HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-06-23 - Council Agenda Packet - Part 4Agenda Item 6.c.
• s
L A N D F 0 R M
From Site to Finish • •
i
105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612 - 252 -9070
Suite 513 Fax: 612 - 252 -9077
Minneapolis, MN 55401 www.landform.net
TO: Corcoran City Council
FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform
DATE: June 13, 2011 for the June 23, 2011 City Council Meeting
RE: Conditional Use Permit for Living Quarters Accessory to a Principal Agricultural Use
on the Patnode Property at 23240 Country Road 50 (PID 19- 119 -23 -41 -0001)
City File No. 11 -004
60 -DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: July 9, 2011
Application Request
Brian and Christina Patnode are requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow a new
home on the existing farmstead. The conditional use permit is for living quarters accessory to a
principal agricultural use. The land is currently owned by James and Beverly Patnode.
The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to develop one new house on the property
(which has an existing home that would remain) and then subdivide the property into 2 parcels next
year when the land is removed from the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program.
2. Planning Commission Public Hearing
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item on June 2, 2011. The Planning
Commission voted 5 -0 -1 (Kohnen abstained) to recommend approval of the request.
At the public hearing, the Planning Commission received a letter from the landowners, Beverly and
Jim Patnode, in support of the request. The applicants were present to request approval and
answer questions.
In addition to the applicant, Tom Cossette spoke at the public hearing to question how the 1 per 40
density was calculated. Planner Lindahl noted that MN Statutes 473H.17, Subd. 2 allows
subdivision of land in Ag Preserve only if the minimum density restrictions of 1 per 40 are met and
the land continues to be used for agricultural uses. Planner Lindahl stated that the statutes do not
specify an exemption from these minimum standards, but she did contact MN Department of Ag,
Hennepin County and Metropolitan Council staff who are responsible for the Agricultural Preserve
implementation and all concurred that 1 per 40 acres is the minimum requirement and that the 78.84
acre parcel was not large enough for subdivision.
Chair Hank asked if the applicants could plat the property now and simply not record it until after it
came out of Ag Preserve. Staff noted that the City Attorney has indicated that we cannot accept an
application for this property because it is not eligible for subdivision until it comes out of Ag Preserve
(because it does not meet the density requirements). Furthermore, the City could not issue a
Landform", SensiblyGreen and Site to Finish"" are service marks of Landform Professional Services.
17
0
building permit on the lot until the plat was recorded because there is already a home on the existing
lot of record.
Chair Hank asked if the landowner had already submitted the documents to remove the property
from Ag Preserve. Staff noted that the removal paperwork was filed and it will be removed from Ag
Preserve in February 2012.
Chair Hank asked if the existing and proposed buildings would meet the minimum setbacks from the
new lot line. Both staff and the applicant confirmed that they would.
Chair Hank asked who would own the land after subdivision. The applicants (Brian and Christina
Patnode) indicated that they would own the 10 acre lot and the current landowners (Jim and Beverly
Patnode) would own the remaining portion of the land.
3. Context
Background
On January 27, 2011, the City Council approved a wetland delineation
and topographic survey waiver for part of this 78.84 -acre parcel.
Resolution 2011 -005 required a topographic survey and wetland
delineation for the areas where development is proposed for new home
and associated improvements as part of the future conditional use permit
application.
Zoning and Land Use
The property is zoned Rural Residential and is guided Rural /Ag Residential.
Surrounding Properties
The surrounding properties are all zoned Rural Residential and guided Rural /Ag Residential.
Natural Characteristics of the Site
The draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows wetland areas in the northern portion of the property.
No new development is proposed in those areas.
4. Analysis of Request
Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and
City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer's comments are incorporated
into this staff report.
Patnode Conditional Use Permit (11 -004)
June 23, 2011
•
A. Level of City Discretion in Decision - Making
•
•
The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the
proposed request meets the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the
City must approve the conditional use permit.
B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards
Agricultural Preserve Designation
It is the applicant's desire to create a new 10 -acre parcel from this 78.84 -acre piece and build a new
home this year, but the subdivision is not allowed because the land is enrolled in the Metropolitan
Agricultural Preserve Program. MN Statutes 473H.17, Subd. 2 allows subdivision of land in Ag
Preserve only if the density restrictions of 1 per 40 are met and the land continues to be used for
agricultural uses. Furthermore, the Restrictive Covenants that the landowner signed when entering
the Ag Preserve also references this 1 per 40 density requirement. In this case, the 78.84 acre
parcel is too small to meet the 1 per 40 density requirements.
MN Statutes 473H.04, Subd. 2 also states that "Land shall cease to be eligible for designation as an
agricultural preserve when the comprehensive plan and zoning for the land have been amended so
that the land is no longer planned for long -term agricultural use and is no longer zoned for long -term
agricultural use, evidenced by a maximum residential density permitting more than one unit per 40
acres. When changes have been made, the authority shall certify by resolution and appropriate
maps which lands are no longer eligible." This land will come out of Agriculture Preserve in
February 2012.
Conditional Use Permit
This property currently has a single family home surrounded by land that is being farmed. The
applicants are requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow a second home on the
property so that they can build the second home this year while the property is still in Ag Preserve.
The development rights map shows development rights remaining on the parcel and one would be
used to construct the new home.
The Rural Residential zoning district (Section 1040.030, Subd. 4(E)) allows living quarters accessory
to a principal agricultural use. This section has specific standards for approval and the following
conditions must be met:
1. The living quarters are not used as rental property.
The applicants would build the new home and would move from the existing home into the
new home. The existing home would not be used as a rental property but would be used by
another relative.
2. A maximum of one such accessory dwelling shall be allowed.
Patnode Conditional Use Permit (11 -004)
June 23, 2011
11
0
The new home would be the only accessory dwelling on site.
3. There is a demonstrated need for such a facility for the permitted agricultural use.
The applicant's narrative indicates that Brian and Christina Patnode actively participate in
daily and seasonal farm activities and they have chosen to live on this property to share in
the family farm work. However, they have indicated that the existing home does not
accommodate their growing family and would like to build the new home.
4. The farm includes a minimum of 30 acres.
The farm is 78.84- acres.
5. The structure complies with all other Zoning Ordinance requirements.
The new home would generally comply with all other zoning ordinance requirements. Staff
has reviewed the plans against the Zoning Ordinance standards, including the general
conditional use permit standards in Section 1070.
If the City finds that these conditions are met, the City should approve the conditional use permit for
a second home on the property and find that since the home is accessory to the principal farm
house, the new home is not in conflict with the Agriculture Preserve statutes.
Plat
When the land comes out of the Ag Preserve program early next year, the applicant would apply for
a subdivision to create a separate 10 -acre parcel for the new home. Staff believes that, while the
applicants may be part of the family farm activities, the request is more to allow construction of the
new home prior to subdivision than a true accessory use. Therefore, we recommend that as part of
the Conditional Use Permit approval, the City include a condition requiring the land owner submit a
plat application to subdivide the new home off from the farm (as discussed in their application) within
1 year of the Conditional Use Permit approval.
Access
The new home would gain access from an existing driveway onto County Road 50. Hennepin
County has reviewed this proposed access and has no concerns. However, the Loretto Fire Chief
did express concern about the sharp curves in the driveway. The Fire Chief met with the applicant
on site and together they agreed to modify the driveway alignment to ensure public safety vehicles
could access the new house. We have included this as a condition of approval.
Wetlands
A wetland delineation was completed in the area where the new home and associated
improvements are planned. The wetland delineation was submitted to Elm Creek Watershed
Management Commission ( ECWMC) for review and approval. The ECWMC approved the
delineation on May 31, 2011.
Patnode Conditional Use Permit (11 -004)
June 23, 2011
r
i
0
The Corcoran Natural Resources Communities Quality Ranking Map shows this as a low quality
wetland. Section 1050.010 of the zoning ordinance requires an average wetland buffer of 15 feet
(10 -foot min /20 -foot max.) and a structure setback of 15 feet from the buffer. These buffers are
required to be installed when the property is platted, but staff reviewed the plans to ensure
compliance with these requirements. It appears that these standards will be met. Staff has included
a condition that the wetland buffer /setback be shown on the plans when the plat is submitted and the
wetland buffer monuments be installed at that time.
Section 1050.010, Subd. 4 requires a 75 -foot setback from the wetland for septic and soil
absorbsion systems. It does not appear that these standards have been met. The plans must be
revised to meet this setback requirement and dimension this setback on the plans.
Septic and Well
Hennepin County must approve the septic plans and a copy of these approvals must be submitted to
the city prior to issuance of a building permit.
A preliminary well location is shown on the plans.
5. Conclusion
Staff finds that the CUP standards have been met. Staff makes no findings relative to the legal
covenants that the landowner entered into when placing this land in Agriculture Preserve nor the
impact that the new home may have on the Agriculture Preserve status.
However, the City Council could find that the CUP is being requested primarily as a means to allow
construction of a new home prior to removal of the property from Agricultural Preserve and that the
standards have not been met. If the City Council finds that the standards have not been met, they
should deny the request and provide findings for their recommendation.
6. Recommendation
Move to adopt the attached resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit, as recommended by
the Planning Commission.
Approval of the resolution requires a 3/5 vote of the City Council.
Attachments
a. Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit
b. Site Location Map
c. Letter from Loretto Fire Chief dated April 28, 2011
d. Applicant's Narrative dated April 14, 2011
e. Letter from Landowners dated May 30, 2011
f. Notice of Decision form ECWMC dated May 31, 2011
g. Preliminary plan graphics dated April 14, 2011
Patnode Conditional Use Permit (11 -004)
June 23, 2011
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -26
Motion By:
Seconded By:
June 23, 2011
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BRIAN AND CHRISTINA
PATNODE ON PROPERTY OWNED BY JAMES AND BEVERLY PATNODE AT 23240
COUNTY ROAD 50 (PID 19- 119 -23 -41 -0001)
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval of a conditional use permit for living quarters
accessory to a principal agricultural use for property legally described as follows:
East half of the southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin
County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the conditional use permit at a duly called
Public Hearing and recommends approval, and;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a
conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1. A conditional use permit is approved to allow living quarters accessory to a principal
agricultural use at 23240 County Road 50, in accordance with the application received by
the City on April 14, 2011 and revisions received on May 10, 2011, except as amended by
this resolution.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant /landowner must:
a. Record the approving resolution at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to
the City.
b. The plans must be revised to show the required 75 -foot setback for the septic system.
c. The applicant shall obtain septic approval from Hennepin County and provide a copy of
the approval to the City.
d. The applicant shall review the plans to straighten the driveway to eliminate the sharp
curves in the driveway as recommended by the Fire Chief.
e. Electronic files of the plans shall be submitted to the City in AutoCAD format.
3. Silt fence must be installed to protect the wetland prior to beginning construction.
4. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant
commences the authorized use and completes the required improvements.
5. The applicant must submit a plat application to the City of Corcoran to create a separate lot
for the new home within one year of the date of approval of the conditional use permit.
Page 1 of 2
City of Corcoran
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -26
June 23, 2011
a. As a condition of the plat approval, wetland buffers and setbacks shall be
required on the lot with the new home in accordance with Section 1050.010 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
b. As a condition of the plat approval, wetland buffer monuments shall be installed
on the lot with the new home in accordance with Section 1050.010 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
c. All new and existing structures must comply with setback requirements from the
new lot lines.
d. The plat must comply with all ordinance requirements.
VOTING AYE
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Asleson, Rich
❑ Cossette, Tom
❑ Gmach, George
❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn
VOTING NAY
❑ Guenthner, Ken
❑ Asleson, Rich
❑ Cossette, Tom
❑ Gmach, George
❑ Milbrandt, Rosalyn
Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of June 2011.
ATTEST:
Jeanie Heinecke — Clerk
Kenneth Guenthner - Mayor
Page 2 of 2
City Seal
YF
ti a.
April 28th, 2011
Kendra Lindahl
Landform
800 C Butler Square
100 North 6th Street
Mpls., MN 55403
Kendra,
i met with the applicant (Brian Patnode) on Monday April 25`h, 2011 to discuss my concerns
about the proposed driveway to the residents. My concern was the two sharp curves in the driveway
located just off County Road 50 as being able to get fire apparatus to the residents in case of an
emergency. The applicant agreed to change the proposed driveway plan to the plan that l have
submitted with this letter. Please let me know if you have any question.
Sincerely,
44W
Jeff Leuer
Loretto Fire Chief
612 - 221 -4963
Loretto Volunteer Fire Department • P.O. Box 22 ® 259 N. Medina St ® Loretto, Mfg 55357 -763- 479-3036
AP ,, �L 2S t tot i
f
`� i f 31.— fMrlk+p Noum
HCSAH No 50, Plat TO -
-County Road rises �e� rnae5
r�.
�C}
z�oot„
PROPOYn
The fast
Township
e denotes iron manoment found
C e r t iffc a t e o f Sur v e y O n
Requested By: ,
! here rtir that thfa a urvs
., O6 Y Y
p1on, or report was prepared by me
denotes iroh pipe set orro,r�sw
f h e East H a t f a f the
� � e
Brun and Christina Patnode
or under my direct supervision and
thatI am
5
Southeast quarter Of
roro—
Section 79, Township
QQf
staota�
/
.eats:
Drawn 0y:
Ohl
Checked By:
le
119. Range 23,
G denotes percolation test hole
H e n n e p in G a u n t y,
Minnesota
11181201,E
RE .0.
fI
P.E.O.
I f
I
f I�
# 40x62
Errgrn
1f
f
`� i f 31.— fMrlk+p Noum
HCSAH No 50, Plat TO -
-County Road rises �e� rnae5
r�.
�C}
z�oot„
PROPOYn
The fast
Township
e denotes iron manoment found
C e r t iffc a t e o f Sur v e y O n
Requested By: ,
! here rtir that thfa a urvs
., O6 Y Y
p1on, or report was prepared by me
denotes iroh pipe set orro,r�sw
f h e East H a t f a f the
� � e
Brun and Christina Patnode
or under my direct supervision and
thatI am
and maned a8 shown: arrwaraz
Southeast quarter Of
Surveyor under tt
r he lawaeor the
Section 79, Township
staota�
.eats:
Drawn 0y:
Scole:
Checked By:
� denotes soil borkng
119. Range 23,
G denotes percolation test hole
H e n n e p in G a u n t y,
Minnesota
11181201,E
RE .0.
1 n =100'
P.E.O.
Paul
# 40x62
Errgrn
March 1, 2011
Conditional Use Permit Application
To: City of Corcoran Planning Commission
From: Brian and Christina Patnode
Re: Written narrative describing the proposal (Section 1070.020 Subd. 2,A)
a) Nature of request:
Our desire is to create a new 10 -acre parcel from the 78.84 -acre piece of land at 23240
County Road 50 to construct a new home this year. Subdivision is not allowed because the
land is currently enrolled in the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve Program. MN Statutes
473H.17, Subd. 2, allows subdivision of land in Ag Preserve only if the density restrictions
of 1 per 40 are met and the land continues to be used for agricultural uses. In this case, the
78.84 acre parcel is too small to meet the 1 per 40 density requirements as there is currently
a single family home on it, surrounded by land that is being farmed. In preparation for our
application of the conditional use permit (CUP,) we pursued and were granted a topography
exemption and wetland delineation exemption for the entire 78.84 acre piece of property at
the City Council meeting on January 27, 2011. Per City recommendation, wetland
delineation for the 10 -acre parcel could be provided when the property is platted (2012) to
include wetland buffers and setbacks, but required topography and wetland delineation for
the area development is proposed as part of the CUP application process. We are now
proceeding with an application for the CUP to allow a second home as allowed by Section
1040.030, Subd. 4(E) which allows living quarters accessory to a principal agricultural use.
This section has specific standards for approval and conditions that must be met. In this
narrative, we will prove we meet these conditions and ask the Honorable Mayor and Council
members to approve our CUP application, finding that the home is accessory to the principal
farm house, so the new home is not in conflict with the statutes.
The conditions are as follows:
1. The living quarters are not used as rental property
2. A maximum of one such accessory dwelling shall be allowed.
3. There is a demonstrated need for such a facility for the permitted agricultural
use.
4. The farm includes a minimum of 30 acres.
5. The structure complies with all other Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Regarding conditions 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the Section, we propose construction of only one
accessory dwelling that will not be used as rental property, on this farm that is well in excess
of the 30 acre minimum. We will not be in contradiction with zoning ordinance
requirements, as construction will be for only one, single- family home on this property
zoned as Rural Residential.
Regarding condition 3 of the Section, Patnode Farms is a 5- generation, family -run farm of
which we are active contributors to its current operations, and will continue this in the
future. While some of our activities /contributions would not necessitate us living on the
farm, (ie: spring/fall field work, routine maintenance, etc... ) there are many dairy- related
needs that do require we be immediately available and/or onsite, as we presently are. With
some family - members absent as they pursue further education, we have become more
involved with the milking and calving activities. At times, being in charge of activities for
days, where being on the farm is essential to milk and feed cows, perform calving checks
nD
and assist cows if necessary, and deal with frozen pipes /waterers, or other emergency
situations. Additionally, unexpected maintenance issues surrounding milking equipment,
(pumps, vacuums, bulk tank coolers, etc...) need immediate attention and Brian needs to be
readily on -hand to fix or help fix these problems that might otherwise interrupt the milking .
schedule or cause loss of product. We also monitor cattle on pasture on this parcel which
has prevented their potential escape a few times in the past, and when escape has happened
on occasion, we assist in rounding up the cattle and getting them confined again.
Furthermore, a new artificial insemination program is being instituted, of which Christina is
certified in AI and will help in leading heat checks and breeding of cows. Virtually all of
the afore- mentioned responsibilities we have to the operation would be impossible, or near -
impossible on our part, if we were not living on the farm.
We would like the council members to know we wish to build in 2011, rather than wait until
2012 when the land comes out of Ag Preserve, because with the arrival of our daughter, we
have simply outgrown the 500 sq ft house we currently reside in_ If we wait until 2012, it
could be another 18 months before we could get into a larger house. Spring 2011
construction allows this time to be drastically shortened. Whether we build in 2011 or 2012,
we will still be building on the proposed site on the farm, as our involvement in the farm
operations is our primary driver for the location chosen. Additionally, we would like to
explain that Brian's parents are the current landowners and they are allowing us to build the
new home on their property. After the land comes out of Ag Preserve, we will subdivide 10
acres off and will complete the ownership transfer and associated paperwork.
b) Impact on adjoining properties and mitigating measures to minimize impact:
We have enclosed an aerial photo of the proposed building site and believe that our home
will not have negative impacts on adjoining properties, as they are farm fields and /or
wooded pasture areas. Furthermore, we have carefully chosen the house location to
minimize loss of cropland acreage from Patnode Farms, and will utilize the current field
path as the new driveway. These efforts have been made to impact farm operations and
cropland as little as possible.
C) Buildings to be constructed or utilized — please see a) above.
d) Intended use of buildings and property — please see a) above.
e) Hours and days of operation — not applicable.
f) Number of employees — not applicable.
g) Size of operation, including number of animals, if applicable — not applicable.
h) Impact on traffic, including type and amount of traffic, access, and parking provisions — not
applicable
i) Impact on septic system and well:
A new septic system and well will be installed as part of the home construction activities.
j) Potential environmental impacts and measures to avoid or minimize the potential impacts:
We do not believe construction of our home will have negative environmental impacts. The
delineation report shows adequate distance of proposed improvement sites from wetland
areas. Additionally, the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows wetland areas in the northern
portion of the near 80 -acre property, and no new development is proposed in that area.
k) Proposed measures to provide buffering from proposed use to adjacent properties:
Please see aerial photo for adjacent properties, which are farm fields and/or wooded pasture
areas. We believe construction of our home will not have negative affects on adjacent
properties, so no buffering measures are planned at this time.
1) Future expansion plans — not applicable.
m) Nature of other uses in the neighborhood — not applicable.
C',
Ltr
Minnesota Wetland Conservatio
Notice of Decision
aming mail
06.02.11 10:59
Local Government Unit (LGU) Address
Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission 3235 Fernbrook Lane, Plymouth, MN
55447
1 PROJFCT INFORMATION
Applicant Name
Project Name
Date of
Application
Brian and Christina Patnode
Patnode Home Site
Application
Number
5/16/11
2011 -012w
® Attach site locator map.
Type of Decision:
® Wetland Boundary or Type . ❑ No -Loss ® Exemption ❑ Sequencing
❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan
Technical Evaluation Panel
❑ Approve
Summary (or attach):
and Recommendation (it any,
❑ Approve with conditions
2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION
❑ Deny
Date of Decision: 5/31/11
® Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (include below) ❑ Denied
LGU Findine's and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary):
Delineation Report for the Patnode Site by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, dated May 9,
2011. That part of the westerly 10 acres of Hennepin County PID # 1911923410001 as identified in said
report.
PaaP 1 of i
For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank:
Bank Account #
Bank Service Area
County
Credits Approved for
Name
Title
James C. K
Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest .01
Signatu,
Date
Phone Number and E -mail
acre)
Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the
approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following:
❑ Financial Assurance: For project - specific replacement that is not in- advance, a financial
assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule
8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings).
❑ Deed Recording: For project - specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that
the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland"
forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located.
❑ Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that
BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved
replacement plan.
Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met!
LGU Authorized Signature:
Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255,
Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as
specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and
are available from the LGU upon request.
Name
Title
James C. K
Advisor to the Commission
Signatu,
Date
Phone Number and E -mail
5131111
612 - 348 -7338
James.ku j awa @co. hennepin.m n. us
THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all
appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands.
Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period
for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be
responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts.
This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the
TEP and specified in this notice of decision.
3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION
Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a
petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of
this Notice to the following as indicated:
Check one:
® Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ❑ Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send
petition and $0 fee (if applicable) to: petition and $500 filing fee to:
Elm Creek WMC c/o JASS Executive Director
Attn: James Kujawa Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources
3235 Fernbrook Lane 520 Lafayette Road North
Plymouth, MN 55447 St. Paul, MN 55155
BWSR Forms 7-1 -1 n PRCp ? of ;
4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES
® SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski, HCD, 417 N. 5th St.,Suite 200, Minneapolis, MM 55401
® BWSR TEP member: Lynda Peterson, BWSR, 520 Lafayette Rd. N., St. Paul, MN 55155
❑ LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact):
❑ DNR TEP member:
® DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member)
❑ WD or WMO (if applicable):
® Applicant and Landowner (if different)Brian & Christina Patnode 23240 Co. Rd. 50, Corcoran,
Mn 55340
® Members of the public who requested notice: City of Corcoran
® Corps of Engineers Project Manager Dept of Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. ATTN:
CO -R, Project Manager Melissa Jenny, 180 5tb St. East, Ste 700, St. Paul, MN 55101 -1638
❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan decisions only)
5. MAILING INFORMATION
➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA areas.pdf
➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf
t f N ura
t 1 Resources Re ional Offices:
Departmen o a
NW Region:
NE Region:
Central Region:
Southern Region:
Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol.
Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol.
Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol.
Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol.
Div. Ecol. Resources
Div. Ecol. Resources
Div. Ecol. Resources
Div. Ecol. Resources
2115 Birchmont Beach Rd.
1201 E. Hwy. 2
1200 Warner Road
261 Hwy. 15 South
NE
Grand Rapids, MN 55744
St. Paul, MN 55106
New Ulm, MN 56073
Bemidji, MN 56601
For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http•/ /files dnr state minus /aboutdnvonr regions.pdf
➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www mvp usace army mil /re ue latoD /default.asp ?pageid =687
or send to:
US Army Corps of Engineers
St. Paul District, ATTN: OP -R
180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700
St. Paul, MN 55101 -1678
For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to:
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources
Wetland Bank Coordinator
520 Lafayette Road North
St. Paul, MN 55155
6. ATTACHMENTS
In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments:
® 81/2x11 Site & Grading Plan by Otto & Associates dated 3/28/11, revised 5/11/11
D--- 1 -F'!
Note: Site boundaries on this figure are
approximate and do not constitute an
official survey product.
By S5
W�
rK
10
55
General Site
Location
ti Ji�
, 0
Figure 1— Site Location Map
Patnode Site (KES No. 2011-006)
Corcoran, Minnesota
KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY +N No Scale
T � \
h
o \
I
o °a �
i I
Jr
\ _ —
- -�— ,-10110 — =' \\7x l I 1 I
1 1
25
I � \
I II
II
II
I I
I 1
II
I of
I °I
I �I
ICI
I�
10
� wl
SITE &
GRADING
PLAN
A N
PROPOSED f ADOHS
- FLOOR = 1O3SO
LOIY FLOOR 1016.0
GARAG£ FLOOR = 1OT4.67
lI
I
i
re,oCQ11011
I I
Sed
I
prop°
1 I
1 I
II
we u°naa ae Hn°°fde ey X)°rhee9
En vlronm entef 5erv1ces Company
� \ Existing
_
Shed
I I
I I
I I
Existing House
1 I
•
vxrwmrr DbsEmm�ar
me E HmF o/ the s°xthmsa or sdrBdn t9,
1 nsv 119, Roge 23 Henm C. uY. Al /nnc°°fd.
County
I Road
50
• denotes iron monumen' lountl
o d otes a set
and en marked pipe shown:
Sill Ild Lra In P
fhe Eesf Ho l/ ( elen
a
Reeurt.d BY
Brian &Christina Patnode
ne,eb e ry gvt u.. ew..v.
ena
v �a Q e°°eu elm ° ue
Ael Means vi�i.�i'..eer ud
rnnvoGOassoceres.¢
- m
9WSSf Omswn Snc:t
BulPelo, e'N SS3f3
Revved:
rur
fhe Soutn eaaf °drtar
°/ Section 19, io xnsh fp
s
TT O—
r OGrJ66P4 «r
L •
Dole:
3/28/99
Dra.n By:
M.L.N.
dln
�9 " =40'
ecMed By.
LP.E.O.
1 -11 -0002
B denotes soil poring
0 denotes percolation test hole
13,
Henn, ln�ese�onfy,
A
Fu: (163�d3
SSOCIATES
°°;�,`r.; -r/
�.r ,,,aa
En9� "crs SLand Suneycs, lnc
Hennepin County Property Map Print
Page 1 of 1
Hennepin County Property Map - Tax Year: 2010
The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed
land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only.
Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives.
k T
- r
"
i•
pr
AI
f
y� .0 ... 4
1
�I
{
�(.,t) FBI).N,U.Dta -- --
Selected Parcel Data Date Printed: 1/17/2011 12:04:35 PM
Parcel ID: 19- 119 -23 -41 -0001 Current Parcel Date: 1/6/2011
Owner Name: 3 E PATNODE & B 3 PATNODE TR
Parcel Address: 23240 CO RD NO 50 , CORCORAN , MN 55340
Property Type: AG PRESERVE
Homestead: HOMESTEAD
Area (sgft): 3434411
Area (acres): 78.84
A -T -B: ABSTRACT
Market Total: $398,900.00
Tax Total: $2,389.74
Sale Price: $0.00
Sale Date: /
Sale Code:
http: / /gis.co. hennepin. mn .us /HCPropertyMap/Locator.aspx 1/17/2011
N
Total Arco = 7984 Acres
Area fens RIW 78.84 acres
Certificate of Survey
11
iz....,...�
f:o
aunty Man °meet eat
sf fhe E t 119, 19. 1
Se
p. 9, T. R. YS
Caun ty Nerrument
M
,ty Naaament of the
S — of the C-t 112 of fhe
sr 174 at Sec 19 7 t19, A 25
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
The East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 19,
Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnosoto.
O denotes iron monument found 1 hereby certify that this survey, Revised:
Certificate of Survey on a plan, ar report wss prepared by me wwmattoasscdafas MM
denotes iron pipe set �Oif0.199�� fhe East Half of the Bean and Christina 'atnode th under my direct supervL nnC
and marked as shown- 1�' /f that I om a duly licensed i.and
o, Southeast Quarter a r f e r o f Su veyor under the laws of the O 9 ffaio, N56 Street
Section 19, To w n s h ip state Alfnnesota. Bufiafa, MN 55313
1 1 9, Range 2 3, Ilcte: Brawn By: Scsle� Checked B (763X62 -4727
A denotes soil boring g r Fax: (763)662-3522
Job nla.
O denotes percolation test hole Hennepin County, a,,,, r SSDCIATES
p Minnesota 1/18/2011 P.E.O. 1 —100 P,E.O. paai�.Otto _ 1- 1] -QDD2
Octe:� License # 40082 Engineers d Land Surveyors, W,