Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-11-18 -Parks & Trails Agenda Packet
City of Corcoran Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission Agenda November 18, 2014 - 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval a. Agenda b. Minutes 10 -21 -2014* 4. Open Forum 5. Presentations - none 6. Reports /Information a. Active Planning Applications — Informational only* 7. Old /Unfinished Business 8. New Business a. Preliminary PUD Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to PUD for "Sawgrass" for Peachtree Partners, LLC on the 103 -acre Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (PID 23- 119 -23 -42 -0003) (City File 14 -027)* b. City- Initiated Ordinance Amendment regarding Park Dedication Requirements (City file 14- 007) c. December Meeting Cancellation 9. Subcommittee & Miscellaneous Reports a. City Council Report — Councilor Cassette* b. Athletic Association c. Park Dedication Fund* 10. Other Business- none 11. Announcements - none 12. Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet by Door. This page has intentionally been left blank City of Corcoran Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission Minutes October 23, 2014 - 7:00 PM 3b. The Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission met on October 21, 2014, at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were Commissioners Anderson, Dale, Meister, Nybo, Regan, and Strehler. Absent: Commissioners Krueger, Robran, and Tessmer. Also present were City Administrator Martens, Administrative Support /Payroll and Benefit Coordinator Smith - Arens, and Councilor Cossette. Commissioner Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval a. Agenda Motion: made by Nybo, seconded by Regan to approve the Agenda as presented Voting Aye: Anderson, Dale, Meister, Nybo, Regan, Strehler (Motion carried 6:0) b. Minutes 09/23/2014 Motion: made by Meister, seconded by Nybo to approve the Minutes as presented Voting Aye: Anderson, Dale, Meister, Nybo, Strehler; Abstaining: Regan (Motion carried 5:0) 4. Open Forum - None 5. Presentations — None 6. Reports /Information a. Active Corcoran Planning Applications — City Administrator Brad Martens updated commissioners. 7. Old /Unfinished Business a. Park Planning — Roehlke Property Commission members took part in a ranking process to develop priorities for Roehlke property. Top Priorities: baseball fields, softball fields, multi - purpose rectangular fields, park shelter, amphitheater; Secondary priorities: open area /picnic area, hockey /skating area, playground equipment, trails, concession stand. Commission discussed next steps and agreed to wait until 2015 for any further planning at direction of new City Council. 8. New Business a. City Council Request — Park Planning Action Plan Commission members discussed steps to create an action plan for planning and developing the future park system as requested by Council. 9. Subcommittee & Miscellaneous Reports a. City Council Liaison — Councilor Cossette b. Athletic Association — Commissioner Dale shared 2015 schedule. c. Park Dedication Fund - Informational 10. Other Business — None 11. Announcements — None 12. Adjournment Motion: made by Dale, seconded by Meister to adjourn the meeting at 8:35 pm Voting Aye: Anderson, Dale, Meister, Nybo, Regan, Strehler (Motion carried 6:0 Jill Smith -Arens — Administrative Support /Payroll and Benefits Coordinator This page has intentionally been left blank MEMORANDUM Agenda Item • • • • L AN D F OR M From Site to Finish 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 • • • • Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 www.landform.net DATE October 16, 2014 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1. Peachtree Partners LLC request for PUD Sketch Plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and EAW for Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14 -005). The sketch plan and comprehensive plan request was reviewed by Parks Commission on March 18th and Planning Commission on March 6th. On June 12th, the City Council approved the Comprehensive Plan amendment. The Met Council completed their review and acted on the request at their August 27th meeting. The applicant has submitted a voluntary EAW and it has been distributed for public comment. The Public Comment Period ends on October 29th. We will bring the EAW to the November 13th Council meeting for action. 2. City- Initiated Park Dedication Ordinance Update (City File 14 -007). At the April 10th meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare a minor update to the park dedication ordinance as outlined in the staff memo. Staff provided a draft to the City Council for review at the June 26th meeting and, based on Council feedback has met with Councilmember Cossette to gather his comments. These comments will require significantly more research and analysis than originally anticipated and will not be ready for a public hearing until this fall. The City Attorney and City Planner agree that since the primary concern in is with the land dedication requirements in the rural areas, we will focus on solutions that are legally defensible and accomplish the City Council goals. We agree that a moratorium (or interim ordinance) is not needed at this time. Should a rural subdivision be submitted, we recommend that the City Council simply take cash in lieu of land while the new ordinance is being developed. There are no current applications in the pipeline that will be affected by the rural area change and we have several full agendas coming up. We are working with the City Administrator to identify a date for an update to the City Council. 3. Administrative Permit and Site Plan to add antennas and modify ground equipment on an existing tower for AT &T antenna at 20140 CR 30 (PID 11- 119 -23 -12 -0001) (city file 14 -019). This applicant may be administratively approved. The application is currently incomplete. 4. Agriculture Preserve Initiation and Expiration for John and Staci Scherber on PID 08- 119- 23 -31- 0004 (city file 14 -026). This applicant is incomplete but is tentatively scheduled for the November 13, 2014 Council meeting. 5. Sawgrass Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Rezoning for Peachtree Partners LLC on Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14 -027). The City received the application materials and is currently reviewing for completeness. The tentative review schedule is November 18th Parks and Trails Commission review, December 4th Planning Commission Pubic Hearing and December 11th City Council action. Landform', SensiblyOreerl® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 Also, there are a number of projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out: 1. Corcoran Business Park (city file 06 -005). The City Council granted a one year extension to the final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and is still working to close out this project. Notably, we met with the land owner in February and may have a new development application for this site later this year. Recent calls to the property owner regarding the project status have not been returned. 2. Hope Ministries Conditional Use Permit for Cemetery and Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easement at 19951 Oswald Farm Road (city file 12 -002). Hope Ministries submitted a request for a conditional use permit to allow a cemetery west of the existing church. The application was approved by the City Council on March 22nd and site work had begun. The letter of credit for site improvements has been released but we are holding the escrow pending completion of the approved landscaping. The applicant has indicated that they are considering a site plan amendment application to modify the approved plans. Staff will reach out again in an effort to close out this file. 3. Heinz Second Addition Preliminary and Final Plat at 20801 CR 117 (03- 119 -23 -14 -0002) (City file 13 -003). A wetland and topographic waiver was approved on January 24th. This item was approved by the City Council action on April 25th. The applicant is working on complying with approval conditions so that they can get the final plat mylar signed and recorded. The applicant has site work to complete and then the escrow can be refunded. 4. Ess Addition (city files 05 -017, 08 -003 and 12 -024). The City Council granted an after - the -fact extension for this final plat at their November 29, 2012 meeting and a second extension at the November 25, 2013 meeting. The plat has been recorded and staff is working with the applicant to address any outstanding issues and close out the file /refund the escrow after wetland monuments and lot monuments are installed. 5. Lano Equipment at 23580 Highway 55 Site Plan Modifications for Cold Storage Building. (31- 119 -23 -34 -0007) (13 -006). This item was approved by the City Council on July 11th. The building permit has been issued, but staff has determined that the building was not being built according the approved plans. The applicant submitted revised plans and the City Council approved a site plan modification at the June 12th meeting. City staff is working with them to make the corrections and complete the building and site improvements. 6. Ess Brothers Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for an accessory building at 9350 County Road (PID # 07- 119 -23 -43 -0004) (City File No. 13 -031) The applicant requested approval of a 5,500 square feet detached, accessory building with 20 -foot sidewalls. The City Council approved this item on January 23rd. The applicant must now file the resolution at the County and then staff will close out the file and refund any remaining escrow. The applicant may apply for a building permit after the resolution is recorded. 7. Maple Hill Estates 3rd Addition Preliminary and Final Plat (PID 24- 119 -23 -43 -0016 and 24- 119 -23- 43 -0014) (city file 14 -001). A site plan and variance was approved on April 25, 2013 for this project, but it was then determined that the new community center should be located on City property. The plat was required to adjust property lines. The City Council approved the preliminary and final plat on March 27th. The mylars were recorded this month and construction has begun. We will be monitoring this throughout construction and due to the financial relationship between the city and the applicant, we will not close out this file until construction is complete. 8. Lennar Final Plat, Vacation, Development Contract and Final PUD Development Plan for "Ravinia" (City file 14 -003). The applications were approved at the April 24th City Council meeting. Staff is now working through the final plan revisions with the applicant. The development contract has been signed, the financial guarantee submitted and the final details are being addressed. An expanded grading plan was approved by the City Council on September 11th and infrastructure work may be beginning this week if the city planner is able to confirm certain conditions have been met. There are still a number of approval conditions that must be addressed prior to release of the final plat mylar for recording. No building can begin until the mylar is recorded at Hennepin County. MEMORANDUM 2 9. City- Initiated Ordinance Update for Sketch Plans (City file 14 -009). At the April 10th meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance update to streamline the sketch plan review process and require Council action only. Staff provided a draft to the City Council for review at the June 26th meeting and, based on Council feedback, a public hearing was held at the September 4th Planning Commission meeting and the City Council approved the change at the September 25th Council meeting. 10. Lake Independence Regional Trailhead at 23475 CR 10 Rezoning, Site Plan and Variance (PID 18- 119 -23 -12 -0002) (city file 14 -010). Three Rivers Park District has submitted a request for a temporary trailhead at this location. The City Council approved the request on July 24th. Three Rivers has indicated that they did not receive any bids this summer and will rebid the project the spring for 2015 construction. 11. Fox Ridge 2nd Addition Final Plat at 9495 Trail Haven Road (PID 09- 119 -23 -41 -0011) (City File 14- 006). This final plat application for a final plat of Outlot A, Baumeister 3rd Addition was approved by the City Council on May 22nd. The applicant will prepare mylar for signature and filing. After the documents are filed, the remaining escrow can be released. 12. Hentges Lawn Land Snow Special Home Occupation at 21310 Meadow Lane (City file 14 -012). The application was approved by the City Council on August 28th. Staff will be working to close out the file. 13. Topographic Survey and Wetland Delineation Waiver for Mike Patnode at 22610 CR 50 (city file 14 -014). The applicant has submitted an application and staff has notified them of additional items needed to make this item complete. This request was approved at the July 24th Council meeting. 14. Patnode Farms Preliminary Plat and Final Plat at 22610 County Road 50 (PID 20- 119- 23 -43- 0003) (city file 14 -021). Mike Patnode has submitted a request for plat approval to create one lot for the existing home and one outlot to be sold. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 4, 2014 and the City Council approved it at the September 25th meeting. Staff working with the applicant to finalize the documents and release them for filing at the County. 15. Certificate of Compliance for John Scherber at 9305 Bechtold Road (PID 08- 119 -23 -44 -0001) (city file 14 -023). Administrative approval was granted for a new silo on this property. 16. Topographic and Wetland Waiver Request from Donald Proehl, Jr. at 20630 Larkin Road (PID 26- 119 -23 -23 -0001) (city file 14 -024). Mr. Proehl has requested approval of a topographic survey and wetland delineation waiver to allow him to subdivide his property to split off a lot for the existing home built for a farmhand from the principal farmstead and farm land. The City Council reviewed this item on September 25, 2014 and approved the waivers. The next step would be to submit a plat and variance application. 17. Administrative Permit for a Sprint Antenna replacement at 23400 CR 10 (PID 07- 119 -23 -43 -0004) (city file 14 -025). An administrative permit was received to upgrade the antennas on this existing tower. The application was administratively approved. Finally, there are a few projects that have not yet been started but have been identified as action items or future projects: 1. Sign Ordinance Update. At the April 25th Council meeting, the City reviewed a request for the city to initiate a sign ordinance update. Specifically, they requested that the City review the ordinance standards relating to sign area, sign height and internal illumination and, because this is a city -wide issue, that the ordinance update be completed by the City out of the City funds. The Council discussed the issue and directed staff to bring a proposal back at a later date because the Council felt that this was a significant undertaking that would involve much more than this one issue. We will work with the City Administrator to determine the appropriate meeting to have this considered. 2. Design Guideline Update for Southeast District /Downtown. The Council approved a Landform proposal to update the existing design guidelines for this area. The design guidelines are adopted as part of the Zoning Ordinance and will be enforced as new development is proposed, consequently, the MEMORANDUM 3 City Council wishes to revisit that planning effort to ensure it is still consistent with the City's goals. The City Council appointed a subcommittee, but the City Council has decided to delay kickoff as we work through some associated issues as part of some new development plans. The subcommittee has been disbanded and the Council will reconsider this project in 2015. MEMORANDUM 4 • • • • L A N D From Site to Finish F Agenda Item: O R M • • • 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Suite 513 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 Minneapolis, MN 55401 www.landform.net TO: Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: November 10, 2014 for the November 18, 2014 Parks and Trails Commission Meeting RE: Preliminary PUD Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to PUD for "Sawgrass" for Peachtree Partners, LLC on the 103 -acre Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (PID 23- 119 -23 -42 -0003) (City File 14 -027) 60 -DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: December 16, 2014 1. Application Request Peachtree Partners, LLC has submitted a request for approval of a preliminary PUD development plan, preliminary plat and rezoning to PUD to allow a 249 -unit development to be called "Sawgrass" on 103.32 acres. The Planning Commission is tentatively scheduled to hold a public hearing at the December 4th meeting and the Council is expected to take action on the request in December. The Parks and Trails Commission should review and make a recommendation on the park dedication requirements. 2. Context Background The applicant presented conceptually to the Parks and Trails Commission in March of this year. The Commission voted unanimously to require the off -road trails as shown on the Comprehensive Plan and accept cash -in -lieu of land for the remainder of the park dedication. The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed the PUD sketch plan at their March 18th meeting and provided the following advisory comments: • The Commission was unsure whether natural areas within the development should be accepted as park and maintained by the City or whether they should be controlled and maintained by a homeowners association. • The Commission found the trail plan within the development to be generally acceptable. • The Commission agreed that the City Park is not sufficient in size to become an athletic complex and that the future athletic complex should be located on the Roehlke property of which the City has a purchase agreement. • The Commission agreed that park dedication in the form of fees is preferred to land acquisition to allow for improvements to the park as well as possible funds to purchase the Roehlke property. Landform', SensiblyGrcen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. • • • The Commission discussed the proposed location of the entrance to the proposed development and asked staff to look into if it could be shifted to the east to minimize the impacts to the City Park. • The Commission stated the importance of Meister field and that if the field were to be removed a temporary field would need to be constructed to meet the needs of the athletic association. It was also discussed that it takes two years to establish a field. • The Commission stated that if a cul -de -sac was built to serve the existing properties at the County Road 10 /County Road 50 intersection trail connections should also be provided. Zoning and Land Use The property is currently guided Low Density Residential and zoned RMF -3 (High Density Residential) and UR (Urban Reserve). The Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reclassify the property from High to Low Density was approved and now the City will be required to rezone to a district compatible with this land use classification. Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties to the west are guided Low Density Residential and Mixed Residential and zoned UR. The properties to the north are guided Mixed Residential and High Density Residential and zoned UR. The properties to the east are guided Medium Density Residential and Public /Semi - Public and are zoned UR and P -I (Public Institutional). The four parcels to the south (and north of County Road 10) are guided Commercial and zoned C -1 (neighborhood commercial). The property to the south across County Road 10 is guided Parks /Open Space and Public /Semi- Public and zoned P -I and UR. Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a number of low and medium quality wetlands scattered around the site. The wetland delineation was approved by Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission on January 3, 2014. A High Quality Natural Community is located in the north (Maple Basswood Forest) and east (Floodplain Forest) areas of the site. Rush Creek and an unnamed tributary are adjacent to or within the site; consequently, a portion of the site is in the shoreland overlay district. A portion of the site is also located in the floodplain. 3. Analysis of Request Parks and Trails Under the current ordinance, park dedication is required at 11% of the net pre - development area or 11% of the appraised value of the land for developments like this with between 3 -5 units per acre. In this case, the plat shows 90.46 pre - development net acres, which would require: • Park dedication of 9.94 net acres (90.46 x 11%); • Cash in lieu of land of $318,230 ($2,893,000 x 11%); or • Some combination of land and cash. Peachtree Partners, LLC Preliminary Plat (14 -027) 2 November 18, 2014 • Trails and Sidewalks The applicant is showing a series of sidewalks and trails throughout the site. The Comprehensive Plan includes the 2030 Parks & Trails Plan shows an off -road trail on the north side of the site winding through the site and connecting to the existing city park. The plan is generally consistent with these trail locations. The plans show 1.3 miles of trail and 2.0 miles of sidewalk within this development. The trail locations shown on the plans are generally consistent with the adopted parks plans. However, the trail connection two County Road 10 is shifted east from the adopted plan to the project entrance. From a safety standpoint, this makes sense. However, staff notes that the new trail connection is next to a street rather than in an off -road location. The current location of the trail connection to County Road 10 is a trail in lieu of a sidewalk. The Commission should consider the following: • Should park dedication be granted for the portion adjacent to the entrance road? • If park dedication is to be granted for this segment, should it be supplemented with a sidewalk on the other side of the road? f f +l v. , . to : 4 r t I - _ _ II 1 4_ f _ _Id of ■ S }� 4 C 'mum I■■ in ri 1 Park dedication shall only be granted for trail easement areas as shown on the Comprehensive Plan and will not be given for trails located within public right -of -way. The developer is required to provide finished grading and ground cover for all park, playground, trail and public open spaces within their developments. No credit toward the required dedication shall be given for this work. • The trail locations are generally consistent with the locations shown on the Comprehensive Plan, but the Commission should review and comment. • If credit is given for the 20 -foot trail easement over all trails as shown by the developer, that would be 2.88 acres or 28.97% (2.88/9.94) of the required park dedication for this project. The Parks & Trails Plan also shows an on -road trail on County Road 10. The City is currently working with Hennepin County on the road realignment options and will evaluate this trail as part of the transportation study. Peachtree Partners, LLC Preliminary Plat (14 -027) November 18, 2014 3 • • Five -foot wide sidewalks are required to be provided on one side of each public street. Generally the plans show compliance with these requirements; however, the plans shall be revised to show these sidewalks to ensure connections throughout the entire development. Specifically: • The sidewalk locations should be extended through the association maintained neighborhood planned in the southeast corner of the site. • To that end, we recommend that the sidewalk be moved to the south side of Street F so that this neighborhood cannot connect to the sidewalk system without a mid -block crossing. • We also recommend that the sidewalk extension be shown on the stub street off the east side of the Street F cul de sac for a future sidewalk connection. Wetland Impacts The plan shows a number of trails located within the wetland buffer. Although the ordinance does allow trails in the wetland buffer setback area, it is silent on the concept of trails in the buffer itself. The applicant notes that due to the location of wetlands and the size of the buffers, the impact to the buffers could not be avoided. The wetland restoration creates over 5 acres of replacement wetland and as a result there is actually more buffer area than there is wetland area. To offset the impacts created by the trail being located in the buffer, the applicant increased the amount of buffer area in an amount equal to the impact. As noted by the developer, this ultimately allows the trail to be located in the open space away from homes and provides for a great trail experience. • The Commission should review the comments and make a recommendation on this impact. Natural Resource Corridor This natural resource corridor is shown as preserved with a trail corridor. The City's Comprehensive Plan encourages preservation of this corridor but does not recommend the land be taken as public park. Staff recommends that the land be preserved and owned /maintained by the Homeowners Association. Community Park A public park to serve as the neighborhood park exists across County Road 10. This is defined in the Parks Plan as a community park, but will also serve the neighborhood park needs of the neighborhood, as noted by the Parks and Trails Commission in March. Good access is provided to this park and the playground by the planned trail and sidewalk connections. Our Comprehensive Plan says that neighborhood parks should be within 1/2 mile of residents. The applicant has provided an exhibit showing that all homes within this development would be within this '/2 mile radius of the existing playground and most would be within 1/4 mile. Summary The City should generally accept park dedication in the form of land where shown on the maps; however, the city may choose to accept cash or a combination of cash and land. The City may accept cash -in -lieu of land at 11% of the value of the land with a maximum rate of $4,000 per unit for each new unit located inside of the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area). The applicant has provided an appraisal report that shows the land value at $2,893,000. Peachtree Partners, LLC Preliminary Plat (14 -027) 4 November 18, 2014 • • Park dedication due on this site would be $318,230 if all in cash. However, if credit is given for the trails, the area of the trails would satisfy 28.97% of the park dedication requirement, leaving 71.03% of the dedication due in land or $226,038.77. Next Steps The application is tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission review on December 41h and Council action on December 111h If the application request is approved by the City Council, the applicant would be able to proceed with the Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat for each phase. The final plat is not reviewed by the Parks and Trails Commission. 4. Action Staff recommends that the Parks and Trails Commission recommend approval of the following, subject to the findings and conditions in the staff report: 1. Accept park dedication for 2.88 net acres of trail corridor (in 20 -foot trail easements) where 9.9 net acres are required to satisfy park dedication requirements for this site. This satisfies 28.97% of the park dedication requirements. 2. Accept the remaining 71.03% of the park dedication as cash in lieu of land. This would be $226,038.77, based on the appraisal. Attachments a. Location Map b. 2030 Park & Trail Map c. Site Graphics Peachtree Partners, LLC Preliminary Plat (14 -027) 5 November 18, 2014 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page 1 of 1 Parcel 23- 119 -23 -42 -0004 ID: Owner Name: Corcoran Bay Holdings LIc Parcel 20400 Co Rd No 10 Address: Corcoran, MN 55340 A -T -B: Abstract Market Total: $1,868,000 Tax $107,515.62 Total: (Payable: 2014) Property Sale Residential Type: Price: Home- Sale Non - Homestead stead: Date: Parcel 103.33 acres Area: 4,500,884 sq ft Sale Code: Map Scale: 1" = 800 ft. Print Date: 11/11/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Think Green! http: / /gis.hennepin.us/ Property /print /default.aspx ?C = 456897 .2084074169,4994064.37858... 11/11/2014 ..r-..r-..r-..r-.■r-..r-..r-.■r-..r-..r- ..■■■•i - r-r-r- ,`,, = , /.1 '' Or -' - ', ,� :-- I - - 1 r ,,1 I -1 , 1 • 1'w-w wrr wi w -r-� r�r. r -r- _f I 1 1 1 I 1 1I i I- - 1 1 .u..,. ' '4 1 -� , -, 1 - r Jl' `_9SP ; i ` ▪ 1 :,-,,,,_ . - rti --�-e -laa - �sw-. -, , 1- `' 4 I ..''' 1- 'a II- t - - ' 1 ST4.4R�'', 1 r , '`, ,r IN 1 • r1 1 rir# 111 • o w Z • 1 7 *f -- , _ - r�I a _- -♦ , 1 ,, -, - , , r1 µ , _, 4• 4 ' 1K11 , �!1:- ,u6.1���Lia....s...*r f I - -V _,' 7,..:,-...? ii",".- it al oar • MEISTER R - ,.. 1 1' 1 u ,`, ` I', ,, 1___, , 1 I I- M • �i#%/ ii?1.1a, 11!- 417.31iwilow...r.1iwM111 /_rsgsrr ?w.1,* -_, ,SCOTT ' _ ; LAKI CHUTT GOAD _ ' w , - , a i 1 `< �► - j -9 - -' ' 1 09.P1-:(--3 '.... R' W 1 ▪ 0 O AD ,--,.......2 , , ' ♦ 4 - -' - ▪ - 4. : -- - �` /`, ,', ,' ` „ ■ -yam -, t- ■ ,, \, lii '- 4 ,`= =I, `s 3.1 -' -. -�- , - - -.:�1 :: 1P1Gi1® #I LARKIN % • 110044 `, 11 • 0,19,.•411, , #: tom+ 1� F - (COOK ■ :LAKE` `" 1 ,',I * -, 1 ``„ a`;I o 1 -, .11,_ , , - --�+1 ,, s•'-‘,..-:1•-, '_ • , , n, � ' ��• � �', �, ,; `I - — JUBERT , - 1U , -r ; > -_ LAKE OSP = /-.---"I',.• , > .''- 1 , ,^' _.'r '- : 1 OSP , -, , _, • /'' Z ` J '- , ...__/' ' ' ' I ,-' r, `, , .,1__ ,/1 ,/ - ' ,1 `• I i 1 ., ,, -' -`' - HORS OE Th I.L. ---- ate ; •i'... , LE 1 1 �• ^•` ' - ii - - -O: ROAD �4 , ,, MORIN "a ♦'b i Ili 1 R ; • �i'= LAKE . , „ � a ' 1 .r -11 - ..r- ..r -.1 -■.i.. r- . ■r -■I - .1- M=..- /.r..1 - 11- 11r- .tr- ■.=,11r- 1■r-11 -.. r-11 11 -'1r -11=11 r- 11-1 ■r 11∎1 - ■IPl���U.. iWM .�w�111 #..•..'�7� ## #•# # ♦ #•♦ ♦#r #y#` • *•♦ # # # # # ###441♦ :,. , ■I. ►A ## +iii•• • * # 1 - - 1 Figure 12 RCORAN Parks & Trails Plan 2030 Comprehensive Plan $ 3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet City Limit 2030 MUSA Open Water Wetlands Existing Parks and Trails Regional Trail Existing On Road Trail Community Park City Hall /Memorial Park Existing Ball Fields /School Property Existing Park (Private /Lion's Park) Golf Course ►� #��4 Proposed Parks and Trails Proposed County Bike Trail - Proposed On Road Trail Off Road Trail Off Road Trail outside 2030 Development Area - - -- Horseback Trail Proposed County Road 50 ■ Natural Gas Pipeline Easement Trail (Potential) OSP City Square OSP /Nature Park • ASA - Athletic Search Area Neighborhood Park Trailhead Search Area Greenway Corridor (Bonus Eligible Resource Corridor) *Proposed park and trails locations represent the general search areas for parks and trails.The City will work with developers and landowners to identify the exact location and size of parks and trail alignments as development or park acquisition is proposed. Updated October 2013 Adopted June 2011 Trails & Open Space Open Space = 39.6 acres Trail Outlot = -2.88 Acres Trails = -1.3 miles Sidewalks = - 2.0 miles Total Trails & Sidewalks = 3.3 miles CORCORAN MINNESOTA Sawgrass Development Development Open Space - 11.11.14- (1) PEACHTREE PARTNERS 00 Stantec 5 Minute Walk - 1/4 mile Includes 141 Homes (57 %) 10 Minute Walk - 1/2 mile Includes all 246 Homes (100 %) CORCORAN MINNESOTA Sawgrass Development Park Proximity - 11.11.14- PEACHTREE PARTNERS Stantec CORCORAN MINNESOTA Sawgrass Development Trail Exhibit - 11.11.1 4 - PEACHTREE PARTNERS Stantec Font Style Subject to Change r Sign Size = IS 0 —33' — Lettering with Lighting Weathered Steel SAWGRASS f w wtrete Cap 2. 3" Main Entrance Monument Detail Main Entrance Median Monument Detail Concrete Cap Weathered Steel with Development Logo Sign Area = 10 sf 3' 4 "— — Stone Lettering with Lighting 8' 8 Northwest Entry Monument Detail Main Entry Perspective MIN CORCORAN MINNESOTA Sawgrass Development Preliminary Sign Plan Sign Location Plan - 1 1.4.2014 - PEACHTREE PARTNERS Stantec • • • • L A N D From Site to Finish F Agenda Item: O R M • • • 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Suite 513 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 Minneapolis, MN 55401 www.landform.net TO: Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: November 10, 2014 for the November 18, 2014 Parks & Trails Commission Meeting RE: City- Initiated Ordinance Amendment regarding Park Dedication Requirements (City file 14 -007) 60 -DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: N/A 1. Request At the November 13th meeting, the City Council will consider changes to the park dedication ordinance and may direct staff to order a public hearing. If the Council directs staff to hold a public hearing at the December Planning Commission meeting, the Parks and Trails Commission should review and make a recommendation at the November 18th meeting. Staff will provide an update at the November 18th meeting, but we are providing the Commission with the same information provided to the City Council. The Council may make changes at their meeting. 2. Background There are a number of issues related to the park dedication ordinance that have been discussed over the last 6 months. A brief summary of the issues follows: a. On June 24th, the City Council directed staff to prepare revisions to the subdivision ordinance regarding park dedication. These are issues that affect current development proposals both in the MUSA and non -MUSA parts of Corcoran. Specifically, staff identified 3 issues that recently arose and identified a need for these ordinance revisions: Density, Trails and Park Dedication Fees. The Council agreed: (1) To change the density definition as proposed by staff to reflect the new definition changes in the ordinance and (2) Clarify that developers should be required to grade and provide ground cover for all trails within their development at their own cost, but that the cost of paving the trails should remain a city cost as outlined in the park dedication basis calculations. The City would then have the option of having the developer pave the trails within the development and providing park dedication credit for the cost of the paving or the City could pave the trails at a later date when trail connection or loop could be made. At that meeting, the Council had significant discussion about the assumptions in the original park dedication analysis. Council member Cossette had a number of concerns about how Landform , SensiblyCrecn® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. • • the former park planner calculated the ultimate cost of the system (which is the basis for the park dedication fees) and noted that he had several other concerns. The Council directed staff to meet directly with Council member Cossette to discuss his concerns. b. Staff met with Council member Cossette to discuss his concerns about the park dedication assumptions from former Parks Planner Buss and the effect of park dedication requirement on rural subdivisions. At the July 24th meeting, the Council directed staff to consider options that would reduce the park dedication requirements for the rural area, specifically related to land dedication, which the Council felt was unfairly onerous for rural subdivisions. The City Planner and City Attorney were directed to work to find a resolution. Due to a number of pressing development issues and other Council priorities, this work has not been completed and we recommend that the issue be addressed with the new Council in 2015. c. At the October 23rd meeting, the Council directed staff to research the park dedication history regarding subdivision requirements for existing parcels. The issue was raised by Council member Cossette in response to the Patnode Farms application and was also raised as part of the Triden Ridge 2nd Addition Plat in 2013. 3. Analysis Based on the Council feedback, staff recommends the changes shown on the attachment by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: Density In 2013, the City revised the ordinance definitions regarding density to create new definitions for "Density, Net (Pre - Development) ", which will be used to calculate fees for park dedication and trunk lateral area charges (TLAC) and "Density, Net (Post - Development) ", which would be used for the purpose of calculating density for the Metropolitan Council density goals. The park dedication ordinance should be updated to reflect this new definition as noted: Subd. 6. Area of Dedicated Land. Subdividers shall be required to dedicate to the City for park, trail and open space -the percentage of net land area or equivalent market value in cash identified below: Residential Land Uses Dedication Requirements: Land Use Category based on the Comprehensive Plan Units per acre (Density, Net - Pre- Percentage of land or equivalent market value in cash Development) Rural /Ag Residential Less than 3 10% Low Density Residential 3 -5 11% Medium - Density Residential 6 -8 12% Mixed Residential 8 -10 13% Ordinance Amendment for Sketch Plans November 18, 2014 2 • • High - Density 10+ 14% Residential and Mixed - Use Commercial and N/A 5% Industrial And A. Land Dedication. When land is to be dedicated to satisfy the park dedication requirement, separate lots or outlots shall be indicated on the plat drawings for the area(s) to be dedicated. Permanent trail easements may be allowed for dedication of trail corridors shown on the Parks and Trails Plan. Park dedication credit shall be given for the net acreage (pre - development) of these off -road trails, but no credit shall be given for trails within the public right -of -way. Such lots, outlots or easements shall be deeded to the City prior to the issuance of any building permits within the plat Trails The park dedication ordinance states that developers are responsible for dedicating easement for trails that are shown on the Comprehensive Plan and they will receive park dedication credit for the net acreage of required easements. The ordinance also states that "As part of their development contract or site plan approval responsibilities, owners and developers shall be responsible for making certain improvements to the developments for park, playground, trail and public open space purposes, including, but not limited to, finished grading and ground cover for all park, playground, trail and public open spaces within their developments. No credit toward the required dedication shall be given for this work." The draft now requires this dedication and no change to the language is proposed. The City Council has indicated that they will review individual applications regarding timing of the proposed trail paving. If the trails are self- contained within the development, they City may allow the developer to pave the trails as part of their development work and get reimbursed from the park dedication fund for the cost of the paving. Alternatively, the City Council may wish to pave the trails as a city project that will connect a variety of trail segments within the City. History of Park Dedication Requirements for Existing Parcels When the Patnode Farms plat was approved on September 25th, Council member Cossette questioned why park dedication was being required for Lot 1, Block 1, which was the parcel with the existing home. He raised the same issue on the Triden Ridge 2nd Addition application in November 2013. Staff noted that we had consulted with the City Attorney as part of the Triden Ridge 2nd Addition application and we believe that the ordinance language requires park dedication for new parcels (whether vacant or not) created by subdivision if they have not previously paid park dedication. We have good records from 2004 when the current ordinance was adopted; therefore, staff researched the subdivisions that have been approved since 2004. Ordinance Amendment for Sketch Plans 3 November 18, 2014 • • We first reviewed the park dedication language in Section 955.020, Subd. 1(A) of the Subdivision Ordinance. The current language was modified in 2005 (Ordinance 223 adopted 8/11/05) to read: A. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358, Subd. 2b, the City requires all subdividers as a prerequisite to approval of a final subdivision plat, land division or development of any land previously divided by plat, metes or bounds or any other means, which has not provided park dedication, to convey to the city or dedicate to the public use for park, playground, open space, or trail a reasonable portion of the land being platted, divided or developed as hereinafter specified. The portions to be dedicated will be approved by the City; or in lieu thereof the subdivider shall at the option of the city pay to the city, for use in the acquisition or development of public parks, playgrounds, or in debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes, an equivalent amount in cash based upon the undeveloped land value. Park Dedication is only due in cases where additional new parcels are created. Park dedication would not be due in situations where a replat or lot line adjustment is required to modify lot boundaries without creating any additional lots. At the time the language was modified, the staff report notes that "The language in Section 955.020, Subd. 1. is proposed to be amended to clarify that the park dedication requirements apply to all subdivisions, lot divisions and development of land that has not previously paid park dedication fees. This language will clarify an issue that was raised by an application who felt that the ordinance did not clearly require park dedication as part of a lot division." Staff found 50 final plats or lot divisions have been submitted since 2004: • 9 were either withdrawn or expired without being recorded. • 9 did not require park dedication because they were simply lot line adjustments with no new lots created or split off an outlot and park dedication on the outlot was deferred until the outlot is final platted as a lot. • 2 were not subject to park dedication requirements because they were public projects. • 13 were vacant parcels. Park dedication was required for all new lots. Park dedication was deferred on outlots until platted. In the case of commercial subdivisions, park dedication would be due with the building permit. • 15 plats had existing homes and required park dedication for new vacant lots only. No park dedication was required for new parcels that included existing homes. • 2 plats required park dedication for new parcels that included existing homes (Triden Ridge Second Addition and Patnode Farms). The Triden applicants have filed the plat and paid the $3,000 park dedication fee, but Patnode has not. It is clear that there is some inconsistency in how the City has been applying the ordinance. The ordinance requires park dedication where new parcels are created but, prior to 2013, only vacant new parcels were required to pay park dedication. New parcels for existing homes have been exempted. The only time that the City can collect park dedication on parcels is when the property is subdivided. The way the ordinance language is written, it appears that all lots created by subdivision that had not Ordinance Amendment for Sketch Plans 4 November 18, 2014 • • previously paid park dedication are required to pay park dedication (regardless of whether or not they are vacant). However, the City has the discretion to revise this policy. • The Commission should make a recommendation to the City Council on whether they wish to treat subdivisions with existing homes differently from subdivisions of vacant land. • The City must consider that a parcel may be subdivided to create a lot with an existing home that could be torn down and a new home built for the same or a new resident. Once the land is platted, the City cannot require park dedication. If the Commission wishes to collect park dedication only for new parcels that do not have an existing home, we recommend changing the ordinance as follows: Subd. 1. Dedication of Land or Cash A. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358, Subd. 2b, the City requires all subdividers as a prerequisite to approval of a final subdivision plat, land division or development of any land previously divided by plat, metes or bounds or any other means, which has not provided park dedication, to convey to the City or dedicate to the public use for park, playground, open space, or trail a reasonable portion of the land being platted, divided, or developed as hereinafter specified. The portions to be dedicated will be approved by the City; or in lieu thereof the subdivider shall at the option of the City pay to the City, for use in the acquisition or development of public parks, playgrounds, or in debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes, an equivalent amount in cash based upon the undeveloped land value. Park Dedication is only due in cases where additional new buildable parcels are created. Park dedication would not be due in situations where a replat or lot line adjustment is required to modify lot boundaries without creating any additional lots or where lots are created for existing homes. Staff finds that the current language "Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358, Subd. 2b, the City requires all subdividers as a prerequisite to approval of a final subdivision plat, land division or development of any land previously divided by plat, metes or bounds or any other means, which has not provided park dedication, to convey to the City or dedicate to the public use for park, playground, open space, or trail a reasonable portion of the land being platted, divided, or developed as hereinafter specified." seems clear that anyone who has not previously paid park dedication will pay dedication for any lots created as part of a subdivision (whether or not they have an existing home); therefore, no change is needed if that is the Commission's intent. Summary Staff will provide an update on the November 1 31h Council direction at the Parks and Trails Commission meeting. Ordinance Amendment for Sketch Plans 5 November 18, 2014 • • 4. Requested Action a. Review the draft ordinance amendments and recommend approval of the ordinance as drafted. Attachments a. Draft Ordinance Approving Changes b. Draft Resolution Approving Findings of Fact Ordinance Amendment for Sketch Plans 6 November 18, 2014 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2014- Motion By: Seconded By: December xx, 2014 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendments. The text of Section 955.020 of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 1. Dedication of Land or Cash AND Subd. 6. A. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358, Subd. 2b, the City requires all subdividers as a prerequisite to approval of a final subdivision plat, land division or development of any land previously divided by plat, metes or bounds or any other means, which has not provided park dedication, to convey to the City or dedicate to the public use for park, playground, open space, or trail a reasonable portion of the land being platted, divided, or developed as hereinafter specified. The portions to be dedicated will be approved by the City; or in lieu thereof the subdivider shall at the option of the City pay to the City, for use in the acquisition or development of public parks, playgrounds, or in debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes, an equivalent amount in cash based upon the undeveloped land value. Park Dedication is only due in cases where additional new buildable parcels are created. Park dedication would not be due in situations where a replat or lot line adjustment is required to modify lot boundaries without creating any additional lots or where lots are created for existing homes. Area of Dedicated Land. Subdividers shall be required to dedicate to the City for park, trail and open space -the percentage of net land area or equivalent market value in cash identified below: Residential Land Uses Dedication Requirements: Land Use Category based on the Comprehensive Plan Units per acre (Density. Net - Pre- Percentage of land or equivalent market value in cash Development) Rural /Ag Residential Less than 3 10% Page 1 of 3 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2014- December xx, 2014 Low Density Residential 3 -5 11% Medium - Density Residential 6 -8 12% Mixed Residential 8 -10 13% High- Density Residential and Mixed -Use 10+ 14% Commercial and Industrial N/A 5% AND Subd. 7. Land Dedication /Payment of Fees A. Land Dedication. When land is to be dedicated to satisfy the park dedication requirement, separate lots or outlots shall be indicated on the plat drawings for the area(s) to be dedicated. Permanent trail easements may be allowed for dedication of trail corridors shown on the Parks and Trails Plan. Park dedication credit shall be given for the net acreage (pre - development) of these off -road trails, but no credit shall be given for trails within the public right -of -way. Such lots, outlots or easements shall be deeded to the City prior to the issuance of any building permits within the plat B. Installation of Improvements. As part of their development contract or site plan approval responsibilities, owners and developers shall be responsible for making certain improvements to the developments for park, playground, trail and public open space purposes, including, but not limited to, finished grading and ground cover for all park, playground, trail and public open spaces within their developments. No credit toward the required dedication shall be given for this work. C. Cash fee. When a cash fee is to be paid in lieu of land dedication, the payment of such fee shall be required as follows: 1. For residential developments, the fee shall be paid prior to the City's release of the signed final plat mylars for recording with Hennepin County. 2. For commercial and industrial developments the fee shall be paid prior to issuance of any building permits within the subdivision. 3. Park dedication is required for all newly created lots or parcels. Park dedication is not due for parcels that have previously paid park dedication (land or cash -in- lieu). Page 2 of 3 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2014- December xx, 2014 SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. VOTING AYE Guenthner, Ken n Asleson, Rich n Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat n Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY Guenthner, Ken n Asleson, Rich n Cossette, Tom Hank, Pat n Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this xxx day of December 2014. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 3 of 3 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014- Motion By: Seconded By: XXX, 2014 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran initiated an amendment to update the City Code to address changes to the park dedication requirements; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards and City policies; and WHEREAS, the amendment would allow help to ensure that the park dedication policy allows the City to implement the adopted parks and trails plan; WHEREAS, the Parks and Trails Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called public meeting and recommends approval; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Subdivision Ordinance text amendment, based upon the finding that the proposed amendments would be consistent with State law and the City's Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City Code. VOTING AYE Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich n Cossette, Tom n Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY Guenthner, Ken Asleson, Rich n Cossette, Tom n Hank, Pat Thomas, Ron Page 1 of 2 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014- XXX, 2014 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this xx day of December 2014. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 2 of 2 City Seal This page has intentionally been left blank 9a. CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 — Office 763.420.6056 — Fax E -mail - cieneral(@.ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us MEMO Meeting Date: November 18, 2014 To: Parks and Trails Commission From: Brad Martens, City Administrator Re: City Council Report The Parks and Trails Commission last met on October 21, 2014. The following is a recap of some of the items discussed at City Council meetings since that time. A full recap can be found by reviewing the approved City Council minutes on the website. At the time of this report the November 13, 2014 meeting had not yet taken place. An update from that meeting will take place at the Parks and Trails Commission meeting. October 23, 2014 • Mobile Hope Reimbursement Plan o Directed staff to obtain a fundraising progress report from Mobile Hope. • Hope Center Pay Request o Approved the first pay request for the Hope Center in the amount of $43,700. • City Councilor Request — Park Dedication Ordinance o Directed staff to begin work to update a specific section of the park dedication ordinance. • Public Hearing — Foxline Drive and Treeline Drive Paving Project o Heard from nine residents who spoke at the hearing. The consistent message was that the assessment was too high and that Trail Haven should be paved first. After significant discussion the Council decided to not move forward with plans and specifications necessary for the paving to take place. o Council did however direct staff to work with Public Works to improve a few areas of Trail Haven; report back on the cost difference between 9a. maintaining a gravel road vs. a collector road; and to continue the discussion on the plan to pave gravel collector roads. • Recycling Proposal o Reviewed proposals for recycling services. After discussion related to cost and timing of contract a motion was adopted rejecting all bids and direction for staff to rebid. • Conditional Offer — Public Safety Director o Approved a conditional offer to Matt Gottschalk for the Position of Public Safety Director effective December 1, 2014. • City Council Resignation and Declaration of a Vacancy o Accepted the resignation of Diane Lynch and declared a vacancy. o Discussed possible successors and appointed Pat Hank to fill out the term through 2016. Pat will take the oath at the November 13`h meeting. Attachment: N/A CITY OF CORCORAN PARK CAPITAL FUND REPORT November 12, 2014 CASH FUNDS Date Park Dedication 1 Memorial Park Maintenance Beginning Balance 2014 354,879.24 9,165.22 Jan -14 Park Dedication (Mattson) 3,000.00 Mar -14 Interest earned 1.13 Apr -14 Stone & Steel (Brick Replace) (24.99) Jun -14 Chelsea Cay (270.00) Jun -14 Lawn King (220.00) Jun -14 Milbrandt Donation 5,000.00 Jun -14 Interest earned 1.14 Jul -14 Lawn King (660.00) Jul -14 Chelsea Cay (370.00) Jul -14 Chelsea Cay (100.00) Jul -14 Chelsea Cay (140.00) Jul -14 Chelsea Cay (319.78) Jul -14 Chelsea Cay (395.00) Aug -14 Memorial Stone 100.00 Sep -14 Chelsea Cay (70.00) Sep -14 Grove Nursery (258.70) Sep -14 Interest earned 1.50 Sep -14 Chelsea Cay (342.00) 2014 YTD ACTIVITY 3,075.01 1,858.29 ENDING BALANCE 357,954.25 11,023.51 368,977.76 1 of 2 CITY OF CORCORAN FARMERS STATE SAVINGS November 12, 2014 Savings Date Expense Interest Revenue Balance 3/2013 5.26 10,184.51 8/2013 Garden Maintenance (287.50) 9,897.01 6/2013 5.32 9,902.33 9/2013 1.65 9,903.98 10/2013 Garden Maintenance (430.00) 9,473.98 10/2013 Garden Maintenance (310.00) 9,163.98 12/2013 1.24 9,165.22 3/2014 1.13 9,166.35 6/2014 Chelsea Cay (270.00) 8,896.35 6/2014 Lawn King (220.00) 8,676.35 6/2014 Milbrandt Donation 5,000.00 13,676.35 6/2014 Interest earned 1.14 13,677.49 7/2014 Lawn King (660.00) 13,017.49 7/2014 Chelsea Cay (370.00) 12,647.49 7/2014 Chelsea Cay (100.00) 12,547.49 7/2014 Chelsea Cay (140.00) 12,407.49 7/2014 Chelsea Cay (319.78) 12,087.71 7/2014 Chelsea Cay (395.00) 11,692.71 9/2014 Chelsea Cay (70.00) 11,622.71 9/2014 Grove Nursery (258.70) 11,364.01 9/2014 Interest earned 1.50 11,365.51 10/2014 Chelsea Cay (342.00) 11,023.51 TOTAL $ (5,737.64) $ 220.21 $ 16,540.94 $ 11,023.51