Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011-11-21 - Council Agenda Packet
Agenda Corcoran City Council November 21, 2011 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order /Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval 4. Open Forum 5. Presentations 6. Planning Business a. Highland Subdivision -- Preliminary and Final Plat (06 -31 -001 & 06- 32 -001) (city file 11 -010)* b. Anderson Ag Preserve Enrollment at 22090 Strehler Road (PID 16- 119 -23 -43 -0001) (city file 11 -012)* c. Update on Planning Projects* 7. Engineering -None 8. Public Hearing -Sewer and Water Project* 9. Consent Agenda a. Draft Minutes of November 10, 2011 Council Meeting* b. Snowplowing Policy* 10. Staff Reports /Memos a. Public Safety — PT Officer Retirement & PT Replacement* b. Draft Minutes of November 3, 2011 Planning Commission Meeting* 11. Unfinished Business a. Update on Proposed 2012 Budget* b. Public Works Facility c. Subdivision Ordinance* d. Range Agreement* 12. New Business a. Northwest Trails Association Agreement* 13. Claims as Presented* a. Escrow Claims (Fund #500) b. Building Inspections Claims c. All Other Claims As Presented 14. Unscheduled Items Agenda Corcoran City Council November 21, 2011 7:00 PM 15. Closed Meeting- Performance Review of Administrator and Public Safety Director 16. Review of Upcoming Council Meetings 17. Adjournment *Includes Materials Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet by Door. 7 Agenda Memo- November 21, 2011 To: Mayor and City Council From: Dan Donahue, City Administrator Regarding: Administrator Notes to Council Meeting Agenda 4) Open Forum 5) Presentations -None 6) Planning and Zoning a) Highland Subdivision. See the Planner's packet of information. b) Anderson Ag Preserve. See the Planner's packet of information. c) Update on Planning Projects. See memo. 7) Engineering. None 8) Public Hearing a) Sewer and Water Project. Staff, engineers, and financial consultants are putting together a presentation to start off the public hearing. This will not be ready until just before the council meeting. If we can get it done, I will email the council a copy of the slides prior to the meeting. In your packet is the updated Feasibility Report for the project. Also, there is a resolution for the council to consider after the public hearing is closed. For the resolution, once the council has decided on the base project and any of the alternatives, the specifics will get plugged into the resolution. 90+ notices were mailed out to property owners who are in the vicinity of the base project and the alternatives. Few if any calls have been received by staff or the engineers on the hearing. I did meet with one couple who wanted more information on the base project. 9) Consent Agenda a) Draft Minutes of November 10, 2011 Council Meeting b) Snowplow policy. The council asked at the last meeting to include language that better defines the roadway and the adjacent "right of way ". This has been inserted on page 5 of the policy. 10)Staff Reports. a) Public Safety. See memo by chief Gormley. 11)Unfinished Business. a) Update on 2011 Proposed Budget. In Version 7.0, Jeanie and I have incorporated more explanation as to revenues, which department they are coming from, and an explanation of the source. Also, I am providing a breakdown of training over the past couple of years and expected training for the admin staff. Also, there is a memo on the Admin Department training for 2010, 2011, and 2012 Page 1 Agenda Memo- November 21, 2011 b) Public Works Facility. The city attorney will be at the council meeting but I do not believe he will ready to make a full report on negotiations to purchase the property at 23185 County Road 10. c) Subdivision Ordinance. This planning matter would normally be under the Planning Section at the front of the agenda. Due to the unknown nature and length of the Sewer and Water Public Hearing, this item is at the end of the agenda. If the council has time and wants to take up this item, you can do so. There is no immediate issue if you would like to table until December 19th. The Park Dedication Ordinance update is also slated for the December 19th Council meeting. This was reviewed by the council in October. Several questions were raised at that time. The Planner has addressed these issues in her memo. d) Range Agreement. See the proposed agreement that the city attorney has developed. He will be at the meeting if there are any questions. 12)New Business a) Northwest Trails Agreement. This agreement is identical to the previous agreements approved by the city; the city agrees to act as the fiscal agent for the NW Trails Snowmobile Club and also the collector of the required reports. The city receives funds from the State DNR and disburses those funds to the club if they have met the DNR requirements. The city takes on no financial responsibility or obligation from either the Club or the DNR. 13)Claims. 14)Unscheduled and Other Items 15)Closed Council Meeting. Performance Reviews of Administrator and Public Safety Director 16)Upcoming Council Meetings Council Calendar Planning Commission Parks & Trails Commission Other 1113111 1211111 115112 211112 311112 415112 Cossette Gmach Asleson Milbrandt Guenthner Cossette 1115111 12120111 1117112 2121112 3120112 4117112 Gmach Asleson Milbrandt Guenthner Cossette Gmach June July August Sept October November Page 2 k (Rockford Area Collaborative Efforts) An advisory group working together to iinprove /enhance youth sports programs and facilities within nur district communities. On behalf of all of us on the RACE advisory group we like to say Thank You to all of you that helped us submit our first grant application to the Hennepin Youth Sports Program. Here's a quick highlight recap for you. This was a fast paced process. Our first meeting was Sept 15`h. The grant was officially turned in on Oct. 13`h, 2011. In those 4 short weeks & only 4 meetings as a volunteer group we were able to collectively agree to the following: • Establish a group that represented our communities, currently including: ISD #883, Rockford Community Ed, RAAA (Rockford Area Athletic Association), CAA (Corcoran Athletic Association), City of Rockford, City of Greenfield, City of Corcoran, Corcoran Parks and Trails, Greenfield Park & Advisory, Rockford - Greenfield Area Chamber of Commerce. • Agreed to pursue Hennepin Youth Sports Program grant as a group knowing our quick deadline • Discussed & completed a needs assessment for each group & agreed to pursue the following mutually beneficial items: New baseball field to be located on Greenfield's park property, new softball pavilion in the center of the 4 softball fields behind the schools, new tennis courts to be located on City of Corcoran's park. • Gather grant specific information for application from above organizations & cities. • Reported our proposal & requested support from ISD #883, City of Greenfield, and City of Corcoran & City of Rockford. • ISD #883, City of Greenfield, City of Corcoran, and City of Rockford approved & completed all & any necessary & agreed upon paperwork. • Gathered cost details for our various proposed projects • Reported our proposal & requested support from various additional local organizations • Gathered & completed narratives, graphs, maps, letters of support & budgets for grant application This was a tot to accomplish if this was one entity, considering this involved 9 entities it was a gargantuan feat in 4 weeks! Our process wasn't perfect, but we'll take what we've learned from this & use on our next grant application. Thank you again, to all of you that helped us complete this application! Our Hennepin County Commissioners receive the grant applications the week of Dec 6th & will determine the winner. The winner will be notified some time during the week of Dec. 13th, 2011. Throughout the process this group has been energized & excited by the possibilities of what we can accomplish as a collective group for our local youth athletes. We quickly acknowledged that as a group we could accomplish so much more than any one of us could individually! We have decided to continue our efforts & have named our group RACE (Rockford Area Collaborative Efforts) an advisory group working together to improve /enhance youth sports and facilities within our district communities. Specifically we want to pursue additional grant & fundraising opportunities. Thank you! RACE Advisory Group Citizens for youth athletics Corcoran Greenfield Rockford RAAA CAA Rockford Area Athletic Association Corcoran Area Athletics L A N D F 0 R M From Site to Finish • • 800c Butler Square Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 100 North Sixth Street Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 Minneapolis, MN 55403 www.landform.net City Council Report TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: November 10, 2011 for the November 21, 2011 City Council Meeting RE: Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for "Highland Subdivision" for property located at 10435 County Road 19 (PID 06- 119 -23 -31 -0001 and 06- 119 -23 -32 -0001) (City File 11 -010) 120 -DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: January 18, 2012 1. Application Request Highland Bank is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and final plat to subdivide the existing 60.56 -acre parcel into one 5 -acre lot with the existing home and one 54.19 -acre outlot. The property is located west of County Road 19, north of Meadow Creek Drive and south of the Hanover municipal boundary. The applicant is not proposing any new development on the site at this time. 2. Context Background In 2007, the City Council approved a final plat for a 13 -lot open space preservation development called Prairie Creek Estates (the preliminary plat was approved under the name Meadow View Estates). The developer did not proceed with the development and the approvals for that project have expired. Zoning and Land Use The subject property is guided Rural /Ag Residential and zoned Rural Residential (RR). The property to the east and south is guided Rural /Ag Residential and zoned Rural Residential (RR). The property to the north is in the City of Hanover. The property to the west is in the City of Greenfield. 3. November 3, 2011 Planning Commission Meeting The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item at their November 3rd meeting. Other than the applicant, there was no one present to speak to this item. The Planning Commission asked whether the parcel was one parcel or two. Although Hennepin County shows the property with two PID numbers, the applicant provided a title commitment that Landform'", Sensibly& — M and Site to Finish=" are service marks of Landform Engineering Company. 17 S shows that the two parcels were consolidated in 2009 under a quiet title. The city has no record of this and the Mayor asked if that quiet title was perhaps not recorded at the County. The applicant indicated that it was their belief that the title had been recorded and the private driveway easement between the two old parcels was vacated as part of that. Staff has reviewed this issue and finds no evidence that this combination was ever discussed with the City. We note that it is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the title work is accurate and recordable. After discussing future park dedication requirements and issues related to the quiet title lot consolidation in 2009, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the preliminary plat. 4. November 15, 2011 Parks & Trails Commission Meeting The Parks & Trails Commission was originally scheduled to review this item at their October 18th meeting; however, they did not review it and are now scheduled to review it at their November 15th meeting. We note that dedication is not required at this time, so Parks and Trails Commission review in informational only. Dedication of the horse trail easement will likely be required when Outlot A is platted in the future. 5. ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision - Making The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards The applicant has indicated that the plat is proposed to be able to sell of the existing home and plat the outlot for future development. There are zero (0) development rights remaining on the proposed Lot 1 and six (6) development rights remaining on the proposed Outlot A. Lot Size The plan shows a 5.004 -acre lot (Lot 1, Block 1) and a 54.19 -acre outlot for future development. This exceeds the RR district minimum lot size of 2 acres. The home and accessory buildings would be located on the new lot. The existing home is a legal, non - conforming structure due to setbacks. The home is 38.3 feet from County Road 19 right -of -way where a 100 -foot setback is required. The plat does not change this home's legal, non - conforming status. The existing 1,809- square foot pole barn is within the maximum 2,438 square feet of accessory building allowed by ordinance. The building is a minimum of 100 feet from all lot lines, which is the minimum setback for agricultural use of the building. Highland Subdivision (city file 11 -010) November 21, 2011 meeting 11 S The applicant has prepared a "ghost plat" to show how Outlot A could be developed in the future. Any future development would require City approval of a preliminary plat and final plat. The concept shows access to the future lots on Outlot A via Meadow Creek Drive. This is consistent with City and County policies to limit new access onto County Road 19. Furthermore, Hennepin County recommends that the plat include a condition that development of Outlot A and /or redevelopment of Lot 1 include an elimination of the existing drive onto County Road 19 and a new access onto Meadow Creek Drive. Well and Septic No septic system is shown the plans. The plans should be revised to show the location of the existing septic system on Lot 1 to ensure that setbacks are met. Furthermore, the plans show soil borings on the southern portion of Lot 1 for a future septic location. That location is at the inlet of a drain tile that receives water from the south. Staff has concerns about the proposed location of this future septic system and recommends that the applicant show the area of the proposed septic system on the plans to ensure that the future system would not impact the drain tile. Drainage There are a number of drain tiles identified on site. Care must be taken that future development does not affect drainage or water quality in the drain tiles. Streets No new streets are proposed. The existing home has a driveway on County Road 19, which will remain. Future development of any and all lots from Outlot A would access off Meadow Creek Drive. Wetlands A wetland delineation was done on this property as part of the previous development application. And the delineation was approved by ECWMC on February 8, 2005. A different plan was submitted and approved by ECWMC in 2007. No new delineation is required for this plat. All wetlands must be blanketed by a drainage and utility easement. Additionally, wetland buffers, setbacks and wetland buffer monuments are required in compliance with Section 1050.010, Subd. 5 of the Zoning Ordinance when the property is platted. There are no wetlands on Lot 1, but there are a number of wetlands on Outlot A. Easements and buffers will be required when Outlot A is platted. Parks and Trails The applicant is not proposing any private or public park land with this plat. The Parks & Trails Plan in the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan does not show any park land in this area, but does show a future horseback trail along the north property line and a trail on CR 19 (existing on the east side). Highland Subdivision (city file 11 -010) November 21, 2011 meeting r • i 0 Section 955.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance states "Park Dedication is only due in cases where additional new parcels are created." The subdivision will create one lot for the existing home and one outlot. No additional lots are being created; therefore, no park dedication is due at this time. However, the landowner should expect that park dedication will be due with any future development and that dedication will likely include dedication of the horseback trail easement. Under the current ordinance, park dedication is required at 10% of the net land area. The City may accept cash -in -lieu of land at 10% of the value of the land with a maximum rate of $6,000 per unit for each new unit. Cash in lieu of land would be $6,000 at the current rates (1 x $6,000 per unit). C. Conclusions Staff has reviewed the plan for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. Staff noted in the staff report the outstanding that must be addressed and we have included conditions in the attached draft resolutions to address these issues. 6. RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: a. Resolution Approving Preliminary Plat b. Resolution Approving Final Plat Attachments a. Resolution Approving Preliminary Plat (Res. 2011 -53) b. Resolution Approving Final Plat (Res. 2011 -54) C. Engineer's Memo dated October 25, 2011 d. Hennepin County comments dated October 3, 2011 e. ECWMC comments dated September 28, 2011 f. Plan graphics dated September 20, 2011 Highland Subdivision (city file 11 -010) November 21, 2011 meeting City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -53 Motion By: Seconded By: November 21, 2011 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "HIGHLAND SUBDIVISION" ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD 19 AND MEADOW CREEK DRIVE WHEREAS, Highland Bank, a Minnesota Banking Corporation, has requested approval of a preliminary plat to allow subdivision of the existing 60.556 -acre parcel into one lot and one outlot on property legally described as: That part of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the North line of the plat of Meadow Creek Estates, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved, in accordance with the plans received by the City on September 20, 2011, except as amended by this resolution. 2. There are zero (0) development rights remaining on Lot 1, Block 1. 3. There are six (6) development rights remaining on Outlot A. 4. The applicant must revise the plans to show the location of the existing septic and the location of the future /secondary septic system on Lot 1, Block 1. 5. Outlot A will not be developed at this time and, therefore, shall be exempt from wetland buffer, wetland setback and wetland monument signage requirements. When the property is platted, the site shall be subject to the wetland buffer, setback and monument signage requirements in place at that time. 6. Lot monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. A financial guarantee shall be required to ensure installation per city requirements. 7. Any future development of Outlot A shall comply with the following requirements: a. Access shall be via Meadow Creek Drive, not County Road 19. b. All future subdivisions shall meet the City's minimum lot standards in place at that time. Page 1 of 2 City of Corcoran November 21, 2011 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -53 c. All future subdivisions shall meet the City's wetland setback and buffer requirements in place at that time. d. When either Outlot A develops or Lot 1 redevelops, the landowners should work together to try to eliminate the existing drive on County Road 19 and provide a new access onto Meadow Creek Drive. 8. Park dedication requirements for Lot 1, Block 1 has been previously satisfied. No park dedication is due at this time. However, future subdivision of Outlot A shall be subject to the park dedication policy in effect at the time. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 21St day of November 2011. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 2 of 2 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -54 Motion By: Seconded By: November 21, 2011 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR "HIGHLAND SUBDIVISION" ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD 19 AND MEADOW CREEK DRIVE WHEREAS, Highland Bank, a Minnesota Banking Corporation, has requested approval of a final plat to allow subdivision of the existing 60.556 -acre parcel into one lot and one outlot on property legally described as: That part of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the North line of the plat of Meadow Creek Estates, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a final plat for Highland Subdivision and, FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to release of the final plat for recording with the County: 1. A final plat is approved to create 1 lot and 1 outlot for Highland Subdivision, in accordance with the revised plans received by the City on September 20, 2011, except as amended by this resolution. 2. There are zero (0) development rights remaining on Lot 1, Block 1. 3. There are six (6) development rights remaining on Outlot A. 4. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the preliminary plat. 5. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of preliminary plat approval. 6. Park dedication requirements for Lot 1, Block 1 has been previously satisfied. No park dedication is due at this time. However, future subdivision of Outlot A shall be subject to the park dedication policy in effect at the time. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to release of the final plat for filing: 1. The final plans shall be revised to address all conditions of approval. Page 1 of 2 City of Corcoran November 21, 2011 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -54 2. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plat drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. 3. A financial guarantee shall be provided to the City to ensure that lot monuments are installed as required per Section 960.050 of the City Code. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to release of any remaining escrow balance: 1. Lot monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. 2. The applicant must file the final plat for Phase I at Hennepin County within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. 3. The applicant shall provide proof of recording the final plat and resolutions at Hennepin County. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 21St day of November 2011. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 2 of 2 City Seal Wenck TO: Kendra Lindahl, City Planner FROM: Kent Torve, P.E. DATE: October 25th, 2011 SUBJECT: Highland Subdivision Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Ctr. P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0249 (763) 479 4200 Fax (763) 479 -4242 E -mail: wenckmp @wenck.com The plat was reviewed along with the Hennepin County comments dated 10/4/2011 and the Watershed comments dated 9/28/2011. There are no additional comments from the City Engineer's perspective. Hennepin County Transportation Department - . .... _..__... _ ..- .._.... 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, Mfg 55340 -5421 Ms. Kendra Lindahl, City Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Dear Ms. Lindahl: 612- 596 -0300, Phone 763 - 478 -4000, FAX 763 - 478 -4030, TD D www.hennepin.us Re: Highland Subdivision — Preliminary & Final Plat CSAH -19 / Meadow Creek Drive — northwest quadrant Hennepin County Plat Review No. 3222 / City File No. 1 1 -0 10 October 4, 2011 Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. We received your transmittal of the Preliminary & Final Plat on September 22, 2011. Right -of -Way /Easement Dedication — No additional dedications are needed. The half right -of -way is 60 -feet along the frontage of the property in this segment of County Road 19. All right -of -way necessary for the long- term future was obtained as part of the recent county reconstruction project for CSAH -19 (CP- 9225). Site Access — CSAH -19 is anticipated to continue to be an important and busy roadway. While we prefer to minimize direct driveway access whenever possible, it is understood that the driveway from the existing house to CSAH -19 will remain as part of this platting action. It is recommended that the city include language in its approvals that upon any redevelopment of this lot (Lot 1 / Block 1), future access should be reoriented to Meadow Creek Drive — we assume this is the city's intent for the future street (Outlot B -F) shown on the ghost plat. It is also recommended that city approvals include the intent that all access from future Lot 3 -F also be oriented to Meadow Creek Drive. Permits - Please inform the developer(s) that any proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to driveway and street access (for the joint driveway), drainage and utility construction, sidewalk / trail construction, and landscaping. The permit applications are processed through our epermitting system at: https:/ /roadpermits.co.hennepin.mn.us. Permit questions can be directed to Carolyn Fackler at (612) 596 -0336. Please contact Bob Byers (612) 596 -0354 or robert .byers(a,co.hennepin.mn.us for any further discussion of these items. Sincerely, James N. Grube, P.E. Director of Transportation and County Engineer JNG /rqb cc: Plat Review Committee — Benicke / Byers / Dauer / Drager / Fackler / Holtz / Hooper / Lowry / Witt Mark Larson, Hennepin County Survey Office An Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper Kendra Lindahl From: Ali .Durgunoglu @co.hennepin.mn.us Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 20115:13 PM To: Kendra Lindahl Cc: judie @jass.biz; James.Kujawa @co.hennepin.mn.us Subject: Highland Subdivision - City File No. # 11 -010 Hello Kendra, On February 8, 2005, Elm Creek WMC approved the boundary and type of wetlands on this property (ECWMC # 2005- 001, Tessmer /Kalk Properties; PID 06- 11923 -31 -001 & PID 06- 11923 -32 -001). A new development proposal was submitted in 2007 (ECWMC # 2007 -010; Meadow View Estates), and subsequently was approved by the Commission. A WCA Exemption was issued for this development on May 29, 2007. This latest submittal is proposing to divide the subject property into two parcels. One parcel, Lot 1, Block 1 containing 5.004 acres (including an existing house, garage and a pole barn), as a single residential parcel, and a second parcel, Outlot A containing 54.190 acres of vacant land will be available for future development. This layout is significantly different form the plan approved in 2007. The Commission does not need to review this subdivision. However, staff would like to bring to your attention that there is an existing drain tile running south to north between the house and the pole barn (Lot 1, Block 1). The inlet of this drain tile is located almost on the edge of the proposed septic field. This drain tile receives water from an area south of the proposed Lot 1, Block 1. This could be problematic when Outlot A develops in the future. The proximity of an existing drain tile to a septic field is also detrimental to water quality. Any future subdivision of Outlot A may need to be reviewed by the Commission. Sincerely, Ali Durgunoglu, Ph.D., P.E. Hennepin County Dept. of Environmental Services 417 N. 5th Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 -3206 Ali .Durgunoglu @co.hennepin.mn.us PHONE: (612) 596 -1171 FAX: (612) 348 -8532 www.henneoin.us Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney - client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. -pw"'RELIMINARY PLAT I�Tl��!"'�!7 € f t1 !�i tom' 1 #!F I!!►,wJ i D • i- • LOCATION MAP NO SCALE SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION COVLR SHEET / SHEET INDEX EXISTING CONp00NS PLiti3V / CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 3, PRFLIMINA;f Y SITE PLAN / PRELIMINARY PLAT 4. GHOST PLAT / FUTURE SUBDIVIS €ON PLAN SURVEYOR/ LAND PLANNER APPLICANT ACRE LAND SUR`9'EY € >JC, INC. HIGHLAND BA`4K 9140 BALTIMORE STREET NE 21G0 FORD PARKWAY SUITE to ST. PAUL, MN 55116 BLAINE, MN 55448 MIKE ANDERSON (952) 858 -4768 (763) 78.3 -1880 JOSHUA P. SC NEIPER, P'uS (763) 238 -E278 CELL AND 0 R HIGHLAND F3ANK 2.1CO FORD PAWWAY ST. PAUL, MN 55116 MIKE ANDERSON (952) 853 -4768 6 ®r) e° — oa � €I y 3 � 4 IEO rF ZRRW ce CHFCAm a O v z G : i 9 V mLL 3p R� 24 20 crs cn �w �z 1- M W U) U) ¢ E' _# Lj F- U > Li 0To V U) 2 U PAW 9/19/201' PRLtECT N0. 11329 1/4 �.: µm,v rrupc�s suw \n�iww armK \i�a<e -rr \awgU��xe- rr.owg a��nJ�u�� a:aowr 0 T 1, MY OF MANVVtK, MINNESOTA A IT A" C. (SVey T. Rim A FL F,w D 2 J.M" F. James F,patorneff RA E (RA) T. It I- FlarInt, Thamm K Rhode (RA) r 61 J F;�', t th. L000rd Real rAtoto KaToIng. U.0 th 1;� f the Nl/Z W th� S%N1 e, T.p t�% age. 2� west 1/4 Co-, r 5- S. Tr, I �9, Pg, 23 (RA) 7 -W 2019 A.— -A 2� 6i2 gt' WET LAND clf WET LkNi) ------------ - 4 A 4" INV -1 1� .1 1" N�,�o A� f th, N 1/2 f4h. ox P - _t v !464sa .. MI. PW Na. 7�4Wg 214 CMp C:5 ...... �V"� -48" St-1 V N�r4g'l 4't a----------- WET AT T ---------- 2 Dl.m File ) / / I , , qD "'x _7 0 -5 ---------- --------- I --------- - TOTALsm Rood RW� J, %fT LANa 7 F --------- WET LAND 6 E -- -- ------ I C, --- --------- ------ 9ya A 7 S 947,46"W� J&nm D. Quell R. R. U=14 '(R,R-) 113 �FL=996 GT f - ESTATES - _30.. F,'1NV_9a6L67 co-a James M I)esm" & RohW A. Teasrttar z ea J� D. UZ-All &C If R, Uzzol Nam R. Munson (RR) (tat) s9 < 2: 0— 1,- 0 th. SM/4 0 S_ 6, T.r,. 11P, 6q¢. 23 �,,pi. C-.ty C,�11 I— Mt 0 khe > 0 mmau13[was' Corner .1 S.,.. R, Twp. 314 R91 2) h89'46 '12 "E Sv,kh 1/4 Corner F S� 6, 119. Rge, 23---, W X cn 264091 :D W LEGEND LL_ GENERAL NOTES DENOTES PROPOSED SETBACKS (D o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED (f) 1, 1" ownership 1*7 vested In: HIgNand Bank. a Minnesota Banking Goiporatlan listed with Hoqn*pO County Under Parcel la C DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET C) LLI Number: 06-119-2,1-31-0001 and 06-119-23-32-0001. C) F-- 0 < Z Address of the surveyed premises: 10435 County Road No. 19, Corcoran, MN 55374. < ri, 3. Bearings shown harem are based an the Hennepin County Coordinate S DENOTES HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT C 0 0 4. boundary am of the surveyed pfsrrI*osl *2,637,810 sq. ft. (60.556 .1n.17. IS DENOTES CATCH BASIN Li- _J 6. The City of Corcoran has Indkated that the Er Ul DENO`It�S POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES Zone premises on this survey is currently zoned RR (Rural Residential), 6. Surveyed promises are shown to lie wItN* Flood ding to the Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Pane No. 27053r-0019-E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 6ff-11- 60110 September d, 2 DENOTES SIGN surveyed premisoa has access to Moodain Greek Drive and County Road I, . 'I't public r DENOTES FENCE 7. The "_..t,�14, LEGAL DESCRIPTION a Utilities shown hereon are based m 0 topogralshbod survey by Quality Site Design, LLC dated May 1, 2007. The location of That pad of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin 5< Lj some underground utilities raiated to storm drainage ware. Verified an Part of this sulrvay. The focatim of underground utnitzes DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE LLJ 0 md/, tructuran may wry from locations shown harem and addffimol Underground ublitles and/or structures may CwAty� Minnesota, 1�4ng northerly of the North lint of the plot of MEADOW CREEK ESTATES, an file and of be record In the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. encountered. Contact Gopher State One Ca61 Notification Center at (651) 454-0002 for vW1500tion of utility type and field DENOTES GRAVEL location, prior to excavation, S. The field survey of this site was completed an September 2nd, 2011. DENOTES BITUMINOUS 10. The legal 'JescePption shown on this survey Is based on Court Flo NO.: 27-OV-05-1623 Dated and Fried October 28, 2009. DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DAIE if. The locations Of the wetlands ShOwn on this survey are based on a topographical survey by Quality 51te Design, LLC dated May GRAPHIC SCALE 1, 2607. * 1529 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION BENCHMARK n 1. — 9/19/ 2011 12 All commonly Owned contiguous land Is Included in this plat, DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC RAILROAD SPIKE IN NORTH FACE OF 6TH POWER POLE WEST OF Fk&mr NIX DENOTES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE COUNTY ROAD NO. 19 ON NORTH SIDE OF MEADOW CREEK DRIVE: fur FEU DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS ELEVATION - 1005,75 11329 DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE SWET Ka DENOTES STORM SPRIER DENOTES SOIL BORINGS BY MARK TRADEWELL 0 DENOTES WELL 2/4 C:\Lmd PTI,*t- 2000\HI9hIA S.*\II:529-FP\ft\1I320-,FP.dWQ 2/19/2017 11:45mn W.,1 1/4 C—ai, aS 5 , T-. 119, 1 23 ---------- VFET LAN;) ------------------ ------------ i W", WET LAND eVf I f jern" D. Ui & R. R. Uzza (RR) of the S—th—A CCC.oMnty 0 S... 6. Tp. 119 Rge CITY OF HANOVER, MINNESOTA ',4ASSAI,; i R Pttmell (RA) (RA) Leonard Rem Eiii hodi ULC -N.,th ' of `,n NI /2 0 t— SW' Z4 f 5- 6 Tp 119 Rqe, 27 r Sfi W A" Q & 2�i T. Rim T, A L. Ili (RA) 2 5�197 f 1067 V- V -7f - I L / , , ' , I" , I" --- -'.. 1, 1� 1, ND ------ WET LA LOT 79c'i fk 5.904 ------------ LO K A ' O J -F IN4' 97556 -48 St -i F -LSil -- �20Q* 29K YtCT 2V 5t.�. ,ND ----------------- C ti t "Tool -_'_ --------------- J '11��MOT A NE P T LOT 3—P- + LqT 2�'� +H '----L0T2—r— --LOT f ift 0, 1'.7 745 117,715 q it, 2 'M arses 2.70 In 2.,740 ft 71 1" BLO E3 QK 247, i T;I. fV T I .2, 41 [_�79 Kattll— Ri Z JA V 77 IN 6.74 CM is D! ----- 200 2 -- Ilk l- 1541± CB T� 996.40 , �, ?2 r, it -f �Aoaw Ci ESTA.TE5 I IN 9 9 1 OG IN V I a1,0 89 lai I i & R. R. Ui jurn so M T� & Ra A. T� V Mark R. i GENERAL NOTES 1. Fee owneris vested i Highland Bank. Parcel ID Number. 06-119-2,1-31—OD01 and 06-119-23_ 0001 2. Addi of the surveyed pramli 0435 County Rood No. 19, Corcoran, M14 55374. 3- Bearings shown hereon era based on Henneii County Coordinate System. 4, Boundary area of the wi promi"w :E2,637,810 sq. ft. (60,556 acroi t' The City of Corcoran has Indicated that the surveyed premises shown on tift survey is currently zoned M (Rural Resi S. Suiyed premises w l th f lood Zon x according to the Flood oo d insurance Rat e Map Community No 27 K W g E by e Management Agency, effective date � bemb 2 2 4, 7. The ram 'e"has a ca eas to Meadow Cr 0 and County Road No I 9' Plic street a. Lill si wn h ff are based survey y W�ity S�* Design. U� doted May 1 2 7 The e underground u I a 1 r 61 ated to storm �oini were fied as paof his rve Y. Th a I of und underground d ks on ruct re 5 m cy vary from $scat W i aho Z h er � and 0 ddl fan al underground P" encountered. Contact Gopher State One Call Notification Canter at 1 454-0002 for verification of utility t and flefd iii prior to "covotion. 9. 7C field i of this site was completed on te"M 2nd, Ld and Filed Databeir 2A 10. Logo[ description Iff based upon Court File No,: !T-CY —ti$ 01a 21 11, Wei shown an the survey are based on <I topowaphi survey by Ouafty Site Design, LLC dated May 1, 2007. IZ Additional title Volk will need to be completed to see If any eQiiernenta or oncumbi are located within subject property. 13. Ali commonly owned OonVqi land Is Inni €n this plot 14. No grading, ti removal or other site moc0ficcition will occur as part of this project BENCHMARK RAILROAD SPIKE IN NORTH FACE OF tiTH POWER POLE VEST OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 19 ON NORTH SIDE OF MEADOW CREEK Di ELEVATION = 1005,75 LOT DATA F- ANIMUM LOT DEPTH FT- REAR RD — 2UT, i' ff ihe SM/4 f S 1, Tw1. 113, RSe 23 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH -jQ2FT. NH9'45'12'E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LEGEND DENOTES PROPOSED SMACKS LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED That Part of the North Half of the Southwest Quarts of o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET Section 6, Township 119. li 23, Hennepin County, DENOTES HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT Minnesota, lying northerly of the North line of the plot of MEADOW CREEK ESTATES, on file and of record In the oi 0 DENOTES CATCH BASIN of the County ROW40r, Hennepin County. Minnesota. DENOTES CONlFEROUS TREE -- -------- di DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES - >— DENOTES SIGN DENOTES FENCE DENOTES SOIL BORINGS BY MARK TRADEWELL DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE 0 DENOTES GRAVEL DENOTES BITUMINOUS ------ DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS BENCHMARK RAILROAD SPIKE IN NORTH FACE OF tiTH POWER POLE VEST OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 19 ON NORTH SIDE OF MEADOW CREEK Di ELEVATION = 1005,75 LOT DATA F- ANIMUM LOT DEPTH FT- REAR RD — 2UT, 14 jq z z —iih 1/4 119, R9-, 21 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FFFT —h r $00 it UM LOT AREA —!�—ACRES YARD SE78A(>( 25 FT. ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: FRONT YARD— SAME AS BUILDING SETBACKS SIDE YARD-- 20 Ft. REAR YARD— 15 FT. DRi AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOYM THUS: I Na SCALE WHIS 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND AI)Ji RIGHT--OF—WAY LINES AND ADJOINING ALL LOT LiNi UNLESS OTHEIMSE SHOW CIA THE PLAN orsili LC DRAW LM Di 0 `E4 cO ; z C; LD C) U) 0 5: LLJ 0 M 5i M < :D C Z LIJ < _j (D Li PAT 9/19/20111 PAO" 7' Na 11329 99FT Na 4/4 C:\pord Pots 2000\1i 9/110/=1 11:47— DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION MINIMUM LOT WIDTH -jQ2FT. DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DENOTES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE DENOTES CONlFEROUS TREE q STREET--- — - >— DENOTES STORM SEWER d DENOTES SOIL BORINGS BY MARK TRADEWELL 0 DENOTES WELL 14 jq z z —iih 1/4 119, R9-, 21 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FFFT —h r $00 it UM LOT AREA —!�—ACRES YARD SE78A(>( 25 FT. ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: FRONT YARD— SAME AS BUILDING SETBACKS SIDE YARD-- 20 Ft. REAR YARD— 15 FT. DRi AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOYM THUS: I Na SCALE WHIS 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND AI)Ji RIGHT--OF—WAY LINES AND ADJOINING ALL LOT LiNi UNLESS OTHEIMSE SHOW CIA THE PLAN orsili LC DRAW LM Di 0 `E4 cO ; z C; LD C) U) 0 5: LLJ 0 M 5i M < :D C Z LIJ < _j (D Li PAT 9/19/20111 PAO" 7' Na 11329 99FT Na 4/4 C:\pord Pots 2000\1i 9/110/=1 11:47— HIGHLAND SUBDIVISION k�"-PO >,C"4 ", M 771 -k C"4- r 5- 6. TrrP Itp. R;i'. 2,-,'--' 50 '0 1 L 40 T 1 S85'4X! 4:'W "Pi:) Co- -Iy CCSL 1, M-67t at the -k !/4 C—e of S— 6. TrrP. 119. Kee. 23 A T - -- S-th 1— V,, �WV4 f T.P, 11�. 23 Hnncp,, Lou ni} C;wt — Vo—,.t t the r—'Ay r—t' S 'h 1�'4 C,.., f S., S. Twp 119. R- - ' - 8, 61j'4s',k'E S—%—m C.— 2.1 2r,40 91 WN ALL PERSONS SY THESE PRESENTS: That HIqhhmd BqO% a Minnesota 0-khg Casp—tion. F- owner of the f-II—Ing. dso-lbod Property, STATE OF UNNEWTA COUNTY OF North HWf of the S..th-ost Qv-,t- of Section 8, 1 HonnepIn County, Mkmsovto, lying northerly of the north line of the plat cf MrAWW �OAW file and of record I� the AM f the County mlandniatm This Iioirmsat was a0tnonviodged before m,a ibis day of 20— by Jh.. P. soh.*kW. He" mad the same to be wrnypd and platted am KQt LAND SUB WMON and do hereby of n4t* sad dedicate to the public far plblt use f0tewr the pvbllc eay wd draInago and etlHty easements as shows — this &L The West line of the N1/2 of the SWI Sec. 6, M rIt— harol sold i4q�ei SqM, q Mk�oMo Banking Corporation, hoe caueod th000 proaanto to be algaed by ft proper offitser this day of 20, T, 111), R. 23, Is assumed to have a bee of 1410FILAND BANK, South 00 degrees 10 minutes 37 seconds West. City CauhcA, CRy of Caronran, Minnesota V�Wkl W, An,*., SWW, VI. President T11, plot of SM and oc=l I,, City4=�=:tfC11, Cwt, at a rogulor meeting the-sof held this doy of If .=D ON W, = Ty— Fo*M444 r000gm T,.= Zn day PWW has the N9. me at th 0 4 the C�aty Hr rar have been rGoolvoa the City or STATE OF MINNESOTA tkp-d wItWA r000pt at such *mm,&nta and �nendutkm*, as atiMdod by 14Tnawto Statutes. Sect $Ubd- 2. • Denotne monument found 1/2 Inch iron pipe, unless COUNTY Or CRY covooll. my of Comore., hdbn--t% other W Shown. The Foregoing Instrument was ovkno*%dqW before me this day of 20� by 0anid M, Anderson. as Swim We President of Highland Umk. . 0 Denotes f/2 Inch by 14 Inch Iron monument not i4b"goot- OwOflng C-porGtk-% on balldf of the Cavorotlari,— By mayor By Clerk and marked by L-S, No. 44655. Denotes approximate edge of wetland as defined by TAXPAYEIR SEIM= DEPARTMENT, Hanneft County, M"wtA Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 505.01, subd, 3. No1='1.11,- Coult,� 111"nesolo I hereby oertyly that tmft payable In 2Q__ -,I prior yoara how been pea for ffe land doopribed on shla plat, dated day a 20— DRAJNAOE AND U4UTY EASSNENTS SHOW114 IHM fl 'CAL.; IDO A L Maroon, County AutAtor ey DWUtY 4 Joshua P. Sohnolmisr do hereby amity that this plot was prepared by me or under my dha wpwvWm; thvi I onn a duly Woosed fond Surveyor lo the Stoke of mh-d-oft; ihot this Nei Is . at rWn8Qeatqjl0n at the boundary aor' IM11 .9 mailivorn.tiof dots and lobal. are 0"Matly d.WWbd - this ptot- that 01 nnorm* low on =Ihove !0 - --i =c been, or Wit be corroefly set *Rhin -a yua�, that .9 b=—dad. and vat land, — defined In MInnwtQ StQtu . SeatIm SM01. SA4 3, of kP= of this we SURVEY MqSoi. Ron—* C—ty, Wlh�bo 2 IN -hm and labeled M this Oct, and di public ways are shown and labeled on this jAeL P—t to NN. STAT. S". 3M.565 (19691 thb plat has been approved this day of 20_ DOW day of 20_ ud NO SCALE — ' s t Mnowota Lkwm 14mbr 441155 BEING 10 FM IN WIDTH AND ADMNING RIGHT--OF -WAY ACFE LAND VMVEYM COUNTY KCMDM. Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the 01hin pint of HICKWO S=P PISION was retarded In this offlos this day sf LINES AND AWMNG ALL LOT LINES, UA.ESS OTHEIMSE SHOM ON TIKE PLAN. III 20_ at midtad H. Conhw, Cw-ty Rowder By Deputy Tradew ll Soil Testing 18330 Oahlia Street N,W. etlar, MN 55011 November I1�, 2011 Acre Land Surveying 9144 Baltimore 5trm NE Blaine, MN 55449 ,Attu. ,lash Schnieder Re; 10435 County Road 919, Corcoran, -mN (Lot 1 EJOCk 1 Highland Subdivision) Dear Josh, Where is some question as to the location of the proposed morInd site and existing meld draintile pipe that passes by that area. to my opinion the, function of the mound would not be jeopardized by the drainti.le being where it is. The actual absorption area ofthe� mound would be at least 8'- 10' tom the drairltile pipe. The, draintl� system would & not be influenced by the mound being there as 'well- Tho effluent passes through the sail in the absorption area directly below the mound and would not hydraulically overload or add any additional 'water to the the system. In addition to the site that has been established there are many ether possible places for the system to go on the site. The area directly Nest of the homesite was not tested at the time because of the coma crop that was still in place, but this would also provide a good site in closer proximity to ale eXisting system. 'Sincerely, Mark Tradewell MPCA 9307 Agenda Item L A N D F 0 R M From Site to Finish • • • i 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Suite 513 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 Minneapolis, MN 55401 www.landform.net TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: November 9, 2011 for the November 21, 2011 City Council Meeting RE: Request for Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve Designation for 40.12 acres of land owned by Sara Ann Anderson (PID 16- 119 -22 -43 -0001) (City file no. 11 -012) 1. Application Request The landowner is requesting city approval to re- enroll land into the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program. Sara Ann Anderson is purchasing the property contract for Deed from Duane Oestreich and both have signed the application as required. Notice of this request was published in the local paper as required by State statute. 2. Background In 2008, the applicant received approval of a Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure exceeding ordinance standards for a building related to Ridesport Stables, which she operates on site. Chapter 473H of the State Statutes generally requires a minimum of 40 acres to be eligible for Agricultural Preserve, with some exceptions. This property meets those minimum requirements. The property is currently enrolled in Agricultural Preserve, but will be removed from Agricultural Preserve on November 26, 2011. The property is classified as Agricultural Preserve on the 2030 Future Land Use Map, which has a maximum residential density of one house per forty acres as required by State Statute. The owner must sign an eight -year perpetual covenant/agreement to leave the property in agricultural use, and farm using acceptable practices. In return, there are number of benefits to a landowner who enters into this program, including the fact that special assessments cannot be levied on Agricultural Preserve property. The City has discretion when considering designating land as Agricultural Preserve and must determine whether the designation has any negative impact for the City. The Comprehensive Plan states "The City of Corcoran encourages the continuation of agricultural use within the community. This policy expresses the City's endorsement of the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves program. All land parcels in the City that meet the requirements for eligibility in the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves program according to Minn. Stat. Section 473H may apply to the City for enrollment. This policy is not intended to interfere with agricultural status of any lands prior to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan." Landform'm, SensiblyGreen M and Site to Fin ish'm are service marks of Landform Engineering Company. • • • 3. Conclusion The applicant complies with Agricultural Preserve standards. Staff has drafted a resolution for approval of the designation. 4. Recommendation i The City Council should move to adopt the resolution approving designation for this parcel as Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve. Attachments 1. Resolution Approving Ag Preserve Designation (Res. 2011 -55) 2. Location Map 3. Land Use Map 4. Agricultural Preserve Application Anderson Agricultural Preserve Designation (city file 11 -012) November 21. 2011 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -55 Motion By: Seconded By: November 21, 2011 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR METROPOLITAN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE DESIGNATION FOR 40.12 ACRES OF LAND (PID 16- 119 -23 -43 -0001) OWNED BY SARAH ANN ANDERSON WHEREAS, the below described parcel is located outside of the 2030 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); WHEREAS, the parcel was scheduled to be removed from Agricultural Preserve on November 26, 2011; WHEREAS, the parcel is currently designated as "Agricultural Preserve" in the 2030 Future Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, the owner of the described parcel has made official application for their designation as an agricultural preserve; and WHEREAS, the requirements regarding size, covenants, development density and other stipulations of the act are deemed legally satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the following properties on property legally described below is hereby designated as Agricultural Preserve: The southwest' /4 of the southeast' /4 of Section 16, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the property is classified as "Agricultural Preserve" in the 2030 Future Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Plan, which will create more stringent zoning for the duration of the requested designation. No subdivisions can occur unless and until said properties are removed from the Agricultural Preserve Program. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 21St day of November 2011. Page 1 of 2 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk November 21, 2011 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -55 Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 2 of 2 City Seal Hennepin County Property Map Print Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County Property Map - Tax Year: 2011 The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin nnepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. http://gis.co.hennepin.mn.us/HCPropertyMap/Locator.aspx 11/8/2011 ° I w � � I 0 1 r v I i 1 i i r 0 .ate Q '0' x � a ■ I ■■ [� x 112612010 RD 0 rr 1 w 1 1 O 1 U t 1 M 1 JUBERT J F LL LAKE x ° ..I. C 2I12I281 z j ❑ ' z _ P O MORIN NROAD / HORSESHOE TR L ! GLEASO a 1 LAKE i Figure 8 tyRCOR 4 2030 Future Land Use Plan 2030 Comprehensive Plan N�����yjjj '''.. W- � E S V 3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet i� •,� City Limit OStaging Boundaries Agricultural Reserve (Date of Expiration) Wetlands Rural /Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential - High Density Residential Rural Service /Commercial - Commercial - Mixed Use - Business Park Light Industrial - Public /Semi - Public Parks /Open Space - Golf Course Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open Water 'The Future Land Use plan depicts the location and intensity of future development through a variety of land use types This plan is intended to guide future development however the City has discretion to amend (with Metropolitan Council approval) the plan in response to landowner/ developer requests or response to other system plans. October 7, 2010 . Bonestroo 1:1504 /50408144 /GIS /ComPlan /Maps /Final Maps /2030 flu.mxd ATTACHMENT A APPLICATION FOR INITIATING PLACEMENT OF LAND INTO A METROPOLITAN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE LOCAL AUTHORITY: �� 6 r,4 i C nyaeland (if applicable) PRINT OR TYPE NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES) OF RECORD FEE OWNER(S) Owner(s) is ( "X" one): (Use this space only if applicable. Must be same names as on page 1.) Individual 0 Legal Guardian 0 Family Farm Corporation 0 Other 2. PRINT OR TYPE NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES) OF CONTRACT FOR DEED BUYER(5) (VENDEES) (Use this space only if applicable. MusD be same names as on page 1.) �z S+k- -e h (e- v 1-C( . Gn n .5-53410 3. PRINT OR TYPE NAMES) AND ADDRESS(ES) OF CONTRACT FOR DEED SELLER(S) (VENDORS) (Use this space only if applicable. Must be ,same names as on page 1.) l ?. 5"c, -7 d s'k Pt / �—% 0 -� -, k4 � 4, BASIS OF ELIGIBILITY OF LAND ( "X" one): 40 or more acres of land. 0 Non - contiguous parcels of at least ten acres each; parcels farmed as a unit. 0 35 -acre parcel, bound by public right -of -way or pert urbation in the rectangular survey system. 0 20 -acre parcel, subject to the conditions of Minnesota Statutes, section 4731-1.03, subdivision 4. S. TOTAL ACRES: 6. TYPE OF PROPERTY ( "X" one): Abstract 0 Registered (Torrens). If "TorrenS" property, include your Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title. Minnesota Depatlment of AgAculloe 625 N. Robert St. St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -2539 A6- 00870 -0 651-201 -6369 4129106 FOR LOCAL AUTHORITY ONLY: 7. This application has been reviewed by this Authority and is determined complete this - _ aay of, The restrictive covenant and the affidavit from the Authority certifying eligibility of the land are included in this application. & DATE OF PLACEMENT OF LAND INTO PRESERVE: of (Signature and Title or Position of Loeal Authority) (Must he thirty days after the date in No. 7 above.) 4linnewa Depnamew of Agriculture 625 N. Rohert St_ SC Paul. Minnesota 55153 2939 AG- 00870 -0 651 -201 -6369 4!29106 METROPOLITAN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVES RESTRICTIVE COVENANT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this �' ayof by and between Sal%' -r+ %� i d i , Record Fee Owner(s); Contract for Deed Vendors) (Sellers), if any; Contract for Deed Vendee(s) (Buyers), if any; hereinafter collect' ely referred.�o as Landowner(s); AND the of County, Minnesota, (NOTE: Above named Landowner(s) must be identified as husband and wife, a single person, a Partnership, a (State) Corporation, a Trustee of a Trust (describe), a Guardian or Administrator of an Estate (describe) — whatever the case night be — If property is homestead —spouse must join whether their none is on record or not — ff property is non - homestead and spouse doesn't join then a statement mast be put at end of tegaf description that it is non - homestead.) 1ITNESSETH; WHEREAS. the Landowner(s) ahov'e named are the owners of the tract of land (the Land) in the County of State of Minnesota, legally described as: (7FTORREA'S PROPERTY — Use description from Certificate afTille, verbatim; IF ABSTRACT PROPERTY— Use description from abstract or deed, if possible, or get it from your county auditor. Use cm additional sheer rf extra space is needed. Be sure to state your parcel irlentificauon number and whether ar not Your property is homesteaded.) Parcel identification number: Ae ee mestea r Non - homestead ( cioc Otte) Legal Description: SW WHEREAS, the Landowner desires to receive the benefits of participation in the State of Minnesota Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program established by Minn. Stat., Chapter 473H, and has made application for initiating placement of the Land into a Metropolitan agricultural preserve, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment At and W}iEREAS, the Land described here n is classified as agricultural pursuant to Minn Stu Section 273.13 and �DYCo!/Gtf_1]_le_ritf->Ene 1�, u.ffl(l?- ......_ has(hase) approved and certified this Land as being eligilale�' desit� tic n as an agricultural pres�-, a cop} of the affidavit evidencing that the land is certified long -term agricultural is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Attachment B; WHEREAS, Minn. Slat., Section 473H.05, requires that the applicant complete and file as part of his application a "restrictive covenant which shall constitute an easement running with the land "; NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of receipt of the benefits of participation in the State of Minnesota Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program, the Landowner on behalf of himself, his successors and assignees, agrees and covenants as follows: 1. The Land herein described shall be kept in agricultural use. Agricultural use as that is used herein means the production for sale of livestock. dairy animals, dairy products, poultry or poultry products, fur bearing animals, horticultural or nursery stock, fruit. iegetables, forage, grains, or bees and apiary products. Wetlands, pasture and woodlands accompanying land in agricultural use shall be deemed to be in agricultural use. 2. The Land herein described shall be used in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Slat., Chapter 4731{ which exist on the date of this covenant. 3. This Restrictive Covenant shall be binding on the owner, or his successors and assignees. and shall he an easement running with the land. Minnesoia Deparunent of Agriculture 625 N. Robert St. St Pavl, Minnesota 55155 -2539 612 -201 -6364 1 AC- 00869.02 4/428/06 4. Duration, This Restrictive Covenant shall he in force and effect in accordance with the aforementioned statute: a. until expiration initiated pursuant to Minn, Stat., Section 473H.08 becomes final; h, until the agricultural preserve is terminated by executive order of the Governor; or C. until the Land is acquired by eminent domain; all in accordance with Minn. Stat., Chapter 473H. This Agre; ment and Restrictive Covenant may be enforced by the or the State of Minnesota, or by an interested /rson, by appropriate action in the courts /�o-f( the �State of (Minnesota. 'Phis instrument was completed by-_,..- �� V""� k4 %i l'1_ Wicks -js k-i on a form pmpared and approved by the Minnesota Dep:urment of Agriculture. 90 West Plata Bled.. St. Paul, Minnesota 55107. IN WTTNESS HEREOF, the parties to this agreement have caused this instrument to be executed on the day and year first above written. (To be sighed in the presence of a noto0pPublic with exact .rave name as mr page l.) Witnessed Signature of Record Fee Ouner(s) : Witnessed Si nature of Contract for Deed Vendors Se ers if an : r Witli sed 27tanature of Contract for deed Vendee(s) ( (Buyers) if an Witnessed Signature and Title of Public Officer: of County, Minnesota (Signature and Title or Position of Local Author ay) For Individual or HusbandlWife: State of — Q_ ) SS Lyf/I�Z2f �CiY�� County of ) The foregoing instrument was acknowled ed hef. me this day of , PQa� ulr, by (Print or type exact saine. name(s) with marital status or identity as on )urge 1.) Wahow TANYA MARIE WAG1\IER " Signal o caar y Public Notary Public C'ommissioaEx tres C State of Minnesota P EO �es January 31, 2014 State of ) ) SS County of ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 , by (Print ort)pe e.WC1 smtu mmhe(s) With marital s$UMU ar identity as oil edge 1.) Signature of ovary Public Commission Expires _ For Individual or Husband/Wife: State of ) ) SS County of ) The foregoing instrument was acknmw ]edged before me this day of , 19 , by (Print or n7re exact shoe name ,%) with marital status or identity as on page 1.) Signature of Notary Public Commission Expires _ Minnesota Department of Agriculture 625 K Roben Si St. Paul, Minnesore 55155 -2538 612-201-6409 AG -008&9 -02 4!428106 For Public Officer State of ) SS County of ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by _ the (Print n(4me) (Title) For Corporation State of day of 19 , by of the {Loral Authority} Signeuure of Notary Public Commission Expires ) SS County of ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 by , its and its of a Corporation, on behalf of the Corporation. Signafre of Nomry Public Commission Expires For CpWorat-ion-: State of ) )SS County of } The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 , by its and its of , a Corporation, on behalf of the Corporation. For Partnership State of ) ) SS County of 1 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by _ partner o on behalf of the partnership. For Partnershi State of ) )SS County of ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by partner of on behalf of the partnership. Signature of Notanl Public Commission Expires day of 19 f a partnership. Signature of'Notnrq Public Commission Expires day of Signature gfNotw�� Public Commission Expires For Attorney-in-Fact: State of } )SS County of ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by , as attorney -in -fact on behalf of Signates e of Nrltan Public Commission Expires Minnesota Depairmenl of Agriculhure 625 N. Robert Sl. St_ pawl, htimreiniu 55155 -2538 612 - 201 -6369 I _, l9 , a partnership, 19 , AG- O0869 -02 4/428106 For Trustee or Personal Representative: State of ) ) SS County of ) The foregoing instrument iNas acknowledged before me this day of , 19 , , the of the Sigruttuse of 'Notaj� Public Commission Expires _ Minmota Department of AgricuRam 525 N. Robert St. Si. Paid_ Mimiesota 55155 -2538 612 - 201-66369 ACi-0 {1$69 -02 4/428106 ATTACHMENT A STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ) SS. AFFIDAVIT OF ELIGIBILITY being first duly sworn upon oath deposes and says as follows: 1, 1 am the of (Title or Position of Lotai Government) State of Minnesota, which unit of government exercises the planning and/or zoning authority for the land described herein, 2. This affidavit is being executed and submitted on behalf of the planning and /or zoning authority, 3. The tract of land in the county of r " ! A? l %��iJ, State of Minnesota, legally described as {inust be same as on page 1): Parcel identification number: f LEA l ^�, ��-- 0C r Homestea or Non - Homestead (Circle one} Legal Description: :54,0 I /41, o /-, is, as of jyr designated for exclusive long -term /agricultural use and in accordance with an agricultural land preservation plan adopted by C.Z L U.ift�C/YGt 4, on �. and is eligible for designation as an agriculturaI preserve as provided under the provisions of Minn. Stat., Section 40A.09 effective __ 4. This affidavit is submitted at the request of _`I 0_0t n—r' P1 �� 44:� �� (Applicant) for the purpose of making application far designation and creation of an agricultural preserve in accordance wit Minn. Stat., Chapter 40A. Dated Subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day of Segnantre of Nolan' Commission Expires 19 Signature: of _ (Title nr Pmririon of locaf Goverament) Minacsoia Department cf Agriculture AG- 01031 -02 625 N. Robert St. 4f28f2006 Si. Paul, MN 55155 -2538 Page ._.__.., of - 651 -201 -6369 ATTACHMENT B STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF ) SS AFFIDAVIT OF "AUTHORITY" being first duly swom upon oath deposes and says as follows: I am the of (Title - Position nfLocal Awhorimj State of Minnesota, which unit of government exercises the planning and zoning authority for the land described herein, and constitutes the "Authority" as that term is defined under Minn. Stat., Section 473H.02, Subd. 4, 2. This affidavit is being executed and submitted on behalf of the Authority. 3. The tract of land in the County of r� "'�7�� State of Minnesota, legally described as (must be .same as on page 1): Parcel identification number: J ��� � "�3 y0o omestea or Non- homestead Circle one) Legal Description, l�c z ,3 is, as of, _ 49' , dessanate,� r - -.. b .c- erm aerie ,ltural land and in accordance with a resolution adopted by the Authority on is certified and eligible for designation as an agricultural preserve as provided under me provisions of Minn. Stat., Section 473H.04, 4. This affidavit is submitted at the request of d_ h %I (Applicant) for the purpose of malting application for designation and creation of an agricultural preserve in accordance with Minn. Stat., Chapter 473H. Dated Signature: Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 19 Signal tre of Nf) 4a ' Public Commission Expires of (Title or Position Local Authority Minnesota Department of Agriculture 625 N. Robert St. AG- 00571 -02 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -2535 412 812006 551 -201 -6369 Agenda Item L A N D F 0 R M From Site to Finish 105 South Fifth Street, MEMORANDUM Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 DATE November 10, 2011 TO Dan Donahue ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . cc City Council, Planninq Commission FROM Kendra y , Lindahl City Planner ..................................................._.................................. ............................... RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 0 • • Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 www.landform.net Armbruster Topography and Wetland Waiver (city file no. 09 -011). An application has been received for a waiver from the topography and wetland requirements and was reviewed by the City Council on November 23, 2009. The City Council expressed concerns about the concept and directed the applicant to revise the concept plan. The applicant submitted a letter extending the review period until January 2012. This will allow the city time to complete the ordinance updates and allow the applicant additional time to explore their options for development /subdivision. 2. Ordinance Updates. The City is in the process of updating the subdivision ordinance, zoning ordinance and zoning map to implement the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. a. The zoning ordinance and zoning map updates were approved by the City Council on September 22nd b. The subdivision ordinance updates will be considered on November 21St c. The park dedication ordinance update was considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on October 6th and tabled until November 3rd to allow the parks planner time to respond to questions. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the draft with a few modifications and it is scheduled for Council review on November 21 St 3. Daryl and Lori Patricide Accessory Building Contract (city file no. 11 -006). The Patnodes requested that the City allow them to construct an addition onto an existing barn without approval of a CUP or Certificate of Compliance due the close of the construction season and need for the barn addition. The City and the Patnodes that allowed the Patnodes to begin construction on the barn with the condition that they submit a Certificate of Compliance for City approval upon adoption of the new Zoning Ordinance that will create the new process. 4. Custom Filtration Inc. Preliminary and Final Plat (city file no. 11 -008). The city received an application to combine the existing Custom Filtration lot with the outlot to the west. The plat is tentatively scheduled for Parks & Trails Commission review on November 15th, a rublic hearing at the Planning Commission on December 1 St and City Council review on December 19t . 5. Highland Bank Preliminary and Final Plat approval for "Highland Subdivision" at 10435 CR 19 (city file no. 11 -010). Highland Bank is requesting approval of a preliminary and final plat to subdivide the existing 60.56 -acre parcel into one 5 -acre lot with the existing home and one 54.19 -acre outlot. The applicant is not proposing any new development on the site at this time. The application was scheduled for a public hearing at the Planning Commission on November 3rd and City Council review is scheduled for November 21St 6. Anderson Ag Preserve Enrollment at 22090 Strehler Road (city file no. 11 -012). Sara Ann Anderson (Ridesport) has requested that the above - referenced property be enrolled in the Ag Landform'", SensiblyGreen$° and Site to Finish'" are service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 Preserve program. The subject property is currently enrolled in the Ag Preserve program but that designation will expire on November 26 h. The application is on the November 21St Council agenda. 7. Shamrock Golf Course Site Plan Amendment at 19625 Larkin Road (city file no. 11 -014). Mark Deziel has submitted an application for a site plan amendment for Shamrock Golf Course for a small storage building in the southern portion of the site. The application is currently incomplete, but is likely to be processed administratively as a site plan modification. 8. Development Rights Appeal from Howard Schmid at 21825 Oakdale (city file no. 11 -015). Howard Schmid has submitted a development rights appeal for his property on Oakdale. He has requested that this item be scheduled for the January 26, 2012 council meeting. 9. Assessment Ordinance (city file no. 11 -016). Staff is proposing an amendment to the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance to formalize the assessment process for delinquent land use fees as described on the land use application. This item is scheduled for a public hearing at the Planning Commission on December 1St and City Council review on December 19th. Also, there are a number of projects that have been approved, but are still not filed and closed out: 1. Corcoran Business Park (city file 06 -005). The City Council granted a one year extension to the final plat approval, which expired on April 12, 2011. Staff has spoken to the applicant and will be working to close out this project. 2. Kellys West Oaks (city file 07 -003). On August 9, 2007, the preliminary plat was approved by Res. 2007 -54. Res. 2008 -06 granted final plat approval with 7 findings and conditions on January 24, 2008, including a condition requiring vacation of an existing easement. The applicant requested and was granted a one year extension to the approvals. On February 10, 2011, the City Council approved an after - the -fact plat extension. The approvals now expire on November 1, 2011 unless the applicant has complied with all conditions of approval and recorded the final plat at Hennepin County. 3. Savoie Fields Final Plat (city file no. 07 -011). This two -lot subdivision was approved and received one extension that expired on January 28, 2011. The landowner has applied for an after - the -fact extension of the plat approvals. This item was approved by the City Council on July 28, 2011. The final plat approvals now expire on January 28, 2012. 4. Lions Park (city file 09 -001). The rezoning to PUD, PUD general plan and PUD final plan to formalize the existing land uses and allow seasonal outside motor vehicle storage was approved by the Council on August 27, 2009. The rezoning was effective on the date of approval. However, the applicant must initiate construction of the improvements PUD within one year after the effective date of the PUD rezoning by the City Council. Upon good cause shown, the City Council may extend the time for one additional year. If construction is not commenced within these time periods, any building permits issued for the PUD shall be void and the Planning Commission may initiate proceeding to rezone the subject property. The one year period ended on August 27, 2010. Staff visited the site on November 1St and noted that while some improvements have taken place, including permits along CR 101, the outside storage of vehicles was not initiated within the one year period and the approvals have expired for that portion of the project. Any work on site requires submittal of plans to the city for review and approval. 5. Northern Natural Gas Administrative Permit (city file 09 -009). An administrative permit for a meter station was approved and is under construction. The city will retain the escrow account until the project is completed to ensure that the project is completed according to the plans. The majority of the improvements and conditions of approval have been met. However, the landscaping has not yet been installed. Northern Natural Gas indicates that there are still connections that need to be made on site and landscaping cannot be installed until completed. City staff was notified that the landscaping was installed on site and conducted an inspection June 3, 2011. The landscaping and all other improvements were installed per City requirements. Staff will begin the project closeout process. 6. Park Place Storage Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Amendment (city file 10- 006). On September 23`d the City Council approved Resolution 2010 -36 approving the request with a MEMORANDUM number of conditions. The applicant is working to address those conditions. The approvals expired on September 23, 2011. 7. Satellite Industries Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment, Lot Consolidation and Easement Vacation (city file 10 -007). On September 23 d the City Council approved Resolutions 2010 -37, 2010 -38 and 2010 -39 approving the request with a number of conditions. The applicant has addressed those conditions and has submitted a building permit application and has begun site work. Staff inspected the site on October 12th and found that the major site improvements had been made, but there are several items that still have to be addressed. We have discussed these items with the landowner. The city has a financial guarantee in place to ensure completion. 8. Corcoran Wildlife Preserve (city file 10 -009). Preliminary plat (city file 06 -004) was approved on September 27, 2007 (Res. 2007 -72) with 8 findings and conditions. On September 23, 2010, the city council approved Resolution 2010 -40 approving the final plat. The applicant has 2 years to address all conditions of approval and record the final plat. The final plat approvals will expire on September 23, 2012 unless the applicant requests and is granted an extension. 9. Rocks N Blocks Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit (city file no. 10 -012). An application was received for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Amendment to continue operation of a business with outside storage at 20010 75th Avenue North. The application was approved by the City Council on June 23rd. This was approved as a way to correct a code enforcement issue. No work has been done on site to correct the code violations. The City Administrator sent a letter to the applicant on October 14th regarding the required code violation corrections. 10. Patnode Conditional Use Permit (city file no. 11 -004). An application was received for a Conditional Use Permit for living quarters accessory to an Agricultural use. This is the follow up to the wetland and topography waiver granted on January 27th (city file 11 -001). The application was approved by the City Council on June 23 d 11. Custom Filtration Inc. Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment (city file no. 11 -005). An application received for a site plan amendment and conditional use permit amendment for a building and parking lot expansion for the existing business at 7219 CR 116. The City Council approved the request on July 28, 2011. The landowner has submitted a building permit and will be starting construction this fall. 12. Steffan Svard Administrative Permit for expansion of a legal, non - conforming structure at 19604 Country Circle East (city file no. 11 -009). Mr. Svard submitted an application for approval of an administrative permit for expansion of a legal, non - conforming structure. The Administrative Permit was approved on September 26th and a building permit was issued. 13. City of Corcoran Site Plan Modification for Corcoran Shooting Range at 8200 County Road 116 (city file no. 11 -011). The Corcoran Police Department submitted a site plan modification for the shooting range. The site plan modification was administratively approved on October 17, 2011. 14. Schwab Certificate of Compliance for an Ag Building at 6255 Mohawk (city file 11 -013). A certificate of compliance has been submitted for an Ag Building on this property. If the application complies with the ordinance requirements in Section 1030 and Section 1070.065 of the Zoning Ordinance, the permit has been signed and issued to the applicant. MEMORANDUM 0 ►Vi 14 ►vi IQ:L10, I bill Ji NORTHLAND STRATEGIES Special Projects Group To: City of Corcoran From: Rusty Fifield and Tammy Omdal Date: November 15, 2011 Re: Funding Scenarios for Sewer and Water Improvements The purpose of this memorandum is to explain the funding scenarios for options under consideration for construction of sanitary sewer and improvements within the City. The project options and estimated costs were provided by Wenck Associates. Wenck has identified nine project options for the City to consider. The options consist of a base project (at an estimated cost of $2.8 million) and eight alternatives for expanding the scope of the improvements. The funding analysis focuses on the use of tax increment from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 (the "TIF District"). We have previously determined (in conjunction with legal counsel) that the City has the ability to use revenues from the TIF District for "eligible" project costs. (Costs outside of the Development District and not authorized by the TIF Plan cannot be paid with tax increment.) The funding analysis in this memo is based on the following assumptions: • The 2010 Annual Financial Report showed a tax increment fund ( #401) balance of $2,873,396 as of 12/31/10. • The City is scheduled to receive approximately $300,000 in tax increment revenue during 2011. • The TIF Plan authorizes collection of tax increment through the statutory maximum of 2013 (25 years. The analysis assumes potential tax increment revenues of $300,000 in 2012 and 2013. • After decertification of the TIF District, all remaining tax increment will be sent to the County for redistribution. (Hennepin County maintains the following settlement dates for redistribution of tax increment: July 5, December 2, and January 25. The County requires written notification 30- 45 days in advance of these payment dates.) The City will receive a pro -rata share of these funds based on the City share of the then current tax rate. This analysis assumes that the City will receive 32% of the excess increment. This money can be used for any legal purpose, including the water system payment to Maple Grove and utility start up costs. Northland Securities, Inc. 45 South 7th Street, Suite 2000, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Toll Free 1- 200 - 851 -2920 Main 612 - 851 -5900 www.northlandsecurities.com Member FINRA and SrPC Funding Scenarios for Proposed Public Improvements November 15, 2011 Page 2 Funding Analysis (Attachment) The nine project options appear in the table columns. The "Uses of Funds' section of the table details the components of each option. Three funding scenarios are shown for each project option. All funding scenarios provide sufficient money to pay for all project options. (Note: Additional review is required to verify if all project alternatives are TIF eligible — see below.) The variable in each scenario is the amount of excess tax increment and the amount returned to the City. These amounts are highlighted at the end of each scenario. The funding scenarios are based on the following: Scenario 1 assumes the TIF District is decertified at the end of 2012. With proper coordination with the County, the excess tax increment redistribution would be received in January 2013. Scenario 2 assumes the TIF District is decertified at the end of 2013. With proper coordination with the County, the excess tax increment redistribution would be received in January 2014. Scenario 3 also assumes decertification in 2013 and adds special assessments equal to 20% of the project cost. The use of special assessments reduces the costs paid by tax increment and increases the amount of excess tax increment. TIF Management Considerations Several factors related to the use of TIF District No.1 require additional discussion. Eligible Activities The TIF Plan authorizes the use of tax increments to pay for trunk sanitary sewer improvements. The 2003 Modifications added the following language to Article II, Section C(3) of the TIF Plan: "The existing downtown area is served by on -site wastewater treatment systems. These include drain fields, mounds, and holding tanks. These systems will need to be upgraded for future improvements and redevelopment. The Comprehensive Plan contemplates using a centralized collection system and conveying the wastewater to the MCES Elm Creek Interceptor in Maple Grove. " This Plan text and the related budgeted expenditures show that the City has been planning to use tax increment financing to pay for sanitary sewer improvements. As currently envisioned, the improvements create the capacity to serve property in the TIF District, but will not physically extend utilities into the TIF District. All of the identified alternatives or options are eligible for TIF funding provided that the improvements clearly and reasonably provide the capacity for serving properties in the TIF District. (The only exception being for the $300,000 payment to Maple Grove included in the base cost of the project.) System planning should determine future actions, if any, to make improvements within the TIF District. It would be advisable to amend the TIF Plan to include a description that matches the actual sanitary sewer and water improvements to be undertaken and how the improvements achieve the objectives of the TIF Plan. Funding Scenarios for Proposed Public Improvements November 15, 2011 Page 3 TIF District Budget The TIF Plan must include a budget that authorizes the expenditure of funds for the proposed improvements. The City cannot spend more on the improvements than is authorized by the budget without another modification, which would be subject to notice and public hearing procedures. The budget (both expenditures and revenues) should be modified when the design process produces accurate estimates of project costs. The budget should also be restated in categories used in annual reporting required by State Law. These adjustments can be finalized by a simple resolution, assuming that the overall budgetary figures do not change. Development District As the City considers project alternatives, it should be noted that tax increments can be spent outside of the TIF District, but need to within the Development District. This requirement has implications for the improvement project: • As noted above in this memorandum, the portion of the project from the Corcoran municipal boundary connecting to the Maple Grove water system cannot be paid with tax increments. This cost is estimated at $300,000. (Sanitary sewer costs outside of Corcoran will be paid by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services.) • The route alternatives may not be outside of the Development District. This situation can be corrected by (1) changing the alignment of the improvements to stay within the boundaries of the Development District, (2) extending the boundary of the Development District, or (3) using another source of payment (i.e., non -TIF) to pay for this portion of the improvements. Next Steps No immediate action is needed to use monies in TIF District No.1 to prepare for the construction of sanitary sewer and water improvements. From our perspective, the next steps in the process are as listed below. Northland is available to assist the City with these next steps. 1. Establish the scope of the preferred improvement project. 2. Create a finance plan for the preferred project. 3. Prepare modifications to the TIF Plan and undertake the process to adopt the modifications. 4. Undertake other actions needed to implement the finance plan. LA Z O H O H U W O OC � a 3 O u 3 O c N a � o m O c U O O O T 0 V y O a` O T m c Q 0 m m w w p o 7 ate` l7 ZI o r•I w l.! ••I O V 0 o O w O m w uoj o \ O i \ O w W N YO a aO. \ O O p aO. o- O \ w V N E .� O O 0 N p N C N N LL N N V V m T o T } }> o N N v k k E E E J C W w '� - E E E J C W w C a U '6 Y a i O O y R O O O ? w ii O O O O j w LL O >> U l7 D u3. v c c c w vEi n a p c N o 'O ti ry m v �n io t` w w w w w w w vNwi u �l w v w v LL m o o a o m v v v LL m o o a LL a a a a a a a N m o t: a m m m m o- n o d Oci m m m m m fl- o 0 4m h ro Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O LL Z rn H "� H H H H Z in I- " O: � F rn rn m H > ^ O � w w a O � O G w o p w N w 0 0 0 0 0 O ZD G N N N N O j O o O N w -� E� O C C C C w N o C w w w w v_ E w E w LL m c ;g 0 Lol ac u 4 e II• Flu u Zr E Q o Z o E w 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 W" M O O O O M 0 0 0 0 tm O b b O O O O O O Lq Lq O O o o O p m o 0 m o c 0 O m m M m O n11 0 0 0 Ct TO m M m m 0 0 0 at lD m Oi � j fV W tV rl O O W vi ryj m m. O O 0 O O m C) m O O O O 0 0 0 0 m C) m O O O O O m C) O O O r 0 N a W m ^ m ry 14 Oc O b ti Oc m ID r ry�j M a 3 M N V m 'O �p M tO 0 0 0 0 0 to 'O yn tO 0 0 0 0 0 tO lO 0 0 0 c � o Vf m o o m o o o C m m M po m m o 0 0 o m 0 0 C o m m- m oo m o 0 0 0 o m m n m 0 0 0 0 n O h �, p o m m n °o °o o n °o °o o °m _ •� N V N a0 m M M nm� r N m W M m M M rmr� O h W M m M M Vl V1 O 1: _ N N N M rl N V .y N V N T w v x b N to O o 0 0 0 tO b^ tO -o 0 0 0 o -m b N 3 c °o °o °n o voi m °o °o °o m m M m 00 00 °o °o m e m 0 00 00 00 oM w ti p' V O O W 4�0 ybj n 0 0 O co ^ b^ n o 0 0 0 ^ ti V c N N N m n o m M m r O N Oct M m M m O M q W M m M m ut to OD b ON N N N m N R rl N ti c o w C :) J + + w 0 0 o O 0 0 O lO o 0 0 0 0 w �p nl m 0 0 o m tO o 0 0 0 o to "O Lh m 0 0 0 0 m tD o 0 0 0 0 to �p m 0 0 0 0 0 m + O J O to O O N M O C O p� M OO m C 0 0 0 O, m b O� m C 0 0 c n O h Ou '••� c C O W c n 0 0 o M n o 0 0 o n M o 0 0 o N O 3 O ri N m OO m m m n ti 'b W m m m m O N W m m m m - to N b LL V O F N N N M '..� N V rj N d' �j vc H o c o 0 0 0 o io 0 0 0 0 0 io ry 'o 0 0 0 0 o T m M 0 0 0 0 0 p O o C O 0 o o o m O o m c 0 o o m m M ') ^�' m O o 0 o m C C C o m m N m „i M m o 0 0 o O m m m m o 0 0 0 0 m M -w0 O o r-I N r o O O r V NI O O O O n R O n O O oo O W- m •a c N N N o m m M n M Oct m m m m O �O N Oct M m M M In ti W E w N V N m w L N u u O � .t+ O O O O �O O O O O O tD b M l0 O O O O O tO b t0 O o o C] O to b b J 0 0 O O 0 o O m o 0 m o C o c m m q cl m o 0 0 0 m O o 0 c m m ,y m m o o O o o m m ID m 0 0 0 0 W c N W 0 0 p V �o m o o r, o 0 o o M b m n m 4i m O O O O r, o 0 0 0 M m °i N - ,y C m o 0 0 0 W r, o 0 0 0 ,� w ?j 0 2 N N m W m M M n Oft Oct M m M M O W M m M M Vl 4A R N V .y N V N b c H o 0 0 0 0 �0 0 0 0 0 0 �o b b im o O O o o T"o b o 0 0 0 o io C 0 N 0 0 O ut o Vf m o o m o o O o m m M M p m o 0 0 o m c C 0 0 m m N mf Do � m o 0 0 0 o m m b m O c O o m N h N' N N O ao a M o 0 - 0 0 o o m n °0 of m O o 0 o r, o 0 0 0 M � °j �+ m o 0 0 0 lD O r, o 0 0 0- m `^ N` N 00 m M M n Op M M M M O W M m M M r" N n N V .y N V n! r 0 0 O l0 O O O O O ID �p l0 O O O O O tO �p n to O O O O O b b to O O O m 0 0 m o o O o m O, M r•,� p m 0 0 0 0 M C 0 0 C m c, N m 'n m 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 0 0 0 m „i .i N oo 0 0 N m o 0 n O O o O m n h'1 m o o n o n O O O O M n m m o 0 0 o N vi n O O O O ti H VN N N W m M M ^ N W m m M m C a M m m m 4n 'n m N N N m ,y` N V' rj N V tV d c 0 0 0 0 o o ko 0 0 0 0 0 ko k M m o o O m m yr m o o o m „� ^ io 0 0 0 0 0 v, m o 0 0 o m m n r1 O o 0 o m ,n N 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m o 0 0 0 o m rn 0 0 0 c v r", y� yy W N O N m o o r O O c O m n ~ ^ m o 0 0 c n 0 0 0 0 m r d' m o 0 0 0 o m n O o 0 0 N m ~ q 'e^ ,--! N ac m m M I� b M N Oct m m m m O m M b OO m m m m It 'I m b h Q 6 N ry ry M ,y N N N d N R in 0 m m w w p o 7 ate` l7 ZI o r•I w l.! ••I O V 0 o O w O m w uoj o \ O i \ O w W N YO a aO. \ O O p aO. o- O \ w V N E .� O O 0 N p N C N N LL N N V V m T o T } }> o N N v k k E E E J C W w '� - E E E J C W w C a U '6 Y a i O O y R O O O ? w ii O O O O j w LL O >> U l7 D u3. v c c c w vEi n a p c N o 'O ti ry m v �n io t` w w w w w w w vNwi u �l w v w v LL m o o a o m v v v LL m o o a LL a a a a a a a N m o t: a m m m m o- n o d Oci m m m m m fl- o 0 4m h ro Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O LL Z rn H "� H H H H Z in I- " O: � F rn rn m H > ^ O � w w a O � O G w o p w N w 0 0 0 0 0 O ZD G N N N N O j O o O N w -� E� O C C C C w N o C w w w w v_ E w E w LL m c ;g 0 Lol ac u 4 e II• Flu u Zr E Q o Z o E w DRAFT easibility Report Sewer and Water Utility Project Prepared for: The City of Corcoran, Minnesota November 2011 Wenck File #2294 -10 Prepared for: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 Feasibility Report Sewer and Water Utility Project November 2011 �Wenck FEASIBILITY REPORT for Sewer and Water Utility Project PREPARED FOR: City Council Members: PREPARED BY: November 2011 City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 Ken Guenthner, Mayor Roz Milbrandt George Gmach Tom Cossette Rich Asleson WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 -0249 Telephone: (763) 479 -4200 Facsimile: (763) 479 -4242 Wenck File #2294 -10 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: Kenton C. Torve, P.E. Registration No: 24807 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................. ..............................I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... ............................1 -1 2.0 SEWER ................................................................................................. ............................2 -1 2.1 Background ........................................................................... ............................... 2 -1 2.2 Sewer Routing ....................................................................... ............................... 2 -2 2.3 Sewer Flows, Service Areas, and Lift Stations ..................... ............................... 2 -3 2.4 Cost ....................................................................................... ............................... 2 -3 3.0 WATER ............................................................................................. ............................... 3 -1 3.1 Background .............................................................................. ............................3 -1 3.2 Water Main Routing ............................................................. ............................... 3 -1 3.3 Cost ....................................................................................... ............................... 3 -2 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................ ............................4 -1 4.1 Alternate 1 —Under CR 116 ................................................. ............................... 4 -1 4.2 Alternate 2 — Lions Park Under CR 10 ................................. ............................... 4 -1 4.3 Alternate 3 — City Hall Extension ......................................... ............................... 4 -2 4.4 Alternate 4 — Water Booster Station ..................................... ............................... 4 -2 4.5 Alternate 5 — Forcemain to Schendel .................................... ............................... 4 -3 4.6 Alternate 6 — Gravity to Schendel ......................................... ............................... 4 -3 4.7 Alternate 7 — Downtown Lift Station .................................... ............................... 4 -4 4.8 Summary of Alternates ......................................................... ............................... 4 -4 5.0 FINANCING ..................................................................................... ............................... 5 -1 5.1 General ..................................................................................... ............................5 -1 5.2 Assessment Method .............................................................. ............................... 5 -2 5.3 Cost Apportionment .............................................................. ............................... 5 -2 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND SCHEDULE ................................. ............................... 6 -1 TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc Table of Contents (Cont.) TABLES 1 Preliminary Cost Estimate for Gravity Trunk Sewer 2 Preliminary Cost Estimate for Trunk Water Main FIGURES Project Route and Assessed Parcels Plan and Profile 1: STA 00 +00 to STA 15 +00 Plan and Profile 2: STA 15 +00 to STA 38 +00 Plan and Profile 3: STA 38 +00 to STA 65 +69 Plan and Profile 4: South Water Line APPENDIX A Trunk Water and Sewer from Comprehensive Sewer Plan B Figures and Cost Tables for Alternates C Preliminary Assessment Roll T: \2294 - Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts)\Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc Executive Summary This Feasibility Report was authorized at the August 28, 2011, meeting and has been prepared in DRAFT form for discussion of costs, financing, and alternatives. In summary, the project extends water and sewer from the Maple Grove border to the "downtown" area by terminating in public ROW on CR 116 east of St. Thomas Church. The gravity sewer and water are consistent with the 2005 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Plan and Trunk Water Plans for the City. The City is coordinating with MCES, which will construct a lift station north of CR 10 as the collection and monitoring point for the southeast district. The capacity (peak) is approximately 2.0 MGD with an average flow of approximately 600,000 gpd and is part of the Elm Creek Interceptor of the MCES system. The sewer will consist of a 15 -inch diameter gravity system and provide ultimate service capacity to the "downtown" area. Development progress is unknown at this time; therefore, the project was initiated to expose a large amount of undeveloped land while also constructing the permanent system. Costs as detailed in the report are as follows: • Sewer $1,110,000 • Water $870,000 (includes the $300,000 Maple Grove connection fee) • Total Base Project Estimate $1,680,000 • All Alternatives Cost: $3,231,000 The proposed assessed amount for discussion is $310,000 for the Maple Grove connection fee of $300,000 and $10,000 of legal, coordination, and administration costs. This equals a per -acre charge being proposed at $1,441.51 per developable acre (excludes National Wetland Inventory mapped area). TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc 1.0 Introduction This Engineer's Report has been prepared at the request of the City Council for the installation of trunk sewer and water services in the City of Corcoran. This report contains figures outlining the proposed improvements, itemized cost estimates, a proposed cost apportionment and a preliminary assessment roll. In February 2010 the Corcoran City Council authorized a scope of work that involved transportation, sewer and water for the CR 10 corridor. The 2010 schedule for this study was based on meeting a 2011 or 2012 construction window for the 2013 expiration of the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District, although funds can be expended after 2013. Sanitary sewer was planned to enter Corcoran south of Lions Park, maximizing gravity service to the City. However, negotiations with MCES and the developer of the Maple Grove property could not be concluded. Therefore the sewer connection was moved north (and shallower) which altered Corcoran's long -term plans. Water was also installed near Lions Park, and a joint powers agreement is necessary with Maple Grove. Transportation items were a component of the TIF study, since road alignment affects potential utility corridors for sewer and water. The CR 10 corridor at the Maple Grove border has been identified by the County as an area of "probable" congestion along CR10 (2030 volume of 25,500). This traffic volume is distributed north and south along CR 116, and west along CR 50 and CR 10. No transportation costs are presented in this report. In 2010 water main was also extended to just east of Lions Park within Maple Grove. This report now considers alternatives to extend sewer and water into Corcoran, exposing as many properties as possible to the benefits of public utilities. T: \2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc 2.0 Sewer 2.1 BACKGROUND The proposed sewer project is the culmination of years of planning for the trunk sewer system envisioned in the 2005 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan for the southeast area (shown in Appendix A). The sewer figure identifies assumed trunk sewer locations and sizes for full development of the service area. Average and peak sewer flows were developed in this plan using the developable land area and using estimated sewer flows specific to each type of planned land use. In the southeast sewer area, the trunk sewers in the western and eastern portions are separated from each other and flow to two separate discharge points to leave the southeast area. The trunk sewers in the western portion of the southeast area flow to a single point at sewer node 5E -14 (on CR 116 near City Hall), where a peak flow of 2.32 MGD would be pumped from a lift station northward along CR 116, into the northeast sewer area, and eventually to the MCES Elm Creek Interceptor via a connection from the northeast sewer area. The trunk sewers in the eastern portion of the southeast area (which is the area where the TIF sanitary sewer will be constructed) flow to a single point on the eastern boundary of Corcoran at sewer node 5E -21, reaching a peak flow of 2.29 MGD, which would flow to the Elm Creek Interceptor. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan had a similar sewer layout, with some expansion of sewer service area, particularly for the trunk system in the western portion of the southeast area (Appendix B). Under the 2030 Plan, the trunk sewers in the eastern portion of the southeast area flow to a single point at sewer node 5E -22 (south of CR 10), where a peak flow of 3.98 MGD would flow by gravity to a future 24 -inch 2 -1 T: \2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districtsffeasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc diameter sewer that would connect to the MCES Elm Creek Interceptor. This 24 -inch sewer would have maximized gravity sewer service to Corcoran; however, negotiations between MCES and the Maple Grove property could not be concluded. Ultimately, in 2010, a shallower (and smaller capacity) 15 -inch sewer pipe was constructed along CR 10 to a location approximately 500 feet from the Corcoran boundary. This 15 -inch sewer has an approximate peak sewer flow capacity of 2.1 MGD, which is roughly equal to the peak flow in the 2005 Plan but is only about half the peak flow in the 2030 Plan. In the long term, the differences between the 2005 Plan and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan will need to be reconciled with regard to development areas and densities, and with regard to the capacity of the existing 15 -inch sewer pipe that has already been constructed for connection to MCES. In the short term, the availability of the 15 -inch sewer allows for extending sewer service into Corcoran, with development beyond 2030 ultimately driving the sewer subwatershed routing. 2.2 SEWER ROUTING The TIF study reviewed four conceptual sanitary sewer alignments, with two routes following existing roadways to connect Maple Grove to the "downtown" intersection of CR 10 and CR 116. However, these routes were significantly impacted by topography. The ground elevation at the intersection of CR 10 and CR 116 is approximately 980 feet, suggesting a maximum sewer elevation of approximately 970 feet. However, ground elevations of over 1000 feet are encountered along both of these routes. This would result in sewer depths in the range of 30 to 40 feet, which is not considered feasible along the existing roadways. Hence, if existing roadways are to be followed, providing sewer service at the intersection of CR 10 and CR 116 will require installation of a city -owned sewage lift station to pump sewage to the Maple Grove connection point. 2 -2 T: \2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districtsffeasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc If the existing ROW available along roadways did not dictate the route, a long -term, "overland route" gravity option was available. Several discussions with MCES were held, which resulted in the agreement of a permanent lift station north of CR 10, near Goose Lake. (See Figure 1.) To provide sewer service along CR 116 to the north (and to City Hall), a second lift station owned by the City will be required to pump sewage to the MCES lift station. Among the potential sewage force main routes considered, the current gravity route has several advantages, including: • Permanent location of gravity system, • Green space construction allows property acquisition, • Avoids construction along County highways, and • Terminates on public property at CR116 that other downtown parcels could access. 2.3 SEWER FLOWS, SERVICE AREAS, AND LIFT STATIONS For the 2030 sewer layout (April 2009) the MCES lift station is envisioned as providing sewer service to some or all of subdistricts draining to SE -21 or a total peak flow of up to 2 MGD, which is the limit of available capacity at the Maple Grove connection point. Eventually, at some point in the future, a second connection to MCES will be north of City Hall, and wastewater will be directed to a second lift station at SE -14 for diversion northward. 2.4 COST Concept costs for the sewer layout are presented in Table 1. Costs include both the direct construction costs and also preliminary amounts for indirect costs, such as engineering, and City administrative /legal /appraisal costs. 2 -3 TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districtsffeasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc Permanent and temporary easements are needed along the sewer piping routes to provide adequate space for construction operations, and analysis by a certified appraiser is underway. Table 1 shows that the gravity route construction cost is $1,134,000. 2 -4 T: \2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districtsffeasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc 3.0 Water 3.1 BACKGROUND The draft trunk water system envisioned in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan generally extends along the east and south sides of Corcoran, with the 2030 service area as shown (note that this area encompasses all three of the trunk sewer areas, i.e., the northeast, southeast, and southwest sewer areas). The water figure in Appendix A identifies assumed trunk water main locations, as well as four potential water tower locations, four future well exploration areas and four potential connection points to the water distribution systems of neighboring communities. Using an average day per- capita demand of 150 GPD (which includes residential, commercial, industrial and public water demands) and the projected population with water service, the 2030 Comprehensive Plan estimated a total average day demand of 2.25 MGD in 2030. The corresponding 2030 maximum day demand was estimated at 5.25 MGD. Maple Grove has roughly 5 MGD in their water planning for Corcoran needs. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan suggests that the initial stages of water system development in the City of Corcoran will likely be through supply of water from Medina or Maple Grove. The focus of this analysis is a connection to an existing Maple Grove water supply located along CR 10 just east of the Lions Park. The water supply is a 24 -inch diameter water main that was constructed in 2010 to a location approximately 500 feet from the Corcoran boundary. 3.2 WATER MAIN ROUTING To route water main from the Maple Grove connection point to the downtown area two potential routes are available. First, the water main could follow the CR 10 right -of -way from the 3 -1 T: \2294 - Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc connection point all the way to the CR 116 intersection. Secondly, the water main could be parallel to the "overland" sewer route which has several advantages including: • Sharing of construction area, • Avoids County roads • Allows future connection to Maple Hill Estates, • Exposes the largest area of undeveloped land (i.e., north of CR 10), and • Closer to area that will have acceptable water pressure (i.e., north of CR 10), rather than higher - elevation areas (south of Larkin Road). The gravity route will plan for future connection to the water tower by extending the 24 -inch pipe to the north and utilizing a 12 -inch pipe to CR 116 beginning just past the MCES lift station. 3.3 COST Preliminary cost estimates for the water main layout are presented in Table 2. Costs include both the direct construction costs and also preliminary amounts for indirect costs, such as engineering and City administrative /legal costs. For the purpose of cost estimating, the water main was assumed to be installed using 15 feet of additional permanent easement and no temporary easement. Table 2 shows the construction cost is estimated at $968,000, including the $300,000 Maple Grove connection fee. 3 -2 T: \2294 - Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc 4.0 Alternatives The project has seven alternates that extend the project to public property and across public right -of -way and potentially add a water pressure booster station for the downtown area. These alternatives have been presented for Council consideration to allow the Council to bid these alternates with the project if deemed reasonable; the decision to award the alternates can be made in 2012. Additional engineering effort and cost will be required to bid the alternates. 4.1 ALTERNATE 1— UNDER CR 116 Alternate 1 (see Figure 1, Appendix B) involves extending sewer and water beneath County Road 116 to just inside the east St. Thomas Church property line. The project will allow for a future connection from a "downtown" lift station to service existing properties or future development to the west that will take advantage of the trunk sewer available along CR 116. Costs for this option are heavily burdened with additional land and utility difficulties, engineering and jacking mobilization. Estimates are: Sewer $46,200 Water $36,800 Soft Costs $25,000 Total $108,000 4.2 ALTERNATE 2 — LIONS PARK UNDER CR 10 Alternate 2 (see Figure 2, Appendix B) involves extending sewer and water beneath County Road 10 to the Lions Park property line. The project will allow for a future connection from a lift station to the south that services predominately future residential area. Costs for the alternative 4 -1 TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc are heavily burdened with additional land; Lions Park; gas main, cable, and other utility difficulties; engineering; and jacking mobilization. Estimates are: Sewer $100,000 Water $42,500 Soft Costs $40,000 Total $182,500 4.3 ALTERNATE 3 — CITY HALL EXTENSION Alternate 3 (see Figure 3, Appendix B) involves extending sewer and water toward City Hall along the east side of CR 116 to service City Hall and undeveloped City property south of City Hall. A potential private user of the pipe is undeveloped property west of CR 116 (Schendel), who would utilize this trunk sewer prior to the north connection being constructed. Burdened costs for the alternative are: Sewer $217,400 Water $121,500 Soft Costs $90,000 Easements $22,600 Total $431,500 4.4 ALTERNATE 4 — WATER BOOSTER STATION If development of land above the 1,000 -foot ground elevation is desired (south of CR 10 east of the downtown area), construction of a pressure booster station could be added at an approximate cost of $250,000. 4 -2 TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc 4.5 ALTERNATE 5 — FORCEMAIN TO SCHENDEL This alternate is shown in Figure 4 (Appendix B). The sewer is an 8 -inch forcemain north along CR 116, west along the northern limit of the St. Thomas Church property boundary to a termination point at the west limit of the St. Thomas property to the edge of the Schendel property. Estimated costs for this alternate are as follows: Sewer $91,000 Water $59,000 Soft Costs $40,000 Easements $25,000 Total $215,000 4.6 ALTERNATE 6 — GRAVITY TO SCHENDEL This alternate is shown in Appendix B, Figure 5. The sewer is a 12 -inch gravity service that continues west across St. Thomas Church property to the north side of the cemetery. The utilities terminate at the northern edge of the St. Thomas property. Estimated costs for this alternate are as follows: Sewer $76,000 Water $48,000 Soft Costs $40,000 Easements $24.000 Total $188,000 Note: Property costs may be significant due to "cross- country" route that splits the parcel. 4 -3 TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc 4.7 ALTERNATE 7 — DOWNTOWN LIFT STATION This alternate is shown in Appendix B, Figure 6. Under this alternate, sewer and water connect to the downtown area. A 12 -in gravity service would run along the St. Thomas Church property south near the intersection of CR10 and CRl 16. A lift station would be placed near the northwest lot corner of the property located on Commerce St. and Commerce St. West. From the lift station an 8 -inch forcemain would connect into the 12 -inch gravity line from the downtown area. Jacking under County Road 10 is shown in this alternate to access the downtown area. The downtown area would be served by either a City lift station or individual low pressure systems "networked" together and terminating at the nearest gravity connection point to avoid reconstruction of streets. Estimated costs for this alternate are as follows: Sewer $191,000 Water $ 75,000 Soft Costs $ 80,000 Easements $ 18,000 Total $364,000 4.8 SUMMARY OF ALTERNATES The total cost potential of the alternates is summarized below: Alternate 1 Under CR 116 $108,000 Alternate 2 Under CR 10 $182,500 Alternate 3 City Hall Extension $431,500 Alternate 4 Water Booster Station $250,000 Alternate 5 Forcemain to Schendel $215,000 Alternate 6 Gravity to Schendel $188,000 Alternate 7 Downtown Lift Station $364,000 4 -4 TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc Below is a summary of potential combinations of alternates in addition to the base project cost of $2,102,000. Under CR 116 Base Project Total $2,102,000 Alternate 1 — Under CR 116 $ 108,000 Total $2,210,000 Under CR 10 Base Project $2,102,000 Alternate 2 —Under CR 10 $ 182,500 Total $2,284,500 Downtown Lift Station Base Project $2,102,000 Alternate 1 — Under CR 116 $ 108,000 Alternate 7 — Downtown Lift Station $ 364,000 Total $2,574,000 Forcemain to Schendel Base Project $2,102,000 Alternate 1 — Under CR 116 $ 108,000 Alternate 5 — Forcemain to Schendel $ 215,000 Total $2,425,000 Under CR 10 + Downtown Lift Station Base Project $2,102,000 Alternate 2 — Under CR 10 $ 182,500 Alternate 7 — Downtown Lift Station $ 364,000 Total $2,648,500 Under CR 116 + Under CR 10 + Downtown Lift Station Base Project $2,102,000 Alternate 1 — Under CR 116 $ 108,000 Alternate 2 — Under CR 10 $ 182,500 Alternate 7 — Downtown Lift Station $ 364,000 Total $2,756,500 4 -5 T: \2294 - Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc City_ Hall Extension Base Project $2,102,000 Alternate 3 — City Hall Extension $ 431,500 Total $2,533,500 Maximum Buildout Base Project $2,102,000 Alternate 1— Under CR 116 $ 108,000 Alternate 2 — Under CR 10 $ 182,500 Alternate 3 — City Hall Extension $ 431,500 Alternate 5 — Forcemain to Schendel $ 215,000 Alternate 7 — Downtown Lift Station $ 364,000 Total $3,403,000 Note: The pressure booster station (alternate 4) adds $250,000 to each project. 4 -6 TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc 5.0 Financing 5.1 GENERAL It is anticipated that the City will use tax increment financing (TIF) to pay for the majority of the project costs. It has been determined that tax increment funds from the City's Tax Increment Financing District #1 can be used to pay for costs related to improvements located within Corcoran. (The expenditures must also be for activities located within the City's Municipal Development District #1.) The City should have sufficient TIF funds to pay for eligible project costs. The 2010 Annual Financial Report showed a tax increment fund ( #401) balance of $2,873,396 as of 12/31/10. The City is scheduled to receive $300,000 in tax increment revenue during 2011. The Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District #1 will be amended to match the improvement project ordered by the City. Project costs not eligible for tax increment financing are proposed to be assessed. The proposed assessment roll is given in Appendix C and listed at $310,000. This includes a $300,000 connection fee with Maple Grove and $10,000 of legal and coordination costs. It is anticipated that the City will set and apply capital charges for the sewer and water systems. An area charge would be collected when land is platted. A connection charge would be collected with the building permit. Revenue from capital charges are not needed to pay for the construction of the project. The revenues will be used to pay for costs related to future expansion and improvement of the sewer and water systems. 5 -1 TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc The City will also establish enterprise funds for the new sewer and water utilities. User charges will be set and collected to produce revenues needed for ongoing operation and maintenance expense. 5.2 ASSESSMENT METHOD The proposed method of assessment for the project is on a per -acre basis. Figure 1 identifies the properties proposed for assessment for this project. Appendix C shows that 208.1 acres would be assessed an amount of $1,441.51 per acre. Future negotiations during development with trunk and area charges could take this assessed amount into account upon negotiation of the developer agreement. 5.3 COST APPORTIONMENT While the City has the authority to assess any project costs, it is recommended that the assessments be limited to those costs that will not be paid from tax increment. The City does not have another source of funding for these project costs. Assessing for costs paid with tax increments may be treated as the repayment of the tax increment and complicate the management of the TIF District. The capital charges discussed earlier are a more effective means of allocating costs to benefitting properties. This recommendation should be discussed by the City Council. The assessed cost would be distributed on a per -acre basis to the six properties shown in Figure 1. Key terms for the assessment include structure (level annual principal or level annual payment), number of years for repayment and interest rate. These terms will be set by the City Council prior to initiating the process to conduct a final assessment hearing. 5 -2 T: \2294 - Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc 6.0 Recommendations and Schedule All improvements addressed within this report are feasible from an engineering perspective and are consistent with the City's sewer and water plans necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, it is recommended that: • The City Council review the financing approach of assessing non -TIF eligible costs, • The City Council review and select Alternatives to be included in the project, • The City Council direct staff to finalize the report to move forward with the project. • If the proposed improvements are determined by the Council to be feasible and necessary, the City Council should approve this Engineer's Report at a future meeting by Resolution and call for an Improvement Hearing. Following the Improvement Hearing, and if the City so orders the project, the construction will begin in 2012. Assessments will be certified following construction and the formal assessment hearing process. See the following proposed schedule. Month Activity November Present DRAFT Feasibility Report January Hold Improvement Hearing and Authorize Plans and Specs January Authorize Bidding and Easement Offers March/April Easements Acquired May Begin Construction Post Construction Certify Assessments 6 -1 TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning (TIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Feasbility report revised 110111.doc Tables Table 1 Preliminary Cost Estimate for Gravity Trunk Sewer City of Corcoran Item to Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1. Mobilization & Demobilization Lump Sum 1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2. 15" Gravity Sanitary Sewer & MHs < 15 -ft deep Lineal Feet 2,232 $ 50 $ 111,600 3. 115 " Gravity Sanitary Sewer & MHs 15 -ft to 20 -ft deep Lineal Feet 1,527 $ 70 $ 106,890 4. 15" Gravity Sanitary Sewer & MHs 20 -ft to 25 -ft deep Lineal Feet 330 $ 90 $ 29,700 5. 15" Gravity Sanitary Sewer & MHs 25 -ft to 30 -ft deep Lineal Feet 1,518 $ 110 $ 166,980 6. 15" Gravity Sanitary Sewer & MHs 30 -ft to 35 -ft deep Lineal Feet 664 $ 130 $ 86,320 7. 15" Gravity Sanitary Sewer & MHs 35 -ft to 40 -ft deep Lineal Feet 295 $ 150 $ 44,250 8. MCES Pump Station (100% MCES cost) Lump Sum $ - 9. 12" Sanitary Sewer Force Main (from MCES Lift Station to Maple Grove - 100% MCES cost) Lineal Feet $ 10. Sanitary Sewer Force Main Air Release Valve (100% MCES cost) Lump Sum $ - 11. Clear and Grub Acre 1.4 $ 2,000 $ 2,789 12. Type 3 Wetland Restoration Acre 5.6 $ 1,600 $ 9,039 13. Anti-Seepage Collar Each 6 $ 700 $ 4,200 14. Seed and Mulch/Crop Acre 18.0 $ 1,100 $ 19,800 15. Linear Sediment Control Lineal Feet 7,000 $ 2 $ 14,000 16. Traffic Control (Cnty Rd 116, Maple Hill Road, Lion's Park Intersection) Lump Sum 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 17. Jacked 24" Steel Casing (Maple Hill Rd) Lineal Feet 50 $ 300 $ 15,000 18. Driveway Pavement Restoration (2 driveways on CR 10) Square Yard 100 $ 9 $ 900 19. Driveway Culverts with Aprons & Trash Guards Lineal Feet 60 $ 20 $ 1,200 20. Construction Contingency Lump Sum 1 $ 67,000 $ 67,000 Total Sanitary Sewer Construction: $ 735,000 Engineering /Administration/Legal for Sanitary Sewer Construction L Engineering Design Fees Lump Sum I $ 120,000 $ 120,000 2. TIF Study & Planning (70/30 split with water) Lump Sum 1 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 3. Construction Staking and Oversight Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 4. City Administration/Legal/Engr Support/Appraisals Lump Sum 1 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Total Engineering /Admin/Legal: $ 290,000 Easements Associated with Sanitary Sewer 1. I Perm Easement - 50 ft width I Acre 1 7.5 $ 8,000 1 $ 60,294 2. ITemin Easement - 80 ft width I Acre 1 12.1 $ 4,000 1 $ 48,235 Total Easements: $ 109,000 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER: $ 1,134,000 Easement cost will be updated with appraisal value TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning JIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Cost Estimate_091511 Table 2 Preliminary Cost Estimate for Trunk Water Main City of Corcoran Water Main Construction Cost Item to Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1. Mobilization & Demobilization Lump Sum 1 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 2. 24" PVC Water Main C905 Lineal Feet 1,577 $ 90 $ 141,930 3. 12" PVC Water Main (C900) Lineal Feet 1 6,162 $ 30 1 $ 184,860 4. 24" Butterfly Valve & Box Each 1 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 5. 12" Gate Valve & Box Each 2 $ 2,500 $ 5,000 6. Hydrant (incl. 6" gate valve and 5LF of 6" hydrant lead ) Each 5 $ 4,000 $ 20,000 7. Ductile Iron Fittings Pound 13,500 $ 3 $ 40,500 8. Clear and Grub assume included with gravity sewer Acre $ - 9. Type 3 Wetland Restoration (assume included with gravity sewer) Acre $ 10. Seed and Mulch (assume included with gravity sewer) Acre 0.0 $ 1,100 $ 11. Alfalfa Cover Crop assume included with gravity sewer Acre 0.0 $ 1,100 $ 12. Linear Sediment Control (assume included with gravity sewer Lineal Feet 0 $ 2 $ 13. Traffic Control (assume included with gravity sewer) Lump Sum 0 $ 500 $ - 14. Jacked 24" Steel Casing (Maple Hill Rd Lineal Feet 50 $ 300 $ 15,000 15. Driveway Pavement Restoration (assume included with gravity sewer) Square Yard 0 $ 9 $ - 16. Driveway Culverts with Aprons & Trash Guards (assume incl. w /sewer) Lineal Feet 0 $ 20 $ 17. Construction Contingency (10 %) Lump Sum I 1 $ 44,000 $ 44,000 Total Water Main Construction: $ 480,000 Engineering /Administration/Legal for Water Main Construction 1. Engineering Design Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 77,000 $ 77,000 2. TIF Study & Planning 70/30 split with sewer Lump Sum 1 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 3. Construction Staking and Oversight Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 4. City Administration / Legal Lump Sum 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Total Engineering /Admin/Legal: $ 157,000.00 Easements Associated with Water Main 1. I Perm Easement - additional 15 ft width Aere 2 7 S x.000 k 21.320 Total Easements: S 21,000.00 Construction Project Subtotal $ 658,000.00 Maple Grove Agreement Cost $ 300,000.00 Coordination, legal, admin $ 10,000.00 TOTAL WATER MAIN: $ 968,000.00 Easement cost will be updated with appraisal value TA2294- Corcoran \10 -Sewer and Water Planning JIF Districts) \Feasibility report\november report\Cost Estimate_091511 Figures _ 1AA A a a I a I1 11 III 11 I 1111( 1 A I fAXLI 25'II9F -23-14-M) „i,Ul 11 11 u111, \ PROPOSED 24'x72" REDUCER I + DW. N9.9893151 AT STA. 4+04 PROPOSED 6162 L.F. ppvCPC900 WATEtMAIN24" t2" PVC C900 WATERIIIAIN 11 /T RACER WIRE >J /TRACER WIRE I -dl�f 11li1 \F \, yII'1 MH a4� - - - - - _ — — - - X40• -, / , / - - C 4D• a f -. O— MR-\a2 O � PROPOSED 500 L,F aD -{i- -- - -- -- - -�i- +a A- 15 1 10 PVC SOR 35. % _ - _ _ I[+ M [" 0 \ 00.41% - -- - --- --- -- ---- / PROPOSED 254 L . F . I+ " \ 15" PVC SDR 35 a 0.41X PROPOSED 500 L.F. PROPOSED 126 L F / \\� PROPOSED 457 L.F.. \ \ \ \ \ \\ I \ 15' PVC SOR 35 W 0.41% 15' PVC SDR 35 / /l. 9 FRANCIIS N WWS FAN L PiSN ` TAX 10, 25.119.23- ))'EEEI O n"J + CERTIFICATE N0. 10)7215 \ I V c� w 1 970 z zo 960 a W 950 J W 970( --r 15+00 PROPOSED 6162 L.F. 12" PVC C900 WATERMAIN W /TRACER WIRE 110" OFFSET FROM SAN. MH #3 SWR.) RIM = 952.45 MH #4 INV.= 935.62 RIM = 945.56 INV.= 937.68 - - - PROPOSED 500 L.F. 15 PROPOSED 457 L.F. PVC SOR 35 c+ 0.41% 15" PVC SDR 35 c+ 0.41% M am+ F- M N .- 14+00 13 +00 12 +00 11 +00 10 +00 M �m NOD 9+00 MH #2 RIM= 944.76 INV.= 934.57 0 0.41% SDR' S N1 9 R23+ I I \ EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED 500 L.F. 15•' PV( ISED 254 L.F. 15" PVC - --a— - - SOR 35 @ 0.41% PROPOSED 24 "x12" REDUCER - AT STA. 4+04 .T r + VItD 8+00 7+00 6+00 5+00 STATIONING IN FEET 126 L.F. U 15'• PvC U PROPOSED 404 L.F. 24" SOR 35 920 PVC C900 WATERMAIN a N @ 0.41% d O W /TRACER WIRE + VIA Tn0 910 4+00 3+00 2+00 1+00 0+00 VERTICAL EXAGGERATION = 5x SCALE IN FE" 0 190 290 LEGEND EXISTING CONTOURS - — - — PROPERTY LINE — - — EASEMENT LINE — [— FENCE LINE UNDERGROUND GAS LINE — a — OVERHEAD POWER UNDERGROUND POWER — +— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE '• — UNDERGROUND CABLE TV 41 PROPOSED MANHOLE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE I -1 -1 PROPOSED WATERMAIN - - - - PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT - - - PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT I HERE9T CERTIFT THAT THIS RAM. ST•LCIFICATIM. SMDPEKRVISIM M TTHAATT 10T MEMy LIIaNSE IRECf PRWESSIOMLL EKIREER HOER THE LAK W THE STATE W MIMLSOTA. .1.1 NAME SlfauT9RE DATE EICEHSE Q i 0 O O LAJ In J LI_ a 0 1- a u) O N Z O rc _O m o_ W _ O a a y (n O z io 0 1- a a � aJJ r 0W th Z Z crZ O� U 3 O zd to N }O )- H � UO H Q V) a o0 orn as n a'� �.4 U rn M m� U Z T: 'a EL ro o° 3 u u u e •- Y C•pN YOd NYC IWJWAdO3 w METROPOLITAN 970 4 COUNCIL LIFT STATION ? RIM= 945.00 INV. = 922.00 960 zo MH #1 RIM = 942.27 950 > INV.= 932.52 940 SDR 35 m 0.41% _ - 126 L.F. U 15'• PvC U PROPOSED 404 L.F. 24" SOR 35 920 PVC C900 WATERMAIN a N @ 0.41% d O W /TRACER WIRE + VIA Tn0 910 4+00 3+00 2+00 1+00 0+00 VERTICAL EXAGGERATION = 5x SCALE IN FE" 0 190 290 LEGEND EXISTING CONTOURS - — - — PROPERTY LINE — - — EASEMENT LINE — [— FENCE LINE UNDERGROUND GAS LINE — a — OVERHEAD POWER UNDERGROUND POWER — +— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE '• — UNDERGROUND CABLE TV 41 PROPOSED MANHOLE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE I -1 -1 PROPOSED WATERMAIN - - - - PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT - - - PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT I HERE9T CERTIFT THAT THIS RAM. ST•LCIFICATIM. SMDPEKRVISIM M TTHAATT 10T MEMy LIIaNSE IRECf PRWESSIOMLL EKIREER HOER THE LAK W THE STATE W MIMLSOTA. .1.1 NAME SlfauT9RE DATE EICEHSE Q i 0 O O LAJ In J LI_ a 0 1- a u) O N Z O rc _O m o_ W _ O a a y (n O z io 0 1- a a � aJJ r 0W th Z Z crZ O� U 3 O zd to N }O )- H � UO H Q V) a o0 orn as n a'� �.4 U rn M m� U Z T: 'a EL ro o° 3 u u u e •- Y C•pN YOd NYC IWJWAdO3 nl I I x ZI II I w v I�JI� sl EXISTING MAPLE HILL ESTATES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MAPLE HILL ESTATES 2ND IWRI BROCE B NAr ESTATES m . TAX 10, 24.119.13.43.0015 CERTIFICATE NO. 856815 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 6162 L.F. WITH GATE VALVE 12" PVC C900 WATERMAIN- ----------- w /TRACER WIRE - - — - L—1 I 13 l M __ a9 �- '�— I _ _p— — — -O_ — 9 I.I m w a�.....�.R�� I� 11 - - - -- - T4:Rp LUTNRAN0Ci0MCH 118 \ a 25.119.23.21.0006 I I 1 :. N0. 6775M = I PROPOSED 500 L.F. ¢I II 15" PVC SDR 35 W 0.41% I o I LOT 2 III II � II PROPOSED 10 L.F. 6" PVC SOR 26 STUB _OUT FOR FUTURE CONNECTION TO MAPLE HILL ESTATES PROPOSED GATE VALVE - PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WITH GATE VALVE N SCALE IN PEST 0 100 200 'I II I I ,I II I PROPOSED 20 L.F. 4" PVC SDR 26 STUB -OUT FOR FUTURE CONNECTION I� FROM MAPLE HILL ESTATES II /— PROPOSED GATE VALVE LEGEND EXISTING CONTOURS - — - — PROPERTY LINE — - — EASEMENT LINE —x— FENCE LINE UNDERGROUND GAS LINE a — OVERHEAD POWER w — UNDERGROUND POWER — �— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE x — y,_—rt _�_ —_ - F�� MH 95 .p- - - C- - _�- 25 - C MH trT °°— — — _O_ -G°— r1 G MH p6 i + ` 1 N + 40' -m m + N— _—- N�— �.•�\ \-- \.N__ —_ —� ,\ —\ - - -r - -- � _'1 % 'N UNDERGROUND CABLE TV • PROPOSED MANHOLE ) ---- *----+ PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE I— I —I PROPOSED WATERMAIN - - - - PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT - - - PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT (} PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ® PROPOSED GATE VALVE \ \ w \ // j . 7(Pk('i�OS��i>• �t� L \.F. 1 6\ \ I 1 I I i •N n `• PROPOSED 500 L.F. / \\ \\ ` \� t 4 \ -J"L,� �/ / / /yf511PVC /$pRt26�W001% 1. °° 1' I 1 \\ `jvp IS- PVC SDR 35 0 0.4T7L \1 I Llrr! J o / /�. \ • \ Now cNASPO 5 rm®rM 1 I I °o. . \ TAX 10+ 25 S .119 23.12.0002 PROPOSED 500 L.F. \ CERTIFICATE W. 781785 ' O 15" PVC SDR 26 a 0.41% - 7 CHASTEK FARM tee\ NmaF '� r FRANCI6 M 5.11 FAR 1 PI1 TAX TI CATE N . 11178001 ld CERTIFICATE N0. I017215 " / /r,. . • X10 �� tl PROPOSED 451 L.F. 15" PVC SDR 26 W 0.41% I II IIII II II11'.. \ 11 lilt lilt M\ k I I 1 I I I I I I I II I11111111 11 • IRxEREREBpaN LENS I PKPAREOTBYSW (A UNOEKI NYC01NI S1 EBVISIN " IRA' I AN A Our LICENSED S ESSIN ENCIKER UNDER ERE LARS V THE PRINT RATE —NATURE OATE LICENSE a 0 �a 0 Y U � 3 z ' o w 3 K o O O 00 LJI ) J Q 0 - O In CC D_ O .6 ~ N ao J Q � � w N o z O F- a J F- V1 LU w 3 w V) } a a V1 a r O � VI Ow U z z om. U lT_ O(r }O r U Of UO o° N� ^n V Y M m� v� U z oa° 'a O G �o s u u u c � 4 IT C- od0 p OBC WCY C VGA C AB> IT — yH010Xd00 w 990 --------------> ---------------° _.- ------------------------------. ------------------------ 990 MH RIM--969.37 MH a5 980 - - - - -� - - - - -- ;--- - - - - -. .--- ;-------- --- - - - - -; -- - - - - - - - - - - -- ' -- NF.= 94f. i3-- -- -iRIM= 972. 24 --- ------- ------- 980 ,-- , � — :INV.= 939.56 — � MH #8 RIM= 961.34 ---- - - - - -- ------ --- - - - - -- ----------------------------- ; - - - - -- ' -- - - - - -- - -- - - - -�- ` - - - -- 970 z970 z _ 0 960 _ _ INV. = 945.65 _ — __ _ = 9 - HIV. - =943 �59 — - ' / EXISTING GRADE E i PROPOSED ,6162 L.F. ------- - - - - -- r� - 12" PVC 0900- WATERFiA CN- _ - - _ -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - Z� T -- \ -- 960 zo __ _ - _ M t 10 OFF�ET SAN. i FROM ' W 950 PROPOSED 500 L.F. t5" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.417. PROPOSED 500 L.F. 15" PVC SdR 35 @ 0.41% _ y _ _ SWR 1 _ - � \ ` 95 J J w - - - - PROPOSED 472 L.F. 15" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.41% PROPOSED 457 L.F. � w 940 ------- - - - - --..____. PROPOSED 500 L.F. 15" PVC SOR 26 @ 0.4t7. 15" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.41Y. 940 930 oN __ __. ___. N o 0 °+ 930 F+ F +' F+ 920 NM NN NN ✓1� 920 38 +00 37 +00 36 +00 35 +00 34 +00 33 +00 32 +00 31 +00 30 +00 29 +00 28 +00 27 +00 26 +00 25 +00 24 +00 23 +00 22 +00 21 +00 20 +00 19 +00 18 +00 17 +00 t6 +00 15 +00 STATIONING IN FEET VERTICAL EXAGGERATION = 5x IRxEREREBpaN LENS I PKPAREOTBYSW (A UNOEKI NYC01NI S1 EBVISIN " IRA' I AN A Our LICENSED S ESSIN ENCIKER UNDER ERE LARS V THE PRINT RATE —NATURE OATE LICENSE a 0 �a 0 Y U � 3 z ' o w 3 K o O O 00 LJI ) J Q 0 - O In CC D_ O .6 ~ N ao J Q � � w N o z O F- a J F- V1 LU w 3 w V) } a a V1 a r O � VI Ow U z z om. U lT_ O(r }O r U Of UO o° N� ^n V Y M m� v� U z oa° 'a O G �o s u u u c � 4 IT C- od0 p OBC WCY C VGA C AB> IT — yH010Xd00 N SCALE IN iEET 0 100 200 LEGEND EXISTING CONTOURS - — - — PROPERTY LINE — - — EASEMENT LINE —x— FENCE LINE UNDERGROUND GAS LINE a — OVERHEAD POWER w — UNDERGROUND POWER — +— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 1. UNDERGROUND CABLE TV • PROPOSED MANHOLE ) ---- *---+ PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE I— I —I PROPOSED WATERMAIN - - - - PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT - - - PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT (} PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ® PROPOSED GATE VALVE 1 4 �.� \11 \_�• - ;\ \,_ - __,\ \ 1 \ \ \��`,. \, - 1/2 �F R23R I THE SW S 1`� \➢``_ \ \'' • \• \ \::��1\,II; , T1 9 nloliarF .E,l' T ION 24 GORGOrAN1°ANOIELC` SEC TAX 10+ 24 119 23 31 0002 \ \ \ \ CERTIFICATE NO. 1111027 PROPOSED BL IND FLANGE PROPOSED FIRE JYDRAANT -�° -' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1� \ \ \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ � PROPOSED 6162 L.F. 12" I I I \ I I \ \ \ / / w / GATE VALVE \ \ \ \ \ '� PROPOSED kIRRE \- N1�URAiiT \ \ \ ' PROPOSED 93 L.F� / 1 — pTElvpL7VE\ \ MITRACER wITRERMAIN wRGATEEVALVEE HYDRANT 15" PVC SDR 26 1 °d o Vo ,1,a 1 - — — -_ �� _ 7"Ir - —F - - — — 1 - --/- - —�- \- — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - — — a 0.34X \ °, sP1� +v- - - -II- - - - -' - - - - - - - - - L 4p• ''/ 771 7 l ^ — 1 \ W wl I \ MH Al l wm min sR•10•irE - - - - - - /I I I I I d Ei . d 4 , - - .d- - + \ n - 4D' d MH p15 VR V — - ITT PROPOSED 500 L.F. 15" PvC SDR 26 I / 1 PROPOSED 500 L.F. 15° PVC SDR 25 I➢ t5" PROPOSED 500 PVC SDR 26 L.F. II PROPOSED 500 L.F. - 15" PVC SDR 26 — S 0.34% @ 0.34% 0 0.34% Ir o 0.34% — h-, 15" I�I PVC SOR 26 O 0.34X s� ay Now a Famlerly. I " Now or Formerly GREG EBERT GREG E.p c0i 99 g �i➢ GOOD SHEPNERO LOTNERAN CM.WCN TAX 10+ 25.119.23.21.0011 CERTIFICATE. NO. 11211% O TAX 10+ 25.119.23.22 MI �= Ipl�ll<= TAX 10+ 25 119 13'21 0006 OOC. NO. 6775800 - - {•r - -p- 'd- - / — - ITT n �I MH a12 I➢ jq _ — — I I PROPOSED 284 L.F. W 4 PROPOSED 205 L.F. 15" PVC SOR 26 — h-, 15" I�I PVC SOR 26 O 0.34X s� ay Plow Or Formerly 9 0.34 % " Now or Formerly GREG EBERT O c0i 99 g �i➢ GOOD SHEPNERO LOTNERAN CM.WCN TAX 10+ 25.119.23.21.0011 CERTIFICATE. NO. 11211% O �= Ipl�ll<= TAX 10+ 25 119 13'21 0006 OOC. NO. 6775800 PROPOSED 168 L.F. 15" PvC SDR 26 MH tt3 a 0.36% IIr— {•r OMH - o- - o C I � W' W vi I I� �I I➢ jq F I f� 1 I I 12" PVC C900 WATERMAIN W /TRACER WIRE I�I {•r OMH - o- - o C 1- BID I ➢ " PROPOSED 3 1110 500 L.F. 15" I➢ 90.41% 1=1 w a s f� 1 I I 940 .a .a _ _ m.. _ --'- --... _ .� .a .L°o .ti .m .N 940 a+ a+ F a+ �+ a+ F+ F+ a+ Vfw N LO ' ' NTlT ' N N Vlv Vtv Vlv N M LIT 930 930 66 +00 65 +00 64 +00 63 +00 62 +00 61 +00 60 +00 59 +00 58 +00 57 +00 56 +00 55 +00 54 +00 53 +00 52 +00 51 +00 50 +00 49 +00 48 +00 47 +00 46 +00 45 +00 44 +00 43 +00 42 +00 41 +00 40 +00 39 +00 38 +00 STATIONING IN FEET VERTICAL EXAGGERATION =5x IRxEREREBpav LENS I CREPAREOTBYSW KIN. SP (A UNOEKI NYI COIRECT S19EBVISITIN " TxAT I w A Our LICENSED S ESSINI ENGINTER HOER TxE LARS V TxE PRINT RATE —NATURE OATE LICENSE a 0 0 K �a 0 Y U 3 3 0 Ln w� J Q Lr 0 N 0_ 0 o 03 r N a° J o 0- M a Q In N N o Z O r a a r J 00 V1 U Z Z_ D ? Om- 0: U Z w 0O V) O >- U } r Of Of a UO r a V1 o° Nrn ^n V U S sn m� v� U 2 .i o 'a t1 oa � o s u u u c � A14N C- od0 p OBC WCY VGA C AO> 3 mTa 1H710Ad07 PROPOSED 6162 L.F. 12" PVC C900 WATERMAIN W /TRACER WIRE (t0' OFFSET FROM SAN. c0i SWR ) MH tt3 MH tt6 MH tt7 MAPLE ILL ROAD 990 ----------------------- ---- -------------- ------..___.. _.. __.. ._____.___.__ - RIM= 979.55 -953 -- --------------- ----------------------- -MH a4 - - - - -- MH a5 RIM= 977.96 HIM= 981.56 RIM= 981.00 INV 949.59 - ---- H 778 MH 99 'TRIM INV ,_ 64 y _ M-g E %IS ING GRADE, '^ INV.= 950.28 ,_ = q INV. 9 9.28 M=974.59 OD 994. 980 MH tt1 _ _ — — — -- -- - - - � IN .96 - -- -- - - --- •= 9------------------ - - - - -- - - - - - -- — — -- - -- — - — — - - -� __ `V= 948.32 - - - - -- -7 980 w RIM= 968.00 INV.=957.00 RIM = 966.00 = == _ w 970 --- ---- ---- -- - - - - -- __INV.= 955.32 - _ _ _ -- cc�. _ - - - - - -- �- =- --- - - - - -- ---- - - -- -- - _ _c= ___ - - -- - - -. -- _ _ � - - -�- --- - - - - -- \ 9 7 O w w z � _- ,��c� _ _ PROPOSED _ z 0 960 - ° _ _ _ _ - - - �_ - - - - PROPOSED p F:- 9 "LP VC =_ °_'- _ -. ROPOSED ~168 960 0 _ _ _ _ - PROPOSED 500 L.F. 15" PVC SOR 26 @ 0.347. PROPOSED 500 L.F. 15" PVC SDR 26 0.34% t VC SDR 6 SDR 26 PROPOSED 284 L.F. L.F 15' PVC SDR 26 a PROPOSED 500 L.F. t5" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.347. PROPOSED 500 L.F. 15" PVC SDR 26@ 0.34% @ @ 0.34% @ 0.347. 15" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.347. @ 0.367. a J 950 ---- ---- 950 > W PROPOSED 500 L.F. 15" PVC SDFR 26 @ 0.41%—"0' .41% w 940 .a .a _ _ m.. _ --'- --... _ .� .a .L°o .ti .m .N 940 a+ a+ F a+ �+ a+ F+ F+ a+ Vfw N LO ' ' NTlT ' N N Vlv Vtv Vlv N M LIT 930 930 66 +00 65 +00 64 +00 63 +00 62 +00 61 +00 60 +00 59 +00 58 +00 57 +00 56 +00 55 +00 54 +00 53 +00 52 +00 51 +00 50 +00 49 +00 48 +00 47 +00 46 +00 45 +00 44 +00 43 +00 42 +00 41 +00 40 +00 39 +00 38 +00 STATIONING IN FEET VERTICAL EXAGGERATION =5x IRxEREREBpav LENS I CREPAREOTBYSW KIN. SP (A UNOEKI NYI COIRECT S19EBVISITIN " TxAT I w A Our LICENSED S ESSINI ENGINTER HOER TxE LARS V TxE PRINT RATE —NATURE OATE LICENSE a 0 0 K �a 0 Y U 3 3 0 Ln w� J Q Lr 0 N 0_ 0 o 03 r N a° J o 0- M a Q In N N o Z O r a a r J 00 V1 U Z Z_ D ? Om- 0: U Z w 0O V) O >- U } r Of Of a UO r a V1 o° Nrn ^n V U S sn m� v� U 2 .i o 'a t1 oa � o s u u u c � A14N C- od0 p OBC WCY VGA C AO> 3 mTa 1H710Ad07 PROPOSED BLIND FLANGE PROPOSED GATE VALVE I 1 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE --- I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C 1 TY OF CIXtCORAN 1 /1�1�81 �1 X10 1�1 pp�1 �1���1�1 O 1�1 o1�1 �IQ 1 N Y PROPOSED 1173 L.F. 24" PVC C900 WATERMAIN o W /TRACER WIRE / 'J / - - - - -- — - - - - - -- 1 Now or Form 00 led Q/ I I I CLARENCE J SCHOMMR / �J 1 TAX 10, 25-119-23-14-0001 ' I (\ \ 1 DOC. NO. 90931 iF 9 a �PO � �\ I / �� v ��� ,� /'bo sh' \ a 1 PROPOSED 1+DO 24 "x12" REDUCER I CONNECTION i T ' 1 \' 12" PVC C900 WATERMAIN 1 -1 I 24" PVC C900 WATERMAIN \ NV�ss6 MH #1 MH #2 L I 1/4 15" '\ / METROPOLITAN COUNCIL THE Iv I I SAN TAR SE ER ER / � LIFT STATION SE N ET I E 28 S 11 R23 ° I I 1 EE 990 ;990 i 980 r `980 w EXISTING GRADE I- L A W 1 970 - / Z \ _ X970 lw ? PROPOSED 1173 L.F. 24" / \ \ — _ _ i z Z 960 PV ACER C C900 W /TR WATERMAIN WIRE / / / 7 z x960 z / / _ - - - - W 950 J _ / / ' '950 > W PROPOSED GATE J W 940 _ _ / VALVE AND BLIND _- __�� FLANGE F940 930 i �i930 � PROPOSED CONNECTION 920 24" PVC C900 WATERMAIN ^ p920 .o a+ i .+ NO N� E r9t0 9t0 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10 +00 11 +00 12 +00 STATIONING IN FEET VERTICAL EXAGGERATION = 5x SCALE IN SWIM E IED 2EE LEGEND EXISTING CONTOURS - — - — PROPERTY LINE — - — EASEMENT LINE x FENCE LINE ��- UNDERGROUND GAS LINE ou OVERHEAD POWER P UNDERGROUND POWER UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND CABLE TV • PROPOSED MANHOLE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE 1 -1 -1 PROPOSED WATERMAIN - - - - PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT - - - PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT • PROPOSED GATE VALVE I HEREBY CERTIST THAT THIS RAM. STN:CISICATIM. SMDPEHERVISIM � TTHAATHEI Br A MLTINLYlaNSE DIRECT M F SSIM & ERCINEER D R THE LAK W THE SLAT[ O NIMALSOTA. .1.1 RATE SlQAA,WE DATE LICENSE Q O N Z O V1 rc M n LAj W r W J Q Qtr W W V) 0. r �30N Z=ODi �a0 m V1 i'- y O z O io r a a r aJJ r 0W th Z z �z OX. 0_ U LAI L W L Ow. N }O } 1- 0: UO r V) a 0� as n a'� U rn N n m� UZ pp� YC c ' 'a a o 06 3 u u Y e - Y C•pN YOd »ym-Y NYC IWJW dO3 SHEET NO. 4 Appendix A - - - � R JFwl I I �-y' • SE -AF SE -AP, SE,AQ - _ CO SE -AS • // { a SEAR 4 -I i r: �- 5E -32 SE -AA' SE -AO S E 31 i ? •- - - — - SE -C SE -13 :i S - , I � 11 i 5E -K L ✓ { SE -M SE -H SE -12 . T�,: • i SE -g'., «SE-10 , SE-F 8 SE -8' 5E -15 't 1I ' SE�E� oa - SE -G SEN % 5E -20 r i y t - $E- �$ "SES` 5E -16 SE 7 I sE -� 18" 5E -19, r, C SE 4 i SE•J ] I _ '.. SE -AM r ., - I I SE--O t .' SE -P $E- SE -T gE -4 I SE 18 1 i SF-9 SE -S I I SE -2 I ._...._. -... SEi77 SE -2.1 _SE -'y' SE 1' Fugure Connection To SE -U s SE -X SE -Y 5E- Elm Crreek Interceptor ' f I SE -W 5E -22 r - � i I ,ter rrsl�ra�rrrrtrt: 4 v ,M1, I r' SE -A - .. SE -AB - SE -AC SE -23 SE -AV SE-AA SE -24 5E -26 5E -28' 7 5E=30' SE 29 I J h SE -AG SE -Ak, SF -AI SE -AJ .. I 5E -25 SE-AE S. SE -Aq; h i r SW�11 CORCORAN 2030 Comprehensive Plan Trunk Sanitary Sewer SE Area Figure 26 0 Sewer Node • * - Forcemain —0— Gravity Sewer r ■ 1w, 1 MCES Interceptor = Sewer Subdistricts i%IV City Limit Parcel Base Map N W E S Feet 0 2000 r.r lI I � � I 1 1 1 j e I � I Bonestroo April 2009 i:\504�50408143\g1s \se sanitary map.mxd EIC E■ =EI A�-I AE /^■■m I Em ■lIEE�EEm IEMEI ME ENIEm■Itlllll=a am EE�E■ =I■MI@ ME N �I I� SEMI ■ wll� E■ MIE I•I am a M r 109th Ave N J U tr C J o y r Soh Rush Meadow La 1 m SefLa E a in mom' am me. g� Meadow -Creek. Mei 1 JJ 1 "_..Tessrrmer -Rd 1 1 1 j 1 1 LU z j W W � I C7 0 1 U Gan !Julie ❑r � Rd x Cre. 0 1 F 1 m r 1 1 � m J � , m SCOTT LAK JUBERT J ` LAKE v j y>-oa 7' Lakeview Cir °c 1 A° A- �wwww ww■a ■ ■ ■ r ■ I ■ V&U E %Stated N d Hidden -Sunny r - Meister Rd ,Cain -P.l _ e,9ge Rd H ♦ NMI �C_o`try CirE 0 untryirRrw. ■ar■� rp tieg.Rd ■ - - u ]assel-L-a � i � ai S ■ Darcel_La tle 9,�pa ■ ` ■ 1 Ir ■ " - ■ j �,a�st,a�e ■ ■- J Hunters Ridge ■ mE - 'ataF ww■■■www�.w■� ■ly■■ —97th Ave�N J 'Patrick PI /Mystique Dr�r: i www � IC N Sc h tt F d 1 Sahutte-Rd " aa� LL /1 0 4� AugjAve 1 I 0 5th Ave c� �w ■s ■. ■�ww*��7 ■ ■ L:arkiy Ftd' c _ ■ Lo ■ Abilene ■ c � ■ e m ■ a 70th Ave N ■ r La ■ m O ■ ■ °`s ■ t Phi ■ o MORIN C LAKE p` I; Mn ,Wheel La l % {1I raww rair-N—A+alt++wr■mEE =EI MEN ■mIn= a I zm�IEm In my ION EIMa N^E ■nmi1■m I OMAN =I IM IExNiE!MT no 63rd ■ _Ark Rd ■ l °r ■ ■ of ■ 1 "�,,r�'iA ■ j ,w leas ■n Rd IE ,�. , 1 EY Draft Trunk Water System 2030 Comprehensive Plan N ,��Pr•E S 3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet PINK QPotential Water Tower Locations 0 Potential Supply Connections with Neighboring Communities Komi Future Trunk Watermain Future Well Exploration Areas ® 2030 Service Boundary l�EE7 City Limit Open Water Wetlands October 7, 2009 Bonestroo 1: 1504150408144 1GIS1ComPlan /Mapsltrunk water system.mxd •', ■� VSh ., CR_� 1 � �• 1j wwwwwwwft�w KEEL ' ■ j � 1 * jCOOK " LAKES ® I 63rd ■ _Ark Rd ■ l °r ■ ■ of ■ 1 "�,,r�'iA ■ j ,w leas ■n Rd IE ,�. , 1 EY Draft Trunk Water System 2030 Comprehensive Plan N ,��Pr•E S 3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet PINK QPotential Water Tower Locations 0 Potential Supply Connections with Neighboring Communities Komi Future Trunk Watermain Future Well Exploration Areas ® 2030 Service Boundary l�EE7 City Limit Open Water Wetlands October 7, 2009 Bonestroo 1: 1504150408144 1GIS1ComPlan /Mapsltrunk water system.mxd Appendix B Alternate 1 11iTMKe114f R City of Corcoran Sewer Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1 15" Gravity Sanitary Sewer & MH < 15 -ft deep Lineal Feet 110 $ 50 $ 5,500 2 Jacked 24" Steel Casing (CR 116) Lineal Feet 50 $ 300 $ 15,000 3. Linear Sediment Control (assume included with gravity sewer) LS 1 $ 500 $ 700 4. Parking Repair Lump Sum 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Total Sewer Pipe Construction: $ 21,200 CR 116 Jacking Mobilization,Traffic, and Utility Surcharge $ 25,000 Total Sewer $ 46,200 Water Main Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1. 12" PVC Water Main (C900) Lineal Feet 110 $ 30 $ 3,300 2. 12" Gate Valve & Box Each 1 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 3. Hydrant (incl. 6" gate valve and 5LF of 6" hydrant lead) Each 1 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 4. Anti - Seepage Collar Each $ 700 $ - 5. Jacked 24" Steel Casing (CR 116) Lineal Feet 50 $ 300 $ 15,000 6. 1 Construction Contingency (10 %) Lump Sum 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Total Water Main Construction: $ 26,800 CR 116 Jacking Mobilization, Traffic, and Utility Surcharge $ 10,000 Total Water $ 36,800 Fnninaarinrs /Arlminic�ra +inn /T arral fnr Qanitary Qo"rar (nnc�rnr +inn 1. Engineering Design Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 2. Construction Staking and Oversight Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 3. City Administration /LegaUPermitting with Lump Sum 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Total Engineering /Admin /Legal: $ 25,000 Total Alternate 1: $ 108,000 Alternate 2 Sewer and Water Under CR 10 to Lions Park City of Corcoran Sewer Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1 12" Sanitary Sewer Forcemain Lineal Feet 1,400 $ 50 $ 70,000 2 Jacked 24" Steel Casing (CR 10) Lineal Feet 50 $ 300 $ 15,000 3 Seed and Mulch (included in base project) Acre 0.0 $ 1,100 $ - 4. Lions Restoration Lump Sum 1 $ 5,000 1 $ 5,000 Total Sewer Pipe Construction: $ 90,000 CR 116 Jacking Mobilization, Traffic, and Utility Surcharge $ 10,000 Total Sewer $ 100,000 Water Main Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1. 12" PVC Water Main (C900) Lineal Feet 200 $ 30 $ 6,000 2. 12" Gate Valve & Box Each 1 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 3. Hydrant (incl. 6" gate valve and 5LF of 6" hydrant lead) Each 1 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 4. Anti- Seepage Collar Each $ 700 $ - 5. Jacked 24" Steel Casing (CR 116) Lineal Feet 50 $ 300 $ 15,000 6. Lions Restoration Lump Sum 1 $ 5,000 1 $ 5,000 Total Water Main Construction: $ 32,500 CR 116 Jacking Mobilization, Traffic, and Utility Surcharge $ 10,000 Total Water $ 42,500 F.nuineerinu /Administration /i,eual for Construction 1. Engineering Design Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2. Construction Staking and Oversight Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 3. City Administration / Legal /Permitting with County Lump Sum 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Total Engineering /Admin /Legal: $ 40,000 Total Alternate 2: $ 182,500 Alternate 3 Sewer and Water to City Hall City of Corcoran Sewer Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quanti ty Unit Cost Amount 1 4" Sanitary Sewer Forcemain trench Lineal Feet 2,372 $ 30.00 $ 71,160.00 2 4" Sanitary Sewer Directional Drill Lineal Feet 528 $ 30.00 $ 15,840.00 3 City Hall Pump Station with Electrical Lump Sum 1 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 4 Sanitary Sewer Forcemain Air Release Valve Lump Sum 6 $ 6,000.00 $ 36,000.00 5 Seed and Mulch Acre 4.0 $ 1,100 $ 4,400.00 6. lRestoration (driveways, etc.) Lump Sum 1 $ 5,000 1 $ 5,000 Total Sewer Pipe Construction: $ 207,400 CR 116 Traffic and Utility Surcharge $ 10,000 Total Sewer $ 217,400 Water Main Construction Cost Item Description Unit 1 Unit Cost Amount No. Construction Staking and Oversight Fees Lump Sum Quanti $ 20,000 $ 20,000 3. City Administration / Legal/Permitting with County Lump Sum ty $ 20,000 $ 20,000 1. 12" PVC Water Main (C900) Lineal Feet 2,900 $ 30 $ 87,000 2. 12" Gate Valve & Box Each 1 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 3. Hydrant (incl. 6" gate valve and 51,17 of 6" Each 3 $ 4,000 $ 12,000 hydrant lead) 4. Construction Contingency (10 %) Lump Sum 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Total Water Main Construction: $ 111,500 CR 116 Traffic and Utility Surcharge $ 10,000 Total Water $ 121,500 1. Engineering Design Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2. Construction Staking and Oversight Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 3. City Administration / Legal/Permitting with County Lump Sum 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Total Engineering /Admin /Legal: $ 90,000 Easements 1. Perm Easement - 30 ft width Acre 2.0 $ 8,000 $ 16,000 2. Temp Easement (trenched force main) - add'l 30 ft width Acre 1.7 $ 4,000 $ 6,600 Total Easements: $ 22,600 Total Alternate 3: $ 431,500 Alternate 5 Forcemain to Schendel City of Corcoran Sewer Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1 8" Sanitary Sewer Forcemain and Manholes Lineal Feet 1,550 $ 50 $ 78,000 2. Linear Sediment Control (assume included with gravity sewer) Lineal Feet 1,550 $ 2 $ 3,000 2 Seed and Mulch Acre 2.1 $ 1,100 $ 2,000 3. Construction Contingency (10 %) Lump Sum 1 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 Total Sewer Construction: $ 91,000 Water Main Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1. 12" PVC Water Main (C900) Lineal Feet 1,550 $ 30 $ 47,000 2. 12" Gate Valve & Box Each 1 $ 2,500 $ 3,000 3. Hydrant (incl. 6" gate valve and 5LF of 6" hydrantlead) Each 1 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 4. Anti - Seepage Collar Each 1 1 $ 700 $ - 5. Construction Contingency (10 %) Lump Sum I 1 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Total Water Main Construction: $ 59,000 Fnuineerin ¢ /Adminictrntion[t,eual for Constriction 1. Engineering Design Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2. Construction Staking and Oversight Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 8,000 $ 10,000 3. City Administration / Legal Lump Sum 1 $ 8,000 $ 10,000 Total Engineering /Admin/Legal: $ 40,000 Easements 1. Perm Easement (trenched forcemain sewer) - Acre 1.76 $ 8,000 $ 14,050 30 ft width 2. Temp Easement (trenched forcemain sewer) - Acre 1.07 $ 4,000 $ 4,270 add'I 30 ft width 3. Perm Easement (trenched water main along Acre 0.88 $ 8,000 $ 7,025 sewer route) - add'1 15 ft width 4. Temp Easement (trenched water main along Acre 0.0 $ 4,000 $ - sewer route) Total Easements: $ 25,000 Total Alternate 5: $ 215,000 Alternate 6 Gravity to Schendel City of Corcoran Sewer Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1 12" Gravity Sanitary Sewer & MHs < 15 -ft deep Lineal Feet 1,220 $ 50 $ 61,000 2. Linear Sediment Control Lineal Feet 1,220 $ 2 $ 2,000 3 Seed and Mulch Acre 5.0 $ 1,100 $ 600 4. 1 Construction Contingency (10 %) Lump Sum 1 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 Total Construction: $ 76,000 Water Main Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1. 12" PVC Water Main (C900) Lineal Feet 1,220 $ 30 $ 37,000 2. 12" Gate Valve & Box Each 1 $ 2,500 $ 3,000 3. Hydrant (incl. 6" gate valve and 5LF of 6" hydrant lead) Each 1 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 4. Anti- Seepage Collar Each I I $ 700 $ - 5. Construction Contingency (10 %) Lump Sum I 1 1 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Total Water Main Construction: $ 48,000 Engineering/Administration/LegaI for nstructic n 1. Engineering Design Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2. Construction Staking and Oversight Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 3. City Administration / Legal Lump Sum 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Total Engineering /Admin /Legal: $ 40,000 Easements 1. Perm Easement (trenched gravity sewer) - 50 ft Acre 1.40 $ 8,000 $ 11,203 width 2. Temp Easement (trenched gravity sewer) - Acre 2.24 $ 4,000 $ 8,962 add'l 80 ft width 3. Perm Easement (trenched water main along Acre 0.42 $ 8,000 $ 3,361 sewer route) - add'l 15 ft width 4. 1Temp Easement (trenched water main along Acre 0.0 $ 4,000 $ - sewer route) Total Easements: $ 24,000 Total Alternate 6: S 188,000 Alternate 7 Gravity to South and Downtown Lift Station City of Corcoran Sewer Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1 12" Gravity Sanitary Sewer & MHs < 15 -ft deep Lineal Feet 260 $ 50 $ 13,000 2. Linear Sediment Control Lineal Feet 260 $ 2 $ 1,000 3. Jacked 24" Steel Casing (CR 10) Lineal Feet 90 $ 300 $ 27,000 4. 8" Sanitary Sewer Forcemain and Manholes Lineal Feet 1,140 $ 50 $ 57,000 5. Downtown pump station and electrical Lump Sum 1 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 6. Seed and Mulch Acre 0.8 $ 1,100 $ 1,000 7. Construction Contingency (10 %) Lump Sum 1 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 Total Construction: $ 191,000 Water Main Construction Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount 1. 12" PVC Water Main (C900) Lineal Feet 1,400 $ 30 $ 42,000 2. 12" Gate Valve & Box Each 4 $ 2,500 $ 10,000 3. Hydrant (incl. 6" gate valve and 5LF of 6" hydrant lead) Each 4 $ 4,000 $ 16,000 4. Anti - Seepage Collar Each 0.79 $ 700 $ - 5. Construction Contingency (10 %) Lump Sum 1 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 Total Water Main Construction: $ 75,000 F, n gineering /Administration/l,egal for Construction 1. Engineering Design Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 2. Construction Staking and Oversight Fees Lump Sum 1 $ 13,000 $ 20,000 3. City Administration / Legal Lump Sum 1 $ 13,000 $ 20,000 Total Engineering /Admin/Legal: $ 80,000 Easements 1. Perm Easement (trenched gravity sewer) - 50 ft Acre 0.30 $ 8,000 $ 2,388 width 2. Temp Easement (trenched gravity sewer) - add'l Acre 0.48 $ 4,000 $ 1,910 80 ft width 3. Perm Easement (trenched forcemain sewer) - Acre 0.79 $ 8,000 $ 6,281 30 ft width 4. Temp Easement (trenched forcemain sewer) - Acre 0.79 $ 4,000 $ 3,140 add'130 ft width 5. Perm Easement (trenched water main along Acre 0.48 $ 8,000 $ 3,857 sewer route) - add'1 15 ft width 6. Temp Easement (trenched water main along Acre 0.0 $ 4,000 $ - sewer route) Total Easements: $ 18,000 Total Alternate 7: $ 364,000 Appendix C Preliminary Assessment Roll CITY OF CORCORAN Sewer And Water Utility Project PID Owner Net Developable Acres Total Assessed 25- 119 -23 -21 -0011 Greg Ebert 26.3 $37,931.68 24- 119 -23 -34 -0002 Corcoran Land LLC 66.5 $95,798.82 25- 119 -23 -22 -0001 Greg Ebert 22.8 $32,858.18 25- 119 -23 -12 -0002 Stanley /Sharon Chastek 38.1 $54,964.92 25- 119 -23 -11 -0001 Francis M Geuers Fam LTD Ptsh 31.4 $45.197.48 25- 119 -23 -14 -0001 Clarence Schommer et al 23.1 $33,258.92 Total 208.1 $300,010.00 Unit Cost $1,441.51 Per Acre Net Developable Acres = Total acres minus NWI wetlands T: \2294 \05 \Assessment List City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2011-57 Motion By: Seconded By: November 21, 2011 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEWER AND WATER UTILITY PROPJECT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota held a public hearing on the 21St day of November, 2011, to review and discuss the feasibility report provided by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the project is necessary to implement the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds the sewer and water project to be feasible. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Corcoran City Council: 1) Authorizes the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for the Base Project and Alternatives as identified in the report dated November 2011. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 21st day of November 2011. Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor ATTEST: City Seal Jeanie Heinecke — City Clerk 4.8 SUMMARY OF ALTERNATES The total cost potential of the alternates is summarized below: Alternate 1 Under CR 116 $108,000 Altemate 2 Under CR 10 $182,500 Altemate 3 City Hall Extension $431,500 Alternate 4 Water Booster Station $250,000 Alternate 5 Forcemain to Schendel $215,000 Alternate 6 Gravity to Schendel $188,000 Alternate 7 Downtown Lift Station $364,000 4 -4 T:M94- Corooren510 -Sewer and Water Plarning (T!F 6istdots)Teasibility reportlnovember reportTeasbillty report revised 110111.doc City of Corcoran City Council Meeting Minutes November 10, 2011 9a. The Corcoran City Council met on November 10, 2011, at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were, Mayor Guenthner, Councilor Asleson, Councilor Cossette, Councilor Gmach, and Councilor Milbrandt. Also present were City Administrator Donahue, City Attorney Carson, City Engineer Torve, Public Works Superintendent Meister, Corporal Hamilton, Director of Public Safety Gormley and City Clerk Heinecke. Mayor Guenthner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 1. Call to Order /Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval Add: 10c. Bullet Trap MOTION: made Gmach, seconded by Cossette to approve the agenda as presented with one addition. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). 4. Open Forum 1%6.op • William Glowacki, 19520 Stieg Road -Made a formal complaint against law firm Carson, Cleland & Schreder, specifically firm associate Dawn Speltz. Requested a meeting with a council member and Ms. Speltz. Mayor agreed to review Mr. Glowacki's file and report back to the council • Scott Quale -Mn Spect-Mr. Quale read a letter he received from Administrator Donahue regarding the transition process to a new building official. Mr. Quale further read parts of the contract with the city regarding payment for services. Mayor to review with staff. • Rex Bowman, 7770 Corcoran Tr E- Concerned about the changed in the dust control program. Is it as needed now and what is the city's direction on this service? Mayor spoke to the council's activity so far this year. 5. Presentations -None 6. Planning Business -None 7. Engineering a. Director of Public Safety Gormley reported nothing new regarding the Hwy 55 update. May be some updates in January 2012. b. Discussion of Street Improvement Plan will be on the 12/8 council meeting agenda with cost modeling of street maintenance. 8. Public Hearing - None 9. Consent Agenda a. Draft Minutes of October 27, 2011 Council Meeting MOTION: made Milbrandt, seconded by Cossette to approve the October 27, 2011 council meeting minutes with identified changes. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). 10. Staff Reports /Memos City of Corcoran City Council Meeting Minutes November 10, 2011 9a. a. Parks and Trails commission Draft Minutes of October 18, 2011 minutes received for information purposes. b. Mayor Guenthner updated the council on the need to re- examine the needs for fire protection services. Council agreed to enter into an agreement with Emergency Services Consulting not to exceed $2,000 to provide an RFP for fire protection services. MOTION: made Gmach, seconded by Milbrandt to authorize an amount not to exceed $2,000 overview recommendation regarding establishing a fire protection RFP. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). c. City attorney Carson to update the contract for the Bullet Trap based on vendor and city input. ,AW'IV 11. Unfinished Business a. Council continued the discussion and review of the Proposed 2012 Budget. Council made suggestion's to update the budget worksheet. Updates will be provided at the 11/21/11 meeting for information with discussion at the 12/08/11 meeting. b. A public hearing is scheduled for November 21, 2011 related to the Sewer and Water Project. c. Public Works Facility to be discussed at a closed meeting. d. Council suggested additional descriptive language for the city Snow Plow Policy. Document to be returned at the 11/21/11 council meeting e. City Attorney Carson to distribute combined review forms to all council members with City Administrator /Director of Public Safety Performance Reports to be conducted at the 11 /21 /11 council meeting. 12. New Business a. Ordinance 2011 -261 Providing for the Collection of Cost for Unpaid Special Charges MOTION: made Gmach, seconded by Milbrandt to approve Ordinance 2011 -261 as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). b. Resolution 2011 -50 Certifying 2011 Delinquent Recycling Fees MOTION: made Gmach, seconded by Milbrandt to approve Resolution 2011 -50 as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). c. Resolution 2011 -51 Certifying 2011 Delinquent Dust Control Fees MOTION: made Gmach, seconded by Cossette to approve Resolution 2011 -51 as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). d. Resolution 2011 -49 Certifying 2011 Delinquent Property Mgmt Fees MOTION: made Gmach, seconded by Cossette to approve Resolution 2011 -49 as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). City of Corcoran City Council Meeting Minutes November 10, 2011 e. Resolution 2011 -52 Certifying 2011 Delinquent Escrow Fees Related to Land Use Projects MOTION: made Cossette, seconded by Gmach to approve Resolution 2011 -52 as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, (Motion carried 5:0). Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. 9a. 13. Claims as Presented a. Escrow Claims (Fund #500) MOTION: made Milbrandt, seconded by Gmach to approve escrow claims as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). �® b. Building Inspections Claims MOTION: made Gmach, seconded by Cossette to approve building inspection claims as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). c. All Other Claims As Presented MOTION: made Milbrandt, seconded by Asleson to approve all other claims as presented. Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). 14. Unscheduled Items -None Mayor Guenthner recessed the council meeting at 8:42 to consider purchase of property for a Public Works facility. Mayor Guenthner reconvened the council meeting at 9:31 Council authorized City Attorney Carson to proceed with negotiations on property at 23185 Co Rd 10 for the possible acquisition of land for a public works facility. 15. Review of Upcoming Council Meetings 11/21/11 Subdivision Ordinance 12/19/11 Park Dedication Ordinance 11/21/11 Sewer and Water Project Public Hearing MOTION: made by Milbrandt seconded Asleson to adjourn Voting Aye: Guenthner, Asleson, Cossette, Gmach, and Milbrandt. (Motion carried 5:0). Meeting adjourned at 9:35 Jeanie Heinecke, City Clerk 11d. CITY OF CORCORAN SNOWPLOWING POLICY I. Introduction II. Level of Service III. Commencement of Snowplowing Operations IV. Snowplowing Priorities V. Sanding VI. Parking Regulations VII. Resident Responsibilities VIII. Property Damage IX. Cul -de sac and Dead -end Streets X. Emergency Procedures Page 1 of 6 11d. I. Introduction The goal of the Corcoran Public Works Department is to clear snow and ice from City roads as soon as possible. Delays may occur in the event of equipment breakdown or extreme weather conditions. The safety of the public and City employees is our top priority. The City of Corcoran has 69 miles of roads that are maintained. Residents expect to have their roads plowed in a reasonable amount of time. To do this, decisions need to be made when to commence plowing, how much sanding, which roads are plowed first, the estimated cost, etc. This policy has been prepared to set procedures and practices to provide save winter driving conditions on City roads. It is based on past practices of the City Road Department, input by residents, and a report by the Office of the State Auditor, entitled "Snow and Ice Control — A Best Practices Review ". II. Level of Service The intent of this policy is to provide safe winter driving conditions. The level of service described herein shall be considered a guideline with the understanding that immediately after a storm the level of service provided may be less than described herein and may vary across the City depending on localized storm conditions and other circumstances. Streets shall be plowed and /or sanded to allow intersections and curves to be as safe as conditions allow. The City will use sand, salt, and other chemicals when there are hazardous, ice or slippery conditions. The City is concerned about the effect of such chemicals on the environment and will limit its use for that reason. During light to normal snowfall, streets shall be plowed their full width as soon after the initial pass as possible. During heavier snowfalls the streets shall be widened as the storm intensity lessens. After the storm passes, clean -up operations shall begin to clear intersections and snow storage areas along corners and road right -of -ways. It is the city's intent to complete the initial plowing and widening operations within twenty -four (24) hours of the storm. Clean -up operations should be complete within twenty -four (24) hours for light snowfalls and within seventy -two (72) hours for heavy snowfalls. Extreme weather conditions (blizzards /high winds, ice /rain, or other unusual weather events) may require additional time to complete the snow /ice removal operation. No two winter storms are identical therefore, different conditions may require different responses. Page 2 of 6 11d. III. Commencement of Snowplowing Operation Snow plowing and /or ice control operations shall commence under the direction of the Public Works Supervisor or his /her designated representative, City Administrator, and or Public Safety Director. The Public Works Supervisor or his /her designated representative will decide when to commence snow or ice control operations, based on his /her judgment of current and predicted weather conditions and the policies as herein set forth. The criteria for the decision to begin snow and /or ice control operation are as follows: • Snow accumulation of 2 inches or more warrants the plowing of asphalt roads, 2 to 4 inches warrants the plowing of both asphalt and gravel roads dependent on road conditions. Call out is normally at 2 a.m. when practical (snow fall is over). It is advisable to plow at this time if possible, so that traffic is minimal and to open roads for the morning commute. • Drifting of snow may also warrant commencement of operation depending upon conditions. • Icing and /or freezing rains may warrant commencement of sanding operations depending upon the extent and conditions. • Public Works Supervisor, or his /her designated representative, shall determine the time to begin operations. • Operations will continue until all roads are passable. Widening and clean- up of operations may continue immediately or on the following working day(s) depending upon conditions and circumstances. IV. Suspension of Snowplowing Operations The criteria for suspension of snowplowing operation are as follows: • Safety of the plow operators and the public is important. Therefore, snow plowing operations may be terminated after 12 — 14 hours to allow personnel adequate time for rest. There may be instances where this is not possible depending on storm conditions and other circumstances. • High winds, creating white out conditions, could cause suspension of plowing operations until weather conditions improve. V. Snowplowing Plow Routes /Priorities The City of Corcoran's snowplowing priorities are as follows Page 3 of 6 11d. 1. High volume major collector roads, roads with steep hills and curves, commercial businesses 2. Emergency Services /City Hall parking lot 3. Residential streets 4. Cul -de -sacs and Cartway type roads that terminate in a dead -end and City Park parking lot 5. Widening or winging roads may continue several days after a large snow fall or after high winds. VI.Salting and Sanding Hills, curves, and intersections are normally salted /sanded during plowing operation when trucks are used. During heavy snowfall when graders, tractor, and loader are used, salting /sanding becomes a separate operation. • It should be noted that certain weather conditions (primarily rain followed by excessively cold temperatures) could make it impossible to keep roads completely ice free. Chemicals are effective only too about 10 degrees Fahrenheit. • Sanding operation may commence at the direction of the Public Works Supervisor or his /her designated representative and with any ice conditions due to normal freezing /thawing and freezing rain. VII. Parking Regulations • No parking on City streets from November 1St through March 31St • After November 1St, but before the first snow fall, vehicles in violation may receive warning tags to remind the public of no parking restrictions. VIII. Resident Responsibilities The City requests the following from residents: • Keep updated on current and predicted weather conditions. • Be aware of the snow removal equipment and please do not crowd the plow. • Expect snow removal equipment to back up frequently. • Park vehicles off the street and road right -of -ways and cul -de -sacs. • Be patient — plowing and sanding takes time • Minnesota Statute 160.27 subd 5, and city ordinance prohibits plowing, pushing or blowing snow across city roads. • Clean snow from around mailboxes. • Group mailboxes in cul -de -sacs when possible. Page 4 of 6 11d. • Place garbage and recycling containers away from the edge of the road so they don't get covered. • Snow plowing will cause additional snow to be deposited in driveways and around roadside obstacles. Residents should be aware that they may need to clear their driveways several times until their street has been plowed and winged its full width. • Decorative rocks, landscaping plant gardens, lawn sprinkler heads, posts, fences, or other obstruction to snow plowing operations are not allowed in the right -of -way. These items need to be removed at the cost of the resident if viewed as a snow removal hazard. IX. Property Damage The City practices the following property damage policy: A. If placed 42 inches above the curb (or roadway if no curb exists), mailboxes, newspaper boxes and posts physically hit by a plow will be repaired or replaced by the City (up to a maximum cost of $60.00) as time permits. B. Damage caused by the weight of snow IS NOT the responsibility of the City. C. Boulevard damage is not repaired by the City. D. The city will assume NO RESPONSIBILITY for damage to underground lawn sprinkling systems, exterior lighting systems, and similar landscaping installed in the public right -of -way. Public right -of -way typically includes the area of the improved street plus additional property between the improved street and a resident's property line. On most Corcoran streets this is approximately 60 feet (or 30 feet from roadway centerline), refer to your survey to confirm distance. Snow plowing and snow storage will take place in the area approximately 15 ft from the traveled road surface into a resident's property (commonly described as public right -of- way.). X. Cull-de-Sacs • The wings on the snow plow trucks are mounted on the right side. Thus, 80% of the snow is deposited on the right side of a cul -de -sac. • Mailboxes should be grouped at the beginning of the cul -de -sac, on the left side of the road, to allow adequate room for snow storage. XI. Emergency Snowplow Procedures Page 5 of 6 11d. The City may want to institute the following emergency procedures to keep residents informed. • The Mayor, City Administrator, or Public Safety Director may declare a snow emergency after discussing the matter with the Public Works Supervisor or his /her designated representative. • No unnecessary travel is advised. • The City Administrator or Public Safety Director will attempt to keep residents informed about current conditions and progress of clearing the roads. • The City Administrator or Public Safety Director will keep the City Council informed about current conditions and progress to clear roads. • The City may also decide to inform the media in extreme circumstances. • The Mayor, City Administrator, or Public Safety Director will cancel the snow emergency when conditions improve enough so travel is again possible. • If there is a medical or other emergency situation where police, fire or other emergency vehicles are unable to reach a resident or business, road maintenance personnel are authorized to make every effort to allow emergency vehicles to obtain access. Page 6 of 6 STAFF REPORT / POLICE DEPARTMENT Agenda Item 10b Council Meeting: Prepared By: November 21, 2011 Chief Sean Gormley Topic: Action Required: Part -time Officer Retirement / Replacement Information Only Background- Officer Ed Subject had served out community since 2006 as a part -time officer. He was a valuable asset to our department. In addition to his willingness to cover any shift at a moments notice, he also helped mentor our officer with the years of knowledge he gained from 41 years in law enforcement. In short, he will be missed. I and the members of our department wish Ed Subject the best in his retirement from public safety. Discussion- I have filled the part -time vacancy with Officer Brian Dahlquist. He has recently retired from fulltime police services. He is in the basic training phase and should be available to fill vacancies in the next 30 days. Financial Impact- No additional impact Attachments — Ed Subject's letter dated November 4, 2011 Recommendation- Information only November 4, 2011 Chief Sean Gormley Corcoran Police Department 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, Minnesota 55340 Dear Chief Gormley: I am writing this letter to advise you of my retirement. As you know my license will expire in June of 2012. 1 will be ending my career in law enforcement at that time. I want to thank you for all the years of friendship and leadership that you have given me. It has been an honor and a privilege for me to have worked for the Corcoran Police Department. You should be proud of all the members and staff of this organization. I have been blessed to have met and worked with many fine people over my 41 year career. Through your leadership and vision I was able to experience many new technologies' as the job has grown more and more professional. Thank you for all the support you have given me and I wish you continued success. Respectfully, ............. Ed Subject Retired Police Officer City of Corcoran Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Thursday, November 3, 2011 E. Commissioners Present: Chair Hank, Jacobs, Kadlec, Ravnholdt, Laddusaw, Jacobs, and Krueger. Alternate Commissioners Kohnen and Wu Absent: Laddusaw, Ravnholdt Others present for the meeting: Council Liaison Cossette, Mayor Guenthner, Councilors Gmach, Milbrandt, Asleson, Parks and Trails Commissioners Krueger and Tessmer, City Administrator Donahue, Office Manager Smith - Arens, City Planner Kendra Lindahl and TKDA Consultant Sherri Buss. 1. Call to Order. Chair Hank called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Open Forum -None 4. Approval of: a. Agenda. MOTION by Ravnholdt / Kadlec to approve the agenda as presented. All voted aye. (Motion carried 6:0) b. Minutes of September 1, 2011. Mayor Guenthner suggested the dollar amount noted in 6.d.i of $20,000 should be $15,000 (from the appraisal authorized by the city council on property at XXXXX County Road 10). MOTION by Jacobs /Krueger to approve minutes with suggested change. All voted aye. (Motion carried 6:0) noted 5. New Business a. Public Hearing - Highland Subdivision Preliminary Plat (city file 11 -010) i. No one came forward to speak on the matter The Planning Commission asked whether the parcel was one parcel or two. Although Hennepin County shows the property with two PID numbers, the applicant provided a title commitment that Highland Subdivision (city file 11 -010) 2 November 21, 2011 meeting shows that the two parcels were consolidated in 2009 under a quiet title. The city has no record of this and the Mayor asked if that quiet title was perhaps not recorded at the County. The applicant indicated that it was their belief that the title had been recorded and the private driveway easement between the two old parcels was vacated as part of that (staff has reviewed this issue and finds no evidence that this combination was ever discussed with the City. Staff notes that it is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the title work is accurate and recordable). MOTION by Krueger / Ravnholdt to close the public hearing. All voted aye. (Motion carried 6:0) iv. MOTION by Ravnoldt /Jacobs to recommend approval of Planning Case 11 -010 as presented but with the requirement that #4 of the resolution be amended to include language to the effect that the applicant must revise the plans to show the location of the existing septic and the location of the future /secondary septic system on Lot 1, Block 1 of the site plan. All voted aye. (Motion carried 6:0) 6. Unfinished Business City of Corcoran Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Thursday, November 3, 2011 E. a. Park Dedication Ordinance Update (Subdivision Ordinance Section 955). Consultant Sherri Buss introduced the topic to the Commission and audience. She explained the background, state law, Corcoran's past and present ordinance, the actions by the Parks and Trails Commission during 2011 to get to this point, and the public hearing that was held and closed by the Planning Commission on October 6, 2011. Participating in the discussion were members of the City Council and the Parks and Trails Commissions. Questions were raised about the disparity of the amount that could potentially be paid in fees by property owners inside and outside the MUSA line, there were also questions raised about the draft language in Subd 6 of the draft ordinance. Consultant Buss was advised to work with the City Planner and the City Attorney to address the concerns. ii. Motion by Kadlec and seconded by Ravnholdt to change language in Subd 6 and make changes in the fee schedule based on discussions by the Planning Commission. All voted aye. (motion carried 6:0) 7. Reports: a. Liaison Report. Cossette updated the Commission on the council actions to table further consideration of the Subdivision Ordinance revisions until the City Planner had a chance to review and make suggested changes. He also talked about the PW Facility and the current efforts to obtain further property appraisals. b. Other. None 8. Adjournment: MOTION by Krueger / Ravnholdt to adjourn. All voted aye. (Motion carried 6:0) Adjourned at 9:41 pm ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Agenda Item No. 11a. Council Meeting: Prepared By: November 21, 2011 Dan Donahue, Administrator Topic: 2012 Budget and Proposed Admin Action Required: Department Training Information Policy: Jeanie Provide the necessary training, tools, and direction to employees to carry out required duties Budget Impact: Jeanie Summary: The following is a matrix of the expenditures and training of Admin Personnel: Admin Department Year Budget Actual Training Event Employee 2010 $1,000 $725 Banyon Financial Software Jeanie City Clerk Certification 1 st yr 1 week Jeanie City Clerk Conference 3 days Jeanie Laserfiche '/2 day Jeanie Jill Tanya 2011 $1,000 $1,044 Seminar - Managing under Pressure 1 day Jill Laserfiche Users Conference 1 day Tanya Jeanie City Clerk Certification 2 nd yr 1 week Jeanie Cit Clerk Conference 3 days Jeanie 2012 $2,000 City Clerk Institute 3 rd yr (completion) Jeanie City Clerks Conference 3 days Jeanie Jill Laserfiche Jill Jeanie Jeanie Administrator's Report— November 21, 2010 Council Meeting Page 2 2012 Budget Actual Software Training 2010 $2,000 $1,348 Effective Mgmt Program 6 time 2'/2 hrs, yr long Field Reservation 1 day Jill State Administrator's Conference 2'/z da Jeanie 2011 $3,000 $2,700 (est) Tanya ICMA Conference, Milwaukee, WI 3 days Dan Financial Management 1 day Permits 1 day Jill Land Use Basics 3 hours Jeanie 2012 $3,000 Tanya State Administrator's Conference 2'/2 day Dan Software Training stated above City Administrator Year Budget Actual Training 2010 $2,000 $1,348 Effective Mgmt Program 6 time 2'/2 hrs, yr long State Administrator's Conference 2'/z da 2011 $3,000 $2,700 (est) Effective Mgmt Program 6 times 2 '/2 hrs, yr long ICMA Conference, Milwaukee, WI 3 days Financial Management 1 day Land Use Basics 3 hours 2012 $3,000 Effective Mgmt Program 6 time 2'/2 hrs, yr Ion State Administrator's Conference 2'/2 day Software Training stated above 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2012 DRAFT BUDGET 11/21/11 REV 7.0 2 11a. 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2010 ACTTAL 2011 BUDGET 2011 ACTUAL AS OF 11/04/11 2012 BUDGET BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2011/12 % CHANGE 2011 COMMENTS PASS THROUGH 4 CITY HALL DEPARTMENTS COMMENTS 5 City Council 61 41100 -100 Wages & Salaries 6,600 6,600 3,300 6,600 $ 0% 7 41100 -122 FICA/SS 409 409 205 409 $ 0 0% 8 41100 -126 Medicare 96 96 48 96 $ 0 0% 9 41100 -210 O erating Expense 100 285 100 $ 0% 10 41100 -364 Workers' Compensation 52 55 55 $ 0% 11 Total City Council 7,157 7,260 3,837 7,260 $ 0 0% 12 13 News Letter/Website 141 41130 -351 News letter, Misc literature 4,067 4,000 3,340 4,000 $ 0% 16 41130 -354 Website 636 700 700 700 $ 0% 17 Total Newsletter & Web 4,703 4,700 4,040 4,700 0% 18 19 Elections 20 41410 -210 Operating Supplies 6,507 1,000 282 9,000 $ 8,000 800% Equipment purchase, increase in election judge pay 21 Total Elections 6,507 1,000 282 9,000 8,000 800% 22 231 Auditor 24 41540 -300 Professional Services 29,044 16,500 16,612 17,000 $ 500 3% 25 Financial Services 3,000 5,958 6,000 $ 3,000 100% 26 Total Auditor 29,044 19,500 22,570 23,000 3,500 18% 27 28 _ Assessor 29 41550 -210 Operating Supplies 1,331 500 616 500 $ 0% 30 41550 -300 Professional Services 49,284 49,284 41,070 49,284 $ 0% 311 Total Assessor 50,615 49,784 41,686 49,784 $ 0% 32 33 Attorney 34 41600 -300 Professional Services 69,753 35,000 17,864 35,000 $ 0% 35 Total City Attorney 69,753 35,000 1 17,864 35,000 $ 0% 36 37 City Charter 38 41000 -210 Operating Supplies 9 235 $ 0% 391 41000 -300 Professional Services 1,049 $ 0% 40 Total City Charter 1,058 235 $ 0% 41 42 Other General Government _ 47 41900 -300 Professional Srvs 2,890 $ 0% 48 41900 -321 Telephone - - $ 0% 49 41900 -360 Insurance 40,640 45,000 42,717 48,000 $ 3,000 7% 2011 -2012 premium amount pending 50 41900 -430 Misc Banking Charges $ 0% 511 41900 -433 Dues & Memberships 23,274 23,411 22,207 24,000 $ 589 3% Elm Creek Watershed, Home Free, NWHSC, League of MN Cities, AMM, Mediation 52 41900 -810 Refunds /Reimbursements - $ 0% 53 $ 0% 54 Total Other Government 63,914 68,411 67,814 72,000 3,589 5% 55 56 Planning & Zoning _ 57 41910 -300 Professional Services 72,551 32,000 50,896 32,000 $ - 0% 58 Ordinance Update Comp Plan 0% 591 Total Planning &Zoning 72,551 32,000 50,896 32,000 $ 0% 60 61 City Hall Operating Expenses _ 62 41941 -200 Office Supplies 2,111 3,000 1,896 3,000 $ 0% 63 41941 -201 Postage/Shipping 2,551 4,100 1,419 4,100 $ 0% 64 41941 -207 Computer / Copier Supplies 2,266 3,000 2,953 3,000 $ 0% 65 41941 -210 Operating Supplies 15,160 9,500 10,263 9,500 $ 0% Cintas, Zep, Adams, Erkens Water 66 41941 -300 Professional Services 7,250 7,000 8,913 7,500 $ 500 7% Admin fees (Paychex, Acclaims, US Bank, HRA) 671 1 41941 -321 Telephone 3,085 3,000 2,518 3,000 $ 0% 68 41941 -352 Gen. Notices Public Hearing information 3,651 2,000 1,261 2,000 $ 0% Crow River / Sun News 69 41941 -364 Workers Comp Insur. ( Misc. Vol. Commissioners Staff) 565 1 438 $ (127) -22% 70 41941 -380 Utilities / Outside Services 17,848 13,500 11,585 14,500 $ 1,000 7% Center Point, Randys, Wright Henn Elec, Wright Henn Security 71 41941 -400 Repairs /Maintenance Bldg. 2,884 4,000 5,990 4,000 $ 0% 72 41941 -520 Buildings & Structures $ 0% 73 41941 -810 Refunds /Reimbursements $ 74 Total City Hall Operating 56,806 49,665 46,797 51,038 1,373 3% 751 1 76 IT Technology 78 41951 -207 lComputer / Supplies 5,285 7,385 2,988 12,000 $ 4,615 62% Managed service 79 Total IT Technology 5,285 7,385 2,988 12,000 $ 4,615 62% 80 81 Engineering 82 43170 -260 Comprehensive Plan - $ - 0% 83 43170 -300 Professional Services 41,277 36,000 54,625 56,000 $ 20,000 56% 20K PW Facility Planning 841 Total Engineering 41,277 36,000 1 54,625 56,000 $ 20,000 56% 85 86 Fire 87 42200 -300 Professional Services 1 248,613 243,857 191,498 250,000 $ 6,143 3% Estimate 88 42200 -550 Motor Vehicles 18,946 17,000 11,258 - $ 17,000 -100% Hamel Fire considering a capital purchase in 2012 89 42200 -580 Safety Inspections 1,000 1,000 $ 0% New -Start inspection program 90 Total Fire Servicesl 267,560 261,857 202,756 1 251,000 1 $ 10,857 -4% THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2012 DRAFT BUDGET 11/21/11 REV 7.0 2 11a. 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2010 ACUTAL 2011 BUDGET 2011 ACTUAL AS OF 11/04/11 2012 BUDGET BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2011112 % CHANGE 2011 COMMENTS PASS THROUGH 91 921 Building Inspections _ 93 42400 -300 Professional Services 45,885 25,000 36,771 30,000 $ 5,000 20% 94 42400 -437 iSurcharges 2,969 2,300 2,275 2,500 $ 200 9% 95 Total Building Inspections 48,854 27,300 39,046 32,500 $ 5,200 19% 236 237 43232 -210 Operating Supplies 202 1,075 720 1,000 $ 75 -7% 238 43232 -300 Professional Services 66,339 63,345 59,455 63,345 $ - 0% Pending RFP results 239 Total Recycling 66,541 64,420 1 60,175 64,345 75 0% 96 97 GRAND TOTAL CITY HALL 725,083 599,862 555,438 635,282 35,420 6% 98 99 City Administrator 100 41300 -100 Wages & Salaries 87,960 87,623 62,347 92,141 $ 4,518 5% Includes step increase and 2% COLA 101 41300 -121 PERA 6,161 6,353 4,520 6,680 $ 327 5% 1021 41300 -122 FICA / SS 4,890 5,433 3,461 5,713 $ 280 5% 103 41300 -126 Medicare 1,151 1,271 802 1,336 $ 65 5% 104 41300 -130 Employer Paid FSA 350 350 350 $ 0% 105 41300 -131 1 Employer Paid Health 11,566 12,671 9,199 12,671 $ 0% 106 41300 -133 Employer Paid HSA 3,090 $ 0% 107 41300 -140 Unemployment Compensation 2,514 $ 0% 108 41300 -208 Training 1,567 3,000 2,532 3,000 $ 0% 109 41300 -210 Operating Supplies 500 837 700 $ 200 0% 1111 41300 -364 Workers' Compensation 903 996 709 840 $ 156 -16% 112 41300 -433 Dues & Memberships 834 900 766 900 $ 0% 113 Grand Total City Administrator 117,895 119,097 88,264 124,331 5,234 4% 114 115 City Clerk / Administrative Staff 0 116 41400 -100 Wages & Salaries 115,842 122,543 87,157 130,521 $ 7,978 7% Includes step increase and 2% COLA 117 41400 -110 Overtime 960 2,000 194 2,000 $ 0% 118 41400 -121 PERA 8,578 9,174 6,295 9,608 $ 434 5% 1191 41400 -122 FICA /SS 7,593 7,843 5,880 8,217 $ 374 5% 120 41400 -126 Medicare 1,787 1,835 1,364 1,922 $ 87 5% 121 41400 -130 1 Employer Paid FSA 850 850 700 1,050 $ 200 24% 122 41400 -131 Em toyer Paid Health 6,086 25,342 6,165 31,678 $ 6,336 25% 123 41400 -132 Medical Cafeteria 8,026 10,216 $ 0% 124 41400 -133 Employer Paid H S A 1,875 1,720 $ 0% 125 41400 -140 Unemployment Compensation 3,822 $ 0% 126 41400 -208 Training 725 1,000 1,044 2,000 $ 1,000 100% 1271 41400 -210 Operating Supplies 396 500 $ 500 0% 129 41400 -364 Workers' Compensation Insurance 1,337 1,352 1,293 1,411 $ 59 4% 130 41400 -433 1 Dues & Memberships 160 150 60 1 150 $ 0% 131 Grand Total Admin Staff 157,640 172,089 122,484 189,057 16,968 10% 132 133 Code Enforcement 134 41920 -100 Wages & Salaries 13,863 2,693 10,998 $ 2,865 -21% Includes step increase and 2% COLA 135 41920 -110 Overtime $ 0% 1361 41920 -121 PERA 977 195 797 $ 180 -18% 137 41920 -122 FICA / SS 836 166 682 $ 154 -18% 138 41920 -126 Medicare 195 39 1 159 $ 36 -19% 139 41920 -130 1 FSA Employer 150 $ 150 -100% 140 41920 -131 Health Insurance 6,336 $ 6,336 0% 1/2 of employee health insurance premium 141 41920 -140 Unemployment Compensation $ 0% 142 41920 -208 Training $ 0% Budget dollars included in City Clerk/Admin Staff budget 143 41920 -210 Operating Supplies 1,500 531 1,500 $ 0% 1441 41920 -331 Vehicle Ex ense $ 0% 145 41920 -344 Public Hearing Notices $ 0% 146 41920 -364 Workers' Compensation $ 0% 147 41920 -417 Uniform - 100 $ 100 0% 148 149 Grand Total Code Enforcement 17,522 3,625 20,572 3,050 17% 150 151 1521 43190 -300 Professional Services $ 153 Total Employee Benefit Chgs $ 154 Transfers to /from Other Funds 155 49360 -710 Residual Equity Transfer $ 0% 156 49360 -720 Operating Transfers 4,842 $ - 0% 158 159 Grand Total Administration 1,005,460 908,569 769,810 969,242 $ 60,673 7% 160 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2012 DRAFT BUDGET 11/21/11 REV 7.0 2 11a. 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2010 ACUTAL 2011 BUDGET 2011 ACTUAL AS OF 11/04/11 2012 BUDGET BLIDULT DIFFERENCE 2011/12 % CHANGE 2011 COMMENTS PASS THROUGH 161 PUBLIC WORKS 0 1 162 PERSONNEL SERVICES 163 43100 -100 Full -time - Regular 276,057 274,872 195,333 280,363 $ 5,491 2% Includes 2% COLA increase 164 43100 -110 Full -time - Overtime 24,077 19,000 17,876 19,000 $ 0% Includes $1,000 for Country Daze 165 43100 -121 PERA 22,801 21,233 15,453 21,704 $ 471 2% 166 43100 -122 FICA /SS 16,965 18,158 11,572 18,561 $ 403 2% 167 43100 -126 Medicare 4,462 4,247 2,681 4,341 $ 94 2% 168 43100 -130 Employer Paid FSA 1,750 1,750 350 1,750 $ 0% 1691 43100 -131 Employer Paid Health 35,885 63,355 41,389 63,355 $ 0% 170 43100 -132 Medical Cafeteria 4,759 4,683 $ 0% 171 43100 -133 Employer Paid H S A 11,044 9,272 $ 0% 173 43100 -140 1 Unemployment Compensation 589 $ 0% 174 43100 -364 Workers' Compensation Insurance 17,974 16,512 13,163 15,076 $ 1,436 -9% 175 43100 -417 Uniforms 4,950 7,000 4,946 7,000 $ 0% 176 177 1781 1 $ 1% 179 PW MICS. OPERATING EXPENSES 180 43100 -200 Office Supplies $ 0% 181 43100 -208 ITraining and Instruction 1,786 2,500 1,780 2,500 $ 0% 182 43100 -210 10perating Supplies 20,026 18,000 11,631 20,000 $ 2,000 11% 183 43100 -212 Motor Fuels 30,382 30,000 33,952 30,000 $ 0% 184 43100 -220 Repair/ Main. Supplies 19,065 18,000 83,175 20,000 $ 2,000 11% 185 43100 -223 Building Repair 50,711 6,500 7,748 6,500 $ 0% 1861 43100 -300 Professional Services 2,100 32,100 2,100 1 2,100 $ 30,000 -93% 187 43100 -321 Telephone 3,941 3,600 3,511 3,600 $ 0% 188 43100 -360 Insurance 3,645 $ 0% 189 43100 -380 Utility services 7,142 10,000 7,733 10,000 $ 0% 190 43100 -810 Refunds /Reimbursements 191 T 192 193 CITY OPERATING SERVICES 1941 43100 -222 Seal Coating 52,440 50,000 50,088 50,000 $ 0% 195 43100 -225 Land Scapa/Ditch Maintenance 8,305 10,000 8,863 10,000 $ 0% 196 43100 -226 Sign Repair Material 3,415 6,000 57 6,000 $ 0% 197 43100 -227 Crack Filling 10,667 15,000 15,338 16,000 $ 1,000 7% crude oil price increase 198 43100 -228 Dust Control 75,338 90,000 98,033 90,000 $ 0% based on past experience - may change with council decision 199 43100 -229 Culverts 6,242 6,500 10,081 7,000 $ 500 8% 201 43100 -231 Drain Tile $ 0% 202 43100 -232 Gravel 103,078 128,000 95,049 130,000 $ 2,000 2% 2031 43100 -233 Asphalt/Maintenance patching 143,687 100,000 123,719 130,000 $ 30,000 30% asphalt price increase 204 43100 -381 Signal Lights/street lights 2,412 4,000 1,853 4,000 $ 0% 206 Total PW Operating PARKS PERSONNEL SERVICES 405,586 409,500 403,080 ON 207 208 45200 -100 Wages and Salaries 15,498 16,700 13,136 28,128 $ 11,428 68% Includes step increase and 2% COLA, added PT position for 1040 hours, increased rink scheduled hours 209 45200 -110 Overtime 1,083 - $ 0% 210 45200 -121 PERA - $ 0% 2111 45200 -122 FICA /SS 983 1,022 760 1,744 $ 722 71% 212 45200 -126 Medicare 231 239 177 408 $ 169 71% 213 45200 -130 Employer Paid FSA - $ 0% 214 45200 -131 1 Employer Paid Health - $ 0% 215 45200 -364 Workers' Compensation Insurance 2,600 2,805 3,799 4,493 $ 1,688 60% 216 217 Total Parks Personnel 218 PARKS - MISC. OPERATING EXPENSES PARKS EJE 2191 45200 -210 Operating Supplies 8,087 7,100 5,595 8,000 $ 900 13% 220 45200 -220 Repair/ Main. Supplies 255 1,100 1,100 $ 0% 221 45200 -221 Maintenance Project 9,457 10,000 7,144 15,000 $ 5,000 50% 222 45200 -300 1 Professional Services 600 $ 600 -100% 223 45200 -321 Telephone 721 700 675 700 $ 0% 224 45200 -380 Utility services 5,769 7,100 3,657 7,100 $ 0% 225 45200 -530 Improvements Other than Bldg 35,903 35,823 35,823 35,823 $ 0% NW Trails Snowmobile Club expense 45200 -33422 $35,823 226 45200 -810 Refunds /Reimbursements $ 0% 227 2281 T_, .rating 62,423 52,894 67,723 5,300 8% 229 230 Total Parks 80,586 83,189 70,766 102,496 19,307 23% 231 232 Ice & Snow Removal 233 43125 -210 Snow and Ice Removal 32,703 20,000 11,083 29,000 $ 9,000 45% Salt and Sand 43125 -36200 N/A 2012 234 Total Snow & Ice 32,703 20,000 11,083 29,000 9,000 45% 235 241 GRAND TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS & PARKS 1,145,529 1,123,936 1,013,452 1,164,691 40,755 4% 242 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2012 DRAFT BUDGE1" 11/21/11 REV 7.0 2 11 a. 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2010 ACUTAL 2011 BUDGET 2011 ACTUAL AS OF 11/04/11 2012 BUDGET BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2011/12 % CHANGE 2011 COMMENTS PASS THROUGH 243 POLICE AL dia 244 PERSONNEL SERVICES AL 245 POLICE 246 42100 -100 Wages and Salaries 492,602 481,465 341,756 505,745 $ 24,280 5% 2% COLA/Step Increase Jesse, and Duane /Lieutenant Position 247 42100 -110 Overtime 8,870 13,000 5,977 9,500 $ 3,500 -27% Includes $1,000 for Country Daze /Lieutenant not eligible for OT or Holiday Cash 248 42100 -111 Overtime Events 12,285 20,000 10,517 15,000 $ 5,000 -25% Pass thru funds only /no Motocross/ No Rockin Rogers 42100 - 33620/34201 $15,000 249 42100 -121 PERA 75,120 73,626 51,354 76,043 $ 2,417 3% 250 42100 -122 FICA / SS - $ 0% 2511 42100 -126 Medicare 7,443 8,651 5,366 7,657 $ 994 -11% 252 42100 -130 Employer Paid FSA 2,450 2,800 264 2,450 $ 350 -13% 253 42100 -131 Employer Paid Health 34,167 41,741 33,096 39,283 $ 2,458 -6% 254 42100 -132 1 Medical Cafeteria 25,863 33,222 27,784 31,266 $ 1,956 -6% 255 42100 -133 Employer Paid H S A 9,376 10,222 8,601 9,621 $ 601 -6% 256 42100 -134 Employer Paid HRA $ 0% 257 42100 -364 Workers' Compensation 26,979 26,564 24,787 29,065 $ 2,501 9% 258 259 W, TOTAL 695,155 711,291 509,502 725,630 $ 14,339 2% 260 PART TIME 261 42101 -100 Wages and Salaries 64,661 57,225 49,110 76,325 $ 19,100 33% Deducted $2,000 transfer from PW gravel for extra truck enforcement 2011 /able to manage with this proposal 262 42101 -110 Overtime $ 0% 263 42101 -111 Overtime Events 2,162 3,313 $ 0% Pass thru only -PT officer works events if no full time officer available -funds from 42100 -111 42100 - 33620134201 264 42101 -121 PERA 4,290 1,250 1,541 2,500 $ 1,250 0% 2010 spike employee issue related 265 42101 -122 FICA / SS 3,887 2,866 1,134 4,732 $ 1,866 65% 2010 spike employee issue related 2661 42101 -126 Medicare 969 670 747 1 1,107 $ 437 65% 42101 -140 1 Unemployment Com 1,151 - $ - 0% 267 TOTAL 75,969 62,011 56,994 84,664 $ 22,653 37% 268 POLICE ADMIN 269 42102 -100 Wages and Salaries 36,549 38,230 26,591 40,248 $ 2,018 5% Clerk step pay and 2% COLA 270 42102 -110 Overtime 500 500 $ 0% 271 42102 -121 PERA 2,796 2,808 1,921 2,954 $ 146 5% PT officers who are employed as full time at home agency are PERA eligible 272 42102 -122 FICA / SS 2,499 2,401 1,848 2,526 $ 125 5% 2731 42102 -126 Medicare 588 562 428 591 $ 29 5% 274 42102 -130 Employer Paid FSA 350 350 350 350 $ 0% 275 42102 -131 1E mplo er Paid Health 164 295 1,206 1,300 $ 1,005 341% Accurate breakout of funds from 42100 276 42102 -132 1 Medical Cafeteria 4,616 8,376 3,745 5,200 $ 3,176 -38% 277 9F TOTAL 47,563 36,090 53,669 $ 147 0% 278 279 SUPPLIES 280 42100 -200 Office Supplies 4,670 4,000 3,565 5,000 $ 1,000 25% 2811 42100 -201 Postage 465 500 483 500 $ 0% 282 42100 -208 Training Classes and Supplies 9,706 11,600 11,340 10,000 $ 1,600 -14% 283 42100 -209 Police Reserves Equipment 2,806 3,500 1,963 3,500 $ 0% 284 42100 -210 Patrol Supplies 3,434 3,500 2,337 3,500 $ 0% 285 42100 -212 1 Motor Fuels 30,805 30,000 30,736 34,000 $ 4,000 13% Petroleum variable - anticipate 2011 will be underfunded 286 42100 -417 Clothing and Uniforms 6,909 7,310 6,012 8,460 $ 1,150 16% $2,000 one time expense for FT officer - new uniforms 287 42100 -433 Dues and Memberships 1,065 1,000 790 1,000 $ 0% 288 42100 -810 Refunds /Reimbursements $ 0% 2891 TOTAL 59,860 61,410 57,227 65,960 $ 4,550 % 290 291 292 42100 -220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Maintenance - Motor Vehicle 9,066 8,000 7,893 8,000 $ 0% 293 42100 -223 Building Maintenance and Repairs 3,268 3,000 1,477 3,000 $ 0% 294 42100 -300 Professional - Animal Control 500 500 $ 0% 295 42100 -301 Prisoner - Professional Fees 3,065 10,000 3,667 8,000 $ 2,000 -20% 296 42100 -304 Legal Services 28,757 35,000 23,407 30,000 $ 5,000 -14% 2971 42100 -321 Tele hone 4,939 7,200 4,678 7,200 $ 0% 298 42100 -323 Radio Units 12,543 17,300 8,939 15,300 $ 2,000 -12% 299 42100 -380 Utili Services / Civil Defense/Emergency Defense/Emergency Management 3,074 4,000 1,979 4,000 $ 0% 300 301 64,713 85,000 52,040 76,000 $ (9,000) 1°/ 302 303 GRAND TOTAL POLICE 943,260 973,234 711,854 1,005,923 32,689 3% 304 305 306 SINED GRAND TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,094,249 3,005,739 2,495,116 3,139,856 $ 134,117 4% 307 308 309 310 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2012 DRAFT BUDGET 11/21/11 REV 7.0 2 1 11 a. 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2010 ACUTAL 2011 BUDGET 2011 ACTUAL AS OF 11/04/11 2012 BUDGET BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2011112 % CHANGE 2011 COMMENTS PASS THROUGH 312 REVENUES 2010 ACTUAL 2011 BUDGET 2011 ACTUAL AS OF 11/04/11 2012 BUDGET BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2011/12 313 314 41900 -31020 Delinquent Property Taxes 76,178 25,000 30,210 40,000 $ 15,000 315 41900 -31040 Fiscal Dis arities 178,897 35,000 101,928 $ 35,000 316 41900 -31050 Property Tax Unallotment $ 317 41900 -31100 General Property Taxes 2,092,929 2,411,777 1,102,519 2,499,908 $ 88,131 4% 319 Total Taxes Received 2,348,003 2,471,777 1,234,656 2,539,908 $ 68,131 3% 320 GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 3211 41900 -31810 Cable Franchise Fee 34,674 30,000 32,000 $ 2,000 7% 322 41900 -32110 Liquor Licenses Fees 18,260 18,500 18,260 18,200 $ 300 -2% 323 41900 -33402 Homestead Credit 1,515 $ 324 41900 -33403 Mobile Homestead Credit $ 0% 325 41900 -33420 AG Preserve Credit 3,306 1,000 $ 1,000 -100% 326 41900 -33421 PERA State Aid 1,845 1,845 923 1,845 $ 0% 327 41900 -33422 Other Grants and Aid 28,630 8,000 7,370 $ 8,000 -100% 328 41900 -34000 Charges for Services 400 65 $ 3291 41900 -34103 Zoning / Subdivision Fees 5,410 5,000 5,630 5,000 $ 0% 330 41900 -34105 Copies / Maps 303 100 78 100 $ 0% 331 41900 -34107 Assessment Search 25 50 75 50 $ 0% 332 41900 -34108 TIF Administrative Fees 22,000 8,000 8,500 $ 500 6% 334 41900 -34405 Clean up day Income 963 1,200 1,060 1,000 $ 200 -17% 335 41900 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenue 5,381 1,000 285 1,000 $ 0% 336 41900 -36210 Interest Earnings 4,443 6,000 2,430 6,000 $ 0% 337 41900 -36217 Sale of Assets $ 0% 3381 41900 -36220 Rents / Royalties 7,812 7,812 3,906 $ 7,812 -100% Crop Rentals 339 41900 -36230 Donations 1,975 800 $ 340 41900 -36233 Refunds /Reimbursements - $ CODE ENFORCEMENT 341 41920 -32100 Business /License Fee $ 342 41920 -34000 Char es for Services $ CITY HALL OPERATIONS 343 41941 -34100 General Government $ 3441 41941 -34101 lFacility Rental 3,165 4,719 3,873 4,500 $ 219 -5% 345 41941 -36200 1 Miscellaneous Revenue 1,456 970 - $ PUBLIC SAFETY 346 42100 -32240 Animal Licenses 8 $ 0% 347 42100 -33423 Police Town Aid 46,328 47,000 46,565 47,000 $ 0% 348 42100 -33424 Police Training & POST 3,585 4,000 3,787 4,000 $ 0% 349 42100 -33620 Other Grants and Aid /Safe & Sober 10,321 13,000 6,956 10,000 $ 3,000 -23% Pass through only - Local traffic project 42100 - 111/42101. 111 $10,000 350 42100 -34200 Police Permits 1,685 1,500 1,185 1,500 $ 0% 3511 42100 -34201 Police Service Charge 8,400 7,000 5,128 5,000 $ 2,000 -29% 352 42100 -34202 Police Reports / Misc. Fees 1,699 1,500 786 1,500 $ 0% 353 42100 -34204 1 Police Training 474 $ 354 42100 -35101 Fines 110,389 70,000 83,425 70,000 $ 0% 355 42100 -36230 Donations $ 356 42100 -36233 Refunds /Reimbursements $ BUILDING INSPECTION 357 42400 -32210 Building Permit Fees 77,358 37,000 61,973 42,000 $ 5,000 14% PUBLIC WORKS 358 43100 -33418 MSA Road Maint. Fund 84,891 110,000 129,364 130,000 $ 20,000 18% 359 43100 -34300 Public Works Permits / Fees 1,535 3,000 3,520 3,000 $ 0% 360 43100 -34301 Dust Control 77,854 72,530 30,044 72,530 $ 0% 361 43100 -36100 Special Assessments 275 $ 362 43100 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenue 70,272 71,445 $ Insurance settlement - 1 ton truck 363 43100 -36233 Refunds /Reimbursements $ ICE & SNOW REMOVAL 3641 43125 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenue 1 8,010 43125 -210 N/A 2012 RECYCLING 365 43232 -33610 County Recycling Grant 16,474 16,400 14,551 16,400 $ 366 43232 -34400 Recycling Income 66,946 62,000 61,179 62,000 $ 0% 367 43232 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenue 6 $ PARKS 368 45200 -33422 Other State Grant 35,823 35,823 35,823 35,823 $ Snowmobile trail grant 45200 -530 $35,823 369 45200 -34101 1 Facility Rental 1,165 2,500 1,340 1,000 $ 1,500 -60% 3701 45200 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenue 105 45 $ 371 45200 -36230 Donations 3,895 1,320 $ 372 45200 -36233 Refunds /Reimbursements $ TRANSFERS TO /FROM OTHER FUNDS 373 49360 -39200 Transfer from Other Fund 16,426 $ 375 PW Facility Bond Proceeds 20,000 376 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES 777,475 576,479 612,168 599,948 $ 23,469 4% 377 378 TOTAL ALL REVENUES 3,125,478 3,048,256 1,846,824 3,139,856 1 $ 91,600 3% 379 380 ALLOCATION FROM RESERVE FUNDS 381 REVENUES LESS DISBURSEMENTS 31,229 42,517 (648,292) - $ (42,517) 382 * *These are monies available for the Reserve Funds THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 2012 DRAFT BUDGET 11/21/11 REV 7.0 2 11 a. 3 LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2010 ACUTAL 2011 BUDGET 2011 ACTUAL AS OF 11/04/11 2012 BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2011/12 % CHANGE 2011 COMMENTS PASS THROUGH 383 384 385 Debt Service 386 Equipment Certificate Fund # 309 & 416 387 2004 & 2006 & 2008 Certificates 388 389 Disbursements 390 Equipment Certificate 391 1 Fiscal Agent Fees / Issuing Fees 392 Principal 214,000 183,000 3931 Interest 50,477 37,170 394 Required 5% overage 13,224 11,009 395 Total 277,701 122,891 231,179 396 397 Revenues 398 Levy 277,701 231,179 $ (46,522) 399 1 Interest 400 Sales of Assets 4011 Bond Proceeds 402 Total 277,701 231,179 $ (46,522) 403 404 Facility Expansion (PD) #307 & #407 405 Fund #407 from 2006 and forward 406 Disbursements 407 1 Project Costs 408 Principal 34,000 36,000 4091 Interest 6,930 5,412 410 Required 5% Overage 2,047 2,071 411 Total 42,977 41,380 43,483 $ 506 412 413 REVENUES LESS DISBURSEMENTS 414 Total Debt Service 320,678 274,661 $ (46,017) 415 Total Property Tax Levy 2,732,455 2,774,569 $ 42,114 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK Agenda Item L A N D F 0 R M From Site to Finish • 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: November 11, 2011 for the November 21, 2011 City Council Meeting RE: Subdivision Ordinance Amendment Application Request • • Tel: 612 - 252 -9070 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077 www.landform.net The City has been working since April 2010 to prepare the new ordinances required to implement the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. One of these tools is the Subdivision Ordinance. Several sections of the Subdivision Ordinance will be amended. A redlined version of the Subdivision Ordinance is attached. A "clean" version, without redlines and strike - throughs, is available at City Hall. 2. October 27th City Council Meeting The City Council reviewed this item at the October 27th meeting. The Council tabled the item and directed staff to address 5 issues: Council member Cossette expressed concern about the existing language regarding voting, which states that approval "shall require passage by a majority vote of the entire City Council." The intent was to clarify whether a majority vote was required of the members present or all members of the Council. The statutes require a majority of from all Council members, so on Corcoran's 5- person council, a plat would require 3 affirmative votes to be approved regardless of whether 3, 4 or 5 Council members were present at the meeting. The language in the statute is "a majority vote of all its members ". • We have revised the Ordinance to use the statutory language the following sections: a. 930.010, Subd. 5(C) b. 935.010, Subd. 4 (C) c. 972.030, Subd. 8 2. Clarify the site plan review requirements for septic systems in an OSP (940.050, Subd. 1(C). The City will require submittal of information so that the site plan issues related to septic systems may be reviewed, but permitting of such systems shall remain the responsibility of Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota (depending on the type of system). • We have revised the language accordingly. 3. The Council discussed the open space requirements for OS &P plats. The draft indicated that OS &P plats with permanent open space preserve a minimum of 25% of the land as permanent open space and there is no open space requirement when no permanent dedication is proposed. This is a very dramatic departure of the current ordinance which Landforrr ", SensiblyGieen M and Site to Finish- are service marks of Landform Engineering Company. s • • 0 requires at least 50% of the land be retained as permanent open space. The City Planner was not part of the greenway committee discussions and, therefore, it is difficult to make recommended changes to the draft that the greenway committee prepared. However, we do believe that a minimum amount of open space should be preserved for ALL OS &P plats. Therefore, we have drafted revised the draft language to require a minimum of 25% percent of the land to be retained as open space (whether temporary or permanent) in order to benefit from the development right bonuses provided by the ordinance. (Section 940.050, Subd. 1(A)(3)). 4. The Council discussed the minimum lot size requirements for OSP plats. The Council questioned how we incent landowners to preserve open space if there is no minimum or maximum lot size. The current draft has no minimum or maximum lot size. There was some discussion of the Zoning Ordinance maximum lot size for the "clustering option" in the Urban Reserve district, which states "The maximum lot area of each created clustered lot shall not exceed two times the minimum lot area for a single family dwelling in the zoning district that is compatible with the land use category in which the property is located." Provided that the Council requires a minimal about of open space preservation with each plat, the minimum and maximum lot size becomes less important. Most of the OS &P plats are likely to be in the RR zoning district, which has a 2 -acre minimum lot size, use of this language would result in a 4 -acre maximum lot size. • Should the Council wish to adopt minimum and maximum lot size requirements, staff recommends that Section 940.050, Subd. 1(D)(1) remain as is for a minimum lot size and a new #2 be added as follows: "The maximum lot area of each created lot shall not exceed two times the minimum lot area for a single family dwelling in the zoning district that is compatible with the land use category in which the property is located." 5. The Council discussed the new definition of "tree inventory ". There was some discussion about whether certain types of trees be exempted from the inventory. Staff has reviewed this issue with a number of city planners and city foresters in the metro. While we have found a number of cities that exempt certain types of trees from replacement requirements or prohibit them as new plantings, we have been unable to identify a city that exempts a certain type of tree from the inventory. The idea is that all trees should be inventoried as part of a plat so that the developer and City can work together to preserve the trees that are worth saving. The City of Corcoran does not have a tree preservation requirement, but does require that the tree inventory be provided for all preliminary plats. This is an opportunity to ensure that significant natural resources are preserved. We have tried to minimum the cost to developers by allowing them to identify the edge of woodland areas without identifying significant trees within this area. Staff does not recommend exempting trees from inventory. In fact, several foresters noted that "undesirable" trees are sometimes most important to inventory as they may be invasive species or species that are subject to insect or disease invasion (e.g. elms and ash are two recent examples) and; therefore, should be inventoried and monitored or removed. • We have revised the definition to clarify the process as directed by the council. • We have not revised the definition to exempt undesirable trees from the inventory. It is our recommendation that if the City were ever to adopt a woodland protection ordinance, that would be the appropriate location to exempt certain trees from protection. Subdivision Ordinance Amendment November 21, 2011 M 0 The City could adopt a list of acceptable plant materials as part of the Zoning Ordinance landscape requirements. That future amendment could list trees that can be planted in Corcoran and list undesirable trees (such as Invasive Tree Species that are non - native to the ecosystem and whose introduction causes economic or environmental harm. Invasive tree species are identified by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and include, but are not limited to Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), Glossy Buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula), Tartarian Honeysuckle (Lonicera tatarica), Amur Maple (Acer ginnala), and Siberian Elm ( Ulmus pumila)). o For your information, we have attached an excerpt from the City of Scandia Zoning Ordinance. This includes a list of recommended plant materials and a list of prohibited plant materials (including A species of the genus Ulmus (elm), except those elms bred to be immune to Dutch Elm disease; Female Cottonwood; A species of the genus Fraxinus (ash); or Female ginko). If the Council wishes to amend the Zoning Ordinance to prohibit certain types of trees from planting and /or provide a list of preferred trees, this is a good example of what that list might look like. 3. Planning Commission Public Hearing The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 2, 2011. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the Subdivision Ordinance with several amendments. The Planning Commission had several questions about the OS &P Plat language and recommended a number of changes to clarify that section. These changes have been included in the draft ordinance. The Planning Commission raised questions about the minimum lot size and whether the current language would have required a PUD for everything. Based on a conversation with Council Member Gmach, we understand that was not the intent of the Greenway Committee and have revised the ordinance language accordingly. Staff has revised the draft ordinance as directed by the Planning Commission. 4. Summary The draft includes few substantive policy changes for the City. The changes related to two main issues: Updates to the OS &P Plats as recommended by the Greenway Committee and updates to the Variances standards related to 2011 Legislation. There are a few typographic errors and numbering corrections that will be made administratively as well. The substantive changes are to the following sections: Section 915 - Rules and Definitions Section 940 — Open Space and Preservation (OS &P) Plats Section 970 — Administration - Variances 5. Analysis There are a few substantive changes in the Subdivision Ordinance, which are identified below: Subdivision Ordinance Amendment November 21, 2011 ! Definitions (915). Several new definitions were created by the Greenway Committee related to the revised Open Space and Preservation Plats. • At the Planning Commission's direction a definition of "tree inventory" was added. The plat requirements include a provision for a tree inventory but do not define which trees must be inventoried. We added a definition that says woodland stands and trees with a caliber of 8- inches or more must be included in the inventory. This is similar to the definition that was in the old OSP plat requirements. There is no tree preservation requirement in the ordinance. This is simply an exercise to identify significant trees. • Since the Planning Commission reviewed this document in June, there were changes to the definitions in the Zoning Ordinance. A few other changes were made in the definitions section of this document to be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance definitions. Open Space and Preservation Plats (Section 940). The Open Space and Preservation (OS &P) Plats replaces the old Open Space Preservation language in its entirety. The Comprehensive Plan encourages preservation of natural features, large tracts of open space and view corridors. The new ordinance language is based on the same underlying concepts as the original language, but has been modified to better reflect the work of the Greenway Committee. One significant change relates to the open preservation: Under the old ordinance language, open space was to be permanently preserved, but under the draft language, permanent preservation is no longer required. This language and the new definitions come directly from the Greenway Committee. The only change made by staff was to ensure the consistent use of the term "development rights" throughout the document. However, following the Planning Commission meeting several recommendations from the Planning Commission were incorporated. Specifically: • Clarify in 940.050, Subd. 1(D) that the underlying zoning district is the standard but that variations may be approved if certain standards have been met. • Clarify in 940.050, Subd. 1(D)(2)(a) that it is 75 -foot maximum setback, except adjacent to major roads where it is a minimum setback of 100 feet. Variances (Section 970). On May 5, Governor Dayton signed the legislation amending MN Statutes, Section 462.357, Subd. 6. to restore municipal variance authority in response to Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka, 783 N.W.2d 721 (Minn. June 24, 2010). The law also provides consistent statutory language between Minnesota Statutes, chapter 462 and the county variance authority of Minnesota Statutes, section 394.27, subdivision 7. In Krummenacher, the Minnesota Supreme Court narrowly interpreted the statutory definition of "undue hardship" and held that the "reasonable use" prong of the "undue hardship" test is not whether the proposed use is reasonable, but rather whether there is a reasonable use in the absence of the variance. The new law changes that factor back to the "reasonable manner" understanding that had been used by some lower courts prior to the Krummenacher ruling. The new law was effective on May 6, the day following the governor's approval. The new law renames the municipal variance standard from "undue hardship" to "practical difficulties," but otherwise retains the familiar three - factor test of (1) reasonableness, (2) uniqueness, Subdivision Ordinance Amendment 4 November 21, 2011 • • • and (3) essential character. Also included is a sentence new to city variance authority that was already in the county statutes: "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan." I have revised this draft language with City Attorney Carson for consistency with the new Statute. We do not believe that this language change will impact the City review process. The burden of proof remains on the applicant to show compliance with the variance standards. Other issues Staff has identified these as the key issues in the Subdivision Ordinance; however, the City Council may have other comments. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: a. Ordinance approving the updates to the Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 9 of the Corcoran City Code b. Resolution approving Finding of Fact for Ordinance Amendments c. Ordinance approving summary publication of Subdivision Ordinance. Approval of the Ordinance and Findings of Fact requires a 3/5 vote of the City Council. Approval of the Summary Publication Ordinance requires a 4/5 vote of the City Council. Attachments 1. Ordinance 2011 -262 adopting amendments to Subdivision Ordinance 2. Resolution 2011 -48 approving Findings of Fact 3. Ordinance 2011 -263 approving Summary Publication 4. Sample of landscaping requirements from the City of Scandia Subdivision Ordinance Amendment November 21, 2011 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2011 -262 Motion By: Seconded By: November 21, 2011 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendments. The text of Sections 915, 930, 935, 940, 970 and 975 of Chapter 9 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: See Attachment A SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this 21St day of November 2011. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 1 of 1 City Seal Subdivision Ordinance City of Corcoran, Minnesota City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 Adopted March 23, 2004 Updated November 21, 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Table of Contents SECTION 910 - TITLE, PURPOSE AND INTENT ............................... ............................... 1 910.010 - Title ................................................................................ ............................... 1 910.020 - Purpose and Intent ....................................................... ............................... 1 910.030 - Relationship to Comprehensive Plan ........................... ............................... 2 910.040 - More Restrictive Provision to Apply ............................ ............................... 2 910.050 - Conformity With This Chapter Is Required ................. ............................... 2 910.060 - Separability ................................................................... ............................... 2 910.070 - Authority ....................................................................... ............................... 2 SECTION 915 - RULES AND DEFINITIONS ...................................... ............................... 3 915.010 - Rules of Word Construction ......................................... ............................... 3 915.020 - Definitions ..................................................................... ............................... 3 SECTION 920 - SUBDIVISION APPROVAL REQUIRED .................... ............................... 9 920.010 - Subdivision Approval Required ................................... ............................... 9 920.020 - Conveyance by Metes and Bounds ............................... ............................... 9 920.030 - Registered Land Surveys .............................................. ............................... 9 SECTION 925 - PREMATURE SUBDIVISION PROHIBITED ........... ............................... 11 925.010 - Premature Subdivision Prohibited ............................ ............................... 11 SECTION 930 - PRELIMINARY PLAT PROCEDURE ....................... ............................... 15 930.010 - Preliminary Plat Procedure ........................................ ............................... 15 930.020 - Application Requirements .......................................... ............................... 18 SECTION 935 - FINAL PLAT PROCEDURE ..................................... ............................... 25 935.010 - Final Plat Procedure .................................................... ............................... 25 935.020 - Application Requirements .......................................... ............................... 26 SECTION 940 - OPEN SPACE AND PRESERVATION (OS &P) PLATS ........................... 44 940.010 - Purpose of Division ..................................................... ............................... 45 940.020 - Objectives of Division and Definitions ...................... ............................... 45 940.030 Application Types ...................................................... ............................... 46 940.040 - Procedure .................................................................... ............................... 47 940.050 - Development Standards ............................................. ............................... 48 940.060 - Ownership of Common Areas . ................................... ............................... 55 940.070 - Calculation of Base Density; Density Bonuses ......... ............................... 56 SECTION 945 - DESIGN STANDARDS ............................................. ............................... 59 945.010 - General Standards ....................................................... ............................... 59 945.020 - Lot Improvements ....................................................... ............................... 60 Table of Contents Page i O�-*o�TNovember 21, 2011 945.030 - Sidewalks and Trails ................................................... ............................... 67 945.040 - Drainage and Water Quality ....................................... ............................... 68 945.050 - Sewer and Water Facilities ......................................... ............................... 69 945.060 - Other Utilities .............................................................. ............................... 69 SECTION 950 - EROSION CONTROL ............................................... ............................... 71 950.010 - Erosion Control Plan ................................................... ............................... 71 950.020 - Erosion Control Measures .......................................... ............................... 71 SECTION 955 - PARK DEDICATION ............................................... ............................... 77 955.010 - Statutory Authorization, Findings of Fact and Statement of Purpose ... 77 955.020 - Required Dedication ................................................... ............................... 78 SECTION 960 - DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ................................. ............................... 85 960.010 - Purpose ........................................................................ ............................... 85 960.020 - Required Basic Improvements ................................... ............................... 85 960.030 - Other Improvements Required .................................. ............................... 86 960.040 - Completion of Basic Improvements ........................... ............................... 86 960.050 - Financial Guarantees ................................................... ............................... 87 960.060 - Release and Expiration of Financial Guarantees ...... ............................... 88 960.070 - Performance Guarantee .............................................. ............................... 88 SECTION 965 - OFFICIAL MAPS ..................................................... ............................... 91 965.010 - Purpose ........................................................................ ............................... 91 965.020 - Official Map Defined .................................................... ............................... 91 965.030 - Initiation of Proceedings ............................................. ............................... 91 965.040 - Reference to Planning Commission ........................... ............................... 91 965.050 - Notice and Hearing ...................................................... ............................... 92 965.060 - Preparation and Filing of Maps .................................. ............................... 92 965.070 - Effect ............................................................................ ............................... 92 965.080 - Appeals ........................................................................ ............................... 93 SECTION 970 - ADMINISTRATION - VARIANCES ......................... ............................... 95 970.010 - Purpose ........................................................................ ............................... 95 970.020 - Board of Adjustments and Appeals ............................ ............................... 95 970.030 - Review Criteria ............................................................ ............................... 95 970.040 - Procedures .................................................................. ............................... 96 970.050 - Appeal of Council Ruling ............................................. ............................... 98 970.060 - Expiration .................................................................... ............................... 98 SECTION 975 - ADMINISTRATION - VACATIONS OF RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND EASEMENTS...................................................................................... ............................... 99 975.010 - Procedure .................................................................... ............................... 99 975.020 - Filing ............................................................................ ............................... 99 975.030 - Public Hearing Required ............................................. ............................... 99 Table of Contents Page ii O�-*o�TNovember 21, 2011 SECTION 980 - ADMINISTRATION - APPEALS ............................ ............................... 101 980.010 - Board Designation ..................................................... ............................... 101 980.020 - Applicability ............................................................... ............................... 101 980.030 - Filing .......................................................................... ............................... 101 980.040 - Stay of Proceedings ................................................... ............................... 101 980.050 - Procedure .................................................................. ............................... 101 980.060 - Appeals from the City Council .................................. ............................... 102 SECTION 985 - ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES ...................... ............................... 103 985.010 - Administration .......................................................... ............................... 103 985.020 - Enforcement .............................................................. ............................... 103 985.030 - Penalties .................................................................... ............................... 104 Table of Contents Page iii O�-*o�TNovember 21, 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Table of Contents Page iv O�-*o�TNovember 21, 2011 SECTION 910 - TITLE. PURPOSE AND INTENT 910.010 - Title. This Chapter shall be known as the "Corcoran Subdivision Ordinance" except as referred to herein, where it shall be referred to as "this Chapter ". 910.020 - Purpose and Intent. The intent of this Chapter is to protect and provide for the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City and its people, and specifically to achieve the following purposes: A. To implement the Comprehensive Plan; B. To ensure that subdivisions are consistent with all applicable provisions of all applicable plans, laws and regulations; C. To establish standard requirements, conditions, and procedures for the design and review of subdivisions; D. To provide for the orderly subdivision of land, and to ensure proper legal descriptions and monumentation of subdivided land; E. To encourage the wise use and management of land and natural resources throughout the City in order to preserve the integrity, stability, and natural beauty of the community; F. To ensure that adequate public infrastructure, facilities and services are available concurrent with development; G. To require subdividers to furnish land, install infrastructure, pay fees, and establish mitigative measures to ensure that development provides its fair share of capital facilities; H. To encourage a beneficial relationship between the uses of land and circulation of traffic throughout the City, and to provide for the proper location and design of streets; I. To prevent problems associated with inappropriately subdivided lands, including premature subdivision, excess subdivision, partial or incomplete subdivision, or scattered subdivision; To assure that new subdivisions will contribute toward an attractive, orderly, stable, livable, and safe community. Section 910 (Title, Purpose and Intent) Page 1 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2010 910.030 - Relationship to Comprehensive Plan. It is the policy of the City of Corcoran that the enforcement, amendment, and administration of this Chapter be accomplished consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as may be amended from time to time. The City Council recognizes the Comprehensive Plan as the official policy for the regulation of land use and development in accordance with the policies and purpose herein set forth. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 473, the City will not approve any changes in these regulations that are not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 910.040 - More Restrictive Provision to Apply. Where the regulations imposed by any provisions of this Chapter are either more or less restrictive than comparable regulations imposed by this Chapter, or any other law, ordinance, rule, or regulation of the city, state, or federal government, the law, ordinance, rule, or regulation which imposes the more restrictive condition, standard, or requirement shall prevail. 910.050 -Conformity With This Chapter Is Required. No land shall be divided, subdivided, or re- subdivided in a manner that does not comply with the provisions of this Chapter. 910.060 - Separability. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City that the several provisions of this Chapter are separable in accordance with the following: Subd. 1. If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge any provision of this Chapter to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect any other provisions of this Chapter not specifically included in said judgment. Subd. 2. If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge invalid the application of any provision of this Chapter to a particular property, such judgment shall not affect the application of said provision to any other property not specifically included in said judgment. 910.070 -Authority. This Chapter is enacted pursuant to the authority granted by the Municipal Planning Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462.351 to 462.365. Section 910 (Title, Purpose and Intent) Page 2 October- 21, 2010 SECTION 915 - RULES AND DEFINITIONS 915.010 - Rules of Word Construction. The terms and words used in this Chapter shall be interpreted as follows: Subd. 1. The present tense includes the future tense. Subd. 2. The words "shall" and "must" are mandatory; the word "may" and "should" are permissive. Subd. 3. The singular includes the plural, and the plural includes the singular. Subd. 4. All measured distances expressed in feet shall be to the nearest one - tenth of a foot. Subd. 5. For terminology not defined in this Chapter, elsewhere in the City Code, or in the Minnesota State Building Code, Merriam - Webster's Collegiate Dictionary Tenth Edition shall be used to define such terms. Subd. 6. If a conflict arises between the graphic illustrations presented in this Chapter and the text of this Chapter, the text shall prevail. 915.020 - Definitions. The following words and terms, wherever they occur in this Chapter, shall be interpreted as herein defined: Block: An area of land within a subdivision that is entirely bounded by streets, or by a combination of streets, public lands, railroad rights -of -way, water bodies, or the exterior boundary lines of the subdivision. Boulevard: The portion of the street right -of -way between the curb line (or in the absence of a curb, the improved roadway) and a lot line. Centralized wastewater treatment system: A wastewater treatment system in which wastewater is collected from many homes and treated at a single facility. City Council: The governing body of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City Engineer: The person designated by the City Administrator to be the City Engineer for the City of Corcoran. City Planner: Individual or firm so designated and authorized by the Corcoran City Council. Section 915(Rules and Definitions) Page 3 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 Cul -de -sac: A local street with only one vehicular outlet, having an appropriate turn around area at its terminus for the safe and convenient reversal of traffic. Developable Area: The net land area available for development. Developable area is based on the pre- development conditions of the site and is calculated as follows: gross land area minus wetlands, areas below the 100 -year ordinary high water elevation and right -of -way or easements for existing public streets. Easement: A grant of one or more property rights by a property owner for use by the public, a corporation, or another person or entity. Engineering Design Standards: Standards adopted and amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council which provide information and establish standards, specifications and details for the construction of public and private improvements, as on file with the City of Corcoran. Individual Sewage Treatment System (ISTS): A wastewater treatment system serving a dwelling or business using a septic tank or tanks and optional pretreatment unit followed by a soil treatment and dispersal unit that discharges below grade or other approved sewage treatment and disposal device. Lot: A tract, plot, or portion of a subdivision or other parcel of land intended as an individual unit for the purpose, either immediate or future, of transfer of ownership, or possession, or for building development. Lot of Record: Any lot which is one unit of a plat duly approved and filed, or one unit of an Auditor's Subdivision or a Registered Land Survey that has been recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles for Hennepin County. Minnesota, prior to the effective date of this Ordinance.' of of Record: n ,-,ar -cel of land whose existence, location and dimensions have been legallY FecoFded o-r such date Lot, Base: A lot meeting all specifications in the zoning district prior to being subdivided into a two - family dwelling, townhouse, or manor home subdivision. Lot Division: Dividing a lot of record by placing new lot lines within its boundary, resulting in the creation of additional lots. Lot Rearrangement: Adjusting the lot lines between two or more lots of record, resulting in the same number of lots. Lot, Through: A lot which has a pair of opposite lot lines abutting two substantially parallel streets, and which is not a corner lot. On a through lot, both street lines shall Section 915(Rules and Definitions) Page 4 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 be front lot lines for applying this Ordinance.' ot, Through: n ant fronting on two-(24 n el, as t t„,l t teFs P- ar -a-rr , ��- v^- r�rR= a- ��ccr- ce�rccr�ectin- g, StFe -et-s. Lot, Unit: A lot created from the subdivision of a base lot for two - family dwelling, townhouse, or manor -home dwelling having different minimum lot size requirements than the conventional base lots within the zoning district. Metes and Bounds: A description of real property which is not described by reference to a lot or block shown on a map, but is described by starting at a known point and describing the bearings and distances of the lines forming the boundaries of the property or delineating a fractional portion of a section, lot or area by described lines or portions thereof. Official Map: A map duly adopted by the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.351 to 462.36. Open Space and Preservation (OS &P) Plats Terms: Temporary Open Space Land: Land that is undeveloped and is either undevelopable or is held in reserve for a future date when urban services are provided. Preservation Area Dedication: Permanently dedicating easements on land identified as meeting the natural resource standards identified by the City for preservation at the time of its dedication or as identified in the comprehensive plan as a natural area worthy of preservation. Restoration Area Dedication: Permanently dedicated easements on land, subject to a formal restoration plan, that at the time of its dedication is in the process of being restored to a natural state as described in a natural resource standard adopted by the City Development Reserve: Land, temporarily restricted by a covenant, but which may be eligible for development once urban services are provided to the site. Natural Resource Standard Adopted by the City: Refers to a description of the desired condition of land with respect to drainage, natural contours, and natural vegetation suited to the location. Standards address capability to sustain diverse wildlife and to provide an esthetically pleasing presentation that is considered an asset to the community in which it is located. Standards consider sustainability and active or passive maintenance requirements associated with use and may be changed from time -to -time in keeping with best practices. Section 915(Rules and Definitions) Page 5 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 Natural Resources Areas: those lands which contain wetlands, woodlands, forested areas, stands of trees, and prairies. Temporary Wastewater Treatment: Use of a restricted site, on or off the premises of the wastewater generating building(s), for the treatment and disposal of wastewater until such time when urban services are provided. Greenway Corridor Land: Land located in the mapped boundary identified as such on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Natural Resource Map. Upland: land not classified as a wetland or water body and is generally dry. Outlot: A parcel of land subject to future platting prior to development, or a parcel of land which is designated for public or private open space, right -of -way, utilities or other similar purpose. Parcel: An individual lot or tract of land. Planning Commission: The Planning Commission of the City of Corcoran except when otherwise designated. Plat: The drawing or map of a subdivision prepared pursuant to Minnesota Statute Chapter 505 and containing all elements or requirements of this Chapter. Plat, Final: A plat to be presented to the City Council for approval and which, if found to be consistent with the approved preliminary plat, may be duly filed with the county registrar of deeds. Plat, Preliminary: A plat submitted to the City for preliminary consideration and approval. Public Improvement: Any sewer pipe, water pipe, drainage ditch, roadway, parkway, sidewalk, trail, tree, lawn, off - street parking area, lot improvement or other facility for which the City may ultimately assume the responsibility for maintenance and operation. Record Plans: A final set of engineering plans that provide accurate and complete information pertaining to the location, construction, and materials used in the construction of streets, utilities, and other improvements. The plans shall incorporate and include all changes and revisions to the final set of approved construction plans that are made during construction as well as other pertinent information. Replat: The platting of an area that was previously platted. Section 915(Rules and Definitions) Page 6 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 Right -of -way: Land acquired by reservation or dedication intended for public use, and intended to be occupied or which is occupied by a street, trail, railroad, utility lines, oil or gas pipeline, water line, sanitary sewer, storm sewer or other similar uses. Street: A public right -of -way for vehicular traffic, whether designated as a highway, thoroughfare, arterial, parkway, collector, through way, road, avenue, boulevard, lane, place, drive, court or otherwise designated, which has been dedicated or deeded to the public for public use and which affords principal means of access to abutting property. Street, Improved: A public roadway that has a paved or gravel surface. Subdivider: Any person commencing an application proceeding under this Chapter to effect a division, consolidation, rearrangement, subdivision or re- subdivision of land. A subdivider is the owner of the land or an individual representing the landowner who has express written authority to act on behalf of the owner. Subdivision: Any division or rearrangement of land, except for those separations: A. Where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots or interests will be 20 acres or larger in size and 500 feet in width for residential uses and 5 acres or larger in size for commercial and industrial uses; B. Creating cemetery lots; C. Resulting from court orders or the adjustment of a lot line by the relocation of a common boundary. Tract: A unit of land described by letter in a registered land survey. Traffic Calming: Street design techniques which are put in place to reduce vehicle speeds, improve safety, or discourage through traffic on residential streets. Examples may include narrow street width, curvilinear streets, raised intersections and crosswalks, speed humps, traffic circles, neck - downs, medians and islands, pedestrian treatments or streetscaping. Tree Inventory: An inventory of trees by location, species, condition and size. The tree inventory shall include all trees with a caliper of 8- inches or more when measured at a point 4 feet above the ground level. The boundaries of significant woodland areas shall also be identified and shall be defined as a clustering of at least three trees, of 2 -1/2 inches of caliper or greater in size and trunks spaced at no greater than 10 -foot intervals. Individual trees are not required to be inventoried if they are within a woodland area as described above. Zoning Administrator: The person designated by the City Administrator to be the Zoning Administrator for the City of Corcoran. (Ord. 224, passed 10- 27 -05, Ord. 226, passed 01- 26 -06) Section 915(Rules and Definitions) Page 7 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Section 915(Rules and Definitions) Page 8 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 SECTION 920 - SUBDIVISION APPROVAL REQUIRED 920.010 - Subdivision Approval Required. Subdivision approval in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter shall be required for the separation of an area, parcel, or tract of land under single ownership into 2 or more parcels, lots, tracts, or long -term leasehold interests. The City will withhold building permits from properties created under state, federal or judicial preemption if such properties do not meet the minimum development standards of the City. 920.020 - Conveyance by Metes and Bounds. All property conveyances must be made by plat, except property divisions by metes and bounds may be allowed for those separations where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots, or interests will be 20 acres or larger in size and 500 feet in width for residential uses and 5 acres or larger in size for commercial and industrial uses. These subdivisions are exempted by State Statute. 920.030 - Registered Land Surveys. All registered land surveys shall be filed subject to the same procedures as required for the filing of a preliminary plat for platting purposes. The standards and requirements set forth in this Chapter shall apply to all registered land surveys. A registered land survey shall not be used to divide a parcel of land into lots for the purpose of transfer of ownership or building development if any of the tracts would not have the required frontage on a dedicated and improved public street. (Ord. 226, passed 01- 26 -06) Section 920(Subdivision Approval Required) Page 9 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Section 920(Subdivision Approval Required) Page 10 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 SECTION 925 - PREMATURE SUBDIVISION PROHIBITED 925.010 - Premature Subdivision Prohibited. Any proposed subdivision deemed premature for development shall not be approved by the City Council. A subdivision shall be deemed premature if the Council determines that any of the following conditions exist. The burden of proof shall be upon the subdivider to show that the proposed subdivision is not premature. Subd. 1. Inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. A proposed subdivision may be deemed premature if it is inconsistent with the purposes, objectives, development staging plan, or recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan, as may be amended. Application for reguiding and /or rezoning may be made simultaneously with an application for subdivision approval, however, a subdivision application will not be considered for approval by the City Council until and unless any necessary reguiding and /or rezoning application is approved by the Council. Subd. 2. Inconsistent with the Capital Improvements Program. A proposed subdivision may be deemed premature if it is inconsistent with the capital improvements program because public improvements, facilities, or services necessary to accommodate the proposed subdivision would not be completed within two years of the date of application. Subd. 3. Lack of Adequate Water Supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to lack adequate water supply if the proposed subdivision does not have adequate sources of water to serve the proposed subdivision if developed to its maximum permissible density without causing an unreasonable depreciation of existing water supplies for surrounding areas. Within the urban service boundary, a proposed subdivision may be deemed premature if public water is not available to serve the proposed subdivision. Subd. 4. Lack of Adequate Waste Disposal Systems. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to lack adequate waste disposal if there is inadequate on -site sewer capacity to support the subdivision if developed to its maximum permissible density. Within the urban service boundary, a proposed subdivision may be deemed premature if: A. Sanitary sewer is neither available nor proposed; or Section 925(Premature Subdivision Prohibited) Page 11 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 B. Available or proposed sanitary sewer is inadequate to support the subdivision if developed to its maximum permissible density after reasonable sewer capacity is reserved for schools, public facilities, and other developments planned within five years of the date of application. Subd. S. Lack of Adequate Streets to Serve the Subdivision. A proposed subdivision may be deemed premature if: A. Streets which serve the proposed subdivision are of such a width, grade, stability, vertical and horizontal alignment, site distance or surface condition that the traffic volume generated by the proposed subdivision would create a hazard to public safety and general welfare, or would seriously aggravate an existing hazardous condition; or B. The traffic volume generated by the proposed subdivision would create congestion or unsafe conditions on existing or proposed streets. Subd. 6. Lack of Adequate Drainage. A proposed subdivision may be deemed premature if: A. Surface or subsurface water retention and runoff is such that it constitutes a hazard to the stability of proposed or existing structures; or B. The proposed subdivision would cause pollution of water sources or would cause damage from erosion or siltation on downstream property; or C. Factors including, but not limited to, the presence of floodplain, poor soils or subsoils, or steep slopes exist in such a manner as to preclude adequate site drainage or treatment of runoff. Subd. 7. Inconsistent with Environmental Requirements. A proposed subdivision may be deemed premature if it is inconsistent with the rules and policies of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, as may be amended, and could adversely impact critical environmental areas, or potentially disrupt or destroy, in violation of State historical preservation laws, historic areas which are designated or officially recognized by the City Council. Subd. 8. Burden of Proof. The burden shall be on the applicant to show that the proposed subdivision or development has adequate public facilities and is not premature. Section 925(Premature Subdivision Prohibited) Page 12 October- 21, 2011 (Ord. 226, passed 01- 26 -06) Section 925(Premature Subdivision Prohibited) Page 13 October- 21, 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Section 925(Premature Subdivision Prohibited) Page 14 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 SECTION 930 - PRELIMINARY PLAT PROCEDURE 930.010 - Preliminary Plat Procedure. An application for a preliminary plat shall be approved or denied pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462.358. Subd. 1. Filing. A preliminary plat application shall be filed with the Zoning Administrator on an official application form. The application shall be accompanied by the fee as set forth in the City Code. The application shall also be accompanied by detailed written and graphic materials, the number and size as prescribed by the Zoning Administrator, fully describing the proposed plat, together with a set of mailing labels of all property owners located within 350 feet of the site in a format prescribed by the Zoning Administrator. The application shall be considered as being officially submitted and complete when the subdivider has complied with all the specified submittal requirements, as described in this Section. If the subdivision requires any variances from the provisions of this Chapter, an application pursuant to Section 970 of this Chapter shall also be submitted before the preliminary plat application shall be deemed complete. Subd. 2. Staff Analysis. Upon receiving a complete application, as determined by staff review, the Zoning Administrator shall refer copies of the preliminary plat to the City staff and other applicable public agencies as needed in order to receive written comments. Preliminary plats including land abutting an existing or proposed trunk highway and /or highway under county jurisdiction shall also be submitted to the Minnesota Commissioner of Transportation and /or the Hennepin County Transportation Planning Division as required by state law, at least thirty days prior to City action on the preliminary plat. The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff person to 1) coordinate an analysis of the application, 2) prepare technical reports, and 3) assist in preparing a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Subd. 3. Public Hearing Notice. Upon completion of staff's analysis of the application, the Zoning Administrator, when required, shall set a public hearing date for an upcoming Planning Commission meeting. Notice of the hearing, including a description of the request and the legal description of the property, shall be published in the City's Official Newspaper at least 10 days prior to the hearing. Written notification of the hearing shall also be mailed to all property owners located within 350 feet of the site at least 10 days prior to the hearing. Failure of a property owner to receive mailed notice or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings. Section 930 (Preliminary Plat Procedure) Page 15 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 Subd. 4. Planning Commission Consideration. The Planning Commission shall consider a preliminary plat application, as follows: A. The Planning Commission shall review the preliminary plat and conduct the official public hearing. B. The subdivider or representatives thereof may appear before the Planning Commission to present information and answer questions concerning the proposal. C. The Planning Commission and staff shall have the authority to request additional information from the subdivider concerning the proposal, as deemed necessary to formulate a recommendation on the proposal. D. The Planning Commission shall recommend approval of the preliminary plat if it in all ways conforms to the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, this Chapter and all Chapters of the City Code. The Commission shall recommend denial of the preliminary plat if it makes any of the following findings: 1. That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Capital Improvements Program, or other policy or regulation, except as such regulations may be modified within a duly approved planned unit development (PUD). 2. That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the purpose and intent of this Chapter. 3. That the physical characteristics of the site are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. Such physical characteristics may include topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention and other similar characteristics. 4. That the site is not physically suitable for the intensity or type of development or use contemplated. S. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial and irreversible environmental damage. Section 930 (Preliminary Plat Procedure) Page 16 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the public. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvement will conflict with easements on record or with easements established by judgment of a court. 8. That the subdivision is premature as determined by the standards of Section 508 of this Chapter. Subd. 5. City Council Consideration. The City Council shall consider a preliminary plat application, as follows: A. Upon receiving the reports and recommendations of the Planning Commission and staff, the City Administrator shall schedule the application for City Council consideration. The Council shall have the option of receiving additional testimony on the matter if they so choose. B. The Council shall either approve or deny the application. C. Approval of a preliminary plat by the City Council shall require passage by a majority vote of th-e -all its membersentiFe City Council. Such approval shall constitute general acceptance of the layout, but shall not constitute final acceptance of the subdivision. Subsequent approval of a final plat will be required before recording of the plat. The Council may require plan revisions and may impose conditions upon approval, as deemed necessary to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. D. If a preliminary plat is denied by the City Council, the reasons for such action shall be recorded in the Council proceedings and transmitted to the applicant within 60 days. Subd. 6. Effect of Approval. For one year following preliminary plat approval, unless the subdivider and City agree otherwise, no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or other official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, or lot layout that was approved. Subd. 7. Effect of Denial. If a preliminary plat application is denied by the City Council, the Planning Commission or City Council shall not consider a similar application for a preliminary plat affecting substantially the same property again for at least 6 months from the date of its denial. Section 930 (Preliminary Plat Procedure) Page 17 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 Subd. 8. Expiration of Preliminary Plat Approval. Unless the City Council specifically approves a different time period, the approval of a preliminary plat shall expire one year from the date it was approved, unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat; or, unless before expiration of the one year period, the applicant submits a written request for an extension thereof. Such request for an extension shall include the following: 1) an explanation for why a final plat has not been applied for, 2) what, if any, good faith efforts have been made to complete the platting process, and 3) the anticipated completion date. The Zoning Administrator may approve up to 2 such extensions of not more than one additional year per extension. 930.020 - Application Requirements. The materials, information, and drawings required for submission of a preliminary plat application are listed in this section. In order for a preliminary plat application to be deemed complete, it shall include or have attached thereto all materials, information, and drawings listed in this section. Subd. 1. Application Form. The subdivider shall submit an official application form, as provided by the City, including the following information: A. Location, address (if assigned), legal description, and Hennepin County property identification number (P.I.N.) of all parcels included within the proposed plat. B. Name, address, telephone number, and signature of the subdivider and all persons currently having an ownership interest in the parcels comprising the proposed plat. C. Written description that provides information about the proposed plat including, but not limited to, number of lots, development type, and anticipated completion date. Such description may be provided on a separate sheet of paper that is attached to the application form. Subd. 2. Other Written Materials. The application form shall be accompanied by, or address, the following written materials: A. Estimated lot sizes for all lots and outlots in tabular form. B. Written verification that all commonly owned contiguous land is included in the plat. C. A wetland report by a Certified Wetland Specialist. Section 930 (Preliminary Plat Procedure) Page 18 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 Subd. 3. Fees and Cash Deposits. The fees shall accompany the application form as set forth in the Corcoran City Code. The applicant shall also deposit with the City the estimated cost of any consultant review of the preliminary plat that may be necessary to determine compliance with this Chapter or with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including but not limited to planning, engineering or traffic studies. Subd. 4. Drawings, General Requirements. A. Drawings must meet all following specifications: 1. Be at a scale of one inch equals fifty feet (1" = 50') or less using an engineer's scale only. All plan sheets shall be prepared using the same scale. 2. Be on paper not exceeding 24 -inch by 36 -inch. 3. Include a title, and north point indication, the name and address of the subdivider, and the name and address of the designer of the drawing. 4. Include a signature of the person who prepared the drawing, together with any registration number or other professional certification number or title. S. Provide the date of preparation and any revisions thereto. B. The subdivider shall provide complete full -sized (24 -inch by 36- inch) assembled sets of the drawings that are collated, stapled and rolled, the number of which shall be determined by the Zoning Administrator. C. The subdivider shall provide complete assembled sets of the drawings reduced to 11 -inch by 17 -inch, the number of which shall be determined by the Zoning Administrator. D. The subdivider shall provide one copy of the preliminary plat at a scale of one inch equals two hundred feet (1" = 200'). E. The subdivider shall submit electronic files of the drawings in a manner specified by the City in the Engineering Design Standards. The applicant may appeal directly to the City Council for a waiver of this requirement for subdivisions resulting in three or fewer parcels. No waiver shall be granted under this subsection unless the Council finds that the applicant and his surveyor do not have Section 930 (Preliminary Plat Procedure) Page 19 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 ready, economical access to the technology required to comply with the electronic filing requirement. Subd. 5. Drawings, Existing Conditions. The application form shall be accompanied by drawings and information indicating the following: A. An accurate certified survey of the proposed plat, current within one year, showing existing conditions and providing the current legal descriptions of all parcels within the proposed plat. B. Floodplain and shoreland district boundaries within the proposed plat. C. Gross acreage and net acreage of the proposed plat, computed to one -tenth of an acre. D. Location, width, and name of all existing streets, public ways, parks, and other public lands (including permanent structures), railroads, utility rights -of -way, corporate lines, and easements within the proposed plat, and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the boundary lines of such plat. E. Location and size of all existing buildings, as well as all sewers, watermains, culverts and other underground facilities (public and private) within the proposed plat, and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the boundary lines of such plat. Data such as grades, rim and invert elevations, locations of catch basins and manholes, and fire hydrants shall also be provided. F. Topography in 2 -foot contour intervals within the proposed plat, and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the boundary lines of such plat. G. Water courses, wetlands, marshes, wooded areas, rock outcrops, power transmission poles and lines, and other significant features within the proposed plat, and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the boundary lines of such plat. H. Boundary lines and ownership of all adjoining land within 100 feet. I. Existing guiding and zoning classifications for land within, and abutting, the proposed plat. J. Tree inventory identifying the trees to be removed or preserved. Section 930 (Preliminary Plat Procedure) Page 20 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 K. Soil borings and percolation tests, as may be required by the Building Official or City Engineer. Subd. 6. Drawings, Preliminary Plans. The application form shall be accompanied by drawings and information indicating the following: A. Preliminary plat, including the following: 1. Name of the proposed plat. 2. Layout of all proposed lot lines, together with the number, size, and preliminary dimensions, including the width of the lots at the front setback line. 3. Layout of all proposed streets, including those required in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, showing right - of -way widths, pavement widths, center line gradients, typical cross sections, street drainage systems, and proposed street names pursuant to the City's street naming system. 4. Location and width of all proposed sidewalks, trails, pedestrian ways, and fire lanes. S. Location, dimensions, and purpose of all easements. 6. Minimum building setback lines. 7. Areas other than streets, sidewalks, trails, pedestrian ways, and utility easements intended to be dedicated or reserved for private or public use, including the size of such area(s). 8. Floodplain and shoreland district boundaries within the proposed plat. 9. Proposed guiding and zoning classifications if the plat application includes a reguiding and /or rezoning request. 10. A tentative plan for future platting, if the proposed plat includes any areas intended for future re- subdivision. B. Preliminary grading and erosion control plan for the proposed plat, including the following: 1. Lot and block numbers, building pad locations, building style and proposed building pad elevations at the lowest floor and garage slab for each lot. Section 930 (Preliminary Plat Procedure) Page 21 Oe*�TNovember 21, 2011 2. Topography in 2 -foot contour intervals, with existing contours shown as dashed lines and proposed contours shown as solid lines. Existing topography shall extend 100 feet beyond the borders of the proposed plat. For lots greater than 3 acres, the Council may waive this topography requirement. 3. Location of all existing natural features on the tract including, but not limited to, tree lines, wetlands, ponds, lakes, streams, drainage channels, bluffs, steep slopes, etc. 4. Location of all existing and proposed storm sewer facilities, including pipes, manholes, catch basins, ponds, swales, and drainage channels within 100 feet of the proposed plat. Pipe type and size, pipe grades, rim and invert elevations, and normal high water elevations shall be included. S. Flood elevations and locations if the plat is located within, or adjacent to, a 100 -year flood plain. 6. Spot elevations at drainage break points and directional arrows indicating site and swale drainage. 7. Locations, grades, and rim invert elevations of all storm sewer facilities, including ponds, proposed to serve the plat. 8. Locations and elevations of all street high and low points. 9. Street grades. 10. Phasing of grading. 11. Location of all easements, including oversize or non - typical easements. 12. An erosion control plan, pursuant to Section 950 of this Chapter. C. Preliminary utility plan for the proposed plat, including the following: 1. Location, dimensions, and purpose of all easements. 2. Location, type, size, grades, and rim and invert elevations of existing and proposed sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water mains, culverts, catch basins, manholes, hydrants, and other Section 930 (Preliminary Plat Procedure) Page 22 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 similar facilities within the proposed plat and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the plat. 3. Schematic storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water layouts, illustrating invert and top rim elevations, proposed gradients, direction of flow, hydrant locations, and drainage areas. 4. Where applicable, a report prepared by a MPCA certified and licensed individual on the feasibility of individual on -site sewer and water systems on each lot and shall include soil boring analysis and percolation tests to verify conclusions, and other necessary information as regulated by State and City regulations. The report and findings shall be subject to review and approval by the City Building Official. D. Tree preservation plan for the proposed plat. The plan shall identify the location and type of trees and all existing trees to be preserved. Such plan shall also include proposed locations and details of tree protection fencing to be installed for all trees to be preserved. E. Other drawings required for the proposed plat, as follows: 1. Source of water supply. 2. Provisions for sewage disposal, drainage and flood control. 3. Location of proposed street lights, as well as the utilities of electricity, gas, telephone, and CATV. 4. A general landscaping plan showing plantings, berms, fences, walls, sidewalks and trails, and any subdivision signage. S. For plats containing one- or two - family dwellings, the location on each lot where an attached or detached garage containing at least one parking stall could be built within ordinance standards, if the principal structure is to be built without a garage. Section 930 (Preliminary Plat Procedure) Page 23 Oe*�TNovember 21, 2011 This page left intentionally blank. 1w Section 930 (Preliminary Plat Procedure) Page 24 ne*�TNovember 21, 2011 SECTION 935 - FINAL PLAT PROCEDURE 935.010 - Final Plat Procedure. An application for a final plat shall be approved or denied Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462.358. Subd. 1. Compliance with Preliminary Plat. A final plat application shall be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat, including any required modifications thereto. Subd. 2. Filing. A final plat application shall be filed with the Zoning Administrator on an official application form. The application shall be accompanied by the fee as set forth in the City Code. The application shall also be accompanied by detailed written and graphic materials, the number and size as prescribed by the Zoning Administrator, that describes the final plat. The application shall be considered as being officially submitted and complete when the subdivider has complied with all the specified submittal requirements, as described in this Section. Subd. 3. Staff Analysis. Upon receiving a complete application, as determined by staff review, the Zoning Administrator shall refer copies of the final plat to the City staff and other applicable public agencies as needed in order to receive written comments. The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff person to 1) coordinate an analysis of the application, 2) prepare technical reports and coordinate preparation of the development contract, and 3) assist in preparing a recommendation to the City Council. Subd. 4. City Council Consideration. The City Council shall consider a final plat as follows: A. Upon receiving the reports and recommendations of the staff, the City Administrator shall schedule the application for City Council consideration. The Council shall have the option of receiving additional testimony on the matter if they so choose. B. The City Council shall either approve or deny the application. C. Approval of a final plat and any related development contract by the City Council shall require passage by a majority vote of th-e all its membersentiFe City Council. The Council may require such revisions in the final plat as it deems necessary for the health, safety, general welfare and convenience of the City. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 25 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 D. If a final plat is denied by the City Council, the reasons for such action shall be recorded in the Council proceedings and transmitted to the applicant within 60 days. Subd. S. Recording of Final Plat. If the final plat is approved and signed by the Mayor and City officials, the subdivider shall record the final plat with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles. No changes, erasures, modifications or revisions shall be made in any final plat after approval has been given by the City Council and endorsed in writing on the plat. Subd. 6. Effect of Approval. For 2 years following final plat approval, unless the subdivider and City agree otherwise, no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or other official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, or lot layout that was approved. Subd. 7. Expiration of Final Plat Approval. Unless the City Council specifically approves a different time period, the approval of a final plat shall expire 2 years from the date it was approved, unless the applicant has recorded the final plat with Hennepin County; or, unless before expiration of the 2 -year period, the applicant submits a written request for an extension thereof. Such request for an extension shall include the following: 1) an explanation for why a final plat has not been filed, 2) what, if any, good faith efforts have been made to complete the platting process, and 3) the anticipated completion date. The Zoning Administrator may approve one such extension for a term not to exceed one additional year. 935.020 - Application Requirements. The materials, information, and drawings required for submission of a final plat application are listed in this section. In order for a final plat application to be deemed complete, it shall include or have attached thereto all materials, information, and drawings listed in this section. Subd. 1. Application Form. The subdivider shall submit an official application form, as provided by the City, including the following information: A. Location, address (if assigned), legal description, and Hennepin County property identification number (P.I.N.) of all parcels included within the proposed plat. B. Name, address, telephone number, and signature of the subdivider and all persons currently having an ownership interest in the parcels comprising the proposed plat. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 26 Oc*�TNovember 21, 2011 C. Written description that indicates compliance with the approved preliminary plat and all related conditions of approval thereto. If the proposed final plat varies from the approved preliminary plat, the nature and extent of the variation must be described. Such description may be provided on a separate sheet of paper that is attached to the application form. Subd. 2. Other Written Materials. The application form shall be accompanied by, or address, the following written materials: A. Three specification books for construction of public improvements. B. Cost estimates for grading and all public improvements. C. Lot sizes for all lots and outlots in tabular form. D. A copy of any proposed homeowners association documents, private covenants or deed restrictions. Subd. 3. Fees and Deposits. The fees shall accompany the application form as set forth in the Corcoran City Code. The applicant shall also deposit with the City the estimated cost of any consultant review of the final plat that may be necessary to determine compliance with this Chapter or with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including but not limited to planning, engineering or traffic studies. Subd. 4. Drawings, General Requirements. A. Drawings must meet all following specifications: 1. Be at a scale of one inch equals fifty feet (1" = 50') or less using an engineer's scale only. 2. Be on paper not exceeding 24- inches by 36- inches. 3. Include a title, and north point indication, the name and address of the subdivider, and the name and address of the designer of the drawing. 4. Include a signature of the person who prepared the drawing, together with any registration number or other professional certification number or title. 5. Provide the date of preparation and any revisions thereto. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 27 Oc*�TNovember 21, 2011 B. The subdivider shall provide complete full -sized (24- inches by 36- inches) assembled sets of the drawings that are collated and stapled, the number of which shall be determined by the Zoning Administrator. C. Reductions: The subdivider shall provide complete, assembled sets of the drawings reduced to 11- inches by 17- inches, the number of which shall be determined by the Zoning Administrator. D. The subdivider shall provide one copy of the final plat at a scale of one inch equals two hundred feet (1" = 200'). E. The subdivider shall submit electronic files of the drawings in a manner specified by the City in the Engineering Design Standards. The applicant may appeal directly to the City Council for a waiver of this requirement for subdivisions resulting in three or fewer parcels. No waiver shall be granted under this subsection unless the Council finds that the applicant and his surveyor do not have ready, economical access to the technology required to comply with the electronic filing requirement. Subd. 5. Drawings, Existing Conditions. The application form shall be accompanied by drawings and information indicating the following: A. An accurate certified survey of the proposed plat, current within one year of the date of application, showing existing conditions and providing the current legal descriptions of all parcels within the proposed plat. B. Floodplain and shoreland district boundaries within the proposed plat. C. Gross acreage and net acreage of the proposed plat, computed to one -tenth of an acre. D. Location, width, and name of all existing streets, public ways, parks, and other public lands (including permanent structures), railroads, utility rights -of -way, corporate lines, and easements within the proposed plat, and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the boundary lines of such plat. Subd. 6. Drawings, Final Plans. The application form shall be accompanied by drawings and information indicating the following: A. Final plat, including the following: Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 28 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 1. Name of the proposed plat. 2. Layout of all proposed lot lines with dimensions, and lot and block numbers. 3. Layout of all proposed streets, showing right -of -way widths and street names pursuant to the City's street naming system. 4. Location, dimensions, and purpose of all easements. 5. Areas other than streets, sidewalks, trails, pedestrian ways, and utility easements intended to be dedicated or reserved for private or public use, including the size of such area(s). 6. Certification by a registered surveyor, as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, as maybe amended. 7. Space for signatures of all owners of any interest in the land and holders of a mortgage thereon, in the format prescribed by Hennepin County. 8. Space for certificates of approval to be filled in by the signatures of the Mayor and City Engineer, together with space for the attestation of such signatures by the City Clerk. 9. Space for certificates of approval and review, in the format prescribed by Hennepin County. B. Final grading and drainage plan for the proposed plat, including the following: 1. Lot and block numbers, building pad locations, building style and proposed building pad elevations at the lowest floor and garage slab for each lot. 2. Topography in two -foot contour intervals, with existing contours shown as dashed lines and proposed contours shown as solid lines. Existing topography shall extend 100 feet beyond the borders of the proposed plat. 3. Location of all existing natural features on the tract including, but not limited to, tree lines, wetlands, ponds, lakes, streams, drainage channels, bluffs, steep slopes, etc. 4. Location of all existing and proposed storm sewer facilities, including pipes, manholes, catch basins, ponds, swales, and Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 29 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 drainage channels within 100 feet of the proposed plat. Pipe type and size, pipe grades, rim and invert elevations, and normal and high water elevations shall be included. S. Flood elevations and locations if the plat is located within, or adjacent to, a 100 -year flood plain. 6. Spot elevations at drainage break points and directional arrows indicating site and swale drainage, and emergency overflow locations, elevations and routes. 7. Locations, grades, and rim invert elevations of all storm sewer facilities, including ponds and rain gardens, proposed to serve the plat. 8. Locations and elevations of all street high and low points. 9. Street grades. 10. Phasing of grading. 11. Benchmark elevations. 12. Location and elevation of all retaining walls. 13. Location of all easements, including oversize or non - typical easements. 14. An erosion control plan, pursuant to Section 950 of this Chapter. C. Final utility plan for the proposed plat, including the following: 1. Location, dimensions, and purpose of all easements. 2. Location, size, grades, and rim and invert elevations of existing and proposed sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water mains, culverts, catch basins, man holes, hydrants, and other similar facilities within the proposed plat and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the plat. 3. Storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water layouts, including top rim and invert elevations, proposed gradients, direction of flow, hydrant locations, drainage areas and benchmark elevations. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 30 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 4. Profiles for all proposed utilities. D. Tree preservation plan for the proposed plat. The plan shall identify the location and type of trees and all existing trees to be preserved. Such plan shall also include proposed locations and details of tree protection fencing to be installed for all trees to be preserved. E. Other drawings required for the proposed plat, as follows: 1. Location of proposed street lights, as well as the utilities of electricity, gas, telephone, and CATV. 2. A general landscaping plan showing plantings, berms, fences, walls, sidewalks and trails, and any subdivision signage. F. Final street plan for the proposed plat, including the following: 1. Plan view of proposed and existing streets including location, dimensions, and purpose of all rights of way and easements, location of existing or proposed utilities. 2. Street profiles including existing and proposed elevations extended to show how they tie into the adjacent properties. 3. Street cross - section and design information based on the soil r- value. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 31 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 32 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 .. and Section 9335 of the Sul,r iyision h cclli be- c"lriv`vcIRCI vrF an open space pt!eserw-ition plat with the addition tion of the foilonirrt• Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 33 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 0 I .. and Section 9335 of the Sul,r iyision h cclli be- c"lriv`vcIRCI vrF an open space pt!eserw-ition plat with the addition tion of the foilonirrt• Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 33 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 1 11 RIM 11111 NNW. I 7 Sol types and characteristics, such as depth tv �l cc-arto table. • IL': 7:* T. EI :�I:�SSLSlI�:S'TET.�:LS�IS�l:tr ..... Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 34 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 1 101 W. d. Visual Fe- `rOUFeCSStiOW'ng -` ieilx-r, A-Pt-:A- t-h P- tc"ruact- ti-vrir 1 as Nvell as views within tile tFact. . .............. ....... • d. Visual Fe- `rOUFeCSStiOW'ng -` ieilx-r, A-Pt-:A- t-h P- tc"ruact- ti-vrir 1 as Nvell as views within tile tFact. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 35 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 . .............. ....... Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 35 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 • • . sou.. ti The City shall have the option of ren„iring that She- Fel;ne v. , aFeas along streams, or- -irons in natural recniirne nnrridnro he eluded as preserved open space, Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 36 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 :E71 ■. . M. m,.rw -� 10. Any other- matters the Eleyel. pep OF city Elee Ito shall be included. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 37 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 WN ME 10. Any other- matters the Eleyel. pep OF city Elee Ito shall be included. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 37 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 FFM Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 38 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 38 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 lSd:V.V.m B� . Mm MW SM Me Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 39 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 I Pi 1 � � 7 Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 40 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 . ........... Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 40 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 common open s ace facilities shall be as pr-ovided in this i-liyisinn WheFe certain land aFeas nr stri.rtur -es are pFevided within the Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 41 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 interest, successor- in PRIM LM AOpen Space DNeseFvation Plats must pFovide paved access to the &4e Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 42 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 - i�1i" IIwII, I iii �, Ili,. i��li if interest, successor- in PRIM LM AOpen Space DNeseFvation Plats must pFovide paved access to the &4e Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 42 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 . :Lim:2110pfflElarr- r.w.MR. WHIM P.TT.vgwzmriiLSI�:S I i 1 1 1 ■.. IN. 1 ........... SL1t� 11 i i 1 • 'iii - al w 1 E. Providing covenants to ate an rel„teet„ral theme to ; elude ;toms such as landscaping, por -ches 1 side or- roar leaded nr Eletached gaFages (up to ca 10 per-cent bonus) Landscape theme, Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 43 Oc o�TNovember 21, 2011 NO �.., ..� SECTION 940 - OPEN SPACE AND PRESERVATION (OS &P) PLATS Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 44 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 940.010 - Purpose of Division. The purpose of Open Space and Preservation plats (OS &P) is to minimize acreage used in developments that are approved prior to availability of urban services and to improve and preserve wildlife habitat, duality of life and land values within the City through economic incentives to preserve high duality woodlands, interconnected vegetated corridors, agricultural land, open space, and other significant natural features as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. OS &P plats provide owners within the rural residential zoning district with added flexibility in designing plats as well as incentives to voluntarily protect, preserve, enhance or restore natural resources on their property. OS &P Plats includes three application types beyond the basic development type, based on the amount of permanently preserved open space. Each application type includes some development right bonus. In addition to encouraging natural resource preservation and restoration, OS &P plats are intended as a means of facilitating an orderly and economically viable transition to eventual development with urban services. 940.020 - Objectives of Division and Definitions. Subd. 1. The objectives of this division are to: A. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. B. Preserve permanent natural habitat and vegetated corridors for the shelter and movement of diverse wildlife. C. Preserve viable tracts of land for long -term agricultural use. D. Allow greater flexibility in the design of residential developments in order to create a more esthetically pleasing visual impact than standard development, particularly along arterial roadways and with respect to abutting properties. E. Create cohesive neighborhoods to establish local identity and increase community interaction. F. Reduce the costs of future public road and utility infrastructure through designing to improve the efficiency of future connections and minimize site restoration costs associated with future utility construction. G. Provide economic incentives to land owners to preserve, protect and /or restore high duality woodlots and other identified natural resources areas. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 45 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 H. Accomplish the objectives of the comprehensive plan in a voluntary manner through the use of incentives. 940.030 Application Types. Subd.1. Four application types are available, three of which are an OS &P development with development right bonuses as indicated below: A. Standard Plat: 100% of development rights. B. OS &P with no permanent preservation or restoration: Lots clustered and in acceptable lot sizes to accommodate private septic system = 150% of development rights. C. OS &P with permanent preservation and or restoration: Lots clustered and in acceptable lot sizes to accommodate private septic system and a minimum of 25% of gross land area shall be preserved or restored and of that. 50% shall be upland area. _ 200% of development rights. D. OS &P with permanent preservation and or restoration and other provisions as required in "C" with community well and septic under a PUD = 300% of development rights Subd 2. Lands within the Greenwav corridor as identified on natural resource maps in the Comprehensive Plan qualify for OS &P plats. Other areas have been identified as target areas by the City within the MUSA and in rural residential areas. These areas are indicated on overlay natural resource maps attached to the Comprehensive Plan. A parcel outside one of these categories may apply for permanent preservation or restoration and, if the proposed permanent preservation or restoration is approved by the City, receive the applicable development right bonus as approved by the City. Preservation and restoration areas shall follow the City's adopted Design Standards for Preservation and Restoration lands. Subd 3. Any Application type can develop in stages based on the approved plat. Subd 4. A Planned Unit Development (PUD) will be required for any application type that proposes a deviation from minimum lot size and f or the use of off -lot septic or well or community septic or well. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 46 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 940.040 - Procedure. Subd. 1. All procedures for a standard subdivision as provided in Section 930 and Section 935 of the Subdivision Ordinance shall be followed for each type of open space preservation plat application, with the addition of the following: A. A pre - application meeting with the City and potential easement holders in order for all parties to be made fully aware of any procedures, policies, or other issues regarding the plat. B. A sketch /concept plan shall be required that includes the following: 1. Classification by wetland type and acreage of all wetlands with and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the boundary lines of such plat. 2. Vegetation of the site (pasture, woodlands, hedgerows, etc.j including a general description of species of trees and a summary of the approximate percent of each species and their size and stage of maturity. 3. An outline of the land area to be designated as open space and its proposed use as park, trail, temporary open space, permanent preserve or restoration, or wastewater treatment area. C. Data for preliminary plat. All information required to be submitted in Section 930 is required to be submitted with any OS &P application, with the addition of the following 1. A resource inventory presented on an aerial photograph at a scale of no less than one inch equals 200 feet, including the following: a. Vegetation inventory identifying the general cover types defining boundaries of woodland areas and identifying stand -alone trees of a size and species identified in the City preservation and restoration standards as significant. b. Trees or wooded areas to be removed for streets, drives, buildings, drainage or other purposes shall be identified. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 47 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 c. Visual resources, showing views onto the tract from surrounding roads and public areas, as well as views within the tract. d. Description of the historic character of buildings and structures, historically important landscapes, and known archeological features. e. Context, including general outlines of existing buildings, land uses and natural features such as water bodies or wooded areas, roads and property boundaries within 100 feet of the tract. 2. A calculation of the proposed open space or preservation plat density as determined by Section 940.070. 3. A narrative from the applicant as to the rationale behind the proposed layout and open space. 4. An itemized list of all documents, agreements and actions necessary to be completed prior to recording of the plat, including land area to be protected with a conservation easement as open space or park dedication, the number and size of lots, areas proposed for stormwater management and sewage treatment areas (primary and secondary). This shall include all applicable Homeowners' association documents (if any), including bylaws, deed restrictions, covenants, and proposed conservation easements, prepared or approved by the holder of the conservation easement. 940.050 - Development Standards. Subd. 1. OS &P or restoration plats shall comply with the following minimum standards: A. Land area. 1. Minimum gross acreage is determined based on a wastewater treatment plan. On -site treatment will require appropriate setbacks and a primary and secondary wastewater treatment /disposal site. 2. Under an OS &P with no permanent preservation or restoration, land not used in the development may be retained by the owner and any successor in interest, subject to a Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 48 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 covenant with the City that such land may not be developed until such time as urban sewer service is provided and at such time shall be subject to development standards with urban densities. Continued agricultural use shall be permitted until such time as sewer and water are available and orderly urban development occurs. 3. Under an OS &P plat a minimum of 25% percent of the gross land area (of no more than two pieces) of the development site shall be dedicated as preserved open space (either temporary_ or permanent). Permanent open space must be protected by a conservation easement or deed restrictions in favor of the city. Of that amount. 50 percent (net 12.5 %) shall be upland area. Wetland restoration (including abandonment of legally tiled areas) will be credited towards the 12.5% upland. One acre of restored wetland shall equal one acre of upland. B. Open space development standards. Open space to be permanently preserved or restored within an OS &P plan shall meet the following criteria: 1. Open spaces shall be protected by the placement of a conservation easement, covenant or deed restriction in favor of the City over the open space. 2. Open space shall be owned by an individual, a homeowners' association, the City or other legal entity that will use the land for open space purposes pursuant to a conservation easement or covenant restricting additional development until urban services are provided (only applies to open space in excess of required 25 %). In the case of private ownership of open space where public access is desired, such as a trail crossing or other public purpose, the City shall require that a public easement be provided over the open space area. 3. In the event that it is impossible to locate sufficient suitable building sites to use the development rights generated by the property and plat design, such rights may be transferred to an adjacent property, within the city, so long as the development rights are used in a development that also follows open space development standards and does not exceed a 35% increase in development intensity compared to the property without transferred -in development rights. A PUD will be required for any OS &P desiring to transfer development rights. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 49 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 4. A preservation, restoration and management plan agreeable to the City shall be prepared and filed for open space land. This plan shall include areas proposed for interim agricultural uses as well as permanent easements. a. The City Council may, at its discretion, require financial guarantees of performance of restoration, seeding, cutting or planting. b. Where land remains in the ownership of the developer or an association, the City may inspect the property at any time to ensure that provisions of the management plan are being implemented. c. The City shall adopt a model restoration and management plan that may be adapted as appropriate to each situation. C. Water and sewer systems. 1. Water may be provided by individual on -site wells, or by one or more community wells in open space areas, meeting all State Department of Health requirements. 2. Individual sewage treatment systems are required to be located on each individual lot, except as otherwise approved by the City Council. The developer must identify both primarX and secondary locations for City planning review. Permitting of individual septic systems shall be through Hennepin County_. Individual sewage systems shall not be located on land with permanent preservation or restoration easements or land dedicated to the City. 3. The City may approve a centralized wastewater treatment system and smaller individual lots as part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), provided the applicant can show compliance with MPCA standards and the City finds that the proposal would comply with PUD standards, all City requirements and would have no adverse impact on the environment or neighboring properties. The City will review the following information as part of the plan review, but all permitting shall be as required by the State of Minnesota. Centralized wastewater treatment systems may be located in temporarily restricted open space within an easement. This area shall not be included in the land area designated as preserved or restored open space. A sewage treatment system management plan must be submitted to the city that must be Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 50 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 reviewed and approved prior to being recorded with the final plat. The plan shall clearly identify the following_ a. The applicant must provide the following information to support the proposed primary and secondary septic sites: i. Hydrologic study prepared by a qualified individual for the proposed septic site. ii. A minimum of 4 soil borings on each primary septic site and 2 soil borings on each secondary site. iii. Percolation tests for the primary septic site. iv. Well locations for the proposed development. b. The applicant must provide a management (maintenance, replacement and repair) plan for centralized wastewater treatment system as approved by the City. The management plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Council and recorded with the final plat. The plan should clearly identify the following_ i. The ownership of the centralized wastewater treatment system. ii. An annual schedule for maintenance, inspection and monitoring of the centralized wastewater treatment system. iii. Assignment of responsibility for the management of and payment for the centralized wastewater treatment system. iv. Contingency plan in the event of failure of the centralized wastewater treatment. v. Financial guarantees, covering the estimated cost of maintaining and replacing a centralized system. vi. Provisions describing how the sewage treatment portion of the system will be protected from vehicles, animals, humans and other sources of risk. vii. The name and license number of the system's designer. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 51 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 viii. Provision for cost effective future connection of the wastewater treatment system(s) to urban services within one year after such services are provided at the boundary of the development, with sufficient financial guarantees to ensure no added cost to the City. ix. If financial guarantees for any of the above provisions are part of an association assessment or treasury fund, the City shall be given access to annual audit records, at the expense of the association, to ensure proper funding. If such guarantees are the private responsibility of the developer. the City shall require guarantees from the responsible individual(s). D. Dimensional regulations and Development standards. The dimensional regulations for open space preservation plats must comply with standards of the underlying zoning district, but may be reduced from the underlying zoning district dimensional regulations provided they comply with the following minimums: 1. Minimum lot size. The applicant must provide information to show that a primary and secondary septic site can fit on the site or on adjacent property in compliance with ordinance requirements. 2. Building setbacks. Building setbacks shall be as follows: a. Front: Front line of home shall be within 75' of front property line (unless adjacent to an arterial street, which has minimum setback of 100 feet from major roads. Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever and A Minor Expander Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.). b. Side. internal: 15 feet. c. Side. street: 25 feet. d. Rear: 25 feet. 3. Maximum impervious surface. Maximum impervious surface within each lot shall be 25 percent. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 52 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 4. Variations from the dimensional requirements for lot size, setbacks or impervious surface may be approved by the City_ Council PUD if the City Council finds that the request is consistent with the PUD standards. S. Street standards. Street standards shall comply with this article. 6. Accessory structures (such as gazebos, benches and play equipment) shall be allowed on preserved open space lots without a principal structure as provided for in the developer's agreement and approved by the City Council. 7. A buffer zone of at least 100 feet shall be provided at the perimeter of the developed area of the site abutting public streets. The buffer zone shall be thickly planted with native grasses, shrubs and trees to minimize land use conflicts. E. Development design guidelines applicable to all OSP developments with no .permanent preservation of open space: 1. All lots shall be clustered in a manner to create temporary .open space that will be held in a covenant for future development at the time sewer is extended. 2. The temporary open space shall be contiguous land, or adjacent to a similarly classified property, in order to facilitate future development. 3. A ghost plat shall be designed for all temporary open space areas at the same time as the Preliminary and Final plat is review and approved. The ghost plats shall indicate future access, internal road network and connections and future lot layout. 4. All lots shall front a paved road, internal to the site. F. Development design guidelines applicable to all OS &P developments with permanent preservation or restoration of open space. Residential lots should be designed to achieve as many of the following objectives as possible: 1. Arrange lots around a central focal point such as: a. A central green, boulevard or square. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 53 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 b. A physical amenity such as a meadow, a stand of trees, a stream or water body, or some other natural feature. 2. Locate lots such that at least 50 percent of the lots within a neighborhood abut open space, or other amenity, on at least one side. A local street may separate lots from open space. 3. Preserve views from each building unit and from off -site vantage points to the maximum possible. 4. Locate neighborhood recreational open spaces such that they are an integral part of the neighborhood, are suitable for the projected demographic makeup of residents, are at an elevation appropriate to their intended recreational use, have boundaries that are clearly defined and are accessible to all neighborhood residents from a public street or trail. Connect individual home sites with pedestrian corridors or sidewalks to larger open spaces and places of destination on -site and off - site. Open spaces should be accessible to pedestrians at roughly 1.200 -foot intervals along public roadways. Pedestrian corridors between lots shall be at least 50 feet in width and buffered from view of adjacent properties. S. Locate lots to preserve woodlands, farmland or other natural features or character, including places of historic, archeological or cultural value. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan to the maximum extent possible in a contiguous, connected configuration. Natural open spaces may include, but are not limited to, fields, wetlands, slopes, bluffs, woods, lakes, ponds, streams, shore lands, and other environmentally sensitive areas. 6. Providing covenants to create an architectural theme to include items such as landscaping, porches, side or rear loaded or detached garages. A written narrative describing the architectural theme shall be provided with the preliminary plat. 7. Locate houses and garages such that the garages do not dominate the streetscape. 8. Locate septic systems on the most suitable soils for subsurface septic disposal and in such manner as to provide for cost effective and least disruptive future connection of the wastewater treatment system(s) to urban services. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 54 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 9. Landscape common areas and street rights -of -way with native vegetation with high wildlife conservation value. 940.060 - Ownership of Common Areas, Subd. 1. Operation and maintenance requirements for residential subdivision common open space facilities shall be as provided in this division. Where certain land areas or structures are provided within the subdivision for private recreational use or as common service facilities or centralized wastewater treatment systems, the owner of such land and buildings shall provide covenants as approved by the City to ensure their continued operation and maintenance to a predetermined reasonable standard. These common areas may be placed under the ownership of one of the following, depending upon which is more appropriate in the discretion of the cites A. Dedicated to the public where a community -wide use would be anticipated: or B. Subdivider's ownership and control: or C. Homeowners' associations. A homeowners' association shall be established to maintain all permanently preserved open space and recreational facilities, except in cases where the land is dedicated to the City for public purposes. Such homeowners' association management agreements shall be established prior to the sale of anv lots. Homeowners' association management agreements shall include the followin 1. The agreement shall include a legal description of the common lands, facilities and permanent open space. 2. The permanent open space restrictions must be in perpetuitX and not for a specific term of years. 3. Membership in the association shall be mandatory for all purchasers of homes in the development and their successors. 4. The agreement shall include restrictions placed upon the use and enjoyment of the lands or facilities, including the persons or entities entitled to enforce the restrictions. 5. The agreement shall include a mechanism for resolving disputes among the owners or association members. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 55 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 6. The agreement shall provide standards for scheduled maintenance of open spaces, buildings and facilities. The association must be responsible for liability insurance and local taxes, 7. The agreement shall provide a plan guaranteeing continuing maintenance of open spaces that shall be submitted to the city council as part of the data requirements for an open space development. 8. The agreement shall include a mechanism to assess and enforce the common expenses for the land or facilities, including upkeep and maintenance expenses, real estate taxes and insurance premiums. 9. The agreement shall include the conditions and timing of the transfer of ownership and control of land or facilities to the association or the common ownership. 10. The homeowners must pa, their heir pro rata share of associated costs and the assessment levied by the association shall become a lien on the property in accordance with the law: and 11. The association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed circumstances and needs 12. Any roposed change in the articles of association or incorporation shall require the prior written approval of the City. 13. Any other matters the developer or City deems appropriate shall be included. 940.070 - Calculation of Base Density: Density Bonuses. Subd. 1. To calculate the allowed density for a given parcel for open space preservation plat purposes, the following shall apply: A. OS &P Plats (all application types) must provide paved access within the site and must require all owners and their successors to covenant that they will participate at 100% of the per unit cost of future assessments for paving to City standards the principal roads servicing the site, if those roads are not currently paved. Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 56 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 B. Development rights shall be as recorded on the official City of Corcoran "Development Rights Map" and as described in Section 1040.030, Subd. 7 (Density Requirements) of the Zoning Ordinance. C. Multiply the number of development rights on the parcel by the percent based on the application type to determine the maximum number of lots. Percentages are as follows: 1. Standard Plat: = 100% of development rights (1 in 10 or 1 in 30 2. OS &P design with no permanent preservation or restoration = 150% 3. OS &P with permanent preservation and or restoration = 200% 4. OS &P with community well and septic (subject to PUD) _ 300% Example 1: Gross land area consisting of approximately 46 acres in a 1 in 10 density district. Standard Plat: 46 x 1 (100% of development rights) = 4.6 development rights which is rounded up to S. OS &P with no permanent dedication = (46110) x 1.5 (150% of development rights) = 6.9 development rights which is rounded up to 7. OS &P with permanent dedication= (46110) x 2.0 (200% of development rights) = 9.2 development rights, which rounds down to 9. OS &P with permanent dedication and community well and septic = (46110) x 3.0 (300% of development rights) = 13.8 development rights, which rounds up to 14. Maximum density = 46114 = 1 in 3.29 Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 57 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 Example 2: Gross land area consisting of approximately 60 acres in a 1 in 10 density district. Standard Plat: 6 x 1 (100% of development rights) = 6 development rights OS &P with no permanent dedication = (60/10) x 1.5 (150% of development rights) = 9 development rights. OS &P with permanent dedication = (60/10) x 2.0 (200% of development rights) = 12 development rights. OS &P with permanent dedication and community well and septic = (60110) x 3.0 (300% of development rights) = 18 development rights. Maximum density = 60/18 = 1 in 3.33 (Ord. 212, passed 12- 21 -04, Ord. 224, passed 10- 27 -05) Section 940 (Open Space and Preservation Plats) Page 58 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 SECTION 945 - DESIGN STANDARDS 945.010 - General Standards. Subd. 1. Contiguous Land. A preliminary plat shall include all of the owner's contiguous land, unless subdivision of property contiguous to the subdivision would be premature as defined by this Chapter. If subdivision of the contiguous property owned by the applicant would be premature, the applicant shall submit a sketch plan with enough detail to demonstrate how that property can be subdivided in the future in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and this Chapter. Final platting may be accomplished in phases. Subd. 2. Subdivisions Straddling Municipal Boundaries. Whenever access to the subdivision is required across land in another city, the City shall request assurance from the affected city that access is legally established and that the access road is adequately improved or that a guarantee has been duly executed and is sufficient in amount to assure the construction of the access road. In general, lot lines should be laid out so as not to cross municipal boundary lines. Subd. 3. Monuments. A. Official permanent monuments shall be placed as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.02 (as maybe amended). B. All monument markers shall be correctly in place upon final grading and installation of utilities. C. The City will not issue building permits for a lot within a plat until monuments have been placed for that lot. D. All United States, state, county or other official benchmarks, monuments or triangulation stations in or adjacent to the property shall be preserved in precise position. Subd. 4. Subdivision Names. The proposed name of the subdivision shall not duplicate or too closely approximate phonetically, the name of any other subdivision in the City. The City shall have final authority to designate the name of the subdivision. Subd. S. Engineering Design Standards. Public and private improvements shall comply with standards set forth in the City's Engineering Design Standards, which are herein adopted by reference. Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 59 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 945.020 - Lot Improvements. Subd. 1. Lot Arrangement. The lot arrangement shall be such that there will be no foreseeable difficulties, for reasons of topography or other conditions, in securing building permits to build on all lots in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, all lots shall abut and have direct access to an improved street except for developments with unit lots, in which case the base lot shall abut and have direct access to an improved street. Subd. 2. Minimum Lot Dimensions. All lot dimensions shall comply with the minimum standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Depth and width of properties reserved or laid out for commercial, office or industrial purposes shall be adequate to provide for the off - street parking and loading facilities required for the type of use contemplated, as established in the Zoning Ordinance, except as may be modified within a duly approved planned unit development (PUD). Subd. 3. Side Lot Lines. Side lines of lots shall be substantially at right angles to street lines and substantially radial to curved street lines, unless an alternative layout will result in a better street or lot plan. Subd. 4. Corner Lots. Corner lots shall be of sufficient width and depth to comply with the minimum building setback requirement from both streets and to comply with the minimum driveway setback from the intersection, as established in the Zoning Ordinance. Subd. S. Through or Double Frontage Lots and Access to Lots. A. Through or Double Frontage Lots. Through or double frontage lots shall not be permitted except where lots back on an arterial roadway or where specific disadvantages of topography or other conditions render subdividing otherwise unreasonable. B. Access from Minor Arterials and Minor Collectors. Lots shall not, in general, derive access exclusively from a minor arterial or major collector roadway. No lot parallel to a minor arterial or major collector roadway and having a width of less than 200 feet should front on these roadways unless 1) access is limited to streets other than a minor arterial or major collector, 2) access is provided jointly with other lots or 3) access is ultimately to be provided from a planned frontage road. Where possible, driveways shall be designed and arranged so as to avoid requiring vehicles to back into traffic on minor arterial or major collector roadways. Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 60 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 Subd. 6. Lots Abutting Water. Lots abutting a water body, wetland, drainage way, channel, stream or pond shall be of sufficient width and depth and at the elevation needed to assure that building sites are not subject to flooding. The platting of lots within the floodplain is subject to the Zoning Ordinance provisions relating thereto. Subd. 7. Large Tracts. When a parcel of land is subdivided into larger tracts than for building lots, such tracts shall be divided so as to allow for the opening of major streets and the ultimate extension of adjacent streets and utilities. Subd. 8. Lot Remnants. All remnants of land which are below the minimum lot size or which are otherwise unbuildable must be added to adjacent lots and shall not be platted as an unusable outlot or parcel. Subd. 9. Soil Preservation, Grading and Sodding /Seeding. A. Lot Drainage. Lots shall be laid out so as to provide positive drainage away from all buildings, and individual lot drainage shall be coordinated with the general storm drainage pattern for the area. Where possible, drainage shall be designed so as to avoid concentration of storm water drainage from each lot to adjacent lots. B. Sodding /Seeding. Sodding and seeding shall be done in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and Engineering Design Standards. Subd. 10. Debris and Waste. No cut trees, diseased trees, timber, debris, earth, rocks, stones, soil, junk, rubbish, former building foundations, abandoned wells, abandoned septic systems or other waste materials of any kind shall be buried in any land, or left or deposited on any lot or street at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, and removal of those items and materials shall be required prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy in a subdivision. No items and materials as described in the preceding sentence shall be left or deposited in any area of the subdivision at the time of expiration of the Development Contract or dedication of public improvements, whichever occurs sooner. Subd. 11. Waterbodies and Watercourses. If a tract being subdivided contains a water body, or portion thereof, lot lines shall be so drawn as to distribute the entire ownership of the water body among the fees of adjacent lots. The City may approve an alternative plan whereby the ownership of and responsibility for safe maintenance of Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 61 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 the water body is so placed that it will not become a City responsibility. Subd.12. Access. A. Block length and width or acreage within bounding streets shall be sufficient to accommodate the size of lots required by the Zoning Ordinance and to provide for convenient access, circulation control and safety of street traffic. 1. In the municipal urban service boundary, block lengths shall not exceed 900 feet nor be less than 500 feet, measured from the centerlines of streets, except where topography or other conditions justify a departure from that standard. 2. In the rural areas, block lengths shall not exceed 1,320 feet nor be less than 400 feet, except where topography or other conditions justify a departure from that standard. In blocks longer than 800 feet, pedestrian walkways and /or easements at least 10 feet wide may be required near the center of the block. B. Vehicle access shall be prohibited from a stub street to adjoining lots until such time as the stub street is extended into an adjoining tract, or unless a temporary cul -de -sac is provided. C. When a proposed plat contains or borders on the right -of -way of an existing or planned principal or minor arterial roadway, the City Council may require dedication and installation of a street approximately parallel to and on each side of such right -of -way for adequate protection of properties and to afford a separation of local and through traffic. Such streets shall be located at a distance from the major roadway suitable for the appropriate use of any intervening land. Such distance shall also be determined with due regard for the requirements of approach connections, future grade separations, and lot depths. D. The subdivider shall provide access to all lots via local streets. When a proposed plat contains or borders on the right -of -way of a principal arterial, vehicle access points shall be restricted in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the access requirements of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Hennepin County. When a proposed plat contains or borders on the right -of -way of a minor arterial or major collector roadway, vehicle access points shall be restricted from such roadways. If access onto a minor arterial or major collector is the only option Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 62 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 for access and is therefore required, such vehicle access points shall be limited from individual lots onto such streets through the use of shared driveways, consistent with the access management provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan. E. Access to minor arterial and major collector streets shall be at intervals of not less than 1/4 mile, and through existing and established crossroads where possible. In the platting of small tracts of land fronting on minor arterial streets where there is no other alternative, a temporary access permit may be granted. As neighboring land becomes subdivided and access to other streets becomes possible, such temporary access permit shall become void. F. When a residential lot has frontage on multiple streets, access to such lot shall be prohibited from higher -order streets (e.g., a lot that fronts on a minor arterial street and a collector street shall be prohibited from having access on the minor arterial street, and a lot that fronts on a collector street and a local street shall be prohibited from having access on the collector street). Subd. 13. Street Names. Street names shall be designated by the City street naming system, as administered by the Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator shall have discretion to alter the City street naming system, when appropriate, in order to avoid confusion to the traveling public. A petition to rename a street shall require action by the City Council. Subd. 14. Street Regulatory Signs. Street signs of standard design approved by the City shall be installed at each street intersection or at such other locations within the subdivision as designated by the City Engineer. Subd. 15. Traffic Control Signs. Traffic control signs pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 169.06, shall be installed at locations within the subdivision as designated by the City Engineer. Subd. 16. Turn Lanes and Traffic Lights. Turn lanes and traffic lights shall be installed at the expense of the subdivider when required as a result of the proposed subdivision. The cost of the improvements shall be apportioned among benefiting properties as determined by the City. Subd. 17. Street Lights. Street lights shall be installed at all intersections and at other locations, as required by the City Engineer. All street lights within new subdivisions in the urban area shall be on ornamental Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 63 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 poles with underground electrical service, and shall conform to City lighting standards. Subd. 18. Sidewalks and Trails. Required sidewalks and trails shall be installed at the time a street is constructed. Subd. 19. Dead -End Streets, Stub Streets and Cul -de -Sac Streets (permanent and temporary). A. Dead -End Streets. Dead -end streets shall be prohibited, except as stub streets. B. Stub Streets. Stub streets shall be installed to permit future street extensions into adjoining tracts, where appropriate. Barricades shall be installed at the end of stub streets and signage shall be provided indicating a future street connection C. Cul -de -Sac Streets (permanent). Cul -de -sac streets may be installed where necessary due to topography, configuration of land, existing road layouts or other special circumstances. D. Cul -de -Sac Streets (temporary). In those instances where a street is terminated pending future extension in conjunction with future platting and its terminus is located 1,320 feet or more from the nearest intersection in rural areas or 900 feet in urban areas, a temporary cul -de -sac with a pavement width of 90 feet in diameter shall be provided at the closed end. Any portion of a temporary cul -de -sac not located within the street right -of -way shall be placed in a temporary roadway easement extending beyond the curb line of the temporary cul -de -sac in all directions. No building permit shall be issued for any properties containing such temporary easement until after the temporary cul -de -sac is constructed. A financial guarantee will be required for removal and restoration, as required by the Development Contract for the subdivision. Subd. 20. Alleys and Private Drives. Alleys and private drives may be permitted by the City Council. Subd. 21. Design Standards, Streets. A. General. In order to provide for streets of suitable location, width and general improvement to accommodate prospective traffic and afford satisfactory access to police, firefighting, snow removal, sanitation and road maintenance equipment, and to coordinate roads so as to compose a convenient system and avoid undue Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 64 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 hardships to adjoining properties, the following design standards for streets are hereby required. B. Street Surfacing and Improvements. After the subdivider has installed sewer and water, the subdivider shall construct poured - in -place concrete curbs and gutters and shall surface streets to the width prescribed in this Chapter. Types of pavement shall be as prescribed in the City's Engineering Design Standards. Adequate provision shall be made for culverts, drains and bridges. The portion of the right -of -way outside the area surfaced shall be sodded. All road pavement, shoulders, drainage improvements and structures, curbs, turnarounds and sidewalks shall conform to all construction standards and specifications in the City's Engineering Design Standards and shall be incorporated into the construction plans required to be submitted by the subdivider for final plat approval. C. Right -of -Way Width. 1. Minimum right -of -way width for minor arterial and collector streets shall be as follows: Street Type Right-of-Way Width Minor Arterial 100 feet Major Collector 80 feet Minor Collector 60 feet 2. The right -of -way width for local streets shall be determined by the City Engineer and shall be adequate to accommodate pavement width and other improvements required within the right -of -way. 3. In order to ensure safety and accommodate existing and future street intersections, bridge overpasses, railway crossings, interchanges, topography and the like, the City may require dedication of a greater right -of -way width than specified above. 4. A subdivider may be required to install landscaped medians for certain minor arterial and collector roadways platted within the subdivision, in accordance with roadway standards established by the City Engineer and the Design Guidelines located in Appendix A of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 65 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 D. Principal Arterials. Lots abutting principal arterials shall have sufficient lot depth required to accommodate any additional structure setbacks provided by the Zoning Ordinance. E. Pavement Width shall be as identified in the City Engineering Design Standards. F. Cul -de -Sac Street Turnarounds. Residential cul -de -sacs may include a center island within the turn - around for snow storage. Maintenance of such center islands shall become the responsibility of a Homeowners Association for the subdivision. The pavement width between the outside curb of the turn - around and such island shall be a minimum of 28 feet wide. G. Street Grades. The minimum grade for all streets shall be 1/2 percent. Grades within 30 feet of intersections with arterial and collector streets and grades for the turnaround portion of a cul -de- sac street shall not exceed 3 percent. Otherwise, the maximum grades shall be as follows: Street Type Maximum Grade Minor Arterial 4% Collector 6% Local 8% H. Intersections. 1. Streets shall be laid out to intersect at right (90 degree) angles with a 50 -foot minimum tangent from the radius return. The angle of an intersection may be varied in cases where topography or other factors justify a variation, but in no case shall a street intersect with another street at angle of less than 75 degrees. Intersections having more than 4 corners shall be prohibited. 2. Proposed new intersections along one side of an existing street shall, wherever practicable, coincide with any existing intersections on the opposite side of such street. Street jogs shall have a centerline offset of at least 150 feet. 3. Minimum curb radius at the intersection of 2 local streets shall be at least 10 feet. I. Street Alignment. Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 66 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 1. Reverse Curves (horizontal alignment). Collector and Arterial streets shall comply with Minnesota State Aid Standards. 2. Differing Street Gradients (vertical alignment). Differing connecting street gradients for minor arterial and collector streets shall be connected with vertical parabolic curves. The minimum length of such curves shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation Road Design Manual, latest revision. Subd. 22. Street Dedication and Reservations. A. All streets within a subdivision shall be dedicated as public streets on the plat, except as may be allowed by Subd. 20 of this Section. B. Streets in new subdivisions shall be laid out so as to eliminate or avoid new perimeter half - streets. Where an existing half - street is adjacent to a new subdivision, the other half of the street shall be improved and dedicated by the subdivider. The City Council may authorize a new perimeter street where the subdivider improves and dedicates the entire required street right -of -way width within the subdivision boundaries. C. Where a subdivision borders an existing substandard street or street needing improvement, the subdivider shall be required to improve and dedicate at its expense those areas for widening or improvement. Such streets shall be improved and dedicated as required by this Subdivision Ordinance. The cost of the improvements shall be apportioned among benefiting properties as determined by the City. 945.030 - Sidewalks and Trails. Subd. 1. Required Improvements. A. A sidewalk or trail shall be installed along all arterial and collector roadways consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Park and Trail Plan. Sidewalks shall extend to the turn - around portion of a cul -de -sac street. Construction of both sidewalks and trails shall be as specified in the City's Engineering Design Standards. B. Width. Sidewalks along local streets shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide. Trails shall be a minimum of 8 feet wide, unless located Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 67 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 directly behind a curb, in which case they shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide. C. Grade. Sidewalks and trails shall be sloped in such a manner so as to prevent pooling of storm water runoff and to drain away from any nearby buildings. The profile grade shall not exceed the grade of the adjacent roadway, unless authorized by the City Engineer. 945.040 - Drainage and Water Quality. Subd.1. General Requirements. A. The City Council will not approve any subdivision that does not make adequate provision for quantity and quality of storm water runoff. Any storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of the sanitary sewer system. B. Water quality basins shall be designed in accordance with the City's Engineering Design Standards. Subd. 2. Dedication of Drainage Easements. A. General Requirements. Where a watercourse, drainage way, channel or stream traverses a subdivision, the subdivider shall provide a storm water easement, drainage right -of -way or park dedication, whichever the City may deem more appropriate. This easement, right -of -way or dedication shall conform substantially with the lines of such water courses, together with such further width or construction, or both, as will be adequate for the storm water drainage of the area. The City Engineer shall determine the width of such easements, etc. B. Drainage Easements. 1. Where topography or other conditions are such as to make impractical the inclusion of drainage facilities within road rights -of -way, the subdivider shall provide perpetual, unobstructed easements at least 20 feet in width for drainage facilities across property outside the road lines and with satisfactory access to the road. Easements shall be indicated on the plat. Drainage easements shall extend from the road to a natural watercourse or to other drainage facilities. Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 68 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 2. When a proposed drainage system will carry water across private land outside the subdivision, appropriate drainage rights must be secured and indicated on the plat. 3. The subdivider shall dedicate by a drainage easement, land on each side of the centerline of any wetland, body of water, watercourse or drainage channel, whether or not shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan, to a sufficient width to 1) provide proper protection for water quality, 2) provide retention of storm water runoff and 3) provide for the installation and maintenance of storm sewers. 945.050 - Sewer and Water Facilities. Subd.1. General Requirements. A. The subdivider shall install adequate sewer and water facilities subject to the specifications in the City's Engineering Design Standards. B. Within the municipal urban service boundary, the subdivider shall install sewer and water mains and service connections, which are stubbed to the property line, to serve all lots in the subdivision. The City Council, in its discretion, may waive this requirement upon a showing that to require the installation of sewer and /or water mains within the subdivision would not be feasible with regard to the extension of existing trunk mains to service the subdivision or that particular locations or unusual circumstances of the proposed plat would cause undue hardship to either the owner or subdivider or the City. C. Within the municipal urban service boundary, the subdivider shall extend sewer and water lines to the lot lines of abutting sites within the urban service area that do not have public water M M11 140M D. In the rural areas, well and septic systems shall be installed in accordance with City and State requirements. 945.060 - Other Utilities. Subd. 1. Location. All utility facilities, including but not limited to telephone, CATV, natural gas and electric power, shall be located underground. Whenever existing utility facilities are located above ground, except Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 69 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 when existing on public roads and right -of -way, they shall be removed and placed underground. Underground service connections to the street property line of each platted lot shall be installed at the subdivider's expense. At the discretion of the City, the requirement for service connections to each lot may be waived in the case of adjoining lots to be retained in single ownership and intended to be developed for the same primary use. Subd. 2. Easements. Utility easements shall be required within the perimeter of each lot, measured from the lot lines. Such easements shall be at least 10 feet wide. Such easements shall have continuity for alignment from block to block. Such easements shall also be provided at deflection points for pole -line anchors where necessary. Subd. 3. Dedication. Easements shall be dedicated on the plat instrument for the required use. 1W Section 945 (Design Standards) Page 70 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 SECTION 950 - EROSION CONTROL 950.010 - Erosion Control Plan. Prior to commencing any earth disturbing activity in a subdivision, the subdivider shall submit an erosion control plan for approval by the City Engineer. The plan shall be approved if it complies with the City's Zoning Ordinance and Erosion Control Ordinance and the requirements contained herein. 950.020 - Erosion Control Measures. Subd.1. All development must comply with the City Erosion Control Ordinance. The following erosion control measures are required for an erosion control plan: A. The developer must provide the City Engineer with both a temporary and permanent erosion control plan which shall be suited to the topography and soils so as to create the least erosion potential. Acceptable temporary and permanent erosion control plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following elements: 1. A site map with existing and final grades. These grades shall include dividing lines and direction of flow for all pre and post construction storm water runoff drainage areas located within the project limits. The site map must also include impervious surfaces and soil types. 2. Locations of all critical areas, and areas delineated for non - disturbance. 3. Locations of areas where construction will be phased to minimize duration of exposed soil areas. 4. Locations and types of all temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs). Standard plates and /or specification for the BMPs used on the project must be included in the final plans and specifications for the project. S. Locations and type of sediment control treatment for all stockpiles located on the project. 6. Plans and specifications for temporary seeding and mulching any exposed soils during construction. Section 950 (Erosion Control) Page 71 October- 21, 2011 7. Plans and specifications for final vegetation establishment, including where appropriate utilizing a long term vegetation management plan for controlling noxious weeds. 8. All plans shall include maintenance requirements and who will be responsible for such maintenance requirements. B. The land shall be developed in increments of workable size on which adequate controls of erosion and siltation can be provided and maintained during the construction period. Grading operations and other land disturbing operations shall be staged so that the area being developed is not exposed for long periods of time without stabilization. Developments are encouraged to plan and implement appropriate construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction land management practices that minimize erosion. C. Temporary vegetation and /or mulching shall be used to protect the areas exposed during the development. These areas shall be seeded, mulched and stabilized with erosion control netting or blanket acceptable to the City Engineer. D. Soil shall be exposed for the shortest feasible period of time. Unless the areas are discharging to a special water, or 303 (d) listed water, the following restraints for soil exposure shall apply. Type of Slope Time of Exposure without being actively worked Steeper than 7 days 3:1 10:1 to 3:1 14days Flatter than 21 days 10:1 E. Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient topsoil shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. Topsoil shall be restored or provided to a depth of 4- inches or to a depth directed by the City Engineer and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development. F. Natural vegetation shall be protected whenever practical. All areas of natural vegetation that are to be protected shall be identified prior to any construction activity commencing. Section 950 (Erosion Control) Page 72 October- 21, 2011 G. Sediment basins (debris basins, desilting basins, or silt traps) shall be installed and maintained to remove sediment from runoff waters from the land undergoing development. Storm sewer inlets shall be provided with debris guards and microsilt basins to trap sediment and avoid possible damage from blockage. The silt shall be removed when necessary. If sediment /siltation measures taken are not adequate and result in downstream sediment, the subdivider shall be responsible for cleaning out or dredging downstream storm sewers and ponds as necessary. During construction activity, all curb and gutter openings, manholes, and catch basins shall be temporarily protected with some type of inlet protection as approved by the City Engineer. H. Before grading is commenced, all control measures as shown on the approved plan shall be installed. Also, any areas not to be disturbed must be delineated (e.g. with flags, stakes, signs, silt fences, et-cetc.) on the development site before the work begins. I. Before grading is commenced, a schedule such as the below listed example shall be provided to the City Engineer. Activity Date Install perimeter protection devices Install vegetation and non - disturbance protection Install erosion control practices Start Clearing and Grubbing Start grading Installation of Temporary Stabilization Practices Installation of Permanent Stabilization Practices J. Erosion control practices shall comply with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Best Management Practices and all applicable NPDES Phase II construction site permit requirements. K. The subdivider shall be responsible for cleaning all streets in the subdivision and adjacent to the subdivision from silt and dirt from the subdivision. Vehicle tracking of sediment form the construction site must be minimized by appropriate BMPs, and street sweeping must be used if the BMPs are not adequate to prevent sediment from being tracked onto the street. Section 950 (Erosion Control) Page 73 October- 21, 2011 L. Maintenance standards and requirements shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Inspection for effectiveness of all erosion and sediment control BMPs will occur on a schedule determined by the City Engineer. This inspection could occur as frequent as weekly or after each 1/4" rain event, if determined to be appropriate by the City Engineer. 2. Accumulated sediment will be removed from all sediment control devices after they reach one -third their capacity. 3. All sediment that moves off site due to construction activities shall be removed at the end of each workday. 4. All sediment that moves off site due to storm events will be cleaned up as soon as possible, but at least by the end of the next day. 5. Temporary gravel access drives will be maintained throughout construction in working condition. 6. All erosion control practices will be maintained until the disturbed areas they protect are permanently stabilized and established. Upon permanent stabilization establishment, the temporary practices shall be removed. Subd. 2. Financial Guarantee: A. A financial guarantee in the form of a performance bond, non - interest bearing cash escrow or letter of credit satisfactory to the City in an amount determined adequate by the City to guarantee compliance with erosion control measures shall be furnished before work is commenced. The financial guarantee shall remain in place until all the subdivider's obligations under the erosion control plan have been satisfied. B. If the City draws upon the financial guarantee, the subdivider shall within 10 days of the draw, deposit with the City additional security of the same type and amount that the City has drawn. No further inspections will be conducted, no new building permits will be issued, and all work shall stop within the development until the cash deposit for erosion control is restored to the pre -draw balance. Section 950 (Erosion Control) Page 74 October- 21, 2011 Subd. 3. Street Cleaning. Prior to commencement of grading, the subdivider shall enter into a contract with an unrelated third party to scrape and sweep the streets in the subdivision and on abutting streets from soil and silt deposited on the streets. At a minimum, scraping and sweeping shall take place on a weekly basis. The City shall be furnished a copy of the contract. The contract shall provide that the contract cannot be canceled without at least 30 days advance written notice to the City. The contract shall further provide that the City may order cleaning of the streets and that the subdivider shall pay the cost. If the subdivider fails to do so, the City may draw on the subdivider's financial guarantee with the City and use it to provide payment for the cleaning. Subd.4. Enforcement. A. The City may issue a stop work order halting all development work and building construction for noncompliance with the erosion control plan. B. The City will conduct site inspections for compliance with appropriate erosion control measures, and any related issues regarding non - compliance will be addressed as appropriate. C. The City may draw down the posted financial guarantee and perform any work necessary to achieve compliance with the erosion control plan. The City will endeavor to give the subdivider advance notice of such action. The issuing authority may act against the appropriate security if there exists any of the conditions below. The issuing authority shall use funds from the appropriate security to finance remedial work undertaken by the City or a private contractor under contract to the City, and to reimburse the City for all direct costs incurred in the process of remedial work including, but no limited to, staff time, attorneys, and inspection fees. Reasons for drawing down the posted financial guarantee may be, but are not limited to, the following: 1. The permittee ceases land disturbing activities and /or filling and abandons the work site prior to the completion of the grading plan. 2. The permittee fails to conform to the temporary or permanent erosion control plan as approved or as modified and has his /her permit revoked. 3. The techniques utilized under the temporary or permanent erosion control plan fail within one year of installation, or Section 950 (Erosion Control) Page 75 October- 21, 2011 before a final plan is implemented for the site or portions of the site, whichever is later. 4. The issuing authority determines that action by the City is necessary to prevent excessive erosion from occurring on the site. t t t t r-, Section 950 (Erosion Control) Page 76 October- 21, 2011 SECTION 955 - PARK DEDICATION 955.010 - Statutory Authorization, Findings of Fact and Statement of Purpose Subd. 1. Statutory Authorization. Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358.Subd.2b provides that municipal subdivision regulations may require that a reasonable portion of any proposed subdivision be dedicated to the public or preserved for conservation purposes or for public use as parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space, and that the municipality may alternatively accept an equivalent amount in cash based upon the undeveloped land value. Subd. 2. Findings of Fact. The City Council finds that: A. The preservation and development of parks, playgrounds, trails and open space areas within the City are essential to maintaining a healthy and desirable environment for residents and persons employed within the City. The presence of parks, trails and open space amenities also enhances the value and attractiveness of residential and commercial /industrial developments to landowners, developers, purchasers, employers, and employees. The City must not only provide for its present citizens, but it must also provide for the future. B. New developments place a burden upon the City's parks and open space system. New facilities must be developed concurrently with development in order to provide the desired level of service and the quality of the environment for all. Therefore, new developments shall be required to contribute toward the City's park system in rough proportion to the relative burden they will place upon the park system. C. The City Council recognizes that the need for such parks, trails, and public open spaces is directly related to the density and intensity of population and development permitted and allowed in the City. Urban development results in increased population, increased intensity of use and greater demands for such public areas and facilities. D. Residential development of land will create approximately ninety - five (95) percent of the need for park and recreational land and facilities within the City. E. Commercial /industrial development of land will create approximately five (5) percent of the need for park and recreational land and facilities within the City. Section 955 (Park Dedication) Page 77 October- 21, 2011 F. Development of land for schools, religious institutions or other non - profit organizations may create additional demand on the City's park and recreational land and facilities. The City may create partnerships with these organizations that foster cooperative use of school, non - profit and park properties for recreational activities. 955.020 - Required Dedication Subd. 1. Dedication of Land or Cash A. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358, Subd. 2b, the City requires all subdividers as a prerequisite to approval of a final subdivision plat, land division or development of any land previously divided by plat, metes or bounds or any other means, which has not provided park dedication, to convey to the city or dedicate to the public use for park, playground, open space, or trail a reasonable portion of the land being platted, divided, or developed as hereinafter specified. The portions to be dedicated will be approved by the City; or in lieu thereof the subdivider shall at the option of the city pay to the city, for use in the acquisition or development of public parks, playgrounds, or in debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes, an equivalent amount in cash based upon the undeveloped land value. Park Dedication is only due in cases where additional new parcels are created. Park dedication would not be due in situations where a replat or lot line adjustment is required to modify lot boundaries without creating any additional lots. B. The form of contribution (cash, land, or any combination thereof) shall be decided by the City Council based upon need and conformance with the comprehensive plan. Subd. 2. Administrative Procedures. The City Council shall establish such administrative procedures as they may deem necessary and required to implement the provisions of this chapter. Subd. 3. Parks and Trails Commission Recommendation. A. The Parks and Trails Commission shall, in each case, recommend to the City Council the total area and location of such land that the Parks and Trails Commission feels should be so conveyed or dedicated within the development for the above public purposes. Section 955 (Park Dedication) Page 78 October- 21, 2011 These recommendations shall be based on the recommendations included in the City parks and trails plan. B. The Parks and Trails Commission shall, prior to the time that the Planning Commission completes its public hearings on the preliminary plat, review the preliminary plat and recommend to the Planning Commission the total area and location of the land the Park and Trails Commission determines should be dedicated for park use. The Parks and Trails Commission shall present these recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. In those instances where the Parks and Trails Commission concludes that a cash equivalency payment should be made by the applicant or owner in lieu of dedication of land, the Parks and Recreation Commission shall recommend to the Planning Commission the percentage of the total park dedication requirement to be paid to the City in cash. In the event that review at a regular meeting of the Parks and Trails Commission would result in a delay in the review and approval process so that the time limitations of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358 may not be met, the requirement of review by the Parks and Trails Commission may be waived by either the applicant or by the City Council at the time of its review of the application. Subd. 4. Standards for Determination. A. The Parks and Trails Commission shall develop and recommend to the City Council for adoption standards and guidelines for determining which portion of each such development should reasonably be required to be conveyed or dedicated. Such standards and guidelines may take into consideration the zoning classification to be assigned to the land to be developed, the particular use proposed for such land, amenities to be provided, and factors of density and site development as proposed by the subdivider. The Parks and Trails Commission shall further recommend changes and amendments from time to time to such standards and guidelines to reflect changes in the usage of land which may occur, changes in zoning classification and concepts and changes in planning and development concepts that relate to the development and usages to which land may be put. B. The Parks and Trails Commission shall develop and recommend standards for design and construction of public parks, trails, and open space areas in the city. These standards shall be included in the parks and trails plan. Section 955 (Park Dedication) Page 79 October- 21, 2011 Subd. 5. Dedicated Land Requirements. Any land to be dedicated as a requirement of this chapter shall be reasonably adapted for the above public purposes. Factors used in evaluating the adequacy of proposed dedication areas shall include size, shape, topography, drainage, geology, tree cover, rare species and other significant wildlife habitats, access, and location. Subd. 6. Minimum Area of Dedicated Land. Subdividers shall be required to dedicate to the city for park, trail, playground, open space and other public purposes as a minimum that percentage of net land area or equivalent market value in cash as set out below: Residential land uses: Units per Percentage of land or equivalent market value in cash acre Up to 6 10 6 or more 12 %, plus 1% for each additional dwelling unit /acre over 6 dwelling units acre* *For purposes of park dedication, density shall be rounded down to nearest whole number. For example a development at 8.5 units per acre would be required to pay 14% park dedication. A. In no event shall the cash in lieu of land payment exceed $6,000 per residential unit. B. The City Council shall review the maximum cash in lieu of land payment at least every 2 years, to ensure that it remains consistent with park and trail system development costs. C. Commercial and industrial land uses: Dedication requirement is five percent (5 %) of land or equivalent market value in cash. In no event shall the cash in lieu of land payment exceed $4,500 per acre of land proposed for development. D. Schools, religious institutions and other non - profit organizations: Dedication requirement shall be determined by the City Council based on discussion with the School District or non - profit agency. Recommendations will be based on anticipated use of City park facilities by the school or organization, and shall consider agreements for cooperative use of school recreational facilities. E. Determination of Fair Market Value. To determine the fair market value of the undeveloped land, the Developer shall submit an appraisal at the time of preliminary plat application. Section 955 (Park Dedication) Page 80 October- 21, 2011 The city will then obtain a review appraisal as a validation of the Developer's appraisal. If staff and the Developer are unable to agree on fair market value, the City Council will make the determination of fair market value. F. Lands Designated On Official Map or Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Where a proposed park, playground, trail or open space area indicated in the city park and trail plan or comprehensive plan is located in whole or in part within a proposed subdivision, all or part of the proposed public site shall be designated as such and should be dedicated to the city, based on the area of land dedication required by this ordinance. G. Deviation from Required Dedication. The dedication requirements based on the development's proportional share of the City park system are presumptively appropriate. H. Wetlands and Ponding Areas. Existing wetlands drainage ways accepted by the city shall not be considered in the parkland and /or cash contribution to the city. Subd. 7. Land Dedication /Payment of Fees A. Land Dedication. When land is to be dedicated to satisfy the park dedication requirement, separate lots or outlots shall be indicated on the plat drawings for the area(s) to be dedicated. Permanent trail easements may be allowed for dedication of trail corridors shown on the Parks and Trails Plan. Such lots, outlots or easements shall be deeded to the City prior to the issuance of any building permits within the plat. The developer shall be responsible for finished grading, ground cover and construction of trails in all lands to be dedicated to the City. No credit toward the required dedication shall be given for this work, except that credit for the land area within trail easements for trails included in the City's adopted trail plan will be given. B. Cash fee. When a cash fee is to be paid in lieu of land dedication, the payment of such fee shall be required as follows: 1. For residential developments, the fee shall be paid prior to the City's release of the signed final plat mylars for recording with Hennepin County. 2. For commercial and industrial developments the fee shall be paid prior to issuance of any building permits within the subdivision. Section 955 (Park Dedication) Page 81 October- 21, 2011 3. Park dedication is required for all newly created lots or parcels. 4. In plats that include outlots for future development, the subdivider may pay to the City 1) the development's proportional share for the entire subdivision, including the outlots, or 2) the development's proportional share excluding such outlots, providing that the park dedication requirement shall be satisfied when such outlots are replatted. Subd. 8. Credit for Private Parks A. Standards for Credit. At the City Council's discretion, Park dedication credit may be given where private parks and facilities are provided in a proposed subdivision, and such space is to be privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the subdivision. Credit maybe considered when the City Council finds it is in the public interest to do so, and that the following standards are met: 1. Such credit maybe given only for park areas within the proposed subdivision that are designed on the Parks and Trails Map as Neighborhood Parks. 2. The facilities proposed for the private parks and facilities shall be in substantial accordance with the provisions of the Parks and Trails Plan, and approved by the City Council. 3. In no circumstances shall such credit for private facilities exceed 20 percent of the amount required to be dedicated to the public under this chapter. The council and Parks Commission will consider the proportion of neighborhood park needs provided by the proposed facility, and the proportion of new neighborhood residents to be served by the facility in determining the credit to be given for private park facilities. 4. Yards, court areas, setbacks and other open space required to be maintained by the zoning ordinance shall not be included in the computation of such private open space. S. The private ownership and maintenance of the parks is adequately provided for by written agreement. 6. The private parks are restricted for park and recreation purposes by recorded covenants that run with the land in favor of Section 955 (Park Dedication) Page 82 October- 21, 2011 the future owners of property within the subdivision and which cannot be modified without the written consent of the City Council. 7. The proposed private parks are reasonably adaptable for use for park or recreation purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, drainage, access, and location of the proposed facilities. Subd. 9. Park Fund. A. Purpose of Park Fund. Cash payments shall be placed by the City in a special park fund and used only for the acquisition and development of land for parks, trails, playgrounds, public open space; development of existing park and playground sites, public open space; and debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for park purposes. B. Annual Financial Report. Each year, the Parks and Trails Commission shall present to the council, in such detail as the council shall require, its estimate of the financial needs of the Parks and Trails Commission for the ensuing fiscal year. B C. Gifts and Donations. The Parks and Trails Commission is authorized to receive gifts, devises, bequests, endowments, or other donations of money and property on behalf of the City. All moneys received shall be deposited in the Park Fund. (Ord. 196, passed 06- 24 -04, Ord. 223, passed 08- 11 -05) Section 955 (Park Dedication) Page 83 October- 21, 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Section 955 (Park Dedication) Page 84 October- 21, 2011 SECTION 960 - DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT 960.010 - Purpose. It is the purpose of this section to ensure that a subdivider follows the conditions of approval and properly installs the basic improvements required in a plat. To that end, whenever a subdivision includes any public improvements or other conditions of approval, the subdivider shall enter into a development contract with the City, setting forth the conditions under which the subdivision is approved. 960.020 - Required Basic Improvements. Subd. 1. Subdivider Installation of Improvements. The subdivider shall arrange for installation of all required improvements in the development subject to the development contract and the requirements defined in the City of Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. Subd. 2. City Installation of Improvements. The City reserves the right to elect to install all or any part of the basic improvements required under the provisions of this section pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, as may be amended. Subd. 3. Basic Improvements Required. All of the following required improvements to be installed under the provisions of this section shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the design standards of this Chapter and the City of Corcoran Engineering Design Standards, which are adopted herein by reference; and approved by and subject to the inspection of the City Engineer. All of the City's expenses incurred as the result of the required improvements shall be paid to the City by the subdivider. A. Streets. B. Sanitary sewer. C. Watermain. D. Surface water facilities (pipe, ponds, rain gardens, etc.). E. Grading and erosion control. F. Sidewalks /trails. G. Street lighting. Section 960 (Development Contract) Page 85 October- 21, 2011 H. Street signs and traffic control signs. I. Landscaping required by Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance. J. Wetland mitigation and buffers. K. Monuments required by Minnesota Statutes. L. Miscellaneous facilities. 960.030 - Other Improvements Required. The subdivider shall arrange for the installation of telephone, CATV, electrical and natural gas service following the grading of boulevard or utility easements. 960.040 - Completion O€of Basic Improvements. Subd. 1. The subdivider shall complete all required basic improvements no later than one year following the commencement of work on the improvements, except 1) where weather precludes completion, 2) for street lighting, 3) for landscaping and 4) for the wearing course of streets. A. Where weather precludes completion, the improvement(s) may be completed at the outset of the next construction /growing season. B. The subdivider shall complete street lighting within 2 years following the initial commencement of work on the required basic improvements. C. The subdivider shall complete landscaping within one year following the issuance of a building permit for the last vacant lot within the subdivision unless weather precludes completion, in which case the landscaping shall be completed at the outset of the next growing season. Subd. 2. Reproducible record plans of all public improvements as required by the City Engineer shall be furnished to the City by the subdivider. Such record plans shall be in mylar format and, unless previously exempted from the electronic format requirements, an electronic format approved by the City Engineer and shall be certified to be true and accurate by the registered engineer responsible for the installation of the improvements. Section 960 (Development Contract) Page 86 October- 21, 2011 960.050 - Financial Guarantees. Subsequent to execution of the development contract but prior to the release of a signed final plat mylar for recording, the subdivider shall provide the City with a financial guarantee in the form of a performance bond, letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or a combination of a performance bond, letter of credit and a cash deposit with the City. The guarantee shall be in an amount equal to 125 percent of the estimated cost of completion of the specified basic improvements. The issuer of the letter of credit or the escrow agent, as applicable, shall be acceptable to the City. Subd. 1. Letter of Credit. If the subdivider posts a letter of credit as a guarantee, the credit shall 1) be irrevocable, 2) be from a bank approved by the City, 3) be in a form approved by the City, 4) be for a term sufficient to cover the completion, maintenance and warranty periods identified in this Section and 5) require only that the City present the credit with a sight draft and an affidavit signed by the City Administrator or the Administrator's designee attesting to the City's right to draw funds under the credit. Subd. 2. Cash Escrow. If the subdivider posts a cash escrow as a guarantee, the escrow instructions approved by the City shall provide that 1) the subdivider will have no right to a return of any of the funds except as provided in Section 960.060, and 2) the escrow agent shall have a legal duty to deliver the funds to the City whenever the City Administrator or the Administrator's designee presents an affidavit to the agent attesting to the City's right to receive funds whether or not the subdivider protests that right. Subd. 3. Cash. A cash deposit made with the City may be used as part of the required financial guarantee in those instances where the subdivider elects to have the City install some or all of the public improvements. Subd. 4. Performance Bond. A performance bond shall be conditioned upon the performance by the operator to complete the work for which the bond is required. The performance guarantee shall be issued by an insurance company, bank or other entity approved by the City and shall be conditioned upon the faithful performance of all terms of the permit and the law, and shall specify that if the City determines that the subdivider has failed to faithfully perform or is in default under any of its obligations, the obligor shall make good and reimburse the City such funds as are necessary to pay damages incurred by the City or otherwise meet the obligations of the permit and the law. Section 960 (Development Contract) Page 87 October- 7November 21, 2011 960.060 - Release and Expiration of Financial Guarantees. Subd. 1. The financial guarantee shall be held by the City until, upon written notice by the subdivider and certification from a professional engineer that part or all of the required improvements have been completed and upon verification of such by the City staff, a portion or the entire financial guarantee is released by the City Engineer. No financial guarantee shall be released in full until the City has received 1) certified, reproducible record plans of all required improvements installed by the subdivider and 2) a title insurance policy approved by the City Attorney indicating that the improvements are free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances. Subd. 2. It shall be the responsibility of the subdivider to insure that a submitted financial guarantee shall continue in full force and effect until the City Engineer has approved and accepted all of the required improvements, and thereby is authorized to release the guarantee or reduce the amount of the guarantee as provided in Subd. 1 above. Subd. 3. When any instrument submitted as a financial guarantee contains provision for an expiration date, after which the instrument may not be drawn upon, not withstandin notwithstanding the status of the Development Contract or of the required improvements, the expiration date shall be October 31 or the closest business day in the case of weekends and legal holidays. Further, the financial guarantee shall be deemed automatically extended without change for 6 months from the expiration date unless 60 days prior to the expiration date, the financial institution notifies the City in writing by certified mail that it does not elect to renew the financial guarantee for an additional period. If the instrument is not to be renewed and has not been released by the City Engineer, another acceptable financial guarantee in the appropriate amount shall be submitted at least 60 days prior to the expiration. The term of any extension shall be approved by the City Engineer and subject to the requirements of this section. Upon receipt of an acceptable substitute financial guarantee, the City Engineer may release the original guarantee. 960.070 - Performance Guarantee. Subd. 1. The subdivider shall submit either 1) a performance bond or 2) a letter of credit for 25 percent of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. Section 960 (Development Contract) Page 88 October- 21, 2011 A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship from the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be 2 years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to one year from the date of final written acceptance, unless the wearing course is placed during the same construction season as the bituminous base course. In those instances, the subdivider shall guarantee all work, including street construction, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, material and equipment for a period of 2 years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one growing season following installation. 1W Section 960 (Development Contract) Page 89 October- 21, 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Section 960 (Development Contract) Page 90 October- 21, 2011 SECTION 965 - OFFICIAL MAPS 965.010 - Purpose. Land that is needed for future street purposes and as sites for other necessary public facilities and services is frequently diverted to non - public uses which could have been located on other lands without hardship or inconvenience to the owners. When this happens, public uses of land may be denied or may be obtained only at prohibitive cost or at the expense of dislocating the owners and occupants of the land. Identification on an official map of land needed for future public uses permits both the public and private property owners to adjust their building plans equitably and conveniently before investments are made which will make such adjustments difficult to accomplish. It is the purpose of this ordinance to provide a uniform procedure for the proper use of official maps as authorized by the Minnesota Municipal Planning Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.351 to 462.36. 965.020 - Official Map Defined. "Official map" as used in this ordinance means a map adopted in accordance with this ordinance showing existing streets, proposed future streets, and the area needed for widening of existing streets of the City. An official map may also show the location of existing and future land and facilities within the City. An official map may cover the entire City or any portion of the City. 965.030 - Initiation of Proceedings. Proceedings for adoption, amendment, or repeal of an official map or any part thereof may be initiated by 1) the City's Planning Division; 2) a recommendation of the Planning Commission; or 3) action by the City Council. 965.040 - Reference to Planning Commission. Every proposed official map or change in a map shall be referred to the Planning Commission for advice and recommendation thereon, and such recommendation shall be submitted to the City Council within 45 days after reference to the Planning Commission along with the report of the Commission on the effect of the proposal on the comprehensive plan of the City. If no recommendation is received by the Council from the Planning Commission within 45 days after reference of the proposal to the Commission by the Council, the Council may take such action as it may deem proper upon the proposal without further action by the Planning Commission. Section 965 (Official Maps) Page 91 October- 21, 2011 965.050 - Notice Andand Hearing. Subd.1. Notice. Upon receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commission or after 45 days from the submission of the proposal to the Planning Commission without a recommendation from the Commission, the Council may call a public hearing on the proposal. A notice of the time, place, and purpose of the hearing and a description of property to be included in the mapped streets and public grounds shall be published in the official newspaper at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing. At least 10 days prior to the hearing the Clerk shall also mail a copy of the notice to each owner of land situated within or abutting any street or other public ground shown on the official map. For purposes of this notice the owners shall be determined by the records of the County Auditor and the notice shall be addressed to the last known address as shown by the Auditor's records. Failure to serve any such notice shall not invalidate the proceedings. Subd. 2. Hearing. At the time and place specified in the notice, the Council shall hear evidence and arguments concerning the proposal. The hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice. The Council may direct the Planning Commission to conduct a hearing and following the hearing to report its recommendation to the Council. Nor''Nq 965.060 - Preparation and Filing of Maps. The official map or maps shall be prepared in sufficient detail to permit the establishment of future acquisition lines on the ground. In unplatted areas a minimum of a centerline survey shall be made prior to the preparation of the final draft of the official map. A licensed land surveyor shall attest to the accuracy of the future acquisition lines shown on the official map. After enactment of any ordinance adopting an official map or amending or repealing a previous official map ordinance, a certified copy of the official map or section to which the ordinance relates together with an attached copy of the ordinance shall be filed with the County Recorder. 965.070 - Effect. After an official map has been adopted and filed, the issuance of building permits by the City shall be subject to the provisions of this ordinance. The City shall deny every application for a permit to construct a new building or structure or expand an existing building or structure within any area designated on the official map for street or other public purposes. Whenever any street or highway is widened or improved or any new street is opened, or any interest in lands for other public Section 965 (Official Maps) Page 92 October- 21, 2011 purposes is acquired by the City, the City is not required in such proceedings to pay for any building or structure placed without a permit or in violation of conditions of a permit within the limits of the mapped street or outside of any building line that may have been established upon the existing street or within any area thus identified for public purposes. The adoption of an official map does not give the City any right, title, or interest in areas identified for public purposes thereon, but the adoption of the map does authorize the City to acquire such interest without paying compensation for buildings or structures erected in such areas without a permit or in violation of the conditions of a permit. 965.080 - Appeals. Whenever a building permit is denied pursuant to this ordinance, the Board of Appeals and Adjustments shall, upon appeal filed with it by the owner of the land, grant a permit for building in an area designated on the official map for a street or other public purpose in any case in which the Board finds, upon the evidence and the arguments presented to it, (a) that the entire property of the appellant of which the area designated for public purposes forms a part cannot yield a reasonable use to the owner unless such a permit is granted, or (b) that balancing the interest of the City in preserving the integrity of the official map and of the comprehensive City plan and the interest of the property owner in the use of his property and in the benefits of ownership, the grant of such permit is required by considerations of justice and equity. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments shall hold a public hearing upon the appeal after notice of the hearing has been published in the official newspaper once at least 10 days before the hearing. If the Board authorizes the issuance of a permit, it shall specify the exact location, ground area, height, and other details as to the extent and character of the building for which the permit is granted. If the Board authorizes issuance of a permit, the Council or other Board or Commission having jurisdiction shall have 6 months from the date of the decision of the Board to institute proceedings to acquire such land or interest therein, and if no such proceedings are started within that time, the City shall issue the permit if the application otherwise conforms to local ordinances. Section 965 (Official Maps) Page 93 October- 21, 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Section 965 (Official Maps) Page 94 October- 21, 2011 SECTION 970 - ADMINISTRATION - VARIANCES 970.010 - Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide for variations from the literal provisions of this Chapter in instances where strict enforcement would cause h-aFdsh4p- practical difficulties because of conditions affecting the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated that such actions would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. 970.020 - Board of Adjustments and Appeals. The City Council shall be designated to act as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. References to the "Council" hereafter in this section shall mean the City Council acting in its capacity as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. 970.030 - Review Criteria. The Council shall not approve a variance unless they find that - failure to grant the variance will result in n haF Iship practical difficulties to the applicant, as defined by Minnesota Statute 462.357. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that and, as may be applicable, all of the following criteria have been met: A. That because of the cieulaF physical SUFFOUndinff, she, o - tepegr-aphieal conditions of the specific- unreel of l-,n,-1 involved, a part-i-eul hip to the owner- would result, as distinguished frem inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were to he e-,rrie,-1 n„tThat there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. . B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landownerare not applicable generally, to other n erty Within the same zoning elassification C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the localitvh° aotri,nental to the public welfare or- rious to ether lnn. -1 e imnrn.,e Gents in the neighbor-hood in which then eel of land is located. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. QE. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Section 970 (Administration - Variances) Page 95 October- 21, 2011 D-.F. Tbof the proposed . -,tion will not impair- an adequate s pl., of light and air to adjacent property, or- substantially increase the , f public c eet�rncFease danger of fire er E9rrg�5- t�-8 -r e- p- crvrrc�t -F , (�r�cT -orzrr -for endanger the public safety, OF ubst-,ntially ,liminish e preperyy values within the neighbnrheorl. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. 970.040 - Procedures. An application for a variance shall be approved or denied pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.35849. Additional City requirements are as follows: Subd.1. Processing. A. Requests for a variance to the provisions of this Chapter shall be filed with the Zoning Administrator on an official application form. Such variance application shall be considered simultaneously with an application for subdivision approval. A fee as set forth by the City Code shall accompany such application. This fee shall not be refunded. The variance application shall be considered officially complete when the applicant has complied with all the specified informational requirements, which shall include the following: 1. A written description of the request for the variance, including an explanation of compliance with the variance criteria set forth in this section; and 2. Supporting materials such as site plans, as determined by the Zoning Administrator, as necessary for the complete and clear definition and understanding of the request. 3. The applicant shall sign the application. If the fee owner of the property is not the applicant, the applicant shall provide written authorization by the fee owner as part of the application. B. Upon receipt of a complete application, as determined by staff review, and following preliminary staff analysis of the application and request, the Zoning Administrator, when appropriate, shall establish a schedule for consideration by the Planning Commission. At least 10 days before the date of the Planning Commission meeting, a written notice of the request shall be mailed to all owners of property located within 350 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of the application. Section 970 (Administration - Variances) Page 96 Oco�TNovember 21, 2011 C. Failure of a property owner to receive notice shall not invalidate any such proceedings as set forth within this Chapter. D. The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports where appropriate, and provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation on the action to the Planning Commission. E. The applicant or a representative thereof may appear before the Planning Commission in order to present and answer questions concerning the proposed request. F. The Planning Commission shall make a finding of fact and make a recommendation on such actions or conditions relating to the request, as they deem necessary to carry out the purpose of this Chapter. Such recommendations shall be in writing and accompanied by the report and recommendation of the City staff. G. The Council shall not act upon the request until they have received a report and recommendation from the Planning Commission and the City staff. H. Upon receiving the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the City staff, the City Administrator shall schedule the application for consideration by the Council. Such reports and recommendations shall be entered in and made part of the permanent written record of the Council meeting. I. Upon receiving the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the City staff, the Council shall have the option to set and hold a public hearing if deemed necessary and shall make a recorded finding of fact and may impose any condition they consider necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. If, upon receiving said reports and recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff, the Council finds that specific inconsistencies exist in the review process and thus the final determination of the Council will differ from that of the Planning Commission, the Council may, before taking final action, refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. The Council shall provide the Planning Commission with a written statement detailing the specific reasons for referral. This procedure shall be followed only one time on a singular action. Section 970 (Administration - Variances) Page 97 Oco�TNovember 21, 2011 K. Approval of a request shall require passage by a majority vote of the entire Council. L. When granting a variance, the Council may impose conditions it deems necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare, and to meet the objectives of the provision to which the variance is granted. M. In all cases where a variance is granted, the Council shall require such evidence and guarantees as it deems necessary to insure compliance with the conditions designated in connection therewith. N. The Zoning Administrator shall serve a copy of the final order of the Council upon the applicant by mail. 0. Whenever an application for a variance has been considered and denied by the Council, a similar application for a variance affecting substantially the same property shall not be considered again by the Planning Commission or Council for at least 6 months from the date of its denial. 970.050 - Appeal of Council Ruling. Any person or persons, any private or public board, or taxpayer of the City aggrieved by any decision of the Council shall have the right to seek review of the decision with a court of record in the manner provided by the laws of the State of Minnesota, and particularly Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, as such statutes may from time to time be amended, supplemented or replaced. 970.060 - Expiration. A variance approved under this section shall expire without further action by the Planning Commission or the Council, at such time as the related subdivision approval expires. Section 970 (Administration - Variances) Page 98 Oe*�November 21, 2011 SECTION 975 - ADMINISTRATION - VACATIONS OF RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND EASEMENTS 975.010 - Procedure. A request for vacation of a right -of -way or easement shall be filed in writing with the City Engineer. In the case of a request for vacation of a right -of -way, a landowner directly abutting such right -of -way shall sign the written request. In the case of a request for vacation of an easement, a landowner of the property encumbered by such easement shall sign the written request. 975.020 - Filing. A written request to vacate a right -of -way or an easement shall be accompanied by the following: A. Information, both written and graphic, that describes the reason for, and location of, the proposed vacation; B. A fee as set forth in the City Code; C. For requests involving the vacation of right -of -way, the applicant shall submit the addresses of all properties directly abutting the right -of -way to be vacated; and D. For requests involving the vacation of an easement, the applicant shall submit a legal description of the area to be vacated. 975.030 - Public Hearing Required. Subd. 1. Upon receipt of a complete vacation request, the City Engineer shall set a public hearing following proper notification. Subd. 2. Notice of said hearing shall be published once in the official newspaper at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and shall be mailed to all landowners of property directly abutting the area to be vacated and to all utility companies serving the area. Subd. 3. The City Engineer shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports where appropriate, and provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation of the action to the City Council. Section 975 (Administration - Vacations of Right -of -Way and Easements) Page 99 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 Subd. 4. The City Council shall consider possible adverse effects of the requested vacation. Its judgment shall be based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: A. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. B. The proposed action meets the purpose and intent of this Chapter. C. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the future needs of the City, utility companies and surrounding property owners. Subd. S. The City Council and City staff shall have the authority to request additional information from the applicant or to retain expert testimony with the consent and at the expense of the applicant, said information to be declared necessary to establish performance conditions in relation to all pertinent sections of this Chapter. Subd. 6. The applicant or a representative thereof may appear before the City Council in order to present information and answer questions concerning the proposed request. Subd. 7. Upon receiving the report and recommendation of the City staff, the City Council shall conduct the hearing, consider the request, and render its decision. The staff recommendation shall be entered in and made part of the permanent written record of the City Council meeting. Subd. 8. Approval of a right -of -way or easement vacation by the City Council shall require passage by a majority vote of the-all its membersee City Council. Subd. 9. Whenever an application for a right -of -way or easement vacation has been considered and denied by the City Council, a similar application for a vacation shall not be considered again by the City Council for at least 6 months from the date of its denial. Section 975 (Administration - Vacations of Right -of -Way and Easements) Page 100 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 SECTION 980 - ADMINISTRATION - APPEALS 980.010 - Board Designation. The City Council shall serve as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. References to the "Council" hereafter in this section shall mean the City Council acting in its capacity as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. 980.020 - Applicability. An appeal shall only be applicable to an interpretation of legislative intent of provisions of this Chapter. Opinions and evaluations as they pertain to the impact or result of a request are not subject to the appeal procedure. 980.030 - Filing. An appeal from the ruling of an administrative officer of the City shall be filed by the property owner or their agent with the Zoning Administrator within 30 days after the making of the order being appealed. 980.040 - Stay of Proceedings. An appeal stays all proceedings and the furtherance of the action being appealed unless it is certified to the Council, after the notice of appeal is filed, that by reason of facts stated in the certificate, a stay would cause imminent peril to life and property. In such case, the proceedings shall not be stayed other than by a restraining order which may be granted by a court of record on application, and upon subsequent notice to the City. 980.050 - Procedure. The procedure for making such an appeal shall be as follows: Subd. 1. The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator a notice of appeal stating the specific grounds upon which the appeal is made. A fee set forth in the City Code shall accompany said application. Subd. 2. The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports when appropriate and shall provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation on the action to the Council. Subd. 3. The Council shall make its decision by resolution within 60 days from the date on which a completed application is filed. Subd. 4. The Zoning Administrator shall serve a copy of the final order of the Council upon the petitioner by mail. Section 980 (Administration - Appeals) Page 101 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 980.060 - Appeals from the City Council. Any person or persons, any private or public board, or taxpayer of the City aggrieved by any decision of the Council shall have the right to seek review of the decision with a court of record in the manner provided by the laws of the State of Minnesota, and particularly Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, as such statutes may be from time to time amended, supplemented or replaced. Section 980 (Administration - Appeals) Page 102 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 SECTION 985 - ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES 985.010 - Administration. This Chapter shall be administered and enforced by the Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator's duties shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Subd. 1. Periodically inspect property to determine compliance with the terms of this Chapter. Subd. 2. Notify, in writing, any person responsible for violating a provision of this Chapter, indicating the nature of the violation and ordering the action necessary to correct it. Subd. 3. Order discontinuance of illegal work being done or take any other action authorized by this Chapter to insure compliance with or to prevent violation of its provisions, including cooperation with the City Attorney in the prosecution of complaints. Subd. 4. Maintain permanent and current records of the Subdivision Ordinance. Subd. 5. Maintain current files of all subdivision approvals and copies of notices of violations thereto and, upon request, provide complaint and violation information to any person having a proprietary or tenancy interest in any specific property. Subd. 6. Provide clerical and technical assistance to the Planning Commission, City Council, and Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals. Subd. 7. Receive, file and forward as applicable to the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals, Planning Commission, or City Council all applications for subdivision as required herein. 985.020 - Enforcement. If any subdivision, construction, reconstruction, or use occurs in violation of this Chapter, the Zoning Administrator may, in addition to other remedies, institute any proper criminal action or proceedings in the name of the City of Corcoran, and hereby shall have the powers of a police officer to prevent such unlawful subdivision, construction, reconstruction, or use, to restrain or correct such violations, to prevent the occupancy of said property, or to prevent any illegal act, conduct, business or use in or about said premises. Section 985 (Enforcement and Penalties) Page 103 Oc*o�TNovember 21, 2011 985.030 - Penalties. Any person who violates a provision of this Chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined or penalized not more than the maximum levels established by the State of Minnesota for misdemeanor offenses. t t t t Section 985 (Enforcement and Penalties) Page 104 October- ?November 21, 2011 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -48 Motion By: Seconded By: November 21, 2011 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran initiated an amendment to update the Subdivision Ordinance to be consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with and implement the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Subdivision Ordinance text amendment, based upon the finding that the proposed amendments would be consistent with State law and the City's Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with other provisions of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 21St day of November 2011. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 1 of 1 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2011 -263 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2011 -262 November 21, 2011 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE, ENTITLED CORCORAN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Chapter 9 of the Corcoran City Code is the Corcoran Subdivision Ordinance. This Ordinance amends the text of the following sections: Section 915 — Rules and Definitions Section 930 — Preliminary Plat Procedure Section 935 — Final Plat Procedure Section 940 — Open Space Preservation Plats Section 970 — Administration — Variances Section 975 — Administration - Vacations of Rights -Of -Way and Easements A printed copy of the entire amended Subdivision Ordinance is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk's regular office hours. VOTING AYE ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn VOTING NAY ❑ Guenthner, Ken ❑ Asleson, Rich ❑ Cossette, Tom ❑ Gmach, George ❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this 21St day of November 2011. ATTEST: Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor Page 1 of 1 City Seal EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 3, 2010 Chapter Two 0 Zoning Regulations (G) Species. The following is a list of recommended plant materials: Common Name Scientific Name Type Native Conifers Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Conifer No Eastern Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Conifer Yes Tamarack Larix laricina Conifer Yes White Spruce Picea glauca Conifer Yes Norway Spruce Picea abies Conifer No Jack Pine Pinus banksiana Conifer Yes Norway Pine Pinus resinosa Conifer Yes White Pine Pinus strobus Conifer Yes American Arborvitae; White Thuja occidentalis Conifer Yes Cedar Carya cordiformis Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Canadian Hemlock Tsuga Canadensis Conifer Yes Deciduous Trees Red Maple Acer rubrum Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Silver Maple and Cultivars Acer saccharinum Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Ohio Buckeye Aeschylus glabra Primary Deciduous; Overstory No Yellow Birch Betula alleghaniensis Primary Deciduous; Overstory No River Birch Betula nigra Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Paper Birch Betula papyrifer Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes American Hornbeam; Blue Carpinus caroliniana Primary Deciduous; Understory Yes Beech Bitternut Hickory Carya cordiformis Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Shagbark Hickory Carya ovate Primary Deciduous; Overstory No Northern Catalpa Catalpa speciosa Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Hawthorn Crataegus crus -galli Primary Deciduous; Ornamental Yes Honeylocust Gleditsia triacanthos Primary Deciduous; Overstory No Kentucky Coffee Tree Gymnocladus dioica Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Black Walnut Juglans nigra Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Crabapple Malus sp. Primary Deciduous; Ornamental No Ironwood Ostrya virginiana Primary Deciduous; Understory Yes Cottonwood (male, non- Populus deltoides Secondary Deciduous; Overstory Yes seeding) Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Secondary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Canada Plum Prunus nigra Primary Deciduous; Ornamental No Black Cherry Prunus serotina Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes White Oak Quercus alba Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Northern Pin Oak Quercus ellipsoidalis Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Pin Oak Quercus palustris Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Red Oak Quercus rubra Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Black Oak Quercus velutina Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes American Mountain Ash Sorbus Americana Primary Deciduous; Ornamental Yes European Mountain Ash Sorbus aucuparia Primary Deciduous; Ornamental No Basswood; American Tilia Americana Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Linden Littleleaf Linden Tilia cordata Primary Deciduous; Overstory No City of Scandia Development Code, Chapter 2 Page 2 -62 EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 3, 2010 Common Name American Elm (Dutch Elm- resistant varieties Slippery Elm; Red Elm Deciduous Shrubs Downy Serviceberry Shadbow Serviceberry Allegany Serviceberry Leadplant Red Chokeberry Black Chokeberry Pagoda Dogwood Gray Dogwood Redosier Dogwood American Hazel Bush Honeysuckle Wahoo Common Witchhazel Wild Plum Pin Cherry Fragrant Sumac Smooth Sumac Staghom Sumac Willows (native to Minnesota) Arrowwood Viburnum Nannyberry American Highbush Cranberry Scientific Name Ulmus Americana Ulmus rubra Amelanchior arborea Amelanchior canadensis Amelanchior laevis Amopha canescens Aronia arbutifolia Aronia melanocarpa Corpus altemifolia Cornus racemosa Cornus stolonifera Corylus Americana Diervilla lonicera Euonymous atropurpureus Hamamelis virginiana Prunus Americana Prunus pensylvanica Rhus aromatic Rhus glabra Rhus typhina Salix, sp. Viburnum dentatum Viburnum lentango Viburnum trilobum Chapter Two 0 Zoning Regulations Type Native Primary Deciduous; Overstory Yes Primary Deciduous; Overstory Tall Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Low Shrub; Understory Low Shrub; Understory Low Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Low Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Low Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Low Shrub; Understory Low Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Tall Shrub; Understory Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No The complement of trees fulfilling the requirements of this Section shall be not less than 25% deciduous and not less than 25% coniferous, unless the proposed plantings are designed to create a natural setting and it is approved by the City Council. Single - family development is exempt from this requirement. No required tree shall be an invasive species identified by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or any of the following: • A species of the genus Ulmus (elm), except those elms bred to be immune to Dutch Elm disease; • Female Cottonwood; • A species of the genus Fraxinus (ash); or • Female ginko. (H) Parking Lots/Planting Islands. All automobile parking lots designed for 15 or more parking spaces shall provide landscaping areas dispersed throughout the parking lot, in order to avoid the undesirable monotony, heat and wind associated with large parking areas. Parking lots with less than 15 spaces shall not be required to provide City of Scandia Development Code, Chapter 2 Page 2 -63 STAFF REPORT / POLICE DEPARTMENT Agenda Item 11 e Council Meeting: Prepared By: November 21, 2011 Chief Sean Gormley Topic: Action Required: Range Agreement Approve Range Agreement Background- At the October 27, 2011 City Council meeting, a draft agreement was provided for review and comments. Discussion- City Attorney Jeff Carson has updated the agreement. Financial Impact- None Attachments — Agreement and design plans "Exhibit A" Recommendation- Motion to approve the Agreement between the City of Corcoran and Range Systems CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 COUNTY ROAD 116, CORCORAN MN 55340 763.420.2288 — OFFICE 763.420.6056 — FAX E -mail — general @ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site — www.ci.corcoran.mn.us AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between Range Systems, Inc., 5121 Winnetka Avenue North, New Hope, Minnesota 55428 ( "Range Systems ") and the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota with offices at 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, Minnesota 55340 ( "City ") RECITALS 1. Range Systems has designed an all steel bullet trap to be used by law enforcement and other entities for safe and efficient gun ranges. 2. Range Systems has offered to provide an all steel bullet trap prototype to the City police department for use on its gun range. a. The City believes this product has the potential to improve safety on the range and the surrounding area. b. By recycling bullet fragments the product would eliminate further lead contamination of the site. CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 COUNTY ROAD 116, CORCORAN MN 55340 763.420.2288 — OFFICE 763.420.6056 — FAX E -mail — general @ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site — www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 3. Range Systems has agreed to provide the bullet trap prototype at no cost to the City; Range Systems has stated that the production version of this bullet trap design would sell for approximately $70,000. 4. The City has agreed to accept the bullet trap as a gift and further agrees to execute all necessary gift form documents for IRS purposes; that Range Systems is responsible to provide the appropriate IRS form for signature and Range Systems is responsible to prove the gift amount to the IRS. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above, the parties agree as follows: 1) Range Systems shall provide to the City at no cost one all steel bullet trap prototype, depicted on the attached Exhibit A, and identified as Range Systems Steel Trap — 3 section, 12" Wide; Part Number TS 5500, Rev C. 2) The City agrees to accept the gift and execute all documents necessary for IRS purposes; that Range Systems is responsible to provide the appropriate IRS form and Range Systems is responsible to prove the value of this gift to the IRS. 3) The City shall prepare the site for installation of the bullet trap; Range Systems shall install the bullet trap at the City site and provide to the City documentation describing initial prototype qualification testing (The Test Plan) to be performed by Range Systems. 4) Following completion of the testing by Range Systems and review and approval of the results by the Corcoran Police Department, ownership of the bullet trap shall pass to the City; liability for its use shall be borne by the City except for any defects in design or manufacturing. a) Before use by City personnel, Range Systems shall provide to the City a full owner's manual with use perimeters and maintenance instructions. CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 COUNTY ROAD 116, CORCORAN MN 55340 763.420.2288 — OFFICE 763.420.6056 — FAX E -mail — general @ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site — www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 5) Range Systems warrants that the bullet trap, following installation, will function safely for its intended use and Range Systems agrees to make periodic inspections of the bullet for up to ten (10) years in coordination with the City police department. 6) Following safety inspections, Range Systems will provide, at no cost to the City, any safety improvements needed for the bullet trap; the City authorizes both the coordinated inspections and safety improvements on site by Range Systems. 7) In addition to the safety inspections above - identified, Range Systems will be permitted to test the bullet trap for market and safety improvements; such testing shall be coordinated with the City police department. 8) Upon execution of this Agreement, and upon preparation of the site by the City, Range Systems agrees to install the bullet trap on or before , 2011. Dated: Dated: Dated: RANGE SYSTEMS, INC. Its: CITY OF CORCORAN Ken Guenthner Its Mayor Jeanie Heinecke Its City Clerk 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 REVISIONS STEEL TRAP ZONE REV. DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED SIDE WALL DOCUMENT UPDATES - ADDED ALL B 9/2$/11 JOB PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB SIZE - ALL C DOCUMENT UPDATES - ADDED UPPER 10/3/11 JOB BEAM GUARD STEEL TRAP D D LOWER PLATE A A 15-10 " _ 1 1/2" 5" SLAB WIDTH -- - - -- -- - -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - -- - -� 6" CONCRETE SLAB L L DETAIL B r� 30' -0" - CONCRETE SLAB LENGTH TROUGH DETAIL UPPER BEAM GUARD, VIEW SCALE 1 : 8 500 W/ 2 DURA -PANEL 2' -6" THROAT STEEL TRAP STEEL TRAP UPPER BEAM OPENING LOWER PLATE SIDE WALL GUARD 3/8" AR500 1/4" AR500 STEEL TRAP STEEL TRAP UPPER PLATE THROAT OPENING 3/8" AR500 STEEL TRAP DECELERATION CHAMBER 12' -8" 10' -2" STEEL TRAP B MAX. , , SPENT ROUND B 10' -2" SHOOTING COLLECTION TRAP HEIGHT BUCKET HEIGHT 4' 6" TO 6' 6" PRIMARY SHOOT 20° ZONE NOTES: LL 1. WIND LOAD RATED TO 100 MPH 2. SNOW LOAD RATED TO 150 PSF 12' -2" 3. CONCRETE SLAB WEIGHT = 32,400 LBS. SECTION A -A 4. STEEL TRAP WEIGHT = 15,700 LBS. TRAP WIDTH CONCRETE B CUT -AWAY 5. TOTAL WEIGHT = 48,100 LBS. SLAB SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW THICKNESS TOLERANCES DRAWN RANGE SYSTEMS A PRIMARY DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES IALTERNATE DIMS ARE HMI JOB 5121 Winnetka Avenue North A SHOOTING FRACTIONAL, va° D.0 = ..1° DATE 6�28�11 7 Y STEMS New Hope, MN 55428 ZONE MACH +0.5, 000 = ±010 BENDYST 0.0000 ENGINEER APPROVAL TITLE RANGE SYSTEMS STEEL TRAP - NFIDODDS RANGE SYSTEMS CONFIDENTIAL �06 THE WING INFORMATIO N SOLE PROPERTY IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF RANGE REPRODUCTION MATERIAL � 3 SECTION, 12 W I D E NvPART OR ANY S SEE BOM WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RANGE SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. FINISH SIZE SCALE PART NUMBER SHEET REV CAD FILES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST _ TMIRD PROTECTION CTION - - -- B 1:64 TS5500 1 OF 3 C DO NOT SCALE DRAWING 8 7 6 5 4 3 SOLIDWORKS 2007 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 D D C C B 0 B TOLERANCES DRAWN RANGE SYSTEMS A DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES IALTERNATE DIMS ARE MMI JDB RANGE ' 5121 Winnetka Avenue North A FRALTONAL. va° 0 0 - . I° DATE New Hope, MN 55428 ANGULAR, 1° 0.00 = ±.03" 6�28�11 L L MACH ± 0.5° 0.000 = ±.010" TITLE BEND ±ST 0.ONFI ±ENTI ENGINEER APPROVAL RANGE SYSTEMS STEEL TRAP - RANGE SYSTEMS CONFIDENTIAL JDB THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY RANGE SYSTEMS. REPRODUCTION OF F MATERIAL 3 SECTION, 12' W I D E ANY I IN PART OR AS A WHOLE SEE BOM WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RANGE SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. FINISH SRE SCALE PART NUMBER SHEET REV CAD FILES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST Fk °E °,I °N B 32 TS5500 20F 3 C DO NOT SCALE DRAWING 8 7 6 5 4 3 SOLIDWORKS 2007 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 D D 20' -0" 12' -0" SLAB PROPOSED WIDTH TRAP 16' -0" _ c FUTURE c TRAP EXPANDED B B 30' -0" SLAB LENGTH PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB SHADED AREA FOR FOR FUTURE EXPANSION FUTURE EXPANSION 20' X 30' X 6" THICK TOLERANCES DRAWN RANGE ' RANGE SYSTEMS A DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES IALTERNATE DIMS ARE MMI JDB 5121 Winnetka Avenue North A FRACTIONAL. 1- 0.0 = ..I° ANGULAR, 1° 0.00 = ±.010 DATE 6/28/11 C� C 7 Y 7 T EMS New Hope, MN 55428 L .L MACH ± 0.5° 0.000 = ±.010" TITLE T BEND ± 0.0000 = ±EN ENGINEER APPROVAL RANGE SYSTEMS STEEL TRAP - S T T I RANGE SYSTEMS CONFIDENTIAL JDB THE INFORMATION THE SOLE PROPERTY TTHIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SYSTEMS. REPRODUCTION MATERIAL 12" WIDE 3 SECTION, 12 WIDE ANY IN PART OR AS A WHOLE SEE BOM WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RANGE SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. FINISH SIZE SCALE PART NUMBER SHEET REV CAD FILES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST HIIIA,I °N B ;48 TS5500 30F3 C DO NOT SCALE DRAWING 8 7 6 5 4 3 SOLIDWORKS 2007 2 1 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Trails 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 952 -496 -4141 x 255 October 25, 2011 City of Corcoran Attention: Dan Donahue 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Dear Dan : t a DEPARTMENT OP NATURAL RESOURCES Please find enclosed three copies of the FY2012 Snowmobile Grant -In -Aid Agreements for the Northwest Trails Snowmobile Trails. Please have these agreements signed by the appropriate people and return them to me for processing. I will obtain the signatures from our agency. Once they are finalized I will return a copy to you for your records. if you have any additional questions please feel free to contact me. Thanks much. Sincerely, Martha J. Reger District Parks and Trails Supervisor Cc: Northwest Trails Attachments mndnr.gov An Equal Opportunity Employer DNR Information. 651- 296 - 6957 1- 888 -646 -6367 659 - 296.5484 1 -800 -657 -3929 MINNESOTA SNOWMOBILE TRAILS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SNOWMOBILE FY 2012 MAINTENANCE AND GROOMING GRANT AGREEMENT Local Unit of Government (Sponsor) Tiail.'Club Naive Grant Amount City of Corcoran Northwest Trails 536221.20 THIS AGREEMENT is made between the STATE OF MINNESOTA, acting by and through the Commissioner of Natural Resources, hereinafter referred to as the "State," and Local Unit of Government, hereinafter referred to as the "Sponsor" relating to the maintenance and grooming of the trails specified above; and WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to maintain trails for the enjoyment of the public; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Snowmobile Trails Assistance Program provides grants to local units of government for the maintenance of recreational trails pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 84.83; and WHEREAS, the Sponsor has applied to the State for a grant for said trails and has submitted the Minnesota Snowmobile Trails Assistance Program Maintenance and Grooming application form, maps, required attachments, and resolution of the Sponsor authorizing the proposed maintenance and grooming and said application form, map and resolution are attached and incorporated into this agreement as Exhibit A, hereinafter referred to as the "Plan "; and NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows: A. TRAIL OBLIGATION OF THE SPONSOR. The Sponsor agrees to maintain the proposed trails in accordance with the guidelines contained within the current Minnesota Snowmobile Trails Assistance Program Maintenance and Grooming Manual, hereinafter referred to as the "Manual" as accepted or amended by the State. All work will be the responsibility of the Sponsor, it's employees, or the sponsor's agent provided the agent is registered as a nonprofit corporation with the State of Minnesota. The Sponsor shall: 1. Proceed to acquire necessary interests in lands on the Trail. The Sponsor must acquire land in fee, easement, lease, permit, or other authorization for said Trail. The term of said interest shall be no less than four (4) months between November 15 of any year and April 1 of the succeeding year. For each parcel of land crossed by the Trail, the Sponsor shall obtain from the owner of said parcel a permit, lease, easement, deed, or other authorization for said crossing in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 604A_ The Sponsor shall certify that the necessary interests in the Iand have been obtained and are on file with the Sponsor or the sponsor's agent. 2. Provide adequate maintenance and grooming on the Trail, which shall include keeping it reasonably safe for public use; provide sanitation and sanitary facilities when needed; and provide other maintenance and grooming as may be required. The Sponsor and not the State is responsible for maintaining signs and maintenance and grooming of the Trail. E. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE. Upon the request of the Sponsor to the extent possible, the State will provide technical assistance with major problems encountered in the maintenance and grooming of the Trail. C. FUNDING. The State's sole responsibility under this Agreement is to provide funds to the Sponsor. In the event that state funds become unavailable because of legislative or executive action or restraints, the grant amount may be reduced or canceled by the State. Fot n revised 812010 1 of 5 D. DISBURSEMENT. The State agrees to disburse funds to the Sponsor pursuant to this Agreement based upon the satisfactory completion of significant performance benchmarks as identified in section F. This grant shall not exceed the Grant Amount as specified above. Funds not earned and paid out will be canceled annually at the end of the State's fiscal year (June 30). E. GROOMING. In order to receive maximum disbursement from this Agreement, the Sponsor agrees to groom the entire Trail referred to within the Plan in accordance with the Trail Grooming Guidelines established in the Manual. F. PAYMENT. 1. Trail Completion Benchmark, 40% of Total Grant Amount Disbursement of these funds is contingent on the sponsor providing a high quality map that shows the final alignment of the trail and a Trail Completion Certification Form that the trail is open and available for use. The certification must be received by December 15"' of that year. This includes having the trail brushed, bridges in repair, signs installed, gates were capable of being open (snow permitting), and any other additional work needed. Also the Sponsor ensures that interest in lands to operate a snowmobile trail have been acquired through fee, easement, lease, permit, or other authorizations of interest throughout the entire Trail. 2. Grooming Certification Benchmark, Opening — January 15, 25% of Total Grant Amount A portion of the grooming monies will be disbursed to the Sponsor by the DNR based upon the Certification of Satisfactory Grooming Form received from the Sponsor that the trails have been properly groomed from opening day through January 15t ". The certification must be received by February 15 "' of that year. The Sponsor in coordination with the Club must maintain sufficient records to document the activity. 3. Grooming Certification Benchmark, January 16 — Closing, 25% of Total Grant Amount The second disbursement of the grooming monies will be made to the Sponsor by the DNR based upon the Certification of Satisfactory Grooming Form received from the Sponsor and verification that the trails were groomed to the satisfaction of the Sponsor from January 16"' through the end of the season. The certification must be received by April 15`I' of that year. The Sponsor in coordination with the Club must maintain sufficient records to document the activity. 4. Trail Closure /Application Submission Benchmark, 10% of Total Grant Amount The final payment will be based upon the Trail Closure /Application Submission Certification form received from the Sponsor. The certification must be received by May 15 "'. A completed application for the next year must accompany the certification. Must provide evidence that Sponsor and Club attended spring training session conducted by DNR. A map indicating the "anticipated" alignment of the trail must also be submitted. A back -up grooming plan must also be provided. G. PENALTIES. a) If it is determined that the Trail Completion Certification benchmark in this Plan has not been satisfactorily completed but was certified as having been completed by the Sponsor, the Sponsor may be assessed a penalty of up to 40% of the Total Annual Grant Amount. b) If it is determined that the Grooming Certification benchmark for the period of opening day through January 15 in this Plan has not been satisfactorily completed but was certified as having been completed by the Sponsor, the Sponsor may be assessed a penalty of up to 25% of the Total Annual Grant Amount. Bonn revised 8,"2010 2 of 5 c) If it is determined that the Grooming Certification benchmark for the period of January 16 through the end of the season in this Plan has not been satisfactorily completed but was certified as having been completed by the Sponsor, the Sponsor may be assessed a penalty of up to 25% of the Total Annual Grant Amount. d) If it is determined that the Trail Closure /Application Submission Certification benchmark in this Plan has not been satisfactorily completed but was certified as having been completed by the Sponsor, the Sponsor may be assessed a penalty of up to 10% of the total annual Grant Amount. In addition to the above penalties, the State reserves the right to reduce payment in the following year's agreement or to exclude the Sponsor from participation in the Trails Assistance Program for up to 3 years. H. ACCOUNTING AND AUDIT. The Sponsor shall maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence relevant to this grant and in such detail that will accurately reflect the benchmarks that have been reached in this program and that have received payment. The Sponsor shall use generally accepted accounting principles and these records shall be retained for six years after this grant terminates. The State, its representative or the legislative auditor shall have the right to examine this evidence and the Sponsor shall make them available at the office at all reasonable times during the record retention period. Records shall be sufficient, as defined in the Manual to reflect significant costs incurred and volunteer donation of time, equipment, and/or materials in performance of this grant. 1. WORKER'S COMPENSATION. The Sponsor shall comply with the provisions for worker's compensation in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 176.181, Subd. 1 and 176.182 and all applicable rules and subsequent amendments thereto. J. LIABILITY. Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The provisions of the Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 3.736 and other applicable law shall govern the State's liability. The provisions of Minnesota Political Subdivisions Tort Liability, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.02 and other applicable law shall govern the Sponsor's liability. K. TERM. K.I Effective date: September 1, 2011, or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 2, whichever is later. K.2 Expiration elate: June 30, 2012, or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever is sooner. L. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the State in the event of a default by the Sponsor; the legislature appropriates insufficient monies for the program, or the abandonment of the Trail. The State and the Sponsor may also terminate it upon mutual agreement, upon 30 days' written notice to each entity. M. ASSIGNMENT OR MODIFICATION. The Sponsor may not assign any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the State. No change or modification of the terms or provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless sueh change or modification is in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. N. DATA DISCLOSURE. Under Minnesota Statutes § 270.66, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. Fonn revised 8.2010 3 of 5 O. GOVERNING LAW, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE. Minnesota law, without regard to its choice -of -law provisions, governs this grant contract. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this grant contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. P. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. The State's Authorized Representative is the Trail Area Supervisor from the Parks and Trails Division of the Department of Natural Resources for the area where the trail is located, or his /her successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Sponsors performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this grant contract. If the services are satisfactory, the State's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. A list of the Trail Area Supervisors can be found on the program webpage (http://files.dnr.state.nm.us/assistance/grants/recreation/xc ski /taw sites. df). The Sponsor's Authorized Representative is the contact person and individual who provide the authorized signature for the Sponsor, which can be found on the program application (incorporated here into this agreement by reference). If the Sponsor's Authorized Representative changes at any time during this grant contract, the Sponsor must immediately notify the State. The authorized representative of the sponsor is prohibited from being an officer or bookkeeper /accountant of the club or organization receiving this grant on behalf of the State. Form revised 8 2010 4 of 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT SPONSOR Local Unit of Government (Sponsor) State Encumbrance Verification Authorized Signature Title Date Authorized Signature Title Date DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by M.S. § 16A. 15 and Ibc.os. State Encumbrance Verification Date �' �•�w 4 t i SWIFT PO #: Signature (Reconunend for Approval) Parks and Traits Regional Date Manager Authorized signature Parks and Trails Division Date Director Fonn revised 8'2010 5 of 5 12a. Agreement between City of Corcoran, MN and the NM Trails Association This agreement made this _day of , 20 , between The City of Corcoran, MN hereinafter referred to as the local unit of government and NW Trails Association hereinafter referred to as the club. WITNESSED: Whereas the local unit of government desires to establish a public snowmobile trail system in furtherance of its public recreation objectives, and Whereas the club agrees to help and assist the local unit of government to acquire, construct and maintain said trail, and is registered as a nonprofit corporation, and Whereas the State of Minnesota offers financial and technical assistance to the local unit of government for the construction of an approve trail, and whereas the trail in connection with this agreement shall hereinafter be called NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES THERETO: The local unit of government or the club shall apply to the State of Minnesota - Department of Natural Resources - for financial and technical assistance in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations governing said assistance. If said assistance is granted, the local unit of government shall enter into a contract with the club for the acquisition of the necessary interests in land and the subsequent construction and maintenance of the trail. The contract shall specifically provide that any "work" in connection with the trail shall be in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement between the state and the local unit of government and such terms and conditions be incorporated in said contract by reference. Further the contract shall provide that the club will certify to the local unit of government upon completion of significant benchmarks of "work" on the trail. The local unit of government agrees to pay the club the appropriate percentage of the total grant amount for their "work" completed by the club on their portion of the trail system as agreed to with the other clubs in the trail system; the club will "absorb" the remainder of costs or obligations. In the event that a performance penalty is assessed on the sponsor, by the state, such penalty will be passed through to the appropriate club and be their obligation until satisfied. The contract shall specifically provide that the club will be operating as an independent contractor and that the local unit of government and the State of Minnesota shall not be responsible for workman's compensation of other employee benefits. 12a. Not withstanding the financial assistance provided in the state contract, the local unit of government shall not be liable for such costs as are incurred by the club because state funds are depleted. For the City of Corcoran, MN: Mayor City Administrator /City Clerk For the NW Trails Association: Club President Date: Date: Date: Club Secretary Date: CLAIMS LASTING CHECK RANGE: 19153 - 19187 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Date 11/9111 11/8/11 11011 11/8/11 Total 13a. Paid to Landform Landform Landform Landform Landform Landform Landform Landform Wenck Assoc Total 13b. Paid To NONE Agenda Item 13 a -c. Council Meeting Date: 11121/2011 Prepared By: jheinecke FUND #500 Escrow Claims Amount Project name 115.00 Satellite Shelters 10 -007 28.75 Custom Filtration 11 -008 86.25 Schwab 11 -013 143.75 Custom Filtration 11 -005 143.75 Anderson 11 -012 143.75 Shamrock Golf 11 -0 14 115.00 Schmid 11 -015 545.25 Highland Bank 11 -010 285.00 Custom Filtration 11 -005 1,607.50 Total Fund #500 (See attached Check Detail Register) Buildincl Inspection Claims Amount Total Building Inspections Claims (See attached Check Detail Register) 13c. All Other Claims (See attached Check Detail Register) Total of Auto Deductions Auto Deductions ! Paid to PERA CITISTREET- DEFERRED COMP CITISTREET - HEALTH SAVINGS US BANK -HSA TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL Electronic Fund Transfer 1 Other Disbursements Amount 7,665.99 3,057.00 5,523.77 3,810.56 20,057.32 $ 1,607.50 $ 53,310.21 $ 20,057.32 $ 74,975.03 H:1City Hall Information\CITY GOVERNMENTICouncil, Commissions & Committees\Council InformationlCouncil Claims12011 Claims.xis CORCORAN,MN 11/16/11 4:49 PM Page 1 *Check Detail Register@ November 2011 E 100-41900-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 Farmers State Bank Professional Srvs (GENERAL) E 100-41900-300 Paid Chk# D f 9153 TM Mdi Legal Fees E 100-42100-304 E 100-41951-207 Computer Supplies $380.64 1672664 ACRONIS LICENSE RENEWAL $5,042,87 Total ACRONIS SERVICES $380.64 $7,977.04 'Paid drki"M16-41 —1/2-1—/201-1—B E--CH—TO—LD—, E 100-43100-130 Employer Paid FSA $350.00 BOOT 2011 FSA REIMB E 100-43100-417 Uniforms $175.00 BOOT 2011 BOOT ALLOWANCE Total BECHTOLD, CLYDE $525.00 Paid Chk# -C &'i-1 r2 Ti2- 6 -1-1 -e E 100-41900-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) E 401-41900-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) E 100-41900-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) E 100-41900-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) E 205-42100-304 Legal Fees E 100-42100-304 Legal Fees Total CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER Paid Chk# 019156 1112112011 CDW GOVERNMENT E 100-41951-207 Computer Supplies E 100-41951-207 Computer Supplies Total CDW GOVERNMENT 'Paid —6 —6-19 —11H —1f --eiii4-f iikP& 'N'-T,-E- E 100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) E 100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) Total CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON Paid Chk# 019158 11/2112011 CINTAS - 470 E 100-42100-223 Building Repair Supplies E 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) E 100-43100-417 Uniforms E 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) E 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) E 100-43100-417 Uniforms Total CINTAS - 470 Piiij'C `6 CS�Ekii&i $1,214.58 110111 CIVIL LEGAL $435.42 110111 LEGAL $435.42 110111 RANGE BULLET TRAP $825.00 110111 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY $23.75 110111 LEGAL $5,042,87 110111 CRIMINAL $7,977.04 $49.38 1689596 SATA CABLE AND SURGE STRIPS $381.96 1758778 SONICWALL RENEWAL LICENSE $431.34 $22.75 102711 NATURAL GAS $32.03 102711 NATURAL GAS $54.78 $29.05 470728744 FLOOR MATS $40.25 470728745 City Hall Scraper Mat $87.32 470728746 PW Uniforms $40,25 470732153 City Hall Scraper Mat $82.21 470732154 PW Towels $86.94 470732155 PW Uniforms $366,02 E205-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $277.88 105561 TOW SEIZED VEHICLE Total CITYWIDE SERVICE ... .. . .. .. . . . . ... . .. .. ...... - $277.88 E 100-43100-225 Landscape/Ditch Materials $237.31 59774 PARTS Total DIAMOND MOWERS $237.31 Paid Chk# 019161 11/21/2011 DONALD SALVERDA 8� ASSOC E 100-41300 -208 Training and Instruction $96.08 P11013C 2001 ADVANCED EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT CORCORAN, MN 11/16/11 4:49 PM Page 2 Check Detail Register@ November 2011 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOC $96.08 Paid Chk# 019162 11/21/2011 HEINZ, BRANDON �' E 100 -43100 -417 Uniforms $175.00 BOOT 2011 Boot Allowance Total HEINZ, BRANDON $175.00 E 100 -42100 -301 Prisoner $63.31 3892 HC SHERIFF'S OFFICE JAIL INTAKE PROCESS FFE OCT 2011 Total HENN CO SHERIFFS OFFICE $63.31 E 100 -42100 -323 Radio Units $746.07 111038008 MDC SUPPORT FEE E 1 00- 431 00 -2 1 0 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $112.00 111038098 RADIO ADMIN FEE E 100 -42100 -323 Radio Units $48.09 11162018 CAD VISOR CONNECTION ............. ............................... Total HENN CTY INFO TECH $906.16 - ,-�w_�,m ..,._ �. �,... Paid Chk# 019165 11/21/2011 LANDFORM E 100 -41910 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $28.75 20389 MEETINGS E 100 -41910 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $881.93 20390 GENERAL PLANNING G 500 -20262 Satellite Shelters 10 -007 $115.00 20390 PLANNING G 500 -20278 Custom Filtration 11 -008 $28.75 20391 PLANNING E 100- 42100 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $546.25 20391 RANGE PROJECT 11 -011 G 500 -20201 Unallocated $86.25 20391 SCHWAB CERT OF COMPLIANCE 11 -013 G 500 -20272 Custom Filtration 11 -005 $143.75 20391 PLANNING G 500 -20201 Unallocated $143.75 20391 ANDERSON AG PRESERVE 11 -012 G 500 -20281 Shamrock Golf 11 -0 14 $143.75 20391 PLANNING G 500 -20201 Unallocated $115.00 20391 SCHMID BUILDING RIGHTS 11 -015 E 140- 41910 -300 Professional' Srvs (GENERAL) $200.00 20391 CITY MEETINGS E 100 -41910 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $2,202.23 20391 GENERAL PLANNING G 500 -20279 Highland Bank 11 -010 $546.25 2.0391 PLANNING Total LANDFORM $5,181.66 ,„ . _� „., „.0 ,.,,�.. _m_ mw ._ �. �.� .,.,._ ., n. �- .__., .,.K.........�.._,w,..... Paid Chk# 019166 11/21/2011 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE E 100 -43100 -220 RepairlMaint Supply (GENERAL) $534.38 48001 REPAIR ........... ............................... Total LITTLE FALLS MACHINE $534.38 Paid Chk# 01916711121/2011 LMCIT�,,a „a E 100-43100-364 Worker's Comp insurance $256.86 110111 WfC DEDUCTIBLE Total LMCI:T $256.86 PaidzCl�k #�019168Y��WV1112112011 �l4lEISTER PAT E 100 -43100 -417 Uniforms $175.00 BOOT 2011 BOOT ALLOWANCE Total MEISTER PAT $175.00 Pal' ' &k# 019169 — 11121!2011, - ,MENARDS�� E 100 -41941 -400 Repairs & Maint Cant (GENERAL $18.47 50834 SUPPLIES E 1 00 - 431 00 -21 0 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $233.24 52594 SUPPLIES CORCORAN, MN 11/16/11 4:49 PM Page 3 *Check Detail Register© November 2011 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total MENARDS $251.71 Paid Ghk# 01917q 11/21/2011 METROPOLITAN AREA `MGRS E 100- 41300 -208 Training and Instruction $20.00 615 AUG 2011 MEETING E 100 -41300 -208 Training and Instruction $20.00 644 OCT 2011 MEETING rotal METROPOLITAN AREA MGRS ASSOC $40.00 E 100 -41900 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $1,400.00 18216 LAND APPRAISAL Total NAGELL APPRAISAL & CONSULTING $1,400.00 Paid Chk# 019172h { 11/21/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS CORCORANR�um E 100 -421OD -220 RepairlMaint Supply (GENERAL) $3.73 798027 FASTNERS E 100 - 43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $9.06 800996 SUPPLIES E 100 - 42100 -220 RepairlMaint Supply (GENERAL) $22.63 810735 CLEANING SUPPLIES E 100 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $26.81 810736 SUPPLIES E 100- 43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $86.77 810738 SUPPLIES E 100- 42100 -220 RepairlMaint Supply (GENERAL) $42.95 813894 DURANGO BATTERY E 201 - 42100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $339.86 819178 PORTABLE JUMP STARTER Total NAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORAN $531.81 Pa Chk#_019173w :_�� 112 120T 1 r. �...� ..,.,.....�..�....� ...... ... . .. .- .......,..ri_. ,.M.. ,,..� _., -. rv..... .__, FFICE DEPOT E 100 -41941 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $548,97 584422998001 SUPPLIES E 100 - 41941200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $13.17 584423051001 SUPPLIES Total OFFICE DEPOT $562.14 E 100-43100-220 RepairlMaint Supply (GENERAL_) $230.67 1085812 PARTS E 100 -43100 -220 RepairlMaint Supply (GENERAL) $40.38 1085886 PARTS E 100 - 43100 -220 RepairlMaint Supply (GENERAL) $379.99 1086535 PARTS Total SCHARBIER & SONS $651.04 _ .... _ _ Paid Chk#' 019175��M� "��9 9 /2 11201 1�:,��µSCHMID,bJEFF E 100 - 43100 -417 Uniforms $175.00 BOOT 2011 2011 Work Boots Allowance Total SCHMID, JEFF $175.00 Paid Chk# 019176 11/2112011. STRETCHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT E 100- 42100 -417 Uniforms $59.99 1878233 DAHLOUIST ...... ... ..... .. Total STREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT $59.99 Paid�Ghk# E 100 -41941 -352 General Notices and Pub Info $42.75 1346954 DELINQUENT FEES PUBLIC HEARING E 100-41941-352 General Notices and Pub Info $54.86 1346956 ANDERSON AG PRESERVE Total SUN PRESS & NEWSPAPERS $97.61 E 415 -41910 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $368.19 2011003080 PARK ORDINANCE UPDATE E 100 - 41900 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $368.20 2011003080 PARK ORDINANCE UPDATE CORCORAN, MN 11/16/11 4.49 PM Page 4 `Check Detail Register@ November 2011 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total TKDA $736.39 E 100 - 43125 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $1,816.88 334183 TRUCK PARTS Total TOWMASTER $1,816.88 Paid Chk #� U19180^� � 11/21/2011 TRIi51GHT E 100 -41900 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $585.00 210782 PERSONNEL INVESTIGATION E 100 -45200 -380 Total TRUSIGHT $585.00 110811 75TH AVE & HWY 116 Paid Chk# 019181 11/21/2011 US BANK $9.73 110811 CIVIL DEFENSE SIREN E 100 -41941 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL_) $45.50 ......... ............................... 7226695 HSA MAINTENANCE FEE E 1OD- 43100 -381 Total US BANK $45.50 110811 CTY RD 101CTY RD 116 SIGNAL E 100- 41941 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $19.83 110811 SCHOOL PROPERTY E 100- 43232 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $5,832.63 .. . .._ _ ...................... 604629015933 RECYCLING BALL PARK Total WASTE MANAGEMENT $5,832.63 $21.11 110811 Cc Rd 10 & 50: 7700 E 100- 41941 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $793.51 E 100 -43170 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $171.00 1104159 HIGHWAY 55 DETOUR E 100 -43170 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $180.00 1104159 GENERAL MEETINGS E 100- 43170 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $114.00 1104159 COUNCIL MEETINGS E 100- 43170 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $91.20 1104159 STORMWATER WCA E 100- 43170 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $72.50 1104159 MUNICIPAL STATE AID E 100 - 43170 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $57.00 1104159 CITY TRAFFIC ITEMS G 500 -20278 Custom Filtration 11 -008 $285.00 1104159 ENG PRE CON E 401 - 41900 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $18,246.32 1104161 ENGINEERING E 100 - 43170 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $684.00 1104162 PW FACILITY Total WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. $19,901.02 id Chk# 019184 11]2112011 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE E 100 -41920 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $18.00 671622 TIRE REPAIR ...................... Total W ESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $18.00 Paid Chk# 019185 11/21/2011 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC E 100 -45200 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $10.56 110811 8200 COUNTY RD 116 E 100 -45200 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $12.56 110811 75TH AVE & HWY 116 E 100 - 42100 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $9.73 110811 CIVIL DEFENSE SIREN E 100- 42100 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $9.84 110811 SIREN MAPLE HILL E 1OD- 43100 -381 Street/Signal Lights $36.23 110811 CTY RD 101CTY RD 116 SIGNAL E 100- 41941 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $19.83 110811 SCHOOL PROPERTY E 100 -45200 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $65.38 110811 BALL PARK E 100 -43100 -381 Street/Signal Lights $21.11 110811 Cc Rd 10 & 50: 7700 E 100- 41941 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $793.51 110811 8200 COUNTY RD 116 E 100 - 42100 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $19.00 110811 6510 CTY RD 1161SIREN 150 -1680 E 100 -43100 -381 Street/Signal Lights $12.56 110811 Cc Rd 10 & Maple Hill: 7300 E 100- 43100 -381 Street/Signal Lights $21.11 110811 Co Rd 10 & Treptaus: 7400 E 100 - 43100 -381 StreetlSignal Lights $21.11 110811 Co Rd 10 & St Thomas: 7500 E 100 - 43100 -381 Street /Signal tights $21.11 110811 Co Rd 10 & Stanchion: 7600 CQRCQRAN, MN 11/16/11 4:49 PM Page 5 *Check Detail Register@ November 2011 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 100 - 43100 -380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $172.67 110811 PUBLIC WORKS Total WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC $1,246.31 E 100 -43100 -381 Street /Signal Lights $24.93 110311 Street Lighting ................. .............. Total XCEL ENERGY $24.93 Paid Chk# 019187 11/21/2011 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC E 100- 42100 -212 Motor Fuels $903.94 459601 SQUAB FUEL E 100- 43100 -212 Motor Fuels $367.92 460728 DIESEL E 100 -42100 -212 Motor Fuels $1,398.65 461907 SQUAD FUEL E 100 -43100 -212 Motor Fuels $632.78 461908 DIESEL Total YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC $3,303.29 10100 Farmers State Bank $54,917.71 Fund Summary 10100 Farmers State Bank 100 GENERAL FUND $33,618.79 201 RESERVES DONATION FUND $339.86 205 DWI FORFEITURE FUND $301.63 401 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING $18,681.74 415 PARK CAPITAL FUND $368.19 500 ESCROW HOLDING FUND $1,607.50 $54,917.71 City of Corcoran Consultant Summary 1112'112011 Name Invoice Date Check # Amount Due Carson, Clelland & Schreder 11/01/11 19155 7,977.04 Landform 11/03/11 19165 5,181.66 Nagel[ Appraisal & Consulting, 11/04111. 19171 1,400.00 TKDA 11/03/11 19178 736.39 Wenck Assoc 11/07/11 19183 19,901.02 Total 35,196.11 HACity Hall Information\CITY GOVERNMENTICouncil, Commissions & Committees\Council lnformation\Council Claims12011 Claims.xls CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER Attorneys at Law 6300 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY STE 305 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55430 -2190 (763)-561 -2800 November 01, 2011 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 CO RD 116 CORCORAN, MN 55340 Professional Services ivil Amount 10/4/2011 Conference with Tanya regarding code enforcement 45.83 10/10/2011 Roehlke Property: Review notes for meeting of 10/11/11 from Kent and Mayor 137.50 10/13/2011 Preparation for meeting; review. of Minn. Stat. 429 and issues relating to feasibility notices 275.00 and public works file Attend meeting 229.17 10/18/2o11 Staff meetings regarding escrows 183.33 10/20/2011 Review data request (Brand) ; conference with Dan and review of Data Practices Act 137.50 10/21/2011 Continued review of Data Practices Act; correspondence to Dan and Tanya 206.25 SUBTOTAL: [ 1,214.581 .Public Works 10/7/2011 Conference with Attorney Pearson; conference with Mayor Guenthner; review issues of 275.00 purchase 10/11/2011 Staff meeting it Corcoran; preparation for and attendance at meeting 275.00 10/14/2011 Follow up from council meeting; review of notes and correspondence to Bill Waytas 91.67 10/17/2011 Review file; conference with Waytas regarding appraisal; review engagement letter; 183.33 conference with Attorney Pearson SUBTOTAL' [ 825.00] Rar ge Bullet Trap 10/18/2011 Staff meeting regarding gun range trap; conference with Sean and John 91.67 10/19/2011 Draft of agreement between police department and Range Systems Inc.; send agreement to 275.00 John and Sean for review 10/24/2011 Review gun range bullet trap file; review email correspondence from Sean and email Exhibit 68.75 A documents to Sean SUBTOTAL: [ 435.42] CITY OF CORCORAN Page 2 Amount .Sewer and Water 10/10/2011 Conference with Kent regarding feasibility study and other matters relating to project 68.75 10/18/2011 Staff meeting 229.17 10/19/2011 Review Minn. Stat. 429; review notes from Jeanie regarding applications and 137.50 correspondence to Jeanie SUBTOTAL: [ 435.42] Criminal 9/27/2011 Preparation for and attendance at Pretrials and Arraignments 285.00 Attend motion hearing; correspondence with defense attorney and Court Administration; 269.17 preparation and assemble exhibits and note files Call with Deputy; revisions to complaint and memorandum to file 47.50 9/28/2011 Jury trial preparation; review files; correspondence with defendants and defense attorneys; 47.50 note fifes and instructions to legal assistant 9/29/2011 Preparation for and attendance at Prosecutor's meeting 31.67 Jury trial preparation; review and review files; select witnesses; review motion documents; 356.25 memorandums to the files and instructions to legal assistant Review transcript; additional jury trial preparation and note file 166.25 Select witnesses in upcoming cases; review email correspondence and memorandums to 31.67 the files; review case histories 9/30/2011 Conference with Officer Hunter regarding Koppi testimony; jury trial preparation and note file 190.00 Correspondence with Court Administration 23.75 10/3/2011 Discuss Koppi with Attorney John Thames 31.67 Preparation for 1014/11 calendar 23.75 10/4/2011 Preparation for Arraignment and Pretrials calendar; review files; correspondence with victims 23.75 and officers; review discovery and instructions to legal assistant Attend Arraignment and Pretrial calendar 31,67 10/5/2011 Attend Arraignment, Pretrial and In Custody calendar 55.42 Correspondence with victims, witnesses and Judge; review order and jury trial preparation, 63.33 review files, memorandums to the files and instructions to legal assistant Preparation of disposition fetter regarding 10/4/11 files; review files; preparation of 31.67 memorandums to the files and instructions to legal assistant; preparation of correspondence to victims and witnesses; select witnesses for upcoming hearings 10/6/2011 Correspondence with defense attorneys and Court Administration; draft response to Court 95.00 order Discuss upcoming trial with Attorney John Thames 95.00 10/712011 Correspondence with defense attorneys, defendants and Court Administration; confirm and 23.75 verify case resolutions; preparation of disposition letters, review files; correspondence to victims and witnesses; jury trial preparation, review files and select witnesses Research refusal elements and JIGS; note file 23.75 Preparation of correspondence to Police Chief regarding source code cases 31.67 10/10/2011 Correspondence with defendants, Court Administration and defense attorneys; preparation 39.58 for 10/11/11 arraignment, pretrials and rasmussen calendar; review files; review files and memorandums to the files 10111/2011 Attend Arraignment, Pretrials and Rasmussen calendar; correspondence with witnesses and 31.67 note files Preparation for 10/12/11 calendar 23.75 10/12/2011 Review case resolution; preparation of disposition letter, review files, preparation of 31.67 correspondence to victims and witnesses; jury trial preparation; correspondence with defense attorneys and defendants CITY OF CORCORAN page Amount 10/12/2011 Telephone conference with attorney for reporting party and victim in domestic; subpoena of 95.00 officers and instructions to legal assistant Attend Arraignment and Pretrial calendar 31.67 10/13/2011 Correspondence with defense attorneys, conferences and Court Administration; preparation 23.75 of disposition letter; review files; preparation of correspondence to victims and witnesses; note files 10/14/2011 Preparation of disposition letter; review cases; preparation of correspondence to witnesses 39.58 and victims and select witnesses for upcoming hearings; preparation for upcoming contested cases 10/17/2011 Review hearing transcript; jury trial preparation and note file 95.00 Discuss Koppi trial with Attorney John Thames 47.50 10/18/2011 Jury trial preparation; review files; email correspondence with defense attorneys; review 95.00 discovery and note files Preparation of one complaint 40.00 Preparation for and attendance at Arraignment, Pretrial calendar 95.00 10/19/2011 Jury trial preparation; correspondence with defense attorneys, defendants; memorandums to 39.58 the files and instructions to legal assistant Preparation of one complaint 40,00 Correspondence with defendants and defense attorneys; address discovery issues; 39.58 preparation of correspondence to victims; review supplemental reports and memorandums to the files Preparation for and attendance at pretrial and Arraignment calendar; disposition letter and 190.00 follow up Review police reports regarding discovery request and respond to defense attorney 47.50 10/20/2011 Preparation of memorandum regarding Wednesday's calendar; preparation of disposition 31.67 letter 10/21/2011 Review case for complaint; review case history and reissue charges 31.67 10/23/2011 Preparation for 10/24/11 calendar 221.67 10/24/2011 Preparation of correspondence to defense attorneys; jury trial preparation; review files; 47.50 review discovery; preparation for 10/25/11 Arraignment and pretrials calendar Attend jury trial hearing downtown; preparation of disposition letter; preparation of 55417 memorandums to the files; preparation of correspondence to victims 10/25/2011 Attend Arraignment, pretrials and Morrisey calendar; preparation of correspondence to 63.33 probation officer and victims; note files Prepare for Arraignment and Pretrial calendar; jury trial preparation; review files; 23.75 memorandums to the files and instructions to legal assistant Research admissibility of evidence; note files 23,75 10/26/2011 Attend Jury trial, Pretrial and Arraignment calendar 95.00 10/27/2011 Preparation of criminal complaints; preparation of cases for trial, court and jury; contact and 848.75 notice to witnesses for trial testimony for monthly period SUBTOTAL: ( 4,966.28] Vehicle Forfeiture: 10/1012011 Review status of forfeiture cases 23.75 SUBTOTAL: 23.75] For professional services rendered $7,9QQ.45 CITY OF CORCORAN Page 4 Client Expense Charges : Amount Criminal Expenses: Monthly support fee 14.43 Westlaw charges for September 23.16 Legal process service 39.00 SUBTOTAL: 76.591 Total Client Expense Charges $76.59 Total amount of this bill $7,977.94 Previous balance $5,130.25 10/21/2011 Payment - thank you ($5,130.25) Total payments and adjustments ($5,130.25) Balance due $7,977.04 I hereby declare under the penalties of perjury that the foregoing statement for legal services is just and correct and that no part thereof has been paid. effrey A. Carson, City Attorney City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 '° 4 'E' F O R M 44 �{ a1nlbUrsai}�e Payee Lindahl, Kendra Total Reimbursable for Invoice Z-A Amount $19.43 $19.43 Total Charges for $19.43 002 Ordinance 60 as. Professional Services Employee Undahl, Kendra Total Professional Services far .002 Hours Rate Amount 7.50 115.00 $852.50 $862.50 Total Charges for .002 $862.50 10 A07 Satellite Shclters lr1€c (city fkle 10 U07) Professional Services Employee Lindahl, Kendra Total Professional Services for 10.007 Total Charges for 10.007 Hours Rate Amount 1.00 115.00 $115.00 $115.00 $115.00 Invoice Amount $996.93 Please remit to: Landforrn, 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Bill Review Report - Landform Professional Services, LLC As of Monday, October 31. 2011 COR10008.GEN City of Corcoran Projects City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran MN, 55340 Billing Description P.O. # Prin. Lazan, Darren 8 P.M. Lindahl, Kendra Rate Schedule 2011 Corcoran City Rates Unbilled Detail Date HrslUnft bate Marko COR10008.GEN- .002 -PT P&T Plan Update &� Maps Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/10/2011 0.50 115.00 follow up with Sherri Buss on Park Dedication ordinance questions from PC (tabled item) Lindahl, Kendra Principal 1011312011 0.50 115.00 coordination with Sherri for Nov 3rd PC meeting Total Labor 1 A0 Other Direct Charges Exp Code: Reimb Project Mileage 35.00 Lindahl Kendra 10/612011 35.00 PC public hearing an parks ordinance update Total Other Direct Charges 35.00 COR1000S.GEN- .002 -RZ Revise Zoning Districts to Reflect Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10113(2011 1.50 11500 internal project close oufiriling- -WRITE OFF Total Labor 1.50 COR10008.GEN- .002 -5C Subdivision Code Update Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10117/2011 2.00 115.00 review June PC changes and update materials for CC meeting Lindahl, Kendra Principal 1011 &12011 2.50 115.00 finatize and send subdivision ordinance packet for council meeting Total tabor 4.50 COR10008.GEN- .002 -ZM Zoning Map Update Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 1011112011 0 -50 115.00 print and mount zoning maps for city hall Total Labor 0.50 COR10008.GEN- 10.007 -61 Meeting with Applicant Labgr Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/12/2011 1.00 115.00 Markup Hold Charge 0.00 134.43 0.00 57.50 0,00 57.50 0.00 115.00 0.00 19.43 0.00 19.43 0.00 19.43 0.00 172.50 0.00 172.50 0.00 172.50 0.)0 517.50 0.00 230.00 0.00 2$7.50 0.00 517.50 0.00 57.50 0.00 57.50 0,00 57.50 0,00 11500 0.00 115.00 111312011 7:16:43 AM 1 of 3 0.00 19.43 0.00 19.43 0.00 19.43 0.00 172.50 0.00 172.50 0.00 172.50 0.)0 517.50 0.00 230.00 0.00 2$7.50 0.00 517.50 0.00 57.50 0.00 57.50 0,00 57.50 0,00 11500 0.00 115.00 111312011 7:16:43 AM 1 of 3 0.00 230.00 0.00 2$7.50 0.00 517.50 0.00 57.50 0.00 57.50 0,00 57.50 0,00 11500 0.00 115.00 111312011 7:16:43 AM 1 of 3 111312011 7:16:43 AM 1 of 3 0 Q11 F City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 N o. 20389 11/03/2011 '61 Nleet�ngs W3fh Appl�oant ` Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra 25 115.00 $28.75 Total Professional Services for 61 Total Charges for 61 $28.75 $28.75 Invoice Amount $28.75 Please remit to: Landform, 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Page 1 of 1 Bill Review Report - Landform Professional Services, LLC As of Monday, October 31, 2011 Project COR09007.001 Ess Addition PP & FP: (05 -017 & 08 -003) Client City of Corcoran P.O. # 8200 County Road 116 Prin. Lazan, Darren B Corcoran MN, 55340 P.M. Lindahl. Kendra Bak- Schedule 2011 Corcoran City Rates Billing Description Unbilled Detail hate Hrs /Units COR09007.001 -61 Meetings with Applicant Lr Undahl, Kendra Principal 10/14/2011 0.25 call from Tom E'ss about status of plat (expired) and escrow balance Total Labor 0.25 Rate Markup Hold Charge 0.00 28.75 115.00 0.00 28.75 0.00 28.75 11/3/2011 7:17:03 AM 1 of 1 D A NJ �F-111 City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 F 0 R M Markup Amount oct plot 2 8.75 3.00 1.00 No. 20391 11/0312011 . ... .. .......... Reimbursables Payee Landform Professional Services, LLC Landform Professional Services, LLC Lindahl, Kendra Total Reimbursable for Invoice Unit Rate Qty Markup Amount oct plot 2 8.75 3.00 1.00 $26.25 oct plot 2 10.00 3.00 1.00 $30,00 67 .56 74.00 1.15 $47.23 $103.48 Total Charges for $103.43 . ....... ... custom 11 and U h .. .... 006. F Itratl:.o P, ty'M# Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra 1.25 115.00 $143.75 Total Professional Services for.005 : .. :1. $143.75 / Total Charges for .005 $143.751- .008 - :Custom Filtration Final. :P14f(dit�Al0 Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra .25 116-00 $28.75 Total Professional Services for .008 Total Charges far .008 $28.75 $28.75 Page 1 of 3 Project COR11009.GEN Corcoran Planning Services: General Invoice 20391 010 Nighlat d Pr ljm�nery rl "Prn l Plat 'NO file "11 010) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra 4.75 115.00 $546.25 Total Professional Services for .010 $546.25 Total Charges for .090 $546.25 017 - Corcoran lartge Prtsect (City file 17 01 "1) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra 4.75 115.00 $546.25 Total Professional Services for .011 $546.25 Total Charges for .011 $546.25 :k111" Andersan Ag PrQS0rve Enrollment �caty frle 11 012) Professional Services Employee Lindahl, Kendra Total Professional Services for .012 Hours Rate Amount 1.25 115.00 $143.75 $143.75 Total Charges for .012 $143.75 .013 - Schwab Cerfificate of Compliance ft�r,g Buildrrig ��ty ";file 11" -013) Professional Services Employee Lindahl, Kendra Total Professional Services far .013 Hours Rate Amount .75 115.00 $86.25 $86.25 Total Charges for .01.3 $86,25 014 ahamrocic Golf Course Site Plan Ameirtlirr�ent (city file 71 -014) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount 075 - :Schmid Bwl(111g Rights Appeal ty:fi[e 71 -0'15) Professional Services Employee Hours Rate Amount Lindahl, Kendra 1.00 115.00 $115.00 Total Professional Services for .015 $115.00 Total Charges for .015 $115.00 Page 2 of 3 Project CORI1009.GEN Corcoran Planning Services:General Invoice 20391 90 Ci;*y Business Professional Services MTG City,lVli6etlna. ...... . ........ ............. .. . Professional Services Employee Undahl, Kendra Total Professional Services for MTG Total Charges for MTG Flours Rate Amount 2.00 100.00 $200.00 .yGVV.VV ;Pcvv.vu Invoice Amount $4,155.98 Please remit to: Landform, 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Page 3 of 3 Bill Review Report - Landform Professional Services, LLC As of Monday, October 31, 2011 - .-- ..- ..- ..- . -.. - -- -... Project COR11009.GEN Corcoran Planning Services:General Client City of Corcoran P.O. # 8200 County Road 116 Prin. Lazan, Darren B Corcoran MN, 55340 P.M. Lindahl, Kendra Rate ScheduEe 2011 Corcoran City Rates Billing Description Unbilled Detail Date Hrs /Units Rate Markup Hold Charge COR11009.GEN- .001 -99 Expenses 0.00 56.25 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/10/2011 Other Direct Charges 115.00 0.00 57.50 Exp Code: Color Plots -30x42 .. . _.. 100 0.00. 2615 Landform Professional Services, LLC 10/31/2011 3.00 8.75 1.00 0.00 26.25 Zoning Maps Exp Code: Foam core 1.00 3.00 0:00. 30.00 Landform Professional Services, LLC 1013112011. 3.00 10.00 1.00 0.00 30.00 Zoning maps Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/5/2011 Total Other Direct Charges 6.00 0.00 56.25 COR11009 .GEN- .005 -30 Review Application 0.00 115.00 Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/10/2011 0.50 115.00 0.00 57.50 coordination with city staff and applicant on financial guaren tee Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/31/2011 0.50 115.00 0.00 57.50 site plan modification for landscaping plan -- review and approve Total Labor 1.00 0.00 115.00 COR11009.GEN- .005 -61 Meeting with Applicant 0.00 28.75 Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/5/2011 0.25 115.00 0.00 2815 call from contractor and dealing with financial guarantee issues Total Labor 0.25 0.00 2875 COR11009.GEN- .008 -61 Meeting with Applicant 0.00 28.75 Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/11/2011 0.25 115.00 0.00 28.75 coordinate with engineer on plat issues and send application materials Total Labor 0.25 0.00 28.75 COR11009.GEN- .010 -30 Review Application 0.00 115.00 Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/20/2011 1.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 review application materials and send complete letter Total Labor 1.00 0.00 115.00 11/312011 7:42:59 AM 1 of 6 Bill Review Report - Landform Professional Services, LLC As of Monday, October 31, 2011 CORI 1009.GEN- .010 -90 Repo rtslPresentation 431.25 Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal Labor 9/26/2011 0.25 115.00 Lindahl, Kendra Principaf 10/13/2011 1.00 115.00 parks report/follow with surveyor and attorney on legal description 9128/2011 2.00 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/14/2011 0.50 115,00 finalize parks report and send to Dan Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/12/2011 1.00 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/24/2011 2.00 115,00 begin review and prep of PC report Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/14/2011 0.50 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/2712011 0.25 115.00 call from applicant about PH next week Total Labor 3.75 Total Labor 3.75 COR11009.GEN- .011 -30 Review Application Labor 431.25 Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal Lindahl, Kendra Principal 9/26/2011 0.25 115.00 review materials from Jon and talk to Dan about process Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/17/2011 0.50 115.00 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 9128/2011 2.00 115.00 Meeting at city hall with Jon, Chief and Dan to discuss process 0.50 115.00 sent complete letter 230.00 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/12/2011 1.00 115.00 review materials for police before submittal Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/14/2011 0.50 115.00 review application and try to coordinate with engineer Total Labor 3.75 COR11009.GEN- .011 -90 Repo rtslPresentation Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/1712011 1.00 115.00 write administrative approval letter Total Labor 1.00 COR11009.GEN- .012 -30 Review Application Labor 431.25 Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/14/2011 0.25 115.00 review revised application and set up file 230.00 Lindahl, Kendra Principal Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/17/2011 0.50 115.00 discuss escrow and send incomplete letter 431.25 Lindahl, Kendra Principal Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/24/2011 0.50 115.00 sent complete letter 230.00 0.00 115.00 Total Labor 1.25 COR11009.GEN- .013 -30 Review Application 431.25 Labor 115.00 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/14/2011 0.25 115.00 call from Ebert about submittal requirement 230.00 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/17/2011 0.25 115.00 tried to review application but plans were not sent due to size. Review tomorrow at city hall./talk to Tanya at city hall and Ebert 431.25 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/18/2011 0.25 115.00 approve certificate of compliance at the counter 28.75 11/3/2011 7:42:59 AM 0.00 431.25 0.00 115.00 0.00 57.50 0.00 230.00 0.00 28.75 0.00 143.75 0.00 431.25 0.00 431.25 0.00 28.75 0.00 230.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 57.50 0.00 431.25 0.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 143.75 0.00 28.75 0.00 57.50 0.00 57.50 0.00 143.75 0.00 86.25 0.00 28.75 0.00 28.75 0.00 28.75 2of6 Bill Review Report - Landform Professional Services, LLC As of Monday, October 31, 2011 Labor Total Labor 0.75 0.00 57.50 0.00 86.25 COR11009.GEN- .014 -30 Review Application 0.00 115.00 Heinz Accessory building questions on Cain RoadlSara Anderson Ag Preserve at 16 -43 -0001 /Chris sewer and 0.00 143.75 Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/11/2011 1.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 DRC agendalagenda for tomorrow's staff meeting /question from Tanya about hoop houses /question about Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10120/2011 1.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 review application and send incomplete letter Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/13/2011 2.00 115.00 0.00 230.00 updating forms with City staff /misc. building permit questions/call from appraiser /call from 9825 high bluff/talk to Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/27/2011 0.25 115.00 Q,00 28.75 review missing informationlrequirements with Mark Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/17/2011 1.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 DRC agendalPlanning Project updatelcall from Ron about building rights Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/18/2011 2.25 115.00 Total Labor 1.25 0.00 14175 COR11009.GEN- .015 -30 Review Application 0.00 57.50 PC meeting agenda to Dan for reviewlquestions from city hall1building permit question from Heinz- -sent to BO 0.00 115.00 Labor subdivision at 19120 Mystiquelcall about zoning letter for 21414 Meadow Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/25/2011 0.50 115.00 0.00 57.50 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/20/2011 0.50 115.00 0.00 57,50 review application and send incomplete letter Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/25/2011 0.50 115.00 0.00 57,50 call from Ron /receipt of revised materials /draft and send complete letter Total Labor 1.00 0,00 115.00 CORI1009.GEN -90 City Business 0.00 2,098.75 Labor Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/3/2011 0.50 115.00 0.00 57.50 DRC agenda /call from landowner on Gleason about subdivision Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/10/2011 1.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 Heinz Accessory building questions on Cain RoadlSara Anderson Ag Preserve at 16 -43 -0001 /Chris sewer and water questions on Ebert PropertylBecky at Leonard Street and Dienard zoning questions /21414 Meadow lane sewer questionslstaff questions about Site Plan Modification for St. Thomas ramp Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/11/2011 1.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 DRC agendalagenda for tomorrow's staff meeting /question from Tanya about hoop houses /question about expiring ag preserve Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/1212011 4.00 115.00 0.00 460.00 Corcoran office hours--planning team lunch (2), meeting with Pillar homes (1), review misc. building permits with Tanya (1) Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/13/2011 2.00 115.00 0.00 230.00 updating forms with City staff /misc. building permit questions/call from appraiser /call from 9825 high bluff/talk to Luanne hagen about green acres and rural preserve and share with city staff/follow up to planning meeting RE assignmentlschedule meeting with Jeff and Jeanie to discuss negative escrows Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/14/2011 1.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 zoning calls/calls about sewer phasing plan and T1F project Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/17/2011 1.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 DRC agendalPlanning Project updatelcall from Ron about building rights Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/18/2011 2.25 115.00 0.00 258.75 city office hours -- building permit questionslplanning process questionslescrow process discussion with Jeanie and Jeff Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/21/2011 0.50 115.00 0.00 57.50 PC meeting agenda to Dan for reviewlquestions from city hall1building permit question from Heinz- -sent to BO Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/24/2011 1.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 DRC agenda and coordination with Dan /call from Jeanie about bees/call from Jeanie about garageslcall about subdivision at 19120 Mystiquelcall about zoning letter for 21414 Meadow Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/25/2011 0.50 115.00 0.00 57.50 call about ag preservelrequest for zoning letterlescrow review for Jeanie Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/26/2011 2.00 115.00 0.00 230.00 office hours -- review planning process with Jilllreview escrow balances for Jeanie 11/3/2011 7:42:59 AM 3 of 6 Bill Review Report - Landform Professional Services, LLC As of Monday. October 31, 2011 Lindahl, Kendra Principal 10/2712011 0.50 115-00 0.00 57.50 questions about windmNs/greenhouses/zoning Undahl, Kendra Principal 1013112011 1,00 115.00 0.00 115.00 ag preserve questions/zoning letter/DRC agenda /platting questions Total Labor 18.25 0.00 2,098.75 COR11009.GEN -99 City Expenses Exp Code: Reirnb Project Mileage Lindahl, Kendra Lindahl, Kendra COR11009.GEN -MTG City Meeting Undahl, Kendra PC meeting Lindahl, Kendra CC meeting Qther Direct Charges 74.00 1011212011 35,00 0.56 10/27/2011 39.00 0.56 Total Other Direct Charges 74.00 Labor Principal 1016/2011 1.00 100.00 Principal 10127/2011 1.00 100.00 Total Labor 2.00 0.00 47.23 0.00 47.23 000 22.34 0.00 24.89 0.00 47.23 07.00 200,00 110l13SENEWOOM 0.00 100.00 0.00 200.00 11/312011 7:42:59 AM 4 of 6 Nagell Appraisal & Consulting, Inc. 7515 Wayzata Blvd,, Suite 115 Minneapolis, MN 55426 952 -544 -8966 Fax: 952 - 544 -8969 BILL TO City Attorney of Corcoran C/O Carson, Clelland & Schreder Attn: Jeffery Carson 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway, #305 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Invoice DATE INVOICE # 11/4/2011 18216 TAX ID NUMBER 49- 0949600 PLEASE - RETURN ONE COPY OF INVOICE WITH PAYMENT File # TERMS Appraisal of: REP G 1110004 Due on receipt 11/4/2011 WRW DESCRIPTION RATE AMOUNT G1110004 - 23185 County Road 10 Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota 1,400.00 1,400.00 Total $1,400.00 TAX ID NUMBER 49- 0949600 PLEASE - RETURN ONE COPY OF INVOICE WITH PAYMENT Ir7voice TKDA Engineering Architecture Planning 444 Cedar Street Suite 1500 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 -2140 November 03, 2011 Project No: 0014855.000 Invoice No: 002011003080 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 COUNTY RD 116 CORCORAN, MN 55340 -2113 Project 0014855.000 Corcoran Park Ordinance and Design Stand For Professional Services in connection with Park Dedication Ordinance and Park Design Standards. TKDA Letter Proposal dated April 14, 2016, and signed April 14, 2010. Professional Services from September 25 2011 to October 29 2011 Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Sr Reg Planner Buss, Sherri 9/30/2011 3.00 113.29 339.87 finalize memos and attachments for PC meeting and send to city; revisions per planner request and reseed Buss, Sherri 10/12/2011 2.00 113.29 226.58 respond to questions from Planning Commission and send copies of reports to Dan Donohue per requust Buss, Sherri 10/2 5/2d 11 .50 113.29 56.65 planning commission memo Buss, Sherri 10/27/2011 .25 11129 28.32 copies of redline and final ordinance to city per request Buss, Sherri 1 012 8/2011 .75 113.29 84.97 finalize memo to Planning Commission for Nov. 3 Totals 6.50 736.39 Total Labor Billing Limits Total Billings Limit Rg[' 2' ping a Current Prior To -Date 736.39 4,178.94 4,915.33 5,700.00 784.67 736.39 Total this Invoice 1,1736.39 �a November 7, 2011 Mr. Dan Donahue City Administrator City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Dear Dan: Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Ctr. P.O. Box 249 Maple Nain, MN 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 Fax (763) 479 -4242 E -mail: wenckmp@Q venc€c.com Enclosed are our invoices for October 2011. Unbilled time for council meetings, travel, etc. totaled 2.0 hours last month. "Day -to -day" engineering involved dust control, the Highway 55 Task Force, drainage complaints and streets. The sewer and water project work involved the second feasibility report and financial planning with Northland Securities, If you have any questions as you review these invoices, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, WENCK ASSOCIATES INC. Kent Torve, P.E. T U 294- Corcoran%lnv6cesti2011%October 2011.decx � c U O F, U _ w � U co V V b p b n a d n W r ��e` W ti� D] mrnm d� omo v ' <N�ti M d M,, , }Nd rnro��m e " N W N b9 fR aR 6464 Hi Hi H3 fA EA d3 C9AA M -- Vr-- ---- -- --- -- 64 ----- 1M— ) )--69 f9 tl tl U bQ9 O O O o .n ono b3 U3 fH 69 69 69 eA ?4� t+l :..:: 69 b9 69 64 69 �4Fk 69 bi' a5 W O POP 00 n a O cp O q q q O m N f+ N a a N � N N M an d N Ef3 64 FA fA 64 `. x. 64 69 kR H} 69 � w P O O aabo �a�O a OHO O � M i b4 » us e<, c r � sn ea ea v3 os `i Frr �r av ev e9 fl w w 00 o n n o oN rno, ;.o 00 0 <o do 0 0 0 0 IZ w ra ea w, v-r » cv w w `� u9 ea eo w F 65 os » P+ Q O- A a m N d w i Oi o tl nr rn ea r w �, �y w 't cv K az N �L N n 00 N 4 .Q 694 W d LL N V3 � N 64 f" � N N h N N N h M T M M W M F;4 tq vy � O O d L tl 69 � d4 W tp sg (f] ea t3 c c Q � p SC O m © U N O C mL�N L7 F � 4f � t%:: m m m d '- N Cn m N m _� N m d Q _ a m m� m 'o: m v m m en "in o a U .0 £ N 6 � w � 0 U c° o.Cc), � c =NO—O -u.aN c . -`o.1O U m o "o '.c ' o x c m G o E, c ". 5 o c o UUi c' a£i � E.. 'n m c o o v o O�'im°iPQOS R� Err Ls K K m c 0 a €r7�aUC9Uay.��xU=UCn �� rna`u - a'ma`uc��c3a`w - Cc L . �;a`aamci�UU�c�awa000a M o E °0 0 #'oNoono 0 0 0 ,- n Q O Q Q Q ododoa P 4 Q 4 Q P R_ N if) N o m rn m m City of Corcoran November 2011 Invoices Invoice # Wenck project # Phase # Project name Subtotal Total 1104159 2294 -01 General Engineering Services 500 -01 General Meetings $180.00 500 -02 Council Meetings, Eng. Admin. $114.00 600 -01 Stormwater /WCA General Tasks $91.20 700 Municipal State Aid $72.50 700 -03 City Traffic Items $57.00 700 -04 Highway 55 Detour $171.00 o,1:7 800 -03 Custom Filtration $285.00 $970.70 1104161 2294 -10 Sewer and Water Utility Project 01 Pre- Project Concept Development $3,793.02 02 Feasibility Study $2,891.10 03 Plans and Specifications $72.50 05 Preliminary/Special Surve $8,089.70 11 Easements and Utilities $3,400.00 $18,246.32 T: 52294- CorcoranllnvoicesQD1 tl0cteber 2011.docx Ertgheers, • Sc1Gi,6tistse Invoice I October 31, 2011 Invoice No: 1104159 City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Project 2294 -01 Corcoran•. General Engineering Services Professional Services Throuah October 31. 2011 Phase 500 =01 General. Professional Personnel Nelson, Susan 1Venck Associates, inc. 1900 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359 -0249 Wenc < (763) 479420€1 Fax (753) 4794242 e ri#,accovntingcoteriic.cat -, Hours Rate Amount 3,00 60:00 180.00 Totals 3.00 180.00 Total Labor Phase :Total- Phase 500 -02: .Council Meetings and Engineering' Administrative Professional Personnel .. Torve, Kent 180.00 $180.00 `. Hours Rate Amount 114.00 114.00 :. Totals 1:00. 114.00 Total Labor 114.00 Phase To $114.00 Phase 600 -01 Professional Personnel Torve, Kent Phase .' km. row Stormwater/WCA General Tasks Hours Rate. Amount .80 114.00 ' 91.20 Totals .80 91.20 Total Labor 700 MUNICIPAL STATE AID Professional Personnel Terhaar, Edward 91.20 .. Phase Total $91.20. Hours Rate Amount .50 145;00 ` 72,50 Totals 50 72.50 Total Labor Phase 700 -03 City Traffic Items Professional Personnel Phase Total Hours Rate Amount INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Invoice balances not paid within 30 days of invoice are subject to 1 -1 /2 % 18 % annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41- 1520095 72.50 $72.50 Project 22940! 1104159 Corcoran General Engineering :Services Invoice Vande '.Top, :Vincent ;50 '. i 114.00 57.00 Totals .50 57,00 Total Labor 57,00 Phase Total _ $. 5. 7. .. 00 Phase 700 -04 Highway . 5 5 I3etour — Prof4selona Ii Personnel .: . . . . . . Hours Rate Amount Torve, lent 1.50 : 114.00 171.00 Totals 1.50 ..171.00 Total Labor': 171.00' Phase Total :$1.71.00 Phase 800-03. — . .� Custom Filtration Prolessiona! Personnel '. Hours . Rate Amount Torve .Kent 2:50 .':114.00 285.00 Totals 2.50 285.00 .: Total Labor 2$5.00 Phase Total . 285,00 . $2. 85. Total Invoice Amount _ $970.70': INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Invoice balances not paid within 30 days of invoice are subject to 1 -1/2 %0 18% annum -, Page ?. interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice.number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41- 1520095 Invoice October 31, 201 Invoice No: 104161 Dan Donahue City of, Corcoran 8200 County Road 116' Corcoran, MN 55340 Project 2294 -10 Sewer and Water Planning Professional Services Through October 31. 2011 Phase 01 PRE - PROJECT` CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Professional °Personnel Wenck Associates, Inc: MD Rimer Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Main, MN 553%4)249 WEi1Ck (763) 479.4200 Flix (763) 4794242 e -mail; acoaunbngTewenek.Com Hours . Rate Amount Libby, Heather 10/4/2011 5.00 500.00 Sewer Alternates Libby, Heather 10/6/2011 3.00 100:00 300.00 finalize memo Shuck, Jordan :. 10/4/2011 2.00 89.00` 178.00 mapping Tepfer, Jeff 10/19/2011 1.50 138.00 207.00 plans Torve, Kent 10/11/2011 3.50 114:00 399.00 Preparation resident meetings and open house conversations Torve Kent 10/12/2011 2:50 114.00 285.00. :. Alternates analysis and preparation for thursday council meeting Torve, Kent 10/13/2011 1.50 114:00 171.00 Meeting prep and developer south of CR 10 discussion Torve, Kent 10/17/2011. 3;50 114.00 399.00 Alternatives review and 429 notification: area Torve, Kent .10/18/2011 5.50 114.00 627.00 Project meeting, financial model memo for council, coordination with attorney and .financal Torve, Kent 10/25/2011 2.00 114,00 228,00 Financial: planning meeting and staff . scheduling Torve, Kent 10/31/2011 4:00. 114.00: 456.00 Revised FS and borings Totals 34:00 3,750.00 Total Labor Reimbursable Expenses Postage and Shipping Total Reimbursablles Unit Billing Geographic Inforrnation System AutoCAD /Intergraph Use Total Units 3,750.00 8.02 8.02 8.02 20.00 15.00 35.00 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Invoice balances not paid within .30 days of invoice are subject to 1 =1/2 %0.18% annum interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41- 1520095 . 35.00 Project 2294 -10 Sewer and:Water.Planning Invoice 1104161 Phase Total :' $3;793.02 Phase 02 Fl_ASIBILIIY STUDY . Professional Personnel :. Hours Rate. Amount Libby, Heather = 10128/2011 3.00.:.. 100.00 300.00 finalize feasibilty report Nelson, Susan 10/3/201:1 150 60.00 s 150.00 Open House flyer and memo Nelson Susan 10/4/2011 ' 20 60.00 12.00 Finalize open house cover;memo for council packet'. Nelson,.Susan 10/10/2011 3.10 60.00 186.00 Preparation for Open House Nelson, Susan .10/11/2011 3:30 6100. 198.Q0 Open House attendance Neison, :Susan 10/12J2011 30 60.00 18.00 PowerPoint slides = Alt ABC . Torve,:Kent 10/3/2011 2.50 :114.00.:.: 285.00 .::.. Alternatives and:cost estimates Torve,.Kent 10/4/2011 2:50 114,00; 2$5.00 Alternatives analysis and cost estimates Torve,.Kent /0/612011 3:00 114.00 342.00 St. Thomas Alternates Torve, Kent 10/7/2011 1:50 114.00 171,00 Alternatives review and coordination with :landowner Torve, .Kent 10]24/2011 2.50 .114.00 285.00 Feasibility_ Studies for alternatives .'. Torve,,Kent 10/28/2011 2.50 .114.00 285.00 `. Revisedfeasibilty5tudy for Nov 21 Vander' Top, Vincent. 10/4/201] 200 114.00; 228.00 Review alternatives'for downtown properties Vander Top, Vincent 10]11/2011 1;.00 114.00 ` .114.00 Prepare for open house Totals . 29;90 2,859.00 Total Labor 2,859.00 Reimbursable Expenses Report Supplies 32.10 Tota€ Reimbursables 32.10 32.10 ; Phase Total $2,891.10 Phase 03 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Professional Personnel Tours Rate Amount Bowers; Matthew 10/4/2011 . - 50 145.00: 72.50 Technical Review Totals 50 72.50 Total Labor. 72.50 Phase Total $72.50 Phase .05 PRELINIINARYjSPECIAL SURVEY INVOICES ARE. DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Invoice balances not paid within. 30 days of invoice are subject to 1 -1/20% 18% annurn Page 2 interest /finance charge.; Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41- 1520095 Project 2294 -10 Sewer and .Water Planning.. Invoice 1104161 Professional ?erson nel Flours Rate': Amount.. Boll, .Wesley 10/25/2011 3 50 98.00'' 343.00 Wetland Delineation Approval Claridge, ©ale 1 0/3/2011 5:00 151.00: 755.00 joint Wetland PeriniE Application Claridge, Dale 10/4/2011 5:00 151.00 755.00 Joint Wetland Permit Application Claridge, Dale . 10/5/2011 4:00 151.00 604.00 DNR Utility License' Application. Claridge, Dale 10/6/2011 1:OQ .. 151.00` 151.00 DNR Utility: License Application Claridge, Dale 10/7/2011 4.00 151.00. 604.00 DNR Utility License Application: Claridge, Dale 10/10/2011 4100 151.00: 604,00 Completed DNR Utility Crossing License Application' and mailed 3 copies out to the DNR; compiled PDF Version and emailed to Dan Donahue at Corcoran; .misce .'Claridge, Dale 10/12/2011 1.50 151.00 226.50 `a Review. typical Elm Greek WMC project review report for utility project; communication Claridge, Dale .10/13/2011 2.00 151.00 302.00. Call from 3: Kujawa to discuss project and additional information needed- discuss discuss with P. Massaro about similar pipeiing project and permitting documents we could use :as reference; followup with DNR Claridge, Dale 10/17/2011 1.00 151.00 151.00 . . Followup.with.Corps permitting status and schedule Claridge, Dale 10/18/2011 4.00 151.00 604.00 Review St. Paul Forcemain project for similar project to address wetland impacts and dewatering Claridge, Dale 10/20/2011 2.00 151.00: 302.00 Followup with DNR on Utility Crossing License;.review impacts Claridge, Dale 10/25/2011 .2:00 151M.. Followup on delineation review and work on review information requested by Elm Creek WMC Claridge, Dale 10/26/2011 8.00 151.00: 1;208.00 Finalize and submit` supplemental wetland- permit information (temp. . stockpiles) to Elm Creek WMC Claridge, Dale 10]27/2011 2.50:. 151.00 377.50 Followup on supplemental wetland permit:application submittal, commnication with Elrn Creek:WMC; review notice of application; filing Claridge, Dale 10/31/2011 4.50 ` 151.00 679.50 Followup with DNR Utility C rossi ng License 'App; soil boring RFQ Nelson; Susan! 10/3/2011 :50 60.00: 30.00. PDF wetland permit _ Dale': Torve : Kent 10/7/201'.1 80 :114.00 91.20 DNR and wetland - permitting coordination ..Totals 55:30 `: ..8;089.70 Total Labor 8,089.78 Phase total $8,089Jo Phase 11 EASEMENTS AND UTILITIES Reimbursable Expenses ..Engineering Supplies 3,400.00 INVOICES ARE DUE.UPON PRESENTATION, Invoice balances not paid within 30 days.of invoice are subject to 1- 1/2 %.18% annum` Page 3 interest/finance charge, Please reference the invoice number when 5ending.payment Federal:Tax`ID #41- 1520095 Project 2294 -10 Sewer and Water Planning Invoice 1104161 Total Reimbursables 3,400.00 3,400.00 Phase Total. $3,400.00 Total Invoice Amount $18,246.32 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. Invoice balances not paid within 30 days of invoice are subject to 1 -1/2% 18% annum - Page 4 interest/finance charge. Please reference the invoice number when sending payment, Federal Tax ID #41-1520095 Invoice October 31, 201 Invoice No: 1104162 Dan Donahue City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 MN 55340 Project 2294 -13 Public Works Building:: Prpfessional:Services Throunh October 31:•201 =we Nom Imo mow IN= =me maw am, ■••=1 Nam mmi • =mi. Now mem wow • wow mem ammo Nom • Nam •■•• •••• Nom Nom Ems ammo woo Phase 16 ROEHLKE PROPERTY COUNTY ROAD 19 Professional Personnel Torve, Kent Totals Total Labor Hours Rate. 6.00 114.00 6.00 Wenck Associates, Inc. IWO Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple IMein, MN 55355 -0249 Wend< I76 3) 4794200. . Fax (763)47i4242 e mail; accountinguivenck,c n Amount 684.00 684,00 Phase Total 684;00 $684.00 Total Invoice Amount $684.00 INVOICES ARE DUE UPON PRESENTATION. invoice balances not paid within 30 days of invoice are subject to 1 -1/2% 18% annum interest/finance charge: Please reference the invoice number when sending payment. Federal Tax ID #41- 1520095 CORCORAN 2011 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL, Name: Dan Donahue Reviewer: Position: Administrator Review Date: Department: Administration Date,Due: November 10, 201t(Annual) Definitions: RATING: DESCRIPTION: Exceptional Performance and demonstrated behaviors consistently exceeds standard. Outcomes are clearly and consistently outstanding resulting in improvement or new methods, processes /systems or products. Above Standard Performance and demonstrated behaviors consistently meets and occasionally exceeds standard. Strong performance on critical objectives, outcomes are on high side of meeting expectations. Consistently Meets Standard Performance and demonstrated behaviors consistently meet standard. Performance is what is expected of a fully qualified individual. Outcomes meet expectations. Meets Minimum Standard Performance and demonstrated behaviors meet minimum standards. Guidance and sometimes instruction is needed to reach expected outcome. Individual may be in training phase or this rating indicates development may be needed to consistently meet standard. Below Standard Performance and demonstrated behaviors do not meet minimum standards. Excessive guidance and instruction is required to reach expected outcome. This standard needs immediate attention and improvement. OUR POLICY Our performance appraisal program is designed to provide a basis for better understanding between you and your manager, with respect to your job performance, potential and development within the organization. THIS DOCUMENT This document is intended to summarize discussions regarding job performance standards / objectives and personal goals that have been ongoing throughout the year. It is also to be used as a tool to help focus discussions and plan development for future objectives. Managers and employees are expected to review progress towards meeting planned goals and objectives throughout the year, as part of their normal and routine working relationship. Appraisal: Administrator, 2011 Male: Dan Donahue I. SPECIFIC JOB RESPONSIBILITY PERFORMANCE FACTORS ('These are the high level specific major activities of work, primary functions of the job) I. Management and communication with all X XX XX X employees and consultants to facilitate a productive .working relationship. Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Continents: Vexed somewhat by the ongoing challenges wi think Dan should reasonably be expected to manage her more effectively Work on improving employee relationships and productivity issues; recognize strengths; develop new skills in employees; work on consistent and positive listening communication skills; facilitate a positive environment.. This has been a consistent and building issue. The interpersonal relationships in the office are poor and Dan has little desire to get sufficiently involved. 2. Budget preparation & administration of XX XX X financial records. Capital Improvements Planning, investments and Purchasing. Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Comments: Budget projections do not meet the reality of budget needs; direction by council is not consistently followed in the budgeting process. Things are improving with a full -time clerk, but a higher level of personal scrutiny from the administrator would be highly desirable. 3. Funding Options — Manage idle monies, seek out X XXX XX grants and alternative. Negotiate contracts with outside service agencies. Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Comments: Follows the lead of others on grant opportunities; needs to do more research on opportunities. Dan writes a pretty good Youth Sports Grant. 4. Preparation and follow -up of City Council and X XXXX Commissions agendas - Educate about City services and activities. Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Comments: Generally good, but sometimes / get a sense that Dan hasn't inastered inaterials/inforination he gives us Appraisal: Administrator, 2011 Comments: Information is often unclear. 6. Represent the City in front of the general public, XX XX XXX Degree of technical competence in field; ability to Below news media and government agencies as a Consistently Above Exceptional apply that knowledge and stay abreast of new Standard Minimum positive image showing professionalism Meets Consistently Above Exceptional Standard Standard rovidin well defined information. Meets Standard Standard Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Comments: Information is often unclear. 6. Personnel Policy — Insurance XX X XXX Degree of technical competence in field; ability to Below 1Administer Benefits, Leaves, Em to meet Issues & Staffing. Consistently Above Exceptional apply that knowledge and stay abreast of new Standard Minimum B Meets Consistently Above Exceptional Standard Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Comments: Relies on the expertise of others Dan is not sufficiently attentive to some serious employee issues that currently exist. Ii. GENERAL PERFORMANCE FACTORS S Knowledge:_ XX XX X Degree of technical competence in field; ability to Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional apply that knowledge and stay abreast of new Standard Minimum Meets Standard developments, provides leadership and direction Standard Standard Comments: - - Demonstrated experience and knowledge at this level is minimal; Outside guidance is consistent; Does not demonstrate an understanding or knowledge of the Community needs or future. Generally current with new Iaws and practices from networking with others and reading. im Problem Solving and Creativity XX XX X Ability to define problems and develop workable Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional solutions and integrate into processes. Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Continents: Could be more of a risk taker — see ##12 Some initiative, but mainly in a response mode. Not likely to initiate proposals but competent to follow up. Planning & Organization: XX X X Ability to plan long and short -range objectives/ Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional priorities and develop effective work schedules Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Comments: - Long term does not seem to be a focus; Does not take lead roles in projects; needs consistent direction. Information to the Council is generally on time. Appraisal: Administrator, 2011 Flexibility & Ada tabil[ : )a XX X X Ability to respond to changing project Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional requirements and to meet changing Standard Minimum Meets Standard tecbnicai/business needs Standard Standard Comments: Relies on others Responds to Council requests - probably should push back a bit more on some issues. U Abili to Work Independently: )a X XX X Makes positive contributions with minimal Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional supervision Standard Minimum Meets Standard leadership and flexibility Standard Standard Comments: Is routine interaction with Mayor a partnership or a crutch? Needs direction and planning from the contracted Staff, Mayor, and other Council on a consistent basis. At this level, there is an expected leadership and anticipation of problems and proposed solutions and opportunities. My perception is that a lot of meat & potatoes gets delegated. M Ability to Work with Others: X X XX X Willingness to coordinate with others to meet Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional overall project objectives— demonstrates Standard Minimum Meets Standard leadership and flexibility Standard Standard Comments: I sense a need for better coordination with PD, regardless where the initiative comes from Does not consistently listen to office employees; needs to work on patience, skin recognition, and collaborative action plans with employees. ]Leaders inspire and encourage. Some ongoing personnel issues in administration -- too soon to judge — some inherited issues. M Meets Schedules: XX XXX X Ability to meet schedules Below Meets Consistently= Above Exceptional organization, its vision and its people; supports Standard Minimum Meets Standard organization policies and procedures. Standard Standard Name: M Comments: Required schedules are met. Su arts Organization and Vision: XX XX Ability to encourage others to take pride in the Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional organization, its vision and its people; supports Standard Minimum Meets Standard organization policies and procedures. Standard Standard Comments: Displays no personal investment Supports the organization - not much input on the vision. Appraisal: Administrator, 2011 15 Willing and able to learn from situations and 13elary Meets Consistently Above Exceptional people. Standard Minimum Meets Standard Exceptional creates growth opportunities. Standard Standard Standard Standard Comments: Comments: Application of "training" is not readily apparent Develops People X X XX Recognizes an individual's career goals and Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional creates growth opportunities. Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Comments: Results seemed mixed regarding different employees No evidence of working on career advancement and training of employees; Lack of communication. Dan will assign a new or additional job title, but not much mentoring to go with it. Finance area is shaping up — one of the better effort. III. TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 1. Please list courses, workshops, seminars and on- the -job training completed since the last review: - -I participate in a Senior Administrator's study group that meets bi- monthly for 3'/ hours. Buisness and management topics are discussed as well as is the assigned book on a relevant topic. -- Attended the state City Administrators Conference on May 4 -6, 2011 -- Attended the International City Manager Conference (ICMA) Conference in Milwaulkee, NVI on Sept. 18-21,2011 -- Scheduled to attend an Employee Harrassment Training session in November, 2011 -- Maintained my "Credentialed Manager" certification by ICMA by completing a minimum of 40 hours of yearly accredited training 2. Please note classroom training or education needed to perform job duties, or that will enhance the employee's ability to perform his or her job. Indicate what will be done to make it happen during the next year: 3. Please note on- the -job experience(s) needed to perform job duties, or that will help the employee to improve job performance. Indicate what efforts will be made toward gaining those experiences during the next year: 4. Mutual goals that the employee and supervisor are interested in accomplishing and plan(s) for accomplishing them and measuring performance (refer to the attached goals sheet it you wish): 5. Please comment on discussions about constraints or workplace limitations. Indicate any planned action: S. Other developmental plans: Appraisal: Administrator, 2011 Name: OVERALL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL This section is a summarization of the employee's overall performance since the last appraisal. Place an "X" on the performance continuum that reflects the level of overall performance based on the standards and the overall comments section. XX XX(X-) E�t Standards Meets Minimum Consistently Meets Above Standards Exceptional Standards Standards Comments: It seems to me that Dan has a good knowledge of the operation of city government and plans ahead to meet the requirements imposed by the state and county. Whenever I have asked him for or about anything he has always been very responsive and helpful and I have appreciated that. It would be good if a way could be found to improve his relations with staff, however. Dan clearly has a depth of experience and his knowledge base is an asset. Against that positive, he doesn't appear to be entirely on top of the management process and too often seems disconnected withboth the staff and information he is presenting to the Council. Some good performance, some performance not so good, on balance merely an average rating when we all want better. Areas needed for improvement are noted, Dan's just not really personally involved in the City's business. He does only what's required and not much more. He doesn't worry too much about how much money is spent where or how. He's not able to give status of various projects or events from memory. He's got an office morale problem that he's only superficially addressed. He's just kind of idling. Dan is functioning at a competent level in a maintenance mode, while repairing some systems and processes. Work is acceptable, but there is not a high level of energy for creative initiatives. Given Corcoran's historyand politics as well as the economic climate this is not a significant issue and may contribute to some needed stability. The dynamics of the City Council no doubt play a part in the degree of activism coming from Dan. The natural reaction is to revert to a more responsive and supportive mode rather than an initiating mode. TO BE COMPLETER BY THE EMPLOYEE You may wish to comment on the performance appraisal you have received. You may wish to use the space below or submit your comments to your manager and your personnel file. Comments: Appraiser and employee both need to sign and date the performance appraisal. Employee's signature does not necessarily mean agreement with all items; however it is an indication that this form has been shared with the employee. Please return the signed form to the City Administrator. Signature of Appraiser Date Appraisal: Administrator, 2011 Signature of Employee Date CORCORAN 2011 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Name: Sean Gormley Reviewer: Position: Director of Public Safety Review Date: Department: Police Date Due: 11 -10 -2011 Definitions: RATING: DESCRIPTION: Exceptional Performance and demonstrated behaviors consistently exceeds standard. Outcomes are clearly and consistently outstanding resulting in improvement or new methods, processes /systems or products. Above Standard Performance and demonstrated behaviors consistently meets and occasionally exceeds standard. Strong performance on critical objectives, outcomes are on high side of meeting expectations. Consis en ry—meets S an ar Per ormance an emonstrate ehaviors consistently meet -W standard. Performance is what is expected of a fully qualified individual. Outcomes meet expectations. Meets Minimum Standard Performance and demonstrated behaviors meet minimum standards. Guidance and sometimes instruction is needed to reach expected outcome. Individual may be in training phase or this rating indicates development may be needed to consistently meet standard. Below Standard Performance and demonstrated behaviors do not meet minimum standards. Excessive guidance and instruction is required to reach expected outcome. This standard needs immediate attention and improvement. OUR POLICY Our performance appraisal program is designed to provide a basis for better understanding between you and your manager, with respect to your job performance, potential and development within the organization. THIS DOCUMENT This document is intended to summarize discussions regarding job performance standards / objectives and personal goals that have been ongoing throughout the year. It is also to be used as a tool to help focus discussions and plan development for future objectives. Managers and employees are expected to review progress towards meeting planned goals and objectives throughout the year, as part of their normal and routine working relationship. Name: I. SPECIFIC JOB RESPONSIBILITY PERFORMANCE FACTORS {These are the high level specific major activities of work, primary functions of the job} I. Management and communication with all X KXX X employees and consultants to facilitate a productive workintr relationshin_ Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard comments.. It is my impression that Sean is very thoughtful and sensitive to the needs of his staff and has an excellent relationship with them. Demonstrates efficiency and effectiveness on multiple projects and daily operation. Sean would have scored higher here. 2. Budget preparation & administration of financial records. Capital Improvements Planning, Investments and Purchasing. X I X I XXx Below Meets Consistently Above Standard Minimum I Meets I Standard Comments: Responds to changing financial limits and meets annual budget consistently the dept tread and this is his budget. I wouldirke to see more of Sean details. 3. 1funding Options — Manage idle monies, seek out grants and alternative. Negotiate contracts with outside service ageacies. Exceptional =1101111WA.UIPPR is philosophy and X I XX I X Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptioi Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Comments: Pursues grant opportunities; business and citizen donations; neighboring community sharing; and works with outside services. 4. Preparation and follow -up of City Council and Commissions agendas - Educate about City X XX XX XX services and activities. XX p2andard =Belowkleets Below Standard Meets Minimum Above Standard Exceptional Standard Above Exceptional Standard MiuiCnwm 5. Represent the Ci£y in front of the general public, X XX news media and government agencies as a XX positive image snowing professionalism =Belowkleets _providing well defined information. Consistently Above Exceptional Standard MiuiCnwm Meets Standard Standard Standard %- VIntoenis: Clear, calm, professional, and positive 2 Meets Schedules: I I I XX X XX Ability to meet schedules Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional organization, its vision and its people; supports Standard Minimum Meets Standard o anization policies and procedures. Standard Standard ,Comments: Supports Organization and Vision: I I I X XX XX Ability to ermourage others to take pride in the Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional organization, its vision and its people; supports Standard Minimum Meets Standard o anization policies and procedures. Standard Standard Comments: Department demonstrates pride in the job and community; understands needs and the growing changes. Verbal & Written Communication: I I I X XXXX XX Ability to effectively communicate through verbal Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional interactions, reports, and memos, eft. Can Standard Minimum Mee #s Standard ..organize and run effective meetin s. Standard Standard Comments: Comm u.n..ifates clearly era —&- shi skill s : I I I X XX XX Behaviors demonstrate ability to effectively plan, Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional develop and implement overall organizational Standard Minimum Meets Standard objectives Standard Standard Comments: Consistently effective within the department and assists other office staff to accomplish goals Sean typically oMows his people quite a bit of autonomy in performing their ditties. In general I think this is rood —•I 11. Customer- Focus I I I X XX XX Dedicatioa .o exceeding expectations of customer's Below �leets Consistently Above Exceptional internal and external customers. Standard Minimum Meets Standard __. Standard Standard Comments: Every time l have had n conversation with Sean he has emphasized how important he feels it is to project a positive image of the department to the public and to earn their support and respect. Department mission statement is implemented which focuses on service internally and externally 12. Risk-Taling I I I XX XX Takes chanceF based on reasonable expectation of Below !6!ets Consistently Above Exceptional success. Standard Minimum Meets Standard __. I Standard Standard Cor±*mrrrty: Public Safety is not inherently an occupation where someone seeks out risk. From a personal level of risk taking there is E! ways risk when taking initiative and Sean seems to manage that well. 13. Broad, Encompassing Pers ective I XXX X Looks towarr! the broadest possible view and sees it Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional relationshiris and patterns. J Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Comments: 1.4.� Learning Ability X X XX XX Willing and able to learn from situations and Below Meets Consistently Above Exceptional people. Standard Minimum Meets Standard Standard Standard Standard 1. ommenis: Sean is very open to the thoughts and ideas of others. Seeks educational and training opportunities 15 Develops P, n le X XX XX Recognizes an individual's career goals and Below Rlects Consistently Above Exceptional creates growth opportunities. Standard Minlr.►r:r►► Meets Standard Standard Standard Comments: Uses the strengths of employees and provides opportunities for them to grow professionally Sean consciously makes an effort to develop and upgrade his officers. Career development normally is a useful tool in improving the performance and efficiency of the department. Sean is proposing the addition of a supervisor in 2012. This seem. � overly redundant, even superfluous. It makes me question the motivation. III. TRAININGIr AND DEVELOPMENT 1. Please list courses, workshops, seminars and on- the -job training completed since the last review: 2. Please note classroom training or education needed to perform job duties, or that will enhance the employee's ability to perform his or her job. Indicate what will be done to make it happen during the next year: 3. Please note on- the -job experience(s) needed to perform job duties, or that will help the employee to improve job performance. Indicate what efforts will be made toward gaining those experiences during the next year: 4. Muwai go' at ►at the employae and supervisor are interested in accomplishing and plan(s) for accomplishing thein and Rieasuring performance (refer to the attached goals sheet it you wish): 5. Please coutment on discussions about constraints or workplace tirnitations. Indicate any planned action: 6. Other devOoo►nental ptatts: Name: OVERALL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL This section is a summarization of the employee's overall performance since the last appraisal. Place an "X" on the performance continuum that reflects the level of overall performance based on the standards and the overall comments section. XXXX X Below Standards Meets Minimum Consistently Meets Above Standards Exceptional Standon I Standards Comments: Very satisfied with Sean's overall leadership, especially given challemges facing municipal government. Would like to see a bit mare management of or control at Council meetings, Not a serious issue, but one that should bear some attention. Sean is a very strong leader and has made solid improvements in the department. He is forced into a no- growth mode by the state of the economy and City finances. This requires creative scheduling and management of a larger part -time workforce. Overall the public safety department is in good. hands and the City Council can largely concentrate on other matters. This is a very positive situation for the City. The department enjoys great community support and respect. Sean is very thoughtful and conscientious and takes his responsibility as Public Safety Director very seriously. He bas a�reat co�nr rn %r surge protection and engages in eontirluing discussions with the four fire depar — looking for ways to waxilnize both near and long term services. He also is mindful that fostering community support for the PD is an important aspect of maximizing the department's effectiveness. In my opinion Sean is an asset to our community. I was on the connnittee that hired Sean as Corcoran "s Chief of Police in 2006( ?). I was extremely happy with him as our choice then as ]i am now. I like his non - intrusive supervisory style that allows his officers a fulfilling level of independence. His office management and organizational skills are top notch. His improvements to procedure and TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ]EMPLOYEE You may wish t5 comment on the performance appraisal you have received. You may wish to use the space below or submit your comments to your manager and your personnel file. Com mer ts: Appraiser and employee both need to sign and date the performance appraisal. Employee's signature does not necessarily mean agreement with all items; however it is an indication that this form has been shared with the employee. Please return the signed form to the City Administrator. Signature of Appraiser Signature of Employee Date Date