Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-01-25 Council Agenda Packet *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet by Door. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the website at www.ci.corcoran.mn.us. Corcoran City Council Agenda January 25, 2018 - 7:00pm 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval 4. Open Forum 5. Presentations 6. Consent Agenda a. Draft Minutes of January 11, 2018 Council Meeting* b. Authorization for Bid/Quotes2018 Road Materials* c. Schutte Initiate Expiration of Ag Preserve* d. Cropland Rental Bids* 7. Claims as Presented a. Escrow Claims (Fund #500)* b. All Other Financial Claims* 8. Staff Reports / Memos / Commissions a. Commission Representatives* b. Planning Project Update* c. Environmental Assessment Worksheet – Encore* 9. Planning Business a. City-Initiated Sign Ordinance Update* b. Application for Site Plan Amendment and Variances for 10705 County Road 116* c. Bass Lake Estates Final PUD Plan and Final Plat* d. Preliminary Plat Extension – Sawgrass* e. Discussion of Dog Kennel Standards* f. Discussion of Animals in Commercial Districts* g. City-initiated Small Cell Tower and DAS Facility Ordinance Update* h. Comprehensive Plan Update* 10. Unfinished Business 11. New Business a. 2048-2019 Capital Improvement Plan* b. Commissioner Appointment Process* c. Temporary Assistant to the City Administrator* d. Recreation Coordinator Job Description and Hiring Process* 12. 2017/2018 Council Schedule* 13. Council Liaison Calendar Planning Commission 2/1/18 3/1/18 4/5/18 5/3/18 6/7/18 LaFave Keefe Thomas Bottema Dejewski Parks and Trails Commission 2/20/18 3/20/18 4/17/18 5/15/18 6/19/18 Bottema Available LaFave Keefe Available 14. Adjournment CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes January 11, 2018 - 7:00pm The Corcoran City Council met on January 11, 2018 at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were Mayor Thomas, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Dejewski, Councilor Keefe, and Councilor LaFave. Also present were City Administrator Martens, City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Beise, Public Works Director Mattson, and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor Thomas called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Thomas invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Martens noted that Comprehensive Plan Work Session on January 18, 2018 has been rescheduled to February 15, 2018 and asked that Council review the Comprehensive Plan Schedule. Mayor Thomas added the discussion of the Comprehensive Plan as Item 12b. MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Dejewski to approve the agenda as amended. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 4.Open Forum No persons were present to speak. 5.Presentations No presentations were heard. 6.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of December 28, 2017 Council Meeting b.Pay Equity Reporting c.Resolution 2018-02 Designating Donated Funds d.Resolution 2018-03 Accepting Donations for the City of Corcoran Canine Program Councilor LaFave asked that Item 6c. be considered separately as the program has not yet been voted upon. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted as part of the approved work plan staff was directed with implementing the canine program including accepting donations. Mayor Thomas asked that Item 6d. be considered separately MOTION: made by LaFave, seconded by Bottema to approve the consent agenda consisting of Items 6a. and 6b. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) City Clerk/Administrator Beise noted that funds from charitable gambling cannot be directly given to the police department and reallocation of those donated funds is the required process for designating donated unallocated charitable gambling funds. Council inquired about the donation. City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Beise noted the Northwest Area Jaycees were thanked for the donation at the December 28th meeting. Council inquired about donations should the canine program not move forward. City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator noted those funds would be reallocated. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Keefe to approve the consent agenda Item 6c. 6a. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) Mayor Thomas read Resolution 2018-03 Accepting Donation for the City of Corcoran Canine Program. MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Dejewski to approve the consent agenda Item 6d. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) Council thanked the Sholuk Foundation for their donations. 7. Claims as Presented a. Escrow Claims (Fund #500) MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by LaFave to approve escrow claims as presented. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) All Other Financial Claims MOTION: made by LaFave, seconded by Keefe to approve all other claims as presented. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 8. Staff Reports / Memos/Commissions a. Commissioner Representatives City Administrator Martens noted Jennifer Russell was unable to attend and Planning Commissioner Theis was in attendance instead. Mayor Thomas recognized Planning Commissioner Theis and Parks and Trails Commission Chair Anderson were in attendance and invited them to speak on items related to their commissions. b. Commercial Vehicle Inspector 2017 Summary Report Council inquired about vehicle stops. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted that commercial vehicles are subject to inspection and that all but two of the stops were based on witnessed violations. Council inquired about the inspection level. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the level of inspection is based on the coverage levels and the degree of violations. Council accepted the report. 9. Planning Business No planning business was presented. 10. Unfinished Business a. Requested Modification to Financial Guarantee Policy – Bass Lake Estates City Administrator Martens presented the report outlining the request, the difference between a letter of credit and a performance bond, and staff recommendation remains to require a letter of credit or cash. Council discussed the options. Council inquired about the financial impact of the letter of credit for the applicant. David Stradtman, Rachel Contracting, addressed the Council noting a letter of credit restricts availability of borrowing and the performance bond could mirror the language in the development contract should there be a default that is not cured and the bonding company would receive notice of default. Council inquired about the costs for a letter of credit versus a performance bond. Mr. Stradtman noted a letter of credit require the entire amount to be collateralized lowering borrowing capabilities. Mr. Stradtman noted there are initial additional costs related to a letter of credit and additional fees each time a letter is renewed. Council inquired about past projects. Mr. Stradtman noted the financial guarantee varies from City to City. Council inquired about the cost related to obtaining payment for a performance bond. City Administrator Martens noted it may be more costly depending on the situation and if a performance bond were to be issued the required cash contribution may assist in the legal costs. City Administrator Martens noted both financial guarantees are important tools and offer relatively low-risk, however it’s the opinion of the City Attorney that a performance bond has more risk. Council discussed risks of the financial guarantees. Council discussed if allowing a performance bond how much cash should be set aside and the rationale for the cash percentage. Council discussed the ordinance requirements. City Administrator Martens noted the City’s discretion in selecting a financial guarantee is in the ordinance and the City’s policy for projects with public infrastructure has been to require a letter of credit. Council discussed the policy. City Administrator Martens noted the time required to collect on a performance bond is a consideration for the City. Council discussed their opinions of the policy. Council inquired about City projects. City Administrator Martens noted that a performance bond is required for City projects and Public Works Building project contract required mediation. Council discussed the policy and the cash requirement should a performance bond be allowed. City Administrator Martens noted the recommended ten percent reflects typical attorney costs estimated in contracts and likely the City would be able to utilize the cash portion for legal fees on the bond. Council discussed the policy implementation. Greg Hayes, Ebert Construction, addressed the Council and noted that a letter of credit is required for the transportation portion and the request is for the remaining infrastructure. Council discussed the policy. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Keefe to direct staff to allow a performance bond of 115% and 10% cash for the cost of the improvements to be added to the development contract and update the language of the development contract Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, and Keefe Nay: LaFave (Motion carried 4:1) 11. New Business a. Police Canine Program Public Safety Director Gottschalk presented the report outlining the decreased access to canines and the instances of when a canine would have been needed. Public Safety Director Gottschalk outlined the estimated costs and donations to date as well as the recommended approvals. Council discussed the dog at public events. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted that the dog will need to be social and will be in the community. Council discussed the different types of dogs. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the dog selected will serve the purpose of assisting with traffic stops and search and rescue. Council discussed the cost of the program. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the donations should cover the cost of the dog program and noted the overtime and wage adjustment would need to be calculated in the budget. Council inquired about the union negotiation. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the memorandum of understanding outlines the expectations of the position and has been discussed with the union, but would need to be negotiated. Council inquired about the squad car up fit. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the up fit included all of the materials for a squad card including the radios, rifle and other standard equipment in addition to a few canine specific items. Council discussed the program and thanked Director of Public Safety Gottschalk and the team for their work. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Keefe to approve and authorize staff to execute items one through nine in the staff report. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) b. Police Detective Position Director of Public Safety Gottschalk presented the report noting the position would allow for better service for the residents. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted outlined the recommended approvals. Council inquired about the position in surrounding communities and availability to outsource the detective to other agencies. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted surrounding communities have the position and it would be unlikely to outsource those services but would work closely with other agencies. Council inquired about training. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the detective would be working with other agencies for field training and outlined the timeline for either an internal candidate or external candidate. Council inquired about receiving funds from Hennepin County for completing investigations. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted no funds were available. Council inquired about prosecution of the cases provided by the detective. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted that Hennepin County prosecutes felonies and gross misdemeanors are prosecuted by both Hennepin County and City Attorney. Council inquired about the hiring process. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted if it was filled internally staff would begin a police officer hiring to replace the officer position. Council inquired about the personnel involved in the hiring process and obtaining a vehicle from another community. Director of Public Safety noted that typically staff would bring in counterpart from an outside agency during the hiring process. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted a community can keep or forfeit property and would not be able to sell to another community. Council inquired about the timing and size of Rogers getting a detective two years ago and if the position in Corcoran was premature. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted would likely say that the position may have been warranted earlier, the City would have had the case load to fill this position in years past, and that surrounding communities and have implemented and expanded their detective programs. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Keefe to approve and authorize staff to execute items one through four in the staff report. Council discussed metrics, staffing, and drug issues. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the hiring would provide capacity in the department. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) c. Local Surface Water Management Plan – 2040 Update Public Works Director Mattson presented the report outlining the requirements for surface water noting that current practice is a compliance basis. Council inquired about erosion control. Public Works Director Mattson noted erosion control is governed under the MS4 Permit and is monitored. Council discussed community engagement. Council inquired about staff opinion. Public Works Director noted that the current level is meeting requirements and additional funds would need to be set aside if surface water is deemed a priority. City Administrator Martens noted the requirement to become a Local Government Unit in 2019, which will require additional costs for the monitoring of surface issues. Planning Commissioner Theis inquired about penalties from the watershed. Public Works Director Mattson noted the MPCA and the watershed can fine the City for non-compliance. Council discussed grants and community engagement. Public Works Director Mattson noted that with increase planning funds grant applications would likely have more information and better at competing. Council inquired about if community members have expressed interest in championing surface water. City Administrator Martens noted there has been some interest from the community and that the sub watershed assessment may be a tool for additional engagement opportunities. MOTION: made by LaFave, seconded by Keefe to maintain a compliance level directive. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) d. Annual Appointments City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Beise presented the report noting that the acting Mayor for 2017 was utilized for discussion of acting Mayor for 2018. Councilor Keefe noted he would be willing to serve in that capacity again. Council discussed the rates and increases. City Administrator Martens noted the City does compare rates with other cities and those presented seem to be in line with other communities. Council discussed costs. City Administrator Martens noted he sits down with the firms and reviews the proposed cost changes. City Administrator Martens noted that is pushing to review costs. Council discussed costs and the process. Council discussed reviewing services. City Administrator Martens noted if Council would like to have firms come in that would be possible and should the Council want to go out for bid that would likely be a 2018 project. Council discussed the rates and process. MOTION: by Keefe, seconded by LaFave to adopt Resolution 2018- Establishing Annual Appointments for the City of Corcoran for 2018 and authorize the City Administrator and Mayor to execute engagement letters as required. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) e. 2018 Legislative Priorities City Administrator Martens presented the report outlining the priorities noting an addition for an extension of 610. Council discussed adding a paragraph on utility infrastructure funding. Per consensus, Council approved the 2018 legislative priorities with the additions of the 610 extension to the Transportation section and a new section on utility infrastructure funding. f. Road Way Jurisdictional Transfers – Hennepin County City Administrator Martens presented the report outlining the City’s response to the County policy. Council discussed the County policy. City Administrator Martens noted typically City’s would request an upgrade to the road before it was transferred to the City. Council discussed the policy and current funding priorities. MOTION: by Dejewski, seconded by LaFave to direct staff to submit the letter to Hennepin County as presented. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) g. City Hall Remodel City Administrator Martens presented the report outlining the current space and the needs for the future. Council discussed the cost and being prepared to move through the remodel process. City Administrator Martens noted the study would be funded by Long Range Planning funds. Council discussed the analysis. City Administrator Martens noted after interviewing consultants the estimated costs for the analysis seem to be inline. Council discussed long term needs and underutilized space. MOTION: by Dejewski, seconded by Keefe to authorize the City Administrator to engage an architect for review of existing conditions, needs analysis, preliminary plans, and draft budget in an amount not to exceed $10,000.00. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) h. 2018 City Council Calendar City Administrator Martens presented the report noting no work sessions are currently scheduled. City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Beise noted the budget and levy will need to be approved at the first meeting in December. MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by LaFave approve the 2018 City Calendar as presented. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) 12. 2018 Council Schedule a. 2018 Council Schedule City Administrator Martens reviewed the upcoming schedule b. Comprehensive Plan Work Session and Schedule City Administrator Martens noted that staff is recommending moving the schedule one month to allow for additional time for the draft to be completed. Council discussed the process and the timeline for reviewing the draft. Per consensus, the Council directed staff to move forward with the new schedule. 13. Council Liaison Calendar The council liaison calendar was not reviewed, but was available in the Council packet. 14. Adjournment MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by LaFave to adjourn. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe, and LaFave (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:23pm. ________________________________ Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6b. Council Meeting: January 25, 2018 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Authorization to Bid/Quote 2018 Road Materials Action Required: Approval Summary: Annually the City contracts for various road materials. Staff requests authorization to obtain quotes and bids for asphalt maintenance, dust control, sealcoating and gravel hauling services. Financial/Budget: Costs to purchase the above services are included in the 2018 budget. Staff will adjust the ultimate project scope depending on the cost of the quotes and bids received. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost-effective, and friendly manner. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Recommendation: Authorize staff to obtain quotes and bids for asphalt maintenance, dust control, sealcoating, and gravel hauling services. Council Action: Authorize staff to obtain quotes and bids for asphalt maintenance, dust control, sealcoating, and gravel hauling services. Attachments: N/A 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net LandformSM, SensiblyGreenSM and Site to FinishSM are service marks of Landform Engineering Company. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: January 17, 2018 for the January 25, 2018 City Council Meeting RE: Request for Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve Initiation of Expiration for 240 acres of land owned by The Schutte Family Limited Partnership (PID 13-119-23-42-0001 and 13-119-23-31-0001) (city file no. 17-041) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: February 13, 2018 1.Application Request The landowner is requesting City approval to initiate expiration of this land into the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program. 2.Background The Schutte Family Limited Partnership includes approximately 240 acres on two separate parcels. These properties are designated as Agricultural Preserve on the 2030 Future Land Use Map and zoned Rural Residential. Both parcels are outside of the 2030 Sanitary Sewer Service Staging Plan of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 3.Analysis The properties are currently enrolled in the Agricultural Preserve program. The landowner is providing notice of withdrawal, as required by Minnesota State Statutes §473.08, Subd. 2. The Statute requires the applicant provide a notice of expiration and a date of expiration. Expiration will be 8 years from the date of Council action. The MUSA line is proposed to be revised to include these properties as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. 4.Recommendation Move to recommend approval of the following: a.Resolution approving Notice of Expiration Agenda Item 6c. 2 Schutte Ag Preserve Expiration (city file 17-041)January 25, 2018 Attachments 1.Resolution Approving Ag Preserve Notice of Expiration 2.Aerial Location Map 3.2030 Land Use Map 4.Sewer Staging Plan Map 5.Agricultural Preserve Application City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - 04 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR METROPOLITAN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE INITIATION OF EXPIRATION FOR 240 ACRES OF LAND OWNED BY THE SCHUTTE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (PID 13-119-23-42-0001 and 13-119-23-31- 0001) (CITY FILE 17-041) WHEREAS, Craig Schutte on behalf of The Schutte Family Limited Partnership is requesting approval of initiation of expiration for 240 acres of land in two parcels for property legally described as follows: 157.06 Acres beginning at a point in East line of SE1/4 distant 290 ft. So from NE corner thereof then West at right angles 255 ft. then North at right angles to the North line thereof then West to the NW corner thereof then South to the SW corner thereof then East to the SE Corner thereof then North to beginning. Except road. Sec 13, T.119, R.23 PID 13-119- 23-42-0001 And 80 Acres in the East ½ of the SW ¼ of Sec. 13, T.119, R.23 PID13-119-23-42-31-001 WHEREAS, the below described parcels are located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); WHEREAS, the owners have submitted notice of withdrawal, which would remove the property from Agricultural Preserve in 8 years; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the notice of withdrawal. City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - 04 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of January 2018. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator He nn e pin Cou n ty P roperty Ma p Da te : 1/8 /2 01 8 Com men ts: 1 inc h = 8 00 fee t PAR C EL ID: 13 119 23 42 000 1 OWN ER N AME : Th e Sch utte Family L P PAR C EL AD DR E SS: 1 930 1 Sch ut te Rd , C or co ran MN 55 34 0 PAR C EL AR EA: 15 9.2 a cr es , 6 ,9 34 ,9 04 s q ft A-T-B: Ab stra ct SAL E PR ICE: SAL E D ATA: SAL E C OD E: ASSESS ED 2 016 , PAYABLE 201 7 PR OPERT Y TYPE: R es iden t ial H OM ESTEAD : N on -H ome ste ad M AR KET VA L UE: $92 5,10 0 TAX TO TAL: $8 ,9 03 .5 0 ASSESS ED 2 017 , PAYABLE 201 8 PRO PER TY TYPE : R eside ntial HO MESTEAD: No n-h ome s te ad MARKE T VALU E: $9 15 ,6 00 This dat a (i) is fur nished 'A S IS' wi th no repres ent at ion as to com ple ten es s or acc ura cy; (ii) is furnis he d w ith no war rant y of an y k ind; an d (i ii) is not su itab le for lega l, engi neering or s urv ey ing purpo ses. Hen nepin C ounty s hall not be liable f or a ny dam age, in jury o r los s r esu lting f rom this dat a. CO PYRIG HT © HEN N EPIN CO UN TY 2 0 18 ROADSCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD OLD SETTLERS RD HORSESHOE TRAIL STIEG RD WILLOW D RIVE TR AIL HAVEN ROAD CAI N ROAD O A K D A L E D R STREHLER ROAD PIONEER TR COUNTY ROAD 117 ROLLLING HILLS RD LARKIN RD TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CITY OF GREENFIELD CITY OF MAPLE GROVE SCOTT LAKE BECHTOLD ROAD $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORINLAKE GOOSELAKE COOKLAKE RUSH CREEK 6/21/22 10/2020 4/22/2020 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 6/21/22 7/24/2018 5/26/2020 1/21/2016 7/24/2018 4/28/2021 1/22/2023 8/9/2018 5/26/2020 10/201812/13/22 1/22/2023 1/22/2023 4/22/2020 2030 FutureLand Use Plan 4 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet 2030 Comprehensive Plan Figure 8 City Limit Staging Boundaries Wetlands CORCORAN_Parcels_Sep2017 Rural/Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public Parks/Open Space Golf Course Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open Water *The Future Land Use plan depicts the location and intensity of future development through a variety of land use types. This plan is intended to guide future development however the City has discretion to amend (with Metropolitan Council approval) the plan in response to landowner/ developer requests or response to other system plans. Updated September 2016Adopted June 2011 19 10 50 19 10 30 101 116 City ofCORCORAN ROADSCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD OLD SETTLERS RD HORSESHOE TRAIL STIEG RD WILLOW D RIVE HACKAMORE ROAD TR AIL HAVEN ROAD CAI N ROAD O A K D A L E D R STREHLER ROAD PIONEER TR COUNTY ROAD 117 ROLLLING HILLS RD LARKIN RD (62ND AVE N) TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CITY OF GREENFIELD CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF MEDINA SCOTT LAKE BECHTOLD ROAD $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORINLAKE GOOSELAKE COOKLAKE RUSH CREEK 2030 Sanitary SewerService Staging Plan 4 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet 2030 Comprehensive Plan Figure 9 City Limit 2030musa Wetlands Sanitary Sewer Service Staging 2010 - 2015 2015 - 2020 2020 - 2025 2025 - 2030 *The staging plan represents a progression of sewer that is based on location of planned Metropolitan Interceptors and where the first sewered growth is anticipated to occur, however the City does not commit to it occurring. Updated October 2013Adopted June 2011 City ofCORCORAN 19 50 19 10 30 10 116 101 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6d. Council Meeting: January 25, 2018 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Cropland Rental Bids Action Required: Approval Summary: The City owns property near City Hall and has regularly rented the land. The City requests bids for the rental of 48 tillable acres of land for farming purposes and leases the property to the highest bidder. In 2016 the City bid for a two year contract and staff recommends a similar lease term for 2018 and 2019. With authorization of the Council, bids would be accepted through February 12th with a formal bid opening and the lease agreement would be executed at the February 22nd meeting. Payments for the rental of the land would be due April 1st of each year. Financial/Budget: The 2018 budget reflects a similar revenue to past years. The land rented for $210.00 per acre in 2016 and 2017. The rental program does provide a revenue stream, noting that approximately 30% of the rental revenue is spent on taxes for renting non-taxed land. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost-effective, and friendly manner. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Council Action: Authorize staff to obtain bids for cropland rentals for 2018-2019. Attachments: N/A Agenda Item 7a-b. CouncilMeeting Date: 1/25/2018 FINANCIALCLAIMS Prepared By: jrotz CHECKRANGE FUND #500ESCROW CLAIMSAgendaItem: 7a. Paid toAmountProject name 500-20414$ GeorgeGmach - Gmach sketchplan 17-004escrowrefund 500-20425$ GeorgeGmach - Gmachprelim/finalplat17-017escrowrefund 500-20396$ 500.Landform - Ravinia4th16-004 500-20400$ 460.Landform - Ravinia6th16-016 500-20376$ 31.25 Landform - Park Place Storage17-034 500-20416$ 375.Landform - SunriseSolar17-007 500-20430$ 31.25 Landform - BassLake CrossingFP, FPUD, andDA17-022 500-20436$ 187.Landform - PulteSketchPlan 17-029 500-20443$ Landform - PheasantAcresSPA17-035 500-20442$ Landform - BassLakeEst. FP, PUD17-036 500-20444$ 125.Landform - SACWireless-Sprint 17-040 500-20445$ 62.50 Landform - Ravinia 9thFPandPUD17-042 500-20390$ 725.WrightHennepin - Ravinia StreetLights Total$ TotalFund #500 = SeeattachedPaymentsDetail) AgendaItem:7b.ALLOTHERFINANCIAL CLAIMS$ 180,455.01$ 188,583.25 TotalChecks SeeattachedCheckDetailRegister) TotalofAutoDeductions 136,236.65 TOTALEXPENDITURES FORAPPROVAL$ 324,819.90 AutoDeductions / ElectronicFundTransfer / OtherDisbursements DatePaid toAmount 1/11/2018Pagliais Pizza - Mankato, MN$ 69.43 1/11/2018Ummies - Mankato, MN$ 126. 1/12/2018Number4AmericanBar - Mankato, MN$ 154. 1/12/2018Mankato CityCenterHotel - Mankato, MN$ 184. 1/12/2018Mankato CityCenterHotel - Mankato, MN$ 184. 1/12/2018Mankato CityCenterHotel - Mankato, MN$ 184. 1/12/2018Mankato CityCenterHotel - Mankato, MN$ 184. 1/19/2018Walgreens - Rogers, MN$ 587. 1/5/2018Revtrak SV9T$ 108. 1/5/2018PaychexCGS, Garnish$ 531. 1/5/2018Net PayrollPP01$ 16,158.47 1/5/2018Payroll Taxes$ 39,599.08 1/8/2018PaychexFee$ 679. 1/9/2018PERA$ 12,146.17 1/10/2018State ofMN - MSRS$ 1/10/2018State ofMN - Roth$ 1/10/2018Optum - HSA$ 1/19/2018POSTALIA, TDCPOSTAGE$ 350. 1/19/2018Paychex CGS, Garnish$ 531. 1/19/2018NetPayroll PP02$ 42,217.60 1/19/2018PayrollTaxes$ 15,351.68 Total$ H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\CouncilClaims\\2018ClaimsWorkbook CITY OF CORCORAN 01/24/18 11:18 AM Page 1 *Check Detail Register@ January 2018 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 Farmers State Bank Unpaid ACCURATE RADAR SPECIALTIES E 100 - 42100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $397.59 2779 SQUAD MAINTENANCE - ANNUAL RADAR CALIBRATION & LIDAR Total ACCURATE RADAR SPECIALTIES $397.59 Unpaid AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES E 100 - 41951 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $292.13 11CT- KCDT -M SUPPLIES E 100 - 41951 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $389.64 1 DPW -PWHX- LENOVO 1 TB EXTERNAL HARD DRIVE E 100 - 42100 -223 Building Repair Supplies $32.79 1 DPW -PWHX- SUPPLIES E 100 - 42100 -223 Building Repair Supplies $29.21 1 F6Q- 4K16 -1-11 OSHA SAFETY SIGN E 100 - 42100 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $7.52 1 NKH- WTVX -J OFFICE SUPPLIES E 100 - 42100 -417 Uniforms $164.45 1 P1 G- Q3FM -C UNIFORMS E 100 - 42100 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $9.99 1 P9P- 3WV4 -J OFFICE SUPPLIES E 100 -42100 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $134.57 1 P9P- 3WV4 -N OFFICE SUPPLIES Total AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES $1,060.30 Unpaid BANYON DATA SYSTEMS E 601- 49400 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $497.50 00156892 UB DIRECT PAYMENT MODULE E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $497.50 00156892 UB DIRECT PAYMENT MODULE Total BANYON DATA SYSTEMS $995.00 Unpaid BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS E 100 - 45200 -221 Maintenance Projects $3,470.03 26764 RED BALL D Total BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS $37470.03 Unpaid CASH E 100 - 42100 -212 Motor Fuels $9.00 01052018 POLICE LICENSE PLATE E 100 - 42100 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $6.00 11142017 MONEY ORDER FOR BAIL E 100 - 42100 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $10.75 12182017 STATIONERY Total CASH $25.75 Unpaid CDW GOVERNMENT E 100 - 41951 -207 Computer Supplies $1,377.22 LGR0885 COMPUTER SUPPLIES E 100 -41951 -207 Computer Supplies $1,508.29 LJX1851 COMPUTER SUPPLIES E 100 - 41951 -207 Computer Supplies $138.86 LKF8289 COMPUTER SUPPLIES Total CDW GOVERNMENT $3,024.37 Unpaid CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON E 100 - 43100 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $947.91 01 -08 -18 NATURAL GAS -9100 E 100 - 45200 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $162.78 8000014143 -4 NATURAL GAS - 5754177 E 100 - 41941 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $39.15 8000014143 -4 NATURAL GAS - 5754460 Total CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON $17149.84 � -_ -..' 4 _ Unpaid -_.-� _. __. -_ .' -_'_ , -._ -. r..__- ._TU_. -_. CENRY LINK 91154 E 100 - 43100 -321 Telephone $136.29 123117 LAND LINE /FIRE MONITORING -9100 763- 498 -7515 Total CENTURY LINK 91154 $136.29 Unpaid J CINTAS - 470 CITY OF CORCORAN 01/24/18 11:18 AM Page 2 *Check Detail Register@ January 2018 Check Amt Invoice Comment - -- - - ------- y- - - - - -- --- E 100 - 43100 -210 - - - - -- -__- - -- _ _----- .------- --- - - Operating Supplies (GENERAL) ---- - - - $0.00 - -- - - - -- - -- -------- - - - - -- - - - -.. - -- ___..__... - -- - - ----- - - - - -- - -- - -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -, PUBLIC WORKS TOWELS E 100 - 43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $0.00 PUBLIC WORKS TOWELS E 100 - 41941 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $63.85 470287291 CITY HALL RUGS E 100 - 42100 -223 Building Repair Supplies $55.16 470287292 PD RUGS E 100 - 43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $69.93 470287293 PW RUGS E 100 - 41941 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $61.17 470287294 CITY HALL RUGS E 100 - 43100 -417 Uniforms $139.40 470287295 PW UNIFORMS E 100 - 41941 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $63.85 470290678 CITY HALL RUGS E 100 - 42100 -223 Building Repair Supplies $43.50 470290679 PD RUGS E 100 - 43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $28.61 470290680 PW RUGS E 100- 41941 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $61.17 470290681 CITY HALL RUGS E 100 - 43100 -417 Uniforms $139.40 470290682 PW UNIFORMS Total CINTAS - 470 $726.04 Unpaid COMCAST- 902943336 E 100 - 41941 -321 Telephone $107.78 59614458 LAND LINE E 100 - 42100 -321 Telephone $107.78 59614458 LAND LINE E 100 - 43100 -321 Telephone $107.79 59614458 LAND LINE Total COMCAST- 902943336 $323.35 Unpaid COMCAST- INTERNET E 100 - 42100 -321 Telephone $72.43 011118 PD INTERNET E 100 - 41941 -321 Telephone $72.42 011118 CITY HALL INTERNET Total COMCAST- INTERNET $144.85 Unpaid CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER E 100- 41941 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $65.75 114X64397207 OFFICE WATER Total CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER $65.75 - - -- Unpaid - DELTA DENTAL E 100 - 41400 -131 Employer Paid Health $132.05 7166746 DENTAL INSURANCE E 100 - 42100 -131 Employer Paid Health $162.75 7166746 DENTAL INSURANCE E 100 - 42102 -131 Employer Paid Health $0.00 7166746 DENTAL INSURANCE E 100 -43100 -131 Employer Paid Health $124.40 7166746 DENTAL INSURANCE G 100 -20205 Reimbursements $63.00 7166746 DENTAL INSURANCE - HAMILTON Total DELTA DENTAL $482.20 Unpaid ELM CREEK WATERSHED MGMT COMM E 100 -41900 -433 Dues and Memberships $14,663.98 225 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT al ELM CREEK WATERSHED MGMT COMM $141663.98 Unpaid - - EVOLVING SOLUTIONS INC E 100 - 41951 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $1,350.00 98970 IT MANAGED SERVICE - MONTHLY E 100 - 41951 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $1,350.00 99266 IT MANAGED SERVICE - MONTHLY Total EVOLVING SOLUTIONS INC $21700.00 Unpaid FERGUSON WATERWORKS E 601- 49400 -215 Water Meters $542.82 0271770 METERS CITY OF CORCORAN 01/24/18 11:18 AM Page 3 *Check Detail Register@ January 2018 Check Amt Invoice Comment - Total FERGUSON WATERWORKS $542.82 Unpaid GMACH, GEORGE G 500 -20414 Gmach Sketch Plan 17 -004 $1,245.50 010918 ESCROW REFUND G 500 -20425 Gmach Prelim /Final Plat 17 -017 $17459.10 010918 ESCROW REFUND Total GMACH, GEORGE $27704.60 Unpaid GOPHER STATE ONE CALL E 601- 49400 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $25.00 8000295 SERVICE E 602- 49450 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $25.00 8000295 SERVICE Total GOPHER STATE ONE CALL $50.00 Unpaid HEALTH PARTNERS E 100 - 41300 -131 Employer Paid Health $388.00 78273130 HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18 INVOICE E 100 - 41400 -131 Employer Paid Health $37485.89 78273130 HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18 INVOICE E 100 - 42100 -131 Employer Paid Health $6,083.84 78273130 HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18 INVOICE E 100 - 42102 -131 Employer Paid Health $605.90 78273130 HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18 INVOICE E 100 -43100 -131 Employer Paid Health $5,699.97 78273130 HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18 INVOICE G 100 -20205 Reimbursements $1,481.50 78273130 HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18 INVOICE - HAMILTON G 100 -20205 Reimbursements $1,849.50 78273130 HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18 INVOICE - SCHUTTE E 100 - 43100 -131 Employer Paid Health $388.00 78445342 HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18 INVOICE E 100 - 41400 -131 Employer Paid Health $3,485.89 78445342 HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18 INVOICE E 100 - 42100 -131 Employer Paid Health $6,083.84 78445342 HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18 INVOICE E 100 - 42102 -131 Employer Paid Health $605.90 78445342 HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18 INVOICE E 100 - 43100 -131 Employer Paid Health $5,699.97 78445342 HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18 INVOICE G 100 -20205 Reimbursements $1,481.50 78445342 HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18 INVOICE G 100 -20205 Reimbursements $1,849.50 78445342 HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18 INVOICE Total HEALTH PARTNERS $39,189.20 Unpaid HEINZ, BRANDON G 100 -21713 H R A Payable $392.79 011618 HRA REIMBURSEMENT - EYE CARE Total HEINZ, BRANDON $392.79 Unpaid HENN CO SHERIFF -MC129 E 100 - 42100 -301 Prisoner $210.00 1000103381 PRISONER FEES - BOOKING /HOUSING Total HENN CO SHERIFF -MC129 $210.00 Unpaid HENN CO TAXPAYER SERVICES E 100 - 41900 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $180.70 13- 119- 23 -23- PROPERTY TAX Total HENN CO TAXPAYER SERVICES $180.70 Unpaid HENN CTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPT E 100 - 41941 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $265.00 2018 ANNUAL LICENSE Total HENN CTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPT $265.00 Unpaid 1 -94 WEST CHAMBER E 100 - 41900 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $25.00 5859 STATE OF THE CITIES 2018 MARTENS E 100- 41900 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $25.00 5860 STATE OF THE CITIES 2018 THOMAS CITY OF CORCORAN 01/24/1811:18 AM Page 4 *Check Detail Register0 January 2018 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total 1-94 WEST CHAMBER $50.00 Unpaid ICEMAN INDUSTRIES INC E 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $661.50 018561 49 BAGS LAVA MELT Total ICEMAN INDUSTRIES INC $661.50 Unpaid JOTS COMPUTER SERVICES ­- E 100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $412.50 25413 CONTRACT SERVICE Total JOTS COMPUTER SERVICES $412.50 Unpaid KOTHRADE SEWER WATER EXCAVATIN E 100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $265.00 21919K SEPTIC PUMPING al KOTHRADE SEWER WATER EXCAVATIN $265.00 z -_ ::7 _-Z 7 _z- z �_z .7-7 Unpaid LAW&O-RM G 500-20396 Ravinia 4th Addition $500.00 26828 RAVINIA 4TH 16-004 G 500-20400 Ravinia 5th & 6th $460.00 26828 RAVINIA 6TH 16-016 E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $40.67 26828 REIMBURSABLE E 100-41911-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $4,653.50 26840 CORCORAN 2040 COMPREHENSIVE 17-001 G 500-20376 Park Place Storage $31.25 26840 PARK PLACE STORAGE 17-034 G 500-20416 Sunrise Solar - 17-007 $375.00 26840 SUNRISE SOLAR - 17-007 G 500-20430 Bass Lk Cross FP, FPUD, 17-022 $31.25 26840 BASS LAKE CROSSING FP, FPUD, AND DA 17-022 E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $21093.75 26840 CITY MEETINGS E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $60.99 26840 REIMBURSABLE E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $31.25 26840 SCHUTTE INITIATE AG PRESERVE EXPIRATION 17- 041 E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $230.00 26840 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT DOG KENNELS 17-037 E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $31.25 26840 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SMALL CELLS & DAS 17- 039 E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $371.50 26840 SIGN ORDINANCE - DYNAMIC SIGN 17-033 G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 $187.50 26840 PULTE SKETCH PLAN 17-029 G 500-20443 Pheasant Acres SPA 17-035 $17050.25 26840 PHEASANT ACRES SPA 17-035 G 500-20442 Bass Lake Est. FP, PUD 17-036 $11875.00 26840 BASS LAKE EST. FP, PUD 17-036 G 500-20444 SAC Wireless-Sprint 17-040 $125.00 26840 SAC WIRELESS-SPRINT 17-040 G 500-20445 Ravinia 9th FP and PUD 17-042 $62.50 26840 RAVINIA 9TH FP AND PUD 17-042 Total LANDFORM $12,210.66 Unpaid LANO EQUIPMENT E 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $281.13 02-530190 SUPPLIES Total LANO EQUIPMENT $281.13 F_ mf .1 -7- ___ __ - - . =- __. _ - . - - - - _ = - -- . Z- - __- _--- ­ - =_ . - ==-= ­ __ - Unpaid LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES _ - - �_ ­_ �_ __- -Z­_ = = =--- _ =­­, ­_-, - ­ _ = -­ __ - - �� , _ = _-_ ­ --= _­ . - ­ - I ­ - _ - - __ - - ­ ­__ . E 100-41300-208 Training and Instruction $99.00 266986 2018 LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE FOR CITIES E 100-41300-208 Training and Instruction $20.00 267825 4-19-18 MEETING Total LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES $119.00 p­ i d LORETTO FIRE DEPARTMENT E 100-42200-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $38,498.55 2-2218 2018 FIRE PROTECTION - 1ST QTR CITY OF CORCORAN 01/24/18 11:18 AM Page 5 *Check Detail Register@ January 2018 Unpaid METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO E 602- 49450 -312 MCES Sewage Treatment $17130.05 0001076793 MATERIAL TREATMENT Total METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO $1,130.05 Check Amt Invoice Comment � ME Total LORETTO FIRE DEPARTMENT $38,498.55 E 100- 43100 -220 [ :.: F, 131Y:• i. i. i:: r. Y+': a% 1. Mi7aARt`i(F1dS�.Lpr:u3�:=.T:M Unpaid ._-_._ �`�:= T�i:..��_,-.�+^..L;'-: .. .. rs. ^�^, -; . _.._ _... ... ... --rte MAPLE GROVE, CITY OF _ ... _ __ ,. _.v- �u;^.:.scr.- e�--cc _^cater- +sm:-c-,z. __ _ ....,.. _ .__-- rr- _- mac.- ; -..... E 601 -49400 -311 Water Purchased $5,436.64 18076 WATER USAGE E 601- 49400 -310 Other Professional Services $11,779.00 18078 ANNUAL CDD CONNECTION CHARGES Total Total MAPLE GROVE, CITY OF $171215.64 Unpaid Unpaid MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES E 100 - 42100 -200 E 100- 43100 -232 Gravel $4,203.09 22101705 CLASS 2 Total MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES $4,203.09 Unpaid MPCA : :_• _... .- .:_ ✓:-1 . .. .;`:...:_.... Unpaid „'_, L1�tk:'l bl lw' 4` �' n.` i: xat�'. r- .:L.._u,.1t.L1.,_y7...: -l:u.: w:•. . t_ ,_”- t. v�'F.ni..- i..7.Y__�z.4..`r.: MCDONOUGH, MARK ..M,a+t.: =,; .,rl�.i�dr3;,t.,. ..,.. �.,=_,. u. ��_,ni'r:mfioc�r�^St�+.ecr=:__ ,..._ _ � ___� __ _ _... � _ ._ .... ,.. c: rv... r.-, c- ... +ve,c,=*rm,<.vs,sx:wn.., E 202 - 42100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $12,900.00 K9 CONTRAC K9 CONTRACT Total MCDONOUGH, MARK $127900.00 Unpaid MENARDS MAPLE GROVE E 100- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $18.35 14451 REPAIR SUPPLIES E 100 - 43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $16.97 14571 SUPPLIES E 100 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $5.98 14588 SUPPLIES Total MENARDS MAPLE GROVE $41.30 -_ ^n^sarc._- -_-i. - -mda�. b... . ,_ Unpaid _. ._... .. .._ - -.._. _ ..... _.. _ _. . ..._. ._'+i�• -.. c"- .. - =.._. _. -� METRO SALES INC _-- -, _ __.. _ __- _ -. -.. _ - - -; -�sar: .= cr: ac -a::+.= c_rraa-zc.= acarorcc. -.� ...sc.cc ,..caax�ca rsar..s... x_- .ors,i- .-u..zvr u.�..- a.-rra: ur- ..- �-s....- �_yc�� E 100 - 41130 -351 Newsletter Expenses $614.95 INV982633 NEWSLETTER SUPPLIES E 100 - 41951 -207 Computer Supplies $17104.75 INV982633 NEWSLETTER SUPPLIES Total METRO SALES INC $1,719.70 Unpaid METROPOLITAN AREA MGRS ASSOC E 100 - 41300 -208 Training and Instruction $20.00 2764 MEETING Total METROPOLITAN AREA MGRS ASSOC $20.00 Unpaid METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO E 602- 49450 -312 MCES Sewage Treatment $17130.05 0001076793 MATERIAL TREATMENT Total METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO $1,130.05 Unpaid MILLER CHEVROLET E 100- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $399.06 CVW150464 REPAIR PARTS Total MILLER CHEVROLET $399.06 Unpaid MN CRIME PREVENTION ASSOC E 100 - 42100 -433 Dues and Memberships $45.00 EKENBERG MEMBERSHIP DUES - EKENBERG Total MN CRIME PREVENTION ASSOC $45.00 Unpaid MODERN MARKETING E 100 - 42100 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $295.00 MM1125709 SUPPLIES Total MODERN MARKETING $295.00 Unpaid MPCA E 100 - 43170 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $400.00 MS4 STORM 2018 MS4 STORMWATER PERMIT RENEWAL Total MPCA $400.00 CITY OF CORCORAN 01/24/1811:18 AM Page 6 *Check Detail Register0 January 2018 Check Amt Invoice Comment Unpaid NAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORAN E 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $10.78 158868 SUPPLIES Total NAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORAN $10.78 Unpaid NORTH MEMORIAL EMS EDUCATION E 100-42100-208 Training and Instruction $180.00 P-DGWKD-22 TRAINING Total NORTH MEMORIAL EMS EDUCATION $180.00 Unpaid NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC E 100-41900-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $2,525.00 5131 FINANCIAL REPORTING Total NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC $2,525.00 Unpaid RESOURCE TRAINING & SOLUTIONS E 100-41400-131 Employer Paid Health $664.50 180102097165 BCBS DECEMBER 2017 INVOICE Total RESOURCE TRAINING & SOLUTIONS $664.50 M-0 Unpaid ROGERS, CITY OF E 100-42200-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $27,957.85 010918 FIRE PROTECTION - 1ST QUARTER Total ROGERS, CITY OF $27,957.85 Unpaid STEELMAN, PAULA E 100-42100-417 Uniforms Total STEELMAN, PAULA Unpaid SUN LIFE FINANCIAL E 100-41300-131 Employer Paid Health E 100-41400-131 Employer Paid Health E 100-41920-131 Employer Paid Health E 100-42100-131 Employer Paid Health E 100-43100-131 Employer Paid Health E 100-42102-131 Employer Paid Health G 100-20205 Reimbursements G 100-21716 Short Term Disability G 100-21717 Long Term Disability Total SUN LIFE FINANCIAL Unpaid TEGRETE E 100-41941-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (GENERAL Total TEGRETE Unpaid TERMINAL SUPPLY CO $250.00 011718 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $250.00 $25.90 237687-2018-0 EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH $28.40 237687-2018-0 EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH $25.90 237687-2018-0 EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH $374.80 237687-2018-0 EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH $75.60 237687-2018-0 EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH $55.15 237687-2018-0 EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH $2.50 237687-2018-0 COBRA $626.57 237687-2018-0 EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH $349.87 237687-2018-0 EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH $17564.69 $365.00 72581 MONTHLY CITY HALL CLEANING $365.00 E 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $484.10 77742-01 SUPPLIES Total TERMINAL SUPPLY CO $484.10 POT-1- z Unpaid US BANKCORP EQUIPMENT FINANCE E 100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) . otal US BANKCORP EQUIPMENT FINANCE Unpaid VERIZON WIRELESS $348.70 347772006 COPIER LEASE $348.70 CITY OF CORCORAN 01/24/18 11:18 AM Page 7 *Check Detail Register0 January 2018 Check A E 100-42100-323 Radio Units $245.07 E 100-42100-321 Telephone $342.67 Total VERIZON WIRELESS $587.74 Unpaid WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE Mt Invoice 9798821240 9798821240 Comment RADIO UNITS CELL SERVICE E 100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $25.00 804997 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Total WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $25.00 Unpaid WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECT E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights $40.36 011618 CTY RD 10/116 000-0100-1469 E 100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $171.34 011618 Ballpark: 120-1246-7200 E 100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $21.41 011618 CIVIL DEFENSE: 120-1246-8000 E 100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $21.77 011618 Maple Hill Est: 120-1246-8100 E 100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $42.53 011618 School Property: 120-1247-9600 E 100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $1,716.11 011618 8200 Cty Rd 116: 120-1255-6300 E 100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $0.00 011618 6510 Cty Rd 116: 150-1680-4662 E 601-49400-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $22.83 011618 19090 Bass Lk Rd: 150-1687-7510 E 100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $57.24 011618 9525 Cain Rd: 150-1689-5230 E 602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $364.07 011618 Brockton Ln: 150-1689-6871 E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights $19.29 011618 Cty 10/Maple Hi: 120-1246-7300 E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights $40.32 011618 CTY 10/Treptaus: 120-1246-7400 E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights $40.32 011618 CTY 10/St Thomas: 120-1246-7500 E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights $40.32 011618 Cty 10/Stanchion:120-1246-7600 E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights $40.32 011618 Co Rd 10 & 50: 120-1246-7700 E 100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $20.41 011618 8200 Cty Rd 116: 120-1246-7800 E 100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $24.21 011618 75th Ave/Hwy 116:120-1246-7900 E 100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $188.70 011618 8200 Cty Rd 116: 150-1684-2033 E 100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $55.90 011618 9100 Cty Rd 19: 150-1688-8463 E 422-49450-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $174.23 011618 20120 CTY 10 LI F: 150-1691-6661 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 Bridle/Gleason: 150-1690-5131 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 Bridle/Paddock: 150-1690-5135 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 Paddock Ln 150-1690-5137 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 Bridle Path: 150-1690-5146 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 Paddock/Bridle: 150-1690-5158 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 6471 Carriage: 150-1691-0155 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 Bridle/Steeple: 150-1691-0158 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 Bridle/Bluestem: 150-1691-0168 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 Prairie/Bridle: 150-1691-0174 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 Bridle Path: 150-1691-0177 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $30.01 011618 Elderberry Ct: 150-1691-0178 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $32.22 011618 66TH/CEDAR: 150-1692-8373 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $32.22 011618 Bridle/66th Ave: 150-1692-8374 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $0.00 011618 6629 CTY 101: 150-1691-8062 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $28.89 011618 19301 Annabelle: 150-1691-8063 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $28.89 011618 6675 Carriage: 150-1691-8064 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $28.89 011618 6681 Bridle: 150-1691-8066 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $28.89 011618 6657 Bridle: 150-1691-8079 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $28.89 011618 19130 Galloway: 150-1691-8080 CITY OF CORCORAN *Check Detail Register0 January 2018 Check Amt Invoice Comment 01/24/18 11:18 AM Page 8 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $28.89 011618 19065 Galloway: 150-1691-8082 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $32.70 011618 6485 Larkspur: 150-1692-0907 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $43.35 011618 6398 Larkspur: 150-1692-0908 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $16.39 011618 19437 LUPINE LN: 150-1693-0197 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $16.39 011618 19389 LUPINE LN: 150-1693-0199 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $16.39 011618 19345 GOLDENROD TRL: 150-1693-0200 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $16.39 011618 6310 STEEPLE CHASE LN: 150-1693-0201 G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights $16.39 011618 6370 STEEPLE CHASE LN: 150-1693-0202 Total WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECT $3,827.57 Unpaid XCEL ENERGY E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights $34.86 575118045 STREET LIGHTING 9525 CAIN ROAD E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights $27.78 575613920 STREET LIGHTING CR19/CR30 Total XCEL ENERGY $62.64 Unpaid ZEP SALES & SERVICE E 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $268.01 9003205387 SUPPLIES Total ZEP SALES & SERVICE $268.01 10100 Farmers State Bank $202,889.21 Fund Summary 10100 Farmers State Bank 100 GENERAL FUND $161,366.33 202 POLICE DONATION FUND $127900.00 422 DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT $174.23 500 ESCROW HOLDING FUND $87128.24 601 WATER $18,303.79 602 SEWER $2,016.62 $202,889.21 01/19/1810:54AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 1 Check Detail Register© January 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment 10100 FarmersState Bank Unpaid ACCURATERADARSPECIALTIES E100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$397.592779SQUADMAINTENANCE - ANNUAL RADAR CALIBRATION & LIDAR Total ACCURATE RADARSPECIALTIES 397.59 Unpaid AMAZONCAPITALSERVICES E100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$292.1311CT-KCDT-MSUPPLIES E100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$389.641DPW-PWHX-LENOVO1TBEXTERNAL HARDDRIVE E100-42100-223 Building RepairSupplies$32.791DPW-PWHX-SUPPLIES E100-42100-223 BuildingRepairSupplies$29.211F6Q-4K16-H1OSHASAFETYSIGN E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$7.521NKH-WTVX-JOFFICESUPPLIES E100-42100-417 Uniforms$164.451P1G-Q3FM-CUNIFORMS E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$9.991P9P-3WV4-JOFFICE SUPPLIES E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$134.571P9P-3WV4-NOFFICESUPPLIES Total AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1,060.30 Unpaid BANYONDATA SYSTEMS E601-49400-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$497.5000156892UBDIRECT PAYMENT MODULE E602-49450-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$497.5000156892UBDIRECT PAYMENT MODULE Total BANYON DATA SYSTEMS 995.00 Unpaid BRYANROCKPRODUCTS E100-45200-221 Maintenance Projects$3,470.0326764RED BALL D Total BRYAN ROCKPRODUCTS 3,470.03 Unpaid CASH E100-42100-212 Motor Fuels$9.0001052018POLICE LICENSE PLATE E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$6.0011142017MONEY ORDER FORBAIL E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$10.7512182017STATIONERY Total CASH 25.75 Unpaid CDWGOVERNMENT E100-41951-207 ComputerSupplies$1,377.22LGR0885COMPUTER SUPPLIES E100-41951-207 ComputerSupplies$1,508.29LJX1851COMPUTER SUPPLIES Total CDWGOVERNMENT 2,885.51 Unpaid CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$947.9101-08-18NATURAL GAS-9100 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$162.788000014143-4 NATURALGAS - 5754177 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$39.158000014143-4 NATURALGAS - 5754460 Total CENTERPOINTENERGYHOUSTON 1,149.84 Unpaid CENTURYLINK 91154 E100-43100-321 Telephone$136.29123117LAND LINE/FIREMONITORING-9100763-498-7515 Total CENTURYLINK91154 136.29 Unpaid CINTAS - 470 E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$0.00PUBLIC WORKS TOWELS 01/19/1810:54AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 2 Check Detail Register© January 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$0.00PUBLIC WORKS TOWELS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$63.85470287291CITY HALLRUGS E100-42100-223 Building RepairSupplies$55.16470287292PDRUGS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$69.93470287293PW RUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$61.17470287294CITYHALLRUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$139.40470287295PW UNIFORMS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$63.85470290678CITYHALLRUGS E100-42100-223 Building RepairSupplies$43.50470290679PDRUGS E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$28.61470290680PW RUGS E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$61.17470290681CITY HALLRUGS E100-43100-417 Uniforms$139.40470290682PW UNIFORMS Total CINTAS - 470 726.04 Unpaid COMCAST-INTERNET E100-42100-321 Telephone$72.43011118PD INTERNET E100-41941-321 Telephone$72.42011118CITY HALL INTERNET Total COMCAST-INTERNET 144.85 Unpaid CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$65.75114X64397207OFFICE WATER Total CULLIGAN BOTTLEDWATER 65.75 Unpaid ELMCREEK WATERSHED MGMTCOMM E100-41900-433 DuesandMemberships$14,663.98225ANNUAL ASSESSMENT Total ELM CREEK WATERSHEDMGMT COMM 14,663.98 Unpaid EVOLVINGSOLUTIONSINC E100-41951-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$1,350.0098970ITMANAGEDSERVICE - MONTHLY E100-41951-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$1,350.0099266ITMANAGEDSERVICE - MONTHLY Total EVOLVINGSOLUTIONSINC 2,700.00 Unpaid FERGUSON WATERWORKS E601-49400-215 WaterMeters$542.820271770METERS Total FERGUSONWATERWORKS 542.82 Unpaid GMACH, GEORGE G500-20414 GmachSketch Plan 17-004$1,245.50010918ESCROW REFUND G500-20425 GmachPrelim/FinalPlat17-017$1,459.10010918ESCROW REFUND Total GMACH, GEORGE 2,704.60 Unpaid GOPHERSTATEONE CALL E601-49400-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$25.008000295SERVICE E602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$25.008000295SERVICE Total GOPHER STATE ONECALL 50.00 Unpaid HEALTHPARTNERS E100-41300-131 Employer PaidHealth$388.0078273130HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18 INVOICE E100-41400-131 Employer PaidHealth$3,485.8978273130HEALTH PARTNERS1/18INVOICE E100-42100-131 EmployerPaidHealth$6,083.8478273130HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18INVOICE 01/19/1810:54AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 3 Check Detail Register© January 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment E100-42102-131 Employer PaidHealth$605.9078273130HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18 INVOICE E100-43100-131 Employer PaidHealth$5,699.9778273130HEALTH PARTNERS1/18INVOICE G100-20205 Reimbursements$1,481.5078273130HEALTHPARTNERS 1/18INVOICE - HAMILTON G100-20205 Reimbursements$1,849.5078273130HEALTH PARTNERS 1/18INVOICE - SCHUTTE E100-43100-131 EmployerPaidHealth$388.0078445342HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18 INVOICE E100-41400-131 EmployerPaidHealth$3,485.8978445342HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18INVOICE E100-42100-131 EmployerPaidHealth$6,083.8478445342HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18INVOICE E100-42102-131 Employer PaidHealth$605.9078445342HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18 INVOICE E100-43100-131 Employer PaidHealth$5,699.9778445342HEALTH PARTNERS2/18INVOICE G100-20205 Reimbursements$1,481.5078445342HEALTH PARTNERS2/18INVOICE G100-20205 Reimbursements$1,849.5078445342HEALTH PARTNERS 2/18INVOICE Total HEALTHPARTNERS 39,189.20 Unpaid HEINZ, BRANDON G100-21713 H RAPayable$392.79011618HRA REIMBURSEMENT - EYECARE Total HEINZ, BRANDON 392.79 Unpaid HENN COSHERIFF-MC129 E100-42100-301 Prisoner$210.001000103381PRISONER FEES - BOOKING/HOUSING Total HENNCOSHERIFF-MC129 210.00 Unpaid HENNCOTAXPAYER SERVICES E100-41900-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$180.7013-119-23-23-PROPERTY TAX Total HENNCOTAXPAYER SERVICES 180.70 Unpaid HENN CTYHUMANSERVICES DEPT E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$265.002018ANNUAL LICENSE Total HENN CTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPT 265.00 Unpaid I-94WESTCHAMBER E100-41900-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$25.005859STATEOF THE CITIES2018MARTENS E100-41900-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$25.005860STATE OF THE CITIES2018 THOMAS Total I-94WEST CHAMBER 50.00 Unpaid ICEMAN INDUSTRIES INC E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$661.5001856149 BAGS LAVAMELT Total ICEMAN INDUSTRIESINC 661.50 Unpaid KOTHRADE SEWER WATEREXCAVATIN E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$265.0021919KSEPTIC PUMPING Total KOTHRADE SEWER WATEREXCAVATIN 265.00 Unpaid LANDFORM G500-20396 Ravinia 4thAddition$500.0026828RAVINIA 4TH16-004 G500-20400 Ravinia5th & 6th$460.0026828RAVINIA 6TH16-016 E100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$40.6726828REIMBURSABLE E100-41911-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$4,653.5026840CORCORAN2040 COMPREHENSIVE 17-001 G500-20376 ParkPlace Storage$31.2526840PARKPLACESTORAGE 17-034 G500-20416 Sunrise Solar - 17-007$375.0026840SUNRISE SOLAR - 17-007 01/19/1810:54AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 4 Check Detail Register© January 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment G500-20430 BassLkCross FP, FPUD, 17-022$31.2526840BASS LAKECROSSING FP, FPUD, ANDDA17-022 E100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$2,093.7526840CITY MEETINGS E100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$60.9926840REIMBURSABLE E100-41910-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$31.2526840SCHUTTE INITIATE AGPRESERVE EXPIRATION 17- 041 E100-41910-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$230.0026840ORDINANCE AMENDMENTDOGKENNELS 17-037 E100-41910-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$31.2526840ORDINANCE AMENDMENTSMALLCELLS & DAS17- 039 E100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$371.5026840SIGN ORDINANCE - DYNAMIC SIGN 17-033 G500-20436 PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029$187.5026840PULTE SKETCHPLAN 17-029 G500-20443 PheasantAcresSPA17-035$1,050.2526840PHEASANT ACRES SPA17-035 G500-20442 Bass LakeEst. FP, PUD17-036$1,875.0026840BASSLAKEEST. FP, PUD17-036 G500-20444 SAC Wireless-Sprint17-040$125.0026840SACWIRELESS-SPRINT17-040 G500-20445 Ravinia9thFPandPUD17-042$62.5026840RAVINIA9TH FPANDPUD 17-042 Total LANDFORM 12,210.66 Unpaid LANOEQUIPMENT E100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$281.1302-530190SUPPLIES Total LANO EQUIPMENT 281.13 Unpaid LEAGUE OFMINNESOTACITIES E100-41300-208 TrainingandInstruction$99.002669862018 LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCEFOR CITIES Total LEAGUEOFMINNESOTA CITIES 99.00 Unpaid LORETTOFIREDEPARTMENT E100-42200-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$38,498.552-22182018FIREPROTECTION - 1ST QTR Total LORETTO FIREDEPARTMENT 38,498.55 Unpaid MAPLEGROVE, CITYOF E601-49400-311 Water Purchased$5,436.6418076WATER USAGE Total MAPLEGROVE, CITYOF 5,436.64 Unpaid MARTINMARIETTAAGGREGATES E100-43100-232 Gravel$4,203.0922101705CLASS2 Total MARTINMARIETTA AGGREGATES 4,203.09 Unpaid MCDONOUGH, MARK E202-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$12,900.00K9CONTRACK9CONTRACT Total MCDONOUGH, MARK 12,900.00 Unpaid MENARDSMAPLEGROVE E100-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$18.3514451REPAIRSUPPLIES E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$16.9714571SUPPLIES E100-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$5.9814588SUPPLIES Total MENARDS MAPLE GROVE 41.30 Unpaid METRO SALESINC E100-41130-351 Newsletter Expenses$614.95INV982633NEWSLETTER SUPPLIES E100-41951-207 ComputerSupplies$1,104.75INV982633NEWSLETTER SUPPLIES 01/19/1810:54AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 5 Check Detail Register© January 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment Total METROSALES INC 1,719.70 Unpaid MILLERCHEVROLET E100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$399.06CVW150464REPAIR PARTS Total MILLERCHEVROLET 399.06 Unpaid MNCRIMEPREVENTION ASSOC E100-42100-433 DuesandMemberships$45.00EKENBERGMEMBERSHIPDUES - EKENBERG Total MN CRIMEPREVENTION ASSOC 45.00 Unpaid MODERNMARKETING E100-42100-200 OfficeSupplies (GENERAL)$295.00MMI125709SUPPLIES Total MODERN MARKETING 295.00 Unpaid MPCA E100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)$400.00MS4STORM2018MS4STORMWATER PERMIT RENEWAL Total MPCA 400.00 Unpaid NAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORAN E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$10.78158868SUPPLIES Total NAPAAUTO PARTS - CORCORAN 10.78 Unpaid NORTHMEMORIAL EMSEDUCATION E100-42100-208 Training and Instruction$180.00P-DGWKD-22TRAINING Total NORTHMEMORIAL EMSEDUCATION 180.00 Unpaid NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC E100-41900-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$2,525.005131FINANCIAL REPORTING Total NORTHLAND SECURITIESINC 2,525.00 Unpaid RESOURCE TRAINING & SOLUTIONS E100-41400-131 Employer PaidHealth$664.50180102097165BCBSDECEMBER2017 INVOICE Total RESOURCETRAINING & SOLUTIONS 664.50 Unpaid ROGERS, CITYOF E100-42200-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)$27,957.85010918FIRE PROTECTION - 1STQUARTER Total ROGERS, CITYOF 27,957.85 Unpaid STEELMAN, PAULA E100-42100-417 Uniforms$250.00011718UNIFORM ALLOWANCE Total STEELMAN, PAULA 250.00 Unpaid SUNLIFEFINANCIAL E100-41300-131 EmployerPaidHealth$25.90237687-2018-0EMPLOYER PAIDHEALTH E100-41400-131 EmployerPaidHealth$28.40237687-2018-0EMPLOYER PAIDHEALTH E100-41920-131 EmployerPaidHealth$25.90237687-2018-0EMPLOYER PAIDHEALTH E100-42100-131 Employer PaidHealth$374.80237687-2018-0EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH E100-43100-131 Employer PaidHealth$75.60237687-2018-0EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH E100-42102-131 Employer PaidHealth$55.15237687-2018-0EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH 01/19/1810:54AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 6 Check Detail Register© January 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment G100-20205 Reimbursements$2.50237687-2018-0COBRA G100-21716 ShortTerm Disability$626.57237687-2018-0EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH G100-21717 LongTerm Disability$349.87237687-2018-0EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH Total SUNLIFEFINANCIAL 1,564.69 Unpaid TEGRETE E100-41941-400 Repairs & MaintCont (GENERAL$365.0072581MONTHLY CITYHALL CLEANING Total TEGRETE 365.00 Unpaid TERMINAL SUPPLY CO E100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$484.1077742-01SUPPLIES Total TERMINALSUPPLY CO 484.10 Unpaid USBANKCORP EQUIPMENTFINANCE E100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$348.70347772006COPIER LEASE Total USBANKCORP EQUIPMENTFINANCE 348.70 Unpaid VERIZONWIRELESS E100-42100-323 Radio Units$245.079798821240RADIO UNITS E100-42100-321 Telephone$342.679798821240CELL SERVICE Total VERIZONWIRELESS 587.74 Unpaid WESTSIDE WHOLESALETIRE E100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)$25.00804997SQUAD MAINTENANCE Total WESTSIDE WHOLESALETIRE 25.00 Unpaid WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOPELECT E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$40.36011618CTY RD10/116 000-0100-1469 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$171.34011618Ballpark: 120-1246-7200 E100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$21.41011618CIVIL DEFENSE: 120-1246-8000 E100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$21.77011618Maple Hill Est: 120-1246-8100 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$42.53011618SchoolProperty: 120-1247-9600 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$1,716.110116188200CtyRd116: 120-1255-6300 E100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$0.000116186510 CtyRd116: 150-1680-4662 E601-49400-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$22.8301161819090BassLkRd:150-1687-7510 E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$57.240116189525Cain Rd: 150-1689-5230 E602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$364.07011618Brockton Ln: 150-1689-6871 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$19.29011618Cty 10/Maple Hi: 120-1246-7300 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$40.32011618CTY 10/Treptaus: 120-1246-7400 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$40.32011618CTY 10/StThomas:120-1246-7500 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$40.32011618Cty 10/Stanchion:120-1246-7600 E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$40.32011618CoRd10 & 50: 120-1246-7700 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$20.410116188200 CtyRd116: 120-1246-7800 E100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$24.2101161875thAve/Hwy116:120-1246-7900 E100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$188.700116188200CtyRd116: 150-1684-2033 E100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL)$55.900116189100 CtyRd19: 150-1688-8463 E422-49450-530 ImprovementsOtherThan Bldgs$174.2301161820120 CTY10LIF:150-1691-6661 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$30.01011618Bridle/Gleason: 150-1690-5131 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$30.01011618Bridle/Paddock: 150-1690-5135 01/19/1810:54AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 7 Check Detail Register© January 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$30.01011618Paddock Ln150-1690-5137 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$30.01011618Bridle Path: 150-1690-5146 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$30.01011618Paddock/Bridle: 150-1690-5158 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$30.010116186471Carriage: 150-1691-0155 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$30.01011618Bridle/Steeple: 150-1691-0158 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$30.01011618Bridle/Bluestem: 150-1691-0168 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$30.01011618Prairie/Bridle: 150-1691-0174 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$30.01011618Bridle Path: 150-1691-0177 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$30.01011618ElderberryCt: 150-1691-0178 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$32.2201161866TH/CEDAR: 150-1692-8373 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$32.22011618Bridle/66th Ave: 150-1692-8374 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$0.000116186629CTY 101: 150-1691-8062 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$28.8901161819301 Annabelle: 150-1691-8063 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$28.890116186675Carriage: 150-1691-8064 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$28.890116186681 Bridle: 150-1691-8066 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$28.890116186657 Bridle: 150-1691-8079 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$28.8901161819130 Galloway: 150-1691-8080 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$28.8901161819065 Galloway: 150-1691-8082 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$32.700116186485 Larkspur: 150-1692-0907 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$43.350116186398 Larkspur: 150-1692-0908 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$16.3901161819437 LUPINE LN: 150-1693-0197 G500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights$16.3901161819389 LUPINE LN: 150-1693-0199 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$16.3901161819345GOLDENRODTRL: 150-1693-0200 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$16.390116186310 STEEPLECHASELN: 150-1693-0201 G500-20390 RaviniaStreetLights$16.390116186370 STEEPLECHASELN: 150-1693-0202 Total WRIGHT HENNEPINCOOPELECT 3,827.57 Unpaid XCELENERGY E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$34.86575118045STREET LIGHTING 9525 CAINROAD E100-43100-381 Street/SignalLights$27.78575613920STREET LIGHTING CR19/CR30 Total XCEL ENERGY 62.64 Unpaid ZEP SALES & SERVICE E100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)$268.019003205387SUPPLIES Total ZEP SALES & SERVICE 268.01 10100 Farmers StateBank$188,583.25 01/19/1810:54AMCITYOFCORCORAN Page 8 Check Detail Register© January 2018 Check AmtInvoiceComment FundSummary 10100 Farmers State Bank 100GENERALFUND$159,969.42 202POLICE DONATION FUND$12,900.00 422DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT$174.23 500ESCROWHOLDING FUND$8,128.24 601WATER$6,524.79 602 SEWER$886.57 188,583.25 CityofCorcoran ConsultantSummary 1/25/2018 NameInvoice DateAmount Due Carson, Clelland & Scherder Landform01/16/18 12,210.66 MetroWestInspection Rolf EricksonEnterprises Wenck Associates Total$ 12,210.66 H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\Council Claims\\2018ClaimsWorkbook 20\ 7 Vendor. Landform CITY OF CORCORAN Date: 1-16-18 PAYMENT VOUCHER Address:Landform Suite 513 Payment Total: $ 12,210.66 105 South Fifth Ave Minneapolis,MN 55401 INV DATE:02/15/18 Fund Department Account Description Invoice it Amount 110041910300CorcoranPlanning 100 41910 300 City Meetings 26840 2,093.75 100 41910 300 REIMBURSABLE 26840 60.99 100_ 41910 300 REIMBURSABLE 26828 40.67 100 41910 _ 300 Schutte Initiate Ag Preserve Expiration 17-041 26840 31.25 100 41910 300 Ordinance Amendment Dog Kennels 17-037 26840 230.00 100 41910 300 Ordinance Amendment Small Cells&DAS 17-039 26840 31.25 100 41910 300 Sign Ordinance-Dynamic Sign 17-033 26840 371.50 100 41910 300 Mayers Ag Preserve 17-019 101 41911 300 CORCORAN 2040 COMPREHENSIVE 17-001 26840 4,653.50 100 41910 300 SOLAR GARDEN MORATORIUM 17-018 100 41910 300 HENNEPIN COUNTY WEATHER STATION 500 20285 HOPE MINISTRIES 12-002 500 20338 HOPE CENTER 500 20376 PARK PLACE STORAGE 16-027 500 20376 PARK PLACE STORAGE 17-034 26840 31.25 500 20389 STREHLER ESTATES 16-001 500 20392 MN SOLAR IUP 16-032 500 20396 I RAVINIA 4TH 16-004 26828 500.00 500 I 20400 RAVINIA 6TH 16-016 26828 460.00 500 20400 RAVINIA 5TH 16-015 500 1 20404 T_ LENNAR SCHWALBE PUD __ 500 20406 RAVINIA 7TH PUD 16-030 500 20407 MOTOR CAFE PUD 16-033 500 20409 WILLOW BROOK 16-035 500 20411 SUNRISE SOLAR 17-003 500 20413 RAVINIA 8TH FP AND PUD 17-002 500 20414 Gmach Sketch 17-004 500 20415 M-I Homes Sketch 17-006 500 20416 Sunrise Solar-17-007 26840 375.00 L 500 20418 Pheasant Ridge 17-00.9 500 20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 500 20421 Ravinia 7th Addit-FP 17-013 500 20422 Motley Lot Line Adjust 17-014 500 20423 Bass Lake Est Skch PUD 17-015 500 20424 Schilling Administrative Permit 17-016 500_ 20425 Gmach Farms Preliminary&Final Plat 17-017 500 20429 Good Dog MN IUP/CHOL 17-021 500 20430 Bass Lake Crossing FP,FPUD and DA 17-022 26840 31.25 ; 500 20431 Bass Lk Cross Lot Adj, 17-023 500 20432 HALES CORNER 2ND ADD. 17-025 500 20433 BASS LAKE EST CPA,PP,RZ PUD 17-024 500 . 20434 HOPPE LOT COMBO 17-027 500 20435 Red Barn Pet Ret.-CUP 17-028 i 500 20436 PULTE SKETCH PLAN 17-029 26840 187.50 1 500 20440 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 17-032 500 20443 Pheasant Acres SPA 17-035 26840 1,050.25 500 20442 BASS LAKE EST.FP,PUD 17-036 26840 1,875.00 1 500 1 20444 SAC Wireless-Sprint 17-040 26840 125.00 1 500_ 20445 Ravinia 9th FP and PUD 17-042 26840 62.50 TOTAL: $ 12,210.66 Approv.d Notes Check it 1 31167 i 1\44 1 LAND F O R M From Site to Finish 1 I - 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612-252-9070 Suite 513 Fax: 612-252-9077 City of Corcoran Minneapolis,MN 55401 Web: landform.net 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran,MN 55340 d;: .NV410E No.26840 01/11/2018 Corcoran Planning Services COR17015.GEN Contract/PO#: For Services Rendered Through 12/31/2017 001-Corcoran 2040 Comprehensive Plan(city file 17-001) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra S 31.00 125.00 $3,875.00 Pierquet, Danyelle P 5.75 115.00 661.25 Shay, Kevin 1.75 67.00 117.25 Total Professional Services for.001 4,653.50 Total Charges for.001 101'111111'3W 4,653.50 007-Sunrise Solar-CR 50(city file 17-007) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahi,Kendra S 3.00 125.00 375.00 Total Professional Services for.007 375.00 Total Charges for.007 Son-Loy j 375.00 022-Bass Lake Crossing FP, FPUD and DA(city file 17-022) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahi,Kendra S 25 125.00 31.25 Total Professional Services for.022 31.25 Total Charges for.022 0._20,,+30 - $31.25 Page 1 of 4 Project COR17015.GEN Corcoran Planning Services Invoice 26840 029-Pulte Sketch Plan(city file 17-029) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra S 1.50 125.00 187.50 Total Professional Services for.029 187.50 Total Charges for.029 50o-20936 187.50 033-Sign Ordinance-Dynamic Sign Update(city file 17-033) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S 1.50 125.00 187.50 Matze, Mary L 2.00 92.00 184.00 Total Professional Services for.033 371.50 Total Charges for.033 100-1-11`11u.3vu 371.50 Q34 ParktPlace Storage Phase 2(city file 17-034) ofessioal Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra S 25 125.00 31.25 Total Professional Services for.034 31.25 Total Charges for.034 506-z037‘ 31.25 035-Pheasant Acres SPA(city file 17-035) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra S 3.25 125.00 406.25 Matze, Mary L 7.00 92.00 644.00 Total Professional Services for.035 1,050.25 Total Charges for.035 5bb ZOL11 1,050.25 6- ss Lake Estates FP and Final PUD(city file 17-036) frQfassiolal Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S 15.00 125.00 $1,875.00 Total Professional Services for.036 1,875.00 Total Charges for.036 Sop- Zo'142 - $1,875.00 037-Ordinance Amendment-Dog Kennels(city file 17-037) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra S 50 125.00 62.50 Shay,Kevin 2.50 67.00 167.50 Total Professional Services for.037 230.00 too Li''VO `33y Page 2 of 4 Project COR17015.GEN Corcoran Planning Services Invoice 26840 Total Charges for.037 230.00 039-Ordinance Amendment-Small Cells and DAS(city file 17-039) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S 25 125.00 31.25 Total Professional Services for.039 31.25 Total Charges for.039 I by-11)11°3°1) 31.25 040-SAC Wireless Admin Permit(city file 17-040) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S 1.00 125.00 125.00 Total Professional Services for.040 125.00 Total Charges for.040 5-00-2611V 125.00 041.-Schutte Initiate Ag Preserve Expiration(city file 17-041) 7ofessl4 Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S 25 125.00 31.25 Total Professional Services for.041 31.25 Total Charges for.041 I(f(C)_3U 31.25 042-Ravinia 9th FP and Final PUD(city file 17-042) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S 50 125.00 62.50 Total Professional Services for.042 62.50 Total Charges for.042 SW L01414 S 62.50 90-City Business anal Servicas_ Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl,Kendra S 16.75 125.00 $2,093.75 Total Professional Services for.90 2,093.75 Total Charges for.90 106-911I0 r 300 2,093.75 Reimbursable Invoice Unit Rate Qty Markup Amount 99 City Expenses Lindahl, Kendra S 820 54 114.00 1.00 60.99 Total for City Expenses 60.99 Total Reimbursable I00_v(1'110'300 60.99 Page 3 of 4 Project COR17015.GEN Corcoran Planning Services Invoice 26840 Invoice Amount $11,209.99 Please remit to: Landform, 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Please include invoice number on remittance. Page 4 of 4 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:26840 Invoice Date: 1/11/2018 Transaction ID: 11294 Labor Transactions P/E Date Employee Labor Code Work Date Hrs Effort CORI 7015.GEN..001 Corcoran 2040 Comprehensive Plan(city file 17-001) 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/4/2017 2.00 250.00 housing chapter 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/5/2017 2.00 250.00 land use chapter 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/6/2017 2.00 250.00 draft chapters/discuss schedule 12115/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/7/2017 0.50 62.50 additional information from applicant 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/8/2017 2.00 250.00 draft chapters/edits/mapping 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/9/2017 3.00 375.00 draft land use chapter edits 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/11/2017 1.00 125.00 mapping coordination with Wenck 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/12/2017 2.00 250.00 housing chapter complete and post to smartsheet 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/14/2017 2.00 250.00 comp plan chapters 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/15/2017 6.00 750.00 comp plan chapters 12/15/2017 Pierquet,Danyelle P 12/4/2017 1.50 172.50 parks and trails chapter calcuations 12/15/2017 Pierquet,Danyelle P 12/5/2017 1.00 115.00 finalize parks and trails edits for submittal 12/15/2017 Pierquet,Danyelle P 12/11/2017 0.25 28.75 parks chapter update 12/15/2017 Pierquet,Danyelle P 12/14/2017 1.25 143.75 parks chapter aerials,map and text edits 12/15/2017 Pierquet,Danyelle P 12/15/2017 1.00 115.00 finalize parks chapter text and graphics 12/15/2017 Shay,Kevin 12/7/2017 0.75 50.25 Edits to the housing chapter. 12/15/2017 Shay,Kevin 12/12/2017 0.75 50.25 Edits to the housing chapter. 12/31/2017 Pierquet,Danyelle P 12/18/2017 0.75 86.25 add/update trail info to parks chapter 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/18/2017 5.50 687.50 Draft land use plan 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/19/2017 2.00 250.00 finalize and send land use chapter/review LSWMP and provide comments 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/20/2017 1.00 125.00 city team meeting 1/11/2018 2:34:51 PM 1 of 5 1 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:26840 Invoice Date: 1/11/2018 Transaction ID: 11294 12/31/2017 Shay,Kevin 12/18/2017 0.25 16.75 Talk with Kendra about pivot tables for land use. Total for COR17015.GEN..001 38.50 4,653.50 CORI 7015.GEN..007 Sunrise Solar-CR 50(city file 17-007) 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/20/2017 0.50 62.50 Sunrise questions 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/21/2017 1.00 125.00 sunrise questions and updated zoning letter 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/7/2017 0.25 31.25 Phone call with Joe about next steps 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/14/2017 1.00 125.00 zoning letter for sunrise 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/15/2017 0.25 31.25 Phone calls Total for COR17015.GEN..007 3.00 375.00 COR17015.GEN..022 Bass Lake Crossing FP,FPUD and DA(city file 17-022) 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/5/2017 0.25 31.25 review easement documents from city attorney Total for COR17015.GEN..022 0.25 31.25 COR17015.GEN..029 Pulte Sketch Plan(city file 17-029) 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/19/2017 1.00 125.00 park needs analysis for Pulte 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/20/2017 0.25 31.25 discuss parks with Brad 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/21/2017 0.25 31.25 follow up with Pulte on Parks Total for COR17015.GEN..029 1.50 187.50 COR17015.GEN..033 Sign Ordinance-Dynamic Sign Update(city file 17-033) 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/15/2017 1.00 125.00 finalize report/PC packet 12115/2017 Matze,Mary L 12/14/2017 1.50 138.00 Staff report,FOF,and Ordinance update 12/15/2017 Matze,Mary L 12/15/2017 0.25 23.00 Review edits 12/31/2017 Matze,Mary L 12/18/2017 0.25 23.00 Finalize packet. 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/19/2017 0.50 62.50 finalize packet and send for PC Total for COR17015.GEN..033 3.50 371.50 COR17015.GEN..034 Park Place Storage Phase 2(city file 17-034) 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/4/2017 0.25 31.25 coordinate on LOC#2 Total for COR17015.GEN..034 0.25 31.25 COR17015.GEN..035 Pheasant Acres SPA(city file 17-035) 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/4/2017 0.25 31.25 1/11/2018 2:34:51 PM 2 of 5 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:26840 Invoice Date:1/11/2018 Transaction ID: 11294 call from Bob and set up appointment 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/6/2017 1.00 125.00 DRC meeting/meeting with applicant 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/12/2017 1.00 125.00 review plans and draft complete letter/MC review of CPA approved and filed 12/31/2017 Matze,Mary L 12/21/2017 4.00 368.00 Review plans,discuss with Kendra.PC Staff Report. 12131/2017 Matze,Mary L 12/22/2017 3.00 276.00 finalize staff report,resolution and packet. 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/22/2017 1.00 125.00 finalize PC packet Total for COR17015.GEN..035 10.25 1,050.25 COR17015.GEN..036 Bass Lake Estates FP and Final PUD(city file 17-036) 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/1/2017 1.00 125.00 talk to PW director/finalize and send incomplete letter 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/4/2017 1.00 125.00 call with Stradman/review plans/met council questions 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/5/2017 0.50 62.50 Floodplain issue discussion with city engineer and applicant engineer 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/6/2017 0.50 62.50 coordinate with applicants engineer 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/7/2017 1.50 187.50 revisions/coordinate with applicant 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/8/2017 1.00 125.00 phone call with MC staff/send additional materials 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/11/2017 0.50 62.50 review revised plans 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/12/2017 1.00 125.00 review materials and draft complete letter 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/19/2017 1.00 125.00 Council memo-financial guarantee 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/20/2017 0.50 62.50 DRC discussion 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/21/2017 4.50 562.50 revised plans from applicant/draft staff report for PC 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/22/2017 2.00 250.00 finalize PC packet Total for COR17015.GEN..036 15.00 1,875.00 COR17015.GEN..037 Ordinance Amendment-Dog Kennels(city file 17-037) 12/15/2017 Shay,Kevin 12/14/2017 2.00 134.00 Edits to the staff report. Talk through with Kendra 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/19/2017 0.50 62.50 finalize and send PC packet 12/31/2017 Shay,Kevin 12/19/2017 0.50 33.50 1/11/2018 2:34:51 PM 3 of 5 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:26840 Invoice Date: 1/11/2018 Transaction ID: 11294 Make edits to the staff report and pull together packet for PC. Total for COR17015.GEN..037 3.00 230.00 COR17015.GEN..039 Ordinance Amendment-Small Cells and DAS(city file 17-039) 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/1/2017 0.25 31.25 research ordinances Total for COR17015.GEN..039 0.25 31.25 COR17015.GEN..040 SAC Wireless Admin Permit(city file 17-040) 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/12/2017 0.50 62.50 review application and draft incomplete letter 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/13/2017 0.25 31.25 send incomplete letter and coordinate with applicant 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/14/2017 0.25 31.25 2nd incomplete letter Total for COR17015.GEN..040 1.00 125.00 COR17015.GEN..041 Schutte Initiate Ag Preserve Expiration(city file 17-041) 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/19/2017 0.25 31.25 project set up Total for COR17015.GEN..041 0.25 31.25 COR17015.GEN..042 Ravinia 9th FP and Final PUD(city file 17-042) 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/19/2017 0.25 31.25 project set up 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/20/2017 0.25 31.25 review plans at DRC Total for COR17015.GEN..042 0.50 62.50 COR17015.GEN..90 City Business 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/4/2017 1.00 125.00 DRC agenda/calls and emails 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/5/2017 0.50 62.50 calls and emails 12115/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/6/2017 2.00 250.00 office hours 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/7/2017 0.50 62.50 follow up with maple grove on plat/reach out to Rogers on comp plan status 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/8/2017 1.00 125.00 zoning calls/emails 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/11/2017 1.00 125.00 DRC agenda 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/13/2017 4.00 500.00 office hours 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/14/2017 0.50 62.50 calls and emails 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/18/2017 1.00 125.00 zoning questions from Ravinia resident/DRC agenda/PC agenda 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/19/2017 1.25 156.25 send planning project update/phone calls 1/11/2018 2:34:51 PM 4 of 5 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:26840 Invoice Date: 1/11/2018 Transaction ID: 11294 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/20/2017 3.00 375.00 office hours 12/31/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/21/2017 1.00 125.00 calls and emails Total for COR17015.GEN..90 16.75 2,093.75 Total labor 94.00 11,149.00 Employee Reimbursable Transactions Check No. Payee Expense Code Check Date Units Effort COR17015.GEN..99 City Expenses 820 Lindahl,Kendra S Reimb Project Mileage 12/31/2017 34.00 18.19 office hours 820 Lindahl,Kendra S Reimb Project Mileage 12/31/2017 34.00 18.19 office hours 820 Lindahl,Kendra S Reimb Project Mileage 12/31/2017 46.00 24.61 office hours Total for COR17015.GEN..99 114.00 60.99 Total reimbursements 114.00 60.99 1/11/2018 2:34:51 PM 5 of 5 L A N D F OR M From Site to Finish I l.+ 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612-252-9070 Suite 513 Fax: 612-252-9077 City of Corcoran Minneapolis,MN 55401 Web: landfo rm.net 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran,MN 55340 4N. iCE No.26828 01/10/2018 Corcoran Planning Services COR16014.GEN Contract/P0#: For Services Rendered Through 12/31/2017 004-Ravinia,4th Addition Final PUD and Final Plat(city file 16-004) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahi,Kendra S 4.00 125.00 500.00 Total Professional Services for.004 500.00 Total Charges for.004 566-zoN 500.00 016-Ravinia 6th Addition Final PUD and Plat(city file 16-016) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Pierquet, Danyelle P 4.00 115.00 460.00 Total Professional Services for.016 460.00 Total Charges for.016 5'&"Z°N(31') 460.00 Reimbursable Invoice Unit Rate Qty Markup Amount 004 Ravinia 4th Addition Final PUD and Final Plat city file 16-004) Lindahi, Kendra S 820 54 45.00 1.00 24.08 Pierquet, Danyelle P 818 54 31.00 1.00 16.59 Total for Ravinia 4th Addition Final PUD and Final 40.67 Plat(city file 16-004) Total Reimbursable 40.67 160-14 111`)-360 Invoice Amount 1,000.67 Page 1 of 2 Project COR16014.GEN Corcoran Planning Services Invoice 26828 Please remit to: Landform, 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Please include invoice number on remittance. Page 2 of 2 Linked Invoice Transactions - Landform Professional Services, LLC Invoice No.:26828 Invoice Date: 1/10/2018 Transaction ID: 11281 Labor Transactions P/E Date Employee Labor Code Work Date Hrs Effort COR16014.GEN..004 Ravinia 4th Addition Final PUD and Final Plat(city file 16-004) 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/1/2017 1.00 125.00 talk to Lennar and city staff about Tuesday landscape meeting 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/4/2017 0.50 62.50 ravinia pre-meeting landscape call 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/5/2017 2.00 250.00 landscaping site visit/meeting with Lennar 12/15/2017 Lindahl,Kendra S 12/6/2017 0.50 62.50 follow up on landscape meeting Total for COR16014.GEN..004 4.00 500.00 COR16014.GEN..016 Ravinia 6th Addition Final PUD and Plat(city file 16-016) 12/15/2017 Pierquet,Danyelle P 12/4/2017 1.00 115.00 internal meeting and site visit prep for phases 1,2,3, 4 and 6. 12/15/2017 Pierquet,Danyelle P 12/5/2017 2.50 287.50 site visit with Lennar, City and landscape contractors 12/15/2017 Pierquet,Danyelle P 12/7/2017 0.50 57.50 next steps with KL Total for COR16014.GEN..016 4.00 460.00 Total labor 8.00 960.00 Employee Reimbursable Transactions Check No. Payee Expense Code Check Date Units Effort COR16014.GEN..004 Ravinia 4th Addition Final PUD and Final Plat(city file 16-004) 818 Pierquet,Danyelle P Reimb Project Mileage 12/31/2017 31.00 16.59 site visit with Lennar and City teams 820 Lindahl,Kendra S Reimb Project Mileage 12/31/2017 45.00 24.08 Ravinia Landscape Meeting with Lennar Total for COR16014.GEN..004 76.00 40.67 Total reimbursements 76.00 40.67 1/10/2018 9:34:54 AM 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 8a. Council Meeting: January 25, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commission Representatives Action Required: None – Informational Summary: The advisory commission representatives for the January 25th Council meeting are as follows: • Planning Commission: Dean Jacobs • Parks and Trails Commission: Judy Strehler Financial/Budget: N/A Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: OPEN AND HONEST COMMUNICATION We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY We believe that every employee and citizen should be afforded an equal opportunity to participate in all aspects of employment, citizenship, and governance in the City of Corcoran based exclusively on their ability to contribute. Options: N/A Recommendation N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: N/A Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 MEMORANDUM 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net DATE January 16, 2018 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications Projects in italics are new Project marked with an * have moved from active to approved The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1.2040 Corcoran Comprehensive Plan (City file 17-001). This year-long process was kicked off with a joint City Council/Commission work session on March 16th followed by a community open house on April 17th and several commission meetings and Council work sessions. The next public event is an open house tentatively scheduled for January 29, 2018. The next Council work session is scheduled for February 15th. 2.Sign Ordinance Update (city file 17-033). The Council asked staff to bring back options for increasing the amount of dynamic message boards allowed in the City. At the October 26th meeting, the Council directed staff to schedule this item for a public hearing at the Planning Commission to increase the allowed area of dynamic sign to 60% and reduce the message change limit from 12 to 6 seconds. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their January 4th meeting and recommended approval. The City Council will act at the January 25th Council meeting. 3.Pheasant Acres Golf Club at 10705 County Road 116 (city file 17-035). Pheasant Acres has applied for a site plan amendment and variance to allow the replacement and expansion of two accessory buildings. The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their January 4th meeting and recommended approval. The City Council will act at the January 25th Council meeting. 4.Bass Lake Estates Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat at 19235 and 19219 CR 10 (PID 2511923440002 and 2511923440003) (City file 17-036). The Final PUD Development Plan was reviewed at the January 4th Planning Commission meeting. The applicant went to the December 28th and January 11th meeting to ask for a waiver from the development contract letter of credit requirements. The Council agreed. The Final Plat and Final PUD Development Plan will be reviewed by the Council on January 25th. However, staff and the City attorney will need to rewrite the development agreement to address the different financial guarantees, therefore, the Development Agreement will be a condition of plat approval and will be brought back to the February 22nd Council meeting for approval. 5.Dog Kennel Ordinance Update (City file 17-037). The Council directed the Planning Commission to review the Kennel standards in the ordinance and make a recommendation about whether any changes are needed. The Commission discussed the item at their October 5th meeting and asked that it be placed on a future meeting agenda for more discussion. The Planning Commission discussed this at the January 4th meeting and their recommendation will be presented to the Council at the January 25th meeting for consideration. Agenda Item 8b. MEMORANDUM 2 6. Animal Ordinance (city file 17-038). The City has received questions about allowing animals in commercial areas, specifically bees and chickens. Staff will prepare a memo for the January 25th meeting to discuss the issues and get Council direction on possible ordinance amendments. 7. Small Cell and DAS Ordinance Amendment (City file 17-039). Minnesota’s telecommunications right-of-way user state law (SF1456), regarding small wireless facilities, was signed into law on May 30, 2017. It grants wireless service providers access to the public right-of-way to construct, maintain and operate small wireless facilities and wireless support structures. Various sections of the city and zoning code need to be amended to be consistent with state law. Staff will prepare a memo for January 25th Council meeting to outline the issues. This could be scheduled for a Public Hearing at the Planning Commission and Council action in March/April. 8. SAC Wireless Administrative Permit for new Antenna on the existing tower at 23400 County Road 10 (PID 07-119-23-43-0004) (city file no. 17-040). The applicant is currently incomplete. The permit can be administratively approved. 9. Schutte – Initiate Expiration of Agricultural Preserve (PID 13-119-23-42-0001 and 13-119-23-31- 0001) (city file 17-041). This item will be placed on the January 25th Council agenda. Also, there are several projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out: 1. Corcoran Business Park (City file 06-005). The City Council granted a one-year extension to the final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and is still working to close out this project. Staff has spoken to the applicant and will schedule a meeting when more information is available on the Loretto sewer project. 2. Hope Ministries Conditional Use Permit for Cemetery and Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easement at 19951 Oswald Farm Road (City file 12-002). Hope Ministries submitted a request for a conditional use permit to allow a cemetery west of the existing church. The application was approved by the City Council on March 22nd and site work had begun. The letter of credit for site improvements has been released, but we are holding the escrow pending completion of the approved landscaping. The applicant has indicated that they are considering a site plan amendment application to modify the approved plans. Staff met again with Pastor Brian Lother in July 2017 to discuss the outstanding issues and future expansion plans on the property. 3. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning for on Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14-027). The City Council approved the request on December 11, 2014 and granted the applicant 2 years to apply for the final plat and final PUD development plan. Peachtree Partners did not buy the property, but a different developer could still proceed with the approved plan. On December 9, 2016, the applicant submitted a written request to extend the approvals for an additional year. Staff recommended that this request be reviewed by the City Council, but adequate time was not provided to place this on a Council agenda prior to expiration. Staff administratively approved an extension until February 28, 2017 so that this request for extension could be considered at the February 23, 2017 Council meeting. At that meeting, the City Council approved a one year extension. The applicant has requested another extension. This request will be placed on the January 25th Council agenda. 4. Commercial Door Addition at 7670 Commerce Street (City file 15-010) The City received an application for approval of a building addition, which required a conditional use permit, interim use permit, variance and site plan approval. The project was reviewed at a public hearing at the June 4th Planning Commission meeting and was approved by the City Council on June 25th. The required landscaping will be finalized and constructed after the downtown infrastructure project is completed. The City will release the remaining escrow when the planting is completed. 5. Private Drive Ordinance Amendment (City file 16-003). The City Council approved an ordinance amendment allowing private drives in the Rural Residential district, subject to certain conditions. However, after adoption the City Council directed staff to revisit this issue and consider an ordinance amendment to eliminate the requirement that private drives off paved roads must be paved. The City Council approved the amendment on May 26th. The Council also identified additional issues that should be reviewed and discussed at a future date. MEMORANDUM 3 6. Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC request for sketch plan review of “Encore” at 9975 CR 101 (PID 12-119-23-12-0001) (city file 17-029). Pulte has submitted a sketch plan review for a residential development on this property. The item was reviewed by the City Council at the September 28th meeting. 7. Park Place Storage Phase 2 (City file 17-034). The Master Plan for Park Place Storage was approved in 2016. The Council approved the entire project but noted that each phase would need to submit for site plan approval. This was primarily a condition to ensure that all engineering issues were adequately addressed for each phase. Phase I is under construction and the applicant has submitted an application for administrative site plan approval for Phase 2 (to the south of Phase 1). The application was administratively approved. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 8c. Council Meeting: January 25, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Environmental Assessment Worksheet - Encore Action Required: None – Informational Summary: On September 28, 2017 the City Council reviewed a concept plan for a development called Encore in northeast Corcoran. Since that time staff and the developer have continued conversation on the project. Most recently the City has worked with the developer to initiate the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) process. An EAW is required for proposed residential developments with 250 or more unattached units. The EAW will be completed and sent to the City Council for review at which point it will be requested to submit the document for a 30 day review period. This is currently anticipated for the February 22, 2018 meeting. No action is required at this time. A quick reference report on EAW’s is attached to this report. Financial/Budget: N/A Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: OPEN AND HONEST COMMUNICATION We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY We believe that every employee and citizen should be afforded an equal opportunity to participate in all aspects of employment, citizenship, and governance in the City of Corcoran based exclusively on their ability to contribute. Options: N/A Recommendation N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: Quick Reference: Environmental Assessment Worksheet Quick Reference: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) 1 Quick Reference: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Updated July 2017 Quick Reference: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) 2 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Overview The EAW is a brief document designed to lay out the basic facts of a project necessary to determine if an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required for the proposed project. The EAW form consists of 20 questions that provide the information needed to determine if the project will have significant environmental impacts. In addition to the legal purpose of the EAW in determining the need for an EIS, the EAW also provides permit information, informs the public about the project, and helps identify ways to protect the environment. The EAW is not meant to approve or deny a project, but instead act as a source of information to guide other approvals and permitting decisions. The EAW is completed by the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) designated according to Minnesota Rules 4410. Please note that this quick reference guide is not intended to substitute for Minnesota Rules 4410. It is designed to help RGUs and others implement the environmental review process more effectively and efficiently. The guide does not alter the rules or change their meaning; if any inconsistencies arise between this guide and the rules, the rules take precedent. Please contact EQB Staff with any questions at Env.Review@state.mn.us or 651-757-2873. Environmental Review Exemptions Some projects of a specific size and nature are exempted from the environmental review process as indicated in Minnesota Rules 4410.4600. If a project is identified as exempt, then it is not required to go through environmental review in order to move forward. Mandatory Environmental Review Projects that meet or exceed the thresholds described in Minnesota Rules 4410.4300 are required to complete an EAW. If a project meets or exceeds the thresholds described in Minnesota Rules 4410.4400, then an EIS is required. When determining if a project meets a mandatory environmental review category threshold, it is important to keep in mind any connected actions, phased actions, or project expansions within the last three years that cumulatively may trigger mandatory environmental review. These provisions are described in Minnesota Rules 4410.1000, Subpart 4, and Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subpart 1 respectively. Discretionary Environmental Review Projects that are not exempt nor require a mandatory environmental review can still go through the EAW process according to Minnesota Rules 4410.1000, Subpart 3. A government unit with approval authority over a project can order a discretionary EAW if it determines that the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects. A discretionary EAW can be particularly appropriate for projects with some possibility of significant adverse environmental impacts or the perception of such. A discretionary EAW can help the RGU identify the adverse environmental impacts of a project and their severity. Additionally, discretionary environmental review may be ordered by a RGU in response to a citizen petition or if the project proposer Quick Reference: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) 3 wishes to initiate environmental review to determine if the project has the potential for significant environmental impacts. Steps in the EAW Process (Minnesota Rules 4410.1000 – 1700) The EAW should be prepared as early as practicable in the project development process. The RGU as designated in Minnesota Rules 4410 is responsible for preparing the EAW based on data submitted by the project proposer. The EAW process includes a comment period and the option for an RGU to host a public meeting to gather additional comments. Once the EAW process is completed, the RGU must make a decision on the need for an EIS. Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, Subpart 1 specifies that a positive EIS decision shall be made for projects that “have the potential for significant environmental effects”. If a project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects, then the RGU shall issue a negative EIS decision, and the project can move forward Quick Reference: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) 4 RGU orders a discretionary EAW or a mandatory EAW is required (4410.1000) Project proposer submits completed data portions of EAW to the RGU (4410.1400) RGU reviews project proposer’s data submittal and makes determination of completeness within 30 days (4410.1400) RGU deems data submittal incomplete and returns submittal to project proposer for completion of missing data (4410.1400) RGU deems data submittal complete and notifies project proposer within 5 days (4410.1400) RGU adds supplemental information to EAW, if necessary, and approves EAW for distribution within 30 days (4410.1400) RGU distributes the draft EAW for comments and publishes notice in the EQB Monitor. RGU publishes notice in local newspaper within 5 days of distribution (4410.1500) Reviewers have 30 days to submit written comments to the RGU. The RGU may host a public meeting to gather comments (4410.1600) RGU must make EIS need decision within 15 days of end of comment period, or up to 30 days if decision is to be made by a board or council (4410.1700 Subp. 2) RGU makes EIS need decision and prepares record of decision, including findings of fact and responses to all substantive comments (4410.1700 Subp. 3 & 4) RGU makes positive EIS declaration and includes studies to gather missing info in scope of EIS (4410.1700 Subp. 2a A) RGU postpones EIS need decision for up to 30 days to obtain missing information. RGU provides written notice to affected parties (4410.1700 Subp. 2a B) RGU distributes notice of decision within 5 days of decision. Notice is published in EQB Monitor (4410.1700 Subp. 5) Incomplete Submittal/Resubmittal Complete Submittal Sufficient Information Insufficient Information Obtain Missing Information 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Mary Matze through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: January 17, 2018 for the January 25, 2018 City Council meeting RE: City-initiated Sign Ordinance Update (city file 17-033) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:NA 1.Application Request Update Dynamic Display signs in the City of Corcoran. 2.Planning Commission Review Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing at their regularly schedule January 4, 2018 meeting. No one spoke at the public hearing. Commissioners voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed changes. 3. Background At the March 2015 work session, the City Council identified a number of priorities for 2015. One of those priorities was an update to the sign ordinance. After working with City staff to identify the most critical updates, City Council authorized re-writing the sign ordinance to address concerns raised by local business owners and development professionals. Staff re-wrote the sign ordinance and presented a draft to City Council on June 11, 2015. Council members were comfortable with increasing sign sizes and felt that design of the sign was more critical than size. Council members discussed the role of dynamic signage within the community. While it is currently prohibited, Council members felt that a conservative use of dynamic signs should be permitted. Council directed staff to revise the draft to include conservative regulations for dynamic signs. The Council indicated that it was important that the dynamic sign be a component of a sign, rather than comprise the entire sign. The Planning Commission reviewed the draft ordinance on July 7, 2015. There was some feeling that the dynamic sign (changeable message sign) time minimum of 12 seconds was too conservative and that the allowable size was too small. A representative from the sign industry suggested that the sign area be increased to 37.5% of the allowable sign copy so that the standard dynamic sign panel could fit on the signs. Agenda Item 9a. COR17-033 Dynamic Display Ordinance Update 2 January 4, 2018 Staff noted that the 12 second standard was adopted from the United States Sign Council recommendation. City standards vary from 3 seconds to 30 minutes. The Planning Commission recommended this a starting point noting that the ordinance can be amended if the City finds that the standards are too restrictive. Staff agrees that the 37.5% suggestion would allow a more standard 3x8 dynamic sign, but for the ease of reading we recommended that 40% be used in the ordinance. The Council approved the new ordinance on July 23, 2015. At the September 28, 2017 Council meeting, Council asked staff to review sizing of the dynamic displays. At the October 26, 2017 City Council meeting, Council direct staff to revise the allowable percentage of dynamic signs to 60% of the sign copy area with a six-second delay in all districts. 4. Analysis Changeable Message Boards and Dynamic Signs The ordinance was updated in 2015 to permit limited dynamic signage. Under the ordinance, one dynamic sign per lot would be permitted and dynamic signs would only be permitted on freestanding signs. After working with the ordinance for a year, the Council felt that the dynamic sign limitations were too restrictive and directed staff to amend the ordinance to increase the allowable dynamic display area to 60% of the sign copy area and to allow sign copy to change six seconds in all districts that allow dynamic signs. The draft ordinance amends the language as directed by the City Council. The proposed language is as follows (deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material): 7. Dynamic Displays. Dynamic displays as permitted by section 84.05 (Sign Standards) are subject to the following conditions: a) Only one dynamic display sign shall be allowed per lot. b) Dynamic displays are allowed only on freestanding signs. Dynamic displays may occupy no more than 40%60% of the actual sign area. The remainder of the sign must not have the capability to have dynamic displays even if not used. Only one, contiguous electronic message sign area is allowed on a sign face. c) A dynamic display sign may not change or move more often than once every 12 6 seconds except one for which changes are necessary to correct hour and minute, date, or temperature information. d) The images and messages displayed and transitioned must be instantaneous or fading. Modes of display which cause the message to flash or blink are prohibited. COR17-033 Dynamic Display Ordinance Update 3 January 4, 2018 e) Dynamic displays must be designed and equipped to freeze the device in one position if a malfunction occurs. The displays must also be equipped with a means to immediately discontinue the display if it malfunctions, and the sign owner must immediately stop the dynamic display when notified by the city that it is not complying with the standards of this section. f) Electronic message signs must comply with the lighting and brightness standards contained in this section. 5. Recommendation Move to adopt the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: a. Ordinance 2018-363 amending the sign ordinance b. Summary Ordinance 2018-364 c. Resolution 2018-05 approving findings of fact for the ordinance amendment Attachments 1. Ordinance 2018-363 amending the sign ordinance 2. Summary Ordinance 2018-364 3. Resolution 2018-05 approving findings of fact for the ordinance amendment City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2018-363 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 84 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SIGN ORDINANCE (CITY FILE 17-033) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 84.04, 7. “Dynamic Displays” (Sign Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: 7. Dynamic Displays. Dynamic displays as permitted by section 84.05 (Sign Standards) are subject to the following conditions: a) Only one dynamic display sign shall be allowed per lot. b) Dynamic displays are allowed only on freestanding signs. Dynamic displays may occupy no more than 40%60% of the actual sign area. The remainder of the sign must not have the capability to have dynamic displays even if not used. Only one, contiguous electronic message sign area is allowed on a sign face. c) A dynamic display sign may not change or move more often than once every 12 6 seconds except one for which changes are necessary to correct hour and minute, date, or temperature information. d) The images and messages displayed and transitioned must be instantaneous or fading. Modes of display which cause the message to flash or blink are prohibited. e) Dynamic displays must be designed and equipped to freeze the device in one position if a malfunction occurs. The displays must also be equipped with a means to immediately discontinue the display if it malfunctions, and the sign owner must immediately stop the dynamic display when notified by the city that it is not complying with the standards of this section. f) Electronic message signs must comply with the lighting and brightness standards contained in this section. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of January 2018. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-364 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2017-363 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 17-033) The text of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended to amend Chapter 84 to allow an increase in the display area and to decrease the amount of time between changes in sign copy of dynamic displays A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of January 2018. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-05 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 84 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SIGN ORDINANCE (CITY FILE 17-033) WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to increase the percentage of allowable dynamic signage from 40% to 60% on the sign copy area and decrease the allowable time between change in copy from 12 seconds to six seconds; and WHEREAS, the amendment would allow greater flexibility to communicate messages to the public; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards and City policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Sign Ordinance text amendment, based upon the finding that the proposed amendment would be consistent with State law and the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of January 2018. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Mary Matze through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: January 17, 2018 for the January 25, 2018 City Council meeting RE: Application for site plan and variances for 10705 County Road 116. (PID 02-119- 23-13-0002) (City File 17-035) REVIEW DEADLINE: February 9, 2018 1.Application Request The applicant, Robert H. Brownawell on behalf of Golden Acres Golf Course d.b.a. Pheasant Acres Golf Club, has submitted a request for approval of a site plan and variance to replace and expand two existing accessory storage buildings on site. 2.Planning Commission Review Planning Commission reviewed this item at their regularly scheduled meeting on January 4, 2018. Planning Commissioners unanimously recommended approval of the variance, with a change to condition number 4 to require the Project 2 building match the materials of the adjacent buildings, not the Project 1 building as stated in the staff report. This change was made to correct typo in the staff report. 3.Context Background The applicant is requesting to replace and expand two existing nonconforming accessory storage buildings on site. A permit for the accessory shed on the south was issued in 2012. Zoning and Land Use The Golden Acres Golf Course is guided Low Density Residential and zoned Public Institutional (P-I). Agenda Item 9b. Pheasant Run Site Plan and Variance (city file 17-035) 2 January 25, 2017 Surrounding Properties Property to the east and south is guided Existing Residential and zoned Urban Reserve (UR). Property to the north is guided Low Density Residential and zoned Rural Residential (RR). Property to the west is guided Agricultural and zoned Rural Residential (RR). 4. Ana lysis Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City has limited discretion in approving a site plan is limited to whether or not the plan meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the site plan. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a variance application. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. Site Plan The site plan shows that the location of the two subject accessory buildings are located in the front yard of the property on County Road 116. One building is located on the northern portion of the property, titled “Project 1” (golf equipment shed) on the site plan and the other building is located on the southern edge of the property, titled “Project 2” (soil storage shed) on the site. The applicant’s narrative states that the northern building will be demolished and replaced with a new, slightly larger building and the south building will use the existing foundation and expand the storage shed to the east. Setbacks The accessory buildings comply with the 10-foot minimum setback for rear and side yards. The buildings do both appear to meet the 100-foot setback from County Road 116. Location The proposed building expansions encroach into the front yard of the property. The Zoning Ordinance defines a front yard as “An area extending the full width of a lot between the front lot line and the nearest principal structure.” Section 1030.020, Subd. 3 A. states that no accessory building structure or use shall be allowed in the front yard. Therefore, the applicant has requested a variance from this standard. Pheasant Run Site Plan and Variance (city file 17-035) 3 January 25, 2017 Size The buildings will be expanded to provide additional storage space for soil, tools, and other equipment for the golf course. The golf equipment shed will be expanded from 1,200 sq. ft. to 1,768 sq. ft. (Project 1). The soil storage shed (Project 2) will be expanded from 330 sq. ft. to approximately 682 sq. ft. Section 1030.020, Subd. 4. D. requires a conditional use permit for the construction of more than one detached accessory building with a footprint in excess of 120 sq. ft. However, since these are existing buildings a conditional use permit is not required. Section 1030.020, Subd. 4. F limits the maximum size of accessory buildings to 1,000 sq. ft. or 25% of the rear yard, whichever is less. There are five equipment buildings on this site. After the building additions are constructed, staff estimates that there the total accessory building square footage on site will be 8,975 sq. ft., which is 0.1% of the property’s back yard (staff estimates the back yard of the property to be 5,913,406 sq. ft. or 136-acres). Given the size of the property in relation the total square footage of the building staff finds that the total accessory building square footage is reasonable and consistent with the intent of the ordinance. Building Height Section 1030.020, Subd. 5. C. of the Zoning Ordinance limits the height of accessory buildings in the front yard or side yard to 10 feet, but allows buildings to exceed the height specified in the code with a conditional use permit. Plans submitted by the applicant show that the sidewall building height on the soil shed is 12’ 8” and the wall height on the golf equipment shed is 13’ 3”. Section 1030.010, Subd. 3. C. of the Zoning Ordinance allows administrative approval of expansion of non-conforming only by reason of height, yard setback, or lot coverage area to be permitted administratively, provided that the structural non-conformity is not increased and the expansion complies with the performance standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Typically, a conditional use permit would be required for a building height that exceeds the maximum allowed accessory building height, however, since the buildings are existing non- conforming uses, and the applicant is proposing to increase the footprint of the building staff finds it appropriate to treat this as an expansion of a nonconforming building or structure. Building Standards The applicant’s narrative states that the golf equipment shed (Project 1) will be clad with steel siding and that roofing materials will be similar to nearby buildings. The applicant’s narrative does not specify proposed materials for the soil shed (Project 2). Section 1060.050, Subd. 1. A. 2. of the Zoning Ordinance states that when an expansion of an existing structure is proposed, the existing façade of a building must be upgraded so that 25% or more of the existing structure conforms to the exterior building material requirements of the Section. The Ordinance requires that the improvements be concentrated on the side facing the public road and the side facing an area zoned for residential uses. Pheasant Run Site Plan and Variance (city file 17-035) 4 January 25, 2017 It appears that the requirements of the code are met for the golf equipment shed (Project 1), however, the elevations should be updated to show specifications of materials proposed. It is unclear from the materials submitted by the applicant if plans meet the requirements for the soil shed (Project 2). Final roofing materials for both sheds have not been identified by the applicant. Section 1060.050, Subd.1. D. 3. allows metal siding proposed for accessory buildings to be approved administratively by the Zoning Administrator. Since both buildings are in the front and side yards of the property, the Commission could find that a higher architectural treatment of the accessory buildings would be appropriate. Staff has included a condition that the façade of the Project 2 building must be upgraded to match the materials in on the adjacent shed. The building should be finished with vinyl siding and asphalt shingles to match the existing shed. The Project 1 building is less visible from the public street, and staff has not recommended material upgrades on that building. However, the Commission could find that one of the conditions to mitigate for the variance would be to require an upgraded exterior on this building as well. Staff will work with the applicant prior to issuance of a building permit to ensure that the proposed building materials are consistent with these standards. Section 1060.050, Subd.1. D. 2. requires that accessory buildings provide a roof overhang that extends a minimum of one foot from the exterior wall of the structure. This requirement is not met by the plans submitted for the soil shed (Project 2). It appears that this requirement is met for the golf equipment shed (Project 1), however the roof eave is not dimensioned on the plans submitted. Staff has included a condition that the applicant revise plans to demonstrate compliance with Section 1060.050, Subd.1. D. 2. of the Zoning Ordinance. Landscaping No changes to the existing landscaping is identified by the applicant. However, staff notes that in photos provided by the applicant, there appears to be a mature shrub on the southeast corner of the structure where the expansion is proposed. Staff has included a condition that any trees or shrubs removed must be replaced with a tree or shrub that meets the size requirements of 1060.070, Subd. 2. D. Variance The applicant is requesting a variance to allow accessory structures in a front yard. Section 1030.020, Subd. 3 A. states that no accessory building structure or use shall be allowed in the front yard. While the buildings are currently existing non-conforming structures, the applicant is tearing them down and replacing them with new buildings. Therefore, a variance from this standard is required. Section 1070.040, Subd. 2 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the applicant must demonstrate that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance, that the condition of the variance is unique to the parcel of land and not created by the owner, that the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality, and that the variance will be in harmony the Comprehensive Plan, and the intent and purposes of the Zoning Ordinance. A discussion of each standard follows: Pheasant Run Site Plan and Variance (city file 17-035) 5 January 25, 2017 1. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant indicates that the existing site conditions, including the location of the existing golf course clubhouse and nearby accessory structures limits the ability to move the structure. The question for the City is whether the stated conditions are practical difficulties. The applicant has the burden of proof to show a) that they have a hardship that precludes them from meeting the location requirements of the code and b) the requested variance is the minimum action necessary to alleviate the hardship. Staff finds that the setback variance could be met by moving the structures to an alternative location, however by doing so, they would impact the golf course grounds and landscaping surrounding the clubhouse and the greens. A variance for the shed at this location would have a minimum impact on the golf course grounds and create a better user experience for golf course patrons. 2. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The applicant states that the locations for the sheds are limited by the fully developed golf course green areas, walkways, paths, parking lot and existing locations of the buildings. There is only a few feet of space between the soil shed (Project 2) and there are many mature trees and shrubs on the west side of the golf equipment shed (Project 1). Staff finds that while the conditions upon which the request is based was created by the landowner, expanding the buildings in an alternative location or on the rear side of the buildings is not practical. 3. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Granting the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The accessory buildings have been in this location for many years. The size and landscaping of the golf course minimizes the negative impacts of the structures in the front yard. 4. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The sign ordinance includes location requirements for accessory structures to ensure that visibility is maintained for public safety, space is preserved for future street expansions and drainage and utility easements are not impacted by grading or structures. Staff notes that the proposed building location is outside of the sight visibility triangle and there are no existing drainage and utility easements on site. Furthermore, it is outside of Pheasant Run Site Plan and Variance (city file 17-035) 6 January 25, 2017 the required building setbacks for the P-I District and the buildings are generally screened with existing landscaping. 5. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which anticipates this type of development in the public / semi-public land use categories. Summary Staff finds that the proposed accessory structure expansions are appropriate for the location and use in the district. Given that the size of the structures will be increasing, and that the soil shed is partially visible from County Road 116 and that both sheds are adjacent to residential districts, staff feels that it is appropriate to require a higher level of architecture for the Project 1 building. The Commission could require a higher standard for the second building as well. The Commission should review the ordinance standards and make a recommendation. The draft ordinance includes language for approval of the variance. If the Commission finds that the variance standards have not been met, they should recommend denial of the variance and provide findings of fact for denial. 5. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2018-06 approving site plan and variance as recommended by Planning Commission. Attachments a. Resolution 2018-06 approving site plan and variance b. Aerial Location Map c. Applicant’s Narrative dated November 20, 2017 and December 11, 2017 d. Applicant’s Plans dated November 20, 2017 e. City Engineering Memo dated December 13, 2017 City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - 06 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR GOLDEN ACRES GOLF COURSE FOR AN ACCESSORY BUILDING IN THE FRONT YARD AT 10705 COUNTY ROAD 116 (PID 02- 119-23-13-0002) (CITY FILE 17-035) WHEREAS, Robert H. Brownawell on behalf of Golden Acres Golf Course d.b.a. Pheasant Acres Golf Club is requesting approval of a site plan amendment and variance for property legally described as follows: Lot 8, Block 1 Pheasant Run Golf Club, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the variance a duly called public meeting and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a site plan amendment and variance, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. The variance is approved in accordance with the narrative and plans received by the City on November 20, 2017 and December 11, 2017, as amended by this resolution. 2. A variance to allow replacement and expansion of existing nonconforming accessory buildings in the front yard is granted based on the following findings: 1. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance, because an alternative location would be inefficient for the operations of the golf course. 2. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. This is a unique situation as the golf course has operated for years with the accessory buildings in their current location and that the golf course is fully developed. An alternative location would require the owners of the golf course to alter the design of the putting greens. 3. The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. No change is proposed to the location of the existing buildings. The accessory buildings have been in this location for many years. The size and landscaping of the golf course minimizes the negative impacts of the structures in the front yard. 4. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The proposed building location is outside of the sight visibility triangle and there are no existing drainage and utility easements on site. Furthermore, it is outside of the required building setbacks for the P-I District and the buildings are generally screened with existing landscaping. City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - 06 Page 2 of 2 5. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance to allow the existing location of the accessory buildings is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan vision for the Public Institutional district. 3. Any trees or shrubs removed because of the expansion must be replaced with a tree or shrub that meets the size requirements of 1060.070, Subd. 2. D. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant must: 4. Revise plans to show that the Project 2 building exterior will match the siding and asphalt shingles to match the two adjacent buildings. 5. Provide material details and samples for both buildings to the City for review and approval. 6. Revise plans to show that the roofing complies with the standards of Section 1060.050, Subd. 1. C. and Section 1060.050, Subd.1. D. 2 of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. Record the approving resolution at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 8. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of January 2018. ___________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator He nn e pin Cou n ty P roperty Ma p Da te : 12 /22/2 017 Com men ts: 1 inc h = 1 ,6 00 f ee t PAR C EL ID: 02 119 23 13 000 2 OWN ER N AME : G olde n Acre s Go lf C ou rs e Inc PAR C EL AD DR E SS: 1 070 5 Co R d N o 11 6, Co rcor an MN 553 74 PAR C EL AR EA: 14 7.27 ac res , 6,41 4,928 sq ft A-T-B: Ab stra ct SAL E PR ICE: SAL E D ATA: SAL E C OD E: ASSESS ED 2 016 , PAYABLE 201 7 PR OPERT Y TYPE: Go lf C ou rs e H OM ESTEAD : N on -H ome ste ad M AR KET VA L UE: $1,3 21,00 0 TAX TO TAL: $2 9,47 4.08 ASSESS ED 2 017 , PAYABLE 201 8 PRO PER TY TYPE : G olf C ou rse HO MESTEAD: No n-h ome s te ad MARKE T VALU E: $1 ,3 21 ,0 00 This dat a (i) is fur nished 'A S IS' wi th no repres ent at ion as to com ple ten es s or acc ura cy; (ii) is furnis he d w ith no war rant y of an y k ind; an d (i ii) is not su itab le for lega l, engi neering or s urv ey ing purpo ses. Hen nepin C ounty s hall not be liable f or a ny dam age, in jury o r los s r esu lting f rom this dat a. CO PYRIG HT © HEN N EPIN CO UN TY 2 0 17 Engineer’s Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - To: Kendra Lindahl, City Planner From: Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Date: December 13, 2017 Subject: Shed Construction Background • Engineering and Public Works have no issues with the additional shed construction for the Pheasant Acres 2018 project. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform D ATE: January 16, 2018 for the January 25, 2018 City Council Meeting RE: Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat for “Bass Lake Estates” a mixed-use development at 19219 and 19235 County Road 10 (PID 25-119-23-44-0002 and 25- 119-23-44-0003) (City File 17-036) 60-Day Review Ends:February 6, 2018 1.Application Request E & R Investments, LLC has submitted a request for a Final Plat and Final PUD Development Plan for “Bass Lake Estates” a development of 56 homes and 7 self-storage buildings on 39.98 acres. The Council has agreed to modify the development agreement financial guarantee requirements for this project and staff is working with the City Attorney to create a new development agreement contract to reflect these desired changes. This will be brought back to the Council for approval at the February 22nd meeting. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their January 4th meeting. Other than the development team members, there was no one present to speak on this item. The Planning Commission asked where snow storage would occur on the self-storage site. The plans do not identify a location, but it is included as a condition of approval. The Planning Commission discussed the desire to have additional screening between the residential homes and Lions Park. The preliminary plat approval included a condition that the developer provide more screening, but additional landscaping is not possible due to the drainage and utility easement in that location. The Commission discussed other alternatives. John Rask from MI Homes indicated that they would work with staff to develop additional screening, possibly adding board fencing strategically on the chain link fence. This was added as condition of approval. The Planning Commission discussed the request for flexibility from the garage design standards and asked how they differed from what was approved on Bass Lake Crossing. Staff noted that the projects have different lot sizes and home products, so the requested flexibility is different: Agenda Item: 9c. Bass Lake Estates PUD Final Plan and Final Plat (17-036) 2 January 25, 2018 Approved Language for Bass Lake Crossing Proposed Language for Bass Lake Estates 1. All Design Requirements for the RSF-3 district described in Section 1040.050 shall be met, except that PUD flexibility shall be provided to allow with 3-car garages to exceed more than 55 percent of the viewable ground floor street-facing linear building frontage, based on the following conditions: a. Not more than 33% of the homes in the development shall have garages that exceed the standard. b. There shall be no more than three homes contiguous to each other that exceed the 55% requirement. c. The garages shall not be more than 62% of the front elevation. d. Three car garages shall be prohibited on the 50-foot wide lots. e. The third stall garage must be offset two feet from the main portion of the garage to provide visual relief. B. Garages: 1. The garage shall not comprise more than 55 percent of the viewable ground floor street-facing linear building frontage for at least 30% of the homes. This standard is based on the measurement of the entire garage structure and not on a measurement of the garage door or doors only. Corner lots are exempt from this requirement on one street elevation. 2. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior design of the home. 3. Three car garages shall be prohibited on 40- and 50-foot wide lots. 4. When allowed, the third stall garage must be offset two feet from the main portion of the garage to provide visual relief. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the PUD final plan with the addition of the condition requiring additional screening from Lions Park. 3. Context Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a final PUD development plan is limited to whether or not the proposed plan is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary PUD development plan. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final PUD development plan. The City’s discretion in approving a final plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance and the conditions of preliminary plat approval. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat. Bass Lake Estates PUD Final Plan and Final Plat (17-036) 3 January 25, 2018 Background City Council reviewed a sketch plan of the development on June 22, 2017. The Council identified several concerns that they asked the applicant to address, but was generally supportive of the concept. The Council approved the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Preliminary PUD on October 26, 2017. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment was reviewed by the Metropolitan Council and found to be consistent with the regional policy. The City Council reviewed a request from the applicant to modify the letter of credit requirements in the Development Agreement. The Council discussed the request at their December 28th and January 11th meetings and agreed to allow a combination of a performance bond and cash as the development agreement financial guarantee. Staff will bring the development agreement back to the Council for approval on February 22nd. 4. Analysis of Request Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the approved preliminary plans, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report and the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo. Final PUD Development Plan The PUD offers enhanced flexibility to develop the site through the relaxation of most typical zoning district standards. The PUD allows for a greater variety of land uses, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this flexibility, the City expects a higher level of design and a more sensitive development than might normally be the case. The final PUD development plan must be reviewed for compliance with the preliminary PUD approvals. Staff finds that the final PUD development plan is generally consistent with the approved preliminary plans. The plans have been modified from the preliminary plans to eliminate one of the outlots by moving the pond from the south side of the self -storage to the south side of the new lots. Architecture The preliminary PUD approvals required the applicant to prepare HOA documents for review and approval by the City Attorney. The document has been submitted and is under review. The HOA will be responsible for maintenance of the common areas (outlots) as well as retaining walls, fences, mailbox areas, landscaping, wetland buffers, etc. The HOA will also plow the public sidewalks. The applicant submitted a series of house plans and color palettes for the project with the preliminary PUD development plan (some examples are attached and the full set is available at City Hall). Each house plan will be reviewed by the City prior to building permit to ensure that the ordinance standards as modified by the PUD are met. However, because this development will be constructed over a period of time, we expect that new or modified house plans will be added to the product line and would be administratively reviewed and approved by the City. Bass Lake Estates PUD Final Plan and Final Plat (17-036) 4 January 25, 2018 The submitted plans comply with the PUD approvals with one exception. While the homes are well designed, they require PUD flexibility from some Design Requirements as listed in 1040.040, Subd 8. of the Zoning Ordinance. Specifically, B. Garages: 5. The garage shall not comprise more than 55 percent of the viewable ground floor street-facing linear building frontage for at least 30% of the homes. This standard is based on the measurement of the entire garage structure and not on a measurement of the garage door or doors only. Corner lots are exempt from this requirement on one street elevation. 6. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior design of the home. 7. Three car garages shall be prohibited on 40- and 50-foot wide lots. 8. When allowed, the third stall garage must be offset two feet from the main portion of the garage to provide visual relief. They shall be required to comply with all other design standards for the residential portion of the project. The industrial portion of the project is unchanged from the self-storage buildings reviewed with the preliminary plans. PUD flexibility was granted to allow metal buildings in the interior of the site. Lot Standards The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility for lot area, lot width, front, side and rear setbacks, and distance between buildings. The following table shows the lot dimensions required in the RSF-3 District and the lot dimensions proposed in the PUD. Single Family Industrial Minimum Lot Area 5,103 square feet 1 acre Minimum lot width 40 feet 100 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From CR 10 N/A 60 feet Front, From all other streets 20 feet NA Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 15 feet N/A Side 5 feet 20 feet Rear 25 feet 20 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 45 feet Parking setback from CR 10 NA 50 feet Drive Aisle setback from CR 10 NA 37.2 feet Bass Lake Estates PUD Final Plan and Final Plat (17-036) 5 January 25, 2018 All homes must have a minimum 22-foot long parking area between the garage and the public street/public easement. It appears that a few of the units are short of this, but staff will review with the building permit to ensure compliance with the building permit. Trails and Sidewalks The plans show a sidewalk on the east side of Fir Street and south side of 72nd Avenue. The City Council approved sidewalks on only one side of the street with the previous plan review. The plans show the sidewalk ending before the cul de sac bulb and staff has included a condition requiring the sidewalk to extend to the cul de sac bulb (It is shown correctly on some plan sheets and not others). The sidewalk would be extended to the property line when the street is extended and the cul de sac is removed. Streets The street alignment has been modified slightly to accommodate the change in the pond location. Off-Site Public Improvements There are off-site improvements to streets and utilities that will be funded by the developer and constructed by the City on County Road 10. These improvements are planned to be designed over the winter for bidding and construction in 2018. This work is one of the benefits to the PUD. The developer will also be connecting to the sewer and water off-site and is obtaining easements from the adjacent landowner (Lions Park) for this work. Landscaping The preliminary approvals included a condition that the developer work with the City to look for ways to add more landscaping between the homes on Lot 24, Block 2 and Lot 14, Block 3. However, the drainage swale in this location makes additional planting difficult. Staff is concerned about the location of the single tree located on each lot as we need to ensure it does not prohibit maintenance vehicles from accessing the swale. The developer is planning to replace the chain link fence with a new chain link fence along the shared property line. A board fence or vines planted to cover the chain link fence could provide some screening without conflicting with the drainage swale. Staff encourages the developer to consider these alternatives. The Planning Commission may wish to comment. The plans also show conflicts between the drainage swale and landscaping between the homes in Block 2 and the self -storage buildings. The applicant has not yet received approval of their plans from Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission and that review may result in changes to the stormwater management plan. The City Engineer’s memo includes a condition to address this issue. Staff has also included a condition that the developer work with the City to locate the trees outside of the drainage easements Bass Lake Estates PUD Final Plan and Final Plat (17-036) 6 January 25, 2018 and ensure needed access is maintained. The final plan will be approved prior to construction and the applicant will work with the City to field locate trees as needed. Development Phasing The developer plans to develop this project in 2 phases. The developer would like to begin work on the residential portion of the project next year and that construction will continue for 2-4 years. The applicant is asking for the ability to delay construction of the self-storage portion of the site until 2022 (after the residential portion is completed). The Council can extend the approvals to allow this, and staff notes it is not unusual to see a 4-5 year build-out on a project like this. Staff has included this extension in the draft resolution approving the PUD final plan. Final Plat The applicant is requesting approval of a final plat to create 57 lots and 2 outlots. The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. There have been modifications to the road and pond locations, but the total number of units and the development location is consistent with the preliminary approvals. Conclusion Staff has reviewed the plan for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the preliminary approvals, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. The staff report noted the outstanding issues that must be addressed and we have included conditions in the attached resolutions to address these issues. 5. Recommendation Move to adopt the following: a. Resolution 2018-17 Approving the Final PUD Development Plan b. Resolution 2018-18 Approving the Final Plat Attachments a. Resolution 2018-17 approving the final PUD development plan b. Resolution 2018-18 approving the final plat c. Location Map d. Engineer’s Memo dated January 5, 2018 e. Applicant’s Narrative dated November 21, 2017 f. Approved Preliminary Plan dated August 15, 2017 g. Development Plans dated December 21, 2017 h. Final Plat Graphics dated December 21, 2017 i. Sample Elevations for Homes (full set available at city hall) City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-17 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR “BASS LAKE ESTATES” FOR E & R INVESTMENTS, LLC ON THE 39.98-ACRE SITE AT 19219 AND 19235 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 25-119-23-44-0002 AND 25-119-23-44-0003) (CITY FILE 17-036) WHEREAS, E&R Investments LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a final PUD (planned unit development) plan for “Bass Lake Estates” on property legally described as: Parcel 1: That part of the West Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 25, Township 119, Range 23, lying South of the centerline of County Road 10, except the West 300 feet thereof. Parcel 2: The West 300 feet of the West Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 25, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, lying South of the centerline of County Road 10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a final PUD development plan and, FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to release of the final plat for recording with the County: 1. A final PUD development plan is approved to create for 56 single family lots, one industrial lot and two outlots for Bass Lake Crossing, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on November 21, 2017 and revision received on November 22nd, December 8th and December 21st, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the final plat. 3. The land use map amendment approved by Resolution 2017-70 and the rezoning approved by Ordinance No. 2017-359 on October 26, 2017 shall take effect upon adoption of this resolution adopting the final PUD development plan. 4. The development contract must be executed by the developer and the City and must be filed with the final plat. 5. Development is subject to the preliminary approvals in Resolutions 2017-72 and 2017- 73. 6. The developer shall comply with all conditions of final plat approval (Resolution 2017- 18). City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-17 Page 2 of 5 7. Park dedication shall be as follows: a. Dedication of the 20-foot trail easement from Fir Lane to the west property line and dedication of the 10-foot trail easement along the west property line. b. The plans shall be revised to show an 8-foot bituminous trail between County Road 10 and the private drive. c. The 8-foot wide trail from County Road 10 to the west property line shall be constructed by the developer. d. In exchange for PUD flexibility, the developer is required to provide finished grading, paving and ground cover for this trail. No credit toward the required dedication shall be given for this work. e. Park dedication shall be cash in lieu of land in the amount of $222,320.00 (56 new lots x $3,970.00 per lot) for the residential portion. Park dedication shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat. f. The industrial portion shall be $20,325 of the market value of the land. (5.42 x $125,000 x 3%) and shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat. 8. The sidewalk shall be extended to the cul de sac bulb. The sidewalk shall be extended to the property line when the road is extended to the adjacent property and the temporary cul de sac is removed. The HOA shall be responsible for these costs. 9. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo, dated January 5, 2018. 10. All platted residential lots shall comply with the following: Single Family Industrial Minimum Lot Area 5,103 square feet 1 acre Minimum lot width 40 feet 100 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From CR 10 N/A 60 feet Front, From all other streets 20 feet NA Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 15 feet N/A Side 5 feet 20 feet Rear 25 feet 20 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 45 feet Parking setback from CR 10 NA 50 feet Drive Aisle setback from CR 10 NA 37.2 feet 11. Mechanical equipment (including air conditioning units) must be located in the side or rear yard. 12. All garages must have a minimum 22-foot parking area in front of the garage that does not overlap into sidewalks, drives or streets. City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-17 Page 3 of 5 13. All Design Requirements for the RSF-3 district described in Section 1040.050 shall be met for the residential homes, except that the following flexibility for garages shall be allowed: B. Garages: 1. The garage shall not comprise more than 55 percent of the viewable ground floor street-facing linear building frontage for at least 30% of the homes. This standard is based on the measurement of the entire garage structure and not on a measurement of the garage door or doors only. Corner lots are exempt from this requirement on one street elevation. 2. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior design of the home. 3. Three Car Garages shall be prohibited on 40- and 50-foot wide lots. 4. When allowed, the third stall garage must be offset two feet from the main portion of the garage to provide visual relief. 14. PUD flexibility is granted to allow certain industrial building elevations to exceed the 20% metal siding requirements for internal elevations. 15. The developer shall provide centralized mailbox locations. A mailbox plan shall be submitted for City review and approval. 16. The landscape plan shall be revised in accordance with Landform comments dated December 21, 2017. a. The wetland buffer planting shall be a native seed mix appropriate to the design condition and meeting the intent of cover and diversity as outlined in the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources State Seed Mixes and shall be submitted for review and approval by the City. b. The wetland buffer is shown on the plans, but the wetland buffer setback must be added to the plans. 17. The landscape plan shall be revised to eliminate conflicts between the proposed landscaping and the drainage easements. Staff has concern about the drainage swales/landscaping between the Lot 1 and homes in Block 2 and the area adjacent to Lions Park. The applicant shall work with staff to revise the landscape plan. 18. The applicant shall work with staff and revise the plans to provide permanent screening between Lions Park and Lot 24, Block 2 and Lot 14, Block 3. If the screening is provided by adding board fencing or similar materials to the chain link fence on the common lot line, a maintenance agreement must be provided for review and approval by the City. 19. Lawn Sprinklers/irrigation systems shall have rain sensors to limit unnecessary watering. 20. A final tree preservation plan must be submitted. City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-17 Page 4 of 5 21. Snow storage areas must be shown for Lot 1, Block 2. Revised plans must be submitted for City review and approval. 22. Fence details shall be provided for City review and approval. 23. Street Light details shall be submitted for review and approval by the City. 24. The applicant must work with the City to apply for a FEMA map amendment. The plans show grading in the mapped floodplain and floodplain on Lots 1 and 3-6, Block 3. The floodplain will be removed from Lots 3-6 if the map amendment is approved. Potential buyers should be notified of this process. 25. The emergency vehicle access in the northeast corner of the site must be added to all plan sheets. a. It appears that the access conflicts with trees proposed for planting. b. The access must be designed to pass a roll test. The access may be grass, but must be maintained for access, including snow removal, etc. If a gate/bollard is to be installed, it must be equipped with a breakaway. c. Details for the emergency access must be provided. 26. The following documents must be approved by the City Attorney and recorded at Hennepin County. The responsible party shall be the applicant (E&R Investments, LLC) and their assigns: a. HOA documents b. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement c. Trail Easement (for both city trail and county trail) d. Temporary Turnaround Easement e. Access, Utility and Drainage easement for work on Lions Park property FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: 1. The applicant must record the approving resolutions and associated documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 2. The applicant shall provide proof of recording the final plat and related documents at Hennepin County. 3. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plan drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. 4. The approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has initiated construction. The approvals anticipate a 4-5 year build out. City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-17 Page 5 of 5 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of January 2018. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-18 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR “BASS LAKE ESTATES” FOR E & R INVESTMENTS, LLC ON THE 39.98-ACRE SITE AT 19219 AND 19235 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 25-119-23-44- 0002 AND 25-119-23-44-0003) (CITY FILE 17-036) WHEREAS, E&R Investments LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a Final Plat for “Bass Lake Estates” on property legally described as: Parcel 1: That part of the West Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 25, Township 119, Range 23, lying South of the centerline of County Road 10, except the West 300 feet thereof. Parcel 2: The West 300 feet of the West Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 25, Township 119 North, Range 23 West, lying South of the centerline of County Road 10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by E&R Investments, LLC for a final plat for Bass Lake Estates and, FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to release of the final plat for recording with the County: 1. A final PUD development plan is approved to create for 56 single family lots, one industrial lot and two outlots for Bass Lake Crossing, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on November 21, 2017 and revision received on November 22nd, December 8th and December 21st, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the final PUD development plan. 3. The applicant must comply with the conditions in Resolution 2018-17. 4. The development agreement must be approved by the City Council. 5. The extension of sanitary sewer and municipal water is required to serve this site. Approval of this final plat is contingent upon extension of these services to the site. 6. Park dedication for shall be as required by Resolution 2018-17 and shall be due prior to release of the final plat for recording. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: City of Corcoran January 25, 2018 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2018-18 Page 2 of 2 1. All drainage and utility easements shall be staked, surveyed and properly recorded prior to beginning any work on site. 2. The applicant must file the final plat for phase I at Hennepin County within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. 3. The development agreement must be executed by the applicant and the City and must be filed with the final plat. 4. Record the approving resolutions and associated documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 5. The applicant shall provide proof of recording the final plat and related documents at Hennepin County. 6. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plat drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. 7. Wetland buffer monument signs must be purchased from the city and installed as shown on the plans. 8. The application is subject to review, approval and permitting from Hennepin County. 9. The application is subject to review, approval and permitting from Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to release of remaining escrow: 1. Lot corner monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. As part of the development contract financial guarantee shall be required to ensure installation per city requirements. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Thomas, Ron Thomas, Ron Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Dejewski, Brian Dejewski, Brian Keefe, Mike Keefe, Mike LaFave, Tonya LaFave, Tonya Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 25th day of January 2018. ________________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator Date: 6/15/2017 Hennepin County Natural Resources Map Legend Streams FEMA Floodplains - 100Year A AE FLOODPLAIN AH AO AE FLOODWAY Wetlands Potential Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - NWI Comments:¯PID: 2511923440002 Address: 19235 CO RD NO 10, CORCORAN Owner Name: PURDY PROPERTIES LLC Acres: 17.74 1 inch = 800 feet This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 Engineer’s Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. | 1800 Pioneer Creek Center | P.O. Box 249 | Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com - To: Kendra Lindahl, City Planner, Kevin Mattson, PE, Director of Public Works From: Kent Torve, P.E. Date: December 20, 2017 Subject: Bass Lake Estates Infrastructure Review 0.0 Infrastructure Setting The proposed development consists of residential and self-storage on the south side of CR 10 directly across from Bass Lake Crossing (MI Homes) near the Larkin Road “Y” intersection. The development is consistent with trunk infrastructure plans and is within the area serviced by existing sewer and water trunk lines. • Plans dated 12/8/17 were reviewed for stormwater, sewer and water. • Additional plan review will occur as the project moves through the approval process towards construction • Detail plates to be updated to most recent City standards • Provide written responses. 1.0 Transportation The development is planned to move forward in 2018 along with Bass Lake Crossings, which is north of CR 10. The Development Agreement will layout financial commitments for each development. Plan Comment • Street radius at CR 10 to be 30’ • Sidewalk north of private drive along west side of Fir Lane to be 8’ bituminous trail. Ped ramp to be installed to cross perpendicular to Fir Lane to proposed trail • Show details of individual pedestrian ramps for sidewalks and trails to determine ADA compliance • Verify street intersection lines up with City designed turn lanes. Submit CAD files to allow city to verify. • Temporary easement required around temporary cul-de-sacs. • Install B6 curb along the end of the road at Lion’s Park property line to keep water on this property. 2.0 Sewer The parcel can be serviced by the trunk gravity and Lions Park lift station installed in 2014, which will eventually be piped to the MCES lift station located on the Schommer parcel to the northeast. MCES is moving forward with a 2018 operational timeline. Offsite • Final alignment will be contingent on sewer slope and suitable soils. Submit test pit information when available. Plan Comment • Pipe over 16-foot depth shall be SD-26 • Pipe over 26-foot depth shall be C-900 • Install manhole at golf course property line instead of cleanout. Temporary easement may be needed from golf course to install manhole • Install watertight manhole castings on SMH 1 and SMH 5 • Update sewer invert at SMH 1 • Drop manholes to be lined (see City detail) • Callout wye stationing, invert elevations and riser depths (if necessary) on all sanitary services • Show easements, proposed contours, and wetland delineation on offsite sanitary sewer sheets 3.0 Water Plan Comments • Sewer and water services should be stubbed nine (9) feet beyond the property line, within the drainage and utility easement (see City detail). • Move gate valve near golf course to be 20’ East of new manhole to be installed. • Update offsite watermain alignment to follow proposed easement alignment • Wet tap to be perpendicular to watermain • Update insulation to be at storm crossing, show insulation for storm crossing at lot 6 and lot 7 block 3. • Hydrants to be installed at high points in watermain. • Hydrant at approximate station 1+40 on Fir Lane to be moved to approximate station 0+25. Adjust spacing as necessary. • Curb stop box elevation to be called out. • Hydrant spacing to be reviewed by fire departments 4.0 Grading and Stormwater The area drains to the large wetland to the south and a watershed permit will be required in addition to City requirements. Grading • Provide the watershed report and comments for City review. • Minimum 3’ cover depth on storm sewer pipe from CBMH 18 to STMH 19 • Minimum cover depth on all storm sewer pipe to be 3’ • Low openings on all buildings to be 2’ above EOFs and HWLs • All slopes to be mowable, or a retaining wall will be required • Grade berm at end of street at Lion’s Park • Grade berm along Lion’s Park property line at rear yard storm sewer to prevent run on to Lions Park. Stormwater • Review of the modeling and watershed submittal will be performed. • Show pond information (name HWL,NWL,BOT) on street/storm sheet • The storm manhole immediately upstream from ponds shall have 3-foot sumps. (CBMH 18, CBMH 9) • City Standard Plate shows a sump collection pipe for those properties that don’t have access directly to a pond or wetland. Additional storm sewer structures may be required to connect draintile to storm sewer system. (Lots 1-19 Block 1, Lots 2-24 Block 2) • Show profile from CBMH 9 to FES • Label HWL and NWL of wetlands • Label street crossing EOFs • Verify minimum 15-foot access routes for all general maintenance requirements to and around all ponds, utilities, etc. • FES 10 and FES 20 to be installed at NWL • Show details of outlet control structure STMH 31 • Shift CBMH 16A to property line at lot 21 and lot 20 block 2 and CBMH 16 to lot 11 and lot 12 block 3 to prevent storm pipe from being under sidewalk • Storm sewer with CBs and flat swales in rear yards is susceptible to wet conditions. Therefore install a draintile with sock 12-inches below grade (above the RCP) and core the tile into CBs or CBMH. • Note: City’s requirement to not plant landscaping over drainage or city utilities whenever possible o Revise the drainage swale and landscaping between Block 2 and the storage facility. Shift rear yard drainage swale centerline to the 1/3 portion of the drainage and utility easement which is closer to residential structures. o Shift all landscaping to the 1/3 section of drainage and utility easement closer to storage facilities. During construction avoid placing landscaping over infrastructure and within drainage areas and EOF’s. 5.0 Construction Plan Review • Updated City Standard Detail plates will be provided • Show curb draintile and cleanouts on plan view (shown on City detail plates also) • Provide a list of permits required o Contractor to obtain all city and government permits prior to demolition of structures, abandonment of wells and demolition of septic tanks. • Storage site to have separate domestic and fire protection water lines in buildings that require both • Landscaping to be reviewed with city engineer before placement of any trees to avoid utility conflicts T: \ 2 2 9 4 - C o r c o r a n \ C o r c o r a n l o g o . j p g T: \ 2 2 9 4 - C o r c o r a n \ C o r c o r a n l o g o . j p g DTDT DT DT X X X X X X X X XXXXXSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF DT DT DTDTDTDT X X X SF SF SF SF SF SF S F S F SFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF DT DT X X XXXXXXXXXX SF SF SF SF SF SF S F SF SF SF SF SF SF S F S F S F S F S F S F S F N N N N N N XX X X - X X - X X XX X X - X X - X X XX X X - X X - X X XX X X - X X - X X XX X XX - X X - X X XX XX XX XX X X ** E N T E R G E N E R A L N O T E S H E R E FI N A L R E D L I N E S P. C . C H A N G E S LA S T R E V I S E D FI N A L P R E P DE C . C H A N G E S DA T E : DR A W N B Y : BU Y E R : AD D I T I O N : BL O C K : LO T : JO B # : GE N E R A L N O T E S : TH E S E A R C H I T E C T U R A L P L A N S A N D TH E C O N S T R U C T E D P U R S U A N T T O TH E P L A N S A R E T H E E X C L U S I V E CO P Y R I G H T E D P R O P E R T Y O F M/ I H O M E S AN D A R E P R O T E C T E D B Y U N I T E D ST A T E S C O P Y R I G H T L A W . A N Y UN A U T H O R I Z E D U S E O F T H E S E PL A N S I S S T R I C T L Y P R O H I B I T E D . CO P Y R I G H T FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x24") +9" THE FIRST COURSE OF BRICK. SHOULD BE HELD 6" BELOW THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION. THE FINAL GRADE SHOULD NOT BE STALL GARAGES, DRIVEWAY TO BE CUT BACK TO 20' AT THE CURB LINE. SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" (18"x24") REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x24") SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x24") NEWPORT ELEVATION A-STONE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX-XX-XX 2016 WINGATE "A" XX XX XX XXXX FINAL REDLINES P.C. CHANGES LAST REVISED FINAL PREP DEC. CHANGES DATE: DRAWN BY: BUYER: ADDITION: BLOCK: LOT: JOB#:GENERAL NOTES: THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PLANS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF M/I HOMES AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. COPYRIGHT TH E F I R S T C O U R S E O F B R I C K . SH O U L D B E H E L D 6 " B E L O W T H E T O P O F T H E FO U N D A T I O N . T H E F I N A L G R A D E S H O U L D N O T B E ST A L L G A R A G E S , D R I V E W A Y T O B E C U T B A C K P E R SU R V E Y A T T H E C U R B L I N E . SI D E E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) REAR ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x24")SIDE ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x24") 3- P I E C E F R I E Z E D E T A I L SC A L E : 1 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) FR O N T E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) WI N G A T E E L E V A T I O N A - S T O N E EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S XXXX XXXX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX-XX-XX XX XX XX **ENTER GENERAL NOTES HERE FINAL REDLINES P.C. CHANGES LAST REVISED FINAL PREP DEC. CHANGES DATE: DRAWN BY: BUYER: ADDITION: BLOCK: LOT: JOB#:PA G E 5354 PARKDALE DRIVE #100, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 GENERAL NOTES: THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PLANS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF M/I HOMES AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. COPYRIGHT FR O N T E L E V A T I O N +8 " OP T . W I N D O W S SIDE E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) OP T . W I N D O W S OPT. WINDOWS OP T . W I N D O W SI D E E L E V A T I O N RE A R E L E V A T I O N +9 " TH E F I R S T C O U R S E O F B R I C K . NO T E : H O M E O W N E R / L A N D S C A P E R - TO P R E V E N T M O I S T U R E P R O B L E M S , F I N A L G R A D E SH O U L D B E H E L D 6 " B E L O W T H E T O P O F T H E FO U N D A T I O N . T H E F I N A L G R A D E S H O U L D N O T B E PU S H E D U P M O R E T H A N 2 " A B O V E T H E B O T T O M O F HH H R E Q U I R E S A T A P E R E D D R I V E W A Y O N A L L 3 R D ST A L L G A R A G E S , D R I V E W A Y T O B E C U T B A C K P E R SU R V E Y A T T H E C U R B L I N E . XX X X SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) SC A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) AS - 1 EL M W O O D I V E L E V A T I O N A - S T O N E EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S A A A B C 1 2 3 4 5 2016 ELMWOOD IV XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XXXX XX-XX-XX 2016 CEDARWOOD "A" XX XX XX XXXX FINAL REDLINES P.C. CHANGES LAST REVISED FINAL PREP DEC. CHANGES DATE: DRAWN BY: BUYER: ADDITION: BLOCK: LOT: JOB#:PA G E 5354 PARKDALE DRIVE #100, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 GENERAL NOTES: THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PLANS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF M/I HOMES AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. COPYRIGHT * 6/12 & 12/12 ROOF PITCH W/ 12" O.H. TYP. WHERE NOTED * 24" HEEL HEIGHT @ HOUSE (12/12 PITCH) * CAULK & FLASH ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS * CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT * ADDITION ROOF HATS TO REAR IF NEEDED SI D E E L E V A T I O N REAR ELEVATION SIDE ELE V A T I O N FR O N T E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) SCALE: 1/8"= 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x24") SC A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) OPT. WINDOWS OP T . W I N D O W S OP T . W I N D O W S OP T . W I N D O W S XX X X TH E F I R S T C O U R S E O F B R I C K . NO T E : H O M E O W N E R / L A N D S C A P E R - TO P R E V E N T M O I S T U R E P R O B L E M S , F I N A L G R A D E SH O U L D B E H E L D 6 " B E L O W T H E T O P O F T H E FO U N D A T I O N . T H E F I N A L G R A D E S H O U L D N O T B E PU S H E D U P M O R E T H A N 2 " A B O V E T H E B O T T O M O F HH H R E Q U I R E S A T A P E R E D D R I V E W A Y O N A L L 3 R D ST A L L G A R A G E S , D R I V E W A Y T O B E C U T B A C K P E R SU R V E Y A T T H E C U R B L I N E . AS - 1 CE D A R W O O D E L E V A T I O N A - S T O N E EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S A A A 1 3 2 4 XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX-XX-XX 2016 LINDEN "A" XX XX XX XXXX FINAL REDLINES P.C. CHANGES LAST REVISED FINAL PREP DEC. CHANGES DATE: DRAWN BY: BUYER: ADDITION: BLOCK: LOT: JOB#:GENERAL NOTES: THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PLANS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF M/I HOMES AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. COPYRIGHT * 6/12 & 12/12 ROOF PITCH W/ 12" O.H. TYP. WHERE NOTED * 24" HEEL HEIGHT @ HOUSE (12/12 PITCH) * CAULK & FLASH ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS * CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT * ADDITION ROOF HATS TO REAR IF NEEDED TH E F I R S T C O U R S E O F B R I C K . SH O U L D B E H E L D 6 " B E L O W T H E T O P O F T H E FO U N D A T I O N . T H E F I N A L G R A D E S H O U L D N O T B E ST A L L G A R A G E S , D R I V E W A Y T O B E C U T B A C K P E R SU R V E Y A T T H E C U R B L I N E . FR O N T E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 ) SI D E E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 ) REAR ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x24) SI D E E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 ) LI N D E N E L E V A T I O N A - S T O N E EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XXXX XX-XX-XX 2016 LANGFORD "B" XX XX XX XXXX FINAL REDLINES P.C. CHANGES LAST REVISED FINAL PREP DEC. CHANGES DATE: DRAWN BY: BUYER: ADDITION: BLOCK: LOT: JOB#:PA G E 5354 PARKDALE DRIVE #100, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 GENERAL NOTES: THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PLANS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF M/I HOMES AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. COPYRIGHT RE A R E L E V A T I O N * 6/12 & 8/12 ROOF PITCH W/ 18" O.H. TYP. WHERE NOTED * HEEL HEIGHT AT THE HOUSE AS NOTED * HEEL HEIGHT AT THE GARAGE AS NOTED * CAULK & FLASH ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS * CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT * ADDITION ROOF HATS TO REAR IF NEEDED THE FIRST COURSE OF BRICK.NOTE: HOME OWNER / LAND S C A P E R - TO PREVENT MOISTURE PROBLEMS, FIN A L G R A D E SHOULD BE HELD 6" BELOW THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION. THE FINAL GRADE SHOULD NO T B E PUSHED UP MORE THAN 2" ABOVE THE B O T T O M O F HHH REQUIRES A TAPERED DRIVEWAY O N A L L 3 R D STALL GARAGES, DRIVEWAY TO BE CUT BACK P E R SURVEY AT THE CURB LINE.SIDE ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x24") FR O N T E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) SI D E E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) XX X X OP T . W I N D O W OP T . W I N D O W OP T . W I N D O W BS - 1 LA N G F O R D E L E V A T I O N B - S T O N E EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S A A A 7 8 9 10 1 2 56 34 XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX-XX-XX XX XX XX XXXX FINAL REDLINES P.C. CHANGES LAST REVISED FINAL PREP DEC. CHANGES DATE: DRAWN BY: BUYER: ADDITION: BLOCK: LOT: JOB#:GENERAL NOTES: THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PLANS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF M/I HOMES AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. COPYRIGHT CO L O R S E L E C T I O N S THE FIRST COURSE OF BRICK.SHOULD BE HELD 6" BELOW THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION. THE FINAL GRADE SHOULD NOT BESTALL GARAGES, DRIVEWAY TO BE CUT BACK PERSURVEY AT THE CURB LINE.SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x24")REAR ELEVATION SI D E E L E V A T I O N SI D E E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 ) SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 ) FR O N T E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 ) XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX-XX-XX GRAYSTONE "B" XX XX XX XXXX FINAL REDLINES P.C. CHANGES LAST REVISED FINAL PREP DEC. CHANGES DATE: DRAWN BY: BUYER: ADDITION: BLOCK: LOT: JOB#:GENERAL NOTES: THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PLANS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF M/I HOMES AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. COPYRIGHT SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) SI D E E L E V A T I O N SI D E E L E V A T I O N FR O N T E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) * 6/12, & 8/12 ROOF PITCH W/ 12" O.H. TYP. WHERE NOTED * CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT * ADDITION ROOF HATS TO REAR IF NEEDED * CAULK & FLASH ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS * 13 1/2" HEEL RISE @ THE GARAGE (8/12 PITCH) * 11 1/2" HEEL RISE @ THE HOUSE (6/12 PITCH) SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) REAR ELEVAT I O N SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x2 4 " ) TH E F I R S T C O U R S E O F B R I C K . SH O U L D B E H E L D 6 " B E L O W T H E T O P O F T H E FO U N D A T I O N . T H E F I N A L G R A D E S H O U L D N O T B E ST A L L G A R A G E S , D R I V E W A Y T O B E C U T B A C K P E R TH E S U R V E Y A T T H E C U R B L I N E . XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX XX-XX-XX XX-XX-XX 2016 KAIDEN "B" XX XX XX XXXX FINAL REDLINES P.C. CHANGES LAST REVISED FINAL PREP DEC. CHANGES DATE: DRAWN BY: BUYER: ADDITION: BLOCK: LOT: JOB#:GENERAL NOTES: THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PLANS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF M/I HOMES AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. COPYRIGHT * 6/12 & 10/12 ROOF PITCH W/ 12" & 18" O.H. TYP. WHERE NOTED * HEEL HEIGHT AT THE HOUSE AS NOTED * HEEL HEIGHT AT THE GARAGE AS NOTED * CAULK & FLASH ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS * CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT * ADDITION ROOF HATS TO REAR IF NEEDED REAR ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" (18"x24") SI D E E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) SI D E E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) FR O N T E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 8 " x 2 4 " ) TH E F I R S T C O U R S E O F B R I C K . SH O U L D B E H E L D 6 " B E L O W T H E T O P O F T H E FO U N D A T I O N . T H E F I N A L G R A D E S H O U L D N O T B E ST A L L G A R A G E S , D R I V E W A Y T O B E C U T B A C K P E R SU R V E Y A T T H E C U R B L I N E . Plans and specifications are constantly changed to better serve our customers. Final plans and specifications will determine dimensions, elevations and products used. All plans are copyrighted by M/I Homes. Residential Building Contractor Number: BC701438 The Newport Elevation E Stone Elevation A Stone Elevation B Stone Elevation C Stone T h e N e w p o r t Fi r s t F l o o r S e c o n d F l o o r Tw o S t o r y • 3 B e d r o o m s • 2 . 5 B a t h s • 3 - C a r G a r a g e 2 , 3 3 6 - 3 , 3 8 0 F i n i s h e d s f Pl a n s a n d s p e c i f i c a t i o n s a r e c o n s t a n t l y c h a n g e d t o b e t t e r s e r v e o u r c u s t o m e r s . F i n a l p l a n s a n d s p e c i f i c a t i o n s w i l l d e t e r m i n e d i m e n s i o n s , e l e v a t i o n s a n d p r o d u c t s u s e d . A l l p l a n s a r e c o p y r i g h t e d b y M/ I H o m e s . R e s i d e n t i a l B u i l d i n g C o n t r a c t o r N u m b e r : B C 7 0 1 4 3 8 M I N N E S O T A - N E W P O RT 6-17 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 9d. Council Meeting: January 25, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Preliminary Plat Extension Request - Sawgrass Action Required: Approval Summary: On December 11, 2014 the City Council approved a preliminary plat for a development known as Sawgrass. The proposed development was for 246 single family homes on approximately 103 acres on 20400 County Road 10. On February 23, 2017 the City Council approved an extension for one year, until February 28, 2018. The City has received a request to again extend the plat. The City Council should act on that request, either to deny or approve and extend the plat. Attached to this document is the request and a portion of the items related to the approvals. It is requested that the Council consider the request to further extend the approval. More documents are available at City Hall if you are interested. Prior to a development taking place a final plat would need to be approved along with a development agreement. Financial/Budget: If the development moves forward a formal development agreement would be created outlining responsibilities and cost for the City and developer. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost-effective, and friendly manner. Options: 1.Extend the preliminary plat for Sawgrass for one year until February 29, 2019. 2.Take no action and let the preliminary plat for sawgrass expire after February 28, 2018. Recommendation: If the City Council believes the preliminary plat as approved is in the best interest of the community the Council should approve the extension. If the City Council believes a different type of development would be in the best interest of the community the Council should deny the extension. Council Action: Consider a motion extend the preliminary plat for Sawgrass for one year until February 29, 2019. Attachments: 1.Preliminary Plat Extension Request 2.Staff report for December 11, 2014 City Council meeting 3.Resolution 2014-72 4.Resolution 2014-73 5.Ordinance 2014-290 6.Resolution 2014-74 7.Preliminary Plat of Sawgrass December 21, 2017 Brad Martens City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 RE: Prelim Plat Extension Sawgrass Brad - This letter is a request by the property owner (Corcoran Bay Holdings) to extend the Sawgrass preliminary plat approvals for an additional year. Please place this on the January 25th, 2018 City Council Agenda. Any questions on this please let me know. Sincerely, Greg Hayes Vice President – Real Estate / Development Cc: Greg Ebert Jim Rasmussen 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: December 5, 2014 for the December 11, 2014 City Council Meeting RE: Preliminary PUD Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for “Sawgrass” for Peachtree Partners, LLC on the 103-acre Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (PID 23-119-23-42-0003) (City File 14- 027) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:December 16, 2014 1.Application Request Peachtree Partners, LLC. has submitted a request for approval of Preliminary PUD Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to PUD to allow 246 single family detached homes on 103.32 acres. *NOTE: Staff has attached the most relevant files to this packet; however, due to the size of the project not all files could be attached. The full set of plans and application materials is available at City Hall for inspection during regular business hours. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their December 4th meeting. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval. In addition to the applicant, 3 residents spoke at the public hearing. There were a number of questions about drainage, the future extension of infrastructure and comments about the proposed amendments to the draft approvals from the developer. The Planning Commission reviewed proposed approval modifications from the developer and made modifications to the draft resolutions. The attached resolutions and ordinances reflect that discussion. The following were significant issues that were discussed: a.The approvals require dedication of trails within an easement. The applicant would like to provide the trails in outlots. This is not consistent with City policy and ordinance and the Commission did recommend dedication of easements. b.Hennepin County submitted a letter requesting a 60-foot ½ right-of-way be dedicated as part of this plat. The applicant was showing a 40-foot ½ right-of-way. Hennepin County staff has Agenda Item: _ Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. verbally agreed to a 50-foot ½ right-of-way. The Commission was concerned as this has a significant impact on the development. They deferred this issue to the City Council. c. There was significant discussion regarding the architectural standards in the zoning ordinance. The commission felt strongly that the developer did not need to match the front elevation on the side and rear elevation but that variety in materials and colors must be provided on those elevations when the lots are adjacent to the park. The language in the approving resolution was modified to better address this issue. d. There was significant discussion about lighting for signs. Staff recommended that down lighting not be allowed for the proposed signs as it is prohibited by the ordinance, but the Planning Commission recommended approval as requested by the developer. e. The PUD flexibility standards requested by the developer were discussed at length, ultimately, the Commission recommended approval. The most significant policy issues for the City Council to address are: a. The amount of right-of-way to be dedicated for County Road 10 b. Whether to accept trail outlots as proposed by the developer or easements as recommended by staff. c. Whether or not to accept the PUD flexibility standards. 3. Parks and Trails Commission Review The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed this item at their November 18th meeting. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend the following: • Acceptance of the off road trails in 20-foot easements as shown (totaling 2.88 acres). • The remainder of the park dedication shall be cash in lieu of land. • The developer shall pave the entrance trail shown between County Road 10 and the large wetland area (Outlot N). • Recommended approval of the proposed trails in the wetland buffers as shown. • Recommended that the developer donate a trail easement on the west side of the project adjacent to the creek. No improvements are required in this easement and no park dedication credit will be provided. • The park dedication for the trail easements shall be deeded with each phase of development. • Cash for park dedication shall be paid in full by phase II. Additionally, the Commission recommended that the City and County work to ensure a safe trail crossing on County Road 10 between the project and the existing City park as part of the planned CR 10 improvements. 4. Context Zoning and Land Use The property is currently guided Low Density Residential and zoned RMF-3 (High Density Residential) and UR (Urban Reserve). The Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reclassify the Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 2 December 11, 2014 property from High to Low Density was approved and now the City will be required to rezone to a district compatible with this land use classification. Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties to the west are guided Low Density Residential and Mixed Residential and zoned UR. The properties to the north are guided Mixed Residential and High Density Residential and zoned UR. The properties to the east are guided Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-Public and are zoned UR and P-I (Public Institutional). The four parcels to the south (and north of County Road 10) are guided Commercial and zoned C-1 (neighborhood commercial). The property to the south across County Road 10 is guided Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi- Public and zoned P-I and UR. Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a number of wetlands scattered around the site. The wetland delineation was approved by Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission on January 3, 2014. A High Quality Natural Community is located in the north (Maple Basswood Forest) and east (Floodplain Forest) areas of the site. Rush Creek and an unnamed tributary are adjacent to or within the site; consequently, a portion of the site is in the shoreland overlay district. A portion of the site is also located in the floodplain. Process A PUD sketch plan was submitted for review and comment by the City in the summer of 2014. Generally those comments were incorporated in the plans now being requested for review. An EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet) has been completed and the City Council adopted a determination of No Need for EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) on November 13, 2014. If the requested preliminary applications are approved, the applicant would submit a final PUD development plan and final plat. The applicant has indicated that this will occur in phases. If the final plat and final plan are consistent with the approved preliminary plans, the City must approve the final plat and final plan. A development agreement would be processed for City Council approval with the final plat for each phase. Unless otherwise approved by the City Council, the initial final plat must be submitted within one year of preliminary plat approval, however, subsequent phases would be over an approximately 5 year period. 5. Analysis of Request Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. The applicant provided an extraordinarily detailed narrative with this application and this report will highlight key issues for consideration and review. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 3 December 11, 2014 A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City must deny the rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving PUDs. A PUD must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community and surrounding area. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Rezoning The proposed project is located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) of the City. This is the area planned to be serviced by sanitary sewer and municipal water and these services will be extended by the developer as part of the project. The subject property is zoned Urban Reserve (UR) and RMF-3 (High Density Residential). These land uses were anticipating higher density development consistent with the prior High Density Land Use designation. A comprehensive plan amendment was approved to reclassify this property as Low Density Residential and the zoning must be revised to comply with this new land use designation. The applicant is requesting a rezoning from Urban Reserve (UR) and RMF-3 (High Density Residential) to PUD (planned unit development). The Zoning Ordinance has established a PUD zoning district and the purpose of the PUD district, is to promote creative and efficient use of land by providing design flexibility in the development of residential neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas that would not be possible under a conventional zoning district. In this case, the developer is requesting PUD flexibility primarily for lot size and setbacks. The City must review this request for compliance with the PUD standards as follows: 1. The planned development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The planned unit development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed density of 3.5 units per acre is within the 3-5 units per acre expected in the Low Density Residential land use classification and the plan incorporates the trail, park and street connections anticipated within the site. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 4 December 11, 2014 2. The planned development is not in conflict with the intent of the underlying zoning district. The planned development of 246 single family homes is consistent with the intent of the underlying RSF-3 zoning district, which allows a mix of single and two-family homes. The applicant is requesting approval of PUD zoning for design flexibility to provide a mix of lot sizes for this neighborhood at a density consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The planned development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer will provide both internal infrastructure needed to support their development and trunk infrastructure improvements that will serve a larger development area and well as increased amenities and better neighborhood design than might be expected in a standard subdivision. 4. The planned development or unit thereof is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and/or operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other subsequent unit or phase. The planned development is feasible without dependence upon any other subsequent phase. The project has a 3-5 year phasing plan and development is contingent upon completion of trunk infrastructure improvements. The initial phase will include the construction of the primary project infrastructure, lift station and other key public infrastructure improvement. 5. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing public trails consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and a strong pedestrian connection to the existing City park. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve this site at the developer’s expense. 6. The planned development will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. The planned development is a residential neighborhood developed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore, will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. 7. The quality of the building and site design proposed by the PUD plan shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, shall demonstrate higher standards, more efficient and effective uses of streets, utilities and public facilities, it shall maintain and enhance any Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 5 December 11, 2014 natural resources within the development, and create a public benefit that is greater than what would be achieved through the strict application of the primary zoning regulations The quality of the site design proposed by the PUD shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, install and provide more efficient use of streets, utilities and public facilities than may otherwise be expected and create public benefit that is greater than would otherwise be achieved due to the construction and financing of all related infrastructure improvements. The development will meet the City’s density goals while preserving 38% of the site as open space maintained by the homeowner’s association (much of it wetland and ponding areas, but wooded areas and public trails as well) and replanting 1,620 new trees. The applicant has not yet determined the builder(s) for the project, but has agreed to generally comply with the City’s architectural design standards. The Zoning Ordinance states that “the rezoning of the property defined in the development plan shall not become effective until such time as the City Council approves an ordinance reflecting said amendment, which shall take place at the time that the City Council approves the final development plan.” The Council should approve the rezoning to be effect at such time as the final PUD development plan is adopted. Preliminary PUD Development Plan The PUD offers enhanced flexibility to develop the site through the relaxation of most typical zoning district standards. The PUD allows for a greater variety of land uses, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this flexibility, the City expects a higher level of design and a more sensitive development than might normally be the case. The proposal includes 226 single family homes, 20 twinhomes and several common lots/outlots. The common areas would be maintained by the HOA. The 3 different single family lot sizes and planned association maintained housing (twinhomes) in the southeast corner of the site would be part of a master HOA that would be responsible for maintenance of the cul de sac and park parkway landscaping, entrance signage, common open space areas and similar features. Lot Size The Zoning Ordinance states that the purpose of the RSF-3 district is “… to be the primary single- family zoning district for future residential developments. The smaller lot area will make efficient use of the City’s land supply and investment in public utilities and allow the City to efficiently protect and preserve its natural resources such as wetlands and woodlands. In addition, the smaller lot area will help the City meet its density goal for new single-family homes. Single family homes, as well as two- family dwellings are allowed in this district.” The RSF-3 district requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet and a minimum lot width of 65 feet. The plan shows single family residential lots in three sizes: 55-foot wide lots, 65-foot wide lots and 75-foot lots. Lot areas range from 6,555 square feet to 20,182 square feet. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 6 December 11, 2014 The PUD zoning allows flexibility from the standard lot sizes and the applicant has requested PUD flexibility to reduce the minimum lot sizes. While the lot sizes are less than the ordinance allows, the resulting density remains at the low end of the 3-5 units per acre that the Comprehensive Plan anticipates. Setbacks The plan shows some variety from the standard setback requirements as follows: RSF-3 Ordinance Standard Requested PUD Flexibility Single Family Two-Family dwellings Single Family Detached Villas Minimum Lot Area 7,500 square feet 15,000 square feet 5,000 sq. ft. (for flexibility--the smallest lot shown is 6,555) 4,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot width 65 feet 100 feet 55’ 40’ Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks Front, From all other 20 feet 25 feet 20 feet 20 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square 15 feet N/A 15 feeta 15 feeta Deck (side and rear) 10 feet 10 feet Side (living) 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet 5 feet Side (garage)** 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Rear 30 feet 25 feet 25 feet 20 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet Driveway setback 5 feet 5 feet 2 feetb 2 feetb **Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 feet. a – Porches may be allowed to encroach and same on either front set-back on corner lots. b – Allowed within set-back with ACC and City approval. The ordinance requires a 15-foot minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels. The applicant has requested PUD flexibility to reduce this separation to 10 feet. Staff notes that this is a fairly common separation in other communities. However, in order to ensure that the 5-foot wide drainage and utility easement remains clear on each side of the house, we have included a condition that no accessory structures or equipment (such as air conditioning units, fireplace, etc.) be allowed to encroach into this 5-foot setback. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 7 December 11, 2014 The applicant is marketing the southeast corner of the site for an association maintained product and is requesting flexibility from the ordinance standards as follows: RMF-1 Twinhome Sawgrass PUD Twinhome RMF-1 Townhome Sawgrass PUD Townhome Min. Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. 7,500 sq. ft. per unit 4,000 per unit 5,400 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. per unit Min. Lot Width at Front Set-Back 150 feet 75 feet per unit 60 feet 30 feet per unit Min. Side Set- Back 0 feet 10 feetd 10 feetd 10 feetc Min. Front Yard Set-Back 25 feet 20 feet 25 feet 20 feetc Min. Rear Yard Set-Back 25 feet 20 feet 25 feet 15 feet Porches 10 feeta 10 feeta Decks 10 feetb 0 feet Shared Driveway Allowed Allowed a – Porches may be allowed to encroach and same on either front set-back on corner lots. b – Allowed within set-back with ACC and City approval. c – From ROW or private drive d – Between Structures Staff does not support shared drives for single family homes, but does support them for twinhomes and townhomes as part of a good site plan. We will review details at the time of final plan approval. While the Zoning Ordinance allows a reduced front yard setback, it does so with the understanding that the garages will be setback from the front home elevation, thereby allowing adequate driveway space. Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that the driveway be at least 22 feet in length between the front of the garage and the street, roadway or sidewalk; and “not impede pedestrian or traffic circulation or access to any other dwelling unit, nor shall it adversely affect the ability to provide public utilities or public safety.” The final PUD development plan must clearly show compliance with these requirements. Staff recommends that driveways for single family homes comply with the 5-foot side yard setback to ensure that driveways remain outside of the City’s drainage and utility easements. Design Requirements When the current Zoning Ordinance was adopted in 2011, it included a new section on Design Requirements for each zoning district. The RSF-3 district is subject to these standards. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility from several of these standards, as noted below. A. Front Elevation: 1. Each elevation facing a street or park shall have a minimum of 50% comprised on (sic) natural material consisting of brick, stone, stucco, hardi-board, redwood, cedar or other similar materials. A minimum of two different materials is required, except that brick may be used on the entire elevation. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 8 December 11, 2014 2. Design of street and park fronting exterior elevations shall be varied with a minimum of five different styles provided in the development. 3. Homes in proximity to each other shall not look alike in terms of the combination of color of siding, accent and roofing materials. The home under consideration will be compared to the two homes on each side and to the three homes directly facing it. The applicant has indicated that they will comply with all of these requirements. Since the applicant does not have a builder for the project, it is not clear how the applicant intends to meet this requirement on those elevations, but compliance will be reviewed with building permit. The City has noted with previous developments that LP siding can be used to meet the front elevation requirements. The intent of this section appears to be to provide some variety in the number and quality of the materials used on the front elevation. The applicant would like to clarify that these requirements do not preclude two homes from using the same color and type of roofing products adjacent to one another, but it does ensure that the combination of colors for roofing, siding, trim, etc. are not exactly the same neighbor to neighbor. We agree and find that the limited options for roofing materials and colors make matching materials adjacent to each other acceptable provided the elevation and other material types and colors are not the same as the adjacent single family home. In the twinhome/townhome development in the southeast corner, the applicant has asked for some flexibility from these standards. The applicant notes that it is very common and often desired to have twinhomes with a more consistent appearance and they are requesting an exemption from these provisions for twinhomes. We agree that more consistency between these types of units may be desirable, but staff believes that some variety between these units is still possible and desirable. B. Garages: 1. The garage shall not comprise more than 55 percent of the viewable ground floor street- facing linear building frontage. This standard is based on the measurement of the entire garage structure and not on a measurement of the garage door or doors only. Corner lots are 2. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior design of the home. The applicant has requested PUD flexibility from requirement that garages not comprise more than 60% of the front of the single family home and not more than 70% of the twinhome/townhome units. Staff finds that the small lots, combined with consumer demand for large garages makes compliance more difficult. The applicant will comply with the other design criteria designed to de-emphasize the garage and bring the garage into the home. The garage doors shall be architecturally styled to match the exterior design of the home. Staff recommends approval of this flexibility. C. Roof: 1. Architectural design roofing materials including asphalt shingles, wood shingles (including shake), concrete, clay, ceramic tile roofs or residential steel roofing material (with hidden fasteners) are required on all roofs. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 9 December 11, 2014 2. Overhangs must be a minimum of 12 inches. Peachtree Partners, LLC. has committed to complying with these requirements. D. Side and Rear Facades: 1. Equal architectural treatment on all sides of the building (materials, articulation, etc.) shall be used for all new residential construction when located on or visible from an arterial road way or public park. Accenting shall be accomplished by including accenting materials and design on all facades. 2. Each side elevation shall have at least one window or door opening. 3. A maximum of 18 inches of the foundation wall may be exposed on any elevation. Staff believes that the intent of D.1. is to ensure that the higher quality and variety of materials on the front of the home be extended to the side and rear of the home when located on or visible from an arterial road or public park. This development has several homes that will be visible from the public park (across CR 10). The backs of these homes will be very visible from the park and should be subject to a higher level of design. The applicant believes that the ordinance language simply means that side and rear elevations must be consistent with each other, but is not required to incorporate materials and design elements from the front elevation. Furthermore, they believe that the proposed berm along CR 10 will adequately screen the rear of the home. • The Planning Commission found that regardless of the berm and landscaping proposed, the homes that are visible from a public park must have upgraded side and rear elevations as required by ordinance. Homeowners Association The development will have a homeowners association (HOA) to maintain the common elements, including the open space areas, development signage and cul de sac/island plantings. Additionally, the association maintained homes planned for the southeast corner of the site would likely have a sub-association to provide full maintenance of the home exterior, including mowing and plowing. A draft of the HOA documents has been submitted. A final draft of the HOA documents shall be submitted for City review and approval with the final PUD development plan application for phase I. Parking Guest parking is not required for single family homes. Section 1060.060 of the ordinance requires a single stall garage for single family homes. The proposed homes would have a minimum of a two- car garage. This complies with ordinance requirements. However, if multi-family housing is ultimately proposed in the southeast portion of the site, some guest parking may be required. We will review this issue when a PUD final plan is submitted for that portion of the site. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 10 December 11, 2014 The local streets within the subdivision are 28 feet wide streets within a 50-foot right-of-way. This is adequate to accommodate on-street parking on one side. This is consistent with the City’s engineering design standards and should be adequate to provide guest parking in the other neighborhoods. The developer should provide a parking plan for on-street and off-street parking throughout the development. At the time of building permit submittal, the developer should also provide a graphic to confirm that the driveways in front of the homes have a minimum driveway length of 22-feet to accommodate parking in front of the garages. The City requires all streets to be public. The developer has requested the flexibility to allow private streets in the association maintained housing area. Staff recommends that a public street be provided for the proposed twinhome development. However, private drives are very common in townhome developments and staff recommends that the issue be discussed in more detail with the final plan for that area. Staff finds that private streets can be acceptable if appropriate design standards and maintain agreements are developed. No direct driveway access and no parking will be permitted on County Road 10. Landscaping The City has no tree preservation requirements. The City does encourage preservation of significant trees particularly those shown on the natural resource inventory. The applicant has completed a tree survey of the more than 8,000 significant trees on site. The current development proposal preserves 44.6% of the significant trees. Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance requires 1 overstory tree for each single family home and a variety of landscaping along the perimeter of the site, along the streets, within the private park and adjacent to wetlands. The applicant is proposing to plant more than 1,600 new trees in this development. Each new home will be required to plant a minimum of 3 trees on their property and the developer will be installing street trees and trees in the open space areas. The plan shows overstory trees along each of the public streets and additional plantings at the project entries off County Road 10. This is generally consistent with the ordinance requirements; however, the developer should provide more detail about the landscaping plan, including the cul de sac island plantings. Staff recommends that the developer provide a revised landscaping plan that identifies the number, location, species and plant size to ensure compliance with the ordinance. Additionally, care should be given to provide a variety of trees species to ensure protection against disease and insects. This detailed plan must be submitted for City review and approval as part of the final PUD development plan. Signage Chapter 84 of the City Code regulates signage. Residential developments are allowed two development signs at the main entrance, not to exceed 32 square feet in area or 6 feet in height. One sign not to exceed 16 square feet may be allowed at a secondary entrance. PUD flexibility is requested to exceed these signage limits as described in the applicant’s narrative. The preliminary PUD development plans show 2 monument signs at the main entrance on County Road 10 plus a median monument and 1 sign at the western entrance off County Road 10. The sign plans show an Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 11 December 11, 2014 18 square foot sign on a larger base with decorative elements for the main entry monuments and a median monument with approximately 10 square feet of sign area. A sign detail has been provided as an example, but no specific details have been provided. The developer has requested approval of the following PUD flexibility, which reflects more and large signs than shown on the submitted Preliminary Sign Plan exhibit (staff’s recommendation is after each item): • Up to three signs allowed at each entrance. One on each side and one in the median as applicable. • Agreed • Sign area is measured by drawing a box around the lettering and shall not exceed 80 sq. ft. per entrance. Individual signs may not exceed 40 sq. ft. • Total signage at the main entrance shall not exceed 80 sq. ft. Individual monument signs shall not exceed 40 sq. ft. • Total signage at the second entrance shall not exceed 40 sq. ft. Individual monument signs shall not exceed 20 square feet. • Signs may be located adjacent to the right of way (ROW) and in the case of signs in the median signs may be located in the ROW. • Median signs may be located in the right-of-way, provided the applicant provides an exhibit showing that sight visibility is maintained. • Monument signs must comply with the minimum 10-foot setback and be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. • Uplighting that does not glare onto adjacent property will be allowed. Illuminated and/or backlit lettering will be allowed. • The ordinance requires that any illumination of such signs must be external with downward focused lighting on a timer. While we believe our sign ordinance standards are very restrictive, we believe that prohibiting uplighting is a valid restriction as such lighting can be distracting to motorists and residents. Staff supports the illuminated and/or backlit lettering requested and the downward focused lighting. Lighting must comply with the standards in Section 1060.040 and glare, whether direct or reflected, shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. • Signs and related structures will be allowed up to 12’ in height. • Monument signs shall not exceed 8 feet in height, however, median monuments may be allowed up to 11 feet tall. Additionally, the Parks and Trails Commission indicated a desire for trailhead signage that would be provided generally where the trails cross public streets. These provide good wayfinding through the neighborhood, but the developer must work with City staff to ensure that the trail signage is consistent with City standards. Staff recommends that the developer submit a master signage plan with sign details for design review by the Planning Commission and City Council prior to approval of the final PUD development plan. Utilities Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 12 December 11, 2014 Municipal sewer and water are not currently available to the site and would need to be extended to service the property prior issuance of building permits. The City Engineer has completed a feasibility study to show how sanitary sewer and municipal water could be extended to the site. The City of Corcoran has indicated that the cost to extend municipal utilities to a property should be borne by the property developer. At this time those final costs are unknown, but staff has developed an estimate of those costs with a feasibility study. All improvements within the site will be completed by the developer. All off-site improvements will be completed by the City and financed by the developer. City policy also requires the developer to extend sanitary sewer and water stubs to the property boundaries to allow future extension to surrounding properties. These surrounding properties would not be required to hook up to sewer and water at this time, but it is common practice for the developer to extend utilities to the property line to allow for future extensions. The cost to extend the utilities to the property line would be borne by the developer. Wetlands The developer completed a MNRAM for the wetlands on site and the City engineer has confirmed that they are a mix of medium and high quality wetlands. Many of these wetlands have been impacted by farming over the years, but retain their higher rankings due to their proximity to the creek. Wetland mitigation is proposed and is subject to review and approval from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. The ECW MC is the LGU for the Wetland Conservation Act. All wetlands and buffers must be blanketed by a drainage and utility easement. The applicant has requested PUD flexibility to allow alternative wetland buffers and setbacks in compliance with Section 1050.010, Subd. 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. The ordinance allows the City to approve these alternative buffers when “because of the unique physical characteristics of a specific parcel of land, narrower buffer strips may be necessary to allow for a reasonable use of land”. In this case, staff finds that the alternative wetland buffers are appropriate because the wetland are generally located in the open space corridor, which would serve a similar function to a wetland buffer. However, in exchange for this flexibility, the City does require the developer to provide extraordinary management practices, as outlined in the City Zoning Ordinance. The plans note that an average buffer of 25 feet is proposed, but the actual buffers must be dimensioned on the plans. The plans appear to be generally consistent with the buffer requirements. The plans must also identify the location of the wetland buffer monument signs in compliance with the ordinance. Wetland Impacts The plan shows a number of trails located within the wetland buffer. Although the ordinance does allow trails in the wetland buffer setback area, it is silent on the concept of trails in the buffer itself. The applicant notes that due to the location of wetlands and the size of the buffers, the impact to the Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 13 December 11, 2014 buffers could not be avoided. To offset the impacts created by the trail being located in the buffer, the applicant increased the amount of buffer area in an amount equal to the impact. As noted by the developer, this ultimately allows the trail to be located in the open space away from homes and provides for a great trail experience. • Given that the buffers are primarily located in the common areas, the developer has requested some trails within the buffer areas. The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed this request and recommends approval of this flexibility. Floodplain There are approximately 3 acres of floodplain on the property. There are no impacts to the 100 year floodplain and the floodplain does not impact any home sites. The proposed ponds are located outside the floodplain. The portion of the trail meanders in and out of the 500 year flood plain will be elevated above the flood elevation. Shoreland The western portion of the property includes land in the Shoreland Overly District. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility from the Shoreland Overlay District due to the unique characteristics of the property. The shoreland overlay district is for the creek that meanders through the site. The applicant’s narrative does an excellent job of outlining the issues, request and mitigating factors: • Impervious Surface. The developer has done an excellent job of retaining open space next to the portion of the creek that is on the subject property. This open space will mitigate any impacts from the planned homes. Staff recommends approval of the PUD flexibility to allow more than 25% impervious surface coverage per lot in this area based on the finding that the total impervious surface coverage in this area will not exceed 25%. There is another portion of the site that is in the shoreland overly district for the creek that is located on the other side of County Road 10. Because all of this property is separated from the creek by County Road 10 and all drainage will flow north away from the creek, staff supports the PUD flexibility to waive the shoreland requirements for this area as well. • Building Height. The shoreland overlay district restricts building height to 25 feet, but we support the staff request to allow 35-foot building heights as allowed in areas outside the shoreland district. None of the homes are riparian lots and this is not a navigable waterway, so the impact would be negligible. • Lot Width. The ordinance requires a 75-foot minimum lot width. The applicant is requesting lots as small as 55 feet wide. Staff supports this request because the planned development will preserve approximately 40 acres (38% of the site) as permanent open space and has included stormwater management techniques within the development to ensure protection of the shoreland areas. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 14 December 11, 2014 • Setback. The ordinance requires a 50-foot setback from County Roads. The lots would be separated from the County road by an outlot so this condition would not apply. We support the setbacks approved as part of the PUD. Storm Water Management The proposed plan identifies a number of ponds throughout the site. The ponding must provide treatment and rate control. The developer may not increase the rate of runoff onto other properties and existing drainage through the site must be maintained. The developer’s plan is generally in compliance with these regulations. The City and the watershed will both review the grading plans for compliance with the applicable regulations. The ponds will need to be blanketed by drainage and utility easements. The developer has provided 10-foot drainage and utility easements along the front and rear lot lines and 5-foot drainage and utility easements along the side lot lines for the single family lots. This is consistent with the engineering design standards. Off Site Storm water Management The developer and the City are working with the adjacent property owners to the north to address the existing off-site drainage issues as part of this development. The area to the north has a significant floodplain and the floodplain will not be altered due to impacts of the project. Historical City storm water maps had shown a northwest ditch route for the site’s easterly wetland. The 1971 aerial photo is given in Attachment C, however current topography shows this route is no longer feasible. The changes to the landscape from houses / tree canopy / farming practices over the last 40 years has created a situation where a northerly flow path is more dominant in the current condition. To mitigate the impact of more volume of runoff, the City has been in contact with the residents to the north who have expressed a willingness to participate in a solution so the development’s outlet of the large Sawgrass wetland does not exacerbate existing conditions. Therefore, the City will work with the residents and developer to implement a conveyance solution. Elm Creek Watershed will be reviewing plans and as the LGU also should issue wetland permits that will be pursued under a “No Loss”. Financing will be at the developer’s expense, and implementing an offsite solution assumes the northerly landowners continue to cooperate. The City Engineer’s memo includes more detail and compliance with recommendations in that memo is a condition of approval. Streets A traffic study was completed by the City as part of the feasibility study and is discussed in the City Engineer’s report. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 15 December 11, 2014 The City is working with Hennepin County to realign the CR10/CR 50 intersection near this site. The developer will be responsible for a share of these improvements. The remainder of the local streets within the development are shown with tree-lined boulevards and landscaped islands in the cul de sacs. These local streets are 28 feet wide and located in 50-foot rights-of-way, which are generally consistent with the City Engineering Design Standards. The landscaped islands provide an attractive amenity for the development, reduce impervious surface coverage and can provide opportunities for snow storage. The developer should provide more detailed information about the proposed landscaping within the islands. As noted with the Ravinia subdivision, staff believes that the landscaping islands are an amenity and could become a standard for the City, but should be monitored as the City takes over responsibility for snowplowing these public streets in the future. Hennepin County transportation has received a copy of the proposed plat and has indicated that they will provide comments, but the City has not yet received these comments. We expect to be able to provide an update at the City Council meeting, but the engineer’s memo includes several items that we expect the County to require based on conversations with staff. Typically, the County has required additional right-of-way along County Road 10 and we expect this to be a condition of approval. The narrative notes that a 40-foot ½ right-of-way is proposed to be dedicated, but it must be clearly dimensioned on the preliminary plat and plans. Access As noted in the previous section, the main access to the site would be from County Road 10 near the center of the site, with a secondary access off County Road 10 near the western border of the site. Additionally, the applicant has provided street stubs to the Gleason property this property surrounds, as well as stubs to the north and east as required. The road in the northeast portion of the site will be used to access the lift station and an easement to provide the sewer connection to CR 116 may also be graded and graveled to provide an emergency vehicle access; however, final design will occur with easement negotiations. Lighting Decorative streetlights are proposed throughout the development and generally appear to comply with the City policies. The streetlights would need to comply with the requirements of Section 1040.040 of the Zoning Ordinance and the Engineering Design Standards. The developer must work with the City to develop standards and revise the plans as needed to provide street lighting. Parks, Trails and Open Space Under the current ordinance, park dedication is required at 11% of the net pre-development area or 11% of the appraised value of the land for developments like this with between 3-5 units per acre. The City should generally accept park dedication in the form of land where shown on the maps; however, the City may choose to accept cash or a combination of cash and land. The City may Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 16 December 11, 2014 accept cash-in-lieu of land at 11% of the value of the land with a maximum rate of $4,000 per unit for each new unit located inside of the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area). The applicant has provided an appraisal report that shows the land value at $2,893,000. In this case, the plat shows 90.45 pre-development net acres, which would require: • Park dedication of 9.95 net acres (90.45 x 11%); • Cash in lieu of land of $318,230 ($2,893,000 x 11%); or • Some combination of land and cash. The applicant is showing a series of sidewalks and trails throughout the site. The Comprehensive Plan includes the 2030 Parks & Trails Plan shows an off-road trail on the north side of the site winding through the site and connecting to the existing City park. The plan is generally consistent with these trail locations. The applicant has done a good job of preserving the natural areas shown on the Comprehensive Plan as open space and 38% of the site (approximately 40 acres) is preserved as permanent open space. The plans show 1.3 miles of trail and 2.0 miles of sidewalk within this development. The trail locations shown on the plans are generally consistent with the adopted parks plans. However, the trail connection two County Road 10 is shifted east from the adopted plan to the project entrance. From a safety standpoint, this makes sense. However, staff notes that the new trail connection is next to a street rather than in an off-road location. The current location of the trail connection to County Road 10 is a trail in lieu of a sidewalk. • The Parks and Trails Commission recommended that this segment of trail be dedicated to the City and that park dedication credit be given, but that the developer is responsible for paving this segment of trail without reimbursement. • The Parks and Trails Commission also recommended that the future shown on the west side of the project be deed as a trail easement, but that no park dedication credit is granted and no improvements made because the final alignment of the trail may change as surrounding properties develop. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 17 December 11, 2014 Park dedication shall only be granted for trail easement areas as shown on the Comprehensive Plan and will not be given for trails located within public right-of-way. The developer is required to provide finished grading and ground cover for all park, playground, trail and public open spaces within their developments. No credit toward the required dedication shall be given for this work. • The trail locations are generally consistent with the locations shown on the Comprehensive Plan, but the Commission should review and comment. • If credit is given for the 20-foot trail easement over all trails as shown by the developer, that would be 2.88 acres or 28.97% (2.88/9.95) of the required park dedication for this project (2.93 acres would actually be dedicated, but as noted above, no credit will be given for the western portion). • Park dedication due on this site would be $318,230 if all in cash. However, if credit is given for the trails, the area of the trails would satisfy 28.97% of the park dedication requirement, leaving 71.03% of the dedication due in land or approximately $226,039. • The Parks and Trails Commission recommended that the full park dedication amount be paid with the 2nd phase of development. • Staff recommends that the City work with the developer to schedule the park dedication payments and timing of the credit to be given for paving the trails. The reimbursement amount could be approximately $95,355 (based on $15/lf paving costs described by the developer in the narrative), which would result in a net contribution of approximately $130,684 (the developer has a slightly different number in his narrative and the actual number would be finalized with the final plat). The Parks & Trails Plan also shows an on-road trail on County Road 10. The City is currently working with Hennepin County on the road realignment options and will evaluate this trail as part of the transportation study and ongoing CR 10 design. Five-foot wide sidewalks are required to be provided on one side of each public street. Generally the plans show compliance with these requirements; however, the plans shall be revised to show these sidewalks to ensure connections throughout the entire development. Specifically: • The sidewalk locations should be extended through the association maintained neighborhood planned in the southeast corner of the site. o The applicant has suggested that, depending on the product type provided, they may request approval of a private street here. Regardless, of whether this is approved with a public or private street, staff believes that this sidewalk connection is important and has included this as a condition of approval. • To that end, we recommend that the sidewalk be moved to the south side of Street F so that this neighborhood cannot connect to the sidewalk system without a mid-block crossing. The Parks and Trails Commission did not feel strongly about this issue, but we have added a condition that the final location be determined with staff prior to approval of the final plat. • We also recommend that the sidewalk extension be shown on the stub street off the east side of the Street F cul de sac for a future sidewalk connection. Natural Resource Corridor This natural resource corridor is shown as preserved with a trail corridor. The City’s Comprehensive Plan encourages preservation of this corridor but does not recommend the land be taken as public Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 18 December 11, 2014 park. Staff recommends that the land be preserved and owned/maintained by the Homeowners Association. Community Park A public park to serve as the neighborhood park exists across County Road 10. This is defined in the Parks Plan as a community park, but will also serve the neighborhood park needs of the neighborhood, as noted by the Parks and Trails Commission in March. Good access is provided to this park and the playground by the planned trail and sidewalk connections. Our Comprehensive Plan says that neighborhood parks should be within ½ mile of residents. The applicant has provided an exhibit showing that all homes within this development would be within this ½ mile radius of the existing playground and most would be within ¼ mile. PUD Flexibility Standards In addition to the PUD flexibilities already outlined above, the developer has asked the City to consider an additional set of PUD flexibility standards that would allow some ability to modify the plan without a complete PUD amendment if the modifications fall with certain parameters. This would give them the ability to respond to changes in the marketplace and needs of different builders. The City has the ability to approve these flexibilities as part of the PUD and incorporate them into a development contract. Specifically: 1. Open Space – The total amount of open space will not be reduced by more than 2.5% or 1 acre from the amount shown in the approved PUD. 2. Development Footprint - Total development footprint as identified by street right-of-way and total lotted area cannot increase by more than 1 acre. 3. Wetland Buffer - At all times we will not reduce the amount of wetland buffer provided. 4. Storm Water - Storm water treatment areas may be modified, provided that the overall treatment standards are still equal to are greater than the standards approved with the Preliminary Plat. 5. Trails – Any plan must generally provide an east-west and north-south trail link as approved with the PUD Preliminary Plan and while the location of trails may be slightly adjusted the overall locations and length of trails will be honored. 6. Entrance Location(s) - Main entrance location off CR 10 will remain unchanged. 7. Total Units – The total units cannot be less than 235 (3.34 units /acre) and more than 275 (3.91 units/acre) without amending the PUD. 8. Association Maintained Housing –Blocks 20, 21 and Outlot O must be maintained and actively marketed for association maintained housing until the final phase is approved. If at that time with active marketing this has not sold, this area may be platted as single family. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 19 December 11, 2014 9. Housing Types– Housing/Lot types may change without amending the PUD so long as they meet the approved PUD lot standards. 10. Private Streets – If townhomes are added to the PUD private streets will be allowed, if needed, in the townhome areas to accommodate that housing type. 11. Lots and Blocks - Lots sizes may change within the limits approved, however, blocks as arranged need to stay generally consistent with approved Preliminary PUD and Plat. Staff finds that the proposed PUD flexibility provides the City assurances that the general development concept will be maintained while the developer the flexibility to respond to the marketplace. This is particularly important for the association maintained area planned for the southeast portion of the site, but may be applicable in other areas. If the City approves this flexibility, the only change staff would recommend is that number 10 be changed to say that private streets MAY be allowed. • This concept of PUD flexibility standards is new to the City and unique to the project. The Commission should comment on this proposal. Preliminary Plat The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat to allow the creation of 246 homes on this 103.32-acre site. The proposed development would have a net density (post-development) of approximately 3.5 units per acre. This is consistent with the land use plan, which would allow a density of 3-5 units per acre. Lot Size The PUD district has no minimum standards for lot size; however, the proposed development would comply with the density requirements permitted by the PUD. Development Phasing The developer plans to develop this project in 3 phases. The developer would like to begin work in 2015. Timing will be contingent upon extension of public infrastructure. The phasing plan may be modified at each stage to better correspond with public improvements. The Zoning Ordinance requires that construction begin within 1 year of the rezoning to PUD (which will occur with approval of the final PUD development plan for Phase I, except that the City Council may extend this time period for 1 additional year and the Subdivision Ordinance requires submittal of a final plat application within 1 year of preliminary plat approval unless otherwise approved by the City Council). Due the infrastructure issues, the City Council may wish to extend this approval to the full 2 years from the date of approval. Through the PUD process, the City has the legal authority to negotiate a phasing plan with the developer. The City does not have this same authority with standard zoning. The Council may approve the attached phasing plan. The phasing plan would be subject to the above standards in Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 20 December 11, 2014 the sense that the final plat for the 1st phase of development must be submitted within 2 years. This initial final plat will include all of the property, but phases 2 and 3 will likely be shown as outlots. The City Council may want to approve the attached phasing plan to ensure an understanding of the project timing. Obviously, the phasing schedule is the developer’s best estimate and is subject to change depending on market conditions and infrastructure timing. Staff recommends that all of the right-of-way for County Road 10 be dedicated with the first final plat. C. Conclusions Staff finds that the proposed plan is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The plan for single family homes provides many of the essential public components of the Comprehensive Plan, including open spaces, tree-lined streets and strong pedestrian connections. These features can establish the public realm of the neighborhood and provide a unique sense of place. The developer is requesting PUD flexibility for: • Reduced lot sizes (area and width), • Reduced setbacks, • Signage (sign area and number), • Flexibility from the architectural design standards, regarding garages, • Alternative wetland buffers, • Trails located within the buffer, • Shoreland Overlay District flexibility related to lot coverage, lot width, setbacks and building height. In return for this flexibility, the developer is providing: • HOA-maintained permanent open space (38% of the site), • HOA-maintained landscaping in the cul de sac islands and entry monument, • A restored urban forest with more than 1,620 new trees, • Decorative street lighting, • Sidewalks all public streets, • Dedication of a trail easement on the west side of the property without park dedication credit • Paving of the entry trail at no cost, • Preservation/restoration/enhancement of wetlands, • Financing of trunk infrastructure improvements, including a lift station in the project and improvements to County Road 10, • Life-cycle housing opportunities with single family detached homes and some association maintained housing planned. Staff has reviewed the plan for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. Staff noted in the staff report the outstanding that must be addressed and we have included conditions in the attached draft resolutions to address these issues. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 21 December 11, 2014 Next Steps If the application request is approved by the City Council, the applicant would be able to proceed with the Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat for each phase. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: a. Resolution 2014-72 approving the preliminary plat b. Resolution 2014-73 approving the preliminary PUD development plan c. Ordinance 2014-290 approving the rezoning to PUD d. Resolution 2014-74 approving finding of fact for the rezoning Attachments a. Resolution approving the preliminary plat b. Resolution approving the preliminary PUD development plan c. Ordinance approving the rezoning to PUD d. Resolution approving finding of fact for the rezoning e. Engineer’s Memo dated November 24, 2014 f. Applicant’s Narrative dated November 21, 2014 g. Site Graphics received November 21, 2014(partial only – full set available at City hall) h. Preliminary Plat received November 21, 2014 i. Exhibits dated November 21, 2014 j. Hennepin County Comments dated December 1, 2014 k. Letter from David Foy and Chuck Lymangood dated November 30, 2014 Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning (14-027) 22 December 11, 2014 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -72 Motion By: Asleson Seconded By: Thomas December 11, 2014 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "SAWGRASS" FOR PEACHTREE PARTNERS, LLC ON THE 103 -ACRE SCHENDEL PROPERTY AT 20400 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 23 -119- 23 -42 -0003) (CITY FILE 14 -027) WHEREAS, Peachtree Partners, LLC ( "the applicant ") has requested approval of a preliminary plat for 246 single family homes on a 103.32 -acre parcel legally described as: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to allow the creation of 246 single family lots and several outlots, in accordance with the application materials and plans received by the City on October 3, 2014 and revisions received November 21, 2014, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the rezoning to PUD and preliminary PUD development plan. 3. The application shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer's memo dated November 24, 2014. 4. The application is subject to the review and approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. The applicant shall comply with any conditions of approval from the watershed. 5. The application is subject to the review and approval by Hennepin County. The applicant shall comply with any conditions of approval from the County. 6. Development standards shall be as approved as part of the PUD. 7. The development shall be subject to all conditions of the preliminary PUD development plan approval. 8. The extension of sanitary sewer and municipal water is required to serve this site. Approval of this preliminary plat is contingent upon extension of these services to the site. Page 1 of 4 City of Corcoran December 11, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -72 9. Approval shall expire within two years of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat. VOTING AYE Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 11`h day of December 2014. ST: J nie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 2 of 4 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -72 ATTACHMENT A Legal Description per Title Commitment File No. 37676 December 11, 2014 Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 which was formerly called the Minneapolis Monticello road, excepting therefrom the following described parcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feet of the East 990.00 feet of the South 792.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter said last described point being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet to the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet to the actual point of beginning. Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet to the center line of County Road #10 and to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet to the center line of County Road #10; Page 3 of 4 City of Corcoran December 11, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -72 thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of 205.00 feet more or less to actual point of beginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West to the center line of the road; thence Southeasterly along said center line to an intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the point of beginning; thence North 45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center of County Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point of beginning. Tract B: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerline of Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet to the intersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, to the intersection with said East line; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet to the point of beginning. Tract C: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty -three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty -three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter SE1 /4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property Page 4 of 4 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 Motion By: Thomas Seconded By: Asleson December 11, 2014 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLAN FOR SAWGRASS" FOR PEACHTREE PARTNERS, LLC ON THE 103 -ACRE SCHENDEL PROPERTY AT 20400 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 23- 119 -23 -42 -0003) (CITY FILE 14 -027) WHEREAS, Peachtree Partners, LLC ( "the applicant ") has requested approval of a preliminary PUD development plan for 246 single family homes on a 103.32 -acre parcel legally described as: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a preliminary PUD development plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary PUD development plan is approved to allow the creation of 226 single family homes, 20 twinhomes and several outlots, in accordance with the application materials and plans received by the City on October 3, 214 and revisions received November 21, 2014, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning and preliminary plat. 3. The applicant shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer's memo dated November 24, 2014. 4. The approval is subject to the review and approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. The applicant shall comply with any conditions of approval from the watershed. 5. The application is subject to the review and approval by Hennepin County. The applicant is required to obtain permits and approvals from the County as needed. 6. The extension of sanitary sewer and municipal water is required to serve this site. Approval of this PUD is contingent upon extension of these services to the site. 7. The preliminary PUD development plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Page 1 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 8. All platted residential lots shall comply with the following setbacks: December 11, 2014 9. Mechanical equipment (including air conditioning units) must be located in the side or rear yard and must be located a minimum of 5 feet from the property line. 10. All properties must have a minimum 22 -foot driveway parking area in front of the garage that does not overlap into sidewalks, drives or streets. The building permit must dimension this parking area in front of the garage. Architectural and Design standards 11. All Design Requirements for the RSF -3 district described in Section 1040.050, Subd. 8 shall be met, except that PUD flexibility is granted for the following: a. Adjacent homes may be allowed to have the same color and type of roofing product provided the architectural details and material colors for the home are different. Page 2 of 10 Detached Single Family Detached Villas Twinhome Townhome 5,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. /per for flexibility - -the unit smallest lot shown is Minimum Lot Area 6,555) Minimum lot width 55 feet 40 feet 75 feet 30 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks Front, From all 20 feet 20 feet 22 feet 20 feet other streets Front Porch (5 15 feet* 15 feet* 15 feet* 15 feet* 120 square feet) 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet between Deck (side and buildings (0 rear) between units Side (living) 5 feet 5 feet 10 feet 10 feet Side (garage) ** 5 feet 5 feet 10 feet 10 feet Rear 25 feet 20 feet 20 feet 15 feet Maximum 35 feel 35 feel 35 feel 35 fee Principal Building Height Driveway 5 feet 5 feeI 5 feet between 5 feet between setback buildings buildings Porches may be allowed to encroach and same on either front setback on corner lots. 9. Mechanical equipment (including air conditioning units) must be located in the side or rear yard and must be located a minimum of 5 feet from the property line. 10. All properties must have a minimum 22 -foot driveway parking area in front of the garage that does not overlap into sidewalks, drives or streets. The building permit must dimension this parking area in front of the garage. Architectural and Design standards 11. All Design Requirements for the RSF -3 district described in Section 1040.050, Subd. 8 shall be met, except that PUD flexibility is granted for the following: a. Adjacent homes may be allowed to have the same color and type of roofing product provided the architectural details and material colors for the home are different. Page 2 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 December 11, 2014 Town home/twinhome units will be granted some flexibility from the requirement that 5 different styles of home be provided in that neighborhood and from the requirement that adjacent homes not look alike. In these types of neighborhoods, some consistency between buildings is desired, but it is important to provide some variety with the homes. However, since no home plan has been provided, the City will work with the applicant to determine the extent of this flexibility when a development proposal for that site is submitted. c. PUD flexibility is provided to allow the face of the garage to exceed 55% of the building face and allow up to 60% for detached single family homes and 70% for twinhomes /town homes. d. The intent of the ordinance is to require the side and rear of homes that are located on or visible from public parks or arterial streets to have architectural elements similar to the front elevation. These homes must continue materials and colors from the front elevation to the side and rear elevations. This may be through the use of the same window trim, accent bands or other elements found on the front of the home. Blank, flat elevations with only one siding color or material will not be permitted for these units. 12. The applicant shall provide copies of the final HOA documents /covenants for City review as part of the final plat application. 13. The developer shall provide centralized mailbox locations. A mailbox plan shall be provided for City review and approval. Parking 14. Parking shall be permitted on one side of the local streets and shall be signed in accordance with city standards. 15. No parking shall be permitted on County Road 10. 16. Townhomes (if proposed) shall be required to provide guest parking stalls as required in Section 1060.060, Subd. 8. Landscaping and Lighting 17. A revised landscape plan shall be provided for City Council review prior to approval of the final plat and PUD final plan. The revised plan shall identify the number, location, species and plant sizes and locations to ensure compliance with the Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance. 18. A mix of ornamental trees, perennials and annuals shall also be provided in the medians. 19. The developer shall submit a revised landscape plan for City review and approval of the proposed landscaping in the cul de sac islands to ensure planting materials will withstand the stresses of these locations. Page 3 of 10 City of Corcoran December 11, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 20. The HOA shall be responsible for planting, irrigation and maintenance of the median landscaping and all landscaping within the cul de sac islands. 21. Lawn sprinklers /irrigation systems (if provided) shall all have rain sensors to limit unnecessary watering. 22. The HOA shall be responsible for maintenance of all common lots. 23. The applicant shall work with the City to finalize the design of the decorative lighting that will be installed. The applicant shall provide the street lights in compliance with City Policy. 24. PUD flexibility is granted to allow additional development signage for the two main entrances and sub - association neighborhoods. A master sign plan for the development shall be submitted for City review and approval with the final PUD development plan in compliance with the following standards: a) Up to 3 signs allowed at each entrance. One on each side and one in the median as applicable. b) Sign area is measured by drawing a box around the lettering c) Total signage at the main entrance shall not exceed 80 sq. ft. Individual monument signs shall not exceed 40 sq. ft. d) Total signage at the second entrance shall not exceed 40 sq. ft. Individual monument signs shall not exceed 20 square feet. e) Median signs may be located in the right -of -way, provided the applicant provides an exhibit showing that sight visibility is maintained. f) Monument signs must comply with the minimum 5 -foot setback and be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. g) Illuminated and /or backlit lettering and both downward and upward focused lighting will be allowed so long as the source of light is not visible to drivers and pedestrians. Lighting must comply with the standards in Section 1060.040 and glare, whether direct or reflected, shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. h) Monument signs shall not exceed 8 feet in height, however, median monuments may be allowed up to 11 feet tall. i) Trailhead signage shall be provided where the trails cross public streets and shall be installed in accordance with city standards. Streets, Parking and Utilities 25. All streets within the development shall be public streets. 26. The preliminary plat shall be revised to clearly dimension the required 45 -foot half right -of- way for County Road 10. 27. Utilities shall be stubbed to the property lines for future extension to adjacent properties. The stubs shall be at the developer's expense. 28. A public access for emergency vehicle access and trail connection shall be provided from the long cul de sac (street f) to the northeast street connection. This shall be a 12 -foot wide emergency vehicle access with knockdown bollards and shall also serve as a trail. Page 4 of 10 City of Corcoran December 11, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 29. The development shall comply with the Fire Chief's requirements regarding fire access, fire protection and fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, fire department connections, and fire lane signage. Sidewalks and Trails 30. Sidewalks and trails shall be as shown on the Development Open Space exhibit dated November 21, 2014. a. Trails shall be allowed in the wetland buffer as shown. b. The final location of the sidewalk on Street F shall be determined with the PUD final plan. c. Sidewalks shall be constructed on all public streets, including stub streets, at the time of street construction. d. Sidewalks shall be provided on one side of the public street in the twinhome neighborhood. 31. The HOA or individual homeowners shall be responsible for snow removal on public sidewalks within the development. 32. Sidewalks shall be 5 feet wide. Wetlands 33. Alternative wetland buffers shall be allowed, subject to the standards and conditions in Section 1050.010, Subd. 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. Wetland buffers must be dimensioned on the plans. 34. The plans shall be revised to identify the wetland buffer monuments as required by Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. 35. The developer must install wetland buffer monuments prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for adjacent buildings. Drainage / Stormwater Management 36. Drainage and utility easements must be provided over all wetlands, wetland buffers and ponds. 37. The applicant shall continue to work with the City and adjacent property owners to address the off -site drainage issues as noted in the City Engineer's memo. Offsite stormwater conveyance will be constructed at developer's expense based on wetland and watershed approvals and northerly property owners providing easements. Page 5 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 Shoreland Overlay District December 11, 2014 38. PUD flexibility is granted from the following Shoreland Overlay District standards in Section 1050.020 of the Zoning Ordinance: a. allow more than 25% impervious surface coverage per lot in this area b. allow 35 foot building heights as allowed by the underlying zoning district C. allow 55 -foot wide lots where 75 feet is typically required d. allow a 25 -foot setback from County Road 10 where 50 is required 39. The PUD flexibility is granted based on the finding that: a. The shoreland area within the development is less than 6% of the project area. b. The shoreland area along County Road 10 is separated from the creek by County Road 10 and all drainage is directed north away from the creek. c. The total impervious surface coverage will exceed ordinance requirements for individual lots, but the total impervious coverage within the portions of the overlay district where the creek is located within Outlot A of the development does not exceed the 25% limit. d. The planned development will preserve approximately 40 acres (38% of the site) as permanent open space and has included stormwater management techniques within the development to ensure protection of the shoreland areas. e. The lots do not directly abut County Road 10 and are separated from the road by an outlot. Park Dedication 40. Park dedication shall be a combination of land and cash. The final dedication requirements shall be determined with the final plat for phase I of the development and shall generally be as follows: a. Dedication of off -road trails as shown on the Development Open Space Plan dated November 21, 2014. i. Trails shall be 8 feet wide in 20 -foot easements and credit will be given for the full easement. The emergency access in the northeast corner shall be a 12 -foot trail in 30 -foot easement, but credit for this wider trail shall be given only for the standard 20 -foot width. b. The remainder of the park dedication shall be cash in lieu of land C. The developer shall pave the entrance trail shown between County Road 10 and the large wetland area ( Outlot N) without paving reimbursement. d. Recommended that the developer donate a trail easement on the west side of the project adjacent to the creek. No improvements are required in this easement and no park dedication credit will be provided. e. The park dedication for the trail easements shall be deeded with each phase of development. f. Cash for park dedication shall be paid in full by phase II. g. Credit shall be given for trail paving, if directed by the City. Miscellaneous 41. In addition to the PUD flexibilities already outlined above, the following PUD flexibility standards are approved and shall be incorporated into the development contract: Page 6 of 10 City of Corcoran December 11, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 a. Open Space — The total amount of open space will not be reduced by more than 2.5% or 1 acre from the amount shown in the approved PUD. b. Development Footprint - Total development footprint as identified by street right -of- way and total lotted area cannot increase by more than 1 acre. c. Wetland Buffer - At all times we will not reduce the amount of wetland buffer provided. d. Storm Water - Storm water treatment areas may be modified, provided that the overall treatment standards are still equal to or greater than the standards approved with the Preliminary Plat, as approved by the City Engineer. e. Trails — Any plan must generally provide an east -west and north -south trail link as approved with the PUD Preliminary Plan and while the location of trails may be slightly adjusted the overall locations and length of trails will be honored f. Entrance Location(s) - Main entrance location off CR 10 will remain unchanged. g. Total Units — The total units cannot be less than 235 (3.34 units /acre) and more than 275 (3.91 units /acre) without amending the PUD. h. Association Maintained Housing — Blocks 20, 21 and Outlot O must be maintained and actively marketed for association maintained housing until the final phase is approved. If at that time with active marketing this has not sold, this area may be platted as single family. When the final plat for the first phase of the development is recorded, the developer will list this land for sale, with an independent third party realtor, who will agree to actively market the this property for association maintained housing. The Realtor will also commit to provide the City Administrator with quarterly reports on the efforts being made to market the parcel and market responses. i. Housing Types— Housing /Lot types may change without amending the PUD so long as they meet the approved PUD lot standards and include at least 3 housing /lot types overall. j. Lots and Blocks - Lots sizes may change within the limits approved, however, blocks as arranged need to stay generally consistent with approved Preliminary PUD and Plat. 42. The phasing plan submitted by the developer is approved. 43. A final PUD development plan must submitted with the final plat for review and approval. Page 7 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota VOTING AYE Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 VOTING NAY Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron December 11, 2014 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 11th day of December 2014. EST: 4nie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 8 of 10 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 ATTACHMENT A Legal Description per Title Commitment File No. 37676 December 11, 2014 Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 which was formerly called the Minneapolis Monticello road, excepting therefrom the following described parcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feet of the East 990.00 feet of the South 792.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter said last described point being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet to the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet to the actual point of beginning. Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet to the center line of County Road #10 and to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet to the center line of County Road #10; Page 9 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 December 11, 2014 thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of 205.00 feet more or less to actual point of beginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West to the center line of the road; thence Southeasterly along said center line to an intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the point of beginning; thence North 45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center of County Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point of beginning. Tract B: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerline of Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet to the intersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, to the intersection with said East line; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet to the point of beginning. Tract C: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty -three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty -three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter SE1 /4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 114) distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 114) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE 114) of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property Page 10 of 10 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -290 Motion By: Thomas Seconded By: Asleson December 11. 2014 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT 20400 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 23- 119- 23 -42- 0003) (CITY FILE 14 -027) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Corcoran Zoning Map from RMF -3 (High Density Residential) and UR (Urban Reserve) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with respect to the 103.32 -acre parcel, legally described as follows: See Attachment A Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon adoption of the resolution approving the final PUD development plan for this project. VOTING AYE Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby approved on this 11`h day of December 2014. TEST: anie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 1 of 3 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -290 ATTACHMENT A Legal Description per Title Commitment File No. 37676 December 11. 2014 Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 which was formerly called the Minneapolis Monticello road, excepting therefrom the following described parcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feet of the East 990.00 feet of the South 792.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter said last described point being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet to the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet to the actual point of beginning. Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet to the center line of County Road #10 and to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet to the center line of County Road #10; Page 2 of 3 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO, 2014 -290 December 11, 2014 thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of 205.00 feet more or less to actual point of beginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West to the center line of the road; thence Southeasterly along said center line to an intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the point of beginning; thence North 45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center of County Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point of beginning. Tract B: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerline of Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet to the intersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, to the intersection with said East line; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet to the point of beginning. Tract C: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty -three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty -three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter SE1 /4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property Page 3 of 3 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -74 Motion By: Thomas Seconded By: Asleson December 11, 2014 APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING OF "SAWGRASS" FOR PEACHTREE PARTNERS, LLC ON THE 103 -ACRE SCHENDEL PROPERTY AT 20400 COUNTY ROAD 10 PID 23- 119 -23 -42 -0003) (CITY FILE 14 -027) WHEREAS, Peachtree Partners, LLC ( "the applicant') has requested approval of a rezoning from Urban Reserve (UR) and RMF -3 (High Density Residential) to PUD (planned unit development) for a 103.32 -acre parcel legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcel from Urban Reserve (UR) and RMF -3 (High Density Residential) to PUD; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the request by Peachtree Partners, LLC for the reclassification of the zoning from UR and RMF -3 to PUD for the 103-32 - acre property, based on the following findings: The planned unit development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed density of 3.5 units per acre is within the 3 -5 units per acre expected in the Low Density Residential land use classification and the plan incorporates the trail, infrastructure and street connections anticipated within in the site. 2. The planned development of 246 single family homes is consistent with the intent of an underlying RSF -3 zoning district, which allows a mix of single and two - family homes. The applicant is requesting approval of PUD zoning for design flexibility to provide a mix of lot sizes for this neighborhood at a density consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer will provide both internal infrastructure needed to support their development and trunk infrastructure improvements that will serve a larger development area and well as increased amenities and better neighborhood design than might be expected in a standard subdivision. 4. The planned development is feasible without dependence upon any other subsequent phase. The project has a 3 -5 year phasing plan and development is contingent upon completion of trunk infrastructure improvements. The initial phase will include the construction of the primary project infrastructure, lift station and other key public infrastructure improvement. Page 1 of 4 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -74 December 11, 2014 5. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing public trails consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and a strong pedestrian connection to the existing City park. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve this site at the developer's expense. 6. The planned development is a residential neighborhood developed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore, will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. 7. The quality of the site design proposed by the PUD shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, install and provide more efficient use of streets, utilities and public facilities than may otherwise be expected and create public benefit that is greater than would otherwise be achieved due to the construction and financing of all related infrastructure improvements. The development will meet the City's density goals while preserving 38% of the site as preserved open space maintained by the homeowner's association (much of it wetland and ponding areas, but wooded areas and public trails as well). 8. Adequate infrastructure is available to serve this site if the conditions of PUD preliminary plan and preliminary plat are met. VOTING AYE Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 11th day of December 2014. Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor TEST: City Seal eanie Heinecke — Clerk Page 2 of 4 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -74 ATTACHMENT A Legal Description per Title Commitment File No. 37676 December 11, 2014 Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 which was formerly called the Minneapolis Monticello road, excepting therefrom the following described parcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feet of the East 990.00 feet of the South 792.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter said last described point being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet to the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet to the actual point of beginning. Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet to the center line of County Road #10 and to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet to the center line of County Road #10; Page 3 of 4 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -74 December 11, 2014 thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of 205.00 feet more or less to actual point of beginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West to the center line of the road; thence Southeasterly along said center line to an intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the point of beginning; thence North 45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center of County Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point of beginning. Tract B: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerline of Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet to the intersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, to the intersection with said East line; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet to the point of beginning. Tract C: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty -three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty -three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter SE1 /4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 114) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property Page 4 of 4 N 3 6 ° 1 7 '1 2 " W 1 3 2 . 1 2 N89°36'01"W 2210.00N89°36'01"W 1175.21N 46°43'16" W 26.87 L = 514.30 R = 3545.77 Δ = 8°18'38" N55°01'54"W 449.76 L=111.43 R=1638.52 Δ=3°53'48" S0° 03'25"E 533.00 S89°56'35"W 300.00 S0° 03'25"E 849.88 L = 5 1 3 . 6 7 R = 5 6 9 5 . 7 7 Δ = 5 ° 1 0 '0 2 " N 4 1 ° 2 7'1 4 " W 1 0 8 8.7 3 N46°26'24"E 136.78 S47°18'36"E 226.15 S76°34'36"E 108.90 S29°31'00"W 19.38 S68°58'36"E 125.00 S29°31'00"W 194.15 L=121.16R=445.4 8Δ=15°34'5 8 " N89°28'17"W 62.67 N0°05'35"E 776.35 S89°26'36"E 518.62 N0°05'35"E 1844.37 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > O H P XX X X 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 1 2 3 4 5 2 1 3 1213 6 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 3 2 1 5 4 20 18 17 19 16 15 14 12 13 7 118910 5 6 3 4 2 1 16 151413 17 12111098 7 6543 2 1 14131211768910 54 3 2 1 1211109876543 2 1 9876543 2 1 6543 2 1 1817 16 3 15 14 13 11 12 9 10 8 7 6 5 4 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 9 8 10 11 13 1412 5 13 12 11 10 1 9 8 2 4 7 3 10 9 12 13 14 15 16 7 6 8 18 17 3 5 2 4 1 7 651423 6 7 8 5 3 4 1 2 9 11 12 10 13 22 23 21 15 16 19 18 17 14 1 2 3 4 2 3 1 5 6 4 9 10 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 ROAD A R O A D B ROADC R O A D C ROAD D R O A D D R O A D D R O A D E R O A D F R O A D C R O A D G R O A D F ROAD F ROADI 8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 50 5 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 5 0 5 0 50 50 5 0 50 50 R=60 R = 6 0 R=60 4 2.5 4 2.5 8 5 50 50 45 50 4 5 15 78 910 1211 1314 5 6 1 2 43 4 12 3 7 65 8 9 6 60 BLOCK 1 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AREA/SQ FT 9622.81 6600.00 8117.32 9414.13 9324.28 9456.06 9927.58 9324.28 18462.07 BLOCK 2 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 AREA/SQ FT 6888.93 6868.79 6870.00 7228.45 13996.66 BLOCK 3 LOTS 1 2 3 AREA/SQ FT 9577.29 6600.00 6555.77 BLOCK 4 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AREA/SQ FT 12801.12 7800.00 7800.00 7861.22 10191.41 9170.97 9819.64 11036.15 11036.15 11036.15 11036.15 9499.25 11857.04 7800.00 7800.00 7800.00 10688.85 BLOCK 5 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 AREA/SQ FT 8426.57 8408.40 8162.39 8115.36 8116.42 8116.67 8094.75 8434.39 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 11490.94 12254.40 9351.76 9400.74 9400.74 9392.06 9418.47 9593.00 BLOCK 6 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AREA/SQ FT 7800.00 8867.53 11845.96 8099.13 8735.95 8602.50 8213.01 8368.79 8241.59 8264.84 8405.55 8551.72 8542.12 8731.36 8715.49 8731.44 8719.54 BLOCK 7 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 AREA/SQ FT 10800.00 7968.97 8214.80 8411.96 8411.96 8178.24 8416.29 8416.29 8178.24 8411.96 8411.96 8178.24 8369.50 10435.31 BLOCK 8 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 AREA/SQ FT 10800.00 7992.67 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8167.83 8093.77 8139.34 11768.60 BLOCK 9 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AREA/SQ FT 13529.88 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 8429.28 13130.78 BLOCK 10 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 AREA/SQ FT 11337.18 8542.12 8542.12 8542.12 8542.12 10972.23 BLOCK 11 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 AREA/SQ FT 11827.49 7849.13 8511.08 7430.90 6837.18 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6625.06 7097.93 7214.24 7031.47 7008.01 7533.22 BLOCK 12 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 AREA/SQ FT 6955.94 6694.09 6626.15 6600.00 6600.00 6600.00 6600.56 6995.05 7219.10 7347.32 7282.97 7477.44 7216.39 8881.17 BLOCK 13 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 AREA/SQ FT 14344.11 6598.13 6600.00 7153.05 8635.75 7950.00 6600.00 6600.00 6947.32 7839.14 7302.88 6600.00 11887.02 BLOCK 14 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 AREA/SQ FT 10064.92 6608.18 6600.00 7076.20 7626.67 10088.47 8331.71 7381.80 6875.00 6875.00 7631.70 8240.70 6921.30 6875.00 6875.00 6875.00 7003.18 11565.76 BLOCK 15 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AREA/SQ FT 12795.84 10528.73 9794.09 10986.54 13501.00 18564.66 20182.26 12943.45 BLOCK 16 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 AREA/SQ FT 9774.33 9000.00 9000.00 9000.00 9714.22 10325.89 10000.58 10032.78 9981.76 9981.76 9981.76 10028.68 10179.53 10210.88 9518.60 9651.07 9872.97 9607.32 14267.07 12005.05 12153.70 12755.28 12755.28 BLOCK 17 LOTS 1 2 3 4 AREA/SQ FT 10864.08 9410.60 9437.60 9719.13 BLOCK 18 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 AREA/SQ FT 9607.31 9151.53 9110.96 9387.14 9766.23 9734.70 BLOCK 19 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AREA/SQ FT 12764.38 9127.69 9514.72 9524.09 9347.32 9347.32 9335.57 9928.06 10760.45 10257.83 BLOCK 20 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AREA/SQ FT 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 25296.60 BLOCK 21 LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 AREA/SQ FT 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 2400.00 86862.68 OUTLOTS OUTLOTS A B C D E F G H I J K L M N AREA/SQ FT 5925.89 40838.20 176255.78 21389.72 29963.80 121212.65 37356.73 43657.01 25210.32 4651.98 3148.77 87208.31 12569.93 599409.89 O P Q R 29140.02 8721.41 4168.36 22166.73 S T U V 3735.93 150350.58 69626.26 1930.08 W14606.59 X Y Z 566.02 64585.73 51585.74 AA 2666.70 OUTLOTS OUTLOTS AREA/SQ FT OUTLOTS OUTLOTS AREA/SQ FT SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO. WA S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , O R R E P O R T AN D T H A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D UN D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F P R I N T N A M E : SI G N A T U R E : DA T E : LI C . N O . REVISION CHECKED Pl o t D a t e : 1 1 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 4 - 1 1 : 3 5 a m Dr a w i n g n a m e : V : \ 1 9 3 8 \ m i s c e l l a n e o u s \ 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 \ C A D \ D w g \ 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 V 4 0 1 . d w g Xr e f s : , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X S P V , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X B R D , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X S X V , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X S X T , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 V 3 0 1 T O P O , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X S X W , 1 9 3 8 0 2 5 7 7 X S X V 2 0 0 S C A L E TH E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L V E R I F Y A N D B E R E S P O N S I B L E F O R A L L D I M E N S I O N S . D O N O T S C A L E T H E DR A W I N G - A N Y E R R O R S O R O M I S S I O N S S H A L L B E R E P O R T E D T O S T A N T E C W I T H O U T D E L A Y . TH E C O P Y R I G H T S T O A L L D E S I G N S A N D D R A W I N G S A R E T H E P R O P E R T Y O F S T A N T E C . R E P R O D U C T I O N OR U S E F O R A N Y P U R P O S E O T H E R T H A N T H A T A U T H O R I Z E D B Y S T A N T E C I S F O R B I D D E N . PE A C H T R E E P A R T N E R S SA W G R A S S , C O R C O R A N , M N 193802577 N 0 200400 Legal Description per Title Commitment File No. 37676 Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 which was formerly called the Minneapolis Monticello road, excepting therefrom the following described parcels (Parcels 1 through 7): Parcel 1: The East 471.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 2: The West 518.60 feet of the East 990.00 feet of the South 792.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 3: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter said last described point being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet to the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet to the actual point of beginning. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SAWGRASS Land Surveyor: Linda H. Brown Stantec Consulting 3717 23rd Street South St. Cloud, MN 56301 320-229-5535 Owner/Developer: Peachtree Partners David Newman 1521 94th Lane NE Minneapolis, MN 55449 763-792-8975 Current Zoning - UR (Urban Reserve) and RMF-3 High Density Residential Proposed Zoning - PUD (Planned Unit Development) Total Acreage of Plat = 103.32 Acres+/- E. LINE OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119 R23 SURVEY LINE PER HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 10, PLAT 8 NE CORNER OF THE NE1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 NE CORNER OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 (BROKEN PK NAIL) E. LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 SE CORNER OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 (HENNEPIN CTY CIM) S. LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 SW CORNER OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 23, T119, R23 CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD #10 66.00 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY FOR C.S.A.H. 10 PER DOC. NO. 3867013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1718 19 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B OUTLOT C OUTLOT D O U T L O T E O U T L O T F O U T L O T G OUTLOTH OUTLOT I 11 OUTLOT O O U T L O T P OU T L O T M OUTLOT N VICINITY & ZONING MAP C.S.A.H.10 C.S.A.H.50 SITE ZONED UR ZONED RMF-3 Parcel 4: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 5: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet to the center line of County Road #10 and to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet to the center line of County Road #10; thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of 205.00 feet more or less to actual point of beginning. Parcel 6: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West to the center line of the road; thence Southeasterly along said center line to an intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the point of beginning; thence North 45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Parcel 7: Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center of County Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point of beginning. Tract B: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerline of Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet to the intersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, to the intersection with said East line; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet to the point of beginning. Tract C: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty-three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty-three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property V4.01 PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T MM REH LHB LHB SU R V E Y O R MI N N E S O T A LI N D A H . B R O W N 2 3 6 8 2 SEE SHEET V4.02 FOR LEGEND OUTLOTK OUTLOT L O U T L O T Z OUTLOT R OUTLOT Q OUTLOT S OUTLOT Y OUTLOT T OUTLOT U O U T L O T V OUTLOT W OUTLOT X O U T L O T A A 20 21 O U T L O T J 1OUTLOT/EASEMENT11/19/14 NOTE: ALL PONDS, WETLANDS, AND WETLAND BUFFERS WILL BE PLATTED IN OUTLOTS AND DEDICATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN THE FINAL PLAT. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: January 17, 2018 for the January 25, 2018 City Council Meeting RE: Discussion of dog kennel standards 60-Day Review Deadline: N/A 1.Application Request The Council recently expressed some concern about the number of dog kennels in the community and directed staff to bring the item to the Planning Commission for discussion. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission discussed dog kennel standards at their October 5, 2017 and January 4, 2018 meetings. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council consider the following changes: •Allow Dog Kennels as an IUP or CUP with standards •Establish a minimum lot size •Establish minimum setbacks •Establish a minimum height for fencing 3.Context The Corcoran City Code identifies two different types of kennels: •COMMERCIAL KENNEL. A structure or premises where dogs are kept or possessed for the business of boarding, breeding, grooming and or training for profit. •HOBBY KENNEL. A structure or premises that is located in a residential area that is not operated as a business for the sale, breeding, grooming, boarding, or training but rather as a hobby. Wherein the dogs are kept exclusively as personal/family pets. Kennel licensing requirements in Corcoran are limited to the standards in Section 81.09 (KENNEL LICENSING REQUIREMENTS): COMMERCIAL KENNEL – The Home Occupation Ordinance shall govern any commercial activity involving dogs including, but not limited to, breeding, sales, grooming, or boarding. Agenda Item: 9e. Ordinance Amendment – Dog Kennels (City File 17-037) 2 January 17, 2018 All commercial kennels shall be required to apply for an Interim Use Permit for the Conditional Home Occupation License (CHOL), as described in the Zoning Ordinance. HOBBY KENNEL LICENSE – Person’s owning four (4) or more dogs over six months of age, whom are not involved in commercial activity must obtain a hobby license. The fee for said license shall be set from time to time by city council resolution. The premises shall have a secure fenced area of at least thirty-five (35) square feet per dog and shelter from the weather. The dogs shall be fed and watered properly so as to maintain a healthy condition. A site inspection by the city councils duly authorized agent shall be done to assure compliance with such standards. A CHOL is processed as an interim use permit (IUP) and is subject to the general PUD standards as well. However, the Zoning Ordinance also allows commercial kennels as an Interim Use Permit in the UR and RR zoning districts, as a Conditional Use Permit in the CR (Rural Commercial) district and as a use accessory to a Veterinary Clinic or Animal Hospital conditional use in the C-1 and C-2 districts. No additional standards beyond those listed above are provided. A review of the current home occupation listings and planning files shows that there are currently four dog kennels in town: a. Clipperton’s dog kennel at 10800 Trail Haven Road b. Linder dog training at 19508 County Circle East c. Red Barn Retreat pet kennel at 19520 Stieg Road d. Good Dogs Minnesota pet kennel at 10220 Trail Haven Road 4. Analysis of Request Staff reviewed several cities in the region to understand how other communities address dog kennels. None of the cities limit the number of dog kennels in the community, but they do generally limit the districts where such use is allowed and provide development standards. Limiting the districts where such uses are allowed and/or increasing the development standards could discourage these uses. The following standards are recommended based on staff’s research of similar city standards and the Planning Commission discussion: • Amend the ordinance to make commercial dog kennels an interim use permit in the UR and RR districts and keep commercial kennels as a conditional use permit in the CR district. Interim use permits are different from conditional use permits as they have a “sunset clause” and do not run with the land. This means that a dog kennel interim use permit could not be transferred through a change in ownership of the residential property. A new IUP would be required if the property and business was sold. Ordinance Amendment – Dog Kennels (City File 17-037) 3 January 17, 2018 • Staff recommends adding a condition for kennels that are allowed in the UR and RR districts as interim use permits, requiring the applicant to live on the property where the kennel facility is located. Employees may be allowed subject to the approval of the City Council. • Require a minimum lot size of three acres for the commercial kennel in any district. • Require any commercial dog kennel to be set back 50 ft. from all property lines. This would include structures, fences, and any other accessory uses used in the business. • Move the fence requirement from Section 81.09 to the interim use and conditional use standards for the applicable districts. (“The premises shall have a secure fenced area of at least thirty-five (35) square feet per dog and shelter from the weather.”). Recommended to add a height requirement for the fence to be a minimum of five feet tall. • Move the dog care requirement from Section 81.09 to the interim use and conditional use standards for the applicable districts. (“The dogs shall be fed and watered properly so as to maintain a healthy condition.”). If the Council does not think the proposed changes are needed or that other changes are needed, they should provide direction to staff. Staff estimates the effort to complete this work to be $1,500- 2,500. 5. Recommendation City Council should direct staff to proceed with drafting an amendment to the Corcoran City Code. Planning Commission could hold a public hearing for the ordinance amendment at their April 5th meeting for Council action on April 26th. Attachments a. Dog Kennel Research Memo Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 DATE September 26, 2017 FROM Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, AICP TO Corcoran Planning Commission CC RE Dog Kennel Ordinance Research Dog Kennel Ordinance Research Plymouth – regulates dog kennels by separating them into commercial dog kennels and private dog kennels. • A commercial dog kennel is defined as any premise requiring a kennel license. o Commercial dog kennels are allowed in the Future Restricted Development District (FRD) by interim use permit. Commercial kennels are also allowed as an accessory use to a veterinary clinic in the commercial districts. They are also allowed in the General Industrial District (I-2) by conditional use permit subject to the standards in Subd. 9. • A private dog kennel is defined as an outside area designed, intended, or used specifically for the keeping of dogs, including fenced dog runs and enclosures, dog houses, and the like. o Private dog kennels are considered an accessory use and the associated structures are only allowed in rear or side yards. “Subd. 9. Except as may be allowable by interim use permit in the FRD district, commercial dog kennels are prohibited in the City.” “Pursuant to Section 21120 of this Chapter, accessory buildings and structures including, but not limited to, sheds, play and recreational facilities, private dog kennels” “Subd. 9. Dog day/overnight boarding use, provided that: The dog daycare/overnight boarding business is located at least 500 feet from any residential property line. An eight-foot high solid fence is constructed to fully enclose any outdoor play areas. Dogs are kept indoors for overnight boarding. A kennel license is obtained for the site, pursuant to Section 915 of the City Code.” “Subd. 7. Kennel License. No person shall conduct any business of selling, boarding, breeding, treating, or grooming animals without obtaining a kennel license. Kennel licenses shall be issued on an annual basis and shall be made for the whole or unexpired portion of the year ending on December 31 next following the effective date of the license. The fee for the kennel license shall be as provided in Chapter X.” Medina – regulates dog kennels by separating them into commercial kennels and private kennels. • Private kennels are required to go through an administrative permit process for less than five dogs. When seeking approval for more than five dogs the private kennel license must be approved by city council. Memorandum 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net MEMORANDUM 2 • Commercial kennels are allowed in the Business District (B), Commercial Highway District (CH), Commercial Highway/Railroad District (CH-RR), Commercial General District (CG), Mixed Use Commercial District (MU), and Commercial Neighborhood District (CN) by conditional use permit. They are allowed in the Agricultural Preservation District (AG) as a permitted accessory use. The conditional use permit for commercial kennels must go through planning commission with a public hearing who makes a recommendation to the city council which takes action. “Section 343. 07. Commercial Kennel. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to operate a Commercial Kennel within the City except as allowed in Chapter 8 of the Medina City Code. Section 343.09. Private Kennel Licenses. A person who seeks to own, harbor, keep, or allow more than the number of dogs specified in Section 343.05 on a property shall apply for a private kennel license.” Maple Grove – regulates dog kennels by separating them into commercial kennels and private kennels. • Private kennels are allowed in all residential districts with a private kennel license. A private kennel is considered a place housing three dogs’ incidental to the occupancy of the premises. A private kennel is allowed in all zoning districts. • Commercial kennels are allowed in the Business District (B) as a permitted use and the Freeway Frontage District (FF) only as part of a mixed use development. Both require a commercial dog kennel license. Both types of licenses have a $75 fee to get licensed. City code does not state a review process for the applications. “(1) A commercial dog kennel or cat shelter must be licensed by the city. This shall include, but not be limited to, pet shops, animal hospitals, grooming facilities, dog kennels, cat shelters, and other similar operations. Such operations shall only be located in the B zoning and FF zoning districts. (2) A premises located in a residential zoning district and where a total of three cats over the age of six months are kept shall be licensed to have a private cat shelter, unless the land upon which the cats are kept is eligible to be classified or is classified as "Green Acres" land (3) A premises other than a commercial dog kennel or cat shelter located in any zoning district and where a total of three dogs over the age of six months are kept shall be licensed to have a private kennel license.” “(f) Commercial dog kennels or cat shelters. The maintaining of a commercial dog kennel or cat shelter is prohibited in all areas of the city except areas zoned commercial.” Hugo – regulates dog kennels by considering them commercial kennels. They are subject to different standards based on the zoning district where they are located. Commercial kennels are considered a permitted accessory use in the Agricultural District (AG). In the General Industrial District (I-3), Long-term Agricultural District (LA), Restricted Commercial District (RC-1), and Future Urban Service District (FUS), commercial kennels are considered a conditional use. All commercial kennels are subject to the standards listed below in the performance standards section. “Sec. 90-236. - Kennels—Commercial. (a) It is unlawful for any person to construct or operate a commercial kennel, except in conformance with this chapter and chapter 14 of this Code. (b) Commercial kennels that have the facilities to house, maintain, or keep four or more animals, must have their principal entrance located on a state highway, county road, or city commercial collector street. (c) The minimum lot size for a commercial kennel in the agricultural zoning district is five acres. MEMORANDUM 3 (d) All structures, pens, fences, or other materials used for the confinement, care, or breeding of animals shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from any residential property line and 50 feet from any water supply well. (e) Adequate sewage disposal, through either an individual sewage treatment system or the municipal sewage system, shall be provided to handle all human and animal waste for the facility.” Rogers – regulates dog kennels by considering any place that houses three or more dogs to be a dog kennel. It breaks apart kennels into two types, commercial and residential. • Commercial kennels are kennels where the purpose is selling, breeding, treating or grooming as the primary function. Commercial kennels are considered a conditional use in the Rural Estate District (RE- 2), Rural Estate District (RE-5), Agricultural District (AG), Retail Business District (B-1), Commercial Business District (B-2), Limited Industry District (L-I), and Highway Business District (B-3). Commercial kennels must apply for a conditional use permit that is review by Planning Commission with a public hearing who makes a recommendation to the city council who takes action. • Residential kennels are defined as kennels zoned and occupied for residential purposes, and where the keeping of such dogs or cats is incidental to the occupancy of the premises for residential purposes. Residential kennels are considered a permitted use in the Rural Estate District (RE-2), Rural Estate District (RE-5), Agricultural District (AG), and Single-Family Residential District (R-2). Residential kennels must apply for a residential kennel license which is reviewed by city council. “(2) Kennels, commercial. a. Reserved. b. Performance standards. Commercial kennels must comply with all of the following standards: 1. The minimum lot area required for commercial kennels is ten acres. 2. The confinement, care or breeding of animals shall be within an enclosed structure and shall be setback a minimum of 100 feet from any property line and 50 feet from any water supply well. 3. Every commercial kennel facility, or portion thereof, where the public is served shall be provided sanitary facilities in accordance with the regulations of the Uniform Building Code of Minnesota and Hennepin County SSTS regulations. (3) Kennels, residential. a. A residential kennel license shall be required by the city for a residential kennel in all districts where permitted. The city council shall take into consideration the kind and number of animals kept or to be kept on the premises, the facilities being maintained for the care and keeping of the animals, the effect of the animals on neighboring properties, and the general health and welfare of the city.” White Bear Lake – regulates dog kennels by considering any place that houses four or more dogs to be a dog kennel. Dog kennels are considered a conditional use in all zoning districts and must follow the applicable conditional use permit procedures which require a public hearing at planning commission who makes a recommendation to city council who takes action. An annual $50 fee is also charged to the dog kennels. “§701.150 DOGS; KENNELS; LICENSE REQUIRED. No person shall operate a dog kennel within the City of White Bear Lake unless he shall pay the City Clerk a license fee of Twenty-Five Dollars ($25.00) and submit an application stating therein the maximum number of dogs to be harbored in the kennel, the exact location of the kennel and the qualification and experience of the applicant in the operation of a dog kennel. The City Council shall grant or deny the license. (Ref. §1301.180, Code 1966; Ord. No. 648, 1/13/81)” MEMORANDUM 4 “Subd. 3. Dog Kennels. Dog kennels as defined in Section 1301.030 are conditional uses in all zoning districts (requires a conditional use permit based on the procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1301.050 of this Code) provided that: a) Minimum lot size of one (1) acre is required. b) All the provisions of Section 1302.130, Subd. 2 must be complied with. c) Any building in which animals are kept shall not be closer than fifty (50) feet from any lot line.” St. Michael – regulates dog kennels by considering any place that houses two or more dogs to be a dog kennel. It breaks up dog kennels into two types, commercial and residential. • A residential kennel is considered any place where two or more dogs are kept on premises which are zoned and occupied for residential purposes, and where the keeping of such dogs is incidental to the occupancy of the premises for residential purposes. A residential kennel must apply for a license that is reviewed by administration. • A commercial kennel is a place with two or more dogs where the business of raising, selling, boarding, breeding, showing, or grooming of dogs or other animals is conducted. A commercial kennel is considered a conditional use and must apply for CUP to be allowed. They are only allowed General Business District (B-1) and General Agriculture District (A-1) districts. “§ 90.03 - KENNEL LICENSES. No person may operate a residential or commercial kennel in the city without first obtaining a kennel license as provided in this section. Application for the license shall be made to the City Clerk and shall expire on December 31, of each odd year. The City Council may impose conditions upon the granting of any commercial or residential kennel license. (A) No person may operate a residential kennel in this city without first obtaining a residential kennel license as provided in this section. Application for the license shall be made to the City Clerk and must be accompanied by the license fee set forth by City Council. (B) When an application is made for a residential kennel license a letter will be mailed to all neighboring property owners. The letter will notify these property owners of the application and request any feedback regarding the application. Whether or not all of the occupants of abutting property approve the application, the city may grant or deny the license. The license may not be granted unless the city finds that the use of the applicant’s premises as a residential kennel will not have, or will not be likely to have, any adverse effect upon neighboring properties or the occupancy thereof, and will not constitute a nuisance to the neighborhood. (C) Residential or commercial kennel licenses may be revoked by the city by reason of any violation of this chapter or by reason of violation of any other provision of this code or any order, law or regulation. (D) Before revoking a residential or commercial kennel license, the licensee shall be given notice of the meeting at which such revocation will be considered, and if the licensee is present at such meeting the licensee must be given an opportunity to be heard. Notice of the meeting shall be given to the licensee in writing. Written notice shall be mailed to the address of the licensee as set forth in the licensee’s application for the kennel license. (E) The fee for a residential or commercial kennel license shall be set forth by City Council from time to time. The residential kennel license fee is in addition to the usual animal license fees provided in this chapter, if applicable. (F) Kennels shall be maintained in a clean and healthful condition at all times and shall be open to inspection by any agent on behalf of the city, at all reasonable times. (Ord. 0303, passed 4-8-03) § 90.04 - COMMERCIAL KENNEL. MEMORANDUM 5 A commercial kennel shall only be permitted in the B-1 General Business District or the A-1 Zoning District with a Conditional Use Permit. A Conditional Use Permit shall allow a commercial kennel in the B-1 General Business District as set forth by the regulations in § 155.208. A Conditional Use Permit shall allow a commercial kennel in the A-1 zoning district as set forth by the regulations § 155.118(A)(5). The required Conditional Use Permit is based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by § 155.440. An exception shall be made to this requirement for any veterinary clinic.” Elk River – regulates dog kennels by considering any place that houses three or more dogs to be a dog kennel. It breaks up dog kennels into two types, commercial and private. • A commercial kennel is one that is used to board, train and breed dogs for compensation. A commercial kennel is allowed in the Single-Family Residential (R-1), Central Business District (C-1), Light Industrial District(I-1), and Medium Industrial District (I-2), it is considered a conditional use requiring a CUP. • A private kennel is a premise where more than three dogs are kept or harbored but not for commercial use. A private kennel is allowed as an accessory or permitted use in residential districts R-1 and R-2, both require an administrative permit. Permits for the kennels require annual renewal. • Both types of kennels are subject to the standards for kennels in Section 10.84. “(b) Issuance. No person shall operate a commercial or private kennel in the city without first obtaining a permit. Application for such permit shall be made to the city administrator and shall be accompanied by the permit fee. Such a permit shall be issued upon a showing of compliance with all laws and ordinances.” Section 10.84 – Standards for Kennels. “(a) Private and commercial kennel facilities shall be structurally sound and maintained in good repair. Indoor housing facilities should be adequately ventilated and have ample light and heat, either natural or artificial. (b) Animals kept outside shall be provided with access to shelter to protect them from the sun, rain, and snow, together with adequate bedding when the temperature falls below 50 degrees Fahrenheit. (c) If animals are confined by chains, such chains shall be so attached that they cannot become entangled with the chains of other animals or any other objects. Chains shall be of a size commonly used for the size of animals involved and shall be attached to the animal by means of a well-fitted collar. Such chain shall be at least three times the length of the animal as measured from the tip of its nose to the base of its tail. (d) Enclosures shall be of sufficient size to allow each animal to turn around fully and stand, sit, and lie in a comfortable normal position. The floors of the enclosure shall be constructed so as to prevent injury to the animal's legs and feet. (e) The temperature for indoor housing facilities shall not be allowed to fall below 50 degrees Fahrenheit for animals not accustomed to lower temperatures. (f) Disposal facilities shall be provided to minimize vermin, infestation, odors and disease hazards. (g) Adequate storage and refrigeration shall be provided to protect food supplies against contamination and deterioration.” 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: January 17, 2018 for the January 25, 2018 City Council Meeting RE: Discussion of animals in commercial districts 60-Day Review Deadline: N/A 1.Application Request Staff has researched animals in commercial districts in response to complaints and questions from local businesses. There is some interest from Heidi’s Lifestyle Garden to keep bees and chickens as part of the commercial operations. That property is zoned C-1. 2.Analysis of Request Chapter 81 of the City Code regulates animals and the Zoning Ordinance allows animals (as regulated by Chapter 81) in all of the residential zoning districts and the Transitional Rural Commercial District. The ordinance does not allow animals in any commercial or industrial districts, except that Commercial Kennels are allowed as a principal use in the UR, RR and CR districts and as an accessory use to veterinary clinics and animal hospitals in the C-1 and C-2 districts. The Corcoran City Code identifies animals in two ways: F ARM ANIMALS. Shall mean those animals commonly associated with a farm or performing work in an agricultural setting. Unless otherwise defined, such animals shall include members of the equestrian family (horses, mules), bovine family (cows, bulls), sheep, poultry (chicken, turkeys), fowl (ducks, geese), swine (including Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs), goats, bees, and other animals associated with a farm, ranch, or stable. AGRICULTURAL USE: The production, for sale, of livestock, dairy animals, dairy products, poultry, or poultry products, fur-bearing animals, horticultural or nursery stock, fruit, vegetables, forage, grains, timber, trees or bees and apiary products. Animals as defined in Chapter 81 of the City Code are allowed based on the size of the property, with a property size of one half acre being the minimum size required to keep animals. The number of animals allowed on a property are computed based on the size of the property and are referred to as an Animal Unit Equivalent (AUE). Each animal kept on a property contributes to this unit depending on the species of animal. A fenced in area and shelter or stabling facility is required when keeping animals on a property. Agenda Item: 9f. Ordinance Amendment – Animals in Commercial Districts (City File 17-038) 2 January 17, 2018 Staff reviewed several cities in the region to understand how other communities address animals in commercial districts. Most of the cities reviewed did not allow animals in any commercial district. A few cities allow animals in rural commercial districts similar to Corcoran. There are some potential issues associated with allowing animals in commercial districts: Noise, smell, appearance and space restrictions are all potential issues with allowing animals in commercial districts. These are all factors to consider given the close proximity of adjacent properties in commercial districts. If the Council wishes to allow animals in commercial districts, staff would recommend developing standards to address what animals would be allowed in commercial districts and if it should be limited to an accessory use for certain kinds of businesses. Staff would also recommend establishing setback, lot size, structure and fence standards for these types of uses. 3. Recommendation The Council should provide direction to the Planning Commission about whether changes are needed to the standards and, if so, recommendations about how those standards should be modified. Attachments a. Research Memo regarding Animals in Commercial Districts COPYRIGHT 2014 LANDFORM Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.L A N D F O R M 1 Code Update - Animals in Commercial Districts DATE 10/18/17 PROJECT NAME Corcoran Code - Animals in Commercial Districts PROJECT NUMBER COR17015.GEN PROJECT LOCATION Corcoran , MN BY Kevin Shay City Definitions Ordinance Language Allowed Commercial Districts Corcoran, MN Farm Animals. Shall mean those animals commonly associated with a farm or performing work in an agricultural setting. Unless otherwise defined, such animals shall include members of the equestrian family (horses, mules), bovine family (cows, bulls), sheep, poultry (chicken, turkeys), fowl (ducks, geese), swine (including Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs), goats, bees, and other animals associated with a farm, ranch, or stable. Agricultural Use: The production, for sale, of livestock, dairy animals, dairy products, poultry, or poultry products, fur-bearing animals, horticultural or nursery stock, fruit, vegetables, forage, grains, timber, trees or bees and apiary products. Adhere to the following requirements at a minimum: 1. Properties of less than 3 acres, but at least one-half acre, are allowed to have .5 Animal Unit Equivalent per acre. 2. Minimum of 2 acres is required to allow one Animal Unit Equivalent to be kept. 3. For each additional whole acre over 3 acres, one additional Animal Unit Equivalent is permitted. Partial acres on parcels greater than three acres do not increase the available Animal Unit Equivalents. There are no animal unit restrictions on parcels greater than 30 acres. 4. For the purpose of calculating acreage under this section, adjoining parcels under the same ownership shall be considered one parcel if actually used together for the keeping of the Animal Unit Equivalents. 5. For the purpose of calculating acreage under this section, adjoining parcels not under the same ownership may be combined if: a. The adjoining property owner agrees to allow his/her property to be used for this purpose; b. The agreement is in writing and contains the following: i. Names of both landowners and the addresses and legal descriptions of their respective properties; ii. A statement indicating the amount of acreage the adjoining property owner is allowing the animal owner to utilize for this purpose; iii. A statement indicating the duration of the agreement; iv. An acknowledgment by the adjoining property owner that the agreement reduces the available Animal Unit Equivalent, if any, on his/her property for the duration of the agreement; and v. The signatures of all property owners of record for all parcels involved. c. The agreement shall be filed with the City Administrator. 6. All animals must be kept in an enclosed pen or corral with fences or enclosures of sufficient size, height and strength to ensure safe and humane retention of animals. 7. In addition to the pen required on number 6, a shelter or stabling facility shall be provided of at least 100 square feet per animal unit. The shelter or facility shall be at least 75 feet from any residential structure of another person and must comply with all setback requirements as identified in Section 1030.020 (Accessory Buildings) of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Manure, bedding compost and other waste materials must not be piled or allowed to accumulate closer than 75 feet from any lot line and 140 feet from neighboring residences. On parcels less than 3 acres, such materials shall be removed from the premises at least once within a six (6) month period, unless the materials are Allowed Accessory Use: Transitional Rural Commercial (TSR) Medina, MN Animal Unit. A unit of measure that determines the number of livestock or traditional farm animals that are allowed on certain parcels. (b) Livestock or traditional farm animals are permitted on properties two acres or larger at a maximum density of one animal unit for the first two Grazable Acres of land and one additional animal unit for each Grazable Acre of land thereafter. For properties less than two acres, the maximum number of animal units shall be 0.1 (c) Property owners shall be responsible for management and proper disposal of all animal waste. (d) The number of permitted animals shall be determined by the following table: One domestic chicken/duck or similar fowl = 0.01 Permitted Use: Rural Commercial Holding (RCH) Elk River, MN Animals, agricultural, mean animals which are used for the production of food or other products. Agricultural animals shall include cattle, hogs, bees, sheep, goats, chickens, turkeys, horses, and other animals commonly accepted as farm animals in the state. The keeping of agricultural animals in the A1 and R-1a zoning district is a permitted use on parcels which are five acres or larger and a conditional use on parcels which are smaller than five acres. In the R-1b, R-1c, and R-1d districts, the keeping of agricultural animals is a conditional use and shall be limited to parcels which are five acres or larger. Not allowed in any commercial districts Hugo, MN Agriculture means the production of livestock, dairy animals, dairy products, poultry or poultry products, fur- bearing animals, horticultural or nursery stock, fruit, vegetables, forages, grains, timber, trees, or bees and apiary products. The term also includes wetlands, pasture, forest land, wildlife land, and other uses that depend on the inherent productivity of the land. (b) Domestic livestock and poultry may be kept or maintained in the agricultural, long-term agricultural, future urban service, and rural residential zoning districts on parcels of land of five acres or more in size. Two animal units shall be allowed for the first five acres of land, and one additional animal unit shall be allowed for each acre of land in excess of five acres. On parcels of land less than five acres in the agricultural, long-term agricultural, future urban service, and rural residential zoning districts, up to five chickens may be kept or maintained, all of which may not be roosters. For the purposes of this subsection (b), the following conditions shall apply: (1) Adjacent parcels of land under common ownership may be combined to determine the maximum number of animal units allowed, if the parcels are operated as a single enterprise. (2) In instances where a parcel of land consists of a fraction of an acre, the property size shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number to determine the number of animal units allowed. (c) The Comparison of Livestock Units table, shows the animal units for common domestic livestock. For all other livestock, the animal units will be computed by dividing the average weight of the animal by 1,000 pounds. Not allowed in any commercial districts COPYRIGHT 2014 LANDFORM Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.L A N D F O R M 2 City Definitions Ordinance Language Allowed Commercial Districts Maple Grove, MN Farm, hobby, means a tract of land of less than ten acres in size, with a house and accessory buildings, on which crops and often livestock are raised. The hobby farm shall not qualify for exemptions provided in this chapter for farms. Agricultural uses means those uses commonly associated with the growing of produce on farms. These include field crop farming; pasture for hay; fruit growing; tree, plant, shrub or flower nurseries; truck gardening; roadside stands for sale in season of products grown on the premises; and livestock raising and feeding; but do not include fur farms, commercial animal feedlots and kennels. Raising honeybees . The keeping or maintaining of honeybees is prohibited in areas within the city zoned R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5. R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5 district regulations . The keeping and maintaining of animals in the R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5 zoning districts shall be limited to the keeping and maintaining of those animals which are commonly known as traditional house pets which would normally be housed in the residences of their owners. B district regulations . The keeping and maintaining of animals in the B zoning district shall be limited to security animals and animals in commercial kennels, pet shops, pet hospitals or pet grooming shops. I district regulations. The keeping and maintaining of animals in the I zoning district shall be limited to keeping and maintaining security animals. Not allowed in any commercial districts Plymouth, MN Farm Animals. Cattle, hogs, potbelly pigs, bees, sheep, goats, chickens, turkeys, horses (including miniatures) and other animals commonly accepted as farm animals in the State of Minnesota. Subd. 4. Except as provided in the FRD district, farm animals (including miniatures) are prohibited in the City. Furthermore, any pen, pasture, paddock, feedlot or building designed to confine a farm animal shall be located not less than one hundred (100) feet away from any residential dwelling that is not owned or leased by the person owning the farm animal. Subd. 5. Animals being kept as part of the Minnesota Zoological Gardens, St. Paul Como Zoo, or similar institutional docent programs are an allowed use in all zoning districts by administrative permit. Prior to permit issuance, the participant in the program shall notify the Zoning Administrator in writing of their participation in the program and identify all animals being kept. Subd. 6. No animal feedlots shall exceed six (6) animal units as defined by Minnesota Rules 7020.0300, Subd. 5. (Amended by Ord. No. 2009-07, 05/12/09) Subd. 7. Animals may only be kept for commercial purposes if authorized in the zoning district where the animals are located. Subd. 8. Animals may not be kept if they cause a nuisance as defined by the City Code or endanger the health or safety of the community. Not allowed in any commercial districts Rogers, MN Agricultural use: Land whose use is devoted to the production of horticulture and nursery stock, fruit of all kinds, vegetables, forage, grains, bees and apiary products and raising domestic farm animals. This activity does not need to be the principal source of income. Animals, domestic farm: Cattle, hogs, horses, bees, sheep, goats, chickens and other animals commonly kept for commercial food producing purposes. 2. The following equivalents shall apply when determining animal units: chicken = 0.1 For animals not listed above, the number of animal units shall be defined as the average weight of the animal divided by 1,000 pounds. 3. Livestock shall be kept only in densities as allowed in the zoning district in which a parcel is located. The keeping of livestock in greater density than allowed as stated above and/or as allowed in the zoning district shall require a conditional use permit. Not allowed in any commercial districts St. Michael, MN Agricultural Use. The use of land for the growing and/or production of field crops, livestock, and livestock products for the production of income including, but not limited to, the following: (1) Field crops, including: barley, soybeans, corn, hay, oats, potatoes, rye, sorghum, and sunflowers; (2) Livestock, including: dairy and beef cattle, goats, horses, sheep, hogs, poultry, game birds, and other animals such as ponies, deer, and mink; (3) Livestock products, including: milk, butter, cheese, eggs, fur, and honey. (B) Livestock and other animals. (1) Livestock, poultry, and farm animals shall only be kept on any residential lots or parcels of at least four acres in size or in an agricultural district of the city. Animals shall be allowed at a maximum density of .50 animal unit per acre. These restrictions shall not apply to normal farm operations existing prior to the adoption of this chapter. Livestock shall include those animals listed in division (A)(2) above under the definition of "agricultural use." (2) In the zoning districts identified in division (B)(1) above, on parcels over four acres in size, animals and the permitted animal density shall be governed by any applicable Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regulation and the city’s feedlot ordinance as may be amended from time to time. Not allowed in any commercial districts White Bear Lake, MN Domestic-Farm. Cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, roosters, turkeys, horses and other commonly accepted farm animals. (Ref. Ord. 1085, 5/14/13; Ref. Ord. 16-04-2011, 4/12/16) Domestic-Hobby. Pigeons and bees. (See Municipal Code Section 702.043 and 702.045, respectively.) (Ref. Ord. 1085, 5/14/13) Subd. 1. General. Except as otherwise provided for in this Code, or other City regulations, all domestic house pet animals shall be allowed as permitted uses in any zoning district and domestic farm animals may be considered as conditional uses, provided they are maintained on an existing farm property. Horses may be kept in the "O" zoning district, on property not used for farming, provided they are sheltered or corralled at a distance of not less than two hundred (200) feet from an adjoining residential property. The ratio of horses to lot acreage shall not exceed one horse for every two and one-half (2-1/2) acres of land, unless a conditional use permit is first obtained by the owner. (Ref. Ord. 16-07-2015, 7/12/16) In all districts, the governing body may order the owner or occupier of any property to apply for a conditional use permit to keep non-domestic wild animals, including existing uses, provided it is found by the governing body that the use may pose a threat to the public health, safety, convenience or general welfare. It is also recognized that the ability to cultivate one’s own food is a sustainable activity that can also be a rewarding pastime. Therefore, it is also the purpose and intent of this ordinance to permit the keeping and maintenance of hens in a clean and sanitary manner that is not a nuisance to or detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of the community. It is the purpose and intent of this ordinance to permit the keeping of bees, as a hobby, subject to regulations hereinafter set forth. It is recognized that the ability to cultivate one’s own food is a sustainable activity that can also be a rewarding pastime, and that gentle strains of honey bees can be maintained within populated areas without causing a nuisance if carefully managed. Therefore, it is also the purpose and intent of this ordinance to permit the keeping of bees in such ways that is not a nuisance to or detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare of the community. Allowed in all districts as a conditional use provided the property is an already existing farm. Chickens and Bees are considered hobby animals and are allowed in only single and two family residential districts COPYRIGHT 2014 LANDFORM Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.L A N D F O R M 3 City Definitions Ordinance Language Allowed Commercial Districts Milwaukee, WI Beekeeper means a person who owns or has charge of one or more colonies of bees and has demonstrated to the commissioner that he or she has obtained formal education or sufficient practical experience to act as a beekeeper. Keeping Of Honey Bees. A permit authorizes the keeping of honey bee hives on a premise, provided the following: a. No more than 2 hives are allowed on a lot. b. Honey bees are limited to eastern european races of apismelifera. c. All honey bees shall be kept in hives with removable frames which shall be kept in sound and usable condition. d. A minimum 6-foot high closed fence, closed hedge, building or other solid flyway barrier or other barrier which the commissioner determines to be of sufficient height shall be located between hives and the property lines for all hives located within 20 feet of the property line. A supply of water shall be located within these enclosures and flyway barriers. A flyway barrier is not needed if the bee hive is kept at least 10 feet off the ground. e. All hives and related structures that form the apiary shall be located a minimum of 20 feet from the front property line and 10 feet from all other property lines. Keeping Of Chickens Allowed. The keeping of up to 4 chickens, with a permit, is allowed on a residential premise, provided the following: a. No person shall keep any rooster. b. No person shall slaughter any chickens. c. Chickens shall be provided with fresh water at all times and adequate amounts of feed. d. Chickens shall be provided with a sanitary and adequately-sized covered enclosure, or coop, and shall be kept in the covered enclosure or a sanitary and adequately-sized and accessible fenced enclosure, or yard, at all times. e. Chicken coops shall be constructed in a workmanlike manner, be moisture-resistant and either raised up off the ground or placed on a hard surface such as concrete, patio block or gravel. f. Chicken coops and yards shall be constructed and maintained to reasonably prevent the collection of standing water, and shall be cleaned of hen droppings, uneaten feed, feathers and other waste daily and as is necessary to ensure that the coop and yard do not become a health, odor or other nuisance. g. Chicken coops and yards together shall be large enough to provide at least 16 square feet per chicken. h. No enclosure shall be located closer than 25 feet to any residential structure on an adjacent lot. i. No enclosure shall be located in the front yard of a dwelling. Honey Bees are allowed on any lot in the city. Chickens are only allowed in residential districts Clearwater, FL Animal means any mammal, bird, fowl, reptile, monkey, chimpanzee, bee or other dumb creature including but not limited to horses, cows, goats, sheep, pigs, mules, geese, dogs, cats, calves, rabbits, hamsters and mice. Beekeeping The keeping of bees shall be allowed in all nonresidential zoning districts and RS-2 zoning districts within the city; provided, however, that when bees are to be kept in urban zoning districts, the following provisions shall apply: No such beekeeping shall be allowed until the person proposing to function as a beekeeper first secures a permit from the city forester and pays a fee as prescribed in appendix A to this Code. No permit to conduct a beekeeping operation may be granted until the city forester determines that the following conditions have been met: The density of bee colonies on any proposed lot may not exceed one colony of bees for each 2,500 square feet of lot area; The proposed colony of bees may not be located within 50 feet of any property line; A person applying for a beekeeping permit must have available and continue to maintain a fresh source of water on his lot for bees that will be located on the lot during the times that bees fly from hives; Any colony to be located on a lot shall be maintained in smooth frame hives and mature colonies shall be housed in two full depth brook chambers; The proposed location of the beehive will not result in the creation of a danger to the health or safety of persons in the immediate vicinity of the site where it is proposed to locate the beehive. Where the city forester, upon receiving an application to engage in beekeeping, first determines that the above conditions will be complied with and following payment of the required fee, he shall issue the requested beekeeping permit. Not allowed in any commercial districts 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: January 17, 2018 for the January 25, 2018 City Council Meeting RE: City-initiated Small Cell and DAS Facility Ordinance Update (City File 17-039) 60-Day Review Deadline: N/A 1.Application Request Review potential options for updating the City Code to meet new telecommunication standards. 2.Background Minnesota’s telecommunications right-of-way user law (MN Statutes §237.163), regarding small wireless facilities, was signed into law on May 30, 2017. It grants wireless service providers access to the public right-of-way to construct, maintain and operate small wireless facilities and wireless support structures. Small wireless facilities are small antennas and associated equipment used to provide wireless service between a network and its users. Under the new legislation, the City cannot prohibit the placement of such small wireless facilities or structures to support such facilities in the public right-of-way. However, the City may require a user to obtain a permit from the City. The City has 90 days to issue or deny a permit. If the City fails to respond within the time limit, then the permit is deemed approved and the permit is automatically issued. The deadline can be extended by written notification for 30 days if the City receives applications for 30 or more sites within 7 days or an application is incomplete. Any denial of an application must be in writing and state the basis for the denial within 3 business days. Minnesota’s telecommunications right-of-way user law allows cities to charge an annual rent fee for small wireless facilities that are placed on publicly owned streetlights. This is done through an agreement called a small wireless facility agreement. Corcoran does not own any of the streetlights in the right-of-way, so charging a rent fee cannot be applied. The small wireless facilities are deemed a permitted use in any public right-of-way, except that a city may require a conditional use permit (CUP) and go through the process if they wish to locate in a single-family residential district. The state law sets the maximum height of 50 feet and maximum size of 28 cubic feet plus a 6 cubic feet antenna for a small wireless facility. Agenda Item: 9g. Ordinance Amendment – Small Cell and DAS (City File 17-039) 2 January 17, 2018 3. Analysis of Request Staff reviewed the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) informational memo and various cities in the region who are in the process of updating or have updated their right-of-way ordinances and telecommunications ordinance to understand how other communities are handling the new legislation changes. LMC recommends updating or adopting a right-of-way ordinance and making necessary changes to existing telecommunication ordinances. Based on this information staff recommends that we adopt an ordinance amendment. The following direction is recommended by staff to proceed with an ordinance amendment: • Draft a right-of-way ordinance for the City Code (like a new section in Title V- Public Works or a new Title VI – Public Right-of-Way). • The new right-of-way ordinance will provide standards for telecommunication facilities within the right-of-way ordinance. • Amend the telecommunication ordinance in the performance standards of the zoning ordinance to differentiate between small cell facilities and large antenna towers. This would include adding definitions for small wireless facilities and colocation. • While we do believe that that the Telecommunications Ordinance (Section 1060.100) also requires an update to comply with the most recent changes to the Federal Telecommunications Act, there is a less immediate need for those changes and staff recommends a larger update to Section 1060.100 in late 2018 or 2019. If the City does not adopt standards, the new law would allow users to construct these facilities without regulation in the public right-of-way. The City right-of-way may be planned for other improvements or utilities, so we believe it is important to manage the space. Staff would work with the Public Works Director and City Attorney to draft the ordinance updates, using the attached example from the LMC as a guide. Staff estimates the effort to be $2,000- 3,000. 4. Recommendation City Council should direct staff to proceed with drafting an amendment to the Corcoran City Code. Planning Commission would hold a public hearing for the ordinance amendment at their April 5th meeting for Council action on April 26th. Attachments a. Example pictures of small cell and DAS facilities b. LMC Small Cell Fact Sheet c. LMC Model Right-of-Way Ordinance Small Wireless Facilities Examples 1Page 3 2Page 4 3Page 5 4Page 6 5Page 7 6Page 8 7Page 9 8Page 10 small cell wireless: unregulated access to public assets? problem: Private wireless and cellular service providers are pushing legislation (HF739/SF561) that would allow unregulated access to public right-of-way for installation of “small cell wireless” equipment and distributed antenna systems. • These for-profit companies would be the only unregulated industry allowed unfettered access to this public asset. • Automatic approval provided by this legislation ties the hands of cities who are responsible for managing these public spaces and considering elements of public health, safety, and aesthetics. • The legislation limits, and in some cases eliminates, cities’ cost recovery options for maintaining the public assets these companies are accessing. • The legislation would supersede many existing zoning ordinances and comprehensive plans that cities have enacted and planned for over the years. “Cities must balance the need to facilitate these emerging technologies with the needs of the local community.” DID YOU KNOW? Wireless is an important part of our state’s communications infrastructure, but it is a complement, not a substitute for high-speed broadband access in Greater Minnesota cities. background: This small cell technology is being deployed in urban areas to address increased data usage and to eventually deploy a new 5G cellular network. league of minnesota citiescity issue fact sheet 2017 ©2017 League of Minnesota Cities. All Rights Reserved. for more information: Laura Ziegler Senior Intergovernmental Relations Liaison Phone: (651) 281-1267 Email: lziegler@lmc.org www.lmc.org/wirelessfacts Without review process With review process league-supported solution: • The League supports making wireless providers telecommunication right-of-way (ROW) users with the same rights and privileges of other ROW users. League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 1 Right of Way Regulation, LMC / Suburban Rate Authority / City Engineers Association of Minnesota Model Ordinance The League acknowledges the generosity of the Kennedy and Graven law firm for their substantial assistance in updating this model to recognize wireless providers as telecommunications rights of way users. League models are thoughtfully developed by our staff for a city’s consideration. Models should be customized as appropriate for an individual city’s circumstances in consultation with the city’s attorney. Helpful background information on this model may be found in the LMC Information Memo Regulating City Rights of Way. This icon marks comments or offers that will help you decide on different possible approaches offered in the ordinance. Delete them (and this legend) before adopting your customized ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. _____ CITY OF _____,_____COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE TO ENACT A NEW CHAPTER OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO ADMINISTER AND REGULATE THE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE AND REGULATION OF RIGHT OF WAY PERMITS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF _____, _____COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Enacting clauses are different in various charters. The statutory city enacting clause is used here. Chapter _____ of the Code of Ordinances (hereafter “this Code”) is hereby repealed in its entirety, and is replaced by the following new Chapter 1 (hereafter “this Chapter”), to read as follows: In most cases, there will be ordinances or legislative codes that will need to be amended or repealed because of inconsistency with the new regulations. One method is to repeal all those provisions and replace them with this ordinance. Chapter 1 Right of Way Management Sec. 1.01. Findings, Purpose, and Intent. To provide for the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens, and to ensure the integrity of its streets and the appropriate use of the rights of way, the city strives to keep its rights of way in a state of good repair and free from unnecessary encumbrances. Accordingly, the city hereby enacts this new chapter of this code relating to right of way permits and administration. This chapter imposes reasonable regulation on the placement and maintenance of facilities and equipment currently within its rights of way or to be placed therein at some future time. It is intended to complement the regulatory roles of state and federal agencies. Under this chapter, persons excavating and obstructing the rights of way will bear financial responsibility for their work. Finally, this chapter provides for recovery of out-of-pocket and projected costs from League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 2 persons using the public rights of way. This chapter shall be interpreted consistently with 1997 Session Laws, Chapter 123, substantially codified in Minn. Stat. §§ 237.16, 237.162, 237.163, 237.79, 237.81, and 238.086 (the “Act”) and 2017 Minn. Laws, ch. 94, art. 9, amending the Act, and the other laws governing applicable rights of the city and users of the right of way. This chapter shall also be interpreted consistent with Minn. R. 7819.0050–7819.9950 and Minn. R., ch. 7560 where possible. To the extent any provision of this chapter cannot be interpreted consistently with the Minnesota Rules, that interpretation most consistent with the Act and other applicable statutory and case law is intended. This chapter shall not be interpreted to limit the regulatory and police powers of the city to adopt and enforce general ordinances necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Sec. 1.02. Election to Manage the Public Rights of Way Pursuant to the authority granted to the city under state and federal statutory, administrative and common law, the city hereby elects, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 237.163 subd. 2(b), to manage rights of way within its jurisdiction. Sec. 1.03. Definitions. The following definitions apply in this chapter of this code. References hereafter to “sections” are, unless otherwise specified, references to sections in this chapter. Defined terms remain defined terms, whether or not capitalized. Abandoned Facility. A facility no longer in service or physically disconnected from a portion of the operating facility, or from any other facility, that is in use or still carries service. A facility is not abandoned unless declared so by the right of way user. Applicant. Any person requesting permission to excavate or obstruct a right of way. City. The city of _____, Minnesota. For purposes of section 1.29, city also means the City’s elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. Collocate or Collocation. To install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility on, under, within, or adjacent to an existing wireless support structure or utility pole that is owned privately, or by the city or other governmental unit. Commission. The State Public Utilities Commission. Congested Right of Way. A crowded condition in the subsurface of the public right of way that occurs when the maximum lateral spacing between existing underground facilities does not allow for construction of new underground facilities without using hand digging to expose the existing lateral facilities in conformance with Minn. Stat. § 216D.04, subd. 3, over a continuous length in excess of 500 feet. Construction Performance Bond. Any of the following forms of security provided at permittee’s option: • Individual project bond; • Cash deposit; League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 3 • Security of a form listed or approved under Minn. Stat. § 15.73, subd. 3; • Letter of Credit, in a form acceptable to the city; • Self-insurance, in a form acceptable to the city; • A blanket bond for projects within the city, or other form of construction bond, for a time specified and in a form acceptable to the city. Degradation. A decrease in the useful life of the right of way caused by excavation in or disturbance of the right of way, resulting in the need to reconstruct such right of way earlier than would be required if the excavation or disturbance did not occur. Degradation Cost. Subject to Minn. R. 7819.1100, means the cost to achieve a level of restoration, as determined by the city at the time the permit is issued, not to exceed the maximum restoration shown in plates 1 to 13, set forth in Minn. R., parts 7819.9900 to 7819.9950. Degradation Fee. The estimated fee established at the time of permitting by the city to recover costs associated with the decrease in the useful life of the right of way caused by the excavation, and which equals the degradation cost. Department. The department of public works of the city. Note: If a city does not have a public works department, an equivalent department may be designated. Director. The director of the department of public works of the city, or her or his designee. Note: Some cities may prefer to use the term city rather than delegating responsibilities to a specific position. Delay Penalty. The penalty imposed as a result of unreasonable delays in right of way excavation, obstruction, patching, or restoration as established by permit. Emergency. A condition that (1) poses a danger to life or health, or of a significant loss of property; or (2) requires immediate repair or replacement of facilities in order to restore service to a customer. Equipment. Any tangible asset used to install, repair, or maintain facilities in any right of way. Excavate. To dig into or in any way remove or physically disturb or penetrate any part of a right of way. Excavation permit. The permit which, pursuant to this chapter, must be obtained before a person may excavate in a right of way. An Excavation permit allows the holder to excavate that part of the right of way described in such permit. Excavation Permit Fee. Money paid to the city by an applicant to cover the costs as provided in Section 1.13. Facility or Facilities. Any tangible asset in the right of way required to provide Utility Service. League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 4 Five-Year Project Plan. Shows projects adopted by the city for construction within the next five years. High Density Corridor. A designated portion of the public right of way within which telecommunications right of way users having multiple and competing facilities may be required to build and install facilities in a common conduit system or other common structure. Hole. An excavation in the pavement, with the excavation having a length less than the width of the pavement. Local Representative. A local person or persons, or designee of such person or persons, authorized by a registrant to accept service and to make decisions for that registrant regarding all matters within the scope of this chapter. Management Costs. The actual costs the city incurs in managing its rights of way, including such costs, if incurred, as those associated with registering applicants; issuing, processing, and verifying right of way or small wireless facility permit applications; inspecting job sites and restoration projects; maintaining, supporting, protecting, or moving user facilities during right of way work; determining the adequacy of right of way restoration; restoring work inadequately performed after providing notice and the opportunity to correct the work; and revoking right of way or small wireless facility permits. Management costs do not include payment by a telecommunications right of way user for the use of the right of way, unreasonable fees of a third-party contractor used by the city including fees tied to or based on customer counts, access lines, or revenues generated by the right-of-way or for the city, the fees and cost of litigation relating to the interpretation of Minnesota Session Laws 1997, Chapter 123; Minn. Stat. §§ 237.162 or 237.163; or any ordinance enacted under those sections, or the city fees and costs related to appeals taken pursuant to Section 1.31 of this chapter. Obstruct. To place any tangible object in a right of way so as to hinder free and open passage over that or any part of the right of way. Obstruction Permit. The permit which, pursuant to this chapter, must be obtained before a person may obstruct a right of way, allowing the holder to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of that right of way, for the duration specified therein. Obstruction Permit Fee. Money paid to the city by a permittee to cover the costs as provided in Section 1.13. Patch or Patching. A method of pavement replacement that is temporary in nature. A patch consists of (1) the compaction of the subbase and aggregate base, and (2) the replacement, in kind, of the existing pavement for a minimum of two feet beyond the edges of the excavation in all directions. A patch is considered full restoration only when the pavement is included in the city’s five-year project plan. Pavement. Any type of improved surface that is within the public right of way and that is paved or otherwise constructed with bituminous, concrete, aggregate, or gravel. League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 5 Permit. Has the meaning given “right of way permit” in Minn. Stat. § 237.162. Permittee. Any person to whom a permit to excavate or obstruct a right of way has been granted by the city under this chapter. Person. An individual or entity subject to the laws and rules of this state, however organized, whether public or private, whether domestic or foreign, whether for profit or nonprofit, and whether natural, corporate, or political. Probation. The status of a person that has not complied with the conditions of this chapter. Note: This paragraph is included as an option for your city) Probationary Period. One year from the date that a person has been notified in writing that they have been put on probation. Note: This paragraph is included as an option for your city. Registrant. Any person who (1) has or seeks to have its equipment or facilities located in any right of way, or (2) in any way occupies or uses, or seeks to occupy or use, the right of way or place its facilities or equipment in the right of way. Restore or Restoration. The process by which an excavated right of way and surrounding area, including pavement and foundation, is returned to the same condition and life expectancy that existed before excavation. Restoration Cost. The amount of money paid to the city by a permittee to achieve the level of restoration according to plates 1 to 13 of Minnesota Public Utilities Commission rules. Public Right of Way or Right of Way. The area on, below, or above a public roadway, highway, street, cartway, bicycle lane, or public sidewalk in which the city has an interest, including other dedicated rights of way for travel purposes and utility easements of the city. A right of way does not include the airwaves above a right of way with regard to cellular or other non-wire telecommunications or broadcast service. Note: this definition does not include other public grounds that may be the subject of other city requirements. Right of Way Permit. Either the excavation permit or the obstruction permit, or both, depending on the context, required by this chapter. Right of Way User. (1) A telecommunications right of way user as defined by Minn. Stat., § 237.162, subd. 4; or (2) a person owning or controlling a facility in the right of way that is used or intended to be used for providing utility service, and who has a right under law, franchise, or ordinance to use the public right of way. Service or Utility Service. Includes (1) those services provided by a public utility as defined in Minn. Stat. 216B.02, subds. 4 and 6; (2) services of a telecommunications right of way user, including transporting of voice or data information; (3) services of a cable communications systems as defined in Minn. Stat. ch. 238; (4) natural gas or electric energy or League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 6 telecommunications services provided by the city; (5) services provided by a cooperative electric association organized under Minn. Stat., ch. 308A; and (6) water, and sewer, including service laterals, steam, cooling, or heating services. Service Lateral. An underground facility that is used to transmit, distribute or furnish ‘gas, electricity, communications, or water from a common source to an end-use customer. A service lateral is also an underground facility that is used in the removal of wastewater from a customer’s premises. Small Wireless Facility. A wireless facility that meets both of the following qualifications: (i) each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet in volume or could fit within such an enclosure; and (ii) all other wireless equipment associated with the small wireless facility provided such equipment is, in aggregate, no more than 28 cubic feet in volume, not including electric meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, battery backup power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cutoff switches, cable, conduit, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services, and any equipment concealed from public view within or behind an existing structure or concealment. Supplementary Application. An application made to excavate or obstruct more of the right of way than allowed in, or to extend, a permit that had already been issued. Temporary Surface. The compaction of subbase and aggregate base and replacement, in kind, of the existing pavement only to the edges of the excavation. It is temporary in nature except when the replacement is of pavement included in the city’s two-year plan, in which case it is considered full restoration. Trench. An excavation in the pavement, with the excavation having a length equal to or greater than the width of the pavement. Telecommunications Right of Way User. A person owning or controlling a facility in the right of way, or seeking to own or control a facility in the right of way that is used or is intended to be used for providing wireless service, or transporting telecommunication or other voice or data information. For purposes of this chapter, a cable communication system defined and regulated under Minn. Stat. ch. 238, and telecommunication activities related to providing natural gas or electric energy services, a public utility as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216B.02, a municipality, a municipal gas or power agency organized under Minn. Stat. ch. 453 and 453A, or a cooperative electric association organized under Minn. Stat. ch. 308A, are not telecommunications right of way users for purposes of this chapter except to the extent such entity is offering wireless service. Two Year Project Plan. Shows projects adopted by the city for construction within the next two years. Utility Pole. A pole that is used in whole or in part to facilitate telecommunications or electric League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 7 service. Wireless Facility. Equipment at a fixed location that enables the provision of wireless services between user equipment and a wireless service network, including equipment associated with wireless service, a radio transceiver, antenna, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and a small wireless facility, but not including wireless support structures, wireline backhaul facilities, or cables between utility poles or wireless support structures, or not otherwise immediately adjacent to and directly associated with a specific antenna. Wireless Service. Any service using licensed or unlicensed wireless spectrum, including the use of Wi-Fi, whether at a fixed location or by means of a mobile device, that is provided using wireless facilities. Wireless service does not include services regulated under Title VI of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, including cable service. Wireless Support Structure. A new or existing structure in a right-of-way designed to support or capable of supporting small wireless facilities, as reasonably determined by the city. Sec. 1.04 Administration. The director is the principal city official responsible for the administration of the rights of way, right of way permits, and the ordinances related thereto. The director may delegate any or all of the duties hereunder. The city manager would usually make the appointment. A council resolution should be used in the typical weak mayor, non-manager city. The mayor of strong mayor cities would typically make this appointment. Sec. 1.05. Utility Coordination Committee. The city may create an advisory utility coordination committee. Participation on the committee is voluntary. It will be composed of any registrants that wish to assist the city in obtaining information and, by making recommendations regarding use of the right of way, and to improve the process of performing construction work therein. The city may determine the size of such committee and shall appoint members from a list of registrants that have expressed a desire to assist the city. Note: This is not required as part of state or federal law but is included as an option for your city. Sec. 1.06. Registration and Right of Way Occupancy. Subd. 1. Registration. Each person who occupies or uses, or seeks to occupy or use, the right of way or place any equipment or facilities in or on the right of way, including persons with installation and maintenance responsibilities by lease, sublease, or assignment, must register with the city. Registration will consist of providing application information. Subd. 2. Registration Prior to Work. No person may construct, install, repair, remove, relocate, or perform any other work on, or use any facilities or any part thereof, in any right of way without first being registered with the city. Subd. 3. Exceptions. Nothing herein shall be construed to repeal or amend the provisions of a city ordinance permitting persons to plant or maintain boulevard plantings or gardens in the area of the right of way between their property and the street curb. Persons planting or maintaining League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 8 boulevard plantings or gardens shall not be deemed to use or occupy the right of way, and shall not be required to obtain any permits or satisfy any other requirements for planting or maintaining such boulevard plantings or gardens under this chapter. However, nothing herein relieves a person from complying with the provisions of the Minn. Stat. ch. 216D, Gopher One Call Law. Sec. 1.07. Registration Information. Subd. 1. Information Required. The information provided to the city at the time of registration shall include, but not be limited to: (a) Each registrant’s name, Gopher One-Call registration certificate number, address and email address, if applicable, and telephone and facsimile numbers. (b) The name, address, and email address, if applicable, and telephone and facsimile numbers of a local representative. The local representative or designee shall be available at all times. Current information regarding how to contact the local representative in an emergency shall be provided at the time of registration. (c) A certificate of insurance or self-insurance: (1) Verifying that an insurance policy has been issued to the registrant by an insurance company licensed to do business in the state of Minnesota, or a form of self-insurance acceptable to the city; (2) Verifying that the registrant is insured against claims for personal injury, including death, as well as claims for property damage arising out of the (i) use and occupancy of the right of way by the registrant, its officers, agents, employees, and permittees, and (ii) placement and use of facilities and equipment in the right of way by the registrant, its officers, agents, employees, and permittees, including, but not limited to, protection against liability arising from completed operations, damage of underground facilities, and collapse of property; (3) Naming the city as an additional insured as to whom the coverages required herein are in force and applicable and for whom defense will be provided as to all such coverages; (4) Requiring that the city be notified thirty (30) days in advance of cancellation of the policy or material modification of a coverage term; and (5) Indicating comprehensive liability coverage, automobile liability coverage, workers’ compensation and umbrella coverage established by the city in amounts sufficient to protect the city and the public and to carry out the purposes and policies of this chapter. (6) The city may require a copy of the actual insurance policies. (7) If the person is a corporation, a copy of the certificate is required to be filed under state law as recorded and certified to by the secretary of state. (8) A copy of the person’s order granting a certificate of authority from the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission or other authorization or approval from the applicable state or federal agency to lawfully operate, where the person is lawfully required to have such authorization or approval from said commission or other state or federal agency. Subd. 2. Notice of Changes. The registrant shall keep all of the information listed above current at all times by providing to the city information as to changes within fifteen (15) days following League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 9 the date on which the registrant has knowledge of any change. Sec. 1.08. Reporting Obligations. Subd. 1. Operations. Each registrant shall, at the time of registration and by December 1 of each year, file a construction and major maintenance plan for underground facilities with the city. Such plan shall be submitted using a format designated by the city and shall contain the information determined by the city to be necessary to facilitate the coordination and reduction in the frequency of excavations and obstructions of rights of way. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: (a) The locations and the estimated beginning and ending dates of all projects to be commenced during the next calendar year (in this section, a “next-year project”); and (b) To the extent known, the tentative locations and estimated beginning and ending dates for all projects contemplated for the five years following the next calendar year (in this section, a “five-year project”). The term “project” in this section shall include both next-year projects and five-year projects. By January 1 of each year, the city will have available for inspection in the city’s office a composite list of all projects of which the city has been informed of the annual plans. All registrants are responsible for keeping themselves informed of the current status of this list. Thereafter, by February 1, each registrant may change any project in its list of next-year projects, and must notify the city and all other registrants of all such changes in said list. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a registrant may at any time join in a next-year project of another registrant listed by the other registrant. Subd. 2. Additional Next-Year Projects. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the city will not deny an application for a right of way permit for failure to include a project in a plan submitted to the city if the registrant has used commercially reasonable efforts to anticipate and plan for the project. Sec. 1.09. Permit Requirement. Subd. 1. Permit Required. Except as otherwise provided in this code, no person may obstruct or excavate any right of way, or install or place facilities in the right of way, without first having obtained the appropriate right of way permit from the city to do so. (a) Excavation Permit. An excavation permit is required by a registrant to excavate that part of the right of way described in such permit and to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of the right of way by placing facilities described therein, to the extent and for the duration specified therein. (b) Obstruction Permit. An obstruction permit is required by a registrant to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of right of way by placing equipment described therein on the right of way, to the extent and for the duration specified therein. An obstruction permit is not required if a person already possesses a valid excavation permit for the same project. League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 10 (c) Small Wireless Facility Permit. A small wireless facility permit is required by a registrant to erect or install a wireless support structure, to collocate a small wireless facility, or to otherwise install a small wireless facility in the specified portion or the right of way, to the extent specified therein, provided that such permit shall remain in effect for the length of time the facility is in use, unless lawfully revoked. Subd. 2. Permit Extensions. No person may excavate or obstruct the right of way beyond the date or dates specified in the permit unless (i) such person makes a supplementary application for another right of way permit before the expiration of the initial permit, and (ii) a new permit or permit extension is granted. Subd. 3. Delay Penalty. In accordance with Minn. Rule 7819.1000 subp. 3 and notwithstanding subd. 2 of this Section, the city shall establish and impose a delay penalty for unreasonable delays in right of way excavation, obstruction, patching, or restoration. The delay penalty shall be established from time to time by City Council resolution. Subd. 4. Permit Display. Permits issued under this chapter shall be conspicuously displayed or otherwise available at all times at the indicated work site and shall be available for inspection by the city. Sec. 1.10. Permit Applications. Application for a permit is made to the city. Right of way permit applications shall contain, and will be considered complete only upon compliance with, the requirements of the following provisions: Note: See Information Memo “Regulating City Rights of Way” for information and links to sample permit application. (a) Registration with the city pursuant to this chapter. (b) Submission of a completed permit application form, including all required attachments, and scaled drawings showing the location and area of the proposed project and the location of all known existing and proposed facilities. (c) Payment of money due the city for: (1) permit fees, estimated restoration costs, and other management costs; (2) prior obstructions or excavations; (3) any undisputed loss, damage, or expense suffered by the city because of applicant’s prior excavations or obstructions of the rights of way or any emergency actions taken by the city; (4) franchise fees or other charges, if applicable. (d) Payment of disputed amounts due the city by posting security or depositing in an escrow account an amount equal to at least 110 percent of the amount owing. (e) Posting an additional or larger construction performance bond for additional facilities when applicant requests an excavation permit to install additional facilities and the city deems the existing construction performance bond inadequate under applicable standards. Sec. 1.11. Issuance of Permit; Conditions. Subd. 1. Permit Issuance. If the applicant has satisfied the requirements of this chapter, the city shall issue a permit. League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 11 Subd. 2. Conditions. The city may impose reasonable conditions upon the issuance of the permit and the performance of the applicant thereunder to protect the health, safety, and welfare or when necessary to protect the right of way and its current use. In addition, a permittee shall comply with all requirements of local, state, and federal laws, including but not limited to Minn. Stat. §§ 216D.01 - .09 (Gopher One Call Excavation Notice System) and Minn. R., ch. 7560. Subd. 3. Small Wireless Facility Conditions. In addition to subdivision 2, the erection or installation of a wireless support structure, the collocation of a small wireless facility, or other installation of a small wireless facility in the right-of-way, shall be subject to the following conditions: (a) A small wireless facility shall only be collocated on the particular wireless support structure, under those attachment specifications, and at the height indicated in the applicable permit application. (b) No new wireless support structure installed within the right-of-way shall exceed 50 feet in height without the city’s written authorization, provided that the city may impose a lower height limit in the applicable permit to protect the public health, safety and welfare or to protect the right-of-way and its current use, and further provided that a registrant may replace an existing wireless support structure exceeding 50 feet in height with a structure of the same height subject to such conditions or requirements as may be imposed in the applicable permit. (c) No wireless facility may extend more than 10 feet above its wireless support structure. (d) Where an applicant proposes to install a new wireless support structure in the right-of- way, the city may impose separation requirements between such structure and any existing wireless support structure or other facilities in and around the right-of-way. (e) Where an applicant proposes collocation on a decorative wireless support structure, sign or other structure not intended to support small wireless facilities, the city may impose reasonable requirements to accommodate the particular design, appearance or intended purpose of such structure. (f) Where an applicant proposes to replace a wireless support structure, the city may impose reasonable restocking, replacement, or relocation requirements on the replacement of such structure. Subd. 4. Small Wireless Facility Agreement. A small wireless facility shall only be collocated on a small wireless support structure owned or controlled by the city, or any other city asset in the right-of-way, after the applicant has executed a standard small wireless facility collocation agreement with the city. The standard collocation agreement may require payment of the following: (a) Up to $150 per year for rent to collocate on the city structure. (b) $25 per year for maintenance associated with the collocation; (c) A monthly fee for electrical service as follows: 1. $73 per radio node less than or equal to 100 maximum watts; 2. $182 per radio node over 100 maximum watts; or 3. The actual costs of electricity, if the actual cost exceed the foregoing. The standard collocation agreement shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, the required small wireless facility permit, provided, however, that the applicant shall not be additionally required League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 12 to obtain a license or franchise in order to collocate. Issuance of a small wireless facility permit does not supersede, alter or affect any then-existing agreement between the city and applicant, Sec. 1.12 Action on Small Wireless Facility Permit Applications. Subd. 1. Deadline for Action. The city shall approve or deny a small wireless facility permit application within 90 days after filing of such application. The small wireless facility permit, and any associated building permit application, shall be deemed approved if the city fails to approve or deny the application within the review periods established in this section. Subd. 2. Consolidated Applications. An applicant may file a consolidated small wireless facility permit application addressing the proposed collocation of up to 15 small wireless facilities, or a greater number if agreed to by a local government unit, provided that all small wireless facilities in the application: (a) are located within a two-mile radius; (b) consist of substantially similar equipment; and (c) are to be placed on similar types of wireless support structures. In rendering a decision on a consolidated permit application, the city may approve some small wireless facilities and deny others, but may not use denial of one or more permits as a basis to deny all small wireless facilities in the application. Subd. 3. Tolling of Deadline. The 90-day deadline for action on a small wireless facility permit application may be tolled if: (a) The city receives applications from one or more applicants seeking approval of permits for more than 30 small wireless facilities within a seven-day period. In such case, the city may extend the deadline for all such applications by 30 days by informing the affected applicants in writing of such extension. (b) The applicant fails to submit all required documents or information and the city provides written notice of incompleteness to the applicant within 30 days of receipt the application. Upon submission of additional documents or information, the city shall have ten days to notify the applicant in writing of any still-missing information. (c) The city and a small wireless facility applicant agree in writing to toll the review period. Sec. 1.13. Permit Fees. Note: Minn. Rule 7819.1000 establishes requirements for establishing fees. Subd. 1. Excavation Permit Fee. The city shall impose an excavation permit fee in an amount sufficient to recover the following costs: (a) the city management costs; (b) degradation costs, if applicable. Subd. 2. Obstruction Permit Fee. The city shall impose an obstruction permit fee in an amount sufficient to recover the city management costs. Subd 3. Small Wireless Facility Permit Fee. The city shall impose a small wireless facility permit fee in an amount sufficient to recover: (a) management costs, and; League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 13 (b) city engineering, make-ready, and construction costs associated with collocation of small wireless facilities. Subd. 4. Payment of Permit Fees. No excavation permit or obstruction permit shall be issued without payment of excavation or obstruction permit fees. The city may allow applicant to pay such fees within thirty (30) days of billing. Subd. 5. Non Refundable. Permit fees that were paid for a permit that the city has revoked for a breach as stated in Section 1.23 are not refundable. Subd. 6. Application to Franchises. Unless otherwise agreed to in a franchise, management costs may be charged separately from and in addition to the franchise fees imposed on a right of way user in the franchise. Sec. 1.14. Right of Way Patching and Restoration. Subd. 1. Timing. The work to be done under the excavation permit, and the patching and restoration of the right of way as required herein, must be completed within the dates specified in the permit, increased by as many days as work could not be done because of circumstances beyond the control of the permittee or when work was prohibited as unseasonal or unreasonable under Section 1.17. Subd. 2. Patch and Restoration. Permittee shall patch its own work. The city may choose either to have the permittee restore the right of way or to restore the right of way itself. (a) City Restoration. If the city restores the right of way, permittee shall pay the costs thereof within thirty (30) days of billing. If, following such restoration, the pavement settles due to permittee’s improper backfilling, the permittee shall pay to the city, within thirty (30) days of billing, all costs associated with correcting the defective work. (b) Permittee Restoration. If the permittee restores the right of way itself, it shall at the time of application for an excavation permit post a construction performance bond in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Rule 7819.3000. (c) Degradation Fee in Lieu of Restoration. In lieu of right of way restoration, a right of way user may elect to pay a degradation fee. However, the right of way user shall remain responsible for patching and the degradation fee shall not include the cost to accomplish these responsibilities. Subd. 3. Standards. The permittee shall perform excavation, backfilling, patching, and restoration according to the standards and with the materials specified by the city and shall comply with Minn. Rule 7819.1100. Subd. 4. Duty to Correct Defects. The permittee shall correct defects in patching or restoration performed by permittee or its agents. The permittee upon notification from the city, shall correct all restoration work to the extent necessary, using the method required by the city. Said work shall be completed within five (5) calendar days of the receipt of the notice from the city, not including days during which work cannot be done because of circumstances constituting force majeure or days when work is prohibited as unseasonable or unreasonable under Section 1.17. League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 14 Subd. 5. Failure to Restore. If the permittee fails to restore the right of way in the manner and to the condition required by the city, or fails to satisfactorily and timely complete all restoration required by the city, the city at its option may do such work. In that event the permittee shall pay to the city, within thirty (30) days of billing, the cost of restoring the right of way. If permittee fails to pay as required, the city may exercise its rights under the construction performance bond. Sec. 1.15. Joint Applications. Subd. 1. Joint application. Registrants may jointly apply for permits to excavate or obstruct the right of way at the same place and time. Subd. 2. Shared fees. Registrants who apply for permits for the same obstruction or excavation, which the city does not perform, may share in the payment of the obstruction or excavation permit fee. In order to obtain a joint permit, registrants must agree among themselves as to the portion each will pay and indicate the same on their applications. Subd. 3. With city projects. Registrants who join in a scheduled obstruction or excavation performed by the city, whether or not it is a joint application by two or more registrants or a single application, are not required to pay the excavation or obstruction and degradation portions of the permit fee, but a permit would still be required. Sec. 1.16. Supplementary Applications. Subd. 1. Limitation on Area. A right of way permit is valid only for the area of the right of way specified in the permit. No permittee may do any work outside the area specified in the permit, except as provided herein. Any permittee which determines that an area greater than that specified in the permit must be obstructed or excavated must before working in that greater area (i) make application for a permit extension and pay any additional fees required thereby, and (ii) be granted a new permit or permit extension. Subd. 2. Limitation on Dates. A right of way permit is valid only for the dates specified in the permit. No permittee may begin its work before the permit start date or, except as provided herein, continue working after the end date. If a permittee does not finish the work by the permit end date, it must apply for a new permit for the additional time it needs, and receive the new permit or an extension of the old permit before working after the end date of the previous permit. This supplementary application must be submitted before the permit end date. Sec. 1.17. Other Obligations. Subd. 1. Compliance with Other Laws. Obtaining a right of way permit does not relieve permittee of its duty to obtain all other necessary permits, licenses, and authority and to pay all fees required by the city or other applicable rule, law or regulation. A permittee shall comply with all requirements of local, state and federal laws, including but not limited to Minn. Stat. §§ 216D.01-.09 (Gopher One Call Excavation Notice System) and Minn. R., ch. 7560. A permittee shall perform all work in conformance with all applicable codes and established rules and regulations, and is responsible for all work done in the right of way pursuant to its permit, regardless of who does the work. League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 15 Subd. 2. Prohibited Work. Except in an emergency, and with the approval of the city, no right of way obstruction or excavation may be done when seasonally prohibited or when conditions are unreasonable for such work. Subd. 3. Interference with Right of Way. A permittee shall not so obstruct a right of way that the natural free and clear passage of water through the gutters or other waterways shall be interfered with. Private vehicles of those doing work in the right of way may not be parked within or next to a permit area, unless parked in conformance with city parking regulations. The loading or unloading of trucks must be done solely within the defined permit area unless specifically authorized by the permit. Subd. 4. Trenchless excavation. As a condition of all applicable permits, permittees employing trenchless excavation methods, including but not limited to Horizontal Directional Drilling, shall follow all requirements set forth in Minn. Stat. ch. 216D and Minn. R., ch. 7560 and shall require potholing or open cutting over existing underground utilities before excavating, as determined by the director. Sec. 1.18. Denial or Revocation of Permit. Subd. 1. Reasons for Denial. The city may deny a permit for failure to meet the requirements and conditions of this chapter or if the city determines that the denial is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public or when necessary to protect the right of way and its current use. Subd. 2. Procedural Requirements. The denial or revocation of a permit must be made in writing and must document the basis for the denial. The city must notify the applicant or right- of-way user in writing within three business days of the decision to deny or revoke a permit. If an application is denied, the right-of-way user may address the reasons for denial identified by the city and resubmit its application. If the application is resubmitted within 30 days of receipt of the notice of denial, no additional application fee shall be imposed. The city must approve or deny the resubmitted application within 30 days after submission. Sec. 1.19. Installation Requirements. The excavation, backfilling, patching and restoration, and all other work performed in the right of way shall be done in conformance with Minn. R. 7819.1100 and 7819.5000 and other applicable local requirements, in so far as they are not inconsistent with the Minn. Stat., §§ 237.162 and 237.163. Installation of service laterals shall be performed in accordance with Minn. R., ch 7560 and these ordinances. Service lateral installation is further subject to those requirements and conditions set forth by the city in the applicable permits and/or agreements referenced in Section 1.23 subd. 2 of this ordinance. Sec. 1.20. Inspection. Subd. 1. Notice of Completion. When the work under any permit hereunder is completed, the permittee shall furnish a completion certificate in accordance Minn. Rule 7819.1300. Subd. 2. Site Inspection. Permittee shall make the work site available to the city and to all others as authorized by law for inspection at all reasonable times during the execution of and League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 16 upon completion of the work. Subd 3. Authority of Director. (a) At the time of inspection, the director may order the immediate cessation of any work which poses a serious threat to the life, health, safety, or well-being of the public. (b) The director may issue an order to the permittee for any work that does not conform to the terms of the permit or other applicable standards, conditions, or codes. The order shall state that failure to correct the violation will be cause for revocation of the permit. Within ten (10) days after issuance of the order, the permittee shall present proof to the director that the violation has been corrected. If such proof has not been presented within the required time, the director may revoke the permit pursuant to Sec. 1.23. Sec. 1.21. Work Done Without a Permit. Subd. 1. Emergency Situations. Each registrant shall immediately notify the director of any event regarding its facilities that it considers to be an emergency. The registrant may proceed to take whatever actions are necessary to respond to the emergency. Excavators’ notification to Gopher State One Call regarding an emergency situation does not fulfill this requirement. Within two (2) business days after the occurrence of the emergency, the registrant shall apply for the necessary permits, pay the fees associated therewith, and fulfill the rest of the requirements necessary to bring itself into compliance with this chapter for the actions it took in response to the emergency. If the city becomes aware of an emergency regarding a registrant’s facilities, the city will attempt to contact the local representative of each registrant affected, or potentially affected, by the emergency. In any event, the city may take whatever action it deems necessary to respond to the emergency, the cost of which shall be borne by the registrant whose facilities occasioned the emergency. Subd. 2. Non-Emergency Situations. Except in an emergency, any person who, without first having obtained the necessary permit, obstructs or excavates a right of way must subsequently obtain a permit and, as a penalty, pay double the normal fee for said permit, pay double all the other fees required by the city code, deposit with the city the fees necessary to correct any damage to the right of way, and comply with all of the requirements of this chapter. Sec. 1.22. Supplementary Notification. If the obstruction or excavation of the right of way begins later or ends sooner than the date given on the permit, permittee shall notify the city of the accurate information as soon as this information is known. Sec. 1.23. Revocation of Permits. Subd. 1. Substantial Breach. The city reserves its right, as provided herein, to revoke any right of way permit without a fee refund, if there is a substantial breach of the terms and conditions of any statute, ordinance, rule or regulation, or any material condition of the permit. A substantial breach by permittee shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 17 (a) The violation of any material provision of the right of way permit. (b) An evasion or attempt to evade any material provision of the right of way permit, or the perpetration or attempt to perpetrate any fraud or deceit upon the city or its citizens. (c) Any material misrepresentation of fact in the application for a right of way permit. (d) The failure to complete the work in a timely manner, unless a permit extension is obtained or unless the failure to complete work is due to reasons beyond the permittee’s control. (e) The failure to correct, in a timely manner, work that does not conform to a condition indicated on an order issued pursuant to Sec. 1.20. Subd. 2. Written Notice of Breach. If the city determines that the permittee has committed a substantial breach of a term or condition of any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any condition of the permit, the city shall make a written demand upon the permittee to remedy such violation. The demand shall state that continued violations may be cause for revocation of the permit. A substantial breach, as stated above, will allow the city, at its discretion, to place additional or revised conditions on the permit to mitigate and remedy the breach. Subd. 3. Response to Notice of Breach. Within twenty-four (24) hours of receiving notification of the breach, permittee shall provide the city with a plan, acceptable to the city, that will cure the breach. Permittee’s failure to so contact the city, or permittee’s failure to timely submit an acceptable plan, or permittee’s failure to reasonably implement the approved plan, shall be cause for immediate revocation of the permit. Further, permittee’s failure to so contact the city, or permittee’s failure to submit an acceptable plan, or permittee’s failure to reasonably implement the approved plan, shall automatically place the permittee on probation for one (1) full year. Icon Note: The concept of probation is included as an option. It is opposed by the utility industry. Subd. 4. Cause for Probation. From time to time, the city may establish a list of conditions of the permit, which if breached will automatically place the permittee on probation for one full year, such as, but not limited to, working out of the allotted time period or working on right of way grossly outside of the permit authorization. Subd. 5. Automatic Revocation. If a permittee, while on probation, commits a breach as outlined above, permittee’s permit will automatically be revoked and permittee will not be allowed further permits for one full year, except for emergency repairs. Subd. 6. Reimbursement of city costs. If a permit is revoked, the permittee shall also reimburse the city for the city’s reasonable costs, including restoration costs and the costs of collection and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with such revocation. Sec. 1.24. Mapping Data. Subd. 1. Information Required. Each registrant and permittee shall provide mapping information required by the city in accordance with Minn. R. 7819.4000 and 7819.4100. Within ninety (90) days following completion of any work pursuant to a permit, the permittee shall provide the director accurate maps and drawings certifying the “as-built” location of all equipment installed, owned, and maintained by the permittee. Such maps League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 18 and drawings shall include the horizontal and vertical location of all facilities and equipment and shall be provided consistent with the city’s electronic mapping system, when practical or as a condition imposed by the director. Failure to provide maps and drawings pursuant to this subsection shall be grounds for revoking the permit holder’s registration. Subd. 2. Service Laterals. All permits issued for the installation or repair of service laterals, other than minor repairs as defined in Minn. R. 7560.0150, subp. 2, shall require the permittee’s use of appropriate means of establishing the horizontal locations of installed service laterals and the service lateral vertical locations in those cases where the director reasonabl y requires it. Permittees or their subcontractors shall submit to the director evidence satisfactory to the director of the installed service lateral locations. Compliance with this subdivision 2 and with applicable Gopher State One Call law and Minnesota Rules governing service laterals installed after Dec. 31, 2005, shall be a condition of any city approval necessary for: a) payments to contractors working on a public improvement project, including those under Minn. Stat. ch. 429, and b) city approval under development agreements or other subdivision or site plan approval under Minn. Stat. ch. 462. The director shall reasonably determine the appropriate method of providing such information to the city. Failure to provide prompt and accurate information on the service laterals installed may result in the revocation of the permit issued for the work or future permits to the offending permittee or its subcontractors. Sec. 1.25. Location and Relocation of Facilities. Subd. 1. Placement, location, and relocation of facilities must comply with the Act, with other applicable law, and with Minn. R. 7819.3100, 7819.5000, and 7819.5100, to the extent the rules do not limit authority otherwise available to cities. Note: Cities wishing to require the undergrounding of utilities should add the following language to this right of way ordinance and adopt a separate undergrounding ordinance. See Information Memo, “Regulating City Rights of Way” for information on undergrounding and a link to a model ordinance. Subdivision numbering in this section must be adjusted accordingly if the undergrounding provision is included. Subd. 2. Undergrounding. Unless otherwise agreed in a franchise or other agreement between the applicable right of way user and the City, Facilities in the right of way must be located or relocated and maintained underground in accordance with Section _____ of the City Code. Subd. 2. Corridors. The city may assign a specific area within the right of way, or any particular segment thereof as may be necessary, for each type of facility that is or, pursuant to current technology, the city expects will someday be located within the right of way. All excavation, obstruction, or other permits issued by the city involving the installation or replacement of facilities shall designate the proper corridor for the facilities at issue. Note: this is not intended to establish a “high-density corridor.” Cities wishing to establish a high-density corridor should follow PUC rules. League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 19 Any registrant who has facilities in the right of way in a position at variance with the corridors established by the city shall, no later than at the time of the next reconstruction or excavation of the area where the facilities are located, move the facilities to the assigned position within the right of way, unless this requirement is waived by the city for good cause shown, upon consideration of such factors as the remaining economic life of the facilities, public safety, customer service needs, and hardship to the registrant. Subd. 3. Nuisance. One year after the passage of this chapter, any facilities found in a right of way that have not been registered shall be deemed to be a nuisance. The city may exercise any remedies or rights it has at law or in equity, including, but not limited to, abating the nuisance or taking possession of the facilities and restoring the right of way to a useable condition. Subd. 4. Limitation of Space. To protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public, or when necessary to protect the right of way and its current use, the city shall have the power to prohibit or limit the placement of new or additional facilities within the right of way. In making such decisions, the city shall strive to the extent possible to accommodate all existing and potential users of the right of way, but shall be guided primarily by considerations of the public interest, the public’s needs for the particular utility service, the condition of the right of way, the time of year with respect to essential utilities, the protection of existing facilities in the right of way, and future city plans for public improvements and development projects which have been determined to be in the public interest. Sec. 1.26 Pre-Excavation Facilities Location. In addition to complying with the requirements of Minn. Stat. 216D.01-.09 (“One Call Excavation Notice System”) before the start date of any right of way excavation, each registrant who has facilities or equipment in the area to be excavated shall mark the horizontal and vertical placement of all said facilities. Any registrant whose facilities are less than twenty (20) inches below a concrete or asphalt surface shall notify and work closely with the excavation contractor to establish the exact location of its facilities and the best procedure for excavation. Sec. 1.27. Damage to Other Facilities. When the city does work in the right of way and finds it necessary to maintain, support, or move a registrant’s facilities to protect it, the city shall notify the local representative as early as is reasonably possible. The costs associated therewith will be billed to that registrant and must be paid within thirty (30) days from the date of billing. Each registrant shall be responsible for the cost of repairing any facilities in the right of way which it or its facilities damage. Each registrant shall be responsible for the cost of repairing any damage to the facilities of another registrant caused during the city’s response to an emergency occasioned by that registrant’s facilities. Sec. 1.28. Right of Way Vacation. Reservation of right. If the city vacates a right of way that contains the facilities of a registrant, the registrant’s rights in the vacated right of way are governed by Minn. R. 7819.3200. League of Minnesota Cities Model Ordinance: 9/12/2017 23TRight of Way Regulation Page 20 Sec. 1.29. Indemnification and Liability By registering with the city, or by accepting a permit under this chapter, a registrant or permittee agrees to defend and indemnify the city in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Rule 7819.1250. Sec. 1.30. Abandoned and Unusable Facilities. Subd. 1. Discontinued Operations. A registrant who has determined to discontinue all or a portion of its operations in the city must provide information satisfactory to the city that the registrant’s obligations for its facilities in the right of way under this chapter have been lawfully assumed by another registrant. Subd. 2. Removal. Any registrant who has abandoned facilities in any right of way shall remove it from that right of way if required in conjunction with other right of way repair, excavation, or construction, unless this requirement is waived by the city. Sec. 1.31. Appeal. A right of way user that: (1) has been denied registration; (2) has been denied a permit; (3) has had a permit revoked; (4) believes that the fees imposed are not in conformity with Minn. Stat. § 237.163, subd. 6; or (5) disputes a determination of the director regarding Section 1.24, subd.2 of this ordinance may have the denial, revocation, fee imposition, or decision reviewed, upon written request, by the City Council. The City Council shall act on a timely written request at its next regularly scheduled meeting, provided the right of way user has submitted its appeal with sufficient time to include the appeal as a regular agenda item. A decision by the City Council affirming the denial, revocation, or fee imposition will be in writing and supported by written findings establishing the reasonableness of the decision. Sec. 1.32 Reservation of Regulatory and Police Powers A permittee’s rights are subject to the regulatory and police powers of the city to adopt and enforce general ordinances as necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Sec. 1.33. Severability. If any portion of this chapter is for any reason held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Nothing in this chapter precludes the city from requiring a franchise agreement with the applicant, as allowed by law, in addition to requirements set forth herein. Passed by the City Council of _______ this _____ day of Month, Year. ___________________ Mayor Attest: ____________________ City Clerk 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: January 19, 2018 for the January 25, 2018 Council Meeting RE: 2040 Comprehensive Plan – Schedule Update (city file no. 17-001) 1.Summary The Comprehensive Plan is the vision for development in Corcoran. Although it is a physical plan, it reflects the community's social and economic values. These values are translated into the type of land use the City desires and programs regarding economic development, housing, parks, transportation and other key areas. City staff is working to prepare a Draft of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan document. The document will reflect the Council direction at the Work Sessions held this year, the feedback received from the two community surveys and the April Open House. The City will hold a 2nd public open house on Monday, January 29th to review the updated maps. The open house will allow residents, land owners and businesses owners to see the proposed changes in the transportation, land use, parks and utility plans that the Council has discussed. The open house will provide a Frequently Asked Questions sheet for residents to take home and will provide comment cards for attendees to ask questions and provide comments. We encourage City Council members and Commissioners to attend the open house. Staff will provide an update at the February 15th Council Work Session. It is staff’s intention to deliver the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan document to the City Council on February 2nd so that it can be reviewed in advance of the February 15th Work Session. Next steps would be as outlined on the attached schedule: a.Draft document to the Planning Commission – March 1st b.Draft document to the Parks and Trails Commission – March 20th c.Public Hearing at the Planning Commission – April 5th d.Council Action to order distribution – April 26th e.6-month review period for adjacent jurisdictions, agencies and the public f.Council action to submit to the Metropolitan Council for review – November 8th 2.Action Items: No action required. Attachments a.Project Schedule Agenda Item: 9h. GATHER ANALYZE & DISCUSS GATHER ANALYZE & DISCUSS GATHER ANALYZE & DISCUSS GATHER ANALYZE & DISCUSS CELEBRATE processCorcoran 2040 Comprehensive Plan UpdatePlan Update Landform® and From Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Joint Council & Commission Work Session - Comp Plan Kickoff | Priorities and Vision Thursday, March 16, 2017, 7:00pm City Hall Open House Monday, April 17, 2017, 6:00-8:00pm Parks Commission Meeting #1 | Kick Off - Staff Lead Tuesday, April 18, 2017, 7:00 pm City Council Work Session #1 | Big Picture Items Thursday, April 20, 2017, 7:00 pm Planning Commission Meeting # 1 | Big Picture Items Thursday, May 4, 2017, 7:00 pm City Council Work Session #2 | Land Use/MUSA/Development Rights Thursday, May 18, 2017, 7:00 pm Planning Commission Meeting #2 | Land Use Thursday, June 1, 2017, 7:00 pm Parks Commission Meeting #2 | Key Issue Priorities Tuesday, June 20, 2017, 7:00 pm City Council Work Session #3 | Transportation and Parks Thursday, July 20, 2017, 7:00 pm Night To Unite Outreach Tuesday, August 1, 2017 Country Daze Outreach Saturday, August 19, 2017 City Council Work Session #4 | Utilities Thursday, September 21, 2017, 7:00 pm City Council Work Session #4b | Land Use and Others Thursday, October 26, 2017, 5:30 pm City Hall Open House Monday, January 29, 2018, 6:00-8:00pm City Council Work Session #5 | Draft Plan Discussion Thursday, February 15, 2018, 7:00 pm Planning Commission Meeting #3 | Draft Plan Discussion Thursday, March 1, 2018, 7:00 pm Parks Commission Meeting #3 | Draft Plan Discussion Tuesday, March 20, 2018, 7:00 pm Planning Commission Meeting #4 | Public Hearing Thursday, April 5, 2018, 7:00 pm City Council Meeting #6 | Approve For Distribution Thursday, April 26, 2018, 7:00 pm Tentative City Council Work Meeting #7 | Send to Metropolitan Council Thursday, November 8, 2018, 7:00 pm STAFF REPORT Agenda Item. 11a. Council Meeting: January 25, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens, Kevin Mattson, Pat Meister, Ryan Burns Topic: 2018-2019 Capital Improvement Plan Action Required: Approval Summary: On even years the City has traditionally approved a two year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP is generally for purchases of equipment that is over $5,000 in cost and lasts at least five years. Funding for the CIP comes from a mixture of general levy funds and bond sales. Prior to 2015, only bond funds were used, since 2015 the City has increased the general levy by $25,000 per year with the goal of no longer using bond sales for most CIP purchases. The typical schedule for approving the CIP is the second meeting in February with the issuance of bonds thereafter. A change for this year is that two items in the proposed CIP are requested for advance approval as one is needed earlier than usual, and one has a long order timeline. It is requested that the City Council authorize staff to order the following items now in advance of the full approval of the 2018-2019 CIP. Payment will not be due until we receive the equipment. 2018 Mack – Single Axle Dump Truck The City will assume responsibility and ownership of additional roadways located within the Ravinia Neighborhood and other upcoming developments as early as the winter of 2018. These neighborhoods have street features that are new to the City, such as cul- de-sacs with raised center islands, which impact the plowing operations of Public Works. Therefore, in an effort to maintain a similar level of service to the community, staff had planned for the purchase of a single axle truck with plow equipment in the 2018-2019 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The lead time to receive the equipment is approximately 10 months. 2018 Ford Interceptor Utility K9 Squad The 2018 CIP includes a purchase of a squad for the K9 officer as discussed at the January 11th meeting. Current order lead time according to the contractor is approximately 90 days plus squad setup time of two to three weeks. Canine training classes start in mid-March. Staff would like to be able to receive the vehicle, up fit the vehicle and utilize the purpose built K9 squad as soon as practical. These two items are part of a larger planed 2018-2019 CIP. A draft outline of that plan is attached to this report. Financial/Budget: State contract pricing was used to obtain quotes as follows: 2018 Mack - Single Axle Truck $91,985.00* *Estimated tax and license $7,000 (6.875% + license) Plow equipment $116,409.00 Sub-total $215,934 2018 Ford Interceptor Utility K9 Squad $43,500 Total $258,894 The attached draft 2018-2019 Capital Improvement Plan shows sources and uses of funds. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost-effective, and friendly manner. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Options: 1. Authorize staff to purchase of a 2018 Mack – Single Axle Truck and 2018 Ford Interceptor Utility K9 Squad as presented. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Authorize staff to purchase of a 2018 Mack – Single Axle Truck and 2018 Ford Interceptor Utility K9 Squad as presented. Council Action: Authorize staff to purchase of a 2018 Mack – Single Axle Truck and 2018 Ford Interceptor Utility K9 Squad as presented. Attachments: 1. Draft 2018-2019 Capital Improvement Plan 2. Quotes - 2018 Mack – Single Axle Truck Department Item Cost Re-sale Total Proposed Notes Administration City Hall carpet $25,000 $0 $25,000 Installed in 1994 City Hall office improvements $100,000 $0 $100,000 Accommodate additional staff IT Transition $35,000 Move to annual cloud with annual subscriptions City website update $30,000 $0 $30,000 New website Police Squad - SUV Ford Explorer $43,500 $0 $43,500 New for Canine position Squad - SUV Ford Explorer $43,500 $9,000 $34,500 Replace squad transitioned to Detective position Replacement AED's $30,000 $0 $30,000 Reached life expectency Support/protection equipment $10,000 $0 $10,000 Public Works Single Axle Dump Truck $215,934 $0 $215,934 New Equipment Hydroseeder $17,000 $0 $17,000 Replace truck totalled in 2016 Vac Trailer $70,000 $0 $70,000 New equipment Sub-total $575,934 Department Item Cost Re-sale Total Notes Administration City Hall shingles $80,000 $0 $80,000 Police Squad - SUV Ford Explorer $43,500 $3,000 $40,500 Re-purpose squad for code enforcement; auction Durango Support/protection equipment $10,000 $0 $10,000 Public Works Front end loader $200,000 $50,000 $150,000 Replace 2004 front end loader Sub-total $280,500 Total $856,434 Fund Balance $41,918 Cash $100,000 Bond Revenue $434,016 Subtotal $575,934 Fund Balance $0 Cash $125,000 Bond Revenue $155,500 Subtotal $280,500 Total $856,434 Total Bond Rev.$589,516 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 - 2019 Capital Improvement Plan Expenditures 2018 - 2019 Capital Improvement Plan Revenue STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 11b. Council Meeting: January 25, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commissioner Appointment Process Action Required: Direction Summary: The following Commissioner appointments expire in 2018:  Planning Commission o Terms expire February 28, 2018  Meredith Wu  Jennifer Russell  Parks and Trails Commission o Terms expire February 28, 2018  Val Nybo  Judy Strehler Staff has included a general notice about commissioner opportunities in the January newsletter. Additionally, commissioners with expiring terms will receive a notice from the City informing them about the expiring term and the application process. It is requested that the City Council direct staff on how to proceed with the appointment process. Financial/Budget: Commissioners work without compensation and there are no additional costs to coordinate the appointment process. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EQUAL OPPORTUNITY We believe that every employee and citizen should be afforded an equal opportunity to participate in all aspects of employment, citizenship, and governance in the City of Corcoran based exclusively on their ability to contribute. Options: 1. Direct staff to continue has outlined in the report and bring applications for the Planning Commission and Parks and Trails Commission to the February 22, 2018 City Council meeting for consideration. 2. Direct staff to schedule City Council interviews of commissioner applicants in advance of the February 22, 2018 meeting. 3. Other process as directed by the Council. Page 2 Recommendation: N/A Council Action: Direct staff on how to coordinate appointments to City commissions. Attachments: N/A STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 11c. Council Meeting: January 25, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Temporary Assistant to the City Administrator Action Required: Approval Summary: Staff is preparing for a scheduled leave of the City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator over approximately 12 weeks. There is significant work that must be completed during that time and it is requested the City Council approve the hiring of a Temporary Assistant to the City Administrator to assist the Administration Department. The following is a list of some of the duties anticipated to be completed by the position: • City Council minutes • City Council postings • Council packet assistance • Drafting of resolutions/ordinances required for approvals • Summer Seasonal Maintenance Worker hiring process • Liquor license renewal process • Assessment searches • Assist with data requests • Assist with social media postings • Assist with newsletter • Research and work at the direction of the City Administrator • Assist the Administration Department as needed This is an important position as the City Administrator and other administrative staff will need to fulfill many of the tasks normally completed by the City Clerk/Administrative Services Coordinator. If approved, staff would post on the League of Minnesota Cities website and reach out to various groups who may know interested individuals. Financial/Budget: Staff is recommending a wage of $15/hour and anticipates 30 hours per week over 12 weeks. A total cost is estimated to be $5,800. This is an un-budgeted expense that the City Administrator would manage. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost-effective, and friendly manner. Page 2 FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Options: 1. Approve the position of Temporary Assistant to the City Administrator and direct the City Administrator to hire the position. 2. Decline the position. 3. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Approve the position of Temporary Assistant to the City Administrator and direct the City Administrator to hire the position. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve the position of Temporary Assistant to the City Administrator and direct the City Administrator to hire the position Attachments: None STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 11d. Council Meeting: January 25, 2018 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Recreation Coordinator Job Description and Hiring Process Action Required: Approval Summary: The approved 2018 budget includes a new year-round part-time (20 hours per week) Recreation Coordinator position. This is an expansion of a previous summer seasonal Recreation Coordinator position that was hired in both 2016 and 2017. The primary role of the position is to take over the activities of the Corcoran Athletic Association and Corcoran Soccer Association, a request of those organizations. Additional duties will be event planning, Parks and Trails Commission support, park planning support, and more. It is requested that the City Council review and approve the attached Job Description and authorize the City Administrator to hire the position. The anticipated start date is March 2018. Financial/Budget: The position is budgeted for 20 hours per week at $15 per hour. Due to the delay in hiring the position until March it is anticipated that the position will be $3,600 under budget for 2018. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost-effective, and friendly manner. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We believe that fiscal responsibility and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Options: 1. Approve the job description and authorize the City Administrator to hire the position. 2. Decline the position. 3. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Approve the job description and authorize the City Administrator to hire the position. Page 2 Council Action: Consider a motion to approve the job description and authorize the City Administrator to hire the position. Attachments: 1. Job Description – Recreation Coordinator 2. Position Profile – Recreation Coordinator RECREATION COORDINATOR ©City of Corcoran 2018 1 Job Summary: The Recreation Coordinator is responsible for coordinating recreation and community activities for the City of Corcoran with the assistance of the Corcoran Athletic Association, and Corcoran Soccer Association. Scope of Impact: The Recreation Coordinator is responsible for setting up programs of youth baseball/softball, youth soccer, and adult softball including registration, scheduling, and overall coordination. The Recreation Coordinator will also assist in the planning of the annual community event and night to unite and provide support to the Parks and Trails Commission. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: • Meet and coordinate with various city staff, athletic associations, and community group volunteers. • Coordinate registration, scheduling, and associated activities for programs. • Establish formal programming plans for the programs. • Promote and market programs. • Compile rosters and send shirt inventory for team shirts/jerseys. • Reserve fields and meeting rooms as necessary. • Create field maps and website updates. • Visit, observe, and participate in different phases of programs and operations. • Provide assistance to the Parks and Trails Commission including attending meetings. • Provide assistance to City Administrator in design and development of parks. Minimum Qualifications: High school diploma or equivalent and possess a valid driver’s license. Be able to read instructions and verbally communicate to the general public. Ability to effectively communicate pertinent information to the City Administrator, Public Works Superintendent, and City Hall staff when necessary. Desired Qualifications: Education in Recreation, Parks, and Leisure Services or related field. Previous experience supervising recreation activities. Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance: • General customer service skills including ability to communicate rules and directions to others. • Ability to effectively communicate pertinent information to City Administrator, Public Works Superintendent, and the City Hall staff when necessary. • Ability to understand and carry out verbal and/or written instructions efficiently and effectively and to read and understand printed material. • Ability to work effectively with children and adults. • Basic computer processing skills including MS Office and Excel. Department: Administration Reports To: City Administrator FLSA Part-time Year-round Revision Date: January 2018 City of Corcoran RECREATION COORDINATOR ©City of Corcoran 2018 2 • Ability to work independently without constant supervision. Physical and Mental Requirements: Physical effort is medium, with lifting or carrying up to 50 pounds intermittently. Frequent walking, standing, reaching, sitting, and bending. Working Conditions: Work is performed both inside an office and at park facilities. Working conditions are dependent on weather forecasts and may include occasional inclement weather including heat, humidity, cold, rain, and wind. Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator retains the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. Employee Signature and Date: ___________________________________________________________________________ Supervisor and / or Department Head Signature and Date: ____________________________________________________ www.ci.corcoran.mn.us AT A GLANCE City: Corcoran, MN Population: 5,498 Position: Recreation Coordinator Part-time, 20 hours per week Anticipated Start Date: March 2018 Starting Wage $15.00/hour The position participates in the Public Employee Retirement Association Pension Plan (if selected candidate is eligible). Proposed Recruitment Schedule Applications Due February 16 2018 Initial Interviews February 20, 2018 Second Interviews Late February (if necessary) Anticipated Start Date March 2018 Please note dates are subject to change. CITY OF CORCORAN Recreation Coordinator POSITION PROFILE The City of Corcoran is seeking a community focused and team oriented individual to coordinate and manage parks and recreation activities. This is a new position in response to our continued growth and request by volunteer association groups that the City take over recreation programming. Successful candidates will demonstrate an ability to understand all aspects of recreation programming including planning, registration, scheduling, marketing, and evaluation. Strong communication skills are important to effectively coordinate activities between multiple departments and volunteer groups. Recreation programming is currently coordinated by the Corcoran Athletic Association, Corcoran Soccer Association, and other non-profit organizations with the assistance of City staff. Existing programs include youth baseball, youth softball, adult softball, annual community event, and night to unite event. This will be an exciting opportunity for an individual to take recreation programming to a new level and enhance services and recreation offerings for our growing community. An additional opportunity will be to assist in the design and development of a new City park. MISSION STATEMENT The City of Corcoran will provide high quality public services in a cost effective, responsible, and professional manner in order to create a preferred environment to live, work, play, and transact business. A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered BECOME A PART OF THE TEAM Team Values  Flexibility, Adaptability, Cooperation, and Creativity  Community Focus  Communication  Personal Accountability Vision Statement The City of Corcoran will provide high quality public services in a cost effective, responsible, and professional manner in order to create a preferred environment to live, work, play and transact business. Or visit http://bit.ly/2jQhoGC to download the application and supplemental questionnaire. Employees are under the direction of a Council-Administrator form of government. The team is comprised of 21 full-time staff members as well as part-time and seasonal employees. Recreation Coordinator THE ORGANIZATION Corcoran is a picturesque community located on the western edge of Hennepin County approximately 20 miles from Minneapolis. Corcoran is an attractive city of wooded countryside, wetlands, streams, farms and valleys. Corcoran is primarily a residential community with a population of approximately 5,500. Housing is composed of single family homes, farms, hobby farms and newer subdivisions which offer a variety of housing options. A significant portion of Corcoran is used for agricultural purposes. Corcoran’s land area encompasses 36 square miles. Communities surrounding Corcoran include Maple Grove, Plymouth, Medina, Loretto, Greenfield, Hanover, and Rogers. THE COMMUNITY The City of Corcoran is an Equal Opportunity Employer City of Corcoran 2018 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 12. January 27, 2018 – Goal and Vision Setting Session (12:00pm – 6:00pm) January 29, 2018 – Comprehensive Plan Open House (6:00pm – 8:00pm) February 8, 2018 Councilmember Bottema & Councilmember Keefe unable to attend  Ordinance Updates – Nuisance Language February 15, 2018  Comprehensive Plan Work Session – Review Draft Plan February 22, 2018 Jessica unable to attend  Planning Project Update  Planning Commission Report  Parks and Trails Commission Report  Development Agreement for Bass Lake Estates  2018-2019 Capital Improvement Plan  Equipment Purchase – Bobcat Loaders  EAW Review - Encore March 8, 2018  Allocating donation funds to Country Daze (requested by Chad in August 2017)  State Aid Project Options March 22, 2018  Planning Project Update  ESCI Report April 12, 2018 (Open Book meeting held in advance of Council meeting)  Financial Performance Report April 26, 2018  Planning Project Update  Code Compliance Quarterly Report  Approval Process and Financial Guarantee for Land Use Proposals