HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-05-05 Planning Commission Agenda PacketCITY OF CORCORAN
Corcoran Planning Commission Agenda
May 5, 2016 - 7:00pm
1. Call to Order / Roll Call
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Agenda Approval
4. Open Forum
5. Minutes
a. Minutes — April 7, 2016*
6. Unfinished Business
7. New Business
a. PUBLIC HEARING. Ordinance Amendment for Southeast and Downtown Design
Guidelines (city file 15 -021)*
i. Staff Report
ii. Open Public Hearing
iii. Public Comment
iv. Close Hearing
v. Commission Discussion & Recommendation
b. PUBLIC HEARING. Ordinance Amendment for Private Driveways (City file 16 -003)*
i. Staff Report
ii. Open Public Hearing
iii. Public Comment
iv. Close Hearing
v. Commission Discussion & Recommendation
8. Reports /Information
a. Planning Project Update*
b. City Council Report* — Council Liaison Guenthner
c. Other Business
9. Adjournment
*Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet by
Door.
5 a.
CITY OF CORCORAN
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES
7:00 PM - THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 2016
The Corcoran Planning Commission met on April 7, 2016, at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota.
Present were: Chair Jacobs, Commissioner Ravnholdt, Commissioner Wu, Commissioner Theis,
and Vice -chair Schultz.
Also present were: Administrator Martens, City Planner Lindahl, Code Compliance Official
Pritchard, and Council Liaison Thomas
1. Call to Order
Chair Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:00pm
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Open Forum — Mr. Phil Bongaarts, 19949 Larkin Rd, shared concerns regarding the
proposed Willow /Larkin paving project and future road realignment.
4. Chair and Vice -chair Elections
Motion made by Theis, seconded by Ravnholdt to elect Commissioner Jacobs as Chair
and Commissioner Schultz as Vice - chair. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and
Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0)
5. Approval of:
a. Agenda
Motion made by Ravnholdt seconded by Wu to approve the agenda as presented. Voting
Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0)
b. November 5, 2015 Planning Commission Minutes
Motion made by Theis seconded by Wu to approve the minutes as presented. Voting Aye:
Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0)
6. New Business
a. APPLICATION WITHDRAWN. Beacon Academy request for Preliminary Plat,
Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit (City file 16 -009).
Information Only
b. Ravinia 4t" Addition. Request from Lennar for PUD Final Plan Approval with
PUD modifications (City file no. 16 -004)
Staff Report — City Planner Lindahl presented her staff report.
ii. Public Comment
Paul Tabone, Lennar, clarified that the change in home styles was due to a
change in the market in which smaller lots, smaller homes, and smaller garages
were trending for young families and first -time move -up home buyers.
Mr. Tabone explained that the alteration to the cul de sac island design and lack
of irrigation was due to an oversite in the field in which irrigation was not
installed. The intention was to reuse stormwater to irrigate the cul de sac, much
like the boulevards. Lennar would like to avoid installing the irrigation system
and take a more eco- friendly, low- maintenance approach by installing a drought -
tolerant, low- maintenance grass cover. Lennar feels this is a better product for
the application as it will see harsh conditions due to snow storage, road salt, etc.
iii. Commission Discussion & Recommendation
The Commission requested that Lennar supply a rendering and some real -world
examples of the proposed cul de sac landscape design. They want to see proof
that the proposed design will work. The Commission agreed that the existing cul
de sac islands are not acceptable and must be changed, but that there is merit to
their new proposal. However, the proposal is lacking information and should the
proposal not be accepted, the original approvals should be enforced.
The Commission asked for clarification of the design of the new line of homes
and shared concerns with the smaller lots sizes and asked if the homes were of
less quality. Mr. Tabone stated that the home plans have been simplified to save
on construction and material cost, but that quality has not been changed. The
new line will have less base features, such as granite counters and stone facade
exteriors. Mr. Tabone confirmed that the new Discovery series will have a 40'
wide and 40' -42' deep foot print and that the smaller lots will accommodate the
homes and meet setbacks.
The Commission asked about the price range. Mr. Tabone stated that the homes
will start in the Low $300,000's and go up depending on finishes. He also shared
that this number was typical of similar product in the surrounding area and low for
the school district.
Staff clarified the previous PUD amendment included setback adjustments, but
that setbacks on smaller lots were not adjusted. It was also confirmed that the
Council recently showed support for 50' lots on a nearby proposed development.
Staff clarified the "Whitetail Trail" road design and suggested that condition 19 of
the resolution be stricken as the requirements were already met.
The Commission and Mr. Tabone discussed how the housing market guides their
design and Mr. Tabone shared that the target demographic is not concerned with
side yard setbacks and do not require the larger 3 stall garage.
The Commission asked for clarification on lots platted into wetlands. Staff
confirmed that the wetlands have a marked buffer area and are covered by a
drainage and utility easement.
Motion made by Ravnholdt seconded by Theis to recommend approval of the resolution
with corrections to the lot total, amendment to condition 15 to replace b. with language
that requires more information for the proposed design, and strike condition 19. Voting
Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, and Theis. Voting Nay: Schultz (Motion carried 4:1)
7. Reports:
a. Planning Project Update — Information Only
b. Council liaison expectations
The Commission discussed expectations for the Council liaison and stated that the
representation is a benefit, but that staff could act as the liaison. The Commission
ultimately deferred to the Council to make the decision on the merit of their
attendance.
c. City Council Report — Thomas
d. Other Business — None
8. Adjournment
Motion made by Ravnholdt seconded by Schultz to adjourn Voting Aye: Jacobs,
Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:32pm.
Submitted by
Mike Pritchard
Code Compliance Official
• -_
•
Agenda Item 5_a
L A. N D F 0 R M
•
from Situ ro fir?i.-b
•
105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612 - 252 -9070
Suite 513 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077
Minneapolis, MN 55401 www.landform.net
TO: Corcoran Planning Commission
FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform
DATE: April 27, 2016 for the May 5, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting
RE: Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines Update (city file no. 15 -021)
60 DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: N/A
1. Application Request
The City Council directed staff to update the Southeast District Plan and Design guidelines, which
were adopted in 2004 as Appendix A of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. Background
In 2004, the City of Corcoran adopted design guidelines for each of the three districts of the City
planned to get municipal sewer and water: the Southwest District, the Northeast District and the
Southeast District (including Downtown).
In 2011, the City adopted a new Comprehensive Plan and new ordinance standards to implement
the Comprehensive Plan.
In 2015, the City of Corcoran, in partnership with Hennepin County, began work to update the
existing design guidelines for the Southeast District. The Corcoran Southeast District Plan and
Downtown Design Guidelines are proposed to be modified to reflect the 2030 Future Land Use Plan
and other changes needed to implement the City's Vision.
3. Parks and Trails Commission
On April 19th the Parks and Trails Commission reviewed the materials and voted unanimously to
recommend approval.
4. Project Summary
The Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines are adopted as part of the Zoning Ordinance to
provide direction for how the City expects development to occur in this part of the City. The project
area is bounded by Rush Creek on the north, County Road 101 on the east, the Corcoran city
border on the south and a line running northwest generally from the intersection of
Hackamore /County Road 116 to the intersection of County Road 50 and Rush Creek. The
Southeast District includes a new Town Center and the Downtown Core on the east side of County
Road 116, which is a mixed -use district combining retail, office and service commercial with a mix of
low, medium and higher density residential.
Landform�, SensiblyGre 0 and Site to FinisW are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
•
•
•
•
This document is intended to be a guiding document for development in the Southeast District, and
as such, the document includes a mix of required standards and aspirational goals. The plan is
intended to guide landowners and developers on the City's expectations for development while
allowing flexibility for the market to determine the appropriate design details.
We are recommending that these new guidelines be adopted as a new Appendix B rather than simply
amending Appendix A due to the significant change in style and format. Appendix A (which includes
design guidelines for the Southwest District and the Northeast District) may be updated in a similar
format at a later date.
Process
The City Council established a community advisory committee (CAT) made up of eight residents
(two council members, two planning commissioners, two parks commissioners and two residents) to
lead this effort:
• Ron Thomas, City Council representative
• Tonya LaFave, City Council representative
• Dean Jacobs, Planning Commission representative
• Meredith Wu, Planning Commission representative
• Kevin Dale, Parks & Trails Commission representative
• Chad Robran, Parks & Trails Commission representative
• Dennis Stieg, citizen representative
• Greg Ebert, citizen representative
The City also hosted a website to provide information and gather feedback, asked for feedback via
an online survey (paper copies were also available at City Hall) and held two open houses to gather
feedback from the public. The current draft plan and design guidelines being reviewed tonight is a
result of their combined efforts.
Key Issues
a. Southeast District Master Plan
As part of the update process, the Southeast District boundaries were expanded to follow the MUSA
boundary in this part of the City. The plan eliminates the "Downtown District" of the current plan and
replaces it with two new nested subdistricts: Town Center and Downtown Core. The CAT wanted to
ensure that the design standards and scale were appropriate for each of these different areas. The
Downtown Core has the most detailed design guidelines as this is the area where the City hopes to
develop a traditional downtown with 2 -3 story buildings built to the street with parking in the back of
the buildings so that walkability is emphasized. The design standards are less restrictive in the Town
Center district but many of the same standards will be encouraged. Development outside of these
two subdistricts will generally follow the design standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance.
The master plan has many similarities to the current plan (adopted in 2004), but refines them to
better reflect the community's desire as stated in the new vision statement to "Create a complete
Southeast Design Guidelines (city file 15 -021)
April 19, 2016
•
i»
•
transportation network that balances pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular use with mix of residential
housing types, retail and an expanded employment base, while maintaining access to the natural
resources that define Corcoran's quality of life."
b. Transportation
A significant amount of discussion has occurred regarding the best methods to manage increased
development and traffic without overloading the existing transportation network. The CAT
reconfirmed the City's plans to reroute County Roads 10 and 50 to create safer, better managed
traffic flow and correct several difficult intersections. The plan reaffirms the realignment of these
streets as shown in the last two Comprehensive Plans. While several residents commented during
the open house that they were not in favor of one or both of these changes, the realignments have
been shown in City plans since at least 2001 and are recommended to remain on the plans even
though there are no current plans to make those changes. The realignments would likely be driven
by development.
County Road 116 will continue to be the central route through the Southeast District, but
improvements are planned for where County Road 116 passes through the Downtown Core. As
improvements are made to this road, emphasis should be placed on creating a pedestrian - friendly
environment. Enhancements to traffic controls, pedestrian connections, lighting, gateway elements
and landscaping at key intersections will serve that purpose. The County Road 116 corridor will be
designed with green boulevards on both sides, with particular attention given to the east side of the
road where a linear park with off -road trail is planned.
When developing the plan and design guidelines for the Southeast District (including the Town
Center and the Downtown Core), the CAT focused on providing an integrated transportation network
that provides safe, appealing and accessible routes to the Downtown Core for people walking and
biking, as well as people driving motor vehicles. A combination of off -road and on- street bike and
pedestrian facilities are included to give people safe and convenient options for active transportation.
As part of the update, the City established six main types of streets which are described and
illustrated in the document. Each serves a specific function toward the creation of a well- connected
and economically viable community:
1. County Road
2. Parkway Street
3. Bikeway Street
4. Main Street (Downtown Core)
5. Connector Street
6. Local Street
c. Parks and Trails
Special attention was given to providing parks in the Southeast District to serve the residents of the
district and the community as a whole. Several new parks are planned and strong pedestrian
connections a planned through an integrated network of sidewalks and trails. In addition to the parks
Southeast Design Guidelines (city file 15 -021)
April 19, 2016
0
shown in the Comprehensive Plan, the new Southeast District plan and design guidelines show the
addition of:
1. A linear park along the east side of County Road 116
2. A 4.2 acre town square in the Downtown Core
3. A new 3.5 +/- acre neighborhood park on the north side of the Town Center
4. A new 3 +/- acre neighborhood park on the south side of the Town Center
All of the new parks in this district would be developed when the adjacent property is developed. The
City would take the land dedication as part of a development proposal and would ultimately use park
dedication funds to make the planned improvements. We recommend that when the Comprehensive
Plan is next updated, the City consider amending the Parks chapter to reflect the changes shown in
the Southeast District Master Plan.
d. Land Use
There are no significant changes to the land use designations for the Southeast district, but there
are a few minor modifications. We recommend that when the Comprehensive Plan is next updated,
the City consider changing the Future Land Use Map to reflect the land uses as shown in the
Southeast District Master Plan.
e. Architecture
We did a visual preference survey with the participants at the initial community workshop and the
CAT recommended approval of language in the design guidelines to ensure that development meets
the City's vision. Many of these standards had been adopted as part of the DMU zoning district. Staff
is recommending that the performance standards in the DMU district be deleted and we have moved
the standards to the design guidelines to ensure they are appropriately applied in the subdistricts.
There are no significant changes to the development standards proposed.
We are also recommending changes to the DMU district to add land uses that were identified as
desirable uses in the Town Center and Downtown Core.
5. Action
Move to recommend approval of the following:
a. Ordinance Amending DMU district standards
b. Resolution approving Findings of Fact for amendment to DMU
c. Ordinance Amending Zoning Ordinance Appendix A
d. Resolution approving Findings of Fact for amendment to Appendix A
e. Ordinance Amending Zoning Ordinance Appendix B
f. Resolution approving Findings of Fact for amendment to Appendix B
Southeast Design Guidelines (city file 15 -021)
April 19, 2016
•
•
•
Attachments
a. Update Process Graphic
b. Ordinance Amending DMU district standards
c. Resolution approving Findings of Fact for amendment to DMU
d. Ordinance Amending Zoning Ordinance Appendix A
e. Resolution approving Findings of Fact for amendment to Appendix A
f. Ordinance Amending Zoning Ordinance Appendix B
g. Resolution approving Findings of Fact for amendment to Appendix BA
Southeast Design Guidelines (city file 15 -021)
April 19, 2016
Corcoran Southeast District Plan & Downtown Design Gui'del'ines Update
Community Advisory Team (CAT) Meeting #1
Monday, October 5, 2015, 5:30 -7:30 pm
Project launch, Visioning and
Strengths / Weaknesses /Opportunities /Threats Analysis (SWOT)
Workshop #1 - Tuesday, October 13, 2015, 5:30 -8:00 pm
Project launch, Visioning and
Strengths / Weaknesses /Opportunities /Threats Analysis (SWOT)
Next Step: Draft recommendations for Vision Statement and
Transportation Plan.
CAT Meeting #2
Monday, October 26, 2015, 5:30 -7:30 pm
Discuss SE Area and Downtown Vision
Next Step: Draft vision and goals statement, and develop concept
plan options for land use.
CAT Meeting #3
' Monday, January 11, 2016, 5:30 -7:30 pm
Test goals and concepts
Next Step: Draft design guidelines and district plans.
CAT Meeting #4
Monday, February 22, 2016, 5:30 -7:30 pm
Gather feedback on draft documents
Workshop #2 - Monday, March 14 f 2016, 5:30 -8:00 pm
IL I
0 Present draft guidelines
Next Step: Finalize design guidelines and district plans.
Adopt Final Master Plans and Guidelines, May 2016
• •
L A N D F O R M
•
LandformO and From Site to Finish@ are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. From Site to Finish
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
Motion By:
Seconded By:
Month day, 2016
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF SECTION 1040.130 OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE
CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN ZONING ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORCORAN ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Amendments. The text of Section 1040.130, Subd. 1 of Chapter 10 (Zoning
Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the semen material and
adding the underlined material as follows:
Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Downtown Mixed Use District is to provide for
the orderly and integrated development of a high quality downtown. The
Downtown Mixed Use District applies to those properties classified as Mixed
Use on the 2030 Future Land Use Plan and located on the east side of County
Road 116 on both sides of County Road 10. The Downtown Mixed Use
District will provide for the establishment of a community focal point which
is a blend of cultural, civic, entertainment, commercial, retail, residential and
office uses as defined and guided by the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
Residential multi - family uses shall be developed at a minimum of ten units
per acre or greater. New development within this district will be allowed
only when a full range of municipal services and facilities are available to
serve the area.
SECTION 2. Amendments. The text of Section 1040.130, Subd. 3 of Chapter 10 (Zoning
Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the see material and
adding the underlined material as follows:
Subd. 3. Application and Reference Materials.
The Downtown Mixed Use District is where development will be most
concentrated, and where controls are needed to produce the traditional
"Main Street" qualities that Corcoran is seeking. In addition to the
requirements of this Section, development in this area should comply with
the spirit and intent of the City's Design Guidelines; (Appendix A and B).
SECTION 3. Amendments. The text of Section 1040.130, Subd. 4 of Chapter 10 (Zoning
Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the men material and
adding the underlined material as follows:
Subd. 4. Permitted Uses.
A. Bakery, retail.
Page 1 of 9
City of Corcoran Month day, 2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
B. Banks, savings and loans, credit unions and other financial institutions
without drive - through.
C. Barbers, Beauty Shops and similar personal service uses.
D. Civic Buildings, such as City Hall, libraries, fire stations, etc.
E. Copy /print shop.
F. Day Care Facilities, State licensed, as defined by statute.
G. Dry cleaning and laundry pick up, incidental pressing and repair without
dry cleaning processing.
H. Dwelling, Attached.
I. Dwelling, Detached.
H- &Dwelling, Multiple Family with a minimum density of 10 units per net
acre, which may include units combining living and working space within
the unit, if all units on the same floor of a building are the same.
K. Dwelling, Senior.
I.L. Hotel, inns and bed and breakfast establishments.
�M. Offices, medical and professional.
-K-:N. Public parking ramp.
LO. Restaurants and cafes (without drive - through).
M-. P. Retail goods and service uses of a similar nature within a fully
enclosed building (without drive - through).
A.Q Taverns.
SECTION 4. Amendments. The text of Section 1040.130, Subd. 9 -13 of Chapter 10 (Zoning
Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the striGken material and
adding the underlined material as follows:
Page 2 of 9
City of Corcoran Month day, 2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
A. Developments that include public or- pFivate stFeets shall conneetwith
and provide for- the future extension of the community's street net...o
Page 3 of 9
City of Corcoran Month day, 2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
. A Feduction - vz- 'cr'p -cv twenty - L- cv7-- pci- Cc- nc- iz= rthe r "'u'rmczvci- v-rrcqu-i-rca - off
-
by the Zoning Administr-ateF in the Aef rsh-aFed paFlEing between
abutting uses of use of public-ally pFoyii-le ran.- Lirirr
.... ....
ra I T.lIm.
Page 4 of 9
City of Corcoran Month day, 2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
FeaF Td.
Page 5 of 9
aml
�1
I.
Page 5 of 9
�1
Page 5 of 9
City of Corcoran Month day, 2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
„ding , guided by *her ,.*
n this ce;An -,,,a the Design.
Guidelines in Appendix n
B. The aFehiteAUFal appeaFance, including building ehar-aeteF, ,
composition, and seale of all principal buildings shall comply
�MWMWMW
_el.
MIMI
Page 6 of 9
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
2. Complementary major- mateFial colors;
Month day, 2016
[ i =■:ssra: JOHMM32"M r:*sa eet*.rr TKW
rassts�e reserrr.�+.s�s��:e+ss�..
Page 7 of 9
moil-
NO
.�
rassts�e reserrr.�+.s�s��:e+ss�..
Page 7 of 9
moil-
rassts�e reserrr.�+.s�s��:e+ss�..
Page 7 of 9
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
Month day, 2016
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
TWOW
NEW 7-": 0
1 4119 4, 111 W
..
Subd. 4749. Area Requirements. The following minimum requirements shall be met in
the DMU district. Properties may be subject to special requirements for
overlay districts as noted in Section 1050 (Overlay Districts) and the Design
Guidelines (Appendix A and B ).:
Minimum lot area
20,000 s . ft.
Minimum lot width
NA
Minimum lot depth
NA
Principal Structure build -to lines:
From County Road 116
100 feet minimum
Front, From all other streets
15 feet maximum
Side
None
Rear
None
Adjacent to Residential
10 feet minimum
Page 8 of 9
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
Month day, 2016
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage.
VOTING AYE
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
VOTING NAY
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this XX day of May 2015.
Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor
ATTEST:
City Seal
Jessica Beise — City Clerk /Administrative Services Coordinator
Page 9 of 9
City of Corcoran
2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -xx
Motion By:
Seconded By:
month day,
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
TEXT OF SECTION 1040.130 OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE,
ENTITLED CORCORAN ZONING ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran initiated an amendment to update the Southeast District and
Downtown Design Guidelines in Appendix A of the Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, in 2011 the City adopted Zoning Ordinance updates to reflect the 2030
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Downtown Mixed Use Zoning District incorporated a number of design
standards and performance standards that replicate the standards in the Design Guidelines;
and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to avoid repetition or conflict within the ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly
called Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Zoning Ordinance text
amendment based on the finding that the proposed amendments would be consistent with State
law and the City's Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code.
Page 1 of 2
City of Corcoran
2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
VOTING AYE
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -xx
VOTING NAY
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
month day,
Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this XXth day of May 2016.
Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor
ATTEST:
City Seal
Jessica Beise — City Clerk /Administrative Services Coordinator
Page 2 of 2
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
Motion By:
Seconded By:
Month day, 2016
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF APPENDIX A (DESIGN GUIDELINES) OF
CHAPTER 10 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN ZONING
ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORCORAN ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Amendments. The text of Appendix A of Chapter 10 (Zoning Ordinance) of the
Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the str+eken material and adding the underlined
material as follows:
See Attachment A
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage.
VOTING AYE
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
VOTING NAY
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this XX day of May 2015.
Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor
ATTEST:
City Seal
Jessica Beise — City Clerk /Administrative Services Coordinator
Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX A - Design Guidelines
Recommendations for Overall Design Standards
OBJECTIVES
The objective for developing design guidelines for the City of Corcoran is to establish:
A clear definition of urban design objectives that informs citizens, developers, and
decision - makers.
• A tool that designers can use to incorporate general and specific approaches and
techniques in their plans that will achieve City design objectives.
A basis for uniform and consistent review of development proposals by the City
Council and Planning Commission.
The Corcoran General Design Guidelines should meet the following goals:
Goal 1: Preserve the unique, rural character of Corcoran.
Goal 2: Establish a consistent, high quality baseline design standard for all districts.
Goal 3: Maintain a high quality, harmonious visual environment.
Goal 4: Communicate the community's expectations for new development in Corcoran.
APPLICATION
The design guidelines are intended to be applied in all districts where a District Plan has
been developed. These guidelines are designed to be complimentary to the District Plans,
the existing Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Map, and Zoning Ordinances. Illustrations
have been included to further explain the design guideline intent.
ORGANIZATION
The District Plans and Design Guidelines begin with General Design Guidelines which apply
across all districts. This general Section is followed by the District Design Guidelines and
District Plans which are specific to the three districts in the City of Corcoran - Southwest,
Northeast and Southeast. District Design Guidelines are applied in addition to the General
Design Guidelines, and address unique conditions or uses in that District. The Southwest,
Northeast, and Southeast District Plans accompany the Design Guidelines for each District.
These build on the concepts identified in the Comprehensive Plan.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 1
September 25, 2014
The Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines also include the Downtown Illustrative
Plan and Downtown Design Guidelines which are also applied in addition to the General
Design Guidelines and the Southeast District Design Guidelines.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 2
September 25, 2014
General Design Guidelines
Recommendations for Overall Design Standards
GENERAL
• All new development should be designed to value, respect and preserve Corcoran's
identified natural features and resource corridors.
• Rural view sheds and identified view corridors should be preserved and maintained
wherever possible as important contributors to Corcoran's character.
• All new development should provide for pedestrian as well as vehicle circulation,
and shall create links to existing and proposed sidewalks and trails.
• All new development should be sensitive to existing residences in the design and
location of new uses and buildings with respect to shading, viewsheds, and potential
light and noise pollution. Where necessary, appropriate screening or buffering shall
be provided.
• New business parks should not be designed only for larger businesses, but should
also accommodate the small and mid -sized businesses that enhance Corcoran's
rural community.
STREETS, PUBLIC SPACE AND AMENITIES
• All arterial roads should have a minimum 100 -foot setback to preserve a rural road
character. This area shall be maintained as a natural buffer preserving mature trees
and shrubs, with native grasses and wildflowers encouraged.
• Along County Road 116 a rural greenway is proposed with trails and amenities.
New development along this route will be required to continue the greenway
throughout Corcoran based on the City's design.
• Key intersections have been identified as primary entrances to Corcoran and should
be designed as "gateways" to the City; gateway elements could include open space,
unique landscaping, walls or gates, City identity signage and water features.
• Direct access for new developments should be restricted on Highway 55 and County
Roads 101 and 116; driveways serving only one parcel or use should be prohibited
along these roads.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 3
September 25, 2014
• Direct access from County Road 30 and the new alignment of County Road 50
should be limited. Driveways serving only one parcel or use are highly discouraged
in along these roads.
• Through roads with connections to existing roads are encouraged; streets with cul-
de -sacs should be limited.
• All residential development should seek to preserve and maintain some natural
open space; larger developments will be required to designate common areas for
residents shared use and /or to identify and preserve land for a neighborhood park.
SITE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Marker with
incorporated
signage
Welcoming design element
combines wall and
landscaping with signage
• Well - landscaped open areas should be provided at the main road entryway to new
developments; gateway or welcoming design elements, including water or
landscape features, signage and lighting are encouraged.
_ = 6S� (l M1«` More formal and
MEET f�1 0 N� h Trail or
groomed
Sidewalk landscaping
11 Filtration
Stormwater Vegetation
Holding Pond
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 4
September 25, 2014
• Preserve and maintain identified natural resource areas, existing healthy areas of
native vegetation, mature trees, wetlands, ponds, and other natural features to the
extent possible; design which harmonizes more groomed and landscaped areas with
more natural landscape is encouraged.
• Site design that integrates identity signage and lighting into the landscape is
encouraged.
• Provide for both private and common or public open spaces; connections from open
spaces to existing or proposed trails and sidewalk networks are encouraged.
• Limit parking provided between buildings and the main road; distribute parking
around the building, especially to the side and back of buildings.
Landscaped edge that combines
fence with trees, low shrubs and
ground cover for parking lot
screening and buffering along
sidewalk
• Parking areas should be well - landscaped and screened from the street; larger
parking areas should be planned with internal landscaping and divided into smaller
areas where possible.
Buildings should be oriented to minimize views of service areas, loading docks and
equipment from the street and other developments; these views can be buffered
with a combination of landscaping and screening; trash areas should not be visible
from the street; where this is not possible they must be fully screened and buffered
to mitigate the noise and visual impacts.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 5
September 25, 2014
Trail or sidewalk
awaicN piQiiLcu an. a rain garden; plants
and soil provide filtration
Stormwater ponds, dry ponds and other stormwater management or holding areas
shall be designed to be attractive in both flooded and dry conditions; use of native
plants for filtration around pond and wetlands is encouraged.
• Sustainable design approaches to site and landscape design, especially for storm
water management and water shed quality is encouraged.
All landscaping shall preserve and enhance natural features (such as wetlands,
drainage ways, mature stands of trees, and the like), enhance architectural features,
strengthen vistas and important amenities and provide shade.
ARCHITECTURE
• Buildings should be constructed and maintained for permanence and longevity -
durable, maintainable materials should be used; temporary buildings, metal sheds,
etc. shall not be permitted except when allowed as accessory buildings.
• Buildings should be designed to relate well to the existing environment, both
natural and man -made, and consider context in massing, materials, style and color.
• Design of the landscape and hardscape should be coordinated and harmonious with
the building design and materials.
• Multi- family buildings should be designed to provide both private and common
outside space and units with terraces, balconies or other private exterior space are
encouraged. Orientation of building and unit entrances, windows, garages, etc.
should be considered for visual and acoustic privacy.
• Buildings should be oriented and designed to consider sun and shade, wind
exposure and snow drifting to avoid creating icy or dangerous conditions.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 6
September 25, 2014
N
Entry feature; well distinguished
and covered from the weather
Awning with accent lighting
and graphics instead of
applied signs
Iststory with glazed
display windows
• Building entries should be visible from the main street or entry route, and
distinguished from the building facade; entrance areas should be well lit, covered or
protected from weather, and include significant glazing and glass doors where the
public will be entering buildings.
Cornice or roof line
Well defined roof line
and overhang
expression
Maximize glazing,
especially on front
facade
Expressed base and
cap
• Buildings should be designed with quality materials on all sides; all facades shall be
articulated with a variety of materials, glazing or other details to add visual interest,
although the front facade may have a unique design or more significant glazing; long
blank exterior surfaces shall be avoided.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 7
September 25, 2014
Rooftop equipment shall be screened
from the line of site of pedestrians and
integrated into the design and massing
of the roof form
• �' rj
Retail /Commercial Building
• Equipment, mechanical systems, transformers, etc. must be screened from view in a
way that is integral to the architecture of the building. Screening should be
accomplished with materials similar to or compatible with materials used on the
main structure; metal fencing or mechanical vent screens alone are not sufficient.
Roof line —
parapet or
enlarged
cornice
r Finish
materials on
all side
Retail /Commercial
Building
f
architectural pier
architectural pier — element
is constructed in 3
dimensions with finish
materials on all sides
• Roof lines and cornice details shall be completed in a 3- dimensional manner so that
the back of roof features or similar unfinished areas are not visible.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 8
September 25, 2014
Projecting
or Hangir
Sign
Wall S
integrated
into
building
design
Pedestrian - Oriented Tenant Signs
Awning Sign
Window Signs
• Signage and lighting which is integrated into the design of the building is
encouraged.
Regional Architectural Styles. The
design of buildings, particularly
important civic buildings, shall
reflect regional traditions.
Agrarian Style
IMiN M. �•
I&�[i3 Ili;
Prairie Styl-e
--
• Architecture of new buildings should be respectful of the existing agricultural and
historical structures which enhance the rural character of Corcoran; design which
reflects the elements of vernacular prairie -style or agrarian architecture is
encouraged.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 9
September 25, 2014
District Design Guidelines
District Descriptions and Recommendations for District Specific Design Standards
District Plan follows:
Southwest District Design Guidelines
The Southwest District offers Corcoran the opportunity to establish a "gateway" to the City
on State Highway 55 at County Road 19. Development in this district should be of the type
and quality that will add significant value for the City. The District Plan calls for high
quality business parks along Highway 55 and County Road 19, with well - landscaped
setbacks and buffers. The presence of a major natural resource corridor creates the
opportunity for mixed residential development offering a mix of housing types and
densities while preserving significant natural features.
SITE DEVELOPMENT
• Site design and landscaping should be designed to work with the existing
topography of this area, preserving the rolling hills and natural view corridors.
• Commercial areas should be designed as high quality business parks, with
appropriate office, commercial and light industrial uses.
• New residential development should include a range of housing types (townhouses
as well as single- family attached and detached) and densities.
• New residential development should reserve land for a neighborhood park as well
as "natural open space "; these spaces should be linked to the trail system.
STREETS AND PUBLIC AMENITIES
• The intersection of County Road 19 and State Highway 55 should be developed as a
"gateway" to the City of Corcoran with appropriate open space and gateway
elements, such as identity signage, lighting, landscape and water features. The
design should express the unique character of Corcoran's rural community.
• Driveways and other direct access from new developments to State Highway 55
shall not be permitted. New access roads shall be provided for access to properties
that currently front the highway.
• Access shall be from a new road network, for both business park and residential
uses, with connections to existing roads; cul -de -sacs are discouraged.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 10
September 25, 2014
GR
Sc
.AugUtL f. Zuua
pa i by Landrum
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 11
September 25, 2014
District Design Guidelines
Descriptions and Recommendations for District Specific Design Standards
District Plan follows:
Northeast District Design Guidelines
At one of the major entrances to the City of Corcoran, the Northeast District Plan
establishes a gateway to the community that reflects the City's rural character. The plan
offers opportunities for expanded tax base, jobs and services by taking advantage of Maple
Grove's nearby higher density development. The primary entry into the Northeast District
is County Road 30, where a mixed -use PUD (planned unit development) will combine a mix
of low and medium density residential with mixed -use commercial, including
neighborhood retail, service retail, commercial and office uses. The edge of the district
along County Road 101 is planned primarily for high quality business parks, with some
destination commercial or retail uses closer to the County Road 30 intersection.
GENERAL SITE DEVELOPMENT
• The commercial area along County Road 101 should be designed as high quality
business parks, with appropriate office, commercial and light industrial uses.
• Retail uses should be limited to the commercial area indicated near the County Road
101 and 30 intersection or included within the County Road 30 mixed -use PUD area.
• Within the PUD, residential development should provide for life -cycle housing for
empty nesters, retirees, and first -time home buyers with a range of housing types
(condominiums, townhouses, and single- family attached) and densities.
STREETS, TRAILS, PARKS AND PUBLIC AMENITIES
• County Road 30 is a major entry point into the City of Corcoran, which warrants a
unique design treatment as it meets County Road 101; this intersection should be
developed as a "gateway" with significant landscaped open space and appropriate
entry elements; the design should express the unique character of Corcoran.
County Road 30 from County Road 116 to County Road 101 should be developed as
a green corridor with landscaped setback, center boulevard and other
enhancements that will express a sense of entry while maintaining an open, rural
road character.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 12
September 25, 2014
• Enhancements at the intersection of County Roads 116 and 30 should be designed
similar to major County Road 116 intersections in the downtown and southeast
district.
• The County Road 116 rural greenway should continue north through this district,
with trail connections to new civic or community spaces as well as retail or
destination uses within the PUD.
• Mixed commercial- retail within the PUD should be designed around public or
common areas that are linked by trails or sidewalks. The design should also include
sidewalks and trails to connect neighborhood retail and public spaces to the
adjacent residential neighborhoods.
• Mixed -use and new residential development within the PUD should include a
designated neighborhood park in addition to natural open space (woods, wetlands,
meadows, etc.).
• The planned extension of County Road 117 to County Road 101 should be planned
and designed in a way that is sensitive to existing residential uses in that area.
Direct access for new developments should be limited on County Roads 101, 116 and 30.
Future plans for access on these roads should balance traffic demand and future
development.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 13
September 25, 2014
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 14
September 25, 2014
■
P KIM
I
IN
IM .,
IN
r-1i .�.aeae.. ■ .zr��.. . rsse�:ir.E�:s��et
pli
•.
•.
........ . ....................
P KIM
I
IN
IM .,
r-1i .�.aeae.. ■ .zr��.. . rsse�:ir.E�:s��et
pli
•.
•.
........ . ....................
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 15
September 25, 2014
-�-
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 15
September 25, 2014
rni�re:*:se.*:erer.�sr..�:rrs
P. . "MANO:r.M
. . ............. ...........
...... I
I.I.M. Mul-11-1.
..
.-IMMONFRIIIII
+: rr�: ...e. r. �■+. erwoffr.nwnm ovwgn
WOMMMM:■
. . ............. ...........
...... I
I.I.M. Mul-11-1.
+: rr�: ...e. r. �■+. erwoffr.nwnm ovwgn
WOMMMM:■
. . ............. ...........
...... I
I.I.M. Mul-11-1.
. �eee+. t■.. n*. f :rarrriss�r.�+.s+.!�:e�r�.�r:■. .
A.
A
. . ............. ...........
...... I
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 16
September 25, 2014
Mixed use, commercial and Fetail within the downtown PUD should be designed
tr-ails. This netwoFk of open spaee should include for-mal plazas, squares and
gar-dens, designated paFks and infor-mal landscaped gFeens, in addition to ME)r-e
natural aFeas of „pen space (woods, wetlands, m -,aows etc- +
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 17
September 25, 2014
ML
W.
i. aw.
Mixed use, commercial and Fetail within the downtown PUD should be designed
tr-ails. This netwoFk of open spaee should include for-mal plazas, squares and
gar-dens, designated paFks and infor-mal landscaped gFeens, in addition to ME)r-e
natural aFeas of „pen space (woods, wetlands, m -,aows etc- +
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 17
September 25, 2014
. .
MM
I Maw
NOW
E11.'Rl:f.�M-5 .t' am'.T.r'JP��'r�El:*:
. ......... .
NMI
-
-
NOW
E11.'Rl:f.�M-5 .t' am'.T.r'JP��'r�El:*:
. ......... .
NMI
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 18
September 25, 2014
9111111111M 1111111 RE 1111 1111 ......
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 18
September 25, 2014
« n
CommeFcial development should be clesigned with a traditional ch- Fader• and quality; two and three story buildings a encouraged.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 19
September 25, 2014
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 20
September 25, 2014
■.
•
■.
■.
OF" . •
•
EMA
I P11 11111
■
M. ~111
A
III Ill.
w
Emu.
M
-T�M-
1111.111f
P". 11MMIRM
■.
•
■.
■.
■.
EMA
.
■
III Ill.
w
Emu.
M
I MN
■.
•
..
■
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 21
September 25, 2014
■.
■.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 21
September 25, 2014
■ . .resr IMMn■
FrAMPM9c
.
M,
I MN�11' 11011111111
111 __N I ■ •
NVIAUP.T�fCWHI
■.
■
M,
I MN�11' 11011111111
111 __N I ■ •
NVIAUP.T�fCWHI
■
■•■
New auto dominated COMPA-p-rc-i development such as fast food, gas, oF similaF
drive up or- drive through facilities are discour-aged in .1.,...nt.,wn
■.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 22
September 25, 2014
IM
...sy
The linear- Town Square is conceived as a community focal point with passive uses
(gFeens, gaFdens) and active uses (gazebo, bandshell) are ineoFpor-ated into the
design. Mixed use buildings line the square, Nvith 4ont dooF pai!king pr-oviEled to
encourage str-olling and shopping.
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 23
September 25, 2014
11 N WARTMMMUMN
it i
i
11
• 1TAFLTM
HVISTM
IF
On street par-16'... ."- _. aged on streets within the downtown. Streets should be
designed . pa.k.i., with the paFking zone defined eitheF by ewbing oF Nvith a
nhange in pnirrt mntrtrin�c
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 24
September 25, 2014
it i
i
........... . .
On street par-16'... ."- _. aged on streets within the downtown. Streets should be
designed . pa.k.i., with the paFking zone defined eitheF by ewbing oF Nvith a
nhange in pnirrt mntrtrin�c
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 24
September 25, 2014
........... . .
..........
On street par-16'... ."- _. aged on streets within the downtown. Streets should be
designed . pa.k.i., with the paFking zone defined eitheF by ewbing oF Nvith a
nhange in pnirrt mntrtrin�c
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 24
September 25, 2014
��t•� ��■ nste. �:, se. ���r��. �: en�■: � :�:r:�sr:r.*:�:�e�:e�ss*:■:enn EL a
Mechanical equipment, seFvic-e and tFash areas must be fully enclosed a
,ntegF to ;,-t., the -Architecture -and Fn tor;alS AfthP h1lil.l;,,.T
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 25
September 25, 2014
111,11,111,11111" MILL-M, =ILZA.-JUJU� i
I
un _ — —
Mechanical equipment, seFvic-e and tFash areas must be fully enclosed a
,ntegF to ;,-t., the -Architecture -and Fn tor;alS AfthP h1lil.l;,,.T
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 25
September 25, 2014
I
Mechanical equipment, seFvic-e and tFash areas must be fully enclosed a
,ntegF to ;,-t., the -Architecture -and Fn tor;alS AfthP h1lil.l;,,.T
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 25
September 25, 2014
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 26
September 25, 2014
IN
MIN
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 26
September 25, 2014
1
- IIII '�•S,
s�
■ ,I'I
■
Downtown Area Plan
r iN".. 1. ktic
ML
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 27
September 25, 2014
Appendix A (Design Guidelines) Page 28
September 25, 2014
City of Corcoran
2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -xx
Motion By:
Seconded By:
month day,
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
TEXT OF APPENDIX A (DESIGN GUIDELINES) OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE CORCORAN
CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN ZONING ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran initiated an amendment to update the Southeast District and
Downtown Design Guidelines in Appendix A of the Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines are formatted
differently than the adopted guidelines for the Southwest and Northeast districts; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to update the ordinance in increments; and
WHEREAS, the City will adopt new standards for the Southeast District as Appendix B of the
Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly
called Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Zoning Ordinance text
amendment based on the finding that the proposed amendments would be consistent with State
law and the City's Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code.
VOTING AYE
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
VOTING NAY
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this XXt" day of May 2016.
Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor
ATTEST:
City Seal
Jessica Beise — City Clerk /Administrative Services Coordinator
Page 1 of 1
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
Motion By:
Seconded By:
Month day, 2016
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE CORCORAN CITY
CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORCORAN ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Amendments. The text of Chapter 10 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code
is hereby amended by adding a new Appendix B:
See Attachment A
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage.
VOTING AYE
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
VOTING NAY
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this XX day of May 2015.
Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor
ATTEST:
City Seal
Jessica Beise — City Clerk /Administrative Services Coordinator
Page 1 of 1
Appendix
Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Table of Contents
Southeast District Overview 15
Purpose
Application
Southeast District Vision
Sites and Structures
Southeast District Principles 7
Landscaping and Screening
Signage and Gateways
Parks, Trails and Public Space
Healthy Communities 125
Town Center 127
Overview
Buildings - Placement, Massing and
Height
Screening and Loading
Facades
Streets
Parking and Access
Landscaping and Screening
Downtown Core 137
Overview
Vision
Site Development
Buildings - Placement, Massing and
Height
Streetscape
Parking
Public Art
Signage
Plazas
Implementation 143
DRAFTApr12 -16 13
For review only
4�
S�UJI "s�
PmrArtY
N ,
�r
Southeast District Analysis Map. Future infrastructure
improvements in the district include rerouting County Roads 50 and 10 to provide
safer access points. The existing trail system will be supplemented by a network
of on- and off -road trails.
Natural assets including wetlands, creeks and uplands, woodlands and savannah
provide a framework and inspiration for development aesthetics.
A new water tower is planned within the district. There are several potential
locations where it could go and the location will be determined as development
occurs. A sanitary line is also in place to serve the future Town Center.
c �-r
Lily Hell i
6tarcu?rinl Park
C
Church R
'
CAMOWV
r,�
y
1
�i ......
•.I.AY
LEGEND
Southeast District Boundary
^� Town Center
"' • • •" Downtown Core
die
�•� �► Existing Downtown
+rR
'r ■ ■ ■ ■ Future Road
_ (approximate realignment)
Floodplain
Upland Plant Communities
_ Maple /Basswood
Disturbed Woodland
Savanna /Pasture
Wetland Communities
Wet Prairie
Emergent
■ Shrub
' Floodplain Forest
Open Water
Floodplain, Reed Canary
Dominant
• NP / Neighborhood Park
OSP / Nature Park
R: Creek
• ASA / Athletic Search Area
City of Corcoran
Existing and Proposed Trails
(proposed are dashed)
11111!1 Potential Natural Gas
Pipeline Easement Trail
.......... On Road Trail
.minus. Off Road Trail
Potential Water Tower
-►� 1 As -Built Sanitary Line
Not To Scale
Southeast District Objectives
1. The Southeast District has key
transportation corridors within the City
of Corcoran which provide vehicle,
bicycle and pedestrian connections to
adjacent communities.
2. The Southeast District is home to
Corcoran Community Park.
3. The Southeast District includes a
variety of businesses that provide
retail and services that support the
daily needs of residents.
4. The Southeast District includes
a Town Center with retail, office,
housing, public spaces, and
employment opportunities.
5. The Southeast District provides life -
cycle housing opportunities that are
within walking and biking distance of
Downtown.
6. The Southeast District provides
a concentration of urban housing
options, so that the majority of the City
can remain rural.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Southeast District Overview
In 2015, the City of Corcoran, in partnership with Hennepin County, began work to update the
existing design guidelines and master plan for the Southeast District. The Corcoran Southeast
District Plan and Design Guidelines were modified to reflect the 2030 Future Land Use Plan and
other changes needed to implement the City's Vision.
The Southeast District is the historic heart of the City. The intersection of County Road 10
and County Road 116 is a historic crossroads and this area is home to the existing city
hall, St. Thomas Catholic Church and the existing business park. The Southeast District is
also beginning to see the residential development that has long been anticipated with the
development of Lennar's "Ravinia" neighborhood. The Town Center (including the Downtown
Core) within the Southeast District is a mixed -use district combining retail, office and service
commercial with a mix of low, medium and higher density residential. The planned development
is balanced by extensive open space and natural resources, including two golf courses (Rush
Creek & Shamrock), Lions Park, Corcoran Community Park, the City Hall park and the Rush
Creek corridor.
Purpose
The primary purpose of Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines is to set
basic parameters, describe preferences and illustrate design intent. These guidelines serve
as principles within which creative design can and should occur — there is no one solution, but
many options that meet the basic requirements of this document.
Application
The format and content are specifically tailored for use as a supplement to the Zoning
Ordinance. This master plan provides illustrative guidance for building locations and orientation.
Any changes to this approved master plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Council
as part of the development application.
Southeast District Vision
Create a complete transportation network that balances pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular
use with mix of residential housing types, retail and an expanded employment base, while
maintaining access to the natural resources that define Corcoran's quality of life.
Overview 15
Southeast District Concept Plan. The Southeast District is the spatial
framework for these design standards. The Town Center and Downtown Core are
nested within the district each with additional guidance to create the neighborhoods
and places envisioned by the community.
P1 Meister Road / Future CR 10 L
■
■
■
■
■
r
■
e`
LEGEND
Southeast District Boundary
Town Center
..... • ... Downtown Core
■ ■ ■ ■ Future Road
(approximate realignment)
Land Use Classification
Retail Uses
. Commercial
Mixed Use
Residential
. High Density Res.
- Medium Density Res.
Mixed Residential
Low Density Residential
Existing and Future
Public
. Public / Semi - Public
. Golf Course
Parks / Open Space
Agriculture
Agricultural Preserve
Industrial
nIndustrial
Not To Scale
61 District Principles
9C
�S
r
+
- 44 LFuture -
School
Properly
Community
Existing CR 50 4woklik ,�* 1 4
9ris
1
. - - I'll
Larkin Road / Future CR
I!
i
f Rush Cr�k
Park
Shamrock Golf Course
Rush Creek Golf Club
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Southeast District Principles
Sites and Structures
The Southeast District should continue to provide a mix of residential, commercial, office and
industrial uses as described in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The Design
Guidelines for the district shall be the same as those described in the Zoning Ordinance for the
zoning district in which the development is located and these Design Standards will provide an
additional layer of standards.
New residential development should provide for the full range of life cycle housing, offering
choices of housing types at low, medium and higher densities.
Within the Southeast District, the combination of site and building design should provide
a visual cue that this is a unique place. For single family, twin and townhome structures,
architecture styles including: Agrarian Contemporary, Farmhouse, and Arts & Crafts - Prairie are
encouraged, as is the use of regional building materials and native plants. Development in this
district should be thoughtfully designed to reflect Corcoran's rural character.
DRAFT Apr12 -16 District Principles 17
For review only
F FOR ■ rt '
r JOB on
swam
Agrarian Contemporary
Agrarian Contemporary style homes rely on simple forms with strong roof lines and inviting front
porches. This style is a clean, crisp, more contemporary version of the Agrarian Rural style.
Typical style elements include:
• Form and Roof
• Simple roof design, front to back gable or side to side
• 5:12 to 12:12 roof pitches
• Overhang eaves
• Walls and Windows:
• Details
• Horizontal or board and batten siding, stucco or a combination
• Symmetrical placement and distinct fenestration rhythms
• Square, circular or 2:1 proportioned vertical rectangular windows with grid
patterns
• Porches with simple columns, trim and railings
• Minimal door and window trim detailing
• Dormers, cupolas, shutters, exposed rafter tails
81 District Principles DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Farmhouse
Farmhouse style is comfortable and practical. It is a hybrid of elements
brought together by regional craftsmen and traditions of the early 20th
century. Typical style elements include:
• Form and Roof
• Two story
• Asymmetrical, angular design with tall proportions.
• Gable roof
• 8:12 or greater roof pitch
• Overhang eaves
• Wood or asphalt shingled roof
• Walls and Windows:
• Details
• Wood cladding with horizontal, diagonal or vertical
layout
• Tall rectangular windows with large panes
• Decorative braces and brackets
• Plain trim boards and soffits
• Corbels and gable trusses
• Wrap porches
• Geometric patterns
• Embellished porch railings
DRAFT Apr12 -16 District Principles 19
For review only
Arts & Crafts - Prairie
Prairie Style is truly American, derived by Frank Lloyd Wright and Louis
Sullivan. Typical style elements include:
• Form and Roof
• Low pitched roof with wide overhanging eaves
• Massive square porch supports
• Two stories with one story porches or wings
• Gable roof edges flattened
• 3- 112:12 or greater roof pitch
• Hipped roof
• Walls and Windows:
• Details
• Horizontal windows, sometimes wrapping around
corners
• Tall casement windows
• Geometric patterns of small -pane windows
• Detail emphasizing horizontal lines
• Contrasting wood trim
• Horizontal patterns in wall materials
• Window boxes
• Ornamentation at the door or cornice line
• Flattened pedestal urns
101 District Principles DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Street Hierarchy
One significant development consideration in this district is increasing the intensity of use
without overloading the existing transportation network. Current plans to reroute County Roads
10 and 50 will create safer, better managed traffic flow and correct several difficult intersections.
County Road 116 will continue to be the central route through the Southeast District, but
improvements are planned for where County Road 116 passes through the Town Center. As
improvements are made to this road, emphasis should be placed on creating a pedestrian -
friendly environment. Enhancements to traffic controls, pedestrian connections, lighting,
gateway elements and landscaping at key intersections will serve that purpose. The County
Road 116 corridor should be designed with green boulevards on both sides, with particular
attention given to the east side of the road where a linear park with off -road trail is planned.
Where County Road 116 passes through the Town Center, this road should shift to the east
to allow for a center landscaped boulevard and other enhancements that will express a sense
of Town Center identity. The intersections of County Road 116 and Larkin Road (new County
Road 50), and County Road 116 and City Hall Drive (proposed new road just south of City Hall)
mark the entry points into this area, and the start of the proposed boulevard. The design of
these intersections should balance the needs of traffic and pedestrians. The City will continue
to work with Hennepin County to ensure future improvements are consistent with City's vision
as well as the County policy related to Complete Streets. As part of this vision, the city will look
for opportunities to provide grade- separated pedestrian crossings in addition to the at -grade
crossings.
The existing road network should be maintained as a continuous network, with new connections
where needed. Cul -de -sacs are strongly discouraged in the Town Center. Cul -de -sacs should
be avoided throughout the Southeast District in favor of connecting streets that will facilitate
resilient multi -modal routes within the district.
The Southeast District has six main types of streets which are described and illustrated on the
following pages. Each serves a specific function toward the creation of a well connected and
economically viable Southeast District.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Street Connectivity. Aconnected network
of streets provides system resiliency and greater
capacity with the same lane miles. Top: Connected
Network is preferred. Bottom: Sparse Hierarchy with
cul -de -sacs is not desirable.
District Principles 111
Meister Road 1 Future CR 10
f�
S�
Existing CR K
Grade separated
pedestrian crossing
1 I
I I
Larkin Road I Future CR 50
Flaseshce Trail
12 1 District Principles
I
I
W.
1.
I
Southeast District Street Types Map.
ROW
County Road 120 feet
Parkway Street
72 feet
Bikeway Street
72 feet
Main Street (Downtown Core)
70 feet
Connector Street
60 feet
Local Street
50 feet
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
I 1
I I
La �_____ —_�
Not To Scale
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
M
cn
s
m
v �
O O
M
M
0
v 'i s
c
m
0
�m
�0
00 w
m
W CD
tvm'CD
oo�I�
CD
Cn
D
C I
� N_
fv
N W
cc
7
m
m
■ ■
a■ a■
In s■
z Cr O S O S 0 CCDD O-0 N
°
C
(1 _
D
� N
Z]
In
x
O
o(
M W °- CD
�,
CD
CD ■ I .
N�
. 0C �
D W
•
ID
� sn 'C') 0 :3
a
'p O CD
.y
ID s
3 . Q
Q
CD y m Q< %0
NCDN
_
CD 7 S_ O �. C7 O C2 CD
rt
m
m
■ ■
a■ a■
In s■
z Cr O S O S 0 CCDD O-0 N
°
D
�° m Qa o rt O
v � (Z 0 :3 o <D
cn
n
CO w�
COL o
o(
M W °- CD
�,
. 0C �
� sn 'C') 0 :3
a
.y
ID s
3 . Q
Q
CD y m Q< %0
_
CD 7 S_ O �. C7 O C2 CD
rt
° cc' Z
-o < C 5 �. Q.
rn CD S m v Q O .
E o v s
3 O E3 C 5. D CD O N CD N W
CD
ID 0 Ln_ CD
CD m Q a- ' E O
. O
O :E `G � N O O
� M N
.< M CL C2 C1 W M N O M O- O - n n .'•F
C' S - 7 CD C
r
.-�-. CD - In
E O co O
S 1< O n -6 CD S 7
�.
v rnA
COED
N iv
S O N O Q O O C1
O
O O D 0 CD c= O) o ;;U
°
DCL o
O :
c
s"N
v
is
CD
o
Q m
m cQ 3 n :3 =3
1
CD CD (D ;a tl COD ,�.• N
Q
C 7 CD n CD
O O S"
CD CD (fl CD O M N CL] CD
CO Q N
Cy Cn O CD CL] `< N N `G
m
CD R CD
O
O O Q :E :3 CD O
C1 S
o
A
Q m" °' m CD m w vdi
N CD
t(]
Q m
N
O
cp CD C) * CD 0 M
=3 _ —" 0) x O
3
CO Q����
� � � Q ;:a�
a - 3 a Q
o tT o 0 q Cn
� CD v m CD s
cD Z v °c CD CL
CD S i n sv M:
S ID
COD n CD O Q (n
N
CD
(N
N CD N CD a%•
O n O v Z
CCD
N
7 S
CD CD � n ID
N CD S CD
OL
O m O
C 3 S
n v Cn `2
N �.. 0) (D
-. x N
N
-. N N 7
00 (M a- O Q O
C1W CD CD
O C, Q N n
CD N. 0 O N
c)
O
COD C07 Q
A
Z3.
CD UD
t(]
(n � (n
N CD O
N
O
NCD
`G
m
m
L
m
M
A
f0 CO
Cn
CD
CD I I
N
CD
� N
p O
D
(D � • I
rN
CD
(D
(D
N
(D _
CO
DRAFT Apr12 -16 District Principles 113
For review only
d' 'O
■
0
6' 6' 8' 11' 10' 11' 8'
Sidewalk Parking Drive Lane Planting Strip Drive Lane Parking
Lane Lane
Parkway Street. This tree lined street has a 72 -foot wide right -of -way
and a center median with trees. The median may have turf or perennials and
shrubs depending on the surrounding context. Parkways at the entrance to a
neighborhood or district are logical places for upgrading the median plantings to
perennials and shrubs with trees. In special cases, the median may be depressed
and function as a stormwater amenity. In this case, upgraded plantings are
advised. The City Engineer may reduce or eliminate on- street parking for this street
type outside the Town Center depending on the surrounding context.
Bikeway Street. The Bikeway also has a 72 -foot wide right -of -way, but the
section is allocated differently. Instead of a center median, as in the Parkway, a
bikeway allocates bike lanes on the outside of the drive lanes. The City Engineer
may reduce or eliminate on- street parking for this street type outside the Town
Center depending on the surrounding context.
■■
,m
6' 6'
Sidewalk
11 ■
6' 6' 8' 5' 11' 11' 5' 8' 6' 6'
Sidewalk Parking Drive Lane Drive Lane Parking Sidewalk
Lane Lane
on
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
141 District Principles DRAFT Apt-12-16
For review only
,m
6' 6'
Sidewalk
11 ■
6' 6' 8' 5' 11' 11' 5' 8' 6' 6'
Sidewalk Parking Drive Lane Drive Lane Parking Sidewalk
Lane Lane
on
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
141 District Principles DRAFT Apt-12-16
For review only
ON �E
Illlllu� ' R
N
r C'/
16' 8 11' 11' 8' 16'
Pedestrian Realm Parking Drive Lane Drive Lane Parking Pedestrian Realm
Lane Lane
Main Street is characterized by a 70 -foot right -of -way width. Buildings should
have a zero setback. The pedestrian realm is an urban streetscape with space
for window shopping, furnishings, pedestrian level lighting, overstory trees and
planters.
on
Main Street Pedestrian Realm. The pedestrian realm on Main Street
is 16 -feet wide from back of curb to building face. Amenities supportive of the
building uses are encouraged including: patio seating, benches, bicycle racks, litter
receptacles, and planter pots with seasonal displays. Infrastructure like pedestrian
level lighting, street trees in landscaped boulevards are also appropriate.
parking 8 -feet 8 -feet zero
lane setback
16 -feet wide
DRAFT Apr12 -16 District Principles 115
For review only
5' 6' 8' 11' 11' 8'
Sidewalk Parking Drive Lane Drive Lane Parking
Lane Lane
Connector Street. The Connector Street has a 60 -foot right -of -way and
prioritizes movement across the community. Setbacks vary by district, but the
frontage is consistently a sidewalk in the throughway and a turf boulevard with
regularly spaced overstory and tall ornamental trees.
Local Street. The Local Street has a 50 -foot right -of -way with parking on one
side and serves the movement needs of neighborhood residents. Setbacks vary
by district, but the frontage is consistently a sidewalk in the throughway and a turf
boulevard with regularly spaced overstory and tall ornamental trees. The drive lane
near the curb is slightly wider to accommodate vehicular buffer space.
t�
6' 5'
Sidewalk
M
n
5' 6' 11' 10' 7' 6' 5'
Sidewalk Drive Lane Drive Lane Parking Sidewalk
Lane
16 1 District Principles DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Street typology in this appendix does not
take the place of the standards found in
the Corcoran Comprehensive Plan and
Subdivision Ordinance, but is intended to
supplement that information with a more
detailed description of the street design in this
district.
The developer shall be responsible for
construction of all streetscape improvements
along adjacent streets. These improvements
include all hardscape, landscape and site
amenities, such as trails, sidewalks, benches,
bike racks, street trees and plantings.
Frontage (space between the back of curb
and the right -of -way line) can be divided into
two zones: the throughway and pedestrian
buffer.
Throughway is foremost the accessible
route for pedestrians. Once the needs for ADA
accessibility are met, the remaining width is
based on the needs of the frontage. An urban
frontage with shopping and many pedestrians
requires a wider throughway to allow for
window shopping, couples walking side -by-
side, strollers and the like.
Pedestrian Buffer is the space between
the throughway and the back of curb. It will
also vary in width depending on the needs of
the adjacent land uses. In active urban areas,
the pedestrian buffer includes patio tables,
pedestrian lighting, street trees, planters and
all the amenities that support the streetscape
character. In single family residential
neighborhoods, the pedestrian buffer is
generally tree lined with turf or plantings
tended by residents.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Frontage Prototype. The frontage is a subset of each street section.
In high traffic areas, like Main Street, the frontage is wide, fully paved and
programmed to support the wide range of retail, service and residential activities
occurring on adjacent properties.
parking pedestrian throughway
lane buffer
street frontage
4-- right -of -way
building type
& setback varies by
zoning district
In low density residential areas, the frontage is narrow and supports the needs of a
quiet neighborhood. A sidewalk and turf boulevard with regularly spaced overstory
and tall ornamental trees is sufficient.
� right -of -way
pedestrian throughway building type
buffer & setback varies by
zoning district
street frontage
District Principles 117
Landscaping and Screening
Site design and landscaping should be designed to work with the existing topography of the
area, preserving the rolling hills, Rush Creek natural resources corridor, woods and wetlands,
and natural viewsheds and corridors.
Landscape screens with berms, hedgerows, and a variety of deciduous and coniferous native
trees and shrubs should be incorporated to minimize undesirable views from the public realm.
Signage and Gateways
Signage should be designed as an integral part of the building and site design and shall comply
with the requirements of Chapter 84 of the City Code.
Include gateway signage at key intersections along County Road 116 and the Town Center.
Incorporate landscaping, lighting and hardscape to anchor the gateway's visual presence.
181 District Principles
Gateways. City Center Drive, Main Street and
Larkin Road, primary and secondary entrances to
the Town Center, should have gateway amenities. I
andscaping, monument signage, and lighting.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
City Center
Drive
L r
II
Main
Street
Larkin
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
s
Stormwater Management
Water features and drainage systems are essential components of development in the
Southeast District. A mix of ponds, fountains and other water elements provide focal
amenities and year round activities within the framework of an environmentally responsible,
visually pleasing strategy to manage stormwater. Each site has a responsibility to utilize best
management practices (BMP) to pretreat run -off, reduce erosion and encourage infiltration in
compliance with City and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission standards. Water
and landscape should be utilized within multipurpose areas that accommodate both active and
passive recreational use — the following examples illustrate only a few of many possibilities:
1. Pervious pavements, underground storage and other creative techniques should be
used to BMP standards, particularly in the Town Center where more density is expected.
2. Green architecture, expressed through green roofs, gray water recycling and other
techniques should be included to reduce the impact of new development on stormwater
systems
3. Water feature design should include both formal elements (such as reflecting pools
or fountains) and natural /informal forms (such as ponds or fountains) and should explore
creative ways to integrate wet landscapes with active, urban spaces.
Stormater Management. Stormwater
management infrastructure can take a variety of
forms. A hard working below ground system can be
topped by a parking lot, streetscape or even a planted
swale. These examples of stormwater infrastructure
are from various locations around the Twin Cities
metro area (top left to bottom right) planted swale
within a parking lot, infiltration system under a parking
lot, structural cell streetscape system, infiltration
trench within a county road median.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
vim....
4MIaw I I
hill,
District Principles 119
arnr,anw,n�rr nRw 1
_ 1
I�
E� rr rri■ ■r '
� 1
1 f • s i i i i � r i r i 1
l I
i 1
Rad tlW�Gtl9 _ � 1 � 1
1 � 1
1
Existing Parks
Proposed Parks
Southeast District Parks
Within the Town Center, the linear park along
County Road 116, the Town Square, and two small
neighborhood playgrounds serve residents and
visitors.
201 District Principles DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Parks, Trails and Public Space
The linear park (A) should continue north and south through the town
center on the East side of County Road 116, with trail connections
to new civic and community spaces and uses. Safe, convenient
pedestrian crossings are a priority within the entire Southeast District.
New public spaces, parks, and common greens or open space
should be linked to other community parks and open space with trail
connections to the existing and proposed City parks and trail system.
The only active park currently in the Southeast District is Corcoran
Community Park (E). This park currently shares space with the
Rockford School facilities on the adjacent parcel. The park will likely
change over time as the school property is developed and road
connections in this area are modified, but this will continue to be
an important park in the City system and priority should be given to
ensuring strong bike and pedestrian connections to this park and other
planned parks in the district. A second City park is being developed on
the City Hall property and could be expanded to take advantage of the
woodland area on the east side of the City Hall property.
A new Town Square (B) is planned in the Downtown Core. The Town
Square will serve as a social center for the community, suitable for
concerts and celebrations, but also as a place to enjoy the scenes of
downtown. Picnic tables for lunch, benches for people watching, the
Town Square will be a public space to support a bustling downtown.
Two small neighborhood parks (C & D) are also planned in the Town
Center, one each to the north and south of the Downtown Core. These
parks will include walking trails and playgrounds. The neighborhood
park on the north is nestled in an existing woodland, and will provide
interesting walking trails, connecting to City Hall, ample shade, and an
opportunity for an exercise circuit (Par Course) for the adjacent senior
housing development. The southern neighborhood park is perched
on a terrace above the wetland and offers great views across the
landscape. A playground and trails through the wetland prairie will offer
birdwatching and contemplation.
All three parks will be developed when the adjacent property is platted.
Other parks are proposed in the Southeast District in the Ravinia
neighborhood and near Blue Bonnet Drive.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Par Course Station
Woodland Playground
Wetland Overlook
District Principles 121
Public green space, within close proximity to homes
and businesses, is a vital part of a healthy community.
A Town Square is meant to serve as a community
gathering place for celebrations throughout the
seasons. This example from Burnsville is a modern
destination surrounded by civic, retail and residential
uses.
Temporary winter uses like a small ice rink could
double the value of a bandshell or picnic pavilion
when considered as a warming house in the cold
season. Olympic Plaza in Whistler below creates an
irregular shaped rink for casual and family use.
22 1 District Principles DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
This page left intentionally blank
DRAFT Apr12 -16 District Principles 123
For review only
Meieter Road f Ful mCR 10 + +
r
i 4
r t
t ,
�f�k 10 minul�,wall�r ► � 1
1 1
i ♦ +
►i I 11¢ * < RCN,
1
1 � ► r I +
L . CR5D._ r 1 r
% 4 I
S 1 li ►
% 1
< < f t y
• � r I
�i ► , r +
r
\ %, r !
i hl '1
-- Larkin Road I Future OR 50 ♦► ♦ _ _ ►
s*! �1� 1t ►
t r
jr � ♦ , i
1 4
•cl + / �p
�y a
► r 1 •<
i 1 '' -Y ♦ t
+ 1 i ' //V
t <
t +
t
a # t
Y f t
Existing Parks
y i i
Proposed Parks A► `<
\
Walkable Destinations Map. A five orten ` %%
minute walk, 1/4 or 1/2 mile radius, is one common
way to consider walkability. Within the Southeast
District, there are intended to be a high number of
parks, retail uses and residential units within that
walkable range.
Not To Scale
241 Healthy Communities DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
i �! -
�= Health y Communities
While developing these guidelines, the City of Corcoran was mindful of how community design
impacts the health of the people who live, work, play, learn and worship in the city. Communities
around the country are increasingly aware of the impact that land -use and transportation
have on people's ability to be active and access healthy food. We also know that a lack of
physical activity, combined with diet, is one of the leading factors behind the increase in chronic
diseases, such as heart disease and type II diabetes.
Sidewalks, trails, bike lanes and parks all provide opportunities for people to be physically
active, both recreationally and by incorporating activity into their daily routines. Mixed -use and
higher density developments also encourage people to be active by making it easier to bike
and walk to destinations rather than driving. When developing the plan and design guidelines
for the Southeast District (including the Town Center and the Downtown Core), we looked at the
following considerations:
• An integrated transportation network: Streets connecting residential areas to
the Downtown Core are safe, appealing and accessible to people walking and biking, as
well as people driving motor vehicles. A combination of off -road and on- street bike and
pedestrian facilities are included to give people safe and convenient options for active
transportation.
• Accessible destinations and inviting design: Housing, retail and other
destinations are located in or near the downtown to invite walking by creating pleasant and
safe routes.
• Green space: A new Town Square and neighborhood park create additional
opportunities for physical activity and promotes social connectedness.
DRAFT Apr12 -16 Healthy Communities 125
For review only
Legend
Mixed Use with
Commercial at Street Level
Mixed Use with
Office at Street Level
■Apartments &
Town Homes
Single Family
Town Center
M M Downtown Core
OGateway Nodes
Not To Scale
261 Town Center DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Town Center Development Potential: The concept
developed for the new Town Center includes the
following development potential:
Concept Areas
Town Center
291 acres
Downtown Core
Commercial
28 acres
220,300 sq. ft.
Office
212,400 sq. ft.
Single Family Residential
110 units
Townhomes
190 units
Apartment/Condo
500 units
Senior Living
250 units
Town Square Park
4.2 acres
South Neighborhood Park
3 acres
North Neighborhood Park
3.5 acres
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Town Center
Overview
The Town Center is the walkable traditional neighborhood supporting the Downtown Core. The
Town Center is bound by City Hall on the north, Shamrock Golf Course on the south, County
Road 116 on the west and Maple Hill Road on the east. The Town Center is intended to support
the Downtown Core through walkable blocks, a variety of housing types and densities, and a
unified public realm aesthetic. The Downtown Core is a subset of the Town Center and shall
have additional design guidelines.
All development within the Southeast District will be based on an integrated transportation
network that connects residential neighborhoods with the existing business park on the west
side of County Road 116 and the Downtown Core on the east side of County Road 116. A
combination of off -road and on- street bike and pedestrian facilities are included to give
residents and visitors safe and convenient options for active transportation as an option to
driving.
Special emphasis will be placed on providing accessible destinations and inviting design.
Housing, retail and other destinations are located in or near the Downtown Core to invite
walking by creating pleasant and safe routes within the Town Center. A Town Square, City Hall
Park and two small Neighborhood Parks create additional opportunities for physical activity and
social connectedness.
Uses within the Town Center include: mixed use, public /semi- public, and mixed residential. The
Town Center shall be developed in compliance with the standards in the Zoning Ordinance and
these guidelines.
Town Center 127
Reinforcement of the street edge with low walls and landscaping.
Buildings - Placement, Massing and Height
The area and setback requirements shall be as noted in the Zoning
Ordinance for the district in which the property is located, except that
additional standards shall be required for the Downtown Core as
noted elsewhere in this document. Placement of non - residential and
multi - family residential structures should support a higher level of
consideration as described in this section.
Street Edge Requirement. A consistent street edge must be
maintained at the right -of -way line along all street frontages. Street
edge elements may consist of the primary building, low masonry walls,
fences, landscaping or a combination of all of these elements.
Zero Lot Line Buildings are encouraged within the Town Center
and particularly in the Downtown Core.
Building Frontage. At least 60% of the primary street linear
frontage of each lot shall be occupied by a building at the required
build -to line. Other portions of a building beyond the 60% may be set
back farther than required by the build -to line. In addition, on corner
lots, a minimum of the first 50 feet of the lot frontage on either side of
a street intersection must be occupied by buildings set at the build to
line. Parking or other space open to the sky is not allowed within this
first 50 feet.
The build -to line may be met either with an enclosed building or an
arcade constructed with a permanent roof of the same materials as the
remainder of the building.
281 Town Center
_ f -
Diagram of building frontage requirements for primary street and corner lot
frontage.
Height. Multi -story buildings (greater than two stories) built to the
maximum heights permitted by zoning are encouraged.
Stepping portions of upper stories back from the line of the front fagade
to provide areas for outdoor terraces and rooftop patios is encouraged.
New single story commercial building types with flat roofs shall have a
minimum cornice height of 20 feet to better define the street.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Architectural screening and plantings minimize the visual impact of necessary but
unappealing portions of this apartment building.
Screening and Loading
Ground Mounted Mechanical Equipment shall be fully
screened and properly maintained with material similar to or
compatible with material used on the main structure. Screened
mechanical equipment shall not be located in the front side yard, but
may be located at the side or rear yard.
Trash and Recycling Storage areas shall be designed internal
to the principal building and shall not be allowed in an external fenced
structure. Trash and recycling storage area doors shall not be located
on the primary front elevation of building, but may be located in the
side or rear yard.
Loading Areas and Docks shall be limited to the rear of the
principal building and shall not be visible from the street. These areas
shall be screened from adjacent residential areas by fencing, walls, or
landscaping. Screening shall block views from public right -of -way or
adjacent uses and shall be equally effective in winter and summer.
DRAFT Apr12 -16 Town Center 129
For review only
Facades
Facades for non - residential and multi - family
residential structures should support a higher
level of design as described in this section.
Architectural Style shall not be restricted.
However, Architectural Styles as described
in Section Two are encouraged. Evaluation
of a project shall be based on the quality
of its design and on its relationship to its
surroundings, guided by the provisions in
these guidelines and the Zoning Ordinance.
The architectural appearance, including
building character, permanence, massing,
composition, and scale of all principal
buildings shall comply with the Master Plan.
Franchise architecture (building design
that is trademarked or identified with a
particular chain or corporation and is generic
in nature) is prohibited unless it employs
a traditional storefront commercial style.
Franchises or national chains shall follow
these guidelines to create context - sensitive
buildings that are sustainable in that they can
be reused by other types of business.
301 Town Center
A - Entrances. The main entrance shall
face the primary street with secondary
entrances to the side or rear. In the case of
a corner building or a building abutting more
than one street, the City will determine which
street should be considered primary.
B - Appearance. All sides of buildings
shall have an equal appearance in terms of
materials and general design.
C - Windows. At least 40% of the wall
surface at the street side of the first story,
non - residential, shall consist of clear windows
and doors that allow a view into the working
areas, lobbies or display areas.
D - Roofs. Building facades that exceed
100 feet in length measured along the street
frontage shall have variations in roofline or
rooftop parapet. Rooftop equipment shall be
concealed behind parapets or screened from
the view of pedestrians.
E - Elements. All buildings shall include the
following elements:
• Accent materials shall be wrapped
around all walls;
• Complementary major material colors.
F - Articulation. Any exterior building wall
adjacent to or visible from a public street,
public open space, or abutting property
may not exceed 40 feet in length without
visual relief consisting of one or more of the
following:
• The facade shall be divided
architecturally by means of significantly
different materials or textures, or
• Horizontal offsets of at least four feet in
depth, or
• Vertical offsets in the roofline of at least
four feet, or
• Fenestration at the first floor level which
is recessed horizontally at least one foot
into the facade.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
A
n
J
G - Materials. Exterior building materials shall be classified either primary, secondary,
or accent materials. Primary materials shall cover at least 60 % of the facade of a building.
Secondary materials may cover no more than 30% of the facade. Accent materials may include
door and window frames, lintels, cornices, and other minor elements, and may cover no more
than 10% of the facade. Allowable materials are as follows:
• Primary exterior building materials may be brick, stone (natural or cultured) EIFS, stucco,
architectural precast concrete or glass. Bronze tinted or mirror glass are prohibited as
exterior materials.
• Secondary exterior building materials may be any of the primary building materials above
or decorative block, integrally colored stucco, or fiber cement siding (color impregnated or
painted) in vertical panel design only with hidden seams.
• Accent materials may be wood, metal or fiber cement when used in trim, fascia or soffit if
appropriately integrated into the overall building design and not situated in areas which will
be subject to physical or environmental damage.
• All primary and secondary materials shall be integrally colored, except where otherwise
stated.
• Decorative block shall be colored only by means of a pigment integral to the block material,
not applied to the surface.
• Sheet metal, corrugated metal, iron, shakes, plain flat concrete block are not acceptable as
exterior wall materials.
1
I- f
4 �
Cie • - -
it aid
1
or
F
gal
11
DRAFT Apr12 -16 Town Center 131
For review only
Streets
Walkability is a priority in the Town Center. All streets and crossings should be safe and
accessible for pedestrians with enhancements to support low speed vehicular travel, on street
parking, and adequate right -of -way for healthy tree canopy. Design components should include
paving or striping of crosswalks, curb extensions, pedestrian level and roadway level lighting,
tree lined boulevards.
Bike lanes are strategically incorporated on major east /west connectors via the, Bikeway
Street type, to provide thoughtful bicycle routes between the County Road 116 linear park into
the Town Center district neighborhoods and beyond.
Sidewalks are required along all streets within the Town Center. The location and alignment
of new sidewalks shall connect directly with adjacent existing networks. The width of the
sidewalk shall be consistent with City policy and the design guidelines.
Where the sidewalk along the public street is interrupted by a curb cut, the walkway across the
driveway shall be delineated by elevated pavement or by use of contrasting pavement materials
that meet ADA accessibility standards.
Parking. On- street parking shall be incorporated with the street design within the Town Center.
Parking zones shall be defined either by curbing or with a change in paving materials.
Curb Cuts. The number and width of curb cuts shall be limited in conformance with City
policy. Sites with multiple buildings shall have unified /joint access.
Utility Installation. New utilities shall be placed underground. Compatible lines (e.g.,
electric, phone, cable) shall be placed in a common trench.
321 Town Center DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Southeast District Street Types
Type
County Road
ROW
120 feet
Parkway Street
72 feet
Bikeway Street
72 feet
Main Street (Downtown Core)
70 feet
Connector Street
60 feet
Local Street
50 feet
DRAFTApr12 -16
For review only
LUL .
Li
r
Town Center 133
Parking and Access
No parking spaces shall be located on corner
lots at the point of street intersections.
Reductions. Per Section 1060.060 of the
Zoning Ordinance parking may be reduced
by:
• Up to 20% of required off - street parking
spaces in the case of shared parking
between abutting uses or use of public
parking.
• One parking space for each on- street
parking space provided at the lot frontage
on a public street adjacent to the lot.
Pedestrian Circulation. Clearly defined,
safe pedestrian access shall be provided from
parking areas, adjacent public rights -of -way,
and public and private open space to building
entrances. Pedestrian walkways traversing
parking lots with more than 60 parking spaces
shall meet the following guidelines:
• Walkways adjacent to parking spaces
shall be at least five feet wide and shall
be separated from vehicles by curbing or
landscaping.
• Walkways that cross parking lot drive
aisles shall be delineated by stripes,
contrasting pavement materials, elevated
pavement, or a combination of these
measures.
Bicycle Parking. Non - residential
developments shall strive to provide bicycle
parking spaces in a convenient, visible,
preferably sheltered location.
341 Town Center DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
a
Landscaping and Screening
tl
tl
Parking bays shall have landscape islands at each end, and bays in excess of 15 spaces in
length shall be divided by intermediate islands. Landscape islands shall provide at least 360
square feet of area for planting trees, shrubs and/or groundcovers. Intermediate landscape
islands shall provide at least 180 square feet of planting area.
A landscape buffer of a minimum five feet in width shall be provided between all parking areas
and the public sidewalk. The buffer shall consist of shade trees, low shrubs or perennial flowers
and a decorative fence or masonry wall. Plantings and parking lot screen walls or fences shall
be no less than three feet and no more than four feet in height to allow views into and out of
parking areas
All land area not occupied by buildings, parking, driveways, sidewalks or other hard surfaces
shall be sodded or mulched and landscaped with approved ground cover, flowers, shrubbery
and trees.
Landscaping shall include a full complement of overstory, ornamental and evergreen trees,
shrubbery and ground covers which are hardy and appropriate for the locations in which they
are planted and provide year -long color and interest.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Suggested Trees for the Town Center
Valley Forge Elm, Ulmus americana 'Valley Forge'
Bitternut Hickory, Carya cordiformis
Sienna Glen Maple, Acer x freemanii 'Sienna'
Boulevard Linden, Tilia americana `Boulevard'
Ohio Buckeye, Aesculus glabra
Ginkgo (male), Gingko biloba
Bicolor Oak, Quercus bicolor
Northern Red Oak, Quercus rubra
Princeton Elm, Ulmus americana `Princeton'
Accolade Elm, Ulmus x Accolade'
River Birch (single stem), Betula nigra
Korean Mountain Ash, Sorbus alnifolia
Crabapple species (persistent fruit)
Japanese Tree Lilac, Syringa reticulate
Town Center 135
Downtown Core Map: The Downtown Core is focused along Main
Street and around a Town Square. Commercial mixed -use (which
may include first floor commercial with residential above) is intended
for a majority of the Downtown Core with medium and high- density
residential uses supporting at the periphery.
r—.: -
79th Avenue
= n i
361 Downtown Core
■
■
�d
SAN APARN
I M i
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
bd��I /na��ir
Downtown •
Downtown Core Objectives:
1. Downtown Core maintains the unique
heritage and history of Corcoran.
2. Downtown Core is where the
community gathers.
3. Downtown Core provides safe,
convenient access for pedestrians,
bicycles and vehicles.
4. Downtown Core provides the daily
retail and service needs for the
community.
5. Downtown Core is a mix of
businesses, public spaces and
residential neighborhoods that are
connected by complementary design
elements and streetscapes.
6. Downtown Core is a destination for
the region.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Overview
The Downtown Core is the commercial and
civic heart of Corcoran. It is bound by 78th
Avenue on the north, 76th Avenue on the
south, County Road 116 on the west and Oak
Lane on the east. This district is the six block
Main Street area as shown on the Downtown
Core master plan. It is intended to offer
residents and visitors a central community
place to serve their daily commercial and
personal service needs, and to gather with
their neighbors for civic celebrations and
social events.
Through these guidelines, the Downtown
Core will focus public and private investments
in a smaller geographic area to support a
critical mass of high quality development and
public realm amenities.
Design requirements in this section are in
addition to criteria set in the Downtown Mixed
Use Zoning District and in these Guidelines.
Where conflicts arise, this section shall
prevail.
Vision
Downtown Corcoran is a walkable, identifiable
place that reflects the unique character of
the community. A mix of restaurants, shops,
and services will make it possible to meet
daily needs all within a walkable area of the
city. This pedestrian scale, with a cohesive
building and landscape appearance, will
identify this area as uniquely Corcoran.
Site Development
Destination retail, restaurant and
entertainment uses, particularly mixed with
other synergistic uses, are encouraged.
Development should be appropriate for a
traditional downtown area, with mixed -use
buildings combining retail, commercial, and
multi - family residential uses.
Buildings - Placement, Massing
and Height
The area and setback requirements shall
be as noted in the Zoning Ordinance for the
district in which the property is located, except
that additional standards shall be required for
the Downtown Core as noted elsewhere in
this document.
Height. Buildings are required to be a
minimum of two stories in the Downtown
Core. Stepping portions of upper stories back
from the line of the front fagade to provide
areas for outdoor terraces and rooftop patios
is encouraged.
Downtown Core 137
l
7 Streetscape
Suggested Trees for the Downtown
Core
Princeton Elm, Ulmus americana `Princeton'
Accolade Elm, Ulmus x Accolade'
Skyline Honeylocust, Gleditsia triacanthos var.
inermis `Skyline'
Valley Forge Elm, Ulmus americana 'Valley Forge'
Boulevard Linden, Tilia americana `Boulevard'
Ohio Buckeye, Aesculus glabra
Ginkgo (male), Ginkgo biloba
Kentucky Coffeetree (male), Gymnocladus dioicus
Japanese Tree Lilac, Syringa reticulate
Thornless Cockspur Hawthorne, Crataegus crus -galli
var. inermis
381 Downtown Core
Trees and plantings
Overstory trees should be placed with regularity along street frontages in order to create dapple
shade within 10 -15 years. Space and placement of trees, lighting and signage should be
thoughtfully considered to create a unified whole supportive of Downtown Core goals.
Furnishings
Main Street is designed as a traditional downtown main street, lined with street trees and
planters, pedestrian level lighting, and furnishings including benches and trash receptacles.
These elements shall also occur within the Town Center, to a lesser extent.
Outdoor Dining
Pavement widths are wider in the Downtown Core than in other areas of the in order to
support the widest variety of streetscape amenities. Outdoor dining shall be permitted through
the Downtown Core and shall be placed in the pedestrian buffer area of the sidewalk section.
Awnings
Where awnings are used, canvas, fabric or vinyl awnings are preferable. If glass or metal
awnings are employed, they shall closely complement the building's architectural character
and aesthetic. The bottom of a window awning shall be set at least seven feet above the public
sidewalk. Back lighted vinyl awnings and canopy signs shall not be used.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
parking pedestrian throughway building type
lane buffer & setback varies by
zoning district
street frontage
Sidewalks and Boulevards
County Road 116 and Main Street in the
Downtown Core warrants a unique design
treatment. This intersection will be developed
as the entry into the Downtown Core with
appropriate identity elements. The County
Road 116 linear park will offer trails through a
landscaped open space, which extends into
the Downtown Core and greater Town Center.
The City will continue to work with Hennepin
County to ensure that the ultimate design
of County Road 116 respects the City's
intention to develop a district that is safe and
accessible for all modes of transportation,
including walking and biking.
Parking
1. No parking spaces shall be located
on corner lots at the point of street
intersections.
2. No parking spaces shall be located
between the immediate front of the
principal structure and the abutting front
lot line.
DRAFT Apr12 -16 Downtown Core 139
For review only
401 Downtown Core
Public Art
Public art is encouraged in the Downtown
Core. Durable, safe, artful enhancements
to furnishings, paving, signage and building
facades are also encouraged.
All locations and works of art, regardless of
ownership, placed within the public rights of-
way or public areas shall be approved by the
City Council prior to installation.
DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
Signage
Signage shall comply with Chapter 84 of the
City Code. However, in the Downtown Core
the City is open to considering more creative
signage to reflect the energetic commercial/
entertainment uses that may be developed
in the subdistrict. Decorative neon, moving
or other decorative sign types are desirable
when displayed within interior storefront
windows.
DRAFT Apr12 -16 Downtown Core 141
For review only
Plazas
All properties with principal buildings in
excess of 30,000 square feet shall be
required to have a public plaza space.
The public plaza space shall include benches,
bike racks trash receptacles, lighting fixtures
and other amenities to create a welcoming
space for tenants of the building and
members of the public.
These plaza spaces should be visible from
the public street.
42 1 Downtown Core DRAFT Apr12 -16
For review only
A
Implementation
Introduction
The design guidelines provide distinct strategies for guiding form and appearance. This
vision will take several years to implement. Successful implementation will require consistent
application of the Design Guidelines by City staff and City Council. Zoning enforcement and
design guidelines will not succeed without the cooperation and commitment of landowners,
development interests, and the rest of the community.
Changes to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
The Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines suggest changes to the City's
Land Use Plan to reflect the goals of the guidelines. The proposed changes to the Land Use
Plan and Zoning Map will be undertaken as a separate action following adoption of these
guidelines.
Design Review
The design guidelines will be administered by staff as part of the development review process.
Staff will incorporate design review to ensure compliance with the design guidelines as a
standard step in the development review process
DRAFT Apr12 -16 Implementation 143
For review only
City of Corcoran
2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -xx
Motion By:
Seconded By:
month day,
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
TEXT OF APPENDIX B (SOUTHEAST DISTRICT PLAN AND DESIGN GUIDELINES) OF
CHAPTER 10 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN ZONING
ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran initiated an amendment to update the Southeast District and
Downtown Design Guidelines in Appendix A of the Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines are formatted
differently than the adopted guidelines for the Southwest and Northeast districts; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to update the ordinance in increments; and
WHEREAS, the City will adopt new standards for the Southeast District as Appendix B of the
Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with and help to implement the 2030
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly
called Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Zoning Ordinance text
amendment based on the finding that the proposed amendments would be consistent with State
law and the City's Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code.
Page 1 of 2
City of Corcoran
2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
VOTING AYE
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -xx
VOTING NAY
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
month day,
Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this XXth day of May 2016.
Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor
ATTEST:
City Seal
Jessica Beise — City Clerk /Administrative Services Coordinator
Page 2 of 2
•
•
Agenda Item 7 b.
L A N D F 0 R M
From Site to Firisii
105 South Fifth Avenue
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
TO: Corcoran Planning Commission
FROM: Kathleen Hammer through Kendra Lindahl, Landform
DATE: April 26, 2016 for the May 5, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting
•
•
Tel: 612 - 252 -9070
Fax: 612 - 252 -9077
www.landform.net
RE: PUBLIC HEARING. City- Initiated Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the Private Drive
Ordinance (city file no. 16 -003)
60 -DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: N/A
Application Request
The City Council directed staff to draft an ordinance amendment to the private drive ordinance.
Specifically, the Council directed staff to remove the section of the Subdivision Ordinance that
requires private drives be paved if accessed off of a paved public street.
2. Background
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the preliminary plat and ordinance amendment
on September 3, 2015 to consider allowing private drives in the Rural Residential zoning district.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the ordinance as drafted,
which allowed landowners the option of either a paved or gravel private drive. Staff noted that the
current subdivision ordinance allows new public streets in the RR district to be constructed as a
gravel street, but that paved streets are encouraged by increasing the number of development rights
when the street is paved. A landowner must pave a new public street (or new private drive) in order
to increase their development rights, which currently allows 1 development right for every 30 acres
on a gravel road or 1 development right for every 10 acres on a paved road.
At the October 8, 2015 Council meeting, the Council considered the Planning Commission
recommendation, but modified the approval to require that private drives accessing onto a paved
road be paved.
Following that action, the Council heard from residents who felt this change was onerous and
requested that the condition be removed.
At their November 23, 2015 meeting, the Council directed staff to bring back an ordinance
amendment to eliminate the paving requirement except that a 100 -foot apron be required.
Landform ®, SensiblyGreeO and Site to Finish" are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
•
3. Proposed Language
•
•
The current Subdivision Ordinance requires private drives be paved if accessed off a paved public
street. Based on Council feedback at the November 23, 2015 meeting, we recommend removing
this requirement and modifying it to simply require private drives to have a 100 -foot apron if
accessed off a paved public street. This will help ensure that gravel is not brought onto the paved
public streets. Staff recommends the following changes to Section 9.45.020, Subd. 20 (A)(2)(f) of the
Subdivision Ordinance as shown below by deleting the material and adding the underlined material
as follows:
Subd. 20. Alleys and Private Drives. Alleys and private drives may be permitted by the City
Council, and are subject to the following standards:
A. Private Drives in the Rural Residential District. In conjunction with the review of
plats in the Rural Residential District Zoning District, the City Council may
approve private drives provided that all of the following conditions are met:
a. The council finds that a public street connection is not required for the public
street network.
2. Design Standards.
a. A private drive shall not exceed 2,640 feet in length unless it forms a
continuous connection or loops back to a public street. Any such private
drive with a terminus 1,320 feet or more from the nearest intersection will
be required to provide a cul -de -sac at the closed end according to City
Engineering Standards.
b. The subdivider shall provide access to lots via public streets. Private
drives are subject to the access standards of 945.020, Subd. 12, D and
945.020 Subd. 12, F.
c. Roadway standards must comply with Section 945.010, Subd. 5
(Engineering Design Standards). Private drives shall conform to the City of
Corcoran Standard Detail Plates for shared driveways, as may be
amended. The City Engineer may require additional site information and
may require additional design standards that enhance safety.
d. Individual unit driveways that gain access from any such private drive shall
be a minimum of 22 feet in length.
e. A decorative sign stating "Private Drive" shall be located near each
entrance to a private drive. Such sign shall also provide the range of
addresses served by the private drive.
f. The private drive must include a paved apron of 100 feet be paved if it
accesses off of-a paved public street.
Private Drive Ordinance Amendment (city file 16 -003)
May 5, 2016
i
•
•
3. Lot Standards.
a. Areas devoted to private roads shall not be included in parcel size
calculations.
b. The private drive may not be placed in an outlot, and must be included
with the parcel.
c. Lot width shall be measured at the lot line. For purpose of complying with
the minimum lot width requirements, the front of the lot shall be the lot line
adjacent to the private drive.
d. Access for each lot in the subdivision shall be from the private drive. No
direct access to public streets shall be allowed for lots within the
subdivision.
4. Easement and Maintenance Agreement. An access easement and
maintenance agreement shall be established for all private drives, subject to
review and approval of the City Attorney and shall be recorded at Hennepin
County prior to issuing building permits.
5. Homeowners Association Agreement. A homeowners association agreement
shall be established to ensure that any such private drive remains "private" in
perpetuity, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney, and shall be
filed with the plat at Hennepin County. Such instrument shall require
mandatory participation of all homeowners that have access via the private
drive, shall include the requirement for creation of a fund to address
maintenance, drainage and snow removal on the private drive, subject to City
review and approval.
4. Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the following:
1. Ordinance Amendment eliminating the requirement for a paved private drive
2. Resolution approving findings of fact for Ordinance amendment
Attachments
1. Draft Ordinance Amendment
2. Draft Resolution approving Findings of Fact
Private Drive Ordinance Amendment (city file 16 -003)
May 5, 2016
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
Motion By:
Seconded By:
Month day, 2016
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF SECTION 945.020 OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE
CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE
CORCORAN CITY CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORCORAN ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Amendments. The text of Section 945.020, Subd. 20(A)(2)(f) of Chapter 9
(Subdivision Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the S+"
material and adding the underlined material as follows:
Subd. 20. Alleys and Private Drives. Alleys and private drives may be permitted by the
City Council, and are subject to the following standards:
A. Private Drives in the Rural Residential District. In conjunction with the review
of plats in the Rural Residential District Zoning District, the City Council may
approve private drives provided that all of the following conditions are met:
1. The council finds that a public street connection is not required for the
public street network.
2. Design Standards.
a. A private drive shall not exceed 2,640 feet in length unless it forms a
continuous connection or loops back to a public street. Any such
private drive with a terminus 1,320 feet or more from the nearest
intersection will be required to provide a cul -de -sac at the closed end
according to City Engineering Standards.
b. The subdivider shall provide access to lots via public streets. Private
drives are subject to the access standards of 945.020, Subd.12, D
and 945.020 Subd. 12, F.
c. Roadway standards must comply with Section 945.010, Subd. 5
(Engineering Design Standards). Private drives shall conform to the
City of Corcoran Standard Detail Plates for shared driveways, as may
be amended. The City Engineer may require additional site
information and may require additional design standards that enhance
safety.
d. Individual unit driveways that gain access from any such private drive
shall be a minimum of 22 feet in length.
Page 1 of 3
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
Month day, 2016
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
e. A decorative sign stating "Private Drive" shall be located near each
entrance to a private drive. Such sign shall also provide the range of
addresses served by the private drive.
f. The private drive must include a paved apron of 100 feet be paved if it
accesses off ef-a paved public street.
3. Lot Standards.
a. Areas devoted to private roads shall not be included in parcel size
calculations.
b. The private drive may not be placed in an outlot, and must be
included with the parcel.
c. Lot width shall be measured at the lot line. For purpose of complying
with the minimum lot width requirements, the front of the lot shall be
the lot line adjacent to the private drive.
d. Access for each lot in the subdivision shall be from the private drive.
No direct access to public streets shall be allowed for lots within the
subdivision.
4. Easement and Maintenance Agreement. An access easement and
maintenance agreement shall be established for all private drives, subject
to review and approval of the City Attorney and shall be recorded at
Hennepin County prior to issuing building permits.
5. Homeowners Association Agreement. A homeowners association
agreement shall be established to ensure that any such private drive
remains "private" in perpetuity, subject to review and approval of the City
Attorney, and shall be filed with the plat at Hennepin County. Such
instrument shall require mandatory participation of all homeowners that
have access via the private drive, shall include the requirement for
creation of a fund to address maintenance, drainage and snow removal
on the private drive, subject to City review and approval.
Page 2 of 3
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 -XX
Month day, 2016
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage.
VOTING AYE
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
VOTING NAY
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this XX day of May 2015.
Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor
ATTEST:
City Seal
Jessica Beise — City Clerk /Administrative Services Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
City of Corcoran
2016
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -xx
Motion By:
Seconded By:
month day,
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
TEXT OF SECTION 945.020, SUBD. 20(A)(2)(F) OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE CORCORAN CITY
CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran initiated an amendment to update the City Code to update the
standards to allow private drives and to remove the requirement that private drives be paved;
and
WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards for public
streets in the rural area and other City policies; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly
called Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Subdivision Ordinance
text amendment based on the finding that the proposed amendments would be consistent with
State law and the City's Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City
Code.
VOTING AYE
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
VOTING NAY
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Hank, Pat
❑ Keefe, Mike
❑ LaFave,Tonya
❑ Thomas, Ron
Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this XXth day of May 2016.
Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor
ATTEST:
City Seal
Jessica Beise — City Clerk /Administrative Services Coordinator
Page 1 of 1
MEMORANDUM
L A N C
From Site to Finish
105 South Fifth Street,
Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
DATE April 20, 2016
... ............................... _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TO Brad Martens
... ............................... _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
cc City Council, Planninq Commission, Parks & Trails Commission
Agenda Item 8 a.
F O R M
0
Tel: 612- 252 -9070
Fax: 612 - 252 -9077
www.landform.net
FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner
... ............................... _.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ...............................
RE Active Corcoran... Planning Applications .................................................................................................................................................. ...............................
... ............................... _.
The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects:
1. Design Guidelines Update for Southeast District /Downtown (city file 15 -021). The City received
funding from Hennepin County for this project. The Project Management Team (PMT) includes the
city administrator, city planner and Hennepin County staff. The final community open house was held
on March 14th. The Parks and Trails Commission recommended approval at their April 19th meeting
and the item is scheduled for a public hearing at the Planning Commission on May 5th and City Council
adoption on May 26th.
2. Park Place Storage request for Rezoning, Variance, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and
Preliminary Plat (City file 16 -002). The City Council reviewed a sketch plan last year for expansion
of the existing mini - storage facility. The applicant has submitted the application, but is working to
provide additional information for completeness. The project is on hold while they work through
wetland issues.
3. Private Drive Ordinance Amendment (City file 16 -003). The City Council approved an ordinance
amendment allowing private drives in the Rural Residential district, subject to certain conditions.
However, after adoption the City Council directed staff to revisit this issue and consider an ordinance
amendment to eliminate the requirement that private drives off paved roads must be paved. Staff has
tentatively scheduled this item for a public hearing at the Planning Commission on May 5th and City
Council adoption on May 26th.
4. Ravinia 411 Addition Final Plat, PUD Final Plan and Vacation (City file 16 -004). Lennar has
submitted an application for 44 single family homes. This area was originally planned for detached
townhomes on 60 -foot wide lots. The applicant is proposing to modify the plan to provide the new
Discovery series single family homes on 55 -foot lots. The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the final PUD plan at their April 7th meeting and City Council is expected to take action on
April 28tH
5. City- Initiated Park Dedication Ordinance Update (City File 14 -007 and 16 -006). Staff was directed
to bring back other potential amendments for consideration in 2015, including revisions to clarify
whether or not existing homes are subject to park dedication when part of a plat, how to ensure that
land dedication in the rural areas is fairly required and a review of our park dedication requirements.
The Council authorized this as a priority for 2016. Staff has prepared a draft ordinance for City
Council consideration at their April 28th meeting. The item would then be scheduled for Parks and
Trails Commission review in May, a Public Hearing at the Planning Commission and City Council
adoption in June.
Landform", Sensibly(3 e 0 and Site to Finish"' are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.
1
6. Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow Solar Gardens (city file 16 -008). Staff received a written
request and escrow from Potentia Solar, Inc. to consider an amendment to allow solar gardens in the
City of Corcoran. They have specifically requested that they be allowed in the UR zoning district, but
staff prepared a number of issues for City Council for direction. We expect an initial draft to be
presented at the March 24th Council meeting. The item could then be scheduled for Parks and Trails
Commission review on April 19th, Public Hearing at the Planning Commission on May 5th and City
Council adoption on May 26th.
7. Randahl Construction Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Amendment at 7241 CR 116 (City
file 16 -012). Randahl Construction has submitted an application for approval of a CUP and site plan
amendment for outside storage at the old Heidi's property. The application was received on April 19th
staff is reviewing the application for completeness, but expect this item to be scheduled for Planning
Commission and City Council in June.
Also, there are a number of projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out:
1. Corcoran Business Park (City file 06 -005). The City Council granted a one year extension to the
final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and is still
working to close out this project. Staff has spoken to the applicant and will schedule a meeting when
more information is available on the Loretto sewer project.
Hope Ministries Conditional Use Permit for Cemetery and Vacation of Drainage & Utility
Easement at 19951 Oswald Farm Road (City file 12 -002). Hope Ministries submitted a request for a
conditional use permit to allow a cemetery west of the existing church. The application was approved
by the City Council on March 22nd and site work had begun. The letter of credit for site improvements
has been released but we are holding the escrow pending completion of the approved landscaping.
The applicant has indicated that they are considering a site plan amendment application to modify the
approved plans. Staff met again with Pastor Brian Lother in December to try to finalize this issue and
address some other questions or concerns from him. We hope to be able to wrap this up in the near
future.
3. Lano Equipment at 23580 Highway 55 Site Plan Modifications for Cold Storage Building. (31-
119 -23 -34 -0007) (13 -006). This item was approved by the City Council on July 11th. All required
improvements have been made. Staff has reduced the letter of credit and is keeping a very small
letter of credit in place to ensure the landscaping survives one year as required by the City Code.
4. Ess Brothers Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for an accessory
building at 9350 County Road (PID # 07- 119 -23 -43 -0004) (City File No. 13 -031) The applicant
requested approval of a 5,500 square feet detached, accessory building with 20 -foot sidewalls. The
City Council approved this item on January 23,d. The applicant must comply with all conditions of
approval (which require landscaping improvements) and then staff will inspect before refunding any
remaining escrow. The landowner recently contacted staff with an updated landscape plan and
indicated that the planting would occur this month.
5. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning for on Schendel
property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14 -027). The City Council approved the request on
December 11, 2014 and granted the applicant 2 years to apply for the final plat and final PUD
development plan. Peachtree Partners did not buy the property, but a different developer could still
proceed with the approved plan. The next step would be for a developer to submit a final PUD plan
and plat prior to expiration of the approvals on December 11, 2016.
6. Corcoran Public Works Site Plan Amendment and Variance (city file 15 -006). The site plan
amendment and variance are to grant after - the -fact approvals for changes to the approved site plan
that were made in the field and generally authorized by the subcommittee. The gravel drive and
storage area that was added on the south area of the fenced yard requires a variance. The item was
reviewed and approved in April 2015. Final landscaping and close out issues will occur this spring.
MEMORANDUM
7. Commercial Door Addition at 7670 Commerce Street (City file 15 -010) The City received an
application for approval of a building addition, which required a conditional use permit, interim use
permit, variance and site plan approval. The project was reviewed at a public hearing at the June 4th
Planning Commission meeting and was approved by the City Council on June 25th. The required
landscaping will be finalized and constructed after the downtown infrastructure project is completed.
The City will release the remaining escrow when the planting is completed.
8. Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a new Verizon Monopole at 23605 Co Rd 50 (PID30-
119-23-21 -0001) (City File 15 -016). Verizon has requested a conditional use permit and site plan for
a new telecommunications tower on the Gleason property located at the southwest corner of County
Roads 19 & 50. The public hearing was held at the Planning Commission on July 71h and they voted
unanimously to recommend approval. The City Council approved this item on July 23rd. The
applicant is working to address the conditions of approval and then will apply for a building permit.
9. "Fehn Meadows" Preliminary Plat and Final Plat at 20909 County Road Number 117 (PID # 03-
119 -23 -12 -0002 and PID 03- 119 -23 -13 -0001) (city file no. 15 -018). The applicant is requesting
approval of a plat to readjust the lot lines between two parcels to create one lot and one outlot. The
Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 3rd and voted unanimously to recommend
approval. The City Council approved the preliminary plat and final plat on October 8th. The next step
is for the applicant to address any conditions of approval, submit the mylars for City signature and
record the documents at the County.
8. "Strehler Estates" Final Plat (PID 17- 119 -23 -32 -0004) (city file no. 16 -001). The applicant
submitted a request for approval of a preliminary plat to create 4 lots and an ordinance amendment to
allow a private drive for property at 22900 Strehler Road. The City Council approved both items on
October 8th. The final plat was approved by the City Council at the January 28th meeting. The
applicant is working to address the conditions of approval and then will record the final plat at
Hennepin County.
MEMORANDUM
I
CITY OF CORCORAN
8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340
763.420.2288 — Office 763.420.6056 — Fax
E -mail - general(cDci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us
MEMO
Meeting Date: May 5, 2016
To: Planning Commission
From: Brad Martens, City Administrator
Re: City Council Report
The Planning Commission last met on April 7, 2016. The following is a recap of some of
the items discussed at City Council meetings since that time. A full recap can be found
by reviewing the approved City Council minutes on the website
April 14, 2016
• Open Forum
o Representatives from Equalized Assessment Solutions introduced
themselves and stated they were providing a quote for assessment services
• Construction Materials Testing Service — Downtown Utility and Street Improvement
Project
o Approved an agreement with Braun Intertec for testing services
• City Council Liaison Expectations at Council Meetings
o Reviewed comments from commissioners on expectations of
Councilmembers at commission meetings
• Anticipated Water Quality Regulations and Projected Impact
o Reviewed anticipated work related to water quality regulations; heard an
update from Commissioner Jon Bottema on discussions at the Elm Creek
Watershed Commission
• General Obligation Bonds — Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project
o Heard an update on the City's bond rating and results of a bond sale;
awarded the sale of bonds for the project with a true interest cost of 1.72 %;
the interest was around 2% so this is great news
EM
• Charter Commission Application — Jennifer Russel
o Received an application from Jennifer Russel to become a Charter
Commission member; appointed her to the Charter Commission
• Public Works Crew Leader — Job Description and Recruitment Process
o Approved the job description and authorized the City Administrator to begin
the internal recruitment process; the position is open to any full -time
employee of the City of Corcoran
• Neighborhood Meeting Recap — Willow Drive Improvement Project
o Received a report following up from the March 291h neighborhood meeting;
staff was directed to work on obtaining financial information related to
maintaining paved and gravel roads, and to draft an assessment policy for
review
• 2015 Surplus Allocation
o Council discussed options for re- allocating a surplus; staff was directed to
bring back additional information for review at the next meeting
• Easement Agreements — Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project
o Approved seven easement purchase agreements for the project
• Closed Session — Consider an Offer for the Purchase of Real Estate — Easement
Acquisition for the Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project
o Council provided staff direction for offers related to easement acquisition for
the project
April 28, 2016
The following is a list of some of the items that are on the agenda for the April 28th
meeting. This report was completed prior to the meeting taking place:
• Annual Fire Department Reports — Hanover Fire Department, Loretto Fire
Department, Rogers Fire Department
• Elm Creek Watershed Commissioner Appointment — Jonathan Bottema
• Assessing Contract Review
• Public Hearing — Ravinia 4th Addition Vacation (City file 16 -004)
• Ravinia 4th Addition PUD Final Plan and Plat (City file 16 -004)
• Park Dedication Ordinance Amendment — Draft for Council Review (City file 16 -006)
• Solar Ordinance Discussion (City file 16 -008)
• 2015 Surplus Allocation
• 2016 Road Stabilization Program
Attachments:
N/A