Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-09-03 - Planning Commission Agenda PacketCITY OF CORCORAN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 7:00 PM -THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Open Forum 4. Approval of: a. Agenda b. *July 7, 2015 Planning Commission Minutes 5. New Business a. PUBLIC HEARING. Preliminary Plat and Ordinance Amendment for "Strehler Estates" for property at 22900 Strehler Road (PID 17- 119 -23 -32 -0004) (city file no. 15 -017) i. Staff Report ii. Open Public Hearing iii. Public Comment iv. Close Hearing V. Commission Discussion & Recommendation b. PUBLIC HEARING. Preliminary Plat for Tehn Meadows" at 20909 County Road Number 117 (PID # 03- 119 -23 -12 -0002 and PID 03- 119 -23 -13 -0001) (city file no. 15 -018) i. Staff Report ii. Open Public Hearing iii. Public Comment iv. Close Hearing V. Commission Discussion & Recommendation 6. Reports: a. *Planning Project Update b. *City Council Report — Councilmember Keefe c. Other Business 7. Adjournment *Literature to review Material relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet, located near the entrance to the Council Chambers Meeting Area. CITY OF CORCORAN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 7:00 PM - TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2015 The Corcoran Planning Commission met on July 7, 2015, at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were: Chair Jacobs, Vice -chair Ravnholdt, Commissioner Wu, Commissioner Theis, and Commissioner Schultz. Also present were: Council Liaison Hank, Administrator Martens, City Planner Lindahl, Planner Matze, and Code Compliance Official Pritchard. 1. Call to Order Chair Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:00pm 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Open Forum — None 4. Approval of: a. Agenda Motion made by Ravnholdt seconded by Theis to approve the agenda as presented. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) b. April 2, 2015 Planning Commission Minutes Motion made by Wu seconded by Schultz to approve the minutes as presented. Voting Aye: Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 3:0) Jacobs and Ravnholdt abstained. c. June 4, 2015 Planning Commission Minutes Motion made by Theis seconded by Ravnholdt to approve the minutes as presented. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 4:0) Wu abstained. 5. New Business a. PUBLIC HEARING. Sign Ordinance Update (city file 15 -012) i. Staff Report — Planner Matze presented her staff report. ii. Open Public Hearing — Chair Jacobs opened the public hearing. (7:24pm) iii. Public Comment — Sean Leuer, Westside Tire, asked for clarification on a number of issues including the reason for the update, how it would affect existing signs, cost of new requirements to business owners, and which communities were compared when writing the ordinance. Mr. Leuer also commented that the 12 second requirement for dynamic displays is too long for businesses located on roads with higher speed limits and should be less and that the new requirements may deter future growth as basic signs would not be allowed. He stated that the new sign requirements are expensive options and requiring expensive signage would discourage existing businesses to upgrade.. Tom Gleason, Pro -Tech Auto, stated that he was "happy" the sign ordinance was being addressed and that he would finally be able to complete the update to his sign. He also asked for clarification on the "strong sign" language. Mr. Gleason also said that electronic message boards are expensive and he would like to see manual message boards allowed. He thanked the Commission for their time and for reviewing the ordinance. Tim Laurent, Motor Cafe, stated that he was excited about the update and that the inclusion of dynamic signage was a great option for businesses to present information as it is very important. Mr. Laurent also asked for clarification regarding existing signage. He also shared concerns that a 12 second requirement for dynamic signage seemed long and that the 35% limit may be too small. Mr. Laurent shared that overall the proposed ordinance appears flexible and comparable. Dick Denison, 22741 Wagon Wheel Lane, submitted a letter to be entered into the public hearing. He stated that he was "generally in agreement" with the proposal but raised some concerns: he stated that some of the sign sizes were more generous than neighboring areas and the 16' height may be excessive next to residential areas. Mr. Denison also stated that the City should consider signs facing residential areas to go dark or be turned off at a specific time after the business closes and shared concerns for brightness. iv. Close Hearing Motion made by Ravnholdt seconded by Wu to close the public hearing. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) (7:46pm) V. Commission Discussion & Recommendation — The commission asked staff to clarify concerns and answer questions raised during the public hearing. Staff confirmed that updating the sign ordinance was determined to be a Council priority as it is important to businesses. The new ordinance gives many more options, increases signage size, type, lessens regulations, and allows new technology. Staff confirmed that signs legally existing at the time of approval of the updated ordinance would become legal non - conforming and are allowed to remain. Legal non - conforming signs are protected by state statue and are allowed to be maintained and repaired, but if the sign is removed it would have to comply with new standards. The Commission discussed manually changeable message boards and stated that there use was common for churches, community organizations and events. Staff confirmed that this type of sign would still be allowed on a temporary basis. Staff confirmed that approximately 25 cities were compared while drafting the update as well as sign industry standards. The Commission asked if "blade" (projecting) signs would be allowed in the downtown district. It was confirmed that they would be allowed. Staff clarified that the terms "back -lit" and "halo" are interchangeable and have the same definition. The Commission asked why incandescent lighting was addressed even though the technology was being phased out. Staff confirmed that it is regulated and allowed as to not limit the signs design. Staff confirmed that the 12 second dynamic change requirement is consistent with industry standards. Staff clarified the term "strong sign" did not necessarily refer to the structural integrity of the sign but more the design and size of the base (monument). Staff stated that raising the maximum sign size was because the current ordinance was very limited, especially for large buildings. Staff also clarified that signage was only allowed on 1 side (frontage) of the building and that a typical site plan process would assure thoughtful orientation of the building. In response to Mr. Denison's concerns, staff confirmed that the new ordinance addresses and regulates illumination standards including type of lighting, glare, brightness, etc., but does not require darkening of signs at night. The Commission asked how the 35% dynamic sign limit was determined. Staff confirmed that Council directed staff to allow dynamic signage as accessory to the main sign. The sign area was based on research of the surrounding communities and industry standards. Mr. Duffy, Think Digital Signs, offered an option for the dynamic sign size. He suggested that allowing a 37.5% maximum size would allow for a standard sized 24 square foot, 3'x8' dynamic sign on the proposed maximum 64 square foot monument sign that would be allowed as part of the ordinance update. The Commission and staff supported raising the dynamic sign size to 37.5 %. Staff confirmed that dynamic displays cannot flash or scroll but would be allowed to fade between messages. This requirement would not apply to window signs, such as displays. Staff confirmed that entrance and exit signs would be allowed to be freestanding and lit. The Commission asked if the new requirements would apply to hospital /emergency room signs. Staff confirmed that it would apply to these uses and a variance would be required if the standards were not met. Staff confirmed that business vehicles would be allowed signage except that vehicles parked solely for signage /advertising would not be allowed. Staff clarified that signs installed on parapets were and still would be treated as wall signs. The Commission and staff clarified that the new requirements would offer business owners options of both small inexpensive signage as well as larger more elaborate signs. Mr. Duffy, Think Digital Signs, stated that the ordinance update gives a large range of cost options and flexibility. Tim Laurent, Motor Cafe, offered an example that he was able to install a 15' individual letter sign for less than $1,000 and that the new ordinance gave more options. He also asked for clarification if illumination was optional. Staff confirmed that lighting is allowed and regulated, but not required. Motion made by Ravnholdt seconded by Wu to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment with a change to 7b of the ordinance to raise the maximum dynamic sign allowance from 35% to 37.5 %. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) Motion made by Schultz seconded by Wu to recommend approval of the findings of fact. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) b. PUBLIC HEARING. Ordinance amendment to allow creation of lots without development rights (city file 15 -014) i. Staff Report — City Planner Lindahl presented her staff report. ii. Open Public Hearing — Chair Jacobs opened the public hearing. (9:02pm) iii. Public Comment — None iv. Close Hearing Motion made by Wu seconded by Theis to close the public hearing. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) (9:02pm) V. Commission Discussion & Recommendation — Staff laid out examples of how the proposed ordinance would affect land owners within the city and clarified that the creation of lots without development rights would only be allowed on lots that may in the future have development rights available. Staff also confirmed that a legal document stating the secondary lot is unbuildable would be required to be recorded with the plat at the county. Motion made by Theis seconded by Ravnholdt to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment and findings of fact as presented. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) At 9:17pm, a short recess was taken; the meeting reconvened at 9:20pm. c. PUBLIC HEARING. New Verizon Monopole at 23605 Co Rd 50 (PID 30- 119 -23- 21 -0001) (City File 15 -016) i. Staff Report — City Planner Lindahl presented her staff report. ii. Open Public Hearing — Chair Jacobs opened the public hearing. (9:32pm) iii. Public Comment — Paul Harrington, Buell Consulting / Verizon, was in attendance. Mr. Harrington stated that he believed all staff concerns were addressed and supported the proposed resolution. He said that he was available for questions. iv. Close Hearing Motion made by Theis seconded by Wu to close the public hearing. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) (9:54pm) V. Commission Discussion & Recommendation — The Commission asked for clarification from the applicant on a number of issues. Mr. Harrington clarified that the monopole was designed to carry 2 additional telecommunication antennas. The commission inquired about location of ground equipment for future antennas to be added as they were not shown on the plan. Staff confirmed that this would be addressed in the future via a site plan by the company adding the equipment and that a "ghost- plat" is not required for this type of project. Mr. Harrington stated the fencing would be 6' high chain -link with 3 line barbed wire top. The total height and capacity was clarified. Also clarified were landscaping requirements and future expansion requirements. Motion made by Ravnholdt seconded by Theis to recommend approval of the resolution as presented with minor correction to condition 7c. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) 6. Reports: a. Planning Project Update — Information only b. City Council Report — Councilmember Hank — Information only c. Other Business — None 7. Adjournment Motion made by Ravnholdt seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye: Jacobs, Ravnholdt, Wu, Theis, and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 10:15pm. Submitted by Mike Pritchard Code Compliance Official Agenda Item 5_a. i i . L A N D F O R M 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 TO: Corcoran Planning Commission FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform i Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 www.landform.net DATE: August 27, 2015 for the September 3, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting RE: PUBLIC HEARING. Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Preliminary Plat for "Strehler Estates" on property located at 22900 Strehler Road (PID 17- 119 -23 -32 -0004) (city file no. 15 -017) 120 -DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: December 1, 2015 1. Application Request Craig Scherber of Scherber Investments is requesting approval of a preliminary plat to create 4 lots from one 80.06 -acre lot. There is an existing house on the property. Mr. Scherber is also requesting approval of an ordinance amendment to allow for a private drive to serve the proposed lots. 2. Context The 80 -acre parcel has one existing home and 3 remaining development rights. The proposed development would utilize all of the building rights on this property. Background On June 12, 2015 the City reviewed a concept plan and approved a topography waiver for the portion of the site that would not be impacted by development. Zoning and Land Use The property is zoned Rural Residential and is guided Rural /Ag Residential. The property is located outside of the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area). The surrounding properties are zoned Rural Residential and guided Rural / Ag Residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a number of wetlands scattered throughout the site. The northeast portion of the site is shown on the Hennepin County natural resource inventory as an ecologically significant area and is part of the Corcoran Greenway Corridor shown on the Parks and Trails Plan. Landform ®, SensiblyGrecn® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. • Parks and Trails i e 0 i The Parks and Trails Map from 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a proposed horseback trail along the northern lot line and a proposed on -road trail on Strehler Road. Access The existing home is served by a driveway off Strehler Road. The applicant is proposing to construct a private drive to serve the existing home and 3 new lots. 3. Analysis Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision - Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying an ordinance amendment. The proposed ordinance amendment must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed ordinance amendment is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City must deny the ordinance amendment. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving a preliminary and final plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Ordinance Amendment Background The applicant has requested that the Council consider an ordinance amendment to allow a private drive to serve the proposed lots. In the spring, both this land owner and another landowner requested that they be allowed to provide access to these new subdivisions with private drives in lieu of a public street. When staff from all departments met to discuss the issue, staff recommended that private streets not be allowed. Staff recommended that new development be required to comply with the ordinance requirements that prohibit private drives. Staff noted the following: 1. Public streets allow the City to plan for a comprehensive connected street system. Goal 1, Policy 1 of Chapter 8 (Transportation) of the Comprehensive Plan states that "The City will provide a comprehensive transportation system based upon functional classification of roadways that fully promotes connectivity and is coordinated with neighboring cities and counties." The Zoning Ordinance supports the Comprehensive Plan by requiring new subdivisions to extend public streets to property lines to easily allow for new connections. Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file 15 -017) September 3, 2015 i • i Private drives will prohibit connections that would allow for new development and limit the ability to coordinate the street system with neighboring cities and counties. 2. Public streets ensure that regular maintenance occurs. This is important to make sure the roads are plowed and that regular maintenance occurs to ensure public access in case of emergency. 3. The City of Corcoran has had challenges with private drives not being properly maintained and residents coming to the City after the fact to ask the City to take over the private drive. This is problematic because private drives are not built to the same high standard as public streets. If the City agrees to take over the private drive, it leaves the City and residents open to safety and legal risks. While developers appreciate the lower construction costs of a private drive, the long -term maintenance and upkeep of the road has proven to be challenging for residents. The Council expressed some willingness to consider an ordinance change and noted that private drives would reduce the City costs for maintenance of long public streets with few benefitting landowners. Staff continues to recommend that new development be required to be accessed via a public street, however, because an application request was made to allow private drives we have drafted language to allow private drives if the Planning Commission and City Council wish to allow. Proposed Amendment Access to the parcel is currently limited to Strehler Road and construction of a new street is required to provide access to the newly created lots. The applicant feels that constructing a public road for these lots is both cost prohibitive for the applicant and has long term maintenance costs for the City. The applicant proposed a private drive in their sketch plan presentation on June 12, 2015. After consideration of the sketch plan, they expressed some support for the idea and suggested that the applicant submit a request for an ordinance amendment that allows private drives. The Council asked that that ensure the City and future landowners are protected. Staff reviewed standards for private drives in rural areas of Minnesota as well as standards from communities in other parts of the Midwest. Based on review of these standards, staff has prepared a draft Ordinance for review. The draft ordinance addresses the primary concerns often raised by cities, including maintenance and easement requirements, an association that is funded for long term costs and signage /design to be clear that it is a private drive. The primary changes are as follows to Section 945.020 (Design Standards), Subd. 20 of the Subdivision Ordinance, as follows: Subd. 20. Alleys and Private Drives. Alleys and private drives may be permitted by the City Council, and are subject to the following standards: Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file 15 -017) September 3, 2015 i IC. • • A. Private Drives in the Rural Residential District. In conjunction with the review of plats in the Rural Residential District Zoning District, the City Council may approve private drives provided that all of the following conditions are met: 1. Design Standards. a. A private drive shall not exceed 2,640 feet in length unless it forms a continuous connection or loops back to a public street. Any such private drive with a terminus 1,320 feet or more from the nearest intersection will be required to provide a cul -de- sac at the closed end according to City Engineering Standards. b. The subdivider shall provide access to lots via public streets. Private drives are subject to the access standards of 945.020, Subd. 12, D and 945.020 Subd. 12, F. c. Roadway standards must comply Section 945.010, Subd. 5 (Engineering Design Standards). Private drives shall conform to the City of Corcoran Standard Detail Plates for shared driveways, as may be amended. The City Engineer may require additional site information and may require additional design standards that enhance safety. d. Individual unit driveways that gain access from any such private drive shall be a minimum of 22 feet in length. e. A decorative sign stating "Private Drive" shall be located near each entrance to a private drive. Such sign shall also provide the range of addresses served by the private drive. 2. Lot Standards. a. Areas devoted to private roads shall not be included in parcel size calculations. b. The private drive may not be placed in an outlot, and must be included with the parcel. c. Lot width shall be measured at the lot line. For purpose of complying with the minimum lot width requirements, the front of the lot shall be the lot line adjacent to the private drive. d. Access for each lot in the subdivision shall be from the private drive. No direct access to public streets shall be allowed for lots within the subdivision. 3. Easement and Maintenance Agreement. An access easement and maintenance agreement shall be established for all private drives, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney and shall be recorded at Hennepin County prior to issuing building permits. Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file 15 -017) September 3, 2015 i 1 • • 4. Homeowners Association Agreement. A homeowners association agreement shall be established to ensure that any such private drive remains "private" in perpetuity, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney, and shall be filed with the plat at Hennepin County. Such instrument shall require mandatory participation of all homeowners that have access via the private drive, shall include the requirement for creation of a fund to address maintenance, drainage and snow removal on the private drive, subject to City review and approval. We are also adding two new definitions to both the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance and modifying the Zoning Ordinance "Lot Line, Front" definition to ensure consistency: DRIVE, PRIVATE: Land not dedicated as a public street, over which a public access easement for street purposes has been granted, which intersects or connects with a public street and where an access easement and maintenance agreement has been recorded at Hennepin County. The easement shall allow for access by police, emergency vehicles, trash collection, and other service vehicles. DRIVEWAY. A paved or unpaved access strip of land providing a vehicular connector between the public right -of -way of the street or private drive and the parking space or garage of a property. LOT LINE, FRONT.- That boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street or private drive easement, and in the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or private drive easement. If the dimensions of a corner lot are reasonably equal, the front lot line shall be designated by the owner and filed with the City. However, all front lot lines shall be subject to the front setback requirements. The draft ordinance limits construction of private drives to the Rural Residential Zoning District to address the recent requests that have been made at sketch plan reviews. The proposed ordinance looks to existing standards in the Corcoran City Code as a basis for construction and aims to protect the public safety of the residents, while limiting the City's role in maintaining the roads. As proposed, the new ordinance will require that private drives be constructed to meet City engineering standards for shared driveways. The proposed standards limit the length of the private drive to' /Z mile (2,640 feet), which is more than the permitted road length of 1,320 feet for public streets in Section 945.020, Subd. 12 of the City Code. Due to private road maintenance and the rural nature of the district, staff feels that exceeding the maximum road length required by the subdivision standards is warranted for private drives. • While this is longer than the standard, staff felt that the size of the rural lots warranted a longer street allowance. In part, that is because there are no opportunities to link private drives with adjacent properties (because each drive must be separately maintained by homeowners). • The Commission may wish to comment on the length of the drive. Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file 15 -017) September 3, 2015 i • • i The proposed ordinance allows for gravel or bituminous private drives, according to the engineering standards for driveways. The applicant is proposing a gravel private drive. Staff notes that new public streets in the RR district are allowed to be constructed as a gravel street, but that paved streets are encouraged through the use of development rights increasing when the street is paved. The Commission may wish to comment on gravel vs. paved on a private drive. Staff is also recommending that plats include an access easement be provided over the private drive and that a homeowners association agreement and maintenance agreement be recorded at Hennepin County with the final plat. Staff believes that creation of the private drive with these standards and the HOA document, easement and maintenance agreement will provide protections for both the homeowners and the City. If the Council approves a private drive for this development, the applicant will need to update the plans to show a private drive easement. Staff is also recommending that the definitions be updated to differentiate between streets, private drives, and driveways. Preliminary Plat Lot Size The proposed plat would create one lot for the existing home and three additional lots for the construction of new homes. The proposed lot dimensions are as follows: The proposed lot sizes meet the RR District minimum lot size of 2 acres, however, it appears that Lot 2 does not meet the minimum lot width requirements. Staff has included a condition of approval that the applicant demonstrate lot width compliance or adjust the lot line to meet the required 200 - foot lot width standards for the Rural Residential District. Well and Septic Primary septic fields (A) and secondary septic fields (B) are shown on each lot. Well locations have not been identified. The applicant should show the proposed location of the wells on the preliminary plat submitted with the final plat application. The applicant will need to demonstrate approval of well and septic design and locations by Hennepin County prior to issuance of a building permit. Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file 15 -017) September 3, 2015 Lot Area Lot Width At front lot line Lot 1 (Existing Home 9.09 acres 602.00 feet Lot 2 5.50 acres 552.88 feet Lot 3 5.78 acres 180 feet (approx.) Lot 4 59.19 acres 792.76 feet The proposed lot sizes meet the RR District minimum lot size of 2 acres, however, it appears that Lot 2 does not meet the minimum lot width requirements. Staff has included a condition of approval that the applicant demonstrate lot width compliance or adjust the lot line to meet the required 200 - foot lot width standards for the Rural Residential District. Well and Septic Primary septic fields (A) and secondary septic fields (B) are shown on each lot. Well locations have not been identified. The applicant should show the proposed location of the wells on the preliminary plat submitted with the final plat application. The applicant will need to demonstrate approval of well and septic design and locations by Hennepin County prior to issuance of a building permit. Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file 15 -017) September 3, 2015 • i i Streets The preliminary plat submitted by the applicant shows a 33 -foot right -of -way for Strehler Road, which is not sufficient right -of -way for the future pedestrian and bicycle trail that is shown in Corcoran's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. To provide space for future pedestrian /bicycle accommodations, staff recommends that an additional 7 feet of right of way be provided to increase the half right -of -way to a total of 40 feet. This width will be consistent with the right -of -way provided on the property directly to the west of the property and right -of -way required for other recent subdivisions on Minor Collector streets like Strehler. Staff has included a condition requiring the applicant to update the plat to show a 40- foot' /2 right -of -way on Strehler Road. If the City Council approves the ordinance to allow private drives, they would allow for the construction of the private drive. Staff has included a condition that the applicant will need to comply with the standards of the new ordinance. Staff also notes that the proposed private drive is in close proximity to the neighboring drive on the eastern parcel. While the proposed driveway is in compliance with drive aisle setback requirements, combining the drives would increase safety by minimizing the number of access points to Strehler Road. While combining the drives is not required, staff recommends that if the neighbor is amenable to participating in the shared maintenance agreement for the drive, that this would be the preferred option for the City. If City Council were to permit construction of a private drive to provide access to the new lots, this would prevent future connection of Larsen Road to the subdivision and limit future opportunities to subdivide the property. If Council were to require a public street, there could be an opportunity to provide future connections to other public streets. A private drive as shown limits the options for an inter - connected street network in the City. Public Safety Review Plans were sent to the fire department on July 24, 2015. The Fire Marshal noted that the drive serving Lot 4 must be wide enough to provide access for emergency vehicles and that it must be capable of supporting the weight of emergency vehicles. Natural Characteristics of the Site The proposed lots are proposed on land that is currently used for agricultural purposes. The eastern portion of Lot 4 is identified as ecologically significant habitat and is part of the Greenway Corridor identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is limiting development to the western 1/3 of Lot 4, and is not proposing to impact the ecologically significant areas of the lot. The applicant is proposing an easement over the majority of the eastern 2/3 of Lot 4. Wetlands The National Wetlands Inventory Map shows wetlands on the eastern 2/3 of proposed Lot 4. Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file 15 -017) September 3, 2015 i • • • A wetland delineation was completed and was submitted to the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission ( ECWMC) for review and approval. The ECWMC approved the delineation on August 7, 2015. On July 31, 2015, the ECWMC provided several comments regarding the plan set, but did not make any formal recommendations. The applicant should work with the ECWMC to address their comments. The applicant will need to comply with their ECWMC standards for wetland buffers as well as Corcoran's standards for wetland overlay districts. The ECWMC recently adopted new rules that are inconsistent with the City of Corcoran's adopted Wetland Overlay District standards. It is the applicant's responsibility to comply with the more restrictive of these standards. Wetland buffers, setbacks, and markers will need to be shown on the plans for all of the wetlands including those located under the drainage and utility easement shown on the eastern portion of Lot 4. Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance provides standards for wetlands. Wetland buffer requirements vary based on the quality of the wetland. The applicant and staff have determined that these are Medium Quality wetlands for the purpose of the wetland buffer requirements. Wetland buffers, setbacks, and buffer monuments are required to be installed when the property is platted. Staff has included a condition that the plans be revised to show the wetland buffer, buffer setbacks, and monuments. Wetland buffer monuments must installed prior to issuance of a building permit. Section 1050.10, Subd. 5 requires that buffers around wetlands are planted with vegetation in accordance with Section 1050.10, Subd. 8, Buffer Strip Vegetation Performance Standards. Staff has included a condition that will require the applicant to comply with these standards. Drainage and Utility Easements Section 945.060, Subd. 2 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires 10 -foot drainage and utility easements around the perimeter of the lot. The proposed development primarily complies with this requirement, but is missing a portion of the drainage and utility easement on the northwestern portion of Lot 4 (directly north of the proposed septic sites). Staff has included a condition that the plans be updated to show the drainage and utility easement around the entire perimeter of the site. Plans should locate any known drain tiles located on property. Staff has included a condition that the plans be updated to show any known drain tiles. Parks and Trails Staff notes that Section 955.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance states "Park Dedication is only due in cases where additional new parcels are created." The subdivision will create one new lot for the existing home and three new lots, therefore, park dedication is required for three new lots. A future horse trail is shown in the Comprehensive Plan along the north lot line. Section 955.020, Subd. 6 requires that subdividers dedicate park, trails, or open space or cash in lieu of land. However, last year Council members supported cash in lieu of land for subdivisions in the Rural Residential zoning district, even when there is a trail shown in the Comprehensive Plan. Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file 15 -017) September 3, 2015 i • • 0 Under the current ordinance, park dedication is required at 10% of the net buildable land area. Because the applicant did not provide gross and net land densities, we have shown a park dedication calculation based on gross densities of Lots 2, 3, and 4. Staff is recommending that the applicant provide gross and net buildable densities to accurately calculate the required park dedication. The following table shows the process by which park dedication is calculated: If the Council decides that cash in lieu of land is preferable to trail dedication, the applicant will be required to pay $9,000. If the Council were to require dedication of land, the required dedication would be as follows: Trail area required Gross Net Buildable Required dedication (17% of 7.04 acres) 80.06 acres 70.47 7.04 acres of land Total 1.2 acres PLUS $7,470 estimated 10% of 32 acres Land Value $1,019,000 $896,942 $89,694 ($12,728/Ac (70.47 x ($896,942 x 10 %) re) $12,728) (Max $3,000 per dwelling unit Maximum Cash - - $9,000 Per unit (3 x $3,000 per dwelling unit Total 7.04 Acres OR $9,000 If the Council decides that cash in lieu of land is preferable to trail dedication, the applicant will be required to pay $9,000. If the Council were to require dedication of land, the required dedication would be as follows: Trail area required Cash required 1.2 acres $7,470 (17% of 7.04 acres) 100 %- 17 % =83% $9,000 x 83 %= $3,300 Total 1.2 acres PLUS $7,470 The City Council will provide direction about whether or not they will require land dedication for the park trail shown in the Comprehensive Plan. • Based on the most recent Council direction, staff has prepared a resolution requiring cash in lieu of land for the 3 new lots. C. Conclusions Staff recommends denial of the ordinance amendment to allow private drives. However, based on the previous Council comments, we prepared an ordinance and resolution for approval. If the Planning Commission also finds that private streets are not desirable, they should provide a recommendation with findings of fact for denial. Staff has reviewed the preliminary plat for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. Staff noted in the staff report Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file 15 -017) September 3, 2015 i • 0 • the outstanding issues that must be addressed and have included conditions in the attached draft resolutions to address these issues. If the ordinance amendment is not approved, the City must deny the preliminary plat application due to the finding that the lots do not have the required access on a public street. 4. Action The Planning Commission should either: A. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat and ordinance amendment, subject to the findings and conditions in the attached resolution. Or B. Recommend denial of the ordinance amendment and preliminary plat. The Commission should provide findings of fact. Attachments 1. Draft Ordinance Amendment allowing private drives 2. Draft Resolution approving findings of fact for the ordinance amendment 3. Draft Resolution approving preliminary plat 4. Aerial Location Map 5. ECWMC memo dated July 31, 2015 6. ECWMC Notice of Approval dated August 7, 2015 7. Comments from Metro West dated August 3, 2015 8. Engineer's Memo dated August 4, 2015 9. Preliminary Plat 10. Applicant's graphics Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file 15 -017) 10 September 3, 2015 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -xxx Motion By: Seconded By: October xx, 2015 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE ENTITLED ZONING ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendments. The text of Section 945.020 of Chapter 9 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stFickeR material and adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 1. Lot Arrangement. The lot arrangement shall be such that there will be no foreseeable difficulties, for reasons of topography or other conditions, in securing building permits to build on all lots in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, all lots shall abut and have direct access to an improved street or private drive except for developments with unit lots, in which case the base lot shall abut and have direct access to an improved street. AND Subd. 12. Access. D. The subdivider shall provide access to all lots via local streets or private drives. When a proposed plat contains or borders on the right -of -way of a principal arterial, vehicle access points shall be restricted in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the access requirements of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Hennepin County. When a proposed plat contains or borders on the right -of -way of a minor arterial or major collector roadway, vehicle access points shall be restricted from such roadways. If access onto a minor arterial or major collector is the only option for access and is therefore required, such vehicle access points shall be limited from individual lots onto such streets through the use of shared driveways, consistent with the access management provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan. AND Subd. 20. Alleys and Private Drives. Alleys and private drives may be permitted by the City Council, and are subject to the following standards: A. Private Drives in the Rural Residential District. In conjunction with the review of plats in the Rural Residential District Zoning District, the City Council may approve private drives provided that all of the followina conditions are met: Page 1 of 4 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -xxx 1. Design Standards. October xx, 2015 a. A private drive shall not exceed 2,640 feet in length unless it forms a continuous connection or loops back to a public street. Any such private drive with a terminus 1,320 feet or more from the nearest intersection will be required to Drovide a cul -de -sac at the closed end accordina to Citv Enaineerina Standards. b. The subdivider shall provide access to lots via public streets. Private drives are subject to the access standards of 945.020, Subd.12, D and 945.020 Subd. 12, F. c. Roadway standards must comply Section 945.010, Subd. 5 (Engineering Design Standards). Private drives shall conform to the City of Corcoran Standard Detail Plates for shared driveways, as may be amended. The City Engineer may require additional site information and may require additional design standards that enhance safety. d. Individual unit driveways that aain access from anv such private drive shall be a minimum of 22 feet in length. e. A decorative sign stating "Private Drive" shall be located near each entrance to a private drive. Such sign shall also provide the range of addresses served by the private drive. 2. Lot Standards. a. Areas devoted to private roads shall not be included in parcel size calculations. b. The private drive may not be placed in an outlot. and must be included with the parcel. c. Lot width shall be measured at the lot line. For purpose of complying with the minimum lot width requirements, the front of the lot shall be the lot line adjacent to the Drivate drive. d. Access for each lot in the subdivision shall be from the private drive. No direct access to public streets shall be allowed for lots within the subdivision. 3. Easement and Maintenance Agreement. An access easement and maintenance agreement shall be established for all private drives, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney and shall be recorded at Hennepin County prior to issuing building permits. 4. Homeowners Association Agreement. A homeowners association agreement shall be established to ensure that any such private drive remains "private" in perpetuity, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney, and shall be filed with the plat at Hennepin County. Such instrument shall require mandatory participation of all homeowners that have access via the private drive, shall include the requirement Page 2 of 4 City of Corcoran October xx, 2015 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -xxx for creation of a fund to address maintenance. drainaae and snow removal on the private drive, subject to City review and approval. SECTION 2. Amendments. The text of Section 915.020 of Chapter 9 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the sfr+ckeR material and adding the underlined material as follows: DRIVE, PRIVATE: Land not dedicated as a public street, over which a public access easement for street purposes has been granted, which intersects or connects with a public street and where an access easement and maintenance agreement has been recorded at Hennepin Countv. The easement shall allow for access by police. emeraencv vehicles. trash collection. and other service vehicles. DRIVEWAY: A paved or unpaved access strip of land providing a vehicular connector between the public right -of -way of the street or private drive and the parking space or garage of a property. SECTION 3. Amendments. The text of Section 1020.020 of Chapter 10 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the esker► material and adding the underlined material as follows: DRIVE. PRIVATE: Land not dedicated as a public street. over which a public access easement for street purposes has been granted, which intersects or connects with a public street and where an access easement and maintenance agreement has been recorded at Hennepin Countv. The easement shall allow for access by Dolice. emeraencv vehicles. trash collection. and other service vehicles. DRIVEWAY: A paved or unpaved access strip of land providing a vehicular connector between the public right -of -way of the street or private drive and the parking space or garage of a property. LOT LINE, FRONT: That boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street or private drive easement, and in the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or private drive easement. If the dimensions of a corner lot are reasonably equal, the front lot line shall be designated by the owner and filed with the City. However, all front lot lines abut streets shall be subject to the front setback requirements. Page 3 of 4 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -xxx October xx, 2015 SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Hank, Pat ❑ Keefe, Mike ❑ LaFave,Tonya ❑ Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Hank, Pat ❑ Keefe, Mike ❑ LaFave,Tonya ❑ Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this xx day of October 2015. ATTEST: Jessica Beise — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 4 of 4 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -xx Motion By: Seconded By: October xx, 2015 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF TITLE IX OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE ENTITLED ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran initiated an amendment to update the City Code to update the standards to allow private drives; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards and City policies; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Subdivision Ordinance text amendment and the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment, based on the finding that the proposed amendments would be consistent with State law and the City's Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Hank, Pat ❑ Keefe, Mike ❑ LaFave,Tonya ❑ Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Hank, Pat ❑ Keefe, Mike ❑ LaFave,Tonya ❑ Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this xx day of October 2015. ATTEST: Jessica Beise — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 1 of 1 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -xx Motion By: Seconded By: October xx, 2015 A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "STREHLER ESTATES" ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22900 STREHLER ROAD (PID 17- 119 -23 -32 -0004) (CITY FILE NO. 15 -017) WHEREAS, the Craig Scherber has requested approval of a preliminary plat to allow for the subdivision of the 80.09 acre property legally described as: The West Half of the Southwest Quarter except the West 659.91 feet thereof, The North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, The West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, all in Section 17, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the submitted preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a preliminary plat subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved, in accordance with the plans received by the City on July 20, 2015, and revisions received on August 3, 2015, except as amended by this resolution. 2. There are 0 development rights remaining on Lots 1 -4. 3. Approval is contingent on City Council approval of the ordinance amendment to allow private drives in the Rural Residential Zoning District. 4. Access for all four lots shall be from the new private drive. No direct access shall be allowed onto Strehler Road. 5. The application is subject to the review and approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. The applicant shall comply with any conditions of approval from the watershed. Where the City requirements are different than the watershed requirements, the applicant shall comply with the more restrictive standard. 6. The applicant must comply with the City Engineer's memo dated August 4, 2015. 7. Prior to release of the final plat, the applicant must: a. Revise plans to bring Lot 3, Block 1 into compliance with lot width standards. b. Revise plans to bring the private drive into compliance with Section 945.020, Subd. 20 (Alleys and Private Drives). Page 1 of 3 City of Corcoran October xx, 2015 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -xx c. Revise plans to provide a 40-foot 1/2 right -of -way for Strehler Road. d. Wetland buffers, buffer setbacks, and monuments must be shown on the preliminary plat in compliance with Section 1050.010, Subd. 5 for medium quality wetlands. e. Provide drainage and utility easements around all of Block 1. f. Show draintile locations must on the preliminary plat. g. Provide gross and net lot areas. h. The applicant shall prepare the following documents for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to recording: i. HOA documents ii. Private drive easement iii. Private drive maintenance agreement i. The applicant shall pay park dedication fees for the 3 new lots (Lot 2, Lot 3, and Lot 4). The City will require cash in lieu of land, subject to the park dedication requirements in place at the time the plat is released for filing. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant must: a. Construct the entire length of the private drive to ensure access to all four lots. b. Provide proof of Hennepin County approval of well and septic design and locations. c. Record the approving resolutions, mylar and all related documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. d. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs shall be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance: i. Erect all permanent wetland buffer monument signs as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. ii. Wetland buffer signs must be installed at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of 200 feet of wetland edge. iii. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. e. Lot corner monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. f. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plat drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. Page 2 of 3 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -xx 9. Prior to release of the escrow: October xx, 2015 a. The applicant must plant the wetland buffers in accordance with Section 1050.010, Subd. 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. Approval of the preliminary plat shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Hank, Pat ❑ Keefe, Mike ❑ LaFave,Tonya ❑ Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Hank, Pat ❑ Keefe, Mike ❑ LaFave,Tonya ❑ Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this xx day of October 2015. ATTEST: Jessica Beise — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 3 of 3 City Seal 7/22/2015 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Hen won eft Parcel Price. This map is a compilation of data from various 17- 119 -23 -32 -0004 A -T -B: Abstract ID: Sale 10/2003 representation or warranty expressed or Owner Ccs Partnershp Lp Market $1,019,000 Name: Total: purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and Parcel 22900 Strehler Rd Tax $11,853.80 Address: Corcoran, MN 55340 Total: (Payable: 2015) Property Vacant Land Code: Sale COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 Farm AL -n ;; 6 Y' --- r $660,000 Map Scale: 1 "= 800 ft. Print Date: 7/22/2015 Type. Price. This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Homestead Sale 10/2003 representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 79.56 acres Sale Area: 3,465,549 sq ft Vacant Land Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 AL -n ;; 6 Y' --- r hftps:Hgi s.hennepi n.us /Property /pri nt/default.aspx ?C= 451393 .5467500007,4995667.714400001 &L =5&T= hybri d &D= true &LID =O &F I D= 1711923320004 &VIS= 0,0,... 1/2 elm creek Watershed Management Commission ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 3235 Fernbrook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 PH: 763.553.1144 E -mail: judie @jass.biz TECHNICAL OFFICE Hennepin County Public Works Department of Environment and Energy 701 Fourth Ave. South, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55415 PH: 612.348.7338 E -mail: fames .kulawa(oDco.hennepin.mn.us Strehler Estates Corcoran, Proiect #2015 -020 Project Overview: This is an 80 acre parcel currently made up of cropland, meadow and woods. It is located north of Strehler Road, approximately 3/4 miles east of County Road 19. It is proposed to be developed into 4 rural residential lots, 9.1, 5.5, 5.8 and 59.2 acres in size. Site work will consist of grading a shared, private driveway (1,200 feet long) and construction of two stormwater ponds and drainage swales to said ponds. Applicant: Scherber Investments, 305 Lakeview Avenue, Tonka Bay, MN 55331. Phone: 612- 810 -8400. Email: cescherbergyahoo.com Engineer /Agent; Civil Engineering Site Design, Scott Dahlke, P.O. Box 566, 118 E. Broadway Street, Monticello, MN 55362. Phone: 763 - 314 -0929. Email: sdahlke @civilesd.com Exhibits: 1) Elm Creek WMC Request for Plan Review and Approval with $4,050 fee, received July 20, 2015. 2) Project 2015 -018w, Scherber Investments Wetland Delineation project file. a. Wetland Investigation Report by Anderson Engineering Inc. dated May 29, 2015 b. MN Notice of Application for wetland boundary /type by ECWMC, dated July 13, 2015. 3) Scherber Investments, Strehler Estates Drainage Analysis by Civil Engineering Site Design, dated July 9, 2015. 4) Strehler Estates Site Plans by Civil Engineering Site Design dated July 17, 2015. a. Sheet CO, Project Location Plan b. Sheet C1, Preliminary Plat c. Sheets C2 to C4, Plan & Profiles d. Sheets C5.1 to C5.3, Site Grading Plan e. Sheets C6 and C7, Detail Pond Grading Plan f. Sheet C8, Erosion Control Plan g. Sheets C9 and CIO, Details CHAMPLIN • CORCORAN • DAYTON • MAPLE GROVE • MEDINA • PLYMOUTH • ROGERS Strehler Estates (2015 -020) July 31, 2015 2 1 P a g e Findings; 1) A complete application was received July 20, 2015. The 60 -day deadline for a decision by the ECWMC, per MN Statute 15.99, expires September 18, 2015. 2) There are no floodplains located on this property. 3) This property has a drainage divide running through it that splits the water between the North Fork of Rush Creek and the Main stem of Rush Creek. The south 11 acres drains southerly into the main stem of Rush Creek. The remaining 69 acres drains north to the North Fork of Rush Creek. 4) The wetland delineation is currently under review by the Technical Evaluation Panel. A final decision will be provided under project 2015 -018w. 5) No wetland impacts are proposed on this project. 6) 25 foot wetland buffers are identified in the westerly section of the development, but not in the easterly 25 acres of lot 4, block 1. a. At a minimum the wetland and buffer areas on the complete parcel area will require easements. This must be provided for our review. 7) The easterly section of the parcel is identified in the Minnesota Land Cover and Classification System as a having a 16 acres moderate quality maple/basswood forest complex joined with a 5 acres moderate quality seasonally flooded mixed hardwood swamp. a. The property owner and/or the City should consider a conservation easement over the easterly section of the parcel to preserve the wetland and upland woods for the future. From discussions with the project engineer, he mentioned the owner envisions either farming or pasture uses in this area so is not interested in imposing a conservation easement. 8) The grading plan proposes to route the private driveway water into two ponds to help control flow rates and nutrients. 9) The northerly pond might be problematic in that it will be concentrating flows onto the neighbor's property that are more sheet type of flows now. a. It appears that drain tile are present in this area. Using the drain tile to intercept some of the low flows from the pond could be a potential option for this situation. 10) The following table is a breakdown of pre and post development flow rates and nutrient loads based on the specific watershed. These meet the Commission's standards for flow rates and water quality. Rush Creek 2 -Year (2.86 ") 10 -Year (4.26 ") 100 -year (7.13 ") Phosphorus Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) Loads ( lb./ yr) Pre - Development 9.4 18.3 38.3 9.9 Post - Development 3.5 9.6 28.8 5.7 N. Fork Rush Creek 2 -Year (2.86 ") 10 -Year (4.26 ") 100 -year (7.13 ") Phosphorus Loads ( lb./ yr) Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) Pre - Development 37.9 78.1 172.0 41.5 Post - Development 24.3 59.2 151.1 20.0 Strehler Estates (2015 -020) July 31, 2015 3 1 P a g e a. A stormwater management agreement with an operation and maintenance plan must be developed for the stormwater facilities on this site. The agreement with the O &M plan must be recorded with the property title. b. The ponding basins do not achieve a mean average depth of 4.0 feet as required by the Commission NURP standards. 11) Volume controls will be met through the use of the check dams with biofiltration soils and underdrains. These are proposed in the private road ditch (3 ditch checks) and in the drainage ditch (2 ditch checks) leading to the north pond. a. I would not recommend the check dams be placed in the driveway ditch sections. Utilities, snow storage and other various potential clogging problems with the ditch check dams will create poor infiltration and drainage issues in the ditch over time. b. Between the biofiltration system in the drainage ditch to the pond and the disconnection of the homes and roadway areas to any water resources, volume controls will be met without the roadway ditch checks. c. The ditch checks must be constructed with an overflow in the middle of the channel. i. The overflow must be 0.5 feet lower in the middle than on the sides 12) Drain tile is most likely located throughout the cropland on this site. We highly recommend it be located and decommissioned if it only affects this parcel. If it drains upstream areas through the property a drainage and utility easement is recommended over the tile line. 13) The Elm Creek Watershed encourages animal unit density standards for new large lot residential properties such as these. Toward that end we would recommend covenants /restrictions on these properties such as; a. One animal unit allowed for the first two grazable acres of land and one additional animal unit for each grazable acre of land thereafter. b. For any property with more than one animal unit, a pasture management plan must be instituted in accordance with U of MN Extension Service recommendations. 14) Ditch blocks such as bio -rolls or similar must be provided in the channel for erosion controls after grading. They must remain in place until vegetation is established in the ditches. 15) When the bio- retention system is installed in the ditch leading to the north pond, sediment controls must be in place to prevent sediment from entering the filter section of the ditch. These must remain in place until vegetation is established. Recommendation: None at this time. The NURP ponds must be designed to a mean average depth of 4.0 feet and the ditch checks must be provided with overflows. Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy Advisor to the Commission 6 -0 - July 31, 2015 Strehler Estates (2015 -020) July 31, 2015 4 1 P a g e 6F 1411.4' rir.rPk `PI 3'. `1G1 CORCORAN i ,. 4 4Y :M I *. T I-Aw Apo 11•: i ,r = r Strehler Estates (2015 -020) July 31, 2015 51Paee TOPOGRAPHY FROM A UDAR SURVEY LIMITS QF 1) TOPO �l �-� DELINEATED WETLAND° y{ AELINE-A1ED�AND r - .' DELINEATED NEPyIND � <• i �� °-J �-•,ti,j 25' WETLAND PROPOSED{ - BUFFER (TYP.) fS�pTIO (TYa.; �L�-' g ' • _ HOUSE (g)V,. DUJNEATEE WETLAND 1 j 'LOT + -40CK 1 N DELINEATE? WETLAl7 4-59.1 AC. PhOPDSEO I ] � BIi�FEW;S.Tf:tP I i - .�WAIY (T .] Ill ! \\ MONUMENTATION Sfgt (TYP.) /// /� I n '•.Y_.. PROPOSED STORMWATER BASIN r`_ D &U I EASEf.!EtiT ! 3 u.. i �,-,.t� t DE NEITE. WETLAN - , SWALE �.a 0 DELINEATED WETLAND. / ?��ATEI WETLAN 3 " ",{ K 1 �SF#ARED AGGREGATE . -_DRIVEWAY CUL -DE -SAC -T I _ k fly i, B�OcK I 5'0' I N i a � __ �� TOPOGRAPHY Fit LIDAR SURVEY j AC �. SHARED AGGREGATE OWNED ' r sssss rte... EXISTING AND MAINTAINED BY LOTS 1 -4 HOME D &U EASEMENT E7{ISTING GRAVEL ADJACENT PROPERTY STREHLER ROAD — EXISTING DRWXY ACCCESS FOR: RICrAY PROPOSED STORMWATER EXISTING HOUSE ACE€SS FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY A N Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) Address Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission 3235 Fernbrook Ln N, Plymouth, MN 55447 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Scherber Investments 14023 Strehler Road, Corcoran Application Number Strehler Estates 7/6/2015 2015 -018W ® Attach site locator map. Fype of Decision: ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑ No -Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan i ecnmcat rvatuation Fanet ttnamcs ana xecommenaation (it ® Approve ❑ Approve with conditions ❑ Deny Summary (or attach): A TEP met on the project site to view the wetland delineation boundaries and types and discuss the Wetland Investigation Report for Scherber Investments Parcel 22900 Strehler Road, Corcoran, MN, Anderson Engineering, dated May 29, 2015. The TEP recommended the LGU approve the delineation report wetland boundaries and types based on their site visit. The LGU agrees and hereby approves said investigation report. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: August 7, 2015 ® Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (include below) ❑ Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): The LGU agrees with the TEP that the wetland boundaries and types as provided in the Wetland Investigation Report for the Scherber Investments Parcel, 22900 Strehler Road, Corcoran 55340 by Anderson Engineering dated May 29, 2015 are accurate and hereby approves the delineation on this 79.56 acre parcel. BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Page 1 of 3 For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account # Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Name Title James C. Kujawa Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest Signature Date Phone Number and E -mail .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ❑ Financial Assurance: For project-specific replacement that is not in- advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ❑ Deed Recording: For project - specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑ Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Title James C. Kujawa Technical Advisor to the LGU Signature Date Phone Number and E -mail J_ August 7, 612 - 348 -7338 2015 James.kujawa @hennepin.us THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: ® Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send petition and $0 fee (if applicable) to: Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission 3235 Fernbrook Ln N Plymouth, MN 55447 ❑ Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send petition and $500 filing fee to: Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Page 2 of 3 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski (email only: Stacey. Lijewski @ hen nepin.us) ® BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer (email only: ben.meyer @state.mn.us) ❑ LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): ❑ DNR TEP member: ® DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member) Brooke Haworth (email only) brooke.haworth @state.mn.us ❑ WD or WMO (if applicable): ® Applicant and Landowner (if different) Scherber Investments, cescherber @yahoo.com. Anderson Engineering, bhodapp(a,ae- mn.com (email only) ® Members of the public who requested notice: (email only) City of Corcoran: Brad Martens; Kendra Lindahl ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager: Jenny, Melissa (email only: Melissa.M.Jenny @usace.army.mil) ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan decisions only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.nm.us/ aboutbwsr /workareas /WCA_areas.pdf )0-For a list of DNR TEP representatives : www.bwsr.state.nm.us /wetlands /wca/DNR TEP_contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E. Hwy. 2 Div. Ecol. Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids, MN 1200 Warner Road New Ulm, MN 56073 Bemidji, MN 56601 55744 St. Paul, MN 55106 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http: / /files.dnr.state.nm.us /aboutdnr /dnr re ig ons.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.pLvp.usace.qrmy.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP -R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101 -1678 For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: ® Location Map and Delineation El BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Page 3 of 3 I L 3 MM meffillu F To: Kendra Lindahl �7) From Loren Kohnen, Zoning Administrator Dates July 31, 2015Y . Re. Preliminary Plat T Strehler Estated Strehler Rd. City of Corcoran From the Fire Marshall side. The shared driveway and driveway to Lot 4 must be designed to accommodate two way traffic and the weight of heavy trucks. The design of the driveway should be required by the City Engineer. Engineer's Memo To: Kendra Lindahl, City Planner From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Date: August 4, 2015 Subject: Strehler Estates Preliminary Plat V ^AV WENCK Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. Strehler Road A Strehler road is a minor collector, and precedence is to dedicate 40 feet of ROW during platting. Driveway Sheet C -10 A Submit a soils report with geotechnical engineer recommendations for shared driveway construction to meet the 7 -ton standard as shown on Sheet STR -3. A Minimum of three borings with borings at STA 1 +00, 11 +00 and one selected by developer's engineer Sheet C -3 and others A Plans should show 12 -inch minimum culvert for each driveway. Stormwater Sheet C -8 A Pond on Lot 1, Block 1 needs EOF to discharge to the south, instead of directing overflow to the neighbor to the west. Sheet C -7 A Pond on Lot 4, Block 1 shall be moved to the north adjacent to (and discharge north to) the wetland and offsite to the large wetland complex off site to the north. This will require additional ditch length but a more northerly location appears to minimize neighbor impacts. Sheet C -4 A Show cleanout on profile. Sheet C -9 A Install 1 foot depth of sand, minimum 3 feet wide, around the tile in all ditch sections to promote drainage which also functions as a stormwater filtration BMP. End of Memo Wenck Associates, Inc. 1 1800 Pioneer Creek Center I P.O. Box 249 1 Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0249 Toll Free 800 - 472 -2232 Main 763 - 479 -4200 Email wenckmp @wenck.com Web wenck.com PROJECT LOCATION THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER EXCEPT THE WEST 659.91 FEET THEREOF, THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST T! QUARTER, ALL IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. LQU SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL Hanover Or Yj r 1 �{ a1n 119th Ave rd 117" oenfi e l 17 ..e * �± pip, 0 Ruischville Lorettc 1094h Ave N .�J STREHLER ROAD PROJECT LOCATION 14'7tlh Ave N - s L 1 Corcoran -x rA -N%. way , ME ion La rk-1 n R rl HAwckamcww Rd CLIENT: ccs Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber @yahoo.com w U J �I w w a Q X (� N F- Uj co W i N o N U Q ,C I 00 J U Uj C V ° °p T! (n C0 N m LQU Cc Le 005 Y W O �Q0 Ln o W O Cc M °i Q, W OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: X a v ftj cc w Ljj = LL .2 � o 0 W�� Nv a SITE GRADING PLAN co LLJ CL C ~ tx C8 c C9 -10 DETAILS .= co C11 w U J �I w w a Q X (� N F- Uj co W i N o N U Q ,C I 00 J U J U co ° °p T! (n C0 N m LQU Q ° Y W O �Q0 Ln o U O Ln °i Q, INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: X a o QW w C1 �0 U� ti C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN co LLJ CL C avi C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Title Sheet °O � �V) O .v w a 03 O > O ° m C) L a� W N OL W 3 w CL w U J �I w w a Q X (� N F- Uj co W i N o N U Q ,C I J U J U co ° °p m m LQU Q � Y W O O U O FILE NO. 00526 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN co C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Title Sheet LA RO LIMITS OF FIELD TOPO EXISTIN ,Q. ®SIGyFI A T- TIfE CANOP DELINEATED WETLXC D TOPOGRAPHY FROM LIDAR SURVEY Mllavi '11b1" SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 SEPTIC ANALYSIS SEPTIC ANALYSIS PROVIDED BY: RUSTY OLSON'S -- SOIL AND PERCOLATION TESTING 11481 RIVER VIEW ROAD NE HANOVER, MN 55431 WETLAND DELINEATION WETLAND DELINEATION INFORMATION PROVIDED BY. ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MINNESOTA, LLC 13605 1ST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 0 200 400 600 r GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ' ' ' ij' ' I l " \\ / \' '� ` I PROPERTY I.D. NO. /1 I �/ r 25' WETLAND / R �6/100) �-- ,�' BUFFER (TYP.) E TI �\ 17- 119 -23 -32 -0004 ZONING DELINEATE WETLAND //� PRO S� �' HOUSE (TY ■ ,� o RR RURAL RESIDENTIAL N J l 1004 w PARCEL AREA o ( DELINEATED WETL D q ~ - IGO . n ry, � _ 1012_ Z \LOOT 4, _3LO�K� J - Qo. �� 80.06 ACRES GROSS TO STREHLER RD CL ,909 ' 14 , W _ �l O 8" Al 15 9.1 A C . ° g 79.56 ACRES NEW TO R.O.W. 1 P 04 \ o BUFFER TRIP PROPOSED LOTS e i h MONUMENT A 10� SIGN _ (TYP. / ' P OPOSED s / ,� a / LOT 1, BLOCK 1 9.09 ACRES �IVEWAY (TYP! �= ` (c) / LOT 2, BLOCK 1 5.50 ACRES \ �� EXIS ING SIGNIFICANT LOT 3, BLOCK 1 5.78 ACRES PROPOSED STORMWATER �� / � `� I � � �1 %• TREE CANOPY PER _ DE NE`ATE WETLAND BASIN III I� EDASEMENT I I I'�l I I - \ AERIAL PHOTO ^ N _ 1, LOT 4, BLOCK 1 59.19 ACRES o 0 z 1 QP00' S e I 3 / ,019 L: r - � v /'Oj. z , PROPOSED STORMWATER BASIN 1 SHARED AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY OWNED • AND MAINTAINED BY LOTS 1 -4 J S 0 ca t - 60.00 EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY LL_ _ — _ °- S T R E H L E R ROAD — � oa cya'� EXISTING EXISTING -- / DRIVEWAY DRIV WAY ACCESS FOR ACCESS FOR EXISTING ADJACENT HOUSE PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY FRO LIDAR SURVEY �l REAR LOTLINE FRONT YARD 50 FT SIDE R/W SETBACK SIDE INTERNAL 10 FT REAR YARD 25 FT J Q W co 00 0 o W NV a m FRONT LOTLINE I LOT DETAIL SETBACK FRONT YARD 50 FT SIDE R/W 25 FT SIDE INTERNAL 10 FT REAR YARD 25 FT Drainage and utility easements are shown thus: Being 10.00 feet in width; unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining lot lines, and 10.00 feet in width, unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining right –of –way lines as shown on the plat: CLIENT: CCS Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber@yahoo.com VJ C V � m m lic •X O W cc W J cc O o: is N lam — m tx ca C co 13 a co ~ O � � J C) a • J Q J co 00 � o W NV a m W J U J �I L w a Q X (� N F- co W i N O U I co C) J J co ° m m IZ � IQ- � W����Lni o Q � w �`n� °i Q) Z ti W X a moon -, W O W ' 0 FILE NO. 00526 INDEX 0 I .o LLJ CL Ln C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT (� o C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES , a C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN ) `/ O C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN ,U w v + v� 00 O >- EROSION CONTROL PLAN � m C9 -10 DETAILS L a� W C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN a Preliminary Plat OL w CL W J U J �I L w a Q X (� N F- co W i N O U I LO C) J J co ° m m m � a Q � w O O U O FILE NO. 00526 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Preliminary Plat H O U S E PAD CLIENT: co 0 60'X80' CCS EXISTING SIN LE / I 1 l \ Partnership, LP FAMILY HOY o \ 19000 Highway 55 will I \ - °�' I I Plymouth, MN 55446 1 Craig Scherber I \ o (612) 810 -8400 ° 6" PRECAST HEADWALL / ,/ ( :p I / �� cescherber @yahoo.com I o° 0� I CHECK DAM I I" 1 I 6 HDPE v X02 _ EXISTING SEWER MOUND I LOT LINE (TYP.) � }+ LU J ;� ,5`° O �cb F M / / / TO REMAIN - % I I 0 30 60 90 °� Ui C � _ 101 - _ CHECK DAM 19 —\ — CONNECT EXISTING a X023 pz� - _ ,�- -1025. - --� 1 � � � cc a o � im o,�- + 1020 ��3�' .� � --- _- X022 CHECK DAM oti�� % DRIVEWAY TO PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVE l - , 026 ��� 1027 __ — 1 \ I I GRAPHICSC,4LEINFEET Q �y p W* a o a o� — — — 1z" 6F� LVERT ` i ' 1o2s � Z C +'00 0 0 / Ui — CY)—,- �- I co \ Jo� —! 0 - A O / _ _ / l / c7 + c) C) O o _ O 2 *00 �� 1022 N — as —aa as —aa 1023 —aa_aa + ° \ \ 1023 -- ._ —' � � O O o� _ _ — —_ —__ _ � ,z �� +oo �0 4 +00 - '�O�'— - - + — - - C�+-A — — — — 31 — �' — +0 — _ — _ _ — - -5+00— _ N O W m N F- w - _ -- _ - 1028, 0 menu cc m ^ / I, I. , — u , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , m \ / \ EXISTING GRAVEL V I N M _ DRIVEWAY 1 \ \ \ s_ I 1 —, w Ln o d I% 1021 �1 022 BEGIN DRA10TILE AT STA. 3 +00 I �� I o � �.o a w � o �., I o '02 INSTALL CLNOUT \ Z w'° X 9) U ILLJ —LLJ Q (,' LO PRIVATE DRIVE (STATION 0+00 8+00) a'2 'R �� 0 r � � ,U ca ,tea o o w w N� Q in w w 1040 w Q 1035 c NO 200.00' V ° Q U Nco 0? N 0? � C ; III w HIGH PT STA = +48.05 ° o+ o � N HIGH T ELEV = 1026.06 � N ' A w PVI STA = 5+ 8.93 0- 0- UU PVIELEV= 106.75 coW EXISTING GROUND > > A.D. = -2.75 % > > PROFILE 00 °° AD2 =2.7 w w w 1 25 FINISHED GROUND � o Q - w `- 50% - -- F S Lo 1920 - -- - -- -- -���— - -- ' 'w _ 20 — _ — — — �- -- _ - - -��— IN .= 1022.74 INV.= 023.12' DITCH PROFILE o - 2 LF - 2" CMP @ 1.46% LO U) (0 o CHECK DAM (YP.) " HDPE DRAINTI E v v 1015 DAYLIGHT DRAT TILE o m m STA. 0+25, 19. LT m 0 o INV. =1017. 0' w 0 0 0 1010 FILE NO. 00526 1005 L(7 O N O M O I­ � ti LO Lo M M CO O M r-- 00 N oo LO (D CO M O 00 O 't M 00 i` N O co M M r O N 00 N co O CO O M O O O r-- O ti 00 O M O M O N O O O V) 00 00 Lo (O CO � O (y O 00 M ti � N O O Lo M i` N't 00 M d7 U M 0i -� Oj M -� M O N C� O N N O O N N p O N N r O N N r N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N M N N N M M"i N N M"i N N N co N LO co N N Ln N M N Ln N co N U) N N (O � N N CO It N N CO N � N M N � N Ln N N LO "t N N Lf) M"i N N co N N N N N N N N CO N N N M N o o O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O O V LU V L.I.. 'ten V LJi `ten 7- V L.I.. /ten V v w /— T V L.I.. /— V_ V L.I.. /— V_ V L.I.. '�^ V_ V L.I.. /— T V L.I.. '�^ � V L.I.. `— / V L.I.. 'ten V_ V L.I.. /�� V L.I.. /�� V L.I.. 'ten V L.I.. '— � j V L.I.. /— V L.I.. /— V_ V L.I.. / '�^ V L.I.. / '�^ V L.I.. /�� / V L.I.. 'ten V L.I.. 'ten / V L.I.. (11D /�� V L.I.. T /— V L.I.. V_ /�� V L.I.. /ten v w /�� V L.I.. 'ten "1 V L.I.. /�� V L.I.. "1 /— V L.I.. 'ten �j V L.I.. T 0 1(1D LL 10 I 10 I 1(D I 10 I 10 I 1(D I 1(D I 1(D I 1(D I 1(D I 1(D I 10 I 1�11 LL 1(D I 10 I 1(D I 1(3 I 1(D I 1(D I 1(D I 10 I I..L 1(D 10 10 1(1� 10 1(1D 1(D 1(D LL 0 +00 0 +50 1 +00 1 +50 2 +00 2 +50 3 +00 3 +50 4 +00 4 +50 5 +00 5 +50 6 +00 6 +50 7 +00 7 +50 8 +00 Plan & Profile HOUSE PAD 60'X80' 1 \ \ a, o� N 0 A ftft \ 0 co ° 1024 FUTURE DRIVEWAY (TYP.) 21 12.00' ' 10 PRIVATE GRAVEL I �, � \ \ \ �� \ o \ o FUTURE/ N DRIVEWAY (TYP.) ° � \ joie —ro. 12.00' � \ DRIVE '0''0 poi 1023 1022 1021 1020 1019 6 vc - — — - - — -8+00 °` 9 +00 w LU — 1 fl. - 0® �e 1 + - - _ . . 1 00 + + - - ��o? w I N �o ?o 1,018 _ p -1025- . . , , , , \ i 26 7 \ � \ N N ° 27 0 LOT LINE w / y 0 _ 30 60 90 i' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET o � \ C� \� 7 I � / I I � � joie_ -� N 0 O C7 ap ^ \ �J 0 O O O / p PRIVATE DRIVE (STATION 8 +00 12 +54) EXI TING G OUND P OFILE 1 1040 1035 ■ F1y�l 7+50 11 8 +50 9 +00 9 +50 10 +00 10 +50 11 +00 11 +50 12 +00 J �i1i FUTURE DRIVEWAY (TYP.) o vv� I1p�4 o CLIENT: CCs Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber @yahoo.com ftft O w co ° m PROFILE W 00 m o LL O m OO o cc w Q .y ° o CL Lr) -1.25 to w 0 I CO Q �O W mz o X aW C t � J F- WEE i J cd p ooa Q+ o = LL � a) � °C Q — -- -- — — — — _ — w � a: m 1020 Q - DITCH PROFILE c c Q1 .0 c a 00 ca ,tea o o w U 4 w O cr M 1015 W w CL 1010 1005 N M O LO O r` N 00 o r` r- L o0 Lo LO ti co N 0) O � O O N O N M 00 O 0 O O L co O 00 N ti O � 00 r` 't ti 't o (c UK N cq N N N N N N co N N N N m N N CO M N N N N N N N N O N N N r O N N r O N N r M — N O M N O O N 07 O — N O 00 N 00 0- = Q7 00 — Cn — 00 = 00 — 00 Mc 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o O 0 - 0 o 0 o 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 cm O (7 W (D W 0 W (D (D W (D W (D W 0 W 0 W 0 W (D W (D W (7 W (D W (D LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U- 7+50 11 8 +50 9 +00 9 +50 10 +00 10 +50 11 +00 11 +50 12 +00 J �i1i FUTURE DRIVEWAY (TYP.) o vv� I1p�4 o CLIENT: CCs Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber @yahoo.com w J U c L w a Q X N w co o 'IN N �I LO ftft O w co ° m m W 00 m o LL O m OO o cc w Q .y ° o CL Lr) w 0 I CO Q �O W mz o X aW C t � J F- WEE i J cd p ooa Q+ o = LL � a) � °C Q W � av w � a: m Q - co c c Q1 .0 c a 00 w J U c L w a Q X N w co o 'IN N �I LO O ° m m 00 o U O OO w O O O In HOC, N0 C-. a w 0 I �O �I X aW W i o� U� Q1 .0 c 00 ca ,tea o o w U 4 w O cr M cn W w CL w J U c L w a Q X N w co o 'IN N �I LO o ° m m 00 o U Q w O O O U FILE NO. 00526 C3 Plan & Profile CLIENT: �� --- -� \ // \ \ \ \ \` CCS Partnership, LP \ \ PROPOSED 1 STORMWATER 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 / \ Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber@yahoo.com D\A\YLIGHT DRAINTILE TO TORMWATER BASIN 0 / 30 60 90 Nona \ G 1 (-, SCALE IN FEET waft I.r I.r C 17 10 10,E 82 \ \/ ` \ , °� ° - \ \ � � .� W LL / \ I \ � � o Q) � 10 0 OC 1 g ) o�� co a 10 PROPERTY LINE °.,a ,10 16.93 3, \ / \ / W 4" m z �S 1005 1007 - - - - -1009 - —ice 1010 — 101 -- 1012 .- - - - - -1013 - -� - - —` 1014 / 1015 - � ^ 101 ? Sg ` � \ / ■� ++ C Q G -- \ -�- -os— - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - / - o �� s ` `Jkoo \�/ \ 1 \ W �� J 10 p v a W \ 000 I h 101 6 �5 0 \ \ I \ \ \ X023 � W � 0 � N J Q \I \ � 1.0 CHECK DAM I I 2.0 CHECK DAM ,� � \ '�' �o \ � �, I _ � � m V) \ \\ I � I STA.� 4 +75 / I I I STA. 2 +25 / ,'`° / BEGIN DRAINTILE AT, 1 +4� \ 1 01? >> \\ \ � \ _ _ _ — C to soft \ \ \ � i � INSTALL � CLEANOUT- 1017 \ °\ \ \ co 6 HDPE DRAINTILE / \ 1 �018 _ - -\ o \ -� - 1 � 019.02 � -1019 \ j ► / / / , -1020- c U� � N � � c:1 \ \� c y .� q 112 o � :U M0 CL w U 1 N � O �_ �_ SWALE � 0 0 0 N E •U m 1030 1030 U O � Q Q N ai , w 1025 1025 w J U 11 1020 1020 0 EXISTING' GROUNDw PROFILE 1015 CHECK DAM (TYP.) 1015 � LU Q x 1010 FINISHED GROUND o 2 34% 1010 O � (� N J w LU `I N � o N O -- 0 — — — — — — — — — O I — — 1005 1000 1005 _ -- -- 6" DPE DRAINTILE LO co v cf) v p CHECK DA (TYP.) o m 1000 1000 m ° m a U Q w O O O U 995 995 FILE NO. 00526 990 990 O cx0 0) O Oi M rn 0) LO It 00 N 0) O N 't CO cc 0) In N It 00 U) It N Ln co 00 o d 1- O O O 00 LO M ti c0 U� Il- 00 CO 0) N M O LO Lo M O ti 00 (0 c0 N ti LO 00 Lo co � M N O O N O CO M O d C'P ! O M O O � O Lc� O O LO O O Lo O co O L{j O to O L j I-- O O Lo O I- O � O I-- O CO I� O O f` 00 O O 00 O M O 00 M O O M O 0j cV O p v' �- p �t �- �- C6 C' j c'i C� � d �vj �t �- C' j Lri r co — L6 I� �- L6 � C4 0 � O o � O O r O O � O O � O O � O O � o O � O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O � O 0 0 O O 0 0 O � 0 O O 0 � O 0 0 O � O 0 r 0 0 � 0 O O o � O O O W C� (D W /� V � W /rte � V w /� V W 0 W C D ui CD W /� V � w /� V � w /� � V W /� i� V Uj /� V Uj o w /� V W CD w /� V W 0 W CD W /� i� V W /� V � w /� V W 0 W /� V W CD w /� V 5 +50 5 +00 4 +50 4 +00 3 +50 3 +00 2 +50 2 +00 1 +50 1 +00 0 +50 0 +00 6 +09+00 Plan & Profile �J .n O O 10' D &U ''EASEM 1018 E-XiSTING FIELD EDGE I ' I II I I WJdH LINE � §!iEFT �E C5�2 l � 00 I 0 C-4 1 1 I o I I I \ m- + 1 1 \ \ LL. O O - L T2 a ° °° 1 \ O J \ I \ I I w II II II I I tiK w �- �w0L \ 1 I A. �o I I I ` \ 5 50 C I �^ 0 / \ SB -2 QT 2) \ 1026- / PT: 6+9J.8 SB- T 2) \ \ \ I— SB -4 f 5 LOT 2) \ r Ia SB- (LOT 2) 1024 A �RC - - \ - - -� EXISTING SEPTIC \ I ° MODUD I 9 _ o "° \ i t I "° \ \ z I / °.� I -I EXISTING VELL \ 1 CP ISB -2 (LO ) \ / P RC 4 I I �- 1 S 3 (LOT 1)II I I \ / I \ �- 1023 SB -1 LO 1 ENT � I � LOT 1 I 9.09 AC. \II ERVSTI G --I O�FE\ I \ EXISTING FIELD EDGE I I 707 \ \ I Y I 6 1 � � IIO� I�I I I I 'o I I �I � \ DoT: + 6� I y\l I\ I I ptl� i / I C. to f + 1� S o -b I — °' o \ STORMWATER i II I � 1� -- — 1028 : I I : J 1024 -- L 1024 : : I / \_ oNN :I " N - J - j o >> >g �g S � \ BASIN I �p� 1009 1010 S� \. �• \ S _ I O 1011 \ fi Imo, 1013 1012 PC: 0+61114 �/ I ��014 1015 ^� \y 1014 1015 -- °�� - -- - -- - -- - -- - 1017 —� 5 16 1� — • —. - •- 1017 /101 X10 10 — — 1018.10 — — 10 . . - - - - - -- - - - - -- -------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- - - - - -- 102 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q A . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - - . -. 1015 .- ..... 101 1 4 . ..... — �0 ��o \ 0 50 900 950 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET .. STREHLER ROAD .... 1018 - INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN \ C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES O C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN OCA 7071 O �� C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN p> C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 7070 '018 C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN CLIENT: CCs Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber @yahoo.com ftft to cow1 �i•r W m m .1 Q O W c cc ?�� m W E E J cc O LL W iwww� 1b � �m CO c co W U' w co N 44 13 Q0 L W I o w cn � Ln c: o q I m m° o"9 => _ oU I w� v �0 U o I 00 o ca 0 cr- O LU CL w J Q c w w a X N H LU V7 fv �I O LO v7 c� z Q Z a � O Y ti a� °a = 0 v cc O 01 No C) co N 44 13 Q0 L W I o w cn � Ln c: o q I m m° o"9 => _ oU I w� v �0 U o I 00 o ca 0 cr- O LU CL w J Q c w w a X N H LU V7 fv �I O LO v7 c� 00 O Y ti � w = Q O O O U FILE NO. 00526 C5.1 Plan - South \--\� Doti l i pp2 , o/ l l I I MAT 109.f�fi' LINE -SEE SHEET C5.3 1 to 0 � 1 � I / 1003 INJI . � I O 0- I �I I J I � I I I "Z' EDGE OF EXISTING FIELD i" ,1004 — 06j �10 8/ 1� / 012 /1 1 O O� i 8 r s o°� rti. CR �°0 s\ V V I I IN cn I � �c 1004 / I I L 6 4— r' 9.19 AC. � I1 FUTURE DRIVEWAY ,moo o \ ° / LOT 3 5.78 AC. I ' I I I Y I I I" I I I / / 1p1 / J \� 7074 , I I I ftft I co I co�1 I �i•r W m m 00 01 '1 � 0 0 'v o to 40 14 I O O I� �N i - 1015 -1016 0 50 900 950 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET /2 1018 U EASEMENT (1 1r.)/ SWALE _ \ I 1017 O o> 1018 / �1014 -10 7 w �OD 1019 — —, -1020- 'o , .� + I I 1079 \ �� - 1021— \ 1020 0 a \� �o � I —,022- � 2, �\ 1, ft T 3)x I--,' 1p22 \ I FUTURE DRIVEWAY \ .0 I \ \ \ I I ^ SBA O (LOT 3) / / / O�� �\ � �I \ o o ►o 11 / I \ \ I � \ H \ 1 SB -3 1(LOT ) / .. p I \ \ / T o \ \ \ W / / S 5(LO 3) �NN� \ w / \ / / <°°° a i i II I w ll �, \ \ — SB (LO} , I I I I II 2 1024 - r 1025 l,F I , ! .......... ............. ....... ..... LOT 2 ........ ..... ... ........... � o2E 0 5.50 AC . INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS. CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN I I co I l I 1 1 / N o C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT LO ° C2 -4 PLAN &PROFILES �I� ? C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN \ �s C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN I I II I I I I I 1 I I – 6 ! o --- - - - - �- -- C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN M T CH LINEt �SEE SHEET 5 - - - - - -- C9 -1 0 DETAILS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN CLIENT: CCs Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber @yahoo.com w U c �I W w � a Q N fv �I LO ftft co co�1 �i•r W m m 00 ~ '1 � 0 0 'v o to 40 O O O I� �N FILE NO. 00526 CO W m z (L 13 Ln W E Ln J cc 0. MN cb a a cc W LL � � av a: m m o�� U C C co � w U c �I W w � a Q N fv �I LO co m m 00 a Q � w O O O I� �N FILE NO. 00526 44 13 Ln Ln X� aW W o�� U � � LO I� �0 .v 00 m ,a3 o LU U 4 w O cr- LU CL w U c �I W w � a Q N fv �I LO o m m 00 a Q � w O O O U FILE NO. 00526 C5.2 Grading Plan - Mid 1000 WETLAND MONUMENTATION SIGNAGE (TYP.) 998--,- 10 0 0 --� I 12 I � ER iTyP 1 SB- I � I 40 00 / I I CD -JBT 4) \ / Lj OT j SB -1 (LO `4) / \ SB -5 T 4) � \ / \ \ 4 \SB -2 (LOT 4) / I / 0) HOUSE PAD �B I co 100,E I o o° GFE75 1008.0 I \ I / I LOE = 1008.0' f\ o LFE = 999.0' I 1003 LOT 4 I � e OS \ \ I I 59.19 AC. �h 0' D &U EASEMENT (TYP.) / I I / I I I \ /7 10 \ ' °0 ' A OOD I \1 I � v I 1 II / I II / I Q MATCH LINE - SEE S4ET C5.2 I / II I FUTURE DRIVEWAY (TYP.) \ I / I \ � 111 II \ I 12' (TYP.) � � \I I II� 0 I o \ II o �� Il I C I I I o �I III III 1 r I 'COD, I ' I I I � i 1p09 i 110 111 / i 1p12 / / 101 16 0 50 900 950 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN CLIENT: CCS Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber @yahoo.com w U c n W w a Q X N LU LU fv �I O LO ftft to I I O r U co �i•r m m Uj�1 m o -t Y i 00 Q 39. O OO FILE NO. 00526 O Q� In 2 O CID� a= W mz Ln UjEE aW ob �- a ? oz o J cd O Q = W LL � av Q) a: 1b ones 10 CO CID c w U c n W w a Q X N LU LU fv �I O LO U I I O r U U ° m m m o -t Y i 00 O O O OO FILE NO. 00526 In 2 O Ln aW W \ U� a � c , °V ° Q1 .0 00 w O M ,a3 o U 4 w O U q w ;w CL w U c n W w a Q X N LU LU fv �I O LO U o r U U ° m m m o Y U, O O O U FILE NO. 00526 C503 Grading Plan - North INSTALL TRM (SEE SHEET C8) POND OVERFLOW ELEV= 1014.50' 'o �R > 1015 ` so �O•V� 4AP tK a FES -201 (24 ") ✓� INV= 1012.50' I I i I I I I I Qi 0 0 ID F \ do \ o ` \ \ 0 30 60 90 \ \ \ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET \ o \ zoov 701,0 701, STORMWATER BASIN NWL = 1002.60' H WL = 1003.12 ` \ 1009 7074 'o're \ \ \ 1010 \ Are \ \ 1011 \ \ \ FES -200 (24 ") \\ INV= 1008.6' \ 1012 \ \ OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 2 \ \ ' 1013 ` \ 1014 1 \ 1015 / 1014 1015 105 101 . S TREHL ER ROAD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ - - - - - - - - - INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: \ CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN - - - 707¢ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---1015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1016 - - - - - - - - - - - '07,> - - - - - - C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT \ C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN CLIENT: CCS Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber@yahoo.com W J Q J �I W W J v Q X (� N F- co i N W Q � U Q ,C z� LO co J co NOW ° °p m Uj m z Q � Y W O O U Q 1 •� 13 o CL ai a to L Q W Q ,o d ° Ln Q> ti W• 0 X N QW �� 00 J = Q 10 oo �Q 0 W LL ; a°� NV � CC � W I 0 O O p � m O O CL ca C Q soft co W J Q J �I W W J v Q X (� N F- co i N W Q � U Q ,C z� LO co J J co ° °p m m Q � Y W O O U O �N FILE NO. 00526 n 01 Q ,o d ° Ln Q> ti W 0 X N QW W o0 U� U '' j .O W I 0 O O p Ln O CL a ) } ° N E V _ CC) w � crj O ?- s o Lu N W CZ Q) 4 ° CL W J Q J �I W W J v Q X (� N F- co i N W Q � U Q ,C z� LO C) J J co ° °p m m Q � Y W O O U O FILE NO. 00526 C6 Grading Plan / / I 24 LF — 18" RCP @ 1.5% I 1 I FES -101 (18 ") J INV= 1001.64' 0 0 I POND OVERFLOW INSTALL TIM (SEE SHEET C,8) I J 1 I O� O I 1 I I II I\ / I u I I I I �I N I i I I I I I I O -- - - - - - - OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 1 1003 1004 I 1004 1003 L —J1 I I I I �I 4:1- I g Ir � 10:1 I Ig I� i $I 8� 8 4:1 4:1 -Fi co O � W M z C7 2 IN O 8 I � O r $ � o I 4.1 0 IZ L- 1 g o w m n 0 I 81 I 28 LF — 18" RCP @ 0.0% I FES —/00 (18 ") INV= 998.0' I STORMWATER BASIN N WL = 1002.0' \ H WL = 1003.93' \ I 6' PRECAST HEADWALL I V= 1002.0' I I � I I T:6 +05.02 co 0 I� PCC:5+ 6 I / O � I I QU I I \ 6,00 \ `I 11 I i \ 20 40 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I I 1 1 CLIENT: CCS Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber@yahoo.com Cc J J obe 4" °p m W c v 00 w O O U Q •� O FILE NO. 00526 Cc ai a U Q Q o`O W \ m Z CL Cc %� sum ` z � 0 W afta QW o J = p °ov �Cc W LL "Mm ; a� NV � c� �m is o Ln °z I� �C ca c ._ co Z w ° ° V) \ ,U 00 L w v� O > o w OL W ° CL INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: r CO PROJECT LOCATION PLA C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT loos C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN / C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS / C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN CLIENT: CCS Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber@yahoo.com W U J �I w w Q X (� N F- a.) w co w i N Q N U Q ,C I LO Cc J J obe 4" °p m W c v z w O O U Q •� O FILE NO. 00526 Cc ai a U Q Q 0�OLi o W m Z CL Cc %� sum ` z � 0 W afta QW o J = p °ov �Cc W LL "Mm ; a� NV � c� �m is o Ln °z I� �C ca c ._ co Z W U J �I w w Q X (� N F- a.) w co w i N Q N U Q ,C I LO Cc J J co ° °p m m w O O U O FILE NO. 00526 0�OLi o a, o � � z � � W q i o X a) m o QW o�•> �� W o0 U o Ln I� �C c a Z w ° ° V) ,U 00 w v� O > o w OL W ° CL W U J �I w w Q X (� N F- a.) w co w i N Q N U Q ,C I LO c� J J co ° °p m m w O O U O FILE NO. 00526 C7 Grading Plan o� ,moo o° 1 �1004 �oe ,�°` 1 o IJ��R 12 CY CLASS III R> RAP WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC I I I I 32 SY MNDOT CAT 2 TRM (MNDOT PEC 3885) I I o� STORMWATER BASIN o 0 � I I � I 'I ✓ 1014 I I L/1015 /1018 1010 - \ SILT FENCE I 1020 \ �� 6 \ o '- --1026 Ir / ' I ► � I I \ �� �� I io (1"--l-1028 I \ I I \ °30 I �' �/ ` -1028 (qi SIN I o \ I— _j ON \ ( I SILT FENCE CE • I � l AP r CONRTR Ic _ o r :::.. — had n .................. .... .. ............................... l .......................... ,.. .........:.......:_.. ..........-,.... 1020 . .................... ............................... ...................... ......... ................... o :..... TKt+;ri ire, —ROAD 1018 1 STORMWATER BA 20 SY MNDOT CAT 2 T (MNDOT SPEC 388 SILT FEN 1 12 CY CLASS III RIP R WITH GEOTEXTILE FAB 101 UCTION ENTRANCE SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHUN LAND SERVICES 708 1ST AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: JUNE, 2015 PROJECT LOCATION HENNEPIN COUNTY PID #17- 119 -23 -32 -0004 THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER EXCEPT THE WEST 659.91 FEET THEREOF, THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, ALL IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF SITE CLEARING, GRADING, UTILITES AND RURAL BITUMINOUS ROAD SECTION WITH DITCHES. SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY OFF —SITE AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OILS, GASOLINE, PAINT, AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGES. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREA MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL MUST BE IN COMPLICANCE WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS. EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES IS NOT ALLOWED ON SITE. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. NO CONCRETE WASHOUTS ARE ALLOWED ON SITE. EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULE 1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED OR RESTORED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. SILT FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED AS SHOWN TO INTERCEPT RUNOFF. THE AREA LOCATED BEYOND THE PERIMETER SILT FENCE SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BEGINNING GRADING OPERATIONS. 3. ALL STORM SEWER INLETS (IF APPLICABLE) SHALL HAVE INLET PROTECTION INSTALLED PRIOR TO BEGINNING GRADING OPERATIONS. 4. ALL EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATIONS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL 70% COVERAGE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY FINAL TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 5. SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED ON SITE TO ALLOW FOR PLACEMENT OF A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE— VEGETATED. ALL EXCESS TOPSOIL IS TO BE EXPORTED OFF SITE AND DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE SITE GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION AND ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SO THAT THE GENERAL SITE CAN BE MULCHED AND SEEDED. AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING OPERATIONS. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. ALL DEVICES NECESSARY TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (IE. PERIMETER SILT FENCE, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, SWALES, PONDS, BERMS, ETC.) SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SOON AS ALLOWED BY THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING. 2. AFTER COMPLETION OF THE FINAL GRADING, EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE PERMANENTLY SEEDED & STABILIZED WITHIN 72 HOURS. STABILIZATION SHALL CONSIST OF DISC — ANCHORED SEED AND MULCH (TRM & EROSION CONTROL BLANKET) OR SOD. 3. THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL DRAINED CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES AND GRADING, OR OTHER MEANS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT PROPER DRAINAGE IS MAINTAINED. THIS WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. 4. ENTRANCE /EXITING OF THE SITE SHALL OCCUR ONLY AT THE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT & SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. ANY SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE 1. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED 2. BY THE CONTRACTOR'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE AND 0 100 200 300 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 3. MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR WEEKLY AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ANY RAIN EVENT LARGER THAN 0.5— INCHES UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A. SILT FENCE • 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. REMOVE SEDIMENT WITHIN 24 HOURS. B. FABRIC IS DAMAGED. FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BECOMES INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. • ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER SILT FENCE IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISITNG GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED WITH APPROPRIATE SEED MIX AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. • SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSES, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPWARD SLOPING AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. C. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE • REFRESH AS NECESSARY. • CLEAN SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ROADS /STREETS. D. INLET /OUTLET PROTECTION • REMOVE SEDIMENT AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. • CLEAN OR REPLACE FILTER WHEN CLOGGED. E. SURFACE WATER • DRAIN AND STABILIZE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY. F. STREET SWEEPING • REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ROADS IMMEDIATELY AFTER DISCOVERY. SEED AND MULCH SCHEDULE 1. POND SLOPES BETWEEN THE NWL & TOP BERM SHALL BE SEEDED WITH MnDOT SEED MIXTURE 310. THE TOP OF THE BERM AND OUTSIDE SLOPES SHALL BE SEEDED WITH MnDOT SEED MIXTURE 35 -221. 2. ALL REMAINING DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6" TOPSOIL. UNLESS AREAS ARE TO BE SODDED, MnDOT SEED MIX 260 SHALL BE APPUED AT 100 LBS /AC. MnDOT TYPE 3 MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 2 TONS /AC AND DISC ANCHORED IN AREAS NOT COVERED BY SOD OR EROSION BLANKET. SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST NPDES REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION SCHEDULE WITH REGARDS TO GRADING. 3. FERTILIZER SHALL BE A 20 -10 -20 AND APPLIED AT 350 LBS /AC. DISC FERTILIZER INTO TOP 3" OF SOIL. 4. DORMANT SEED MIX SHALL BE USED AFTER NOVEMBER 1 OR WHEN TEMPERATURES DO NOT EXCEED 40' F USING THE SAME RATES SPECIFIED ABOVE. NO SEED SHALL BE PLACED ON SNOW OR ICE GREATER THAN 2" IN DEPTH. 5. ANY SEEDED ARES THAT DO NOT BECOME ESTABLISHED WITH VEGETATION SHALL BE RE— SEEDED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6. REFER TO EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE FOR SEED AND MULCH SCHEDULE WITH REGARDS TO GRADING. 7. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR SEEDING AND SODDING LOCATIONS AND DETAILS. ADJUST /REDUCE EROSION BLANKET IN AREAS TO BE SODDED. QVERSTORY TREE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT ONE OVERSTORY TREE IS TO BE PROVIDED PER DEWELLING UNIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE SECTION 1060.070, Subd. 2 RUNOFF ROUTING OFF —SITE DOWNSTREAM WATER BODIES RECEMNG STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE: DRAINAGE DITCHES ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES CROW RIVER RESPONSIBLE PARTY CONTRACTOR CONTACT INFORMATION: TO BE DETEft4ftX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN CLIENT: ccs Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber@yahoo.com OWN co C V Uj m m COa�1 m W �c W TJ 10 LL i LL ftift LU 11D a: m ::ib left man m �Q C C co �43 a L�Q) 3 a Z °V) �� L o� O t� �c NV a J 0_ J cc z 0 _0 (7 Cr W I N� W C� z W , o X Q) X o mm W �o 6 I W 6- U � o I 00 m 0 w o Uj LO � J U J U C m � m a W w 0 0 0 FILE NO. 00526 • Erosion Control Plan w J w w � v Q U " (� N ti co o U N I 0 m 0 U s U GRAVEL DRIVE MNDOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET IN DITCH BOTTOM AND DITCH SLOPES O _ •:.� n- .- -T- DITCH BOTTOM FINISHED GRADE NOTE:INSTALL DRAINTILE WITH SAND & COMPOST MIXTURE AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SWALE AT CENTERLINE STATIONS: STA. 2 +25 STA. 4 +75 PRIVATE GRAVEL DRIVE STATIONS: VARIES r VARIES III =I VARIEs — — — — — — — — — — � =1 � 1- ANA -� — � — 11 -- DITCH BOTTOM FINISHED GRADE I III IIIIII - 6" CPEP DRAINTILE (PERFORATED) WASFiLU SANU & GUMF'U5 I MIX I UKL 50% WASHED SAND WITH LESS THAN 5% PASSING THE NO. 200 SEIVE 2.0' (PRIVATE DRIVE) 4.0' (SWALE) COMPACTED SOIL CHECK DAM CONSTRUCTED WITH NATIVE CLAY SOILS SEED WITH MNDOT SEED MIXTURE 310 MNDOT CAT. 6 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON CHECK DAM M all v PRIES CsEE , � �1 MNDOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET IN DITCH BOTTOM AND DITCH SLOPES (BEYOND CHECK DAM) TYPICAL CHECK DAM CROSS SECTION SCALE 1 "= 2' SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO A MINIMUM OF 1 -FOOT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF SAND /COMPOST MEDIA CL MNDOT CAT. 6 EROSION T -,fir r� 2h'I t 6" DIA. PIPE BEND `i G m = 10 -1/2" cn SIDE FRONT NO. 4E NO. 4E RODENT SHIELD 1D HORIZONTAL BAR VERTICAL BAR DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE TO ALLOW FOR D (2 REQUIRED ) BEND AND A SNUG FIT IN SLOT IN HEADWALL. 1.4" E DISCHARGE DRAIN PIPE 3/8" t TWO NO. 4E VERTICAL BARS RODENT SHIELD QI Li a I NO. 4E HORIZONTAL 1" * BAR (CENTERED) PLAN OPTIONAL HANDLING HOLES N0. 4E HORIZONTAL BAR 1J(•:: 2 3-0" • I- SECTION DIMENSIONS 4 DIA. PIPE 6" DIA. PIPE 8" DIA. PIPE A 6 -1/2" 8 -1/2" 10 -1/2" B 1.0.. V 2" 1-4" C 5" T" 9" D 1-0" V 2" 1.4" E 8 -1/2" 30 -1/2" 1'0 -1/2" F 9" il" 1'1" G 9 -1/2" 11 -1/2" 1'1 -112" H 5" T" 9 -1/2" I 11" 1' 1" J 6" 8" 10" APPRO %. WT. 210 LBS. 250 L85. 300 LBS. G EXACT DIMENSION DEPENDENT ON COUPLING METHOD. —I 2 -1/2" 1 . J . I I I H (DIAMETER OF HOLE FOR DRAIN PIPE) �I I TWO NO. 4E u VERTICAL BARS 1/2" FILLET - L — 3/4" CHAMFER 3 -1/2" C I (TYPICAL) D NO. 4E HORIZONTAL END VIEW BAR NOTES: ALL CONCRETE MATERIALS SHALL BE MN /DDT MIX DESIGNATION 3W46 AND /OR OTHER MIX AS APPROVED BY THE STATE MATERIALS ENGINEER. HEADWALLS SHALL NOT BE SHIPPED UNTIL CONCRETE HAS REACHED A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 5000 PSI. THE EPDXY BARS SHALL BE SECURELY RETAINED SO THEY ARE NOT DISPLACED DURING CONCRETE PLACEMENT. TIE WIRE SHALL BE EPDXY COATED. WELDING WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. THE FABRICATOR SHALL PROVIDE A QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM APPROVED BY THE MATERIALS ENGINEER. Q1 THE RODENT SHIELD SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM CARBON STEEL FLATTENED EXPANDED METAL, STYLE 1/2" NO. 4F. IT SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. ACTUAL SCREEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE SUCH AS WILL SNUGLY FIT THE PROVIDED SLOT (TAPERED IF NECESSARY ),WITH THE SCREEN LIP FITTING FLUSH WITH THE CASTING TOP AND THE BOTTOM FITTING TIGHT TO THE FLOW LINE. Q2 THE MANUFACTURER'S NAME AND DATE OF PRODUCTION (MONTH AND YEAR ) SHALL BE CLEARLY CAST NOT INK STAMPED ) INTO EITHER THE BOTTOM OF EACH HEADWALL OR NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE LARGE END IF A MANUFACTURER HAS MORE THAN ONE PLANT, THEY SHALL BE APPROPRIATELY CODED. APPROVED AUGUST 20, 2001 STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIFICATION STANDARD DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REFERENCE PLATE �� PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL 2502 NO. STATE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR SUBSURFACE DRAINS REVISED 3131C 3 -22 -2013 M.J.E. EDGE OF GRAVEL DITCH SLOPE VARIES — — — — — — — — — — 1 TI -r- TYPICAL PROFILE SECTION FOR CHECK DAMS & DRAINTILE SCALE 1 "= 2' V Pl I LI %-71 1 1 V I \f-%l Ili I I I-IL PER PLANS STA. 1 +00 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: STA. 2 +00 CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN STA. 3 +00 C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN CLIENT: ccs Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber @yahoo.com WAfte cooft 0 4W Uj C m m a�1 O W �•+ MOM aft m LU E Uft J 4 _O L 0 a: 0 :�o Ivft cr) o� _e .r C. O /O� OV NV J 0 w �oLn o C) OD 002 a e UJ o a m U 00 v 6, } m M w FILE NO, 00526 C9 DETAILS w J U 00 "I U W Q U " (� N LU J w Uj co w o �co 62 x- O � � z� 0 co m 0 U I U U U o m m Q W O O O FILE NO, 00526 C9 DETAILS w J U 00 "I U W Q U " (� N LU J w Uj co w o �co 62 x- O � � z� 0 co m 0 U I U CLIENT: CCs Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 SR CD Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber Go (612) 810 -8400 cescherber @yahoo.com WAIM cd LU C V Q P O �a Uj ` tT) (D CL LP Ll - W C tz J - Gann Ica W W J cd Q a = U. C 0) o cc W ; NV Li Uj �� co ti i� �CN °a W I -0 o �° ° o Z w O X o .� q m o n - ,o a"i m o a o a� o m v o W _i CL 1 DIA. X C LONQ (S.S) OM73 1 DIA. X 4' LONG. (S�.S_) BOL7S a� - W FASTEN W/IE:PDXY ANCHOR SYSTEM 571" OD STEEL PLA7E w/IE:PPOxY ANCHOR SYSTEM 57' OD Sim PLATE z ) ° (4 REQURM) 2' WIDE x 1/2' THICK (4 REQUIRED) 2' WIDE X 1/2' 7HICK CL w J U 1'X1'1 /4' Sim 1'X1'1 /4' STELL � � (PLATE W//5E/b)g' DIA. HOLE PuTE w[S/b' DIA. HOLE Q (4 R PLATE 710 BOTTOM 3 j' SMOOTH RMW STOCK (4 REQUIRED) 3 jr SMOOTH ROIAO STOCK o 4 O.C. EACH WAY WELD 4 O.C. EACH WAY RING TACK WELD BOTTOM ROW 70 RING TACK WELD BOTTOM ROW TO 1' STm PLATE TACK WELD TOP 1' STEEL PLATE TACK WELD TOP co ROW 70 BOTTOM ROW. ROW. ab j ELEV.- 1003.0' ELEV.- 1014.0' 48' 48' ELEV.- 10028' ELEV.- 1013.30' a NWL 1' 1' NWL I-*- c Q x ELEV.-1002.W ELEV.- 10128' o cq C, Lij w 18' RCP 24' RCP ' cq IN J 0 � � U 18' RCP • .- 100224' ELEY.- 1001.0' 4 5' 24 RCP ELEV.•10128' ELEV.- 1012�W' 4, o 4' CONCRETE BAFFLE WALL �`�� CONCRETE BAFFLE WALL ELEV -eeeo' a ELEV.-99&O' (MIN. 3" THICK) ELEV.- 1008.8' 9 ELEY- 1008.8' (MIN. 3" THICK) Q U U CONCRETE BAFFLE WALL WITH 4e' CONCRETE BAFFLE WALL WITH 48' m m SLOTTED WEIR OPENING CONCRETE BAFFLE WALL WITH SLOTTED WEIR OPENING CONCRETE BAFFLE WALL WITH z z Y (SEE DETAIL) SLOTTED WEIR OPENING (SEE DETAIL) SLOTTED WEIR OPENING O O O U POND OUTLET CONTROL POND OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OCS -1 STRUCTURE OCS -2 FILE NO, 00526 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN CIO C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN DETAILS a a a o � � B N o 10' I 10' CD 0.5' a � 1 o N L I L � O � o I 2% � E � •1 0 3: NPR \ES � _ � RIPRAP `� MPX MqX 3:1 MPX � � N 1.5" SPWEA240B WEAR COURSE PER N SEE CITY PLATE N0. STO -11 FOR RIPRAP PLACEMENT. E 4" CLASS 5 MN /DOT 2360 E E A A � � AGGREGATE SHLDR TACK COAT PER MN /DOT 2357 ID 0 1.5" SPNWB230B BASE COURSE PER o 0 o MN /DOT 2360 0 0 a 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE a a 00°00°0 SHARED PAVED DRIVEWAY MN /DOT 3138 ANCHOR CL o� o o� o� o 0 OO OO OO O 10.5' 10.5' 1 0 00000 3 4 B 3 X00000 � o000 o °o °o °o °o o �� i 6 MINIMUM DEPTH 00 00 00 O N .1 � 2% 3• NPR \ES o o )S o�000� �0 0� 0 � MPX � � RIPRAP REQUIREMENTS O O O O O MPX MqX 3;1 E E 12 TO 18 8 -10 CUBIC YARDS CL.3 PLAN o� 00 0� o0 0 �' ° ° 21 " TO 27" 12 -14 CUBIC YARDS CL.3 ° 00 00 00 O I 12" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE '= TIE LAST 3 PIPE JOINTS. � 30" TO 36" 16 -24 CUBIC YARDS CL.3 0 1" - 2" WASHED ROCK oOOoo° a o USE 2 TIE BOLT o 42' TO 48" 30 -38 CUBIC YARDS CL.3 ticj. o w10�N � SHARED AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY MN /DOT 3138 L � 54" AND UP 62 &UP CUBIC YARDS CL 4 (ONE CUBIC YARD IS APPROXIMATELY 2,800 LBS.) h, ° FASTENERS PER JOINT. ° TOPAOR BOTTOMF 0 M T 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM 2� " 7 5' 7 5' " PIPE. 2' -� RIPRAP I TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE � � � I � PROVIDE 3 ANCHOR CLIPS TO FASTEN � �� 0 o I o TRASH GUARD TO FLARED END SECTION. 0 2' � NOTE: � � 2% � N HOT DIP GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION. � MIN FABRIC FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD � N �' GRANULAR FILTER MATERIAL MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. � Mp,X MqX 3;1 TRASH GUARD SIZING J SECTION A -A (MN /DOT 3601.281) ENTRANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION ON � I a PIPE SIZE BARS H BOLTS a PUBLIC ROADWAYS. FUGITIVE ROCKS WILL BE REMOVED FROM `-' � � NOTE GEOTEXTILE FILTER -TYPE IV Z Z 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE Z ISOMETRIC 12" 3/4 "� 2 1/2" 5/8" Z FILTER BLANKET REQUIRED UNDER � ADJACENT ROADWAYS DAILY OR MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY. 15 3 4 0 3 5/8" � I � LONG AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY MN /DOT 3138 � 18" 3�4 "D 4" 5/8" I RIPRAP OR 2 LAYERS OF 500X MIRAFI RIPRAP Q a NOTES: ¢ �1 " -24" 1'cb 4" 3/4" ¢ FABRIC OR EQUAL 97"-36" 1� 5 3/4 � N J J 1 THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INCREASE THE DRIVEWAY SECTION BASED ON SOIL J 42" 1 "0 6" 3/4" J Q ¢ CONDITIONS FORA 7 -TON SECTION. � 48 " -54" 1 1 /4 "b 6" 1 " 0 0 0 » o 2. MINIMUM SLOPE = 0.5% 60 " -72 1 1/4"0 7 1 Q a 3. MAXIMUM SLOPE = 10 %. a 78 " -90" 1 1/4 "0 8" 1" Q GRANULAR FILTER MATERIAL Z 4. A SINGLE DRIVEWAY IS RECOMMENDED TO FOLLOW THIS DETAIL, BUT MAY NOT BE REQUIRED. Z Z SECTION B -B (MN /DOT 3601.281) N 5. REFER TO APPENDIX FOR LAYOUT DETAILS. � � GEOTEXTILE FILTER -TYPE IV CLIENT PROJECT STANDARD PLATES � CLIENT PROJECT STANDARD PLATES � CLIENT PROJECT STANDARD PLATES � CLIENT PROJECT STANDARD PLATES N ��� Wenck CITY OF CORCORAN � ��� Wenck CITY OF CORCORAN � ��� Wenck CITY OF CORCORAN � Wenck CITY OF CORCORAN _ SHEEP � SHEEP � SHEEP I o•��vo� -,�.. �=n- �.•. -�� '''' }� TITLE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE `�I o- �.���.��. �s�•"'^'" °"«^ M1 TITLE o FLARED END SECTION N � •� RIPRAP Q Cm.oltl0y �.mf I4UD PgNFFA CIiD( CFNIFR ]fll- 4)9 -{11» ', .. � ��� �� W%E %NM. W 53]50 ]&F,]i4142 _ -.. SHARED/LONG WPIE PWM, W SS.lS9 WAE %NM. W SS%A ]BF{]9 -,242 v G� . N ° o®"`�n� "�«'°+` ,mo c»� � i�im `"•ia,- .]c -aaco � .. _ TITLE o °* � y� �y�� 1800 ROIEEII CRfDf QMFR �]B1iA -N00 TITLE W Q - (ROCK) o - - _- DRIVEWAY AND TRASH GUARD o AT OUTLETS a REV DWN APP REV DATE DWN BY CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE PROJECT N0. SHEET NO. REV N0. � REV DWN APP REV DATE DWN BY CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE PROJECT N0. SHEEP NO. REV N0. � REV DWN APP REV DATE DWN BY CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE PROJECT N0. SHEET N0. REV N0. � REV DWN APP REV DATE DWN BY CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE PROJECT N0. SHEET NO. REV N0. DEC 2013 CVE SCALE 2294 -00 E RO - 6 � DEC 2013 CVE SCALE 2294 -00 STR - 3 � DEC 2013 CVE SCALE 2294 -00 STO -10 � DEC 2013 CVE SCALE 2294 -00 ST -1 1 LA RO I LIMITS OF EXI$TllyQ2 ®slGr T CANC DELINEATED WET�ND ■ 25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP.) 1-1-0. TOPOGRAPHY FROM LIDAR SURVEY SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 SEPTIC ANALYSIS SEPTIC ANALYSIS PROVIDED BY: RUSTY OLSON'S -- SOIL AND PERCOLATION TESTING 11481 RIVER VIEW ROAD NE HANOVER, MN 55431 WETLAND DELINEATION WETLAND DELINEATION INFORMATION PROVIDED BY. ANDERSON ENGINEERING OF MINNESOTA, LLC 13605 1ST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 DELINEATED WETLAND r IO1y_ 0 200 400 600 I r GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE CANOPY CLIENT: CCS Partnership, LP 19000 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Craig Scherber (612) 810 -8400 cescherber@yahoo.com /l �� 59.1@ A C ..-- , 14� �, �, o g� ,g 'or , i /? o � NOTE: NO EXISTING SIGNIFICANT cc �� BUFFER RIP TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED AS J % l MONUMENT, I SIGN (TYP ' PROPOSED s i ,�. a PART OF THE PROJECT. N �N ' I VEWAIY (TYP! P/ �= \ IN W I � o Ln T EXIS G SIGNIFICANT , PROPOSED STORMWATER / \ ` I , ��%• TREE CANOPY PER DE NEATEE WETLAND z w I o BASIN ' f D &U /11 AERIAL PHOTO _ ,�, o � q m o EASEMENT r - , I m -_.- J o W I OO \ v �I°°B 00 d o � v SWALE J l � ° Q ' , y o y o 0 I DELINEATED WE�C D �' `) 44EATE WETLAND v ' o SHARED AGGREGATE �`/a `• CL LU o CD Z .— 1 �0 ,ma PROPOSED STORMWATER BASIN co SHARED AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY OWNED • AND MAINTAINED I BY LOTS 1 -4 J S Q Q —60.00' EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY EXISTING EXISTING /- DRV�IN AY DRIV,�AY ACCESS FOR ACe'ESS FOR EXISTING ADJACENT HOUSE PROPERTY STREHLER ROAD — TOPOGRAPHY FRO LIDAR SURVEY INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2 -4 co•�.,� C5.1 -3 �.+ C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN W EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN m m � Q Q •y O a ` o co 0 W Z F- cc sum .aft hft +r C LU J Q 10 oo CC = W LL m a°� Z. vu a a a: is as W lam m Ili cc ca C co /l �� 59.1@ A C ..-- , 14� �, �, o g� ,g 'or , i /? o � NOTE: NO EXISTING SIGNIFICANT cc �� BUFFER RIP TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED AS J % l MONUMENT, I SIGN (TYP ' PROPOSED s i ,�. a PART OF THE PROJECT. N �N ' I VEWAIY (TYP! P/ �= \ IN W I � o Ln T EXIS G SIGNIFICANT , PROPOSED STORMWATER / \ ` I , ��%• TREE CANOPY PER DE NEATEE WETLAND z w I o BASIN ' f D &U /11 AERIAL PHOTO _ ,�, o � q m o EASEMENT r - , I m -_.- J o W I OO \ v �I°°B 00 d o � v SWALE J l � ° Q ' , y o y o 0 I DELINEATED WE�C D �' `) 44EATE WETLAND v ' o SHARED AGGREGATE �`/a `• CL LU o CD Z .— 1 �0 ,ma PROPOSED STORMWATER BASIN co SHARED AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY OWNED • AND MAINTAINED I BY LOTS 1 -4 J S Q Q —60.00' EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY EXISTING EXISTING /- DRV�IN AY DRIV,�AY ACCESS FOR ACe'ESS FOR EXISTING ADJACENT HOUSE PROPERTY STREHLER ROAD — TOPOGRAPHY FRO LIDAR SURVEY INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C2 -4 PLAN & PROFILES C5.1 -3 SITE GRADING PLAN C6 -7 DETAIL POND GRADING PLAN C8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C9 -10 DETAILS C11 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN w J U J �I w w Q X U (/� N ti 2 co W i N U Q ,C I LO co co C) J J co ° m m m � a Q � w O O U O FILE NO. 00526 C11 Tree Preservation Plan It {,vIxud 3!14J07 C AN Ynr tn4emat Ilse Only Project 9 Developr etit Name Type or Application 0 Comprehensive Plain Amendment Zoning /Subdivision Ordiitnnce Amendment 13 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) C! Vacation (Street /Easements) 13 Sketch fiat /Plan review (Reg.IOSP) 0 Filial Plat (Reg. /OSP) 0 PUD Preliminary Plan ❑ Administrative Permit ❑ Topography Exemption 13 Building Might Appeal Rezoning ❑ Variance: 0 Interim Use Permit ❑ site Plan F1'reliminary /Plat— Lase (Rog. /OSP) ❑ PUD Skelch Plan ❑ PUD Final Flan ❑ Lot Division ❑ Electronic Filing; Waiver Property Information Address 7wt Sr— -b I'117 NUrnbor 111 -1 19 23- 32 00 Legal Descri ption (attach if necessary) .5ee A7MftA?!0 Aliplicants Name:: Applicant Infornintion 9% CX Address; l g000 ss F �l Zw i n! c; 6 %Q4 zip Phone: (W) re ao 1 6400 Phone (H) Fax Print or Type Narnc: )✓mail Address +c} i 4 a, C. vw Signature: Date Contact Person Name (If other than applic�litt} ��, � � , �A -� �_ Phone: ' S-114— 0 Owner Information Name: Amiz - Address: Pholae (W) Print or Type; Name. Signature-. .Sim 7-111 Phone (hl) Fax Email Addres5 Date Civil Engineering Site Design 118 East Broadway St., PO Box 566, Monticello N N 55362 Phone: 763-314-0929 www.civilesd,com 0 9 a.F. City of Corcoran Attn: Ms. Kendra Lindahl, City Planner 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, Mn 55340 FILE COPY Re: Strehler Estates 22900 Strehler Road, Corcoran Narrative for Preliminary Plat Submittal Dear Ms. Lindahl, Please accept this letter as a narrative submittal related to the proposed Strehler Estates development project. This narrative is written on behalf of the project applicant CCS Partnership LP and owner Craig Scherber. Sketch plan of the project was reviewed by City Council on 0412312015. The Strehler Estates project proposes subdivision of an existing 80 acre property into 4 lots. The property currently has one existing single family home near Strehler Road that will remain. Subdivision of the property would allow for 3 new single family home sites, and would utilize all existing building rights for the property. The existing property is oddly shaped with limited frontage on Strehler Road. The shape of the property from Strehler Road extends north, then east, and then south. The odd shape of the property is not conducive to lots with frontage on a typical public road. The length of public road necessary to access the proposed lots is cost prohibitive for the developer at the time of subdivision, and is cost prohibitive for the City when considering long term maintenance needs. The project is proposed with lots that would be provided access via a private drive and cul -de -sac. The private drive section proposed would be consistent with the City standard details for shared aggregate driveway as denoted on the plans. Benefiting property owners would share in the cost of maintenance therefore relieving the City of maintenance cost burden. Strehler Estates Page 2 of 2 Narrative for Preliminary Plat Submittal August 03, 2015 It is understood that current City ordinances prohibit private drive access. It is requested that the City process an ordinance amendment that would allow for private drive access. The ordinance amendment should include the generation of standards that should include: • modification of lot frontage definition to include frontage on private drive • signage and /or entrance improvements that would identify the private drive separate from a typical public road • recording of easements for ingress /egress for benefiting properties • maintenance agreement for benefiting properties • requirement for home owners association with assessment authority to insure proper maintenance of the private drive No significant trees are proposed to be impacted by the project. Existing significant tree growth areas are located on the east section of the overall property. No improvements are proposed that would impact existing significant trees. It is understood that the current Comprehensive Plan proposes a horse trail corridor along the north boundary of the property. A horse trail corridor along the north boundary can be provided if it is desired by the City. We look forward to discussing these items further at review meetings. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Civil Engineering Design, LLC Scott Dahlke Professional Engineer Cc: File 00526 Agenda Item 5_b. L A N D F 0 R M From Site to Finish 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 TO: Corcoran Planning Commission FROM: Kathleen Hammer through Kendra Lindahl, Landform • Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 www.landform.net DATE: August 27, 2015 for the September 3, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting RE: PUBLIC HEARING. Preliminary Plat for the property at 20901 County Road Number 117 (PID 03- 119 -23 -12 -0002 and PID 03- 119 -23 -13 -0001) (city file no. 15 -018) 60 DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: N/A Application Request Chris Rains is requesting approval of a preliminary plat to create a 10 -acre lot (Lot 1) and one 63- acre outlot. The subdivision is simply a reconfiguration of the lot lines between the two existing parcels to increase the size of the homestead lot. 2. Context The two parcels in the proposed Fehn Meadows plat total 73.0 acres. Parcel 03- 119 -23 -13 -0001 (proposed Outlot A) has seven development rights remaining. The proposed outlot is undeveloped and no improvements are proposed. The parcel located at 20909 County Road 117 was originally part of the Fehn property, but was separated and is not part of the Fehn Meadows plat. Background On March 26, 2015, the City approved a topography waiver for the entire site and provided comments on an 8 -lot subdivision. A wetland delineation was completed and shows one wetland on Lot 1 and multiple wetlands on the proposed outlot. Zoning and Land Use The property is zoned Rural Residential and is guided Rural /Ag Residential. The property is outside of the MUSA. Surrounding Properties The surrounding property is zoned Rural Residential and is guided Rural /Ag Residential. The property across County Road 117 is located in the City of Rogers. Landform', SensiblyGreen and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. i Natural Characteristics of the Site r • There is one wetland on the proposed Lot 1 and multiple wetlands scattered on the proposed outlot. A channel of Rush Creek runs along the south portion of the property. The area adjacent to the creek is located in the Shoreland Overlay District. There are floodplain areas on the south and west portion of the property of the proposed outlot. The 2030 Parks and Trails Plan shows a Greenway Corridor along the west and south side of the parcel. 3. Analysis Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer's comments are incorporated into this staff report and included as an attachment. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision - Making The City's discretion in approving a preliminary and final plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City's subdivision ordinance and zoning ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Preliminary Plat Lot Size The plat would create one 10 -acre lot for the existing farmstead and a 63.0 -acre outlot. Proposed Lot 1 and the proposed Outlot A meet all RR District standards. Structures The plans show one existing home and one existing accessory structure on proposed Lot 1. These two buildings are currently on different lots (1.24 acres and 71.75 acres, respectively) and the plat will adjust the lot lines to create a 10 -acre parcel that include both buildings. The existing home complies with all setback requirements. The accessory building is 4,207 square feet. Section 1030.020 allows an accessory structure to exceed 3,969 sq. ft. with a conditional use permit in the RR District. The accessory building meets the required 20 -foot side setback and 15 -foot rear setback and is setback more than 10 feet from the principal building The City Code identifies an agricultural building as a building which is not used for storage of personal or business vehicles or materials unrelated to the agricultural use of the property. If the existing structure is deemed an agricultural building, the 100 -foot setback from all property lines required for agricultural buildings is not currently met by the existing accessory structure. This existing accessory structure is a legal non - conforming structure due to size and possibly the setbacks for agricultural buildings. Section 1030.010, Subd. 2(B) allows legal, non - conforming uses Fehn Meadows Preliminary Plat (city file 15 -018) 2 September 3, 2015 • 1 r to continue at the same size and in the same manner of operation as it existed on the date it became a legal, non- conforming use. No changes are required to the existing structures. Well and Septic The existing well and septic will be used. Streets No new streets are proposed. The preliminary plat shows a 40 -foot half right -of -way on County Road 117 (minor connector) adjacent to the property. As required by state law, the City submitted the proposed plat to Hennepin County for review. Hennepin County is not requesting any additional right -of -way at this time. However, when the outlot is developed, the County will likely request additional right -of -way for County Road 117. Typically, the County requests a 50- foot' /2 right -of -way. Public Safety Review The plans were distributed to the public safety agencies for review and comment. As of the date of this report, no comments were received. City Engineer Review The City Engineer reviewed the plat and prepared a memo dated August 26, 2015 stating that there are no engineering issues. Wetlands A wetland delineation report complete on March 17, 2015 identified one wetland on proposed Lot 1, classified as a medium quality wetland on the Natural Resource Communities Quality Ranking Map. The report also indicated a number of wetlands on Outlot A. The City of Corcoran wetland requirements in Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance do not require wetland buffers /monument/easements over wetlands on outlots that are planned for future development. Staff believes that these can be obtained when the outlot is platted for development. However, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission ( ECWMC) is requesting that the landowner provide buffers and monuments on the proposed outlot. The City is in discussion with the ECWMC to determine wetland, floodplain and shoreland buffer requirements in situations where the City Code and the watershed requirements are inconsistent. However, in order to ensure that the standards are met, we have included a condition requiring the applicant to comply with the more restrictive requirement. The plan shows five wetland buffer monuments, complying with Section 1050.010 Subd. 7, which requires permanent wetland buffer monuments to be installed at each lot line and as needed to indicate the contour of the wetland boundary (not more than 200 feet apart). Fehn Meadows Preliminary Plat (city file 15 -018) September 3, 2015 0 ;,, Section 1050.010, Subd. 5 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that required wetland buffers be planted with vegetation in accordance with Section 1050.010, Subd. 8 (Buffer Strip Vegetation Performance Standards). The average wetland buffer width for medium quality wetlands should be 25 feet (minimum 20 feet /maximum 40 feet) with a 15 -foot structure setback from the buffer. The plans comply with the City wetland buffer and setback requirements. Shoreland Overlay District The applicant must revise the plans to show the Shoreland Overlay District (Section 1050.020), which is located in the outlot. The City does not require buffers on outlots approved for agricultural land uses, the City will require buffers when the outlot is platted. Section 1050.020 subd. 12 allows general cultivation farming within shore impact zones a long as permanent vegetation is maintained. The ECWMC is requesting buffers on Rush Creek and the North Fork of Rush Creek to have an average of 50 -feet wide and a minimum of 25 -feet wide easement from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of the creek. The watershed is requesting an average of 25 -feet wide and minimum of 10 -feet wide buffers for all other watercourses on the property. The applicant is responsible for contacting ECWMC to ensure compliance. In order to ensure that the standards are met, we have included a condition requiring the applicant to comply with the more restrictive requirement. Floodplain The FEMA maps identify floodplain areas in the outlot. Section 1050.030 allows agricultural uses in the Floodplain Overlay District. The City standards are met; however, the applicant is responsible to comply with the ECWMC requirements as well. Elm Creek Watershed adopted new standards as of January 1, 2015 that require all floodplains, wetlands and buffers to be covered by easements. In the review subdivision the watershed requires the outlot be included as well as proposed Lot 1. The watershed is requesting buffers on Rush Creek and the North Fork of Rush Creek to have an average of 50 -feet wide and a minimum of 25- feet wide easement from the OHWL of the creek. The watershed is requesting an average of 25 -feet wide and minimum of 10 -feet wide buffers for all other watercourses on the property. In order to ensure that the standards are met, we have included a condition requiring the applicant to comply with the more restrictive requirement. Drainage and Utility Easements Section 945.060, Subd. 2 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires 10 -foot drainage and utility easements around the perimeter of the lot. The plans comply with City requirements. Parks and Trails The adopted 2030 Parks & Trails Plan shows an on -road trail on County Road 117 and an off -road trail adjacent to Rush Creek. Fehn Meadows Preliminary Plat (city file 15 -018) September 3, 2015 • • Staff notes that Section 955.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance states "Park Dedication is only due in cases where additional new parcels are created." The subdivision will be adjusting lot lines; therefore, no park dedication is due. When Outlot A is platted, it will be subject to the park dedication requirements in place at that time. The previous City Council indicated that parcels in the rural area would be required to pay cash -in -lieu of land rather than land dedication. Consequently, it is staff's understanding that the trail easement on the south side of the creek will not be required to be dedicated within Outlot A. However, this decision will be made by the City Council at the time Outlot A is platted. Access Proposed Lot 1 and the proposed outlot will be accessed by existing drives. No new development is proposed on either Lot. There is an accessory building on the proposed Lot 1 that is currently accessed by the adjacent drive at 20909 County Road 117. The applicant must either provide their own access to the existing structure by constructing a driveway, or provide proof of access agreement with adjacent property owner and will be a condition of approval. C. Conclusions Staff has reviewed the preliminary plat for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. Staff noted in the staff report the outstanding issues that must be addressed and have included conditions in the attached draft resolutions to address these issues. 4. Action Move to recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to the findings and conditions in the attached resolution. Attachments 1. Draft resolution approving Preliminary Plat 2. Location map 3. Natural resource map 4. Engineer's Memo dated August 26, 2015 5. Hennepin County comments dated August 20, 2015 6. Metro West Inspections comments dated July 31, 2015 7. Applicant's narrative dated July 30, 2015 8. Preliminary Plat graphics dated July 30, 2015 Fehn Meadows Preliminary Plat (city file 15 -018) September 3, 2015 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -XX Motion By: Seconded By: xx, 2015 A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 20901 COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 117 (PID 03- 119 -23 -13 -0001) (CITY FILE NO. 15 -018) WHEREAS, Chris Rains has requested approval of a preliminary plat to create a 10 -acre lot and a 63 -acre outlot. The property legally described as: That part of West Half of the NorthEast Quarter of Section 3, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, beginning at a point on the East line thereof, distant 233.55 feet South along said East line from the NorthEast corner thereof; thence West parallel with the North line thereof, distant 280 feet; thence South parallel with the East line thereof, distant 1198.89 feet; thence West parallel with the North line thereof, distant 500 feet; thence North parallel with the East Line thereof, distant 520 feet; thence East parallel with the North Line thereof, distant 434 feet; thence North parallel with the East line thereof, distant 912.44 feet to the North line thereof; thence West along said North line to the NorthWest corner of said West Half of the NorthEast Quarter; thence South to the SouthWest corner thereof; thence East to the SouthEest corner of said West Half of the NorthEast Quarter; thence North to the point of beginning, EXCEPT road. Together with: The North 233.55 feet of the East 280.00 feet of the NorthWest Quarter, of the NorthEast Quarter, Section 3, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT road. The Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota UMB WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the submitted preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, that it does approve the request for a preliminary plat subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved, in accordance with the plans received by the City on July 30, 2015, except as amended by this resolution. 2. No new lots are proposed, therefore, no park dedication is required. Park dedication shall be required when Outlot A is developed. 1 There are seven development rights remaining on Outlot A and zero building rights remaining on Lot 1. 4. The existing accessory building on Lot 1 is allowed to remain Page 1 of 3 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -XX 5. Prior to the release of the Final Plat, the applicant must: xx, 2015 a. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of the August 26, 2015 City Engineer's memo. b. The applicant must obtain approval of the wetland delineation from Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission ( ECWMC) and comply with any conditions of approval. c. The applicant must comply with the wetland requirements in Section 1050.010 of the City Code. Where the City requirements are different than the ECWMC requirements, the applicant shall comply with the more restrictive. d. The applicant must comply with the floodplain requirements in Section 1050.030. The City will require buffers and monuments at the time the Outlot is platted. e. The applicant must revise the plans to show the Shoreland Overlay district. The City does not require buffers and monuments on the proposed Outlot. (Where the City requirements are different than the ECWMC requirements, the applicant shall comply with the more restrictive.) 6. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, the applicant must: a. The existing accessory building is accessed via a driveway on the adjacent property. The applicant must either provide the City with authorization from adjacent landowner for this access or relocate the access to be located entirely on Lot 1 in compliance with City requirements. b. Record the approving resolutions, mylar and all related documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. c. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance prior to the release of escrow. i. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. ii. Wetland buffer signs must be installed at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of 200 feet of wetland edge as shown on the preliminary plat. iii. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. d. Lot corner monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. A financial guarantee shall be required to ensure installation per city requirements. Page 2 of 3 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -XX 7. Prior to release of escrow, the applicant must: xx, 2015 a. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plat drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. b. The applicant must plant the wetland buffers in accordance with Section 1050.010 Subd. 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Approval of the preliminary plat shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat. \ //1T1\IP1 A \/r' VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Hank, Pat ❑ Keefe, Mike ❑ LaFave,Tonya ❑ Thomas, Ron \ /P1T1\I0- \1 Av VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Hank, Pat ❑ Keefe, Mike ❑ LaFave,Tonya ❑ Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this xx day of October 2015. ATTEST: Jessica Beise — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 3 of 3 City Seal Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page 1 of 1 I n �r I- ENUr rvG;P �117) SC:5 _ Q _ — I 2 Z U i _ i i t HILL51M DRIVE Parcel I Map Scale: 1" = 1600 ft. N 03- 119 -23 -13 -0001 A -T -I3: Abstract ID: Print Date: 8/25/2015 44V Owner Richard J & Judith A Fehn Market $515,500 Name: Total: Parcel 20901 Co Rd No 117 Tax $3,004.46 Address: Corcoran, MN 55374 Total: (Payable: 2015) Property Sale Farm Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or Stead: Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 71.75 acres Sale Area: 3,125,572 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 -I Ins. Green https: / /gis.hennepin.us /Property /print /default. aspx ?C= 455248 .2284780287,4999472.19870... 8/25/2015 Hennepin County Natural Resources Interactive Map Interactive Maps Welcome Results Legend FEMA Floodplains - 100 Year L A, 0 AE, AH, AO, AE, FLOODWAY Wetlands Potential Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - HCWI ® Probable Wetland - NWI Measure 20901 Cr 117,corcoran Find a PID or an address on the map Engineer's Memo To: Kendra Lindahl, City Planner From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Date: August 26, 2015 Subject: Fehn Meadows V^A V WENCK Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. No Enaineerina Items A The lot line adjustment that is being platted has no engineering items. Wenck Associates, Inc. 1 1800 Pioneer Creek Center I P.O. Box 249 1 Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0249 Toll Free 800 - 472 -2232 Main 763 - 479 -4200 Email wenckmp @wenck.com Web wenck.com Hennepin County Public VVorks i Transportation Department ]amen N, Grupe R.E., County i ilghway engineer 612 - 595 -0300, Nione 1600 Prairie Drive 612 321 3110, fax Medina, Minnesota 55340 www. l7enriepirt .uiJt��i��sp��rtatinn Ms. Kendra Lindahl, City Planner, AICP August 2011, 2015 Landforni 105 5.5fh Ave. Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Re: Fehn Meadows Preliminary Plat Gear Ms. Undahl., Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462,358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. The Preliminary Plat for Fehn Meadows was received from the City Planner on July 27[", 2015. This Plat proposes to split the parcel at 20901 County Road 117 into two properties; one of which is '10 acres, and the other 63 acres, used on staff review of the Flat, the following comments are provided: Access— No new access is hieing proposed for this site. Right-of-Way Recognizing that this action is just a minor technical revision, no additional Right - of-Way is being requested at this time. However, when the larger 63 acre lot Is developed we will request additional Right-of-Way at that time. Perrntts — Please inform the developer that all proposed construction within county right -of -way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction, This includes, but is not limited to driveway and street access, drainage and utility Construction, trail development, and landscaping. Permit questions can be directed to Steve Groen at (612) 596 -0337 or c ey .rr;Utvlea t3ennel i� am. Please contact Bob 13yers (612] 596 -0359 or rnbedt.bt 9LJ @lferrrleaiMus for any further discu.gsion of these items. Sincerely, James N. Grube, P.E. County Highway Engineer iNG,ljdg. M. Fiat Review Committee Members Maric Larsen, Hennepin County Survey Office TO: Kendra Lindahl Fr+cm- Loren Kohnen., Zoning Administrator Data July 31, 2015 Re: Preliminary & Final Plat Fehn Meadows Co. Rd. 117 City of Corcoran The Plat appears fine. Note they may have a problem accessing Outlot A to the south because of wet land. FEHN MEADOWS FEHN MEADOWS is a proposed 2 lot plat located at 20901 County Road 117 in the NE 1/4 of section 3. The two existing parcels; #03- 119 -23 -12 -0001 & #03- 119 -23 -13 -0001 which total 73.0 +/- acres will be platted into one 10.0 acre lot and one 53.0 acre outlot. Parcel # 03- 119 -23 -12 -0001 is an existing homestead which will become part of the 10.0 acre lot. Parcel # 03- 119 -23 -13 -0001 is undelveloped and will remain an undeveloped outlot. Parcel # 03- 119 -23 -12 -0002 is an existing homestead which is surrounded by FEHN MEADOWS. This parcel is not included in the plat. There are no proposed improvements to the site. The Owner desires to reconfigure the property boundaries to increase the size of the homestead lot. There are several wetlands on the site. These have been delineated and are shown on the plat. The owner understands that the City requires drainage easements around the wetland areas. These are shown for the 10 acre lot. However, the Owner requests that the City waive this requirement for the outlot. In the future, when the outlot is developed or re- platted, it will then not be hindered with the need to vacate existing easements. The Owner requests that the City review and approve the plat of FEHN MEADOWS. ro m v LU w M N a Q a a 4 U CDM ari Q a �o 0 0 m -d 0 ;_ tw I1 Y��� 1 II I' 11 _ 11-7 r r• t t I t. � � ! 1 � i I�+r� � � % 1 1 �°' ►► ►1 1 I �� / � � � ■ 1 1 s � A'....1 t p - NF Cor. of W 1~ NL; 4, 0 -1 Y ! ails 3, • �� ♦ ►- - ■ IYI ! 1 1 ► SeC rwp9l9, Rng 23 ' - . 1 ► f - �. ► ► I �.a } � e/ pp p I i 50 a 1 r % T r �r ^- ...«.- -•- fir. I ►1 # 1 // S $ ► IYI r 1 i r • �'1° I i € Jt ,. j'°_ ^- •,- °,« T,°.P P - _ t i� �� ► f ^ -E. L9he Of W 112, NE 114, �" ; 23355 - O y `' ► Sec JN&P 119, Rn 2 _ �� z _ .. 47�� . - _ M� b . ► °s,'.81 ry ° _ I 2 r/ € �� ! ZONE AE i PL5 439 -° s �� w P ry_ e W q � ' q"�► r / �5� w 7 Fnd IP "NOR FRIC gl 25 Ft/ I 172!.5 �� g —� «, __ ���w� «� ,� �� - aa3 We t1 d �� y - Drainage qa� r x x9as gam + d g PLS' 24992 - -T RL6H ,,6?EEf�" -� _ _ S�Eo W 1 ►� Buffer �r z" Easement - ~� ) °� % f y2 i O I■ r, ' ti_ x gry3 a,� f a / 91228 — xg / Nt f#,-'Sec. 3 r v j IYEZ LAND -.., q 1 . �.°"- %ay�� � � � -�?- -� -�-,.. x x x9 a L� / za 6 5 g# i '_!': � ::: : : - q a z4{ o OOY- Q 6 S .Ft v i . 1 � �] 9 � „,.,.° m / � • , •M f(1 O� +4Gre9 - -� 9- x - --- Oy --- � X41 ;Y � J � � w 13`45 °� 2CCl pp �.� " °� � x � .... ...-- '-� x xg a 9'Q• � 6a � / � .`°� °� � €,,,- ;..,:;>�tt;�`;z�::, �`; ::i:C:, � ..,., `B 1:0 t� �m / �� b x `� g2 � x .�' �,$ � � { �� / 5 �` ter'?',:... y o zoNE B x ..� 6 Lo z 5 C� 1 �1 x x 9 g �- z ,b i � � � � � �► i � � � .% ,,,,. - -• 'v'". -� � � x x9'!. xg'#,5' � 0.7� gay1, �6,� r� "...,.,... 4; y :.:.:::::.:::: r::;..: s: .,:.::::�:.:.:::.,;:•::i:: ""„,, P,411el With, E Line Of W 112 NE 1 5 3 15f f f r -- _ ___ _ � � � � _ 119 tl x ffr -EDGE OF FIELD X � ' t It\ �co G VET D~- ~ 3 G ` �❑ / F Q' - _ — r�+�...,.�.. � 9. -1[°. �5 m i a xg °s ..9a6 9,�� ° -a°.° °� nh 1,, t� f~ < CU LVERT QHU fo i= j ►ti j 0 100 x SPOT ELEVATION OH OVERHEAD UTILITY # 9 # � .l TELEPHONE PEDESTAL —X —x—CHAIN LINK FENCE �il�jII o 1,, f f~ < CU LVERT fo i= U au ►ti j 0 100 C m SPOT ELEVATION OH OVERHEAD UTILITY # 9 E ll � 0 TELEPHONE PEDESTAL —X —x—CHAIN LINK FENCE �il�jII j [1111 ! SCALE IN FEET * HAND HOLE CONCRETE CURB IIj FR MISC FRUIT =CONCRETE BASIS FOR BEARINGS: _t THE N. LINE OF W 1/2, NE 1/4, MA MAPLEg1 -'\ CONTOUR SEC 3, TWP 129, RNG 23 IS ASSUMED 027'34" TO BEAR NORTH 89 EAST L1 7 1 R� r� SPRUCE x 0 DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON I E � q'S'V 9 A� qj,. F • 1•w ,3 17�, 70 7Y. Sq -Fx, 7,100% ACr s l� PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES r ® _ __ _ - a , xq■ .Sw [:or. Ut W 112, ' >' _ f "N NE 114, Sec. 3 i 1 In � � y (Center Of Sea 3j�- -� \ �_ �-Frady - Fence Post I�N ii SURVEY LEGEND y f Vii_ BENCHMARKS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (per tax statement) 0 POWER POLE >a STORM SEWER BM 1: Hennepin County Control Point "EBERT" Located At NW Cor. Of Oakdale Drive And Ebert Road Elevation = 960.57 Feet (NAVD 88). BM 2: Railroad Spike In North Face Of Power Pole Located At SW Quadrant Of County Road 117 And Cain Road Elevation = 939.48 Feet (NAVD 88). BM 3: SW COT. Of Concrete Pad Located On West Side Of Existing Building On Site Elevation = 934.33 Feet (NAVD 88). EXISTING ZONING: Zone (R -R) Rural Residential District FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: Per the Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0039, effective date of September 2, 2004 this property is contained in multiple zones. Zone X: Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain; Zone X (shaded): Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths Iess than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by Ievees from 1% annual chance flood; Zone AE (shaded): Base flood elevations determined; Zone AE (hatched): The floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights That part of W 112 of the NE 114 of Section 3, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, beginning at a point on the East line thereof, distant 233.55 feet South along said East line from the NE corner thereof; thence West parallel with the North line thereof, distant 280 feet; thence South parallel with the East line thereof, distant 1198,89 feet; thence West parallel with the North line thereof, distant 500 feet; thence North parallel with the East Line thereof, distant 520 feet; thence East parallel with the North Line thereof, distant 434 feet; thence North parallel with the East line thereof, distant 912.44 feet to the North line thereof; thence West along said North line to the NW corner of said W 1/2 of the NE 114; thence South to the SW corner thereof; thence East to the SE corner of said W 112 of the NE 114; thence North to the point of beginning, EXCEPT road. Together with: The North 233.55 feet of the East 280.00 feet of the NW 114, of the NE 114, Section 3, Township 199, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT road. j DECIDUOUS TREE NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I4 10 it 10 -`j 10 10 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AND RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. MAIL BOX f~ < CU LVERT E - GUY WIRE ELE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC j 0 100 •9725 SPOT ELEVATION OH OVERHEAD UTILITY i f tl I E ll Qo�€as 0 TELEPHONE PEDESTAL —X —x—CHAIN LINK FENCE �il�jII j [1111 ! SCALE IN FEET * HAND HOLE CONCRETE CURB IIj FR MISC FRUIT =CONCRETE BASIS FOR BEARINGS: THE N. LINE OF W 1/2, NE 1/4, MA MAPLEg1 -'\ CONTOUR SEC 3, TWP 129, RNG 23 IS ASSUMED 027'34" TO BEAR NORTH 89 EAST P! PINE aurR WETLAND BUFFER WITH SP SPRUCE MONUMENT SIGN 0 DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON � MONUMENT SET, MARKED "RLS 17255" TR TREE (GEN) C REVISED JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AS DELINEATED • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND A, CONIFEROUS TREE )BY KJOLHAUG ENV. ;,k� SERVICES IN MAY 2015 O OENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT j DECIDUOUS TREE NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I4 10 it 10 -`j 10 10 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AND RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. AVE. SITE U Qo�€as MEMORANDUM PATE.. O T .............. .C......0 ........ FRO ............... M RE August 17, 2015 Brad Martens ............................... ............................... City Council, Planni ............................... ............................... Kendra Lindahl, Cit Agenda Item L A N D F O R M From Site to Finish • 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Commission. Parks & Trails Commission Planner Active Corcoran Planninq Applications The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: !to Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 www.landform.net 1. "Strehler Estates" Preliminary Plat and Ordinance Amendment (PID 17- 119 -23 -32 -0004) (city file no. 15 -017). The applicant submitted a request for approval of a preliminary plat to create 4 lots and an ordinance amendment to allow a private drive for property at 22900 Strehler Road. The item is scheduled for a public hearing at the September 3rd Planning Commission meeting and City Council action on October 8th 2. "Fehn Meadows" Preliminary Plat and Final Plat at 20909 County Road Number 117 (PID # 03- 119 -23 -12 -0002 and PID 03- 119 -23 -13 -0001) (city file no. 15 -018). The applicant is requesting approval of a plat to readjust the lot lines between two parcels to create one lot and one outlot. The item is scheduled for a public hearing at the September 3rd Planning Commission meeting and City Council action on October 8 th Also, there are a number of projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out: 1. Corcoran Business Park (City file 06 -005). The City Council granted a one year extension to the final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and is still working to close out this project. Staff has spoken to the applicant and will schedule a meeting when more information is available on the Loretto sewer project. Hope Ministries Conditional Use Permit for Cemetery and Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easement at 19951 Oswald Farm Road (City file 12 -002). Hope Ministries submitted a request for a conditional use permit to allow a cemetery west of the existing church. The application was approved by the City Council on March 22nd and site work had begun. The letter of credit for site improvements has been released but we are holding the escrow pending completion of the approved landscaping. The applicant has indicated that they are considering a site plan amendment application to modify the approved plans. Staff met again with Pastor Brian Lother in December to try to finalize this issue and address some other questions or concerns from him. We hope to be able to wrap this up in the near future. 3. Lano Equipment at 23580 Highway 55 Site Plan Modifications for Cold Storage Building. (31- 119 -23 -34 -0007) (13 -006). This item was approved by the City Council on July 11 n. The building permit has been issued, but staff has determined that the building was not being built according the approved plans. The applicant submitted revised plans and the City Council approved a site plan modification at the June 12th meeting. The only outstanding issue is the completion of the required landscaping. An inspection was conducted on August 13, 2015 and the applicant was notified of the outstanding items. The City has a letter of credit in place to ensure the work is completed as approved. Landform , SensiblyGreen and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 4. Ess Brothers Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for an accessory building at 9350 County Road (PID # 07- 119 -23 -43 -0004) (City File No. 13 -031) The applicant requested approval of a 5,500 square feet detached, accessory building with 20 -foot sidewalls. The City Council approved this item on January 23rd. The applicant must comply with all conditions of approval (which require landscaping improvements) and then staff will inspect before refunding any remaining escrow. The landowner recently contacted staff and is working to address the outstanding landscape requirements. 5. Fox Ridge 2nd Addition Final Plat at 9495 Trail Haven Road (PID 09- 119 -23 -41 -0011) (City File 14- 006). This final plat application for a final plat of Outlot A, Baumeister 3rd Addition was approved by the City Council on May 22 "d. The applicant will prepare mylars for signature and filing. After the documents are filed, the remaining escrow can be released. 6. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning for Peachtree Partners LLC on Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14 -027). The City received the application materials and is currently reviewing for completeness. The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed this request on November 18th and recommended acceptance of a combination of land and cash. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on December 4th and the City Council approved the request on December 11th. The next step would be for the applicant to submit a final PUD plan and plat prior to expiration of the approvals on December 11, 2015. 7. Corcoran Public Works Site Plan Amendment and Variance (city file 15 -006). The site plan amendment and variance are to grant after - the -fact approvals for changes to the approved site plan that were made in the field and generally authorized by the subcommittee. The gravel drive and storage area that was added on the south area of the fenced yard requires a variance. The item was reviewed at a public hearing at the April 2nd Planning Commission meeting and Council approved the request at the April 23rd meeting. Final landscaping and close out issues will occur this summer. 8. Ravinia 3rd Addition Final Plat and Final PUD Plan (City file 15 -007) The Planning Commission reviewed the final PUD plan at their June 4t" meetinp and recommended ap�roval. The City Council approved the final plat and final PUD plan for the 3 phase at their June 25 meeting. The applicant is working to address the remaining issues so that the plat can be released for filing. 9. Commercial Door Addition at 7670 Commerce Street (City file 15 -010) The City received an application for approval of a building addition, which required a conditional use permit, interim use permit, variance and site plan approval. The project was reviewed at a public hearing at the June 4 th Planning Commission meeting and was approved by the City Council on June 25th. The applicant is working to address the approval conditions. 10. Sign Ordinance Update (city file 15 -012). At the April 23rd meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare the update. A draft was be prepared for the June 11th Council meeting. The Council reviewed the document, provided feedback and directed staff to schedule for a public hearing at the Planning Commission. The public hearing was held at the Planning Commission on July 7th and the voted unanimously to recommend approval. The City Council adopted the ordinance on July 23'. The new ordinance is now in effect. 11. Ordinance Amendment to Allow Creation of Lots without Development Rights (city file 15 -014). At the May 11th meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment that would allow creation of parcels without development rights. The City Attorney and City Planner will work together to craft a legally defensible ordinance. The public hearing was held at the Planning Commission on July 7th and they voted unanimously to recommend approval. The City Council adopted the ordinance on July 23rd. The new ordinance is now in effect. 12. Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a new Verizon Monopole at 23605 Co Rd 50 (PID30- 119-23-21 -0001) (City File 15 -016). Verizon has requested a conditional use permit and site plan for a new telecommunications tower on the Gleason property located at the southwest corner of County Roads 19 & 50. The public hearing was held at the Planning Commission on July 7th and they voted unanimously to recommend approval. The City Council approved this item on July 23rd. The applicant is working to address the conditions of approval and then will apply for a building permit. MEMORANDUM Finally, there are a few projects that have not yet been started but have been identified as action items or future projects. The City Council did not identify these items as 2015 priority projects: Design Guideline Update for Southeast District /Downtown. The Council approved a Landform proposal to update the existing design guidelines for this area. The design guidelines are adopted as part of the Zoning Ordinance and will be enforced as new development is proposed, consequently, the City Council wishes to revisit that planning effort to ensure it is still consistent with the City's goals. The City Council appointed a subcommittee, but the City Council has decided to delay kickoff as we work through some associated issues as part of some new development plans. The subcommittee has been disbanded and the Council will reconsider this project in 2015. Staff is working with Hennepin County to pursue grant funding for this work. 2. City- Initiated Park Dedication Ordinance Update (City File 14 -007). Staff was directed to bring back other potential amendments for consideration in 2015, including revisions to clarify whether or not existing homes are subject to park dedication when part of a plat, how to ensure that land dedication in the rural areas is fairly required and a review of our park dedication requirements. MEMORANDUM M CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 — Office 763.420.6056 — Fax E -mail - general(cDci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mmus MEMO Meeting Date: September 3, 2015 To: Planning Commission From: Brad Martens, City Administrator Re: City Council Report The Planning Commission last met on July 7, 2015. The following is a recap of some of the items discussed at City Council meetings since that time. A full recap can be found by reviewing the approved City Council minutes on the website July 9, 2015 • CenterPoint Energy— Community Partnership Grant o Accepted a $2,500 grant from CenterPoint Energy for the purchase of radio equipment. • Resolution 2015 -37 Accepting Maple Grove Lions Club Donation o Accepted a $3,000 donation from the Maple Grove Lions towards Country Daze • Franchise Fees Overview o Presented information on franchise fees to the Council including possible finance scenarios. Council directed staff to provide further information on what items possibly could be funded by franchise fees. • Forklift Purchase o Updated the Council on a recent purchase of a used forklift for the Public Works facility • Street Name Map o Provided the Council an updated map showing future street names as selected by the Council. The new map was accepted. • Conditional Offer— Full -Time Police Officer o Approved a conditional offer with Pete Ekenberg for the open Police Officer position •• • Financial Management Plan o Presented the updated Financial Management Plan to the Council. The document was discussed and staff was directed to proceed forward for the time being with assumptions as presented. • 2016 Budget Priorities and Schedule o A draft timeline was presented along with assumptions for the 2016 budget. Council provided direction in order to complete the first draft and requested a work session be scheduled prior to the August 13th meeting. • City Logo Update o Staff presented a request to begin a process to update the City's logo. Council directed staff to proceed as presented • Financial Performance Report o Informed Council of staff initiative to change the presentation of the Financial Performance Report to the first meeting of the month rather than the second meeting of the month. This will allow for a better picture of where revenues /expenditures are at month end. July 23, 2015 • Liquor Ordinance Update o Approved amendments to the Liquor Ordinance to allow for the sale of strong beer. This was a request from the Country Daze event but will apply more broadly. Council noted some other areas in the ordinance that need to be updated and staff is working on those updates. • City Initiated Sign Ordinance Update o Approved amendments to the Sign Ordinance to allow for larger signs, more lighting options, and dynamic displays. This was a strategic goal of the City Council for 2015. • Consideration of Ordinance Changes Regarding the Creation of Lots Without Development rights. o Approved amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to allow for the creation of lots without development rights if additional rights could be obtained in the future (example: paving gravel road). • Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a New Verizon Telecommunications Tower at 23605 County Road 50. o Approved the request as recommended by staff. • Franchise Fees o Reviewed additional information on the possible establishment of franchise fees. Council was not in favor of establishing franchise fees at this time. •• • Public Hearing: Downtown Utility and Street Improvement Project o Held the improvement hearing for the project in which one individual spoke in support of the project with concerns on use of TIF funds on other projects. Council approved a resolution authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the project which will be completed in late October. • Draft 2016 Budget o Council received the first draft of the 2016 budget. A work session was scheduled for 5:30 pm on August 13, 2015 for additional discussion. • Capital Improvement Plan o Council received the first draft of an updated Capital Improvement Plan. Council requested more information on life expectancy of equipment. Staff will bring back an updated plan at the August 27th meeting. • Administrative Assistant Recruitment Process o Approved the job description and authorized staff to begin the recruitment process. • Conditional Offer— Public Works Maintenance Operator o Authorized the Mayor and City Administrator to extend a conditional offer to Darcy Wandersee for the Public Works Maintenance Operator Position. August 13, 2015 • Police Officer's Oath o City Clerk /Administrative Services Coordinator Jessica Beise issued the oath to Corcoran's newest Police Officer, Pete Ekenberg. • Use of Consultants in Lieu of City Staff o Council reviewed a report on use of consultants to provide various city services (planning, engineering, etc.). Councilmembers discussed the need to plan for when to bring these services in -house as well as a need to understand satisfaction of the services received. • Squad Car Replacement o Lieutenant Burns updated the Council on the replacement schedule for the squad car which was damaged in a recent accident. • Strategic Goal Update o Council reviewed a staff request to amend the strategic goal work plan in regards to planning for the regional recreation amenity. Council directed staff to amend as presented. • Paving Gravel Collector Roads o Reviewed a staff proposal to move forward with paving a portion of Trail Haven Road. Council directed staff to provide further historical information to the City Council for review. • Parks and Trails Commission Recommendation — Parks and Recreation Employee o Council reviewed a recommendation from the Parks and Trails Commission to hire a seasonal position to coordinate recreation activities. Council approved the plan as presented. •• • Parks and Trails Commission Recommendation — Scoreboard Purchase o Council reviewed a 2014 plan to purchase a scoreboard for Snyder field. Council directed staff to proceed as originally planned. • City Council Minutes Discussion o Council reviewed options for recording minutes of City Council meetings. Directed staff to bring two examples back to the August 27th meeting for review. • City Council Schedule o Scheduled a work session for Thursday, August 27th at 5:30 pm to continue discussions on the 2016 budget. Auaust 27. 2015 • Resolution 2015 -47 Accepting Northwest Area Jaycees Donation o Mayor Guenthner read the resolution accepting $5,300 for the purchase of picnic tables and thanked the Jaycees for their generosity. • Night to Unite Recap o Mayor Guenthner accepted the report and thanked everyone who helped make the event a success. • City Council Minutes o Council by consensus directed staff to provide future minutes in a summary style as presented by staff. • Public Works Facility Update o The Council was updated on the status of floor settling issues at the new Public Works Facility. Staff informed Council that action may be requested at the September 10th meeting. • Paving Gravel Collector Roads o Council discussed paving gravel collector roads. Council directed staff to install stop signs on Trail Haven Road at Treeline Drive and 93rd Avenue North unless there are significant issues brought by staff to not have them installed and to work with the Mayor. • Capital Improvement Plan o Council directed staff to develop a vehicle condition index for Corcoran based upon the Eagan model and authorized staff to order a replacement dump truck to be received and paid for in 2016 • 2016 Budget o Mayor Guenthner provided background on the process of setting the Preliminary Levy. • Design Guideline Update o Council approved staff to proceed with the scope of services as presented and selected the community advisory team M • Conditional Offer —Administrative Assistant o Council approved a conditional offer for the Administrative Assistant position to Michelle Friedrich. • Labor Agreement Negotiation Process o Council appointed Mayor Guenthner and Councilmember Hank to work with staff to begin negotiating a new agreement between the City of Corcoran and Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employee's Union Local NO.320. Attachments: N/A