Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2018-05-10 Council Agenda Packet
*Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet by Door. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the website at www.ci.corcoran.mn.us. Corcoran City Council Agenda May 10, 2018 - 7:00pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Open Forum 5.Presentations a.2017 Audit – Justin Nilson, Abdo Eick & Meyers* 6.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of April 26, 2018 Council Meeting* b.Cancellation of Special Assessment and Certain Fees – 20175 County Road 50* 7.Claims as Presented a.Escrow Claims (Fund #500)* b.All Other Financial Claims* 8.Staff Reports / Memos / Commissions a.Commission Representatives* 9.Planning Business a.Consideration of EAW - Encore (18-004)* 10.Unfinished Business 11.New Business a.Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A* b.Interfund Transfer* c.Public Hearing – 2018 Dust Control Project* d.2018 Pavement Overlay Program*--Accept plans/specs, authorize bids 12.2018 Council Schedule* 13.Council Liaison Calendar Planning Commission 5/3/18 6/7/18 7/5/18 8/2/18 9/6/18 Cancelled Dejewski LaFave Keefe Thomas Parks and Trails Commission 5/15/18 6/19/18 7/17/18 8/21/18 9/18/18 Keefe Available Bottema Available LaFave 14.Adjournment 5a . CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 2018 - 7:00pm The Corcoran City Council met on April 26, 2018 at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were Mayor Thomas, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Dejewski, Councilor Keefe, and Councilor LaFave. Also present were City Administrator Martens, Public Works Director Mattson, and City Planner Lindahl. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor Thomas called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Thomas invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Martens noted two added claims and a resignation notice of a maintenance operator to be added to 11b. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Dejewski to approve the agenda as amended. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 4.Open Forum Roger Masica, 23405 County Road 30, discussed item 6d. site plan and variance for 9520 County Road 19 and requested this item be removed from the consent agenda. He shared that he is an adjacent land owner to the property and had concerns he would like to discuss with the owner of the property regarding parking and bus storage. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by LaFave to remove item 6d. from the consent agenda. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 5.Presentations No persons were present to speak. 6.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of April 12, 2018 Council Meeting b.Draft Minutes of April 12, 2018 Work Session c.Truck Safety Seminar Resolution d.Site Plan and Variance for 9520 County Road 19 (18-008) e.Conditional Use Permit for High 5 Companies, Inc. at 7525 Commerce Street (18-006) MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by LaFave to approve the consent agenda consisting of items 6a, 6b, 6c, and 6e. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 7.Claims as Presented a. Escrow Claims (Fund #500) MOTION: made by LaFave, seconded by Keefe to approve escrow claims as presented. Agenda Item 6a. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) b. All Other Financial Claims MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Bottema to approve all other claims as presented. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 8. Staff Reports / Memos/Commissions a. Commissioner Representatives The Council acknowledged Parks and Trails Commission Representative Tom Anderson and Planning Commission Representative Alan Schultz. b. Planning Project Update c. Code Compliance Report- 1st Quarter 2018 9. Planning Business a. Special Home Occupation for Patrick Matter at 19320 Mystique Drive (18-009) The Council heard concerns from residents regarding the Special Home Occupation at 19320 Mystique Drive. Shaun Wilson, 9400 Cherry Lane, addressed the Council and shared concern about the type of shop that will open at this location. He also expressed safety concerns about children and elderly residents that live in the neighborhood, as well as numerous blind corners coming in contact with those test driving motorcycles. Sue Hanson, 9405 Cherry Lane, addressed the Council and repeated concerns about safety. Nancy Wold, 9027 Brandywine Road, addressed the council and expressed concern about noise and the number of motorcycles that would be added to the neighborhood. She shared that it is a quiet area with limited traffic and would like it to remain that way. City Planner Lindahl explained the applicant is requesting approval for a Special Home Occupation for sale of motorcycles and vehicles, as well as some repair. She shared that notices were sent to affected properties and the City received 9 letters from 8 properties that were then sent to the Council for action. The most common cited concerns were traffic and noise. The City’s discretion is limited to whether the proposed request meets the standards in the ordinance. If the request meets those standards, the City must approve the request. The property will primarily be used to sell vehicles online, but will also do some repairs on-site. Staff has reviewed the Home Occupation standards and the applicant complies, is consistent with other auto home occupations, and is anticipating less than 3 business trips per day while the code allows for 10 business trips per day. Staff has included provisions in the draft resolution to respond to neighborhood concerns—specifically no outside storage allowed, repairs must occur within the building, no more than 10 business trips per day, and must comply with MPCA noise rules. The Council stated that it would like it to be more restrictive than 10 trips per day. The applicant responded that most sales will occur online and he does not intend to repair autos at this business. The applicant noted that the Special Home Occupation was largely for needing a dealer’s license to purchase automobiles at auctions and repairs can be done at another location. The applicant also stated that he would not test motorcycles on neighborhood roads and would likely not purchase more than 1-2 motorcycles per year. The Council inquired if it would be acceptable to limit to 10 trips per week and ask vehicles coming in to this property to travel on County Road 101. The Council also noted that a Special Home occupation is a temporary permit that gets renewed every 3 years; therefore, if there are problems it can be rescinded. The Council also asked the applicant to explain the hours of operation. The applicant responded that he would be taking business from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. The Council inquired what the process would be if there were to be an issue. City Planner Lindahl explained that the Code Compliance Official would inspect for violation and document. The applicant would then get a chance to correct the violations and if there were a series of problems that happened at the end of the 3-year period the Council can decide if they need to add more conditions and renew or remove the Special Use Permit. Council suggested changing the conditions for the Special Home Occupation to no more than 10 business trips per week and restricting access to only County Road 101. MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Bottema to approve Special Home Occupation for Patrick Matter at 19320 Mystique Drive with amendments to item 6 and item 7. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) b. Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Encore (18-007) City Planner Lindahl gave a verbal presentation on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Encore. She explained that the applicant is seeking to reclassify 75.14 acres of Mixed Residential to Low Density Residential, 40.22 of High Density Residential to Low Density Residential, 4.01 acres of Light Industrial to Low Density Residential, and 20.13 acres of Commercial to Low Density Residential. City Planner Lindahl clarified that a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is a policy decision for the city, not a development review or approval. The Commission held a public hearing at their April 5th meeting and four people spoke and shared their questions and concerns. The Commission voted 4-1 to recommend approval. The nay vote had concerns over eliminating the High Density Residential opportunities. On February 22nd, the Council reviewed a PUD sketch plan, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet, and indicated support for the concept. The applicant is currently working to address concerns. Under the current land use designation, this area had potential for 800 residential units and this change would result in approximately 400. Dennis Stieg, 19320 Stieg Road, addressed the Council and shared concerns about losing commercial property and the resulting tax base. He shared that he consulted with the City Assessor and found that commercial properties pay over two times as much taxes as a residential property. He reminded the Council that the City of Corcoran is always looking for commercial opportunities and this area would be prime due to access to the freeway, the County Road 101 exchange that is planned, and the County Road 30 extension off of MN-610. Paul Heuer from Pulte Homes, 7500 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, MN, addressed the Council and gave a verbal presentation on the planned development. He shared that after discussions, it was decided to brand this development as Del Webb. He addressed the amount of Commercial area that will be converted and shared that after analysis it would result to approximately 11.5 acres. The Comprehensive Plan states 110 gross acres of Commercial, which would roughly result in approximately 10%. He also addressed the 4 acres of industrial that would be converted but highlighted that the 4 acres would unlikely be developed as it is a peninsula surrounded by wetlands and woods and could only be accessed through a residential neighborhood. Heuer also shared some of the amenities this development would provide, including: a 8,000 square foot clubhouse with a fitness center, locker rooms, multipurpose rooms, a large community room, a kitchen, and a patio; an amenity center with an outdoor pool, pickle ball courts, bocce ball courts, a tennis court, a fire pit, and gathering areas; and an arrival drive with a heavily landscaped corridor, a variety of tree species, coniferous buffers, and view corridors to wetlands/open space. City Planner Lindahl also noted a typo on page 2 of the draft resolution from “demand” to “supply”. The Council inquired about adding meander to the roads and Heuer shared that they are working with staff and trying to find the right balance. The Council inquired about the 8,000 square foot clubhouse and asked if that was solely for residents or could be rented out by other residents. Heuer noted that it would be owned by the neighborhood association and was designed for residents at the new development but would be up to the discretion of the neighborhood association for future use. The Council expressed reluctance in reclassifying Commercial property but noted difficulties in attracting commercial use due to the surrounding wetlands and difficulty in access. The Council also inquired about the maximum number of homes allowed on this property. City Planner Lindahl explained that if approved, the maximum would be 5 units per acre. Currently the development is in range for 387-420 homes and the final plat will formalize the number. The Council inquired about the proposed parking lots and if there was a bike trail. Heuer responded there will be two parking lots next to the open space woods and public park on the north side and that there will be bike paths. The Council inquired about the types of comments and concerns that were shared at the Commission’s public hearing. City Planner Lindahl noted that comments revolved around changing land use, concerns about losing commercial land, and access inquiries. MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Bottema to approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for property located at 9975 County Road 101, with adjustments due to typo. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) c. Preliminary Plat for Rush Creek Run (18-001) City Planner Lindahl gave a verbal presentation on the Preliminary Plat for Rush Creek Run. She explained that the applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat for 6 new lots on 60 acres of land. The property is zoned as Rural Residential and portions of the property are in the FEMA floodplain. The Parks and Trails Commission voted unanimously to recommend dedication of a 20-foot trail easement and cash in-lieu of land. The Commission did not recommend the horse trail dedication and recommended removal of the planned horse trail from the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant submitted revised plans that show these changes. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a horse trail along Rolling Hills Road and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows the updated trail alignment with the 20-foot trail easement plus park dedication cash in-lieu for the remainder. Applicant representative Brian Whisney addressed the Council and requested continued deference for paying the Special Assessment fee until the lots are sold or developed. The total of the Special Assessments from road improvements is $32,000. City Administrator Martens noted that from a staff perspective they are recommending the fee comes due with the development due to the intent of the previously deferred assessment. The intent when deference was given was to have it deferred until the land was divided into different sections. The Council inquired whether the property was still accruing interest. City Planner Lindahl explained that the assessment was applied in 2001 and accrued interest for 10 years, in which the interest is then maximized and no longer continues accruing. She also explained the triggers for payment from the assessment agreement including if the land is vacant when it develops, when someone subdivides the property, or when the property is sold. The Council then noted that the applicant can defer payment for another year as long as the plat is not filed. MOTION: made by LaFave, seconded by Dejewski to approve the preliminary plat to create 6 lots from an existing 59.95-acre parcel. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) d. 2040 Comprehensive Plan (17-001) City Planner Lindahl gave a verbal presentation on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. She explained that the Comprehensive Plan is the policy document and vision for development for the City of Corcoran that reflects the community’s social and economic values. These values translate into the type of land use the City desires and programs regarding economic development, housing, parks, transportation, and other key areas. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and voting unanimously to recommend approval. One resident spoke at the hearing and two residents submitted written requests. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Park and Trails Commission recommendations but no other changes. For the Comprehensive Plan process, there have been: 1 joint Council/Commission kick-off meeting, 8 Council meetings, 2 Planning Commission meetings, 3 open houses/public outreach events, and 2 surveys. Key land use changes were: the city’s population forecasts being reduced 35% from an estimated 17,600 to 11,400 in 2040; updated SE District Land Use per the 2016 Plan; Business Park designation near County Road 30/County Road 116 shifted to the NE corner; an additional 932 acres of land added to MUSA in SW Corcoran; and the land behind the existing downtown industrial area changed from Residential to Industrial. Key parks changes were: a plan for trails on or adjacent to all collector roads; the horse trail location shifted south and as a future loop near Lake Jubert; and a new community park (ASA) near Old Settlers Road. Recommendations from the Parks and Trails Commission: remove the horse trail, move the OSP from the east side of Lake Jubert to the west, and move the trail that runs along the east side of Bass Lake Crossing South adjacent to the Lions’ park property with a crossing along the wetlands. Key transportation changes were: County Road 50 alignment will not change as previously planned; County Road 10 alignment east of County Road 116 will not change as previously planned; and realignment of the Maple Hill/Larkin Road/County Road 10 intersection is planned. The City received two new resident requests: a request to move staging up to the 2nd phase by Dahlheimer and a request to retain Medium Density Residential by Schutte. The Commission recommended no change. Staff recommends adoption of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Approval authorizes staff to make final edits and distribute to adjacent jurisdictions for review. There will then be a 6 month review per iod, after which it can be adopted and sent to the Metropolitan Council. The Council expressed its satisfaction with the plan. The Council inquired if the horse trail were to be removed how trails would be impacted in the area. City Administrator Martens explained that there is an off-road trail that parallels the previously planned horse trail which was incompatible because it was too close. Parks and Trails Commission Representative Tom Anderson explained that the horse and pedestrian trail need to be far away because having walkers and cyclists near a horse trail is not compatible. He also explained that horse owners said they would not use the planned trail because it was not long enough and crossed traffic. The Council inquired how long the Comprehensive Plan has taken up until this point. City Planner Lindahl noted that staff began working on it May 2017. MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Bottema approving a Comprehensive Plan update for the City of Corcoran. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 6d. Site Plan and Variance for 9520 County Road 19 City Planner Lindahl presented on the site plan and variance for 9520 County Road 19. The applicant is requesting approval of a site plan and variance for a building addition to the existing accessory building and a parking area for buses on approximately 28.73 acres. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval. There was no one present at the public hearing to speak. City Planner Lindahl explained that there has always been a tree gap along two parts of the property facing north due to existing power line easement and wetlands. There is currently a gap from where the Masica property is that can view the bus storage. Suggestions for landscaping, if the Council proposes to do so, is at the edge of the wetland buffer or on the north side along the common lot line. The Council may approve Resolution 2018-34 as drafted, or approve Resolution 2018-34 with a new condition for landscaping. Doug Doboszenski, the applicant, address the Council and spoke on behalf of the plans. He explained that the wetlands tie into the power line and that they had no control over where the power lines were placed or what trees were cut down for that purpose. Owner of adjacent property Roger Masica expressed desire to have trees or a fence planted between the properties to block views of bus storage and equipment. Doug Doboszenski explained that the City of Corcoran requested they move to the current area from a prior area where they were operating. He explained that he bought 30 of the 50 acres that was zoned for this type of business and could only put hard surface on 50% due to city ordinance. He also shared that there was a public hearing at the time and there were decisions on how many trees to cut down. The Council inquired if it was acceptable for there to be material storage within the power line easement. Doboszenski responded that the decision is up to the easement holders and that they have a letter from the power company that outlines height restrictions but ultimately approves it. City Planner Lindahl clarified that the original approval in 2006 showed the building addition but did not approve the addition. She also noted that the approval clearly states where storage can go and the City did not approve storage in that location. MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Bottema to approve site plan amendment and variance for 9520 County Road 19. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Keefe Nay: LaFave (Motion carried 4:1) e. Proposal to Update Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance (18-012) City Planner Lindahl gave a verbal presentation on updating Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. The primary effort is to relook at the map and define where the downtown center and core is and how that might change with the conditions of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff developed a few options and are suggesting to work directly with the Council and meet with staff from Hennepin County to make sure the City and County’s plans align. The focus is to update the transportation plan first, then update the land use pieces, then update the GIS, text, and graphics of the document itself. She noted that it would be an approximate 6 month process and there has been no public process yet. One option staff outlined was to establish a street alignment west of County Road 116 and execute a more detailed concept plan and site plan. Another option is to generate 3-D models of the plans to give the project a sense of scale and higher detail. The Council noted that this process was necessary as renderings help people understand and digest concept plans. The Council also stated concerns with spending money moving forward on these items without clear direction for the future and suggested having work sessions prior to spending money executing the items. City Administrator Martens stated that staff sought clarity and direction through what was outlined and discussed in the Comprehensive Plan process. City Planner Lindahl added that another source of direction was discussions during the work session in August. City Administrator Martens noted that it is useful to get as much information as possible so that if conversations need to be had with businesses in the affected area they can happen as soon as possible. The Council inquired if the items listed were to be done in order or if the Council can choose which they find important. City Planner Lindahl responded that the items are suggestions that the Council can choose which to implement. The Council clarified that the purpose is to consult with someone for their expertise to help develop a plan for how the downtown will look east and west of County Road 116 and that the Council will ultimately have the final authority on what will be executed. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Keefe to execute Tasks 1, 2, and three as well as Option 1 of the proposal to update Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance evaluating options west of County Road 116 including establishing an ultimate street alignment, developing an illustrative transportation plan, developing a master concept plan for the area generally located west of 116 and east of Cain Road between County Road 50 and Meister Road, and refine the concept plan as needed after meeting with City Council for review. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 10. Unfinished Business e. Fir Lane Turn Lane Improvement Project Public Works Director Mattson gave a presentation on the Fir Lane Turn Lane Improvement Project. He stated that intersection improvements along Bass Lake Road are required as a result of two developments moving forward in 2018: Bass Lake Crossing and Bass Lake Crossing South. The project will result in right, left, and through lanes in both eastbound and westbound directions at the new street Fir Lane. Hennepin County led the ultimate design process with the westbound travel lane shifting north and the dedicated left turn lane at Larkin Road where there is currently a bypass lane. A bid opening was held on April 17th and the City received 6 bids. The lowest bidder was Northwest Asphalt, Inc. at $326,528.05. The anticipated schedule for construction is June and July with substantial completion expected August 1st. Staff is recommending the award to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. contingent upon receipt of cash escrow funds. Public Works Director Mattson noted that Northwest Asphalt, Inc. was the contractor who did the turn lanes for Hackamore Road and County Road 101. MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by LaFave to award CSAH 10 & Fir Lane Turn Lane Improvements to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. for $326,528.05 contingent upon receiving cash escrow funds. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 11. New Business a. Proposed City Council Work Session City Administrator Martens noted that the City is dealing with increasingly complex items in both development and policy and stated that having the Council meet once a month to discuss these issues before the Council Meetings would be beneficial. The Council discussed holding it from 5:45-6:45 p.m. and noted that it would not be recorded but it would be open to the public and minutes would be recorded. The Council discussed holding meetings before the first or second meeting of the month and decided to do polls to determine what works best for Council members. b. Resignation Notice- Phillip Medrano MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Keefe to accept the resignation notice for Phillip Medrano and finalize the last working day, as well as authorize City Administrator Martens to begin a process to recruit for a replacement of the maintenance operator position. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 12. 2018 Council Schedule City Administrator Martens reviewed the upcoming schedule. 13. Council Liaison Calendar The Council liaison calendar was not reviewed, but was available in the Council packet. 14. Adjournment MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by LaFave to adjourn. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:26 p.m. ________________________________ Brad Martens – City Administrator STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6b. Council Meeting: May 10, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Cancellation of Special Assessment and Certain Fees – 20175 County Road 50 Action Required: Approval Summary: Staff has finalized documents related to closing out the final easement purchase for the downtown utility and street improvement project. The easement agreement was approved on April 14, 2016. Rather than paying the owner cash for the easement, it was agreed to eliminate the assessment approved on the property as well as certain fees. The attached agreement and resolution finalize those actions. It is requested that the City Council approve both items. Financial/Budget: Costs associated with cancelling the special assessments and fees are incorporated into the downtown utility and street improvement project. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: Fiscal Responsibility We believe that the prudent stewardship and opportunistic investment of public funds is essential for confidence in government and to position the City for future success. Council Action: Approve the Agreement to Cancel Special Assessment and Waive Certain Fees Approve Resolution 2018-28 Cancelling Remaining Post 2018 Sewer and Water Related Special Assessments on Certain Parcel Attachments: 1. Agreement to Cancel Special Assessment and Waive Certain Fees 2. Resolution 2018-28 Cancelling Remaining Post 2018 Sewer and Water Related Special Assessments on Certain Parcel City of Corcoran May 10, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-28 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION CANCELLING REMAINING POST 2018 SEWER AND WATER RELATED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON CERTAIN PARCEL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corcoran has imposed special assessments on several parcels within the City related to the Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, Forsberg Properties, LLC (the “Owner”) is the owner of one such parcel as described below: 20175 County Road 50 (PID 26-119-23-12-0017) Legally described as: Outlot A, Jack and Cheryl Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (“Owner’s Property”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Purchase Agreement with the Owner for the purchase of other property rights on Owner’s Property, the City has agreed to cancel the remaining post 2018 Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project related special assessments on Owner’s Property, in the amount noted below; Owner’s Property - 20175 County Road 50 (PID 26-119-23-12-0017): $12,000; and WHEREAS, the Owners shall be responsible for payment of all 2017 and 2018 assessment payments on Owner’s Property (including any applicable interest and fees). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota that the City Council hereby directs that the Owner shall pay all assessments (including any applicable interest and fees) due for 2017 and 2018, and the City hereby cancels the remaining post 2018 special assessments on the Owner’s Property, in the amounts noted below: Owner’s Property - 20175 County Road 50 (PID 26-119-23-12-0017): $12,000 The City Council further directs staff to notify the County Auditor of this cancellation. City of Corcoran May 10, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-28 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 10th day of May, 2018. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Brad Martens – City Administrator AgendaItem 7a-b. CouncilMeetingDate: 5/10/2018 FINANCIALCLAIMS PreparedBy: jrotz CHECKRANGE FUND #500ESCROW CLAIMSAgendaItem: 7a. Paid toAmountProject name 500-20335$ 285.00Carson, Clelland & Schreder - LennarEngineering 500-20392$ 35.63Carson, Clelland & Schreder - MN SolarIUP 16-032 500-20416$ 356.28Carson, Clelland & Schreder - SunriseSolar17-007 500-20420$ 570.02Carson, Clelland & Schreder - BassLakeCrossingM/IHome17-012 500-20445$ 71.26Carson, Clelland & Schreder - Ravinia9thFPandPUD17-042 500-20452$ 47.50Carson, Clelland & Schreder - MatterHomeOccupation18-009 Total 1,365.69 Total Fund #500 = 1,365.69 Seeattached Payments Detail) ALLOTHERFINANCIALCLAIMSAgendaItem:7b.$ 103,768.31$ 105,134.00Total Checks SeeattachedCheckDetailRegister) TotalofAutoDeductions 83,373.11 TOTALEXPENDITURES FORAPPROVAL$ 188,507.11 AutoDeductions / Electronic FundTransfer / OtherDisbursements DatePaid toAmount 4/23/2018Humanity$ 49.00 4/24/2018USA USAAutoShowers V - SaintMichael, MN$ 6.00 4/25/2018Holiday InnDuluth, MN$ 27.78 4/25/2018Chanticlear Bar & Grill - Osseo, MN$ 47.64 4/26/2018OldChicago - Duluth, MN$ 12.00 4/26/2018Holiday InnDuluth, MN$ 17.78 4/26/2018OMC Smokehouse - Duluth, MN$ 46.38 4/27/2018Duluth EntertainmentCenter$ 5.00 4/27/2018Holiday InnDuluth, MN$ 26.57 4/30/2018SPIKESFEEDSEED - LORETTO, MN$ 45.99 4/30/2018Rayallen.comJJDog $ 58.58 4/30/2018Holiday InnDuluth, MN$ 389.46 4/30/2018Holiday InnDuluth, MN$ 491.94 5/3/2018BCA TrainingEducation$ 130.00 4/23/2018MNDeptRev - Fuel tax$ 91.77 4/26/2018POSTALIA, TDCPOSTAGE$ 350.00 4/26/2018PaychexCGS, Garnish$ 531.14 4/26/2018NetPayrollPP09$ 44,671.60 4/27/2018PaychexFee$ 322.40 4/27/2018PERA$ 12,288.51 4/27/2018Payroll Taxes$ 16,518.11 4/30/2018StateofMN - MSRS$ 2,009.07 4/30/2018State ofMN - Roth$ 2,231.84 4/30/2018Optum - HSA$ 3,004.55 Total H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\CouncilClaims\\2018ClaimsWorkbook 05/04/189:32AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 1 Check Detail Register© May 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment 10100 FarmersState Bank Unpaid A-1CONCRETE LEVELING E411-43100-520 Buildings and Structures$5,800.00042618PW FACILITY STRUCTURE Total A-1CONCRETE LEVELING 5,800.00 Unpaid ACMETOOLS E100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$494.695686259DEWALT 10" JOBSITETABLE SAW E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$554.015700843SUPPLIES Total ACMETOOLS 1,048.70 Unpaid AMAZONCAPITALSERVICES E100-42100-201 Postage/Shipping$13.991C7H-YDQL-LPOSTAGE SHIPPING E101-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$78.981L4D-QPNG-3COMP PLANSUPPLIES E100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$96.411V39-13TQ-3FIT SUPPLIES Total AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 189.38 Unpaid BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY E100-43100-212 MotorFuels$499.55474586PROPANE - 9525CAIN ROAD Total BEAUDRYOILCOMPANY 499.55 Unpaid CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER E100-42100-304 LegalFees$2,119.04042518CRIMINAL E100-41600-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$47.50042518LAMETTI CONTRACT ACTON E205-42100-304 Legal Fees$81.25042518VEHICLE FORFEITURE E423-45200-510 Land$213.76042518ROCKFORD SCHOOLLAND PURCHASE G500-20335 Lennar Eng PlanReview/Modific$285.00042518LENNAR ENGINEERING G500-20392 Potentia SolarInc$35.63042518MNSOLAR E100-41600-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$2,117.74042518CIVIL - LEGAL E100-41600-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$95.00042518RAVINIA - TABOR E100-41600-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$285.01042518TOTAL CONTROLSOLUTIONS AGREEMENT G500-20416 SunriseSolar - 17-007$356.28042518SUNRISE SOLAR17-007 G500-20420 BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012$570.02042518BASS LAKECROSSING M/IHOME 17-012 G500-20445 Ravinia9thFPandPUD17-042$71.26042518RAVINIA 9TH FPANDPUD17-042 G500-20452 Matter HomeOccupation 18-009$47.50042518MATTER HOME OCCUPATION18-009 Total CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER 6,324.99 Unpaid CDWGOVERNMENT E100-41951-207 ComputerSupplies$573.26MJV9675COMPUTER SUPPLIES Total CDWGOVERNMENT 573.26 Unpaid CINTAS - 470 E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$0.00PUBLIC WORKS TOWELS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$0.00PUBLIC WORKS TOWELS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$85.184005090176CITY HALLRUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$185.454005090187PW UNIFORMS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.504005090194CITYHALLRUGS E100-42100-223 Building RepairSupplies$64.834005090207PD RUGS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$49.944005090232PW RUGS 05/04/189:32AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 2 Check Detail Register© May 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$85.184005420950CITYHALLRUGS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$49.944005420961PW RUGS E100-42100-223 Building RepairSupplies$64.834005420973PD RUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.504005421029CITY HALLRUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$159.484005421065PW UNIFORMS E100-42100-223 BuildingRepairSupplies$76.494005594171PD RUGS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$91.264005594200PW RUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$159.484005594209PWUNIFORMS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$85.184005594214CITYHALLRUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$82.504005594227CITYHALLRUGS Total CINTAS - 470 1,404.74 Unpaid COMCAST- 902943336 E100-41941-321 Telephone$108.2663800764LAND LINE E100-42100-321 Telephone$108.2663800764LAND LINE E100-43100-321 Telephone$108.2863800764LANDLINE Total COMCAST- 902943336 324.80 Unpaid CUMMINSNPOWER LLC E100-41941-400 Repairs & MaintCont (GENERAL$765.74E4-15315SERVICE ONGENERATOR Total CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 765.74 Unpaid CUSTOM STUCCO & PLASTER, LLC E100-43100-223 Building RepairSupplies$850.00042418EIFS PATCHING AND TOUCH UP Total CUSTOM STUCCO & PLASTER, LLC 850.00 Unpaid DEANS PROFESSIONAL PLUMBING R100-42400-32210 Bldg/PlanReviewFees$50.002018-00081REFUNDPERMIT 2018-00081 Total DEANS PROFESSIONAL PLUMBING 50.00 Unpaid EVOLVINGSOLUTIONSINC E100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$1,350.0099610ITMANAGED SERVICE - MTH Total EVOLVINGSOLUTIONSINC 1,350.00 Unpaid GOPHERSTATEONE CALL E601-49400-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$41.858040295SERVICE E602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$41.858040295SERVICE Total GOPHER STATE ONECALL 83.70 Unpaid HANOVER, CITYOF E100-42200-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$16,029.092018-12018 FIRE PROTECTION - 1STQUARTER Total HANOVER, CITYOF 16,029.09 Unpaid HOLIDAY STATION STORES E100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$65.0034_01051816PREPAID CARWASH Total HOLIDAYSTATIONSTORES 65.00 Unpaid JOTSCOMPUTER SERVICES E100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$1,068.7525479CONTRACT SERVICE 05/04/189:32AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 3 Check Detail Register© May 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment Total JOTS COMPUTERSERVICES 1,068.75 Unpaid MAPLE GROVE, CITYOF E601-49400-311 Water Purchased$2,943.3518310WATER USAGE Total MAPLE GROVE, CITYOF 2,943.35 Unpaid MARTENS, BRAD E100-41300-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$50.00042518CELL PHONE E100-41300-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$70.85042518MILEAGE G100-21709 DependentCareFSAWithhold$645.00042518DEPENDENT CARE FSA E100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$171.99050218MICROSOFTSURFACE SUPPLIES Total MARTENS, BRAD 937.84 Unpaid MENARDS MAPLEGROVE E100-45200-221 Maintenance Projects$268.0220653SUPPLIES E100-45200-221 Maintenance Projects$757.4920862SUPPLIES E100-45200-221 Maintenance Projects$258.7321154SUPPLIES Total MENARDS MAPLE GROVE 1,284.24 Unpaid METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES E100-42400-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$17,744.111495FINALIZEDINSPECTIONS Total METROWESTINSPECTIONSERVICES 17,744.11 Unpaid METROPOLITANAREAMGRSASSOC E100-41300-208 Training and Instruction$25.002839MEETING Total METROPOLITAN AREA MGRS ASSOC 25.00 Unpaid METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MCES E602-49450-310 OtherProfessional Services$29,521.80050318SAC ACTIVITY Total METROPOLITANCOUNCILMCES 29,521.80 Unpaid MIMBACH FLEET SUPPLYINC E100-43100-225 Landscape/DitchMaterials$61.99141822SUPPLIES E100-45200-221 Maintenance Projects$61.98141822SUPPLIES E100-43100-225 Landscape/DitchMaterials$917.79142632SUPPLIES E100-45200-221 Maintenance Projects$917.80142632SUPPLIES Total MIMBACH FLEETSUPPLY INC 1,959.56 Unpaid MN CHIEFS OFPOLICE ASSOC E100-42100-208 Training and Instruction$880.005159LATEFULLCONFERENCE MEMBER REGISTRATION 4-22 TO4-25 Total MNCHIEFSOFPOLICE ASSOC 880.00 Unpaid MORRISELECTRONICS E100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$120.0020146352SERVICE LABOR E100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$200.0020146651SERVICE LABOR E100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$60.0020146669SERVICE LABOR Total MORRIS ELECTRONICS 380.00 05/04/189:32AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 4 Check Detail Register© May 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment Unpaid NAPAAUTOPARTS - CORCORAN E100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$129.59172290SUPPLIES E100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)($18.00)172354SUPPLIES Total NAPAAUTO PARTS - CORCORAN 111.59 Unpaid NORTHERN SAFETYTECHNOLOGY E100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$296.0045477SUPPLIES Total NORTHERN SAFETYTECHNOLOGY 296.00 Unpaid OFFICEDEPOT E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$60.18130056774001SUPPLIES E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$349.98130056774001SUPPLIES E100-41941-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$107.39130056774001SUPPLIES Total OFFICEDEPOT 517.55 Unpaid OPTUM E100-41941-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$105.50946855H.S.A. MAINTENANCE FEES Total OPTUM 105.50 Unpaid PUBLICSAFETY MINISTRIESINC. E202-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$1,200.002018-170CHAPLAIN SERVICES: PROGRAM ASSESSMENT 1-1- 18TO 12-31-18 Total PUBLIC SAFETYMINISTRIES INC. 1,200.00 Unpaid RANDYSENVIRONMENTALSERVICES E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$267.72042318CITY HALLGARBAGE 1280351 E100-43232-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$485.48042318MONTHLYRECYCLING E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$238.23042318PARKS GARBAGE 11039 E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$189.14042318PUBLIC WORKS GARBAGE (9100) 12 Total RANDYSENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,180.57 Unpaid ROLFERICKSONENTERPRISES INC E100-41550-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$5,053.75042318MONTHLY ASSESSING FEE E100-41550-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$12.84042318COUNTY DATA FEE E100-41550-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$203.78042318FORMS ANDSUPPLIES - POSTAGE Total ROLFERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC 5,270.37 Unpaid SPRINT E100-43100-321 Telephone$358.32391283315-19CELL SERVICE Total SPRINT 358.32 Unpaid STREICHER SPOLICEEQUIPMENT E100-42100-417 Uniforms($114.98)CM279395UNIFORMS E100-42100-417 Uniforms$59.99i1312029UNIFORMS E100-42100-417 Uniforms$86.95I1312031UNIFORMS E100-42100-417 Uniforms$114.98I1312031-1UNIFORMS Total STREICHER SPOLICEEQUIPMENT 146.94 Unpaid SYMBOLARTS 05/04/189:32AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 5 Check Detail Register© May 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment E100-42100-209 Police Reserves$1,880.000303796-INUNIFORM PATCHES Total SYMBOLARTS 1,880.00 Unpaid TEAMSTER LOCAL320 G100-21707 Union Dues$343.44MAY18UNION DUES/TLDF Total TEAMSTERLOCAL 320 343.44 Unpaid TEGRETE E100-41941-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (GENERAL$365.0074379MONTHLY CITYHALL CLEANING Total TEGRETE 365.00 Unpaid TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE E100-42100-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$25.003609221-0418SERVICE Total TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE 25.00 Unpaid UNIQUEPAVINGMATERIALS E100-43100-233 Asphalt Maint/Patching$263.7535265COLD ASPHALT MIX Total UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS 263.75 Unpaid VONCO II, LLC E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$78.560000043612WASTE REMOVAL Total VONCO II, LLC 78.56 Unpaid XCELENERGY E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$887.81589069077UTILITIES - 9100 Total XCEL ENERGY 887.81 10100 Farmers StateBank$105,134.00 FundSummary 10100 Farmers State Bank 100 GENERAL FUND$63,845.47 101 LONG-TERM PLANNINGFUND$78.98 202POLICE DONATION FUND$1,200.00 205DWIFORFEITURE FUND$81.25 411PUBLICWORKS FACILITY$5,800.00 423ROCKFORDSCHOOLLANDPURCHASE$213.76 500 ESCROWHOLDING FUND$1,365.69 601WATER$2,985.20 602 SEWER$29,563.65 105,134.00 CityofCorcoran ConsultantSummary 5/10/2018 NameInvoice DateAmount Due Carson, Clelland & Scherder04/25/18 6,324.99 Landform MetroWestInspection04/30/18 17,744.11 RolfEricksonEnterprises04/23/18$ 5,270.37 Wenck Associates Total$ 29,339.47 CSBS\\cityhall\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\Council Information\\CouncilClaims\\2018ClaimsWorkbook Vendor CARSON,CLELLAND&SCHREDER CITY OF CORCORAN Date: 4-25-18 PAYMENT VOUCHER Address: CARSON,CLELLAND&SCHREDER 6300 SHINGLE CREEK PKWY#305 Payment Total: $ 6,324.99 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55430-2190 Due Date: 05/25/18 Fund Department Account Description Amount 100 41600 300 CIVIL-LEGAL 2,117.74 100 41600 300 RAVINIA-TABOR 95.00 100 41600 300 TOTAL CONTROL SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT 285.01 100 42100 304 CRIMINAL 2,119.04 r 100 41600 300 LENNAR/RAVINIA 100 41600 300 Gleason Parkway Extension 100 41600 300 Lametti Contract Action 47.50 205 42100 304 VEHICLE FORFEITURE 81.25 411 43100 300 PW FLOOR SETTLING 422 43100 530 DT UTILITY PROJECT-STREET 37% 422 49400 530 DT UTILITY PROJECT-WATER 28% 422 49450 530 DT UTILITY PROJECT-SEWER 35% 423 45200 510 ROCKFORD SCHOOL LAND PURCHASE 213.76 i 500 20320 Lennar Design 500 20335 Lennar Engineering 285.00 500 20389 _ STREHLER ESTATES 16-01 500 20392 MN Solar 35.63 ' 500 20400 RAVINIA 5TH&6TH 500 20407 MOTOR CAFE CUP 500 20416 Sunrise Solar 17-007 500 20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 356.28 i 570.02 500 20421 Ravinia 7th Addition 500 20423 Bass Lake Estates Sketch PUD 17-015 500 20433 Bass Lk Est PP/PUD, CPA 17-026/Bass Lk Cross South 500 20436 PULTE DEVELOPMENT 500 20439 Bass Lake Cross MI Home Turn Lanes 17-012 500 20441 Olsen Access Encroachment Agreement 500 20445 RAVINIA 9TH FP AND PUD 17-042 71.26 ' 500 20452 Matter Home Occupation 18-009 47.50 t 601 49400 304 WATER-50% 602 49450 304 SEWER-50% TOTAL: $ 6,324.99 Approved Notes Check# 3 )(Z3 1 Carson, Clelland Schreder APR 2 5 2018 A'I"I'ORNEYS AT LAW 6300 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY STE 305 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55430-2190 763)-561-2800 April 25, 2018 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 CO RD 116 CORCORAN, MN 55340 Professional Services Amount Civil 4/4/2018 Review correspondence from property owner's attorney, review City ordinance, 190.00 correspondence with Planner, research assessment authority issue Conference with Administrator regarding open files, survey, assessment authority issue 35.63 4/5/2018 Review City Hall lease, bond purchase agreement, option agreement, research City use 320.63 authority, review state statutes related to financing, conference with Attorney Carson regarding original land use negotiation Correspondence with Administrator, review correspondence from Watershed District, review 142.50 submitted watershed authority, review statutory authority, update file 4/6/2018 Pull 4/12 City Council agenda packet for review 17.50 Research caselaw regarding watershed authority, correspondence with watershed 213.75 representative, correspondence with LMC attorney 4/10/2018 Review Council agenda packet, previous dust control resolutions 178.13 4/11/2018 Review League correspondence regarding City authority issue, correspondence with Jim 71.25 Kujawa regarding watershed investigation status, review proposed condemnation timelines Correspondence with Administrator, review citizen complaint, review bond agreement, 35.63 update files Conference with Administrator regarding City Hall use restrictions, condemnation project, 47.50 watershed charges and response 4/12/2018 Conference with watershed representative regarding pending investigation and potential 142.50 findings, enforcement protocols, review preliminary findings and disclosures, draft/revise letter to property owner's attorney Correspondence with Planner, begin review of draft SIPA agreement 47.50 Conference with Attorney Thames and review documents; prepare, send correspondence 52.50 regarding watershed fees, update file 4/13/2018 Correspondence with Director of Public Safety regarding proposed reimbursement 71.25 agreement, review audit data,correspondence, conference with Director of Public Safety 4/16/2018 Correspondence with Code Enforcement Official regarding property complaint and state 35.63 investigation, correspondence with Chief regarding City reimbursement issue CITY OF CORCORAN Page 2 Amount 4/18/2018 Continue review of draft SIPA agreement, revise agreement 47.50 4/19/2018 Conference with Planner regarding model city SIPA agreement revisions, LOC 71.25 policy/template revisions 4/20/2018 Open new file, pull City Council agenda packet for review 40.83 Research statutory reference for voting requirement 35.63 Review lease restrictions, state law restrictions on bond funded property regarding City Hall 71.25 renovations 4/23/2018 Correspondence with Administrator, draft/revise assessment cancellation resolution, review 249.38 easement agreement, correspondence with Hope regarding liquor licensing issue, review state statutes regarding applicable licenses and restrictions, review previous correspondence with Clerk regarding assessor response and requirements, update files SUBTOTAL: 1 0 0- I(700-3") 2,117.74] Bass Lake Crossing Easements 3/29/2018 Review HOA documents, previous staff revisions, approval conditions, propose revisions 178.13 Conference with Planner regarding easement legals, HOA document revisions, 71.25 correspondence with John Rask, update file 3/30/2018 Correspondence with Planner, John Rask, review revised HOA documents and exhibits 71.25 4/2/2018 Draft/revise/finalize easements, add utility language, update legals, correspondence with 142.50 John Rask, conference with Planner, update file Conference with Planner, correspondence with John Rask regarding final easement terms, 35.63 update file 4/16/2018 Conference with Planner regarding indemnification agreement, recording issues,35.63 development agreement 4/18/2018 Correspondence with Planner, John Rask, review revised resolutions 35.63 SUBTOTAL:2o`1Zv 570.02] Lametti Contract Action 4/3/2018 Correspondence with Public Works Director, review correspondence from Lametti regarding 47.50 resolution of contract, update file SUBTOTAL:op,_,.L,1)6(k)-300 [47.50] Lennar Encroachment Agreements 4/10/2018 Review/compare Lennar re-draft of encroachment agreements, research liability issues, 285.00 conference with Public Works Director regarding deal points, revise agreements, prepare redlined drafts, update file SUBTOTAL: Sou - 2v3'c [ 285.00] Matter Home Occupation 4/2/2018 Conference with Planner regarding home occupation application, review standards, Data 47.50 Practices issues SUBTOTAL:500-7, `15-Z- 47.50] CITY OF CORCORAN Page 3 Amount MN Solar Application 3/29/2018 Conference with Planner regarding LOC requirements, correspondence with developer,35.63 update file, list requested revisions SUBTOTAL: 506-Zo3 92 [ 35.63] Park Purchase/Rockford School District 3/30/2018 Review title commitment and attached County records 71.25 4/3/2018 Review final version of Purchase Agreement, correspondence from title company,further 35.63 review exceptions Review school district Purchase Agreement per request of Attorney Thames and conference 71.25 regarding title exceptions 4/5/2018 Correspondence with Administrator, review disclosure requirements in Purchase Agreement, 35.63 update file SUBTOTAL: L123-u15Zdi) "54) [ 213.76] Ravinia-Tabor 3/28/2018 Conference with Tabor attorney regarding proposed stipulation and city zoning approvals, 95.00 correspondence with Planner, review correspondence from County regarding deed designations SUBTOTAL: vo 1600—Sob [95.00] Ravinia 9th 3/29/2018 Review proposed LOC draft 35.63 4/9/2018 Conference with Planner regarding plat amendment recording, administrative review 35.63 SUBTOTAL: 5-0b-Z&1L1 [71.26] Sunrise Solar Application 3/29/2018 Conference with Planner regarding LOC requirements, correspondence with developer, 35.63 update file, list requested revisions 4/9/2018 Conference with Planner regarding performance bond terms 35.63 4/10/2018 Review revised decommissioning bond, further revise bond, compare template language, 106.88 correspondence with Planner 4/13/2018 Review project performance bond draft 71.25 4/16/2018 Review performance bond, correspondence with Planner 35.63 Conference with Planner regarding additional bond revisions, definition revisions 35.63 4/19/2018 Review final bond draft, correspondence with staff 35.63 SUBTOTAL: Z04 16 356.28] CITY OF CORCORAN Page 4 Amount Total Control Solutions Agreement 4/2/2018 Correspondence with Administrator, review/revise Assessment Agreement, correspondence 71.25 with Jeff Forsberg, update file 4/13/2018 Conference with Jeff Forsberg regarding Total Control Solutions assessment agreement, 106.88 review easement, Purchase Agreement, correspondence with Administrator, update file 4/16/2018 Correspondence with Administrator, correspondence with Jeff Forsberg, revise assessment 106.88 cancellation agreement SUBTOTAL: 10u-H 160u -3°6 285.01] Criminal 3/28/2018 Attend arraignments and pretrial hearings 48.75 3/29/2018 Review and update files from 3/27 court calendar 8.13 3/31/2018 Preparation for upcoming jury trial, review file and audio tapes 97.50 4/2/2018 Review discovery, note files 24.38 Attend jury trial hearings downtown 195.00 Review and respond to emails 24.38 Review files in preparation for 4/3 Brookdale court calendar 32.50 4/3/2018 Review files for court; review criminal history, driving record, probation status, victim input, 16.25 prepare offers Review file and prepare letter to victim 32.50 Attend hearings at Brookdale court 97.50 4/4/2018 Handle morning and afternoon court hearings at Brookdale 16.25 Discuss upcoming cases with Attorney Thames 24.38 Review files, prepare disposition letters 32.50 4/6/2018 Further review and update of files from 4/4 court hearings 16.25 Preparation of one complaint 40.00 4/9/2018 Prepare follow up instructions to assistants after court 16.25 Review files for court; review criminal histories, driving records, probation status, victim 32.50 input, prepare offers 4/10/2018 Attend hearings at Brookdale court 32.50 Review files in preparation for 4/11 calendar at Brookdale 32.50 4/11/2018 Review discovery, note files 32.50 Handle arraignment and pretrial hearings at Brookdale court 65.00 4/12/2018 Correspondence with victim 24.38 Review voicemails and review police reports 24.38 Update case files from 4/10 court hearings 16.25 Review files, prepare disposition letters and notes for follow up 24.38 4/13/2018 Review files for court on 4/18; review criminal histories, driving records, probation status, 16.25 victim input, prepare offers 4/16/2018 Correspondence with Chief, review correspondence from Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, 48.75 correspondence with victim, update files Review discovery, correspondence with victim, update files 24.38 Review files in preparation for 4/17 calendar at Brookdale court 32.50 Review file, correspondence with resident 97.50 4/17/2018 Handle Brookdale court calendar 65.00 CITY OF CORCORAN Page 5 Amount 4/18/2018 Attend hearings at Brookdale court 48.75 4/19/2018 Preparation of two complaints 80.00 Review video tape 32.50 Further review and updates to case files from 4/18 court hearings 32.50 4/20/2018 Review files, prepare disposition letters and notes for follow up 24.38 4/23/2018 Review files for court on 4/25; review criminal histories, driving records, probation status, 16.25 victim input, prepare offers Review files, prepare disposition letters and notes to files 32.50 Open criminal files, preparation of criminal complaints; preparation of cases for court 112.50 calendars, including court and jury trials;contact and notice to witnesses for trial testimony, prepare outgoing discovery requests, complete incoming discovery requests for monthly period Open criminal files, preparation of criminal complaints; preparation of cases for court 78.13 calendars, including court and jury trials; contact and notice to witnesses for trial testimony, prepare outgoing discovery requests, complete incoming discovery requests for monthly period Open criminal files, preparation of criminal complaints; preparation of cases for court 178.13 calendars, including court and jury trials;contact and notice to witnesses for trial testimony, prepare outgoing discovery requests,complete incoming discovery requests for monthly period SUBTOTAL: jou-N21 " 3u1-1 [ 1,926.931 Vehicle Forfeiture: 4/4/2018 Prepare forfeiture paperwork and letter to defendant 81.25 SUBTOTAL: Z65.-6111 301 1 81.251 For professional services rendered 6,132.88 Client Expense Charges : Criminal Expenses: Monthly support fee 16.26 Legal process service 104.50 Westlaw charges for February 71.35 SUBTOTAL: 192.111 Total Client Expense Charges 100-92.1w-301 192.11 Total amount of this bill 6,324.99 Previous balance 7,150.09 4/20/2018 Payment-thank you 7,150.09) Total payments and adjustments 7,150.09) CITY OF CORCORAN Page 6 Amount Balance due 6,324.99 I hereby declare under the penalties of perjury that the foregoing statement for legal services is just and correct and that no part thereof has been paid. John J.Thames, City Attorney Vendor: METRO WEST INSPECTION SRV CITY OF CORCORAN Date 4-30-18 PAYMENT VOUCHER Address: METRO WEST INSPECTION SRV BOX 248 Payment Total: $ 17,744.11 LORETTO MN 55357 Due Date: 05/30/18 Fund Department Account Description Amount 100 20201 INSPECTION-2015 100 20201 INSPECTION-2016 100 42400 300 FINALIZED INSPECTIONS 1495 17,744.11 100 20201 INSPECTION-2016 100 42400 300 INSPECTION-2017 100 42400 300 MEETINGS & PLAN REVIEWS 100 42400 300 MEETINGS & PLAN REVIEWS 100 42200 300 FIRE MARSHALL INSPECTIONS TOTAL : , $ 17,744.11 Approved Notes Check# 3/6.172 Metro West Inspection Services, Inc. 689 Medina St, Suite 250 Loretto, MN 55357 ks.metrowest @gmail.com Metro West Inspection Services, Inc. INVOICE BILL TO r lr INVOICE# 1495 City of Corcoran DATE 04/25/2018 8200 County Rd 116 DUE DATE 05/25/2018 Corcoran, MN 55340 TERMS Net 30 ACTIVITY HOURS RATE AMOUNT Fineled Permits 1 17,744.11 17,744.11 Fineled permits March 2018 BALANCE DUE r, 1 i 111111 A METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES,INC. BOX 248 LORETTO,MN 55357 PH.763-479-1720 FAX 763-479-3090 BILLED TO: City of Corcoran 8200 County Rd 116 Corcoran,MN 55340 Invoice Date April 27,2018 35%BOWe Fees, Permit it Pam*Address Mechanical,eliminate,Plan 100% Total Fees Check,SEC 2017-00221 6485 Larkspur Ct 5,607.73 1,962.71 2017-00264 6482 Larkspur Ct 4,779.13 1,672.70 2017-00273 19131 66th Ave N 4,613.72 1,614.80 2017-00274 19425 Lupine Lane 4,468.25 1,563.89 2017-00292 19386 Lupine Ln 5,678.69 1,987.54 2017-00421 19386 Lupine Ln 100.00 35.00 2017-00354 6495 Carriage Way 4,868.81 1,704.08 2017-00355 19212 66th Ave N 4,205.07 1,471.77 2017-00362 19155 66th Ave N 4,507.04 1,577.46 2017-00398 6449 Larkspur Ct 4,677.21 1,637.02 2017-00403 22485 Rush Creek Dr 4,280.09 1,498.03 2017-00406 9650 Co Rd 19 90.00 31.50 2017-00417 6235 Co Rd 101 90.00 31.50 2017-00418 20600 Rush Meadows Ln 100.00 35.00 2017-00409 19213 Paddock Ln 549.04 192.16 2017-00424 9433 Fox Valley Dr 75.00 26.25 2017-00425 19206 66th Ave N 15.00 5.25 2017-00423 6507 Carriage Way 62.78 21.97 2017-00422 22645 Co Rd 10 714.53 250.09 2017-00419 23535 Julie Ann Dr 150.00 52.50 2018-00001 6416 Hunter La 133.24 46.63 2018-00004 19288 Sorrel Ct 549.04 192.16 2018-00005 8915 Co Rd 101 75.00 26.25 2018-00014 19191 66th Ave N 15.00 5.25 2018-00015 6820 Olde Sturbridge Dr 75.00 26.25 2018-00018 19098 Galloway Cr 108.08 37.83 2018-00019 19086 Galloway Cr 90.00 31.50 2018-00027 7800 Maple Hill Rd 20.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page Total 17,744.11 Invoice Total 517,744.11 Vendor: ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC CITY OF CORCORAN Date: 4-23-18 PAYMENT VOUCHER Address: ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC PO BOX 47841 payment Total: $ 5,270.37 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 Due Date: 05/23/18 Fund Department Account Description Amount 100 41550 300 MONTHLY ASSESSING FEE 042318 5,053.75 100 41550 300 COUNTY DATA FEE 12.84 100 41550 210 FORMS AND SUPPLIES- POSTAGE 203.78 100 41550 210 FORMS AND SUPPLIES 100 41550 210 FORMS AND SUPPLIES 100 41550 201 POSTAGE TOTAL : $ 5,270.37 Approved Notes Check# 3/V ji i APR 2 3 2018 STATEMENT 23-Apr-18 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES, INC. SOUTWEST ASSESSING P O BOX 47841 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 Co. Rd. 116 CORCORAN, MN 55340 APRIL 2018 ASSESSING FEE 5,053.75 COUNTY DATA FEE 12.84 SUPPLIES, COPIES AND FORMS 203.78 TOTAL 5,270.37 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 8a. Council Meeting: May 10, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commission Representatives Action Required: None – Informational Summary: The advisory commission representatives for the May 10th Council meeting are as follows: Planning Commission: Dorothy Theis Parks and Trails Commission: TBD Financial/Budget: N/A Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: Transparency We believe that open an honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry. Processes and decision making should include opportunities to educate citizens and receive feedback. Options: N/A Recommendation N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: N/A 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 30, 2018 for May 10, 2018 City Council Meeting RE: Consideration of Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC for “Encore” a 393-420 home development from Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC at 9975 County Road 101 (PID 1211923120001, 0111923430002 & 0111923440001) (city file 18-004) 1.Application Request The Environment Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is required for the 393-420 single family homes proposed on the 216-acre site. The property is located west of County Road 101 and North of County Road 30. The Minnesota Environmental Review Program rules require a mandatory EAW for residential developments with more than 250 homes for a city the size of Corcoran. Approval of a finding of “no need” for EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) requires a 3/5 vote of the City Council. 2.Comments Received on the EAW Section 4410.1600 of the Environmental Rules states that comments received on the EAW shall address the accuracy and completeness of the material, potential environmental impacts that may warrant further investigation before the project is commenced, and the need for an EIS on the proposed project. The 30-day EAW comment period ended on April 11, 2018 at the end of business day. The response to the EAW comments was prepared and is listed as attachment called the “Record of Decision”. This document includes all written comments submitted by the public and governmental agencies as well as the responses. A letter was received from the City of Maple of Grove after the end of the comment period. Because it was received after April 11th, it is not included in the Record of Decision but is included in this packet for the Council’s information. 3.Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making Under Minnesota Environmental Review Program rules, the City is the governmental unit responsible for preparing this EAW and determining whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects. The purpose of the environmental review process is to provide usable information to the project proposer, governmental decision-makers, and the public concerning the primary environmental Agenda Item: 9a. Pulte EAW (city file 18-004) 2 May 10, 2018 effects of a proposed project. The EAW should identify measures to protect the environment that can later be imposed as conditions of approval in future development applications. If the EAW identifies significant environmental effects that cannot be mitigated or minimized, the City Council would order preparation of an EIS. An EIS does not necessarily disclose more information about potential impacts; but rather, its main purpose is to examine project alternatives and additional mitigative measures to lessen significant impacts identified in the EAW. Furthermore, an EIS is not a means to approve or deny a project, but is an additional source of information to guide decisions. Very few projects move to the EIS stage, because in most cases the EAW does an adequate job of describing potential impacts and identifying mitigative measures. The statutory standard for requiring an EIS is whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects—it is not whether the EAW has adequately disclosed information about potential impacts. Accordingly, if the City Council determines that the EAW does not disclose sufficient information about potential impacts, the City Council would request additional information before making a decision on the need for an EIS. In deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects that would warrant the preparation of an EIS, the City Council must consider the following factors (Minnesota Environmental Review Rules Section 4410.1700, Subpart 7): 1. type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects; 2. cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects; 3. the extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority; and 4. the extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs. The City Council has three courses of action when reviewing an EAW. These actions include: 1. require additional information to address possible environmental effects not adequately discussed in the EAW, 2. make a finding of “no need” for an EIS, or 3. order an EIS. 4. Public Comment Period Minnesota Environmental Quality Board advertises the availability of the document and the City transmits the EAW to a standard list of regional and state agencies for comment. The comment period for an EAW is 30 days. During this time period, the agencies and any member of the general public may comment on the EAW. The 30-day comment period ended on April 11, 2018. Comments submitted during the 30-day comment period should address the accuracy and completeness of the material contained in the EAW, potential impacts that may warrant further investigation before the project is commenced, and the need for an EIS on the proposed project. After the close of the comment period, staff and the applicant prepared responses to the comments for review and consideration by the City Council. Pulte EAW (city file 18-004) 3 May 10, 2018 The response is included in the record of decision. The record of decision is intended to serve as the City’s findings of fact of a decision that an EIS does not need to be prepared for this project. The City received seven comment letters from reviewing agencies, none of which stated that the EAW was inadequate or incomplete or identified the need for the preparation of an EIS. 5. Development Review Process If the City Council declares a finding of “no need” for an EIS, the City Council may act on the developer’s application for a Rezoning, PUD preliminary plan and preliminary plat. In addition to the City’s public process, the developer would be required to obtain the permits listed in the EAW. 6. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the resolution declaring a finding of “no need” for Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), based on the review of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) dated March 5, 2018. Attachments 1. Resolution declaring a finding of “no need” for an Environmental Impact Statement 2. Record of Decision (includes written comments submitted by the public and governmental agencies, as well as a response to those comments) 3. May 2, 2018 letter from City of Maple Grove City of Corcoran May 10, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-31 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION DECLARING FINDING OF “NO NEED” FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) BASED UPON THE REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) DATED MARCH 5, 2018 FOR THE “ENCORE” PROJECT PROPOSED PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA, LLC AT 9975 COUNTY ROAD 101 (PID 1211923120001, 0111923430002 & 0111923440001) (CITY FILE 18-004) WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for single family homes on February 22, 2018; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Review Program Rules 4410.4300, Subpart 36, the City of Corcoran, as the responsible government unit submitted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed project on March 5, 2018; and, WHEREAS, the EAW was published in the March 12, 2018 edition of the EQB Monitor, which started the required 30-day public comment period that commenced on March 12, 2018 and ended on April 11, 2018; and WHEREAS, the RGU received six comment letters that are incorporated by reference in the Record of Decision and all comments and recommendations received from reviewing agencies and other interested parties have been considered; and, WHEREAS, responses were prepared for comment letters received and these responses to comments are provided in the Record of Decision; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed project does not present a potential for environmental impacts of such significance that an Environmental Impact Statement would be required; WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Rules, Section 4410.1700, the RGU shall base its decision regarding the need for an EIS on the information gathered during the EAW process, the comments received on the EAW, and the criteria established by the EQB to determine whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects as provided in the Record of Decision; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does make a Negative Declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed residential development, based on the Record of Decision, which is hereby approved, adopted and incorporated herein. City of Corcoran May 10, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-31 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jonathan Bottema, Jonathan Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 10th day of May 2018. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Brad Martens – City Administrator FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ENCORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET April 2018 ENCORE EAW 2 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND……………………………………….….…3 II. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS………………………………...………….………4 III. FINDINGS OF FACT…………………………………...…………………...…....13 a. Project Description……………………………………………….…..……….13 b. Corrections to the EAW…………………………………………….…......…13 IV. DECISION REGARDING NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT…………………………………………………………………….....14 a. Type, Extent, and Reversibility of Impacts…………………...………….…14 b. Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects..14 c. Extent to which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation by Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority………………………………….…14 d. Extent to which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled as a Result of Other Environmental Studies …….……….…..15 V. RECORD OF DECISION……………………………………..…………...….….16 ATTACHMENT 1. MARCH 5, 2018 EAW ATTACHMENT 2. COMMENTS RECEIVED ENCORE EAW 3 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ENCORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSEMENT WORKSHEET CORCORAN HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I. ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND The City of Corcoran is the Responsible Governmental Unit for this project and PulteGroup is the project proposer. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared for this project in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410. The EAW was developed to assess the potential impacts of the project and other circumstances to determine if an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed. The EAW was filed with the Minnesota EQB and circulated for review and comments to the required EAW distribution list. A “Notice of Availability” for the initial EAW was published in the EQB Monitor on March 12, 2018. A Notice of Availability and Press Release were published in the Crow River News and on the City of Corcoran website. These notices provided a brief description of the project and information on where copies of the EAW were available and invited the public to provide comments that would be used in determining the need for an EIS for the proposed Project. The EAW was made available for public review at Corcoran City Hall, and the public comment period was closed on April 11, 2018. The EAW has been hereby incorporated by reference as Attachment 1 to this Record of Decision (ROD) and can be found on file with the City of Corcoran. All comments received during the EAW comment period were considered in determining the potential for significant environmental impacts. Comments received during the Comment Period can be found in Attachment 2 of this document. ENCORE EAW 4 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 II. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The public review period for the Encore Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) began on March 12, 2018 and was closed on April 11, 2018. The following responses were prepared to address questions and comments received during the public review period. The following agencies provided comment letters: Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Transportation Hennepin County Metropolitan Council No comments were received from any other individual or entity other than those listed above. A copy of each letter or email correspondence is included within Attachment 2. Response to all comments, by agency, is below. 1. Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources Comment: “…The project proposes over 3 acres of wetland impact. This will have to be permitted for so I anticipate permit applications coming in within the next few months.” Response: Comment noted. A wetland delineation has been completed on a portion of the Project site, and those areas not delineated will be required to obtain an approved delineation to determine the extent of the proposed impact. After the full delineation is complete, a mitigation plan will be required and proper permits and approvals for any proposed impacts acquired prior to any site construction. 2. Minnesota Historical Society Comment: “. . . Due to the nature and location of the proposed project, we recommend that a Phase I archaeological survey be completed…..We will reconsider the need for a survey if the project area can be documented as previously surveyed or disturbed.” Response: ENCORE EAW 5 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 Comment noted. The majority of the site has been actively farmed and has been disturbed for crops. The City will work with the Project Proposer to determine whether there is any historical information or records at the City that would suggest a Phase I is warranted on the Project site. Based on available data, and response to the inquiry made to SHPO during EAW preparation process, the City does not believe an archaeological survey is necessary. If SHPO has any information that would suggest further investigation of the site is warranted, the City would request that the information be provided. 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Comment: Item 8: “This section indicates that a Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for project related wetland impacts may be necessary. Please be aware that if a USACE Section 404 Individual Permit is required for any project activity, then an MPCA CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver must also be obtained as part of the permitting process. In addition, an antidegradation assessment is required as part of the certification…” Response: Comment noted. If a USACE Section 404 Individual permit is determined to be necessary through the project review process, the Project Proposer will be required to obtain a MPCA CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver in compliance with MPCA rules and regulations. Comment: Item 11: “…For any water conveyance that may flow into the impaired waters; in-water best management practices such as silt curtain, construction during no/low flow periods, winter conditions, and various types of check damns to minimize total suspended solids (TSS) must be implemented.” Response: Comment noted. At this time the Project Proposer does not anticipate any water conveyance to the impaired waters as a result of the site construction activities. However, the Project Proposer will include identification of in-water best management practices in applicable permitting processes that may be used during construction of the Project. Comment: Item 11: “….if any portion of the Project is located within one aerial mile of Rush Creek and the Project will result in 50 or more acres of disturbed soil with all phases of the development, Stormwater Pollution Prevent Plan (SWPPP) must be submitted to the MPCA for review and approval prior to obtaining National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Construction Stormwater permit (CSW permit) coverage. Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer will be responsible for submitting the SWPPP to the MPCA if the conditions as noted are met or exceed. The City will require the MPCA’s review and approval of the SWPPP, if warranted, prior to the Project Proposer obtaining the NPDES/CSW permit for the Project. Comment: Item 11: “Note that the CSW permit requires that at least one inch of stormwater runoff from new impervious surfaces is retained on the Project site and not discharged to a surface water. Infiltration should be the ENCORE EAW 6 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 primary method of retaining stormwater on the Project site unless prohibited due to a high seasonal water table….it should also be noted that the existing wetlands on the Project site may not be used to manage stormwater unless they have been mitigated…” Response: The City’s ordinances and the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission require that the Project control for at least one inch of stormwater runoff from new impervious surfaces. The Project will incorporate stormwater ponds and appropriate infiltration basins throughout the site to meet these City and Watershed requirements. The existing wetlands are not part of the stormwater system designed to control for rate, quality or quantity generated as a result of the increase in impervious surfaces from development of the Project. Comment: Item 11: “The Project proposer should consider incorporating Low Impact Development methods in the Project design to limit the amount of new impervious surfaces that require stormwater treatment…” Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is working with the City to identify appropriate Low Impact Development methods into the Project including narrower street widths to reduce impervious surfaces, and the preservation of open space. Comment: Item 11: “The SWPPP for the Project will need to identify how the wetlands at the Project site will be protected during construction. An undisturbed 50-foot natural buffer must be maintained around the wetlands at all times, including as a permanent feature post construction. If this buffer must be encroached due to necessity to complete the Project, then redundant (double) down gradient sediment controls will be required during construction. These requirements must be documented in the SWPPP. Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer will identify methods for protecting wetland areas and wetland buffers in the SWPPP. Proper identification of delineated wetlands and mandatory wetland buffer widths will be documented in the SWPPP. 4. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comment: Item 10: “…does not clearly describe the glacial materials that underlie the site. Please describe in more detail.” Response: The Minnesota Geologic Survey Atlas Plate 3 Surficial Geology identifies that the majority of the surficial geology as Loamy Till which is further defined as loam in texture with few beds and lenses of stratified sediment. Underlain by Superior lobe stratified sediment or till generally at a depth of more than 50 feet in the western part of Hennepin County. Includes smaller areas of thick, fine, loamy colluvium. Small pockets of Organic Deposits are also identified primarily near or under existing wetland areas. Some small pockets of Lacustrine Sand and Silt as well as Clayey and Sandy Till are present near the perimeter of the Project boundaries. ENCORE EAW 7 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 Per the Minnesota Geologic Survey Atlas Plate 9 Geologic Survey identifies that the Project site contains shale-rich Des Moines lobe deposits. This Project is not located on a site which has been identified as a potential source for aggregate. Comment: Item 11: “…incorrectly states that there are no DNR Public Waters on the Project parcels. It should be noted that portions of Public Water Wetlands 27031900 and 27031800…are located within the Project parcel boundaries. Should impacts be proposed, coordination with the DNR should occur prior to work, to discuss potential impacts and need for a Work in Waters Permit from the DNR.” Response: Comment noted. EAW item 10 should identify the presence of the two PWI wetlands as noted in the provided comment. The Project Proposer will be required to complete a wetland delineation at which time any potential impacts will be identified. If any impacts to the PWI wetlands are proposed, the Project Proposer will be required to obtain proper permits and approvals prior to any work commencing on or near the affected wetlands. Comment: Item 11: “…It is likely that additional wells will be found during the development of the site. These wells will need to be sealed in accordance with the regulations of the Minnesota Department of Health.” Response: The City will require the Project Proposer to seal any wells found during the site construction process according to the regulations of the Minnesota Department of Health. The City will include this as a condition of any Project development approval. Comment: Item 11: “…does not describe whether the project will require a DNR Water Appropriation Permit. Project proposers should be aware that a Water Appropriation Permit is required for dewatering that occurs in volumes that exceed 10,000 gallons per day, or one million gallons per year…” Response: Based on site conditions and planned Project construction activities the Project Proposer does not anticipate that a Water Appropriation Permit will be needed. It is noted and understood that if dewatering is necessary for Project construction, and such dewatering exceeds 10,000 gallons per day, that a Water Appropriation Permit must be obtained prior to construction. At this time permanent dewatering of the Project site post construction is not planned or anticipated. As part of the Project homes will be designed with and without basements, and home sites that may be prone to flooding due to shallow depth to groundwater and/or proximity to wetlands and floodplain areas will be designed without basements. Comment: Item 11: “…please note that the total gallons per capita demand of 350 gallons per day for the development was overestimated. The City of Maple Grove Water Supply Plan has indicated that the average total gallons per capita demand for Maple Grove between 2006 and 2016 was 129.6 gallons per day – a volume that is less than half of that listed in the document.” ENCORE EAW 8 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 Response: Comment noted. The City uses a higher average per capita rate that accounts for commercial and industrial uses within the estimated rate calculation. Because the Project at this time is planned as residential, the City acknowledges that the calculated gallons per capita demanded identified in the EAW is overestimated. However, the EAW item includes reference and consideration of the adjacent Commercial and Industrial Outlots that would also be served/accounted for within the estimated demand provided in the EAW response. Comment: “We appreciate that the City of Corcoran recognizes the importance of the Maple-Basswood forest, and that this area will be preserved within the development….In addition, please consider planting with species that are pollinator friendly, as many pollinator species such as bees and butterflies.” Response: The City will require a landscape plan as part of the development review process and will offer suggestions to the Project Proposer to consider pollinator friendly plantings as part of the landscape plan. 5. Minnesota Department of Transportation Comment: “…has no comments, as the proposed project should have little or no impact on MnDOT’s highway system.” Response: Comment noted. 6. Hennepin County Comment: Item 18: Transportation Summary Trip Distribution • This EAW needs to include adjacent planned and programmed roadway projects in the forecasted trip distribution…. Brockton Lane Interchange, westerly extension of 610 as a Minor Arterial to connect to CSAH 30, as well as the Fletcher Bypass…” • It is unclear if large adjacent planned redevelopments such as ‘Laurel Creek’ were included in factoring future year forecasts. If not currently included, this should be added to the 2024 forecast, and any further out forecasts. Response: The Brockton Lane interchange will not have significant effect on project trip distribution. Although the traffic patterns will change as a result of the new interchange, the main direction of travel to/from I-94 will be along CSAH 30 since more origins/destination lie to/from the east, not so much to/from the west on I- 94. The change in traffic patterns for future scenarios will not result in materially different analysis conclusions. ENCORE EAW 9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 The Laurel Creek development was not specifically included in future year forecasts. The City directed the study to assume a 2% per year increase in background growth. The 2% per year is sufficient for Laurel Creek and other developments in the study area. Comment: Item 18: Transportation Summary Traffic Operations • Recent traffic counts used here may have been greatly impacted by shifting travel patterns…This may have distorted current and future assumptions. Hennepin County has some additional traffic counts and recent forecast data which could be shared upon request. • It is our understanding that existing conditions at both intersections CSAH 116@CSAH 30 and CSAH 101@CSAH 30 are experiencing significant vehicular queues on the EB and SB approaches during the am peak, and WB and NB approaches during the pm peak hour. We suggest that additional field observation(s) may be necessary here in the peak hours. Response: The traffic study performed analysis based on data counted as part of this effort. We would be open to re-examine if the County provides additional traffic counts, but we believe it is not likely that traffic construction occurring six miles from the site will result in materially different traffic volumes. Based on observation of video taking during data collection, queues were not noticeably longer than those calculated during analysis. We would be happy to share the videos with the County. Based on field observations, queues do not extend beyond existing turn lane storage lengths. Comment: Item 18: Transportation Summary Trip Generation • Using Senior Adult Housing for trip generation rates may not be the best estimate of trips from the development….It would seem incongruent to state that daily trips will be significantly less than a single family neighborhood when this project is proposing 2-3 car garages for every unit. We would suggest using information based on other similar senior adult developments that have been built elsewhere in the U.S. Response: Historically, empty nest buyers continue to want a minimum of 2 stalls in their garages for the use of storing cars and other items. The number of garages in an empty nest community has not been a strong indicator of trip generation. Historically, “active adult communities” have been developed and built throughout the country for 70 years. The ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition provides trip generation estimates based on actual traffic studies of these communities. Comment: Item 18: Transportation Summary General • Recommend adding traffic analysis corresponding to the county standard 20-year forecast window • It is noted that a separate traffic study will be required for any development of the adjacent industrial and commercial outlots are proposed for development ENCORE EAW 10 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 • The County is interested in more details regarding how future need for ‘dial-a-ride’ transit service will be provided since the Project is outside the existing metro mobility service area. Response: The City of Corcoran does not require 20-year analysis for a TIA because the accuracy and therefore the value of projecting over such a long term is questionable. The City and Project Proposer understand that a separate traffic analysis and/or study will be required when a development plan and user have been identified on the commercial and industrial outlots. At this time, no user has been identified and therefore general estimates were accounted for within the EAW item response. The traffic study does not include analysis or consideration of a ‘dial-a-ride’ services and this is typically outside the scope of a traffic study. The City will address transit services, including dial-a-ride services, as a part of its Comprehensive Plan Update process in compliance with the Metropolitan Council’s system statement for the community. Comment: Item 18: Transportation “Require full turn lanes for any and all proposed access(es) to the county roads. Request acknowledgement of this requirement. These improvements are viewed as necessary, not only from an operations standpoint, but as mitigation of safety concerns with the need to remove slowing or stopped turning vehicles from higher speed thru movements. Bypass lanes are no longer acceptable as mitigation for new developments on Hennepin County Roads. Response: The traffic study concluded that turn lanes are required at the two County Road 101 intersections (100th Avenue North and Stieg Road). The Project Proposer has proposed to build these at their own cost, even though a turn lane at Stieg Road is needed at the current time. The City is evaluating options for potentially adding turn lanes at County Road 116 and Hunters Ridge at some point in the future if and when it becomes necessary. Comment: Item 18: Transportation “The presently proposed access along CSAH 101 would not meet the county required access spacing guidelines. While we would allow the 1st phase access at 100th Avenue, one, if not all of the following options will likely be necessary prior to full buildout in order to accommodate adequate access spacing…” Response: City staff has meet with Hennepin County to discuss the current access spacing issues along CSAH 101 between CSAH 30 and the planned CR-117 improvements in Rogers. With the exception of 101st Ave N to the City of Maple Grove, a minimum spacing of 1/3 of a mile can be attained between CSAH-30, 100th Ave N (E/W), Stieg Rd (W), future road to KOA/temple (E), future road to Scherber parcel (W), and the planned CR-117 intersection. ENCORE EAW 11 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 The County’s future plan for CSAH-101 is a 3-lane road with a dedicated left turn. The identified layout aligns with that lane structure. Additionally, significant wetlands are located on each side of CSAH 101 at offsetting locations which will impact the feasibility of meeting the required access spacing guidelines. Regulators will require a review of alternatives to first avoid any wetland impacts and ultimately minimize impacts. This will be problematic. The City of Corcoran has no objection to the closure of 101st Ave N at CSAH 101 into the City of Maple Grove, but beyond that the process is out of the City’s control. Comment: Item 18: Transportation “Future phase access to CSAH 30 will also need to be coordinated with both municipal and county staff. The future access would be located approximately 2000’ west of the intersection with CSAH 101. We may want to direct this even further to the west, perhaps a ½ mile spacing so as to direct any and all future redevelopment to the half way point between CSAHG 101 and CSAH 116. It is our belief that CSAH 30 may serve a greater role in the regional transportation system in the future and we should direct access accordingly.” Response: The conceptually shown ghost platted access meets County access management spacing guidelines. When the City receives development applications for these properties, a discussion can take place about balancing the various factors in such a decision such as land uses, wetlands, property boundaries, site visibility, and access spacing. Comment: Item 18: Transportation “Cross access easements will be necessary with adjacent parcels…so that any other future redevelopments (industrial, commercial or residential) will be able to direct any and all access internally….this should go a step further with ‘ghost platting’ to include some of the adjacent outlots and exception parcels.” Response: The Encore Project as proposed does not preclude the extension of internal streets in the future to serve the adjacent properties. When these adjacent properties come forward with development applications, the City will initiate discussion regarding appropriate access. Comment: Item 18: Transportation Summary of Right-of-Way, Drainage and Natural Resource Protection • Request provide 65’ of right-of-way from county road center-line plus 10’ drainage and utility easement • Roadside drainage ditches maintained and drain tile from old agricultural fields removed from ROW • Old driveways removed from ROW • Every effort should be made to minimize any impact or fragmentation to the Maple-basswood forest Response: ENCORE EAW 12 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 The Project Proposer will be required to dedicate right-of-way as part of the development approval process. The City will transmit the preliminary and final plat for the Project to appropriate Hennepin County staff during the development review process for review and comment. Project approvals will include a demolition and site preparation plan that will identify driveway removal and right-of-way restoration. The City has concerns with unilaterally removing all existing draintile from the ROW. Record plan information is not available for most of these systems and the likelihood of significant drainage implications are high. A reasonable effort will be made to understand the drainage system and any draintile that is determined to be unnecessary will be removed. As noted within various EAW responses, site construction best management practices will be implemented to protect important natural resources and features onsite including wetlands and the Maple-Basswood forest to ensure they remain an amenity to the development. 7. Metropolitan Council Comment: Item 8: Permits and Approvals Required “…at the time the project proposer makes application to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for a permit to construct each segment of sanitary sewer for the proposed project, a copy of the plans, design data, and a location map of the project will also need to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council. The Council’s Environmental Service Engineering Programs staff will need to review, comment, and issue a nonobjection decision relative to issuance of the construction permit…” Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer will submit the required information to the Metropolitan Council’s Environmental Service Engineering Programs staff for review and comment concurrently to the MPCA application. Comment: Item 9: Land Use “…the proposed development will require a comprehensive plan amendment, which will need to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and authorization…Based on this information, the proposed concept does not appear to be meeting minimum density allowed in the Low Density Residential…” Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer has submitted an application requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the City for the Project, and if approved by the City Council will be sent to the Metropolitan Council for review and authorization. The City will require that the proposed Project meet the required minimum net density for the City’s Low Density Residential land use designation. Comment: Item 11: Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources “…Council staff recommends, consistent with MnDNR impact minimization guidance, that sloping, surmountable curbing be utilized on the project.” Response: Comment noted. ENCORE EAW 13 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 III. FINDINGS OF FACT a. Project Description The Encore Project (“Project”) is a new neighborhood for active seniors aged 55 and older. The Project will be located on approximately 216-acres in the City of Corcoran. The neighborhood will be developed with between 393 and 420 detached villa townhomes with a large private amenity center. The Project includes neighborhood parks and open spaces, trail connections, protected wetlands and a small commercial area. Future Outlots will include light industrial and additional commercial uses. b. Corrections to the EAW EAW Item 11 Water resources, subsection (a)(i) should be corrected to state that two DNR public waters inventory wetlands identified as 27031900 and 27031800 are partially located onsite. ENCORE EAW 14 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 IV. DECISION REGARDING NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT a. Type, Extent and Reversibility of Impacts The City of Corcoran finds that the analysis completed for the EAW is adequate to determine whether the Project has the potential for significant environmental impacts. The EAW described the type and extent of impacts anticipated to result from the proposed Project. This document provides clarifications and summarizes the dominant and recurring issues within the EAW. Water resources; Fish, wildlife, plant communities and sensitive ecological resources (rare features); and Transportation were the three items within the EAW and within comments received that were found to be potentially impacted by the proposed Project. By following the mitigation outlined within the EAW and in the response to comments, the impacts will be avoided, minimized, and/or mitigated. b. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects The proposed Encore Project is located in an area designated to be developed with a mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses all served with municipal and regional utilities in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The surrounding area is guided for development that will be consistent with the level of intensity as proposed within the Project, but currently remains developed with primarily rural residential uses. Future development may require an update to this EAW or the completion of a new EAW depending on the scope and scale of the proposed development. c. Extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by on-going public regulatory authority The mitigation of environmental impacts will be designed and implemented in coordination with the applicable regulatory agencies. All mitigation efforts will be subject to the plan approval and permitting process. Permits and approvals that have been obtained, or those that may be required prior to construction are identified on Table 2. Table 2: Permits and Approvals Permit Agency Action Required EAW City of Corcoran Approval EIS Decision City of Corcoran Approval Access Permit Hennepin County Permit ROW Permit Washington County Permit NPDES Construction Permit MPCA Permit Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit MPCA, Metropolitan Council Permit Water Supply Connection Minnesota Department of Health Permit Wetland Delineation City of Corcoran, Elm Creek Watershed Approval Wetland Mitigation City of Corcoran, Elm Creek Watershed Approval, Permit Land Disturbance and Erosion and City of Corcoran Permit ENCORE EAW 15 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 Sediment Control Permit Development Application - PUD City of Corcoran Approval Stormwater Review City of Corcoran, Elm Creek Watershed Approval d. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs. The City finds: 1. The proposed Project is reasonably similar to other age restricted senior single-family detached housing projects in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Other projects of similar scope, accompanied by similar land use, natural resources, surface water, traffic studies, and associated mitigation, have, in general, successfully mitigated potential environmental impacts. 2. The EAW, in conjunction with this document, contains or references the known studies that provide information or guidance regarding environmental effects that can be anticipated and controlled for this Project. 3. No EIS that addresses a similarly sized project is known to be available in the City of Corcoran or the surrounding area. 4. In light of the results of environmental review and permitting processes for similar projects, the City of Corcoran finds that the environmental effects of the Project can be adequately anticipated and controlled. Based on the original EAW, comments received from agencies and individuals, the responses to comments, and the criteria above, the City of Corcoran finds that the Encore Project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects and does not require the preparation of an EIS. ENCORE EAW 16 Findings of Fact and Conclusions | April 2018 V. RECORD OF DECISION Based on the EAW, the Response to Comments and the Findings of Fact, the City of Corcoran City Council concludes the following: 1. All requirements for environmental review of the proposed project have been met. 2. The EAW and the development processes related to the Project have generated information which is adequate to determine whether the Project has the potential for significant environmental effects. 3. Areas where potential environmental effects have been identified have included proper mitigative responses to be included within the final design of the Project. Mitigation will be required to be provided where impacts are expected to result from Project construction, operation or maintenance. Mitigative measures will be required to be incorporated into project design, and have been or will be coordinated with state and federal agencies during the applicable permit process. 4. Based on the criteria in Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, the Project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required for the proposed Encore development Project. Attachment 1 Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC Environmental Assessment Worksheet Authorized for Distribution by the City Council and dated March 5, 2018 (Incorporated By Reference) Attachment 2 Comment Letters Received by City of Corcoran Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Ecological and Water Resources 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Ecological and Water Resource 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 April 5, 2018 Transmitted Electronically Kendra Kindahl City Planner 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Re: Encore EAW Dear Kendra Kindahl, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Encore residential development. We offer the following comments for your consideration. Page 16 does not clearly describe the glacial materials that underlie the site. Please describe in more detail. Page 18 incorrectly states that there are no DNR Public Waters on the Project parcels. It should be noted that portions of Public Water Wetlands 27031900 and 27031800, listed in Table 1, are located within the Project parcel boundaries. Based on information provided in the EAW, there does not appear to be any planned impacts to these wetlands, however, the project proposers should be aware of their designation on site and avoid impacts. Should impacts be proposed, coordination with the DNR should occur prior to work, to discuss potential impacts and the need for a Work in Waters Permit from the DNR. Please contact Area Hydrologist Jason Spiegel (Jason.spiegel@state.mn.us) regarding any potential impact to these wetlands. Page 20. It is likely that additional wells will be found during the development of the site. These wells will need to be sealed in accordance with the regulations of the Minnesota Department of Health. Page 24 does not describe whether the project will require a DNR Water Appropriation Permit. Project proposers should be aware that a Water Appropriation Permit is required for dewatering that occurs in volumes that exceed 10,000 gallons per day, or one million gallons per year. Such a permit may be required for activities such as construction dewatering for utilities, sewer placement, construction of basements, and/or construction of the onsite stormwater pond. If permanent dewatering is required to keep basements dry, then additional Water Appropriation Permits may be required if volumes exceed those mentioned above. The DNR encourages the use of storm water for irrigating landscaping. The use of the storm water from ponds that are designed and constructed in upland areas is exempt from the requirement to obtain a DNR Water Appropriation Permit. Please contact Appropriation Hydrologist Joe Richter (joe.richter@state.mn.us) with any questions regarding the need for Appropriations Permits. Page 24, please note that the total gallons per capita demand of 350 gallons per day for the development was over estimated. The City of Maple Grove Water Supply Plan has indicated that the average total gallons per capita demand for Maple Grove between 2006 and 2016 was 129.6 gallons per day – a volume that is less than half of that listed in the document. 2 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Ecological and Water Resources 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 We appreciate that the City of Corcoran recognizes the importance of the Maple-Basswood forest, and that this area will be preserved within the development. In addition to providing habitat, it is likely a feature that residents will enjoy. Most native species should be able to withstand the climate of the landscaped community, and if chosen, would likely cut down on maintenance, such as mowing and watering, while also providing additional habitat for wildlife. In addition, please consider planting with species that are pollinator friendly, as many pollinator species such as bees and butterflies are in decline. On behalf of the DNR, thank you for consideration of these comments. Sincerely, /s/ Rebecca Horton Region Environmental Assessment Ecologist CC: Joe Richter, Jason Spiegel From:Carlson, Ben (BWSR) To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:EAW - Encore - Corcoran Date:Tuesday, April 10, 2018 11:22:43 AM Kendra, comments from BWSR regarding the Encore EAW in Corcoran. Our main concern in any project is wetlands are how they’ll be regulated and/or affected under WCA. The project proposes over 3 acres of wetland impact. This will have to be permitted for so I anticipate permit applications coming in within the next few months. Let me know if you have any questions, Thanks Ben Carlson Wetland Specialist Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 Ben.carlson@state.mn.us 651-315-3952 www.bwsr.state.mn.us From:Pansch, Joshua (DOT) To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP Cc:Kelly, Brian (DOT); Craig, E (DOT); Nelson, Douglas (DOT); Hoberg, Christian (DOT); Muhic, P Cameron (DOT); Junge, Jason (DOT); Jacobson, Nancy (DOT); Sherman, Tod (DOT); Wiltgen, Jennifer (DOT); Pansch, Joshua (DOT) Subject:EAW18-006 Encore Date:Wednesday, April 4, 2018 8:46:53 AM Good Morning, The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the above-referenced EAW for the Encore development project and has no comments, as the proposed project should have little or no impact on MnDOT’s highway system. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks Josh Pansch, Senior Planner MnDOT Metro District 1500 W. County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 (651) 234-7795 josh.pansch@state.mn.us · Cityof - - Maple Grove 12800 Arbor Lakes Parkway, P.O. Box 1180, Maple Grove, MN 55311-6180 763-494-6000 May 2, 2018 Ms. Kendra Lindahl, AICP City Planner, City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55304 Re: Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Encore Development City of Maple Grove Comments Dear Ms. Lindahl City of Maple Grove staff has reviewed the draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Encore development in Corcoran, as well as Hennepin County's response to the EA W dated April 11, 2018. In their response to the EA W, the County raised a number of concerns with the traffic proj ection methodology, which leaves the question of the congestion and Level of Service of the County Road 101 /County Road 30 intersection as yet unanswered. Regardless of the results, the potential for Encore-generated traffic to use Maple Grove residential streets to avoid the intersection remains a concern. In addition, Hennepin County raised a concern regarding access spacing, and included some proposed alternatives that require Maple Grove participation. In summary, we recommend the following actions be taken in conjunction with the development in order to mitigate traffic impacts: A. Construction of geometric improvements to County Road 101 at ioo» Avenue North that physically prevent southbound left turn and eastbound through movements onto 100th Avenue, while still allowing westbound left turns from 1 OOth Avenue onto County Road 101. These restrictions should be installed in conjunction with the County-required turn lane additions along County Road 101 at the same time as the first phase of the Encore development. These costs should be the responsibility of the development. B. Geometric improvements to the County Road 1011101 st Avenue intersection that physically prevent southbound left turn movements onto 101 st Avenue. This restriction should be in . place prior to connection of improved Stieg Road to County Road 101 in later phases of the Encore development, and the costs should be the responsibility of the development. "Serving Today, Shaping Tomorrow" AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Ms. Kendra Lindahl, AICP, City of Corcoran Page 2. C. Consideration by the City of Maple Grove, at a planning level, of relocating the collector connection that is currently 101 st A venue north to the Stieg Road alignment, accompanied by elimination of the existing 101 st Avenue connection. This is as suggested by Hennepin County to better space access points. Should such a relocation be found to be acceptable, the City of Maple Grove would only be able to physically accomplish this in the future and in conjunction with development to the east of County Road 101. Thus the current connection (and geometric changes listed in Item B above) would need to stay in place in the interim. D. A commitment by both the City of Corcoran and the City of Maple Grove to financially participate in corridor improvements along County Road 101, including intersection improvements at County Road 30, at the time that Hennepin County agrees to initiate those improvements. Hennepin County's cost sharing policy requires participation by the surrounding municipalities at a level that is approximately 50% ofproject cost (actual policy is substantially more complex, but usually results in this rule of thumb percentage). We accept the City of Corcoran's belief that congestion along County Road 101 is a regional issue that will need to be addressed by the regional authority, a.k.a. Hennepin County. Staff recommends that both Cities commit to financial participation, in the form of a Joint Powers or other agreement, such that improvements can be implemented successfully when Hennepin County initiates improvements to address the congestion at some future date. We appreciate the ability to comment on the EA Was well as the extended comment period in order to fold in Hennepin County comments as well. Should you require additional information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me. upe Hale, PE Assistant City Engineer Cc: Brad Martens, Corcoran City Administrator David Jaeger, Hennepin County Environmental Specialist Heidi Nelson, Maple Grove City Administrator Ken Ashfeld, PE, Maple Grove Public Works Director/City Engineer Dick Edwards, Maple Grove Community Development Director John Hagen, PE, Maple Grove Transportation Operations Engineer STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 11a. Council Meeting: May 10, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Action Required: Approval Summary: At the April 12, 2018 Council meeting, a resolution was approved providing for the issuance and sale of bonds for the purchase of 20400 County Road 50 and the 2018 - 2019 capital improvement plan. The amount was for approximately $1,865,000. In advance of the sale a rating call was held with Moody’s Investor Services who upgraded the City’s rating from an A1 to a Aa3. The summary included the following information: The upgrade to Aa3 is based on the city's improved financial position, with city reserves growing to a healthy level relative to budget. While ample compared with budget, reserves remain limited on a nominal basis. The Aa3 GO rating also incorporates the city's growing tax base favorably located within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, strong above average wealth levels, moderate debt burden and a modest pension burden. The full press release is attached. Also attached to this report is a draft resolution awarding the sale of the bonds which will take place the morning of May 10th. It will be updated after the sale. Tammy Omdal of Northland Securities will present the Council with specific information regarding the sale at the meeting. Financial/Budget: The total issuance is $1,865,000 and includes funds for the purchase of 20400 County Road 50 and the 2018-2019 capital improvement plan. Debt service will be paid by the property taxes. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: Fiscal Responsibility We believe that the prudent stewardship and opportunistic investment of public funds is essential for confidence in government and to position the City for future success. Responsible Decision Making Page 2 We believe it is the responsibility of the City to address difficult issues now in order to avoid larger more difficult issues in the future. Options: 1. Approve Resolution 2018-37 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A 2. Decline the sale. Recommendation: Approve Resolution 2018-37 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Council Action: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 2018-37 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Attachments: 1. Moody’s Investors Service Press Release 2. Resolution 2018-37 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Corcoran, MN's GO to Aa3 01 May 2018 New York, May 01, 2018 -- Moody's Investors Service upgrades to Aa3 from A1 the rating on the City of Corcoran, MN's general obligation unlimited tax (GOULT) debt. Moody's also has assigned a Aa3 rating to the city's $1.9 million General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A. Following the sale the city will have $11.9 million of rated GOULT debt outstanding. RATINGS RATIONALE The upgrade to Aa3 is based on the city's improved financial position, with city reserves growing to a healthy level relative to budget. While ample compared with budget, reserves remain limited on a nominal basis. The Aa3 GO rating also incorporates the city's growing tax base favorably located within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, strong above average wealth levels, moderate debt burden and a modest pension burden. RATING OUTLOOK Outlooks are typically not assigned to local government issuers with this amount of debt. FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A UPGRADE - Significant growth of the city's tax base - Increased operating reserves and liquidity FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE - Growth in the city's debt or pension burden - Declines in operating reserves and liquidity - Deterioration of the city's tax base and resident income levels LEGAL SECURITY A portion of the Series 2018A GO bonds are expected to be paid for from tax abatements, but are ultimately secured by the city's GO pledge to levy a dedicated property tax not limited by rate or amount. USE OF PROCEEDS Proceeds of the Series 2018A bonds will finance equipment purchases and land for park development. PROFILE Corcoran is located in the northwestern portion of Twin Cities metropolitan area, approximately 20 miles from downtown Minneapolis (Aa1 negative). The city encompasses approximately 36 square miles and had 5,572 residents as of 2016 estimates. METHODOLOGY The principal methodology used in these ratings was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in December 2016. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Jennifer Bernhardt Lead Analyst Regional PFG Chicago Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 100 N Riverside Plaza Suite 2220 Chicago 60606 US JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 David Levett Additional Contact Regional PFG Chicago JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 © 2018 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.” Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 CITY OF CORCORAN HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-37 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2018A, IN THE ORIGINAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $___________; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT. BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the “City”), as follows: Section 1. Sale of Bonds. 1.01. Abatement Bonds. (a) The City has determined to undertake the acquisition of land for a new park serving City residents (the “Abatement Project”). (b) Under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, as amended, and Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, as amended (collectively, the “Abatement Act”), the City is authorized to grant a property tax abatement on specified parcels in order to accomplish certain public purposes, including the provision or construction of public facilities, and to finance such facilities through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds. (c) Pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City on April 12, 2018 (the “Abatement Resolution”) following a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council approved a property tax abatement (the “Abatements”) for certain property in the City (the “Abatement Parcels”) over a period of fifteen (15) years, in an amount sufficient to pay the principal amount of bonds issued to finance the Abatement Project in the maximum principal amount of $1,555,000. (d) In the Abatement Resolution, the City found and determined that the Abatement Project benefits the Abatement Parcels, and that the maximum principal amount of bonds to be secured by Abatements does not exceed the estimated sum of Abatements from the Abatement Parcels for the term authorized under the Abatement Resolution. (e) It is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue general obligation bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $___________ (the “Abatement Bonds”), pursuant to the Abatement Act, to provide financing for a portion of the Abatement Project. 1.02. Equipment Certificates. (a) The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301 (collectively, the “Act”), to issue its general obli gation equipment certificates of indebtedness on such terms and in such manner as the City determines to finance the purchase of items of capital equipment (the “Equipment”), subject to certain limitations contained in the Act. 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 2 (b) The City will purchase and acquire various items of Equipment, which items of Equipment and their expected costs are set forth at EXHIBIT B attached hereto, to be purchased pursuant to the Act. (c) As required by the Act, (i) the expected useful life of the Equipment is or will be at least as long as the term of the Certificates (hereinafter defined); and (ii) the principal amount of Certificates to be issued in the year 2018 will not exceed 0.25 percent of the market value of taxable property in the City, based on finalized taxable market values for 2017. (d) It is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue general obligation bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $_________ (the “Certificates”), pursuant to the Equipment Act, to provide financing for the Equipment. 1.03. Issuance of General Obligation Bonds. (a) The City Council finds it necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A (the “Bonds”), in the original aggregate principal amount of $___________, pursuant to the Abatement Act and the Equipment Act (together, the “Act”), to provide financing for the Abatement Project and the Equipment. (b) The City is authorized by Section 475.60, subdivision 2(9), of the Act to negotiate the sale of the Bonds, it being determined that the City has retained an independent financial advisor in connection with such sale. The actions of the City staff and the City’s financial advisor in negotiating the sale of the Bonds are ratified and confirmed in all aspects. 1.04. Award to the Purchaser and Interest Rates. The proposal of _________________ (the “Purchaser”) to purchase the Bonds is hereby found and determined to be a reasonable offer and is hereby accepted, the proposal being to purchase the Bonds at a price of $_________ (par amount of $___________, plus net original issue premium of $________, less underwriter’s discount of $________), plus accrued interest to date of delivery, for Bonds bearing interest as follows: Year Interest Rate Year Interest Rate 2020 2028 2021 2029 2022 2030 2023 2031 2024 2032 2025 2033 2026 2034 2027 True interest cost: ___________% 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 3 1.05. Purchase Contract. The amount proposed by the Purchaser in excess of the minimum bid shall be credited to the accounts of the Debt Service Fund hereinafter created or deposited in the accounts of the Construction Fund hereinafter created, as determined by the Administrator of the City in consultation with the City’s municipal advisor. The Administrator is directed to deposit the good faith check or deposit of the Purchaser, pending completion of the sale of the Bonds. The Mayor and City Administrator are directed to execute a contract with the Purchaser on behalf of the City. 1.06. Terms and Principal Amounts of the Bonds. The City will forthwith issue and sell the Bonds, pursuant to the Act, in the total principal amount of $___________, originally dated as of May 31, 2018, in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, numbered No. R-1, upward, bearing interest as above set forth, and maturing on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Year Amount 2020 2028 2021 2029 2022 2030 2023 2031 2024 2032 2025 2033 2026 2034 2027 (a) $_______ of the Bonds (the Abatement Bonds), maturing on February 1 in the years and the amounts set forth below, will be used to finance the construction of the Abatement Project: Year Amount Year Amount 2020 2028 2021 2029 2022 2030 2023 2031 2024 2032 2025 2033 2026 2034 2027 (b) The remainder of the Bonds in the principal amount of $_______ (the Certificates), maturing on February 1 in the years and the amounts set forth below, will be used to finance the acquisition of the Equipment: Year Amount Year Amount 2020 2025 2021 2026 2022 2027 2023 2028 2024 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 4 1.05. Optional Redemption. The City may elect on February 1, 2026, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2027. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC (as defined in Section 7 hereof) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant’s interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. Section 2. Registration and Payment. 2.01. Registered Form. The Bonds will be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 2.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond will be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first interest payment date, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1of each year, commencing February 1, 2019, to the registered owners of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the month immediately preceding such interest payment date, whether or not such day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City will appoint a bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating agent and paying agent (the “Registrar”). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto are as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar must keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar provides for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of a Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until that interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. When Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar will authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity as requested by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. Bonds surrendered upon transfer or exchange will be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 5 (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When a Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the Bond until the Registrar is satisfied that the endorsement on the Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar will incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name a Bond is registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of the Bond, whether the Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on the Bond and for all other purposes, and payments so made to a registered owner or upon the owner’s order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. The Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof for a transfer or exchange of Bonds sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. If a Bond becomes mutilated or is destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar will deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that the Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it and as provided by law, in which both the City and the Registrar must be named as obligees. Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar will be cancelled by the Registrar and evidence of such cancellation must be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it is not necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Redemption. In the event any of the Bonds are called for redemption, notice thereof identifying the Bonds to be redeemed will be given by the Registrar by mailing a copy of the redemption notice by first class mail (postage prepaid) to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books kept by the Registrar and by publishing the notice if required by law. Failure to give notice by publication or by mail to any registered owner, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of Bonds. Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided that the funds for the redemption are on deposit with the place of payment at that time. 2.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City appoints Northland Trust Services, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with the Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, the resulting corporation is authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar upon 30 days’ notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar must deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and must deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 6 principal or interest due date, without further order of this City Council, the City Administrator must transmit to the Registrar monies sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.05. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds will be prepared under the direction of the City Administrator and executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator, provided that those signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be such officer before the delivery of a Bond, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, a Bond will not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on the Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on a Bond is conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Administrator will deliver the same to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser is not obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.06. Temporary Bonds. The City may elect to deliver in lieu of printed definitive Bonds one or more typewritten temporary Bonds in substantially the form set forth in EXHIBIT A attached hereto with such changes as may be necessary to reflect more than one maturity in a single temporary bond. Upon the execution and delivery of definitive Bonds the temporary Bonds will be exchanged therefor and cancelled. Section 3. Form of Bond. 3.01. Execution of the Bonds. The Bonds will be printed or typewritten in substantially the form set forth in EXHIBIT C. 3.02. Approving Legal Opinion. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to obtain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, which is to be complete except as to dating thereof and to cause the opinion to be printed on or accompany each Bond. Section 4. Payment; Security; Pledges and Covenants. 4.01. Debt Service Fund. The Bonds will be payable from the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Debt Service Fund (the “Debt Service Fund”) hereby created. The Debt Service Fund shall be administered and maintained by the Administrator as a bookkeeping account separate and apart from all other funds maintained in the official financial records of the City. The City will maintain the following accounts in the Debt Service Fund: the “Abatement Account” and the “Equipment Account.” Amounts in the Abatement Account are irrevocably pledged to the Abatement Bonds, and amounts in the Equipment Account are irrevocably pledged to the Certificates. (a) Abatement Account. Abatements from the Abatement Parcels and ad valorem taxes levied for the Abatement Project are hereby pledged to the Abatement Account of the Debt Service Fund. There is appropriated to the Abatement Account (i) a pro rata portion of amounts over the minimum purchase price of the Bonds paid by the Purchaser, to the extent designated for deposit in the Debt Service Fund in accordance with Section 1.05 hereof; (ii) accrued interest; and (iii) capitalized interest, if any. 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 7 (b) Equipment Account. Ad valorem taxes hereinafter levied for the Equipment are hereby pledged to the Equipment Account of the Debt Service Fund. There is appropriated to the Equipment Account (i) a pro rata portion of amounts over the minimum purchase price of the Bonds paid by the Purchaser, to the extent designated for deposit in the Debt Service Fund in accordance with Section 1.05 hereof; (ii) accrued interest; and (iii) capitalized interest, if any. 4.02. Project Fund. The City hereby creates the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Fund (the “Fund”). The City will maintain the following accounts in the Fund: the “Abatement Account” and the “Equipment Account”. Amounts in the Abatement Account are irrevocably pledged to the Abatement Bonds, and amounts in the Equipment Account are irrevocably pledged to the Certificates. (a) Abatement Account. Proceeds of the Abatement Bonds, less the appropriations made in Section 4.01(a) hereof, together with any other funds appropriated for the Abatement Project, will be deposited in the Abatement Account of the Fund to be used solely to defray expenses of the Abatement Project. When the Abatement Project has been acquired and the cost thereof paid, the Abatement Account of the Fund is to be closed and any funds remaining may be deposited in the Abatement Account of the Debt Service Fund. (b) Equipment Account. Proceeds of the Certificates, less the appropriations made in Section 4.01(b) hereof, together with any other funds appropriated for the Equipment will be deposited in the Equipment Account of the Fund to be used solely to defray expenses of the Equipment. When the Equipment has been acquired and the cost thereof paid, the Equipment Account of the Fund is to be closed and any subsequent collections of ad valorem taxes for the Equipment are to be deposited in the Equipment Account of the Debt Service Fund. 4.03. General Obligation Pledge. For the prompt and full payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds, as the same respectively become due, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City will be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. If the balance in the Debt Service Fund is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on the Bonds and any other bonds payable therefrom, the deficiency will be promptly paid out of monies in the general fund of the City which are available for such purpose, and such general fund may be reimbursed with or without interest from the Debt Service Fund when a sufficient balance is available therein. 4.04. Pledge of Tax Levy. For the purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the Certificates and a portion of the interest on the Abatement Bonds, there is levied a direct annual irrepealable ad valorem tax (the “Taxes”) upon all of the taxable property in the City, which will be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general taxes of the City. The Taxes will be credited to the Abatement Account and the Equipment Account of the Debt Service Fund above provided and will be in the years and amounts as attached hereto as EXHIBIT D. 4.05. Certification to Taxpayer Services Division Manager as to Debt Service Fund Amount. It is hereby determined that the estimated collections of Abatements from the Abatement Parcels and Taxes will produce at least five percent (5%) in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds. The tax levy herein provided is irrepealable until all of the Bonds are paid, provided that at the time the City makes its annual tax levies the City Administrator may certify to the Taxpayer Services Division Manager of Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Taxpayer Services Division Manager”) the amount available in the Debt Service Fund to pay principal and interest due during the ensuing year, and the Taxpayer Services Division Manager will thereupon reduce the levy collectible during such year by the amount so certified. 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 8 4.06. Registration of Resolution. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Taxpayer Services Division Manager and to obtain the certificate required by Section 475.63 of the Act. Section 5. Authentication of Transcript. 5.01. City Proceedings and Records. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other certificates, affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in their custody and under their control, relating to the validity and marketability of the Bonds, and such instruments, including any heretofore furnished, may be deemed representations of the City as to the facts stated therein. 5.02. Certification as to Official Statement. The Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the Official Statement prepared and circulated in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Official Statement is a complete and accurate representation of the facts and representations made therein as of the date of the Official Statement. 5.03. Other Certificates. The Mayor and the City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to furnish to the Purchaser at the closing such certificates as are required as a condition of sale. Unless litigation shall have been commenced and be pending questioning the Bonds or the organization of the City or incumbency of its officers, at the closing the Mayor and the City Administrator shall also execute and deliver to the Purchaser a suitable certificate as to absence of material litigation, and the City Administrator shall also execute and deliver a certificate as to payment for and delivery of the Bonds. Section 6. Tax Covenant. 6.01. Tax-Exempt Bonds. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the Bonds. 6.02. No Rebate Required. (a) The City will comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the Bonds under Section 103 of the Code, including without limitation requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States, if the Bonds (together with other obligations reasonably expected to be issued in calendar year 2018) exceed the small-issuer exception amount of $5,000,000. (b) For purposes of qualifying for the small issuer exception to the federal arbitrage rebate requirements, the City finds, determines and declares that the aggregate face amount of all 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 9 tax-exempt bonds (other than private activity bonds) issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued and outstanding at one time is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000, all within the meaning of Section 148(f)(4)(D) of the Code. 6.03. Not Private Activity Bonds. The City further covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to cause or permit them or any of them to be used, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to b e “private activity bonds” within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 6.04. Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations. In order to qualify the Bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the Bonds are not “private activity bonds” as defined in Section 141 of the Code; (b) the City hereby designates the Bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2018 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2018 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. 6.05. Procedural Requirements. The City will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. Section 7. Book-Entry System; Limited Obligation of City. 7.01. Depository Trust Company. The Bonds will be initially issued in the form of a separate single typewritten or printed fully registered Bond for each of the maturities set forth in Section 1.06 hereof. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of each Bond will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns (“DTC”). Except as provided in this section, all of the outstanding Bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. 7.02. Participants. With respect to Bonds registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent will have no responsibility or obligation to any broker dealers, banks and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository (the “Participants”) or to any other person on behalf of which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds, including but not limited to any responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any Participant or any other person (other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown by the registration books kept by the Registrar), of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of Bonds, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar as the holder 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 10 and absolute owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal, premium and interest with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all other purposes. The Paying Agent will pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or on the order of the respective registered owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, and all such payments will be valid and effectual to fully satisfy and discharge the City’s obligations with respect to payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, will receive a certificated Bond evidencing the obligation of this resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the City Administrator of a written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the words “Cede & Co.” will refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt of such a notice, the City Administrator will promptly deliver a copy of the same to the Registrar and Paying Agent. 7.03. Representation Letter. The City has heretofore executed and delivered to DTC a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations (the “Representation Letter”) which shall govern payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and notices with respect to the Bonds. Any Paying Agent or Registrar subsequently appointed by the City with respect to the Bonds will agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the City in the Representation Letter with respect to the Registrar and Paying Agent, respectively, to be complied with at all times. 7.04. Transfers Outside Book-Entry System. In the event the City, by resolution of the City Council, determines that it is in the best interests of the persons having beneficial interests in the Bonds that they be able to obtain Bond certificates, the City will notify DTC, whereupon DTC will notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of Bond certificates. In such event the City will issue, transfer and exchange Bond certificates as requested by DTC and any other registered owners in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event, if no successor securities depository is appointed, the City will issue and the Registrar will authenticate Bond certificates in accordance with this resolution and the provisions hereof will apply to the transfer, exchange and method of payment thereof. 7.05. Payments to Cede & Co. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as a Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond will be made and given, respectively in the manner provided in DTC’s Operational Arrangements, as set forth in the Representation Letter. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. 8.01. Execution of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. “Continuing Disclosure Certificate” means that certain Continuing Disclosure Certificate executed by the Mayor and City Administrator and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof. 8.02. City Compliance with Provisions of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, failure of the City to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Certificate is not to be considered an event of default with respect to the Bonds; however, any Bondholder may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 11 seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this section. Section 9. Defeasance. When all Bonds and all interest thereon have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds will cease, except that the pledge of the full faith and credit of the City for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will remain in full force and effect. The City may discharge all Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full. If any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. Section 10. Payment of Issuance Expenses. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Northland Trust Services, Inc. on the closing date for further distribution as directed by Issuer’s municipal advisor. 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 12 ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, this 10th day of May, 2018. _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Administrator 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 13 Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in said City on May 10, 2018, commencing at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: *** *** *** The Mayor announced that the next order of business was consideration of the proposals which had been received for the purchase of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $_________. The City Administrator presented a tabulation of the proposals that had been received in the manner specified in the Terms of Proposal for the Bonds. The proposals were as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached. The resolution was presented by Member ___________, who moved its adoption; The motion for the adoption of the consent agenda was duly seconded by Member __________, and upon vote being taken thereon the following members voted in favor of the motion: and the following voted against: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 A-1 EXHIBIT A PROPOSALS 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 B-1 EXHIBIT B LIST OF EQUIPMENT Department Equipment Police: Squad – SUV Ford Explorer Squad – SUV Ford Explorer Replacement AED’s Support/protection equipment Safe for Department $ 43,500 43,500 15,000 17,100 3,500 Administration: Single Axle Dump Truck Hydroseeder Vac Trailer 218,761 17,000 70,000 Police: Squad – SUV Ford Explorer Support/protection equipment Front end loader 43,500 10,000 228,000 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 C-1 EXHIBIT C FORM OF BOND No. R-_____ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA $_________ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF CORCORAN GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND SERIES 2018A Rate Maturity Date of Original Issue CUSIP February 1, 20__ May 31, 2018 Registered Owner: Cede & Co. The City of Corcoran, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing municipal corporation in Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “City”), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above or registered assigns, the principal sum of $__________ on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2019, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by Northland Trust Services, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Paying Agent, Transfer Agent and Authenticating Agent, or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. The City may elect on February 1, 2026, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2027. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant’s interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $___________ all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, redemption privilege, and interest rate, all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on May 10, 2018 (the “Resolution”), for the purpose of providing money to defray the expenses incurred and to be incurred for the acquisition of land for a new park, and the acquisition of various capital equipment pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, as amended, and Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815 and 412.301. The principal hereof and interest 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 C-2 hereon are payable in part from abatements collected from certain property in the City, and in part from ad valorem taxes, as set forth in the Resolution to which reference is made for a full statement of rights and powers thereby conferred. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for payment of this Bond and the City Council has obligated itself to levy additional ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City in the event of any deficiency in taxes pledged, which additional taxes may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. The City Council has designated the issue of Bonds of which this Bond forms a part as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limit allowed by the Code for the calendar year of issue. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner’s attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar will be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the home rule charter and the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required, and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional , statutory or charter limitation of indebtedness. This Bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 C-3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile or manual signatures of the Mayor and City Administrator and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: May 31, 2018 CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA (Facsimile) (Facsimile) Mayor City Administrator ______________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICES, INC. By Authorized Representative ______________________________________ ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, will be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT _________ Custodian _________ (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by entireties under Uniform Gifts or Transfers to Minors Act, State of _______________ JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ________________________________________ 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 C-4 ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ________________________________________ the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint _________________________ attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: The assignor’s signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a financial institution that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program (“STAMP”), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program (“SEMP”), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signatures Program (“MSP”) or other such “signature guarantee program” as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STEMP, SEMP or MSP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the information concerning the assignee requested below is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if this Bond is held by joint account.) Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee ________________________________________ 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 C-5 PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the principal of and interest on the within Bond has been registered on the books of the Registrar in the name of the person last noted below. Date of Registration Registered Owner Signature of Officer of Registrar Cede & Co. Federal ID #13-2555119 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 D-1 EXHIBIT D TAX LEVY SCHEDULES Tax Levy Schedule for Abatement Bonds YEAR* TAX LEVY 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 * Year tax levy collected. Tax Levy Schedule for Certificates YEAR * TAX LEVY 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 * Year tax levy collected. 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) CITY OF CORCORAN ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and Acting City Administrator of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the “City”), do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on May 10, 2018, with the original thereof on file in my office and the same is a full, true and correct copy thereof, insofar as the same relates to the issuance and sale of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $___________. WITNESS my hand as such City Administrator and the corporate seal of the City this _____ day of May, 2018. City Administrator City of Corcoran, Minnesota (SEAL) 521681v2 MNI CR100-18 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CERTIFICATE OF TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVION MANAGER AS TO TAX LEVY AND REGISTRATION I, the undersigned Ta xpayer Services Division Manager of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certify that a certified copy of a resolution adopted by the governing body of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the “City”), on May 10, 2018, levying taxes for the payment of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A (the “Bonds”), in the original aggregate principal amount of $___________, dated as of May 31, 2018, has been filed in my office and said Bonds have been entered on the register of obligations in my office and that such tax has been levied as required by law. WITNESS My hand and official seal this _____ day of ____________, 2018. TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA By Its (SEAL) STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 11b. Council Meeting: May 10, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Interfund Transfer Action Required: Approval Summary: Item 11a. awards the sale of bond for the purchase of 20400 County Road 50. The final step from a financial perspective is to allocate the Park Dedication funds as directed by the Council. The resolution attached to this report authorizes an interfund transfer to complete that step. Financial/Budget: The resolution transfers $250,000 from the Park Dedication Fund to the capital fund related to the purchase of 20400 County Road 50. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: Fiscal Responsibility We believe that the prudent stewardship and opportunistic investment of public funds is essential for confidence in government and to position the City for future success. Responsible Decision Making We believe it is the responsibility of the City to address difficult issues now in order to avoid larger more difficult issues in the future. Options: 1. Approve Resolution 2018-29 Authorizing an Interfund Transfer 2. Allocate other funds. Recommendation: Approve Resolution 2018-29 Authorizing an Interfund Transfer Council Action: Approve Resolution 2018-29 Authorizing an Interfund Transfer Attachments: 1. Resolution 2018-29 City of Corcoran May 10, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-29 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: AUTHORIZING AN INTERFUND TRANSFER WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran is in the process of issuing bonds for the purchase of property located at 20400 County Road 50; and WHEREAS, the City has approved a finance plan to pay for the purchase with tax abatement bonds and Park Dedication funds; and; WHEREAS, the City has authorized a contribution from the Park Dedication fund in the amount of $250,000; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the described interfund transfers are authorized. Fund Description Account Transfer Amount ROCKFORD SCHOOL LAND PURCHASE G 423-10100 250,000.00 PARK CAPITAL FUND G 415-10100 (250,000.00) PARK CAPITAL FUND OPERATING TRANSFER E 415-45200-720 250,000.00 ROCKFORD SCHOOL LAND PURCHASE TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUND R 423-45200-39200 (250,000.00) TOTAL 0.00 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jonathan Bottema, Jonathan Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 10th day of May 2018. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Brad Martens- City Administrator STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 11c. Council Meeting: May 10, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens, Kevin Mattson Topic: Public Hearing-2018 Dust Control Project Action Required: Hold Public Hearing; Approve project Summary: At the April 12, 2018 meeting, staff presented an overview of the 2018 dust control program including financing and timeline. The next step in the process is to hold the public hearing and consider approving the project. Below is a recap of the project. The gravel road maintenance program for the City of Corcoran includes the application of a chloride product on certain gravel roads (27 miles of our 34 miles of gravel road) for dust control. The cost of the project is estimated at $109,950 or $0.75 per linear foot which is subsidized by the City based up on different type of roads: Collector roads and neighborhood roads connecting to Collector roads: Subsidized to $0.24 per linear foot Neighborhood roads accessing paved roads: Subsidized to $0.60 per linear foot It is proposed to bill properties for the application as in years past with unpaid fees to be assessed later in the year if necessary. The percentage of the project to be assessed has been reduced overtime with incremental budget adjustments. For example, another $10,000 of general funds was allocated towards the project in 2018 reducing the per unit collector road fee from $104.98 in 2017 to $81.51 in 2018. The City received favorable bids from Norther Salt Incorporated (NSI) of $0.92/gallon for both 2018 as compared to $0.939 for 2017. Incorporating the reduction in price the City anticipates the following costs for the program in 2018. Neighborhood Road Assessment Collector/Adjacent Road Assessment Other Assessment City Share Total 2017 $10,290 $29,710 $1,575 $68,375 $109,950 Financial/Budget: Costs associated with the City’s share of the project are included in the 2018 budget. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: Efficient and Effective Service Delivery We believe providing services to residents and businesses in an efficient and effective manner makes government easier to work with and creates a business friendly environment. Page 2 Fiscal Responsibility We believe that the prudent stewardship and opportunistic investment of public funds is essential for confidence in government and to position the City for future success. Options: 1. Hold the public hearing; approve resolution 2018-38 ordering improvement of dust control treatments to be applied to city streets in 2018 as presented. 2. Hold the public hearing; approve resolution 2018-38 ordering improvement of dust control treatments to be applied to city streets in 2018 with amendments. 3. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Hold the public hearing; approve resolution 2018-38 ordering improvement of dust control treatments to be applied to city streets in 2018 as presented. Council Action: Hold the public hearing; consider a motion to approve resolution 2018-38 ordering improvement of dust control treatments to be applied to city streets in 2018 as presented. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2018-38 ordering improvement of dust control treatments to be applied to city streets in 2018 2. Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property From:John Hausladen To:Brad Martens Cc:DBjorge@catholiceldercare.org; John Hausladen Subject:Support Dust Control on Fox Valley Drive Date:Monday, May 07, 2018 1:08:54 PM Mr. Martens ... On behalf of the residents of Fox Valley Drive noted below, we are writing to support applying dust control measures to our road. Dave Bjorge (9528 Fox Valley Drive) and I (9520 Fox Valley Drive) contacted our neighbors and were given approval to share their support. We ask that this information be entered into the record as the Corcoran City Council considers this action. Please contact either of us if you have any questions Dave Bjorge 9528 Fox Valley Drive 763-420-2833 John Hausladen 9520 Fox Valley Drive 651-295-5672 Alex Gredzens 9531 Fox Valley Drive Barry Swanson 9425 Fox Valley Drive 763-420-2852 Earl Zimmerman 9515 Fox Valley Drive 763-420-2389 Tom Steinle 9400 Fox Valley Drive 763-416-9967 Chuck Monson 9433 Fox Valley Drive 763-420-2672 Jerry Shiro 9536 Fox Valley Drive 763-420-5496 Tim Jones 9507 Fox Valley Drive 763-420-3097 Agenda Item 11c. City of Corcoran May 10, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-38 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT OF DUST CONTROL TREATMENTS TO BE APPLIED TO CITY STREETS IN 2018 WHEREAS, Resolution 2018-26 of the City Council, adopted on April 12, 2018, fixed a date for a public hearing on the proposed improvement of dust control treatments to be applied to streets throughout the City as outlined in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 10th day of May, 2018, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a report from the City Administrator at the hearing indicating that the project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible, and will be best accomplished as proposed, and informing the City Council of the estimated cost of the proposed treatments; and WHEREAS, the City Administrator prepared an estimate of the total charges to the affected land owners, as well as a method for calculating costs to individual land owners, which was available at the hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Corcoran City Council: 1. The Corcoran City Council determined the improvement of the application dust control treatments necessary, cost-effective, and feasible. 2. Such improvements are hereby ordered as proposed in Exhibit A. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 10th day of May, 2018. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Brad Martens – City Administrator City of Corcoran May 10, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-38 Page 2 of 2 Exhibit A Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property HouseNumber StreetName PIN BaseCharge Road Type 8690 BECHTOLD RD 16-119-23-33-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8925 BECHTOLD RD 17-119-23-14-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8955 BECHTOLD RD 17-119-23-14-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8985 BECHTOLD RD 17-119-23-14-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9305 BECHTOLD RD 08-119-23-44-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9310 BECHTOLD RD 09-119-23-33-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9725 BECHTOLD RD 08-119-23-14-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9730 BECHTOLD RD 09-119-23-23-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9733 BECHTOLD RD 08-119-23-14-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9785 BECHTOLD RD 08-119-23-14-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9810 BECHTOLD RD 09-119-23-23-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9820 BECHTOLD RD 09-119-23-23-0007 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9845 BECHTOLD RD 08-119-23-14-0013 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9847 BECHTOLD RD 08-119-23-14-0014 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10025 BECHTOLD RD 08-119-23-11-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10060 BECHTOLD RD 09-119-23-22-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10124 BECHTOLD RD 04-119-23-33-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10165 BECHTOLD RD 05-119-23-44-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10206 BECHTOLD RD 04-119-23-33-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10214 BECHTOLD RD 04-119-23-33-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10290 BECHTOLD RD 04-119-23-32-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10515 BECHTOLD RD 05-119-23-14-0014 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10525 BECHTOLD RD 05-119-23-14-0013 $81.51 COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 10600 BECHTOLD RD 04-119-23-24-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10700 BECHTOLD RD 04-119-23-23-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10720 BECHTOLD RD 04-119-23-21-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10721 BECHTOLD RD 05-119-23-11-0007 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10725 BECHTOLD RD 05-119-23-11-0008 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10740 BECHTOLD RD 04-119-23-22-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10845 BECHTOLD RD 05-119-23-11-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10895 BECHTOLD RD 05-119-23-11-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8220 CAIN RD 23-119-23-22-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8270 CAIN RD 23-119-23-22-0010 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8300 CAIN RD 23-119-23-22-0009 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8540 CAIN RD 14-119-23-33-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8695 CAIN RD 15-119-23-44-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8707 CAIN RD 15-119-23-41-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8722 CAIN RD 14-119-23-31-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8810 CAIN RD 14-119-23-32-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8825 CAIN RD 15-119-23-41-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9103 CAIN RD 15-119-23-14-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9201 CAIN RD 15-119-23-11-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9226 CAIN RD 14-119-23-22-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9231 CAIN RD 15-119-23-12-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9320 CAIN RD 11-119-23-33-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9400 CAIN RD 11-119-23-33-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9401 CAIN RD 10-119-23-44-0010 $81.51 COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 9403 CAIN RD 10-119-23-44-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9420 CAIN RD 11-119-23-33-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9423 CAIN RD 10-119-23-44-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9434 CAIN RD 11-119-23-33-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9437 CAIN RD 10-119-23-44-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9505 CAIN RD 10-119-23-41-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9530 CAIN RD 11-119-23-32-0009 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9580 CAIN RD 11-119-23-32-0011 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10410 CAIN RD 02-119-23-32-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10415 CAIN RD 03-119-23-41-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10420 CAIN RD 02-119-23-31-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10430 CAIN RD 02-119-23-32-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10450 CAIN RD 02-119-23-32-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10501 CAIN RD 03-119-23-14-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10540 CAIN RD 02-119-23-23-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10580 CAIN RD 02-119-23-23-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10620 CAIN RD 02-119-23-23-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10660 CAIN RD 02-119-23-23-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10855 CAIN RD 03-119-23-11-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8520 COUNTY RD 19 18-119-23-43-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 20755 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-41-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21020 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-13-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21030 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-13-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21033 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-42-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 21050 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-24-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21070 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-24-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21090 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-24-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21124 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-21-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21150 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-24-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21200 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-24-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21250 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-24-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21300 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-23-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21404 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-22-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21407 HORSESHOE TRL 34-119-23-32-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7340 KALK RD 27-119-23-24-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7360 KALK RD 27-119-23-24-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7400 KALK RD 27-119-23-24-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7450 KALK RD 27-119-23-21-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7500 KALK RD 27-119-23-21-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7620 KALK RD 27-119-23-21-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7705 KALK RD 22-119-23-33-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7710 KALK RD 22-119-23-34-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7800 KALK RD 22-119-23-34-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7801 KALK RD 22-119-23-33-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7885 KALK RD 22-119-23-33-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21000 LARKIN RD 27-119-23-13-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21025 LARKIN RD 27-119-23-42-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 21115 LARKIN RD 27-119-23-42-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21125 LARKIN RD 27-119-23-42-0007 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21201 LARKIN RD 27-119-23-31-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21300 LARKIN RD 27-119-23-23-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21301 LARKIN RD 27-119-23-23-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21400 LARKIN RD 27-119-23-23-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21420 LARKIN RD 27-119-23-23-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21500 LARKIN RD 27-119-23-23-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 21600 LARKIN RD 28-119-23-13-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6420 OLD SETTLERS RD 35-119-23-31-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6575 OLD SETTLERS RD 35-119-23-32-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6810 OLD SETTLERS RD 34-119-23-11-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6855 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-44-0007 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6900 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-44-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6904 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-44-0011 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6905 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-43-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6910 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-44-0028 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6925 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-43-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7100 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-44-0010 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7121 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-43-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7131 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-42-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7200 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-41-0007 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7203 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-42-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7250 OLD SETTLERS RD 27-119-23-41-0008 $81.51 COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 19100 SCHUTTE RD 13-119-23-14-0010 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19125 SCHUTTE RD 13-119-23-41-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19301 SCHUTTE RD 13-119-23-42-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19410 SCHUTTE RD 13-119-23-13-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19420 SCHUTTE RD 13-119-23-13-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19600 SCHUTTE RD 13-119-23-21-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19301 STIEG RD 01-119-23-44-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19319 STIEG RD 01-119-23-43-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19320 STIEG RD 01-119-23-42-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19425 STIEG RD 01-119-23-42-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19510 STIEG RD 01-119-23-21-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19520 STIEG RD 01-119-23-31-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19715 STIEG RD 01-119-23-32-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19725 STIEG RD 01-119-23-32-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19740 STIEG RD 01-119-23-23-0019 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19800 STIEG RD 01-119-23-23-0021 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19801 STIEG RD 01-119-23-32-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19850 STIEG RD 01-119-23-23-0022 $81.51 COLLECTOR 19880 STIEG RD 01-119-23-23-0023 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7970 STREHLER RD 21-119-23-42-0013 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8020 STREHLER RD 21-119-23-42-0012 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8100 STREHLER RD 21-119-23-13-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8175 STREHLER RD 21-119-23-24-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 22060 STREHLER RD 16-119-23-34-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22070 STREHLER RD 16-119-23-34-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22090 STREHLER RD 16-119-23-43-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22505 STREHLER RD 20-119-23-14-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22701 STREHLER RD 20-119-23-13-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22720 STREHLER RD 17-119-23-43-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22735 STREHLER RD 20-119-23-12-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22814 STREHLER RD 17-119-23-43-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22820 STREHLER RD 17-119-23-34-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22840 STREHLER RD 17-119-23-34-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22900 STREHLER RD 17-119-23-33-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 22903 STREHLER RD 20-119-23-22-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23020 STREHLER RD 17-119-23-32-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23110 STREHLER RD 18-119-23-44-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23120 STREHLER RD 18-119-23-44-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23212 STREHLER RD 18-119-23-44-0007 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23255 STREHLER RD 19-119-23-11-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23300 STREHLER RD 18-119-23-43-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23335 STREHLER RD 19-119-23-12-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23600 STREHLER RD 18-119-23-34-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23651 STREHLER RD 19-119-23-21-0010 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23660 STREHLER RD 18-119-23-34-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23700 STREHLER RD 18-119-23-33-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 23750 STREHLER RD 18-119-23-33-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23785 STREHLER RD 19-119-23-23-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23817 STREHLER RD 19-119-23-22-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23825 STREHLER RD 07-119-23-22-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7900 STREHLER RD 21-119-23-42-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 23825 TESSMER RD 07-119-23-21-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7875 TRAIL HAVEN RD 21-119-23-41-0010 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7905 TRAIL HAVEN RD 21-119-23-41-0009 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8095 TRAIL HAVEN RD 21-119-23-41-0008 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8175 TRAIL HAVEN RD 21-119-23-14-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8400 TRAIL HAVEN RD 22-119-23-21-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8401 TRAIL HAVEN RD 21-119-23-11-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8490 TRAIL HAVEN RD 22-119-23-22-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8645 TRAIL HAVEN RD 16-119-23-44-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8655 TRAIL HAVEN RD 16-119-23-44-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8750 TRAIL HAVEN RD 15-119-23-32-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8850 TRAIL HAVEN RD 15-119-23-32-0010 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8900 TRAIL HAVEN RD 15-119-23-32-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 8901 TRAIL HAVEN RD 16-119-23-14-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9010 TRAIL HAVEN RD 15-119-23-23-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9017 TRAIL HAVEN RD 16-119-23-14-0022 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9035 TRAIL HAVEN RD 16-119-23-14-0014 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9120 TRAIL HAVEN RD 15-119-23-22-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 9125 TRAIL HAVEN RD 16-119-23-11-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9223 TRAIL HAVEN RD 16-119-23-11-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9247 TRAIL HAVEN RD 16-119-23-11-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9415 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-44-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9425 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-44-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9435 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-44-0019 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9475 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-44-0018 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9515 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-41-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9625 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-41-0010 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9710 TRAIL HAVEN RD 10-119-23-23-0008 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9714 TRAIL HAVEN RD 10-119-23-23-0007 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9735 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-14-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9823 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-14-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9837 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-14-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9901 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-11-0008 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9933 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-11-0007 $81.51 COLLECTOR 9945 TRAIL HAVEN RD 09-119-23-11-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10035 TRAIL HAVEN RD 10-119-23-22-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10104 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-33-0006 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10150 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-33-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10170 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-33-0010 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10210 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-33-0009 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10215 TRAIL HAVEN RD 04-119-23-44-0010 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10220 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-33-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 10400 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-32-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10405 TRAIL HAVEN RD 04-119-23-41-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10410 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-32-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10440 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-32-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10500 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-32-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10600 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-23-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10690 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-22-0008 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10765 TRAIL HAVEN RD 04-119-23-11-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 10800 TRAIL HAVEN RD 03-119-23-22-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6215 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-34-0005 $40.76 COLLECTOR 6225 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-34-0002 $40.76 COLLECTOR 6280 WILLOW DR 34-119-23-33-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6300 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-44-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6315 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-42-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6320 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-44-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6330 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-44-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6501 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-41-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6603 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-13-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6620 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-14-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6655 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-13-0008 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6675 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-13-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6685 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-13-0003 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6705 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-13-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 6715 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-13-0007 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6721 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-12-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6855 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-21-0001 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6915 WILLOW DR 28-119-23-43-0009 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6925 WILLOW DR 28-119-23-43-0008 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7145 WILLOW DR 28-119-23-42-0005 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7200 WILLOW DR 28-119-23-41-0002 $81.51 COLLECTOR 7229 WILLOW DR 28-119-23-42-0004 $81.51 COLLECTOR 6221 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-34-0004 $40.76 COLLECTOR 6801 WILLOW DR 33-119-23-12-0007 $81.51 COLLECTOR 244 COLLECTOR Count 20700 70TH AVE 27-119-23-44-0022 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20730 70TH AVE 27-119-23-44-0021 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20735 70TH AVE 27-119-23-44-0025 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20740 70TH AVE 27-119-23-44-0020 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20800 70TH AVE 27-119-23-44-0019 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20807 70TH AVE 27-119-23-44-0024 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20818 70TH AVE 27-119-23-44-0018 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20833 70TH AVE 27-119-23-44-0023 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20840 70TH AVE 27-119-23-44-0017 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21400 CIRCLE LN 10-119-23-23-0004 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21401 CIRCLE LN 10-119-23-23-0006 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21410 CIRCLE LN 10-119-23-23-0003 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21415 CIRCLE LN 10-119-23-23-0005 $81.51 N GRAVEL Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 21420 CIRCLE LN 10-119-23-23-0002 $81.51 N GRAVEL 8900 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0006 $81.51 N GRAVEL 8901 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0021 $81.51 N GRAVEL 8919 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0020 $81.51 N GRAVEL 8920 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0025 $81.51 N GRAVEL 8939 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0019 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9000 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0009 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9001 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0018 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9019 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0017 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9037 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0016 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9040 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0011 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9101 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0015 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9117 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-11-0022 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9148 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-11-0010 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9200 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-11-0009 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9220 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-11-0008 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9239 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-11-0017 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9240 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-11-0007 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9259 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-11-0016 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9260 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-11-0006 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9305 FOXLINE DR 09-119-23-44-0016 $81.51 N GRAVEL 9016 FOXLINE DR 16-119-23-14-0010 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21000 GREENVIEW CT 03-119-23-43-0005 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20705 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-44-0016 $40.76 N GRAVEL Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 20715 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-44-0017 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20810 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-44-0025 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20815 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-44-0009 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20835 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-44-0008 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20840 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-44-0005 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20900 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-43-0001 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20910 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-43-0002 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20920 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-43-0003 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20925 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-44-0007 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20940 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-43-0004 $40.76 N GRAVEL 20945 HIDDEN PONDS DR 03-119-23-44-0006 $40.76 N GRAVEL 21524 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-41-0008 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21527 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-44-0007 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21536 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-41-0007 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21539 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-44-0008 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21625 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-44-0009 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21630 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-41-0011 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21635 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-44-0010 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21645 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-44-0011 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21777 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-43-0001 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21801 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-43-0007 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21850 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-42-0003 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21901 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-43-0006 $81.51 N GRAVEL Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 21920 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-31-0002 $81.51 N GRAVEL 22201 HOMESTEAD TRL 28-119-23-33-0002 $81.51 N GRAVEL 10024 MEADOW CIR 10-119-23-22-0006 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21324 MEADOW CIR 10-119-23-22-0007 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21300 MEADOW LN 10-119-23-22-0009 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21310 MEADOW LN 10-119-23-22-0008 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21313 MEADOW LN 10-119-23-22-0010 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21325 MEADOW LN 10-119-23-22-0011 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21406 MEADOW LN 10-119-23-22-0012 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21414 MEADOW LN 10-119-23-22-0004 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21417 MEADOW LN 10-119-23-22-0013 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21422 MEADOW LN 10-119-23-22-0003 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21427 MEADOW LN 10-119-23-22-0014 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21525 NYSTROM LN 28-119-23-44-0021 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21528 NYSTROM LN 28-119-23-44-0015 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21535 NYSTROM LN 28-119-23-44-0022 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21607 NYSTROM LN 28-119-23-44-0018 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21617 NYSTROM LN 28-119-23-44-0019 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21627 NYSTROM LN 28-119-23-44-0020 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21636 NYSTROM LN 28-119-23-44-0013 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21646 NYSTROM LN 28-119-23-44-0012 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20403 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-21-0005 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20411 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-21-0004 $81.51 N GRAVEL Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 20419 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-21-0003 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20500 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-22-0006 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20503 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-22-0011 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20512 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-22-0005 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20515 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-22-0010 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20600 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-22-0004 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20605 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-22-0009 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20610 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-22-0003 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20617 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-22-0008 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20624 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-22-0002 $81.51 N GRAVEL 20629 RUSH MEADOW LN 02-119-23-22-0007 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21580 SICORA LN 09-119-23-11-0003 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21600 SICORA LN 09-119-23-11-0005 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21500 TREELINE DR 16-119-23-11-0015 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21510 TREELINE DR 16-119-23-11-0014 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21515 TREELINE DR 16-119-23-14-0013 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21520 TREELINE DR 16-119-23-11-0013 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21525 TREELINE DR 16-119-23-14-0012 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21530 TREELINE DR 16-119-23-11-0012 $81.51 N GRAVEL 21540 TREELINE DR 16-119-23-11-0011 $81.51 N GRAVEL 103 N GRAVEL Count 7720 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-33-0009 $41.37 N PAVED 7745 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-33-0007 $41.37 N PAVED 7760 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-33-0010 $41.37 N PAVED Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 7770 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-33-0020 $41.37 N PAVED 7775 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-33-0024 $20.69 N PAVED 7780 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-33-0019 $20.69 N PAVED 7790 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-33-0018 $20.69 N PAVED 7800 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-33-0017 $20.69 N PAVED 7801 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-33-0023 $20.69 N PAVED 7895 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-32-0013 $20.69 N PAVED 7900 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-32-0009 $20.69 N PAVED 7950 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-32-0008 $20.69 N PAVED 7965 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-32-0012 $20.69 N PAVED 8010 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-32-0007 $20.69 N PAVED 8070 CORCORAN TRL E 23-119-23-32-0006 $20.69 N PAVED 7710 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-33-0013 $41.37 N PAVED 7715 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-33-0002 $41.37 N PAVED 7730 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-33-0006 $41.37 N PAVED 7735 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-33-0003 $41.37 N PAVED 7755 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-33-0004 $41.37 N PAVED 7780 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-33-0021 $20.69 N PAVED 7785 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-33-0014 $20.69 N PAVED 7798 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-33-0022 $20.69 N PAVED 7888 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-32-0010 $20.69 N PAVED 7915 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-32-0002 $20.69 N PAVED 8030 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-32-0011 $20.69 N PAVED Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 8055 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-32-0004 $20.69 N PAVED 8075 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-32-0005 $20.69 N PAVED 8015 CORCORAN TRL W 23-119-23-32-0003 $20.69 N PAVED 10050 JEFFREY LN 09-119-23-21-0006 $89.45 N PAVED 10140 CHAPARRAL CIRCLE 04-119-23-33-0016 $89.45 N PAVED 22105 CHAPARRAL CIRCLE 04-119-23-33-0018 $89.45 N PAVED 22112 CHAPARRAL CIRCLE 04-119-23-33-0017 $89.45 N PAVED 22195 CHAPARRAL LANE 04-119-23-33-0022 $89.45 N PAVED 22200 CHAPARRAL LANE 04-119-23-33-0006 $89.45 N PAVED 22212 CHAPARRAL LANE 04-119-23-33-0005 $89.45 N PAVED 22215 CHAPARRAL LANE 04-119-23-33-0021 $89.45 N PAVED 22218 CHAPARRAL LANE 04-119-23-33-0004 $89.45 N PAVED 22229 CHAPARRAL LANE 04-119-23-33-0020 $89.45 N PAVED 9820 CREEK VIEW CIR 08-119-23-23-0013 $93.43 N PAVED 9829 CREEK VIEW CIR 08-119-23-23-0011 $93.43 N PAVED 9400 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-43-0005 $85.71 N PAVED 9405 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-43-0006 $85.71 N PAVED 9410 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-43-0004 $85.71 N PAVED 9422 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-43-0003 $85.71 N PAVED 9425 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-43-0007 $85.71 N PAVED 9433 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-43-0008 $85.71 N PAVED 9500 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-43-0010 $85.71 N PAVED 9507 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-42-0007 $85.71 N PAVED Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 9512 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-42-0006 $85.71 N PAVED 9515 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-42-0008 $85.71 N PAVED 9520 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-42-0013 $85.71 N PAVED 9528 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-42-0012 $85.71 N PAVED 9531 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-42-0009 $85.71 N PAVED 9536 FOX VALLEY DR 09-119-23-42-0011 $85.71 N PAVED 9817 GARDEN LA 08-119-23-13-0012 $55.85 N PAVED 9709 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0015 $55.85 N PAVED 9710 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0003 $55.85 N PAVED 9724 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0004 $55.85 N PAVED 9725 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0014 $55.85 N PAVED 9732 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0005 $55.85 N PAVED 9800 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0006 $55.85 N PAVED 9820 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0007 $55.85 N PAVED 9823 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0011 $55.85 N PAVED 9830 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0008 $55.85 N PAVED 9837 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0010 $55.85 N PAVED 9840 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-13-0009 $55.85 N PAVED 9927 GARDEN LN 08-119-23-12-0004 $55.85 N PAVED 8715 GARRISON LN 18-119-23-41-0002 $128.67 N PAVED 23110 GARRISON RD 18-119-23-41-0007 $128.67 N PAVED 23120 GARRISON RD 18-119-23-41-0006 $128.67 N PAVED 23210 GARRISON RD 18-119-23-41-0005 $128.67 N PAVED Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 23216 GARRISON RD 18-119-23-41-0004 $128.67 N PAVED 10105 JEFFREY LN 04-119-23-33-0023 $89.45 N PAVED 10108 JEFFREY LN 04-119-23-33-0019 $89.45 N PAVED 10205 JEFFREY LN 04-119-23-33-0007 $89.45 N PAVED 10213 JEFFREY LN 04-119-23-33-0008 $89.45 N PAVED 10218 JEFFREY LN 04-119-23-33-0009 $89.45 N PAVED 10221 JEFFREY LN 04-119-23-32-0004 $89.45 N PAVED 23105 LARSEN RD 17-119-23-33-0001 $128.67 N PAVED 23107 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-44-0004 $128.67 N PAVED 23110 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-41-0008 $128.67 N PAVED 23119 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-44-0003 $128.67 N PAVED 23120 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-41-0009 $128.67 N PAVED 23205 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-44-0002 $128.67 N PAVED 23217 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-44-0001 $128.67 N PAVED 23230 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-41-0003 $128.67 N PAVED 23303 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-43-0008 $128.67 N PAVED 23315 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-43-0007 $128.67 N PAVED 23327 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-43-0006 $128.67 N PAVED 23405 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-43-0005 $128.67 N PAVED 23417 LARSEN RD 18-119-23-43-0004 $128.67 N PAVED 10503 Maple Lane 06-119-23-13-0025 $55.06 N PAVED 10512 Maple Lane 06-119-23-13-0016 $55.06 N PAVED 10517 Maple Lane 06-119-23-13-0024 $55.06 N PAVED Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 10613 Maple Lane 06-119-23-13-0007 $55.06 N PAVED 10625 Maple Lane 06-119-23-13-0008 $55.06 N PAVED 10650 Maple Lane 06-119-23-13-0023 $55.06 N PAVED 10627 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0009 $55.06 N PAVED 10630 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0017 $55.06 N PAVED 10631 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0010 $55.06 N PAVED 10634 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0018 $55.06 N PAVED 10635 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0011 $55.06 N PAVED 10638 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0019 $55.06 N PAVED 10639 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0012 $55.06 N PAVED 10642 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0020 $55.06 N PAVED 10643 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0013 $55.06 N PAVED 10646 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0021 $55.06 N PAVED 10647 Maple Lane East 06-119-23-13-0014 $55.06 N PAVED 9710 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-24-0008 $93.43 N PAVED 9720 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-24-0007 $93.43 N PAVED 9730 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-24-0006 $93.43 N PAVED 9733 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-23-0016 $93.43 N PAVED 9740 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-23-0009 $93.43 N PAVED 9750 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-23-0008 $93.43 N PAVED 9800 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-23-0007 $93.43 N PAVED 9815 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-23-0019 $93.43 N PAVED 9830 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-23-0006 $93.43 N PAVED Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 9836 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-23-0005 $93.43 N PAVED 9845 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-23-0010 $93.43 N PAVED 9848 RUSH CREEK BLVD 08-119-23-23-0004 $93.43 N PAVED 9710 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-13-0019 $50.00 N PAVED 9715 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-24-0009 $50.00 N PAVED 9720 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-13-0020 $50.00 N PAVED 9730 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-13-0021 $50.00 N PAVED 9733 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-24-0003 $50.00 N PAVED 9800 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-13-0022 $50.00 N PAVED 9805 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-24-0002 $50.00 N PAVED 9820 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-13-0023 $50.00 N PAVED 9825 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-24-0005 $50.00 N PAVED 9831 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-21-0012 $50.00 N PAVED 9840 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-13-0024 $50.00 N PAVED 9945 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-22-0009 $50.00 N PAVED 9950 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-12-0001 $50.00 N PAVED 9955 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-21-0016 $50.00 N PAVED 9990 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-12-0003 $50.00 N PAVED 10010 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-21-0001 $50.00 N PAVED 10020 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-21-0014 $50.00 N PAVED 10030 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-21-0015 $50.00 N PAVED 10080 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-21-0004 $50.00 N PAVED 10300 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-21-0018 $50.00 N PAVED Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 9980 SUNDANCE RD 08-119-23-12-0002 $50.00 N PAVED 22107 WOODLAND LN 04-119-23-33-0012 $89.45 N PAVED 22109 WOODLAND LN 04-119-23-33-0010 $89.45 N PAVED 22110 WOODLAND LN 04-119-23-33-0013 $89.45 N PAVED 22115 WOODLAND LN 04-119-23-33-0011 $89.45 N PAVED 22120 WOODLAND LN 04-119-23-33-0014 $89.45 N PAVED 22124 WOODLAND LN 04-119-23-33-0015 $89.45 N PAVED 148 N PAVED Count 21565 CATES LONGHORN RD 33-119-23-41-0006 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 21585 CATES LONGHORN RD 33-119-23-41-0005 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 21600 CATES LONGHORN RD 33-119-23-41-0003 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 10115 HIGHLAND RIDGE RD.03-119-23-44-0015 $20.38 N PAVED COLLECTOR 10120 HIGHLAND RIDGE RD.03-119-23-44-0020 $20.38 N PAVED COLLECTOR 10135 HIGHLAND RIDGE RD.03-119-23-44-0014 $20.38 N PAVED COLLECTOR 10150 HIGHLAND RIDGE RD.03-119-23-44-0019 $20.38 N PAVED COLLECTOR 10185 HIGHLAND RIDGE RD.03-119-23-44-0013 $20.38 N PAVED COLLECTOR 10200 HIGHLAND RIDGE RD.03-119-23-44-0018 $20.38 N PAVED COLLECTOR 10205 HIGHLAND RIDGE RD.03-119-23-44-0012 $20.38 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22314 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0010 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22317 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0012 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22344 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0009 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22355 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0011 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22385 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0023 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22393 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0022 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR Proposed Dust Control Fee by Property 22405 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0021 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22420 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0017 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22425 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0020 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22440 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0016 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22445 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0019 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22462 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0015 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22465 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-14-0018 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22485 RUSH CREEK DRIVE 05-119-23-13-0009 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 23525 STREHLER RD 19-119-23-21-0011 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22362 SUNSET LN 05-119-23-14-0008 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22408 SUNSET LN 05-119-23-14-0007 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22411 SUNSET LN 05-119-23-14-0001 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22434 SUNSET LN 05-119-23-14-0006 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22449 SUNSET LN 05-119-23-14-0002 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22472 SUNSET LN 05-119-23-14-0005 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22475 SUNSET LN 05-119-23-14-0003 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 22480 SUNSET LN 05-119-23-14-0004 $40.76 N PAVED COLLECTOR 33 N PAVED COLLECTOR Count 7800 MAPLE HILL RD 24-119-23-43-0015 $750.00 OTHER 7995 MAPLE HILL RD 24-119-23-42-0001 $525.00 OTHER Engineer’s Memo To: Kevin Mattson, P.E. Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, P.E., City Engineer Date: May 4, 2018 Subject: 2018 Pavement Overlay Project - Larkin Road and Rolling Hills Road Council Action Requested Motion to accept the plans and authorize to bid the 2018 Pavement Overlay Project using Municipal State Aid Construction funds. Background The City was planning on overlaying Larkin Road in 2018 and has since added Rolling Hills Road to the project. State Aid funds will be utilized and the $160,000 in the budget can be redirected. Improvements Improvements include pavement patching, bituminous leveling course, bituminous overlay, shouldering, and pavement marking. Estimated Cost and Schedule The total project cost is estimated at $517,870.60 for construction. Larkin Road (S.A.P. 215-103-003) is estimated at $296,056.80 and Rolling Hills Road (S.A.P. 215-115-002) is estimated at $221,813.80. Engineering, construction administration, and field testing is estimated at $35,000. Rolling Hills Road will be bid as an Alternate to allow flexibility for the City in final decision. May •May 10th - Council Accepts Plans and Authorize to Bid June •June 5th – Bid Open* •June 14th - Bid Award* *Dates are subject to change pending MSA approvals Substantial completion is targeted for October 1st, which allows for competitive pricing. End of Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com 11d. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE CITY OF CORCORAN 2018 ROLLING HILLS AND LARKIN RD OVERLAY S.A.P. 215-115-002 & 215-103-003 LINE NO.ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL PRICE 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 20,000.00$ 0.5 10,000.00$ 0.5 10,000.00$ 1 20,000.00$ 2 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 10.00$ 250 2,500.00$ 110 1,100.00$ 360 3,600.00$ 3 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 5.00$ 384 1,920.00$ 108 540.00$ 492 2,460.00$ 4 2105.507 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 15.00$ 105 1,575.00$ 30 450.00$ 135 2,025.00$ 5 2118.509 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2 TON 20.00$ 242 4,840.00$ 892 17,840.00$ 1,134 22,680.00$ 6 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 20.00$ 190 3,800.00$ 55 1,100.00$ 245 4,900.00$ 7 2232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE SQ YD 3.00$ 335 1,005.00$ 60 180.00$ 395 1,185.00$ 8 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 3.00$ 2,933 8,799.00$ 1,633 4,899.00$ 4,566 13,698.00$ 9 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE - OVERLAY TON 55.00$ 2,785 153,175.00$ 2,214 121,770.00$ 4,999 274,945.00$ 10 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE - LEVELING TON 65.00$ 1,393 90,545.00$ 644 41,860.00$ 2,037 132,405.00$ 11 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE - PATCH TON 90.00$ 60 5,400.00$ 25 2,250.00$ 85 7,650.00$ 12 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 5,000.00$ 0.5 2,500.00$ 0.5 2,500.00$ 1 5,000.00$ 13 2582.503 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 2.00$ 0 -$ 3,941 7,882.00$ 3,941 7,882.00$ 14 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 0.60$ 15,123 9,073.80$ 15,128 9,076.80$ 30,251 18,150.60$ 15 2582.503 4" BROKEN LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 0.60$ 1,340 804.00$ 610 366.00$ 1,950 1,170.00$ 16 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 10.00$ 12 120.00$ 0 -$ 12 120.00$ TOTAL BID BASE 296,056.80$ ALTERNATE 1 221,813.80$ TOTAL 517,870.60$ ROLLING HILLS RD S.A.P. 215-115-002 (ALTERNATE 1) LARKIN RD S.A.P. 215-103-003 (BASE)TOTAL MAY 4, 2018 City of Corcoran 2018 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 12. May 24, 2018 Resolution Accepting Firearm Safety Donations Planning Project Update Nuisance ordinance updates Natural Resource Protection Options Approval Process and Financial Guarantee for Land Use Proposals Sketch Plan for property at 19220 County Road 10 Maple Grove – Corcoran agreements o Water service o Old Brockton Letter to Roehlke property owners Proposal to study future water supply options Bee/Chickens Ordinance Subcommittee update June 14, 2018 – Brad unable to attend Clean-up day report, discuss 2019 priorities ESCI Report (Fire study) Pavement Overlay Program – Award project Municipal State Aid Feasibility Study June 28, 2018 Planning Project Update 2018 Budget – Draft 1 Commercial Kennel Amendment Small Cell Tower and DAC Telecommunications Ordinance Encore Preliminary Plat Fehn Meadows Preliminary Plat July 12, 2018 Years of Service Recognition – Brad Martens Resolution honoring Kevin Dale - CAA Financial Performance Report Recycling RFP Overview of costs of a gravel road vs. a paved road (improvement and maintenance) Appointment of Election Judges for the Primary and General Elections