HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-12-13 - Council Minutes
CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 13, 2007
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Call to Order
The Corcoran City Council met on December 13, 2007, at city hall in Corcoran, Roll Call
Minnesota. Present were Mayor Guenthner, Councilor Grabowski, Councilor
Jacobs, Councilor Hudok and Councilor Thomas. Also present were Administrator
Vergin, City Engineer Rhein, City Planner Gartner, Police Chief Gormley, Public
Works Director Meister and City Attorney Langel. Mayor Guenthner called the
meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
Agenda Approval
AGENDA APPROVAL
Councilor Hudok requested Bechtold Road conditions be added under unscheduled
items.
MOTION
made by Grabowski, seconded by Hudok to move Item 8a. Equipment
CIP up in the agenda to be item 7 iii. Voting Aye: Grabowski, Guenthner, Hudok,
Jacobs and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0)
MOTION
made by Hudok, seconded by Grabowski, to accept additional
information provided by Councilor Jacobs relating to the Truth in Taxation data.
Voting Aye: Grabowski, Hudok, and Jacobs. Voting Nay: Guenthner and Thomas
(Motion carried 3:2)
MOTION
made by Thomas, seconded by Guenthner, to approve the modified
agenda. Voting Aye: Guenthner and Thomas Voting Nay: Grabowski, Hudok and
Jacobs (Motion failed 2:3)
MOTION
made by Grabowski, seconded by Hudok to approve the modified
agenda eliminating item 5. Recognition of Corcoran Resident and item 6. RJ’s CUP
Amendment.
MOTION TO AMEND
made by Guenthner, seconded by Thomas to further
eliminate items 9. Consent Agenda, 11. Council and Staff Reports and 12.
Unscheduled Items from the agenda. Voting Aye: Thomas and Guenthner Voting
Nay: Grabowski, Hudok and Jacobs (Motion failed 2:3)
MOTION TO AMEND
made by Hudok, seconded by Grabowski to eliminate
Items 5. Recognition of Corcoran Resident, 6. RJ’s CUP Amendment, 11. Council
and Staff Reports, and 12. Unscheduled Items from the agenda. Voting Aye:
Grabowski, Hudok and Jacobs Voting Nay: Guenthner and Thomas (Motion
carried 3:2)
VOTE ON MOTION AS AMENDED
to approve the modified agenda
eliminating Items 5, 6, 11 and 12. Voting Aye: Grabowski, Hudok and Jacobs
Voting Nay: Guenthner and Thomas (Motion carried 3:2)
Open Forum &
OPEN FORUM & ANNOUNCEMENTS
Announcements:
Steve Dodge, President of the Corcoran JC’s expressed his appreciation for Chad
Robran’s service and his support to the JC’s and the community.
John Boos explained that he was going to purchase property in Corcoran. He
applied for an interim use permit to allow a home occupation, which was granted
with a requirement by the council for the septic to be investigated. The
investigation found the soil to be contaminated which has now created a financial
disaster. He is requesting a full refund of his fees he paid to the City to process his
application. Mr. Boos distributed a letter to the City regarding his request.
Page -1-
CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 13, 2007
UNFINISHED BUSINESS Unfinished Business:
2008 Budget/Levy, Resolution No. 2007-97 2008 Budget/Levy,
Resolution No. 2007-97
Administrator Vergin clarified to the council that the Equipment CIP Plan is a plan
that requires bonding in 2008 and levy in 2009 and there is no impact on the 2008
budget.
Administrator Vergin reviewed with the council the material that they received in
their packet in regards to the budget.
Councilor Jacobs presented to the council some handouts.
MOTION
made by Thomas, seconded by Guenthner, to approve Resolution No.
2007-97, A Resolution adopting the Final Tax Levy 2007, collectible in 2008.
There was some discussion about the increase in the police department budget and
it was suggested decreasing the budget by eliminating some hiring of police
officers and to ask the county for assistance for police coverage. Police Chief
Gormley explained to the council the reasoning of hiring of full time officers
compared to hiring part time officers. If the community needs to wait for assistant
from county officers, there most likely will be a delay in a county officer arriving
at the scene, which could be critical.
A suggestion was made to limit the growth to 3%. Request staff to figure out where
to decrease the budget allowing only for a 3% increase. Concern was raised that if
the Staff is requested to reduce the budget by an arbitrary amount, then the Council
should allow them to set policy in order to reach the requested goal.
Chief Gormley added that if the Council were to set the increase to only 3% the
police department wouldn’t be able to maintain the police coverage that is needed
for the community.
A suggestion was made to modify the budget to create a 90-day delay on any
hiring. There was some discussion about staff and council setting priorities in
where the city can afford to cut the budget and which departments require priority
for hiring. Staff should shift priorities to ensure the ability to provide core services
to the public.
VOTE ON MOTION:
Voting Aye: Guenthner and Thomas Voting Nay:
Grabowski, Hudok and Jacobs (Motion failed 2:3)
MOTION
made by Grabowski, seconded by Hudok approving Resolution No.
2007-97 capping the budget increase to 3% over 2007 expenditures and for staff to
work through the budget to make the appropriate reductions through out the
budget.
There was some discussion about what the budget increase amount would be if the
cap was set at 3%. This lead into discussion about insurance premiums and fire
department cost for coverage taking up most of the 3% cap increase amount.
Administrator Vergin added that if the council approves the 3% cap the staff will
have to cut an additional $162,594 from the budget.
Page -2-
CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 13, 2007
VOTE ON MOTION: Voting Aye: Grabowski, Hudok and Jacobs Voting Nay:
Thomas and Guenthner (Motion carried 3:2)
Additional Changes / Modifications
It was suggested that staff take time to work with the 3% increase cap and council
to discuss line item modifications at a later time.
Equipment CIP Plan 2008-2009 Equipment CIP Plan
2008-2009
Administrator Vergin explained that the City started a program in 2001, allowing
for the purchasing of equipment through a bonding program. This plan allows
each department to buy and replace equipment as needed. Each department has
identified their needs 2008 and 2009. The Police Department is $155,200, Public
Works is $355,000, and the Technology CIP is $90,000, for a total of $600,200.
The city is able to finance purchases every third year with a five-year bond, which
is structured in a manner to keep the levy consistent over time.
There was discussion about scheduling the replacement of equipment. That buying
new equipment is sometimes better than spending money on the many repairs
needed on the older equipment. It was suggested to discuss this again in
February/March to allow time for the staff to provide background information and
replacement needs of the current equipment. Public Works Superintendent Meister
expressed his concern about this suggestion because the public works department
needs to place orders for some of the equipment as soon as possible for delivery in
June or July. There was consensus that the Staff could still come forward with
recommendations prior to the CIP being approved.
Pavement Management –
Rural Collector Roads
Pavement Management – Rural Collector Roads
A power point presentation was given by City Engineer Rhein and Administrator
Vergin. This presentation reviewed goals and issues of the Rural Collector Road
System. There are 13 roads in the system, out of these 13 roads there were 6 top
ranked roads identified in terms of urgency to be repaired. Draft Phase 1
Improvement is to be approximate 25% of the overall Rural Collector Roads
System. From the analysis the Draft Phase 1 identified by staff includes Trail
Haven Road (south of Cr 30), Larkin Road, Willow Drive and Kalk Road. The
estimated cost of this phase will be $3,900,000. Funding sources can include
bonds, assessments, and area charges. City Engineer Rhein explained the key
points in regards to the Area Charge and explained what the next steps are that the
city needs to take.
Administrator Vergin presented the bonding analysis/tax impact to properties. She
emphasized that all scenarios are based on today’s dollars. One of the bonding
options for phase 1 would be a 4 million General Obligation Bond. This would be
a 15-year debt schedule with a 4% interest rate. This would be 100% levied
against general property taxes, which would require a referendum and no
assessments to benefiting properties. Another option is for 80% to be levied
against general property taxes and 20% to be assessed against benefiting
properties. The last option presented for phase 1 is 70% levied against general
property taxes and 30% assessed against benefiting properties.
She also presented the bonding option for if the City were to decide to improve all
of the collector roads. This would require a $16 million General Obligation Bond.
Page -3-
CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 13, 2007
An option for this bond would be a 30-year debt schedule with 100% being levied
against general property taxes, which requires a referendum. With this option there
will be no assessments to benefiting properties. Another option presented was
80% being levied against property taxes and 20% assessed against benefiting
properties. The last option presented is to levy 70% against general property taxes
and 30% assessed against benefiting properties.
Revenue resources include Municipal State Aid Funds which can only be used on
MSA designated roads. Roads that are considered MSA are Kalk Road, Larkin
Road (Willow Drive to Old Settlers Road), Schutte Road, Trail Haven Road,
Horseshoe Trail (Rolling Hills Road to Willow Road) and Willow Drive (North of
Horseshoe Trail). Allowing for other obligations, MSA funds toward Rural
Collector Roads could range from $50,000 to $100,000 per year. The development
agreements that are currently in place are Hodgin Acres, Donita and Hietke Farms.
There was some discussion about what the city needs to do and what the time line
is for having a referendum for a 100% levy. This lead into a discussion about how
the levy option would affect property owners with building rights versus the affects
they would have if the city were to choose the assessment option. It was
questioned if the City can do a referendum and assess less than 20%.
A suggestion was made that a starting point could be to determine where the larger
building rights are through out the city and which area of the city would have the
most impact. This lead into discussion about how the referendum is great to be
able to get the communities input, but it isn’t fair to properties that don’t benefit
from the projects.
City Engineer Rhein explained that he would recommend the city to go with the
assessment approach. The property will benefit from the project, and the city
should be able to collect from that value. It should be more of an expense for
properties that do benefit from the project than the properties that have no benefit
of the project.
There was some discussion about whether or not amounts could be broken down or
can be compared to newer homes assessment amounts compared to older home
assessment amounts.
In regards to Phase 1, staff was directed to build a scenario, of if the city offered a
50% increase on parcels greater than 40 acres of building rights sale, how many
selling rights would that involve? This gives the council the ability to start looking
at value of those sale rights. This lead into a discussion on advantages or
disadvantages of selling rights on smaller parcels. Council consensus was for staff
to provide council with a couple different scenarios.
There was some discussion on whether or not staff should continue to create
scenarios for Phase 1 or for the whole project. Council consensus was for staff to
concentrate on creating options for phase 1 only.
The scenarios will be presented at the second council meeting in January.
NEW BUSINESS
New Business:
Page -4-
CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 13, 2007
Administering Corcoran
Administering Corcoran Advisory Staff Resource
Advisory Staff Resource
Councilor Jacobs expressed his concern that there may be a lack of communication
between city staff and the advisory staff. All staff was directed to work together
and make sure communications are working.
Attendance at Council Meetings by Planner Gartner Attendance at Council
Meetings by Planner
It was suggested that the planner attend the standard planning agenda night. But if
Gartner
the council has matters that involve the planner then the council is to determine if
the matters can be done at the second council meeting of the month. If the issues
are needed to be resolved sooner then the second council meeting than council is to
contact staff and they will contact the planner with the issues and can decide if he
RFP’s for Financial
is needed at the first meeting of the month.
Consultants
RFP’s for Financial Consultants
Councilor Jacobs had some concerns and questions about a free analysis service
given to the city from securities vendors, specifically services provided to the City
at “no charge to the city”. He is suggesting that the city prepare RFP’s, so during
the Council’s 2008 appointments they can properly screen for the persons and
firms that get involved in major expenditures of City funds. There was no action
taken by the Council.
Consent Agenda Items
Approved:
CONSENT AGENDA
Bryant Topography and
MOTION
made by Grabowski, seconded by Hudok, to approve Consent Agenda:
Wetland Waiver,
9d. Bryant Topography and Wetland Waiver, Resolution 2007-98
Resolution 2007-98
9e. JC’s Gambling License at Stanchion, Resolution 2007-99
JC’s Gambling License at
Stanchion, Resolution
9f. November 1, 2007 Jt. Meeting with Planning Commission
2007-99
9g. Donation to Police Department, Resolution No. 2007-100
November 1, 2007 Joint.
Mayor Guenthner acknowledged the donation from Jennifer Ryan and Brandon
Meeting with Planning
Wise on behalf of Dick Wise and he expressed his appreciation for this donation. It
Commission
was suggested that Police Chief Gormley provide recognition for this donation at
Donation to Police
the next council meeting.
Department, Resolution
VOTE ON MOTION:
Voting Aye: Grabowski, Guenthner, Hudok, Jacobs and
No. 2007-100
Thomas (Motion carried 5:0)
MOTION
made by Grabowski, seconded by Thomas to approve the consent
October 3, 2007
agenda items as modified:
Pavement Management
9a. October 3, 2007 Pavement Management Minutes
Minutes
Mayor Guenthner stated he would like to receive these minutes in a timelier
manner.
November 19, 2007
9b. November 19, 2007 Council Minutes
Council Minutes
th
Page 7, 4 paragraph, “acre” should read “animal unit”
9c. December 3, 2007 Truth In Taxation Minutes
December 3, 2007 Truth
rdth
Page 2, 3 paragraph, 4 sentence should read “We’ve had 3 workshops and In Taxation Minutes
several council meetings but no hard proposals have been proposed.”
Last page, last paragraph “Lymangood” should be replaced with “Hudok”
Page -5-
CITY OF CORCORAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 13, 2007
VOTE ON MOTION: Voting Aye: Grabowski, Guenthner, Hudok, Jacobs and
Thomas (Motion carried 5:0)
CLAIMS
Approval of Claims
a. Escrow Claims (Fund #500) $6224.99
MOTION
made by Grabowski, seconded by Hudok, to approve the escrow claims
as presented, totaling $6224.99. Voting Aye: Grabowski, Guenthner, Hudok,
Jacobs and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0)
b. Building Inspection Claims $21,387.92
MOTION
made by Hudok, seconded by Grabowski, to approve the building
inspection claims as presented, totaling $21,387.92. Voting Aye: Grabowski,
Guenthner, Hudok, Jacobs and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0)
c. All Other Claims $ 217,925.69
MOTION
made by Hudok, seconded by Thomas, to approve the all other claims
as presented, totaling $217,925.69. Voting Aye: Grabowski, Guenthner, Hudok,
Jacobs and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0)
ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment
MOTION
made by Grabowski, seconded by Hudok, to adjourn at 9:46 p.m.
Voting Aye: Grabowski, Guenthner, Jacobs, Hudok and Thomas (Motion carried
5:0)
______________________________
Barb Larson, City Clerk
Page -6-