Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-02-13 City Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda February 13, 2025 7:00 pm a.NAL 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Presentations a.Jessica Christensen Buck – MRPA Award – Longevity Award b.Steve Warren - Retirement 5.Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6.Consent Agenda a.Approval of Minutes b.Financial Claims c.Revision to Recorded Resolution 2024-92 for Hope Meadows d.Notice of Decision for Corcoran Industrial NE Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) e.Water Tower Change Order 3 f. Water Treatment Plant Change Order 9 g. Stieg Road Improvements Pay Request 7 h. Water Treatment Plant Pay Request 21 i.Horeshoe Bend Drainage Improvements – Restoration Modifications Pay Request j . Water Treatment Plant – 10200 County Road 116 Culvert Replacement Pay Request k.Proposal for Water Treatment Plant – Process Safety Management Plan l.Water Tower – Xcel Energy Pay Request m.Bass Lake Crossing 1st & 2nd Addition n.CIP Pre Orders o.Resolution 2025-13 Recognizing Steve Warren Retirement 7.Planning a.Public Hearing – Easement Vacation for Rush Creek Reserve Wetland b.Park Financing Discussion c.60% Design – City Park 8.Unfinished Business 9.New Business a.Public Hearing – Bonding CIP and Land Acquisition 10.Closed Session a.REVISED Potential Land Acquisition 11.Staff Reports a.Class and Compensation Update b.Sign Ordinance Update c.Goal setting and Strategic Planning Update 12.Council Reports 13.2025 City Council Schedule 14.Adjournment HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Council meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 878 8508 9563 Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87885089563 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 878 8508 9563 *Please note in-person comments will be taken at the scheduled meeting where noted. Comments received via email to City Administrator Tobin at jtobin@corcoranmn.gov or via public comment cards will also be accepted. All email and public comment cards must be received by the Wednesday prior to scheduled Council meeting. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov * City of Corcoran City Council Minutes January 23, 2025, 7pm 1 The Corcoran City Council met on January 23, 2025, in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City Council meeting was held in person and the public was present in person and remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee, Councilors Friedrich and Vehrenkamp were present. Nichols was excused. Lanterman arrived at 7:05 pm Assistant City Administrator Williams, City Clerk Johnson, City Attorney Thames, Community Development Director Davis-McKeown, Planner Klingbeil, and Public Works Director Mattson were present. INAL 1. Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor McKee called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. 2. Pledge of Allegiance Mayor McKee invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Agenda Approval Mayor McKee stated there were changes to the agenda – Item 6c added, 6k modified and 11a- closed session was removed. MOTION: made by Vehrenkamp, seconded by Friedrich to approve the agenda as amended. Voting Aye: McKee, Vehrenkamp and Friedrich. (Motion carries: 3:0) 4. No Presentations 5. Open Forum - Public Comment Opportunity Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person during Open Forum for items not included on the agenda. Mayor McKee explained the instructions to participate in the public comment opportunity. • Melissa Solberg, 27115 Paragon Drive, Rogers addressed the Council concerning her property in Corcoran and her land use application. • James Scherber, 22624 County Road 10, Rogers, addressed the Council in support of Melissa Solberg application. • Quincy Schmidt, 22622 County Road 10, Rogers addressed the Council in support of Melissa Solberg application. • Dean Vehrenkamp, 9310 Bechtold Road, addressed the Council. 6. Consent Agenda a. City Council Meeting Minutes Approval Action – Approved January 9, 2025 City Council Minutes. b. Financial Claims Action – Approved Financial Claims for January 23, 2025. c. Amendment to Resolution 2025-01 Personnel Committee Appointments Action – Amended Resolution 2025-01 Personnel Committee Appointments d. Resolution 2025-07 Appointments of Vacant Positions Action – Adopted Resolution 2025-07 Appointments of Vacant Positions. e. Outsourcing Newsletter Printing Action – Approved Outsourcing Newsletter Printing. f. Rules of Decorum Action – Pulled by Lanterman for discussion. Approved with revisions. City of Corcoran City Council Minutes January 23, 2025, 7pm 2 g. Resolution 2025-09 Utility Billing Operations Action – Adopted Resolution 2025-09 Utility Billing Operations h. Bechtold Farms Letter of Credit Request No action necessary. Information Only i. Resolution 2025-08 Acting Mayor Action – Adopted Resolution 2025-08 Appointing Jeremy Nichols as Acting Mayor for 2025. j. Address Change Update No action necessary – Information only. k. Compensation and Classification Study Action – Pulled by Friedrich for discussion. Adopted the Classification and Compensation Study completed by Abdo and approved the Reclassification Guidelines and process. MOTION: made by Vehrenkamp, seconded by Lanterman to approve consent agenda items 6a-6e, and 6g-6j. Voting Aye: McKee, Friedrich, Lanterman, and Vehrenkamp. (Motion carries: 4:0) MOTION: made by Lanterman, seconded by Vehrenkamp to approve consent agenda item 6k. Voting Aye: McKee, Friedrich, Lanterman, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carries 4:0) MOTION: made by McKee, seconded by Lanterman to change the language in item 6f Rules of Decorum under General Rules, paragraph three to read “Should a member or members of the audience be identified as disorderly which disturbs the Council’s ability to conduct business, the Mayor or Chairperson has the right to declare the meeting temporarily recessed and call for the removal of said person (s) from the premises. The City Council or Commission may by vote to reinstate an individual who has been removed”. MOTION: made by Lanterman, seconded by Vehrenkamp to approve item 6f as amended. Voting Aye: McKee, Friedrich, Lanterman, and Vehrenkamp. (Motion carries 4:0) 7. Planning Public Comment Opportunity was taken on Items • Jason Bartels, 19795 Hunters Ridge addressed the Council against item 7b Lother Subdivision Concept a. A&A Landscape Concept Community Development Director Davis-McKeown gave a presentation. City Council was asked to provide feedback. • Dan Kreps, representing A&A Landscaping, addressed the council. • Aaron Ottman, Rogers Tree Service, addressed the council on behalf of the applicant. • Brad Ottman, Little Falls, MN spoke on behalf of the applicant. Council provided feedback and the consensus was not in support of proposed project b. Lother Subdivision Concept Planner Dwight Klingbeil gave a presentation and the Council provided feedback and made recommendations to the applicant for future application.The Council discussed options for next steps. Consultant, John McKinney addressed the Council on behalf of the applicant. 8. Unfinished Business a. Downtown Water and Sewer Staff identified two properties that still require to connect to municipal water and sewer, 7525 Commerce Street and 7590 Commerce Street. City of Corcoran City Council Minutes January 23, 2025, 7pm 3 MOTION: made by Vehrenkamp, seconded by Lanterman to proceed with option 1 to direct staff to work with the City Attorney to evaluate and pursue enforcement enforcement options for both properties. Voting Aye: McKee, Friedrich, Lanterman, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carries 4:0) b. Phil’s Auto Code Compliance • Phil Kerber, Owner, 7590 Commerce Street, addressed the Council and answered their questions MOTION: made by Friedrich, seconded by McKee to affirm previous extension with formal compliance agreement with removal of the condition regarding utilization of the parking expansion area. Voting Aye: McKee, Friedrich, Lanterman and Vehrenkamp (Motion carries 4:0) 9. No New Business 10. No Council Reports 11. City Council Schedule Strategic Work Session scheduled for January 27th to be rescheduled. Date to be determined. 12. Closed Session Removed 13. Adjournment MOTION: made by McKee, seconded by Vehrenkamp to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Friedrich, Lanterman, and Vehrenkamp. (Motion carries 4:0) Mayor McKee adjourned the meeting at 9:38 p.m. January 23, 2025 Respectfully submitted, _____________________________________ Karen Heiden – Deputy Clerk STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6b Council Meeting February 13, 2025 Prepared By Reed Kottke Topic Financial Claims to February 13, 2025 Action Required Review and Approval Summary Claims require Council review and approval, those permitted per policy have been completed, while others are pending for Council approval. Financial/Budget Claims are within budget or are identified on a case-by-case basis to confirm funding source and seek Council approvals as necessary. Options 1. Approve claims as presented. 2. Amend and approve claims. Recommendation Approve claims as presented. Council Action Consider approving claims as presented. Attachments 1.Claims approved and processed per policy 2. Claims pending Council approval Check Range: 36446-36480 Financial Claims 01/23/2025 80,261.60$ -$ 80,261.60$ Check Register (See register for financial claims) Automatic Deduction (EFT) Total Expenditures For Approval Agenda Item: 6b 1 Council Meeting: 02/13/2025 CLAIMS APPROVED AND PROCESSED PER POLICY Prepared By: Reed Kottke, Accountant Check Range: 36579-36626* Financial Claims 02/06/2025 143,734.08$ -$ 143,734.08$ *check range 36481-36578 void *print error Check Register (See register for financial claims) Automatic Deduction (EFT) Total Expenditures For Approval Agenda Item: 6b 2 Council Meeting: 02/13/2025 CLAIMS APPROVED AND PROCESSED PER POLICY Prepared By: Reed Kottke, Accountant Check Range: 36627-36640 Financial Claims 02/13/2025 2,651,588.88$ 264,110.22$ 2,915,699.10$ Date Vendor Amount Description 1/16/2025 POSTALIA POSTAGE 200.00$ Mail meter postage 1/17/2025 MEDSURETY 62.39$ January 2025 COBRA remittance 1/17/2025 ADP PAYROLL FEES 392.29$ PP1 Processing fee 1/21/2025 MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 225.44$ December 2024 fuel tax return 1/21/2025 REPUBLIC SERVICES 112.99$ January 2025 wildflower park refuse 1/21/2025 REPUBLIC SERVICES 163.59$ December 2024 public works refuse 1/21/2025 REPUBLIC SERVICES 655.38$ January 2025 city park refuse 1/21/2025 REPUBLIC SERVICES 1,137.08$ December 2024 city hall refuse 1/21/2025 COMCAST CABLE 259.46$ December 2024 / January 2025 public works phone services 1/21/2025 COMCAST CABLE 598.95$ December 2024 / January 2025 public works internet 1/21/2025 COMCAST CABLE 1,087.70$ December 2024 / January 2025 city hall / police internet 1/23/2025 ADP NET PAY 109,457.38$ PP2 Net wages payable 1/23/2025 ADP TAX WITHHOLDING 37,866.71$ PP2 State/federal tax withholding 1/24/2025 ADP PAYROLL FEES 906.00$ Prior quarter amendment processing fee 1/27/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF MN 31,540.67$ PP2 Biweekly employee pension contributions 1/28/2025 CIGNA HEALTH 621.58$ January 2025 ancillary health insurance premiums 1/28/2025 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2,983.70$ PP2 Biweekly deferred compensation 457/roth contributions 1/28/2025 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 4,159.16$ PP2 Biweekly HCSP contributions 1/28/2025 OPTUM FINANCIAL 5,812.19$ PP2 Biweekly HSA contributions 1/29/2025 THE HARTFORD 2,300.52$ January 2025 disability insurance premiums 1/29/2025 POSTALIA POSTAGE 100.00$ Mail meter postage 1/30/2025 FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL 25.00$ Stop payment fee 1/31/2025 ADP PAYROLL FEES 416.61$ PP2 Processing fee 2/3/2025 OPTUM CLAIM 384.62$ FSA reimbursement 2/3/2025 HEALTHPARTNERS 58,228.48$ February 2025 health insurance premiums 2/3/2025 METLIFE 2,101.68$ February 2025 dental insurance premiums 2/5/2025 MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 131.65$ January 2025 fuel tax return 2/5/2025 MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 2,179.00$ 2024 Sales tax return Total 264,110.22$ Automatic Deduction / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursement Check Register (See register for detail) Automatic Deduction / Electronic Funds Transfer Total Expenditures For Approval Agenda Item: 6b 3 Council Meeting: 02/13/2025 CLAIMS PENDING COUNCIL APPROVAL Prepared By: Reed Kottke, Accountant BANK CODE: GEN CHECK DATE: 01/23/2025 INVOICE PAY DATE FROM 01/23/2025 TO 01/23/2025 01/24/2025 08:53 AM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran Page: 1/1CHECK PROOF FOR CITY OF CORCORAN # InvoicesTotal AmountCredit TotalInvoice TotalVendor NameVendor CodeCheck #BankCheck Date 14,000.09 0.00 4,000.09 AMELIA FADDEN291436446GEN01/23/2025 1300.98 0.00 300.98 BRANDON MAURERMISC36447GEN01/23/2025 31##2,367.39 112.47 2,479.86 CINTAS - 4705636448GEN01/23/2025 1353.22 0.00 353.22 CODY HARFFMISC36449GEN01/23/2025 1936,385.23 0.00 36,385.23 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH242736450GEN01/23/2025 1384.62 0.00 384.62 MATT GOTTSCHALK211736451GEN01/23/2025 1292.98 0.00 292.98 GREGORY, ERIC273036452GEN01/23/2025 2355.96 0.00 355.96 BRANDON HEINZ22836453GEN01/23/2025 112.50 0.00 12.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCTS RECEIVABLE68836454GEN01/23/2025 175.00 0.00 75.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE185936455GEN01/23/2025 1679.12 0.00 679.12 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936456GEN01/23/2025 11.07 0.00 1.07 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936457GEN01/23/2025 11.07 0.00 1.07 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936458GEN01/23/2025 12.72 0.00 2.72 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936459GEN01/23/2025 11.53 0.00 1.53 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936460GEN01/23/2025 11.23 0.00 1.23 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936461GEN01/23/2025 11.23 0.00 1.23 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936462GEN01/23/2025 12.32 0.00 2.32 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936463GEN01/23/2025 12.32 0.00 2.32 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936464GEN01/23/2025 11.57 0.00 1.57 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936465GEN01/23/2025 12,686.66 0.00 2,686.66 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936466GEN01/23/2025 1282.98 0.00 282.98 KOTTKE, ROBBIE243436467GEN01/23/2025 2397.14 0.00 397.14 LIGHTBULBS.COM225836468GEN01/23/2025 1385.95 0.00 385.95 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE5836469GEN01/23/2025 119,702.00 0.00 19,702.00 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE5836470GEN01/23/2025 3810.00 0.00 810.00 MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW, LLC256136471GEN01/23/2025 1100.00 0.00 100.00 MBPTA299336472GEN01/23/2025 170.00 0.00 70.00 MNGFOA313136473GEN01/23/2025 1280.98 0.00 280.98 PAT MEISTER13136474GEN01/23/2025 1285.98 0.00 285.98 REINKING, MARK252036475GEN01/23/2025 11,613.33 0.00 1,613.33 SAFE AND SOUND HOME SYSTEMS INC318936476GEN01/23/2025 167.25 0.00 67.25 SURPLUS SERVICES303136477GEN01/23/2025 17,831.68 0.00 7,831.68 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT184436478GEN01/23/2025 ## Denotes that check has vendor credit applied. Num Stubs: 0Num Checks: 33 Num Invoices: 85 Total Amount: 79,736.10 BANK CODE: GEN CHECK DATE: 01/24/2025 INVOICE PAY DATE FROM 01/24/2025 TO 01/24/2025 01/24/2025 12:31 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran Page: 1/1CHECK PROOF FOR CITY OF CORCORAN # InvoicesTotal AmountCredit TotalInvoice TotalVendor NameVendor CodeCheck #BankCheck Date 1341.64 0.00 341.64 CODY HARFFMISC36479GEN01/24/2025 Num Stubs: 0Num Checks: 1 Num Invoices: 1 Total Amount: 341.64 BANK CODE: GEN CHECK DATE: 01/24/2025 INVOICE PAY DATE FROM 01/24/2025 TO 01/24/2025 01/24/2025 12:51 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran Page: 1/1CHECK PROOF FOR CITY OF CORCORAN # InvoicesTotal AmountCredit TotalInvoice TotalVendor NameVendor CodeCheck #BankCheck Date 1183.86 0.00 183.86 BRANDON MAURERMISC36480GEN01/24/2025 Num Stubs: 0Num Checks: 1 Num Invoices: 1 Total Amount: 183.86 BANK CODE: GEN CHECK DATE: 02/06/2025 INVOICE PAY DATE FROM 02/06/2025 TO 02/06/2025 02/06/2025 03:29 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran Page: 1/2CHECK PROOF FOR CITY OF CORCORAN # InvoicesTotal AmountCredit TotalInvoice TotalVendor NameVendor CodeCheck #BankCheck Date 110,833.00 0.00 10,833.00 ABDO LLP536579GEN02/06/2025 111,660.00 0.00 11,660.00 ABDO LLP536580GEN02/06/2025 110,822.50 0.00 10,822.50 ABDO LLP536581GEN02/06/2025 16,800.00 0.00 6,800.00 ABDO LLP536582GEN02/06/2025 31,397.00 0.00 1,397.00 ALTA207136583GEN02/06/2025 121.44 0.00 21.44 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC4236584GEN02/06/2025 2145.00 0.00 145.00 CULLIGAN DEPARTMENT 8509319336585GEN02/06/2025 160.90 0.00 60.90 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER219536586GEN02/06/2025 1902.07 0.00 902.07 DAILY PRINTING INC319136587GEN02/06/2025 13,726.00 0.00 3,726.00 DELETEME BY ABINE INC257536588GEN02/06/2025 16.00 0.00 6.00 DVS82136589GEN02/06/2025 3344.52 0.00 344.52 ECM PUBLISHERS INC201136590GEN02/06/2025 2251.92 0.00 251.92 FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING, LLC27836591GEN02/06/2025 2408.60 0.00 408.60 FREEDOM FOREVERMISC36592GEN02/06/2025 175.00 0.00 75.00 GAYLE SOUTHWELL260036593GEN02/06/2025 1198.75 0.00 198.75 BRANDON HEINZ22836594GEN02/06/2025 11,376.03 0.00 1,376.03 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936595GEN02/06/2025 11,580.40 0.00 1,580.40 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER9936596GEN02/06/2025 22,981.25 0.00 2,981.25 HERREID & ASSOCIATE CONSULTING313836597GEN02/06/2025 111,125.15 0.00 11,125.15 HKGI312236598GEN02/06/2025 13,556.80 0.00 3,556.80 KRIS ENGINEERING24836599GEN02/06/2025 19,548.00 0.00 9,548.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES19136600GEN02/06/2025 45,455.34 0.00 5,455.34 LUBE-TECH & PARTNERS, LLC235036601GEN02/06/2025 14,764.90 0.00 4,764.90 M&J TRUCKING CO., LLC315136602GEN02/06/2025 52,201.68 0.00 2,201.68 MC TOOL & SAFETY253836603GEN02/06/2025 7##256.43 207.95 464.38 MENARDS BUFFALO194436604GEN02/06/2025 111,863.25 0.00 1,863.25 MENARDS MAPLE GROVE16736605GEN02/06/2025 45,958.51 0.00 5,958.51 METRO SALES INC224536606GEN02/06/2025 11,180.23 0.00 1,180.23 MILLER CHEVROLET20336607GEN02/06/2025 153.58 0.00 53.58 NALISHA WILLIAMS317136608GEN02/06/2025 134.99 0.00 34.99 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT12836609GEN02/06/2025 74,900.84 0.00 4,900.84 NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT175936610GEN02/06/2025 19,560.00 0.00 9,560.00 OERTEL ARCHITECTS192736611GEN02/06/2025 21,287.27 0.00 1,287.27 POLLARD WATER228136612GEN02/06/2025 12,003.58 0.00 2,003.58 POWERSCHOOL GROUP LLC314336613GEN02/06/2025 1196.99 0.00 196.99 REPUBLIC SERVICES13836614GEN02/06/2025 1343.45 0.00 343.45 REPUBLIC SERVICES13836615GEN02/06/2025 11,201.05 0.00 1,201.05 REPUBLIC SERVICES13836616GEN02/06/2025 1113.38 0.00 113.38 REPUBLIC SERVICES13836617GEN02/06/2025 11,161.03 0.00 1,161.03 REPUBLIC SERVICES13836618GEN02/06/2025 21,308.00 0.00 1,308.00 SNAP-ON TOOLS293936619GEN02/06/2025 41,049.81 0.00 1,049.81 STREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT14836620GEN02/06/2025 11,896.00 0.00 1,896.00 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC27636621GEN02/06/2025 1616.20 0.00 616.20 TEAM FAIR INCMISC36622GEN02/06/2025 BANK CODE: GEN CHECK DATE: 02/06/2025 INVOICE PAY DATE FROM 02/06/2025 TO 02/06/2025 02/06/2025 03:29 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran Page: 2/2CHECK PROOF FOR CITY OF CORCORAN # InvoicesTotal AmountCredit TotalInvoice TotalVendor NameVendor CodeCheck #BankCheck Date 11,015.00 0.00 1,015.00 ULTIMATE CLEANERS LLC266336623GEN02/06/2025 4914,642.59 0.00 14,642.59 U.S. BANK292836624GEN02/06/2025 154.00 0.00 54.00 WATER LABORATORIES, INC. 305136625GEN02/06/2025 42,795.65 0.00 2,795.65 ZEP SALES & SERVICE17636626GEN02/06/2025 ## Denotes that check has vendor credit applied. Num Stubs: 0Num Checks: 48 Num Invoices: 144 Total Amount: 143,734.08 BANK CODE: GEN CHECK DATE: 02/13/2025 INVOICE PAY DATE FROM 02/13/2025 TO 02/13/2025 02/06/2025 04:28 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran Page: 1/1CHECK PROOF FOR CITY OF CORCORAN # InvoicesTotal AmountCredit TotalInvoice TotalVendor NameVendor CodeCheck #BankCheck Date 130,520.00 0.00 30,520.00 ABDO LLP536627GEN02/13/2025 237,952.46 0.00 37,952.46 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC319236628GEN02/13/2025 15,061.03 0.00 5,061.03 FEHN COMPANIES186836629GEN02/13/2025 120,933.77 0.00 20,933.77 HKGI312236630GEN02/13/2025 1116,605.00 0.00 116,605.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TRST159436631GEN02/13/2025 1283,410.00 0.00 283,410.00 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE5836632GEN02/13/2025 1116,798.83 0.00 116,798.83 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE5836633GEN02/13/2025 1122,440.15 0.00 122,440.15 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE5836634GEN02/13/2025 170,656.61 0.00 70,656.61 METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES11736635GEN02/13/2025 261,227.18 0.00 61,227.18 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO226736636GEN02/13/2025 154,670.00 0.00 54,670.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL137536637GEN02/13/2025 120,206.44 0.00 20,206.44 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY168036638GEN02/13/2025 21,545,837.50 0.00 1,545,837.50 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP308536639GEN02/13/2025 5165,269.91 0.00 165,269.91 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES170836640GEN02/13/2025 Num Stubs: 0Num Checks: 14 Num Invoices: 21 Total Amount: 2,651,588.88 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 1/5Page: 02/06/2025 04:44 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36446 364464,000.09 01/23/2520241231DEPENDENT CARE REIMBURSEMENTAMELIA FADDEN12/31/24100-00000-21710 4,000.09 Total For Check 36446 Check 36447 36447300.98 01/23/25202412312024 BOOT ALLOWANCEBRANDON MAURER12/31/24100-43100-50417 300.98 Total For Check 36447 Check 36448 3644835.00 01/23/254211983653CITY HALL BLACK MAT QTY 8 WEEKLYCINTAS - 47011/19/24100-41900-50400 3644825.00 01/23/254212727976CITY HALL BLACK MAT QTY 8 WEEKLYCINTAS - 47011/25/24100-41900-50400 3644825.00 01/23/254213579852CITY HALL BLACK MAT QTY 8 WEEKLYCINTAS - 47012/04/24100-41900-50400 3644825.00 01/23/254214325782CITY HALL BLACK MAT QTY 8 WEEKLYCINTAS - 47012/11/24100-41900-50400 3644821.14 01/23/254215056809CITY HALL BLACK MAT QTY 8 WEEKLYCINTAS - 47012/18/24100-41900-50400 3644821.14 01/23/254215747191CITY HALL BLACK MAT QTY 8 WEEKLYCINTAS - 47012/24/24100-41900-50400 3644821.14 01/23/254216396378CITY HALL BLACK MAT QTY 8 WEEKLYCINTAS - 47012/31/24100-41900-50400 36448(67.02)01/23/2520241231CITY HALL / PUBLIC WORKS CREDITCINTAS - 47012/31/24100-41900-50400 3644856.70 01/23/254211983688PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFFCINTAS - 47011/19/24100-43100-50400 3644835.00 01/23/254211983693PUBLIC WORKS SHOP TOWEL RED WEEKLYCINTAS - 47011/19/24100-43100-50400 3644825.91 01/23/254212727948SMALL SHOP TOWELSCINTAS - 47011/25/24100-43100-50400 3644829.42 01/23/254212727996PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFFCINTAS - 47011/25/24100-43100-50400 3644825.91 01/23/254213579854SMALL SHOP TOWELSCINTAS - 47012/04/24100-43100-50400 3644853.60 01/23/254213579874PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFFCINTAS - 47012/04/24100-43100-50400 3644837.05 01/23/254214325799PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFF J PAVEYCINTAS - 47012/11/24100-43100-50400 3644825.91 01/23/254214325836SMALL SHOP TOWELSCINTAS - 47012/11/24100-43100-50400 3644861.23 01/23/254215056832PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFF J PAVEYCINTAS - 47012/18/24100-43100-50400 3644837.05 01/23/254215747302PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFF J PAVEYCINTAS - 47012/24/24100-43100-50400 3644825.91 01/23/254215056862SMALL SHOP TOWELSCINTAS - 47012/18/24100-43100-50400 3644825.91 01/23/254215747289PW SHOP TOWEL RED WEEKLYCINTAS - 47012/24/24100-43100-50400 3644825.91 01/23/254216396331SM SHOP TWL RED - WEEKLYCINTAS - 47012/31/24100-43100-50400 3644861.23 01/23/254216396464PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFF J PAVEYCINTAS - 47012/31/24100-43100-50400 364487.15 01/23/255240481401PW MEDICINE RESTOCK VARIOUSCINTAS - 47012/31/24100-43100-50400 364487.15 01/23/255244669901PW MEDICINE RESTOCK VARIOUSCINTAS - 47012/31/24100-43100-50400 36448(45.45)01/23/2520241231CITY HALL / PUBLIC WORKS CREDITCINTAS - 47012/31/24100-43100-50400 3644871.97 01/23/254211983688PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFFCINTAS - 47011/19/24100-43100-50417 36448164.43 01/23/254211983710PW UNIFORM KOTTKE HEINZ REINKING GREGORY MEISTERCINTAS - 47011/19/24100-43100-50417 3644875.07 01/23/254212727996PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFFCINTAS - 47011/25/24100-43100-50417 36448164.43 01/23/254212728056PW UNIFORM KOTTKE HEINZ REINKING GREGORY MEISTERCINTAS - 47011/25/24100-43100-50417 3644875.07 01/23/254213579874PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFFCINTAS - 47012/04/24100-43100-50417 36448164.43 01/23/254213579881PW UNIFORM KOTTKE HEINZ REINKING GREGORY MEISTERCINTAS - 47012/04/24100-43100-50417 3644898.07 01/23/254214325799PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFF J PAVEYCINTAS - 47012/11/24100-43100-50417 36448164.43 01/23/254214325889PW UNIFORM KOTTKE HEINZ REINKING GREGORY MEISTERCINTAS - 47012/11/24100-43100-50417 36448164.43 01/23/254215056913KOTTKE, HEINZ, REINKING, GREGORY, MEISTER UNIFORMSCINTAS - 47012/18/24100-43100-50417 3644898.07 01/23/254215056832PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFF J PAVEYCINTAS - 47012/18/24100-43100-50417 3644898.07 01/23/254215747302PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFF J PAVEYCINTAS - 47012/24/24100-43100-50417 36448164.43 01/23/254215747331KOTTKE, HEINZ, REINKING, GREGORY, MEISTER UNIFORMSCINTAS - 47012/24/24100-43100-50417 3644898.07 01/23/254216396464PW UNIFORM M ALGER B MAUER C HARFF J PAVEYCINTAS - 47012/31/24100-43100-50417 36448164.43 01/23/254216396421PW UNIFORM KOTTKE HEINZ REINKING GREGORY MEISTERCINTAS - 47012/31/24100-43100-50417 2,367.39 Total For Check 36448 Check 36449 36449353.22 01/23/2520241231-22024 BOOT ALLOWANCECODY HARFF12/31/24100-43100-50417 353.22 Total For Check 36449 Check 36450 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 2/5Page: 02/06/2025 04:44 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36450 364502,355.00 01/23/25389448CIT LENOVO THINKVISION LENOVO THINKPADCOMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50210 364502,324.00 01/23/25389477CIT PROACTIVE PREMIUM MANAGED SERVICES DECEMBER 2024COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50300 364501,442.50 01/23/25389860CIT SERVICES ONSITE REMOTE THRU 11/19/2024COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50300 364502,600.00 01/23/25390243CIT RETAINER DECEMBER 2024COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50300 364502,805.00 01/23/25390879CIT SERVICES ONSITE REMOTE THRU 11/30/2024COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50300 364502,324.00 01/23/25391700CIT PROACTIVE PREMIUM MANAGED SERVICES JANUARY 2025COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/13/24100-41920-50300 364502,600.00 01/23/25392529CIT RETAINER JANUARY 2025COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH01/02/25100-41920-50300 364502,436.00 01/23/25393968CIT PROACTIVE PREMIUM MANAGED SERVICES FEBRUARY 2025COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH01/15/25100-41920-50300 364501,195.00 01/23/25392345CIT SERVICES ONSITE REMOTE THRU 12/11/2024COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50300 364502,557.50 01/23/25393040CIT SERVICES ONSITE REMOTE THRU 12/31/2024COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50300 364502,553.60 01/23/25388609CIT M365 DOMESTIC CALLING / TEAMSCOMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50308 36450608.40 01/23/25389029CIT SIEM 365 DAY RETENTION QTY 72 DECEMBER 2024COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50308 36450608.40 01/23/25390700CIT SIEM 365 DAY RETENTION QTY 72 JANUARY 2025COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50308 364501,445.33 01/23/25391488CIT SIRIS 5 BACKUP AGREEMENT DECEMBER 2024COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50308 364502,621.60 01/23/25391086CIT M365 DOMESTIC CALLING / TEAMS DECEMBER 2024COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50308 364501,295.00 01/23/25392442CIT SIRIS 5 BACKUP AGREEMENT JANUARY 2025COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH12/31/24100-41920-50308 36450625.30 01/23/25393237CIT SIEM 365 DAY RETENTION QTY 74 FEBRUARY 2025COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH01/08/25100-41920-50308 364501,295.00 01/23/25393464CIT SIRIS 5 BACKUP AGREEMENT FEBRUARY 2025COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH01/15/25100-41920-50308 364502,693.60 01/23/25393639CIT M365 DOMESTIC CALLING / TEAMS JANUARY 2025COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH01/15/25100-41920-50308 36,385.23 Total For Check 36450 Check 36451 36451384.62 01/23/2520241231DEPENDENT CARE REIMBURSEMENTMATT GOTTSCHALK12/31/24100-00000-21710 384.62 Total For Check 36451 Check 36452 36452292.98 01/23/25202412312024 BOOT ALLOWANCEGREGORY, ERIC12/31/24100-43100-50417 292.98 Total For Check 36452 Check 36453 3645375.00 01/23/2520241206COMMERCIAL CLASS A ENHANCED LICENSE B HEINZBRANDON HEINZ12/31/24100-43100-50207 36453280.96 01/23/25202412312024 BOOT ALLOWANCEBRANDON HEINZ12/31/24100-43100-50417 355.96 Total For Check 36453 Check 36454 3645412.50 01/23/2520241231VIEW RECORDED DOCUMENTS M PRITCHARDHENNEPIN COUNTY ACCTS RECEIVABLE12/31/24100-42400-50300 12.50 Total For Check 36454 Check 36455 3645575.00 01/23/251000236671JAIL PER DIEM NOVEMBER 2024HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE12/17/24100-42100-50305 75.00 Total For Check 36455 Check 36456 36456679.12 01/23/25202412312024 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 25-119-23-23-0005HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 679.12 Total For Check 36456 Check 36457 364571.07 01/23/2520241231-22024 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 35-119-23-13-0049HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 1.07 Total For Check 36457 Check 36458 364581.07 01/23/2520241231-32024 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 35-119-23-13-0050HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 1.07 Total For Check 36458 Check 36459 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 3/5Page: 02/06/2025 04:44 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36459 364592.72 01/23/250073-20232023 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 12-119-23-21-0073HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 2.72 Total For Check 36459 Check 36460 364601.53 01/23/250143-20232023 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 35-119-23-41-0143HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 1.53 Total For Check 36460 Check 36461 364611.23 01/23/250040-20232023 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 12-119-23-12-0040HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 1.23 Total For Check 36461 Check 36462 364621.23 01/23/250039-20232023 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 12-119-23-12-0039HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 1.23 Total For Check 36462 Check 36463 364632.32 01/23/250049-20232023 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 25-119-23-34-0049HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 2.32 Total For Check 36463 Check 36464 364642.32 01/23/252023-00272023 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 25-119-23-14-0027HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 2.32 Total For Check 36464 Check 36465 364651.57 01/23/252023-00692023 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 01-119-23-34-0069HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 1.57 Total For Check 36465 Check 36466 364662,686.66 01/23/250010-20242023 PROPERTY TAXES FOR 12-119-22-0010HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-41550-50210 2,686.66 Total For Check 36466 Check 36467 36467282.98 01/23/25202412312024 BOOT ALLOWANCEKOTTKE, ROBBIE12/31/24100-43100-50417 282.98 Total For Check 36467 Check 36468 36468379.44 01/23/25INV4109849REPLACEMENT DRIVER QTY 4LIGHTBULBS.COM12/31/24100-45200-50210 3646817.70 01/23/25INV4134330LED ITEM SL41111 QTY 6LIGHTBULBS.COM12/31/24100-45200-50210 397.14 Total For Check 36468 Check 36469 36469385.95 01/23/252024Q44TH QUARTER 2024 8025 RIDGE CTCITY OF MAPLE GROVE01/17/25601-00000-20800 385.95 Total For Check 36469 Check 36470 3647019,702.00 01/23/25202412102024 SEMI ANNUAL WATER SERVICE CONTRACT PAYMENTCITY OF MAPLE GROVE12/10/24601-49400-50310 19,702.00 Total For Check 36470 Check 36471 36471160.00 01/23/252962THERAPY SESSION QTY 1MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW, LLC12/31/24100-41900-50300 36471390.00 01/23/253000MANDATORY CHECK IN QTY 3MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW, LLC12/31/24100-41900-50300 36471260.00 01/23/253044MANDATORY CHECK IN QTY 2MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW, LLC12/31/24100-41900-50300 810.00 Total For Check 36471 Check 36472 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 4/5Page: 02/06/2025 04:44 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36472 36472100.00 01/23/25202501012025 MBPTA MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION S ZUTHERMBPTA01/01/25100-42400-50433 100.00 Total For Check 36472 Check 36473 3647370.00 01/23/2517612025 ANNUAL MNGFOA MEMBERSHIP KOTTKEMNGFOA01/17/25100-41500-50433 70.00 Total For Check 36473 Check 36474 36474280.98 01/23/25202412312024 BOOT ALLOWANCEPAT MEISTER12/31/24100-43100-50417 280.98 Total For Check 36474 Check 36475 36475285.98 01/23/25202412312024 BOOT ALLOWANCEREINKING, MARK12/31/24100-43100-50417 285.98 Total For Check 36475 Check 36476 364761,613.33 01/23/251666AUDIO/VISUAL MOUNTING AT CITY HALLSAFE AND SOUND HOME SYSTEMS INC12/24/24100-41900-50210 1,613.33 Total For Check 36476 Check 36477 3647767.25 01/23/251692/1644CITY HALL OFFICE FIXTURESSURPLUS SERVICES12/31/24100-41900-50210 67.25 Total For Check 36477 Check 36478 364787,831.68 01/23/2535031866206ELECTRIC DECEMBER 2024WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/25100-41900-50381 7,831.68 Total For Check 36478 Check 36479 36479341.64 01/24/2520250124PP2 20250124 MANUAL CHECK HARFFCODY HARFF01/24/25100-43100-50101 341.64 Total For Check 36479 Check 36480 36480183.86 01/24/2520250124PP2 20250124 MANUAL CHECK MAURERBRANDON MAURER01/24/25100-43100-50101 183.86 Total For Check 36480 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 5/5Page: 02/06/2025 04:44 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number 60,173.65 Fund 100 GENERAL FUND 20,087.95 Fund 601 WATER Fund Totals: 80,261.60 Total For All Funds: CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 1/7Page: 02/06/2025 04:56 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36579 3657910,833.00 02/06/25500255JANUARY 2025 FINANCE MGR SERVICES 90122FS.ABDO LLP01/01/25100-41500-50300 10,833.00 Total For Check 36579 Check 36580 3658011,660.00 02/06/25499850DECEMBER 2024 ACCOUNTING SERVICES 90122FS.ABDO LLP12/31/24100-41500-50300 11,660.00 Total For Check 36580 Check 36581 3658110,822.50 02/06/25499851DECEMBER 2024 ACCOUNTING SERVICES 90122FS.ABDO LLP12/31/24100-41500-50300 10,822.50 Total For Check 36581 Check 36582 365826,800.00 02/06/25499365NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2024 HR/PAYROLL CONSULTING 41390.WSABDO LLP12/31/24100-41500-50300 6,800.00 Total For Check 36582 Check 36583 36583132.00 02/06/2521490LASER ENGRAVING ON CUSTOMER SUPPLIED BLACK BRASS PLATES (COUNCIL MEMBERS AND MAYORS)ALTA01/31/25100-41110-50207 36583475.00 02/06/252148915" X 21" ELLIPTICAL EDGE WALNUT PLAGUE W/ 60 BLACK BRASS PLATES- COUNCIL MEMBERSALTA01/31/25100-41110-50207 36583790.00 02/06/2521115LEGACY WALL PERPETUAL PLAQUES-WALNUT PLAQUE (5 EA)ALTA12/18/24100-41900-50210 1,397.00 Total For Check 36583 Check 36584 3658421.44 02/06/25093P27164.02LAMP LED 2.5 QTY 4BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC01/16/25100-43100-50220 21.44 Total For Check 36584 Check 36585 3658559.00 02/06/25100X08367000FEBRUARY 2025 ADMIN WATERCULLIGAN DEPARTMENT 850901/31/25100-41900-50210 3658586.00 02/06/25100X08391000FEBRUARY 2025 POLICE WATERCULLIGAN DEPARTMENT 850901/31/25100-41900-50210 145.00 Total For Check 36585 Check 36586 3658660.90 02/06/25114X01717103JANUARY 2025 BOTTLED WATER DELIVERYCULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER01/31/25100-41900-50210 60.90 Total For Check 36586 Check 36587 36587902.07 02/06/2551146072025 Q1 NEWSLETTER POSTAGEDAILY PRINTING INC01/31/25100-41900-50350 902.07 Total For Check 36587 Check 36588 365883,726.00 02/06/25CORC-0006PD TECH SERVICEDELETEME BY ABINE INC12/31/24100-42100-50300 3,726.00 Total For Check 36588 Check 36589 365896.00 02/06/2520250203MN100 K9 PLATES QTY 2DVS02/03/25100-42100-50220 6.00 Total For Check 36589 Check 36590 36590162.47 02/06/251029763ORDINANCE NO. 2024-537 CITY CODE RELATED TO NEW HOME CONSTRUCTIONECM PUBLISHERS INC12/26/24100-41900-50350 3659094.98 02/06/251029765JAN 9 PUBLIC HEARING EASMENT VACATIONECM PUBLISHERS INC12/26/24100-41900-50350 3659087.07 02/06/251029764PRESS RELEASE WORKSHEETECM PUBLISHERS INC12/26/24100-41900-50350 344.52 Total For Check 36590 Check 36591 36591170.10 02/06/25IN001-2029509BULKHEAD, M12, PANEL MOUNT, MALE TO FEMALEFORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING, LLC12/23/24100-43100-50220 3659181.82 02/06/25IN001-2029129BULKHEAD, M12, PANEL MOUNT, MALE TO FEMALEFORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING, LLC12/20/24100-43100-50220 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 2/7Page: 02/06/2025 04:56 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36591 251.92 Total For Check 36591 Check 36592 36592212.18 02/06/25P24-0820CANCELED PERMIT P24-0820 6470 TAMARACK LNFREEDOM FOREVER12/31/24100-00000-32210 36592196.42 02/06/25P24-0657CANCELED PERMIT P24-0657 19924 64TH AVEFREEDOM FOREVER12/31/24100-00000-32210 408.60 Total For Check 36592 Check 36593 3659375.00 02/06/2520240906PP18 20240906 CHECK REPLACEMENTGAYLE SOUTHWELL12/31/24100-41410-50114 75.00 Total For Check 36593 Check 36594 36594198.75 02/06/2520250206HRA PAYOUTBRANDON HEINZ02/03/25100-00000-21710 198.75 Total For Check 36594 Check 36595 365951,376.03 02/06/2520250108TRUTH IN TAXATION NOTICES 2024-25HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER01/08/25100-41900-50210 1,376.03 Total For Check 36595 Check 36596 365961,580.40 02/06/251000237662RADIO FLEET FEE DECEMBER 2024 POLICEHENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER12/31/24100-42100-50323 1,580.40 Total For Check 36596 Check 36597 36597762.50 02/06/251315MANAGEMENT TRAININGHERREID & ASSOCIATE CONSULTING01/24/25100-41900-50300 365972,218.75 02/06/251315-2MANAGEMENT TRAININGHERREID & ASSOCIATE CONSULTING01/24/25100-41900-50300 2,981.25 Total For Check 36597 Check 36598 3659811,125.15 02/06/25023-058-12PARK PLANNING AND DESIGN NOVEMBER 2024HKGI12/31/24415-45200-50300 11,125.15 Total For Check 36598 Check 36599 365993,556.80 02/06/2540717G28 TOOTH (65/BOX) 38# OLD P/N K1LS-2244-2869KRIS ENGINEERING12/16/24100-43122-50224 3,556.80 Total For Check 36599 Check 36600 366009,548.00 02/06/25418886LMC MEMBERSHIP DUES 2025LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES01/01/25100-41900-50433 9,548.00 Total For Check 36600 Check 36601 366011,529.94 02/06/2536979272024 MOBIL 1 OW-20 - 55 GA DRUMLUBE-TECH & PARTNERS, LLC01/04/25100-42100-50220 36601222.60 02/06/2536865862024 MOBIL 1 M1-212 FILTER (3 EA)LUBE-TECH & PARTNERS, LLC12/18/24100-42100-50220 366013,589.54 02/06/253697926ALL SEASON WINDSHIELD WASHER, MOBIL 1 5W-30 55 GA DRUM, DELVAC 1300 SUPER 15W-4 (2 EA)LUBE-TECH & PARTNERS, LLC01/04/25100-43100-50212 36601113.26 02/06/253686585MOBIL 1 ESP X2 OW-20-6/1 QT CASE (2 EA)LUBE-TECH & PARTNERS, LLC12/18/24100-43100-50212 5,455.34 Total For Check 36601 Check 36602 366024,764.90 02/06/25501271 WAY IMPORT TRAILERS 16 LOADSM&J TRUCKING CO., LLC12/17/24100-43122-50400 4,764.90 Total For Check 36602 Check 36603 3660390.00 02/06/25020488AFROGWEAR MESH PANT QTY 2MC TOOL & SAFETY12/31/24100-43100-50210 366031,084.55 02/06/25020870SAFETY GLASSES QTY 12 TRAFFIC CONE QTY 50MC TOOL & SAFETY12/31/24100-43100-50210 3660396.34 02/06/25021285REFLECTIVE JACKET LIME QTY 1MC TOOL & SAFETY12/31/24100-43100-50210 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 3/7Page: 02/06/2025 04:56 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36603 36603764.97 02/06/25021249BIBS INSULATED QTY 4MC TOOL & SAFETY12/31/24100-45200-50210 36603165.82 02/06/25021249ABIBS INSULATED QTY 1MC TOOL & SAFETY12/31/24100-45200-50210 2,201.68 Total For Check 36603 Check 36604 36604115.93 02/06/2520415120 CT LED VINTAGE ICICLE, 4'X6' LED VINTAGE NET, 300 CT ICICLEMENARDS BUFFALO12/10/24100-43100-50210 3660436.61 02/06/252043216-3 10' GREEN CORD, GREEN TRIPLE TAP ADAPTER, 4X6 LED VINTAGE NETMENARDS BUFFALO12/10/24100-43100-50210 3660461.86 02/06/252042510' GREEN CORD, 300 CT LED VINTAGE ICICLE, 2-PK GROUNDING ADAPTERMENARDS BUFFALO12/10/24100-43100-50210 36604(49.98)02/06/2520431300 CT LED VINTAGE ICICLE - RETURN CHARGEMENARDS BUFFALO12/10/24100-43100-50210 36604(27.98)02/06/25204214'X6' 120 CT LED VNTGE -RETURN CHARGEMENARDS BUFFALO12/10/24100-43100-50210 36604249.98 02/06/252029511' W INFLATABLE, 8'W INFLATABLEMENARDS BUFFALO12/08/24100-45200-50210 36604(129.99)02/06/25204668' W INFLATABLE- RETURN CHARGEMENARDS BUFFALO12/11/24100-45200-50210 256.43 Total For Check 36604 Check 36605 36605243.94 02/06/2541970SG SEAM REPAIR, KEYSTONE WALL PLATE, QC PUNCH TOOL, CAT6 COUPLERMENARDS MAPLE GROVE12/12/24100-41900-50210 3660511.73 02/06/2542436KLEARVUE STOTEN WHITE, PVC CEILBOX CVR MENARDS MAPLE GROVE12/23/24100-41900-50210 36605135.07 02/06/25421222X4-8' PREMIUM/SELECT, BLACK RUBBER NUGGETS, FAST DRY SPACKLING, DOOR BTM SLIDEON BLKMENARDS MAPLE GROVE12/16/24100-41900-50210 366059.58 02/06/2543183REG FOOD SCOOP 1 CUP, SUPER QUICKFILL FUNNEL, SAND MIXMENARDS MAPLE GROVE01/09/25100-41900-50210 3660527.46 02/06/25419712024 CONDUIT, LOW VOLT CABLE, DURACELL 9V-2 PK, 5 PK 1/2" PVC COND STRAPMENARDS MAPLE GROVE12/12/24100-42100-50220 36605172.98 02/06/2542569HEAVY DUTY NO FLAT PART BOX, HEAVY DUTY HANDLES, POLY TRAYMENARDS MAPLE GROVE12/27/24100-43100-50210 36605621.51 02/06/2542824CHISEL 1-1/2"X10", MAX HAMMERMENARDS MAPLE GROVE01/02/25100-43100-50210 3660513.76 02/06/2542513CARR BOLT, AIRCRAFT DRILL BITMENARDS MAPLE GROVE12/26/24100-45200-50210 36605292.54 02/06/2543128WALLPK D2D 16800LMSEL CCT, VOLTAGE TESTERMENARDS MAPLE GROVE01/08/25100-45200-50210 36605319.69 02/06/2543184REFLECTIVE LETTER, BATTERIES, S-HOOK, CUP HOOKMENARDS MAPLE GROVE01/09/25100-45200-50210 3660514.99 02/06/2542185ANTI FATIGUE MATMENARDS MAPLE GROVE12/18/24601-49400-50210 1,863.25 Total For Check 36605 Check 36606 366063,371.07 02/06/25INV2631293COPIER 10/30/24-1/29/25 BILLING 7/30-24-10/29/24 USAGEMETRO SALES INC12/31/24100-41920-50210 36606411.07 02/06/25INV2669177COPIER CONTRACT LEASE CHARGEMETRO SALES INC12/31/24100-41920-50210 36606411.07 02/06/25INV2689943COPIER CONTRACT LEASE CHARGEMETRO SALES INC01/15/25100-41920-50210 366061,765.30 02/06/25INV2699169COPIER 1/30/25-4/29/25 BILLING 10/30/24-1/29/24 USAGEMETRO SALES INC01/27/25100-41920-50210 5,958.51 Total For Check 36606 Check 36607 366071,180.23 02/06/25CTCS736199BODY WORK AND REMOTE KEY CONCERNSMILLER CHEVROLET12/31/24100-41900-50403 1,180.23 Total For Check 36607 Check 36608 3660853.58 02/06/2520250204MCMA WINTER WORKSHOPNALISHA WILLIAMS02/04/25100-41400-50207 53.58 Total For Check 36608 Check 36609 3660934.99 02/06/25154050102225030502KLUTCH 48 IN BLOW GUN QTY 1NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT01/22/25100-43100-50210 34.99 Total For Check 36609 Check 36610 36610411.56 02/06/25PSO157131-1LAMP, BRACKET, LED 10 SERIES BEEHIVE LAMNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT11/22/24100-43100-50220 3661066.98 02/06/25PSO171360-1INDICATOR - PART NUMBER 25171098 MTNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT01/21/25100-43100-50220 36610429.24 02/06/25SWO038216-12021 TRUCK INSPECTION OF CHECK LIGHTNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT11/08/24100-43100-50220 36610320.30 02/06/25SWO039136-12017 TRUCK CHECK ENGINE LIGHT INSPECTION AND CORRECTIONNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT11/21/24100-43100-50220 366103,298.33 02/06/25SWO036453-22017 TRUCK INSPECT FOR LEAKAGE AND CORRECTIONNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT11/19/24100-43100-50220 3661079.33 02/06/25PSO163184-1HOSENUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT12/16/24100-43100-50220 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 4/7Page: 02/06/2025 04:56 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36610 36610295.10 02/06/25PSO164751-1WIPER ARM AND WIPER BLADESNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT12/30/24100-43100-50220 4,900.84 Total For Check 36610 Check 36611 366119,560.00 02/06/2524-26.3COMMUNITY PARK DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 2024OERTEL ARCHITECTS12/31/24415-45200-50300 9,560.00 Total For Check 36611 Check 36612 36612414.18 02/06/250277082-24X5 24 WIRE FLAG BLUE, 4X5 24 WIRE FLAG WHITEPOLLARD WATER12/16/24601-49400-50210 36612873.09 02/06/250278319-2FERGUSON ENTERPRISES LLC 3326POLLARD WATER02/05/25601-49400-50220 1,287.27 Total For Check 36612 Check 36613 366132,003.58 02/06/25INV4311452025 CIVICLIVE SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTIONPOWERSCHOOL GROUP LLC12/31/24100-41920-50300 2,003.58 Total For Check 36613 Check 36614 36614196.99 02/06/250894-007021229PUBLIC WORKS 9100 CO RD LORETTO JANUARY 2025REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/25100-43100-50380 196.99 Total For Check 36614 Check 36615 36615343.45 02/06/250894-007020360CITY PARK 20200 CO RD 50 FEBRUARY 2025REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/25100-45200-50380 343.45 Total For Check 36615 Check 36616 366161,201.05 02/06/250894-007020494CITY HALL 8200 CO RD 116 JANUARY 2025REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/25100-41900-50380 1,201.05 Total For Check 36616 Check 36617 36617113.38 02/06/250894-007022199WILDFLOWER PARK FEBRUARY 2025REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/25100-45200-50380 113.38 Total For Check 36617 Check 36618 366181,161.03 02/06/250894-007015982CONTRACT RECYCLING SERVICE JANUARY 2025REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/25100-43201-50300 1,161.03 Total For Check 36618 Check 36619 366191,148.00 02/06/250128255900024.4 SOLUS PLUS FULL SCANBAYSNAP-ON TOOLS01/28/25100-43100-50210 36619160.00 02/06/2512122351765PH3050 REPAIR QTY 1SNAP-ON TOOLS12/31/24100-43100-50220 1,308.00 Total For Check 36619 Check 36620 36620224.95 02/06/25I17343582024 TRAFFIC VESTSTREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT12/13/24100-42100-50417 3662011.99 02/06/25I17350112024 NAME TAG CLOTH - J. REISNER- NEW HIRESTREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT12/17/24100-42100-50417 36620598.90 02/06/25I17363972024 UNIFORMS HARTNECK NEW HIRE STREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT12/26/24100-42100-50417 36620213.97 02/06/25I17359152024 NEW HIRE HARTNECKSTREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT12/20/24100-42100-50417 1,049.81 Total For Check 36620 Check 36621 366211,896.00 02/06/25102049992024 255/60R18 V EAGLE ENFORCER WINTER (12 EA)SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC12/20/24100-42100-50220 1,896.00 Total For Check 36621 Check 36622 36622616.20 02/06/25ER0016ESCROW REFUND - 19315 CR 30 OPHOVENTEAM FAIR INC01/30/25100-00000-22205 616.20 Total For Check 36622 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 5/7Page: 02/06/2025 04:56 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36623 366231,015.00 02/06/2525013000CITY HALL/PD CLEANING JANUARY 2025ULTIMATE CLEANERS LLC01/30/25100-41900-50401 1,015.00 Total For Check 36623 Check 36624 3662432.80 02/06/2520241210USPS BOND REFUND SHIPPINGCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/31/24100-00000-22205 3662420.50 02/06/2511RECORDING FILING FEECREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/06/24100-41400-50207 3662450.00 02/06/2520241223-22025 NORTHSTAR CHAPTER OF PAYROLLORG DUES KOTTKECREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/23/24100-41500-50433 36624232.95 02/06/25X3865HDMI CABLE ADJ SHELVES TABLET STANDCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/09/24100-41900-50210 36624134.97 02/06/25X8202ARTIFICIAL FICUS TREECREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/17/24100-41900-50210 36624209.94 02/06/25X9826ARTIFICIAL GRASS QTY 6CREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/17/24100-41900-50210 36624237.58 02/06/25X8636FLAGPOLE KIT OAK METAL EAGLECREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/17/24100-41900-50210 36624120.76 02/06/25X5440GRASS CATTAIL SPRAY QTY 3CREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/17/24100-41900-50210 3662472.59 02/06/25X9058KITCHEN BAKERS RACKCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/17/24100-41900-50210 36624119.99 02/06/25X5068FLAGPOLE KIT NO FLAGCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/17/24100-41900-50210 36624284.97 02/06/257507HORSE WATERER TRASH CANCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/12/24100-41900-50210 36624257.48 02/06/2567512BUSINESS CARDS REISNER LAWSONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/17/24100-42100-50200 3662470.64 02/06/25X1400SCREEN PROTECTOR GLUCOSE DIET SUPPLEMENT ASPIRINCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/17/24100-42100-50200 3662448.96 02/06/25X5439AT A GLANCE CALENDAR QTY 2CREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/05/24100-42100-50200 3662440.58 02/06/25X7863LAPTOP STANDCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/05/24100-42100-50200 36624699.00 02/06/2520222024 FIELD TRAINING OFFICERS CERTIFICATION EDSTROMCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/06/25100-42100-50207 36624155.00 02/06/25202412282024 TRAINING FOR HARTNECK AND BOHLSENCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/28/24100-42100-50207 36624155.00 02/06/25202501062024 MSCIC CONFERENCE TRAINGING FOR BURNSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/28/25100-42100-50207 36624930.00 02/06/256642TMSCIC 2025 WINTER CONFERENCECREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/09/24100-42100-50207 3662425.00 02/06/25X589CNOTARY TRAINING STEELMANCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/10/24100-42100-50207 36624899.00 02/06/25028DE7F5-0002STORM TRAINING GROUP 1/6-1/9 CREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/31/25100-42100-50207 3662414.72 02/06/2520241209-2GORILLA MOUNT QTY 2 CREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/28/25100-42100-50210 36624276.71 02/06/25578-22024 DETECTIVE VEHICLE FLOOR LINERSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/13/24100-42100-50210 366241,405.30 02/06/2520241212-22024 SHOP WITH A COP WARRENCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/12/24100-42100-50210 36624195.15 02/06/2520241210-22024 M18 TIRE INFLATOR QTY 1CREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/28/25100-42100-50220 36624803.38 02/06/251749-449060 2024 O'REILLY BRAKE ROTOR/DISC PAD SETCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/19/24100-42100-50220 36624164.71 02/06/2520241206-2GRAINGER BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIESCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/06/24100-42100-50223 36624185.37 02/06/251864564RUBBER DRAINAGE MATSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/18/24100-42100-50223 3662475.00 02/06/253609221-202412-1DECEMBER 2024 TRANSUNIONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/31/24100-42100-50300 3662491.87 02/06/2520241231DECEMBER 2024 FLEETIOCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/28/25100-42100-50300 3662444.02 02/06/251538928538852024 APPLE BUSINESS ESSENTIALS STORAGE PLANCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/26/24100-42100-50321 3662412.10 02/06/250211822024 USPS RAY ALLEN RETURN CREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/09/24100-42100-50322 36624217.08 02/06/25113-8449277-39282202024 4 ELECTRONIC MUFF QTY 4 CREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/28/25100-42100-50417 366241,202.20 02/06/2528325678STARTIGN UNIFORM HARTNECKCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/18/24100-42100-50417 36624114.44 02/06/255700BLACK BOX CUSTOMS HARTNECKCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/26/24100-42100-50417 36624206.28 02/06/25202412132025 MPPOA LDF DUESCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/28/25100-42100-50433 36624217.00 02/06/25MU0232114063MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSCN DUESCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/06/24100-42100-50433 3662414.00 02/06/25202412252024 PACKTRACK SUBSCRIPTIONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/25/24100-42100-50438 3662498.99 02/06/250109862024 PETSMART DOG FOODCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/19/24100-42100-50438 36624700.00 02/06/258959982025 INSTITUTE FOR BUILDING OFFICIALSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/31/25100-42400-50207 36624234.24 02/06/25X7018WORK BOOTS SOIL SAMPLER DESK MATCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/06/24100-42400-50331 36624160.00 02/06/25101919947CODE SPECIALIST EXAMCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/24/24100-42400-50433 3662459.00 02/06/2520241223MRPA AWARD CEREMONY LUNCHEONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/28/25100-42401-50207 3662478.78 02/06/25098729CUB BAKERY ITEMSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/09/24100-43100-50207 366241,337.71 02/06/2515562GARAGE DOOR SEALERCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/14/24100-43100-50223 36624297.98 02/06/252181992024 BOOT ALLOWANCE KOLLESCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/23/24100-43100-50417 3662415.00 02/06/255492TOY DRIVE SUPPLIESCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/06/25100-45100-50210 3662470.00 02/06/25316172CPRP DUES RENEWALCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/06/25100-45100-50433 366241,553.85 02/06/2520241209RTIC OUTDOORS CUPS COFFEE WITH A COPCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/28/25201-42100-50210 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 6/7Page: 02/06/2025 04:56 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36624 14,642.59 Total For Check 36624 Check 36625 3662554.00 02/06/2595215COLIOFORM TEST 1/9/25WATER LABORATORIES, INC. 01/09/25601-49400-50210 54.00 Total For Check 36625 Check 36626 36626832.62 02/06/259010720001ZEP-O-SHINE_ 55 GLZEP SALES & SERVICE01/16/25100-43100-50210 36626544.46 02/06/259010657889ZEP FORMULA 50_20 GLZEP SALES & SERVICE12/31/24100-43100-50220 3662674.24 02/06/259010198443BOWL CLIP BLUE SKY 12 EAZEP SALES & SERVICE12/01/24100-45200-50210 366261,344.33 02/06/259010596126HAND SOAP, AIR FRESH ASSORTMENT, BLUE/YELLOW SPRAYER, TORK HB RL TWL-2 PLYZEP SALES & SERVICE12/11/24100-45200-50210 2,795.65 Total For Check 36626 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 7/7Page: 02/06/2025 04:56 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number 120,138.82 Fund 100 GENERAL FUND 1,553.85 Fund 201 RESERVES DONATION FUND 20,685.15 Fund 415 PARK CAPITAL FUND 1,356.26 Fund 601 WATER Fund Totals: 143,734.08 Total For All Funds: CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 1/3Page: 02/06/2025 04:58 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36627 3662730,520.00 02/13/254998162024 COMPENSATION AND CLASSIFICATION STUDY 70% 41390.WSABDO LLP12/31/24100-41900-50300 30,520.00 Total For Check 36627 Check 36628 3662828,378.56 02/13/25227704908 PAY 1HORSESHOE BEND RESTORATIONBLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC01/27/25408-43100-50530 366289,573.90 02/13/25227704426 PAY 110200 CO RD 166 CULVERT REPLACEMENTBLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC01/27/25601-00000-16500 37,952.46 Total For Check 36628 Check 36629 366295,061.03 02/13/25227704864 PAY 7PAY REQUEST #7 - STIEG ROAD IMPROVEMENTSFEHN COMPANIES02/04/25100-00000-22205-087 5,061.03 Total For Check 36629 Check 36630 3663020,933.77 02/13/25023-058-13PARK PLANNING AND DESIGN DECEMBER 2024HKGI12/31/24415-45200-50300 20,933.77 Total For Check 36630 Check 36631 36631116,605.00 02/13/25202502052025 WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE PREMIUMLEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TRST02/04/25100-00000-15500 116,605.00 Total For Check 36631 Check 36632 36632283,410.00 02/13/25202412314TH QTR 2024 MAPLE GROVE WATER CONNECTION FEECITY OF MAPLE GROVE12/31/24601-00000-20800 283,410.00 Total For Check 36632 Check 36633 36633116,798.83 02/13/25221993RD QTR 2024 WATER USAGE CITY OF MAPLE GROVE12/31/24601-49400-50311 116,798.83 Total For Check 36633 Check 36634 36634122,440.15 02/13/25222564TH QTR 2024 WATER USAGE CITY OF MAPLE GROVE12/31/24601-49400-50311 122,440.15 Total For Check 36634 Check 36635 3663570,656.61 02/13/254411FINALIZED PERMITS DECEMBER 2024METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES12/31/24100-42400-50300 70,656.61 Total For Check 36635 Check 36636 3663630,613.59 02/13/250001180161WASTE WATER SERVICE JANUARY 2025METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO12/02/24602-49450-50312 3663630,613.59 02/13/250001181356WASTE WATER SERVICE FEBRUARY 2025METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO01/03/25602-49450-50312 61,227.18 Total For Check 36636 Check 36637 3663754,670.00 02/13/2520241231DECEMBER 2024 SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGEMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL12/31/24602-00000-20800 54,670.00 Total For Check 36637 Check 36638 3663820,206.44 02/13/252024Q4Q4 12-2024 MN STATE SURCHARGE REPORTMN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY12/31/24100-00000-20802 20,206.44 Total For Check 36638 Check 36639 366391,006,147.37 02/13/25227704426 PAY 20NE WATER SUPPLY - WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT PAY 20RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP12/26/24601-00000-16500 36639621,050.00 02/13/25227704426 PAY 21NE WATER SUPPLY - WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT PAY 21RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP02/05/25601-00000-16500 36639(50,307.37)02/13/25227704426 PAY 20NE WATER SUPPLY - WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT PAY 20RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP12/26/24601-00000-20610 36639(31,052.50)02/13/25227704426 PAY 21NE WATER SUPPLY - WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT PAY 21RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP02/05/25601-00000-20610 1,545,837.50 Total For Check 36639 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 2/3Page: 02/06/2025 04:58 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36640 3664031,530.70 02/13/252334658INDUSTRIAL NE PID 0111923110001 6190 20241122STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/31/24100-00000-22205 3664033,426.51 02/13/252334678STIEG ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 4864 20241122STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/31/24100-00000-22205-087 3664043,916.20 02/13/252334670CITY DOWNTOWN PARK 7229 20241122STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/31/24415-45200-50300 3664024,827.00 02/13/252334945WATER SUPPLY TREATMENT AND STORAGE FACILITY PRELIMINARY DESIGN 4426 20241122STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/31/24601-00000-16500 3664031,569.50 02/13/252334680NE CORCORAN WATER TOWER 5274 20241122STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/31/24601-49400-50300 165,269.91 Total For Check 36640 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 3/3Page: 02/06/2025 04:58 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 01/23/2025 - 02/13/2025 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number 308,006.29 Fund 100 GENERAL FUND 28,378.56 Fund 408 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 64,849.97 Fund 415 PARK CAPITAL FUND 2,134,456.88 Fund 601 WATER 115,897.18 Fund 602 SEWER Fund Totals: 2,651,588.88 Total For All Funds: Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6c. City Council Meeting: February 13, 2025 Prepared By: Natalie Davis McKeown Topic: Revision to Recorded Resolution 2024-92 for Hope Meadows (City File No. 24-025) Action Required: Decision 1. Request The final plat and planned unit development (PUD) plan for Hope Meadows was approved by the Council on September 12, 2024. An incomplete resolution for the final PUD plan approval was distributed in error with the initial agenda packet for the meeting. Planning staff later shared a corrected version which was the version that was approved at the City Council meeting. Unfortunately, the incomplete resolution remained in the mix of documents, and this was what was provided to the applicant to record with Hennepin County against the properties of the plat. Planning staff became aware of the error after reviewing the proof of recording from the applicant team which was received at the end of 2024. After conferring with the City Attorney on how best to address the error, City Council is asked to approve the attached resolution to replace the incorrect document that was filed with the County. The true and accurate version of Resolution 2024-92 approved by the City Council is included as Attachment B for future reference of the approvals and standards for the project. Upon approval, staff will send the updated resolution to the County for recording. 2. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2025-11 correcting the recorded resolution 2024-92 approving the final PUD plan for Hope Meadows. Attachments 1. Resolution 2025-11 A Resolution Correcting Recorded Resolution 2024-92. 2. Recorded Document No. 11317851 Resolution 2024-92 City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-11 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION CORRECTING RECORDED RESOLUTION 2024-92 APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLAN FOR “HOPE MEADOWS” FOR HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, LLC ON THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 116 AND COUNTY ROAD 30 (CITY FILE NO. 24-025) WHEREAS, Hope Community Development, LLC (“the applicant”) received approval on September 12, 2024 of a final planned unit development (PUD) plan for “Hope Meadows” for 45 townhomes, 4 detached villa lots, 1 existing church lot, 1 existing single-family home lot, and 3 outlots on the property legal described as follows: See Attachment A. WHEREAS, the applicant was required to record all approving resolutions for the project. WHERAS, the applicant provided proof of recording of Resolution 2024-92, approving the Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the project, referred to as Document No 11317851 by Hennepin County. WHEREAS, City staff determined that the version of Resolution 2024-92 which was recorded as Document No 11317851 is an incorrect previous draft of the Resolution that did not reflect the version of Resolution 2024-92 which received final approval from the Corcoran City Council, and Document No 11317851 was recorded in error. WHEREAS, a true and correct copy of the approved Resolution 2024-92 is attached to this Resolution as Attachment B. WHEREAS, the applicant and the City desire to correct this recording error by rendering Document No 11317851 null and void and replacing the same by recording a true and correct copy of the approved Resolution 2024-92, attached to this Resolution as Attachment B. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council hereby approves Resolution 2025-11 to be recorded against the property described in Attachment A, to make a record of the true and correct version of the approved Resolution 2024-92, which shall run with the land, and to render null and void the incorrectly recorded Document No 11317851. City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-11 Page 2 of 4 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Friedrich, Michelle Friedrich, Michelle Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 13th day of February 2025. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Deb Johnson – City Clerk City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-11 Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT A Lots 1 through 7, Block 1, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 1 through 7, Block 2, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 1 through 7, Block 3, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 1 through 7, Block 4, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 1 through 3, Block 5, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 1 through 6, Block 6, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 1 through 4, Block 7, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 1 through 4, Block 8, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 1 through 4, Block 9, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 1, Block 10, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 1, Block 11, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Outlots A, B, and C, HOPE MEADOWS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-11 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT B See following 10 pages. City of Corcoran September 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-92 Page 1 of 10 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLAN FOR “HOPE MEADOWS” FOR HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, LLC ON THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 116 AND COUNTY ROAD 30 (PID 11-119-23-14-0003, 11-119-23-14-0004, 11-119-23-14-0005, AND 11-119-23-11-0012) (CITY FILE NO. 24-025) WHEREAS, Hope Community Development, LLC (“the applicant”) requested approval of a final planned unit development (PUD) plan for “Hope Meadows” for 45 townhomes, 4 detached villa lots, 1 existing church lot, 1 existing single-family home lot, and 3 outlots on the property legal descried as follows: See Attachment A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a final PUD plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. A final PUD development plan is approved to create for 45 townhomes, 4 detached villa lots, 1 existing church lot, 1 existing single-family home lot, and 3 outlots for “Hope Meadows” in accordance with the plans and application materials received by the City on May 21, 2024, with additional materials received on June 24, 2024, July 8, 2024, July 10, 2024, July 23, 2024, July 29, 2024, August 5, 2024, August 7, 2024 August 8, 2024, August 12, 2024, August 13, 2024, August 21, 2024, and August 22, 2024, unless otherwise amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the following: a. The final plat for Hope Meadows (Resolution 2024-93). b. Vacation of the following: i. Previous perimeter drainage and utility easements that will be replaced by new proposed easements in the final plat. ii. Previously dedicated road right-of-way at Hunters Ridge and Oswald Farm Road that will be replaced with new right-of-way to allow a 90-degree intersection. 3. Approval is subject to the preliminary approvals (Resolution 2024-16 and Resolution 2024- 17) except as amended by Resolution 2024-91. 4. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of the plat approval in Resolution 2024-93. 5. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of the PUD Amendment approval in Resolution 2024-91. City of Corcoran September 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-92 Page 2 of 10 6. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s Memo, dated September 4, 2024. 7. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s Memo specific to stormwater, dated August 7, 2024. 8. The applicant shall continue to work with staff and the Three Rivers Park District to finalize the trail alignment, underpass, and corridor easements. 9. Before any site activity can occur, the following must be addressed: a. Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission approval is required prior to beginning any site activity. b. The grading plans must be approved by the City. c. The development contract or an early grading agreement must be executed and on file with the City. d. A financial guarantee must be submitted. 10. Lot 1, Block 11 is subject to future platting prior to redevelopment for a multi-family apartment building. a. Park dedication and Trunk Line Availability Charges (TLAC) based on the pre- developable acreage of the site will be due at the time of future re-platting. 11. The townhome HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance of: a. Landscaping and any irrigation in the common areas. b. Stormwater ponding. c. Landscaping within the right-of-way as required to meet the buffer yard requirements. d. Sidewalks. e. Private drives and parking areas. f. All common areas, including signage, lighting, and landscaping in those areas. 12. At least one more unique elevation shall be submitted (for a total of 5 different elevations) for the villas when the remaining villa lots are platted. 13. The developer and subsequent property owners are responsible for ongoing maintenance of properties within the development in compliance with Chapter 82.04, Subd. 7 (Nuisance Weeds) of the City Code to include the removal of invasive species such as Buckthorn. City of Corcoran September 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-92 Page 3 of 10 a. Noxious weeds must be removed as grading is completed. 14. An encroachment agreement must be approved by the City Attorney for improvements located within drainage and utility easements, such as the private drive, parking, patios, retaining walls, and signs, to be recorded with Hennepin County. 15. An encroachment and maintenance agreement must be approved by the City Attorney for landscaping within the unimproved right-of-way for the buffer yard area west of the townhomes. 16. Temporary blanket drainage and utility easement agreements are required over Outlot B and Outlot C reserved for future development. 17. All utility facilities shall be located underground. 18. Any development signage requires a sign permit and must comply with the standards in Section 84 of the City Code. 19. Barricades and signage indicating future extension of 100th Ave shall be installed, consistent with Section 945.010, Subd. 19 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 20. All plantings must be located outside of any Hennepin County easements or right-of- way. 21. The multi-family (market-rate and senior buildings) and commercial lots are subject to an 80% impervious surface limit. a. The impervious surface calculations shall be provided with the final PUD/plat for each site to confirm compliance. b. i. Each individual commercial site must comply with the 80% impervious surface maximum. FURTHER, prior to release of final plat for recording: 22. Park dedication shall be satisfied by cash-in-lieu of land. Park dedication will be based on the park dedication ordinance in place at the time the final plat is approved ($5,954 per unit). a. Park dedication is required based on the finding that the development will add 4 new single-family homes and 45 new townhomes to the City. b. Residents of the development will need access to nearby existing and future trails, that do not exist today, as guided by the Comprehensive Plan. 23. A wetland buffer establishment plan must be provided for review and approval by the City’s Wetland Specialist and address the following: City of Corcoran September 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-92 Page 4 of 10 a. Compliance with the City’s Buffer Vegetation Establishment Plan Policy. i. The proposed seeding mix. ii. Describe practices for site preparation, installation, maintenance, performance standards, and inspections. b. Certify the average buffer width and dimension the minimum and maximum buffer widths. c. The required wetland buffer monuments. i. Wetland buffer monuments are required at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer with a maximum spacing of 200’ along the wetland edge. d. Indicate the portion of the buffer and monument signs to be established with the first phase of development. e. Indicate the portion of the buffer and monument signs that will be addressed with a future phase and identify the threshold for such improvements. 24. A revised preliminary site plan. a. Indicate all applicable setbacks for buildings, parking lots, and drive aisles. Rounding up to the nearest foot is not permitted. i. Show a 50’ setback line along county roads and ensure all building pads comply with a minimum 50’ setback. b. Revise the development summary on the site plan to clarify 415 stalls are required and confirm the total number of actual stalls. c. At least two more pedestrian pathways must be shown within the landscaping islands of the commercial parking lot for a total of 6 pathways. 25. A revised final site plan. a. Parking stalls for the townhome guest parking must be dimensioned. i. Parking stalls for townhome guest parking must meet a minimum dimension of 9’ x 18’. ii. If more than 9 parking guest stalls are provided, up to 2 stalls may be marked for compact parking only with minimum dimensions of 8’ x 16’. iii. Landscaping at least three feet high shall be provided for parking areas with four or more stalls to screen vehicle headlights from adjacent residential lots and public streets. City of Corcoran September 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-92 Page 5 of 10 26. A revised preliminary landscaping plan shall be provided. a. An excel copy of the planting schedule shall be provided to staff. b. At least half of all plantings throughout the development must be of a native species as identified in the Northeast District Plan and Design Guidelines as part of the identified resiliency strategies for the development. c. At least 867 shrubs must be shown and included on the plant schedule. d. A buffer with shade trees, low shrubs or perennial flowers, and a decorative fence or masonry wall must be provided between all parking areas and the public sidewalk. i. A decorative fence is noted on the site plan, but it must be extended to run parallel to the parking area adjacent to the sidewalk along 100th Ave. 27. A revised final landscaping plan for phase 1 shall be provided. a. An excel copy of the planting schedule shall be provided to staff. b. Landscaping at least three feet high shall be provided for parking areas with four or more stalls to screen vehicle headlights from adjacent residential lots and public streets. c. Show the required buffer yard plantings within a 20’ width along the west boundary of the townhomes. i. An encroachment of up to 9.6’ is allowed within the unimproved right-of- way, but the width of the buffer should be accommodated on the townhomes site wherever possible. 28. The following documents must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and executed by the applicant and the City: a. Development Contract b. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement c. Buffer Yard Easement d. Encroachment Agreement(s) e. Encroachment and Maintenance Agreement for Landscaping Within the Right-of- Way f. Roadway Easement City of Corcoran September 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-92 Page 6 of 10 g. Temporary Drainage and Utility Easements h. Homeowners Association Documents (Townhomes) i. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (Villas) j. Hennepin County Multimodal (Trail) Easement Agreement 29. The Development Contract must be executed by the developer and the City and must be filed with the final plat. 30. Letter of credit must be in place and fees paid. FURTHER, that the following conditions must be met prior to issuance of building permits: 31. The applicant will work with staff to correct and finalize density exhibits for accurate plat monitoring reporting. 32. The applicant must file the final plat at Hennepin County within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. 33. The following documents must be recorded at Hennepin County and proof of recording shall be provided to the City: a. Development Contract b. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement c. Buffer Yard Easement d. Encroachment Agreement(s) e. Encroachment and Maintenance Agreement for Landscaping Within the Right-of- Way f. Roadway Easement g. Temporary Drainage and Utility Easements h. Homeowners Association Documents (Townhomes) i. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (Villas) j. Hennepin County Multimodal (Trail) Easement Agreement k. Approving Resolutions 34. Lot and corner monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. A financial guarantee shall be required to ensure installations per City requirements. The City of Corcoran September 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-92 Page 7 of 10 installation of the lot monuments according to the approved plan must be certified by a registered land surveyor. 35. Wetland buffer plantings must be installed unless an alternative timeline is approved by the City’s Wetland Specialist. a. A wetland buffer specialist from the City shall be present to observe the seeding of wetland buffer plantings. Seed varieties, amounts, equipment and cover crop species shall be inspected. b. Wetland buffer shall be seeded during the grading process when conditions are appropriate. c. Wetland buffers shall be seeded and/or planted as directed by the Corcoran Buffer Vegetation Establishment Plan. 36. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. a. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. b. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. 37. The City of Corcoran’s water system must be operational unless the City of Maple Grove provides approval of water service until the City of Corcoran’s water system is operational. a. Documentation of approval shall be provided to the City of Corcoran. FURTHER, the following must be submitted with each building permit application to confirm compliance with the PUD approvals and underlying Zoning Ordinance: 38. Colored building elevations that confirm the percentage of each siding material must be submitted with each building permit for review and approval. a. Each townhome building shall feature a broad array of colors, including earth tones, muted natural colors found in surrounding landscape or other colors consistent with the adjacent neighborhood. b. Villas and townhome buildings in proximity to each other shall not look alike in terms of the combination of color for siding, accent, and roofing materials. c. The home or townhome building under construction will be compared to the two homes or townhome buildings on each side of it and to the three homes or townhome buildings directly facing it. d. The townhomes and villa elevations shall be dimensioned to confirm minimum overhangs of at least 12”. e. Roofing materials on the single-family home must be confirmed. City of Corcoran September 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-92 Page 8 of 10 f. The villa elevations must comply with the design standards for single-family homes described in Section 1040.040, Subd. 8 of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise approved as part of the PUD flexibility. i. Each side elevation of the single-family villas shall include at least 1 window or door opening. ii. The side and rear elevations shall make a good faith effort to demonstrate that elements of the front elevation have been considered for incorporation on these elevations. iii. The north elevation of Lot 1, Block 9 and the south elevation of Lot 1, Block 9 shall incorporate a minimum of 2 different materials and/or styles compatible with the front elevation since these side elevations will be viables from a public street. iv. A maximum of 18” of the foundation wall may be exposed on any elevation. 39. Mechanical equipment must be shown on the building permit plans (including air condition units) and must be located in the side or rear yard. a. Mechanical equipment must be screened from off-site views utilizing a double row of landscaping, a privacy fence, or a wall that is at the same height as the structure it is screening or 6’, whichever is less to screen from off-site views. A chain link fence with slats shall not be accepted as screening. 40. The plans must indicate mailbox locations. Centralized mailbox locations shall be approved by the US Postal Service and proof of the approved locations must be provided to the City. FURTHER, that the following conditions must be met prior to reduction in financial guarantees for landscaping: 41. Any request for the City to inspect the required landscaping in order to reduce financial guarantees must be accompanied by recertification/verification of field inspection by the project Landscape Architect. A letter signed by the project Landscape Architect verifying plantings (including wetland and pond buffers) have been correctly seeded/installed in compliance with the plans and specifications will suffice. City of Corcoran September 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-92 Page 9 of 10 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of September 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jason (Jay) Tobin City of Corcoran September 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-92 Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENT A Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, HOPE PLACE SECOND ADDITION, and the vacated portions of Oswald Farm Road and Hunters Ridge accrued thereto. Parcel 2: Lot 1, Block 1, HOPE PLACE and the vacated portions of Hunters Ridge and Oswald Farm Road accrued thereto. Parcel 3: Outlot A, HOPE PLACE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 4: Outlot C, SERENITY MEADOWS and the vacated portions of Hunters Ridge and Oswald Farm Road accrued thereto. Page 1 of 4 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6d. City Council Meeting: February 13, 2025 Prepared By: Kendra Lindahl Topic: Notice of Decision for “Corcoran Industrial Northeast” Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) (PID 26-119- 23-13-0006) (City File No. 24-010) Action Required: Decision Review Deadline: N/A 1. Request Council is asked to adopt the Notice of Decision for Corcoran Industrial Northeast. Hempel Real Estate has submitted a request to initiate a mandatory EAW for the Corcoran Industrial Northeast industrial park to construct an 80-acre business park consisting of two buildings with a combined area of 540,000 square feet. Project components include construction of warehouse/office buildings, parking areas, access roads, trails/sidewalks, sewer/water utility improvements and stormwater ponds. The project area is currently utilized for agricultural production. The Minnesota Environmental Review Program rules require a mandatory EAW for new warehousing or light industrial facilities greater than 300,000 gross square feet in Corcoran. 2. Comments Received on the EAW Section 4410.1600 of the Environmental Rules states that comments received on the EAW shall address the accuracy and completeness of the material, potential environmental impacts that may warrant further investigation before the project is commenced and the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The 30-day EAW comment period ended on January 23, 2025. The response to the EAW comments was prepared and is attached as “Record of Decision.” This document includes all written comments submitted by governmental agencies as well as responses to their comments. Figure 1 - Location map Page 2 of 4 3. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making Under Minnesota Environmental Review Program Rules, the City is the governmental unit responsible for preparing this EAW and determining whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects. The purpose of the environmental review process is to provide usable information to the project proposer, governmental decision-makers and the public concerning the primary environmental effects of a proposed project. The EAW should identify measures to protect the environment that can later be imposed as conditions of approval in future development applications. If the EAW identifies significant environmental effects that cannot be mitigated or minimized, the City Council would order the preparation of an EIS. An EIS does not necessarily disclose more information about potential impacts; rather, its main purpose is to examine project alternatives and additional mitigative measures to lessen significant impacts identified in the EAW. Furthermore, an EIS is not a means to approve or deny a project but is an additional source of information to guide decisions. Very few projects move to the EIS stage because, in most cases, the EAW does an adequate job of describing potential impacts and identifying mitigative measures. The statutory standard for requiring an EIS is whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects – it is not whether the EAW has adequately disclosed information about potential impacts. Accordingly, if the City Council determines that the EAW does not disclose sufficient information about the potential impacts. The City Council would request additional information before deciding on the need for an EIS. In deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects that would warrant the preparation of an EIS, the City Council must consider the following factors (Minnesota Environmental Review Rules, Section 4410.1700, Subpart 7): a. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects; b. Cumulative potential effects. The RGU shall consider the following factors: whether the cumulative potential effect is significant, whether the contribution from the project is significant when viewed in connection with other contributions to the cumulative potential effect; the degree to which the project complies with approved mitigation measures specifically designed to address the cumulative Figure 2 - Sketch Plan for EAW Page 3 of 4 potential effect; and the efforts of the proposer to minimize the contributions from the project; c. The extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority. The RGU may rely only on mitigation measures that are specific and that can be reasonably expected to effectively mitigate the identified environmental impacts of the project; and d. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs. The City Council has three courses of action when reviewing an EAW. These actions include: 1. Require additional information to address possible environmental impacts not adequately discussed in the EAW; 2. Make a finding of “no need” for an EIS; or 3. Order an EIS. 4. Public Comment Period The Minnesota EQB advertises the availability of the document and the City transmits the EAW to a standard list of regional and state agencies for comment. The comment period for an EAW is 30 days. During this time period, the agencies and any member of the general public may comment on the EAW. The 30-day comment period ended on January 23, 2025. Comments submitted during the 30-day period should address the accuracy and completeness of the material contained in the EAW, potential impacts that may warrant further investigation before the project is commenced and the need for an EIS on the proposed project. After the close of the comment period, staff from Stantec and Landform prepared responses to the comments for review and consideration by the City Council. The response is included in the record of decision. The record of decision is intended to serve as the City’s findings of fact of a decision that an EIS does not need to be prepared for this project. The City received four comment letters. None of these letters stated that the EAW was inadequate or incomplete or identified the need for the preparation of an EIS. 5. Development Review Process If the City Council declares a finding of “no need” for an EIS, the developer could submit a formal development application that addresses any mitigation strategies identified in the EAW. Page 4 of 4 A formal application for this project has two steps: 1. Application for a site plan and preliminary plat (a variance may also be required). This requires a public hearing at the Planning Commission. Notice of the public hearing will be sent to landowners within 500 feet of the property, will be published in the newspaper and posted on the City website. The public hearing is an opportunity for comment on the development application. 2. Final plat. The final plat and development contract will be reviewed by the City Council. In addition to the City’s entitlement process, the developer would be required to obtain the permits listed in the EAW. 6. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the resolution declaring a finding of “no need” for an EIS, based on the review of the EAW dated November 2024. Approval of a finding of “no need” for an EIS requires a simple majority vote of the City Council. Attachments 1. Resolution 2025-10 Declaring a Finding of “No Need” for an Environmental Impact Statement 2. Record of Decision City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-10 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: RESOLUTION DECLARING FINDING OF “NO NEED” FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) BASED UPON THE REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) FOR “CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL NORTHEAST” PROPOSED BY HEMPEL REAL ESTATE FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS PID 26-119-23-13-0006 (CITY FILE NO. 24-010) WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the industrial park on December 12, 2024; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Environmental Review Program Rules 4410.4300, Subpart 14, the City of Corcoran, as the responsible governmental unit (RGU) submitted an EAW for the proposed project on December 17, 2024; and WHEREAS, the EAW was published in the December 24, 2024 edition of the EQB Monitor, which commenced the required 30-day public comment period that ended on January 23, 2025; and WHEREAS, the RGU received four comment letters that are incorporated by reference in the Record of Decision and all comments and recommendations received from reviewing agencies and other interested parties have been considered; and WHEREAS, responses were prepared for comment letters received and the response to comments are provided in the Record of Decision; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed project does not present a potential for environmental impacts of such significance that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) would be required; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Minnesota Rules, Section 4410.1700, the RGU shall base its decision regarding the need for an EIS on the information gathered during the EAW process, the comments received on the EAW and the criteria established by the EQB to determine whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects as provided in the Record of Decision; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does make the Negative Declaration on the need for an EIS for the proposed industrial/business park development, based on the Record of Decision and Response to Comments, which is hereby approved, adopted and incorporated herein. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Friedrich, Michelle Friedrich, Michelle Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-10 Page 2 of 2 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 13th day of February 2025. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Debra Johnson – City Clerk Responses to Comments, Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and Record of Decision for The Corcoran Industrial Northeast Environmental Assessment Worksheet Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) Proposer City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Kendra Lindahl Phone: (612) 638-0225 klindahl@landform.net Hempel Real Estate 10050 Crosstown Circle Suite 600 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Brandon Champeau Phone: (612) 432-5774 bchampeau@hempelcompanies.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 EAW NOTIFICATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND COMMENT PERIOD ............................................................ 1 COMMENTS RECEIVED .............................................................................................................................. 1 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS .................................................................................................................... 1 FINDINGS OF FACT ..................................................................................................................................... 7 RECORD OF DECISION ............................................................................................................................ 14 Appendix A: Comments Submitted to City of Corcoran Appendix B: City of Corcoran Negative EIS Need Declaration Resolution Appendix C: Corcoran Industrial Northeast Environmental Assessment Worksheet Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 1 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision INTRODUCTION The Corcoran Industrial Northeast development (herein referred to as “the Project”) proposes a light industrial park development on approximately 78.85 acres in the Northeast district of the City of Corcoran along County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 101 in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Project would create two industrial buildings, totaling approximately 540,000 square feet, and would include construction of public improvements such as access roads connecting to CSAH 101, pedestrian improvements, and stormwater management. The buildings would have a mixture of warehouse, manufacturing and other industrial uses and office space. The Project would include development on the current agricultural land and a portion of wetlands and woodland. Other components of the Project include the construction of filtration basins to meet stormwater requirements (water quality, volume, and rate). The Project is anticipated to be constructed in two phases beginning in the summer of 2025, based on market demand, and Phase I is anticipated to be complete in the summer of 2026. EAW NOTIFICATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND COMMENT PERIOD In accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1500, the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed and distributed to persons and agencies on the official Environmental Quality Board (EQB) distribution list. The EQB published notice of availability of the EAW in the EQB Monitor on December 24, 2024, initiating a 30-day comment period that concluded on January 23, 2025. A public notice was published in the local newspaper, the Crow River News. Appendix A includes copies of the comment letters and the EAW. COMMENTS RECEIVED The following comment letters or emails were sent to the City of Corcoran: Letter 1: City of Maple Grove Letter dated January 17, 2025, from Peter Vickerman, Planning Manager. Letter 2: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Letter dated January 23, 2025, from Melissa Collins, Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist. Letter 3: Metropolitan Council Letter dated January 23, 2025, from Angela R.Torres, Senior Manager Local Planning Assistance Email 1: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Email dated January 28, 2025 (late comment), from Chris Green, Project Manager Environmental Review RESPONSES TO COMMENTS The following information and clarifications are provided in response to all EAW comments received during the 30-day comment period. Comments responses are provided in italicized text. Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 2 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Letter 1: City of Maple Grove Comment 1: Comments relating to the County Road 101 Access location: We georeferenced the proposed concept plan, along with the Corcoran NE District Plan, and Maple Grove NW-610 Area Master Plan on the included map. Based on the proposed access point on County Road 101 for the northern road, we sketched in Arbor Ridge Parkway on the Maple Grove side. Based on FEMA floodplain shapefiles and internal Maple Grove estimated wetland area, the proposed location of the northern access road would create floodplain and wetland impacts on the Maple Grove side of County Road 101. We note that we have not fully engineered this road location and impacts may be greater than what is shown on this sketch. We note that the proposed access location is farther north than either the locations shown in master plans done for Maple Grove and Corcoran. The City of Maple Grove prefers to keep this access located where it was shown in the Maple Grove NW- 610 Master Plan as discussed and agreed to by Hennepin County. We have previously been negotiating with the property owners in Maple Grove regarding this access location and impacts to their properties. If the access is shifted north of what was previously approved in the master planning process, we request that the applicant for the Corcoran Industrial NE Concept be required to delineate the floodplain and wetlands that may be impacted in Maple Grove. Maple Grove can work with all parties on a more refined alignment of Arbor Ridge Parkway once these areas are delineated. If impacts are proposed, the applicant for the Corcoran Industrial NE Concept should be responsible for mitigating these impacts or should adjust their plan accordingly if the impacts are not acceptable. Response: The alignment (access road location) is consistent with Corcoran’s long-term planning including Corcoran’s Northeast District Plan that was funded and coordinated with Hennepin County. Moving the access to the south with the industrial project bisects the site which would significantly reduce the usable space for the property. Comment 2: Comments relating to utilities: Page 23, paragraph iii, Water Appropriation Would like clarification on what is meant by the statement that Maple Grove will serve as redundant water supply. The water supply interconnect between Maple Grove and northern half of Corcoran is scheduled to be closed when Corcoran’s new water plant becomes operational in 2025. Maple Grove will then only be obligated by agreement to serve the southern half (Downtown area) through another interconnect. No other future interconnects with Corcoran are planned at this point. Response: Clarification that “redundant” refers to emergency backup water supply. Comment 3: Comments relating to floodplain and drainage: Applicant should provide locations where stormwater will discharge off-site since this could directly impact neighboring communities. Issues with floodplain and overall drainage exist and should be resolved prior to project approvals. Response: Drainage would occur to the north to the floodplains and wetlands. All necessary permits and approvals would be obtained. There is no anticipated discharge to the east, across CSAH 101. Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 3 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Comment 4: Comments relating to traffic: North site access (which will align with Arbor Ridge Parkway as part of the Bella Woods development in MG) calls for NB/SB left and right turn lanes at the 2028 build scenario and also a full signal in the 2040 build scenario. The elevation of the floodplain will be critical to understand if widening 101 in this location has impacts to the floodplain and where that is mitigated. Stieg/101 build scenarios have no improvements needed with Corcoran project but Maple Grove and County have this identified as a fully controlled (signal, possibly RAB) intersection. Response: So noted. Refer to EAW Item 20c. Thank you for your comment. Letter 2: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comment 1: Page 11, Permits and Approvals. Table 6 should include a DNR Water Appropriation Permit, which is required if the water pumped exceeds 10,000 gallons in a day, and/or one million gallons in one year. Response: Water appropriation exceeding 10,000 gallons per day is not anticipated for the Project, but so noted. Thank you for the comment. Comment 2: Page 22, Stormwater. The DNR recommends that stormwater features be used to irrigate landscaping in the project area if infiltration is not feasible. Response: So noted. Thank you for the comment. Comment 3: We encourage local governments to request that project proposers who wish to significantly increase impervious surfaces develop a chloride management plan that outlines what BMP’s and strategies will be used to reduce chloride use within the project area. We also encourage cities, counties, and watershed to consider how they may participate in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan and provide public outreach to reduce the overuse of chloride. Response: So noted. A chloride management plan is required by the City of Corcoran’s Northeast District Guidelines and would be a part of the preliminary plat submittal. Thank you for the comment. Comment 4: Page 29, Rare Features. We recommend incorporating native plants and seed mixes into development landscaping to the greatest degree possible. Response: So noted. Native planting is required by the City of Corcoran’s Northeast District Guidelines. Thank you for the comment. Comment 5: Page 30, Rare Features. Even if there are no bat records listed nearby, all of Minnesota’s bats, including the federally endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), can be found throughout Minnesota. To minimize impacts to bats during pup rearing season, the DNR recommends that tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. Response: So noted. Thank you for the comment. Comment 6: Page 40, Dust and Odors. Please do not use products containing chloride for dust suppression in areas that drain to Public Waters. Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 4 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Response: So noted. A chloride management plan is required by the City of Corcoran’s Northeast District Guidelines and would be a part of the preliminary plat submittal. Thank you for the comment. Letter 3: Metropolitan Council Comment 1: Item 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience. The discussion of anticipated climate trends and associated mitigation measures are adequate. Met Council staff urges the project proposer to commit to including the identified mitigation measures and to consider additional actions such as using native plants for landscaping which can assist in stormwater management and reduce irrigation needs. Table 2 identifies a variety of hypothetical options to use to increase resilience to climate change, but none are committed to. This includes the suggestion of use of green infrastructure. However, in Section 8, Cover Types, the table reflects 0 acres of green infrastructure. We encourage the incorporation of green infrastructure (such as tree trenches and bioswales) for stormwater management and to support the successful growth of the 500 trees and other vegetation that will be planted. Response: So noted. Native planting is required by the City of Corcoran’s Northeast District Guidelines. Thank you for the comment. Comment 2: Item 8. Cover Types. Please incorporate a variety of native and/or climate adaptive tree species. Response: So noted. Native planting is required by the City of Corcoran’s Northeast District Guidelines. Thank you for the comment. Comment 3: Item 9. Permits and Approvals. Please include Minnesota Department of Health for well- sealing activities, should abandoned wells be found on the property. Response: So noted. Thank you for the comment. Comment 4: Item 10. Land Use. Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) The subject site is the northern one-quarter of TAZ #785. TAZ allocations are found in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan; the forecast for TAZ #785 includes growth of 7 households, no population, and 304 jobs during 2018 – 2040. Please contact and advise Met Council Research staff if more than 300 jobs are expected at this site. Met Council staff find the employment impact could be 400 – 500 jobs. However, the EAW proposes a significantly larger employment level (on p. 42); the larger employment level needs explanation. Response: The information available for preparation of the EAW is based on a “spec building”. As additional Project details are known, coordination would occur with the Metropolitan Council. Comment 5: Item 10. Land Use. Regional Parks and Trails The area between the proposed project area and the planned Diamond Lake Regional Trail to the west is undeveloped. Section 10 Land Use notes that “the surrounding property to the north, east and west is a mix of cropland, woods, wetlands, and undeveloped natural open space.” If this area is developed in the future, Met Council Parks and Trails staff encourage the City of Corcoran to develop safe bicycle and pedestrian connections to the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. Local and regional trails benefit residents and businesses alike, providing healthy recreation options and access to key local and regional destinations. Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 5 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Response: So noted. Pedestrian improvements are part of the proposed Project. EAW Item 10a.ii. mentions the planned off-road trail along the western property line. Comment 6: Item 11. Geology, Soils, Topography. If sod is being anticipated alongside below-grade water storage, please consider designing for stormwater capture and use to manage the volume of stormwater and reduce potable water needs for irrigation. In addition to selecting vegetation for soil suitability, please also consider their suitability for drought and future climate conditions. Response: No below grade water storage would occur. Potentially water use could come out of above grade ponds. In the City of Corcoran’s Northeast District Guidelines, native vegetation is required. Comment 7: Item 12. Water Resources. Wastewater Metropolitan Council Interceptor (9004-3B) runs from north to south through this site. The interceptor was built in 2016 and is a 27-inch Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Mortar (FRPM) Pipe. There are specific processes that must be followed before encroachment on our property or a direct connection to our Interceptor can be made. Before encroachment on our property an Encroachment Agreement will be required, and before direct connection to the Metropolitan Council Interceptor a Sewer Connection Permit will be required. Response: So noted. A Sewer Connection Permit would be completed and obtained from the MPCA before construction, as shown in Table 6. Permits and Approvals. Comment 8: Item 12. Water Resources. Wastewater A comprehensive plan amendment will be needed for Map 7-2 to show the change in serving the parcel to the west of the EAW site. The cited 15-inch sewer stub to serve the parcel to the west is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan (which shows 10-inch). The amendment will be required to be submitted and approved before the Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit application can be favorably acted on by the Met Council. Response: The comp plan service area is consistent with Map 7-2. Comment 9: Item 12. Water Resources. Water Supply Please include discussion of the site as if it were in a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA), as there is an area of the project site in which a new municipal well is planned (as identified in Section 10, Land Use and again in Section 12, Water Resources). Response: So noted. The DWSMA and wellhead protection area would be delineated, impacts would be assessed, and a wellhead protection plan would be completed prior to well construction. Local governments may implement zoning ordinances and land use controls within DWSMAs to limit activities that could contaminate water supply such as certain types of development, agricultural practices, and waste disposal. Comment 10: Item 12. Water Resources. Water Supply Please include discussion of climate change adaptation strategies, as the table earlier in the EAW indicates that they would be discussed there. At a minimum, please describe how increased intensity of rainfall paired with increased impervious surface will impact runoff, and how that will be managed. Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 6 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Response: So noted. Increased rainfall intensity and increased run-off volumes associated with climate change would be properly managed. Page 22 states that increased impervious surface would result in higher run-off rates, volumes, and pollutant loading, and that this would be mitigated through Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPS) such as wet ponds and sand filtration benches. Comment 11: Item 12. Water Resources. Water Supply As is possible, please carry out wetland replacement within the same sub-watershed to support a continuation of hydrologic function. Response: So noted. Thank you for the comment. Comment 12: Item 12. Water Resources. Surface Water Climate change is expected to increase the number of extreme rainfall and flooding events within the metro, and development in flood prone areas should be limited. Compensatory storage must be provided within the same floodplain being impacted. Filling of any floodplain should be limited. The developer should work closely with the watershed on this issue. Response: So noted. Thank you for the comment. Comment 13: Item 12. Water Resources. Surface Water Met Council staff encourage the developer to limit impacts to wetlands. If impacts must be made, we encourage the developer look within the same watershed/sub-watershed to do the wetland banking replacement. Response: So noted. Thank you for the comment. Comment 14: Item 14. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecological Resources. As noted above, in addition to native plant species, please use drought-tolerant and climate adaptive species in your plantings and seed mixes to reduce water irrigation demands and increase resilience. Response: So noted. Native planting is required by the City of Corcoran’s Northeast District Guidelines. Thank you for the comment. Comment 15: Item 18. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG/Carbon Footprint). The discussion of the project’s anticipated greenhouse gas emission is adequate and the inclusion of bike racks in the proposed site plan is appreciated. Met Council staff encourage the project proposer to consider additional mitigation measures such as providing electric vehicle ready charging infrastructure or incorporating solar panels into the project. Response: So noted. Thank you for the comment. Comment 16: Item 18. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG/Carbon Footprint). Thank you for incorporating trees and water-efficient operations in your list of mitigation strategies. Please also consider incorporating green infrastructure and drought tolerant plants and seed mixes to reduce irrigation needs, as water treatment is energy intensive. Response: So noted. The City of Corcoran’s Northeast District Guidelines require the use of three resiliency options such as electric charging stations, green rooftops, and landscaping with native species. Thank you for the comment. Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 7 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Email 1: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Comment 1: Wastewater. A table should be provided to identify the wastewater design flow estimates for each of the proposed light industrial use buildings and information should be provided on the composition of the wastewater that will be generated. Response: So noted. The Project would not exceed comp plan per acre use (refer to EAW Item 1212.b.i.). Thank you for the comment. Comment 2: Wastewater. The Feasibility Study Report in Appendix D indicates that the City Comprehensive Sewer Plan allocates 1,000 gpd per buildable acreage from the development for wastewater flow to the sanitary sewer system. The buildable acreage for the development should be identified in the draft EAW in the sections related to wastewater and wastewater infrastructure. Response: The level of detail provided in the EAW is commensurate with the concept plan. The Project would not exceed comp plan per acre use. Comment 3: Wastewater. A discussion should be provided that identifies the wastewater treatment facility that is connected to sanitary sewer that will serve the proposed development and the available treatment capacity of that wastewater treatment facility. Response: The receiving facility is MCES Metro. Comment 4: Wastewater. The draft EAW should identify dewatering that may be necessary for construction of the sanitary sewer system for the proposed project. Response: The dewatering would follow NPDES and all other applicable regulations. Comment 5: Watershed. Include information in the plan to use less chlorides on the increased impervious surface. Response: So noted. A chloride management plan is required by the City of Corcoran’s Northeast District Guidelines and would be a part of the preliminary plat submittal. Thank you for your comment. Comment 6: Permits. If a USACE 404 permit is required, an MPCA 401 Certification would be needed. Add to table 6. Response: So noted. Thank you for your comment. Comment 7: Water Resources. Include the type of impairments on the streams. There are TMDLs on all these impairments Response: So noted. Thank you for your comment. Comment 8: Water Resources. With every development comes an opportunity to do better than the stormwater development rules. In addition to designing to meet the minimum requirements of runoff, add additional BMPs to do better than the minimum. Adjust the design to remove impacts to wetlands would be the desired action. Response: So noted. Thank you for your comment. FINDINGS OF FACT Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 8 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Proposed Project The Project includes the development of approximately 78.85 acres within the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Project Area is located west of Brockton Lane North (CSAH 101), west of the City of Maple Grove, south of the City of Rogers, and southwest of the City of Dayton. The Project proposes two industrial buildings, totaling approximately 540,000 square feet, and construction of public improvements such as access roads connecting to CSAH 101, pedestrian improvements, and stormwater management. An EAW was prepared pursuant to Minnesota Rules Part 4410.4300, Subp. 14 (A) (2). The EAW and the respective comments have been reviewed in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 to determine if the project has potential for significant environmental effects. Site Description and Existing Conditions Under existing conditions, the Project Area consists of agricultural cropland, wetlands, undeveloped forest, and remnants of a former farmstead. A portion of the existing trees and shrubs would be removed to conduct site grading. A small portion of the existing wetlands would be impacted (filled) to construct the access roads and stormwater basins. The dilapidated buildings and remaining foundation associated within the farmstead would be demolished and any debris would be properly disposed of. Decision Regarding the Potential for Significant Environmental Effects Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, Subp. 7 lists four criteria that shall be considered in deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects. Those criteria and the City’s findings are presented below. Criteria A: Type, Extent, and Reversibility of Environmental Effects Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7 (A) indicates the first factor that the RGU must consider is the “type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects.” City of Corcoran’s findings are set forth below. 1. Cover Types. According to the University of Minnesota’s Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) 1- Meter Land Cover Dataset, wetland delineation data, and tree survey data, the Project area currently consists of the following [78.9 acres total]; cropland (35.9 acres), wetlands (20.7 acres), woodland (10.6 acres), grassland (9.8 acres), impervious surface (1.5 acres), and deep lakes (0.4 acres). As the design progresses the post-construction cover types would be refined. 2. Shorelands and Floodplains. The northern portion of the Project area is within the 100-year floodplain as outlined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The floodplain is associated with a Public Water Watercourse, Rush Creek (M-0062-004), located 600 feet north of the Project area. The proposed northern access road would trigger review and permitting due to the location relative to the floodplain. The stormwater management system would be constructed outside of the floodplain. 3. Land Use. The Project Area currently consists of cultivated cropland, several wetlands, woodland, grassland, and remnants of a former farmstead. Surrounding properties to the north, east and west are a mix of cropland, woodland, wetlands, and undeveloped natural open space. There are two single family homes to the east and an industrial facility to the south. The City of Corcoran has the Project area zoned for Light Industrial (I-1). The site is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) in phase I of the sewer staging plan. The City’s Comprehensive Plan shows a potential Greenway Corridor through the south portion of the property as well as an off-road trail along the western property line. On road trails are planned on CSAH 101. The development would include dedication of property and coordination with the City for a future well site along the western portion of the development. The proposed Project includes planned infrastructure improvements related to new Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision public streets, utilities, and surface water management and treatment, and is compatible with nearby land uses and zoning. Required setbacks, landscaping, and preservation of trees and wetlands in the north would buffer the site from surrounding land uses. 4. Geology and Soils. Grading of the site would be required during construction. Soils within the Project limits are not overly susceptible to erosion and are suitable for the proposed uses. Mitigation based on typical erosion control and sedimentation regulations would be provided. Some of the soils have water tables at or near the surface during parts of the growing season which would create limitations for infiltrative stormwater practices. 5. Water Quality. The Project would increase impervious surface area compared to existing conditions by constructing parking areas, buildings, roadways and pedestrian trails. Compliance with stormwater requirements would minimize and mitigate potential adverse effects on receiving waters. The Project would be designed to meet the stormwater quantity and quality standards and requirements set by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) and the City of Corcoran. The ECWMC reviews grading, stormwater, erosion & sediment control, and wetland buffer permits which regulate stormwater and floodplain management, erosion and sediment control. The City of Corcoran reviews wetland requirements and would ensure that the wetlands are not being impacted without adequate justification and mitigation per the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). In addition to the ECWMC requirements, the City’s zoning and stormwater management code plays a critical role in preserving natural resources. 6. Wetlands and Surface Waters. The Project design sought to avoid and minimize wetland impacts. In October 2021 the wetlands were delineated by Sambatek and on November 18th, 2021 they were approved by the City of Corcoran (Local Government Unit). Five wetlands were delineated within the Project area, totaling 21.1 acres. Based on the current Project concept plan, approximately 0.3 acres of wetland impacts are shown due to the proposed access roads and stormwater basins. Minimization of impacts to wetlands would continue to be evaluated as the Project design advances. It is not anticipated that that the proposed wetland impacts would require permitting under the Wetland Conservation Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. If necessary, wetland permitting would be obtained prior to impacts occurring, and all impacts would be regulated and mitigated. Total wetland impacts and site plan details may be subject to change. 7. Wastewater. The development intends to tie-in to the existing 30-inch trunk sewer located along the east property boundary adjacent o CSAH 101. In addition, one 15-inch sewer stub would be installed to the west property boundary in accordance with City development policy to allow future service to adjacent parcels. The development would limit the total wastewater volume to no more than 1,000 gallons per day per acre (gpd/acre), as this is the volume of wastewater that has been planned for in the design of the Master Sewer Plan included in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and approved by Met Council. 8. Hazardous Materials. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted for the Project area and identified an abandoned farmstead with associated solid debris, a 500-gallon aboveground storage tanks (AST), and a sealed well. A Phase II ESA was conducted to evaluate whether soil has been impacted by the Phase I findings. The findings of the Phase II ESA did not identify buried debris or significant impacts to the subsurface soils associated with the abandoned farmstead. However, buried debris and elevated concentrations of arsenic, cadmium and lead were identified in the northern portion of the Project area. A draft Response Action Plan (RAP) and Construction Contingency Plan (CCP) were prepared to provide procedures for the management of contaminated soils that would be encountered during redevelopment and to provide a plan to evaluate and manage other environmental issues that may arise. In addition to the ESA’s, a review of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) “What’s In My Neighborhood” databases were reviewed to identify active hazardous waste generators and sources of agricultural chemical soil/groundwater contamination within one mile of the Project area. No instances of existing contamination or potential environmental hazards were identified in the Project area. Any contaminated soils or potentially hazardous materials encountered during Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 10 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision construction would be handled and disposed of in accordance with MPCA and any other applicable requirements. 9. Ecological Resources. The Project area consists of a variety of habitats and vegetation including wetlands, cultivated fields, woodland, and grassland. A review of the DNR Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) database was conducted to determine if any rare natural features could be impacted by the Project. Correspondence dated October 11, 2024 (Correspondence MCE No. 2024-00852) indicated that the proposed Project would not negatively affect any known occurrences of rare features. The DNR recommended that tree removal be avoided from June 1st through August 15th to avoid negative impacts to federally listed endangered bats. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool was used to identify other potential sensitive resources near the Project. The IPaC identifies the whooping crane (Grus Americana), the salamander mussel (Simpsonaias ambrigua), the western regal fritillary (Argynnis idalia occidentalis), and the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) as potentially being within the vicinity of the Project Area. Suitable habitat for the whooping crane, salamander mussel and western regal fritillary are not present in the Project area and thus no impacts are anticipated. The removal and damage of vegetation could result in habitat loss for the monarch butterfly. A large stick nest with the potential to support a nesting pair of bald eagles was identified near the northern Project boundary. The nest appeared to be inactive during an October 2024 field visit. The nest is located approximately 900 feet from the Project disturbance area and all Project activities would avoid the regulated 660 foot buffer area required by USFWS guidelines. 10. Historic Resources. Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (MnSHPO) previous survey data, the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) Portal, the Minnesota State Historic Inventory Portal and archival resources were reviewed by Stantec to identify cultural resources within 1 mile of the Project area. Based on the results of this search, Stantec recommends a finding of No Historic Properties Affected for the Project. Stantec did not identify above-ground historic resources listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The abandoned farmstead within the Project area lacks sufficient integrity and significance to be listed. Based on the preliminary desktop review, a historic architectural property survey was not recommended. If the Project requires federal financial assistance or a federal permit, a Section 106 review and MnSHPO consultation would be required. 11. Visual Resources. Any change from undeveloped to developed land would have an impact on the visual look of the property, but the Corcoran Industrial Northeast Development is not anticipated to have an impact on specific scenic views or vistas within the community. The Project is not anticipated to produce any intense lights (glare) or include industries that would emit vapor plumes. The Project would adhere to the City of Corcoran’s ordinance requirements including building height and from, landscaping, screening, lighting, etc. The Project area is also subject to the Corcoran Northeast District Guidelines, which encourages site layout and landscaping to be designed to work with the existing topography, wooded area, wetlands, and natural viewsheds and corridors. Wetland impacts and tree removal would be minimized to the extent possible, particularly to the wetlands and wooded areas in the north and south. Additional vegetative screening may be added, where appropriate. 12. Air. Industrial facilities may utilize natural gas and electric-powered equipment, which would emit low levels of greenhouse gas emissions, hazardous air pollutants, and criteria pollutants. Generally, air emissions associated with light industrial uses are relatively insignificant and the facilities would not require an air permit. The future industrial user of the Project area would be responsible for determining air permit applicability or exemption determinations bases on the equipment to be installed prior to construction. Minor emissions generated from construction equipment would occur during the construction phase. Contractors would be responsible for ensuring equipment is properly maintained and not contributing to excess emissions. Following Project completion, vehicle-related air emissions in the area - Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 11 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision including carbon monoxide levels - would see a relatively small increase due to the increase in traffic to and from the site. The Project would not generate significant dust or odors during construction or operation. Odors generated during construction would be mitigated by maintenance of the construction equipment to the manufacturers’ specifications and by using appropriate fuel additives when necessary. Grading and construction would temporarily generate dust. BMPs and other standard construction methods would be used to reduce construction impacts such as intermittent applications of water to exposed soils as needed to reduce dust during dry weather. 13. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG)/ Carbon Footprint. Average annual GHG emissions were calculated for construction and operation phases of the Project per Minnesota Environmental Quality Board’s (EQB’s) EAW Guidance (dated June 2024). Three types of emissions were evaluated; direct emissions released from the property (with subcategories to account for both construction and operation phases as well as mobile and stationary sources), emissions associated with offsite generation of purchased electricity, and emissions from offsite provision of waste management. 14. Noise. A noise study was not completed for the preparation of this EAW. Given that the Project proposes light industrial development consisting of office and warehouse uses, it is not anticipated that the Project would generate operational noise that would exceed state noise standards. Project construction would result in a temporary increase in noise levels. The different phases of development would result in varying noise levels depending on the amount of construction that occurs simultaneously, the time of operation, and the distance between construction equipment and receptors. Construction would be limited to daytime hours consistent with the City’s construction and noise ordinances. Construction equipment would be properly muffled and maintained in working order. 15. Transportation. A Traffic Impact Study was completed for a No-Build and Build condition for two design years, 2028, the estimated year after full completion of the Project, and 2040 as the long- range planning horizon. The study evaluated weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts at the following intersections: CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway, CSAH 1010/north access/future street, CSAH 101/south access, CSAH 101/Stieg Road, and CSAH 101/CSAH 30. The study suggests that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic from the development. Mitigation measures recommended include construction of northbound and southbound left and right turn lanes on CSAH 101, construction of eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30, and installation of traffic signal controls at the CSAH 101/north access/future street intersection. Criteria B: Cumulative Potential Effects Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7 (B) indicates the second factor the City must consider is “whether the cumulative potential effect is significant; whether the contribution from the project is significant when viewed in connection with other contributions to the cumulative potential effect; the degree to which the project complies with approved mitigation measures specifically designed to address the cumulative potential effect; and the efforts of the proposer to minimize the contributions from the project.” The City’s findings are set forth below. The potential cumulative effects on public infrastructure would include municipal water supply systems and sanitary sewer conveyance and treatment systems. Water supply for the Project would be consistent with the water supply planned for the Northeast Corcoran area. Sewer and watermain improvements would be required and the Proposer would limit the total wastewater volume to no more than 1,000 gpd/acre, consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Future developments in the area would be regulated through the City of Corcoran land use and zoning policies, thus adverse cumulative impacts are not anticipated. The Proposer would dedicate land for a future City well to serve the water needs of future development within the City. Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 12 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision The potential cumulative effects on water resources includes an increase in impervious surfaces due to development in the surrounding area. All future developments would be required to implement stormwater BMPs to mitigate stormwater run-off impacts in accordance with all City, ECWMC, and MPCA approval and permitting requirements. Thus, adverse cumulative impacts to water quality and quantity are not anticipated. Potential wetland impacts as a result of the Project would be confirmed during final design and permitting. Planned development in the area may also impact wetlands. Adverse cumulative impacts to wetlands are not anticipated given the federal and state regulations that mandate avoidance, minimizations and mitigation requirements for wetland impacts. Agricultural land would be converted to industrial uses and planned developments in the area may also convert agricultural land to other land uses. The City of Corcoran guides development through the City’s land use plan and zoning codes. The Project is consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which identifies the Project area and adjacent properties for future light industrial development. The City of Corcoran through their land use policies and zoning requirements, regulates future development and can protect agricultural land from future development as appropriate. Therefore, adverse cumulative impacts to agricultural land are not anticipated. A Traffic Impact Study for the Project was completed that incorporated future traffic growth and recommended mitigation measures to address traffic impacts. Future developments to the surrounding area that are anticipated to increase traffic congestion would also be required to complete a traffic impact study and identify mitigation measures to address impacts. Therefore, adverse cumulative impacts related to traffic congestion are not anticipated. Criteria C: Extent to Which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7 (C) indicates the third factor the City must consider is the “extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority.” The City’s findings are set forth below. Environmental effects on water quality, wetlands, and traffic are subject to additional approvals and/or mitigation through requirements of local, state, and federal regulations, ordinances, management plans, and permitting processes. The following permits and approvals are required for the Project addressed under the EAW. These processes would provide additional opportunities to require mitigation. Potential environmental effects associated with this Project would be mitigated in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. The City of Corcoran therefore finds that potential environmental effects of the Project are less than significant and “subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority.” Table 6. Permits and Approvals Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit To be completed, if required State Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit To be completed Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 13 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Unit of Government Type of Application Status MPCA Sewer Extension Permit To be completed MPCA Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup and/or Brownfield Programs Response Action Plan (RAP) and Construction Contingency Plan (CCP) Approval Minnesota Department of Health Watermain Extension Permit To be completed Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI) 1 Plumbing Review Permit To be completed County Hennepin County County Road Access Permit To be completed Hennepin County Right of Way Permit To be completed Local City of Corcoran EAW / EIS Need Decision Draft prepared City of Corcoran Wetland Conservation Act (Boundary Approval/Replacement Plan) To be completed City of Corcoran Preliminary and Final Plat To be completed City of Corcoran Site Plan To be completed City of Corcoran Variance To be completed City of Corcoran Erosion Control, Grading, and Stormwater Permit To be completed City of Corcoran Building Permits To be completed Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Stormwater, Erosion Control, and Site Plan Approval To be completed 1 Permit would be coordinated by Proposer with DOLI during City Building Permit review. Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 10-20, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No.22. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 21. Criteria D: Extent to Which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7 (D) indicates the final factor the RGU must consider is the “extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs.” The City of Corcoran’s findings are set forth below. Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW 14 Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision 1. The proposed Project design, plans, EAW, related studies, and mitigation measures apply knowledge, approaches, standards, and best management practices gained from previous experience and projects that have, in general, successfully mitigated potential offsite environmental effects. 2. The EAW, in conjunction with this document, contains or references the known studies that provide information or guidance regarding environmental effects that can be anticipated and controlled. 3. Other projects studied under environmental reviews in Minnesota have included studies and mitigation measures comparable to those included in this EAW. 4. There are no elements of the Project that pose the potential for significant environmental effects that cannot be addressed by the Project design, assessment, permitting and development processes, and by ensuring conformance with regional and local plans. 5. The environmental effects of this development can be anticipated and controlled by the permit application and review processes of the state and local regulatory authorities. 6. Considering the results of environmental review and permitting processes for similar projects, the City of Corcoran finds that the environmental effects of the Project can be adequately anticipated and controlled. RECORD OF DECISION Based on the EAW, the Response to Comments and the Findings of Fact, City of Corcoran concludes the following: 1. All requirements for environmental review of the Project have been met. 2. The EAW and the permit development processes related to the Project have generated information which is adequate to determine whether the Project has the potential for significant environmental effects. 3. Areas where potential environmental effects have been identified have included proper mitigative responses to be included within the final design of the Project. Mitigation will be required to be provided where impacts are expected to result from Project construction, operation, or maintenance. Mitigative measures will be required to be incorporated into Project design and have been or will be coordinated with state and federal agencies during the applicable permit process. 4. Based on the criteria in Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, the Project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5. City of Corcoran makes a “Negative Declaration;” and 6. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required. Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW O Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Appendix A: Comment Letters To: Natalie Davis McKeown, Planner, City of Corcoran From: Peter Vickerman, Planning Manager, City of Maple Grove Date: January 17, 2025 Subject: Corcoran Industrial NE EAW Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide commentary on the Corcoran Industrial NE EAW. Comments relating to the County Road 101 Access location: We georeferenced the proposed concept plan, along with the Corcoran NE District Plan, and Maple Grove NW-610 Area Master Plan on the included map. Based on the proposed access point on County Road 101 for the northern road, we sketched in Arbor Ridge Parkway on the Maple Grove side. Based on FEMA floodplain shapefiles and internal Maple Grove estimated wetland area, the proposed location of the northern access road would create floodplain and wetland impacts on the Maple Grove side of County Road 101. We note that we have not fully engineered this road location and impacts may be greater than what is shown on this sketch. We note that the proposed access location is farther north than either the locations shown in master plans done for Maple Grove and Corcoran. The City of Maple Grove prefers to keep this access located where it was shown in the Maple Grove NW-610 Master Plan as discussed and agreed to by Hennepin County. We have previously been negotiating with the property owners in Maple Grove regarding this access location and impacts to their properties. If the access is shifted north of what was previously approved in the master planning process, we request that the applicant for the Corcoran Industrial NE Concept be required to delineate the floodplain and wetlands that may be impacted in Maple Grove. Maple Grove can work with all parties on a more refined alignment of Arbor Ridge Parkway once these areas are delineated. If impacts are proposed, the applicant for the Corcoran Industrial NE Concept should be responsible for mitigating these impacts or should adjust their plan accordingly if the impacts are not acceptable. Comments relating to utilities: Page 23, paragraph iii, Water Appropriation Would like clarification on what is meant by the statement that Maple Grove will serve as redundant water supply. The water supply interconnect between Maple Grove and northern half of Corcoran is scheduled to be closed when Corcoran’s new water plant becomes operational in 2025. Maple Grove will then only be obligated by agreement to serve the southern half (Downtown area) through another interconnect. No other future interconnects with Corcoran are planned at this point. Comments relating to floodplain and drainage: Applicant should provide locations where stormwater will discharge off-site since this could directly impact neighboring communities. Issues with floodplain and overall drainage exist and should be resolved prior to project approvals. Comments relating to traffic: North site access (which will align with Arbor Ridge Parkway as part of the Bella Woods development in MG) calls for NB/SB left and right turn lanes at the 2028 build scenario and also a full signal in the 2040 build scenario. The elevation of the floodplain will be critical to understand if widening 101 in this location has impacts to the floodplain and where that is mitigated. Stieg/101 build scenarios have no improvements needed with Corcoran project but Maple Grove and County have this identified as a fully controlled (signal, possibly RAB) intersection Attachments: Corcoran Industrial NE Concept Access Issues Esri, HERE, iPC, Three Rivers Park District, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS Proposed intersection location creates floodplain & wetland impacts in Maple Grove Proposed intersection location in Maple Grove NW-610 Area Master Plan Proposed intersection location in Corcoran NE District Plan Corcoran Industrial NE Concept County Road 101 Access Issues FEMA Flood Zone 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD A AE AH 1 inch equals 300 feet 1/2 Mile Spacing from Dayton Parkway Division of Ecological and Water Resources Transmitted by Email Region 3 Headquarters 1200 Warner Road Saint Paul, MN 55106 January 23, 2025 Kendra Lindahl, AICP City Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55304 Dear Kendra Lindahl, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Corcoran Industrial Northeast Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the project located within the City of Corcoran in Hennepin County. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) respectfully submits the following comments for your consideration: 1. Page 11, Permits and Approvals. Table 6 should include a DNR Water Appropriation Permit, which is required if the water pumped exceeds 10,000 gallons in a day, and/or one million gallons in one year. The DNR General Permit for Temporary Appropriation, with its lower permit application fee and reduced time for review, may be used for the dewatering if the dewatering volume is less than 50 million gallons and the time of the appropriation is less than one year. A DNR Water Appropriation Permit can be applied for through the Minnesota DNR Permitting and Reporting System. 2. Page 22, Stormwater. The DNR recommends that stormwater features be used to irrigate landscaping in the project area if infiltration is not feasible. The reuse of stormwater for irrigation would conserve valuable groundwater and reduce the volume of stormwater and stormwater pollution flowing downstream of the site. 3. Page 22, Stormwater. The planned increase in impervious surfaces will also increase the amount of road salt used in the project area. Chloride released into local lakes and streams does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, potentially reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Rush Creek is already impaired for chloride. Consider promoting local business and city participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. There are a variety of classes available for road applicators, sidewalk applicators, and property managers. More information and resources can be found at this website. Many winter maintenance staff who have attended the Smart Salting training — both from cities and counties and from private companies — have used their knowledge to reduce salt use and save money for their organizations. We encourage local governments to request that project proposers who wish to significantly increase impervious surfaces develop a chloride management plan that outlines what BMP’s and strategies will be used to reduce chloride use within the project area. We also encourage cities, counties, and watershed to consider how they may participate in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan and provide public outreach to reduce the overuse of chloride. Here are some educational resources for residents as well as a sample ordinance regarding chloride use. 4. Page 29, Rare Features. We recommend incorporating native plants and seed mixes into development landscaping to the greatest degree possible. 5. Page 30, Rare Features. Even if there are no bat records listed nearby, all of Minnesota’s bats, including the federally endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), can be found throughout Minnesota. To minimize impacts to bats during pup rearing season, the DNR recommends that tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. 6. Page 40, Dust and Odors. Please do not use products containing chloride for dust suppression in areas that drain to Public Waters. Thank you again for the opportunity to review this document. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Melissa Collins Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist | Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources CC: Brandon Champeau, Hempel Real Estate Metropolitan Council (Regional Office & Environmental Services) 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P 651.602.1000 | F 651.602.1550 | TTY 651.291.0904 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer January 23, 2025 Kendra Lindahl, City Planner City of Corcoran 8200 Country Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 RE: City of Corcoran Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) – Corcoran Industrial Northeast Metropolitan Council Review 23037-1 Metropolitan Council District 1 Dear Kendra Lindahl: The Metropolitan Council received the EAW for the Corcoran Industrial Northeast project in Corcoran on December 16, 2024. The proposed project site is located on the west side of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 101 boundary with Maple Grove and bordered by Rogers to the north, and Dayton to the northeast. The proposed development consists of 78.85 acres of light industrial park. The proposed project would create two industrial buildings totaling 540,000 square feet. This project would also include access roads connecting to CSAH 101, pedestrian improvements, and stormwater management. The staff review finds that the EAW is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and does not raise major issues of consistency with Met Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional purposes. We offer the following comments for your consideration. Item 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience (MacKenzie Young-Walters, 651-602-1373, Jen Kader, 651-602-1114) The discussion of anticipated climate trends and associated mitigation measures are adequate. Met Council staff urges the project proposer to commit to including the identified mitigation measures and to consider additional actions such as using native plants for landscaping which can assist in stormwater management and reduce irrigation needs. Table 2 identifies a variety of hypothetical options to use to increase resilience to climate change, but none are committed to. This includes the suggestion of use of green infrastructure. However, in Section 8, Cover Types, the table reflects 0 acres of green infrastructure. We encourage the incorporation of green infrastructure (such as tree trenches and bioswales) for stormwater management and to support the successful growth of the 500 trees and other vegetation that will be planted. Item 8. Cover Types (Jen Kader, 651-602-1114) Please incorporate a variety of native and/or climate adaptive tree species. Item 9. Permits and Approvals (Jen Kader, 651-602-1114) Please include Minnesota Department of Health for well-sealing activities, should abandoned wells be found on the property. Page - 2 | January 23, 2025 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Item 10. Land Use (Todd Graham 651-602-1322, Colin Kelly, 651-602-1361) Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) The subject site is the northern one-quarter of TAZ #785. TAZ allocations are found in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan; the forecast for TAZ #785 includes growth of 7 households, no population, and 304 jobs during 2018 – 2040. Please contact and advise Met Council Research staff if more than 300 jobs are expected at this site. Met Council staff find the employment impact could be 400 – 500 jobs. However, the EAW proposes a significantly larger employment level (on p. 42); the larger employment level needs explanation. Regional Parks and Trails There are two planned units of the Regional Parks and Trails System in the vicinity (i.e., within 1/2 mile) of the proposed project area. Rush Creek and Diamond Lake regional trails are both approximately 0.2-mile from the project area, Rush Creek to the north and Diamond Lake to the west. Both regional trails have Met Council approved long-range plans; Rush Creek’s is from 2007 and Diamond Lake’s is from 2022. Three Rivers Park District is the regional park implementing agency for both regional trails. The EAW acknowledges the Rush Creek Regional Trail in Section 21. Cumulative Potential Effects: “The project is also planned to include a connection to the Rush Creek Regional Trail, recreational area, internal roads, parks, and stormwater features.” Met Council Parks and Trails staff appreciate the plan to connect the proposed development to the planned regional trail to the north. Existing transportation infrastructure – Brockton Lane North / Highway 101 and its right-of- way – may help facilitate this connection. The area between the proposed project area and the planned Diamond Lake Regional Trail to the west is undeveloped. Section 10 Land Use notes that “the surrounding property to the north, east and west is a mix of cropland, woods, wetlands, and undeveloped natural open space.” If this area is developed in the future, Met Council Parks and Trails staff encourage the City of Corcoran to develop safe bicycle and pedestrian connections to the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. Local and regional trails benefit residents and businesses alike, providing healthy recreation options and access to key local and regional destinations. Item 1. Geology, Soils, Topography (Jen Kader, 651-602-1114) If sod is being anticipated alongside below-grade water storage, please consider designing for stormwater capture and use to manage the volume of stormwater and reduce potable water needs for irrigation. In addition to selecting vegetation for soil suitability, please also consider their suitability for drought and future climate conditions. Item 12. Water Resources (Roger Janzig, 651-602-1119, Jen Kader, 651-602-1114, Maureen Hoffman, 651-602-8026) Wastewater Metropolitan Council Interceptor (9004-3B) runs from north to south through this site. The interceptor was built in 2016 and is a 27-inch Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Mortar (FRPM) Pipe. There are specific processes that must be followed before encroachment on our property or a direct connection to our Interceptor can be made. Before encroachment on our property an Encroachment Agreement will be required, and before direct connection to the Metropolitan Council Interceptor a Sewer Connection Permit will be required. • To obtain a Sewer Connection Permit or an Encroachment Agreement Application, contact Tim Wedin, Interceptor Engineering Assistant Manager (651-602-4571) at the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. • To assess the potential impacts to our interceptor system; prior to initiating this project, preliminary plans should be sent to Tim Wedin. Page - 3 | January 23, 2025 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL A comprehensive plan amendment will be needed for Map 7-2 to show the change in serving the parcel to the west of the EAW site. The cited 15-inch sewer stub to serve the parcel to the west is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan (which shows 10-inch). The amendment will be required to be submitted and approved before the Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit application can be favorably acted on by the Met Council. The above should be noted in Item 9 of the EAW: Permits and Approvals Required. Water Supply Please include discussion of the site as if it were in a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA), as there is an area of the project site in which a new municipal well is planned (as identified in Section 10, Land Use and again in Section 12, Water Resources). Please include discussion of climate change adaptation strategies, as the table earlier in the EAW indicates that they would be discussed there. At a minimum, please describe how increased intensity of rainfall paired with increased impervious surface will impact runoff, and how that will be managed. As is possible, please carry out wetland replacement within the same sub-watershed to support a continuation of hydrologic function. Surface Water Climate change is expected to increase the number of extreme rainfall and flooding events within the metro, and development in flood prone areas should be limited. Compensatory storage must be provided within the same floodplain being impacted. Filling of any floodplain should be limited. The developer should work closely with the watershed on this issue. Met Council staff encourage the developer to limit impacts to wetlands. If impacts must be made, we encourage the developer look within the same watershed/sub-watershed to do the wetland banking replacement. Item 14. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecological Resources (Jen Kader, 651-602-1114) As noted above, in addition to native plant species, please use drought-tolerant and climate adaptive species in your plantings and seed mixes to reduce water irrigation demands and increase resilience. Item 18. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG)/Carbon Footprint (MacKenzie Young-Walters, 651-602-1373, Jen Kader, 651-602-1114) The discussion of the project’s anticipated greenhouse gas emission is adequate and the inclusion of bike racks in the proposed site plan is appreciated. Met Council staff encourage the project proposer to consider additional mitigation measures such as providing electric vehicle ready charging infrastructure or incorporating solar panels into the project. Thank you for incorporating trees and water-efficient operations in your list of mitigation strategies. Please also consider incorporating green infrastructure and drought tolerant plants and seed mixes to reduce irrigation needs, as water treatment is energy intensive. Page - 4 | January 23, 2025 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL This concludes the Council’s review of the EAW. The Council will not take formal action on the EAW. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Freya Thamman, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1750 or via email at freya.thamman@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Angela R. Torres, AICP, Senior Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT - Metro Division Judy Johnson, Metropolitan Council District 1 Freya Thamman, Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Reviews Coordinator N:\CommDev\LPA\Communities\Corcoran\Letters\Corcoran 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW OK w Comments 23037-1.docx From:Green, Chris (MPCA) To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:Corcoran EAW Comments Date:Tuesday, January 28, 2025 9:33:26 AM Hi Kendra, Looks like we had some comments come in late. It appears this if outside of the comment period, but I thought I should relay regardless. Wastewater: 1. A table should be provided to identify the wastewater design flow estimates for each of the proposed light industrial use buildings and information should be provided on the composition of the wastewater that will be generated. 2. The Feasibility Study Report in Appendix D indicates that the City Comprehensive Sewer Plan allocates 1,000 gpd per buildable acreage from the development for wastewater flow to the sanitary sewer system. The buildable acreage for the development should be identified in the draft EAW in the sections related to wastewater and wastewater infrastructure. 3. A discussion should be provided that identifies the wastewater treatment facility that is connected to sanitary sewer that will serve the proposed development and the available treatment capacity of that wastewater treatment facility. 4. The draft EAW should identify dewatering that may be necessary for construction of the sanitary sewer system for the proposed project. Watershed: Include information in the plan to use less chlorides on the increased impervious surface. Minnesota Chloride Management Plan Rush Creek is at high risk (>= 120mg/L) for chloride impairment. Other nearby streams are already impaired. Designing drainage areas to reduce icy areas: items could include: Identify where snow piles will be and make sure that they won’t melt and refreeze across walk areas. Route runoff from roof to BMPs so icy areas aren’t created. Design where trees (species and location) would be most advantageous. An example: Planting trees so the winter sun won’t be blocked from melting icy walkway areas during the winter will reduce chloride use. Permitting: If a USACE 404 permit is required, an MPCA 401 Certification would be needed. Add to table 6. Include the type of impairments on the streams. There are TMDLs on all these impairments. Appendix A does include the impairments, but it would be better to include this in the main portion of the document. Water body name Water body type AUID Affected designated use Pollutant or stressor Year added to List Year TMDL plan approved EPA category TMDL ID Rush Creek Stream 07010206-528 Aquatic Life Benthic macroinvertebrates bioassessments 2014 2017 4A PRJ06872-001 Rush Creek Stream 07010206-528 Aquatic Life Dissolved oxygen 2010 2017 4A PRJ06872-001 Rush Creek Stream 07010206-528 Aquatic Recreation Escherichia coli (E. coli)2010 2017 4A PRJ06872-001 Rush Creek Stream 07010206-528 Aquatic Life Fish bioassessments 2002 2017 4A PRJ06872-001 Rush Creek, South Fork Stream 07010206-732 Aquatic Life Fish bioassessments 2014 2017 4A PRJ06872-001 Rush Creek, South Fork Stream 07010206-732 Aquatic Life Benthic macroinvertebrates bioassessments 2014 2017 4A PRJ06872-001 Rush Creek, South Fork Stream 07010206-732 Aquatic Life Chloride 2014 2016 4A PRJ06468-001 Rush Creek, South Fork Stream 07010206-732 Aquatic Recreation Escherichia coli (E. coli)2010 2017 4A PRJ06872-001 Rush Creek, South Fork Stream 07010206-760 Aquatic Life Fish bioassessments 2014 2017 4A PRJ06872-001 Rush Creek, South Fork Stream 07010206-760 Aquatic Life Benthic macroinvertebrates bioassessments 2014 2017 4A PRJ06872-001 With every development comes an opportunity to do better than the stormwater development rules. In addition to designing to meet the minimum requirements of runoff, add additional BMPs to do better than the minimum. Adjust the design to remove impacts to wetlands would be the desired action. Chris Green Project Manager Environmental Review Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 504 Fairgrounds Rd Suite 200 Marshall MN 56258-1688 Office: 507-476-4258 Cell: 507-696-9718 Chris.Green@state.mn.us NOTICE: This email (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. This email may be confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply back to the sender that you have received this message in error, then delete it. Thank you. Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW P Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Appendix B: City of Corcoran Negative EIS Need Declaration Resolution Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW Q Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision Appendix C: Corcoran Industrial Northeast Environmental Assessment Worksheet Corcoran Industrial Northeast Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet Proposer: Hempel Real Estate RGU: City of Corcoran November 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet Proposer: Hempel Real Estate RGU: City of Corcoran November 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast i Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table of Contents 1. Project Title .....................................................................................................................................................1 2. Proposer .........................................................................................................................................................1 3. Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) .........................................................................................................1 4. Reason for EAW Preparation .........................................................................................................................1 5. Project Location ..............................................................................................................................................2 6. Project Description ..........................................................................................................................................2 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience .................................................................................................................4 8. Cover Types ................................................................................................................................................ 10 9. Permits and Approvals Required ................................................................................................................. 11 10. Land use ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 11. Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms .............................................................................................. 13 12. Water Resources ......................................................................................................................................... 17 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes .............................................................................................. 25 14. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) ........................... 29 15. Historic Properties ....................................................................................................................................... 36 16. Visual ........................................................................................................................................................... 39 17. Air ................................................................................................................................................................. 40 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint ................................................................................ 41 19. Noise ............................................................................................................................................................ 44 20. Transportation .............................................................................................................................................. 45 21. Cumulative Potential Effects ........................................................................................................................ 48 22. Other Potential Environmental Effects ......................................................................................................... 50 Tables Table 1. Project Magnitude .........................................................................................................................................4 Table 2. Climate Considerations and Adaptations .....................................................................................................8 Table 3. Cover Types .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Table 4. Green Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................. 11 Table 5. Tree Canopy .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Table 6. Permits and Approvals .............................................................................................................................. 11 Table 7. Soil within the Project area ........................................................................................................................ 15 Table 8. Surface Waters and Public Waters within One Mile of the Project area ................................................... 17 Table 9. Wetlands within the Project area ............................................................................................................... 19 Table 10. Impaired Waters within One Mile of the Project area .............................................................................. 20 Table 11. Verified Wells Within and Adjacent to the Project area ........................................................................... 21 Table 12. Impacts to Wetlands within the Project area ........................................................................................... 24 Table 13. MPCA Potentially Contaminated Sites within One-Quarter Mile of the Project area .............................. 27 Table 14. Migratory Birds Listed as BCC with the Potential to Occur within the Project area ................................ 31 Table 15. Previously Conducted Archaeological Surveys in the Study Area .......................................................... 36 Table 16. Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites within the Study Area .......................................................... 37 Table 17. Previously Identified Burial Sites and Cemeteries within the Study Area ............................................... 37 Table 18. Previously Identified Above Ground Historic Resources within the Study Area ..................................... 37 Table 19. Emission Categories for Carbon Footprint .............................................................................................. 41 Corcoran Industrial Northeast ii Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 20. Average Trips per Day ............................................................................................................................. 42 Table 21. GHG Emissions Summary (CO2e in short tons per year) ....................................................................... 43 Table 22. Noise Area Classifications ....................................................................................................................... 44 Table 23. Typical Roadway Construction Equipment Noise Levels at 50 Feet....................................................... 45 Table 24. Year 2028 No Build and Build Intersection Operations Analysis ............................................................ 46 Table 25. Year 2040 No Build and Build Intersection Operations Analysis ............................................................ 47 Figures Figure 1: Project Location USGS Topo Figure 2: Project Location Aerial Map Figure 3: Site Plan Figure 4: Existing Land Cover Figure 5: Existing Land Use Figure 6: Proposed Land Use Figure 7: Parks and Trails Figure 8: Surficial Geology Figure 9: Soil and Farmland Classification Figure 10: Minnesota Well Index Figure 11: Water Resources Figure 12: Wetland Impacts Figure 13: FEMA Flood Zones Figure 14: MPCA Potentially Contaminated Sites Appendices Appendix A: Figures Appendix B: MDH Well Log Reports and Stratigraphic Records Appendix C: WCA Notice of Decision Appendix D: Feasibility Study Report Appendix E: NHIS Query and IPaC Species List Appendix F: Greenhouse Gas Analysis Calculations Appendix G: Traffic Impact Study Corcoran Industrial Northeast 1 Environmental Assessment Worksheet December 2022 version Environmental Assessment Worksheet This most recent Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and guidance documents are available at the Environmental Quality Board’s website at: https://www.eqb.state.mn.us/ The EAW form provides information about a Project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. Guidance documents provide additional detail and links to resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item or can be addressed collectively under EAW Item 21. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project Title Corcoran Industrial Northeast 2. Proposer Proposer: Hempel Real Estate Contact person: Brandon Champeau Title: Executive Vice President - Development Address: 10050 Crosstown Circle Suite 600 City, State, ZIP: Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 612-432-5774 Fax: N/A Email: bchampeau@hempelcompanies.com 3. Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) RGU Agency: City of Corcoran Contact person: Kendra Lindahl Title: City Planner Address: 8200 County Road 116 City, State, ZIP: Corcoran, MN, 55340 Phone: 612-638-0225 Fax: N/A Email: klindahl@landform.net 4. Reason for EAW Preparation Required: Discretionary: EIS Scoping Citizen petition X Mandatory EAW RGU discretion Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): 4410.4300, Subpart 14(A)(2): Industrial facilities (300,000 square foot threshold) Corcoran Industrial Northeast 2 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 5. Project Location County: Hennepin City/Township: Corcoran PLS Location (¼, ¼, Section, Township, Range): east ½ of northeast ¼ of Section 1, Township 119N, Range 23W Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Mississippi River (Rush Creek sub watershed of the Elm Creek watershed) GPS Coordinates: 45.149196, -93.524542 Tax Parcel Number: 0111923110001 At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the Project; See Figure 1 and Figure 2, Appendix A • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating Project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); and See Figure 1, Appendix A • Site plans showing all significant Project and natural features. Pre-construction site plan and post- construction site plan. See Figure 3, Appendix A • List of data sources, models, and other resources (from the Item-by-Item Guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience or other) used for information about current Minnesota climate trends and how climate change is anticipated to affect the general location of the Project during the life of the Project (as detailed below in item 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience). 6. Project Description a. Provide the brief Project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). Hempel Real Estate (Proposer) proposes to develop a light industrial park in the northeastern portion of the City of Corcoran (RGU). The Project would create two industrial buildings, totaling approximately 540,000 square feet. The developer plans to construct the project in two phases and building are intended for a mix of industrial uses, including distribution and manufacturing. The Project would include construction of public improvements, including access roads connecting to County State Aid Highway 101 (CSAH 101), pedestrian improvements, and stormwater management. Construction of the Project is anticipated to begin in summer 2025, with completion of phase 1 in summer 2026. b. Give a complete description of the proposed Project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the Project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities Hempel Real Estate proposes to develop “Brockton Business Park”, a light industrial park including two light industrial use buildings (totaling approximately 540,000 square feet). The buildings would have a mixture of warehouse, manufacturing and other industrial uses and office space (approximately 80 percent and 20 percent, respectively). The Project area is located in the Northeast District of the City of Corcoran in Hennepin County, Minnesota on the west side of CSAH 101. CSAH 101 is the boundary between Maple Grove, immediately to the east. The Project Area is bordered by Rogers to the north and Dayton to the northeast. The Project area is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is planned to develop with municipal sanitary sewer and water. The 78.85-acre Project area currently Corcoran Industrial Northeast 3 Environmental Assessment Worksheet consists of agricultural land, wetlands and undeveloped forest. Note: The Project’s construction disturbance and light industrial use would be limited to approximately 50 acres. Within the wooded area in the southwest portion of the Project area, there are remnants of a former farmstead consisting of dilapidated buildings and debris. The farmstead has been evaluated for its potential historic value and deemed as not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Remnants would be removed from the site and properly disposed. Additional information about the farmstead is provided in EAW Item 15. Construction Activities 1) Construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes Standard construction methods are expected to be used. The site layout and landscaping would work with the existing topography of the area. A majority of the existing wetlands and tree cover (approximately 30 percent of the site) would be protected, and an estimated 500 new trees and 1,500 new shrubs would be planted. The Project would include construction of new privately constructed and publicly owned access roads connecting to CSAH 101, including extension of the local road at the Nelson International access south of the Project and a new collector street on the northside of the Project. Turn lanes along CSAH 101, to accommodate the new access roads as well as pedestrian improvements, are anticipated to be constructed. A stormwater management system would be constructed for the Project and would avoid the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplain located in the northern portion of the Project area. The Project is in the MUSA and is planned to develop with municipal sanitary sewer and water. Utilities would need to be extended to serve the site. 2) Modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes No modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes are anticipated. 3) Significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures The dilapidated buildings and remaining foundation associated with the farmstead would be demolished and debris would be properly disposed of. With the exception of the farmstead, the Project area is vacant. 4) Timing and duration of construction activities Construction activities would be expected to begin in the summer of 2025 and would take place in two phases. Phase 1 would be expected to be complete by the summer of 2026, and Phase 2 by the summer of 2027. The expected construction timeline is subject to change and would ultimately be driven by market demand. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 4 Environmental Assessment Worksheet c. Project magnitude Table 1 summarizes the Project magnitude. Table 1. Project Magnitude Description Number Total Project Acreage 78.85 acres1 Linear Project length N/A Number and type of residential units 0 Residential building area (in square feet) 0 sq. ft. Commercial building area (in square feet) 0 sq. ft. Industrial building area (in square feet) 540,000 sq. ft. Institutional building area (in square feet) 0 sq. ft. Other uses – specify (in square feet) Stormwater Basins - 234,353 sq. ft. (estimated) Preserved Wetlands - 905,612 sq. ft. (estimated) Berming - 85,378 sq. ft. (estimated) Greenspace - 1,150,420 sq. ft. (estimated) Structure height(s) Maximum 45 ft 1While the Project area is 78.85 acres, only approximately 50 acres would be directly disturbed by the Project through construction and use. d. Explain the Project purpose; if the Project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the Project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of the Project is to provide additional warehousing and office space for business in the City of Corcoran. The City of Corcoran 2040 Comprehensive Plan 0F1guides the Project area as Light Industrial and according to the city document, it is the only remaining parcel of undeveloped industrial land in the Northeast District. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present Project, timeline and plans for environmental review. f. Is this Project a subsequent stage of an earlier Project? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience a. Describe the climate trends in the general location of the Project (see guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience) and how climate change is anticipated to affect that location during the life of the Project. In general, Minnesota is anticipated to experience an increase in temperature, precipitation, and more frequent extreme precipitation events resulting from climate change. In Minnesota, annual average temperatures have risen two degrees over the past century and up to three degrees in the northern part of the state. The highest average temperature increases have occurred during the winter. Since 1895, temperatures during the winter have increased at a rate two to three times higher than during the 1 City of Corcoran, 2019. 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Available at: https://www.corcoranmn.gov/public_services/planning_and_zoning/corcoran_2040_comprehensive_plan_update. Accessed November 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 5 Environmental Assessment Worksheet summer. In particular, winter warming rates have risen more sharply in recent decades. 1F2 Current climate warming trends, most notably during the winter, are anticipated to continue.2F3 Heavy rain events have become more frequent in Minnesota and more intense. From 1973 to 2020, Minnesota experienced 17 mega-rain events3F4 with a notable increase since 2000. Of these 17 events, three occurred in the 1970s, two in the 1980s, one in the 1990s, six mega-rain events occurred in the 2000s, four in the 2010s, and one in 2020. Thus, in the past 21 years (2000 to 2020), almost two times as many mega rain events occurred compared to the prior 27 years (1973 to 1999).4F5 Climate trends in Hennepin County parallel the overall statewide trends, indicating Minnesota’s climate is becoming warmer and wetter. Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 illustrate historical average annual temperature and precipitation trends from 1895 to 2023, respectively. During this time period, the County experienced an average annual temperature increase of 0.24 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) per decade and an annual precipitation increase of 0.23 inches per decade. Exhibit 1. Historical Annual Average Temperature in Hennepin County (1895 – 2024) Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR). https://arcgis.MnDNR.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical Exhibit 2. Historical Annual Average Precipitation in Hennepin County (1895 – 2024) 2 MnDNR, undated(a). Climate Trends. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/climate_change_info/climate-trends.html. Accessed October 2024. 3 MnDOT, 2021. Minnesota Go Climate Change Report. Available at: https://www.minnesotago.org/trends/climate-change. Accessed October 2024. 4 Mega-rain events are defined as events in which six inches of rain covers more than 1,000 square miles and the core of the event tops eight inches. 5 MnDNR, 2024(a). Historic Mega-Rain Events in Minnesota. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/summaries_and_publications/mega_rain_events.html. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 6 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Source: MnDNR. https://arcgis.MnDNR.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) utilizes temperature and precipitation data to estimate relative soil moisture conditions and serve as an indicator of long-term drought conditions. The index ranges from -5 to +5 indicating dry and wet conditions, respectively. PDSI values are reported on a monthly basis. Exhibit 3 shows historic PDSI values for the month of August from 1895 to 2023 for Hennepin County, which indicates an increase of 0.18 per decade. Generally, the PDSI historical data indicates that the region is experiencing a wetter climate. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 7 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Exhibit 3. Historical PDSI Values for Hennepin County (1895 – 2024) Source: MnDNR. https://arcgis.MnDNR.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical Projected climate trends indicate that temperatures within the County would continue to increase. Exhibit 4 illustrates Projected temperatures for the County. Several climate models are shown in the projected temperature analysis. The model mean, shown in blue, illustrates the average of all models included in the analysis. Exhibit 4 shows the modeled present condition, mid-century (2040-2059) at Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5, late-century (2080-2099) at RCP 4.5, and late-century (2080-2099) at RCP 8.5. RCP is a greenhouse gas concentration scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in the fifth assessment report. RCP 4.5 is an intermediate scenario in which emissions decline after peaking around 2040 and RCP 8.5 represents a worst-case scenario in which emissions continue rising through the 21st century. Under the RCP 4.5 scenario, the annual temperature is anticipated to increase within the County from a modeled present mean of 45.3°F (1980-1999) to a mid-century (2040-2059) model mean of 48.9°F and a late-century (2080-2099) model mean of 51.3°F. Under the RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario, the County would experience a late-century (2080-2099) model mean temperature of 55.0°F. In comparison to the modeled present mean (1980-1999), the late-century (2080-2099) modeled mean annual temperature would increase by approximately 12.4 percent under the RCP 4.5 scenario and increase by approximately 19.3 percent under the RCP 8.5 scenario. Exhibit 4. Projected Temperatures in Hennepin County Source: MnDNR. https://arcgis.MnDNR.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical Exhibit 5 presents Projected average annual precipitation for Hennepin County. Under the RCP 4.5 scenario, the annual precipitation is anticipated to increase within the County from a modeled present mean of 31.6 inches (1980-1999) to a mid-century (2040-2059) model mean of 32.1 inches and a late- century (2080-2099) model mean of 32.9 inches. Under the RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario, the County would experience a late-century (2080-2099) model mean precipitation of 35.7 inches. In comparison to Corcoran Industrial Northeast 8 Environmental Assessment Worksheet the modeled present mean (1980-1999), the late-century (2080-2099) modeled mean annual precipitation would increase by approximately 4.0 percent under the RCP 4.5 scenario and increase by approximately 12.2 percent under the RCP 8.5 scenario. Exhibit 5. Projected Precipitation in Hennepin County Source: MnDNR. https://arcgis.MnDNR.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical b. For each Resource Category in the table below: Describe how the Project’s proposed activities and how the Project’s design will interact with those climate trends. Describe proposed adaptations to address the Project effects identified. Table 2 summarizes climate considerations related to the Project and adaptation considerations. Table 2. Climate Considerations and Adaptations Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Adaptations Project Design Projected climate trends include increasing temperatures, precipitation, and frequency of heavy rainfall events. Minnesota is trending towards warmer temperatures. Urban heat islands occur when impervious surfaces, such as roofs and paved surfaces, absorb heat during the day and release it at night, amplifying the warming trend. Construction of buildings, roadways, pedestrian improvements, and parking areas associated with the Project would increase impervious surface area. Increased impervious surfaces would increase volume of stormwater runoff and potential flooding risk during heavy rain events. Impervious surfaces may create local heat island effects by absorbing heat during daytimes hours and radiating it at night leading to an increase in surface temperatures. The Project would follow proposed and recommended actions outlined by the City of Corcoran which may include planning documents such as the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. Additional measures to minimize heat island effects may include strategically planting trees to increase shading near buildings to reduce energy use associated with air conditioning and incorporating green building design features such as green roofs or cool roofs to reduce energy costs, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, and improvements to manage stormwater runoff rates. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 9 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Adaptations Land Use Heavier rainfall expected to bring a higher risk of localized flooding. Increased temperatures may create public health crises primarily for the vulnerable communities such as children and the elderly. The majority of the Project area currently consists of wetlands, agricultural land, and undeveloped forest. Conversion from agricultural and undeveloped land to industrial development would increase impervious surfaces and may contribute to local heat island effects. he Project does not propose critical facilities such as hospitals, daycare centers, public utilities, or schools within the Project area that would have heightened sensitivity to the climate considerations identified. Measures to avoid and minimize impacts to existing wetlands within the Project area would be evaluated. Opportunities to mitigate potential increased risk of flooding associated with a projected increase in heavy rainfall events may include constructing green infrastructure features such as rain gardens, catch basins, and infiltration systems. Local heat island effects from adding impervious surface to the Project area may be mitigated by avoiding removal of existing tree canopy and the planting of new trees to increase shade in developed areas. Water Resources Addressed in Item 12. Contamination/ Hazardous Materials/Wastes The Project area is projected to experience an increase in precipitation and heavy rainfall events. The Project is not anticipated to involve the installation of chemical/ hazardous materials storage during operation. The Project would include building demolition and removals (farmstead only). A Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) plan would be utilized during construction to minimize the potential for spill events. Waste generated during construction and demolition would be properly managed and disposed of in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 10 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Adaptations Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features) Addressed in Item 14. 8. Cover Types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development. Table 3 and Figure 4, Appendix A summarize cover types within the Project area. Table 3. Cover Types Cover Types Before (acres) After (acres) Wetlands and shallow lakes (<2 meters deep) 20.71 20.4 Deep lakes (>2 meters deep) 0.41 0.4 Wooded/forest 10.6 5.5 Brush/grassland 9.8 9 Cropland 35.9 0 Lawn/landscaping 0 11.63 Green infrastructure TOTAL (from table below*) 0 0 Impervious surface 1.52 26.6 Stormwater Basins 0 5.4 TOTAL 78.94 78.94 Before” Acreages are approximate and based on TCMA 1-Meter Land Cover geospatial data (see Figure 4, Appendix A), tree survey data, and wetland delineation data. 1 The combined “Before” acreages for “Deep lakes” and “Wetlands and shallow lakes” reflects the wetland delineation totaling 21.1 acres. 2 Based on visual geospatial and field observations, some of the “Impervious surface” quantified for the “Before” condition (including Roads/Paved Surfaces reflected in Figure 4, Appendix A) would likely be better categorized as “Cropland” or “Brush/grassland”. 3 “After” acreage for “Lawn/landscaping” would include approximately 500 new trees and 1,500 new shrubs. 4 78.85-acre site rounded for purposes of this exercise to 78.9 acres. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 11 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 4. Green Infrastructure Green Infrastructure* Before (acreage) After (acreage) Constructed infiltration systems (infiltration basins/infiltration trenches/ rainwater gardens/bioretention areas without underdrains/swales with impermeable check dams) 0 0 Constructed tree trenches and tree boxes 0 0 Constructed wetlands 0 0 Constructed green roofs1 0 0 Constructed permeable pavements 0 0 Other (describe) Landfill-based geothermal system 0 0 TOTAL* 0 0 1 Proposer has designed building rooftops with square footage to accommodate future, potential green roof opportunities. Table 5. Tree Canopy Trees Percent Number Percent tree canopy removed, or number of mature trees removed during development 48 percent Number of new trees planted 500 9. Permits and Approvals Required List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the Project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Table 6. Permits and Approvals Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit- To be completed, if required State Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit To be completed MPCA Sewer Extension Permit To be completed MPCA Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup and/or Brownfield Programs Response Action Plan (RAP) and Construction Contingency Plan (CCP) Approval Minnesota Department of Health Watermain Extension Permit To be completed Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI) 1 Plumbing Review Permit To be completed Corcoran Industrial Northeast 12 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Unit of Government Type of Application Status County Hennepin County County Road Access Permit To be completed Hennepin County Right of Way Permit To be completed Local City of Corcoran EAW / EIS Need Decision Draft prepared City of Corcoran Wetland Conservation Act (Boundary Approval/Replacement Plan) To be completed City of Corcoran Preliminary and Final Plat To be completed City of Corcoran Site Plan To be completed City of Corcoran Variance To be completed City of Corcoran Erosion Control, Grading, and Stormwater Permit To be completed City of Corcoran Building Permits To be completed Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Stormwater, Erosion Control, and Site Plan Approval To be completed 1 Permit would be coordinated by Proposer with DOLI during City Building Permit review. Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 10-20, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No.22. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 21. 10. Land use a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks and open space, cemeteries, trails, prime or unique farmlands. There is a vacant home and several associated farmstead agricultural buildings. Most of the existing land use of the site is agricultural. On the uncultivated areas, there are scattered clumps of trees and vegetation, natural grasslands and mowed turf areas. Five wetlands are shown on the site. The surrounding property to the north, east and west is a mix of cropland, woods, wetlands, and undeveloped natural open space. Two of the properties to the east, across CSAH 101, have single family homes and accessory buildings. The property to the south is developed as Nelson International and the western portion of that property has a large wetland complex. See Appendix A Figure 5 for details. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The site is guided Light Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan. The site is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) in phase I of the sewer staging plan. The Parks and Trails map (Figure 7, Appendix A) shows a potential Greenway Corridor though the south portion of the property as well as an off-road trail along the western property line. On road trails are planned on CSAH 101 and the future extension of CSAH 117 in Rogers north of this site. Additionally, as described in the Feasibility Study Report in Appendix D, Section 3.1, the development would include dedication of property and coordination with the City for a future well site along the western portion of the development. The future well would ultimately provide raw water to the City’s recently constructed water treatment facility. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 13 Environmental Assessment Worksheet iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The site is zoned Light Industrial (I-1) and is subject to the Northeast District Design Guidelines. This is the only remaining parcel of industrial land in the Northeast District. The proposed office/industrial uses are allowed in the I-1 Zoning District and Northeast District. iv. If any critical facilities (i.e. facilities necessary for public health and safety, those storing hazardous materials, or those with housing occupants who may be insufficiently mobile) are proposed in floodplain areas and other areas identified as at risk for localized flooding, describe the risk potential considering changing precipitation and event intensity. Not applicable. b. Discuss the Project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. The proposed Project includes planned infrastructure improvements related to new public streets, utilities and surface water management and treatment. Erosion control measures would be required and utilized per state requirements during construction, and the Zoning Ordinance addresses noise, smoke odor and other potential negative impacts on surrounding areas that could be encountered with an industrial use of the site. Landscaping installations required with the Project development would have known and proven benefits for birds, wildlife, shade cooling, air quality and carbon reduction. c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed Project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 10b above and any risk potential. The required setbacks and landscaping would buffer the new use from existing surrounding land uses. The Project is preserving significant natural open space with trees and wetlands on the north and south portions of the property to buffer from adjacent properties. The City would proactively monitor the construction to ensure compliance with all City, watershed and state regulations. 11. Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the Project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the Project and any effects the Project could have on these features. Identify any Project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. The surficial geology in the Project area has been mapped by the Minnesota Geological Survey’s (MGS) Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County as being sediments consisting of glacial till. Specifically, the Project area contains loam till and clay loam till, with the presence of organic clayey silt to sand in the northeast and southwest corners (Figure 8, Appendix A). The surface expression of the till is generally rolling and hummocky with numerous ice-walled stagnation plains and ice-block melt-out depression indicative of ice stagnation. Silt loam deposited in ponded water is thin, patchy, and locally present on the tops of ice-walled stagnation plains. The organic clayey silt and sands are lacustrine deposits in former lake basins that were likely originated as water ponded in former ice block locations. Organic detritus comprised of plant material in post-glacial land surface depressions exist in areas currently or formerly beneath the water table.5F6 The bedrock geology across the Project area has been mapped in the MGS Geologic Atlas of 6 Steenberg, Julia R.; Bauer, Emily J.; Chandler, V.W.; Retzler, Andrew J.; Berthold, Angela J.; Lively, Richard S. 2018(a). Minnesota Geological Survey. County Atlas Series. Atlas C-45, Hennepin County. Plate 3 – Surficial Geology. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11299/200919. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 14 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Hennepin County as being the Jordan Sandstone from the late Cambrian Period. The Jordan Sandstone is characterized by medium- to coarse-grained, friable quartzose sandstone.6F7 The bedrock topography within the Project area is mapped to be approximately 801 to 825 feet above mean sea level (amsl) and the depth to bedrock is estimated between 76 and 150 feet.7F8 According to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Minnesota Well Index (MWI), one well was identified within the Project area and five wells were identified within one-quarter mile of the Project area. One of these wells (Unique Well 208988) has a well log and stratigraphic report recording the presence of bedrock, the Jordan Sandstone, at 139 ft.8F9 The well log report and stratigraphic record are available in Appendix B. According to the MnDNR, Karst Feature Inventory, there are no known karst or sinkhole features within the Project area or within the vicinity of the Project area. Further, the US Geological Survey (USGS) does not identify the Project area as being within a known or potential karst area (Weary and Doctor 2014).9F10 The nearest known feature is a sinkhole approximately 10 miles to the northeast of the Project area in Andover, MN (field verified in 2017).10F11 The first encountered bedrock at the Project area is the Jordan Sandstone, which is an insoluble quartz-rich sandstone not known for karst development. Due to the lack of soluble carbonate bedrock, the formation of karst within the Project area is unlikely. b. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from Project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after Project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 12.b.ii. The approximately 78.9-acre Project area features mixed topography. The southern approximately two- thirds of the site is relatively flat with gently, undulating contours. The northern one-third features an approximately 15 percent hillside across the whole width of the property that slopes down to another relatively flat area. The highest elevations are in the south end of the Project area. Total elevation change within the site is approximately 36 feet. The site is currently undeveloped with no impervious surfaces. Wetlands are present on the south and north ends. According to the U.S. Department of Agricultural (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soil survey data11F12, there are 10 soil map units within the Project area. A soil map unit is typically comprised of more than one soil series. The various series in a map unit represent associated soils that formed on different landscape positions within the map unit. The map unit is named after the most dominant soil series by areal extent. Table 7 below lists the soil map units within the Project area and select map unit attributes relevant to Item 11b, such as Hydrologic Soil Group, Wind Erodibility Group, and Water Erodibility Factor. Attributes in Table 7 are for the dominant soil condition within the map unit. See Figure 9, Appendix A for soil survey mapping. 7 Steenberg, Julia R.; Bauer, Emily J.; Chandler, V.W.;Retzler, Andrew J.; Berthold, Angela J.; Lively, Richard S. 2018(b). Minnesota Geological Survey. County Atlas Series. Atlas C-45, Hennepin County. Plate 2 – Bedrock Geology. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11299/200919. Accessed October 2024 8 Steenberg, Julia R.; Bauer, Emily J.; Chandler, V.W.;Retzler, Andrew J.; Berthold, Angela J.; Lively, Richard S. 2018(c). Minnesota Geological Survey. County Atlas Series. Atlas C-45, Hennepin County. Plate 6 – Depth to Bedrock and Bedrock Topography. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11299/200919. Accessed October 2024. 9 MDH, 2024. MWI. Available at: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/mwi/index.html. Accessed October 2024 10 Weary, D.J. and Doctor, D.H.. 2014. Karst in the United States: A digital map compilation and database: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014-1156, 23 p. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141156. Accessed October 2024. 11 MnDNR, undated(b). Karst Feature Inventory. Available at: https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=9df792d8f86546f2aafc98b3e31adb62. Accessed October 2024 12 Soil Survey Staff, NRCS, USDA, 2024. Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO). Accessed via ESRI ArcGIS Online tool October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 15 Environmental Assessment Worksheet The soil map units within the Project area generally feature low wind or water erosion potential. Only one the map unit features rapidly permeability, but only if subject to artificial drainage (map unit L14A). Map units L14A, L15A, L23A, L24A, and L45A feature hydric soils with water tables at or near the surface during parts of the growing season, which would create limitations for infiltrative stormwater practices. The Project would significantly alter the existing soil and topographic conditions through grading and construction activities. It is anticipated that approximately 50 acres of the Project area soils would be disturbed by grading or filling activities related to site leveling for structure and road construction. Soil balance and grading volumes are not yet known and would be determined when the design and grading plan are further developed. The Project would adhere to erosion and sediment control practices during demolition, construction, and operations per the conditions of the Project’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Stormwater Permit, and any local permitting conditions. See EAW Item 12.b.ii for details on stormwater management and erosion and sediment control. Table 7. Soil within the Project area Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Hydrologic Group Wind Erodibility Group Water Erodibility Factor (Kf) Acres % of Project area L44A Nessel loam, 1 to 3% slopes C 5 0.32 16.76 21.25% L60B Angus-Moon complex, 2 to 5% slopes B 6 0.33 16.09 20.41% L24A Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1% slopes C/D 6 0.32 14.47 18.35% L45A Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3% slopes C/D 5 0.36 8.97 11.38% L14A Houghton muck, 0 to 1% slopes A/D 2 No Rating 8.34 10.58% L23A Cordova loam, 0 to 2% slopes C/D 6 0.3 4.08 5.17% L37B Angus loam, 2 to 6% slopes C 6 0.32 3.80 4.82% L22C2 Lester loam, 6 to 10% slopes, moderately eroded C 6 0.32 2.38 3.01% L15A Klossner, Okoboji and Glencoe soils, ponded C/D 8 0.36 2.10 2.66% L61C2 Lester-Metea complex, 6 to 12% slopes, eroded B 6 0.32 1.85 2.35% L44A Nessel loam, 1 to 3% slopes C 5 0.32 16.76 21.25% TOTAL: 78.85 100.00% Note: The hydrologic soil groups are: • Group A: Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 16 Environmental Assessment Worksheet • Group B: Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained, or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. • Group C: Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. • Group D: Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential). These consist chiefly of soils with high clay content, soils that have a high-water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. • Dual Groups: Dual Group designations (A/D, B/D, or C/D) are used to indicate wet soils that belong to Group D due to a high water table but would meet the drainage or textural criteria for Group A, B, or C if drained. Dual Group soils should be treated as Group D soils in the absence of effective artificial drainage. The soil erodibility factors are: • Wind Erodibility Group: Soils are assigned a Wind Erodibility Group (WEG) rating based on their inherent vulnerability to soil particle detachment from wind forces. Values range from 1 (most erodible) to 8 (least erodible). • Water Erodibility Factor (Kf): The Soil Erodibility Factor (Kf) is a unitless quantitative description of the inherent vulnerability of a soil to water erosion. It provides a measurement of soil particles’ susceptibility to detachment from rain drops or surface runoff. Values range from 0.02 (least erodible) to 0.69 (most erodible). Corcoran Industrial Northeast 17 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 12. Water Resources a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, shoreland classification and floodway/floodplain, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include the presence of aquatic invasive species and the water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the Project. Include MnDNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. Surface Waters The Project area is located within the Rush Creek subwatershed of the Elm Creek Watershed and is part of the larger upper Mississippi River watershed. A review of geospatial data determined that one lake12F13 was located within the Project area. No wildlife lakes13F14, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lakes14F15, outstanding resource value waters15F16 or infested waters16F17 are located within the Project area. Table 8 below lists the surface waters identified in the Minnesota Public Water Inventory17F18, MnDNR Hydrography Dataset and MnDNR State Designated Trout Streams18F19 databases located within one mile of the Project area. See Figure 11, Appendix A for select surface water features. Table 8. Surface Waters and Public Waters within One Mile of the Project area Water Resource Type Kittle No./Public Water ID Special Designation Within Project area Unnamed Public Water Wetland 27031900 Public Water Within One Mile of the Project area Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Intermittent Water, Public Water Wetland 27031700 Public Water Unnamed Lake/Pond, Public 27011300 Public Water 13 MnDNR, 2022(a). DNR Hydrography Dataset. Available at: DNR Hydrography Dataset . Accessed October 2024. 14 MnDNR, 2016(a). Designated Wildlife Lakes. Available at: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-designated-wildlife-lakes. Accessed October 2024. 15 MnDNR, 2016(b). Migratory Waterfowl Feeding and Resting Areas. Available at: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-migratory-waterfowl- areas. Accessed October 2024. 16 MnDNR, 2020. Lakes of Biological Significance. Available at: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-lakes-of-biological-signific. Accessed October 2024. 17 MnDNR, 2023. Listed Infested Waters. Available at: Listed Infested Waters. Accessed October 2024. 18 MnDNR, undated(c). Minnesota Public Waters Inventory. Accessed via MNGEO hosted map server October 2024. 19 MnDNR, 2020(b). State Designated Trout Streams, Minnesota. Available at: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-trout-stream-designations. Accessed October 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast 18 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Water Resource Type Kittle No./Public Water ID Special Designation (Westwood Ponding Area) Water Wetland Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Intermittent Water, Public Water Wetland 27031800 Public Water Unnamed Artificial Basin Unnamed Intermittent Water, Public Water Wetland 27030700 Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Artificial Basin Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Rush Creek Perennial Stream, Public Ditch/Altered Natural Watercourse M-062-004 Public Watercourse, Impaired Stream Rush Creek, South Fork Lake Connector, Public Water Watercourse M-062-004-002 Public Watercourse, Impaired Stream Unnamed Creek Intermittent Stream M-062-004-002- 001 Unnamed Intermittent Stream MAJ-070131312_B Unnamed Intermittent Stream MAJ-070127883_B Corcoran Industrial Northeast 19 Environmental Assessment Worksheet MnDNR Public Waters One MnDNR Public Water is located within the Project area, six MnDNR Public Waters and Watercourses are located within one mile of the Project area. Table 8 above identifies MnDNR Public Waters and Watercourses within one mile of the Project area. Wetland Resources Based on a review of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) data, historic aerial imagery, and wetland delineations conducted by Sambatek in the early Fall of 2021 October 11 and October 22, 2021, five wetlands are present within the Project area (Figure 12, Appendix A). Table 9 summarizes wetlands within the Project area. Appendix C includes the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Notice of Decision. Table 9. Wetlands within the Project area Wetland ID1 Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers and Reed Acres within Project area Wetland 1 Type 1/3 PEM1Ad/PEM1C Seasonally Flooded/Saturated Emergent Wetland/Shallow Marsh 13.73 Wetland 2 Type 1/5 PEM 1A/PUBH Seasonally Flooded/Saturated Emergent Wetland/Non- vegetated Aquatic Community 1.36 Wetland 3 Type 1/3/5 PEM1A/PEM1Cd/PABHx Seasonally Flooded/Saturated Emergent Wetland/Shallow Marsh/Shallow Open Water Community 5.73 Wetland 4 - - - 0.21 Wetland 5 Type 1 PEM1A Seasonally Flooded 0.03 1 Wetland ID’s have been revised by Stantec. The original wetland delineation conducted on October 11, 2021 only identified four wetlands, and the revised wetland map based on the October 22, 2021 delineation did not properly convey Wetland ID’s. MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List Based on a review of the MPCA’s 2024 Impaired Waters List19F20, no MPCA 303d Impaired Waters are located within the Project area. Rush Creek and Rush Creek, South Fork are located less than one mile north of the Project area and are listed as impaired for aquatic life and aquatic recreation as a result of impairments for dissolved oxygen, chloride, E. coli, fish bioassessment, and benthic macroinvertebrates (Table 10; Figure 11, Appendix A). 20 MPCA, 2024. Minnesota’s Impaired Waters List. Available at: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/air-water-land-climate/minnesotas-impaired- waters-list. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 20 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 10. Impaired Waters within One Mile of the Project area Waterbody Name Section AUID1 Affected Designated Use Pollutant or Stressor TMDL2 ID Rush Creek T119N, R23W, S11 07010206-528 Aquatic Life, Aquatic Recreation Dissolved Oxygen, E. Coli, Fish Bioassessment, and benthic Macroinvertebrates PRJ06872-001 Rush Creek, South Fork 07010206-732 Aquatic Life, Aquatic Recreation Chloride, E. Coli, Fish Bioassessment, and benthic Macroinvertebrates PRJ06468-001, PRJ06872-001 1 Assessment Unit Identification (AUID) 2 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Floodway/Floodplain A review of the FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) identified one regulated floodway/floodplain located in the north portion of the Project area (Figure 13, Appendix A).20F21 The floodplain is associated with Rush Creek and is a 100-year floodplain (one percent annual chance of flooding. The proposed northern access road would trigger review and permitting because of the location relative to the floodplain. The stormwater management system would be constructed outside of the floodplain. ii. Groundwater – aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if Project is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. There are no known springs, seeps or karst features present in the Project area. A review of the MDH MWI identified one verified well within the Project area and five verified wells within a quarter-mile radius of the Project area. These wells are presented in Table 11 and Figure 10, Appendix A.21F22 Based on a review of the wells located near the Project area, the depth to static water level ranges from approximately 8 feet to 60 feet. Well log reports are included in Appendix B. 21 FEMA, 2020. National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) mapping tool. Accessed October 2024. 22 MDH, 2024. MWI Version 2.2.0. Available at: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/mwi/index.html. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 21 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 11. Verified Wells Within and Adjacent to the Project area Well ID Use Type Distance from Project Status Depth (ft.) Static Water Level (ft.) 331528 Abandoned Within Project area Sealed 36 15 331529 Environmental Borehole Approx. 100 ft E Sealed 36 33.7 559029 Domestic Approx. 500 ft NW Active 85 20 208988 Domestic Approx. 600 ft SE Active 359 60 738171 Domestic Approx. 800 ft SW Active 82 47 331530 Environmental Borehole Approx. 1,200 ft E Sealed 282 8.4 According to the MDH Source Water Protection Map22F23, the Project area is not within a MDH Wellhead Protection Area or a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). b. Describe effects from Project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. i. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. On behalf of the City of Corcoran, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) completed a feasibility study to evaluate infrastructure improvement recommendations. Sewer service for the proposed development would be via a tie-in to the existing 30-inch trunk sewer located along the east property boundary adjacent to CSAH 101. Appendix D includes the feasibility study report. In addition to the primary 30-inch trunk sewer, one 15-inch sewer stub would be installed to the west property boundary in accordance with City development policy to allow future service to adjacent parcels. In order to avoid overloading the City’s existing and planned wastewater infrastructure, the Proposer would be required to limit the total wastewater volume from the fully developed parcel to not more than 1,000 gallons per day per acre (gpd/acre). This is the volume of wastewater that has been planned for in the design of the Master Sewer Plan included in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and approved by Met Council. Permanent easements for the trunk and lateral sewers would be dedicated to the City. Where both sewer and potable water utilities are being installed in parallel, the easements must be wide enough to accommodate the required separation distance between sewer and potable water lines. 23 MDH, 2023. Source Water Protection Web Map Viewer. Available at: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/swp/mapviewer.html. Accessed September 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 22 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. If septic systems are part of the Project, describe the availability of septage disposal options within the region to handle the ongoing amounts generated as a result of the Project. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity and amount with this discussion. The Project does not propose to discharge to a SSTS. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the Project may influence the effects. The Project would not result in wastewater discharges to surface waters. ii. Stormwater - Describe changes in surface hydrology resulting from change of land cover. Describe the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the Project site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss environmental effects from stormwater discharges on receiving waters post construction including how the Project will affect runoff volume, discharge rate and change in pollutants. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity and amount with this discussion. For Projects requiring NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater permit coverage, state the total number of acres that will be disturbed by the Project and describe the stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), including specific best management practices to address soil erosion and sedimentation during and after Project construction. Discuss permanent stormwater management plans, including methods of achieving volume reduction to restore or maintain the natural hydrology of the site using green infrastructure practices or other stormwater management practices. Identify any receiving waters that have construction-related water impairments or are classified as special as defined in the Construction Stormwater permit. Describe additional requirements for special and/or impaired waters. Pre-Construction Stormwater Runoff Under existing conditions, the Project area primarily consists of agricultural land and wetlands. Surface water runoff drains towards existing wetland areas for the north portion, and to agricultural property to the west. No existing stormwater features are present within the existing Project area. Pollutants typically associated with agricultural areas include pesticides, sediment, nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) from fertilizers and typical agricultural practices. Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Although elimination of agriculture can benefit water quality by reducing export of nutrients and sediments through onsite ponding and filtration (Best Management Practices or BMPs), the construction of additional impervious surfaces, such as the roads, driveways, and building rooftops, increase the volume to nearby surface waters. The increased impervious surface areas would result in higher runoff rates, volumes, compared to the existing conditions, and change in pollutants; however, these changes would be mitigated and approved by the City and local watershed organization, the Elm Creek Water Management Commission (ECWMC). Stormwater BMPs would be constructed to mitigate stormwater runoff rate, volumes, and pollutant loading. It is anticipated that the Project would include a combination of wet ponds with sand filtration benches to provide both settling of sediment and sand filtration of stormwater before discharge. The Concept Site Plan shown in Figures section of the Feasibility Study (Appendix D) identifies the preliminary planned locations for the proposed stormwater BMPs. The proposed drainage design would be reviewed and approved by Corcoran Industrial Northeast 23 Environmental Assessment Worksheet both City and ECWMC as the Project design is developed and would comply with all applicable local and state regulatory requirements. A Construction SWPPP would be required for the NPDES permit issued by the MPCA. The SWPPP is prepared during final Project design and submitted for State approval prior to beginning construction of the Project. Project construction would adhere to the approved SWPPP and the City would inspect for compliance. The Project would also adhere to the City of Corcoran and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) stormwater requirements. Typical of urban development, erosion control would initially occur through temporary sediment basins with temporary ponds and seeded/vegetated ground cover where construction has paused, and perimeter control to avoid erosion and sedimentation throughout the site. Stockpiles would be stabilized when not in use and stockpile perimeter would be controlled. All permanent slopes 4:1 or steeper would have erosion control blankets installed. NPDES Section 23 of the General Stormwater Permit provides guidance on additional controls and conditions required for construction sites within one mile of an impaired water. Since the Project would disturb 50 or more acres, the SWPPP must be submitted to the MPCA 30 days prior to obtaining the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit. iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the Project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a MnDNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Discuss how the proposed water use is resilient in the event of changes in total precipitation, large precipitation events, drought, increased temperatures, variable surface water flows and elevations, and longer growing seasons. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. Describe contingency plans should the appropriation volume increase beyond infrastructure capacity or water supply for the Project diminish in quantity or quality, such as reuse of water, connections with another water source, or emergency connections. The water supply for the Project would be consistent with the City’s planned water supply for Northeast Corcoran. Under a contract to provide water service, the City of Maple Grove has been supplying potable water; however, Corcoran currently has a water treatment plant and water tower under construction, expected to be operational mid- year 2025. Maple Grove would serve as redundant supply. The Feasibility Study (Appendix D) documents results of the updated water system model with actual demands inserted from recent development. The site would be serviced by a 12-inch main from the south that is located at the property line. Average day pressures would be in the 71-74 psi when the industrial facility is built and remain at 71-74 when the ultimate system is built out. This is typical of water systems where the static pressure is consistent. Another analysis (peak hour pressures) shows that initially 68-70 psi can be provided and under ultimate buildout 59-62 psi is provided. This slight change is typical of urban developing communities where the pressure is slightly reduced under the ultimate buildout due to friction losses as the water moves through the system. Fire flow is initially at 2,500–2,800 gallons per minute and increases at ultimate buildout to 3,300 to 4,300 gpm. These values are within the range for municipal supply initially at ultimate buildout. The Feasibility Study (Appendix D) includes the summary of the watermain improvements recommended as part of this Project. The Feasibility Study Report, specifically Section 3.1, also speaks to the development’s dedication of property and coordination with the City for a future well site along the western portion of the development. The future City well would ultimately provide raw water to the City’s new water treatment plant. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 24 Environmental Assessment Worksheet iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the Project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed and identify those probable locations. The Project design sought to avoid and minimize wetland impacts; however, the Project would result in wetland impacts. Direct or indirect impacts are expected to Wetlands 1 and 4 because of the proposed access roads which would fill the wetlands or alter the hydrology to the wetlands (Figure 12, Appendix A). Direct impacts are expected to Wetland 5 because of the proposed stormwater basin which would alter the hydrology of the wetland. Anticipated wetland impacts could total up to 0.3 acres of the existing 21.1 acres of wetland within the Project area. Table 12 summarizes wetlands and their potential impact within the Project area. Minimization of impacts to wetlands would be evaluated as the Project design advances. Table 12. Impacts to Wetlands within the Project area Wetland ID* Circular 39 Cowardin Acres within Project area Potential Impact (acres impacted) Wetland 1 Type 1/3 PEM1Ad/PEM1C 13.73 0.03 Wetland 2 Type 1/5 PEM 1A/PUBH 1.36 0 Wetland 3 Type 1/3/5 PEM1A/PEM1Cd/PABHx 5.73 0 Wetland 4 - - 0.21 0.21 Wetland 5 Type 1 PEM1A 0.03 0.03 Total Acreages 21.06 0.27 All necessary wetland permitting would be obtained prior to any wetland impacts occurring. Impacts would be regulated under WCA as administered by the City of Corcoran as the WCA Local Governmental Unit (LGU). Additionally, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps of Engineers or Corps) would regulate impacts to jurisdictional wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Any wetland impacts requiring mitigation would be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio through the purchase of wetland bank credits. Credits would be purchased from an appropriate wetland bank following the current siting prioritization in the WCA rules Corcoran Industrial Northeast 25 Environmental Assessment Worksheet The City of Corcoran must approve the proposed wetland impacts and plan for replacement before any impacts occur. Additionally, the Corps of Engineers must issue a jurisdictional determination. If any of the impacted wetlands are Corps jurisdictional, a Section 404 permit would be required. The wetland impacts are expected to have minimal effect on the host watershed, as the total impact area is not large, and the existing wetlands are low quality farmed wetlands or small seasonally flooded basins. The replacement wetlands in the wetland bank would be higher quality wetlands and better able to provide ecosystem services than the existing, low quality wetlands. Wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage would be clearly identified and labeled If existing vegetation is proposed to be used as a wetland buffer; these areas would be reviewed with the City of Corcoran wetland specialist to determine if they are viable candidates. b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the Project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/ sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the Project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and Projected watercraft usage. There are no anticipated direct impacts or alterations to surface water features as a result of the Project. Overland water discharges to two large wetland complexes to the north and southwest including public water 27031900 in the southwest. Receiving waters would be evaluated to understand any impacts from additional volume. The stormwater management described in Item 12.b.ii would be in place to avoid impacts to downstream surface waters. Appropriate BMPs such as silt fences, inlet protection, and other sediment and erosion control measures would be taken as needed to avoid and minimize sedimentation in downstream waterbodies. The Project would not change the number or type of watercraft on any local waterbodies. 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes a. Pre-Project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the Project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre-Project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by Project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted for the Project area in March of 2024. An abandoned farmstead, likely developed prior to 1909 and abandoned in the mid-2000s, was identified in a wooded area in the southeastern portion of the Project area. The Phase I ESA identified the following recognized environmental conditions (RECs) associated with the Project area: solid waste and debris (55-gallon drums, a car, used oil filters, etc.) observed in addition to dilapidated buildings associated with an abandoned farmstead on the Project area and a 500-gallon aboveground storage tank (AST) to the west of the farmstead area. The AST was observed on metal supports with no secondary containment in place beneath it. It was concluded that there is a Corcoran Industrial Northeast 26 Environmental Assessment Worksheet potential for inadvertent spills, leaks or overfills to have occurred associated with the AST, and potential soil contamination and/or buried debris may be present based on the type of solid debris observed in the abandoned farmstead area. The Phase I ESA did not identify controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs) or historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs) associated with the Project area. The Phase I ESA identified two additional consideration items which include the identification of what appeared to be a sealed well located near a dilapidated house in the abandoned farmstead area, the potential for other wells, and the likely presence of a septic system associated with the abandoned farmstead based on the age of construction. The second additional consideration item was the potential for buried debris or foundations to be present in the Project area. A Phase II ESA was conducted on the Project area in May 2024 to evaluate whether soil and/or soil vapor have been impacted based on the findings of the Phase I ESA. The Phase II investigation including seven test pits, two soil borings, and two soil vapor probes with four soil samples and two vapor samples collected. Soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), diesel range organics (DRO), gasoline range organics (GRO), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and/or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals. Vapor samples were collected for laboratory analysis of VOCs. The soil borings were advanced in the area of the AST or within the proposed stormwater pond area, test pits were completed in the abandoned farmstead area or where surficial debris was identified, and soil vapor probes were advanced near the abandoned farmstead area where the proposed warehouse location would be. Soil borings were completed to a depth of 30 feet below ground surface (bgs), and test pits were completed to a depth of five or ten feet bgs. Surficial soil identified at the Project area included clayey sand or silty sand with groundwater not identified to 30 feet bgs. Field observations and analytical testing of the soils in the area of the AST and abandoned farmstead did not find evidence of buried debris or significant impacts to the subsurface soils in that area; however, based on the historical site use and the stormwater pond excavation proposed in this area, the potential exists for unexpected environmental conditions to be encountered during redevelopment. A test pit completed in the north portion of the Project area identified buried debris to a depth of two feet bgs, and analytical testing of the debris laden soils identified elevated concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead exceeding their respective MPCA Commercial/Industrial Soil Reference Values (SRVs). Based on the concentrations of lead and cadmium detected in this soil sample, follow-up toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis was requested and completed to facilitate potential future waste profiling for the soil. Additional investigation has been completed to better understand the soil conditions relative to proposed soil excavation and has been incorporated into the Response Action Plan (RAP) and Construction Contingency Plan (CCP) that are described below. Limited soil vapor sampling was conducted to evaluate the area between the proposed building and the abandoned farmstead. Various VOCs were detected in the samples; however, the detected concentrations were not at levels that exceed their respective MPCA 33x Commercial/Industrial Intrusion Screening Values (ISVs). Based on these results, it does not appear that releases in the vicinity of the former farmstead have impacted vapor at actionable levels. A draft RAP and CCP has been prepared to provide procedures for the management of contaminated soils that would be encountered during redevelopment and to provide a plan to evaluate and manage other environmental issues that may arise during redevelopment. In addition to the Phase I and Phase II ESA’s, a review of MPCA’s What’s in My Neighborhood (WIMN) database23F24 was conducted to identify documented potentially contaminated sites within or in 24 MPCA, 2024. What’s in My Neighborhood. Available at: What's in My Neighborhood | Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (state.mn.us). Accessed October 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast 27 Environmental Assessment Worksheet the vicinity of the Project area. No sites were identified within the Project area; however, three sites were identified within one-quarter mile of the Project area. Table 13 summarizes these findings and Figure 14; Appendix A illustrates the location of potentially contaminated sites in close proximity to the Project. Table 13. MPCA Potentially Contaminated Sites within One-Quarter Mile of the Project area Site ID Site Name MPCA Program Status Location 117115 Tree Farm Landscape Underground Tanks (TS0017488) Inactive (Registered from 1993 to 1998) Directly east of Project area 197398 Tree Farm Landscape Investigation and Cleanup - Petroleum Remediation Leak Site (LS0012015) Inactive (Leak reported in 1998, Remedial Investigation Report in 2001) Approx. 600 ft east of Project area 236833 Nelson International Construction Stormwater (C00058336)) Inactive (Coverage from 2020-2023) Approx. 600 ft south of Project area An additional review of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) WIMN database24F25 was conducted to identify documented potentially contaminated sites within or in the vicinity of the Project area. No MDA spill or release sites were identified within the Project area or withing a quarter-mile radius. The Phase II ESA identified an area with RCRA metal impacts on the north portion of the Project area, and the Phase I ESA indicated that potential buried debris could be identified during redevelopment activities. Based on the identified impacts, a RAP and CCP have been prepared. The report would detail the response actions to be undertaken during the redevelopment and provide field decisions-making guidance in the event unanticipated impacts are encountered during redevelopment activities. Any contaminated soils or other potentially hazardous materials encountered during construction would be handled and disposed of in accordance with MPCA and any other applicable requirements. b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the Project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. Construction waste Construction wastes would be typical to the construction of new structures, infrastructure, roadways and parking areas. Construction wastes would be primarily non-hazardous and would be managed as municipal solid waste (MSW) or construction/demolition debris. Hazardous wastes in the form of used oils/lubricants, waste paints, or other materials may be generated during construction. The contractor would be required to manage and dispose of all construction- generated wastes in accordance with MPCA requirements and all other applicable regulatory requirements. Construction wastes would either be recycled or stored in approved containers and disposed of in the proper facilities. Any excess soil material that is not suitable for use onsite would become the property of the contractor and would be disposed of properly. All solid waste would be managed according to MPCA and other regulatory requirements. Construction waste would result from demolition of three dilapidated buildings and remaining foundation 25 MDA, 2024. What’s in my Neighborhood? – Agricultural. Available at: What's In My Neighborhood (arcgis.com) Accessed October 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast 28 Environmental Assessment Worksheet associated with the abandoned farmstead in the southeast of the Project area. Solid wastes generated from the demolition of the existing structures would be disposed of as construction/demolition debris at a permitted landfill. Operational waste The Project would generate solid waste during operation of the development, which will include primarily warehousing and corporate officing activities. Solid waste generated by the warehouse and offices would primarily be managed as mixed municipal waste. The California Department of Resource Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) provides a list of estimated solid waste generation rates for office, industrial, service, and other establishments for general planning purposes.25F 26 It is estimated that the waste generated by the warehouse would be composed of 100 percent municipal solid waste. Based on estimated solid waste generation rates of 6.0 lbs per employee per day for corporate office and 13.82 lbs waste per employee per day for warehousing employees, and applying these rates to the number of employees (a 20%/80% split or 200 for office and 800 for warehousing), it is estimated that the Project would yield a total waste generation rate of 1,282 tons per year. The collection of MSW would be managed by a licensed waste hauler. The Project would adhere to all MPCA requirements and other regulations pertaining to the use, handling, and disposal of solid waste. Recycling areas would be provided in compliance with the Minnesota State Building code. c. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the Project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any new above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Indicate the number, location, size and age of existing tanks on the property that the Project will use. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. The Project is not anticipated to include permanent chemicals/hazardous materials storage or use during its operation. No aboveground or underground storage tanks are planned for permanent use within the Project area. If this changes, a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) plan would be prepared by a licensed Minnesota Professional Engineer pursuant to federal regulations. Hazardous waste may be generated during Project construction from demolition of the existing buildings and remaining foundation. If encountered, regulated materials such as asbestos, lights, and other regulated wastes would be abated and properly disposed of at a permitted facility. A pre-demolition hazardous materials survey would be completed prior to the start of demolition activities. If any regulated materials such as asbestos-containing materials, lead-based paint and other regulated materials/wastes are present, an abatement plan would be prepared to address removal and proper disposal of regulated materials identified in the hazardous materials survey. If required, a comprehensive abatement closeout report would be prepared following abatement and demolition activities, which would document the removal, management, and disposal of any regulated materials. Construction equipment may require the limited use of potentially hazardous materials, such as gasoline or diesel fuels, engine motor oils, hydraulic fluids, and other lubricants. Vehicles responsible for the transportation of hazardous materials would be equipped with spill kits for rapid response to any spills and refueling procedures would be implemented to eliminate leakage. Additionally, all fuels, oils, and lubricants would be stored in containment apparatuses while not in use. Construction staff would be trained to spot and appropriately respond to potential spills. In the event that a leak or spill incident occurs, the contractor would be required to respond in accordance with MPCA containment and remedial action procedures. A SPCC plan would be prepared by a Minnesota Professional Engineer pursuant to federal regulations. 26 CalRecycle. 2019. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Available at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates Accessed September 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 29 Environmental Assessment Worksheet d. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the Project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling It is not anticipated that the Project would generate or require storage of hazardous wastes during its construction or operation. Item 13.c. describes the potential storage and use of hazardous materials during construction and operation of the Project. If hazardous waste is generated by the post-construction facility, proper storage and handling would occur onsite, and the facilities would adhere to county and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for disposal. Various construction materials that are regulated by the MPCA and the EPA may be present within the buildings currently in the Project area. In accordance with requirements by the MPCA and EPA, the buildings under consideration for demolition may require a comprehensive survey conducted to identify accessible suspect asbestos-containing material (ACM) and other regulated materials as defined by the MPCA. If needed, asbestos abatement activities in the Project area would follow rules and regulations by the State of Minnesota and the EPA. The MPCA allows, without sampling, disposal of demolition debris that may contain Lead Based Paint (LBP) coatings. Therefore, if a building is scheduled for demolition, suspect LBP coatings do not require sampling. In addition, the MPCA allows, without sampling, disposal of demolition debris that may contain polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-containing caulks, sealants and coatings. Therefore, if a building was constructed after 1979 or is scheduled for demolition, suspect PCB- containing caulks do not require sampling. A final report documenting the findings of the survey shall be completed. Based on the findings of the building survey, if a Project specification is generated, it must be written by an MDH accredited Asbestos Project Designer. 14. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. The Project is located within the Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (222), the Minnesota and Northeast Morainal Section (222M), and the Big Woods Subsection (222Mb) as defined by the MnDNR in the Field Guide to Native Plant Communities of Minnesota – The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province.26F27 Current land use within this subsection primarily consists of cropland and pasture with some remaining upland forest and wetland. Historically, the subsection consisted largely of oak woodland and maple-basswood forest.27F28,28F29 The land cover within the Project area was reviewed and is described in Item 8 and Table 3. Figure 4, Appendix A illustrates the land cover types within the Project area based on geospatial data. The mixed forest, brush/grassland, cropland, wetlands, and ponds may provide nesting, foraging, and/or travel habitat for a variety of urban wildlife species, including passerine birds, raptors, squirrels, rabbits, deer, coyotes, foxes, and other small mammals. Suitable roosting habitat for bats may be present within the limited forested areas. Wetlands and ponds within the Project area may also provide habitat for aquatic and semi-aquatic species, such as turtles, fish, frogs, salamanders, and toads. b. Describe rare features state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA- ) and/or correspondence number (MCE ) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage Review letter from the MnDNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the 27 Aaseng, N., 2005. Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota – The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province. St. Paul: DNR. 28 MnDNR, 1999. Minnesota Geospatial Commons – Ecological Sections of Minnesota. Available at: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/geos- ecological-class-system. Accessed October 2024. 29 MnDNR, 2000. Ecological Classification System. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/ecs/index.html. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 30 Environmental Assessment Worksheet results. Under Stantec’s Limited License to Use Copyrighted Material (LA 2022-023) related to Rare Features Data, the MnDNR Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) was searched in October 2024 to identify species within a one-mile buffer of the Project area. The NHIS search did not identify any records within the Project area or within a one-mile buffer of the Project area. A formal NHIS review request (MCE No. 2024-00852) was submitted to the MnDNR through the Minnesota Conservation Explorer (MCE) system and a final letter was received on October 11, 2024. According to this response, further review by the Natural Heritage Review Team is not needed for state-listed threatened and endangered species or ecologically significant areas. Appendix E provides a copy of the MnDNR MCE response letter. Native Plant Communities and Sites of Biodiversity Significance Based on a review of the MnDNR MCE portal,29F30 no native plant communities, calcareous fens, Minnesota Biological Survey (MBS) sites, or lakes of biological significance are located within the Project area. State – Listed Species The NHIS search did not identify any records of rare species within the Project area or within one mile of the Project area. Federally – Listed Species A review of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool30F31 was conducted in October 2024 to identify federally listed species, those species proposed for federal listing, and candidates for federal listing with the potential to occur within the Project area. Four species were identified from this review: the salamander mussel (Simpsonaias ambigua; proposed endangered), the western regal fritillary (Argynnis idalia occidentalis; proposed threatened), the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus; candidate), and the whooping crane (Grus americana; non-essential experimental population). Appendix E provides a copy of the IPaC results. Salamander mussel The salamander mussel is restricted to the lower St. Croix River in Minnesota but was once also found in the Mississippi River. This species is only found under flat rocks or under ledges of rock walls, which is habitat that is also occupied by its glochidial host, the mudpuppy salamander (Necturus masculosus).31F32 The Project area does not overlap and is not within the vicinity of the St Croix River or the Mississippi River. As such, impacts on the salamander mussel as a result of the Project are not anticipated. Western regal fritillary The western regal fritillary is associated throughout its range in upland and wetland native prairies. Regal fritillary larvae appear to be restricted to upland prairie where they feed exclusively on the nectar of violets (Viola spp.), such as prairie bird’s-foot violet (Viola palmata var. pedatifida) and bird’s-foot violet (V. pedata), the latter of which is utilized in the southeast section of the state.32F33 The Project area does not contain any native prairie habitat according to a review of the MnDNR MCE portal. As such, impacts on the western regal fritillary are not anticipated as a result of the Project. Monarch butterfly The monarch butterfly is a migratory butterfly that exists in two main populations within the United States 30 MnDNR. undated(d). Minnesota Conservation Explorer. Available at: https://mce.dnr.state.mn.us/. Accessed October 2024. 31 USFWS, 2024. Information for Planning and Consultation. Available at: https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/. Accessed October 2024. 32 MnDNR, undated(e). Rare Species Guide: Simpsonaias ambigua. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=IMBIV41010. Accessed October 2024. 33 MnDNR, 2018. Rare Species Guide: Argynnis idalia. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=IILEPJ6040. Accessed August 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 31 Environmental Assessment Worksheet divided by the Rocky Mountains: the eastern population that overwinters in the mountains of Mexico, and the western population that overwinters along the southern pacific coast of California.33F34 Monarch butterflies are a widespread species found in fields, prairies, savannahs, and most places where their host plant milkweed (Asclepias spp.) occurs throughout the United States and southern Canada. This species generally occurs in areas with high densities of native nectar sources. During late summer and migration, adults use nectar species such as black-eyed Susan (Rudbeckia hirta), narrow-leaved coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia), and rough blazing star (Liatris aspera).34F35 However, the presence of milkweed is required as it is the only plant on which monarch caterpillars can feed.35F36 Given the wide range of habitats the monarch butterfly can occupy, it may occur within the Project area, especially if milkweed is present. The use of native seed mixes in the Project area as part of the restoration process would enhance the habitat for the monarch butterfly. Whooping crane The whooping crane is a migratory bird species that once nested in northern prairies, but now breeds in remote northern forests in Canada as well as in an experimental population in Wisconsin, preferably within coniferous habitat containing swamps and nearby lakes or ponds. Winter habitat consists of coastal marshes (e.g., Texas, Louisiana, and Florida).36F37 The Project area does not contain prairie or coniferous forest habitat preferred by the whooping crane. Additionally, the Project area is located within the Mississippi Flyway while the wild population of whooping crane utilizes the Central Flyway located further west. Any unlikely occurrence of a whooping crane within the Project area would, therefore, likely be from the experimental population in Wisconsin that is not federally regulated. As such, impacts to this species as a result of the Project are not anticipated. Migratory birds Fourteen migratory bird species listed as USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and one eagle species have the potential to occur within the Project area according to the USFWS IPaC review (Appendix E). These species and their habitat requirements are detailed in Table 14 using data from the Cornell Lab of Ornithology.37F38 Table 14. Migratory Birds Listed as BCC with the Potential to Occur within the Project area Common Name Scientific Name Nesting, Foraging, and/or Migration Habitat Bald eagle1 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Forested areas (conifers and deciduous trees) near large bodies of open water. Open uplands near open water in winter. Black tern Chlidonias niger surinamenisis Large (>50 acres), dense marshes for breeding. Lagoons, river edges, lakes, marshes, and beaches during migration. Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Breeds in open areas (grasslands, tallgrass and mixed prairie, hayfields, meadows); coastal areas pre-migration. 34 USDA Forest Service. undated(a). Migration and Overwintering. Available at: https://www.fs.fed.us/wildflowers/pollinators/Monarch_Butterfly/migration/. Accessed November 2021. 35 MnDNR, 2022(b). Butterfly Gardens. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/gardens/butterfly/index.html. Accessed October 2024. 36 National Wildlife Federation. undated. Monarch Butterfly. Available at: https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife- Guide/Invertebrates/Monarch-Butterfly. Accessed October 2024. 37 Audubon, undated. Guide to North American Birds: Whooping Crane. Available at: https://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/whooping- crane. Accessed September 2022. 38 Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2024. All About Birds. Ithaca, New York. Available at: https://www.allaboutbirds.org/news/#. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 32 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Common Name Scientific Name Nesting, Foraging, and/or Migration Habitat Canada warbler Cardellina canadensis Breeds in mixed conifer and deciduous forest with mossy/shrubby understory near water. Shrubby areas in parks, woodlots, and along forest edges during migration. Cerulean warbler Setophaga cerulea Breeds in mature deciduous forests with tall trees. Chimney swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds in rural and urban settings in chimneys, tree cavities, and caves. Forages over open habitats, forests, ponds, and residential areas. Golden-winged warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Breeds in open woodlands, wet thickets, shrub, tamarack bogs, aspen or willow stands, and wetlands. Grasshopper sparrow Ammodramus savannarum perpallidus Grasslands, prairies, hayfields, and open pastures with little scrub and some bare ground. Henslow’s sparrow Centronyx henslowii Breeds in wet meadows, weedy pastures, lowland prairie, and cultivated hayfields. Lesser yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Breeds in open woodlands with marshes, bogs, and/or ponds; during migration found in fresh and brackish wetlands. Pectoral sandpiper Calidris melanotos Breeds in wet coastal tundra. Migrants are found in wet, grassy environments, including sewage ponds, plowed farm fields, sod farms, rice fields, flooded golf courses, and fresh and saltwater marshes with grassy cover. Red-headed woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds in mature deciduous woodlands that contain dead or dying trees that can act as nest cavities. Oak, oak-hickory, maple, ash, and beech are often used in the northern portion of their range. Rusty blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds in wet forests, fens, bogs, muskeg, and beaver ponds. Semipalmated sandpiper Calidris pusilla Migrants coming through Minnesota would use mudflats, lakeshores, sewage ponds, wetlands, beaches, sandbars, and freshwater impoundments. Wood thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds in mature deciduous and mixed forests with trees over 50 feet tall, a moderate understory, open forest floor with moist soil and decaying leaf litter, and nearby water. 1 This species is not listed as BBC but warrants special attention under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA). Source: Cornell Lab of Ornithology 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast 33 Environmental Assessment Worksheet One migratory bird species identified during the IPaC review, the bald eagle, has the potential to occur in the Project area. This species is not listed as BCC but warrants special attention under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA). The forested areas, wetlands, ponds, and nearby lakes may provide suitable nesting sites and foraging habitat for the bald eagle. A large stick nest with the potential to support a nesting pair of bald eagles was identified on aerial imagery and field verified in October 2024. At the time of the field visit, the nest appeared to be inactive. The nest is located just past the northern boundary of the Project area, approximately 900 ft from the Project’s disturbance area. All Project activities would avoid the regulated 660-ft buffer area required by USFWS guidelines. The forested areas, brush/grassland, cropland, wetlands, and ponds within and in the immediate vicinity of the Project area may provide nesting, foraging, and/or migration stopover habitat for all fourteen of the BCC species listed in Table 15. c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the Project including how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the Project may influence the effects. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the Project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. Impacts Analysis for Native Plant Communities and Sites of Biodiversity Significance No native plant communities, calcareous fens, MBS sites, or lakes of biological significance were identified within the Project area or within one mile of the Project area during the review of the MnDNR MCE portal in October 2024. The final MnDNR MCE response letter (Appendix E) received on October 11, 2024 also had no comments regarding ecologically significant areas. As such, no impacts are anticipated for these resources as a result of the Project. Impacts Analysis for State-Listed Species No records of rare species were identified within the Project area or within one mile of the Project area during the NHIS review conducted in October 2024. The final MnDNR MCE response letter (Appendix E) received on October 11, 2024 also had no comments regarding state-listed species. As such, no impacts are anticipated on these resources as a result of the Project. Impacts Analysis for Federally-Listed Species Salamander mussel Suitable habitat for the salamander mussel (the St Croix River or Mississippi River) is not present within or in the vicinity of the Project area. As such, no impacts are anticipated for this species as a result of the Project. Freshwater mussels are threatened by several factors, including climate change. It has been observed that warmer water temperatures lead to increased stress, slower heart rate, and decreased burrowing activity in both adult and juvenile mussels, resulting in an increased risk of predation.38F39 Western regal fritillary Suitable habitat for the western regal fritillary (native prairie) is not present within the Project area. As such, no impacts are anticipated for this species as a result of the Project. 39 Kwak, T.J., Bales, J.D., Newton, T., Cope, W.G., Heise, R.J., and Karns, B.N., 2009. Modeling the response of freshwater mussels to changes in water temperature, habitat, and streamflow. Retrieved from United States Geological Survey (USGS) Climate Adaptation Science Centers (CASC) Project Explorer: https://cascprojects.org/#/project/5050cb0ee4b0be20bb30eac0/4f833d7be4b0e84f608680d1. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 34 Environmental Assessment Worksheet The western regal fritillary relies on violets for their life cycle and their abundance is closely linked to violet density39F40,40F41. With an increase in more intense storms and droughts in Minnesota, invasive species are likely to become more dominant and push violet numbers down, thus furthering the decline of western regal fritillary habitat.41F42 Monarch butterfly Given the wide range of habitats the monarch butterfly can occupy, it may occur within the Project area, especially if milkweed is present. The removal and damage of vegetation could result in habitat loss for the monarch butterfly as well as potential individual fatalities. The monarch butterfly is a candidate for federal listing and is not currently regulated by the USFWS; therefore, impacts should be reassessed if and when a listing status is finalized. As discussed in Item 7, climate change is anticipated to result in increasing temperatures in Minnesota, which may increase the number of days and the area in which monarch butterfly populations would be exposed to unsuitably high temperatures. This can result in this species using up fat stores too quickly and may result in a misjudgment of when to enter and exit states of diapause (dormancy).42F43 Whooping crane Impacts on the whooping crane are not anticipated due to the lack of suitable habitat (prairie or coniferous forest) within the Project area. The Project area is also not within the range of the wild population of whooping crane; any unlikely occurrences of this species within the Project area would likely be from the unregulated experimental population based in Wisconsin. Based on models that consider various climate factors, it has been predicted that climate change may impact the juvenile recruitment and population growth of the whooping crane. For instance, increased precipitation during fall migration and the breeding season indicated lower recruitment and increased atmospheric carbon dioxide indicated lower population growth rates and recruitment.43F44 Impacts Analysis for Migratory Birds Construction activities and development within the Project area may result in the take of migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The MBTA makes it illegal to take (i.e., to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct) any migratory bird, or the parts, nests, or eggs of such a bird except under the terms of a valid permit issued pursuant to Federal regulations. Although the provisions of the MBTA are applicable throughout the year, most migratory bird nesting activity in Minnesota occurs approximately from May 15 to August 1. Based on the IPaC species review (Appendix E), the fourteen migratory bird species listed as USFWS BCC and one eagle species with the potential to occur in the Project area are most likely to be nesting in the Project area from March 15 to September 10. This comes with the exception of the bald eagle that is most likely to be present from December 1 to August 31 as well as the lesser yellowlegs, pectoral sandpiper, rusty blackbird, and semipalmated sandpiper that breed elsewhere. If construction activities occur within vegetated areas of the Project area, it may result in impacts to these and other migratory bird species. No impacts to the nest identified near the Project area are anticipated as the disturbance area does not intersect with the regulated 660-ft buffer. 40 Debinski, D. M., & Kelly, L. 1998. Decline of Iowa populations of the regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia) Drury. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS, 105(1), 16-22. Accessed October 2024. 41 Beilfuss, K. G., & Harrington, J. A., 2001. Distribution patterns of the Regal Fritillary butterfly (Speyeria idalia Drury) within a Wisconsin dry prairie remnant. In Proc N Am Prairie Conference (Vol. 17, pp. 191-196). Accessed October 2024. 42 Ratcliffe, Hugh. 2020. Climate Change and Tallgrass Prairies: Exploring the Interaction of Extreme Weather and Invasion in Managed Prairie Systems. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/261977. Accessed October 2024. 43 Kobilinksy, Dana. 2019. Watch: Temperature Drives Internal Clock for Monarchs. The Wildlife Society. Available at: https://wildlife.org/watch-temperature-drives-internal-clock-for-monarchs/. Accessed October 2024. 44 Butler, M. J., Metzger, K. L., & Harris, G. M., 2017. Are whooping cranes destined for extinction? Climate change imperils recruitment and population growth. Ecology and Evolution, 7(8), 2821-2834. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 35 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Impacts Analysis for Urban Wildlife Urban wildlife may be impacted by the development of the Project area, such as through the removal of trees, brush/grassland, wetlands, and ponds. Additionally, lighting and noise associated with construction have the potential to negatively impact wildlife. These species are generally adaptable to change and would likely relocate to other undeveloped areas. Invasive Species Noxious weeds and invasive species in Minnesota are managed through the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) under Minnesota Statutes Section 18.78, the MnDNR, and local ordinances. The use of best management practices during construction activities and operation within the Project area should be implemented to minimize the introduction or spread of noxious weeds and invasive species. These practices include cleaning vehicles and equipment of mud and dirt, removing seeds that attach to clothing or equipment, minimizing soil disturbance, not moving potentially contaminated materials between sites, and staying on designated roads/trails.44F45, 45F46 d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, ecosystems, and sensitive ecological resources. Sightings of any rare species during development within the Project area should be reported to the MnDNR Nongame Wildlife specialist. The Proposer would follow the guidance that is received to avoid impacts. Native seed should be considered in revegetation plans within the Project area for areas not proposed to be mowed turf grass or impervious surface in order to provide suitable habitat for pollinator species, such as the monarch butterfly, and to prevent the spread of invasive species and noxious weeds. Utilizing native seed mixes in revegetation plans may create a net positive in pollinator habitat compared to existing conditions. Herbicide, fungicide, and insecticide use within the Project area should be minimized to the extent practicable. If the application of these products is necessary during construction or operation within the Project area, then application should be limited to targeted outbreaks and would be targeted toward the nuisance species. Invasive species prevention measures should be implemented during construction to prevent the movement of invasive species on trucks, heavy equipment, off-highway vehicles, and equipment and tools to reduce the likelihood of introducing invasive species from off site. Measures may include requiring contractors and others working on site to arrive and leave with clean equipment free of visible plants, seeds, mud, and dirt clods. Other measures may include using weed-free seed and mulch products and avoiding the re-use of the top six inches of stockpiled materials (mulch, soil, gravel) that may contain more weed seeds. The results of the MnDNR NHIS review are typically valid for one year. The NHIS database should be consulted prior to the commencement of construction activities within the Project area to identify any new records of rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, or other natural features within the Project’s vicinity. 45 USDA National Invasives Species Information Center. undated(b). Best Management Practices. Available at: https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/subject/best-management-practices. Accessed October 2024. 46 MnDNR, 2024(b). Terrestrial Invasive Species. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/invasives/terrestrial/index.html. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 36 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 15. Historic Properties Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during Project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. Stantec reviewed the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (MnSHPO) previous survey report data as well as the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) Portal and the Minnesota State Historic Inventory Portal in September 2024. The literature search focused on previously identified cultural resources (archaeological sites and architectural properties) within the literature search Study Area, defined as the Project area plus a 1-mile buffer. In addition, Stantec reviewed archival resources including General Land Office (GLO) maps, county atlases, the University of Minnesota Borchert Map Library, Trygg maps, and historical aerial imagery to identify potential cultural features in the Project area. The MnModel, available on the OSA online portal, shows that the Project is located within a well surveyed area with low site potential and a poorly surveyed area with unknown site potential; however, smaller sections are mapped within a well surveyed area with high site potential. The MnModel is a data set that focuses on the number and distribution of archaeological sites and surveys, the resolution of environmental data, and the degree to which the environmental data represents the historic and prehistoric landscape to determine the probability of encountering an archaeological site. The summation of data results in four zones depicted on the map: a high sensitivity area where archaeological sites are more likely, a medium sensitivity area where sites are less likely, a low sensitivity area where sites are unlikely, and an unknown site potential in areas that have been poorly surveyed. No previously conducted archaeological surveys overlap with the Project area. Two previously conducted archaeological surveys, with the same survey boundary, overlap the Study Area (see Table 15). Table 15. Previously Conducted Archaeological Surveys in the Study Area Survey ID Title Author/Year HE-2001-04 Report on Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Conducted for the West TH 610 and East TH 610 Alternative Urban Areawide Reviews (AUARs), City of Maple Grove, Hennepin County, Minnesota Harrison/2001 HE-2005-01 Cultural Resource Investigation Conducted Along Proposed Elm Creek Interceptor Extensions – Dayton-Hassan Branch, Hassan Township and Cities of Dayton and Maple Grove, Hennepin County, Minnesota Harrison/2005 No previously recorded archaeological sites are located within the Project area. Three previously recorded archaeological sites are located in the Study Area (see Table 16). Sites 21HE0511 and 21HE0512 both represent single artifact findspots and are considered not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Site 21HE0578 is a burial site for two individuals and has not been evaluated for listing on the NRHP. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 37 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 16. Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites within the Study Area Site Number Site Name Site Type Cultural Affiliation NRHP Status 21HE0511 Schany I Single Artifact Unknown Precontact Not Eligible 21HE0512 Schany II Single Artifact Unknown Precontact Not Eligible 21HE0578 Roeder Children Burial Burial Site/Cemetery Historic Euro- American/German- American Unevaluated No previously identified burial sites/cemeteries are recorded in the Project area. Four previously identified burial sites/cemeteries are recorded within the Study Area, all of which are historic cemeteries which have not been evaluated for listing on the NRHP (see Table 17). The Roeder Children Burial corresponds with previously recorded archaeological site 21HE0578. The four cemeteries in the Study Area are protected through MS 307.08. Table 17. Previously Identified Burial Sites and Cemeteries within the Study Area Name Type NRHP Status South Maple Grove Cemetery Cemetery Unevaluated Koelher Family Cemetery Cemetery Unevaluated Immanual United Methodist Cemetery Cemetery Unevaluated Roeder Children Burial Burial Site/Cemetery Unevaluated No previously identified above ground historic resources are recorded in the Project area. There are 18 previously identified above ground historic resources recorded in the Study Area; 11 of which are considered not eligible for listing in the NRHP and seven are unevaluated (see Table 18). Table 18. Previously Identified Above Ground Historic Resources within the Study Area Resource No. Name Resource Type Address/Location NRHP Status HE-COC- 00002 Farmstead Building 9975 Highway 101 N. Unevaluated HE-COC- 00003 Farmstead Building 19301 Steig Rd. Unevaluated HE-COC- 00004 Farmstead Building 10700 Co. Hwy. 116 Unevaluated HE-COC- 00040 Maple Grove United Methodist Church Building 10025 Highway 101 Unevaluated HE-COC- 00084 House Building 19900 Hillside Drive Not Eligible HE-DYC-00016 Bridge 27946 Structure 2.7 MI SE of JCT TH 101 (carries Brockton Lane over I- 94) Unevaluated HE-DYC-00017 House Building 18130 Territorial Rd Not Eligible HE-DYC-00019 Farmstead Building 11150 Brockton Ln N Not Eligible Corcoran Industrial Northeast 38 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Resource No. Name Resource Type Address/Location NRHP Status HE-DYC-00020 Farmstead Building 11030 Holly Ln N Not Eligible HE-DYC-00021 Farmstead Building 18660 County Rd 81 Not Eligible HE-DYC-00022 Farmstead Building 18950 Territorial Rd Not Eligible HE-DYC-00023 Private Bridge Structure Farm lane over Rush Creek east of Brockton Ln Not Eligible HE-DYC-00026 D. Chase House Building 17801 Territorial Rd Unevaluated HE-MGC- 00004 Leonard Radintz Farmstead Building 17690 101st Ave. N. Unevaluated HE-MGC- 00112 Bridge L8084 Structure MSAS 130 over RUSH CREEK S FORK Not Eligible HE-RGC- 00015 House Building 11215 Brockton Ln N Not Eligible HE-RGC- 00023 Farmstead Building 19151 Territorial Rd Not Eligible XX-ROD- 00185 US Trunk Highway 52 Structure Unknown Not Eligible Historic Maps, Atlases, and Aerial Photographs Wetlands appear surrounding the Project area on the original 1855 GLO survey map.46F47 No notable structures or features appear within the Project area on the Trygg map, which is based off the original land survey notes from 1855; the northeast corner of the Project area is labeled as marsh.47F48Two structures are mapped in the Project area on the 1873 plat map of Corcoran Township, one in the NE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 1 and the other in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 1. Additionally, wetlands are indicated along the north edge of the Project area.48F49 On the 1898 plat map of Corcoran Township and the 1916 State of Minnesota plat map, one structure is mapped within the Project area in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 1. 49F50,50F51 No structures or notable features are indicated within the Project area on the 1913 Hennepin County Atlas.51F52 47 General Land Office (GLO), 1855. Original Survey, MN, 5th PM, T119N – R23W. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/survey/default.aspx?dm_id=232242&sid=esv0ej4t.mer#surveyDetailsTabIndex=1, accessed October 2024. 48 Trygg, J. William Sr., 1964. Composite Map of United States Land Surveyors’’ Original Plats and Field Notes – Sheet 7. Trygg Land Office, Ely, Minnesota. Accessed October 2024. 49 Wright, George B., 1873. Hennepin County Atlas. St. Paul Lithographic and Engraving Company, St. Paul Minnesota. https://collection.mndigital.org/catalog/mhs:865#?xywh=4778%2C-54%2C1012%2C747&cv=24, accessed October 2024. 50 Dahl, Peter M., 1898. Plat Book of Hennepin County, Corcoran Township. Northwester Map Publishing Company: E. P. Noll & Company, https://cdm16022.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/mhs/id/1260, accessed October 2024. 51 State of Minnesota, 1916. Plat Book of the State of Minnesota. Borchert Map Library, Minneapolis, MN. Electronic Document. geo.lib.umn.edu/plat_books/stateofmn1916/reference/map00953.jpg, accessed October 2024. 52 Westby, P.O., 1913. Atlas of Hennepin County Minnesota. Hennepin Atlas and Publishing Company. Minneapolis, Minnesota. https://geo.lib.umn.edu/plat_books/hennepin1913/composites/champlin_2.jpg, accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 39 Environmental Assessment Worksheet No structures are noted within the Project area on the 1909 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map, which shows the northern half of the Project area covered by wetland.52F53 One structure is noted in the SE 1/4 SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 1 on USGS topographic maps from 1958 and 1981. 53F54,54F55 A farmstead appears in the southeast corner of the Project area in aerial imagery between 1937 and 1971; the remainder of the Project area appears to be utilized for agricultural purposes.55F56 In current aerial imagery the location of the farmstead is forested, and any potential remaining structures are not visible. Conclusions Archaeology • Stantec recommends a finding of No Historic Properties Affected for the Project. No further archaeological work is recommended should the Project proceed as planned. • Should the Project require federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, a Section 106 review would be required along with consultation with the MnSHPO. Architectural • No previously identified above-ground historic resources within 1-mile of the Project area are listed on or eligible for the NRHP based on the desktop review. During the Phase I Archaeological Survey, previously uninventoried structures were identified within the Project area. Stantec recommends that the farmstead, consisting of the ruins of a house and agricultural outbuildings, lacks sufficient integrity and significance to be listed in the NRHP. Stantec recommends no historic properties would be affected. • Based on the preliminary desktop review, a historic architectural property survey was not recommended at this time. Should the Project require federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, a Section 106 review would be required along with consultation with the MnSHPO. 16. Visual Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the Project site. Describe any Project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the Project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. The current land use in the Project area and adjacent properties consist primarily of agricultural and undeveloped land with a few single family-detached homes, an industrial facility and a campground. The Project area itself currently consists of undeveloped forested land and wetlands in the north and south, an agricultural field in the center, and an abandoned farmstead in the wooded area in the southeast. No designated scenic views or vistas are present in the vicinity of the Project area. The landscape immediately surrounding the site consists of farmland to the north, east, and west; wetlands to the north and south; undeveloped forested land to the southwest; an industrial facility to the south; a few single-family homes to the east, and a campground to the southeast. The primary visual impact would be the transition of views from undeveloped forest and agriculture to an industrial facility and stormwater ponds. The Project is not expected to include industries that would emit vapor plumes. The Project area is zoned by the City of Corcoran as Light Industrial. The Project would be required to adhere to the City of Corcoran’s ordinance requirements including building height and form, landscaping, screening, lighting, etc. The Project area is also subject to the Corcoran Northeast District Guidelines, which encourages site layout and landscaping be designed to work with the existing topography, wooded areas, wetlands and natural viewshed and corridors. Wetland impacts 53 United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1909. Rockford, Minnesota 62.5k (Topographic). Electronic document, https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ht- bin/tv_browse.pl?id=f5b4890178eb72c9b12cdcf44592e3af, accessed October 2024. 54 USGS, 1958. Rockford, Minnesota 62.5k (Topographic). Electronic document https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ht- bin/tv_browse.pl?id=268f3a22beeef905275f4d3590b2670c, accessed October 2024. 55 USGS, 1981. Rogers, Minnesota 24k (Topographic). Electronic document, https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ht- bin/tv_browse.pl?id=309ed8c0fa32da0db557b903f1695547, accessed October 2024. 56 University of Minnesota, 2015. Minnesota Historic Aerial Photographs Online. University of Minnesota Libraries. Electronic document, https://apps.lib.umn.edu/mhapo/, accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 40 Environmental Assessment Worksheet and tree removal would be minimized to the extent possible, particularly to the wetlands and wooded areas in the north and south. Additional vegetative screening may be added, where appropriate. 17. Air a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the Project’s effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. Generally, industrial facilities may utilize natural gas and electric-powered equipment, which would emit low levels of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and criteria pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and particulate matter (PM). An inventory of potential electric and natural gas equipment to be installed as part of future development within the Project area is not known at this time. Generally, air emissions associated with light industrial uses are relatively insignificant and the facilities would not require an air permit. Future industrial developers within the Project area would be responsible for determining air permit applicability or exemption determinations based on the equipment to be installed with their Project prior to initiating construction. b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the Project’s traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the Project’s vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. Motorized vehicles affect air quality by emitting air borne pollutants. The changes in traffic volumes, travel patterns, and roadway locations for the Project could affect air quality by changing the number of vehicles and the congestion levels in the Project area. Criteria pollutants identified by the U.S. EPA are ozone, PM, CO, NO2, lead, and SO2. The Project area is not located in an area of nonattainment or maintenance area for any of the criteria pollutants. The Project would not include transportation improvement Projects that would be considered regionally significant per 40 CFR Part 93. Therefore, no further air quality analysis is warranted. c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during Project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 17a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the Project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. The Project is not anticipated to produce dust or odors during operation but may generate temporary dust and odors during construction. Nearby sensitive receptors would include residential neighborhoods to the north and west of the Project area. Potential odors would likely be associated with exhaust from diesel engines and fuel storage, which would be temporary. Dust generated during construction would be minimized through standard dust control measures such as applying water to exposed soils and limiting the duration of exposed soils to the extent possible. Construction contractors would be required to comply with the City’s Construction Standards which include implementing adequate dust control measures to meet all air quality regulations and minimize the potential to create a nuisance to adjacent property owners. Dust levels, after construction is complete, would be minimal as all surfaces would be paved or revegetated. With these mitigation measures in place, the quality of life for nearby residences is not anticipated to be affected. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 41 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint a. GHG Quantification: For all proposed Projects, provide quantification and discussion of Project GHG emissions. Include additional rows in the tables as necessary to provide Project-specific emission sources. Describe the methods used to quantify emissions. If calculation methods are not readily available to quantify GHG emissions for a source, describe the process used to come to that conclusion and any GHG emission sources not included in the total calculation. The GHG emissions for the Project were calculated using the Simplified Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculator (SGEC) tool and are based on the methodologies for developing a carbon footprint described in Minnesota Environmental Quality Board’s (EQB’s) EAW Guidance (June 2024). Table 19 shows the emission categories for the proposed development scenarios’ carbon footprint calculations, as provided in the EQB Guidance. Table 19. Emission Categories for Carbon Footprint Category Scope Project Phase Type of Emissions Direct Emissions Scope 1 Construction Combustion (Mobile Sources) Scope 1 Operations Combustion (Mobile Sources) Scope 1 Operations Combustion (Stationary Sources) Indirect Emissions Scope 2 Operations Off-site Electricity Scope 3 Operations Off-site Waste Management A description of the carbon footprint associated with the proposed Project is provided below. Construction Emissions GHG emissions from construction of the Project is associated with fuel combustion in the mobile construction equipment and on-road vehicles. For on-road vehicles (commuting construction workers, dump trucks and semi-trucks), emissions are calculated by estimating the number of vehicles, miles traveled (estimated to be 20 miles per day for workers, 60 miles per day for heavy duty trucks), gallons of fuel used (using default mileage rates), and emission factors from the U.S. EPA’s Emission Factors Hub. For off-road vehicles, the quantity and horsepower of cranes, backhoes, loaders, bulldozers, excavators, and skid steers was estimated based on other similar development projects. The default fuel consumption rate of 0.05 gallons per horsepower-hour is used to determine the fuel usage for all equipment. Like the on- road vehicles, emission factors from the Emission Factors Hub are used to calculate GHG emissions. Per EQB’s Revised EAW Guidance, total construction emissions for each scenario are divided by the lifetime of the project, estimated to be 50 years. Operational Emissions – Mobile Sources Average daily trips associated with each scenario are provided in Table 20. The total number of daily trips, 1,917, from the traffic study as noted in Item 20 of this EAW, was split as 20 percent of the daily trips for office employees and 80 percent of the daily trips for warehousing employees. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 42 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 20. Average Trips per Day Project Vehicle Types1 Trips /Day Office/Warehouse Workers 383 Warehouse Shipping Vehicles 1534 1 Estimated based on 1,000 employees for the Project area. For the Project, it is conservatively estimated that daily trips take place for 365 days a year. The daily commute for office and light industrial workers is estimated to be 30 miles round trip. The same distance is assumed for heavy duty shipping trucks, 30 miles per trip. Gas mileage for light duty vehicles (all types) is estimated based on the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Average Fuel Efficiency for Light Duty Vehicles. Delivery trucks and shipping vehicles are assumed to be heavy-duty diesel trucks. Gas mileage for the diesel trucks is based on U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration data from 2022. GHG emissions associated with these trips are calculated using the Emission Factors Hub. Operational Emissions – Stationary Combustion The projected natural gas usage for the buildings associated with each scenario is estimated using the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS, 2018). The CBECS provides natural gas intensities in standard cubic feet per square foot per year for several different building activity categories. Natural gas combustion GHG emissions are calculated using emission factors from the Emission Factors Hub. Operational Emissions – Offsite Electricity Production Like natural gas usage, electricity needs for the proposed buildings are estimated using the CBECS, which provides electricity usage intensity in kilowatt-hours per square foot of building space per year. GHG emissions occur offsite (Scope 2) when the electricity is generated. The SGEC tool calculates GHG emissions from electricity generation on a regional basis (defined by EPA using data from the EIA and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)), using average emission factors based on the mix of fuels used to generate the electricity in each region. For the proposed development scenarios, the Midwest Reliability Organization West (MROW) region is used. The electricity generation in MROW is comprised of approximately 50 percent fossil fuels (coal and natural gas), 9 percent nuclear and approximately 40 percent renewables (hydro, wind, and solar). Operational Emissions - Waste Management GHG emissions from waste management for both scenarios are associated with the waste generation estimates and how that waste is handled. For the Project, a waste generation rate of 6.0 lbs waste per employee per day for corporate office and 13.82 lbs waste per employee per day for warehousing employees was used, based on the CalRecycle’s Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. It is further estimated that the waste generated by the warehouse would be composed of 100 percent municipal solid waste. Applying these rates to the number of employees (a 20%/80% split or 200 for office and 800 for warehousing), yields a total waste generation rate of 1,282 tons per year. Summary A summary of GHG emissions is provided in Table 21. Emissions are presented in tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalent, which takes into account each GHG’s global warming potential (GWP). Corcoran Industrial Northeast 43 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Detailed emission calculations are provided in Appendix F Greenhouse Gas Analysis Calculations. Table 21. GHG Emissions Summary (CO2e in short tons per year) Scope Source Project Emissions Direct Emissions Scope 1 Construction – Mobile Sources1 713 Scope 1 Operations – Mobile Sources 29,520 Scope 1 Operations – Stationary Combustion 888 Indirect Emissions Scope 2 Operations – Purchased Electricity 1,777 Scope 3 Off-Site Waste Management 1,282 Total 34,178 1Note that construction emissions are annualized over the life of the project, estimated to be 50 years. b. GHG Assessment i. Describe any mitigation considered to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions. The following possible activities may be considered to help mitigate the proposed development scenarios’ GHG emissions: • Keeping as many existing trees as possible. o Proposed development within the Project area would plant 500 new trees and 1,500 new shrubs. • Energy-efficient lighting in buildings and parking lots. • Use of low carbon and energy-efficient building materials. • Installation of energy-efficient windows and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units. • Installation of low-flow fixtures and water efficient operations. • Use of renewable energy sources. ii. Describe and quantify reductions from selected mitigation, if proposed to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions. Explain why the selected mitigation was preferred. Reducing energy usage from energy-efficient lighting and building materials would reduce the GHG emissions from the proposed Project. iii. Quantify the proposed Projects predicted net lifetime GHG emissions (total tons/#of years) and how those predicted emissions may affect achievement of the Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act goals and/or other more stringent state or local GHG reduction goals. The lifetime for the proposed development scenarios is estimated at 50 years. Thus, the conservative estimates of lifetime emissions associated with the proposed development scenarios are approximately 1,708,914 tons for the Project. The proposed development scenarios’ GHG emissions would have minimal effect on the State of Minnesota’s or the local area’s GHG reduction goals. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 44 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 19. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during Project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the Project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. 1) Existing noise levels/sources in the area Existing sources of noise include traffic noise from surrounding roadways. Interstate 94 is northeast of the Project area, while public roadways CSAH 101 (Brockton Lane) and Stieg Road are to the east and south/southwest of the Project area, respectively. Some existing noise is generated from agricultural equipment near the Project area and residential noise associated with neighborhoods to the southwest and southeast of the Project area. 2) Nearby sensitive receptors Nearby sensitive receptors include residential neighborhoods to the southwest and southeast of the Project area. A campground is present east of the Project area along the west side of CSAH 101. 3) Conformance to State noise standards The State of Minnesota’s noise rules (Minn. Rules Ch. 7030) establish noise limits by noise area classifications (NACs) based on land use at the location of the person that hears noise. Table 22 identified state noise standards for each NAC. The MPCA enforces noise standards at industrial facilities for which it has issued an air permit. Given that the Project proposes light industrial development consisting of office and warehouse uses, it is not anticipated that the Project would generate operational noise that would exceed state noise standards. Table 22. Noise Area Classifications Noise Area Classification Common land use associated with the Noise Area Classification Daytime (dBA) Nighttime (dBA) L10 L50 L10 L50 1 Residential housing, religious activities, camping and picnicking areas, health services, hotels, educational services 65 60 55 50 2 Retail, business and government services, recreational activities, transit passenger terminals 70 65 70 65 3 Manufacturing, fairgrounds and amusement parks, agricultural and forestry activities 80 75 80 75 4) Quality of life During construction, noise levels would temporarily increase and vary in intensity based on the types of construction equipment being used. Table 23 summarizes expected noise levels for typical construction equipment. To minimize the effects of this noise, construction would be limited to daytime hours consistent with the City’s construction and noise ordinances. In addition, construction equipment would be fitted with mufflers that would be maintained throughout the construction process. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 45 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 23. Typical Roadway Construction Equipment Noise Levels at 50 Feet Equipment Type Manufacturers Sampled Total Number of Models in Sample Peak Noise Level Range Average Backhoe 5 6 74-92 83 Front Loader 5 30 75-96 85 Dozer 8 41 65-95 85 Grader 3 15 72-92 84 Scraper 2 17 76-98 87 Pile Driver N/A N/A 95-105 101 Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Highway Administration Following construction, noise in the area would be typical of light industrial usage. Additional traffic added to surrounding roadways is not expected to generate noise to a degree with would exceed noise standards or diminish quality of life for people living or working nearby. 20. Transportation a. Describe traffic-related aspects of Project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. 1) Existing parking spaces - 0. Proposed parking spaces - approximately 510 2) Total average daily traffic generated – 1,917 trips per day 3) Maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence – 239 trips during a.m. peak hour (7:30- 8:30 a.m.). 4) Source of trip generation rates - Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers 5) Availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes - There are no transit routes or pedestrian facilities in the study area. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 46 Environmental Assessment Worksheet b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the Project’s impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance. Stantec completed a Traffic Impact Study (summary provided in Appendix D and complete study provided in Appendix G). This appendix includes relevant figures including existing traffic volumes, future peak traffic volumes, proposed development layout, and access locations. The Traffic Impact Study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed Project at the following intersections: • CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway • CSAH 101/north access/future street (future only) • CSAH 101/south access • CSAH 101/Stieg Road • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. In accordance with MnDOT traffic study guidelines, this analysis used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of acceptable traffic operations. Table 24 and Table 25 summarize the results of the intersection operations analysis for the year 2028 and 2040 conditions, respectively. Table 24. Year 2028 No Build and Build Intersection Operations Analysis Intersection Traffic Control 2028 No Build LOS 2028 Build LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D B/C B/D CSAH 101/north access EB stop NA NA A/C A/D CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/B A/C A/B A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/C A/C A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under 2028 No Build and 2028 Build conditions. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 47 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 25. Year 2040 No Build and Build Intersection Operations Analysis Intersection Traffic Control 2040 No Build LOS 2040 Build LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/D C/D C/D C/D CSAH 101/north access EB/WB stop A/C A/E A/E E/F CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/C A/C A/C A/D CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/D A/C A/E CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal E/F D/E E/F D/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. Under 2040 No Build conditions, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Under 2040 Build conditions, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F. During the a.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS A with all movements at LOS E or better. All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate Project related transportation effects. Based on the traffic forecasts and operations analysis for each intersection, the following mitigation measures are recommended: • CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway o No improvements needed under any scenario. • CSAH 101/north access/future street o 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. o 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. • CSAH 101/south access o No improvements needed under any scenario. • CSAH 101/Stieg Road o No improvements needed under any scenario. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 48 Environmental Assessment Worksheet • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 o 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. o 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. 21. Cumulative Potential Effects (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the Project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. The Project is anticipated to be constructed in two phases starting with Phase 1 in the summer of 2025. Phase 1 would include construction of the eastern building and adjacent roadways and is expected to be complete by the summer of 2026. Phase 2 would include construction of the western building and adjacent roadways and is expected to be complete by the summer of 2027. The construction timeline is subject to change and would ultimately be driven by market demand. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future Projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed Project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. The Parkway Neighborhood residential/commercial development is proposed approximately 0.7- miles northeast from the Project area, just south of I-94 and east of CSAH 101 (Brockton Lane), in the City of Dayton. The Parkway Neighborhood residential/commercial development is proposed on approximately 67.29 acres south of I-94 in the City of Dayton, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The project is planned to include 650 medium/high-density residential units, a commercial parcel with convenience store, gas station/car wash, and service retail building(s). The project is also planned to include a connection to the Rush Creek Regional Trail, recreational area, internal roads, parks, and stormwater features. The project is anticipated to begin in fall of 2024 and be completed in phases over the next five years, dependent upon market demand. The Bellwether and Amberly residential developments are located approximately 0.7-miles southwest of the proposed Project, south of Stieg Road and west of CSAH 101. The Bellwether development, consisting of approximately 225.9 acres, includes construction of 398 homes. The Amberly development, approximately 28 acres, includes construction of 76 homes and is being constructed in conjunction with the Bellwether development. It is anticipated these developments would be completed in approximately 2027. Nelson International is a recently completed light industrial development located just south of the Project area, north of Stieg Road and west of CSAH 101. Nelson International is a full-service international truck dealership. The 35,000 square foot building allows space for truck sales and service including showroom, administrative and sales offices, maintenance, repair, and parts storage. Red Barn Pet Retreat is a dog daycare and boarding business which is expanding to a new location approximately 0.5-miles south of the proposed Project near the intersection of Stieg Road and CSAH 101. Red Barn currently operates at 19520 Stieg Road (approximately 0.7-mile from proposed Project). This new facility would allow the business to expand with 115 overnight suites, 15 playrooms, 5 exterior yards, cat boarding, retail space in the front office, and an outdoor walking path. The new location is anticipated to be open in Summer 2024 Hope Community Church is requesting to develop a 44.5 acre property in the northwest corner of CR 30 and CR 116, approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the proposed Project. The Project is a mixed-use development with multi-family housing, townhomes, senior apartments and villas, and commercial and medical office space. The Project may include approximately 738 total housing units. It is anticipated that Corcoran Industrial Northeast 49 Environmental Assessment Worksheet the Project would be constructed in four phases. The estimated project schedule is initiation in Fall 2023, with Phase I to be competed in Spring 2025. Three phases would follow through 2028, subject to market demands. The City of Corcoran would receive a dedication of land from the Project Proposer (Hempel Real Estate) for a future, City well. The schedule for development of the well remains to be determined. c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. Potential impacts that were considered as part of the cumulative potential effects evaluation include water resources, wetlands, public-infrastructure, loss of agricultural land, and transportation. Water Resources The Project would convert undeveloped agricultural land into a proposed business park, which would increase impervious surfaces compared to existing conditions. As discussed in Item 12 of this EAW, the proposed additional impervious surface area is expected to result in higher runoff rates and volumes, compared to the existing conditions, and there may also be a change in pollutants in the runoff. Other proposed developments in the area resulting in the conversion of agricultural and rural residential land to commercial, industrial and residential developments would results in similar changes. These future developments would be required to implement stormwater BMPs to mitigate stormwater runoff impacts in accordance with all City, ECWMC, and MPCA approval and permitting requirements. Therefore, adverse cumulative impacts to water quality and quantity are not anticipated. Public Infrastructure As discussed in Item 12, water supply for the Project would be provided by a new City of Corcoran treatment plant and tower that is expected to be operational mid-year 2025. The City of Maple Grove, under an existing contract with the City of Corcoran, is the current water supplier. Water supply for the Project would be consistent with the water supply planned for the Northeast Corcoran area. As discussed in Item 12, sewer and watermain improvements would be required to provide services to the Project. In order to avoid overloading the City’s existing and planned wastewater infrastructure, the Proposer would be required to limit the total wastewater volume from the fully developed parcel to not more than 1,000 gallons per day per acre (gpd/acre), consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City of Corcoran regulates future development through its land use policies and zoning requirements. Therefore, adverse cumulative impacts related to public infrastructure are not anticipated. As described in 21.b., the City of Corcoran would receive a dedication of land from the Project Proposer (Hempel Real Estate) for a future, City well. The schedule for development of the well remains to be determined; however, it would serve to meet the water needs of development within the City. Wetlands As described in Item 12, it is anticipated that the Project would impact approximately 0.3 acres of wetlands. Potential wetland impacts would be confirmed during final design and permitting of the Project. Planned development in the vicinity of the Project may also impact wetlands in the surrounding area. Wetlands are protected by state and federal laws, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and WCA, which require avoidance of wetland impacts when possible, and when avoidance is not possible, impacts must be minimized and mitigated. Adverse cumulative impacts to wetlands are not anticipated given the federal and state regulations that mandate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation requirements for wetland impacts. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 50 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Agricultural Land The Project would convert existing agricultural land to a business park development. Planned development in surrounding areas may also convert agricultural land to other land uses. The City of Corcoran guides development through the City’s land use plan and zoning codes. The Project is consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which identifies the Project area and adjacent properties for future light industrial development. The City of Corcoran through their land use policies and zoning requirements, regulates future development and can protect agricultural land from future development as appropriate. Therefore, adverse cumulative impacts to agricultural land are not anticipated. Transportation A Traffic Impact Study for the Project was completed that incorporated future traffic growth and recommended mitigation measures to address traffic impacts (Appendix G). Future developments in the surrounding area that are anticipated to increase traffic congestion, would be required to complete a traffic impact study and identify mitigation measures to address these impacts. Therefore, adverse cumulative impacts related to traffic congestion are not anticipated. 22. Other Potential Environmental Effects If the Project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. No other potential environmental effects are anticipated that are not addressed by Items 1 through 21. RGU CERTIFICATION (The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.) I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete Project; there are no other Projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the Project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Date Title 12/17/24 City Planner Appendix A Figures Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 26 25 30 29 35 36 31 32 2 1 6 5 11 12 7 8 T1 2 0 R 2 3 W T1 2 0 R 2 2 W T120 R23W T119 R23W T120 R22W T119 R22W T1 1 9 R 2 3 W T1 1 9 R 2 2 W Maple GroveCorcoran Rogers Dayton Hennepin Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area County Boundaries County Subdivision Township/Range & Section Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: USGS 3. Background: USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Project Location USGS Topo Map 1 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County Jackie L n St ieg Rd Rush C r e e k Cre e k s i d e T r l Laurel Cree k P kw y B r o c k t o n L n N D ayton P k w y113th L n Stieg Rd Elm Ln Ro b e r t L n B r o c k t on L n N 1 0 1 st A v e N 10 5th Ave 1 03 r d A v e 10 4th P l 1 0 2ndPl Ru sh C r e e k 94 D a yt o n P k w y 101s t A v eN Troy LnN Tr o y Ln N S h a d y view Ln N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:14,400 0 600 1,200 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Project Location Aerial Map 2 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County B r o c k t o n L n N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 1 8 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Wetlands Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Lampert Architects, Stantec 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:4,800 0 200 400 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-11-18T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Site Plan 3 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Br o c k t o n L a N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area TCMA Land Cover 2016 Grass/Shrub Buildings Roads/Paved Surfaces Lakes/Ponds Deciduous Tree Canopy Coniferous Tree Canopy Agriculture Emergent Wetlands Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: UMN 3. Background: TCMA 1-Meter Land Cover (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:6,000 0 250 500 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Land Cover 4 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Stie g R d Br o c k t o n L a N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Parcels Generalized Land Use 2020 Agricultural Extractive Farmstead Park, Recreational, or Preserve Retail and Other Commercial Single Family Detached Undeveloped Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Met Council 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Existing Land Use 5 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Stie g R d Br o c k t o n L a N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Parcels Generalized Planned Land Use Commercial Existing Residential Industrial Light Industrial Low - Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Mixed Residential Mixed Use Mixed Use Development Protected Resources Public/Semi-Public Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Met Council 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Proposed Land Use 6 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County §¨¦94 4567159 456781 4567116 4567101 100th Ave La w n d a l e L a Hillside Dr Darrel La Dassel La 99t h Pl 109th Ave N Troy LaN Country Cir E Br o c k t o n La N Ro b e r t L a Hun ter s Rdg CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd CS A H 8 1 H o l l y L a 101st Ave Tr o y L a Terr i t o r i a l R d StiegRd Fl e t c h e r L a Br o c k t o n L a N Maple GroveCorcoran Rogers Dayton Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 1 8 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Municipal Boundary Metro Region Parks Railroads Corcoran Planned Trails Snowmobile Trails Metro Region Trails/Bikeways Planned Existing Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MnDNR, Met Council, MnGeo, MnDOT, City of Corcoran 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:18,000 0 750 1,500 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-11-18T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Parks, Trails and Recreational Areas 7 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Stie g R d Br ock t o n L a N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Hennepin Co. Surficial Geology QI, Organic clayey silt to sand Qht - New Ulm Fm, Heiberg till Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: MGS 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Surficial Geology 8 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 L61C2 L61C2 L45A L45A L45A L45AL44A L44A L44A L44A L45A L15A L132A L60B L14A L60B L18A L22C2 L22C2 L22C2 L37B L37B L24A L23A L23A L24A L24A Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 - 2 8 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Soil Map Unit (With Map Unit Symbol) Farmland Classification All areas are prime farmland Farmland of statewide importance Not prime farmland Prime farmland if drained Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: NRCS 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:4,800 0 200 400 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-10-28T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Soil Survey 9 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County !A !A !A !A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A 4567101 00208988 00559029 00738171 00331529 00331530 00331528 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area 1/4 Mile Radius Field Verified Wells !A Domestic !A Environmental Borehole !A Abandoned Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: MDH, MWI 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW MWI Well Map 10 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County Rush Creek, South Fork (Cl-; E.coli; FishesBio; InvertBio) Rush Creek (DO; E.coli; FishesBio; InvertBio) 27031700 27031400 27030700 27024200 27029700 27030900 27011300 27031900 27031100 27016300 27011400 27031800 §¨¦94 4567116 4567117 456781 4567159 4567116 456730 4567101 Rush C r e e k (M-062-004) R ush Cr eek,Sout h F or k (M-062-004-0 02) Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area 1 Mile Radius 2024 MPCA Impaired Streams (Draft) Public Waters Watercourse Public Waters Basin NHD Flowline NHD Waterbody NWI Circular 39 Class 1 - Seasonally Flooded Basin or Flat 3 - Shallow Marsh 4 - Deep Marsh 5 - Shallow Open Water 6 - Shrub Swamp Municipal and Industrial Activities Riverine Systems Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: MPCA, MnDNR, NHD, PWI, NWI 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Water Resources 11 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Wetland 1 13.73 ac Wetland 3 5.73 ac Wetland 2 1.36 ac Wetland 5 0.03 ac Wetland 4 0.21 ac Wetland 1 0.03 ac Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 4 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Field Delineated Wetlands (21.1 ac) Proposed Wetland Impacts (0.3 ac) Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec, Sambatek, Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:4,800 0 200 400 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-11-04T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Proposed Wetland Impacts 12 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Stie g R d Br o c k t o n L a N A A RushCreek(M-062-004) Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 1 8 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Public Waters Watercourse Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: FEMA, MnDNR 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-11-18T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Flood Hazard Zones Map 13 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County !. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! # 4567101 Stie g R d Br o c k t o n L a N Tree Farm Landscape Tree Farm Landscape Nelson International Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area 1/4 Mile Radius MPCA Sites Program Name !Investigation and Cleanup !Stormwater #Tanks Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: MPCA 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW MPCA WIMN Potentially Contaminated Sites 14 Appendix B MDH Well Log Reports and Stratigraphic Records Minnesota Unique Well No. County Hennepin MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING RECORD Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031208988 Entry Date Rogers Quad ID Well Name NORTH STAR Township 119 Range Dir W Section 6 Subsection CBBCDB Jordan-Tunnel City7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Quad Well Depth Depth Completed 459016 Update 139 499910 22 A Depth to Bedrock Static Water LevelElevation950 ft.ft Use domestic 02/10/2016 UTM Northing (Y) UTM Easting (X) 08/24/1991 359 ft. Date Well Completed 359 ft. Geological Interpretation 01/01/1990 Locate MethodField Located By Elev. Method Minnesota Geological Survey Status 12/22/1970 121A Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) - NAD83 - Zone 15 - Received Date Aquifer Lic/Reg. No. 27015 Open Hole Unique No. Verified Information from owner-site John Mossler Input Source Input Date Agency (Interpretation)Interpretaion Method 222 359 -ftft60 Minnesota Geological Survey Geologic study 1:24k to 1:100k Geological Material From ToColor Hardness Thickness From To Stratigraphy Primary Lithology Secondary Minor Lithology Depth (ft.)Elevation (ft.) FINE SAND 0 32YELLOW 32 950 918 sand-yellow sand CLAY 32 60BLUE 28 918 890 clay-gray clay MUDDY SAND & GRAVEL 60 112BROWN 52 890 838 sand+silt-brown sand gravel mud MUDDY SAND & GRAVEL 112 130YELLOW 18 838 820 sand+silt-yellow sand gravel mud SHALE 130 139YELLOW 9 820 811 clay-yellow clay SANDSTONE 139 175RED 36 811 775 Jordan Sandstone sandstone SANDSTONE 175 191WHITE 16 775 759 Jordan Sandstone sandstone SANDSTONE 191 220YELLOW 29 759 730 Jordan Sandstone sandstone SANDSTONE 220 229HARDWHITE 9 730 721 Jordan Sandstone sandstone SANDSTONE 229 230HARDPINK 1 721 720 Jordan Sandstone sandstone SANDSTONE & SHALE 230 269VARIED 39 720 681 St.Lawrence shale dolomite SHALE 269 275GREEN 6 681 675 St.Lawrence shale dolomite SANDSTONE 275 359GRAY 84 675 591 Tunnel City Group sandstone shale dolomite Minnesota Well Index - Stratigraphy Report Printed on 10/09/2024208988 Minnesota Unique Well No. County Hennepin MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING RECORD Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031331528 Entry Date Rogers Quad ID Well Name B-7 Township 119 Range Dir W Section 1 Subsection AAADDB LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR) Quad Well Depth Depth Completed 458948 Update 499989 23 S Depth to Bedrock Static Water LevelElevation913 ft.ft Use abandoned 02/13/2015 UTM Northing (Y) UTM Easting (X) 02/13/2015 36 ft. Date Well Completed 36 ft. Geological Interpretation 02/13/2015 Locate MethodField Located By Elev. Method Minnesota Geological Survey Status 10/06/2014 121A Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) - NAD83 - Zone 15 - Received Date Aquifer Lic/Reg. No. 1795 Open Hole Unique No. Verified Site Plan Emily Bauer Input Source Input Date Agency (Interpretation)Interpretaion Method -ftft15 Minnesota Geological Survey Geologic study 1:24k to 1:100k Geological Material From ToColor Hardness Thickness From To Stratigraphy Primary Lithology Secondary Minor Lithology Depth (ft.)Elevation (ft.) LEAN CLAY W/SAND 0 2BLACK 2 913 911 clay+sand-black clay sand LEAN CLAY 2 4GRY/BRN 2 911 909 clay clay SANDY CLAY 4 7GRAY 3 909 906 clay+sand-gray clay sand SANDY CLAY 7 26GRAY 19 906 887 clay+sand-gray clay sand SILTY SAND 26 31GRAY 5 887 882 sand+silt-gray sand silt CLAYEY SAND 31 36GRAY 5 882 877 clay+sand-gray sand clay Minnesota Well Index - Stratigraphy Report Printed on 10/09/2024331528 Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031208988 County Hennepin Entry Date 08/24/1991 Quad Rogers Update Date 02/10/2016 Quad ID 121A Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed NORTH STAR 119 22 W 6 CBBCDB 359 ft.359 ft.12/22/1970 Elevation 950 ft.Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet)Drill Method Drill Fluid Address Use domestic Status Active Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Casing Type Single casing No Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint Well MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness FINE SAND 0 32 YELLOW CLAY 32 60 BLUE MUDDY SAND &60 112 BROWN MUDDY SAND &112 130 YELLOW SHALE 130 139 YELLOW SANDSTONE 139 175 RED SANDSTONE 175 191 WHITE SANDSTONE 191 220 YELLOW SANDSTONE 220 229 HARDWHITE SANDSTONE 229 230 HARDPINK SANDSTONE & SHALE 230 269 VARIED SHALE 269 275 GREEN SANDSTONE 275 359 GRAY Stratigraphy Information Casing Diameter Weight 8 222in. To ft. lbs./ft. Hole Diameter 8 359in. To ft. Screen?MakeType 222Open Hole From ft. To ft.359 Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) M.G.S. NO. 628. Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 208988 HE-01205-15 Printed on 10/09/2024 TUBBSPitless adapter manufacturer Model At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above grade JACUZZI Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.60 Measureland surface 12/22/1970 ft. hrs. Pumping at 125 g.p.m. feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion?Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. 12/00/1970 5 8884 Submersible Yes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Renner E.H. & Sons 27015 Remarks Jordan Sandstone Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock Tunnel City Group Minnesota Geological Survey Jordan-Tunnel 139 Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Table) System X Y459016 4999100 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 01/01/1990Information from Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031331528 County Hennepin Entry Date 02/13/2015 Quad Rogers Update Date 02/13/2015 Quad ID 121A Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed B-7 119 23 W 1 AAADDB 36 ft.36 ft.10/06/2014 Elevation 913 ft.Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR)Drill Method Drill Fluid Address Use abandoned Status Sealed Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Casing Type No Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness LEAN CLAY W/SAND 0 2 BLACK LEAN CLAY 2 4 GRY/BRN SANDY CLAY 4 7 GRAY SANDY CLAY 7 26 GRAY SILTY SAND 26 31 GRAY CLAYEY SAND 31 36 GRAY Stratigraphy Information Screen?MakeType Open Hole From ft. To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) SEALED 10-6-14 BY 1795. ORIGINAL USE-ENVIRONMENTAL BOREHOLE. Material FromAmount To bentonite ft. 36 ft.2.2 Sacks Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 331528 HE-01205-15 Printed on 10/09/2024 Pitless adapter manufacturer Model At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above grade X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.15 Measureland surface 10/06/2014 feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion?Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. Yes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller American Engineering 1795 HANSON, G. Remarks Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock clay+sand-gray Minnesota Geological Survey Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters or System X Y458948 4999895 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 02/13/2015Site Plan Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031331529 County Hennepin Entry Date 02/13/2015 Quad Rogers Update Date 10/01/2015 Quad ID 121A Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed B-5 119 22 W 6 BBBBBB 36 ft.36 ft.10/06/2014 Elevation 907 ft.Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR)Drill Method Drill Fluid Address Use environ. bore hole Status Sealed Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Casing Type No Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness PEAT 0 2 SOFTBLACK CLAYEY SAND 2 4 SOFTBROWN CLAY W/SAND 4 6 GRAY SANDY CLAY 6 17 GRAY LEAN CLAY W/SAND 17 19 GRAY SANDY CLAY 19 36 GRAY Stratigraphy Information Screen?MakeType Open Hole From ft. To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) SEALED 10-6-14 BY 1795. ORIGINAL USE-ENVIRONMENTAL BOREHOLE. Material FromAmount To bentonite ft. 36 ft.2.2 Sacks Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 331529 HE-01205-15 Printed on 11/05/2024 Pitless adapter manufacturer Model At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above grade X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.33.7 Measureland surface 11/06/2014 feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion?Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. Yes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller American Engineering 1795 HANSON, G. Remarks Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock clay+sand-gray Minnesota Geological Survey Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters or System X Y459006 5000033 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 02/13/2015Site Plan Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031331530 County Hennepin Entry Date 02/13/2015 Quad Rogers Update Date 10/01/2015 Quad ID 121A Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed B-4 119 22 W 6 BBAAAA 31 ft.31 ft.10/03/2014 Elevation 910 ft.Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR)Drill Method Drill Fluid Address Use environ. bore hole Status Sealed Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Casing Type No Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness FILL, CLAYEY SAND 0 2 SOFTBLACK SILTY SAND 2 7 DK. BRN SAND W/SILT 7 9 GRAY SANDY CLAY 9 12 GRAY SANDY CLAY 12 31 GRAY Stratigraphy Information Screen?MakeType Open Hole From ft. To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) SEALED 10-3-14 BY 1795. ORIGINAL USE-ENVIRONMENTAL BOREHOLE. Material FromAmount To bentonite ft. 31 ft.1.9 Sacks Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 331530 HE-01205-15 Printed on 11/05/2024 Pitless adapter manufacturer Model At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above grade X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.8.4 Measureland surface 10/03/2014 feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion?Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. Yes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller American Engineering 1795 HANSON, G. Remarks Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock clay+sand-gray Minnesota Geological Survey Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters or System X Y459352 5000026 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 02/13/2015Site Plan Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031559029 County Hennepin Entry Date 12/17/1996 Quad Rogers Update Date 02/18/2015 Quad ID 121A Received Date 05/10/1995 Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed PETERSON, 120 23 W 36 DCDCCA 85 ft.85 ft.03/29/1995 Elevation 915 ft.Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR)Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel Address Use domestic Status Active Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Solvent WeldedCasing Type Single casing No X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint C/W 10901 BROCKTON LA ROGERS MN Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness SAND & GRAVEL 0 5 SOFTGRY/BLK SAND 5 13 SOFTBLACK CLAY 13 53 MEDIUMGRAY SAND 53 85 SOFTBRN/YEL Stratigraphy Information Casing Diameter Weight 4 80in. To ft. lbs./ft. Hole Diameter 6.5 80in. To ft. stainlessScreen?Make JOHNSONXType Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 2 10in.ft.805 85 ft.ft. Open Hole From ft. To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) Material FromAmount To cuttings ft.30 80 ft. bentonite ft. 30 ft.2 Sacks Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 559029 HE-01205-15 Printed on 11/05/2024 MONITORPitless adapter manufacturer Model 4AO5.5 At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above gradeXX AERMOTER X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.20 Measureland surface 03/29/1995 ft.60 hrs.3 Pumping at 30 g.p.m. 50 feet South Direction Septic tank/drain field Type Well disinfected upon completion?X Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. 03/30/1995 12T50 0.5 230 1260 Submersible XYes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Mc Alpine's Well Co.27186 MCALPINE, S. Remarks Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock sand Minnesota Geological Survey Quat. buried GPS SA Off (averaged) (15 meters) System X Y458416 5000091 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 01/23/2015Address verification Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031738171 County Hennepin Entry Date Quad Rogers Update Date 11/07/2014 Quad ID 121A Received Date 01/29/2007 Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed STIEG, DENNIS 119 23 W 1 DBACBC 82 ft.82 ft.07/26/2006 Elevation 942 ft.Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR)Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite Address Use domestic Status Active Well Hydrofractured?XYes No From To GluedCasing Type Single casing No X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint Well 19320 STIEG RD CORCORAN MN 55340 Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness CLAY 0 30 MEDIUMBROWN CLAY 30 42 MEDIUMGRAY SAND & GRAVEL 42 82 SOFTBROWN CLAY 82 82 SOFTBROWN Stratigraphy Information Casing Diameter Weight 4 72 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft. Hole Diameter 6.5 82in. To ft. plasticScreen?Make BIGFOOTXType Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 4 15in.ft.7210 82 ft.ft. Open Hole From ft. To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) Material FromAmount To cuttings ft.30 72 ft. bentonite ft. 30 ft.2 Sacks Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 738171 HE-01205-15 Printed on 11/05/2024 MONITORPitless adapter manufacturer Model 4X1 SNAPPY At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above gradeX GOULDS X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.47 Measureland surface 07/26/2006 ft.72 hrs.2 Pumping at 40 g.p.m. 45 feet East Direction Sewer Type Well disinfected upon completion?X Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. 10SB07 0.75 230 1560 Submersible XYes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes X No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller JA Mcalpine Well Drilling, Inc. 1352 MCALPINE, J. Remarks Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock clay-brown Minnesota Geological Survey Quat. buried GPS SA Off (averaged) (15 meters) System X Y458378 4999104 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 08/11/2014Address verification Angled Drill Hole Appendix C WCA Notice of Decision BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 1 B Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: City of Corcoran County: Hennepin Applicant Name: Gonyea Companies – Jake Walesch Applicant Representative: Todd Ullom - Sambatek Project Name: Corcoran Industrial LGU Project No. (if any): Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 10/15/2021 Date of LGU Decision: 11/18/2021 Date this Notice was Sent: 11/29/2021 WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ☒ Wetland Boundary/Type ☐ Sequencing ☐ Replacement Plan ☐ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ☐ No-Loss (8420.0415) ☐ Exemption (8420.0420) Part: ☐ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Click here to enter text. Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits: ☐ Bank Credits: Bank Account Number(s): Click here to enter text. Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) (See attached Findings) ☒ Approve ☐ Approve w/Conditions ☐ Deny ☐ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ☐ Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 ☒ Approved1 ☐ Denied List Conditions: Decision-Maker for this Application: ☒ Staff ☐ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other: Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify): 1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project- specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1. ☐ Attachment(s) (specify): ☒ Summary: On behalf of the Applicant, Todd Ullom and JD Donath submitted a wetland delineation report for the Corcoran Industrial project located north of the Brockton Lane and Stieg Road intersection in the City of Corcoran. Four wetlands were originally delineated on site. After the field review with Lucas Mueller (LGU) and JD Donath conducted on October 22, 2021, an additional wetland was observed and added to the delineated wetlands, Wetland 2 was divided by an upland access road, and the boundary of Wetland 1 was extended outward on the east side. In addition, the LGU recommended additional offsite review areas be investigated. At the completion of the review, an additional farmed wetland was determined to be present and extend off of Wetland 1. This farmed wetland was added to the boundary of Wetland 1 and can be seen in BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 2 the revised Wetland Delineation Map. An updated figure showing the recommended changes and comments was received by Sambatek on December 15, 2021. On behalf of the City of Corcoran, the LGU approves the updated Wetland Delineation Type and Boundary application submitted by Sambatek on 12/15/2021. 1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. Attached Project Documents ☒ Site Location Map ☐ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ☐ Yes1 ☒ No 1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ☒ SWCD TEP Member: Stacey Lijewski, Hennepin SWCD ☒ BWSR TEP Member: Ben Carlson ☒ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): Lucas Mueller, Stantec ☒ DNR Representative: Wes Saunders-Pearce ☒ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Elm Creek Watershed District ☒ Applicant: Gonyea Companies – Jake Walesch ☒ Agent/Consultant: Todd Ullom and JD Donath - Sambatek Optional or As Applicable: ☒ Corps of Engineers: usace_requests_mn@usace.army.mil ☐ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ☐ Members of the Public (notice only): ☐ Other: BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 3 Signature: Date: 12/20/2021 This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. Appendix D Feasibility Study Report Corcoran Industrial Park Feasibility Study November 2024 Prepared for: City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY Table of Contents NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 i Table of Contents CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY Table of Contents NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project .......................................................................... 2.3 Table 2: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................. 2.3 Table 3: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................. 2.4 Table 4: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results ....................................................................... 2.6 Table 5: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results ....................................................................... 2.6 Table 6: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results ....................................................................... 2.6 Table 7: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results ....................................................................... 2.7 Table 8: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results ....................................................................... 2.7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Concept Plan LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Water Distribution System Modeling Appendix B Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plans Appendix C Stormwater Guidelines and Floodplain CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY 1.0 Introduction NOVEMBER 2024 1.1 INTRODUCTION The proposed project will involve the development of approximately 80 acres of land into an industrial building park. The project will include the construction of two buildings totaling over 500,000 square feet of industrial building intended for commercial distribution and manufacturing and related infrastructure to support these facilities. The proposed development is in the very NE corner of Corcoran and is located on PID 0111923110001. This Feasibility Study is the basis for identifying infrastructure improvements to support the development. The Feasibility Study is incorporated into an ongoing Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.1 TRANSPORTATION 2.1 BACKGROUND This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed project at the following intersections: · CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway · CSAH 101/north access/future street (future only) · CSAH 101/south access · CSAH 101/Stieg Road · CSAH 101/CSAH 30 2.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project will involve construction of two buildings totaling 542,200 square feet in size. For purpose of this study, the buildings are assumed to contain 108,440 square feet (20%) of office space and 433,760 square feet (80%) of manufacturing/warehouse space. Access will be provided at two locations on CSAH 101. The project is expected to be completed in 2028. 2.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed project site is currently used for agriculture purposes. The site is bounded by CSAH 101 on the east, a truck maintenance facility to the south, and agricultural uses and wetlands on the north and west. Adjacent to the project, across CSAH 101 to the east is land within the City of Maple Grove which is currently used for agricultural purposes but is guided for single family residential homes. Near the site location, CSAH 101 is a two-lane roadway with turn lanes and traffic signal control at major intersections. Dayton Parkway is a four-lane divided roadway with interchange access at I-94. Stieg Road is a two-lane local roadway which connects to CR 116 to the west. CSAH 30 is a two lane east/west roadway that expands to four lanes in Maple Grove to the east. Existing conditions near the proposed project location are described below. CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. CSAH 101/south access This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through lane. The southbound approach provides one through lane and one right turn lane. The west leg currently serves as access for an existing business. CSAH 101/Stieg Road This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through lane. The southbound approach provides one through lane and one right turn lane. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.2 CSAH 101/CSAH 30 This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. Traffic Volume Data Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at the existing intersections in September 2024. Existing traffic volume data is presented later in this report. 2.4 TRAFFIC FORECASTS To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project and other development in the area, forecasts and analyses were completed for the years 2028 and 2040. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: · 2024 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by existing uses near the project site. · 2028 No-Build. Existing volumes were increased by 2.0 percent per year to account for background growth in the surrounding area. The growth rate was based on historic growth in the area. · 2028 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2028 No-Build volumes to determine 2028 Build volumes. · 2040 No-Build. Existing volumes were increased by 2.0 percent per year to account for background growth in the surrounding area. The growth rate was based on historic growth in the area. · 2040 Build. Trips generated by the development were added to the 2040 No-Build volumes to determine 2040 Build volumes. The proposed project includes two new access points on CSAH 101 with the northern access located approximately 1,800 feet north of the south access. For purpose of this study, the access was assumed to be located across from a future new public street in Maple Grove. Traffic volumes were estimated for the new street using information presented in the Northwest – 610 Master Plan dated November 2019 developed by the City of Maple Grove with the roadway planned to be a parkway collector. The new street was assumed to be in place by 2040. Minor street stop sign control with left and right turn lanes on CSAH 101 were assumed for the initial traffic analysis at both the northern and southern access locations. The expected new development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 1. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.3 Table 1: Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Office (ITE 710) 108,440 SF 145 20 165 27 129 156 1,175 Manufacturing/Warehouse (ITE 150) 433,760 SF 57 17 74 22 56 78 742 Totals 202 37 239 49 185 234 1,917 Note: SF=square feet Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: · 65 percent to/from the east on Dayton Parkway · 10 percent to/from the north on CSAH 101 · 15 percent to/from the east on CSAH 30 · 5 percent to/from the west on CSAH 30 · 5 percent to/from the south on CSAH 101 Development trips from Table 1 were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant peak hour volumes are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CSAH 101/Dayton Pkwy EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 3 91 34 110 23 79 8 114 119 353 249 4 2028 No-Build 3 99 37 119 25 86 9 123 129 382 270 4 2028 Build 3 99 37 250 25 86 9 127 153 382 290 4 2040 No-Build 4 125 47 229 32 108 11 174 280 485 354 5 2040 Build 4 125 47 360 32 108 11 178 304 485 374 5 CSAH 101/north access/Maple Grove access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing - - - - - - - 267 - - 387 - 2028 No-Build - - - - - - - 289 - - 419 - 2028 Build 21 - 3 - - - 13 296 - - 457 113 2040 No-Build - - - 45 - 135 367 30 90 531 - 2040 Build 21 0 3 45 0 135 13 374 30 90 569 113 CSAH 101/south access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 3 - 0 - - - 2 264 - - 383 4 2028 No-Build 3 - 0 - - - 2 286 - - 415 4 CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.4 2028 Build 10 - 6 - - - 40 299 - - 418 42 2040 No-Build 4 - 0 - - - 3 392 - - 571 5 2040 Build 11 - 6 - - - 41 405 - - 574 43 CSAH 101/Stieg Road EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 21 - 31 - - - 24 245 - - 377 14 2028 No-Build 23 - 34 - - - 26 265 - - 408 15 2028 Build 23 - 34 - - - 26 316 - - 417 15 2040 No-Build 29 - 43 - - - 33 366 - - 563 19 2040 Build 29 - 43 - - - 33 417 - - 572 19 CSAH 101/CSAH 30 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 79 705 35 30 293 72 30 130 63 136 224 73 2028 No-Build 86 763 38 32 317 78 32 141 68 147 242 79 2028 Build 96 763 38 32 317 108 32 152 68 153 244 80 2040 No-Build 114 968 48 41 402 117 41 184 86 214 317 109 2040 Build 124 968 48 41 402 147 41 195 86 220 319 110 Table 3: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CSAH 101/Dayton Pkwy EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 2 42 20 73 59 218 43 310 184 181 207 4 2028 No-Build 2 45 22 79 64 236 47 336 199 196 224 4 2028 Build 2 45 22 111 64 236 47 355 319 196 229 4 2040 No-Build 3 58 27 217 81 299 59 438 331 248 302 5 2040 Build 3 58 27 249 81 299 59 457 451 248 307 5 CSAH 101/north access/Maple Grove access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing - - - - - - - 537 - - 300 - 2028 No-Build - - - - - - - 581 - - 325 - 2028 Build 104 - 11 - - - 3 616 - - 334 28 2040 No-Build - - - 30 - 90 737 45 135 412 - 2040 Build 104 0 11 30 0 90 3 772 45 135 421 28 CSAH 101/south access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 8 - 6 - - - 3 533 - - 299 2 2028 No-Build 9 - 6 - - - 3 577 - - 324 2 2028 Build 44 - 41 - - - 12 580 - - 335 11 2040 No-Build 11 - 8 - - - 4 777 - - 440 3 2040 Build 46 - 43 - - - 13 780 - - 451 12 CSAH 101/Stieg Road EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 27 - 25 - - - 34 513 - - 266 35 2028 No-Build 29 - 27 - - - 37 555 - - 288 38 2028 Build 29 - 27 - - - 37 567 - - 334 38 2040 No-Build 37 - 34 - - - 47 749 - - 395 48 CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.5 2040 Build 37 - 34 - - - 47 761 - - 441 48 CSAH 101/CSAH 30 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 142 456 18 30 592 210 33 244 44 101 123 89 2028 No-Build 154 494 19 32 641 227 36 264 48 109 133 96 2028 Build 156 494 19 32 641 234 36 267 48 137 142 105 2040 No-Build 204 626 25 41 813 315 45 344 60 157 175 128 2040 Build 206 626 25 41 813 322 45 347 60 185 184 137 2.5 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. In accordance with MnDOT traffic study guidelines, this analysis used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of acceptable traffic operations. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: · Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. · Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. · Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. · Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. · Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. · Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.6 The LOS results for the study intersections are presented below. 2024 Existing Table 4: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/B A/B CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/B A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2028 No-Build Table 5: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/south access EB Stop A/B A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB Stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2028 Build Table 6: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/north access EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/B A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. Summary: All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.7 2040 No-Build Table 7: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/D C/D CSAH 101/north access w Maple Grove access WB stop A/C A/E CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal E/F D/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. Summary: · CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. · During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. · All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2040 Build Table 8: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal C/D C/D CSAH 101/north access w Maple Grove access EB/WB stop A/E E/F CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/E CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal E/F D/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. Summary: · CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. · During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. · CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F. During the a.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS A with all movements at LOS E or better. · All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.8 Traffic Impacts Identified · CSAH 101/CSAH 30 – Intersection operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 No-Build and 2040 Build scenarios. Improvements to this intersection are necessary under the no build scenario. · CSAH 101/north access/Maple Grove access – Intersection operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 Build scenario. A signalization of this intersection should be considered. All other intersections operate at acceptable levels of service under all scenarios. 2.6 ACCESS The concept plan for the development identifies two access locations for the development that are spaced approximately 1,800 feet apart. The southern access to the development will be located along the shared lot line with the adjacent property. With the adjacent development, the turn lanes within CSAH 101 to the future public street were installed. This development shall be responsible for removing the private access and constructing a public roadway which will extend through the development. A 40’ roadway easement was provided at the time of the development to allow for the public street to be constructed centered on the shared lot line. The northern access to the development is currently proposed approximately 900 feet from the northern property line. Hennepin County will review and control the final access location, however the proposed spacing appears to be within their spacing that was reviewed and shown with the NE District Plan. Directly to the north of the proposed access is a floodplain which is a Zone A with an undefined elevation. With this development application the floodplain elevation will be determined which will help identify the limits of the floodplain within and adjacent to the proposed development. This will in turn inform the placement of the roadway as the regulatory and permitting impacts of the floodplain and stormwater management system may have impacts on the final access location. As the roadway will also align with the future Maple Grove Parkway, coordination with the City of Maple Grove and Hennepin County will be necessary to determine the final access point. 2.7 FINDINGS · The proposed development is expected to generate 239 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 234 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,917 trips daily. · Based on the traffic forecasts, operational analysis, and system review, the following improvements are recommended to accommodate the development and mitigate impacts on the transportation system.: o CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/north access/Maple Grove Access CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.9 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. o CSAH 101/south access The development shall be responsible for constructing the southern access to the development by removing the private driveway to the adjacent property and constructing a public roadway. The turn lanes from CSAH 101 onto the new access road were constructed with the previous project and no additional improvements are anticipated at this time. o CSAH 101/Stieg Road No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. These improvements are necessary of the corridor but not associated with the buildout of the development. 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 3.0 Water NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 3.1 WATER 3.1 BACKGROUND The water supply for the NE Industrial development will be provided via a 12-inch water stub available at the southeast corner of the development. The development shall be responsible for extending water infrastructure through the site. This will be connected to the Corcoran NE water system which will be serviced by the water treatment facility and water tower which are currently under construction. The findings of this report, assume that the water tower and water treatment facilities are fully operational by the time of the proposed development. As part of the development of the NE water system, a layout of proposed future well locations had identified a future well site within the development parcel to support the overall water system. A site for a future well shall be coordinated with this development and provided to the City to be constructed on in the future by the City. The well site is preferred along the western portion of the development as it will ultimately provide raw water to the new treatment facility. A corridor for future raw watermain shall be identified through the proposed development plan. The watermain through the site shall be looped through the parcel. At the NE corner of the parcel a water stub shall be provided which could be connected to the City of Maple Grove system in the future. 3.2 MODEL AND WATER SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS A map of the pipe network that was used for this modeling work is shown on Appendix A to this report. The water system performance was evaluated assuming the water service is provided by the NE Corcoran water treatment system and both the Red Barn Pet Retreat and Nelson International Trucking facilities being operational within the City water system. The water demand for the facility was assumed to be 1,500 gal/acre/day over the parcel’s net developable acreage based on the land use designation and anticipated usage. Water system was modeled for both the current water system which is proposed to utilize only a singular source from the 12- inch water stub from the south as well as the ultimate system when the 12-inch water loop is completed to the west and connected back through the Bellwether development. For commercial/industrial areas, a recommended fire flow of at least 2,500 gpm (3-hr duration) should be provided during the fire flow events with a minimum service pressure of 35 psi during the peak day demand. New commercial/industrial buildings are assumed to be sprinklered. The applicant shall review the available fire flow capacity during site planning with final users to verify fire flow capacity is acceptable for end users. During the building review process, the available fire flow should be considered by the applicant and design team to ensure that adequate fire protection is available for their facility. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 4.0 Sewer NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 4.2 Included in Appendix A of the report are the modeling results of the water system using the assumptions as outlined in this report. Below is a table which summarizes the results. The available pressure and fire flow from the existing system are adequate with greater fire capacity being provided via the ultimate looped system. The completion of the 12-inch loop may be necessary if the end users have a higher water demand than the typical land use and what was assumed in this report. Node Existing System Ultimate System Pressure (psi) Fire Flow (gpm) Pressure (psi) Fire Flow (gpm) Average Day 71-74 -- 71-74 -- Peak Hour 68-70 -- 59-62 -- Max Day 69-72 2,500-2,800 66-69 3,300-4,300 3.3 FINDINGS The following key findings and recommendation are made. Should the water demand characterization of the end users vary from the assumptions made in this report, the water system should be reviewed and additional requirements may be necessary to support users: · Looping of watermain within the development is required. Pressure and fire flow are adequate for the proposed land use. Final user shall verify that fire capacity is adequate for their facility needs. · Dedicating a lot to the City for potential future municipal well is required. Location to be determined with the southwest portion of the parcel being preferred. · A stub at the northern access street towards Maple Grove is required. Stub will terminate on western CSAH 101 ROW line. SEWER 4.1 SEWER LAYOUT Sewer service for the proposed development will be via a connection to the existing 30- inch trunk sewer located along CR 101 and the south property boundary shared with Nelson Trucking that was installed in accordance with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, A sewer stub must be constructed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan that shows a 15-inch trunk sewer stub to be extended to the west parcel line (Appendix B). CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 4.0 Sewer NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 4.3 With an industrial facility, the wastewater flow from the facility will be dependent on the final users and their specific operations within the facilities. The City Comprehensive Sewer Plan allocates 1,000 gallons per day per buildable acre from this development. To ensure the City of Corcoran collection system has capacity in accordance with the Comprehensive Sewer Plan the proposed development should be planned in accordance with this demand. If additional sewer capacity is requested of any facility users, the City shall review and determine if the overall system has the allowable capacity for those uses. Easements Permanent easements for the trunk and lateral sewers will be dedicated to the City. Where both sewer and potable water utilities are being installed in parallel, the easements must be wide enough to accommodate the required separation distance between sewer and potable water lines. Easement width is calculated using a minimum 1:1 side slope to pipe invert (for example 20 foot depth pipe requires a minimum 40 foot easement). 4.2 FINDINGS The following key findings and recommendations are made: · Developer to connect to existing trunk at location along the 30-inch trunk sewer as approved by City. · Developer to construct the 15-inch trunk sewer stub to the western property boundary. · Wastewater discharge from the development shall be in accordance with the City of Corcoran Comprehensive Sewer Plan and any deviations from that plan shall be reviewed by the City to ensure adequate capacity exists within the overall system. · Permanent easements for the trunk and lateral sewers will be dedicated to the City. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 5.0 Water Resources NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 5.1 WATER RESOURCES 5.1 REGULATORY OVERVIEW Stormwater management regulations in the proposed project area would be guided or directed by Corcoran’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (Local Plan) the City’s Guidelines, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and MS4 requirements. Each of these documents has a larger regulatory context: The Local Plan reflects the goals, policies and rules of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission’s Third Generation Watershed Management Plan (Commission’s WMP). The SWPPP is a requirement of the City’s stormwater permit, also known as the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. The MS4 permit is issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) which was reissued in October of 2021. Among other goals, both documents include plans to meet pollutant load reductions calculated in the Elm Creek Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study. TMDL studies are required for surface waters that are designated as impaired – in other words, those that do not meet one or more state water quality standards. City guidelines lay out the required modeling parameters, preferred BMPs and some construction materials. City approval is required prior to application for the WMO approval process. Further City review occurs with construction plan approval process. 5.2 WATERSHED SETTING The proposed development is situated in the Rush Creek watershed and drains west towards agricultural land and then north into the City of Rogers. Existing land use in the proposed development is agricultural and topography is gently rolling/flat. The urbanizing MUSA areas undergo changes from agricultural to non-agricultural land use that presents challenges where land use will change from row crops to commercial/industrial. Offsite Conveyances Discharge locations from the onsite BMPs will be reviewed for impact on offsite conveyances. It may be necessary to coordinate with adjacent property owners to obtain an easement, reduce velocities to lower erosion potential, construct or improve offsite conveyance to manage the developments stormwater or a combination of these approaches. Floodplain Floodplain exists on the northern portion of the property as a Zone A. The floodplain elevation shall be defined with this development, which will help inform and regulate portion of the SWMP for the facility. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 5.0 Water Resources NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 5.2 Stantec is aware of three sources of information, the Preliminary HUC-8 (2022) Study which was completed by the Elm Creek Watershed, the 2016 Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and more specific floodplain work for the Lennar development in Rogers. The watershed communities have noted that the HUC-8 had significant differences from the FIS, therefore analysis is required to determine the floodplain elevation. Hennepin County should be consulted to see if any information on the adjacent floodplains is available related to the culvert/stream crossings of CR 101. The definition of the floodplain elevation is required and adjacent stormwater BMP’s may require modifications to the site plan and CR 101 north access. Development shall be required to meet all regulatory requirements associated with the floodplain and any modifications to it. 5.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The development modifying the parcel from agricultural use to urban reduces the pervious open space and increases impervious surfaces that will impact stormwater runoff characteristics. Although elimination of agriculture can benefit water quality by reducing export of nutrients and sediments through onsite ponding and filtration (Best Management Practices or BMPs), construction of additional impervious surfaces, such as the roads, driveways, rooftops, and sidewalks increase the volume to nearby conveyances and surface waters. Mitigation is accomplished by aligning development plans with City requirements and ECWMC/MS4 stormwater regulations. Corcoran’s Local Plan, in agreement with the Commission’s WMP, requires that development plans over 1-acre disturbed area be submitted to the City and the Commission for review. The purpose of the review is to ensure that the developer’s plans for stormwater management during and after construction meet the Commission’s rules regarding the rate, volume and pollutant load of stormwater runoff, along with other rules regarding wetland alteration, erosion and sediment control and other aspects of surface water protection. The City focuses on rates of discharge, downstream impacts and long-term construction sustainability. This adherence to Commission rules on water quality (BMPs) and abstraction is one of the strategies Corcoran has chosen to also meet its TMDL obligations to reduce nutrients. The implementation plan calls on Corcoran to apply these standards when land use changes, a strategy that is predicted to have the net result of improving, or not further degrading, the water quality of stormwater runoff. Stormwater modeling guidelines are in Appendix C and may be updated prior to development’s final construction plan approval. Complementing the Local Plan, Corcoran’s SWPPP requires plan review, construction site erosion and sediment control, and post-construction stormwater management. Construction site inspections by the City will begin with land-disturbing activity and end with final stabilization of exposed soils and City acceptance of the development. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 5.0 Water Resources NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 5.3 5.4 FINDINGS Onsite · Stormwater improvements are necessary within the development to meet City guidelines and in accordance with regulations of the WMO. · To move towards meeting load reduction goals, the City’s Local Surface Water Plan identifies that improvements to water resources will occur with development. · Floodplain (Zone A) exists on the northern portion of the parcel. The floodplain elevation shall be identified and any modifications or impacts will need to be addressed during project approvals and construction. Available resources should be utilized in determining this elevation. Offsite · BMP design and hydrology review such as subwatershed contributing areas to discharge locations will be closely reviewed for potential impact to adjacent properties during platting and construction plan process. It may be necessary to coordinate with adjacent property owners to obtain an easement, reduce velocities to lower erosion potential, construct or improve offsite conveyance to manage the developments stormwater or a combination of these approaches. The City is exploring a stormwater fee that may be incorporated in 2025. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY 6.0 Funding Responsibility/Infrastructure Approach NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 6.1 FUNDING RESPONSIBILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE APPROACH The funding responsibility of the development and infrastructure necessary to mitigate impacts typically follow the approach of: · On-site infrastructure is designed, funded and constructed by the development, offsite easements and construction are typically designed as a City Project but are the funding responsibility of the development. · All trunk sewer, water fees (TLAC), and potentially stormwater area charge will be due at the time of final platting. The financial obligations of the development will be further detailed as the project moves forward and culminates in the Developer Agreement with the overall preliminary plat approval which is updated for each phase of the development. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 7.2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following infrastructure improvements are feasible and necessary to manage the development. These improvements are consistent with similar requirements for other developments in Corcoran. Transportation · Based on the traffic forecasts, operational analysis, and system review, the following improvements are recommended to accommodate the development and mitigate impacts on the transportation system.: o CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/north access/Maple Grove Access 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. o CSAH 101/south access The development shall be responsible for constructing the southern access to the development by removing the private driveway to the adjacent property and constructing a public roadway. The turn lanes from CSAH 101 onto the new access road were constructed with the previous project and no additional improvements are anticipated at this time. o CSAH 101/Stieg Road No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. These improvements are necessary of the corridor but not associated with the buildout of the development. 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. Watermain · Looping of watermain within the development is required. Pressure and fire flow are adequate for the proposed land use. Final user shall verify that fire capacity is adequate for their facility needs. · Dedicating a lot to the City for potential future municipal well is required. Location to be determined with the southwest portion of the parcel being preferred. · A stub at the northern access street towards Maple Grove is required. Stub will terminate on western CSAH 101 ROW line. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 7.3 Sewer · Developer to connect to existing trunk at location along the 30-inch trunk sewer as approved by City. · Developer to construct the 15-inch trunk sewer stub to the western property boundary. · Wastewater discharge from the development shall be in accordance with the City of Corcoran Comprehensive Sewer Plan and any deviations from that plan shall be reviewed by the City to ensure adequate capacity exists within the overall system. · Permanent easements for the trunk and lateral sewers will be dedicated to the City. Water Resources · Stormwater improvements are necessary within the development to meet City guidelines and in accordance with regulations of the WMO. · To move towards meeting load reduction goals, the City’s Local Surface Water Plan identifies that improvements to water resources will occur with development. · Floodplain (Zone A) exists on the northern portion of the parcel and any modifications or impacts will need to be addressed as the project moves through the process. Available resources should be utilized in determining this elevation. Offsite · BMP design and hydrology review such as subwatershed contributing areas to discharge locations will be closely reviewed for potential impact to adjacent properties during platting and construction plan process. It may be necessary to coordinate with adjacent property owners to obtain an easement, reduce velocities to lower erosion potential, construct or improve offsite conveyance to manage the developments stormwater or a combination of these approaches. The City is exploring a stormwater fee that may be incorporated in 2025. FIGURES PID: 0111923410002 PID: 0111923120002 D M STIEG & J M STIEG TRSTE 19500 STIEG RD, CORCORAN, MN 55374 PID: 0611922220001 DOAA M MOUSSA & A M MOUSSA 76 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED, MAPLE GROVE, MN 00000 PID: 0611922230001 THERESA PRESCOTT 10660 BROCKTON LA N, MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 PID: 0611922230004 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL LLC 10650 BROCKTON LA N, MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 PID: 0611922230005 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL LLC 76 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED, MAPLE GROVE, MN 00000 PROPOSED ±200,200 SF BUILDING PROPOSED ±342,000 SF BUILDING 100.0' 50.0' 50' WETLAND BUFFER PROPOSED 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY 100' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK PROPOSED FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY 5' PARKING SETBACK 50 . 0 ' 5.0' 26.0' 10.0' 15.0' 19.0'19.0' 26.0' 10.0' 15.0' 19.0'19.0' 26.0' 10.0' 15.0' 19.0'19.0' 26.0' 10.0' 15.0' 60.0'70.0'60.0'70.0'60.0'60.0' 30.0'26.0' 28 . 0 ' 28 . 0 ' 26.0' 193.5' 28.5' 8.3' 10.1' 26 . 0 ' 26.0' 147.1'69 . 2 ' 69 . 2 ' 217.5' 11 4 0 . 0 ' 300.0' 60' UTILITY EASEMENT 91 0 . 0 ' 220.0' 149.1' 69 . 2 ' 60.0'35.0' 30.0' PROPOSED 80' RIGHT-OF-WAY 80.0' 18 . 0 ' 22 . 0 ' EXISTING FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY 30.0 ' 78 . 5 ' 25. 0 ' 25' PARKING SETBACK 14.0' 8.0 ' 8.0 ' 8' BERM 3' BERM BIO SWALE 8' BERM 3' BERM BIO SWALE 168.6 ' 8' BERM 8. 0 ' 5. 0 ' 60.0' 20 . 0 ' PLAZA AREA 64 8 . 8 ' TO C L O S E S T S I N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E 72 . 9 ' 217.1' 12" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 12" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 12" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 12" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED BIKE RACKS PROPOSED BIKE RACKS PROPOSED BIKE RACKS PROPOSED BIKE RACKS PROPOSED BIKE RACKS PROPOSED BIKE RACKS Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 2 3 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M G: \ M a r k e t i n g \ H E M P E L \ C o r c o r a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 4 - S I T E P L A N . d w g F e b r u a r y 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 2 : 3 0 p m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R BUILDING DATA TOTAL BUILDING AREA (EAST)±300,000 SF TOTAL BUILDING AREA (WEST)±200,000 SF PERCENT OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 14.23% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 45 FT MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 70% PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED PARKING 334 SPACES @ 1/1,500 SF PROPOSED PARKING (PASSENGER)372 SPACES PROPOSED PARKING (TRAILER)138 SPACES PR E P A R E D F O R CO N C E P T S I T E PL A N EX-1A CO R C O R A N I N D U S T R I A L HE M P E L CO R C O R A N MN LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED SCREEN SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ASPHALT PAVMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION LANDSCAPE AREAS SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILS PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 80.67 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 28.78 AC (35.7%) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 51.89 AC (64.3%) AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT 21.36 AC SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPOSED ZONING I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPOSED LAND USE INDUSTRIAL BUILDING SETBACKS RIGHT OF WAY (MAJOR) = 100' RIGHT OF WAY (MINOR) = 50' STORM WATER AREA SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILS BUILDING SEE SITE PLAN FOR DETAILS PROPOSED BIO SWALE SECTION 1 N.T.S.EXISTING GROUND 8' B E R M 3' MAX 1' 1.9'10' AT 2% NORTH APPENDIX A Water Modeling Results Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567117 4567116 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 Country Cir E Ro b ert L a CR - 1 1 6 Br o c k t o n La N Darrel La Hillside D r Hu n ters R d g Dassel La Os w al d F ar m R d Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd 97th Ave N 109th Ave N Broc kton La N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e Maple Grove J-95 J-96 J-100 J-101 J-102 J-94J-103 J-158 J-182 J-183 J-185 J-186 J-187 J-188 J-189 J-190 J-191 J-192 J-245 J-246 J-247 J-248 J-249 J-254J-261 J-262 J-263 J-264 J-265 J-267 J-271 J-272 J-273 J-274 J-275 J-276 J-277J-278 J-279J-280 J-281 J-282 J-283 J-284 J-285 J-286 J-287 J-288 J-300 J-301 J-302 J-303 J-304 J-305 J-306 J-307 J-308 J-309 J-310 J-311 J-312 J-313 J-314 Northeast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Junction Water Main Diameter 6 Inch 8 Inch 10 Inch 12 Inch 16 Inch 20 Inch 24 Inch Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,000 0 375 750 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Existing System Pipe Network 1 Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567117 4567116 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 CR - 1 1 6 Br o c k t o n La N Country Cir E Ro b ert L a Alv a ra d o L a N Darrel La Hillside D r Hu n ters R d g 97th Ave N Dassel La Os w a ld F a r m R d Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd 109th Ave N Brock ton La N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n City of Maple Grove City of Corcoran City of Rogers Northeast Elevated Tank Maple GroveJ-84J-85 J-90 J-91 J-95 J-96 J-100 J-101 J-102 J-94J-103 J-158 J-182 J-183 J-185 J-186 J-187 J-188 J-189 J-190 J-191 J-192 J-245 J-246 J-247 J-248 J-249 J-254J-261 J-262 J-263 J-264 J-265 J-267 J-271 J-272 J-273 J-274 J-275 J-276 J-277J-278 J-279J-280 J-281 J-282 J-283 J-284 J-285 J-286 J-287 J-288 J-300 J-301 J-302 J-303 J-304 J-305 J-306 J-307 J-308 J-309 J-310 J-311 J-312 J-313 J-314 Northeast WTP Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Junction Water Main Diameter 6 Inch 8 Inch 10 Inch 12 Inch 16 Inch 20 Inch 24 Inch Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,000 0 375 750 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Ultimate System Pipe Network 2 Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567116 4567117 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 Country Cir E Ro b ert L a Br o c k t o n La N Alva rad o L a N Darrel La Hillside D r CR - 1 1 6 Hu n ters R d g Dassel La Osw a l d F a r m R d Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd 97th Ave N 109th Ave N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Corcoran City of Rogers 70.6 70.2 71.5 71.1 68.5 65.9 66.368.9 70.2 75.9 71.5 71.1 77.1 77.6 71.5 68.9 69.8 68.5 68.9 69.3 74.5 70.6 67.2 69.1 67.268.9 66.3 67 66.2 66.1 65.8 70.2 70.2 69.8 69.3 68.9 70.6 69.870.2 68.571.5 69.4 73.7 75 72.4 69.8 65.9 67.2 71.5 72.9 71.5 71.8 71.8 69.3 69.6 72.2 74 74 71.3 74.1 74.1 72.2 74.1 73.1 Northeast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main System Water Pressure < 35 PSI 35-50 PSI 50-65 PSI 65-80 PSI 80-95 PSI > 95 PSI Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,251 0 375 750 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Existing System Avg Day Pressure 3 System Conditions: Average day demand: 0.41 MGD Storage Tank: 5 ft below HWL # of HSP on:1 Maple Grove Connection: OFF Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567117 4567116 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 Country Cir E Ro b ert L a CR - 1 1 6 Br o c k t o n La N Darrel La Hillside D r Hu n ters R d g Dassel La Os w al d F ar m R d Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd 97th Ave N 109th Ave N Broc kton La N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000> 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 4938.2 4863.4 4794.5 4746.8 4728.9 4554.6 4552.1 4423.2 4395.7 4209 4167.3 4142 4037 3990.1 3931.9 3788.6 3683.2 3440 3398.7 3394.2 3367.5 3305.73305.5 3227.1 3193.5 3146 3146 3096.9 3089.6 3069.6 3045.2 3045.2 3007 2817.5 2809.5 2773.3 2753.1 2749.92695.5 2593 2517.3 2510.8 2470.6 2459.7 1558.9 Northeast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Fire Flow 500 - 1,000 GPM 1,000 - 2,500 GPM 2,500 - 3,500 GPM > 3,500 GPM Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,000 0 375 750 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Existing System Max Day Available Fire Flow 4 System Conditions: Max Day Demand: 1.24 MGD Storage Tank: 10 ft below HWL # of HSP on: 2 Maple Grove Connection: OFF Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567117 4567116 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 A l v ara d o L a N CR - 1 1 6 Br o c k t o n La N Country Cir E Ro b ert L a Darrel La Hillside D r Hu n ters R d g Dassel La Os w a l d F a r m R d 97th Ave N Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd 109th Ave N Br ock ton La N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Corcoran City of Rogers Northeast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP 70.468.663.5 74.6 66.1 69.9 71.2 70.8 68.3 65.7 6668.6 70 75.8 71.4 70.9 76.9 77.3 71.2 68.6 69.5 68.2 68.7 69 74.2 70.4 66.9 68.9 67.168.8 66.2 67 66.2 66.1 65.7 69.9 70 69.5 69.1 68.7 70.4 69.670 68.371.3 69.1 73.5 74.7 72.1 69.6 65.6 66.9 71.2 72.6 71.2 71.5 71.5 69.1 69.3 71.9 73.7 73.7 71 73.7 73.7 71.9 73.7 72.8 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main System Water Presure < 35 PSI < 35-50 PSI < 50-65 PSI < 65-80 PSI < 80-95 PSI < 95 PSI Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,000 0 375 750 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Ultimate System Avg Day Pressure 5 System Conditions: Average day demand: 2.28 MGD Storage Tank: 5 ft below HWL # of HSP on:1 Maple Grove Connection: OFF Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567117 4567116 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 Country Cir E Ro b ert L a CR - 1 1 6 Br o c k t o n La N Darrel La Hillside D r Hu nters R d g Dassel La Os w a l d F a r m R d Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La 97th Ave N Country Rd 109th Ave N Brock ton La N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Corcoran City of Rogers Northeast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP > 5000> 5000> 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000> 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000> 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 4929 4812.5 4749.9 4714.2 4660.3 4614.4 4539.2 4475.2 4320.9 4312.1 4239.24229.7 4173.8 4155.7 3468.1 3388.2 3387.1 3355.3 3324.6 3284.1 3115.1 2893 2736.9 2578.2 1602.6 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Fire Flow 500 - 1,000 GPM 1,000 - 2,500 GPM 2,500 - 3,500 GPM > 3,500 GPM Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,000 0 700 1,400 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Ultimate System Max Day Available Fire Flow 6 System Conditions: Max Day Demand: 6.01 MGD Storage Tank: 10 ft below HWL # of HSP on: 2 Maple Grove Connection: OFF APPENDIX B Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan !O !O !O #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake 456710 R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Trunk Water System.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:36:40 PM User: ShuJC0243 Existing WatermainProposed Watermain !O Potential Water Tower Locations #*Existing Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #*Proposed Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #* Emergency Connection withNeighboring Communities(Normally Closed) #*Potential Water Storage #*Potential Booster StationPotential Future Well Exploration AreasMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 9-2Trunk Water System 137 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Rogers DuffneyDr County Road 10 Hillside Dr Hunt ers R d g Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Schutte Farm R d H i d d e n PondsDr C herry Ln Robert Ln C ount y Road 30 J a c k i e L n Ca i n R d Schutte L n Eb e r t R d Country Rd Pat ric k Pl Lily Pond Ln Darrell Ln Osw aldFarm Rd Oakdale Dr Dassel Ln Stie g R d Shannon L n S c hu t t e Rd Rush Meadow Ln My st ique Dr 93rd Ave N S u n n y Hill L n Br a n d y w i n e R d Rush Creek SouthForkRushCreek S o u t h ForkRush Creek NE-M NE-S NE-C NE-A NE-B NE-D NE-G NE-H NE-L NE-E NE-JNE-I NE-F NE-N NE-T NE-K NE-R NE-V NE-U NE-O NE-Q NE-W NE-P SE-AP SE-AQ SE-AF 15 ' ' 30 ' ' 8' ' 8'' 30 ' ' 30'' 15 ' ' 30 ' ' 3 0 ' ' 1 0 ' ' 8' ' 10 ' ' 10'' 12 ' ' 15 ' ' 30'' 30 ' ' 12''15'' 6' ' 30'' 30 ' ' 30 ' ' NE-1 NE-2 NE-3 NE-4 NE-5 NE-6 NE-7 NE-8 NE-9 NE-10 NE-11 NE-12 NE-13 (LS) NE-14 NE-15 NE-16 NE-17 NE-18 Elm Creek Interceptor NE-19 NE-20 NE-21 NE-22 NE-23 456710 456730 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,500 0 1,500750 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\NE Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer_LS.mxd Date: 1/8/2019 Time: 7:15:58 AM User: ShuJC0243 !Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Proposed Forcemain !H Sewer Nodes (LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-2Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - NE District 115 APPENDIX C Stormwater Guidelines Stormwater Guidelines for Development March 2019 Issue Cities changing from rural to urban development are challenged by the additional stormwater generated due to construction of impervious surfaces, along with the offsite infrastructure, or lack thereof, to manage effectively. To standardize the modeling and review process, the guidelines below were created for efficiency. Note: A watershed approval is required per Elm Creek WMO rules, which also reviews flow rates, water quality and volume management. Modeling Watershed Information · Provide an aerial photo of the development that includes the overall watershed and subwatershed boundaries · Provide a summary of the acreage to each discharge point leaving the site. Any increase (or decrease) shall be identified. · Show any floodplain adjacent to project or within the project · Show downstream water bodies and flow paths o Downstream flow paths and water bodies typically need to have elevations, inverts, and condition identified. Subwatersheds A HydroCAD model (typically used) has inputs that can vary by user. To minimize resubmittals, review time and effort, the following data shall be utilized. · Electronic model shall be submitted · Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) shall be lowered one category due to the mass grading and compaction of the soils. For example, an existing B soil, shall be modeled as a proposed C soil (unless it remains undisturbed) · Wetlands, filtration basins, and ponds shall be modeled at CN of 98 · Identify peak rates for storm events and proposed shall be equal or less than existing rates. o Note: There are certain conditions where at City’s discretion the off-site conditions require a reduction in flow rate from existing rates. · SWMM (i.e. EPA-, XP-, or PC-) models can be submitted for review, however these increase review time. Model Setup for Outlet Control Structures, NWLs and Infiltration · The model’s flow control structures (OCS, culverts, etc.) shall match the construction plan information. During the plan and model review both may be modified and revised · Individual detail plates are required for each OCS, and individual plates shall have inverts identified · A pond or wetland NWL (and model starting elevation) shall be set at the constructed outlet control elevation. o No live storage shall be utilized below the controlling OCS elevation. o No live storage shall be used for filtration shelves on ponds below controlling OCS elevation · If a pond or wetland has an NWL (wet surface), infiltration shall not be used in flood routing. · If a pond has filtration BMP causing drawdown below the NWL, this drawdown elevation shall not be used as the NWL for flood routing. (Filtration has a slower release time and during wet periods is not available as live storage). Construction Plans Catch Basins · Street drainage shall be sufficient to manage the 10-year event · Typical a CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly · Three inches (0.25 feet) of head on a CB will inundate a street centerline (2% slope). · Spacing is 200 to 250 feet using longitudinal street dimensions of 40 feet from road centerline to half the house footprint (assumes rear half of house drains to rear yard). Dimensions equal 10,000 SF. · CBs may be required on both sides of ped ramps to capture flows Natural Drainage Features · Waterbodies receiving urban drainage (wetlands, ditches, gullies) may need to have OCS installed, erosion protection, or reduced flow rates to allow the feature to function over the long term due to more consistent flows from increased impervious via development · Offsite work may be necessary and City will assist with coordination, easements, etc. HWLs and EOFs · The freeboard requirements are: o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the HWL o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the EOF · EOFs shall be accurately shown and as builts are required. The highest point shall be the EOF (for example top of curb) since this is the controlling elevation o In certain instances, channel calculations of the swale may be required to show the EOF has capacity to manage estimated flow · Overland EOFs are preferred, however if a second pipe serves as an EOF then modeling will include a 100-year event using the second pipe (EOF) as the only outlet (primary outlet plugged). Rear Yards · Rear yards or swales less than 2% shall have draintile. Typically, every two to three lots will require rear yard CBs. Sump Connections · Houses adjoining a wetland or pond do not need individual sump connection · Others will have access to rear yard stormsewer. Offsite Impacts Adjacent Parcels · City will review adjacent parcels (downstream and upstream) for impacts from volume, point discharge, etc. and may require off site improvements. City will assist in coordination of any off site work. · Off site water quality improvement projects may be determined by the City for assistance with compliance with City’s TMDL approach of implementing improvements upon development. · FEMA modifications may be necessary due to development and implemented by City. Floodplain Location Appendix E NHIS Query and IPaC Species List Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 1 of 6 Formal Natural Heritage Review - Cover Page See next page for results of review. A draft watermark means the project details have not been finalized and the results are not official. Project Name: Corcoran Industrial Northeast Project Proposer: Hempel Real Estate Project Type: Development, Commercial/Institutional/Industrial Project Type Activities: Tree Removal;Grading;Structure Removal or Bridge Removal;Waterbody or watercourse impacts (e.g., dewatering, discharge, excavation, fill, runoff, sedimentation, changes in hydrology));Wetland impacts (e.g., dewatering, tiling, drainage, discharge, excavation, fill, runoff, sedimentation, changes in hydrology) TRS: T119 R23 S1, T120 R23 S36 County(s): Hennepin DNR Admin Region(s): Central Reason Requested: State EAW Project Description: Hempel Real Estate is proposing to develop Brockton Business Park, a light industrial park located in northeast Corcoran. The Project would create two ... Existing Land Uses: The Project area primarily consists of agricultural land. A farmstead is present in the southeast portion of the Project area. The remainder of the Project ... Landcover / Habitat Impacted: Land cover within the Project area consists of agricultural land, grass/shrub, wetlands, ponds, and mixed forest. Impacts to these habitats, including ... Waterbodies Affected: No lakes, rivers, or streams are located within the Project area. Approximately 18 acres of emergent wetlands and ponds are present within the Project ... Groundwater Resources Affected: The Project area is not within a Wellhead Protection Area (WPA) or a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). Impacts to groundwater are not anticipated ... Previous Natural Heritage Review: No Previous Habitat Assessments / Surveys: No SUMMARY OF AUTOMATED RESULTS Category Results Response By Category Project Details Comments Tree Removal - Recommendations Ecologically Significant Area No Comments No Further Review Required State-Listed Endangered or Threatened Species No Comments No Further Review Required State-Listed Species of Special Concern No Comments No Further Review Required 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 2 of 6 Category Results Response By Category Federally Listed Species No Records Visit IPaC For Federal Review 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 3 of 6 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological & Water Resources 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155-4025 October 11, 2024 Project ID: MCE #2024-00852 Mia Bauer Stantec One Carlson Parkway, Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55447 RE: Automated Natural Heritage Review of the proposed Corcoran Industrial Northeast See Cover Page for location and project details. Dear Mia Bauer, As requested, the above project has been reviewed for potential effects to rare features. Given the project details provided on the cover page, I do not believe the proposed project will negatively affect any known occurrences of rare features. To ensure compliance with federal law, conduct a federal regulatory review using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool. Project Type and/or Project Type Activity Comments The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) tracks bat roost trees and hibernacula plus some acoustic data, but this information is not exhaustive. Even if there are no bat records listed below, all of Minnesota’s bats, including the federally endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), can be found throughout Minnesota. During the active season (approximately April- November) bats roost underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Tree removal can negatively impact bats by destroying roosting habitat, especially during the pup rearing season when females are forming maternity roosting colonies and the pups cannot yet fly. To minimize these impacts, the DNR recommends that tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS), a collection of databases that contains information about Minnesota’s rare natural features, is maintained by the Division of Ecological and Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources. The NHIS is continually updated as new information becomes available, and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, and other natural features. However, the NHIS is not an exhaustive inventory and thus does not represent all of the occurrences of rare features within the state. Therefore, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist within the project area. If additional information becomes available regarding rare features in the vicinity of the project, further review may be necessary. 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 4 of 6 For environmental review purposes, the results of this Natural Heritage Review are valid for one year; the results are only valid for the project location and the project description provided on the cover page. If project details change or construction has not occurred within one year, please resubmit the project for review before initiating project activities. The Natural Heritage Review does not constitute project approval by the Department of Natural Resources. Instead, it identifies issues regarding known occurrences of rare features and potential impacts to these rare features. For information on the environmental review process or other natural resource concerns, you may contact your DNR Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist. Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. Sincerely, Jim Drake Jim Drake Natural Heritage Review Specialist James.F.Drake@state.mn.us Links: USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool DNR Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist Contact Info https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/ereview/erp_regioncontacts.html 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 5 of 6 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 6 of 6 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Appendix F Greenhouse Gas Analysis Calculations Scope Source CO2 (ton/yr) CH4 (ton/yr) N2O (ton/yr) CO2e (ton/yr) Scope 1 Construction - Mobile Sources Onroad - Gasoline and Diesel 107 0.0009 0.0031 108 Scope 1 Construction - Mobile Sources Non-road - Diesel 590 0.054 0.050 605 Scope 1 Operations - Stationary Combustion - Natural Gas 887 0.0168 0.00163 888 Scope 1 Operations - Mobile Sources - Gasoline and Diesel 29,290 0.209 0.819 29,520 Scope 2 Purchased Electricity 1,764 0.19 0.027 1,777 Scope 3 Waste - Operations 1,282 32,637 0.5 0.90 34,178 Lifetime 1,708,914 Total Project Emissions Corcoran NE Industiral Project GHG Emissions Summary Direct Emissions Indirect Emissions Corcoran NE Industiral Project Source ID Description Building Activity Bldg Square Footage Natural Gas Combustion (scf/yr) Electricity Usage (kWh/yr) Office Corporate office buildings Office 108,000 2,840,400 1,296,000 Light Industrial Warehouse/Light Industrial Warehouse and Storage 432,000 11,966,400 2,246,400 Total 540,000 14,806,800 3,542,400 Project Information Construction Emissions Mobile Source Information Construction 5 Years (estimate) Project Lifetime 50 Years (estimate) Onroad/Off- Road Vehicle Type1 Number of Vehicles per Day2 Fuel Type Vehicle Year3 VMT (miles per day, per vehicle)2 Miles per Gallon4 Fuel Usage (gal/day, all vehicles)Days Per Year2 Miles Traveled (mi/yr, all vehicles) Fuel Usage (gal/yr, all vehicles) Miles Traveled (mi) Fuel Usage (gal)CO2 (kg/gal)CH4 (g/mile)N2O (g/mile) CO2 (short ton) CH4 (short ton) N2O (short ton) CO2e (short ton) CO2 (short ton/yr) CH4 (short ton/yr) N2O (short ton/yr) CO2e (short ton/yr) Onroad Light Duty Vehicles - Laborers (commute)50 Gas 2011 20 21.4 46.80 260 260,000 12,168 1,300,000 60,840 8.78 0.0071 0.0046 587.59 0.0102 0.00658 590 11.8 0.00020 0.00013 11.796 Heavy Duty Trucks - Dump Trucks (onsite and offsite)20 Diesel 2011 60 7.9 151.35 260 312,000 39,350 1,560,000 196,751 10.21 0.0095 0.0431 2,209.71 0.0163 0.0740 2,232 44.2 0.00033 0.0015 44.643 Heavy Duty Trucks - Semis (onsite and offsite)20 Diesel 2011 60 6.9 173.61 260 312,000 45,138 1,560,000 225,689 10.21 0.0095 0.0431 2,534.71 0.0163 0.0740 2,557 50.7 0.00033 0.0015 51.143 Total 5,332 0.043 0.154 5,379 106.6 0.00086 0.0031 107.6 5. Emission factors based on the U.S. EPA's Emission Factors Hub (https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub, updated April 2022). Onroad/Offr oad Vehicle Type Number of Vehicles1 Fuel type Engine Size (hp)1 Consumption Rate (gal/hour per hp- hr)2 Hours per Year3 Total Gallons per Year Total Gallons for Project CO2 (kg/gal)CH4 (g/gal)N2O (g/gal) CO2 (short ton) CH4 (short ton) N2O (short ton) CO2e (short ton) CO2 (short ton/yr) CH4 (short ton/yr) N2O (short ton/yr) CO2e (short ton/yr) Off-road Crane 4 Diesel 250 0.05 2,080 104,000 520,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 5840.12 0.538 0.498 6,002 116.8 0.0108 0.0100 120.0 Backhoe 6 Diesel 125 0.05 2,080 78,000 390,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 4380.09 0.403 0.373 4,501 87.6 0.0081 0.0075 90.0 Loader 8 Diesel 250 0.05 2,080 208,000 1,040,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 11680.24 1.075 0.995 12,004 233.6 0.0215 0.0199 240.1 Excavator 4 Diesel 250 0.05 2,080 104,000 520,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 5840.12 0.538 0.498 6,002 116.8 0.0108 0.0100 120.0 Skid Steer 6 Diesel 50 0.05 2,080 31,200 156,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 1752.04 0.161 0.149 1,801 35.0 0.0032 0.0030 36.0 28 525,200 2,626,000 Total 29,493 2.715 2.513 30,309 589.9 0.05431 0.0503 606.2 1. Estimates based on similar development projects. 2. Off-road mobile source fuel usage based on South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Table A9-3E. 3. Based on 8 hr/day, 5 day/wk, 52 wk/yr. 4. Emission factors based on the U.S. EPA's Emission Factors Hub (https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub, updated April 2022). Total 2. Estimates based on similar development projects. 3. Assumed, based on the national average age of cars and light trucks on the road in 2021 (https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2022/05/24/average-american-car-12-years-old/9907901002/). 4. For light duty vehicles, based on 1995-2020: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics (Washington, DC: Annual Issues), table VM-1, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics.cfm as of October 2024. For heavy duty vehicles, average miles per gallon values from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2022 (February 2024), Table VM-1. Emission Factors4 Total Project Emissions Emissions Annualized over Project Lifetime (50 yrs) 1. Vehicle types are defined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Light duty vehicle, short wheel base replaces the old category passenger car and includes passenger cars, light trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles with a wheelbase (WB) equal to or less than 121 inches. Light duty, long wheel base replaces "Other 2-axle, 4-tire vehicle and includes large passenger cars, vans, pickup trucks, and sport/utility vehicles with wheelbases larger than 121 inches. Light Duty Vehicles includes all vehicles in the short and long wheel base category. Annual Total for Project Emission Factors5 Total Emissions (ton)Emissions Annualized over Project Lifetime (50 yrs) Scope 1 Emissions from Stationary Combustion Sources Guidance - Select "Fuel Combusted" from drop down box. (C) Biomass CO2 emissions are not reported in the total emissions, but are reported separately at the bottom of the sheet. Table 1. Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Source Source Source Fuel Fuel State Quantity ID Description Area (sq ft)Combusted (solid, liquid, gas)Combusted BLR-012 East Power Plant 12,517 Natural Gas Gas 10,000 MMBtu Office Corporate office buildings 108,000 Natural Gas Gas 2,840,400 SCF Warehouse Warehouse 432,000 Natural Gas Gas 11,966,400 SCF GHG Emissions Total Organization-Wide Stationary Source Combustion by Fuel Type Quantity Combusted Coal and Coke - Solid Anthracite Coal 0 short ton Bituminous Coal 0 short ton Sub-bituminous Coal 0 short ton Lignite Coal 0 short ton Mixed (Commercial Sector)0 short ton Mixed (Electric Power Sector)0 short ton Mixed (Industrial Coking)0 short ton Mixed (Industrial Sector)0 short ton Coal Coke 0 short ton Other Fuels - Solid Municipal Solid Waste 0 short ton Petroleum Coke (Solid)0 short ton Plastics 0 short ton Tires 0 short ton Biomass Fuels - Solid Agricultural Byproducts 0 short ton Peat 0 short ton Solid Byproducts 0 short ton Wood and Wood Residuals 0 short ton Gaseous Fuels Natural Gas 14,806,800 scf Propane Gas 0 scf Landfill Gas 0 scf Petroleum Products Distillate Fuel Oil No. 2 0 gallons Residual Fuel Oil No. 6 0 gallons Kerosene 0 gallons Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG)0 gallons Biomass Fuels - Liquid Biodiesel (100%)0 gallons Ethanol (100%)0 gallons Rendered Animal Fat 0 gallons Vegetable Oil 0 gallons Total Organization-Wide CO2, CH4 and N2O Emissions from Stationary Source Fuel Combustion CO2 (kg)CH4 (g)N2O (g) Anthracite Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Bituminous Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sub-bituminous Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lignite Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mixed (Commercial Sector)0.0 0.0 0.0 Mixed (Electric Power Sector)0.0 0.0 0.0 Mixed (Industrial Coking)0.0 0.0 0.0 Mixed (Industrial Sector)0.0 0.0 0.0 Coal Coke 0.0 0.0 0.0 Municipal Solid Waste 0.0 0.0 0.0 Petroleum Coke (Solid)0.0 0.0 0.0 Plastics 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tires 0.0 0.0 0.0 Natural Gas 806,082.2 15,251.0 1,480.7 Propane Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 Landfill Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distillate Fuel Oil No. 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Residual Fuel Oil No. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Kerosene 0.0 0.0 0.0 Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG)0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Fossil Fuel Emissions 806,082.2 15,251.0 1,480.7 Agricultural Byproducts 0.0 0.0 0.0 Peat 0.0 0.0 0.0 Solid Byproducts 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wood and Wood Residuals 0.0 0.0 0.0 Biodiesel (100%)0.0 0.0 0.0 Ethanol (100%)0.0 0.0 0.0 Rendered Animal Fat 0.0 0.0 0.0 Vegetable Oil 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Non-Fossil Fuel Emissions 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Emissions for all Fuels 806,082.2 15,251.0 1,480.7 Total CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Stationary Combustion 806.9 Total Biomass CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Stationary Combustion 0.0 Units (B) If fuel is consumed in a facility but stationary fuel consumption data are not available, an estimate should be made for completeness. See the "Items to Note" section of the Help sheet for suggested estimation approaches. Fuel Type - Enter "Quantity Combusted" and choose the appropriate units from the drop down box in the unit column. If it's necessary to convert units, common heat contents can be found on the "Heat Content" sheet and unit conversions on the "Unit Conversion" sheet. (A) Enter annual data for each combustion unit, facility, or site (by fuel type) in ORANGE cells on Table 1. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ). Fuel Type Units Petroleum Products Biomass Fuels - Liquid Coal and Coke - Solid Gaseous Fuels Biomass Fuels - Solid Other Fuels - Solid Back to Intro Back to Summary HelpHeat Content EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Direct 1.0)1 of 1 Mobile Source - Operations Onroad/Off- Road Vehicle Type1 Vehicle Driver Daily Trips2 Fuel Type Vehicle Year3 VMT (miles per trip)4 Miles per Gallon5 Fuel Usage (gal/day, all vehicles) Days Per Year6 Miles per Year (per Vehicle) Miles per Year All Vehicles Fuel Usage (gal/yr, all vehicles)CO2 (kg/gal)CH4 (g/mile)N2O (g/mile) CO2 (short ton/yr) CH4 (short ton/yr) N2O (short ton/yr) CO2e (short ton/yr) Light Duty Vehicle, Short Wheel Base (Passenger Cars, small trucks and SUVs)Office Workers 383 Gas 2011 30 21.4 537.48 365 10,950 4,198,230 196,179 8.78 0.0071 0.0046 1,899 0.03 0.02 1,906 Heavy Duty Trucks Shipping 1534 Diesel 2011 30 6.9 6667.83 365 10,950 16,792,920 2,433,757 10.21 0.0095 0.0431 27,391 0.176 0.798 27,633 Total 29,290 0.21 0.82 29,539 1. Assumes employees drive gasoline powered light duty vehicles and deliveries are made by heavy duty diesel vehicles. 2. Estimate, based on 1,917 daily trips from the traffic study split as 20% office employees and 80% warehousing employees. 4. Assumes 30 miles per trip for all vehicles. 6. Assume daily trips take place 365 days per year. Emission Factors7 Emissions Onroad 3. Assumed, based on the national average age of cars and light trucks on the road in 2021 (https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2022/05/24/average-american-car-12-years-old/9907901002/). 5. For light duty vehicles, based on 1995-2020: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics (Washington, DC: Annual Issues), table VM-1, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics.cfm as of Dec. 29, 2021. For heavy duty vehicles, average miles per gallon values from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2020 (November 2022), Table VM-1. Scope 2 Emissions from Purchase of Electricity Guidance (C) Select "eGRID subregion" from drop box and enter "Electricity Purchased." https://www.epa.gov/egrid/power-profiler#/ Tips: Enter electricity usage by location and then look up the eGRID subregion for each location. Table 1. Total Amount of Electricity Purchased by eGRID Subregion Source Source Source eGRID Subregion Electricity CO2 CH4 N2O CO2 CH4 N2O CO2 CH4 N2O ID Description Area (sq ft)where electricity is consumed Purchased Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions (kWh)(lb/MWh)(lb/MWh)(lb/MWh)(lb)(lb)(lb)(lb)(lb)(lb) Bldg-012 East Power Plant 12,517 HIMS (HICC Miscellaneous)200,000 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 226,880.0 27.0 4.2 Office Corporate office buildings 108,000 MROW (MRO West)1,296,000 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>1,290,556.8 138.7 19.4 1,290,556.8 138.7 19.4 Light Indust Warehouse/Light Industrial 432,000 MROW (MRO West)2,246,400 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>2,236,965.1 240.4 33.7 2,236,965.1 240.4 33.7 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> Total Emissions for All Sources 3,542,400 3,527,521.9 379.0 53.1 3,527,521.9 379.0 53.1 GHG Emissions CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) Location-Based Electricity Emissions 1,611.6 Market-Based Electricity Emissions 1,611.6 Notes: 1. CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions are estimated using methodology provided in EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership Greenhouse Gas Inventory Guidance - Indirect Emissions from Purchased Electricity (January 2016). (D) See the market-based emission factor hierarchy on the market-based method Help sheet. If any of the first four types of emission factors are applicable, enter the factors in the yellow cells marked as "<enter factor>". If not, leave the yellow cells as is, and eGRID subregion factors will be used for market-based emissions. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ) for a facility that purchases RECs for 100% of its consumption, and therefore has a market-based emission factor of 0. The Indirect Emissions from Purchased Electricity Guidance document provides guidance for quantifying two scope 2 emissions totals, using a location-based method and a market-based method. The organization should quantify and report both totals in its GHG inventory. The location- based method considers average emission factors for the electricity grids that provide electricity. The market-based method considers contractual arrangements under which the organization procures electricity from specific sources, such as renewable energy. - Use map (Figure 1) at bottom of sheet to determine appropriate eGRID subregion. If subregion cannot be determined from the map, find the correct subregion by entering the location's zip code into EPA’s Power Profiler: (A) Enter total annual electricity purchased in kWh and each eGRID subregion for each facility or site in ORANGE cells of Table 1. (B) If electricity consumption data are not available for a facility, an estimate should be made for completeness. See the "Items to Note" section of the Help sheet for suggested estimation approaches. If you purchase renewable energy that is less than 100% of your site's electricity, see the example in the market-based method Help sheet. Location-Based Emission Factors Emissions Emissions Market-Based Use these cells to enter applicable market-based emission factors Back to Intro Back to Summary Help Help - Market-Based Method Help - Market-Based Method EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Indirect 1.0)1 of 2 Figure 1. EPA eGRID2021, January 2023. EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Indirect 1.0)2 of 2 Scope 3 Emissions from Waste 0 0 Guidance Table 1. Waste Disposal Weight by Waste Material and Disposal Method (CO2, CH4 and N2O) Source ID Source Description Waste Material Disposal Method Weight Unit CO2e Emissions (kg) Bldg-012 East Power Plant Finished Goods Copper Wire Landfilled 1,000 metric ton 22,040 Office Corporate office buildings Mixed MSW municipal solid waste Landfilled 219 short ton 113,880 Light Industrial Warehouse/Light Industrial Mixed MSW municipal solid waste Landfilled 2,018 short ton 1,049,214 GHG Emissions Total Emissions by Disposal Method Waste Material CO2e (kg) Recycled - Landfilled 1,163,094 Combusted - Composted - Anaerobically Digested (Dry Digestate with Curing)- Anaerobically Digested (Wet Digestate with Curing)- Total CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Waste 1,163.1 (A) Enter annual waste data in ORANGE cells. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ). (B) First, choose the appropriate material then the disposal method from the drop down options. For the average-data method, use one of the mixed material types, such as mixed MSW. If the exact waste material is not available, consider an appropriate proxy. For example, dimensional lumber can be used as a proxy for wood furniture. (C) Choose an appropriate disposal method. Note that not all disposal methods are available for all materials. If there is a #NA or # Value error in the emissions column, you must pick a new material type or appropriate disposal method. Back to Intro Back to Summary Help EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Optional 3.0)1 of 1 Appendix G Traffic Impact Study File #193806190 October 29, 2024 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. One Carlson Pkwy, #100 Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Corcoran 8200 CR 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Traffic Impact Study for Corcoran Industrial NE in Corcoran, MN October 2024 i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 6-1 7.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 7-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................. 4-3 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: October 29, 2024 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 October 2024 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the impacts of an industrial development in Corcoran, MN. The project site is located west of CSAH 101 south of Dayton Parkway. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed project at the following intersections: • CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway • CSAH 101/north access/future street (future only) • CSAH 101/south access • CSAH 101/Stieg Road • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 The proposed project will involve construction of two buildings totaling 542,200 square feet in size. For purpose of this study, the buildings are assumed to contain 108,440 square feet of office space and 433,760 square feet of warehouse space. Access will be provided at two locations on CSAH 101. The project is expected to be completed in 2028. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 239 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 234 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,917 trips daily. • Overall traffic impacts: o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 – Intersection operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 No-Build and 2040 Build scenarios. o CSAH 101/north access/future street – Intersection operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 Build scenario. o All other intersections operate at acceptable levels of service under all scenarios. • Based on the traffic forecasts and operations analysis for each intersection, the following mitigation measures are recommended: o CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/north access/future street ▪ 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. ▪ 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. October 2024 1-2 o CSAH 101/south access ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/Stieg Road ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 ▪ 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. ▪ 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. October 2024 2-1 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the impacts of an industrial development in Corcoran, MN. The project site is located west of CSAH 101 south of Dayton Parkway. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed project at the following intersections: • CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway • CSAH 101/north access/future street (future only) • CSAH 101/south access • CSAH 101/Stieg Road • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve construction of two buildings totaling 542,200 square feet in size. For purpose of this study, the buildings are assumed to contain 108,440 square feet of office space and 433,760 square feet of warehouse space. Access will be provided at two locations on CSAH 101. The project is expected to be completed in 2028. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. October 2024 2-2 October 2024 2-3 October 2024 3-1 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed project site is currently used for agriculture purposes. The site is bounded by CSAH 101 on the east, an industrial use on the south, and agricultural uses and wetlands on the north and west. Near the site location, CSAH 101 is a two lane roadway with turn lanes and traffic signal control at major intersections. Dayton Parkway is a four lane divided roadway with interchange access at I-94. Stieg Road is a two lane local roadway which connects to CR 116 to the west. CSAH 30 is a two lane east/west roadway that expands to four lanes in Maple Grove to the east. Existing conditions near the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. CSAH 101/south access This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through lane. The southbound approach provides one through lane and one right turn lane. The west leg currently serves as access for an existing industrial use. CSAH 101/Stieg Road This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through lane. The southbound approach provides one through lane and one right turn lane. CSAH 101/CSAH 30 This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. Traffic Volume Data Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at the existing intersection s in September, 2024. Existing traffic volume data is presented later in this report. October 2024 3-2 October 2024 4-1 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project and other development in the area, forecasts and analyses were completed for the years 2028 and 2040. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2024 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by existing uses near the project site. • 2028 No-Build. Existing volumes were increased by 2.0 percent per year to account for background growth in the surrounding area. The growth rate was based on historic growth in the area. • 2028 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2028 No-Build volumes to determine 2028 Build volumes. • 2040 No-Build. Existing volumes were increased by 2.0 percent per year to account for background growth in the surrounding area. The growth rate was based on historic growth in the area. • 2040 Build. Trips generated by the development were added to the 2040 No-Build volumes to determine 2040 Build volumes. CSAH 101/north access/future street The proposed project includes a new access point on CSAH 101 located approximately 1,800 feet north of the south access. For purpose of this study, the access was assumed to be located across from a future new public street in Maple Grove. Traffic volumes were estimated for the new street using information presented in the Northwest – 610 Master Plan dated November 2019 developed by the City of Maple Grove. The new street was assumed to be in place by 2040. Minor street stop sign control with left and right turn lanes on CSAH 101 were assumed for the initial traffic analysis. Trip Generation for Proposed Project The expected new development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. October 2024 4-2 Table 4-1 Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour 8:30 to 9:30 a.m. Weekday PM Peak Hour 3:30 to 4:30 p.m. Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Office (ITE 710) 108,440 SF 145 20 165 27 129 156 1,175 Warehouse (ITE 150) 433,760 SF 57 17 74 22 56 78 742 Totals 202 37 239 49 185 234 1,917 Note: SF=square feet Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population con centrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 65 percent to/from the east on Dayton Parkway • 10 percent to/from the north on CSAH 101 • 15 percent to/from the east on CSAH 30 • 5 percent to/from the west on CSAH 30 • 5 percent to/from the south on CSAH 101 Traffic Volumes Development trips from Table 4-1 were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 4. October 2024 4-3 October 2024 5-1 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersection s for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. In accordance with MnDOT traffic study guidelines, this analysis used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of acceptable traffic operations. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay range s from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds f or a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. October 2024 5-2 The LOS results are described below. All LOS worksheets are included in the Appendix for further detail. 2024 Existing Weekday Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/B A/B CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/B A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2028 No-Build Weekday Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/south access Signal A/B A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road WB stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 NB stop C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2028 Build Weekday Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/north access EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/B A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. October 2024 5-3 2040 No-Build Weekday Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/D C/D CSAH 101/future street WB stop A/C A/E CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal E/F D/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2040 Build Weekday Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal C/D C/D CSAH 101/north access/future street EB/WB stop A/E E/F CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/E CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal E/F D/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F. During the a.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS A with all movements at LOS E or better. All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Overall Traffic Impacts • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 – Intersection operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 No-Build and 2040 Build scenarios. • CSAH 101/north access/future street – Intersection operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 Build scenario. • All other intersections operate at acceptable levels of service under all scenarios. October 2024 5-4 Recommended Mitigation Based on the traffic forecasts and operations analysis for each intersection, the following mitigation measures are recommended: • CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway o No improvements needed under any scenario. • CSAH 101/north access/future street o 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. o 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. • CSAH 101/south access o No improvements needed under any scenario. • CSAH 101/Stieg Road o No improvements needed under any scenario. • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 o 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. o 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. October 2024 6-1 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 239 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 234 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,917 trips daily. • Overall traffic impacts: o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 – Intersection operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 No-Build and 2040 Build scenarios. o CSAH 101/north access/future street – Intersection operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 Build scenario. o All other intersections operate at acceptable levels of service under all scenarios. • Based on the traffic forecasts and operations analysis for each intersection, the following mitigation measures are recommended: o CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/north access/future street ▪ 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. ▪ 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. o CSAH 101/south access ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/Stieg Road ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 ▪ 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. ▪ 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. October 2024 7-1 7.0 Appendix • Level of Service worksheets 3: CSAH 101 & south access 2024 AM 10/30/2024 2024 Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 2024 AM 10/30/2024 2024 Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 3: CSAH 101 & south access 2028 AM No Build 10/30/2024 2028 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 2028 AM No Build 10/30/2024 2028 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 1: CSAH 101 & noth access 2028 AM Build 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 3: CSAH 101 & south access 2028 AM Build 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 2028 AM Build 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 1: CSAH 101 & noth access/new street 2040 AM No Build 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 3: CSAH 101 & south access 2040 AM No Build 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 2040 AM No Build 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 1: CSAH 101 & noth access/new street 2040 AM Build 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 3: CSAH 101 & south access 2040 AM Build 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 2040 AM Build 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM 3: CSAH 101 & south access 10/30/2024 2024 Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 10/30/2024 2024 Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2028 PM No Build 3: CSAH 101 & south access 10/30/2024 2028 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2028 PM No Build 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 10/30/2024 2028 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2028 PM Build 1: CSAH 101 & noth access 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2028 PM Build 3: CSAH 101 & south access 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2028 PM Build 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM No Build 1: CSAH 101 & noth access 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM No Build 3: CSAH 101 & south access 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM No Build 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM Build 1: CSAH 101 & noth access 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 42.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM Build 3: CSAH 101 & south access 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM Build 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Daryl Kirschenman, PE Steve Hegland, PE File: 227705274 Date: February 3, 2025 Reference: Change Order No. 3 – Corcoran Water Tower Council Action Requested Staff is recommending City Council to review and approve Change Order No. 3 for the Corcoran Water Tower Project. This change order if a credit to re-imburse the city for additional winter installation charges of the Primary Electrical service to the water tower. Primary installation cost are $23,483.29 with additional $9,913.00 in winter installation charges. Change Order #3 The water tower contractor is working on establishing the electrical service for the water tower, which will be used to operate the lighting, tower mixers and water tower security and control system (installed as part of the water treatment project). Due to timing of the site work, the electrical service was not installed last year and is planned to be installed soon. Due to the timing, Xcel energy has charges for winter installation which is $9,913.00. Phoenix has agreed that they were late with the installation and have agreed to pay for the additional winter charges. As the City is owner of the service, they will be responsible for the service charge, including winter installation charges. Attached to this memo is Change Order No. 3 for the Corcoran Water Tower Project. This is being processed as a credit for winter charges from Xcel. Engineer’s Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council review and approve of the attached Change Order No. 3. Agenda Item 6e. EJCDC® C-941, Change Order EJCDC® C-941, Change Order, Rev.1. Copyright© 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 2 CONFORMED CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 Owner: City of Corcoran, Minnesota Owner’s Project No.: Engineer: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Engineer’s Project No.: 227705274 Contractor: Phoenix Fabricators & Erectors, LLC Contractor’s Project No.: Project: 1.0 MG Water Tower Contract Name: Corcoran 1.0 MG Water Tower Date Issued: February 3, 2025 Effective Date of Change Order: February 3, 2025 The Contract is modified as follows upon execution of this Change Order: Description: Deduct $10,000 to pay the city for winter frost charges for the installation of the electrical service during winter conditions due to late completion of painting and site work. City to pay for Primary Service. Due to late completion of site work and painting service to be installed during winter conditions. Attachments: Change Order No. 3 Memo Change in Contract Price Change in Contract Time Original Contract Price: Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion: October 1, 2024 $ 4,703,386.00 Ready for final payment: December 1, 2024 [Decrease] Previously approved Change Orders: [Increase] [Decrease] from previously approved Change Orders No.1 to No. [Number of previous Change Order]: Substantial Completion: No Change $ 18,716.92 Ready for final payment: No Change Contract Price prior to this Change Order: Contract Times prior to this Change Order: Substantial Completion: April 30, 2025 $ 4,684,669.08 Ready for final payment: June 30, 2025 [Increase][Decrease] this Change Order: [Increase] this Change Order: Substantial Completion: 0 Days $ (9,913) Ready for final payment: 0 Days Contract Price incorporating this Change Order: Contract Times with all approved Change Orders: EJCDC® C-941, Change Order EJCDC® C-941, Change Order, Rev.1. Copyright© 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 2 CONFORMED Substantial Completion: April 30, 2025 $ 4,674,756.08 Ready for final payment: June 30, 2025 Recommended by Engineer (if required) Accepted by Contractor By: Title: Date: Authorized by Owner Approved by Funding Agency (if applicable) By: Title: Date: Agenda Item 6f. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Steve Hegland, PE Nick Wyers, PE Project/File: 227704864 Date: February 4, 2025 Subject: Pay Request #7 to Fehn Companies, Inc. – Stieg Road Improvements Council Action Requested Staff is recommending the City Council Approve Pay Application #7 for the Stieg Road Improvements project to Fehn Companies, Inc. in the amount of $5,061.03. Summary Pay request #7 includes costs associated with installing permanent signage in phase 1 as well as erosion control work that was completed to stabilize the site for the winter. It is anticipated that the curb and gutter and bituminous pavement in Phase 2 as well as final restoration will be completed as soon as conditions allow in 2025. The signed pay request form and pay application is attached for review. Below is a summary of the work completed to date: Total Contract Value to Date $2,011,831.33 Work Completed to Date $1,360,467.68 5% Retainage $68,023.38 Amount Paid to Date $1,287,383.27 Total Pay App #7 $5,061.03 Engineer’s Recommendation We recommend approving Pay Request #7 to Fehn Companies, Inc. in the amount of $5,061.03. Agenda Item 6g. Pay Request #7 City of Corcoran Stieg Road Improvements Project Number: 227704864 1/31/2025 LINE NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE BASE BID: QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $47,685.00 47,685.00$ 0.75 35,763.75$ 0.75 35,763.75$ 0.0 -$ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $4,794.00 4,794.00$ 1 4,794.00$ 1.00 4,794.00$ 0.0 -$ 3 CLEARING & GRUBBING TREE 21 $715.00 15,015.00$ 42.15 30,137.25$ 42.15 30,137.25$ 0.0 -$ 4 CLEARING & GRUBBING ACRE 0.15 $15,582.00 2,337.30$ 0.15 2,337.30$ 0.15 2,337.30$ 0.0 -$ 5 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL TRAFFIC SIGN EACH 8 $255.00 2,040.00$ 3 765.00$ 0.00 -$ 3.0 765.00$ 6 REMOVE TRAFFIC SIGN AND POST EACH 2 $40.80 81.60$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 7 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 252 $4.55 1,146.60$ 116 527.80$ 116.00 527.80$ 0.0 -$ 8 REMOVE 4" DRAINTILE LIN FT 548 $3.50 1,918.00$ 548 1,918.00$ 548.00 1,918.00$ 0.0 -$ 9 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH 10 $137.70 1,377.00$ 4 550.80$ 4.00 550.80$ 0.0 -$ 10 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 10 $5.80 58.00$ 38 220.40$ 38.00 220.40$ 0.0 -$ 11 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 40 $6.95 278.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 12 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQ YD 10 $12.00 120.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 13 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 40 $6.20 248.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 14 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 110 $3.10 341.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 15 REMOVE BITUMINOUS TRAIL PAVEMENT SQ YD 100 $3.40 340.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 16 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 1190 $1.75 2,082.50$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 17 EDGE MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 50.00 $25.50 1,275.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 18 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 150 $2.00 300.00$ 85 170.00$ 85.00 170.00$ 0.0 -$ 19 REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS LUMP SUM 1 $3,060.00 3,060.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 20 4" SCHEDULE 80 CONDUIT CROSSING LIN FT 560 $11.20 6,272.00$ 370 4,144.00$ 370.00 4,144.00$ 0.0 -$ 21 RELOCATE PRIVATE IRRIGATION SYSTEM EACH 1 $3,595.00 3,595.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 22 TEMPORARY MAILBOXES LUMP SUM 1 $1,233.00 1,233.00$ 1 1,233.00$ 1.00 1,233.00$ 0.0 -$ 23 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 25 $165.00 4,125.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 24 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 50 $76.00 3,800.00$ 20 1,520.00$ 20.00 1,520.00$ 0.0 -$ 25 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOXES EACH 12 $231.00 2,772.00$ 15 3,465.00$ 15.00 3,465.00$ 0.0 -$ 26 SALAVAGE AND RELOCATE FENCE LIN FT 324 $31.00 10,044.00$ 100 3,100.00$ 100.00 3,100.00$ 0.0 -$ 27 SALVAGE AND RELOCATE HYDRANT AND VALVE EACH 1 $5,100.00 5,100.00$ 1 5,100.00$ 1.00 5,100.00$ 0.0 -$ 28 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE 5 NON-WOVEN SQ YD 16700 $2.75 45,925.00$ 16700 45,925.00$ 16,700.00 45,925.00$ 0.0 -$ 29 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (EV) CU YD 12500 $16.20 202,500.00$ 10105 163,701.00$ 10,105.00 163,701.00$ 0.0 -$ 30 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (EV) CU YD 19110 $3.75 71,662.50$ 16955 63,581.25$ 16,955.00 63,581.25$ 0.0 -$ 31 COMMON BORROW (EV)CU YD 200 $29.55 5,910.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 32 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW, 5% MODIFIED TON 7600 $11.10 84,360.00$ 7,436 82,539.60$ 7,436.00 82,539.60$ 0.0 -$ 33 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 100% CRUSHED TON 12660 $20.20 255,732.00$ 13154.71 265,725.14$ 13,154.71 265,725.14$ 0.0 -$ 34 SHOULDER BASE AGGREGATE CLASS 2, 100% CRUSHED TON 96 $37.20 3,571.20$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 35 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 802 $3.95 3,167.90$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 36 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 1930 $91.65 176,884.50$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 37 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 3850 $82.70 318,395.00$ 1173.22 97,025.29$ 1,173.22 97,025.29$ 0.0 -$ 38 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) - DRIVEWAY TON 30 $169.00 5,070.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 39 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) - TRAIL TON 420 $107.00 44,940.00$ 175.26 18,752.82$ 175.26 18,752.82$ 0.0 -$ 40 4" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAINTILE PIPE LIN FT 3810 $14.30 54,483.00$ 3696 52,852.80$ 3,696.00 52,852.80$ 0.0 -$ 41 4" PVC DRAINTILE CLEANOUT W/ THREADED CAP EACH 13 $255.00 3,315.00$ 14 3,570.00$ 14.00 3,570.00$ 0.0 -$ 42 6" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAINTILE PIPE LIN FT 75 $23.50 1,762.50$ 60 1,410.00$ 60.00 1,410.00$ 0.0 -$ 43 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 140 $73.50 10,290.00$ 33.5 2,462.25$ 33.50 2,462.25$ 0.0 -$ 44 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER - DESIGN B418 LIN FT 5220 $17.35 90,567.00$ 1958 33,971.30$ 1,958.00 33,971.30$ 0.0 -$ 45 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 940 $9.20 8,648.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 46 CONCRETE ADA PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP EACH 4 $1,020.00 4,080.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 47 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 78 $51.00 3,978.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 48 SIGN PANELS - STREET NAME EACH 8 $331.50 2,652.00$ 2 663.00$ 0.00 -$ 2.0 663.00$ 49 INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH 17 $122.40 2,080.80$ 6 734.40$ 0.00 -$ 6.0 734.40$ 50 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 120 $38.80 4,656.00$ 37.5 1,455.00$ 0.00 -$ 37.5 1,455.00$ 51 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT - MAINTAINED EACH 5 $1,491.00 7,455.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 52 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 23 $306.00 7,038.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ COMPLETED TO DATE Less Previous Payments PAY REQUEST #7 February 2025 53 CULVERT END PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 9 $76.50 688.50$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 54 SALVAGE AND RESPREAD TOPSOIL SQ YD 13310 $1.90 25,289.00$ 7918 15,044.20$ 7,918.00 15,044.20$ 0.0 -$ 55 FERTILIZER TYPE 2 LB 280 $1.10 308.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 56 HYDROMULCH SQ YD 6420 $1.10 7,062.00$ 1636 1,799.60$ 1,636.00 1,799.60$ 0.0 -$ 57 SEED MIXTURE 25-151 LB 140 $3.75 525.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 58 SEED MIXTURE 25-131 LB 60 $4.10 246.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 59 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - CATERGORY 25 SQ YD 120 $1.65 198.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 60 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 7300 $2.60 18,980.00$ 4483 11,655.80$ 4,483.00 11,655.80$ 0.0 -$ 61 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG - MAINTAINED LIN FT 1000 $2.85 2,850.00$ 1600 4,560.00$ 1,000.00 2,850.00$ 600.0 1,710.00$ 62 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 $745.00 1,490.00$ 2 1,490.00$ 2.00 1,490.00$ 0.0 -$ 63 12" PP PIPE STORM LIN FT 64 $40.80 2,611.20$ 37 1,509.60$ 37.00 1,509.60$ 0.0 -$ 64 12" METAL FLARED END SECTION EACH 4 $408.00 1,632.00$ 2 816.00$ 2.00 816.00$ 0.0 -$ 65 12" RC FLARED END SECTION W/TRASHGUARD EACH 3 $1,632.00 4,896.00$ 3 4,896.00$ 3.00 4,896.00$ 0.0 -$ 66 15" RC FLARED END SECTION W/TRASHGUARD EACH 2 $1,836.00 3,672.00$ 2 3,672.00$ 2.00 3,672.00$ 0.0 -$ 67 18" RC FLARED END SECTION W/TRASHGUARD EACH 2 $1,938.00 3,876.00$ 2 3,876.00$ 2.00 3,876.00$ 0.0 -$ 68 12" RC STORM PIPE LIN FT 523 $53.00 27,719.00$ 552 29,256.00$ 552.00 29,256.00$ 0.0 -$ 69 15" RC STORM PIPE LIN FT 740 $59.20 43,808.00$ 754 44,636.80$ 754.00 44,636.80$ 0.0 -$ 70 18" RC STORM PIPE LIN FT 427 $63.30 27,029.10$ 434 27,472.20$ 434.00 27,472.20$ 0.0 -$ 71 21" RC STORM PIPE LIN FT 143 $73.50 10,510.50$ 137 10,069.50$ 137.00 10,069.50$ 0.0 -$ 72 36" RC STORM PIPE LIN FT 13 $194.00 2,522.00$ 9 1,746.00$ 9.00 1,746.00$ 0.0 -$ 73 INSTALL PRECAST STORM STRUCTURE (SUPPLIED BY OWNER) EACH 6 $1,734.00 10,404.00$ 6 10,404.00$ 6.00 10,404.00$ 0.0 -$ 74 CONSTRUCT 4' DIAMETER PRECAST STORM STRUCTURE EACH 5 $4,182.00 20,910.00$ 5 20,910.00$ 5.00 20,910.00$ 0.0 -$ 75 CONSTRUCT 9' DIAMETER PRECAST STORM STRUCTURE EACH 1 $20,400.00 20,400.00$ 1 20,400.00$ 1.00 20,400.00$ 0.0 -$ 76 CONSTRUCT 2' x 3' CATCH BASIN EACH 5 $3,264.00 16,320.00$ 5 16,320.00$ 5.00 16,320.00$ 0.0 -$ 77 6" PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL EACH 1 $714.00 714.00$ 1 714.00$ 1.00 714.00$ 0.0 -$ 78 RANDOM CLASS 3 GRANITE RIP RAP TON 12 $110.00 1,320.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 79 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EACH 2 $2,346.00 4,692.00$ 2 4,692.00$ 2.00 4,692.00$ 0.0 -$ 80 8" PVC C-900 DR-18 WATERMAIN LIN FT 94 $60.20 5,658.80$ 98 5,899.60$ 98.00 5,899.60$ 0.0 -$ 81 12" PVC C-900 DR-18 WATERMAIN LIN FT 1358 $80.60 109,454.80$ 1358 109,454.80$ 1,358.00 109,454.80$ 0.0 -$ 82 6" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN LIN FT 3 $78.60 235.80$ 47.5 3,733.50$ 47.50 3,733.50$ 0.0 -$ 83 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX EACH 1 $6,120.00 6,120.00$ 1 6,120.00$ 1.00 6,120.00$ 0.0 -$ 84 HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE EACH 1 $9,384.00 9,384.00$ 1 9,384.00$ 1.00 9,384.00$ 0.0 -$ 85 12" PLUG WITH BLOWOFF VALVE EACH 1 $878.00 878.00$ 1 878.00$ 1.00 878.00$ 0.0 -$ 86 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 1047 $13.30 13,925.10$ 866 11,517.80$ 866.00 11,517.80$ 0.0 -$ 87 4" SOLID LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 1260 $0.75 945.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 88 4" SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 2640 $0.75 1,980.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 89 4" BROKEN LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 530 $0.75 397.50$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 90 4" DOTTED LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 160 $0.75 120.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 91 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 1540 $2.50 3,850.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 92 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 2970 $1.50 4,455.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 93 6" SOLID LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 2550 $1.40 3,570.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 94 6" SOLID LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 6920 $0.90 6,228.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 95 6" DOTTED LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 41 $1.40 57.40$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 96 24" SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 176 $19.80 3,484.80$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 97 24" SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 277 $12.00 3,324.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 98 CROSSWALK STRIPING MULTI-COMPONENT SQ FT 270 $9.90 2,673.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 99 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (WHITE) PREF THERM GROUND IN EACH 2 $525.00 1,050.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 100 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT EACH 22 $155.00 3,410.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ TOTAL BASE BID: 1,982,434.90$ 1,313,042.56$ 1,307,715.16$ 5,327.40$ TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACT: 1,982,434.90$ LINE NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE CHANGE ORDER #1 QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST CO1.1 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT EA -1 155.00$ (155.00)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.2 4" SOLID LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT LF -167 0.75$ (125.25)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.3 REMOVE HYDRANT LEAD LF 14 24.85$ 347.90$ 14 347.90$ 14.0 347.90$ 0.0 -$ CO1.4 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 12" x 6" TEE EA 1 3,456.00$ 3,456.00$ 1 3,456.00$ 1.0 3,456.00$ 0.0 -$ CO1.5 6" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN LF 21 78.60$ 1,650.60$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ COMPLETED TO DATE Less Previous Payments PAY REQUEST #7 February 2025 CO1.6 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 62 13.30$ 824.60$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.7 HYDRANT EXTENSION EA 1 3,024.00$ 3,024.00$ 1 3,024.00$ 1.0 3,024.00$ 0.0 -$ CO1.8 12" RC STORM PIPE LF 31 53.00$ 1,643.00$ 31 1,643.00$ 31.0 1,643.00$ 0.0 -$ CO1.9 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW, 5% MODIFIED TON -134 11.10$ (1,487.40)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.10 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 100% CRUSHED TON -156 20.20$ (3,151.20)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.11 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON -25 91.65$ (2,291.25)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.12 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON -50 82.70$ (4,135.00)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.13 SALVAGE AND RESPREAD TOPSOIL LS 1 1,600.00$ 1,600.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.14 SEED MIXTURE 25-151 LB 320 3.75$ 1,200.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.15 FERTILIZER TYPE 2 LB 532 1.10$ 585.20$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.16 HYDROMULCH SY 1430 1.10$ 1,573.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.17 INSTALL 6' HEIGHT CONIFEROUS TREE EA 31 533.00$ 16,523.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.18 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL FENCE LF 80 31.00$ 2,480.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.19 COMMON EXCAVATION (ONSITE)CY 2680 3.75$ 10,050.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.20 COMMON EXCAVATION (OFFSITE)CY -2680 16.20$ (43,416.00)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.21 SELEC GRANULAR BORROW ALT SOURCE TON 7600 1.50$ 11,400.00$ 7436 11,154.00$ 7,436.0 11,154.00$ 0.0 -$ TOTAL CHANGE ORDER #1 1,596.20$ 19,624.90$ 19,624.90$ -$ LINE NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE CHANGE ORDER #2 QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST CO2.1 STABILIZING AGGREGATE, 3" MINUS TON 619.71 40.60$ 25,160.23$ 619.71 25,160.23$ 619.7 25,160.23$ 0.0 -$ CO2.2 CORE DRILL DRAIN TILE HOLES EACH 6 440.00$ 2,640.00$ 6 2,640.00$ 6.0 2,640.00$ 0.0 -$ TOTAL CHANGE ORDER #2 27,800.23$ 27,800.23$ 27,800.23$ -$ TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT: 2,011,831.33$ 1,360,467.68$ 1,355,140.28$ 5,327.40$ ORIGINAL CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT 1,982,434.90$ 1,360,467.68$ 1,355,140.28$ 5,327.40$ TOTAL CHANGE ORDER:29,396.43$ CURRENT RETAINAGE (5%)68,023.38$ 67,757.01$ 266.37$ TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT:2,011,831.33$ TOTAL CURRENT PAY REQUEST 1,292,444.30$ 1,287,383.27$ 5,061.03$ PAY REQUEST #7 February 2025 SUBTOTAL CONTRACT SUMMARY COMPLETE TO DATE LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS COMPLETED TO DATE Less Previous Payments PAY REQUEST #7 SECTION 00 62 76 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT FORM OWNER: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: 7 Original Contract Amount: Contract Changes approved to Date CO #1 CO #2 Revised Contract Price : Work Completed to Date (attached): Retainage to Date, 5%: Work Completed to Date Less Retainage to Date: Total Amount Previously Certified: Payment Request This Estimate: CONTRACTOR Application for Payment Form Project No. 227704864 00 62 76-1 PAY ESTIMATE NO. I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid. 1,982,434.90$ 1,596.20$ 2,011,831.33$ 1,360,467.68$ 1,287,383.27$ 5,061.03$ 27,800.23$ City of Corcoran Fehn Companies, Inc. 68,023.38$ 1,292,444.30$ Stieg Road Improvements Fehn Companies, Inc. and Fehn Companies (CONTRACTOR) and all authorized changes therto: By Title Approval: (CONTRACTOR)Date Date CITY OF CORCORAN Date Application for Payment Form Project No. 227704864 00 62 76-2 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. END OF SECTION CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR I hereby certify that the work and the materials supplied to date, as shown on the request for payment, represents the actual value of accomplishment under the terms of the contract between the City of Corcoran (OWNER) Fehn Companies, Inc. Tony Paumen Senior Project Manager 02-03-25 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Ash Hammerbeck, PE Steve Hegland, PE Project/File: 227704426 Date: February 3, 2024 Subject: Corcoran WTP - Pay Application #21 Council Action Requested Staff is recommending Council approve Pay Application #21 for the Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Project to Rice Lake Construction Group in the amount of $589,997.50. Summary Rice Lake continued work on the project including the blower startup and owner training, sanding and patching walls, ceiling paint and caulking, aerator connection, doors and windows, painting, process pipes, fittings, valves, and accessories, plumbing fixtures and fittings, plant controls, interior fixtures and lamps, distribution equipment, and obtaining the necessary utilities and materials. The pay application includes work done to install the plant controls, electrical wiring, connections and hardware along with process pipe fittings and proper sealer and insulation. This pay request is for the work performed through 01/31/2025. The signed payment request form and pay application is attached for review. Total Contract Value to Date $ 16,944,562.26 Work Completed to Date $ 15,685,092.29 5% Retainage $ 784,254.61 Amount Paid to Date $ 14,310,840.18 Total Pay App #21 $ 589,997.50 Engineer’s Recommendation We have reviewed the request and recommend approving Pay Application #21 to Rice Lake Construction Group in the amount of $589,997.50 for the work completed and materials stored to date. Agenda Item 6h. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Steve Hegland, PE Nick Wyers, PE Project/File: 227704908 Date: January 27, 2025 Subject: Pay Request to Blackstone Contractors LLC for Horseshoe Bend Drive Council Action Requested Staff is recommending the City Council approve the following pay application for Horseshoe Bend to Blackstone Contractors LLC in the amount of $28,378.56. Summary This fall, the City of Corcoran approved Blackstone Contractors LLC to complete additional restoration work along the ditch of Horseshoe Bend. The contractor Blackstone Contractors LLC quoted and completed the additional work required to improve the condition of the ditch including the extension of 24 and 30” culverts, ditch excavation, armoring the bottom of the ditch with 3” rock, and restoration. The signed payment request form and pay application is attached for review. As this work is related to the Horseshoe Bend project which was a part of the 2023a Bond, proceeds from that bond are anticipated to be used towards this payment. Below is a summary of the work completed to date: Total Contract Value to Date $28,378.56 Work Completed to Date $28,378.56 0% Retainage $0.00 Amount Paid to Date $0.00 Total Pay Application $28,378.56 Engineer’s Recommendation We recommend approving this Pay Request to Blackstone Contractors LLC in the amount of $28,378.56. Agenda Item 6i. LINE NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 1,426.00$ 1,426.00$ 1 1,426.00$ 0.0 -$ 1.00 1,426.00$ 2 Extend 30" HDPE Culvert 8 LF LUMP SUM 1 2,770.00$ 2,770.00$ 1 2,770.00$ 0.0 -$ 1.00 2,770.00$ 3 Extend 24" HDPE Culvert 32 LF LUMP SUM 1 5,340.00$ 5,340.00$ 1 5,340.00$ 0.0 -$ 1.00 5,340.00$ 4 Common Fill CU YD 50 58.40$ 2,920.00$ 50 2,920.00$ 0.0 -$ 50.00 2,920.00$ 5 Topsoil CU YD 28 57.50$ 1,610.00$ 28 1,610.00$ 0.0 -$ 28.00 1,610.00$ 6 Seeding Restoration SQ YD 250 7.68$ 1,920.00$ 250 1,920.00$ 0.0 -$ 250.00 1,920.00$ 7 Ditch Excavation LIN FT 200 28.40$ 5,680.00$ 200 5,680.00$ 0.0 -$ 200.00 5,680.00$ 8 Ditch Armoring, 3" Rock Granite LIN FT 200 27.30$ 5,460.00$ 200 5,460.00$ 0.0 -$ 200.00 5,460.00$ 9 Ditch Seeding SQ YD 136 9.21$ 1,252.56$ 136 1,252.56$ 0.0 -$ 136.00 1,252.56$ TOTAL BASE BID: 28,378.56$ 28,378.56$ -$ 28,378.56$ TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACT: 28,378.56$ 28,378.56$ 28,378.56$ CONTRACT SUMMARY ORIGINAL CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT 28,378.56$ 28,378.56$ -$ 28,378.56$ -$ -$ -$ 28,378.56$ -$ 28,378.56$ BASE BID: Less Previous Payments LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS SUBTOTAL CURRENT RETAINAGE (0%) TOTAL CURRENT PAY REQUEST COMPLETED TO DATE COMPLETE TO DATE PAY REQUEST #1 January 2025 PAY REQUEST #1 Pay Request Horshoe Bend Project Number: 227704908 1/17/2025 City of Corcoran SECTION 00 62 76 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT FORM OWNER: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: 1 Original Contract Amount: Contract Changes approved to Date (List Change Order Numbers): Revised Contract Price : Work Completed to Date (attached): Retainage to Date, 0%: Work Completed to Date Less Retainage to Date: Total Amount Previously Certified: Payment Request This Estimate: CONTRACTOR Application for Payment Form Project No. 227704908 00 62 76-1 PAY ESTIMATE NO. I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid. 28,378.56$ N/A 28,378.56$ 28,378.56$ -$ 28,378.56$ City of Corcoran Blackstone Contractors LLC -$ 28,378.56$ Horseshoe Bend Blackstone Contractors, LLC. (contractor) By Title Approval: (CONTRACTOR)Date Date Application for Payment Form Project No. 227704908 00 62 76-2 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. END OF SECTION CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR I hereby certify that the work and the materials supplied to date, as shown on the request for payment, represents the actual value of accomplishment under the terms of the contract betweeen the City of Corcoran (OWNER) and Blackstone Contractors LLC (CONTRACTOR) and all authorized changes therto: Blackstone Contractors, LLC. Bruce Karvonen Vice President 01/28/2025 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Steve Hegland, PE Nick Wyers, PE Project/File: 227704426 Date: January 27, 2025 Subject: Pay Request to Blackstone Contractors LLC for culvert replacement at 10200 CR116 Council Action Requested Staff is recommending the City Council approve the following pay application for a culvert replacement at 10200 County Road 116 to Blackstone Contractors LLC in the amount of $9,573.90 Summary The condition of the driveway culvert for the property to the north of the new water treatment plant (10200 County Road 116) was in an unsuitable condition to continue to drain the runoff from the new water treatment facility. The contractor Blackstone Contractors LLC replaced this culvert with dual 15” RCP culverts to ensure that proper drainage is maintained, and additional gravel was brought in to increase cover over the pipe and restore the driveway to its pre-culvert replacement condition. The contactor was able to complete the work before complete frozen conditions in December. The signed payment request form and pay application is attached for review. Because this replacement was to responsibly manage the runoff from the new water treatment facility, funds from the 2023a Bond are anticipated to be used for this work. Below is a summary of the work completed to date: Total Contract Value to Date $9,573.90 Work Completed to Date $9,573.90 0% Retainage $0.00 Amount Paid to Date $0.00 Total Pay Application $9,573.90 Engineer’s Recommendation We recommend approving this Pay Request to Blackstone Contractors LLC in the amount of $9,573.90 Agenda Item 6j. LINE NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST 1 Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 426.00$ 426.00$ 1 426.00$ 0.0 -$ 1.00 426.00$ 2 Clear & Grub Trees EACH 2 710.00$ 1,420.00$ 2 1,420.00$ 0.0 -$ 2.00 1,420.00$ 3 Remove existing culvert LIN FT 24 11.83$ 283.92$ 24 283.92$ 0.0 -$ 24.00 283.92$ 4 Aggregate Base Class 5 TON 45 22.80$ 1,026.00$ 45 1,026.00$ 0.0 -$ 45.00 1,026.00$ 5 Common excavation CU YD 18 23.67$ 426.06$ 18 426.06$ 0.0 -$ 18.00 426.06$ 6 15" RCP LIN FT 36 159.72$ 5,749.92$ 36 5,749.92$ 0.0 -$ 36.00 5,749.92$ 7 Restoration EACH 1 242.00$ 242.00$ 1 242.00$ 0.0 -$ 1.00 242.00$ TOTAL BASE BID: 9,573.90$ 9,573.90$ -$ 9,573.90$ TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACT: 9,573.90$ 9,573.90$ 9,573.90$ CONTRACT SUMMARY ORIGINAL CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT 9,573.90$ 9,573.90$ -$ 9,573.90$ -$ -$ -$ 9,573.90$ -$ 9,573.90$ Pay Request 10200 CR116 Culvert Replacement Project Number: (227704426) 1/17/2025 City of Corcoran SUBTOTAL CURRENT RETAINAGE (0%) TOTAL CURRENT PAY REQUEST COMPLETED TO DATE COMPLETE TO DATE PAY REQUEST #1 January 2025 PAY REQUEST #1 BASE BID: Less Previous Payments LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS SECTION 00 62 76 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT FORM OWNER: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: 1 Original Contract Amount: Contract Changes approved to Date (List Change Order Numbers): Revised Contract Price : Work Completed to Date (attached): Retainage to Date, 0%: Work Completed to Date Less Retainage to Date: Total Amount Previously Certified: Payment Request This Estimate: CONTRACTOR Application for Payment Form Project No. 227704426 00 62 76-1 City of Corcoran Blackstone Contractors LLC -$ 9,573.90$ 10200 County Road 116 Culvert Replacement PAY ESTIMATE NO. I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid. 9,573.90$ N/A 9,573.90$ 9,573.90$ -$ 9,573.90$ Blackstone Contractors, LLC. (contractor) By Title Approval: (CONTRACTOR)Date Date Application for Payment Form Project No. 227704426 00 62 76-2 CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR I hereby certify that the work and the materials supplied to date, as shown on the request for payment, represents the actual value of accomplishment under the terms of the contract betweeen the City of Corcoran (OWNER) and Blackstone Contractors LLC (CONTRACTOR) and all authorized changes therto: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. END OF SECTION Blackstone Contractors, LLC. Bruce Karvonen Vice President 01/28/2025 February 6, 2025 Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55340 Dear Kevin: Reference: Chlorine Storage PSM Program Stantec has appreciated working with the City of Corcoran in the creation of the NE water system and has prepared the following proposal for Process Safety Management (PSM) plan development for the City of Corcoran water treatment facility. The facility is in the installation phase of the water treatment chlorination system using 2,000 pound cylinders of chlorine gas and is subject to a PSM threshold quantity of 1,500 pounds per 29 CFR 1910.119.(a)(1)(i). Corcoran intends to utilize a single 2,000-pound cylinder onsite and will supplement treatment with two 150-pound cylinders while the larger container is swapped out. This amount of chlorine will require the facility to comply with the full PSM standard. If the facility grows to a point in the future that two 2,000-pound cylinders are utilized onsite, the city will need to also comply with the RMP standard at that time (40 CFR 68.130 defines a 2,500 pound threshold quantity). The PSM standard (29 CFR 1910.119) is an OSHA regulation intended to help ensure facilities are safe; the RMP regulation (40 CFR 68) is an EPA standard nearly identical to PSM. The PSM/RMP standards require employers to identify, evaluate, and control hazards associated with highly hazardous chemicals. The PSM/RMP standards require employers to implement safety programs that include technologies, procedures, and management practices. The PSM/RMP standards protect employees from the hazards associated with uncontrolled releases of highly hazardous chemicals. The PSM standard consists of 14 interrelated elements and is a program with no defined endpoint. The RMP standard has the same 14 elements as PSM and includes release scenario analysis and reporting to EPA. Scope of Work Stantec will assist with creation of an integrated PSM program for the Corcoran facility containing all elements of the PSM. Current, applicable Corcoran programs will be incorporated by reference to the PSM program as applicable (ie…. emergency action plan). Input from Corcoran staff will be required to finalize the documentation for site specific items (location of documentation, maintenance & operating procedures, etc). Stantec will provide all final documentation to the Corcoran facility electronically in native, modifiable format (MSWord, Excel). Deliverables include: ·Written PSM program policy covering all 14 elements ·Forms for use with the PSM program (SOP review and certification, employee participation, management of change, pre-start up safety review, etc.) Agenda Item 6k. Stantec will also assist the City of Corcoran with Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) facilitation. The PSM program requires the facility complete a PHA and address any resulting action items before charging the new system with chlorine. The PHA will be a scenario discussion around what-if type selection of questions. Each question will be evaluated for potential hazards and mitigating safeguards and then assigned an overall risk rating. If a certain scenario is ranked as a high hazard, the PHA team will assign an action item with the intent to reduce the hazard to an appropriate level. The PHA team should consist of the City Operations and Maintenance personnel, along with the Stantec system designers and the facilitator. A PHA report will be provided back to you within two weeks of concluding the onsite review and meeting with City Staff and will include tracking sheets listing all action items. Cost Item Cost - Estimate PSM program $9,500 PHA facilitation $6,800 Total for all services $16,300 The costs for this work would be eligible for 2023a Bond reimbursement. We hope this letter defines the of scope work and the estimated fee of services to your satisfaction. Stantec will complete this scope of work on a hourly basis as is done with previous practices with the City of Corcoran and in accordance with the Master Services Agreement. On behalf of our Stantec team, we thank you for this opportunity to be of service to your community. Clarifications · Creation of a conforming PSM program does not constitute a design or code review of the system and provides no guarantee of process performance or safety. · Implementation and enforcement of PSM program policy, as developed through this proposal, is the sole responsibility of Corcoran. Stantec is ready to start and will commit the necessary resources to the project team to assure technical excellence and customer service. Thank you for this opportunity to work with the City of Corcoran. Should you have any questions or need clarification of anything presented in this proposal, please do not hesitate to give us a call. Regards, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. ______________________________________________________ Steven Hegland P.E. (MN) Associate Phone: 763-479-4237 steven.hegland@stantec.com By signing this proposal or issuing a Purchase Order, the City of Corcoran authorizes Stantec to proceed with the services herein described This proposal is accepted and agreed on the____________________. Per: City of Corcoran Kevin Mattson, Public Works Director Signature STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6l Council Meeting February 13, 2025 Prepared By Kevin Mattson Topic Approve Payment of Xcel Energy Invoice for NE Water Tower Action Required Approval Summary In conjunction with item 6e.Corcoran Water Tower- Change Order 3, staff requests that council approve the payment of $33,396.29 to Xcel Energy. The water tower contractor is working on establishing the electrical service for the water tower, which will be used to operate the lighting, tower mixers and water tower security and control system (installed as part of the water treatment project). Xcel Energy will not mobilize electrical service to the site until payment is made in full. Financial/Budget This item is 2023A Bond eligible. Council Action Approve payment to Xcel Energy Attachments 1.Invoice from Xcel Energy RETURN BOTTOM PORTION WITH PAYMENT ONLY •PLEASE DO NOT INCLUDE OTHER REQUESTS •SEE BACK OF BILL FOR CONTACT METHODS MAILING ADDRESS ACCOUNT NUMBER DUE DATE CITY OF CORCORAN MNNCUF 8200 COUNTY ROAD 116 CORCORAN MN 55340-2100 51-0014472455-5 Pay Now STATEMENT NUMBER STATEMENT DATE AMOUNT DUE 910850598 01/14/2025 $37,964.29 Your Account is Overdue -Please Pay Immediately ACCOUNT NUMBER DUE DATE AMOUNT DUE AMOUNT ENCLOSED 51-0014472455-5 Pay Now $37,964.29 CITY OF CORCORAN MNNCUF 8200 COUNTY ROAD 116 CORCORAN MN 55340-2100 XCEL ENERGY P.O. BOX 4176 CAROL STREAM IL 60197-4176 Page 1 of 4 32 51021325 00144724555 0000333962900003796429 QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR BILL? See our website:xcelenergy.com Please Call:1-800-481-4700 Fax:1-800-311-0050 Or write us at:XCEL ENERGY PO BOX 8 EAU CLAIRE WI 54702-0008 SUMMARY OF CURRENT CHARGES (detailed charges begin on page 2) Non-Recurring Charges /Credits $33,396.29 Current Charges $33,396.29 ACCOUNT BALANCE (Balance de su cuenta) Previous Balance $9,091.35 Payment Received Check 12/26 -$4,523.35 CR Balance Forward $4,568.00 Current Charges $33,396.29 Amount Due (Cantidad a pagar)$37,964.29 INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR BILL Just a reminder about the past due amount on your account. If you have already sent your payment, thank you. Otherwise, please call 1-800-481-4700 to confirm the status of your account. Thank you for your payment. DTTAFADDTTFTDTFTFDTDDADADAFADFATDDFTAAAFDTTADFAAATDFDTDFADDDTDFFT . 02 8 3 4 7 1 / 2 AL G P B P H M H L G P F J B K A P F I E I D N G L E P A P G K AG G M O C O O I O O G G C O K A C C M M O K C A M A M I A O K ------ manifest line --------- DTTAFADDTTFTDTFTFDTDDADADAFADFATDDFTAAAFDTTADFAAATDFDTDFADDDTDFFT 11 MAILING ADDRESS ACCOUNT NUMBER DUE DATE CITY OF CORCORAN MNNCUF 8200 COUNTY ROAD 116 CORCORAN MN 55340-2100 51-0014472455-5 Pay Now STATEMENT NUMBER STATEMENT DATE AMOUNT DUE 910850598 01/14/2025 $37,964.29 Page 2 of 4 NON-RECURRING CHARGES /CREDITS DETAILS DESCRIPTION CHARGE Invoice Number 1155376745 01/14/25 to 01/14/25 15034122 20000 OSWALD FARM RD UNIT WATER TOWER CORCORAN MN Special Fac Charge $23,483.29 Winter Elec Thaw Chg $9,913.00 Total $33,396.29 ADVANCE PAYMENT IS REQUIRED PLEASE PAY UPON RECEIPT CONTRACT 2795367 20000 OSWALD FARM RD UNIT WATER TOWER CORCORAN M SN 15034122 PAYMENT AND SIGNED CONTRACT RECEIVED BEFORE ANY WORK IS SCHEDULED.XCEL ENERGY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY RESTORATION.PRICE ON INVOICE VALID FOR 90 DAYS OF STATEMENT DATE. PLEASE WESLEY HARTLEY AT 763-221-5833 WITH QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS INVOICE ALGPBPHMHIBMGKAPHMOGNOOBFCPKAELCCHJGPADMJKDDLLDDLLLLDLLL . 51 - 0 0 1 4 4 7 2 4 5 5 - 5 01 / 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 . 02 8 3 4 7 2 / 2 AL G P B P H M H L G P F J B K A P F I E I D N G L E P A P G K AG G M O C O O I O O G G C O K A C C M M O K C A M A M I A O K STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6m. Council Meeting: February 13, 2025 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson Topic: Bass Lake Crossing 1st & 2nd Additions – Acceptance of Public Improvements Action Required: Decision Summary: The developer has completed all outstanding items related to the Bass Lake Crossing 1st & 2nd Additions except for the final reconciliation of their escrow account. Staff recommends that Council approve a conditional acceptance of the public improvements for each addition. Financial/Budget: Upon receipt of the escrow balance, the development will advance to the warranty period of the contract process. Options: 1. Approve a conditional acceptance of public improvements for Bass Lake Crossing 1st & 2nd Additions. 2. Provide staff alternative direction. 3. Decline. Recommendation: Approve a conditional acceptance of public improvements for Bass Lake Crossing 1 st & 2nd Additions. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve a conditional acceptance of public improvements for Bass Lake Crossing 1st & 2nd Additions. Attachments: 1. Certificate of Acceptance – Public Improvements STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6n. Council Meeting: February 13, 2025 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson Topic: 2025 CIP Pre-Authorization Purchases Action Required: Decision Summary: Staff is requesting pre-authorization to place pre-orders and amendments to the 2025 CIP on the following equipment. • Tandem Axle Dump Truck - $370,000 with a $45,000 resale value • Road Widener Shoulder Machine - $80,000 with a $10,000 resale value • Pickup - $70,000 with a $15,000 resale value • Pull Behind Mower - $45,000 (new equipment to the fleet) These additional items were originally included in the draft 2026 CIP shared with Council on December 12, 2024 (see attached). There is urgency with ordering and financing these items now with the uncertain economic conditions, extended lead times, and the unknown prospect of any bonding opportunities in 2026. The final 2025 Capital Improvement Plan bond issuance is tentatively scheduled for the March 13, 2025. Financial/Budget: The current draft of the 2025-2028 CIP shows a net expense of $6,090,520.00. These equipment items increase the bond issuance by $495,000. Payments for pre-order items will not take place until the items are received in 2025. Options: 1. Authorize 2025 Capital Improvement Plan pre-authorization orders and amendments as presented. 2. Send back to staff for further review. 3. Decline. Recommendation: Authorize 2025 Capital Improvement Plan pre-authorization orders and amendments as presented. Page 2 Council Action: Consider a motion to authorize 2025 Capital Improvement Plan pre-authorization orders and amendments as presented. Attachments: 1. Draft 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Plan from December 12, 2024 Council Meeting Agenda Item: 6o. City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-13 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION HONORING STEVE WARREN UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Steve Warren will retire from the Police Department, effective February 18, 2025, from the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, after serving as a Police Officer for 28 years; and WHEREAS, Officer Warren began his career in the Police Department for the City of Corcoran on January 6, 1997 and went on to complete the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension’s Supervision and Management Certificate in 2015; and WHEREAS, During his tenure in Corcoran, Steve Warren has served as a use of force instructor, firearms instructor, youth firearms instructor, snowmobile safety instructor, and field training officer. He intentionally built community connections by investing his time and energies as the Department’s Shop with a Cop coordinator and Police Reserve coordinator; and WHEREAS, during his 28 years of faithful and dedicated service to the City of Corcoran, Steve Warren has been a committed public servant having conducted himself in a highly professional manner, contributing to the betterment of the Police Department and the community as a whole. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Corcoran City Council hereby commends and thanks Steve Warren for his many years of dedicated Police service, especially for his positive contributions to the Corcoran Polce Department and he is wished a healthy and enjoyable retirement. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Friedrich, Michelle Friedrich, Michelle Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 13th day of February, 2025. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ City Seal Debra Johnson – City Clerk Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7a. City Council Meeting: February 13, 2025 Prepared By: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Topic: Public Hearing. Easement Vacation for wetland bank (City File No. 24-039) Action Required: Decision Review Deadline: March 5, 2025 (120-day extension) 1. Application Request Emily Becker, on behalf of M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St, Paul, LLC (the applicant), is requesting the vacation of drainage and utility easements over a portion of Outlot E, Rush Creek Reserve Second Addition. The vacation of the easement will allow the land to be placed in a conservation easement, which will then be used for Wetland Banking purposes. The vacation is required to create as wetland bank, which will provide new easements over these areas in favor of the State of Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR). At the request of the applicant, this item was continued from the January 9th meeting to the February 13th Council meeting. 2. Analysis As part of the Rush Creek Reserve subdivision, blanket drainage and utility easements and perimeter easements were provided over the outlots. The applicant has been working with the City as the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) local government unit (LGU) and the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) to establish a wetland bank on this property. One of the conditions of approval is that the applicant provide an unencumbered easement over the wetland areas in favor of the State of Minnesota (BWSR). The applicant is proposing to vacate only the portion of the Outlot E easement that will be covered by the BWSR easement and the remainder would remain to benefit the City. A new easement in favor of the State will be provided. The City Engineer has reviewed the request and recommends approval with conditions, including the requirement that the developer provides an escrow for wetland bank monitoring for five years as required for wetland banks. The Rush Creek Reserve Planned Unit Development (PUD) required that Outlot E be maintained by the homeowners association (HOA). MI Homes still owns Outlot E, but the change from an outlot with a wetland to an outlot with a wetland bank brings additional maintenance responsibilities. The draft approvals require the applicant to provide proof that the Page 2 of 2 Long Term Management Document has been recorded and incorporated into the HOA documents. A draft document have been submitted and the City Attorney has reviewed and recommends execution. 3. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2025-06 approving the easement vacation for Rush Creek Reserve Second Addition. Attachments 1. Resolution 2025-06 approving the easement vacation for Rush Creek Reserve Second Addition. 2. City Engineer’s Memo dated January 2, 2025 3. Applicant’s Narrative received November 5, 2024 4. Draft Stormwater Maintenance Agreement 5. Draft Perpetual Conservation Easement for Wetland Bank 6. Draft HOA document amendment 7. Location Aerial Map 8. Rush Creek Reserve Second Addition Final Plat 9. Easement vacation exhibit – Outlot E City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-06 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR A PORTION OF OUTLOT E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION (CITY FILE 24-039) WHEREAS, M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval of an easement vacation within the subdivision legally described as Outlot E, Rush Creek Reserve Second Addition WHEREAS, the applicant has been working to establish a wetland bank on the property; and WHEREAS, the approving agencies require a perpetual conservation easement over the wetland bank in favor of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the easement must be unencumbered by existing drainage and utility easements; WHEREAS, the applicant has requested vacation of the existing easements legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Corcoran City Council considered this item at a Public Hearing; WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed to all landowners of property directly abutting the area to be vacated and to all utility companies serving the area; WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper; WHEREAS, the City finds that the existing drainage and utility easements are no longer required as new easements will be dedicated with this resolution; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the following vacation, subject to the following conditions: 1. The easement vacation is approved in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on November 5, 2024, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The applicant must comply with the conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated January 2, 2025. 3. The applicant must dedicate new stormwater maintenance access agreement over the proposed wetland areas to the City. City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-06 Page 2 of 4 4. Prior to release of the vacation resolution for recording, the applicant must provide a copy of the new easement for City review and approval. 5. Prior to release of the documents for filing, the applicant must provide proof that the Long Term Management Document has incorporated into the HOA documents. These documents must be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney and recorded against the property if directed by the City. 6. The applicant must provide a $30,000.00 escrow to the City for wetland bank monitoring. 7. The applicant must record the resolution approving the vacation at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 8. The applicant must record the stormwater maintenance access agreement at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Friedrich, Michelle Friedrich, Michelle Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 13th day of February 2025. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Debra Johnson – City Clerk City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-06 Page 3 of 4 Attachment A – Legal Description That part of the drainage and utility easement dedicated over, under, and across Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Outlot E; thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, assumed bearing along the east line of said Outlot E, a distance of 42.53 feet; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds West, 41.89 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 01 degree 40 minutes 58 seconds West, 30.32 feet; thence South 07 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds West, 71.19 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 40 seconds East, 171.48 feet; thence North 60 degrees 43 minutes 49 seconds West, 82.32 feet; thence South 50 degrees 49 minutes 45 seconds West, 86.46 feet; thence South 06 degrees 45 minutes 17 seconds West, 38.27 feet; thence South 11 degrees 44 minutes 13 seconds West, 64.77 feet; thence South 25 degrees 58 minutes 41 seconds East, 54.68 feet to the boundary of said Outlot E; thence South 78 degrees 56 minutes 25 seconds West, 65.00 feet; thence South 58 degrees 26 minutes 15 seconds West, 38.40 feet; thence South 55 degrees 06 minutes 33 seconds West, 33.02 feet; thence South 37 degrees 41 minutes 05 seconds West, 55.00 feet; thence South 20 degrees 15 minutes 37 seconds West, 33.02 feet; thence South 16 degrees 55 minutes 55 seconds West, 38.40 feet; thence South 03 degrees 34 minutes 14 seconds East, 60.95 feet; thence South 22 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds East, 171.79 feet; thence South 04 degrees 15 minutes 39 seconds East, 65.05 feet; thence South 10 degrees 34 minutes 02 seconds East, 76.86 feet; thence South 16 degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds East, 65.03 feet; thence South 22 degrees 39 minutes 07 seconds East, 65.03 feet; thence South 28 degrees 25 minutes 44 seconds East, 67.36 feet; thence South 20 degrees 57 minutes 13 seconds East, 51.13 feet; thence South 03 degrees 54 minutes 12 seconds East, 56.20 feet; thence South 13 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds West, 55.99 feet; thence South 27 degrees 58 minutes 49 seconds West, 50.56 feet; thence South 40 degrees 54 minutes 44 seconds West, 51.26 feet; thence South 54 degrees 04 minutes 48 seconds West, 52.41 feet; thence South 67 degrees 23 minutes 26 seconds West, 52.38 feet; thence South 81 degrees 28 minutes 26 seconds West, 58.68 feet; thence North 89 degrees 21 minutes 56 seconds West, 54.94 feet; thence North 77 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds West, 53.12 feet; thence North 57 degrees 51 minutes 32 seconds West, 51.04 feet; thence North 42 degrees 41 minutes 01 second West, 52.73 feet; thence North 41 degrees 27 minutes 14 seconds West, 295.00 feet; thence South 48 degrees 32 minutes 46 seconds West, 113.53 feet; thence northwesterly 71.18 feet along a non- tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 335.00 feet, a central angle of 12 degrees 10 minutes 26 seconds, a chord bearing of North 55 degrees 52 minutes 07 seconds West and having a chord length of 71.05 feet; thence North 61 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 29.78 feet; thence South 85 degrees 04 minutes 41 seconds East, 37.00 feet; thence North 84 degrees 36 minutes 25 seconds East, 41.94 feet; thence North 67 degrees 19 minutes 09 seconds East, 33.43 feet; thence North 49 degrees 10 minutes 23 seconds East, 50.63 feet; thence North 15 degrees 55 minutes 18 seconds East, 49.46 feet; thence North 07 degrees 58 minutes 09 seconds East, 75.18 feet; thence North 06 degrees 07 minutes 15 seconds East, 70.83 feet; thence North 21 degrees 01 minute 07 seconds East, 46.28 feet; thence North 50 degrees 48 minutes 49 seconds East, 46.28 feet; thence North 66 degrees 41 minutes 09 seconds East, 52.95 feet; thence North 56 degrees 48 minutes 28 seconds East, 41.09 feet; thence North 38 degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 22 degrees 32 minutes 57 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 06 degrees 52 minutes 27 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 08 degrees 48 minutes 03 City of Corcoran February 13, 2025 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2025-06 Page 4 of 4 seconds West, 30.00 feet; thence North 24 degrees 28 minutes 33 seconds West, 30.00 feet; thence North 40 degrees 18 minutes 54 seconds West, 30.63 feet; thence North 55 degrees 23 minutes 02 seconds West, 85.76 feet; thence North 37 degrees 07 minutes 11 seconds West, 58.40 feet; thence North 03 degrees 00 minutes 13 seconds West, 47.14 feet; thence North 29 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East, 53.42 feet; thence North 43 degrees 33 minutes 08 seconds East, 122.05 feet; thence North 37 degrees 25 minutes 14 seconds East, 115.39 feet; thence North 31 degrees 05 minutes 47 seconds East, 131.48 feet; thence North 47 degrees 56 minutes 19 seconds East, 59.96 feet; thence North 67 degrees 23 minutes 41 seconds East, 54.94; thence North 53 degrees 45 minutes 32 seconds East, 51.86 feet; thence North 29 degrees 59 minutes 12 seconds East, 38.72 feet; thence North 09 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds East, 38.72 feet; thence North 00 degrees 32 minutes 57 seconds West, 38.03 feet; thence South 89 degrees 36 minutes 01 second East, 71.58 feet; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds West, 33.94 feet; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds East, 222.17 feet to the point of beginning. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, Public Works Director City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Rush Creek Reserve Easement Vacation Date: January 2, 2025 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents: 1. Rush Creek Reserve Easement Vacation Request by M/I Homes 2. Easement Vacation Exhibit by Stantec Dated November 4, 2024 General: 1. We are supportive of the easement vacation if the following conditions can be met. o The city should obtain a stormwater maintenance access agreement over the easement vacation area which would allow the city to enter and perform any stormwater maintenance items should they need to. As offsite stormwater flows through the wetland bank, this would allow the City to enter the area and remedy any issues that are affecting offsite parcels should the responsible party not do so in a timely manner. o As the HOA is responsible for the long-term maintenance of the wetland bank, we would recommend the maintenance responsibly and associated documents be formally incorporated into the HOA documents for the Rush Creek Reserve development. End of Comments Hennepin County Property Map Date: 1/2/2025 Comments:PARCEL ID: 2311923410033 OWNER NAME: M/I Homes/Mpls/St Paul Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 20031 80th Ave,Corcoran MN 55340 PARCEL AREA: 17.83 acres, 776,583 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: SALE DATE: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2023, PAYABLE 2024 PROPERTY TYPE: Vacant Land-Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $1,000 TAX TOTAL: $15.84 ASSESSED 2024, PAYABLE 2025 PROPERTY TYPE: Vacant Land-Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $1,200 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2025 1:4,800 RUSH CREEK RESERVE EASEMENT VACATION REQUEST Rush Creek Reserve Easement Vacation Request Page 1 INTRODUCTION M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC (M/I Homes) is requesting an easement vacation to vacate a portion of the drainage and utility easement that was dedicated over all of Outlot E of Rush Creek Reserve 2nd Addition. The subject outlot will contain a wetland bank that will restore and enhance an existing wetland to compensate for unavoidable impacts to wetlands elsewhere, allowing others the opportunity to purchase credits for impacted wetlands due to developments outside of Rush Creek Reserve. ADHERENCE TO APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT A condition of the wetland bank approval was that a conservation easement be recorded over the wetland bank area. To record the conservation easement, it is required that the underlying drainage and utility easement over the entirety of Outlot E be vacated in that portion that the conservation easement is required. A sample conservation easement is attached. This will be required over that portion of Outlot E where the wetland bank is planned and where the drainage and utility easement is being vacated. In summary, the easement sets forth the expectation that the grantor (M/I Homes) will construct and maintain the wetland bank easement area at its sole cost; allow necessary inspections and repairs inside the easement area; grant the City and State perpetual right to access the easement area; and will not alter or use the easement area in any way other than the improvements outlined in the approved plans. STORMWATER MAINTENANCE ACCESS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the _____ day of ____________, 20__, by and between the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), and M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC (the “Developer”). The City and the Developer are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “parties” or each a “party”. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer owns certain real property located in the Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Developer has granted to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), a conservation easement over the portions of the Property as described and shown in Exhibit B, (collectively the “Easement Areas”); and WHEREAS, the Developer intends to construct a wetland bank within a portion of the Easement Areas for the benefit of the Property; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer intend to comply with certain conditions, including entering into a maintenance access agreement regarding the drainage areas within the Easement Area; 2 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer, and its successors and assigns, as fee owner of the Property shall be responsible for maintaining the Stormwater Improvements and for observing all drainage laws governing the operation and maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer shall provide the City with a schedule acceptable to the City for the periodic inspection of the Stormwater Improvements by the Developer. The Developer shall make all such scheduled inspections, keep records of all inspections and maintenance activities, and submit such records annually to the City. The cost of all inspections and maintenance, including, but not limited to, skimming and cleaning of the Stormwater Improvements, shall be the obligation of the Developer and its successors or assigns as the fee owner of the Property. 2. City’s Maintenance Rights. The City may maintain the Stormwater Improvements, as provided in this paragraph, if the City reasonably believes that the Developer or its successors or assigns has failed to maintain the Stormwater Improvements in accordance with applicable drainage laws or performance guidelines as listed in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s document Minnesota Stormwater Manual, and such failure continues for 30 days after the City gives the Developer written notice of such failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that Developer is making a good faith and diligent effort to complete said task. The City’s notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. If Developer does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Areas to perform such maintenance tasks. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Developer or its successors or assigns, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer, or its successors or assigns, fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses in maintaining the Stormwater Improvements within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Property. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding the Stormwater Improvements benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an emergency, as determined by the City Engineer, the 30-day notice requirement to the Developer for failure to perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety by the Developer, and the Developer shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any expense so incurred by the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has been given. 3. Hold Harmless. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, representatives, officials, assigns, and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from the Developer’s, or the Developer’s agents’, contractors’, assigns’ or employees’ negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the 3 performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents, representatives, officials, assigns or employees or failure by the City, its agents, representatives, officials, assigns or employees to take any other prudent precautions. In the event the City, upon the failure of the Developer to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, representatives, officials, assigns, and employees for its own negligent acts in the performance of the Developer’s required work under this Agreement, but this indemnification shall not extend to intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its agents, representatives, officials, assigns or employees. 4. Costs of Enforcement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs prudently incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. 5. Rights Not Exclusive. No right of the City under this Agreement shall be deemed to be exclusive and the City shall retain all rights and powers it may have under Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 (as the same may be amended) to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve the Stormwater Improvements. 6. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered or be sent by U.S. certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: a) as to Developer: M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, Suite 100 St Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 ATTN: Emily Becker b) as to City: City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 ATTN: City Administrator or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 7. Successors. All duties and obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Developer’s successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property. 8. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be binding and effective as of the date first written above. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 4 DEVELOPER: By: ______________________________________ Its: ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ________________, 20____, by __________________________________ the ____________________________________ of ______________________________________ on its behalf. ______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC 5 CITY OF CORCORAN: By: Jay Tobin, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ______________, 20__, by Jay Tobin City Administrator, of the city of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: John J. Thames, Esq. CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER 6300 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Suite 305 Minneapolis, MN 55430 (763) 561-2800 A-1 EXHIBIT A (the “Property”) Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION C-1 EXHIBIT B (the “Easement Areas”) That part of the drainage and utility easement dedicated over, under, and across Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Outlot E; thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, assumed bearing along the east line of said Outlot E, a distance of 42.53 feet; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds West, 41.89 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 01 degree 40 minutes 58 seconds West, 30.32 feet; thence South 07 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds West, 71.19 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 40 seconds East, 171.48 feet; thence North 60 degrees 43 minutes 49 seconds West, 82.32 feet; thence South 50 degrees 49 minutes 45 seconds West, 86.46 feet; thence South 06 degrees 45 minutes 17 seconds West, 38.27 feet; thence South 11 degrees 44 minutes 13 seconds West, 64.77 feet; thence South 25 degrees 58 minutes 41 seconds East, 54.68 feet to the boundary of said Outlot E; thence South 78 degrees 56 minutes 25 seconds West, 65.00 feet; thence South 58 degrees 26 minutes 15 seconds West, 38.40 feet; thence South 55 degrees 06 minutes 33 seconds West, 33.02 feet; thence South 37 degrees 41 minutes 05 seconds West, 55.00 feet; thence South 20 degrees 15 minutes 37 seconds West, 33.02 feet; thence South 16 degrees 55 minutes 55 seconds West, 38.40 feet; thence South 03 degrees 34 minutes 14 seconds East, 60.95 feet; thence South 22 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds East, 171.79 feet; thence South 04 degrees 15 minutes 39 seconds East, 65.05 feet; thence South 10 degrees 34 minutes 02 seconds East, 76.86 feet; thence South 16 degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds East, 65.03 feet; thence South 22 degrees 39 minutes 07 seconds East, 65.03 feet; thence South 28 degrees 25 minutes 44 seconds East, 67.36 feet; thence South 20 degrees 57 minutes 13 seconds East, 51.13 feet; thence South 03 degrees 54 minutes 12 seconds East, 56.20 feet; thence South 13 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds West, 55.99 feet; thence South 27 degrees 58 minutes 49 seconds West, 50.56 feet; thence South 40 degrees 54 minutes 44 seconds West, 51.26 feet; thence South 54 degrees 04 minutes 48 seconds West, 52.41 feet; thence South 67 degrees 23 minutes 26 seconds West, 52.38 feet; thence South 81 degrees 28 minutes 26 seconds West, 58.68 feet; thence North 89 degrees 21 minutes 56 seconds West, 54.94 feet; thence North 77 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds West, 53.12 feet; thence North 57 degrees 51 minutes 32 seconds West, 51.04 feet; thence North 42 degrees 41 minutes 01 second West, 52.73 feet; thence North 41 degrees 27 minutes 14 seconds West, 295.00 feet; thence South 48 degrees 32 minutes 46 seconds West, 113.53 feet; thence northwesterly 71.18 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 335.00 feet, a central angle of 12 degrees 10 minutes 26 seconds, a chord bearing of North 55 degrees 52 minutes 07 seconds West and having a chord length of 71.05 feet; thence North 61 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 29.78 feet; thence South 85 degrees 04 minutes 41 seconds East, 37.00 feet; thence North 84 degrees 36 minutes 25 seconds East, 41.94 feet; thence North 67 degrees 19 minutes 09 seconds East, 33.43 feet; thence North 49 degrees 10 minutes 23 seconds East, 50.63 feet; thence North 15 degrees 55 minutes 18 seconds East, 49.46 feet; thence North 07 degrees 58 minutes 09 seconds East, 75.18 feet; thence North 06 degrees 07 minutes 15 seconds East, 70.83 feet; thence North 21 degrees 01 minute 07 seconds East, 46.28 feet; thence North 50 degrees 48 minutes 49 seconds East, 46.28 feet; thence North C-2 66 degrees 41 minutes 09 seconds East, 52.95 feet; thence North 56 degrees 48 minutes 28 seconds East, 41.09 feet; thence North 38 degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 22 degrees 32 minutes 57 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 06 degrees 52 minutes 27 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 08 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds West, 30.00 feet; thence North 24 degrees 28 minutes 33 seconds West, 30.00 feet; thence North 40 degrees 18 minutes 54 seconds West, 30.63 feet; thence North 55 degrees 23 minutes 02 seconds West, 85.76 feet; thence North 37 degrees 07 minutes 11 seconds West, 58.40 feet; thence North 03 degrees 00 minutes 13 seconds West, 47.14 feet; thence North 29 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East, 53.42 feet; thence North 43 degrees 33 minutes 08 seconds East, 122.05 feet; thence North 37 degrees 25 minutes 14 seconds East, 115.39 feet; thence North 31 degrees 05 minutes 47 seconds East, 131.48 feet; thence North 47 degrees 56 minutes 19 seconds East, 59.96 feet; thence North 67 degrees 23 minutes 41 seconds East, 54.94; thence North 53 degrees 45 minutes 32 seconds East, 51.86 feet; thence North 29 degrees 59 minutes 12 seconds East, 38.72 feet; thence North 09 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds East, 38.72 feet; thence North 00 degrees 32 minutes 57 seconds West, 38.03 feet; thence South 89 degrees 36 minutes 01 second East, 71.58 feet; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds West, 33.94 feet; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds East, 222.17 feet to the point of beginning. Page 1 of 8 Perpetual Wetland Bank Easement (09/24) BWSR Easement No. 27‐01‐24‐05 PERPETUAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR WETLAND BANK STATE OF MINNESOTA | BOARD OF WATER & SOIL RESOURCES Grantor(s): M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC, hereinafter “Grantor(s)”. Grantee: State of Minnesota, acting by the Board of Water and Soil Resources, hereinafter “State”. Location: Section 23, Township 119 N., Range 23 W., County of Hennepin This Perpetual Conservation Easement for Wetland Bank (“Easement”) is made this day of 20 , by and between the undersigned Grantor(s) and the State. The parties agree as follows: A.This Easement is made pursuant to and in furtherance of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, Minn. Stat. §§ 103G.221‐.2375 (“WCA”), and the rules implementing the WCA, Minn. R. ch. 8420 (“WCA Rules”), as amended, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged. B.This Easement lies over and upon land legally described and identified as “Easement Parcel(s)” in the attached Certificate of Survey, which is incorporated herein by this reference. C.Such Easement Parcel(s) are the subject of a wetland mitigation plan approved on October 14th , 2024 and as amended thereafter (“Plan”), prepared in accordance with Minn. R. 8420.0700‐.0755. The Plan includes, but is not limited to, all executed forms provided to Grantor(s) by the State, supporting maps, engineering plans and drawings, the monitoring plan, the vegetation establishment plan, the management plan, and the facilities maintenance plan, where applicable. The local government unit (“LGU”) charged under the WCA with approving the Plan is City of Corcoran. A complete copy of the Plan is on file with the LGU at the following address: One Carlson Parkway, Suite 100, Plymouth, MN 55447. D.The WCA is administered by the State. DR A F T Page 2 of 8 E. The term “Grantor(s)” includes all fee owners of the Easement Parcel(s). The Grantor(s), and successor fee owner(s), are jointly and severally responsible for complying with the terms of this Easement, and for payment of costs associated with it. F. Banking applicant(s) that are not fee owner(s) of the Easement Parcel(s) are responsible with fee owner(s) for preservation of the banked wetland’s functions. Further, they are jointly and severally responsible for success of the banking project according to the approved banking plan and for maintaining the banking project according to the conditions of this Easement. However, non‐fee owner applicant(s) are not responsible for maintenance after the monitoring requirements have been completed if they no longer own credits associated with the banked wetland. Where applicable, non‐fee owner applicant(s) have acknowledged these responsibilities in a Wetland Banking Plan Applicant (Non‐Fee Owner) Acknowledgment form attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. G. This Easement and the duties and restrictions contained herein shall run with the land. H. This Easement pertains to both wetlands and uplands within the Easement Parcel(s). I. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103G.222, subd. 1(h), once wetlands are restored or created as a result of an approved replacement plan, the Easement Parcel(s) are no longer eligible for the exemptions set forth in Minn. Stat. § 103G.224. J. All references in this Easement to Minnesota Statutes and to Minnesota Rules are to the statutes and rules currently in effect, and as amended or renumbered in the future. K. The purpose of this Easement is to maintain and improve the ecological values of the Easement Parcel(s) through the means identified in the Plan, and to preserve the Easement Parcel(s) in a natural condition in perpetuity. IN ADDITION, THE GRANTOR(S), FOR THEMSELVES, THEIR HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, COVENANT THAT THEY: 1. Shall maintain wetlands and upland buffers within the Easement Parcel(s), as specified in the Plan approved by the LGU and on file at its offices. Wetland and upland buffer areas shall generally be the size and type specified in the Plan or as approved by the LGU or any federal agency with jurisdiction over the Easement Parcel(s), based on information obtained through monitoring or site inspections after completion of the activities specified in the Plan. Grantor(s) shall not make any use of the Easement Parcel(s) that would adversely affect any of the functions or values of the area. Those functions and values are identified in Minn. R. 8420.0522, subp. 1 and the Plan. 2. Shall pay the costs of maintenance, repairs, and reconstruction of wetlands and upland buffers within the Easement Parcel(s), which the LGU or State may deem necessary to comply with the specifications for Easement Parcel(s) in the Plan. The Grantor’s obligations under this paragraph include the payment of any lawful taxes or assessments on the Easement Parcel(s). 3. Shall maintain visible monuments such as signs, numbered fence posts or survey posts at prominent locations along the boundary of the Easement Parcel(s) in accordance with the approved Plan. If DR A F T Page 3 of 8 numbered fence posts are used, the Plan must contain a survey or scaled drawing of the property corresponding to fence post numbering. Posts must be at least four (4) feet high and notably visible on the landscape. If signs are used, such signs must have a surface area of at least one quarter (¼) square feet, be mounted on a fence post at least four (4) feet above ground, and display the phrase: “Conservation Easement Boundary – Land Protected by Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Easement – Landowner Permission Required to Access.” Such posts and signs must be made of non‐degradable material. 4. Shall allow repairs and inspections necessary to maintain existing drainage systems or public utilities within the Easement Parcel(s). Repairs and inspections for existing drainage systems are subject to Minnesota Statutes chapter 103E, local rules and ordinances, and/or any applicable legal agreements. The location of the drainage system(s) and public utilities must be shown on figures or design sheets included in the Plan or provided to the LGU and State prior to the maintenance work. Grantor(s) shall be responsible for restoration of the Easement Parcel(s) to the restored condition(s) described in the Plan or to the condition(s) present immediately prior to the maintenance work as soon as site conditions allow after the maintenance activities are completed. 5. Grants to the LGU and State, and their agents and employees, a perpetual right to access the Easement Parcel(s), and an ingress and egress route over and across the Easement Parcel(s) for inspection, monitoring and enforcement purposes. Ingress and egress routes shall be over and across areas specified on the attached Certificate of Survey, or, if not specified therein, the most reasonably direct and convenient route between Easement Parcel(s) and a public road. If the Easement Parcel(s) have been used to mitigate wetland losses under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“FWPCA”), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”), and its agents, employees and successors, are also granted a perpetual right to access, and an ingress and egress route over and across the Easement Parcel(s) for inspection, monitoring and enforcement purposes. If the Easement Parcel(s) have been used to satisfy wetland conservation compliance responsibilities for agricultural producers under federal farm programs, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (“NRCS”), and its agents, employees and successors, are also granted a perpetual right to access, and an ingress and egress route over and across the Easement Parcel(s) for inspection, monitoring and enforcement purposes. This Easement does not grant the general public access or entry to the Easement Parcel(s). 6. Acknowledge that this Easement shall be unlimited in duration, without being re‐ recorded. This Easement shall be deemed to be a perpetual conservation easement pursuant to Minn. Stat. ch. 84C. 7. Acknowledge that unless expressly authorized in writing by the LGU, and by federal agencies that have approved the Plan as a means of providing wetland mitigation, Grantor(s): (a) Shall not produce agricultural crops on the Easement Parcel(s), except that this provision does not restrict the harvest of seeds of native vegetation if only the seed‐head is removed in the process of harvest and does not involve the use of vehicular, motorized equipment; (b) Shall not cut hay, mow vegetation, or cut timber on the Easement Parcel(s) except as allowed or prescribed in the Plan; (c) Shall not make any vegetative alterations on the Easement Parcel(s) that do not enhance or would degrade the ecological functions and values of Easement Parcel(s). Vegetative DR A F T Page 4 of 8 alterations shall be limited to those listed in the approved Plan; (d) Shall not graze livestock on the Easement Parcel(s); (e) Shall not place any materials, substances or other objects on the Easement Parcel(s), or erect or construct any type of structure, whether temporary or permanent, on the Easement Parcel(s); (f) Shall not allow vehicular traffic on the Easement Parcel(s) except for the purpose of implementing construction or maintenance activities specifically authorized in the Plan; (g) Shall not alter the topography of the Easement Parcel(s) by any means including plowing, dredging, filling, mining or drilling; and (h) Shall not modify the hydrology of the Easement Parcel(s) in any way or by any means, including pumping, draining, ditching, diking, impounding or diverting surface or ground water into or out of the Easement Parcel(s). 8. Acknowledge that Grantor(s) are responsible, at their cost, for weed control on the Easement Parcel(s) by complying with noxious weed control laws, and for emergency control of pests necessary to protect the public health. 9. Acknowledge that this Easement may be modified only by the joint written approval of the LGU and State. If the Easement Parcel(s) have been used to mitigate wetland losses under FWPCA, the USACE must also agree to the modification in writing and must be provided with at least 60 days’ advance notice be fore any action is taken to void or modify this Easement, including the transfer of title to, or the establishment of any other legal claims over, the Easement Parcel(s). If the Easement Parcel(s) have been used to satisfy conservation compliance responsibilities for agricultural producers under federal farm programs, the NRCS must also agree to modification of this Easement in writing. 10. Acknowledge that this Easement may be enforced, at law or in equity, by the LGU or State. The LGU and State shall be entitled to recover an award of reasonable attorney’s fees from Grantor(s) in any action to enforce this Easement. The right to enforce the terms of this Easement is not waived or forfeited by any forbearance or failure to act on the part of the LGU or State. If the Easement Parcel(s) are to be used partially or wholly to fulfill permit requirements under the FWPCA or federal farm programs, then the provisions of this Easement running to the LGU or State may also be enforced by the federal government in a court of competent jurisdiction. 11. Shall notify the State in writing of the names and addresses of new owners within 30 days after the conveyance of all or part of the title or interest in the land described herein. 12. Shall indemnify and hold harmless the State of Minnesota, its employees, agents, and assigns from any and all liabilities, claims, and any other expenses (whether legal or equitable in nature and including, without limitation, court costs, and attorneys’ fees) to which the State of Minnesota may be subject or incur relating to the Easement Parcel(s), including but not limited to those which may arise from Grantor’s negligent acts, omissions, or breach of any representation, warranty, or agreement contained in this Easement, or violations of any federal, state, or local laws. DR A F T Page 5 of 8 GRANTOR(S) SIGNATURE & ACKNOWLEDGMENT M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC Tom Jacobs, Region President STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20______by Tom Jacobs, Region President of M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC, a Limited Liability Company under the laws of Delaware, on behalf of the Limited Liability Company. (Notary Stamp or Seal) Notary Signature ____________________________ Commission expires on _______________________ DR A F T Page 6 of 8 GRANTOR(S) SIGNATURE & ACKNOWLEDGMENT M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC John Rask, Area President STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20______by John Rask, Area President of M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC, a Limited Liability Company under the laws of Delaware, on behalf of the Limited Liability Company. (Notary Stamp or Seal) Notary Signature ____________________________ Commission expires on _______________________ DR A F T Page 7 of 8 GRANTOR(S) SIGNATURE & ACKNOWLEDGMENT M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC Morgan Bickel, Vice President, Construction STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20______by Morgan Bickel, Vice President, Construction of M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC, a Limited Liability Company under the laws of Delaware, on behalf of the Limited Liability Company. (Notary Stamp or Seal) Notary Signature ____________________________ Commission expires on _______________________ DR A F T Page 8 of 8 STATE SIGNATURE & ACKNOWLEDGMENT The State accepts the foregoing Easement. By: Dated David Weirens, Board of Water & Soil Resources STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______day of ,20 by David Weirens, Assistant Director for Programs and Policy of the Board of Water and Soil Resources, State of Minnesota. (Notary Stamp or Seal) Notary Signature This instrument was drafted by: Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 DR A F T Easement Vacation Description That part of the drainage and utility easement dedicated over, under, and across Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Outlot E; thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, assumed bearing along the east line of said Outlot E, a distance of 42.53 feet; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds West, 41.89 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 01 degree 40 minutes 58 seconds West, 30.32 feet; thence South 07 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds West, 71.19 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 40 seconds East, 171.48 feet; thence North 60 degrees 43 minutes 49 seconds West, 82.32 feet; thence South 50 degrees 49 minutes 45 seconds West, 86.46 feet; thence South 06 degrees 45 minutes 17 seconds West, 38.27 feet; thence South 11 degrees 44 minutes 13 seconds West, 64.77 feet; thence South 25 degrees 58 minutes 41 seconds East, 54.68 feet to the boundary of said Outlot E; thence South 78 degrees 56 minutes 25 seconds West, 65.00 feet; thence South 58 degrees 26 minutes 15 seconds West, 38.40 feet; thence South 55 degrees 06 minutes 33 seconds West, 33.02 feet; thence South 37 degrees 41 minutes 05 seconds West, 55.00 feet; thence South 20 degrees 15 minutes 37 seconds West, 33.02 feet; thence South 16 degrees 55 minutes 55 seconds West, 38.40 feet; thence South 03 degrees 34 minutes 14 seconds East, 60.95 feet; thence South 22 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds East, 171.79 feet; thence South 04 degrees 15 minutes 39 seconds East, 65.05 feet; thence South 10 degrees 34 minutes 02 seconds East, 76.86 feet; thence South 16 degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds East, 65.03 feet; thence South 22 degrees 39 minutes 07 seconds East, 65.03 feet; thence South 28 degrees 25 minutes 44 seconds East, 67.36 feet; thence South 20 degrees 57 minutes 13 seconds East, 51.13 feet; thence South 03 degrees 54 minutes 12 seconds East, 56.20 feet; thence South 13 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds West, 55.99 feet; thence South 27 degrees 58 minutes 49 seconds West, 50.56 feet; thence South 40 degrees 54 minutes 44 seconds West, 51.26 feet; thence South 54 degrees 04 minutes 48 seconds West, 52.41 feet; thence South 67 degrees 23 minutes 26 seconds West, 52.38 feet; thence South 81 degrees 28 minutes 26 seconds West, 58.68 feet; thence North 89 degrees 21 minutes 56 seconds West, 54.94 feet; thence North 77 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds West, 53.12 feet; thence North 57 degrees 51 minutes 32 seconds West, 51.04 feet; thence North 42 degrees 41 minutes 01 second West, 52.73 feet; thence North 41 degrees 27 minutes 14 seconds West, 295.00 feet; thence South 48 degrees 32 minutes 46 seconds West, 113.53 feet; thence northwesterly 71.18 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 335.00 feet, a central angle of 12 degrees 10 minutes 26 seconds, a chord bearing of North 55 degrees 52 minutes 07 seconds West and having a chord length of 71.05 feet; thence North 61 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 29.78 feet; thence South 85 degrees 04 minutes 41 seconds East, 37.00 feet; thence North 84 degrees 36 minutes 25 seconds East, 41.94 feet; thence North 67 degrees 19 minutes 09 seconds East, 33.43 feet; thence North 49 degrees 10 minutes 23 seconds East, 50.63 feet; thence North 15 degrees 55 minutes 18 seconds East, 49.46 feet; thence North 07 degrees 58 minutes 09 seconds East, 75.18 feet; thence North 06 degrees 07 minutes 15 seconds East, 70.83 feet; thence North 21 degrees 01 minute 07 seconds East, 46.28 feet; thence North 50 degrees 48 minutes 49 seconds East, 46.28 feet; thence North 66 degrees 41 minutes 09 seconds East, 52.95 feet; thence North 56 degrees 48 minutes 28 seconds East, 41.09 feet; thence North 38 degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 22 degrees 32 minutes 57 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 06 degrees 52 minutes 27 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 08 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds West, 30.00 feet; thence North 24 degrees 28 minutes 33 seconds West, 30.00 feet; thence North 40 degrees 18 minutes 54 seconds West, 30.63 feet; thence North 55 degrees 23 minutes 02 seconds West, 85.76 feet; thence North 37 degrees 07 minutes 11 seconds West, 58.40 feet; thence North 03 degrees 00 minutes 13 seconds West, 47.14 feet; thence North 29 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East, 53.42 feet; thence North 43 degrees 33 minutes 08 seconds East, 122.05 feet; thence North 37 degrees 25 minutes 14 seconds East, 115.39 feet; thence North 31 degrees 05 minutes 47 seconds East, 131.48 feet; thence North 47 degrees 56 minutes 19 seconds East, 59.96 feet; thence North 67 degrees 23 minutes 41 seconds East, 54.94; thence North 53 degrees 45 minutes 32 seconds East, 51.86 feet; thence North 29 degrees 59 minutes 12 seconds East, 38.72 feet; thence North 09 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds East, 38.72 feet; thence North 00 degrees 32 minutes 57 seconds West, 38.03 feet; thence South 89 degrees 36 minutes 01 second East, 71.58 feet; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds West, 33.94 feet; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds East, 222.17 feet to the point of beginning. PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE LIC. NO. PROJ. NO. SURVEY EASEMENT VACATION DANIEL J. ROEBER NOVEMBER 4, 2024 43133 193806728_V602.dwg 193806728 SHEET 1 OF 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. WALNUT LANE 80T H AVEN UE OUTLOT E 80TH AVENUE S89°54'25"E 222.17 Northeast corner of Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION 42.53S00°05'35"W East line of Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION 171.48 S00°00'40"E 7 1 .1 9 S 0 7 °4 1 '0 0 "W 3 0 .3 2 S 0 1 °4 0 '5 8 "W 82.32 N60°43'49"W S 5 0 °4 9'4 5 "W 8 6.4 6 38.27 S06°45'17"W 64.77S11°44'13"W 5 4 .6 8 S 2 5 °5 8 '4 1 "E OUTLOT B 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 3 2 1 OUTLOT A 65.00 S7 8°5 6'2 5" W 38.4 0 S 58°26'15" W 33.0 2 S5 5°0 6'3 3" W55.00 S37°41'05"W 33.02 S20°15'37"W 38.40 S16°55'55"W 60.95S03°34'14"E 1 7 1 . 7 9 S 2 2 ° 0 8 ' 5 3 " E 4 2 . 2 2 7 4 . 2 1 5 5 . 3 6 65.05 S04 °1 5'39"E 7 6 .8 6 S 1 0 °3 4 '0 2 "E 6 5 .0 3 S 1 6 °5 2 '2 2 "E 6 5 .0 3 S 2 2 °3 9 '0 7 "E 6 7 .3 6 S 2 8 °2 5 '4 4 "E 5 1 .1 3 S 2 0 °5 7 '1 3 "E 5 6 .2 0 S 0 3 °5 4 '1 2 "E 55.99S13°54'25"W 50.56S27°58'49"W5 1.2 6 S 40 °5 4'4 4" W 5 2 . 4 1 S 5 4 ° 0 4'4 8 " W 5 2 . 3 8 S 6 7 ° 2 3 ' 2 6 " W 5 8 . 6 8 S 8 1 °2 8' 2 6 "W 54.94 N89°21'56"W53.12 N77°12'08"W51.04 N57°51'32"W 52.73 N 42°41'01"W N 4 1 °2 7'1 4" W 2 9 5.0 0 5 5.0 0 6 5.0 0 5 5.00 6 5.00 5 5.0 0 1 1 3.5 3 S 4 8 °3 2'46"W 71.18R=335.00 Δ=12°10'26" CB=N55°52'07"W 3 3.4 3 N 6 7 ° 1 9'0 9 " E 49.46N15°55'18"E 75.18 N07°58'09"E 70.83N06°07'15"E 46.28 N21°01'07"E 46.28 N50°48'49"E 52.95N66°41'09"E 41.09 N56°48'28"E 30.00N38°13'27"E 30.00N22°32'57"E 30.00N06°52'27"E 30.00N08°48'03"W 3 0 .0 0 N 2 4 °2 8 '3 3 "W 3 0 .6 3 N 4 0 °1 8'5 4 "W 85.76 N55°23'02"W 5 8.4 0 N 3 7 ° 0 7'1 1 " W 4 7 .1 4 N 0 3 °0 0 '1 3 "W 53.42N29°26'30"E 1 22.05 N 4 3°3 3'0 8"E 115.39 N37°25'14"E 131.48 N31°05'47"E 5 9 . 9 6 N 4 7 ° 5 6 ' 1 9 " E 5 4 . 9 4 N 6 7 ° 2 3 ' 4 1 " E 5 1 . 8 6 N 5 3 ° 4 5 ' 3 2 " E 3 8.7 2 N 2 9 °5 9'1 2 "E 71.58 S89°36'01"E 38.72N09°42'47"E 38.03N00°32'57"W 33 .94 S 00 °0 7'38"W 41.89 N89°54'25"W 3 7.0 0 S 8 5 °0 4'4 1"E 29.78 N61°57'20"W 5 0.6 3 N 4 9 ° 1 0'2 3" E 4 1.9 4 N 8 4 ° 3 6'2 5 " E Easement along Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION Easement along Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION 471.41 N89°36'01"W East line of the Southeast Quarter of Sec. 23, Twp. 119, Rng. 23 Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Sec. 23, Twp. 119, Rng 23 60.00 S00°05'35"W 2577.68 S00°05'35"W Southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Sec. 23, Twp. 119, Rng 23 POINT OF BEGINNING PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE LIC. NO. PROJ. NO. SURVEY EASEMENT VACATION DANIEL J. ROEBER NOVEMBER 4, 2024 43133 193806728_V602.dwg 193806728 SHEET 2 OF 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SCALE IN FEET 2200110 CORRECTIVE FIRST AMENDMENT TO MASTER DECLARATION FOR RUSH CREEK RESERVE This Corrective First Amendment to Master Declaration (the “Corrective First Amendment”) is made as of April 14, 2023, by M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Declarant”). Statement of Facts A. That certain Master Declaration for Rush Creek Reserve dated June 2, 2021, recorded as Doc. No. 10975121 (A), as supplemented by First Supplemental Declaration dated March 21, 2022, recorded as Doc. No. 11124332(A) (collectively, the “Declaration”) has been established over that certain residential development located on certain real property defined therein located in Hennepin County, Minnesota. B. Pursuant to Section 12.2 of the Declaration, the Declaration may be amended by a vote of at least sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Owners (as defined in the Declaration) eligible to vote. C. At the time the original First Amendment was executed, Declarant did not have the ability to provide complete detail about the wetland mitigation maintenance agreement applicable to the Property contemplated therein, but on the date this Corrective First Amendment is executed the details about such obligations are now available and the City is requiring that the Declaration reference to the specific wetland mitigation document. D. The sole purpose of this Corrective First Amendment is to include a reference to that certain Agreement to Establish the M/I Homes Reserve Mitigation Bank dated May 22, 2024, between Declarant and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the “Mitigation Agreement”) to satisfy the City. E. On the date hereof, Declarant is the fee owner of more than sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Lots in Rush Creek Reserve. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby amends the Declaration as follows: 1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein, but not expressly defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Declaration. 2. Operations Agreement Definition. Section 1.23 of the Declaration is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: “1.23 “Operations Agreement” shall mean collectively that certain: (i) Stormwater Maintenance Agreement(s) executed by the City and Declarant on or before, or even 2. after, the date hereof, which is (are) intended to be recorded against the Property; and (ii) Agreement to Establish the M/I Homes Reserve Mitigation Bank dated May 22, 2024 executed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Declarant regarding the Property.” 3. Wetland Definition. The following is hereby inserted as Section 1.37 of the Declaration: “1.37 “Wetland” shall mean Outlot E, Rush Creek Reserve Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.” 4. Wetland Mitigation Definition. The following is hereby inserted as Section 1.38 of the Declaration: “1.38 “Wetland Mitigation” shall mean the wetland restoration, buffers, signage and fencing that were required to be constructed or installed by Master Declarant on, adjacent to or under the Wetlands.” 5. Wetland Owner Definition. The following is hereby inserted as Section 1.39 of the Declaration: “1.39 “Wetland Owner” shall mean Master Declarant or its successor or assignee as the then owner of the Wetlands.” 6. Parking. Section 3.7 of the Declaration is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: “3.7 Parking. No boats, snowmobiles, trailers, camping vehicles, buses, camper tops, “all terrain vehicles”, tractor/trailers, trucks in excess of 9,000 pounds gross weight of unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall at anytime be stored or parked or any Lot outside of a house or garage or on any part of the Common Elements.” 7. Duties of Association. Section 8.3 of the Declaration is hereby supplemented by inserting the following at the end of Section 8.3: “For the purpose of clarification and edification of the obligations of Wetland Owner with respect to the Wetlands, such obligations are as follows: (a) Maintenance of the Wetland Mitigation. Wetland Owner shall be responsible for maintaining the Wetland Mitigation and for observing all laws governing the operation and maintenance of the Wetland Mitigation. Wetland Owner shall provide the City with a schedule acceptable to the City for the periodic inspection of the Wetland Mitigation by Wetland Owner. Wetland Owner shall make all such scheduled inspections, keep records of all inspections and maintenance activities, and submit such records annually to the City. The cost of all inspections and maintenance of the Wetland Mitigation, shall be the obligation of Wetland Owner. 3. (b) City’s Maintenance Rights. The City may maintain the Wetland Mitigation, as provided in this paragraph, if the City reasonably believes that Wetland Owner has failed to maintain the Wetland Mitigation in accordance with applicable rules, laws and performance guidelines, and if such failure continues for 30 days after the City gives Wetland Owner written notice of such failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that Wetland Owner is making a good faith effort to complete said task, however in no event shall Wetland Owner be provided with more than 60 days from the date of notice to abate the violations. The City’s notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. If Wetland Owner does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the Wetlands to perform such maintenance tasks. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to Wetland Owner, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. If Wetland Owner fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses in maintaining the Wetland Mitigation within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Wetlands. Master Declarant, on behalf of itself and its successor and assigns, acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding the Wetland Mitigation benefits the Wetlands in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an emergency, as determined by the city engineer, the 30-day notice requirement to Wetland Owner for failure to perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety by Wetland Owner, and Wetland Owner shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any expense so incurred by the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has been given. (c) Hold Harmless. Wetland Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from Wetland Owner’s, or Wetland Owner’s agents’ or employees’ negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of the obligations in subpart (a) of this Section 8.3, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents or employees to take any other reasonable prudent precautions. In the event the City, upon the failure of Wetland Owner to comply with any conditions of such subpart (a), performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in subpart (b) of this Section 8.3, Wetland Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives for its own negligent acts in the performance of Wetland Owner’s required work under such subpart (a), but this indemnification shall not extend to 4. intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. (d) Costs of Enforcement. Wetland Owner agrees to reimburse the City for all costs prudently incurred by the City in the enforcement of subparts (a)-(c) of this Section 8.3, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.” 8. Construction. Except as hereby amended, the Declaration shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. If there is any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Declaration and the terms and provisions of this Corrective First Amendment, this Corrective First Amendment shall control. (remainder of page is blank – signature page follows) 5. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has executed this Corrective First Amendment as of the day and year first above written. DECLARANT: M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL, LLC By: _________________________________ _________________________________ (Print Name) Its: _____________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on ___________________ ______, 2025, by _____________________________, the ______________________ of M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL, LLC, a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Delaware, on behalf of the company. Notary Public ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CONFIRMATION The undersigned hereby acknowledges the forgoing Corrective First Amendment and confirms that the necessary percentage of Owners approving such amendment had been met as of the date of the original First Amendment. RUSH CREEK RESERVE MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. By: (Print Name) Its: Date: ___________________ _____, 2025 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 8300 Norman Center Drive, Suite 1000 Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060 (952) 835-3800 4902-6785-1278, v. 2 North line of OUTLOT D, RUSH CREEK RESERVE ADDITION FND 1-INCH OPEN IP 4 0 8 .0 1 R = 5 6 7 8 . 7 7 Δ = 0 4 ° 0 7'0 0 " C B = N 3 8 ° 2 0'4 1 " W N 00°03'25"W 849.88 WET LAND WET LAND WET LANDWETLAND WET LAND WET LAND S89°36'01"E 406.23 MATCHLINE N59°31'02"W 119.70 N89°36'01"W 1700.51 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 6 2 Δ =0 9 °1 5 '2 2 " 6 8 .6 6 2 7 5 .0 5 R =8 5 0 .0 0 Δ =3 5 °0 1 '1 5 " N89°56'35"E 40.53 R=303.03 Δ=37°26'12" 198.00 CB=S69°18'35"E Δ=41°29'40"201.35 CB=S71°14'25"E Δ=30°01'27" 158.79 130.97Δ=22°52'33" CB=S67°19'53"E S00°03'25"E 70.44 39.28 Δ=07°25'39" 1 6 3 . 4 6 R = 2 5 0 . 0 0 Δ = 3 7 ° 2 7 ' 4 6 " 4 2 7 . 6 4 S 3 7 ° 3 1'1 1 " E 2 7 7 .6 4 1 5 0 .0 0 1 4 8 .6 8 N 5 2 °2 8'5 4 "E 6 7 1 .4 5 R =6 9 5 .2 7 Δ=55°19'58" 100.29R=483.02Δ=11°53'46" Δ =0 8 °5 0 '0 0 " 6 5 .5 2 4 8 . 6 1 Δ = 0 6 ° 3 3 ' 1 4 "Δ =1 0 °2 2 '3 8 " 7 6 .9 8 3.97Δ=00°15'37"Δ =0 3 °3 5 '0 0 " 5 4 .7 2 Δ =0 3 °3 1 '1 3 " 5 3 .7 6 5 3 . 7 6 Δ = 0 3 ° 3 1 ' 1 3 "Δ =2 0 °4 9 '3 0 " 3 0 8 .9 5 Δ=56°42'16" R=400.00 3 9 5 .8 7 2 3 .1 5 N 7 5 °4 4 '5 0 "E 5 5 . 7 2 Δ = 0 3 ° 3 8 ' 5 4 " 5 3 . 9 7 Δ = 0 3 ° 3 2 ' 0 3 " 4 2 . 1 2 Δ = 0 2 ° 4 5 ' 2 9 " 1 2 . 3 2 1 0.8 3 4 4 . 2 2 Δ = 0 5 ° 5 7 ' 3 9 " 5 2 .4 9 Δ = 0 7 ° 0 4 ' 3 4 "52.49 Δ=07°04'34" 52.49 Δ=07°04'34" 19.99 Δ=02°41'43" 52.49 Δ=07°04'34" 52.49 Δ=07°04'34" CB=S52°18'19"E Δ=15°49'15" 117.35 161.28 S02°06'43"W 3 6.4 6 S 4 9 ° 1 0'1 8" W 5 3.1 9 S 4 8 ° 3 2'4 1" W 5 3.1 9 S 4 4 ° 5 8'3 3" W 53.19 S41°24'24" W 53.19S37°50'16"W 53.19S34°16'08"W 53.19S30°40'59"W 59.82S28°05'48"W 76.27 S36°37'07"W 120.07 N 48°32'50" W 1 3 8 .3 6 R =2 7 5 .0 0 Δ =2 8 °4 9'3 7 " C B =S 5 5 °5 1'5 8 "W 2 6 . 7 8 S 0 0 ° 2 3 ' 5 9 " W Δ = 5 0 ° 0 5 ' 2 8 " R = 3 5 5 . 0 0 3 1 0 . 3 6 23.65R=338.88 Δ=03°59'55" CB=S42°09'57"E 2 3 .3 5 R =4 1 0 .0 0 Δ =0 3 °1 5 '4 6 " C B =N 4 6 °0 6 '3 8 "W 53.47 S42°27'06"W 204.32 S06°07'15"W 1 8 .5 7 R =4 6 5 .0 0 Δ =0 2 °1 7'1 8 " 95.14N75°19'22"W 66.14N74°42'36"W54.42 N76°01'46"W54.42 N81°42'02"W 54.42 N87°22'19"W5 6 . 9 2 S 8 6 ° 4 9 ' 4 0 " W 5 8 . 0 1 S 8 0 ° 5 0 ' 4 5 " W 5 6 . 1 2 S 7 4 ° 5 3 ' 2 3 " W 5 6 . 1 2 S 6 9 ° 0 2 ' 2 7 " W 5 7 . 7 7 S 6 3 ° 0 6 ' 4 8 " W 5 4 . 8 2 S 5 7 ° 1 3 '5 4 " W 5 4.4 5 S 5 2 ° 4 7'2 1 " W135.0 0 S 5 2 °2 8'4 9 "W 1 4 1 .9 3 S 5 1 °4 6'0 1 "W 3 1.73 S3 7 °3 1 '11"E 1 4 5 .1 5 N 3 6 ° 1 7'1 2 " W 10.13R=1655.52Δ=00°21'03"CB=N36°27'43"W N0 0 ° 0 3 ' 2 5 " W 27 2 . 2 1 9 2 .1 2 N 6 2 °0 0 '4 1 "E 146.40 N23°26'40"E N 2 1 ° 0 0 ' 4 4 " W 1 4 6 . 4 0 N62°58'03"W 135.17 24.91N89°36'01"W S 6 9 °3 7 '3 5 "W 1 3 6 .8 5 S26°49'06"W 178.15 79.57 S16°57'44"W 30 9 . 3 6 30 0 . 4 5 32 . 3 6 30 . 8 1 10 5 . 3 3 59 . 2 3 59 . 1 1 1 0 .0 2 49 . 2 7 5.23Δ=01°05'22" 3 9 .5 0 Δ =0 8 °1 3 '4 7 " 4 0 .1 0 Δ =0 8 °2 1 '1 6 " 3 9 .1 7 Δ =0 8 °0 9 '4 0 " 4 0 .7 5 Δ =0 8 °2 9 '2 6 " 1 5.0 6 Δ =0 3°0 8'1 5" 2 6 .3 0 4 3.3 3 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 5 4.7 7 5 4.2 9 5 1.1 8 4 3.3 6 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 3.3 4 4 4.5 3 1 2 0 .0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'0 2 "E 1 2 0 .0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'0 2 "E 1 2 0 .0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'0 2 "E 1 2 0 .0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'0 2 "E 1 2 0 .0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'0 2 "E 1 2 0 .0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'0 2 "E 1 2 0 .0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'0 2 "E 1 2 0 .0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'0 2 "E 1 2 0 .0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'0 2 "E 1 2 0 .0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'4 9 "E 1 2 0 .8 1 N 5 7 °0 8 '5 2 "E 1 2 7 .8 7 N 6 3 °1 0 '5 4 "E 1 3 8 .9 9 N 7 3 °0 1 '4 6 "E 1 2 5 .2 8 N 8 0 °3 7 '2 6 "E 120.05 N89°46'17"E 43 . 1 6 40.53 40.53 R =4 5 0 .0 0 6 2.4 3 Δ =0 7 °3 1 '5 0 "5 3 . 1 3 Δ = 0 6 ° 2 4 ' 3 3 " 5 2 . 7 9 Δ = 0 6 ° 2 2 ' 0 3 " 5 2 . 7 5 Δ = 0 6 ° 2 1 ' 4 7 " 5 2 . 7 5 Δ = 0 6 ° 2 1 ' 4 4 " 1 6 . 4 8 Δ = 0 1 ° 5 9 ' 1 7 " 4 2 . 0 3 Δ = 0 2 ° 5 5 ' 0 8 " 6 1 . 9 2 Δ = 0 4 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " 6 1 . 9 2 Δ = 0 4 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " 6 1 . 9 2 Δ = 0 4 ° 1 8 ' 0 0 " 6 2 . 0 9 Δ = 0 4 ° 1 8 ' 4 4 " 9 . 9 9 Δ = 0 0 ° 4 1 ' 3 7 " 2 3 .1 5 3 0 . 4 5 Δ = 0 4 ° 3 9 ' 0 7 " 7 2 .9 1 Δ =1 1 °0 8 '2 4 "72.91 Δ=11°08'24"72.91Δ=11°08'24" 72.91Δ=11°08'24" 48.83 R=338.88 Δ=08°15'18" CB=N48°17'34"W 1 2 5 .0 0 S 5 7 °2 5 '2 8 "W 7 2.3 3 Δ = 1 1 ° 4 0'2 4 " 1 4 9 . 0 0 Δ = 2 4 ° 0 2 ' 5 0 " Δ=14°22'18" 89.05 4 7. 5 3 N 3 8 ° 0 4'4 5 " W 4 8.0 7 N 4 5 °0 5'0 5"W 48.43 N59°08'03"W48.53 N71°45'03"W48.53 N82°53'27"W4 8 . 5 3 S 8 5 ° 5 8 ' 0 9 " W 5 1 . 9 1 S 7 6 ° 3 5 ' 5 9 " W 5 2 . 6 7 S 7 2 ° 5 3 ' 5 0 " W 5 2 . 5 2 S 6 8 ° 3 5 ' 2 8 " W 5 2 .5 2 S 6 4 °1 7 '2 8 "W 5 2 . 5 2 S 5 9 ° 5 9 ' 2 8 " W 5 6 .4 7 S 5 6 °1 2 '4 4 "W 6 6 .5 9 S 6 0 °0 5 '2 8 "W 6 6 .6 0 S 6 6 °2 7 '1 4 "W 6 6 .6 5 S 7 2 °4 9 '0 9 "W 5 9 . 5 9 S 3 7 ° 1 2'1 3 " E 5 4 . 5 5 S 2 9 ° 3 5 ' 3 5 " E 4 6 . 7 7 51.33N83°34'26"W 1 2 0.0 0 N 5 2 °2 8'4 9 "E N 5 2 °2 2'4 3 "E 1 3 4 .0 8 1 2 0 .9 8 N 5 8 °2 5 '3 2 "E 1 2 0 .9 4 N 7 3 °2 8 '3 6 "E 7 2.1 2 5 1.6 4 4.22 Δ = 2 0 ° 5 9 ' 4 7 " 8 2 . 4 5 Δ = 1 6 ° 2 7 ' 5 9 " 6 4 . 6 6 7 6 . 8 7 S 0 6 ° 1 1 ' 5 5 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 S 1 3 ° 5 9 ' 5 0 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 S 2 0 ° 2 1 ' 5 3 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 S 2 6 ° 4 3 ' 4 0 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 S 3 3 ° 0 5 ' 2 4 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 S 3 2 ° 0 9 ' 3 2 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 S 2 7 ° 5 1 ' 3 2 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 S 2 3 ° 3 3 ' 3 2 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 S 1 9 ° 1 5 ' 3 2 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 S 1 4 ° 5 6 ' 4 7 " E S 0 9 ° 3 6 ' 0 3 " E 1 2 5 . 0 0 S01°32'21"W 12 5.00 S12°40'45"W 125.00 S23°49'09"W 125.00 S34°57'33"W 126.25 125.33 1 2 5.0 0 S 4 6 °0 5'5 7"W N 6 9 °2 2 '0 0 "E 5 4 .4 4 N 56 °5 8 '2 7 "E 6 2 .4 7 N 5 9 °1 0 '0 6 "E 5 3 .1 0 N 6 0 °3 1 '3 4 "E 6 1 .3 7 N 6 4 °0 2 '4 7 "E 6 1 .3 7 N 6 7 °3 7 '5 1 "E 6 3 .6 0 N 7 1 °1 3 '1 9 "E 6 1 .6 1 N 7 4 °4 6 '4 9 "E 6 0 .4 0 N 7 8 °0 2 '4 9 "E 6 7 .9 1 N 8 5 °1 1 '4 7 "E 6 7 .7 8 S87°42'21"E 67.78 S80°26'03"E70.69 S70°48'51"E70.71 S63°42'58"E67.78 41.02 S63°55'08"E 124.14 N29°47'03"E 124.19 N22°42'29"E 124.42 N14°17'12"E N14°16'56"E 124.21124.20 N05°51'38"EN01°12'56"W 124.16 N 0 8 ° 1 7 ' 3 1 " W 1 2 4 . 1 1 N 1 4 ° 1 5 ' 1 0 " W 1 2 3 . 8 6 1 2 4 . 0 0 N 1 7 ° 0 0 ' 3 9 " W 1 2 4 . 0 0 N 2 0 ° 3 2 ' 4 2 " W 1 2 4 . 0 0 N 2 4 ° 1 1 ' 3 6 " W 1 2 4 . 0 0 N 2 7 ° 4 2 ' 5 0 " W 1 2 4 . 0 0 N 3 1 ° 1 4 ' 0 3 " W 1 2 4 . 0 0 N 3 4 ° 4 9 ' 0 3 " W 1 2 4 . 0 0 N 2 5 ° 4 9 ' 2 0 " W N 1 5 ° 2 6 ' 4 1 " W 1 2 4 . 0 0 1 1 5.9 8 6 5 .9 4 4 9 .0 6 8 5 .0 0 3 8 .6 8 5 9 .4 5 7 4 .6 3 N 5 5 °2 8 '4 1 "E 6 3 .1 5 N 5 9 °4 4 '0 8 "E 6 3 .1 5 N 6 3 °5 9 '3 4 "E 6 3 .1 5 N 6 8 °1 5 '0 1 "E 6 3 .1 5 N 7 2 °3 0 '2 8 "E 6 3 .1 5 N 7 6 °4 5 '5 5 "E 6 3 .1 5 N 8 1 °1 1 '0 9 "E 6 3 .1 5 N 8 5 °4 6 '1 0 "E 6 7 .9 8 S89°48'36"E 63.15 S85°33'09"E 63.15 S81°17'42"E63.15 S77°02'15"E63.15 S77°40'27"E118.79 63.01 55.78 1 2 . 2 9 S 8 2 ° 3 1 ' 2 5 " E 1 2 4 . 8 0 N 3 7 ° 3 1'1 1 " W 1 2 4 . 9 7 N 3 6 ° 3 9'0 3 " W 8.50 Δ=00°40'35" 5 3 . 8 8 Δ = 0 4 ° 1 7 '1 0 " 5 3 . 8 9 Δ = 0 4 ° 1 7 ' 1 3 " 5 3 . 9 0 Δ = 0 4 ° 1 7 ' 1 6 " 5 3 . 9 1 Δ = 0 4 ° 1 7 ' 1 8 " 5 3 . 9 1 Δ = 0 4 ° 1 7 ' 1 9 " 5 3 . 9 2 Δ = 0 4 ° 1 7 ' 2 0 " 5 8 . 0 5 Δ = 0 4 ° 3 7 ' 0 3 " 5 8 .0 5 Δ = 0 4 ° 3 7 '0 3 " 5 3.9 1 Δ =0 4 ° 1 7 '1 9 " 53.90 Δ=04°17'17" 53.90 Δ=04°17'14" 53.89 Δ=04°17'11" 31.99 Δ=02°32'40" 24.84 Δ=03°06'25" Δ=08°47'21"70.26 22.68 37.71 128.91 N14°36'19"EN15°05'28"E 124.90 N10°50'01"E 124.74 N06°34'34"E 124.61 N02°19'08"E 5261 1 2 4 . 8 0 N 3 2 ° 2 3 '3 6 " W 1 2 4 . 6 7 N 2 8 ° 0 8 ' 0 9 " W 1 2 4 . 5 5 N 2 3 ° 5 2 ' 4 2 " W 1 2 4 . 4 7 N 1 9 ° 3 7 ' 1 5 " W 1 2 4 . 4 2 N 1 5 ° 2 1 ' 4 8 " W 1 2 4 . 4 0 N 1 1 ° 0 6 ' 2 2 " W 1 2 4 . 4 0 N 0 6 ° 3 1 ' 2 0 " W 1 24.45 N 01°56 '19"W 6 6 .7 5 Δ =0 5 °4 2 '2 2 " 1 8 . 2 2 Δ = 0 1 ° 3 3 ' 2 6 7 1 .5 3 Δ =0 6 °0 6 '5 2 " 6 8 .9 6 Δ =0 5 °5 3 '4 1 " 6 8 .9 7 Δ =0 5 °5 3 '4 3 " 7 3 .5 8 Δ =0 6 °1 7 '2 3 " 6 9 .3 7 Δ =0 5 °5 5 '4 7 " 66.86 Δ=05°42'55"66.85Δ=05°42'51"66.83Δ=05°42'45" 9.40 Δ=00°48'13" 47.29 Δ=05°20'01" 58.19Δ=06°33'45" 2 2.6 8 116.61 25.00 25.0022.68S83°52'45"E 124.91 N12°27'39"E 125.25 N11°08'06"E N16°48'23"E 125.03125.41 N05°27'49"E 125.53 N00°12'27"W 1 2 5 . 5 9 N 0 5 ° 5 2 ' 4 4 " W 1 2 5 . 6 0 N 1 2 ° 5 8 ' 0 1 " W 1 2 5 . 5 5 N 1 8 ° 4 8 ' 5 8 " W 1 2 5 . 4 4 N 2 4 ° 3 9 ' 5 5 " W1 2 5 . 2 7 N 3 0 ° 5 6 ' 4 5 " W N 3 6 ° 2 3 '5 5 " W 1 2 5 . 0 7 1 2 5 .0 0 N 3 7 ° 3 1'1 1 " W 1 2 5 .0 0 8 5 .0 0 2 5 .0 0 2 5.0 0 25 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 25 25 25 25 2 5 2 5 25 25 25 2 5 2 5 O U T L O T D OUTLOT A OUTLOT B OUTLOT C 1 2 0 .0 0 2 1 .9 3 5 9 4 . 8 1 N 3 7 ° 3 1'1 1 " W 4 0 . 2 6 W A L N U T L A N E WALNUTLANE W A L N U T L A N E X Y L O I D A V E . 7 9 T H P L A C E Drainage & Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT B Drainage & Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT A D r ain a g e & U tilit y E a s e m e n t o v e r all o f O U T L O T D OUTLOT B Drainage & Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT B 8 3 8 3 5 0 50 5 0 60 6 0 NOT TANGENT Drainage & Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT C SEE DETAIL 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 14.21Δ = 02°32'57" 4 3 .0 6 72.91 Δ=11°08'24" 48.83 R = 338.88 Δ = 08°15'18" CB = N48°17'34"W S23°49'09"W 126.25 125.33 18 17 W ALNUT LANE 25 25 25 W ID T H VA RIES VICINITY MAP BEARING ORIENTATION BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT D, RUSH CREEK RESERVE ADDITION WHICH HAS AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST. PLUG INSCRIBED WITH "STANTEC 43133" IRON MONUMENT SET WITH PLASTIC DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH DENOTES 1/2 IRON MONUMENT, GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 10 5 510 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AND BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIMENSIONED. DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS (NOT TO SCALE) C.S.A.H.10 C.S.A.H.50 SITE FLETCHER LANE NOT TO SCALE RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS C.R. DOC. NO. _______________________ S I T E DETAIL GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 DENOTES DELINEATED WET LAND FOUND RLS 43133 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND, MARKED AS FOUND S00°05'35"W 1784.37 617.66 N89°26'36"W FN D 1 / 2 I N C H IP O P E N 10 S 4 4 °0 5'3 7" W 3 7 3.4 0 1 2 1 .9 9 N 3 7 °1 8 '3 0 "W 42.66 N41°27'14"W 6 4.4 8 R =3 2 5.0 0 Δ =1 1°2 2'0 5" 4 8.9 2 R = 1 0 0.00 Δ = 2 8°01'5 2" 5 3.30 R = 4 8.00 Δ = 6 3°37'1 1" 60.00N54°28'22"W 15.01 R=108.00Δ=7°57'39"CB=N39°30'27"E 4 5 4 . 6 0 R = 5 2 5 . 0 0 Δ = 4 9 ° 3 6 '4 5 " C B = N 4 7 ° 0 6 ' 4 5 " E 9 7.6 1 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6 " E 43.86 N17°21'36"W 2 5 2 .9 6 N 4 0 °2 7'5 2 "W 5 0 .7 1 N 2 1 °5 0 '0 1 "W 101.30R=501.96Δ=11°33'47"CB=N16°53'55"E S78°44'44"E 125.00 176.93N06°07'17"E 80.70 N02°55'44"E68.1 4 N 0 4 °5 1 '4 4 "W S 7 3 ° 3 3 ' 4 0 " W 1 2 5 . 0 0 68.32N12°06'37"W 3 6 .6 6 R =4 1 5 .0 0 Δ =0 5 °0 3 '4 2 " C B =N1 8 °0 3 '5 0 "W 74.35N07°58'09"E 1 5 0.8 7 N 5 0 ° 1 9'4 5 " E 5 9.3 3 N 4 9 ° 3 0'1 5"E 7 1.2 1 N 4 5 °5 1'3 4"E 7 1.19 N 42°2 9'06"E 60.25 N 39°11'44"E 60.25 N36°10'50"E 60.25 N33°09'56"E 71.19 N29°52'35"E 57.84 N30°56'27"E 5 0 .7 3 N 5 6 °2 5 '4 6 "E 1 2 0 .0 0 N 0 5 °3 6 '4 8 "W 5 7 .8 7 N 8 3 °2 8 '0 7 "E S8 9 ° 3 6 ' 0 1 " E 40 6 . 2 3 48.95 S61°57'20"E 67.59 R=325.00 Δ=11°54'57" CB=S55°59'52"E 1 2 3.6 4 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6 " E 2 9 5.0 0 S 4 1 °2 7'1 4 "E 5 2.7 3 S 4 2 °4 1'0 1"E 51.04 S57°51'32"E 53.12 S77°12'08"E 54.94 S89°21'56"E N 8 1 ° 2 8 ' 2 6 " E 5 8 . 6 8 N 6 7 ° 2 3 ' 2 6 " E 5 2 . 3 8 N 5 4 ° 0 4'4 8 " E 5 2 .4 1 N40°54'44"E 51.26 N27°58'49"E50.56 N13°54'25"E55.99 N 0 3 °5 4 '1 2 "W 5 6 .2 0N20°5 7 '1 3 "W 5 1 .1 3 N 2 8 °2 5 '4 4 "W 6 7 .3 6 N 2 2 °3 9 '0 7 "W 6 5 .0 3 N 1 6 °5 2 '2 2 "W 6 5 .0 3 N 1 0 °3 4 '0 2 "W 7 6 .8 6N04°1 5 '3 9 "W 6 5 .0 5 N 2 2 °0 8 '5 3 "W 1 7 1 .7 9 N 0 3 °3 4 '1 4 "W 6 0 .9 5 38.40 N16°55'55"E 33.02 N20°15'37"E N37°41'05"E 55.00 3 3 .0 2 N 5 5 °0 6 '3 3 "E 3 8 .4 0 N 5 8 °2 6 '1 5 "E 6 5 . 0 0 N 7 8 ° 5 6 ' 2 5 " E 38.40S80°33'26"E 33.02S77°13'44"E S59°48'16"E 55.00 33.02 S42°22'48"E 1 2 0.0 0 S 4 9 ° 1 3'2 2 " W 2 0 .0 0 R =6 1 .0 0 Δ =1 8 °4 7 '0 8 " C B =S 3 1 °2 3 '0 4 "E N 6 8 ° 0 0 ' 3 0 " E 1 3 4 . 3 3 1193.90590.47 174.86 N 47°57'11"W N 4 3 °1 6'4 3"W 7 5.8 8 4 0 .4 5 N 2 2 °1 5 '5 4 "E63.5 7 N00°05'35"E 321.32 2 7 2.0 1 CB=S55°59'52"E Δ=11°54'57" 67.59 N 4 1 °2 7'1 4"W 2 3 2.0 0 N51°53'03"W 140.54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 17 1210 MATCHLINE N59°31'02"W 119.70 N8 9 ° 3 6 ' 0 1 " W 17 0 0 . 5 1 7 8 T H P L A C E 78TH PLACE OUTLOT E OUTLOT G OUTLOT F Drainage & Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT E 5 0 50 6 0 60 60 60 60 6 0 1 0 1.3 9 S HE ET 4 OF 4 SHE E T S Drainage & Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT G Drainage & Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT F 8 7 2 7 . 5 7 R = 5 2 5 . 0 0 Δ = 0 3 ° 0 0 ' 3 2 " 5 0 WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND 5 0 SEE INSE T RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 10 5 510 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AND BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIMENSIONED. DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS (NOT TO SCALE) C.R. DOC. NO. _______________________ VICINITY MAP BEARING ORIENTATION BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT D, RUSH CREEK RESERVE ADDITION WHICH HAS AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST. (SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS) C.S.A.H. 1 0 C.S.A.H.50 SITE FLETCHER LANE NOT TO SCALE S I T E PLUG INSCRIBED WITH "STANTEC 43133" IRON MONUMENT SET WITH PLASTIC DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH DENOTES 1/2 IRON MONUMENT, DENOTES DELINEATED WET LAND FOUND RLS 43133 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND, MARKED AS FOUND S 4 4 ° 0 5'3 7" W 3 7 3.4 0 7 8 T H P L A C E 1 2 1 .9 9 N 3 7 °1 8 '3 0 "W 4 2.6 6 N 4 1 °2 7'1 4 "W 6 4.48 R =3 25.00 Δ =1 1°22'05" 48.92 R=100.00 Δ=28°01'52" Δ = 6 3 ° 3 7 ' 1 1 " R = 4 8 . 0 0 5 3 . 3 0 60.00 N54°28'22"W 1 5 . 0 1 R = 1 0 8 . 0 0 Δ = 7 ° 5 7 ' 3 9 " C B = N 3 9 ° 3 0 ' 2 7 " E 4 5 4 . 6 0 R = 5 2 5 . 0 0 Δ = 4 9 ° 3 6 '4 5 " C B = N 4 7 ° 0 6 '4 5 " E 9 7 . 6 1 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6 " E 4 3 .8 6 N 1 7 °2 1 '3 6 "W 2 5 2 .9 6 N 4 0 °2 7'5 2 "W 5 0 .7 1 N 2 1 °5 0 '0 1 "W 20.19 S34°35'55"E 4 8.4 6 R =4 0 5.0 0 Δ =0 6 °5 1'1 9 " 174.86 N 47°57'11"W N 4 3 °1 6'4 3"W 7 5.8 8 N22°15'54"E40.45 6 3.5 7 N00°05'35"E 321.32 2 7 2.0 1 N 4 1 °2 7'1 4"W 2 3 2.0 0 N51°53'03"W 140.54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 17 1210 N 4 1 °2 7'1 4 "W 1 5 0.8 6 1 8 1 .2 8 R =2 5 0 .0 0 Δ =4 1 °3 2 '4 8 " S00°05'35"W 119.86 48.24R=78.00Δ=35°26'03" CB=S17°48'36"W N 6 8 ° 2 9 ' 5 1 " E 8 5 . 0 0 N 6 8 ° 2 9 ' 5 1 " E 8 5 . 0 0 8 5 . 0 0 N 6 8 ° 2 9 ' 5 1 " E 3 6 .0 0 3 8 .1 8 2 6 .3 3 3 6 .0 0 3 8 .1 8 2 6 .3 3 S 2 1 °3 0 '0 9 "E 1 0 0 .5 1 S78°53'34"E 85.00 36.00 38.18 26.33 36.00 38.18 26.33S11°06'26"E 100.51 85.00 S78°53'34"E S78°53'34"E 85.00 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 8 5.0 0 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 8 5.0 0 8 5.0 0 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 3 6.0 0 3 8.1 8 2 6.3 3 3 6.0 0 3 8.1 8 2 6.3 3 S 4 1 °2 7'1 4 "E 1 0 0.5 1 S 4 1 °2 7'1 4 "E 1 0 0.5 1 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 8 5.0 0 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 8 5.0 0 8 5.0 0 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 3 6.0 0 3 8.1 8 2 6.3 3 3 6.0 0 3 8.1 8 2 6.3 3 S 4 1 °2 7'1 4 "E 1 0 0.5 1 S 4 1 °2 7'1 4 "E 1 0 0.5 1 36.00 36.00 26.33 26.33 38.18 38.18 N 8 9 ° 5 4 ' 2 5 " W 8 5 . 0 0 N 8 9 ° 5 4 ' 2 5 " W 8 5 . 0 0 N 8 9 ° 5 4 ' 2 5 " W 8 5 . 0 0 S78°53'34"E 85.00 N8 9 ° 5 4 ' 2 5 " W 85 . 0 0 N 6 8 ° 2 9 ' 5 1 " E 8 5 . 0 0 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 8 5.0 0 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 8 5.0 0 S00°05'35"W 100.51 S00°05'35"W 100.51 S00°05'35"W 126.84 S00°05'35"W 126.84 N8 9 ° 5 4 ' 2 5 " W 85 . 0 0 N8 9 ° 5 4 ' 2 5 " W 85 . 0 0 N8 9 ° 5 4 ' 2 5 " W 85 . 0 0 N8 9 ° 5 4 ' 2 5 " W 85 . 0 0 85 . 0 0 N8 9 ° 5 4 ' 2 5 " W S11°06'26"E 100.51 S 2 1 °3 0 '0 9 "E 1 0 0 .5 1 S 4 1 °2 7'1 4"E 1 2 6.8 4 S 4 1 °2 7'1 4"E 1 2 6.8 4 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 8 5.0 0 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 8 5.0 0 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 8 5.0 0 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 8 5.0 0 8 5.0 0 N 4 8 ° 3 2'4 6" E 3 8.1 8 2 6.3 3 2 6.3 3 3 6.0 0 3 8.1 8 2 6.3 3 2 6.3 3 3 6.0 0 S 3 8 °5 3'5 3 "E 1 2 6.8 4 S 3 8 °5 3'5 3 "E 1 2 6.8 4 N 5 1 ° 0 6'0 7 " E 8 5.0 0 3 8.1 8 2 6.3 3 2 6.3 3 3 6.0 0 3 8.1 8 2 6.3 3 3 6.0 0 2 6.3 3 N 5 1 ° 0 6'0 7 " E 8 5.0 0 N 5 1 ° 0 6'0 7 " E 8 5.0 0 N 5 1 ° 0 6'0 7 " E 8 5.0 0 N 5 1 ° 0 6'0 7 " E 8 5.0 0 38.18 26.33 26.33 36.00 3 8.18 2 6.33 3 6.0026.33 Δ =0 6 °5 1'1 9 " 5 2 .0 5 Δ =0 6 °5 1'1 9 " 4 4 .8 7 2 0 .3 5 2 1 .7 6 1 5 0.8 6 1 5 0.8 6 2 0 3 .0 4 Δ =4 1 °3 2 '4 8 " 1 5 9 .5 3 Δ =4 1 °3 2 '4 8 " 119.86 119.86 29.69 Δ=35°26'03" CB=S17°48'36"W 66.79Δ=35°26'03" CB=S17°48'36"W 2 8 .8 8 S 1 0 °1 7 '5 7 "W 1 3.75 S33°31'28"E 18.86 S52°24'48"W C B = N 4 8 ° 3 5'0 6 " E Δ = 0 9 ° 4 6'2 5 " 8 9.5 5 C B = N 6 5 ° 5 8 ' 1 9 " E Δ = 0 1 1 ° 5 3 ' 3 6 " 1 0 8 . 9 8 3 0 .04 Δ =0 3 °1 6 '44 " C B =N 5 8 °2 3 '0 9 "E 3 0 .0 0 Δ =0 3 °1 6'2 8 " C B =N 5 5°0 6 '3 3"E 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 30 30 30.00 30.00 1 0 1.3 9 2 1.0 5 N 3 1 °2 0'1 7 "E 6.8 7 S 4 1 °2 4'5 4 "E 7 5.6 5 S 4 1 °4 7'4 3"E 6.16 S41°23'24"E S 2 7°28 '4 1 "E 2 2 .9 6 59.12N08°57'37"E 18.02S16°50'55"E S83°51'49"E 34.78 35.47 36.19 N 8 5 ° 2 1 ' 4 2" E 1 2 1 .4 4 N8 9 ° 5 4 ' 2 5 " W 1 1 6 . 7 9 26.52 Δ =05°25'36" Δ=06°29'08" 31.69 D RAIN AGE & UTI LITY E AS EMENT OUTLOT G 78TH PLACE 7 8 12.31 1 5 1 5 5 0 5 0 6 0 6 0 81.80 Δ=43°23'42" 2 5 .5 4 2 8 . 3 7 RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 10 5 510 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AND BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIMENSIONED. DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS (NOT TO SCALE) C.R. DOC. NO. _______________________ VICINITY MAP BEARING ORIENTATION BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT D, RUSH CREEK RESERVE ADDITION WHICH HAS AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST. (SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS) C.S.A.H.10 C.S.A.H.50 SITE FLETCHER LANE NOT TO SCALE S I T E INSET PLUG INSCRIBED WITH "STANTEC 43133" IRON MONUMENT SET WITH PLASTIC DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH DENOTES 1/2 IRON MONUMENT, DENOTES DELINEATED WET LAND FOUND RLS 43133 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND, MARKED AS FOUND Easement Vacation Description That part of the drainage and utility easement dedicated over, under, and across Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Outlot E; thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, assumed bearing along the east line of said Outlot E, a distance of 42.53 feet; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds West, 41.89 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 01 degree 40 minutes 58 seconds West, 30.32 feet; thence South 07 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds West, 71.19 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 40 seconds East, 171.48 feet; thence North 60 degrees 43 minutes 49 seconds West, 82.32 feet; thence South 50 degrees 49 minutes 45 seconds West, 86.46 feet; thence South 06 degrees 45 minutes 17 seconds West, 38.27 feet; thence South 11 degrees 44 minutes 13 seconds West, 64.77 feet; thence South 25 degrees 58 minutes 41 seconds East, 54.68 feet to the boundary of said Outlot E; thence South 78 degrees 56 minutes 25 seconds West, 65.00 feet; thence South 58 degrees 26 minutes 15 seconds West, 38.40 feet; thence South 55 degrees 06 minutes 33 seconds West, 33.02 feet; thence South 37 degrees 41 minutes 05 seconds West, 55.00 feet; thence South 20 degrees 15 minutes 37 seconds West, 33.02 feet; thence South 16 degrees 55 minutes 55 seconds West, 38.40 feet; thence South 03 degrees 34 minutes 14 seconds East, 60.95 feet; thence South 22 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds East, 171.79 feet; thence South 04 degrees 15 minutes 39 seconds East, 65.05 feet; thence South 10 degrees 34 minutes 02 seconds East, 76.86 feet; thence South 16 degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds East, 65.03 feet; thence South 22 degrees 39 minutes 07 seconds East, 65.03 feet; thence South 28 degrees 25 minutes 44 seconds East, 67.36 feet; thence South 20 degrees 57 minutes 13 seconds East, 51.13 feet; thence South 03 degrees 54 minutes 12 seconds East, 56.20 feet; thence South 13 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds West, 55.99 feet; thence South 27 degrees 58 minutes 49 seconds West, 50.56 feet; thence South 40 degrees 54 minutes 44 seconds West, 51.26 feet; thence South 54 degrees 04 minutes 48 seconds West, 52.41 feet; thence South 67 degrees 23 minutes 26 seconds West, 52.38 feet; thence South 81 degrees 28 minutes 26 seconds West, 58.68 feet; thence North 89 degrees 21 minutes 56 seconds West, 54.94 feet; thence North 77 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds West, 53.12 feet; thence North 57 degrees 51 minutes 32 seconds West, 51.04 feet; thence North 42 degrees 41 minutes 01 second West, 52.73 feet; thence North 41 degrees 27 minutes 14 seconds West, 295.00 feet; thence South 48 degrees 32 minutes 46 seconds West, 113.53 feet; thence northwesterly 71.18 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 335.00 feet, a central angle of 12 degrees 10 minutes 26 seconds, a chord bearing of North 55 degrees 52 minutes 07 seconds West and having a chord length of 71.05 feet; thence North 61 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 29.78 feet; thence South 85 degrees 04 minutes 41 seconds East, 37.00 feet; thence North 84 degrees 36 minutes 25 seconds East, 41.94 feet; thence North 67 degrees 19 minutes 09 seconds East, 33.43 feet; thence North 49 degrees 10 minutes 23 seconds East, 50.63 feet; thence North 15 degrees 55 minutes 18 seconds East, 49.46 feet; thence North 07 degrees 58 minutes 09 seconds East, 75.18 feet; thence North 06 degrees 07 minutes 15 seconds East, 70.83 feet; thence North 21 degrees 01 minute 07 seconds East, 46.28 feet; thence North 50 degrees 48 minutes 49 seconds East, 46.28 feet; thence North 66 degrees 41 minutes 09 seconds East, 52.95 feet; thence North 56 degrees 48 minutes 28 seconds East, 41.09 feet; thence North 38 degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 22 degrees 32 minutes 57 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 06 degrees 52 minutes 27 seconds East, 30.00 feet; thence North 08 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds West, 30.00 feet; thence North 24 degrees 28 minutes 33 seconds West, 30.00 feet; thence North 40 degrees 18 minutes 54 seconds West, 30.63 feet; thence North 55 degrees 23 minutes 02 seconds West, 85.76 feet; thence North 37 degrees 07 minutes 11 seconds West, 58.40 feet; thence North 03 degrees 00 minutes 13 seconds West, 47.14 feet; thence North 29 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East, 53.42 feet; thence North 43 degrees 33 minutes 08 seconds East, 122.05 feet; thence North 37 degrees 25 minutes 14 seconds East, 115.39 feet; thence North 31 degrees 05 minutes 47 seconds East, 131.48 feet; thence North 47 degrees 56 minutes 19 seconds East, 59.96 feet; thence North 67 degrees 23 minutes 41 seconds East, 54.94; thence North 53 degrees 45 minutes 32 seconds East, 51.86 feet; thence North 29 degrees 59 minutes 12 seconds East, 38.72 feet; thence North 09 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds East, 38.72 feet; thence North 00 degrees 32 minutes 57 seconds West, 38.03 feet; thence South 89 degrees 36 minutes 01 second East, 71.58 feet; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 38 seconds West, 33.94 feet; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 25 seconds East, 222.17 feet to the point of beginning. PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE LIC. NO. PROJ. NO. SURVEY EASEMENT VACATION DANIEL J. ROEBER NOVEMBER 4, 2024 43133 193806728_V602.dwg 193806728 SHEET 1 OF 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. WALNUT LANE 80T H AVEN UE OUTLOT E 80TH AVENUE S89°54'25"E 222.17 Northeast corner of Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION 42.53S00°05'35"W Ea s t l i n e o f O u t l o t E , R U S H CR E E K R E S E R V E S E C O N D AD D I T I O N 17 1 . 4 8 S0 0 ° 0 0 ' 4 0 " E 7 1 .1 9 S 0 7 °4 1 '0 0 "W 3 0 .3 2 S 0 1 °4 0 '5 8 "W 82.32 N60°43'49"W S 5 0 °4 9'4 5"W 8 6.4 6 38.27 S06°45'17"W 64.77S11°44'13"W 5 4 .6 8 S 2 5 °5 8 '4 1 "E OUTLOT B 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 3 2 1 OUTLOT A 65.00 S 7 8°5 6'2 5" W 38.40 S 5 8°2 6'15" W 33.02 S55°0 6'3 3" W55.00 S37°41'05"W 33.02 S20°15'37"W 38.40 S16°55'55"W 60.95S03°34'14"E 1 7 1 . 7 9 S 2 2 ° 0 8 ' 5 3 " E 4 2 . 2 2 7 4 . 2 1 5 5 . 3 6 65.05 S04 °1 5 '3 9 "E 7 6 .8 6 S 1 0 °3 4 '0 2 "E 6 5 .0 3 S 1 6 °5 2 '2 2 "E 6 5 .0 3 S 2 2 °3 9 '0 7 "E 6 7 .3 6 S 2 8 °2 5 '4 4 "E 5 1 .1 3 S 2 0 °5 7 '1 3 "E 5 6 .2 0 S 0 3 °5 4 '1 2 "E 55.99S13°54'25"W 50.56S27°58'49"W5 1.2 6 S 40 °5 4'4 4" W 5 2 . 4 1 S 5 4 ° 0 4'4 8 " W 5 2 . 3 8 S 6 7 ° 2 3 ' 2 6 " W 5 8 . 6 8 S 8 1 ° 2 8 ' 2 6 " W 54.94 N89°21'56"W53.12 N77°12'08"W51.04 N57°51'32"W 52.73 N42°41'01"W N 4 1 °2 7'1 4" W 2 9 5.0 0 5 5.00 6 5.00 5 5.00 6 5.00 5 5.0 0 1 1 3.5 3 S 4 8 °3 2'4 6"W 71.18R=335.00 Δ=12°10'26" CB=N55°52'07"W 3 3.4 3 N 6 7 °1 9'0 9" E 49.46N15°55'18"E 75.18 N07°58'09"E 70.83N06°07'15"E 46.28 N21°01'07"E 46.28 N50°48'49"E 52.95N66°41'09"E 41.09 N56°48'28"E 30.00N38°13'27"E 30.00N22°32'57"E 30.00N06°52'27"E 30.00N08°48'03"W 3 0 .0 0 N 2 4 °2 8 '3 3 "W 3 0 .6 3 N 4 0 °1 8'5 4 "W 85.76 N55°23'02"W 5 8.4 0 N 3 7 ° 0 7'1 1 " W 4 7 .1 4 N 0 3 °0 0 '1 3 "W 53.42N29°26'30"E 1 22.05 N 43°33'08"E 115.39 N37°25'14"E 131.48 N31°05'47"E 5 9 . 9 6 N 4 7 ° 5 6 ' 1 9 " E 5 4 . 9 4 N 6 7 ° 2 3 ' 4 1 " E 5 1 . 8 6 N 5 3 ° 4 5 ' 3 2 " E 3 8.7 2 N 2 9 °5 9'1 2 "E 71.58 S89°36'01"E 38.72N09°42'47"E 38.03N00°32'57"W 33 .94 S 00 °0 7'38"W 41.89 N89°54'25"W 3 7.0 0 S 8 5°0 4'41"E 29.78 N61°57'20"W 5 0.6 3 N 4 9 ° 1 0'2 3 " E 4 1.9 4 N 8 4 ° 3 6'2 5 " E Easement along Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION Easement along Outlot E, RUSH CREEK RESERVE SECOND ADDITION 471.41 N89°36'01"W East line of the Southeast Quarter of Sec. 23, Twp. 119, Rng. 23 Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Sec. 23, Twp. 119, Rng 23 60.00 S00°05'35"W 25 7 7 . 6 8 S0 0 ° 0 5 ' 3 5 " W Southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Sec. 23, Twp. 119, Rng 23 POINT OF BEGINNING PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE LIC. NO. PROJ. NO. SURVEY EASEMENT VACATION DANIEL J. ROEBER NOVEMBER 4, 2024 43133 193806728_V602.dwg 193806728 SHEET 2 OF 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SCALE IN FEET 2200 110 Page 1 of 11 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7b. City Council Meeting: February 13, 2025 Prepared By: Natalie Davis McKeown Topic: Parks and Trails System and Park Dedication Fund Discussion Action Required: Discussion 1. Request The City Council is asked to review and discuss the Parks and Trails plan within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as well as assumptions made in the park dedication formula to inform ongoing park planning efforts. 2. Background The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes a chapter on Parks and Trails. It casts a broad vision in which Corcoran’s parks, trails, and open space system are an integral part of the community through providing recreational opportunities and the preservation of existing natural and historic resources. The chapter in its entirety is attached to this report for reference. As part of a subdivision application, the City is authorized by Minn. Stat. Sec. 462.358, Subd. 2b to require land dedication for infrastructure, including parks and recreational facilities. This is allowed under the theory that new development places new burdens on existing infrastructure. In lieu of parkland dedication where land may not be desirable, the state statute authorizes cities to accept an equivalent amount of cash dedication in lieu of land. The City’s Subdivision Ordinance is set up to utilize these tools available to support funding the larger park system. The City has accepted a number of acres of parkland dedication over the last several years. When land for parks and/or off-road trails is dedicated, the required cash contribution is reduced by an equivalent amount based on the fair market value of land. The required cash contribution collected by the City can only be used for the sole purpose of land acquisition for parks or park improvements. The City’s cash park dedication fee results in a per unit fee for single-family and multifamily units and a per acre fee for commercial and industrial land. The City’s park dedication formula went through an overhaul in 2016. It was subsequently updated in 2020 and 2022. Staff is in the process of updating based on current costs and valuations of property. While some information is outstanding (such as property valuation confirmation from the Hennepin County Assessor’s Office), it is believed the park dedication fee should likely be increased to meet the long-term vision for the Parks and Trails System. Page 2 of 11 In October 2024, plans were brought forward to City Council for the City Park Remaster project that has been in the works for a few years, with planning efforts into final stages prior to moving forward with construction (anticipated in 2025). The update in October led to several questions about funding, the use of park dedication, and the timeline for other park projects. The subsequent staff report takes a step back to address questions related to the larger Parks and Trails System as well as the park dedication fund. 3. Analysis What parkland do we have? The City of Corcoran has the following parkland: Park Name Existing Areas (Acres) Neighborhood Parks 17.3 Wildflower Park 5.13 Park near Bellwether 8 Park near Tavera 4.2 Community Parks 169.48 City Hall/Memorial Garden 8 City Park 76 OSP (Bellwether) 37 OSP (Ravinia) 36.85 OSP (Cook Lake Highlands) 8.37 Weather mesonet / OSP (Rush Creek Meadows) 3.26 Total Acres 186.81 Additionally, the City has obtained 5.19 acres for the linear park located on the east side of County Road 116 between Larkin Road and City Hall. However, the linear park appears to be considered a trail rather than a true park in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. How many acres of parkland are anticipated in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan? The 2040 Comprehensive Plan assumes a population of 11,300 by 2040. The National Recreation and Parks Association provides a metric relied on in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan of 14 acres for every 1,000 residents. Using this metric, the total projected need of the parkland was 158 acres. The Comprehensive Plan anticipated a total planned system of 159-209 acres. This assumed 2-3 neighborhood parks (in addition to Wildflower Park) with the Town Center park specifically identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan also anticipated 1-2 new community parks by 2040 in addition to City Park and the Memorial Garden at City Hall. Page 3 of 11 Are we planning to acquire any further parkland? The Parks and Trails map within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows several search areas for potential park locations. At the same time, we have enough parkland to serve a population level of roughly 11,300 based on the metrics outlined in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The various search areas on the map for parks is meant to provide options and general locations where it may make sense to locate park. It does not necessarily mean it is expected all search areas will have a park. Staff continues to feel strongly that at least 1 more neighborhood park will be needed when the Town Center develops further, regardless of the population level. This park is seen as crucial to serve the high density anticipated in the Town Center as well as serve as a social and recreational space for community engagement at the heart of the downtown area. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan anticipates the size of this park would be 4-5 acres. Additionally, the linear park corridor will continue to be acquired as the Town Center and Southeast District area continues to develop. It may also make sense to consider additional parks in the future as population levels continue to increase to the threshold where additional parks are needed or to provide parks outside of the MUSA. What is a neighborhood park? Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, a neighborhood park is the most local unit of the park system and prioritize user groups living in the immediate neighborhood. These parks are expected to provide recreational activities such as field games, court games, playground, skating, and neighborhood centers. Their design can be as simple as a playground or as intense as a public square. They are generally between 5-20 acres in size and serve an area within a ¼ to ½ mile from the park. Neighborhood parks should be located in close proximity to residential neighborhoods and are suited for areas with a relatively higher density, such as within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) rather than rural areas. It is expected that 1 neighborhood park is needed to serve every 5,000 residents. The 2022 park dedication formula assumed the City will develop 3 new neighborhood parks in addition to Wildflower Park. This includes the land acquired with Tavera and Bellwether. The third neighborhood park was earmarked for acquisition with the development of the Town Center. More neighborhood park search areas are shown on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan than the three included in the 2022 update. How much does a neighborhood park cost? In 2022, the park dedication formula assumed that each neighborhood park would cost $778,094. The estimate includes parking, lighting, utilities, picnic shelter, benches, a playground, a play court, and a special amenity (e.g., mini splash pad), and a design fee. Page 4 of 11 What is a community park? A community park has a larger overall size of 20-100 acres and serves a wider user group than neighborhood parks. These parks aim to preserve unique landscapes and natural areas and can accommodate passive and active recreation within the same park without conflict. The general rule of thumb is there should be 1 community park per 15,000 residents. At the time of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the City anticipated two types of community parks to serve the community: community playfield and open space/natural parks. City Park is considered a community playfield. No further community play fields are anticipated even though multiple Athletic Search Areas (ASAs) are shown on the Parks and Trails map. Open space/natural parks are characterized by high-quality natural resources that merit preservation. Recreational uses are secondary to the preservation of the natural open space and conservation function of these areas. Compatible recreational uses include hiking, picnicking, and nature study. The City currently has three open space/natural park areas – land acquired with the development of Ravinia, Bellwether, and Cook Lake Highlands. The 2022 park dedication formula assumed the following as it relates to community parks: 1. The City will develop 8 new community parks within the MUSA to include: o 4 general community parks that would need to be obtained. o 1 athletic complex. o 3 open space parks. 2. The City will develop 2 open space community parks outside of the MUSA. o These have not been obtained yet. How much does a community park cost? In the 2022 park dedication formula, three types of community parks were called out with the following cost estimates: 1. A general community park a. Estimated cost of $1,815,000 for each. b. The estimated cost included parking, lighting, utilities, picnic shelter, benches, trails, a large playground, restroom building, and a special amenity such as a hockey rink/performance area, and design fee. 2. Athletic complex a. This is where the update to the City Park was earmarked. b. Estimated cost in 2022 was $7,642,884. Page 5 of 11 c. The estimated cost included 3 full size soccer fields, 4 adult softball fields, youth playfields, tennis court, parking, lighting, fencing, utilities/irrigation, trails, picnic shelter, restrooms, concessions, and a design fee. 3. Open Space Park a. Estimated cost to develop each open space park within the MUSA was $1,194,190 in 2022. b. Estimated cost to develop two open space parks outside of the MUSA was $48,400. c. The estimated cost included trails, signage, parking, and natural resource enhancement. Are trails a part of the park dedication formula? Yes, trails are a significant portion of the park dedication formula as they can cost just as much as roads to construct. The cost of trails is projected to cost nearly triple the cost to develop the anticipated parks earmarked in the 2022 update. The City will develop roughly 608,350 linear feet of trails at an assumed cost of $89 per linear foot as follows: 1. MUSA on-road trail estimated at 157,093 linear feet. 2. MUSA off-road trail estimated at 144,800 linear feet. 3. Rural on-road trail estimated at 184,339 linear feet. 4. Rural off-road trail estimated at 122,109 linear feet. 5. 5 road crossings were included in the calculation (4 within the MUSA and 1 within the rural area) at $41,000 each. What is a linear park? The 2040 Comprehensive Plan explains a linear park is a planned trail corridor that provides varying modes of recreational travel, such as hiking and biking, to link components of the local recreational system with other facilities, such as commercial destinations. The Southeast District Plan locates the linear park on the east side of County Road 116 providing a trail corridor from Larkin Road to City Hall through the planned downtown mixed-use neighborhood. The City has obtained two parcels for the linear Figure 1 Southeast District Parks Plan Page 6 of 11 park, one dedicated as part of St. Therese just south of City Hall, and the other dedicated as part of the new Wright Hennepin Substation at the corner of Larkin Road and County Road 116. How much does a linear park cost? It is unclear what was assumed in the 2016 and 2022 park dedication calculations other than it appears to have been included as part of the calculation for trails. In the 2022 update, it would be assumed the trail in the linear park is roughly $89 per linear foot to construct. However, this assumption does not include additional amenities that may be desired since the linear park will have a larger corridor than typical off-road trails (100 feet instead of 20 feet). Staff believes the estimated cost of the linear park should be evaluated separately than other trails to include natural resource enhancements and benches or shade structures. How much will the total Parks and Trails System cost? Under the assumptions made in the 2022 update, the Parks and Trails System was projected to cost $82,940,594. Staff believes this number needs to be revised which is discussed further later in this report (see “Why does the park dedication formula need to be updated?”). How much is available in the park dedication fund today? As of January 2025, a total of $5,301,533.18 is available in the park dedication fund. Some considerations to keep in mind: 1. There are ongoing invoices being processed from this fund as part of the ongoing City Park Remaster planning efforts. 2. Additionally, staff believes there will be incoming requests from developers to receive reimbursement for paving trails. a. While some PUDs included paving trails as a public benefit, this is not true of every PUD, and the City moved away from considering this a public benefit in recent years. b. At this point, staff estimates roughly $500,000 needs to be kept on hand to be able to pay reimbursement requests. 3. At the same time, staff is also starting the reimbursement process with Three Rivers Park District for the City to be reimbursed for trails that will be included as part of the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. Why are we not able to develop all the parkland we own today? It is important to understand that the park dedication formula assumes full build out of the MUSA. Even with Corcoran’s consistent, if not explosive, rate of growth since the 2010s, it will take decades to fully accumulate the projected amount required to develop Page 7 of 11 the parks and trails system in its entirety. However, the City has moved forward with land acquisition as situations have presented themselves through subdivision applications. The City is expected to continue to grow, so the collection of park dedication is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Regardless, the City will not be able to fully develop all the parkland currently owned by the City all at once while having quality park and trail projects. It will be important to prioritize projects as park dedication and other fundings sources become available. In order to help with prioritization of future projects, a more in-depth Park System Master Plan (as compared to the detail provided within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan) is highly recommended. This new development dedicated parkland and paid park dedication fees. Why were the park dedication fees collected not enough to improve the parkland? Cash is only accepted in lieu of land when the City makes a determination that land is not needed. There are many developments that don’t include off-road trails or parks, and their entire dedication is satisfied with cash-in-lieu. When the City takes land to satisfy the Parks and Trails plan shown in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the cash requirement is reduced by an equivalent amount. For example, if a development meets 50% of the land dedication requirement as outlined in the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, then the required cash contribution will be decreased by 50% as well. This means it is not always possible for a development that dedicated parkland to also pay enough park dedication fees to fully finance the park improvements for said parkland, particularly in low-density residential developments. Most likely, park dedication fees collected from other developments will be required. How do other cities fund the development of parks and trails? Fast developing cities typically fund park development using the following strategies: 1. Develop parks as funding is secured through park dedication, grants, donations, etc. a. The benefit of this approach is it minimizes the need to use tax dollars to develop parkland and trails. b. The downside of this approach is the City may collect parkland that cannot be developed right away which may not meet the expectations of residents. c. Additionally, waiting can lead to a loss of spending power once the cost of inflation is considered (e.g., a dollar collected in 2022 is not worth as much in 2025, the estimated costs for project improvements can increase, etc.) 2. Develop parks utilizing bonds or the general levy where there is a gap and pay this back as park dedication is collected. a. The benefit of this approach is that parkland and trails can be developed sooner to provide residents with increased services and quality of life. Page 8 of 11 i. With costs and inflation, this approach arguably allows cities to get the most use out of each dollar earmarked for park dedication because the dollars are collected and spent in a short period of time. b. The downside of this approach is that it can rely on tax dollars to fund the gap between cash in hand earmarked for parks and trails and the overall project budget. 3. Another option that may be worthwhile to discuss further and keep in mind going forward is developers can be responsible for the development of parkland they are dedicating to the City. a. This would likely have to be a negotiation with a developer as part of a plat or Planned Unit Development. b. Park dedications would be waived under the theory those dollars are being used to build the park. c. It should be noted, the strategy adopted by the City up to this point intentionally avoided developers designing and constructing the parks. d. The benefit of this approach is that the parks can theoretically be available to residents much sooner than what may otherwise be feasible through the City. e. The downside of this approach is that the City would give up a degree of control in the design and construction process. However, the design could be a partnership with the City and the developer to ensure that City expectations are met. f. Additionally, this does not help us with the parkland already obtained but could be discussed as a philosophy change going forward. Will more park dedication fees be collected? Yes. The City anticipates roughly $1,000,000 to come in during 2025 for park dedication funds based on the preliminary and final plats approved in 2024. This does not include potential park dedication fees for incoming development applications, including a preliminary plat application for 104 homes that is anticipated to be reviewed in March. Additionally, this does not include the remaining estimated park dedication amount of over $2,500,000 from future phases of Hope Community since the timing of each phase is unclear, but another phase for the remaining single-family homes on the site is anticipated in 2025. How does the City Park Remaster factor into this? Since the adoption of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the desire to move forward with improving the amenities at City Park was identified and affirmed multiple times as the current priority. The anticipated improvements to City Park arguably will have the most impact to the most residents within the community for a number of reasons, including that City Park is where recreational programming is held. The assumed budget for City Page 9 of 11 Park improvements (based on generalizations and assumptions) within the park dedication formula was over $7 million in 2022. This estimate was not factoring in a splashpad or park building to be made available for community gatherings, both of which were identified as desirable amenities by the community. Why does the park dedication formula need to be updated? Staff believes it is important to prioritize updating the park dedication fee as soon as possible to address the following items: 1. It is important that the City regularly review and update the park dedication requirements and fees to account for changes in costs and inflation from year-to- year to make sure we are collecting the funds that can support the desired end goal of the system. For example, $1.00 in 2022 is believed to now be between $1.06 and $1.08 in 2025. So, the $778,094 earmarked for a neighborhood park project in the 2022 formula, could now be more like $827,400. It isn’t quite as simple as plugging in the 2022 estimate into a calculator to account for inflation, as some prices are affected more than others. Staff will need to research general cost assumptions to determine a new estimate. Additionally, it is important the park dedication formula is based on the valuation and fair market value of land to be compliant with state law. Staff is working with the Hennepin County Assessor to understand how land valuations may have changed since the 2022 update. 2. Second, it is unclear what was assumed and earmarked for the linear park that is called out in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the Southeast District Plan. Land has already been obtained with the new Wright Hennepin Substation and St. Therese for the linear park. Staff needs to go through the exercise to confirm the costs of the trail, natural resource enhancements, and amenities such as benches and/or shade structures are factored into the park dedication calculation. 3. The residential unit park dedication fee is based on the per capita obligation for the overall system. The formula, since at least 2016, is based on a full build-out scenario within the MUSA. This is not necessarily an error, but then projected cost of the planned park system should also be based on a full build-out of the park system. In other words, it is inconsistent that only 3 neighborhood parks were included in the 2022 update. At a minimum population of 37,000 at full-build out, there would be a need for a total of 7-8 neighborhood parks. The Comprehensive Plan shows search areas for 7 neighborhood parks in addition to Wildflower Park. This should be revised. 4. In 2022, both on-road and off-road trails are assumed to cost $89 a linear foot. However, the 2016 formula assumed on-road trails were not as expensive as off- Page 10 of 11 road trails. Staff is reaching out to other cities to understand what they assume for the costs for both types of trails. 5. The costs of the open space parks should be evaluated further. Some amenities included, such as the size of the parking lot, may be overestimated. Additionally, it is unclear how the rural open space parks are significantly less expensive than the MUSA open space parks. 4. Discussion Points The following items are questions and comments regarding the assumptions used to project the total cost of the park system and particular park projects. A final answer is not necessarily needed at this time, as a master park plan could further flesh out some of these details as well. However, without clear direction provided at this time, the park dedication formula will carry forward some or all of the assumptions previously relied on when determining whether the fee needs to be increased and to what extent. 1. Confirm staff should move forward and prioritize review of the park dedication formula and fee. 2. Do neighborhood parks need to have a special amenity in addition to a playground and sport court? a. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan does not mention a special amenity such as a mini splash-pad in these parks as assumed in the park dedication formula. 3. We seem to have too many community parks in the current park dedication calculation. The City currently has 4. Based on population, a population of 37,000 assumed at full buildout of the MUSA would only need 4. However, based on the land size of the City it may still make sense to have 1-2 community parks in the rural area of the City (since we already have 4 located within the MUSA). That would still reduce the number of new community parks to develop down to 6 Figure 2 Open Space Park (Cook Lake Highlands) Page 11 of 11 instead of 8. Are we comfortable removing some of these parks from the park dedication calculation? 4. Is there any intention to develop the open space at Cook Lake Highlands? Could this be as simple as paving the trail between Fairway Shores to the north (once constructed) and Bass Lake Crossing to the west? 5. Discussion is also anticipated on how this affects the City Park plan. Item 7c. on this meeting agenda is an update on the design documents for City Park that includes different scenarios at different price points. In-depth discussion related to City Park is likely best to be had as part of Item 7c. a. A question that does need to be answered tonight is whether the Council feels the existing park dedication funds need to be earmarked for one or both of the neighborhood parks near Tavera and Bellwether now, or whether this can wait for incoming park dedication dollars? 6. What questions about the parks and trails system and park dedication remain? ATTACHMENTS 1. Parks and Trails Chapter from 2040 Comprehensive Plan 2. Projected Incoming Park Dedication Fees ͷǣ APPLICATION 71 GOALS AND POLICIES 71 AREAS OUTSIDE THE 2040 METROPOLITAN URBAN 72 SERVICE AREA (MUSA) BOUNDARY GUIDELINES 72 PARK CLASSIFICATIONS 72 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 72 COMMUNITY PARK 73 LOCAL LINEAR PARKS, TRAILS, CORRIDORS 73 AND PARKWAYS EXISTING CITY PARKS 73 PRIVATE PARK 74 PARKS AND T RAILS LOCATIONS 74 FUTURE PARKS 74 DEMOGRAPHICS/COMMUNITY GROWTH 74 LOCAL T RENDS 74 FUTURE PROJECTIONS BY T YPE 74 FUTURE T RAILS 75 FIGURES 5-1 2040 MUSA INSIDE BOUNDARIES 71 5-2 2040 MUSA OUTSIDE BOUNDARIES 72 5-3 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK 73 5-4 CORCORAN CITY HALL AND MEMORIAL PARK 73 5-5 RAVINIA NEIGHBHORD PARK 74 5-6 CORCORAN COMMUNITY ATHLETIC AREA 74 5-7 CORCORAN LION’S PARK 74 5-8 THRU 5-11 PARK T RAIL EXAMPLES 75 5-12 REGIONAL BICYCLE T RANSPORTATION 76 NETWORK 5-13 REGIONAL T RAIL SEARCH AREA 76 FIGURES CONTINUED 5-14 DIAMOND LAKE RT MAP 76 5-15 COUNTY BIKEWAY SYSTEM 76 5-16 CONCEPTUAL REGIONAL T RAIL SYSTEM 76 TABLES 5-1 PROJECTED ACRES OF PARK LAND 75 5-2 CITY AND COUNTY T RAIL SYSTEM 75 MAPS 5-1 PARKS AND T RAILS PLAN 79 69 70 Corcoran’s parks, trails and open space system will be an integral part of the community’s life. The system will provide recreational opportunities for park system patrons, while preserving existing natural and historic resources. The parks and trails system should be authentic to the identity of the City and unify neighborhoods to reinforce a sense of community pride. This plan to develop, maintain and grow the park and trail system provides a benchmark from which to make decisions as investment opportunities arise. Goals provide decision-making guidance to the City. Policies provide actionable steps the Parks and Trails Commission and policymakers can take to ensure stewardship of financial, natural, and recreational resources and create a parks and trail system that is representative of the community’s values. Diligent planning will result in: • A system where making healthy lifestyle choices is integral to daily life. • A system with quality resources and facilities that attract new development, businesses, and visitors. • A venue for strengthening community engagement by giving visitors places to gather and interact. • A community where key natural resources are protected before development occurs. • A City that is known for promoting a high quality of life. APPLICATION This Plan places emphasis on park and trail development within the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA) as new development occurs. While park and trail locations are also identified in areas outside the MUSA, plans and proposed corridors are for guidance purposes and will be implemented over the long term as development occurs and opportunities to work with landowners arise. The Parks and Trails Plan uses the City’s 2003 Natural Resource Inventory as a foundation for the park and trail system to be developed in Corcoran over the next 20 years. The plan incorporates national trends and standards as available from the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA). NRPA publishes standards to help communities in planning, acquisition and development of park and open space. In more recent years, the NRPA is encouraging communities to benchmark their metrics and enter the data into their national database. Due to the limited number of communities participating in their benchmarking program at the time of this report, it is unclear how Corcoran’s parks services compare to other communities of comparable size in Minnesota. The standards that the NRPA has used in the past provides guidance for how to place parks by park type and the general facilities you might see in each park. Figure 5-1: 2040 MUSA Inside Boundaries The area within the 2040 MUSA is the emphasis for new park and trail development. GOALS AND POLICIES Goal 1: To implement this Parks and Trails Plan based on the needs of Corcoran residents and park system patrons. Policy 1: Apply this plan when making recommendations to City Council. Policy 2: Inform and seek input from other City advisory commissions on any issues or improvements that may be applicable to that commission. Policy 3: Respond to the increasing maintenance, planning, and recreational demands made by the City and its park system patrons. Policy 4: Track changes to the park and trail system to ensure a well- considered network. Goal 2: To work cooperatively with neighboring communities, Hennepin County, the State of Minnesota and others in planning, developing, and financing the local park system. Policy 1:Seek compatibility with adjacent local community plans and metropolitan, State and Federal plans and programs. Policy 2: Seek cooperation, coordination and participation with local school districts in planning the joint use, development, and operation of the park and trail system. Policy 3: Encourage community volunteer organizations to participate in park and trail development. Policy 4: Require park dedication from all developers (commercial, industrial and residential) in the form of cash or land, according to the Park Dedication Ordinance and the fee schedule set by the City Council. All cash will be directed to the Park Fund and will be used for park land acquisition and development projects. Policy 5: Review the park dedication formula on an annual basis to ensure it supports the needs of the park system and is comparable with area metropolitan communities. Policy 6: Acquire park land when possible, in accordance with the City’s Parks and Trails Plan to minimize costs and potential conflicts. Goal 3: To develop a park system the public values and visits. Policy 1: Design and build parks and trails early in the development process, so that they are available to new park system patrons. Policy 2: Include private parks, when planned and funded by developers, as a neighborhood feature based on the provisions of the City’s Park Dedication Ordinance. Policy 3: Maintain an equitable distribution of parks throughout the community. Policy 4: Develop a parks and trails system that is safe, enjoyable, and accessible. Policy 5: Provide multi-use and multi-seasonal programs and activities. Policy 6: Provide park system patrons with timely information regarding park and trail facilities and programs. Policy 7: Establish design standards that create unity within the park and trail system and that emphasize the character of the City, its history, and landscape. Policy 8: Park design should incorporate a general theme, but also allow diversity among parks to adapt to natural features, local history, or neighborhood character and needs. Within 2040 Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA), and within the City of Corcoran Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers % Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Oakdale Dr B r id l e Path J e f f r e y Ln Abilene Ln Tr a i l L n HuntersRdg County Road 30 Heat her Ln Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd County Roa d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n H o r s e s h o e Bend Dr Cou n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 ESt Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r ElmSt Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d County Road 1 1 7 Stieg R d Be c h t o l d R d Ka l k R d Schutte Rd Meister Rd F ox Va lle y Dr M y s t i q u e Dr Hage Dr 93rd Ave N Schutte P l Br a nd y w in e Rd ChisholmT r l Tessmer Rd HighBlu ffLn WinchesterTrl JubertLn R u s h C r e e k RushCreek CountyDitc h N u m b e r S i x t e e n Cou n t y Ditch N u mberThree SouthFork Ru s h C r eek NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP %%%%% TrailheadTrailhead Scotttt Lakeakekeke JubertJubert Lake 444444444444444444444447444444444444444444444444444444410104510510461061045610561044444104510461045610444441045104610456104 4444444444444444444444744444444444444444444444444450504550550465065045650565044444504550465045650444445045504650456504 444444444444444444444444477444444444444444444444444444444444441919451951946196194561956194444419451946194561944444191945195194619619456195619444441945194619456194 44444444444444444444447444444444444444444444303045305304630630456305630444443045304630456304 ad 1 1 oa d 1 1 6 oa d 1 1 6 y R o a d y R o a y R o a d 1 1 6 11 616 y R o a d 1 1 6 Dr Drle Dre Dre Drdale Ddale Ddale ale DakdalakdalekdaleOakdOakOakdOakOakdOakdOakdale DOaakdaakdale Drle DrOakdaOOakdale Dr JJee fffff ffrree yy LLnn unty Road 30unty Road 30County County 30 30oadCounty Road CoC 30 30County Road 30 HHHHHeeeaatttthhhhheerrr LLLnnn Pio n e e r T r l Pio n e e Pio n e e r T ne e r T r l Pio n e e r ne e r T r ion e e r Pio n e e r Pio n e Pio n e Pio n e Pio n Pio n e e r T r l TTTTTrrraaail HHHHHaavvvvvveeenn RRRRRRRdddRRRdR unty Roanty Rounty RCounty ounty CountCouty Roaty Roaty Roty Ro CouCouCoCoCounty R o a HorseshrseshHorsesHoreshoe Thoe Treshoe e TrlHoHoe TrlHorseshoe Trl CoCoCoCoCoCoCoCCoCouuunnn tt yyyyy RRRRRRRoooRoR aaa ddddd 555 00000 Larsen RdLarsen Rd Wi l l o w D r WiWi l l Wi l l o w il l o w D w D r Wi l l o w D r Co u n t y Co u n t y CoCo u R o a d 1 9 un t y R o a oa d 1 9 un t y R o R o a d y R o a R o a d y R o a d R o a R o a Ro a d Ro a d oa d oa d 1 9 1 9 1 9 Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead TrlHomestead Trl CaCCaCa i CaCa i Ca i n Ca i n Ca i n Ca i n R ai n R Ca i n Ca i n R Ca i n in R d in R d in R d in R d in R d in R d n R d R d Ca i n R d ls R d Ro l l i n g H i l ls R Ro il l s R il l s R d il l s R il l s R g H i l l s li n g H i ol l i n g Ro l l i n Ro l l RoRoRo l Ro l l ll i n g H i l g H i ls ls R d ls R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d SSuu nndd aa nn cc eeeee RRddRRdR Fo x l i n ox l i n e D r Fo x l i n e D r ehler Rdehlerhler Rrehler trehletrehletrehleStrehStrehStrehStreStrStrr Rdr RdStrehler StStrehler Rdr Rder Rder RdStrSStrehler Rd 5 tt hh PPl NNN OOOOldddd SSSSSSSeeeettttttttleerrrsssrrsr RRRRR dddd RR d R CCoouunnttyy RRoadoad 1111777 BeBeBeBe c Be c Be c h Be c Be c h Be c h Be c h ec h t ec h t ec h t o ec h t o ec h t o ec h t o ch t o l ch t o l d ch t o l d to l d to l d to l d to l d ol d R ol d R ld R d ld R d ld R d d R d ld R d R d Be c h t o l d R d Ka l k Ka l k Ka l k R Ka l k R lk R d lk R d lk R d lk R d k R d lk R d Ka l k R d r Rdr Rdr Rdister Rister ister ter Risterer Rdister Rd FF ooxx VVaaVVaV lleeyy DDrr HHHHHaaggee DDrr 9393939393rd 93rd 93rd 93rd 93rd 3rd Av3rd Av3rd Avrd Avrd Avd Ave Nd Ave Nd Av Ave Nve N Ave Ave ve Nve N3rd 9393r93rrd Av93e Ne Ne N9393rd Ave N CChhisssshhoolmmTT rr l Tessmer RdTessmer Rd HHigghhBBlulu ffffLLnn WWinncchheesstteerrrTTrrl JJJJuuubbbeeeerrtttrrtr LLLnnn RRR uuuR sss hhhsshhss CCC rrCC eeerrer ee kk Rusussuhshhs CrCrrCeereereeekk ttyytt DiDiiDtctcct hchhc N uNuuN m bb eeee rr SoSooSuththhtFoFrkrkkr Ru su h ASA ASA ASA ASAASASA OSP OSP OSP OSPPOSPOS OSPSP OSP SchuSchuSchuttchutthutte Rhutte RSchuttSchuttSchute Rdte Rdhuttehuttehutte hutte utte Rdte Rde Rde Rdte RdhuttehutteSchutte Rd NP Outside 2040 Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA), but within the City of Corcoran MUSA line MUSA lineMUSA line MU S A l i n e 71 Goal 4: To develop a system of parks and trails, with a variety of active and passive uses, that reflect the special character of the City, its history, and natural resources. Policy 1: Select land for parks, trails or open space based on: a. Its designation as a park or trail search area in the Parks and Trails Plan; b. Its scenic or unique natural features; c. Its ability to support desirable wildlife populations; d. Its performance of important environmental functions; e. Its proximity to the Natural Resource Corridors identified in the Natural Resource Inventory; f. Its qualities conducive to recreational development; g. A demonstrated need for additional parkland exists in an area. Policy 2: Ensure park names reflect location by incorporating local historical names or features, a local access road, neighborhood name, benefactors, or prominent natural features of the area. Policy 3: Develop a consistent signage policy for parks system, including directional and informational signs. Policy 4: Preserve outstanding natural areas by discouraging development of prominent or highest quality landscape features and conserving natural resource areas. Protect wetlands and woodlands from undesirable impacts and fragmentation. Restore them to a high-quality condition when possible. Goal 5: To provide a safe, equitable, and convenient trail network. Policy 1: Apply this plan to coordinate development of the trail system. Policy 2: Connect future trails to existing and adjacent community trails. Policy 3: Encourage the use of utility easements and transportation right-of- ways for on-road route development. Policy 4: Respect individual property rights. Trail development and routing should be a cooperative effort between the City and the landowners along the proposed route. Existing neighborhoods are encouraged to request trails and work with the City to identify their routes. Policy 5: Require a 20-foot minimum trail easement to provide adequate bicycle and pedestrian circulation or access to schools, parks, downtown, churches, or other facilities. Policy 6: Implement safe pedestrian crossing facilities on main roadways. Policy 7: Maximize user safety by thoroughly considering conflicts between trail user groups, for example snowmobiles and equestrians. Policy 8: Continue to show snowmobile trails on the City Parks and Trails Plan. Snowmobiles are an important recreational activity for many residents. A private organization maintains the current trail system. While the City does not own or maintain these trails, the City will make applicants aware of the desire to maintain routes through the City as development occurs. AREAS OUTSIDE THE 2040 METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE AREA (MUSA) BOUNDARIES GUIDELINES The following guidelines will be applied to development proposals outside the 2040 MUSA boundary: • Park and trail policies in areas outside the 2040 MUSA boundary will be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Subdivision Ordinances. • Relevant development proposals will be presented to the Parks and Trails Commission before City Council approval, thereby allowing for review and recommendations regarding incorporation of trail easements, open space acquisition or park facilities. • Park facilities generally should not be planned outside the 2040 MUSA, except for: • Trails that have been identified on the Natural Resource Inventory or the Parks and Trails Plan maps. • Parks that have been identified on the Parks and Trail System map. • Protection of significant natural areas that have been identified on the Natural Resource Inventory. • Athletic facilities may be considered, but are preferred in areas closest to the 2040 MUSA. • Proposed parks and trails shown on the Parks and Trails System Map outside the 2040 MUSA areas are for guidance purposes and will be implemented over the long term as a part of new development through development dedication or cooperative purchase. Figure 5-2: 2040 MUSA Outside Boundaries The guidelines above apply to the area outside the 2040 MUSA. PARK CLASSIFICATION Parks are divided into 1 of 3 categories: Neighborhood Park, Community Park and Linear Park. Parks may serve more than 1 purpose, for example a community park may also serve the immediate neighborhood park needs in addition to a more regional community park demand. The following park types and standards will be developed in Corcoran. NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Neighborhood Parks are the most local unit of the park system, providing area for recreational activities such as field games, court games, playground, skating, and neighborhood centers. These parks prioritize user groups living in the neighborhood. They are identified as NP – Neighborhood Park on the system map. Neighborhood park sites should be in proximity to residential neighborhoods. Their design may be as simple as a playground or as intense as a public square. Siting neighborhood parks adjacent to community parks and local linear parks, corridors and parkways will expand the function of all types of open space. It will also entice residents from throughout the community to visit the park ensuring new parks do not function as private facilities for new developments. Neighborhood park development criteria generally includes: • An overall size of 5-20 acres. • A service area of 1/4 to 1/2 mile. • A physical geography suited for intense development. • A frequency of 1 neighborhood park per 5,000 residents. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers % Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Oakdale Dr Bridl e Path Je f f rey Ln Abilene Ln Tr a i l L n Hunters Rdg County Road 30 Heat her Ln Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd County R o a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n H o r s e s h o e Bend D r Coun t y Ro a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 ES t Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d S un da nc e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r ElmSt Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Cain Pl 65 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d County Road 11 7 Stie g R d Be c h t o l d R d Ka l k R d Schutte Rd Meister Rd F ox Va lley Dr M y s t i q u e Dr Hage Dr 93rd Ave N Schutte P l Br and y w ine Rd ChisholmT r l Tessmer Rd HighBlu ffLn WinchesterTrl JubertLn R u s h C r e e k RushCreek CountyDitc h N u m b e r S i x t e e n Co u n t y Ditch N u mber Three SouthFork Ru s h C reek NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP MorinrinMoriMo LakeLake L CookCoCo LakeLaL Co u n t y Co u CoCo u n ou n t y CoCo u n t y Co u un t y R ad 1 1 6 ty R o a d 1 nt y R o ty R o a Ro a d 1 ad 1 1 6 1 1 6 ty R o ty R o Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 BBrriddl ee PPaatthh AAbbileennee LLnn Tr a i l L n Tr a i Tr a i l Tr a i Tr a i l L n HHHHuunntttteerrrrsssssrrsr RRRdddRRRdRggg er T r l er T r l ee r T r l ee r T r l Pio n e e r T r l Pio n e e ne e r T r l ee r T r l er T r l on e e r T r ion e e r T Pio n e e r Pio n e e r Pio n e e Pio n e Pio n Pio n e e r T r l y Road 10d 10oad 10 10d 10oadoad 1 10y Roady Roay Road 10oad 1y Road y Roay Road 10 HoHoHorHorHorseHorseorsesorseHorseshsesheshoe Trhoe Treshoeshoe shoee Trle TrlorsesrseshshoeHororseHorseshoe Trl Ro b Ro b RoRo b Ro b e r t Ro b e r t Ro b e r Ro b e r t be r t ob e r t be r t be r t er t L n er t L n rt L n rt L n t L n t L n Ro b e r t L n HH oo rr ss ee ss hh oo ee BBBeenndd DD rr GGGGleeaassoooonnn PPPP kk ww yyy HHuunntttteerr RRddRRdR EESS tt il l R d Ma p l e H i l l R Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d RoRo l l Ro l l Ro l l CCoouunnttrrryyyyy RRdd MoMoMoMoMo h a Mo h Mo h Mo h Mo h Mo h Mo h a Mo h a Mo h a w k oh a w ha w k oh a w oh a w oh a w ha w ha w k ha w k aw k D wk D k D r k D r k D r k D r k D r k D r D r D r Mo h a w k D r EElmmSStt in Rdn Rdin Rdin Rdrkin Rkin Rrkin Larkin LarkLarkLarkLaLarkarkinarkinLarLar Rd Rdin RdarkinarkinLarkin Rd CCaiainn PPl 6655 tt hh PPl NNN Dassel LnDassel Ln Stie g R d g R d Stie g Stie g R d ieg R d g R d g R d g R d g R d eg R d ieg R d ieg R d Stie g R Stie g Stie g StieStieStie g Stie g R d SchScSchSchScScSSch ister Rdister isterMeisteMeistMeisteMeisMeisMeiMeiMeisMeMeMeisMeisMeiseisteeisteeisteeisteMeMeeisteeisteMeister Rd MMMM yyyyy sss tttt i qqqq uu ee DDrr SScchhuuttttee PP l BrBrBr aaand y w yw nd y w nd y w dy w nd y w nd y w ndnd y nd y nd y nd y w inenenenene RRRddddd Coounn rrrr S i xixxi txttx e e n CCoCooC u o uu o n t y t DiDtcthc N uNuuN mu ber ThThhT reee s hshhs C rereerek NPNPNP NPNP NP NPNP NPNPNP NPNPNP ASA OSPOSPOSOSP OSP OSP OSP OSPOSP Within 2040 Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA), and within the City of Corcoran MUSA line MU S A l i n e MUSA line MUSA line 72 COMMUNITY PARK Community parks serve a wider user group than neighborhood parks, and are often in proximity to secondary schools and other public facilities. These parks seek to preserve unique landscapes and natural areas, and as they have a larger overall size, the programming of passive and active recreation may occur within the same park without conflict. Community park development criteria generally includes: • An overall size of 20-100 acres. • A service area of up to a 2-mile radius. • A frequency of 1 community park per 15,000 residents. In addition to the existing Corcoran Community Park at County Road 10 and 50, there are 2 other types of planned parks that will serve the wider community and fall into this category: Community Playfields and Open Space/Natural Parks. COMMUNITY PLAYFIELD Community playfields, identified as ASA-Athletic Search Area on the system map, are areas for intense recreational facilities such as athletic fields and swimming pools. Playfields should be integrated into community parks or may be co-located with school athletic facilities. They may also include a neighborhood park use. OPEN SPACE /NATURAL PARKS These parks are characterized by high-quality natural resources that merit preservation and which would be negatively affected by development. They are identified as Open Space and Preservation/Nature Park on the system map. Recreational uses are secondary to the preservation of natural open space and the conservation functions of these areas. Compatible recreational uses include hiking, picnicking and nature study. Open space or natural park sites are typically within the high-quality natural community areas identified in the City’s Natural Resource Inventory. They should be connected by trails to the City’s Natural Resource Corridors and to other parks and will be left in a natural or semi-natural state, with minimal development. LOCAL LINEAR PARKS, T RAILS, C ORRIDORS AND PARKWAYS These areas are developed for 1 or more varying modes of recreational travel such as hiking, biking, and cross-country skiing. These features may traverse 1 or more municipality with width and length minimums varying by feature type – depending on their location within or outside right-of-way. Linear parks and trail corridors are often found adjacent to major roadways within the County or other locations where needed to link cities to components of the local or regional recreation system or community facilities such as schools, libraries, or commercial destinations. These parks may also be located in planned greenway corridors or adjacent to creeks and stream corridors to provide public access to natural features, however such development should consider site and habitat impacts. EXISTING CITY PARKS (City of Corcoran owns 3 parks) The Corcoran Community Park is located at the intersection of County Roads 10 and 50. The original park was approximately 16 acres. The City purchased a 60-acre parcel from Rockford Area Schools in 2018. The 60-acre parcel is located directly west of the original park and brings the total park area to approximately 76 acres. Park facilities include a playground, tennis and volleyball courts, softball fields, ice rinks, parking and a picnic shelter. The 60-acre parcel adds additional multi-use fields and parking to the Community Park. Figure 5-3: Corcoran Community Park The City has also begun developing park land on City Hall property. The site, including the Memorial Garden, is an estimated 8 acres. Once fully developed, this park will consist of picnic facilities and trails. Figure 5-4: Corcoran City Hall and Memorial Park Corcoran Community Park - Playground - Courts (Tennis and Volleyball) - Ballfields - Ice rinks - Parking - Picnic Shelter Rockford School Property - Multi-Use Fields - Parking Parcel extents for illustrative purposes only Parcel extents for illustrative purposes only 73 EXISTING CITY PARKS CONTINUED Wildflower Park has been dedicated as part of the Ravinia development and is owned by the City. A plan for development was approved and the park construction began in 2018. Figure 5-5: Wildflower Park PRIVATE PARK The Corcoran Lions Club owns a multi-use facility at the intersection of County Roads 10 and 101. This is the site of the Hennepin County Fair, the Hamel Rodeo and a variety of other public entertainment events. While it is a privately owned and operated open space, the City’s Goals and Policies (see Goal 2) prioritize keep- ing open communication with such entities to ensure cooperation and thoughtful planning of the City’s parks and trails. Figure 5-6: Corcoran Lions Park PARKS AND TRAILS LOCATIONS Proposed parks are identified on the 2040 Parks and Trails System Map, Map 5-1. Athletic complex and open space search areas are shown on this plan to indicate potential site areas, not exact property locations. These search areas are distributed throughout the community to aid further investigation for costs, ease of obtaining land, access and proximity to future growth and development. Many of these parks will be developed as new residential neighborhoods are constructed, increasing the need for parks. The City will work with developers and other landowners to identify the exact location and size of parks and trail alignments as development or park acquisition is proposed. The City will seek to co-locate trails with other infrastructure easements where feasible. Map 5-1: Parks and Trails Plan (See page 79 for large size map.) FUTURE PARKS DEMOGRAPHICS/COMMUNITY GROWTH The 2040 Comprehensive Plan uses the population forecasts and the context presented to recommend the number and distribution of park and trail facilities in the community. The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) has provided standards in the past for how to place parks by park type, and the general facilities you might see in each park. The NRPA is moving away from the minimum standards of service, as findings indicate that each City has unique needs, and is encouraging communities to benchmark their metrics and enter their data into the national database. Therefore, if more parkland than the minimum standards is required to serve the population in each neighborhood, the City may acquire land to meet this need. LOCAL TRENDS In April 2017 the City surveyed residents regarding, “What amenities are important to you as a resident?” Key findings from 115 responses were used to guide the 2040 Parks and Trails plan, including the following: • Parks and trails within a mile of each Corcoran neighborhood was valued by 51 percent. • Green spaces (i.e. open space parks) were valued by 61 percent of respondents. The 2017 survey supports a trend in past community surveys (in 2008 and 2004) also indicating that the City should develop trails, parks, and green spaces for park system patrons. FUTURE PROJECTIONS BY TYPE According to NRPA standards, there should be 1 neighborhood park per 5,000 people within 1/4 to 1/2 mile of their home and 1 community park per 15,000 people within 2 miles of a residential neighborhood. As Corcoran is still developing, it is important to consider the proximity of new parks to new residential developments, and how the density of the development affects the size and quantity of park types. Applying only 1 standard of park need (for example overall population) would suggest Corcoran needs just 1 community park. However, considering just the land area of Corcoran within the 2040 MUSA suggests the community would need nearly 10 community parks. While the overall acreage of parkland planned for Corcoran exceeds the standards set by the NRPA, not all neighborhoods have neighborhood or community parks within the recommended service areas. As population increases in each neighborhood, the City should acquire parkland in those neighborhoods to serve populations within each neighborhood. Based on review of park development trends as indicated by NRPA, the City will have a projected need of 14 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. With this standard in mind, and considering the character and existing ecological assets within Corcoran, the following is the planned system to serve approximately 11,300 people in 2040: NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS The City has one neighborhood park, Wildflower Park in the Ravinia neighborhood. By 2040, the City will need approximately 2-3 additional neighborhood parks, totaling approximately 10-60 acres. Neighborhood parks should be located within ½ mile walking distance of significant neighborhood developments. • A new Town Square is planned in the downtown core, as part of the Corcoran Southeast District and Downtown Guidelines. The Town Square is categorized as a neighborhood park due to its scale and value to future downtown residents via programming. The Town Square is planned as a social center for the community, suitable for concerts and celebrations. It will be a public space to support the recreation in downtown. COMMUNITY PARKS In addition to the 2 existing community parks, the City will need 1 to 2 new community parks by 2040. These additional community parks would require approximately 20-200 new acres. • Community Playfields: With the additional 60-acre parcel purchase from the Rockford School District, the City does not have an immediate need for additional playfields by 2040. The City will continue to work with landowners to identify opportunities to acquire additional land for future community playfields. A 2006 TKDA Needs Analysis and Recommendations offers metro-area guidelines for population-driven facility types and this study will serve as a continuing resource in the search for and design of both an athletic complex and the other identified parks. • Open Space Parks: The City will consider adding approximately 60 acres of public open space. The space may be divided among 3 sites. LOCAL LINEAR PARKS, T RAILS, C ORRIDORS AND PARKWAYS See recommendations in Future Trails section that follows. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers % Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Oakdale Dr Br id le Path Je f frey Ln Abilene Ln Tr a i l L n HuntersRdg County Road 30 Heather Ln Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd County R o a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n H o r s e s h o e Bend D r Count y Ro ad 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 ES t Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Su nda nc e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r El mSt Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5th Pl N Dassel Ln Old Settlers R d County Road 117 Stie g R d Be c h t o l d R d Ka l k R d Schutte Rd Meister Rd Fox Valley Dr My s t iq u e Dr Hage Dr 93rd Ave N Schutte P l Br and y w ine Rd ChisholmTr l Tessmer Rd HighBlu ffL n WinchesterTrl JubertLn R u s h C re e k RushCreek CountyDitch Nu m b e r S i x t e e n Co u n t y Ditch N u mberThree SouthFork Ru sh C reek NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1 Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and Trails Regional Trail Existing On Road Trail City Park Trailhead Private Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and Trails Proposed On Road Trail Proposed Off Road Trail Proposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development Area Neighborhood Park Community Park Greenway Corridor Municipal Boundaries 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands NP 74 The projected 2040 parkland area need, based on the 2040 population forcast for Corcoran is 158 acres, with the total planned system range for projected parkland area 159 to 209 acres.The existing acreage of parks in Corcoran are on the low end of NRPA standards for neighborhood and community parks. The high end of the range is due to Corcoran’s abundance of naturally occurring ecological assets. These assets are in most cases prohibited from development by environmental protection regulations. These ecological assets also support the unique character of Corcoran, a priority the community has identified as important to preserve (Policy 4, Goal 1). The community has also consistently conveyed the importance of maintaining the community’s rural character. Open space is a key feature in rural character. Recreation trends and community preferences will ultimately affect the number, size, and location of specific parks and facilities. The system master plan shows a concentration of new neighborhood parks within future neighborhoods where a density of new housing will support the need and use of those parks. The City will continue to work closely with the local school districts in future planning of playfields, athletic complexes, and additional park facilities. FUTURE TRAILS Corcoran residents have expressed a strong interest in trails, particularly for walking and biking. The community also has a high level of interest in snowmobile and horseback trails. The community’s value of trails has been implemented into this plan. New to the 2040 Metropolitan Council Transportation Policy Plan, a Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) has been established. The RBTN seeks to integrate a seamless network of on road bikeways and off road trails to improve conditions for bicycle transportation at the regional level. Corcoran’s Trail System plan will consider connections to surrounding communities when planning on road bikeways and off road trails to support park system patrons interest in trails and the regional bicycle transportation network. TABLE 5-2: CITY AND COUNTY TRAIL SYSTEM W ITHIN CORCORAN Total Trail Miles in 2040 MUSA 58 All Types Total Trail Miles Outside 2040 MUSA 56 Total Off Road Miles 50 Inside & Outside MUSA Total On Road Miles 64 Total Trail System Miles 114 There are several categories of trails identified on the 2040 Parks and Trails Plan. The City of Corcoran is continuing to plan for a fully developed system ultimately offering up to 114 miles of trails. Trail categories and potential trail options are described in Figures 5-8 through 5-11: TABLE 5-1: PROJECTED ACRES OF PARK LAND Park Name / Type Existing Area (acres) New Proposed Area (acres) Neighborhood Parks 5.13 10-60 Wildflower Park 5.13 0 Town Center 0 4-5 Community Parks 84 60 City Hall Park/Memorial Garden 8 0 Community Playfields 76 0 Open Space Parks 0 60 Subtotal 89.13 70-120 Total Planned System 159-209 Total Projected Need by 2040 158 acres Figure 5-10: Sidwalk with Boulevard off Roadway Figure 5-11: On Road Trail on Roadway with Boulevard Figure 5-8: Off-Road Trail with 20’ Easement Figure 5-9: Off-Road Trail with Boulevard off Roadway 75 REGIONAL LINKING TRAIL Regional linking trails are located to serve as linkages between components of the regional parks system. When feasible, linking trails should attempt to connect the population, economic, and social centers along its route. Corcoran has 1 existing regional linking trail, the Lake Independence Regional Trail, located along County Road 19 that stretches from Baker Park Reserve to Crow-Hassan Park Reserve. The general alignment is shown on the map along County Road 19. The length of this trail through Corcoran is approximately 6 miles. This trail is considered a Tier 2 alignment in the RBTN network. A proposed regional trail (Rush Creek Regional Trail) is also planned just outside the northern edge of Corcoran providing a connection point from County Road 101 near 117 to Crow-Hassan Park Reserve. A second RBTN, Tier 2 trail is proposed for County Road 101 between Corcoran and Maple Grove. No other RBTN network connections are proposed in the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 TPP. REGIONAL TRAIL SEARCH CORRIDOR ADDITION Regional trail search corridors (RTSC) are proposed regional trails without a Metropolitan Council-approved master plan that identifies trail alignment. Because they do not have a Council-approved master plan, these corridors are not eligible for Regional Parks System funding for acquisition and development. Within Corcoran, a RTSC proposed by the Three River Park District was recommended as a system addition to the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan. This RTSC’s general alignment along County Road 116 is shown in Figure 5-13 as North-South 1. Figure 5-14 shows a refined version of the same RTSC identified as the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. This trail would connect several different existing and proposed regional trails and is the only RTSC in Corcoran. COUNTY TRAIL County trails, in this case proposed and managed by either Hennepin County as part of their regional bikeway system or Three Rivers Park District (TRPD) as part of their regional trail system, are often found adjacent to major roadways and locations needed to link cities and components of the local or regional recreation system and/or community facilities such as schools, libraries or commercial destinations. Three Rivers Park System has proposed a network of nearly 49 miles off road trails for Corcoran, generally aligning with Greenway Corridors. It should be noted that trail terminology varies from County to City. In this plan and in the City of Corcoran generally, terms of on road and off road trails are preferred. Hennepin County uses on street and off street terminology though they are functionally the same. ON ROAD TRAIL This trail type is a striped or signed bikeway on an existing road right-of-way or designated lane. The City has 1 4.5-mile on road trail along County Road 30 and 1 6-mile trail along County Road 116. By 2040, the City on road trail system is planned to include 31 miles; another 33 miles of on road trails are planned outside the MUSA. OFF ROAD TRAIL An off road-trail is a multi-use trail, paved or gravel that is at least 8 feet wide. These trails are designed for bicycle, pedestrian, and other non- motorized uses. The City and County agencies combined are planning for approximately 49 miles of off road trails, 26 miles inside the 2040 MUSA and 23 miles outside that area. The City is investigating the possibility of co-locating an off-road trail over the natural gas pipeline easement in the southern half of the City. Dayton Greenfield Hanover Independence Loretto PlymouthMedina Corcoran Maple Grove Rogers 94 55 HanoverSaint Michael ord Twp. Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) 012340.5 Miles City of Corcoran, Hennepin County Regional Trails (Parks Policy Plan) Existing Planned County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries NCompass Street Centerlines Open Water Features Existing State Trails (DNR) Mississippi River Trail RBTN Alignments Tier 1 Alignment Tier 2 Alignment RBTN Corridors (Alignments Undefined) Tier 2 Corridor Tier 1 Priority Corridor Regional Destinations Metropolitan Job Centers Regional Job Centers Subregional Job Centers Large High Schools Colleges & Universities Highly Visited Regional Parks Major Sport & Entertainment Centers Figure 5-12: Regional Bicycle Transportation Network Figure 5-16: Conceptual Regional Trail System Figure 5-15: Conceptual Bike Trail System Dayton Greenfield Hanover Independence PlymouthMedina Corcoran Maple Grove Rogers No r t h - S o u t h 1 North - South 1 La k e I n d e p e n d e n c e La k e I n d e p e n d e n c e Crow River RushCreek Hanover Crow Hassan Regional Parks System 0123450.5 Miles City of Corcoran, Hennepin County Regional Parks Existing In Master Plan Planned Parks and Reserves Regional Trails Existing Regional Trails Planned Regional Trails Regional Trail Corridor Land Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge State Parks State Wildlife Management Areas (Publicly Accessible) Scientific and Natural Areas (SNA) Other Parks and Preserves Existing State Trails Street Centerlines (NCompass) Lakes and Major Rivers Regional Park Search Areas and Regional Trail Search Corridors Boundary Adjustments Search Areas Regional Trails - 2040 System Additions Regional Trail Search Corridors Figure 5-13: Regional Trail Search Area Figure 5-14: Diamond Lake RT Map 76 77 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers % Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Oakdale Dr B r i d l e Pa t h J e f f r e y L n Abilene Ln Tr a i l L n Hunters Rdg County Road 30 He a t he r Ln Pi o n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd County R o a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n H o r s e s h o e Bend D r Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w y Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 E S t Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r E l mSt Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old Se t t le rs R d County R oad 1 1 7 Sti e g R d Be c h t o l d R d Ka l k R d Schutte Rd Meister Rd F o x Va ll e y Dr M y s t i q u e Dr Ha g e Dr 93rd Ave N Sc hut t e P l B r a n d y w i n e Rd Chisholm T r l Tessmer Rd High Blu ff L n Winc hesterTrl Jubert Ln R u s h C r e e k RushCreek County Ditc h N u m b e r S i x t e e n Co u n t y Ditch N u m ber Three SouthFor k Ru s h C r e e k NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1 Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and Trails Regional Trail Existing On Road Trail City Park Trailhead Private Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and Trails Proposed On Road Trail Proposed Off Road Trail Proposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development Area Neighborhood Park Community Park Greenway Corridor Municipal Boundaries 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands NP 79 Projected Incoming Park Dedication Fees Final Plats Approved Amount Notes Woodland Hills $357,240.00 Tavera 7 $471,677.53 Heather Meadows $59,540.00 Total Final Approved $888,457.53 Preliminary Plats Approved Fairway Shores $333,516.10 At least a 2 phase development Total Preliminarily Approved $333,516.10 Incoming Applications Chastek Family Farm $619,216.00 At least a 2 phase development Camp Solberg $11,908.00 Total Pending Approval $631,124.00 Hope Community Development Hope Community Development $2,541,227.30 At least 4 more phases of the development Total $2,541,227.30 Total Projected Incoming $4,394,324.93 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7c. Council Meeting February 13, 2025 Prepared By Jessica Christensen Buck Topic 60% Design – City Park Action Required Direction Summary This report provides an update on the City Park Remaster project, summarizing key milestones, public engagement, design progress, and anticipated next steps. Project History and Recent Updates: • October 24, 2024: City Council reviewed 30% design plans, which included the layout of amenities and features. The Council voted 4-1 to approve specific edits to the schematic diagram and authorized staff to proceed with design development and construction documents, with a clarified budget reflecting the full scope of obligations. • November 2024: A public engagement survey and open house were conducted to gather feedback on the park design. • December 19, 2024: The Parks and Trails Commission received a memo summarizing public feedback: o Strong preference for the inclusion of a splashpad and playground. o Emphasis on connectivity and safety, particularly regarding paths and safe crossings. o Of the 197 survey responses, the majority were from families with children aged 25-44, with 90% residing in Corcoran. • December 19, 2024 & January 16, 2025: The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed 60% designs and recommended vendors for the playground (Playworld) and splashpad (Aquatix). Anticipated Next Steps: • Councilors are requested to provide input on the 60% designs, specifically regarding the base bid and alternate designs, and to confirm approval for construction documentation as previously authorized on October 24, 2024. • The completion of construction documents will provide more accurate cost estimates. • Finalized designs and cost estimates will be presented to the Parks and Trails Commission and City Council for review and approval before proceeding to the bidding phase. • The project is expected to be delivered through two bid packages: one for site work and one for the building. Paving and Trails An 8-foot asphalt trail surrounds the western, northern, and eastern portions of the parking lot, with an alternate route proposed to connect to the t-ball fields. Concrete paths link the parking lot to the building plaza and extend through the splashpad and playground areas. A concrete pickleball plaza is also proposed as an alternate feature. The future Diamond Lake Regional Trail would be constructed as a 10-foot-wide Page 2 bituminous path with a 2-foot shoulder, incorporating a boardwalk along the northwest portion. Boardwalk construction and rough grading for the trail are included in Phase 1, with potential paving as funding allows. The existing crushed path between the ballfields will remain as part of Phase 1. Trees and Landscape The plan prioritizes tree retention, following the Parks and Trails Commission's recommendation. Only trees necessary for construction and ash trees, with consideration towards the absence of a treatment plan, are proposed to be removed. Additional trees would be planted within the parking lot, along County Road 50 for buffering, and near the ballfield northwest of the playground. Landscaping is intended to focus on low-maintenance solutions throughout the park. Lighting Three lighting options are included in the project: pedestrian-scale lights, bollard walkway lights, and parking lot lights. Lighting around the playground is proposed as an alternate. The building will feature exterior lighting to enhance visibility and safety. Building The proposed building will include a gathering space with a total capacity of 75-90 people or two separate rooms accommodating 30 and 60 people. Inside, there will be three bathrooms: two single-occupancy, gender-neutral restrooms (SOGN) and the family restroom with an adult changing table, as required by code. Exterior-access restrooms include the family restroom and an additional SOGN restroom. The doors to access the interior restrooms for the dual access family restroom is anticipated to be on a digital locking system. Three storage areas are shown on the plans: one for building mechanicals, table and chair storage, and another within the catering kitchen. The building is anticipated to support City-run programs and events, with the kitchen storage location utilized to store frequently used items. A catering kitchen is shown including a three-compartment sink, refrigerator/freezer, handwashing sink, and preparation countertops. It will have direct access to the larger gathering space, an outdoor door, and a serving window for coordinated use with the patio and shelter, which are alternates. The building’s exterior will feature vertical wood siding in black ash, grey, or red, a metal roof, and windows at the front and back of the main gathering space. Playground Three vendors provided designs for the project, with a recommendation during the January 16, 2025, meeting to select Playworld as the vendor. The vendor provided their submission early and worked with the consultants to provide variations of the design. The playground is shown with an agricultural theme to reflect Corcoran’s local history, as reflected in the survey feedback. It will include play areas for children aged 2–5 and 5–12, as well as a zipline area proposed as an alternate. The 2–5-year-old area features a tractor, with the Parks and Trails Commission requesting more features be incorporated into this structure. A small embankment slide is integrated into the hillside. The 5–12-year-old area includes two bridges and a large embankment slide. Poured-in- place rubber surfacing would be used on the hillside to accommodate the features, Page 3 while engineered wood fiber would cover the remaining playground containers. Multiple swing options, including a bucket swing and ADA-compliant swing, are shown. A third playground area featuring a zipline is proposed as an alternate, with positive feedback from the community supporting its inclusion. Splashpad The plans proposed were requested to include two design options focused on integrating ground-level and above-ground features. The features included allow for future updates, such as lighting and additional above-ground feature integration. The Parks and Trails Commission recommended continuing with Aquatix during its December 19, 2024, meeting. Per code requirements, restrooms would have to be included with a splashpad. Alternate Items Alternates shown include paving and lighting along trails through the ballfields, six pickleball courts with a plaza, an accessible paved trail to the t-ball fields, an open-air shelter behind the park building, and expanded storage at the splashpad mechanical system. Other considerations The regional trail development along the northeast section may impact the playground layout. Some funding sources are tied to specific amenities, and if those amenities are not included in the final plan, discussions with the contributing parties will be necessary. Initial funding commitments include $100,000 from the NW Area Jaycees for the splashpad, a to be determined contribution in coordination with the Wacker/Espeseth family for the playground, and up to $1,050,000 from the Three Rivers Park District for the regional trail with reimbursement split for 2025 and 2026. Additional funding opportunities include the Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant, HUD federal funding, and donations from the Hanover and Corcoran Athletic Associations, totaling approximately $850,000 toward the project, prior to Park Dedication fees. Staff continues to seek out additional funding opportunities, such as grants. The Park Dedication Fund currently holds approximately $5.3 million, with additional funds anticipated this year. This total includes the design and engineering fees incurred for the project as of the time of this report. Page 4 Financial/Budget Scenario: 1A Scenario: 1B Scenario: 2A Scenario: 2B Scenario: 3 Total Needed $4.5 million $5.3 million $6.9 million $7.2 million $11.7 million External Funds In-Hand $150k* $150k* $150k* $150k* $150k* External Reimbursements $1.325 million $1.325 million $1.325 million $1.325 million $1.325 million Park Ded. Use $3.025 million $3.825 million <$5.3 million <$5.3 million <$5.3 million Park Ded. Remaining $2.275 million $1.475 million $0 $0 $0 Addtl. Amount Needed $0 $0 $125k $425k >$4.925 million Included amenities Playground, fields, parking lot, regional trial Full building, gravel parking lot Full building, paved parking lot, and fields ½ building (restrooms), paved parking lot, playground or splashpad Full plan: Building, playground, splashpad, and fields (with alternates) Amenities not included Building and splashpad Fields, playground, and splashpad Playground and splashpad Playground or splashpad Park Dedication total is based on balance as of February 5, 2025 at approximately $5.3 million. External Funds In-Hand show funds from the Corcoran Athletic Association ($5,622), Hanover Athletic Association ($45,000) and the Northwest Area Jaycees ($100,000). The donation from the Northwest Area Jaycees would need to be confirmed if the money could be utilized for amenities other than a splashpad. External reimbursements include the Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant ($300,000), HUD federal funding ($500,000), Three Rivers Park District’s cooperative agreement ($525,000 included on the chart above – up to a total of $1,050,000 between 2025 and 2026 is anticipated). It should be noted that the City will need to cover the initial costs upfront and will be reimbursed afterward. Scenarios 2A, 2B, and 3 would require additional means of funding, but staff has heard from City Council no current desire to bond for the project. Scenario 3 is shown with the full plan, if implemented, with alternates included. The City Council has expressed disinterest in bonding at this time. The scenario is for the purposes of discussion. Page 5 Recommendation Staff recommendation is City Council confirms moving forward with one of the proposed scenarios shown above, or a combination of the scenarios with guidance to staff, into the construction documentation phase of the project as recommended during the October 24, 2024, City Council meeting. Attachments 1. 60% Design and Budget Presentation 2. December 19, 2024, Parks and Trails Commission Meeting Memo – City Park Survey Results 1 CORCORAN CITY PARK PLANNING & DESIGN 60% DESIGN REVIEW & BUDGET SCENARIOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEB. 13, 2025 2 DESIGN PROCESS Site Analysis Project Programming Concept Planning Preferred Concept Schematic Design 30% Design Set Design Development Construction Documentation Bidding & Construction Project opening 60% Design Set 100% Design Set Dec ‘23-Jan ‘24 Jan-Feb ‘24 Mar-May ‘24 Jun-Jul ‘24 Jul-Sept ‘24 Oct ‘24 - Feb ‘25 Jan-Mar ‘25 Apr-Oct ‘25 Fall/Winter ‘25-’26 3 WET WET WET WET WETWETWET WE T WE T WE T WET WET WET WETWET WET WET WET WE T WE T WETWETWE T WE T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WET WET WE TWET WET WET WET 0 SCALE: 1" = 300'-0" 600'300'150' NORTH Existing Balleld Meister Field Lions Field Hockey Rink Small Hockey Pickleball Courts Basketball Courts Warming House/ Maintenance Building 4,000 SF 18 2,000 SF Future Expansion Overow Parking 54 52 28 28 42 42 13 153 Building/ Pavilion7,500 SF Existing Shelter Tennis Courts Free Skate T-Ball Field T-Ball Field T-Ball Field T-Ball Field Playground Open Green Space (U10 Soccer Fields) New Parking Lot New Parking Lot Parking Lot Splash Pad Existing BalleldSnyder Field Existing Balleld Regional Trailhead Regional Trail Connection Relocated CR 50 Access Point Regional Trail Connection Regional Trail Corcoran City Park: Concept A DRAFT 03.15.2024 180’ 12 0 ’ 180’ 12 0 ’ 180’ 12 0 ’ 180’ 12 0 ’ 6 Ballelds 4 T-Ball Fields 4 U10 Soccer Fields 0 Full Size Soccer Field 277 Parking Stalls Amphitheater New Trunk Sewer Connection CR 50 CR 10 Existing Sewer/ Water Lines Future Ballelds/ Multi-use Fields Future Ballelds/ Multi-use Fields DESIGN PROCESS Site Analysis Preferred Concept Schematic Design Design Development Programming Concept Planning 4 PROJECT SCHEDULE UPDATE • February 13, 2025, CC Meeting • 60% Design Review • Budget scenarios discussion 5 PURPOSE OF THE MEETING • Seeking from the City Council: • Input on 60% Design »Base bid and alternate design • Budget options and scenarios »Which scenario should the design team move forward? 6 NOVEMBER 2024 ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY • Top Priorities for Park Amenities • Splash pad and playground are the most desired features • Strong interest in pickleball courts, shaded seating, and accessible pathways • Design and Landscape Preferences • Emphasis on integrating native vegetation and shade trees • Desire for pollinator-friendly and low-water-use plantings • Playground and Splash Pad Insights • Preferences for slides, embankment features, and sensory-inclusive play areas • Strong support for nature- themed splash pad with both ground-level and above-ground sprayers • Additional Desired Features - potential later phase or integration in other parks • Off-leash dog park, trail connections, and seating options • Restrooms, concessions, and shaded gathering spaces • Connectivity and Safety • Improved walking and biking paths, safe crossings to surrounding neighborhoods • Focus on accessible design for all ages and abilities • Community Vision • Incorporate Minnesota heritage and local identity into park themes • Build with sustainability and future expansion in mind • Demographics of Respondents • Majority are families with children, aged 25-44, residing in Corcoran 7 SITE PLAN C R - 1 0 CR-50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 16 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 1315 12 14 102 2 2 C R - 1 0 Create level field space for multi-purpose recreation including soccer and cricket Stormwater management Pave parking lot (+/-260 spaces) Youth ballfield Destination playground Splash pad Patio and shelter Park building Overflow parking/future paved parking (+/- 45 spaces) Pickleball courts Gravel parking Trailhead with paved parking Pedestrian Crossing Amphitheater Regional trail Tennis Courts Park equipment storage buildings LEGEND Alternates Future Phase 8 PAVING AND TRAILS 10’ TRPD Regional Trail w/ 2’ Shoulder Existing Crushed Path, to remain Boardwalk 8’ Asphalt Trail Concrete Pickleball Plaza Connect to Existing Path Reuse Existing Bridge Crossing Connect to Rush Creek Reserve Development LEGEND Proposed Asphalt Proposed Concrete Proposed Regional Trail Boardwalk ADA Route C R - 1 0 CR-50 9 TREES AND LANDSCAPE LEGEND Existing Trees, to remain Existing Trees, to remove Proposed Deciduous Trees Proposed Coniferous Trees Landscape Area C R - 1 0 CR-50 TREES AND LANDSCAPE CR-50 LEGEND Existing Trees, to remain Existing Trees, to remove Proposed Deciduous Trees Proposed Coniferous Trees Landscape Area Proposed Deciduous Trees River Birch Betula nigra White Spruce Picea glauca Type A: Low-maintenance Planting Beds Type B: Grass Heavy Prairie Type C: Natural Pollinator Prairie Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor Eastern Redcedar Juniperus virginiana Red Maple Acer rubrum Black Hills Spruce Picea glauca var. densata Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Scotch Pine Pinus sylvestris American Elm Ulmus americana Norway Spruce Picea abies Proposed Coniferous Trees Landscape Area 10 11 STORMWATER C R - 1 0 CR-50 Wet basin Wet during rain events Dry pond 12 LIGHTING C R - 1 0 CR-50 LEGEND Pedestrian Scale Path/Area Lights Bollard Walkway Lights Parking Lot Lights LIGHTING CR-50 LEGEND Pedestrian Scale Path/Area Lights Bollard Walkway Lights Parking Lot Lights Bollard/Walkway Lighting Parking lot lights will be standard cobra lights Pedestrian Scale Path/ Area Lights Model: OutlineManufacturer: Landscape FormsApproximate Cost (w/o ship. + tax): $1,875 Post: BOL 14’ Wood Pole Luminaire: Lumenpulse Allegra Fixture and Arm Manufacturer: Structura (post); Lumenpulse (luminaire) Approximate Cost (w/o ship. + tax): $4,400 (post) + $2,500 (luminaire) Notes: Agrarian Style; LED; Dark Sky compliant; Good for edge conditions, open air spaces, along trails, and in parks • Goal • Provide security lighting for parking lot • Alternate: ped lighting at playground areas • Lighting design • Preliminary examples below 13 VESTIBULE 102 MAIN GATHERING 101 MECHANICAL - STORAGE 105 FAMILY SOGN RR 108 CATERING KITCHEN 109 74'-812" 44 ' - 0 12" 74'-812" SOGN RR 111 STORAGE 110 HALLWAY 103 STORAGE 106 SOGN RR 107 SOGN RR 104 60 ' - 0 12" 1.0 2 A-302 B 2.0 3.0 A D E B A D E 1.0 2.0 3.0 WALL TYPES A PLAN NOTES OPERABLE PARTITION (ALTERNATE) ALL IN ONE SINK / HAND DRYER / COUNTERTOP ADA COMPLIANT GRAB BARS MOP SINK W/ F.R.P. SURROUND HAND WASHING SINK DUAL-HEIGHT DRINKING FOUNTAIN / WATER COOLER / WITH BOTTLE FILLER ADA COMPLIANT MOTORIZED ADULT CHANGING STATION BABY CHANGING STATION STAINLESS STEEL COUNTERTOP AND BACKSPLASH STAINLESS STEEL COUNTERTOP / SHELF 3 COMPARTMENT SINK REFRIGERATOR / FREEZER (BY OWNER) 01 02 03 04 05 10 06 07 08 09 11 12 5 1/2" WOOD FRAMING w/ (1) LAYER 5 8" GYP. BD. ON EACH SIDE - PROVIDE SOUND BATT INSULATION GENERAL NOTES: PROVIDE WATER RESISTANT BACKING BOARD @ ALL RESTROOM & KITCHEN LOCATIONS SEE STRUCTURAL FOR LINTEL SCHEDULE COORDINATE WITH CIVIL, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS 14'-814"27'-33 4"32'-812"10'-8" 4'-4"5'-614"7'-1012"3'-4"2'-612"7'-0"9'-93 4"2'-0"612"4'-914"512"3'-112"512"10'-0"512"3'-112"512"4'-914"612"2'-0" 42'-0"32'-812" 7'-33 4"2'-0" 612" 4'-914" 512" 3'-112" 512" 10'-0" 512" 3'-112" 512" 4'-914" 612" 2'-0" 8'- 0 " 4'- 0 " C 4'- 0 " 2'- 0 14" 3'- 4 " 4'- 7 14" 6'- 8 " 8'- 7 14" 3'- 4 " 2'- 0 14" 4'- 0 " 4'- 0 " 4'- 6 14" 3'- 4 " 512" 4'- 9 " 4'- 0 14" 4'- 1 34" 4'- 9 " 512" 3'- 4 " 4'- 1 34" 4'- 0 14" 4'- 9 " 512" 3'- 4 " 4'- 6 14" 2 A-302 3 A-302 3 A-302 4 A-302 4 A-302 5 A-302 5 A-302 1 A-303 1 A-303 A A AA A 8'-0" 63 4" 6'-212" 63 4" 2'-914" 63 4" 13'-6" 63 4" 8'-812" 63 4" 30'-8" A 12'-1112" 63 4" 1'-0"3'-4" 3" 63 4" 7'-1114" 63 4" 1'-5"3'-4" 3" 63 4" 8'-812" 63 4" 8'-8"63 4"3'-83 4" 63 4" 1'-0"3'-4"3"63 4"7'-1114"63 4"1'-5"3'-4"3"63 4"7'-914" 1114"63 4"3'-4"27'-4" 4'- 4 " 3'- 4 " 4'- 1 14" 634" 9'- 5 14" 634" 8'- 0 " 634" 3'- 5 14" 11 ' - 9 14" 634" 9'- 5 14" 634" 9'- 8 " 634" 3'- 5 14" 6'- 0 " 8'- 0 " 6'- 4 " 634" 4'- 2 12" 634" 8'- 0 " 634" 1'- 9 14" 6'- 4 " 1'- 4 " 634" 514" 3'- 4 " 2'- 0 " 4'- 0 " 2'- 0 " utility sink? A A A A A A A A A A A A 01 0101 0203 06 0203 04 05 07 08 08 0203 02 03 08 10 09 09 111212 ABOVE 10 2 A W01 102B 10 2 C W03 W02 W03W02 W04 W05 ABOVE W06 ABOVE ABOVE W12W11 ABOVE W10 ABOVE 101A 101B W07 ABOVE W08 W07 ABOVE W08 W08 W09 ABOVE W03 W02 W03W02 W12 W11 ABOVE W10 ABOVE ABOVE W04W05 ABOVE W06 ABOVE 106 109B RC-1 110 10 9 A 111 108A 10 8 B 105A 10 5 B W10 W11 10 4 10 7 7'-214" RC - 2 OH1 OH1 7'- 6 " 4'- 8 34" 8'- 8 12" 3'- 4 " 1'-1112" 6" 6" 7'-6" ABOVE W10 ABOVE W10 ABOVE W10 ABOVE W10 2'-8"1'-312" 2'-8"5'-612"2'-8"5'-612"1'-312"2'-8"5'-614"1'-312" 2'- 9 14"A 1 A-502 1 A-504 4'-4"10'-8" A-701 32 1 A-7015 4 A-701 6 A-701 3 SIM. A-7022 1 A-702 5 4 3 A-701 3 OPP.2 OPP. 1 OPP.3 A-504 24-26 A-101 Floor Plan.dwg1-30-2025 phone: (651) 696-5186 www.oertelarchitects.com 1795 Saint Clair Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55105 OERTEL ARCHITECTS, LTD. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 01-31-2025 RAB / EMW TRS 24-26 CI T Y O F C O R C O R A N CO R C O R A N C O M M U N I T Y P A R K - MA I N P A R K B U I L D I N G Signature Name License #Date Thomas Stromsodt RE V I S I O N S / I S S U E NO . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N 1 2 3 FLOOR PLAN A1011FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 60 % P R O G R E S S S E T 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 5 BUILDING PROGRAM / FLOOR PLAN Common area Restroom Kitchen Storage Egress 14 CORCORAN 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" 2 A-302 PREFINISHED METAL STANDING SEAM ROOFING SYSTEM 1.0 3.03 A-302 4 A-302 WOOD FASCIA AND TRIM (STAIN) PREFINISHED METAL GUTTER VERTICAL WOOD SIDING (STAIN) INSULATED CONCRETE MASONRY SYSTEM PREFINISHED METAL STANDING SEAM ROOFING SYSTEM WOOD FASCIA AND TRIM (STAIN) VERTICAL WOOD SIDING (STAIN) INSULATED CONCRETE MASONRY SYSTEM PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS VERTICAL BI-FOLD OVERHEAD DOORS OH1 W01 W03 W02 W02 W03 W04 W12W05W11W06W10 102A W10W10W10 2.0 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" 5 A-302 1 A-303E A PREFINISHED METAL STANDING SEAM ROOFING SYSTEM WOOD FASCIA AND TRIM (STAIN) PREFINISHED METAL GUTTER VERTICAL WOOD SIDING (STAIN) INSULATED CONCRETE MASONRY SYSTEM PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS PREFINISHED METAL DOWNSPOUT 101A 101B W07 W08 W08 W08W09 W10 3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" 2 A-302 1.03.0 3 A-302 4 A-302 PREFINISHED METAL STANDING SEAM ROOFING SYSTEM WOOD FASCIA AND TRIM (STAIN) PREFINISHED METAL GUTTER VERTICAL WOOD SIDING (STAIN) INSULATED CONCRETE MASONRY SYSTEM PREFINISHED METAL STANDING SEAM ROOFING SYSTEM WOOD FASCIA AND TRIM (STAIN) VERTICAL WOOD SIDING (STAIN) INSULATED CONCRETE MASONRY SYSTEM PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS VERTICAL BI-FOLD OVERHEAD DOORS PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CLAD DOORS PREFINISHED ALUMINUM INSULATED, GLAZED, AWNING COUNTER WINDOW W03 W02 W02 W03 W04 W12W05W11W06W10 OH1 109A RC1 W10 2.0 24-26 A-301 Exterior Elevations_Building Sections.dwg1-30-2025 phone: (651) 696-5186 www.oertelarchitects.com1795 Saint Clair Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55105 OERTEL ARCHITECTS, LTD. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 01-31-2025 RAB / EMW TRS 24-26 CI T Y O F C O R C O R A N CO R C O R A N C O M M U N I T Y P A R K - MA I N P A R K B U I L D I N G Signature Name License #Date Thomas Stromsodt RE V I S I O N S / I S S U E NO . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N 1 2 3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A301 NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 60 % P R O G R E S S S E T 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 5 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 15 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 BUILDING EXTERIOR: BLACK ASH 16 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 BUILDING EXTERIOR: GREY 17 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 CORCORAN COMMUNITY PARK Option D Render Package 01/03/2024 BUILDING EXTERIOR: RED 18 PLAYGROUND • Playground Direction »Overall design to be farm/agriculture theme – Twin Silos Park to be main precedent for design direction »(1) large and (1) small embankment slide »(1) large tower to connect into hillside with custom features and bridge »(1) custom tractor in the 2-5yr area »Multiple swing bays ADA bucket swing and belt swings • Note: The colors shown on the following slides are changeable Playground (Ages 5-12) Playground (Ages 2-5) Park Building Drop-off Splash Pad Equipment Building Splash Pad 19 Equipment ManufacturerSales RepresentativeCommunity Park Corcoran, MN 20 Equipment ManufacturerSales RepresentativeCommunity Park Corcoran, MN 21 Equipment ManufacturerSales RepresentativeCommunity Park Corcoran, MN ZIP LINE (ALTERNATE) 22 23 SPLASH PAD • Splash Pad Direction »Overall design to be farm/agriculture theme »Create clear areas of younger vs older kids »Combination of above ground features and in- ground jets »Possibility to incorporate some integrated lighting if desired »Allow for possible future change outs of in- ground to above ground features. Park Building Drop-off Splash Pad Equipment Building Splash Pad Playground (Ages 5-12) Playground (Ages 2-5) 24 ©2024 Aquatix by Landscape Structures. All Rights Reserved | aquatix.playlsi.com Community Park Splash Pad Design# 1189239-01-03 09/06/24 SPLASH PAD - AQUATIX 25 ©2024 Aquatix by Landscape Structures. All Rights Reserved | aquatix.playlsi.com Community Park Splash Pad Design# 1189239-01-03 09/06/24 SPLASH PAD - AQUATIX 26 REGIONAL TRAIL • Plan to install boardwalk and rough grading in Phase 1; potential paving • Phase 2 may include paving the trail in 2026 10’ TRPD Regional Trail w/ 2’ Shoulder Boardwalk Reuse Existing Bridge Crossing Connect to Rush Creek Reserve Development 27 ALTERNATE ITEMS C R - 1 0 CR-50 C R - 1 0 Paved trails through cloverleaf 6 Pickleball Courts Open air shelter behind park building Expanded storage at splashpad mech. Accessible paved trail down to t-ball fields Irrigation Lighting Lighting 28 BUDGET SCENARIOS SCENARIO 1A SCENARIO 1B SCENARIO 2A SCENARIO 2B SCENARIO 3 Playground, soccer fields, parking lot (min. 203 stalls) and regional trail; no building and splashpad Full Building with utilities and gravel parking lot (does not meet city code), no playground and splashpad Full building, minimum paved parking lot, no playground and splashpad 1/2 Building (restrooms) with parking lot and playground (limited elements), either splashpad or playground Full plan, full building, playground, splashpad, fields, with alternates (pickleball) TOTAL ESTIMATED INVESTMENT 2025 (construction cost + remaining design fees) $4,416,950.00 $5,277,150.00 $6,949,200.00 $7,213,700.00 $11,683,100.00 29 ITEM SCENARIO 1A SCENARIO 1B SCENARIO 2A SCENARIO 2B SCENARIO 3 Playground, soccer fields, parking lot (min. 203 stalls) and regional trail; no building and splashpad Full Building with utilities and gravel parking lot (does not meet city code), no playground and splashpad Full building, minimum paved parking lot, no playground and splashpad 1/2 Building (restrooms) with parking lot and playground (limited elements), either splashpad or playground Full plan, full building, playground, splashpad, fields, with alternates (pickleball) Site work + utilities $1,133,000.00 $700,000.00 $1,133,000.00 $1,133,000.00 $1,172,000.00 Electrical + lighting $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $195,000.00 $195,000.00 $275,000.00 Parking lot paving $700,000.00 $700,000.00 $700,000.00 $980,000.00 Park Building $2,800,000.00 $2,800,000.00 $2,200,000.00 $2,800,000.00 Playground $850,000.00 $800,000.00 $850,000.00 Splash pad $760,000.00 Furnishings (tables, benches, signage) $40,000.00 $15,000.00 $60,000.00 $80,000.00 $90,000.00 Pavements (plazas + internal trails/sidewalks) $110,000.00 $96,000.00 $140,000.00 $140,000.00 $280,000.00 Landscaping/screening/trees $60,000.00 $30,000.00 $80,000.00 $90,000.00 $197,000.00 SE ballfield restoration $25,000.00 Subtotal $2,993,000.00 $3,741,000.00 $5,108,000.00 $5,338,000.00 $7,429,000.00 Alternates (pickleball, paved trails, shelter, etc.) $1,665,000.00 Mobilization & Project Contingency (15%) $448,950.00 $561,150.00 $766,200.00 $800,700.00 $1,364,100.00 Regional Trail (2025) $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $3,966,950.00 $4,827,150.00 $6,399,200.00 $6,663,700.00 $10,983,100.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (already spent) $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (remaining projected) $450,000.00 $450,000.00 $550,000.00 $550,000.00 $700,000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENT 2025 (construction cost + remaining fees) $4,416,950.00 $5,277,150.00 $6,949,200.00 $7,213,700.00 $11,683,100.00 Regional Trail (2026) $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 Funding Source Amount NW Area Jaycees* $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Henn. Co. Youth Sports Grant $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 HUD $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 Hanover Athletic Association $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 Corcoran Athletic Association $5,622.41 $5,622.41 $5,622.41 $5,622.41 $5,622.41 Wacker/Espeseth Family tbd tbd tbd tbd tbd See My Legacy tbd tbd tbd tbd tbd TRPD reimbursement (2025) $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 Total of non-city funding $1,375,622.41 $1,475,622.41 $1,475,622.41 $1,475,622.41 $1,475,622.41 Park Dedication / City funding needed 2025 $3,041,327.59 $3,801,527.59 $5,473,577.59 $5,738,077.59 $10,207,477.59 TRPD reimbursement (2026) $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 $525,000.00 Alternates (pickleball, paved trails, shelter, etc.) $1,665,000.00 Pickleball $450,000.00 Trails through pinwheel for maint vehicles $50,000.00 Trail for t-ball access $40,000.00 Addl storage shed at splashpad $150,000.00 Storage bldg at ballfields $120,000.00 Open air shelter at patio $215,000.00 Irrigation system $250,000.00 Pickleball court light poles $160,000.00 Baseball field light poles (SE field) $230,000.00 30 SCENARIO 1A - $4.5M C R - 1 0 CR-50 C R - 1 0 Soccer fields Stormwater Playground Parking lot ITEM SCENARIO 1A Playground, soccer fields, parking lot (min. 203 stalls) and regional trail; no building and splashpad Site work + utilities $1,133,000.00 Electrical + lighting $100,000.00 Parking lot paving $700,000.00 Park Building Playground $850,000.00 Splash pad Furnishings (tables, benches, signage) $40,000.00 Pavements (plazas + internal trails/sidewalks) $110,000.00 Landscaping/screening/trees $60,000.00 SE ballfield restoration Subtotal $2,993,000.00 Alternates (pickleball, paved trails, shelter, etc.) Mobilization & Project Contingency (15%) $448,950.00 Regional Trail (2025) $525,000.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $3,966,950.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (already spent) $200,000.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (remaining projected) $450,000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENT 2025 (construction cost + remaining fees) $4,416,950.00 Regional Trail (2026) $525,000.00 Funding Source Amount NW Area Jaycees* Henn. Co. Youth Sports Grant $300,000.00 HUD $500,000.00 Hanover Athletic Association $45,000.00 Corcoran Athletic Association $5,622.41 Wacker/Espeseth Family tbd See My Legacy tbd TRPD reimbursement (2025) $525,000.00 Total of non-city funding $1,375,622.41 Park Dedication / City funding needed 2025 $3,041,327.59 TRPD reimbursement (2026) $525,000.00 Regional trail Playground, soccer fields, parking lot (min. 203 stalls) and regional trail; no building and splashpad 31 SCENARIO 1B - $5.3M C R - 1 0 CR-50 C R - 1 0 Gravel parking lot Full building Stormwater ITEM SCENARIO 1B Full Building with utilities and gravel parking lot (does not meet city code), no playground and splashpad Site work + utilities $700,000.00 Electrical + lighting $100,000.00 Parking lot paving Park Building $2,800,000.00 Playground Splash pad Furnishings (tables, benches, signage) $15,000.00 Pavements (plazas + internal trails/sidewalks) $96,000.00 Landscaping/screening/trees $30,000.00 SE ballfield restoration Subtotal $3,741,000.00 Alternates (pickleball, paved trails, shelter, etc.) Mobilization & Project Contingency (15%) $561,150.00 Regional Trail (2025) $525,000.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $4,827,150.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (already spent) $200,000.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (remaining projected) $450,000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENT 2025 (construction cost + remaining fees) $5,277,150.00 Regional Trail (2026) $525,000.00 Funding Source NW Area Jaycees* $100,000.00 Henn. Co. Youth Sports Grant $300,000.00 HUD $500,000.00 Hanover Athletic Association $45,000.00 Corcoran Athletic Association $5,622.41 Wacker/Espeseth Family tbd See My Legacy tbd TRPD reimbursement (2025) $525,000.00 Total of non-city funding $1,475,622.41 Park Dedication / City funding needed 2025 $3,801,527.59 TRPD reimbursement (2026) $525,000.00 Full Building with utilities and gravel parking lot (does not meet city code); no fields, playground, and splashpad Regional trail 32 SCENARIO 2A - $6.9M C R - 1 0 CR-50 C R - 1 0 Parking lot Full building Stormwater ITEM SCENARIO 2A Full building, minimum paved parking lot, no playground and splashpad Site work + utilities $1,133,000.00 Electrical + lighting $195,000.00 Parking lot paving $700,000.00 Park Building $2,800,000.00 Playground Splash pad Furnishings (tables, benches, signage) $60,000.00 Pavements (plazas + internal trails/sidewalks) $140,000.00 Landscaping/screening/trees $80,000.00 SE ballfield restoration Subtotal $5,108,000.00 Alternates (pickleball, paved trails, shelter, etc.) Mobilization & Project Contingency (15%) $766,200.00 Regional Trail (2025) $525,000.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $6,399,200.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (already spent) $200,000.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (remaining projected) $550,000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENT 2025 (construction cost + remaining fees) $6,949,200.00 Regional Trail (2026) $525,000.00 Funding Source NW Area Jaycees* $100,000.00 Henn. Co. Youth Sports Grant $300,000.00 HUD $500,000.00 Hanover Athletic Association $45,000.00 Corcoran Athletic Association $5,622.41 Wacker/Espeseth Family tbd See My Legacy tbd TRPD reimbursement (2025) $525,000.00 Total of non-city funding $1,475,622.41 Park Dedication / City funding needed 2025 $5,473,577.59 TRPD reimbursement (2026) $525,000.00 Full building, minimum paved parking lot; no playground and splashpad Regional trail Soccer fields Soccer fields 33 SCENARIO 2B - $7.2M C R - 1 0 CR-50 C R - 1 0 Parking lot Playground Restrooms Stormwater ITEM SCENARIO 2B 1/2 Building (restrooms) with parking lot and playground (limited elements), either splashpad or playground Site work + utilities $1,133,000.00 Electrical + lighting $195,000.00 Parking lot paving $700,000.00 Park Building $2,200,000.00 Playground $800,000.00 Splash pad Furnishings (tables, benches, signage) $80,000.00 Pavements (plazas + internal trails/sidewalks) $140,000.00 Landscaping/screening/trees $90,000.00 SE ballfield restoration Subtotal $5,338,000.00 Alternates (pickleball, paved trails, shelter, etc.) Mobilization & Project Contingency (15%) $800,700.00 Regional Trail (2025) $525,000.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $6,663,700.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (already spent) $200,000.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (remaining projected) $550,000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENT 2025 (construction cost + remaining fees) $7,213,700.00 Regional Trail (2026) $525,000.00 Funding Source NW Area Jaycees* $100,000.00 Henn. Co. Youth Sports Grant $300,000.00 HUD $500,000.00 Hanover Athletic Association $45,000.00 Corcoran Athletic Association $5,622.41 Wacker/Espeseth Family tbd See My Legacy tbd TRPD reimbursement (2025) $525,000.00 Total of non-city funding $1,475,622.41 Park Dedication / City funding needed 2025 $5,738,077.59 TRPD reimbursement (2026) $525,000.00 1/2 Building (restrooms) with parking lot and playground (limited elements), fields, either splashpad or playground Regional trail 34 SCENARIO 3 - $11.7M C R - 1 0 CR-50 C R - 1 0 ITEM SCENARIO 3 Full plan, full building, playground, splashpad, fields, with alternates (pickleball) Site work + utilities $1,172,000.00 Electrical + lighting $275,000.00 Parking lot paving $980,000.00 Park Building $2,800,000.00 Playground $850,000.00 Splash pad $760,000.00 Furnishings (tables, benches, signage) $90,000.00 Pavements (plazas + internal trails/sidewalks) $280,000.00 Landscaping/screening/trees $197,000.00 SE ballfield restoration $25,000.00 Subtotal $7,429,000.00 Alternates (pickleball, paved trails, shelter, etc.) $1,665,000.00 Mobilization & Project Contingency (15%) $1,364,100.00 Regional Trail (2025) $525,000.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $10,983,100.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (already spent) $200,000.00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING FEES (remaining projected) $700,000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENT 2025 (construction cost + remaining fees) $11,683,100.00 Regional Trail (2026) $525,000.00 Funding Source NW Area Jaycees* $100,000.00 Henn. Co. Youth Sports Grant $300,000.00 HUD $500,000.00 Hanover Athletic Association $45,000.00 Corcoran Athletic Association $5,622.41 Wacker/Espeseth Family tbd See My Legacy tbd TRPD reimbursement (2025) $525,000.00 Total of non-city funding $1,475,622.41 Park Dedication / City funding needed 2025 $10,207,477.59 TRPD reimbursement (2026) $525,000.00 Alternates (pickleball, paved trails, shelter, etc.) $1,665,000.00 Pickleball $450,000.00 Trails through pinwheel for maint vehicles $50,000.00 Trail for t-ball access $40,000.00 Addl storage shed at splashpad $150,000.00 Storage bldg at ballfields $120,000.00 Open air shelter at patio $215,000.00 Irrigation system $250,000.00 Pickleball court light poles $160,000.00 Baseball field light poles (SE field) $230,000.00 Full plan, full building, playground, splashpad, fields, with alternates (pickleball) 35 BUDGET SCENARIOS SCENARIO 1A SCENARIO 1B SCENARIO 2A SCENARIO 2B SCENARIO 3 Playground, soccer fields, parking lot (min. 203 stalls) and regional trail; no building and splashpad Full Building with utilities and gravel parking lot (does not meet city code), no playground and splashpad Full building, minimum paved parking lot, no playground and splashpad 1/2 Building (restrooms) with parking lot and playground (limited elements), either splashpad or playground Full plan, full building, playground, splashpad, fields, with alternates (pickleball) TOTAL ESTIMATED INVESTMENT 2025 (construction cost + remaining design fees) $4,416,950.00 $5,277,150.00 $6,949,200.00 $7,213,700.00 $11,683,100.00 36 DISCUSSION 37 NEXT STEPS PROJECT DELIVERY APPROACH • Final Design for Budget Scenario 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3? • Or other alternative? • Two bid packages bid in April/May • Bid package #1 - Site Work • Bid package #2 - Building 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov MEMO Meeting Date: December 19, 2024 To: Parks and Trails Commission From: Jessica Christensen Buck, Recreation Supervisor Re: City Park Survey Results ______________________________________________________________________ Community feedback was requested on proposed amenities, features, and themes for park development. The survey received 197 responses, but it should be noted that not all questions were required to be answered by the respondent to submit their feedback. This information reflects the priorities and preferences expressed by survey participants and provides guidance for planning and design efforts. The primary amenities that received the most votes were the playground and splashpad. Preferences for the playground included slides and climbing aspects to be incorporated. Most respondents preferred individual swings, tall embankment slides, and hillside climbing loops as part of the playground. Additionally, including shade trees for shade integration was preferred. The splashpad responses reflected a strong desire for a nature theme, with additional preference towards a combination of above and below-ground level sprayers. Alternate amenity preference was towards the detached shelter and bituminous trails. Similarly, there was strong preference towards paved pathways with accessible slopes. Additional information is included below, reflecting more specifics with statistics from the survey. Amenity Prioritization Primary Amenities (Determined by combining the top three preferences for each amenity): 1. Playground (175 top three rankings) 2. Splashpad (151 top three rankings) 3. Park Building (116 top three rankings) 7b. 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov 4. Pickleball (94 top three rankings) 5. Parking Lot (61 top three rankings) Alternate Amenities (Determined by combining the top three preferences for each amenity): 1. Detached Shelter (162 top three rankings) 2. Bituminous Trails (138 top three rankings) 3. 3rd Playground Container (124 top three rankings) 4. Pickleball Plaza (114 top three rankings) 5. Planting Beds (51 top three rankings) Feedback on Vegetation and Shade • Preferred Vegetation Types: o Shade trees (141 votes) o Colorful shrubs and perennials (121 votes) o Ornamental flowering trees (111 votes) o Native plantings and mowed turf (107 votes) o Prairie restoration (82 votes) Splashpad Design • Theme Preferences: o Most liked: Nature (126 strongly like) o Additional Suggestions: Dinosaur, Minnesota heritage, floral themes, and Corcoran’s farming roots. • Sprayer Preferences: o Strong preference for both above and ground-level sprayers (154 votes). Playground Features • Top Prioritized Equipment (Determined by combining the top three preferences for each amenity): 1. Slides (165 top three rankings) 2. Climbers (132 top three rankings) 3. Zipline (119 top three rankings) 4. Bridges (117 top three rankings) 5. Spinning Amenities (55 top three rankings) • Accessible/Inclusive Features: o Strong preference for paved pathways with accessible slopes, accessible ramps/bridges, and accessible swings. • Swing Options: o Most preferred: Individual swings. o All other options listed were within 14 votes of each other. • Hillside Features: o Most liked: Tall embankment slides and hillside climbing loops. • Shade Integration Preferences: o Shade trees near seating areas (145 votes) 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov o Fabric shade sails (118 votes) o Small shelters or pavilions (104 votes) Additional Desired Amenities Key requests include: • Dog Park/Off-leash Area • Pickleball Facilities • Trail Connections (e.g., Rush Creek and perimeter walking trails) • Restrooms and Drinking Fountains • Seating and Picnic Areas Demographics Residency: • Corcoran: 179 • Hennepin County: 48 • Bordering City: 12 90% of the respondents reported living in Corcoran. Size of the household: • Adult(s) only: 68 • Adult(s), 1 child: 36 • Adult(s), 2-4 children: 76 • Adult(s), 4+ children: 10 • Prefer not to answer: 7 Age: • >18: 3 • 18-24: 4 • 25-34: 40 • 35-44: 82 • 45-54: 22 • 55-64: 17 • 65+ years old: 21 • Prefer not to answer: 8 Attachments None Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 2025 through 2029 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Corcoran, Minnesota Adopted February 13, 2025 Agenda Item 9a. Page 2 Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 City of Corcoran, Minnesota Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan 2025 through 2029 I. INTRODUCTION In 2003, the Minnesota State Legislature adopted a statute (Section 475.521, referred to herein as the “CIP Act”) that allows cities to issue municipal bonds under a capital improvement plan without the usual referendum requirement (except for the so-called “reverse referendum” described in Section III). The CIP Act applies to capital improvements consisting of city halls, public works, and public safety facilities. The 2005 Legislature added towns to the meaning of a municipality and town halls and libraries to the meaning of a capital improvement under the CIP Act. Throughout this plan, the term “capital improvement” refers only to those improvements identified in the CIP Act, as summarized above. Capital expenditures for other public improvements in the City will be financed through other means and are not governed by this plan. As part of the authorization process to issue capital improvement plan bonds, the CIP Act requires municipalities to prepare a five-year capital improvement plan that includes information specific in the statute, and different than the information that municipalities often provide in a more detailed “budget CIP.” This document, therefore, is the “bond CIP” intended to supplement the “budget CIP” to the meet the specific requirements of the CIP Act II. PURPOSE A capital improvement is a major expenditure of municipal funds for the acquisition or betterment to public lands, buildings, or other improvements used as a city hall, town hall, library, public safety, or public works facility, which has a useful life of 5 years or more. For the purposes of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521, capital improvements do not include light rail transit or related activities, parks, road/bridges, administrative buildings other than city or town hall, or land for those facilities. A Capital Improvement Page 3 Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 Plan (CIP) is a document designed to anticipate Capital Improvement expenditures and schedule them over a five -year period so that they may be purchased in the most efficient and cost effective method possible. A CIP allows the matching of expenditures with anticipated income. As potential expenditures are reviewed, the municipality considers the benefits, costs, alternatives and impact on operating expenditures. The City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the “City”) believes the capital improvement process is an important element of responsible fiscal management. Major capital expenditures can be anticipated and coordinated so as to minimize potentially adverse financial impacts caused by the timing and magnitude of capital outlays. This coordination of capital expenditures is important to the City in achieving its goals of adequate physical public assets, preservation of public assets and sound fiscal management. In these financially difficult times good planning is essential for the wise and prudent use of limited financial resources. III. THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING PROCESS The process begins with analysis of the City’s five-year capital improvement needs and funding sources. The City may solicit input from citizens and other governmental units at an early stage, if desired. The City Council then directs staff or consultants to prepare a plan that sets forth the estimated schedule, timing and details of specific capital improvements by year, together with the estimated cost, the need for the improvement, and the sources of revenue for the improvement. The City Council then holds a public hearing on the CIP, with notice published not more than 30 days and not less than seven days for the hearing (except as described below). The Council may either approve the CIP immediately after the hearing or based on input may make revisions and approve the CIP at a later meeting. The Council must approve the issuance of CIP bonds by a 3/5ths vote of its membership. However, the bonds are subject to a so -called “reverse referendum”. If a petition signed by voters equal to at least 5% of the votes cast in the City in last general election is filed with the City Clerk within 30 days after the public hearing regarding the bonds, the bonds may not be issued unless approved by the voters (by a majority of those voting on the question). Further, the maximum debt service in any year on all outstanding CIP Bonds Page 4 Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 is .16% of the estimated market value of property in the City, using the estimated market value for the taxes-payable year in which the bonds are issued. After the CIP has been approved and bonds have been authorized, the City works with its municipal advisor to prepare a bond sale and repayment schedule. Assuming no petition for a referendum is filed, the bonds are sold, and when proceeds from the sale of the bonds (and any other identified revenue sources) become available, the expenditures for spec ified capital improvements can be made. In subsequent years, the process is repeated as expenditures are completed and as new needs arise. Capital improvement planning looks five or more years into the future from the date of the CIP. The City Council, using the process outlined in this CIP, may review this CIP annually or biannually, taking into account proposed expenditures, making priority decisions and seeking funding for those expenditures it deems necessary for the City. IV. PROJECT(S) SUMMARY The capital improvements contemplated to be financed through issuance of general obligation capital improvement plan bonds (referred to as the “CIP Bonds”) in the five-year period of this plan (2025 through 2029) is the first phase of costs relating to the acquisition and construction of a municipal building containing a city hall and public safety facility (the “Government Facility Project”) and improvements to the City’s public works building including floor sealing and the acquisition and construction of a lean-to enclosure (the “Public Works Project”). The CIP Bonds are proposed to be issued in 2025 as part of a larger issuance of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A in a principal amount not to exceed $4,700,000 specifically for the CIP portion of the 2025A issue. At this time, the City does not anticipate any other capital improvements contemplated to be financed through the issuance of capital improvement plan bonds in years 2026 through 2029. However, the City anticipates amending this CIP or securing other funding for to finance later phases of the construction of a municipal building containing a city hall and public safety facility. The CIP Act requires the City Council to consider eight factors in preparing the CIP: Page 5 Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 1. Condition of the City’s existing infrastructure, including projected need for repair or replacement. 2. Likely demand for the improvement. 3. Estimated cost of the improvement. 4. Available public resources. 5. Level of overlapping debt in the City. 6. Relative benefits and costs of alternative uses of funds. 7. Operating costs of the proposed improvements. 8. Alternatives for providing services most efficiently through shared facilities with other cities or local governments. The City has considered the eight points as they relate to the Government Facility Project and the Public Works Project through issuance of CIP Bonds. The findings are as follows: Conditions of City Infrastructure and Need for the Project Government Facility Project The City’s current municipal building serves as a public safety facility and city hall. It was constructed in ___. During that time, the City’s sworn officer staff has increased by _ percent while complaint reports have increased __ percent. The police department needs more space and a more modern facility to deal with the increased need for services due to a wide range of societal and caseload changes. Keeping the City safe and offering the quality of life our residents and visitors deserve, requires a modern police force operating out of modern facilities. The expansion will accommodate the interior storage of vehicles, training space, additional office, and additional storage space. In addition, at the time of the construction of the existing City Hall, the City’s population was approximately _______ and staff anticipates a population of ______ by ____. The current building lacks sufficient space for staff. [ADD MORE FROM CITY] Public Works Project Page 6 Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 The current public building was constructed in ___. The current public works building needs repairs to floor sealing and lacks sufficient storage. Repairing and improving the existing building through the Public Works Project will help extend its useful life. Demand for Project Government Facility Project The City has discussed replacing the municipal building since ___. The Government Facility Project will be used by city staff, the police department and the general public on a daily basis. [Add more information from City if necessary]. Public Works Project The City has been considering the Public Works Project since ____. The Public Works Facility will be used by public works staff on a daily basis. [Add more information from City if necessary.] Estimated Cost of the Project Government Facility Project The City estimates the cost of the Governmental Facility Project to be $4,430,000, not including the cost of financing. This represents the first phase of costs relating to the acquisition construction of a new municipal building to include a city hall and public safety facility. The City anticipates amending this CIP or pursuing other financing options for later phases of the construction of a new municipal building. Public Works Project The City estimates that the cost of the Public Works Project to be $230,000. Availability of Public Resources The City does not have sufficient cash reserves on hand to finance construction of the Public Works Project and the Governmental Facility Project without issuing bonds. The GO CIP Bonds for the Government Page 7 Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 Facility Project and Public Works Project will be paid with ad valorem property taxes. The CIP Bonds will be secured by the City’s full faith and credit. Relative Costs and Benefits of Alternative Uses of the Funds The City has explored alternative options to finance the Government Facility Project and Public Works Project and finds that the issuance of GO CIP Bonds is the most cost-effective option for the City among the limited other options available for the Government Facility Project and Public Works Project. The issuance of general obligation bonds provides the lowest -cost borrowing option for the City. Operating Costs of the Proposed Improvements Government Facility Project It is expected that ongoing operating expenses of any new city hall and public safety facility will be in line with operations in recent years at the City’s existing facilities. However, repairs and maintenance costs are anticipated to decrease due to new construction. There is also the potential that a new building with new systems will reduce operating costs and increase efficiency. Public Works Project The proposed Public Works Project makes minor repairs to an existing facility and the ongoing operating costs of the City’s public works facility will not change due to the Public Works Project. Options for Shared Facilities with Other Cities or Local Government The City seeks opportunities to share governmental services with other local government entities when appropriate. In particular, the City currently shares contracts for fire services with Hanover, Rogers and Loretto. However, in this instance the City does not find that is effective or cost efficient to share its public works facility, public safety building or city hall with other governmental entities due to the nature of the municipal facility and public works facility and the services provided therein. Page 8 Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 Level of Overlapping Debt As of February 12, 2025, the level of overlapping debt in the City is depicted in the table below: Issuer 2023/2024 Tax Capacity Value(1) 2023/2024 Tax Capacity Value in City(1) Percentage Applicable in City Outstanding General Obligation Debt Taxpayers’ Share of Debt Hennepin County $ 2,859,451,218 $19,752,507 0.69% $1,211,355,000 $ 8,358,350 ISD No. 279, Osseo 306,328,374 2,777,877 0.91 358,685,000 3,264,034 ISD No. 284, Wayzata 240,984,017 4,386,667 1.82 175,465,000 3,193,463 ISD No. 877, Buffalo 62,636,554 5,032,172 8.03 68,115,000 5,469,635 ISD No. 879, Delano 27,797,054 1,537,043 5.53 50,945,000 2,817,259 ISD No. 883, Rockford 21,282,289 6,018,748 28.28 22,760,000 6,436,528 Metropolitan Council 6,313,906,529 19,752,507 0.31 7,645,000(2) 23,700 Metro Transit 5,540,695,433 19,752,507 0.36 230,580,000(3) 830,088 Three Rivers Park District 2,052,772,775 19,752,507 0.96 59,870,000(4) 574,752 Hennepin County Railroad Authority 2,859,451,218 19,752,507 0.69 81,665,000(4) 563,489 Total Indirect Debt: $ 31,531,298 (1) Tax Capacity Value is after tax increment deduction and fiscal disparity adjustments. 2024/2025 values are not yet available. (2) Metropolitan Council has $7,645,000 of general obligation debt outstanding as of December 31, 2023. This debt is payable from ad valorem taxes levied on all taxable property within the Metropolitan Taxing District. This amount excludes $1,185,889,000 of general obligation debt payable from wastewater and sewer revenues, and lease agreements. (3) Metropolitan Transit has $230,580,000 of property tax supported general obligation debt outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Transit debt is issued by the Metropolitan Council for public transit operations and is payable from ad valorem taxes levied on all taxable property within the Metropolitan Transit District. This amount excludes $270,715,000 of general obligation debt payable from revenues. (4) As of December 31, 2023. Page 9 Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 V. FINANCING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The total principal amount for the CIP portion of the 2025A issue is not to exceed $4,700,000. This amount represents the maximum principal amount of CIP Bonds that may be issued under this plan. Principal and interest on the CIP Bonds will be paid through ad valorem property taxes over the term of the CIP Bonds, further shown in Appendix A. In the financing of the Capital Improvement Plan, two significant statutory limitations apply. 1. Under Chapter 475, with few exceptions, municipalities cannot incur debt in excess of 3% of the assessor’s estimated market value for the municipality. In the City, the preliminary 2024/2025 estimated market value is $2,004,765,300. Therefore, the total amount of outstanding debt cannot exceed $60,142,959. As of February 12, 2025, the City has $4,890,000 subject to the legal debt limit. Consequently, issuance of the CIP Bonds will be well within the overall statutory debt limit for the City. 2. A separate limitation under the CIP Act is that, without referendum, the total amount of principal and interest in any one year on all CIP Bonds issued by the City cannot exceed 0.16% of the total estimated market value in the municipality. In the City, that maximum annual debt service amount is $3,207,624. The maximum annual principal and interest payment on the CIP Bonds proposed to be issued under this CIP is estimated to be approximately $315,270. When combined with the CIP Portion of the City’s Ser ies 2020B Bonds, the maximum annual principal and interest payment in any one year is approximately $559,358. Consequently, debt service on the CIP Bonds will be well within the annual limits under the CIP Act. Details regarding the proposed terms of the CIP Bonds under this CIP are shown in Appendix A. The Bonds will be repaid over a 25-year period. The bond amount will not exceed the maximum principal amount of CIP Bonds referred to above. The City anticipates issuing bonds in the first half of 2025 with acquisition and construction of the projects to start thereafter. However, the City may delay the projects and the issuance of general obligation capital improvement bonds until subsequent years of this Plan and postpone the issuance of any general obligations, or issue any general obligation bonds in more than one Page 10 Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 series, so long as the total general obligation bonds so issued do not exceed the maximum amount authorized in this Plan. Page A-1 Error! Unknown document property name. 4927-3539-1255.1 APPENDIX A ESTIMATED CIP BOND TERMS Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 12/31/2025 ---- 12/31/2026 --253,976.92 253,976.92 12/31/2027 115,000.00 3.500%200,270.00 315,270.00 12/31/2028 115,000.00 3.550%196,216.25 311,216.25 12/31/2029 120,000.00 3.600%192,015.00 312,015.00 12/31/2030 125,000.00 3.600%187,605.00 312,605.00 12/31/2031 130,000.00 3.650%182,982.50 312,982.50 12/31/2032 135,000.00 3.700%178,112.50 313,112.50 12/31/2033 140,000.00 3.750%172,990.00 312,990.00 12/31/2034 145,000.00 3.850%167,573.75 312,573.75 12/31/2035 150,000.00 3.900%161,857.50 311,857.50 12/31/2036 155,000.00 4.000%155,832.50 310,832.50 12/31/2037 165,000.00 4.100%149,350.00 314,350.00 12/31/2038 170,000.00 4.200%142,397.50 312,397.50 12/31/2039 175,000.00 4.300%135,065.00 310,065.00 12/31/2040 185,000.00 4.350%127,278.75 312,278.75 12/31/2041 190,000.00 4.400%119,075.00 309,075.00 12/31/2042 200,000.00 4.450%110,445.00 310,445.00 12/31/2043 210,000.00 4.500%101,270.00 311,270.00 12/31/2044 220,000.00 4.550%91,540.00 311,540.00 12/31/2045 230,000.00 4.600%81,245.00 311,245.00 12/31/2046 240,000.00 4.650%70,375.00 310,375.00 12/31/2047 250,000.00 4.650%58,982.50 308,982.50 12/31/2048 260,000.00 4.700%47,060.00 307,060.00 12/31/2049 275,000.00 4.700%34,487.50 309,487.50 12/31/2050 290,000.00 4.750%21,137.50 311,137.50 12/31/2051 300,000.00 4.750%7,125.00 307,125.00 Total $4,690,000.00 -$3,346,265.67 $8,036,265.67 4909-7214-4663.1 CITY OF CORCORAN RESOLUTION NO. 2025-11 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (the “City”) as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01. The City is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, 475.521 (the “Act”) to prepare a capital improvement plan and carry out programs for financing certain capital improvements. The City may issue general obligation bonds pursuant to the Act to finance the cost of capital improvements described in the plan. 1.02. Before the approval of the Plan and issuance of any general obligation bonds under the Act, the City is required to hold a public hearing on the plan and issuance of the bonds. 1.03. Pursuant to the Act, the City has caused to be prepared a five-year capital improvement plan (the “Plan”), which describes certain capital improvements in the City for the years 2025 through 2029. 1.04. The City has determined that it is in its best interests to give preliminary approval to the issuance and sale of capital improvement bonds pursuant to the Act in the maximum principal amount of $4,700,000 (the “Bonds”), to finance a portion of the costs described in the Plan. 1.05. On this date, the Council held a public hearing on the Plan and the issuance of the Bonds, after publication in the City’s official newspaper of a notice of public hearing at least 14 days but no more than 28 days before the date of the public hearing. Section 2. Plan Approved. 2.01. The Council finds that the Plan will provide for certain capital improvements which serve the interests of the City as a whole. 2.02. The Plan is approved in the form on file in City Hall. 4909-7214-4663.1 Section 3. Bonds Authorized. 3.01. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the issuance of Bonds in the maximum principal amount of $4,700,000, in order to finance certain capital improvements described in the Plan, including costs of issuance of the Bonds, subject to further details regarding the sale of the Bonds to be set forth in a resolution to be considered by the City Council at a subsequent meeting. 3.02. If a petition requesting a vote on the issuance of the Bonds, signed by voters equal to 5% of the votes cast in the last municipal general election, is filed with the City Clerk within 30 days after the date of the public hearing, the City may issue the Bonds only after obtaining approval of a majority of voters voting on the question at an election. 3.03. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.356, subd. 2, the Council, by at least a two-thirds vote of all of its members, finds that the Plan and the improvements to be financed with the Bonds do not impact and do not have a relationship to the City’s comprehensive plan; the Plan and improvements are consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan; therefore, the Council dispenses with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.356, subd. 2 relating to planning commission review of the Plan and the improvements. 3.04 City staff are authorized and directed to take all other actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. Approved this 13th day of February, 2025, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota. CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ City Administrator 4897-5068-4951.1 Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall in the City on Thursday, February 13, 2025, commencing at 7:00 P.M. The following members of the Council were present: and the following were absent: * * * * * * * * * The following resolution was presented by Councilmember ____________ who moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-12 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF APPROXIMATELY $6,450,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2025A BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “City”) as follows: 1. Equipment Certificates. (a) The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, as amended, and Sections 410.32 and 412.301 (collectively, the “Equipment Act”), to issue its general obligation equipment certificates of indebtedness on such terms and in such manner as the City determines to finance the purchase of items of capital equipment, subject to certain limitations contained in the Equipment Act. (b) The City will purchase and acquire various items of capital equipment as authorized under the Equipment Act (the “Capital Equipment”). (c) As required by the Act: 4897-5068-4951.1 2 (i) the expected useful life of each item of Capital Equipment is or will be at least as long as the term of the equipment certificates issued to finance such Capital Equipment; and (ii) the principal amount of equipment certificates to be issued in the year 2025 will not exceed one-quarter of one percent (0.25%) of the estimated market value of taxable property in the City for the year 2025. (d) It is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue its general obligations in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $1,755,000 (the “Equipment Certificates”), pursuant to the Equipment Act to provide financing for the Capital Equipment. 2. CIP Bonds. (a) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, as amended, specifically Section 475.521 (the “CIP Act”), the City is authorized to finance certain capital improvements under an approved capital improvement plan by the issuance of general obligation bonds of the City payable from ad valorem taxes. Capital improvements include acquisition or betterment of public lands, buildings or other improvements for the purpose of a city hall, library, public safety facility and public works facilities (excluding light rail transit or any activity related to it, or a park, road, bridge, administrative building other than a city hall, or land for any of those activities). (b) On this same date, following a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted a capital improvement plan for years 2025 through 2029 (the “Capital Improvement Plan”) and approved the issuance of general obligation bonds thereunder, pursuant to the CIP Act. (c) The capital improvements described in the Capital Improvement Plan include but are not limited to the acquisition and preparation of land for new city hall and municipal facility in the City and the improvements to the City’s public works building including floor sealing and the acquisition and construction of a lean-to enclosure (the “Capital Improvement Project”). (d) It is necessary and desirable for the reduction of debt service costs to the City to issue general obligations in the approximate aggregate amount of $4,695,000, pursuant to the CIP Act, specifically Section 475.67, subdivision 3, to finance the Capital Improvement Project. 3. Sale of Bonds. (a) The City Council finds it necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City that the City issue its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A (the “Bonds”), in the proposed aggregate principal amount of $6,450,000, pursuant to the Equipment Act and the CIP Act (together, the “Act”), which amount is subject to adjustment in accordance with the official Notice of Sale attached hereto as EXHIBIT A (the “Notice of Sale”). The Bonds will be issued, sold, and delivered in accordance with the Notice of Sale. (b) The City is authorized by Section 475.60, subdivision 2(9) of the Act to negotiate the sale of the Bonds, it being determined that the City has retained an independent municipal advisor in connection with such sale. 4897-5068-4951.1 3 4. Authority of Municipal Advisor. Northland Securities, Inc. is authorized and directed to negotiate the Bonds in accordance with the Notice of Sale. The City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, March 27, 2025, to consider proposals on the Bonds and take any other appropriate action with respect to the Bonds. The actions of the City staff and the City’s municipal advisor in negotiating the sale of the Bonds are ratified and confirmed in all respects. 5. Authority of Bond Counsel. The law firm of Kutak Rock LLP, as bond counsel for the City, is authorized to act as bond counsel and to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents, certificates and instruments relating to the Bonds. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to assist Kutak Rock LLP in the preparation of such documents, certificates, and instruments. 6. Covenants. In the resolution awarding the sale of the Bonds the City Council will set forth the covenants and undertakings required by the Act. 7. Official Statement. In connection with the sale of the Bonds, the officers or employees of the City are authorized and directed to cooperate with Northland Securities, Inc. and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. 8. Reimbursements. The City has or may have incurred certain expenditures with respect to the Capital Improvement Project and the Capital Equipment that were financed temporarily from other sources but are expected to be reimbursed with proceeds of the Bonds. The City hereby declares its intent to reimburse certain costs of the Capital Improvement Project and the Capital Equipment from proceeds of the Bonds in an amount not to exceed $6,455,000 (the “Declaration”). This Declaration is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent for purposes of Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember _____________, and upon vote being taken thereon the following members voted in favor of the motion: and the following voted against: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 4897-5068-4951.1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) CITY OF CORCORAN ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Administrator of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on Thursday, February 13, 2025, with the original minutes on file in my office and the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes, insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of approximately $6,450,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A of the City. WITNESS My hand as City Administrator and the corporate seal of the City this ____ day of _________, 2025. City Administrator City of Corcoran, Minnesota (SEAL B-1 4897-5068-4951.1 Exhibit A NOTICE OF SALE $6,450,000 * GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2025A CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA (Book-Entry Only) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that these Bonds will be offered for sale according to the following terms: TIME AND PLACE: Proposals (also referred to herein as “bids”) will be opened by the City’s Administrator, or designee, on Thursday, March 27, 2025, at 10:00 A.M., CT, at the offices of Northland Securities, Inc. (the Issuer’s “Municipal Advisor”), 150 South 5th Street, Suite 3300, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402. Consideration of the Proposals for award of the sale will be by the City Council at its meeting at the City Offices beginning Thursday, March 27, 2025 at 7:00 P.M., CT. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals may be: a) submitted to the office of Northland Securities, Inc., b) emailed to PublicSale@northlandsecurities.com c) for proposals submitted prior to the sale, the final price and coupon rates may be submitted to Northland Securities, Inc. by telephone at 612-851-5900 or 612-851-4945, or d) submitted electronically. Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received via PARITY™, or its successor, in the manner described below, until 10:00 A.M., CT, on Thursday, March 27, 2025. Proposals may be submitted electronically via PARITY™ or its successor, pursuant to this Notice until 10:00 A.M., CT, but no Proposal will be received after the time for receiving Proposals specified above. To the extent any instructions or directions set forth in PARITY™, or its successor, conflict with this Notice, the terms of this Notice shall control. For further information about PARITY™, or its successor, potential bidders may contact Northland Securities, Inc. or i-Deal at 1359 Broadway, 2nd floor, New York, NY 10018, telephone 212-849-5021. Neither the Issuer nor Northland Securities, Inc. assumes any liability if there is a malfunction of PARITY™ or its successor. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the Issuer to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner in which the Proposal is submitted. * The Issuer reserves the right to increase or decrease the principal amount of the Bonds. Any such increase or decrease will be made in multiples of $5,000 and may be made in any maturity. If any maturity is adjusted, the purchase price will also be adjusted to maintain the same gross spread. A-2 4897-5068-4951.1 BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will be issued by means of a book-entry system with no physical distribution of bond certificates made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one bond certificate, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the Issuer through Northland Bond Services, a division of First National Bank of Omaha, Minneapolis, Minnesota (the “Paying Agent/Registrar”), to DTC, or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The successful bidder, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the bond certificates with DTC. The Issuer will pay reasonable and customary charges for the services of the Paying Agent/Registrar. DATE OF ORIGINAL ISSUE OF BONDS Date of Delivery (Estimated to be April 29, 2025) AUTHORITY/PURPOSE/SECURITY The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and Sections 475.521 and 412.301, as amended. Proceeds will be used to finance the City’s 2025 and 2026 equipment purchases, a land acquisition and preparation of the land for a new city hall/municipal facility, and to pay costs associated with the issuance of the Bonds. The Bonds are payable from ad valorem taxes on all taxable property within the City. The full faith and credit of the Issuer is pledged to their payment and the Issuer has validly obligated itself to levy ad valorem taxes in the event of any deficiency in the debt service account established for this issue. INTEREST PAYMENTS Interest is due semiannually on each February 1 and August 1, commencing February 1, 2026, to registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the Bond Register as of the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such interest payment date. MATURITIES Principal is due annually on February 1, inclusive, in each of the years and amounts as follows: A-3 4897-5068-4951.1 Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 2027 $265,000 2032 $315,000 2037 $165,000 2042 $200,000 2047 $250,000 2028 275,000 2033 325,000 2038 170,000 2043 210,000 2048 260,000 2029 285,000 2034 335,000 2039 175,000 2044 220,000 2049 270,000 2030 295,000 2035 345,000 2040 185,000 2045 230,000 2050 285,000 2031 300,000 2036 360,000 2041 190,000 2046 240,000 2051 300,000 Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for any combination of serial bonds and term bonds, subject to mandatory redemption, so long as the amount of principal maturing or subject to mandatory redemption in each year conforms to the maturity schedule set forth above. INTEREST RATES All rates must be in integral multiples of 1/20th or 1/8th of 1%. The rate for any maturity may not be more than 2.00% less than the rate for any preceding maturity. All Bonds of the same maturity must bear a single uniform rate from date of issue to maturity. ESTABLISHMENT OF ISSUE PRICE (HOLD-THE-OFFERING-PRICE RULE MAY APPLY – BIDS NOT CANCELLABLE) The winning bidder shall assist the Issuer in establishing the issue price of the Bonds and shall execute and deliver to the Issuer at closing an “issue price” or similar certificate setting forth the reasonably expected initial offering price to the public or the sales price or prices of the Bonds, together with the supporting pricing wires or equivalent communications, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, with such modifications as may be appropriate or necessary, in the reasonable judgment of the winning bidder, the Issuer and Bond Counsel. All actions to be taken by the Issuer under this Notice of Sale to establish the issue price of the Bonds may be taken on behalf of the Issuer by the Issuer’s Municipal Advisor and any notice or report to be provided to the Issuer may be provided to the Issuer’s Municipal Advisor. The Issuer intends that the provisions of Treasury Regulation Section 1.148-1(f)(3)(i) (defining “competitive sale” for purposes of establishing the issue price of the Bonds) will apply to the initial sale of the Bonds (the “competitive sale requirements”) because: (1) the Issuer shall disseminate this Notice of Sale to potential underwriters in a manner that is reasonably designed to reach potential underwriters; (2) all bidders shall have an equal opportunity to bid; (3) the Issuer may receive bids from at least three underwriters of municipal bonds who have established industry reputations for underwriting new issuances of municipal bonds; and (4) the Issuer anticipates awarding the sale of the Bonds to the bidder who submits a firm offer to purchase the Bonds at the highest price (or lowest cost), as set forth in this Notice of Sale. Any bid submitted pursuant to this Notice of Sale shall be considered a firm offer for the purchase of the Bonds, as specified in the bid. A-4 4897-5068-4951.1 In the event that the competitive sale requirements are not satisfied, the Issuer shall promptly so advise the winning bidder. The Issuer may then determine to treat the initial offering price to the public as of the award date of the Bonds as the issue price of each maturity by imposing on the winning bidder the Hold-the-Offering-Price Rule as described in the following paragraph (the “Hold-the-Offering-Price Rule”). Bids will not be subject to cancellation in the event that the Issuer determines to apply the Hold-the-Offering-Price Rule to the Bonds. Bidders should prepare their bids on the assumption that the Bonds will be subject to the Hold-the-Offering- Price Rule in order to establish the issue price of the Bonds. By submitting a bid, the winning bidder shall (i) confirm that the underwriters have offered or will offer the Bonds to the public on or before the date of award at the offering price or prices (the “Initial Offering Price”), or at the corresponding yield or yields, set forth in the bid submitted by the winning bidder and (ii) agree, on behalf of the underwriters participating in the purchase of the Bonds, that the underwriters will neither offer nor sell unsold Bonds of any maturity to which the Hold-the-Offering Price Rule shall apply to any person at a price that is higher than the Initial Offering Price to the public during the period starting on the award date for the Bonds and ending on the earlier of the following: (1) the close of the fifth (5th) business day after the award date; or (2) the date on which the underwriters have sold at least 10% of a maturity of the Bonds to the public at a price that is no higher than the Initial Offering Price to the public (the “10% Test”), at which time only that particular maturity will no longer be subject to the Hold- the-Offering-Price Rule. The Issuer acknowledges that, in making the representations set forth above, the winning bidder will rely on (i) the agreement of each underwriter to comply with the requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the Hold-the- Offering-Price Rule, if applicable to the Bonds, as set forth in an agreement among underwriters and the related pricing wires, (ii) in the event a selling group has been created in connection with the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, the agreement of each dealer who is a member of the selling group to comply with the requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the Hold-the-Offering-Price Rule, if applicable to the Bonds, as set forth in a selling group agreement and the related pricing wires, and (iii) in the event that an underwriter or dealer who is a member of the selling group is a party to a third-party distribution agreement that was employed in connection with the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, the agreement of each broker-dealer that is a party to such agreement to comply with the requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the Hold-the-Offering-Price Rule, if applicable to the Bonds, as set forth in the third-party distribution agreement and the related pricing wires. The Issuer further acknowledges that each underwriter shall be solely liable for its failure to comply with its agreement regarding the requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the Hold-the-Offering-Price Rule, if applicable to the Bonds, and that no underwriter shall be liable for the failure of any other underwriter, or of any dealer who is a member of a selling group, or of any broker-dealer that is a party to a third-party distribution agreement to comply with its corresponding agreement to comply with the requirements for A-5 4897-5068-4951.1 establishing issue price of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the Hold-the-Offering-Price Rule if applicable to the Bonds. By submitting a bid, each bidder confirms that: (i) any agreement among underwriters, any selling group agreement and each third-party distribution agreement (to which the bidder is a party) relating to the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, together with the related pricing wires, contains or will contain language obligating each underwriter, each dealer who is a member of the selling group, and each broker-dealer that is a party to such third-party distribution agreement, as applicable, (A) to comply with the Hold-the-Offering-Price Rule, if applicable if and for so long as directed by the winning bidder and as set forth in the related pricing wires, (B) to promptly notify the winning bidder of any sales of Bonds that to its knowledge, are made to a purchaser who is a related party to an underwriter participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public (each such term being used as defined below), and (C) to acknowledge that, unless otherwise advised by the underwriter, dealer or broker-dealer, the winning bidder shall assume that each order submitted by the underwriter, dealer or broker-dealer is a sale to the public, and (ii) any agreement among underwriters or selling group agreement relating to the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, together with the related pricing wires, contains or will contain language obligating each underwriter or dealer that is a party to a third-party distribution agreement to be employed in connection with the initial sale of the Bonds to the public to require each broker-dealer that is a party to such retail distribution agreement to comply with the Hold-the-Offering-Price Rule, if applicable, in each case if and for so long as directed by the winning bidder or the underwriter and as set forth in the related pricing wires. Notes: Sales of any Bonds to any person that is a related party to an underwriter participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public (each such term being used as defined below) shall not constitute sales to the public for purposes of this Notice of Sale. Further, for purposes of this Notice of Sale: (1) “public” means any person other than an underwriter or a related party, (2) “underwriter” means (A) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract with the Issuer (or with the lead underwriter to form an underwriting syndicate) to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public and (B) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract directly or indirectly with a person described in clause (A) to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public (including a member of a selling group or a party to a third-party distribution agreement participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public). (3) a purchaser of any of the Bonds is a “related party” to an underwriter if the underwriter and the purchaser are subject, directly or indirectly, to (A) more than 50% common ownership of the voting power or the total value of their stock, if both entities are corporations (including direct ownership by one corporation or another), (B) more than 50% common ownership of their capital interests or profits interests, if both entities are partnerships (including direct ownership by one partnership of another), or (C) more than 50% common ownership of the value of the outstanding stock of the corporation or the capital interests or profit interests of the partnership, as applicable, if one entity is a corporation and the other entity is a partnership (including direct ownership of the applicable stock or interests by one entity of the other), and A-6 4897-5068-4951.1 (4) “sale date” means the date that the Bonds are awarded by the Issuer to the winning bidder. ADJUSTMENTS TO PRINCIPAL AMOUNT AFTER PROPOSALS The Issuer reserves the right to increase or decrease the principal amount of the Bonds. Any such increase or decrease will be made in multiples of $5,000 and may be made in any maturity. If any maturity is adjusted, the purchase price will also be adjusted to maintain the same gross spread. Such adjustments shall be made promptly after the sale and prior to the award of Proposals by the Issuer and shall be at the sole discretion of the Issuer. The successful bidder may not withdraw or modify its Proposal once submitted to the Issuer for any reason, including post-sale adjustment. Any adjustment shall be conclusive and shall be binding upon the successful bidder. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION Bonds maturing on and after February 1, 2034 are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the Issuer on February 1, 2033 and any date thereafter, at a price of par plus accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the maturities and principal amounts within each maturity to be redeemed shall be determined by the Issuer and if only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment, the specific Bonds to be prepaid shall be chosen by lot by the Bond Registrar. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto shall constitute cause for a failure or refusal by the successful bidder thereof to accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds in accordance with terms of the purchase contract. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the successful bidder. DELIVERY Delivery of the Bonds will be within thirty-five days after award, subject to an approving legal opinion by Kutak Rock LLP, Bond Counsel. The legal opinion will be paid by the Issuer and delivery will be anywhere in the continental United States without cost to the successful bidder at DTC. TYPE OF PROPOSAL Proposals of not less than $6,632,925 (98.65%) and accrued interest on the principal sum of $6,450,000 must be filed with the undersigned prior to the time of sale. Proposals must be unconditional except as to legality. Proposals for the Bonds should be delivered to Northland Securities, Inc. and addressed to: Jay Tobin, City Administrator A-7 4897-5068-4951.1 Corcoran City Hall 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, Minnesota 55340 A good faith deposit (the “Deposit”) in the amount of $129,000 in the form of a federal wire transfer (payable to the order of the Issuer) is only required from the apparent winning bidder, and must be received within two hours after the time stated for the receipt of Proposals. The apparent winning bidder will receive notification of the wire instructions from the Municipal Advisor promptly after the sale. If the Deposit is not received from the apparent winning bidder in the time allotted, the Issuer may choose to reject their Proposal and then proceed to offer the Bonds to the next lowest bidder based on the terms of their original proposal, so long as said bidder wires funds for the Deposit amount within two hours of said offer. The Issuer will retain the Deposit of the successful bidder, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the successful bidder. In the event the successful bidder fails to comply with the accepted Proposal, said amount will be retained by the Issuer. No Proposal can be withdrawn after the time set for receiving Proposals unless the meeting of the Issuer scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The Issuer’s computation of the interest rate of each Proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. In the event of a tie, the sale of the Bonds will be awarded by lot. The Issuer will reserve the right to: (i) waive non-substantive informalities of any Proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of Proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all Proposals without cause, and (iii) reject any Proposal which the Issuer determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. INFORMATION FROM SUCCESSFUL BIDDER The successful bidder will be required to provide, in a timely manner, certain information relating to the initial offering price of the Bonds necessary to compute the yield on the Bonds pursuant to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. OFFICIAL STATEMENT By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a Proposal therefor, the Issuer agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded, the Final Official Statement in an electronic format as prescribed by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB). A-8 4897-5068-4951.1 FULL CONTINUING DISCLOSURE UNDERTAKING The Issuer will covenant in the resolution awarding the sale of the Bonds and in a Continuing Disclosure Undertaking to provide, or cause to be provided, annual financial information, including audited financial statements of the Issuer, and notices of certain material events, as required by SEC Rule 15c2-12. BANK QUALIFICATION The Issuer will designate the Bonds as qualified tax-exempt obligations for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. BOND INSURANCE AT UNDERWRITER’S OPTION If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the successful bidder, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the successful bidder of the Bonds. Any increase in the costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the successful bidder, except that, if the Issuer has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the Issuer will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the successful bidder. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after the Bonds have been awarded to the successful bidder shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the successful bidder to accept delivery on the Bonds. The Issuer reserves the right to reject any and all Proposals, to waive informalities and to adjourn the sale. Dated: February 13, 2025 BY ORDER OF THE CORCORAN CITY COUNCIL /s/ Jay Tobin City Administrator Additional information may be obtained from: Northland Securities, Inc. 150 South 5th Street, Suite 3300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone No.: 612-851-5900 A-9 4897-5068-4951.1 EXHIBIT A (ISSUE PRICE CERTIFICATE – COMPETITIVE SALE SATISFIED) ISSUE PRICE CERTIFICATE The undersigned, on behalf of [NAME OF UNDERWRITER] (“[UNDERWRITER]”), hereby certifies as set forth below with respect to the sale and issuance of the above-captioned obligations (the “Bonds”). 1. Initial Offering Price of the Bonds. (a) [UNDERWRITER] offered each Maturity of the Bonds to the Public for purchase at the respective initial offering prices listed in Schedule A (the “Initial Offering Prices”) on or before the Sale Date. A copy of the pricing wire or equivalent communication for the Bonds is attached to this certificate as Schedule B. (b) As set forth in the Notice of Sale and bid award, [UNDERWRITER] has agreed in writing that, (i) for each Maturity of the Bonds, it would neither offer nor sell any of the Bonds of such Maturity to any person at a price that is higher than the Initial Offering Price for such Maturity during the Holding Period for such Maturity (the “hold-the-offering-price rule”), and (ii) any selling group agreement shall contain the agreement of each dealer who is a member of the selling group, and any retail distribution agreement shall contain the agreement of each broker-dealer who is a party to the retail distribution agreement, to comply with the hold-the-offering-price rule. Pursuant to such agreement, no Underwriter (as defined below) has offered or sold any Maturity of the Bonds at a price that is higher than the respective Initial Offering Price for that Maturity of the Bonds during the Holding Period. 2. Defined Terms. (a) Holding Period means, for each Maturity of the Bonds, the period starting on the Sale Date and ending on the earlier of (i) the close of the fifth business day after the Sale Date (____________), or (ii) the date on which [UNDERWRITER] has sold at least 10% of such Maturity of the Bonds to the Public at prices that are no higher than the Initial Offering Price for such Maturity. (b) Issuer means the Economic Development Authority of the City of Becker, Minnesota. (c) Maturity means Bonds with the same credit and payment terms. Bonds with different maturity dates, or Bonds with the same maturity date but different stated interest rates, are treated as separate Maturities. (d) Public means any person (including an individual, trust, estate, partnership, association, company, or corporation) other than an Underwriter or a related party to an Underwriter. The term “related party” for purposes of this certificate generally means any two or more persons who have greater than 50 percent common ownership, directly or indirectly. (e) Sale Date means the first day on which there is a binding contract in writing for the sale of a Maturity of the Bonds. The Sale Date of the Bonds is ___________. (f) Underwriter means (i) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract with the Issuer (or with the lead underwriter to form an underwriting syndicate) to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public, and (ii) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract directly or indirectly with a person described in clause (i) of this paragraph to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public (including a member of a selling group or a party to a retail A-10 4897-5068-4951.1 distribution agreement participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public). The representations set forth in this certificate are limited to factual matters only. Nothing in this certificate represents [UNDERWRITER] interpretation of any laws, including specifically Sections 103 and 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury Regulations thereunder. The undersigned understands that the foregoing information will be relied upon by the Issuer with respect to certain of the representations set forth in the Tax Compliance Certificate and with respect to compliance with the federal income tax rules affecting the Bonds, and by Kutak Rock LLP in connection with rendering its opinion that the interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, the preparation of the Internal Revenue Service Form 8038-G, and other federal income tax advice that it may give to the Issuer from time to time relating to the Bonds. [UNDERWRITER] By:__________________________________ ____ Name:________________________________ ___ Dated: __________, 2025 A-11 4897-5068-4951.1 (ISSUE PRICE CERTIFICATE – HOLD THE PRICE) ISSUE PRICE CERTIFICATE The undersigned, on behalf of [NAME OF UNDERWRITER] (“[UNDERWRITER]”), hereby certifies as set forth below with respect to the sale of the above-captioned obligations (the “Bonds”). 1. Reasonably Expected Initial Offering Price. (a) As of the Sale Date, the reasonably expected initial offering prices of the Bonds to the Public by [UNDERWRITER] are the prices listed in Schedule A (the “Expected Offering Prices”). The Expected Offering Prices are the prices for the Maturities of the Bonds used by [SHORT NAME OF UNDERWRITER] in formulating its bid to purchase the Bonds. Attached as Schedule B is a true and correct copy of the bid provided by [UNDERWRITER] to purchase the Bonds. (b) [UNDERWRITER] was not given the opportunity to review other bids prior to submitting its bid. (c) The bid submitted by [UNDERWRITER] constituted a firm offer to purchase the Bonds. 2. Defined Terms. (a) Maturity means Bonds with the same credit and payment terms. Bonds with different maturity dates, or Bonds with the same maturity date but different stated interest rates, are treated as separate Maturities. (b) Public means any person (including an individual, trust, estate, partnership, association, company, or corporation) other than an Underwriter or a related party to an Underwriter. The term “related party” for purposes of this certificate generally means any two or more persons who have greater than 50 percent common ownership, directly or indirectly. (c) Sale Date means the first day on which there is a binding contract in writing for the sale of a Maturity of the Bonds. The Sale Date of the Bonds is ____________. (d) Underwriter means (i) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract with the Issuer (or with the lead underwriter to form an underwriting syndicate) to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public, and (ii) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract directly or indirectly with a person described in clause (i) of this paragraph to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public (including a member of a selling group or a party to a retail distribution agreement participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public). The representations set forth in this certificate are limited to factual matters only. Nothing in this certificate represents [UNDERWRITER]’s interpretation of any laws, including specifically Sections 103 and 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury Regulations thereunder. The undersigned understands that the foregoing information will be relied upon by the Issuer with respect to certain of the representations set forth in the Tax Compliance Certificate and with respect to compliance with the federal income tax rules affecting the Bonds, and by Kutak Rock LLP in connection with rendering its opinion that the interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, the preparation of the Internal Revenue Service Form 8038-G, and other federal income tax advice that it may give to the Issuer from time to time relating to the Bonds. [UNDERWRITER] A-12 4897-5068-4951.1 By:__________________________________ ____ Name:________________________________ ___ Dated: ___________, 2025 2025 CITY OF CORCORAN APRIL S M T W T F S 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MAY S M T W T F S 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JUNE S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 JULY S M T W T F S 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AUGUST S M T W T F S 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 SEPTEMBER S M T W T F S 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 OCTOBER S M T W T F S 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NOVEMBER S M T W T F S 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 DECEMBER S M T W T F S 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Meetings Mayor Contracted Services Council Tom McKee tmckee@corcoranmn.gov Planning 612-638-0225 Council Quarterly Work Sess. Council Members Engineer 763-479-4209 Planning Commission Michelle R. Friedrich michelle.friedrich@corcoranmn.gov Building Inspector 763-479-1720 Parks & Trails Commissions Mark Lanterman mlanterman@corcoranmn.gov City Assessor 612-348-2943 City Holiday Jeremy Nichols jnichols@corcoranmn.gov Septic / Henn Co. 612-543-5200 Alternative Meeting Dates Dean Vehrenkamp dvehrenkamp@corcoranmn.gov Republic Services 763-972-3335 JANUARY S M T W T F S 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FEBRUARY S M T W T F S 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MARCH S M T W T F S 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 City of Corcoran 2025 City Council Schedule (as of February 7, 2025) Below is a tentative schedule for City Council meetings subject to change. February 13, 2025 February 21-22, 2025 Elected Leaders Institute – Foundational/Advanced Program (Plymouth) February 27, 2025 March 13, 2025 March 27, 2025 April 10, 2025 April 24, 2025 May 8, 2025 May 22, 2025 June 12, 2025 June 23, 2025* (TBD – Moved for League of Minnesota Cities Conference) (NOTE: Monday) June 25-27, 2025 League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference (Duluth) July 10, 2025 July 24, 2025 August 14, 2025 August 28, 2025 September 11, 2025 September 25, 2025 October 9, 2025 October 16, 2025 November 13, 2025 November 24, 2025* (NOTE: Monday) December 11, 2025