HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-08-24 - Council Minutes - Part 1CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August 24, 2006
The Corcoran City Council met on August 24, 2006, at city hall in Corcoran, Call to Order
Minnesota. Present were Mayor Cossette, Councilor Grabowski, Councilor Jacobs,
Councilor Lymangood, and Councilor Thomas. Also present were Administrator Roll Call
Vergin, City Engineer Vander Top, City Planner Lindahl, Public Works Director
Meister, Chief Gormley, and Clerk Lindberg. Mayor Cossette called the meeting to
order at 7:00 p.m.
enda Approval Agenda Approval
MOTION by Grabowski, seconded by Thomas, to approve the agenda with
moving 9. Consent Agenda and 10. Claims to follow 4. Open Forum, adding 8.c.
Letter to the Editor, and adding Continuation of Budget Meeting before
adjourning. Voting Aye: Cossette, Grabowski, Jacobs, Lymangood, and Thomas.
(Motion carried 5:0)
Open Forum & Presentations
Open Forum &
Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council, Director Susan Blood
Presentations
Susan Blood, director of NW Hennepin Human Services, requested Corcoran's
NW Henn. Human
Services, Susan Blood
continued support for the organization. Blood explained organization's mission
was to research, plan, and coordinate human services for 11 NW Hennepin cities.
Of the $1,006,743 funding needed in 2005 the cities' contributions totaled $80,510.
The remainder of the funding was received from grants and government contracts.
Corcoran's portion for 2007 increased by $103 to $2,468.
CONSENT AGENDA
CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION by Grabowski, seconded by Lymangood, to approve the consent
agenda:
a. July 27, 2006 Regular Council Minutes
b. July 27, 2006 Budget Workshop Minutes
c. CIP Purchase — Public Works
Voting Aye: Cossette, Grabowski, Jacobs, Lymangood, and Thomas. (Motion
Carried 5:0)
CLAIMS AS PRESENTED
CLAIMS
Escrow Claims (Fund #500) $7,447.50
MOTION by Cossette, seconded by Thomas, to approve Fund #500 Escrow
claims as presented. Voting Aye: Cossette, Grabowski, Lymangood, and Thomas.
Voting Nay: Jacobs. (Motion carried 4:1)
Building Inspection Claims (Fund #405) $4,505.05
MOTION by Cossette, seconded by Thomas, to approve HRUA claims as
presented. Voting Aye: Cossette, Grabowski, Lymangood, and Thomas. Voting
Nay: Jacobs. (Motion carried 4:1)
All Other Claims/Disbursements as Presented $467,272.26
MOTION by Thomas, seconded by Cossette, to approve all other claims and
disbursements as presented. Voting Aye: Cossette, Grabowski, Lymangood,
Jacobs, and Thomas. (Motion carried 5:0)
PLANNING BUSINESS
PLANNING BUSINESS
Page -1-
CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August 24, 2006
Corcoran Business Park Corcoran Business Park
Planner Lindahl presented an overview of United Properties' application for a
comprehensive plan amendment to reclassify one -acre from residential to business
park, rezoning from A and BP to PUD, preliminary plat, and preliminary PUD
development plan for a commercial development that will include 26,000 square
feet of retail and 518,720 square feet of industrial uses on the 54.10 -acre site
located east of Pioneer Trail and north of Highway 55. On June 1, 2006, the
Planning Commission held a public hearing and tabled the application to allow
United Properties to revise the plans and meet with the neighboring residents. On
August 3, 2006, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of
the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, PUT) preliminary plan, and
preliminary plat as presented at this evening's council meeting. Bill Katter and Dan
Parks of United Properties were present to address questions.
Katter and Parks addressed the issue of screening the frontage road from the
neighboring residential properties with a proposed staggered line of 12 -foot conifer
trees with a 20 -foot wide planting of shrubs. Katter felt the proposal would furnish
adequate residential screening and deter children crossing the frontage road. Katter
also proposed offering each residential property owner an allowance to install a
four -foot black or green chain link security fence along the property line adjacent
to the frontage road.
Katter asked if Council would like the proposed pond to be an amenity park area
for the neighborhood or a green project to use natural resources for project
irrigation.
Grabowski would rather see the pond as a park area with mowed slopes.
Thomas was aware of some very attractive pond areas, but was not sure the
business park environment would be the best setting for the amenities.
Planner Lindahl reported the AUAR for this area specifically stated ponds should
be used for onsite irrigation and to provide native plantings, but the council has
discretion in matters such as this; the AUAR is a guiding document.
Jacobs said if the pond is used for irrigation purposes, the water level could go
down to nothing and any fish would not be able to survive.
Lymangood would prefer a natural look to the pond area.
Cossette did not have a preference; the surrounding properties would be
manicured.
Richard Denison — 22741 Wagon Wheel Lane — suggested a combination of
grooming and native plants.
Jacobs asked if a business in the business park would need the service road
extended east to Rolling Hills Road. Engineer Vander Top explained the MnDOT
funding of the frontage road was based on a connection to Rolling Hills Road and
emergency vehicle access to this large of a project would require more than one
access. Rolling Hills Road sight distance would be a concern that would be defined
in the feasibility report.
The discussion changed to the frontage road screening. Several options were
discussed including the possibility of allowing the security fencing in the right of
way along the north side of the frontage road.
Page -2-
CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August 24, 2006
Lymangood referenced buildings #3 and #4 where the loading docks face the north
and was concerned with the sound and light issues to the residential neighborhood
on the north. Lymangood suggested restricting hours of truck deliveries to these
two buildings. Cossette voiced his concern with the esthetics of the loading docks
of these two buildings in relation to the trail and suggested the buildings be turned
180 degrees or positioned similarly to buildings #7 and #8. Katter stated the
building themselves would lessen the Highway 55 traffic sounds to the residential
neighborhood. Chris Hickok, representing United Properties, said the marketing
standpoint of the Business Park would be the ability to see the office fronts of the
buildings from Highway 55 and from the City's standpoint the development is the
gateway to the City of Corcoran and loading docks facing Highway 55 would not
be very attractive.
Some of the other issues discussed were no gas stations would be allowed in the
development, project funding would be addressed in the feasibility report and final
plat process, excessive rainwater flow to the wetlands north of the project, depth of
the pond slope, installation of signals at Highway 55 and Pioneer Trail before retail
businesses are allowed, gate installation in wall north of buildings #7 and #8, and
the inclusion of other City roads into the feasibility study.
MOTION by Lymangood, seconded by Grabowski, to add ll.eee. No idling
trucks shall be allowed at the loading docks on Building 5 between the hours
of 11:30 p.m. and 5:00 a.m. to Resolution No. 2006 -47 approving the Preliminary
PUD Plan. Voting Aye: Cossette, Grabowski, Thomas, Jacobs, and Lymangood.
(Motion carried 5:0)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Resolution No. 2006 -45
MOTION by Grabowski, seconded by Thomas, to approve Resolution No. 2006-
45 approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Voting Aye: Cossette,
Grabowski, Thomas, and Lymangood. Voting Nay: Jacobs. (Motion carried 4:1)
Zonine Ordinance Amendment, Ordinance No. 235
MOTION by Grabowski, seconded by Thomas, to approve Zoning Ordinance
Amendment, Ordinance No. 235. Voting Aye: Cossette, Grabowski, Thomas,
Jacobs, and Lymangood. (Motion carried 5:0)
Rezoning Findings of Fact, Resolution No. 2006 -46
MOTION by Lymangood, seconded by Thomas, to approve Resolution No. 2006-
46 to approve the Rezoning Findings of Fact. Voting Aye: Cossette, Grabowski,
Thomas, and Lymangood. Voting Nay: Jacobs. (Motion carried 4:1)
Planned Unit Development Plan, Resolution No. 2006 -47
MOTION by Grabowski, seconded by Lymangood, to change item 11. to "The
developer must comply with the following conditions prior to approval of the final
plat:" Voting Aye: Cossette, Grabowski, Lymangood, Jacobs, and Thomas.
(Motion carried 5:0)
MOTION by Grabowski, seconded by Thomas, to change item l l .h. and 11 j. to:
ll.h. The plans shall be revised to include emergency exits (pedestrian egress
doors) from the internal truck loading areas on Buildings 7 and 8. The buildings
must still comply with Section 1060.060, Subd. 3(F) of the Zoning Ordinance, with
requires these loading areas to be completely screened by an intervening building.
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Resolution
No. 2006 -45
Zoning Ordinance
Amendment, Ordinance
No. 235
Rezoning Findings of
Fact, Resolution No.
2006 -46
Planned Unit
Development Plan,
Resolution No. 2006 -47
Page -3-
CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August 24, 2006
11 j. The developer shall work with staff to revise the landscape plan on the north
side of the frontage road. The plans shall provide screening from the residential
properties on Wagon Wheel Lane. The applicant shall:
i. Revise the current plan to provide shade trees on the north side of
the frontage road, in addition to the proposed conifers, in order to
continue the streetscape throughout the development. It appears
that some Green Spire Lindens could be added on the north side of
the frontage road to continue the street tree theme.
ii. The applicant shall add a 4 -foot chain link security fence in lieu of
some of the proposed landscaping in this area.
Voting Aye: Cossette, Grabowski, Lymangood, Jacobs, and Thomas. (Motion
carried 5:0)
MOTION by Grabowski, seconded by Lymangood, to approve Resolution No.
2006 -47 approving the Preliminary PUD as revised. Voting Aye: Grabowski,
Thomas, and Lymangood. Voting Nay: Cossette and Jacobs. (Motion carried 3:2)
Preliminary Plat, Resolution No. 2006 -48
MOTION by Grabowski, seconded by Lymangood, to approve Resolution No.
2006 -48 approving the Preliminary Plat. Voting Aye: Grabowski, Thomas, and
Lymangood. Voting Nay: Cossette and Jacobs. (Motion carried 3:2)
Cossette expressed concern that the view of building #5 was too open and needed
more screening; it would be better if the building was positioned differently.
Jacobs said it was premature to approve the plans for United Properties due to the
impacts of those plans for the undefined frontage road east to Rolling Hills Road.
He added that the plans for the road link to Rolling Hills Road was not yet fully
documented or understood.
Order Feasibility Report for Frontage Road Resolution No. 2006 -49
MOTION by Thomas, seconded by Grabowski, to approve Resolution No. 2006-
49 ordering the Feasibility Report for Frontage Road. Voting Aye: Cossette,
Grabowski, Thomas, and Lymangood. Voting Nay: Jacobs. (Motion carried 4:1)
MOTION by Lymangood, seconded by Thomas, to address item 48.a. and then
adjourn the meeting. Voting Aye: Grabowski, Thomas, Jacobs, Cossette, and
Lymangood. (Motion carried 5:0)
Project Assistance — U of M Humphrey Institute
Administrator Vergin explained the University of Minnesota's Humphrey Institute
was offering free project economic development assistance. Vergin suggested this
service would be beneficial to promote business development in the southwest and
downtown area.
MOTION by Lymangood, seconded by Grabowski, to utilize the service offered
by the University of MN's Humphrey Institute with the inclusion of using the
service to update the revenue and expenditure study data base of comparable cities
and conduct surveys for updating the comprehensive plan. Voting Aye: Grabowski,
Thomas, Jacobs, Cossette, and Lymangood. (Motion carried 5:0)
Preliminary Plat,
Resolution No. 2006 -48
Order Feasibility Report
for Frontage Road,
Resolution No. 2006 -49
NEW BUSINESS
Project Assistance — U of
MHumphrey Institute
Page -4-
CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August 24, 2006
Neat Budget Meeting Next Budget Meeting
Administrator Vergin announced the budget meeting was recessed to August 31,
2006, at 6:00 p.m.
Adjournment Adjournment
MOTION by Grabowski, seconded by Thomas to adjourn the meeting at 10:40
p.m. Voting Aye: Grabowski, Jacobs, Cossette, Lymangood, and Thomas. (Motion
carried 5:0)
Bea Lindberg, City Clerk
Page -5-