Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-07-24 - Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Corcoran City Council July 24, 2014 - 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order/ Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval 4. Open Forum 5. Presentations a. Years of Service Recognition — John Hamilton and Ryan Burns* 6. Consent Agenda a. Draft Minutes of July 10, 2014 Council Meeting* b. Resolution 2014 -42, St Thomas Church Temporary Gambling permit* c. Resolution 2014 -43, NW Area Jaycees Temporary 3.2 Liquor license* d. 2012 Sewer/Water Utility Project Pay Request (retainage release)* 7. Claims as Presented * a. Escrow Claims (Fund #500) b. All Other Financial Claims 8. Staff Reports / Memos /Commissions a. Planning Update* b. Code Compliance* c. Financial Performance Report* 9. Planning Business / Landform a. City- Initiated Park Dedication Ordinance Update (city file 14 -007)* b. Lake Independence Regional Trailhead at 23475 CR 10 Rezoning, Site Plan and Variance (PID 18- 119 -23 -12 -0002) (city file 14 -010)* c. Mike Patnode Topographic Survey and Wetland Delineation Waiver at 22610 CR 50 (PID 20- 119 -23 -43 -0003) (city file 14 -014)* d. Public Hearing Notice Memo* 10. Unfinished Business a. Ordinance Regulating Public Sanitary Sewer and Water Within the City of Corcoran* 11. New Business a. Resolution 2014 -44 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 20146* b. Feasibility Studies for Schendel (transportation, stormwater, utilities)* c. Draft 2015 Budget* d. Request for Proposals — Residential Recycling Services* 12. Unscheduled Items 13. Review of Upcoming Council Meeting Agenda 14. Council Calendar Planning Commission 08/07/14 09/04/14 10/02/14 11/06/14 12/04/14 Thomas Guenthner Asleson Lynch Cossette Parks and Trails Commission 08/19/14 09/16/14 10/21/14 11/18114 12/16/14 Guenthner Asleson Lynch Cossette Thomas 15. Adjournment Agenda Corcoran City Council July 24, 2014 - 7:00 PM *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet by Door. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item. 5a. Council Meeting: Prepared By: July 24, 2014 Brad Martens Topic: Action Required: Years of Service Recognition — John Presentation Hamilton and Ryan Burns Summary: In May of this year, two City of Corcoran employees passed significant employment milestones: • Corporal Ryan Burns, 20 years of service • Lieutenant John Hamilton, 25 years of service In recognition of their years of service, Corporal Ryan Burns and Lieutenant John Hamilton will be presented with a token of appreciation. Financial /Budget: N/A Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being, and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost - effective, and friendly manner. PROFESSIONALISM We believe that continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism and are committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and the development of our employees. Recommendation: Present Lieutenant Hamilton and Corporal Burns with a token of appreciation in recognition of their years of service to the City of Corcoran. Council Action: Present Lieutenant Hamilton and Corporal Burns with a token of appreciation in recognition of their years of service to the City of Corcoran. Attachments: N/A City of Corcoran City Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2014 — 7:00 PM 6a. The Corcoran City Council met on July 10, 2014, at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were, Mayor Guenthner, Councilor Asleson, Councilor Cossette, and Councilor Lynch. Councilor Thomas arrived at 7:21 pm. Also present were City Administrator Martens, City Engineer VanderTop, Director of Public Safety Gormley, and City Clerk Heinecke. Mayor Guenthner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval No motion made, Mayor Guenthner asked if all approved the agenda. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Lynch, and Cossette 4. Open Forum Ken Guenthner 6315 Butterworth Ln, spoke to council about a bee club and possible interest in forming a club in Corcoran. Spoke further to the policy related to civic center rental fee and the need to formalize a use policy. Mayor Guenthner will pay the fee. Council directed staff to draft a civic center use policy. 5. Presentations -None 6. Consent Agenda a. Draft Minutes of June 26, 2014 Council Meeting b. Authorizing Agreement with Hennepin County (CDBG) Resolution 2014 -34 Motion: made by Asleson, seconded by Cossette to approve the agenda as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, and Lynch (Motion carried 4:0) 7. Claims as Presented a. Escrow Claims (Fund #500) Motion: made by Cossette, seconded by Lynch to approve escrow claims as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, and Lynch (Motion carried 4:0) b. All Other Financial Claims Motion: made by Cossette, seconded by Asleson to approve all other financial claims as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, and Lynch (Motion carried 4:0) 8. Staff Reports/ Memos /Commissions a. Fire Marshal Duties report received, no action required. 9. Planning Business / None 10. Unfinished Business a. Ordinance Regulating Public Sanitary Sewer and Water Within the City of Corcoran. Council discussed and returned to staff. b. SE District Sewer and Water Improvement Bids report by City Administrator Martens. Motion: made by Cossette, seconded by Thomas to approve Resolution 2014 -38 "Authorizing Awarding of a Contract for 2014 SE District Sewer and Water Improvement Project" Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Lynch, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) 11. New Business City of Corcoran City Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2014 — 7:00 PM 6a. a. Response to Petition and Proposal to Pave Roads in the Treeline /Foxline /Trail Haven Neighborhood report by City Administrator Martens. Council discussed and advised the broad topic of city road projects will be discussed at the August 14, 2014 council meeting. b. County Road 10 Turnback report by City Administrator Martens. Council discussed, no action required. c. Commission Ordinance Review report by City Administrator Martens. Council discussed and directed staff to draft updates to the commission ordinances. d. Options for Video Recording City Council Meetings report by City Administrator Martens. Council discussed and directed staff to incorporate costs into the 2015 budget. e. Resolution 2014 -37 Providing for the Issuance and Sale of Bonds report by City Administrator Martens. Chuck Lymangood 8105 Co Rd 116, addressed the $250,000 portion of the bond sale by asking how many sites to date are currently serviced by sewer in the city? Mr. Lymangood spoke of his main concern related to wording of the staff report, the bonding itself, and the status of the proposed bond related to the existing facility bond. Council discussed. Motion: made by Asleson, seconded by Thomas to approve Resolution 2014 -37 "Resolution Providing for the Issuance and Sale of Approximately $3,140,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B" as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Lynch, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) Motion: made by Thomas, seconded by Lynch to adjourn. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Lynch and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:05 pm. i Jeanie Heinecke — City Clerk City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -42 July 24, 2014 .. Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHARITABLE GAMBLING IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran that the following Charitable Gambling License is granted effective for the dates as indicated, to the following Licensee, provided appropriate application and insurance documents are submitted and satisfactory background check completed by the Corcoran Police Department. LICENSEE LICENSE LICENSE EFFECTIVE DATE St. Thomas The Apostle Charitable Gambling August 17, 2014 (One day license) VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 24th day of July 2014. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke, City Clerk Ken Guenthner, Mayor Page 1 of 1 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -43 July 24, 2014 6c. MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING TEMPORARY ON -SALE 3.2% MALT LIQUOR LICENSE IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran that the following Liquor License is granted effective for the dates as indicated, to the following Licensee, provided appropriate application and insurance documents are submitted and satisfactory background check completed by the Corcoran Police Department. LICENSEE LICENSE LICENSE EFFECTIVE DATE Northwest Area Jaycee's On -sale 3.2% malt liquor August 15 — 16, 2014 Corcoran Country Daze VOTING AYE VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron ❑ Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 8th day of July 24, 2014. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke, Clerk Kenneth Guenthner, Mayor Page 1 of 1 City Seal Wenck TO: Brad Martens, City Administrator FROM: Kent Torve, P.E., Heather Libby P.E. DATE: June 18, 2014 SUBJECT: Sewer and Water Pay Request No. 5 Council Action Requested Approve Pay Request No. 5 in the amount of $ 34,961.74 Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Ctr. P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 Fax (763) 479 -4242 E -mail: wenckmp @wenck.com Proiect Update A retainage of 5% for the project has been withheld. A majority of the work is complete. This pay request is reducing the overall retainage to remain at 2 %. all] 1411 OWNER: City of Corcoran PROJECT: Corcoran Sewer and Water Utility Project CONTRACTOR: SR Weidema: 17600 113th Ave N, Maple Grove, MN 55369 PAY ESTIMATE NO. 5 Original Contract Amount (with Maple Grove water) .............. ............................... $ 1,171054.30 Contract Changes approved to Date (Change Order 1, 2, 3) ..... ..............................$ (- 7,664.75) RevisedContract Price .............................................................. ..............................$ 1,165,389.55 Work Completed to Date (see attached) .................................... ..............................$ 1,165,391.49 Retainage to Date (reduced to 2 %) ............................................ ..............................$ 23,307.83 Work Completed to Date less Retainage to Date ...................... ..............................$ 1,165,391.49 Total Amount Previously Certified ........................................... ..............................$ 1,065,391.49 Payment Request This Estimate ................................................ ..............................$ 34,961.74 CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid. I hereby certify that the work and the materials supplied to date, as shown on the request for payment, represents the actual value of accomplishment under the terms of the contract dated July 17, 2012 between CITY OF CORCORAN (OWNER) and SR WEIDEMA (CONTRACTOR) and all authorized changes thereto. CONTRACTOR A-zff 6L-,� Date (� Title CCI`N Qc- V` ad L l�' Approval: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. taW Date June 18, 2014 Kenton C. Torve, P.E. CITY OF CORCORAN Date 00530 -1 Payment Request Form T :\2294 - Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \07 - Construction \pay requests \pay request 5.doe I 0 rya (D I 0 Trmlo to to IQ to IQ to to ob --j m CA w 8UI) 8 (D w- I m ul 45 (A IQ lb 0 0 1 > z 1\2 02 Ct Ch (rl G zn 81 ZS rn > C) 7, a) a co C) < - -0 - -0 - -0 - -0 - -u - -a - -u -0 -u -u -0 t -0 -0 -0 -u -0 -0 -0 -0 > — C/) 5�; > 5F> C-) < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 1 MITI c C)()Mm MX-00000000000000000000 c r- > --I > x ;u =5 �2 12 M :2 :2 -p :2 �2 :2 -2 :2 :p :2 :2 -2 :2 �2 :9 �2 r- m 07\> �a M M M TI M -U --a T m m m T T -0 -0 -0 _0 -0 m -0 m > > M.G)M-<M-�, mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm zz CO ro _0 -ci f, cnzn m ;�-, >:�MffIMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM m (0 < < 0 Cl) U 0 E��: �F z m j:(Dr- T m :E V;ammmmmmr-nrpmmrnmmmmmmmm X ;a C) 0 0 6 1 F- > tj (:) �u W �Cl �u �O x x �O x �u �u �u 1�0 �a a m �u .70 �a :O x 0 T Um z m 0 0 C -,--1 z u 000000000000010000000 > M N u x x u x �u x x x 0 u T m m 0 T�x x 2: 0 0 :�> -P to G) N) " 9) to m IQ G) to m " m to w 111) m IQ p I'l) p to IQ rQ Nj w w cn W (J) w (D < M < m m �u -0) 0.) w -U) (.1) - to IQ - M - to to - - P) - p - p - p C:) -cp 70 X M (Y) 0) 11 N (D N (5) :0 CO GO I) w U) w w w to IV to to CD in C.) C) 0 IQ -f� CA O� J�- K-) C� Q� Q? t� G? 4�� m 70 m -a 0 -Tj rn rr -n -n F- C) < M F- -Ti M F- -n M F- -T-I - r-n r- -n f- - r- r- -n r- -Ti r- rTi -n F- -n r- -n r- -n r- -q F- -n F- -ii r- -n f- -q r- -it r- -n > > > n�- n IN" fo -1 --4 C, -t" CD C� C; (UOI (—C) w to CD (.JI -1 w cn :i Ul C:) — (.0 Cl) z 00 CD ro CD 3 0 0 --4 (0 C::, to _4 N) (D (D LD lo C) 4--- K) cU 1�0 6q E.9 V) Cn e4 EA e-) 469 ��A E,9 EA � G4 Gq F9 kj to bg £0 69 69 1-A 4' J, O p O p -t, , :N .01 m to to 11) to to co m w co CD C) 0 CD (D CD (D 0 (D 6 (D C. C) C) 0, O d d CD CD CD ED 0 (D C) (D (D m C.) CD (DICD C) (D (D C) (D C, CD C) C) C) (D. d O ci G) G) 0) G) (D (D CD (D 199 69 1 69 cq 16n (R En 69 41�q 'En C19 69 Qfl -20 &9 � -(A fA 69 E3) fA ffi 69 69 69 0 -P, to CP to Cl) -li G) - 0) (\)-31 IN) � ;�� E�. P, cn w bi 07 1,-) - (j, - M -C) -tl - C� - (D - G) -4 -�, . (D -WM (C) -1(10-) -I -M M CO -0) W -:i K) CTI -5� CD -r- -(y) t. W -4 I� co �D CD 0 (rl C) lo CD C) (D CD 't�, w C) C) to C) ca 111) -j to O w co w C, CD 41 0 (D CD CD CD (D 0 0 CD C) C) Q CD C, C) C3 CD CO CD CD i\J 6 W C) CD (D O CD CD 0) CD C) CD 0 C) C)jC)jC)j(D Cl CD CD C) CD (D CD C) da. CD C) CD ID Iml (aD C, CD CD ED (D 0 C) 0 Q Q Q C) C) C) CD C) C) C, C) C) C) CD O CD CD C) (D 0 0 C) CD C) C) C-) CD ID (D CD CD C. (D C) C) C> CD C) CD CD CD C) C7 CD C) cn 0 0 CD C. <D (D (D m IS9 E9 H3 6ri 69 Fn 1 n bR 4clq IG9 � lb ? 'E19 E:R 6r) EFl ES) d3A En (11 flq 'A fA C-o tfb Ef, Ef3 ll3 klq > rn 0') to w 4-11 co --1 01 Cyl 41 N) ?I w - fo C) CD C) --j 41 cn -4 (D (C) C11 C11 Cl to C', CO C, 0 ID p CO ID 00 -1 ID 0 (D C, W CD -Ll- FQ (D 0 CD C� 6 CD (D a C) 'CD 83 S SD (D (D S C) CD (D (D Sl S C) C) c:, - CD CD 0 C) (D C) (D . . . CS 0 S S . CS, 0' CS, C) C) I 0 (10 01 () 01 1-n cl4 4j7 Q:) EA 64 1A <19 - <1"3 _ kle ffl G9 E9 (11) E0 Efl (D ffl f.9 fA CA S�- cn m m J, t, 81) m - - m - - - C. - - cn - - m - (-n N) C3 Po z, 'D CD m -,1 4-- co "0 -1 'D 0n to cn C) -P 4,-- C, Cat C) CD CO (0 ID C) C) m C, CD C) w 03 C) CD C) , F) C> 0 G O p w p Cl p co N UQ p CD p co Ili N -1 Ili CD In (11 (.0 CO' to C) (D C) (D C) Cl CD CD 0 a C� CD CD 0 (D CD ID M C) W 0 CD C) 0 C) C) C�l C) C, C) 1�t CD C> CD C� --- 0 C) C� -, CD — 0 — CD O P I 0 rya (D I 0 T. 01 '--1 m (n .15, W N � O) CTl .p w N -i jjJ-1 W Cn d" W N - ® (� CA V 0) (A, A. W t �? LCfi?>C)G)= JO iC >S -O CZD C f,�7JOAm 0 -ocn � t? � rn6 -Or CIC ? co tmi=::I7j co OD :I 0 G67 0 -i 0 N� �>z va'o'h� � Oil ^ <�07 z� bmW n J3 � m m0 >W t 0 os�mmm t��7 D � -A _0 > m �I m� C)--1 -mGi a C� �� 1 7i< n�tr M 0 � r° 7> r - C) -a7 O 3> i> T �) Q -n m r (71 r ��m co s D y 0m �,0C) m- c) mC 2�2zC)- Z0 m oC)-�.1 sU,m� M n ' Ci ?, C)O� � o G) -a Fm h� m tai r 0 � � _t , rrU) 0;)m C) s C7 � co Us e) U) F- > -0 C) ;u < � rn a �7 7J EE S > D > mp 0 i3 s7r O �Cm W r m m -iGyxm >Zz O O 0 M m �' A -02 N O OT w��cn az'Cr� �m -10� u ci �O 0>�T s Z c�-I D Cl) -I -1- m F,a MMDZF <OC) m m < uImm -z- > cn0m�<: C0 0 C� m7.)0� C)c00 m0O (n0= sp=a < -0 s ),mC�mrCD rn mo -O --:jw -1-rm sf -rnm00< TmmS 0(A @M 0 X co Z z�cno r O o i C7 , G) OC C) m�°0 ®O 0 D rn m m co ti7'1 �7 --I0 0 p m u ���V1a rn z O ' m `° �0C o PO M A m aj o�m�� U ? ) O O < m� C)r0 x -O� 1, 7 � z 0 m o> 0 =j�M07 mz r- r- O smm o rn <m — — fn rr fl icri�tri�crnri�tntnrr -n mrnnf -rrr ® mrrnmrnrf Y > m -n-n t- C)a -<-: n nis�7J�7 i1Cncnus rn `I CD C-4 O f•`? = = O O -� t tV �! (J, O N 4 d (5) - = 63 'T- - = (n N N W O O O 69 09 fA tF) FA qrlq { 9 6q £9 £f3 &-i Gq (i b� ! s £�9 64 L3 £:� Cfl L-A F13 !i3 fH En ffl 6`) b9 fin 64 n Lfl f-f3 = -P U( N (,O O� _ .P IJ O -s (n -4 U , W N W (O (n Cat Cl) V O -s -R (n O C) O d O O 03 (n w -4 O O N C) V O O O O O O O IJ N m V co G-) Cl) CO -=• CO cnMC:) 3 ooO cn no= cnt-)wrnoPoc�- O pcs, w fv OOr� n a O O O C) O C) C) C) N fn C) 0 C) 0 0(D 0 O Cn O O (D O C) W -* O O N O -i Cn m Q d O (D O 0 O (D O -ice. (.n O O O O O O 6 O 0 0 0 0 CD 0 O O 0 (D C) C) C) O :fl 4fl EA fA dr`s {A Ea E¢) f}) ffl C-R Ef3 Efl f#) C3-) EFs fz) fA 69 fF) ffl EA ffa b'3 49 log N7 b9 -G4 69 (Gti W N 03 W 41 . �? = O a) co (n W V O Orn -¢ Cp 1J (n 0 O 0 O 0 t)'7 W O W (g O N 6) --a 1 -.1 6) (n W 0 W C)) ® 0 N 0 N 0 (n 0 - (0 O O O C) N ca3 V C� -Cl) (3) 0 -co C) V 0 6) O V N -_ LtJ O K) (n O N 0 O (:::, C 0) In Vi =- O W ;a (0 C7 0 0 0 tO 0 0 (n Pa) Js. O O O O d O d (n O C;, 0 C) 0 0 0 001 0 0 C3 0 O 0 (D 0 C) 0 co 0 07 0 O 0 O (D O (D C) co O O O W O C) O 1 O 1 O C) C) W 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 41 O O O O (D O C) O O O O 0 C] 0 O (D I O L7 O O O O 0 c) 0 O O d d- O 0 0 0 0 0 O O C7 (O 0 C) 0 C7 0 O 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C) C7 O O O CD O 0 O 0 O Cs O CCD) 0 O 0 O 0 G) C) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 Ca 0 O 0 c) 0 <D Cl O 0 0 Cl 0 0 d 0 E() Cin b9 b3 b9 fR fA f1) (f3 fF CA fo 69 1.9 £fi b9 69 1--a fn fA fA fA fA Fn (f) E» C#9 fA -E�9 L`9 (114 co Q) b4 4r3 - O ® O O N -� -3 O O N O -• -� -� O _ N V 67 O O N tV (J) -1, G,7 O -�- CO N -� !� W O -�. -_ .� -* cn IV Co tV CO C) C ) CJ 0 d 0 p 0[ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 6 0 0 0 O O O O d O Cn O O O d O C3 O C) O O O O 0 C) 0 61 (n N (n O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 d O CO Q 0 O 0 O 6 O 0 G 0 O 0 G 414 'cfl G9 d3 -&9 f1) (A 69 b9 Et) ft3 , {fl fA fig fA <fl LA G9 £A 69 69 Sy9 69 kr9 En b9 fn m €t) f n <-A E9 6i b9 -b`) _E19 f7 .a Q. �. -� 0 O m (O cn co -1 O N O cu N c), C.) O 0 C) 0 41. (0 W O w (0 O N 0) --* V 'J m (n Cl) O -1 V (D O N O (O C_'l N (o O (J) O O (D C) N N mW (D O) -1 (D C5 G) 0 M O WO O N -1 V N -� a4 O N Ct, O C) (7 Cl O O W Cn (11 CA = 0 Oo dw ca O d (n O -R O O (n (f7 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C> O O O d 0 C7 CJ CD O 0 Cr ) 0 0 { 4 co C) CO O O O O O 0 C) 0 CO 0 O 0 CO 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U, O O CD CO C? O O O 0 C] 0 O 1 O 0 O 0 O 0 &MAINIMINIIII&IN . m=mmllll E== I -MMIMMEMEN - I mm P-1 i i Ul 0 0 Co Ci `J 0 M ()1 to U1 A U1 W V7 Ct1 Cii O c m 0 > m -+ r m O �# 0 tea 0000 tl8 cfi tta 0 tfi �i 0 E M m -O- 0 Cn N n�mx -n a -I O -O C Cn O ca w - �X _ � -imzm 09 0 * M-i fil >rnm -r in rn m cn � � � m � �J > (Z)- r N w m C O r m� 000- cmi5 imx co xa:c)G) o co O C15 iv u1 c, (3) �INOCaoaZ d 0 0 0 0 -IOOO d 0 0 Ef3 ff? b'S C13 I cic� 00 G`3 69 cR b4 b4 m -TI =' -I o � O �m r- c po CD (:1 m O O O m m 0 z�� ( -(1) Wm o -0 O O O O O m mm 00 CU Ut OJ �N()C -)b -mi zO 0 m O 0 0 0 O (D G70V5 U7 a cH cn U) m�m��m ff1 '^J. Om Efi cfD 67 b4 t�1 b9 b'? EA G) ft4 - 0("i, O P°n�� W w ha (`J Ul fI�,QLdr,mM w -o C«,y N Ln 0 O N (.0 W N Ol O 4? C37 N 05 C/? CJ (p CD m -m��rd Ul p' c* 73 > -i < rn N O OJ d -+ N O O d 2: €,aJ -r � C m O C51 w-tN O d C1 - t�rnNWw O�! 1 O b V co 07 w 4N, Ul G U (D O N) C) co C> tJ iD W N Ol o 0) (n N 67 CJ C4 I t€i z � O 0 O 07 — V N O OJ d O 'J O d O � CI c < i, N 69 U1 h3 O O O (51 (n O O O co .� C3 C1 M O 0 0 d O O O O O O d O d mCrrS? �>� ��C- &MAINIMINIIII&IN . m=mmllll E== I -MMIMMEMEN - I mm P-1 � G) CD (Z)- Go N w W co 03 o co O C15 iv u1 c, (3) �INOCaoaZ d 0 0 0 0 -IOOO d 0 0 Ef3 ff? b'S C13 G`3 69 cR b4 b4 Ul N O b CD (:1 O1 O O O O CTS C3 C5 CA O O O O O w CU Ut OJ (J O O® 0 0 O 0 0 0 O (D U7 a cH cn U) cfl ff1 '^J. Efi cfD f» b4 t�1 b9 b'? EA G) ft4 - O W w ha (`J Ul -P w C«,y Ln CA O N (.0 W N Ol O 4? C37 N 05 O CJ (p CD m Ul Cl 1 0) -1 N O OJ d -+ N O O d €,aJ N Cb C51 w-tN O d C1 - t�rnNWw O�! 1 O b V co 07 w 4N, Ul G U (D O N) C) co C> tJ iD W N Ol o 0) N 67 CJ C4 t€i U) O (5) O 07 0`i V N O OJ d O 'J O d O i, N 69 U1 h3 O O O (51 (n O O O co .� C3 C1 M O 0 0 d O O O O O O d O d &MAINIMINIIII&IN . m=mmllll E== I -MMIMMEMEN - I mm P-1 G) CD (Z)- O CO Q N O C> CO d 0 0 Q d 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 Ef3 ff? b'S C13 G`3 69 cR b4 b4 b9 b9 b4 $A b9 b9 b9 b9 w CU Ut OJ (J O U1 N U7 (A V G) W °J 6 '^J. w 'al N --k .rte 0a N G) W - O W w €sd (`J Ul -P w C«,y Ln CA O N (.0 W N Ol O 4? C37 N 05 O CJ (p CD -P (0 Cl 1 0) -1 N O OJ d -+ O O d C51 N O d O O�! 1 O b V co 07 w 4N, Ul G U O N Ol O Ul C7 O O f C Ct O O 0 N 67 CJ C4 t€i CD O 03 O= Q O O O O d O d d G3 O MEMORANDUM PATE.. ............... O T .............. .C......0 ........ FRO ............... M RE June 17, 2014 .............. ............................... Brad Martens Agenda Item i • i • L A N D F O R M From Site to Finish • 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Council. Plannina Commission. Parks & Trails Commission Kendra Lindahl, City Planner ........................................................................................ ............................... Active Corcoran Planninq Applications The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: • Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 www.landform.net 1. City- Initiated Park Dedication Ordinance Update (City File 14 -007). At the April 10th meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare a minor update to the park dedication ordinance as outlined in the staff memo. Staff provided a draft to the City Council for review at the June 26th meeting and, based on Council feedback has met with Councilmember Cossette to gather his comments. These comments will require significantly more research and analysis than originally anticipated and will not be ready for a public hearing until this fall. We will provide an update at the July 24th meeting. 2. City- Initiated Ordinance Update for Sketch Plans (City file 14 -009). At the April 10th meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance update to streamline the sketch plan review process and require Council action only. Staff provided a draft to the City Council for review at the June 26th meeting and, based on Council feedback will schedule a public hearing at the Planning Commission and Council review in August. 3. Lake Independence Regional Trailhead at 23475 CR 10 Rezoning, Site Plan and Variance (PID 18- 119 -23 -12 -0002) (city file 14 -010). Three Rivers Park District has submitted a request for a temporary trailhead at this location. Staff is currently reviewing the application for completeness. This has been scheduled for the June 24th Parks and Trails Commission meeting for informal review. A public hearing was held at the July 3rd Planning Commission meeting and City Council will take action on July 241H 4. Hentges Lawn Land Snow Special Home Occupation at 21310 Meadow Lane (City file 14 -012). An application was submitted and staff notified the applicant of items needed to make this a complete application. The application may be administratively approved. 5. Sprint Antenna administrative permit at 20140 CR 30 (city file 14 -013). An administrative permit was received to upgrade the antennas on this existing tower. Staff is reviewing for completeness. The application may be administratively approved. 6. Topographic Survey and Wetland Delineation Waiver for Mike Patnode at 22610 CR 50 (city file 14 -014). The applicant has submitted an application and staff has notified them of additional items needed to make this item complete. We expect this to be placed on the July 24th Council agenda for consideration. 7. Feasibility Studies for the Peachtree Partners LLC Project on for Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10. (Sanitary Sewer and Water - city file 14 -015) (Transportation -city file 14 -016) (Stormwater - city file 14 -017). The applicant has submitted a formal request and escrow deposit for the City Engineer to begin the feasibility studies that will be need prior to a formal preliminary plat, rezoning and preliminary PUD development plan application. These feasibility reports will be presented at the July 24th City Council meeting. Landform , SensiblyGreen and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 8. Administrative Permit for Global Signal Acquisitions for Sprint Antenna at 7205 CR 101 (PID 25- 119 -23 -44 -0005) (city file 14 -018). This applicant may be administratively approved. The application is currently incomplete. 9. Administrative Permit and Site Plan for AT &T antenna at 20140 CR 30 (PID 11- 119 -23 -12 -0001) (city file 14 -019). This applicant may be administratively approved. The application is currently incomplete. Also, there are a number of projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out: 1. Corcoran Business Park (city file 06 -005). The City Council granted a one year extension to the final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and is still working to close out this project. Notably, we met with the land owner in February and may have a new development application for this site later this year. Hope Ministries Conditional Use Permit for Cemetery and Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easement at 19951 Oswald Farm Road (city file 12 -002). Hope Ministries submitted a request for a conditional use permit to allow a cemetery west of the existing church. The application was approved by the City Council on March 22nd and site work had begun. The letter of credit for site improvements has been released but we are holding the escrow pending completion of the approved landscaping. The applicant has indicated that they are considering a site plan amendment application to modify the approved plans. 10. Heinz Second Addition Preliminary and Final Plat at 20801 CR 117 (03- 119 -23 -14 -0002) (City file 13 -003). A wetland and topographic waiver was approved on January 24th. This item was approved by the City Council action on April 25th. The applicant is working on complying with approval conditions so that they can get the final plat mylar signed and recorded. The applicant has site work to complete and then the escrow can be refunded. 11. Ess Addition (city files 05 -017, 08 -003 and 12 -024). The City Council granted an after - the -fact extension for this final plat at their November 29, 2012 meeting and a second extension at the November 25, 2013 meeting. The plat has been recorded and staff is working with the applicant to address any outstanding issues and close out the file /refund the escrow after wetland monuments and lot monuments are installed this spring. 12. Lano Equipment at 23580 Highway 55 Site Plan Modifications for Cold Storage Building. (31- 119 -23 -34 -0007) (13 -006). This item was approved by the City Council on July 11 h. The building permit has been issued, but staff has determined that the building was not being built according the approved plans. The City Planner and Code Enforcement Official met with the applicant on March 26th to review the conditions of approval. The applicant submitted revised plans and the City Council approved a site plan modification at the June 12th meeting. The Code Enforcement Official is working with them to complete a building permit application and make the corrections to the building. 13. Ess Brothers Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for an accessory building at 9350 County Road (PID # 07- 119 -23 -43 -0004) (City File No. 13 -031) The applicant is requesting approval for a 5,500 square feet detached, accessory building with 20 -foot sidewalls. The City Council approved this item on January 23rd. The applicant must now file the resolution at the County and then staff will close out the file and refund any remaining escrow. The applicant may apply for a building permit after the resolution is recorded. 14. Maple Hill Estates 3rd Addition Preliminary and Final Plat (PID 24- 119 -23 -43 -0016 and 24- 119 -23- 43 -0014) (city file 14 -001). A site plan and variance was approved on April 25, 2013 for this project, but it was recently was determined that the new community center should be located on City property. The plat is required to adjust property lines. The preliminary plat was reviewed at a public hearing at the March 6th Planning Commission meeting. The City Council approved the preliminary and final plat on March 27th. The mylar has been prepared and is ready for signatures and filing. 15. Lennar Final Plat, Vacation, Development Contract and Final PUD Development Plan for "Ravinia" (City file 14 -003). The applications were approved at the April 24th City Council meeting. MEMORANDUM Staff is now working through the final plan revisions with the applicant. The development contract has been signed, the financial guarantee submitted and the final details are being addressed. The demolition of the existing home and grading has begun. There are a number of approval conditions that must be addressed prior to release of the final plat mylar for recording and initiation of the infrastructure work. 16. Peachtree Partners request for PUD Sketch Plan and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14 -005). Development of this site will require several complicated transportation and right -of -way decisions that need to be guided by City Council. Staff has provided direction to the applicant based on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which shows a realignment of County Road 10 up to Meister Road and a local street connection from the old County Road 10 to County Road 50. The applicant has provided a concept that incorporates these road improvements but has indicated that they do not need these items to occur for their project. The applicant is asking to reguide the 103 -acre property from High Density Residential to Low Density Residential, which requires a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and extension of municipal sewer and water. The City Council has informally reviewed this concept at December and January City Council meetings. This was reviewed by Parks Commission on March 18th and Planning Commission public hearing on March 6th. On June 12th, the City Council approved the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Staff submitted the application to the Metropolitan Council for review and we will work with the applicant outline the next steps in the process. 17. Fox Ridge 2nd Addition Final Plat at 9495 Trail Haven Road (PID 09- 119 -23 -41 -0011) (City File 14- 006). This final plat application for a final plat of Outlot A, Baumeister 3rd Addition was approved by the City Council on May 22nd. The applicant will prepare mylar for signature and filing. After the documents are filed, the remaining escrow can be released. 18. Agriculture Preserve Designation and Expiration for Don Scherber at 22622 County 10. (PID 08- 119 -23 -42 -0002 and 17- 119 -23 -11 -0001) (City file 14 -008). Don and Ann Scherber are requesting approval to re- enroll this property in Agricultural Preserve and initiate expiration. This property has been enrolled since 1986. The Council approved this application at the May 22nd meeting. 19. Saue Certificate of Compliance for an accessory building with a metal roof at 9950 Sundance Road. (City File 14 -011). This was administratively approved. Finally, there are a few projects that have not yet been started but have been identified as action items or future projects: Sign Ordinance Update. At the April 25th Council meeting, the City reviewed a request for the city to initiate a sign ordinance update. Specifically, they requested that the City review the ordinance standards relating to sign area, sign height and internal illumination and, because this is a city -wide issue, that the ordinance update be completed by the City out of the City funds. The Council discussed the issue and directed staff to bring a proposal back at a later date because the Council felt that this was a significant undertaking that would involve much more than this one issue. We will work with the City Administrator to determine the appropriate meeting to have this considered. 2. Design Guideline Update for Southeast District/Downtown. The Council approved a Landform proposal to update the existing design guidelines for this area. The design guidelines are adopted as part of the Zoning Ordinance and will be enforced as new development is proposed, consequently, the City Council wishes to revisit that planning effort to ensure it is still consistent with the City's goals. The City Council appointed a subcommittee, but the City Council has decided to delay kickoff as we work through some associated issues as part of some new development plans. We expect to convene this subcommittee later this year. MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT / Code Compliance Agenda Item: 8 b. Council Meeting: Prepared By: July 24, 2014 Mike Pritchard Topic: Action Required: CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT — June 2014 Information Only Complaints and Concerns Permits and Zoning Referred to Public Building Complaints Nuisiance Grass 8 Misc. Cases Grading Overweight Concerns Junk /Junk Weed Animal Home signs Works, Compaints Referred to Permits- Building Driveway y Misc. /Ag Vehicle Violations Occupations Metro West, Zoning Permits Permits Total Vehicles Control Concerns City Attorney Permits Permits or City review Engineer 22 6 6 1 1 1 7 14 0 14 31 2 6 0 Code Enforcement Issues: Complaint 14 -023: Home Occupation; Exterior Storage; Nuisance Violations at 21XXX Meadow Ln. The City received complaints from multiple residents regarding a home occupation operating at the residence. We have met with the property owner and believe we have a solution. The property /business owner has lessened the impact on neighboring properties by removing equipment and moving operations offsite. A Special Home Occupation Permit has been applied for and is in process, however, we continue to receive complaints from neighbors regarding business operations, traffic, and exterior storage. Complaint 14- Multiple: Junk /Debris; Junk Vehicles; Exterior Storage Violations at 78XX Maple Hill Rd. The City has received complaints from multiple residents regarding the property. There has been a lot of progress made in cleaning up the property. We will continue to monitor progress. Complaint 14 -016: Junk /Debris; Junk Vehicles at 19XXX Hillside Drive. The owner has made extensive progress in cleaning up the property. We will continue to work with the property owner, allowing progress is continues. Complaint 14 -002: Vacant building; Junk /Debris; Possible hazardous condition at 76XX Rolling Hills Road. Clean -up is complete. Complaint 12 -031: Hazardous Building at 20xxx County Road 10. No Update. CITY OF CORCORAN 2014 PERFORMANCE REPORT - GENERAL FUND JULY 18, 2014 8c. NOTE: JUNE PAYROLL IS NOT INCLUDED IS THIS REPORT 2014 Variance Account Description 2013 Actual 2014 Budget 2014 Actual Amount Remaining % Remaining Year End Forecast Budget vs YEF COMMENTS REVENUE Other General Government R 100-41900-31020 Delinquent Property Taxes 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 R 100 -41900 -31100 General Property Taxes 2,579,424.62 2,743,280.00 1,123,800.00 1,619,480.00 59.03% 2,743,280.00 0.00 R 100 -41900 -31810 Cable Franchise Fee 39,489.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 100.00% 35,000.00 0.00 R 100-41900-32110 Liquor License Fee 18,300.00 18,250.00 18,250.00 0.00 0.00% 18,250.00 0.00 R 100 -41900 -33402 Homestead Credit 11,028.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 R 100 -41900 -33420 Ag Preserve Credit 8,414.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 R 100 -41900 -33421 PERA State Aid 1,845.00 1,845.00 0.00 1,845.00 100.00% 1,845.00 0.00 R 100 -41900 -33422 Other State Grants and Aids 0.00 7,058.00 0.00 7,058.00 0.00% 7,058.00 0.00 LGA R 100-41900-34103 Zoning /Land Use Appl Fee 37,805.00 6,000.00 6,180.00 - 180.00 - 3.00% 6,500.00 500.00 R 100 -41900 -34105 Copies /Maps 338.11 150.00 134.40 0.00 0.00% 150.00 0.00 R 100-41900-34107 Special Assessment Search 100.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 100.00% 50.00 0.00 R 100-41900-34108 TIF Administration 12,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 R 100 -41900 -34405 Clean Up Day Income 675.00 675.00 1,425.00 - 750.00 - 111.11% 1,425.00 750.00 R 100 -41900 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenues 16,075.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 2,500.00 0.00 Work Comp Ins dividend /Sign permit R 100 -41900 -36210 Interest Earnings 1,028.47 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 100.00% 2,000.00 - 1,000.00 R 100 -41900 -36220 Other Rents and Royalties 10,848.00 10,848.00 9,840.00 1,008.00 9.29% 9,840.00 - 1,008.00 Cropland rental bid lower than expected R 100 -41900 -36230 Donations 1,300.00 1,000.00 675.62 324.38 0.00% 1,000.00 0.00 R 100 -41900 -36233 Refunds /Reimbursements - 117.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 $ 2,738,552.90 $ 2,829,656.00 $ 1,160,305.02 $ 2,828,898.00 $ (758.00) City Hall Operations R 100 -41941 -34101 Facility Rental 6,095.00 4,500.00 5,125.00 - 625.00 - 13.89% 5,250.00 750.00 R 100 -41941 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenues 2,819.66 1,000.00 702.96 297.04 0.00% 1,000.00 0.00 Mailbox posts, NW Jaycees Donation $ 8,914.66 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,827.96 0.00% $ 6,250.00 $ 750.00 Police R 100 -42100 -33423 Police Aid 43,430.64 47,000.00 0.00 47,000.00 100.00% 47,000.00 0.00 2% of insurance premium tax (MN 69.011 to 69.051) R 100 -42100 -33424 Police POST Board Train Reimb 3,759.28 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 100.00% 3,500.00 0.00 R 100 - 42100 -33620 Other County Grants /Aid 12,283.22 10,000.00 4,897.35 5,102.65 51.03% 10,000.00 0.00 Pass through only R 100 -42100 -34200 Police Permits 2,054.00 1,500.00 1,115.00 385.00 25.67% 1,500.00 0.00 R 100 -42100 -34201 Police Serviced Charges 10,052.50 5,000.00 475.00 4,525.00 90.50% 5,000.00 0.00 Pass through only R 100 -42100 -34202 Police Reports /Fees 929.00 800.00 251.00 549.00 68.63% 800.00 0.00 R 100 - 42100 -35101 Fines 56,406.54 75,000.00 13,773.38 61,226.62 81.64% 40,000.00 - 35,000.00 R 100 - 42100 -36233 Refunds /Reimbursements 9,480.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 $ 138,396.06 $ 142,800.00 $ 20,511.73 $ 107,800.00 $ (35,000.00) Building Inspection R 100 -42400 -32210 Bldg /Plan Review Fees $ 141,223.96 $ 50,000.00 $ 38,889.60 $ 11,110.40 22.22% $ 50,000.00 $ - Public Works R 100 -43100 -33418 Muni State Aid St Maintenance 112,545.90 125,000.00 65,234.10 59,765.90 47.81% 125,000.00 0.00 R 100 -43100 -34300 Public Works Permits /Fees 2,670.00 3,000.00 1,225.00 1,775.00 59.17% 3,000.00 0.00 R 100 -43100 -34301 Dust Control 64,533.43 55,530.00 0.00 55,530.00 100.00% 55,530.00 0.00 R 100 -43100 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenues 9,583.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 $ 189,332.45 $ 183,530.00 $ 66,459.10 $ 183,530.00 $ - Ice & Snow Removal R 100 -43125 -36200 Ice & Snow Removal /Miscellaneous Rev $ - $ - $ 7,926.45 $ (7,926.45) 0.00% $ 7,926.00 $ 7,926.00 Salt sold to neighboring city Recycling R 100 -43232 -33610 County Recycling Grant 14,808.00 14,500.00 0.00 14,500.00 100.00% 14,500.00 0.00 R 100 -43232 -34400 Recycling 61,932.01 64,000.00 50,542.90 13,457.10 21.03% 62,000.00 - 2,000.00 $ 76,740.01 $ 78,500.00 $ 50,542.90 $ 76,500.00 $ (2,000.00) Parks R 100 -45200 -33422 Other State Grants and Aids 32,599.08 37,302.00 37,302.30 -0.30 0.00% 37,302.00 0.00 NW Trails Grant R 100 -45200 -34101 Facility Rental 1,614.83 1,000.00 1,209.98 - 209.98 - 21.00% 1,250.00 250.00 R 100 -45200 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenues 13,550.00 0.00 25.00 -25.00 0.00% 25.00 25.00 R 100 -45200 -36230 Donations 2,485.00 0.00 900.00 - 900.00 0.00% 900.00 - 900.00 $ 50,248.91 $ 38,302.00 $ 39,437.28 $ 39,477.00 $ 1,175.00 Total Revenue $ 3,343,409 $ 3,328,288 $ 1,389,900 $ 3,300,381 $ (27,907) 1 of 5 CITY OF CORCORAN 2014 PERFORMANCE REPORT - GENERAL FUND JULY 18, 2014 8c. Account Description 2013 Actual 2014 Budget 2014 Actual Amount Remaining % Remaining Year End Forecast Budqet vs YEF COMMENTS EXPENSE City Council E 100 -41100 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) 6,600.00 6,600.00 3,300.00 3,300.00 50.00% 6,600.00 0.00 E 100 - 41100 -122 FICA 409.20 409.00 204.60 204.40 49.98% 409.00 0.00 E 100-41100-126 Medicare 95.70 96.00 47.85 48.15 50.16% 96.00 0.00 E 100-41100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 100.00% 0.00 - 100.00 E 100-41100-364 Worker's Comp Insurance 41.00 46.00 54.00 -8.00 - 17.39% 54.00 8.00 $ 7,145.90 $ 7,251.00 $ 3,606.45 $ 7,159.00 $ (92.00) Newspaper /Newsletter/Website E 100-41130-351 Newsletter Expenses 4,481.86 4,500.00 2,221.18 2,278.82 50.64% 4,500.00 0.00 E 100-41130-354 Web Site 700.00 700.00 0.00 700.00 100.00% 700.00 0.00 $ 5,181.86 $ 5,200.00 $ 2,221.18 $ 5,200.00 $ - City Administrator E 100 - 41300 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) 117,644.12 91,780.00 43,980.83 47,799.17 52.08% 92,997.00 1,217.00 E 100 -41300 -121 PERA 8,312.71 6,654.00 3,188.63 3,465.37 52.08% 6,742.00 88.00 E 100 - 41300 -122 FICA 6,639.05 5,690.00 2,404.78 3,285.22 57.74% 5,768.00 78.00 E 100 -41300 -126 Medicare 1,444.22 1,331.00 562.38 768.62 57.75% 1,348.00 17.00 E 100 - 41300 -131 Employer Paid Health 17,622.15 16,745.00 11,622.29 5,122.71 30.59% 16,745.00 0.00 E 100 -41300 -208 Training and Instruction 1,321.00 3,650.00 2,526.86 1,123.14 30.77% 3,650.00 0.00 E 100 - 41300 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 868.21 700.00 540.58 159.42 22.77% 700.00 0.00 E 100 -41300 -364 Worker's Comp Insurance 354.00 809.00 477.00 332.00 41.04% 477.00 - 332.00 E 100 - 41300 -433 Dues and Memberships 873.00 700.00 111.60 588.40 84.06% 700.00 0.00 $ 155,078.46 $ 128,059.00 $ 65,414.95 $ 129,127.00 $ 1,068.00 Clerk/Admin E 100 -41400 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) 127,510.98 120,082.00 56,806.85 63,275.15 52.69% 120,082.00 0.00 E 100 - 41400 -110 Overtime 1,978.92 2,000.00 568.62 1,431.38 71.57% 2,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 41400 -121 PERA 8,721.62 8,851.00 4,076.81 4,774.19 53.94% 8,851.00 0.00 E 100 - 41400 -122 FICA 8,428.42 7,569.00 3,374.57 4,194.43 55.42% 7,569.00 0.00 E 100 - 41400 -126 Medicare 1,971.07 1,770.00 796.21 973.79 55.02% 1,770.00 0.00 E 100 - 41400 -131 Employer Paid Health 21,870.92 30,100.00 19,307.14 10,792.86 35.86% 30,100.00 0.00 E 100 - 41400 -208 Training and Instruction 1,835.00 2,500.00 360.00 2,140.00 85.60% 2,500.00 0.00 E 100 - 41400 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 457.08 500.00 51.96 448.04 89.61% 500.00 0.00 E 100 - 41400 -364 Worker's Comp Insurance 1,064.00 1,041.00 954.00 87.00 8.36% 954.00 -87.00 E 100 - 41400 -433 Dues and Memberships 70.00 150.00 35.00 115.00 0.00% 150.00 0.00 $ 173,908.01 $ 174,563.00 $ 86,331.16 $ 174,476.00 $ (87.00) Elections E 100 -41410 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $ 1,397.37 $ 5,000.00 $ 38.77 $ 4,961.23 99.22% $ 10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Auditor/Treasurer E 100 - 41540 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $ 22,992.00 $ 24,940.00 $ 21,730.00 $ 3,210.00 12.87% $ 24,940.00 $ - Assessor E 100 -41550 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 960.32 1,000.00 341.46 658.54 65.85% 1,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 41550 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 50,202.57 52,788.00 26,464.95 26,323.05 49.87% 52,788.00 0.00 $ 51,162.89 $ 53,788.00 $ 26,806.41 $ 53,788.00 $ - Attorney E 100 -41600 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 30,864.60 30,000.00 5,425.00 24,575.00 70.21% 30,000.00 0.00 $ 30,864.60 $ 30,000.00 $ 5,425.00 $ 30,000.00 $ - Other General Government E 100 - 41900 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 3,319.40 3,255.00 2,702.00 553.00 0.00% 5,109.10 1,854.10 Crop Land Tax and Ryan Wetland property tax E 100 -41900 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 25,720.98 0.00 6,658.16 - 6,658.16 0.00% 6,500.00 6,500.00 E 100 - 41900 -360 Insurance (GENERAL) 54,412.00 57,000.00 64,813.00 - 7,813.00 - 13.71% 64,813.00 7,813.00 E 100 -41900 -433 Dues and Memberships 25,489.13 27,115.00 20,509.74 6,605.26 24.36% 27,115.00 0.00 ECW,Metro Cities, NWHHSC,Community Media,LMC,194 Chamber, Home Free $ 108,941.51 $ 87,370.00 $ 94,682.90 $ 103,537.10 $ 16,167.10 Planning & Zoning E 100 - 41910 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 589.44 1,000.00 779.65 220.35 22.04% 1,000.00 0.00 E 100 -41910 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 42,088.62 50,000.00 20,082.16 29,917.84 59.84% 50,000.00 0.00 $ 42,678.06 $ 51,000.00 $ 20,861.81 $ 51,000.00 $ - Code Enforcement E 100 - 41920 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) 42,876.41 50,440.00 23,816.33 26,623.67 52.78% 50,440.00 0.00 E 100-41920-110 Overtime 371.39 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 100.00% 1,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 41920 -121 PERA 3,076.81 3,729.00 1,726.68 2,002.32 53.70% 3,729.00 0.00 E 100 -41920 -122 FICA 2,999.95 3,189.00 1,653.05 1,535.95 48.16% 3,189.00 0.00 E 100 - 41920 -126 Medicare 701.63 746.00 386.62 359.38 48.17% 746.00 0.00 E 100-41920-131 Em to er Paid Health 6,426.24 15,050.00 3,820.31 11,229.69 74.62% 15,050.00 0.00 2 of 5 CITY OF CORCORAN 2014 PERFORMANCE REPORT - GENERAL FUND JULY 18, 2014 8c. Account Description 2013 Actual 2014 Budget 2014 Actual Amount Remaining % Remaining Year End Forecast Budget vs YEF COMMENTS E 100 - 41920 -208 Training and Instruction 0.00 750.00 0.00 750.00 0.00% 750.00 0.00 E 100 -41920 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 708.01 1,000.00 391.86 608.14 60.81% 1,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 41920 -364 Worker's Comp Insurance 0.00 401.00 477.00 -76.00 0.00% 401.00 0.00 E 100 -41920 -417 Uniforms 100.00 200.00 250.00 -50.00 - 25.00% 250.00 50.00 E 100 - 41920 -433 Dues and Memberships 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 100.00% 100.00 0.00 $ 57,260.44 $ 76,605.00 $ 32,521.85 $ 76,655.00 $ 50.00 City Hall Operations E 100 -41941 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) 2,462.30 3,000.00 1,746.57 1,253.43 41.78% 3,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 41941 -201 Postage /Shipping 2,424.15 2,500.00 1,106.14 1,393.86 55.75% 2,500.00 0.00 E 100 -41941 -207 Computer Supplies 2,615.49 3,000.00 1,074.27 1,925.73 64.19% 3,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 41941 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 16,042.88 12,500.00 6,607.37 5,892.63 47.14% 12,500.00 0.00 E 100 -41941 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 7,668.34 7,300.00 4,075.05 3,224.95 44.18% 7,300.00 0.00 E 100 - 41941 -321 Telephone 2,188.94 3,000.00 1,105.10 1,894.90 63.16% 3,000.00 0.00 E 100 -41941 -352 General Notices and Pub Info 2,796.61 1,500.00 666.07 833.93 55.60% 1,500.00 0.00 E 100 - 41941 -364 Worker's Comp Insurance 0.00 14.00 0.00 14.00 100.00% 0.00 -14.00 E 100 -41941 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 15,120.53 14,500.00 8,176.49 6,323.51 43.61% 14,500.00 0.00 E 100 - 41941 -400 Repairs & Maint Cont (GENERAL) 8,111.69 9,000.00 5,845.57 3,154.43 35.05% 9,000.00 0.00 E 100 -41941 -520 Buildings and Structures 4,052.68 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00% 4,000.00 0.00 $ 63,487.61 $ 60,314.00 $ 30,402.63 $ 60,300.00 $ (14.00) IT (Info Technology) E 100 - 41951 -207 Computer Supplies 9,722.50 7,500.00 6,441.33 1,058.67 14.12% 7,500.00 0.00 E 100 -41951 -210 Operating Supplies 1,252.45 4,500.00 0.00 4,500.00 100.00% 4,500.00 0.00 E 100 - 41951 -300 Professional Srvs 4,897.41 6,000.00 2,297.50 3,702.50 61.71% 6,000.00 0.00 $ 24,456.35 $ 18,000.00 $ 8,738.83 $ 18,000.00 $ - Police E 100 -42100 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) 522,277.19 530,227.00 247,214.45 283,012.55 53.38% 530,227.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -110 Overtime 2,283.06 7,000.00 6,081.09 918.91 13.13% 7,000.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -111 Overtime Events /Grants 14,177.95 15,000.00 5,067.09 9,932.91 66.22% 15,000.00 0.00 Pass thru revenue 100 - 42100 -33620 E 100 - 42100 -121 PERA 77,455.53 83,853.00 38,371.58 45,481.42 54.24% 83,853.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -126 Medicare 8,079.99 7,947.00 3,830.34 4,116.66 51.80% 7,947.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -130 Employer Paid FSA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -131 Employer Paid Health 81,034.11 97,348.00 55,144.10 42,203.90 43.35% 97,348.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) 4,750.87 5,000.00 2,267.31 2,732.69 54.65% 5,000.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -201 Postage /Shipping 152.30 250.00 137.93 112.07 44.83% 250.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -208 Training and Instruction 9,676.56 10,000.00 7,713.79 2,286.21 22.86% 10,000.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -209 Police Reserves 3,499.13 3,500.00 345.22 3,154.78 90.14% 3,500.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 3,271.92 4,000.00 1,187.76 2,812.24 70.31% 4,000.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -211 Contracted Security 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -212 Motor Fuels 37,363.38 37,000.00 13,565.67 23,434.33 63.34% 37,000.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) 9,244.34 8,000.00 5,532.37 2,467.63 30.85% 8,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -223 Building Repair Supplies 3,403.13 3,000.00 1,825.87 1,174.13 39.14% 3,000.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 30.00 250.00 80.00 170.00 68.00% 250.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -301 Prisoner 12,002.49 8,000.00 3,355.28 4,644.72 58.06% 8,000.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -304 Legal Fees 30,320.42 27,500.00 10,412.90 17,087.10 62.13% 27,500.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -321 Telephone 6,903.37 7,200.00 3,932.33 3,267.67 45.38% 7,200.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -323 Radio Units 13,975.41 15,300.00 6,768.10 8,531.90 55.76% 15,300.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -364 Worker's Comp Insurance 15,029.02 23,520.00 19,201.00 4,319.00 18.36% 19,201.00 - 4,319.00 E 100 -42100 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 3,558.51 4,000.00 2,363.25 1,636.75 40.92% 4,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -417 Uniforms 6,438.60 9,460.00 7,535.18 1,924.82 20.35% 9,460.00 0.00 E 100 -42100 -433 Dues and Memberships 1,470.00 1,200.00 1,145.00 55.00 4.58% 1,200.00 0.00 E 100 - 42100 -810 Refunds /Reimbursements - 19,184.73 0.00 0.00% - 25,000.00 0.00 Work Comp reimbursement from LMCIT $ 866,397.28 $ 908,555.00 $ 423,892.88 $ 879,236.00 $ (29,319.00) Part Time Officers E 100 -42101 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) 87,685.90 78,100.00 44,130.90 33,969.10 43.49% 93,100.00 15,000.00 Additional hours to cover FT hours due to injuries E 100 - 42101 -111 Overtime Events /Grants 3,765.80 0.00 275.00 - 275.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 Contractural events /Safe and Sober events. Budgeted 100-42100-111 E 100 -42101 -121 PERA 2,182.87 2,500.00 722.84 1,777.16 71.09% 2,500.00 0.00 E 100 - 42101 -122 FICA 4,730.42 4,842.00 2,459.92 2,382.08 49.20% 4,842.00 0.00 E 100 -42101 -126 Medicare 1,325.99 1,132.00 643.87 488.13 43.12% 1,132.00 0.00 $ 99,690.98 $ 86,574.00 $ 48,232.53 $ 101,574.00 $ 15,000.00 Police Admin E 100 - 42102 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) 42,309.03 45,011.00 21,280.65 23,730.35 52.72% 45,011.00 0.00 E 100 -42102 -110 Overtime 0.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 100.00% 500.00 0.00 E 100 - 42102 -121 PERA 3,027.63 3,300.00 1,542.84 1,757.16 53.25% 3,300.00 0.00 E 100 -42102 -122 FICA 2,849.90 2,822.00 1,459.72 1,362.28 48.27% 2,822.00 0.00 E 100 - 42102 -126 Medicare 666.53 660.00 341.38 318.62 48.28% 660.00 0.00 E 100 -42102 -131 Employer Paid Health 6,774.27 8,000.00 3,884.37 4,115.63 51.45% 8,000.00 0.00 3 of 5 CITY OF CORCORAN 2014 PERFORMANCE REPORT - GENERAL FUND JULY 18, 2014 8c. Account Description 2013 Actual 2014 Budget 2014 Actual Amount Remaining % Remaining Year End Forecast Budget vs YEF COMMENTS $ 55,627.36 $ 60,293.00 $ 28,508.96 $ 60,293.00 $ - Fire E 100 - 42200 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 236,477.60 239,000.00 145,548.26 93,451.74 39.10% 239,000.00 0.00 $ 236,477.60 $ 239,000.00 $ 145,548.26 0.00% $ 239,000.00 $ - Building Inspection E 100 -42400 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 19,262.77 28,000.00 15,582.42 12,417.58 44.35% 28,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 42400 -437 Surcharges 3,811.74 5,000.00 1,216.59 3,783.41 75.67% 5,000.00 0.00 $ 23,074.51 $ 33,000.00 $ 16,799.01 $ 33,000.00 $ - Public Works E 100 -43100 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) 268,972.97 285,440.00 134,152.23 151,287.77 53.00% 284,357.00 - 1,083.00 Lead position not filled to date E 100 - 43100 -110 Overtime 26,178.50 19,380.00 17,673.99 1,706.01 8.80% 19,380.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -121 PERA 21,103.89 22,099.00 10,569.58 11,529.42 52.17% 22,021.00 -78.00 E 100 - 43100 -122 FICA 17,244.43 18,899.00 8,867.07 10,031.93 53.08% 18,832.00 -67.00 E 100 -43100 -126 Medicare 3,983.20 4,420.00 2,073.72 2,346.28 53.08% 4,404.00 -16.00 E 100 - 43100 -131 Employer Paid Health 47,773.39 75,250.00 44,593.15 30,656.85 40.74% 75,250.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -140 Unemployment Comp (GENERAL) 4,056.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 E 100 - 43100 -208 Training and Instruction 2,191.29 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 100.00% 4,000.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 21,766.72 25,000.00 10,879.99 14,120.01 56.48% 25,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 43100 -212 Motor Fuels 40,128.07 37,000.00 24,254.09 12,745.91 34.45% 37,000.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) 18,707.82 20,000.00 4,067.88 15,932.12 79.66% 20,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 43100 -222 Seal Coating 0.00 50,000.00 51,554.71 - 1,554.71 -3.11% 50,000.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -223 Building Repair Supplies 3,890.36 4,500.00 6,729.04 - 2,229.04 - 49.53% 14,500.00 10,000.00 Cost related to equip new facility E 100 - 43100 -225 Landscape /Ditch Materials 9,807.11 10,000.00 1,085.93 8,914.07 89.14% 10,000.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials 6,145.88 6,000.00 44.96 5,955.04 99.25% 6,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 43100 -227 Crack Filling 9,426.38 10,000.00 752.50 9,247.50 92.48% 10,000.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -228 Dust Control 102,689.08 110,000.00 324.56 109,675.44 99.70% 110,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 43100 -229 Culverts 208.73 10,000.00 665.96 9,334.04 93.34% 10,000.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -232 Gravel 118,591.70 130,000.00 112,670.38 17,329.62 13.33% 130,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 43100 -233 Asphalt Maint/Patching 116,912.41 130,000.00 82,527.74 47,472.26 36.52% 130,000.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 2,216.00 2,100.00 2,100.00 0.00 0.00% 2,100.00 0.00 E 100 - 43100 -321 Telephone 3,868.26 6,000.00 3,890.79 2,109.21 35.15% 6,000.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -364 Worker's Comp Insurance 17,899.00 25,971.00 14,706.00 11,265.00 43.38% 25,971.00 0.00 E 100 - 43100 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 14,210.87 15,000.00 18,384.41 - 3,384.41 - 22.56% 24,000.00 9,000.00 New facility E 100 -43100 -381 Street/Signal Lights 3,561.49 3,500.00 1,390.27 2,109.73 60.28% 3,500.00 0.00 E 100 - 43100 -417 Uniforms 6,344.95 7,000.00 2,449.64 4,550.36 65.01% 7,000.00 0.00 E 100 -43100 -810 Refunds /Reimbursements 60.00 0.00 1,800.00 60.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 $ 887,939.01 $ 1,031,559.00 $ 558,208.59 $ 1,049,315.00 $ 17,756.00 Ice & Snow Removal E 100 - 43125 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $ 39,361.42 $ 29,000.00 $ 22,884.32 0.00% $ 29,000.00 $ - Engineeering E 100 -43170 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $ 38,592.29 $ 40,000.00 $ 21,844.58 $ 18,155.42 45.39% $ 40,000.00 $ - Employee Benefit Chgs E 100 - 43190 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $ - $ 3,000.00 $ - $ 3,000.00 0.00% $ - $ (3,000.00) Recycling E 100 -43232 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 796.92 1,000.00 1,019.93 (19.93) - 1.99% 1,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 43232 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 67,420.41 69,000.00 35,683.42 33,316.58 48.28% 69,000.00 0.00 $ 68,217.33 $ 70,000.00 $ 36,703.35 $ 70,000.00 $ - Parks E 100 -45200 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) 23,462.73 29,425.00 9,897.26 19,527.74 66.36% 29,425.00 0.00 E 100 - 45200 -110 Overtime 450.00 0.00 292.50 - 292.50 0.00% 0.00 0.00 E 100 -45200 -122 FICA 1,481.08 1,824.00 631.76 1,192.24 65.36% 1,824.00 0.00 E 100 - 45200 -126 Medicare 346.39 427.00 147.77 279.23 65.39% 427.00 0.00 E 100 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 25,139.49 10,000.00 3,119.17 6,880.83 68.81% 10,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) 293.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 E 100 -45200 -221 Maintenance Projects 13,946.45 15,000.00 2,826.97 12,173.03 81.15% 15,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 45200 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 400.00 - 400.00 0.00% 400.00 400.00 E 100 -45200 -321 Telephone 652.20 700.00 292.40 407.60 58.23% 700.00 0.00 E 100 - 45200 -364 Worker's Comp Insurance 947.00 1,189.00 2,556.00 - 1,367.00 - 114.97% 2,556.00 1,367.00 E 100 -45200 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 6,329.92 8,000.00 2,864.93 5,135.07 64.19% 8,000.00 0.00 E 100 - 45200 -530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 32,599.08 37,302.00 37,302.30 -0.30 0.00% 37,302.00 0.00 NW Trails Grant E 100 - 45200 -810 Refunds /Reimbursements 0.00 0.00 145.23 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 $ 105,648.27 $ 103,867.00 $ 60,476.29 $ 105,634.00 $ 1,767.00 Total Expense $ 3165 581 $ 3,326,938 $ 1,761,881 $ 3,351,234 $ 24 296.10 4 of 5 CITY OF CORCORAN 2014 PERFORMANCE REPORT - GENERAL FUND JULY 18, 2014 8c. Account Description 2013 Actual 2014 Budget 2014 Actual Amount Remaining % Remaining Year End Forecast Budget vs YEF COMMENTS GENERAL FUND TOTALS Total Revenue $ 3,343,409 $ 3,328,288 $ 1,389,900 $ 3,300,381 $ (27,907) Total Expense $ 3,165,581 $ 3,326,938 $ 1,761,881 $ 3,351,234 $ 24,296 Total Revenue - Total Expense $ 177,828 $ 1,350 $ (371,981) $ (50,853) $ 52,203 5 of 5 Agenda Item:_ • • L A N D F 0 R M From Site to Finish 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: July 17, 2014 for the July 24, 2014 City Council Meeting • • Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 www.landform.net RE: City- Initiated Ordinance Amendment regarding Park Dedication Requirements (City file 14 -007) 60 -DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: N/A Application Request The City Council directed staff to prepare revisions to the subdivision ordinance regarding park dedication. Specifically, staff identified 3 issues that recently arose and identified a need for these ordinance revisions: Density, Trails and Park Dedication Fees. 2. June 24th Council Meeting At the June 24th Council meeting, the Council discussed three proposed changes to the park dedication ordinance. The Council agreed: a. To change the density definition as proposed by staff and b. That developers should be required to grade and provide ground cover for all trails within their development at their own cost, but that the cost of paving the trails should remain a city cost as outlined in the park dedication basis calculations. The City would then have the option of having the developer pave the trails within the development and providing park dedication credit for the cost of the paving or the City could pave the trails at a later date when trail connection or loop could be made. The Council had significant discussion about the assumptions in the original park dedication analysis. Council member Cossette had a number of concerns about how the former park planner calculated the ultimate cost of the system (which is the basis for the park dedication fees) and noted that he had several other concerns. The Council directed staff to meet directly with Council member Cossette to discuss his concerns. Meeting with Council member Cossette Staff met with Council member Cossette on July 1St to discuss his concerns. He identified three primary concerns: a. The City has long struggled with the concept of equity in park dedication requirements between the MUSA and non -MUSA areas of the City. He noted particularly his opinion that Landform, SensiblyG, en and Site to Finish are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. ! the biggest problem with the current ordinance is with the cash and land requirements for the non -MUSA properties, which seems to be disproportionate to their park usage. b. He believes that using the post - development density calculations are a more accurate reflection of the park demand and that the City should use this calculation rather than the pre - development density calculations. Staff continues to recommend using the pre - development density calculations because the city has some data about gross land area and wetland areas needed to estimate area with some accuracy. The post development calculation requires the city to make assumptions about the area of stormwater ponds, streets, wetland buffers and other areas that are much harder to estimate on a city -wide basis. C. Questioned whether the park dedication ordinance assumptions were based on the 2030 population estimates or whether they were based on the 2030 Land Use Plan, which includes enough land to accommodate roughly 3 times the 2030 population estimates. We have reviewed the documents and find that the park dedication assumptions were based on the 2030 population estimates. Staff had originally proposed what we believed were minor housekeeping items to the Park Dedication ordinance. The questions raised by the City Council at the meeting and by Council member Cossette after the meeting are more significant policy issues that will require significantly more staff time to research and analyze the data and prepare options for the City Council. Revisiting the MUSA/non -MUSA park dedication requirements will require coordination with the City Attorney to ensure that the new language is legally defensible We have begun researching park dedication policies in other cities and have been gathering information from the League of Minnesota Cities to assist in these efforts. Revisiting all the assumptions that the park dedication ordinance is based on will take additional staff time and we expect to bring back additional information for Council consideration this fall. It is our understanding that the primary goal of this work effort to provide recommendations on the MUSA/non -MUSA park dedication issues and, based on that decision, revise the park dedication calculations as needed to ensure appropriate park dedication is required with each subdivision to ensure adequate land and funding for the ultimate park plan construction. Additional Steps Additionally, staff recommends that the City Council consider developing park dedication policies to address trail maintenance, park development and maintenance, etc. The City Attorney has opined that maintenance of all public park facilities, including trails, should be maintained by the City of Corcoran and a policy for maintenance should be established. We recommend gathering example policies from other communities and preparing a draft policy for Council consideration. While there is no urgency to this matter, it becomes increasingly important as development occurs and park land and trails easements are being deeded to the City. When the City Council is prepared to take on these additional action items, staff would be happy to discuss options with you and the Council and prepare a work plan for completion in 2015. If the City Council wishes to pursue these items is should be reflected in the 2015 budget. Ordinance Amendment for Sketch Plans July 24, 2014 • 3. Requested Action • This is an update only. No action is needed, but the Council may wish to provide additional staff direction. Attachment a. Draft summary of Park Dedication in other cities Ordinance Amendment for Sketch Plans July 24, 2014 Park Dedication Reauirements by City -- prepared July 15. 2014 Musa V Non City Percentage of Wnd Cash in lieu of land Maximum amount Musa Credit for Paving? Notes Corcoran *Rural /Ag Residential at Less than 3 units per acre requires 10% land Calculated at rate of required land percentages. *Maximum Fee per Yes No The existing Parks and Trails plans was developed on or equivalent market value residential unit in the MUSA the Met Council population forecast of 17,600 by *Low Density Residential at 3 -5 units per acre requires 11% land or 4,000.00 2030. Corcoran allows credit for private parks. equivalent market value *Medium - Density Residential at 6-8 units per acre requires 12% land *Maximum Fee per ' r equivalent market value residential unit outside the *Mixed Residential at 8 -10 units per acre requires 13% land or MUSA 3,000.00 equivalent market value *High - Density Residential and Mixed -Use at 10+ units per acre requires 14% land or equivalent market value *Commercial and Industrial requires 5% Plymouth An amount equal to the development's proportional share of the Allowed if park is not necessary. A maximum cash payment of No Distinction Developer is responsible for finished grading, In the case of outlots, the developer can provide park City Park System. $6,500 per dwelling unit for ground cover, and construction of trails. No dedication for the outlot and the platted land or only esidential development, or credit is given for this work, except the cost the platted land. Per–Ca pita Residential Share: 90 %of the existing park land and trail $8,000 per acre for of improving existing trails. acreage, divided by the City population as determined by the 2010 commercial/Ind Decennial Census (70,576). development or schools. I(90% X 1,432) / 70,576 = 0,0183 acres /capital Per Capita Commercial /Industrial Share: SO% of the existing park land and trail acreage, divided by the number ofjobs within the city. [(10% X 1,432) / 45,488 = 0,0031 acres /capital Medina In every subdivision of land, a reasonable portion of the buildable Residential subdivisions: the contribution of cash Maximum shall be $8,000 per No Distinction Not addressed in code Money is placed in a designated parks fund. land, not to exceed 10 percent in lieu shall be equal to eight percent of the value dwelling unit. ofthe land; Requires a minimum amount of $3,500 per dwelling unit Cash in lieu contributions shall be calculated on the average value ofthe unsubdivided land for which park dedication fees have not already been paid haled on fair market value no later than the time of final approval. Maple Grove Residential: Less than 9 units per acre requires a 10% dedication; Residential: 10% of fair market value as None Specified No Distinction Not addressed in code *Affordable units receive a 25% reduction; multiple greater than 9 units /acre requires 11 %of subdivision area plus an determined by the city family units with a 14 unit per acre minimum and a additional 1 percent for each additional dwelling unit per acre over minimum 8 units per structure receive a 20 % 9. Commercial: 7 %% of fair market value x acreage eduction Commercial: T/ %of the subdivision or development *Includes provisions for Private Open Space Rogers 30% of subdivision area Residential: Adopted by Ordinance None Specified No Distinction Not addressed in code Commercial /Industrial: 30% of the fair market value (FMV determined by the City). Hugo 0 -3.99 units per acre: 10 percent Commercial and Industrial: Exempt None Specified No Distinction Not addressed in code 4.00 -5.99 units per acre: 11 percent Residential: 2,400.00 $ per unit 6.00 -7.99 units per acre: 13 percent 8.00 -9.99 units per acre: 15 percent 10.00 < units . per acre: 17 percent Lake Elmo 10% -4 %, with residential developments demandingthe highest Required for subdivisions larger than 3lots. FMV None Specified No Distinction Not addressed in code Money is placed in a designated parks fund. aunt, and developments in rural residential and agricultural for the percentage land dedication for zoning . development demanding the least. district where the property is located. CC may require less than 3 parcels on a case by case basis. Minnetonka Not less than 10 percent of the total land in the proposed *Single dwellings: $5,000.00 per buildable lot None Specified No Distinction *Money is placed in a designated parks fund. subdivision. *Two - family and multiple dwellings: $5,000.00 per unit *The city council, at its discretion, may waive or .Office /industrial: $7,000.00 per acre reduce the requirements of this section when the *Commercial: $8,000.00 per acre subdivision includes a city- assisted development of redevelopment area or achieves some other public The city council may waive or reduce this fee if the purpose and the requirements would create a subdivision contributes to the city's affordable financial hardship for the project. housing goals or some other public purpose. Agenda Item L A N D F 0 R M From Site to Finish 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Suite 513 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 Minneapolis, MN 55401 www.landform.net TO: City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: July 15, 2014 for the July 24, 2014 for the City Council RE: Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead. Application for Site Plan, Rezoning and Variance for gravel parking lot and bathroom at 23475 County Road 10 (city file no. 14 -010) REVIEW DEADLINE: August 12, 2014 Application Request Three Rivers Park District is requesting city approval for a site plan application for the temporary installation of a gravel parking lot and bathroom at 23475 County Road 10. The applicant is also requesting approval of a rezoning from Transitional Rural Commercial (TCR) to Rural Commercial (CR) and a variance from the minimum lot size and setback requirements. Approval of the site plan, rezoning and variance requires a majority vote of the entire City Council. 2. Planning Commission Meeting The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their July 3rd meeting and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request, with the following conditions: 5 (g.) Revise the plans to add the "optional' urinal in the restroom. 5 (h.) Revise the plans to add trash containers in the restroom and outside near the trailhead parking. Trash container design must be approved by staff. In addition to the applicant, there were 2 residents who spoke at the public hearing. There were several questions raised by the Commissioners. The Planning Commissioners asked about the hours of operation. The indicated that there are no hours of operation posted and the restroom facility would remain open at all times. The Planning Commissioners asked whether the parking lot would be plowed in winter. The applicant responded that the trails and trail heads are not plowed in the winter. The trailhead is not officially closed at any time, but it would not be accessible in the winter and the restroom would not be maintained in the winter. Landform', SensiblyGreen and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. • • The commissioners noted that the site plans show an optional trash can and urinal on the interior of outhouse and asked whether they would be included. The applicant said they were not planning on putting it in, but that they could. The commissioners also asked about trash facilities on the building's exterior. The applicant responded that there are no plans for a trash can on the exterior. Tom Cossette asked why the trees on site were being removed. The applicant responded that the trees are being removed because they are dying or diseased and because it is the most efficient layout of the trail. There was additional discussion about tree preservation, but the Commission agreed that they did not have enough information to make a recommendation on the tree removal. The applicant indicated that he would review the trees on site and provide additional information prior to the Council meeting. Trish Krueger stated that she was there representing the Parks and Trails Commission and that they support the request. Additional Information Provided After The Mee Following the meeting, the applicant submitted additional information about the proposed exterior trash can for City review and approval. Staff recommends approval of the trash can design submitted. The applicant also indicated that they do not usually install waste receptacles inside the bathroom and requests that this condition be eliminated. The applicant submitted a revised landscaping /tree preservation plan that preserves one of the trees previously planned for removal. They will be removing 5 existing trees either to accommodate the new trail and relocated trail or because the trees are in poor health. Staff notes that the City of Corcoran has no tree preservation requirements. 3. Parks and Trails Commission Review The application was submitted to the Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission for review at the June 24, 2014 Parks and Trails Commission meeting. Comments from the Parks and Trails Commission are advisory in nature and non - binding. The Parks and Trails Commissioners unanimously recommended approval of the plan. 4. Context Background The applicant proposes to lease tax - forfeited land owned by Hennepin County to build a temporary trailhead for Lake Independence Regional Trail. Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead, Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance (city file 14 -010) July 24, 2014 0 Zoning and Land Use The property is currently guided Rural Service /Commercial and zoned Transitional Rural Commercial (TCR). Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties are guided Rural Service / Commercial and zoned TCR. Natural Characteristics of the Site 0 No significant natural resources have been identified in The 2030 Comprehensive Plan Natural Resource Inventory. Transportation /Access A paved east /west path will connect users to the Lake Independence Trail and a driveway will connect the Trailhead parking lot to CR 10. No major roadwork is anticipated. Parks, Trails and Sidewalks The Lake Independence Regional Trail is a North -South paved trail running parallel to County 19. It connects the Crow - Hassan Park Reserve, Baker Park Reserve and the Luce Line State Trail, which are maintained by Three Rivers Park District. The site plan shows that a snowmobile path and a paved path will connect users to the 15.87 mile trail. 5. Analysis Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and City policies. The City Engineer's comments are incorporated into this staff report and included as an attachment. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision - Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City must deny the rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed request meets the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the site plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead, Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance (city file 14 -010) July 24, 2014 • higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Rezoning The .84 acre (1.26 gross acres minus .42 acres of road ROW) property is guided Rural Service /Commercial in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and zoned TCR. The purpose of the TCR District is to provide a holding zone until a landowner makes application for development, at which time the City may rezone the affected property to CR, consistent with the land use plan. The applicant is requesting a rezoning from TCR to CR. The city must review this request for compliance with the standards of Section 1070, Subdivision 2: A. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed project is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan for Rural Service / Commercial areas that allow for contractor's yards and similar uses. B. The proposed action meets the purpose and intent of this Ordinance or, in the case of a map amendment, it meets the purpose and intent of the individual district. The planned parking lot, bathroom and trail connections are consistent with the intent of the CR District. The CR district was created to provide a mix of neighborhood commercial uses and rural industrial, such as contractor's yards and similar uses that do not require municipal water or sanitary sewer services. C. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed parking lot and vaulted bathroom. D. There is an adequate buffer or transition provided between potentially incompatible districts. The proposed project is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the surrounding properties. Site Plan The applicant is proposing a gravel parking lot, a bathroom, landscaping, a paved bike /walk trail connection and an unpaved snowmobile trail connection. The parking lot will provide 9 parking Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead, Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance (city file 14 -010) July 24, 2014 • • spaces on a gravel surface, with an additional paved handicap parking space and loading area to provide access to the bathroom. Section 1040.090 permits Civic uses in the CR District. Parking and related amenities for the Lake Independence Regional Trail is considered a permitted civic use. The City must review this site plan application for compliance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Public Safety Review Plans were sent to the fire department on June 11'". There were no comments from the Fire Chief and Fire Marshal regarding public safety as of the date of this report. Well and Septic The applicant will need to apply for a well and septic permit at Hennepin County, and provide a copy of the approved permit to the City prior to construction. Parking lot Sec. 1060.60 of the Zoning Ordinance permits gravel parking lots in the CR district, if all of the following standards are met: 1. The City Engineer has reviewed the grading plan and finds that surface water is managed in compliance with City and State requirements. The City Engineer noted that the proposed grading shows that drainage is flowing to one point at the southeastern portion of the parking lot. The applicant will need to adjust the final grading to create sheet flow to the south similar to existing conditions. The City Engineer's comments are attached. 2. A dust control program is provided by the landowner and approved by the City Council. The applicant will control dust using a calcium chloride dust control product on an as- needed basis. 3. Handicapped accessible routes are provided on site in compliance with State and Federal requirements. Paved handicapped parking and trail access is provided in compliance with State and Federal requirements. 4. The gravel parking areas are fully screened to a height of 3 feet from the public streets and adjoining properties. Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead, Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance (city file 14 -010) July 24, 2014 • • The gravel parking area is fully screened on the north and south perimeter of the parking area. Landscaping on the eastern perimeter is not shown on the site plan; however, aerial photos show that there is significant vegetation on the neighboring residential lot that should provide an adequate visual barrier. 5. The commercial development requiring the parking is seasonal in nature (operates 9 months or less per calendar year). The proposed Trailhead is a temporary recreational use, not a commercial use. Staff does not anticipate high usage of the parking lot in the winter months. 6. Landscaped areas equal to 10 percent of the lot area shall be provided in parking lots that contain space for 50 or more cars. Section 1060 (Performance Standards) Page 225 December 19, 2011 The parking provides fewer than 50 parking spaces for cars; therefore, this standard does not apply. 7. When an existing business expands its structure by 10 percent or more or a change in use creates the need for additional parking spaces, the entire parking area shall be upgraded to meet the provisions contained within this subdivision. This is a new parking lot; therefore, this standard does not apply. 8. Areas designed for storage purposes only, which are fenced and properly screened, may be permitted to utilize other durable and dustless surface materials subject to the approval of the City Council. Storage will not be provided on site; therefore, this standard does not apply 9. Off - Street Loading Areas. Loading areas established after March 23, 2004 shall be prohibited within 300 feet of residentially zoned or guided property unless completely screened by an intervening building. Loading areas not requiring screening by an intervening building shall be screened from adjacent residentially zoned or guided property by the use of berms, fences, or walls to provide 100 percent opacity to a height of at least 10 feet. The height of the screening shall be measured from the grade of the loading areas. An off - street loading area is not proposed, therefore, this standard does not apply. Bathroom The proposed 95- square foot, unisex bathroom will be constructed of tilt -up concrete walls, which meets the building standards in Section 1060.050 of the zoning ordinance. The bathroom Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead, Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance (city file 14 -010) July 24, 2014 • • includes a vented vault for waste collection. The applicant will be required to obtain a septic permit from Hennepin County. Hennepin County reviewed the plans and noted that the permit application must include pumping schedule for review and approval. A copy of the permit must be provided to the city prior to issuance of a building permit. Landscaping In addition to landscaping requirements for gravel parking lots, Section 1060.070 sets standards for general landscaping. The standards of 1060.070, 2 (G) (Landscaping for Non - residential Uses) require that the number of trees and shrubs be calculated based on gross floor building area or the site's perimeter, whichever is more. In this case, the perimeter of the site is greater than the building's floor area. A comparison of the required trees and shrubs required for the site is shown in the below table: Ordinance requires the One overstory tree per 1,000 square feet one tree per 50 lineal feet of greater of: of gross building floor area plus One site perimeter plus one tree understory shrub for each 300 square feet per 30 lineal feet of site of building perimeter Total Required 92 square feet/1,000 square feet = 1 tree 946 feet/50 feet = 19 trees 92 square feet/300 square feet = 1 shrub 946 feet/30 feet = 31 trees Total Proposed 1 tree + 25 shrubs (7 existing trees preserved) The proposed plan shows 1 new tree and 25 shrubs, which exceeds the standards for building area, but does not meet the greater requirements for site perimeter. The City Council has approved flexibility in the applicability of these requirements in the past where the larger requirement was unreasonable. Because of temporary nature of the use and significant difference in the standards for trees and shrubs based on the site perimeter or the building area, staff finds that the proposed plan meets the intent of the standards. Staff recommends approval of a variance, discussed in the variance section of the staff report. Signs The site plan shows that a Trailhead Parking Lot sign will be installed on the Northwest side of the parking lot entrance. Chapter 84.07 of the City Code requires all signs to be set back 10' from the right of way. This standard is not met. The applicant will need to move the sign to the appropriate setback to meet the standards of the code. Lighting No lighting is proposed on site. If lighting is to be provided in the future, the applicant must submit a lighting plan for city review and approval. Variance The applicant is requesting a variance from the required 100 foot principal structure setback from the right of way of major roadways and a variance from the required landscaping minimum. Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead, Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance (city file 14 -010) July 24, 2014 ! While the applicant requested a variance from the minimum lot size of 2.5 acres, staff finds that the lot is a legal, nonconforming lot of record and does not require a variance. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all of the following criteria have been met: 1. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. There are practical difficulties for the applicant in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The setback requirements cannot be met because the size and shape of the parcel is smaller than the required minimums. The project site is 0.84 acres, with a lot depth of 99.31 feet along County Road 10, and a lot depth of 95.66 feet from County Road 10. Given these dimensions, the applicant cannot construct the project on the existing lot according to the provisions of the Ordinance. The required landscaping requirements are not practical for a temporary use of the site and the trail crossings within the parcel. 2. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The conditions upon which the variance requests are based are unique to this parcel due to the legal nonconforming lot size and the temporary nature of the use. 3. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed parking lot for the Trailhead is consistent with the character of the locality. The parking lot provides greater access to the existing Lake Independence Trail and maintains the rural service character of the intersection. The proposed landscaping enhances the vegetative cover and appearance of the site. 4. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The proposed project is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The proposed use as a parking lot with a bathroom is a civic use that increases park and trail access to area residents. The proposed site landscaping significantly increases the number of trees on site and effectively screens potential headlight nuisances. 5. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, maintains the rural character of the site, and enhances parks and trail amenities for Corcoran residents. Summary The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request with several conditions. One condition requires a trash container inside the restroom and another outside. The applicant has Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead, Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance (city file 14 -010) July 24, 2014 • • agreed to the outside trash container and revised the plans to reflect that, but requests that the interior container not be required. Staff has prepared a staff report that reflects the planning commission recommendation. However, if the Council finds that the trash container inside the restroom is not required, the Council should revise Resolution 2014 -40 to delete condition 5(h). 6. Action Move to adopt the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: a. Ordinance approving a rezoning b. Resolution approving findings of fact for rezoning c. Resolution approving the site plan and variance Attachments a. Ordinance 2014 -284 approving a rezoning b. Resolution 2014 -39 approving findings of fact for rezoning c. Resolution 2014 -40 approving a site plan and variance d. Aerial Location Map e. City Engineer's Memo, dated June 18, 2014 f. Applicant's Narrative, dated, May 20, 2014 g. Applicant's Narrative, dated June 13, 2014 h. Plans dated June 13, 2014 i. Email from applicant dated July 9, 2014 j. Trash graphics dated July 7, 2014 k. Revised graphics dated July 9, 2014 Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead, Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance (city file 14 -010) July 24, 2014 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -284 Motion By: Seconded By: July 24, 2014 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT 23475 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 18- 119- 23 -12- 0002) (CITY FILE 14 -010) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Corcoran Zoning Map from TCR (Transitional Rural Commercial) to CR (Rural Commercial) with respect to the .84 -acre parcel, legally described as follows: That part of the Northwest X of the Northeast X of Section 18, Township 119 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Y4 Section Post between Section 7 and Section 18 in Township 119, Range 23; thence South along X Section line 23 rods; thence East 7 rods 13 X feet; thence North 14 rods; thence West 2 rods and 3 feet; thence North 8 % rods; thence West 5 % rods and 2 feet to place of beginning, EXCEPTING therefrom the South 8 rods thereof. And that part of the Northeast X of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing 92.75 feet East of the Northwest corner of Northeast X of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23; thence South 8 rods; thence East 88.5 feet; thence North 8 rods; thence West 88.5 feet to place of beginning. Subject to road. And all that part of the Northeast X of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of said1 14 Section distant 10 rods and 16 X feet East of the Northwest corner of said X Section; thence South 8 rods; thence East 7 X rods; thence North 8 rods to the North line of said % Section; thence West along said North line 7 % rods to the point of beginning, subject to road. Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon adoption of the resolution approving the site plan for this project. Page 1 of 2 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -284 VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron July 24, 2014 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 24th day of July 2014. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 2 of 2 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -39 Motion By: Seconded By: July 24, 2014 APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING PROPERTY AT 23475 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 18- 119 -23 -12 -0002) (CITY FILE 14 -010) WHEREAS, Three Rivers Park District ( "the applicant ") has requested reclassification of the zoning from TCR (Transitional Rural Commercial) to CR (Rural Commercial) with respect to the .84 -acre parcel, legally described as follows: That part of the Northwest % of the Northeast '4 of Section 18, Township 119 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Section Post between Section 7 and Section 18 in Township 119, Range 23; thence South along X Section line 23 rods; thence East 7 rods 13 X feet; thence North 14 rods; thence West 2 rods and 3 feet; thence North 8 % rods; thence West 5 % rods and 2 feet to place of beginning, EXCEPTING therefrom the South 8 rods thereof. And that part of the Northeast % of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing 92.75 feet East of the Northwest corner of Northeast % of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23; thence South 8 rods; thence East 88.5 feet; thence North 8 rods; thence West 88.5 feet to place of beginning. Subject to road. And all that part of the Northeast % of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of said1 14 Section distant 10 rods and 16 X feet East of the Northwest corner of said % Section; thence South 8 rods; thence East 7 % rods; thence North 8 rods to the North line of said X Section; thence West along said North line 7 % rods to the point of beginning, subject to road. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcel from TCR to CR; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the request by Three Rivers Park District for the reclassification of the zoning from TCR to CR for the .84 -acre property, based on the following findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan for Rural Service /Commercial areas. 2. The planned parking lot, bathroom and trail connections are consistent with the intent of the CR District. The CR district was created to provide a mix of civic, neighborhood commercial uses and rural industrial uses that do not require municipal water or sanitary sewer services. Page 1 of 2 City of Corcoran July 24, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -39 3. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed parking lot and vaulted bathroom. 4. The proposed project is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the surrounding properties. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 24th day of July 2014. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 2 of 2 City Seal City of Corcoran July 24, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -40 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR THE LAKE INDEPENDENCE REGIONAL TRAIL TRAILHEAD AND BATHROOM AT 23475 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 18- 119 -23 -12 -0002) (CITY FILE 14 -010) WHEREAS, Three Rivers Park District is requesting approval of a site plan and variance to allow construction of a gravel parking lot and bathroom on property legally described as follows: That part of the Northwest X of the Northeast % of Section 18, Township 119 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Section Post between Section 7 and Section 18 in Township 119, Range 23; thence South along X Section line 23 rods; thence East 7 rods 13 X feet; thence North 14 rods; thence West 2 rods and 3 feet; thence North 8 % rods; thence West 5 % rods and 2 feet to place of beginning, EXCEPTING therefrom the South 8 rods thereof. And that part of the Northeast % of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing 92.75 feet East of the Northwest corner of Northeast % of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23; thence South 8 rods; thence East 88.5 feet; thence North 8 rods; thence West 88.5 feet to place of beginning. Subject to road. And all that part of the Northeast % of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of said1 14 Section distant 10 rods and 16 % feet East of the Northwest corner of said % Section; thence South 8 rods; thence East 7 % rods; thence North 8 rods to the North line of said X Section; thence West along said North line 7 % rods to the point of beginning, subject to road. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan and variances at a duly called public meeting and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a site plan, subject to the following findings and conditions: Site plan approval is granted to allow a gravel parking lot, bathroom, and associated site improvements, in accordance with the plans received by the City on June 13, 2014 and revisions dated July 7, 2014 and July 19, 2014, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval of this resolution is contingent upon approval of rezoning the property from TCR to CR. 3. Variances to allow a 22' 1" front yard setback along County Road 10 where 100 feet is required and to reduce the required landscaping are approved, subject to the following findings: a. There are practical difficulties for the applicant in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The setback requirements cannot be met because the size and shape of the parcel is smaller than the required minimums. The project site is .84 acres, with a lot depth of 99.31 feet along County Road 10, and a lot depth of 95.66 feet from County Road 10. Page 1 of 3 City of Corcoran July 24, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -40 Given these dimensions, the applicant cannot construct the project on the existing lot according to the provisions of the Ordinance. The required landscaping requirements are not practical for a temporary use of the site and the trail crossings within the parcel. b. The conditions upon which the variance requests are based are unique to this parcel due to the legal nonconforming lot size. c. The proposed parking lot for the Trailhead is consistent with the character of the locality. The parking lot provides greater access to the existing Lake Independence Trail and maintains the rural service character of the intersection. The proposed landscaping enhances the vegetative cover and appearance of the site. d. The proposed project is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The proposed use as a parking lot with a bathroom is a civic use that increases a service amenity to residents in the area. The proposed site landscaping significantly increases the number of trees on site and effectively screens potential headlight nuisances. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, maintains the rural character of the site, and enhances parks and trail amenities for Corcoran residents. 4. A gravel parking lot and bathroom is approved as shown on the plans. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/landowner must: a. Record the approving resolution at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. b. The applicant shall comply with all comments from the June 18, 2014 memo from the City Engineer. c. If site lighting (either on the building or freestanding) is proposed, it must comply with Section 1060.040 of the Zoning Ordinance. d. The Trailhead entrance sign must comply with the 10 foot sign setback standards of Chapter 84.07 of the City Code. e. The applicant shall obtain septic approval from Hennepin County and provide a copy of the approval to the City. f. The applicant shall obtain appropriate well permits and provide a copy of the approval to the City, if a new well is proposed. g. The "optional" urinal in the restroom must be constructed as shown on the site plan. The applicant should revise the plans to reflect this change. h. Plans should be revised to provide a trash receptacle inside the restroom. 6. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use. Page 2 of 3 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -40 VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron July 24, 2014 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 24th day of July 2014. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 3 of 3 City Seal 6/17/2014 Hle�n,r,,-,n i Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map 1 Parcel Map Scale: 1 "= 100 ft. N 18- 119 -23 -12 -0002 A -T -B: Abstract ID: Print Date: 6/17/2014 Owner Hennepin County Market $0 Name: Total: Parcel 23475 Co Rd No 10 Tax $0.00 Address: Corcoran, MN 55357 Total: (Payable: 2014) Property Vacant Land - Residential Sale $165,500 Type: Price: This map is compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with Home- Sale no representation or warranty expressed or stead: Non - Homestead Date: 12/1999 implied, including fitnessof any particular purpose, merchantability, orthe accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.85 acres Sale Area: 37,000 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 AL 7!H;. 6 f_ -I http: //g is.co.hennepi n.mn.us /Property /pri nt/default.aspx?C= 450094 .69098636124,4996797.811791581 &L =8 &T= hybrid &D = true &LI D =0 &F ID= 1811923120002 &VIS... 1/2 Wenck Engineers • Scientists Business Professionals Three Rivers Trailhead Review TO: Kendra Lindahl, City Planner FROM: Kent Torve, P.E., City Engineer DATE: June 18, 2014 SUBJECT: Trailhead for Three Rivers Park District Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0249 800 - 472 -2232 (763) 479 -4200 Fax(763)479 -4242 wenckmp @wenck.com www.wenck.com Background Three Rivers is creating a trail head for access at the CR 10 and CR 19 intersection. The project will create 0.15 acres of impervious surface, on a 0.57 acre site. Stormwater • Existing conditions survey shows sheet flow to the south into cultivated field • Applicant shall perform final grading to create sheet flow similar to existing conditions. o Point discharge (swale, etc.) should be avoided to minimize impacts to adjacent properties. Access Access permit will be required from County. \ \mspfsv02.lps.local \Studios \Planning & Infrastructure Studio \City of Corcoran \COR14010 -Three Rivers Park \2014 -06 -18 city engineers memo Trailhead Three Rivers.docx i nreeRivers PARK DISTRICT 'Y� ey May 20, 2014 Three Rivers Park d of tY Board of City of Corcoran Commissioners Attn: Brad Martens 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 F RE: Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead Parking Lot & CXT Bathroom Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance Application Dear Mr. Martens: The Park District is submitting plans for Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance approval for the Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead Parking Lot & CXT Bathroom in the City of Corcoran at the southeast corner of County Road 10 and County Road 19. The project includes a gravel parking lot with bituminous accessible parking, a L paved connection between the Lake Independence Regional Trail and parking lot, and a CXT bathroom. The application includes the Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance Checklists, plans, and project information in this letter. The permitting fees have been waived and the $2000 escrow is included with the application. Site Plan Application Item 7: u- The property is owned by Hennepin County and will be leased to the Three Rivers Park District to construct the parking lot and CXT Bathroom. The property was tax forfeited. Aggregate Parking Lot Dust Control: The gravel parking lot is allowed based on the City Zoning Ordinance (1060.060; Subd 3.B). Dust from the gravel parking lot will be controlled utilizing a chemical dust control product, calcium chloride, on an as needed basis. Rezoning Application Item 4: The property is currently zoned as Transitional Rural Commercial (TCR), which represents a transition area for future development as part of the Rural Commercial (CR) District. The Park District requests the site be rezoned from TCR to CR. The property will be used for the trailhead parking lot and CXT bathroom for the Lake Independence Regional Trail. The adjacent properties are zoned both CR and TCR. Property uses consist of residential, agriculture, and commercial. Administrative Center, 3000 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 Information 763.559.9000 • TTY 763.559.6719 • Fax 763.559.3287 • www.ThrecRiversParks.org The project will benefit the adjacent businesses by providing parking for the Lake Independence Regional Trail. Currently, trail users park at the commercial property's, gas station and casting distributor, parking lot north of the project site. There should not be an impact on traffic since trail users are currently using the adjacent businesses' parking stalls to access the trail. Permanent environmental impacts were not identified. During construction, Best Management Practices will be used to control site erosion. Item 7: The property is owned by Hennepin County and will be leased to the Three Rivers Park District to construct the parking lot and CXT Bathroom. The property was tax forfeited. Variance Application Item 4: The project site is 0.84 acres. The site depth along County Road 10 is 99.31 feet and 95.66 feet from County Road 19. The CR District has a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres and a 100 foot setback from the Right -of -Way. The project site does not meet minimum lot size requirements and the setbacks cannot be met because the lot depth is less than the minimum setback for the CR District. The Park District requests a variance for the minimum lot size, parking lot setback, and civic building setback from the Right -of -Way. If the variances are not granted, the project may not be completed because the site does not comply with the CR District. The granting of the variance will not negatively affect public welfare or other parcels in the CR District or neighborhood. The project is an amenity for the community, adding a parking location to access the Lake Independence Regional Trail along County Road 19, Item 7: The property is owned by Hennepin County and will be leased to the Three Rivers Park District to construct the parking lot and CXT Bathroom. The property was tax forfeited. Item 9: The Park District requests that a performance bond or irrevocable letter of credit not be provided with the Variance Application, but be provided at the time of construction. As part of awarding the construction contract, the Park District requires the contractor to provide a performance bond for the entire contract amount. The Park District will provide the City of Corcoran a copy of the performance bond at the time of contract award. Sincerely, r� Josh Bowe PE, LEED° AP BD +C Civil Engineer Three Rivers Park District 7'hreeRivers PARK DISTRICT Dear Mr. Martens: Jennifer DeJournett District 2 The Park District is submitting revised plans and a narrative for Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance approval for the Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead Parking Lot & CXT Bathroom in the City of Corcoran at the southeast Daniel Freeman, corner of County Road 10 and County Road 19. The project includes a gravel Vice Chair parking lot with bituminous accessible parking, a paved connection between the District 3 Lake Independence Regional Trail and parking lot, and a CXT bathroom. Items needed to complete the application John Gunyou, Chair Item 1 District 4 See the Existing Drainage Condition, Proposed Drainage Condition, and Aerial Exhibits. John Gibbs Item 2 District 5 The sign along the parking lot entrance drive is a 24 "x24" steel sign on metal post stating" Three Rivers Park District Trailhead Parking Lot. The sign will be set back Larry Blackstad 10 feet from the property line. Lighting will not be provided for any site signage. Appointed At Large Item 3 The CXT Bathroom's walls and roof are precast concrete. This complies with the Steve Antolak standards in Section 1060.050, Subdivision 1(C)1.d. Appointed At Large Cris Gears Superintendent Administrative Center, 3000 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 Information 763.559.9000 • TTY 763.559.6719 • Fax 763.559.3287 • www.ThreeRiversParks.org June 13, 2014 Three Rivers Park District Board of City of Corcoran Commissioners Attn: Brad Martens 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Penny Steele District 1 RE: Additional Information Request for Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead Parking Lot & CXT Bathroom Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance Application Dear Mr. Martens: Jennifer DeJournett District 2 The Park District is submitting revised plans and a narrative for Site Plan, Rezoning, and Variance approval for the Lake Independence Regional Trail Trailhead Parking Lot & CXT Bathroom in the City of Corcoran at the southeast Daniel Freeman, corner of County Road 10 and County Road 19. The project includes a gravel Vice Chair parking lot with bituminous accessible parking, a paved connection between the District 3 Lake Independence Regional Trail and parking lot, and a CXT bathroom. Items needed to complete the application John Gunyou, Chair Item 1 District 4 See the Existing Drainage Condition, Proposed Drainage Condition, and Aerial Exhibits. John Gibbs Item 2 District 5 The sign along the parking lot entrance drive is a 24 "x24" steel sign on metal post stating" Three Rivers Park District Trailhead Parking Lot. The sign will be set back Larry Blackstad 10 feet from the property line. Lighting will not be provided for any site signage. Appointed At Large Item 3 The CXT Bathroom's walls and roof are precast concrete. This complies with the Steve Antolak standards in Section 1060.050, Subdivision 1(C)1.d. Appointed At Large Cris Gears Superintendent Administrative Center, 3000 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 Information 763.559.9000 • TTY 763.559.6719 • Fax 763.559.3287 • www.ThreeRiversParks.org Items needed to be addressed. but did not make the Mav 20. 2014 aoDlication incomplete Item 1 The owner information is: Jim Grube Hennepin County 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 Item 2 The bituminous ADA stall will have permanent pavement striping. The gravel parking stalls will defined with temporary paint. The painted stalls will indicate parking layout during the first couple of months and repeat users will understand how to park. The ADA stall with permanent striping will show new users the parking orientation. The parking stalls are 9' by 18.5'. Item 3 Screening will be provided on the north and south side of the parking lot. Planting information is provided on the revised plans. Item 4 We have eliminated the reforestation planting from the project. Sincerely, Josh Bowe PE, LEED® AP BD +C Civil Engineer Three Rivers Park District Enclosures: City of Corcoran Information Request, dated June 9, 2014 Three Rivers Park District Application Narrative, dated May 20, 2014 0.27 ON M N Q� O N Ln 0 rs V) 0 ro N t L O d' J i C is N m 0 ro N ro L O T__1 ry U O ry O J i fo L (o C 0 0) N V7 H LU 0 d n EXISTING, TYP. PROPOSED, TYP THE DRAWINGS ARE THE GRAPHIC AND PICTORIAL PORTIONS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHOWING THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND DIMENSIONS OF THE WORK. DISCREPANCIES IN LINE AND SYMBOL COLOR, WEIGHT, OR CLARITY MAY EXIST. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE DRAWINGS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BID PLACEMENT, AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES THAT MAY AFFECT THE EXTENT OF WORK. LOCATION MAP Farm -Hmstd (House & 1 Acre) Commercial To Z IP r� Residential Fa rrn M X-4-1 UTILITY SYMBOLS LEGEND G001 ABBREVIATIONS CIVIL c- z, `' -. ,oaFnmerci C CATION e 0 — T''' Commercial - =COUNT 'OADAO :` acant Land - Residentia Vacan Land - Resh errtla i9 Residential LAKE.IN DEPEND ENCE RT RcLu- arm V�a[?:toi n't'�- lftmfeG imm� g - v $i. LIIS :dS2R'IYQ� _s Rscomi Tice. Cl� L Ukre T %T 8 vd p. I).Mg - Th'p t6. 494- I Wim*-$M 7hreeRivers PARK DISTRICT Lake Independence Regional Trail Tra*11head iz l f mercW rn Ft^6 sc � r Residential Farm -Hmstd (House & 1 Acre) x� ffjj rf1 0 600 Feet Fi m-Hmstd (1§9se & 1 Ac?` j '�.nie4ie R' St. cloud N NEPIN NTY Lake Independence Regional Trail Corcoran, MN TLI 1401 PLAN SYMBOLS LEGEND UTILITY SYMBOLS LEGEND G001 ABBREVIATIONS CIVIL C001 SITE LAYOUT V101 REGISTERED LAND SURVEY ABBREVIATIONS COMMON TO THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PARK BOUNDARY TYPICAL SECTIONS ELECTRIC, UNSPECIFIED (ALL TYPES) CONSTRUCTION PLANS E CROSS SECTIONS ARE PRESENT IN THE DRAWINGS. THE FOLLOWING ABBREVIATION COUNTY BOUNDARY BUILDING UNDERGROUND CABLE G -02 E(UG) LIST MAY NOT BE COMPREHENSIVE OF ALL ABBREVIATIONS USED. CITY /MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY FLOOR PLAN OVERHEAD CABLE E(OH THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO READ AND UNDERSTAND PRIVATE BOUNDARY — E E ALL ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMINOLOGY IN THE DRAWINGS RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE ROW MANHOLE, METER, PEDESTAL OE e e ® AND CONTACT THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AS NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION /GRADING EASEMENT RESOURCE PROTECTION EASEMENT LIGHT, POLE LIGHT, MARKER POST E -*- ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION. TRANSPORTATION EASEMENT AIA AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS UTILITY EASEMENT FUEL, UNSPECIFIED (ALL TYPES) F ARCH ARCHITECT PROPERTY SETBACK LINE GASOLINE /REFINED PETROLEUM GAS ASCE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS RAILROAD TRACKS GEOTHERMAL GEOT BLDG BUILDING TRANSPORTATION CENTERLINE – HVAC /CONDENSATE HVAC BO BOTTOM OF UNKNOWN LINEAR FEATURE (SEE LABEL) ? NATURAL GAS NGAS BP BID PACKAGE GATE, UNSPECIFIED OIL /UNREFINED PETROLEUM OIL CD CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AUTOMATIC VEHICLE ACCESS / / /AUTO // /AUTO /// STEAM STEAM— CIP CAST IN PLACE OR CAST IRON PIPE MANUAL VEHICLE ACCESS / / /VEHL / / /VEHL /// F F CONC CONCRETE BICYCLE ACCESS / / /BIKE / //BIKE /// MANHOLE, METER, PEDESTAL OF e ® CONT CONTINUOUS DOG OFF -LEASH ACCESS FENCE, UNSPECIFIED / / / /DOG / / / / / / /DOG /// UNDERGROUND TANK, MARKER POST F FUEL ® CMP CMU CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT FENCE, SPECIFIED TYPE X F F CT CONTRACTION JOINT BW = BARBED WIRE BW VALVE (ANY), VENT D4 DETL DETAIL CL = CHAIN LINK CL PS DIA DIAMETER PS = POST AND SPINDLE TELECOM, UNSPECIFIED (ALL TYPES) —COM DIM DIMENSION SR = SPLIT RAIL SR UNDERGROUND CABLE COM(UG) DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE WW = WOVEN WIRE X WW OVERHEAD CABLE —COM(OH) DN DOWN ELEC = ELECTRIC v ELEC UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC F /O(UG) EA EACH POLE, W/ GUY ANCHOR OVERHEAD FIBER OPTIC _F/O(OH) EJ EXPANSION JOINT POST OR BOLLARD, GRILL ® ® C EL, ELEV ELEVATION GUARDRAIL MANHOLE, METER © e ENG ENGINEER HANDRAIL C C EX, EXIST EXISTING SIGN W/ SINGLE, DOUBLE POST ID ID PEDESTAL, MARKER POST ® ® EXT EXTERIOR ID = SIGN CODE EW EACH WAY WATER, UNSPECIFIED (ALL TYPES) FES FLARED END SECTION TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR (MAJOR) W W FO FACE OF TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR (MINOR) MANHOLE, METER, PEDESTAL O (9 ® FTG FOOTING W W FV FIELD VERIFY DITCH OR SWALE BOTTOM (FLOW LINE) —.>. MARKER POST, CLEANOUT ® 49) GALV GALVANIZED DRAINAGE ARROW (FLOW DIRECTION) > W W W HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE EDGE OF NORMAL WATER LEVEL — — VALVE (ANY), CHECK, CONTROL HT HEIGHT FLOODPLAIN LINE FP W ID INSIDE DIAMETER WETLAND EDGE, UNSPECIFIED CURB BOX, HYDRANT, WELL b Q INSP INSPECTION OR INSPECTOR WETLAND EDGE, DELINEATED D INT INTERIOR DRINKING FOUNTAIN INV INVERT CONIFEROUS TREELINE JT JOINT DECIDUOUS TREELINE IRRIGATION, UNSPECIFIED (ALL TYPES) LOC LOCATION MANHOLE, METER, PEDESTAL n MAX MAXIMUM TREE, CONIFEROUS AND DECIDUOUS ® O e I ® MIN MINIMUM MN MINNESOTA SHRUB OR BRUSH O MARKER POST, CLEANOUT ® C NIC NOT IN CONTRACT PLANT IDENTIFICATION LABEL �.�f Common Name (Qty) VALVE (ANY), CISTERN I Da IRR NOM NTS NOMINAL NOT TO SCALE Scientific Name I 0 OC ON CENTER PROTECT (TREE) SPRINKLER HEAD, WELL OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER OH OVERHEAD REMOVE (TREE) SANITARY SEWER, UNSPECIFIED _SS PC PRECAST y GRAVITY PIPING FN PH PHASE CLEAR BRUSH (W /IN TREELINE) FORCEMAIN PIPING PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PLASTIC) PIPE SILT FENCE, STANDARD n n n MANHOLE, MARKER, CLEANOUT SS SS ® SS 4) R, RAID REC RADIUS RECOMMENDED SILT FENCE, HEAVY DUTY SS RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE FLOATING SILT CURTAIN LIFT STATION, SEPTIC TANK, VENT LS SEP REINF REINFORCEMENT STEEL BAR BIOROLL SS SS SS REQ REQUIRED ROOT BARRIER VALVE (ANY), CHECK, CONTROL Da ►4 f>H SECT SECTION STD STANDARD ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE RCE STORM SEWER, UNSPECIFIED TEMP TEMPORARY DRAIN TILE - >> – >> - TO TOP OF PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP S S TYP TYPICAL IRON MONUMENT, CONTROL POINT MANHOLE, MARKER, CLEANOUT QS ® C UG VCP UNDERGROUND VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE CATCH BASIN (SQUARE, ROUND) CB CB ® BENCHMARK, 2" IRON MONUMENT B O 1 VERT VFY VERTICAL VERIFY APRON, W/ GRATE, VALVE (ANY) fin// WITH TEST PIT W/O WITHOUT PLAN SYMBOL NOTES 1. SEE MATERIALS LEGEND FOR TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SEEDING, AND SODDING SYMBOL HATCH PATTERNS GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS: THE 2014 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINNESOTA MUTCD INCLUDING THE FIELD MANUAL TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS DRAWING INDEX GENERAL May 15, 2014 APPROVED: PROJECT MANAGER, THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT May 15, 2014 APPROVED: SENIOR MANAGER OF ENGINEERING DATE OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT NOT REQUIRED APPROVED: DIRECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT NOT REQUIRED APPROVED: SUPERINTENDENT DATE THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT NOT REQUIRED APPROVED: AGENCY OR PERSON DATE NOT REQUIRED APPROVED: AGENCY OR PERSON DATE DESIGN ORGANIZATION: DESIGN DESIGNATION: DESIGN EXCEPTIONS: REVISIONS POST CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT STATION DESCRIPTION MARK DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FINAL FIELD REVISIONS, IF ANY, WERE PREPARED BY t4obbillft,41, SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PEDESTRIAN PATH - PARK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DESIGN SPEED: 7hreeRivers STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE BASED ON: PARK DISTRICT HEIGHT OF EYE _ NAME STOPPING DISTANCE ^ NAME DEPARTMENT OF DESIGN DATE :5/15/2014 REG. NO.: DATE: REG. NO.: COVER SHEET G001 GENERAL NOTES CIVIL C001 SITE LAYOUT V101 REGISTERED LAND SURVEY C201 DEMO /EROSION CONTROL C301 TYPICAL SECTIONS C601 CONSTRUCTION PLANS C701 CROSS SECTIONS C801 DETAILS BUILDING G -02 BUILDING ELEVATIONS G -03 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS G -04 FLOOR PLAN May 15, 2014 APPROVED: PROJECT MANAGER, THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT May 15, 2014 APPROVED: SENIOR MANAGER OF ENGINEERING DATE OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT NOT REQUIRED APPROVED: DIRECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT NOT REQUIRED APPROVED: SUPERINTENDENT DATE THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT NOT REQUIRED APPROVED: AGENCY OR PERSON DATE NOT REQUIRED APPROVED: AGENCY OR PERSON DATE DESIGN ORGANIZATION: DESIGN DESIGNATION: DESIGN EXCEPTIONS: REVISIONS POST CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT STATION DESCRIPTION MARK DATE DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FINAL FIELD REVISIONS, IF ANY, WERE PREPARED BY t4obbillft,41, SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PEDESTRIAN PATH - PARK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DESIGN SPEED: 7hreeRivers STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE BASED ON: PARK DISTRICT HEIGHT OF EYE _ NAME STOPPING DISTANCE ^ NAME DEPARTMENT OF DESIGN DATE :5/15/2014 REG. NO.: DATE: REG. NO.: 2 47 M N O N Ln a) 0 .1 0) vi ° Q) ru L O J Cz +s a� ° m i 0 N fu L O ry U rn U O d- J L Cz O O Q) ry i Cn U w r1 ry a r-; GENERAL NOTES: PROJECT: LAKE INDEPENDENCE REGIONAL TRAIL TRAILEAD IN CORCORAN, MN OWNER: THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT PROJECT MANAGER:JOSH BOWE, CIVIL ENGINEER PARK MAINTENANCE: SCOTT SCHMIDT 3000 XENIUM LANE NORTH THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT SUPERVISOR THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 -1299 3000 XENIUM LANE NORTH PHONE: 612- 490 -0843 PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 -1299 EMAIL: SSCHMIDT @THREERIVERS PAR KDISTRICT.ORG PHONE: 763 - 694 -2063 FAX: 763 - 557 -5248 EMAIL: JBOWE @THREERIVERSPARKDISTRICT.ORG 1. THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL FIELD SURVEYING. A MINIMUM NOTICE OF 48 HOURS SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY SURVEY REQUEST. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS IN PROTECTING SURVEY STAKING FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAY WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE BY THE OWNER. THE WORK ZONE SHALL BE KEPT AS MINIMAL AS POSSIBLE DURING CONSTRUCTION. MOVEMENT AND PARKING OF EQUIPMENT SHALL STAY WITHIN WORK ZONE AND NOT CROSS AREAS OTHERWISE UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, TREES, SITE AMENITIES, ETC. FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO WORK OUTSIDE OF DRIP ZONE OF TREES, EXCEPT IN AREAS AS DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE, AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 4. STOCKPILE LOCATIONS, MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT STORAGE LOCATIONS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED WITH OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION ON THESE PLANS IS DEPICTED TO UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL "D ". THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI /ASCE 38 -02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 6. THE EXACT LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SUCH AS GAS, TELEPHONE, FIBEROPTIC, ELECTRONIC, CABLE TV, AND PIPE LINES ARE UNKNOWN. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE 216D AND RULES CHAPTER 7560, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION: ](800)252-1166. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD EXPECT TO FIND TELEPHONE LINES, ELECTRIC LINES, GAS MAIN, AND OTHER PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE WORK. TO THE EXTENT RECEIVED BY THE OWNER, AND FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR ONLY, THE DRAWINGS DEPICT OPERATOR - PROVIDED INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE VARIOUS UTILITIES THROUGH A DESIGN LOCATE REQUEST. IF THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN OPERATOR - PROVIDED UTILITY INFORMATION AND THE UTILITY INFORMATION DEPICTED IN THE DRAWINGS, THE OPERATOR - PROVIDED INFORMATION SHALL CONTROL. THE OWNER DOES NOT WARRANT THIS INFORMATION TO BE ACCURATE OR COMPLETE, AS THE CONTRACTOR, IN COOPERATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY OPERATOR, IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE LOCATION, SIZE, AND DEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK. 8. THE RELOCATION AND /OR PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BE COORDINATED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND ANY COSTS FOR SUCH WORK SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR EXTRA TIME AND EFFORT OR PROVISIONS NECESSARY TO WORK AROUND OR UNDER ANY UTILITIES. 9. DIMENSIONS ILLUSTRATED IN TYPICAL SECTIONS REFLECT PREFERRED MINIMUMS AND SHALL NOT BE USED AS THE SOLE BASIS OF BID. REFER TO DRAWINGS AND RESOLVE ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN FIELD AT TIME OF STAKING. 10. COORDINATION WITH OTHER ON -SITE CONTRACTORS IS CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT AND SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AS DESCRIBED IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND CITY STREETS CONTINUOUSLY CLEAN FROM DIRT AND DEBRIS DURING ALL OPERATIONS A DAILY BASIS. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROPERTY AND STREET CLEANING SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL. 12. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF A SURFACE WATER MUST HAVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER FOR THE EXPOSED SOIL AREAS YEAR ROUND. AREAS THAT ARE BEING DISTURBED BUT NOT ACTIVELY BEING WORKED SHALL RECEIVE TEMPORARY SEEDING AND /OR MULCHING WITHIN THREE DAYS. THESE AREAS INCLUDE CONSTRUCTED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT POND SIDE SLOPES AND ANY EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A POSITIVE SLOPE TO A STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM, SUCH AS A CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEM, STORM SEWER INLET, TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR OTHER NATURAL OR MAN -MADE SYSTEMS THAT DISCHARGE TO A SURFACE WATER. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (IE. CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS REQUIREMENT. 13. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT COMPLETE TEMPORARY MULCHING AS SPECIFIED, THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SHALL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR IN WRITING THAT HE HAS 24 HOURS TO COMPLETE THE TEMPORARY MULCHING AND /OR VEGETATION OR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A $500 DEDUCTION PER DAY OF NON - COMPLIANCE. 14. ALL SEEDED AREAS TO HAVE 6" OF TOPSOIL EITHER SALVAGED OR IMPORTED. SUBSOIL SHALL BE IN A LOOSE CONDITION FOR A UNIFORM DEPTH OF AT LEAST 6" PRIOR TO TOPSOIL PLACEMENT (SITE REPRESENTATIVE OR OWNER TO VERIFY),IMPORTED TOPSOIL WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL BY OWNER. 15. INSPECT SILT FENCE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EACH RUNOFF EVENT. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHOULD BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. WHEN SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REACH APPROX. TWO -THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE, REMOVE SEDIMENT OR INSTALL A SECOND ROW OF SILT FENCE AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 16. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE VEHICLE ACCESS TO PUBLIC STREETS WILL BE PERMITTED. REMOVE AT COMPLETION OF PROJECT. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING WITHIN THREE DAYS OF FINAL GRADING OPERATIONS. 18. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS PLAN SET IS FORBIDDING PURPOSES AND VERIFICATION OF CRITICAL LAYOUT DIMENSIONS. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE THE PROJECT LAYOUT TO AVOID UNFORESEEN CONSTRAINTS, SUCH AS MATURE TREES, SOIL CONDITIONS, ETC. CHANGES IN BID QUANTITIES WILL BE BASED ON A PER UNIT BASES FOR UNIT BID ITEMS ON THE BID FORM. 19. ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE FIELD STAKED ACCORDING TO PLAN AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH THE OWNER TO REVIEW STAKES AND MAKE ADJUSTMENTS NECESSARY PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING DONE. MATERIALS LEGEND BITUMINOUS PERMEABLE BITUMINOUS SURFACE GRAVEL OR CRUSHED MATERIAL COBBLE OR RIPRAP OR BOULDERS GROUT METAL - -I PLYWOOD STONE (QUARRIED AND CUT) WOOD CLEAR AND GRUB ALL VEGETATION CLEAR AND GRUB BRUSH PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET + + + PLACE SEED W W W W W PLACE SOD ANNOTATION SYMBOLS LEGEND Al SECTION CUT A000 Al DETAIL CUT A000 Al EXTERIOR ELEVATION A000 C5 CONSTRUCTION KEY NOTE D3 DEMOLITION KEY NOTE BLDG CORNER WORK OR CONTROL POINT ELEV. 940.02 t. # Aglev. SITE SURVEY POINT # TRAVERSE POINT Is D SOIL BORING, TEST PIT QREVISION TAG WITH CLOUD C O a L U U) Ln z a) O ° > w ra ry ° Y L J w Q = • • CONCRETE • a , PERMEABLE CONCRETE SURFACE a- MODULAR BLOCK (MANUFACTURED) 0 PERMEABLE PAVER -TYPE SURFACE EARTH OR EXISTING IN -SITU SOILS SAND OR GRANULAR MATERIAL GRAVEL OR CRUSHED MATERIAL COBBLE OR RIPRAP OR BOULDERS GROUT METAL - -I PLYWOOD STONE (QUARRIED AND CUT) WOOD CLEAR AND GRUB ALL VEGETATION CLEAR AND GRUB BRUSH PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET + + + PLACE SEED W W W W W PLACE SOD ANNOTATION SYMBOLS LEGEND Al SECTION CUT A000 Al DETAIL CUT A000 Al EXTERIOR ELEVATION A000 C5 CONSTRUCTION KEY NOTE D3 DEMOLITION KEY NOTE BLDG CORNER WORK OR CONTROL POINT ELEV. 940.02 t. # Aglev. SITE SURVEY POINT # TRAVERSE POINT Is D SOIL BORING, TEST PIT QREVISION TAG WITH CLOUD C O a L U U) Ln z a) O ° > w ra ry ° Y L J w Q = O Z QJ w O H N d a- zQ 0 �D�w� z �0z0< LU w LU =}z° =a 2io w o LL mUU) Of� O N o w w w ��LU m Uj U o CJ�Z U�� rwcn�w"O p W dU _jZw (If cnw� -� iu Lr) LU < < <WW z o z ro W ru o L L O U O �/. -a I..L O Cj) cl� V .� r_ Q) Z3 _0 U ^� 016 W 0 -0 ry ry Q) 4-J _S�e C ru o J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JCB Drawn By NCS Checked By JCB SHEET TITLE General Notes G001 Sheet 02 of 09 w X zQ 0 L = 00 O N O O Lr) Z �, m , HLn � � E LV (� I\ LL C A d' Ln x a °z oc o a a zw LV Q z z= ~ w � X O O� O� O J M d z ro W ru o L L O U O �/. -a I..L O Cj) cl� V .� r_ Q) Z3 _0 U ^� 016 W 0 -0 ry ry Q) 4-J _S�e C ru o J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JCB Drawn By NCS Checked By JCB SHEET TITLE General Notes G001 Sheet 02 of 09 7 i M N dl O N Ln 0 01 0) 0 U Q) ro L O J Cz a� 0 m 0 Q) L O ry U rn U O J i L F- O 0) Q) ry U) U w r1 ry a r-; N 114 COR SEC. 18, T. 119, R. 23 Hennepin Co. C.I.M. 0 LO 0i M /1 4 Q W 0) C/)Q J z05� 00 Uz w� z= w �? Z Z 6 LO N �I L0 00 O 0 9 N U_ C� 0 LL 00 O WU �� J zz LUz� a ,`4' ro W �zo �Q? 00 0 O r\ o O Z o z m HENNEPI N COUNTY S TA TE AID M HI GHWA Y NO. 10, PLAT 8 M S 89 043'23" W 305.00' 181.25 92.75' 88.50' 1 123.75 CGUN7V RO Oo concrete curb &gutter Highway Easement E N 89043'23" ___/ Q PerDo. No. 8651543 227.59, ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW F � So. RI line f C `J a O., 4- c Q) rz w co LO CEO _Cl) (u o� O � O d' oak's. s 1u o PROPOSED BITUMINOUS m -;,, °o 0 CV) O . •• s : ' " --J\-- PROPOSED CXT 42 1. A& # 123.751 88 50 36.00' - S89 °43'23" N LINE OF THE S 8 RODS N LO LO O O o O 95.66' w w ' " --J\-- PROPOSED CXT 42 1. A& # 123.751 88 50 36.00' - S89 °43'23" N LINE OF THE S 8 RODS N LO LO O O o O 33 33' S 95.66' w w 212.89 (meas) 212.25' (deed) S 89 046'24" W EXISTING SNOWMOBILE TRAIL, TYP. M ro. 10 NORTH LINE OF NW 114 OF— NE 114, SEC. 18, T. 119, R. 23 2319.14 o N 89 04323" E found 1 "iron pipe, up 1' (mo W N OM N O 0) 0) C/) 0 WIWI found I" iron pipe PROPOSED SNOWMOBILE TRAIL C O a L U NE COR OF NE z o SEC. 18, T. 119, 0 — LO Hennepin Co. C. > 0 10 20 40 L w Q�Q Z= �oQ °o z 0 �z�Lu Z2LU =2izCO = 0 >_ m�LL� LL. Lm, - w w w �L z_ C) W �� rw CI) 0�w0 mom }w LU0- JZL11 w Of (nw� —� :E H = Of Q �_ O z Q Z Qw(n f w X z< O a00 O N O Ln O� T � �, Z m , [� W M I\ 0 � L y C d' Ln Q W Q z oc Ai 0. zw LLJ w Q z_ z= w ~ X� o � O J M d Q O L L O U o O V C . � L C Q) Z3 -0 U 66 4� 0_ CY) -0 ro O J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Site Layout C001 Sheet 03 of 09 f w X z< O a00 O N O Ln O� T � �, Z m , [� W M I\ 0 � L y C d' Ln Q W Q z oc Ai 0. zw LLJ w Q z_ z= w ~ X� o � O J M d Q O L L O U o O V C . � L C Q) Z3 -0 U 66 4� 0_ CY) -0 ro O J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Site Layout C001 Sheet 03 of 09 Q O L L O U o O V C . � L C Q) Z3 -0 U 66 4� 0_ CY) -0 ro O J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Site Layout C001 Sheet 03 of 09 7 i M N ai 0 N \ Ln a) y-+ O .1 0) C) U (0 Q) ro L 0 rl J Cz m 0 Q) L 0 U k rn 0 J i L Cz O Q) U) U w r1 ry a r-; C O CL L U U) LI) z a) O V) > w (a r CoOER TIFICA TE OF SURVEY L �- for Three Rivers Park District ¢ w z= �oQ °o 0 U) :iz- _:w Z T_�°°_ LU ° wQ =2,z o =� }m°LL° w 0> w w w ��W °zz LJ CJ <� W �� rwcnif w0 LL mOf � }w wd(_) _j Zw �(nw� —� w :E H = Q �_ O z Q Qw(n Z H,EIVNEPIIV COUNTY S 7A 7E AIQ w x N 114 C ©R SEC. 18, – 1`, HIGHWA Y NO. 10, PLAT 8 � f – – ` � �, � - - NE COR OF NE 114 ;'R SEC. 18, T. 119,+R. 23 z a Oz U_ T 119, R. 1 �j X 1� y, Hennepin Co. C.I.. a Hennepin Co. C.I.M. 1 _ S 89°41323° W 305.00 -- - NORTH LINE OF NW 114 OF - - - -14 + N 1 181.25 - - - NE 114, SEC• 18, T. 119, R. 23 0 Ln 92.75` - -- -I`iw - -- 88.50, - -_ - - -`+! 123.75 -� 2319.14 -__ � Ln Ln DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED ,' �� I � �4a i 1 ��'� g � °° r � _ 1 °1 � i 1° k - GaRGl�fe CUif? �r �Iit ®f +° - � �� 9 N 89°4323" E Z u, M I That part of the Northwest 114 of the Northeast 114 of Section 18, Township 119 North, Range 23 West o + R hway Easement O� k 1 89043'23" s Per Do. No. S65154a _ y i ° t- ° _ X1Q�� I < 227.59' -_x1° ti 3 M °h° x�fl�° ' ___ =� - i�7 _ s - , °`` - F-I IH W l0 M of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: ,beginning at the 114 Section Post between Section I 1a . G _ �..,., X i .� -° T_ T – ��� '�' I c , , ..;� Gs— _ — -� Iaurrdi`irurr X'- f ,pipe, up T V 0 7, and Section 18 in Township 119, Range 23; thence South along 114 Section line 23 rods; thence ,Q1 U° r �� / I +.. t 4r —So. R W line of CSAH No. 10 I 'N C East T rods 13 114 feet; thence North 14 112 rods; thence West 2 rods and 3 feet; thence North 8 112 I �� � � °` ! I ti I ` � � °,. ° '� H Ln Ln rods; thence West 5 112 rods and 2 feet to place of beginning. EXCEPTING therefrom the South 8 rods ~ icy �" 6 ,ro ' ,� I a 1� x� x1l xknti�'6 ^ x € ° Q, Q Z = thereof �' I r �° 6 pt� ��^� I 1 ®tip ° ti" I x I � x` ° Q v� Q, Q O i- CO f I' °° °� �r x 11h> �''° And that part of the Northeast 114 of Section 18; Township 119, Range 23, described as follows: I `�'� w w ��a11 I . w ` y I c w ti ,° e�4 1 p+ w u7 Commencing 92.75 feet East of the Northwest corner of Northeast 114 of Section 18, Township 119, 1 I x _ a — AO� ' Ile W Q z Range 23; thence South S rods; thence East 88.5 feet; thence North 8 rods: thence West 88.5 feet to �► ^,� r; 1 + a cYs' C� I !r7 1 o �, �, ,.� b co ° 60 X-C y x1 x J place of beginning. Subject to road. I x'e o o� 1a'! cZ I a I ! ! I x,e°no 9 W 1 1 10 X 8 45 And all that part of the Northeast 114 of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23, described as follows; I �"' 1° ,. r I k , I e I ° � 1 X w Commencing at a point on the North lime of said 114 Section distant 10 rods and 15 114 feet ,East of the o . wry- 00 I i �' �I � ��4g ,� � ; � ; I x�`� l a10" �° '�• ��'c� X O Northwest corner of said 114 Section; thence South 8 rods; thence East 7 112 rods; thence North 8 rods W, �; � © X1 ° r -�� S1R4 J' 41 I 3 I �' � I , ° A ,� 1 ��. 1 $ °° 1 0 }_ to the Noah line of said 114 Section; thence West along said North line 7 112 rods to the point of I ' {�- "a8.�o'� - - -- -- _1 6 �` 123 "� ' ti $ - -- - "wn - ' °pipe �•f�� ° –' M a beginning, subject to road. g 9i j I e w w�R �_ I :. a' 1 212.89' (meas) ``$ pipe xti ;� I ®I �i `- 3s.vv' *� x,,4 212.25 (deed) 1$�;$ Z Hennepin County, Minnesota t. co R 0� y l O S89 °43'23 "w+ , 1 w � f r o x 11? S 8904624" W 11 ( Per Commitment for Title Insurance, issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, dated March 11, x .�. n �x I ro 2 £114. I A� 01 ° I DG 1 ' z« b s 11 ,• �� O a I x��,° (a L III I v,v t I 1 Q CO y V p IJ X 1d co ■ � r0 AREAS: + I r =.,,N LII'+1,E OF `� 1 TH4 5 8 RODS I ', I ; , t "1 ` Total Area: 54,877 s. f. +/- 33 �` I ;" 95.66' A 1 33i �1 + S 89Q3�'.1 " rIr 4i °a°� o� �- yy co ` ���n��II 18,162 f. f ►I/VV. S.ff Roads _ .. _ . i' - _ _ - o p X1l, j �- y . - °� 128.75' I I 1 1q1 ! fRfl 11'- ' —chain q O U Net: 36,715 S.f +7- I uthonca Ir pmper#y fins "S' k I :x I 16CL . x " x �� ? I X 1°^ "� ` x � 30' 60' Q) 83 33 °� GARAGE 59E tlr,ti ©g CIL I I BENCHMARK: I I I _0 o ,, Control Point No. 1 I ° a N I F ' in southeast quadrant County co CO� o •- �., Road 19 & County Road 10. I Elev. = 10111.40 (NA VD88) I I (� O I I I J U LEGEND I I I I Proj. No. TLI 1401 I Issue Date 5/14/2014 Hennepin County I ' ; Cast Iron Monument I ' , r' 33 I — — — —' Designed By JB I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or v Set 1/2" x 14" iron pipe 128.75' P- Drawn By NS under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed N 89 04323" Checked By JB Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State • Found Iron Monument of Minnesota. Spot Elevation Evergreen Tree ftEMIER SHEET EX CONDITIONS TITLE 22703 04101114 Deciduous Tree DEl11C�7ES BITUMINOUS PATH REVISED. 04116114 -ADDED CONTOURS SURVEYING, LAND SURVEY Steven V. lsche License No Date SAND LL(-_ Control Point REVISED: 04115114 - ADDED TOPOGRAPHY 952- 443 -3010 Traverse PC V 101 Sheet 04 of 09 7 i M N ai 0 N Ln a) 0 01 /O(UG)----- F /O(UG) - -F a Q O 0) 0 Q) ro L 0 J Cz p1 m 0 N L L 0 ry U rn U 0 J L O 0) Q) ry U) U ry a r-; / I JV LL_ LL LL Co U H7V G30O INSTALL INLET PROTECTION PER DETAIL ERO -17 REMOVE 46 LF B624 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - - - -- UG — C— / 0( U— — F/ 0( UG�F /0(UG�� /0(UG)-- F /0(UG)- -/0( UGC— F/ 0(UG— F /0(UG— F /0(UG }— /0(UG� —/MUG F, UG}— F /0(UG)- -/ 0( UG) —F/ O( UG) — / O(UG)-- F /O(UG) — /O(UG)— /O(UG �/O(UG)- 0( ——/0( UG �/0(UG) /0(UG)— F /0(UG) /0(UG O: Qy — (oy I�VG ROW ROW ROU�p� { /OaG R F/0 G)�F /O(UG} -R-O /0(UG) --f /MUG) F /0(UG� - F /0(UG)F /0(UG� —F /0 �-- F/ 0(UG)�F /0(UG)�- F /0(UG)- �F /GNG }_ O \ II O PC I \ I �o� I 9k I - x\ A �X/\ \ 0 +50 _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L 316 LF SILT FENCE SEE DETAIL ERO -8 SALVAGE AND'STOCKPILE 6" TOPSOIL AT LOCATION �HOWN ON PLAN 187 CY TOTAL ' L z W W Z 0 w X / z< O ._ r 00 O U o O N o O o � C rnLr) Q) Z ern , U Ln ^� H � [� LU M I\ _0 fo LL y 3 I Q d- J 0 Lr) TLI 1401 ~ oe: zz O LL a zw NS w Qz LL 3 I 0 z= ~ w � I X LL I O 3 M d I 0 I LL I E3 )(UG) ---F /MUG)--- f/ O( UG)- --F /0(UG)-- -- F /O(UG) --- F /O(UG) F /O(UG)--- F /O(UG)- F /0(UG) / MUG) F /O(UG) F /O(UG)- -F /O(UG) ----F /MUGS ---F /MUG) —F /MUG)- ---F /O(UG)�- -ROW -------- - - - - -- — (OH)' E(OH�(OH) E(OHR� f� —E OH �r/ I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. REMOVE AND GRUB TREE, TYP. r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 x X x x K CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE xx SEE DETAIL ERO -1 1 L 1 a —%�' 1 1 / \ . \1 1 I I 1 'F /aU0 i / I � I I I it /\XX x 1\ 1 �1 ------ - - - - -- STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AT THIS LOCATION IN FORM OF A BERM. BERM SHALL BE ROUGHLY 2 -3' IN HEIGHT. CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE TOPSOIL IN DISTURBED AREAS, ON SITE FOR FILL IN NON -PAVED AREAS, AND LEAVE REMAINING. PROVIDE SWALE BETWEEN BERM AND PARKING LOT - DISCHARGING TO THE SOUTH. N 0 5 10 20 C O CL L U U) LI) z a) O V) > w (a ry 0 Y L Q W Q,5Z� U)��w� T_o�0Q a. _ 2i LLJ z W W Q O = 0 }m°��° LLO- W W W �ofWL °z CJ0-Z W �LL LL r W CO Of W O W 0- J Z Lit Z Q 0 Z Q _ O Q W U) f O z W SHEET TITLE Removals Erosion Control C201 Sheet 05 of 09 z W W Z 0 w X Q z< O ._ r 00 O U o O N o O o � C rnLr) Q) Z ern , U Ln ^� H � [� LU M I\ _0 fo LL y C Q d- J W Lr) TLI 1401 ~ oe: zz O a a zw NS w Qz z= ~ w � X 00 J O M d SHEET TITLE Removals Erosion Control C201 Sheet 05 of 09 z Q O ._ L O U o o V C .� c Q) Z3 -0 U 66 ^� ^W ^0_ W i--I _0 fo H� W a-J o J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Removals Erosion Control C201 Sheet 05 of 09 7 i M N ai O N O Ln 0 .1 0) ru L O J _ m 0 L O U rn U O d- J ro L ro _ O ry U) U w ry a r-; 2' WIDTH AT MAX. 2% SLOPE ON SHOULDER. 3:1 MAXIMUM SLOPE (H:V) OUTSIDE OF 2' SHOULDER. PREFERRED 3' CLEARANCE, 2' MIN. FROM TREES OR OTHER OBSTRUCTION. SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR TRAIL STRIPING. MAX. CROSS SLOPE 2%. SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR SLOPE DIRECTION. MIN. 3' CLEARANCE BETWEEN EDGE OF TRAIL AND EDGE OF SIGN. MAINTAIN 10' VERTICAL CLEAR ZONE ABOVE TRAIL. TRIM TREE BRANCHES ACCORDINGLY. JLIL I L/11 V JI ILL IJ /-\I V LJ JI L\—,II I `JI\ JLLLJII V V r-\I VLJ 3" TYPE SPWEA240B BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 6" CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE 12" SCARIFY, DRY, AND RECOMPACT SUBGRADE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY OWNER. NOTES: 1. BITUMINOUS SHALL BE PLACED IN ONE LIFT. 2. CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TO MnDOT SPEC 3138. 3. SUBGRADE SHALL BE TEST ROLLED PRIOR TO AGGREGATE BASE INSTALLATION AND CONFORM TO MnDOT SPEC 21 1 1. TYPICAL TRAIL SECTION 8' OFF -ROAD NTS CL5 AGGREGATE BASE, 12" COMPACTED THICKNESS, MIN. SEED MnDOT MIX 25 -141 @ 60 LB /AC, TYP. RESTORE SHOULDER AREA WITH TOPSOIL, CONFORMIN TO MnDOT SPEC 3877. 6" THICKNESS, MIN. (MINIMIZE COMPACTION). ?" SCARIFY, DRY, AND ECOMPACT SUBGRADE 1ATERIAL AS DIRECTED Y OWNER. sTR -1s� TYPICAL AGGREGATE PARKING SECTION EXTEND BASE 12 ", MIN. TYPE SPWEB240B WEAR COURSE, 2" COMPACTED THICKNESS, MIN. TYPE SPNWB230B BASE COURSE, 2" COMPACTED THICKNESS, MIN. CL5 AGGREGATE BASE, 6" COMPACTED THICKNESS, MIN. a NTS \t 1� hl�� /� 1� i , SEED MnDOT MIX 25 -141 @ 60 LB /AC, TYP. RESTORE SHOULDER AREA WITH TOPSOIL, CONFORMIN TO MnDOT SPEC 3877. 6" THICKNESS, MIN. (MINIMIZE COMPACTION). COMPACT EXISTING SUBGRADE. sTR -3\ TYPICAL RURAL BITUMINOUS ROAD SECTION NTS C O 0. L U U) Ln z a) O > ryo Y L VIM E IVY� 1v R E! �a z ca Q ru 0 U L L O U ■ O .-0 oc o a� V .� C c Q) Z3 —0 U 66 4� 0- CY) (1) -0 ro 4� o J U w zQ OU- r 00 0- t O N O Ln Or� T z m� � Ln W 0 � L o W Lr) oc z a zw w Qz O z= w ~ X � O O� O O J M d Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Typical Sections C301 Sheet 06 of 09 Q�Q z= 'W 1 0 D ��w3 z �0z0< LU _ z w Q o =� 0 }m°LL° w o w w w WOfW�°zz 0 W rwcnOf ww0 mOf � }w LLJdU JZL11 fl�(nw:) —� w LU f- = Q (Y O z Q <LU0 Z VIM E IVY� 1v R E! �a z ca Q ru 0 U L L O U ■ O .-0 oc o a� V .� C c Q) Z3 —0 U 66 4� 0- CY) (1) -0 ro 4� o J U w zQ OU- r 00 0- t O N O Ln Or� T z m� � Ln W 0 � L o W Lr) oc z a zw w Qz O z= w ~ X � O O� O O J M d Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Typical Sections C301 Sheet 06 of 09 G Q M N ai O N \ O ,--I Ln a) O 0) 0 m a� ru L rl O J _ O r) CO i m Q) L O U rn U O d- H J i L ra _ O_ O Q) ry Cn U w r, a 1010 1005 -20 O C14 (Y) C� 00 Q W (n 0 O n O '� IE:5 �° LL oLU W LO w Q QI Q W (n 0 LL LL ow W Cl) v w X CENTERL ELEV: 1 NE ELEV. 09.856 zQ 1015 101 —10 l9 1 +00 10 1010 1005 20 1005 -20 1015 1010 -20 —10 0 +50 10 1015 1010 1005 20 0 LO w Q QI Q W (n 0 Ol Z 0 Cl) v w X � O O zQ N O — O OU- o w LL = 00 W w a � LL oW ow O N 0 1.00% -1.00% O Ln 0 ELEV: 1 11.905 O Ln 0 -- CENTERL NE ELEV. 10.235 ELEV: 1 10.482 Ln Ln E LV (, I\ 1005 -20 1015 1010 -20 —10 0 +50 10 1015 1010 1005 20 1015 1010 -20 -10 tLtV: I U I 1 AY6 0 o +oo 10 1015 1010 20 0 LO w Q QI Q W (n 0 Ol Z 0 O 't � Ln O w X O ° r CY) o zQ L:> LL OU- o w LL = 00 0 1.00% -1.00% O w a � L_ W oLU LL W ow O N CENTERL NE ELEV. O Ln 1015 1010 -20 -10 tLtV: I U I 1 AY6 0 o +oo 10 1015 1010 20 -10 10 1015 1010 20 1010 1005 -20 N N O Lr) O 00 1015 101 —10 C 1 +25 10 1010 1005 20 r" LO w Q QI Q W (n C Ol Z 0 �^ 't � Ln O w X O 6— 6� zQ L:> LL OU- LL W OW ,>„ LL J OW = 00 0 1.00 -1 1 a � L_ W oLU LL W ow O N CENTERL NE ELEV. O Ln 0 ELEV: 1 11.905 O Ln -10 10 1015 1010 20 1010 1005 -20 N N O Lr) O 00 1015 101 —10 C 1 +25 10 1010 1005 20 1005 -20 1015 1010 -20 -10 D 0 +75 10 1015 1010 1005 20 CO w Q QI Q W (n N Ol Z 0 CR N w X O O O zQ N C) � O OU- L LL W 6 = 00 LL > LL > a � L_ W oLU LL W ow O N _ 6. . 1.00% _ -1 O Ln 0 O Ln CENTERL NE ELEV. CENTERL ELEV: 1 10.235 ELEV: 1 1 1.867 Ln Ln 1005 -20 1015 1010 -20 -10 D 0 +75 10 1015 1010 1005 20 1015 1010 -20 -10 CENTERLINE ELEV. ELEV: 1810.940 0 +25 10 1015 1010 20 CO w Q QI Q W (n � N Z 0 CR cl� w X Ln o O zQ (D Ol No OU- L LL W 6 = 00 0 > LL W a � — � LL O W O N OW - .00% -6 O Ln 1015 1010 -20 -10 CENTERLINE ELEV. ELEV: 1810.940 0 +25 10 1015 1010 20 -10 10 1015 1010 20 C O L U () LI) z a) O V) > w ra r Y L (6 ��Qw z= Q�Q 0-0Q °o �zl=wCQ �O 0 O Q =2,wQ o =� �mU)��U) w 05; w w w LJ CJ <� W D� rwcnOf w0 mom }w O z c� w w d U_j Z W =Q>�OZQ CO w Q QI Q W (n � Z 0 CR cl� w X zQ (D 10 0 OU- 6— 6� = 00 w U_w a � U_ O N OW OW O Ln O Ln M Ln CENTERL NE ELEV. i Ln ELEV: 1 1 1.867 Ln Ln -10 10 1015 1010 20 C O L U () LI) z a) O V) > w ra r Y L (6 ��Qw z= Q�Q 0-0Q °o �zl=wCQ �O 0 O Q =2,wQ o =� �mU)��U) w 05; w w w LJ CJ <� W D� rwcnOf w0 mom }w O z c� w w d U_j Z W =Q>�OZQ w Q QI Q W (n Z 0 w X zQ OU- = 00 a � O N O Ln O Ln M Ln Z i Ln Ln Ln E LV (, I\ U. d Ln LU Ln Q a ~ zo O a zw w O Qz z= ~ W X � O O� O O J M d z ca Q ro O U L L O U O 0 U V C .� C Z3 W -0 U 66 ^� W fo O J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Cross Sections C701 Sheet 08 of 09 12' -3" 9 FRONT ELEVATION NCH ❑R NAIL 1/4 x 3/4 REDRILL 1/4" TYP 12 PLCS) GN (SI -2) YMB ❑L AS REQUIRED) 5" 4' -4 14' -7 1/2" REAR ELEVATION I I II II LEFT SIDE ELEVATION BUILDING -TO -VAULT CONNECTION: BUTYL TAPE ADHESIVE SEALANT - SEE ATTACHED CUT SHEET, VAULT 2 (SEE DWG #V2 -1) EMBEDDED MATERIALS ITEM OTY ITEM SI -2 2 VENT PIPE 12' -0" 1 ANCHOR NAIL 1 /4x3/4 12 CU. FT. CONC. I SO. FT. W.W.F. I APPROXIMATE WEIGHT C01W Precast Products PROJECT TITLE GUNN ISO N RIGHT HAND CXT STANDARD BUILDING NOTICE The information contained herein is proprietary and the exclusive property of CXT Incorporated. The information may only be used by the original recipient for the purpose intended. Reproduction or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of CXT Incorporated. By allowing use of this information, CXT Incorporated grants no warranty, express or implied, including a warranty of merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. CXT Incorporated DRAWN I I FILE N0. I PD -1302 CHECKED I I PLOT 1 48 BUILDING ELEVATIONS DWG NO. G -02 SHEET /I REV. 12' -3" 4 "- ' 4' it SECTION CXT I,D TAG CENTER ON INTERIOR DOOR FRAME B BLIND RIVET 1/8x1/4 (QTY 2) COAT H❑ ❑K ONE WAY OVAL 8x1 1/4 3068 DOOR ANCHOR LEAD 6 -8x1 SEE MI FOR SPECIFICATION PREDRILL 1/4" DOOR STOP PREDRILL 1/4" SIGN SI -2 (SYMBOL AS REG) ANCH ❑R NAIL 1/4x3/4 (QTY 6) PREDRILL 1/4" � 1B 402 5" 35 SECTION C - C TP DISPENSER (SE MI F❑R SPECIFICATI ❑N) ANCHOR NAIL 1/4x1 (QTY PREDRILL 1/4" ISER C A IF I �IIII�III I I I I SECTDON B - B SECTDON D - D SPRING HINGE 4,5x4,5 (TYP 3 PLCS) J (SI -1) d ❑R NAIL 1/4x3/4 (QTY 4) DRILL 1/4" GRAB BAR ANCH ❑R NAIL 3/16x7/8 (QTY 9 PREDRILL HOLE 3/16" DIA EMBEDDED MATERIALS ITEM OTY ITEM OTY RISER 1 ONE WAY OVAL 8x1 1/4 2 GRAB BAR 1 ANCHOR LEAD 6 -8x1 2 TP DISPENSER 1 BLIND RIVET 1/8x1/4 2 TOILET PAPER ROLL 2 -3 3068 DOOR ASSEMBLY 1 COAT HOOK 1 SPRING HINGE 4.50.5 3 DOOR STOP 1 SI -1 1 SI -2 1 CXT I.D. TAG 1 ANCHOR NAIL 1 /41 6 ANCHOR NAIL 1/4x3/4 10 ANCHOR NAIL 3/16x7/8 9 CU. FT. CONC. I SO. FT. W.W.F. I APPROXIMATE WEIGHT CXT Precast Products PROJECT TITLE GUNNISON RIGHT HAND CXT STANDARD BUILDING NOTICE The information contained herein is proprietary and the exclusive property of CXT Incorporated. The information may only be used by the original recipient for the purpose intended. Reproduction or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of CXT Incorporated. By allowing use of this information, CXT Incorporated grants no warranty, express or implied, including a warranty of merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. CXT Incorporated SCALE 1/4 " =1' -0" DATE 03 -28 -05 DRAWN FILE NO. PD —G03 CHECKED PLOT 48 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DWG N0. SHIE� REV. G -03 15' -1 3/4° lo ol 14' -7 1/2" 100, 2 12' -3 112" ol ❑PTI❑NAL URINAL 7'-3 1/2" 5' M❑UNT RIM 17" OFF FINISHED FLOER—\ (SEE MI) 4" 4" 4" 1' 4" W 1 I 1' -2" I r � I I I XXXXXXXXX 60" DIA TURNING CIRI LE XXX XXXXXX I I 8'— 6" 6/-6// 5' -10" XXXXXXXXX z r XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX J XXXXXXXXX / L� X X X X X X X X � X XXXXXXX X XXXXXXX � � Y CAT 3' -6" XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX 4,_5' Precast Products XXXXXXXXX I XXXXXXXXX � XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX \ _ _ f PROJECT TITLE � - M GUNNISON RIGHT HAND 3: CXT STANDARD BUILDING W 2 NOTICE q N F 1 The information contained herein is proprietary and the 1 exclusive property of CXT Incorporated. The information L — — — — — — may only be used by the original recipient for the purpose intended. Reproduction or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of CXT Incorporated. By allowing use of this information, 1, CXT Incorporated grants no warranty, express or implied, ❑ P T I❑ N A L WASTE PAPER B A S i� E T including a warranty of merchantability or of fitness for a M❑UNT BTM 12" ❑FF FINISHED FL❑ ❑R particular purpose. 2/-4' CXT Incorporated (SEE MI) oe 4' -6 1/2" REV. I DESCRIPTION I APPROVAL I DATE SCALE 1/2 " =1' -0" DATE 03 -28 -05 DRAWN FILE NO. PD —G04 CHECKED IPLOT 124 FLOOR PLAN DWG NO. SHEET REV. G -04 rn O O N N 0 �1 0) vi x LU a� ru 0 O J c Cs a� r) m / ro L H O tY U rn tY O It J T fu fo C 0 0) W t� U LU ry a / r, /O(UG) F /O(UG) - -F j Q " O 1012 / I JG LL /BUG` - F /0(U4 f /O(UG). F /O(UG)- F /O(UG )-- F /O(UG)-- --F /0( UG) F /O(UG) /0(UG}'- 'F /O(UG) - F /0(UG} -f JG� ROW ROW nnn!!!UG RO9 /O(UG) /O(UG) F /O(UG) /O(UG�f /O(UG�F /0 /O(UG)-F /O(UO /0(UG}- -� /�-• �F I o� COUNTY M 10 BACK OF CURB HAZEL 8 TOTAL 3 GALLON I - F /O(UG /0( UGC- F /O(UG)---- F /O(UG}- /O(UG) F /O(UG) - F /O(UGl - -F /0 G}- F /0(UG�F /0(UG)--- F /0(UG Gl-- NANNYBERRY /r 5 TOTAL 3 GALLON roy, F /0(UG�- F /0(UG }F /0(UG�F /0(UG }- ' R E(0rtr- ROWGHY=- -E(0Nr fZOW(�r-- {(o"> —ROV � I PROPOSED 10' WIDE SNOWMOBILE TRAIL I 2 1/2" WHITE OAK I � � 1 i- -•� - -- 7C— — O — — / +00 1 +50 0 +50 INSTALL 24 "x24" STEEL "TRPD TRAILHEAD PARKING LOT" SIGN. SIGN PANEL PROVIDED BY OWNER /O(UG) - -f, CAUTION BURIED FIBER -OPTIC • FURNISH AND INSTALL CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER PER STR -2, C801 REPLACE FRAME \AND GRATE WITH NEENAH R-336 0-A /O(UG )--F fiL�3il�a /O(UG) F /O(UG) F 1011. • Coll 1 • • m pw N 1 1 1010.95 i 7 r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i 1 1010.14 1010.80 I 1 1 - F /O(UG)- f /O(UG)- F /O(UG) F /O(UG / 0 L 00 O, PVI ELEV: 1011.94 CL rco G STOP - .L `n (n O AD: -2.34% - -- - - - -- _- z aj O o � 2i W ! - - - -- R1 -1 - - 30X30 - - - 0(UG (n Qj j W � o -F/000 F /O(UG F /O(UG)--- F /O(UG OHS -E OH (OH R /0(ljGo•56 ( 0 a O O + o c'j�W� 6 O o + LL - F /O(UG)- f /O(UG)- F /O(UG) F /O(UG / 0(UG L 00 O, PVI ELEV: 1011.94 O rco G K: 17.23 CT ° O AD: -2.34% ° I. N ° � 2i W ! 101 0(UG z a z -F/000 F /O(UG F /O(UG)--- F /O(UG OHS -E OH (OH R /0(ljGo•56 ( 0 a O O + o c'j�W� 6 O o + LL I + vi w N w �Dza°'J >>>> 1010.96 00 2 z a- _ }pWF -0 Li 1 �oocn of cn I m no m ~ W � 'u-) z zz N W n 1 1 0Z 0 a w z .- ! 1 }WUJ�WO 00 � H } W 1 w 0- v J z w =Q��zl¢- _�o¢WU) r 1009.63 --/ - - - - - - - -_ - -- — CNSTLIMITS 1009.52- - — � - - — — — — — — — _— — PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR, TYP. ' 1009.47— PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR/, TYP. r 1 / 1009 59� 009.72 0 i,b o i I 10 009.97 1 � 1 9' 1 � 1 \ I 00 1009.55 d • d �U ° ° A , d A a FFE +1009.62 d ° ° d _ 1009. rn ` t n 9 7< // PVI STA: 0 +94.85 PVI STA: 1+22.05 PVI ELEV: 1010.50 PVI ELEV: 1010.30 K: 19.18 K: 30.74 AD: 1.49% AD: -0.84% —VC: 28.529 — VC: 25.867— a N PVI STA: 0+30.11 0, 00 O, PVI ELEV: 1011.94 O rco K: 17.23 CT ° O AD: -2.34% ° I. N ° VC: 40.309 O 01 M HIGH PT. STA: 0 +1 1.91 N o + o HIGH PT ELEV: 1011.92 6 O o + + vi w N w vi >>>> di 00 00 Li 0 00 >> m no m w W n 1 1 0Z 009.72 0 i,b o i I 10 009.97 1 � 1 9' 1 � 1 \ I 00 1009.55 d • d �U ° ° A , d A a FFE +1009.62 d ° ° d _ 1009. rn ` t n 9 7< // PVI STA: 0 +94.85 PVI STA: 1+22.05 PVI ELEV: 1010.50 PVI ELEV: 1010.30 K: 19.18 K: 30.74 AD: 1.49% AD: -0.84% —VC: 28.529 — VC: 25.867— a N r 0, 00 O, Lq O rco 0.0 CT ° O D` ° I. N ° CO O M GRADE BREAK STA = 1 +61.15 + o + o + o O vi w N w vi w 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 >> >> >> I uug.57 • • - - L - 177 t 71 1 _ 1 - \ II Q II 1 \ �- m n CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL TR -5, INSET 'A' 0 +00 1 +00 FOP VIOLATION R7 -8M 12 X-rS- HAZEL 5 TOTAL 3 GALLON CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORATION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS. AT A MINIMUM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL: 1.1. RESPREAD SALVAGED TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DEBRIS FREE AND PULVERIZED TO A DEPTH OF 6 ". 1.2. RESTORE DISTURBED VEGETATED AREA WITH: • "TRPD SEED MIX" @175 LBS /AC (SEE SPECS) • MnDOT TYPE 2 (22 -0 -10) FERTILIZER @ 350 LBS /AC • CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, ALL NATURAL STITCHING ONLY. RESTORATION SHALL BE PAID BY UNIT PRICES, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS USED. L, 1 I I 1 I � - - - - - - - - - - - - - -p • NANNYBERRY 7 TOTA L 3 GALLON ,ply UTILITY NOTE: THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THE PLAN IS UTILITY LEVEL QUALITY 11D ", UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI /ASCE 38 -02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY! THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT DOES NOT WARRANT THIS INFORMATION TO BE ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR IN r RN 1 N G COOPERATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANY IS OR SHALL CALL GOPHER RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE LOCATION CALL BEFORE DIGGING. AND DEPTH OF ALL UNDERGROUND 1 -800 -252 -1 166 UTILITIES. REQUIRED BY LAW N 0 5 10 20 0 z U W W w z 0 LU x z< O a 00 O N O Ln O � CT L j Z 4r wLn "D [� n LU M C � LL F 0 A Z Ln LU Ln g oQ ~ Oz O W Q LU w z LU Q Z z= LU ~ Z) O 2: O J M L1 � z L O •� L L O U O -0 O � oC V .� 0 -0 U 06 -0 (a H � Q� a-J fu 0 J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Construction Plan C601 Sheet 07 of 09 O 0 m GRADE BREAK STA = 0 +00.00 01 01 -0-14% ELEV = 101 1.905 LO 7 N 10 V7 CT cl� CT Op 7 D` p. I. N 011 N . Oq r GRADE BREAK STA = 1 +61.15 1 008 O O ELEV = 1009.680 0 +00 1 +00 FOP VIOLATION R7 -8M 12 X-rS- HAZEL 5 TOTAL 3 GALLON CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORATION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS. AT A MINIMUM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL: 1.1. RESPREAD SALVAGED TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DEBRIS FREE AND PULVERIZED TO A DEPTH OF 6 ". 1.2. RESTORE DISTURBED VEGETATED AREA WITH: • "TRPD SEED MIX" @175 LBS /AC (SEE SPECS) • MnDOT TYPE 2 (22 -0 -10) FERTILIZER @ 350 LBS /AC • CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, ALL NATURAL STITCHING ONLY. RESTORATION SHALL BE PAID BY UNIT PRICES, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS USED. L, 1 I I 1 I � - - - - - - - - - - - - - -p • NANNYBERRY 7 TOTA L 3 GALLON ,ply UTILITY NOTE: THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THE PLAN IS UTILITY LEVEL QUALITY 11D ", UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI /ASCE 38 -02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY! THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT DOES NOT WARRANT THIS INFORMATION TO BE ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR IN r RN 1 N G COOPERATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANY IS OR SHALL CALL GOPHER RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE LOCATION CALL BEFORE DIGGING. AND DEPTH OF ALL UNDERGROUND 1 -800 -252 -1 166 UTILITIES. REQUIRED BY LAW N 0 5 10 20 0 z U W W w z 0 LU x z< O a 00 O N O Ln O � CT L j Z 4r wLn "D [� n LU M C � LL F 0 A Z Ln LU Ln g oQ ~ Oz O W Q LU w z LU Q Z z= LU ~ Z) O 2: O J M L1 � z L O •� L L O U O -0 O � oC V .� 0 -0 U 06 -0 (a H � Q� a-J fu 0 J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Construction Plan C601 Sheet 07 of 09 O 0 m 10 f11 01 01 CD `t CN LO 7 N 10 V7 CT cl� CT Op 7 D` p. I. N 011 N . Oq r O O O D O O 00 0 00 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 +00 1 +00 FOP VIOLATION R7 -8M 12 X-rS- HAZEL 5 TOTAL 3 GALLON CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORATION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS. AT A MINIMUM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL: 1.1. RESPREAD SALVAGED TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DEBRIS FREE AND PULVERIZED TO A DEPTH OF 6 ". 1.2. RESTORE DISTURBED VEGETATED AREA WITH: • "TRPD SEED MIX" @175 LBS /AC (SEE SPECS) • MnDOT TYPE 2 (22 -0 -10) FERTILIZER @ 350 LBS /AC • CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, ALL NATURAL STITCHING ONLY. RESTORATION SHALL BE PAID BY UNIT PRICES, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS USED. L, 1 I I 1 I � - - - - - - - - - - - - - -p • NANNYBERRY 7 TOTA L 3 GALLON ,ply UTILITY NOTE: THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THE PLAN IS UTILITY LEVEL QUALITY 11D ", UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI /ASCE 38 -02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY! THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT DOES NOT WARRANT THIS INFORMATION TO BE ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR IN r RN 1 N G COOPERATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANY IS OR SHALL CALL GOPHER RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE LOCATION CALL BEFORE DIGGING. AND DEPTH OF ALL UNDERGROUND 1 -800 -252 -1 166 UTILITIES. REQUIRED BY LAW N 0 5 10 20 0 z U W W w z 0 LU x z< O a 00 O N O Ln O � CT L j Z 4r wLn "D [� n LU M C � LL F 0 A Z Ln LU Ln g oQ ~ Oz O W Q LU w z LU Q Z z= LU ~ Z) O 2: O J M L1 � z L O •� L L O U O -0 O � oC V .� 0 -0 U 06 -0 (a H � Q� a-J fu 0 J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Construction Plan C601 Sheet 07 of 09 ►7 r.1 O Nt O N N O O u O L4 X W N O ro C ro L O Nt J i C O N 0 m i co N ro L O U O ry U O J i ca C O 0) N M i U) f- U W rn 0 a r, 6' MIN. a � LU LU N z i _ 4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (NO REBAR) 6" CRUSHED CLASS 5 6" MIN. u° m p D LU W O N z _ 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (NO REBAR) 8" CRUSHED CLASS 5 EXISTING TURF USES: 1. CONCRETE WALK, PICNIC SLAB, PARK BENCH SLAB OR ACCESS TO COMMON OPEN SPACE. 2. LOCATION ANTICIPATED TO RECEIVE INFREQUENT USE BY LIGHT MACHINERY AND /OR LIGHT VEHICLES. EXISTING TURF USES: 1. PRIVATE DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS, PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AND DRINKING FOUNTAIN SLAB. 2. MODERATE USE BY LIGHT MACHINERY AND /OR LIGHT VEHCILES. FACE POST NOTCHES AWAY FROM FABRIC. EXISTING TURF CTION DIRE OF RUNOFF \y\ �&g �y�� _ - - -- 12" MIN. NO V ° USES: ° U COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS OR SUPPORT POST WITH IN -SITU SOIL, u COMPACT ALL DISTURBED OR MAINTENANCE YARDS. V) LOOSE SOIL TO PROVIDE STABILITY. - 2. ANTICIPATED TO RECEIVE FREQUENT USE BY LIGHT MACHINERY AND /OR VEHICLES. 1 3. ANTICIPATED TO RECEIVE INFREQUENT USE BY HEAVY MACHINERY AND /OR HEAVY VEHICLES. L 8" CONCRETE PAVEMENT L(REBAR REQUIRED) 12" CRUSHED CLASS 5 REBAR OR WELDED WIRE MESH NOTES: (SEE NOTE 5). 1. AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TO MnDOT SPEC 2211. 2. CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO MnDOT SPECS 2521 AND 2531. 3. CONCRETE SHALL BE FIBER - REINFORCED WHERE SPECIFIED OR INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ADD DISPERSIBLE, ALKALI - RESISTANT FIBERS AT A RATE OF 1.0 LB/ CY TO CONCRETE MIX OR PER FIBER SUPPLIERS RECOMMENDATIONS. AT LOCATIONS WHERE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC IS EXPECTED, OPEN SLAB SURFACES SHALL BE STRUCK OFF W/ VIBRATING SCREED OR EQUAL, SUCH THAT FIBERS ARE NOT EXPOSED TO THE SURFACE. 4. ANY LOCATION ANTICIPATED TO RECEIVE MODERATE USE BY HEAVY MACHINERY AND /OR HEAVY VEHICLES IS TO BE DESIGNED SEPARATELY AND SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 5. REBAR OR WELDED WIRE MESH IS TO BE PLACED 4" ABOVE BOTTOM OF CONCRETE AND 3" FROM EDGE OF CONCRETE, (SEE PLANS) FOR REBAR OR WELDED WIRE MESH INFORMATION. 6. SEE PLANS FOR ACTUAL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF CONCRETE PAVEMENTS. TR -5 CONCRETE PAVEMENT (TRAIL PURPOSES) a ml NTS IN -PLACE ELEVATION VIEW ISOMETRIC VIEW NOTE: 1. WIMCO ROAD DRAIN RD 23 HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION TOP SLAB MODEL OR APPROVED EQUAL. INLET PROTECTION - BEFORE CURB NTS )PENINGS FOR OVERFLOW LTER ASSEMBLY RD 23 IGH FLOW FILTER FABRIC 1ANHOLE COVER ASSEMBLY AANHOLE STRUCTURE POLYESTER SLEEVE FILTER ASSEMBLY RD 23 MANHOLE COVER ASSEMBLY STEEL FENCE POST, 5' MIN. POST LENGTH, 6' MAX. SPACING BETWEEN POSTS. PLASTIC ZIP TIES 30" HIGH MIN. MS, HI WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, AS PER MnDOT SPEC TABLE 3886 -1. FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH, BACKFILL TRENCH WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOIL. z w .:E _z0 �m CN N w V) N O 0- NOTES: 1. CONFORM TO MnDOT SPECS 2573 AND 3886. 2. ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS WITH PLASTIC ZIP TIES (50 POUND TENSILE STRENGTH, MIN). PROVIDE A MIN. (3) TIES WITHIN THE TOP 8" OF FABRIC. 3. OVERLAP GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 6 ", MIN. AND FASTEN AT 2' INTERVALS, MAX. ERO -1 MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE NTS NOTES: 1. CONFORM TO MnDOT SPEC 2564. 2. POST MATERIAL: 2.1. FIBERGLASS FILAMENT REINFORCED RECYCLED PLASTIC LUMBER POSTS. 2.2. POST LENGTH SHALL BE 13, TYP. OR LONGER, AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STANDARD SIGN MOUNTING HEIGHT. 2.3. NO SPLICES ALLOWED. 2.4. APPROVED PRODUCT: FIBERFORCE ® PLASTIC LUMBER, AS MANUFACTURED BY BEDFORD TECHNOLOGY ® LLC OR APPROVED EQUAL AND MEETING THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: 2.4.1. DIMENSIONAL 4X4 (ACTUAL DIMENSIONS 3.5 "X3.5 "). 2.4.2. COLOR BROWN. 3. SIGN PANEL MATERIAL: 3.1. CONFORM TO MnDOT SPEC 2564 AND 3352. 3.2. REFLECTIVE SHEETING SHALL MEET MnDOT SPEC 3352.2A2 SIGN SHEETING TYPE III. 4. SIGN MOUNTING HARDWARE: 4.1. CARRAIGE BOLTS SHALL BE %6'SIZE, 5" IN LENGTH A304 STAINLESS STEEL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT SPEC 3391.2E. 4.2. LAG SCREWS SHALL BE %6' IN SIZE, 2" IN LENGTH A304 STAINLESS STEEL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT SPEC 3391.2E. 4.3. PROVIDE NYLON WASHER BETWEEN BOLT HEAD AND SIGN PANEL. 4.4. FASTEN BOLTS WITH NYLON INSERT LOCK NUTS OF THE SAME GRADE AND MATERIAL AS THE BOLTS. 5. AUGER POST HOLES AND SET POSTS SUCH THAT SIGN FACE IS PERPENDICULAR TO ROADWAY OR PARALLEL TO PARKING LOT. 6. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS AND SIGN LAYOUTS FOR ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS AND DEVICES FOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO FABRICATION. 7. FIELD VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS WITH THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. CONCEAL TOP OF PC 0.5" TO 1.0 ", T' PRIMARY SIGN PANEL, T INSTALL SECONDARY SI( PANEL I" TO 3" BEN E/ THE PRIMARY SI( PANEL, T INSTALL SIGN PC VERTICALLY AND PLUI WITH 3- 6 "MIN EMBEDME DEPTH, T J R-ig TYPICAL SIGN PLACEMENT -PARK ROAD /PARKING LOT NTS 2%, TYP MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT AND SUBGRADE THICKNESS OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. �3/4' 18 " 18 "PER FT. #4 REBAR, TYP. m ch 6" MIN. CLASS 5 AGGREGATE 100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE QUARRY OR RECYCLED EQUAL (MnDOT 3138) PROTECT EXISTING BASE MATERIAL, TYP. STR -2 CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER NTS I V L/\VLLL/ V LI IIL.LL W HEELPATHS. NOTES: 1. PLACE FILTER FABRIC UNDER ROCK TO RESTRICT MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. 2. ADD AND REPLACE ROCK AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTRANCE. 3. REMOVE MATERIALS AND RESTORE SITE UPON COMPLETION. ERO -8 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NTS 1/2" DIA. RUBBER BLACK HOSE 11 GA. GALVANIZED WIRE. COIL EACH END TIGHTLY AROUND I BRANCHES TO REMAIN NATURAL FORM OF TREE APPROVED TREE DRESSING ON ALL ROOT AND CH CUTS OVER 1/2" DIAMETER. kP TRUNKS GREATER THAN 2-1/4" CALIPER i BURLAP. =TAL "T" POSTS TIN LENGTH NTAIN TREE BASE AT OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN PING GRADE, TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT. CH ATE SAUCER AROUND TREE. TING GROUND AND REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP FROM )T BALL. ROOT BALL APACTED TOPSOIL ,_RIFY BOTTOM OF PIT TO A DEPTH OF 6 ". NOTES: 1. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR TOPSOIL SPEC. 2. DO NOT DAMAGE MAIN ROOTS OR DESTROY ROOT BALL WHEN INSTALLING TREE STAKE. 3. WATER THOROUGHLY AFTER INSTALLATION. 4. REMOVE TREE RINGS AND STAKES TWO YEARS AFTER INSTALLATION. 5. PROVIDE DRAINAGE FOR PLANTING PIT IN IMPERMEABLE SOIL. GEN -1 TREE INSTALLATION DETAIL NTS THIN BRANCHES AND FOLIAGE (NOT ALL END TIPS) BY 1/3 RETAINING NORMAL PLANT SHAPE, THINNING, NOT REQUIRED ON EVERGREENS. EXISTING 3" GRADE MULCH MOUND PLANTING SOIL 4" TO FORM SAUCER 12". 12" REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL MIXTURE REMOVE PLANTING CONTAINERIZED SOIL PLANTS FROM THEIR CONTAINERS GEN-5 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NO SCALE C O CL L U U z � O � U) > +J W (0 0 L r� J :2 2 Q W Z= zQW- ELZQU)0 O Ln z) z IOzWQ =�zo=� >- m cn of�U) -°OUoz 0 zz U CL C Z) W COW W0 W0- Z w w Q =aof0Z< Qwcn z 0 z O 2 00 O N O Ln O Ln Z H rn Ln Ln � � iN LU M I\ LL C w Q Ln Q Ln z0 a a ww o. z z W J z z= ~ W = X O O J r� a z W � O '- U L_ L U O -O ro O W V 4-J O _0 U ^� 66 ^W 0) W _0 (0 H � W 4-J fu O J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE DETAILS C801 Sheet 09 of 09 NO Pal O 0 N N O a) 0 01 -0 X w 0) ro L r) 0 J Cz 0) m i 0 Q) L 0 ry U rn 0 d- J L Cz 0 0) Q) ry U) U w r, ry a n /aUG)- -F /O(UGt"F /aUG NON x c Lv JG II.. L\� a _� .r a a O LL- I LL- 11 r� v /BUG /aUG) r /O(UG)- — /0(U(;)'F /0(uG)-�au )-�/aUG) - F /0(UG)--�/0(UG)--�/0(UG -- 'F /aUG) ----I Q w \ \\ Q V �JGY Q O� uc / 1G�f /O( UGC —F /0( UGC- F /O(UG�— F /O(UG� —F/ F /G(UG}—F /0(UG /aUG) — / r� `Q N . ♦° 1 X N0' ON N N• / II ♦ oho ♦ � I i ♦ I / (o ♦ / o' ♦ 0 L.� I ,L / 3 I X 0 I` N° I X NQ) V '� GQ I DRAINAGE AREAS EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA: 0.57 ACRES IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 0 ACRES PERVIOUS SURFACE: 0.57 ACRES -- FLOW ARROW x ,�o O� X NQ) (0, �/ \ X✓ O� X C0UH7Y INGAID 10 N, . �O BACK OF CURB - � 0 g 0 r I -F /0(U /aUGr— F /aUGr -- -F/ aUG }� /al1G�— F /aUC�- ► -�—r /a UGC —F /aUG — F /aUGj---- F /O(UG)- — / aUG)--- F /O(UG)-- F /O(UG) —f /aUG) ----�F /aUG) —F/ aUG)— f /O(UG) —F/ aUG} --'F/ aUG) --F/ aUG — F/ al1G�— F /al1G�— F /a��— F /Ocl1C) ---f /aUG — F /aUG�� i��� 11/1x` Xr �° EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA Q� / U UG / aUG —F /aUG — F /aUGr —F /aUG —F /aUG — F /aUG) — 1�/O(UG�-- /0(UG�F /aUG F/ aUG — F /GiUG�— F /O(t� � /aUG — F /O(UG) ---f /aUG)--- f /G(UG) F C11.J1 /aucf /auG�f /auG�- F /auG� F/a ��—F /a off O I O Qo� .\ 0 ix N � O x IN x x I X � \ �p \ QUO' 0 X o0 \ x N NQ) NQ) 1 CIO \ 0 '0. O X NJ \ I N \ i -1-008— / (0* NOO x v x v II E3 ;` A \ICJ*' A / O X NZ i AA X (ZIP � � �oj oti \ �QO N 0 5 10 20 C 0 0. L U C) L) z a) O r6 A, L Z Q= Q a Z P- 0- 0 ~Q f5 0 O U) D�wCo z 1--0zOQ =ujz°'w C) = a >- mU)�0,-U) w o w w w ��WC)zzz_ CJa�Q::-) W rwcn�w0 m�� }w w d U J z w w LU <0 < Q Q LU Qwcn z w X zQ OU- r 00 O N C) Ln MLn z ck L� Ln E LV C Q Z �Q z° 0 oc a a z w w Qz z= w� X� o ° O J M d Q� � o U 0 L U O 0 V .� C^ C Q) Z3 —0 U ^� 66 W 0- (1) -0 ro O J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 6/13/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Existing Drainage Condition Exhm 1 Z rn 0 0 N \ N a) 0 01 -0 x w 0, ro L r) 0 J Cz 0) m 0 L 0 ry U rn 0 d- J L Cz 0 0) Q) ry U) U w rl ry a F /O(UG)-- F /aUGt -F /aUG J� 910 � N' 0 4 0 a ox c 0 CL COUNTY INGAID 10 p U) V) i r�O BACK OF CURB _ o - -- cn _ _ — (1) r r� ^0 0 UG U /0(UG) —F /aUG - -F /0(UG)- F /aUG / 0(UG L �0(UG) /0(UGC'F/ aUG' F /aUC�4(UGIaUG)'� /aUG��IaUC�� /aUG— F /aUGi_'p /aUG —F /0(U / aUG— F /aUC�— F /aUG��/ aUG— F /aUGj-- �-�—r/ aUG —F/ aUG— F /aUGi — { /0( UGC'_ p/ aUGi'—_ F/ 0( UG)--- F /OcUG�— F /aUGIOcUG�-F /aUGi'_'p /aUG— FIaUG�'F /aUG —F/ ( —F /a � p �� No' EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA O� 1010.63) } \ /�` O� U UG /aUG�-F /auc�- F /auc� -F /au / aUG — F /OiuG� —F /aUG — F /auGy —F /aUG —F /aUG) ----F /aUG) ----F /aUG /auG) UGC /auG�� /auc�" —F/ /aUG-- -F /auc F /o(uc) ---f /aUG -. , �0� (o 0 (oR Z Q 0 O G - -0 G ' -- ~ o Q F /GaG /GaG� G aUG F /aUCr --F /aUG -F /aUG— f /GaG 1011.03 ° uj z z 0 w Q }o°�o 1010.96 >- mc� � cn O _ n�www bol wQ,c7�� 1010.95 mLUCoQ o b- - [-- }w 0 z d W PROP SED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE _ — LU 0- 0 z Uj �p =<of0 < < co z of LU O� • 1010.14 1010.80 w X O x i,�00 `. U- x r N� p0 \ x o �� x� p,�p • z L Ln �� ►.® loo • �p �p • `, x 1009.72 1009.97 V wG to � 0 Vp LL y W U) Q X z o 1009.6 "3 ' �� bKo p� \ �p� a a z z Q) co w Q O x o 1009.52 NN p , PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR, TYP. 0 NO w _ X O 1009.55 V ,V tip 9 x,�o o� o 1009.47 1009.57 �p c� a ♦ `� 1010.34 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR, TYP. a �p ♦ / I ♦ x N FFE ♦ �` �� V +1009.62 ♦ 03 �N O O ._ ♦��' 0J AV 1009.59 - - 4M., p O N 1009.59 �` o � x po �o \ po 00 po 0 -0 ♦ / o 0 (o ♦ i _ _x N p O• ♦ - U >1 �� — a� � � O x 0- `0 •� � x �O •�� O O 4� ro 0 0 , NZ C \ / 0 J U 3 °0 06 N gyp. I (b I \ Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 6/13/2014 \NO I x NO GQ I x N I O� Designed By JB 3 \/ Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Proposed Drainage Conditions DRAINAGE AREAS PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA: 0.57 ACRES IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 0.15 ACRES PERVIOUS SURFACE: 0.42 ACRES —� FLOW ARROW N 0 5 10 20 Exhm2 it'n ti rls 71 �— Iry Nk is tiFi� is rls 71 �— Iry Nk is From: Josh Bowe To: Brad Martens (bmartens(dci.corcoran.mn.us); Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject: RE: Lake Independence Regional Trail - Corcoran Trailhead Parking Lot Date: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 11:33:39 AM Attachments: 20140709 TLI1401TrailheadCDs Sent.odf Brad and Kendra- I met with the Park District Forestry Dept. and the Snowmobile Club yesterday. Attached is the revised tree removal plan and snowmobile route. We are going to save the flowering crap at the northeast corner of the site and remove other trees that are in poor health or conflict with the trail route. Thanks, Josh Bowe PE, LEED® AP BD +C Civil Engineer Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 D 763.694.2063 1 C 612.280.7951 1 F 763.557.5248 j bowe(a)th reeriverspa rkd istrict. org From: Josh Bowe Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 8:37 AM To: Brad Martens (bmartens @ci.corcoran.mn.us); Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject: Lake Independence Regional Trail - Corcoran Trailhead Parking Lot Brad and Kendra- I want to provide follow -up information from the July 3rd Planning Commission meeting. • Attached is the detail of the proposed site waste receptacle. The flat cover will be replaced with a domed cover to keep animals from accessing the garbage. The final installed cost is around $1000 for this product. • The Park District standard is to not provide waste receptacles inside the restroom. The waste receptacles mounted to the bathroom wall require bags that are not typically used at the Park District. We would request that only a site waste receptacle be required for the ease of future maintenance. • The bathrooms remain unlocked during the nighttime hours. • I will be meeting our forestry department onsite to discuss the tree removal. Thanks, Josh Bowe PE, LEEDS AP BD +C Civil Engineer Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 D 763.694.2063 1 C 612.280.7951 1 F 763.557.5248 jbowe(a)threeriversparkdistrict .org 2" X 3" ( NOM. ) SLATS ( SEE SLAT OPTIONS ) 3/8" X 3 1/2" S.STL CAP SCR. W/ NUT � i I J \ 1 r- - -- <`7\ � - - -- 1 / 28 1/2" rULTtmTLLnt WR 3/8" X 1 " STL. BAR 1/4" X 1 1/4" S.STL LAG SCR. 5/16" X 1" S.STL HEX HD. CAP SCR. W/ S.STL WASHER AND NYLON LOCKNUT 3/16" X 6" SO. STL. PLATE - 3/16" X 1 1/4" STL BAR SUPPORT POST 12" a . . 24" 37 5/16" .d 32 GAL. c PLASTIC LINER 4. c 0 2 7/8" O.D. STL. PIPE 12" b 813/16" ❑ S -1 EMBEDMENT 2 3/8" O.D. STL PIPE s' 3/4" NP. 0 0 } O s" o NOTES ❑ "CEDAR" RECYCLED PLASTIC ❑ "GREY" RECYCLED PLASTIC ❑ "REDWOOD" RECYCLED PLASTIC ❑ "GREEN" RECYCLED PLASTIC ❑ OTHER 9/16" 0 HOLE 1.) ALL STL. MEMBERS COATED W/ ZINC RICH EPDXY THEN ( 4 PLACES) FINISHED W/ BLACK POLYESTER POWDER COATING ❑ S -2 SURFACE 2.) 1/2" X 3 3/4" EXPANSION ANCHOR BOLTS PROVIDED FOR S -2. - • • SCALE NONE TITLE - - RECEPTACLE DATE DRAWN 7/17/03 D u M o r inc. DRAWN BY : AH REV. DRAWING DATE REV. : 4/6/06 NUMBER 41- 3 2 P L/ 4 6 - 0 0 SHEET P.O. Box 142 Mifflintown, PA 17059 -0142 REV. BY : JSB B 1 OF 2 NOTE: 51 LF 3 1.) DURING ASSEMBLY PROCEDURE: DO NOT COMPLETELY TIGHTEN HARDWARE. 2.) THE ACTUAL PARTS WILL NOT BE NUMBERED: NUMBERS ONLY APPLY TO DRAWING. 3.) SEE SPEC. SHEET 1 FOR MOUNTING OPTIONS. STEP 1: USE 2 - PCS. HOOP FOR 30 GAL ( 3 ) 4 - PCS. "L" SUPPORT STRAP FOR 30 GAL ( 5 ) 8 - PCS. 5/16" X 1" SS. HEX HD. CAP SCR. ( 8 ) 8 - PCS. 5/16" SS. NYLON LOCK NUT ( 11 ) 16 - PCS. 5/16" SS. FLAT WASHER ( 13 ) ATTACH "L" SUPPORT STRAP ( 5 ) TO INSIDE HOOPS ( 3) USING HARDWARE ( 8, 11, & 13 ). TIGHTEN TO SNUG FIT. REPEAT UNTIL ALL "L" SUPPORT STRAPS ARE ATTACHED TO HOOPS STEP 2: USE 1 - PC. CENTER BRACKET ( 2 ) 8 - PCS. 5/16" X 1" SS, HEX HD. CAP SCR. ( 8 ) 8 - PCS. 5/16" SS. NYLON LOCK NUT ( 11 ) 16 - PCS. 5/16" SS. FLAT WASHER ( 13 ) ATTACH CENTER BRACKET TO STEP 1 ASSEMBLY USING HARDWARE ( 8, 11, & 13 ). TIGHTEN TO SNUG FIT. STEP 3: USE 24 - PCS. 2" X 3" X 28 1/2" PLASTIC SLAT ( 4 ) 48 - PCS. 1/4" X 1 1/4" SS. HEX HD. LAG SCR. ( 9 ) 48 - PCS. 1/4" SS. FLAT WASHER ( 12 ) ATTACH 2" X 3" X 28 1/2' PLASTIC SLATS ( 4 ) TO STEP 2 ASSEMBLY USING HARDWARE ( 9 & 12 ). TIGHTEN TO SNUG FIT. REPEAT UNTIL ALL SLATS ARE ATTACHED. SCALE : NONE DATE DRAWN : 7/17/C Du M o r inc. DRAWN BY : AWH DATE REV.: 4/6/06 P.O. Box 142 Mifflintown, PA 17059 -0142 REV. BY : 4/6/06 3 8 O O 0 13 11 13 5 (I Q STEP 1 ■ 8 o 2 13 ® 7 11 O 0 0 6 14 10 14 1 STEP 4: STEP 2 & STEP 5 UPON COMPLETION OF BASKET ASSEMBLY SQUARE ALL COMPONENTS THEN TIGHTEN ALL HARDWARE. STEP 5: USE 1 - PC. SUPPORT FOR SURFACE MOUNT ( 1 ) 1 - PC. 3/8" X 3 1/2" SS. HEX HD. CAP SCR. ( 6 ) 1 - PC. 3/8" SS. NYLON LOCK NUT ( 10 ) 2 - PC. 3/8" SS. FLAT WASHER ( 14 ) 2 - PCS. 3/8" X 3/8" SS. SKT. SET SCR. ( 7 ) ATTACH SURFACE MOUNT SUPPORT ( 1 ) TO STEP 4 ASSEMBLY USING HARDWARE ( 6, 10, 14, & 7 ) AND TIGHTEN ALL HARDWARE. STEP 6: TO ATTACH COVER, REMOVE ONE 1/4" X 1 1/4" LAG SCREW AND FASTEN OPEN END OF CABLE TO BASKET USING THE LAG REMOVED. STEP 7: MOUNT AND ANCHOR AS SPECIFIED. ITEM QTY I PART NO I DESCRIPTION 1 1 I 0- 41- 00- 03/S -2 I SUPPORT FOR SURFACE MOUNT 3 2 0- 41 -30 -01 HOOP FOR 30 GAL 4 24 0- 41- 30PL -06 2" X 3' X 28 1/2' PLASTIC SLAT 5 4 0- 41 -30 -07 "L" SUPPORT STRAP FOR 30 GAL 6 1 1 -12 -034 3/8' X 3 1/2' SS HEX HD CAP SCR 7 2 1 -12 -054 3/8' X 3/8' SS SKT SET SCR 8 16 1 -12 -061 5/16' X 1" SS HEX HD CAP SCR 9 48 1 -13 -004 1/4' X 1 1/4" SS HEX HD LAG SCR 10 1 1 -20 -007 3/8' SS NYLON LOCKNUT 11 16 1 -20 -016 5/16- SS NYLON LOCKNUT 12 48 1 -22 -006 1/4' SS FLAT WASHER 13 32 1 -22 -017 5/16' SS FLAT WASHER 14 2 1 -22 -024 3/8- SS FLAT WASHER TITLE : RECEPTACLE ASSEMBLY REV. B DRAWING NUMBER 41- 32PL/46 -00 z of 2 a 2 07 Ln N O N a, \ 0 0 U Q) ro L O J Cz 0) a� 0 m M Q) L O U rn U O J i L 0 0) Q) V) U L r1 ry a r; N 114 COR SEC. 18, T. 119, R. 23 Hennepin Co. C.I.M. O M 4 Q C/)Q >-ft CL J z� 00 Uz w� z= w �? Z M 33 N T 0o O 0 N U_ LL 00 O O WU �� J I— zz C/) V, LU Uj z� 0 a C� 33' �O W �p 00 0 o r\ o � 0 CO Z o z m 33 HENNEPI N COUNTY S TA TE AID M HI GHWA Y NO. 10, PLAT 8 M S 89 043'23" W 305.00' 181.25 92.75' 88.50' 123.75 C GUN7V RD 10 �— concrete curb & gutter Highway Easement N 89043'23" E Per Do. No. 8651543 Q 227.59, °�0 Q) rz M �� LO CEO _00 (� 0 �Q �� O • Iii ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW So. RI line of 6. 00 s PROPOSED '0. BITUMINOUS 2 36.00' - S89 °43'23" N LINE OF THE S 8 RODS 95.66' S 89 038'31 " W u1r1r �— chain link fence 1.2' south of property line EXISTING GARAGE LO LO �0O O o O O Lo O Lo O M Q) N 00 00 CO ° O O � O °O o C/) G+ O V C/) 00 M O 0 /1 L PROPOSED VAULT LATRINE 88.50' \i 123.75' ` 212.89 ; (meas) 212.25 (deed) S 89 046'24" W EXISTING SNOWMOBILE TRAIL, TYP. N Lo M 00 M O N° O M NORTH LINE OF NW 114 OF— NE 114, SEC. 18, T. 119, R. 23 2319.14 o N 89 04323" E rA o. 10 found 1 "iron pipe, up 1 :�G' W N OM N O 0) 0) C/) I found 1 " iron pipe PROPOSED SNOWMOBILE TRAIL Received July 9, 2014 C 0 a L u NE COR OF NE z o SEC. 18, T. 119, Hennepin Co. C. > 0 10 20 40 L L X zU_ ��Qw O00 Q��ZF 0-11 LL. a,�t 0 U) zIwC O N Z �0z O Ln LU wQ O � =2i O 0 0L[=-- M Lf) >_ m U) w Ln o- w w w U[WC? °zz Ln [� U a- D W M rwcn�w0 mOf � }w LLJdU JZLU w Q Q =Q�ozQ Qwcn z f Q ro O L L O U o O rV .� L C Z3 -0 U ^� 66 W 4� _0 -0 ro 0 O J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Site Layout C001 Sheet 03 of 09 L X zU_ O00 a,�t O N O Ln O � M Lf) Ln Ln [� W M 0 L y C Q d' Ln W Q H oG Z 0 a a zw W Q z_ 0 � � z= ~ L X� o Z J O M d Q ro O L L O U o O rV .� L C Z3 -0 U ^� 66 W 4� _0 -0 ro 0 O J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Site Layout C001 Sheet 03 of 09 a 2 07 0 N O N rn a) 0 01 /0(UG)----- F /O(UG) - -F a 0 Q O 0) 0 Q) ro L 0 J Cz pl m 0 (0 N L L 0 ry U rn U 0 J L 0 0) Q) ry / U) U ry a / r-; / I J: i ro,,- INSTALL INLET PROTECTION PER DETAIL ERO -17 REMOVE 46 LF B624 \ CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER i /p(UG) F /0(UG }� /0( UGC— F /0(UG��ONG}— F /0(UG } ° —F /0( UGC— F/ 0( UGj-- F /0(UG�— F /0(UG}--- F /0(UG�— F /0(UG /0( UGC-- F /0(UG }— F /0(UGy�F /0( UGC —F /0( UGC —F /0( UGC— F/ 0( UNG}'— F/ 0( UG) -- F/ 0( UG�F /0(UG�� /0(UG)-- F /0(UG)- --� /0( UGC —F /0( UG) —F /0( UGC— F /0(UG}— 'F /0(UG}— F /0(UG} -�� —F, Ic0l /F IC%JG F/ 0( UG) — F/ 0( UG) — F/ 0( UG)—/ 0( UG)--- F /0(UG�— /0(UG— F /0(UG ) G F /O(UG) F /O(UG) — / O( UG)— / O( UG )—/O(UG)— F /O(UG) — F /O(UG) F /O(UG) — /O(UG) F /O(UG) R ROW — E(OH- � T ROW ROW RO G � F 0 UG i"� RO ) E(OH�(OH— (} { /O(wy—F /0 40H)_ —( /0(UG)—/0(UG) F /0(UG— — F /O(UG) F /O(UG� —F /0 )-- F /0(UG }� 0 UG Q� O� CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. r O� PC 0 i ------------ 0 +50 \rt , \ v", - < _ — _---I—- — — — — — — — — v I I 1317 LF SILT FENCE SEE DETAIL ERO -8 SALVAGE AND'STOCKPILE 6" TOPSOIL AT LOCATION �HOWN ON PLAN 210 CY TOTAL / L z v � 1+ I / - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I U L r 00 O U .I I o 0 o � C rnLr) Q) Z M , U 66 ^� H � [� LV _0 fo LL H 3 I Q Z L- J 0 Q TLI 1401 o~c 5/14/2014 a a zw NS w Qz LL_ 3 I 0 z= ~ w � I X LL_ I O 3 M d I 0 I L E3 %i REMOVE AND GRUB TREE, TYP. 1001j �� �/X jl 1 R K CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ----- ___I__ SEE DETAIL ERO -1 r ♦ ''\j z v � 1+ I Q - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I U L r 00 O U .I r ♦ ''\j STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AT THIS LOCATION IN FORM OF A BERM. FINAL BERM SHALL BE ROUGHLY 3' -5' IN HEIGHT. CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE TOPSOIL FOR FILL IN ON -SITE DISTURBED AREAS IN ALL NON -PAVED AREAS AND LEAVE REMAINING. UTILIZE NON - ORGANIC SOILS FOR FILL IN PAVED AREAS. PROVIDE SWALE BETWEEN BERM AND PARKING LOT - DISCHARGING TO THE SOUTH. Received July 9, 2014 C 0 L U Cn LI) z a) O� (n > w (a ry 0 Y L �Q Q � = ��Z� 11 U)D w� _ ow _— — �Oz0Q - -- =�za- wQ o =� ~ � O w F O �o;www w � LL rwcnof w0 w O U_j z w 0 1 = Q o z Q 1 � _��Q W(n 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 \7e P .......... 111 pj ®`• ®A N 0 5 10 20 �c 0 z w z w w z o ♦ Q - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U L r 00 O U I STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AT THIS LOCATION IN FORM OF A BERM. FINAL BERM SHALL BE ROUGHLY 3' -5' IN HEIGHT. CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE TOPSOIL FOR FILL IN ON -SITE DISTURBED AREAS IN ALL NON -PAVED AREAS AND LEAVE REMAINING. UTILIZE NON - ORGANIC SOILS FOR FILL IN PAVED AREAS. PROVIDE SWALE BETWEEN BERM AND PARKING LOT - DISCHARGING TO THE SOUTH. Received July 9, 2014 C 0 L U Cn LI) z a) O� (n > w (a ry 0 Y L �Q Q � = ��Z� 11 U)D w� _ ow _— — �Oz0Q - -- =�za- wQ o =� ~ � O w F O �o;www w � LL rwcnof w0 w O U_j z w 0 1 = Q o z Q 1 � _��Q W(n 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 \7e P .......... 111 pj ®`• ®A N 0 5 10 20 �c 0 z w z w w z o Lu Q z< O U L r 00 O U I I o 0 o � STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AT THIS LOCATION IN FORM OF A BERM. FINAL BERM SHALL BE ROUGHLY 3' -5' IN HEIGHT. CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE TOPSOIL FOR FILL IN ON -SITE DISTURBED AREAS IN ALL NON -PAVED AREAS AND LEAVE REMAINING. UTILIZE NON - ORGANIC SOILS FOR FILL IN PAVED AREAS. PROVIDE SWALE BETWEEN BERM AND PARKING LOT - DISCHARGING TO THE SOUTH. Received July 9, 2014 C 0 L U Cn LI) z a) O� (n > w (a ry 0 Y L �Q Q � = ��Z� 11 U)D w� _ ow _— — �Oz0Q - -- =�za- wQ o =� ~ � O w F O �o;www w � LL rwcnof w0 w O U_j z w 0 1 = Q o z Q 1 � _��Q W(n 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 \7e P .......... 111 pj ®`• ®A N 0 5 10 20 �c 0 z w SHEET TITLE Removals Erosion Control C201 Sheet 05 of 09 z w w z o Lu Q z< O U L r 00 O U O O N o 0 o � C rnLr) Q) Z M , U 66 ^� H � [� LV _0 fo LL H o Q Z L- J W Q TLI 1401 o~c 5/14/2014 a a zw NS w Qz z= ~ w � X 00 J O M d SHEET TITLE Removals Erosion Control C201 Sheet 05 of 09 z Q � O U L L O U O o V C .� c Q) Z3 -0 U 66 ^� ^W _ ^0 W _0 fo H� W a-J o J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Removals Erosion Control C201 Sheet 05 of 09 ►d- N �o O N rn \ 0 u 0 0 ro a� ro L 0 Nt C O N m / 0 co N C_ ro L O U rn O J ru fQ C 0 0) U) U Lu ry a / /O(UG) F /O(UG) --F, 0 j 0 Q " g 1012 / I Jd LL_ LL. LL HAZEL 8 TOTAL D � Oo BACK OF CURB /O(UG) f/ O( UG�P/ 0 (UG)- F /O(UG)-- -- F /O(UG)-- --F /0( UGC- F/ 0( UG }- �F /0(UG}- f /0(UG }- F /0(UGj�f /0( UGC- F /0(UG} 9q--F }- --F /0( UGC- F /0(UG)- F /0(UG) F /0(UG)_ FufUG F /0(UC� ) - F /0(UG (�I/ON Y B L_ R/R Y !� N N//�NN 5 TOTAL �JO� / F a /0wr -r-I F /0(UG) /O(UG) F /O(UG)- F /O(UG /O(UG}— F /O(UG) �-FJO � ROW ROW G , RO n \ ROW �-- - - -- E -ROV ( UG � / / R E(0 � (OH )- OH� (0 -)_ (') 0(UG F /0(UG) -/0( UGCF /0(UG�/0(UG`-- F /0(UG�F /0 /0(UG �F /0(UG� /0(UG�/0 - Q� 0o �o4 p° PROPOSED 10' WIDE SNOWMOBILE TRAIL D n 7 I 0 I I �2 1/2" WHITE OAK N.I.C.- 1 +00 1 +50 0 +50 • I 1 • /O(UG) INSTALL 24 "x24" STEEL "TRPD TRAILHEAD PARKING LOT" SIGN. SIGN PANEL PROVIDED BY OWNER FURNISH AND INSTALL CONC VALLEY GUTTER PER STR -2, REMOVE, SALVAGE AND REPLACE EXISTING FRAME AND -GRATE ----- Received July 9, 2014 RETE PVI STA: 0 +94.85 PVI STA: 0+30.11 GRADE BREAK STA = 0 +00.00 K: 52.42 CD I-) PVI ELEV: 1011.94 CT CV -1 0 VC: 28.529 K: 17.23 Lq Cq o AD: -2.34% O Iq C801 (D VC: 40.309 o° U CL U HIGH PT. STA: 0 +1 1.91 N v STO P U, 00 HIGH PT ELEV: 1011.92 6 w .L m O LO + O 00 -- - - - -- z 0 0 00 00 00 - __ 0 00 00 - - - -- -- R 1 -1 w w H (n -30X30 - - - j � - - - - Lu a 0 '/O(UG) /O(UG)- --F /O(UG)- -- F /O(UG / O(UG L CAUTION 1010.63 1010.56 / BURIED 1 1 } FIBER -OPTIC ' ! 1 Q W Q z (UG F/ G F /0(UG }F /0(UG /0(UG /0(UG /0(UG�)F /0(UGj- (j- ��f�} //0- (UG)�--- f /0(UG / (UG) -- 0(UG ON E(OH V �1 (fir- R V �I (01' R( E(OH 0- z a 0 O LL Ln • 1 1 O z O Q QwQ � aw 1011.03 a • • cn 1 �moof�o 1010.96 w • • • IV 1 I H°�Iw -0Z 1 IV 1 wof w�zz 1 1010.92' CD v��w�� LL n = 1 COW W — � 1 1 w a v_j z_ w W Q of o 0 r---------------- `7------ - - - - -- -- - - - - -� 1 =�oQWC �n 1 1009.61 1010.60 1 I 1 1 009.34 X1009.56 - - - - - -- - - - -_ - -, 09.20- . �' - -- - CNSTLIMITS 1009. 1 61 9' 0 0 rn i 1009.04 - - - - - - - -_- PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR, TYP. 1008.92 ° 1009. PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR, TYP. • ; • �� ° SURFACE MOUNT DUMOR TRASH RECEPTAC- LE,'41-32PL' ° WITH GRAINGER DOME TOP 4PGF3 � FFE a 1009.11 ° \ ° Q IV ` O 1009.08 - rn 1009.08 � `- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �y--- n 7� Aik PVI STA: 1+35.21 PVI STA: 0 +94.85 PVI STA: 0+30.11 GRADE BREAK STA = 0 +00.00 K: 52.42 CD I-) PVI ELEV: 1011.94 CT CV -1 0 VC: 28.529 K: 17.23 Lq Cq _ r AD: -2.34% O Iq O (D VC: 40.309 o° U a U HIGH PT. STA: 0 +1 1.91 N v o U, 00 HIGH PT ELEV: 1011.92 6 w + O LO + O 00 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 00 m w w n1iC7 PVI STA: 1+35.21 PVI STA: 0 +94.85 PVI ELEV: 1010.50 GRADE BREAK STA = 0 +00.00 K: 52.42 CD I-) AD: 0.540 CT CV -1 0 VC: 28.529 Lq Cq _ r CV O Iq O (D O o° U U U U +3 O p O 0 O U, 00 Cr vi w > PVI STA: 1+35.21 -2.23% PVI ELEV: 1009.82 GRADE BREAK STA = 0 +00.00 K: 64.81 CD I-) AD: - 0.40% CT CV -1 0 VC: 25.867 � CV `t O — U7 LO N O Iq O +o +o U U U U GRADE BREAK STA = 1 +61.15 O p O CLr- V = I UUY.ZC)U -2.23% CY) GRADE BREAK STA = 0 +00.00 01 01 CD I-) ELEV = 101 1.905 CT CV -1 0 -2• �8% 0 CTS 0p co \ 01 CV CT CT U7 1 008 r GRADE BREAK STA = 1 +61.15 CLr- V = I UUY.ZC)U 0 +00 1 +00 i 0 m D n CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL TR -5, INSET 'A' R7 -8M 12 X 18 CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORATION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS. AT A MINIMUM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL: 1.1. RESPREAD SALVAGED TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DEBRIS FREE AND PULVERIZED TO A DEPTH OF 6 ". 1.2. RESTORE DISTURBED VEGETATED AREA WITH: • "TRPD SEED MIX" @175 LBS /AC (SEE SPECS) • MnDOT TYPE 2 (22 -0 -10) FERTILIZER @ 350 LBS /AC • CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, ALL NATURAL STITCHING ONLY. RESTORATION SHALL BE PAID BY UNIT PRICES, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS USED. HAZEL 5 TOTAL N.I.C. NANNYBERRY 7 TOTAL N.I.C. Na v y, UTILITY NOTE: THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THE PLAN IS UTILITY LEVEL QUALITY "D ", UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI /ASCE 38 -02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY! THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT DOES NOT WARRANT THIS INFORMATION TO BE ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR IN WAR N 1 N G COOPERATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANY IS CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE LOCATION IDREQUIRED STATE ONE CALL BEFORE DIGGING. AND DEPTH OF ALL UNDERGROUND 1-800-252-1166 UTILITIES. BY LAW N 0 5 10 20 O Z C� w w w I o z 0 LL O N O Ln O � O Ln z c� Ln Ln [� W M I\ c F, L N C L) A w Ln Q a z 0 az Lu w J Z z= Lu ~ = X 00 o� r� a _ z f� .— O L U O -0 o � oC V 4-) O _0 U 66 Q (0 H � fu o J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Construction Plan C601 Sheet 07 of 09 O CY) 10 r11 01 01 CD I-) d CT CV N Cr 0 CTS 0p co ;T CT 01 CV CT CT U7 r r O p O 0 O U, 00 Cr 00 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 +00 1 +00 i 0 m D n CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL TR -5, INSET 'A' R7 -8M 12 X 18 CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORATION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS. AT A MINIMUM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL: 1.1. RESPREAD SALVAGED TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DEBRIS FREE AND PULVERIZED TO A DEPTH OF 6 ". 1.2. RESTORE DISTURBED VEGETATED AREA WITH: • "TRPD SEED MIX" @175 LBS /AC (SEE SPECS) • MnDOT TYPE 2 (22 -0 -10) FERTILIZER @ 350 LBS /AC • CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, ALL NATURAL STITCHING ONLY. RESTORATION SHALL BE PAID BY UNIT PRICES, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS USED. HAZEL 5 TOTAL N.I.C. NANNYBERRY 7 TOTAL N.I.C. Na v y, UTILITY NOTE: THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THE PLAN IS UTILITY LEVEL QUALITY "D ", UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI /ASCE 38 -02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY! THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT DOES NOT WARRANT THIS INFORMATION TO BE ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR IN WAR N 1 N G COOPERATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANY IS CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE LOCATION IDREQUIRED STATE ONE CALL BEFORE DIGGING. AND DEPTH OF ALL UNDERGROUND 1-800-252-1166 UTILITIES. BY LAW N 0 5 10 20 O Z C� w w w I o z 0 LL O N O Ln O � O Ln z c� Ln Ln [� W M I\ c F, L N C L) A w Ln Q a z 0 az Lu w J Z z= Lu ~ = X 00 o� r� a _ z f� .— O L U O -0 o � oC V 4-) O _0 U 66 Q (0 H � fu o J U Proj. No. TLI 1401 Issue Date 5/14/2014 Designed By JB Drawn By NS Checked By JB SHEET TITLE Construction Plan C601 Sheet 07 of 09 L A N D From Site to Finish 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 TO: Corcoran City Council Agenda Item F O R M Tel: 612- 252 -9070 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 www.landform.net FROM: Mary Matze through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: July 16, 2014 for the July 24, 2014 City Council Meeting RE: Request for Topography Exemption and Wetland Delineation Exemption for Mike Patnode at 22610 County Road 50 (PID 20- 119 -23 -43 -0003) (City File No. 14 -014) 60 -DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: August 19, 2014 1. Application Request Mike Patnode is requesting approval of an exemption from the following survey requirements: a. topographic survey b. wetland delineation Section 930.020, Subd. 6(B)2 of the City Code allows the City Council to waive the topography requirements for lots greater than 3 acres and the City Council has previously granted exemptions from the wetland delineation requirements. 2. Context The 78.33 -acre parcel is unplatted and has 8 development rights remaining. The existing farmstead is located in the south central portion of the property. The applicant is planning to request preliminary plat approval for a lot and an outlot. Zoning and Land Use The property is zoned Rural Residential and is guided Rural / Ag Residential. Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties are all zoned Rural Residential and guided Rural / Ag Residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site The draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows potential wetland in the northeast corner of proposed Outlot A and the aerial photo shows a potential wetland in proposed Lot 1, Block 1. Landforms, SensiblyGreen and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 2 3. Analysis of Request 0 It is the applicant's desire to subdivide the property to create a 10 -acre parcel for the existing home and a 68.33 -acre parcel for farming and potential future development. The development rights map shows 8 development rights remaining on the parcel. At the time of platting, the developer should indicate to the city how these rights should be applied to the parcels. Generally, we would apply all 8 development rights to Outlot A. The National Wetlands Survey shows potential wetlands on the eastern edge of proposed Outlot A and a small wetland on proposed Lot 1, Block 1. The only time the city can require easements over wetlands and required wetland buffers is at the time of platting. Therefore, staff recommends that a wetland delineation be completed for the proposed Lot 1, Block 1. • While no new development is proposed for the existing home, staff recommends that a wetland delineation be completed in order to provide the required wetland buffers and setbacks. • Staff recommends approval of a wetland waiver on proposed Outlot A. A wetland delineation can be performed if and when it is platted. • Staff recommends approval of the topography waiver for the entire site because no new development is proposed. A topographic survey should be provided with the building permit for the area where new development is proposed. If the exemption is approved, the applicant would proceed with a preliminary and final plat to allow subdivision of the property. The concept plan shows the proposed outlot wrapping around the proposed homestead lot. Staff notes, that the plan shows the required 200 feet of lot width required to create a lot in those areas, however, the eastern strip appears to have a wetland the would limit the ability to access that portion of the lot. Although no new development is proposed at this time, the applicant should be aware that a future road, drive, or other construction in this area could be difficult. The Council may wish to comment on the concept plan, but any comments are advisory only and would be non - binding. 4. Recommendation Move to approve Resolution 2014 -41 approving the topographic survey exemption and wetland delineation. Approval of the exemptions requires a 3/5 vote of the City Council. Patnode Topographic and Wetland Exemption (14 -014) July 16, 2014 i • Attachments a. Resolution Approving Topographic and Wetland Exemption b. Site Location Map c. Applicant's Concept Graphics Patnode Topographic and Wetland Exemption (14 -014) July 16, 2014 0 • City of Corcoran July 24, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -41 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION EXEMPTION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 22610 COUNTY ROAD 50 (PID 20- 119 -23 -43 -0003) (CITY FILE NO. 14 -014) WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a waiver from the topography and wetland delineation requirements for a preliminary plat as allowed in Section 930.020, Subd. 6(B)2 and 3 of the Corcoran Subdivision Ordinance for property legally described as follows: Part of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 20, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Corcoran City Council reviewed this item at their meeting on July 24, 2014; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the topographic survey exemption and the wetland delineation waiver based on the following findings and conditions: 1. The 78.33 -acre property has 8 development rights remaining. The property has one single family home on the 78.33 -acre parcel and the remainder of the property is currently farmed. At this time there is no new construction proposed. 2. A topographic survey exemption for the entire site parcel and a wetland delineation waiver for proposed Outlot A is granted subject to the following: a. A wetland delineation shall be required with the preliminary plat for proposed Lot 1, Block 1. If there are wetlands on site, the applicant will need to provide wetland buffers, buffer setbacks and buffer monuments if required by Section 1050.020 of the City Code. b. A wetland delineation shall be required for proposed Outlot A if and when it is platted. c. A topographic survey shall be provided prior to any new construction for the area immediately surrounding any proposed construction. 3. The existing use is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 4. The use is generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. 5. No other exemptions or variances are granted. 6. Granting the topography and wetland delineation exemption neither grants nor implies approval of any plat. Page 1 of 2 City of Corcoran July 24, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -41 VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Lynch, Diane ❑ Thomas, Ron Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 24th day of July 2014. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 2 of 2 City Seal Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map '16ff RLr9rrrr-FT '_ W( "MA 1 I- - - ow ti Parcel Abstract Market 20- 119 -23 -43 -0003 ID: $741,100 Owner Tax Michael L Patnode Rev Trust Name: (Payable: 2014) Parcel 22610 Co Rd No 50 Address: Corcoran, MN 55340 Property Date: Farm Type: Home- Homestead stead: Parcel 78.33 acres Area: 3,411,877 sq ft Page I of 1 Map Scale: 1" = 800 ft. N Print Date: 7/10/2014 -(k This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A T hink Green." http: / /gis.co.hennepin.mn.usI Property /printldefault.aspx ?C= 451793.0297000003,4994056.... 7/10/2014 Abstract Market $741,100 Total: Tax $6,826.80 Total: (Payable: 2014) Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: Page I of 1 Map Scale: 1" = 800 ft. N Print Date: 7/10/2014 -(k This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A T hink Green." http: / /gis.co.hennepin.mn.usI Property /printldefault.aspx ?C= 451793.0297000003,4994056.... 7/10/2014 Parcel Address: 22610 Co Rd No 50 Corcoran, MN 55340 P".- 20- 119 -23 -42 Abbreviated description Part of the West Half Southeast Quarter of Section 20, Township Range 23, Hennepin C Minnesota. Concept Plan Prepared fora Mlle Po to ode SCHOBORG D SERVICES INC. SCALE 200 0 100 200 400 1 inch = 200 feet 6 -18 -14 Parcel Address: 22610 Co Rd No 50 Corcoran, MN 55340 P".- 20- 119 -23 -42 Abbreviated description Part of the West Half Southeast Quarter of Section 20, Township Range 23, Hennepin C Minnesota. Concept Plan Prepared for: Mike Potnode SCHOBORG D SERVICES INC. SCALE 200 0 100 200 400 1 inch = 200 feet 6 -18 -14 Agenda Item: _ L A N D F 0 R M From Site to Finish 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Mary Matze through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: July 16, 2014 for the July 24, 2014 City Council Meeting • • • Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 www.landform.net RE: Council Request for Additional Information about Public Notice Standards 60 -DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: N/A Background At the June 26, 2014 City Council meeting, a resident asked the Council to consider expanding public hearing notification standards and suggested that Corcoran consider Plymouth and Medina's practices for posting notices on properties. The Council directed staff to research standards and report back. We prepared a summary that compares the City of Corcoran's notification requirements for public hearings to the State Statute requirements and a discussion of public hearing notification standards in comparable cities. 2. Analysis Overview The State of Minnesota requires municipalities to hold public hearings for the adoption of preliminary plats, zoning ordinances and amendments, variances, conditional use permits, interim use permits and a variety of other non -land use issues. Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statutes requires municipalities to give notice in an official newspaper and to mail a description of the action to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property for the land use applications referenced above. Corcoran's ordinances are in compliance with the current state statutes. An informational memo from the League of Minnesota Cities describing the State requirements for public hearing notices is attached. Some Minnesota cities have adopted stricter public notice standards by ordinance, while others go above and beyond the state requirements by practice. Generally the cities with more extensive public outreach practices build the additional costs into their annual staffing budgets and fee schedules. A summary of the practices for public hearings and associated public notice standards is described below. Landform�, SensiblyG, en and Site to Finish are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 0 Public Hearing Notice Practices in Other Minnesota Cities Development signs • • The City of Plymouth's ordinance requires the city to post public hearing announcement signs on properties that have applied for amendments to the Land Use Guide Plan classification, zoning classification and applications for preliminary plats. The City also posts public hearing signs on non residential parcels located within 500 feet of a residential property for variances, conditional use permits, interim use permits and major site plan amendments. The cost of posting the signs is paid for by the applicant at the time of application and is listed on the fee schedule. The application fee for development signs was established to pay for the cost of purchasing the signs, but not the staff time to install the signs. In Medina, signs are posted by the public works department staff on properties 10 days in advance of actions that require a public hearing, however, no formal policy or ordinance has been adopted to support the practice. There is no additional fee for the signs or staff time to install the signs. Notification to nearby property owners While the State Statutes require notice to be sent to all property owners within 350 feet of the subject property, some communities have increased this distance —by ordinance — according to the action or location of the subject property. Plymouth has extended the notification area for text and map amendments to 750 feet, conditional use permits to 500 feet and 1,320 feet for actions that involve correctional and waste facilities. Medina's notification area is extended to 1,000 feet for properties in rural districts, while keeping with the state's requirement of 350 feet for all other districts. Maple Grove and Rogers' city code requires a 500 -foot notification area for their PUD districts, but maintains the state's 350 -foot rule for other required notifications. The City Planner for Maple Grove noted that they typically use the 500 -foot standard for all of their public hearings. If city staff in Hugo, Lake Elmo or Minnetonka, feel that the proposed project will have a far - reaching impact, the area to which public notices are sent is increased to cover the area of impact. This is a discretionary action by city staff. Newspaper Publication All cities reviewed follow the State standard of a 10 day advance notice in a qualified newspaper. Other tools The communities that we spoke with don't necessarily have the staff time or resources to do extensive outreach, however, many communities do take extra measures to inform residents of upcoming public hearings and other zoning actions. Like Corcoran, the cities of Plymouth, Medina, Lake Elmo and Minnetonka post public hearing notices on their web site. Medina and Lake Elmo Public Hearing Notice Summary 2 July 24, 2014 0 i include announcements in a printed newsletter and Lake Elmo also includes it in an e- newsletter. For high impact actions that don't require a public hearing, Rogers posts a printed notice of public hearings at City Hall, the Police Department, and the local liquor store. Corcoran also posts notice of all public hearings at City Hall. Summary The City of Corcoran is in compliance with the standards set by Minnesota State Statutes. Of the communities reviewed, Plymouth has adopted the strongest measures to notify residents about proposed zoning changes. Other communities have made provisions to increase the area of notifications to residents based on land use or zoning action. The attached table shows a side by side comparison of practices in the communities that were researched. If the City Council wishes to expand the public hearing notice standards, several actions could be taken: a. Corcoran could increase the number of property owners that receive mailed public notices by expanding the distance requirements for public notices. Planners at other cities did note the difficulty in deciding the extent of limits of the required area. This would increase printing and postage costs, but would have little increase in staff time. b. Consider a practice of installing signs on properties 10 days in advance of a public hearing. There would be an initial cost to the city to purchase the signs and an increase in planning staff time to identify the location of the signs and additional public works time to install and remove the signs. We have requested information from Medina and Plymouth regarding the initial sign costs and hope to have an update for the City Council at the meeting. Look at creating a social media policy and plan by the end of the year. This is on the City Administrator's work plan for this year. 3. Action This is informational only. No action is required, but the City Council may wish to provide direction to staff if changes are desired. Attachments a. Public Notice Standard Summary Spreadsheet b. League of Minnesota Cities Memo — Public Hearing Requirements Public Hearing Notice Summary July 24, 2014 Comparison of Public Hearin¢ Notification Standards -- prepared July 14, 2014 Has social media, does not post public hearings. No Social Media No Social Media None Facebook, not used for public hearing announcements No social media outlets Twitter Feed - No public hearing announcements. Post sign on Post on Web Newsletter (online City Notice to landowners (required distance) Newspaper publication property Site / print) Notes State Statute 350 feet - Required before the adoption of any 10 days in advance Ch. 462, Subd 3 zoning ordinance or amendment, and before the granting of variances, conditional use permits, or rezonings. Corcoran 350 feet for Conditional Use Permits, Variances, 10 days in advance Zoning Ordinance Amendments, Zoning Map Amendments, Site Plan Review, Subdivisions Plymouth *750 feet for text and map amendments and plats 10 days in advance Yes Yes No *Section 21022 requires signs to be posted on properties that involve amendments *500 feet for conditional use permits, except of the Land Use Guide Plan Classification; proposed amendments of zoning correctional and waste facilities which require 1320 classification; and applications for preliminary plats. feet. *Two notices are sent for Comprehensive plan *Signs shall be installed on all non - residential sites that are located within 500 lineal amendment, rezonings and PUD feet of any residential property and are the subject of any of the following applications: variance, conditional use permit, interim use permit, or major site plan including amendments thereto. *Applicant is charged a fee of $16S for a development sign on one street frontage, plus $50 per sign for each additional street frontage. Medina *1000 feet in rural areas 10 days in advance Yes Yes Yes - Print Medina posts signs for all actions that have a public hearing. *350 feet for all other zoning districts *The City Council may waive the mailed notice requirement for a city -wide amendment initiated by the Planning Commission or City Council. Maple Grove *500 feet for almost all public hearings 10 days in advance No Yes Yes - Printed Residents can also sign up to receive notifications about upcoming council actions on *350 ft. for variances Quarterly the web site. Rogers *500 feet for PUD 30 days in advance No No No If there is a bigger action that doesn't require a public hearing, the action is posted at *350 ft. for variances City Hall, the Police Department, and the liquor store. Hugo *300 feet for CUP, Interim Use Permit 10 days in advance No No No Mailed notice boundary is extended on a case by case basis, depending on the *350 for boundary changes anticipated impact of the action. Lake Elmo 350 feet for all processes that require a public 10 days in advance No Yes Yes - Monthly in Mailed notice boundary is extended on a case by case basis, depending on the hearing. print; Weekly in e- anticipated impact of the action. newsletter 400 feet for all processes that require a public 10 days in advance No Yes - with a No Mailed notice boundary is extended on a case by case basis, depending on the hearing. description anticipated impact of the action. Two notices are mailed to residents for high- impact of the projects. project, plans, and the staff report. Minnetonka Has social media, does not post public hearings. No Social Media No Social Media None Facebook, not used for public hearing announcements No social media outlets Twitter Feed - No public hearing announcements. rote LEAGUE of MINNESOTA CITIES INFORMATION MEMO Public Hearings Understand the purposes, requirements and procedures for holding public hearings when making city land use decisions. RELEVANT LINKS: I. Land use public hearings Most city actions do not require a prior public hearing. A public hearing is only required if a specific law or charter provision mandates that a hearing Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. be held. Public hearings are required before the adoption of any zoning 3. Minn. Stat. § 462.3595, subd. ordinance or amendment, and before the granting of variances, conditional 2. use permits, or rezonings. II. Purpose The fundamental purpose for holding a public hearing is to ensure due process — the protection of individual rights prior to governmental action. Due process encourages objective decision making by providing all persons who have an interest in the city's decision with the opportunity to be heard. A. Notice Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. Notice must be given at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and notice must 3. be mailed to property owners within a 350 -foot radius of the land in question. Public hearings should include a complete disclosure of what is being proposed, and a fair and open assessment of the issues raised. A public hearing must include an opportunity for the general public and interested parties to hear and see all information and to ask questions, provide additional information, express support or opposition, or suggest modifications to the proposal. B. Role of chairperson The chairperson has the responsibility of conducting the public hearing. The chairperson should explain the procedure to be followed before the meeting begins. People should know when they will be allowed to participate and the rules of conduct. Order must also be established at the beginning of the hearing. The chairperson should explain that the hearing is a formal procedure, that everyone will be given an opportunity to participate, and that comments should be germane and concise. If many people share the same viewpoint, the chairperson should encourage the appointment of a spokesperson to avoid repetitive testimony. This material is provided as general information and is not a substitute for legal advice. Consult your attorney for advice concerning specific situations. 145 University Ave. West www.lmc.org 3/8/2010 Saint Paul, MN 55103 -2044 (651) 281 -1200 or (800) 925 -1122 © 2013 All Rights Reserved RELEVANT LINKS: III. Hearing procedures While most of the following discussion is applicable to all public hearings, it is necessary to check state law or your city's charter for specific procedural requirements for other types of decisions. Many cities believe that a formal meeting procedure is inappropriate. Land use decisions, however, may be subject to judicial review; therefore, a formal hearing procedure should be followed. The following procedure is suggested to allow opportunities for everyone to participate. A. Staff presentation City staff should identify the subject property, describe the nature of the application, present the zoning and planning issues, and explain the action to be taken by the planning commission, board of appeals, or city council. The commission, board, or councilmembers should ask the staff questions to ensure that they fully understand the information presented. Applicants should also be given the opportunity to ask questions of staff, to provide additional information, or to clarify information presented by staff or included in the planning report. City staff should also entertain questions from the general public or other interested parties about the information presented. B. Applicant's presentation In this portion of the hearing, the applicant has the opportunity to present his or her case. This is the applicant's opportunity to present factual information to demonstrate the proposal's compliance with the city's comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance standards. The planning commission, board of appeals, or city council should ask the applicant whatever questions they have about the proposal. The public should also be allowed to ask questions of the applicant. No statement, however, either for or against the proposal should be accepted at this point. C. Statements from the public The chairperson should ask for statements from the public in support of the application. Even though large crowds against a proposal may be intimidating, the chairperson must ensure an opportunity for those who wish to speak in favor of the proposal. The chairperson should then seek statements from the public in opposition to the application. The chairperson should encourage people to present factual evidence for public consideration. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 3/8/2010 Public Hearings Page 2 RELEVANT LINKS: LMC information memo, Taking the Mystery out of Findings of Fact. Minn. Stat. § 15.99. LMC information memo, The 60 -Day Rule: Minnesota's Automatic Approval Statute. D. Conclude the hearing After all evidence has been received and everyone has been given an opportunity to be heard, the public hearing should be concluded. The planning commission, board of appeals, or city council should then discuss the proposal. It should be remembered that for purposes of the open meeting law, a meeting is still being held and the discussions must be open to the public. E. Action The planning commission or board of appeals should make a recommendation to the city council on the application. If the hearing is before the council, the council should either deny or approve the application. The matter may also be continued for further consideration. IV. Public record and findings of fact The public record is being increasingly reviewed by the courts to determine whether the city's action involved a reasonable means to a legal end. The law provides that cities have considerable discretion in developing plans, setting standards, and deciding applications. The public record, as a whole, must demonstrate that the city acted reasonably in enforcing its plans, standards, and regulations. It does not matter that the city acted reasonably if it is unable to prove its actions through the public record. In reviewing the public record, courts look primarily to a city council's findings of fact. A city council must apply the facts to the law and find reasons upon which to base its decision. The reasons or rationale are referred to as findings of fact and need to be an adequate factual basis in the public record to support the council's decision. Inadequate findings may result in a reversal of the council's decision. V. 60 -Day rule Cities must remember that they have only 60 days to make most land use decisions including rezoning request, conditional use permits, and variances. The 60 -day period begins to run when a written request is received by the city. Failure to act within 60 days results in automatic approval of the application. A city may extend the 60 -day limit for an additional 60 days by giving the applicant written notice before the initial 60 -day period is over. The written notice must indicate the reason for the extension and the length of the extension. Additionally, applicants may agree to waive the time limits. Any such waiver should be in writing. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 3/8/2010 Public Hearings Page 3 RELEVANT LINKS: Jed Burkett 651.281.1247 jburkett @lmc.org League of Minnesota Cities. VI. Further assistance Contact the League's Loss Control Land Use Attorney for assistance. You can also learn more about land use issues in the land use section of the League's website. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 3/8/2010 Public Hearings Page 4 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item. 10a. Council Meeting: Prepared By: July 24, 2014 Brad Martens Topic: Action Required: Ordinance Regulating Public Sanitary Sewer Approval and Water within the City of Corcoran Summary: Over the past several months the City Council has reviewed several drafts of the ordinance required to regulate public sanitary sewer and water within the City of Corcoran. Most recently staff presented an updated ordinance for review at the July 10, 2014 meeting and asked for comments on the ordinance by July 16, 2014. Comments received have been incorporated into the final draft. Staff is fully aware that the proposed ordinance will need amendments in the future as unforeseen future conditions will require. It is strongly requested that the City Council approve the ordinance as presented and bring back as needed for future amendments. Financial /Budget: The ordinance outlines requirements for properties within the City to pay availability fees and connection fees for the use of the sanitary sewer and water system. These fees offset the expenditures needed to develop and maintain the system. Revenues and expenditures for the system will be separate from the general fund and not be a part of the property taxes paid to the City. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services We believe that service to the public is our reason for being, and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost - effective, and friendly manner. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that fiscal responsibility, and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Options: 1. Approve the Ordinance Regulating Public Sanitary Sewer and Water within the City of Corcoran. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Page 2 Recommendation: Approve the Ordinance Regulating Public Sanitary Sewer and Water within the City of Corcoran. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve the Ordinance Regulating Public Sanitary Sewer and Water within the City of Corcoran. Attachments: 1. Ordinance Regulating Public Sanitary Sewer and Water Within the City of Corcoran CITY OF CORCORAN ORDINANCE NO. 2014- AN ORDINANCE REGULATING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER AND WATER WITHIN THE CITY OF CORCORAN THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: Chapter XXX.010: PURPOSE Subdivision 1. Purpose. The City sanitary sewer and water supply systems represent significant public investments and their operation in an efficient and sanitary manner is essential to protect public health, safety and welfare, to safeguard municipal finances and to support development and economic vitality within the community. It is the purpose of this ordinance to protect the integrity, the financial stability and adequacy of the City sanitary sewer and water supply systems by regulating the construction, maintenance and use of those systems, and restricting the installation and use of private water supply wells and individual sewage treatment systems when necessary or appropriate. Priority for extending; service is new development and the existing downtown commercial district. It is not the intention of the City to extend service and require connection of existing residential or agricultural properties unless requested as referenced in this ordinance. Chapter XXX.015: DEFINITIONS Subdivision 1. Definitions. The following terms shall have the meanings given to them unless another meaning is clear from the context: 1.1 Account. A record of utility services used by each property and the periodic charges for those utility services. 1.2 Available (Access to Sewer/Water Line). A trunk or lateral sewer or water line is deemed available to a property when (i) that line is either abutting the property or may be accessed by the property by utility or road easement/ROW, and (ii) the City has included the property within a defined service area approved for immediate utility service. 1.3 City. The City of Corcoran, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. 1.4 City Utility System. Facilities used for providing public utility service owned or operated by City or agency thereof, including sewer, storm sewer and water service. 1.5 Commercial. Defined as non - residential and non - agricultural use, which is typically commercial, industrial, or retail; operations. 7/18/2014 1.6 Connection Charge. Connection charges are paid to the City by benefitting property owners to cover the City's costs of connection to and administration and operation of the City utility. Connection charges are set by the City Council. 1.7 Fee Schedule. A schedule of all utility rates and charges set by City ordinance. Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, 12 pt Formatted: Normal 1.8 Residential. Single and multi - family use. 1.9 SAC (Metropolitan Council Sewer Availability Charge). The Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) is a one -time fee by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services for each new connection to or increase in capacity demand on the Metropolitan Disposal System. The City may pass the SAC charge, along with possible local fees, to benefitting property owners. SAC charge units will be based on the assumed generation of 274 daily gallons of waste water flow per unit. Single family residential units will pay one SAC charge unit and other properties will pay a number of units based on estimated daily flow calculations (but in no case less than one unit). The City may periodically revise the SAC charge calculation and unit charge. 1.10 Trunk Line Availability Charges (TLAC). Trunk Line Availability Charges ( "TLAC ") are fees charged to all properties for which a water or sanitary sewer trunk line is available. Separate TLAC will be charged for each of water and sewer trunk lines. The TLAC are charged in recognition of the current benefit to properties for which a trunk line is available, regardless whether the property is connected to the trunk line (whether directly or via a lateral). The City will set and may periodically revise the TLAC. 1.11 Unimproved Land. Land that does not have certain basic services necessary to Formatted: Font: Bold, underline utilize it for other purposes. These include electricity, telephone, street access, or water available. 1.1472 Water and Sanitary Sewer Systems. Water and sanitary sewer transmission pipes, lines, fixtures, meters and all necessary equipment and appurtenances owned or operated by the City utility system for the purpose of providing water and sewer services for public or private use. Chapter XXX.020: UTILITY CONNECTION, PERMISSIVE OR MANDATORY Subdivision 1. Mandatory Connection. 1.1 As defined in Chapter XXX.010 Subdivision 1.2, all new residential and commercial construction to which utility service is available shall connect to the line at the time of construction. 1.2 When a trunk or lateral water or sewer line is available to an existing commercial property (with a structure), as defined in Chapter XXX.010 Subdivision 1.2, all such commercial properties shall connect to the line upon the earlier of (i) reconstruction (other than overlay or maintenance) of an adjacent roadway under which the line lies, or (ii) within one year following availability. Subdivision 2. Permissive Connection. 2.1 The City may extend a trunk or lateral sewer or water line to serve an existing residential neighborhood or commercial district upon petition by property owners within the neighborhood or district. The City may consider the following information in approving or denying the petition: comprehensive cost of the project; cost to individual properties; demonstrated need for the project; existing site conditions of the proposed project; geographic scope of the project area, and any other information the City deems relevant. 2.2 If as a result of a property owner petition, the City makes a water or sewer trunk or lateral line available to existing residential or commercial properties, as defined in Chapter XXX.010 Subdivision 1.2, the City shall have the discretion and authority to either require connection to the trunk or lateral line upon construction of the trunk or lateral line, or to defer connection of individual properties on a case -by -case basis. CHAPTER XXX.030: CHARGES, RATES AND BILLING Subdivision 1. Availability and Connection Charges. 1.1 Trunk Line Availability Charges (TLAC) shall be charged to and collected from benefitting properties property as follows: 1.1.1 New Construction. TLAC shall be charged and collected upon approval of the final plat for new construction. 1.1.2 Existing Construction. In the event service is extended to existing construction as defined in Chapter XXX.020 Subdivision 2.1, TLAC shall be charged to each benefitting, residential or commercial property when the trunk or lateral line is made available to the property. TLAC shall be collected within 30 days notice from the City or; at the discretion of the City, collection may be deferred and financed for a period not to exceed 20 years. In the event the City allows deferral of collection, the deferred charge shall bear interest at a rate 1% above the City's cost of borrowing in the year the deferral was approved. 1.1.3 Additional New Construction Without Platting. In the event of new construction on, greens— eunimproved land or as a result of teardown on existing platted Formatted: Highlight lots, TLAC shall be collected from each individual or entity requesting or receiving a connection to the City water system. Credit will be given for any prior TLAC paid on behalf of the platted lot. 1.2 Connection Charge. Connection charges shall be paid by all benefitting properties at the time of (a) building permit for new construction, or (b) issuance of connection permit for existing residential and commercial. 1.3 SAC. SAC shall be charged and collected at time of building permit issuance. 1.4 Deferrals. Property owners may apply to the City, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §435.193 -195 for a deferral of payment for sewer and water charges assessed to their property. The City shall have full discretion to consider and approve or deny the request for deferral. Interest shall be assessed upon and accrue against all deferred charges. Subdivision 2. Utility Usage Charges. 2.1 Charge for Water Usage. Utility customers shall be billed for water based on metered usage in per thousand gallon units. 2.2 Charge for Sanitary Sewer System Usage. Utility customers shall be billed for sanitary sewer based on metered usage of water in per thousand gallon units. 2.3 Administrative Base Charge. In addition to metered usage charges, utility customers shall be billed a minimum administrative base charge for water and sanitary sewer service. The administrative base charge shall be paid at the same time and in the same manner as metered usage payments. 2.4 Water Treatment Surcharge. Utility customers shall be billed for a water treatment surcharge in an amount set by the City Council and adopted by ordinance. This surcharge shall be paid at the same time and in the same manner as usage charge payments. The water treatment surcharge shall be used to offset the costs of water treatment performed by the City of Maple Grove. 2.5 Fee Schedule. A utility fee schedule shall be prepared annually by the City Administrator and presented to the City Council for approval and adoption in ordinance form. The charge schedule shall be comprehensive and list all utility charges, including incentive -based water conservation incentive charges. 2.6 Frequency of Charges. Utility customers shall be invoiced monthly for utility services. Utility customers shall pay utility invoices upon the terms established by the City and as stated in the invoice. The City may contract with third party vendors to perform billing services. 2.7 Designation of Billing Address. All bills and notices pertaining to water and sanitary sewer systems sent by the City shall be sent to the house or street number of the property. If an owner or agent desires that personal notice be sent to a different address, that person shall file an application therefore with the City. Any error or change in any address shall be promptly reported to the City. 2.8 Late Charges; Delinquent Bills. A late charge, in an amount established in ordinance, shall be charged if bills are not paid by the due date established in that bill. If a bill is not paid within 30 days of the date that it becomes due, it shall be deemed delinquent. When a bill becomes delinquent, the City shall notify the property owner, in writing, of the same. An additional late charge shall be added on each monthly calculation date upon which a delinquent bill, including any previous late charges, remains unpaid. 2.9 Assessing Delinquent Charges. The City maintains the authority to certify delinquent charges to the Hennepin County Auditor for collection with taxes and toef the City may elect to shut off water to property in certain cases where delinquencies are greater than 890 days. It shall be the practice of the City to certify delinquent payments annually, but this may be done on a more frequent basis at the discretion of the City Council. Before certification for collection, or shut off,- the City shall notify the property owner of the date and time of the meeting to address the delinquency. The City Council shall have final authority over actions related to delinquent payments or shut off for a property. 2.10 Errors in Billing. The City Administrator shall be authorized to make adjustments in water charges when, in the opinion of the City Administrator, the amount billed to a utility customer was erroneous due to an inaccurate or defective meter, or due to other mistake. CHAPTER XXX.040 CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OWNERSHIP Subdivision 1. Authority to Conduct Services 1.1 Permit Required for Connection Work. No person shall open, connect with, use, alter, or disturb any public water line or public sewer line or appurtenance thereof without first obtaining a written permit from the City pursuant to this section. 1.2 Persons Authorized to Work on City Water and Sewer System. Only a duly authorized employee of the City or City contractors, are permitted to do any work on City water lines, or water meters connected to the City water system, . 1.3 Damaging or Tampering Prohibited. No person shall maliciously, willfully, or negligently break, damage, destroy, uncover, deface, or tamper with any structure, appurtenance, or equipment which is part of the municipal water line infrastructure. 1.4 Inspections. The Building Inspector and any other duly authorized City employee, bearing proper credentials and identification, shall be permitted to enter upon all properties for the purposes of inspection, observation, measurement, sampling, and testing in accordance with the provisions of this section. Subdivision 2. Water System. 2.1 Water Quality. The City purchases all utility system water from the City of Maple Grove, which has the authority to establish and control water quality standards as well as ordinances and rules applicable to the preservation and use of the water it supplies to the City. The use and supply of water furnished by Maple Grove shall at all times be governed by the applicable Maple Grove ordinances and rules in effect for the preservation, use and protection of its water supply. The City hereby adopts the applicable City of Maple Grove preservation, use and protection ordinances and rules by reference, and shall enforce said ordinances and rules hereunder. The City reserves the right to adopt additional ordinances and rules affecting the preservation, use and protection of its utility system water. 2.2 Maintenance and Repair of Water Mains. The City shall be responsible for maintenance and repair of the water line infrastructure including the water shutoff valve out to the lateral connection. Maintenance and repair of water lines located on private property from the water shutoff valve to the home is the responsibility of the property owner. If a property owner fails to make the necessary repairs to the water line within 30 days after the owner is notified to do so by the City, in writing, the City may cause the repairs to be completed and charged to the property owner for all costs associated with the repair. In cases where an emergency is declared, the City shall cause repairs the water system to be made immediately, which may include turning off the water to the property immediately. 2.3 Water Meters. 2.3.1 Water Meter Required. Exeept for °..roguish. ent offr° °, nNo person except authorized City employees shall use water from the City water supply system or permit water to be drawn therefrom, unless the water is metered by passing through a meter supplied or approved by the City. 2.3.2 Tampering Prohibited. No person shall connect, disconnect, disassemble, alter, cause to be altered, tamper, obstruct, or interfere with any City water meter, unless authorized by the City. 2.3.3 Bypassing Meters or Taking Water. No person shall bypass or tamper with any water meter for any reason. 2.3.4 Ownership of Meters. Water meters shall be and remain the property of the City. Meters may be removed, replaced, or changed by the City whenever the City deems it necessary. 2.3.5 City Access to Read, Repair, and Replace Meters, Conduct Inspections. Authorized City employees shall have access at reasonable hours of the day to all parts of every building and premises connected with the City water supply system to read, repair, and replace meters and conduct inspections. Before entering private property to do so, the City shall solicit the written consent of the property owner. If a property owner refuses to give consent or fails to respond, the City may pursue legal options to enter the property. 2.3.6 Cost of Inspection. City staff will set and impose a cost for inspecting a meter that is reported to be malfunctioning or defective. This cost shall be reimbursed to the property owner should the meter require replacement or repair. 2.3.7 Cost of Repair. The City shall be responsible for the repair and replacement of water meters unless a meter is damaged by a property owner intentionally or the damage is due to carelessness on the part of the property owner. In such instances, the property owner shall be responsible for the costs of repair and/or replacement. 2.3.8 Meter Accuracy. The City may charge a fee as established annually for investigating and testing meter accuracy. If the meter is determined to be faulty, the charge will be refunded. 2.4 Water System Mapping. The City shall maintain a comprehensive water system map detailing the following information: The number and line locations, the type and diameter of pipe, and the location of access points. The City shall maintain a program of regular inspection and maintenance performed on its water system lines. The City shall also maintain a program for lift station inspection and maintenance. 2.5 Water Use Conservation. The City reserves the right to impose water use restrictions pursuant to conservation efforts as required by regulatory authorities. The City may adopt administrative policies and procedures related to and regulating water conservation practices. 2.6 Fire Hydrants. Fire hydrants located within the limits of the City of Corcoran shall be the property of the City. Only persons authorized by the City shall be allowed to open and operate any fire hydrant in the City for any purpose. Temporary access to hydrants may be granted by the City to previously unauthorized persons via a permit issued by the City. Payment for water used, except for that used in firefighting, shall be made in accordance with adopted ordinance. 2.7 City Not Liable for Damages Resulting from Interruption of Service. The City shall not be liable for any damages which result from any stoppage or slowing of the supply or flow of water as a result of breaks in mains, service pipes, fixtures, or by reason of obstruction or the breakdown of machinery. The City shall also not be liable for any damages which result from such stoppage or slowing that is the result of any necessary repair, or any other interruption in service. 2.8 Cross Connections Prohibited. No City water pipe shall be connected with any pump, well, or tank that is connected with any other source of water supply. When such a connection is found, the City shall notify the owner of the property on which the connection is found and order that the cross connection be disconnected. If this is not accomplished immediately, the water supply to the property may be turned off at the direction of the City Council. Before any new connection to the water system is permitted, the City shall ascertain that no cross - connection will exist when the connection is made. 2.9 Abandoned Services. 2.9.1 Disconnection Required. All service installations connected to the water system that have been abandoned or have become useless for further service shall be disconnected at the main by the City. All pipe and appurtenances removed shall be the property of the City. 2.9.2 Change to New Water Service. When a new_primaa structure is erected on the site of an old structure, and it is desired to increase or alter the old water service, no connections with the City mains shall be permitted until all the old service is removed and the main plugged. If there is an existing water service to an accessory Formatted: Not Highlight structureaflot °r'^uilding an the site, it may remain in use. 2.10 Irrigation Systems. All irrigation systems connected to the municipal system shall be installed per plumbing code and have a rain detection device so as to prevent irrigation during rain events. 2.11 Emergency Water Restrictions. The authorized staff to act in a water emergency include the Mayor, Engineer, Public Works Superintendent and Administrator. When any two of the authorized staff determine pressure or quantities are (or may become) inadequate, a water emergency may be declared by posted notice and typical City communication methods (website, etc.). 2.11.1 Council will review the water emergency restrictions at the next regular Council meeting and confirm or remove the restriction. Subdivision 3. Sewer System. 3.1 Maintenance and Repair of Sewer System. The property owner shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing the sanitary sewer line from the structure to the connection with the public sewer main. The City shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing the remainder of the sanitary sewer infrastructure. If a property owner fails to make the necessary repairs to the sewer line infrastructure within 30 days after the owner is notified to do so by the City, in writing, the City may cause the repairs to be completed and charged to the property owner for all costs associated with the repair. In cases where an emergency is declared, the City shall cause repairs to the sewer system to be made immediately. 3.2 Sewer Mapping. The City shall maintain a comprehensive sanitary sewer system map detailing the following information: The number and location of manholes, the number and location of service connections, line locations, the type and diameter of pipe, and the location of lift stations. The City shall maintain a program of regular inspection and maintenance performed on sanitary sewer lines. The City shall also maintain a program for lift station inspection and maintenance. 3.3 Damaging or Tampering Prohibited. No person shall maliciously, willfully, or negligently break, damage, destroy, uncover, deface, or tamper with any structure, appurtenance, or equipment which is part of the sanitary sewer system. 3.4 Inspections. Every person owning real estate that discharges into the City sanitary sewer system shall allow Tthe Building Inspector- an4-any etieF duly authorized City employee, designated representative of the City, or a licensed plumber bearing proper credentials and identification, shall be p°Fmifte' to enter upon all pr -epeF esthe rp opert X for the purposes of inspection, observation, measurement, sampling, and testing in accordance with the provisions of this section. This includes to confirm that there is no sump pump or other prohibited discharge into the sanitary sewer system. Any person refusing to allow their property to be inspected shall immediately become subject to a surcharge in an amount established by the fee schedule. Any property found to be discharging storm water into the sanitary sewer system, either directly or indirectly shall make the necessary changes and furnish proof of the changes to the City within six months of the inspection. A surcharge in an amount established by the fee schedule shall be imposed on the property owner's sanitary sewer utility bill for properties in violation of this ordinance and continue until the property is found to be in compliance. 3.4.1 If a person does not wish to allow the Citv to enter a buildine to conduct the required activity, he or she may retain a licensed plumber to conduct the activity. The private inspector must have credentials that are acceptable to the City. The private inspector shall provide the City with the relevant samples, tests, reports, drawings, photos, or any other information that is being requested. 3.5 City Not Liable for Damages Resulting Interruption of Service. The City shall not be liable for any damages which result from the backup of sewer lines as a result of breaks in mains, service pipes, fixtures, or by reason of obstruction or the breakdown of machinery. The City shall also not be liable for any damages which result from such stoppage or slowing or backup that is the result of any necessary repair, or any other interruption in service. 3.6 Discharge to Public Sewer. No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged any prohibited waste discharges as defined in the Metropolitan Council's waste discharge rules (WDR), February 2013 or latest version. This includes harmful wastes, whether liquid, solid, or gas, capable of causing obstruction to the flow in the sewer system, damage, or hazard to sewer structures, equipment, or personnel. No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged any storm water, surface water, groundwater, or runoff, subsurface drainage, cooling water, or industrial process waters to any City sanitary sewer, or otherwise interfere with the proper operation of the City sewer system. This includes sump discharges. 3.6.1 Industrial and Commercial Strength. Industrial users discharging wastewater into public sewers shall apply for an industrial discharge permit according to the WDR (February 2013 or latest version),unless MCES determines that the wastewater has an insignificant impact on public sewers. 3.7 Abandoned Services. 3.7.1 Disconnection Required. All service installations connected to the sanitary sewer system that have been abandoned or have become useless for further service shall be disconnected at the main by the City. All pipe and appurtenances removed shall be the property of the City. 3.7.2 Change to New Sanitary Sewer Service. When a new structure is erected on the site of an old structure, and it is desired to increase or alter the old sanitary sewer, no connections with the City mains shall be permitted until all the old service is removed and the main plugged. CHAPTER XXX.050 ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT Subdivision 1. 1.1 Duties, Responsibilities, and Authority of City Administrator. The City Administrator shall be responsible for the implementation of this section and shall report annually to the City Council, as a part of the annual City budget process. At that time, the City Administrator shall inform the City Council of the status of the condition of the infrastructure, replacement requirements, and the financial condition and performance of the utility enterprise fund. Subdivision 2. Penalties. 2.1 Any person who violates any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Each day that any violation is continued shall constitute a separate offense. Subdivision 3. Liability for Damages. 3.1 A person who violates any of the provisions of this ordinance is liable to the City for any expense, loss, or damage incurred by the City by reason of such violation. Subdivision 4. DelinquentAccounts. Delinquent accounts shall be subject to the following procedures: 4.1 Penalties. A late payment penalty of ten percent shall be assessed on all accounts with a past due balance. 10 4.2 Shut -off for non - payment. Water shall not be shut -off until notice and an opportunity for a hearing before the city council has been provided to the occupant and owner of the premises involved. 4.2.1 If any bill is not paid by 30 days after the due date listed on the bill, the city shall send a letter by first class mail demanding payment within 30 days of the date of the letter. 4.2.2 If any bill is not paid by 60 days after the due date listed on the bill, the city shall send a second letter by first class mail stating that if payment is not made within 20 days of the date of the letter, water service to the premises will be shut -off for nonpayment. 4.2.3 The first and second letters shall contain the title, address and telephone number of the official in charge of billing. 4.2.4 The city clerk shall have the authority to adjust the customer's bill or enter into a mutually agreeable payment plan. 4.2.5 The letters shall also state that any occupant or owner has the right to a hearing before the water service is shut -off. The owner or occupant may be represented in person and by counsel or any other person of owner's choosing. The owner or occupant may present orally or in writing their complaint to the city council. 4.2.6 If an occupant or owner requests a hearing, the water shall not be shut -off until the hearing process is complete. 4.2.7 If a customer fails to pay a bill when due and fails to request a hearing under this part, service will be shut -off at the time specified in the notice. Any residential property for which water service has been terminated under this subdivision shall be deemed uninhabitable under City code. 4.3 Certification for collection with taxes. 4.3.1 Unpaid charges on water, sewer, and other utility services shall not be certified to the county auditor until notice for a hearing has been provided to the owner of the premises involved. The notice shall be sent by first class mail and shall state that if payment is not made by September 25, the entire amount unpaid plus a penalty of ten percent will be certified to the county auditor for collection as other taxes are collected. The notice shall also state that the occupant may, before such certification date, attend or schedule a hearing on the matter to object to certification of unpaid utility charges. 4.3.2 The owner of the property shall have the option of paying the balance due on the account by September 25. After this date, the certified roll will be finalized. After the date the certified roll is finalized, payments will still be accepted but will include the ten percent penalty. 11 Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its publication and passage. ADOPTED by the City Council on this 10th day of July, 2014. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Guenther, Ken Cossette, Tom Asleson, Rich Lynch, Diane Thomas, Ron ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke, City Clerk 12 Guenther, Ken Cossette, Tom Asleson, Rich Lynch, Diane Thomas, Ron Ken Guenther, Mayor STAFF REPORT Agenda Item. 11 a. Council Meeting: July 24, 2014 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Action Required: Resolution 2014 -44 Awarding the Sale of Direction General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B Summary: At the July 10, 2014 City Council meeting, a resolution was approved to offer bonds for sale for the construction of water and sewer improvements related to the Ravinia development as well as costs related to the Public Works facility. Proposals will be opened on the morning of the July 24th meeting and presented to the City Council for approval at that meeting. An updated resolution with actual figures will be presented to the City Council at that time. As part of the bond sale process, staff participated in a bond rating call and is pleased to inform the City Council that bond rating for the City has been upgraded by Moody's Investors Service from an A2 to an Al. Staff at Moody's stated the following about the City of Corcoran: • Tax base is going in the right direction; income is above average; demand is there; see steady growth ahead. • Reserves are getting nominally stronger however the value (meaning the amount of reserves) is on the lower end. • See a good five year trend which speaks to the conservative budgeting and prudent financial management. • More upward pressure than not, more credit positives than negatives since last bond rating in 2012. • Continued strong financial management could lead to an AA rating in three to five years. The improved rating will reduce the costs of borrowing for the City. Staff will provide some tangible information regarding this at the meeting when costs of issuance are known. The next step in the process is to approve the resolution and award the sale of bonds. Staff as well as Northland Securities will be available to answer any questions. Financial /Budget: The total issuance is $3,140,000 • Water and sewer infrastructure: $2,800,000* • Public Works facility: $250,000 • Issuance /Underwriting /Rounding: $90,000 Page 2 *Estimated costs are $2,520,000; staff is issuing debt for $2,800,000 to allow for any possible alterations /change proposals which may be required to complete the project. Bonds will be paid over 20 years out of the water and sewer fund. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being, and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost - effective, and friendly manner. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We believe that fiscal responsibility, and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Options: 1. Approve Resolution 2014 -44 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B. 2. Decline the sale. Recommendation: Approve Resolution 2014 -44 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B Council Action: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 2014 -44 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B Attachments: 1. Moody's Investor Service Report 2. Resolution 2014 -44 Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE New Issue: Moody's upgrades City of Corcoran, MN's GO to Al Global Credit Research -17 Jul 2014 Assigns Al to $3.1M GO Bonds Ser. 2014B CORCORAN (CITY OF) MN Cities (including Towns, Villages and Townships) MN Moody's Rating ISSUE RATING General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B Al Sale Amount Expected Sale Date Rating Description Moody's Outlook NOO Opinion $3,140,000 07/24/14 General Obligation NEW YORK, July 17, 2014 -- Moody's Investors Service upgrades to Al from A2 the underlying rating for the City of Corcoran (MN). Concurrently, we assign an Al to the city's $3.1 million General Obligation (GO) Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B. While the intended repayment source for the Series 2014B bonds is net revenues of the city's water and sewer utility systems, debt service on this series and all the city's GO debt is ultimately secured by the city's GO unlimited tax (GOULT) pledge which benefits from a dedicated property tax levy not limited by rate or amount. Proceeds from the Series 2014B bonds will finance the construction of water and sewer improvements within the City, including improvements for a public works building. Post -sale, the city will have $8.6 million in GO debt outstanding. SUMMARY RATINGS RATIONALE The Al rating reflects the city's modestly sized tax base with high income levels favorably located near the Twin Cities employment center; recently improved, relatively high but nominally modest reserve levels; above average debt levels with some future borrowing plans; and some uncertainty surrounding the expansion of water and sewer utilities. STRENGTHS - Strong full value per capita and median family income levels - Recent valuation growth expected to continue in the near term CHALLENGES - Nominally small General Fund reserve balances - Debt burden and fixed costs projected to increase over the medium term - Some uncertainty related to expansion of water and sewer utility systems DETAILED CREDIT DISCUSSION MODESTLY SIZED TAX BASE WITH ABOVE AVERAGE INCOME INDICES NEAR THE TWIN CITIES The city's modestly sized $711 million tax base will remain stable over the next three to five years given its proximity to the Twin Cities employment base and above average income levels. The city is located in Hennepin County (Aaa stable) approximately 20 miles west of downtown Minneapolis (Aa1 stable). The city serves primarily as a bedroom community for the metropolitan area with residential homestead properties making up 70% of valuations. During the recession, the city saw a steep decline in valuations. Indicated market values declined by 50% from over $1 billion to as low as $650 million in 2012. Since then, valuation declines have stabilized and the economic market value grew to $711 million as of 2014. Preliminary estimates from the county point to 10% increase in valuations which is reflective of improvements in area housing prices. There has been some recent building activity with seven new homes constructed over the last 12 months. Notably, the average value of the homes has been in excess of $500,000. However, city residents currently utilize well and septic systems for water and sewer needs, which is a limiting factor for development. As a result, the city has chosen to invest in infrastructure to provide water and sewer utility services for its commercial district and a planned residential area. The city currently has a development agreement with a developer to build 426 residential properties on approximately 270 acres of land in the southeastern portion of the city. Should development proceed as projected, the city, whose population has remained around 5,500 residents since the 2000 census, could see population growth over the medium term. Unemployment in the county was 4% as of May 2014, below the state (4.2 %) and the nation (6.1 %) over the same period. Residential income levels are well above national medians with median family income at 162% of the nation, according to 2008 -2012 American Community Survey 5 -year estimates. CONSECUTIVE SURPLUSES HAVE LEAD TO IMPROVED RESERVE AND LIQUIDITY POSITION The city's financial operations are expected to remain satisfactory over the next three to five years given solid reserve levels and recently implemented financial policies. The city saw surpluses in fiscals 2012 and 2013 which increased available reserves from a modest $472,000 or 15% of revenues to a solid $961,000 or 28% of revenues. The city closed fiscal 2013 with a $290,000 operating surplus which is mostly attributable to conservative expenditure assumptions. Year to date results for fiscal 2014 point to balanced operations. The city adopted a policy to maintain at least 35% of reserves as unrestricted. Approximately $271,000 of the city's total fund balance is in the form of a receivable from internal capital funds. The city is planning to levy approximately $20,000 per year to repay this loan from the General Fund which should increase the available General Fund reserves and cash position over time. The city is primarily property tax funded which made up 78% of operating revenues in 2013. WI_ \ON 10:110 :: /7_\X69[6P►[*]MUTITAN :1:7_\,I9: A: 11: 101 11IN III 1I:9YK *li1191W ;1 *9:01tiIli]:►_\ 44:11'0[e]: While the city's General Fund operations have been stable, there is some uncertainty surrounding the city's planned expansion of its water and sewer utilities. The city plans to build infrastructure and provide water and sewer utility distribution services to its business district and new residential developments. The initial infrastructure will be funded with approximately $1.6 million in reserves from a now decertified TIF fund, in addition to future special assessments. While this undertaking may facilitate development, it may also pose some operating risks. The city will purchase its water from neighboring Maple Grove (Aaa stable) and the Metropolitan Council ((Minn -St. Paul Area) Aaa stable) will provide sewer treatment. Based on current estimates, operating the utilities will cost between $800,000 and $1 million inclusive of debt service over the next five years. The city has instituted a number of policies to enhance its financial security in the event of protracted delays in development or unforeseen cost increases. The city has received $1.2 million from a developer which it deposited in its utility funds as an operating reserve for the systems. Additionally, the city has instituted a trunk line availability charge which requires a cash payment from a developer at the time of platting. These upfront payments are intended to serve as a buffer as the system and number of users begins to grow and operations become self sustaining. Based on the projected costs and contingencies in place, we believe the city has taken sufficient measures to mitigate some of the risks associated with this undertaking. However, cost overruns or operational challenges that pressure the city's financial operations will have an impact on future credit quality. ABOVE AVERAGE DEBT BURDEN WITH FUTURE BORROWING PLANNED The city's debt burden is expected to remain above average over the next three to five years given its plans to borrow for infrastructure improvements. The city's direct debt burdens of 1.2% of full value and 2.3 times operating revenues are both above average compared to state and national levels. The city's principal amortization is below average with 40% of the city's debt amortized within 10 years. At the end of fiscal 2013, debt service paid from operating funds comprised a manageable 9.2% of operating expenditures. The city's current outstanding debt is primarily repaid by property taxes, however, it is the city's expectation that the current offering will be repaid with water and sewer revenues. The city's annual debt service costs will increase from approximately $300,000 per year over the last three years to approximately $600,000 or approximately 20% of operating expenditures over the next three to five years. The city also plans to borrow approximately $700,000 in 2015, $1.4 million in 2015, and $2.5 million in 2018. Despite these planned borrowings and increased debt service costs, we expect the city's debt position to remain manageable as long as non -levy support is generated as planned. All of the city's outstanding debt is fixed rate, and the city is not a party to any interest rate swap agreements. The city participates in two multiple - employer cost - sharing plans administered by the state, the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and Public Employees Police and Fire Fund ( PEPFF). Moody's adjusted net pension liability (ANPL) for the city, under our methodology for adjusting reported pension data, is $4.8 million, or a modest 0.7 times operating revenues (General Fund and Debt Service Funds) and 1.3% of full value. In 2013, the city contributed a total of $123,000, equal to a modest 3% of operating revenues. Moody's ANPL reflects certain adjustments we make to improve the comparability of reported pension liabilities. The adjustments are not intended to replace the city's reported liability information, but to improve comparability with other rated entities. We determined the city's share of liability for GERF and PEPFF in proportion to its contributions to the plans. WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING - UP - Material increases in General Fund reserves - Sustained growth of the economy and tax base WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING - DOWN - Declines in General Fund financial reserves - Operational challenges or cost overruns related to water and sewer system expansion - Multi -year valuation declines KEY STATISTICS 2014 Full value: $711 million 2014 Estimated full value per capita: $128,928 2008 -2012 Median family income (as a % of US): 162% Fiscal 2013 Available Operating Fund Balance: 25.3% of revenues Fiscal 2008 to Fiscal 2013 Change in Available Operating Fund Balance as a % of revenues: 9.3% Fiscal 2013 Operating Fund Cash Balance: 23.9% of revenues Fiscal 2008 to Fiscal 2013 Change in Operating Fund Cash Balance as a % of revenues: 11.4% Fiscal 2008 to Fiscal 2013 Average Operating Revenues / Operating Expenditures: 1.04 times Institutional Framework: Aa Net Direct Debt / Full Value: 1.2% Net Direct Debt / Operating Revenues: 2.3 times 3 -year average of Moody's ANPL / Full Value: 0.7% 3 -year average of Moody's ANPL / Operating Revenues: 1.3 times RATING METHODOLOGY The principal methodology used in this rating was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in January 2014. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer /entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer /entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Analysts Chandra Ghosal Lead Analyst Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Soo Yun Chun Additional Contact Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Contacts Journalists: (212) 553 -0376 Research Clients: (212) 553 -1653 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 USA MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE © 2014 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and /or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S "). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ( "MIS ") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT -LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ( "MOODY'S PUBLICATION ") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT -LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL -BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third -party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody's Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. MIS, a wholly -owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ( "MCO "), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5 %, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy." For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and /or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761 G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761 G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for "retail clients" to make any investment decision based on MOODY'S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. City of Corcoran July 24, 2014 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in said City on Thursday, July 24, 2014, commencing at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: The Mayor announced that the next order of business was consideration of the proposals which had been received for the purchase of the City's $ Series 2014B. General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, The City Administrator presented a tabulation of the proposals that had been received in the manner specified in the Notice of Sale for the Bonds. The proposals are attached hereto as EXHIBIT A. After due consideration of the proposals, Member then introduced the following written resolution, the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its adoption: 4464860 NMI CR100 -16 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $ GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2014B; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Sale of Bonds. 1.01. Authorization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 and Chapter 475, as amended (together, the "Act "), the City is authorized to issue obligations in order to undertake the construction of various water and sewer improvements within the City and to fund certain costs of improvements to the public works building within the City (the "Project "). The City has previously authorized the issuance of its General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B (the "Bonds ") by a Resolution adopted on July 10, 2014. 1.02. Award to the Purchaser and Interest Rates. The proposal of (the "Purchaser ") to purchase the Bonds of the City is found and determined to be a reasonable offer and is accepted, the proposal being to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ (par amount of $ , plus original issue premium of $ , less underwriter's discount of $), for Bonds bearing interest as follows: Year Interest Rate Year Interest Rate 2016 % 2026 % 2017 2027 2018 2028 2019 2029 2020 2030 2021 2031 2022 2032 2023 2033 2024 2034 2025 2035 True interest cost: % 1.03. Purchase Contract. Any original issue premium and any rounding amount shall be credited to the Debt Service Fund hereinafter created, or deposited in the Construction Fund hereinafter created, as determined by the City Administrator in consultation with the City's municipal advisor. The City Administrator is directed to retain the good faith check of the Purchaser, pending completion of the sale of the Bonds, and to return the good faith checks of the unsuccessful proposers. The Mayor and City Administrator are directed to execute a contract with the Purchaser on behalf of the City. 1.04. Terms and Principal Amounts of the Bonds. The City will forthwith issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to the Act in the total principal amount of $ , originally dated August 1, 2014, 4464860 NMI CR100 -16 2 in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, numbered No. R -1, upward, bearing interest as above set forth, and maturing serially on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Year Amount 2016 $ 2026 $ 2017 2027 2018 2028 2019 2029 2020 2030 2021 2031 2022 2032 2023 2033 2024 2034 2025 2035 1.05. Optional Redemption. The City may elect on February 1, 2022, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2023. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC (as defined in Section 7 hereof) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. [ 1.06. Term Bonds. To be completed if Term Bonds are requested by the Purchaser.] Section 2. Registration and Payment. 2.01. Registered Form. The Bonds will be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 2.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond will be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first interest payment date, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the Bonds will be payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 2015, to the registered owners of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not that day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City will appoint a bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating agent and paying agent (the "Registrar "). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto are as follows: (a) Re ig ster. The Registrar must keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar provides for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. 4464860 NMI CR100 -16 (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of a Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until that interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. When Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar will authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. Bonds surrendered upon transfer or exchange will be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When a Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the Bond until the Registrar is satisfied that the endorsement on the Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar will incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name a Bond is registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of the Bond, whether the Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on the Bond and for all other purposes, and payments so made to a registered owner or upon the owner's order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. The Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof for a transfer or exchange of Bonds sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. If a Bond becomes mutilated or is destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar will deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that the Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it and as provided by law, in which both the City and the Registrar must be named as obligees. Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar will be cancelled by the Registrar and evidence of such cancellation must be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it is not necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Redemption. In the event any of the Bonds are called for redemption, notice thereof identifying the Bonds to be redeemed will be given by the Registrar by mailing a copy of 4464860 MNI CR100 -16 4 the redemption notice by first class mail (postage prepaid) to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books kept by the Registrar and by publishing the notice if required by law. Failure to give notice by publication or by mail to registered owners, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of Bonds. Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided that the funds for the redemption are on deposit with the place of payment at that time. 2.04. Appointment of Initial Re_isg tray. The City appoints Northland Trust Services, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with the Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, the resulting corporation is authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar upon 30 days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar must deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and must deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Administrator must transmit to the Registrar moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.05. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds will be prepared under the direction of the City Administrator and executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator, provided that those signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be such officer before the delivery of a Bond, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, a Bond will not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on the Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on a Bond is conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Administrator will deliver the same to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser is not obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.06. Temporary Bonds. The City may elect to deliver in lieu of printed definitive Bonds one or more typewritten temporary Bonds in substantially the form set forth in EXHIBIT B attached hereto with such changes as may be necessary to reflect more than one maturity in a single temporary bond. Upon the execution and delivery of definitive Bonds the temporary Bonds will be exchanged therefor and cancelled. Section 3. Form of Bond. 3.01. Execution of Bonds. The Bonds will be printed or typewritten in substantially the form attached hereto as EXHIBIT B. 3.02. Approving Legal Opinion. The City Administrator will obtain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, which will be complete except as to dating thereof and will cause the opinion to be printed on or accompany each Bond. 4464860 NMI CR100 -16 Section 4. Payment; Security; Pledges and Covenants. 4.01. Debt Service Fund. (a) The City will continue to operate its Utility Fund to which will be credited all gross revenues of the water and sewer system and out of which will be paid all normal and reasonable expenses of current operations of the water and sewer system. Any balances therein are deemed "Net Revenues" and will be transferred, from time to time, to a General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B Debt Service Fund (the "Debt Service Fund ") hereby created, which fund will be used only to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds and any other bonds similarly authorized. There will always be retained in the Debt Service Fund a sufficient amount to pay principal of and interest on all the Bonds, and the City Administrator must report any current or anticipated deficiency in the Debt Service Fund to the City Council. There is appropriated to the Debt Service Fund (i) capitalized interest financed from Bond proceeds, if any; (ii) any amount over the minimum purchase price of the Bonds paid by the Purchaser, to the extent designated for deposit in the Debt Service Fund in accordance with Section 1.03; and (iii) the accrued interest paid by the Purchaser upon closing and delivery of the Bonds, if any. 4.02. Construction Fund. The proceeds of the Bonds, less the appropriations made in Section 4.01, together with any other funds appropriated during the construction of the Project financed by the Bonds, will be deposited in a separate construction fund (the "Construction Fund ") maintained by the City to be used solely to defray expenses of the Project and the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds prior to the completion and payment of all costs of the Project. When the Project is completed and the cost thereof paid, the Construction Fund is to be closed and any balance therein is to be deposited in the Debt Service Fund. 4.03. City Covenants. The City Council covenants and agrees with the holders of the Bonds that so long as any of the Bonds remain outstanding and unpaid, they will keep and enforce the following covenants and agreements: (a) The City will continue to maintain and efficiently operate the water and sewer system as public utilities and conveniences free from competition of other like municipal utilities and will cause all revenues therefrom to be deposited in bank accounts and credited to the water and sewer system accounts as hereinabove provided, and will make no expenditures from those accounts except for a duly authorized purpose and in accordance with this resolution. (b) The City will also maintain the Debt Service Fund as a separate account in the Utility Fund and will cause money to be credited thereto from time to time, out of net revenues from the water and sewer system in sums sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. (c) The City will keep and maintain proper and adequate books of records and accounts separate from all other records of the City in which will be complete and correct entries as to all transactions relating to the water and sewer system and which will be open to inspection and copying by any bondholder, or the bondholder's agent or attorney, at any reasonable time, and it will furnish certified transcripts therefrom upon request and upon payment of a reasonable fee therefor, and said account will be audited at least annually by a qualified public accountant and statements of such audit and report will be furnished to all bondholders upon request. (d) The City Council will cause persons handling revenues of the water and sewer system to be bonded in reasonable amounts for the protection of the City and the bondholders and will cause the funds collected on account of the operations of the water and sewer system to be deposited in a bank whose deposits are guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Law. 4464860 MNI CR100 -16 6 (e) The Council will keep the water and sewer system insured at all times against loss by fire, tornado and other risks customarily insured against with an insurer or insurers in good standing, in such amounts as are customary for like plants, to protect the holders, from time to time, of the Bonds and the City from any loss due to any such casualty and will apply the proceeds of such insurance to make good any such loss. (f) The City and each and all of its officers will punctually perform all duties with reference to the water and sewer system as required by law. (g) The City will impose and collect charges of the nature authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 at the times and in the amounts required to produce, net revenues adequate to pay all principal and interest when due on the Bonds and to create and maintain such reserves securing said payments as may be provided in this resolution. (h) The City Council will levy general ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City, when required to meet any deficiency in net revenues. 4.04. Net Revenue Pledge. It is hereby determined that the estimated collection of Net Revenues from the water system and sewer system for the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds will produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet, when due, the principal and interest payments on the Bonds and that no tax levy is needed at this time. 4.05. Certificate of County Auditor /Treasurer as to Registration. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor /Treasurer of Hennepin County, Minnesota, and to obtain the certificate required by Section 475.63 of the Act. Section 5. Authentication of Transcript. 5.01. City Proceedings and Records. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and fixrnish to the Purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other certificates, affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in their custody and under their control, relating to the validity and marketability of the Bonds, and such instruments, including any heretofore furnished, will be deemed representations of the City as to the facts stated therein. 5.02. Certification as to Official Statement. The Mayor and Administrator of the City are authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the Official Statement prepared and circulated in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Official Statement is a complete and accurate representation of the facts and representations made therein as of the date of the Official Statement. 5.03. Other Certificates. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to furnish to the Purchaser at the closing such certificates as are required as a condition of sale. Unless litigation shall have been commenced and be pending questioning the Bonds or the organization of the City or incumbency of its officers, at the closing the Mayor and the City Administrator shall also execute and deliver to the Purchaser a suitable certificate as to absence of material litigation, and the Administrator shall also execute and deliver a certificate as to payment for and delivery of the Bonds. 5.04. Payment of Costs of Issuance. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount 4464860 NMI CR100 -16 7 of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Northland Trust Services, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's municipal advisor, Northland Securities, Inc. Section 6. Tax Covenant. 6.01. Tax - Exempt Bonds. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code "), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the Bonds. 6.02. No Rebate Required. (a) The City will comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the Bonds under Section 103 of the Code, including without limitation requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States. (b) For purposes of qualifying for the small- issuer exception to the federal arbitrage rebate requirements, the City finds, determines and declares that the aggregate face amount of all tax - exempt bonds (other than private activity bonds) issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000, within the meaning of Section 148(f)(4)(D) of the Code. 6.03. Not Private Activity Bonds. The City further covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to cause or permit them or any of them to be used, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 6.04. Qualified Tax - Exempt Obligations. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the Code; (b) the City designates the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax - exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds which are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2014 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2014 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. 6.05. Procedural Requirements. The City will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. Section 7. Book -Entry System; Limited Obligation of City. 4464860 NMI CR100 -16 8 7.01. DTC. The Bonds will be initially issued in the form of a separate single typewritten or printed fully registered Bond for each of the maturities set forth in Section 1.04 hereof. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of each Bond will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns ( "DTC "). Except as provided in this section, all of the outstanding Bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. 7.02. Participants. With respect to Bonds registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent will have no responsibility or obligation to any broker dealers, banks and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository (the "Participants ") or to any other person on behalf of which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds, including but not limited to any responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any Participant or any other person (other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown by the registration books kept by the Registrar), of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of Bonds, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar as the holder and absolute owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal, premium and interest with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bond, and for all other purposes. The Paying Agent will pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or on the order of the respective registered owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, and all such payments will be valid and effectual to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, will receive a certificated Bond evidencing the obligation of this resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the City Administrator of a written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the words "Cede & Co." will refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt of such a notice, the City Administrator will promptly deliver a copy of the same to the Registrar and Paying Agent. 7.03. Representation Letter. The City has heretofore executed and delivered to DTC a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations (the "Representation Letter ") which shall govern payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and notices with respect to the Bonds. Any Paying Agent or Registrar subsequently appointed by the City with respect to the Bonds will agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the City in the Representation Letter with respect to the Registrar and Paying Agent, respectively, to be complied with at all times. 7.04. Transfers Outside Book -Entry System. In the event the City, by resolution of the City Council, determines that it is in the best interests of the persons having beneficial interests in the Bonds that they be able to obtain Bond certificate, the City will notify DTC, whereupon DTC will notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of Bond certificates. In such event the City will issue, transfer and exchange Bond certificates as requested by DTC and any other registered owner in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event, if no successor securities depository is appointed, the City will issue and the Registrar will authenticate Bond certificates in accordance with this resolution and the provisions hereof will apply to the transfer, exchange and method of payment thereof. 4464860 NMI CR100 -16 9 7.05. Payments to Cede & Co. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution to the contrary, so long as a Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond will be made and given, respectively in the manner provided in DTC's Operational Arrangements, as set forth in the Representation Letter. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. 8.01. Execution of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. "Continuing Disclosure Certificate" means that certain Continuing Disclosure Certificate executed by the Mayor and City Administrator and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof. 8.02. City Compliance with Provisions of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, failure of the City to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Certificate is not to be considered an event of default with respect to the Bonds; however, any Bondholder may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this section. 8.03. Limited Continuing Disclosure. In order to qualify the Bonds for limited continuing disclosure under paragraph (d)(2) of Securities and Exchange Commission Rules, Section 15c2 -12 (the "SEC Rule "), the City makes the following factual statement and representation: as of the date of delivery of the Bonds, the City will not be an obligated person (as defined in paragraph (f) of the SEC Rule) with respect to more than $10,000,000 in aggregate amount of outstanding municipal securities, including the Bonds and excluding municipal securities that were exempt from the SEC Rule pursuant to paragraph (d)(1) thereof. Section 9. Defeasance. When all Bonds and all interest thereon have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds will cease, except that the pledge of the full faith and credit of the City for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will remain in fill force and effect. The City may discharge all Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full. If any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.) 4464860 MNI CR100 -16 10 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 4464860 MNI CR100 -16 11 EXHIBIT A PROPOSALS 446486v1 MNI CR100 -16 A -1 EXHIBIT B FORM OF BOND No. R- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BOND SERIES 2014B Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP February 1, 20 August 1, 2014 Registered Owner: Cede & Co. The City of Corcoran, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing municipal corporation in Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City "), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above or registered assigns, the principal sum of $ on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2015, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by Northland Trust Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as Registrar, Paying Agent, Transfer Agent and Authenticating Agent, or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. The City may elect on February 1, 2022, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2023. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC ") of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. The City Council has designated the issue of Bonds of which this Bond forms a part as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ") relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limit allowed by the Code for the calendar year of issue. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $ all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, amount, redemption privilege, and interest rate, 4464860 MNI CR100 -16 B -I all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2014 (the "Resolution "), for the purpose of providing money to aid in financing the construction of various water and sewer improvements within the City and to fund certain costs of improvements to the public works building within the City, pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution, laws of the State of Minnesota, and Home Rule Charter of the City, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, as amended. The principal of and interest on the Bonds of this issue are payable primarily from net revenues of the water and sewer system of the City in a special debt service fund of the City, as set forth in the Resolution to which reference is made for a full statement of rights and powers thereby conferred. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for payment of this Bond and the City Council has obligated itself to levy ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City in the event of any deficiency in net revenues pledged, which taxes may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED That in and by the Resolution, the City has covenanted and agreed that it will continue to own and operate the water plant and sewer system free from competition by other like municipal utilities; that adequate insurance on said plant and system and suitable fidelity bonds on employees will be carried; that proper and adequate books of account will be kept showing all receipts and disbursements relating to the Utility Fund, into which it will pay all of the gross revenues from the water and sewer system; that it will also create and maintain a General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B Debt Service Fund, into which it will pay, out of the net revenues from the water and sewer system a sum sufficient to pay principal hereof and interest thereon when due; and that it will provide, by ad valorem tax levies, for any deficiency in required net water and sewer system revenues. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar will be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution, laws of the State of Minnesota and Home Rule Charter of the City to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required, and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional, statutory or charter limitation or of indebtedness. This Bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. 4464860 NMI CR100 -16 B -2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile or manual signatures of the Mayor and City Administrator and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: August 1, 2014 CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA (Facsimile) (Facsimile) Mayor City Administrator CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICES :A Authorized Representative ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, will be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants in common TEN ENT -- as tenants by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts or Transfers to Minors Act, State of Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 4464860 MNI CR100 -16 B -3 ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a financial institution that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program ( "STAMP "), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program ( "SEMP "), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signatures Program ( "MSP ") or other such "signature guarantee program" as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, SEMP or MSP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the information concerning the assignee requested below is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if this Bond is held by joint account.) Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee 4464860 MNI CR100 -16 B -4 1' 11iIR"XMM I WMI17r�1 [�3►`� The ownership of the principal of and interest on the within Bond has been registered on the books of the Registrar in the name of the person last noted below. Date of Registration Registered Owner Cede & Co. Federal ID #13- 2555119 446486v1 MNI CR100 -16 B -5 Signature of Officer of Re ig strar STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. CITY OF CORCORAN ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the "City "), do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on July 24, 2014, with the original minutes on file in my office and the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of the $ General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B. WITNESS My hand officially as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this 24th day of July, 2014. City Clerk Corcoran, Minnesota (SEAL) 4464860 NMI CR100 -16 STATE OF MINNESOTA CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER AS TO COUNTY OF HENNEPIN REGISTRATION WHERE NO AD VALOREM TAX LEVY I, the undersigned County Auditor /Treasurer of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certify that a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the "City'), on July 24, 2014, relating to the City's $ City of Corcoran, Minnesota General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, dated August 1, 2014, has been filed in my office and said obligations have been registered on the register of obligations in my office. WITNESS My hand and official seal this day of , 2014. County Auditor /Treasurer Hennepin County, Minnesota (SEAL) By Deputy 4464860 NMI CR100 -16 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item. 11 b. Council Meeting: Prepared By: July 24, 2014 Brad Martens Topic: Action Required: Feasibility Studies — Peachtree Partners Review and Comment Summary: On June 12, 2014 the City Council approved a comprehensive plan amendment for the Schendel property which Peachtree Partners is proposing to develop as low density. The next step in the process was to complete three feasibility studies related to the project. These studies have been completed and are attached to this report. It is requested that the City Council review the studies and provide any comments to staff. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We believe that fiscal responsibility, and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. OPEN AND HONEST COMMUNICATION We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. Options: 1. Review and comment on feasibility studies. Recommendation: N/A Council Action: Review and comment on feasibility studies. Attachments: 1. Stormwater Feasibility Study 2. Transportation Feasibility Study 3. Utility Feasibility Study We � � � Wenck File #2294 -24 JULY 2014 Engineers • Scientists Business Professionals unmatched Service technical -,��Ilence 1 Stormwater Feasibility Study Peachtree Development Prepared for: THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ ............................1 -1 2.0 WATER RESOURCES ...................................................................... ............................2 -1 2.1 Regulatory Agencies ............................................................... ............................2 -1 2.2 Wetlands ................................................................................. ............................2 -1 2.3 Water Quantity ....................................................................... ............................2 -2 2.4 Water Quality .......................................................................... ............................2 -2 2.5 Floodplain ............................................................................... ............................2 -2 2.6 Erosion and Sediment Controls .............................................. ............................2 -2 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................... ............................3 -1 FIGURES 1 FEMA Floodplain APPENDICES Appendix A: City Water Resources Plan & Historical Photos Appendix B: MNRAM Review Appendix C: Filtration BMP Details T: \2294- Corcoran \24 -Pea chtree\Fe as ibi I ity Study \stormwaterfeasibiIity study \Stormwater Feasibility Study. docx i July 2014 Wenck 1.0 Introduction Peachtree Properties is proposing a development near the "10 -50" intersection in Corcoran on property known as the Schendel property. Three feasibility studies are being completed for the project and they involve transportation, utilities and stormwater. The development area is shown on Figure 1, which also shows the 100 and 500 year floodplains. This report introduces topics pertinent to the development in stormwater management, natural resources, floodplain and Best Management Practices. 1 -1 T: \2294- Corcoran \24 -Pea chtree\Fe as ibi I ity Study \stormwater feasibility study \Stormwater Feasibility Study. docx July ,1fu ly2014 = Y e n ck 2.0 Water Resources 2.1 Regulatory Agencies The City is responsible for development approvals, however residential and commercial site development plans must also be reviewed and approved by Elm Creek Watershed. A developer is required to plan for water quality design, hydrology design, any compensatory floodplain mitigation plan for floodplain fill, a wetland replacement plan and an erosion and sediment control plan. During construction, the MPCA's NPDES Construction Permit is also required for control of erosion and sediment and also BMPs. 2.2 Wetlands A wetland delineation has been reviewed and approved for all areas of this site. The Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission is the Local Government Unit in charge of administering the Wetland Conservation Act in CorcoranA wetland replacement plan will be necessary for any impacts to wetlands on site. The replacement plan must include a sequencing analysis for each impact and abide by the Commissions wetland review process. Recent Work A MnRAM analysis was performed to review wetland classification in March of 2014, and the wetlands on the site are all classified as Medium or High according to the City's classification system. Section 1020.020 of the City Ordinance demonstrates that wetlands are to be ranked as high, medium, or low quality based on the functional level ranking of six selected categories from the MnRAM analysis: Floral Diversity /Integrity, Flood /Stormwater Attenuation, Water Quality Protection, Wildlife and /or Fishery Habitat, and Aesthetic /Recreation. The majority of the wetlands were observed to have low quality vegetation communities, but the high and moderate scores in other categories led to the medium or high rankings by the City's classification system. This indicates potential to improve these vegetation communities through restoration or management efforts. Buffers Buffers will be required around impacted and replacement wetlands according to the City and WCA rules and the Commission's wetland review process. A buffer would also be required on any portion of Rush Creek. 2 -1 T: \2294- Corcoran \24 -Pea chtree\Fe as ibi I ity Study \stormwater feasibility study \Stormwater Feasibility Study. docx AJuly 2014 e4 PWn %( k 2.3 Water Quantity The Commission requires post development runoff rates for the 2, 10 and 100 -year storm events be equal to or less than the pre - development rates. The Commission standards include extended detention and /or runoff volume controls. The City and watershed both review these calculations for overall stormwater management. The downstream creek /stream is the nearest regional water resource and therefore the extended detention review is important to overall peak flow management. Urbanizing watersheds impact rural ditches /streams through continuous flow, whereas agricultural land can be intermittent streams and the stream has adapted to being dry, or drier, for a portion of the year. The City will conduct a walkthrough of the downstream creek, and review the condition for any susceptible areas of degredation. This stream is located on private property, so the City may be limited in its investigation by property access. 2.4 Water Quality The project must comply with the Commission's non - degradation standard for storm water runoff quality, as outlined in Appendix F of the Watershed Management Plan. The City implements a BMP of filtration, which can be utilized as standalone dry basins, or constructed within a typical NURP pond. A detail for the required BMP is given in Appendix B. 2.5 Floodplain The site has a minor area identified on the north as floodplain, which appears unaffected by the project. Should impacts occur, the Elm Creek WMC standards prohibit activities that impact the storage volume within the 100 -year floodplain unless compensatory floodplain mitigation is provided at a 1:1 ratio by volume and it is demonstrated that the 100 -year floodplain will not be impacted. Section 1050.030 of the City's code states the Engineer should review the boundary for accuracy. "Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundaries of the district as shown on the Official Zoning Map, as for example where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions and there is a formal appeal of the decision of the City Engineer, the City Council shall make the necessary interpretation. All decisions will be based on elevations on the regional (100 year) flood profile, the ground elevations that existed on the site at the time the Community adopted its initial Floodplain Ordinance, and other available technical data. Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the City Council and to submit technical evidence." 2.6 Erosion and Sediment Controls An erosion and sediment control plan must be provided that addresses and minimizes erosion during all phases of the development and construction process. This activity is covered under a development's NPDES permit required by the MPCA (and monitored by the developer and City Engineer). 2 -2 T: \2294- Corcoran \24 -Pea chtree\Fe as ibi I ity Study \stormwater feasibility study \Stormwater Feasibility Study. docx July 2014 Y Wenck 3.0 Recommendations The Peachtree development on the Schendel property is feasible from a stormwater management and natural resource perspective. It is recommended the following be part of the development review process: On site • Investigate restoring the historical flow path shown on aerials and the City's storm water plan. Investigation will consist of topographic surveying and designs for potentially discharging further west than the current north discharge point. • Review submittals to watershed and work in coordination with Elm Creek WMC on stormwater BM Ps. • Provide the developer modeling and construction parameters for the developed land use (runoff curve numbers, routing direction, structure requirements, etc. • Install filtration BMP in addition to typical wet detention (NURP) ponds • Review wetland mitigation areas and any banking will be reviewed for conflicts with City via covenants or maintenance. Off Site Conduct walkthrough of stream to north to investigate for areas susceptible to erosion due to additional volume from development. Developer may be required to fund selected reinforcement of streambed, which includes easement for City access. (This was also a requirement of a prior development, Lennar in SE Corcoran.) Potentially conduct additional floodplain work to identify /verify elevations. 3 -1 T: \2294- Corcoran \24 -Pea chtree\Fe as ibi I ity Study \stormwater feasibility study \Stormwater Feasibility Study. docx AJuly 2014 Y Y enc k Figures FEMA Floodplain JULY 2014 CITY OF CORCORAN Wenck Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center FEMA Floodplains Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 Figure 1 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 Appendix A City Water Resources Plan and Historical Aerial Photos Figure 5 fa City of CORCORAN Water Resources 2030 Comprehensive Plan N W E S 3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet =.1. City Limit DNR Public Watercourse ••••.. Other Watercourse - DNR Protected Waters Other Open Water Wetlands from Hennepin County MLCCS October 7, 2009 Bonestroo I:/ 504 / 50408144 /GIS /ComPlan /Maps /Final Maps /water resources.mxd CITY OF CORCORAN Comp Plan Water Resources (Cropped) Wenck Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Engineers • Scientists P.O. Box 249 Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 JULY 2014 FIGURE A -1 Path: N: \Tech Date Saved: 9, CITY OF CORCORAN 1937 Aerial Photograph '/� / Wenck Associates, Inc. V Y k 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Engineers • Scientists P.O. Box 249 Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 JULY 2014 FIGURE 1 r'R s .. i f' CITY OF CORCORAN IWend< Wenck Associates, Inc. JULY 2014 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Engineers • Scientists P.O. Box 249 1947 Aerial Photograph Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 Figure 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 1957 Aerial Photograph { q /��CI� Wenck Associates, Inc. V V 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Engineers • Scientists P.O. Box 249 Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 JULY 2014 Figure 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 1960 Aerial Photograph { q /��CI� Wenck Associates, Inc. V V 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Engineers • Scientists P.O. Box 249 Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 J U LY 2014 Figure 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 1962 Aerial Photograph { A /�j��l Wenck Associates, Inc. V V K 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Engineers • Scientists P.O. Box 249 Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 JULY 2014 Figure 1 4 �,r mom i { t - w - CITY OF CORCORAN Wenck Wenck Associates, Inc. JULY 2014 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Engineers • Scientists P.O. Box 249 1971 Aerial Photograph Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 Figure 1 _ a f Aerial Photograph (Source: MN GEO) N 350 175 0 350 n Feet N lath: L:\2294 \0024 \mxd \Historical Aerial Photographs.mxd 'ate: 7/8/2014 Time: 9:34:46 AM User: ShuJCO243 4 t J a ate. AII& 1� 4 Al � Y a CITY OF CORCORAN 1991 Aerial Photograph i Wenck JULY 2014 Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 Figure 1 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 'N r L 44- Jill i{ Aerial Photograph (Source: MN GEO) LLL 350 175 0 350 N Feet ath: 1.:\2294 \0024 \mxd \Historical Aerial Photographs.mxd ate: 7/8/2"4 Tme: 9:37:43 AM User: ShuJCO243 CITY OF CORCORAN 1997 Aerial Photograph JULY 2014 Figure 1 Wenck Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 JULY 2014 Figure 1 6 s _ Aerial Photograph (Source: MN GEO) 350 175 0 350 N Feet ath: L:\2294 \0024 \mxd \Historical Aerial Photographs.mxd ate: 7/8/2014 Tme: 9:38:28 AM User: ShuJCO243 CITY OF CORCORAN 2000 Aerial Photograph JULY 2014 Figure 1 Wenck Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 JULY 2014 Figure 1 I w 4 t, y Aerial Photograph (Source: MN GEO) 350 175 0 350 N - Feet Vath: L:\2294 \0024 \mxd \Historical Aerial Photographs.mxd ate: 718/2014 Time: 9:36:37 AM User: ShuJCO243 CITY OF CORCORAN 2003 Aerial Photograph JULY 2014 Figure 1 Wenck Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 JULY 2014 Figure 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2006 Aerial Photograph Wenck Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 z :t yy iw L Aerial Photograph (Source: MN GEO) 350 175 0 350 n .1 Feet N ath: l.:\2294 \0024 \mxd \Historical Aerial Photographs.mxd- ate: 7/8/2014 Tme: 9:48:45 AM User: ShuJCO243 CITY OF CORCORAN 2006 Aerial Photograph JULY 2014 Figure 1 Wenck Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 JULY 2014 Figure 1 Appendix 6 MN RAM Review 4�4A`Wenck Engineers • Scientists Business Professionals TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: City of Corcoran FROM: Wes Boll, Wenck Associates, Inc. DATE: March 18, 2013 Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0249 (800) 472 -2232 (763) 479 -4200 Fax (763) 479 -4242 wenckmp @wenck.com www.wenck.com SUBJECT: Schendel Property Wetland Functional Assessment Report and Woodland /Forest Evaluation This technical memorandum is prepared by Wenck Associates, Inc. (Wenck) to provide a review of evaluation of woodland /forest areas and wetlands located on the Schendel property in the City of Corcoran. The evaluations were prepared for Peachtree Partners by Stantec Consulting ( Stantec). The submitted documents included a March 4, 2014 letter providing a summary report of the conditions of the woodland /forest areas on the site and comparing the current conditions to the qualitative rank given to the site during a Natural Resources Inventory conducted in 2001. A wetland Functional Assessment Report which summarized a MnRAM analysis conducted on the site based on current conditions classified the wetlands according to the City's classification system for wetlands. Woodland /Forest Analysis The woodland area on the Schendel property was identified during the 2001 Natural Resource Inventory as Site 28 "Maple- Basswood Forest ". This woodland community was assigned a Local Rank score of "High ", due to it's location within the South Rush Creek Corridor, and a lower Ecological Status score of "B /C ", based on the nature of disturbance and the presence of exotic species (buckthorn). The letter summarizing current conditions documents that the site would more appropriately be classified as a young elm- ash - basswood forest. The letter also states that due to the lack of mature trees, the prevalence of invasive and nonnative shrubs, and the lack of native species in the ground cover, that the qualitative rank for the site would more appropriately be low to very low (CD to D). Of the two stands of forest evaluated on the site, the north stand was said to be of a higher quality with a better potential for restoration. The letter appears to accurately describe the current condition of the site based on photos contained in the document and makes a valid argument for the reclassification of the Ecological Status of the woodland /forest community. The vegetation community remains in a high priority area according to the 2001 Natural Resource Inventory and according to the Inventory would retain it's local rank of "High" due to it's location within the South Rush Creek Corridor. t: \2294 - corcoran \24 -pea chtree\feasibi I ity study \stormwater feasibility study \app -c technical memo_functiona l assess ment.docx Based on the results of this analysis, it appears that the woodland forest community in the northern portion of the property is in better condition and would be worth the effort of restoring or improving. The community to the east appears to be further degraded without high potential for successful restoration or improvement without significant effort. Wetland Analysis Stantec completed a functional assessment on 11 wetlands that were delineated on the subject property using MnRAM 3.4. The applicant prepared the MnRAM to classify the wetlands according to the City's classification system. As required by the City Zoning Ordinance, the report provided the results from the analysis using the latest version of MnRAM. Section 1020.020 of the City Ordinance demonstrates that wetlands are to be ranked as high, medium, or low quality based on the functional level ranking of six selected categories from the MnRAM analysis: Floral Diversity /Integrity, Flood /Stormwater Attenuation, Water Quality Protection, Wildlife and /or Fishery Habitat, and Aesthetic /Recreation. Table 1 below illustrates the functional ranking in each of these categories and the appropriate City Classification according to the results of the MnRAM conducted by Stantec. Table 1 -MnRAM Analysis Results According to the MnRAM analysis, as documented in the report dated March 5, 2014, the wetlands on the site are all classified as Medium or High according to the City's classification system. The majority of the wetlands were observed to have low quality vegetation communities, but the high and moderate scores in other categories led to the medium or high rankings by the City's classification system. While all of the wetlands scored medium or high according to the City's classification system, many of these basins had low quality vegetation communities, which indicates potential to improve these vegetation communities through restoration or management efforts. T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 -Pea chtree\Fe asibi Iity Stu dy \stormwater feasibility study\ App -C Technical Memo_Functiona I Assess ment.docx We n c k City MnRAM Maint. of Maint. Of Aesthetics/ Classification Vegetative Char. of Char. Recreation/ Downstream System Type (Eggers Diversity/ Wildlife Fish Education/ Flood /Stormwater/ Water (2014 Wetland ID I& Reed ) Integrity Habitat Habitat lCultural Attenuation Quality MnRAM A Wet meadow Low Moderate NA Low Moderate High Medium B Wet meadow Low Moderate NA Low Moderate High Medium C Shallow marsh High High High Low Moderate High High Seasonally D 1flooded basin Low High NA 1 Low Moderate High High E Wet meadow Low High NA Low Moderate High High Seasonally F T1 flooded flat Low Moderate NA Low Moderate Moderate Medium F T2 Wet meadow Moderate High NA Low Moderate High High G Wet meadow Low High NA Low Moderate Moderate Medium Seasonally flooded H flood lain Low Moderate NA Low Moderate Moderate Medium Seasonally Site 3 flooded basin Low I Moderate INA I Low High I High Medium Seasonally Site 4 flooded flat Low Moderate N Low Moderate High Medium According to the MnRAM analysis, as documented in the report dated March 5, 2014, the wetlands on the site are all classified as Medium or High according to the City's classification system. The majority of the wetlands were observed to have low quality vegetation communities, but the high and moderate scores in other categories led to the medium or high rankings by the City's classification system. While all of the wetlands scored medium or high according to the City's classification system, many of these basins had low quality vegetation communities, which indicates potential to improve these vegetation communities through restoration or management efforts. T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 -Pea chtree\Fe asibi Iity Stu dy \stormwater feasibility study\ App -C Technical Memo_Functiona I Assess ment.docx We n c k Appendix C Filtration BMP Details a N V b a N v _T n E v 0 0 i All 6" PVC PIPE OUTLET PIPE I PLAN VIEW ° NWL CONTROL 0 0 6" TILE ( SHOULD BE CORE DRILLED IN FIELD) OUTLET PIPE WEIR TO BE POURED IN PLACE OR PRECAST. NO SLIDE IN WEIR WALLS. I INLET PIPE � V INLET PIPE FILTRATION VOLUME EL 100.0 NWL EL 99.5 EL 97.0 (OR FIELD SURVEYED) PROFILE NOTE: TILE CAN DAYLIGHT SEPARATELY FROM OUTLET STRUCTURE. TILE MUST BE ABOVE THE TOP OF OUTLET PIPE AND BELOW ELEVATION OF TILE IN THE TRENCH. CLILNI PROJLCI STANDARD PLATES Wenck CITY OF CORCORAN SHEET TITLE TYPICAL _- OUTLET STRUCTURE REV OWN APP REV DATE OWN BY CHK'D APP'D I DWG DATE PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. REV NO JUL 2014 1 KBM I ISCALE 2294 -00 STO -19 M N r. 0 _T E 0 a oI FILTRATION SHELF n PLACE TILE PARALLEL ON SHELF 10'- 15' OFFSET FILTRATION TRENCH A STORMWATER POND OUTFLOW PIPE J AND STRUCTURE ( SEE OUTLET STRUCTURE DETAIL) PLAN CI-IFI F v TRENCH DETAIL SECTION A —A CALCULATIONS TO MEET RULES VOLUME: NO VOLUME REDUCTION IS GIVEN FOR FILTRATION SHELVES. WATER WATER QUALITY CREDIT FOR TP IS CALCULATED AS 60% OF NURP QUALITY: VOLUME AND 75% OF FILTRATION VOLUME; CREDIT FOR TSS IS CALCULATED AS 80% OF NURP VOLUME AND 90% OF FILTRATION VOLUME. Y z DRAWDOWN: 48 HOUR DRAWDOWN OF BMPS IS REQUIRED. TO DETERMINE LENGTH OF TRENCH NEEDED, USE FILTRATION RATE OF 50 CF PER LINEAR FOOT OF T WIDE TRENCH, OR 17 CF PER SF OF TRENCH. i CLIENT PROJECT STANDARD PLATES Wen r L CITY OF CORCORAN e. ..� . m, .a �._�. ila TITLE TYPICAL FILTRATION SHELF 0 REV DWN APP REV DATE DWN BY CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE PROJECT N0, SHEET NO. REV N0. K JUL 2014 KBM SCALE 2294 -00 STO -20 Wenck Wk File #2294 -24 July 2014 Engineers • Scientists Business Professionals unmatched Service strateqic Advice 1 Transportation Feasibility Study Peachtree Development Prepared for: THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ ............................1 -1 1.1 Background ............................................................................. ............................1 -1 1.2 County Road 10 Turnback ....................................................... ............................1 -1 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................ ............................2 -1 2.1 Configuration .......................................................................... ............................2 -1 2.2 Traffic Volume Data ................................................................ ............................2 -1 2.3 Traffic Forecasts ...................................................................... ............................2 -1 2.4 Traffic Projections for 2030 .................................................... ............................2 -2 2.5 Traffic Signal Warrants ............................................................ ............................2 -2 2.6 Conclusions ............................................................................. ............................2 -2 3.0 ROAD NETWORK CONFIGURATIONS .............................................. ............................3 -1 3.1 County Road 10 Alignment ..................................................... ............................3 -1 3.1.1 Meister Road — Option A ......................................... ............................3 -1 3.1.2 „T" at CR 50— Option C ........................................... ............................3 -1 3.2 CR 10 CR 50 Interesection ....................................................... ............................3 -2 3.2.1 Option B1- A ............................................................. ............................3 -2 3.2.2 Option BI- B ............................................................. ............................3 -2 3.2.3 Option B2 ................................................................ ............................3 -3 3.2.4 Option B3 ................................................................ ............................3 -3 3.2.5 Option B4 ................................................................ ............................3 -3 4.0 FINANCING ................................................................................... ............................4 -1 4.1 Approach ................................................................................. ............................4 -1 TABLES 1 -7 of Estimated Costs FIGURES APPENDICES Appendix A: Peachtree Concept Entrance to 50, Classification Figure, Traffic Counts Appendix B: County 10 Turn Back Memo Appendix C: Peak Hour Turn Movement Volumes T: \2294- Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study \transportation \Transporatation Feasibility Study.dou i July 2014 -,eiWenck 1.0 Introduction Peachtree Properties have requested a feasibility study for potential access and estimated costs for transportation improvements to serve the proposed development generally located in the northwest of the intersection of County Road 10 and County Road 50. The entrance to the development is proposed to be on to County Road 10. This report looks specifically at the feasibility of providing transportation needs for ultimate buildout. Contained in the report are options for road configurations, access to the site and a traffic analysis to determine impacts and potential need for traffic signal at the "10 -50" intersection. 1.1 BACKGROUND The "10/50" and "10 -116" intersections have had numerous studies and potential alignments. The City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a realignment of CR 10 to Meister Road along with Larkin Road being reconstructed as an A Minor Connector. The 2030 Roadway Functional Classification is given in Appendix A (published June 2011 and updated April 2014). 1.2 COUNTY ROAD 10 TURNBACK The Council has recently discussed accepting jurisdiction of County Road 10 under a "turn back" agreement with Hennepin County. County Road 10 is listed in the County's own plan as being eventually under City jurisdiction. A memo reviewing turn back costs for reconstruction and maintenance is given in Appendix B. Council is not pursuing a turn back at this time, however this report reviews two alignments and costs for reconstruction of CR 10 along Meister or west of a development known as Corcoran Trail. 1 -1 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study\ transportation \Transporatation Feasibility Study.doa July 2014 Wenck 2.0 Traffic Analysis 2.1 CONFIGURATION The CR 50 /CR 10 intersection is currently configured as a "Y" type intersection, with CR 10 serving as the mainline and eastbound CR 50 controlled with a stop sign. CR 10 curves to the northwest at this location, creating an awkward intersection with CR 50. Improvements to the intersection layout are being developed in conjunction with the proposed project, however in the long term improvements to the intersection are needed whether or not the proposed development occurs. 2.2 TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA Intersection turn movement data was collected at the CR 50 /CR 10 intersection on Thursday, July 10, 2014. The resultant turn movement data is shown in Appendix C. Observations during the data collection periods indicated some operational difficulties due to the intersection geometrics combined with the high volumes. Westbound left turns from CR 10 onto CR 50 must turn from the through lane, resulting in conflicts with traffic continuing on CR 10. Eastbound traffic on CR 50 must wait for gaps in the CR 10 traffic, resulting in delays. The awkward angle of the CR 10 leg to the northwest creates difficult sight lines for eastbound traffic on CR 50. The traffic volumes at this intersection are highly directional during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. During the a.m. peak hour, which occurred from 7:00 — 8:00 am, 49% of vehicles entered from the northwest on CR 10, 36% from the west on CR 50, and 15% from the east on CR 10. During the p.m. peak hour, which occurred from 4:30 — 5:30 pm, 7% of vehicles entered from the northwest on CR 10, 16% from the west on CR 50, and 77% from the east on CR 10. In addition to peak hour data, daily volume data is available from Hennepin County. The most recent data for this area was collected in 2013. The annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume on CR 10 north of CR 50 was 2,600 vehicles per day. The AADT on CR 50 west of CR 10 was 2,900 vehicles per day. The percentage of the daily volume occurring during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours was also determined. On CR 10 north of CR 50, the a.m. peak hour volume was 13.3% of the daily volume and the p.m. peak hour was 16% of the daily volume. On CR 50 west of CR 10, the a.m. peak hour volume was 10.8% of the daily volume and the p.m. peak hour was 13.3% of the daily volume. These percentages are higher than the typical 10% value found at many locations. The higher than usual percentages are likely due to the large amount of commuter traffic that is present at this intersection. 2.3 TRAFFIC FORECASTS Traffic volume forecasts were developed for the CR 50 /CR 10 intersection assuming development of the Schendel property. The expected development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Ninth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent gross total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in the following table. 2 -1 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study\ transportation \Transporatation Feasibility Study.doa July 2014 -id-1 1Nenck Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Land Uses Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Single Family Dwelling Units 226 DU 40 130 170 142 84 226 2152 Townhouse Dwelling Units 23 DU 2 8 10 8 4 12 134 Totals 42 138 180 150 88 238 2286 Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using trip distribution percentages based on existing travel patterns in the area. Traffic volumes were established for a five year build -out assumption during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figure 1. 2.4 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR 2030 The Hennepin County 2030 traffic volume forecasts show a daily volume of 4,800 on CR 10 in 2030 and a baseline volume of 3,050 in 2005. An interpolation of these numbers results in a daily volume of 4,100 on CR 10 in 2020. The Peachtree residential development is expected to generate 2,286 daily trips. Added to the base 2020 daily volume of 4,100 on CR 10 results in a total daily volume of 6,386. Of the 6,386 daily volume on CR 10, 36% is attributed to Peachtree and 64% is other background traffic. 2.5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS A preliminary review of traffic signal warrants was completed to determine if traffic signal control should be considered for the future CR 50 /CR 10 intersection. Using the peak period data collected at the intersection, the peak hour and four hour warrants as described in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD) were reviewed. Under existing 2014 conditions, neither of the warrants are met. Under 2019 Build -out conditions, the peak hour warrant is met for one hour and the four hour warrant is met for three hours. This analysis did not include other future development in the area, which is expected to occur in the downtown area. Based on this preliminary analysis, traffic signal control would not be needed immediately but would likely be warranted within five years. Even if signal warrants are met in the future, Hennepin County will make the final decision on any traffic control changes at this intersection. Hennepin County ranks intersections based on traffic volumes, crash history, and funding to determine when traffic signal control is needed. Further discussions with Hennepin County will be needed to determine if traffic signal control can be installed at this intersection. 2.6 CONCLUSIONS The traffic volumes at the CR 50 /CR 10 intersection are highly directional during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Observations during the data collection periods indicated some operational difficulties due to the difficult intersection geometrics combined with the high volumes. • Improvements to the intersection layout are needed independent of the proposed development. Traffic volumes added by the proposed development make the need for 2 -2 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study\ transportation \Transporatation Feasibility Study.doa July 2%(014 =AA Pnck improvements more evident and necessary. • Existing volumes do not meet traffic signal warrants. Future volumes with the full development in place will likely meet warrants by 2019. • Even if signal warrants are met in the future, Hennepin County will make the final decision on any traffic control changes at this intersection. Further discussions with Hennepin County will be needed to determine if traffic signal control can be installed at this intersection. 2 -3 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study\ transportation \Transporatation Feasibility Study.doa July 2014 Wenck 3.0 Road Network Configurations The engineering drawings given as Sheets C -101 through C -105 show several options for different configurations of the road network. Costs are given in Tables 1 through 6. 3.1 COUNTY ROAD 10 ALIGNMENT As noted previously, the City is not pursuing a turnback at this time. The configurations shown on Sheet C -101 "move" the County road to either Meister Road (Option A) or an extension of Cain Road (Option C). 3.1.1 Meister Road — Option A The project involves reconstruction of the existing Meister Road with a "T" intersection at CR 116 and four -way intersection with Cain Road. County staff initial feedback was creating a "T" intersection at CR 116 was not problematic, therefore the alignment appears feasible. The alignment does create an additional turn movement for northwest /southeast traffic whereas northwest traffic from the CR 116 / CR 10 intersection would need to travel north along CR 116, then turn left (west) onto Meister. The addition of traffic onto CR 116 for a short distance would need to be managed via extended turn lanes and possible signal at CR 116. Costs are given in Table 1 and show the following: • Construction $4.4M (includes significant ROW and poor soils correction at approx. $750K) Contingency 20% and Engineering 15% Total Project at $5.9M 3.1.2 "T" at CR 50— Option C Option C shows a new alignment to direct traffic onto CR 50 which would be a "T" intersection. Ultimate buildout shows the potential to connect with a Larkin Road extension as shown in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The project lowers some costs as compared to Option A such as the new road length is lower than Meister and eliminates intersection complexity with Cain /Meister and has dedicated half -ROW in Corcoran Trail development. The project has higher costs of estimated soil correction and wetland mitigation since the route crosses significant wetlands. Costs are given in Table 2 and show the following: • Construction $4.OM (includes significant poor soils correction and wetland work at $1.5M) • Contingency 20% and Engineering 15% • Total Project at $5.45M (wetland soil conditions will affect final cost) • Additional intersection work at Meister /CR 10 connection would increase cost 3 -1 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study\ transportation \Transporatation Feasibility Study.doa July 2014 Aid Wenck 3.2 CR 10 CR 50 INTERESECTION The 10 -50 intersection options are labeled "B Options" and focus on potential intersection configurations. The Peachtree entrances are shown at different locations, and it should be noted the main entrance to the development will likely be moved and is shown for illustrative purposes only. The final design criteria and ROW requirements will affect land impacts and alignments. 3.2.1 Option B1 -A Design criteria as shown on Sheet C -102A are: • 50 MPH Speed • 120' ROW This option eliminates the Y configuration and creates a T intersection however requires Peachtree land dedication to the 50 MPH road curvature and removes existing businesses at the intersection. Should the option be considered for further evaluation, moving the T slightly east may avoid one of the businesses. Costs are given in Table 3 and show the following: • Construction $1.6M • Contingency 20% and Engineering 15% • No land acquisition costs or demolition are included • Signal is included at $250K • Total Project at $2.2M 3.2.2 Option 61 -113 Design criteria are the same as B1 -A and are shown on Sheet C -102B as: • 50 MPH Speed • 120' ROW This option eliminates the Y configuration and creates a T intersection however preserves developable (Peachtree) property but then requires City Park land dedication. Businesses may be able to remain if flexibility of lesser ROW requirement is received from the County Costs are given in Table 4 and show the following: • Construction $1.5M • Contingency 20% and Engineering 15% • No land acquisition costs, demolition, or park replacement costs are included • Signal is included at $250K • Total Project at $2.OM 3 -2 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study\ transportation \Transporatation Feasibility Study.doa July 2014 Aid Wenck 3.2.3 Option B2 Design criteria was modified for a lower speed however the ROW remains the same (Sheet C -103). Criteria are: • 30 MPH Speed • 120' ROW This option also creates a T intersection, however preserves businesses and lessens Peachtree land impacts. Properties to the north of existing CR50 would need to be acquired, but the existing residential home remains. Access to the businesses would need to be clarified. Costs are given in Table 5 and show the following: • Construction $1.6M • Contingency 20% and Engineering 15% • No land acquisition costs or demolition costs are included • Signal is included at $250K • Total Project at $2.2M 3.2.4 Option B3 This option shows the Peachtree concept entrance through the City Park. The Peachtree concept has been further defined to show required turn lanes at the CR 50 intersection, and appears to need additional ROW. This concept is not feasible under County jurisdiction, and therefore not applicable. Costs are given in Table 6 and show the following: • Construction $1.1 M • Contingency 20% and Engineering 15% • No land acquisition costs, park replacement, or demolition costs are included • Signal is included at $250K • Total Project at $1.5M 3.2.5 Option B4 This option shows a roundabout concept with the Peachtree development being the 4th leg. The roundabout would also function as three legged without the development entrance. The project requires acquisition of two businesses, the properties to the north of CR 10 and a small easement of the existing residence. Costs are given in Table 7 and show the following: • Construction $1.OM • Contingency raised to 30% and Engineering 15% • No land acquisition costs or demolition costs are included • Access for south side of CR 50 and CR 10 needs to be provided • Total Project at $1.5M 3 -3 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study\ transportation \Transporatation Feasibility Study.doa July f 201 4 ' Vj�Ye r lck 4.0 Financing 4.1 APPROACH Financing will depend on the direction given for the road network in this area. Staff has had discussions with the County about available funds or programs, longer term CIP project lists, etc. Overall it appears that a three party financial approach is optimal, where the County, City and developer contribute to the ultimate road network. 4 -1 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study\ transportation \Transporatation Feasibility Study.docx July 2014 Wenck Tables Table 1. Option A Estimated Costs Peachtree Development Feasibility Study for Transportation MEISTER RD AND CAIN RD MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION ACRE EASEMENT $ 45,000.00 $ - TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE CLEARING $ 300.00 $ GRUBBING TREE GRUBBING $ 100.00 $ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 18,864 $ 3.00 $ 56,593.33 FABRIC SY 31,924 $ 3.10 $ 98,965.78 TOPSOIL CU YD 7,256 $ 20.00 $ 145,111.11 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 23,092 $ 15.00 $ 346,380.22 POOR SOIL CORRECTION CU YD 15,500 $ 25.00 $ 387,500.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 14,047 $ 12.00 $ 168,561.07 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING TON 2,235 $ 40.00 $ 89,388.44 SELECT GRANULAR TON 21,070 $ 15.00 $ 316,052.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 1,451 $ 4.00 $ 5,804.44 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 13,417 $ 90.00 $ 1,207,527.60 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH STORM SEWER PIPE $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF DRIVEWAY CULVERTS $ 75.00 $ - DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH 7 $ 800.00 $ 5,600.00 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD SILT FENCE $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 14,366 $ 2.00 $ 28,732.00 SEEDING SY 43,533 $ 0.50 $ 21,766.67 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH STRIPING $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 19,590 $ 0.60 $ 11,754.00 WETLAND IMPACTS ACRE 3.2 $ 55,000.00 $ 176,000.00 ROW ACQUISITION ACRE 7.4 $ 50,000.00 $ 370,000.00 $ OPTION A MAINLINE SUBTOTAL S 3.490.736.67 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 698,147.33 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 523,610.50 EST. TOTAL $ 4,712,494.50 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 4,700,000.00 CR -116, MEISTER RD, & CAIN RD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 EASEMENT ACRE TOTAL PROJECT COSTS TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE $ 300.00 $ - GRUBBING TREE $ 100.00 $ - REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 5200 $ 100 $ 15,600.00 FABRIC SY 10400 $ 3.10 $ 32,240.00 TOPSOIL CU YD 2000 $ 20.00 $ 40,000.00 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 7523 $ 15.00 $ 112,840.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 4576 $ 12.00 $ 54,912.00 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING TON 616 $ 40.00 $ 24,640.00 SELECT GRANULAR TON 6864 $ 15.00 $ 102,960.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 480 $ 4.00 $ 1,920.00 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 4438 $ 90.00 $ 399,427.20 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF $ 33.00 $ - INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH $ 800.00 $ RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD $ 120.00 $ - SILT FENCE LF 3960 $ 2.00 $ 7,920.00 SEEDING SY 12000 $ 0.50 $ 6,000.00 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 12000 $ 1.50 $ 18,000.00 STRIPING LF 9000 $ 0.60 $ 5,400.00 WETLAND IMPACTS SF $ 1.00 $ - PROPERTY ACQUISITION EACH $ - $ SIGNAL EACH $ $ OPTION A INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL S 866.85920 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 173,371.84 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 130,028.88 EST. TOTAL $ 1,170,259.92 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 1,200,000.00 SUMMARY Total Price OPTION A MAINLINE SUBTOTAL $ 4,700,000.00 OPTION A INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL $ 1,200,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 5,900,000.00 Table 2. Option C Estimated Costs Peachtree Development Feasibility Study for Transportation CAIN RD MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION ACRE TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 45,000.00 $ TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING ACRE 1.5 $ 10,000.00 $ 15,000.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 16,178 $ 5.00 $ 80,888.89 FABRIC SY 20,044 $ 3.10 $ 62,137.78 TOPSOIL CU YD 1 $ 20.00 $ 22.22 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 13,363 $ 15.00 $ 200,444.44 POOR SOIL CORRECTION CU YD 45,700 $ 25.00 $ 1,142,500.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 8,820 $ 12.00 $ 105,834.67 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING TON 1,403 $ 40.00 $ 56,124.44 SELECT GRANULAR TON 13,229 $ 15.00 $ 198,440.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 911 $ 4.00 $ 3,644.44 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 8,424 $ 90.00 $ 758,172.00 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF $ $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH $ $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF $ $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH $ $ 800.00 $ RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD $ $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 8,870 $ 2.00 $ 17,740.00 SEEDING SY 27,333 $ 0.50 $ 13,666.67 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 27,333 $ 1.50 $ 41,000.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH $ $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 12,300 $ 0.60 $ 7,380.00 WETLAND IMPACTS ACRE 9.40 $ 55,000.00 $ 517,000.00 ROW ACQUISITION ACRE 9.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 450,000.00 OPTION C MAINLINE SUBTOTAL $ 3,724,995.56 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 744,999.11 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 558,749.33 EST. TOTAL $ 5,028,744.00 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 5,000,000.00 CTY RD 50 & CAIN RD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 EASEMENT ACRE $ 450,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE $ 300.00 $ GRUBBING TREE $ 100.00 $ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 4,160 $ 3.00 $ 12,480.00 FABRIC SY 8,320 $ 3.10 $ 25,792.00 TOPSOIL CU YD 400 $ 20.00 $ 8,000.00 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 1,505 $ 15.00 $ 22,568.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 3,661 $ 12.00 $ 43 929.60 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING TON 493 $ 40.00 $ 19,712.00 SELECT GRANULAR TON 5,491 $ 15.00 $ 82,368.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 96 $ 4.00 $ 384.00 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 888 $ 90.00 $ 79,885.44 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH $ 800.00 $ RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 3,168 $ 2.00 $ 6,336.00 SEEDING SY 2,400 $ 0.50 $ 1,200.00 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 2,400 $ 1.50 $ 3,600.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 1,800 $ 0.60 $ 1,080.00 WETLAND IMPACTS SF $ 1.00 $ PROPERTY ACQUISITION EACH $ $ SIGNAL EACH $ $ OPTION C INTERSECTION SUBTOTALI $ 327,335.04 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 65,467.01 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 49,100.26 EST. TOTAL $ 441,902.30 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 450,000.00 SUMMARY Total Price OPTION C MAINLINE SUBTOTAL $ 5,000,000.00 OPTION C INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL $ 450,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 5,450,000.00 Table 3. Option 131 -A Estimated Costs Peachtree Development Feasibility Study for Transportation CTY RD 10 IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Pdce MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION ACRE ACRE $ 45,000.00 $ TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE TREE $ 300.00 $ GRUBBING TREE TREE $ 100.00 $ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 2,600 $ 3.00 $ 7,800.00 FABRIC SY 4,400 $ 3.10 $ 13,640.00 TOPSOIL CU YD 1,000 $ 20.00 $ 20,000.00 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 3,183 $ 15.00 $ 47,740.00 POOR SOIL CORRECTION CU YD 3,600 $ 25.00 $ 90,000.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 1,936 $ 12.00 $ 23,232.00 AGGREGATE BASE SURGACING CLASS 2 TON 308 $ 40.00 $ 12,320.00 SELECT GRANULAR TON 2,904 $ 15.00 $ 43,560.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 200 $ 4.00 $ 800.00 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 1,849 $ 90.00 $ 166,428.00 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF EACH $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH LF $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF EACH $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD LF $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 1,980 $ 2.00 $ 3,960.00 SEEDING SY 6,000 $ 0.50 $ 3,000.00 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 6,000 $ 1.50 $ 9,000.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH LF $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 2,700 $ 0.60 $ 1,620.00 WETLAND IMPACTS ACRE 0.5 $ 55,000.00 $ 27,500.00 ROW ACQUISITION ACRE EACH 1 $ OPTION B1 A MAINLINE SUBTOTALI $ 496,400.00 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 99,280.00 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 74,460.00 EST. TOTAL $ 670,140.00 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 700,000.00 CTY RD 10 & CTY RD 50 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 EASEMENT ACRE $ 1,500,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE $ 300.00 $ GRUBBING TREE $ 100.00 $ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 4,911 $ 3.00 $ 14,733.33 FABRIC SY 10,400 $ 3.10 $ 32,240.00 TOPSOIL CU YD 2,000 $ 20.00 $ 40,000.00 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 7,523 $ 15.00 $ 112,840.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 4,576 $ 12.00 $ 54,912.00 AGGREGATE BASE SURGACING CLASS 2 TON 616 $ 40.00 $ 24,640.00 SELECT GRANULAR TON 6,864 $ 15.00 $ 102,960.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 480 $ 4.00 $ 1,920.00 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 4,438 $ 90.00 $ 399,427.20 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 3,740 $ 2.00 $ 7,480.00 SEEDING SY 12,000 $ 0.50 $ 6,000.00 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 12,000 $ 1.50 $ 18,000.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 9,000 $ 0.60 $ 5,400.00 WETLAND IMPACTS SF $ 1.00 $ PROPERTY ACQUISITION EACH $ $ SIGNAL EACH 1 $250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 OPTION B1 A INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL $ 1,106,352.53 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 221,270.51 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 165,952.88 EST. TOTAL $ 1,493,575.92 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 1,500,000.00 SUMMARY Total Price OPTION B1 A MAINLINE SUBTOTAL $ 700,000.00 OPTION B1 A INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL $ 1,500,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 2,200,000.00 Assumes Peachtree ROW dedication and excludes any comercial business purchase costs. Table 4. Option 61 -13 Estimated Costs Peachtree Development Feasibility Study for Transportation CTY RD 10 IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION ACRE $ 30,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE $ 5,000.00 $ 300.00 $ GRUBBING TREE $ $ 100.00 $ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 1,676 $ 3.00 $ 5,026.67 FABRIC SY 2,836 $ 3.10 $ 8,790.22 TOPSOIL CU YD 644 $ 20.00 $ 12,888.89 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 2,051 $ 15.00 $ 30,765.78 POOR SOIL CORRECTION CU YD 2,800 $ 25.00 $ 70,000.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 1,248 $ 12.00 $ 14,971.73 AGGREGATE BASE SURGACING CLASS 2 TON 198 $ 40.00 $ 7,939.56 SELECT GRANULAR TON 1,871 $ 15.00 $ 28,072.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 129 $ 4.00 $ 515.56 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 1,192 $ 90.00 $ 107,253.60 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF $ $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH $ $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF $ $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD $ $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 1,276 $ 2.00 $ 2,552.00 SEEDING SY 3,867 $ 0.50 $ 1,933.33 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 3,867 $ 1.50 $ 5,800.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH $ $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 1,740 $ 0.60 $ 1,044.00 WETLAND IMPACTS ACRE 0.60 $ 55,000.00 $ 33,000.00 ROW ACQUISITION ACRE $ SIGNAL EACH OPTION B1 B MAINLINE SUBTOTALI $ 356,353.33 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 71,270.67 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 53,453.00 EST. TOTAL $ 481,077.00 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 500,000.00 CTY RD 10 & CTY RD 50 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 EASEMENT ACRE TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE $ 300.00 $ GRUBBING TREE $ 100.00 $ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 4,911 $ 3.00 $ 14,733.33 FABRIC SY 10,400 $ 3.10 $ 32,240.00 TOPSOIL CU YD 2,000 $ 20.00 $ 40,000.00 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 7,523 $ 15.00 $ 112,840.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 4,576 $ 12.00 $ 54,912.00 AGGREGATE BASE SURGACING CLASS 2 TON 616 $ 40.00 $ 24,640.00 SELECT GRANULAR TON 6,864 $ 15.00 $ 102,960.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 480 $ 4.00 $ 1,920.00 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 4,438 $ 90.00 $ 399,427.20 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 3,740 $ 2.00 $ 7,480.00 SEEDING SY 12,000 $ 0.50 $ 6,000.00 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 12,000 $ 1.50 $ 18,000.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 9,000 $ 0.60 $ 5,400.00 WETLAND IMPACTS SF $ 1.00 $ PROPERTY ACQUISITION EACH $ $ SIGNAL EACH 1 $250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 OPTION B1 B INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL $ 1,106,352.53 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 221,270.51 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 165,952.88 EST. TOTAL $ 1,493,575.92 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 1,500,000.00 SUMMARY Total Price OPTION B1 B MAINLINE SUBTOTAL $ 500,000.00 OPTION B1 B INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL $ 1,500,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 2,000,000.00 Table 5. Option B2 Estimated Costs Peachtree Development Feasibility Study for Transportation CTY RD 10 MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION ACRE $ 30,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE $ 5,000.00 $ 300.00 $ GRUBBING TREE $ - $ 100.00 $ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 1,444 $ 3.00 $ 4,333.33 FABRIC SY 2, 444 $ 3.10 $ 7,577.78 TOPSOIL CU YD 556 $ 20.00 $ 11,111.11 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 1,768 $ 15.00 $ 26,522.22 POOR SOIL CORRECTION CU YD 3,100 $ 25.00 $ 77,500.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 1,076 $ 12.00 $ 12,906.67 AGGREGATE BASE SURGACING CLASS 2 TON 171 $ 40.00 $ 6,844.44 SELECT GRANULAR TON 1,613 $ 15.00 $ 24,200.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 111 $ 4.00 $ 444.44 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 1,027 $ 90.00 $ 92,460.00 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF $ $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH $ $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF $ $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD $ $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 1,100 $ 2.00 $ 2,200.00 SEEDING SY 3,333 $ 0.50 $ 1,666.67 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 3,333 $ 1.50 $ 5,000.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH $ $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 1,500 $ 0.60 $ 900.00 WETLAND IMPACTS ACRE 1 $ 55,000.00 $ 27,500.00 ROW ACQUISITION ACRE 3 $ 65,000.00 $ 182,000.00 CONCRETE MEDIAN SF $ 250,000.00 OPTION $ OPTION B2 MAINLINE SUBTOTALI $ 513,966.67 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 102,793.33 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 77,095.00 EST. TOTAL $ 693,855.00 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 700,000.00 CTY RD 10 & CTY RD 50 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 EASEMENT ACRE TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE $ 300.00 $ - GRUBBING TREE $ 100.00 $ - REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 4,622 $ 3.00 $ 13,866.67 FABRIC SY 10,400 $ 3.10 $ 32,240.00 TOPSOIL CU YD 2,000 $ 20.00 $ 40,000.00 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 7,523 $ 15.00 $ 112,840.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 4,576 $ 12.00 $ 54,912.00 AGGREGATE BASE SURGACING CLASS 2 TON 616 $ 40.00 $ 24,640.00 SELECT GRANULAR TON 6,864 $ 15.00 $ 102,960.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 480 $ 4.00 $ 1,920.00 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 4,438 $ 90.00 $ 399,427.20 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 3,520 $ 2.00 $ 7,040.00 SEEDING SY 12,000 $ 0.50 $ 6,000.00 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 12,000 $ 1.50 $ 18,000.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 9,000 $ 0.60 $ 5,400.00 WETLAND IMPACTS SF $ 1.00 $ PROPERTY ACQUISITION EACH $ $ SIGNAL EACH 1 $250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 OPTION B2 INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL i $ 1,105,045.87 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 221,009.17 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 165,756.88 EST. TOTAL $ 1,491,811.92 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 1,500,000.00 SUMMARY Total Price OPTION B2 MAINLINE SUBTOTAL $ 700,000.00 OPTION B2 INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL $ 1,500,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 2,200,000.00 Table 6. Option 133 Estimated Costs Peachtree Development Feasibility Study for Transportation PEACHTREE ACCESS MAINLINE IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION ACRE $ 45,000.00 $ TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE $ 300.00 $ GRUBBING TREE $ 100.00 $ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 1271 $ 3.00 $ 3,813.33 FABRIC SY 2151 $ 3.10 $ 6,668.44 TOPSOIL CU YD 489 $ 20.00 $ 9,777.78 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 1556 $ 15.00 $ 23,339.56 POOR SOIL CORRECTION CU YD 1900 $ 25.00 $ 47,500.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 946 $ 12.00 $ 11,357.87 AGGREGATE BASE SURGACING CLASS 2 TON 151 $ 40.00 $ 6,023.11 SELECT GRANULAR TON 1420 $ 15.00 $ 21,296.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 98 $ 4.00 $ 391.11 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 904 $ 90.00 $ 81,364.80 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF 1 $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH $ 800.00 $ RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD 2376 $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 968 $ 2.00 $ 1,936.00 SEEDING SY 2933 $ 0.50 $ 1,466.67 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 29331 $ 1.50 1 $ 4,400.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH 5400 $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 1320 $ 0.60 $ 792.00 WETLAND IMPACTS ACRE 0.5 $ 55,000.00 $ 27,500.00 ROW ACQUISITION ACRE 1 $250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 OPTION B3 MAINLINE SUBTOTALI $ 277,626.67 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 55,525.33 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 41,644.00 EST. TOTAL $ 374,796.00 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 400,000.00 PEACHTREE ACCESS RD & CTY RD 50 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 EASEMENT ACRE $ 1,100,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE $ 300.00 $ GRUBBING TREE $ 100.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 3120 $ 3.00 $ 9,360.00 FABRIC SY 6240 $ 3.10 $ 19,344.00 TOPSOIL CU YD 1200 $ 20.00 $ 24,000.00 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 4514 $ 15.00 $ 67,704.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 2746 $ 12.00 $ 32,947.20 AGGREGATE BASE SURGACING CLASS 2 TON 370 $ 40.00 $ 14,784.00 SELECT GRANULAR TON 4118 $ 15.00 $ 61,776.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 288 $ 4.00 $ 1,152.00 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 2663 $ 90.00 $ 239,656.32 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SF $ 33.00 $ INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH $ 250.00 $ STORM SEWER PIPE LF $ 75.00 $ DRIVEWAY CULVERTS EACH 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD $ 120.00 $ SILT FENCE LF 2376 $ 2.00 $ 4,752.00 SEEDING SY 7200 $ 0.50 $ 3,600.00 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 7200 $ 1.50 $ 10,800.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EACH $ 125.00 $ STRIPING LF 5400 $ 0.60 $ 3,240.00 WETLAND IMPACTS SF $ 1.00 $ PROPERTY ACQUISITION EACH $ $ SIGNAL EACH 1 $250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 OPTION B3 INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL $ 778,915.52 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 155,783.10 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 116,837.33 EST. TOTAL $ 1,051,535.95 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 1,100,000.00 SUMMARY Total Price OPTION B3 MAINLINE SUBTOTAL $ 400,000.00 OPTION B3 INTERSECTION SUBTOTAL $ 1,100,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 1,500,000.00 Table 7. Option B4 Estimated Costs Peachtree Development Feasibility Study for Transportation Roundabout Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Price MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION ACRE $ 45,000.00 $ - TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CLEARING TREE $ 300.00 $ - GRUBBING TREE $ 100.00 $ - REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 4,564 $ 3.00 $ 13,693.33 FABRIC SY 4,916 $ 3.10 $ 15,238.22 TOPSOIL CU YD 1,756 $ 20.00 $ 35,111.11 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 3,556 $ 15.00 $ 53,333.78 POOR SOIL CORRECTION CU YD 6,800 $ 25.00 $ 170,000.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 2,163 $ 12.00 $ 25,954.13 SELECT GRANULAR TON 3,469 $ 15.00 $ 52,039.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 211 $ 4.00 $ 842.67 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TON 1,948 $ 90.00 $ 175,304.16 CONCRETE PAVEMENT SF 10,000 $ 10.00 $ 100,000.00 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 3,185 $ 25.00 $ 79,625.00 INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH 30 $ 300.00 $ 9,000.00 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 500 $ 50.00 $ 25,000.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 5 $ 3,500.00 $ 17,500.00 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU YD 25 $ 120.00 $ 3,000.00 SILT FENCE LF 2,000 $ 2.00 $ 4,000.00 SEEDING SY 10,533 $ 0.50 $ 5,266.67 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 10,533 $ 1.50 $ 15,800.00 STRIPING LF 4,740 $ 0.60 $ 2,844.00 ROUND -A -BOUT LANDSCAPING FOR ISLAND LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 WETLAND IMPACTS ACRE 0.5 $ 55,000.00 $ 27,500.00 ROW ACQUISITION 1 $ - OPTION B4 SUBTOTAL $ 946,052.07 CONTINGENCY (30 %) $ 283,815.62 PERMITTING AND APPROVALS $ 50,000.00 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 141,907.81 EST. TOTAL $ 1,421,775.50 ROUNDED TOTAL $ 1,500,000.00 Figures REQUI T URN LANES REQUIRES TURN LANES r R E OPTION CTY ROAD 10 TO MEISTER ROAD (51 MPH CURVE) s 4 MEISTER ROAD o� MATC H EXISTING CENTERLINE i w Cl x R�qO UC 0 z o PEACHTREE Oo DEVELOPMENT z SEE B OPTIONS 0 J d' I-- Z Q CC Q REQUIRES TURN LANE 0 o o (if FY' ROAd 50 U C GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET S00 a SEAL PRIME CONSULTANT PROJECT TITLE SHEET TITLE COUNTY ROAD 10 OPTIONS OPTIONS A & C 50 MPH Wenck ,D ROW CITY OF CORCORAN, MN DWN BY CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE JULY 2014 .. OW. 0 —wtiV Eugimelryc, web Site: www.wenck.com CORCORAN, MN KOK HSL KCT SCALE AS SHOWN a unaiE aax, ux PROJECT N0. SHEET N0. REV N0. i REV REVISION DESCRIPTION I DWN APP REV DATE 2094 -24 C— Q 31 1 PEACHTREE DEVELOPMENT ACCESS OPTION 1A CTY ROAD 50 OPTION 131-A REVISION DESCRIPTION I DWN APP REV DATE EXISTING HOME 200' — — 200' SEAL PRIME CONSULTANT Wenck O W.—k As .mte Inc. Web Site: ....wenckcom C —wtlne E�m— AUPIE —ii, NN NOTES: • 50 MPH DESIGN SPEED • 120' WIDE R.O.W. PROJECT TITLE DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE CITY OF CORCORAN, MN CORCORAN, MN FOC 0 a 0 ry U 0 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET TITLE OPTION B1 OWN BY I CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE JULY 2014 KDK HSL KCT SCALE AS SHOWN PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. REV NO. 2094 -24 C -102A 3 OPTION 131-13 O- `2O 90 EXISTING HOME NOTES: • 50 MPH DESIGN SPEED • 120' WIDE R.O.W. L0U I LW { f I SEAL PRIME CONSULTANT Wenck OW.—k As .mte Inc. Web Site: ....wenckcom C —wting E�m— AUPIE PWN, NN PROJECT TITLE DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE CITY OF CORCORAN, MN C ORCORAN, MN REVISION DESCRIPTION DWN APP REV DATE FOC 0 a 0 U N 0 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET TITLE OPTION B1 WIN BY I CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE JULY 20 KDK HSL KCT SCALE AS SHOWN ROJECT NO. SHEET NO. REV 2094 -24 C -1028 ll I x \\" O �O OPTION 132 ., 1l \�C1�1�1��i•I�' \'�x REVISION DESCRIPTION DWN APP REV DATE 9 SEAL PEACHTREE DEVELOPMENT ACCESS OPTION 2 K ` ' \O ,7°° I PRIME CONSULTANT Wenck O Wenck As .mte Inc. Web Site: ....wenckcom con.wtlne e�mcer, AUPIE PWN, NN NOTES: • 30 MPH DESIGN SPEED • 120' R.O.W. EXISTING HOME PROJECT TITLE DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE CITY OF CORCORAN, MN CORCORAN, MN N 0 60 120 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET TITLE OPTION B2 WIN BY I CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE JULY 20 KDK HSL KCT SCALE AS SHOWN ROJECT NO. SHEET NO. REV 2094 -24 C -103 11 OPTION B3 'o r Ilk ';J I ai ...4p � o 0 200' 0 +00- I I \/J 200' 200' SEAL I 200' PEACHTREE DEVELOPMENT ACCESS OPTION 3 REVISION DESCRIPTION tDWNI APP REV DATE 100' NOTES: EXISTING HOME PRIME CONSULTANT PROJECT TITLE DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE Wen ce-k CITY OF CORCORAN, MN OWenck As .mte Inc. Web Site: ....wenckcom CORCORAN, MN con.wtlne e�mcer, AUPIE PWN, NN .z. a 0 Of U N 0 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET TITLE OPTION B3 WIN BY CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE JULY 20 KDK HSL KCT SCALE AS SHOWN ROJECT NO. SHEET NO. REV 2094 -24 C -104 200' 200' SEAL REVISION DESCRIPTION tDWNI APP REV DATE 100' NOTES: EXISTING HOME PRIME CONSULTANT PROJECT TITLE DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE Wen ce-k CITY OF CORCORAN, MN OWenck As .mte Inc. Web Site: ....wenckcom CORCORAN, MN con.wtlne e�mcer, AUPIE PWN, NN .z. a 0 Of U N 0 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET TITLE OPTION B3 WIN BY CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE JULY 20 KDK HSL KCT SCALE AS SHOWN ROJECT NO. SHEET NO. REV 2094 -24 C -104 d F 7 'o OPTION 134 PEACHTREE DEVELOPMENT ACCESS .OPTION 4 o i R,95 \ ,0 EXISTING HOME 6bw Ak CTY ROAD 50 \ ' CTY ROAD 50 a SEAL PRIME CONSULTANT Wenck OW-1, As .mte Inc. Web Site: ....wenckcom Co wting e�mcer, AUPIE PWN, NN REVISION DESCRIPTION OWN APP REV DATE NOTES: • ROUND -ABOUT SHOWN AS A 190' INSCRIBED DIAMETER • POTENTIAL LOW END IS 130' INSCRIBED DIAMETER PROJECT TITLE INTERSECTION REALIGNMENT CITY OF CORCORAN, MN CORCORAN, MN 0 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET HEET TITLE OPTION B4 WIN BY CHK'D APP'D DWG DATE JULY 2014 KDK HSL KCT SCALE AS SHOWN ROJECT NO. SHEET NO. REV NO. 2094 -24 C -105 Appendix A Peachtree Concept Entrance to 50 Classification Figure Traffic Counts Zoning & Lot Information Current Zoning - RMF -3 High Density Residential Proposed Zoning - PUD Planned Unit Development Proposed Minimum Lot Widths = 55',65',75' Proposed Minimum Lot Depth - 120' Proposed Lot Setbacks Front = 25' Side = 5' and 10' Rear = 30' Proposed Townhome Setbacks Front = 20' Side = 20' Rear = 30' Between Townhome Structure = 20' Proposed Right -of -way = 50' Gross Density Property Area = 103.3 acres 55' Wide Lots = 75 65' Wide Lots = 93 75' Wide Lots = 70 Proposed Number of Lots = 226 Proposed Number of Townhomes = 23 249 Total Residential Units Gross Density = 2.4 units /acre Net Density Property Area = 103.3 acres Wetlands Not Impacted by Development = 10 ac Wetland Buffer Not Impacted by Development = 4.34 ac Flood Plain without Wetlands and Buffer = 1.25 ac Ponds In Open Space = 2.2 ac Right -of -way = 15.6 ac 30' Wide Trail Easement = 3.6 ac Net Developable Acreage = 66.3 ac Net Density = 3.76 units /acre Schendel - PUD Sketch Plan - 06.03.2014 - `....... ■...... _, .-. 1-O U N C AL, W t U } N LEGEND 55' Wide Residential Lot a `- 65' Wide Residential Lot 75' Wide Residential Lot TOwnhorne (Southeast Parcel) Flood Plain L�"-11 Wetland Open Space _ Sidewalk Trail .............. Future Trail (3 Stantec J " °` 109th Ave N Ja r La � c � J sun set to Rush Meadow La Co try Cir E 0 Dr Proposed as Part o a a i NW Hennepin Study Country Rd c �■�■■�■■�■■ � Oakdale Dr Rush C Stieg;:Rd� u Dassel-L-a m 1 Me dow Creek.Dr d S Darrel.La MeadowvieJDr �i `m p Hidden Ponds Dr Hillside_Dr 1 Tessmer_Rd ,.� °' � �a+n ,1.01st.Ave ♦A� v w 'a Hunte`s Ridge 0 m £ ! Rush Cre v r £ i e c a /o m Oswa% ■ ■ ■ ■r�iy ■ ■ ■■■■■ �� ®1 J_9f7thAve]N�, 11 ! (C • ! o I� I � I d Hill La c • gunny —; 95th.Ave Proposed as Part of ° C "i NW Hennepin Study ik Patrick PI LL Mystique Dr Woodland Tr County Hwy 10 93rdrAve ■N Proposed as Part of 1 I` ♦♦ NW Hennepin Study w '® Id ♦♦ o 1 �LL ♦ ♦���������Schutt Farm ,Rd Im` w ft LIJ z W 1 a I Schutte Rd c I(I LL Garrison Rd d �j < O T m 1 Larson -Rd— U p � 1 � d - c Salem.La' > ` _ Meister Rd_ Strgehler +Rd m _Cain_P_I 1 ! = GOOSE ♦� Julie Ann Dr ! m LAKF�� 1 � � s�� � R�SNCR ♦•. ��1'stP_t _ oh7ee FFK n 1 81st p - a %mob Ry 1 ' 3 ! Ridge Rd f= m 1 ! 0a 1 1 ! U IWO U Av-- Park Tr � County, wy 50 - �' w d it '9 Auger Ave £ Em -COOK 0 I� - LAKE 1 75th Ave N 1 1 Lark,ipjR,dA4&& F' a c Y Abilene La d SCOTT Homestead Tr c m - LAK °o �N 70th Ave N 0 _ ' Nystrom La m JUBERT Oj� I 7 1 LAKE " ° sdi Olde Sturbridge Rd v Lakeview Cir a e ♦ a oee�rr 0 Horseshoe Tr + ♦• ( <a��a ♦� 66th Ve,N, Gleason Rd 1 MORIN I` v y V, p LAKE: ° F �£ w 3 Wagon Wheel La c 0 63rd Ave N `m State Hwy 55 �■■ ■ �■■ � ■■�■■�■■�■■�- a■.■■.■■.■■.■■.■■. ■�■■�■■�■■�■■�■■ � HackamoreRd Figure 16 cityRCORAN 2030 Roadway Functional Classification 2030 Comprehensive Plan N S 3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet 2030 Roadway Functional Classification: Principal Arterial A Minor Reliever A Minor Expander Proposed A Minor Expander A Minor Connector ■ ■ ■■ Proposed A Minor Connector Major Collector Proposed Major Collector Minor Collector Proposed Minor Collector Local Street ■ ■� ■ ■j City Limit Open Water Updated April 2014 Adopted June 2011 I^ C 1 1 1 1 1 1 Garrison Rd O N L0 0 CG O r O N n 11,600 1 I . �... 13,60 J 1230 ,0 Rush Meadow La N U_ z j .a j 1 Rio• .a 3 Sunset�a LL O 1 mJ LAKE�� .; Dr � 1 N passel +a e� -Salem -La' 1 Q. O_akd_ le Dr J Hidden Ponds Dr i RushC Ann Dr 1 Meadow C.re.ek,D.r Meadowview Drs m Y � � 1 1 i� ea o0 O Hunters O 1 0� f' 7,800 -Rebecca 11.ark -Tr O 1 � .— Tessmer_Rd O j o r 1 ,10 A•ve -N p 0 18,000 O 8 m Y �.-- -Y Abilene La jRush Creo � � •£ 1 O 70th Ave N c r E Orl. a y c9 AMy.fique!61t' 8,650 d � 1 co n�nM .. =n =n =.. =n =.u..�n�n�..�n�n� ...........Nome 1 -moo i 4,400 I^ C 1 1 1 1 1 1 Garrison Rd O N L0 0 CG O r O N n 11,600 1 I 0 J 1 J w Rush Meadow La N U_ z j .a w � 1 Rio• _Cain_P_I p Cy LL O 1 r LAKE�� .; H � 1 N passel +a St�e9 -Salem -La' Darcel.La ' Hidden Ponds Dr Julie Ann Dr 1 Hillside-Dr Y � � 1 1.01.st.Ave i� o o0 O Hunters O 1 0� f' 7,800 -Rebecca 11.ark -Tr O 1 � M O j o r 97th- ,10 A•ve -N p I^ C 1 1 1 1 1 1 Garrison Rd O N L0 0 CG O r O N n H Y_ 1 H O t O c O 3 470 1,180 a iv d )J� SCOTT HomesTaad Tr Rd v 11,600 Jackie La 10,000 I U J Rush Meadow La N c Co try try Cir E .a m Rio• _Cain_P_I p Cy n Country Rd to LAKE�� .; Stieg_Rd Y 300 fm N passel +a St�e9 Darcel.La f� d Hidden Ponds Dr O Q o 8 � 0 m Hillside-Dr Y � � � 0 1.01.st.Ave i� O w 9,000 N o0 d �, Hunters Ridge O u heQr Tr N '`SOS LAKE E O 1 � M 1,660 15,700 oswala 17,400 4 r 97th- ,10 A•ve -N p 0 18,000 O 8 m Y �.-- -Y Abilene La gunny Hill La � m •Ave o 70th Ave N > T Patrick PI s' AMy.fique!61t' w.e - N d � H,w 55 Y H Y_ 1 H O t O c O 3 470 1,180 a iv d )J� SCOTT HomesTaad Tr Rd v j I U LL 1 O n • .a m Rio• _Cain_P_I Meister Rd 12 GOOSE'w� LAKE�� .; r .: N ti 8$st RFFK .�..1 81st P. C O Q o 8 � j ttidge Rd tt r m ®® M o O � 0 I j O v O w 9,000 N Id 1 • d �, Auger Ave E _ ?S fa COOK heQr Tr '`SOS LAKE �o 75th Ave N 1 Larkin -Rd 2,000 1,660 15,700 Horseshoe Tr 340 MORIN r p LAKE o 8 m Y �.-- -Y Abilene La iL r 0 m o 70th Ave N > T 0 \I 0 U O O M 63rd T_ %d Rd O O O O r Figure 22 E City of CORCORAN 2030 Average Daily Traffic Volume Forecasts (ADT) 2030 Comprehensive Plan N W 1�6�E \, t,, S 3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet 12,300 Hennepin County 2030 ADT Forecasts 12,300 2030 ADT Forecasts Road Centerline �..�..j City Limit Open Water *2030 forecast does not take into consideration proposed realignments the City is considering. October 7, 2009 Ar Bonestroo I:/ 504 /50408144 /GIS /ComPlan /Maps /2030 ADT.mxd / I Nystrom La JUBERT .a Rio• sofb LAKE N ti C c `� ^s Nos c 9� pio Lakeview Cir a o heQr Tr c G,�8o d a� Co Horseshoe Tr 340 MORIN r p LAKE o iL Wagon Wheel La o s' 26 000 d State H,w 55 Y n�nM .. =n =n =.. =n =.u..�n�n�..�n�n� ...........Nome 0 \I 0 U O O M 63rd T_ %d Rd O O O O r Figure 22 E City of CORCORAN 2030 Average Daily Traffic Volume Forecasts (ADT) 2030 Comprehensive Plan N W 1�6�E \, t,, S 3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet 12,300 Hennepin County 2030 ADT Forecasts 12,300 2030 ADT Forecasts Road Centerline �..�..j City Limit Open Water *2030 forecast does not take into consideration proposed realignments the City is considering. October 7, 2009 Ar Bonestroo I:/ 504 /50408144 /GIS /ComPlan /Maps /2030 ADT.mxd Appendix B County 10 Turn Back Memo �A`Wlenck Engineers • Scientists Business Professionals ENGINEER'S MEMORANDUM TO: Brad Martens, City Administrator FROM: Kent Torve, P.E. and Heather Libby, P.E. DATE: July 3, 2014 SUBJECT: County Road 10 Turnback Background Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0249 (800) 472 -2232 (763) 479 -4200 Fax (763) 479 -4242 wenckmp @wenck.com www.wenck.com This memo presents basic information on a turnback and the costs associated with future maintenance and some benefits for future development. Turnback Length The City operates 102 miles of roads, of which 25 are paved (information taken from Dust Control presentation). The potential turnback of County Road 10 from County Road 19 to County Road 50 is approximately 5.0 miles (Figure 1). The road is currently a 24 -foot wide rural section roadway. Developments Currently the County reviews all developments through its access permit process for impacts to the regional system. This review ranges from single access to homes, 40 -acre and 4 lot splits, to large developments (Lennar /Peachtree). The County reviews impact studies and typically requests additional ROW and comments from the City during development approval process. If the turnback occurred, the review by the County would not be necessary. County History of Maintenance The following text was received from the County's Road and Bridge Operations Division. This section of roadway, was last overlayed in 2003. Generally our overlays have lasted between 12 and 15 years. The 2013 Present Serviceability Rating (PSR), or ride rating, is 3.14. Our current practice is to place a roadway onto the overlay candidates list once the PSR drops below 2.5. C:\ Users \TorKC0063 \Documents \Corcoran Offs ite \2_DeveIopment Projects \2_Schendel \county 10 turnback memo Thursday.docx Based on the above information 1 would estimate that the next overlay would not happen until 2016 or 2017 at the earliest. Maintenance Costs Below is a summary of the potential maintenance costs associated with maintaining five additional miles of roadway: Item Frequency Cost /mi —Cost for 5 mi Crack Repair annual $1,000 $5,000 Striping annual $1,000 $5,000 Mill /overlay every 12 -15 years $150,000 $750,000 Reconstruct every 30 years $ 1,600,000 $8,000,000 Seal coating is used in certain areas of the state on high speed roads. This may be an option for CR10 as a City road in years 7 and 14 to reduce maintenance costs, and are estimated at $40,000 /mile or $200,000 for 5 miles and delays the mill /overlay to a 20 year frequency. Process for Turnback CR 10 is currently listed on the County's turnback plan, where the County wants to divest itself of selected roads throughout the County. Timing will be based on City request, and Corcoran has had a more recent turnback with "half" of Old CR 101 near Lions Park being turned back to Maple Grove and Corcoran. The reimbursement to the City was estimated, and cash was given to the Cities in lieu of overlay. Specific negotiations do occur on segments that benefit both parties. County Feedback on January Inquiry The County's answers to selected questions from January of 2014 are attached in email from Jim Grube of Hennepin County. C:\ Users \TorKC0063 \Documents \Corcoran Offs ite \2_DeveIopment Projects \2_schendel \county 10 turnback memo Thursday.dou TIF DISTRICT STUDY Wenck JUNE 2014 Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center County Road 10 Turnback Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 Figure 1 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 Email Attachment Kent C. Torve Subject: FW: follow up from January 21st meeting From: James Grube [ mailto :James.Grube(a@hennepin.us] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 3:40 PM To: Brad Martens Cc: Brian Langseth; Craig Twinem; Gregory M. Chock; Harlan Hanson; Jay R Baldwin; Thomas D. Johnson Subject: RE: follow up from January 21st meeting Mr. Mertens, I offer that the information provided below within the email you have sent me is my attempt to meet the city's desire. It does not constitute the final Hennepin County position on the series of questions tendered below. The responses are offered to help further discussion of the implications of decision making. I consider emails to be an alternative to official communication and the city needs to recognize that the short response time that you have given the county for such leaves me uncomfortable with any assumption of official status. This exchange has not been vetted with either Hennepin County administration or Hennepin County Commissioner Jeff Johnson. With that in mind please know we will do whatever we can at the staff level to help the city as it strives to make important and meaningful long term decisions. Jim Grube, P.E. Director, Transportation Department, and County Engineer Hennepin County 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 Office: 612 - 596 -0305 Cell: 612 -250 -2615 James.grube @hennepin.us From: bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:29 PM To: James Grube Cc: Carla J Stueve; Ken Guenthner (ken guenthnerlaw.com); ktorve@wenck.com Subject: follow up from January 21st meeting Mr. Grube, This email is in follow up to a meeting on February 21, 2014 in which the City of Corcoran requested information from Hennepin County regarding proposed alignment changes to County Road 10. The City appreciated the opportunity to discuss this opportunity to make changes to the transportation system within the City of Corcoran to improve safety as well as to meet our long -term transportation needs. As stated at the meeting, the City is currently reviewing two proposed projects near the County Road 10 /County Road 50 intersection. The County and the City are well aware that this intersection is less than ideal in its current alignment and would prefer to make improvements to the transportation system in this area. The two projects moving forward provide a window of opportunity to make the change at this time in order to avoid further challenges in the future. To that end the City is requesting that you respond to the below questions regarding three scenarios in order for the City to best use this opportunity to improve transportation the betterment of the City of Corcoran and Hennepin County. It is important that a response be received by Tuesday, March 11th as the City will discuss the information from the response at a March 13th strategic planning workshop. A response via email, letter, or a personal meeting is fine. Scenario #1: County Road 10 is realigned along Meister Road and is "turned back" to the City of Corcoran from County Road 19 to County Road 116 upon completion as a local road. If this were to take place please answer the following: 1. Is the County in favor of this scenario? County staff supports the turnback of County Road 10 to the city. This is stated in the county's Transportation Systems Plan. Thus if Meister Road becomes the main connection to County Road 116 the county offers no comment on how Meister Road is configured since it would remain a city street. 2. Does the County have a requirement of any standard of road construction? The county does not have design requirements for local streets. 3. What infrastructure would be required at the intersection of the new road and County Road 116? a. Turn lanes on the new road. b. Turn lanes on County Road 116. Southbound right turn land and northbound left turn lane. c. Traffic control devices. Any traffic control devices would need to meet required warrants in accordance with the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD), and be justified as outlined in the county's Cost Participation Policy. d. Other. 4. What role would the County play in the project? a. County takes the lead. b. City takes the lead with County approval. If the outcome is that there is no county road between County Roads 19 and 50, the county would see itself in a support role, essentially looking at the intersections of County Roads 19 and 116. 5. What would the County contribute to the project? The county has traditionally either provided a pavement overlay of the roadway to be turned back to a city, or if desired, the cash equivalent of the overlay. a. Financial assistance in the new construction. The county does not normally provide such assistance when the work occurs on a city street. b. Financial assistance for the City taking on the roadway for the County. As noted above, the value of an overlay. c. Financial assistance to abandon the now unused roadway. See above. d. Design assistance. Not in this case. e. Other. 6. If this option is accepted what is a logical timeline for project completion? If the city was willing to accept either the overlay of County Road 10 or the cash equivalent for accepting it into its local system, the reversion could occur in 2014, if supported by the County Board. If there is a desire for a different arrangement, serious discussions relative to the city's position on financial assistance would need to occur. Scenario #2: County Road 10 is realigned along Meister Road but continues to be a County Road. If this were to take place please answer the following: 1. Is the County in favor of this scenario? This scenario is not preferred by county staff. 2. Does the County have a requirement of any standard of road construction? If the realignment of County Road 10 along Meister Road occurs, the new county road would have to be designed to state aid standards. 3. What infrastructure would be required at the intersection of the new road and County Road 116? See the response offered under scenario #1. a. Turn lanes on the new road. a b. Turn lanes on County Road 116. c. Traffic control devices. d. Other. 4. What role would the County play in the project? a. County takes the lead. b. City takes the lead with County approval. The county's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is over - programmed, with no staff resources available for at least 5 to 7 years, if such a project is deemed worthy of inclusion in the CIP by the County Board. 5. What would the County contribute to the project? To provide any financial assistance beyond the value of an overlay of the existing County Road 10 segment, a proposed project would have to compete for funding through the county's CIP evaluation process. a. Financial assistance in the new construction. b. Financial assistance for the City taking on the roadway for the County. c. Financial assistance to abandon the now unused roadway. d. Design assistance. e. Other. 6. If this option is accepted what is a logical timeline for project completion? As noted above the county's CIP is over - programmed with an approximate 7 to 10 year wait for supported projects to be funded. Scenario #3: County Road 10 continues to connect with County Road 50 however the alignment is changed to "T" up to County Road 50. If this were to take place please answer the following: 1. Is the County in favor of this scenario? This is the second choice of county staff, if the long term vision of County Road 10 turnback is not viable in the opinion of the City Council. 2. Does the County have a requirement of any standard of road construction? The design would have to meet state aid standards. 3. What infrastructure would be required at the intersection of the new road and County Road 116? Please refer to scenario #1 if Meister Road is to develop as a city collector street and to intersect with 116. a. Turn lanes on the new road. b. Turn lanes on County Road 116. c. Traffic control devices. d. Other. 4. What role would the County play in the project? a. County takes the lead. b. City takes the lead with County approval. See the answer of this question for scenario #2. 5. What would the County contribute to the project? This type of project would also need to compete for CIP funding, just as I note above. a. Financial assistance in the new construction. b. Financial assistance for the City taking on the roadway for the County. c. Financial assistance to abandon the now unused roadway. d. Design assistance. e. Other. 7. If this option is accepted what is a logical timeline for project completion? As noted above the county's CIP is over - programmed with an approximate 7 to 10 year wait for supported projects to be funded. 3 6. If a residential neighborhood were developed along the existing CR 10 alignment would the 30 mph speed limit be extended to the extent of the neighborhood? While we recognize the desire to reduce traffic speeds, a speed reduction would be post development, not pre - development if you will. This probably needs a bit more conversation because County Road 10 is an arterial, not a neighborhood street. In addition to answering the above questions the City is interested in learning what the maintenance plan is for County Road 10 within the City of Corcoran. Please provide this information in your response. There is not an extraordinary plan for County Road 10. It would receive an overlay when needed with crack sealing shortly thereafter to support the investment. We do not have immediate plans for sidewalk or off road trails, either. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance. Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions. If there are challenges in answering all of the questions in the timeframe above please send anything you have instead of waiting for all of the answers to come together. Sincerely, Brad Martens City Administrator City of Corcoran 763 - 400 -7030 www.ci.corcoran.mn.us Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney - client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. Appendix C Traffic Analysis AM PEAK HOUR �, f X7:00 - 8 :00 AM) -. V Y einc k S) '—'27/64 4 '(- 72179 CR 50 115 �+ 234 {258 t PM PEAK HOUR (4 :30 - 5:30 PM) r � t- 3531512 y <- 2611288 CR 50 1114 1221135 FEASIBILITY STUDY � I+ nck FOR PEACHTREE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Engineers • Scientists IN CORCORAN, MN CR 10 2114 2119 WITH BUILD-OUT XXIXX cQ r uo a -17119 cfl r— <_ 70/97 � 14 ,F— 19121 17/25 oo 3451445 —> cj 1581216_7 mnT � 1 rLnCo N (o r CR 10 2114 2119 WITH BUILD-OUT XXIXX FIGURE 1 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENT VOLUMES -� a 88197 rl- �D <— 3281432 15118 36152 �• CR 10 0 1251180 - +� 5[1172 � 0r» ni T Q FIGURE 1 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENT VOLUMES - �Wenck Engineers • Scientists Business Professionals Wenck File #2294 -24 July 2014 I X Service strate is Advice technicai Excellence Utility Feasibility study Peachtree Development Prepared for: THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ ............................1 -1 2.0 SEWER .......................................................................................... ............................2 -1 2.1 Alignment And Lift Station ...................................................... ............................2 -1 2.2 Connections ............................................................................ ............................2 -1 2.3 Force Main Alternatives And Costs ......................................... ............................2 -1 3.0 WATER ......................................................................................... ............................3 -1 3.1 Trunk System .......................................................................... ............................3 -1 3.2 Looping And Connections ....................................................... ............................3 -1 3.3 Modeling ................................................................................. ............................3 -1 3.4 Costs ........................................................................................ ............................3 -2 4.0 FINANCING AND NEXT STEPS ........................................................ ............................4 -1 4.1 Background ............................................................................. ............................4 -1 4.2 Methods .................................................................................. ............................4 -1 4.3 Next Steps ............................................................................... ............................4 -2 TABLES 1 Off -Site Costs for Sewer and Water FIGURES 1 Sewer Alignments and Force Main Route Alternatives 2 Water Looping and Connection Points APPENDICES Appendix A: Sewer and Water Trunk Systems from Comprehensive Plan Appendix B: Downtown Feasibility Study for Gravity Sewer (April 2012) T: \2294- Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study \utility feasibility study \Utility Feasibility Study.dou i July 2014 — ,AWenck 1.0 Introduction Peachtree Properties is proposing a development near the "10 -50" intersection in Corcoran on property known as the Schendel property. Three feasibility studies are being completed for the project and they involve transportation, utilities and stormwater. This report looks specifically at the feasibility of providing trunk sewer and water service to the proposed development. Contained in the report is the sanitary sewer and water main options for the trunk system that is consistent with the overall City utility plans. Financing options of the development infrastructure will be further detailed as the project moves forward. For guidance, the City has recently followed the following financial procedures: • Off -site utility extensions may require developer cash contribution • Off -site utility extension costs may be shared with City utility bond contributions • The City manages permitting, easements, design and construction of off -site utilities • Trunk Line Area Charges (TLAC) may still be required if cash for off -site facilities is provided • Credit towards TLAC is given for oversizing and over depth costs of trunk utilities on site. Cost breakdown is given in Table 1. 1 -1 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study \utility feasibility study \Utility Feasibility Study.dou July 2014 Yr >,,'1 1lrE'nCk 2.0 Sewer 2.1 ALIGNMENT AND LIFT STATION The City's sewer trunk system also serves the Peachtree Development as conceptually shown on Figure 1. The alignment includes installation of a lift station on the north end of Peachtree's development and force main to the existing manhole connection near the church at CR 116/CR 10 Intersection. The lift station will be located in the natural low point of the property in coordination with the development layout. The tributary area to the lift station is comprised of the proposed development as well as a future gravity sewer system to be installed in the downtown area south of County Road 10. Ultimate development will require the lift station to be taken "off line" and a new lift station constructed at City Hall to pump sewage to the north. This will be ultimately required to route sewage away from the Elm Creek Interceptor since it is currently oversubscribed according to MCES. 2.2 CONNECTIONS Sewer will be required to be "stubbed" to serve the south and southwest in accordance to the trunk system plans (Appendix A). These stubs will be located during the design phase of the project, however for the purposes of this report it can be assumed a southerly connection to serve the City Park and Downtown will be constructed under CR 10. The City would construct a separate project to connect Downtown and the City Park with the gravity system through Schendel. 2.3 FORCE MAIN ALTERNATIVES AND COSTS The development is important to the overall system, however for Peachtree to develop there appears to be only one discussion item discharge of sewer system —the route of the forcemain from the development to the Church manhole along CR 116. Costs are given in Table 1. Option A as shown on Figure 1 will take the forcemain from the lift station directly east to CR 116, south along CR 116 to the Church manhole. A complicating factor is the route requires easement to the east and easement to the south along CR 116. Cost for Option A-- $475,000 Unit cost = $153/LF, similar to Lions Park project 2 -1 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study \utility feasibility study \Utility Feasibility Study.dou July � 2014 zu�YV j�e n ck Option B will utilize the internal street network to bring the forcemain south, then east along sideyards to CR 116. This route shortens the off -site easement work necessary, and therefore appears less expensive for off -site costs. Cost for Option B-- $315,000 Unit cost = $190 /LF Unit cost increases from Option A due to smaller project, more sideyard easements, etc. 2 -2 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study \utility feasibility study \Utility Feasibility Study.dou July 2014 Yr >,,'1 1lrE'nCk 3.0 Water 3.1 TRUNK SYSTEM The City's water trunk system is nearby at the corner of CR 116 and CR 10. The ultimate system includes connections to the west and north along CR 116. A booster station is planned within the next few years (located at the Maple Grove border) to boost pressure within Corcoran. 3.2 LOOPING AND CONNECTIONS The development will be required to provide looping, which allows for water service to be maintained while under maintenance or repair. The looping required is at the north end of the development at CR 116, and at the south end where it will be connected to the City Park trunk line that also extends from the Downtown area. Figure 2 shows route along the west side of CR 116, which may or may not be shared with sewer force main. 3.3 MODELING Computer modeling was performed to estimate the water availability to the proposed development that included the existing 24" and 12" pipeline from the connection point to Maple Groves' water distribution system near the intersection of CR10 and CR101. The purpose of this analysis was to estimate the water systems ability to provide adequate water and fire protection to the proposed subdivision. New pipe was added to the end of the existing pipe at CR 116 and continued north along CR 116 then continued west for a distance of approximately 1,100 lineal feet to a point inside the proposed development and would "dead end" (i.e. no looping of distribution piping was assumed to begin the development). Demands The water use demands were peak day demands and were estimated at 1,140 gallons per day (GPD) per house. The modeling assumes that the beginning water pressure at the intersection of CR10 and CR101 was approximately 50 psi and it was also assumed that the highest elevation within the new development to be served was 980 feet above sea level. Another assumption was that the Lennar development would consist of 300 homes during the modeling analyses. It is anticipated that the ultimate supply will be for 250 homes at full buildout. No other water use demands were placed on the distribution system. The model runs with WaterCAD were phased to review the water pressure as development progresses. The analyses included model runs to determine pressures at no new development, 50 new homes, 100 new homes, 150 new homes, 200 new homes and 250 homes; each with a 1,500 gpm fire flow demand and without the fire flow. The table below shows the resulting pressure at the end of the proposed pipe 3 -1 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study \utility feasibility study \Utility Feasibility Study.dou July 201/4 �j to represent the pressure available to the new development. This table shows the pressure available with and without the 1,500 gpm fire flow. Number of Homes Pressure at Peak Day Demand (psi) Pressure with 1,500 gpm Fire Flow (psi) 0 47.6 26 50 47.6 24.9 100 47.5 23.8 150 47.4 22.7 200 47.3 21.6 250 47.1 20.4 Conclusion The results of the model analyses indicate that the water system as described can provide adequate water and fire flow to the proposed development, which will improve as the City constructs a looped system further south to tie into Lennar's west end. 3.4 COSTS Costs for the CR 116 northerly extension as shown on Figure 1 are given in Table 1. Cost for water main -- $485,000 Unit cost = $155/1-F, similar to Lions Park project 3 -2 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study \utility feasibility study \Utility Feasibility Study.dou July 2014 Yr >,,'1 1lrE'nCk 4.0 Financing and Next Steps 4.1 BACKGROUND The City has created area and connection charges for the development area, as documented in the "Regional Development Study, September 2013 ". The study included costs of: • Water mains • Water booster station o This is a permanent structure to boost pressure for development and eventually to the Downtown water tower. • Water Towers • Sewer trunk lines, and • Sewer lift stations Transportation was included in the study also, however these costs are implemented on a sub district /impact basis as development occurs. The Peachtree impacts are for CR 10 and the CR 10 /CR 50 intersection. 4.2 METHODS As noted in the introduction to this report, financing options of the development infrastructure will be further detailed as the project moves forward, however the developer needs to make a decision at some point on the viability of the project. Therefore for guidance, the City has recently followed these funding procedures: nffcita I Itilitioc • Off -site utility extensions may require developer cash contribution • This would bean option for the CR 116 water main • This would bean option for the sewer force main leaving the Peachtree development • Off -site utility extension costs may be shared or covered by City utility bond contributions o The cost for water main along CR 116 could be included in the upcoming City project which will install a booster station at the Maple Grove border, and extend water main from the CR 10 /CR 116 intersection to the west end of Lennar development. 4 -1 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study \utility feasibility study \Utility Feasibility Study.dou July 2014 $" „Wenck Area and Connection Charges • Trunk Line Area Charges (TLAC) allow the City to recoup offsite trunk costs, and may still be required if cash for off -site facilities is provided • Credit towards TLAC is given for oversizing and over depth costs of trunk utilities on site. Property and Construction Management • The City is responsible for permitting, easements, design and construction of off -site utilities. 4.3 NEXT STEPS The project financials will be clarified as the applicant continues on the City process. The financial next steps for utilities are to: Update the TLAC costs per buildable acre, since construction bids (actual costs) are available for portions of the SE Area trunk system. The intent of the City is to maintain a forward looking area charge (TLAC) system, and as portions of the system are built out, to update the analysis to represent the remaining system costs. This will include: • Insert project costs on Lions Park Sewer and CR 101 Water Main such as recent easement costs and actual bid costs • Remove a portion of the system that will be installed by Lennar and insert the amount of TLAC credit applied to Lennar • Review the "buildable acre" portion of the study to represent market conditions. ■ Update the pipe unit costs (per linear foot). Re- execute the Multi -Year Financial Management Plan Report for review by Council and determine potential impacts to the City should market conditions change. The current version of the 5 -Year Financial Plan includes $1.4M for a water booster station and water main connecting the CR 10/ CR 116 intersection with the west side of Lennar. This could be increased in scope to include the Peachtree water main along CR 116. 4 -2 T:\ 2294 - Corcoran \24 - Peachtree \Feasibility Study \utility feasibility study \Utility Feasibility Study.dou July 2014 0 r >,,'1 1lrE'nCk Tables Off -Site Costs for Sewer and Water Table 1. Off -Site Costs for Sewer and Water Peachtree Development WATERMAIN COSTS ITEM UNITS QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 CLEARING GRUBBING ACRE 1.4 $ 8,000.00 $ 11,200.00 12" WATERMAIN - DIRECTIONAL DRILL LF 3100 $ 70.00 $ 217,000.00 6" DIP WATERMAIN LF 80 $ 60.00 $ 4,800.00 HYDRANT & VALVE EACH 4 $ 5,000.00 $ 20,000.00 12" - 45 DEGREE BEND EACH 2 $ 3,500.00 $ 7,000.00 12" X 6" TEE EACH 4 $ 2,000.00 $ 8,000.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION ACRE 1.4 $ 45,000.00 $ 63,000.00 SUBTOTAL $ 358,500.00 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 71,700.00 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 53,775.00 EST. TOTAL $ 483,975.00 ROUNDED VALUE $ 485,000.00 FORCEMAIN SEWER COSTS - OPTION A ITEM UNITS QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 CLEARING GRUBBING ACRE 0.7 $ 8,000.00 $ 5,600.00 8" FORCEMAIN - DIRECTIONAL DRILL LF 3100 $ 80.00 $ 248,000.00 4' DIA SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 6' DIA AIR RELEASE MANHOLE W/ VALVE EACH 2 $ 15,000.00 $ 30,000.00 CONNECT EXISTING SEWER PIPE TO STRUCTURE EACH 1 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 8" 45 DEGREE BEND EACH 2 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION ACRE 0.7 $ 45,000.00 $ 31,500.00 SUBTOTAL $ 351,100.00 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 70,220.00 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 52,665.00 EST. TOTAL $ 473,985.00 ROUNDED VALUE $ 475,000.00 FORCEMAIN SEWER COSTS - OPTION B ITEM UNITS QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP 1 $ 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP 1 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 CLEARING GRUBBING ACRE 1.0 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 8" FORCEMAIN - DIRECTIONAL DRILL LF 1650 $ 80.00 $ 132,000.00 4' DIA SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 6' DIA AIR RELEASE MANHOLE W/ VALVE EACH 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 CONNECT EXISTING SEWER PIPE TO STRUCTURE EACH 1 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 8" 45 DEGREE BEND EACH 2 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION ACRE 1.0 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 SUBTOTAL $ 230,500.00 CONTINGENCY (20 %) $ 46,100.00 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 34,575.00 EST. TOTAL $ 311,175.00 ROUNDED VALUE $ 3155000.00 Figures Sewer Alignments and Force Main Route Alternatives Water Looping and Connection Points CITY OF CORCORAN Wenck JULY 2014 Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Proposed Development Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 Figure 1 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 CITY OF CORCORAN Wenck JULY 2014 Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Proposed Development Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 Figure 1 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 Appendix A Sewer and Water Trunk Systems i T ' i CORCOR��N F F— • SE -AF 2030 Comprehensive Plan SE- AQ i Trunk Sanitary Sewer SE Area SEAS Figure 26 SE -32 SE .ao SE -3 "1 II - 2 SE- SE -14 � SE -A SE -13 SE -C SE -11 —, • Sewer Node ► Forcemain 21 SE -H SE -M ► Gravity Sewer �� 2 SE -9 SE -10 8^ -F E- 3 SE -15 10 0 1• u MCES Interceptor = Sewer Subdistricts E co SE -G SE -N SE -20 SE -6 �8'SE =5 SE City Limit Parcel Parcel Base Map SE - 18., SE -19 • I. SEJ SE -AM SE -P E -3 �,_ LLLLLL N 15 •, SE-4 12 SE -18 H W. E SE -2 . 5E -17 • S 2 S Feet E- 0 2000 SE -1 Fugure Connection To SE U SE -Y SE Elm Crreek Interceptor r _ SE-W FIV=, SE-22 0 ri SE -AY S -AB SE -AC I SE - 23 SE -AV AA SE -24 ^SE -26 SE -28 SE =29 0 AU SE i I _.._.._. �- — .................. � SE -30 SE- S - SE -25 -27 SE SE A kG E- sw.%,la Lj \ i j� Bonestroo April 2009 v^ - is \504 \50408143 \gis \se sanitary map.mxd 6 C c u -°i 'c 1 1 Meadow-Creek 1 1 W5.odland 1 1 0 J 1 W W z j � 1 o j H � 1 _Salem_La, Ju 1 i �R�becca_P_a 1 1 1 1 ■IMEE■ Sunset Oakd I _ Rush R J iew Dr r �_ d ° Ion Y` � F n \l, c"y I j U- ci 1 0 c T 1 ~ e�Rd Meister Rd .2 r� � _Cain_P_I _ ; GOOSE w• as a LAKE` sf� R� cR �• BAN 8,psr. pt o��@.• FFk r....l 81seel- attidge Rd F F 0 o • ounty.Hw.y_5A �' - d x LU �m Auge�rr Ave E Em • j COOK Y ■ 1 ' _ j LAKE f 75th Ave N r 3 ■ L- rkin Rd -- - F- E oL`v �Y Abilene La SCOTT Homestead Tr ■ LAK ■ a 31 70th Av N ■ z Nystrom La m X 1 JUBERT �• .ot LAKE c ire ■ Old -ur ridge Rd �� ,'mid' = s;A ■ `° . Lakeview Cir a o,' ■ s ■ o _� a���a' ■ 1 fD Horseshoe Tr - ■ S< T 66th- Gleason Rd to ■�� ■ ■��c V m m - 'o r j p l MAKE L I3 �s �W v 0 o r on heel La - h o 63rd Ave N di d ckamors-RdL— =I j NINSIBININ 111111@11111.4 1111 INININI me IIII NIMBI IIII Isso NIMBI NNoI I= memo milmommel, 1=11,00810ppo 10=1161ARY. -f Potential Water Tower Locations Q Potential Supply Connections with Neighboring Communities ■��� Future Trunk Watermain Future Well Exploration Areas 2030 Service Boundary City Limit Open Water Wetlands October 7, 2009 Ar Bonestroo I:/ 504 / 50408144 /GIS /ComPlan /Maps /trunk water system.mxd Rush Meadow La Country Cir E j o n. CountrybRd, M 0 0 rc _ T ■ Stieg.Rd F ■ o Y �O DasselrL-a freSRQ Darcel.La ■ Hidden Ponds Dr l m HI II I, Dr j Y j 1.01.st.Ave _ Hunters "o Ridge ■ 1 ■ - Oswa ■■� 97th ■ A•ve -N- j 77 LT 81 ■ d ■ 1 Sunny Hill La � ■ �n ;,PAve I � I o Pat Lick Chi Y c"y I j U- ci 1 0 c T 1 ~ e�Rd Meister Rd .2 r� � _Cain_P_I _ ; GOOSE w• as a LAKE` sf� R� cR �• BAN 8,psr. pt o��@.• FFk r....l 81seel- attidge Rd F F 0 o • ounty.Hw.y_5A �' - d x LU �m Auge�rr Ave E Em • j COOK Y ■ 1 ' _ j LAKE f 75th Ave N r 3 ■ L- rkin Rd -- - F- E oL`v �Y Abilene La SCOTT Homestead Tr ■ LAK ■ a 31 70th Av N ■ z Nystrom La m X 1 JUBERT �• .ot LAKE c ire ■ Old -ur ridge Rd �� ,'mid' = s;A ■ `° . Lakeview Cir a o,' ■ s ■ o _� a���a' ■ 1 fD Horseshoe Tr - ■ S< T 66th- Gleason Rd to ■�� ■ ■��c V m m - 'o r j p l MAKE L I3 �s �W v 0 o r on heel La - h o 63rd Ave N di d ckamors-RdL— =I j NINSIBININ 111111@11111.4 1111 INININI me IIII NIMBI IIII Isso NIMBI NNoI I= memo milmommel, 1=11,00810ppo 10=1161ARY. -f Potential Water Tower Locations Q Potential Supply Connections with Neighboring Communities ■��� Future Trunk Watermain Future Well Exploration Areas 2030 Service Boundary City Limit Open Water Wetlands October 7, 2009 Ar Bonestroo I:/ 504 / 50408144 /GIS /ComPlan /Maps /trunk water system.mxd Appendix 6 Downtown Feasibility Study for Gravity Sewer (April 2012) TO: Dan Donahue, City Administrator FROM: Kent Torve, P.E. and Heather Libby, P.E. DATE: April 5, 2012 SUBJECT: Feasibility Report for Downtown Gravity Sewer, Water and Street Reconstruction The Council has authorized a Feasibility Report to review the cost associated with gravity sewer and water service to the Downtown area. This analysis was an outcome of a business owner meeting, where costs of service were presented for a system of low pressure sewer and water. The business owners were looking for a comparison cost for gravity sewer, which eliminates each building's tanks and pumps. These utilities would be installed beneath the street which is typical of an "urban" utility service. This memo serves as the report for this authorization. A separate analysis of creating a special services district to fund the project as compared to the 429 process is being prepared by Northland Financial Services. Trunk Services The sewer would provide service to 48 parcels (44 hookups) via an 8 -inch gravity pipe. The pipes drain to the north and west, and terminate at a lift station located near the City ball fields north of CR 50. This location is consistent with the Master Sewer Plan, and is feasible from a topography standpoint. From the lift station the sewer would be pumped via forcemain to the connection point along CR 116 near St. Thomas Church. The alignment is shown in Figure 1. Water service would be provided to the same parcels. A 12 -inch watermain is proposed as being installed in the existing street with a minimum of 10 -foot separation distance as required from the sewer. The 12 -inch watermain would be extended (or "stubbed ") east of the intersection of CR116 and 75th Ave. N for future development, and west to provide for future connections for undeveloped areas. The alignment is shown in Figure 1. Street Restoration Installation of sewer and water would require a complete reconstruction of the street. The existing street is 24 -feet wide with two foot gravel shoulders. We have estimated the cost for street reconstruction two ways, a) reconstruct the street to its existing condition and b) reconstruct to 32 -feet width with curb and gutter and storm sewer. Properties The parcel count has been expanded to 48, and the boundary includes Commerce, Auger, 75th Ave. N, and some properties along CR 116, CR 10 and CR50. Figure 2 shows the proposed service area. \ \francis \voll\2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts)\Feasibility Study Apr 2012\memo feasibility downtown.docx Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Ctr. P.O. Box 249 A V \Y/ �� ` /\ e n < Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0249 c (763) 479 -4200 Fax (763) 479 -4242 E -mail: wenckmp @wenck.com TO: Dan Donahue, City Administrator FROM: Kent Torve, P.E. and Heather Libby, P.E. DATE: April 5, 2012 SUBJECT: Feasibility Report for Downtown Gravity Sewer, Water and Street Reconstruction The Council has authorized a Feasibility Report to review the cost associated with gravity sewer and water service to the Downtown area. This analysis was an outcome of a business owner meeting, where costs of service were presented for a system of low pressure sewer and water. The business owners were looking for a comparison cost for gravity sewer, which eliminates each building's tanks and pumps. These utilities would be installed beneath the street which is typical of an "urban" utility service. This memo serves as the report for this authorization. A separate analysis of creating a special services district to fund the project as compared to the 429 process is being prepared by Northland Financial Services. Trunk Services The sewer would provide service to 48 parcels (44 hookups) via an 8 -inch gravity pipe. The pipes drain to the north and west, and terminate at a lift station located near the City ball fields north of CR 50. This location is consistent with the Master Sewer Plan, and is feasible from a topography standpoint. From the lift station the sewer would be pumped via forcemain to the connection point along CR 116 near St. Thomas Church. The alignment is shown in Figure 1. Water service would be provided to the same parcels. A 12 -inch watermain is proposed as being installed in the existing street with a minimum of 10 -foot separation distance as required from the sewer. The 12 -inch watermain would be extended (or "stubbed ") east of the intersection of CR116 and 75th Ave. N for future development, and west to provide for future connections for undeveloped areas. The alignment is shown in Figure 1. Street Restoration Installation of sewer and water would require a complete reconstruction of the street. The existing street is 24 -feet wide with two foot gravel shoulders. We have estimated the cost for street reconstruction two ways, a) reconstruct the street to its existing condition and b) reconstruct to 32 -feet width with curb and gutter and storm sewer. Properties The parcel count has been expanded to 48, and the boundary includes Commerce, Auger, 75th Ave. N, and some properties along CR 116, CR 10 and CR50. Figure 2 shows the proposed service area. \ \francis \voll\2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts)\Feasibility Study Apr 2012\memo feasibility downtown.docx Cost Table 1 details the individual costs associated with water, sewer and street reconstruction work. It can be noted the costs include significant contingency due to the property issues, possible stormwater work, and coordination involved with servicing 48 parcels and disconnecting septic tanks, etc. Summary of Costs Sewer Water Street Reconstruction $584,000 $552,000 • 24 -ft Rural Street $464,000 Indirect Costs (Engineering, Legal, Appraisals, Easements) $365,000 Total Project at 24 ft street $1,965,000 Alternative A 32 -ft Urban Street (curb & gutter) $792,000 Total Project at 32 ft street $2,293,000 Conclusion The project is feasible from an engineering perspective and necessary should residents and council wish to install gravity sewer to the downtown area. The project involves logistical challenges of connecting individual properties along with significant legal and property efforts to obtain access. \ \francis \voll\2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts)\Feasibility Study Apr 2012\memo feasibility downtown.docx Table 1. Downtown Gravity Sewer, Water and Street Reconstruction Costs City of Corcoran Gravity Sewer (in street) From Downtown to Lift Station Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1 8" Gravity Sewer and Manholes Lineal Feet 5,220 $ 40 $ 209,000 2 Sewer Forcemain (4 "- diameter) Lineal Feet 1,970 $ 25 $ 49,000 3 Lift Station Lump Sum 1 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 4 Jacked Steel Casing (CR 10 & CR 50) Lineal Feet 200 $ 150 $ 30,000 5 Jacking /Boring Mobilization Lump Sum 1 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 6 Valves and Connection Stub Each 44 $ 2,000 $ 88,000 7 IMisc. traffic control, testing, etc. I Lump Sum 1 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 8 1 County Road 10 & 50 Construction Complexity I Lump Sum 1 1 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Total Sewer Construction: $ 531,000 Contingency (10 %) $ 53,000 Total $ 584,000 Water Main from CR 116 to Downtown Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1 12 -inch Main Open Cut with restoration Lineal Feet 7,025 $ 40 $ 281,000 2. Jacked Steel Casing (CR 10 & CR 50) Lineal Feet 200 $ 300 $ 60,000 3. Valves and hydrants Estimate 10 $ 4,000 $ 40,000 4. Misc. traffic control, testing, etc. Lump Sum 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 5. County Road 10 & 50 Construction Complexity Lump Sum 1 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 6. Curb Stops Each 44 $ 1,500 $ 66,000 7 Restoration Lump Sum 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Total Construction: $ 502,000 Contingency (10 %) $ 50,000 Total $ 552,000 Total Sewer and Water Trunk Lines $ 1,136,000 \ \francis \volt \2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility Study Apr 2012 \Downtown Mini FS Cost Table- gravity Street Reconstruction (24 -foot street with gra vel shoulders) Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1 Removal of existing pavement Square Yards 9,700 $ 10 $ 97,000 2 Wear Course (1.5 ") Ton 800 $ 65 $ 52,000 3 Base Course (2 ") Ton 1,100 $ 61 $ 67,000 4 Class 5 Aggregate (12 ") Cubic Yards 3,200 $ 25 $ 80,000 5 Select Granular (12 ") Cubic Yards 300 $ 23 $ 7,000 6 Class 5 Aggregate for 2' shoulders Cubic Yards 3,200 $ 25 $ 80,000 7 1 Geotextile Square Yards 1 9,700 $ 2 $ 19,000 8 lRestoration Lump Sum 1 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Total Street Construction: $ 422,000 Contingency (10 %) $ 42,000 Total $ 464,000 Street Reconstruction (32 -foot street with curb and gutter) Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1 Removal of existing pavement Square Yards 9,700 $ 10 $ 97,000 2 Wear Course (1.5 ") Ton 1,100 $ 65 $ 72,000 3 Base Course (2 ") Ton 1,400 $ 61 $ 85,000 4 Class 5 Aggregate (12 ") Cubic Yards 4,300 $ 25 $ 108,000 5 Select Granular (12 ") Cubic Yards 4,300 $ 23 $ 99,000 6 Geotextile Square Yards 12,900 $ 2 $ 26,000 7 Curb & Gutter Lineal Foot 7,200 $ 9 $ 65,000 8 Storm Sewer Lineal Foot 3,600 $ 25 $ 90,000 9 Pond Construction and Stormwater Improvements Lump Sum 1 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 10 Restoration Lump Sum 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Total Street Construction: $ 720,000 Contingency (10 %) $ 72,000 Total $ 792,000 Indirect Costs Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1 Easements Acre 1.54 $ 10,000 $ 15,000 2 Legal and Appraisal Estimate 1 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 3 Engineering and Surveying Estimate 1 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 4 Utilities, Landowner Coordination, misc. Estimate 1 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Subtotal $ 365,000 \ \francis \volt \2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility Study Apr 2012 \Downtown Mini FS Cost Table- gravity i Legend 40P, ❑R Station Tax Parcels f 3" Foremain 8" Gravity Sewer 1° _ •� 40 12" Water Main _ _ y - 4 �� . - -- �+ �� 1*1 22 2 ti _ _, . _. 24 ^� 10 }-CAS 3,- a r -� �� ,a }i f: • •'V, ' - ' 20 IV A& - i 1 _ 19 ' 26 42 11 2 - 7 18 -- - IV - 5 t 1 23 - _ agO.� �- I 16 17 7 _ #=1 29 46\T t .. -� �. -.14 13 48 ; 1 ff {' „1 n Future 1 Con , , nection �.. 32 1 �f 34' ' 33 � up to Gravity Line _ , t � - . 1711 �l�tlltl � � ? All, Aerial Photograph (Source: Bing Maps) 250 125 0 250 N Feet ath: L:\ 2294 170 \mxd \SE AIt\mxd \Water and SewerO Gons CenterRdNW.mxd Map ID PIN Bldg # Street Ow ner Map ID PIN Bldg # Street Ow ner 0 053- 2311923430004 20115 CO RD NO 10 10 -50 PROPERTIES LLC 25 053- 2611923120005 20209 CO RD NO 50 EDNA G LLC 1 053 - 2311923440015 20020 CO RD NO 10 ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCH 26 053 - 2611923120012 20110 AUGER AVE K & R LEWIS PROPERTIES LLP 2 053 - 2311923440018 20000 CO RD NO 10 CH OF ST THOMAS OF CORCORAN 27 053 - 2611923120013 20120 AUGER AVE K & R LEWIS PROPERTIES LLP 3 053 - 2611923110006 52 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED S W TREPTAU & M T TREPTAU 28 053 - 2611923120014 20125 AUGER AVE PRO DEVELOPMENT PROP LLC 4 053- 2611923110008 20045 CO RD NO 10 SCOTT W TREPTAU 29 053 - 2611923120015 20115 AUGER AVE GRANMOR LLC 5 053 - 2611923110009 20101 CO RD NO 50 S W TREPTAU & M T TREPTAU 30 053 - 2611923120016 52 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED COMMERCE STREET PARTNERS LLP 6 053 - 2611923110013 7625 CO RD NO 116 J H RYAN & D RYAN 31 053 - 2611923120017 20175 CO RD NO 50 FORSBERG PROPERTIES LLC 7 053 - 2611923110016 7559 CO RD NO 116 CORCORAN CORNER LLC 32 053 - 2611923140014 20095 75TH AVE N WW CONSTRUCTORS INC 8 053 - 2611923110019 7631 COMMERCE ST L M & S N OA RE TRUSTEES 33 053 - 2611923140018 19950 75TH AVE N LORE) & DONS LEUER 9 053- 2611923110022 19905 CO RD NO 10 A & P KRAL 34 053- 2611923140024 20010 75TH AV E N LE= W SUNRAM 10 053 - 2611923110025 52 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ST THOMAS CHURCH 35 053 - 2611923140026 20050 75TH AVE N T L & L E HILDE 11 053- 2611923110030 7670 COMMERCE ST TMR PROPERMES LLC 36 053 - 2611923130012 20160 75TH AVE N G & M PROPERTIES INC 42 053 - 2611923110031 7604 COMMERCE ST IRS HOLDINGS LLC 37 053 - 2611923130013 20150 75TH AVE N JOMICO INC 13 053 - 2611923110035 19945 75TH AVE N D W LADDUSAW & S M LADDUSAW 38 053- 2311923430003 20121 CO RD NO 10 JOSEPH ANDRES 14 053 - 2611923110036 20015 75TH AV E N D G & C J FAC KLER 39 053 - 2611923110005 20045 Cb RD NO 10 WILLIAM G TREPTAU 15 053 - 2611923110037 20055 75TH AVE N DAVID B ANDERSON 40 053 - 2611923110007 20037 CO RD NO 10 F A WALDRON & D E BENSON 16 053- 2611923110038 7550 COMMERCE ST FAIRWAY LLC 41 053 - 2611923110020 7591 COMMERCE ST T E GLEASON & K M GLEASON 17 053 - 2611923110041 7555 CO RD NO 116 DAVID A REMER ET AL 42 053 - 2611923110029 7590 COMMERCE ST PHILIP J KERBER 18 053 - 2611923110045 52 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CORCORAN CORNER LLC 43 053 - 2611923110039 19925 75TH AVE N L G LEUER & D A LEUER 19 053 - 2611923110046 7610 COMMERCE ST M E INDUSTRIES LLC 44 053 - 2611923110040 19905 75TH AVE N L G B INC 20 053 - 2611923110048 19925 CO RD NO 10 JEFFREY L JOHNSON 45 053 - 2611923110043 7575 COMMERCE ST DANNY L & EILE N E PETRIE 21 053 - 2611923120001 20113 CO RD NO 50 S W TREPTAU & M T TREPTAU 46 053 - 2611923110049 52 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED COMMERCE STREET PARTNERS LLP 22 053- 2611923120002 20123 CO RD NO 50 KATHLEEN ROEiL 47 053- 2611923140019 19910 75TH AVE N G & M PROPERTIES INC 23 053 - 2611923120003 20137 CO RD NO 50 HEDI ANN SHAWD 48 053- 2611923140025 7525 COMMERCE ST MANITOU GROUP LLC 24 053 - 2611923120004 20201 CO RD NO 50 ADAM DAVID LLC CITY OF CORCORAN Wenck APR 2012 Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Downtown Water and Sewer Trunk Lines Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 Figure 1 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 i Legend 40P, ❑R Station Tax Parcels f 3" Foremain 8" Gravity Sewer 1° _ •� 40 12" Water Main _ _ y - 4 �� . - -- �+ �� 1*1 22 2 ti _ _, . _. 24 ^� 10 }-CAS 3,- a r -� �� ,a }i f: • •'V, ' - ' 20 IV A& - 1 _ 19 ' 2i 26 42 11 2 - 7 18 -- - IV - 5 t 1 23 - _ agO.� �- I 16 17 7 _ #=1 29 46\T t .. -� �. -.14 13 48 ; 1 ff {' „1 n Future 1 Con , , nection �.. 32 1 �f 34' ' 33 � up to Gravity Line _ , t � - . 1711 �l�tlltl � � ? All, Aerial Photograph (Source: Bing Maps) 250 125 0 250 N Feet ath: L:\ 2294 170 \mxd \SE AIt\mxd \Water and SewerO Gons CenterRdNW.mxd Map ID PIN Bldg # Street Ow ner Map ID PIN Bldg # Street Ow ner 0 053- 2311923430004 20115 CO RD NO 10 10 -50 PROPERTIES LLC 25 053- 2611923120005 20209 CO RD NO 50 EDNA G LLC 1 053 - 2311923440015 20020 CO RD NO 10 ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCH 26 053 - 2611923120012 20110 AUGER AVE K & R LEWIS PROPERTIES LLP 2 053 - 2311923440018 20000 CO RD NO 10 CH OF ST THOMAS OF CORCORAN 27 053 - 2611923120013 20120 AUGER AVE K & R LEWIS PROPERTIES LLP 3 053 - 2611923110006 52 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED S W TREPTAU & M T TREPTAU 28 053 - 2611923120014 20125 AUGER AVE PRO DEVELOPMENT PROP LLC 4 053- 2611923110008 20045 CO RD NO 10 SCOTT W TREPTAU 29 053 - 2611923120015 20115 AUGER AVE GRANMOR LLC 5 053 - 2611923110009 20101 CO RD NO 50 S W TREPTAU & M T TREPTAU 30 053 - 2611923120016 52 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED COMMERCE STREET PARTNERS LLP 6 053 - 2611923110013 7625 CO RD NO 116 J H RYAN & D RYAN 31 053 - 2611923120017 20175 CO RD NO 50 FORSBERG PROPERTIES LLC 7 053 - 2611923110016 7559 CO RD NO 116 CORCORAN CORNER LLC 32 053 - 2611923140014 20095 75TH AVE N WW CONSTRUCTORS INC 8 053 - 2611923110019 7631 COMMERCE ST L M & S N OA RE TRUSTEES 33 053 - 2611923140018 19950 75TH AVE N LORE) & DONS LEUER 9 053- 2611923110022 19905 CO RD NO 10 A & P KRAL 34 053- 2611923140024 20010 75TH AV E N LE= W SUNRAM 10 053 - 2611923110025 52 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ST THOMAS CHURCH 35 053 - 2611923140026 20050 75TH AVE N T L & L E HILDE 11 053- 2611923110030 7670 COMMERCE ST TMR PROPERMES LLC 36 053 - 2611923130012 20160 75TH AVE N G & M PROPERTIES INC 42 053 - 2611923110031 7604 COMMERCE ST IRS HOLDINGS LLC 37 053 - 2611923130013 20150 75TH AVE N JOMICO INC 13 053 - 2611923110035 19945 75TH AVE N D W LADDUSAW & S M LADDUSAW 38 053- 2311923430003 20121 CO RD NO 10 JOSEPH ANDRES 14 053 - 2611923110036 20015 75TH AV E N D G & C J FAC KLER 39 053 - 2611923110005 20045 Cb RD NO 10 WILLIAM G TREPTAU 15 053 - 2611923110037 20055 75TH AVE N DAVID B ANDERSON 40 053 - 2611923110007 20037 CO RD NO 10 F A WALDRON & D E BENSON 16 053- 2611923110038 7550 COMMERCE ST FAIRWAY LLC 41 053 - 2611923110020 7591 COMMERCE ST T E GLEASON & K M GLEASON 17 053 - 2611923110041 7555 CO RD NO 116 DAVID A REMER ET AL 42 053 - 2611923110029 7590 COMMERCE ST PHILIP J KERBER 18 053 - 2611923110045 52 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CORCORAN CORNER LLC 43 053 - 2611923110039 19925 75TH AVE N L G LEUER & D A LEUER 19 053 - 2611923110046 7610 COMMERCE ST M E INDUSTRIES LLC 44 053 - 2611923110040 19905 75TH AVE N L G B INC 20 053 - 2611923110048 19925 CO RD NO 10 JEFFREY L JOHNSON 45 053 - 2611923110043 7575 COMMERCE ST DANNY L & EILE N E PETRIE 21 053 - 2611923120001 20113 CO RD NO 50 S W TREPTAU & M T TREPTAU 46 053 - 2611923110049 52 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED COMMERCE STREET PARTNERS LLP 22 053- 2611923120002 20123 CO RD NO 50 KATHLEEN ROEiL 47 053- 2611923140019 19910 75TH AVE N G & M PROPERTIES INC 23 053 - 2611923120003 20137 CO RD NO 50 HEDI ANN SHAWD 48 053- 2611923140025 7525 COMMERCE ST MANITOU GROUP LLC 24 053 - 2611923120004 20201 CO RD NO 50 ADAM DAVID LLC CITY OF CORCORAN Wenck APR 2012 Engineers - Scientists 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Downtown Water and Sewer Trunk Lines Business Professionals Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0429 Figure 1 www.wenck.com 1- 800 - 472 -2232 �Wenck Engineers • Scientists Business Professionals STAFF REPORT Agenda Item. 11 c. Council Meeting: Prepared By: July 24, 2014 Brad Martens Topic: Action Required: Draft 2015 Budget Direction Summary: Annually the City of Corcoran adopts a budget and levy for the following year. Staff has spent considerable time drafting a 2015 budget for City Council review which is attached to this report. It is requested that the City Council provide feedback to staff on any adjustments to be made or additional items to look into. The deadline for the 2015 budget is as follows: • September 11, 2014: Adopt Preliminary Levy • December 22, 2014: Adopt Final Levy and Budget The first draft of the 2015 budget represents a mix of department requests and the necessary resources to complete the goals and objectives of the City Council as well as to accomplish its mission and vision. It is expected that this draft will be manipulated and refined prior to adopting the Preliminary Levy in September. The following table gives a big picture overview of the draft 2015 budget related to property taxes and tax rate as compared to the 2014 budget. As you see in the table, while property taxes in the draft 2015 budget are higher than 2014, the overal tax rate decreases by 1.22 %. The reason for this is the 10.3% increase in tax capacity which took place from the previous year which can be attributed to the decertification of the TIF District, increased valuations, and new construction. A significant portion of increases to the draft 2015 budget are related to the debt service levy or costs related to accomplishing the goals of the City as shown in the following table. 2014 Draft 2015 Difference General Levy $2,743,280 $2,907,228 $163,948 or 6% Debt Levy (General Fund) $363,420 $440,727 $77,307 or 21.3% Total Levy $3,106,700 $3,347,955 $241,255 or 7.7% Tax Rate 49.74% 48.52% -1.22% As you see in the table, while property taxes in the draft 2015 budget are higher than 2014, the overal tax rate decreases by 1.22 %. The reason for this is the 10.3% increase in tax capacity which took place from the previous year which can be attributed to the decertification of the TIF District, increased valuations, and new construction. A significant portion of increases to the draft 2015 budget are related to the debt service levy or costs related to accomplishing the goals of the City as shown in the following table. Levy Increase from 2014 % of Levy Increase Debt Levy $77,307 32 CIP Installment $25,000 10 Transfer to Infrstructure Fund $18,000 7 Purchases moved out of CIP $6,500 3 Recording Council meetings $29,300 12 All other items $81,148 35 Total $241,255 100 Page 2 In order to provide the City Council with a more in -depth overview of the 2015 budget, the following table and detail highlight the most significant differences between the draft 2015 budget the adopted 2014 budget: Non - Property Tax Revenue: Increase of $150,400 Category Change Notes General Government $17,000 $5,000 increase in Cable Franchise Fee, Wages /Salaries /Benefits $140,056 $5,000 increase in AG Preserve Credit, $8,000 increase in TIF Administration, $1,000 decrease in Interest Earnings Public Safety - $16,100 $15,000 decrease in Fines Building Inspection $143,000 $143,000 increase in Building Permit Fees for Ravinia phase 1 (33 new homes at $400,000 valuation) Ice & Snow Removal $8,000 $8,000 increase in Miscellaneous Revenue to sell salt to adjacent Elections - $3,500 communities Expenditures: Increase of $395,847 Category Change Notes Debt Service $77,307 Increase per debt schedule Wages /Salaries /Benefits $140,056 2% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA), Step increase for five eligible employees, New full -time position in administration department effective 7/1/14 (see memo), 1,000 additional PT Police Officer hours, Wage increase for PT /Seasonal Public Works employees, 70% share of health insurance premium increase Elections - $3,500 No election in 2015 Auditor $1,060 Proposed rate increase Assessor $3,168 Increase per contract Attorney $1,000 Proposed rate increase Other General Government $14,880 $9,750 increase in Insurance (PW Facility), $2,885 increase to Dues & Memberships, $2,500 increase to Prof. Services (recording Council meetings) City Hall Operating $10,211 $3,000 increase in Utilities, Supplies $3,000 increase in Repairs /Maint. $2,500 increase in Operating Supplies, $1,700 increase in Prof. Services IT Technology $54,157 $34,800 increase in Facility Assets ($6,500 computers, $26,300 recording council meeting equipment), $14,257 Computer Supplies (cost for hosting /licensing LETG for Police Page 3 Financial /Budget: The draft 2015 budget proposes a 7.7% property tax levy increase and results in a tax rate decrease of 1.22 %. The direct effects of the draft 2015 budget depend on the valuation change in individual properties. Properties with no change in valuation would see a decrease in City taxes while properties with increase valuations could see an increase. For example, a home that was valued at $200,000 in 2014 would see an increase to City tax if the valuation increased more than 2.5 %. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being, and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost - effective, and friendly manner. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We believe that fiscal responsibility, and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. OPEN AND HONEST COMMUNICATION We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. TREATING THE CITIZEN AS OUR CUSTOMER We believe that citizens are our customers and should be treated with courtesy, respect, and deserve the best services we can provide. Department, formerly paid out of different fund), $7,100 increase in Prof. Supplies (business continuity plan -back up system) Transfers to Other Funds $43,000 $18,000 to Infrastructure Fund, $25,000 to CIP Engineering $5,000 MS4 & SWPPP requirements Fire $11,000 Estimated increase to contracts Building Inspection $52,000 Additional inspections for Ravinia (offset by revenue) Public Works Oper. Exp. $25,000 $3,000 increase in Motor Fuels, $5,000 increase in Repair /Maint. Supp., $2,000 increase in Telephone, $15,000 increase in Utility Services (new facility) Public Works Oper. Serv. $10,500 Increase for Seal Coating Parks Oper. Exp. $5,000 Operating Supplies Ice & Snow Removal $1,000 Salt and Sand Police Supplies $2,100 $1,600 increase in Training and Supplies Financial /Budget: The draft 2015 budget proposes a 7.7% property tax levy increase and results in a tax rate decrease of 1.22 %. The direct effects of the draft 2015 budget depend on the valuation change in individual properties. Properties with no change in valuation would see a decrease in City taxes while properties with increase valuations could see an increase. For example, a home that was valued at $200,000 in 2014 would see an increase to City tax if the valuation increased more than 2.5 %. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being, and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost - effective, and friendly manner. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We believe that fiscal responsibility, and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. OPEN AND HONEST COMMUNICATION We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees. TREATING THE CITIZEN AS OUR CUSTOMER We believe that citizens are our customers and should be treated with courtesy, respect, and deserve the best services we can provide. Page 4 PROFESSIONALISM We believe that continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism and are committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and the development of our employees. Options: 1. Review draft 2015 budget and direct staff on next steps. Recommendation: N/A Council Action: Review draft 2015 budget and direct staff on next steps. Attachments: 1. Draft 2015 Budget 2. Memo — Administration Department Staffing I CITY OF CORCORAN 2015 DRAFT BUDGET - REV 1 2 2015 7/17/2014 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2012 ACTUAL 2013 ACTUAL 2014 BUDGET 2015 BUDGET ESUDGE DIFFERENCE 2014/2015 4 1 CITY HALL DEPARTMENTS COMMENTS 5 City Council 6 41100 -100 Wages & Salaries 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 $ - 7 41100 -122 FICA / SS 409 409 409 409 $ - 8 41100 -126 Medicare 96 96 96 96 $ - 9 41100 -210 Operating Expense - - 100 - $ (100) 101 1 41100 -364 1 Workers' Compensation 32 41 46 104 $ 58 11 Total City Council 7,137 7,146 7,251 7,209 (42) 12 13 News Letter / Website 14 41130 -351 News letter, Misc literature 4,062 4,482 4,500 4,750 $ 250 16 41130 -354 Website 700 700 700 700 $ - 171 1 Total Newsletter & Web 4,762 5,182 5,200 5,450 250 18 19 Elections 20 41410 -210 Operating Supplies 6,263 1,397 5,000 1,500 $ (3,500) 21 Total Elections 6,263 1,397 5,000 1,500 (3,500) 22 231 1 Auditor 24 41540 -300 Professional Services 16,675 19,352 18,940 20,000 $ 1,060 25 Financial Services 5,486 3,640 6,000 6,000 $ - 28 Total Auditor 22,161 22,992 24,940 26,000 1,060 29 30 Assessor 311 1 41550 -210 Operating Supplies 929 960 1,000 1,000 $ - 32 41550 -300 Professional Services 49,284 50,203 52,788 55,956 $ 3,168 6% 2015 rate increase 33 Total Assessor 50,213 51,163 53,788 56,956 3,168 34 35 Attorney 36 41600 -300 Professional Services 22,353 30,865 30,000 31,000 $ 1,000 2% rate increase 371 1 Total City Attorney 22,353 30,865 30,000 31,000 1,000 38 44 Other General Government 48 41900 -210 Operating Supplies 31 6,573 3,255 3,000 $ (255) Crop land tax 49 41900 -300 Professional Srvs 21,041 25,721 - 2,500 $ 2,500 Council video recording, financial planning 51 41900 -360 Insurance 18,806 54,412 57,000 66,750 $ 9,750 3% increase from 2014 actual 521 1 41900 -430 1 Misc Banking Charges - - - $ - 53 41900 -433 1 Dues & Memberships 24,454 26,709 27,115 30,000 $ 2,885 64 Total Other Government 64,332 113,416 87,370 102,250 14,880 65 66 Planning & Zoning 67 41910 -210 Operating Supplies 589 1,000 1,000 $ PH notices, labels, postage 681 1 41910 -300 Professional Services 41,728 42,089 50,000 50,000 $ - 70 Total Planning & Zoning 41,728 42,678 51,000 51,000 71 72 City Hall Operating Expenses 73 41941 -200 Office Supplies 1,978 2,462 3,000 3,000 $ - 74 41941 -201 Postage /Shipping 1,628 2,424 2,500 3,000 $ 500 751 1 41941 -207 Computer / Copier Supplies 2,424 2,615 3,000 3,000 $ - Loffler contract? 761 1 41941 -210 Operating Supplies 12,497 16,043 12,500 15,000 $ 2,500 Cintas, Zep, Adams, Wilmar Water 771 1 41941 -300 Professional Services 15,385 7,668 7,300 9,000 $ 1,700 Admin fees increase (Paychex), Ordinance Codification 78 41941 -321 Telephone 2,182 2,189 3,000 3,000 $ - 79 41941 -352 Gen. Notices Public Hearing information 2,235 2,797 1,500 2,000 $ 500 Crow River News 80 41941 -364 Workers Comp Insur. ( Misc. Vol. Commissioners Staff) - - 14 25 $ 11 81 41941 -380 Utilities / Outside Services 12,833 15,121 14,500 15,500 $ 1,000 Center Point, Randys, Wright Henn Elec, Wright Henn Security 82 41941 -400 Repairs /Maintenance Bldg. 9,817 8,112 9,000 12,000 $ 3,000 General maintenance 841 1 41941 -520 Buildings & Structures 4,053 4,000 5,000 $ 1,000 Facility repairs 861 1 Total City Hall Operating 61,042 63,488 60,314 70,525 10,211 10a. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2015 DRAFT BUDGET - REV 1 2 2015 7/17/2014 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2012 ACTUAL 2013 ACTUAL 2014 BUDGET 2015 BUDGET ESUDGE DIFFERENCE 2014/2015 87 881 1 IT Technology 90 41951 -207 Computer / Supplies 7,580 9,723 7,500 22,757 $ 15,257 Annual license renewal 91 41951 -210 Operating Supplies 1,252 4,500 1,500 $ (3,000) Hardware /Software 92 41951 -300 Professional Supplies 4,897 6,000 13,100 $ 7,100 Managed services 93 41951 -530 Facility Assets 8,584 - 34,800 $ 34,800 Council video equipment, 3 Computers 94 Total IT Technology 7,580 24,456 18,000 72,157 54,157 95 961 1 Engineering 98 43170 -300 Professional Services 53,365 38,592 40,000 45,000 $ 5,000 MS4 & SWPPP 99 Total Engineering 53,365 38,592 40,000 45,000 5,000 100 101 Fire 102 42200 -300 Professional Services 242,083 236,478 239,000 250,000 $ 11,000 1051 1 Total Fire Services 242,083 236,478 239,000 250,000 11,000 106 107 Building Inspections 108 42400 -300 Professional Services 9,421 24,023 28,000 74,000 $ 46,000 Ravinia Phase 1 109 42400 -437 Surcharges 1,727 3,812 5,000 11,000 $ 6,000 Ravinia Phase 1 110 Total Building Inspections 11,148 27,835 33,000 85,000 52,000 111 112 Recycling 113 43232 -210 Operating Supplies 827 797 1,000 1,000 $ - 114 43232 -300 Professional Services 64,743 67,420 69,000 69,000 $ - 115 Total Recycling 65,570 68,217 70,000 70,000 - 116 1171 1 TOTAL CITY HALL 659,736 733,904 724,863 874,047 149,184 118 119 City Administrator 120 41300 -100 Wages & Salaries 92,519 117,644 91,780 92,912 $ 1,132 121 41300 -121 PERA 6,708 8,313 6,654 6,736 $ 82 122 41300 -122 FICA / SS 5,148 6,639 5,690 5,761 $ 71 1231 1 41300 -126 Medicare 1,312 1,444 1,331 1,347 $ 16 1241 1 41300 -130 Employer Paid FSA - - - - $ - 125 41300 -131 Employer Paid Health 13,959 17,622 16,745 15,567 $ (1,178) Life, A/D, LTD, STD, FSA/HSA, Health 126 41300 -132 Medical Cafeteria Plan - - - $ - 127 41300 -133 Employer Paid HSA - $ 128 41300 -140 Unemployment Compensation - - $ - 129 41300 -208 Training 1,813 1,321 3,650 4,000 $ 350 $ 725 MCMA Conference $ 1,900 ICMA Conference $ 375 LMC Conference $ 800 Leadership Growth Group $ 200 MAMA 130 41300 -210 Operating Supplies 492 868 700 700 $ - 1311 1 41300 -300 Professional Services - - - - $ - 132 41300 -364 Workers' Compensation (683) 354 809 753 $ (56) 133 $ 111 1 MN City /County Managers $ - 134 $ 738 ICMA $ - 135 41300 -433 Dues & Memberships 848 873 700 850 $ 150 136 Total City Administrator 122,114 155,078 128,059 128,626 567 1371 1 1381 1 City Clerk / Administrative Staff 139 41400 -100 Wages & Salaries 135,247 127,511 120,082 142,174 $ 22,092 Additional staff mid year 2015 140 41400 -110 Overtime 1,827 1,979 2,000 2,000 $ - 141 41400 -121 PERA 9,922 8,722 8,851 10,453 $ 1,602 142 41400 -122 FICA /SS 8,883 8,428 7,569 8,939 $ 1,370 143 41400 -126 Medicare 2,078 1,971 1,770 2,091 $ 321 1451 1 41400 -131 Employer Paid Health 23,363 21,871 30,100 40,122 $ 10,022 Life, A/D, LTD, STD, FSA/HSA, Health 149 41400 -208 Training 830 1,835 2,500 2,500 $ - 1501 1 41400 -210 Operating Supplies 404 457 500 500 $ - Mileage 7521 1 41400 -364 Workers' Compensation Insurance 1,216 1,064 1,041 1,344 $ 303 1531 1 41400 -433 Dues & Memberships 1 35 70 150 1 150 1 $ - 10a. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2015 DRAFT BUDGET - REV 1 2 2015 7/17/2014 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2012 ACTUAL 2013 ACTUAL 2014 BUDGET 2015 BUDGET ESUDGE DIFFERENCE 2014/2015 154 Total Administrative Staff 183,804 173,908 174,563 210,273 35,710 1551 1 156 Code Enforcement 157 41920 -100 Wages & Salaries 7,543 42,876 50,440 53,186 $ 2,746 158 41920 -110 Overtime - 371 1,000 1,000 $ - 159 41920 -121 PERA 503 3,077 3,729 3,928 $ 199 160 41920 -122 FICA /SS 445 3,000 3,189 3,360 $ 171 1611 1 41920 -126 Medicare 104 702 746 786 $ 40 163 41920 -131 Health Insurance - 6,426 15,050 16,387 $ 1,337 Life, A /D, LTD, STD, FSA/HSA, Health 165 41920 -208 Training 1 1 750 750 1 $ - 166 41920 -210 lOperating Supplies 1 1,054 1 708 1 1,000 1,000 1 $ 10a. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2015 DRAFT BUDGET - REV 1 2 2015 7/17/2014 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2012 ACTUAL 2013 ACTUAL 2014 BUDGET 2015 BUDGET BUDGE DIFFERENCE 2014/2015 170 41920 -364 Workers' Compensation 401 417 $ 16 1711 1 41920 -417 jUnii form 100 100 200 250 $ 50 172 41920 -433 1 Dues & Membership - - 100 100 $ - 173 Total Code Enforcement 10,276 57,260 76,605 81,164 4,559 174 175 Employee Benefit Charges 176 43190 -300 Professional Services - 3,000 - $ (3,000) 1771 1 Total Employee Benefit Chgs - 3,000 - $ 3,000 178 179 Transfers to /from Other Funds 180 41900 -xxx Transfer to other funds 18,000 $ 18,000 Infrastructure /Shannon Lane (402/417) 41900 -xxx Transfer to other funds 25,000 $ 25,000 CIP 182 183 Total Administration 975,930 1,120,151 1,107,091 1,312,110 190,020 1841 1 185 PUBLIC WORKS 186 PERSONNEL SERVICES 187 43100 -100 Full -time - Regular 269,477 268,973 285,440 283,606 $ (1,834) 188 43100 -110 Full -time - Overtime 17,020 26,179 19,380 20,000 $ 620 Includes $1,000 for Country Daze 189 43100 -121 PERA 20,839 21,104 22,099 22,011 $ (88) 1901 1 43100 -122 FICA / SS 16,695 17,244 18,899 18,824 $ (75) 191 43100 -126 Medicare 3,954 3,983 4,420 4,402 $ (18) 193 43100 -131 Employer Paid Health 61,921 47,773 75,250 78,656 $ 3,406 Life, A /D, LTD, STD, FSA/HSA, Health 197 43100 -140 Unemployment Compensation 4,057 - - $ - 198 43100 -364 Workers' Compensation Insurance 20,996 17,899 25,971 19,364 $ (6,607) 199 43100 -417 Uniforms 5,874 6,345 7,000 7,000 $ - 2001 1 Total Public Works Personnel 416,777 413,557 458,459 453,863 (4,596) 201 202 OPERATING EXPENSE 204 43100 -208 Training and Instruction 3,739 2,191 4,000 4,000 $ - 205 43100 -210 Operating Supplies 21,091 21,767 25,000 25,000 $ - 206 43100 -212 Motor Fuels 37,195 40,466 37,000 40,000 $ 3,000 2071 1 43100 -220 Repair/ Main. Supplies 22,147 19,341 20,000 25,000 $ 5,000 208 43100 -223 Building Repair 332 3,890 4,500 4,500 $ - Maintenance contracts (HVAC) 209 43100 -300 Professional Services 2,100 2,216 2,100 2,100 $ - 210 43100 -321 Telephone 5,005 3,868 6,000 8,000 $ 2,000 Cost of phone service in new building 212 43100 -380 Utility services 7,726 14,211 15,000 30,000 $ 15,000 Utilities for new Public Works site 214 Total Public Works Operating Expense 99,335 108,010 113,600 138,600 25,000 2151 1 2161 1 CITY OPERATING SERVICES 217 43100 -222 Seal Coating 40,286 - 50,000 60,000 $ 10,000 218 43100 -225 Land Scape /Ditch Maintenance 9,179 9,807 10,000 10,000 $ - 219 43100 -226 Sign Repair Material 4,149 6,146 6,000 6,000 $ - 220 43100 -227 Crack Filling 12,564 9,426 10,000 10,000 $ - 221 43100 -228 Dust Control 94,301 102,689 110,000 110,000 $ - 222 43100 -229 Culverts 11,132 209 10,000 10,000 $ - 2251 1 43100 -232 Gravel 117,765 118,592 130,000 130,000 $ - 2261 1 43100 -233 Asphalt /Maintenance patching 143,634 116,912 130,000 130,000 $ - 227 43100 -381 ISignal Lights /street lights 2,142 3,922 3,500 4,000 $ 500 228 Total Public Works City Operating Services 435,153 367,704 459,500 470,000 10,500 229 230 PARKS PERSONNEL SERVICES 231 45200 -100 Wages and Salaries 17,205 23,463 29,425 36,788 $ 7,363 2341 1 45200 -122 FICA /SS 1,098 1,481 1,824 2,281 $ 457 235 45200 -126 Medicare 257 346 427 533 $ 106 238 45200 -364 1 Workers' Compensation Insurance (1,815) 947 1,189 1,957 $ 768 239 Total Parks Personnel 17,222 26,687 32,865 41,559 8,694 240 241 PARKS OPERATING EXPENSES 2421 1 45200 -210 Operating Supplies 9,314 25,518 10,000 15,000 $ 5,000 Combined with Repair /Maint 45200 -220 244 45200 -221 Maintenance Project 13,592 13,946 1 15,000 1 15,000 1 $ - 246 45200 -321 Telephone 614 652 1 700 1 700 $ - 247 45200 -380 1 Utility services 1 4,572 1 6,330 1 8,000 1 8,000 $ 10a. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2015 DRAFT BUDGET - REV 1 2 2015 7/17/2014 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2012 ACTUAL 2013 ACTUAL 2014 BUDGET 2015 BUDGET ESUDGE DIFFERENCE 2014/2015 248 45200 -530 Improvements Other than Bldg 36,221 32,599 37,302 37,302 $ - NW Trails Snowmobile expense pass thru to 100 - 45200 -33422 250 Total Parks Operating Expense 64,312 79,046 71,002 76,002 5,000 251 2521 1 Total Parks 81,534 105,733 103,867 117,561 13,694 10a. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2015 DRAFT BUDGET - REV 1 2 2015 7/17/2014 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2012 ACTUAL 2013 ACTUAL 2014 BUDGET 2015 BUDGET ESUDGE DIFFERENCE 2014/2015 253 2541 1 Ice & Snow Removal 255 43125 -210 Snow and Ice Removal 23,935 39,361 29,000 30,000 $ 1,000 Salt and Sand 256 Total Snow & Ice 23,935 39,361 29,000 30,000 1,000 257 258 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS & PARKS 1,056,733 1,034,366 1,164,426 1,210,024 45,598 259 2601 1 POLICE 261 PERSONNEL SERVICES 262 POLICE 263 42100 -100 Wages (Union) 507,594 341,106 345,433 352,276 $ 6,843 2% COLA 264 42100 -101 Salaries 181,171 184,794 188,490 $ 3,696 265 42100 -110 Overtime 1,507 2,283 7,000 9,500 $ 2,500 Includes $1,000 for Country Daze 266 42100 -111 Overtime Events 10,756 14,178 15,000 15,000 $ - Pass thru funds only 267 42100 -121 PERA 74,884 77,456 83,853 90,492 $ 6,639 City Contribution increase - 15.3% to 16.2% 269 42100 -126 Medicare 7,615 8,080 7,947 8,100 $ 153 271 42100 -131 Employer Paid Health 77,650 78,945 97,348 111,823 $ 14,475 275 42100 -364 Workers' Compensation 7,456 15,029 23,520 26,516 $ 2,996 LMC Estimate increase based on two officer IOD 2014 276 Total Police Personnel Services 687,472 718,248 764,895 802,197 37,302 277 278 PART TIME 279 42101 -100 Wages and Salaries 75,072 87,686 78,100 100,100 $ 22,000 282 42101 -121 PERA 1,851 2,183 2,500 4,000 $ 1,500 283 42101 -122 FICA / SS 4,252 4,730 4,842 6,206 $ 1,364 284 42101 -126 Medicare 1,181 1,326 1,132 1,451 $ 319 2861 1 Total Part Time 88,708 99,691 86,574 111,757 25,183 287 288 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 289 42102 -100 Wages and Salaries 39,515 42,309 45,011 47,507 $ 2,496 290 42102 -110 Overtime 15 - 500 500 $ - 291 42102 -121 PERA 2,878 3,028 3,300 3,601 $ 301 2921 1 42102 -122 FICA / SS 2,671 2,850 2,822 2,976 $ 154 2931 1 42102 -126 1 Medicare 625 667 660 696 $ 36 295 42102 -131 1 Employer Paid Health 1,392 6,774 8,000 8,350 $ 350 Opt out health care - 297 Total Police Administration 51,604 55,627 60,293 63,630 3,337 298 299 SUPPLIES 300 42100 -200 Office Supplies 5,237 4,751 5,000 5,000 $ - 3011 1 42100 -201 Postage 354 152 250 250 $ - 302 42100 -208 Training Classes and Supplies 11,010 9,677 10,000 11,600 $ 1,600 303 42100 -209 Police Reserves Equipment 3,120 3,499 3,500 3,500 $ - 304 42100 -210 Patrol Supplies 4,185 3,279 4,000 4,000 $ 305 42100 -212 Motor Fuels 39,115 37,363 37,000 37,000 $ - 306 42100 -417 Clothing and Uniforms 7,768 6,439 9,460 9,960 $ 500 307 42100 -433 Dues and Memberships 870 1,470 1,200 1,200 $ - 309 Total Police Supplies 71,660 66,630 70,410 72,510 2,100 310 311 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 312 42100 -220 Maintenance - Motor Vehicle 13,397 9,244 8,000 8,000 $ - 313 42100 -223 Building Maintenance and Repairs 3,711 3,403 3,000 3,000 $ 3141 1 42100 -300 Professional - Animal Control 40 30 250 250 $ 315 42100 -301 Prisoner - Professional Fees 5,370 13,801 8,000 8,000 $ 316 42100 -304 Legal Services 25,869 30,320 27,500 27,500 $ 317 42100 -321 Telephone 7,245 6,903 7,200 7,200 $ 318 42100 -323 Radio Units 11,420 13,975 15,300 15,300 $ 319 42100 -380 Utility Services / Civil Defense /Emergency Management 2,141 3,559 4,000 4,000 $ - 320 Total Contractual Services 69,193 81,237 73,250 73,250 $ 321 322 TOTAL POLICE 968,636 1,021,432 1,055,422 1,123,344 $ 67,922 323 324 325 COMBINED DEPARTMENT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,001,299 3,175,949 3,326,938 3,645,478 $ 318,540 10a. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2015 DRAFT BUDGET - REV 1 2 2015 7/17/2014 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2012 ACTUAL 2013 ACTUAL 2014 BUDGET 2015 BUDGET ESUDGE DIFFERENCE 2014/2015 326 327 Debt Service 328 Equipment Certificate Fund 329 335 Principal & Interest -2008 220,170 208,726 99,661 100,219 336 Principal & Interest -2010 61,833 60,658 337 Principal & Interest -2012 44,555 44,295 338 Principal & Interest -2014 55,640 339 Total Principal & Interest 206,049 260,812 3401 1 Required 5% overage 11,009 10,436 10,302 13,041 341 Total 231,179 219,162 216,351 273,853 $ 57,502 349 350 Facility Expansion (PD) #307 & #407 353 Principal & Interest 41,412 40,828 41,178 20,440 354 Required 5% Overage 2,071 2,041 2,059 1,022 3551 1 Total 43,483 42,869 43,237 21,462 $ (21,775) 356 357 Facility Expansion (Public Works) 2012B 358 Principal & Interest 65,000 98,888 138,488 $ - 359 Required 5% Overage 3,250 4,944 6,924 $ - 360 Total 68,250 103,832 145,412 $ 41,581 3611 1 367 368 COMBINED DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES 274,662 330,281 363,420 440,727 $ 77,307 369 3701 REVENUES 2012 ACTUAL 2013 BUDGET 2014 BUDGET 2015 BUDGET BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2014/2015 371 GENERAL FUND REVENUE 372 373 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 374 41900 -31810 Cable Franchise Fee 38,196 39,489 35,000 40,000 $ 5,000 375 41900 -32110 Liquor Licenses Fees 18,270 18,300 18,250 18,250 $ - 378 41900 -33420 AG Preserve Credit 5,825 8,414 5,000 $ 5,000 379 41900 -33421 PERA State Aid 1,845 1,845 1,845 1,845 $ - 382 41900 -34103 Zoning / Subdivision Fees 7,180 37,805 6,000 6,000 $ 383 41900 -34105 Copies / Maps 108 338 150 150 $ 384 41900 -34107 Assessment Search 50 100 50 50 $ - 385 41900 -34108 TIF Administrative Fees 8,500 12,000 - 8,000 $ 8,000 387 41900 -34405 Clean up day Income 709 675 675 675 $ - 388 1 41900 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenue 18,635 16,075 2,500 2,500 $ 389 41900 -36210 Interest Earnings 1,953 1,028 3,000 2,000 $ (1,000) 390 41900 -36217 Sale of Assets - $ 391 41900 -36220 Rents / Royalties 10,848 10,848 9,840 9,840 $ Crop Rentals 392 41900 -36230 Donations 4,575 1,300 1,000 1,000 $ 397 CITY HALL OPERATIONS $ 399 1 41941 -34101 lFacilityRental 5,890 6,095 4,500 5,000 $ 500 4001 1 41941 -36200 1 Miscellaneous Revenue 1,229 2,786 1,000 1,000 $ - 401 PUBLIC SAFETY $ 403 42100 -33423 Police Town Aid 45,308 43,431 47,000 45,000 $ (2,000) 404 42100 -33424 Police Training & POST 3,321 3,759 3,500 3,700 $ 200 405 42100 -33620 Other Grants and Aid /Safe & Sober 11,939 12,283 10,000 7,500 $ (2,500) Pass through only - Area traffic project (42100 -111) 406 42100 -34200 Police Permits 2,417 2,054 1,500 2,000 $ 500 407 42100 -34201 Police Service Charge 7,163 10,053 5,000 7,500 $ 2,500 Pass through only- Contractural events (42100 -111) 408 42100 -34202 Police Reports / Misc. Fees 756 929 800 1,000 $ 200 410 42100 -35101 1 Fines 80,338 58,194 75,000 60,000 $ (15,000) 414 BUILDING INSPECTION $ - 415 42400 -32210 IBuilding Permit Fees 56,021 141,224 50,000 193,000 $ 143,000 Ravinia Phase 1 416 PUBLIC WORKS $ - 417 1 43100 -33418 MSA Road Maint. Fund 126,236 125,051 125,000 125,000 $ 418 43100 -34300 Public Works Permits/ Fees 3,930 2,670 3,000 3,000 $ 4191 1 43100 -34301 Dust Control 73,170 64,533 55,530 55,530 1 $ lCouncil direction 4231 1 ICE & SNOW REMOVAL 1 $ 10a. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2015 DRAFT BUDGET - REV 1 2 2015 7/17/2014 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2012 ACTUAL 2013 ACTUAL 2014 BUDGET 2015 BUDGET ESUDGE DIFFERENCE 2014/2015 424 43125 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenue - - 8,000 $ 8,000 425 RECYCLING $ - 426 43232 -33610 County Recycling Grant 14,820 14,808 14,500 14,500 $ 427 43232 -34400 Recycling Income 60,531 61,932 64,000 62,000 $ (2,000) 428 43232 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenue $ 429 PARKS $ - 430 45200 -33422 Other State Grant 36,221 32,599 37,302 37,302 $ Snowmobile trail grant 431 45200 -34101 Facility Rental 1,996 1,585 1,000 1,000 $ - 435 TRANSFERS TO /FROM OTHER FUNDS $ 436 49360 -39200 Transfer from Other Fund $ - 437 438 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES 683,217 875,407 576,942 727,342 150,400 439 442 41900 -33422 Local Government Aid 7,058 10,908 $ 3,850 Estimate until July 2014 443 41900 -31100 General Property Taxes 2,511,817 2,590,453 2,743,280 2,907,228 $ 163,948 444 445 TOTAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE 2,511,817 2,590,453 2,750,338 2,918,136 $ 167,798 6.101% 446 447 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 3,195,033 3,465,860 3,327,280 3,645,478 $ 318,198 4481 1 449 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE TAX LEVY 274,662 330,281 363,420 440,727 $ 77,307 2015 Bond schedule + 5% 450 451 TOTAL ALL REVENUES 3,469,695 3,796,141 3,690,700 4,086,205 $ 395,505 452 453 TOTAL ALL EXPENSES 3,275,960 3,506,230 3,690,358 4,086,205 $ 395,847 4541 1 455 456 REVENUE - EXPENSE 193,735 289,911 342 (0) $ (342) 457 458 459 Estimated Year End Reserve 342 (0) $ (342) 460 461 462 TOTAL CERTIFIED LEVY 2,781,119 2,920,734 3,106,700 3,347,955 $ 241,255 7.766% 10a. v' CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E -mail - en�eral(aki.corcoran.mmus / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us MEMO Date: July 18, 2014 To: City Council From: Brad Martens, City Administrator Re: Administration Department Staffing The draft 2015 budget includes an additional full -time staff member within the Administration Department. It is recommended that this position be added in order to meet the needs of the community as well as the goals and objectives of the City Council. The Administration Department is currently made up of four full -time Employees: • City Administrator • City Clerk • Administrative Support/Payroll and Benefits Coordinator • Code Compliance Official The department serves in a variety of capacities to support the City Council, other City departments, and is the primary contact for the community for non - emergency items. The activity of the department has increased significantly over the last year due to increased development activity and additional requirements of the staff as assigned by the City Council and City Administrator. The department is beyond its capacity to keep at the current pace long -term and unable to take on additional initiatives without further support. It is recommended that an additional full -time staff be added to the department. For the past year I have been keeping a list of projects that need to be taken on by the Administration Department. Some of them are as follows: • Financial plan management • Business outreach meetings • Increase communication with residents/business owners • MS4 /SWPPP requirements • Elm Creek Watershed meetings • Upcoming projects o Ravinia o TIF /Downtown project • Ordinance/Policy updates /research o Park Dedication o Street naming • Sidewalk/trail snow removal • Stormwater utility fee • Gambling • Solid waste (garbage /recycling) • Tree Preservation • Possible legislative push (bonding, policy, etc.) • Employee handbook update • Capital Improvement Plan update • Organizational succession planning The above list is a sampling of additional items that require additional Administration Department time above and beyond day to day operations. It is recommended that the position be titled Assistant to the City Administrator and report directly to the City Administrator. The position would be non - exempt and non - supervisory. As proposed the new employee would begin with the City effective July 1, 2015. This would allow for time to formalize a job description over the next several months with a hiring process beginning in May 2015. I would be happy to answer any questions the City Council may have. Brad Martens, City Administrator STAFF REPORT Agenda Item. 11 d. Council Meeting: Prepared By: July 24, 2014 Brad Martens Topic: Action Required: Request for Proposals — Residential Approval Recycling Services Summary: The City of Corcoran has an existing three year contract with Randy's Sanitation, Inc. to provide residential recycling services which expires on December 31, 2014. The contract states "Contract may be re -bid or re- quoted at the end of the contract." According to the City Attorney, the City must re -bid for services. Attached to this report is a Request for Proposals (RFP) for residential recycling service. Staff requests the City Council approve the RFP and direct staff to seek proposals for residential recycling services. Financial /Budget: Recycling services are paid by the City and billed to individual properties. The City annually sets the recycling rate as part of the fee schedule. The new contract will dictate the recycling fee for 2015. Alignment with Values: This item relates to the following adopted values: EXCELLENCE AND QUALITY IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES We believe that service to the public is our reason for being, and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional, cost - effective, and friendly manner. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We believe that fiscal responsibility, and the prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. TREATING THE CITIZEN AS OUR CUSTOMER We believe that citizens are our customers and should be treated with courtesy, respect, and deserve the best services we can provide. Options: 1. Approve the Request for Proposals and direct staff to seek proposals for residential recycling services. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Page 2 Recommendation: Approve the Request for Proposals and direct staff to seek proposals for residential recycling services. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve the Request for Proposals and direct staff to seek proposals for residential recycling services. Attachments: 1. Request for Proposals for Residential Recycling Services City of Corcoran Request for Proposals (RFP) For Residential Recycling Services July 24, 2014 1. INTRODUCTION This request for proposals (RFP) defines the service standards, specifications and proposal requirements of the residential recycling collection program for the City of Corcoran, Minnesota. City of Corcoran shall be hereinafter referred to as the "City ". The City seeks to enter into a recycling contract with a company that has the resources and ability to provide residential recyclable materials collection services for the City. It is the intent of the City to accept and evaluate proposals for residential recycling services including collection, processing, and marketing. The goals of the City are to maximize the fullest recovery possible of recyclable materials from all residents and to achieve the most cost - effective solution. The City encourages Proposers to submit their best proposal possible. Proposers may alter the requirements within this RFP if proposals explicitly describe the change, rationale and price implications. For example, Proposers may propose multiple design scenarios. Each scenario proposed must have a distinct, associated price. Proposers may elect to propose to include "revenue sharing" in their price formula. This proposal option is present in each of the scenarios. Proposers may also elect to not include revenue sharing such that their proposed service charges reflect a "flat fee" approach whereby the Proposer intends to keep all revenue from sale of recyclable materials. This RFP does not imply, and should not be interpreted to imply, a proposed set of final contract terms. A final contract will be negotiated with the successful contractor. This RFP and the successful proposal will be a basis for these negotiations. The final contract shall supersede and replace this RFP and successful proposal, unless agreed to otherwise. 2. BACKGROUND The City's current recycling contract requires single - family households to be serviced on the frequencies and schedules described in Table 1. Table 1 Collection Frequency and Days City Collection Frequency Collection Day of Week Corcoran Bi- Weekly Tuesday The current collection days for the City shall be maintained under the new Contract. The current demographics of the City are listed in Table 2. 2 Table 2 Demographics City Population Curbside Single Multi - Recycling Family Family Household Homes Dwelling Counts Units Corcoran 5,471 1801 1 867 0 The City currently has a single- stream recycling program for fiber and rigid containers. Paper products accepted in the City's recycling programs include old newspaper (ONP), old magazines (OMG) including catalogs, old corrugated containers (OCC), household office paper and mail (HOPM), old boxboard (OBB), phone books, paperback books, and notebooks. Rigid containers accepted in the program include glass bottles and jars, plastic bottles with a neck, steel food cans, and aluminum cans. 3. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL COLLECTIONS 3.1 Proposer Service Requirements The Proposer agrees to provide residential recycling services to all single - family households in the City. Additionally, the Proposer agrees to provide residential recycling services to Maple Hill Estates through a direct contract negotiated between the Proposer and Maple Hill Estates. 3.2 Collection Vehicle Equipment Requirements All collection vehicles used in performance of the contract shall be duly licensed and inspected by the State of Minnesota and shall operate within the weight allowed by Minnesota Statutes. Each collection vehicle shall be equipped with the following: a. Two -way communications device. b. First aid kit. An approved 2A1 OBC Dry Chemical Fire Extinguisher. d. Warning flashers. Warning alarms to indicate movement in reverse. f. Signs on the rear of the vehicle which states "This Vehicle Makes Frequent Stops ". g. A broom and shovel for cleaning up spills. All of the required equipment must be in proper working order. All vehicles must be maintained in proper working order and be as clean and free from odors as possible. All vehicles must be clearly identified on both sides with Proposer's name and telephone number. 3.3 Personnel Requirements Proposer shall retain sufficient personnel and equipment to fulfill the requirements and specifications of the services described in this RFP. The Proposer will provide a Route Supervisor to oversee the recycling route drivers servicing the City. The Route Supervisor will 3 be available to address customer concerns each day. The Proposer shall have a dispatch customer service representative on duty Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m to receive customer calls and route issues. The Proposer shall provide a 24 -hour answering service line or device to receive customer calls. The Route Supervisor and all collection vehicles must be equipped with 2 -way communication devices. Proposer's personnel will be trained both in program operations and in customer service and insure that all personnel maintain a positive attitude with the public and in the work place and shall: a) Conduct themselves at all times in a courteous manner and use no abusive or foul language. b) Perform their duties in accordance with all existing laws and ordinances and future amendments thereto of the Federal, State of Minnesota, and local governing boards. c) Be clean and presentable in appearance, as so far as possible. d) Wear a uniform and employee identification badge or name tag. e) Drive in a safe and considerate manner. f) Manage containers in a careful manner, by picking them up, emptying their contents into the collection vehicle, and placing — not throwing or sliding — the container back in its curbside location so as to avoid spillage and littering or damage to the container. g) Monitor for any spillage and be responsible for cleaning up any litter or breakage. h) Avoid damage to property. i) Not perform their duties or operate vehicles while consuming alcohol or illegally using controlled substances or while under the influence of alcohol and/or such substances. j) Be in possession of a valid MN CDL 3.4 Point of Collection Except for municipal facilities, all recyclable material collection service will occur at the curbside. 3.5 Recycling Containers Proposer shall provide containers for use in single- stream collection programs. The Proposer will maintain an inventory of new and replacement containers and will be required to service and repair damaged containers. Proposer shall maintain sufficient cart inventory of various sizes to meet supply and demand needs for the entire term of the contract. The standard cart size shall be approximately 60- gallons. The carts shall be uniform and consistent in color and design and have a recycling symbol and approved instruction label attached, so as to be easily identified by the resident /customer and the Proposer Driver as the container for recyclable materials collection. Carts approximately thirty and ninety - gallons in size shall be of similar design and shall be provided to residents who request a different level of service. Additional carts will be provided at no extra charge to residents who request them. M Each cart will be delivered with a package of recycling information provided by the Proposer and approved by the City explaining what and how to recycle using the single- stream method. The Driver is required to record and report to Proposer dispatch the location of any cart that is damaged and that cart shall be repaired or replaced by the Proposer or designated subcontractor within one (1) week of the report of damage. 3.6 Collection Recycling carts shall be placed by the residents at curbside on collection day, with the handle toward the house and the lid opening toward street. The Proposer shall collect from each participating household, all acceptable materials that have been prepared according to publicized procedures. The driver is required to place the emptied cart back down in the same curbside location as set by the resident. In no case is the cart to be left in the street. The City assumes that all residents receiving single- stream curbside collection service will be collected once every two weeks. 3.7 City Retains Right to Specify Resident Preparation Instructions The Proposer shall agree that it is the City's sole right to clearly specify the resident sorting and setout requirements. Such information shall be included in the City's newsletters and web pages as well as any public education pieces distributed by the Proposer with approval from the City. 3.8 Procedure for Unacceptable Recyclable Materials If Proposer determines that a resident has set out unacceptable or non - targeted recyclable materials, the driver shall use the following procedures: Driver Education Tag Proposer shall leave the non - targeted materials in the resident's curbside recycling bin and leave a City approved "education tag" indicating acceptable materials and the proper method of preparation. Recording Addresses with Unacceptable Materials The driver shall record the address on forms acceptable to the City. Proposer shall report the address to the City contact at the end of each collection week. If this procedure for handling non - targeted materials is not feasible , the Proposer must so specify and explain alternative public education system to maintain and improve quality of recyclable materials set out by residents. 3.9 Collection Hours Proposer shall maintain sufficient equipment and personnel to assure that all collection operations commence no earlier than 7:00 a.m. and are completed by 6:00 p.m. on the scheduled collection day. 5 3.10 Cleanup Responsibilities Proposer shall adequately clean up any materials spilled or blown during the course of collection and/or hauling operations. All collection vehicles shall be equipped with a broom and shovel for use in cleaning up any spills. Any unacceptable materials left behind should be secured within resident's recycling container, if provided. Driver shall take all precautions possible to prevent littering of unacceptable recyclable materials. Proposer shall have no responsibility to remove any items that are not recyclable materials. 3.11 Missed Collection Policy & Procedures In the City's public education information, residents will be directed to call the Proposer for missed collections and other service issues. The Proposer shall designate a staff person as an account representative for the City. A direct phone number (e.g., cellular phone, etc.) shall be provided for City staff to use for purposes of communicating immediate service needs. The Proposer shall also designate a back -up contact person, including a corresponding second, direct phone number. These Proposer phone numbers will not be published in public education literature, but rather used by City administrative staff. The Proposer shall have a duty to pick up missed collections. Proposer agrees to pick up all missed collections on the same day that the Proposer receives notice of a missed collection, provided notice is received by Proposer before 11:00 a.m. on a business day. With respect to all notices of a missed collection received after 11:00 a.m. on a business day, Proposer agrees to pick up that missed collection before 6:00 p.m. on the business day immediately following. Proposer shall provide staffing of a telephone- equipped office to receive missed collection complaints between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays, except holidays. The Proposer shall have an answering machine or voice mail system activated to receive phone calls after hours. Proposer shall keep a log of all calls, including the subject matter, the date and time received, the Proposer's response, and the date and time of response. This information shall be provided to the City in a monthly report. 3.12 Non - Completion of Collection and Extension of Collection Hours If the Proposer determines that the collection of recyclable materials will not be completed by 6:00 p.m. on the scheduled collection day, Proposer shall notify the City's contact person by 3:30 p.m., and request an extension of the collection hours. Proposer shall inform the City of the areas not completed, the reason for non - completion, and the expected time of completion. 3.13 Severe Weather Recycling collections may be postponed due to severe weather at the sole discretion of the Proposer. Upon postponement, collection will be made on a day agreed upon between the Proposer and the City. 3.14 Annual Recycling Calendar, Holidays The City shall publish the yearly calendars including alternate collection days, with assistance from the Proposer. Holidays refers to any of the following: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and any other holidays mutually agreed to by the 2 City and Proposer. In no instance will there be more than one holiday during a collection week. When the scheduled collection day falls on a holiday, collection for that day will be collected one day later. 3.15 Weighing of Loads Proposer will keep accurate records consisting of an approved weight slip or electronic equivalent with the date, time, collection route, driver's identification, vehicle number, tare weight, gross weight, net weight, and number of recycling stops for each loaded vehicle. Collection vehicles will be weighed quarterly or semi - annually to obtain a tare weight. Paper or electronic versions of each weight ticket shall be maintained on file by the Proposer for at least three years in the event of an audit by the City. 3.16 Unauthorized Collection Only a licensed recycling hauler under contract with the City or with the property owner shall collect, remove, or dispose of recyclables after they have been set out for collection. The City's recycling Proposer's employees may not collect or scavenge through recycling in any manner that interferes with the contracted recycling services. The Proposer shall report to the City any instances of suspected scavenging or unauthorized removal of recyclable materials from any collection containers. 3.17 Utilities The Proposer shall be obligated to protect all public and private utilities whether occupying street or public or private property. If such utilities are damaged by reason of the Proposer's operations, under the executed contract, he /she shall repair or replace same, or failing to do so promptly, the City shall cause repairs or replacement to be made and the cost of doing so shall be deducted from payment to be made to the Proposer. 3.18 Damage to Property The Proposer shall take all necessary precautions to protect public and private property. Except for reasonable wear and tear, the Proposer shall repair or replace any private or public property, including, but not limited to sod, mailboxes, or recycling bins, which are damaged by the Proposer. Such property damage shall be addressed for repair or replacement, at no charge to the property owner, within forty -eight (48) hours with property of the same or equivalent value at the time of the damage. If the Proposer fails to address the repair or replacement damaged property within forty -eight (48) hours, the City may, but shall not be obligated to, repair or replace such damaged property, and the Proposer shall fully reimburse the City for any of its reasonably incurred expenses. The Proposer shall reimburse the City for any such expenses within ten (10) days of receipt of the City's invoice. 3.19 Municipal Facilities The Proposer will provide free recycling service, at least every other week at the City's municipal building, 8200 Co Rd 116,; primary Public Works facility, 9100 County Road 19, secondary Public Works facility, 9525 Cain Road; and City Park, 20200 County Road 50 7 (seasonal use including Country Daze festival). In general, the Proposer will provide carts (wheeled carts with lids, with approximately 60- gallons capacity) or other mutually agreed upon containers to facilitate that service. The carts shall be labeled by the Proposer with appropriate stickers to identify the acceptable recyclable commodities. 3.20 Reports Materials Reports The Proposer will report, on a monthly and yearly basis, the following information regarding the City's recyclable materials quantities (in tons): • Number of curbside recycling "stops" (i.e., number of households with recyclables set out at the curb) per collection (i.e., weekly or bi- weekly stop count); • Gross amounts of materials collected, by recyclable material; • Net amounts of materials marketed, by recyclable material; • Amounts stored, by recyclable material, with any notes as to unusual conditions; • Amounts of process residuals disposed • Composition of process residuals disposed; and • Revenue share credits back to the City (if any). Monthly reports shall be due to the City by the 15th day of each month for material collected by the Proposer during the preceding calendar month. Annual reports to the City shall be due by the last day of January for materials received by the Proposer during the preceding calendar year. The Proposer will be encouraged to include in its annual report recommendations for continuous improvement in the City's recycling programs (e.g., public education, reduction of non - targeted materials, etc.). Monthly Customer Relations Report Each month the Proposer shall provide the City with the following reports: • A list of all customer complaints, including a description of how each complaint was resolved. • A list of all addresses where education tags were left for residents and why the tags were left. • A list of all missed pick ups reported to the Proposer. The monthly reports shall be sent by mail, fax or e -mail to the City's contact person. 3.21 Publicity, Promotion, and Education City - Provided Public Education The City shall prepare and distribute recycling information to residents each year. For example, the City may produce brochures with the annual calendar of recycling collection dates, include articles in their municipal newsletters, and /or include recycling instructions on their web sites. Proposer — Provided Public Education The Proposer shall conduct its own promotions and public education to increase participation and improve compliance with City - specified resident preparation instructions. At a minimum, this shall include distribution of resident education tags to be left by curbside collection crews if any non - targeted material is rejected and left at the curb. The Proposer shall submit a draft of any public education literature for approval by the City, at least one (1) month before printing and distribution of any such literature. 4. MATERIALS PROCESSING AND MARKETING 4.1 Processing Facilities Must Be Specified It is intended that all recyclable materials collected by the Proposer will go to recycling markets to be manufactured into recycled content products. The Proposer shall assure the City that adequate recyclable material processing capacity will be provided for material collected. The proposals must clearly specify the location(s) of its recyclable materials processing facility (or subcontractor's facility) where material collected from the City will be delivered and/or processed. The Proposer shall provide written notice to the City at least 60 days in advance of any substantial change in these or subsequent plans for receiving and processing recyclable materials collected from the City. Upon collection, the City's Proposer shall deliver the designated recyclable materials to a recyclable material processing center, an end market for sale or reuse, or to an intermediate collection center for later delivery to a processing center or end market. It is unlawful for any person to transport for disposal or to dispose of designated recyclable materials in a mixed municipal solid waste disposal facility. Proposer shall assure that all recyclable materials collected in the City are not landfilled, composted or incinerated except for process residuals. The Proposer shall dispose of no more than 7% of material (by weight) as process residuals as part of recyclable materials processing operations. No recyclable materials will be landfilled, composted or incinerated by the Proposer without written authorization from the City and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency / Office of Environmental Assistance. 4.2 Lack of Adequate Market Demand In the event that the market for a particular recyclable material ceases to exist, or becomes economically depressed that it becomes economically unfeasible to continue collection, processing and marketing of that particular material, the Proposer shall give written notice to the City. The notice shall include information demonstrating the effort the Proposer has made to find market sources, and the financial information justifying the conclusion that the market is economically unfeasible. At such conclusion, the City and the Proposer will both agree in writing that it is no longer appropriate to collect such item before collection ceases. 9 Proposer shall pay the costs of all disposal of any item collected that is deemed not recyclable by Proposer and the City due to lack of adequate market demand. The City and Proposer shall specify a date in the said written agreement to cease collection of the recyclable material in question. Proposer shall at all times be under a duty to minimize recyclable materials ending up in landfill or incineration. If such disposal becomes necessary, Proposer shall dispose of the materials at a facility specified in writing by the City or an alternative agreed upon by the City and the Proposer. 4.3 Estimating Materials Composition as Collected The Proposer shall conduct at least one materials composition analysis of the City's recyclable materials each year to estimate the relative amount by weight of each recyclable commodity by grade or offer a suitable alternative to a composition analysis. 4.4 Estimating Process Residuals The Proposer shall provide the City a written description of the means to estimate process residuals derived from the City's recyclable materials. This written description shall be updated by the Proposer immediately after any significant changes to the processing facilities used by the Proposer. 4.5 Performance Monitoring The City will monitor the performance of the Proposer against goals and performance standards required within this RFP and in the contract. Substandard performance as determined by the City will constitute non - compliance. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by the Proposer within 60 days after being notified by the City, the City may initiate the contract termination procedures. 5. PAYMENT AND DAMAGES 5.1 Compensation for Services The City agrees to pay the Proposer for recycling collection services provided to the City as described in the Proposer's proposal, and made part of an executed contract, based on the number of household units certified by the City. By November 1St of each year the City will review the number of certified units and notify Proposer of any changes. Proposer shall submit itemized bills for recycling collection services provided to the City on a monthly basis. Bills submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City. 5.2 Revenue Sharing All qualified proposals shall state explicitly if the Proposer elects to participate in revenue sharing with the City. If the City awards its contract to a Proposer that has elected to propose revenue sharing, and if the final contract negotiated includes revenue sharing, the Proposer shall, on a monthly basis, rebate an amount to that City based on a mutually agreed upon formula. If a revenue sharing component is offered for any commodity, each month the Proposer shall provide adequate documentation of the revenue sharing rebate calculation, including monthly estimates of: tons for all commodities, monthly index prices, margin prices, and total net revenue 10 share amounts. The City understands that at times of poor market conditions, net revenues may equal zero, but shall not go negative. The City shall not be charged for net revenue sharing, only credited or neutral (e.g., $0 per ton). i.e., the Margin Price shall serve as the effective "floor price" for net revenue by commodity. The Proposer shall provide copies of the referenced published Index Prices with each monthly invoice statement. The Proposers shall clearly describe their means for allocating recyclable tonnage to the City in their proposals. The Proposers shall also provide a detailed explanation of how the tonnage "split" estimates will be calculated for each commodity. 5.3 Liquidated Damages The Proposer shall agree, in addition to any other remedies available to the City, that the City may withhold payment from the Proposer in the amounts specified below as liquidated damages for failure of the Proposer to fulfill its obligations. The following acts or omissions shall be considered a breach of the contract: a) Failure to respond to legitimate service complaints within 24 hours in a reasonable and professional manner - $50 per incident. b) Failure to collect properly notified missed collections (as per Section 3.11 of this REP) - $250 per incident. c) Failure to provide monthly and annual reports (as per Section 3.20 of this REP) - $100 per incident. d) Failure to complete the collections within the specified timeframes (as per Sections 3.9 and 3.12 of this RFP) - $100 per incident e) Failure to clean up from spills during collection operations (as per Section 3.10 of this RFP) - $250 per incident f) Failure to report on changes in location of recyclable materials processing operations - $250 per incident. The Proposer shall be liable for liquidated damages amount(s) upon determination of the City that performance has occurred that is not consistent with the provisions of the contract. The City shall notify Proposer in writing or electronically of each act or omission discovered by the City. It shall be the duty of the Proposer to take whatever steps or action may be necessary to remedy the cause of the complaint. The City may deduct the full amount of any damages from any payment due to the Proposer. The remedy available to the City under this paragraph shall be in addition to all other remedies which the City may have under law or at equity. Exceptions: For the purposes of this RFP and subsequent contract, the Proposer shall not be deemed to be liable for penalties where its inability to perform recycling collection service is the result of conditions beyond the control of the Proposer, including but not limited to civil disorder, acts of God, inclement weather severe enough that trucks cannot safely take collections, provided however, that the Proposer shall obtain the approval for the delay from the City's contact person or their designee prior to 3:30 p.m. of the scheduled collection day. 11 6. INSURANCE AND OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 6.1 Insurance Insurance secured by the Proposer shall be issued by insurance companies acceptable to the City and admitted in Minnesota. The insurance specified may be in a policy or policies of insurance, primary or excess. Such insurance shall be in force on the date of execution of the contract and shall remain continuously in force for the duration of the contract. The Proposer must obtain the following insurance coverage with these minimum levels of coverage: Worker's Compensation Insurance: Proposer's Public Liability Insurance Property Damage: Automotive Insurance: 6.2 Worker's Compensation Statutory $500,000 each/person $1,500,000 each/occurrence $500,000 each/person $1,500,000 each/occurrence $1,500,000 aggregate The Proposer shall provide evidence of Workers Compensation insurance covering all employees of the Proposer and subcontractors engaged in the performance of the contract, in accordance with the Minnesota Workers Compensation Law. 6.3 Employee Working Conditions and Respondent's Safety Procedures The Proposer will ensure adequate working conditions and safety procedures are in place to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. The City reserves the right to inspect on a random basis all trucks, equipment, facilities, working conditions, training manuals, records of claims for Worker's Compensation or safety violations and standard operating procedures documents. 6.4 Equal Opportunity During the performance of the executed contract, the Proposer, in compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and Department of Labor Regulations 41 CFR, Part 60, shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Proposer shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants for employment are qualified, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such prohibition against discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 12 In the event of noncompliance with the non - discrimination clauses of this contract, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended, in whole or part, in addition to other remedies as provided by law. 6.5 Compliance with Laws & Regulations In providing services hereunder and in the executed contract, the Proposer shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the provision of services to be provided hereunder. Any violation shall constitute a material breach of the executed contract. 6.6 Governing Law The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all interpretations of this contract, and the appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation which may arise hereunder will be in those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, regardless of the place of business, residence or incorporation of the Proposer. 6.7 Waiver Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of the executed contract shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of the executed contract. 6.8 Termination The City may cancel the contract if the Proposer fails to fulfill its obligations under the contract in a proper and timely manner, or otherwise violates the terms of the contract if the default has not been cured after 90 days written notice has been provided. The City shall pay Proposer all compensation earned prior to the date of termination minus any damages and costs incurred by the City as a result of the breach. If the contract is canceled or terminated, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, maps, models, photographs, reports or other materials prepared by the Proposer as specified in this RFP shall, at the option of the City, become the property of the City, and the Proposer shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents or materials prior to the termination. 6.9 Severability The provisions of the executed contract are severable. If any portion hereof and in the executed contract is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction, to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of the same contract. 6.10 Accounting Standards The Proposer agrees to maintain the necessary source documentation and enforce sufficient internal controls as dictated by generally accepted accounting practices to properly account for expenses incurred under this contract. 13 6.11 Retention of Records The Proposer shall retain all records pertinent to expenditures incurred under this contract for a period of three years after the resolution of all audit findings. Records for non - expendable property acquired with funds under this contract shall be retained for three years after final disposition of such property. 6.12 Data Practices The Proposer agrees to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and all other applicable state and federal laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. The Proposer must immediately report to the City any requests from third parties for information relating to the contract. The City agrees to promptly respond to inquiries from the Proposer concerning data requests. The Proposer agrees to hold the City, its officers, and employees harmless from any claims resulting from the Proposer's unlawful disclosure or use of data protected under state and federal laws. Only the company names of Proposers submitting proposals will be made public. All proposal documents shall be held as confidential until the City Council awards a new contract and authorizes staff to execute the new contract. 6.13 Inspection of Records and Disclosure All Proposer records with respect to any matters as specified in this RFP and subsequent contract agreements shall be made available to the City or its duly authorized agents at any time during normal business hours, as often as the City deems necessary to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data. Any reports, information, data, etc. given to, prepared, or assembled by the Proposer under a future contract shall not be made available by the Proposer to any other person or party without the City's prior written approval. All finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, photographs, and reports prepared by the Proposer shall become the property of the City upon termination of the City's contract with the Proposer. 6.14 Independent Contractor Nothing contained in this RFP is intended to, or shall be construed in any manner, as creating or establishing the relationship of employer /employee between the parties. The Proposer shall at all times remain an independent Contractor with respect to the services to be performed under this contract. Any and all employees of Proposer or other persons engaged in the performance of any work or services required by Proposer under this contract shall be considered employees or sub- contractors of the Proposer only and not of the City; and any and all claims that might arise, including Worker's Compensation claims under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota or any other state, on behalf of said employees or other persons while so engaged in any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of Proposer. 6.15 Transfer of Interest The Proposer shall not assign any interest in the contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the contract either by assignment or novation, without the prior written approval of the City. The Proposer shall not subcontract any services under this contract without prior written approval of 14 the City. Failure to obtain such written approval by the City prior to any such assignment or subcontract shall be grounds for immediate contract termination. 6.16 Non - Assignability The parties hereby agree that Proposer shall have no right to assign or transfer its rights and obligations without written approval from the City. 6.17 Bankruptcy In the event the Proposer, its successors or assigns files for Bankruptcy as provided by federal law, the recycling service agreement shall be immediately deemed null and void relieving all parties of their contract rights and obligations. 6.18 Indemnification The Proposer agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers and employees, from any liabilities, claims, damages, costs, judgments, and expenses, including attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from an act or omission of the Proposer, its employees, its agents, or employees of subcontractors, in the performance of the services provided by this contract or by reason of the failure of the Contractor to fully perform, in any respect, any of its obligations under this contract. If a Contractor is a self - insured agency of the State of Minnesota, the terms and conditions of Minnesota Statute 3.732 et seq. shall apply with respect to liability bonding, insurance and liability limits. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 shall apply to other political subdivisions of the State of Minnesota. 6.19 Performance & Payment Bond Proposer shall execute and deliver to the City a Performance and Payment Bond with the corporate surety in the sum of $25,000 or equal ("equal" may include a Letter of Credit from a banking institute approved by the City). The contract shall not become effective until such a bond, in a form acceptable to the City, has been delivered to the City and approved by the City Attorney. The executed contract shall be subject to termination by the City at any time if said bond shall be cancelled or the surety thereon relieved from liability for any reason. The term of such performance bond shall be for the life of the executed contract. Extensions or renewals shall require the execution and delivery of a performance bond in the above amount to cover the period of extension or renewal. 6.20 Conflict of Interest Proposer agrees that no member, officer, or employee of the City shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the executed contract or the proceeds thereof. Violation of this provision shall cause the executed contract to be null and void and the Proposer will forfeit any payments to be made under the executed contract. 6.21 Entire Contract The future, executed contract supersedes all verbal agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, 15 or waivers of the provisions of the executed contract shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 6.22 Contract Conditions The City reserves the right to waive minor irregularities in the proposal documents and to reject any or all proposals. The City reserves the right to enter into a contract with a Proposer who does not submit the lowest cost proposal. The Proposer shall be required to execute the City's contract and to fulfill the requirements contained within it. The Bond and Certificate of Insurance shall be provided when the contract is executed. The Proposer shall review and return signed copies of the contract within 30 days of receipt of the contract. 7. TERM OF CONTRACT The term of the new recycling contract for the City will be a period of thirty -six (36) months from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. 8. SUBMITTING PROPOSALS 8.1 Requests for Clarification Questions, requests for clarification or requests for information about this RFP or process must be submitted in writing to the City by 4:00 p.m. Central Time, on Monday, August 18, 2014. All questions and requests for more information and the City's responses will be summarized in writing and forwarded to all other qualified Proposers prior to 4:00 p.m., on Friday, August 22, 2014. Any other unauthorized contact with other City staff or City Council members will subject the company to disqualification from further consideration. This restriction will be in effect from the date this RFP is finalized and released through the date of final contract award (including authorization for execution) by the City Council. 8.2 Proposers May Team with Other Companies It is recognized that some prospective haulers may wish to subcontract with other companies for processing services. This is allowed as needed, but all such Proposer- subcontractor relationships must be explicitly described in each proposal scenario. The City will contract with only one primary Contractor for the recycling services. Multiple Proposers may team up with other complementary hauling or recycling companies provided there is no collusion. A company may be listed as a part of more than one team as long as this company submits a written certification that no collusion occurred between competing proposals. 8.3 How to Submit Proposals Proposals shall be submitted to the City no later than 3:00 p.m. Central Time, on Friday, August 29, 2014, to be considered eligible and will be opened at that time. Proposals shall be submitted in a sealed envelope with the name of the proposing company on the outside and addressed as follows: 16 Enclosed: City of Corcoran Attn: Recycling Service Proposals 8200 Co Rd 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Proposals will be treated in accordance with Mn. Statutes 13.591, Subdivision 3 (b), Data Practices Act. Proposers must include two (2) printed copies. Only the company names of Proposers submitting proposals will be made public. All proposal documents shall be held as confidential until the City Council awards a new contract and authorizes staff to execute the new contract. 8.4 Proposal Content Qualified proposals must include at least the following elements: • Statement of Proposer qualifications, including at least three references (contact names and phone numbers) of other municipal clients in the Twin Cities metropolitan region receiving similar services. • List of Principal Officers' names, addresses and contact numbers (telephone, e -mail, and fax). • List of materials proposed to be collected and a discussion and rationale for any proposed changes to the City's standard list of recyclable materials. • Description of operations at materials processing facility where recyclable materials will be taken including location, hours of operation and capacity. • Description of how stop counts (i.e., number of set -outs per collection) will be tallied. • Description of how recyclable tonnages will be allocated to each City (e.g., a standard, assumed amount per stop, etc.). • Description of how recyclable material "splits" by commodity will be calculated • Description of how process residuals amounts and composition will be estimated 8.5 Alternative Proposals Proposers may submit alternative proposals that are different from the above REP — specified, single stream design. These alternative proposals must include explicit descriptions in a similar level of detail as specified within this RFP. For example, the alternative proposals must include: resident materials sorting /preparation requirements, collection frequency, cart size, cart ownership, etc. 8.6 Price Worksheet Prospective Proposers must complete a price worksheet as part of the proposal they submit (see Attachment B for worksheet). In addition, Proposers may complete additional price worksheets if their proposed system does not fit into the single - stream scenario. Proposers may fill in the price worksheets in Attachment B or use their own format. However, the Proposer- designed price worksheets must include an equal level of detail and content. 17 8.7 Proposals May Be Rejected in Whole or Part The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals or parts of proposals, to negotiate modifications of proposals submitted, to accept part or all of the proposals on the basis of consideration(s) other than proceeds or cost, and to negotiate specific work elements with a respondent into a project of lesser or greater expense and reimbursement than described in this RFP or the respondent's reply. 8.8 RFP and Proposal to Become Part of Final Contract The contents of this RFP, the successful proposal, and any written clarifications or modifications to the contents thereof submitted by the successful Proposer may become part of the contractual obligations and be incorporated by reference into the ensuing contract. If any provision of the contract is in conflict with the referenced RFP or proposal, the contract shall take precedent. 9. CONTRACTOR SELECTION PROCESS 9.1 Contractor Selection Process To the best of its ability, the City will use the following process for its decision - making: • City staff will review and analyze the details of the qualified submitted proposals. The City reserves the right to ask Proposers for additional information/clarification to better understand the proposals. City staff will recommend the top two (2) Proposers, in rank order of priority, to the City Council. • City staff will negotiate with the top ranked Proposer. If negotiations with top- ranked Proposer are not successful, the City may then initiate negotiations with the second ranked Proposer, and so on. • Once a draft contract has been successfully negotiated, City staff will present its recommendations to City Council. The City Council may then award the contract and authorize staff to execute it. • The new recycling contract will commence on January 1, 2015. 9.2 Evaluation Criteria The City will objectively evaluate the proposals submitted to determine the best value for the City and its residents. A comprehensive set of criteria will be used to quantify the merits of each proposal package, including (but not limited to): • Strength of qualifications of the Proposer (together with any proposed subcontractor, if any), especially related to the particular needs of the City. Qualifications will include (but not be limited to) the proven capacities of the Proposer (and any subcontractor) to meet the operational requirements of the City. • Comments from the Proposer's reference clients. • Innovations proposed to increase participation and recyclable material quantities collected. • Innovations proposed to improve public education about recycling to all residents. • The price of the recycling services. • Overall, net annual cost to the City • Responsiveness of the Proposer to all other provisions of this RFP. These evaluation criteria are not presented in any special order. No ranking of these criteria within this RFP is intended or implied. The City reserves the right to consider other criteria in their review of proposal. 19 Attachment A Recycling Tonnage by Material Type for 2013 Residential Recycling Tonnage — 2013 Curbside Single -Family Totals (in Tons) Fibers 320.33 115.52 Mixed Glass PLASTIC 39.06 Tin /Steel 16.57 ALUMINUM 14.20 TOTAL CURBSIDE TONS: 505.69 20 Attachment B Price Worksheets Instructions for City of Corcoran RFP Price Worksheets A price worksheet must be completed for each design scenario proposed Multiple design scenarios may be submitted. Please feel free to make multiple copies of the price worksheets as needed. Proposers may fill in the attached price worksheets or use their own similar format. However, the Proposer — designed price worksheets must include an equal level of detail and content. If the Proposer proposes under any alternate proposal design scenarios, the proposal must explicitly describe the collection service design (e.g., resident materials sorting/preparation requirements, collection frequency, cart size, cart ownership, etc.). Proposers may propose to participate in revenue sharing with the City at the Proposers discretion. Proposers shall indicate (i.e., "Yes" or "No ") if they propose to include revenue sharing. Economic evaluation of proposals will compare total, net annual costs to the City over the contract period. The basic revenue share formula specified within this RFP can be summarized as a portion of the Proposer's materials sales revenue from sale of all paper grades, aluminum, steel /tin cans and plastic bottles. Proposers may elect to share revenue on one, two, three or all four commodities. If revenue sharing is implemented, the six, published "Price Indexes" specified below shall be used as a means to simplify the accounting of the proposed revenue share. For all paper grades: • All paper grades —Waste News. com adjunct commodity pricing service: www.SecondaryFiberPricinz.com, Midwest / Central Region, Grade: PS 8 — Special De -ink Quality News, high side, price per short ton, baled, last published price of the month. For the specified rigid container commodities - Waste News.com adjunct commodity pricing service www .SecondaryMaterialsPricinjz.com, Chicago (Midwest / Central): • Metals: Steel cans (sorted, densified, $ per ton, delivered) • Metals: Aluminum cans (sorted, baled, cents per pound, delivered) • PET Plastics Bottles: (baled, cents per pound, picked ups • Natural HDPE Plastics Bottles: (baled, cents per pound, picked ups • Colored HDPE Plastics Bottles: (baled, cents per pound, picked up) (a) Note: (a) Plastics bottles composition of sub - grades shall be assumed to be: 50% PET, 25% Natural HDPE, 25% Colored HDPE. If Proposers elect to share revenue with the City, the Proposers shall quote their revenue share pricing in terms of their proposed "Margin Price" for each of their proposed revenue share commodities. The City will use the assumed tonnage and material splits in Attachment A for calculating the net revenue share back to the City from all Proposers. It is important to note that the City does not guarantee any minimum tonnage or any specific material splits. These are estimates only for purposes of this RFP and comparing the value of any revenue sharing proposals. A. Single Stream Collection Scenario "I Proposer's company name: Collection Price Proposed: Fill in your proposed price for each City proposed recycling services under this scenario. Fill in "NA" (not applicable) as the price for the City where the scenario does not apply under this design scenario. $ per household per month Revenue sharing proposed: Does your proposal include any form of revenue sharing? _Yes No If "Yes ", fill in your proposed Margin Price for one or more of the following commodities: Proposed paper Margin Price: $ per ton Proposed aluminum Margin Price: Cents per pound Proposed steel cans Margin Price: $ per ton Proposed PET plastic bottles Margin Price: Cents per pound Proposed natural HDPE plastic bottles Margin Price: Cents per pound Proposed colored HDPE plastic bottles Margin Price: Cents per pound Note: (1) For any single stream collection scenario, the proposal text accompanying this price worksheet must explicitly describe the collection service design (e.g., resident materials sorting/preparation requirements, collection frequency, cart size, cart ownership, etc.). B. Alternative Collection Scenario (Z) Proposer's company name: Collection Price Proposed: Fill in your proposed price for each City proposed recycling services under this scenario. Fill in "NA" (not applicable) as the price for the City where the scenario does not apply under this design scenario. $ per household per month Revenue sharing proposed: Does your proposal include any form of revenue sharing? _Yes No If "Yes ", fill in your proposed Margin Price for one or more of the following commodities: Proposed paper Margin Price: $ per ton Proposed aluminum Margin Price: Cents per pound Proposed steel cans Margin Price: $ per ton Proposed PET plastic bottles Margin Price: Cents per pound Proposed natural HDPE plastic bottles Margin Price: Cents per pound Proposed colored HDPE plastic bottles Margin Price: Cents per pound Note: (2) For any alternative collection scenario, the proposal text accompanying this price worksheet must explicitly describe the collection service design (e.g., resident materials sorting/preparation requirements, collection frequency, cart size, cart ownership, etc.).