Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-12-19 Parks and Trails Agenda Packet Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission Agenda December 19, 2024 7:00 pm *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Parks and Trails Commission Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.corcoranmn.gov. OIGINAL 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval 4. Minutes a. Minutes – November 21, 2024, Meeting* 5. Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6. Presentations – None 7. Unfinished Business a. Park Enhancement Program (PEP)* b. City Park Survey Results* c. City Park 60% Design Review* 8. New Business a. DRAFT 2024 Annual Report and 2025 Priorities* 9. Reports/Information a. Planning Project Update – Information Only* b. Parks, Recreation, and Trails Update* 10. Subcommittee & Miscellaneous Reports a. Garden Club Report b. Park Dedication Fund* 11. Other Business/Announcements 12. Adjournment HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Parks and Trails Commission meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 815 9742 6469 Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81597426469 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 815 9742 6469 *Please note in-person comments will be taken at the scheduled meeting where noted. Comments received via email to Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck at jchristensenbuck@corcoranmn.gov or via public comment cards will also be accepted. All email and public comment cards must be received by the Wednesday prior to scheduled Parks and Trails meeting. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov 1 Corcoran Parks and Trails Meeting Minutes November 21, 2024 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission met on November 21, 2024, at City Hall in Corcoran, MN. Present were Commissioners Anderson, Erzberger, Friedrich, Nybo, Schmidt, and Strehler. Absent was Commissioner Christenson. Present at City Hall was Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck, Public Works Director Mattson, and City Administrator Tobin. 1.Call to Order/Roll Call Vice-Chair Friedrich called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Vice-Chair Friedrich invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Agenda Approval Motion: Made by Nybo, seconded by Erzberger, to approve the agenda as presented. Voting Aye: Anderson, Erzberger, Friedrich, Nybo, Schmidt, and Strehler. (Motion carried 6:0) 4.Minutes a. Minutes – October 17, 2024, Meeting Motion: Made by Friedrich, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes as presented. Voting Aye: Anderson, Erzberger, Friedrich, Nybo, Schmidt, and Strehler. (Motion carried 6:0) 5.Open Forum Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck noted no attendance in the audience. 6.Presentations – None 7.Unfinished Business a. Winter Trail Maintenance Update Public Works Director Mattson updated the Commission on the current status of the winter trail maintenance system starting with background from the discussion held on this topic in 2023 when a draft Snow and Ice Policy, and related ordinances were reviewed by the Commission in 2023. He clarified that while the ordinances were adopted, implementation of the policy was paused since limited new trails have been accepted by the City with the notable exception of the new Hackamore Road trail. It was explained that currently the 2025 budget and projected investments does not include anything set aside for winter maintenance. The City Council is starting to move forward with more aggressive project close out measures, so the City does anticipate accepting several portions of trails at Bass Lake Crossing and Ravinia over the winter. Recent efforts in Ravinia to repair damaged trails not yet accepted were noted. It was also stated the City updated the Engineering Design Detail Plates to include root barriers to minimize damage in the future. He disclosed that winter trails maintenance is expensive, and it is unclear how this is to be paid for among other competing interests. He asked the Commission to provide guidance as to priority areas for maintenance to bring back to City Council for discussion. Commission Nybo asked what the City currently has for equipment for winter maintenance of paved trails. Public Works Director Mattson explained that the equipment required depends on the trail; currently, there are trailers, trucks, tractors, and smaller equipment, such as a blower attachment, that can be utilized for winter trail maintenance. Commissioner Erzberger asked what paths Public Works Director recommends for maintenance based on the current equipment available or other criteria to consider. 4a. 2 Public Works Director Mattson recommended considering connectivity of the trail and use of the trail when prioritizing maintenance more so than the type of equipment required. City Administrator Tobin clarified that in addition to the delay in accepting new trails part of the reason why it was not budgeted was due to direction from City Council to maintain a flat tax rate which makes it difficult to provide new services as this generates new expenses, such as people and equipment. It was noted the bulk of the City’s trails are recreational and are not relied on as routes to get to school or work. He stated not plowing trails can be better for winter recreation, such as snowshoeing, while noting neighborhoods with older populations benefit from the use of salt in addition to clearing snow. He added Three Rivers Park District recently confirmed they will not maintain their regional trails in the winter season, so this also needs to be a consideration for the City when contemplating service standards and budget constraints. Another strategy discussed was to handle trail maintenance through Homeowners Associations, such as Bass Lake Crossing, and what agreements would need to be in place for HOAs to maintain City-owned trails. Public Works Director Mattson stated a winter maintenance system will always lead to some level of complaints as it is a challenging standard to achieve. He provided that setting realistic expectations while coordinating efforts and timing of snow removal are important elements to contemplate to minimize conflict caused by disorganized sequencing in snow removal efforts. Commissioner Friedrich posed the question whether walkable trails in Corcoran are desired all year round or on a seasonal basis. She stated keeping in mind the current spacing of available trails in Corcoran it may make sense for winter trail maintenance to wait for another 5 years. She asked if residents maintain their own sidewalks. Public Works Director Mattson confirmed the City has an ordinance requiring property owners, or HOAs, to clear their respective sidewalk. Commissioner Friedrich asked what the current plan is for sequencing of snow removal by the City. Public Works Director Mattson stated determining the priority and timing of snow removal on trails would be the second step in the planning process after affirming a desire to invest in winter trail maintenance. He explained the draft Snow and Ice Policy discussed in 2023 mimicked Chanhassen’s policy and classified routes as “Priority A” and “Priority B”. “Priority A” is typically main streets and are eligible for overtime. “Priority B” would likely be handled as a second round or shift of plowing for neighborhood streets, side streets, and priority trails. Commissioner Friedrich asked for clarification that trails would not be eligible for overtime pay and would be completed as time allows. City Administrator Tobin confirmed that would be the case. Commissioner Erzberger stated a desire to prioritize any trails that provide a route for students to a pickup stop for school should be considered a priority should such a route ever be created in the future. He also stated that maintenance of trails in areas that don’t have a sidewalk should also be considered. Commissioner Anderson provided an example of how snow removal efforts can be impeded by wind; he suggested that it may be better to post that trails can be used during the winter at the users’ own risk. Commissioner Schmidt stated that it may make sense for Corcoran’s trails to not be plowed in favor of winter recreational opportunities. He asked if there is a ballpark figure to reference in order to understand the cost to maintain a mile of trail to allow for better planning in the future. City Administrator Tobin and Public Works Director Mattson stated a range could be provided after collecting data on different factors. Commissioner Friedrich stated there may eventually be a loop in Ravinia based on the trail map that may make sense for winter maintenance. Public Works Director Mattson agreed and stated there will be more loops in Bellwether too as that development starts to close out. He explained the City receives a lot of requests to plow the trail on County Road 19 which is a Three Rivers trail. He stated the City can receive a small stipend to do this, but staff is not recommending this trail be plowed at this time. He agreed with previous comments that wind does cause snow to drift which will create a need to plow more frequently and regularly. Commissioner Friedrich asked if there is a way to mark trails for winter recreation opportunities so that they are not lost under the snow. City Administrator Tobin confirmed there are inexpensive strategies, such as colored flat posts, that can be used to mark trails. Commissioner Friedrich asked if marking the trails and replacing markers as needed would become a 3 maintenance issue of Public Works. Public Works Director Mattson confirmed that would be a task completed by Public Works but they do mark key areas currently. He explained this is less expensive than maintaining the trails but agreed there would be some additional expense to mark the trails. Commissioner Friedrich stated she also experiences large snow drifts and sees how this could become a problem with upkeeping trails in the winter. She asked when all the trails are expected to be accepted as it may make sense to develop a maintenance plan once all the trails are accepted and main trails can be identified in specific portions of the City. Public Works Director Mattson explained the acceptance of trail would be on a rolling basis, and he anticipates there will be less of gap between initial construction and City acceptance of trails. City Administrator Tobin posed the question of what happens with and what is desired for snow mobile trails in the long-term as the City develops. Commissioner Friedrich stated that as the remaster of City park moves forward, there could be a trail that provide a full loop and would be used more frequently by the general public to the level that winter maintenance is justified. Public Works Director Mattson agreed this makes sense particularly because equipment can be stored at City park for this maintenance rather than hauling equipment from the Public Works facility. Commissioner Erzberger asked about winter maintenance level anticipated as it relates to the planned park building at City Park. He added it makes sense that this would be a more accessible area prioritized for maintenance. He noted it seems like isolated plowing seems more feasible for a short-term approach. Commissioner Anderson asked if the Northwest Trails Association still utilizes trails in the City for snowmobiling adding they have been a good partner with the City over the years. Commissioner Schmidt asked whether the City or the Northwest Trails Association maps snowmobile trails. Public Works Director Mattson explained Northwest Trails Association provides a map of negotiated trails for snowmobiling independent from the City. He noted that sometimes the trails cross right-of-way and as properties develop the trail alignment can change. He added the City partners with the Northwest Trails Association as it relates to grants they receive. Commissioner Friedrich stated the City may want to consider snowmobiling while determining the long-term vision for winter recreation. She also posed the question on whether Corcoran will ever be a walkable community or if it will be more spread out. If it won’t be a walkable community with destinations, then maybe it makes sense for trails to focus on winter recreational opportunities. Public Works Director Mattson provided his opinion that best case scenario there will be localized areas that are walkable, such as the planned downtown area once it is built out. Commissioner Erzberger stated the draft Ice and Snow Policy talks about property damage but does not seem to contemplate property damage as a result of maintaining trails noting damage to items such as fencing and landscaping should be considered as part of the policy. Public Works Director Mattson explained the standard trail easement is 20’ and the standard trail width is 8’. In theory, there should be 6’ of buffer on both sides, and fences and landscaping should not be within that easement. He agreed it doesn’t hurt to include language in the policy as suggested. Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck summarized the Commission feedback as follows: wind gusts in the community may cause a need for continuous plowing which is not desired; priority areas for winter maintenance in the future include trails that are looped, lead to destinations, or are located in localized walkable areas; there is not a strong desire for winter maintenance to occur in 2025 considering the budget constraints; and the Commission is open to work with HOAs to complete trail maintenance as long as the City’s liability can be covered. City Administrator Tobin added staff will come back to the Commission at a later date with statistics and data as it relates to cost estimates. He added another theme he heard throughout the discussion is whether the City’s vision is to offer a more walkable experience versus a rural adventure experience which may be a good topic to explore with the next comprehensive plan. 8. New Business a. Boardwalk in Bellwether Design Public Works Director Mattson introduced the boardwalk at Bellwether noting this is the last piece of the trail system to be completed as part of that development. This will essentially be a bridge that spans over the wetland area owned by the City between the City’s open space park and the community center at Bellwether. He explained the final design and minimum design standards for this have been a topic of 4 ongoing discussion. After extensive conversations with the developer over the last year, the engineering memo provided to the Commission provide the recommended minimum design standards. He added the cost of the boardwalk will the developer’s responsibility. He noted the proposed standards require the boardwalk to be at least 1’ above the ordinary high-water level to keep the boardwalk above water levels during or after a large rain event. This means there are areas where a 5’ drop from the top of the wood railing of the boardwalk to the ground is expected. Staff also highlighted potential features that can be provided above the minimum design standards such as a viewing area, educational signs of environmental benefits in the area, or some type of lighting. Public Works Director Mattson asked the Commission to prioritize which ideas they would like to see along the boardwalk. He explained that the proposed baseline design is for pedestrian use only and will not be set up for winter maintenance or golf cart usage. He explained that if the Commission wants to advocate for an increased level of design for something above and beyond pedestrian use, this would be at the cost of the City and require further negotiations with the developer and City Council. Commissioner Friedrich asked if there is a difference in the anticipated lifespan or sturdiness of the different proposed options. She noted example one in the packet looks similar to an unfinished framed wall and is not an ideal aesthetic. She stated the third example has a more finished appearance. Public Works Director Mattson confirmed the strength between the different options are all similar, and they can key in on specific aesthetic details if something is not desired as the design is finalized. He said soil conditions will influence where a more robust design is necessary. He iterated that any design aspects above the minimum standards are expected to be the City’s responsibility. He stated that the Commission can recommend further discussions with the developer focus on providing a more aesthetically pleasing design in place of other supplemental options, such as a lookout. Commissioner Anderson stated his opinion that the proposed options are dreary, minimal, and are missing elements such as arches and curves that were included in previous discussions with the Commission. He stated his disappointment in use of wood siding and preferred use of stainless-steel wire. Considering the length of the bridge, he stated he would like to see something of interest, even if it is a place to sit down, to break up the length of the bridge. Commissioner Erzberger agreed with the recommendation to include some place to sit down along the boardwalk as part of a lookout area. He added he would not be an advocate of making the boardwalk vehicle ready considering that it ties into the open space park. He added he would also like to see it a bit more aesthetically pleasing as well. Commissioner Schmidt stated a composite material used on decks would be preferable. Public Works Director Mattson explained composite material may not have the same grip as compared to the materials proposed, but added staff could explore a composite railing with a wood base. Commissioner Erzberger asked if it is known where the railings would stop. Public Works Director Mattson explained the railings would not span the entire length of the boardwalk, and the exact locations will be provided as the design spec is further finalized. He stated there would likely be a transition between areas that require a railing versus areas that do not require a railing as required by the MN State Building Code. He clarified railings are required where the boardwalk will be 30” or more above the ground, and he clarified it would be measured from the ground not the water level. Councilor Nichols asked if the proposed minimum design standards will accommodate wheelchairs. Public Works Director Mattson and City Administrator Tobin confirmed the design will be ADA accessible. City Administrator Tobin added that one of the operational questions is whether the boardwalk is closed down during the winter since it won’t be maintained. Commissioner Friedrich confirmed some kind of lighting on the boardwalk would be nice to allow people to walk during the night. Commissioner Erzberger asked for hours of City parks. Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck confirmed the hours are 6AM to 11PM. Commissioner Nybo agreed lighting would look beautiful along the boardwalk and stated a desire for lighting to be solar powered to address long-term maintenance costs. City Administrator Tobin commended staff efforts to negotiate design standards with the developer. He explained the anticipated City costs of the overall project have decreased to allow allocation of funds for other parks and trails projects. Public Works Director Mattson stated that if the decision is to go with a more minimal design and City Council approves, this will go back to the developer to complete final design. He explained there may still be 5 permitting and soil boring required before the project moves forward. The Commission consensus was to prioritize a lookout with a bench to break up the span of the boardwalk. The second priority was to provide an aesthetic improvement such as incorporating a composite substitute. The third priority is incorporating electrical lighting. The Commission recommended removing educational signage from the lists of supplemental options to incorporate. Public Works Director Mattson added that the design used by Three Rivers utilizes wood rather than composite. He also confirmed that composite will add cost to the project. There was consensus from the Commission that example #1 was not a desirable aesthetic. b. Former Cropland Seeding Public Works Director Mattson provided context that Hennepin County changed their tax policy on City property rented out for agricultural purposes which led to significant fiscal impacts. This has led to discussions on how to maintain the portion of the City Park previously used for agricultural cropland. He noted that other areas in the City that were being used for cropland will be put into a 10-year program to convert the land into a wildlife habitat which will be largely funded for with grants with the watershed and Hennepin County. Now the conversation is focused on the three former cropland fields at City Park. Is there a desire to enter some or all fields into a similar program that can be funded through a grant and to what extent? Commissioner Anderson noted there is a creek that runs between the three fields. He expressed a desire to do a project that enhances the creek, potentially incorporating trails. He added this area will likely want to turn into woods but controlled burning every three years will help control that while burning remains possible. He also stated the City should strategically incorporate and place desirable trees, such as Oak Savanah, for enhancement at the park. Public Works Director Mattson explained that tree programs as part of a grant program are scored based on the conduciveness of the location proposed. He stated that if there are areas that score relatively high for a tree program this could be brought back for further discussion. He explained enhancement programs would be a long term plan requiring investment, prioritization, and coordination with other agencies such as the watershed. Commissioner Erzberger stated a desire to activate the area in the short term by converting the space into natural prairie with a walking trail. Public Works Director Mattson clarified if there are desired short-term, mid-term, and long-term strategies and outcomes, staff will use this to identify a plan for maintenance and implementation. Commissioner Strehler asked for the size of the three fields in acres, and what the cost would be to plant native grass. Public Works Director Mattson confirmed the fields make up 16.8 acres. He explained the cost is unknown at this time and would be determined after evaluation of applicable nmaintenance programs. He pointed to properties along County Road 116 that will be turned into a natural habitat will cost $100,000 over a 10-year commitment. The cost includes field prep, seed, planting, and maintenance. The City’s cost is projected $9,000 over 10 years, primarily for the cost of maintenance, due to the grant program and involvement of other agencies. Commissioner Strehler asked what the level of staff involvement is within a maintenance program involving another agency. Public Works Director Mattson answered efforts will be completed by a combination of City staff and the other agencies. For example, other agencies may pay for the seed, and City staff will plant the seed. City Administrator Tobin added that when the City attempted to go out for a bid to continue using these fields for cropland factoring in the impact created by the change in taxes, the City received no bids. He explained this is why the City is looking for a long-term sustainable solution to maintain these areas that aligns with the City’s identity, visions, and values. Commissioner Strehler asked about what is required after planting is completed, such as the use of fertilizer or weed control. Public Works Director Mattson confirmed maintenance includes mowing and burning is required, particularly in the first year. Once the native species are established, they need less intervention and won’t need fertilizer. Commissioner Strehler asked how the plant species is determined. Public Works Director Mattson explained the other agencies will develop and present a plan based on the soil and site conditions, and then the City will approve. 6 Commissioner Anderson provided an example of an established habitat that requires minimal involvement in the spring to spray or burn plants that are not a part of the habitat plan, reseed where anything was burned, and then new seed is picked in the fall to create a new mix. Commissioner Strehler agreed these spaces can be beautiful when maintained correctly. Commissioner Friedrich stated concern about planting trees, such as Oak Savannah, in areas that will eventually be developed in 15 years. However, it may make more sense for areas that are not expected to be developed in 30 years. Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck explained that these areas are not in Phase 1 of the City Park remaster, and once Phase 1 is complete there are a number of other parks that needs to be constructed before the City Park will be revisited, so it is expected it will be several years before these fields are developed. Commissioner Erzberger stated a concern that grant programs may limit ability to later develop the area for park space if there is a requirement for permeance. City Administrator Tobin confirmed there are different grants and programs with some more flexible than others. Public Works Director Mattson agreed that they can filter out any programs that require areas to be a natural habitat in perpetuity and consider required timeframes. He explained some contracts have a longer timeframe but also have a buyout clause to provide flexibility should the City’s plans change. Commissioner Friedrich stated her opinion that a natural habitat makes sense for Field 1 with potentially a tree program for Field 3. Commissioner Erzberger agreed natural habitat for Field 1 may provide more flexibility with trees more ideal for Field 2 and 3. Commissioner Friedrich asked if these programs will consider what the area looked like historically. Public Works Director Mattson stated it likely depends on the grant and the size of the area. He summarized the Commission feedback that there is support in reviewing Field 1, 2, and 3 for available programs that do not have a perpetuity requirement, with a blend of seeds, grasses, and trees. c. See My Legacy/Park Enhancement Program Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck explained that the need for additional funding to support park projects is needed. In researching options, she found See My Legacy which would support the City’s Park Enhancement Program and volunteers for City events. She explained the draft Park Enhancement Program was included in the packet and the would be updated based on all feedback received since June for the December Parks and Trails Commission meeting, followed by going to City Council for a final decision. She explained that See My Legacy in an organization that offers different campaigns including a memorial program that will support the Park Enhancement Program, sponsorships and fundraisers for park projects, and volunteer events such as Night to Unite. The Memorial Program would be a centralized system to reasonably manage the City’s Park Enhancement Program. The service will allow for site furnishings, such as benches, to be mapped out for people to select when they donate. She added there is also the option to include QR codes on amenities that allows someone to scan a plaque of minimal characters to a webpage that provides the story behind the memorial. The QR codes are good for 10 years post contract with See My Legacy which fits the lifespan of the site furnishings. She explained a discounted rate of $1529 is proposed for the first year of the service to be paid out of the 2024 Recreation budget to start up in 2025. She anticipates this first year of use will be a trial and success of the platform will be evaluated at the end of 2025 to determine how the City move forwards. Commissioner Nybo asked if the plaque or memorial items will still say “in memory of” in addition to the QR code. Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck explained there are three different plaque options, one that is only the QR code called a “story tag”, a “story dedication” plaque which was noted as ideal for the anticipated furnishings, and then a larger “story board” which is not envisioned to be compatible with anticipated furnishings but would make sense for a structure. She added that furnishings are paid for by a single person whereas the fundraising/sponsorship campaign allows multiple people to contribute towards larger amenities, such as the splash pad. Commissioner Friedrich stated she didn’t see the benefit of the QR code within a park setting. City Administrator Tobin stated that the benefit being that there will be larger stories that people want to share to explain the significance of the memorial but won’t fit on a plaque. The QR code will take you to a landing page for those that are interested in understanding more. He agreed that older generations may not 7 be attracted by the QR codes, but younger generations do like to utilize these features to enhance their experience. It is expected the QR codes can be a tool to attract donations and increase engagement among new generations. Commissioner Schmidt agreed the QR code is a novel idea, but he wants to make sure the QR codes cannot be used as a scam. City Administrator Tobin stated one thing he likes about the proposal is that See My Legacy will manage the QR codes. Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck explained that the person who donates drafts the landing page for the QR code, but staff does have approval authority to avoid inappropriate postings. Commissioner Nybo asked for clarity that the first year is $1500 before going up to $2500 a year. Commissioner Anderson asked if there are other companies doing the same work, and if other cities in the area are using this system. Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck said she did look around for other options, but this one seemed to offer the most features in line with the City’s needs. City Administrator Tobin stated that in Shakopee there was a full-time employee that managed the memorial program, so he believes the use of this organization will set up the Park Enhancement Program for success without requiring additional staff. Motion: Made by Anderson, seconded by Nybo, to recommend approval of the contract for See My Legacy. Voting Aye: Anderson, Erzberger, Friedrich, Nybo, Schmidt, and Strehler. (Motion carried 6:0) 9. Reports/Information a. Planning Project Update – Information Only Commissioner Anderson asked for a status update on the Domino’s project. City Administrator Tobin confirmed the project is moving forward. He added the exterior refrigerator space at the Domino’s site will be wrapped in partnership with the City, which could potentially be a way to promote City Park. There will be future discussions and the wrap will be regularly replaced. b. Parks, Recreation, and Trails Update Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck noted items that she had been working on since the last Parks and Trails Commission meeting, including the City Park survey, the Special Event process, and organizing the Holiday Toy and Food Drive. She noted items that went to City Council recently included recognition of Ken Guenthner’s retirement from the watershed, the City Park Remaster update, and the Community Development Department budget brief. She also explained there are two vacancies representing the City as part of the watershed commission that the City is working to fill. 10. Subcommittee & Miscellaneous Reports a. Garden Club Report Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck confirmed the City obtained their nursery dealer stock certificate for 2025. b. Park Dedication Fund No discussion occurred. 11. Other Business/Announcements Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck and the Commission discussed changing the meeting on June 19, 2025, to Tuesday, June 17, 2025. 12. Adjournment Motion: Made by Nybo , seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 pm. Voting Aye: Anderson, Erzberger, Friedrich, Nybo, Schmidt, and Strehler. (Motion carried 6:0) Submitted by Jessica Christensen Buck, Recreation Supervisor STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7a. Commission Meeting December 19, 2024 Prepared By Jessica Christensen Buck Topic Park Enhancement Program (PEP) Action Required Direction Summary During the June 20, 2024, Parks and Trails Commission meeting, staff brought a draft of the Park Enhancement Program. Feedback received during the meeting was to include considerations towards: • Inclusion of maintenance/installation in the cost of enhancements • What upgrading existing amenities would entail • Inclusion of drinking fountains and fire tables as enhancement options • Inclusion of non-English language for plaques • Durable, natural-colored tones for enhancements Additionally, a request was brought to the November 21, 2024, Parks and Trails Commission meeting for the consideration of See My Legacy. See My Legacy is an engagement platform that can help with the City’s Park Enhancement Program and fundraising for larger amenities. Following recommendation from the Parks and Trails Commission, City Council approved the request to utilize See My Legacy for 2025 during the November 25, 2024, meeting. Attached is the Park Enhancement Program overview (7a1), with adjustments shown as tracked changes in red. Staff is looking to finalize the Park Enhancement Program, which would require City Council approval, followed by working with See My Legacy to implement the program. The areas staff sees as most beneficial to include are the benches, bike racks, and drinking fountains. With the City Park project, there will be determined locations for those enhancements within the project and could be included as donatable enhancements. Additional enhancements can be explored and added as appropriate locations are determined. The inclusion of drinking fountains as possible enhancement options is shown on attachment 7a2. Staff did not include fire tables as additional feedback from other departments is necessary to determine viability (Public Works, Police). Staff’s initial questions are regarding the ongoing propane costs, determining the most appropriate installation method (direct line vs. propane tank), and general maintenance/operation of the enhancement. These questions require more time to delve into, and should the Commission have continued interest, could be added later as an option without having to update the policy itself. Staff updated attachment 7a1. with the following changes: • Removal of the examples from the policy document Page 2 • Inclusion of non-English language for plaques, with note of translation required at time of submission. The reasoning for removal of the examples from the Park Enhancement Program overview document is to prevent repetitive updates to the policy. By providing an overview of the program, the updates to amenity pricing and options can be shown on See My Legacy, or a future centralized location. This would require less updates to the policy, when the updates would not change policy language, simply the pricing or enhancement options. Inclusion of non-English language allows for greater inclusion in the program, while having translation provided as part of the application. This will allow staff to confirm the intended message easier as these requests arise. Staff is looking for feedback from the Parks and Trails Commission on the following items: • Is there desire to include the following items in the cost of the donation: o Concrete pad/footings ($1,000-2,000 | $20-$30/sq. ft. | dependent on amenity) o Shipping costs ($400+ | dependent on amenity) o Plaque (See My Legacy QR plaques: $49, $89, $199) o Maintenance (staff and supply/equipment cost – would be incident specific) • Is there a portion of the donation that the City should be covering? The policy will need to be reviewed by the City Attorney and is intended to go for review following Parks and Trails Commission feedback. Financial/Budget See My Legacy was approved during the November 25, 2024, City Council meeting through Recreation Operating Supplies budget funds. This program could help to alleviate some future cost burden relating to park furnishings and other enhancements through donation. Recommendation Review the documents and enhancement examples, provide feedback to staff on preferences and updates to the program, and make a recommendation to Council regarding the policy implementation. Attachments 1. Park Enhancement Program (PEP) 2. Enhancement Examples and Costs Park Enhancement Program 1 Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines, standards, and procedures for the installation and care of donated park enhancements. These donations may include, but are not limited to, park benches, bicycle racks, picnic tables, drinking fountains, flags, and other types of park elements. The City desires to encourage donations while managing aesthetic impacts, mitigating on-going maintenance costs, and ensuring compatibility with the Park Standards and Comprehensive Plan. Objectives •Encourages a community culture that values preserving memories through park enhancements. •Facilitates park enhancement donation to heighten public enjoyment of the park system. •Ensures the long-term sustainability of the program by establishing guidelines for placement, maintenance, and upkeep of the park enhancement. Authorization The Parks and Trails Commission shall be responsible for recommending locations and plaque language to the City Council for final approval. The City Council may accept, reject, or request changes to the language of the location and/or plaque language. Guidelines General •All donations must be made in full and undergo the approval process before ordering and installing of the enhancement. •Due to cost and staff time limitations, the City may require multiple requests for enhancements and/or appropriate weather conditions before ordering and installation. Installation will occur within 1 year of approval by City Council. •Upon installation, enhancements become the property of the City of Corcoran. •Minnesota Statute requires all donations to be officially accepted by the City Council. Location •Location of enhancements will be determined through staff, Parks and Trails Commission, and City Council review. •Enhancements shall not detract from, or overpower, the scenic or architectural values of the existing environment. •To accept donation of a park element for a specific park facility, a park plan must exist showing the available locations for park elements. •Interested parties may submit location requests not shown, however, the City may limit the number of enhancements at a particular location. Plaques Plaque inscriptions will be limited to a predetermined character count and will be appropriately sized to the donated enhancement, if applicable. Additionally, plaques must be approved to ensure respectful messaging. Donors are welcome to include alternative languages beyond English, with translation of the message to be included with the submission. Example plaque language: “In memory of Sue Jones and their love of the outdoors” The following will not be considered: Formatted: Font: Italic 7a1. Park Enhancement Program 2 • Offensive language or profanity • Political or religious propaganda • Promotion of commercial products or services • Hate speech or discriminatory messages • Example of plaque language: “In memory of Firstname Lastname and their love of the parks” Maintenance and Responsibility • The lifecycle of these enhancements is considered to be 10 years, unless otherwise noted. • As to not impact resources available for maintenance of other facilities, there is a 10% maintenance donation, based on the value of the enhancement, to cover anticipated on- going maintenance during the life expectancy of the donation. • The City reserves the right to remove the donated item when it has exceeded its expected life cycle. • The City of Corcoran will be responsible for routine maintenance of the enhancements, including minor repairs. • The City of Corcoran accepts no liability for damage to donations from vandals, third parties, or acts of nature. • In the event of major damage, the enhancement becomes unusable, or the lifecycle of the enhancement has expired, the City will attempt to contact the donor, in writing, to discuss replacement options. The donor will have 30 days to respond regarding their interest in replacement options. Park Enhancement Options Bench MORE INFO TO COME – EXAMPLE AND PRICING To include cost of concrete pad & installation Bike Rack MORE INFO TO COME – EXAMPLE AND PRICING To include cost of concrete pad & installation Waste Receptacles MORE INFO TO COME – EXAMPLE AND PRICING Bricks MORE INFO TO COME – EXAMPLES AND PRICING Process 1. Submission of FormRequest The donor submits a completed Park Enhancement Donation Form to Corcoran Parks and Recreationrequest. 2. Staff Review of Submission Park Enhancement Program 3 Staff will review the application for completion, location, and plaque language. Staff will notify the donor within 15 business days regarding the agenda item being included at an upcoming Parks and Trails Commission meeting. 3. Parks and Trails Commission Review The Parks and Trails Commission will review the location(s) and plaque language, then make a recommendation on the proposed donation to the Corcoran City Council. 4. City Council Review City Council will make the final decision using input and recommendation from staff and the Parks and Trails Commission. Cost:4': $879 | 6': $1,109 | 8': $1,543 Cost:6': $636 | 8': $928 Length:4', 6', 8'Length:6', 8' Color options:Cedar, Grey, Brown Color optio Cedar, Grey, Brown Arm rest?Optional Arm rest?No Material: Recycled plastic Material: Recycled plastic Website: Website: https://kaypark.com/product/contour-bench-with-choice- of-recycled-plastic-planks-powder-coated-frame/ https://kaypark.com/product/stationary-2-plank- park-bench-recycled-plastic/ 7a2.Benches Cost:4': $948 | $1,178 | $1,612 Cost:4': $612, 6': $880 Length:4', 6', 8'Length:4', 6' Color options:Cedar, Grey, Brown Color optio Cedar, Grey, Brown, Green Arm rest?Option Arm rest?No Material: Recycled plastic Material: Recycled plastic Website: Website: https://kaypark.com/product/contour-bench-with-choice- of-recycled-plastic-planks-powder-coated-frame/ https://kaypark.com/product/brooklyn-park- bench-with-back-recycled-plastic-slats/ Benches Cost:$758 Length:6' Color optio Tan Arm rest?No Material: Recycled plastic Website: https://www.bciburke.com/products/product/6-recycled-plastic-bench Benches Drinking Fountains Drinking Fountains 3/7/24, 10:46 AM 5'4" Contemporary Wave Style Steel Bike Rack https://www.bciburke.com/products/product/54-contemporary-bike-rack 1/4 HOME : PRODUCTS : SPORT & RECREATION : SITE AMENITIES : BIKE RACKS : 5'4"CONTEMPORARY BIKE RACK IMAGES DOWNLOADS 5'4" Contemporary Bike Rack TO DOWNLOAD A DOCUMENT, CLICK LINK BELOW Additional content of this tab is protected and only visible to authorized users. Please login to view the contents of this tab. LOGIN Key Features: Encourage children to ride their bikes to the playground by offering them a safe, easy place to store their bikes while they play. You'll not only be promoting physical fitness, you'll also be adding to the value and usefulness of your park or school playground. Learn More Capacity: 0 Fall Height: 0" Quoted Cost: $733 Capacity: 12 Bike Racks 3/7/24, 10:47 AM 7'4" Contemporary Wave Style Steel Bike Rack https://www.bciburke.com/products/product/74-contemporary-bike-rack 1/4 HOME : PRODUCTS : SPORT & RECREATION : SITE AMENITIES : BIKE RACKS : 7'4"CONTEMPORARY BIKE RACK IMAGES DOWNLOADS 7'4" Contemporary Bike Rack TO DOWNLOAD A DOCUMENT, CLICK LINK BELOW Additional content of this tab is protected and only visible to authorized users. Please login to view the contents of this tab. LOGIN Key Features: Encourage children to ride their bikes to the playground by offering them a safe, easy place to store their bikes while they play. You'll not only be promoting physical fitness, you'll also be adding to the value and usefulness of your park or school playground. Learn More Capacity: 0 Fall Height: 0" Quoted Cost: $675 Capacity: 16 Bike Racks 3/7/24, 10:47 AM 10ft Double Sided Heavy Duty Grid Bike Rack https://www.bciburke.com/products/product/10-double-face-extra-heavy-duty-bike-rack 1/4 HOME : PRODUCTS : SPORT & RECREATION : SITE AMENITIES : BIKE RACKS : 10' DOUBLEFACE EXTRA HEAVY DUTY BIKE RACK IMAGES DOWNLOADS 10' Double Face Extra Heavy Duty Bike Rack TO DOWNLOAD A DOCUMENT, CLICK LINK BELOW Additional content of this tab is protected and only visible to authorized users. Please login to view the contents of this tab. LOGIN Key Features: Encourage children to ride their bikes to the playground by offering them a safe, easy place to store their bikes while they play. You'll not only be promoting physical fitness, you'll also be adding to the value and usefulness of your park or school playground. Learn More Capacity: 0 Fall Height: 0" Quoted Cost: $882 Capacity: 20 Bike Racks 3/7/24, 10:48 AM 10ft Single Sided Heavy Duty Grid Bike Rack https://www.bciburke.com/products/product/10-single-face-extra-heavy-duty-bike-rack 1/5 HOME : PRODUCTS : SPORT & RECREATION : SITE AMENITIES : BIKE RACKS : 10' SINGLEFACE EXTRA HEAVY DUTY BIKE RACK IMAGES DOWNLOADS 10' Single Face Extra Heavy Duty Bike Rack TO DOWNLOAD A DOCUMENT, CLICK LINK BELOW Additional content of this tab is protected and only visible to authorized users. Please login to view the contents of this tab. LOGIN Key Features: Encourage children to ride their bikes to the playground by offering them a safe, easy place to store their bikes while they play. You'll not only be promoting physical fitness, you'll also be adding to the value and usefulness of your park or school playground. Approximate List Price*: $788 Capacity: 0 Fall Height: 0" Quoted Cost: $788 Capacity: 10 Bike Racks 3/7/24, 10:23 AM Arches Bike Rack, Triple - Landscape Structures https://www.playlsi.com/en/commercial-playground-equipment/playground-components/arches-bike-rack---triple/2/2  Also of Interest: Loop Rack Bike Racks Leaf Bike Rack Model Release Form Login Sitemap Careers/Jobs Privacy Virtual Catalogs Contact Us ©2024 Landscape Structures Inc. All Rights Reserved. Color and Materials Related Playground Components ProShield® Finish  View Arches Bike Rack - Single Age Ranges:All Ages Price Range (USD): $0K-$5K Loo Age Pric (US Bike Racks 3/7/24, 10:48 AM Pivot Bike Rack https://www.bciburke.com/products/product/pivot-bike-rack 1/4 HOME : PRODUCTS : SPORT & RECREATION : SITE AMENITIES : BIKE RACKS : PIVOT BIKERACK IMAGES DOWNLOADS Pivot Bike Rack TO DOWNLOAD A DOCUMENT, CLICK LINK BELOW pivot-bike-rack-580-1404 DWG Additional content of this tab is protected and only visible to authorized users. Please login to view the contents of this tab. LOGIN Riding bicycles is a great way to exercise, commute and have fun individually, with friends or as a family. Having a place to store your bike at a park, recreation area, fitness space or even a coffee shop is important and keeps bikes safe while their riders enjoy all the community has to offer. Pivot has clean design lines and space for more than one bike so everyone has a spot! Learn More Quoted Cost: $524 Capacity: 9 Image on the left shows TWO pivot bike racks. Bike Racks 3/7/24, 10:23 AM Arches Bike Rack, Triple - Landscape Structures https://www.playlsi.com/en/commercial-playground-equipment/playground-components/arches-bike-rack---triple/1/2 Home >Products >Playground Components >Arches Bike Rack - Triple Arches Bike Rack - Triple Model #185653 Product Overview and Features Product Details  Product Categories Freestanding Play Shipping Weight 71 lbs Dimensions Height: Small 27-3/16" (0,04 m); Large 35-3/16" (0,06 m) Design/CAD Files for this Freestanding Play Element Download Design 3679 - 2D DWG Download Design 3679 - 2D PDF Download Design 3679 - 3D PDF Price Range (USD) $0K-$5K *Prices vary. For international and exact pricing, contact your local playground consultant. Contact Your Consultant Overview The Arches Bike Racks are the ideal complements to our Evos® and Weevos® playsystems and other playgrounds with modern styling. The Arches Bike Rack is available as a Triple configuration (shown here) or as single arches (Arches Bike Rack–Single) to configure any way you want. Features Durable, ProShield®-finished, galvanized steel, overlapping arches Set configuration of three arches; 2 small arches and 1 large arch Visit a Playground Contact  search  close Save Quoted Cost: $602-$918 Capacity: 4+ (dependent on type of configuration) Bike Racks 3/7/24, 10:23 AM Loop Rack - Curved Pipe for Bike, Strollers, Wheelchairs https://www.playlsi.com/en/commercial-playground-equipment/playground-components/loop-rack/1/4 Home >Products >Playground Components >Loop Rack Loop Rack Model #100102 Product Details  Product Categories Freestanding Play Shipping Weight 83 lbs Dimensions Actual Size: 64" long x 2.5" wide (1,63 m x 0,06 m) Design/CAD Files for this Freestanding Play Element Download Design 6576 - 2D DWG Download Design 6576 - 2D PDF Download Design 6576 - 3D PDF Download Design 7937 - 2D DWG Download Design 7937 - 2D PDF Download Design 7937 - 3D PDF Price Range (USD) $0K-$5K *Prices vary. For international and exact pricing, contact your local playground consultant. Contact Your Consultant Visit a Playground Contact  search  close Quoted Cost: $408-$638 Capacity: 7 Bike Racks 3/7/24, 10:23 AM Loop Rack - Curved Pipe for Bike, Strollers, Wheelchairs https://www.playlsi.com/en/commercial-playground-equipment/playground-components/loop-rack/2/4 Product Overview and Features Overview The Loop Rack is a traditional, heavy-duty bike rack that is perfect for any park or playground. Features 2-3/8" O.D. schedule-40 pipe with 19" buried footings or 2" surface mount for exceptional durability 5' 4"-long rack holds seven bikes Available with TenderTuff™-coating to prevent scratches on bikes, or with any ProShield® color Bike Racks BIKE RACKSBIKE RACKS 90 www.pilotrock.com · 1-800-762-5002 Model BR-6SS 95 in. long, single side parking to hold up to 6 bikes. •The Safety Bicycle Rack is designed with gently curved arches. Thebase angles face down to eliminate any vertical edges. •With a 2-1/4" inside stall width this rack will accommodate bikes in a widevariety of sizes. Models are available in single-side (to fit adjacent to walls)and double-side styles (to hold bikes on both sides). Both styles can beganged together on the ends to supply the needed amount of parking.Bikes are parked on 16" centers per side. • Construction: welded, fully assembled hoops of 1/2” diameter steel bar,1/8” x 1-1/4” x 1-1/4” formed steel base angles, and hot dip galvanizedfinish for maximum protection from weather and bikes. Zinc platedfasteners included. •All assembly fasteners are pointed towards the ground with nutsconcealed from view inside base angle to deter theft. Shippedunassembled. •Optional: Model BR-4HSA set of (4) 3/8” x 1-7/8” hex sleeve anchorsto secure bike rack to concrete surface. MODEL NO.NO. OF BIKES SIDES OPEN L X W X H (INCHES)ANCHORS BR-6DS 6 DOUBLE 48 x 20-1/4 x 12 BR-4HSASee Page 126. BR-6SS 6 SINGLE 95 x 20-1/4 x 12 BR-12DS 12 DOUBLE 95 x 20-1/4 x 12 SAFETY BICYCLE RACK Single Sided Bike Rack Double Sided Bike Rack Model BR-12DS 95 in. long, double side parking to hold up to 12 bikes. Quoted Cost: $269-$436 | Capacity: 6-12 ooo BIKE RACKSBIKE RACKS 92 www.pilotrock.com · 1-800-762-5002 Model BR205SS/G single sided hot dip galvanized bike rack with “D” style end frames. Holds five bicycles. VERTICAL BIKE RACK •Tall vertical stalls hold the front or back bike tire secure. •The end frames and cross tube structures are fabricated using 1.66" OD x 10 ga. wall steel tube; the vertical stall bars are 5/8" OD steel bar (not hollow tube). All welded component fabrication. Stall structure bolts to end frames so racks ship flat to reduce freight and handling costs. • Using the same stall structure, with interchangeable end frames, a variety of bike racks can be built – offering you choices of design and parking capacity. • Single-sided racks will hold from 5 to 10 bikes. Double-sided racks will park from 10 to 20 bikes. See chart below. •Double the parking capacity of a basic bike rack by adding an identical set of stalls. A matching center frame joins the stall sections together. • Choose a finish. All rack designs are available with a powder coated paint finish in your choice of colors. See Page 52. A hot dip galvanized finish is also available. See chart below. •These versatile bike racks will hold all types of bikes and most locking devices can be used. •Optional: Order a set of 4 or 6 heavy-duty screw anchors to secure your bike rack to a concrete surface. See chart below. •Optional: Custom end panels with laser cut signage can provide identity for your agency, school or business. End Frame Style Model No.No. of Bikes Sides Open Available Finish*Profile & No. of Sections L x W x H (in inches) Optional H.D. Anchor Kit for ConcreteHot Dip Galv. Powder Coat ”D” BR205SS/♦5 Single Side Yes (/G)Yes Available with powder coat finish. See Page 52 for color choices (1) 76 x 23 x 33 #ANC2-4 (4) 3/8" x 5" BR210SS/♦10 Single Side Yes (/G)(2)150 x 23 x 33 #ANC2-4 (4) 3/8" x 5" ”Bell” BR210DS/♦10 Double Side Yes (/G)(1) 76 x 46 x 33 #ANC2-4 (4) 3/8" x 5" BR220DS/♦20 Double Side Yes (/G)(2) 150 x 46 x 33 #ANC2-6 (6) 3/8" x 5" *Replace (♦) in Model number with finish designation, e.g. BR205SS/G. See Page 52 for powder coat colors. Model BR220DS/CN double sided bike rack with “Bell” style end frames. Green powder coat finish. Showing extension which doubles the parking capacity. Holds twenty bikes. Model BR210DS/G double sided hot dip galvanized bike rack with “Bell” style end frames. Holds ten bicycles. Ask about custom signage for your BR210 or BR220 bike rack. Quoted cost: $538-749 | Capacity: 5-20 (dependent on size) Estimated cost: $255 BIKE RACKSBIKE RACKS 95customerservice@rjthomas.com · FAX: 712-225-5796www.pilotrock.com · 1-800-762-5002 SADDLEBACK BIKE RACK • The Saddleback Bike Rack incorporates a graceful, continuous loop design. It will accommodate all types of bikes and all popular lockingdevices. • The Saddleback Rack is formed using heavy gauge 2-3/8" OD Schl. 40steel pipe, and offers a hot dip galvanized finish for maximum protection from weather and bikes. • This rack can mount a bicycle at each end, plus a bike in each ascending or descending loop. Models are available to park from 3 to 13 bikes.Model SRE has a longer leg for embedment into concrete footings.Model SRP is surface mounted with bolt down base plates (3/8" dia. anchor bolts not included). Model SRP/G-5 bike rack, surface mount installation with base plate, includes cover caps, will park up to 5 bikes. # of Bikes 3 5 7 9 11 13 Length (nom.)14" 38"62"86"110"134" Embedded Models SRE/G-3 SRE/G-5 SRE/G-7 SRE/G-9 SRE/G-11 SRE/G-13 Base Plate Models SRP/G-3 SRP/G-5 SRP/G-7 SRP/G-9 SRP/G-11 SRP/G-13 *Note: Saddleback Bicycle Racks feature a nominal 12" center to center between loops. Listed lengths are nominal and may vary due to bending tolerances. 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Two Installation Choices Model SRP racks are surface mounted by means of a bolt down base plate for use with two 3/8" anchor bolts (bolts not included). 2-part aluminum cover caps are included. Model SRE racks have extended legs for embedding into concrete footings. Optional: 2-part aluminum cover caps are available for each leg. Add /C to model number. NOTE: COVER CAPS CAN BE POWDER COATED TO MATCH BIKE RACK FINISH. Model SRE/G-7 bike rack, embedded installation, will park up to 7 bikes. •2-part aluminum cover caps are includedwith SRP racks. See chart below. •Optional: Powder coat finish. See Page 52. •Optional: Model ANC3-4 set of (4) 3/8" dia. x 3" heavy duty screw anchorsfor concrete surface. Model SRP/G-13 requires anchor kit ANC3-6. See Page 126. Quoted Cost: $431-$892 | 3-13 Polar Engraving Stone and Steel Design That’s My Brick Cost:$19.50 $29.44 $25 (min. 5) Size 4" x 8"4" x 8"4" x 8" Material Concrete or Clay Clay Character limit:14 characters/line Website: https://polarengraving.com/engraved- bricks/ https://stoneandsteeldesign.com/services/ fundraising/ https://www.thatsmybrick.com/pages/lpg/i ndex.html?v2=postcard&v1=pastor Bricks 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov MEMO Meeting Date: December 19, 2024 To: Parks and Trails Commission From: Jessica Christensen Buck, Recreation Supervisor Re: City Park Survey Results ______________________________________________________________________ Community feedback was requested on proposed amenities, features, and themes for park development. The survey received 197 responses, but it should be noted that not all questions were required to be answered by the respondent to submit their feedback. This information reflects the priorities and preferences expressed by survey participants and provides guidance for planning and design efforts. The primary amenities that received the most votes were the playground and splashpad. Preferences for the playground included slides and climbing aspects to be incorporated. Most respondents preferred individual swings, tall embankment slides, and hillside climbing loops as part of the playground. Additionally, including shade trees for shade integration was preferred. The splashpad responses reflected a strong desire for a nature theme, with additional preference towards a combination of above and below-ground level sprayers. Alternate amenity preference was towards the detached shelter and bituminous trails. Similarly, there was strong preference towards paved pathways with accessible slopes. Additional information is included below, reflecting more specifics with statistics from the survey. Amenity Prioritization Primary Amenities (Determined by combining the top three preferences for each amenity): 1. Playground (175 top three rankings) 2. Splashpad (151 top three rankings) 3. Park Building (116 top three rankings) 7b. 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov 4. Pickleball (94 top three rankings) 5. Parking Lot (61 top three rankings) Alternate Amenities (Determined by combining the top three preferences for each amenity): 1. Detached Shelter (162 top three rankings) 2. Bituminous Trails (138 top three rankings) 3. 3rd Playground Container (124 top three rankings) 4. Pickleball Plaza (114 top three rankings) 5. Planting Beds (51 top three rankings) Feedback on Vegetation and Shade • Preferred Vegetation Types: o Shade trees (141 votes) o Colorful shrubs and perennials (121 votes) o Ornamental flowering trees (111 votes) o Native plantings and mowed turf (107 votes) o Prairie restoration (82 votes) Splashpad Design • Theme Preferences: o Most liked: Nature (126 strongly like) o Additional Suggestions: Dinosaur, Minnesota heritage, floral themes, and Corcoran’s farming roots. • Sprayer Preferences: o Strong preference for both above and ground-level sprayers (154 votes). Playground Features • Top Prioritized Equipment (Determined by combining the top three preferences for each amenity): 1. Slides (165 top three rankings) 2. Climbers (132 top three rankings) 3. Zipline (119 top three rankings) 4. Bridges (117 top three rankings) 5. Spinning Amenities (55 top three rankings) • Accessible/Inclusive Features: o Strong preference for paved pathways with accessible slopes, accessible ramps/bridges, and accessible swings. • Swing Options: o Most preferred: Individual swings. o All other options listed were within 14 votes of each other. • Hillside Features: o Most liked: Tall embankment slides and hillside climbing loops. • Shade Integration Preferences: o Shade trees near seating areas (145 votes) 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov o Fabric shade sails (118 votes) o Small shelters or pavilions (104 votes) Additional Desired Amenities Key requests include: • Dog Park/Off-leash Area • Pickleball Facilities • Trail Connections (e.g., Rush Creek and perimeter walking trails) • Restrooms and Drinking Fountains • Seating and Picnic Areas Demographics Residency: • Corcoran: 179 • Hennepin County: 48 • Bordering City: 12 90% of the respondents reported living in Corcoran. Size of the household: • Adult(s) only: 68 • Adult(s), 1 child: 36 • Adult(s), 2-4 children: 76 • Adult(s), 4+ children: 10 • Prefer not to answer: 7 Age: • >18: 3 • 18-24: 4 • 25-34: 40 • 35-44: 82 • 45-54: 22 • 55-64: 17 • 65+ years old: 21 • Prefer not to answer: 8 Attachments None STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7c. Commission Meeting December 19, 2024 Prepared By Jessica Christensen Buck Topic City Park 60% Design Review Action Required Direction Summary Following the latest updates in the design development phase, staff are presenting the draft 60% design of City Park. Staff seeks to gather feedback on key elements, including playground equipment, splash pad design, and site layout. Below are updates based on the 60% design draft: 1. Playground: o Three design options provided by vendors, all aligned with a farm/agriculture theme. o Key features include:  Large tower connected to the hillside.  ADA-compliant swing bays.  Distinct play areas for ages 2-5 and 5-12. o Feedback is sought on preferred designs and potential zipline inclusion (alternate). 2. Splash Pad: o Two design options focus on integrating ground-level and above-ground features. o Features that allow future updates and potential lighting integration. 3. Integration of Winter Activities: o Activatable areas for winter activities such as cross-country skiing, sledding, and skating (currently exists). o 4-season building to support year-round use. 4. Landscape and Stormwater Management: o Incorporation of native vegetation and pollinator-friendly plants. o Stormwater solutions integrated with trails and parking areas. Key takeaways from community feedback include: • Prioritization of playgrounds, splash pads, and pickleball courts. • Emphasis on safety and accessibility for all ages and abilities. • Desire for designs that reflect Minnesota heritage/local identity. Next Steps • Parks and Trails Commission feedback will guide final revisions to the 60% design. • Final presentation to the City Council on January 23, 2025. • Proceed with design development and construction documentation. Page 2 Staff requests feedback on the following: • Playground and splash pad design preferences. • Site layout and alternate elements. Financial/Budget Design development was approved during the October 24, 2024, City Council meeting utilizing Park Dedication Funds. Recommendation Staff recommend a motion to approve the draft 60% design and direct staff to proceed with final design development. Attachments 1. City Park 60% Design – Presentation CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK PLANNING & DESIGN DRAFT 60% DESIGN REVIEW PARKS AND TRAILS COMMISSION MEETING DEC. 19, 2024 2 DESIGN PROCESS Site Analysis Project Programming Concept Planning Preferred Concept Schematic Design 30% Design Set Design Development Construction Documentation Bidding & Construction Project opening 60% Design Set 100% Design Set Dec ‘23-Jan ‘24 Jan-Feb ‘24 Mar-May ‘24 Jun-Jul ‘24 Jul-Sept ‘24 Oct ‘24 - Feb ‘25 Jan-Mar ‘25 Apr-Oct ‘25 Fall/Winter ‘25-’26 WET WET WE T WET WETWETWET WE T WE T WE T WET WET WET WETWET WET WE T WET WE T WE T WETWETWE T WE T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET WE T WE T WET WET WET WE TWET W E T WET WET 0 SCALE: 1" = 300'-0" 600'300'150' NORTH Existing Balleld Meister Field Lions Field Hockey Rink Small Hockey Pickleball Courts Basketball Courts Warming House/ Maintenance Building 4,000 SF 18 2,000 SF Future Expansion Overow Parking 54 52 28 28 42 42 13 153 Building/ Pavilion7,500 SF Existing Shelter Tennis Courts Free Skate T-Ball Field T-Ball Field T-Ball Field T-Ball Field Playground Open Green Space (U10 Soccer Fields) New Parking Lot New Parking Lot Parking Lot Splash Pad Existing BalleldSnyder Field Existing Balleld Regional Trailhead Regional Trail Connection Relocated CR 50 Access Point Regional Trail Connection Regional Trail Corcoran City Park: Concept A DRAFT 03.15.2024 180’ 12 0 ’ 180’ 12 0 ’ 180’ 12 0 ’ 180’ 12 0 ’ 6 Ballelds 4 T-Ball Fields 4 U10 Soccer Fields 0 Full Size Soccer Field 277 Parking Stalls Amphitheater New Trunk Sewer Connection CR 50 CR 10 Existing Sewer/ Water Lines Future Ballelds/ Multi-use Fields Future Ballelds/ Multi-use Fields 3 DESIGN PROCESS Site Analysis Preferred Concept Schematic Design Design Development Programming Concept Planning 4 PROJECT SCHEDULE UPDATE • December 19, 2024, PTC Meeting • Draft 60% Design Review • January 23, 2025, CC Meeting • Final 60% Design Review 5 PURPOSE OF THE MEETING • Seeking input from the Parks and Trails Commission on... • Playground equipment • Splash pad • Draft 60% Design »Base bid and alternate design 6 ENGAGEMENT UPDATE • Top Priorities for Park Amenities • Splash pad and playground are the most desired features. • Strong interest in pickleball courts, shaded seating, and accessible pathways. • Design and Landscape Preferences • Emphasis on integrating native vegetation and shade trees. • Desire for pollinator-friendly and low-water-use plantings. • Playground and Splash Pad Insights • Preferences for slides, embankment features, and sensory-inclusive play areas. • Strong support for nature-themed splash pad with both ground-level and above-ground sprayers. • Additional Desired Features - potential later phase or integration in other parks • Off-leash dog park, trail connections, and seating options. • Restrooms, concessions, and shaded gathering spaces. 7 ENGAGEMENT UPDATE • Connectivity and Safety • Improved walking and biking paths, safe crossings to surrounding neighborhoods. • Focus on accessible design for all ages and abilities. • Community Vision • Incorporate Minnesota heritage and local identity into park themes. • Build with sustainability and future expansion in mind. • Demographics of Respondents • Majority are families with children, aged 25-44, residing in Corcoran. 8 SITE PLAN C R - 1 0 CR-50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 16 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 15 12 14 102 2 2 C R - 1 0 Create level field space for multi-purpose recreation including soccer and cricket Stormwater Pave parking lot (+/-260 spaces) Youth ballfield Destination playground Splash pad Patio and shelter Park building Overflow parking/future paved parking (+/- 45 spaces) Pickleball courts Gravel parking Trailhead with paved parking Pedestrian Crossing Amphitheater Regional trail Tennis Courts Park equipment storage buildings LEGEND Alternates Future Phase 9 PAVING AND TRAILS 10’ TRPD Regional Trail w/ 2’ Shoulder Existing Crushed Path, to remain Boardwalk 8’ Asphalt Trail Concrete Pickleball Plaza Connect to Existing Path Reuse Existing Bridge Crossing Connect to Rush Creek Reserve Development LEGEND Proposed Asphalt Proposed Concrete Proposed Regional Trail Boardwalk ADA Route C R - 1 0 CR-50 10 TREES AND LANDSCAPE LEGEND Existing Trees, to remain Existing Trees, to remove Proposed Deciduous Trees Proposed Coniferous Trees Landscape Area C R - 1 0 CR-50 11 TREES AND LANDSCAPE CR-50 LEGEND Existing Trees, to remain Existing Trees, to remove Proposed Deciduous Trees Proposed Coniferous Trees Landscape Area Proposed Deciduous Trees River Birch Betula nigra White Spruce Picea glauca Type A: Low-maintenance Planting Beds Type B: Grass Heavy Prairie Type C: Natural Pollinator Prairie Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor Eastern Redcedar Juniperus virginiana Red Maple Acer rubrum Black Hills Spruce Picea glauca var. densata Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Scotch Pine Pinus sylvestris American Elm Ulmus americana Norway Spruce Picea abies Proposed Coniferous Trees Landscape Area 12 STORMWATER C R - 1 0 CR-50 29,707.35 SF 5,245.43 SF 8.675.23 SF 13 WINTER ACTIVITY USE Cross-Country Skiing Winter Walking Snow Play Snowshoeing Sledding Hill 4-Season Building Ice Hockey Rink Leisure Skating Rink C R - 1 0 CR-50 14 LIGHTING C R - 1 0 CR-50 LEGEND Pedestrian Scale Path/Area Lights Bollard Walkway Lights Parking Lot Lights 15 LIGHTING CR-50 LEGEND Pedestrian Scale Path/Area Lights Bollard Walkway Lights Parking Lot Lights Bollard/Walkway Lighting Parking lot lights will be standard - provided by WHCEA Pedestrian Scale Path/ Area Lights Model: OutlineManufacturer: Landscape FormsApproximate Cost (w/o ship. + tax): $1,875 Post: BOL 14’ Wood Pole Luminaire: Lumenpulse Allegra Fixture and Arm Manufacturer: Structura (post); Lumenpulse (luminaire) Approximate Cost (w/o ship. + tax): $4,400 (post) + $2,500 (luminaire) Notes: Agrarian Style; LED; Dark Sky compliant; Good for edge conditions, open air spaces, along trails, and in parks • Goal • Provide security lighting for parking lot • Alternate: ped lighting at playground areas • Lighting design is still in progress • Preliminary examples below CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 12/09/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 12/09/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 12/09/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 12/09/2024 16 BUILDING - OPTION 1 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 12/09/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 12/09/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 12/09/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 12/09/2024 17 BUILDING - OPTION 2 18 BUILDING PROGRAM / FLOOR PLAN 19 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 20 PLAYGROUND • Playground Direction • 3 options provided by 3 different vendors »All were given the same budget and general site layout • Vendors were instructed to provide »Overall design to be farm/agriculture theme – Twin Silos Park to be main precedent for design direction »(1) large and (1) small embankment slide »(1) large tower to connect into hillside with custom features and bridge »(1) custom tractor in the 2-5yr area »Multiple swing bays ADA bucket swing and belt swings • Note: The colors shown on the following slides are changeable Playground (Ages 5-12) Playground (Ages 2-5) Park Building Drop-off Splash Pad Equipment Building Splash Pad Zip Line Area (Alternate) Equipment ManufacturerSales RepresentativeCommunity Park Corcoran, MN 21 PLAYGROUND - OPTION A ZIP LINE (ALTERNATE) Equipment ManufacturerSales RepresentativeCommunity Park Corcoran, MN 22 PLAYGROUND - OPTION A Equipment ManufacturerSales RepresentativeCommunity Park Corcoran, MN 23 PLAYGROUND - OPTION A ZIP LINE (ALTERNATE) Equipment ManufacturerSales RepresentativeCommunity Park Corcoran, MN 24 PLAYGROUND - OPTION A Equipment ManufacturerSales RepresentativeCommunity Park Corcoran, MN 25 PLAYGROUND - OPTION A 26 PLAYGROUND - OPTION B ZIP LINE (ALTERNATE) 27 PLAYGROUND - OPTION B 28 PLAYGROUND - OPTION B 29 PLAYGROUND - OPTION B 30 PLAYGROUND - OPTION B 31 PLAYGROUND - OPTION C 32 PLAYGROUND - OPTION C 33 PLAYGROUND - OPTION C 34 PLAYGROUND - OPTION C 35 PLAYGROUND - OPTION C 36 SPLASH PAD • Splash Pad Direction • 2 options provided by 2 different vendors »All were given the same budget and general site layout • Vendors were instructed to provide »Overall design to be farm/agriculture theme »Create clear areas of younger vs older kids »Combination of above ground features and in-ground jets »Possibility to incorporate some integrated lighting if desired »Allow for possible future change outs of in-ground to above ground features. Park Building Drop-off Splash Pad Equipment Building Splash Pad Playground (Ages 5-12) Playground (Ages 2-5) Zip Line Area (Alternate) ©2024 Aquatix by Landscape Structures. All Rights Reserved | aquatix.playlsi.com Community Park Splash Pad Design# 1189239-01-03 09/06/24 37 SPLASH PAD - OPTION A ©2024 Aquatix by Landscape Structures. All Rights Reserved | aquatix.playlsi.com Community Park Splash Pad Design# 1189239-01-03 09/06/24 38 SPLASH PAD - OPTION A 39 SPLASH PAD - OPTION B *No colored paving or wall seating will be included 40 SPLASH PAD - OPTION B *No colored paving or wall seating will be included Equipment ManufacturerSales RepresentativeCommunity Park Corcoran, MN 41 PLAYGROUND DISCUSSION... Option A Option B Option C ©2024 Aquatix by Landscape Structures. All Rights Reserved | aquatix.playlsi.com Community Park Splash Pad Design# 1189239-01-03 09/06/24 42 SPLASH PAD DISCUSSION... Option A Option B 43 VENDOR CONSIDERATIONS • Background • All vendors were given the same budget and general site layout • Vendors were instructed to provide: • Prompt coordination and design iterations • Farm-themed equipment within a budget • Selection considerations: • Does the design meet the goals? • Overall equipment and play value based on the budget • Responsiveness and level of service • Quality of deliverables and presentation graphics that we received Park Building Drop-off Zip Line Area (Alternate) Splash Pad Equipment Building Splash Pad Playground (Ages 5-12) Playground (Ages 2-5) 44 REGIONAL TRAIL • Plan to install boardwalk and rough grading in Phase 1 • Phase 2 will include placing the trail in 2026 10’ TRPD Regional Trail w/ 2’ Shoulder Boardwalk Reuse Existing Bridge Crossing Connect to Rush Creek Reserve Development C R - 1 0 CR-50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 16 15 14 13 12 11 16 17 17 15 14 13 12 111 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 102 2 2 C R - 1 0 Create level field space for multi-purpose recreation including soccer and cricket Stormwater Pave parking lot (+/-260 spaces) Youth ballfield Destination playground Splash pad Patio and shelter Park building Overflow parking/future paved parking (+/- 45 spaces) Pickleball courts Gravel parking Trailhead with paved parking Pedestrian Crossing Amphitheater Regional trail Tennis Courts Park equipment storage buildings LEGEND 45 PHASE 2 AMENITIES Phase 2 Amenities 46 ALTERNATE ITEMS C R - 1 0 CR-50 C R - 1 0 Paved trails through cloverleaf Playground 3rd container (zip-line) 6 Pickleball Courts Open air shelter behind park building Expanded storage at splashpad mech. Accessible paved trail down to t-ball fields 47 COST ESTIMATE Phase 1 City Park Improvements Cost Estimate Removals, Grading, Site Prep $510,000 Parking Lot paving and curb $690,000 Sanitary and Water Utilities $263,000 Stormwater Utilities $365,000 Park Building $3,000,000 Site Lighting and Electrical $75,000 Playground $850,000 Splashpad $760,000 Paved Plazas and Trails $280,000 Furnishings: picnic tables, benches, bike racks, trash/recycling receptacles, signage $87,000 Landscaping, trees, and boulders $197,000 SE ballfield restoration $20,000 Add turn lane on CR 50 at park entrance $450,000 Subtotal base bid $7,547,000 Mobilization & Project Contingency (20%)$1,509,400 Total Base Bid Estimate $9,056,400 Alternates Pickleball courts, concrete plaza, and shade $450,000 Paved Trails through cloverleaf $70,000 Playground - 3rd container $65,000 Open air shelter behind building $220,000 Accessible trail to t-ball fields $40,000 Expanded storage at splashpad mechanical $150,000 Total Alternates $995,000 TRPD Regional Trail - separate funding Trail grading, paving, and boardwalk $800,000 48 PROJECT DELIVERY APPROACH • Two bid packages bid in April/May • Bid package #1 - Site Work • Bid package #2 - Building 49 NEXT STEPS... • Present Final 60% Design and site recommendations to CC on Jan. 23rd 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov MEMO Meeting Date: December 19, 2024 To: Parks and Trails Commission From: Jessica Christensen Buck, Recreation Supervisor Re: DRAFT 2024 Annual Report and 2025 Priorities ______________________________________________________________________ Summary December 19, 2024, marks the final Parks and Trails Commission meeting of the year. Staff looked back at the progress the Commission made this past year and opens discussion to the priorities for 2025. The following are some of the activities completed in 2024: • Appointed Chairperson Christenson and Vice-Chairperson Friedrich for 2024. • Received regular Parks and Trails Commission meeting minutes, planning project updates, Recreation Supervisor/Program Coordinator updates, City Council updates, and Garden Club updates. • Attended the City Council meetings as liaisons from the Commission. • Coordinated the annual tree giveaway. • Reviewed a preliminary plat for Woodland Hills. • Received updates and provided feedback on renditions of the City Park remaster project. • Developed a park standards document/policy. • Recommended approval of a bike rack at Wildflower Park. • Reviewed the preliminary plat for Chastek Family Farm. • Toured the open space park located in the Bellwether development. • Approved rules signs for the parks. • Reviewed an open space and preservation plat for Heather Meadows 3rd Addition. • Reviewed a preliminary plat for Fairway Shores Villas at Cook Lake. • Reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed Park Enhancement Program. • Recommended approval of the first Bark in the Park event. • Reviewed a preliminary plat for Upward Acres. 8a. 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov • Reviewed and provided feedback on park naming policies. • Recommended approval of the 2025 fee schedule and Recreation budget. • Received a historical overview of City Park development. • Hosted an open house and online survey to receive community feedback regarding City Park. • Reviewed and provided feedback regarding winter trail maintenance. • Reviewed and provided feedback regarding the boardwalk design within the Bellwether neighborhood. • Recommended approval of former cropland seeding. • Recommended approval of working with See My Legacy for 2025 as part of the Park Enhancement Program. Commissioners are requested to consider the following priorities and provide feedback to staff regarding additions, adjustments, or eliminations: • Diamond Lake Regional Trail: Continue working with Three Rivers Park District to develop trails through the City that align with the cooperative agreement. • Park development: Continue working towards an established park system plan, with further understanding of next steps, financing, and timelines for park projects. • City Park remaster: Work with the staff from HKGi to further the work on the City Park remaster, including 90% and 100% designs, construction documents, cost, and construction. • Wayfinding: Creation of a wayfinding policy for the signage at the parks, including directional and monument signs. • Future financial obligations: Further define the upcoming projects, project upcoming park dedication funds, and earmark funding for specific projects. Attachments None Page 1 of 3 Agenda Item 9a. MEMO Meeting Date: December 19, 2024 To: Parks and Trails Commission From: Dwight Klingbeil Re: Planning Project Update Projects/comments in blue italics are new. The following is a status summary of active planning projects: 1. Kwik Trip CUP, Lot Line Adjustment, and Site Plan (PID 12-119-23-14-0006; 12-119- 23-14- 0004) (City File 23-006) Kwik Trip Inc. submitted a Site Plan, Lot Line Adjustment and CUP application for the two parcels north of Mama G’s in early 2023. A feasibility study was required to evaluate the infrastructure needs of the project. The feasibility study has been distributed to the applicant. Staff and the applicant team continue to work through requirements for the application to move forward. Additional application materials were submitted to the City for a preliminary plat, final plat, variance, conditional use permit and site plan. The application is being reviewed for completeness and is not currently scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 2. Commercial and Industrial Development Standards (Citywide) (City File 23-023) The purpose of this zoning ordinance amendment is to address and evaluate the allowed uses and use specific standards within commercial and industrial developments. The Council adopted a work plan at the November 20, 2023, regular meeting, and requested the Planning Commission to provide their initial feedback. The Planning Commission discussed this item at the December 5, 2023, meeting and expressed their desire Commercial and Industrial Development Standards address a number of items such as: specific architectural standards, infrastructure investment incentives, encouragement toward sustainable development practices, proper transitions of intensities and height, the permitted and conditional uses of each zoning type, verbiage, and lighting standards. City Staff prepared a survey for current landowners and lessees to express their Page 2 of 3 opinions on items addressed with this update. Staff mailed the online survey invitation to property owners and tenants whose property is either currently zoned, or guided for Commercial, Industrial, or Mixed-Use. The comment period for this survey closed on January 31, 2024. During the February 8, 2024, City Council meeting, Council directed staff to prioritize Rural Commercial (CR) and Transitional Rural Commercial (TCR) district updates for approval by the end of quarter 2. Staff presented feedback from the Planning Commission and results from the Business Community Survey to the City Council at the April 25, 2024, regular Council meeting for further direction. The City Council and Planning Commission discussed the Commercial and Industrial standards during the May 21, 2024, Joint Work Session. A survey invitation for feedback on Rural Commercial Subdivisions was posted to the City’s media pages and mailed out to properties within 500 feet of CR & TCR parcels. Council discussed the results of this survey during the June 27, 2024, meeting. A public hearing for an ordinance amendment removing self-storage/mini-storage from the CR and I-1 districts was held at the July 2, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. After some discussion, the Planning Commission motioned to recommend approval of this ordinance amendment. Council approved the zoning ordinance amendment, removing self-storage/mini-storage from the CR & I-1 districts at the July 25, 2024, meeting. A public hearing to clarify the use of development rights for subdivision in the UR, RR, CR, and TCR districts was held at the August 1, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission motioned unanimously to recommend approval of the draft ordinance. Council approved the Zoning Ordinance Amendment at the August 22, 2024, meeting. 3. Pioneer Trail Industrial Park Final Plat & Final PUD (PID 32-119-23-43-0005, 32- 119-23-43-0006, 32-119-23-43-0013)(City File 23-030). Contour Development LLC applied for a Final Plat and a Final PUD at 6210 Pioneer Trail. The application consists of 0 lots and 3 outlots. Council approved this item during the November 25, 2024, City Council meeting. 4. Tonka Auto CUP (PID 26-119-23-12-0004) (City File 24-008). Jake Hautman submitted a Site Plan Amendment, a Conditional Use Permit, and an Interim Use Permit application to allow the operation of an auto repair business, Tonka Auto, at 20201 County Road 50. The public hearing for this item was held during the November 7, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. After some discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this item as presented. Council approved this item during the November 25, 2024, City Council meeting. 5. Corcoran Industrial Northeast (PID 01-119-23-11-0001) (City File 24-010). Hemple Real Estate is seeking Council feedback on conceptual light industrial development at 10585 County Road 101. The plan includes 2 primary industrial buildings ranging from 200,200 to 342,000 sq ft on a 78.85-acre site. The applicant received informal feedback from the Council during the March 28, 2024, Council meeting. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) must be completed should the applicant decide to proceed with this development. 6. Camp Solberg (PID 08-119-23-31-0004) (City File 24-021). Aaron and Melissa Solberg submitted an application for a preliminary and final plat to create two single-family residential lots on Outlot B of Weinand Woods located at PID 08-119-23-31-0004. This item is incomplete for city review and is not currently Page 3 of 3 scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 7. Kariniemi Orchards Preliminary Plat (PID 11-119-23-11-0012) (City File 24-024). Nathan Kariniemi submitted an application for a preliminary open space & preservation plat to allow for the development of 16 single-family lots at 20400 County Road 30. The applicant has withdrawn this application. 8. Old Farm Ridge (PID 36-119-23-33-0008) (City File 24-034). Michael Kelly submitted a preliminary plat, final plat, conditional use permit, and variance application to plat a single lot from Outlot A of Country Season Estates, located at 6620 County Road 116. The application is complete for City review and is scheduled for the December 5, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. 9. Arens Norling OS&P Concept Plan (PID 31-119-23-12-0007) (City File 24-037). Robb Norling submitted a concept plan for an open space and preservation (OS&P) plat that would consist of 8 single-family lots and 1 outlot at 6700 Pioneer Trail. The Council provided informal comments to the applicant during the November 25, 2024, City Council meeting. 10. A+A Tree and Landscape Concept Plan (PID 18-119-23-13-0002) (City File 24-043). A+A Tree and Landscape LLC has submitted a concept plan for a yard waste recycling facility on the property surrounding the Public Works building (PID 18-119- 23-13-0002). This application is under review for completeness and is not currently scheduled for City meetings. 11. Cannabis Regulation Code Amendments (Citywide) (City File 24-044). The City of Corcoran will hold a public hearing regarding the licensing of cannabis related businesses during the December 5, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov MEMO Meeting Date: December 19, 2024 To: Parks and Trails Commission From: Jessica Christensen Buck, Recreation Supervisor Re: Parks, Recreation, and Trails Update ______________________________________________________________________ Summary Park Planning: Summary of City Park engagement survey, City Park meetings with consultants, exploring funding opportunities, and federal funding meetings/tasks. Policy Updates: Continued work with the Community Development and Police Departments to update the special events processes, to include signage. Prepared the draft park enhancement program for the December 19 Parks and Trails Commission packet. Parks and Trails Commission: Prepared materials for the packet and compiled packets for physical and electronic delivery. Holiday Toy and Food Drive: Confirmed attendance with community partners, staff, and City Council. Prepared the route through the City of Corcoran and neighborhoods. Decorated vehicles to be used during the event and coordinated staff assignments. Managed day of logistics and following day clean up from the event. Other: Wrote Parks and Recreation related newsletter articles, attended development review committee meetings, working with the Community Development Director to work through park dedication and funding, and met regarding Three Rivers Diamond Lake Regional Trail reimbursement. 9b. 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov City Council Items: November 25, 2024, City Council Meeting 6f. See My Legacy and Park Enhancement Program • Action – Approved proceeding with See My Legacy in 2025 using funds from Recreation Operating Supplies. 8b. Bellwether Boardwalk Design • City Administrator Tobin gave the presentation on behalf of Public Works Director Mattson. He shared feedback solicited by the Parks and Trails Commission on November 21st, 2024, and provided their recommendation. Council directed staff to move forward with the project choosing design example #2. 8c. Former Cropland Seeding • City Administrator Tobin gave the presentation on behalf of Public Works Director Mattson. MOTION: Bottema moved, Nichols seconded approve evaluation of Fields 1, 2 and 3 and work with agency partners for eligible grant programs as recommended by the Parks and Trails Commission. 8d. Winter Trail Maintenance • City Administrator Tobin gave a presentation on behalf of Public works Director Mattson. Staff shared the feedback and recommendations provided from the Parks and Trails Commission on November 21st. Council discussed policy recommendations and funding options and provided staff with direction. December 12, 2024, City Council Meeting 8b. Public Hearing – Truth in Taxation (2025 Budget and Levy, Wage Schedule) Attachments None AGENDA ITEM 10b. June 15, 2024 Date Park Dedication Memorial Park Maintenance Combined Fund Balance 415-10100 415-10102 01/23 Stantec Invoice 2044165 - Park Planning (118.00) 03/23 Lennar Tavera 4th Addition Park Dedication Fee 140,605.36 04/23 Lennar Tavera 5th Addition Park Dedication Fee 120,328.00 04/23 Pulte Homes Walcott Glenn Park Dedication Fee 470,617.00 03/23 Interest 0.28 06/23 Interest 0.29 07/23 Grove Nursery - Memorial Garden Plants (482.90) 08/23 Grove Nursery - Top Soil (14.60) 08/23 Transfer between bank accounts 497.50 10/23 Rush Creek Reserve 3 104,842.17 10/23 Memorial Garden (242.65) 06/23 Interest (01/2023-06/2023)63,196.04 12/23 Interest (07/2023-12/2023)130,102.17 ENDING BALANCE 4,196,751.77 11,055.35 4,207,807.12 CITY OF CORCORAN PARK CAPITAL FUND REPORT CASH FUNDS Ending balance as of 9/18/2024: $5,237,797.72 *Updates to the spreadsheet are required. 10b. June 15, 2024 Date Park Dedication Memorial Park Maintenance City Park Improvement Combined Fund Balance 415-10100 415-10102 415-10100 06/21 NW Jaycees-City Park Improvement (Splash Pad)100,000.00 12/21 Hanover Athletic Association - Donation 45,000.00 06/23 Corcoran Athletics Association - City Park Donation 5,622.41 4,196,751.77 11,055.35 150,622.41 4,358,429.53 CITY OF CORCORAN PARK CAPITAL FUND REPORT CASH FUNDS