Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-03-18 - Parks & Trails Agenda PacketCity of Corcoran Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission Agenda March 18, 2014 - 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval a. Agenda b. Minutes 02/18/2014* 4. Open Forum 5. Presentations 6. Reports/Information a. Active Corcoran Planning Applications* 7. Old/Unfinished Business 8. New Business a. PUD Sketch Plan for Peachtree Partners, LLC for 103-acre Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (PID 23-119-23-42-0003) (City File 14-005)* b. Sports Fundraiser Opportunity* c. Scoreboard Funding Request* 9. Subcommittee & Miscellaneous Reports a. City Council Liaison – Mayor Guenthner b. Athletic Association c. Park Dedication Fund* 10. Other Business 11. Announcements 12. Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet by Door. City of Corcoran Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission Minutes February 18, 2014 - 7:00 PM 3b. The Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission met on February 18, 2014, at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were, Commissioners - Anderson, Robran, Tessmer, Nybo, Regan, Meister, Krueger, and Student Commissioner Monzo, Arriving late – Commissioner Dale Also present were City Administrator Martens, Administrative Support/Payroll and Benefits Coordinator Smith-Arens, and Council Liaison Mayor Guenthner Commissioner Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval a. Agenda - ADDED 8d. Bat Rack Fund Raiser (Kevin Dale representing Athletic Association) Motion: made by Robran, seconded by Krueger to approve the agenda as presented Voting Aye: Anderson, Robran, Tessmer, Nybo, Regan, Meister, Krueger (Motion carried 7:0) b. Minutes 01/21/2014 Motion: made by Meister, seconded by Tessmer to approve the minutes as presented Voting Aye: Anderson, Tessmer, Nybo, Meister, (Motion carried 4:0) Abstained: Krueger, Robran, Regan 4. Open Forum Move to 7a. Unfinished business 5. Presentations - none 6. Reports/Information a. Active Corcoran Planning Applications –Informational no action required. Correction on #3 should be 103.3 acres 7. Old/Unfinished Business a. January 21, 2014 Open Forum Request – Concerns about Hunter Road Trail access. What was the intent behind the motion that was made at previous meeting. Present were residents Kathy Swanson, Bill and Anne Burges, Paul Kieser, Allen Schultz, Greg Ranfranz. A copy of the petition was presented to commissioners of which some resident felt the language used could have been misrepresented. Robran stated it was important to have 2nd access to easement trail. Motion: made by Robran and seconded by Dale to retain connectivity from the proposed Lennar development to the Hunter neighborhood through trails and easements as proposed within the Lennar. Voting Aye: Anderson, Robran, Tessmer, Nybo, Dale, Regan, Krueger, (Motion carried 7:0) Meister Abstained b. Added – Recap of the discussion from 1/21/2014 agenda, for the Sketch Plan Review of the Corcoran Mini storage trail (PID 25-119-23-44-0002 and 25-119-23-44-0003). 8. New Business a. Meeting Conduct – Discussion took place that the commission would like to continuing running at relaxed group participation with all commissioners being able to speak in turn. Clarification of motions. The chair would take control of meeting and open forum concerns or disputes. A horseshoe table set up would be tried to keep order for outside participants joining for open forum meetings. b. 2014 Tree Giveaway – Informational sheet was handed out to commissioners to select available saplings they felt would be the best trees for the tree giveaway in the spring. c. 2014 Agenda Planning – Mayor Guenthner stated future workshops will be held throughout the year. City of Corcoran Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission Minutes February 18, 2014 - 7:00 PM 3b. d. ADDED Bat Rack Fund Raiser - TABLED to next agenda 9. Subcommittee & Miscellaneous Reports a. City Council Liaison – Mayor Guenthner gave update on projects going on in the City. b. Athletic Association –Kevin Dale gave an update on Corcoran Athletic Association team registration, a successful pancake breakfast was held. Dale also briefed commissioner about funding’s for Snyder field for a board, installed price of $9,000 He will bring back more details later. c. Park Dedication Fund – The commission reviewed the funds 10. Other Business - none 11. Announcements - none Adjournment - Motion: made by Krueger and seconded by Tessmer to adjourn meeting. Voting Aye: Anderson, Robran, Tessmer, Nybo, Dale, Regan, Meister, Krueger, (Motion carried 8:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:45 pm. MEMORANDUM 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net DATE February 15, 2014 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1. Rockford School District Site Plan, Variances and Conditional Use Permit for a Baseball Field at 20400 County Road 50 (PID 23-119-23-34-001) (city file no. 13-023). The Parks Commission reviewed this at their meeting on October 15th and a public hearing was held at the Planning Commission on November 7th. On November 25th the City Council tabled this item to allow the applicant to try to address a number of issues. The applicant has been working with City staff, Peachtree Partners, who is proposing development on the Schendel property to the north, and the watershed to address a number of issues. The review period has been extended to May 1, 2014. We expect this revised application to be reviewed by the City Council on March 27th. 2. Corcoran Mini-Storage Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary PUD Development Plan, Preliminary Plat at 19219 and 19235 County Road 10 (PID 25-119-23-44-0002 and 25-119-23-44-0003) (city file 13-032). A sketch plan was reviewed by the City in August 2013 and comments were provided to the applicant. The applicant has taken those comments and prepared revised plans. This formal application is currently incomplete and the applicant has asked that the City process another round of sketch plan concepts in advance of their completing their application submittal. The PUD Sketch Plan (round 2) was reviewed by the Parks and Trails Commission on January 21st, by the Planning Commission on February 6th and will be reviewed by the Council on February 27th. 3. Maple Hill Estates 3rd Addition Preliminary and Final Plat (PID 24-119-23-43-0016 and 24-119-23- 43-0014) (city file 14-001). A site plan and variance was approved on April 25, 2013 for this project, but it was recently was determined that the new community center should be located on City property. The plat is required to adjust property lines. The preliminary plat is scheduled for a public hearing at the March 6th Planning Commission meeting. The City Council will review the preliminary and final plat on March 27th. 4. Kopperhead Ranch LLC Agriculture Preserve Designation and Initiate Expiration at 20471 Larkin Road (PID 26-119-23-31-0001 and 26-119-23-34-0001) (city file 14-002). Chris and Kristin Smith have requested that two parcels be enrolled in Agriculture Preserve and have also initiated expiration so that they will come out of Agriculture Preserve in 8 years. The property is located in the MUSA, but is not planned to be serviced until after expiration of the Agriculture Preserve designation. The City Council will review the request on March 27th. 5. Lennar Final Plat, Development Contract and Final PUD Development Plan for “Ravinia” (City file 14-003). Staff has assigned this file number because we have been meeting with the developer on issues related to the application. We expect a submittal for Phase I on February 18th. If this submittal is complete it could be scheduled for the March Parks Commission and April Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Agenda Item ____ Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 6. Peachtree Partners request for PUD Sketch Plan and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (City file 14-005). The application has a number of very significant Comprehensive Plan issues, including triggering the need for the County Road 10 realignment as shown in Comprehensive Plan and extension of municipal sewer and water to this site. The applicant is asking to reguide the 103-acre property from High Density Residential to Low Density Residential, which requires a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The City Council has informally reviewed this concept at December and January City Council meetings. This is scheduled for Parks Commission review on March 13th, Planning Commission public hearing on March 6th and City Council on March 27th. Also, there are a number of projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out: 1. Corcoran Business Park (city file 06-005). The City Council granted a one year extension to the final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and is still working to close out this project. Notably, we met with the land owner in February and may have a new development application for this site later this year. 2. Park Place Storage After-the-Fact Extension of Approvals (city file no. 10-008). On September 23, 2010, the City Council approved a site plan and conditional use permit amendment for Park Place Storage to construct the 18th and final mini-storage building on that site. The approvals expired on September 23, 2011. The conditions have been met and a building permit was issued in September. The applicant has completed most of the site work with final items to be completed and final inspection this spring. 3. Hope Ministries Conditional Use Permit for Cemetery and Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easement at 19951 Oswald Farm Road (city file 12-002). Hope Ministries has submitted a request for a conditional use permit to allow a cemetery west of the existing church. The application was approved by the City Council on March 22nd and site work had begun. The letter of credit for site improvements has been released but we are holding the escrow pending completion of the approved landscaping. 7. Schmid’s Hidden Valley 2nd Addition Topography/Wetland Waiver, Preliminary Plat and Final Plat at 21820 Oakdale Drive (PID 04-119-23-34-0007, 04-119-23-42-0002 and 04-119-23-42-0003) (City File No. 12-016). The application for topography and wetland delineation waiver was approved at the September 27th Council meeting. The preliminary plat and final plat were approved by the City Council on April 25th. The applicant requested a modification to one condition and the change was approved by the City Council on December 12th. The applicant has recorded the plat, staff has closed out the file and will now refund any remaining escrow. 8. Heinz Second Addition Preliminary and Final Plat at 20801 CR 117 (03-119-23-14-0002) (City file 13-003). A wetland and topographic waiver was approved on January 24th. This item was approved by the City Council action on April 25th. The applicant is working on complying with approval conditions so that they can get the final plat mylar signed and recorded. The applicant has site work to complete and then the escrow can be refunded. 9. Lano Equipment at 23580 Highway 55 Site Plan Amendment for Cold Storage. (31-119-23-34- 0007) (13-006). This item was approved by the City Council on July 11th. The building permit has been issued, but staff has determined that the building is not being built according the approved plans. The Code Enforcement Official is working to resolve the issue. No Certificate of Occupancy will be issued until the building is corrected. 10. Triden Ridge Estates Second Addition Preliminary Plat and Final Plat at 23425 CR 117 (city file 13-019). The landowner received a wetland delineation and topography waiver on June 27th. The application was reviewed by Parks Commission and Planning Commission. The City Council tabled their review at the October 24th meeting pending additional information from staff regarding the viability of the proposed horseback trail and questions about the interpretation of the park dedication policy. The Council approved this item at the November 25th meeting. The plat has been filed, staff has closed out the file and city will now refund any remaining escrow. MEMORANDUM 2 11. Meadow Creek Estates 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Easement Vacation (PID 06- 119-23-32-0005 and 06-119-23-34-0003) (City file 13-020). This plat was approved by the City Council on October 24th. The mylars have been signed and released for filing. The plat has been filed, staff has closed out the file and city will now refund any remaining escrow. 12. Ess Addition (city files 05-017, 08-003 and 12-024). The City Council granted an after-the-fact extension for this final plat at their November 29, 2012 meeting and a second extension at the November 25, 2013 meeting. The plat has been recorded and staff is working with the applicant to address any outstanding issues and close out the file/refund the escrow after wetland monuments and lot monuments are installed this spring. 13. Lennar Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for “Ravinia” (City file 13-025) (related files are infrastructure design files 13-026, -027 and -028). The application was approved by the City Council on December 23, 2013. The applicant is now working on addressing those conditions and preparing a Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat for approval this spring. 14. Ess Brothers Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for an accessory building at 9350 County Road (PID # 07-119-23-43-0004) (City File No. 13-031) The applicant is requesting approval for a 5,500 square feet detached, accessory building with 20-foot sidewalls. The City Council approved this item on January 23rd. The applicant must now file the resolution at the County and then staff will close out the file and refund any remaining escrow. The applicant may apply for a building permit after the resolution is recorded. 15. BNC Farms Grain Bin Certificate of Compliance at 20913 County Road 10 (PID 22-119-23-12- 0001) (city file 14-004). An after-the-fact certificate of compliance was administratively approved. Finally, there are a few projects that have not yet been started but have been identified as action items or future projects: 1. Sign Ordinance Update. At the April 25th Council meeting, the City reviewed a request for the city to initiate a sign ordinance update. Specifically, they requested that the City review the ordinance standards relating to sign area, sign height and internal illumination and, because this is a city-wide issue, that the ordinance update be completed by the City out of the City funds. The Council discussed the issue and directed staff to bring a proposal back at a later date because the Council felt that this was a significant undertaking that would involve much more than this one issue. We will work with the City Administrator to determine the appropriate meeting to have this considered. 2. Design Guideline Update for Southeast District/Downtown. The Council approved a Landform proposal to update the existing design guidelines for this area. The design guidelines are adopted as part of the Zoning Ordinance and will be enforced as new development is proposed, consequently, the City Council wishes to revisit that planning effort to ensure it is still consistent with the City’s goals. The City Council appointed a subcommittee, but the City Council has decided to delay kickoff as we work through some associated issues as part of some new development plans. We expect to convene this subcommittee later this year. MEMORANDUM 3 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net TO: Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: March 10, 2014 for the March 18, 2014 Parks and Trails Commission Meeting RE: PUD Sketch Plan for Peachtree Partners, LLC for 103-acre Schendel property at 20400 County Road 10 (PID 23-119-23-42-0003) (City File 14-005) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: April 22, 2014 1. Application Request Peachtree Partners, LLC has submitted a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the 2030 Future Land Use Map and the Sanitary Sewer Phasing Plan, as well as a PUD sketch plan review f or approximately 231 single family detached homes on 103.3 acres. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment on March 6th and the City Council will review on March 27th. The Parks and Trails Commission should review and provide comments on the PUD sketch plan. 2. Context Background The applicant presented conceptually to the City Council on December 12, 2013 and January 23, 2014 to get feedback on the concepts prior to formal submittal. At the City Council’s direction, the applicant also had several meetings with city staff/consultants to review the Comprehensive Plan goals and identify issues. This plan is the result of those collaborative discussions. Staff finds that, other than the land use plan amendment requested, the applicant did incorporate most of the Comprehensive Plan goals into this PUD sketch plan. Zoning and Land Use The property is currently guided High Density Residential and Mixed Residential and zoned RMF-3 (High Density Residential) and UR (Urban Reserve). Agenda Item: Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties to the west are guided Low Density Residential and Mixed Residential and zoned UR. The properties to the north are guided Mixed Residential and High Density Residential and zoned UR. The properties to the east are guided Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-Public and are zoned UR and P-I (Public Institutional). The four parcels to the south (and north of County Road 10) are guided Commercial and zoned C-1 (neighborhood commercial). The property to the south across County Road 10 is guided Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi- Public and zoned P-I and UR. Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a number of low and medium quality wetlands scattered around the site. The wetland delineation was approved by Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission on January 3, 2014. A High Quality Natural Community is located in the north (Maple Basswood Forest) and east (Floodplain Forest) areas of the site. Rush Creek and an unnamed tributary are adjacent to or within the site; consequently, a portion of the site is in the shoreland overlay district. A portion of the site is also located in the floodplain. 3. Analysis of Request PUD Sketch Plan The sketch plan shows 231 single family lots on 103.3 acres (approximately 69.1 net acres). The proposed density is 3.34 units per acre (net, post-development). Natural Resources The submittal package includes a natural resource inventory and the applicant has generally done a nice job of preserving the natural resources on the north. The applicant has generally preserved this land as an outlot. However, staff notes that the forested area on the east side of the property is identified by the City as medium quality woodlands with a high value due to the proximity to creek and is proposed to be removed by the applicant who identifies it as low quality. Staff is concerned about the removal of what the City has identified as medium/high quality natural resources. The applicant has provided a woodlands analysis that the City currently reviewing and will evaluate prior to the formal application. Transportation/Access Development of this site will require several complicated transportation and right-of-way decisions that need to be guided by City Council. These are based on the direction provided by the City in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and will impact the park and trail discussion. County Road 10 is a collector street that the Comprehensive Plan anticipates being realigned to Meister Road to the north. The applicant is showing the existing County Road 10 roadbed being reclaimed for landscaping, except in areas needed to provide access to the existing properties south of County Road 10, including one single family home and the proposed Rockford varsity baseball Peachtree Partners, LLC PUD Sketch Plan (14-005) 2 March 18, 2014 field. This is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; however, the applicant would need to work closely with the City to determine the timing and extent of County Road 10 modifications. The Comprehensive Plan also shows a local street connection from the old County Road 10 to County Road 50. The plans show the road on the west side of the city park, but the applicant has shown it on the east side of the City Park. This is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and has less impact on the total park area loss than the original alignment proposed by the City and allows continued shared uses between the City and school properties. Parks, Trails and Sidewalks The applicant is showing a series of sidewalks and trails throughout the site. The Comprehensive Plan includes the 2030 Parks & Trails Plan shows an off-road trail on the north side of the site winding through the site and connecting to the existing city park. The concept plan is generally consistent with these trail locations. This natural resource corridor is shown as preserved with a trail corridor. The City’s Comprehensive Plan encourages preservation of this corridor but does not recommend the land be taken as public park. The trail easement would provide access to this area. However, the applicant has indicated that they would like the City to consider accepting this open space as public park and granting park dedication credit. Staff recommends that the land be preserved and owned/maintained by the Homeowners Association. • The Parks and Trails Commission should comment on whether or not the land area should be accepted as public park. Park dedication shall only be granted for trail easement areas as shown on the Comprehensive Plan and will not be given for trails located within public right-of-way. The developer is required to provide finished grading and ground cover for all park, playground, trail and public open spaces within their developments. No credit toward the required dedication shall be given for this work. Trails shall be paved by the developer as well as part of the PUD. • The trail locations are generally consistent with the locations shown on the Comprehensive Plan, but the Commission should review and comment. The Parks & Trails Plan also shows an on-road trail on County Road 10; however, if County Road is relocated as planned, this trail may not be required. The City will evaluate this trail as part of the transportation feasibility study. The sidewalk locations should be reevaluated to ensure a convenient pedestrian route and future extensions to the west, north and east along the planned road connections. • The Commission may wish to comment on areas where any additional trail/sidewalk connections should be provided or where locations should be adjusted. Under the current ordinance, park dedication for this concept is required at 11% of the net (pre- development) land area. In this case, the sketch plan shows approximately 90 net acres, which would require park dedication of 9.9 net acres. Credit would be given for dedication of public park and public trail easements shown on the Comprehensive Plan. Peachtree Partners, LLC PUD Sketch Plan (14-005) 3 March 18, 2014 The plan is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which shows a planned expansion of the existing city park site to the site through acquisition of land from this property. This area is shown on the Comprehensive Plan as an athletic park search area. The Comprehensive Plan showed 4 potential athletic park search areas and notes that the city would ideally choose one 120-acre site. • The City should consider whether this site is the preferred option for an athletic park. Since the Comprehensive Plan was originally adopted, the City has acquired 12 acres of the Roehlke property in western Corcoran for a new public works facility and has an option on an additional 126 acres from the Roehlke’s for an athletic park. The Roehlke property, like this site, is shown in one of the four athletic park search areas. The City will need to choose one site upon which to develop this complex. Staff finds that the Roehlke property, with its proximity to the new Public Works facility, may be more desirable for an athletic park. • The City should discuss whether or not the applicant’s plan, which seems to reduce the total park area due the new road alignment, is adequate for the city park land in this area. The City should evaluate whether or not some of the required park dedication should be provided in the form of land to expand this park. o As noted above, the loss of the park land is consistent with what was shown in the Transportation Plan. However, the Commission should discuss whether or not the amount of land remaining is adequate for this park or whether additional land should be dedicated to result in no net loss of park land (or expansion of the park). o The Commission may wish to discuss how this park might be redeveloped. The discussion should consider potential shared uses with the school, other athletic park area opportunities and park improvements on this site. o At the Planning Commission meeting last week, a commissioner asked whether or not the developer would be responsible for the cost of park improvement removal as a result of the road improvements required by the City. We have asked the City Attorney for an opinion and will provide an update at the March 18th meeting. The City should generally accept park dedication in the form of land where shown on the maps; however, if new information is available the city may choose to accept cash or a combination of cash and land. The City may accept cash-in-lieu of land at 11% of the value of the land with a maximum rate of $4,000 per unit for each new unit located inside of the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area). The City has a high level of discretion regarding park dedication on this site. Next Steps If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved, the applicant would proceed with the following next steps: a. Rezoning to PUD b. Preliminary Plat c. Preliminary PUD Development Plan d. Final Plat e. Final PUD Development Plan Peachtree Partners, LLC PUD Sketch Plan (14-005) 4 March 18, 2014 The ordinance requires the Parks and Trails Commission to review the Preliminary Plat and make a recommendation to the City Council. Summary The change to the land use designation will result in less park dedication being required on this site. However, if the density is shifted to another site, this dedication would be collected when those parcels develop. This is primarily a cash flow issue. The City must consider whether or not the City Park should be expanded as shown on both the Comprehensive Plan and the Design Guidelines adopted as part of the Zoning Ordinance or whether the possible acquisition of additional property near public works addresses the athletic park needs. The City should provide clear direction on this issue with the sketch plan. 4. Action The applicant is requesting comments on this PUD sketch plan. Any comments given by the City are advisory in nature and non-binding. The applicant will consider the comments from the City when they prepare their formal submittal for preliminary plat and PUD development plan approval. Attachments a. 2030 Parks and Trails Plan b. 2030 Roadway Functional Classification c. Applicant’s Comprehensive Plan narrative dated February 10, 2014 d. Applicant’s PUD Sketch Plan narrative and graphics dated February 12, 2014 Peachtree Partners, LLC PUD Sketch Plan (14-005) 5 March 18, 2014 ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STI E G R D WI L L O W D R I V E HACKAMORE ROAD TR A I L H A V E N R O A D CA I N R O A D OAKDALE DR STREHLER ROAD PI O N E E R T R COUNTY ROAD 117 RO L L L I N G H I L L S R D LARKIN RD (62ND AVE N) TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CI T Y O F G R E E N F I E L D CI T Y O F M A P L E G R O V E CITY OF MEDINA SCOTT LAKE BE C H T O L D R O A D $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUS H C R E E K OSP OSP OSP OSP T OSP OSP NP CP NP NP OSP NP NP NP OSP OSP OSP NP OSP ASA ASA ASA ASA T Parks & Trails Plan 4 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet 2030 Comprehensive Plan Figure 12 Existing Parks and Trails Proposed Parks and Trails Regional Trail Proposed County Bike Trail Existing On Road Trail Proposed On Road Trail City Hall/Memorial Park Community Park Existing Ball Fields/School Property Existing Park (Private/Lion's Park) Golf Course Open Water Wetlands Off Road Trail Off Road Trail outside 2030 Development Area Horseback Trail Proposed County Road 50 Natural Gas Pipeline Easement Trail (Potential) ASA - Athletic Search Area City Square OSP/Nature Park Neighborhood Park Trailhead Search Area Greenway Corridor (Bonus Eligible Resource Corridor) ASA OSP NP *Proposed park and trails locations represent the general search areas for parks and trails.The City will work with developers and landowners to identify the exact location and size of parks and trail alignments as development or park acquisition is proposed. City Limit 2030 MUSA Updated October 2013 Adopted June 2011 City ofCORCORAN 19 10 30 50 19 10 116 101 Trail La 81st Pl Patrick Pl Nystrom La Ma p l e L a Ch i s h o l m T r Li l y P o n d L a S h a n n o n L a Eb e r t R d Darrel La W C o r c o r a n T r Ga r d e n L a Su n d a n c e R d El m S t J e f f e r y L a 95th Ave Fo x V a l l e y D r Hillside Dr 101st Ave Jo n q u i l L a T r a i l L a Cain Pl Br a n d y w i n e R d Salem La Mystique Dr Gi n s e n g L a 81st Pl Abilene La Tessmer Rd Ro b e r t L a Larson Rd Fo x l i n e D r Mo h a w k D r Hu n t e r R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Rebecca Park Tr Ma p l e H i l l R d H a g e D r Horseshoe Tr Homestead Tr Woodland Tr B e l l e S t Larkin Rd Br o c k t o n P l Co u n t y H w y 1 0 1 Ka l k R d 93rd Ave N Meister Rd County Hwy 50 County Hwy 10 Pion e e r T r Ol d S e t t l e r s R d State Hwy 55 Stieg Rd Co u n t y H w y 1 9 97th Ave N Strehler Rd Be c h t o l d R d Oakdale Dr Ca i n R d Co u n t y R d 1 1 6 JUBERT LAKE COUNTY ROAD 117 (62ND AVE N) TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CI T Y O F G R E E N F I E L D CI T Y O F M A P L E G R O V E CITY OF MEDINA SCOTT LAKE $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUS H C R E E K Meadow Creek Dr Meadowview Dr He a t h e r L a Wi n d m i l l D r Rush Creek B l vd Rush Creek D r Sunset La 109th Ave N High B l u f f L a Ta m i a m i T r Oa k d a l e D r Hidden Ponds Dr Hig h l a n d Rid g e R d Sunny Hill La Stieg R d Hunters Ridge O s w a l dFarm Rd Du f f n e y D r Dassel La Rush Meadow La Jackie La Country Rd Country Cir E Schutte Rd Me i s t e r C t Schutte Farm Rd 75th Ave N Auger Ave Co m m e r c e S t Eagle R i d g e Rd E C o r c o r a n T r Bu c k s k i n T r Garrison Rd Tr a i l H a v e n R d Stre h l e r R d Julie Ann Dr Wi l l o w D r Wi n c h e s t e r T r Horse s h o e BendDr Jub e r t L a Wagon Wheel La Lakeview Cir 70th Ave N Bl u e b o n n e t D r B u t t e r w o r t h L a Gleason Rd Olde Sturbridge Rd Hackamore Rd 66th Ave N 63rd Ave N Proposed as Part ofNW Hennepin Study Proposed as Part ofNW Hennepin Study Proposed as Part ofNW Hennepin Study $+ 2030 RoadwayFunctional Classification 4 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet 2030 Comprehensive Plan Figure 16 2030 Roadway Functional Classification: Principal Arterial A Minor Reliever A Minor Expander Proposed A Minor Expander A Minor Connector Proposed A Minor Connector Major Collector Proposed Major Collector Minor Collector Proposed Minor Collector Local Street City Limit Open Water Updated October 2013 Adopted June 2011 City ofCORCORAN 50 19 10 19 30 116 101 10 50 1 Date: February 12, 2014 To: City of Corcoran From: Peachtree Partners, LLC Re: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sketch Plan Submittal Background: Attached is a PUD sketch plan submittal for the Schendel Property. Prior to preparing the sketch plan for this site, we studied the City’s planning and engineering documents and held several meetings with the City Staff, Rockford School District and the City Council. From the research and meetings we learned the following: 1. The City’s long term plan is to move County Road 10 to Meister Road (Comprehensive Plan – Transportation Plan). 2. Even if existing County Road 10 is not vacated, improving the safety of the existing intersection of County Road 10 and County Road 50 is a priority. 3. The City would like an internal street system within the Schendel site that provides a connection through the site that accommodates the vacation of County Road 10 (Southeast District Guidelines Plan). 4. The City identified a greenway corridor along the east side of the property and an extended greenway corridor along the north side of the property (Comprehensive Plan - Parks and Trails Plan). 5. Street connectivity – there is a desire for a potential street connection to CR 116 (Southeast District Guidelines Plan). 6. The City’s Park Plans identify several Athletic Search Areas (ASA) as options for locating a more significant park facility. One area is across from the Schendel property. We learned the City has not yet fully discussed where this will be located but the City does have an option on other property located in western Corcoran that could serve this purpose. 7. Based on our request the City is now considering changing the land use of the property from High Density Residential to Low Density Residential. Current market conditions (lack of demand for high density development) as well as the synergy between single family neighborhoods and elementary school are factors in that consideration. 2 Existing Site Attributes: Once we understood more about the City’s goals for the property, we evaluated how the site could be developed. First we identified the natural resources on the site, evaluated the general quality of those features, and prioritized what areas to protect and enhance while still providing a critical amount of development area to create a successful detached single family neighborhood. See Attachment - 5.  Drainage Patterns - The majority of the Schendel site drains to a large wetland near the east side of the property. We anticipate designing and constructing storm water ponds near this wetland. These ponds will meet water quality and quantity requirements of the City as well as the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission. In addition we anticipate altering the outlet from the wetland as necessary to restore the wetland and to maximize the efficient storage of storm water prior to discharging it from the site.  Woodlands - The woodland areas were evaluated. The large stand of trees along the eastern boundary was determined to be poor quality and the woods along the northern boundary was of moderate quality with some hardwoods.  Wetlands – A wetland delineation was conducted on the site and approved by the regulatory agencies. This delineation identified 11 wetlands totaling 10.73 acres on the property. Most of the wetlands are in poor condition and are being farmed and/or are dominated by invasive vegetation. Although of a low and medium quality, we identified two large wetlands along the east side of the property as good candidates for restoration. In talking with the watershed commission, there was significant interest in completing this restoration. Four of the wetlands, approximately 1.1 acres, are being impacted for development, at the same time the large wetland complex in the east, totaling almost 7 acres, is being restored and made into a significant amenity for the neighborhood. Overall of the 10.73 acres of wetlands, 9.63 acres are being protected and/or restored including the only high quality wetland on the site. In addition there will be a protective buffer around each wetland as required by the City and Watershed. Compliance with City Plans: After evaluating the physical characteristics of the site, we referenced the City’s overall plans to see which elements could be incorporated into the sketch plan.  Parks & Trails Plan – The City identified a greenway corridor along the east side of the property which links to an extended greenway corridor along the north side of the property. Our sketch plan weaves these corridors into the neighborhood and provides trails that link the neighborhood to the greenways, the restored wetland complex to the east, preserved woods to the north, and the City/School properties to the southwest. 3 The guidelines in the zoning ordinance also contemplates the potential for a larger park complex in this area. However, between the existing School and City properties there is a significant amount of potential for recreation area shared between the City and School. Additionally, it is our understanding that the City may be considering other areas for a regional park facility. As a result, the focus of our design is on the trails, greenway corridors and preservation of other natural resources, which will supplement the School/City properties.  Transportation Plan – As previously mentioned we understand that the rerouting of County Road 10 is a City goal. Our sketch plan is consistent with this goal and therefore shows County Road 10 being vacated. The sketch plan also provides internal street connections as well as a connection to CR 116 which, was also indicated on the Southeast District Guide Plan, while at the same time providing an opportunity for improving the safety of the County Road 10 and County Road 50 intersection as contemplated in both the zoning and transportation plans. Figure 1 – 2030 Parks and Trails Plan Figure 2 - Southeast District Guide Plan Figure 1 - 2030 Transportation Plan 4 Features of the Sketch Plan After studying the City’s plans and the natural features of the site we used our own experience in creating attractive and livable neighborhoods to design the layout shown in the sketch plan. The sketch plan contains the following key features: 1. Sense of Entry – It is important for us to create a special sense of entry into our neighborhoods. This is accomplished with the use of entry monumentation, landscaping, view corridors, and use of open space vs. placing homes at the entry to the neighborhood. 2. Trails – Trails have long been one of the most desired amenities within any neighborhood. We have created a meaningful trail and sidewalk system that links the Schendel neighborhood to the natural amenities in and around the property as well as to the Park and School properties to the west. Connecting these features creates a high value trail system for the public. 3. Curvilinear Design – Long rows of straight streets is generally not what consumers like when they experience a neighborhood. They prefer a more undulating streetscape with varying views. You’ll note that our sketch plan incorporates curvilinear streets to add beauty and interest. This also calms traffic which creates safer streets. 4. Cul-de-sacs - In some cities the public works department frowns on cul-de-sacs because they take a little longer to plow, although we have not found this to be a universal response. On the other hand most homebuyers value cul-de-sacs because there is less traffic, safer for children and quieter. Plain and simple cul-de-sacs add value and are desired by many customers. Including them within neighborhoods adds value for the City, the developer and the neighborhood. 5. View Corridors – When possible, we like to integrate views of natural features as one drives through the neighborhood. One way this is accomplished is by removing home sites (lots) to allow openings for these views. Another technique is to design streets so they come close to these amenities. The sketch plan incorporates view corridors from the entry as well as in two locations along the large restored wetland. 6. Buffers - We strategically increased the depth of lots where either a ball field currently exists or where a future ball field may be constructed. In addition, we provided additional landscaping in these areas as a buffer between the homes and the ball fields. When reviewing the sketch plan you will see how we incorporated the key attributes listed above as well as the City’s goals. Below we describe in more detail a few of the specific features of the site and other considerations of the design. Entrance off County Road 50 and City Park at Entrance – As mentioned previously, it is very important to have a sense of arrival into a neighborhood. After studying the alternatives for a safe entrance from CR 50, there appears to be only once reasonable alternative. This is the entrance as shown that runs through the existing City Park and Ball field. 5 We understand that this may have a short term impact on the Park but we also believe that we can work together in creating additional park improvements that could ultimately increase the functionality and usability of this City Park. This entrance was designed as a permanent fix of the County Road 10 and County Road 50 intersection but, with some modification, could also be used as an interim solution to the County Road 10/50 intersection until the County Road 10 vacation occurs.  Exception Parcel – A ghost plat is shown for the exception parcel in the northwest portion of the site.  School Property - We have met with the school on several occasions to discuss the interplay of the sites, evaluate options for accessing the school, and to look for ways to maximize connections between the sites. While this process is ongoing, it appears that their proposed location for a Varsity ball field can be accommodated. We developed a number of feasible options to maximize the connectivity and efficiency of City/School site. Some included not treating the City/School property line as a barrier.  Access to exception parcels – We show how the two exception parcels on County Road 10 can be provided access if they are not acquired by the City or others.  Access to Park - We show the main access to the City park from County Road 50. Our analysis of various future configurations of the City/School site indicates that these properties will be best served by access from County Road 50.  Access to proposed Ballfield – If the Rockford School District constructs a varsity ball field on the northern portion of the Rockford School District property as planned, the impact of the ball field on the Schendel sketch plan is manageable. We have designed some buffer space and landscaping as a screen between the nearest homes and the ball field. In addition, we think it would be prudent for the City to consider reasonable limitations on hours of operation, lighting, use of loud speakers, etc. when giving approval. If CR 10 is vacated and the ball field is located in the north, a revision to the parking lot entrance for the ball field may need to be contemplated. Ultimately, we believe that use of the school property is best served with all access coming off of CR 50. Specific Requested PUD Provisions While our PUD Sketch Plan likely has more detail and precision than typical sketch plans, it is important to remember this is only a sketch plan. After hearing the feedback from the City and prior to preparing a preliminary plat we will once again refine this plan and layout. Among other things the exact lotting patterns, the size of the lots, types of lots, and overall number of lots will likely change as we prepare a preliminary plat. 6 Below are some of the specific PUD standards we have contemplated. As we move forward with preliminary plans these will be refined and additional standards or exceptions may be added.  Minimum Lot Area- 5,500 square feet  Front Yard Set-Back - 25’  Rear Yard Set-Back – 25’  Side Yard Set-Back Minimum – 5’  Minimum Width at Front Set-Back – 55’  Minimum Lot Depth – 100’  Encroachment in Front Yard Set-Back for Porch – 8’  Encroachment in Side Yard Set-Back on corner lot for Porch – 8’  Driveways may be allowed to encroach into side yards with Architectural Control Committee approval  Shared driveways may be allowed  Decks allowed in the rear yard set-backs, but not closer than 15’ and not in drainage and utility easements  28 foot wide streets within 50 feet of right-of-way  No structural setbacks or landscape buffers along County Road 10 (Due to County Road 10 being vacated in the future)  50% impervious in Shoreland Overlay District  55’ lots widths in Shoreland Overlay District  Maximum Principal Building Height 35’ in Shoreland Overlay District Compatibility with Surrounding Areas  To the west - We have been working collaboratively with the City of Corcoran and Rockford Independent School District (ISD) 833 to plan for the elimination and vacation of existing County Road 10 immediately adjacent to the site and for its realignment to another location as conceptually shown in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Vacation of this road creates opportunities for synergies between the Schendel neighborhood and the Corcoran City Park, as well as a potential elementary school currently envisioned for the school site. Removing the barrier of County Road 10 will enable safe and convenient access for the families living in the Schendel neighborhood to use the park, open space, and to gain access to the future school. These various land uses – single family homes, parks, open space, and an elementary school – are not only highly compatible, but to a large degree these land uses depend and thrive on each other. In accordance with this compatibility, we have provided multiple trail connections from the Schendel site to the park/school. The City’s Land Use Plan guides these properties for Parks and Open Space. It should be noted that one single family property lies within the park/school property. This use is compatible with the uses planned for Schendel. 7  To the north – Rush Creek runs through properties directly to the north of the Schendel site. Much of the area between Schendel and Rush Creek consists of wetlands and flood plain and is therefore undevelopable. Due to the unbuildable nature of these areas, much of it has remained wooded and therefore has been identified on the City’s Comprehensive Plan as potential greenway corridor. A small amount of land to the northwest of the site contains upland areas which may be developable. The Land Use Plan identifies these properties as Mixed Residential, which is compatible with the uses planned for Schendel. A moderate amount of land to the northeast of Schendel also contains upland areas which may be developable. The Land Use Plan guides these properties as Mixed and High Density Residential, which is compatible with the uses planned for Schendel, particularly since there will be an open space buffer between a majority of the property to the north and the Schendel site.  To the east – A number of existing, large lot single family properties lie to the east of Schendel. The Land Use Plan guides these properties as Medium Density Residential. This use is compatible with the uses planned for Schendel.  To the southeast – A church owns property which is located along the southeast corner of the Schendel property. The actual church and associated parking lot lie further to the southeast. We do not know what the church plans to do with the portion of their land located immediately adjacent to Schendel. Historically, churches are integral components of residential neighborhoods and are considered compatible uses.  To the south – A few commercial properties currently exist along County Road 10 near the intersection with County Road 50. They consist of vacant lots, a deteriorating building, another building utilized for storage, and a bar. The Land Use Plan guides these properties as Commercial. This is a relatively small area that exists prior to development. Adjacent buyers will be aware of the uses and zoning that exists in this location. Other Considerations  Access to Sewer and Water Services Sanitary Sewer – In 2012 the City extended trunk sanitary sewer from the Maple Grove boundary to County Road 116, a short distance north of County Road 10. This places the sewer close to the Schendel site. We will work with the City Engineer to determine the best route to bring sewer from the Schendel site to the existing trunk sewer. We anticipate installing a lift (pumping) station near the north property line of Schendel, just north of the large wetland on the east side of the property. This is the lowest point on the Schendel site. From there, we anticipate pumping wastewater to the existing trunk sewer along County Road 116. Sanitary sewer will be extended from the lift station through the Schendel site to the City park property on the southwest side of existing County Road 10. It is our understanding that this will enable a potential elementary school and the downtown businesses to be served with sanitary sewer. 8 Water Main - In 2012 the City extended trunk water main from the Maple Grove boundary to County Road 116, a short distance north of County Road 10. This places the water system close to the Schendel site. We will work with the City Engineer to determine the best route to bring water from the Schendel site to the existing trunk water main. Water main will be extended through the Schendel site to the City park property on the southwest side of existing County Road 10. It is our understanding that this will enable a potential elementary school and the downtown businesses to be served with potable water.  Density & Area Facts - Area and density calculations are shown on the sketch plan.  Park Dedication – We have incorporated the City’s plans for greenway corridors through the Schendel property and plan to construct trails to link these corridors with each other. These corridors are the critical first sections of a City-wide system along natural resources flowing through the community. We anticipate that a portion of our park dedication will be satisfied through dedication of these corridors and construction of the associated trails. Any additional park dedication obligations are anticipated to be satisfied by payment of park dedication fees. As mentioned above we believe we should collaborate with the City to create a more robust City Park along CR 50 at the intersection of CR 10 and CR 50.  Representative Style of Structure – Since we do not yet have a specific builder or builders in mind for this development we attached a representative sample of structures from a variety of builders that generally look like the homes we expect to be built within this neighborhood.  Declarations - This neighborhood will have a Homeowner’s Association that will maintain common elements within the neighborhood. The Association will also enforce any other provisions of the declarations such as architectural controls and use of the common property. Attachments The following exhibits accompany this narrative:  Attachment - 1 - Location Map – Seven County Metro  Attachment - 2 - Location Map – City Location  Attachment - 3 - Half Section Plat Map  Attachment - 4 - Site Aerial Photo - Aerial photo of Schendel site and the surrounding property  Attachment - 5 - Existing Natural Resources - Map of the natural features, topography, and wetlands  Attachment - 6 - Planned Unit Development (PUD Sketch Plan)  Attachment - 7 - Representative Examples of Possible Home Styles We look forward to discussing our plans for the Schendel property with you. Lino Lakes Hugo Eagan Afton Grant Lakeville Andover East Bethel Orono Corcoran Plymouth Medina Ramsey Ham Lake Woodbury St. Paul Oak Grove Bloomington Rosemount Forest Lake Minnetrista Eden Prairie Shakopee Edina Burnsville Maple Grove May Township Cottage Grove Independence Minnetonka Columbus Lake Elmo Nowthen St. Francis Savage Greenfield Eureka Township Benton Township Helena Township Linwood Township Empire Township Douglas Township Camden Township Brooklyn Park Chaska Dahlgren Township Hampton Township Marshan Township Coon Rapids Belle Plaine Township Hollywood Township Vermillion Township Watertown Township Waconia Township Scandia Cedar Lake Township New Market Township Fridley Castle Rock Township Maplewood Denmark Township Prior Lake Laketown Township Roseville Inver Grove Heights Sand Creek Township Hassan Township Blakeley Township Blaine Spring Lake Township Greenvale Township Young America Township Apple Valley Oakdale Shoreview Ravenna Township Victoria Anoka Farmington Credit River Township San Francisco TownshipHancock Township Champlin Dayton Stillwater Township Sciota Township Nininger Township Arden Hills Crystal Richfield Stillwater St. Louis Park Golden Valley North Oaks Chanhassen Louisville Township Mound Waterford Township Shorewood Rogers St. Lawrence Township Mendota Heights Randolph Township Carver Wayzata MahtomediNew BrightonBrooklyn Center Baytown Township West Lakeland Township Vadnais Heights Hopkins New Hope Newport White Bear Township South St. Paul Jackson Township Jordan West St. Paul Belle Plaine Deephaven Little Canada Waconia Lakeland Elko DellwoodMounds View Fort Snelling White Bear Lake Robbinsdale Centerville Bayport Marine on St. Croix North St. Paul Columbia Heights Miesville Tonka Bay Coates Oak Park Heights St. Paul Park Circle Pines Bethel Falcon Heights Hampton Grey Cloud Island Township Sunfish Lake Lilydale Watertown Woodland Osseo Gem Lake Randolph Vermillion Excelsior Maple Plain Long Lake Cologne Greenwood Minnetonka Beach St. Bonifacius Hanover Pine Springs Lexington Norwood Young America New Prague Spring Lake Park Spring Park New Market Lake St. Croix Beach Mayer Lakeland Shores Lauderdale Loretto Mendota New Germany Medicine Lake St. Marys Point St. Anthony Hilltop Hamburg New Trier Willernie Hastings Landfall Rockford Minneapolis Subject Property ¨§¦35 ¨§¦35 ¨§¦35E ¨§¦35W ¨§¦35W ¨§¦35E ¨§¦94 ¨§¦94 ¨§¦394 ¨§¦694 ¨§¦694 ¨§¦494 ¨§¦494 ¨§¦94 ¨§¦94 Lino Lakes Hugo Eagan Afton Grant Lakeville Andover East Bethel Orono Corcoran Plymouth Medina Ramsey Ham Lake Woodbury St. Paul Oak Grove Bloomington Rosemount Forest Lake Minnetrista Eden Prairie Shakopee Edina Burnsville Maple Grove May Township Cottage Grove Independence Minnetonka Columbus Lake Elmo Nowthen St. Francis Savage Greenfield Eureka Township Benton Township Helena Township Linwood Township Empire Township Douglas Township Camden Township Brooklyn Park Chaska Dahlgren Township Hampton Township Marshan Township Coon Rapids Belle Plaine Township Hollywood Township Vermillion Township Watertown Township Waconia Township Scandia Cedar Lake Township New Market Township Fridley Castle Rock Township Maplewood Denmark Township Prior Lake Laketown Township Roseville Inver Grove Heights Sand Creek Township Hassan Township Blakeley Township Blaine Spring Lake Township Greenvale Township Young America Township Apple Valley Oakdale Shoreview Ravenna Township Victoria Anoka Farmington Credit River Township San Francisco TownshipHancock Township Champlin Dayton Stillwater Township Sciota Township Nininger Township Arden Hills Crystal Richfield Stillwater St. Louis Park Golden Valley North Oaks Chanhassen Louisville Township Mound Waterford Township Shorewood Rogers St. Lawrence Township Mendota Heights Randolph Township Carver Wayzata MahtomediNew BrightonBrooklyn Center Baytown Township West Lakeland Township Vadnais Heights Hopkins New Hope Newport White Bear Township South St. Paul Jackson Township Jordan West St. Paul Belle Plaine Deephaven Little Canada Waconia Lakeland Elko DellwoodMounds View Fort Snelling White Bear Lake Robbinsdale Centerville Bayport Marine on St. Croix North St. Paul Columbia Heights Miesville Tonka Bay Coates Oak Park Heights St. Paul Park Circle Pines Bethel Falcon Heights Hampton Grey Cloud Island Township Sunfish Lake Lilydale Watertown Woodland Osseo Gem Lake Randolph Vermillion Excelsior Maple Plain Long Lake Cologne Greenwood Minnetonka Beach St. Bonifacius Hanover Pine Springs Lexington Norwood Young America New Prague Spring Lake Park Spring Park New Market Lake St. Croix Beach Mayer Lakeland Shores Lauderdale Loretto Mendota New Germany Medicine Lake St. Marys Point St. Anthony Hilltop Hamburg New Trier Willernie Hastings Landfall Rockford Minneapolis Subject Property ¨§¦35 ¨§¦35 ¨§¦35E ¨§¦35W ¨§¦35W ¨§¦35E ¨§¦94 ¨§¦94 ¨§¦394 ¨§¦694 ¨§¦694 ¨§¦494 ¨§¦494 ¨§¦94 ¨§¦94 ANOKA WASHINGTON HENNEPIN RAMSEY CARVER SCOTT DAKOTA ´8 0 84 Miles Location Map - Twin Cities Seven County Area Corcoran, Minnesota February 7, 2014 V:\1938\active\193802580\GIS\Projects\Metro Location.mxd Map 1 ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STIE G R D WI L L O W D R I V E HACKAMORE ROAD TR A I L H A V E N R O A D CA I N R O A D OAKDALE DR STREHLER ROAD PIO N E E R T R COUNTY ROAD 117 RO L L L I N G H I L L S R D LARKIN RD (62ND AVE N) TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CI T Y O F G R E E N F I E L D CI T Y O F M A P L E G R O V E CITY OF MEDINA SCOTT LAKE BE C H T O L D R O A D EiGH EsGH E¢GH IïKL IöKL EiGH E¼GH EsGH MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUS H C R E E K - 02.07.2014 - 0 3,500 7,000Feet Project Site City Limit Open Water Wetlands NSchendel -City Location V:\1938\active\193802580\GIS\Projects\City Location.mxd Map 2 RUS H C R E E K Project Site - 02.07.2014 - 0 500 1,000Feet NSchendel -Half Section Plat Map V:\1938\active\193802580\GIS\Projects\Half Section Location.mxd Map 3 Rebecca Park Trail Co Rd 50 CS A H 1 0 Fl e t c h e r L a n e C o R d 1 1 6 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community - 02.07.2014 - 0 500 1,000Feet Project Site NSchendel -Site Aerial Photo V:\1938\active\193802580\GIS\Projects\Site Aerial.mxd Low Quality Wetland to be Restored Low Quality Woods High Quality WetlandMedium Quality Maple Basswood Flood Plain Flood Plain Low Quality Wetland Low Quality WetlandLow Quality Woods DNR Regulated Tributary to Rush Creek Low Quality Woods Low or Medium Quality Wetland Low or Medium Quality Wetland Low Quality Wetlands Existing Farm Field Low Quality Woods Shoreland Overlay District Medium Quality Wetland Medium Quality Wetland to be Restored Project #_193802580 N - 02.12.2014 - Schendel - Existing Natural Resources 0 200 500 Rebecca Park Trail (CR 50) Residential Lot Flood Plain Wetland Open Space Sidewalk Trail Future Trail Zoning & Lot Information Current Zoning - RMF-3 High Density Residential Proposed Zoning - PUD Planned Unit Development Proposed Minimum Lot Width = 65’ Proposed Minimum Lot Depth – 120’ Proposed Setbacks Front = 25’ Side = 5’ and 10’ Rear = 30’ Proposed Right-of-way = 50’ Gross Density Property Area = 103.3 acres Proposed Number of Lots = 231 Gross Density = 2.24 units/acre Net Density Property Area = 103.3 acres Wetlands Not Impacted by Development = 9.6 ac Wetland Buffer Not Impacted by Development = 2.6 ac Flood Plain without Wetlands and Buffer = 1.7 ac Ponds In Open Space = 2.2 ac Right-of-way = 15.6 ac 20’ Wide Trail Easement = 2.5 ac Net Developable Acreage = 69.1 ac Net Density = 3.34 units/acre Fl e t c h e r L a n e ( C R 1 1 6 ) Entrance Monument City Park HOA Outlot Restored Wetland Overlook New driveway access to existing home Future trail connections Trail Schendel - PUD Sketch Plan Project #_193802580 N - 02.12.2014 - 0 200 500 02.11.2014 Schendel— Representative Examples of Possible Home Styles 8b. CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 – Office 763.420.6056 – Fax E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us MEMO Meeting Date: March 18, 2014 To: Parks and Trails Commission From: Brad Martens, City Administrator Re: Sports Fundraiser Opportunity ______________________________________________________________________________ A fundraising group has approached the City of Corcoran with an opportunity to assist in raising funds through advertising on bat rack holders at the City Park. Information on the opportunity is attached to this memorandum. Staff is concerned with language in the proposed agreement giving exclusive rights for advertisement. The Park and Trails Commission should discuss which terms would be acceptable for a fundraising opportunity. Attachment: 1. Sports Fundraiser Proposal 2. Sports Fundraiser Advertising Agreement Sports Fundraiser Giving back to Maple Grove CONTACT US: info@minnesotasportsfundraiser.com www.minnesotasportsfundraiser.com Mission Statement 2 Establishing Brand Awareness for local businesses while giving back to the community where it matters. What is Sports Fundraiser? •An opportunity for local businesses to advertise to families and friends during sporting events in order to raise money for the athletic organization. Sports Fundraiser serves 3 purposes: 1)Complimentary Bat holder 2)Creative Advertising Opportunity 3)Raise Money for Athletic Organization 3 Our Process Minnesota Sports Fundraiser reaches out to business in the local community with a unique marketing opportunity that gives back where it matters. 1.Meet with local Parks and Recreation or Baseball Associations with opportunity to receive free bat racks and additional donations. 2. Meet with local business in the surrounding area to seek sponsorship opportunities. 3.Generate and maintain bat racks with local sponsors advertised on the baseball fields. 4.Send donations to Park and Recreation or Baseball Association at the end of each year. 4 Base Fall Fields Minnesota Sports Fundraiser is requesting permission to implement the following on fields that are agreed upon. 1.We would like to donate 2 baseball racks per field that contain advertisement that has approval. 2.2 additional sign's that contain local advertisement will be hung in on the back side of the bat rack or in approved locations. 3.Equipment will be maintained by Minnesota Sports Fundraiser and taken down seasons end. 4.Advertisements containing alcohol, tobacco, or any other inappropriate pictures is under the discretion of the baseball diamond organization. 5 6 Bat Rack Locations on the Baseball Diamond Advertisement and Signs •Baseball rack will contain up to 5 sponsors total. •The bat rack is 1ft by 3ft long •The bat rack is made of steel and is able to hold 8 bats and 2 game balls. •Advertisement is a vinyl and is placed on a back board which is made of •Sign will contain up to 5 sponsors total •The sign is 2ft by 3ft long 7 Donations How much is Minnesota Sports Fundraiser giving back to the local baseball fields? Sports Fundraiser will donate up to $1000 per field that we are allowed to advertise on depending on sponsorship fulfillment. Things that may affect sponsorship fulfillment and rates: •Time of year the sponsor begins advertising •Discounted sponsorship rates 8 Sponsors We are looking to reach out to local businesses in the general location that would like to create brand awareness and establish a good reputation in there community. Benefits for Sponsors 1.Name Branding 2.Giving Back Where It Matters 3.Capturing a Captive Audience 9 Vision Minnesota Sports Fundraise would like to give this opportunity to sporting facilities and communities through out the nation by continuing to donate back to where it matters allowing us to grow and expand to other states. 10 11 8c. Corcoran Athletics Association 03/10/2014 To: Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission RE: Scoreboard Proposal From: Corcoran Athletics Association The CAA would like to invite the Parks and Trial Commissioners and the City of Corcoran to consider this matching fund proposal. The CAA would like to add to the experience the young players have while playing ball in Corcoran. In the past we upgraded the uniforms, purchased better equipment, and helped the city improve and maintain the fields. The CAA would like to propose the addition of a remote controlled, electronic scoreboard to one of Corcoran’s baseball fields At this time the funds raised are: CAA $3500.00, Corcoran Lions $1200.00 and $100.00 from a private party for a total of $4800.00. The Association will be presenting this donation request to the NW Area Jaycee’s on March 27th We have attached two samples of what the scoreboard may look like. I am still looking for reports and reviews of scoreboard manufacturers. Also am looking for maintenance contracts that may be offered. Kevin Dale CAA Manager. WWW.DAKTRONICS.COM E-MAIL: SALES@DAKTRONICS.COM 201 Daktronics Drive, PO Box 5128, Brookings, SD 57006 Phone: 1-800-325-8766 or 605-692-0200 Fax: 605-697-4746 DD2118191 051013 Page 1 of 6 This outdoor LED baseball/softball scoreboard displays HOME and GUEST team scores for up to seven innings, total RUNS to 99, BALL to three, STRIKE to two and OUT to two. Scoreboard shown with optional striping and amber PanaView® digits. DIMENSIONS UNCRATED WEIGHT POWER (120 VAC) 6'-6" H x 16'-0" W x 8" D (1.98 m, 4.87 m, 203 mm)525 lb (238 kg) 600 Watts, 5 Amps Note: Models with 240 VAC power at half the indicated amperage are also offered (International Use Only). DISPLAY COLOR Choose from 150+ colors (from Martin Senour® paint book) at no additional cost. CONSTRUCTION Alcoa aluminum alloy 5052 for excellent corrosion resistance PRODUCT SAFETY APPROVAL ETL listed to UL Standards 48 and 1433; tested to CSA standards and CE labeled for outdoor use OPERATING TEMPERATURES • Display: -22 to 122° Fahrenheit (-30 to 50° Celsius) • Console: 32 to 130° Fahrenheit (0 to 54° Celsius) DIGITS • All digits are 15" (381 mm) high. • Select all red or all amber LED digits. Scoreboard may instead have mixed LED digit colors (see DD1965467). • Scoreboard features robust weather-sealed digits (see DD2495646). • Digits may be dimmed for night viewing. CAPTIONS • HOME and GUEST captions are 10" (254 mm) high. BALL, STRIKE and OUT captions are 9" (229 mm) high. All other captions are 8" (203 mm) high. • Standard captions are vinyl, applied directly to the display face. DAKTRONICS BA-2022 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS BALLSTRIKEOUT 1234567RUNS GUEST HOME DAKTRONICS WWW.DAKTRONICS.COM E-MAIL: SALES@DAKTRONICS.COM All Sport® and PanaView® are trademarks of Daktronics, Inc. Martin Senour® is a registered trademark of its owner. DD2118191 051013 Page 2 of 6 Copyright © 2013 Daktronics, Inc. CONTROL CONSOLE CONTROL OPTIONS All Sport® 5000 (see SL-03991) Wired (standard): One-pair shielded cable of 22 AWG minimum is required. A cover plate with mounted connector and standard 2" x 4" x 2" (51 mm x 102 mm x 51 mm) outlet box is provided. Connector mates with signal cable from control console. Wireless (optional): 2.4 GHz spread spectrum radio features 64 non-interfering channels and 8 broadcast groups (see SL-04370). DAKTRONICS BA-2022 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS MOUNTING Scoreboard is typically mounted on two vertical beams or poles. Hardware to mount scoreboard on two beams is included; hardware for more beams is at additional cost. Standard mounting uses I-beam clamps. Optional mounting method using angle brackets is also offered; maximum beam width is 12" (305 mm) and maximum beam depth is 22" (559 mm). Refer to attached drawings for more information on mounting methods. SERVICE ACCESS Digit panels and electronics are serviced from the front of the scoreboard. GENERAL INFORMATION Scoreboard provides scoring capabilities for two teams. 100% solid state electronics are housed in an all aluminum cabinet. Scoreboard is shipped in one section. Specifications and pricing are subject to change without notice. OPTIONS & ACCESSORIES • Scoreboard border striping • Multiple caption and striping colors (see DD2101644) • Team name caption in place of HOME • Team names on changeable panels • Individual digit protective screens (see SL-04939) • Protective netting • Optional angle bracket mounting method • Advertising/identification panels • Decorative accents • Electronic message centers and video displays in multiple sizes ADVERTISING/IDENTIFICATION PANELS Backlit & Non-Backlit: 1'-6" H x 16'-0" W (457 mm, 4.87 m) 2'-0" H x 16'-0" W (610 mm, 4.87 m) 2'-6" H x 16'-0" W (762 mm, 4.87 m) 3'-0" H x 16'-0" W (914 mm, 4.87 m) For additional non-backlit panel sizes, see SL-03761. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • Installation Specifications: DWG-298975 (attached) • Standard I-beam Mounting: DWG-1052565 (attached) • Optional Pole Mounting: DWG-1048184 (attached) • Component Locations: DWG-1066358 (attached) • Architectural Specifications: See SL-08405 • Installation Manual: See DD2118213 • Service Manual: See DD2124597 01 0 4 F E B 1 3 KD D PE R E C - 9 2 6 2 , R E P L A C E D " T O T A L " W I T H " R U N S " C A P T I O N WWW.DAKTRONICS.COM E-MAIL: SALES@DAKTRONICS.COM 201 Daktronics Drive, PO Box 5128, Brookings, SD 57006 Phone: 1-800-325-8766 or 605-692-0200 Fax: 605-697-4746 DD2594524 121813 Page 1 of 6 TIME PITCH COUNT AT BAT PITCH COUNT DAKTRONICS BALLSTRIKEOUT 12345678910RUNSHITSERRGUEST HOME AT BAT H/E This outdoor LED baseball/softball scoreboard displays HOME and GUEST team scores for up to 10 innings, total RUNS and HITS to 99 and ERR (errors) to nine for each team, AT BAT to 99, BALL to three, STRIKE to two, OUT to two and H/E (hit or error) with field position number for the error. Scoreboard can show TIME or PITCH COUNT instead of AT BAT, as well as AT BAT or PITCH COUNT in place of H/E. Scoreboard shown with optional striping and amber PanaView® digits. DIMENSIONS # OF SECTIONS UNCRATED WEIGHT POWER (120 VAC) 7'-0" H x 25'-0" W x 8" D (2.13 m, 7.62 m, 203 mm)Two Total 875 lb (397 kg) 900 Watts, 7.5 Amps 3'-0" H x 25'-0" W x 8" D (914 mm, 7.62 m, 203 mm)One Top 375 lb (170 kg) 4'-0" H x 25'-0" W x 8" D (1.22 m, 7.62 m, 203 mm)One Bottom 500 lb (227 kg) Notes: 1) Models with 240 VAC power at half the indicated amperage are also offered (International Use Only). 2) Optional TNMCs add 300 Watts to scoreboard power and 80 lb (36 kg) to weight of bottom scoreboard section. Optional Team Name Message Centers (TNMCs) DAKTRONICS BA-2125 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS DIGITS • AT BAT, BALL, STRIKE, OUT and H/E digits are 18" (457 mm) high. All other digits are 15" (381 mm) high. • Select all red or all amber LED digits. Scoreboard may instead have mixed LED digit colors (see DD1965467). • Scoreboard features robust weather-sealed digits (see DD2495646). • Digits may be dimmed for night viewing. CAPTIONS • HOME and GUEST captions are 12" (305 mm) high. AT BAT, BALL, STRIKE, OUT and H/E captions are 10" (254 mm) high. All other captions are 8" (203 mm) high. • Standard captions are vinyl, applied directly to the display face. • Optional TNMCs are 10.6" (269 mm) high. DISPLAY COLOR Choose from 150+ colors (from Martin Senour® paint book) at no additional cost. CONSTRUCTION Alcoa aluminum alloy 5052 for excellent corrosion resistance PRODUCT SAFETY APPROVAL ETL listed to UL Standards 48 and 1433; tested to CSA standards and CE labeled for outdoor use OPERATING TEMPERATURES • Display: -22 to 122° Fahrenheit (-30 to 50° Celsius) • Console: 32 to 130° Fahrenheit (0 to 54° Celsius) HAWKS DOWN DOWNHOME DOWNHOME DOWN HAWKS HOME HAWKS TIGERS SHOTS SHOTS PLAYER PLAYER Choose one of three vinyl captions for upper scoreboard corners (Optional changeable caption panels also offered) WWW.DAKTRONICS.COM E-MAIL: SALES@DAKTRONICS.COM 201 Daktronics Drive, PO Box 5128, Brookings, SD 57006 Phone: 1-800-325-8766 or 605-692-0200 Fax: 605-697-4746 DD2594524 121813 Page 2 of 6 CONTROL CONSOLE CONTROL OPTIONS All Sport® 5000 (see SL-03991) Wired (standard): One-pair shielded cable of 22 AWG minimum is required. A cover plate with mounted connector and standard 2" x 4" x 2" (51 mm x 102 mm x 51 mm) outlet box is provided. Connector mates with signal cable from control console. Wireless (optional): 2.4 GHz spread spectrum radio features 64 non-interfering channels and 8 broadcast groups (see SL-04370). DAKTRONICS BA-2125 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS TIME CLOCK The two-digit clock can display hours/minutes/seconds. Clock information shifts from hours to minutes to seconds as time counts down. MOUNTING Scoreboard is typically mounted on two or three vertical beams that require specific spacing. Hardware to mount scoreboard on two beams is included; hardware for more beams is at additional cost. Standard mounting uses I-beam clamps. Optional mounting method using angle brackets is also offered; maximum beam width is 12" (305 mm) and maximum beam depth is 22" (559 mm). Refer to attached drawings for more information on mounting methods. For mounting to horizontal beams, contact your Daktronics representative for more information. SERVICE ACCESS Digit panels and electronics are serviced from either the front or rear of the scoreboard. GENERAL INFORMATION Scoreboard provides scoring capabilities for two teams. 100% solid state electronics are housed in an all aluminum cabinet. Scoreboard is shipped in two sections. Specifications and pricing are subject to change without notice. OPTIONS & ACCESSORIES • Scoreboard border striping • Striping around BALL, STRIKE and OUT digits • TIME, AT BAT or PITCH COUNT captions on changeable panels • Multiple caption and striping colors (see DD2101644) • Team name caption in place of HOME * • Team names on changeable panels * • Programmable Team Name Message Centers (see DD1696958) • Individual digit protective screens (see SL-04939) • Protective netting • Optional angle bracket mounting method • Advertising/identification panels • Decorative accents • Electronic message centers and video displays in multiple sizes * Only for scoreboard without Team Name Message Centers ADVERTISING/IDENTIFICATION PANELS Backlit & Non-Backlit: 1'-6" H x 25'-0" W (457 mm, 7.62 m) 2'-0" H x 25'-0" W (610 mm, 7.62 m) 2'-6" H x 25'-0" W (762 mm, 7.62 m) 3'-0" H x 25'-0" W (914 mm, 7.62 m) 4'-0" H x 25'-0" W (1.22 m, 7.62 m) For additional non-backlit panel sizes, see SL-03761. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • Installation Specifications: DWG-316750 (attached) • Standard I-beam Mounting: DWG-1052565 (attached) • Optional Pole Mounting: DWG-1048184 (attached) • Component Locations: DWG-1151033 (attached) • Architectural Specifications: See DD2587726 • Installation Manual: See DD1969938 • Service Manual: See DD2124597 DAKTRONICS, INC.THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCE BY ANY MEANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF DAKTRONICS, INC. COPYRIGHT 2011 DAKTRONICS, INC. BROOKINGS, SD 57006 DO NOT SCALE DRAWING PROJ:OUTDOOR SCOREBOARD TITLE:P1647; I-BEAM CLAMP MOUNTING DESIGN:MCARSRU DRAWN:MCARSRU DATE:23-OCT-13 SCALE:1/8 SHEET:REV JOB NO: FUNC-TYPE-SIZE 10525651 OF 103P1647E -07 -AREVDATE:BY: 0121 FEB 12 CHANGED ROCKER TO I-BEAM KDD 0207 MAR 12 ADDED STADNARD MOUNTING METHOD NOTES KDD 0323 OCT 13 CHANGED BOLT TORQUE FROM 30 FT-LB TO 40 FT-LB PER EC-12382 NJM MOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS: 1. PLACE SPRING NUTS INTO SCOREBOARD CHANNEL IN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF VERTICAL BEAMS 2. LIFT SCOREBOARD INTO POSITION 3. MAKE SURE THE 1/2-13 BOLTS ARE AS CLOSE TO THE I-BEAM FLANGES AS POSSIBLE 4. WHEN SCOREBOARD IS ADJUSTED TO FINAL DESIRED POSITION, TIGHTEN BOLTS FIRMLY 5. IF FLANGE THICKNESS IS MORE THAN 3/4" THICK LONGER BOLTS WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE CUSTOMER'S EXPENSE. STANDARD MOUNTING METHOD TOP VIEW VERTICAL BEAM - FLANGE THICKNESS MUST BE 1/4" - 3/4" 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT - BOLT THREAD MUST ENGAGE ENTIRE DEPTH OF SPRING NUT. BOLT MUST BE TIGHTENED TO 40FT-LB TORQUE 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2" FLAT WASHER I-BEAM CLAMP - ASSURE CLAMP IS TIGHTLY ENGAGED TO I-BEAM AND NUT SPRING NUT SCOREBOARD FRONT OF SCOREBOARD EXPLODED REAR ISOMETRIC VIEW SPRING NUT ***CRITICAL*** MAKE SURE SPRING NUT IS TURNED TO VERTICAL POSITION INSIDE SCOREBOARD CHANNEL I-BEAM CLAMP 1/2" FLAT WASHER 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT DAKTRONICS, INC.THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCE BY ANY MEANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF DAKTRONICS, INC. COPYRIGHT 2010 DAKTRONICS, INC. BROOKINGS, SD 57006 DO NOT SCALE DRAWING PROJ:OUTDOOR SCOREBOARDS TITLE:P1647; POLE MOUNTING OPTIONS DESIGN:DOPPELT DRAWN:DOPPELT DATE:22 MAR 11 SCALE:1/5 SHEET:REV JOB NO: FUNC-TYPE-SIZE 10481841 OF 103P1647E -10 -A REV 01 DATE: 06 OCT 11 REPLACED VERTICAL I-BEAM WITH 6" X 6" SQUARE TUBE BY: JAVA REV 02 DATE: 20 SEP 12 REMOVED CHAMFER FROM 0M-133259 PER EC-7114 BY: LMG REV 03 DATE: 3 JULY 13 ADDED STRUCTURAL NOTE BY: TTF NOTES: - THREADED RODS RUN ALONG BOTH SIDES OF BEAM - RODS DO NOT PASS THROUGH THE FLANGES OF THE BEAM - NO DRILLING NECESSARY - MAKE SURE SPRING NUT IS PERPENDICULAR TO CHANNEL OPENING ON SCOREBOARD STRUCTURAL NOTES: - BOLT TORQUE: 30 FT-LB SIDE VIEW 1/2" FLAT WASHER, LOCK WASHER, AND NUT VERTICAL BEAM 1/2" THREADED ROD SPRING NUT SCOREBOARD REAR MOUNTING ANGLE TOP VIEW SCALE 1/10 1/2" FLAT WASHER LOCK WASHER, AND NUT 1/2" THREADED ROD VERTICAL BEAM FRONT OF DISPLAY SPRING NUT DISPLAY REAR MOUNTING ANGLE ***CRITICAL*** MAKE SURE SPRING NUT IS TURNED TO VERTICAL POSITION INSIDE SCOREBOARD CHANNEL REAR ISOMETRIC VIEW EXTRA THREADED ROD CAN BE CUT OFF AH OU T D O O R E X T R U D E D S C O R E B O A R D S CO M P O N E N T L O C A T I O N ; B A - 2 1 2 5 KD R A G T 18 S E P 1 3 P 1 6 4 7 E 10 A 1= 4 0 KD R A G T 11 5 1 0 3 3 00 A1 5 18" A2 9 15" A2 10 15" A2 11 15" A2 3 15" A2 2 15" A2 1 15" A2 4 15" A2 5 15" A2 6 15" A2 14 15" A2 13 15" A2 12 15" A2 15 15" A3 9 15" A3 1 15" A2 7 15" A3 2 15" A3 10 15" A3 11 15" A3 3 15" A3 4 15" A3 5 15" A3 13 15" A3 12 15" A3 14 15" A3 15 15" A3 16 15" A3 8 15" A3 7 15" A3 6 15" OPTIONAL AT BAT OR PITCH COUNT CAPTION OPTIONAL TIME OR PITCH COUNT CAPTION BA-2125-R/A/W SEE DETAIL A (MASTER DRIVER) @1 OPTIONAL TNMCS 8X32-34MM SEE DETAIL B (SLAVE DRIVER) @2 FRONT VIEW REAR VIEW KNOCKOUTS FOR 1/2" CONDUIT ENCLOSED 16 COLUMN SLAVE LED DRIVER AND POWER/SIGNAL ENCLOSURE @1 (THE COVER HAS BEEN REMOVED TO SHOW THE ENCLOSURE COMPONENT DETAIL) ENCLOSED 16 COLUMN MASTER LED DRIVER AND POWER/SIGNAL ENCLOSURE @1 (THE COVER HAS BEEN REMOVED TO SHOW THE ENCLOSURE COMPONENT DETAIL) A1 6 18" A1 7 18" A1 8 18" A1 9 18" A1 10 18" A1 11 18" A2 1 15" = LED DRIVER NUMBER & LED DRIVER CONNECTOR WIRED TO THAT DIGIT = DIGIT SIZE KEY A1 A3 A2 1 of 2 CITY OF CORCORAN PARK CAPITAL FUND REPORT jheinecke March 11, 2014 9c. Date Park Dedication Memorial Park Maintenance Beginning Balance 2014 354,879.24 9,165.22 Jan-14 Park Dedication (Mattson)3,000.00 2014 YTD ACTIVITY 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ENDING BALANCE 357,879.24 9,165.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CASH FUNDS PROJECT DETAIL CITY OF CORCORAN FARMERS STATE SAVINGS December 31, 2013 Savings Date Expense Interest Revenue Balance 12/2007 Year end balance (8.13) 1,540.94 1,532.81 3/2008 3.83 1,536.64 6/2008 4.30 1,540.94 6/2008 Milbrandt Donation 5,000.00 6,540.94 9/2008 12.38 6,553.32 12/2008 9.57 6,562.89 3/2009 8.10 6,570.99 6/2009 6.84 6,577.83 7/2009 Milbrandt Donation 5,000.00 11,577.83 9/2009 16.81 11,594.64 12/2009 17.55 11,612.19 3/2010 15.63 11,627.82 6/2010 14.50 11,642.32 9/2010 13.98 11,656.30 12/2010 11.76 11,668.06 3/2011 11.51 11,679.57 6/2011 11.65 11,691.22 9/2011 9.45 11,700.67 12/2011 7.21 11,707.88 5/2012 Garden Maintenance (727.77) 10,980.11 3/2012 7.38 10,987.49 6/2012 Garden Maintenance (231.36) 10,756.13 6/2012 7.30 10,763.43 7/2012 Garden Maintenance (107.40) 10,656.03 8/2012 Garden Maintenance (70.00) 10,586.03 10/2012 Garden Maintenance (420.00) 10,166.03 9/2012 - 10,166.03 12/2012 13.22 10,179.25 3/2013 5.26 10,184.51 8/2013 Garden Maintenance (287.50) 9,897.01 6/2013 5.32 9,902.33 9/2013 1.65 9,903.98 10/2013 Garden Maintenance (430.00) 9,473.98 10/2013 Garden Maintenance (310.00) 9,163.98 12/2013 1.24 9,165.22 (2,592.16)$ 216.44$ 11,540.94$ 9,165.22$ TOTAL