota DNR has regulatory authority over protected waters, including issuance and enforcement of permits controlling activities that impact these areas. Map 1-9: Water Resource (See page 31 for large size map.) The City also has significant areas of FEMA Floodway and Floodplain. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co un t y Ro a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blu e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C re e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek South Fork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\FEMA Floodplains.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 3:12:29 PMUser: ShuJC0243 100 Year Floodplain500 Year FloodplainMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-10FEMA Floodplains Source:FEMA Floodplains (FEMA/Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) Map 1-10: FEMA Floodplains (See page 33 for large size map.) groundWater Groundwater wells located in portions of northern and southwestern Corcoran collect water from the Prairie du Chien-Jordan Aquifer. The remaining wells in the City draw water from the Franconia-Ironton-Galesville Aquifer. Hennepin County leads efforts to protect this groundwater supply. The County monitors groundwater elevations and maintains an inventory of contamination sites. Wetlands Wetlands are common throughout Corcoran, covering approximately 19 percent of the City’s land area. An even greater percentage of land is unbuildable due to its proximity to these wetlands. Corcoran’s Wetlands provide a number of valuable services to the community, including natural flood control, cleaning flowing water, recharging groundwater, and creating valuable habitat for wildlife. Wetlands are an aesthetic amenity in many developments and can provide visual and spatial buffers between homes. Nearly all of Corcoran’s wetlands are protected by Minnesota’s Wetland Conservation Act and certain waterways are also affected by Federal regulations. Appropriate permits are required prior to any activities that fill, drain, or otherwise impact regulated wetlands. Map 1-11: Wetlands (See page 35 for large size map.) Several resources exist to assist in identifying wetlands. The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) is a national assessment of wetland resources, conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, between 1988 and 1992 within the State of Minnesota. The NWI is useful in giving an estimate of the extent (i.e. approximate geographic location) and type (i.e. system, hydrologic regime and predominant vegetation types) of wetlands within the City. The NWI survey was based strictly on aerial photography reconnaissance and interpretation and may be less accurate than some of the other sources. The City’s Natural Resource Inventory was completed in 2001 with inventories of both upland and wetland communities. Most areas were field- checked and mapped using current aerial photographs. Prior to that, the Hennepin Conservation District (HCD) completed a remote assessment of wetland and potential wetland areas within Hennepin County based on a review of then-current aerial photographs, topography, and hydric soils information. This survey includes potential wetland areas not included in the NWI (altered or restorable) and omits wetlands that have been filled since the completion of the NWI. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl County R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek SouthForkRushCreek 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Soils and Topography.mxdDate: 1/7/2019 Time: 1:27:47 PM User: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryStreamsParcel BoundariesA (Soils having a high infiltration rate)B (Moderate infiltration rate)C (Low infiltration rate)D (Very low infiltration rate)A/DB/DC/DIf a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologicgroup (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letteris for drained areas and the second isfor undrained areas.Lake/Open Water 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLANMap 1-8Hydrologic Soil Group Source:SSURGO Soils Database (Natural Resources Conservation Service) Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co unty R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blu e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake Unna m e d S t r e a m U n n a m e d C r e e k U nnam ed Creek R u s h Creek,SouthFork SarahCre e k RushCreek RushCreek Unnam e dCre e k U nn amed Creek Unn a m e d Creek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Water Resources.mxdDate: 1/7/2019 Time: 3:11:18 PM User: ShuJC0243 Public Water WatercoursePublic Ditch/Altered Natural WatercoursePublic Waters BasinsNatural Environment DNRShoreland ClassificationMunicipal BoundaryParcel Boundaries Map 1-9Water Resources Source:Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)Revised National Wetland Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co un t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C re e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek South Fork RushCreek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Wetland Locations and Classifications.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 3:19:04 PMUser: ShuJC0243 1 - Seasonally Flooded Basin or Flat2 - Wet Meadow3 - Shallow Marsh4 - Deep Marsh5 - Shallow Open Water6 - Shrub Swamp7 - Wooded Swamp8 - BogsMunicipal BoundaryStreamsParcel BoundariesLake/Open Water Map 1-11Wetland Locations and Classifications Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (Minnesota Departmentof Natural Resources 2009-2014) 13 The 2008 Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) Mapping and Natural Resource Inventory included a field check and identified both upland and wetland communities of ecological significance. Map 1-12: Ecologically Significant Natural Areas (See page 37 for large size map.) natural rEsourcEs ProtEction A variety of tools and strategies are available to the City to manage and protect its natural resources as identified in Chapters 5 and eleven. Map 1-13: Buffer Protection Areas (See page 39 for large size map.) Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Coun t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake Rush CreekHENN_28679 HENN_12792 Rush Creek,South ForkHENN_28672 HENN_26 HENN_11 HENN_12794 HENN_12 HENN_16HENN_14 HENN_18 HENN_13 HENN_17 HENN_29 HENN_28 Rush CreekHENN_9224 Unnamed CreekHENN_9250 HENN_9 Rush Creek,South ForkHENN_9249 HENN_24 HENN_8 HENN_25 Rush CreekHENN_9225 HENN_27 Unnamed CreekHENN_9251 Rush Creek,South ForkHENN_9249 Unnamed CreekHENN_9228 Rush CreekHENN_9225 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Buffer Protection Map.mxdDate: 1/7/2019 Time: 3:19:55 PM User: ShuJC0243 50-ft Buffer Required16.5-ft Buffer RequiredLakes, Reservoirs, and WetlandsShoreland Overlay DistrictMunicipal BoundaryParcel Boundaries 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLANMap 1-13Buffer Protected Waters Source:Buffer Protected Waters (MN DNR) Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pion e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl County R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek SouthFor kR ushCr eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Ecologically Significant Natural Areas.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 3:17:35 PMUser: ShuJC0243 Aspen ForestCattail MarshLowland hardwood forestMaple-basswood forestMesic PrairieMixed emergenct marshMixed hardwood swampOak ForestOak woodland-brushlandTamarack swampWet meadowWillow SwampMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-12Ecologically Signficant Natural Areas Source:Ecologically Significant Natural Areas (MN DNR MLCCS-2015, Natural Resource Inventoryand Management Plan, Nov. 2001, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates) 15 Afton Andover Anoka Apple Valley Arden Hills Baytown Belle Plaine Benton Bethel Blaine Blakely Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Burnsville Camden Carver Castle RockCedar Lake CentervilleChamplin Chanhassen Chaska Circle Pines Coates Cologne Columbia Heights Columbus Coon Rapids Corcoran Cottage Grove Credit River Crystal Dahlgren Dayton Deephaven Dellwood Denmark Douglas Eagan East Bethel Eden Prairie Edina Elko New Market Empire Eureka Excelsior Falcon Heights Farmington Forest Lake Fort Snelling Fridley Gem Lake Golden Valley Grant Greenfield Greenvale Greenwood Grey Cloud Island Ham Lake Hamburg Hampton Hancock Hastings Helena Hilltop Hollywood Hopkins Hugo Independence Inver Grove Heights Jackson Jordan Lake Elmo Lake Saint Croix Beach Lakeland Shores Laketown Lakeville Landfall Lauderdale Lexington Lilydale Lino Lakes Linwood Little Canada Long Lake Loretto Louisville Mahtomedi Maple Grove Maple Plain Maplewood Marine on Saint Croix Marshan May Mayer Medicine Lake Medina Mendota Mendota Heights Miesville Minneapolis Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound Mounds View New Brighton New Germany New Hope New Market New Prague New Trier Newport Nininger North Oaks North Saint Paul Northfield Norwood Young America Nowthen Oak Grove Oak Park Heights OakdaleOrono Osseo Pine Springs Plymouth Prior Lake Ramsey Randolph Ravenna Richfield Robbinsdale Rogers Rosemount RosevilleSaint Anthony Saint Bonifacius Saint Francis Saint Lawrence Saint Louis Park Saint Paul Saint Paul Park San Francisco Sand Creek Savage Scandia Sciota Shakopee Shoreview Shorewood South Saint Paul Spring Lake Spring Lake Park Stillwater Sunfish Lake Tonka Bay Vadnais Heights Vermillion Victoria Waconia Waterford Watertown Wayzata West Lakeland West Saint Paul White Bear White Bear Lake Willernie Woodbury Young America Anoka County Washington County Hennepin County Ramsey County Carver County Dakota County Scott County §¨¦394 §¨¦494 §¨¦694 §¨¦94 §¨¦35 §¨¦694 §¨¦35E §¨¦394W §¨¦35W §¨¦35 §¨¦35W §¨¦94 §¨¦694 §¨¦35E Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 10 0 105 Miles ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Regional Setting.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 8:53:48 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryCounty BoundariesMinor Civil DivisionsInterstate Map 1-1Regional Setting 17 Afton Andover Anoka Apple Valley Arden Hills Baytown Belle Plaine Benton Bethel Blaine Blakely Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Burnsville Camden Carver Castle RockCedar Lake CentervilleChamplin Chanhassen Chaska Circle Pines Coates Cologne Columbia Heights Columbus Coon Rapids Corcoran Cottage Grove Credit River Crystal Dahlgren Dayton Deephaven Dellwood Denmark Douglas Eagan East Bethel Eden Prairie Edina Elko New Market Empire Eureka Excelsior Falcon Heights Farmington Forest Lake Fort Snelling Fridley Gem Lake Golden Valley Grant Greenfield Greenvale Greenwood Grey Cloud Island Ham Lake Hamburg Hampton Hancock Hastings Helena Hilltop Hollywood Hopkins Hugo Independence Inver Grove Heights Jackson Jordan Lake Elmo Lake Saint Croix Beach Lakeland Shores Laketown Lakeville Landfall Lauderdale Lexington Lilydale Lino Lakes Linwood Little Canada Long Lake Loretto Louisville Mahtomedi Maple Grove Maple Plain Maplewood Marine on Saint Croix Marshan May Mayer Medicine Lake Medina Mendota Mendota Heights Miesville Minneapolis Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound Mounds View New Brighton New Germany New Hope New Market New Prague New Trier Newport Nininger North Oaks North Saint Paul Northfield Norwood Young America Nowthen Oak Grove Oak Park Heights OakdaleOrono Osseo Pine Springs Plymouth Prior Lake Ramsey Randolph Ravenna Richfield Robbinsdale Rogers Rosemount RosevilleSaint Anthony Saint Bonifacius Saint Francis Saint Lawrence Saint Louis Park Saint Paul Saint Paul Park San Francisco Sand Creek Savage Scandia Sciota Shakopee Shoreview Shorewood South Saint Paul Spring Lake Spring Lake Park Stillwater Sunfish Lake Tonka Bay Vadnais Heights Vermillion Victoria Waconia Waterford Watertown Wayzata West Lakeland West Saint Paul White Bear White Bear Lake Willernie Woodbury Young America Anoka County Washington County Hennepin County Ramsey County Carver County Dakota County Scott County 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 10 0 105 Miles ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Community Designations.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 8:54:25 AMUser: ShuJC0243 AgriculturalRural ResidentialDiversified RuralRural CenterEmerging Suburban EdgeSuburban EdgeSuburbanUrbanUrban CenterMunicipal BoundaryCounty BoundariesMinor Civil Divisions Map 1-2Community Designations Source:Thrive MSP 2040 Community Designation (Metropolitan Council) 19 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Se ttle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing Land Use.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 9:15:38 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Farmstead Single Family Detached Manufactured Housing Park Single Family Attached Retail and Other Commercial Mixed Use Residential Industrial and Utility Institutional Park, Recreational or Preserve Golf Course Major Highway Agricultural Undeveloped WaterMunicipal BoundaryStreams Map 1-3Metropolitan Council Existing Land Use Source:Metropolitan Council Existing Landuse (Metropolitan Council, 2016)Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) 21 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake î î î s s [j [j ñ ñ ï ï î î s ñ ï å R u s h C r e e k RushCreek SouthFork Ru sh C r e e k Sout h Fork Rush Creek RushCreek City Hall Old Public Works Public Works Burschville School House 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Public Facilities Map.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 2:53:34 PMUser: ShuJC0243 ñ Government Building [j Public Park s Golf Course î Church ï Cemetery å School HouseMunicipal BoundaryStreamsTrailheadParcel BoundariesPublic/Semi-PublicParks/Open Space/Golf Course Lake/Open Water Map 1-4Public/Semi Public Facilities Map 23 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Street Surface Type.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 11:54:17 AMUser: ShuJC0243 MNDOT Paved (0.2 mi.)County Paved (37.5 mi.)Local Street Paved (36.0 mi)Local Street Gravel (33.9 mi.)Municipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-5Street Surface Type 25 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake ISD#279 Osseo ISD#284 Wayzata ISD#877 Buffalo-Hanover-Montrose ISD#879 Delano ISD#883 Rockford R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek Sout h Fork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\School District Boundaries.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 2:53:43 PMUser: ShuJC0243 Buffalo-Hanover-MontroseDelanoOsseoRockfordWayzataMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-6School District Boundaries Source:School District Boundaries (Minnesota Department of Education) 27 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Se ttle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Natural Resource Inventory Areas.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 1:10:39 PMUser: ShuJC0243 ^_Natural Community !(Rare Species OccurenceHigh Quality Natural Community Natural Plant Communities WetlandsWet PrairieEmergentShrubFloodplain ForestOpen WaterFlood Plain (Reed Canary Dominant) UplandsSavanna/PastureMaple/BasswoodOak ForestDisturbed WoodlandOld FieldMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-7Natural Resource Inventory Areas Note: Due to limitations of map scale, distribution and proportion of NaturalCommunity types within each colored area are approximate.Source:Natural Plant Communities, Rare Species Occurence (Natural Resource Inventory andManagement Plan, Nov. 2001, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates) 29 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Set tler s R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Soils and Topography.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 1:27:47 PMUser: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryStreamsParcel BoundariesA (Soils having a high infiltration rate)B (Moderate infiltration rate)C (Low infiltration rate)D (Very low infiltration rate)A/DB/DC/DIf a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologicgroup (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letteris for drained areas and the second isfor undrained areas.Lake/Open Water 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLANMap 1-8Hydrologic Soil Group Source:SSURGO Soils Database (Natural Resources Conservation Service) 31 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settl ers R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake U n n a m e d S t r e a m U n n a m e d C r e e k U nna m ed C reek R u s h C re ek,SouthFork SarahCr e e k RushCreek RushCreek Unna m e dCre e k U n n a m e d Creek Un n a m e d C re e k 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Water Resources.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 3:11:18 PMUser: ShuJC0243 Public Water WatercoursePublic Ditch/Altered Natural WatercoursePublic Waters BasinsNatural Environment DNRShoreland ClassificationMunicipal BoundaryParcel Boundaries Map 1-9Water Resources Source:Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)Revised National Wetland Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) 33 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek Sout h Fork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\FEMA Floodplains.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 3:12:29 PMUser: ShuJC0243 100 Year Floodplain500 Year FloodplainMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-10FEMA Floodplains Source:FEMA Floodplains (FEMA/Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) 35 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Set tler s R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek Sout h Fork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Wetland Locations and Classifications.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 3:19:04 PMUser: ShuJC0243 1 - Seasonally Flooded Basin or Flat2 - Wet Meadow3 - Shallow Marsh4 - Deep Marsh5 - Shallow Open Water6 - Shrub Swamp7 - Wooded Swamp8 - BogsMunicipal BoundaryStreamsParcel BoundariesLake/Open Water Map 1-11Wetland Locations and Classifications Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (Minnesota Departmentof Natural Resources 2009-2014) 37 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S et tler s R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Ecologically Significant Natural Areas.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 3:17:35 PMUser: ShuJC0243 Aspen ForestCattail MarshLowland hardwood forestMaple-basswood forestMesic PrairieMixed emergenct marshMixed hardwood swampOak ForestOak woodland-brushlandTamarack swampWet meadowWillow SwampMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-12Ecologically Signficant Natural Areas Source:Ecologically Significant Natural Areas (MN DNR MLCCS-2015, Natural Resource Inventoryand Management Plan, Nov. 2001, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates) 38 39 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settler s R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake Rush Creek HENN_28679 HENN_12792 Rush Creek, South Fork HENN_28672 HENN_26 HENN_11 HENN_12794 HENN_12 HENN_16 HENN_14 HENN_18 HENN_13 HENN_17 HENN_29 HENN_28 Rush Creek HENN_9224 Unnamed Creek HENN_9250 HENN_9 Rush Creek, South Fork HENN_9249 HENN_24 HENN_8 HENN_25 Rush Creek HENN_9225 HENN_27 Unnamed Creek HENN_9251 Rush Creek, South Fork HENN_9249 Unnamed Creek HENN_9228 Rush Creek HENN_9225 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Buffer Protection Map.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 3:19:55 PMUser: ShuJC0243 50-ft Buffer Required16.5-ft Buffer RequiredLakes, Reservoirs, and WetlandsShoreland Overlay DistrictMunicipal BoundaryParcel Boundaries 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLANMap 1-13Buffer Protected Waters Source:Buffer Protected Waters (MN DNR) 40 41 CHAPTER 2: LAND USE goals anD PoliCies 43 2040 lanD use anD growTh ManageMenT 44 relaTionshiP To MeTroPoliTan CounCil 44 Thrive MsP 2040 Plan foreCasTs 44 lanD use CaTegories 45 sTaging 47 growTh ManageMenT 47 ProTeCTing sPeCial resourCes 48 hisToriC PreservaTion 48 aggregaTe resourCes 48 figures 2-1 Town CenTer Plan aDoPTeD 2016 46 TaBles 2-1 2040 lanD use aCreage TaBle 44 2-2 2040 Musa DensiTy 45 2-3 resiDenTial uniTs anD DensiTy By sTaging 45 2-4 MeTroPoliTan CounCil DensiTy CalCuaTion 45 2-5 lanD use DesignaTions 45 MaPs 2-1 2040 fuTure lanD use 51 2-2 2040 sTaging Plan 53 42 43 LAND USE Goal 2: Provide a variety of housing types, styles, densities, and choices to meet the housing needs of residents. Policy 1: Provide a mix of housing types to provide for a full continuum of housing opportunities, including continued single-family growth and new opportunities for multiple family and senior housing developments. Policy 2: Provide transitions or buffering from low density and rural residential areas to higher density uses. Policy 3: Ensure that all new housing adheres to the highest standards of planning, design and construction. Goal 3: Create new land use opportunities to expand and diversify the City’s tax base by encouraging new commercial development. Policy 1: Use the Mixed Use land use designation to develop a Town Center similar to that envisioned in the Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines adopted in 2016. These guidelines will be updated to reflect the new transportation policies in this plan. Policy 2: Create performance standards for all commercial areas, including building and signage design guidelines, streetscaping, and inclusion of green space, paths, and sidewalks to connect commercial areas to neighborhoods. Policy 3: Support and promote existing businesses and new businesses that are viable and responsive to the needs of the community. Goal 4: Attract and encourage new light industrial, office-industrial, high tech and professional services, and maintain and expand existing businesses in Corcoran. Policy 1: Encourage high-end business park development that attracts medical, technology, and similar industries that provide quality employment and wages. Policy 2: Develop a market plan and strategy aimed at creating an industrial and high-end business park identity that will help recruit business and industry to Corcoran. Policy 3: Create industrial and business park building, signage, and landscaping design guidelines that will result in high-quality building and site development. Policy 4: Encourage use of “green”, environmentally-friendly building and site development techniques in new developments through zoning requirements or incentives. Goal 5: Create a community with housing, employment and service uses that reinforce the City’s vision to allow development while working to retain key elements that define our rural character, such as wetlands, streams, wooded areas, natural topography and view corridors. Policy 1: Create a land use plan that provides housing development types and locations required to meet the community’s projected needs. Policy 2: Create a staging plan that supports infrastructure expansion and land use growth plans. Policy 3: Work with neighboring communities to ensure an integrated plan that is consistent with the Metropolitan Council’s requirements and compatible with adjacent jurisdictions. Policy 4: As development proceeds, protect the natural features, slopes, and sensitive areas that make Corcoran unique, such as streams, wetlands, lakes, woodlands, natural open space, and local parks. Policy 5: Prepare long-range transportation and infrastructure plans that will direct and support growth and allow the City to financially plan for such growth. Policy 6: Expand the level of community services to keep pace with orderly development. Goal 6: Ensure that zoning and subdivision ordinances are consistent with the intent and specific direction of the land use plan. Policy 1: Ensure that developers are aware of and perform according to the land use plan and all official controls. Policy 2: Encourage creative approaches to land development to support preservation of open space and natural resources. Policy 3: Coordinate plans for housing with plans for light industrial, office/ industrial, and commercial areas to balance land uses, serve the quali- ty-of-life needs of the residential areas and foster a positive climate for business, jobs, and tax base growth. Policy 4: Ensure compatibility of adjacent land uses. Policy 5: Routinely update the zoning map to conform to the land use map. The 2040 Land Use Plan identifies the location and intensity of anticipated development within the City and establishes a framework in which that development may occur. The 2040 Land Use Plan was developed to support the community vision and guiding principles discussed in Chapter 1. The 2040 Land Use Plan generally retains the land use categories created under the 2030 Plan. The MUSA boundary remains the same except for a small expansion of MUSA on Old Settlers Road in the southeast portion of the city to include all of a landowner’s property east of the street. The plan also shows a future 932-acre expansion allowing Corcoran to continue to work with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES), Loretto and Medina on the Maple Plain LS/RF Rehabilitation: Project 8081. This project would provide new facilities to serve Loretto, northwest Medina, and southwest Corcoran. This expansion is shown outside of the 2040 planning range. Corcoran will see an increased opportunity for development as the Twin Cities metropolitan area continues to grow and communities closer to the core fully develop. Corcoran’s scenic natural resource areas, proximity to rapidly growing neighboring communities, the development of the Highway 55 corridor, and the potential linking of County Road 30 with the future Highway 610 corridor all represent development assets, influences, and pressures. The 2040 Plan seeks to create the flexibility to respond to market conditions while guiding land uses that adhere to the community’s vision and guiding principles. The 2040 Land Use and Staging Plans meet the Metropolitan Council forecasts for potential development and provide methods through land use and density to meet the Metropolitan Council’s residential density guidance of 3.0 housing units per net developable acre. As a regional planning organization, the Metropolitan Council’s role is to ensure that regional infrastructure can accommodate Corcoran’s potential growth and growth within the region. Meeting this minimum density requirement ensures that regional infrastructure is used in a cost-effective and efficient manner. goals and PoliCies The community has established the following Goals and Policies to guide residential development in Corcoran. Goal 1: Ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses and has access to key community features, natural features, and views of open spaces. Policy 1: Establish development guidelines for appropriate amount of green spaces, viewshed analysis, paths, sidewalks, trails, and connections throughout the community. Policy 2: Link residential neighborhoods via trails to City parks, Town Center, and other public and commercial areas. Policy 3: Incorporate preservation of natural resources in residential developments. Policy 4: Encourage innovation in subdivision design, such as clustering techniques, to preserve open space or natural features. Policy 5: Undeveloped single-family residential land shall be developed with consideration for surrounding development and in a manner responsive to market needs. 44 2040 land use and groWth management rElationshiP to MEtroPolitan council thrivE MsP 2040 Plan In addition to guiding Corcoran’s future growth, the community’s 2040 Land Use Plan also relates to growth and development in the region as a whole. As part of the 7-county metropolitan area, Corcoran is expected to absorb its share of the region’s growth. The Comprehensive Plan must demonstrate the City’s capacity to absorb this growth. The Comprehensive Plan must also demonstrate that this growth will be managed to ensure efficient use of the region’s sewer and transportation infrastructure. The City has prepared a plan that responds to both the community’s goals as well as the Metropolitan Council’s strategies for developing communities, as outlined in Thrive MSP 2040. The 2040 Plan adequately addresses community goals and regional strategies for the following reasons: • The Plan identifies areas of low, medium, mixed and high density residential land use to expand housing densities and create opportunities for life-cycle and affordable housing. • The Plan designates areas for mixed use development to accommodate retail, commercial, and housing uses to improve access to jobs and other services. • The Plan protects natural resource areas by identifying sensitive areas and planning development accordingly. The Plan identifies strategies and policies to protect natural resource areas. • The plan protects the quality and quantity of water resources. • The Plan designates higher density housing opportunities along major transportation corridors to increase efficiency of the region’s transportation system and take advantage of future transit opportunities. • The plan creates opportunities for a variety of transportation methods, including automobile, walking, and bicycling. • The plan provides opportunities for economic development by providing areas for commercial, office, and industrial uses throughout the City. • The Plan achieves a minimum net density of 3 units/acre to ensure the region’s infrastructure is used efficiently. ForEcasts Corcoran is a unique community with a large amount of desirable undeveloped land. Due to its undeveloped nature, recent availability of municipal services, and the current economic state at the time of 2040 Plan preparation, it is a challenge for both the Metropolitan Council and the City to accurately anticipate the City’s rate of growth. The 2040 forecasts are shown in Chapter 1, Figure 1-5. The potential number of housing units that could be accommodated in the 2040 urban service area exceeds the population and housing forecasts. The excess capacity of the 2040 service area will provide greater development flexibility as growth occurs. However, the City will manage development and the pace of growth based on the forecasts. It must be recognized that these figures present the urban service area only and do not provide projections for housing units and population over the entire City. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) sewer system has been extended into the City, which has allowed new residential development in the southeast portion of the City and provided services to the existing industrial park in 2017. The availability of sanitary sewer increases opportunities for variety of residential densities and mixed residential uses, increasing housing options, and life-cycle housing in the community. It expands the City’s ability to compete for commercial, industrial, and employment opportunities. The 2040 Land Use Plan will guide and manage development pressure and growth by determining future land uses, development intensity, and areas for environmental protection. This Chapter establishes growth management strategies for the City to ensure that adequate infrastructure is in place to accommodate new growth and maintain a balance between residential and non-residential development. Urban uses and densities are focused in 3 areas of the City. The balance of the community is to remain Rural/Ag Residential, as defined below. taBle 2-1: 2040 land use aCreage taBle 2040 Future Land Use Gross Acres Percent Total Gross Acres Net Acres Percent Total Net Acres Ag Preserve 1,588.72 9.42%2,078.36 9.48% Rural/Ag Residential 9,276.27 55.03%11,954.94 54.55% Existing Residential 1,153.70 6.84%1,586.74 7.24% Low Density Residential 2,656.56 15.76%3,694.72 16.86% Medium Density Residential 66.04 0.39%84.75 0.39% Mixed Residential 449.88 2.67%522.43 2.38% High Density Residential 80.32 0.48%128.75 0.59% Mixed Use 459.08 2.72%532.42 2.43% Rural Service/Commercial 185.69 1.10%198.15 .90% Commercial 148.38 0.88%173.81 0.79% Business Park 76.89 0.46%76.89 0.35% Light Industrial 481.22 2.85%563.34 2.57% Parks/Open Space 76.85 0.46%84.38 0.39% Public/Semi-Public 157.30 .93%235.42 % grand total 16,856.91 100.00%21,915.11 100.00% The Metropolitan Council has developed the following land use policies to guide regional land use and development: Orderly and Efficient Land Use: Align land use, development patterns, and infrastructure to make the best use of public and private investment. Natural Resources Protection: Conserve, restore, and protect the region’s natural resources to ensure availability, support public health, and maintain a high quality of life. Water Sustainability: Conserve, restore, and protect the quality and quantity of the region’s water resources to ensure ongoing availability, support public health, and maintain a high quality of life. Housing Affordability and Choice: Promote housing options to give people in all life stages and of all economic means viable choices for safe, stable, and affordable homes. Access, Mobility, and Transportation Choice: Sustain and improve a multi-modal transportation system to support regional growth, maintain regional economic competitiveness, and provide choices and reliability for the system’s users. Economic Competitiveness: Foster connected land use options to provide businesses and industries with access to materials, markets, and talent. Building in Resilience: Promote sensitive land use and development patterns to achieve Minnesota’s adopted greenhouse gas emissions goals at the regional scale and to develop local resiliency to the impacts of climate change. 45 Map 2-1: Future Land Use (See page 51 for large size map.) The City used the minimum allowed densities in each residential land use category to calculate the overall average net density of 3.11 units/acre (net density is gross land area - wetlands and land below the 100-year OHWL). The following land uses and minimum densities are displayed in Table 2-2 and Table 2-3. taBle 2-2: 2040 musa density 2040 Future Land Use Gross Acres Net Acres Density Range Minimum Units Maximum Units Existing Residential 1,586.74 1,153.70 0.5-1 577 1,154 Low Density Residential 3,694.72 2,656.56 3-5 7,970 13,283 Medium Density Residential 84.74 66.04 5-8 330 528 Mixed Residential 522.43 449.88 8-10 3,599 4,499 High Density Residential 128.75 80.32 10-30 803 2,410 Mixed Use 532.42 459.08 8-30 1,836 6,886 granD ToTal 6,549.82 4,865.58 15,115 28,760 net density (units Per aCre)3.11 taBle 2-3: residential units and density By staging area 2020-2030 2030-2040 total 2040 Future Land Use Density Range Net Acres Minimum Units Maximum Units Net Acres Minimum Units Maximum Units Net Acres Minimum Units Maximum Units Existing Residential 0.5-1 30.74 15 31 1,122.96 561 1,123 1,153.70 577 1,154 Low Density Residential 3-5 1,124.28 3,373 5,621 1,516.50 4,549 7,582 2,640.78 7,922 15,849 Medium Density Residential 5-8 48.26 241 386 17.78 89 142 66.04 330 528 Mixed Residential 8-10 205.77 1,646 2,058 244.11 1,953 2,441 449.88 3,599 5,423 High Density Residential 10-30 80.32 803 2,410 ---80.32 803 2,410 Mixed Use 8-30 459.08 1,836 6,886 ---459.08 1,836 5,494 grand total 1,948.45 7,915 17,392 2.901.35 7,153 11,289 4,849.80 15,068 30,858 density By staging 4.06 2.47 3.11 The City must demonstrate that it meets the regional density policy. The Metropolitan Council uses a slightly different calculation to determine compliance with the regional policy than the City used to evaluate the overall land supply. Because the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and development planned prior to 2030 was already determined to comply. The Metropolitan Council uses the following calculation for determining compliance of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan: • Land planned for development prior to 2030 in the 2030 Plan that continues to be planned for development by 2030 in the new 2040 Plan is excluded from the calculation. • Land planned for development prior to 2030 in the 2030 Plan that has now shifted in the Staging Plan to develop after 2030 is included in the calculation. • The land outside the 2030 MUSA that was added to the 2040 MUSA is included in the calculation. • The City may take credit for units in excess of the minimum density requirements for those developments included in the plat monitoring program (through 2016). The City may add the number of units and it gives the City some credit for approving plats that exceed the minimum densities allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. The results of the density calculation using the Metropolitan Council’s policy guidance is shown in Table 2-4. The Land Use Plan meets the minimum density of 3 units per acre for areas not approved in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. taBle 2-4: metroPolitan CounCil density CalCulation 2040 Future Land Use Net Acres Density Range Minimum Units Maximum Units Low Density Residential 127.15 3-5 381 636 Mixed Residential 1.23 8-10 10 12 Subtotal 128.38 391 648 Add Plat Monitoring Data 21 Total 128.38 -412 648 Density 3.21 5.0 land usE catEgoriEs The variety of housing opportunities available is expected to increase dramatically as Corcoran grows. The 2040 Plan continues to provide a variety and range of residential land use designations and densities. The High Density Residential and Mixed Use areas are concentrated along major transportation routes to maximize the efficiency of these routes and relieve stress on the local road system. A variety of commercial, industrial and public/semi-public land uses are provided to provide employment, retail, service and recreational opportunities to residents and landowners in Corcoran. Each of the land use categories is described below. Each of the Land use categories is described below. taBle 2-5: land use designations Land Use Category Description Rural/Ag Residential Development is agricultural and large lot residential. Area is not intended to receive municipal sewer and water. Density will not exceed 1 unit per 10 acres, except for areas developed under the flexible residential development guidelines in the Open Space & Preservation ordinance. Agricultural Preserve Specifically used to implement the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves program according to MN Statute §473H. Density will not exceed 1 unit per 40 acres. Existing Low Density Residential Existing residential neighborhoods within the MUSA area. These areas are developed at approximately 1 unit per 2 acres and are not intended to be redeveloped. Low Density Residential Residential development at 3 to 5 units per acre. Medium Density Residential Residential development at 5 to 8 units per acre in Medium Density. Mixed Residential Residential development at 8 to 10 units per acre in Mixed Residential. High Density Residential Residential development at 10 to 30 units per acre. Mixed Use Mixed of residential, retail and office uses either within 1 building or 1 development. Commercial Retail, office and service uses Rural Service/ Commercial Commercial, service and industrial uses, including contractor’s yards and other industrial uses with outside storage. This area is not expected to have public sanitary sewer and water service within the 2040 planning period. Business Park Intended to accommodate a business campus at the northeast corner of CR 116/CR 30. Light Industrial Intended to provide a full range of industrial, manufacturing, warehousing and similar uses with limited outside storage. Public/Semi-Public Public facilities, included those owned by the City of Corcoran, semi-public facilities like places of worship and Rush Creek Golf Course. Parks/Open Space Public opens space and parks. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Count y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C re e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek SouthFor kR ushCr eek 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 4/28/2021 1/22/2023 5/26/2020 1/22/2020 1/21/2021 5/26/202010/2020 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 4/22/2020 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\2040 Future Land Use.mxdDate: 1/8/2019 Time: 7:30:58 AM User: ShuJC0243 Rural/Ag ResidentialExisting ResidentialLow Density Residential Medium Density ResidentialMixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/CommercialCommercialMixed UseBusiness ParkLight IndustrialPublic/Semi-PublicParks/Open SpaceAgricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration)Open WaterMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) 46 rural/ag rEsidEntial The Rural/Ag Residential area is the community’s largest land area and is intended to remain rural. The Metropolitan Council categorizes this area, existing outside the 2040 MUSA boundaries, as Diversified Rural. Diversified Rural areas are not within the Metropolitan Council’s Long-Term Sewer Service area. However, the Metropolitan Council is in the preliminary stages of planning a new sanitary sewer treatment facility to serve the northwest metropolitan area, including those parts of Corcoran designated as Diversified Rural. The City will continue to monitor this planning effort. The Rural/Ag Residential areas will continue to be defined by natural areas, such as wetlands and floodplains, and areas that are utilized for planted fields, pasture land, hobby farms, and large residential lots. The community must balance the desire all residents have for this rural experience with the needs of individual property owners in this area who may need to realize the value of their property now, rather than waiting for the arrival of urban services. This effort can be accomplished in part by amending the Open Space and Preservation Plat ordinance, which allows the use of smaller lots where natural resources are preserved and the development is designed to allow for future maximization of undeveloped spaces. This will allow a landowner to develop a portion of land while holding the remainder in a tract that is viable for future development. The undeveloped portion will not be held as open space for permanent conservation; rather, it will be held for future sewered densities through a temporary development agreement or deed restriction. The ordinance will also provide incentives for protecting natural resources. agricultural PrEsErvE This land use designation is specifically used to implement the requirements of the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves program. All land parcels in the Rural/Ag Residential land use designation that meet the requirements for eligibility in the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves program according to MN Statute §473H may apply to the City for enrollment. When land is removed from the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve program, the land use will revert to its underlying land use: Rural/Ag Residential outside of the MUSA and Low Density Residential in the MUSA. Existing rEsidEntial This land use designation accounts for existing residential development in the City of Corcoran at very low densities. The density for this area is 0.50, or roughly 1 unit per 2 acres. loW dEnsity rEsidEntial This land use category identifies areas for single-family detached residential development at an average density of 3 to 5 units per acre. This land use category will be Corcoran’s predominant land use inside the 2040 MUSA boundary. Residential development within or adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas will be guided as Low Density Residential to reduce development impacts to these areas. This category also includes Shamrock Golf Course and Pheasant Acres Golf Course. Low Density Residential areas will also be located contiguous to Ag/Rural Residential areas to help create a transition from the rural environment to a more urbanized land use pattern. MEdiuM dEnsity rEsidEntial The intent of the Medium Density Residential district is to accommodate mid- density clusters of small lots and attached townhomes, ranging from 5 to 8 units per acre. MixEd rEsidEntial The Mixed Residential District will accommodate a range of housing types including a mix of small lot detached homes and attached side-by-side (row) or stack townhomes at a density of 8 to 10 units per acre. These medium- density housing categories are planned in areas that provide transitions to more intensive land uses, are served by higher-functioning roadways and are adjacent to other higher-density or mixed-use areas where a greater concentration of services will be provided. high dEnsity rEsidEntial The purpose of this land use district is to accommodate the development of multiplex and low- to high-rise apartment buildings and condominiums. Development will occur at a density of 10+ units per acre. Architecture, landscaping, open space, resident recreational areas, and surface water retention features are important in high density residential areas to ensure that development is appropriate and consistent with the community’s character and environmental best practices. Ideally, streets and buildings will be designed around pedestrians to accommodate alternative transportation use such as bicycles and transit. MixEd usE The intent of the Mixed Use district is to allow for developments that combine residential and commercial uses into a coordinated, planned development project. Typically, mixed use developments will include townhomes, low- and high-rise apartments, retail buildings, and offices. Development may be stacked, with office or housing units located above main floor retail space. Residential density is planned at 10 or more units per acre. Not all mixed- use developments will be required to incorporate residential units. Mixed use developments will be oriented around pedestrians rather than automobiles. By providing walkable mixed-use areas, stress on the transportation system is reduced and a “sense of place” is created. A portion of the Mixed Use designation is located on the east side of County Road 116 in what is considered the Downtown Core.This area is envisioned to provide a “main street” experience, with retail shops and service businesses mixed with residential and offices on the second floors of buildings. The Town Center is the walkable traditional neighborhood supporting the Downtown Core. The Town Center is bound by City Hall on the north, County Road 10 on the south (a small portion extends south of County Road 10 at the southeast corner of County Road 10/116), County Road 116 on the west and Maple Hill Road on the east. The Town Center is intended to support the Downtown Core through walkable blocks, a variety of housing types and densities, and a unified public realm aesthetic. The Downtown Core is a subset of the Town Center and shall have additional design guidelines. Special emphasis will be placed on providing accessible destinations and inviting design. Housing, retail, and other destinations are located in or near the Downtown Core to invite walking by creating pleasant and safe routes within the Town Center. A Town Square, City Hall Park, and 1 small Neighborhood Park create additional opportunities for physical activity and social connectedness. Uses within the Town Center include: mixed use, public/semi-public, and mixed residential. The Town Center shall be developed in compliance with the standards in the Zoning Ordinance and the standards in the Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines adopted in 2016, as may be amended. This plan will be modified to reflect the transportation policy changes in this 2040 Plan, but the general principles remain unchanged. The area located between the intersections of County Road 116 and County Road 30 on the west and County Road 30 and County Road 101 on the east is also guided as Mixed Use. Future connecting improvements to County Road 30 will enhance its role as a major east-west corridor to Highway 610 in Maple Grove. This General Mixed Use District will likely include a mix of uses, including commercial and retail services and offices. The Zoning Ordinance establishes the Downtown Mixed Use and General Mixed Use district to support this land use designation. The Zoning Ordinance provides 2 distinct districts to acknowledge the uniqueness of each area. Within the district zoning standards, site and design performance standards have established to support the vision and concept plans developed for each of the mixed use areas. Additionally, design guidelines have been adopted as part of the Zoning Ordinance for each of these areas. The City expects approximately 1/2 of these areas to develop with residential uses at a variety of densities but the City will plan for 8-30 units per acre on average. coMMErcial The areas are intended for development only when sanitary sewer and water are available. In addition to this land use category, additional commercial opportunities will be available within Rural Service/Commercial Mixed Use and Business Park districts. Development of Commercial areas should include architectural themes and high-quality designs that reflect the rural character of the City as defined by the adopted Design Guidelines. Building designs and materials promoting this aesthetic, and details such as planting beds, ornamental fencing, decorative lighting, and sidewalks, will be required in Commercial areas. rural sErvicE/coMMErcial Located at the intersection of County Road 10 and County Road 19, the Rural Service/Commercial category provides a separate and distinct area for commercial land use. This area is intended to continue as a rural service area with commercial uses that may be maintained utilizing individual septic systems or approved alternative systems. This area is not expected to have public sanitary sewer and water service within the 2040 planning period. This area will have less strict building and site development standards than other commercial areas to allow for contractors’ yards and similar uses. The area can provide a relocation opportunity within the City for businesses that would not typically locate in high land- value areas. Zoning regulations will be developed to address the minimum design standards and specific screening requirements for this unique land use. BusinEss Park The Business Park category is intended to accommodate large office buildings and corporate campus developments, medical offices, technology centers, or light-industrial and office-warehouse developments that require larger sites. The Business Park district is located on County Road 30 east of County Road 116 and reflects the anticipated, substantial increases in traffic through the County Road 30 corridor to the planned, final stretch of Highway 610. These traffic levels will increase visibility for a business park and support the vision for this corridor as a major employment center. Figure 2-1: Town Center Plan 47 light industrial The Light Industrial category is intended to provide areas for manufacturing, warehousing, automotive, trucking, office, and other related industrial uses. These uses typically are not viewed as compatible with residential or some commercial uses. Parks/oPEn sPacE and PuBlic/sEMi-PuBlic land usE catEgoriEs These categories include Rush Creek golf course, all places of worship, the City Hall, Public Works, all public parks and land owned by the Rockford School District. staging The Metropolitan Council asks developing cities to provide anticipated rates of growth in 5-year increments. In its Thrive MSP 2040 vision plan, the Metropolitan Council defines strategies for developing communities to implement the policies. These strategies include the following: • Stage local infrastructure and development plans to accommodate 20 years’ worth of forecasted growth. • Select and implement local controls and tools for timing and staging of development throughout the community. • Adopt ordinances or policies to accommodate growth and use land and infrastructure efficiently. • Identify areas reserved for future urban development and develop strategies to minimize development in those areas that could preclude future urban development. • Plan for necessary infrastructure improvements. Development of a staging plan also provides several benefits to the City. A staging plan: • Creates an orderly, logical growth pattern based on development patterns and availability of infrastructure. • Allows for a connected transportation network. • Clearly defines when land is available for development. • Allows the City greater control over the pace and location of new development and the provision of necessary services. • Provides greater ability to plan, budget, and set goals for future development. The Staging Plan reflects anticipated sewer service areas located in the 3 corners of the City, where regional interceptors will be extended from adjacent communities. The Staging Plan boundaries follow the 2040 Land Use Plan boundaries. Areas outside the Staging Plan boundaries are the Rural/Ag Residential land use category, where development polices will be created to provide flexibility for development while preserving large land areas for future urbanization. The 2040 Staging Plan is displayed in Map 2-2. Future land uses are broken down by staging areas and presented below in Map 2-1. Density assumptions were included to estimate the potential number of housing units to be accommodated in each staging area. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl County R oa d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blu e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C r e ek RushCreek South F o r k RushCreek SouthForkRushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\2040 Staging.mxdDate: 1/15/2019Time: 1:20:46 PMUser: ShuJC0243 2020-20252025-20302030-20352035-2040SE/NE District Gravity Connector TrunkMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 2-22040 Staging Plan Map 2-2: 2040 Staging Plan (See page 53 for large size map.) It is important to note, similar to the 2040 Land Use Plan, the Staging Plan total for each 5-year period represents total potential units based solely on the low end of the density range calculated by total net acres. The allowed pace of development will be based on the population and housing forecasts presented in Chapter 1, with an average of 230 units/year over the 20-year life of the plan. groWth ManagEMEnt groWth FraMEWork The City Council authorized an extensive public participation process for the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. In the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, a large area of the City was added to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) to accommodate anticipated exponential growth. Since that time, growth has been less than anticipated and Metropolitan Council forecasts have been adjusted to reflect market conditions. The MUSA intentionally includes more land than is needed to accommodate the forecasted growth. This policy was adopted as part of the 2030 plan to allow landowners and the City the flexibility to allow development to respond to market demand within the framework of this plan. The City of Corcoran seeks to promote a more efficient use of land to allow the City to balance the demand for urban services and the ability of the City to provide those services in a fiscally and environmentally responsible manner. The City will create a Growth Management Policy that will manage development based on the timing and sequence illustrated in the 2040 Sanitary Sewer Service Staging Plan. The Growth Management Policy will serve as a tool to determine when an area will open for development. A multitude of factors may cause certain areas of the City to develop at a faster rate than others. This Policy is intended to implement the Sanitary Sewer Service Staging Plan while at the same time provide flexibility to address unpredictable market conditions. Another goal of the Growth Management Policy is to ensure that the City possesses sufficient administrative capacity to conduct the permitting and construction supervision processes. City staff is responsible for assessing adherence to the Comprehensive Plan, enforcing standards and requirements contained in codes and ordinances, determining that all the necessary public infrastructure and services either are in place or will be built, and ensuring that proposed development will not place a disproportionate economic burden on the community. It is essential that City staff has adequate capability to ensure that these requirements are met, consistent with City, regional and State laws, policies and regulations. The Growth Management Plan may include the following guidelines: • A certain percentage of the net developable area in a current staging area must be platted, and a certain percentage of these platted lots must have received Certificates of Occupancy before development will be allowed in subsequent or other staging areas. Staging in different districts will be considered independent of one another. • A development ratio of non-residential to residential acreage may be required to manage tax base and infrastructure debt the City may incur with new development. • Feasibility studies will be required to identify utility and transportation improvements necessary to support new development. • Developer commitments to pay costs associated with development will be obtained. • The City will evaluate land availability in each staging phase and the pace of growth as it relates to forecasts on an annual basis, or more frequently if warranted, to determine remaining development capacity within each staging area. The Growth Management Policy may allow acceleration in staging if: • A large-scale master planned project is located within both the current and next staging area and adequate infrastructure is in place or will be available to accommodate growth within the next staging area. • A unique development project is proposed that achieves significant public benefits such as substantial preservation or restoration of natural resource areas, open space, park and/or trail dedication in excess of requirements; unique and desirable life-cycle or affordable housing opportunities; or greater tax base diversification. Any development in an area prior to the designated staging phase will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 48 ProteCting sPeCial resourCes State law requires that comprehensive plans include strategies for protection of special resources including historic preservation and aggregate (mined) resources. These strategies are discussed below. historic PrEsErvation The Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Stat. 473.859 Subd. 2) requires that local comprehensive plans include a historic preservation element. Historic assets help to promote community pride and create a sense of community. The City of Corcoran values its historic assets and has developed this comprehensive plan to preserve the longstanding pattern of land use that makes Corcoran a unique place to live and work. To support this goal, the City will work toward the creation of an inventory of historically significant buildings, sites, landscape features and other landmarks. This process will include the evaluation of possible tools that can be applied to ensure preservation of these elements, including recognition, public communication and education and, where appropriate, public acquisition. aggrEgatE rEsourcEs The Metropolitan Council requires cities to identify the location of aggregate resources within the community based on the Minnesota Geological survey within the Comprehensive Plan. No aggregate resources were identified in the City of Corcoran. 49 51 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthFor k R ush C r eek 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 4/28/2021 1/22/2023 5/26/2020 1/22/2020 1/21/2021 5/26/202010/2020 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 4/22/2020 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\2040 Future Land Use.mxd Date: 1/8/2019Time: 7:30:58 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Rural/Ag ResidentialExisting ResidentialLow Density Residential Medium Density ResidentialMixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/CommercialCommercialMixed UseBusiness ParkLight IndustrialPublic/Semi-PublicParks/Open SpaceAgricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration)Open WaterMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) 53 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Se ttler s R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\2040 Staging.mxd Date: 1/15/2019Time: 1:20:46 PMUser: ShuJC0243 2020-20252025-20302030-20352035-2040SE/NE District Gravity Connector TrunkMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 2-22040 Staging Plan 54 55 CHAPTER 3: HOUSING goals anD PoliCies 57 housing assessMenT 57 housholD foreCasTs 57 housing DeveloPMenT TrenDs 57 housing PriCes anD renTs 58 housing neeDs 59 afforDaBle housing 59 life CyCle housing 60 figures 3-1 PoPulaTion anD householD growTh 57 3-2 CorCoran’s housing sToCk 58 3-3 BuilDing PerMiTs 58 3-4 age of housing sToCk 58 3-5 MeDian housing value 58 3-6 CorCoran housing value 59 3-7 MeDian gross renT 59 3-8 householDs exPerienCing CosT BurDen 60 3-9 owner oCCuPieD housing By esTiMaTeD 60 MarkeT value TaBles 3-1 PoPulaTion anD householD groTh 57 3-2 CorCoran’s housing sToCk 58 3-3 MeDian housing value 58 3-4 exisTing uniTs afforDaBle By 59 housholD inCoMe 3-5 afforDaBle housing neeD alloCaTion 59 56 57 The condition, affordability and availability of housing affects the social and economic health of every City. Corcoran has the opportunity to provide opportunities for housing options that will meet the needs of current and future residents. Housing should meet the needs of individuals and families throughout their lives, including single-family detached homes, townhomes, condominiums, apartments and senior housing. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan identified a need to plan for and manage the development of a variety of housing types to ensure that development occurs in an efficient and cost-effective manner and represents an enhancement to, and not a negative impact on, existing residential neighborhoods. The 2040 Land Use Plan continues to provide housing opportunities for Corcoran’s entire population (singles, families, and senior residents) through a variety of residential land uses and densities, including medium density, mixed residential, high density and mixed-use areas. The purpose of the Housing Plan is to establish plans and programs to meet the existing and projected housing needs in Corcoran. The Plan will guide the community’s integration of housing goals and policies into land use, infrastructure, community development, transportation, and natural resource decisions. This Housing Plan satisfies the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and stipulations of MN Statute §473.859, Subd 2(c) and Subd 4. The plan includes background information on current housing supply and an assessment of current and future housing needs. Chapter 11 of the Comprehensive Plan includes implementation strategies for the Housing Plan and other plan chapters. goals and PoliCies The vision statement, as described in Chapter 1, defines what the City of Corcoran should look like in the future. The goals and policies guide the Housing Plan to help achieve that vision for housing development. The goals and policies that follow were developed from the goals and policies prepared in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and reaffirmed for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. These goals and policies are listed below and are considered the City’s Housing Action Plan. Goal 1: Provide a healthy variety of housing types, styles, densities and choices to meet the housing needs of residents. Policy 1: Provide a mix of housing types to provide housing opportunities, including continued single-family growth and new opportunities for multiple family and senior housing developments. Policy 2: Periodically review land use regulations to determine the effectiveness of current ordinances in encouraging additional affordable units as well as encouraging modifications to keep existing housing stock desirable and livable. Policy 3: Allow the creative use of site planning or Planned Unit Developments (PUD) to provide flexibility for development containing affordable housing, such as a reduction in lot size, setbacks, street width, floor area and parking requirements. Policy 4: Encourage innovative subdivision design, including clustering techniques to preserve open space or natural features. Policy 5: Promote development of neighborhood life-style centers that incorporate housing in a range of densities and affordability limits in close proximity to shopping, services, daycare, and medical services. Life-style design should include safe access to parks and schools and the ability to walk, bike, or have access to transit. Policy 6: Consider developing a list of available resources and providers of in-home services to older adults and those with special needs. Policy 7: The City supports preservation of the Maple Hill Estates manufactured home park as an affordable housing option in Corcoran. Goal 2: Promote housing rehabilitation. Policy 1: Support first-time homebuyers’ programs to assist new homeowners entering the market for existing homes. Policy 2: Consider supporting and actively promoting housing rehabilitation programs for existing owner-occupied homes and rental buildings or units. This includes promotion of all County and State programs and non-profit programs. Policy 3: Consider utilizing the City’s website, newsletter, and other sources for promotion and advertising of housing programs. Policy 4: Consider creation of a housing maintenance code to maintain existing housing stock. Policy 5: Consider programs that encourage maintenance of existing houses, including a housing remodeling fair, neighborhood watch programs, City beautification programs, and City-wide clean-up programs. Goal 3: Improve the availability of affordable housing and senior housing. Policy 1: Developers should be encouraged to address the provision of affordable housing within all new residential developments within the 2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Policy 2: Consider participation in the Livable Communities Act Local Housing Incentives Program. Policy 3: Utilize techniques such as land trusts to maintain long-term affordability. Policy 4: Partner with, support and market programs offered by the County, State, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Federal government, and non- profits to fund the development of affordable housing. Increase the housing options available for housing developments. housing assessment housEhold ForEcasts Corcoran will continue to plan infrastructure and housing investments to meet the projected growth over the next 20 years. The City’s housing supply should be diverse and consist of a variety of styles and price ranges to allow residents the option of living in Corcoran their entire lives, and to provide the opportunity for their children to do the same. housing dEvEloPMEnt trEnds Table 3-1 and Figure 3-1 show Corcoran population and household growth since 1970 and forecasts through 2040. Each new household represents a new housing unit added to the community. taBle 3-1: PoPulation and household groWth Year Household Population 1970 407 1,656 1980 1,243 4,252 1990 1,545 5,199 2000 1,784 5,630 2010 1,867 5,379 2017 1,957 5,592 2020 2,500 6,700 2030 3,570 8,900 2040 4,700 11,300 Source: Metropolitan Council, March 2018, Local Planning Handbook HOUSING 58 Corcoran’s current housing stock consists primarily of rural residential and large lot detached single-family homes. As of the 2010 Census, the City contained 1,919 total housing units. Of these units, 186 are manufactured homes located in the City’s mobile home park. The City of Corcoran has only recently been able to provide municipal sewer and water, which will allow the City to implement the City’s vision to provide a variety of housing types, including a variety of apartments, condominiums and townhomes. The land use plan provides areas for medium and higher density residential development, which can accommodate these types of uses and provide housing options for Corcoran residents. An inventory of the City’s housing stock, by number of dwelling units within a structure, is provided in Table 3-2 and Figure 3-2. taBle 3-2: CorCoran’s housing stoCk 1990 2000 2010 2017 Single-Family Detached 1,364 1,614 1,731 1,843 Townhomes (Single-Family Attached)11 19 0 0 Duplex, triplex and quad 14 7 2 2 Manufactured Home 171 171 186 181 Other (Boat, RV, etc.)4 --- granD ToTal 1,564 1,811 1,919 2,026 Source: Decennial Census and Metropolitan Council Housing Stock 2017 The City issued 198 new construction building permits between 2010 and 2017. The number of building permits issued per year since 2001 is shown in Figure 3-3. Corcoran’s housing stock is generally in good condition. Details on the age of Corcoran’s housing stock are presented in Figure 3-4. A majority of homes (50 percent) in Corcoran were constructed in the 1970s and 1980s. Only 10 percent of the housing stock was constructed prior to 1939. As a result, Corcoran sees fewer housing maintenance issues than many older communities. housing PricEs and rEnts According to the 2010 Census, 91 percent (1,740) of housing units in Corcor- an were owner-occupied and 6 percent (127) were renter-occupied, with 3 percent (52) of the units being vacant.. Table 3-3 and Figure 3-5 show the median housing value in Corcoran compared to Hennepin County and the greater metropolitan area from 1990 to 2017. taBle 3-3: median housing value 1990 2000 2010 2017 Corcoran $105,600 $187,300 $318,500 $304,500 Hennepin County $90,600 $143,400 $247,900 $245,400 Minneapolis-St. Paul, Bloomington, MN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area $88,300 $141,200 $239,100 $230,700 Source: Decennial Census (1990/2000) and American Community Survey 5 Year Summary File (2010/2017) 59 Another source for housing prices are Certificates of Real Estate Value filed with the Minnesota Department of Revenue when owner-occupied housing units are sold. The value (sale price) of owner-occupied housing units sold in Corcoran, during the years 2010-2016, is presented in Figure 3-6. Renter occupied units account for a small portion of the current housing in Corcoran. Figure 3-7 displays the median gross rent for these units. housing needs aFFordaBlE housing As part of the 2040 Regional Development Framework, the Metropolitan Council estimated that approximately 37,900 additional affordable housing units will be needed in the region during the planning period of 2021-2030. As part of Thrive 2040, the housing policy plan defines affordable housing as housing affordable to those householders earning 80 percent of area median income. According to Metropolitan Council 2017 Affordability Limits, the area median income for the 7-county Minneapolis-St. Paul (MSP) area adjusted by HUD to be applicable to a family of 4 was $90,400 in 2017. A family of 4 at 80 percent of this figure earns $72,320 and would be able to afford a home at a purchase price of $236,000 in 2018. Table 3-4 shows a breakdown of the number of units affordable by household income for Corcoran. taBle 3-4: existing units affordaBle By household inCome Units Percent of All Units Affordable to Households with Income at or below 30 percent of AMI (less than or equal to $27,120) 121 6% Affordable to Households with Income 31percent to 50 percent of AMI (over $27,100 and less than or equal to $45,200) 68 4% Affordable to Households with Income 51percent to 80 percent of AMI (over $45,200 and less than or equal to $72,320) 552 28% Affordable to Households with Income Above 80 percent of AMI (over $72,320)1227 62% Total Housing Units 1968 100% Source: Metropolitan Council, March 2018, Corcoran Existing Housing Assessment, Local Planning Handbook Currently there are approximately 732 homesteads in Corcoran valued at or below $236,000 (Hennepin County assessor’s data/GIS). Using the total of 1,919 housing units from 2010 Census data, these 732 homesteads account for approximately 38 percent of the City’s housing stock. Corcoran does not currently have any publicly subsidized units available. Most of the affordable housing at less than 50 percent AMI comes from the Maple Hill Estate manufactured home park in Corcoran. The manufactured home park is a recipient of the Metropolitan Council’s Manufactured Home Park Preservation Grant, which has a goal of connecting the home park to the regional wastewater treatment center by matching up to 50% of the associated costs. This connection is expected to take place in 2019. There is uncertainty associated with the extent to which future buyers will view a home as an investment and the amount of any premium they will be willing to pay for the benefits of ownership versus rental. While recent drops in interest rates and lower home prices have increased the availability of affordable housing options, changes in mortgage lending practices create new obstacles for lower income households to obtain financing. It is clear that jobs and income levels are the driving force in demand and sustainability. The Metropolitan Council has allocated a certain number of affordable housing units to be provided between 2021 and 2030 for each community within the region, based on the following 4 criteria: • Household growth potential • Ratio of local low-wage jobs to low-wage workers • Current provision of affordable housing • Transit service Based on their analysis, the Metropolitan Council’s affordable housing need for Corcoran is to create 377 new affordable housing units between 2021 and 2030. Table 3-5 shows the affordable housing units broken down into the three bands of affordability. The affordable housing allocation accounts for approximately 23 percent of the forecasted housing added from 2021 to 2030. The affordability limit is 80 percent of area median income for both owner-and renter-occupied housing units. taBle 3-5: affordaBle housing need alloCation Income Range Number of Units At or Below 30% AMI 152 From 31 to 50% AMI 168 From 51 to 80% AMI 57 Total Units 377 Source: Metropolitan Council To provide opportunities for affordable housing in the community, the City is taking the appropriate regulatory measures within the Comprehensive Plan by guiding areas for higher density housing and including policies to promote affordable housing in residential land use areas. In Chapter 2, Table 2-3 shows the land use intended to develop between 2021 and 2030 that can address the affordable housing need. Guiding land at greater densities increases opportunities for affordable housing, as per-unit land and development costs decrease when density rises. While the City is doing its part in creating a Land Use Plan to guide areas for higher density housing, barriers to development of affordable housing still exist in Corcoran and the region. Some of these barriers are beyond the City’s control and include the following: • Steady increases in land prices and construction costs. • Physical limitations of land due to wetlands, poor access, and poor soils that would increase the cost of development or construction. • State, County and local tax structures. • Lack of transportation and employment infrastructure. 60 Corcoran will promote affordable housing most effectively by adopting and enforcing land use and zoning standards that do not impede or deter affordable housing. Metropolitan Council defines a cost burdened household as one that is spending 30 percent or more of their annual household income on housing. The data on the percentage of owner and renter households in Corcoran that are classified as cost burdened is displayed in Figure 3-8. A factor that contributes to the significant drop in cost burdened renters is the drop in average rent for Corcoran from 2010 to 2016 shown in Figure 3-8. This drop lowers the percentage of income spent on housing enough that most renters are no longer considered cost burdened. There are various housing finance tools available to the City of Corcoran and its residents to address the different housing needs. The following tools are housing finance options available to the city: Local Sources of Funding • Housing Bonds • Tax Abatement • Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Federal and Regional Sources of Funding • Consolidated Request for Proposals – Minnesota Housing Finance Agency • Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) – U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development • HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development • Affordable Housing Incentive Fund (AHIF) – Hennepin County liFE-cyclE housing Life-cycle housing is defined as housing that meets the housing needs of individuals and families throughout their lives. Generally, people desire diverse types of housing at various stages of their life-cycle. Usually, people between the ages of 0 and 19 are students living with their parents. Those between the ages of 20 and 24 are often renters and do not often become first time home-buyers until they reach the ages of 25 to 34. First-time homebuyers (25-34) and move-up renters often prefer to purchase modestly- priced single-family homes, townhomes, or rent upscale apartments. People aged 35 to 49 often are in their peak earning years and can afford to buy a larger home with more amenities, referred to as move-up housing. Empty nesters are usually between the age of 50 and 64 and many of them may decide to downsize to a smaller housing unit, as with younger seniors (between the ages of 65 to 74). This choice may include renting a multi- family unit, purchasing a lower-maintenance multi-family housing product such as a condominium or townhome, or purchasing a home in a retirement community. Older seniors (74 and above) may begin to require some level of assisted housing. sEnior housing As the community ages, there will be an increase in demand for smaller, low maintenance housing designed for the senior population. This demand might be accommodated through a variety of townhouse styles or apartments in mixed use settings. Empty nesters are a particularly active group on the younger end of the senior age range and locating developments near some of Corcoran’s natural amenities and retail/service areas will be enticing to this group. For seniors, no longer able to live alone, supportive housing options such as assisted living or memory care units will be needed. Corcoran Dayton Greenfield Hanover Independence Loretto PlymouthMedina Maple Grove Rogers - 1/5/2018 .1 in = 0.97 miles Owner-Occupied Housing by Estimated Market Value - Corcoran FIGURE 3-9 County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries Streets Lakes and Rivers Owner-Occupied Housing Estimated Market Value, 2016 $243,500 or Less $243,501 to $350,000 $350,001 to $450,000 Over $450,000 Source: MetroGIS Regional Parcel Dataset, 2016 estimated market values for taxes payable in 2017. Note: Estimated Market Value includes only homesteaded units with a building on the parcel. 61 62 63 CHAPTER 4: ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS goals anD PoliCies 65 eConoMiC assessMenT 65 eConoMiC DeveloPMenT oPPorTuniTies 66 figures 4-1 nuMBer of JoBs loCaTeD in CorCoran 65 4-2 eMPloyMenT By inDusTry 65 4-3 foreCasTeD eMPloyMenT in CorCoran 65 4-4 average annual wages 66 4-5 CorCoran MeDian householD inCoMe 66 TaBles 4-1 CorCoran ToP Ten workPlaCes for 66 resiDenTs in 2015 64 65 This Chapter identifies strategies to increase commercial and industrial development in the City of Corcoran. Economic health is an important component of a healthy and thriving community. A strong commercial and industrial base provides jobs to community residents, contributes to a community’s tax base, and can be a source of psychological strength to a community. Commercial and industrial development will provide additional revenue for the City, which currently relies largely on residential property taxes for revenue. Commercial and industrial tax base will fund increased City services prompted by City growth. The 2040 Plan recognizes the inherent link between commercial development and the availability of skilled and educated workers, affordable housing, developable land and infrastructure. goals and PoliCies The City of Corcoran recognizes the importance of each component of the economic development cycle in the overall health and economic stability of the community. The City addresses economic development issues through the following goals and policies: Goal 1: Promote cooperative efforts and utilize existing resources for economic growth in the City. Policy 1: Continue to identify and tap into local, State and Federal resources to enhance economic development. Policy 2: Explore County-wide economic development coordination options. Policy 3: Promote coordination of the educational system and the business community to ensure the availability of qualified workers. Goal 2: Promote economic stability and diversity to provide job opportunities to residents. Policy 1: Support efforts to retain existing businesses and facilitate their expansion. Policy 2: Support efforts to recruit new businesses and industries in appropriate locations. Policy 3: Recognize the need to expand infrastructure in the City, including but not limited to roadways, parks/trails, utilities and telecommunications infrastructure, to support and promote continued economic development. Policy 4: Target financial resources and programs to attract businesses that have an emphasis on job creation and businesses that meet or exceed livable wage requirements. Policy 5: Encourage the availability of a range of housing types and values to accommodate an ample work force. Goal 3: Promote efficient, planned commercial and industrial development. Policy 1: Identify key commercial and industrial development opportunities in planned growth areas at locations with access to major transportation systems. Policy 2: Encourage and facilitate infill development on vacant parcels to ensure maximum efficiency of land use. Policy 3: Encourage compact commercial developments that will make efficient use of infrastructure and resources. Policy 4: Encourage industrial, office, business and commercial development to locate within master planned industrial parks, business parks, or in the Town Center area. Goal 4: Enhance the character of the City’s commercial and industrial development. Policy 1: Support the provision of open/green space within commercial and industrial development. Policy 2: Promote the rehabilitation and redevelopment of under utilized facilities by pursuing and making available various financial programs and assistance. eConomiC assessment Expansion of the local economy is often tied to existing employers and industries. This section analyzes the existing types of industry concentrated in the City of Corcoran and the competitive environment defined by the presence of industry in surrounding communities. Corcoran’s existing employment base is dominated by small construction- related firms. This is in contrast to the metro area, which is much more diversified in its employment base. For example, approximately 41 percent of all jobs in Corcoran are construction-related, whereas approximately 5 percent of all metro area jobs are construction-related. (DEED Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) Therefore, as Corcoran looks to expand its commercial and industrial tax base, it will need to consider ways to diversify its existing employment base. Although Corcoran’s employment base more than doubled between 1990 and 2010, it still remains well below neighboring communities, especially Rogers, Maple Grove, and Plymouth (Table 15). Because some of these communities will continue to develop in coming years, Corcoran’s employment base has been drawn back from the 4,000 job increase forcasted in the 2030 Comp Plan to approximatley 1,200 job increase in the 2040 forcasts per Metropolitan Council estimates. Most future employment locations will be in areas guided as Mixed Use and Business Park. The intensity levels of future commercial/industrial areas will include impervious coverage up to 70 percent based on City Code requirements. Additionally, buildings in these areas will continue to meet the City’s commitment to high quality site-planning, architectural design, and landscaping. ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS 66 Development in neighboring communities will continue to impact Corcoran for many years. There are several significant concentrations of commercial and industrial districts within 5 miles of Corcoran’s boundaries in neighboring cities including Rogers, Dayton, Maple Grove, Plymouth, and Medina. Most of these districts are situated at the intersection of 2 or more major highways. Each of these districts will strongly compete with any new commercial or industrial development within Corcoran for many years to come. Although commercial and industrial development has been limited in Corcoran, the City has begun to more actively pursue economic development opportunities in recent years. The City has supported development and extended municipal services to its existing commercial and industrial enterprises in the area located at County Road 116 and County Road 10. The City has identified its Town Center as a key growth area. An industrial district located in the southwest portion of the City along Highway 55 and County Road 19 is identified for development in the coming years. eConomiC develoPment oPPortunities The City anticipates the demand for commercial and industrial development will increase significantly by 2040. Therefore, the City’s Land Use Plan identifies large areas of commercial, industrial, business-park, and mixed land use that will provide for a mix of jobs, ranging from retail and commercial service jobs to high end technology jobs. The City’s development plan for its downtown area provides an opportunity for additional economic development. The City has guided this area for Mixed Use on the 2040 Land Use Plan, providing flexibility for future development. The development plan is intended to promote investment in Corcoran’s downtown, solidifying the area as an important community asset and focal point. A future I-94 Brockton interchange planned in Dayton, and a Highway 610 interchange planned in Maple Grove, will impact the northeastern portions of Corcoran. These roadway improvements will significantly improve access to the City, making it a more desirable location for commercial and industrial development. To serve this future demand, the City has planned a large industrial/business park area and commercial/mixed use development in the northeastern portion of the City near each interchange. Additionally, expanding municipal sewer and water services will provide for increased housing opportunities in the City. The continued increase in housing units will create additional demand for commercial services. Corcoran’s parks, trails and open space system will be an integral part of the community’s life. The system will provide recreational opportunities for park system patrons, while preserving existing natural and historic resources. The parks and trails system should be authentic to the identity of the City and unify neighborhoods to reinforce a sense of community pride. CorCoran toP ten WorkPlaCes for residents in 2015 taBle 4-1 Workplace City Number of Workers Minneapolis 298 Plymouth 261 Maple Grove 183 Corcoran 121 Medina 107 Minnetonka 92 Brooklyn Park 84 St. Paul 83 St. Louis Park 76 Eden Prairie 71 Other 925 67 68 69 CHAPTER 5: PARKS AND TRAILS aPPliCaTion 71 goals anD PoliCies 71 areas ouTsiDe The 2040 MeTroPoliTan urBan 72 serviCe area (Musa) BounDary guiDelines 72 Park ClassifiCaTions 72 neighBorhooD Park 72 CoMMuniTy Park 73 loCal linear Parks, Trails, CorriDors 73 anD Parkways exisTing CiTy Parks 73 PrivaTe Park 74 Parks anD Trails loCaTions 74 fuTure Parks 74 DeMograPhiCs/CoMMuniTy growTh 74 loCal TrenDs 74 fuTure ProJeCTions By TyPe 74 fuTure Trails 75 figures 5-1 2040 Musa insiDe BounDaries 71 5-2 2040 Musa ouTsiDe BounDaries 72 5-3 CorCoran CoMMuniTy Park 73 5-4 CorCoran CiTy hall anD MeMorial Park 73 5-5 ravinia neighBhorD Park 74 5-6 CorCoran CoMMuniTy aThleTiC area 74 5-7 CorCoran lion’s Park 74 5-8 Thru 5-11 Park Trail exaMPles 75 5-12 regional BiCyCle TransPorTaTion 76 neTwork 5-13 regional Trail searCh area 76 figures ConTinueD 5-14 DiaMonD lake rT MaP 76 5-15 CounTy Bikeway sysTeM 76 5-16 ConCePTual regional Trail sysTeM 76 TaBles 5-1 ProJeCTeD aCres of Park lanD 75 5-2 CiTy anD CounTy Trail sysTeM 75 MaPs 5-1 Parks anD Trails Plan 79 70 71 Corcoran’s parks, trails and open space system will be an integral part of the community’s life. The system will provide recreational opportunities for park system patrons, while preserving existing natural and historic resources. The parks and trails system should be authentic to the identity of the City and unify neighborhoods to reinforce a sense of community pride. This plan to develop, maintain and grow the park and trail system provides a benchmark from which to make decisions as investment opportunities arise. Goals provide decision-making guidance to the City. Policies provide actionable steps the Parks and Trails Commission and policymakers can take to ensure stewardship of financial, natural, and recreational resources and create a parks and trail system that is representative of the community’s values. Diligent planning will result in: • A system where making healthy lifestyle choices is integral to daily life. • A system with quality resources and facilities that attract new development, businesses, and visitors. • A venue for strengthening community engagement by giving visitors places to gather and interact. • A community where key natural resources are protected before development occurs. • A City that is known for promoting a high quality of life. aPPliCation This Plan places emphasis on park and trail development within the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA) as new development occurs. While park and trail locations are also identified in areas outside the MUSA, plans and proposed corridors are for guidance purposes and will be implemented over the long term as development occurs and opportunities to work with landowners arise. The Parks and Trails Plan uses the City’s 2003 Natural Resource Inventory as a foundation for the park and trail system to be developed in Corcoran over the next 20 years. The plan incorporates national trends and standards as available from the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA). NRPA publishes standards to help communities in planning, acquisition and development of park and open space. In more recent years, the NRPA is encouraging communities to benchmark their metrics and enter the data into their national database. Due to the limited number of communities participating in their benchmarking program at the time of this report, it is unclear how Corcoran’s parks services compare to other communities of comparable size in Minnesota. The standards that the NRPA has used in the past provides guidance for how to place parks by park type and the general facilities you might see in each park. Figure 5-1: 2040 MUSA Inside Boundaries The area within the 2040 MUSA is the emphasis for new park and trail development. goals and PoliCies Goal 1: To implement this Parks and Trails Plan based on the needs of Corcoran residents and park system patrons. Policy 1: Apply this plan when making recommendations to City Council. Policy 2: Inform and seek input from other City advisory commissions on any issues or improvements that may be applicable to that commission. Policy 3: Respond to the increasing maintenance, planning, and recreational demands made by the City and its park system patrons. Policy 4: Track changes to the park and trail system to ensure a well- considered network. Goal 2: To work cooperatively with neighboring communities, Hennepin County, the State of Minnesota and others in planning, developing, and financing the local park system. Policy 1:Seek compatibility with adjacent local community plans and metropolitan, State and Federal plans and programs. Policy 2: Seek cooperation, coordination and participation with local school districts in planning the joint use, development, and operation of the park and trail system. Policy 3: Encourage community volunteer organizations to participate in park and trail development. Policy 4: Require park dedication from all developers (commercial, industrial and residential) in the form of cash or land, according to the Park Dedication Ordinance and the fee schedule set by the City Council. All cash will be directed to the Park Fund and will be used for park land acquisition and development projects. Policy 5: Review the park dedication formula on an annual basis to ensure it supports the needs of the park system and is comparable with area metropolitan communities. Policy 6: Acquire park land when possible, in accordance with the City’s Parks and Trails Plan to minimize costs and potential conflicts. Goal 3: To develop a park system the public values and visits. Policy 1: Design and build parks and trails early in the development process, so that they are available to new park system patrons. Policy 2: Include private parks, when planned and funded by developers, as a neighborhood feature based on the provisions of the City’s Park Dedication Ordinance. Policy 3: Maintain an equitable distribution of parks throughout the community. Policy 4: Develop a parks and trails system that is safe, enjoyable, and accessible. Policy 5: Provide multi-use and multi-seasonal programs and activities. Policy 6: Provide park system patrons with timely information regarding park and trail facilities and programs. Policy 7: Establish design standards that create unity within the park and trail system and that emphasize the character of the City, its history, and landscape. Policy 8: Park design should incorporate a general theme, but also allow diversity among parks to adapt to natural features, local history, or neighborhood character and needs. PARKS AND TRAILS Within 2040 Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA), and within the City of Corcoran Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers % Trailhead MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake CookLake 456710 456750 456719 456730 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Oakdale Dr B r i d l e Path J e f f r e y Ln Abilene Ln Tr a i l L n HuntersRdg County Road 30 Heat her Ln Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n H o r s e s h o e Bend D r Co un t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 ESt Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r ElmSt Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d County Road 1 1 7 Stie g R d Be c h t o l d R d Ka l k R d Schutte Rd Meister Rd F o x Va ll e y Dr M y s t i q u e Dr Ha ge Dr 93rd Ave N Schutte P l Br and y w ine Rd ChisholmT r l Tessmer Rd HighBluffLn WinchesterTrl JubertLn R u s h C reek RushCreek CountyDitch N u m b e r Six t e e n Cou n t y Ditch N u mberThree SouthFork Ru s h C r e ek NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP Outside 2040 Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA), but within the City of Corcoran MUSA line MUSA lineMUSA line MU S A l i n e 72 Goal 4: To develop a system of parks and trails, with a variety of active and passive uses, that reflect the special character of the City, its history, and natural resources. Policy 1: Select land for parks, trails or open space based on: a. Its designation as a park or trail search area in the Parks and Trails Plan; b. Its scenic or unique natural features; c. Its ability to support desirable wildlife populations; d. Its performance of important environmental functions; e. Its proximity to the Natural Resource Corridors identified in the Natural Resource Inventory; f. Its qualities conducive to recreational development; g. A demonstrated need for additional parkland exists in an area. Policy 2: Ensure park names reflect location by incorporating local historical names or features, a local access road, neighborhood name, benefactors, or prominent natural features of the area. Policy 3: Develop a consistent signage policy for parks system, including directional and informational signs. Policy 4: Preserve outstanding natural areas by discouraging development of prominent or highest quality landscape features and conserving natural resource areas. Protect wetlands and woodlands from undesirable impacts and fragmentation. Restore them to a high-quality condition when possible. Goal 5: To provide a safe, equitable, and convenient trail network. Policy 1: Apply this plan to coordinate development of the trail system. Policy 2: Connect future trails to existing and adjacent community trails. Policy 3: Encourage the use of utility easements and transportation right-of- ways for on-road route development. Policy 4: Respect individual property rights. Trail development and routing should be a cooperative effort between the City and the landowners along the proposed route. Existing neighborhoods are encouraged to request trails and work with the City to identify their routes. Policy 5: Require a 20-foot minimum trail easement to provide adequate bicycle and pedestrian circulation or access to schools, parks, downtown, churches, or other facilities. Policy 6: Implement safe pedestrian crossing facilities on main roadways. Policy 7: Maximize user safety by thoroughly considering conflicts between trail user groups, for example snowmobiles and equestrians. Policy 8: Continue to show snowmobile trails on the City Parks and Trails Plan. Snowmobiles are an important recreational activity for many residents. A private organization maintains the current trail system. While the City does not own or maintain these trails, the City will make applicants aware of the desire to maintain routes through the City as development occurs. areas outside the 2040 metroPolitan urBan serviCe area (musa) Boundaries guidElinEs The following guidelines will be applied to development proposals outside the 2040 MUSA boundary: • Park and trail policies in areas outside the 2040 MUSA boundary will be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Subdivision Ordinances. • Relevant development proposals will be presented to the Parks and Trails Commission before City Council approval, thereby allowing for review and recommendations regarding incorporation of trail easements, open space acquisition or park facilities. • Park facilities generally should not be planned outside the 2040 MUSA, except for: • Trails that have been identified on the Natural Resource Inventory or the Parks and Trails Plan maps. • Parks that have been identified on the Parks and Trail System map. • Protection of significant natural areas that have been identified on the Natural Resource Inventory. • Athletic facilities may be considered, but are preferred in areas closest to the 2040 MUSA. • Proposed parks and trails shown on the Parks and Trails System Map outside the 2040 MUSA areas are for guidance purposes and will be implemented over the long term as a part of new development through development dedication or cooperative purchase. Figure 5-2: 2040 MUSA Outside Boundaries The guidelines above apply to the area outside the 2040 MUSA. Park ClassifiCation Parks are divided into 1 of 3 categories: Neighborhood Park, Community Park and Linear Park. Parks may serve more than 1 purpose, for example a community park may also serve the immediate neighborhood park needs in addition to a more regional community park demand. The following park types and standards will be developed in Corcoran. nEighBorhood Park Neighborhood Parks are the most local unit of the park system, providing area for recreational activities such as field games, court games, playground, skating, and neighborhood centers. These parks prioritize user groups living in the neighborhood. They are identified as NP – Neighborhood Park on the system map. Neighborhood park sites should be in proximity to residential neighborhoods. Their design may be as simple as a playground or as intense as a public square. Siting neighborhood parks adjacent to community parks and local linear parks, corridors and parkways will expand the function of all types of open space. It will also entice residents from throughout the community to visit the park ensuring new parks do not function as private facilities for new developments. Neighborhood park development criteria generally includes: • An overall size of 5-20 acres. • A service area of 1/4 to 1/2 mile. • A physical geography suited for intense development. • A frequency of 1 neighborhood park per 5,000 residents. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers % Trailhead MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake CookLake 456710 456750 456719 456730 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Oakdale Dr B r id l e Path J e f f re y Ln Abilene Ln Tr a i l L n HuntersRdg County Road 30 He ather Ln Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n H o r s e s h o e Bend D r Co un t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 ESt Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r ElmSt Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old Sett lers R d County Road 1 1 7 Stieg R d Be c h t o l d R d Ka l k R d Schutte Rd Meister Rd F o x Valle y Dr M y s t i q u e Dr Hage Dr 93rd Ave N Schutte P l Br and y w ine Rd ChisholmT rl Tessmer Rd HighBluffLn WinchesterTrl JubertLn R u s h C reek RushCreek CountyDitch N u m b e r S ixte e n Cou n t y Ditch N u mberThree SouthFork Ru s h C r eek NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP Within 2040 Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA), and within the City of Corcoran MUSA line MU S A l i n e MUSA line MUSA line 73 coMMunity Park Community parks serve a wider user group than neighborhood parks, and are often in proximity to secondary schools and other public facilities. These parks seek to preserve unique landscapes and natural areas, and as they have a larger overall size, the programming of passive and active recreation may occur within the same park without conflict. Community park development criteria generally includes: • An overall size of 20-100 acres. • A service area of up to a 2-mile radius. • A frequency of 1 community park per 15,000 residents. In addition to the existing Corcoran Community Park at County Road 10 and 50, there are 2 other types of planned parks that will serve the wider community and fall into this category: Community Playfields and Open Space/Natural Parks. Community Playfield Community playfields, identified as ASA-Athletic Search Area on the system map, are areas for intense recreational facilities such as athletic fields and swimming pools. Playfields should be integrated into community parks or may be co-located with school athletic facilities. They may also include a neighborhood park use. oPen sPaCe/natural Parks These parks are characterized by high-quality natural resources that merit preservation and which would be negatively affected by development. They are identified as Open Space and Preservation/Nature Park on the system map. Recreational uses are secondary to the preservation of natural open space and the conservation functions of these areas. Compatible recreational uses include hiking, picnicking and nature study. Open space or natural park sites are typically within the high-quality natural community areas identified in the City’s Natural Resource Inventory. They should be connected by trails to the City’s Natural Resource Corridors and to other parks and will be left in a natural or semi-natural state, with minimal development. local linEar Parks, trails, corridors and ParkWays These areas are developed for 1 or more varying modes of recreational travel such as hiking, biking, and cross-country skiing. These features may traverse 1 or more municipality with width and length minimums varying by feature type – depending on their location within or outside right-of-way. Linear parks and trail corridors are often found adjacent to major roadways within the County or other locations where needed to link cities to components of the local or regional recreation system or community facilities such as schools, libraries, or commercial destinations. These parks may also be located in planned greenway corridors or adjacent to creeks and stream corridors to provide public access to natural features, however such development should consider site and habitat impacts. Existing city Parks (City of Corcoran owns 3 parks) The Corcoran Community Park is located at the intersection of County Roads 10 and 50. The original park was approximately 16 acres. The City purchased a 60-acre parcel from Rockford Area Schools in 2018. The 60- acre parcel is located directly west of the original park and brings the total park area to approximately 76 acres. Park facilities include a playground, tennis and volleyball courts, softball fields, ice rinks, parking and a picnic shelter. The 60-acre parcel adds additional multi-use fields and parking to the Community Park. Figure 5-3: Corcoran Community Park The City has also begun developing park land on City Hall property. The site, including the Memorial Garden, is an estimated 8 acres. Once fully developed, this park will consist of picnic facilities and trails. Figure 5-4: Corcoran City Hall and Memorial Park Corcoran Community Park - Playground - Courts (Tennis and Volleyball) - Ballfields - Ice rinks - Parking - Picnic Shelter Rockford School Property - Multi-Use Fields - Parking Parcel extents for illustrative purposes only Parcel extents for illustrative purposes only 74 Existing city Parks continuEd Wildflower Park has been dedicated as part of the Ravinia development and is owned by the City. A plan for development was approved and the park construction began in 2018. Figure 5-5: Wildflower Park PrivatE Park The Corcoran Lions Club owns a multi-use facility at the intersection of County Roads 10 and 101. This the site of the Hennepin County Fair, the Hamel Rodeo and a variety of other public entertainment events. While it is a privately owned and operated open space, the City’s Goals and Policies (see Goal 2) prioritize keep- ing open communication with such entities to ensure cooperation and thoughtful planning of the City’s parks and trails. Figure 5-6: Corcoran Lions Park Parks and trails loCations Proposed parks are identified on the 2040 Parks and Trails System Map, Map 5-1. Athletic complex and open space search areas are shown on this plan to indicate potential site areas, not exact property locations. These search areas are distributed throughout the community to aid further investigate for costs, ease of obtaining land, access and proximity to future growth and development. Many of these parks will be developed as new residential neighborhoods are constructed, increasing the need for parks. The City will work with developers and other landowners to identify the exact location and size of parks and trail alignments as development or park acquisition is proposed. The City will seek to co-locate trails with other infrastructure easements where feasible. Map 5-1: Parks and Trails Plan (See page 79 for large size map.) future Parks dEMograPhics/coMMunity groWth The 2040 Comprehensive Plan uses the population forecasts and the context presented to recommend the number and distribution of park and trail facilities in the community. The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) has provided standards in the past for how to place parks by park type, and the general facilities you might see in each park. The NRPA is moving away from the minimum standards of service, as findings indicate that each City has unique needs, and is encouraging communities to benchmark their metrics and enter their data into the national database. Therefore, if more parkland than the minimum standards is required to serve the population in each neighborhood, the City may acquire land to meet this need. local trEnds In April 2017 the City surveyed residents regarding, “What amenities are important to you as a resident?” Key findings from 115 responses were used to guide the 2040 Parks and Trails plan, including the following: • Parks and trails within a mile of each Corcoran neighborhood was valued by 51 percent. • Green spaces (i.e. open space parks) were valued by 61 percent of respondents. The 2017 survey supports a trend in past community surveys (in 2008 and 2004) also indicating that the City should develop trails, parks, and green spaces for park system patrons. FuturE ProjEctions By tyPE According to NRPA standards, there should be 1 neighborhood park per 5,000 people within 1/4 to 1/2 mile of their home and 1 community park per 15,000 people within 2 miles of a residential neighborhood. As Corcoran is still developing, it is important to consider the proximity of new parks to new residential developments, and how the density of the development affects the size and quantity of park types. Applying only 1 standard of park need (for example overall population) would suggest Corcoran needs just 1 community park. However, considering just the land area of Corcoran within the 2040 MUSA suggests the community would need nearly 10 community parks. While the overall acreage of parkland planned for Corcoran exceeds the standards set by the NRPA, not all neighborhoods have neighborhood or community parks within the recommended service areas. As population increases in each neighborhood, the City should acquire parkland in those neighborhoods to serve populations within each neighborhood. Based on review of park development trends as indicated by NRPA, the City will have a projected need of 14 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. With this standard in mind, and considering the character and existing ecological assets within Corcoran, the following is the planned system to serve approximately 11,300 people in 2040: Neighborhood Parks: The City has one neighborhood park, Wildflower Park in the Ravinia neighborhood. By 2040, the City will need approximately 2-3 additional neighborhood parks, totaling approximately 10-60 acres. Neighborhood parks should be located within ½ mile walking distance of significant neighborhood developments. • A new Town Square is planned in the downtown core, as part of the Corcoran Southeast District and Downtown Guidelines. The Town Square is categorized as a neighborhood park due to its scale and value to future downtown residents via programming. The Town Square is planned as a social center for the community, suitable for concerts and celebrations. It will be a public space to support the recreation in downtown. Community Parks: In addition to the 2 existing community parks, the City will need 1 to 2 new community parks by 2040. These additional community parks would require approximately 20-200 new acres. • Community Playfields: With the additional 60-acre parcel purchase from the Rockford School District, the City does not have an immediate need for additional playfields by 2040. The City will continue to work with landowners to identify opportunities to acquire additional land for future community playfields. A 2006 TKDA Needs Analysis and Recommendations offers metro-area guidelines for population-driven facility types and this study will serve as a continuing resource in the search for and design of both an athletic complex and the other identified parks. • Open Space Parks: The City will consider adding approximately 60 acres of public open space. The space may be divided among 3 sites. Local Linear Parks, Trails, Corridors and Parkways: See recommendations in Future Trails section that follows. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers % Trailhead MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake CookLake 456710 456750 456719 456730 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Oakdale Dr Br id l e Path Je f f rey Ln Abilene Ln Tr a i l L n HuntersRdg County Road 30 Heather Ln Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n H o r s e s h o e Bend Dr Cou nt y Ro a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 ESt Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Su nd a nc e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r El mSt Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d County Road 11 7 Stieg R d Be c h t o l d R d Ka l k R d Schutte Rd Meister Rd F ox Valley Dr M y s t iq u e Dr Hage Dr 93rd Ave N Schutte P l Br a nd y w ine Rd ChisholmT r l Tessmer Rd HighBluffLn WinchesterTrl JubertLn R u s h Creek RushCreek CountyDitch N u m b e r Sixte e n Cou n t y Ditch N u mberThree SouthFork Rus h C r eek NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxdDate: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP 75 The projected 2040 parkland area need, based on the 2040 population forcast for Corcoran is 158 acres, with the total planned system range for projected parkland area 159 to 209 acres.The existing acreage of parks in Corcoran are on the low end of NRPA standards for neighborhood and community parks. The high end of the range is due to Corcoran’s abundance of naturally occurring ecological assets. These assets are in most cases prohibited from development by environmental protection regulations. These ecological assets also support the unique character of Corcoran, a priority the community has identified as important to preserve (Policy 4, Goal 1). The community has also consistently conveyed the importance of maintaining the community’s rural character. Open space is a key feature in rural character. Recreation trends and community preferences will ultimately affect the number, size, and location of specific parks and facilities. The system master plan shows a concentration of new neighborhood parks within future neighborhoods where a density of new housing will support the need and use of those parks. The City will continue to work closely with the local school districts in future planning of playfields, athletic complexes, and additional park facilities. future trails Corcoran residents have expressed a strong interest in trails, particularly for walking and biking. The community also has a high level of interest in snowmobile and horseback trails. The community’s value of trails has been implemented into this plan. New to the 2040 Metropolitan Council Transportation Policy Plan, a Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) has been established. The RBTN seeks to integrate a seamless network of on road bikeways and off road trails to improve conditions for bicycle transportation at the regional level. Corcoran’s Trail System plan will consider connections to surrounding communities when planning on road bikeways and off road trails to support park system patrons interest in trails and the regional bicycle transportation network. taBle 5-2: City and County trail system Within CorCoran Total Trail Miles in 2040 MUSA 58 All Types Total Trail Miles Outside 2040 MUSA 56 Total Off Road Miles 50 Inside & Outside MUSA Total On Road Miles 64 Total Trail System Miles 114 There are several categories of trails identified on the 2040 Parks and Trails Plan. The City of Corcoran is continuing to plan for a fully developed system ultimately offering up to 114 miles of trails. Trail categories and potential trail options are described in Figures 5-8 through 5-11: taBle 5-1: ProjeCted aCres of Park land Park Name / Type Existing Area (acres) New Proposed Area (acres) Neighborhood Parks 5.13 10-60 Wildflower Park 5.13 0 Town Center 0 4-5 Community Parks 84 60 City Hall Park/Memorial Garden 8 0 Community Playfields 76 0 Open Space Parks 0 60 Subtotal 89.13 70-120 Total Planned System 159-209 Total Projected Need by 2040 158 acres Figure 5-10: Sidwalk with Boulevard off Roadway Figure 5-11: On Road Trail on Roadway with Boulevard Figure 5-8: Off-Road Trail with 20’ Easement Figure 5-9: Off-Road Trail with Boulevard off Roadway 76 regional linking trail Regional linking trails are located to serve as linkages between components of the regional parks system. When feasible, linking trails should attempt to connect the population, economic, and social centers along its route. Corcoran has 1 existing regional linking trail, the Lake Independence Regional Trail, located along County Road 19 that stretches from Baker Park Reserve to Crow-Hassan Park Reserve. The general alignment is shown on the map along County Road 19. The length of this trail through Corcoran is approximately 6 miles. This trail is considered a Tier 2 alignment in the RBTN network. A proposed regional trail (Rush Creek Regional Trail) is also planned just outside the northern edge of Corcoran providing a connection point from County Road 101 near 117 to Crow-Hassan Park Reserve. A second RBTN, Tier 2 trail is proposed for County Road 101 between Corcoran and Maple Grove. No other RBTN network connections are proposed in the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 TPP. regional trail searCh Corridor addition Regional trail search corridors (RTSC) are proposed regional trails without a Metropolitan Council-approved master plan that identifies trail alignment. Because they do not have a Council-approved master plan, these corridors are not eligible for Regional Parks System funding for acquisition and development. Within Corcoran, a RTSC proposed by the Three River Park District was recommended as a system addition to the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan. This RTSC’s general alignment along County Road 116 is shown in Figure 5-13 as North-South 1. Figure 5-14 shows a refined version of the same RTSC identified as the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. This trail would connect several different existing and proposed regional trails and is the only RTSC in Corcoran. County trail County trails, in this case proposed and managed by either Hennepin County as part of their regional bikeway system or Three Rivers Park District (TRPD) as part of their regional trail system, are often found adjacent to major roadways and locations needed to link cities and components of the local or regional recreation system and/or community facilities such as schools, libraries or commercial destinations. Three Rivers Park System has proposed a network of nearly 49 miles off road trails for Corcoran, generally aligning with Greenway Corridors. It should be noted that trail terminology varies from County to City. In this plan and in the City of Corcoran generally, terms of on road and off road trails are preferred. Hennepin County uses on street and off street terminology though they are functionally the same. on road trail This trail type is a striped or signed bikeway on an existing road right-of-way or designated lane. The City has 1 4.5-mile on road trail along County Road 30 and 1 6-mile trail along County Road 116. By 2040, the City on road trail system is planned to include 31 miles; another 33 miles of on road trails are planned outside the MUSA. off road trail An off road-trail is a multi-use trail, paved or gravel that is at least 8 feet wide. These trails are designed for bicycle, pedestrian, and other non- motorized uses. The City and County agencies combined are planning for approximately 49 miles of off road trails, 26 miles inside the 2040 MUSA and 23 miles outside that area. The City is investigating the possibility of co-locating an off-road trail over the natural gas pipeline easement in the southern half of the City. Dayton Greenfield Hanover Independence Loretto PlymouthMedina Corcoran Maple Grove Rogers 94 55 HanoverSaint Michael Rockford Twp. Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) 0 1 2 3 40.5 Miles City of Corcoran, Hennepin County Regional Trails (Parks Policy Plan) Existing Planned County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries NCompass Street Centerlines Open Water Features Existing State Trails (DNR) Mississippi River Trail RBTN Alignments Tier 1 Alignment Tier 2 Alignment RBTN Corridors (Alignments Undefined) Tier 2 Corridor Tier 1 Priority Corridor Regional Destinations Metropolitan Job Centers Regional Job Centers Subregional Job Centers Large High Schools Colleges & Universities Highly Visited Regional Parks Major Sport & Entertainment Centers Figure 5-12: Regional Bicycle Transportation Network Figure 5-16: Conceptual Regional Trail System Figure 5-15: Conceptual Bike Trail System Dayton Greenfield Hanover Independence PlymouthMedina Corcoran Maple Grove Rogers No r t h - S o u t h 1 North - South 1 La k e I n d e p e n d e n c e La k e I n d e p e n d e n c e Crow River RushCreek Hanover Crow Hassan Regional Parks System 0 1 2 3 4 50.5 Miles City of Corcoran, Hennepin County Regional Parks Existing In Master Plan Planned Parks and Reserves Regional Trails Existing Regional Trails Planned Regional Trails Regional Trail Corridor Land Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge State Parks State Wildlife Management Areas (Publicly Accessible) Scientific and Natural Areas (SNA) Other Parks and Preserves Existing State Trails Street Centerlines (NCompass) Lakes and Major Rivers Regional Park Search Areas and Regional Trail Search Corridors Boundary Adjustments Search Areas Regional Trails - 2040 System Additions Regional Trail Search Corridors Figure 5-13: Regional Trail Search Area Figure 5-14: Diamond Lake RT Map 77 78 79 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers % Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Oakdale Dr B r i d l e Pa t h J e f f r e y L n Abilene Ln Tr a i l L n Hunters Rdg County Road 30 He a t h e r Ln Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n H o r s e s h o e Bend D r Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 ES t Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r El mSt Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old Se t t le rs R d County R oad 1 1 7 Stie g R d Be c h t o l d R d Ka l k R d Schutte Rd Meister Rd F o x V a l l e y Dr M y s t i q u e Dr H a g e Dr 93rd Ave N Sc hut t e P l Br a n d y w i n e Rd Chisholm T r l Tessmer Rd HighBlu ffLn Winc hest erTrl JubertLn R u s h C re e k RushCreek County Ditc h N u m b e r S i x t e e n Co u n t y Ditch N u mber Three SouthFor k R u s h C r e e k NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019Time: 1:22:31 PMUser: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP 80 81 CHAPTER 6: TRANSPORTATION goals anD PoliCies 83 suPPorT anD raTionale 83 2018 exisTingTransPorTaTion sysTeM 83 highways anD sTreeTs 83 aCCess ManageMenT guiDelines 85 TraffiC voluMes 86 TransPorTaTion issues 87 highway 55 CorriDor 87 CounTy roaD 10 anD CounTy roaD 50 87 realignMenT CounTy roaD 30 87 inTerChange aT i-94/BroCkTon lane 87 river Crossings 87 TransiT sysTeM 88 freighT 88 aviaTion faCiliTies 88 BiCyCling anD walking 88 2040 fuTure TransPorTaTion sysTeM 88 highways anD sTreeTs 88 roaDway CaPaCiTy analysis 89 figures 6-1 funCTional ClassifiCaTion relaTionshiP 84 6-2 hierarChy of MoveMenT 84 TaBles 6-1 foreCasT By PoPulaTion, householD anD eMPloyMenT 86 6-2 level of serviCe DesCriPTion 86 6-3 generalizeD Planning average Daily 86 TraffiCe voluMe ThresholD 6-5 2040 Planning los 89 6-6 hennePin CounTy -- Base 2040 roaDway 89 neTwork iMProveMenTs 6-7 hennePin CounTy -- oPTional 2030 89 roaDway neTwork iMrroveMenTs MaPs 6-1exisTing roaDway JurisDiCTion 91 6-2 exisTing roaDway funCTional ClassifiCaTion 93 6-3 TraffiC analysis zones 95 6-4 exisTing annual average Daily TraffiC 97 voluMes (aaDT) 6-5 TransPorTaTion issue areas 99 6-6 2040 average Daily TraffiC voluMes (aaDT) 101 6-7 2040 roaDway funCTional ClassifiCaTion 103 82 83 The purpose of the transportation plan is to identify existing and future transportation needs in the City of Corcoran for the horizon year of 2040. The plan also identifies policies and planned actions to meet those transportation needs. The transportation chapter identifies the City of Corcoran goals and policies and describes the existing and future transportation system. The impact on transportation systems and the responsibility for improvements to the system are a State, County, and City issue. While the City of Corcoran must provide the resources to accommodate transportation demands that coincide with its land use decisions and population growth, increased traffic from the growth of neighboring communities are also part of the traffic demand. The County and State share the responsibility of providing safe and efficient transportation through the City of Corcoran. Corcoran is designated partially as an Emerging Suburban Edge community in the Metropolitan Council’s Thrive MSP 2040 plan. The planning area sets overall densities that the planned development patterns in the community can be expected to achieve. There are many land use decisions that are tied to roadway improvements. Some land uses are not appropriate without adequate transportation facilities. The issue of what occurs first, development or the systems to support it, will be critical as it relates to transportation needs. Coordination of the infrastructure will be necessary to create a system that works to support the land uses both in and surrounding Corcoran. As the City develops, focus should be on protecting natural resources, ensuring sufficient public infrastructure, and developing transition strategies to increase density and encourage infill development. goals and PoliCies Goal 1: Improve the transportation network for local and pass-through traffic. Policy 1: Provide a comprehensive transportation system based upon functional classification of roadways that fully promotes connectivity and is coordinated with neighboring cities and counties. Policy 2: Identify a transportation system that efficiently moves traffic, minimizes traffic conflicts as development occurs, and is consistent with MnDOT, Hennepin County, neighboring communities, and the City’s land use plan. Policy 3: Identify long-term planning for transportation corridors to manage access and capital improvements as development occurs. Policy 4: Study the alignments of County Road 10 and County Road 50 represented on the Transportation Plan to improve the geometric configuration and align with the long-range City land-use plan. Policy 5: Fund a Capital Improvements Program to ensure long-term street maintenance and reconstruction programs. Policy 6: Plan and design transportation facilities that preserve natural resources and existing infrastructure where applicable. Policy 7: Pave appropriate public gravel roads deemed necessary by the City as circumstances such as development, regional improvements, City needs, or other dictate, subject to financial feasibility and funding availability. Goal 2: Ensure that planned transportation infrastructure, capacity, and access will accommodate proposed land uses and development. Policy 1: Incorporate the use of innovative traffic management options and technologies. Coordinate transportation planning and system improvements with other government jurisdictions. Policy 2: Comprehensively coordinate all transportation-related facilities as 1 system. Policy 3: Incorporate land uses and access spacing guidelines compatible with the functional classification of the regional highway system. Policy 4: Develop all additional elements of the street system (sidewalks, trails, lighting, landscaping, etc.) harmoniously with adjacent land uses and transportation objectives. Goal 3: Incorporate elements in development standards related to bicycle and pedestrian uses. Policy 1: In all residential and mixed-use areas, identify future pedestrian, trail, and bicycle facilities to connect neighborhoods with major commercial and park and recreational areas. Policy 2: Design arterial highways in the City to prevent unregulated pedestrian and bicycle crossings and to protect pedestrian and bicycle movement paralleling vehicular traffic. Additional information regarding the trail system in Corcoran is provided in Chapter 5. suPPort and rationalE For transPortation goals and PoliciEs The concern over regional traffic on the City’s road system can be managed internally to an extent. By providing a local street system that relies on internal connections between neighborhoods, local conflicts with regional traffic can be avoided in many instances. Where multiple trip options exist, traffic impacts on any 1 location are minimized. However, when traffic is concentrated to only a few practical routes, traffic conflicts affect everyone. Subdivision design will be required to include internal connections wherever possible. The City expects that new development will be designed with sufficient traffic planning improvements and those impacts on the system will be kept to those routes that are properly intended for increased traffic levels. These goals and policies also carry an expectation that the City will work actively with its neighboring communities and other highway jurisdictions to improve traffic management on all routes through the City. At the same time, Corcoran expects that transportation planning respects the City’s other planning goals and designs roadways that enhance the environment of the community. This may mean innovative design techniques or routing of traffic to preserve sensitive areas. The City will work with all jurisdictions to ensure the accomplishment of both traffic needs and the City’s land use goals. On a community-wide basis, pedestrian movement is likely to be more recreational in nature. The predominant rural development pattern does not lend itself to reliance on walking or bicycling for daily commerce. However, the development of trail systems is a popular recreational attraction. The retrofitting of existing development areas and the design of new development areas (both urban and rural) with trail systems, bike ways, and sidewalks will be an important improvement for the community. With the higher level of development activity envisioned by this Plan, roadway design and access will play a more important role in locating new development. The urban districts delineated in the land use plan are to be served by major collector or arterial roadways. New urban development within those districts will need to demonstrate more than the mere availability of utility services, or avoidance of natural resource areas. The potential for loading significant amounts of new traffic onto the City’s street and highway system will require attention to the capacity of the higher function roadways serving the project area. In some areas, construction of new collector streets may be required as a pre-condition for approval of a new subdivision where it is not possible to mitigate downstream traffic impacts. Access management is a key to controlling the impacts of new traffic generation and avoidance of congestion. Moreover, direct access to major streets (regardless of jurisdiction) has significant land use impacts in the creation of conflicts, increasing crash statistics, and decreasing land values. Corcoran will actively implement access management policies throughout the City and will require all subdivision design to comply with the highest thresholds of transportation planning. 2018 existing transPortation system Transportation elements are divided into several sub-categories, each of which is an important piece of the overall transportation system. Several sub-categories are further divided into existing and 2040 conditions. highWays and strEEts roadWay jurisdiCtion Roadways are categorized under the agency that is responsible for their maintenance. The State is responsible for the Federal Interstate, US Highways, Minnesota Trunk Highways (TH), and State Park Roads. The County is responsible for County State-Aid Highways (County Road) and County Roads (CR). Other roadways, including Municipal State-Aid Streets and municipal roads are the responsibility of the City of Corcoran. Map 6-1 shows the current jurisdiction for the area roadways. Map 6-1: Existing Roadway Juristiction (See page 91 for large size map.) TRANSPORTATION Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Coun ty R oa d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wil l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C re e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek Sout h Fork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing Roadway Jurisdiction.mxdDate: 1/7/2019Time: 3:42:48 PMUser: ShuJC0243 State HighwayCounty State Aid Highway (CSAH)County RoadMunicipal State Aid Street (MSAS)Municipal StreetMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-1Existing Roadway Jurisdiction Source:Existing Roadway Jurisdiction (MN DOT) 84 roadWay funCtional ClassifiCation The functional classification of roadways provides guidelines for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods within the City. Roads are categorized based upon the level of access and mobility provided. Functional classification of a roadway system involves determining what function each roadway should be performing with regard to travel within and through the City. The intent of a functional classification system is the creation of a roadway hierarchy that collects and distributes traffic from local roadways and collectors to arterials in a safe and efficient manner. Such classification aids in determining: • Appropriate roadway widths • Speed limits • Intersection control • Design features • Accessibility • Maintenance priorities Functional classification helps to ensure that non-transportation factors, such as land use and development, are considered in planning and design of the roadway system. A balanced system is desired, yet not always attainable due to existing conditions and characteristics. The criteria of the functional classification system are intended to be guidelines and are to be applied when plans are developed for the construction or reconstruction of a given classified route. It can, and does, occur that different roadways with very similar design characteristics may have different functional classifications. Some roadways, for a short segment, may carry higher volumes than a roadway with a higher classification. Spacing guidelines may not follow recommendations for a variety of reasons such as topography, environmental concerns, and land use type and density. The 2 major considerations in the classification of roadway networks are access and mobility. Mobility is of primary importance on arterials, thus the limitation of access is a necessity. The primary function of a local roadway, however, is the provision of access, which in turn limits mobility. The extent and degree of access control is a very important factor in the function of a roadway facility. The functional classification types utilized are dependent upon 1 another in order to provide a complete system of streets and highways. The relationship of functional classification regarding traffic mobility and land access is shown below in Figure 6-1. A complete functional design system provides a series of distinct travel movements. Most trips exhibit 6 recognizable stages. These stages are as follows. • Main movement • Transition • Distribution • Collection • Access • Termination As an example, Figure 6-2 depicts the hierarchy of movement by illustrating a hypothetical trip using a freeway, which comprises the main movement. When the vehicle leaves the freeway, the transition is the use of the freeway ramp at a reduced speed. The vehicle then enters the moderate speed arterial, the distribution function, to travel toward a neighborhood. From the arterial, the vehicle enters a collection road then a local access road that provides direct approach to the residence or termination point. Each of the 6 stages of the trip is handled by a facility designed specifically for that function. Speeds and volumes normally decrease as 1 travels through the 6 stages of movement. It must be recognized that not all intermediate facilities are needed for various trip types. The character of movement or service that is provided has a function and these functions do not act independently. PrinCiPal arterials Principal arterials carry a higher proportion of total urbanized travel on a minimum of mileage. They also serve major activity centers, higher traffic volumes, and longer trips. Along these facilities, access needs to be limited in order to preserve the ability of the roadway to accommodate the volumes and to maximize safety. Principal arterials emphasize mobility over land access. Little or no direct land access should be allowed within an urban area. Grade separated intersections are required for freeways and are highly desired for other principal arterial roadways. In the Metro area, interstate freeways are classified as principal arterials. Highway 55 is a principal arterial within the City of Corcoran. minor arterials Minor arterial roadways connect the urban service area to cities and towns inside and outside the region and generally service medium to short trips. Minor arterials connect principal arterials, minor arterials, and collectors. The spacing ranges from 1/4 to 3/4 of a mile in metro centers to 1 to 2 miles in a developing area. The desired minimum average speed during peak traffic periods is 20 mph in fully developed areas and 30 mph in developing areas. The emphasis for minor arterial roadways is on mobility rather than land access. In urban areas, direct land access is generally restricted to concentrations of commercial/industrial land uses. Minor arterials generally serve medium to short trips and provide use for local and limited stop transit service. Figure 6-1: Existing Roadway Jurisdiction Figure 6-2: Existing Roadway Functional Classification 85 Minor arterials are divided into “A” minor arterials and “B” minor arterials. “A” minor arterials are roadways that are of regional importance because they relieve, expand, or complement the principal arterial system. “A” minor arterials are categorized into 4 types, consistent with Metropolitan Council guidelines: Relievers Minor arterials that provide direct relief for metropolitan highway traffic. There are currently no “A” minor arterial relievers within the City. Expanders Routes that provide a way to make connections between urban areas outside the I-494/I-694 beltway. County Road 101 is an example of an “A” minor arterial expander within Corcoran. Connectors Roads that provide connections to and among communities at the edge of the urbanized area and in rural areas. County Road 50, County Road 30, and County Road 19 are examples of an “A” minor arterial connector in Corcoran. Augmenters Roadways that augment principal arterials within the I-494/I-694 beltway. There are currently no augmenters within Corcoran. A well-planned and adequately designed system of a principal and “A” minor arterials will allow the City’s overall street system to function the way it is intended and will discourage through traffic from using residential streets. Volumes on principal and minor arterials roadways are expected to be higher than on collector or local roadways. “B” minor arterials provide a city-wide function, serving medium to long distance trips. There are currently 2 “B” minor arterials within the City, County Road 116, and County Road 117 (109th Avenue North). ColleCtor streets Collector streets provide more land access than arterials and provide connections to arterials, although not in all cases. As is the case with any roadway system, there will always be exceptions to the planning guidelines that are used to classify a roadway system. Collectors serve a dual function of accommodating traffic and the provision of more access to adjacent properties. Mobility and land access are equally important and direct land access should predominately be to development concentrations. Collector road spacing ranges from 1/4 to 3/4 of a mile in a fully developed area, and 1/2 to 1 mile in a developing area. Collectors can be broken down further into major and minor collectors. Major collectors generally connect to minor arterials and serve shorter trips within the County or City. These roads supplement the arterial system in that mobility is slightly emphasized over access. An example of a major collector within Corcoran is County Road 10. Minor collectors provide the connection between neighborhoods and commercial/industrial areas and the major collector/minor arterial system. Access is slightly emphasized over mobility in minor collectors. Oakdale Drive, Trail Haven Road, Kalk Road, and Willow Drive are examples of minor collectors within the City. Some of these are gravel roads, and the challenge of paving is discussed in the next section. loCal streets The lowest classification of roadways is the local roadway where access is provided with much less concern for control, but land service is paramount. Spacing for local streets is as needed to access land uses. Local roadways generally have lower speed limits in urban areas and normally serve short trips. Local streets will connect with some minor arterials but generally connect to collectors and other local streets. The development of local streets will be guided by the location of the existing and proposed minor arterials and collectors as well as by development and the expansion of local utilities. Abilene Lane, Foxline Drive, Horseshoe Bend Drive, Jackie Lane, and Sundance Road are examples of local streets. The existing roadway functional classification system is shown on Map 6-2. Map 6-2: Existing Roadway Functional Classification (See page 93 for large size map.) Corcoran has 36 miles of gravel roads, most of which are local streets and collector roads. The City continuously faces a challenge of when or if to reconstruct the gravel roads with pavement. A guideline used by Minnesota State Aid for paving gravel roads is an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) of greater than 300, which occurs presently on various segments on the collectors of Trail Haven, Willow Larkin, etc. Given that the cost to pave all the gravel roads is estimated to be upwards of $50M in today’s dollars, it is not viable for the current tax base. Therefore, it will be an ongoing issue to prioritize the improvements based on traffic counts, financial feasibility, and political and resident support. accEss ManagEMEnt guidElinEs The management of thoroughfare access along roadway systems, particularly arterial and collector roadways is a very important component of maximizing the capacity and decreasing the crash potential along those roadway facilities. As mentioned in a previous section, arterial roadways have a function of accommodating larger volumes of traffic and often at higher speeds. Therefore, access to such facilities must be limited in order to protect the integrity of the arterial function. Collector roadways provide a link from local streets to arterial roadways and are designed to provide more access to local land uses since the volumes and speeds are often less than arterial roadways. Studies have shown that as the density of access increases, whether public or private, the traffic-carrying capacity of the roadway decreases and the vehicular crash rate increases. Businesses suffer financially on roadways with poorly designed access, while well-designed access to commercial properties support long-term economic vitality. As with many transportation related decisions, land use activity and planning are an integral part of the creation of a safe and efficient roadway system. Every land use plan amendment, subdivision, rezoning, conditional use permit, or site plan involves access and creates a potential impact to the efficiency of the transportation system. Properties have access rights and good design will minimize the deleterious effect upon the roadway system. Minnesota State Statutes requires that “reasonable, convenient, and suitable” access to property shall be provided. Access management is a combination of good land use planning and effective design of access to property. The granting of access is shared by the State, County, and City with each having the permitting process responsibility over roadways under their control. The aforementioned authorities may also require the following while examining access: • Dedication of public rights-of-way • Construction of public roadways, trails, and bikeways • Mitigation measures of traffic and/or other impacts • Change in and/or development of new access points • Dedication of trail easements Using proper access guidelines helps all the agencies involved act in a coordinated manner. However, access spacing is important not just for new developments, but for existing developments and accesses as well. Processes should be developed to deal with existing corridors that have allowed improper access spacing in the past. In these cases, it is possible that the number of access points exceed the access spacing guidelines. These existing access points must be handled in a different manner than with new access points. It is desired to aggressively minimize any new accesses while consolidating, restricting, and/or reducing existing access points as redevelopment occurs. It is important to remember that access spacing guidelines are long term goals and not absolute rules. Maintaining flexibility is important when promoting access consolidation, including consideration of existing conditions, physical barriers, or constraints. The traveling public benefits from access spacing whether using grade-separated crossings, frontage roads, right-turn only entrances/ exits, etc. Given the number of agencies potentially involved in reviewing plats and access points, access guideline and corridor management practices should be implemented at the State, County, and City level. MnDOT has developed guidelines for access management based upon their goals of safety, mobility, and statewide growth. As a part of their guidelines, 4 new categories were developed as an addition to the functional classification system: • High Priority Interregional Corridors (IRC) • Medium Priority IRC • Regional Corridors • Statewide Roads These types of roadways link the State’s primary trade centers and the Twin Cities Metro area to one another. MnDOT has further divided the primary categories into sub- categories based upon the specific facilities and land use patterns surrounding the roadway. Highway 55 is recognized as a regional corridor. The governmental unit controlling specific roadways also controls access to these roadways. For the most up-to-date access spacing guidelines, contact MnDOT and Hennepin County. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl County R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek South Fork RushCreek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing Roadway Funtional Classification.mxdDate: 1/8/2019Time: 6:37:13 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Principal ArterialA Minor ExpanderA Minor ConnectorOther ArterialMajor CollectorMinor CollectorMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-2Existing Roadway Functional Classification Source:Existing Roadway Functional Classifictaion (Metropolitan Council) 86 traFFic voluMEs The Metropolitan Council has projected the City’s growth as shown in Table 6-1. The growth will be accommodated through development efforts. Map 6-3 shows the location of each traffic assignment zone (TAZ) within the City limits. The Metropolitan Council’s Transportation Policy Plan supports the maintenance and enhancement of transportation facilities to accommodate growth and reinvestment into the community. taBle 6-1: foreCast of PoPulation, households, and emPloyment By taZ Population Households Employment TAZ 2020 2030 2040 2020 2030 2040 2020 2030 2040 778 49 52 48 19 21 20 51 53 52 779 108 113 105 41 45 43 27 28 27 780 324 342 317 123 138 131 30 31 30 781 282 295 273 107 119 113 201 212 207 782 520 974 1583 197 393 654 34 39 41 783 216 304 380 82 122 156 38 41 41 784 1249 1897 2559 475 764 1055 153 227 322 785 277 255 268 102 101 113 114 213 362 786 569 528 522 209 211 221 178 198 193 787 830 767 747 305 306 315 53 56 54 898 479 860 1354 177 344 566 75 83 88 899 992 1536 2123 367 614 887 548 588 598 900 739 922 966 273 369 403 169 193 213 901 110 116 108 41 46 45 30 48 72 Map 6-3: Traffic Analysis Zones (See page 95 for large size map.) The most recent daily traffic volume information for the primary roadways in the City of Corcoran was obtained from MnDOT. Map 6-4 shows the existing average annual daily traffic (AADT) and heavy commercial average annual daily traffic (HCAADT) volumes within the City. There are no railroad facilities, barge facilities, or intermodal freight terminals in Corcoran. Most truck traffic in the City is either passing through or delivering goods to local busiensses. The traffic volumes shown in Map 6-4 are used as a planning tool to help test the ability of a roadway to accommodate future volumes. In addition to the number of lanes provided, the daily capacity of any individual roadway is based upon many factors including: • Number of access points per mile • Number of signalized intersections per mile • Percentage of truck traffic • Physical grade of the roadways Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of service measures such as: • Speed and travel time • Freedom to maneuver • Traffic interruption • Comfort and convenience Map 6-4: Existing Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes (ADT) (See page 97 for large size map.) Six levels, LOS A to LOS F, are generally used for traffic analysis. LOS A is the best with free flow conditions and little to no delay. LOS F is the worst with congestion, long delays, and forced flow. Table 6-2 shows how each level of service would look to motorists. For planning purposes, a generalized average daily traffic (ADT) threshold for roadways is used. Table 6-3 shows the generalized ADT volume thresholds for a roadway type and number of lanes in terms of level of service. taBle 6-3: generaliZed Planning average daily traffiC volume thresholds Facility Type Maximum ADT Volume at Level of Service1 A B C D2 E 2-Lane Roadway Without Turn Lanes 3,000 4,500 6,500 8,500 10,000 With R Turn Lanes 4,750 7,200 10,300 13,500 15,900 With L Turn Lanes3 5,250 7,900 11,400 14,900 17,500 With L and R Turn Lanes3 7,500 11,250 16,250 21,250 25,000 4-Lane Roadway Without Turn Lanes 7,100 10,700 15,400 20,100 23,700 With R Turn Lanes 9,600 14,400 20,700 27,100 31,900 With L Turn Lanes4 10,100 15,200 21,900 28,600 33,700 With L and R Turn Lanes4 12,600 18,900 27,200 35,600 41,900 1ADT Volumes above the LOS E maximum threshold would be considered LOS F. 2LOS D is usually the lowest acceptable LOS allowed by most agencies within the metro area. 3Also considered the planning capacity for a 3-lane roadway (1 through lane in each direction with a center, 2-way left turn lane) without or with a right turn lane. 4Also considered the planning capacity for a 5-lane roadway (2 through lanes in each direction with a center, 2-way left turn lane) without or with a right turn lane. Note: Approximate values based upon several assumptions: Capacity assumptions per lane, Peak hour percentages, Directional orientation, ¼ mile signal spacing. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Cou nty R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wil l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C re e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek South F orkRushCreek RushCreek 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785786 787 788789 790 871 872 875 897 898 899 900901 902 909 911 913 914 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Traffic Analysis Zones.mxdDate: 1/8/2019 Time: 6:39:27 AM User: ShuJC0243 Traffic Analysis ZonesMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-3Traffic Analysis Zones Source:Traffic Analysis Zones (Metropolitan Council) Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake 15,600 6, 6 0 0 6, 3 0 0 5, 9 0 0 8, 9 0 0 9, 3 0 0 7, 3 0 0 7, 3 0 0 6,200 9, 6 0 0 9, 6 0 0 6, 6 0 0 1,450 2,200 2,8003,050 3,050 2,400 5,900 2,30 0 8,600 10,700 6, 6 0 0 6, 3 0 0 5, 2 0 0 2, 7 0 0 6, 4 0 0 4, 5 5 0 2,150 2,400 1,600 1,100 1,200 175 285 290 57 0 225 480 8301,050 21 5 25 0 16 0 23 5 45 5 39 5 37 0 51 0 3,150 99 0 690 1, 4 0 0 1,500 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Du ffney Dr D St 81stPlN V a lle y V ie w Rd Hackamore Rd Oakdale Dr Br i d l e Path J e f f re y Ln G St Abilene Ln Ma p l e Ln HillsideDr HuntersRdg Steeple Chase L n County Road 30 Br o c k t o n L n N 75th Ave N Heat her Ln Sc hutte FarmRd Pion e e r T r l Hidden Ponds Dr Tr a i l H a v e n R d 109th Ave N County Roa d 1 0 C h e r r y Ln Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n ParkTrail Rd H o r s e s h o e BendDr RushC r e e k Blvd Rush Creek Dr Co un t y Ro a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Wil l o w D r C S t Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 JulieAnnDr J ac kie Ln Corco ranTrl W Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Corcoran Trl E Ca i n R d T r a il L n Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Eb e r t Rd S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Wagon Wheel Ln Larkin Rd PatrickPl 70thAveN E a gle Rid g e Rd Lily PondLn Darrell Ln Fo x l i n e D r Ga r d e n Ln Oswald FarmRd Strehler Rd Cain Pl Sn y d e r Rd 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Ka l k Road Ext County Ro a d 1 1 7 Tri den RidgeCir Stieg R d Be c h t o l d R d W i nd mi ll D r Ka l k R d Schutte Rd RushMeadowL nCo un t ry Hills Dr Meister Rd F o x Valley Dr M y s t iqu e Dr Hage Dr 93rd Ave N Schutte P l SunnyHill Ln Bra nd yw ine Rd Ch isholm T rl Tessmer Rd Crow Hassan Park Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r M e a d o w CreekDr HighBluffLn Winchester Trl JubertLn R u s h C reek RushCreek SouthFork Ru s h C r eek South F o rkRushCreek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing ADT.mxdDate: 1/8/2019Time: 6:55:00 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-4Existing Annual AverageDaily Traffic Volumes (AADT) andHeavy Commercial AnnualAverage Daily Traffic (HCAADT) Source:Existing Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes(MN DOT, Hennepin County)Existing Heavy Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic Volume(MN DOT, Hennepin County) 2015 Trunk Highway AADT Volumes 2015 County Road AADT Volumes 2014 Local Street AADT Volumes 1,230 1,230 1,230 1,230 2017 HCAADT Volumes taBle 6-2: level of serviCe desCriPtion 87 transPortation issues This section identifies transportation issues that affect the City’s transportation plan. The section was compiled from several sources including: • Highway 55 Corridor Coalition • Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP) • Comprehensive Plans from surrounding communities • Corcoran’s Vision Some of the issues have been identified on Map 6-5. The City of Corcoran may or may not support all the issues that are discussed in the following section, but the issues have been discussed by others and may affect Corcoran. Map 6-5: Trasportation Issue Areas (See page 99 for large size map.) highWay 55 corridor Highway 55 is a primary transportation corridor linking the western communities in Wright County and Hennepin County to the Minneapolis/ St. Paul Metropolitan area. The corridor has become congested as the area has developed because there are no parallel routes to spread the traffic demand. Therefore, the capacity of Highway 55 must be increased. The increasing traffic and capacity needs are a growing concern to the communities along the corridor. Direct access to Highway 55 and crashes along the corridor have raised the concern for the safety of everyone who uses the highway. MnDOT is currently faced with growing transportation needs throughout the State and decreasing transportation funding. The Highway 55 Corridor Coalition has prepared a concept improvement plan for Highway 55. This plan proposes the provision of an improved facility with the potential of interchanges at County Road 101 and County Road 116. The plan proposes Highway 55 to be a 6-lane divided roadway from the City of Medina to County Road 116 in Corcoran and then a 4-lane divided highway from County Road 116 to County Road 19. The concepts developed within this corridor plan are a guide to help preserve future right- of-way along the corridor. Funding does not exist to construct any of the recommended improvements at this time. county road 10/county road 50 rEalignMEnt The existing intersection of County Road 10/County Road 50 has poor geometrics due to the angle the roads form as they intersect. The area also contains the City’s largest municipal park, a historical church facility, tight corridor and limited right-of-way. The City has a vision to develop this area as its downtown redevelopment. The County roadways would need to be realigned to improve geometrics and accommodate the City’s vision. This realignment would aim to by-pass the downtown area as well as create a standard right- angle intersection at County Road 10 and County Road 116. The exact location of the realigned roadway has been previously studied, and will again require study and planning as the County seeks to reduce congestion and conflict points. The area should be studied in detail as development plans progress. nW hEnnEPin county transPortation iMProvEMEnts The Northwest Hennepin County – I-94 Sub-Area Transportation Study (NW Hennepin Study) was completed in April 2008. The study was initiated to identify future transportation system needs, to address the changing needs within those communities, and to establish the groundwork for moving forward with requests for additional access to I-94. Through the study, some key issues were identified including a lack of an arterial roadway system in the area, physical constraints, congestion, and access to I-94. The study identifies an area south of I-94, which includes Corcoran, as an area that lacks an arterial roadway system. Traffic volume forecasts for the year 2040 were developed based on Metropolitan Council projections of population, households, and employment. The study area roadway’s capacities and deficiencies were identified so that communities can plan for additional capacity improvements or manage facilities effectively through access controls, right-of- way preservation, setback requirements, and/or land use and development controls. Improvements identified in the study were based on transportation system needs and growth trends with no account for available funding. Implementation priorities were established using the following criterion: • Improving system connectivity to provide better east-west and north-south flow in immediate growth areas; • Addressing current capacity issues at major intersections/ interchanges and overloaded segments; • Addressing I-94 access issues to better balance access to I-94; • Leveraging funding of federal, state, local, and private funds to the fullest extent. county road 30 The City plans for County Road 30 is to be the primary east-west corridor through Corcoran in the future. The extension of County Road 30 east of Corcoran will connect to the future Highway 610 interchange at I-94. Eventually, County Road 30 will be a 4-lane facility through Corcoran. The City plans for County Road 30 to be designed as a parkway through the City. Future development may need to provide larger right-of-way to accommodate a parkway design. intErchangE at i-94/Brockton lanE As the northwest Hennepin County area grows, increased access to I-94 is necessary to relieve current access points and to balance flows on the arterial roadway system. The NW Hennepin Study examined an interchange at the Brockton Lane area due to spacing from other I-94 access points as well as connections to the arterial roadway system. This proposed regional access to I-94 serves to relieve adjacent interchanges, increase system efficiency and safety, and relieve overloads on other local system linkages. If access to I-94 in the Brockton Lane area is not provided, significant capacity enhancements to arterials and interchanges at TH 101 in Rogers and County Road 30 in Maple Grove would be needed. rivEr crossings The potential need for a new Crow River crossing was raised by the Wright County Transportation Plan in 1994, but was seen as being beyond the study period in the Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP). This potential link would extend County Road 30 in Hennepin County westerly to Wright County Road 144, thus providing an east-west connection between Buffalo to TH 610. The impacts of this river crossing are still being examined. The exact alignment of the County Road 30 extension and the river crossing has not yet been determined and will require further detailed study. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Cou nty R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake CSAH 10/Larkin Rd/Maple Hill Rd Intersection CSAH 10 Realignment Proposed CR10 Realignment Potential CR10Turn Back Potential Functional Classification or Funding Designation Changes Potential Functional Classificationor Funding Designation Changes CASH 117 Extension - Rogers Potential I-94/Brockton Interchange CSAH 10/116 Intersection R u s h C re e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek South Fork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Trans Issues.mxdDate: 1/8/2019 Time: 6:49:54 AM User: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-5Transportation Issue Areas 88 transit system Transit Link dial-a-ride service is provided in Corcoran. There are currently no other public transit facilities or services provided in Corcoran. As growth and development occur in the community it will be important to include transit options in designs. Park and Ride or carpool areas should be accommodated in site development or on public sites. Streets or parking lots can be designed with pull over locations to accommodate bus stops that do not impede traffic flow. While the City does not have public transit at this time, other types of transit solutions should not be ignored and should be explored. Corcoran is currently designated as the Metropolitan Transit Market Area V. Transit Market Area V has very low population and employment densities and tends to be primarily rural communities and agricultural uses. General public dial-a-ride service may be appropriate here, but due to the very low- intensity land uses these areas are not well-suited for fixed-route transit service. Figure 6-3: Transit Market Area V Source: Metropolitan Council FrEight There are no railroad facilities, barge facilities, or intermodal freight terminals within the City of Corcoran. Most truck traffic on TH 55 is passing through Corcoran to locations within the metro area. Data from MnDOT indicates a Heavy Commercial Average Annual Daily Traffic volume of 500-999 vehicles per day on TH 55 in Corcoran. Commercial trips on other roadways in Corcoran are either traveling through or delivering goods to local businesses. aviation FacilitiEs There are currently no public aviation facilities in the City of Corcoran. However, the City is within the region’s general airspace which needs to be protected from potential obstructions to air navigation. Under Minnesota Statutes §360, the State regulates the height of structures as they are defined and enforced under Aeronautics Rules and Regulations 8800.1200 Criteria for Determining Air Navigation Obstructions. Subparagraph 4(B) states: Objects more than 200 feet above the ground or more than 200 feet above the established airport elevation, whichever gives the higher elevation, within 3 nautical miles of the nearest runway of an airport, and increasing in the proportion of the 100 feet for each additional nautical mile of distance from the airport but not exceeding 500 feet above ground, is a general obstruction. Notification to MnDOT Aeronautics is required when any object, as defined above, would affect general airspace. The City will include the following requirements with all applications: Notification: Any applicant or property owner who proposes any construction or alteration that would exceed a height of 200 feet above ground level at the site, or any construction or alteration of greater height than an imaginary surface extending upward and outward at a slope of 100:1 from the nearest point of the nearest runway of a public airport shall notify the Commissioner at least 30 days in advance. Local reporting is in addition to any Federal permitting/review process (FAA Form 7460-8) involving a sponsor/ proposal. Bicycling and Walking The existing and planned on-road and off-road bicycle facilities are shown in Map 5-1. In the 2040 Met Council Transportation Policy Plan, County Road 19 and County Road 101 are classified asTier 2 alignments for bicycle facilities. No other alignments or corridors are planned in Corcoran. As the area develops, enhancing the non-motorized facilities within Corcoran will be important in order to improve transportation sustainability within the City. Improved facilities and connections provide alternatives to driving, support options for residents who do not have a personal vehicle, and promotes healthy lifestyles and exercise. The City’s integrated transportation network will include appealing and safe streets that are accessible to people walking and biking, as well as people driving motor vehicles. A combination of off-road and on-street bike and pedestrian facilities are included to give people safe and convenient options for active transportation. 2040 future transPortation system highWays and strEEts 2040 traffiC ProjeCtions Year 2040 annual average daily traffic (AADT) forecasts were developed using data provided by the Metropolitan Council from the travel demand model. Future AADT for the roadways in Corcoran were projected based on the future land use, TAZ data, and population growth estimates. The volumes shown are generally lower than 2030 forecasts presented in the Hennepin County transportation plan. Those forecasts were developed in the 2005-2007 time frame, when development pressure in this area was higher. Since the 2030 volumes were developed, the Metropolitan Council has shifted regional growth to urban and developed areas, resulting in lower population and employment forecasts for Corcoran. The 2040 AADT volume forecasts are shown in Map 6-6. Map 6-6: 2040 Average Daily Traffic Volumes (See page 101 for large size map.) jurisdiCtional transfers (PlanneD or PossiBle) The 2030 Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP) suggests turning County Road 10 and County Road 101 back to the City. The City does not support these turn backs. The decision has not been finalized and no timeframe has been designated.The City is continuing to work with Hennepin County to determine the feasibility of these possible changes. funCtional ClassifiCation Changes (PlanneD or PossiBle) According to the 2030 Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP), County Road 116 and County Road 117 through Corcoran could warrant a change in either their functional classification or funding designation. These roadway segments should be monitored. The City of Corcoran should communicate with Hennepin County and the Metropolitan Council regarding any changes in either functional classification or funding designations that may arise. County road 116 (souThern nw hennePin sTuDy area BounDary To CounTy roaD 13) County Road 116 from the southern boundary of the NW Hennepin Study area to County Road 13 is recommended to be upgraded from a “B” Minor Arterial to an “A” Minor Arterial Reliever. This route provides important north-south continuity within the area to more urbanized metro areas to the south. In addition, County Road 116 is proposed to be extended as an overpass from Territorial Road to County Road 13. This overpass will play a similar role to County Road 117 in terms of providing local traffic circulation without congesting the busy interchange areas. County road 117 (CounTy roaD 19 To CounTy roaD 116) Currently, this route is a “B” Minor Arterial. This route helps provide east-west continuity in the area. This route provides connectivity into Wright County and through an extension to the east across I-94 will provide connectivity to County Road 81 and industrial/commercial areas along County Road 81. Therefore, this section of County Road 117 is recommended to be classified as an “A” Minor Arterial Connector due to its connectivity, spacing from County Road 30 and connection to other proposed north-south minor arterials such as County Road 116 and County Road 101. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake 8,200 2,520 11,900 14,800 610 12,0001,6602,2001,000480 4,600 4,000 3,360 4,70020,000 1,0 7 0 4, 2 0 0 8,9 0 0 600 7, 6 0 0 12 , 0 0 0 8, 5 0 0 1, 0 0 0 69 0 34 0 1, 2 0 0 45 0 9, 4 0 0 11 , 7 0 0 12 , 6 0 0 16 , 2 0 0 11 , 1 0 0 8, 8 0 0 4,800 3,400 3,000 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Duffney Dr D St 81stPlN V a lle y V ie w Rd Hackamore Rd Oakdale Dr BridleP a t h Carriage Way J e f f re y Ln G St Abilene Ln Ma p l e Ln HillsideDr HuntersRdg County Road 30 Br o c k t o n L n N 75th Ave N Heat her Ln Schutte Farm R d Pion e e r T r l Hidden Ponds Dr Trail Haven Rd 109th Ave N County Roa d 1 0 C h e r r y Ln Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n ParkTrail Rd H o r s e s h o e BendDr RushC r e e k Blvd Rush Creek Dr Coun t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wil l o w D r C S t Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 JulieAnnDr Ja c kie Ln Corc o ranTrl W Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Corcoran Trl E Ca i n R d T r a il L n Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd 66thAveN Mo h a w k D r Wagon Wheel Ln Larkin Rd PatrickPl 70thAveN E a gle Rid g e Rd Lily PondLn Darrell Ln Fo x l i n e D r Ga r d e n Ln Oswald FarmRd Strehler Rd Cain Pl Sn y d e r Rd 65 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old S e ttle rs R d Ka l k Road Ext County Ro a d 11 7 Tri den RidgeCir StiegRd Be c h t o l d R d W i nd mi ll D r Ka l k R d Schutte Rd RushMeadowL nCo un t ry Hills Dr Meister Rd F ox Va lle y Dr M y s t iqu e Dr Hage Dr 93rd Ave N Schutte Pl SunnyHill Ln Bra nd yw ine Rd Ch isholm T r l Tessmer Rd Crow Hassan Park Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r M e a d o w CreekDr HighBluffLn Winchester Trl JubertLn R u s h C r eek RushCreek SouthFork Ru s h C r eek Sou th F o rkRushCreek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\2040 ADT.mxdDate: 1/8/2019Time: 7:02:45 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-62040 Average DailyTraffic Volumes (AADT) 11,230 2040 AADT Forecasts Source:2040 Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes (Metropolitan Council) 89 County road 30 extension (CounTy roaD 19 To The wesT sTuDy area BounDary) Currently, County Road 30 is designated as an “A” Minor Arterial Connector from I-94 to County Road 19. The future local system plan identified a continuation of this route to the west into Wright County. This route is anticipated to be the main east-west mobility corridor as it serves Corcoran, Rogers as well as traffic from Wright County through a future crossing of the Crow River. At I-94, County Road 30 is planned to be realigned in the future to connect as the western leg of the I-94/TH 610 interchange. Due to the importance of this route as a mobility corridor, it is recommended by the study to be classified as an “A” Minor Arterial Expander. Map 6-7 shows the future 2040 functional classification of roadways. Map 6-7: 2040 Roadway Functional Classification (See page 103 for large size map.) roadWay caPacity analysis The projected future roadway network was analyzed at a planning level using year 2040 volume projections. No improvements were assumed to the roadway network, with the exception of TH 55. TH 55 was analyzed as a 4-lane segment with left and right turn lanes. It can be seen from these results that improvements may be necessary at some locations to avoid undesirable levels of service. Improvements such as adding left and right turn lanes at major intersections will improvement the overall level of service for roadway sections by decreasing delays and improving traffic flow. Corcoran will continue to monitor traffic operations and pursue improvements at locations when necessary to provide acceptable levels of service. Roadway capacities for 2040 for selected roadway segments as shown in Table 6-4. taBle 6-4: 2040 Planning los Segment From - To Los Cty Rd 116 Entire segment in Corcoran E Cty Rd 101 Entire segment bordering Corcoran D Cty Rd 10/Cty Rd 50 Commerce Street to Cty Rd 101 E Cty Rd 30 Cain Road – Cty Rd 101 E Cty Rd 30 Cty Rd 19 – Cain Road D Cty Rd 117 West City Boundary – Cty Rd 116 B Cty Rd 19 Cty Rd 50 – Cty Rd 117 E Cty Rd 50 Cty Rd 19 – Cty Rd 10 C Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pion e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 1 0 Horseshoe Trl C oun ty R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blu e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C re e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek S outh F orkRush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\2040 Roadway Funtional Classification.mxdDate: 1/30/2019Time: 2:01:05 PMUser: shujc0243 Principal ArterialA Minor RelieverA Minor ExpanderProposed A Minor ExpanderA Minor ConnectorProposed A Minor ConnectorMajor CollectorProposed Major CollectorMinor CollectorProposed Minor CollectorMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-72040 Roadway Functional Classification Table 6-5 shows the existing and future number of lanes for selected roadway segments. taBle 6-5: numBer of lanes Segment From-To Existing Future TH 55 Entire segment in Corcoran 2 2 CR 116 Entire segment in Corcoran 2 2 CSAH 19 Entire segment in Corcoran 2 2 CSAH 30 Entire segment in Corcoran 2 4 CSAH 50 Entire segment in Corcoran 2 2 CSAH 101 Entire segment in Corcoran 2 2 The Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP) also identifies County Road 116, County Road 30, and County Road 101 as having possible/probable congestion in 2040. As development occurs within the City, area roadways should be monitored to address congestion issues before it becomes significant. Hennepin County has identified improvements that were used in their Base 2040 Roadway Network. This itemized list of improvements includes projects that are anticipated to be implemented by 2040 due to their inclusion in CIP’s, the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or some action that makes the improvement likely. Improvements identified by the County that would affect Corcoran are identified in Table 6-6. taBle 6-6: hennePin County – Base 2040 roadWay netWork imProvements Roadway Termini City MnDOT Trunk Highway 101 Conversion to limited access – north segment Rogers Hennepin County County Road 101 Reconstruct and add lanes with Laurel Creek Rogers County Road 116 Fletcher Bypass – extension to County Road 81 Rogers The County also identified Optional 2030 Roadway Network Improvements. This roadway network incorporates some roadway elements that have been proposed by this and other studies and are still under evaluation. Table 6-7 identifies improvements that may impact Corcoran. taBle 6-7: hennePin County – oPtional 2030 roadWay netWork imProvements Roadway Termini City MnDOT I-94 / Brockton Lane New directional interchange Rogers Hennepin County County Road 30 New Crow River Bridge to Wright Co Cty Rd 144 Greenfield Additional traffic studies will be needed prior to implementing any roadway improvements to ensure proper planning. 91 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek Sout h Fork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing Roadway Jurisdiction.mxd Date: 1/7/2019Time: 3:42:48 PMUser: ShuJC0243 State HighwayCounty State Aid Highway (CSAH)County RoadMunicipal State Aid Street (MSAS)Municipal StreetMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-1Existing Roadway Jurisdiction Source:Existing Roadway Jurisdiction (MN DOT) 93 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek Sout h Fork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing Roadway Funtional Classification.mxd Date: 1/8/2019Time: 6:37:13 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Principal ArterialA Minor ExpanderA Minor ConnectorOther ArterialMajor CollectorMinor CollectorMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-2Existing Roadway Functional Classification Source:Existing Roadway Functional Classifictaion (Metropolitan Council) 95 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek Sou th F o r kRush Creek RushCreek 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785786 787 788789 790 871 872 875 897 898 899 900901 902 909 911 913 914 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Traffic Analysis Zones.mxd Date: 1/8/2019Time: 6:39:27 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Traffic Analysis ZonesMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-3Traffic Analysis Zones Source:Traffic Analysis Zones (Metropolitan Council) 97 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake 15,600 6, 6 0 0 6, 3 0 0 5, 9 0 0 8, 9 0 0 9, 3 0 0 7, 3 0 0 7, 3 0 0 6,200 9, 6 0 0 9, 6 0 0 6, 6 0 0 1,450 2,200 2,8003,050 3,050 2,400 5,900 2,30 0 8,600 10,700 6, 6 0 0 6, 3 0 0 5, 2 0 0 2, 7 0 0 6, 4 0 0 4, 5 5 0 2,150 2,400 1,600 1,100 1,200 175 285 290 57 0 225 480 8301,050 21 5 25 0 16 0 23 5 45 5 39 5 37 0 51 0 3,150 99 0 690 1, 4 0 0 1,500 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Duffney Dr D St 81st P l N V a l l e y V i e w Rd Hackamore Rd Oakdale Dr B r i d l e P a t h J e f f r e y L n G S t Abilene Ln Ma p l e Ln Hills ide Dr Hunters Rdg Steeple C hase L n County Road 30 Br o c k t o n L n N 75th Ave N He a t h e r Ln Sc hu t t e Farm R d Pio n e e r T r l Hidden P onds Dr Tr a i l H a v e n R d 109th Ave N County Ro a d 1 0 C h e r r y Ln Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n Park Trail Rd H o r s e s h o e Bend D r Rush C r e e k Blvd Rush Cre e k Dr Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Wi l l o w D r C S t Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Julie Ann Dr J a c k i e Ln C orc o ra n Trl W Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Co rc o ra n T r l E Ca i n R d T r a i l L n Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Eb e r t Rd S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Wagon Wheel Ln Larkin Rd PatrickPl 70thAveN E a gl e R i d g e Rd Lily Pond Ln Darrell Ln Fo x l i n e D r Ga r d e n Ln Oswald FarmRd Strehler Rd C ain Pl Sn y d e r Rd 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln O ld S e t tl e r s R d Ka l k Road Ext County R o a d 1 1 7 Tr i den RidgeCir Stie g R d Be c h t o l d R d W i n d m i l l D r Ka l k R d Schutte Rd RushMeadowL n C o u n t r y Hills D r Meister Rd F o x V a l le y Dr M y s t iqu e Dr H a g e Dr 93rd Ave N Sc hut t e P l S u n n yHill Ln B r a n d y w i n e Rd Ch isholm T r l Tessmer Rd Crow Hassan Park Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r M e a d o w Creek Dr HighBluffLn Winc hes t er Trl JubertLn R u s h C re e k RushCreek SouthFor k R u s h C r e e k Sou th F o r kRush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing ADT.mxd Date: 1/8/2019Time: 6:55:00 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-4Existing Annual AverageDaily Traffic Volumes (AADT) andHeavy Commercial AnnualAverage Daily Traffic (HCAADT) Source:Existing Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes(MN DOT, Hennepin County)Existing Heavy Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic Volume(MN DOT, Hennepin County) 2015 Trunk Highway AADT Volumes 2015 County Road AADT Volumes 2014 Local Street AADT Volumes 1,230 1,230 1,230 1,230 2017 HCAADT Volumes 99 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake CSAH 10/Larkin Rd/ Maple Hill Rd Intersection CSAH 10 Realignment Proposed CR10 Realignment Potential CR10 Turn Back Potential Functional Classification or Funding Designation Changes Potential Functional Classification or Funding Designation Changes CASH 117 Extension - Rogers Potential I-94/Brockton Interchange CSAH 10/116 Intersection R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek Sout h Fork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Trans Issues.mxd Date: 1/8/2019Time: 6:49:54 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-5Transportation Issue Areas 101 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake 8,200 2,520 11,900 14,800 610 12,0001,6602,2001,000480 4,600 4,000 3,360 4,70020,000 1,0 7 0 4, 2 0 0 8,9 0 0 600 7, 6 0 0 12 , 0 0 0 8, 5 0 0 1, 0 0 0 69 0 34 0 1, 2 0 0 45 0 9, 4 0 0 11 , 7 0 0 12 , 6 0 0 16 , 2 0 0 11 , 1 0 0 8, 8 0 0 4,800 3,400 3,000 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Duffney Dr D St 81st P l N V a l l e y V i e w Rd Hackamore Rd Oakdale Dr B ridleP a t h Carr iage Way J e f f r e y L n G S t Abilene Ln Ma p l e Ln Hills ide Dr Hunters Rdg County Road 30 Br o c k t o n L n N 75th Ave N He a t h e r Ln Sc hu t t e Farm R d Pio n e e r T r l Hidden P onds Dr Trail Haven Rd 109th Ave N County Ro a d 1 0 C h e r r y Ln Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n Park Trail Rd H o r s e s h o e Bend D r Rush C r e e k Blvd Rush Cre e k Dr Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r C S t Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Julie Ann Dr J a c k i e Ln C orc o ra n Trl W Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Co rc o ra n T r l E Ca i n R d T r a i l L n Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd 66thAveN Mo h a w k D r Wagon Wheel Ln Larkin Rd PatrickPl 70thAveN E a gl e R i d g e Rd Lily Pond Ln Darrell Ln Fo x l i n e D r Ga r d e n Ln Oswald FarmRd Strehler Rd C ain Pl Sn y d e r Rd 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln O ld S e t tl e r s R d Ka l k Road Ext County R o a d 1 1 7 Tr i den RidgeCir StiegRd Be c h t o l d R d W i n d m i l l D r Ka l k R d Schutte Rd RushMeadowL n C o u n t r y Hills D r Meister Rd F o x V a l le y Dr M y s t iqu e Dr H a g e Dr 93rd Ave N Sc hut t e P l S u n n yHill Ln B r a n d y w i n e Rd Ch isholm T r l Tessmer Rd Crow Hassan Park Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r M e a d o w Creek Dr HighBluffLn Winc hes t er Trl JubertLn R u s h C r e ek RushCreek SouthFor k R u s h C r e e k Sou th F o r kRush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\2040 ADT.mxd Date: 1/8/2019Time: 7:02:45 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-62040 Average DailyTraffic Volumes (AADT) 11,230 2040 AADT Forecasts Source:2040 Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes (Metropolitan Council) 102 103 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Se ttler s R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek S outh F ork Rush Creek RushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\2040 Roadway Funtional Classification.mxd Date: 1/30/2019Time: 2:01:05 PMUser: shujc0243 Principal ArterialA Minor RelieverA Minor ExpanderProposed A Minor ExpanderA Minor ConnectorProposed A Minor ConnectorMajor CollectorProposed Major CollectorMinor CollectorProposed Minor CollectorMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 6-72040 Roadway Functional Classification 104 105 CHAPTER 7: WASTEWATER goals anD PoliCes 107 MeTroPoliTan CounCil inTerCePTor ConneCTions 107 foreCasTs 108 Trunk saniTary sewer sysTeM Design 108 lanD use 108 esTiMaTeD average wasTewaTer flow 108 Design flows 109 Trunk saniTary sewer sysTeM sizing 109 infilTraTion anD inflow (i/i) 109 inDiviDual sewage TreaTMenT sysTeMs (isTs) 110 inTerCoMMuniTy flow ConneCTions 110 CenTralizeD wasTewaTer TreaTMenT sysTeMs 110 figures 7-1 Peak flow faCTors 109 TaBles 7-1 CiTy-wiDe PoPulaTion, householD anD 108 eMPloyMenT foreCasTs 7-2 sewereD PoPulaTion, householD, anD 108 eMPloyMenT foreCasTs 7-3 average wasTewaTer flow ProJeCTions 108 7-4 average wasTewaTer flow ProJeCTions By MDs ConneCTion 108 7-5 sysTeM Design wasTewaTer uniT 109 flow raTes 7-6 infilTraTion anD inflow goal 110 MaPs 7-1 exisTing saniTary sewer sysTeM 113 7-2 ProPoseD Trunk saniTary sewer sysTeM norTheasT DisTriCT 115 7-3 ProPoseD Trunk saniTary sewer sysTeM souTheasT DisTriCT 117 7-4 ProPoseD Trunk saniTary 119 sewer sysTeM souThwesT DisTriCT 7-5 suBsurfaCe sewage TreaTMenT sysTeMs 121 106 107 On May 28, 2014, the Metropolitan Council adopted an updated 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan (WRPP). The 2040 WRPP includes the metropolitan wastewater system plan with which local comprehensive plans must conform. The intent of this chapter is to describe Corcoran’s existing and proposed ultimate wastewater collection and disposal system and to demonstrate Corcoran’s conformance with Metropolitan Council wastewater system planning, providing specific information needed to meet the 2040 WRPP requirements. Metropolitan Council’s Environmental Services Division (MCES) operates the Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) that will ultimately provide wastewater service to the sewered portions of Corcoran. The MDS includes interceptor sewers, lift stations, forcemain, wastewater treatment plants, and other features necessary for the Metropolitan Council to operate a regional wastewater collection and treatment system. Corcoran currently has 2 connections to the MDS, 1 that is currently in use in the SE District and 1 that was recently constructed to the NE District that has not yet been utilized by the City. This section provides Corcoran’s projections for wastewater flow increases that Metropolitan Council can use for regional wastewater planning purposes, including whether capacity upgrades will be needed at the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The updated wastewater section reflects updated land use plans from what was envisioned in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. goals and PoliCies Goal 1: Construct the system including trunk and local collectors as development takes place within the City. Policy 1: Require developers to construct a system in a size and manner to support future needs of the system. Policy 2: Extend the system to adjacent properties as development takes place. Goal 2: Operate in an efficient and sanitary manner to protect public health, safety and welfare, to safeguard municpal finances, and to support development and economic vitality within the community. Policy 1: Implement preventative maintenance programs to protect and sustain the system. Policy 2: Restrict the installation and use of individual sewage treatment systems when necessary or appropriate. metroPolitan CounCil interCePtor ConneCtions Metropolitan Council has identified 3 connections to the MDS, 2 existing connections via the Elm Creek Interceptor and 1 future connection via the Maple Plain Interceptor. Corcoran’s planned service areas to each of the MDS connections are as follows: • Southwest (SW) Corcoran Connection at Node SW-5 This connection will serve SW Corcoran with connection to the Maple Plain Interceptor via Loretto. Forcemain construction from SW-5 to an unspecified location was assumed, though potential gravity connection should be explored as the details of an MCES extension to SW Corcoran become clearer. • Southeast (SE) Corcoran Connection at MCES Regional Lift Station L-80 This connection will serve the eastern portion of SE Corcoran via the South Corcoran Extension of the Elm Creek Interceptor. Construction of the gravity sewer (15-inch) portion of the extension has been completed to the Corcoran border at County Road 10, and the L-80 lift station will begin operation in early 2019. With the 2017 connection of the downtown area, until the L-80 lift station is operational, the MCES is implementing temporary wastewater pumping/hauling (i.e., this wastewater is allowed to accumulate in the City’s 15-inch gravity sewer upstream of a plug installed near Node SE-22). • Northeast (NE) Corcoran Connection at Node NE-18 (MCES Meter Station M310) This connection will serve NE Corcoran (and eventually also the western portion of SE Corcoran via diversion of wastewater to NE Corcoran). Construction of this meter station at the very NE corner of Corcoran was recently completed by MCES, providing access to the Rogers/Northeast Corcoran Leg of the Elm Creek Interceptor. The City initiated construction of the first trunk sewer connecting to this MCES Interceptor in December 2018, and anticipates substantial completion in July 2019. Corcoran only has two liftstations, the downtown lift station and the the Ravinia (County Road 101) lift station. These lift stations have capacities of 185 and 550 gpm, respectively, both of which are operating with current wastewater flows that are far below capacity. Corcoran’s existing sanitary sewer is shown on Map 7-1. Map 7-1: Existing Sanitary Sewer (See page 113 for large size map.) Corcoran’s proposed trunk sanitary sewer system and the 3 proposed connection points to the MDS are identified on Maps 7-2 through 7-4. There is potential for expansion as the City continues to grow allowing for system capacity increases. Actual growth rates will generally affect only the timing of trunk sewer construction and not the design of the system, i.e., an ultimate trunk system based on full development of the depicted service areas has been designed. Map 7-2: Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer System -- NE District (See page 115 for large size map.) WASTEWATER ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Rogers DuffneyDr County Road10 Hillside Dr Hunters Rd g Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Schutte Farm R d Hid d e n PondsDr Cherry Ln Robert Ln County Road 30 J a c kie Ln Ca i n R d Schutte L n Eb e r t R d Country Rd PatrickPl Lily PondLn Darrell Ln OswaldFarm Rd Oakdale Dr Dassel Ln Stieg R d Shannon L n Sc hutt e Rd Rush MeadowLn Mystique Dr 93rd Ave N S un ny Hill L n Br a n d y w i n e R d RushCreek SouthForkRushCreek S o u t h ForkRush Creek NE-M NE-S NE-C NE-A NE-B NE-D NE-G NE-H NE-L NE-E NE-JNE-I NE-F NE-N NE-T NE-K NE-R NE-V NE-U NE-O NE-Q NE-W NE-P SE-AP SE-AQ SE-AF 15' ' 30 ' ' 8' ' 8'' 30 ' ' 30'' 15 ' ' 30 ' ' 3 0 ' ' 1 0 ' ' 8' ' 10 ' ' 10'' 12 ' ' 15 ' ' 30'' 30 ' ' 12''15'' 6' ' 30'' 30 ' ' 30 ' ' NE-1 NE-2 NE-3 NE-4 NE-5 NE-6 NE-7 NE-8 NE-9 NE-10 NE-11 NE-12 NE-13(LS) NE-14 NE-15 NE-16 NE-17 NE-18 ElmCreek Interceptor NE-19 NE-20 NE-21 NE-22 NE-23 456710 456730 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,500 0 1,500750 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\NE Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer_LS.mxdDate: 1/8/2019Time: 7:15:58 AMUser: ShuJC0243 !Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Proposed Forcemain !H Sewer Nodes(LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-2Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - NE District #* $ $ $ $ $$ $ $$$$$$$$$$$$ $ $ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $ $ $$ $$ $ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $$ $ $ $ $$ $ $$ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $$$ $ $ $ $$ $ $$$$$ $ $$ $$$ $ $ $ $ $ $$$ $ $ $$ $ $$ $ $$ $$ $ $ $$ $$ $ $ $ $ #* #* $ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $ Future (2018) MCESL-80 Liftstation Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Medina CookLake Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Bridle Pa t h AbileneLn Larkin Rd CountyRoad10 Horseshoe Trl County Road 50 Gleason Pkwy Hu n t e r R d Ma p l e H i l l R d Old S e t t l e r s R d Bl u e B o n n e t D r LS-1 LS-2 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 12 8 8 8 8 15 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 18 8 8 15 8 8 8 15 8 8 15 8 8 15 8 6 15 15 6 6 4 12 456710 456750 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing Sanitary Sewer System.mxdDate: 1/8/2019Time: 7:14:24 AMUser: ShuJC0243 $Gravity SewerForcemain #*Lift StationMCES Forcemain #*MCES Lift StationMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-1Existing Sanitary Sewer System 108 Map 7-3: Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer System -- SE District (See page 117 for large size map.) Map 7-4: Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer System -- SW District (See page 119 for large size map.) foreCasts The Metropolitan Council requires municipalities to include adopted forecasts for population, households, and employment 10-year increments to 2040. Table 7-1 presents Metropolitan Council city-wide forecasts for Corcoran, as provided in Corcoran’s System Statement issued by the Metropolitan Council in September 2015. taBle 7-1: City-Wide PoPulation, household, and emPloyment foreCasts Year Total Population Total Households Total Employment 20101 5,379 1,867 1,093 2020 6,700 2,500 1,700 2030 8,900 3,570 2,010 2040 11,300 4,700 2,300 1 Actual Table 7-2 presents Metropolitan Council forecasts for sewered population, households, and employees for the City of Corcoran. Based on discussions between the Metropolitan Council and Corcoran in December 2018, forecasts were revised from numbers initially provided in the Corcoran Local Planning Handbook. taBle 7-2: seWered PoPulation, household, and emPloyment foreCasts Year Sewered Population Sewered Households Sewered Employment Unsewered Households2 20101 0 0 8 1,867 2020 1,550 580 1,020 1,920 2030 4,280 1,720 1,500 1,850 2040 7,650 3,190 1,840 1,510 1 Actual 2 Households served by individual sewage treatment systems. In addition to the forecasts in the preceding Tables 7-1 and 7-2, Metropolitan Council also requires cities to provide projected average wastewater flows through 2040. The Metropolitan Council uses these forecasts to plan all future interceptors and wastewater treatment work needed to provide adequate service. Table 7-3 presents average wastewater flow projections for Corcoran. The flow projections are based on the Metropolitan Council’s December 2018 revised forecasts provided in Table 7-2, using 60 gallons per day per sewered resident and 15 gallons per day per sewered employee (these values are utilized for new development). taBle 7-3: average WasteWater floW ProjeCtions Year Average Wastewater Flow Projections (MGD) 2010 0.00 2020 0.11 2030 0.28 2040 0.49 Table 7-4 presents the average wastewater flow projections identified in Table 7-3, split by connection point to the MDS, and with the corresponding MCES wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) location shown for reference. The locations of these connection points are identified on Maps 7-2 through 7-4. The projections for the Blue Lake WWTP southwestwest Corcoran was provided in the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 WRPP. The projections for the Metropolitan WWTP (southeast and northeast Corcoran combined) are essentially the Metropolitan Council’s December 2018 revised forecasts. The additional breakdown between southeast and northeast Corcoran reflects the City’s anticipated split between these 2 areas. taBle 7-4: average WasteWater floW ProjeCtions By mds ConneCtion Year SW Connection (MGD) SE Connection (MGD) NE Connection (MGD) Total Projected Average Flow (MGD) Blue Lake WWTP Metropolitan WWTP Metropolitan WWTP 2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2020 0.00 0.09 0.02 0.11 2030 0.00 0.20 0.08 0.28 2040 0.001 0.34 0.15 0.49 trunk sanitary seWer system design land usE Corcoran’s 2040 Land Use Plan serves as the basis for the development of the City’s trunk sanitary sewer system by estimating volumes of wastewater generated by each land use type. Detailed descriptions of the various land uses including density ranges can be found in the land use chapter. Appendix A presents Corcoran’s 2040 land use information split by sewer sub-district within the sewered portions of the City. Corcoran’s sewer sub- district boundaries are shown on Maps 7-2 through 7-4. EstiMatEd avEragE WastEWatEr FloWs Municipal wastewater is made up of a mixture of domestic sewage, commercial and industrial wastes, groundwater infiltration, and sometimes surface water inflows. With proper design and construction, groundwater infiltration and surface water inflows, commonly referred to as infiltration/ inflow (I/I), can be minimized. However, while Corcoran intends to minimize I/I into the trunk system, to be conservative a small amount of I/I (reflecting estimated I/I contributions into a new trunk sanitary sewer system) is included in the analysis and design of Corcoran’s trunk sewer system to provide an appropriate level of service to Corcoran. !! ! !! ! !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H City of Medina Forcemain to MaplePlain Interceptor via Loretto Ci t y o f Gr e e n f i e l d City of Medina ScottLake JubertLake Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Pion e e r T r l H ors e s h o e Bend Dr ChestnutDr Rolling Hills Rd Kimberly L n Wagon Wheel Ln County Road 50 65th Pl N Homestead Trl Wi n c h e s t e r T r l JubertLn SW-A SE-AG SW-K SW-J SW-I SW-L SW-F SW-G SW-D SW-E SW-C SW-B SW-H SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 SW-5(LS) SW-6 SW-7 (LS) SW-8 16 ' ' 2 4 ' ' 8" 18 " 12" 12"15" 8'' 456719 456750 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,100 0 1,100550 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\SW Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer.mxdDate: 1/8/2019Time: 7:32:26 AMUser: ShuJC0243 !Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Proposed Forcemain !H Sewer Nodes(LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-4Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - SW District ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H #* Lift Station 2 and ExistingForcemain will not be needed in Proposed Condition Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Medina MorinLake GooseLake Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Horseshoe Trl Bridle P ath Abilene Ln Homestead Trl C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 County Road 50 GleasonPkwy Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Corcoran Tr l W Ma p l e H i l l R d Corcora n TrlE Mo h a w k D r Tr a i l H a v e n R d Larkin Rd Ca i n R d O ld S e tt l e r s R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Schutte Pl St r e h l e r R d Bl u e B o n n e t D r South F o r k R u s h Cr eek SE-A SE-A SE-O SE-AO SE-AP SE-AQ SE-AT SE-ASSE-AR SE-D SE-K SE-M SE-C SE-I SE-H SE-B SE-F SE-E SE-G SE-N SE-T SE-L SE-S SE-J SE-R SE-Q SE-P SE-AM SE-V SE-ZSE-Y SE-U SE-X SE-W SE-AESE-AJ SE-AC SE-AB SE-AD SE-AASE-AK SE-AU SE-AV SE-AISE-AHSE-AG SE-AF SE-18 SE-36(LS) SE-37 SE-1 SE-2 SE-3 SE-4 SE-5 SE-6 SE-7SE-8 SE-9 SE-10 SE-11 SE-12 SE-13 SE-14 SE-15 SE-16 SE-17 SE-19 SE-20 SE-21 SE-22SE-23 SE-24 SE-25 SE-26 SE-27 SE-28 SE-29 SE-30 SE-31 SE-32 SE-33 SE-34 (LS) ElmCreek Interceptor SE-35 MCES LiftStation 8'' 12 ' ' 15'' 6'' 18' ' 8'' 18' ' 8'' 1 2 ' ' 8'' 15 ' ' 8'' 1 5 ' ' 10 ' ' 15 " 6' ' 8'' 15 " 10'' 18'' 18 ' ' 15'' 30' ' 15' ' 18 ' ' 12" 10' ' 12 ' ' 15 ' ' 10 ' ' 8'' 12 ' ' (1 0 ' ' E q ) 30 ' ' 15 ' ' 12'' 15 " 15'' 1 0 ' ' 18'' 1 2 ' ' 8'' 456710 456750 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,800 0 1,800900 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\SE Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer.mxdDate: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:32:33 PM User: ShuJC0243 !Existing Gravity !Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Existing ForcemainProposed ForcemainExisting MCES Forcemain(Interim Size Shown) #*MCES Lift Station !H Sewer Node (LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-3Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - SE District 109 To estimate average wastewater flows generated within the various sewer sub-districts, unit flow rates (in gallons per acre per day) are multiplied by the acreage for each land use category as identified in Appendix A. The unit flow rates for designing Corcoran’s trunk system are presented in Table 7-5. Wetland, right-of-way, and other undevelopable areas will not generate any sewer flow. The average wastewater flows for each sewer sub-district are presented in Appendix A. taBle 7-5: system design WasteWater unit floW rates Land Use Type Unit Flow Rate (Gallons/Acre/Day) Ag Preserve 0 Business Park 1,000 Commercial 1,000 Existing Residential 270 High Density Residential 2,000 Light Industrial 1,000 Low Density Residential 750 Medium Density Residential 1,050 Mixed Residential 1,200 Mixed Use 1,500 Parks/Open Space 0 Public/Semi-Public 250 Rural/Ag Residential 0 Undevelopable 0 The calculation of average wastewater flow rates for use in Corcoran’s trunk sanitary sewer design conservatively estimates wastewater generation at the municipal level so that no City trunk is undersized for its projected sewer sub-district. The values in Table 7-5 reflect conservative unit rate assumptions, particularly for commercial and industrial land uses, that allow Corcoran’s trunk system to accommodate higher wastewater-generating land uses such as manufacturing without being undersized. The conservative approach to estimating flows allows the City to remain flexible in planning future development by allowing for the possibility of localized development of higher-intensity use while also protecting against potential sewer backups. dEsign FloWs Corcoran’s trunk sanitary sewer system must be capable of conveying the anticipated peak wastewater flow rate (peak hour). The peak wastewater flow rate, or design flow, is calculated by multiplying the average flow rate by a variable peak flow multiplier, called the Peak Flow Factor (PFF). The PFF can generally be described as inversely proportional to the average flow rate (as the average wastewater flows increase, the applied PFF decreases). The PFF values applied in this study are shown in the following graphic as a curve and in tabular form. These values are generally conservative and widely used throughout the state for municipal sewer planning. The PFF values include a standard allowance for I/I, which is typical of new sanitary sewer construction as well as properly operating existing sewers. The first step in estimating Corcoran’s design flows involves designating each sewer sub-district to drain to a specific sewer node, generally the nearest down-gradient sewer node, within Corcoran’s proposed trunk sanitary sewer system. To calculate the design flows in the system, the total average flow to each sewer node is multiplied by the corresponding PFF. Calculation of design flows for Corcoran is summarized in Appendix A. Maps 7-2 through 7-4 identify the sewer sub-districts and sewer nodes included as part of the larger trunk sewer system. For the purposes of this narrative, a sewer node is identified within trunk sewer system at the following locations: • Upstream end of a trunk (generally considered 10” pipe and larger) sewer pipe • Trunk sewer junction points (nodes) • Trunk sewer pipe size changes • Lift stations For lift stations, a node is identified as a lift station when the entire wastewater flow reaching that lift station will pass through the lift station. However, there will also likely be a few isolated, small lift stations that are required to serve smaller portions of some sewer subdistricts, rather than attempting to deepen long lengths of trunk sewer to provide gravity service to such small areas. Locations for this type of small lift station are not identified on Maps 7-2 through 7-4 or in Appendix A. trunk sanitary sEWEr systEM sizing Corcoran’s trunk sanitary sewer system layout is identified on Maps 7-2 through 7-4. The pipe sizing for Corcoran’s trunk sewer system is based on several parameters including system design flows, trunk sewer length, and trunk sewer grade. Based on the trunk system layout on Maps 7-2 through 7-4, the trunk sewer length between sewer nodes is determined (the “straight-line” length is generally increased somewhat to allow for the longer, “meandering length” that will typically result from following the actual street locations). The trunk sewer grade is determined based on the minimum sewer depth at each sewer node necessary to provide service to the contributing sewer sub- district(s). The design flows calculated in Appendix A indicate the minimum conveyance capacity that must be provided in the trunk sanitary sewer system between 2 given sewer nodes. With all these design parameters in place, the trunk sewer pipe diameter between 2 sewer nodes is calculated. Corcoran’s trunk sanitary sewer system design calculations are presented in Appendix A. The system design presented in this Comprehensive Plan supersedes the trunk sanitary sewer system design information presented in Corcoran’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The wastewater flow projections in this Chapter, when combined with the sewer maps Maps 7-2 through 7-4 and design information contained in Appendix A, provide Metropolitan Council with Corcoran’s wastewater generation and trunk sewer design information as required in the 2040 WRPP. infiltration and infloW (i/i) The Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan (WRPP) states that the Metropolitan Council will establish I/I goals for all communities discharging wastewater to the MDS. As presented in the 2040 WRPP (Table A-2 thereof), I/I mitigation goals are determined by establishing the allowable peak flow rate, and are approximately equal to the previously-presented PFF values divided by 0.85. Communities that are identified as needing to eliminate excess I/I will be required to submit a work plan that details work activities to identify and eliminate sources of I/I. The Metropolitan Council can limit increases in service within those communities having excess I/I that do not demonstrate progress in reducing their excess I/I. The Metropolitan Council has not identified Corcoran as a community with observed excess I/I. Figure 7-1: Peak Flows 110 With Corcoran now beginning to utilize connections to the MDS, a primary wastewater system goal of Corcoran and the Metropolitan Council is the limitation of clear water inflow into wastewater collection systems. Based on the guidance in the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 WRPP and the projected average wastewater flows in Table 7-3, Corcoran’s corresponding I/I goals are presented in Table 7-6. 1Projections include both system design flow and I/I flow components. The allowable peak hourly flow rate projections presented in Table 7-6 are not allotments and can be modified by Corcoran through its regular Comprehensive Plan Update or Comprehensive Plan Amendments. It should be noted that the peak flow rates provided in Appendix A do not represent actual metered peak flows and therefore should not be confused with the City’s I/I goal in Table 7-6. Metropolitan Council will determine compliance with the City’s I/I goal based on actual metered flow data at each connection to the MDS. To limit the amount of I/I into Corcoran’s future trunk sanitary sewer system, the City has enacted an ordinance prohibiting connections such as surface water and sump pump connections to the trunk sanitary sewer system. individual seWage treatment systems (ists) The majority of residences (approximately 1,900) are on ISTS in Corcoran. Hennepin County is the responsible authority for permitting and tracking the installation, operation, maintenance, and enforcement of all ISTS in Corcoran. Current Approach to ISTS: • ISTS are abandoned when the structure is connected to the MCES sewer system. • There are an estimated total of 1,900 ISTS in Corcoran which are shown on Map 7-5. The majority will remain in place, since they are outside the MUSA. • Corcoran’s role in managing ISTS for compliance involves cooperating with Hennepin County as the ISTS authority. Map 7-5: Unsewered Areas (See page 121 for large size map.) interCommunity floW ConneCtions The only intercommunity connection for Corcoran is in SE Corcoran, where a very small flow (0.02 mgd peak flow) from a few houses flows into Maple Grove (subdistrict SE-A). Corcoran currently has no other intercommunity flow connections to neighboring municipalities. CentraliZed WasteWater treatment systems Corcoran has a current ordinance regulating the siting, maintenance, and monitoring of centralized wastewater treatment systems. Section 940 of the Corcoran Code requires that proposed centralized wastewater treatment systems be compliant with MPCA standards, comply with all City requirements, and have no adverse impact on the environment or neighboring properties. Corcoran City Code also requires that a management plan identifying an annual schedule for maintenance, inspection, and monitoring of the centralized wastewater treatment system be provided to the City for approval. Currently, there is 1 centralized wastewater treatment system in Corcoran within the manufactured home park, Maple Hill Estates. This system is anticipated to be connected to the existing City sewer in 2019 (connection near node SE-24). Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl County R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blu e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( ") !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( R u s h C re e k RushCreek South F o r k Rush Creek SouthForkRushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\UnSewered Areas.mxdDate: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:28:46 PM User: ShuJC0243 !(Residential Properties SSTS(Approx. 1,624) ")Centralized Wastewater Treatment System !(Commercial and Industrial SSTS (Approx. 42)Municipal BoundaryStreamsLake/Open Water2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel Boundaries Map 7-5Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems Source:Approximate SSTS Locations (Metropolitan Council) taBle 7-6: infiltration and infloW goal Year Allowable Peak Hourly Flow Rate Projections1 (Mgd) 2010 0.00 2020 0.48 2030 1.20 2040 2.01 111 113 #* $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $$$$$$$ $$$$$ $ $ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $$ $ $ $ $$ $ $$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $ $$ $ $$$$$ $ $ $ $$$ $ $ $ $ $ $$$ $ $ $$ $ $$ $ $$ $$ $ $ $$ $$ $ $ $ $ #* #* $ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $ Future (2018) MCES L-80 Liftstation Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Medina Cook Lake Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Bridle P a t h Abilene Ln Larkin Rd CountyRoad10 Horseshoe Trl County Road 50 Gleason Pkwy Hu n t e r R d Ma p l e H i l l R d O l d S e t t l e r s R d Bl u e B o n n e t D r LS-1 LS-2 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 12 8 8 8 8 15 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 18 8 8 15 8 8 8 15 8 8 15 8 8 15 8 6 15 15 6 6 4 12 456710 456750 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing Sanitary Sewer System.mxd Date: 1/8/2019Time: 7:14:24 AMUser: ShuJC0243 $Gravity SewerForcemain #*Lift StationMCES Forcemain #*MCES Lift StationMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-1Existing Sanitary Sewer System 115 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Rogers DuffneyDr County Road 10 Hillside Dr Hunt ers R d g Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Schutte Farm R d H i d d e n PondsDr C herry Ln Robert Ln C ount y Road 30 J a c k i e L n Ca i n R d Schutte L n Eb e r t R d Country Rd Pat ric k Pl Lily Pond Ln Darrell Ln Osw aldFarm Rd Oakdale Dr Dassel Ln Stie g R d Shannon L n S c hu t t e Rd Rush Meadow Ln My st ique Dr 93rd Ave N S u n n y Hill L n Br a n d y w i n e R d Rush Creek SouthForkRushCreek S o u t h ForkRush Creek NE-M NE-S NE-C NE-A NE-B NE-D NE-G NE-H NE-L NE-E NE-JNE-I NE-F NE-N NE-T NE-K NE-R NE-V NE-U NE-O NE-Q NE-W NE-P SE-AP SE-AQ SE-AF 15 ' ' 30 ' ' 8' ' 8'' 30 ' ' 30'' 15 ' ' 30 ' ' 3 0 ' ' 1 0 ' ' 8' ' 10 ' ' 10'' 12 ' ' 15 ' ' 30'' 30 ' ' 12''15'' 6' ' 30'' 30 ' ' 30 ' ' NE-1 NE-2 NE-3 NE-4 NE-5 NE-6 NE-7 NE-8 NE-9 NE-10 NE-11 NE-12 NE-13 (LS) NE-14 NE-15 NE-16 NE-17 NE-18 Elm Creek Interceptor NE-19 NE-20 NE-21 NE-22 NE-23 456710 456730 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,500 0 1,500750 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\NE Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer_LS.mxd Date: 1/8/2019Time: 7:15:58 AMUser: ShuJC0243 !Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Proposed Forcemain !H Sewer Nodes(LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-2Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - NE District 117 ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H #* Lift Station 2 and Existing Forcemain will not be needed in Proposed Condition Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Medina Morin Lake Goose Lake Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Horseshoe Trl Brid l e P a t h Abilene Ln Homestead Trl C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 County Road 50 GleasonPkwy Wi l l o w D r Hunt er R d Corcoran T r l W Ma p l e H i l l R d Corcora n Trl E Mo h a w k D r Tr a i l H a v e n R d Larkin Rd Ca i n R d O ld S e t t l e r s R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Schutte Pl St r e h l e r R d Bl u e B o n n e t D r S outh F o r k R u s h C r e e k SE-A SE-A SE-O SE-AO SE-AP SE-AQ SE-AT SE-ASSE-AR SE-D SE-K SE-M SE-C SE-I SE-H SE-B SE-F SE-E SE-G SE-N SE-T SE-L SE-S SE-J SE-R SE-Q SE-P SE-AM SE-V SE-ZSE-Y SE-U SE-X SE-W SE-AESE-AJ SE-AC SE-AB SE-AD SE-AASE-AK SE-AU SE-AV SE-AISE-AHSE-AG SE-AF SE-18 SE-36 (LS) SE-37 SE-1 SE-2 SE-3 SE-4 SE-5 SE-6 SE-7SE-8 SE-9 SE-10 SE-11 SE-12 SE-13 SE-14 SE-15 SE-16 SE-17 SE-19 SE-20 SE-21 SE-22SE-23 SE-24 SE-25 SE-26 SE-27 SE-28 SE-29 SE-30 SE-31 SE-32 SE-33 SE-34 (LS) Elm Creek Interceptor SE-35 MCES Lift Station 8'' 1 2 ' ' 15'' 6'' 18 ' ' 8'' 18 ' ' 8'' 1 2 ' ' 8'' 15 ' ' 8'' 1 5 ' ' 10 ' ' 15 " 6' ' 8'' 15 " 10'' 18'' 18 ' ' 15'' 30'' 15' ' 18 ' ' 12" 10'' 12 ' ' 1 5 ' ' 10 ' ' 8'' 12 ' ' (1 0 ' ' E q ) 30 ' ' 1 5 ' ' 12'' 15 " 15'' 1 0 ' ' 18'' 1 2 ' ' 8'' 456710 456750 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,800 0 1,800900 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\SE Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer.mxd Date: 1/15/2019Time: 1:32:33 PMUser: ShuJC0243 !Existing Gravity !Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Existing ForcemainProposed ForcemainExisting MCES Forcemain(Interim Size Shown) #*MCES Lift Station !H Sewer Node(LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-3Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - SE District 119 !! ! !! ! !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H City of Medina Forcemain to Maple Plain Interceptor via Loretto Ci t y o f Gr e e n f i e l d City of Medina Scott Lake Jubert Lake Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Pio n e e r T r l H o rs e s h o e B e n d D r Che s t nut Dr Rolling Hills Rd Kimberly L n Wa gon W h e e l Ln County Road 50 65th Pl N Homestead Trl Wi n c h e s t e r T r l JubertLn SW-A SE-AG SW-K SW-J SW-I SW-L SW-F SW-G SW-D SW-E SW-C SW-B SW-H SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 (LS) SW-6 SW-7 (LS) SW-8 16 ' ' 2 4 ' ' 8" 18 " 12" 12"15" 8'' 456719 456750 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,100 0 1,100550 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\SW Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer.mxd Date: 1/8/2019Time: 7:32:26 AMUser: ShuJC0243 !Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Proposed Forcemain !H Sewer Nodes(LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-4Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - SW District 120 121 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S et tle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( ") !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\UnSewered Areas.mxd Date: 1/15/2019Time: 1:28:46 PMUser: ShuJC0243 !(Residential Properties SSTS(Approx. 1,624) ")Centralized Wastewater Treatment System !(Commercial and Industrial SSTS (Approx. 42)Municipal BoundaryStreamsLake/Open Water2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel Boundaries Map 7-5Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems Source:Approximate SSTS Locations (Metropolitan Council) 122 123 CHAPTER 8: SURFACE WATER goals anD PoliCes 125 CurrenT ConDiTions 126 ProBleMs anD soluTions 126 TaBles 8-1 elM Creek waTersheD BounDaries 126 MaPs 8-1 waTersheD ManageMenT orgnaizaTions anD Drainage PaTTerns 127 124 125 The City of Corcoran is rich with wetlands, streams, and lakes, and it is committed to protecting and restoring these important resources. To support that commitment and meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, the Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Statutes §103B.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410, Corcoran prepared a Local Surface Water Management Plan (Local Plan) to assess the current condition of its surface waters, identify existing or potential problems related to surface water management, and develop and implement solutions. The Local Plan must be included as a chapter in the Comprehensive Plan. The full Local Plan is in Appendix B. Chapter 8 Surface Water provides a summary of Cocoran’s local surface water management plan. goals and PoliCies Corcoran’s goals and policies for stormwater management are developed to reflect and support the City’s commitments to protecting surface water quality. These commitments are documented primarily in the City’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and its Local Surface Water Management Plan (Local Plan), but they also reflect the goals and policies of the Elm Creek Watershed Commission (Commission) and those of other organizations and agencies that set laws, rules and standards or offer guidance regarding surface water protection and improvement. The Commission’s Third Generation Watershed Management Plan (WMP) identifies several goal areas and associated policies. Because the WMP guides much of the Local Plan content, and because the issues and goals identified in the WMP reflect similarly important issues in Corcoran, the City has developed policies within the same goal areas: • Water quantity • Water quality • Groundwater • Wetlands • Drainage Systems GOAL 1: Support the goals of the Commission to manage the quantity of stormwater runoff. Policy 1: As land is developed or redeveloped, abide by the Commission’s Rules and Standards regarding water quantity. Policy 2: As appropriate, remove or support removal of unattached deadfall in Rush Creek and its tributaries. Policy 3: Review ordinances and policies for consistency with Commission goals and policies for water quantity. These includes ordinances and policies related to shorelands and floodplains. GOAL 2: Corcoran recognizes the importance of maintaining and improving water quality in its lakes, wetlands, and streams. Policy 1: As land is developed or redeveloped, abide by the Commission’s Rules and Standards regarding water quality. Policy 2: Continue reviewing, updating and implementing components of the City’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Policy 3: Participate in Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit renewals and revise the City’s SWPPP as needed. Policy 4: Participate in the development and implementation of TMDL and WRAPS studies by attending meetings, providing feedback and helping identify projects that may offer water quality benefits. Policy 5: As feasible, support or assist the Commission or other agencies with water quality monitoring. Policy 6: As feasible, support studies that identify water quality problems and solutions. This includes but is not limited to Subwatershed Assessments. Policy 7: Work with the Commission and other organizations and agencies, as appropriate, to pursue grant funding and other funding to support the development and implementation of water quality improvement projects. Policy 8: As needed, review City ordinances and policies for consistency with Commission goals and policies for water quality. These include ordinances and/or policies regarding manure management. GOAL 3: Many of the City’s residents and business owners rely on individual wells for water supply, and this will likely continue for the foreseeable future. To support groundwater recharge and protection, the City adopts the following policies. Policy 1: As land is developed or redeveloped, abide by the Commission’s Rules and Standards regarding groundwater quality, particularly those requiring abstraction and/or infiltration of runoff. Policy 2: Participate in the Commission’s efforts to identify appropriate, cost-effective Best Management Practices regarding abstraction/ infiltration and groundwater recharge. Policy 3: Participate in the Commission’s efforts to educate the community about groundwater and its connection to stormwater runoff and surface water quality. GOAL 4: Corcoran recognizes the importance of protecting its many wetlands. Minnesota’s Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) established rules regarding wetland management, and it requires the appointment of a Local Government Unit (LGU) to administer them. In recognition and support of wetland management goals and requirements, Corcoran adopts the following policies. Policy 1: As land is developed or redeveloped, abide by wetland buffer standards and established by local ordinance, Commission Rules and Standards, and state law. Policy 2: As needed, review City ordinances and policies for consistency with Commission Rules and Standards and state law regarding wetland buffers. Policy 3: As needed, review and revise the LGU agreement. This may include developing or updating an LGU contract or assuming the LGU role. GOAL 5: In Corcoran, stormwater drainage is accomplished primarily through public and private ditches. County ditches have been under the authority of Hennepin County, but if requested, the Commission will review and reconsider the appointment of ditch authority. To support that goal, the City adopts the following policy. Policy: Participate in Commission review of ditch authority. GOAL 6: City operations and programs regarding stormwater management are documented primarily in its SWPPP and its Local Surface Water Management Plan (Local Plan), the latter reflecting many of the goals and policies of the Commission’s WMP, including its goals for operations and programming. In support of those goals, the City adopts the following policies. Policy 1: Participate in Technical Advisory Committee meetings and regular meetings of the Elm Creek Watershed Commission. Policy 2: Continue the City’s stormwater education program, concentrating on high-priority topics identified in its SWPPP. Accept educational assistance from the Commission as it becomes available. Policy 3: As feasible, support and assist the Commission’s monitoring program to assess water quality, water quantity, and biotic integrity and to evaluate progress in meeting TMDL goals. Policy 4: Participate in developing Commission Rules and Standards regarding stormwater management, and as needed, review and revise local ordinances and policies for consistency with the Commission. Policy 5: As needed, request technical or financial assistance, or both, from the Commission to support stormwater management or water quality improvement projects. SURFACE WATER 126 The City of Corcoran is situated almost entirely in theRush Creek and Elm Creek Watersheds, a drainage basins that also includes parts of Rogers, Dayton, Champlin, Maple Grove, Plymouth, and Medina (Map 8-1). As a member of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (Commission) Corcoran and other cities manage the watershed’s surface water resources. Map 8-1: Watershed Management Organization and Drainage Patterns (See page 127 for large size map.) One of the duties of the Commission is to prepare Watershed Management Plans (WMPs) that set goals, policies, rules, and standards for surface water management. The most recent WMP, the Third Generation Watershed Management Plan, was approved in 2015. According to Minnesota law, Corcoran must prepare a Local Plan after a WMP is updated to ensure that the City’s approach to managing surface water resources is consistent with that of the Commission. This Local Plan satisfies that requirement. Other regulations also influence or dictate the City’s responsibilities regarding surface water management. They include the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit program, a federal and state initiative that requires the City to develop and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan; the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act; the Minnesota Buffer Law; and various Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies that aim to improve surface water quality by reducing the amount of pollution reaching our lakes, wetlands, and streams. Current Conditions An inventory of Corcoran’s land and water resources finds a mosaic of farms, businesses, homesteads, and residential developments in a historical setting of maple-basswood forest and wet prairie. Land use has changed significantly since the time before European settlement. Logging and farming began the transition, and the many drainage ditches and tiles in the City hint at the effort needed to convert characteristically wet soils into ones better suited for agriculture. Today Corcoran’s agricultural tradition remains strong, especially in the north and west parts of the City. Urban residential and commercial development is increasing from the east and south and is expected to continue. Urban services such as piped sewer and water already serve parts of southeast Corcoran and are anticipated for more of the region delineated by the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Development within the MUSA and elsewhere offers opportunities to install urban stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs), such as catch basins and stormwater treatment ponds, to prevent pollutants from being carried by stormwater runoff to surface waters. Both urban and rural BMPs will be important to improve surface water quality in Corcoran. Much of the North Fork of Rush Creek and part of the South Fork have been designated as impaired by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), meaning that water quality does not meet one or more state standards. The Elm Creek Watershed-wide TMDL Study and Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) identify measures that could correct the impairments. So do similar studies completed to correct impair- ments in the Pioneer-Sarah Creek Watershed, which includes a small area in southwest Corcoran. Applying the Commission’s strict rules for stormwater treatment as land is converted from agricultural to other uses is expected to yield benefits throughout the City. Additional projects are planned to reduce surface water pollution from targeted areas. Corcoran’s interest in preserving natural resources is not limited to its waters. Remnant native plant communities persist, and the City’s Parks and Trails Plan identifies search areas for greenway corridors and open spaces that co- incide with ecologically significant communities in upland and wetland areas. Such areas provide habitat for many species and help protect water quality by limiting impervious surfaces and maintaining vegetation that infiltrates stormwater runoff. ProBlems and solutions Some of the problems related to surface water management are described in the previous paragraphs. Additional issues and their possible solutions are identified in the WMP or by City staff, and all are discussed in the Local Plan. A summary of selected issues is given below. • Ordinance adoption and review: The City will adopt a manure management ordinance and will review its wetland and shoreland ordinances for consistency with watershed rules and other regula- tions regarding buffers. • Impaired waters projects: To help improve water quality in Rush Creek and elsewhere, the City will apply the Commission’s strict development standards, connect sanitary sewer at Maple Hill Es- tates to the MCES system, continue septic system education, and implement one or more recommendations from the Rush Creek Headwaters Subwatershed Assessment. Chloride management will also be a focus of the City’s efforts to protect water quality. • Operation, maintenance, and inspection of privately-owned stormwater BMPs: Among other measures, the City will continue inspecting BMPs in accordance with the City’s Stormwater Pollu- tion Prevention Plan. • Wetland improvements: The City will work with the Commission and other cities on potential wetland improvements north of the Ravinia development in Corcoran and south of the Laurel Creek development in Rogers. At the same time, the City will explore a possible stormwater pond retrofit in existing commericial and industrial areas in Corcoran. The City has prepared implementation and capital improvement plans that project expenses and possible funding sources through 2025. The Local Plan can be amended if needed to update these plans or other contents, with review by the Commission or the Metropolitan Council, if required. Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁÁÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁÁÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pion e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Cou nty Roa d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake RushCreek UnnamedStream Unna m e d Creek Un n a m e d C r e e k RushCreek R u s h C r e e k , S o ut h F o r k U n n amed S t r e a m U nna m ed Creek Sar a h Cree k Unna m e d Stre a m Unnam e d Creek Unnamed Stream No r t h F o r k Cr o w R i v e r South Fork Crow River Mississippi River - Twin Cities 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Watershed Districts and Drainage Patterns.mxdDate: 1/8/2019Time: 7:46:59 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Elm Creek WatershedManagement OrganizationPioneer-Sarah CreekWatershed ManagementOrganization Á Confluences and FlowDirectionMajor Watershed BoundaryMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesLake/Open Water 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLANMap 8-1Watershed Management Organizationsand Drainage Patterns Source:Watershed Management Organizations (Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources)Watershed and Flow Direction (MN DNR) Figure 8-1: Elm Creek Watershed. Corcoran’s approximate boundary is shown in red. 127 Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁÁÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁÁÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Á ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Á Á Á Á Á Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Set tlers R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake RushCreek UnnamedStream Unna m e d Cre e k U n n a m e d C r e e k Rush Creek R u s h C r e e k , S o u t h F o r k U n n a m e d S t r e a m U n n a m ed Creek Sa r a h Cree k Unn a m e d Stre a m Unna m e d Creek Unnamed Stream No r t h F o r k Cr o w R i v e r South Fork Crow River Mississippi River - Twin Cities 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Watershed Districts and Drainage Patterns.mxd Date: 1/8/2019Time: 7:46:59 AMUser: ShuJC0243 Elm Creek WatershedManagement OrganizationPioneer-Sarah CreekWatershed ManagementOrganization Á Confluences and FlowDirectionMajor Watershed BoundaryMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesLake/Open Water 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLANMap 8-1Watershed Management Organizationsand Drainage Patterns Source:Watershed Management Organizations (Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources)Watershed and Flow Direction (MN DNR) 128 129 CHAPTER 9: WATER SUPPLY PoliCies anD goals 131 waTer suPPly sysTeM 131 waTer DeManDs 131 ConCePTual fuTure waTer suPPly sysTeM 132 resourCe susTainaBiliTy 132 naTural resourCe iMPaCTs 132 susTainaBiliTy 132 sourCe waTer ProTeCTion Plan 132 waTer ConservaTion Plan 133 TaBles 9-1 CorCoran PoPulaTion anD waTer 131 DeManD ProJeCTions 9-2 CorCoran ConCePTual waTer 132 Tower sizing MaPs 9-1 exisTing waTer sysTeM 135 9-2 Trunk waTer sysTeM 137 130 131 Minnesota Statute §473.859 requires Water Supply Plans (also referred to as Water Emergency and Conservation Plans) to be completed for all local units of government in the 7-county Metropolitan Area as part of the local comprehensive planning process. Additionally, Minnesota Statute §103G.291 requires all public water suppliers within the metro area or that serve more than 1,000 people to have a Water Supply Plan approved by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). An approved Water Supply Plan is also a requirement to obtain a Water Appropriations Permit Amendment from the DNR. The City of Corcoran did not have a municipal water system at the time of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update, but with construction of new developments occurring since that time, Corcoran has initiated construction of its municipal water system. Water supply is currently provided via connection to the Maple Grove water supply system. A copy of the Corcoran Water Supply Plan is located in Appendix C. In southeast Corcoran, use of this water supply is currently expected to continue through 2030, though Corcoran may eventually move towards developing its own municipal supply wells and treatment system, as discussed further herein. In northeast Corcoran, water supply will initially be provided via connection to the Maple Grove water supply system; however, Corcoran will begin investigating and likely developing its own municpal supply prior to 2030. PoliCies and goals Corcoran is committed to developing a sustainable infrastructure system. A sustainable water supply meets the public demand and requires the responsible use of water now and in the future, without unacceptable social, economic, or environmental consequences. The City of Corcoran core principles include to: Goal 1: Construct the system including trunk and local collectors as development takes place withing the City. Policy 1: Require developers to construct a system in a size and manner to support future needs of the system. Policy 2: Extend the system to adjacent properties as development takes place. Goal 2: Operate in an efficient and sanitary manner to protect public health, safety and welfare, to safeguard municipal finances, and to support development and economic vitality within the community. Policy 1: Implement preventative maintenance programs to protect and sustain the system. Policy 2: Restrict the installation and use of private water supply wells when necessary or appropriate. Water suPPly system The first housing development in the City of Corcoran to have municipal water and sewer services initiated construction in 2014 (Ravinia in southeast Corcoran). The water distribution system was extended from the Maple Grove water supply system (see Map 9-1) for the existing system layout. The downtown area of Corcoran was also recently connected, and discussions with other developers regarding other new developments in both southeast and northeast Corcoran are underway. However, given the very limited development that has occurred to date, historical water use data is not presented herein. Other residents of Corcoran meet water demand through private water wells. As development continues in the City of Corcoran, expansion of the municipal water system will occur in those portions of the city designated for municipal services. The City of Corcoran has developed their initial conceptual water system plan to guide the creation and expansion of a municipal water supply, storage, and distribution system for city residents. Map 9-1: Existing Water System (See page 135 for large size map.) WatEr dEMands Future water demands are determined based on served population projections and typical per capita water demand. Most of the City of Corcoran’s current (2016) population of 5,498 meets water demands through private wells and therefore limited existing municipal water demand exists. As new development occurs going forward, municipal water demand will increase proportionally. It is assumed the portion of sewered households would directly relate to the portion of the population served by the future municipal water system. To determine future water demand, typical total per capita water use in the metro area is applied to the projected served population. The average day total per capita demand used is 150 gallons per capita day (gpcd), which is similar to the observed water demand in Maple Grove. It is important to note, the total per capita water demand includes water uses for residential, commercial, public, and industrial water demands. A maximum day total per capita demand of 450 gpcd is used to determine the size of the conceptual water system, reflecting a peaking factor of 3 for the ratio of peak day demand to average day demand. The Metropolitan Council projects the number of people per household to gradually fall going forward, going from 2.68 people per household in 2020 to 2.40 people per household in 2040. Using a typical value of 2.5 people per household, the peak day water demand is 1,125 gallons per day per household. Using the Metropolitan Council’s projected sewered populations, which are assumed to equal the municipal water populations, the projected water demands are presented in Table 9-1. taBle 9-1: City of CorCoran PoPulation and Water demand ProjeCtions Year Total Population Served Population* Average Day Demand Maximum Day Demand Annual Demand 2010 5,379 0 --- 2020 6,700 1,550 0.23 mgd 0.69 mgd 85 mgy 2030 8,900 4,280 0.64 mgd 1.92 mgd 234 mgy 2040 11,300 7,650 1.15 mgd 3.45 mgd 419 mgy *Served population calculated from Metropolitan Council served households projections. City of Corcoran water demand calculated based on an average day total per capita demand of 150 gpcd and maximum day total per capita demand of 450 gpcd (3.0 peaking factor). As discussed in Chapter 7, the Metropolitan Council has projected southwest Corcoran’s municipal services population to be still near zero in 2040, but just beginning to develop. The 2040 water demand is projected to be almost entirely from northeast and southeast Corcoran. The Metropolitan Council’s forecasts do not differentiate between these 2 areas, but using a similar City- anticipated split as presented in Chapter 7, the 2040 demand of 1.15 mgd will be approximately 0.80 mgd from southeast Corcoran and 0.35 mgd from northeast Corcoran. The Maple Grove water distribution model provided to Corcoran indicates that average day demands of approximately 2.5 mgd have been planned for at each of the 2 primary Maple Grove connection points (i.e., one that is currently supplying southeast Corcoran near County Road 10 and one future connection for the northeast near County Road 30), well above the 2040 projected demands. WATER SUPPLY !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( #* #* #* Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Medina CookLake Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Bridle P at h Abilene Ln Larkin Rd CountyRoad10 Horseshoe Trl County Road 50 Gleason Pkwy Hu n t e r R d Ma p l e H i l l R d O ld S e t t l e r s R d Bl u e B o n n e t D r 456710 456750 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing Water System.mxdDate: 1/15/2019Time: 1:35:26 PMUser: ShuJC0243 8'' Watermain12'' Watermain24'' Watermain #*Existing Supply Connectionwith Neighboring Communities #* Emergency Connection withNeighboring Communities(Normally Closed) !(HydrantMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 9-1Existing Water System 132 concEPtual FuturE WatEr suPPly systEM A conceptual layout of the future water supply system is shown on Map 9-2. The conceptual water system must consist of water supply to meet maximum day demands, water storage to meet peak hour demands and emergency storage needs, and a network of trunk and lateral water mains to deliver the water. Throughout the current planning period, the water supply is anticipated to be obtained from Maple Grove for southeast Corcoran. Initially, northeast Corcoran will utilize the Maple Grove water supply; however, Corcoran will begin investigating, and likely developing its own municipal supply within the planning period. Southwest Corcoran would most likely be supplied via a new Corcoran municipal system through a new City well, or possibly by private wells if development is limited. Conceptual water tower locations are shown on Map 9-2, but the exact location, timing and sizing of water towers will be dependent on future development locations and timing. Given that early water system operation essentially utilizes existing storage in Maple Grove, and given that adequate initial water supply pressures exist, no water towers are immediately needed in Corcoran at the very start of development activity. Given that development has been initiated in southeast Corcoran, more detailed water distribution model development has been conducted for this area, including the sizing and timing of the first water tower. The need for the first water tower in southeast Corcoran was determined to be at a peak day demand of approximately 1.75 mgd, which is anticipated to be a 1 mg tower near the downtown area. At projected demand growth, this tower does not appear to be needed until some point beyond the current planning period. At the same time this water tower is constructed, a booster station is anticipated to be constructed at the supply entrance point near County Road 10, unless Maple Grove has elected to install its own booster station for the adjacent Maple Grove area, which would likely provide the needed pressure boost in Corcoran. In northeast Corcoran, the first water tower will be needed when Corcoran switches form the Maple Grove supply to its own municipal supply. At a conceptual level, the preliminary sizing of the water towers shown on Map 9-2 are as indicated in Table 9-2, noting that this reflects a more fully- developed condition in the service area shown (not 2040). Map 9-2: Trunk Water System (See page 137 for large size map.) !O !O !O #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Coun t y Ro a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wil l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake 456710 R u s h Cr e e k RushCreek South F o r k RushCreek SouthFor kR ushCr eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Trunk Water System.mxdDate: 1/15/2019Time: 1:36:40 PMUser: ShuJC0243 Existing WatermainProposed Watermain !O Potential Water Tower Locations #*Existing Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #*Proposed Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #* Emergency Connection withNeighboring Communities(Normally Closed) #*Potential Water Storage #*Potential Booster StationPotential Future Well Exploration AreasMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 9-2Trunk Water System taBle 9-2: City of CorCoran ConCePtual Water toWer siZing Development Area Total Water Storage Southeast 2 mg (Two 1 mg) Northeast 1 mg Southwest 0.75 mg As noted previously, in the initial stages of development, the City of Corcoran will obtain its supply water from Maple Grove until such time that Corcoran develops its own water supply, which is anticipated to occur in northeast Corcoran first. This will require installation of Corcoran’s own water supply wells and water treatment system(s). For example, to provide a water supply for the 2040 served population in northeast Corcoran, the City of Corcoran will need to supply 750 gpm, which would potentially require 3 groundwater wells (using an assumed capacity of 400 gpm per well and assuming one standby well). Additional information on well capacity potential is included later in this chapter. The conceptual network of trunk water mains that will be needed to serve city growth is shown on Map 9-2, including potential locations for supply connections to neighboring communities. If, in the future, the City of Corcoran is able to supply water demand from its own municipal wells, the supply interconnections will then be maintained as emergency interconnections. The sizes of the trunk water mains shown on Map 9-2 will generally be 12-inch; however, some segments may be increased or decreased based on future design and distribution system modeling efforts. The estimated capacity of groundwater wells in the City of Corcoran needs to be verified through geological studies. When the city gets closer to the point at which municipal wells are desired, the city will conduct a well exploration program to identify capacity and location of future wells. Future groundwater wells will require disinfection and fluoridation, and groundwater testing will also be conducted to determine if additional water treatment is needed. As the municipal water system develops, decisions will be made that reflect the core principles, sound engineering, and fiscal reasonability to serve the residents of the City of Corcoran. resourCe sustainaBility The City of Corcoran is committed to a sustainable water supply meeting the public demand without unacceptable social, economic, or environmental consequences. Any future municipal groundwater wells will contain continuous monitoring of groundwater levels to allow the city to investigate well interference and potential natural resource impacts. The following sections detail potential natural resource impacts, groundwater sustainability, and source water protection. natural rEsourcE iMPacts In the current planning period, when Corcoran’s water supply system will rely on interconnection with the City of Maple Grove, additional pumping demands will be placed on the municipal wells in Maple Grove that could further increase impacts to natural resources within that community. Therefore, Maple Grove should consider any possible impacts of this increased pumping when updating their water supply plans. Relative to any future Corcoran municipal well installation, the 2015 Metropolitan Council System Statement identified very few surface water features that have interaction with the regional groundwater system. Only Jubert Lake and some areas of wetlands in northern Corcoran are indicated as receiving and discharging groundwater. A few scattered stream segments are also indicated as being supported by upwelling of groundwater. Future municipal well installation will need to consider the potential for any significant impacts to surface water bodies or water table aquifers. The 2015 System Statement identified one DNR groundwater level observation well just outside the northwestern corner of Corcoran. This well is indicated as having no trend in annual minimum groundwater levels (i.e., it is not trending up or down). sustainaBility Initially, it is planned or contracted that Corcoran will receive water through its interconnections with Maple Grove. At some point in the future, Corcoran expects to develop their own municipal water supply wells to supplement projected future demands. Any future municipal water supply wells for the City of Corcoran would likely utilize the Franconia-Ironton-Galesville (FIG) aquifer as the primary source of water supply. Since the FIG aquifer can be highly variable in the Twin Cities area regarding sustainability factors of recharge, storage, transmissivity, and specific capacity, an accurate estimate of overall sustainability cannot be determined until the city studies the potential yield of this aquifer in greater detail. Yields from the FIG aquifer can typically range between 200 – 1,000 gpm in the northern metro area. In addition to the FIG aquifer, it is also possible, but unlikely, the overlying drift aquifer may be utilized for large capacity water supply wells, if a sufficient thickness of coarse-grained, saturated sediments are located during a well siting study. Excellent drift aquifer deposits can produce yields greater than 1,000 gpm per well, when present. However, drift deposits tend to vary greatly over short distances, so the extent of good deposits can sometimes be limited to a small area. Underlying the FIG aquifer is the Mt. Simon sandstone aquifer, which is generally capable of supplying wells with yields ranging from 500 – 1,000 gpm. However, since recharge to this aquifer is somewhat limited and over- pumping the aquifer can create an unsustainable condition where water levels do not stabilize over time, the DNR has greatly limited the number of new high-capacity Mt. Simon wells in the 7-county metro area. It is unlikely Corcoran would be allowed to develop their municipal wells in the Mt. Simon aquifer unless it can be demonstrated that all other viable options for water supply have been exhausted. Further study will be required to better quantify the availability of groundwater for future municipal water supply wells. Studies will likely be a combination of investigation of existing well logs and geologic data in the area, along with a program of test drilling and test pumping at the sites thought to be most suitable for well exploration. 133 Finally, since many existing homes in Corcoran are served by private wells, the drilling and pumping of high capacity municipal wells introduces the remote chance of possible interference between wells. While it is expected that some of the area private wells will be abandoned and existing homes connected to the municipal water supply system, a number of private wells can also be expected to remain in the area as development occurs. Since private wells utilize shallow ground water, drawdown impacts from future municipal wells are likely. As potential yields and sustainability of the drift and FIG aquifer are examined in future years, potential impacts to private wells will need to be studied more closely. Any pumping tests in these aquifers should include measurement of water levels in nearby private wells, if possible, to quantify the impacts of well interference. sourcE WatEr ProtEction Plan Since Corcoran does not currently have municipal water supply wells, the city has not yet been required to complete a wellhead protection plan. Maple Grove has developed a plan, which covers Corcoran’s water supply. Only after Corcoran drills their own municipal water supply wells will the city will be required to develop their own wellhead protection plan. Generally, the city will have a minimum of 2 years from the date a new well goes online to complete the associated wellhead protection plan. The plan must then be updated a minimum of every ten years or whenever a new well is added to the water supply system, whichever comes first. Assuming no sources of surface water will be utilized as a municipal drinking water resource, no surface water protection plan will be required for the City of Corcoran. Water Conservation Plan The City of Corcoran understands conserving water can be a cost-effective way to reduce the need to construct and operate additional water supply facilities. The City will explore water conservation programs to reduce demand for water, improve the efficiency in use and reduce loss and waste of water. Water conservations goals for the City will include the following: • Reduce unaccounted water use. • Monitor residential and total per capita water use as development continues. • Reduce peak water demands. The city will develop a water conservation plan to detail each of the conservation goals and how the water system compares to “benchmark” metrics for each of the goals. Potential conservation programs the city will review include: • Metering all water usage and implementing meter testing. • Conduct water audits to calculate unaccounted for water use. • Establish conservation oriented water rates for City customers. • Regulation and enforcement of federal, state, and local water regulations. • Supply educational materials through various means to inform City residents. • Conduct regular reviews of the effectiveness of developed conservation programs. 135 !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( #* #* #* Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Medina Cook Lake Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Bridle P a t h Abilene Ln Larkin Rd CountyRoad10 Horseshoe Trl County Road 50 Gleason Pkwy Hu n t e r R d Ma p l e H i l l R d O l d S e t t l e r s R d Bl u e B o n n e t D r 456710 456750 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,200 0 1,200600 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Existing Water System.mxd Date: 1/15/2019Time: 1:35:26 PMUser: ShuJC0243 8'' Watermain12'' Watermain24'' Watermain #*Existing Supply Connectionwith Neighboring Communities #* Emergency Connection withNeighboring Communities(Normally Closed) !(HydrantMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 9-1Existing Water System 137 !O !O !O #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake 456710 R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Trunk Water System.mxd Date: 1/15/2019Time: 1:36:40 PMUser: ShuJC0243 Existing WatermainProposed Watermain !O Potential Water Tower Locations #*Existing Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #*Proposed Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #* Emergency Connection withNeighboring Communities(Normally Closed) #*Potential Water Storage #*Potential Booster StationPotential Future Well Exploration AreasMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 9-2Trunk Water System 138 139 CHAPTER 10: RESILIENCE goals anD PoliCies 141 sTorMwaTer 141 shorelanD anD flooDPlain ManageMenT 141 rural resilienCy 142 agriCulTural Preserves 142 solar aCCess ProTeCTion 142 TaBle 10-1 gross anD roofToP solar 145 resourCe CalCulaTions MaPs 10-1 solar insolaTion 145 140 141 Resiliency is an idea that describes a community’s capacity to respond and thrive under changing conditions while retaining healthy economic, social, and environmental systems. The concept of resiliency in the City of Corcoran is described here as it relates to a number of areas where the City can and should be prepared to respond to these changes. goals and PoliCies Goal 1: Explore additional opportunities to incentivize high quality stormwater management at a site scale and City scale. Policy 1: Consider design standards for high quality stormwater amenities. Policy 2: Consider strategies to encourage water reuse. Policy 3: Consider strategies to reduce the use of potable water for irrigation. Goal 2: Preserve floodplain areas for flood mitigation and water quality. Policy 1: Continue to limit development in floodplain and shoreland zones through the adopted Floodplain and Shoreland Overlay Districts. Policy 2: Continue to work with Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission to establish and enforce water quality standards. Goal 3: Build, strengthen and encourage economic, social, and environmental systems that reinforce and amplify rural attributes. Policy 1: Support practices that foster local food gardening practices and a local food gardening culture. Policy 2: Support development patterns that preserve agricultural land. Encourage landowners to reenroll in agricultural conservation and preservation programs in the non-MUSA area. Policy 3: Consider allowing small-scale rural tourism opportunities. Policy 4: Consider a dark skies lighting policy for Corcoran. Goal 4: Intensify the rural landscape with rich, diverse landscaping that supports pollinator species. Policy 1: Encourage plant diversity and pollinator-friendly landscapes on private and public land. Policy 2: Review lawn maintenance and open space ordinances to ensure that pollinator friendly landscapes are not prohibited or overly restricted. Policy 3: Consider adoption of City practices that reduce or eliminate the use of systemic pesticides on public owned and managed land. Goal 5: Develop land use policies that encourage preservation of agricultural activities and create developments that reflect the City’s agricultural roots. Policy 1: Encourage enrollment of land in the Rural/Ag Residential areas in the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program. Policy 2: Consider ordinances that create meaningful open spaces in both rural and urban areas of the City. Goal 6: Explore controlled/planned development of solar energy production as an alternative method to agriculture to preserve open space and lower density development. Policy 1: Continue to allow solar energy production as an accessory use. stormWater Clean water and a clean environment are essential to a healthy community and a healthy life. As stormwater flows over the landscape the moving water can pick up sediment, bacteria, nutrients, pathogens, chemicals, phosphorus, nitrogen and other pollutants. It can carry these pollutants into nearby watercourses like creeks, drains, culverts, rivers, and lakes. Careful stormwater management can reduce erosion, prevent loss of land, and keep sediment and pollutants out of water. Building a resilient stormwater system is as simple as recognizing that there are many opportunities to clean, reuse, or preserve water as it interacts with the built and unbuilt landscape. Intervening at many points in the water cycle creates resiliency because if one system temporarily fails, others are still in place to mitigate disaster scenarios. One example of resiliency in stormwater management is the City of Corcoran’s robust effort to identify and preserve natural resources, such as wetlands and critical green corridors. As described further in Chapter 8 of this document, these natural systems are a critical partner to engineered systems. The City of Corcoran also encourages development projects that preserve and reuse water on site so that new developments don’t impact and overtax existing or neighboring infrastructure. Stormwater management is also guided to be multipurpose, focusing on both water quality and the quality of experience that waterbodies offer City and rural landscapes. People are drawn to water and like to live, recreate, shop, and relax near attractive, clean water features. Creating stormwater management systems that also function as public amenities provides economic benefits for a City that far outweigh any up-front costs. shoreland and floodPlain management Shorelands and floodplains are low lying areas of land around waterbodies that take on excess water during period of high rainfall and flooding events. Floodplains, as an ecosystem, also provide a number of valuable ecosystem services such as improving water quality, providing habitat for wildlife, and groundwater recharge. Best practices for shorelands and floodplains include requiring natural buffers adjacent to these areas, limiting development and partnering land use with other compatible land and resource management uses such as conservation easements, parks and trails and some agricultural uses. The City of Corcoran has existing ordinances – in Sections 1050.020 and 1050.030 of the Zoning Ordinance – that limit development in floodplain areas and within a certain distance of waterbodies. The City will continue to enforce these regulations to protect these resources. RESILIENCE Resiliency is another way to describe a healthy community that can respond to inevitable changes. Our resilient design principles* include: 1. Diversity: Diversity of systems reduces the potential negative impact to the whole City of the failure of any one particular system. Increasing the diversity of systems means that we will want to maximize the diversity of different business types, institutions, sources of food, and industries, etc. 2. Redundancy: An increased redundancy of key infrastructure systems—including electrical power, fuel supply, waste water processing, food, and potable water supply - means that if one system is compromised, there is enough redundancy in the overall system to fill in for the compromised system until it can be replaced or repaired. 3. Modularity and Independence of System Components: Resilience capacity will be increased when system components have enough independence that damage or failure of one part or component of a system is designed to have a low probability of inducing failure of other similar or related components in the system. 4. Capacity for Adaptation: Resilience capacity will be increased by the relative adaptability of the various systems that comprise a City. City systems and infrastructure that are designed to quickly adapt to changing conditions and requirements will increase the overall resilience capacity of a City. The emergency management plan for the City will be evaluated to ensure capacity of the City system. 5. Environmental Responsiveness and Integration: The resilience capacity of a city is increased by how responsive and integrated its systems and functions are with its natural systems, services and resources. Environmental responsiveness and integration will not only reduce the cost of creating and maintaining technical infrastructure, but reduce the relative probability of infrastructure suffering significant negative impacts from events. *Adapted from ResilientCity.org 142 rural resilienCy Corcoran’s rural character is beloved by long-time residents and is identified as a draw for newer residents. Two surveys conducted in 2017 as part of the Comprehensive Plan update confirmed residents’ desire to preserve the rural character and land that is used for active agricultural production. At the same time, because of its’ close proximity to the Twin Cities (and associated land-use and economic pressures) the City continues a slow evolution from a rural agricultural landscape to a more developed suburban edge of the metropolitan area. In addition to production agriculture, rural services such as land management, water storage, nature management, alternative energy production, and rural-tourism can strengthen rural networks because they require natural resources and open space. The visual aesthetic of the City of Corcoran is also a powerful tool for preserving and communicating the rural character. Plant species diversity should be encouraged in open space, residential and commercial landscaping, and on privately or publicly owned land. The sum of individual efforts can create a powerful impact and heighten the sense of rural character. In addition to planting for diversity, planting pollinator-friendly landscapes will be important in Corcoran to provide critical habitat for the wildlife that contribute enormous value to landscape health and agricultural systems. The City of Corcoran has many tools and strategies already in place to protect its natural resources. Building rural resiliency will depend on the continued effort and support of these tools. An example of one of these tools is the Natural Resource Inventory that identified significant natural resource areas in the community and provided recommendations for the preservation and enhancement of these natural systems. Another is the Open Space and Preservation plat in Corcoran’s Subdivision Ordinance. Open Space and Preservation (OS&P) plats aim to preserve natural resources, natural habitat, and vegetated corridors. Incentives for land owners to protect these landscapes helps preserve natural landscapes and viable tracts of land for long-term agricultural use. agricultural PrEsErvEs The City of Corcoran encourages the continuation of agricultural use within the community. This policy expresses the City’s endorsement of the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves program. All land parcels in the Rural/ Ag Residential land use designation that meet the requirements for eligibility in the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves program according to Minnesota Statute §473H may apply to the City for enrollment. This policy is not intended to interfere with agricultural status of any lands prior to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. solar aCCess ProteCtion The Metropolitan Land Planning Act (MN Statute §473.859, Subd. 2) requires that local comprehensive plans include an element encouraging the protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The City of Corcoran will protect such access by requiring minimum standards for lot sizes, amounts of open space, yard setbacks, and maximum height of buildings for urban residents that create the opportunity for all building owners to develop solar energy facilities if desired. The City’s zoning or other regulations have been written to ensure that solar energy systems are an allowable component of any building construction in the City. In 2016 the City of Corcoran passed a solar ordinance amendment and approved 2 community solar gardens. The council has since modified the ordinance to prohibit new community solar gardens, but continues to allow solar energy production as an accessory use. As development continues to edge into Corcoran’s more rural settings, solar energy production may become a viable way to retain lower densities and open space, and create policy that incentivizes or allows this land use. Map 10-1: Solar Insolation (See page 143 for large size map.) Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co un t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blu e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake NO DATA 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Solar Insolation.mxdDate: 1/10/2019 Time: 3:38:16 PM User: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryParcel Boundaries 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLANMap 10-1Solar Insolation The analysis used to produce this dataset looks at geographic location, surface slope, surface aspect, and the effects ofshading based on local topography and adjacent structures. A digital surface model was generated from raw LiDAR data. Then,using this DSM, an individual locations on a grid surface were assessed for the amount of direct and indirect radiation thatreaches the surface. This analysis was conducted at a 1m resolution for the entire state of Minnesota. Source:Solar Insolation (University of Minnesota) taBle 10-1: gross and rooftoP solar resourCe CalCulations Gross Potential (Mwh/yr) Rooftop Potential (Mwh/yr) Gross Generation Potential (Mwh/yr) Rooftop Generation Potential (Mwh/yr) 73,540,645 511,720 7,354,064 51,172 Source: Metropolitan Council Local Planning Handbook 143 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake NO DATA 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Solar Insolation.mxd Date: 1/10/2019Time: 3:38:16 PMUser: ShuJC0243 Municipal BoundaryParcel Boundaries 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLANMap 10-1Solar Insolation The analysis used to produce this dataset looks at geographic location, surface slope, surface aspect, and the effects of shading based on local topography and adjacent structures. A digital surface model was generated from raw LiDAR data. Then, using this DSM, an individual locations on a grid surface were assessed for the amount of direct and indirect radiation that reaches the surface. This analysis was conducted at a 1m resolution for the entire state of Minnesota. Source:Solar Insolation (University of Minnesota) 144 145 CHAPTER 11: IMPLEMENTATION TaBles 11-1 lanD use 147 11-2 housing 147 11-3 eConoMiC CoMPeTiTiveness 147 11-4 Parks anD Trails 148 11-5 TransPorTaTion 148 11-6 wasTewaTer 148 11-7 surfaCe waTer 148 11-8 waTer suPPly 148 11-9 resilienCe 148 146 147 The Comprehensive Plan is a valuable tool to guide the development of land in the City as long as the visions, goals and policies called out in the Plan are implemented. The purpose of this Implementation chapter is to identify the specific strategies and action items that the City will undertake, over the course of several years, to ensure that the programs and policies established in the Plan are reflected in the decisions of the City. Official controls, such as land use and zoning regulations, subdivision regulations, and the zoning map, are required by State law to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. These controls represent the rules and regulations that govern City decisions related to growth and development. Most chapters of the Comprehensive Plan identify implementation items. Those chapter-specific items are the detailed policies and programs that are proposed to carry out the goals and objectives of the individual chapters. The purpose of this Implementation chapter is to consolidate, in a single chapter, the collected implementation statements identified throughout the Plan for ease of future reference. These action items will happen at different times throughout the City’s growth and are identified as follows: near-term (0-3 years), mid-term (4-7 years), long- term (8-10+ years), and ongoing (regular basis). Updates to these official controls are included in the following tables. IMPLEMENTATION taBle 11-1: land use No.Description Timing 1 Amend the official zoning map to be consistent with the land use designations of the 2040 Land Use Map. Near-term/ Ongoing 2 Prepare and adopt a Growth Management Policy consistent with the Metropolitan Council approved forecasts for sewered and unsewered growth. The plan will utilize a rolling average over five year increments so that a lower level of development can occur in some years and a higher level in other years, provided that the average annual residential permits does not exceed 230 units/year on average. If growth exceeds this rate, the City will coordinate with Metropolitan Council staff to discuss whether or not a forecast change or amendment is needed. Near-term 3 Review and update residential zoning districts and requirements and subdivision regulations as needed to ensure that the densities envisioned in the Plan can be achieved. Near-term/ Ongoing 4 Continue to review and update site and building design standards as needed to ensure high-quality residential, commercial, and industrial development in the community. Near-term/ Ongoing 5 Update Open Space and Preservation Plat Ordinance to support clustering, future connection to sewer, and increased level of natural resource protection with incentives consistent with the flexible residential guidelines and City goals. Near-term 6 Review and update zoning districts with associated uses and all site and design requirements.Near-term 7 Review and update the zoning and subdivision ordinances as needed to reduce impediments to affordable housing. Near-term 8 Encourage use of innovative development concepts where appropriate, such as mixed use development and cluster housing to provide life-cycle housing opportunities, minimize the need for automobiles, protect natural resources and maintain open space. Near-term/ Ongoing 9 Update the Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines as needed to reflect the policy changes in the current 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Near-term 10 Review and consider updates to ordinance standards that preserve rural character, including preservation of natural areas and agriculture, open spaces, and large lots with low density, especially in the non-MUSA area. Near-term taBle 11-2: housing No.Description Timing 1 Develop policy to allow the creative use of site planning or PUDs that provide flexibility for development containing affordable housing, such as a reduction in lot size, setbacks, street width floor area and parking requirements. Near-term/ Mid-term 2 Consider developing housing maintenance and rental housing licensing ordinances to maintain existing housing stock. Mid-term 3 Consider developing and promoting programs that encourage maintenance of existing housing, including neighborhood outreach programs, City beautification programs, City-wide clean-up programs, etc. Mid-term/ Long-term taBle 11-3: eConomiC ComPetitiveness No.Description Timing 1 Continue to participate in the I-94 Chamber of Commerce and explore other organizations which promote and attract local business. Near-term/ Ongoing 2 Support efforts to retain existing businesses and facilitate growth, including reviewing and updating zoning ordinances as appropriate and making business visits. Near-term/ Ongoing 3 Consider reactivating an Economic Development Authority. Near-term/ Mid-term 4 Complete Market Studies as needed. Ongoing 148 taBle 11-4: Parks and trails No.Description Timing 1 Park dedication fees will be reviewed annually to ensure the plan is implemented economically and effectively and updated as needed. Near-term/ Ongoing 2 The City will identify land acquisition and protection strategies to assemble the parks, trails, and open space system. Near-term/ Ongoing 3 Develop and routinely review and update standards for design and construction of public parks, trails and open space areas in the City. The City will apply best practices in mapping dedicated properties and researching and designing facilities. Near-term/ Ongoing 4 Develop a policy to establish priorities for use of park dedication funds to achieve its Parks and Trails goals. Near-term 5 Review and update as needed, the park and trail dedication requirements to ensure appropriate amount of dedication for developing parks and trails. Near-term/ Ongoing 6 Work cooperatively with other communities in Northwest Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, Minnesota DNR, local landowners and others to implement this plan and make the most of available resources. The City will actively seek grant funding for land acquisition. Near-term/ Ongoing taBle 11-5: transPortation No.Description Timing 1 Support the Brockton Interchange project and other mass transportation projects that will benefit Corcoran. Near-term/ Ongoing 2 Advocate for additional resources for transportation improvements Near-term/ Ongoing 3 Require public right of way dedication where deemed necessary on all newly platted lots, including right of way for future road and trail extensions for interconnectivity. Near-term/ Ongoing 4 Develop a Right of Way Maintenance Policy. Near-term 5 Continue to participate and monitor transportation activities by adjacent jurisdictions, Hennepin County, and the State. Near-term/ Ongoing 6 Develop and execute a plan to analyze, prioritize, and improve gravel roads in Corcoran. Near-term/ Ongoing taBle 11-6: WasteWater No.Description Timing 1 Develop a Wastewater Maintenance Plan.Near-term 2 Review and update ordinances as needed to be consistent with the City’s current ISTS responsibilities. Near-term/ Ongoing taBle 11-7: surfaCe Water No.Description Timing 1 Connect sanitary sewer at Maple Hill Estates to a regional treatment system. Near-term 2 Continue inspecting BMPs in accordance with the City’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Ongoing 3 Review and update wetland and shoreland ordinances as needed for consistency with watershed rules and other regulations. Near-term/ Ongoing 4 Apply the Commission’s strict development standards, to help improve water quality in Rush Creek and elsewhere. Near-term 5 Adopt a manure management ordinance. Near-term 6 Implement one or more recommendations from the Rush Creek Headwaters Sub-watershed Assessment. Near-term 7 Continue septic system education and work with Hennepin County on compliance. Near-term/ Ongoing 8 Explore a stormwater pond retrofit in the existing commercial/ industrial area located at County Road 116 and County Road 10. Near-term/ Mid-term 9 Work with the Commission and other cities on potential wetland improvements in Corcoran. Near-term/ Mid-term taBle 11-8: Water suPPly No.Description Timing 1 Implement notification system to inform customers when water availability conditions change. Near-term 2 Revise City ordinance/codes to allow water reuse options.Near-term 3 Conduct water conservation education and outreach. Near-term/ Mid-term taBle 11-9: resilienCe No.Description Timing 1 Limit development in floodplain and shoreland areas. Near-term 2 Continue to allow solar energy production as an accessory use. Near-term/ Ongoing 3 Review and develop policies that incentivize high quality stormwater management Near-term/ Mid- term 4 Develop policies and ordinances that encourage plant diversity and pollinator-friendly landscapes on private and public land as well as lawn maintenance and open space ordinances to ensure that pollinator friendly landscapes are not prohibited or overly restricted. Near-term/ Mid- term 5 Establish and enforce water quality standards Near-term/ Mid- term 6 Develop policies to encourage preservation of agricultural lands and activities in rural areas.Mid-term 149 150 151 APPENDICES aPPenDix a: ulTiMaTe wasTewaTer 153 sysTeM Design aPPenDix B: loCal surfaCe waTer 163 ManageMenT Plan aPPenDix C: loCal waTer suPPly Plan 245 aPPenDix D: CaPiTal iMProveMenT Plan 281 aPPenDix e: aDoPTeD zoning MaP 287 152 153 APPENDIX A: ULTIMATE WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESIGN 154 15 5 156 15 7 158 159 160 16 1 162 163 APPENDIX B: LOCAL SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 164 16 5 166 16 7 168 169 170 17 1 172 17 3 174 17 5 176 17 7 178 17 9 180 18 1 182 18 3 184 18 5 18 6 18 7 188 189 190 19 1 192 19 3 194 19 5 196 19 7 198 19 9 200 20 1 202 20 3 204 20 5 206 20 7 208 209 210 21 1 212 21 3 214 21 5 216 21 7 218 219 220 22 1 222 22 3 224 22 5 226 22 7 228 229 230 23 1 232 23 3 234 23 5 236 23 7 238 23 9 240 24 1 242 24 3 244 245 APPENDIX C: LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN 246 24 7 248 249 250 25 1 252 25 3 254 25 5 256 25 7 258 259 260 26 1 262 26 3 264 26 5 266 26 7 268 269 270 27 1 272 27 3 274 27 5 276 27 7 278 279 280 281 APPENDIX D: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 282 28 3 284 28 5 286 287 APPENDIX E: ADOPTED ZONING MAP 288 289 !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!! î î î s s òñð òñð ñ ñ ï ï î î s ñ ï ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STI E G R D WI L L O W D R I V E HACKAMORE ROAD TR A I L H A V E N R O A D CA I N R O A D OAKDALE DR STREHLER ROAD PIO N E E R T R COUNTY ROAD 117 RO L L L I N G H I L L S R D LARKIN RD CI T Y O F G R E E N F I E L D CI T Y O F M A P L E G R O V E SCOTT LAKE BE C H T O L D R O A D $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUS H C R E E K Official Zoning Map 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Zoning Districts: UR Urban Reserve RR Rural Residential RSF-1 Single Family Residential 1 RSF-2 Single Family Residential 2 RSF-3 Single and Two Family Residential 3 RMF-1 Medium Density Residential RMF-2 Mixed Residential RMF-3 High Density Residential MP Manufactured Home Park P-I Public / Institutional TCR Transitional Rural Commercial CR Rural Commercial C-1 Neighborhood Commercial C-2 Community Commercial DMU Downtown Mixed Use GMU General Mixed Use BP Business District I-1 Light Industrial PUD Planned Unit Development ï Cemetery î ChurchsGolf Course ñ Government Building òñð Public Park ! !! !! 2030 Metropolitan Urban Service Area City Limit Open Water Shoreland Overlay District Updated November 2018 Adopted June 2011 19 10 30 116 101 50 19 10 ± STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 8c. Council Meeting: February 28, 2019 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Preliminary Plat Extension Request - Sawgrass Action Required: Approval Summary: On December 11, 2014 the City Council approved a preliminary plat for a development known as Sawgrass. The proposed development was for 246 single family homes on approximately 103 acres on 20400 County Road 10. Extensions were approved on February 23, 2017 and January 25, 2018 with a current expiration date of February 28, 2019. The City has received a request to again extend the plat. The City Council should act on that request, either to deny or approve and extend the plat. Attached to this document is the request and a portion of the items related to the approvals. It is requested that the Council consider the request to further extend the approval. More documents are available at City Hall if you are interested. Prior to a development taking place a final plat would need to be approved along with a development agreement. Financial/Budget: If the development moves forward a formal development agreement would be created outlining responsibilities and cost for the City and developer. Options: 1. Extend the preliminary plat for Sawgrass for one year until February 29, 2019. 2. Take no action and let the preliminary plat for sawgrass expire after February 28, 2018. Recommendation: If the City Council believes the preliminary plat as approved is in the best interest of the community the Council should approve the extension. If the City Council believes a different type of development would be in the best interest of the community the Council should deny the extension. Council Action: Consider a motion extend the preliminary plat for Sawgrass for one year until February 29, 2019. Page 2 Attachments: 1. Preliminary Plat Extension Request 2. Staff report for December 11, 2014 City Council meeting 3. Resolution 2014-72 4. Resolution 2014-73 5. Ordinance 2014-290 6. Resolution 2014-74 7. Preliminary Plat of Sawgrass January 22, 2019 Brad Martens City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 RE: Prelim Plat Extension Sawgrass Brad - This letter is a request by the property owner (Corcoran Bay Holdings) to extend the Sawgrass preliminary plat approvals for an additional year. Please place this on the City Council Agenda. Any questions on this please let me know. Sincerely, Greg Hayes Vice President – Real Estate / Development Cc: Greg Ebert Jim Rasmussen 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: December 5, 2014 for the December 11, 2014 City Council Meeting RE: Preliminary PUD Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for “Sawgrass” for Peachtree Partners, LLC on the 103-acre Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (PID 23-119-23-42-0003) (City File 14- 027) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:December 16, 2014 1.Application Request Peachtree Partners, LLC. has submitted a request for approval of Preliminary PUD Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to PUD to allow 246 single family detached homes on 103.32 acres. *NOTE: Staff has attached the most relevant files to this packet; however, due to the size of the project not all files could be attached. The full set of plans and application materials is available at City Hall for inspection during regular business hours. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their December 4th meeting. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval. In addition to the applicant, 3 residents spoke at the public hearing. There were a number of questions about drainage, the future extension of infrastructure and comments about the proposed amendments to the draft approvals from the developer. The Planning Commission reviewed proposed approval modifications from the developer and made modifications to the draft resolutions. The attached resolutions and ordinances reflect that discussion. The following were significant issues that were discussed: a.The approvals require dedication of trails within an easement. The applicant would like to provide the trails in outlots. This is not consistent with City policy and ordinance and the Commission did recommend dedication of easements. b.Hennepin County submitted a letter requesting a 60-foot ½ right-of-way be dedicated as part of this plat. The applicant was showing a 40-foot ½ right-of-way. Hennepin County staff has Agenda Item: Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. verbally agreed to a 50-foot ½ right-of-way. The Commission was concerned as this has a significant impact on the development. They deferred this issue to the City Council. c. There was significant discussion regarding the architectural standards in the zoning ordinance. The commission felt strongly that the developer did not need to match the front elevation on the side and rear elevation but that variety in materials and colors must be provided on those elevations when the lots are adjacent to the park. The language in the approving resolution was modified to better address this issue. d. There was significant discussion about lighting for signs. Staff recommended that down lighting not be allowed for the proposed signs as it is prohibited by the ordinance, but the Planning Commission recommended approval as requested by the developer. e. The PUD flexibility standards requested by the developer were discussed at length, ultimately, the Commission recommended approval. The most significant policy issues for the City Council to address are: a. The amount of right-of-way to be dedicated for County Road 10 b. Whether to accept trail outlots as proposed by the developer or easements as recommended by staff. c. Whether or not to accept the PUD flexibility standards. 3. Parks and Trails Commission Review The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed this item at their November 18th meeting. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend the following: • Acceptance of the off road trails in 20-foot easements as shown (totaling 2.88 acres). • The remainder of the park dedication shall be cash in lieu of land. • The developer shall pave the entrance trail shown between County Road 10 and the large wetland area (Outlot N). • Recommended approval of the proposed trails in the wetland buffers as shown. • Recommended that the developer donate a trail easement on the west side of the project adjacent to the creek. No improvements are required in this easement and no park dedication credit will be provided. • The park dedication for the trail easements shall be deeded with each phase of development. • Cash for park dedication shall be paid in full by phase II. Additionally, the Commission recommended that the City and County work to ensure a safe trail crossing on County Road 10 between the project and the existing City park as part of the planned CR 10 improvements. 4. Context Zoning and Land Use The property is currently guided Low Density Residential and zoned RMF-3 (High Density Residential) and UR (Urban Reserve). The Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reclassify the Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 2 December 11, 2014 property from High to Low Density was approved and now the City will be required to rezone to a district compatible with this land use classification. Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties to the west are guided Low Density Residential and Mixed Residential and zoned UR. The properties to the north are guided Mixed Residential and High Density Residential and zoned UR. The properties to the east are guided Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-Public and are zoned UR and P-I (Public Institutional). The four parcels to the south (and north of County Road 10) are guided Commercial and zoned C-1 (neighborhood commercial). The property to the south across County Road 10 is guided Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi- Public and zoned P-I and UR. Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a number of wetlands scattered around the site. The wetland delineation was approved by Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission on January 3, 2014. A High Quality Natural Community is located in the north (Maple Basswood Forest) and east (Floodplain Forest) areas of the site. Rush Creek and an unnamed tributary are adjacent to or within the site; consequently, a portion of the site is in the shoreland overlay district. A portion of the site is also located in the floodplain. Process A PUD sketch plan was submitted for review and comment by the City in the summer of 2014. Generally those comments were incorporated in the plans now being requested for review. An EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet) has been completed and the City Council adopted a determination of No Need for EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) on November 13, 2014. If the requested preliminary applications are approved, the applicant would submit a final PUD development plan and final plat. The applicant has indicated that this will occur in phases. If the final plat and final plan are consistent with the approved preliminary plans, the City must approve the final plat and final plan. A development agreement would be processed for City Council approval with the final plat for each phase. Unless otherwise approved by the City Council, the initial final plat must be submitted within one year of preliminary plat approval, however, subsequent phases would be over an approximately 5 year period. 5. Analysis of Request Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. The applicant provided an extraordinarily detailed narrative with this application and this report will highlight key issues for consideration and review. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 3 December 11, 2014 A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City must deny the rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving PUDs. A PUD must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community and surrounding area. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Rezoning The proposed project is located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) of the City. This is the area planned to be serviced by sanitary sewer and municipal water and these services will be extended by the developer as part of the project. The subject property is zoned Urban Reserve (UR) and RMF-3 (High Density Residential). These land uses were anticipating higher density development consistent with the prior High Density Land Use designation. A comprehensive plan amendment was approved to reclassify this property as Low Density Residential and the zoning must be revised to comply with this new land use designation. The applicant is requesting a rezoning from Urban Reserve (UR) and RMF-3 (High Density Residential) to PUD (planned unit development). The Zoning Ordinance has established a PUD zoning district and the purpose of the PUD district, is to promote creative and efficient use of land by providing design flexibility in the development of residential neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas that would not be possible under a conventional zoning district. In this case, the developer is requesting PUD flexibility primarily for lot size and setbacks. The City must review this request for compliance with the PUD standards as follows: 1. The planned development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The planned unit development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed density of 3.5 units per acre is within the 3-5 units per acre expected in the Low Density Residential land use classification and the plan incorporates the trail, park and street connections anticipated within the site. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 4 December 11, 2014 2. The planned development is not in conflict with the intent of the underlying zoning district. The planned development of 246 single family homes is consistent with the intent of the underlying RSF-3 zoning district, which allows a mix of single and two-family homes. The applicant is requesting approval of PUD zoning for design flexibility to provide a mix of lot sizes for this neighborhood at a density consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The planned development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer will provide both internal infrastructure needed to support their development and trunk infrastructure improvements that will serve a larger development area and well as increased amenities and better neighborhood design than might be expected in a standard subdivision. 4. The planned development or unit thereof is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and/or operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other subsequent unit or phase. The planned development is feasible without dependence upon any other subsequent phase. The project has a 3-5 year phasing plan and development is contingent upon completion of trunk infrastructure improvements. The initial phase will include the construction of the primary project infrastructure, lift station and other key public infrastructure improvement. 5. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing public trails consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and a strong pedestrian connection to the existing City park. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve this site at the developer’s expense. 6. The planned development will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. The planned development is a residential neighborhood developed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore, will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. 7. The quality of the building and site design proposed by the PUD plan shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, shall demonstrate higher standards, more efficient and effective uses of streets, utilities and public facilities, it shall maintain and enhance any Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 5 December 11, 2014 natural resources within the development, and create a public benefit that is greater than what would be achieved through the strict application of the primary zoning regulations The quality of the site design proposed by the PUD shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, install and provide more efficient use of streets, utilities and public facilities than may otherwise be expected and create public benefit that is greater than would otherwise be achieved due to the construction and financing of all related infrastructure improvements. The development will meet the City’s density goals while preserving 38% of the site as open space maintained by the homeowner’s association (much of it wetland and ponding areas, but wooded areas and public trails as well) and replanting 1,620 new trees. The applicant has not yet determined the builder(s) for the project, but has agreed to generally comply with the City’s architectural design standards. The Zoning Ordinance states that “the rezoning of the property defined in the development plan shall not become effective until such time as the City Council approves an ordinance reflecting said amendment, which shall take place at the time that the City Council approves the final development plan.” The Council should approve the rezoning to be effect at such time as the final PUD development plan is adopted. Preliminary PUD Development Plan The PUD offers enhanced flexibility to develop the site through the relaxation of most typical zoning district standards. The PUD allows for a greater variety of land uses, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this flexibility, the City expects a higher level of design and a more sensitive development than might normally be the case. The proposal includes 226 single family homes, 20 twinhomes and several common lots/outlots. The common areas would be maintained by the HOA. The 3 different single family lot sizes and planned association maintained housing (twinhomes) in the southeast corner of the site would be part of a master HOA that would be responsible for maintenance of the cul de sac and park parkway landscaping, entrance signage, common open space areas and similar features. Lot Size The Zoning Ordinance states that the purpose of the RSF-3 district is “… to be the primary single- family zoning district for future residential developments. The smaller lot area will make efficient use of the City’s land supply and investment in public utilities and allow the City to efficiently protect and preserve its natural resources such as wetlands and woodlands. In addition, the smaller lot area will help the City meet its density goal for new single-family homes. Single family homes, as well as two- family dwellings are allowed in this district.” The RSF-3 district requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet and a minimum lot width of 65 feet. The plan shows single family residential lots in three sizes: 55-foot wide lots, 65-foot wide lots and 75-foot lots. Lot areas range from 6,555 square feet to 20,182 square feet. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 6 December 11, 2014 The PUD zoning allows flexibility from the standard lot sizes and the applicant has requested PUD flexibility to reduce the minimum lot sizes. While the lot sizes are less than the ordinance allows, the resulting density remains at the low end of the 3-5 units per acre that the Comprehensive Plan anticipates. Setbacks The plan shows some variety from the standard setback requirements as follows: RSF-3 Ordinance Standard Requested PUD Flexibility Single Family Two-Family dwellings Single Family Detached Villas Minimum Lot Area 7,500 square feet 15,000 square feet 5,000 sq. ft. (for flexibility--the smallest lot shown is 6,555) 4,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot width 65 feet 100 feet 55’ 40’ Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks Front, From all other 20 feet 25 feet 20 feet 20 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square 15 feet N/A 15 feeta 15 feeta Deck (side and rear) 10 feet 10 feet Side (living) 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet 5 feet Side (garage)** 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Rear 30 feet 25 feet 25 feet 20 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet Driveway setback 5 feet 5 feet 2 feetb 2 feetb **Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 feet. a – Porches may be allowed to encroach and same on either front set-back on corner lots. b – Allowed within set-back with ACC and City approval. The ordinance requires a 15-foot minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels. The applicant has requested PUD flexibility to reduce this separation to 10 feet. Staff notes that this is a fairly common separation in other communities. However, in order to ensure that the 5-foot wide drainage and utility easement remains clear on each side of the house, we have included a condition that no accessory structures or equipment (such as air conditioning units, fireplace, etc.) be allowed to encroach into this 5-foot setback. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 7 December 11, 2014 The applicant is marketing the southeast corner of the site for an association maintained product and is requesting flexibility from the ordinance standards as follows: RMF-1 Twinhome Sawgrass PUD Twinhome RMF-1 Townhome Sawgrass PUD Townhome Min. Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. 7,500 sq. ft. per unit 4,000 per unit 5,400 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. per unit Min. Lot Width at Front Set-Back 150 feet 75 feet per unit 60 feet 30 feet per unit Min. Side Set- Back 0 feet 10 feetd 10 feetd 10 feetc Min. Front Yard Set-Back 25 feet 20 feet 25 feet 20 feetc Min. Rear Yard Set-Back 25 feet 20 feet 25 feet 15 feet Porches 10 feeta 10 feeta Decks 10 feetb 0 feet Shared Driveway Allowed Allowed a – Porches may be allowed to encroach and same on either front set-back on corner lots. b – Allowed within set-back with ACC and City approval. c – From ROW or private drive d – Between Structures Staff does not support shared drives for single family homes, but does support them for twinhomes and townhomes as part of a good site plan. We will review details at the time of final plan approval. While the Zoning Ordinance allows a reduced front yard setback, it does so with the understanding that the garages will be setback from the front home elevation, thereby allowing adequate driveway space. Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that the driveway be at least 22 feet in length between the front of the garage and the street, roadway or sidewalk; and “not impede pedestrian or traffic circulation or access to any other dwelling unit, nor shall it adversely affect the ability to provide public utilities or public safety.” The final PUD development plan must clearly show compliance with these requirements. Staff recommends that driveways for single family homes comply with the 5-foot side yard setback to ensure that driveways remain outside of the City’s drainage and utility easements. Design Requirements When the current Zoning Ordinance was adopted in 2011, it included a new section on Design Requirements for each zoning district. The RSF-3 district is subject to these standards. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility from several of these standards, as noted below. A. Front Elevation: 1. Each elevation facing a street or park shall have a minimum of 50% comprised on (sic) natural material consisting of brick, stone, stucco, hardi-board, redwood, cedar or other similar materials. A minimum of two different materials is required, except that brick may be used on the entire elevation. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 8 December 11, 2014 2. Design of street and park fronting exterior elevations shall be varied with a minimum of five different styles provided in the development. 3. Homes in proximity to each other shall not look alike in terms of the combination of color of siding, accent and roofing materials. The home under consideration will be compared to the two homes on each side and to the three homes directly facing it. The applicant has indicated that they will comply with all of these requirements. Since the applicant does not have a builder for the project, it is not clear how the applicant intends to meet this requirement on those elevations, but compliance will be reviewed with building permit. The City has noted with previous developments that LP siding can be used to meet the front elevation requirements. The intent of this section appears to be to provide some variety in the number and quality of the materials used on the front elevation. The applicant would like to clarify that these requirements do not preclude two homes from using the same color and type of roofing products adjacent to one another, but it does ensure that the combination of colors for roofing, siding, trim, etc. are not exactly the same neighbor to neighbor. We agree and find that the limited options for roofing materials and colors make matching materials adjacent to each other acceptable provided the elevation and other material types and colors are not the same as the adjacent single family home. In the twinhome/townhome development in the southeast corner, the applicant has asked for some flexibility from these standards. The applicant notes that it is very common and often desired to have twinhomes with a more consistent appearance and they are requesting an exemption from these provisions for twinhomes. We agree that more consistency between these types of units may be desirable, but staff believes that some variety between these units is still possible and desirable. B. Garages: 1. The garage shall not comprise more than 55 percent of the viewable ground floor street- facing linear building frontage. This standard is based on the measurement of the entire garage structure and not on a measurement of the garage door or doors only. Corner lots are 2. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior design of the home. The applicant has requested PUD flexibility from requirement that garages not comprise more than 60% of the front of the single family home and not more than 70% of the twinhome/townhome units. Staff finds that the small lots, combined with consumer demand for large garages makes compliance more difficult. The applicant will comply with the other design criteria designed to de-emphasize the garage and bring the garage into the home. The garage doors shall be architecturally styled to match the exterior design of the home. Staff recommends approval of this flexibility. C. Roof: 1. Architectural design roofing materials including asphalt shingles, wood shingles (including shake), concrete, clay, ceramic tile roofs or residential steel roofing material (with hidden fasteners) are required on all roofs. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 9 December 11, 2014 2. Overhangs must be a minimum of 12 inches. Peachtree Partners, LLC. has committed to complying with these requirements. D. Side and Rear Facades: 1. Equal architectural treatment on all sides of the building (materials, articulation, etc.) shall be used for all new residential construction when located on or visible from an arterial road way or public park. Accenting shall be accomplished by including accenting materials and design on all facades. 2. Each side elevation shall have at least one window or door opening. 3. A maximum of 18 inches of the foundation wall may be exposed on any elevation. Staff believes that the intent of D.1. is to ensure that the higher quality and variety of materials on the front of the home be extended to the side and rear of the home when located on or visible from an arterial road or public park. This development has several homes that will be visible from the public park (across CR 10). The backs of these homes will be very visible from the park and should be subject to a higher level of design. The applicant believes that the ordinance language simply means that side and rear elevations must be consistent with each other, but is not required to incorporate materials and design elements from the front elevation. Furthermore, they believe that the proposed berm along CR 10 will adequately screen the rear of the home. • The Planning Commission found that regardless of the berm and landscaping proposed, the homes that are visible from a public park must have upgraded side and rear elevations as required by ordinance. Homeowners Association The development will have a homeowners association (HOA) to maintain the common elements, including the open space areas, development signage and cul de sac/island plantings. Additionally, the association maintained homes planned for the southeast corner of the site would likely have a sub-association to provide full maintenance of the home exterior, including mowing and plowing. A draft of the HOA documents has been submitted. A final draft of the HOA documents shall be submitted for City review and approval with the final PUD development plan application for phase I. Parking Guest parking is not required for single family homes. Section 1060.060 of the ordinance requires a single stall garage for single family homes. The proposed homes would have a minimum of a two- car garage. This complies with ordinance requirements. However, if multi-family housing is ultimately proposed in the southeast portion of the site, some guest parking may be required. We will review this issue when a PUD final plan is submitted for that portion of the site. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 10 December 11, 2014 The local streets within the subdivision are 28 feet wide streets within a 50-foot right-of-way. This is adequate to accommodate on-street parking on one side. This is consistent with the City’s engineering design standards and should be adequate to provide guest parking in the other neighborhoods. The developer should provide a parking plan for on-street and off-street parking throughout the development. At the time of building permit submittal, the developer should also provide a graphic to confirm that the driveways in front of the homes have a minimum driveway length of 22-feet to accommodate parking in front of the garages. The City requires all streets to be public. The developer has requested the flexibility to allow private streets in the association maintained housing area. Staff recommends that a public street be provided for the proposed twinhome development. However, private drives are very common in townhome developments and staff recommends that the issue be discussed in more detail with the final plan for that area. Staff finds that private streets can be acceptable if appropriate design standards and maintain agreements are developed. No direct driveway access and no parking will be permitted on County Road 10. Landscaping The City has no tree preservation requirements. The City does encourage preservation of significant trees particularly those shown on the natural resource inventory. The applicant has completed a tree survey of the more than 8,000 significant trees on site. The current development proposal preserves 44.6% of the significant trees. Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance requires 1 overstory tree for each single family home and a variety of landscaping along the perimeter of the site, along the streets, within the private park and adjacent to wetlands. The applicant is proposing to plant more than 1,600 new trees in this development. Each new home will be required to plant a minimum of 3 trees on their property and the developer will be installing street trees and trees in the open space areas. The plan shows overstory trees along each of the public streets and additional plantings at the project entries off County Road 10. This is generally consistent with the ordinance requirements; however, the developer should provide more detail about the landscaping plan, including the cul de sac island plantings. Staff recommends that the developer provide a revised landscaping plan that identifies the number, location, species and plant size to ensure compliance with the ordinance. Additionally, care should be given to provide a variety of trees species to ensure protection against disease and insects. This detailed plan must be submitted for City review and approval as part of the final PUD development plan. Signage Chapter 84 of the City Code regulates signage. Residential developments are allowed two development signs at the main entrance, not to exceed 32 square feet in area or 6 feet in height. One sign not to exceed 16 square feet may be allowed at a secondary entrance. PUD flexibility is requested to exceed these signage limits as described in the applicant’s narrative. The preliminary PUD development plans show 2 monument signs at the main entrance on County Road 10 plus a median monument and 1 sign at the western entrance off County Road 10. The sign plans show an Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 11 December 11, 2014 18 square foot sign on a larger base with decorative elements for the main entry monuments and a median monument with approximately 10 square feet of sign area. A sign detail has been provided as an example, but no specific details have been provided. The developer has requested approval of the following PUD flexibility, which reflects more and large signs than shown on the submitted Preliminary Sign Plan exhibit (staff’s recommendation is after each item): • Up to three signs allowed at each entrance. One on each side and one in the median as applicable. • Agreed • Sign area is measured by drawing a box around the lettering and shall not exceed 80 sq. ft. per entrance. Individual signs may not exceed 40 sq. ft. • Total signage at the main entrance shall not exceed 80 sq. ft. Individual monument signs shall not exceed 40 sq. ft. • Total signage at the second entrance shall not exceed 40 sq. ft. Individual monument signs shall not exceed 20 square feet. • Signs may be located adjacent to the right of way (ROW) and in the case of signs in the median signs may be located in the ROW. • Median signs may be located in the right-of-way, provided the applicant provides an exhibit showing that sight visibility is maintained. • Monument signs must comply with the minimum 10-foot setback and be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. • Uplighting that does not glare onto adjacent property will be allowed. Illuminated and/or backlit lettering will be allowed. • The ordinance requires that any illumination of such signs must be external with downward focused lighting on a timer. While we believe our sign ordinance standards are very restrictive, we believe that prohibiting uplighting is a valid restriction as such lighting can be distracting to motorists and residents. Staff supports the illuminated and/or backlit lettering requested and the downward focused lighting. Lighting must comply with the standards in Section 1060.040 and glare, whether direct or reflected, shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. • Signs and related structures will be allowed up to 12’ in height. • Monument signs shall not exceed 8 feet in height, however, median monuments may be allowed up to 11 feet tall. Additionally, the Parks and Trails Commission indicated a desire for trailhead signage that would be provided generally where the trails cross public streets. These provide good wayfinding through the neighborhood, but the developer must work with City staff to ensure that the trail signage is consistent with City standards. Staff recommends that the developer submit a master signage plan with sign details for design review by the Planning Commission and City Council prior to approval of the final PUD development plan. Utilities Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 12 December 11, 2014 Municipal sewer and water are not currently available to the site and would need to be extended to service the property prior issuance of building permits. The City Engineer has completed a feasibility study to show how sanitary sewer and municipal water could be extended to the site. The City of Corcoran has indicated that the cost to extend municipal utilities to a property should be borne by the property developer. At this time those final costs are unknown, but staff has developed an estimate of those costs with a feasibility study. All improvements within the site will be completed by the developer. All off-site improvements will be completed by the City and financed by the developer. City policy also requires the developer to extend sanitary sewer and water stubs to the property boundaries to allow future extension to surrounding properties. These surrounding properties would not be required to hook up to sewer and water at this time, but it is common practice for the developer to extend utilities to the property line to allow for future extensions. The cost to extend the utilities to the property line would be borne by the developer. Wetlands The developer completed a MNRAM for the wetlands on site and the City engineer has confirmed that they are a mix of medium and high quality wetlands. Many of these wetlands have been impacted by farming over the years, but retain their higher rankings due to their proximity to the creek. Wetland mitigation is proposed and is subject to review and approval from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. The ECW MC is the LGU for the Wetland Conservation Act. All wetlands and buffers must be blanketed by a drainage and utility easement. The applicant has requested PUD flexibility to allow alternative wetland buffers and setbacks in compliance with Section 1050.010, Subd. 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. The ordinance allows the City to approve these alternative buffers when “because of the unique physical characteristics of a specific parcel of land, narrower buffer strips may be necessary to allow for a reasonable use of land”. In this case, staff finds that the alternative wetland buffers are appropriate because the wetland are generally located in the open space corridor, which would serve a similar function to a wetland buffer. However, in exchange for this flexibility, the City does require the developer to provide extraordinary management practices, as outlined in the City Zoning Ordinance. The plans note that an average buffer of 25 feet is proposed, but the actual buffers must be dimensioned on the plans. The plans appear to be generally consistent with the buffer requirements. The plans must also identify the location of the wetland buffer monument signs in compliance with the ordinance. Wetland Impacts The plan shows a number of trails located within the wetland buffer. Although the ordinance does allow trails in the wetland buffer setback area, it is silent on the concept of trails in the buffer itself. The applicant notes that due to the location of wetlands and the size of the buffers, the impact to the Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 13 December 11, 2014 buffers could not be avoided. To offset the impacts created by the trail being located in the buffer, the applicant increased the amount of buffer area in an amount equal to the impact. As noted by the developer, this ultimately allows the trail to be located in the open space away from homes and provides for a great trail experience. • Given that the buffers are primarily located in the common areas, the developer has requested some trails within the buffer areas. The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed this request and recommends approval of this flexibility. Floodplain There are approximately 3 acres of floodplain on the property. There are no impacts to the 100 year floodplain and the floodplain does not impact any home sites. The proposed ponds are located outside the floodplain. The portion of the trail meanders in and out of the 500 year flood plain will be elevated above the flood elevation. Shoreland The western portion of the property includes land in the Shoreland Overly District. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility from the Shoreland Overlay District due to the unique characteristics of the property. The shoreland overlay district is for the creek that meanders through the site. The applicant’s narrative does an excellent job of outlining the issues, request and mitigating factors: • Impervious Surface. The developer has done an excellent job of retaining open space next to the portion of the creek that is on the subject property. This open space will mitigate any impacts from the planned homes. Staff recommends approval of the PUD flexibility to allow more than 25% impervious surface coverage per lot in this area based on the finding that the total impervious surface coverage in this area will not exceed 25%. There is another portion of the site that is in the shoreland overly district for the creek that is located on the other side of County Road 10. Because all of this property is separated from the creek by County Road 10 and all drainage will flow north away from the creek, staff supports the PUD flexibility to waive the shoreland requirements for this area as well. • Building Height. The shoreland overlay district restricts building height to 25 feet, but we support the staff request to allow 35-foot building heights as allowed in areas outside the shoreland district. None of the homes are riparian lots and this is not a navigable waterway, so the impact would be negligible. • Lot Width. The ordinance requires a 75-foot minimum lot width. The applicant is requesting lots as small as 55 feet wide. Staff supports this request because the planned development will preserve approximately 40 acres (38% of the site) as permanent open space and has included stormwater management techniques within the development to ensure protection of the shoreland areas. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 14 December 11, 2014 • Setback. The ordinance requires a 50-foot setback from County Roads. The lots would be separated from the County road by an outlot so this condition would not apply. We support the setbacks approved as part of the PUD. Storm Water Management The proposed plan identifies a number of ponds throughout the site. The ponding must provide treatment and rate control. The developer may not increase the rate of runoff onto other properties and existing drainage through the site must be maintained. The developer’s plan is generally in compliance with these regulations. The City and the watershed will both review the grading plans for compliance with the applicable regulations. The ponds will need to be blanketed by drainage and utility easements. The developer has provided 10-foot drainage and utility easements along the front and rear lot lines and 5-foot drainage and utility easements along the side lot lines for the single family lots. This is consistent with the engineering design standards. Off Site Storm water Management The developer and the City are working with the adjacent property owners to the north to address the existing off-site drainage issues as part of this development. The area to the north has a significant floodplain and the floodplain will not be altered due to impacts of the project. Historical City storm water maps had shown a northwest ditch route for the site’s easterly wetland. The 1971 aerial photo is given in Attachment C, however current topography shows this route is no longer feasible. The changes to the landscape from houses / tree canopy / farming practices over the last 40 years has created a situation where a northerly flow path is more dominant in the current condition. To mitigate the impact of more volume of runoff, the City has been in contact with the residents to the north who have expressed a willingness to participate in a solution so the development’s outlet of the large Sawgrass wetland does not exacerbate existing conditions. Therefore, the City will work with the residents and developer to implement a conveyance solution. Elm Creek Watershed will be reviewing plans and as the LGU also should issue wetland permits that will be pursued under a “No Loss”. Financing will be at the developer’s expense, and implementing an offsite solution assumes the northerly landowners continue to cooperate. The City Engineer’s memo includes more detail and compliance with recommendations in that memo is a condition of approval. Streets A traffic study was completed by the City as part of the feasibility study and is discussed in the City Engineer’s report. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 15 December 11, 2014 The City is working with Hennepin County to realign the CR10/CR 50 intersection near this site. The developer will be responsible for a share of these improvements. The remainder of the local streets within the development are shown with tree-lined boulevards and landscaped islands in the cul de sacs. These local streets are 28 feet wide and located in 50-foot rights-of-way, which are generally consistent with the City Engineering Design Standards. The landscaped islands provide an attractive amenity for the development, reduce impervious surface coverage and can provide opportunities for snow storage. The developer should provide more detailed information about the proposed landscaping within the islands. As noted with the Ravinia subdivision, staff believes that the landscaping islands are an amenity and could become a standard for the City, but should be monitored as the City takes over responsibility for snowplowing these public streets in the future. Hennepin County transportation has received a copy of the proposed plat and has indicated that they will provide comments, but the City has not yet received these comments. We expect to be able to provide an update at the City Council meeting, but the engineer’s memo includes several items that we expect the County to require based on conversations with staff. Typically, the County has required additional right-of-way along County Road 10 and we expect this to be a condition of approval. The narrative notes that a 40-foot ½ right-of-way is proposed to be dedicated, but it must be clearly dimensioned on the preliminary plat and plans. Access As noted in the previous section, the main access to the site would be from County Road 10 near the center of the site, with a secondary access off County Road 10 near the western border of the site. Additionally, the applicant has provided street stubs to the Gleason property this property surrounds, as well as stubs to the north and east as required. The road in the northeast portion of the site will be used to access the lift station and an easement to provide the sewer connection to CR 116 may also be graded and graveled to provide an emergency vehicle access; however, final design will occur with easement negotiations. Lighting Decorative streetlights are proposed throughout the development and generally appear to comply with the City policies. The streetlights would need to comply with the requirements of Section 1040.040 of the Zoning Ordinance and the Engineering Design Standards. The developer must work with the City to develop standards and revise the plans as needed to provide street lighting. Parks, Trails and Open Space Under the current ordinance, park dedication is required at 11% of the net pre-development area or 11% of the appraised value of the land for developments like this with between 3-5 units per acre. The City should generally accept park dedication in the form of land where shown on the maps; however, the City may choose to accept cash or a combination of cash and land. The City may Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 16 December 11, 2014 accept cash-in-lieu of land at 11% of the value of the land with a maximum rate of $4,000 per unit for each new unit located inside of the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area). The applicant has provided an appraisal report that shows the land value at $2,893,000. In this case, the plat shows 90.45 pre-development net acres, which would require: • Park dedication of 9.95 net acres (90.45 x 11%); • Cash in lieu of land of $318,230 ($2,893,000 x 11%); or • Some combination of land and cash. The applicant is showing a series of sidewalks and trails throughout the site. The Comprehensive Plan includes the 2030 Parks & Trails Plan shows an off-road trail on the north side of the site winding through the site and connecting to the existing City park. The plan is generally consistent with these trail locations. The applicant has done a good job of preserving the natural areas shown on the Comprehensive Plan as open space and 38% of the site (approximately 40 acres) is preserved as permanent open space. The plans show 1.3 miles of trail and 2.0 miles of sidewalk within this development. The trail locations shown on the plans are generally consistent with the adopted parks plans. However, the trail connection two County Road 10 is shifted east from the adopted plan to the project entrance. From a safety standpoint, this makes sense. However, staff notes that the new trail connection is next to a street rather than in an off-road location. The current location of the trail connection to County Road 10 is a trail in lieu of a sidewalk. • The Parks and Trails Commission recommended that this segment of trail be dedicated to the City and that park dedication credit be given, but that the developer is responsible for paving this segment of trail without reimbursement. • The Parks and Trails Commission also recommended that the future shown on the west side of the project be deed as a trail easement, but that no park dedication credit is granted and no improvements made because the final alignment of the trail may change as surrounding properties develop. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 17 December 11, 2014 Park dedication shall only be granted for trail easement areas as shown on the Comprehensive Plan and will not be given for trails located within public right-of-way. The developer is required to provide finished grading and ground cover for all park, playground, trail and public open spaces within their developments. No credit toward the required dedication shall be given for this work. • The trail locations are generally consistent with the locations shown on the Comprehensive Plan, but the Commission should review and comment. • If credit is given for the 20-foot trail easement over all trails as shown by the developer, that would be 2.88 acres or 28.97% (2.88/9.95) of the required park dedication for this project (2.93 acres would actually be dedicated, but as noted above, no credit will be given for the western portion). • Park dedication due on this site would be $318,230 if all in cash. However, if credit is given for the trails, the area of the trails would satisfy 28.97% of the park dedication requirement, leaving 71.03% of the dedication due in land or approximately $226,039. • The Parks and Trails Commission recommended that the full park dedication amount be paid with the 2nd phase of development. • Staff recommends that the City work with the developer to schedule the park dedication payments and timing of the credit to be given for paving the trails. The reimbursement amount could be approximately $95,355 (based on $15/lf paving costs described by the developer in the narrative), which would result in a net contribution of approximately $130,684 (the developer has a slightly different number in his narrative and the actual number would be finalized with the final plat). The Parks & Trails Plan also shows an on-road trail on County Road 10. The City is currently working with Hennepin County on the road realignment options and will evaluate this trail as part of the transportation study and ongoing CR 10 design. Five-foot wide sidewalks are required to be provided on one side of each public street. Generally the plans show compliance with these requirements; however, the plans shall be revised to show these sidewalks to ensure connections throughout the entire development. Specifically: • The sidewalk locations should be extended through the association maintained neighborhood planned in the southeast corner of the site. o The applicant has suggested that, depending on the product type provided, they may request approval of a private street here. Regardless, of whether this is approved with a public or private street, staff believes that this sidewalk connection is important and has included this as a condition of approval. • To that end, we recommend that the sidewalk be moved to the south side of Street F so that this neighborhood cannot connect to the sidewalk system without a mid-block crossing. The Parks and Trails Commission did not feel strongly about this issue, but we have added a condition that the final location be determined with staff prior to approval of the final plat. • We also recommend that the sidewalk extension be shown on the stub street off the east side of the Street F cul de sac for a future sidewalk connection. Natural Resource Corridor This natural resource corridor is shown as preserved with a trail corridor. The City’s Comprehensive Plan encourages preservation of this corridor but does not recommend the land be taken as public Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 18 December 11, 2014 park. Staff recommends that the land be preserved and owned/maintained by the Homeowners Association. Community Park A public park to serve as the neighborhood park exists across County Road 10. This is defined in the Parks Plan as a community park, but will also serve the neighborhood park needs of the neighborhood, as noted by the Parks and Trails Commission in March. Good access is provided to this park and the playground by the planned trail and sidewalk connections. Our Comprehensive Plan says that neighborhood parks should be within ½ mile of residents. The applicant has provided an exhibit showing that all homes within this development would be within this ½ mile radius of the existing playground and most would be within ¼ mile. PUD Flexibility Standards In addition to the PUD flexibilities already outlined above, the developer has asked the City to consider an additional set of PUD flexibility standards that would allow some ability to modify the plan without a complete PUD amendment if the modifications fall with certain parameters. This would give them the ability to respond to changes in the marketplace and needs of different builders. The City has the ability to approve these flexibilities as part of the PUD and incorporate them into a development contract. Specifically: 1. Open Space – The total amount of open space will not be reduced by more than 2.5% or 1 acre from the amount shown in the approved PUD. 2. Development Footprint - Total development footprint as identified by street right-of-way and total lotted area cannot increase by more than 1 acre. 3. Wetland Buffer - At all times we will not reduce the amount of wetland buffer provided. 4. Storm Water - Storm water treatment areas may be modified, provided that the overall treatment standards are still equal to are greater than the standards approved with the Preliminary Plat. 5. Trails – Any plan must generally provide an east-west and north-south trail link as approved with the PUD Preliminary Plan and while the location of trails may be slightly adjusted the overall locations and length of trails will be honored. 6. Entrance Location(s) - Main entrance location off CR 10 will remain unchanged. 7. Total Units – The total units cannot be less than 235 (3.34 units /acre) and more than 275 (3.91 units/acre) without amending the PUD. 8. Association Maintained Housing –Blocks 20, 21 and Outlot O must be maintained and actively marketed for association maintained housing until the final phase is approved. If at that time with active marketing this has not sold, this area may be platted as single family. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 19 December 11, 2014 9. Housing Types– Housing/Lot types may change without amending the PUD so long as they meet the approved PUD lot standards. 10. Private Streets – If townhomes are added to the PUD private streets will be allowed, if needed, in the townhome areas to accommodate that housing type. 11. Lots and Blocks - Lots sizes may change within the limits approved, however, blocks as arranged need to stay generally consistent with approved Preliminary PUD and Plat. Staff finds that the proposed PUD flexibility provides the City assurances that the general development concept will be maintained while the developer the flexibility to respond to the marketplace. This is particularly important for the association maintained area planned for the southeast portion of the site, but may be applicable in other areas. If the City approves this flexibility, the only change staff would recommend is that number 10 be changed to say that private streets MAY be allowed. • This concept of PUD flexibility standards is new to the City and unique to the project. The Commission should comment on this proposal. Preliminary Plat The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat to allow the creation of 246 homes on this 103.32-acre site. The proposed development would have a net density (post-development) of approximately 3.5 units per acre. This is consistent with the land use plan, which would allow a density of 3-5 units per acre. Lot Size The PUD district has no minimum standards for lot size; however, the proposed development would comply with the density requirements permitted by the PUD. Development Phasing The developer plans to develop this project in 3 phases. The developer would like to begin work in 2015. Timing will be contingent upon extension of public infrastructure. The phasing plan may be modified at each stage to better correspond with public improvements. The Zoning Ordinance requires that construction begin within 1 year of the rezoning to PUD (which will occur with approval of the final PUD development plan for Phase I, except that the City Council may extend this time period for 1 additional year and the Subdivision Ordinance requires submittal of a final plat application within 1 year of preliminary plat approval unless otherwise approved by the City Council). Due the infrastructure issues, the City Council may wish to extend this approval to the full 2 years from the date of approval. Through the PUD process, the City has the legal authority to negotiate a phasing plan with the developer. The City does not have this same authority with standard zoning. The Council may approve the attached phasing plan. The phasing plan would be subject to the above standards in Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 20 December 11, 2014 the sense that the final plat for the 1st phase of development must be submitted within 2 years. This initial final plat will include all of the property, but phases 2 and 3 will likely be shown as outlots. The City Council may want to approve the attached phasing plan to ensure an understanding of the project timing. Obviously, the phasing schedule is the developer’s best estimate and is subject to change depending on market conditions and infrastructure timing. Staff recommends that all of the right-of-way for County Road 10 be dedicated with the first final plat. C. Conclusions Staff finds that the proposed plan is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The plan for single family homes provides many of the essential public components of the Comprehensive Plan, including open spaces, tree-lined streets and strong pedestrian connections. These features can establish the public realm of the neighborhood and provide a unique sense of place. The developer is requesting PUD flexibility for: • Reduced lot sizes (area and width), • Reduced setbacks, • Signage (sign area and number), • Flexibility from the architectural design standards, regarding garages, • Alternative wetland buffers, • Trails located within the buffer, • Shoreland Overlay District flexibility related to lot coverage, lot width, setbacks and building height. In return for this flexibility, the developer is providing: • HOA-maintained permanent open space (38% of the site), • HOA-maintained landscaping in the cul de sac islands and entry monument, • A restored urban forest with more than 1,620 new trees, • Decorative street lighting, • Sidewalks all public streets, • Dedication of a trail easement on the west side of the property without park dedication credit • Paving of the entry trail at no cost, • Preservation/restoration/enhancement of wetlands, • Financing of trunk infrastructure improvements, including a lift station in the project and improvements to County Road 10, • Life-cycle housing opportunities with single family detached homes and some association maintained housing planned. Staff has reviewed the plan for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. Staff noted in the staff report the outstanding that must be addressed and we have included conditions in the attached draft resolutions to address these issues. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 21 December 11, 2014 Next Steps If the application request is approved by the City Council, the applicant would be able to proceed with the Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat for each phase. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: a. Resolution 2014-72 approving the preliminary plat b. Resolution 2014-73 approving the preliminary PUD development plan c. Ordinance 2014-290 approving the rezoning to PUD d. Resolution 2014-74 approving finding of fact for the rezoning Attachments a. Resolution approving the preliminary plat b. Resolution approving the preliminary PUD development plan c. Ordinance approving the rezoning to PUD d. Resolution approving finding of fact for the rezoning e. Engineer’s Memo dated November 24, 2014 f. Applicant’s Narrative dated November 21, 2014 g. Site Graphics received November 21, 2014(partial only – full set available at City hall) h. Preliminary Plat received November 21, 2014 i. Exhibits dated November 21, 2014 j. Hennepin County Comments dated December 1, 2014 k. Letter from David Foy and Chuck Lymangood dated November 30, 2014 Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 22 December 11, 2014 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -72 Motion By: Asleson Seconded By: Thomas December 11, 2014 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "SAWGRASS" FOR PEACHTREE PARTNERS, LLC ON THE 103 -ACRE SCHENDEL PROPERTY AT 20400 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 23 -119- 23 -42 -0003) (CITY FILE 14 -027) WHEREAS, Peachtree Partners, LLC ( "the applicant ") has requested approvalof a preliminary plat for 246 singlefamily homes on a 103.32 -acre parcel legally described as: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed theplanat a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVEDBYTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it shouldand hereby doesapprove the request for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approvedto allow the creationof 246 single family lots and several outlots, in accordance with the applicationmaterials andplans received by the City on October 3, 2014 and revisions received November 21, 2014, except asamended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approvalof the rezoning to PUD and preliminary PUD development plan. 3. The application shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer's memo dated November 24, 2014. 4. The application is subject to the review andapproval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. The applicant shall comply with anyconditionsofapproval from the watershed. 5. The application is subjectto the review and approval by HennepinCounty. The applicant shall comply withany conditions ofapprovalfrom theCounty. 6. Development standards shall be as approved as part of the PUD. 7. The development shall be subject to all conditions of the preliminary PUD development plan approval. 8. The extension ofsanitary sewer and municipal water is required to serve thissite. Approval of this preliminary plat is contingent upon extension of these services tothe site. Page 1 of 4 City of Corcoran December 11, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -72 9. Approval shallexpire within two years of the dateof approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application forapproval of a final plat. VOTINGAYE Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declaredadopted on this 11`h day of December 2014. ST: J nie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 2 of 4 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -72 ATTACHMENTA Legal Description perTitle Commitment File No. 37676 December 11, 2014 Tract A: That part of the SoutheastQuarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North ofHennepin County Road #10 which was formerly called the MinneapolisMonticello road, excepting therefrom thefollowing described parcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feetof theSoutheast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feetof theEast 990.00 feetof the South 792.00 feetof the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thenceEast a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the SoutheastQuarter said last describedpoint beingthe point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet to the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet tothe actualpointof beginning. Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest cornerof said Southeast Quarterof the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feetto a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest cornerofthe Southeast Quarter of theSoutheast Quarter, thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of theSoutheast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet tothe point of beginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in theSouth line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feet Eastof the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distanceof 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet tothe center line ofCounty Road #10 andtothe actualpointofbeginning of land to be described; thencecontinuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet tothe center line ofCounty Road #10; Page 3 of 4 City of Corcoran December 11, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -72 thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of205.00 feet more or less to actual pointofbeginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a pointNorth 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feetfrom a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet tothe actualpoint of beginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West tothe center line of the road; thence Southeasterly alongsaid center line toan intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the point of beginning; thence North45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line ofCounty Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest cornerof the Southeast Quarter ofSection 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center ofCounty Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point of beginning. Tract B: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of theEast Half of the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerline of Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the Northeastcornerof the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence onan assumedbearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the point ofbeginning; thenceSouth 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet to the intersection with thesurveyline as shown and delineated on Hennepin CountyState Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, to the intersectionwithsaidEast line; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet to the point of beginning. Tract C: That part ofthe Southeast Quarterof the SoutheastQuarter of Section Twenty -three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty -three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter SE1 /4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) distant 147.17 feet East ofthe Southwestcornerof said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the SoutheastQuarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutesEast a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line runningparallel with theEast line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with theEast line of said SoutheastQuarter (SE 1/4) of theSoutheast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distance of 174.80 feet; thenceWest 182.83 feet tothe point of beginning. HennepinCounty, Minnesota Abstract Property Page 4 of 4 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 Motion By: Thomas Seconded By: Asleson December 11, 2014 APPROVING PRELIMINARYPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLAN FOR SAWGRASS" FOR PEACHTREE PARTNERS, LLC ON THE 103 -ACRESCHENDEL PROPERTY AT20400 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 23- 119 -23 -42 -0003) (CITY FILE 14 -027) WHEREAS, Peachtree Partners, LLC ( "the applicant ") has requested approval of a preliminary PUD development plan for 246 single family homes ona 103.32 -acre parcel legallydescribed as: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a duly calledPublic Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and herebydoes approve the request for a preliminary PUD development plan, subject to the followingconditions: 1. A preliminary PUD development plan is approved to allow thecreation of 226 single family homes, 20 twinhomes and several outlots, in accordance with the application materials and plans received by the City on October 3, 214 and revisions received November 21, 2014, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requestedrezoning and preliminary plat. 3. The applicant shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer's memo dated November 24, 2014. 4. The approval is subject tothe review and approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. The applicant shall comply with any conditionsof approval from the watershed. 5. The application is subject tothe reviewandapproval by Hennepin County. The applicant is required to obtain permits and approvals from the County as needed. 6. The extension of sanitarysewer and municipal water is required to servethissite. Approval of this PUD is contingent upon extensionof these services tothe site. 7. The preliminary PUD development plan is approved based on the findingthat the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Page 1 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 8. All platted residential lots shall complywith the followingsetbacks: December 11, 2014 9. Mechanical equipment (including air conditioning units) must be located in the side or rear yardand must be located a minimum of 5 feet from the property line. 10. All properties must have a minimum 22 -foot driveway parking area in front of thegarage that does not overlap into sidewalks, drives or streets. The building permit must dimension this parkingarea in front of thegarage. Architectural and Design standards 11. All Design Requirements for the RSF -3 district described in Section 1040.050, Subd. 8 shall be met, except that PUD flexibility is grantedfor the following: a. Adjacenthomes may be allowed to have the samecolor and type of roofing productprovided the architectural details and materialcolors for the homeare different. Page 2 of 10 Detached Single Family Detached Villas Twinhome Townhome 5,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. /per for flexibility - -the unit smallest lot shown is Minimum Lot Area 6,555) Minimum lot width 55 feet 40 feet 75 feet 30 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks Front, From all 20 feet 20 feet 22 feet 20 feet other streets Front Porch (5 15 feet* 15 feet* 15 feet* 15 feet* 120 square feet) 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet between Deck (side and buildings (0 rear) between units Side (living) 5 feet 5 feet 10 feet 10 feet Side (garage) ** 5 feet 5 feet 10 feet 10 feet Rear 25 feet 20 feet 20 feet 15 feet Maximum 35 feel 35 feel 35 feel 35 fee Principal Building Height Driveway 5 feet 5 feeI 5 feet between 5 feet between setback buildings buildings Porches may be allowed to encroach and same on eitherfront setback on corner lots. 9. Mechanical equipment (including air conditioning units) must be located in the side or rear yardand must be located a minimum of 5 feet from the property line. 10. All propertiesmust have a minimum 22 -foot driveway parking area in front of thegarage that does not overlap into sidewalks, drives or streets. The building permit must dimensionthis parkingarea in front of thegarage. Architectural and Design standards 11. All Design Requirements for the RSF -3 district described in Section 1040.050, Subd. 8 shall be met, except that PUD flexibility is grantedfor the following: a. Adjacenthomes may be allowed to have the samecolor and type of roofing productprovided the architectural details and materialcolors for the homeare different. Page 2 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 December 11, 2014 Town home/twinhome units will be grantedsome flexibility from the requirement that 5 different styles of home be provided in that neighborhood andfrom the requirement thatadjacent homes not look alike. In these types of neighborhoods, some consistency between buildings is desired, but it is important to provide some variety with the homes. However, since no home plan has been provided, the City will work with the applicant to determine the extent of this flexibility when a development proposal forthat site is submitted. c. PUD flexibility is provided to allow theface of the garage to exceed55% of the building face and allow up to60% fordetached single family homesand 70% for twinhomes /town homes. d. The intent of the ordinance is to require the side and rear ofhomesthat are located on or visible from public parks or arterial streets to have architectural elements similar tothe frontelevation. These homes must continue materials and colors from the frontelevation tothe sideand rear elevations. This may be through the use of the same window trim, accent bands orother elementsfound on the front of the home. Blank, flat elevations with only one siding color or material will not be permitted for these units. 12. The applicant shall providecopies of the final HOA documents /covenants for Cityreview as part of the final plat application. 13. The developer shall providecentralized mailbox locations. A mailbox plan shall be provided for City review and approval. Parking 14. Parking shall be permitted on one side of the local streets and shall be signed in accordance with city standards. 15. No parking shall be permitted on County Road 10. 16. Townhomes (if proposed) shall be required to provide guest parkingstalls as required in Section 1060.060, Subd. 8. Landscaping and Lighting 17. A revisedlandscape planshall be provided for City Councilreview prior to approvalof the finalplat and PUD final plan. The revised planshall identify the number, location, species and plant sizes and locations to ensure compliance with the Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance. 18. A mix ofornamental trees, perennials and annuals shall also be provided in the medians. 19. The developer shall submit a revised landscape plan for Cityreview and approvalof the proposedlandscaping in the cul de sac islands to ensure planting materials will withstand the stresses of these locations. Page 3 of 10 City of Corcoran December 11, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 20. The HOA shall be responsible for planting, irrigation and maintenance of the median landscaping and all landscaping within the cul de sac islands. 21. Lawn sprinklers /irrigation systems (if provided) shall all have rain sensors to limit unnecessarywatering. 22. The HOA shall be responsible for maintenance of all common lots. 23. The applicant shall work with theCity to finalize the designof the decorative lighting that will be installed. The applicant shall provide the street lights in compliance with City Policy. 24. PUD flexibility is granted to allow additional development signage for the two main entrances and sub - association neighborhoods. Amaster sign plan for the development shall be submitted for City review and approval with the final PUD development plan in compliance with the following standards: a) Up to 3 signs allowed ateachentrance. One on each side and one in the median as applicable. b) Signarea is measured by drawing a box aroundthelettering c) Total signage at the main entrance shall not exceed 80 sq. ft. Individual monument signs shall not exceed 40 sq. ft. d) Total signageat thesecond entrance shall notexceed 40 sq. ft. Individual monument signs shall not exceed 20 square feet. e) Median signs may be located in the right -of -way, provided the applicant provides an exhibitshowingthat sight visibility is maintained. f) Monument signs must comply with the minimum 5 -foot setback and be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. g) Illuminated and /or backlitlettering and both downward and upward focused lighting will be allowed so long as thesourceof light is notvisible to drivers and pedestrians. Lighting mustcomply with the standards in Section 1060.040and glare, whether direct or reflected, shall not be visible beyond thelimits of the site fromwhich it originates. h) Monument signs shallnot exceed 8 feet in height, however, median monuments may be allowed upto 11 feet tall. i) Trailheadsignage shall be provided where the trails crosspublic streets and shall be installed in accordance withcity standards. Streets, Parking and Utilities 25. All streets within the development shall be public streets. 26. Thepreliminary plat shall be revised to clearlydimension the required 45 -foothalf right -of- wayfor County Road 10. 27. Utilities shall be stubbed to the property lines forfuture extension to adjacentproperties. The stubs shall be at the developer's expense. 28. A public access for emergency vehicle accessandtrail connection shall be provided from the long cul de sac (street f) tothe northeaststreetconnection. This shall be a 12 -foot wide emergency vehicle accesswith knockdownbollards andshall also serve as a trail. Page 4 of 10 City of Corcoran December 11, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 29. The developmentshall comply with the Fire Chief's requirements regarding fire access, fire protection and fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, firedepartment connections, and fire lane signage. Sidewalks and Trails 30. Sidewalks and trails shall be as shown on the Development Open Space exhibit dated November 21, 2014. a. Trails shall be allowed in the wetland buffer as shown. b. The final location of the sidewalk on Street F shall be determined with the PUD final plan. c. Sidewalks shall be constructed on all public streets, including stub streets, at the time of street construction. d. Sidewalks shall be provided on one sideofthe public street in the twinhome neighborhood. 31. The HOA or individual homeowners shall be responsible forsnow removal on public sidewalks within the development. 32. Sidewalks shall be 5 feet wide. Wetlands 33. Alternative wetlandbuffers shall be allowed, subject to the standards and conditions in Section 1050.010, Subd. 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. Wetland buffers must be dimensioned on the plans. 34. The plans shall be revised to identify the wetland buffer monuments as required by Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. 35. The developer must install wetland buffer monumentsprior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancyforadjacent buildings. Drainage / Stormwater Management 36. Drainage and utility easements must be provided over all wetlands, wetland buffers and ponds. 37. The applicant shall continue to work with the City and adjacent property owners to address the off -site drainage issues as noted in the City Engineer's memo. Offsite stormwater conveyance will be constructed at developer's expense based on wetland and watershed approvals and northerly property owners providing easements. Page 5 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 Shoreland Overlay District December 11, 2014 38. PUD flexibility is granted from thefollowing Shoreland Overlay District standards in Section 1050.020 of the Zoning Ordinance: a. allow more than25% impervious surface coverageper lot in this area b. allow 35 foot building heights as allowed by the underlying zoning district C. allow 55 -foot wide lots where 75 feet is typically required d. allow a 25 -foot setback from County Road 10 where 50 is required 39. ThePUD flexibility is granted based on the finding that: a. The shoreland area within the development is less than 6% of the project area. b. Theshoreland areaalong County Road 10 is separatedfrom thecreek by County Road 10 and all drainage is directed north away from the creek. c. The total impervious surface coverage will exceed ordinancerequirementsfor individual lots, butthe total impervious coverage within the portions of the overlay district where the creek is located within OutlotAof the development does notexceed the 25% limit. d. The planned development will preserve approximately 40 acres (38% of the site) as permanent open space and has included stormwater management techniques within the development toensure protection of the shoreland areas. e. The lots do not directly abut County Road 10 and are separated from the road by an outlot. Park Dedication 40. Park dedication shall bea combination of land and cash. The final dedication requirements shall be determined with the final plat for phase I of the development and shall generally be as follows: a. Dedication of off -road trails as shown on the Development Open Space Plan dated November 21, 2014. i. Trails shall be8 feet wide in 20 -footeasements and credit will be given for the full easement. The emergency access in the northeastcorner shall be a12 -foot trail in 30 -foot easement, but credit for this wider trailshall be given only for the standard 20 -foot width. b. The remainder of thepark dedication shall be cash in lieu of land C. The developer shall pave the entrance trail shown between County Road 10 and the large wetland area ( Outlot N) withoutpaving reimbursement. d. Recommended that the developer donate a trail easement on the west side of the project adjacent to thecreek. No improvements are required in this easement and no park dedicationcredit will be provided. e. The park dedication for the trail easements shall be deeded with each phase of development. f. Cash for park dedication shall be paid in full by phase II. g. Credit shall be given for trail paving, ifdirected by the City. Miscellaneous 41. In addition tothe PUD flexibilities already outlined above, the following PUD flexibility standards are approved and shall be incorporated into the development contract: Page 6 of 10 City of Corcoran December 11, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 a. Open Space — The total amountof open spacewill not be reduced by more than 2.5% or 1 acre from the amount shown in the approved PUD. b. Development Footprint - Total development footprint as identified by street right -of- way and total lottedarea cannot increase by more than 1 acre. c. WetlandBuffer - At all timeswe willnot reduce the amount of wetland buffer provided. d. Storm Water - Storm water treatment areas may be modified, providedthat the overall treatment standards are still equal to or greater than the standards approved with thePreliminary Plat, as approved by the City Engineer. e. Trails — Any plan must generally provide an east -west andnorth -south trail link as approved with the PUD Preliminary Plan and while the location oftrails may be slightly adjusted theoverall locations andlength of trails will be honored f. EntranceLocation(s) - Main entrance location off CR 10 willremain unchanged. g. Total Units — The total units cannot be lessthan 235 (3.34 units /acre) and more than 275 (3.91 units /acre) withoutamending the PUD. h. Association Maintained Housing — Blocks 20, 21 and Outlot O must be maintained and activelymarketedforassociationmaintained housing until the final phase is approved. If atthat time with active marketing this has not sold, this area may be platted as single family. When the final plat for the first phase of the development is recorded, the developer willlist this land forsale, with an independent third party realtor, who will agree to actively market the this property forassociation maintained housing. The Realtor will also commit toprovide the City Administrator with quarterly reports on the efforts being made to market the parcel and market responses. i. HousingTypes— Housing /Lot types may change without amendingthe PUD solong as theymeet the approved PUDlot standards and include at least 3 housing /lot types overall. j. Lots and Blocks - Lots sizes may change within the limits approved, however, blocks as arranged need to stay generally consistent withapproved Preliminary PUD and Plat. 42. The phasing plan submitted by the developer is approved. 43. A final PUD development plan must submittedwith the finalplat for review and approval. Page 7 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota VOTINGAYE Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 VOTING NAY Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron December 11, 2014 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declaredadopted on this 11th day of December 2014. EST: 4nie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 8 of 10 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 ATTACHMENT A Legal Description perTitle Commitment File No. 37676 December 11, 2014 Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter ofSection 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 which was formerly called the Minneapolis Monticello road, exceptingtherefrom the followingdescribed parcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feetof the SoutheastQuarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feetof the East 990.00 feet of the South 792.00 feetof the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: All that part of the Southeast Quarter ofSection 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at theSouthwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distanceof 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the SoutheastQuarter saidlast describedpoint beingthe point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet to the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the SoutheastQuarter; thence West 141.37 feet tothe actualpointofbeginning. Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarterof the SoutheastQuarter of Section23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwestcornerof said SoutheastQuarterof the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel withthe East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwestcornerof the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence Southparallel with theEast line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the pointofbeginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the SoutheastQuarter ofSection 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feetEastof the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet tothe center line ofCounty Road #10 andtothe actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutesEast a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distanceof 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet tothe center line ofCounty Road #10; Page 9 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 December 11, 2014 thence Southeasterly along said center line a distanceof205.00 feet more or less to actual pointofbeginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line ofCounty Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feetfrom a point 1289.70 feet Eastfrom the Southwestcornerof the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet tothe actual pointofbeginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thenceSouth 45 degrees 53 minutes West to the center line of the road; thenceSoutheasterly along said center lineto an intersection with a line bearingSouth 45 degrees 53 minutes Westfrom the point ofbeginning; thence North 45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line ofCounty Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of theSouthwest cornerof the Southeast Quarter ofSection 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center ofCounty Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point ofbeginning. Tract B: The East Half of the SouthwestQuarter ofSection 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of the EastHalfof the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerlineof Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing atthe Northeastcornerof the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the pointofbeginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet to theintersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin CountyState Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, to theintersection with saidEast line; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet tothe pointof beginning. Tract C: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the SoutheastQuarter of Section Twenty -three (23), Township One HundredNineteen (119), Range Twenty -three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter SE1 /4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 114) distant 147.17 feet East ofthe Southwestcornerof said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutesEast a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distanceof 73.90 feet to a line running parallel withthe East line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the SoutheastQuarter (SE 114) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the SoutheastQuarter (SE 114) ofSoutheast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distanceof 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point ofbeginning. HennepinCounty, Minnesota Abstract Property Page 10 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -290 Motion By: Thomas Seconded By: Asleson December 11. 2014 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLEX (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAINLAND LOCATED AT 20400 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID23- 119- 23 -42- 0003) (CITY FILE 14 -027) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Title Xof the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is herebyamended by changingthe classification on the City ofCorcoran Zoning Map fromRMF -3 (High DensityResidential) and UR (Urban Reserve) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with respect to the 103.32 -acreparcel, legallydescribed as follows: See Attachment A Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon adoption of the resolution approving the final PUD development plan for this project. VOTINGAYE Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Ordinance is herebyapproved on this 11`h day of December 2014. TEST: anie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 1 of 3 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -290 ATTACHMENTA Legal Description per TitleCommitment File No. 37676 December 11. 2014 Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter ofSection 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 whichwas formerly calledthe Minneapolis Monticello road, excepting therefrom the following describedparcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feetof the Southeast Quarter ofSection 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feetof the East 990.00 feetof the South 792.00 feet of the Southeast QuarterofSection 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: Allthat part of the Southeast Quarterof Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning atthe Southwest cornerof the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thenceSouth 28 degrees and53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet Eastof the Southwest cornerof the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter said lastdescribed point being the point of beginning of the landto be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutesEast a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feetto the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet tothe actual pointofbeginning. Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast QuarterofSection 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the SoutheastQuarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said SoutheastQuarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with theEast line of the Southeast Quarter of theSoutheast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence Southparallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet tothe pointof beginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, HennepinCounty, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarterdistant 1289.70 feet Eastof the Southwestcorner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutesEast a distance of 3.74 feetto the center line ofCounty Road #10 and to the actualpointof beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distanceof 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distanceof 180.05 feet to the center line ofCounty Road #10; Page 2 of 3 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO, 2014 -290 December 11, 2014 thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of 205.00 feetmore or less to actual pointofbeginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwestcorner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet tothe actual pointof beginning; thencecontinuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thenceSouth 45 degrees 53 minutes West to the center line of the road; thence Southeasterly along said center line to an intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the pointofbeginning; thence North45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feetfrom a point 1289.70 feet Eastof the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center ofCounty Road; thence Northwesterly alongcenter line topoint of beginning. Tract B: The EastHalfof the Southwest QuarterofSection 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of theEast Half of the SouthwestQuarter which lies South of the centerline of HennepinCounty Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencingat the Northeastcornerof the NortheastQuarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumedbearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallelwith said East line, 575.70 feetto the intersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, tothe intersection with said East line; thenceNortherly, along said East line, 905.74 feet tothe pointof beginning. Tract C: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty -three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty -three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginningat a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter SE1 /4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) distant 147.17 feetEastof the Southwestcornerof said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with theEast line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) ofSoutheast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel withthe East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point ofbeginning. HennepinCounty, Minnesota Abstract Property Page 3 of 3 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -74 Motion By: Thomas Seconded By: Asleson December 11, 2014 APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING OF "SAWGRASS" FOR PEACHTREE PARTNERS, LLC ON THE 103 -ACRE SCHENDEL PROPERTY AT 20400 COUNTY ROAD 10 PID23- 119 -23 -42 -0003) (CITY FILE 14 -027) WHEREAS, Peachtree Partners, LLC ( "the applicant') has requested approval of a rezoning from Urban Reserve (UR) andRMF -3 (High Density Residential) to PUD (planned unit development) for a103.32 -acre parcel legallydescribed as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcelfromUrban Reserve (UR) and RMF -3 (High Density Residential) to PUD; NOW, THEREFORE, BEIT HEREBYRESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the request by Peachtree Partners, LLC for the reclassification of the zoning from UR and RMF -3 to PUD for the 103-32 - acre property, based on the following findings: Theplanned unit development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposeddensityof 3.5 units peracre is within the 3 -5 units per acre expected in the Low Density Residential land use classification and the plan incorporates the trail, infrastructure and street connections anticipatedwithin in the site. 2. The planned development of 246single family homes is consistent with the intent of an underlying RSF -3 zoningdistrict, which allows a mix of single and two - family homes. The applicant is requesting approvalof PUD zoning for design flexibility to provide a mix of lot sizes for this neighborhood at a density consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The development is not in conflict with other applicableprovisionsof thezoning ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer will provide both internal infrastructure needed to support their development and trunk infrastructure improvements that will serve a larger development area and well as increased amenities and better neighborhood design than might be expected in a standard subdivision. 4. The planned development is feasiblewithout dependence uponany othersubsequent phase. The projecthas a 3 -5 year phasing planand development is contingent upon completionof trunkinfrastructure improvements. The initialphase will include the construction of the primary projectinfrastructure, lift station and other keypublic infrastructure improvement. Page 1 of 4 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -74 December 11, 2014 5. The planned development willnot create an excessiveburden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing public trails consistent withthe City's Comprehensive Plan and a strongpedestrianconnection tothe existing City park. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve this site atthe developer's expense. 6. The planned development is a residential neighborhood developed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore, willnot have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonableenjoyment of the neighborhood property. 7. The quality of the site designproposed by the PUD shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, install and provide more efficient use ofstreets, utilities and public facilities than may otherwise be expected andcreate publicbenefit that is greater than would otherwise be achieved due to the construction and financing of all related infrastructureimprovements. The development will meet the City's density goals while preserving 38% of thesite as preserved openspace maintained by the homeowner's association (much of it wetland and ponding areas, but woodedareas and public trails as well). 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve this site if the conditionsof PUD preliminary plan and preliminary plat are met. VOTING AYE Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 11th day of December 2014. Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor TEST: City Seal eanieHeinecke — Clerk Page 2 of 4 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -74 ATTACHMENT A Legal Description perTitle Commitment File No. 37676 December 11, 2014 Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 whichwas formerly calledthe MinneapolisMonticello road, excepting therefrom the followingdescribed parcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feet of the East 990.00 feet of the South 792.00 feetof the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: Allthat part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginningat the Southwest corner of the SoutheastQuarterof said Section23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the Southline oftheSoutheast Quarter of the Southeast Quarterdistant 5.80 feet East of the Southwestcornerof the SoutheastQuarterof the Southeast Quarter saidlast described point being thepoint ofbeginningof thelandtobe described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distanceof 280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet tothe South line of the SoutheastQuarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet to the actual point ofbeginning. Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarterdistant 147.17 feet East of theSouthwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the SoutheastQuarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest cornerof the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the SoutheastQuarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet tothe pointof beginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the SoutheastQuarter ofSection 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in theSouth line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet to the center line ofCounty Road #10 and tothe actual point ofbeginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thenceSouth 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet tothe center line ofCounty Road #10; Page 3 of 4 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -74 December 11, 2014 thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of205.00 feetmore or less to actual pointof beginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feetfrom a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutesWest 147.95 feet tothe actualpointofbeginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thenceSouth 45 degrees 53 minutes West tothe center line of the road; thence Southeasterly along said center line to an intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the pointof beginning; thence North 45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest cornerof the Southeast Quarter ofSection 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center ofCounty Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point ofbeginning. Tract B: TheEast Halfof the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerlineof Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarterdescribed as follows: Commencing at the Northeastcorner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to thepoint ofbeginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 secondsEast, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet tothe intersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, tothe intersection with saidEastline; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet to the pointofbeginning. Tract C: That part of the SoutheastQuarter oftheSoutheast Quarter of Section Twenty -three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty -three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter SE1 /4) of the SoutheastQuarter (SE 1/4) distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of saidSoutheast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 114) of the SoutheastQuarter (SE 1/4) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest cornerofthe SoutheastQuarter (SE 1/4) of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distanceof 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet tothe pointof beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property Page 4 of 4 N 3 6 ° 1 7'1 2 " W 1 3 2.1 2 N89°36'01"W 2210.00N89°36'01"W 1175.21N46°43'16"W 26.87 L=514.30 R=3545.77 Δ=8°18'38" N55°01'54"W 449.76 L=111.43 R=1638.52 Δ=3°53'48" S0°03'25"E 533.00 S89°56'35"W 300.00 S0°03'25"E 849.88 L = 5 1 3.6 7 R = 5 6 9 5.7 7 Δ = 5 ° 1 0'0 2" N 41°2 7'1 4" W 108 8.73 N46°26'24"E 136.78 S47°18'36"E 226.15 S76°34'36"E 108.90 S29°31'00"W 19.38 S68°58'36"E 125.00 S29°31'00"W 194.15 L=121.16R=445.48Δ=15°34'58" N89°28'17"W 62.67 N0°05'35"E 776.35 S89°26'36"E 518.62 N0°05'35"E 1844.37 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > O H P XX X X 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 1 2 3 4 5 21 3 1213 6 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 3 2 1 5 4 20 18 17 19 16 15 141213 7 118910 5 6 3 4 21 16 151413 17 1211109876543 2 1 14131211768910 543 2 1 1211109876543 2 1 9876543 2 1 65432 1 181716 3 15 14 13 11 12 9 10 8 7 6 5 4 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 9 8 10 11 13 1412 5 13 12 11 10 1 9 8 2 4 7 3 10 9 12 13 14 15 16 7 6 8 18 17 3 5 2 4 1 7 651423 6 7 8 5 3 4 1 2 9 11 12 10 13 22 23 21 15 16 19 18 17 14 1 2 3 4 2 3 1 5 6 4 9 10 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 ROAD A RO A D B ROADC R O A D C ROAD D R O A D D R O A D D R O A D E R O A D F R O A D C R OA D G R O A D F ROAD F ROADI 8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 50 5 0 50 50 R=60 R =6 0 R=60 42.5 42.5 85 50 50 45 50 4 5 15 78 910 1211 1314 56 1 2 43 4 12 3 7 65 8 9 6 60 BLOCK 1 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AREA/SQ FT 9622.81 6600.00 8117.32 9414.13 9324.28 9456.06 9927.58 9324.28 18462.07 BLOCK 2 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 AREA/SQ FT 6888.93 6868.79 6870.00 7228.45 13996.66 BLOCK 3 LOTS 1 2 3 AREA/SQ FT 9577.29 6600.00 6555.77 BLOCK 4 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AREA/SQ FT 12801.12 7800.00 7800.00 7861.22 10191.41 9170.97 9819.64 11036.15 11036.15 11036.15 11036.15 9499.25 11857.04 7800.00 7800.00 7800.00 10688.85 BLOCK 5 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 AREA/SQ FT 8426.57 8408.40 8162.39 8115.36 8116.42 8116.67 8094.75 8434.39 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 11490.94 12254.40 9351.76 9400.74 9400.74 9392.06 9418.47 9593.00 BLOCK 6 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AREA/SQ FT 7800.00 8867.53 11845.96 8099.13 8735.95 8602.50 8213.01 8368.79 8241.59 8264.84 8405.55 8551.72 8542.12 8731.36 8715.49 8731.44 8719.54 BLOCK 7 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 AREA/SQ FT 10800.00 7968.97 8214.80 8411.96 8411.96 8178.24 8416.29 8416.29 8178.24 8411.96 8411.96 8178.24 8369.50 10435.31 BLOCK 8 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 AREA/SQ FT 10800.00 7992.67 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8093.77 8139.34 11768.60 BLOCK 9 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AREA/SQ FT 13529.88 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 13130.78 BLOCK 10 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 AREA/SQ FT 11337.18 8542.12 8542.12 8542.12 8542.12 10972.23 BLOCK 11 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 AREA/SQ FT 11827.49 7849.13 8511.08 7430.90 6837.18 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6625.06 7097.93 7214.24 7031.47 7008.01 7533.22 BLOCK 12 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 AREA/SQ FT 6955.94 6694.09 6626.15 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.56 6995.05 7219.10 7347.32 7282.97 7477.44 7216.39 8881.17 BLOCK 13 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 AREA/SQ FT 14344.11 6598.13 6600.00 7153.05 8635.75 7950.00 6600.00 6600.00 6947.32 7839.14 7302.88 6600.00 11887.02 BLOCK 14 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 AREA/SQ FT 10064.92 6608.18 6600.00 7076.20 7626.67 10088.47 8331.71 7381.80 6875.00 6875.00 7631.70 8240.70 6921.30 6875.00 6875.00 6875.00 7003.18 11565.76 BLOCK 15 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AREA/SQ FT 12795.84 10528.73 9794.09 10986.54 13501.00 18564.66 20182.26 12943.45 BLOCK 16 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 AREA/SQ FT 9774.33 9000.00 9000.00 9000.00 9714.22 10325.89 10000.58 10032.78 9981.76 9981.76 9981.76 10028.68 10179.53 10210.88 9518.60 9651.07 9872.97 9607.32 14267.07 12005.05 12153.70 12755.28 12755.28 BLOCK 17 LOTS 1 2 3 4 AREA/SQ FT 10864.08 9410.60 9437.60 9719.13 BLOCK 18 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 AREA/SQ FT 9607.31 9151.53 9110.96 9387.14 9766.23 9734.70 BLOCK 19 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AREA/SQ FT 12764.38 9127.69 9514.72 9524.09 9347.32 9347.32 9335.57 9928.06 10760.45 10257.83 BLOCK 20 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AREA/SQ FT 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 25296.60 BLOCK 21 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 AREA/SQ FT 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 86862.68 OUTLOTS OUTLOTS A B C D E F G H I J K L M N AREA/SQ FT 5925.89 40838.20 176255.78 21389.72 29963.80 121212.65 37356.73 43657.01 25210.32 4651.98 3148.77 87208.31 12569.93 599409.89 O P Q R 29140.02 8721.41 4168.36 22166.73 S T U V 3735.93 150350.58 69626.26 1930.08 W14606.59 X Y Z 566.02 64585.73 51585.74 AA 2666.70 OUTLOTS OUTLOTS AREA/SQ FT OUTLOTS OUTLOTS AREA/SQ FT SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO. WA S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , O R R E P O R T AN D T H A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D UN D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F PR I N T N A M E : SI G N A T U R E : DA T E : LI C . N O . REVISION CHECKED Plo t D a t e : 1 1 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 4 - 1 1 : 3 5 a m Dr a w i n g n a m e : V : \ 1 9 3 8 \ m i s c e l l a n e o u s \ 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 \ C A D \ D w g \ 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 V 4 0 1 . d w g Xr e f s : , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X S P V , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X B R D , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X S X V , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X S X T , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 V 3 0 1 T O P O , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X S X W , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X S X V 2 0 0 S C A L E TH E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L V E R I F Y A N D B E R E S P O N S I B L E F O R A L L D I M E N S I O N S . D O N O T S C A L E T H E DR A W I N G - A N Y E R R O R S O R O M I S S I O N S S H A L L B E R E P O R T E D T O S T A N T E C W I T H O U T D E L A Y . TH E C O P Y R I G H T S T O A L L D E S I G N S A N D D R A W I N G S A R E T H E P R O P E R T Y O F S T A N T E C . R E P R O D U C T I O N OR U S E F O R A N Y P U R P O S E O T H E R T H A N T H A T A U T H O R I Z E D B Y S T A N T E C I S F O R B I D D E N . PE A C H T R E E P A R T N E R S SA W G R A S S , C O R C O R A N , M N 193802577 N 0 200400 Legal Description per Title Commitment File No. 37676 Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 which was formerly called the Minneapolis Monticello road, excepting therefrom the following described parcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feet of the East 990.00 feet of the South 792.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter said last described point being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet to the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet to the actual point of beginning. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SAWGRASS Land Surveyor: Linda H. Brown Stantec Consulting 3717 23rd Street SouthSt. Cloud, MN 56301 320-229-5535 Owner/Developer: Peachtree PartnersDavid Newman1521 94th Lane NE Minneapolis, MN 55449763-792-8975 Current Zoning - UR (Urban Reserve) and RMF-3 High Density Residential Proposed Zoning - PUD (Planned Unit Development) Total Acreage of Plat = 103.32 Acres+/- E. LINE OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119 R23 SURVEY LINE PER HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 10, PLAT 8 NE CORNER OF THE NE1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 NE CORNER OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 (BROKEN PK NAIL) E. LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 SE CORNER OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 (HENNEPIN CTY CIM) S. LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 SW CORNER OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD #10 66.00 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY FOR C.S.A.H. 10 PER DOC. NO. 3867013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1718 19 OUTLOT A OUTLOTB OUTLOT C OUTLOT D O U T L O T E O U T L O T F O U TLO T G OUTLOTH OUTLOT I 11 OUTLOT O O U T L O T P OU T L O T M OUTLOT N VICINITY & ZONING MAP C.S.A.H.10 C.S.A.H.50 SITE ZONED UR ZONED RMF-3 Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet to the center line of County Road #10 and to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet to the center line of County Road #10; thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of 205.00 feet more or less to actual point of beginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West to the center line of the road; thence Southeasterly along said center line to an intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the point of beginning; thence North 45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center of County Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point of beginning. Tract B: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerline of Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet to the intersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, to the intersection with said East line; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet to the point of beginning. Tract C: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty-three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty-three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property V4.01 PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T MM REH LHB LHB SU R V E Y O R MI N N E S O T A LI N D A H . B R O W N 23 6 8 2 SEE SHEET V4.02 FOR LEGEND OUTLOTK OUTLOT L O U T L O T Z OUTLOT R OUTLOTQ OUTLOT S OUTLOT Y OUTLOT T OUTLOT U O UT LO T V OUTLOT W OUTLOT X O UT LO T A A 20 21 O U T LOT J 1OUTLOT/EASEMENT11/19/14 NOTE: ALL PONDS, WETLANDS, AND WETLAND BUFFERS WILL BE PLATTED IN OUTLOTS AND DEDICATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN THE FINAL PLAT. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: February 21, 2019 for the February 28, 2019 City Council Meeting RE: City-Initiated Bee Keeping Ordinance (City File 17-038) 60-Day Review Deadline: N/A 1.Application Request Consider allowing bee keeping in all zoning districts. 2.Planning Commission Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing at their regularly scheduled February 7, 2019 meeting. Three people spoke during the public hearing. Commissioners voted 3-0 to recommend approval of the proposed changes with the following revisions, which are included in the attached resolution: 1)Break out the second sentence of 1(h) as a new sub header (i) with a language change to include public institutional as a zone. 3.Background Staff has researched animals in commercial districts in response to complaints and questions from local businesses. There is some interest from Heidi’s Lifestyle Garden to keep bees as part of the commercial operations. The Council reviewed this amendment at their January 25th, 2018 and December 27th, 2018 meeting. A subcommittee was created to discuss the ordinance amendment and is recommending that bee keeping be allowed in all zoning districts. The bee ordinance is the recommended ordinance language from the subcommittee with a few minor modifications by staff. It is staff’s understanding that the subcommittee’s recommendation is based on research from other cities and the University of Minnesota. 4.Analysis of Request Bee keeping is a common practice in both urban and suburban communities. Staff and the subcommittee reviewed several cities in the region and the University of Minnesota Bee Lab to understand how other communities and local experts address bee keeping in residential and Agenda Item: 8d. Ordinance Amendment – Animals in Commercial Districts (City File 17-038) 2 February 28, 2019 commercial districts. The standards adopted by other communities were reviewed to create standards that are appropriate for Corcoran. Chapter 81 of the City Code currently regulates bees as a farm animal and agricultural use and the Zoning Ordinance allows animals (as regulated by Chapter 81) in all of the residential zoning districts and the Transitional Rural Commercial District. However, there are not specific standards for beekeeping and the animal ordinance does not adequately address the unique characteristics of these animals. The ordinance does not allow animals in any commercial or industrial districts, except that Commercial Kennels are allowed as a principal use in the UR, RR and CR districts and as an accessory use to veterinary clinics and animal hospitals in the C-1 and C-2 districts. The desire expressed was to allow bees in all zoning districts. The Corcoran City Code identifies animals in two ways: FARM ANIMALS. Shall mean those animals commonly associated with a farm or performing work in an agricultural setting. Unless otherwise defined, such animals shall include members of the equestrian family (horses, mules), bovine family (cows, bulls), sheep, poultry (chicken, turkeys), fowl (ducks, geese), swine (including Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs), goats, bees, and other animals associated with a farm, ranch, or stable. AGRICULTURAL USE: The production, for sale, of livestock, dairy animals, dairy products, poultry, or poultry products, fur-bearing animals, horticultural or nursery stock, fruit, vegetables, forage, grains, timber, trees or bees and apiary products. Animals as defined in Chapter 81 of the City Code are allowed based on the size of the property, with a property size of one-half acre being the minimum size required to keep animals. The number of animals allowed on a property are computed based on the size of the property and are referred to as an Animal Unit Equivalent (AUE). Each animal kept on a property contributes to this unit depending on the species of animal. A fenced in area and shelter or stabling facility is required when keeping animals on a property. When the City Council reviewed the subcommittee recommendation, they expressed concerns about bee behavior and the necessary setbacks and screens to buffer bee keeping from adjacent properties. Staff reviewed the setbacks adopted in other communities with bee ordinances and believe that the proposed setbacks are appropriate. Large setbacks are not required because if proper fly away barriers are provided, they will ensure that the flight path of a bee is up and over any people on adjacent property. The draft ordinance has a 10-foot setback for hives, with a requirement for a fly away barrier to be provided if the hive is located within 25 feet of a property line. The draft ordinance does not allow hives in the front yard. These setbacks are consistent with accessory building setbacks. Section 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance requires 10-foot side and rear yard setbacks in the urban residential and non-residential zoning districts. In the UR and RR districts, the side yard setback is 20 feet and the rear yard setback is 15 feet. Ordinance Amendment – Animals in Commercial Districts (City File 17-038) 3 February 28, 2019 Included below is a graphic that depicts why screens are effective for bee keeping. Bee keeping is a common practice in residential areas and some commercial areas. The draft ordinance creates standards and allows bee keeping in all zoning districts. There are some potential issues associated with allowing bees in commercial districts: Noise, safety, appearance and space restrictions are all potential issues with allowing bees in commercial districts. These are all factors to consider given the proximity of adjacent properties in commercial districts. The draft ordinance includes standards for setbacks, screening and limits the number of colonies to address the potential issues with allowing bees. The University of Minnesota bee lab has a website with helpful information at https://www.beelab.umn.edu/. They provide a lot of information about bee keeping and honey bees. Honey bees are not aggressive by nature and will not sting while out foraging, only in defense of their hive. For most people, getting stung means some swelling and a little hurting and then it's over. Only 3% of the entire population will develop more severe reactions. If the Council or public is interested in bee keeping practices, staff notes that the Corcoran bee club is hosting an event in March and the public is welcome to attend. The draft bee ordinance attached outlines the recommended standards for the keeping of bees that would be included as part of the ordinance amendment. The ordinance amendment would include: • Including the bee ordinance as a new subsection in Section 81.12 of the City Code. • Amending the definition of “Farm Animals” in Section 81 of the City Code. • Amending the definition of “Agricultural Use” in Section 1020 of the City Code. • Incorporate beekeeping as a permitted use in all zoning districts. Ordinance Amendment – Animals in Commercial Districts (City File 17-038) 4 February 28, 2019 5. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following: a. Ordinance 2019-389 approving bee keeping as an allowed accessory use in all districts b. Resolution 2019-12 approving findings of fact for Ordinance amendment c. Summary Ordinance 2019-390 for publication Attachments a. Ordinance 2019-389 approving bee keeping as an allowed accessory use in all districts b. Resolution 2019-12 approving findings of fact for Ordinance amendment c. Summary Ordinance 2019-390 for publication d. Bee Article City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2019-389 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 81, CHAPTER 1020 AND CHAPTER 1040 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO BEE KEEPING (CITY FILE 17-038) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 81.01. “Definitions” (Animal Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: APIARY. The assembly of one or more managed colonies of bees at a single location. BEEKEEPER. A person who owns or has charge of one or more colonies of bees. BEEKEEPING EQUIPMENT. Anything used in the operation of an apiary, such as hive bodies, supers, frames, top and bottom boards and extractors. COLONY. An aggregate of bees consisting principally of workers and a developing or adult queen, and at times drones, brood, combs, and honey. FARM ANIMALS. Shall mean those animals commonly associated with a farm or performing work in an agricultural setting. Unless otherwise defined, such animals shall include members of the equestrian family (horses, mules), bovine family (cows, bulls), sheep, poultry (chicken, turkeys), fowl (ducks, geese), swine (including Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs), goats, bees, and other animals associated with a farm, ranch, or stable. HIVE. A manufactured receptacle inhabited by a colony. A hive that is not under management by a beekeeper but has been occupied by a swarm shall be deemed a hive under the control of the owner of the property on which the hive is located and is subject to the requirements of this Chapter. HONEY BEE. All life stages of the common domestic honey bee, apis mellifera. LOT. A contiguous parcel of land under common ownership. NUCLEUS. A colony temporarily maintained for swarm management, re-queening, re- establishing, or wintering a permanent colony, where honey supers are not maintained as a part of the nucleus hive. City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota SWARM. A compact cluster of bees located outside a hive and containing a queen, in the process of establishing a new hive. SECTION 2. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 81.12. “Bees” (Animal Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: 1. Location and Hive Density. a. Subject to the restrictions stated in this Chapter 81, beekeeping shall be a permitted use in all zoning districts within the City. b. No apiary shall occupy a front yard. For the purposes of this section, a corner lot is considered to have two front yards. c. Hives may be maintained on rooftops, subject to Section 2. d. African bee subspecies and Africanized hybrids are prohibited within the City. e. No person may keep an apiary on a lot less than one acre in size. No colonies may be maintained inside dwellings, garages, or any other structure requiring a building permit. f. On lots one acre or greater, the following maximum number of colonies may be kept: i. At least one acre but less than 2 ½ acres : 4 colonies ii. At least 2 ½ acres but less than 5 acres : 6 colonies iii. Greater than 5 acres : no restriction g. Compliance with the requirements of this Chapter shall be the obligation of the owner of any property on which an apiary is maintained, regardless whether the property owner owns or directly manages the apiary, beekeeping equipment or hives located on the owner’s property. h. Sale to the general public of products derived from beekeeping within the City shall be governed by applicable zoning standards, including ordinances regulating Home Occupations. i. Beekeepers maintaining hives on lots zoned commercial, industrial or public institutional shall post signage in an area open to the general public, identifying the location of the apiary on the lot. 2. Required Beekeeping Practices. All apiaries and persons keeping bees in the City shall comply with the following standards of practice: City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota a. Honeybee colonies shall be kept in hives with removable frames, which shall be kept in sound and usable condition. b. Each beekeeper shall ensure that so long as colonies remain active outside of the hive, a source of water is available on the apiary lot in close proximity to the colony. c. Each beekeeper shall ensure that no wax comb or other material that might encourage robbing by other bees are left exposed at or about the apiary. Such materials, once removed from the apiary, shall be stored in sealed containers, placed an insect-proof structure, or destroyed. d. For each colony permitted to be maintained under this chapter, there may also be maintained upon the same lot one nucleus colony in a hive structure not to exceed one standard nine and five-eighths (9 5/8) inch ten (10) frame hive body with no supers. e. Each beekeeper shall maintain beekeeping hives and equipment in good condition and if the beekeeper is not actively managing a colony within any hive maintained by the beekeeper, the beekeeper shall remove the hive from the apiary and store the unused hive in a manner to prevent occupation of the unused hive by a swarm. f. Setbacks and Barriers. i. Except as provided in this sub-section F, no hive shall be kept within ten (10) feet of any lot line. In each instance where a hive is kept less than twenty-five (25) feet from any lot line, the beekeeper shall establish and maintain between the hive and the lot line a flyway barrier at least six (6) feet in height. The flyway barrier shall be of a reasonably impervious nature so that honeybees will fly over rather than through the material to reach the colony. If a flyway barrier of dense vegetation is used, the initial planting may be four (4) feet in height, so long as the vegetation normally reaches six (6) feet in height or higher. The flyway barrier must continue parallel to the apiary lot line for ten (10) feet in either direction from the hive. ii. A ten (10) foot lot line setback and a flyway barrier are not required if the property adjoining the apiary lot line is either (a) an undeveloped parcel greater than one (1) acre, (b) agricultural or industrial, or (c) a wildlife management area or nature park land with no public trails or facilities within twenty-five (25) feet of the hive, and in the case of any of (a), (b), or (c) the hive entrances face away from the adjoining property. iii. A flyway barrier is not required if the hives are located on the roof of a structure containing at least one (1) full story and all hives are located not less than five (5) feet from the side of the structure. Rooftop hives remain subject to any screening requirements contained in applicable zoning standards. City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota SECTION 3. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 81.09. “Possession or Sale of Non-Domestic Animals” (Animal Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: In addition to the penalty provided in 81.130 for a violation of this section, any person found guilty of violating this section shall be liable to the city for all expenses, whether incurred by the city or advanced by the city, for the shelter, food, veterinary expenses, boarding and transportation of the seized non-domestic or dangerous animal, and such other expenses as may be required in the relocation or destruction of any such non-domestic animal. SECTION 4. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1020.020 “Definitions” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: AGRICULTURAL USE: The production, for sale, of livestock, dairy animals, dairy products, poultry, or poultry products, fur-bearing animals, horticultural or nursery stock, fruit, vegetables, forage, grains, timber, trees or bees and apiary products. SECTION 5. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1040.090 Subd. 3. “CR (Commercial Rural)” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: C. Keeping of Animals, subject to Chapter 81 (Animals) of the City Code. SECTION 6. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1040.100 Subd. 3. “C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial)” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: D. Keeping of Animals, subject to Chapter 81 (Animals) of the City Code SECTION 7. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1040.110 Subd. 3. “C-2 (Community Commercial)” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: E. Keeping of Animals, subject to Chapter 81 (Animals) of the City Code SECTION 8. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1040.120 Subd. 3. “BP (Business Park)” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: E. Keeping of Animals, subject to Chapter 81 (Animals) of the City Code SECTION 9. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1040.125 Subd. 3. “I-1 (Light Industrial)” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: C. Keeping of Animals, subject to Chapter 81 (Animals) of the City Code City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota DC. Retail sales related to the processing of product on site so long as it does not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the floor space of the principal building. ED. Tenant restaurants, cafeterias, and retail service limited to tenants of the building, provided that they be essentially limited to providing service to the users of the permitted use, and that no signs or other evidence of these uses are visible from the exterior of the building. SECTION 10. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1040.130 Subd. 3. “Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) District)” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: C. Keeping of Animals, subject to Chapter 81 (Animals) of the City Code DC. Outdoor seating within the public right of way or public open space for a permitted or conditional use, provided that: 1. A sidewalk area at least six feet (6') wide is maintained free of seating in the area. 2. An outdoor seating plan is prepared and approved by the City Council on the recommendation of the planning commission, on finding that the plan will not compromise public health, safety, or welfare. The plan may also include seasonal temporary landscaping and features such as planter boxes, hanging baskets, low partitions, roped off areas, and other approved elements. ED. Public open space plaza, square or other related uses. SECTION 11. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1040.135 Subd. 3. “General Mixed Use (GMU) District” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: D. Keeping of Animals, subject to Chapter 81 (Animals) of the City Code ED. Outdoor seating accessory to a restaurant. FE. Public open space plaza, square or other related uses. GF. Structured parking. SECTION 12. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1040.145 Subd. 3. “PI (Public/Institutional)” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: C. Keeping of Animals, subject to Chapter 81 (Animals) of the City Code. DC. Play and recreational facilities, including swimming pools and tennis City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota courts, for use of the property owner and guests. SECTION 13. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schulz, Alan Schulz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-12 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 81, CHAPTER 1020 AND CHAPTER 1040 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO BEE KEEPING (CITY FILE 17-038) WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to update the City Code to allow bee keeping as an accessory use in all zoning districts, as well as adding standards for operation; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards and City policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Bee Keeping Ordinance text amendment based upon the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment would be consistent with State law and the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code. 2. The amendment would amend the ordinance to allow bee keeping as an accessory use in all zoning districts. 3. The amendment would establish standards to ensure appropriate buffers for the keeping of bees. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schulz, Alan Schulz, Alan City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-12 Page 2 of 2 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-390 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2019-389 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 17-038) The text of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended to amend Chapter 81, Chapter 1020 and Chapter 1040 to allow bee keeping as an accessory use in all zoning districts, as well as adding standards for operation. A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schulz, Alan Schulz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10a. Council Meeting: February 28, 2019 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Wetland Conservation Act and LGU Responsibilities Action Required: Approval Summary: In late 2017 the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) voted to discontinue providing local government unit (LGU) services to the City of Corcoran after 2018. The timeline was later delayed and on February 13, 2019 the ECWMC approved a resolution officially transitioning services to Corcoran on March 1, 2019. The approval allowed the Chair of the ECWMC to work with Corcoran Commission member Ken Guenthner to finalize language. That resolution is attached to this report. Also attached to this report are two resolutions required for that transition. Additionally, it is recommended to adopt an ordinance specifically authorizing the city to recover costs expended to implement the Wetland Conservation Act. These documents were drafted by the City Attorney. Financial/Budget: The 2019 budget included an additional $10,000 for anticipated expenditures related to taking over the responsibilities. Actual costs will be determined as projects and issues come forward. Options: 1. Approve Resolution 2019-12; Resolution 2019-13, Ordinance 2019-386, and Summary Ordinance 2019-387 2. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Approve Resolution 2019-12; Resolution 2019-13, Ordinance 2019-386, and Summary Ordinance 2019-387 Council Action: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 2019-12; Resolution 2019-13, Ordinance 2019-386, and Summary Ordinance 2019-387 Attachments: 1. ECWMC Resolution 2019-01 2. Resolution 2019-12 3. Resolution 2019-13 4. Ordinance 2019-386 5. Summary Ordinance 2019-387 City of Corcoran February 28, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-12 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: ADMINISTRATION OF THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT WHEREAS, the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) requires local government units (LGUs) to implement the rules and regulations promulgated by the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) pertaining to wetland draining, filling and excavation; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules chapter 8420 have been adopted by BWSR in accordance with the rulemaking provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 14, for the purpose of implementing WCA; and WHEREAS, by Resolution 1993-124, the City of Corcoran designated the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission to server as its Local Government Unit and by Resolution 93-1208, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission accepted the City of Corcoran’s designation; and WHEREAS, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission has informed the City it intends to initiate termination of its role of local government unit due to staffing and operational constraints; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules 8420.0200, Subpart 1, Item E allows a county, city, or town to delegate implementation of chapter 8420 and the act to another governmental entity by the passage of resolutions by both parties; and WHEREAS, both parties must provide notice to BWSR, the Department of Natural Resources, and the Soil and Water Conservation District of the delegation, including a copy of the resolution and a description of the applicable geographic area, within 15 business days of adoption of the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) requires local government units (LGUs) to implement the rules and regulations promulgated by the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) pertaining to wetland draining, filling and excavation; and WHEREAS, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission has passed adopted resolution 2018-04 initiating termination of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission as the local government unit to administer the Wetland Conservation Act effective March 1, 2019. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the City of Corcoran hereby accepts the authority and administrative responsibility to implement WCA as the LGU within the legal boundaries of the City of Corcoran as of March 1, 2019 in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8420. City of Corcoran February 28, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-12 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jonathan Bottema, Jonathan Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran February 28, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-13 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: DELEGATING CERTAIN FUNCTIONS WITH REGARDS TO THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran has accepted the authority and administrative responsibility to implement the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) within the legal boundaries of the City of Corcoran in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8420; and WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran is authorized by Minnesota Administrative Rules Part 8420.0200, Subpart 2, Item C, to delegate certain functions with regard to implementation of WCA, including the authority to make decisions on applications, with its staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that decision-making authority for WCA applications is placed with the City Engineer or their designee effective March 1, 2019. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jonathan Bottema, Jonathan Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2019-386 1 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO RECOVER COSTS EXPENDED TO IMPLEMENT THE WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1991 THE CORCORAN CITY COUNCIL ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 53 established to read as follows. Chapter 53: Wetland Conservation Act Administration Section 1. Purpose Effective March 1, 2019, the City of Corcoran will assume all Local Government Unit (LGU) duties and be solely responsible for the implementation of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (the “Act”) within the City. Pursuant to 8420.0200, Subp. 2 of the Act, an LGU may charge reasonable fees to property owners or such owner’s designated responsible agent or representative to cover the implementation of the Act. The City desires to recover any such fees which go unpaid via a special assessment against the subject property. Section 2. Special Assessment of Unpaid Costs Charged to the Property Owner The City of Corcoran shall maintain the right to recover from the responsible property owner or that owner’s designated responsible agent or representative those costs incurred by the City in implementing the Act. Such costs shall be invoiced to the applicable property owners or such owner’s designated responsible agent or representative and those costs not timely paid by the property owner may be collected via a special assessment against the subject property pursuant to the process outlined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. . Section 3. Effective date This ordinance shall have full force and effect upon its passage and publication. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February, 2019. 2 ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran February 28, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2019-387 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2019-386 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO RECOVER COSTS EXPENDED TO IMPLEMENT THE WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1991 Ordinance 2019-386 establishes Chapter 53 of the Corcoran City Code which regulates Wetland Conservation Act Administration within the City of Corcoran. A printed copy of the complete ordinance is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February, 2019. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise– City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10b. Council Meeting: February 28, 2019 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Planning Commission Appointments Action Required: Approval Summary: Planning Commission members are appointed by the City Council on staggered terms. Two of the terms are set to expire at the end of February: • Dean Jacobs • Dorothy Theis Both Mr. Jacobs and Ms. Theis have submitted applications for re-appointment. Additionally, the City received an application from Mr. Vehrenkamp. The City Council interviewed all three candidates at a work session on February 14th. The Council must now appoint two of the applicants to the Planning Commission. After the interviews the Council briefly discussed the idea of adding an alternate position to the Planning Commission to serve when a regular member is absent. The discussion revolved around the need for any alternate to also abide by the regular member attendance guidelines which state “In any event any member fails to attend three consecutive meetings or 30 percent of those meetings held in a calendar year, a vacancy may be declared”. If the Council would like to allow alternate members an ordinance update would be required. There are pros and cons to having alternate members: Pros: • Additional member able to step in should a regular member be absent • Opportunity to create a “bench” for future appointments Cons: • Requires the alternate member to attend meetings where they are not a voting member • Potential to create confusion on how to handle any opinions from the alternate member when not a voting member Financial/Budget: Planning Commission members serve without compensation. Options: 1. Appoint two of the applicants to the Planning Commission 2. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Appoint two of the applicants to the Planning Commission. Page 2 Council Action: Consider a motion appoint two of the applicants to the Planning Commission. Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Application – Dean Jacobs 2. Planning Commission Application – Dorothy Theis 3. Planning Commission Application – Dean Vehrenkamp STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10c. Council Meeting: February 28, 2019 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Parks and Trails Commission Appointments Action Required: Approval Summary: Parks and Trails Commission members are appointed by the City Council on staggered three-year terms. Three of the terms are set to expire at the end of February: • Tom Anderson • Deb Regan • Chad Robran Mr. Anderson and Ms. Regan have submitted applications for re-appointment. Mr. Robran has recently moved from Corcoran and is not eligible for re-appointment. Appointing the two applicants will leave an open seat on the Parks and Trails Commission. Staff has advertised the opening and anticipates applications coming forward in the near future. Financial/Budget: Parks and Trails Commission members serve without compensation. Options: 1. Appoint Tom Anderson and Deb Regan to the Parks and Trails Commission for terms ending February 28, 2022 2. Decline the appointments Recommendation: Appoint Tom Anderson and Deb Regan to the Parks and Trails Commission for terms ending February 28, 2022 Council Action: Consider a motion appoint Tom Anderson and Deb Regan to the Parks and Trails Commission for terms ending February 28, 2022 Attachments: 1. Parks and Trails Commission Application – Tom Anderson 2. Parks and Trails Commission Application – Deb Regan STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10d. Council Meeting: February 28, 2019 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Hennepin County Corridor Planning Program Action Required: Approval Summary: Hennepin County funds various economic development programs designed to support businesses, promote economic development, create and retain jobs, and cultivate entrepreneurs. After reviewing the programs, staff believes that the Corridor Planning Program would be an appropriate funding mechanism for additional planning for the future town center. The Corridor Planning Programs specific goals are to enhance the tax base, stimulate economic development, strengthen and connect places and people, innovate and advance sustainability, and lead collaborative planning and implementation. Staff discussed the following three potential application items with Hennepin County staff: • Establishment the street network (route planning) • Establishment of the Town Square Park (siting and final planning) • Regional storm water planning Based on that discussion, planning for the Town Square Park was recommended for a funding application. The program funds up to $50,000 with a 10% local funding requirement. Staff is in the process of drafting the proposal and will send to the City Council prior to the meeting. Unfortunately the deadline for the program is also the day of the meeting and staff will need to send prior to Council approval. If the Council declines the opportunity, staff will withdraw the proposal. Financial/Budget: The program requires a 10% match which would be up to $5,000. These funds could be paid by the Park Dedication fund. Options: 1. Authorize staff to submit a proposal for the Corridor Planning Program for planning assistance for the Town Square Park. 2. Direct staff to withdraw the application. Recommendation: Authorize staff to submit a proposal for the Corridor Planning Program for planning assistance for the Town Square Park. Page 2 Council Action: Consider a motion authorize staff to submit a proposal for the Corridor Planning Program for planning assistance for the Town Square Park. Attachments: 1. Corridor Planning Program Supporting growing cities Corridor Planning Program Contact: Nate Hood Hennepin County Community Works nathaniel.hood@hennepin.us 612-596-9876 Corridor Planning Program 2019 call for proposals Deadline: February 28, 2019 2019 Community Works Corridor Planning Guidelines Hennepin County Community Works is offering financial and technical resources to municipalities and other local agencies for plans and studies that advance Community Works’ program goals (see page 2). Deadline: February 28, 2019 Eligibile Applicants: Municipal governments, park districts, watershed districts, public agencies . Award: Up to $50,000 Uses of Funds Examples of eligible planning activities include: Land use or small area planning. Infrastructure planning and conceptual designs, including pedestrian and bike connections and public realm improvements. Redevelopment feasibility or market analyses. Site specific projects will be considered. *Other types of plans and studies may be considered, provided the outcomes meet program goals. Ineligible activities include: Local government staff time Capital costs and equipment Resources Funding is available to support up to five planning projects in 2019, depending on available resources. Maximum award amount is $50,000. A monetary (not in-kind) match is expected, based on population under the local authority’s jurisdiction: 50% Population more than 40,000 25% Population more than 15,000 10% Population more than 5,000 0% Population 5,000 and less Consideration will be given if financial constraints affect ability to meet this match. Please note in application. 2019 Community Works Corridor Planning Page 2 Background The Hennepin County Community Works Program was established more than 20 years ago as a cross-jurisdictional program that addresses areas with declining tax base through coordinated public investments in corridor-scale infrastructure, natural systems, and redevelopment. The Community Works program has five primary goals: Enhance the tax base Stimulate economic development and job growth Strengthen and connect places and people Innovate and advance sustainability Lead collaborative planning and implementation Community Works is a leader in supporting partnerships in planning, redevelopment, and infrastructure investment and has funded both large, multi-phase infrastructure investments (such as the Midtown Greenway and Southwest LRT Community Works projects) and smaller one-time planning studies through the Corridor Planning program. Project Evaluation Applications will be evaluated on the extent to which the proposed activities: 1) advance one or more of the Community Works’ program goals (see above) 2) generate measureable, positive impacts commensurate with the public investment, and 3) reduce disparities and address equity. Examples of ways proposals may accomplish these goals are: creating and increasing access to high-quality jobs, housing affordable at a range of income levels, and transportation options promoting equitable development and economic inclusion, engaging local community and cultural organizations, demonstrating inclusive community engagement with historically disadvantaged and underrepresented groups, such as immigrant, African-American, Indigenous, LGBT, and differently-abled communities, improving community resilience, and promoting a more active, healthy community through pedestrian and bike planning. Application Process Application packet should include the following items: 2019 Community Works Corridor Planning Cover Page 2019 Community Works Corridor Planning Application (2 pages maximum) Map(s) of project area Letters or resolutions of support (recommended) 2019 Community Works Corridor Planning Page 3 Return the application materials via email to: Nate Hood Hennepin County Community Works Department E-MAIL: Nathaniel.hood@hennepin.us PHONE: 612-596-9876 Proposals are due by February 28. Potential applicants are strongly encouraged to review projects with Mr. Hood prior to application submittal. Proposals will be competitively reviewed, with notice of award anticipated by April. Projects must begin no later than July 1, 2019 and completed within 15 months. Applications will be reviewed by a committee consisting of Hennepin County Community Works staff and additional reviewers as deemed necessary to thoroughly evaluate applications. Funds are anticipated to be available for eligible expenditures incurred after final contracts are executed. Contracting and Reporting Hennepin County will work with local authorities to contract directly with consultants for the portion of the proposed work covered under the award. Awardee would contract separately for the portion of the work coverd by its funds. Hennepin County requires all awarded projects to include a final report summarizing the process, outcomes, and impacts of the completed work and a memoradoum detailing feedback on how to improve the Corridor Planning program and application process. Hennepin County is obligated to follow the Minnesota Data Practices Act, which means that applications will likely be public data after the evaluation and selection process. A statement identifying data as copyrighted or otherwise protected does not prevent public access to the data contained in the response if such data does not qualify as trade secret data. Hennepin County is not obligated to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of an application. Hennepin County reserves the right to accept or reject any or all applications received, to accept or reject any late applications, to request additional information as deemed necessary to review any application, to negotiate with all qualified proposers, to use any or all proposer ideas and/or approaches presented, or to cancel this application process, if it is in the best interest of Hennepin County to do so. Sound planning is the foundation of prosperity Our quality of life is shaped in part by the places we live, work and play, and how we move between them. As our population and economy continue to grow, smart urban planning is fundamental to the future success of our communities. Hennepin County’s Corridor Planning program provides cities and other agencies with resources for plans, studies or preliminary designs focused on public improvements or redevelopment around transportation corridors. Supporting growing cities Corridor Planning Program A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Administrative Offices Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 Phone: 763-420-8966 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 February 28, 2019 Nate Hood Hennepin County Community Works Department Mr. Hood, Please accept this application from the City of Corcoran for the Corridor Planning Program. Funding is requested to assist the City in planning a Town Square Park. The Town Square Park is an anchor and focal point of a new downtown for Corcoran which will be a gathering space for residents of Corcoran and bring services, amenities, and jobs to the City. Planning for a new downtown has taken place for many years however is now on the verge of becoming a reality. Municipal water and sewer service is extended through this area and development is taking place up to its eastern boundary. Even more exciting is that the City has been in discussions with a likely anchor for this downtown that would use approximately 20 acres of space, enhance the tax base, and bring over 100 jobs. A significant reason this potential anchor is interested is due to the unique Town Center design including the Town Square Park. The intention is to also include innovative stormwater management for the area which includes enhancing and highlighting a creek which meanders through this park. While the City of Corcoran has funds setup and processes available to us for infrastructure planning for streets, water, sewer, and stormwater, we do not have the ability to complete the special planning for this Town Square Park including site specific design, place making, streetscape design, and community engagement. The ability to hire a consultant to assist with these processes would be of great benefit. Attached to this letter outlining the project is a diagram of the new downtown which includes the Town Square Park. The City of Corcoran requests funding at the $50,000 level and will contribute the necessary 10 percent monetary match. The new downtown will provide a new style of gathering and community space that beckons back to times when vibrant downtowns were in every community. Corcoran is extremely intentional in A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Administrative Offices Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 Phone: 763-420-8966 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 its development and has taken the steps necessary to preserve this space to be something special. Years and years of thoughtful planning and persistence is now going to be paying dividends as this special place develops. The time is now to get this planning right and the Corridor Planning fund is just the assistance needed. Basic infrastructure is available, a plan has been developed, a very interested potential anchor is nearing a major investment, and the Town Square Park will be the spark plug to bring this overall plan together. If you have further questions about the project or request, please don’t hesitate to ask. This project is an excellent fit to meet the goals of the Corridor Planning Program which are: • Enhance the tax base • Stimulate economic development and job growth • Strengthen and connect places and people • Innovate and advance sustainability • Lead collaborative planning and implementation Sincerely, Brad Martens City Administrator Attachments: Town Center Overall Design Letter of Support from Corcoran City Council 26 | Town Center Mixed Use Apartments & Town Homes Single Family Town Center Legend Downtown Core Gateway Nodes 79th Place 79th Place 79th AvenueTown Center Park South Park North Park Main Street Ma i n S t r e e t 76th Avenue Floodplain Wetlands Larkin Road C i t y C e n t e r D r i v e Ci t y C e n t e r D r i v e Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 O a k L a n e M u l b e r r y L a n e La r c h L a n e Ma p l e H i l l R o a d Good Sheperd Church City Hall Not To Scale STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10e. Council Meeting: February 28, 2019 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Parks Planning Proposals Action Required: Approval Summary: In late 2018 the Parks and Trails Commission discussed the process for master planning park land in the City including the existing City Park and the adjacent newly acquired land from the Rockford School District. The Commission recommended hiring a consultant to assist with the planning which the Council supported. Staff requested and received proposals from Landform and Wenck for assistance in the master planning process which were reviewed by the Parks and Trails Commission at their February 19th meeting. Both proposals are attached to this report. The following is a brief summary of each proposal: • Landform o Includes the creation of two concepts; once concept is selected a site plan, grading plan, landscape plan, and budget would be created. o Good examples of past work which is similar in nature. o Cost is $23,000 for phase 1 deliverables • Wenck o Base proposal includes one concept, option for an additional concept. o Includes grading plan, landscape plan (confirmed via telephone call), and budget. o Good examples of past work which is similar in nature o Base cost of $9,500; recommend addition of option #1, option #2, and option #7 which brings total to $14,325 and is a comparable proposal outcome. Both proposals are well put together and show that Landform and Wenck Associates are able to complete the work. Due to the cost difference, the Parks and Trails Commission recommends approval of the Wenck Associates proposal as outlined above with options #1, #2, and #7 included. Financial/Budget: The Park Dedication Fund would be utilized to pay for the planning services. Options: 1. Authorize staff to proceed with the park planning proposal from Wenck Associates with options #1, #2, and #7; authorize the City Administrator to approve additional hours as necessary to complete phase 1 work. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Page 2 Recommendation: Authorize staff to proceed with the park planning proposal from Wenck Associates with options #1, #2, and #7; authorize the City Administrator to approve additional hours as necessary to complete phase 1 work. Council Action: Consider a motion authorize staff to proceed with the park planning proposal from Wenck Associates with options #1, #2, and #7; authorize the City Administrator to approve additional hours as necessary to complete phase 1 work. Attachments: 1. Landform Proposal 2. Wenck Associates Proposal LANDFORM LANDFORM From Site to Finish Tel: Web: 612-252-9070 landform.net 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401January 25, 2019 Attn: Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 55340 Corcoran, MN 55340 RE: Park Planning Assistance Dear Brad, Thank you for asking us to submit a proposal to provide parks planning and design assistance to the City of Corcoran. We’re excited by the opportunity to help the City fit the desired pieces together and generate the drawings and data that move the project towards implementation. We are pleased to submit this proposal which summarizes our understanding of the project, Landform’s team, associated fees and examples of similar recent work. Landform is committed to client service and the interdisciplinary fully-integrated site design process that has come to be our signature. Our studios are client-focused, each tailoring their design and production processes to meet the needs of their particular market, client or project type. Our team includes landscape architects, planners, urban designers, civil engineers and land surveyors. We offer what we call a SensiblyGreen® approach to your site design and development challenges from Site to Finish®. If you find this proposal meets your needs and expectations, we will provide you with a contract for services. Please call me at 612-638-0225 with any questions concerning this proposal or our services. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Kendra Lindahl, AICP LANDFORM, Principal Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. January 25, 2019 Prepared for: City of Corcoran Attn: Brad Martens 8200 County Road 55340 Corcoran, MN 55340 Prepared by: Landform Professional Services, LLC 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone: 612-638-0225 Email: klindahl@landform.net Parks Planning Assistance Corcoran, MN CORCORAN CITY PARK Table of Contents Project Understanding 5 Project Team 6 Project Approach 7 Project Schedule 10 Project Fee 11 Projects 12 Resumes 18 The City of Corcoran is asking for assistance to develop the master plan for City Park, which includes the 60-acre parcel west of the existing park, which the City recently purchased from the Rockford School District. We understand that existing conditions have been reviewed and desired park amenities defined by the Parks and Trails Commission. Landform will review the existing analysis provided by the City and generate two viable concepts from which one preferred plan can be chosen as the master plan. When a preferred plan is selected Landform will provide an overall illustrative site plan, any applicable analysis drawings, and a grading plan, landscape plan and line item budget. These items will move forward for approval and Landform will provide any edits necessary based on Commission feedback. 5 # # # # # ## 962 944 9 6 0 958 946 9 5 0 9 5 6 9 5 2 950 9 4 4 956 954 960 9 5 8 9 6 2 946 9 4 2 950 944 950 946 9 5 0 952 942 958 946 944 942 948 9 5 2 952 960 950 9 4 4 966 944 942 9 4 4 946942 964 946 9 4 4 9 5 0 9 5 8 9 6 2 960 944 9 6 2 946 9 4 6 952 9 5 8 952 9 5 4 9 4 4 964 950 942 9 6 0 9 4 2 948 9 5 6 954 9 6 2 9 5 6 956 9 5 4 958 9 4 2 9 5 4 9 6 2 9 5 6 954 9 5 2 9 48 960 958 9 5 0 9 5 6 950 9 5 8 950 948 952 948 948 9 5 6 960 958 9 4 6 9 5 4 9 5 6 9 5 2 950 9 4 4 9 4 4 954 95 2 954 9 4 6 CITY OF CORCORAN Preliminary Delineated Wetland Boundaries Figure 1 400 0 400200 Feet ±Path: L:\2294\100\mxd\CityParkWetlands.mxd Date: 8/3/2018 Time: 10:13:50 AM User: BolWD0186 2016 Aerial Photograph (Source: MN GEO) AUG 2018 Legend Investigated Parcels #Culverts Ditch LIDAR Preliminary Delineated Wetlands Project Understanding Kendra Lindahl Principal, AICP Emily Osthus Designer Jared Lee Designer, RLA Tom Meyer Designer, PE We’ve pulled together a project team that can address each component of the project with a high level of experience and expertise. Please find full resumes at the end of the proposal. Project Lead: Kendra Lindahl Kendra Lindahl is the Corcoran City Planner and will act as the project lead for Landform. She will provide planning expertise, project management duties for the Landform team and be the primary point of contact for City Staff. Primary Designers: Jared Lee and Emily Osthus Jared Lee is a registered Landscape Architect and has 18 years of experience working primarily on site planning for schools and designing athletic fields. His experience in this type of work provides a couple really critical points of proficiency for this project. The most obvious - he knows the tricks of the trade for designing and grading athletic fields, including how to best overlap activities for multi-purpose recreation space. Less obvious but also critical - he has expert knowledge on best practices for site circulation. On school property, like public parks, there is typically multi-modal traffic - bikes, buses, cars, scooters, feet - there are people of all ages and abilities, there are periods of peak use and congestion and periods of quiet, and of course the whole system must meet the highest standard for safety. Jared also has familiarity with parts of this project site. He was part of the team who designed baseball fields for the Rockford School District when they owned the land. Emily Osthus has over five years of experience as a designer primarily in urban design and parks planning. Primary design drivers for public parks are efficiency, on-going maintenance, and experiential components that are safe, comfortable, accessible, and inclusive. These drivers show up in the design outcomes in that they inform decision making - such as how amenities are sequenced, how parking is distributed, materiality and circulation systems, and landscaping and plant choices. Engineering Design: Tom Meyer Tom Meyer is a certified engineer and has 19 years of experience in civil and municipal engineering. He will provide design support as needed. Project Team 6 We’ve outlined our project approach by phase, with related tasks and deliverables. We anticipate being able to start the project as soon as the City is ready. We’ll kick off analysis with an information exchange. Landform will review the existing conditions and hear from the City thoughts about vision, key considerations, expectations for use and related logistics. From there we’ll launch into concepts designs and work our way to a final preferred plan and the related documents. Concept Design Analysis Finalize Documents PHASE 1 TASKS LAND FORM CITY STAFF 1 Kick-off meeting - discussion of project and existing site analysis X X 2 Review existing conditions / Analysis X 3 Generate two design concepts X 4 Discuss concepts / confirm analysis / choose preferred plan (or direction for preferred plan) X X 5 Generate preferred plan, grading plan, landscape plan, and draft line item budget X 6 Review for approval X X 7 Refine, finalize deliverable documents and budget X 8 Final documents to City staff X PHASE 1 DELIVERABLES LANDFORM Illustrative Site Plan X Grading Plan X Landscape Plan X Illustrative Images of key features (2)X 7 Project Approach Illustrative Site Plan Grading Plan Landscape PlanIllustrative Images of key features (2) Optional: If Useful Analysis Diagram Model Imagery Viewshed Studies Webber Park Master Plan MINNEAPOLIS PARK & RECREATION BOARD RECOMMENDED PLAN WEBBER PARK MASTER PLANKey Features Natural Edge Pool Aquatic Building Parking Lot - 75 Parking Spaces Soccer Field Basketball Court Existing Pool Demolition Pond Picnic Shelters Pavillion/Existing Library Shingle Creek Improvements Amphitheatre Entrance Feature Webber Parkway Improvements Fire Pit Pedestrian Trails Picnic Areas Performance Area Regeneration Facility Existing Statue Existing Playground Existing Webber Park Recreation Center Existing Tennis Courts Existing Parking Lot - 40 Parking Spaces Grand Rounds Bicycle Trail Lyndale Avenue Park Entrances * * * We b b e r P a r k w a y Webbe r P a r k w a y I-94 45th Avenue 44th Avenue Ly n d a l e A v e n u e 42nd Avenue Victory M e m o r i a l D r i v e 43rd Avenue Em e r s o n A v e n u e Du p o n t A v e n u e Co l f a x A v e n u e Br y a n t A v e n u e Al d r i c h A v e n u e Br y a n t A v e n u e Al d r i c h A v e n u e 44th Avenue 2117 WEST RIVER ROADMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55411TEL (612) 230-6400 SHEET NO. PROJECT NO. FILE NAME IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. BY DATE DATE REVISION REVIEW CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY TITLESHEET PROJECT SHEET INDEX REVISION HISTORY CERTIFICATION PROJECT MANAGER REVIEW / LANDFORM c Landform and Site to Finish are service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. OWNER MUNICIPALITY RGS 02.04.13 18 JUN 2013 MPB11003 61 2013 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my directsupervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy ofthis plan on file at Landform Professional Services Company offices and isavailable upon request. Robert G. Schunicht Registration No: NORTH 0 30 60 L102MPB03 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.2 PLANT SCHEDULE - BASE BID PLANT SCHEDULE - ALTERNATE #1 (SEE L1.4) PLANT SCHEDULE - REGENERATION ZONE 1 5 7 1 2 5 6 2 3 3 3 4 6 7 4 PHASE 1 DELIVERABLES | LANDFORM EXAMPLE IMAGES 8 Project Approach In addition to providing scaled drawings - the master plan, grading plan and landscape plan - we’ll also work in 3D, generating a model as part of the process and using it as a tool throughout. This is a simple task and cost effective for it’s return on information synthesis, site comprehension, and communication. We’ll use it extensively as an internal tool, but as it’s helpful, the model, or images from it can be shared. In analysis we’ll generate a quick topography model with our understanding of all the site constraints. This will very quickly give us a clearer understanding of the site and critical components such as scale, topography, and drainage. Through this portion of the project we’ll add information as needed or as questions arise. In design we’ll use the model again to quickly test and confirm design decisions on those same critical systems - topography, stormwater, and drainage - and to better understand key experiential components such as viewsheds (in, out, and through), site sequencing, wayfinding, scale, sun and shade. Refine and Finalize PHASE 2 TASKS LANDFORM 1 Provide support for presentation preparation as requested X 2 Provide edits where applicable on plans and budget per commission and staff feedback. X PHASE 2 DELIVERABLES LANDFORM Final plan documents for approval X Optional if useful: presentation support X 9 -Tools- Project Approach SCHEDULE MAR APR MAY JUN JUL 1 Kick-off meeting - discussion of project and existing site analysis 2 Review existing conditions / Analysis 3 Generate two design concepts 4 Discuss concepts / confirm analysis / choose preferred plan (or direction for preferred plan) 5 Generate preferred plan, grading plan, landscape plan, and draft line item budget 6 City Staff review documents for edits / approval 7 Refine, finalize deliverable documents and budget 8 Final documents to City staff for presentation 9 Staff presentation to Parks and Trails Commission 10 Provide edits per commission and staff feedback 11 Council Presentation and Approval * * * **May 21, 2019 May 14, 2019 Landform and City Staff Landform and City Staff June 13, 2019 / June 25, 2019 10 Project Schedule Project Fee Our fee schedule shows phase and general tasks and the estimated time required for each. If our plan does not meet your goals in terms of fees and expenses, we will work with you to make the adjustments needed to tailor our proposal to meet your needs. Rates are based on our approved Corcoran fee schedule. Additional services beyond the scope of this proposal or changes to the scope of schedule which would require additional meetings or deliverables will be billed at our customary hourly rates. Prior to performing any additional services, written authorization will be required. Phase 1 Bill Type Associated Fee Analysis Fixed Fee $5,000.00 Concept Design Hourly w Estimate $15,000.00 Finalize Deliverable Documents Hourly w Estimate $3,000.00 Phase 2 Bill Type Associated Fee Provide edits to plans based on Commission feedback Hourly w Estimate $2,000.00 Total $25,000.00 11 Projects 13 Webber Park Master Plan Minneapolis, MN for Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Landform® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Webber Park Master Plan Minneapolis, MN for Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Landform led the master planning process for Webber Park in North Minneapolis. Our work included an intensive community design process with a community survey, a multi-day design charrette and additional public meetings. We also developed a project advisory committee of park board staff and a technical advisory committee of other key stakeholders to gather feedback and provide design input. The current 22 acre park includes an outdoor swimming pool, wading pool, tennis courts, playing field, playground, pond, basketball court, and recreation center. Phase I of the master plan improvements includes a new aquatic facility. This facility is planned as the first natural swimming pond in the United States. It will include a constructed wetland treatment system rather than a typical chlorine treatment system. The new pool facility will have a natural pool edge with spaces for lap swimming, wading and open swimming. As part of the master planning process, we worked with the community to develop priorities for future improvements as funds become available. 2012 Master Plan completed 2015 Completion 14 Landform® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Ice Rink Turf multi-use Field Trail Connection Trail Connection Trail Connection wetlands wetlands ex i s t i n g s t r e a m Soccer Fields Entry North Parking North Parking South Entry South Parking West Playground Softball / Baseball existing stream Pamela Park Edina, MN for City of Edina This project included a master plan for park reconfiguration of recreational amenities, parking, and trails. Field improvements were designed for natural grass soccer fields, baseball and soft- ball fields, hockey rink, and an open skating area. A synthetic turf soccer field was added to the South side of the side. Much of this site lies within a floodplain. Because flooding and poor drainage can signifi- cantly reduce the life span of playfields, renovated fields were raised to be out of the 100-year floodplain. Open space around each field was slightly lowered to balance flooding storage. The new synthetic turf soccer field has underground drainage designed to both rapidly drain water from the surface, which aids in field maintenance and life-span, and also slow down the water before draining into the City stormwater system, which helps filter sediment and pollutants. 2015 Completion *Project completed by Jared Lee at prior association 15 Master plan Existing Conditions Concept Plan Options Analysis Landform designed a master park plan and provided a phasing plan and cost estimate for a new central, community park in Oak Grove. The park was to include new amenities as identified by stakeholders, including a pavilion, wetland boardwalks, skating pond, sledding hill, playground, restored prairie and sports fields. Landform’s design team worked with stakeholders to protect the site’s natural resources. Part of that effort was improving the existing wetlands and restoring a portion of prairie. These natural amenities were integrated with the new ones to provide a healthy and unique park experience. 2010 Plan Completion Landform® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Dunlop Property Master Park Plan Oak Grove, Minnesota for City of Oak Grove 16 Soccer Minnetonka High School Multi use field Football and Tennis Courts Trail Connection stormwater / wetlands stormwater / wetlands Trail Connection Softball Practice Baseball Veterans Field Minnetonka High School Minnetonka, MN for Minnetonka School District This project included renovat- ing existing baseball, softball, and football fields to improve playability and to build multi- functionality into fields. The challenges in this project were limited space, heavy clay topsoil, and heavy daily use by the school and community. A standout success is the efficiency of the site and design. Without expanding the footprint 5 practice fields were added and each game field was renovated. To fit everything in the site, a large turf baseball field was installed with two practice footballs fields overlaid. A removable fence changes the field from game-day baseball to practice football. New bleachers, dugout parking, and storage facilities were also created. By reworking the layout of the west and east side of the site, two additional softball fields and a practice soccer field was added. As a solution to the heavy clay soil and heavy daily use, synthetic turf was chosen for the baseball field and football field. Drain tile was installed under natural grass fields. Stormwater wasn’t particularly challenging on this site beyond best practices for field drainage. An outlet control device was modified to accommodate a slight change in drainage. 2009 Completion *Project completed by Jared Lee at prior association 17 Landform provided architecture, landscape architecture, civil engineering and septic design for a 3,150 square foot park shelter, play area, and other associated site improvements. The City was the recipient of a generous donation from the Hanifl Foundation for the design and construction of the project. The project incorporated many sustainable design elements, including: • rain barrels to reduce runoff and provide planter irrigation • native plants materials • low flow water fixtures • hi-efficiency heating system • user-controlled interior climate with multiple thermostats • natural ventilation with operable windows • natural daylighting with low- e glass in windows and skylights • sensor-controlled lighting • recycled-content building materials • durable building materials • low volatile organic compound (VOC) emitting materials 2011 Completion Hanifl Fields Athletic Park Shelter Hugo, Minnesota for the City of Hugo Landform® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Resumes 19 Ms. Lindahl leads the Planning & Urban Design Studio at Landform. Her experience with public and private sector clients spans 20 years. In that time, she has formed an expert sense of big- picture concepts and the details necessary for turning concepts into successful projects. She has also mastered creative, effective management skills in the increasingly complex approval process arena. Ms. Lindahl possesses a complete understanding of the municipal review and permitting process, allowing her to be a valuable addition to your development team. Her strengths include advanced writing skills, project management and effective presentation skills at public meetings and hearings. Master of Arts in Public Administration, Hamline University Bachelor of Arts, University of Minnesota-Morris American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Corcoran Design Guidelines, Corcoran, Minnesota New Richmond Ordinance Update, New Richmond, Wisconsin Webber Park Master Plan/Public Involvement, Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board, Minnesota Village Commons, Savage, Minnesota Inspiration, Bayport, Minnesota Radisson BLU at Mall of America, Bloomington, Minnesota The COR at Ramsey AUAR Update, Ramsey, Minnesota The COR at Ramsey, Ramsey, Minnesota Hugo Comprehensive Plan Update, Hugo, Minnesota Hanifl Fields Athletic Park Shelter, Hugo, Minnesota Dunlop Park, Oak Grove, Minnesota McDonald’s Restaurants, Multiple Midwest Locations Independence, Sun Valley, Idaho Highway 7 Corridor Study, Hutchinson, Minnesota Novus Master Plan - Trinity School, Eagan, Minnesota Village of Hardwood Creek, Lino Lakes, Minnesota Big Lake Downtown Framework Plan, Big Lake, Minnesota Hugo Downtown Redevelopment Plan and Design Guidelines, Hugo, Minnesota StoneBay, Orono, Minnesota Andover Clocktower Commons, Andover, Minnesota American Planning Association (APA) Minnesota Chapter of American Planning Association (MnAPA) Sensible Land Use Coalition (SLUC), Past President Economic Development Association of Minnesota (EDAM) Education Experience Registration Affiliations Landform® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Kendra Lindahl, AICP Principal 20 Jared is a creative and forward thinking designer with 18 years of experience working on site planning, master planning, site analysis, grading and drainage, and stormwater best management practices. He deftly blends technical skills with design thinking. This enables him to efficiently collaborate with diverse project teams and clients. While he’s worked on a wide variety of projects, Jared has extensive experience site planning for schools and designing athletic fields. His well-developed skills in these complex markets - circulation planning for schools, and grading and materials for athletic fields - add considerable value to all of Landform’s site design and master planning work. Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, North Dakota State University Bachelor of Science, Environmental Design, North Dakota State University RLA, Minnesota Design of Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans, Minnesota Avienda, Chanhassen, Minnesota Eagan City Hall – Eagan, Minnesota* Centerview Elementary School – Blaine, Minnesota* Vaughan Field Track & Field Improvements – Shakopee, Minnesota* Orono High School - Orono, Minnesota* Early Childhood Education Center – Spring Lake Park, Minnesota* Laketown Elementary School - Waconia, Minnesota* Byron Primary School – Byron, Minnesota* Lakeville North Tennis Courts – Lakeville, Minnesota* Jackson Elementary School – Shakopee, Minnesota* Shakopee High School – Shakopee, Minnesota* Eagle Creek Elementary School – Shakopee, Minnesota * Eastern Carver County School Multi-Use Dome – Chaska, Minnesota* Roosevelt Library – Minneapolis, Minnesota* Stillwater City Hall & Police Station – Stillwater, Minnesota* Trinity Evangelical Church – Lakeville, Minnesota* Crystal Lake Cemetery Mausoleum Plaza and Landscape Improvements – Minneapolis, Redtail Ridge Elementary School – Savage, Minnesota* Lakeville South High School – Lakeville, Minnesota* Individual experience gained at prior association* Education Experience Landform® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Registrations Certifications Jared Lee, RLA Designer Minnesota* 21 Ms. Osthus is a designer in our Planning & Urban Design Studio. She combines a background in environmental science with a passion for place making to create comfortable, healthy, sustainable design solutions at any scale. Ms. Osthus’ primary responsibilities involve design, master planning, and project visualization. Her professional experience includes large scale master planning, small scale site design, policy research, corridor planning, and campus planning. Master of Landscape Architecture, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Bachelor of Arts, St. Olaf College, Northfield, Minnesota Quarry Gateway Master Plan, Burnsville, MN Carver Parks Planning, Carver, Minnesota Park Nicollet Frauenshuh Healing Garden, St. Louis Park, Minnesota The Yards, Kansas City, Missouri Avienda, Chanhassen, Minnesota The Lakes at Stillwater, Stillwater, Minnesota Oak Grove TOD Feasibility Analysis, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota Ameresco Solar Site, Scandia, Minnesota Maple Grove Library, Maple Grove, Minnesota Corcoran Design Guidelines, Corcoran, Minnesota Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Rewrite, New Richmond, Wisconsin Union at Berkley Park, Kansas City, Missouri Kenilworth Corridor, Minneapolis, Minnesota* Minneapolis Public Realm Framework Analysis, Minneapolis, Minnesota* Lake Calhoun/Harriet Master Plan, Minneapolis, Minnesota* Mississippi River Regional Trail, Spring Lake Park Reserve, Minnesota* Lowry Ave Corridor Plan, Minneapolis, Minnesota* Target Field Station, Minneapolis, Minnesota* St. Olaf Framework Plan, Northfield, Minnesota* Kansas State University North Campus Corridor Master Plan, Manhattan Kansas* University of Tennessee Health Sciences, Memphis Tennessee* University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas* Architectural and Landscaping Ordinance Research, Eden Prairie, Minnesota* Linden Hills Small Area Plan, Minneapolis, Minnesota* Individual experience gained at prior association* Education: Experience: Emily Osthus Designer Landform® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 22 Mr. Meyer is a Project Lead for the Retail & Commercial Design Studio with 19 years experience in civil and municipal engineering. His expertise in stormwater management allows him to apply a SensiblyGreen® approach to any project. His experience in grading and project management throughout the permitting and review process provides the essential tools necessary for successful project development. Bachelor of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota The Preserve at Oak View, Andover, Minnesota Stellavise Solar Gardens, Multiple Minnesota Locations Avienda, Chanhassen, Minnesota Ostego Mixed Used, Otsego, Minnesota Metro Truck Equipment, Elk River, Minnesota Costco Business Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota Park Place, Corcoran, Minnesota The Lakes at Stillwater, Stillwater, Minnesota The Yards, Kansas City, Missouri Ecoplexus Solar Solutions, Multiple Minnesota Locations Black Forest Entertainment Complex, Albertville, Minnesota McDonald’s Restaurants, Multiple Midwest Locations Costco Wholesale Warehouse, Multiple Minnesota Locations Luther White Bear Acura Subaru, Waite Park, Minnesota Metro Transit Stormwater Inventory Study, Twin Cities Area, Minnesota* Upper Landing Urban Development Flood Response Plan, St. Paul, Minnesota* Miniapple Montessori School, Oakdale, Minnesota* Walgreens, Little Falls, Minnesota* Walgreens, Waite Park, Minnesota* Willow Apartments 8-Plex, Little Falls, Minnesota* Cherokee Restaurant Addition, Eagan, Minnesota* Shamrock Restaurant Off-Site Parking, St. Paul, Minnesota* 855 Rice St. Office Building Parking Lot Reconstruction, St. Paul, Minnesota* *Experience gained at prior association Education Experience Registration Site to Finish® and SensiblyGreen® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Tom Meyer, PE Project Lead PROPOSAL RESPONSE CITY OF CORCORAN, MN CITY PARK DESIGN ASSISTANCE 1800 PIONEER CREEK CENTER MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 PHONE: 763-479-4200 JANUARY 31, 2019 Wenck | Colorado | Georgia | Minnesota | North Dakota | Wyoming Toll Free 800-472-2232 Web wenck.com January 31, 2019 Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, Minnesota 55340 RE: City Park Design Assistance Proposal Mr. Martens: Wenck has prepared a proposal to assist the City of Corcoran with the preparation of a park design to begin to layout the future vision for the Corcoran Community Athletic Park. This plan will include locating all desired sports facilities, a draft grading plan and a budget cost estimate. Wenck is excited to be invited and considered for the City park project and is committed to delivering a high quality project on time. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Wenck understands that the City is looking for the conceptual design of a community athletic park and amenities with layouts for up to eight sports fields, sports dome, equipment areas, trail connections, multi-use building including bathroom facilities, concessions, warming house and storage, parking, stormwater conveyance, landscapes, sight lines, and natural areas. From discussions with the City, we understand that access to the park off of both County Road 10 and County Road 50 should be explored and include the estimated cost of turn lanes. We understand that the play structures are to be placed near the athletic fields, similar to Northside Park in St. Louis Park, with trail connections between all of the athletic fields. The draft grading plan is to be designed utilizing LiDAR topography. The City stated that they would like to show the residents progress in the planning and design of the park in 2019 and would like to start some construction efforts in 2020. CORCORAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION Wenck has created the proposal for a “Base Project” along with several options to consider to increase the detail of the final product, but still allow budget flexibility. Wenck will develop a concept “footprint” plan organizing the requested park features for discussion and review. The package will be presented to the City for review by the Parks and Trails Commission. Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran January 31, 2019 2 Base Project: “Footprint” Plan, Grading Plan and Budget Estimate Wenck will start by creating a base plan with LiDAR topo, aerial, wetland delineation, zoning overlays and existing features. Utilizing this plan, Wenck will create a draft landscape “footprint” design laying out the athletic fields, play structures, parking and multi-use building and access points linked by a series of trails. From this layout a draft grading plan will be created followed by a line item budget estimate for the features proposed. It is assumed the City will provide the required amount of parking spaces. The City will present the concepts to the Parks and Trails Commission, Planning Commission, and Council for review. Based upon the comments received, Wenck will adjust the plans as needed to yield a final plan as Phase 2 of the project. Base Project (Phase 1) Deliverables: • Draft “Footprint” graphic master plan (map) $6,000 • Draft Grading and City Utility Location Plan drafted in AutoCAD $3,500 and overlaid on the final “footprint” graphic master plan (map) • Line Item Budget Estimate Included • County Turn Lane Locations and Estimate Included Average hourly cost for additional services under Phase 2 $110 Note: all project and concept narrative will be illustrated on the plans or included as key note call outs. Optional Additional Services Wenck has presented additional services that we believe would enhance the end product Options 1 and 2 below would add an additional level of site understanding that we believe are crucial to creation of highest quality concept plan. Likewise, including additional survey information beyond that of LiDAR would expedite the process from concept to construction by utilizing the most accurate information from the onset and creating a grading plan from it. If the concepts are to be used in any meeting to present to the public, we would recommend renderings to explain the design to the widest audience possible. Below are the list of additional services Wenck believes are appropriate to present for this project: Option 1: Kickoff Meeting & Walkthrough with Pat Meister - $1,200 The creation of concepts first involves reviewing the goals, budgets, and limitations in an iterative fashion to create functional and affordable design. Wenck proposes to hold a kickoff meeting and site walkthrough with Pat Meister to review the 30+ years of experience maintaining parks facilities in the City. We would incorporate the City’s experience with future vision and combine it with our existing knowledge of the site’s limitations (existing wetland & stream) and review the adjacent properties for proposed connections. This would add another level of thoughtfulness to the design and future function of the park. Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran January 31, 2019 3 Option 2: A Second Alternative Concept - $2,875 Based on our experience working with the City of Corcoran on the Ravinia Park project, we developed two concept plans that were presented with different layouts fostering discussion. This exercise yields more input than a single concept and usually ends with a hybrid of ideas of both concepts. Option 3: Hybrid Drone/Conventional Topo Survey - $5,000/$2,500 Wenck has the ability to survey through both conventional methods or we can incorporate the use of drone technology to capture topography either for 60 acres or entire site snowmelt and prior to leaf out. The drone survey will also capture current aerial orthophotos which will be used as the base map imagery making it the most accurate depiction of the site. This becomes an economical way to accurately represent the site at a more affordable survey cost. Cost is broken up to allow more detail on the 60-acre only ($5K) if desired. The The City would select Option 3 or 4. Not both. Option 4: Conventional Topo Survey - $4,500/$4,500 Wenck has the capability to capture topographic information utilizing industry standard equipment able to generate highly accurate 1-foot contours either for 60 acres or entire site. This information is critical to gain and would be utilized for any construction grading plans. Cost is broken up to allow more detail on the 60-acre only ($4.5K) if desired. The City would select Option 4 or Option 3. Not both. Option 5: Utility Survey - $1,100 Capturing the utility information while the survey crew is on the site allows the site designers the most accurate information during the design process. This is especially beneficial when planning for sewer and water services for a proposed restroom and concession building. Option 6: Additional Grading Effort based on Option 3 or 4, Site Survey - $900 Utilizing the most accurate survey information to design the draft grading plan will reduce the amount of rework needed to go from concept to construction. However, it takes additional setup to integrate the survey information into the base files. Option 7: Color Rendering of Site Plan - $750 Color rendered site plans tell a more visually compelling story when being presented. People who are not accustomed to viewing design in plan view have an easier time visualizing the end product when color is added to differentiate park features. Option 8: Rendered Perspective of Concept - $1,090 Like the color rendered site plan, rendered perspectives allow more people to understand the proposed final design by showing how a space will feel once constructed. The objective of a rendering is to invite the viewer to see what a space will look like, feel like and what materials are proposed to be used in a photo realistic representation. Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran January 31, 2019 4 Corcoran Community Athletic Park Design Area Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran January 31, 2019 5 Option 9: Design of Natural Features – Scope Negotiated Wenck has extensive design of natural features, tree preservation, upland restoration and natural stream protection. This could be developed at City direction, but at this time Wenck assumes the City focus is on “footprints”, connectivity, constraints, phasing, and costs. FEATURED PROJECT EXAMPLE Wenck views the Corcoran Park most similar to the work on Delano Central Park. See Attachment A for plans and example documents. Central Park was constrained and highly used and developed over several years as funds became available and amenities were planned and executed. The City infrastructure (utilities, parking, stormwater) were also key components of the final outcome. A summary of Central Park includes the following components: Leadership –Commissions, Council, and Staff • Multi-year project and extensive planning • Youth organization input • Park budget considerations • Land Acquisition Use – City coordination, Youth Organizations and Citizens • Baseball, soccer and softball • Splash Pad • Playground • Connectivity - Trails and sidewalks Constraints and Infrastructure – Public Works and Engineering • Wetlands and floodplain • Parking and resident screening • Stormwater and treatment • Civil Plans • Irrigation • Bidding • Construction Management Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran January 31, 2019 6 Delano Central Park Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran January 31, 2019 7 SPLASH PAD & CONCESSION BUILDING (2018) Central Park in Delano has a large greenspace surrounded by multiple baseball fields and has long served as the center of the 4th of July celebration and hosted the State Baseball Tournament. In recent years, the City of Delano has made multiple improvements to the area within and surrounding their Central Park (See Attachment A for youth fields, parking, etc.). The most recent improvement was the construction of a community splash pad and concession building. Wenck staff worked with the City and coordinated the construction of these facilities. The splash pad is approximately 10,000 S.F. in size, consists of three separated age appropriate splash zones, is ADA accessible, and is one of the largest currently constructed in Minnesota. A 3,300 S.F. building was constructed directly adjacent to the splash pad to serve concessions during operations and may be rented out for private events. Improvements to the main ballfield have also been completed recently including regrading the ballfield to improve drainage and a complete replacement of the irrigation system. The City is currently replacing the ballfield lighting with an LED lighting system in preparation for the 2019 baseball season. With the increased usage and activity at Central Park, the City has reconstructed the existing gravel parking lot to a paved lot providing 90 parking spaces and is in the process of expanding the parking lot to provide an additional 130 parking spaces. Delano Splash Pad & Concession Building (2018) Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran January 31, 2019 8 ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE Task Description Delivery Date Contract Awarded February 15, 2019 Option 1 (if selected): Kickoff Meeting & Walkthrough with Pat Meister March 1, 2019 Option 3 (if selected): Hybrid Drone/Conventional Topo Survey Could delay the schedule by 2-4 weeks depending on snow melt. Option 4 (if selected): Conventional Topo Survey March 1, 2019 Phase 1 Draft "Footprint Plan" March 15, 2019 Option 2 (if selected): Second Alternative "Footprint Plan" March 15, 2019 Comments back from City/Commission April 5, 2019 Phase 1 Draft Grading Plan, Including Turn Lanes April 26, 2019 Line Item Budget Estimate April 26, 2019 Optional tasks are shown to illustrate their potential impacts on the timeline. If an optional task is not selected by the City, the schedule would advance accordingly. With our signatures below, we confirm that Wenck is available to develop the grading plan, landscape plan, and construction budget as outlined in the 11a.1 Quote Criteria received from the City. Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran January 31, 2019 9 COST ESTIMATE Our cost estimate (also provided previously by line item) is provided in Table 1 as a summary. This cost estimate is based on the scope described above and our experience with similar projects in the past. The optional additional services are listed individually with the associated price. We understand that the City of Corcoran’s primary objective is to create a community athletic park that is a local amenity to residents and is thoughtfully designed to maximize activities within the park. We will be your partner on the concept development team to fully understand the desire project objectives and features. On behalf of the 250+ employee-owners of Wenck, thank you for this opportunity to work with the City of Corcoran. Should you have any questions or need clarification of anything presented in the attached proposal, please do not hesitate to call Kent at 763-479-4209 or Lucius at 763-479-4254. Sincerely, Wenck Associates, Inc. Kent Torve, PE Lucius Jonett, PLA City Engineer / Principal Landscape Architect / Associate TABLE OF COSTS Table 1: “Menu” of Options and Costs Task Fee Base Project Task 1 Footprint Plan $ 6,000 Task 2 Grading and Utilities Plan $ 3,500 Base Project Total $ 9,500 Options Opt-1 $ 1,200 Opt-2 $ 2,875 Opt-3 $ 5K/$2.5K Opt-4 $4.5K/$4.5K Opt-5 $ 1,100 Opt-6 $ 900 Opt-7 $ 750 Opt-8 $ 1,090 Opt-9 $ NA ATTACHMENT A Featured Project: City of Delano Central Park Flood Berm Splash Pad High School Field Floodplain Wetlands Rehab Town Ball Field Playground Youth Field Youth Field Soccer Field (Fall) Parking Residential Screening (Pine Trees) Parking Trails and Sidewalks 456730 456717 Aspen Cir Wa l l a c e S t 4t h S t 2n d S t Maple Ave Park Ave 70th St SE 3rdSt N Ri v e r S t Wright County Surveyor Department - 2018 Aerial Photography 250 0 250125 Feet ±Path: L:\2294\00\Parks\mxd\Delano Example Park.mxd Date: 1/29/2019 Time: 9:32:28 PM User: shujc0243 City of Delano Central Park Splash Pad 3 r d S t r e e t N . City of Delano Central Park Youth Baseball and Softball Field Layouts ATTACHMENT B Selected Project Examples Involving Recreational Facilities Wenck Construction Management Division PAGE 4 PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Marshall, MN PROJECT/TYPE: Red Baron Arena/New Construction LOCATION: Marshall, MN SIZE: 78,200/SF; $16,352,089 REFERENCES: Darin Rahm, Director of Marshall Convention & Visitor Bureau 507- 829-5806 Wenck partnered with the City of Marshall to build the new 78,200 square-foot Red Barron Arena & Expo center which opened in May, 2016. The new facility features two indoor ice sheets, ten locker rooms, two meeting rooms, a club room, and capacity for up to 1,400 spectators. What makes the Red Baron Arena unique from similar ice arenas is the multi-use function of its main rink. The main rink can transform from an ice arena in winter, to an indoor convention and sports center in summer. To make the most of this space, Wenck installed a retractable bleacher system along the main rink, similar to what can be found in many gymnasiums. These bleachers can be retracted to maximize the floor space used for convention and indoor sports events during warm months, or extended during skating season to maximize seating capacity. With a fixed budget, it was critical that Wenck provide accurate cost information before final designs were completed and bid. Our team helped the City to make informed design options by providing line item costs for individual building features for their consideration. Since aesthetic was important to the Owner, they chose to install a thin-brick facade over exterior precast walls at a cost of approximately $260,000. The retractable bleachers noted above were installed at a premium of $50,000 compared fixed bleachers. To minimize up-front construction costs, the city elected to use fluorescent light fixtures in lieu of LED for a savings of $140,000. In December of 2016, WCCO news viewers voted the Red Barron Arena to be the “Best Hockey Rink in Minnesota”. A clip of the news story can be found at: http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2016/12/15/best-hockey-rink/ PAGE 5 PROJECT EXPERIENCE Eastern Carver County Schools PROJECT/TYPE: Victoria Recreation Center/Victoria Recreation Center LOCATION: Victoria, MN SIZE: 38,900/SF Building Addition; $6,550,000 REFERENCES: DeeDee Kahring, Director of Finance & Operations; 952-556-6261 Wenck served as Construction Manager for a single rink addition at the Victoria Recreation Center. The new rink opened to the public for the 2009/2010 Hockey season, and houses the Chanhassen High School team as well as a private school and local hockey association teams. The new rink features one sheet of ice with capacity for 514 spectators, eight (8) locker rooms, a mezzanine level club room, and space for the efficient addition of two meeting rooms in the future within the new mezzanine area. Parking capacity was also increased to account for the new rink. With initial estimates exceeding the available funds, Wenck performed significant Value Engineering. In order to preserve the building features and function, the new rink was designed with a sand base as opposed to concrete. This change resulted in a savings of approximately $100,000. Our team also evaluated the capacity of the existing rink’s refrigeration system and found that the new rink system could be downsized and combined with the existing system for a savings of approximately $50,000. Up-front savings were also developed by omitting two new classrooms at the mezzanine level, but installing mechanical and electrical supply lines to allow these spaces to be efficiently added in the future. PAGE 6 PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Minnetonka, MN PROJECT/TYPE: Williston Recreation Center/Addition and Renovation LOCATION: Minnetonka, MN SIZE: 8,200/SF Addition;18,200/SF Renovation; $4,483,378 REFERENCES: Kelly O’Dea, City of Minnetonka Recreation Director; 952-939-8360 Wenck provided Construction Management services for the Williston Fitness Center, a Minnetonka community fitness and recreation facility. The multi-phased project included the following: • New Entrance/Lobby Area • New Fitness Areas and Exercise Rooms • Area for Children Activities • Children’s Splash Pool • Renovation to Adult Lap Pool • Resurfacing and Improvements to Parking Lot, Sidewalks, and Curbs • New Parking Lot Lighting • ADA Accessible Public Restrooms and Locker Rooms • New Family Locker Room • Renovation of Men’s Locker Room • Renovation of Women’s Locker Room PAGE 7 PROJECT EXPERIENCE JORDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT # 717 PROJECT/TYPE: Jordan Middle School & CERC/Addition and Renovation LOCATION: Jordan, MN SIZE: 49,000/SF Additions, 119,000/SF Renovation; $34,564,000 REFERENCES: Mr. Matt Helgerson, Superintendent; 952-492-6200 Serving as Construction Manager, Wenck partnered with the Jordan Public School District to plan a successful bond referendum in 2014. Voters overwhelmingly supported the referendum to complete additions and renovations to the existing Jordan Middle School; creating a 21st century learning environment for students as well as a new Community Education and Recreation Center. Our Team worked with District staff over a six month period to develop phasing options that effectively met the district’s needs. We identified construction limits and completion dates associated with each phase to develop a bidding/procurement schedule unaffected by material lead times. Contracts were bid in three phases, or “Bid Packages”, allowing work to begin as final designs were being completed. We carefully monitored the design and budget, resulting in a final cost as-bid that was approximately $500,000 below budget. The original 1960s era building did not include a commons area, so the District’s vision involved creating a new “Heart” of the building. The new “Heart” features a 15-foot raised roof with storefront windows running from the main entrance into the center of the building to provide natural lighting in the commons area. The new three station gymnasium and Community Education and Recreation Center features a secure entrance for the general public to access during the school day. The Center amenities include rubberized multi-purpose flooring, an elevated walking track, large group meeting space, an open exercise room; and indoor tennis, volleyball and basketball amenities as well as a concessions area. Rosemount – Apple Valley – Eagan School District #196 PROJECT NAME: Apple Valley High School PROJECT LOCATION: Apple Valley, MN PROJECT SIZE: 14,500/SF Addition, 85,000/SF Remodel; $11,801,890 PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: August, 2018 Apple Valley High School was one of the larger, and perhaps the most complex of the 35 projects Wenck completed on behalf of the Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan School District over the past five years. The project combined the complexity of a phased project inside an occupied building, with an extremely aggressive summer schedule for completing significant portions of the 85,000/SF interior renovation. The first phase consisted of renovating the existing library and was completed as we began work on the new addition. Once the addition was completed and occupied, Wenck began work on a substantial portion of the 85,000/ SF renovation which was completed between May and August of 2018. The new addition houses a commons area and office space. Renovated areas included much of the building circulation space, classrooms, and a series of learning stairs in the center of the building. Safety, traffic planning, and building egress presented additional challenges. The project involved a large addition at the building’s main entrance which required Wenck to develop a separate Construction phase traffic and bus circulation plan as well as a temporary egress plan which was communicated to all building occupants and the Fire Marshall to ensure that staff and students could safely exit the building in the event of a fire. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Burnsville-Eagan-Savage School District #191 PROJECT NAME: Burnsville High School PROJECT TYPE: Addition and Renovation PROJECT LOCATION: Burnsville, MN PROJECT SIZE: 137,000/SF; $52,000,000 PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: August, 2016 The 13-month, $52,000,000 expansion to Burnsville High School addresses the growing academic needs of the community, and brings all grade 9th through12th grade students under one roof, providing a 21st century learning environment for real world learners. Collaboration, natural light, air purification, and sustainability initiatives are all built in to the new spaces at Burnsville High School, allowing learners to reach their full potential. The major expansion began with the conversion of an annex building to house new industrial technology classroom space. Once the former industrial arts space was vacated, work began immediately on three (3) simultaneous additions which included a new science wing, 9th grade classroom wing, and athletic facility expansion. Today, after overseeing an average of nearly $200,000 in construction per day for almost 13 consecutive months, our team is a matter of weeks from completing the project on-time and below budget. The tremendous planning, scheduling and coordination of work has led to a project that most others would not conceive as possible within the given time frame. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Prior Lake-Savage Area School District # 719 PROJECT NAME: Prior Lake High School PROJECT TYPE: Science and Classroom Addition PROJECT LOCATION: Savage, MN PROJECT SIZE: 33,000/SF Addition; $8,300,000 PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: August, 2014 We have been working with the Prior Lake-Savage Area School District to complete new construction, addition, and renovation projects for more than 18 years. In 2003 we were hired to build the Prior Lake High School, and recently we partnered with the District to build the 33,000/SF addition. Flexible space was a key component of the District’s plan for expansion. Classrooms were built with little or no fixed furniture. Every component of these new classrooms is movable and every occupied area within the new addition has access to natural lighting. Group work areas in corridors are used throughout the day for collaboration and docking stations are available allowing students to charge devices as they work in common areas. The three-story addition was built to match the layout of the existing High School, and the project design included two science labs, three general-purpose classrooms, a small office room on each level, a central resource area with a conference room as well as a technology/laptop cart storage room, and a custodial closet on each floor. The project also included a major kitchen expansion, security upgrades at all entrances, and significant exterior work. The project was completed within budget and on schedule. PROJECT EXPERIENCE ATTACHMENT C Other Wenck Natural Park Areas CITY OF PLYMOUTH – PLYMOUTH CREEK (2017) Combined the concepts presented in a previously completed Feasibility Report by others with our onsite investigations of the park and its users to design and construct to finalized design for a 2,700 foot reach of Plymouth Creek that flows through Plymouth Creek Park & Frisbee Disc Golf Course. Park users were degrading the creek and the vegetation on its banks while playing the course. The stabilization strategy included strategic tree removal and several bioengineered practices to stabilize the stream and enhance the experience for the golf course and the surrounding community by locating stream barbs and cross vanes near bridges, tees, and baskets to control flow paths, increase oxygenation and also create sensory experiences, such as the hearing of rippling water passing through the proposed boulder cross vanes. Wenck designed a boardwalk as part of the project to decrease vegetation trampling and erosion in low light areas of the disc golf course. The project was constructed in the winter and spring of 2018 and included 2 additional years of vegetation monitoring and maintenance. Owner: City of Plymouth Project Contact: Ben Scharenbroich Address: 3400 Plymouth Blvd, Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763.509.5527 Plymouth Creek streambank improvement project (2017) KANDIYOHI COUNTY – GAMES LAKE PARK (2016) Games Lake is a popular destination park for camping, day-use, swimming and fishing near New London, MN. An upcoming road reconstruct required the addition of a second entrance to the park and the County wanted to use the opportunity to develop a master plan for the park to address conflicting uses, parking and drainage issues, and desired improvements. Wenck partnered with the County to unify a vision for the Park that could be accomplished in multiple phases, ensuring the most efficient completion of each phase with confidence there would be no rework and wasted money to complete each phase of the plan. After completing the master plan, Wenck designed the first phase of the project, the second entrance and parking lot improvements. Owner: Kandiyohi County Project Contact: Jeremy Pfeifer – Assistant County Engineer Address: 1801 East Hwy 12 Willmar, MN 56201 Phone: 320.235.3266, ext. 4202 Games Lake Park Parking lot, new entrance, and stormwater improvements (2017) Games Lake Park Color Site Plan ATTACHMENT D Project Team 1 Our team members have designed municipal, residential and county parks, coordinated park projects within other infrastructure projects and have overseen construction of the parks. Together we will consider current and future uses for the park and plan around that to create the master plan for a community amenity. The team selected to serve the City of Corcoran on this project thoroughly understand park design projects. Kent Torve, City Engineer will provide time at no charge to coordinate the Corcoran Community Athletic Park projects. He brings experience from infrastructure work and equipment on parks in Delano and Loretto. Lucius Jonett, PLA Project Manager, Landscape Architect Mr. Jonett is a licensed landscape architecture that focuses on site design and construction with an emphasis on water resources. Projects range from creating outdoor classrooms, designing natural play areas to shaping municipal parks and monuments. His attention to detail and experience administering construction of his own design projects allows him to develop concepts and finalize designs with an understanding of what keeps projects in budget and allows for smooth construction. Previous park projects: • City of Lake Elmo – Municipal Landscape Architect (2018-Current) • Kandiyohi County o County Park System Master Plan (Current) o Diamond Lake Park New Entrance Construction (Current) o Games Lake Park New Entrance Construction (2017) • City of Eagan – 2019 Trail Improvements (Current) • City of Delano – Floodwall Park (2015) Seth Bossert, MLA Landscape Designer Mr. Bossert is a project designer with more than ten years of experience in developing creative design solutions and implementing projects with both the public and private sectors. He has a master’s in landscape architecture from the University of Minnesota – Twin Cities. Specialties include visual renderings of proposed environments, urban stormwater management, lake shore restoration and integrating design aesthetic into all team projects. His creativity allows him to balance form and function while solving complex design problems. Previous park projects: • City of Corcoran – Ravinia Park (2018) • City of Eagan – Trails Improvments (Current) • City of Plymouth – Plymouth Creek (2018) • City of Lakeville – Juno Trail Natural Resourse Management Plan (Current) • Kandiyohi County – County Parks Master Plan (Current) Diamond Lake Park Master Plan (2017) Games Lake Park Master Plan (2016) 2 Nick Wyers, EIT Civil Site Design Mr. Wyers has been with Wenck for three years as an engineer in training. He has experience in municipal design, private development design and utility inspection. His work focuses primarily with public sector clients in both public and private funded projects. Previous park projects: • City of Corcoran – Ravinia Park (2018) • City of Corcoran – Ravinia Development Phases 1-6 • City of Spring Park/Three Rivers Park District – Dakota Regional Trail Connection • Scott County – Cedar Lake Farms Regional Park • City of New Hope – Meadow Lake Park, Lions Park, Civic Center Skate Park, Holiday Park, 49th Ave Lighted Ballfields, Victory Park Ballfields, Fred Sims Park, & Terra Linda Park 1800 PIONEER CREEK CENTER MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 PHONE: 763-479-4200 WENCK.COM STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10f. Council Meeting: February 28, 2019 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Accepting a Donation Action Required: Approval Summary: Throughout the year the City receives donations for events as well as in-kind donations to the City. The City is required to accept donations via resolution. With thanks the City accepts donations from the Ebert Construction for lumber needed to build a Police K9 agility course for the Corcoran Police Department K9 program. Financial/Budget: N/A Council Action: Adopt Resolution 2019-15 Accepting a Donation to the City Of Corcoran Attachments: 1. Resolution 2019-15 Accepting a Donation to the City Of Corcoran City of Corcoran February 22, 2019 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2019-15 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION TO THE CITY OF CORCORAN WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran is authorized to accept donations of real or personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens, and is specifically authorized to accept gifts or bequests for the benefit of recreational services pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 471.17; and WHEREAS, the City received a donation of lumber needed to build a Police K9 agility course for the Corcoran Police Department; and WHEREAS, the donations will be used for K9 certification and ensures dogs are trained and prepared for obstacles faced while on patrol; and WHEREAS, the value of this donation exceeds $1,700 and helps tremendously to improve the Corcoran K9 program; and WHEREAS, without donations, the price of this equipment would have exceeded $5,000; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Corcoran acknowledges the generosity of the Ebert Construction and graciously accepts the donation. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jonathan Bottema, Jonathan Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 28th day of February, 2019. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: City Seal ____________________________________ Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 MEMORANDUM 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net DATE February 20, 2019 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications Projects/Comments in blue italics are new Project marked with an * have moved from active to approved The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1.2040 Corcoran Comprehensive Plan (City file 17-001). This year-long process was kicked off with a joint City Council/Commission work session on March 16th followed by three community open houses/events and several commission meetings and Council work sessions. The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed at their March 20th meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 5th and on April 26th the City Council approved the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for distribution to adjacent jurisdictions for comment. The adjacent jurisdictions have six months to review and comment and then Corcoran will send to the Metropolitan Council to review for compliance with regional systems. The final draft will be presented at the February 28th meeting where the Council is expected to approve for formal submission to the Metropolitan Council. 2.Animal Ordinance (city file 17-038). The City has received questions about allowing animals in commercial areas, specifically bees and chickens. The Council considered this item at their January 25th meeting and established a subcommittee to review the issues and bring back a recommendation to the City Council. Staff has the subcommittee recommendation on bees and is awaiting feedback on chickens. This item was reviewed by the Council on December 27, 2018 and a public hearing was held at the February 7th Planning Commission meeting. City Council action is expected on February 28th. 3.Southeast District Master Plan and Design Guidelines update (city file 18-012). The draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan anticipates significant changes to the transportation network that make it necessary to update this plan, which is adopted as Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance. At the April 26th meeting, the Council authorized staff to begin this work. Staff met with Hennepin County and is now drafting road alignments for incorporation into updated plan options. This item was discussed at the November 8th Council Work Session. The Council will review the revised draft at a February 28th work session. 4.Development Rights and OS&P ordinance updates (city file 18-014). One of the implementation strategies from the Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan was to consider amendments to the OS&P ordinance to better reflect City goals. The Council is also considering changes to the development rights program. Staff presented the City Council with a work plan and schedule at the May 24th meeting. The Council discussed at the October 11th Work Session and the January 24th Work Session. The Council directed staff to schedule a public hearing at the April 4th Planning Commission meeting and bring back to the April 25th Council meeting for action. Agenda Item 11a. MEMORANDUM 2 5. Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD and Rezoning for “Pheasant Ridge Second Addition”. (PID 0311923310003, 0311923430005, 0311923410002) (City File 18-029). The Council has reviewed and provided feedback to the applicant on a PUD sketch plan. This formal application for an OS&P subdivision is currently incomplete. Upon receipt of the missing items, staff will schedule this request for Council action. 6. Corcoran Land Holdings L.L.C. Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan at the SW corner of CR 19 and CR 10 (PID 18-119-23-12-0001) (City File 18-038). The request is currently incomplete, but if the missing information is received the item could be scheduled for Planning Commission and Council review in February. The item was withdrawn. 7. Meyer Lot Line Adjustment at 10740 Bechtold Road (City File 18-039). The application is currently incomplete. Additional right-of-way is required for the lot line adjustment and this item will be scheduled for Council action when deemed complete. 8. Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD for U.S. Home Corporation (dba Lennar) for “Ravinia 11th Addition” (PID 36-119-23-44-0012) (City File 18-040). Lennar has filed a plat for 15 lots at 6351 CR 101 (the Nichols property) and is proposing to the property to Ravinia. The landowner submitted a sketch plan for Council review in 2017. A public hearing was held on February 7th and City Council action is scheduled for February 28th. 9. Preliminary plat, final plat, and variances for “Dahlheimer Farms” on property located at 20702 County Road 50 (PID 22-119-23-41-0001) (City File 18-041). The Council approved a wetland waiver for a portion of this property in 2018. The applicants are proposing to subdivide the existing farm to create a 5-acre lot for the farmstead and the fields will be platted as an outlot. A public hearing was held on February 7th and City Council action is scheduled for February 28th. Also, there are several projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out: 1. Corcoran Business Park (City file 06-005). The City Council granted a one-year extension to the final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and is still working to close out this project. Staff has spoken to the applicant and will schedule a meeting when more information is available on the Loretto sewer project. 2. Hope Ministries Conditional Use Permit for Cemetery and Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easement at 19951 Oswald Farm Road (City file 12-002). Hope Ministries submitted a request for a conditional use permit to allow a cemetery west of the existing church. The application was approved by the City Council on March 22nd and site work had begun. The letter of credit for site improvements has been released, but we are holding the escrow pending completion of the approved landscaping. The applicant has indicated that they are considering a site plan amendment application to modify the approved plans. Staff met again with Pastor Brian Lother in July 2017 to discuss the outstanding issues and future expansion plans on the property. 3. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning for Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14-027). The City Council approved the request on December 11, 2014 and granted the applicant 2 years to apply for the final plat and final PUD development plan. Peachtree Partners did not buy the property, but a different developer could still proceed with the approved plan. On December 9, 2016, the applicant submitted a written request to extend the approvals for an additional year. Staff recommended that this request be reviewed by the City Council, but adequate time was not provided to place this on a Council agenda prior to expiration. Staff administratively approved an extension until February 28, 2017 so that this request for extension could be considered at the February 23, 2017 Council meeting. At that meeting, the City Council approved a one year extension. The City Council approved another one year extension at the January 25, 2018 meeting. The applicant is requesting another extension and the item is scheduled for Council review on February 28th. 4. Commercial Door Addition at 7670 Commerce Street (City file 15-010) The City received an application for approval of a building addition, which required a conditional use permit, interim use permit, variance and site plan approval. The project was reviewed at a public hearing at the June 4th Planning Commission meeting and was approved by the City Council on June 25th. The required MEMORANDUM 3 landscaping will be finalized and constructed after the downtown infrastructure project is completed. The City will release the remaining escrow when the planting is completed. 5. Private Drive Ordinance Amendment (City file 16-003). The City Council approved an ordinance amendment allowing private drives in the Rural Residential district, subject to certain conditions. However, after adoption the City Council directed staff to revisit this issue and consider an ordinance amendment to eliminate the requirement that private drives off paved roads must be paved. The City Council approved the amendment on May 26th. The Council also identified additional issues that should be reviewed and discussed at a future date. 6. Natural Resource Protection Ordinance (city file 18-010). The Council directed staff to look at options to preserve trees and natural resources to maintain the rural character of the community in both rural and urban areas. Staff presented for Council review at the May 24th meeting and the Council tabled this item. 7. Sketch Plan for “Edgewater of Corcoran” at 19220 County Road 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003 and 25-119-23-14-0002) (City file 18-018). Trek Development, Inc. has submitted a sketch plan for a residential development with a senior living continuum of care complex, apartment and single family homes. The Council reviewed the sketch plan at the May 24th meeting and indicated support. 8. Final Plat for “Rush Creek Run” at 7320 Rolling Hills Road (PID 28-119-23-22-0003) (city file 18-026). A request for final plat approval has been submitted but is currently incomplete. The preliminary plat for this project was approved on April 26th. This item was approved at the October 25th Council meeting. 9. Peter and Jean Dahlheimer request for Topography Exemption and Wetland Delineation Exemption at 20702 County Road 50 (PID 22-119-23-41-0001) (City File No. 18-036). The application was reviewed and approved by the City Council action on November 8th. 10. Kariniemi Preliminary Plat for two lots at 20801 Larkin Road. (PID 2711923410009) (City File 18-037). There was an error in the public hearing notice, so the Planning Commission opened the public hearing at the January 3rd Planning Commission meeting and continued it to February 7th. City Council approved the request on February 14th. City of Corcoran 2019 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 12. March 14, 2019 • Update on crime/drug action plan with proposed next steps • Resolution honoring Chad Robran for years of service on P&T Commission • Maintenance Operator Job Offer • Campaign Sign Enforcement Policy • Watershed Memo – tentative • Assessment Policy Amendment • City Hall Remodel – Review of Schematic Design • City Hall Remodel – Construction Management Oversight March 28, 2019 – Charter Commission prior to meeting • Planning Project Update • Corcoran land holdings rezoning, conditional use permit, site plan • Update on Crime/Drug action plan • Administrative Assistant Hire April 11, 2019 • Fire Department Annual Reports • 2019 Dust Control Program • Bring Your Own Device Policy • Award Bids for CSAH 101 & 100th Ave Turn Lane Improvements • Award Bids for 2019 Trunk Watermain Improvements • Rules of decorum for Council and Commission meetings April 25, 2019 • Planning Project Update • Code Compliance Quarterly Report • Financial Performance Report • RFP for financial management (move to later in year?) • Ravinia ROW plat and grading approvals • Public Facilities Authority – Credit Enhancement Program • Ravinia 12th Addition May 9, 2019 • Public Hearing 2019 Dust Control Project • Low cost paving options • Compost site options • Set Sale Resolution and Finance Plan – southeast waterloop