Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2024-12-12 City Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda December 12, 2024, 7:00 pm a. NAL 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval 4. Presentations a. Recognition of Outgoing Councilmember Jon Bottema 5. Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6. Consent Agenda a. November 25, 2024 DRAFT City Council Minutes b. Financial Claims – December 12, 2024 c. Police Department Staffing d. CIP Squad Car Order e. K-9 Balistic Vest f. REVISED Old Farm Ridge PP, FP, VAR (City File 24-034) g. NE Industrial Park EAW (City File 24-010) h. 2025 Fee Schedule i. Chisholm Trail – Street Improvements j. Proposed Social Media Policy k. MOA(s) with Teamsters: Scheduling and HSA Contribution l. REVISED Waste Hauler Renewals m. CR-10 & Brockton Lane Turn Lane Improvements – Pay Request 2 & FINAL n. Water Tower – Change Order 2 o. NE Trunk Infrastructure Pay Request 4 p. Stieg Road Improvements – Pay Request 5 q. Water Treatment Plant – Change Order 5 r. Water Treatment Plant – Change Order 6 s. Water Treatment Plant – Pay Request 19 t. Water Tower Pay Request 20 u. City Center Drive & 79th Place – Change Order 2 & Pay Request 6 & FINAL v. Resolution 2024-132 Honoring Outgoing Councilmember Jon Bottema w. REVISED Police Department Taser Replacement x. ADDED Resolution 2024-136 Appointments of Positions for the City of Corcoran y. ADDED Parks and Trails Commissioner Resignation 7. Unfinished Business a. Cannabis Regulations Update 8. New Business a. Public Hearing – St. Therese Liquor License Application b. Public Hearing – Truth in Taxation (2025 Budget and Levy, Wage Schedule) c. REVISED 2025 Utility Budgets d. MS4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) e. ADDED DRAFT Capital Improvement Plan 9. Closed Session a. ADDED Response to Lawsuit b. ADDED Potential Property Acquisition c. City Administrator Annual Review HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Council meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 821 6350 4979 Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82163504979 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 821 6350 4979 *Please note in-person comments will be taken at the scheduled meeting where noted. Comments received via email to City Administrator Tobin at jtobin@corcoranmn.gov or via public comment cards will also be accepted. All email and public comment cards must be received by the Wednesday prior to scheduled Council meeting. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov Corcoran City Council Agenda December 12, 2024, 7:00 pm 10. Council Reports 11. 2024-2025 City Council Schedule 12. Adjournment City of Corcoran City Council Minutes November 25, 2024 1 The Corcoran City Council met on November 25, 2024, in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City Council meeting was held in person and the public was present in person and remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Lanterman, Councilor Nichols, and Councilor Vehrenkamp were present. City Administrator Tobin, Assistant City Administrator Williams, City Clerk Johnson,City Attorney Thames, Community Development Director Davis McKeown, Planner Klingbeil, and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk were present. OIGINAL 1. Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor McKee called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. 2. Pledge of Allegiance Mayor McKee invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Agenda Approval City Administrator Tobin stated that item 7b was revised and item 12 was removed from the agenda. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Bottema to approve the agenda as amended. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Lanterman, Nichols and Vehrenkamp. (Motion carries: 5:0) 4. Presentations – None 5. Open Forum - Public Commonet Opportunity City Administrator Tobin invited residents to communicate in-person during Open Forum for items not included on the agenda. No Public Comments. 6. Consent Agenda a. November 14, 2024 DRAFT City Council Minutes Action - Approved October 14, 2024 City Council Minutes. b. Financial Claims, November 25, 2024 Action – Authorized Financial Claims for November 14, 2024. c. New Construction Escrow Code Amendment and Policy Action – Adopted Ordinance 2024-536 Amending the Text of Chapter 40 of the Corcoran City Code related to New Home Construction Escrow, Summary Ordinance 2024-537 for Publication and Resolution 2024-123 New Construction Escrow Policy and Findings of Fact. d. Pioneer Trail Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Action – Adopted Resolution 2024-124 Approving the Final PUD and Resolution 2024-125 approving the Final Plat and Development Contact. e. Tonka Auto Center SPA CUP IUP Action – Adopted Resolution 2024-125 Approving a Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Amendment for Tonka Auto Center at 20201 County Road 50 and Resolution 2024-127 Approving Interim Use Permit For Reduced Parking Requirements For The Property Located at 20201 County Road 50. City of Corcoran City Council Minutes November 25, 2024 2 f. See My Legacy and Park Enhancement Program Action – Approved proceeding with See My Legacy in 2025 using funds from Recreation Operating Supplies. g. Draft 2024 Fee Schedule Action – Accepted the Fee Schedule as Drafted. h. Tort Liability Coverage Waiver Action – Approved Liability Coverage Waiver. i. Financial Audit Firm Selection Action – Authorized the City Administrator to enter a one (1) year $36,000 contract with Schlenner Wenner & Company to provide audit services for the year ending December 31, 2024. j. Resolution 2024-128 Delegating Authority for Paying Certain Claims Action – Adopted 2024-128 Delegating Authority for Paying Certain Claims. k. City Center Drive & 17th Place Utility & Street Improvements – Pay Request 7 Action – Approved Pay Request #7 for Street and Utility Construction for City Center Drive and 79th Place to S.M. Hentges & Sons in the amount of $541,766.33. l. Stieg Road Improvements – Pay Request 14 Action – Approved Pay Request #4 for the Stieg Road Improvements project to Fehn Companies, Inc. in the amount of $102,911.57. m. Horeshoe Bend Draining Improvements – Pay Request 3 & FINAL Action – Approved final pay request for Horseshore Bend Drive Drainage Improvements Project to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. for $13,907.67. n. Water Tower – Pay Request 19 Action – Approved Pay Application #19 for the Corcoran Water Tower Project to Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors in the amount of $474,667.50 for work completed from October 16, 2024 through November 4, 2024. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Vehrenkamp to approve consent agenda items 6a and 6c- 6n. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Lanterman, Nichols and Vehrenkamp. (Motion carries: 5:0) MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Bottema to approve consent agenda item 6b. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Lanterman, Nichols and Vehrenkamp (Motion carries 5:0) 7. Unfinished Business a. Compensation and Classification Study Update City Administrator Tobin gave an update on the Compensation and Classification Study. Council provided feedback and authorized staff to move ahead wth the proposed strategy regarding comparable cities for proper market rate analysis in the Compensation and Classification Study. b. DRAFT 2025 Budget Review City Administrator Tobin gave a review of the Draft 2025 Budget. Council provided feedback. The final 2025 Budget approval and Truth-in-Taxation Hearing will take place at the December 12, 2024 Council Meeting. City of Corcoran City Council Minutes November 25, 2024 3 8. New Business a. Cannabis Business Regulation Staff provided a Draft Ordinance amending Chapter 119: Cannabis, Edible Cannabinoids, and Drug Paraphernalia and Title X: Zoning Ordinance for review. City Attorney Thames gave an informational overview of the state regulations and provided and update from the Office of Cannabis Management. Community Development Director Davis McKeown also provided information on zoning and suggested regulations. Council asked questions, discussed and provided staff with direction. MOTION: McKee moved, Nichols seconded to move item 9a ahead of item 8b in the agenda. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Lanterman and Vehrenkamp (Motion carries 5:0) 9. Planning a. Norling OS&P Concept City Planner, Klingbeil gave a staff report on a concept plan for the proposed subdivision of the parcel located at 6700 Pioneer Trail. Applicant, Rob Norling, also addressed the Council. The Council reviewed, discussed and provided staff and the applicant with feedback. Mayor McKee called a 5-minute Recess at 9:06 p.m. Councilor Lanterman was excused from the meeting. Mayor McKee called the Council meeting back to order at 9:12 p.m. 8. New Business (continued) b. Bellwether Boardwalk Design City Administrator Tobin gave the presentation on behalf of Public Works Director Mattson. He shared feedback solicited by the Parks and Trails Commission on November 21st, 2024 and provided their recommendation. Council directed staff to move forward with the project choosing design example #2. c. Former Cropland Seeding City Administrator Tobin gave the presentation on behalf of Public Works Director Mattson. MOTION: Bottema moved, Nichols seconded approve evaluation of Fields 1, 2 and 3 and work with agency partners for eligible grant programs as recommended by the Parks and Trails Commission. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols and Vehrenkamp (Motion carries 4:0) d. Winter Trail Maintenance City Administrator Tobin gave a presentation on behalf of Public works Director Mattson. Staff shared the feedback and recommendations provided from the Parks and Trails City of Corcoran City Council Minutes November 25, 2024 4 Commission on November 21st. Council discussed policy recommendations and funding options and provided staff with direction. 9. Planning (continued) b. Commercial Industrial Revised Work Plan MOTION: Bottema moved, Vehrenkamp seconded to authorize the revised work plan and direct staff on the use of similar situation (or “comparable” cities) for the purposes of completing the Comprehensive review of Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts. 10. Council Reports a. Planning Project Update 11. 2024 City Council Schedule 12. Closed Session - REMOVED 13. Adjournment MOTION: made by Nichols seconded by Bottema to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols and Vehrenkamp (Motion carries 4:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:39 p.m. November 25, 2024. Respectfully submitted, _____________________________________ Debra Johnson – City Clerk STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6b Council Meeting December 12, 2024 Prepared By Reed Kottke, Accountant Topic Financial Claims to December 12, 2024 Action Required Review and Approval Summary Claims require Council review and approval, those permitted per policy have been completed, while others are pending for Council approval. Financial/Budget Claims are within budget or are identified on a case-by-case basis to confirm funding source and seek Council approvals as necessary. Options 1.Approve claims as presented. 2.Amend and approve claims. Recommendation Approve claims as presented. Council Action Consider approving claims as presented. Attachments 1.Claims approved and processed per policy 2.Claims pending Council approval Check Range: 36208-36232 Financial Claims 61,438.43$ -$ 61,438.43$ Check Register (See register for financial claims) Automatic Deduction (EFT) Total Expenditures For Approval Agenda Item: 6b 1 Council Meeting: 12/12/2024 CLAIMS APPROVED AND PROCESSED PER POLICY Prepared By: Reed Kottke, Accountant BANK CODE: GEN CHECK DATE: 11/26/2024 INVOICE PAY DATE FROM 11/26/2024 TO 11/26/2024 11/26/2024 02:15 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran Page: 1/1CHECK PROOF FOR CITY OF CORCORAN # InvoicesTotal AmountCredit TotalInvoice TotalVendor NameVendor CodeCheck #BankCheck Date 140.74 0.00 40.74 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 115236208GEN11/26/2024 1176.54 0.00 176.54 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 115236209GEN11/26/2024 21,096.70 0.00 1,096.70 COMCAST - 002320219336210GEN11/26/2024 2594.53 0.00 594.53 COMCAST - 930899035302536211GEN11/26/2024 2259.32 0.00 259.32 COMCAST 0044893299736212GEN11/26/2024 4740.92 0.00 740.92 LANO EQUIPMENT10936213GEN11/26/2024 130.00 0.00 30.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES19136214GEN11/26/2024 150.00 0.00 50.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES19136215GEN11/26/2024 150.00 0.00 50.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES19136216GEN11/26/2024 130.00 0.00 30.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES19136217GEN11/26/2024 2500.00 0.00 500.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TRST159436218GEN11/26/2024 15,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 M KARINIEMI & K KARINIEMIREFUNDBD36219GEN11/26/2024 31,410.53 0.00 1,410.53 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS24236220GEN11/26/2024 1395.00 0.00 395.00 NORTHERN DEWATERING, INC. 306936221GEN11/26/2024 1834,913.98 0.00 34,913.98 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES170836222GEN11/26/2024 1339.22 0.00 339.22 T-MOBILE143336223GEN11/26/2024 1339.22 0.00 339.22 T-MOBILE143336224GEN11/26/2024 169.55 0.00 69.55 T-MOBILE143336225GEN11/26/2024 169.55 0.00 69.55 T-MOBILE143336226GEN11/26/2024 112,692.05 0.00 12,692.05 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT184436227GEN11/26/2024 11,196.48 0.00 1,196.48 XCEL ENERGY15836228GEN11/26/2024 11,029.86 0.00 1,029.86 XCEL ENERGY15836229GEN11/26/2024 117.84 0.00 17.84 XCEL ENERGY15836230GEN11/26/2024 125.44 0.00 25.44 XCEL ENERGY15836231GEN11/26/2024 1370.96 0.00 370.96 XCEL ENERGY15836232GEN11/26/2024 Num Stubs: 0Num Checks: 25 Num Invoices: 51 Total Amount: 61,438.43 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 1/4Page: 11/26/2024 02:30 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/26/2024 - 11/26/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36208 3620817.10 11/26/2420241106CITY HALL/CITY PARK GAS CHARGES 9/30-10/29 8000014143-4CENTERPOINT ENERGY 11/25/24100-41900-50380 3620823.64 11/26/2420241106CITY HALL/CITY PARK GAS CHARGES 9/30-10/29 8000014143-4CENTERPOINT ENERGY 11/25/24100-45200-50380 40.74 Total For Check 36208 Check 36209 36209176.54 11/26/2420241031PUBLIC WORKS GAS CHARGES 9/30-10/29 9884559-7CENTERPOINT ENERGY 11/25/24100-43100-50380 176.54 Total For Check 36209 Check 36210 36210274.17 11/26/2420241005CITY HALL/POLICE INTERNET 10/15-11/14COMCAST - 002320211/25/24100-41900-50321 36210274.17 11/26/2420241105CITY HALL/POLICE INTERNET 11/15-12/14COMCAST - 002320211/25/24100-41900-50321 36210274.18 11/26/2420241005CITY HALL/POLICE INTERNET 10/15-11/14COMCAST - 002320211/25/24100-42100-50321 36210274.18 11/26/2420241105CITY HALL/POLICE INTERNET 11/15-12/14COMCAST - 002320211/25/24100-42100-50321 1,096.70 Total For Check 36210 Check 36211 36211295.05 11/26/24219828543PW INTERNET OCT 2024COMCAST - 93089903511/25/24100-43100-50380 36211299.48 11/26/24222388781PW INTERNET NOV 2024COMCAST - 93089903511/25/24100-43100-50380 594.53 Total For Check 36211 Check 36212 36212129.66 11/26/24202410059100 CO RD 19 PHONE SERVICES 10/10-11/09COMCAST 004489311/25/24100-43100-50321 36212129.66 11/26/24202411059100 CO RD 19 PHONE SERVICES 11/10-12/09COMCAST 004489311/25/24100-43100-50321 259.32 Total For Check 36212 Check 36213 36213300.00 11/26/2403-1102262WACKER TRENCH ROLLER QTY 1LANO EQUIPMENT11/22/24100-43100-50210 36213114.81 11/26/2403-1109499BPA TEE OIL NAP HYDRAULIC HOSE & GUARDLANO EQUIPMENT11/22/24100-43100-50220 36213156.12 11/26/2403-1101203TOR PIN LYNCH/HOC QTY 6LANO EQUIPMENT11/22/24100-45200-50210 36213169.99 11/26/2403-1117173TOR FORK CASTER QTY 1LANO EQUIPMENT11/22/24100-45200-50210 740.92 Total For Check 36213 Check 36214 3621430.00 11/26/244122912024 FALL FORUMS MARK LANTERMANLEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES11/25/24100-41110-50207 30.00 Total For Check 36214 Check 36215 3621550.00 11/26/24412235APMP CONFERENCE QTY 1LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES11/25/24100-41400-50207 50.00 Total For Check 36215 Check 36216 3621650.00 11/26/244119292024 PSHRA MN DUES R GANNERLEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES11/25/24100-41400-50433 50.00 Total For Check 36216 Check 36217 3621730.00 11/26/244120452024 FALL FORUMS NALISHA WILLIAMSLEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES11/25/24100-41400-50207 30.00 Total For Check 36217 Check 36218 36218425.10 11/26/2423399WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM 00509595LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TRST11/25/24100-42100-50365 3621874.90 11/26/2423529WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM 00509595LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TRST11/25/24100-42100-50365 500.00 Total For Check 36218 Check 36219 362195,000.00 11/26/24BP24-0066KARINIEMI ESCROW REFUNDM KARINIEMI & K KARINIEMI11/26/24100-00000-22205 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 2/4Page: 11/26/2024 02:30 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/26/2024 - 11/26/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36219 5,000.00 Total For Check 36219 Check 36220 36220160.06 11/26/2444367625MV4 WEAR REC BM QTY 3MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS11/25/24100-43121-50224 36220325.95 11/26/2444180718MV4 WEAR REC BMMARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS11/25/24100-43121-50224 36220924.52 11/26/2443977722RIP RAP QTY 11 CITY HALLMARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS11/25/24100-45200-50530 1,410.53 Total For Check 36220 Check 36221 36221395.00 11/26/2443849PUMP RENTAL 20240906NORTHERN DEWATERING, INC. 11/25/24100-43100-50225 395.00 Total For Check 36221 Check 36222 36222158.00 11/26/242299549JAY BROWN CUP 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 36222316.00 11/26/242299546DOMINOS BP24-0039 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 362221,562.60 11/26/242299538HEATHER MEADOWS BP24-0048 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 3622217,062.80 11/26/242299526HOPE COMMUNITY BP24-0037 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 3622265.20 11/26/242299539KARINIEMI ORCHARDS BY24-0034 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 362221,085.60 11/26/242299548MJ VINEYARDS BP24-0045 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 36222945.00 11/26/242299523PIONEER TRL IND PARK BP23-0051 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 36222628.66 11/26/242299528RED BARN PET RETREAT BP23-0017 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 36222844.45 11/26/242299529ST THERESE BP22-0031 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 36222508.80 11/26/242299547SLABAUGH LOT BP24-0044 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 36222383.60 11/26/242299541SCHUTTE REZONING BP24-0049 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 3622246.65 11/26/242299545-2SUNRAM BP23-0024 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 36222253.35 11/26/242299545SUNRAM BP23-0032 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 36222468.70 11/26/242299540-2UPWARD ACRES BP24-0029 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 362221,382.55 11/26/242299540UPWARD ACRES BP24-0047 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 362223,002.23 11/26/242299524WALCOTT GLENN BP22-0043 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 362225,607.89 11/26/242299536WOODLAND HILLS BP24-0033 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205 36222591.90 11/26/242299525AMBERLY (1,2) BELLWETHER (6,7,9) 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES11/22/24100-00000-22205-087 34,913.98 Total For Check 36222 Check 36223 36223339.22 11/26/2420240921PW CELL SERVICE 8/21-9/20T-MOBILE11/25/24100-43100-50321 339.22 Total For Check 36223 Check 36224 36224339.22 11/26/2420241021PW CELL SERVICE 9/21-10/20T-MOBILE11/25/24100-43100-50321 339.22 Total For Check 36224 Check 36225 3622569.55 11/26/2420241016PW CELL SERVICE 9/16-10/15 X6449T-MOBILE11/25/24100-43100-50321 69.55 Total For Check 36225 Check 36226 3622669.55 11/26/2420240916PW CELL SERVICE 8/16-9/15 X6449T-MOBILE11/25/24100-43100-50321 69.55 Total For Check 36226 Check 36227 3622712,692.05 11/26/2435031729207ELECTRIC SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2024WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT11/26/24100-41900-50381 12,692.05 Total For Check 36227 Check 36228 362281,196.48 11/26/248995509459100 CO RD 19 PW 9/21-10/20 51-0868053-1XCEL ENERGY11/25/24100-43100-50381 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 3/4Page: 11/26/2024 02:30 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/26/2024 - 11/26/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36228 1,196.48 Total For Check 36228 Check 36229 362291,029.86 11/26/249036631429100 CO RD 19 PW 10/20-11/18 51-0868053-1XCEL ENERGY11/25/24100-43100-50381 1,029.86 Total For Check 36229 Check 36230 3623017.84 11/26/249006451809820 CO RD 101 9/29-10/28 51-0012787370-8XCEL ENERGY11/25/24601-49400-50381 17.84 Total For Check 36230 Check 36231 3623125.44 11/26/249013947909700 CO RD 19 10/03-11/03 51-0011102968-9XCEL ENERGY11/25/24100-43100-50381 25.44 Total For Check 36231 Check 36232 36232370.96 11/26/24901358477BELLWETHER STREET LIGHTS 11/04 51-5559590-1XCEL ENERGY11/25/24100-00000-22205 370.96 Total For Check 36232 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 4/4Page: 11/26/2024 02:30 PM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/26/2024 - 11/26/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number 61,420.59 Fund 100 GENERAL FUND 17.84 Fund 601 WATER Fund Totals: 61,438.43 Total For All Funds: Check Range: 36233-36277 Financial Claims 3,169,974.62$ 226,531.92$ 3,396,506.54$ Date Vendor Amount Description 11/21/2024 FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL 12.00$ Wire fee 11/22/2024 ADP PAYROLL FEES 508.41$ Payroll processing fee 11/15/2024 payroll 11/27/2024 ADP NET PAY 107,113.66$ Net wages payable 11/29/2024 payroll 11/27/2024 ADP TAX WITHHOLDING 33,937.75$ Tax withholding 11/29/2024 payroll 12/2/2024 HEALTHPARTNERS 37,605.43$ December health insurance premiums 12/2/2024 METLIFE 1,308.73$ December dental insurance premiums 12/3/2024 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 3,033.18$ Biweekly deferred compensation 457/roth contributions 11/29/2024 payroll 12/3/2024 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 4,932.65$ Biweekly HCSP contributions 11/29/2024 payroll 12/3/2024 OPTUM FINANCIAL 4,616.84$ Biweekly HSA contributions 11/29/2024 payroll 12/3/2024 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF MN 28,663.25$ Biweekly employee pension contributions 11/29/2024 payroll 12/4/2024 THE HARTFORD 1,860.04$ November disability premiums 12/4/2024 THE HARTFORD 1,794.76$ December disability premiums 12/4/2024 CIGNA 524.62$ November ancillary health insurance premiums 12/4/2024 CIGNA 620.60$ December ancillary health insurance premiums Total 226,531.92$ Automatic Deduction / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursement Check Register (See register for financial claims) Automatic Deduction (EFT) Total Expenditures For Approval Agenda Item: 6b 2 Council Meeting: 12/12/2024 CLAIMS PENDING COUNCIL APPROVAL Prepared By: Reed Kottke, Accountant BANK CODE: GEN CHECK DATE: 12/12/2024 INVOICE PAY DATE FROM 12/12/2024 TO 12/12/2024 12/05/2024 08:46 AM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran Page: 1/2CHECK PROOF FOR CITY OF CORCORAN # InvoicesTotal AmountCredit TotalInvoice TotalVendor NameVendor CodeCheck #BankCheck Date 1130.57 0.00 130.57 ADAMS PEST CONTROL, INC.98736233GEN12/12/2024 213,387.05 0.00 3,387.05 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES227036234GEN12/12/2024 113,752.61 0.00 13,752.61 CENTRAL SQUARE TECHNOLOGIES251736235GEN12/12/2024 157,015.00 0.00 57,015.00 CITY OF SARTELL317836236GEN12/12/2024 443,499.15 0.00 43,499.15 COMPASS MINERALS211336237GEN12/12/2024 2141.00 0.00 141.00 CUSTOM DOOR SALES INC149036238GEN12/12/2024 11,004.25 0.00 1,004.25 DEHMER FIRE PROTECTION28636239GEN12/12/2024 1276.15 0.00 276.15 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS, INC.214136240GEN12/12/2024 1260.00 0.00 260.00 EVERGREEN RECYCLING LLCMISC36241GEN12/12/2024 3674,017.29 0.00 674,017.29 FEHN COMPANIES186836242GEN12/12/2024 11,674.10 0.00 1,674.10 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518190436243GEN12/12/2024 1802.37 0.00 802.37 FIRST ARRIVING IO, INC311636244GEN12/12/2024 11,386.00 0.00 1,386.00 FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING, LLC27836245GEN12/12/2024 115.98 0.00 15.98 GRAINGER17036246GEN12/12/2024 1750.00 0.00 750.00 GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO178736247GEN12/12/2024 120,103.27 0.00 20,103.27 CITY OF HANOVER5736248GEN12/12/2024 2770.25 0.00 770.25 HASSAN SAND & GRAVEL301036249GEN12/12/2024 14,521.00 0.00 4,521.00 HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES LL196936250GEN12/12/2024 1350.00 0.00 350.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES19136251GEN12/12/2024 1980.00 0.00 980.00 M KARINIEMI & K KARINIEMIMISC36252GEN12/12/2024 131.98 0.00 31.98 MENARDS MAPLE GROVE16736253GEN12/12/2024 2132,216.62 0.00 132,216.62 METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES11736254GEN12/12/2024 159,043.60 0.00 59,043.60 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL137536255GEN12/12/2024 159.14 0.00 59.14 MORONEY, RONSREFUNDUB36256GEN12/12/2024 515,097.93 0.00 15,097.93 NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT175936257GEN12/12/2024 3168.74 0.00 168.74 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC13036258GEN12/12/2024 193,161.97 0.00 93,161.97 OMANN CONTRACTING COMPANIES178436259GEN12/12/2024 1128,749.92 0.00 128,749.92 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES289836260GEN12/12/2024 22,885.00 0.00 2,885.00 PATNODE ELECTRIC152136261GEN12/12/2024 2490,996.10 0.00 490,996.10 PHOENIX FABRICATORS & ERECTORS, LLC308036262GEN12/12/2024 11,863.28 0.00 1,863.28 PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY265536263GEN12/12/2024 1425.97 0.00 425.97 QUADIENT LEASING USA INC292736264GEN12/12/2024 1547,507.97 0.00 547,507.97 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP308536265GEN12/12/2024 183,089.27 0.00 83,089.27 CITY OF ROGERS22936266GEN12/12/2024 183,269.27 0.00 83,269.27 CITY OF ROGERS22936267GEN12/12/2024 2464.61 0.00 464.61 RTL EQUIPMENT304136268GEN12/12/2024 1500.50 0.00 500.50 SITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY217036269GEN12/12/2024 1423,985.36 0.00 423,985.36 SR WEIDEMA193936270GEN12/12/2024 24269,195.87 0.00 269,195.87 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES170836271GEN12/12/2024 148.99 0.00 48.99 STREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT14836272GEN12/12/2024 1250.00 0.00 250.00 SUPERIOR FORD25836273GEN12/12/2024 1174.55 0.00 174.55 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY32836274GEN12/12/2024 347,511.94 0.00 7,511.94 U.S. BANK292836275GEN12/12/2024 24,400.00 0.00 4,400.00 UTILITY LOGIC261736276GEN12/12/2024 BANK CODE: GEN CHECK DATE: 12/12/2024 INVOICE PAY DATE FROM 12/12/2024 TO 12/12/2024 12/05/2024 08:46 AM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran Page: 2/2CHECK PROOF FOR CITY OF CORCORAN # InvoicesTotal AmountCredit TotalInvoice TotalVendor NameVendor CodeCheck #BankCheck Date 140.00 0.00 40.00 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE15636277GEN12/12/2024 Num Stubs: 0Num Checks: 45 Num Invoices: 139 Total Amount: 3,169,974.62 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 1/7Page: 12/05/2024 09:07 AM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/27/2024 - 12/12/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36233 36233130.57 12/12/244022371CITY HALL PEST CONTROLADAMS PEST CONTROL, INC.11/08/24100-41900-50401 130.57 Total For Check 36233 Check 36234 36234719.94 12/12/241X7M-WLQH-CDDMLOGITECH COMBO TOUCH DETACHABLE 10TH GEN IPAD KEYBOARD CASE W/LARGE PRECISION TRACKPADAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES06/06/24100-41110-50207 3623443.65 12/12/241J96-QMMG-4VXKSPACE HEATER, ACRYLIC WINDOW SIGNAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES11/20/24100-41400-50207 36234135.86 12/12/241KNJ-XLTY-1W1WADJUSTABLE LAPTOP STAND, PRIVACY SCREEN FILTERAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES10/04/24100-41400-50207 3623473.75 12/12/241NGK-Q737-CWW4FOLDERS, WIRE CADDY, SMALL PLASTIC STORAGE BINSAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES09/10/24100-41400-50207 3623414.84 12/12/241P6M-HVCC-9KY9HEAVY DUTY SILVERWARE-CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY FORKSAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES08/28/24100-41400-50207 3623475.30 12/12/241WGF-VYRP-RFQVPENS, RUBBER BANDS, SD CARD READER, HANGING FILE ORGANIZERAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES10/23/24100-41400-50207 36234500.62 12/12/24147L-4LYV-HPJ6TOILET PAPER, TRASH BAGS, CURTAIN ROD, CURTAINS, DOG BOWL, DISINFECTING WIPES AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES10/14/24100-41900-50210 3623460.77 12/12/241L6P-3TNV-M7VJBACKDROP CURTAINS, BLACKOUT CURTAINSAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES10/26/24100-41900-50210 3623472.99 12/12/2411DC-RC3J-HK6CHIGH CAPACITY ROLL TOWEL 10"X800FT (CASE OF 6 ROLLS)AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES10/11/24100-41900-50210 3623464.97 12/12/2417Y4-6QJH-LPNHDUAL MONITOR STAND RISER W/TWO DRAWERSAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES09/28/24100-41920-50210 3623445.08 12/12/2419R7-7VX4-GXRRSANDISK 64GB EXTREME MICROSDXC UHS-I MEMORY CARD W/ADAPTERAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES08/31/24100-42100-50200 36234139.90 12/12/241KTY-39YD-WWGYBATTERY CHARGER, EARMUFFS, ENVELOPES, THERMAL PAPERAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES10/27/24100-42100-50209 362349.99 12/12/241H9R-XKMF-K3N65 PACK PHONE CORD LANDLINE, DIGITAL THERMOSTATAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES10/26/24100-42100-50321 36234116.82 12/12/241H9R-XKMF-K3N65 PACK PHONE CORD LANDLINE, DIGITAL THERMOSTATAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES10/26/24100-42100-50400 36234363.51 12/12/241KTY-39YD-WWGYBATTERY CHARGER, EARMUFFS, ENVELOPES, THERMAL PAPERAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES10/27/24100-42100-50417 3623426.88 12/12/241HJW-RC9X-3XMJTRAINING LEASHAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES08/14/24100-42100-50438 3623477.78 12/12/241KNK-VCMW-7FFFRECTRABLE GEL INK PEN, CUBICLE PANELS, DRY ERASE MARKERS, 2025 DESK CALENDARAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES11/20/24100-42400-50207 3623453.72 12/12/241G6V-VRRP-QXTWAPPLE LIGHTNING CHARGER, STICKY INDEX NOTES, MINI BAGGIESAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES11/24/24100-43100-50210 3623462.37 12/12/241JP4-YKWH-34JFPENS, CLIPBOARDSAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES11/10/24100-43100-50210 3623416.82 12/12/241TNK-LC6J-KY64SELF INKING NOTARY STAMPAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES09/06/24100-43100-50210 3623428.97 12/12/241QHF-TMVH-GYTJPET PAW PRINT IMPRESSION KIT (2 EA)AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES08/31/24100-45100-50210 3623410.76 12/12/24147L-4LYV-HPJ6TOILET PAPER, TRASH BAGS, CURTAIN ROD, CURTAINS, DOG BOWL, DISINFECTING WIPES AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES10/14/24100-45200-50210 36234294.97 12/12/241DHL-7WTJ-4QTLEYEWEAR, GARAGE DOOR OPENERSAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES11/13/24100-45200-50210 36234376.79 12/12/241JRP-MP7Y-3C4PCAR TIE DOWN STRAPS, AXLE TIE DOWN STRAPS W/PROTECTIVE SLEEVEAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES09/26/24100-45200-50210 3,387.05 Total For Check 36234 Check 36235 3623513,752.61 12/12/244221422025 LETG SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL CENTRAL SQUARE TECHNOLOGIES12/04/24100-41920-50221 13,752.61 Total For Check 36235 Check 36236 3623657,015.00 12/12/2420241212WTP CHLORTAINER PURCHASE WATER FUND 2023ACITY OF SARTELL12/04/24601-00000-16500 57,015.00 Total For Check 36236 Check 36237 362379,715.90 12/12/241375938BULK COARSE LA-HWY 98.95 TONCOMPASS MINERALS09/25/24100-43125-50210 3623721,661.70 12/12/241376887BULK COARSE LA-HWYCOMPASS MINERALS09/26/24100-43125-50210 362374,875.13 12/12/241377439BULK COARSE LA-HWY 49.65 TONCOMPASS MINERALS09/27/24100-43125-50210 362377,246.42 12/12/241377521BULK COARSE LA - HWY 73.8 TONCOMPASS MINERALS09/27/24100-43125-50210 43,499.15 Total For Check 36237 Check 36238 3623827.00 12/12/240318067-IN21" NON ADJUSTABLE OP BKTCUSTOM DOOR SALES INC11/08/24100-45200-50210 36238114.00 12/12/240318060-IN250X2X35 LW,RW CONED (1 EA)CUSTOM DOOR SALES INC11/08/24100-45200-50210 141.00 Total For Check 36238 Check 36239 362391,004.25 12/12/242082FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECTIONDEHMER FIRE PROTECTION11/04/24100-41900-50300 1,004.25 Total For Check 36239 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 2/7Page: 12/05/2024 09:07 AM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/27/2024 - 12/12/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36240 36240276.15 12/12/2498068BACKGROUND CHECKEMPLOYEE RELATIONS, INC.10/31/24100-41900-50300 276.15 Total For Check 36240 Check 36241 36241260.00 12/12/243544BMATTRESS BOX SPRING DISPOSAL QTY 11EVERGREEN RECYCLING LLC12/03/24100-43201-50210 260.00 Total For Check 36241 Check 36242 36242672,878.90 12/12/24227704864 PAY 5PAY REQUEST #5 - STIEG ROAD IMPROVEMENTSFEHN COMPANIES12/03/24100-00000-22205-087 362421,064.50 12/12/2419944CLASS 5 MODIFIED FEHN COMPANIES10/29/24100-43122-50224 3624273.89 12/12/2419399SELECT GRANULAR 12.85 TONFEHN COMPANIES09/09/24100-45200-50221 674,017.29 Total For Check 36242 Check 36243 362431,674.10 12/12/240537281SCRW TYPE / MUELLER PRATT QTY 5FERGUSON WATERWORKS #251809/23/24601-49400-50210 1,674.10 Total For Check 36243 Check 36244 36244802.37 12/12/243837DASHBOARD RENEWAL-ANNUAL STANDARD SUBSCRIPTIONFIRST ARRIVING IO, INC08/23/24100-42100-50308 802.37 Total For Check 36244 Check 36245 362451,386.00 12/12/24IN001-2016808FINAL ASSEMBLY, 6100, VALVE MODULEFORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING, LLC11/01/24100-43100-50220 1,386.00 Total For Check 36245 Check 36246 3624615.98 12/12/249260231213HOSE FITTING 5/8"X1/2" (2 EA)GRAINGER09/25/24100-43100-50210 15.98 Total For Check 36246 Check 36247 36247750.00 12/12/24320102024 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FS24-2925GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO12/02/24100-43125-50300 750.00 Total For Check 36247 Check 36248 3624820,103.27 12/12/24202412152024 4TH QUARTER FIRE PROTECTION HANOVERCITY OF HANOVER01/17/24100-42200-50300 20,103.27 Total For Check 36248 Check 36249 3624979.00 12/12/24180330PULVERIZED SCREENED TOPSOILHASSAN SAND & GRAVEL12/04/24100-43100-50225 36249691.25 12/12/24180692PULVERIZED SCREENED TOPSOILHASSAN SAND & GRAVEL12/04/24100-43100-50225 770.25 Total For Check 36249 Check 36250 362504,521.00 12/12/2414537STIEG ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AMBERLY BELLWETHERHAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES LL12/03/24100-00000-22205-087 4,521.00 Total For Check 36250 Check 36251 36251350.00 12/12/244169782025 ELECTED LEADERS INSTITUTE (TOM MCKEE)LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES11/19/24100-41110-50207 350.00 Total For Check 36251 Check 36252 36252980.00 12/12/2420241127ESCROW FEE REFUNDM KARINIEMI & K KARINIEMI12/12/24100-00000-34103 980.00 Total For Check 36252 Check 36253 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 3/7Page: 12/05/2024 09:07 AM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/27/2024 - 12/12/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36253 3625331.98 12/12/2440207SUPPLIES - M PRITCHARDMENARDS MAPLE GROVE11/07/24100-41900-50210 31.98 Total For Check 36253 Check 36254 3625478,359.11 12/12/244352FINALIZED PERMITS OCTOBER 2024METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES12/03/24100-42400-50300 3625453,857.51 12/12/244391FINALIZED PERMITS NOVEMBER 2024METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES12/03/24100-42400-50300 132,216.62 Total For Check 36254 Check 36255 3625559,043.60 12/12/2411-2024NOVEMBER 2024 SAC CHARGESMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL12/03/24602-00000-20800 59,043.60 Total For Check 36255 Check 36256 3625659.14 12/12/2420019343-75730002UB refund for account: 20019343-75730002MORONEY, RONS12/03/24601-00000-22200 59.14 Total For Check 36256 Check 36257 362571,895.68 12/12/24SWO035619-12019 MACK TRUCK REPAIRNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT12/04/24100-43100-50220 362577,168.37 12/12/24SWO034870-12010 MACK TRUCK REPAIRNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT12/04/24100-43100-50220 3625781.34 12/12/24PSO151181-12022 MACK WIPER ARMNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT12/04/24100-43100-50220 36257617.69 12/12/24PSO147517-1SHOP PARTS OIL FUEL COOLANT FILTERSNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT12/04/24100-43100-50220 362575,334.85 12/12/24SWO036621-12013 MACK TRUCK REPAIRNUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT12/04/24100-43100-50220 15,097.93 Total For Check 36257 Check 36258 3625844.97 12/12/24390481478001NAME PLATES FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERSODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC11/12/24100-41900-50200 3625861.78 12/12/24390715765001OFFICE SUPPLIES - ADDRESS LABELSODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC10/25/24100-41900-50200 3625861.99 12/12/24390716573001OFFICE SUPPLIES - BATTERIES, STAPLE REMOVERODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC10/25/24100-41900-50200 168.74 Total For Check 36258 Check 36259 3625980,101.86 12/12/24227705990 FINAL PAYCO RD 10 & BROCKTON LANE TURN LANE IMPROVEMENT PAY 2 FINALOMANN CONTRACTING COMPANIES12/03/24100-00000-22205-133 3625913,060.11 12/12/24227705990 FINAL PAYCO RD 10 & BROCKTON LANE TURN LANE IMPROVEMENT PAY 2 FINALOMANN CONTRACTING COMPANIES12/03/24408-00000-20610 93,161.97 Total For Check 36259 Check 36260 3626012,583.42 12/12/24227704747 PAY FINALMASS GRADING & STORMWATER CITY CENTER DRIVE PAY 6 FINALPARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES12/04/24408-00000-20610 36260116,166.50 12/12/24227704747 PAY FINALMASS GRADING & STORMWATER CITY CENTER DRIVE PAY 6 FINALPARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES12/04/24408-48010-50530 128,749.92 Total For Check 36260 Check 36261 362612,620.00 12/12/243172FACILITY OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTSPATNODE ELECTRIC12/03/24100-41900-50300 36261125.00 12/12/243186FACILITY OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTSPATNODE ELECTRIC12/03/24100-41900-50300 36261140.00 12/12/243172FACILITY OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTSPATNODE ELECTRIC12/03/24100-42100-50223 2,885.00 Total For Check 36261 Check 36262 36262499,650.00 12/12/24227705274 PAY 19CORCORAN WATER TOWER STORAGE TANK PAY 19PHOENIX FABRICATORS & ERECTORS, LLC12/03/24601-00000-16500 3626217,188.00 12/12/24227705274 PAY 20CORCORAN WATER TOWER STORAGE TANK PAY 20PHOENIX FABRICATORS & ERECTORS, LLC12/03/24601-00000-16500 36262(24,982.50)12/12/24227705274 PAY 19CORCORAN WATER TOWER STORAGE TANK PAY 19PHOENIX FABRICATORS & ERECTORS, LLC12/03/24601-00000-20610 36262(859.40)12/12/24227705274 PAY 20CORCORAN WATER TOWER STORAGE TANK PAY 20PHOENIX FABRICATORS & ERECTORS, LLC12/03/24601-00000-20610 490,996.10 Total For Check 36262 Check 36263 362631,863.28 12/12/24INV-205178BRITE STRIPE WHITE 5 GAL QTY 21PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY11/26/24100-45100-50210 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 4/7Page: 12/05/2024 09:07 AM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/27/2024 - 12/12/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36263 1,863.28 Total For Check 36263 Check 36264 36264142.02 12/12/24Q1597907LEASE PMT 15-DEC-24 TO 14-MAR-25QUADIENT LEASING USA INC11/13/24100-41900-50413 36264141.98 12/12/24Q1597907LEASE PMT 15-DEC-24 TO 14-MAR-25QUADIENT LEASING USA INC11/13/24601-49400-50413 36264141.97 12/12/24Q1597907LEASE PMT 15-DEC-24 TO 14-MAR-25QUADIENT LEASING USA INC11/13/24602-49450-50413 425.97 Total For Check 36264 Check 36265 36265576,324.18 12/12/24227704426 PAY 19NE WATER SUPPLY - WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT PAY 19RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP12/03/24601-00000-16500 36265(28,816.21)12/12/24227704426 PAY 19NE WATER SUPPLY - WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT PAY 19RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP12/03/24601-00000-20610 547,507.97 Total For Check 36265 Check 36266 3626683,089.27 12/12/240037382 Q33RD QTR 2024 FIRE PROTECTIONCITY OF ROGERS03/01/24100-42200-50300 83,089.27 Total For Check 36266 Check 36267 3626783,269.27 12/12/240037382 Q44TH QTR 2024 FIRE PROTECTIONCITY OF ROGERS03/01/24100-42200-50300 83,269.27 Total For Check 36267 Check 36268 36268306.39 12/12/2494097DEV FUEL FILTER ELEMENT PILOTRTL EQUIPMENT12/04/24100-43100-50220 36268158.22 12/12/2493741BOB ANTIFREEZERTL EQUIPMENT12/04/24100-43100-50220 464.61 Total For Check 36268 Check 36269 36269500.50 12/12/24147559129-0014 PRO LINE SNOW STAKE HI-VISSITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY11/05/24100-43100-50225 500.50 Total For Check 36269 Check 36270 36270446,300.38 12/12/24227705275 PAY 4PAY REQUEST #4 - NE CORCORAN TRUNK INFRASTRUCTURESR WEIDEMA12/03/24601-00000-16500 36270(22,315.02)12/12/24227705275 PAY 4PAY REQUEST #4 - NE CORCORAN TRUNK INFRASTRUCTURESR WEIDEMA12/03/24601-00000-20610 423,985.36 Total For Check 36270 Check 36271 36271371.00 12/12/242299535CORCORAN STORAGE II BP23-0027 6190 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205 362714,376.40 12/12/242299555WCA PROJECTS 6616 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205 362718,810.89 12/12/242299519BELLWETHER 6190 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205 36271179.20 12/12/242299543BASS LAKE CROSSING 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205-008 362712,512.67 12/12/242299532BECHTOLD FARM 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205-013 362713,059.22 12/12/242299520COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS 6190 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205-017 3627129,381.17 12/12/24229521TAVERA 6190 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205-056 3627127,991.48 12/12/242313779STIEG ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 4864 20241018STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205-087 3627124,706.88 12/12/242313713RUSH CREEK RESERVE 6190 20241018STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205-098 36271785.40 12/12/242299555WCA PROJECTS 6616 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205-098 36271569.06 12/12/24229530GARAGES TOO 6190 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205-111 3627134.50 12/12/242299568CR 116 AND HUNTERS RIDGE TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS 5477 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205-131 3627169.00 12/12/242299569COOK LAKE TURN LANE 5990 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-00000-22205-133 362712,022.20 12/12/242299561B002294-20-060 NEW CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 1715 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-42400-50303 362717,222.10 12/12/242299556GENERAL ENGINEERING 6870 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-43170-50300 36271718.50 12/12/242299555WCA PROJECTS 6616 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24100-43170-50309 3627114,816.30 12/12/242299565CITY CENTER DR AND 79TH PLACE STREET AND UTILITIES 5033 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24408-48010-50303 36271287.50 12/12/242299563CITY CENTER DRIVE AND 79TH PLACE 4747 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24408-48010-50303 3627128,692.70 12/12/242315749CITY DOWNTOWN PARK 7229 20241018STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24415-45200-50300 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 5/7Page: 12/05/2024 09:07 AM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/27/2024 - 12/12/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36271 3627123,573.80 12/12/242299557CITY DOWNTOWN PARK 7229 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24415-45200-50300 362711,483.75 12/12/242299517HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 6038 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24419-43100-50303 3627136,687.75 12/12/242299562WATER SUPPLY TREATMENT AND STORAGE FACILITY PRELIMINARY DESIGN 4426 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24601-00000-16500 3627123,574.50 12/12/242313777WATER SUPPLY TREATMENT AND STORAGE FACILITY PRELIMINARY DESIGN 4426 20241018STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24601-00000-16500 3627124,012.10 12/12/242299567NE CORCORAN TRUNK INFASTRUCTURE 5275 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24601-49400-50300 362711,015.14 12/12/242299561B002294-20-060 NEW CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 1715 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24601-49400-50303 36271362.50 12/12/242299558B002294-18-040 SE CORCORAN TRUNK WATERMAIN 1174 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24601-49400-50303 36271865.00 12/12/242299559B002294-19-048 WATER UTILITY 1204 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24601-49400-50303 362711,015.16 12/12/242299561B002294-20-060 NEW CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 1715 20240913STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES12/04/24602-49450-50303 269,195.87 Total For Check 36271 Check 36272 3627248.99 12/12/24I1726713SUSPENDERS - K JARLANDSTREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT10/30/24100-42100-50209 48.99 Total For Check 36272 Check 36273 36273250.00 12/12/24677803REPAIRS & MAINTENACE - 2020 FORD EXPLORER SUPERIOR FORD11/04/24100-42100-50403 250.00 Total For Check 36273 Check 36274 36274174.55 12/12/24001058990775% ARGON 90% ARGON 154 OXYGENTOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY10/25/24100-43100-50220 174.55 Total For Check 36274 Check 36275 3627556.18 12/12/2420241030NURSERY STOCK DEALER CERTIFICATE FOR 2025 TREE GIVEAWAYCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/29/24100-00000-15500 362751,498.00 12/12/2410225201096LG 70" SMART TV, LG 86" SMART TVCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/23/24100-41110-50207 3627565.38 12/12/24134610241042FACILITY OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/24/24100-41900-50210 3627522.95 12/12/24097925FINANCE STAMPSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES12/03/24100-41900-50322 36275125.00 12/12/2466875BUSINESS CARDS-DEPARTMENT CHAPLAIN (500 EA)ROGERS PRINTING09/05/24100-42100-50200 3627510.00 12/12/24080307PARKINGCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/08/24100-42100-50207 3627514.84 12/12/24760401510009LUNCH WHILE IN BOSTONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/18/24100-42100-50207 3627525.00 12/12/2420241021LUNCH WHILE IN BOSTONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/21/24100-42100-50207 3627528.69 12/12/246256BREAKFAST WHILE IN BOSTONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/19/24100-42100-50207 3627539.24 12/12/2420241023BREAKFAST WHILE IN BOSTONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/23/24100-42100-50207 3627538.17 12/12/2420241022BREAKFAST WHILE IN BOSTONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/22/24100-42100-50207 362752,020.45 12/12/241000627326WESTIN HOTEL - 5 NT STAYCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/23/24100-42100-50207 3627520.00 12/12/2418648LUNCH WHILE IN BOSTONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/22/24100-42100-50207 3627529.42 12/12/242007385648344960928LYFT FARECREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/23/24100-42100-50207 3627534.37 12/12/242006771656576047268LYFT FARE WHILE IN BOSTONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/21/24100-42100-50207 3627536.39 12/12/242005580184407213932LYFT FARE WHILE IN BOSTONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/18/24100-42100-50207 3627547.58 12/12/244812LUNCH WHILE IN BOSTONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/19/24100-42100-50207 3627511.88 12/12/2420241020LYFT STANDARD FARECREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/20/24100-42100-50207 362752,020.45 12/12/241000627321HOTEL STAY IN BOSTON (5 NIGHTS)CREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/23/24100-42100-50207 3627547.97 12/12/24429419900576MEAL WHILE IN BOSTONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/20/24100-42100-50207 3627552.31 12/12/2425205809TRAINING MEAL - PIZZACREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/09/24100-42100-50207 3627578.88 12/12/2401-000899-99-121298JERSEY MIKE'S TRAINING MEALSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/08/24100-42100-50207 3627567.83 12/12/24615083KEYPAD, WIRELESS REMOTE SNAPCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/03/24100-42100-50220 3627575.00 12/12/243609221-202410-1TRANSUNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE DATA SOLUTIONSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES11/01/24100-42100-50300 3627566.00 12/12/24734219PRO PLAN MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTIONFLEETIO10/09/24100-42100-50300 3627545.73 12/12/2420241026CELL PHONE STORAGE PLANCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/26/24100-42100-50321 36275104.11 12/12/2411539710201RC DOG ADULT, AIR DOG SQUEAKERCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/27/24100-42100-50438 3627514.00 12/12/2420241025K9 TRACKING SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION CREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/25/24100-42100-50438 3627590.06 12/12/24084465DONUTS, MILK, COFFEE, CUPS, FILTERSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/07/24100-43100-50207 36275192.33 12/12/24000043236ANTIBACTERIAL FOAMING HAND SOAP (CASE OF 4)ZEP SALES & SERVICE10/08/24100-43100-50210 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 6/7Page: 12/05/2024 09:07 AM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/27/2024 - 12/12/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 36275 3627521.61 12/12/24141POSTAGE, REGISTERED MAILPOSTMASTER10/11/24100-43170-50309 3627539.00 12/12/24INV-46543913381-1738JOTFORM (MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION)CREDIT CARD PURCHASES11/05/24100-45100-50210 362753.00 12/12/2448806671960N2U CONTEST PRIZE- DONUTS W/ COPHY-VEE 10/30/24202-42100-50210 36275470.12 12/12/24486788'X30" BANQUET-BULK (100 COUNT)CREDIT CARD PURCHASES10/23/24204-42100-50210 7,511.94 Total For Check 36275 Check 36276 36276587.50 12/12/2414929VIVAX METROTECH FERROMACNETIC LOCATORUTILITY LOGIC11/22/24601-49400-50210 362761,612.50 12/12/2414971VIVAX METROTECH CAMDRAIN REEL 100'UTILITY LOGIC11/22/24601-49400-50210 36276587.50 12/12/2414929VIVAX METROTECH FERROMACNETIC LOCATORUTILITY LOGIC11/22/24602-49450-50210 362761,612.50 12/12/2414971VIVAX METROTECH CAMDRAIN REEL 100'UTILITY LOGIC11/22/24602-49450-50210 4,400.00 Total For Check 36276 Check 36277 3627740.00 12/12/249544442020 FORD FRONT LEFT TIRE REPAIRWESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE11/01/24100-42100-50403 40.00 Total For Check 36277 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 7/7Page: 12/05/2024 09:07 AM User: RCKOTTKE DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 11/27/2024 - 12/12/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check #AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number 1,286,340.05 Fund 100 GENERAL FUND 3.00 Fund 202 CITY COMMUNITY EVENTS 470.12 Fund 204 FIREARMS SAFETY 156,913.83 Fund 408 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 52,266.50 Fund 415 PARK CAPITAL FUND 1,483.75 Fund 419 HACKAMORE UPGRADE (LENNAR) 1,610,096.64 Fund 601 WATER 62,400.73 Fund 602 SEWER Fund Totals: 3,169,974.62 Total For All Funds: STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6c. Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Director Matt Gottschalk Topic: Police Department Staffing Action Required: Authorization Summary: The police department anticipates the retirement of one full-time Police Officer in 2025. The 2025 budget also includes the addition of one part-time Community Service Officer. Due to the length of the hiring processes and training time staff is requesting authorization to begin the recruitment and hiring process for the two positions. This authorization will grant ample time to search for preferred candidates and get their training started with a reduced lapse in department staffing. Financial/Budget: The full-time Police Officer and part-time CSO positions are included in the 2025 budget. In necessary, the potential overlap between the new full-time Police Officer and the retiring full-time Police Officer could be covered with the state public safety aid funds allocated by Council on May 9, 2024. That allocation included $20,000 for police personnel costs to facilitate early hiring of police officer candidates and an additional $60,669 to a long-range public safety fund. Options: 1. Authorize staff begin the full-time Police Officer and part-time Community Service Officer recruitment and hiring processes; and to extend conditional and final lateral entry job offers as appropriate to the preferred candidates. Council Action: Authorize staff begin the full-time Police Officer and part-time Community Service Officer recruitment and hiring processes; and to extend conditional and final lateral entry job offers as appropriate to the preferred candidates. Attachments: None STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6d. Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Director Matt Gottschalk Topic: CIP Squad Car Order Action Required: Authorization Summary: Over the past several years squad car orders have been repeatedly delayed and canceled by the manufacturer. The City runs a relatively lean fleet of squad cars. The lean fleet accompanied with manufacturer delays and cancelations has run up the miles on the existing squads in advance of scheduled replacement. The 2025 Capital Improvement Plan budget includes four squad cars. Two were scheduled replacements. One squad was going to need to be replaced this year, earlier than originally planned in the CIP, due to high mileage resulting from elevated use (because of fulfillment delays) and staffing growth. The fourth squad was intended to expand the fleet in order to mitigate the escalating replacement timeline from manufacturer delays, support department growth, and maintain sufficient availability during repairs and maintenance. The squad that required early replacement due to high mileage was involved in a crash and will be replaced by insurance. Staff believes that it would be prudent to continue with the planned purchase of four squad cars. The fleet addition and recent insurance replacement will help mitigate the escalating replacement timelines and provide necessary depth to the fleet. Orders for 2025 Ford Police Interceptor squad cars are expected to close in December of 2024. The next opportunity to order the Ford Police Interceptor will not open up for the 2026 model year until late summer or early fall of 2025 likely resulting in a mid or late 2026 delivery at the earliest. Staff is requesting authorization to order four squad cars, in advance, for the 2025 CIP. Financial/Budget: The 2025 CIP budget includes four squad cars at a cost of $80,000 each for the vehicle, associated equipment, and setup costs. Total CIP budget impact of the advance order authorization is approximately $320,000. Recommendation: Authorize staff to advance order four squad cars for the 2025 CIP budget. Council Action: Authorize staff to advance order four squad cars for the 2025 CIP budget. Attachments: None STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6e. Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Sergeant Peter Ekenberg Topic: K9 Ballistic Vest Action Required: Authorize and Accept Summary: While outfitting K9 Rocky with equipment, the old ballistic vest used for the previous K-9 did not fit and was becoming outdated. The Corcoran Police Department reached out to Brady’s K-9 Fund to inquire about K-9 ballistic vests. Brady's K-9 Fund is a non-profit organization out of Strongsville, Ohio that donates practical, mission ready ballistic vests to police and military working dogs. Brady's K-9 Fund wants the K9s who protect our communities across the United States to be protected their entire shift by a ballistic vest, just like their human partners. Brady’s K-9 Fund would like to donate an LOF StreetFighter vest to K9 Rocky with Ofc. Josh Lawson. This StreetFighter vest holds a value of $1,500.00. Additionally, Rocky’s vest will come with patches with a value of $40.00. Staff believes it is an essential piece of equipment for Rocky to have. Financial/Budget: The donation is the vest and patches with a total value of $1,540. Options: 1.Authorize and accept the donation of a ballistic vest from Brady’s K-9 Fund. Council Action: Authorize and accept the donation of a ballistic vest from Brady’s K-9 Fund. Attachments: 1.Letter from Brady’s K-9 Fund Corcoran Police Department 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Dear Corcoran Police Department, Brady's K9 Fund is a non-profit organization out of Strongsville, Ohio that donates practical, mission ready ballistic vests to police and military working dogs. We want the K9s who protect our communities across the United States to be protected their entire shift by a ballistic vest, j ust like their human partners. We want them to have access to a ballistic vest they can wear their entire shift and not just when time permits to put the vest on the dog. We feel the LOF StreetFighter ballistic vest gives the K9's that best option. Brady’s K9 Fund would like to donate this style vest to K9 Rocky with Ofc. Josh Lawson. This StreetFighter vest holds a value of $1,500.00. Additionally Rock’s vest will come with patches with a value of $40.00. We feel it’s an essential piece of Equipment for Rocky to have. Thank you very much, LEAH TORNABENE President | Brady's K9 Fund Come Home Safe Together BRADY'S K-9 FUND 8988 W 130th Street Strongsville, Ohio 44136 (518) 364-4741 www.Bradysk9fund.com Info@bradysk9fund.com EIN: 83-3277164 @Bradyk9fund Agenda Attachment 6e.1. Page 1 of 8 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6f. Planning Commission Meeting: December 5, 2024 Prepared By: Dwight Klingbeil Topic: Old Farm Ridge Preliminary Plat and Variance (PID 36-119-23-23-0008) (City File No. 24-034) Action Required: Recommendation 1. Application Request The applicant, Michael Kelly, requests approval of a preliminary plat application, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance for “Old Farm Ridge”. The plat will create a lot from Outlot A of the Country Seasons Estates subdivision. The request also includes a variance to plat a lot that is less than the 20-acre minimum lot size of the Urban Reserve (UR) district. 2. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission is scheduled to review this item during the December 5, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. This report will be updated to incorporate the Commission’s feedback after the meeting is held. 3. Background This parcel was platted as an outlot of the “Country Seasons Estates” subdivision in 1978. The outlot was unique as it contained a residential structure and multiple agricultural buildings, as part of the original farmstead. Whereas most other outlots contain no buildings, aside from a few Agricultural Buildings. These structures have progressively been removed throughout the years, with the final building being removed earlier this fall. Zoning and Land Use The site is located in the Urban Reserve (UR) zoning district, and the Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Existing Residential. The property is located within the MUSA and is part of the fourth and final stage of the 2040 Staging Plan for municipal sanitary sewer and water. Figure 1 Site Location Page 2 of 8 Surrounding Properties The properties to the north, east, and south of the site are zoned Urban Reserve (UR) and are also guided for Existing Residential. The property to the west is guided Planned Unit Development (PUD) and is an outlot of the Tavera 4th Addition containing a wetland complex. Natural Characteristics of the Site The site is bifurcated by an unnamed public ditch, which flows toward the northeast corner of the parcel. A wetland delineation was conducted on this property as part of the Gleason Road Improvement Project. This delineation identified two wetland complexes over the southern, western, and northeastern portions of the site. One complex covers the entirety of the southern property line and wraps up around much of the western property line. The 2040 Natural Resource Communities Quality Ranking identifies a low- quality wetland east of the public ditch, and the 2040 Wetland Locations and Classifications map identifies a seasonally flooded basin along the southern property line. Development Rights The City’s Development Rights map does not indicate a development right assigned to this parcel. Staff reviewed the historic files for the County Seasons Estates subdivision and examined historic aerial imagery. The subdivision for Country Seasons Estates predates the establishment of the development rights. Therefore, the historical files do not explicitly detail the development rights allocated within this subdivision. The review revealed that the outlot previously contained a residential structure. Staff concludes that the fact there was a previous residential structure, the parcel has an assumed development right, even though it is not depicted on the City’s Development Rights map. The applicant requests to use this assumed right for the construction of a new single-family structure. 4. Analysis Figure 2 Zoning Map Figure 3 2040 Natural Resources Community Ranking Page 3 of 8 Staff reviewed the application for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and other City Code requirements and policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached Engineering Memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a preliminary plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinances. If the proposal meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. The Planning Commission may choose to discuss whether they agree with Staff’s analysis that the preliminary plat is consistent with ordinance standards. Should the Commission find that the preliminary plat does not comply with the City’s ordinance standards, conditions for preliminary approval can be recommended by the Commission. If the Commission recommends denial, findings of fact should be provided. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. Conditions can be applied to mitigate the impact of granting the variance. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Preliminary Plat Lot Size Figure 4 Site Layout Page 4 of 8 The table below details how the proposed plat fits within the district’s minimum dimension standards. It is noted in red where the proposal does not meet the minimum standards. UR Standards Proposal Minimum lot area 20 acres 7.65 acres Minimum lot width 300 feet 360 ft Minimum lot depth 300 feet 553 ft Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, from Major Roadways* 100 feet 422 ft Front, from all other streets 50 feet 328 ft Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 40 feet Side 25 feet 22.75 ft Rear 30 feet 400 ft The site is located within the Urban Reserve (UR) zoning district. The UR zoning district is intended to preserve areas within the MUSA, where urban services are planned, but not yet available. This district is designed to limit premature subdivision through large minimum lot area requirements. The minimum lot area for the UR district is 20 acres. The cumulative size of the outlot is 7.65 acres, which fails to meet this minimum lot area requirement. A variance from this standard will be required for this outlot to be platted which is discussed later in this report. The proposed plat appears to comply with the front and rear-yard setbacks of the UR district, as well as the 16.5 ft minimum setback from the unnamed public ditch. However, the proposed building pad is setback 22.75 ft from the north property line, which falls short of the minimum setback requirement of 25 ft. Detached accessory structures are allowed a minimum setback of 20 ft, however, attached garages are subject to the minimum side yard setback of 25 ft for principal structures. A proposed condition of approval requires the applicant to revise their building dimensions and/or building pad location, to meet all of the minimum principal structure setback requirements of the UR district. Accessory Structure The maximum allowed footprint for accessory structures is dependent on the size of the parcel. The site is 7.65 acres, which allows for an accessory structure footprint of 3,281 sq ft. However, Section 1030.020 excludes the first 1000 sq ft of attached accessory space from counting against this maximum allowance. As such, an attached garage on this parcel could have a maximum footprint of up to 4,281 sq ft. The applicant’s proposed structure is an attached garage with a footprint of 4,125 sq ft. This complies with these requirements. The proposed attached accessory structure is located in the front yard of the parcel. The proposed sidewall height of said structure is 16 ft. The maximum sidewall height of Page 5 of 8 detached accessory structures in the front yard is 10 ft, however, attached accessory structures are subject to the same height restrictions as the principal structure. Streets and Access No new streets are proposed as part of this plat. The parcel fronts three public roadways: County Road 116, Gleason Parkway, and Park Trail Road. However, natural features of the site limit practical access to two of these roads. A wetland complex separates the proposed building location from Gleason Parkway to the south, while a public ditch creates a barrier to access Park Trail Road from the proposed building location. These natural constraints make County Road 116 the only viable access point for the parcel, which is consistent with the existing access for the site. The applicant will be responsible for obtaining a permit from Hennepin County to ensure the proposed development complies with their standards. Well and Septic This parcel is located within the MUSA and is assigned to receive access to municipal services in the fourth and final stage of the 2040 staging plan. Since services are not yet available to the site, the applicant will be required to install a private septic and well system on the property. The proposed plan includes primary and secondary septic tank and mound locations. The applicant will be responsible for having this system reviewed and permitted by Hennepin County. Due to significant slopes within the site, City Staff will also review the location with the building permit. Water supply for this parcel will be provided by a private well. Private wells are permitted through the Minnesota Department of Health. The well location must be setback at least 50 from the septic system. The proposed location of the well meets this requirement. Wetlands A wetland delineation was conducted on this parcel as part of the Gleason Road Improvement Project in 2020. This delineation found a wetland over much of the south and southwest corner of the lot, as well as a wetland in the northeastern corner of the lot. These wetlands are subject to the Wetland Overlay District (Section 1050.010), which includes wetland buffers, wetland buffer monument signs, and an additional 15 ft structure setback from the edge of the buffer. Septic and soil absorptions systems must also be setback 75 ft. from a delineated wetland edge. The prosed locations for septic and soil absorption systems meet this requirement. The size of the buffer is dependent on the quality of the wetland. The City’s Natural Resources Community Quality Ranking map is based on the City’s quality assessments of known wetlands within the City. Wetlands not shown on this map are assumed to be of medium quality; however, there is a process to confirm wetland quality through Minnesota Rapids Assessment (MNRAM) methodology, should the applicant decide wetland quality on the site need to be re-evaluated. None of the wetlands within the project are shown on the City’s map, so all the wetlands will be treated as medium quality. Page 6 of 8 Medium quality wetlands have the following buffer requirements: Wetland Buffer Average Width 25' Wetland Buffer Width (Min.) 20' Wetland Buffer Width (Max.) 40' Structure Setback From Buffer 15' Total Buffer and Setback (Average) 40' A condition of approval shall require the applicant to submit a wetland buffer plan and a wetland buffer establishment plan that complies with the standards outlined in the Wetland Overlay District and the City’s wetland policies. This includes establishment of the wetland buffer strip according to the requirements of a medium quality wetland, as well as indication of permanent wetland buffer monuments. Wetland buffer monuments must be installed to indicate where property lines cross wetland buffers, and where the wetland is contoured. Spacing in between wetland monuments may not exceed 200 ft. Floodplain Part of the Gleason Road Improvement Project included a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process, which established the floodplain elevation for this property at 973.4 ft. Significant portions of the east, south, and western areas of the site lie below this floodplain elevation. Landscaping A landscape plan is not required since this plat involves less than 4 residential units. Per Section 1060.070, a minimum of on overstory tree must be provided per dwelling unit. The applicant’s narrative states that he intends to plant multiple tree plantings around the property. A condition of approval shall require the applicant to plant at least one overstory tree planting to comply with this requirement. Park Dedication Satisfaction of the Park Dedication requirements is a prerequisite of the approval of the final plat. The form of contribution shall be decided by the City Council based upon need and conformance with the comprehensive plan. The 2040 Parks & Trails Plan does not identify any parks or trails on this site; therefore, staff anticipates the Park Dedication requirements to be handled entirely as cash-in-lieu of land. The new lot will be required to pay park dedication fees per the fee schedule adopted at the time of final plat approval. The 2024 fee schedule provides the park dedication fee for a single-family unit is $5,954. Variance Section 1040.020 Subd. 9 lists the standards for area requirements in the UR district. This section requires a minimum lot area of 20 acres. The applicant requests approval Page 7 of 8 of a variance from this standard to allow the platting of a single 7.65-acre outlot to a single lot. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all variance standards from Section 1070.040, Subd. 2(B) are met with their request. These standards are as follows: A. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. D. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. E. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. There are significant challenges for this site to meet the Zoning Ordinance standards of the UR district. At 7.5 acres, the entire site is well below the UR zoning district’s minimum lot area requirement of 20 acres. The site cannot be enlarged to meet the minimum lot area requirement. Compliance with this requirement would effectively render the site unbuildable, and in turn would restrict the property owner’s ability to utilize their development right, until municipal services become available in the future. The unique circumstances of this outlot support the need for a variance. The outlot, with an assumed development right, was created prior to the establishment of the 20-acre minimum lot size requirement of the UR district and the development rights program. This creation also predates the applicant’s purchase of the property, meaning the conditions that necessitated approval of a variance were not created by the current landowner. Granting the variance aligns with the existing character of the locality. The outlot was originally created to preserve an existing farmhouse and agricultural buildings, reflecting the rural and residential identity of the area. Approving a variance will enable the parcel to return to a residential use, which would match with the uses of the surrounding neighborhood. However, the proposed structure includes a large garage intended for use as a workshop, which raises potential concerns of commercial activity on the site. To ensure the use of the property aligns with the residential character of the locality, staff proposes a condition of approval requiring a commercial activity to comply with the Home Occupation Ordinance and follow the proper approval process. Additionally, the parcel’s guiding land use designation is Existing Residential. This land use designation allows for very-low-density residential development, typically at a density of one unit per two acres. The requested variance does not alter or increase this Page 8 of 8 density and is generally consistent with the intent of the Existing Residential land use designation. Final Plat Staff reviewed the final plat application for consistency with the preliminary plat as well as City policies. Staff noted a discrepancy between the wetland boundaries between the preliminary plat and the final plat. A condition of approval shall require the final plat to be updated to have a consistent wetland boundary with the preliminary plat. The City Engineer’s memo dated November 26, 2024, includes a review of the final plat. Compliance with this memo is required as a condition of approval in the final plat resolution. Staff finds that the final plat is consistent with the preliminary plat. Summary Staff finds that the proposed preliminary plat and variance are generally consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, and Zoning Ordinance. The draft resolutions approve the preliminary plat and variance with conditions of approval. 5.Recommendation Move to recommend approval of the draft resolutions approving the preliminary plat and variance for Old Farm Ridge. Attachments: 1.Resolution 2024-130 Approving the Preliminary Plat and Variance for “Old Farm Ridge” 2.Resolution 2024-131 Approving the Final Plat for “Old Farm Ridge” 3.Engineering Memo dated November 26, 2024 4.Applicant Narrative 5.Preliminary Plat 6. Final Plat 7.Site Plans 8.Home Plans City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-130 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND VARIANCE FOR “OLD FARM RIDGE” ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6620 COUNTY ROAD 116 (PID 36-119-23-23- 0008) (CITY FILE NO. 24-034) WHEREAS, Michael Kelly (“the applicant”) requested approval “Old Farm Ridge” a preliminary plat and variance on the property described as follows; See Attachment A. WHEREAS, the applicant also requested approval of a variance from the requirement that lots in the Urban Reserve zoning district have a minimum area of 20 acres, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat and variance at a duly called public hearing, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a preliminary plat and variance subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved for “Old Farm Ridge” to allow an Outlot to be platted into a Lot, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on July 15, 2024, and additional information received on September 17, 2024, October 16, 2024, October 29, 2024, and November 6, 2024, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The requested variance from Section 1040.020 Subd. 9 to allow a lot to be platted that is less than the minimum lot area requirement of 20 acres based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The site was platted as an outlot in 1978, prior to the Urban Reserve zoning designation. The total site area is 7.5 acres and is unable to comply with the 20- acre minimum lot size of the Urban Reserve zoning district. The minimum lot size requirement would restrict the applicant’s ability to utilize the singular development right for the parcel. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and was not created by the landowner. The existing condition of the outlot necessitating the variance were created before the present owner purchased the property. The outlot has one development right and must be platted to utilize said right. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The applicant is proposing a single-family residential structure for the property, which is consistent with the existing land use of the surrounding locality. City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-130 Page 2 of 5 d. That the variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides this parcel as an Existing Residential land use. This land use allows for very-low-density residential development, typically at a density of one unit per two acres. The proposed variance would not subdivide this parcel any further and would allow a very-low- density development on this parcel. e. To ensure that the variation does not alter the essential character of the locality, no structure on the property may be used for commercial purposes aside from those approved through a Home Occupation License. 3. The applicant must comply with all conditions in the City Engineers Memo, dated November 26, 2024. 4. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. a. Wetland signs must be purchased from the City. b. Wetland signs must be installed on treated 4x4 wooden posts. c. Wetland buffer signs must be installed prior to issuance of building permits unless an alternative timeline is approved by the City. d. The installation of the wetland monument buffer signs according to the approved plans must be certified by a registered land surveyor. e. Wetland buffers must be planted and inspected by the City prior to issuance of building permits unless an alternative timeline is approved by the City. f. The final seed mix to be used in establishing the wetland buffers must be approved by the City’s wetland consultant. g. Where buffer areas are not vegetated or have been disturbed within the last 10 years, such buffer areas shall be replanted and maintained according to the standards in Section 1050.010, Subd. 8(C) of the Zoning Ordinance and the Corcoran Buffer Vegetation Establishment Plan Policy. i. The City’s wetland consultant must inspect existing wetland buffers proposed to remain to confirm the existing buffers are undisturbed and are in an acceptable condition. This must be completed prior to releasing the final plat for recording. h. The minimum and maximum dimensions as well as the average width of each of the wetland buffers must be certified by the applicant’s engineer or surveyor. i. Spacing between wetland buffer monument signs cannot exceed 200 ft. City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-130 Page 3 of 5 5. The applicant must submit a Wetland Buffer Plan and a Wetland Buffer Establishment Plan compliant with Section 1050.010 6. Park dedication shall be satisfied by cash-in-lieu of land prior to releasing the final plat for recording with Hennepin County. Park dedication will be based on the park dedication ordinance in place at the time the final plat is approved. a. Park dedication is required based on the finding that the development will add a new single-family home to the City on a property that was previously an outlot not subject to park dedication fees. b. Residents of the property will need access to nearby existing and future trails and parks that do not exist today as guided by the Comprehensive Plan. c. Cash-in-lieu of land will be used only for the acquisition and development of park recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space based on the approved park plan in the Comprehensive Plan. d. Park dedication funds will be collected at the time of final plat in accordance with the City Code requirements. The code stipulates a dedication requirement of 5% of land for land guided at a density of less than 2 units an acre or an equivalent market value in cash, resulting in estimated park dedication fees of $5,954. 7. The applicant is responsible for obtaining an access permit as required by Hennepin County. 8. The applicant must plant one overstory tree prior to release of the escrow account with the City. 9. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must complete the following: a. Revise the plan to show a principal structure with attached accessory space that complies with all minimum setback requirements of principal structures. b. Submit a preliminary wetland buffer plan to show the following: i. The minimum dimensions of all wetland buffers. ii. The maximum dimension of all wetland buffers. iii. Certification of the average width of all wetland buffers. iv. Wetland buffer monument signs at each contour and property line with a maximum spacing of 200 ft. between signs. c. Submit a Wetland Buffer Vegetation Establishment Plan compliant with the Corcoran Buffer Vegetation Establishment Plan Policy. City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-130 Page 4 of 5 d. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all wetlands and wetland buffers. 10. All utility facilities, including but not limited to telephone, CATV, natural gas, and electric power, shall be located underground. Underground service connections to the street property line of each platted lot shall be installed at the subdivider’s expense. 11. Mechanical equipment (including air conditioning units) must be located in the side or rear yard and must located a minimum of 5’ from the property line. 12. Lawn sprinklers/irrigation systems (if provided) shall all have rain sensors to limite unnecessary watering. 13. Approval of the preliminary plat shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of December 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Debra Johnson – City Clerk City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-130 Page 5 of 5 ATTACHMENT A Outlot A of Country Seasons Estates City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-131 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT FOR “OLD FARM RIDGE” ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6620 COUNTY ROAD 116 (PID 36-119-23-23-0008) (CITY FILE NO. 24-034) WHEREAS, Michael Kelly (“the applicant”) requests approval of a final plat to create a single-family lot from property described as follows: See Attachment A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the final plat for “Old Farm Ridge,” subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A final plat is approved to create 1 lot, in accordance with the plans received by the City on Jul 15, 2024, September 17, 2024, October 16, 2024, October 29, 2024, and November 6, 2024, except as amended by this resolution. 2. There are no development rights remaining for further subdivision after the land is platted. 3. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of Resolution 2024-130, approving the preliminary plat and variance for “Old Farm Ridge”. 4. Approval is subject to the preliminary plat and variance approval conditions (Resolution 2024-130), except as amended by this resolution. 5. The applicant shall comply with all requirements in the City Engineer Memo dated November 26, 2024. 6. Individual well sites are subject to permitting approval through the Minnesota Department of Health. FURTHER, prior to release of the final plat for recording: 7. Park dedication shall be satisfied by cash-in-lieu of land for the newly created lot. Park dedication will be based on the park dedication ordinance in place at the time the final plat is approved. a. Park dedication is required based on the finding that the development will add 1 new single-family home to the City. b. Residents of the development will need access to nearby existing and future trails and parks that do not exist today as guided by the Comprehensive Plan. c. Cash-in-lieu of land will be used only for the acquisition and development of parks, recreational facilities, playground, trails, wetlands, or open space based on the approved park plan in the Comprehensive Plan. City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-131 Page 2 of 4 d. Based on the adopted fee schedule at the time of final plat approval, the park dedication fee due is $5,954. 8. Revise the landscaping plan to show one overstory tree. 9. Final approval of the Wetland Buffer Establishment Plan will be provided by the City’s Wetland Specialist to confirm compliance with Section 1050.010 and City practices. FURTHER, that the following conditions must be met prior to issuance of building permits: 10. The applicant must file the final plat at Hennepin County within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. 11. The following documents must be recorded at Hennepin County and proof of recording must be provided to the City: a. Plat Mylars b. Approving Resolutions 12. Compliance with the wetland buffer establishment plan as approved by the City’s Wetland Specialist. a. A wetland buffer specialist from the City shall be present to observe the seeding of wetland buffer plantings. Seed varieties, amounts, equipment, and cover crop species shall be inspected. b. Wetland buffers shall be seeded during the grading process when conditions are appropriate. c. Wetland buffers shall be seeded and/or planted as directed by the Corcoran Buffer Vegetation Establishment Plan. 13. Wetland buffer monument signs must be installed as required by Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. 14. A septic permit must be obtained from Hennepin County. FURTHER, that the following conditions must be met prior to release of remaining escrow: 15. Prior to closing the escrow account and release of any potential refund, the applicant must complete the following: a. The approving resolution and plat mylars must be recorded at Hennepin County. b. Proof of recording must be submitted to the City. c. Lot monuments must be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The installation of the lot monuments according to the approved plan must be certified by a registered land surveyor. City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-131 Page 3 of 4 d. The wetland buffers monuments must be installed. The installation of the monuments according to the approved plan must be certified by a registered land surveyor. e. The City’s Wetland Consultant must sign off on completion of the wetland buffer establishment plan. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of December 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Debra Johnson – City Clerk City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-131 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT A Outlot A of Country Seasons Estates Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Old Farm Ridge Single Lot Redevelopment Date: November 26, 2024 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following document: 1. Preliminary Proposed Grading Plan dated 11/06/2024 by Moore Engineering. a. Final Grading Plan labeled “For Construction” is required. b. As noted below, As-Builts are also required to document constructed conditions. Comments: General 1. Disturbed areas does not include the septic systems which will be disturbed for their construction. Disturbance over an acre requires Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission process. Applicant shall submit to City correspondence of this acknowledgement from ECWMC. CSAH 116 Access 1. The lot has existing access at CSAH 116 and applicant responsible for obtaining permit from County. o County has commented on changing the access to Park Trail Boulevard with a new ditch crossing, however this would require extensive modeling, floodplain, wetland, and ECWMC permitting and from the City’s perspective is infeasible for a single-family lot. o No driveway culvert is shown on the site plan. Any culvert installation or replacement requires County approval for the access or City approval if located along the driveway. o Driveway to be 16’ in width or Corcoran Public Safety shall review the smaller driveway for safety access. o Provide elevations for driveway and ensure that it is vehicular access at or above an elevation not more than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation. Floodplain 1. The floodplain was established at 973.4 through the FEMA Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process. o Applicant shall submit the existing, surveyed elevations along the floodplain edge and then as-built conditions certified by PE showing no floodplain fill, or that equivalent compensatory storage was provided onsite. 2. The applicant shall review the newly mapped floodplain limits for this parcel and determine if any additional flood permitting is necessary (LOMR-F) for the building or applicant may need to provide information for private insurance requirements. November 2024 Old Farm Ridge Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 Private Well and Septic The property will be served by private well and septic. 1. The septic system is reviewed and permitted by Hennepin County. Due to the significant slopes within the site, the septic location grading shall also be reviewed by City staff at building permit and confirmed as appropriate. o The septic location appears to be located in or near a drainage swale. The final grading plan shall be reviewed to ensure it doesn’t impact the septic system or permit. 2. Water supply will be a private well that is permitted through the Minnesota Department of Health and needs to meet horizontal and vertical requirements (clearance from floodplain) of the State. PROJECT NARRATIVE 6620 COUNTY ROAD 116 I have recently purchased the property at 6620 County Road 116 for the purpose of converting the site from a dilapidated farm homestead to a conforming lot. The plan was to remove the existing farm buildings and replace them with a single building for my vehicles and workshop. Due to the size of the lot (7.6 acres) and central location of the proposed building the property appeared suitable for what I was looking for. In working with city staff, I was informed that I could not build on the Outlot without converting the Outlot to a platted Lot and Block and the site must include a residence. To meet these requirements the following applications were needed. VARIANCE FOR LOT SIZE The site is in the Urban Reserve Zoning District which has a minimum lot size of 20-acres. The 7.6-acre site is currently platted as Outlot A Country Seasons Estate. The original plat was approved in 1977 with 19 lots, 16 residential lots having lot sizes between 1.5 and 2.2 acres and three Outlots. It appears that Outlot A was created to keep the original farmstead. Converting the Outlot to a Lot and Block would be harmonious to the surrounding land uses and compliant to the criteria for variances, as noted below. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. As an existing lot surrounded by developed properties and roads it is not practical to convert the lot to a 20- acre parcel. It is understood that the purpose of the Urban Reserve Zoning District is to preserve land until public sewers and water is provided to support residential development. With the recent infrastructure improvements to the area, public sewer and water services are now available to support future residential use. (Per Record Plans for 66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements) The conditions for the variance are unique to the property. The lot is an existing lot that cannot be enlarged to meet the zoning code lot size standard. It would be difficult to subdivide the lot into smaller lots due to wetlands and the county ditch, which restrict building areas and road access. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The lot has been in existence since 1977 when created as part of a 19-lot subdivision. The site contained a farmhouse and farm buildings. The variance will allow for the continued use of the site as a residential use and accessory building. The proposed variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Ordinance. The Urban Reserve Zoning District allows for single-family homes. Its purpose is to preserve land until public sewer and water services is provided to support residential development. With the recent infrastructure improvements to the area, it can now support the proposed residential use. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This area is guided Existing Residential. The construction of a single-family use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT To convert an Outlot to a Lot and Block requires that we replat Outlot A to Lot 1 Block 1 OLD FARM RIDGE. By creating the new Lot and Block we are creating a single 7.6-acre lot for single-family residential use. SITE PLAN—For a single-family development in the Urban Reserve Zoning District To complement the preliminary plat, we created a site plan showing the building location, setback, easements, wetlands, driveway and grading contours to help describe the proposed development. The site is drawn on an ariel base plan to best illustrate the site conditions and surrounding area. As shown on the plan the parcel is vacant except for a few remaining buildings from the previous homestead. The buildings are centrally located on the site along the north lot line. The site has an elevation from a high point of 982, where the homestead was constructed, then drops in all direction to a low point of 970 along the south side and to 974 to the east and west. The homestead is served by a driveway access on County Road 116 that will continue to be used to access the site. The site is bisected by County Ditch 16 that runs north/south toward the eastern end of the property. Wetlands encompass most of the southern and eastern portion of the site plus along County Road 116. Although the site fronts on three roads; County Road 116, Gleason Parkway and Park Trail Road, access to the site is limited due to the wetlands and county ditch. There are no significant trees on the site with no trees over six inches in diameter. The vegetation consists mostly of wetland plants and upland grasses and forbs within the upland areas. A wetland delineation was performed by Moore Engineering on August 23rd and submitted to the LGU on August 30th. The wetland delineation report and boundaries are under review with the LGU and are anticipated to be approved by the end of September. The preliminary wetland boundaries are shown on the preliminary plat. The proposed development consists of a new residence with an attached garage/accessory structure. The home will be built at the same high point as the homestead with a first floor elevation at around the 980 contour. The home will be built as slab on grade with no basement. The living area of the residence is approximately 1,500 square feet and the garage area is approximately 4,200 square feet. The home and garage will face south with the driveway entering the south side of the garage. The home will be in compliance with the 25-foot side setback from the north lot line and the required wetland/buffer setbacks. The site plan shows a 40-foot wetland setback in compliance with a medium wetland classification. A new well will be installed replacing the existing well. The new well location has not been determined at this time. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – For an accessory structure with an eave height over 10 feet The structure I propose to build is called a Barndominium, a home that emphasizes a larger garage space. I believe this type of building provides me with the design that best serves my vehicles, and workshop needs plus is compatible to the area. However, due to the size and use of the garage the Barndominium is considered by the city of having an attached accessory structure. As an attached accessory structure, the garage area is not allotted the 35-foot height allowed for single -family homes and requires a CUP to have an eave height over 10 feet. The design and elevation of the building is based on the floor plans I have found for Advanced House Plans. Although I plan to build the home to their design the home will be built by my contractors to meet my specific needs. The home will be one-story and the garage will have a pitched roof with an eave height of 16 feet. The 16-foot eave is necessary to install a 14-foot garage door to enable a clear height tall enough for my RV and other vehicles. The roof of the garage will transition nicely to the lower roof height of the living area. (See attached architectural plans and Barndominium example) I have talked with my neighbor to the north, Craig Theis, and explained my plans. He is supportive of the request. The building location will not impact other neighboring properties or the public due to the size of the lot and central location of the building. The building will be approximately 400 feet to County Road 116, Gleason Parkway, and Park Trail Road. In addition, the land directly across County Rd 116 and Gleason Parkway are Outlots and/or ponding areas with minimal opportunity for future development. Thus, the closest existing home, besides Craig Theis, is to the northeast at around 600 feet. I understand that if the lot to the southeast of my lot is developed that house could be as close as 360 feet. Due to the design, colors and overall appearance of the Barndominium I propose to build plus the multiple tree plantings I plan to put in around the building site, the view of the building from someone over 400 feet away will be naturally mitigated and blend in nicely with the surrounding wetlands. (See attached exhibit of surrounding homes and existing conditions) The building will not generate any additional traffic other than a single-family use. Because I’m building it for me with a small living area and a single bedroom it will not generate the traffic associated with a multi- bedroom home with multiple drivers. I have lived in this general area for over 50 years. I was baptized at St. Thomas, played baseball as a child at the baseball fields in Corcoran, sent my three children to pre-school at St. Thomas and have regularly patronized many businesses in Corcoran over the years. I’m excited about cleaning up this parcel and enjoying it as my workshop. I think this development will be a nice fit on this particular site. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF OLD FARM RIDGE A REPLAT OF OUTLOT A COUNTRY SEASONS ESTATES CITY OF CORCORAN HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Scale in Feet 0 60 N W E S engineering, inc. moore PRELIMINARY AREAS NOTES LEGEND C.R. DOC. NO. ADDITIONAL NOTES Scale in Feet 0 60 N W E S engineering, inc. moore C.R. DOC. NO. LEGEND OLD FARM RIDGE 24389 EH TG ---- ---- PR E L I M I N A R Y PROJECT No. DATE: RECORD: REV DATE: REV NUM: DRAFTER: REVIEWER: MANAGER: DESIGNER: engineering, inc. moore FIG A FI L E L O C A T I O N : R: \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 4 0 0 0 \ 2 4 3 0 0 \ 2 4 3 8 9 \ C I V I L \ P R E S E N T A T I O N \ 2 4 3 8 9 _ E x i s t i n g D r a i n a g e M a p _ 2 0 2 4 0 9 1 7 . d w g 10.23.2024 ---- 66 2 0 C O U N T Y R O A D 1 1 6 CO R C O R A N , M N HE N N E P I N C O U N T Y EX I S T I N G D R A I N A G E M A P ---- ---- ---- N W E S Scale in Feet 0 100 PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T OL D F A R M R I D G E 24389 EH TG ---- ---- PR E L I M I N A R Y PROJECT No. DATE: RECORD: REV DATE: REV NUM: DRAFTER: REVIEWER: MANAGER: DESIGNER: engineering, inc. moore FIG B FI L E L O C A T I O N : R: \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 4 0 0 0 \ 2 4 3 0 0 \ 2 4 3 8 9 \ C I V I L \ P R E S E N T A T I O N \ 2 4 3 8 9 _ P r o p o s e d D r a i n a g e M a p _ 2 0 2 4 0 9 1 7 . d w g 10.23.2024 -------- ---- ---- N W E S Scale in Feet 0 100 66 2 0 C O U N T Y R O A D 1 1 6 CO R C O R A N , M N HE N N E P I N C O U N T Y PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E M A P PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T OL D F A R M R I D G E 24389 EH TG ---- ---- PR E L I M I N A R Y PROJECT No. DATE: RECORD: REV DATE: REV NUM: DRAFTER: REVIEWER: MANAGER: DESIGNER: engineering, inc. moore FIG C FI L E L O C A T I O N : R: \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 4 0 0 0 \ 2 4 3 0 0 \ 2 4 3 8 9 \ C I V I L \ P R E S E N T A T I O N \ 2 4 3 8 9 _ P r o p o s e d G r a d i n g P l a n _ 2 0 2 4 1 0 2 8 . d w g 11.06.2024 -------- ---- ---- N W E S Scale in Feet 0 100 66 2 0 C O U N T Y R O A D 1 1 6 CO R C O R A N , M N HE N N E P I N C O U N T Y PR O P O S E D G R A D I N G P L A N SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF OLD FARM RIDGE A REPLAT OF OUTLOT A COUNTRY SEASONS ESTATES CITY OF CORCORAN HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Scale in Feet 0 60 N W E S engineering, inc. moore PRELIMINARY AREAS NOTES LEGEND C.R. DOC. NO. ADDITIONAL NOTES Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6g. City Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Kendra Lindahl Topic: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for Corcoran Industrial Northeast (City file no. 24-010) Action Required: Decision Review Deadline: N/A 1. Description of Request Hempel Real Estate has submitted a request to initiate a mandatory EAW for the Corcoran Industrial Northeast industrial park to construct an 80-acre business park consisting of two buildings with a combined area of 540,000 square feet. Project components include construction of warehouse/office buildings, parking areas, access roads, trails/sidewalks, sewer/water utility improvements and stormwater ponds. The project area is currently utilized for agricultural production. The Minnesota Environmental Review Program rules require a mandatory EAW for new warehousing or light industrial facilities greater than 300,000 gross square feet in Corcoran. The Council authorized the preparation of the EAW at the October 23, 2024 City Council meeting when the concept plan was reviewed. 2. Background Under Minnesota Environmental Review Program rules, the City is the responsible governmental unit (RGU) tasked with preparing the EAW and determining whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects. The purpose of the environmental review process is to provide usable information to the project proposer, government decision-makers and the public concerning the primary environmental effects of a proposed project. The EAW should identify measures to protect the environment that can later be imposed as conditions of approval in future development applications. If the EAW identifies significant environmental effects that cannot be mitigated or minimized, the City Council would order the preparation of an EIS. An EIS does not necessarily disclose more information about potential impacts; but rather, its main purpose is to examine project alternatives and additional mitigative measures to lessen significant impacts identified in the EAW. Furthermore, an EIS is not a means to approve or deny a project but is an additional source of information to guide decisions. Very few projects move to the EIS stage because, in most cases, the EAW does an adequate job of describing the potential impacts and identifying mitigative measures. The statutory standard for requiring and EIS is whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects – it is not whether the EAW has adequately disclosed information about potential impacts. Accordingly, if Council determines that the EAW does not disclose sufficient information about potential impacts, the Council could request additional information before making a decision on the need for an EIS. Page 2 of 2 3. Analysis The item for Council to consider is approving the draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for distribution for the Corcoran Industrial Northeast park. This draft EAW document is required under the Minnesota Environmental Review rules for industrial, commercial and institutional developments. When the Council approves the EAW for distribution, the 30-day period for comments begins. Staff will finalize the draft EAW document and distribute for review and comment. All comments received by the City during that comment period will be reviewed and incorporated into the final EAW that will be brought back to the Council for Notice of Decision in February. Key dates under the tentative schedule developed by staff are: Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW Schedule Key Dates RGU approves for distribution 12/12/24 Draft document distributed for comments 12/17/24 Deadline for submission to EQB 12/17/24 EQB Publication date 12/24/24 30 day Comment Deadline 1/23/25 Notice of Decision - Council 02/13/25 No project approvals can be granted until the EAW process is completed. 4. Action Move to approve Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW for distribution and comment and publication in the EQB. Following the EAW comment period, it will be brought to the City Council for action on the EAW. Attachments 1. Draft Corcoran Industrial Northeast EAW dated November 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet Proposer: Hempel Real Estate RGU: City of Corcoran November 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet Proposer: Hempel Real Estate RGU: City of Corcoran November 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast i Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table of Contents 1. Project Title .....................................................................................................................................................1 2. Proposer .........................................................................................................................................................1 3. Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) .........................................................................................................1 4. Reason for EAW Preparation .........................................................................................................................1 5. Project Location ..............................................................................................................................................2 6. Project Description ..........................................................................................................................................2 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience .................................................................................................................4 8. Cover Types ................................................................................................................................................ 10 9. Permits and Approvals Required ................................................................................................................. 11 10. Land use ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 11. Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms .............................................................................................. 13 12. Water Resources ......................................................................................................................................... 17 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes .............................................................................................. 25 14. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) ........................... 29 15. Historic Properties ....................................................................................................................................... 36 16. Visual ........................................................................................................................................................... 39 17. Air ................................................................................................................................................................. 40 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint ................................................................................ 41 19. Noise ............................................................................................................................................................ 44 20. Transportation .............................................................................................................................................. 45 21. Cumulative Potential Effects ........................................................................................................................ 48 22. Other Potential Environmental Effects ......................................................................................................... 50 Tables Table 1. Project Magnitude .........................................................................................................................................4 Table 2. Climate Considerations and Adaptations .....................................................................................................8 Table 3. Cover Types .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Table 4. Green Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................. 11 Table 5. Tree Canopy .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Table 6. Permits and Approvals .............................................................................................................................. 11 Table 7. Soil within the Project area ........................................................................................................................ 15 Table 8. Surface Waters and Public Waters within One Mile of the Project area ................................................... 17 Table 9. Wetlands within the Project area ............................................................................................................... 19 Table 10. Impaired Waters within One Mile of the Project area .............................................................................. 20 Table 11. Verified Wells Within and Adjacent to the Project area ........................................................................... 21 Table 12. Impacts to Wetlands within the Project area ........................................................................................... 24 Table 13. MPCA Potentially Contaminated Sites within One-Quarter Mile of the Project area .............................. 27 Table 14. Migratory Birds Listed as BCC with the Potential to Occur within the Project area ................................ 31 Table 15. Previously Conducted Archaeological Surveys in the Study Area .......................................................... 36 Table 16. Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites within the Study Area .......................................................... 37 Table 17. Previously Identified Burial Sites and Cemeteries within the Study Area ............................................... 37 Table 18. Previously Identified Above Ground Historic Resources within the Study Area ..................................... 37 Table 19. Emission Categories for Carbon Footprint .............................................................................................. 41 Corcoran Industrial Northeast ii Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 20. Average Trips per Day ............................................................................................................................. 42 Table 21. GHG Emissions Summary (CO2e in short tons per year) ....................................................................... 43 Table 22. Noise Area Classifications ....................................................................................................................... 44 Table 23. Typical Roadway Construction Equipment Noise Levels at 50 Feet....................................................... 45 Table 24. Year 2028 No Build and Build Intersection Operations Analysis ............................................................ 46 Table 25. Year 2040 No Build and Build Intersection Operations Analysis ............................................................ 47 Figures Figure 1: Project Location USGS Topo Figure 2: Project Location Aerial Map Figure 3: Site Plan Figure 4: Existing Land Cover Figure 5: Existing Land Use Figure 6: Proposed Land Use Figure 7: Parks and Trails Figure 8: Surficial Geology Figure 9: Soil and Farmland Classification Figure 10: Minnesota Well Index Figure 11: Water Resources Figure 12: Wetland Impacts Figure 13: FEMA Flood Zones Figure 14: MPCA Potentially Contaminated Sites Appendices Appendix A: Figures Appendix B: MDH Well Log Reports and Stratigraphic Records Appendix C: WCA Notice of Decision Appendix D: Feasibility Study Report Appendix E: NHIS Query and IPaC Species List Appendix F: Greenhouse Gas Analysis Calculations Appendix G: Traffic Impact Study Corcoran Industrial Northeast 1 Environmental Assessment Worksheet December 2022 version Environmental Assessment Worksheet This most recent Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and guidance documents are available at the Environmental Quality Board’s website at: https://www.eqb.state.mn.us/ The EAW form provides information about a Project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. Guidance documents provide additional detail and links to resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item or can be addressed collectively under EAW Item 21. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project Title Corcoran Industrial Northeast 2. Proposer Proposer: Hempel Real Estate Contact person: Brandon Champeau Title: Executive Vice President - Development Address: 10050 Crosstown Circle Suite 600 City, State, ZIP: Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 612-432-5774 Fax: N/A Email: bchampeau@hempelcompanies.com 3. Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) RGU Agency: City of Corcoran Contact person: Kendra Lindahl Title: City Planner Address: 8200 County Road 116 City, State, ZIP: Corcoran, MN, 55340 Phone: 612-638-0225 Fax: N/A Email: klindahl@landform.net 4. Reason for EAW Preparation Required: Discretionary: EIS Scoping Citizen petition X Mandatory EAW RGU discretion Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): 4410.4300, Subpart 14(A)(2): Industrial facilities (300,000 square foot threshold) Corcoran Industrial Northeast 2 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 5. Project Location County: Hennepin City/Township: Corcoran PLS Location (¼, ¼, Section, Township, Range): east ½ of northeast ¼ of Section 1, Township 119N, Range 23W Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Mississippi River (Rush Creek sub watershed of the Elm Creek watershed) GPS Coordinates: 45.149196, -93.524542 Tax Parcel Number: 0111923110001 At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the Project; See Figure 1 and Figure 2, Appendix A • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating Project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); and See Figure 1, Appendix A • Site plans showing all significant Project and natural features. Pre-construction site plan and post- construction site plan. See Figure 3, Appendix A • List of data sources, models, and other resources (from the Item-by-Item Guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience or other) used for information about current Minnesota climate trends and how climate change is anticipated to affect the general location of the Project during the life of the Project (as detailed below in item 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience). 6. Project Description a. Provide the brief Project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). Hempel Real Estate (Proposer) proposes to develop a light industrial park in the northeastern portion of the City of Corcoran (RGU). The Project would create two industrial buildings, totaling approximately 540,000 square feet. The developer plans to construct the project in two phases and building are intended for a mix of industrial uses, including distribution and manufacturing. The Project would include construction of public improvements, including access roads connecting to County State Aid Highway 101 (CSAH 101), pedestrian improvements, and stormwater management. Construction of the Project is anticipated to begin in summer 2025, with completion of phase 1 in summer 2026. b. Give a complete description of the proposed Project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the Project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities Hempel Real Estate proposes to develop “Brockton Business Park”, a light industrial park including two light industrial use buildings (totaling approximately 540,000 square feet). The buildings would have a mixture of warehouse, manufacturing and other industrial uses and office space (approximately 80 percent and 20 percent, respectively). The Project area is located in the Northeast District of the City of Corcoran in Hennepin County, Minnesota on the west side of CSAH 101. CSAH 101 is the boundary between Maple Grove, immediately to the east. The Project Area is bordered by Rogers to the north and Dayton to the northeast. The Project area is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is planned to develop with municipal sanitary sewer and water. The 78.85-acre Project area currently Corcoran Industrial Northeast 3 Environmental Assessment Worksheet consists of agricultural land, wetlands and undeveloped forest. Note: The Project’s construction disturbance and light industrial use would be limited to approximately 50 acres. Within the wooded area in the southwest portion of the Project area, there are remnants of a former farmstead consisting of dilapidated buildings and debris. The farmstead has been evaluated for its potential historic value and deemed as not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Remnants would be removed from the site and properly disposed. Additional information about the farmstead is provided in EAW Item 15. Construction Activities 1) Construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes Standard construction methods are expected to be used. The site layout and landscaping would work with the existing topography of the area. A majority of the existing wetlands and tree cover (approximately 30 percent of the site) would be protected, and an estimated 500 new trees and 1,500 new shrubs would be planted. The Project would include construction of new privately constructed and publicly owned access roads connecting to CSAH 101, including extension of the local road at the Nelson International access south of the Project and a new collector street on the northside of the Project. Turn lanes along CSAH 101, to accommodate the new access roads as well as pedestrian improvements, are anticipated to be constructed. A stormwater management system would be constructed for the Project and would avoid the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplain located in the northern portion of the Project area. The Project is in the MUSA and is planned to develop with municipal sanitary sewer and water. Utilities would need to be extended to serve the site. 2) Modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes No modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes are anticipated. 3) Significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures The dilapidated buildings and remaining foundation associated with the farmstead would be demolished and debris would be properly disposed of. With the exception of the farmstead, the Project area is vacant. 4) Timing and duration of construction activities Construction activities would be expected to begin in the summer of 2025 and would take place in two phases. Phase 1 would be expected to be complete by the summer of 2026, and Phase 2 by the summer of 2027. The expected construction timeline is subject to change and would ultimately be driven by market demand. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 4 Environmental Assessment Worksheet c. Project magnitude Table 1 summarizes the Project magnitude. Table 1. Project Magnitude Description Number Total Project Acreage 78.85 acres1 Linear Project length N/A Number and type of residential units 0 Residential building area (in square feet) 0 sq. ft. Commercial building area (in square feet) 0 sq. ft. Industrial building area (in square feet) 540,000 sq. ft. Institutional building area (in square feet) 0 sq. ft. Other uses – specify (in square feet) Stormwater Basins - 234,353 sq. ft. (estimated) Preserved Wetlands - 905,612 sq. ft. (estimated) Berming - 85,378 sq. ft. (estimated) Greenspace - 1,150,420 sq. ft. (estimated) Structure height(s) Maximum 45 ft 1While the Project area is 78.85 acres, only approximately 50 acres would be directly disturbed by the Project through construction and use. d. Explain the Project purpose; if the Project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the Project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of the Project is to provide additional warehousing and office space for business in the City of Corcoran. The City of Corcoran 2040 Comprehensive Plan 0F1guides the Project area as Light Industrial and according to the city document, it is the only remaining parcel of undeveloped industrial land in the Northeast District. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present Project, timeline and plans for environmental review. f. Is this Project a subsequent stage of an earlier Project? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience a. Describe the climate trends in the general location of the Project (see guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience) and how climate change is anticipated to affect that location during the life of the Project. In general, Minnesota is anticipated to experience an increase in temperature, precipitation, and more frequent extreme precipitation events resulting from climate change. In Minnesota, annual average temperatures have risen two degrees over the past century and up to three degrees in the northern part of the state. The highest average temperature increases have occurred during the winter. Since 1895, temperatures during the winter have increased at a rate two to three times higher than during the 1 City of Corcoran, 2019. 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Available at: https://www.corcoranmn.gov/public_services/planning_and_zoning/corcoran_2040_comprehensive_plan_update. Accessed November 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 5 Environmental Assessment Worksheet summer. In particular, winter warming rates have risen more sharply in recent decades. 1F2 Current climate warming trends, most notably during the winter, are anticipated to continue.2F3 Heavy rain events have become more frequent in Minnesota and more intense. From 1973 to 2020, Minnesota experienced 17 mega-rain events3F4 with a notable increase since 2000. Of these 17 events, three occurred in the 1970s, two in the 1980s, one in the 1990s, six mega-rain events occurred in the 2000s, four in the 2010s, and one in 2020. Thus, in the past 21 years (2000 to 2020), almost two times as many mega rain events occurred compared to the prior 27 years (1973 to 1999).4F5 Climate trends in Hennepin County parallel the overall statewide trends, indicating Minnesota’s climate is becoming warmer and wetter. Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 illustrate historical average annual temperature and precipitation trends from 1895 to 2023, respectively. During this time period, the County experienced an average annual temperature increase of 0.24 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) per decade and an annual precipitation increase of 0.23 inches per decade. Exhibit 1. Historical Annual Average Temperature in Hennepin County (1895 – 2024) Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR). https://arcgis.MnDNR.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical Exhibit 2. Historical Annual Average Precipitation in Hennepin County (1895 – 2024) 2 MnDNR, undated(a). Climate Trends. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/climate_change_info/climate-trends.html. Accessed October 2024. 3 MnDOT, 2021. Minnesota Go Climate Change Report. Available at: https://www.minnesotago.org/trends/climate-change. Accessed October 2024. 4 Mega-rain events are defined as events in which six inches of rain covers more than 1,000 square miles and the core of the event tops eight inches. 5 MnDNR, 2024(a). Historic Mega-Rain Events in Minnesota. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/summaries_and_publications/mega_rain_events.html. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 6 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Source: MnDNR. https://arcgis.MnDNR.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) utilizes temperature and precipitation data to estimate relative soil moisture conditions and serve as an indicator of long-term drought conditions. The index ranges from -5 to +5 indicating dry and wet conditions, respectively. PDSI values are reported on a monthly basis. Exhibit 3 shows historic PDSI values for the month of August from 1895 to 2023 for Hennepin County, which indicates an increase of 0.18 per decade. Generally, the PDSI historical data indicates that the region is experiencing a wetter climate. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 7 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Exhibit 3. Historical PDSI Values for Hennepin County (1895 – 2024) Source: MnDNR. https://arcgis.MnDNR.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical Projected climate trends indicate that temperatures within the County would continue to increase. Exhibit 4 illustrates Projected temperatures for the County. Several climate models are shown in the projected temperature analysis. The model mean, shown in blue, illustrates the average of all models included in the analysis. Exhibit 4 shows the modeled present condition, mid-century (2040-2059) at Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5, late-century (2080-2099) at RCP 4.5, and late-century (2080-2099) at RCP 8.5. RCP is a greenhouse gas concentration scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in the fifth assessment report. RCP 4.5 is an intermediate scenario in which emissions decline after peaking around 2040 and RCP 8.5 represents a worst-case scenario in which emissions continue rising through the 21st century. Under the RCP 4.5 scenario, the annual temperature is anticipated to increase within the County from a modeled present mean of 45.3°F (1980-1999) to a mid-century (2040-2059) model mean of 48.9°F and a late-century (2080-2099) model mean of 51.3°F. Under the RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario, the County would experience a late-century (2080-2099) model mean temperature of 55.0°F. In comparison to the modeled present mean (1980-1999), the late-century (2080-2099) modeled mean annual temperature would increase by approximately 12.4 percent under the RCP 4.5 scenario and increase by approximately 19.3 percent under the RCP 8.5 scenario. Exhibit 4. Projected Temperatures in Hennepin County Source: MnDNR. https://arcgis.MnDNR.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical Exhibit 5 presents Projected average annual precipitation for Hennepin County. Under the RCP 4.5 scenario, the annual precipitation is anticipated to increase within the County from a modeled present mean of 31.6 inches (1980-1999) to a mid-century (2040-2059) model mean of 32.1 inches and a late- century (2080-2099) model mean of 32.9 inches. Under the RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario, the County would experience a late-century (2080-2099) model mean precipitation of 35.7 inches. In comparison to Corcoran Industrial Northeast 8 Environmental Assessment Worksheet the modeled present mean (1980-1999), the late-century (2080-2099) modeled mean annual precipitation would increase by approximately 4.0 percent under the RCP 4.5 scenario and increase by approximately 12.2 percent under the RCP 8.5 scenario. Exhibit 5. Projected Precipitation in Hennepin County Source: MnDNR. https://arcgis.MnDNR.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical b. For each Resource Category in the table below: Describe how the Project’s proposed activities and how the Project’s design will interact with those climate trends. Describe proposed adaptations to address the Project effects identified. Table 2 summarizes climate considerations related to the Project and adaptation considerations. Table 2. Climate Considerations and Adaptations Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Adaptations Project Design Projected climate trends include increasing temperatures, precipitation, and frequency of heavy rainfall events. Minnesota is trending towards warmer temperatures. Urban heat islands occur when impervious surfaces, such as roofs and paved surfaces, absorb heat during the day and release it at night, amplifying the warming trend. Construction of buildings, roadways, pedestrian improvements, and parking areas associated with the Project would increase impervious surface area. Increased impervious surfaces would increase volume of stormwater runoff and potential flooding risk during heavy rain events. Impervious surfaces may create local heat island effects by absorbing heat during daytimes hours and radiating it at night leading to an increase in surface temperatures. The Project would follow proposed and recommended actions outlined by the City of Corcoran which may include planning documents such as the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. Additional measures to minimize heat island effects may include strategically planting trees to increase shading near buildings to reduce energy use associated with air conditioning and incorporating green building design features such as green roofs or cool roofs to reduce energy costs, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, and improvements to manage stormwater runoff rates. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 9 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Adaptations Land Use Heavier rainfall expected to bring a higher risk of localized flooding. Increased temperatures may create public health crises primarily for the vulnerable communities such as children and the elderly. The majority of the Project area currently consists of wetlands, agricultural land, and undeveloped forest. Conversion from agricultural and undeveloped land to industrial development would increase impervious surfaces and may contribute to local heat island effects. he Project does not propose critical facilities such as hospitals, daycare centers, public utilities, or schools within the Project area that would have heightened sensitivity to the climate considerations identified. Measures to avoid and minimize impacts to existing wetlands within the Project area would be evaluated. Opportunities to mitigate potential increased risk of flooding associated with a projected increase in heavy rainfall events may include constructing green infrastructure features such as rain gardens, catch basins, and infiltration systems. Local heat island effects from adding impervious surface to the Project area may be mitigated by avoiding removal of existing tree canopy and the planting of new trees to increase shade in developed areas. Water Resources Addressed in Item 12. Contamination/ Hazardous Materials/Wastes The Project area is projected to experience an increase in precipitation and heavy rainfall events. The Project is not anticipated to involve the installation of chemical/ hazardous materials storage during operation. The Project would include building demolition and removals (farmstead only). A Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) plan would be utilized during construction to minimize the potential for spill events. Waste generated during construction and demolition would be properly managed and disposed of in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 10 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Adaptations Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features) Addressed in Item 14. 8. Cover Types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development. Table 3 and Figure 4, Appendix A summarize cover types within the Project area. Table 3. Cover Types Cover Types Before (acres) After (acres) Wetlands and shallow lakes (<2 meters deep) 20.71 20.4 Deep lakes (>2 meters deep) 0.41 0.4 Wooded/forest 10.6 5.5 Brush/grassland 9.8 9 Cropland 35.9 0 Lawn/landscaping 0 11.63 Green infrastructure TOTAL (from table below*) 0 0 Impervious surface 1.52 26.6 Stormwater Basins 0 5.4 TOTAL 78.94 78.94 Before” Acreages are approximate and based on TCMA 1-Meter Land Cover geospatial data (see Figure 4, Appendix A), tree survey data, and wetland delineation data. 1 The combined “Before” acreages for “Deep lakes” and “Wetlands and shallow lakes” reflects the wetland delineation totaling 21.1 acres. 2 Based on visual geospatial and field observations, some of the “Impervious surface” quantified for the “Before” condition (including Roads/Paved Surfaces reflected in Figure 4, Appendix A) would likely be better categorized as “Cropland” or “Brush/grassland”. 3 “After” acreage for “Lawn/landscaping” would include approximately 500 new trees and 1,500 new shrubs. 4 78.85-acre site rounded for purposes of this exercise to 78.9 acres. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 11 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 4. Green Infrastructure Green Infrastructure* Before (acreage) After (acreage) Constructed infiltration systems (infiltration basins/infiltration trenches/ rainwater gardens/bioretention areas without underdrains/swales with impermeable check dams) 0 0 Constructed tree trenches and tree boxes 0 0 Constructed wetlands 0 0 Constructed green roofs1 0 0 Constructed permeable pavements 0 0 Other (describe) Landfill-based geothermal system 0 0 TOTAL* 0 0 1 Proposer has designed building rooftops with square footage to accommodate future, potential green roof opportunities. Table 5. Tree Canopy Trees Percent Number Percent tree canopy removed, or number of mature trees removed during development 48 percent Number of new trees planted 500 9. Permits and Approvals Required List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the Project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Table 6. Permits and Approvals Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit- To be completed, if required State Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit To be completed MPCA Sewer Extension Permit To be completed MPCA Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup and/or Brownfield Programs Response Action Plan (RAP) and Construction Contingency Plan (CCP) Approval Minnesota Department of Health Watermain Extension Permit To be completed Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI) 1 Plumbing Review Permit To be completed Corcoran Industrial Northeast 12 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Unit of Government Type of Application Status County Hennepin County County Road Access Permit To be completed Hennepin County Right of Way Permit To be completed Local City of Corcoran EAW / EIS Need Decision Draft prepared City of Corcoran Wetland Conservation Act (Boundary Approval/Replacement Plan) To be completed City of Corcoran Preliminary and Final Plat To be completed City of Corcoran Site Plan To be completed City of Corcoran Variance To be completed City of Corcoran Erosion Control, Grading, and Stormwater Permit To be completed City of Corcoran Building Permits To be completed Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Stormwater, Erosion Control, and Site Plan Approval To be completed 1 Permit would be coordinated by Proposer with DOLI during City Building Permit review. Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 10-20, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No.22. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 21. 10. Land use a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks and open space, cemeteries, trails, prime or unique farmlands. There is a vacant home and several associated farmstead agricultural buildings. Most of the existing land use of the site is agricultural. On the uncultivated areas, there are scattered clumps of trees and vegetation, natural grasslands and mowed turf areas. Five wetlands are shown on the site. The surrounding property to the north, east and west is a mix of cropland, woods, wetlands, and undeveloped natural open space. Two of the properties to the east, across CSAH 101, have single family homes and accessory buildings. The property to the south is developed as Nelson International and the western portion of that property has a large wetland complex. See Appendix A Figure 5 for details. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The site is guided Light Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan. The site is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) in phase I of the sewer staging plan. The Parks and Trails map (Figure 7, Appendix A) shows a potential Greenway Corridor though the south portion of the property as well as an off-road trail along the western property line. On road trails are planned on CSAH 101 and the future extension of CSAH 117 in Rogers north of this site. Additionally, as described in the Feasibility Study Report in Appendix D, Section 3.1, the development would include dedication of property and coordination with the City for a future well site along the western portion of the development. The future well would ultimately provide raw water to the City’s recently constructed water treatment facility. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 13 Environmental Assessment Worksheet iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The site is zoned Light Industrial (I-1) and is subject to the Northeast District Design Guidelines. This is the only remaining parcel of industrial land in the Northeast District. The proposed office/industrial uses are allowed in the I-1 Zoning District and Northeast District. iv. If any critical facilities (i.e. facilities necessary for public health and safety, those storing hazardous materials, or those with housing occupants who may be insufficiently mobile) are proposed in floodplain areas and other areas identified as at risk for localized flooding, describe the risk potential considering changing precipitation and event intensity. Not applicable. b. Discuss the Project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. The proposed Project includes planned infrastructure improvements related to new public streets, utilities and surface water management and treatment. Erosion control measures would be required and utilized per state requirements during construction, and the Zoning Ordinance addresses noise, smoke odor and other potential negative impacts on surrounding areas that could be encountered with an industrial use of the site. Landscaping installations required with the Project development would have known and proven benefits for birds, wildlife, shade cooling, air quality and carbon reduction. c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed Project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 10b above and any risk potential. The required setbacks and landscaping would buffer the new use from existing surrounding land uses. The Project is preserving significant natural open space with trees and wetlands on the north and south portions of the property to buffer from adjacent properties. The City would proactively monitor the construction to ensure compliance with all City, watershed and state regulations. 11. Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the Project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the Project and any effects the Project could have on these features. Identify any Project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. The surficial geology in the Project area has been mapped by the Minnesota Geological Survey’s (MGS) Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County as being sediments consisting of glacial till. Specifically, the Project area contains loam till and clay loam till, with the presence of organic clayey silt to sand in the northeast and southwest corners (Figure 8, Appendix A). The surface expression of the till is generally rolling and hummocky with numerous ice-walled stagnation plains and ice-block melt-out depression indicative of ice stagnation. Silt loam deposited in ponded water is thin, patchy, and locally present on the tops of ice-walled stagnation plains. The organic clayey silt and sands are lacustrine deposits in former lake basins that were likely originated as water ponded in former ice block locations. Organic detritus comprised of plant material in post-glacial land surface depressions exist in areas currently or formerly beneath the water table.5F6 The bedrock geology across the Project area has been mapped in the MGS Geologic Atlas of 6 Steenberg, Julia R.; Bauer, Emily J.; Chandler, V.W.; Retzler, Andrew J.; Berthold, Angela J.; Lively, Richard S. 2018(a). Minnesota Geological Survey. County Atlas Series. Atlas C-45, Hennepin County. Plate 3 – Surficial Geology. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11299/200919. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 14 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Hennepin County as being the Jordan Sandstone from the late Cambrian Period. The Jordan Sandstone is characterized by medium- to coarse-grained, friable quartzose sandstone.6F7 The bedrock topography within the Project area is mapped to be approximately 801 to 825 feet above mean sea level (amsl) and the depth to bedrock is estimated between 76 and 150 feet.7F8 According to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Minnesota Well Index (MWI), one well was identified within the Project area and five wells were identified within one-quarter mile of the Project area. One of these wells (Unique Well 208988) has a well log and stratigraphic report recording the presence of bedrock, the Jordan Sandstone, at 139 ft.8F9 The well log report and stratigraphic record are available in Appendix B. According to the MnDNR, Karst Feature Inventory, there are no known karst or sinkhole features within the Project area or within the vicinity of the Project area. Further, the US Geological Survey (USGS) does not identify the Project area as being within a known or potential karst area (Weary and Doctor 2014).9F10 The nearest known feature is a sinkhole approximately 10 miles to the northeast of the Project area in Andover, MN (field verified in 2017).10F11 The first encountered bedrock at the Project area is the Jordan Sandstone, which is an insoluble quartz-rich sandstone not known for karst development. Due to the lack of soluble carbonate bedrock, the formation of karst within the Project area is unlikely. b. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from Project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after Project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 12.b.ii. The approximately 78.9-acre Project area features mixed topography. The southern approximately two- thirds of the site is relatively flat with gently, undulating contours. The northern one-third features an approximately 15 percent hillside across the whole width of the property that slopes down to another relatively flat area. The highest elevations are in the south end of the Project area. Total elevation change within the site is approximately 36 feet. The site is currently undeveloped with no impervious surfaces. Wetlands are present on the south and north ends. According to the U.S. Department of Agricultural (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soil survey data11F12, there are 10 soil map units within the Project area. A soil map unit is typically comprised of more than one soil series. The various series in a map unit represent associated soils that formed on different landscape positions within the map unit. The map unit is named after the most dominant soil series by areal extent. Table 7 below lists the soil map units within the Project area and select map unit attributes relevant to Item 11b, such as Hydrologic Soil Group, Wind Erodibility Group, and Water Erodibility Factor. Attributes in Table 7 are for the dominant soil condition within the map unit. See Figure 9, Appendix A for soil survey mapping. 7 Steenberg, Julia R.; Bauer, Emily J.; Chandler, V.W.;Retzler, Andrew J.; Berthold, Angela J.; Lively, Richard S. 2018(b). Minnesota Geological Survey. County Atlas Series. Atlas C-45, Hennepin County. Plate 2 – Bedrock Geology. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11299/200919. Accessed October 2024 8 Steenberg, Julia R.; Bauer, Emily J.; Chandler, V.W.;Retzler, Andrew J.; Berthold, Angela J.; Lively, Richard S. 2018(c). Minnesota Geological Survey. County Atlas Series. Atlas C-45, Hennepin County. Plate 6 – Depth to Bedrock and Bedrock Topography. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11299/200919. Accessed October 2024. 9 MDH, 2024. MWI. Available at: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/mwi/index.html. Accessed October 2024 10 Weary, D.J. and Doctor, D.H.. 2014. Karst in the United States: A digital map compilation and database: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014-1156, 23 p. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141156. Accessed October 2024. 11 MnDNR, undated(b). Karst Feature Inventory. Available at: https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=9df792d8f86546f2aafc98b3e31adb62. Accessed October 2024 12 Soil Survey Staff, NRCS, USDA, 2024. Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO). Accessed via ESRI ArcGIS Online tool October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 15 Environmental Assessment Worksheet The soil map units within the Project area generally feature low wind or water erosion potential. Only one the map unit features rapidly permeability, but only if subject to artificial drainage (map unit L14A). Map units L14A, L15A, L23A, L24A, and L45A feature hydric soils with water tables at or near the surface during parts of the growing season, which would create limitations for infiltrative stormwater practices. The Project would significantly alter the existing soil and topographic conditions through grading and construction activities. It is anticipated that approximately 50 acres of the Project area soils would be disturbed by grading or filling activities related to site leveling for structure and road construction. Soil balance and grading volumes are not yet known and would be determined when the design and grading plan are further developed. The Project would adhere to erosion and sediment control practices during demolition, construction, and operations per the conditions of the Project’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Stormwater Permit, and any local permitting conditions. See EAW Item 12.b.ii for details on stormwater management and erosion and sediment control. Table 7. Soil within the Project area Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Hydrologic Group Wind Erodibility Group Water Erodibility Factor (Kf) Acres % of Project area L44A Nessel loam, 1 to 3% slopes C 5 0.32 16.76 21.25% L60B Angus-Moon complex, 2 to 5% slopes B 6 0.33 16.09 20.41% L24A Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1% slopes C/D 6 0.32 14.47 18.35% L45A Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3% slopes C/D 5 0.36 8.97 11.38% L14A Houghton muck, 0 to 1% slopes A/D 2 No Rating 8.34 10.58% L23A Cordova loam, 0 to 2% slopes C/D 6 0.3 4.08 5.17% L37B Angus loam, 2 to 6% slopes C 6 0.32 3.80 4.82% L22C2 Lester loam, 6 to 10% slopes, moderately eroded C 6 0.32 2.38 3.01% L15A Klossner, Okoboji and Glencoe soils, ponded C/D 8 0.36 2.10 2.66% L61C2 Lester-Metea complex, 6 to 12% slopes, eroded B 6 0.32 1.85 2.35% L44A Nessel loam, 1 to 3% slopes C 5 0.32 16.76 21.25% TOTAL: 78.85 100.00% Note: The hydrologic soil groups are: • Group A: Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 16 Environmental Assessment Worksheet • Group B: Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained, or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. • Group C: Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. • Group D: Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential). These consist chiefly of soils with high clay content, soils that have a high-water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. • Dual Groups: Dual Group designations (A/D, B/D, or C/D) are used to indicate wet soils that belong to Group D due to a high water table but would meet the drainage or textural criteria for Group A, B, or C if drained. Dual Group soils should be treated as Group D soils in the absence of effective artificial drainage. The soil erodibility factors are: • Wind Erodibility Group: Soils are assigned a Wind Erodibility Group (WEG) rating based on their inherent vulnerability to soil particle detachment from wind forces. Values range from 1 (most erodible) to 8 (least erodible). • Water Erodibility Factor (Kf): The Soil Erodibility Factor (Kf) is a unitless quantitative description of the inherent vulnerability of a soil to water erosion. It provides a measurement of soil particles’ susceptibility to detachment from rain drops or surface runoff. Values range from 0.02 (least erodible) to 0.69 (most erodible). Corcoran Industrial Northeast 17 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 12. Water Resources a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, shoreland classification and floodway/floodplain, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include the presence of aquatic invasive species and the water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the Project. Include MnDNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. Surface Waters The Project area is located within the Rush Creek subwatershed of the Elm Creek Watershed and is part of the larger upper Mississippi River watershed. A review of geospatial data determined that one lake12F13 was located within the Project area. No wildlife lakes13F14, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lakes14F15, outstanding resource value waters15F16 or infested waters16F17 are located within the Project area. Table 8 below lists the surface waters identified in the Minnesota Public Water Inventory17F18, MnDNR Hydrography Dataset and MnDNR State Designated Trout Streams18F19 databases located within one mile of the Project area. See Figure 11, Appendix A for select surface water features. Table 8. Surface Waters and Public Waters within One Mile of the Project area Water Resource Type Kittle No./Public Water ID Special Designation Within Project area Unnamed Public Water Wetland 27031900 Public Water Within One Mile of the Project area Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Intermittent Water, Public Water Wetland 27031700 Public Water Unnamed Lake/Pond, Public 27011300 Public Water 13 MnDNR, 2022(a). DNR Hydrography Dataset. Available at: DNR Hydrography Dataset . Accessed October 2024. 14 MnDNR, 2016(a). Designated Wildlife Lakes. Available at: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-designated-wildlife-lakes. Accessed October 2024. 15 MnDNR, 2016(b). Migratory Waterfowl Feeding and Resting Areas. Available at: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-migratory-waterfowl- areas. Accessed October 2024. 16 MnDNR, 2020. Lakes of Biological Significance. Available at: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-lakes-of-biological-signific. Accessed October 2024. 17 MnDNR, 2023. Listed Infested Waters. Available at: Listed Infested Waters. Accessed October 2024. 18 MnDNR, undated(c). Minnesota Public Waters Inventory. Accessed via MNGEO hosted map server October 2024. 19 MnDNR, 2020(b). State Designated Trout Streams, Minnesota. Available at: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-trout-stream-designations. Accessed October 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast 18 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Water Resource Type Kittle No./Public Water ID Special Designation (Westwood Ponding Area) Water Wetland Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Intermittent Water, Public Water Wetland 27031800 Public Water Unnamed Artificial Basin Unnamed Intermittent Water, Public Water Wetland 27030700 Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Artificial Basin Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Unnamed Lake/Pond Rush Creek Perennial Stream, Public Ditch/Altered Natural Watercourse M-062-004 Public Watercourse, Impaired Stream Rush Creek, South Fork Lake Connector, Public Water Watercourse M-062-004-002 Public Watercourse, Impaired Stream Unnamed Creek Intermittent Stream M-062-004-002- 001 Unnamed Intermittent Stream MAJ-070131312_B Unnamed Intermittent Stream MAJ-070127883_B Corcoran Industrial Northeast 19 Environmental Assessment Worksheet MnDNR Public Waters One MnDNR Public Water is located within the Project area, six MnDNR Public Waters and Watercourses are located within one mile of the Project area. Table 8 above identifies MnDNR Public Waters and Watercourses within one mile of the Project area. Wetland Resources Based on a review of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) data, historic aerial imagery, and wetland delineations conducted by Sambatek in the early Fall of 2021 October 11 and October 22, 2021, five wetlands are present within the Project area (Figure 12, Appendix A). Table 9 summarizes wetlands within the Project area. Appendix C includes the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Notice of Decision. Table 9. Wetlands within the Project area Wetland ID1 Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers and Reed Acres within Project area Wetland 1 Type 1/3 PEM1Ad/PEM1C Seasonally Flooded/Saturated Emergent Wetland/Shallow Marsh 13.73 Wetland 2 Type 1/5 PEM 1A/PUBH Seasonally Flooded/Saturated Emergent Wetland/Non- vegetated Aquatic Community 1.36 Wetland 3 Type 1/3/5 PEM1A/PEM1Cd/PABHx Seasonally Flooded/Saturated Emergent Wetland/Shallow Marsh/Shallow Open Water Community 5.73 Wetland 4 - - - 0.21 Wetland 5 Type 1 PEM1A Seasonally Flooded 0.03 1 Wetland ID’s have been revised by Stantec. The original wetland delineation conducted on October 11, 2021 only identified four wetlands, and the revised wetland map based on the October 22, 2021 delineation did not properly convey Wetland ID’s. MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List Based on a review of the MPCA’s 2024 Impaired Waters List19F20, no MPCA 303d Impaired Waters are located within the Project area. Rush Creek and Rush Creek, South Fork are located less than one mile north of the Project area and are listed as impaired for aquatic life and aquatic recreation as a result of impairments for dissolved oxygen, chloride, E. coli, fish bioassessment, and benthic macroinvertebrates (Table 10; Figure 11, Appendix A). 20 MPCA, 2024. Minnesota’s Impaired Waters List. Available at: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/air-water-land-climate/minnesotas-impaired- waters-list. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 20 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 10. Impaired Waters within One Mile of the Project area Waterbody Name Section AUID1 Affected Designated Use Pollutant or Stressor TMDL2 ID Rush Creek T119N, R23W, S11 07010206-528 Aquatic Life, Aquatic Recreation Dissolved Oxygen, E. Coli, Fish Bioassessment, and benthic Macroinvertebrates PRJ06872-001 Rush Creek, South Fork 07010206-732 Aquatic Life, Aquatic Recreation Chloride, E. Coli, Fish Bioassessment, and benthic Macroinvertebrates PRJ06468-001, PRJ06872-001 1 Assessment Unit Identification (AUID) 2 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Floodway/Floodplain A review of the FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) identified one regulated floodway/floodplain located in the north portion of the Project area (Figure 13, Appendix A).20F21 The floodplain is associated with Rush Creek and is a 100-year floodplain (one percent annual chance of flooding. The proposed northern access road would trigger review and permitting because of the location relative to the floodplain. The stormwater management system would be constructed outside of the floodplain. ii. Groundwater – aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if Project is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. There are no known springs, seeps or karst features present in the Project area. A review of the MDH MWI identified one verified well within the Project area and five verified wells within a quarter-mile radius of the Project area. These wells are presented in Table 11 and Figure 10, Appendix A.21F22 Based on a review of the wells located near the Project area, the depth to static water level ranges from approximately 8 feet to 60 feet. Well log reports are included in Appendix B. 21 FEMA, 2020. National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) mapping tool. Accessed October 2024. 22 MDH, 2024. MWI Version 2.2.0. Available at: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/mwi/index.html. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 21 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 11. Verified Wells Within and Adjacent to the Project area Well ID Use Type Distance from Project Status Depth (ft.) Static Water Level (ft.) 331528 Abandoned Within Project area Sealed 36 15 331529 Environmental Borehole Approx. 100 ft E Sealed 36 33.7 559029 Domestic Approx. 500 ft NW Active 85 20 208988 Domestic Approx. 600 ft SE Active 359 60 738171 Domestic Approx. 800 ft SW Active 82 47 331530 Environmental Borehole Approx. 1,200 ft E Sealed 282 8.4 According to the MDH Source Water Protection Map22F23, the Project area is not within a MDH Wellhead Protection Area or a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). b. Describe effects from Project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. i. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. On behalf of the City of Corcoran, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) completed a feasibility study to evaluate infrastructure improvement recommendations. Sewer service for the proposed development would be via a tie-in to the existing 30-inch trunk sewer located along the east property boundary adjacent to CSAH 101. Appendix D includes the feasibility study report. In addition to the primary 30-inch trunk sewer, one 15-inch sewer stub would be installed to the west property boundary in accordance with City development policy to allow future service to adjacent parcels. In order to avoid overloading the City’s existing and planned wastewater infrastructure, the Proposer would be required to limit the total wastewater volume from the fully developed parcel to not more than 1,000 gallons per day per acre (gpd/acre). This is the volume of wastewater that has been planned for in the design of the Master Sewer Plan included in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and approved by Met Council. Permanent easements for the trunk and lateral sewers would be dedicated to the City. Where both sewer and potable water utilities are being installed in parallel, the easements must be wide enough to accommodate the required separation distance between sewer and potable water lines. 23 MDH, 2023. Source Water Protection Web Map Viewer. Available at: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/swp/mapviewer.html. Accessed September 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 22 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. If septic systems are part of the Project, describe the availability of septage disposal options within the region to handle the ongoing amounts generated as a result of the Project. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity and amount with this discussion. The Project does not propose to discharge to a SSTS. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the Project may influence the effects. The Project would not result in wastewater discharges to surface waters. ii. Stormwater - Describe changes in surface hydrology resulting from change of land cover. Describe the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the Project site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss environmental effects from stormwater discharges on receiving waters post construction including how the Project will affect runoff volume, discharge rate and change in pollutants. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity and amount with this discussion. For Projects requiring NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater permit coverage, state the total number of acres that will be disturbed by the Project and describe the stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), including specific best management practices to address soil erosion and sedimentation during and after Project construction. Discuss permanent stormwater management plans, including methods of achieving volume reduction to restore or maintain the natural hydrology of the site using green infrastructure practices or other stormwater management practices. Identify any receiving waters that have construction-related water impairments or are classified as special as defined in the Construction Stormwater permit. Describe additional requirements for special and/or impaired waters. Pre-Construction Stormwater Runoff Under existing conditions, the Project area primarily consists of agricultural land and wetlands. Surface water runoff drains towards existing wetland areas for the north portion, and to agricultural property to the west. No existing stormwater features are present within the existing Project area. Pollutants typically associated with agricultural areas include pesticides, sediment, nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) from fertilizers and typical agricultural practices. Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Although elimination of agriculture can benefit water quality by reducing export of nutrients and sediments through onsite ponding and filtration (Best Management Practices or BMPs), the construction of additional impervious surfaces, such as the roads, driveways, and building rooftops, increase the volume to nearby surface waters. The increased impervious surface areas would result in higher runoff rates, volumes, compared to the existing conditions, and change in pollutants; however, these changes would be mitigated and approved by the City and local watershed organization, the Elm Creek Water Management Commission (ECWMC). Stormwater BMPs would be constructed to mitigate stormwater runoff rate, volumes, and pollutant loading. It is anticipated that the Project would include a combination of wet ponds with sand filtration benches to provide both settling of sediment and sand filtration of stormwater before discharge. The Concept Site Plan shown in Figures section of the Feasibility Study (Appendix D) identifies the preliminary planned locations for the proposed stormwater BMPs. The proposed drainage design would be reviewed and approved by Corcoran Industrial Northeast 23 Environmental Assessment Worksheet both City and ECWMC as the Project design is developed and would comply with all applicable local and state regulatory requirements. A Construction SWPPP would be required for the NPDES permit issued by the MPCA. The SWPPP is prepared during final Project design and submitted for State approval prior to beginning construction of the Project. Project construction would adhere to the approved SWPPP and the City would inspect for compliance. The Project would also adhere to the City of Corcoran and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) stormwater requirements. Typical of urban development, erosion control would initially occur through temporary sediment basins with temporary ponds and seeded/vegetated ground cover where construction has paused, and perimeter control to avoid erosion and sedimentation throughout the site. Stockpiles would be stabilized when not in use and stockpile perimeter would be controlled. All permanent slopes 4:1 or steeper would have erosion control blankets installed. NPDES Section 23 of the General Stormwater Permit provides guidance on additional controls and conditions required for construction sites within one mile of an impaired water. Since the Project would disturb 50 or more acres, the SWPPP must be submitted to the MPCA 30 days prior to obtaining the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit. iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the Project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a MnDNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Discuss how the proposed water use is resilient in the event of changes in total precipitation, large precipitation events, drought, increased temperatures, variable surface water flows and elevations, and longer growing seasons. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. Describe contingency plans should the appropriation volume increase beyond infrastructure capacity or water supply for the Project diminish in quantity or quality, such as reuse of water, connections with another water source, or emergency connections. The water supply for the Project would be consistent with the City’s planned water supply for Northeast Corcoran. Under a contract to provide water service, the City of Maple Grove has been supplying potable water; however, Corcoran currently has a water treatment plant and water tower under construction, expected to be operational mid- year 2025. Maple Grove would serve as redundant supply. The Feasibility Study (Appendix D) documents results of the updated water system model with actual demands inserted from recent development. The site would be serviced by a 12-inch main from the south that is located at the property line. Average day pressures would be in the 71-74 psi when the industrial facility is built and remain at 71-74 when the ultimate system is built out. This is typical of water systems where the static pressure is consistent. Another analysis (peak hour pressures) shows that initially 68-70 psi can be provided and under ultimate buildout 59-62 psi is provided. This slight change is typical of urban developing communities where the pressure is slightly reduced under the ultimate buildout due to friction losses as the water moves through the system. Fire flow is initially at 2,500–2,800 gallons per minute and increases at ultimate buildout to 3,300 to 4,300 gpm. These values are within the range for municipal supply initially at ultimate buildout. The Feasibility Study (Appendix D) includes the summary of the watermain improvements recommended as part of this Project. The Feasibility Study Report, specifically Section 3.1, also speaks to the development’s dedication of property and coordination with the City for a future well site along the western portion of the development. The future City well would ultimately provide raw water to the City’s new water treatment plant. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 24 Environmental Assessment Worksheet iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the Project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed and identify those probable locations. The Project design sought to avoid and minimize wetland impacts; however, the Project would result in wetland impacts. Direct or indirect impacts are expected to Wetlands 1 and 4 because of the proposed access roads which would fill the wetlands or alter the hydrology to the wetlands (Figure 12, Appendix A). Direct impacts are expected to Wetland 5 because of the proposed stormwater basin which would alter the hydrology of the wetland. Anticipated wetland impacts could total up to 0.3 acres of the existing 21.1 acres of wetland within the Project area. Table 12 summarizes wetlands and their potential impact within the Project area. Minimization of impacts to wetlands would be evaluated as the Project design advances. Table 12. Impacts to Wetlands within the Project area Wetland ID* Circular 39 Cowardin Acres within Project area Potential Impact (acres impacted) Wetland 1 Type 1/3 PEM1Ad/PEM1C 13.73 0.03 Wetland 2 Type 1/5 PEM 1A/PUBH 1.36 0 Wetland 3 Type 1/3/5 PEM1A/PEM1Cd/PABHx 5.73 0 Wetland 4 - - 0.21 0.21 Wetland 5 Type 1 PEM1A 0.03 0.03 Total Acreages 21.06 0.27 All necessary wetland permitting would be obtained prior to any wetland impacts occurring. Impacts would be regulated under WCA as administered by the City of Corcoran as the WCA Local Governmental Unit (LGU). Additionally, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps of Engineers or Corps) would regulate impacts to jurisdictional wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Any wetland impacts requiring mitigation would be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio through the purchase of wetland bank credits. Credits would be purchased from an appropriate wetland bank following the current siting prioritization in the WCA rules Corcoran Industrial Northeast 25 Environmental Assessment Worksheet The City of Corcoran must approve the proposed wetland impacts and plan for replacement before any impacts occur. Additionally, the Corps of Engineers must issue a jurisdictional determination. If any of the impacted wetlands are Corps jurisdictional, a Section 404 permit would be required. The wetland impacts are expected to have minimal effect on the host watershed, as the total impact area is not large, and the existing wetlands are low quality farmed wetlands or small seasonally flooded basins. The replacement wetlands in the wetland bank would be higher quality wetlands and better able to provide ecosystem services than the existing, low quality wetlands. Wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage would be clearly identified and labeled If existing vegetation is proposed to be used as a wetland buffer; these areas would be reviewed with the City of Corcoran wetland specialist to determine if they are viable candidates. b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the Project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/ sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the Project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and Projected watercraft usage. There are no anticipated direct impacts or alterations to surface water features as a result of the Project. Overland water discharges to two large wetland complexes to the north and southwest including public water 27031900 in the southwest. Receiving waters would be evaluated to understand any impacts from additional volume. The stormwater management described in Item 12.b.ii would be in place to avoid impacts to downstream surface waters. Appropriate BMPs such as silt fences, inlet protection, and other sediment and erosion control measures would be taken as needed to avoid and minimize sedimentation in downstream waterbodies. The Project would not change the number or type of watercraft on any local waterbodies. 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes a. Pre-Project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the Project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre-Project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by Project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted for the Project area in March of 2024. An abandoned farmstead, likely developed prior to 1909 and abandoned in the mid-2000s, was identified in a wooded area in the southeastern portion of the Project area. The Phase I ESA identified the following recognized environmental conditions (RECs) associated with the Project area: solid waste and debris (55-gallon drums, a car, used oil filters, etc.) observed in addition to dilapidated buildings associated with an abandoned farmstead on the Project area and a 500-gallon aboveground storage tank (AST) to the west of the farmstead area. The AST was observed on metal supports with no secondary containment in place beneath it. It was concluded that there is a Corcoran Industrial Northeast 26 Environmental Assessment Worksheet potential for inadvertent spills, leaks or overfills to have occurred associated with the AST, and potential soil contamination and/or buried debris may be present based on the type of solid debris observed in the abandoned farmstead area. The Phase I ESA did not identify controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs) or historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs) associated with the Project area. The Phase I ESA identified two additional consideration items which include the identification of what appeared to be a sealed well located near a dilapidated house in the abandoned farmstead area, the potential for other wells, and the likely presence of a septic system associated with the abandoned farmstead based on the age of construction. The second additional consideration item was the potential for buried debris or foundations to be present in the Project area. A Phase II ESA was conducted on the Project area in May 2024 to evaluate whether soil and/or soil vapor have been impacted based on the findings of the Phase I ESA. The Phase II investigation including seven test pits, two soil borings, and two soil vapor probes with four soil samples and two vapor samples collected. Soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), diesel range organics (DRO), gasoline range organics (GRO), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and/or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals. Vapor samples were collected for laboratory analysis of VOCs. The soil borings were advanced in the area of the AST or within the proposed stormwater pond area, test pits were completed in the abandoned farmstead area or where surficial debris was identified, and soil vapor probes were advanced near the abandoned farmstead area where the proposed warehouse location would be. Soil borings were completed to a depth of 30 feet below ground surface (bgs), and test pits were completed to a depth of five or ten feet bgs. Surficial soil identified at the Project area included clayey sand or silty sand with groundwater not identified to 30 feet bgs. Field observations and analytical testing of the soils in the area of the AST and abandoned farmstead did not find evidence of buried debris or significant impacts to the subsurface soils in that area; however, based on the historical site use and the stormwater pond excavation proposed in this area, the potential exists for unexpected environmental conditions to be encountered during redevelopment. A test pit completed in the north portion of the Project area identified buried debris to a depth of two feet bgs, and analytical testing of the debris laden soils identified elevated concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead exceeding their respective MPCA Commercial/Industrial Soil Reference Values (SRVs). Based on the concentrations of lead and cadmium detected in this soil sample, follow-up toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis was requested and completed to facilitate potential future waste profiling for the soil. Additional investigation has been completed to better understand the soil conditions relative to proposed soil excavation and has been incorporated into the Response Action Plan (RAP) and Construction Contingency Plan (CCP) that are described below. Limited soil vapor sampling was conducted to evaluate the area between the proposed building and the abandoned farmstead. Various VOCs were detected in the samples; however, the detected concentrations were not at levels that exceed their respective MPCA 33x Commercial/Industrial Intrusion Screening Values (ISVs). Based on these results, it does not appear that releases in the vicinity of the former farmstead have impacted vapor at actionable levels. A draft RAP and CCP has been prepared to provide procedures for the management of contaminated soils that would be encountered during redevelopment and to provide a plan to evaluate and manage other environmental issues that may arise during redevelopment. In addition to the Phase I and Phase II ESA’s, a review of MPCA’s What’s in My Neighborhood (WIMN) database23F24 was conducted to identify documented potentially contaminated sites within or in 24 MPCA, 2024. What’s in My Neighborhood. Available at: What's in My Neighborhood | Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (state.mn.us). Accessed October 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast 27 Environmental Assessment Worksheet the vicinity of the Project area. No sites were identified within the Project area; however, three sites were identified within one-quarter mile of the Project area. Table 13 summarizes these findings and Figure 14; Appendix A illustrates the location of potentially contaminated sites in close proximity to the Project. Table 13. MPCA Potentially Contaminated Sites within One-Quarter Mile of the Project area Site ID Site Name MPCA Program Status Location 117115 Tree Farm Landscape Underground Tanks (TS0017488) Inactive (Registered from 1993 to 1998) Directly east of Project area 197398 Tree Farm Landscape Investigation and Cleanup - Petroleum Remediation Leak Site (LS0012015) Inactive (Leak reported in 1998, Remedial Investigation Report in 2001) Approx. 600 ft east of Project area 236833 Nelson International Construction Stormwater (C00058336)) Inactive (Coverage from 2020-2023) Approx. 600 ft south of Project area An additional review of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) WIMN database24F25 was conducted to identify documented potentially contaminated sites within or in the vicinity of the Project area. No MDA spill or release sites were identified within the Project area or withing a quarter-mile radius. The Phase II ESA identified an area with RCRA metal impacts on the north portion of the Project area, and the Phase I ESA indicated that potential buried debris could be identified during redevelopment activities. Based on the identified impacts, a RAP and CCP have been prepared. The report would detail the response actions to be undertaken during the redevelopment and provide field decisions-making guidance in the event unanticipated impacts are encountered during redevelopment activities. Any contaminated soils or other potentially hazardous materials encountered during construction would be handled and disposed of in accordance with MPCA and any other applicable requirements. b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the Project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. Construction waste Construction wastes would be typical to the construction of new structures, infrastructure, roadways and parking areas. Construction wastes would be primarily non-hazardous and would be managed as municipal solid waste (MSW) or construction/demolition debris. Hazardous wastes in the form of used oils/lubricants, waste paints, or other materials may be generated during construction. The contractor would be required to manage and dispose of all construction- generated wastes in accordance with MPCA requirements and all other applicable regulatory requirements. Construction wastes would either be recycled or stored in approved containers and disposed of in the proper facilities. Any excess soil material that is not suitable for use onsite would become the property of the contractor and would be disposed of properly. All solid waste would be managed according to MPCA and other regulatory requirements. Construction waste would result from demolition of three dilapidated buildings and remaining foundation 25 MDA, 2024. What’s in my Neighborhood? – Agricultural. Available at: What's In My Neighborhood (arcgis.com) Accessed October 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast 28 Environmental Assessment Worksheet associated with the abandoned farmstead in the southeast of the Project area. Solid wastes generated from the demolition of the existing structures would be disposed of as construction/demolition debris at a permitted landfill. Operational waste The Project would generate solid waste during operation of the development, which will include primarily warehousing and corporate officing activities. Solid waste generated by the warehouse and offices would primarily be managed as mixed municipal waste. The California Department of Resource Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) provides a list of estimated solid waste generation rates for office, industrial, service, and other establishments for general planning purposes.25F 26 It is estimated that the waste generated by the warehouse would be composed of 100 percent municipal solid waste. Based on estimated solid waste generation rates of 6.0 lbs per employee per day for corporate office and 13.82 lbs waste per employee per day for warehousing employees, and applying these rates to the number of employees (a 20%/80% split or 200 for office and 800 for warehousing), it is estimated that the Project would yield a total waste generation rate of 1,282 tons per year. The collection of MSW would be managed by a licensed waste hauler. The Project would adhere to all MPCA requirements and other regulations pertaining to the use, handling, and disposal of solid waste. Recycling areas would be provided in compliance with the Minnesota State Building code. c. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the Project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any new above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Indicate the number, location, size and age of existing tanks on the property that the Project will use. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. The Project is not anticipated to include permanent chemicals/hazardous materials storage or use during its operation. No aboveground or underground storage tanks are planned for permanent use within the Project area. If this changes, a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) plan would be prepared by a licensed Minnesota Professional Engineer pursuant to federal regulations. Hazardous waste may be generated during Project construction from demolition of the existing buildings and remaining foundation. If encountered, regulated materials such as asbestos, lights, and other regulated wastes would be abated and properly disposed of at a permitted facility. A pre-demolition hazardous materials survey would be completed prior to the start of demolition activities. If any regulated materials such as asbestos-containing materials, lead-based paint and other regulated materials/wastes are present, an abatement plan would be prepared to address removal and proper disposal of regulated materials identified in the hazardous materials survey. If required, a comprehensive abatement closeout report would be prepared following abatement and demolition activities, which would document the removal, management, and disposal of any regulated materials. Construction equipment may require the limited use of potentially hazardous materials, such as gasoline or diesel fuels, engine motor oils, hydraulic fluids, and other lubricants. Vehicles responsible for the transportation of hazardous materials would be equipped with spill kits for rapid response to any spills and refueling procedures would be implemented to eliminate leakage. Additionally, all fuels, oils, and lubricants would be stored in containment apparatuses while not in use. Construction staff would be trained to spot and appropriately respond to potential spills. In the event that a leak or spill incident occurs, the contractor would be required to respond in accordance with MPCA containment and remedial action procedures. A SPCC plan would be prepared by a Minnesota Professional Engineer pursuant to federal regulations. 26 CalRecycle. 2019. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Available at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates Accessed September 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 29 Environmental Assessment Worksheet d. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the Project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling It is not anticipated that the Project would generate or require storage of hazardous wastes during its construction or operation. Item 13.c. describes the potential storage and use of hazardous materials during construction and operation of the Project. If hazardous waste is generated by the post-construction facility, proper storage and handling would occur onsite, and the facilities would adhere to county and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for disposal. Various construction materials that are regulated by the MPCA and the EPA may be present within the buildings currently in the Project area. In accordance with requirements by the MPCA and EPA, the buildings under consideration for demolition may require a comprehensive survey conducted to identify accessible suspect asbestos-containing material (ACM) and other regulated materials as defined by the MPCA. If needed, asbestos abatement activities in the Project area would follow rules and regulations by the State of Minnesota and the EPA. The MPCA allows, without sampling, disposal of demolition debris that may contain Lead Based Paint (LBP) coatings. Therefore, if a building is scheduled for demolition, suspect LBP coatings do not require sampling. In addition, the MPCA allows, without sampling, disposal of demolition debris that may contain polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-containing caulks, sealants and coatings. Therefore, if a building was constructed after 1979 or is scheduled for demolition, suspect PCB- containing caulks do not require sampling. A final report documenting the findings of the survey shall be completed. Based on the findings of the building survey, if a Project specification is generated, it must be written by an MDH accredited Asbestos Project Designer. 14. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. The Project is located within the Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (222), the Minnesota and Northeast Morainal Section (222M), and the Big Woods Subsection (222Mb) as defined by the MnDNR in the Field Guide to Native Plant Communities of Minnesota – The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province.26F27 Current land use within this subsection primarily consists of cropland and pasture with some remaining upland forest and wetland. Historically, the subsection consisted largely of oak woodland and maple-basswood forest.27F28,28F29 The land cover within the Project area was reviewed and is described in Item 8 and Table 3. Figure 4, Appendix A illustrates the land cover types within the Project area based on geospatial data. The mixed forest, brush/grassland, cropland, wetlands, and ponds may provide nesting, foraging, and/or travel habitat for a variety of urban wildlife species, including passerine birds, raptors, squirrels, rabbits, deer, coyotes, foxes, and other small mammals. Suitable roosting habitat for bats may be present within the limited forested areas. Wetlands and ponds within the Project area may also provide habitat for aquatic and semi-aquatic species, such as turtles, fish, frogs, salamanders, and toads. b. Describe rare features state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA- ) and/or correspondence number (MCE ) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage Review letter from the MnDNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the 27 Aaseng, N., 2005. Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota – The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province. St. Paul: DNR. 28 MnDNR, 1999. Minnesota Geospatial Commons – Ecological Sections of Minnesota. Available at: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/geos- ecological-class-system. Accessed October 2024. 29 MnDNR, 2000. Ecological Classification System. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/ecs/index.html. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 30 Environmental Assessment Worksheet results. Under Stantec’s Limited License to Use Copyrighted Material (LA 2022-023) related to Rare Features Data, the MnDNR Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) was searched in October 2024 to identify species within a one-mile buffer of the Project area. The NHIS search did not identify any records within the Project area or within a one-mile buffer of the Project area. A formal NHIS review request (MCE No. 2024-00852) was submitted to the MnDNR through the Minnesota Conservation Explorer (MCE) system and a final letter was received on October 11, 2024. According to this response, further review by the Natural Heritage Review Team is not needed for state-listed threatened and endangered species or ecologically significant areas. Appendix E provides a copy of the MnDNR MCE response letter. Native Plant Communities and Sites of Biodiversity Significance Based on a review of the MnDNR MCE portal,29F30 no native plant communities, calcareous fens, Minnesota Biological Survey (MBS) sites, or lakes of biological significance are located within the Project area. State – Listed Species The NHIS search did not identify any records of rare species within the Project area or within one mile of the Project area. Federally – Listed Species A review of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool30F31 was conducted in October 2024 to identify federally listed species, those species proposed for federal listing, and candidates for federal listing with the potential to occur within the Project area. Four species were identified from this review: the salamander mussel (Simpsonaias ambigua; proposed endangered), the western regal fritillary (Argynnis idalia occidentalis; proposed threatened), the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus; candidate), and the whooping crane (Grus americana; non-essential experimental population). Appendix E provides a copy of the IPaC results. Salamander mussel The salamander mussel is restricted to the lower St. Croix River in Minnesota but was once also found in the Mississippi River. This species is only found under flat rocks or under ledges of rock walls, which is habitat that is also occupied by its glochidial host, the mudpuppy salamander (Necturus masculosus).31F32 The Project area does not overlap and is not within the vicinity of the St Croix River or the Mississippi River. As such, impacts on the salamander mussel as a result of the Project are not anticipated. Western regal fritillary The western regal fritillary is associated throughout its range in upland and wetland native prairies. Regal fritillary larvae appear to be restricted to upland prairie where they feed exclusively on the nectar of violets (Viola spp.), such as prairie bird’s-foot violet (Viola palmata var. pedatifida) and bird’s-foot violet (V. pedata), the latter of which is utilized in the southeast section of the state.32F33 The Project area does not contain any native prairie habitat according to a review of the MnDNR MCE portal. As such, impacts on the western regal fritillary are not anticipated as a result of the Project. Monarch butterfly The monarch butterfly is a migratory butterfly that exists in two main populations within the United States 30 MnDNR. undated(d). Minnesota Conservation Explorer. Available at: https://mce.dnr.state.mn.us/. Accessed October 2024. 31 USFWS, 2024. Information for Planning and Consultation. Available at: https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/. Accessed October 2024. 32 MnDNR, undated(e). Rare Species Guide: Simpsonaias ambigua. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=IMBIV41010. Accessed October 2024. 33 MnDNR, 2018. Rare Species Guide: Argynnis idalia. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=IILEPJ6040. Accessed August 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 31 Environmental Assessment Worksheet divided by the Rocky Mountains: the eastern population that overwinters in the mountains of Mexico, and the western population that overwinters along the southern pacific coast of California.33F34 Monarch butterflies are a widespread species found in fields, prairies, savannahs, and most places where their host plant milkweed (Asclepias spp.) occurs throughout the United States and southern Canada. This species generally occurs in areas with high densities of native nectar sources. During late summer and migration, adults use nectar species such as black-eyed Susan (Rudbeckia hirta), narrow-leaved coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia), and rough blazing star (Liatris aspera).34F35 However, the presence of milkweed is required as it is the only plant on which monarch caterpillars can feed.35F36 Given the wide range of habitats the monarch butterfly can occupy, it may occur within the Project area, especially if milkweed is present. The use of native seed mixes in the Project area as part of the restoration process would enhance the habitat for the monarch butterfly. Whooping crane The whooping crane is a migratory bird species that once nested in northern prairies, but now breeds in remote northern forests in Canada as well as in an experimental population in Wisconsin, preferably within coniferous habitat containing swamps and nearby lakes or ponds. Winter habitat consists of coastal marshes (e.g., Texas, Louisiana, and Florida).36F37 The Project area does not contain prairie or coniferous forest habitat preferred by the whooping crane. Additionally, the Project area is located within the Mississippi Flyway while the wild population of whooping crane utilizes the Central Flyway located further west. Any unlikely occurrence of a whooping crane within the Project area would, therefore, likely be from the experimental population in Wisconsin that is not federally regulated. As such, impacts to this species as a result of the Project are not anticipated. Migratory birds Fourteen migratory bird species listed as USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and one eagle species have the potential to occur within the Project area according to the USFWS IPaC review (Appendix E). These species and their habitat requirements are detailed in Table 14 using data from the Cornell Lab of Ornithology.37F38 Table 14. Migratory Birds Listed as BCC with the Potential to Occur within the Project area Common Name Scientific Name Nesting, Foraging, and/or Migration Habitat Bald eagle1 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Forested areas (conifers and deciduous trees) near large bodies of open water. Open uplands near open water in winter. Black tern Chlidonias niger surinamenisis Large (>50 acres), dense marshes for breeding. Lagoons, river edges, lakes, marshes, and beaches during migration. Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Breeds in open areas (grasslands, tallgrass and mixed prairie, hayfields, meadows); coastal areas pre-migration. 34 USDA Forest Service. undated(a). Migration and Overwintering. Available at: https://www.fs.fed.us/wildflowers/pollinators/Monarch_Butterfly/migration/. Accessed November 2021. 35 MnDNR, 2022(b). Butterfly Gardens. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/gardens/butterfly/index.html. Accessed October 2024. 36 National Wildlife Federation. undated. Monarch Butterfly. Available at: https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife- Guide/Invertebrates/Monarch-Butterfly. Accessed October 2024. 37 Audubon, undated. Guide to North American Birds: Whooping Crane. Available at: https://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/whooping- crane. Accessed September 2022. 38 Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2024. All About Birds. Ithaca, New York. Available at: https://www.allaboutbirds.org/news/#. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 32 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Common Name Scientific Name Nesting, Foraging, and/or Migration Habitat Canada warbler Cardellina canadensis Breeds in mixed conifer and deciduous forest with mossy/shrubby understory near water. Shrubby areas in parks, woodlots, and along forest edges during migration. Cerulean warbler Setophaga cerulea Breeds in mature deciduous forests with tall trees. Chimney swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds in rural and urban settings in chimneys, tree cavities, and caves. Forages over open habitats, forests, ponds, and residential areas. Golden-winged warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Breeds in open woodlands, wet thickets, shrub, tamarack bogs, aspen or willow stands, and wetlands. Grasshopper sparrow Ammodramus savannarum perpallidus Grasslands, prairies, hayfields, and open pastures with little scrub and some bare ground. Henslow’s sparrow Centronyx henslowii Breeds in wet meadows, weedy pastures, lowland prairie, and cultivated hayfields. Lesser yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Breeds in open woodlands with marshes, bogs, and/or ponds; during migration found in fresh and brackish wetlands. Pectoral sandpiper Calidris melanotos Breeds in wet coastal tundra. Migrants are found in wet, grassy environments, including sewage ponds, plowed farm fields, sod farms, rice fields, flooded golf courses, and fresh and saltwater marshes with grassy cover. Red-headed woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds in mature deciduous woodlands that contain dead or dying trees that can act as nest cavities. Oak, oak-hickory, maple, ash, and beech are often used in the northern portion of their range. Rusty blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds in wet forests, fens, bogs, muskeg, and beaver ponds. Semipalmated sandpiper Calidris pusilla Migrants coming through Minnesota would use mudflats, lakeshores, sewage ponds, wetlands, beaches, sandbars, and freshwater impoundments. Wood thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds in mature deciduous and mixed forests with trees over 50 feet tall, a moderate understory, open forest floor with moist soil and decaying leaf litter, and nearby water. 1 This species is not listed as BBC but warrants special attention under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA). Source: Cornell Lab of Ornithology 2024 Corcoran Industrial Northeast 33 Environmental Assessment Worksheet One migratory bird species identified during the IPaC review, the bald eagle, has the potential to occur in the Project area. This species is not listed as BCC but warrants special attention under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA). The forested areas, wetlands, ponds, and nearby lakes may provide suitable nesting sites and foraging habitat for the bald eagle. A large stick nest with the potential to support a nesting pair of bald eagles was identified on aerial imagery and field verified in October 2024. At the time of the field visit, the nest appeared to be inactive. The nest is located just past the northern boundary of the Project area, approximately 900 ft from the Project’s disturbance area. All Project activities would avoid the regulated 660-ft buffer area required by USFWS guidelines. The forested areas, brush/grassland, cropland, wetlands, and ponds within and in the immediate vicinity of the Project area may provide nesting, foraging, and/or migration stopover habitat for all fourteen of the BCC species listed in Table 15. c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the Project including how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the Project may influence the effects. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the Project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. Impacts Analysis for Native Plant Communities and Sites of Biodiversity Significance No native plant communities, calcareous fens, MBS sites, or lakes of biological significance were identified within the Project area or within one mile of the Project area during the review of the MnDNR MCE portal in October 2024. The final MnDNR MCE response letter (Appendix E) received on October 11, 2024 also had no comments regarding ecologically significant areas. As such, no impacts are anticipated for these resources as a result of the Project. Impacts Analysis for State-Listed Species No records of rare species were identified within the Project area or within one mile of the Project area during the NHIS review conducted in October 2024. The final MnDNR MCE response letter (Appendix E) received on October 11, 2024 also had no comments regarding state-listed species. As such, no impacts are anticipated on these resources as a result of the Project. Impacts Analysis for Federally-Listed Species Salamander mussel Suitable habitat for the salamander mussel (the St Croix River or Mississippi River) is not present within or in the vicinity of the Project area. As such, no impacts are anticipated for this species as a result of the Project. Freshwater mussels are threatened by several factors, including climate change. It has been observed that warmer water temperatures lead to increased stress, slower heart rate, and decreased burrowing activity in both adult and juvenile mussels, resulting in an increased risk of predation.38F39 Western regal fritillary Suitable habitat for the western regal fritillary (native prairie) is not present within the Project area. As such, no impacts are anticipated for this species as a result of the Project. 39 Kwak, T.J., Bales, J.D., Newton, T., Cope, W.G., Heise, R.J., and Karns, B.N., 2009. Modeling the response of freshwater mussels to changes in water temperature, habitat, and streamflow. Retrieved from United States Geological Survey (USGS) Climate Adaptation Science Centers (CASC) Project Explorer: https://cascprojects.org/#/project/5050cb0ee4b0be20bb30eac0/4f833d7be4b0e84f608680d1. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 34 Environmental Assessment Worksheet The western regal fritillary relies on violets for their life cycle and their abundance is closely linked to violet density39F40,40F41. With an increase in more intense storms and droughts in Minnesota, invasive species are likely to become more dominant and push violet numbers down, thus furthering the decline of western regal fritillary habitat.41F42 Monarch butterfly Given the wide range of habitats the monarch butterfly can occupy, it may occur within the Project area, especially if milkweed is present. The removal and damage of vegetation could result in habitat loss for the monarch butterfly as well as potential individual fatalities. The monarch butterfly is a candidate for federal listing and is not currently regulated by the USFWS; therefore, impacts should be reassessed if and when a listing status is finalized. As discussed in Item 7, climate change is anticipated to result in increasing temperatures in Minnesota, which may increase the number of days and the area in which monarch butterfly populations would be exposed to unsuitably high temperatures. This can result in this species using up fat stores too quickly and may result in a misjudgment of when to enter and exit states of diapause (dormancy).42F43 Whooping crane Impacts on the whooping crane are not anticipated due to the lack of suitable habitat (prairie or coniferous forest) within the Project area. The Project area is also not within the range of the wild population of whooping crane; any unlikely occurrences of this species within the Project area would likely be from the unregulated experimental population based in Wisconsin. Based on models that consider various climate factors, it has been predicted that climate change may impact the juvenile recruitment and population growth of the whooping crane. For instance, increased precipitation during fall migration and the breeding season indicated lower recruitment and increased atmospheric carbon dioxide indicated lower population growth rates and recruitment.43F44 Impacts Analysis for Migratory Birds Construction activities and development within the Project area may result in the take of migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The MBTA makes it illegal to take (i.e., to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct) any migratory bird, or the parts, nests, or eggs of such a bird except under the terms of a valid permit issued pursuant to Federal regulations. Although the provisions of the MBTA are applicable throughout the year, most migratory bird nesting activity in Minnesota occurs approximately from May 15 to August 1. Based on the IPaC species review (Appendix E), the fourteen migratory bird species listed as USFWS BCC and one eagle species with the potential to occur in the Project area are most likely to be nesting in the Project area from March 15 to September 10. This comes with the exception of the bald eagle that is most likely to be present from December 1 to August 31 as well as the lesser yellowlegs, pectoral sandpiper, rusty blackbird, and semipalmated sandpiper that breed elsewhere. If construction activities occur within vegetated areas of the Project area, it may result in impacts to these and other migratory bird species. No impacts to the nest identified near the Project area are anticipated as the disturbance area does not intersect with the regulated 660-ft buffer. 40 Debinski, D. M., & Kelly, L. 1998. Decline of Iowa populations of the regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia) Drury. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS, 105(1), 16-22. Accessed October 2024. 41 Beilfuss, K. G., & Harrington, J. A., 2001. Distribution patterns of the Regal Fritillary butterfly (Speyeria idalia Drury) within a Wisconsin dry prairie remnant. In Proc N Am Prairie Conference (Vol. 17, pp. 191-196). Accessed October 2024. 42 Ratcliffe, Hugh. 2020. Climate Change and Tallgrass Prairies: Exploring the Interaction of Extreme Weather and Invasion in Managed Prairie Systems. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/261977. Accessed October 2024. 43 Kobilinksy, Dana. 2019. Watch: Temperature Drives Internal Clock for Monarchs. The Wildlife Society. Available at: https://wildlife.org/watch-temperature-drives-internal-clock-for-monarchs/. Accessed October 2024. 44 Butler, M. J., Metzger, K. L., & Harris, G. M., 2017. Are whooping cranes destined for extinction? Climate change imperils recruitment and population growth. Ecology and Evolution, 7(8), 2821-2834. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 35 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Impacts Analysis for Urban Wildlife Urban wildlife may be impacted by the development of the Project area, such as through the removal of trees, brush/grassland, wetlands, and ponds. Additionally, lighting and noise associated with construction have the potential to negatively impact wildlife. These species are generally adaptable to change and would likely relocate to other undeveloped areas. Invasive Species Noxious weeds and invasive species in Minnesota are managed through the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) under Minnesota Statutes Section 18.78, the MnDNR, and local ordinances. The use of best management practices during construction activities and operation within the Project area should be implemented to minimize the introduction or spread of noxious weeds and invasive species. These practices include cleaning vehicles and equipment of mud and dirt, removing seeds that attach to clothing or equipment, minimizing soil disturbance, not moving potentially contaminated materials between sites, and staying on designated roads/trails.44F45, 45F46 d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, ecosystems, and sensitive ecological resources. Sightings of any rare species during development within the Project area should be reported to the MnDNR Nongame Wildlife specialist. The Proposer would follow the guidance that is received to avoid impacts. Native seed should be considered in revegetation plans within the Project area for areas not proposed to be mowed turf grass or impervious surface in order to provide suitable habitat for pollinator species, such as the monarch butterfly, and to prevent the spread of invasive species and noxious weeds. Utilizing native seed mixes in revegetation plans may create a net positive in pollinator habitat compared to existing conditions. Herbicide, fungicide, and insecticide use within the Project area should be minimized to the extent practicable. If the application of these products is necessary during construction or operation within the Project area, then application should be limited to targeted outbreaks and would be targeted toward the nuisance species. Invasive species prevention measures should be implemented during construction to prevent the movement of invasive species on trucks, heavy equipment, off-highway vehicles, and equipment and tools to reduce the likelihood of introducing invasive species from off site. Measures may include requiring contractors and others working on site to arrive and leave with clean equipment free of visible plants, seeds, mud, and dirt clods. Other measures may include using weed-free seed and mulch products and avoiding the re-use of the top six inches of stockpiled materials (mulch, soil, gravel) that may contain more weed seeds. The results of the MnDNR NHIS review are typically valid for one year. The NHIS database should be consulted prior to the commencement of construction activities within the Project area to identify any new records of rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, or other natural features within the Project’s vicinity. 45 USDA National Invasives Species Information Center. undated(b). Best Management Practices. Available at: https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/subject/best-management-practices. Accessed October 2024. 46 MnDNR, 2024(b). Terrestrial Invasive Species. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/invasives/terrestrial/index.html. Accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 36 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 15. Historic Properties Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during Project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. Stantec reviewed the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (MnSHPO) previous survey report data as well as the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) Portal and the Minnesota State Historic Inventory Portal in September 2024. The literature search focused on previously identified cultural resources (archaeological sites and architectural properties) within the literature search Study Area, defined as the Project area plus a 1-mile buffer. In addition, Stantec reviewed archival resources including General Land Office (GLO) maps, county atlases, the University of Minnesota Borchert Map Library, Trygg maps, and historical aerial imagery to identify potential cultural features in the Project area. The MnModel, available on the OSA online portal, shows that the Project is located within a well surveyed area with low site potential and a poorly surveyed area with unknown site potential; however, smaller sections are mapped within a well surveyed area with high site potential. The MnModel is a data set that focuses on the number and distribution of archaeological sites and surveys, the resolution of environmental data, and the degree to which the environmental data represents the historic and prehistoric landscape to determine the probability of encountering an archaeological site. The summation of data results in four zones depicted on the map: a high sensitivity area where archaeological sites are more likely, a medium sensitivity area where sites are less likely, a low sensitivity area where sites are unlikely, and an unknown site potential in areas that have been poorly surveyed. No previously conducted archaeological surveys overlap with the Project area. Two previously conducted archaeological surveys, with the same survey boundary, overlap the Study Area (see Table 15). Table 15. Previously Conducted Archaeological Surveys in the Study Area Survey ID Title Author/Year HE-2001-04 Report on Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Conducted for the West TH 610 and East TH 610 Alternative Urban Areawide Reviews (AUARs), City of Maple Grove, Hennepin County, Minnesota Harrison/2001 HE-2005-01 Cultural Resource Investigation Conducted Along Proposed Elm Creek Interceptor Extensions – Dayton-Hassan Branch, Hassan Township and Cities of Dayton and Maple Grove, Hennepin County, Minnesota Harrison/2005 No previously recorded archaeological sites are located within the Project area. Three previously recorded archaeological sites are located in the Study Area (see Table 16). Sites 21HE0511 and 21HE0512 both represent single artifact findspots and are considered not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Site 21HE0578 is a burial site for two individuals and has not been evaluated for listing on the NRHP. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 37 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 16. Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites within the Study Area Site Number Site Name Site Type Cultural Affiliation NRHP Status 21HE0511 Schany I Single Artifact Unknown Precontact Not Eligible 21HE0512 Schany II Single Artifact Unknown Precontact Not Eligible 21HE0578 Roeder Children Burial Burial Site/Cemetery Historic Euro- American/German- American Unevaluated No previously identified burial sites/cemeteries are recorded in the Project area. Four previously identified burial sites/cemeteries are recorded within the Study Area, all of which are historic cemeteries which have not been evaluated for listing on the NRHP (see Table 17). The Roeder Children Burial corresponds with previously recorded archaeological site 21HE0578. The four cemeteries in the Study Area are protected through MS 307.08. Table 17. Previously Identified Burial Sites and Cemeteries within the Study Area Name Type NRHP Status South Maple Grove Cemetery Cemetery Unevaluated Koelher Family Cemetery Cemetery Unevaluated Immanual United Methodist Cemetery Cemetery Unevaluated Roeder Children Burial Burial Site/Cemetery Unevaluated No previously identified above ground historic resources are recorded in the Project area. There are 18 previously identified above ground historic resources recorded in the Study Area; 11 of which are considered not eligible for listing in the NRHP and seven are unevaluated (see Table 18). Table 18. Previously Identified Above Ground Historic Resources within the Study Area Resource No. Name Resource Type Address/Location NRHP Status HE-COC- 00002 Farmstead Building 9975 Highway 101 N. Unevaluated HE-COC- 00003 Farmstead Building 19301 Steig Rd. Unevaluated HE-COC- 00004 Farmstead Building 10700 Co. Hwy. 116 Unevaluated HE-COC- 00040 Maple Grove United Methodist Church Building 10025 Highway 101 Unevaluated HE-COC- 00084 House Building 19900 Hillside Drive Not Eligible HE-DYC-00016 Bridge 27946 Structure 2.7 MI SE of JCT TH 101 (carries Brockton Lane over I- 94) Unevaluated HE-DYC-00017 House Building 18130 Territorial Rd Not Eligible HE-DYC-00019 Farmstead Building 11150 Brockton Ln N Not Eligible Corcoran Industrial Northeast 38 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Resource No. Name Resource Type Address/Location NRHP Status HE-DYC-00020 Farmstead Building 11030 Holly Ln N Not Eligible HE-DYC-00021 Farmstead Building 18660 County Rd 81 Not Eligible HE-DYC-00022 Farmstead Building 18950 Territorial Rd Not Eligible HE-DYC-00023 Private Bridge Structure Farm lane over Rush Creek east of Brockton Ln Not Eligible HE-DYC-00026 D. Chase House Building 17801 Territorial Rd Unevaluated HE-MGC- 00004 Leonard Radintz Farmstead Building 17690 101st Ave. N. Unevaluated HE-MGC- 00112 Bridge L8084 Structure MSAS 130 over RUSH CREEK S FORK Not Eligible HE-RGC- 00015 House Building 11215 Brockton Ln N Not Eligible HE-RGC- 00023 Farmstead Building 19151 Territorial Rd Not Eligible XX-ROD- 00185 US Trunk Highway 52 Structure Unknown Not Eligible Historic Maps, Atlases, and Aerial Photographs Wetlands appear surrounding the Project area on the original 1855 GLO survey map.46F47 No notable structures or features appear within the Project area on the Trygg map, which is based off the original land survey notes from 1855; the northeast corner of the Project area is labeled as marsh.47F48Two structures are mapped in the Project area on the 1873 plat map of Corcoran Township, one in the NE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 1 and the other in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 1. Additionally, wetlands are indicated along the north edge of the Project area.48F49 On the 1898 plat map of Corcoran Township and the 1916 State of Minnesota plat map, one structure is mapped within the Project area in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 1. 49F50,50F51 No structures or notable features are indicated within the Project area on the 1913 Hennepin County Atlas.51F52 47 General Land Office (GLO), 1855. Original Survey, MN, 5th PM, T119N – R23W. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/survey/default.aspx?dm_id=232242&sid=esv0ej4t.mer#surveyDetailsTabIndex=1, accessed October 2024. 48 Trygg, J. William Sr., 1964. Composite Map of United States Land Surveyors’’ Original Plats and Field Notes – Sheet 7. Trygg Land Office, Ely, Minnesota. Accessed October 2024. 49 Wright, George B., 1873. Hennepin County Atlas. St. Paul Lithographic and Engraving Company, St. Paul Minnesota. https://collection.mndigital.org/catalog/mhs:865#?xywh=4778%2C-54%2C1012%2C747&cv=24, accessed October 2024. 50 Dahl, Peter M., 1898. Plat Book of Hennepin County, Corcoran Township. Northwester Map Publishing Company: E. P. Noll & Company, https://cdm16022.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/mhs/id/1260, accessed October 2024. 51 State of Minnesota, 1916. Plat Book of the State of Minnesota. Borchert Map Library, Minneapolis, MN. Electronic Document. geo.lib.umn.edu/plat_books/stateofmn1916/reference/map00953.jpg, accessed October 2024. 52 Westby, P.O., 1913. Atlas of Hennepin County Minnesota. Hennepin Atlas and Publishing Company. Minneapolis, Minnesota. https://geo.lib.umn.edu/plat_books/hennepin1913/composites/champlin_2.jpg, accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 39 Environmental Assessment Worksheet No structures are noted within the Project area on the 1909 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map, which shows the northern half of the Project area covered by wetland.52F53 One structure is noted in the SE 1/4 SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 1 on USGS topographic maps from 1958 and 1981. 53F54,54F55 A farmstead appears in the southeast corner of the Project area in aerial imagery between 1937 and 1971; the remainder of the Project area appears to be utilized for agricultural purposes.55F56 In current aerial imagery the location of the farmstead is forested, and any potential remaining structures are not visible. Conclusions Archaeology • Stantec recommends a finding of No Historic Properties Affected for the Project. No further archaeological work is recommended should the Project proceed as planned. • Should the Project require federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, a Section 106 review would be required along with consultation with the MnSHPO. Architectural • No previously identified above-ground historic resources within 1-mile of the Project area are listed on or eligible for the NRHP based on the desktop review. During the Phase I Archaeological Survey, previously uninventoried structures were identified within the Project area. Stantec recommends that the farmstead, consisting of the ruins of a house and agricultural outbuildings, lacks sufficient integrity and significance to be listed in the NRHP. Stantec recommends no historic properties would be affected. • Based on the preliminary desktop review, a historic architectural property survey was not recommended at this time. Should the Project require federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, a Section 106 review would be required along with consultation with the MnSHPO. 16. Visual Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the Project site. Describe any Project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the Project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. The current land use in the Project area and adjacent properties consist primarily of agricultural and undeveloped land with a few single family-detached homes, an industrial facility and a campground. The Project area itself currently consists of undeveloped forested land and wetlands in the north and south, an agricultural field in the center, and an abandoned farmstead in the wooded area in the southeast. No designated scenic views or vistas are present in the vicinity of the Project area. The landscape immediately surrounding the site consists of farmland to the north, east, and west; wetlands to the north and south; undeveloped forested land to the southwest; an industrial facility to the south; a few single-family homes to the east, and a campground to the southeast. The primary visual impact would be the transition of views from undeveloped forest and agriculture to an industrial facility and stormwater ponds. The Project is not expected to include industries that would emit vapor plumes. The Project area is zoned by the City of Corcoran as Light Industrial. The Project would be required to adhere to the City of Corcoran’s ordinance requirements including building height and form, landscaping, screening, lighting, etc. The Project area is also subject to the Corcoran Northeast District Guidelines, which encourages site layout and landscaping be designed to work with the existing topography, wooded areas, wetlands and natural viewshed and corridors. Wetland impacts 53 United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1909. Rockford, Minnesota 62.5k (Topographic). Electronic document, https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ht- bin/tv_browse.pl?id=f5b4890178eb72c9b12cdcf44592e3af, accessed October 2024. 54 USGS, 1958. Rockford, Minnesota 62.5k (Topographic). Electronic document https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ht- bin/tv_browse.pl?id=268f3a22beeef905275f4d3590b2670c, accessed October 2024. 55 USGS, 1981. Rogers, Minnesota 24k (Topographic). Electronic document, https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ht- bin/tv_browse.pl?id=309ed8c0fa32da0db557b903f1695547, accessed October 2024. 56 University of Minnesota, 2015. Minnesota Historic Aerial Photographs Online. University of Minnesota Libraries. Electronic document, https://apps.lib.umn.edu/mhapo/, accessed October 2024. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 40 Environmental Assessment Worksheet and tree removal would be minimized to the extent possible, particularly to the wetlands and wooded areas in the north and south. Additional vegetative screening may be added, where appropriate. 17. Air a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the Project’s effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. Generally, industrial facilities may utilize natural gas and electric-powered equipment, which would emit low levels of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and criteria pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and particulate matter (PM). An inventory of potential electric and natural gas equipment to be installed as part of future development within the Project area is not known at this time. Generally, air emissions associated with light industrial uses are relatively insignificant and the facilities would not require an air permit. Future industrial developers within the Project area would be responsible for determining air permit applicability or exemption determinations based on the equipment to be installed with their Project prior to initiating construction. b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the Project’s traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the Project’s vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. Motorized vehicles affect air quality by emitting air borne pollutants. The changes in traffic volumes, travel patterns, and roadway locations for the Project could affect air quality by changing the number of vehicles and the congestion levels in the Project area. Criteria pollutants identified by the U.S. EPA are ozone, PM, CO, NO2, lead, and SO2. The Project area is not located in an area of nonattainment or maintenance area for any of the criteria pollutants. The Project would not include transportation improvement Projects that would be considered regionally significant per 40 CFR Part 93. Therefore, no further air quality analysis is warranted. c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during Project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 17a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the Project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. The Project is not anticipated to produce dust or odors during operation but may generate temporary dust and odors during construction. Nearby sensitive receptors would include residential neighborhoods to the north and west of the Project area. Potential odors would likely be associated with exhaust from diesel engines and fuel storage, which would be temporary. Dust generated during construction would be minimized through standard dust control measures such as applying water to exposed soils and limiting the duration of exposed soils to the extent possible. Construction contractors would be required to comply with the City’s Construction Standards which include implementing adequate dust control measures to meet all air quality regulations and minimize the potential to create a nuisance to adjacent property owners. Dust levels, after construction is complete, would be minimal as all surfaces would be paved or revegetated. With these mitigation measures in place, the quality of life for nearby residences is not anticipated to be affected. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 41 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint a. GHG Quantification: For all proposed Projects, provide quantification and discussion of Project GHG emissions. Include additional rows in the tables as necessary to provide Project-specific emission sources. Describe the methods used to quantify emissions. If calculation methods are not readily available to quantify GHG emissions for a source, describe the process used to come to that conclusion and any GHG emission sources not included in the total calculation. The GHG emissions for the Project were calculated using the Simplified Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculator (SGEC) tool and are based on the methodologies for developing a carbon footprint described in Minnesota Environmental Quality Board’s (EQB’s) EAW Guidance (June 2024). Table 19 shows the emission categories for the proposed development scenarios’ carbon footprint calculations, as provided in the EQB Guidance. Table 19. Emission Categories for Carbon Footprint Category Scope Project Phase Type of Emissions Direct Emissions Scope 1 Construction Combustion (Mobile Sources) Scope 1 Operations Combustion (Mobile Sources) Scope 1 Operations Combustion (Stationary Sources) Indirect Emissions Scope 2 Operations Off-site Electricity Scope 3 Operations Off-site Waste Management A description of the carbon footprint associated with the proposed Project is provided below. Construction Emissions GHG emissions from construction of the Project is associated with fuel combustion in the mobile construction equipment and on-road vehicles. For on-road vehicles (commuting construction workers, dump trucks and semi-trucks), emissions are calculated by estimating the number of vehicles, miles traveled (estimated to be 20 miles per day for workers, 60 miles per day for heavy duty trucks), gallons of fuel used (using default mileage rates), and emission factors from the U.S. EPA’s Emission Factors Hub. For off-road vehicles, the quantity and horsepower of cranes, backhoes, loaders, bulldozers, excavators, and skid steers was estimated based on other similar development projects. The default fuel consumption rate of 0.05 gallons per horsepower-hour is used to determine the fuel usage for all equipment. Like the on- road vehicles, emission factors from the Emission Factors Hub are used to calculate GHG emissions. Per EQB’s Revised EAW Guidance, total construction emissions for each scenario are divided by the lifetime of the project, estimated to be 50 years. Operational Emissions – Mobile Sources Average daily trips associated with each scenario are provided in Table 20. The total number of daily trips, 1,917, from the traffic study as noted in Item 20 of this EAW, was split as 20 percent of the daily trips for office employees and 80 percent of the daily trips for warehousing employees. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 42 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 20. Average Trips per Day Project Vehicle Types1 Trips /Day Office/Warehouse Workers 383 Warehouse Shipping Vehicles 1534 1 Estimated based on 1,000 employees for the Project area. For the Project, it is conservatively estimated that daily trips take place for 365 days a year. The daily commute for office and light industrial workers is estimated to be 30 miles round trip. The same distance is assumed for heavy duty shipping trucks, 30 miles per trip. Gas mileage for light duty vehicles (all types) is estimated based on the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Average Fuel Efficiency for Light Duty Vehicles. Delivery trucks and shipping vehicles are assumed to be heavy-duty diesel trucks. Gas mileage for the diesel trucks is based on U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration data from 2022. GHG emissions associated with these trips are calculated using the Emission Factors Hub. Operational Emissions – Stationary Combustion The projected natural gas usage for the buildings associated with each scenario is estimated using the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS, 2018). The CBECS provides natural gas intensities in standard cubic feet per square foot per year for several different building activity categories. Natural gas combustion GHG emissions are calculated using emission factors from the Emission Factors Hub. Operational Emissions – Offsite Electricity Production Like natural gas usage, electricity needs for the proposed buildings are estimated using the CBECS, which provides electricity usage intensity in kilowatt-hours per square foot of building space per year. GHG emissions occur offsite (Scope 2) when the electricity is generated. The SGEC tool calculates GHG emissions from electricity generation on a regional basis (defined by EPA using data from the EIA and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)), using average emission factors based on the mix of fuels used to generate the electricity in each region. For the proposed development scenarios, the Midwest Reliability Organization West (MROW) region is used. The electricity generation in MROW is comprised of approximately 50 percent fossil fuels (coal and natural gas), 9 percent nuclear and approximately 40 percent renewables (hydro, wind, and solar). Operational Emissions - Waste Management GHG emissions from waste management for both scenarios are associated with the waste generation estimates and how that waste is handled. For the Project, a waste generation rate of 6.0 lbs waste per employee per day for corporate office and 13.82 lbs waste per employee per day for warehousing employees was used, based on the CalRecycle’s Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. It is further estimated that the waste generated by the warehouse would be composed of 100 percent municipal solid waste. Applying these rates to the number of employees (a 20%/80% split or 200 for office and 800 for warehousing), yields a total waste generation rate of 1,282 tons per year. Summary A summary of GHG emissions is provided in Table 21. Emissions are presented in tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalent, which takes into account each GHG’s global warming potential (GWP). Corcoran Industrial Northeast 43 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Detailed emission calculations are provided in Appendix F Greenhouse Gas Analysis Calculations. Table 21. GHG Emissions Summary (CO2e in short tons per year) Scope Source Project Emissions Direct Emissions Scope 1 Construction – Mobile Sources1 713 Scope 1 Operations – Mobile Sources 29,520 Scope 1 Operations – Stationary Combustion 888 Indirect Emissions Scope 2 Operations – Purchased Electricity 1,777 Scope 3 Off-Site Waste Management 1,282 Total 34,178 1Note that construction emissions are annualized over the life of the project, estimated to be 50 years. b. GHG Assessment i. Describe any mitigation considered to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions. The following possible activities may be considered to help mitigate the proposed development scenarios’ GHG emissions: • Keeping as many existing trees as possible. o Proposed development within the Project area would plant 500 new trees and 1,500 new shrubs. • Energy-efficient lighting in buildings and parking lots. • Use of low carbon and energy-efficient building materials. • Installation of energy-efficient windows and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units. • Installation of low-flow fixtures and water efficient operations. • Use of renewable energy sources. ii. Describe and quantify reductions from selected mitigation, if proposed to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions. Explain why the selected mitigation was preferred. Reducing energy usage from energy-efficient lighting and building materials would reduce the GHG emissions from the proposed Project. iii. Quantify the proposed Projects predicted net lifetime GHG emissions (total tons/#of years) and how those predicted emissions may affect achievement of the Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act goals and/or other more stringent state or local GHG reduction goals. The lifetime for the proposed development scenarios is estimated at 50 years. Thus, the conservative estimates of lifetime emissions associated with the proposed development scenarios are approximately 1,708,914 tons for the Project. The proposed development scenarios’ GHG emissions would have minimal effect on the State of Minnesota’s or the local area’s GHG reduction goals. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 44 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 19. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during Project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the Project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. 1) Existing noise levels/sources in the area Existing sources of noise include traffic noise from surrounding roadways. Interstate 94 is northeast of the Project area, while public roadways CSAH 101 (Brockton Lane) and Stieg Road are to the east and south/southwest of the Project area, respectively. Some existing noise is generated from agricultural equipment near the Project area and residential noise associated with neighborhoods to the southwest and southeast of the Project area. 2) Nearby sensitive receptors Nearby sensitive receptors include residential neighborhoods to the southwest and southeast of the Project area. A campground is present east of the Project area along the west side of CSAH 101. 3) Conformance to State noise standards The State of Minnesota’s noise rules (Minn. Rules Ch. 7030) establish noise limits by noise area classifications (NACs) based on land use at the location of the person that hears noise. Table 22 identified state noise standards for each NAC. The MPCA enforces noise standards at industrial facilities for which it has issued an air permit. Given that the Project proposes light industrial development consisting of office and warehouse uses, it is not anticipated that the Project would generate operational noise that would exceed state noise standards. Table 22. Noise Area Classifications Noise Area Classification Common land use associated with the Noise Area Classification Daytime (dBA) Nighttime (dBA) L10 L50 L10 L50 1 Residential housing, religious activities, camping and picnicking areas, health services, hotels, educational services 65 60 55 50 2 Retail, business and government services, recreational activities, transit passenger terminals 70 65 70 65 3 Manufacturing, fairgrounds and amusement parks, agricultural and forestry activities 80 75 80 75 4) Quality of life During construction, noise levels would temporarily increase and vary in intensity based on the types of construction equipment being used. Table 23 summarizes expected noise levels for typical construction equipment. To minimize the effects of this noise, construction would be limited to daytime hours consistent with the City’s construction and noise ordinances. In addition, construction equipment would be fitted with mufflers that would be maintained throughout the construction process. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 45 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 23. Typical Roadway Construction Equipment Noise Levels at 50 Feet Equipment Type Manufacturers Sampled Total Number of Models in Sample Peak Noise Level Range Average Backhoe 5 6 74-92 83 Front Loader 5 30 75-96 85 Dozer 8 41 65-95 85 Grader 3 15 72-92 84 Scraper 2 17 76-98 87 Pile Driver N/A N/A 95-105 101 Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Highway Administration Following construction, noise in the area would be typical of light industrial usage. Additional traffic added to surrounding roadways is not expected to generate noise to a degree with would exceed noise standards or diminish quality of life for people living or working nearby. 20. Transportation a. Describe traffic-related aspects of Project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. 1) Existing parking spaces - 0. Proposed parking spaces - approximately 510 2) Total average daily traffic generated – 1,917 trips per day 3) Maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence – 239 trips during a.m. peak hour (7:30- 8:30 a.m.). 4) Source of trip generation rates - Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers 5) Availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes - There are no transit routes or pedestrian facilities in the study area. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 46 Environmental Assessment Worksheet b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the Project’s impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance. Stantec completed a Traffic Impact Study (summary provided in Appendix D and complete study provided in Appendix G). This appendix includes relevant figures including existing traffic volumes, future peak traffic volumes, proposed development layout, and access locations. The Traffic Impact Study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed Project at the following intersections: • CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway • CSAH 101/north access/future street (future only) • CSAH 101/south access • CSAH 101/Stieg Road • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. In accordance with MnDOT traffic study guidelines, this analysis used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of acceptable traffic operations. Table 24 and Table 25 summarize the results of the intersection operations analysis for the year 2028 and 2040 conditions, respectively. Table 24. Year 2028 No Build and Build Intersection Operations Analysis Intersection Traffic Control 2028 No Build LOS 2028 Build LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D B/C B/D CSAH 101/north access EB stop NA NA A/C A/D CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/B A/C A/B A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/C A/C A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under 2028 No Build and 2028 Build conditions. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 47 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 25. Year 2040 No Build and Build Intersection Operations Analysis Intersection Traffic Control 2040 No Build LOS 2040 Build LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/D C/D C/D C/D CSAH 101/north access EB/WB stop A/C A/E A/E E/F CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/C A/C A/C A/D CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/D A/C A/E CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal E/F D/E E/F D/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. Under 2040 No Build conditions, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Under 2040 Build conditions, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F. During the a.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS A with all movements at LOS E or better. All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate Project related transportation effects. Based on the traffic forecasts and operations analysis for each intersection, the following mitigation measures are recommended: • CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway o No improvements needed under any scenario. • CSAH 101/north access/future street o 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. o 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. • CSAH 101/south access o No improvements needed under any scenario. • CSAH 101/Stieg Road o No improvements needed under any scenario. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 48 Environmental Assessment Worksheet • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 o 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. o 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. 21. Cumulative Potential Effects (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the Project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. The Project is anticipated to be constructed in two phases starting with Phase 1 in the summer of 2025. Phase 1 would include construction of the eastern building and adjacent roadways and is expected to be complete by the summer of 2026. Phase 2 would include construction of the western building and adjacent roadways and is expected to be complete by the summer of 2027. The construction timeline is subject to change and would ultimately be driven by market demand. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future Projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed Project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. The Parkway Neighborhood residential/commercial development is proposed approximately 0.7- miles northeast from the Project area, just south of I-94 and east of CSAH 101 (Brockton Lane), in the City of Dayton. The Parkway Neighborhood residential/commercial development is proposed on approximately 67.29 acres south of I-94 in the City of Dayton, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The project is planned to include 650 medium/high-density residential units, a commercial parcel with convenience store, gas station/car wash, and service retail building(s). The project is also planned to include a connection to the Rush Creek Regional Trail, recreational area, internal roads, parks, and stormwater features. The project is anticipated to begin in fall of 2024 and be completed in phases over the next five years, dependent upon market demand. The Bellwether and Amberly residential developments are located approximately 0.7-miles southwest of the proposed Project, south of Stieg Road and west of CSAH 101. The Bellwether development, consisting of approximately 225.9 acres, includes construction of 398 homes. The Amberly development, approximately 28 acres, includes construction of 76 homes and is being constructed in conjunction with the Bellwether development. It is anticipated these developments would be completed in approximately 2027. Nelson International is a recently completed light industrial development located just south of the Project area, north of Stieg Road and west of CSAH 101. Nelson International is a full-service international truck dealership. The 35,000 square foot building allows space for truck sales and service including showroom, administrative and sales offices, maintenance, repair, and parts storage. Red Barn Pet Retreat is a dog daycare and boarding business which is expanding to a new location approximately 0.5-miles south of the proposed Project near the intersection of Stieg Road and CSAH 101. Red Barn currently operates at 19520 Stieg Road (approximately 0.7-mile from proposed Project). This new facility would allow the business to expand with 115 overnight suites, 15 playrooms, 5 exterior yards, cat boarding, retail space in the front office, and an outdoor walking path. The new location is anticipated to be open in Summer 2024 Hope Community Church is requesting to develop a 44.5 acre property in the northwest corner of CR 30 and CR 116, approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the proposed Project. The Project is a mixed-use development with multi-family housing, townhomes, senior apartments and villas, and commercial and medical office space. The Project may include approximately 738 total housing units. It is anticipated that Corcoran Industrial Northeast 49 Environmental Assessment Worksheet the Project would be constructed in four phases. The estimated project schedule is initiation in Fall 2023, with Phase I to be competed in Spring 2025. Three phases would follow through 2028, subject to market demands. The City of Corcoran would receive a dedication of land from the Project Proposer (Hempel Real Estate) for a future, City well. The schedule for development of the well remains to be determined. c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. Potential impacts that were considered as part of the cumulative potential effects evaluation include water resources, wetlands, public-infrastructure, loss of agricultural land, and transportation. Water Resources The Project would convert undeveloped agricultural land into a proposed business park, which would increase impervious surfaces compared to existing conditions. As discussed in Item 12 of this EAW, the proposed additional impervious surface area is expected to result in higher runoff rates and volumes, compared to the existing conditions, and there may also be a change in pollutants in the runoff. Other proposed developments in the area resulting in the conversion of agricultural and rural residential land to commercial, industrial and residential developments would results in similar changes. These future developments would be required to implement stormwater BMPs to mitigate stormwater runoff impacts in accordance with all City, ECWMC, and MPCA approval and permitting requirements. Therefore, adverse cumulative impacts to water quality and quantity are not anticipated. Public Infrastructure As discussed in Item 12, water supply for the Project would be provided by a new City of Corcoran treatment plant and tower that is expected to be operational mid-year 2025. The City of Maple Grove, under an existing contract with the City of Corcoran, is the current water supplier. Water supply for the Project would be consistent with the water supply planned for the Northeast Corcoran area. As discussed in Item 12, sewer and watermain improvements would be required to provide services to the Project. In order to avoid overloading the City’s existing and planned wastewater infrastructure, the Proposer would be required to limit the total wastewater volume from the fully developed parcel to not more than 1,000 gallons per day per acre (gpd/acre), consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City of Corcoran regulates future development through its land use policies and zoning requirements. Therefore, adverse cumulative impacts related to public infrastructure are not anticipated. As described in 21.b., the City of Corcoran would receive a dedication of land from the Project Proposer (Hempel Real Estate) for a future, City well. The schedule for development of the well remains to be determined; however, it would serve to meet the water needs of development within the City. Wetlands As described in Item 12, it is anticipated that the Project would impact approximately 0.3 acres of wetlands. Potential wetland impacts would be confirmed during final design and permitting of the Project. Planned development in the vicinity of the Project may also impact wetlands in the surrounding area. Wetlands are protected by state and federal laws, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and WCA, which require avoidance of wetland impacts when possible, and when avoidance is not possible, impacts must be minimized and mitigated. Adverse cumulative impacts to wetlands are not anticipated given the federal and state regulations that mandate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation requirements for wetland impacts. Corcoran Industrial Northeast 50 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Agricultural Land The Project would convert existing agricultural land to a business park development. Planned development in surrounding areas may also convert agricultural land to other land uses. The City of Corcoran guides development through the City’s land use plan and zoning codes. The Project is consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which identifies the Project area and adjacent properties for future light industrial development. The City of Corcoran through their land use policies and zoning requirements, regulates future development and can protect agricultural land from future development as appropriate. Therefore, adverse cumulative impacts to agricultural land are not anticipated. Transportation A Traffic Impact Study for the Project was completed that incorporated future traffic growth and recommended mitigation measures to address traffic impacts (Appendix G). Future developments in the surrounding area that are anticipated to increase traffic congestion, would be required to complete a traffic impact study and identify mitigation measures to address these impacts. Therefore, adverse cumulative impacts related to traffic congestion are not anticipated. 22. Other Potential Environmental Effects If the Project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. No other potential environmental effects are anticipated that are not addressed by Items 1 through 21. RGU CERTIFICATION (The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.) I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete Project; there are no other Projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the Project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Date Title Appendix A Figures Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 26 25 30 29 35 36 31 32 2 1 6 5 11 12 7 8 T1 2 0 R 2 3 W T1 2 0 R 2 2 W T120 R23W T119 R23W T120 R22W T119 R22W T1 1 9 R 2 3 W T1 1 9 R 2 2 W Maple GroveCorcoran Rogers Dayton Hennepin Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area County Boundaries County Subdivision Township/Range & Section Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: USGS 3. Background: USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Project Location USGS Topo Map 1 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County Jackie L n St ieg R d Rush C r e e k Cre e k s i d e T r l Laurel Cree k Pkw y B r o c k t o n L n N D ayton P k w y113th L n Stieg Rd Elm Ln Ro b e r t L n B r oc kt on L n N 1 0 1 st A v e N 10 5th Ave 1 03 r d A v e 10 4th P l 1 0 2ndPl Ru sh C r e e k 94 D a yt o n P k w y 101s t A v eN Troy LnN Tr o y Ln N S h a d y view Ln N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:14,400 0 600 1,200 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Project Location Aerial Map 2 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County B r o c k t o n L n N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 1 8 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Wetlands Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Lampert Architects, Stantec 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:4,800 0 200 400 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-11-18T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Site Plan 3 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Br o c k t o n L a N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area TCMA Land Cover 2016 Grass/Shrub Buildings Roads/Paved Surfaces Lakes/Ponds Deciduous Tree Canopy Coniferous Tree Canopy Agriculture Emergent Wetlands Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: UMN 3. Background: TCMA 1-Meter Land Cover (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:6,000 0 250 500 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Land Cover 4 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Stie g R d Br o c k t o n L a N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Parcels Generalized Land Use 2020 Agricultural Extractive Farmstead Park, Recreational, or Preserve Retail and Other Commercial Single Family Detached Undeveloped Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Met Council 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Existing Land Use 5 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Stie g R d Br o c k t o n L a N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Parcels Generalized Planned Land Use Commercial Existing Residential Industrial Light Industrial Low - Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Mixed Residential Mixed Use Mixed Use Development Protected Resources Public/Semi-Public Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Met Council 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Proposed Land Use 6 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County §¨¦94 4567159 456781 4567116 4567101 100th Ave La w n d a l e L a Hillside Dr Darrel La Dassel La 99t h Pl 109th Ave N Troy LaN Country Cir E Br o c k t o n La N Ro b e r t L a Hun ter s Rdg CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd CS A H 8 1 H o l l y L a 101st Ave Tr o y L a Terr i t o r i a l R d StiegRd Fl e t c h e r L a Br o c k t o n L a N Maple GroveCorcoran Rogers Dayton Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 1 8 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Municipal Boundary Metro Region Parks Railroads Corcoran Planned Trails Snowmobile Trails Metro Region Trails/Bikeways Planned Existing Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MnDNR, Met Council, MnGeo, MnDOT, City of Corcoran 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:18,000 0 750 1,500 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-11-18T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Parks, Trails and Recreational Areas 7 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Stie g R d Brockt o n La N Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Hennepin Co. Surficial Geology QI, Organic clayey silt to sand Qht - New Ulm Fm, Heiberg till Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: MGS 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Surficial Geology 8 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 L61C2 L61C2 L45A L45A L45A L45AL44A L44A L44A L44A L45A L15A L132A L60B L14A L60B L18A L22C2 L22C2 L22C2 L37B L37B L24A L23A L23A L24A L24A Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 - 2 8 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Soil Map Unit (With Map Unit Symbol) Farmland Classification All areas are prime farmland Farmland of statewide importance Not prime farmland Prime farmland if drained Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: NRCS 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:4,800 0 200 400 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-10-28T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Soil Survey 9 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County !A !A !A !A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A 4567101 00208988 00559029 00738171 00331529 00331530 00331528 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area 1/4 Mile Radius Field Verified Wells !A Domestic !A Environmental Borehole !A Abandoned Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: MDH, MWI 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW MWI Well Map 10 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County Rush Creek, South Fork (Cl-; E.coli; FishesBio; InvertBio) Rush Creek (DO; E.coli; FishesBio; InvertBio) 27031700 27031400 27030700 27024200 27029700 27030900 27011300 27031900 27031100 27016300 27011400 27031800 §¨¦94 4567116 4567117 456781 4567159 4567116 456730 4567101 Rush C r e ek (M-062-004) R ush Cr eek,South F or k (M-062-0 0 4 -0 02) Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area 1 Mile Radius 2024 MPCA Impaired Streams (Draft) Public Waters Watercourse Public Waters Basin NHD Flowline NHD Waterbody NWI Circular 39 Class 1 - Seasonally Flooded Basin or Flat 3 - Shallow Marsh 4 - Deep Marsh 5 - Shallow Open Water 6 - Shrub Swamp Municipal and Industrial Activities Riverine Systems Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: MPCA, MnDNR, NHD, PWI, NWI 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Water Resources 11 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Wetland 1 13.73 ac Wetland 3 5.73 ac Wetland 2 1.36 ac Wetland 5 0.03 ac Wetland 4 0.21 ac Wetland 1 0.03 ac Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 4 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area Field Delineated Wetlands (21.1 ac) Proposed Wetland Impacts (0.3 ac) Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec, Sambatek, Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:4,800 0 200 400 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-11-04T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Proposed Wetland Impacts 12 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 4567101 Stie g R d Br o c k t o n L a N A A RushCreek(M-062-004) Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 1 8 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Public Waters Watercourse Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: FEMA, MnDNR 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-11-18T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW Flood Hazard Zones Map 13 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County !. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! # 4567101 Stie g R d Br o c k t o n L a N Tree Farm Landscape Tree Farm Landscape Nelson International Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ U: \ 1 9 3 8 \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ A r c P r o \ E A W \ E A W . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 0 9 - 1 1 B y : l h e r s h l e y Legend Project Area 1/4 Mile Radius MPCA Sites Program Name !Investigation and Cleanup !Stormwater #Tanks Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: MPCA 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:9,600 0 400 800 Feet Prepared by LAH on 2024-09-11T119N, R23W, S01 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190City of Corcoran Corcoran NE Industrial EAW MPCA WIMN Potentially Contaminated Sites 14 Appendix B MDH Well Log Reports and Stratigraphic Records Minnesota Unique Well No. County Hennepin MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING RECORD Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031208988 Entry Date Rogers Quad ID Well Name NORTH STAR Township 119 Range Dir W Section 6 Subsection CBBCDB Jordan-Tunnel City7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Quad Well Depth Depth Completed 459016 Update 139 499910 22 A Depth to Bedrock Static Water LevelElevation950 ft.ft Use domestic 02/10/2016 UTM Northing (Y) UTM Easting (X) 08/24/1991 359 ft. Date Well Completed 359 ft. Geological Interpretation 01/01/1990 Locate MethodField Located By Elev. Method Minnesota Geological Survey Status 12/22/1970 121A Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) - NAD83 - Zone 15 - Received Date Aquifer Lic/Reg. No. 27015 Open Hole Unique No. Verified Information from owner-site John Mossler Input Source Input Date Agency (Interpretation)Interpretaion Method 222 359 -ftft60 Minnesota Geological Survey Geologic study 1:24k to 1:100k Geological Material From ToColor Hardness Thickness From To Stratigraphy Primary Lithology Secondary Minor Lithology Depth (ft.)Elevation (ft.) FINE SAND 0 32YELLOW 32 950 918 sand-yellow sand CLAY 32 60BLUE 28 918 890 clay-gray clay MUDDY SAND & GRAVEL 60 112BROWN 52 890 838 sand+silt-brown sand gravel mud MUDDY SAND & GRAVEL 112 130YELLOW 18 838 820 sand+silt-yellow sand gravel mud SHALE 130 139YELLOW 9 820 811 clay-yellow clay SANDSTONE 139 175RED 36 811 775 Jordan Sandstone sandstone SANDSTONE 175 191WHITE 16 775 759 Jordan Sandstone sandstone SANDSTONE 191 220YELLOW 29 759 730 Jordan Sandstone sandstone SANDSTONE 220 229HARDWHITE 9 730 721 Jordan Sandstone sandstone SANDSTONE 229 230HARDPINK 1 721 720 Jordan Sandstone sandstone SANDSTONE & SHALE 230 269VARIED 39 720 681 St.Lawrence shale dolomite SHALE 269 275GREEN 6 681 675 St.Lawrence shale dolomite SANDSTONE 275 359GRAY 84 675 591 Tunnel City Group sandstone shale dolomite Minnesota Well Index - Stratigraphy Report Printed on 10/09/2024208988 Minnesota Unique Well No. County Hennepin MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING RECORD Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031331528 Entry Date Rogers Quad ID Well Name B-7 Township 119 Range Dir W Section 1 Subsection AAADDB LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR) Quad Well Depth Depth Completed 458948 Update 499989 23 S Depth to Bedrock Static Water LevelElevation913 ft.ft Use abandoned 02/13/2015 UTM Northing (Y) UTM Easting (X) 02/13/2015 36 ft. Date Well Completed 36 ft. Geological Interpretation 02/13/2015 Locate MethodField Located By Elev. Method Minnesota Geological Survey Status 10/06/2014 121A Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) - NAD83 - Zone 15 - Received Date Aquifer Lic/Reg. No. 1795 Open Hole Unique No. Verified Site Plan Emily Bauer Input Source Input Date Agency (Interpretation)Interpretaion Method -ftft15 Minnesota Geological Survey Geologic study 1:24k to 1:100k Geological Material From ToColor Hardness Thickness From To Stratigraphy Primary Lithology Secondary Minor Lithology Depth (ft.)Elevation (ft.) LEAN CLAY W/SAND 0 2BLACK 2 913 911 clay+sand-black clay sand LEAN CLAY 2 4GRY/BRN 2 911 909 clay clay SANDY CLAY 4 7GRAY 3 909 906 clay+sand-gray clay sand SANDY CLAY 7 26GRAY 19 906 887 clay+sand-gray clay sand SILTY SAND 26 31GRAY 5 887 882 sand+silt-gray sand silt CLAYEY SAND 31 36GRAY 5 882 877 clay+sand-gray sand clay Minnesota Well Index - Stratigraphy Report Printed on 10/09/2024331528 Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031208988 County Hennepin Entry Date 08/24/1991 Quad Rogers Update Date 02/10/2016 Quad ID 121A Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed NORTH STAR 119 22 W 6 CBBCDB 359 ft.359 ft.12/22/1970 Elevation 950 ft.Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet)Drill Method Drill Fluid Address Use domestic Status Active Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Casing Type Single casing No Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint Well MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness FINE SAND 0 32 YELLOW CLAY 32 60 BLUE MUDDY SAND &60 112 BROWN MUDDY SAND &112 130 YELLOW SHALE 130 139 YELLOW SANDSTONE 139 175 RED SANDSTONE 175 191 WHITE SANDSTONE 191 220 YELLOW SANDSTONE 220 229 HARDWHITE SANDSTONE 229 230 HARDPINK SANDSTONE & SHALE 230 269 VARIED SHALE 269 275 GREEN SANDSTONE 275 359 GRAY Stratigraphy Information Casing Diameter Weight 8 222in. To ft. lbs./ft. Hole Diameter 8 359in. To ft. Screen?MakeType 222Open Hole From ft. To ft.359 Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) M.G.S. NO. 628. Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 208988 HE-01205-15 Printed on 10/09/2024 TUBBSPitless adapter manufacturer Model At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above grade JACUZZI Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.60 Measureland surface 12/22/1970 ft. hrs. Pumping at 125 g.p.m. feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion?Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. 12/00/1970 5 8884 Submersible Yes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Renner E.H. & Sons 27015 Remarks Jordan Sandstone Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock Tunnel City Group Minnesota Geological Survey Jordan-Tunnel 139 Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Table) System X Y459016 4999100 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 01/01/1990Information from Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031331528 County Hennepin Entry Date 02/13/2015 Quad Rogers Update Date 02/13/2015 Quad ID 121A Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed B-7 119 23 W 1 AAADDB 36 ft.36 ft.10/06/2014 Elevation 913 ft.Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR)Drill Method Drill Fluid Address Use abandoned Status Sealed Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Casing Type No Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness LEAN CLAY W/SAND 0 2 BLACK LEAN CLAY 2 4 GRY/BRN SANDY CLAY 4 7 GRAY SANDY CLAY 7 26 GRAY SILTY SAND 26 31 GRAY CLAYEY SAND 31 36 GRAY Stratigraphy Information Screen?MakeType Open Hole From ft. To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) SEALED 10-6-14 BY 1795. ORIGINAL USE-ENVIRONMENTAL BOREHOLE. Material FromAmount To bentonite ft. 36 ft.2.2 Sacks Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 331528 HE-01205-15 Printed on 10/09/2024 Pitless adapter manufacturer Model At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above grade X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.15 Measureland surface 10/06/2014 feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion?Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. Yes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller American Engineering 1795 HANSON, G. Remarks Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock clay+sand-gray Minnesota Geological Survey Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters or System X Y458948 4999895 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 02/13/2015Site Plan Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031331529 County Hennepin Entry Date 02/13/2015 Quad Rogers Update Date 10/01/2015 Quad ID 121A Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed B-5 119 22 W 6 BBBBBB 36 ft.36 ft.10/06/2014 Elevation 907 ft.Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR)Drill Method Drill Fluid Address Use environ. bore hole Status Sealed Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Casing Type No Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness PEAT 0 2 SOFTBLACK CLAYEY SAND 2 4 SOFTBROWN CLAY W/SAND 4 6 GRAY SANDY CLAY 6 17 GRAY LEAN CLAY W/SAND 17 19 GRAY SANDY CLAY 19 36 GRAY Stratigraphy Information Screen?MakeType Open Hole From ft. To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) SEALED 10-6-14 BY 1795. ORIGINAL USE-ENVIRONMENTAL BOREHOLE. Material FromAmount To bentonite ft. 36 ft.2.2 Sacks Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 331529 HE-01205-15 Printed on 11/05/2024 Pitless adapter manufacturer Model At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above grade X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.33.7 Measureland surface 11/06/2014 feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion?Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. Yes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller American Engineering 1795 HANSON, G. Remarks Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock clay+sand-gray Minnesota Geological Survey Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters or System X Y459006 5000033 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 02/13/2015Site Plan Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031331530 County Hennepin Entry Date 02/13/2015 Quad Rogers Update Date 10/01/2015 Quad ID 121A Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed B-4 119 22 W 6 BBAAAA 31 ft.31 ft.10/03/2014 Elevation 910 ft.Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR)Drill Method Drill Fluid Address Use environ. bore hole Status Sealed Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Casing Type No Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness FILL, CLAYEY SAND 0 2 SOFTBLACK SILTY SAND 2 7 DK. BRN SAND W/SILT 7 9 GRAY SANDY CLAY 9 12 GRAY SANDY CLAY 12 31 GRAY Stratigraphy Information Screen?MakeType Open Hole From ft. To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) SEALED 10-3-14 BY 1795. ORIGINAL USE-ENVIRONMENTAL BOREHOLE. Material FromAmount To bentonite ft. 31 ft.1.9 Sacks Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 331530 HE-01205-15 Printed on 11/05/2024 Pitless adapter manufacturer Model At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above grade X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.8.4 Measureland surface 10/03/2014 feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion?Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. Yes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller American Engineering 1795 HANSON, G. Remarks Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock clay+sand-gray Minnesota Geological Survey Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters or System X Y459352 5000026 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 02/13/2015Site Plan Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031559029 County Hennepin Entry Date 12/17/1996 Quad Rogers Update Date 02/18/2015 Quad ID 121A Received Date 05/10/1995 Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed PETERSON, 120 23 W 36 DCDCCA 85 ft.85 ft.03/29/1995 Elevation 915 ft.Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR)Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel Address Use domestic Status Active Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Solvent WeldedCasing Type Single casing No X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint C/W 10901 BROCKTON LA ROGERS MN Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness SAND & GRAVEL 0 5 SOFTGRY/BLK SAND 5 13 SOFTBLACK CLAY 13 53 MEDIUMGRAY SAND 53 85 SOFTBRN/YEL Stratigraphy Information Casing Diameter Weight 4 80in. To ft. lbs./ft. Hole Diameter 6.5 80in. To ft. stainlessScreen?Make JOHNSONXType Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 2 10in.ft.805 85 ft.ft. Open Hole From ft. To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) Material FromAmount To cuttings ft.30 80 ft. bentonite ft. 30 ft.2 Sacks Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 559029 HE-01205-15 Printed on 11/05/2024 MONITORPitless adapter manufacturer Model 4AO5.5 At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above gradeXX AERMOTER X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.20 Measureland surface 03/29/1995 ft.60 hrs.3 Pumping at 30 g.p.m. 50 feet South Direction Septic tank/drain field Type Well disinfected upon completion?X Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. 03/30/1995 12T50 0.5 230 1260 Submersible XYes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Mc Alpine's Well Co.27186 MCALPINE, S. Remarks Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock sand Minnesota Geological Survey Quat. buried GPS SA Off (averaged) (15 meters) System X Y458416 5000091 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 01/23/2015Address verification Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031738171 County Hennepin Entry Date Quad Rogers Update Date 11/07/2014 Quad ID 121A Received Date 01/29/2007 Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed STIEG, DENNIS 119 23 W 1 DBACBC 82 ft.82 ft.07/26/2006 Elevation 942 ft.Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR)Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite Address Use domestic Status Active Well Hydrofractured?XYes No From To GluedCasing Type Single casing No X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint Well 19320 STIEG RD CORCORAN MN 55340 Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness CLAY 0 30 MEDIUMBROWN CLAY 30 42 MEDIUMGRAY SAND & GRAVEL 42 82 SOFTBROWN CLAY 82 82 SOFTBROWN Stratigraphy Information Casing Diameter Weight 4 72 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft. Hole Diameter 6.5 82in. To ft. plasticScreen?Make BIGFOOTXType Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 4 15in.ft.7210 82 ft.ft. Open Hole From ft. To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) Material FromAmount To cuttings ft.30 72 ft. bentonite ft. 30 ft.2 Sacks Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 738171 HE-01205-15 Printed on 11/05/2024 MONITORPitless adapter manufacturer Model 4X1 SNAPPY At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above gradeX GOULDS X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.47 Measureland surface 07/26/2006 ft.72 hrs.2 Pumping at 40 g.p.m. 45 feet East Direction Sewer Type Well disinfected upon completion?X Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. 10SB07 0.75 230 1560 Submersible XYes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes X No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller JA Mcalpine Well Drilling, Inc. 1352 MCALPINE, J. Remarks Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock clay-brown Minnesota Geological Survey Quat. buried GPS SA Off (averaged) (15 meters) System X Y458378 4999104 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 08/11/2014Address verification Angled Drill Hole Appendix C WCA Notice of Decision BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 1 B Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: City of Corcoran County: Hennepin Applicant Name: Gonyea Companies – Jake Walesch Applicant Representative: Todd Ullom - Sambatek Project Name: Corcoran Industrial LGU Project No. (if any): Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 10/15/2021 Date of LGU Decision: 11/18/2021 Date this Notice was Sent: 11/29/2021 WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ☒ Wetland Boundary/Type ☐ Sequencing ☐ Replacement Plan ☐ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ☐ No-Loss (8420.0415) ☐ Exemption (8420.0420) Part: ☐ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Click here to enter text. Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits: ☐ Bank Credits: Bank Account Number(s): Click here to enter text. Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) (See attached Findings) ☒ Approve ☐ Approve w/Conditions ☐ Deny ☐ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ☐ Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 ☒ Approved1 ☐ Denied List Conditions: Decision-Maker for this Application: ☒ Staff ☐ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other: Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify): 1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project- specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1. ☐ Attachment(s) (specify): ☒ Summary: On behalf of the Applicant, Todd Ullom and JD Donath submitted a wetland delineation report for the Corcoran Industrial project located north of the Brockton Lane and Stieg Road intersection in the City of Corcoran. Four wetlands were originally delineated on site. After the field review with Lucas Mueller (LGU) and JD Donath conducted on October 22, 2021, an additional wetland was observed and added to the delineated wetlands, Wetland 2 was divided by an upland access road, and the boundary of Wetland 1 was extended outward on the east side. In addition, the LGU recommended additional offsite review areas be investigated. At the completion of the review, an additional farmed wetland was determined to be present and extend off of Wetland 1. This farmed wetland was added to the boundary of Wetland 1 and can be seen in BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 2 the revised Wetland Delineation Map. An updated figure showing the recommended changes and comments was received by Sambatek on December 15, 2021. On behalf of the City of Corcoran, the LGU approves the updated Wetland Delineation Type and Boundary application submitted by Sambatek on 12/15/2021. 1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. Attached Project Documents ☒ Site Location Map ☐ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ☐ Yes1 ☒ No 1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ☒ SWCD TEP Member: Stacey Lijewski, Hennepin SWCD ☒ BWSR TEP Member: Ben Carlson ☒ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): Lucas Mueller, Stantec ☒ DNR Representative: Wes Saunders-Pearce ☒ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Elm Creek Watershed District ☒ Applicant: Gonyea Companies – Jake Walesch ☒ Agent/Consultant: Todd Ullom and JD Donath - Sambatek Optional or As Applicable: ☒ Corps of Engineers: usace_requests_mn@usace.army.mil ☐ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ☐ Members of the Public (notice only): ☐ Other: BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 3 Signature: Date: 12/20/2021 This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. Appendix D Feasibility Study Report Corcoran Industrial Park Feasibility Study November 2024 Prepared for: City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY Table of Contents NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 i Table of Contents CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY Table of Contents NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project .......................................................................... 2.3 Table 2: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................. 2.3 Table 3: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................. 2.4 Table 4: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results ....................................................................... 2.6 Table 5: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results ....................................................................... 2.6 Table 6: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results ....................................................................... 2.6 Table 7: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results ....................................................................... 2.7 Table 8: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results ....................................................................... 2.7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Concept Plan LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Water Distribution System Modeling Appendix B Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plans Appendix C Stormwater Guidelines and Floodplain CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY 1.0 Introduction NOVEMBER 2024 1.1 INTRODUCTION The proposed project will involve the development of approximately 80 acres of land into an industrial building park. The project will include the construction of two buildings totaling over 500,000 square feet of industrial building intended for commercial distribution and manufacturing and related infrastructure to support these facilities. The proposed development is in the very NE corner of Corcoran and is located on PID 0111923110001. This Feasibility Study is the basis for identifying infrastructure improvements to support the development. The Feasibility Study is incorporated into an ongoing Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.1 TRANSPORTATION 2.1 BACKGROUND This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed project at the following intersections: · CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway · CSAH 101/north access/future street (future only) · CSAH 101/south access · CSAH 101/Stieg Road · CSAH 101/CSAH 30 2.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project will involve construction of two buildings totaling 542,200 square feet in size. For purpose of this study, the buildings are assumed to contain 108,440 square feet (20%) of office space and 433,760 square feet (80%) of manufacturing/warehouse space. Access will be provided at two locations on CSAH 101. The project is expected to be completed in 2028. 2.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed project site is currently used for agriculture purposes. The site is bounded by CSAH 101 on the east, a truck maintenance facility to the south, and agricultural uses and wetlands on the north and west. Adjacent to the project, across CSAH 101 to the east is land within the City of Maple Grove which is currently used for agricultural purposes but is guided for single family residential homes. Near the site location, CSAH 101 is a two-lane roadway with turn lanes and traffic signal control at major intersections. Dayton Parkway is a four-lane divided roadway with interchange access at I-94. Stieg Road is a two-lane local roadway which connects to CR 116 to the west. CSAH 30 is a two lane east/west roadway that expands to four lanes in Maple Grove to the east. Existing conditions near the proposed project location are described below. CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. CSAH 101/south access This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through lane. The southbound approach provides one through lane and one right turn lane. The west leg currently serves as access for an existing business. CSAH 101/Stieg Road This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through lane. The southbound approach provides one through lane and one right turn lane. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.2 CSAH 101/CSAH 30 This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. Traffic Volume Data Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at the existing intersections in September 2024. Existing traffic volume data is presented later in this report. 2.4 TRAFFIC FORECASTS To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project and other development in the area, forecasts and analyses were completed for the years 2028 and 2040. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: · 2024 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by existing uses near the project site. · 2028 No-Build. Existing volumes were increased by 2.0 percent per year to account for background growth in the surrounding area. The growth rate was based on historic growth in the area. · 2028 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2028 No-Build volumes to determine 2028 Build volumes. · 2040 No-Build. Existing volumes were increased by 2.0 percent per year to account for background growth in the surrounding area. The growth rate was based on historic growth in the area. · 2040 Build. Trips generated by the development were added to the 2040 No-Build volumes to determine 2040 Build volumes. The proposed project includes two new access points on CSAH 101 with the northern access located approximately 1,800 feet north of the south access. For purpose of this study, the access was assumed to be located across from a future new public street in Maple Grove. Traffic volumes were estimated for the new street using information presented in the Northwest – 610 Master Plan dated November 2019 developed by the City of Maple Grove with the roadway planned to be a parkway collector. The new street was assumed to be in place by 2040. Minor street stop sign control with left and right turn lanes on CSAH 101 were assumed for the initial traffic analysis at both the northern and southern access locations. The expected new development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 1. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.3 Table 1: Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Office (ITE 710) 108,440 SF 145 20 165 27 129 156 1,175 Manufacturing/Warehouse (ITE 150) 433,760 SF 57 17 74 22 56 78 742 Totals 202 37 239 49 185 234 1,917 Note: SF=square feet Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: · 65 percent to/from the east on Dayton Parkway · 10 percent to/from the north on CSAH 101 · 15 percent to/from the east on CSAH 30 · 5 percent to/from the west on CSAH 30 · 5 percent to/from the south on CSAH 101 Development trips from Table 1 were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant peak hour volumes are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CSAH 101/Dayton Pkwy EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 3 91 34 110 23 79 8 114 119 353 249 4 2028 No-Build 3 99 37 119 25 86 9 123 129 382 270 4 2028 Build 3 99 37 250 25 86 9 127 153 382 290 4 2040 No-Build 4 125 47 229 32 108 11 174 280 485 354 5 2040 Build 4 125 47 360 32 108 11 178 304 485 374 5 CSAH 101/north access/Maple Grove access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing - - - - - - - 267 - - 387 - 2028 No-Build - - - - - - - 289 - - 419 - 2028 Build 21 - 3 - - - 13 296 - - 457 113 2040 No-Build - - - 45 - 135 367 30 90 531 - 2040 Build 21 0 3 45 0 135 13 374 30 90 569 113 CSAH 101/south access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 3 - 0 - - - 2 264 - - 383 4 2028 No-Build 3 - 0 - - - 2 286 - - 415 4 CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.4 2028 Build 10 - 6 - - - 40 299 - - 418 42 2040 No-Build 4 - 0 - - - 3 392 - - 571 5 2040 Build 11 - 6 - - - 41 405 - - 574 43 CSAH 101/Stieg Road EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 21 - 31 - - - 24 245 - - 377 14 2028 No-Build 23 - 34 - - - 26 265 - - 408 15 2028 Build 23 - 34 - - - 26 316 - - 417 15 2040 No-Build 29 - 43 - - - 33 366 - - 563 19 2040 Build 29 - 43 - - - 33 417 - - 572 19 CSAH 101/CSAH 30 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 79 705 35 30 293 72 30 130 63 136 224 73 2028 No-Build 86 763 38 32 317 78 32 141 68 147 242 79 2028 Build 96 763 38 32 317 108 32 152 68 153 244 80 2040 No-Build 114 968 48 41 402 117 41 184 86 214 317 109 2040 Build 124 968 48 41 402 147 41 195 86 220 319 110 Table 3: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CSAH 101/Dayton Pkwy EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 2 42 20 73 59 218 43 310 184 181 207 4 2028 No-Build 2 45 22 79 64 236 47 336 199 196 224 4 2028 Build 2 45 22 111 64 236 47 355 319 196 229 4 2040 No-Build 3 58 27 217 81 299 59 438 331 248 302 5 2040 Build 3 58 27 249 81 299 59 457 451 248 307 5 CSAH 101/north access/Maple Grove access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing - - - - - - - 537 - - 300 - 2028 No-Build - - - - - - - 581 - - 325 - 2028 Build 104 - 11 - - - 3 616 - - 334 28 2040 No-Build - - - 30 - 90 737 45 135 412 - 2040 Build 104 0 11 30 0 90 3 772 45 135 421 28 CSAH 101/south access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 8 - 6 - - - 3 533 - - 299 2 2028 No-Build 9 - 6 - - - 3 577 - - 324 2 2028 Build 44 - 41 - - - 12 580 - - 335 11 2040 No-Build 11 - 8 - - - 4 777 - - 440 3 2040 Build 46 - 43 - - - 13 780 - - 451 12 CSAH 101/Stieg Road EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 27 - 25 - - - 34 513 - - 266 35 2028 No-Build 29 - 27 - - - 37 555 - - 288 38 2028 Build 29 - 27 - - - 37 567 - - 334 38 2040 No-Build 37 - 34 - - - 47 749 - - 395 48 CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.5 2040 Build 37 - 34 - - - 47 761 - - 441 48 CSAH 101/CSAH 30 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2024 Existing 142 456 18 30 592 210 33 244 44 101 123 89 2028 No-Build 154 494 19 32 641 227 36 264 48 109 133 96 2028 Build 156 494 19 32 641 234 36 267 48 137 142 105 2040 No-Build 204 626 25 41 813 315 45 344 60 157 175 128 2040 Build 206 626 25 41 813 322 45 347 60 185 184 137 2.5 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. In accordance with MnDOT traffic study guidelines, this analysis used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of acceptable traffic operations. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: · Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. · Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. · Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. · Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. · Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. · Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.6 The LOS results for the study intersections are presented below. 2024 Existing Table 4: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/B A/B CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/B A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2028 No-Build Table 5: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/south access EB Stop A/B A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB Stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2028 Build Table 6: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/north access EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/B A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. Summary: All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.7 2040 No-Build Table 7: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/D C/D CSAH 101/north access w Maple Grove access WB stop A/C A/E CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal E/F D/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. Summary: · CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. · During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. · All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2040 Build Table 8: Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal C/D C/D CSAH 101/north access w Maple Grove access EB/WB stop A/E E/F CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/E CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal E/F D/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. Summary: · CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. · During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. · CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F. During the a.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS A with all movements at LOS E or better. · All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.8 Traffic Impacts Identified · CSAH 101/CSAH 30 – Intersection operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 No-Build and 2040 Build scenarios. Improvements to this intersection are necessary under the no build scenario. · CSAH 101/north access/Maple Grove access – Intersection operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 Build scenario. A signalization of this intersection should be considered. All other intersections operate at acceptable levels of service under all scenarios. 2.6 ACCESS The concept plan for the development identifies two access locations for the development that are spaced approximately 1,800 feet apart. The southern access to the development will be located along the shared lot line with the adjacent property. With the adjacent development, the turn lanes within CSAH 101 to the future public street were installed. This development shall be responsible for removing the private access and constructing a public roadway which will extend through the development. A 40’ roadway easement was provided at the time of the development to allow for the public street to be constructed centered on the shared lot line. The northern access to the development is currently proposed approximately 900 feet from the northern property line. Hennepin County will review and control the final access location, however the proposed spacing appears to be within their spacing that was reviewed and shown with the NE District Plan. Directly to the north of the proposed access is a floodplain which is a Zone A with an undefined elevation. With this development application the floodplain elevation will be determined which will help identify the limits of the floodplain within and adjacent to the proposed development. This will in turn inform the placement of the roadway as the regulatory and permitting impacts of the floodplain and stormwater management system may have impacts on the final access location. As the roadway will also align with the future Maple Grove Parkway, coordination with the City of Maple Grove and Hennepin County will be necessary to determine the final access point. 2.7 FINDINGS · The proposed development is expected to generate 239 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 234 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,917 trips daily. · Based on the traffic forecasts, operational analysis, and system review, the following improvements are recommended to accommodate the development and mitigate impacts on the transportation system.: o CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/north access/Maple Grove Access CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.0 Transportation NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 2.9 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. o CSAH 101/south access The development shall be responsible for constructing the southern access to the development by removing the private driveway to the adjacent property and constructing a public roadway. The turn lanes from CSAH 101 onto the new access road were constructed with the previous project and no additional improvements are anticipated at this time. o CSAH 101/Stieg Road No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. These improvements are necessary of the corridor but not associated with the buildout of the development. 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 3.0 Water NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 3.1 WATER 3.1 BACKGROUND The water supply for the NE Industrial development will be provided via a 12-inch water stub available at the southeast corner of the development. The development shall be responsible for extending water infrastructure through the site. This will be connected to the Corcoran NE water system which will be serviced by the water treatment facility and water tower which are currently under construction. The findings of this report, assume that the water tower and water treatment facilities are fully operational by the time of the proposed development. As part of the development of the NE water system, a layout of proposed future well locations had identified a future well site within the development parcel to support the overall water system. A site for a future well shall be coordinated with this development and provided to the City to be constructed on in the future by the City. The well site is preferred along the western portion of the development as it will ultimately provide raw water to the new treatment facility. A corridor for future raw watermain shall be identified through the proposed development plan. The watermain through the site shall be looped through the parcel. At the NE corner of the parcel a water stub shall be provided which could be connected to the City of Maple Grove system in the future. 3.2 MODEL AND WATER SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS A map of the pipe network that was used for this modeling work is shown on Appendix A to this report. The water system performance was evaluated assuming the water service is provided by the NE Corcoran water treatment system and both the Red Barn Pet Retreat and Nelson International Trucking facilities being operational within the City water system. The water demand for the facility was assumed to be 1,500 gal/acre/day over the parcel’s net developable acreage based on the land use designation and anticipated usage. Water system was modeled for both the current water system which is proposed to utilize only a singular source from the 12- inch water stub from the south as well as the ultimate system when the 12-inch water loop is completed to the west and connected back through the Bellwether development. For commercial/industrial areas, a recommended fire flow of at least 2,500 gpm (3-hr duration) should be provided during the fire flow events with a minimum service pressure of 35 psi during the peak day demand. New commercial/industrial buildings are assumed to be sprinklered. The applicant shall review the available fire flow capacity during site planning with final users to verify fire flow capacity is acceptable for end users. During the building review process, the available fire flow should be considered by the applicant and design team to ensure that adequate fire protection is available for their facility. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 4.0 Sewer NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 4.2 Included in Appendix A of the report are the modeling results of the water system using the assumptions as outlined in this report. Below is a table which summarizes the results. The available pressure and fire flow from the existing system are adequate with greater fire capacity being provided via the ultimate looped system. The completion of the 12-inch loop may be necessary if the end users have a higher water demand than the typical land use and what was assumed in this report. Node Existing System Ultimate System Pressure (psi) Fire Flow (gpm) Pressure (psi) Fire Flow (gpm) Average Day 71-74 -- 71-74 -- Peak Hour 68-70 -- 59-62 -- Max Day 69-72 2,500-2,800 66-69 3,300-4,300 3.3 FINDINGS The following key findings and recommendation are made. Should the water demand characterization of the end users vary from the assumptions made in this report, the water system should be reviewed and additional requirements may be necessary to support users: · Looping of watermain within the development is required. Pressure and fire flow are adequate for the proposed land use. Final user shall verify that fire capacity is adequate for their facility needs. · Dedicating a lot to the City for potential future municipal well is required. Location to be determined with the southwest portion of the parcel being preferred. · A stub at the northern access street towards Maple Grove is required. Stub will terminate on western CSAH 101 ROW line. SEWER 4.1 SEWER LAYOUT Sewer service for the proposed development will be via a connection to the existing 30- inch trunk sewer located along CR 101 and the south property boundary shared with Nelson Trucking that was installed in accordance with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, A sewer stub must be constructed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan that shows a 15-inch trunk sewer stub to be extended to the west parcel line (Appendix B). CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 4.0 Sewer NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 4.3 With an industrial facility, the wastewater flow from the facility will be dependent on the final users and their specific operations within the facilities. The City Comprehensive Sewer Plan allocates 1,000 gallons per day per buildable acre from this development. To ensure the City of Corcoran collection system has capacity in accordance with the Comprehensive Sewer Plan the proposed development should be planned in accordance with this demand. If additional sewer capacity is requested of any facility users, the City shall review and determine if the overall system has the allowable capacity for those uses. Easements Permanent easements for the trunk and lateral sewers will be dedicated to the City. Where both sewer and potable water utilities are being installed in parallel, the easements must be wide enough to accommodate the required separation distance between sewer and potable water lines. Easement width is calculated using a minimum 1:1 side slope to pipe invert (for example 20 foot depth pipe requires a minimum 40 foot easement). 4.2 FINDINGS The following key findings and recommendations are made: · Developer to connect to existing trunk at location along the 30-inch trunk sewer as approved by City. · Developer to construct the 15-inch trunk sewer stub to the western property boundary. · Wastewater discharge from the development shall be in accordance with the City of Corcoran Comprehensive Sewer Plan and any deviations from that plan shall be reviewed by the City to ensure adequate capacity exists within the overall system. · Permanent easements for the trunk and lateral sewers will be dedicated to the City. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 5.0 Water Resources NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 5.1 WATER RESOURCES 5.1 REGULATORY OVERVIEW Stormwater management regulations in the proposed project area would be guided or directed by Corcoran’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (Local Plan) the City’s Guidelines, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and MS4 requirements. Each of these documents has a larger regulatory context: The Local Plan reflects the goals, policies and rules of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission’s Third Generation Watershed Management Plan (Commission’s WMP). The SWPPP is a requirement of the City’s stormwater permit, also known as the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. The MS4 permit is issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) which was reissued in October of 2021. Among other goals, both documents include plans to meet pollutant load reductions calculated in the Elm Creek Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study. TMDL studies are required for surface waters that are designated as impaired – in other words, those that do not meet one or more state water quality standards. City guidelines lay out the required modeling parameters, preferred BMPs and some construction materials. City approval is required prior to application for the WMO approval process. Further City review occurs with construction plan approval process. 5.2 WATERSHED SETTING The proposed development is situated in the Rush Creek watershed and drains west towards agricultural land and then north into the City of Rogers. Existing land use in the proposed development is agricultural and topography is gently rolling/flat. The urbanizing MUSA areas undergo changes from agricultural to non-agricultural land use that presents challenges where land use will change from row crops to commercial/industrial. Offsite Conveyances Discharge locations from the onsite BMPs will be reviewed for impact on offsite conveyances. It may be necessary to coordinate with adjacent property owners to obtain an easement, reduce velocities to lower erosion potential, construct or improve offsite conveyance to manage the developments stormwater or a combination of these approaches. Floodplain Floodplain exists on the northern portion of the property as a Zone A. The floodplain elevation shall be defined with this development, which will help inform and regulate portion of the SWMP for the facility. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 5.0 Water Resources NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 5.2 Stantec is aware of three sources of information, the Preliminary HUC-8 (2022) Study which was completed by the Elm Creek Watershed, the 2016 Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and more specific floodplain work for the Lennar development in Rogers. The watershed communities have noted that the HUC-8 had significant differences from the FIS, therefore analysis is required to determine the floodplain elevation. Hennepin County should be consulted to see if any information on the adjacent floodplains is available related to the culvert/stream crossings of CR 101. The definition of the floodplain elevation is required and adjacent stormwater BMP’s may require modifications to the site plan and CR 101 north access. Development shall be required to meet all regulatory requirements associated with the floodplain and any modifications to it. 5.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The development modifying the parcel from agricultural use to urban reduces the pervious open space and increases impervious surfaces that will impact stormwater runoff characteristics. Although elimination of agriculture can benefit water quality by reducing export of nutrients and sediments through onsite ponding and filtration (Best Management Practices or BMPs), construction of additional impervious surfaces, such as the roads, driveways, rooftops, and sidewalks increase the volume to nearby conveyances and surface waters. Mitigation is accomplished by aligning development plans with City requirements and ECWMC/MS4 stormwater regulations. Corcoran’s Local Plan, in agreement with the Commission’s WMP, requires that development plans over 1-acre disturbed area be submitted to the City and the Commission for review. The purpose of the review is to ensure that the developer’s plans for stormwater management during and after construction meet the Commission’s rules regarding the rate, volume and pollutant load of stormwater runoff, along with other rules regarding wetland alteration, erosion and sediment control and other aspects of surface water protection. The City focuses on rates of discharge, downstream impacts and long-term construction sustainability. This adherence to Commission rules on water quality (BMPs) and abstraction is one of the strategies Corcoran has chosen to also meet its TMDL obligations to reduce nutrients. The implementation plan calls on Corcoran to apply these standards when land use changes, a strategy that is predicted to have the net result of improving, or not further degrading, the water quality of stormwater runoff. Stormwater modeling guidelines are in Appendix C and may be updated prior to development’s final construction plan approval. Complementing the Local Plan, Corcoran’s SWPPP requires plan review, construction site erosion and sediment control, and post-construction stormwater management. Construction site inspections by the City will begin with land-disturbing activity and end with final stabilization of exposed soils and City acceptance of the development. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 5.0 Water Resources NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 5.3 5.4 FINDINGS Onsite · Stormwater improvements are necessary within the development to meet City guidelines and in accordance with regulations of the WMO. · To move towards meeting load reduction goals, the City’s Local Surface Water Plan identifies that improvements to water resources will occur with development. · Floodplain (Zone A) exists on the northern portion of the parcel. The floodplain elevation shall be identified and any modifications or impacts will need to be addressed during project approvals and construction. Available resources should be utilized in determining this elevation. Offsite · BMP design and hydrology review such as subwatershed contributing areas to discharge locations will be closely reviewed for potential impact to adjacent properties during platting and construction plan process. It may be necessary to coordinate with adjacent property owners to obtain an easement, reduce velocities to lower erosion potential, construct or improve offsite conveyance to manage the developments stormwater or a combination of these approaches. The City is exploring a stormwater fee that may be incorporated in 2025. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY 6.0 Funding Responsibility/Infrastructure Approach NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 6.1 FUNDING RESPONSIBILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE APPROACH The funding responsibility of the development and infrastructure necessary to mitigate impacts typically follow the approach of: · On-site infrastructure is designed, funded and constructed by the development, offsite easements and construction are typically designed as a City Project but are the funding responsibility of the development. · All trunk sewer, water fees (TLAC), and potentially stormwater area charge will be due at the time of final platting. The financial obligations of the development will be further detailed as the project moves forward and culminates in the Developer Agreement with the overall preliminary plat approval which is updated for each phase of the development. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 7.2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following infrastructure improvements are feasible and necessary to manage the development. These improvements are consistent with similar requirements for other developments in Corcoran. Transportation · Based on the traffic forecasts, operational analysis, and system review, the following improvements are recommended to accommodate the development and mitigate impacts on the transportation system.: o CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/north access/Maple Grove Access 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. o CSAH 101/south access The development shall be responsible for constructing the southern access to the development by removing the private driveway to the adjacent property and constructing a public roadway. The turn lanes from CSAH 101 onto the new access road were constructed with the previous project and no additional improvements are anticipated at this time. o CSAH 101/Stieg Road No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. These improvements are necessary of the corridor but not associated with the buildout of the development. 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. Watermain · Looping of watermain within the development is required. Pressure and fire flow are adequate for the proposed land use. Final user shall verify that fire capacity is adequate for their facility needs. · Dedicating a lot to the City for potential future municipal well is required. Location to be determined with the southwest portion of the parcel being preferred. · A stub at the northern access street towards Maple Grove is required. Stub will terminate on western CSAH 101 ROW line. CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations NOVEMBER 2024 Project Number 193806190 7.3 Sewer · Developer to connect to existing trunk at location along the 30-inch trunk sewer as approved by City. · Developer to construct the 15-inch trunk sewer stub to the western property boundary. · Wastewater discharge from the development shall be in accordance with the City of Corcoran Comprehensive Sewer Plan and any deviations from that plan shall be reviewed by the City to ensure adequate capacity exists within the overall system. · Permanent easements for the trunk and lateral sewers will be dedicated to the City. Water Resources · Stormwater improvements are necessary within the development to meet City guidelines and in accordance with regulations of the WMO. · To move towards meeting load reduction goals, the City’s Local Surface Water Plan identifies that improvements to water resources will occur with development. · Floodplain (Zone A) exists on the northern portion of the parcel and any modifications or impacts will need to be addressed as the project moves through the process. Available resources should be utilized in determining this elevation. Offsite · BMP design and hydrology review such as subwatershed contributing areas to discharge locations will be closely reviewed for potential impact to adjacent properties during platting and construction plan process. It may be necessary to coordinate with adjacent property owners to obtain an easement, reduce velocities to lower erosion potential, construct or improve offsite conveyance to manage the developments stormwater or a combination of these approaches. The City is exploring a stormwater fee that may be incorporated in 2025. FIGURES PID: 0111923410002 PID: 0111923120002 D M STIEG & J M STIEG TRSTE 19500 STIEG RD, CORCORAN, MN 55374 PID: 0611922220001 DOAA M MOUSSA & A M MOUSSA 76 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED, MAPLE GROVE, MN 00000 PID: 0611922230001 THERESA PRESCOTT 10660 BROCKTON LA N, MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 PID: 0611922230004 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL LLC 10650 BROCKTON LA N, MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 PID: 0611922230005 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL LLC 76 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED, MAPLE GROVE, MN 00000 PROPOSED ±200,200 SF BUILDING PROPOSED ±342,000 SF BUILDING 100.0' 50.0' 50' WETLAND BUFFER PROPOSED 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY 100' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK PROPOSED FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY 5' PARKING SETBACK 50 . 0 ' 5.0' 26.0' 10.0' 15.0' 19.0'19.0' 26.0' 10.0' 15.0' 19.0'19.0' 26.0' 10.0' 15.0' 19.0'19.0' 26.0' 10.0' 15.0' 60.0'70.0'60.0'70.0'60.0'60.0' 30.0'26.0' 28 . 0 ' 28 . 0 ' 26.0' 193.5' 28.5' 8.3' 10.1' 26 . 0 ' 26.0' 147.1'69 . 2 ' 69 . 2 ' 217.5' 11 4 0 . 0 ' 300.0' 60' UTILITY EASEMENT 91 0 . 0 ' 220.0' 149.1' 69 . 2 ' 60.0'35.0' 30.0' PROPOSED 80' RIGHT-OF-WAY 80.0' 18 . 0 ' 22 . 0 ' EXISTING FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY 30.0 ' 78 . 5 ' 25. 0 ' 25' PARKING SETBACK 14.0' 8.0 ' 8.0 ' 8' BERM 3' BERM BIO SWALE 8' BERM 3' BERM BIO SWALE 168.6 ' 8' BERM 8. 0 ' 5. 0 ' 60.0' 20 . 0 ' PLAZA AREA 64 8 . 8 ' TO C L O S E S T S I N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E 72 . 9 ' 217.1' 12" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 12" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 12" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 12" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED BIKE RACKS PROPOSED BIKE RACKS PROPOSED BIKE RACKS PROPOSED BIKE RACKS PROPOSED BIKE RACKS PROPOSED BIKE RACKS Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 2 3 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M G: \ M a r k e t i n g \ H E M P E L \ C o r c o r a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 4 - S I T E P L A N . d w g F e b r u a r y 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 2 : 3 0 p m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R BUILDING DATA TOTAL BUILDING AREA (EAST)±300,000 SF TOTAL BUILDING AREA (WEST)±200,000 SF PERCENT OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 14.23% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 45 FT MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 70% PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED PARKING 334 SPACES @ 1/1,500 SF PROPOSED PARKING (PASSENGER)372 SPACES PROPOSED PARKING (TRAILER)138 SPACES PR E P A R E D F O R CO N C E P T S I T E PL A N EX-1A CO R C O R A N I N D U S T R I A L HE M P E L CO R C O R A N MN LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED SCREEN SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ASPHALT PAVMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION LANDSCAPE AREAS SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILS PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 80.67 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 28.78 AC (35.7%) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 51.89 AC (64.3%) AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT 21.36 AC SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPOSED ZONING I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPOSED LAND USE INDUSTRIAL BUILDING SETBACKS RIGHT OF WAY (MAJOR) = 100' RIGHT OF WAY (MINOR) = 50' STORM WATER AREA SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILS BUILDING SEE SITE PLAN FOR DETAILS PROPOSED BIO SWALE SECTION 1 N.T.S.EXISTING GROUND 8' B E R M 3' MAX 1' 1.9'10' AT 2% NORTH APPENDIX A Water Modeling Results Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567117 4567116 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 Country Cir E Ro b ert La CR - 1 1 6 Br o c k t o n La N Darrel La Hillside D r H u n ters R d g Dassel La Oswal d F ar m Rd Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd 97th Ave N 109th Ave N Broc kton La N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e Maple Grove J-95 J-96 J-100 J-101 J-102 J-94J-103 J-158 J-182 J-183 J-185 J-186 J-187 J-188 J-189 J-190 J-191 J-192 J-245 J-246 J-247 J-248 J-249 J-254J-261 J-262 J-263 J-264 J-265 J-267 J-271 J-272 J-273 J-274 J-275 J-276 J-277J-278 J-279J-280 J-281 J-282 J-283 J-284 J-285 J-286 J-287 J-288 J-300 J-301 J-302 J-303 J-304 J-305 J-306 J-307 J-308 J-309 J-310 J-311 J-312 J-313 J-314 Northeast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Junction Water Main Diameter 6 Inch 8 Inch 10 Inch 12 Inch 16 Inch 20 Inch 24 Inch Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,000 0 375 750 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Existing System Pipe Network 1 Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567117 4567116 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 CR - 1 1 6 Br o c k t o n La N Country Cir E Ro b ert L a Alva ra d o L a N Darrel La Hillside D r H u n ters Rdg 97th Ave N Dassel La Oswa ld F ar m Rd Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd 109th Ave N Brock ton La N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n City of Maple Grove City of Corcoran City of Rogers Northeast Elevated Tank Maple GroveJ-84J-85 J-90 J-91 J-95 J-96 J-100 J-101 J-102 J-94J-103 J-158 J-182 J-183 J-185 J-186 J-187 J-188 J-189 J-190 J-191 J-192 J-245 J-246 J-247 J-248 J-249 J-254J-261 J-262 J-263 J-264 J-265 J-267 J-271 J-272 J-273 J-274 J-275 J-276 J-277J-278 J-279J-280 J-281 J-282 J-283 J-284 J-285 J-286 J-287 J-288 J-300 J-301 J-302 J-303 J-304 J-305 J-306 J-307 J-308 J-309 J-310 J-311 J-312 J-313 J-314 Northeast WTP Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Junction Water Main Diameter 6 Inch 8 Inch 10 Inch 12 Inch 16 Inch 20 Inch 24 Inch Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,000 0 375 750 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Ultimate System Pipe Network 2 Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567116 4567117 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 Country Cir E Ro b ert L a Br o c k t o n La N Alva rad o L a N Darrel La Hillside D r CR - 1 1 6 H u n ters R d g Dassel La Oswa ld F a r m Rd Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd 97th Ave N 109th Ave N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Corcoran City of Rogers 70.6 70.2 71.5 71.1 68.5 65.9 66.368.9 70.2 75.9 71.5 71.1 77.1 77.6 71.5 68.9 69.8 68.5 68.9 69.3 74.5 70.6 67.2 69.1 67.268.9 66.3 67 66.2 66.1 65.8 70.2 70.2 69.8 69.3 68.9 70.6 69.870.2 68.571.5 69.4 73.7 75 72.4 69.8 65.9 67.2 71.5 72.9 71.5 71.8 71.8 69.3 69.6 72.2 74 74 71.3 74.1 74.1 72.2 74.1 73.1 Northeast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main System Water Pressure < 35 PSI 35-50 PSI 50-65 PSI 65-80 PSI 80-95 PSI > 95 PSI Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,251 0 375 750 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Existing System Avg Day Pressure 3 System Conditions: Average day demand: 0.41 MGD Storage Tank: 5 ft below HWL # of HSP on:1 Maple Grove Connection: OFF Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567117 4567116 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 Country Cir E Ro b ert La CR - 1 1 6 Br o c k t o n La N Darrel La Hillside D r H u n ters R d g Dassel La Oswal d F ar m Rd Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd 97th Ave N 109th Ave N Broc kton La N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000> 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 4938.2 4863.4 4794.5 4746.8 4728.9 4554.6 4552.1 4423.2 4395.7 4209 4167.3 4142 4037 3990.1 3931.9 3788.6 3683.2 3440 3398.7 3394.2 3367.5 3305.73305.5 3227.1 3193.5 3146 3146 3096.9 3089.6 3069.6 3045.2 3045.2 3007 2817.5 2809.5 2773.3 2753.1 2749.92695.5 2593 2517.3 2510.8 2470.6 2459.7 1558.9 Northeast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Fire Flow 500 - 1,000 GPM 1,000 - 2,500 GPM 2,500 - 3,500 GPM > 3,500 GPM Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,000 0 375 750 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Existing System Max Day Available Fire Flow 4 System Conditions: Max Day Demand: 1.24 MGD Storage Tank: 10 ft below HWL # of HSP on: 2 Maple Grove Connection: OFF Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567117 4567116 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 A l v ara do La N CR - 1 1 6 Br o c k t o n La N Country Cir E Ro b ert La Darrel La Hillside D r H u n ters R d g Dassel La Os w a l d F a r m R d 97th Ave N Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La Country Rd 109th Ave N Brockton La N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Corcoran City of Rogers Northeast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP 70.468.663.5 74.6 66.1 69.9 71.2 70.8 68.3 65.7 6668.6 70 75.8 71.4 70.9 76.9 77.3 71.2 68.6 69.5 68.2 68.7 69 74.2 70.4 66.9 68.9 67.168.8 66.2 67 66.2 66.1 65.7 69.9 70 69.5 69.1 68.7 70.4 69.670 68.371.3 69.1 73.5 74.7 72.1 69.6 65.6 66.9 71.2 72.6 71.2 71.5 71.5 69.1 69.3 71.9 73.7 73.7 71 73.7 73.7 71.9 73.7 72.8 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main System Water Presure < 35 PSI < 35-50 PSI < 50-65 PSI < 65-80 PSI < 80-95 PSI < 95 PSI Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,000 0 375 750 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Ultimate System Avg Day Pressure 5 System Conditions: Average day demand: 2.28 MGD Storage Tank: 5 ft below HWL # of HSP on:1 Maple Grove Connection: OFF Anoka County Hennepin County Sherburne County Wright County VVPTW 4567116 4567117 4567116 4567101 4567101 456730 CR - 1 1 6 Country Cir E Ro b ert L a CR - 1 1 6 Br o c k t o n La N Darrel La Hillside D r H u nters R d g Dassel La Os w a l d F a r m R d Stieg Rd CR - 1 1 6 Jackie La 97th Ave N Country Rd 109th Ave N Brock ton La N 97th Ave N Ci t y o f C o r c o r a n Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Corcoran City of Rogers Northeast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP > 5000> 5000> 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000> 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000> 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 > 5000 4929 4812.5 4749.9 4714.2 4660.3 4614.4 4539.2 4475.2 4320.9 4312.1 4239.24229.7 4173.8 4155.7 3468.1 3388.2 3387.1 3355.3 3324.6 3284.1 3115.1 2893 2736.9 2578.2 1602.6 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ a c t i v e \ 1 9 3 8 0 6 1 9 0 \ 0 3 _ d a t a \ g i s _ c a d \ g i s \ p r o \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y \ F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 1 - 0 5 B y : t w a v r i n Legend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries NE Industrial Development LocationVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Fire Flow 500 - 1,000 GPM 1,000 - 2,500 GPM 2,500 - 3,500 GPM > 3,500 GPM Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 11x17) 1:9,000 0 700 1,400 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-11-05 T119N, R23W, S06 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806190 City of Corcoran NE Industrial Feasibility Study Ultimate System Max Day Available Fire Flow 6 System Conditions: Max Day Demand: 6.01 MGD Storage Tank: 10 ft below HWL # of HSP on: 2 Maple Grove Connection: OFF APPENDIX B Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan !O !O !O #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pio n e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S ettle rs R d Stie g R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake 456710 R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Trunk Water System.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:36:40 PM User: ShuJC0243 Existing WatermainProposed Watermain !O Potential Water Tower Locations #*Existing Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #*Proposed Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #* Emergency Connection withNeighboring Communities(Normally Closed) #*Potential Water Storage #*Potential Booster StationPotential Future Well Exploration AreasMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 9-2Trunk Water System 137 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H Ci t y o f M a p l e G r o v e City of Rogers DuffneyDr County Road 10 Hillside Dr Hunt ers R d g Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Schutte Farm R d H i d d e n PondsDr C herry Ln Robert Ln C ount y Road 30 J a c k i e L n Ca i n R d Schutte L n Eb e r t R d Country Rd Pat ric k Pl Lily Pond Ln Darrell Ln Osw aldFarm Rd Oakdale Dr Dassel Ln Stie g R d Shannon L n S c hu t t e Rd Rush Meadow Ln My st ique Dr 93rd Ave N S u n n y Hill L n Br a n d y w i n e R d Rush Creek SouthForkRushCreek S o u t h ForkRush Creek NE-M NE-S NE-C NE-A NE-B NE-D NE-G NE-H NE-L NE-E NE-JNE-I NE-F NE-N NE-T NE-K NE-R NE-V NE-U NE-O NE-Q NE-W NE-P SE-AP SE-AQ SE-AF 15 ' ' 30 ' ' 8' ' 8'' 30 ' ' 30'' 15 ' ' 30 ' ' 3 0 ' ' 1 0 ' ' 8' ' 10 ' ' 10'' 12 ' ' 15 ' ' 30'' 30 ' ' 12''15'' 6' ' 30'' 30 ' ' 30 ' ' NE-1 NE-2 NE-3 NE-4 NE-5 NE-6 NE-7 NE-8 NE-9 NE-10 NE-11 NE-12 NE-13 (LS) NE-14 NE-15 NE-16 NE-17 NE-18 Elm Creek Interceptor NE-19 NE-20 NE-21 NE-22 NE-23 456710 456730 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,500 0 1,500750 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\NE Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer_LS.mxd Date: 1/8/2019 Time: 7:15:58 AM User: ShuJC0243 !Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Proposed Forcemain !H Sewer Nodes (LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-2Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - NE District 115 APPENDIX C Stormwater Guidelines Stormwater Guidelines for Development March 2019 Issue Cities changing from rural to urban development are challenged by the additional stormwater generated due to construction of impervious surfaces, along with the offsite infrastructure, or lack thereof, to manage effectively. To standardize the modeling and review process, the guidelines below were created for efficiency. Note: A watershed approval is required per Elm Creek WMO rules, which also reviews flow rates, water quality and volume management. Modeling Watershed Information · Provide an aerial photo of the development that includes the overall watershed and subwatershed boundaries · Provide a summary of the acreage to each discharge point leaving the site. Any increase (or decrease) shall be identified. · Show any floodplain adjacent to project or within the project · Show downstream water bodies and flow paths o Downstream flow paths and water bodies typically need to have elevations, inverts, and condition identified. Subwatersheds A HydroCAD model (typically used) has inputs that can vary by user. To minimize resubmittals, review time and effort, the following data shall be utilized. · Electronic model shall be submitted · Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) shall be lowered one category due to the mass grading and compaction of the soils. For example, an existing B soil, shall be modeled as a proposed C soil (unless it remains undisturbed) · Wetlands, filtration basins, and ponds shall be modeled at CN of 98 · Identify peak rates for storm events and proposed shall be equal or less than existing rates. o Note: There are certain conditions where at City’s discretion the off-site conditions require a reduction in flow rate from existing rates. · SWMM (i.e. EPA-, XP-, or PC-) models can be submitted for review, however these increase review time. Model Setup for Outlet Control Structures, NWLs and Infiltration · The model’s flow control structures (OCS, culverts, etc.) shall match the construction plan information. During the plan and model review both may be modified and revised · Individual detail plates are required for each OCS, and individual plates shall have inverts identified · A pond or wetland NWL (and model starting elevation) shall be set at the constructed outlet control elevation. o No live storage shall be utilized below the controlling OCS elevation. o No live storage shall be used for filtration shelves on ponds below controlling OCS elevation · If a pond or wetland has an NWL (wet surface), infiltration shall not be used in flood routing. · If a pond has filtration BMP causing drawdown below the NWL, this drawdown elevation shall not be used as the NWL for flood routing. (Filtration has a slower release time and during wet periods is not available as live storage). Construction Plans Catch Basins · Street drainage shall be sufficient to manage the 10-year event · Typical a CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly · Three inches (0.25 feet) of head on a CB will inundate a street centerline (2% slope). · Spacing is 200 to 250 feet using longitudinal street dimensions of 40 feet from road centerline to half the house footprint (assumes rear half of house drains to rear yard). Dimensions equal 10,000 SF. · CBs may be required on both sides of ped ramps to capture flows Natural Drainage Features · Waterbodies receiving urban drainage (wetlands, ditches, gullies) may need to have OCS installed, erosion protection, or reduced flow rates to allow the feature to function over the long term due to more consistent flows from increased impervious via development · Offsite work may be necessary and City will assist with coordination, easements, etc. HWLs and EOFs · The freeboard requirements are: o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the HWL o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the EOF · EOFs shall be accurately shown and as builts are required. The highest point shall be the EOF (for example top of curb) since this is the controlling elevation o In certain instances, channel calculations of the swale may be required to show the EOF has capacity to manage estimated flow · Overland EOFs are preferred, however if a second pipe serves as an EOF then modeling will include a 100-year event using the second pipe (EOF) as the only outlet (primary outlet plugged). Rear Yards · Rear yards or swales less than 2% shall have draintile. Typically, every two to three lots will require rear yard CBs. Sump Connections · Houses adjoining a wetland or pond do not need individual sump connection · Others will have access to rear yard stormsewer. Offsite Impacts Adjacent Parcels · City will review adjacent parcels (downstream and upstream) for impacts from volume, point discharge, etc. and may require off site improvements. City will assist in coordination of any off site work. · Off site water quality improvement projects may be determined by the City for assistance with compliance with City’s TMDL approach of implementing improvements upon development. · FEMA modifications may be necessary due to development and implemented by City. Floodplain Location Appendix E NHIS Query and IPaC Species List Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 1 of 6 Formal Natural Heritage Review - Cover Page See next page for results of review. A draft watermark means the project details have not been finalized and the results are not official. Project Name: Corcoran Industrial Northeast Project Proposer: Hempel Real Estate Project Type: Development, Commercial/Institutional/Industrial Project Type Activities: Tree Removal;Grading;Structure Removal or Bridge Removal;Waterbody or watercourse impacts (e.g., dewatering, discharge, excavation, fill, runoff, sedimentation, changes in hydrology));Wetland impacts (e.g., dewatering, tiling, drainage, discharge, excavation, fill, runoff, sedimentation, changes in hydrology) TRS: T119 R23 S1, T120 R23 S36 County(s): Hennepin DNR Admin Region(s): Central Reason Requested: State EAW Project Description: Hempel Real Estate is proposing to develop Brockton Business Park, a light industrial park located in northeast Corcoran. The Project would create two ... Existing Land Uses: The Project area primarily consists of agricultural land. A farmstead is present in the southeast portion of the Project area. The remainder of the Project ... Landcover / Habitat Impacted: Land cover within the Project area consists of agricultural land, grass/shrub, wetlands, ponds, and mixed forest. Impacts to these habitats, including ... Waterbodies Affected: No lakes, rivers, or streams are located within the Project area. Approximately 18 acres of emergent wetlands and ponds are present within the Project ... Groundwater Resources Affected: The Project area is not within a Wellhead Protection Area (WPA) or a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). Impacts to groundwater are not anticipated ... Previous Natural Heritage Review: No Previous Habitat Assessments / Surveys: No SUMMARY OF AUTOMATED RESULTS Category Results Response By Category Project Details Comments Tree Removal - Recommendations Ecologically Significant Area No Comments No Further Review Required State-Listed Endangered or Threatened Species No Comments No Further Review Required State-Listed Species of Special Concern No Comments No Further Review Required 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 2 of 6 Category Results Response By Category Federally Listed Species No Records Visit IPaC For Federal Review 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 3 of 6 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological & Water Resources 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155-4025 October 11, 2024 Project ID: MCE #2024-00852 Mia Bauer Stantec One Carlson Parkway, Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55447 RE: Automated Natural Heritage Review of the proposed Corcoran Industrial Northeast See Cover Page for location and project details. Dear Mia Bauer, As requested, the above project has been reviewed for potential effects to rare features. Given the project details provided on the cover page, I do not believe the proposed project will negatively affect any known occurrences of rare features. To ensure compliance with federal law, conduct a federal regulatory review using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool. Project Type and/or Project Type Activity Comments The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) tracks bat roost trees and hibernacula plus some acoustic data, but this information is not exhaustive. Even if there are no bat records listed below, all of Minnesota’s bats, including the federally endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), can be found throughout Minnesota. During the active season (approximately April- November) bats roost underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Tree removal can negatively impact bats by destroying roosting habitat, especially during the pup rearing season when females are forming maternity roosting colonies and the pups cannot yet fly. To minimize these impacts, the DNR recommends that tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS), a collection of databases that contains information about Minnesota’s rare natural features, is maintained by the Division of Ecological and Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources. The NHIS is continually updated as new information becomes available, and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, and other natural features. However, the NHIS is not an exhaustive inventory and thus does not represent all of the occurrences of rare features within the state. Therefore, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist within the project area. If additional information becomes available regarding rare features in the vicinity of the project, further review may be necessary. 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 4 of 6 For environmental review purposes, the results of this Natural Heritage Review are valid for one year; the results are only valid for the project location and the project description provided on the cover page. If project details change or construction has not occurred within one year, please resubmit the project for review before initiating project activities. The Natural Heritage Review does not constitute project approval by the Department of Natural Resources. Instead, it identifies issues regarding known occurrences of rare features and potential impacts to these rare features. For information on the environmental review process or other natural resource concerns, you may contact your DNR Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist. Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. Sincerely, Jim Drake Jim Drake Natural Heritage Review Specialist James.F.Drake@state.mn.us Links: USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool DNR Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist Contact Info https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/ereview/erp_regioncontacts.html 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 5 of 6 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Corcoran Industrial Northeast MCE #: 2024-00852 Page 6 of 6 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 10/11/2024 09:08 AM Appendix F Greenhouse Gas Analysis Calculations Scope Source CO2 (ton/yr) CH4 (ton/yr) N2O (ton/yr) CO2e (ton/yr) Scope 1 Construction - Mobile Sources Onroad - Gasoline and Diesel 107 0.0009 0.0031 108 Scope 1 Construction - Mobile Sources Non-road - Diesel 590 0.054 0.050 605 Scope 1 Operations - Stationary Combustion - Natural Gas 887 0.0168 0.00163 888 Scope 1 Operations - Mobile Sources - Gasoline and Diesel 29,290 0.209 0.819 29,520 Scope 2 Purchased Electricity 1,764 0.19 0.027 1,777 Scope 3 Waste - Operations 1,282 32,637 0.5 0.90 34,178 Lifetime 1,708,914 Total Project Emissions Corcoran NE Industiral Project GHG Emissions Summary Direct Emissions Indirect Emissions Corcoran NE Industiral Project Source ID Description Building Activity Bldg Square Footage Natural Gas Combustion (scf/yr) Electricity Usage (kWh/yr) Office Corporate office buildings Office 108,000 2,840,400 1,296,000 Light Industrial Warehouse/Light Industrial Warehouse and Storage 432,000 11,966,400 2,246,400 Total 540,000 14,806,800 3,542,400 Project Information Construction Emissions Mobile Source Information Construction 5 Years (estimate) Project Lifetime 50 Years (estimate) Onroad/Off- Road Vehicle Type1 Number of Vehicles per Day2 Fuel Type Vehicle Year3 VMT (miles per day, per vehicle)2 Miles per Gallon4 Fuel Usage (gal/day, all vehicles)Days Per Year2 Miles Traveled (mi/yr, all vehicles) Fuel Usage (gal/yr, all vehicles) Miles Traveled (mi) Fuel Usage (gal)CO2 (kg/gal)CH4 (g/mile)N2O (g/mile) CO2 (short ton) CH4 (short ton) N2O (short ton) CO2e (short ton) CO2 (short ton/yr) CH4 (short ton/yr) N2O (short ton/yr) CO2e (short ton/yr) Onroad Light Duty Vehicles - Laborers (commute)50 Gas 2011 20 21.4 46.80 260 260,000 12,168 1,300,000 60,840 8.78 0.0071 0.0046 587.59 0.0102 0.00658 590 11.8 0.00020 0.00013 11.796 Heavy Duty Trucks - Dump Trucks (onsite and offsite)20 Diesel 2011 60 7.9 151.35 260 312,000 39,350 1,560,000 196,751 10.21 0.0095 0.0431 2,209.71 0.0163 0.0740 2,232 44.2 0.00033 0.0015 44.643 Heavy Duty Trucks - Semis (onsite and offsite)20 Diesel 2011 60 6.9 173.61 260 312,000 45,138 1,560,000 225,689 10.21 0.0095 0.0431 2,534.71 0.0163 0.0740 2,557 50.7 0.00033 0.0015 51.143 Total 5,332 0.043 0.154 5,379 106.6 0.00086 0.0031 107.6 5. Emission factors based on the U.S. EPA's Emission Factors Hub (https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub, updated April 2022). Onroad/Offr oad Vehicle Type Number of Vehicles1 Fuel type Engine Size (hp)1 Consumption Rate (gal/hour per hp- hr)2 Hours per Year3 Total Gallons per Year Total Gallons for Project CO2 (kg/gal)CH4 (g/gal)N2O (g/gal) CO2 (short ton) CH4 (short ton) N2O (short ton) CO2e (short ton) CO2 (short ton/yr) CH4 (short ton/yr) N2O (short ton/yr) CO2e (short ton/yr) Off-road Crane 4 Diesel 250 0.05 2,080 104,000 520,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 5840.12 0.538 0.498 6,002 116.8 0.0108 0.0100 120.0 Backhoe 6 Diesel 125 0.05 2,080 78,000 390,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 4380.09 0.403 0.373 4,501 87.6 0.0081 0.0075 90.0 Loader 8 Diesel 250 0.05 2,080 208,000 1,040,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 11680.24 1.075 0.995 12,004 233.6 0.0215 0.0199 240.1 Excavator 4 Diesel 250 0.05 2,080 104,000 520,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 5840.12 0.538 0.498 6,002 116.8 0.0108 0.0100 120.0 Skid Steer 6 Diesel 50 0.05 2,080 31,200 156,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 1752.04 0.161 0.149 1,801 35.0 0.0032 0.0030 36.0 28 525,200 2,626,000 Total 29,493 2.715 2.513 30,309 589.9 0.05431 0.0503 606.2 1. Estimates based on similar development projects. 2. Off-road mobile source fuel usage based on South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Table A9-3E. 3. Based on 8 hr/day, 5 day/wk, 52 wk/yr. 4. Emission factors based on the U.S. EPA's Emission Factors Hub (https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub, updated April 2022). Total 2. Estimates based on similar development projects. 3. Assumed, based on the national average age of cars and light trucks on the road in 2021 (https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2022/05/24/average-american-car-12-years-old/9907901002/). 4. For light duty vehicles, based on 1995-2020: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics (Washington, DC: Annual Issues), table VM-1, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics.cfm as of October 2024. For heavy duty vehicles, average miles per gallon values from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2022 (February 2024), Table VM-1. Emission Factors4 Total Project Emissions Emissions Annualized over Project Lifetime (50 yrs) 1. Vehicle types are defined by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Light duty vehicle, short wheel base replaces the old category passenger car and includes passenger cars, light trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles with a wheelbase (WB) equal to or less than 121 inches. Light duty, long wheel base replaces "Other 2-axle, 4-tire vehicle and includes large passenger cars, vans, pickup trucks, and sport/utility vehicles with wheelbases larger than 121 inches. Light Duty Vehicles includes all vehicles in the short and long wheel base category. Annual Total for Project Emission Factors5 Total Emissions (ton)Emissions Annualized over Project Lifetime (50 yrs) Scope 1 Emissions from Stationary Combustion Sources Guidance - Select "Fuel Combusted" from drop down box. (C) Biomass CO2 emissions are not reported in the total emissions, but are reported separately at the bottom of the sheet. Table 1. Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Source Source Source Fuel Fuel State Quantity ID Description Area (sq ft)Combusted (solid, liquid, gas)Combusted BLR-012 East Power Plant 12,517 Natural Gas Gas 10,000 MMBtu Office Corporate office buildings 108,000 Natural Gas Gas 2,840,400 SCF Warehouse Warehouse 432,000 Natural Gas Gas 11,966,400 SCF GHG Emissions Total Organization-Wide Stationary Source Combustion by Fuel Type Quantity Combusted Coal and Coke - Solid Anthracite Coal 0 short ton Bituminous Coal 0 short ton Sub-bituminous Coal 0 short ton Lignite Coal 0 short ton Mixed (Commercial Sector)0 short ton Mixed (Electric Power Sector)0 short ton Mixed (Industrial Coking)0 short ton Mixed (Industrial Sector)0 short ton Coal Coke 0 short ton Other Fuels - Solid Municipal Solid Waste 0 short ton Petroleum Coke (Solid)0 short ton Plastics 0 short ton Tires 0 short ton Biomass Fuels - Solid Agricultural Byproducts 0 short ton Peat 0 short ton Solid Byproducts 0 short ton Wood and Wood Residuals 0 short ton Gaseous Fuels Natural Gas 14,806,800 scf Propane Gas 0 scf Landfill Gas 0 scf Petroleum Products Distillate Fuel Oil No. 2 0 gallons Residual Fuel Oil No. 6 0 gallons Kerosene 0 gallons Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG)0 gallons Biomass Fuels - Liquid Biodiesel (100%)0 gallons Ethanol (100%)0 gallons Rendered Animal Fat 0 gallons Vegetable Oil 0 gallons Total Organization-Wide CO2, CH4 and N2O Emissions from Stationary Source Fuel Combustion CO2 (kg)CH4 (g)N2O (g) Anthracite Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Bituminous Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sub-bituminous Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lignite Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mixed (Commercial Sector)0.0 0.0 0.0 Mixed (Electric Power Sector)0.0 0.0 0.0 Mixed (Industrial Coking)0.0 0.0 0.0 Mixed (Industrial Sector)0.0 0.0 0.0 Coal Coke 0.0 0.0 0.0 Municipal Solid Waste 0.0 0.0 0.0 Petroleum Coke (Solid)0.0 0.0 0.0 Plastics 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tires 0.0 0.0 0.0 Natural Gas 806,082.2 15,251.0 1,480.7 Propane Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 Landfill Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distillate Fuel Oil No. 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Residual Fuel Oil No. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Kerosene 0.0 0.0 0.0 Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG)0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Fossil Fuel Emissions 806,082.2 15,251.0 1,480.7 Agricultural Byproducts 0.0 0.0 0.0 Peat 0.0 0.0 0.0 Solid Byproducts 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wood and Wood Residuals 0.0 0.0 0.0 Biodiesel (100%)0.0 0.0 0.0 Ethanol (100%)0.0 0.0 0.0 Rendered Animal Fat 0.0 0.0 0.0 Vegetable Oil 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Non-Fossil Fuel Emissions 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Emissions for all Fuels 806,082.2 15,251.0 1,480.7 Total CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Stationary Combustion 806.9 Total Biomass CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Stationary Combustion 0.0 Units (B) If fuel is consumed in a facility but stationary fuel consumption data are not available, an estimate should be made for completeness. See the "Items to Note" section of the Help sheet for suggested estimation approaches. Fuel Type - Enter "Quantity Combusted" and choose the appropriate units from the drop down box in the unit column. If it's necessary to convert units, common heat contents can be found on the "Heat Content" sheet and unit conversions on the "Unit Conversion" sheet. (A) Enter annual data for each combustion unit, facility, or site (by fuel type) in ORANGE cells on Table 1. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ). Fuel Type Units Petroleum Products Biomass Fuels - Liquid Coal and Coke - Solid Gaseous Fuels Biomass Fuels - Solid Other Fuels - Solid Back to Intro Back to Summary HelpHeat Content EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Direct 1.0)1 of 1 Mobile Source - Operations Onroad/Off- Road Vehicle Type1 Vehicle Driver Daily Trips2 Fuel Type Vehicle Year3 VMT (miles per trip)4 Miles per Gallon5 Fuel Usage (gal/day, all vehicles) Days Per Year6 Miles per Year (per Vehicle) Miles per Year All Vehicles Fuel Usage (gal/yr, all vehicles)CO2 (kg/gal)CH4 (g/mile)N2O (g/mile) CO2 (short ton/yr) CH4 (short ton/yr) N2O (short ton/yr) CO2e (short ton/yr) Light Duty Vehicle, Short Wheel Base (Passenger Cars, small trucks and SUVs)Office Workers 383 Gas 2011 30 21.4 537.48 365 10,950 4,198,230 196,179 8.78 0.0071 0.0046 1,899 0.03 0.02 1,906 Heavy Duty Trucks Shipping 1534 Diesel 2011 30 6.9 6667.83 365 10,950 16,792,920 2,433,757 10.21 0.0095 0.0431 27,391 0.176 0.798 27,633 Total 29,290 0.21 0.82 29,539 1. Assumes employees drive gasoline powered light duty vehicles and deliveries are made by heavy duty diesel vehicles. 2. Estimate, based on 1,917 daily trips from the traffic study split as 20% office employees and 80% warehousing employees. 4. Assumes 30 miles per trip for all vehicles. 6. Assume daily trips take place 365 days per year. Emission Factors7 Emissions Onroad 3. Assumed, based on the national average age of cars and light trucks on the road in 2021 (https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2022/05/24/average-american-car-12-years-old/9907901002/). 5. For light duty vehicles, based on 1995-2020: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics (Washington, DC: Annual Issues), table VM-1, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics.cfm as of Dec. 29, 2021. For heavy duty vehicles, average miles per gallon values from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2020 (November 2022), Table VM-1. Scope 2 Emissions from Purchase of Electricity Guidance (C) Select "eGRID subregion" from drop box and enter "Electricity Purchased." https://www.epa.gov/egrid/power-profiler#/ Tips: Enter electricity usage by location and then look up the eGRID subregion for each location. Table 1. Total Amount of Electricity Purchased by eGRID Subregion Source Source Source eGRID Subregion Electricity CO2 CH4 N2O CO2 CH4 N2O CO2 CH4 N2O ID Description Area (sq ft)where electricity is consumed Purchased Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions (kWh)(lb/MWh)(lb/MWh)(lb/MWh)(lb)(lb)(lb)(lb)(lb)(lb) Bldg-012 East Power Plant 12,517 HIMS (HICC Miscellaneous)200,000 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 226,880.0 27.0 4.2 Office Corporate office buildings 108,000 MROW (MRO West)1,296,000 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>1,290,556.8 138.7 19.4 1,290,556.8 138.7 19.4 Light Indust Warehouse/Light Industrial 432,000 MROW (MRO West)2,246,400 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>2,236,965.1 240.4 33.7 2,236,965.1 240.4 33.7 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> Total Emissions for All Sources 3,542,400 3,527,521.9 379.0 53.1 3,527,521.9 379.0 53.1 GHG Emissions CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) Location-Based Electricity Emissions 1,611.6 Market-Based Electricity Emissions 1,611.6 Notes: 1. CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions are estimated using methodology provided in EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership Greenhouse Gas Inventory Guidance - Indirect Emissions from Purchased Electricity (January 2016). (D) See the market-based emission factor hierarchy on the market-based method Help sheet. If any of the first four types of emission factors are applicable, enter the factors in the yellow cells marked as "<enter factor>". If not, leave the yellow cells as is, and eGRID subregion factors will be used for market-based emissions. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ) for a facility that purchases RECs for 100% of its consumption, and therefore has a market-based emission factor of 0. The Indirect Emissions from Purchased Electricity Guidance document provides guidance for quantifying two scope 2 emissions totals, using a location-based method and a market-based method. The organization should quantify and report both totals in its GHG inventory. The location- based method considers average emission factors for the electricity grids that provide electricity. The market-based method considers contractual arrangements under which the organization procures electricity from specific sources, such as renewable energy. - Use map (Figure 1) at bottom of sheet to determine appropriate eGRID subregion. If subregion cannot be determined from the map, find the correct subregion by entering the location's zip code into EPA’s Power Profiler: (A) Enter total annual electricity purchased in kWh and each eGRID subregion for each facility or site in ORANGE cells of Table 1. (B) If electricity consumption data are not available for a facility, an estimate should be made for completeness. See the "Items to Note" section of the Help sheet for suggested estimation approaches. If you purchase renewable energy that is less than 100% of your site's electricity, see the example in the market-based method Help sheet. Location-Based Emission Factors Emissions Emissions Market-Based Use these cells to enter applicable market-based emission factors Back to Intro Back to Summary Help Help - Market-Based Method Help - Market-Based Method EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Indirect 1.0)1 of 2 Figure 1. EPA eGRID2021, January 2023. EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Indirect 1.0)2 of 2 Scope 3 Emissions from Waste 0 0 Guidance Table 1. Waste Disposal Weight by Waste Material and Disposal Method (CO2, CH4 and N2O) Source ID Source Description Waste Material Disposal Method Weight Unit CO2e Emissions (kg) Bldg-012 East Power Plant Finished Goods Copper Wire Landfilled 1,000 metric ton 22,040 Office Corporate office buildings Mixed MSW municipal solid waste Landfilled 219 short ton 113,880 Light Industrial Warehouse/Light Industrial Mixed MSW municipal solid waste Landfilled 2,018 short ton 1,049,214 GHG Emissions Total Emissions by Disposal Method Waste Material CO2e (kg) Recycled - Landfilled 1,163,094 Combusted - Composted - Anaerobically Digested (Dry Digestate with Curing)- Anaerobically Digested (Wet Digestate with Curing)- Total CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Waste 1,163.1 (A) Enter annual waste data in ORANGE cells. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ). (B) First, choose the appropriate material then the disposal method from the drop down options. For the average-data method, use one of the mixed material types, such as mixed MSW. If the exact waste material is not available, consider an appropriate proxy. For example, dimensional lumber can be used as a proxy for wood furniture. (C) Choose an appropriate disposal method. Note that not all disposal methods are available for all materials. If there is a #NA or # Value error in the emissions column, you must pick a new material type or appropriate disposal method. Back to Intro Back to Summary Help EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Optional 3.0)1 of 1 Appendix G Traffic Impact Study File #193806190 October 29, 2024 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. One Carlson Pkwy, #100 Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Corcoran 8200 CR 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Traffic Impact Study for Corcoran Industrial NE in Corcoran, MN October 2024 i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 6-1 7.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 7-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................. 4-3 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: October 29, 2024 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 October 2024 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the impacts of an industrial development in Corcoran, MN. The project site is located west of CSAH 101 south of Dayton Parkway. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed project at the following intersections: • CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway • CSAH 101/north access/future street (future only) • CSAH 101/south access • CSAH 101/Stieg Road • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 The proposed project will involve construction of two buildings totaling 542,200 square feet in size. For purpose of this study, the buildings are assumed to contain 108,440 square feet of office space and 433,760 square feet of warehouse space. Access will be provided at two locations on CSAH 101. The project is expected to be completed in 2028. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 239 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 234 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,917 trips daily. • Overall traffic impacts: o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 – Intersection operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 No-Build and 2040 Build scenarios. o CSAH 101/north access/future street – Intersection operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 Build scenario. o All other intersections operate at acceptable levels of service under all scenarios. • Based on the traffic forecasts and operations analysis for each intersection, the following mitigation measures are recommended: o CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/north access/future street ▪ 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. ▪ 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. October 2024 1-2 o CSAH 101/south access ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/Stieg Road ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 ▪ 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. ▪ 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. October 2024 2-1 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the impacts of an industrial development in Corcoran, MN. The project site is located west of CSAH 101 south of Dayton Parkway. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed project at the following intersections: • CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway • CSAH 101/north access/future street (future only) • CSAH 101/south access • CSAH 101/Stieg Road • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve construction of two buildings totaling 542,200 square feet in size. For purpose of this study, the buildings are assumed to contain 108,440 square feet of office space and 433,760 square feet of warehouse space. Access will be provided at two locations on CSAH 101. The project is expected to be completed in 2028. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. October 2024 2-2 October 2024 2-3 October 2024 3-1 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed project site is currently used for agriculture purposes. The site is bounded by CSAH 101 on the east, an industrial use on the south, and agricultural uses and wetlands on the north and west. Near the site location, CSAH 101 is a two lane roadway with turn lanes and traffic signal control at major intersections. Dayton Parkway is a four lane divided roadway with interchange access at I-94. Stieg Road is a two lane local roadway which connects to CR 116 to the west. CSAH 30 is a two lane east/west roadway that expands to four lanes in Maple Grove to the east. Existing conditions near the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. CSAH 101/south access This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through lane. The southbound approach provides one through lane and one right turn lane. The west leg currently serves as access for an existing industrial use. CSAH 101/Stieg Road This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through lane. The southbound approach provides one through lane and one right turn lane. CSAH 101/CSAH 30 This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. Traffic Volume Data Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at the existing intersection s in September, 2024. Existing traffic volume data is presented later in this report. October 2024 3-2 October 2024 4-1 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project and other development in the area, forecasts and analyses were completed for the years 2028 and 2040. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2024 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by existing uses near the project site. • 2028 No-Build. Existing volumes were increased by 2.0 percent per year to account for background growth in the surrounding area. The growth rate was based on historic growth in the area. • 2028 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2028 No-Build volumes to determine 2028 Build volumes. • 2040 No-Build. Existing volumes were increased by 2.0 percent per year to account for background growth in the surrounding area. The growth rate was based on historic growth in the area. • 2040 Build. Trips generated by the development were added to the 2040 No-Build volumes to determine 2040 Build volumes. CSAH 101/north access/future street The proposed project includes a new access point on CSAH 101 located approximately 1,800 feet north of the south access. For purpose of this study, the access was assumed to be located across from a future new public street in Maple Grove. Traffic volumes were estimated for the new street using information presented in the Northwest – 610 Master Plan dated November 2019 developed by the City of Maple Grove. The new street was assumed to be in place by 2040. Minor street stop sign control with left and right turn lanes on CSAH 101 were assumed for the initial traffic analysis. Trip Generation for Proposed Project The expected new development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. October 2024 4-2 Table 4-1 Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour 8:30 to 9:30 a.m. Weekday PM Peak Hour 3:30 to 4:30 p.m. Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Office (ITE 710) 108,440 SF 145 20 165 27 129 156 1,175 Warehouse (ITE 150) 433,760 SF 57 17 74 22 56 78 742 Totals 202 37 239 49 185 234 1,917 Note: SF=square feet Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population con centrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 65 percent to/from the east on Dayton Parkway • 10 percent to/from the north on CSAH 101 • 15 percent to/from the east on CSAH 30 • 5 percent to/from the west on CSAH 30 • 5 percent to/from the south on CSAH 101 Traffic Volumes Development trips from Table 4-1 were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 4. October 2024 4-3 October 2024 5-1 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersection s for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. In accordance with MnDOT traffic study guidelines, this analysis used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of acceptable traffic operations. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay range s from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds f or a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. October 2024 5-2 The LOS results are described below. All LOS worksheets are included in the Appendix for further detail. 2024 Existing Weekday Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/B A/B CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/B A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2028 No-Build Weekday Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/south access Signal A/B A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road WB stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 NB stop C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2028 Build Weekday Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/C B/D CSAH 101/north access EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/B A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal C/E C/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. All intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. October 2024 5-3 2040 No-Build Weekday Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal B/D C/D CSAH 101/future street WB stop A/C A/E CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/C A/C CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal E/F D/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2040 Build Weekday Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway Signal C/D C/D CSAH 101/north access/future street EB/WB stop A/E E/F CSAH 101/south access EB stop A/C A/D CSAH 101/Stieg Road EB stop A/C A/E CSAH 101/CSAH 30 Signal E/F D/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F. During the p.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/CSAH 30 operates at LOS D with all movements at LOS E or better. CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F. During the a.m. peak hour, CSAH 101/north access/future street operates at LOS A with all movements at LOS E or better. All other intersections operate at LOS C or better and all movements operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Overall Traffic Impacts • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 – Intersection operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 No-Build and 2040 Build scenarios. • CSAH 101/north access/future street – Intersection operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 Build scenario. • All other intersections operate at acceptable levels of service under all scenarios. October 2024 5-4 Recommended Mitigation Based on the traffic forecasts and operations analysis for each intersection, the following mitigation measures are recommended: • CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway o No improvements needed under any scenario. • CSAH 101/north access/future street o 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. o 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. • CSAH 101/south access o No improvements needed under any scenario. • CSAH 101/Stieg Road o No improvements needed under any scenario. • CSAH 101/CSAH 30 o 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. o 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. October 2024 6-1 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 239 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 234 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,917 trips daily. • Overall traffic impacts: o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 – Intersection operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour, with the southbound right turn, eastbound through, and eastbound right turn movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 No-Build and 2040 Build scenarios. o CSAH 101/north access/future street – Intersection operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour, with the eastbound movements operating at LOS F under the 2040 Build scenario. o All other intersections operate at acceptable levels of service under all scenarios. • Based on the traffic forecasts and operations analysis for each intersection, the following mitigation measures are recommended: o CSAH 101/Dayton Parkway ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/north access/future street ▪ 2028 Build – Construct northbound and southbound left turn and right turn lanes on CSAH 101. ▪ 2040 Build – Install traffic signal control. o CSAH 101/south access ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/Stieg Road ▪ No improvements needed under any scenario. o CSAH 101/CSAH 30 ▪ 2040 -No-Build – Construct southbound right turn lane on CSAH 101 and eastbound right turn lane on CSAH 30. ▪ 2040 Build - No additional improvements needed. October 2024 7-1 7.0 Appendix • Level of Service worksheets 3: CSAH 101 & south access 2024 AM 10/30/2024 2024 Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 2024 AM 10/30/2024 2024 Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 3: CSAH 101 & south access 2028 AM No Build 10/30/2024 2028 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 2028 AM No Build 10/30/2024 2028 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 1: CSAH 101 & noth access 2028 AM Build 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 3: CSAH 101 & south access 2028 AM Build 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 2028 AM Build 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 1: CSAH 101 & noth access/new street 2040 AM No Build 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 3: CSAH 101 & south access 2040 AM No Build 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 2040 AM No Build 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 1: CSAH 101 & noth access/new street 2040 AM Build 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 3: CSAH 101 & south access 2040 AM Build 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 2040 AM Build 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM 3: CSAH 101 & south access 10/30/2024 2024 Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 10/30/2024 2024 Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2028 PM No Build 3: CSAH 101 & south access 10/30/2024 2028 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2028 PM No Build 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 10/30/2024 2028 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2028 PM Build 1: CSAH 101 & noth access 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2028 PM Build 3: CSAH 101 & south access 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 6th TWSC 2028 PM Build 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 10/30/2024 2028 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM No Build 1: CSAH 101 & noth access 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM No Build 3: CSAH 101 & south access 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM No Build 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 10/30/2024 2040 No Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM Build 1: CSAH 101 & noth access 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 42.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM Build 3: CSAH 101 & south access 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 PM Build 5: CSAH 101 & Stieg 10/30/2024 2040 Build Synchro 11 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6h. Council Meeting December 18, 2024 Prepared By Jay Tobin Topic 2025 Fee Schedule Action Required Approval Summary Fee changes are highlighted in the attachment. Staff anticipate updates throughout the year to the fee schedule as needed. Financial/Budget The new fees will impact the 2025 budget. Options 1. Adopt proposed ordinance for the 2025 Fee Schedule. 2. Amend and adopt ordinance for the 2025 Fee Schedule. Recommendation Staff recommends adopting proposed ordinance for the 2025 Fee Schedule. Council Action Consider a motion to adopting proposed ordinance for 2025 Fee Schedule. Attachments 1. 2025 Fee Schedule 2. Ordinance adopting 2025 Fee Schedule. Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule Agenda Attachment 6h1. Administrative Fees Records & Service for City Document Maps Code Books Recycling Fee Copies City Park - Picnic Facility Labor/Staff Research City Facility Rentals Late Fees / Penalties / Cancellation Processing Fees General Licenses & Permits Other Permits/Licenses Liquor/Tobacco Lawful Gambling Registration of Cannabis Businesses Rental License Public Safety Police Reports Firearm & Hunting Permits Car Seat Checks Rental Fee Police Patch Vehicle Impound Finger Printing Animal Impound False Alarm Fire/Medical Emergency Event Security Rates False Alarm Police Emergency Communications Systems Fee Burning Permit Fire Department Entry Key Lock Box Public Works Equipment Usage Street Department Fees Public Works Labor Grading & Land Disturbance Permit Lawn Mowing - Property Cleanup Overweight Vehicle Permit Swing Away Mail Box Arms Utility Permit Planning Development & Zoning Fees Land Use Permit/Application Sign Permit Fence Permit Utility Rates Water Fees Connection Fees Sanitary Sewer Fees Other Utility Fees Building Permit and Related Fees Building Permit Emergency Communications Systems Fee Plan Review Fee Over the Counter Permit State Surcharge Other Inspections and Fees SEC Fee Certificate of Survey Zoning & Set Back Review Penalty City of Corcoran 2025 FEE SCHEDULE Table of Content Records & Service for City Document (Includes Tax) Assessment Search from County USB Flash Drive Interest charge on 30 day past due Escrow accounts Notary Fee - per document Candidate Filing Fee Code Books Code Book (Codes/Zoning/Subd) Binder Municipal Code Only Subdivision Code Only Zoning Code Only Comprehensive Plan Book Printed - special order Copies Copies Black/White - up to 8 1/2x14 per page Copies Black/White - 11 x 17 per page Copies Color up to 8 1/2x14 pp Copies Color 11x17 Copies Oversize (Larger than 11X17) - Special Order Labor/Staff Research Data Request Retrieval Cost per hour Data Request Copies - Per Page (up to 100 pages) Normal Business Hrs (1 hr minimum) per hour After Hours (1 hr minimum) per hour Late Fees / Penalties / Cancellation Returned Check Fee ACH Return / NSF (non-sufficient fund) Chargeback Delinquent Fee Permit Cancellation Fee Processing Fees Recreation Credit Card Processing Fee - Transactions under $100.00 Recreation Credit Card Processing Fee - Transactions over $100.00 InvoiceCloud Credit Card Processing Fee - Utility Bills ($2.95 minimum) InvoiceCloud Credit Card Processing Fee - Building Permits ($2.95 minimum) InvoiceCloud Credit Card Processing Fee - Invoices ($2.95 minimum) InvoiceCloud Credit Card Processing Fee - Miscellaneous Maps Color Maps - on cardstock Oversized or Laminated - special order Topos - special order Recycling Fee Recycling Fee - Annually Recycling Delinquent Fee Recycling Provider Late Fee City Park - Picnic Facility Group 1 (Local Non-Profit Groups): NW Area Jaycees, Corcoran Lions, Pioneer Society, NW Trails, Corcoran Garden Club, St. John's Lutheran School *Damage deposit required Group 2: Corcoran Residents *Damage deposit required Damage Deposit - Required for All Rentals / Amenities Pavilion Rental Fee Soccer/Football/Baseball - per field (per hour usage | minimum 2 hours) Lights (Lions Field only) - Additional per game Scoreboard and PA System (Snyder Field only | per game)$25.00 $65.00 $35.00 $35.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 2025 FEE SCHEDULE $100.00 $30.00 $30.00 $1.50 Varies Salary of the lowest-paid entity employee who can complete the task $65.00 2025 FEE $25.00 $10.00 10% $1.00 $10.00 $65.00 $100.00 $0.25 $0.55 $1.00 $10.00 3.25% 3.25% $3.00 $2.50 $0.25 Varies $25.00 N/C 4.19% less $4.19 1.25% N/C 10% Discount $100.00 Varies $79.20 $10.00 1.5% per month $350.00 $22.00 $30.00 Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 2025 FEE SCHEDULE 2025 FEE City Facility Rentals Mutiple Date Change Fee (1 Date Change Per Year Free) Liquor/Tobacco Temporary 3.2 Malt Liquor License - 1 - 4 Day Event Temporary Malt Liquor License - 1 - 4 Day Event Temporary 3.2 Malt Liquor License - Annual Max On Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Off Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Investigation (New/Transfer License) On Sale Intoxicating Liquor On Sale Wine Off Sale Intoxicating Liquor (Fee limited by State Law) Sunday Sale Intoxicating Liquor (Fee limited by State Law) Investigation Fee (New/Transfer License) 2:00 am Closing Tobacco License Lawful Gambling Exempt Gambling Permit - Held at Non-Premise Permitted Site Exempt Gambling Permit - Held at a Premise Permitted Site (ie. Conducts Regular Charitable Gambling Activities Registration of Cannabis Businesses Cannabis Business Initial Retail Registration Cannabis Business Renewal Retail Registration Cannabis Medical Combination Initial Registration Temporary Cannabis Event Permit $50.00 Civil penalties for illegal sale to a customer without valid registration (subject to M.S. 342.22) First Violation $500.00 Second violation within 36-month $1,000.00 Third and subsequent violation within 36-month $2,000.00 Other Permits/Licenses Fireworks Permit - Per Event Hobby Kennel - Annual Fee Solid Waste Hauler License Application Rental Licenses Single-family homes, twin-homes, and townhomes License Fee (per unit) Re-inspection Fee (per unit) Conversion Fee Apartments License Fee (per per building plus $15.00 per unit) Re-inspection Fee (per unit) Conversion Fee Penalty for renewal applications filed and fees paid after July 1st (renewal date) (for each 30 days after July 1, but no more than 60 days) Filing fee for appeal of compliance order $100.00 $100.00 $75.00 $200.00 $75.00 N/C $100.00 $50.00 $75.00 $150.00 $50.00 $75.00 N/C $50.00 1/2 the amount of an initial state license fee under M.S. 342.11 or $500, whichever is less 1/2 the amount of an renewal state license fee under M.S. 342.11 or $1,000, whichever is less 1/2 the amount of an initial state license fee under M.S. 342.11 or $500, whichever is less $2,000.00 $150.00 $200.00 $300.00 Paid to State $100.00 $100.00 $25.00 $100.00 $4,000.00 GENERAL LICENSES & PERMITS $25.00 $25.00 $10.00 Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 2025 FEE SCHEDULE 2025 FEE Reinstatement Fee Illegal Rental Operation/Let of Property First Violation Second violation within 24-month Third and subsequent violation within 24-month $100.00 $500.00 $150.00 $250.00 Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule Police Reports Police Reports - Per Page (up to 100 pages) Audio/Video on USB Flash Drive Normal Business Hrs (1 hr min.) per hour Car Seat Checks Resident Non-Resident - 1st Seat Non-Resident - Additional Seats Police Patch Police Patch - Available Only to Full-time Police Officers Finger Printing Resident Non-Resident Additional Cards - Resident Additional Cards - Non-Resident False Alarm Fire/Medical Emergency 2-3 In any 12-month period ( Each) 4+ In any 12-month period (Each) False Alarm Police 1-3 In any 12-month period 4+ In any 12-month period Burning Permit Valid for 1 month Valid for 6 months Firearm & Hunting Permits Shooting Range Annual Review Fee Goose Lake Hunting Permit Permit to Purchase/Transfer Rental Fee Range contract per day (law enforcement agencies only) Command Post per day Vehicle Impound Vehicle Impound Release Storage Fee Daily Animal Impound 1st Offense (Plus impound fees to shelter) 2nd and Subsequent Offenses (Plus impound fees to shelter) No Kennel License Event Security Rates Officer - per hour Officer - per hour Holiday rate Reserve Officer - per hour Emergency Communications Systems Fee Per Single Residential Unit Up to 4 Units Up to 10 Units For Any Number of Units Above 10 Units Fire Department Entry Key Lock Box DAMA Box and/or Mounting Kits Recreational Vehicle Permit Recreational Vehicle Permit *Term depends on year issued $10.00 $0.25 2025 FEE $25.00 PUBLIC SAFETY $10.00 Salary of the lowest-paid entity employee who can complete the task N/C N/C $5.00 N/C $25.00 N/C $5.00 $75.00 $150.00 $100.00 $250.00 $10.00 N/C Cost plus 10% $10.00 per year $30.00 $100.00 $200.00 $500.00 2025 FEE SCHEDULE $10.00 $50.00 $1,000.00 $21.48 $42.96 $50.00 $100.00 $125.00 $100.00 $250.00 $10.00 $35.00 Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule Equipment Usage Per Hour (Government Agency Assistance) Tractor/Backhoe Dump Truck Front End Wheel Loader Road Grader Skid Loader Wood Chipper Public Works Labor Per Hour Lawn Mowing - Property Cleanup Mowing 1 acre & under Mowing over 1 acre - $315 + additional hourly rate Contract tree and weed removal Contract rubbish removal Swing Away Mail Box Arms (Sales Tax included) Post only (mailbox not included) Post and Installation (mailbox not included) Street Department Fees Street Sign Install Labor (Per hour) Bituminous Trail Reimbursement Cost (per lineal foot) Culvert priced per foot Grading & Land Disturbance Permit Greater than 50 Cubic Yards (or less than 50 Cubic Yards non-exempt) One Acre or greater of disturbance Driveway Review (New or Altered Access) *Escrow Determined by City Engineer or City Representative Engineering Review - per hour Overweight Vehicle Permit Agriculture Commercial Tow Truck Daily Permit - Non Exempt Emergency Seasonal - Emergency (Septic, Liquid Propane & Similar) No Permit Penalty All Charges are Per Truck - Permits are Restricted Utility Permit Utility Work in the Right-of-Way - IE:Comcast, Century Link, CenterPoint Energy, Wright-Hennepin, etc Local Government Unit Fees Non-Refundable Application Fee Escrow Exemption Certificates $200.00 $1,000.00 Determinations $200.00 $1,000.00 Delineation Review $200.00 $2,000.00 Pond Excavations $200.00 $1,000.00 Wetland Replacement Plans <10,000 SF Impact on Single Basins or , 1/4 Acre Impact for Private Driveways $400.00 $2,000.00 All Other Replacement Plans $400.00 $2,500.00 Replacement Plan in Conjunction with Wetland Banking $400.00 $3,500.00 All Other Wetland Banking Applications $400.00 $3,500.00 Monitoring - Per Basin $400.00 $6,000.00 * Additional Weland Replacement Plan and Banking Escrows and Sureities are determined on a site-specific basis. Wetland Conservation Act Violations (Restoration Order) Any person or entity that fails to obtain a permit under City Ordinance prior to performing work shall pay a penalty of two times the original permit fee and shall be required to pay all costs associated with enforcement, including reasonable attorney’s fees. PUBLIC WORKS 2025 FEE 2025 FEE SCHEDULE $215.00 Per FEMA's Current Schedule of Equipment Rates $65.00 $315.00 $85.00 Cost + 65.00 Cost + 65.00 $130.00 N/C $75.00 $22.00 Cost + 65.00 $100.00* $300.00* $100.00* Varies - $1,000.00 Minimum Contract Rate $100.00 $750.00 $100.00 N/C Double Fee Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule Land Use Permit/Application Type Non-Refundable Application Fee Escrow Agriculture Preserve Application - Placement (fee limited by state) $50.00 Agriculture Preserve Application - Removal (fee limited by state) $50.00 Administrative Permit $100.00 $1,000.00 Minor Subdivision, Lot Line Adjustment/Consolidation $100.00 $1,500.00 Certificate of Compliance $80.00 Development Rights Appeal $100.00 $500.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $1,000.00 $2,200.00 Conditional Use Permit (CUP)$550.00 $2,200.00 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment $200.00 $1,000.00 Environmental Review $500.00 $5,000.00 Interim Use Permit $500.00 $2,000.00 Final Plat – Base Fee Regular / OSP $400.00 $5,000.00 Final Plat – Per Lot Regular /OSP $15.00 Residential Park Dedication Fees (Subdivision Ordinance) Section 955 Single Family Per Unit $5,954.00 Multi Family Per Unit $4,040.00 Commerical and Industrial Per Acre $5,866.00 Preliminary Plat – Base Regular / OSP $400.00 $5,000.00 Preliminary Plat – Per Lot Regular / OSP $15.00 PUD -Preliminary Development Plan $575.00 $5,000.00 PUD - Final Development Plan $500.00 $5,000.00 PUD - Sketch Plat/Plan Review $450.00 $2,000.00 Rezoning $575.00 $2,000.00 Sign - Wetland Buffer Sign (per sign - requires site inspection)$20.00 Sign - Development Notice Sign First Sign $165.00 Each Additional Sign $50.00 Site Plan $425.00 $1,500.00 Site Plan Amendment - Minor $200.00 $1,000.00 Sketch Plat/Plan Review - Regular / OSP $450.00 $1,750.00 Topography Exemption, Wetland Waiver, Electronic File Waiver $200.00 $1,000.00 Vacation $350.00 $1,000.00 Variance $550.00 $2,000.00 Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $700.00 $2,000.00 Zoning Letter $65.00 Infrastructure Feasibility Study / Review $5,000.00 Additional Escrow May Be Required on a Project by Project Basis Meeting with City Consultants and City Staff (first hour no charge)Over 1 hour Contract fee $500.00 Public Works Director Review - per hour $90.00 Development Superintendent/Engineer Review - per hour $75.00 Additional Escrow May Be Required on a Project by Project Basis City Planner Review - per hour $65.00 Community Development Director Review Fee - per hour $85.00 Additional Escrow May Be Required on a Project by Project Basis Fence Permit Fence (residential within 6’ of property line)$35.00 Zoning and Setback Review Only Sign Permit No Planning Commission Review - Temporary $35.00 No Planning Commission Review - Permanent $150.00 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT AND ZONING 2025 FEE Any fence taller than 7’ requires a building permit fee based on valuation + state surcharge 2025 FEE SCHEDULE Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule WATER FEES Residential Water Base Fees - per month Water Usage Rates - residential (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Tier 1: 0 gallons to 4,999 gallons Tier 2: 5,000 gallons to 8,999 gallons Tier 3: 9,000 gallons to 19,999 gallons Tier 4: 20,000 gallons and over Multi-Residential (7+ units) Water Base Fees - per month Water rates - Multi-residential (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Tier 1: 1,000 gallons + * REU = residential equivalent unit Non-Residential Water Base Fees - per month Non residential - Under 1" Meter Non residential - 1" to 3" Meter Non residential - Over 3" Meter Water rates - non residential (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Tier 1: 1,000 gallons + Safe Drinking Water Fee (Per MN Safe Drinking Water Act) SANITARY SEWER FEES Residential Sewer Base Fees - per month Sewer rates - residential (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Existing Customers - Based on Winter Water Usage (November-March) New Customers - Based on 4,500 gallons per month Multi-Residential Sewer Base Fees - per month Sewer rates - non residential (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Tier 1: 1,000 gallons + Non-Residential Sewer Base Fees - per month Sewer rates - non residential (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Tier 1: 1,000 gallons + Manufactured Homes Park Sewer rates - (monthly use) per 1,000 gallons Maple Hill Estates (804,000 gallons per month) CONNECTION FEES Trunk Line Availability Charge (TLAC) Watermain & Raw Water - Trunk Line Availability Charge (TLAC) - per acre: Southeast Treatment & Storage - Trunk Line Availability Charge (TLAC) - per acre: Southeast Watermain & Raw Water - Trunk Line Availability Charge (TLAC) - per acre: Northeast Treatment & Storage - Trunk Line Availability Charge (TLAC) - per acre: Northeast Sewer Trunk Line Availability Charge (TLAC) - per acre Connection Fees - City of Corcoran Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Single Family Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Multi-Family Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Non-Residential Sewer Connection Fee (per unit) - Single Family Sewer Connection Fee (per unit) - Multi-Family Sewer Connection Fee (per unit) - Non-Residential $0.81 $26,256.60 $3.28 $4.19 2025 FEE SCHEDULE UTILITY 2025 FEE $22.95 $2.68 $3.21 $4.02 $5.18 $22.95 $3.21 $28.36 $28.36 $36.72 $3.21 $32.30 $32.30 $3.28 $3.28 $32.30 $3.28 $9,681.86 $13,099.76 $12,852.17 $7,919.16 $1,372.80 $1,096.97 $1,372.80 $1,357.95 $1,086.36 $1,357.95 Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule 2025 FEE SCHEDULE UTILITY 2025 FEE Connection Fees - City of Maple Grove (Per Maple Grove Fee Schedule) Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Residential/individual laundry facilities Water Connection Fee (per unit) - Residential/ no individual laundry facilities Water Connection Fee (per acre) - Commercial/Industrial/Mixed Institutional Water Connection Fee (per acre) - All other Churches which do not house weekday school, preschool, and/or daycare activities Parks, per acre (0.5 times low density residential rate) Volumetric Charges - per 1,000 gallons Connection Fees - Metropolitan Council Sewer Access Charge (SAC) Meter Fees Meter - standard Meter - larger than standard Meter Inspection Meter - Temporary Installation OTHER UTILITY FEES Miscellaneous Fees Maple Grove Serviced Properties Broken Water Meter Fee - payable by each user for each month (Based on 4,500 gallons of water used per month) Late/Past Due Payments Delinquent Utility Fee Late Payment Penalty Water Disconnect Water Reconnect Bulk Water Sales Set Up/Administrative Fee Water Meter Rental Deposit Tier 1: 1,000 gallons + $13,226.00 $3,306.00 $2,645.00 $6,613.00 $1,654.00 $2.60 $2,485.00 Cost plus 10% Cost plus 10% $65.00 $65.00 $3.21 Cost plus 10% $12.05 $10.00 10% of unpaid bill $65.00 $65.00 $65.00 $1,000.00 Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule TOTAL VALUATIONS BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE (Residential & Commercial) $1.00 to $500.00 $21.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $21.00 for the first $500.00 plus $2.75 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00. $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $62.25 for the first $2,000.00 plus $12.50 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00. $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $349.75 for the first $25,000.00 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00. $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $574.75 for the first $50,000.00 plus $6.25 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00. $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $887.25 for the first $100,000.00 plus $5.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000.00. $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $2,887.25 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.25 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00. $1,000,001.00 and up $5,012.25 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof BUILDING VALUATION STATE SURCHARGE* One Million or less .0005 x valuation with minimum of $1.00 for Flat Rate Permits [up to $10,010 valuation] $1,000,001 to $2,000,000 $ 500 + .0004 x (Value -$1,000,000) $2,000.001 to $3,000,000 $ 900 + .0003 x (Value - $2,000,000) $3,000,001 to $4,000,000 $1200 + .0002 x (Value - $3,000,000) $4,000,001 to $5,000,000 $1400 + .0001 x (Value - $4,000,000) Greater than $5,000,000 $1500 + .00005 x (Value - $5,000,000) 2025 FEE SCHEDULE BUILDING PERMIT AND RELATED Sediment and Erosion Control (SEC) Fee: .0005 x permit valuation for all new construction, additions, accessory buildings, etc. Minimum $150.00 New Home or Commercial Construction, Minimum $50.00 on any other non-exempt construction. ZONING AND Set Back Review : $25.00 for permits requiring review, $75.00 for New Construction plus any costs for City Planner to review. Agricultural Structure requires a Certificate of Compliance. EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS FEE: $100.00 for new construction single family homes. Multiple residential unit rates per adopted fee schedule. Building Permit Fee - Fee is 100% of the adopted fee schedule above, plus applicable reviews, and State surcharge fees as listed below. Plan Review Fee: 65% of the Building Permit Fee calculated from the above schedule. Similar Plan Review Fee: 25% of the Building Permit Fee calculated from the above schedule. (Per MN State Building Code 1300.0160 Subp. 5 and 6) PLAN REVIEW FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE STATE SURCHARGE: Based on the table below. For valuation use the fees listed above Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule 2025 FEE SCHEDULE BUILDING PERMIT AND RELATED Re-Roof, Re-side and Windows $90.00 each + State Surcharge Fee ($1.00) Commercial Re-roof, Re-side, Window/Door Replacement (with no alterations to openings; review and applicable fees apply if alterations are required) Based on Valuation, Permit fee and State Surcharge Only (if no review required). Add review fee if alterations are required. General Plumbing (Residential) $50.00 minimum + additional $5.00 per fixture + State Surcharge Fee ($1.00)Water Heaters / Water Softeners (change out only)Water Heater $35.00 per unit + State Surcharge Fee ($1.00) Water Softener $35.00 per unit + State Surcharge Fee ($1.00) Water Heaters / Water Softeners (replacement)$35.00 per unit + State Surcharge Fee ($1.00) Mechanical (Residential) $75.00 per unit + State Surcharge Fee ($1.00) (Furnace, AC or Gas line) Additional $10.00 gas fitting/connection fee for each unit over 3 units The following qualify as a “unit” Furnace, AC, Air Exchange, In-floor heat, Boiler, Geothermal System, Ground System Heat Pump, Garage Heater, etc. Gas Fireplace $75.00 + State Surcharge Fee ($1.00) Inspection outside normal business hours; minimum two hour charge$90.00 per hr. Re-inspection Fee (minimum one hour charge)$65.00 per hr. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated (Minimum one hour charge) $65.00 per hr. Site Inspection Fee RESIDENTIAL $45.00 ea. COMMERCIAL $80.00 ea. Additional plan review required by changes, additions, or revisions to approved plans (min. ½ hour charge)$60.00 per hr. Miscellaneous and special services per contract $60.00 per hr. Water Hook Up/Connection Permit (Plan review and inspection of the connection to the municipal water system for existing properties)$100.00 Sewer Hook Up/Connection Permit (Plan review and inspection of the connection to the municipal water system for existing properties)$100.00 Pre-Move inspection $150.00 ea. Moved – In structure (not including foundation, interior remodel, etc.)$250.00 ea. Commercial Plumbing permit and plan review Based on valuation Commercial Mechanical permit and plan review Based on valuation Electrical Inspections (Residential & Commercial)Per State Inspector Demolition Residential $150.00 + State Surcharge ($1.00) Commercial $250.00 + State Surcharge ($1.00) Mobile Home Installation $250.00 + State Surcharge ($1.00) Permit Cancellation Fee $35.00 + Plan Review Fee Replacement Permit Card Fee $35.00 Expired Permit Re-issue Fee (Expired permits may be re- issued at the diescrection of the City.) $35.00 Minimum up to 100% of permit fee *See Public Works Fee Schedule for Land Disturbance and Utility Permits OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES *State Surcharge fee is subject to State changes. OVER THE COUNTER PERMITS Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule 2025 FEE SCHEDULE BUILDING PERMIT AND RELATED New Construction Escrow (grading and landscaping; due at permit issuance) $5,000.00 minimum ($10,000.00 maximum) Driveway $5,000.00 Wetland buffer $3,000 Damaged sidewalk, trail, city infrastructure, or neighboring property $1,000.00 - $5,000.00 Other incomplete site work Varies based on estimate Financial Guarantee (Escrow/Contractor Surety) A refundable financial guarantee may be required on some projects. The amount shall be determined based on the project. A minimum of $1,000 cash escrow shall be deposited for all projects requiring a financial guarantee and shall be due prior to permit issuance. The escrow may include charges for staff time and/or costs incurred by the City to gain compliance with project requirements. All fees are to be paid at time of permit issuance City Ordinance Title IV: 40-2 Certificate of Survey requirement. A certificate of survey shall be required with all building permit applications for new construction and building permits that enlarge or alter the footprint of an existing structure. Application for exemption (Building permits only) – If the proposed structure meets all of the required setbacks from the property line, flood plain, wetlands and easements by two times. Certificate of Survey PENALTY Any person or entity that fails to obtain a permit under City Ordinance Title lV: 40-40.04 prior to performing work shall pay a penalty of two times the original permit fee and shall be required to pay all costs associated with enforcement, including reasonable attorney’s fees. New Construction Escrow Additional Escrow may be required if any site work is incomplete at C.O. per the fee schedule below Exhibit A: City of Corcoran Fee Schedule Page 1 of 1 City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2024-540 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING 2025 FEE SCHEDULE The Corcoran City Council ordains as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The Corcoran City Council has determined that the fees to be charged by the City for development, inspections, and other related services shall be adopted by ordinance. Section 2. Amendment of 2025 Fee Schedule. The fees to be charged by the City of Corcoran for 2025 are listed on the attached Exhibit A, (copy is available at City Hall); that said fee schedule is hereby adopted. Section 3. Continuation/Amendment. Any amendment to the fee schedule shall be made annually, or more often if necessary, by ordinance; if there are no amendments to the fee schedule, the most recently adopted fee schedule ordinance shall remain in force and effect until amended. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its publication and passage. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 12th day of December, 2024. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: City Seal Debra Johnson – City Clerk Agenda Attachment 6h.2. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 6i. Council Meeting: December 12th, 2024 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson / Lauren Letsche Topic: Authorize Feasibility Study – Chisholm Trail Street & Drainage Improvements Action Required: Decision Summary: Annually, the City of Corcoran identifies and completes a street maintenance overlay project based on existing road conditions. For 2025, staff has selected the Chisholm Trail neighborhood as shown on the attached figure. This neighborhood only has access off County Road 30 and is a paved surface inside the development. The condition of the pavement has deteriorated significantly and is showing signs of failure that may warrant an alternative lower cost reconstruction of the pavement section as compared to the typical maintenance overlay. With this consideration, staff is recommending that council approve a feasibility study to evaluate potential street and drainage improvements. Stantec has provided the following scope and estimate to complete the report in the amount of $8,370. • Field survey and site investigation: $3,654 • Report preparation and engineering review: $4,716 Staff will solicit geotechnical subsurface data collection and analysis. The estimate to complete this work is $7,500. Additionally, staff recommends that the council consider approval to get appraisals of the properties in the neighborhood for potential assessment. The estimate to complete this work is $2,500. If the council supports this request, staff will coordinate public engagement efforts with the neighborhood and collect feedback from the residents. The feasibility study and appraisals are a requirement for the city to consider potential assessments to the adjacent neighboring properties. Financial/Budget: It is likely that the improvements will be funded through a combination of sources including special assessments & local participation. At this stage, it is unknown how the actual percentages will break down. The 2025 budget allocates approximately $250,000 for asphalt maintenance projects. Based on preliminary staff projections, we anticipate that the feasibility study could identify a substantial funding gap beyond what has been budgeted for in 2025. However, street improvements to this road are warranted and the design information and financing options obtained from the feasibility study will remain valuable in the future. Staff is proposing that the initial costs for the feasibility study be paid out of the 2025 asphalt maintenance operating budget. For reference the cities assessment policy is provided in attachment 3 which was last updated in 2019. Options: 1. Approve Stantec to complete a feasibility study in the amount of $8,370. 2. Approve staff to solicit proposals for geotechnical subsurface data collection & analysis. 3. Approve staff to get appraisals of the properties in the neighborhood. 4. Send back to staff for further review. 5. Decline. Recommendation Approve Stantec to complete a feasibility study in the amount of $8,370. Approve staff to solicit proposals for geotechnical subsurface data collection & analysis and get appraisals of the properties in the neighborhood. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve Stantec to complete a feasibility study in the amount of $8,370 as well as approve staff to solicit a proposal for geotechnical subsurface data collection & analysis and get appraisals of the properties in the neighborhood. Attachments: 1. Project Location Map 2. Stantec Chisholm Trail Feasibility Study Memo 3. Assessment Policy: Dated 2019 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County 456730 97th Ave N C hi s ho l m Tr Hig h B l u f f L a Project Area Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯ V: \ 2 2 7 7 \ r e s o u r c e \ g i s \ C o r c o r a n \ P r o \ G e n e r a l F i g u r e s \ C h i s h o l m T r a i l \ C h i s h o l m T r a i l . a p r x R e v i s e d : 2 0 2 4 - 1 2 - 0 4 B y : t w a v r i n Legend Project Area County Parcels Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: MNDOT, Hennepin County Imagery 3. Background: Hennepin County Aerial, 2024 (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:6,000 0 250 500 Feet Prepared by TAW on 2024-12-04 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN City of Corcoran Project Location 1 Item 6i.1 December 2, 2024 Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55340 Dear Kevin: Reference: Chisholm Trail Feasibility Study We appreciate the opportunity to present this scope of work to prepare a feasibility study for an improvement project on Chisholm Trail. The proposed improvements include roadway improvements and limited drainage conveyance/ditching improvements adjacent to the roadway. It is assumed that a portion of the project costs will be financed through special assessments and the feasibility study will be completed in accordance with Minnesota State Statute 429, which outlines the requirements to utilize special assessments as well as the City of Corcoran Assessment Policy. This portion of Chisholm Trail is in a deteriorating condition and is in need of roadway improvements. This feasibility study will review the current condition of the roadway as well as the costs associated with those improvements. Localized improvements to the storm sewer ditches and piping will be reviewed with this study but no stormwater modelling is anticipated with this scope of work. The following scope of work is provided to complete the feasibility study. Scope of Work Task 100 – Feasibility Study Stantec will perform the following tasks in completing the feasibility study ·Visual Field investigation to assess drainage conditions, culvert conditions and any associated drainage improvements ·Prepare project figures, material takeoffs and cost estimates ·Attend neighborhood open house meeting. ·Review roadway conditions and potential improvement alternatives appropriate for the condition of the roadway. ·Prepare preliminary assessment roll in accordance with Assessment Policy ·Review assessment roll alternatives and calculate mill and overlay credits, as appropriate ·Draft and assemble Feasibility Study Item 6i.2 December 2, 2024 Kevin Mattson PE Public Works Director Page 2 of 3 Reference: Chisholm Trail Improvements Feasibility Study Engineering totals are as follows: Task Cost Task 100 – Feasibility Study $8,370 Total $8,370 Closing We hope this letter defines the of scope work and the estimated fee of services to your satisfaction. Stantec will complete this scope of work according to the Master Services Agreement and previous practices with the City of Corcoran. On behalf of our Stantec team, we thank you for this opportunity to be of service to your community. Regards, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Kent Torve PE (MN, TX, SD), LEED AP City Engineer/ Principal Phone: 612.209.7919 Kent.torve@stantec.com Steve Hegland, PE (MN) Client Manager Phone: 612-741-6548 steven.hegland@stantec.com December 2, 2024 Kevin Mattson PE Public Works Director Page 3 of 3 Reference: Chisholm Trail Improvements Feasibility Study By signing this proposal, City of Corcoran authorizes Stantec to proceed with the services herein described and the work will be completed in accordance with the existing Master Service Agreement. This proposal is accepted and agreed on the ___________ day of _________,_________ . Per: __________________________ _____________________________ __________________________ Print Name & Title Signature Page 1 of 19 Special Assessment Policy Purpose: The City's special assessment policies and procedures have been established to: 1.Provide a stable and continuing source of funding within the financial capacity of the City, in combination with federal, state, county, and other local financial resources available to the City, to accommodate infrastructure needs for new development, redevelopment, and maintenance within the existing community in the most cost-effective manner. 2.Balance needs and costs for new and existing infrastructure to support and promote economic development and growth as well as maintenance within the existing community by providing for the equitable distribution of infrastructure costs to ensure that specific developments are financially self-supporting to the extent warranted. 3.Provide a comprehensive, well-constructed and well-maintained infrastructure system that services individual properties and takes advantage of economies on a regional scale and flexibility in the timing of infrastructure development. 4.Respond to community needs and desires for health, safety, welfare; accessibility, and mobility provided by new infrastructure and the maintenance of existing infrastructure. 5.Function in harmony with the City's comprehensive plan and growth area plans by providing the infrastructure and amenities associated with those plans thereby promoting orderly growth in areas where services are available or can be provided at the most reasonable cost. 6.Provide the City Council and staff with guidelines and methods to efficiently distribute infrastructure costs to benefiting properties in an equitable and consistent manner thereby enhancing the value of property by assigning a proportionate value of the improvements to the properties deriving benefit from the improvement. General Policy Statement: While the special assessment purposes, policies and procedures have been identified herein, the City Council may deviate from this policy when such rationale in equity arises or the law is required. I.Policy Definitions: A.Adjacent Property: A property directly adjacent to public improvements. Item 6i.3 Page 2 of 19 B. Access: Properties shall be considered to have access to public street improvements when they may enter onto the improvement from their own private driveway, private road, or public street, or when the street classification would allow the property to be granted driveway access. Properties shall be considered to have access to underground utility improvements when they directly abut the property or may be available to the property by utility or road easement/ROW, and the City has included the property within a defined services area approved for immediate utility service. C. Accrued Interest (or Compounded Interest): Interest which is calculated not only on the initial principal but also the accumulated interest of prior periods. D. Adjusted Area: An area of a benefited property that has been modified by an adjustment factor to more accurately represent the true benefit that property receives from an improvement in comparison to other properties in the assessment area. The adjustment will be based on the improvement design parameters that are applicable to that parcel, as approved by the City Council. Design parameters that may be used to determine the adjustment factor include, but are not limited to, trip generation, storm water runoff coefficients, water or sanitary sewer use, needed fire flow, and zoning or future land use. E. Assessed Cost: Those costs of public improvements that have been determined to benefit specific properties. The assessed cost will be equal to the project cost minus the City cost. Project costs eligible for assessment include all costs associated with the improvements, including, but not limited to, land acquisition, demolition, construction, administration, engineering, legal, financing and other costs as determined by the City Council. The financing charges include all costs of financing the project. These costs include, but are not limited to, financial consultant's fees, bond attorney's fees, and capitalized interest. F. Assessable Footage: The assessable footage is the total front footage of all of the benefiting properties, calculated by using the front footage method. ( G. Assessment Rate: The assessment rate for improvements other than streets is determined by dividing the assessable cost of an improvement by the total number of assessment units such as the total adjusted front footage or square footage, acreage, number of lots, or number of parcels. H. Assessment Unit: Front footage, area, or unit used to compute the costs on the basis of individual assessments. I. Benefit: The increase in property value as a result of a public improvement such as a street, sidewalk, trail, curb and gutter, water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, park, or street landscaping. Page 3 of 19 J. Deferment: A process of postponing the collection of the cost of public improvements and funding them as a system cost with the intention of collecting the cost at a later date. K. Driveway Approach: That area which lies between the existing pavement to the right- of- way line; curb cut to curb cut. For assessment purposes driveway approach refers to the road surfacing, not stormwater conveyance such as ditching or culverts. L. Front Footage: The distance measured along the right-of-way line that directly abuts an improvement, not counting Side-Lot Footage. M. Limited Access Street: A street, such as a major or minor collector street, which because of its high volume of traffic has been designated by the City for controlled access, meaning the number of access points to the street will be limited. N. Lot Definitions: 1. Corner Lot: A lot located at a street intersection having both front and side-lot footage. 2. Double Frontage Lot: A lot with access to two separate non- intersecting or intersecting streets but not a corner lot. 3. Irregularly Shaped Lot: Those lots abutting curved streets, cul-de- sacs, or other lots where there is more than five feet of difference in length between the front and back lot lines. 4. Rectangular Lot: A lot with less than five feet of difference in length between the front and back lot lines. O. Public Improvement: Improvements as allowed by State statute that provide a special benefit to properties, including but not limited to streets, sidewalks, trails, curb, gutter, sanitary sewer systems, storm sewer systems, water treatment and distribution systems. P. Special Assessment: A legal process whereby the benefited property is charged for all or a portion of the cost of public improvements. Q. Standards for Surface Improvements: Standards for surface improvements have been established in the City's Engineering Standards. R. Street: All public ways designed as means of access to the adjoining properties. Streets are classified into six groups and classified per a Collector or Local street status in the City's Comprehensive Plan: 1. Local Gravel – Local gravel streets have lower traffic counts as compared to collector gravel streets, have a gravel finish, and utilize rural ditches for stormwater conveyance. Examples include, but are Page 4 of 19 not limited to, Hidden Ponds Drive, Meadow Circle, Nystrom Lane, Rush Meadow Lane, and Treeline Drive. 2. Collector Gravel - Collector gravel streets have higher traffic counts as compared to local gravel streets, have a gravel finish, and utilize rural ditches for stormwater conveyance. Examples include, but are not limited to, Trail Haven Road, Cain Road, Bechtold Road, Old Settlers Road, and Willow Drive. 3. Rural Local Asphalt – Rural local asphalt streets have a bituminous finish and utilize ditches for stormwater conveyance. Examples include, but are not limited to, Cates Longhorn Road, Abilene Lane, Butterworth Lane, Hunter Road, and Dassel Lane. 4. Urban Local Asphalt – Urban local asphalt streets have a bituminous finish and utilize curb and gutter for stormwater conveyance. Examples include, but are not limited to, Bridle Path, Carriage Way, Prairie Sage Lane, and Sorrel Court. 5. Rural Collector Asphalt – Rural collector asphalt streets have higher traffic counts than local streets, have a bituminous finish, and utilize ditches for stormwater conveyance. Examples include, Oakdale Drive. 6. Urban Collector Asphalt – Urban collector asphalt streets have higher traffic counts than local streets, have a bituminous finish, and utilize curb and gutter for stormwater conveyance. Examples include, Gleason Parkway. S. Street Treatment Definitions: 1. Crack Seal and Seal Coat - Crack sealing involves patching and sealing cracks in the roadway. This is followed by seal coating, which involves spraying the road with oil and covering it with a layer of small rock. Crack sealing and seal coating is generally considered routine roadway maintenance. The recommended interval is 6-8 years with first application about 7 years after new roadway construction. 2. Mill and Overlay - Milling and overlaying consists of grinding off the upper layer of asphalt (in urban sections) and replacing it with a new layer of asphalt. This is generally done on roadways that have a fair amount of cracking and other surface distress, usually at about 60% of the street's life cycle. This is considered a structural improvement that will renew the street surface and extend its useful life. 3. Rehabilitate - Rehabilitating a roadway consists of grinding up the existing Page 5 of 19 asphalt and mixing it with a portion of the underlying gravel base (typically 4"- 8"). This combination of bituminous and gravel is then used as the new road base, and a new asphalt surface is paved over this. This is generally done on roadways that have a significant amount of distress. This can be a good alternative to reconstructing a road if the existing road base appears to be structurally sufficient. 4. Reconstruct - Reconstructing a roadway includes improving a gravel road to a paved road or completely removing the existing road and underlying gravel and sand base material, and constructing a new road section. This may also include correcting any poor base material beneath the section, or updating the road to meet design standards such as width and drainage. This is often done in conjunction with utility repairs/replacement. Generally done on roadways that exhibit signs of major distress, such as rutting, cracking, and potholes. T. System Cost: That portion of the assessable cost that benefits properties whose assessments are deferred because they qualify for green acres status, are located outside of the City limits, or are unable to make use of the improvements due to factors beyond their control. The City may reimburse itself for such system costs from the benefitting properties when the basis for the deferral is no longer valid. U. Unit: A unit, for purposes of defining an assessment, may include, but is not limited to: a household; a parcel/lot; water or sewer main length and size; sidewalk or trail length, width and depth; driveway approach length, width and depth. II. Policy Implementation and Procedures: A. Assessment Classification The assessment process shall address the feasibility of physical construction and also the affordability of the improvements. In meeting these responsibilities, a classification system is established below for public improvement projects based on the design capacity and the level of use. Cost apportionment is based on the extent of use of the improvement by the benefiting property owners and City policies for street paving, curb, gutter, and sidewalk construction shall be used as a basic guide. The classification system groups improvements into the three categories: • Type I improvements consist of projects that are mostly of benefit to the abutting properties and include local streets, curb, gutter, water and sewer services, and driveway improvements. Street construction, sidewalk, paving, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water mains may be Type I if solely designed to serve the abutting properties. • Type II improvements consist of projects that benefit a larger, yet definable, area. Street construction, sidewalk, paving, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water mains may also be Type II if the improvement benefits a larger area. Collector streets, which are likely to be used by a broader segment of the public, should be proportionately assessed to a larger area. Page 6 of 19 • Type III improvements consist of large-scale projects of benefit to the entire City regardless of location. The criteria for designation of any improvement as Type III are facilities that serve areas larger than a definable neighborhood or those areas separated by major identifiable barriers, such as creeks, or county roads. Typically, Type III improvements are financed through a combination of Federal and State appropriations and available City funds; however, special assessments may be needed to fully fund the project. If financial assistance is received by the City from the Federal Government, from the State of Minnesota, the County, or from any other source to defray a portion of the costs of a given improvement, such aid will be used first to reduce the "City cost" of the improvement. If the financial assistance received is greater than the normal "City cost", the remainder of the aid will be applied according to the terms of the assistance program or at the Council's discretion. The assessment classifications are listed in Table 1 below. The City Council may from time to time adjust the classification of improvements to maintain the equitability of the assessment cost. Table 1. Assessment Classification Type I Improvements Type II Improvements Type III Improvements Curb & Gutter Trunk Sanitary Sewers (greater than 8" diameter) Bridges Sidewalks and trails, 5 feet wide or less Trunk Water Main (greater than 8" diameter) and Looped Water Main Community Facilities Library Law Enforcement Fire Station Sanitary Sewer Laterals (less than or equal to 8" diameter) Collector Streets Water Main (less than or equal to 8" diameter) Sidewalks and trails, greater than 5 feet wide Community Parks Sewer & Water Services Storm Drainage Improvements Wastewater Treatment Facilities Local Streets/Alleys Pumping Stations Water Tower Storm Drainage Improvements Water Treatment Plant Other improvements mandated or authorized by law B. Methods of Assessment The City shall use the following methods in determining assessments for public improvements. Page 7 of 19 1. Front Footage Method This method computes the assessable frontage for the project and for each property. The assessment rate is obtained by dividing the total assessable cost by the assessable footage in an assessment district. The assessment for each parcel is then obtained by multiplying the assessment rate times the front footage for each property. Front footage is determined as follows: a. For rectangular lots, the front footage shall be the same as the front footage at the right-of-way. b. For irregularly shaped lots, the front footage will typically be calculated as the width of the lot as defined in the City's zoning ordinance, although other methods may be used at the City's discretion (such as average lot width) if they are determined to be more equitable. c. For all corner lots, street assessments, regardless of the orientation of the house, shall be based on one-half of the footage of the road being improved. d. For a rectangular corner lot, water and sewer assessments, regardless of the orientation of the house, the short side of the lot shall be considered to be the "frontage". e. Double frontage lots may be assessed for any street improvement that it has direct access to, if the lot is of such size that it could be split into multiple buildable lots. The front footage for each improvement will be determined in accordance with the above- described policies, whichever is appropriate. 2. Area Method This method computes cost on a square foot or acreage basis. The assessment rate is determined by dividing the total assessable cost by the total benefiting area. A parcel's assessment is then determined by multiplying the assessment rate times the benefiting area of the parcel. When the benefiting area includes both platted and un- platted properties, the gross benefiting area will be used to apportion the benefit among the properties. An adjustment factor reflecting land use may be applied to a parcel's benefiting area in some cases. For example, for storm sewer design, the assumed rate of runoff per acre from a commercial lot is greater than the runoff rate from a residential lot. If all uses are the same in a project area (single family, multi- family, commercial, or industrial), the assessment rate is the same for all. Where there is variation in residential density or uses, the assessment rate may be adjusted to reflect the corresponding differences in benefit. The assessable area shall include all properties legally eligible for assessments. The following items may not be included in area calculations: public right-of-ways, natural waterways, lakes or other wetlands. 3. Unit Method This method computes the costs on the basis of individual assessment units. For example, sewer and water services, sidewalks, trails, and driveway approaches are typically considered separate individual units. The total project cost is divided by the total number of assessment units to calculate the fixed cost. Assessment units could be determined on a per lot or per unit basis, or any combination thereof. For lots that may be further Page 8 of 19 subdivided, the City may determine the number of assessable units based on the number of equivalent lots that could be created from a particular parcel. 4. Combination Method This method involves using one or more of the above defined methods to more equitably calculate assessments. The combination method may be considered when there is varying land use, undeveloped properties available for future development, or other circumstances involving the defined public improvement that may provide assessment inequities. C. Determination of Assessable Costs, Rate and Term 1. Water System a. Water Mains: The assessable cost for installing new water main improvements shall be based on the level of service required by the property. In residential areas, 100% of the cost of installing water main that is 8-inches in diameter or less shall be assessed to the benefiting properties, and up to 50% for reconstruction, see chart below. In commercial areas, 100% of the cost of installing new water main and 50% of the cost of reconstruction will be assessed, based on current design standards. The cost of over sizing the water main for general distribution purposes shall not be assessed. Where larger diameter water mains are required to serve commercial, industrial or institutional properties, the increased cost of water main installation shall be assessed to those properties. Where improvements are designed to serve an area beyond that of direct benefit, the City may defer that portion of the assessment and fund it as a system cost. Reconstruction Assessments – Water System Years After First Assessment Levied1 City Share2 Assessed Share2 0-20 years 100% 0% 20-40 years 75% 25% Over 40 years 50% 50% 1First assessment refers to the original assessment for properties developed or platted at or before the time the improvement is constructed, or to the deferred assessment for properties developed or platted after the improvement is constructed. 2Percentage based on project construction cost. The assessed share of the project cost, as listed in the above table, will be apportioned against the benefiting properties. The City Engineer will use standard procedures to determine the benefiting property for each specific project. b. Water Services: The assessable cost for the construction or replacement of water services shall be 100% of the project cost. The unit cost method will be used to calculate the assessment. c. Length of Assessment: The assessment period for sanitary sewer improvements, including new construction and replacement projects, is a maximum of twenty years. Page 9 of 19 2. Sanitary Sewer Sanitary Sewer Assessments shall be based on engineering design standards. The assessable cost for installing sanitary sewer improvements shall be based on the type of service required by the property. In residential areas, 100% of the cost of installing new sanitary sewer that is 8-inches in diameter; and up to 50% for reconstruction, shall be assessed to the abutting properties. Where larger diameter sanitary sewers are required to serve commercial, industrial or institutional properties, the increased cost of installation shall be assessed to those properties. Where improvements are designed to serve an area beyond that of direct benefit, the City may defer that portion of the assessment and fund it as a system cost. a. Sanitary Sewer Assessment Formula: Assessments to be levied against properties within the benefited area shall be distributed to those properties on the basis of the following provisions: 1. Assessment Rate: The assessment rate shall be equal to the "assessable cost" of the improvement divided by the total number of assessable units benefited by the improvement. Projects having an uneven distribution of benefits may be subdivided into separate improvements using multiple assessment methods and rates to more equitably apportion the assessments. 2. Assessable Units: The assessable units shall be determined as follows: i. Lateral Sewers. The assessment method shall be the "unit method", unless otherwise specified by the Council. ii. Trunk Sewer and Lift Station. Trunk fees shall be charged as outlined in City Code, Chapter 51: Regulating Public Sanitary Sewer and Water Within the City of Corcoran. iii. Sewer Services. The assessable cost for the construction or replacement of sewer service lines shall be 100% of the project cost. The assessment shall be based on the number of sewer services installed for each individual property. This is the unit cost method of assessment. 3. Assessment Formula for Replacement: The following table shows the cost split for replacement of sanitary sewers (trunk sewers, lateral sewers, and lift stations), if they are to be assessed. Reconstruction Assessments – Sewer System Years After First Assessment Levied1 City Share2 Assessed Share2 0-20 years 100% 0% 20-40 years 75% 25% Over 40 years 50% 50% 1First assessment refers to the original assessment for properties developed or platted at or before the time the improvement is constructed, or to the deferred assessment for properties developed or platted after the improvement is constructed. Page 10 of 19 2Percentage based on project construction cost. The assessed share of the project cost, as listed in the above table, will be apportioned against the benefiting properties. The City Engineer will use standard procedures to determine the benefiting property for each specific project. 4. Length of Assessment: The assessment period for sanitary sewer improvements, including new construction and replacement projects, is a maximum of twenty years. 3. Storm Sewer Storm sewer improvements shall be classified to include all storm sewer, storm sewer pumping stations, culverts, ditches, rain gardens, swales, street grading and any other improvement, which will facilitate drainage. The assessment for the construction of storm drainage improvements shall be based on the level of service required by the property. a. Storm Sewer Assessment Formula: Assessments to be levied against properties within the benefited area shall be distributed to those properties on the basis of the following provisions: 1. Assessment Rate: The assessment rate shall be equal to the assessable cost of the improvement divided by the total number of assessable units benefited by the improvement. Projects having an uneven distribution of benefits may be subdivided into separate improvements using multiple assessment methods and rates to more equitably apportion the assessments. 2. Assessable Units: The assessable unit, unless otherwise specified by the Council, shall be the gross area or adjusted area of the benefited properties, both present and future, as determined in the project design. 3. Assessable Cost: The assessable cost shall be 100% of the total project cost for new or expanded storm drainage improvements, and up to 50% for reconstruction, based on the chart below. 4. Length of Assessment: The assessment period for sanitary sewer improvements, including new construction and replacement projects, is a maximum of twenty years. Reconstruction Assessments – Storm Sewer Years After First Assessment Levied1 City Share2 Assessed Share2 0-20 years 100% 0% 20-40 years 75% 25% Over 40 years 50% 50% 1First assessment refers to the original assessment for properties developed or platted at or before the time the improvement is constructed, or to the deferred assessment for properties developed or platted after the improvement is constructed. 2Percentage based on project construction cost. The assessed share of the project cost, as listed in the above table, will be apportioned against the benefiting properties. The City Engineer will use standard procedures to determine the benefiting property for each specific project. 5. Assessment Formula for Replacement: The cost split for replacement of storm Page 11 of 19 sewers, lift stations, and miscellaneous drainage improvements, if they are to be assessed, will be assessed in the same manner as sanitary sewer replacement as shown above. 6. Length of Assessment: The assessment period for storm sewers, lift stations, and miscellaneous drainage improvements is a maximum of twenty years. Where improvements are designed to serve an area beyond that of direct benefit, the City may defer that portion of the assessment and fund it as a system cost. 4. New Street Construction The City's general policy and practice is to require new residential street construction during land use development applications to be constructed to City standards by the developer/applicant with no special assessments or public bonding support. 5. Street Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Mill and Overlays a. Reconstruction and Rehabilitation - The assessable cost of street reconstruction and street rehabilitation projects shall be determined by the benefit to properties affected by the project determined through a letter of benefit or similar from a licensed appraiser. The assessment shall be 90 percent of the low value of the benefit. For example, if the benefit for a direct access residential property was valued from $12,000-$15,000 per unit, the assessment would be $10,800 ($12,000 x .9 = $10,800). If the benefit for an indirect access residential property was $3,000-$5,000 per unit, the assessment would be $2,700 $3,600 ( $3,000 x .9 = $2,700 ). The method of assessment shall be based on per unit. The remaining cost shall be a City cost. 1. For properties with access to the street receiving a reconstruction or rehabilitation, each existing unused development right and newly created development right resulting from the project will be assessed an amount equal to the assessment of a direct access property. 2. Landowners receiving assessments for existing unused development rights and newly created development rights may have the option of paying the entire assessment in one lump sum or through deferral until time of plat with no accrued interest during the period of deferral. Assessments will be filed with the County Recorder. b. Mill and Overlays - The assessable cost of overlays and mill and overlays shall be determined by the benefit to properties affected by the project determined through a letter of benefit or similar from a licensed appraiser. The assessment shall be 90 percent of the median value of the benefit. For example, if the benefit was valued from $1,500-$2,500 per unit, the assessment would be $1,800. The method of assessment shall be based on per unit. The remaining cost shall be a City cost. 1. Exception: The City has completing initial overlays on roads without assessments, the following roads will receive one overlay without an assessment in order to complete the existing program, if the road is improved to a higher standard instead of an overlay the exception no longer applies: Bluestem Road, Cain Road, Cates Longhorn Road, Chisolm Trail, Corcoran Trail East, Corcoran Trail West, Duffney Page 12 of 19 Drive, Hackamore Road (CR 101 – CR 116), Hage Drive, Heather lane, High Bluff Lane, Hunters Ridge, Jubert Lane, Julie Ann Drive, Kings Ben Road, , Maple Hill Road, Meadow Creek Drive, Meadowview Drive, Mohawk Drive, Oswald Farm Road, Pioneer Trail, , Rush Creek Drive, Schutte Court, Schutte Farm Road, Schutte Lane, Summerhill Lane, Sunnyhill Road, Sunset Lane, Trail Lane, and Windmill Drive. c. Length of Assessment - The assessment period for street improvements is a maximum of twenty years. 6. SIDEWALK The front footage or unit cost method shall be the basis for assessment. The assessable cost for sidewalk improvements shall be 100% for both new construction and reconstruction up to 5 feet wide. Sidewalk maintenance and rehabilitation shall be repaired or replaced to the original standard and is the responsibility of the abutting property owner. 7. DRIVEWAY APPROACHES Driveway approaches shall be part of the overall project and not assessed separately. The improvement to driveway approaches should be considered as the amount of benefit is established. D. Deferred Assessments for Green Acres In cases where improvement projects are determined to benefit properties that have been certified to qualify for Green Acres exemption, the City will determine that portion of the project cost that benefits those properties, and finance that portion of the project cost as a system cost. Landowners of benefiting properties may have the option of paying the entire assessment in one lump sum or through deferral as allowed by Minnesota Green Acres statutes. Once the benefiting properties no longer qualify for Green Acres status, the City may recover the system cost. Interest will not be accrued during the period of deferral if assessed on a Green Acres parcel which is not designated as homestead property. Assessments to landowners of Green Acres parcels which contain both homestead and non-homestead assessment units will accrue interest during the period of the deferral on the homestead assessment units only. Assessments against Green Acres parcels will be filed with the County Recorder. E. Deferred Assessments for Undeveloped Property In the Council’s discretion, the City may, at the meeting in which the Council approves an assessment, levy the assessment but defer the first installment of the assessment for unimproved property until a designated future year, or until the platting of the property or the construction of improvements. However, all deferred assessments must be paid within 30 years of the assessment levy. The City Council may set, by resolution, terms, conditions, standards, and criteria for the deferral and future payments. Assessments deferred pursuant to this section shall not accrue interest during the period of deferral. The City shall file a certificate with the county recorder stating the legal description of property subject to deferred Page 13 of 19 assessments, and the amount of the deferred assessments. The City shall include all benefitted property in the assessment proceedings, including those properties on which it determines to defer assessments. F. Determination of Assessment Rate and Terms 1. Interest Rate on Assessments: The City will charge interest on special assessments at a rate specified in the resolution approving the assessment roll. If bonds were sold to finance the improvement project, the interest rate shall generally be one percent (1.0%) more than the average rate of the bonds, rounded to the nearest quarter of a percent. If no bonds were sold, the interest rate shall be set using the same formula based on the current bond market. 2. Length of Assessment: The assessment period for all improvements is subject to the requirements of the bond market at the time of project financing and thus may vary in length from the time periods proposed. G. Undeveloped Property The City shall require the developer, owner or sub-divider of any property within the City's corporate limits desiring to install street, curb and gutter, sidewalk, sanitary sewer or water main improvements to follow the City's subdivision ordinance, in addition to the following: 1. Upon written request by a developer, the City Council shall give consideration to the preparation of a feasibility report to determine the feasibility of construction for the desired improvements. The developer will prepare a plan and other such information, as the Council requires, prior to the Council making a decision on the request. 2. The developer and/or the property owner are required to sign a Developer's Agreement and Petition and Waiver Agreement, in a form acceptable to the City, prior to awarding a contract. 3. At the completion of an improvement, all improvement costs will be recorded or certified to the County per the Developer's Agreement H. Petitioned Improvement Projects The City will consider petitioned improvement projects. However, the need for specific projects shall be determined based on engineering standards (e.g. the existing condition represents a physical or structural hazard, or is no longer cost-effective to maintain, etc.) as determined by the City Public Works Superintendent and City Engineer and approved by the City Council. The City may consider the following information in approving or denying the petition: comprehensive cost of the project; cost to individual properties; demonstrated need for the project; existing site conditions of the proposed project; geographic scope of the project area, and any other information the City deems relevant. The City Council has the authority to initiate non-petitioned improvement projects, if it is felt the improvements are in the best interest or safety of the citizens. Page 14 of 19 Special Assessment Procedures Purpose: This procedure is for internal purposes to summarize statutory and administrative requirements with respect to special assessments. Changes occur statutorily on an annual basis and administratively through Council direction and administrative review on an on-going basis. Verification of any changes needs to occur prior to utilizing this document as those changes may supersede the contents of this document at the time of approval. Procedure: I. Initiation of Proceedings Either a petition from affected property owners or the Council initiates Minnesota State Statute chapter 429 proceedings. A. By Petition: If the Council chooses to proceed with an improvement based on a petition it must have the signatures of the owners of at least 50 percent in frontage of the property bordering the proposed improvements. B. By Council: The Council may act on its own initiative in proposing a local improvement and ordering a feasibility report. The Council must calculate the cost of the improvement or direct staff to do so. II. Feasibility Report Whether initiated by petition or by Council, Chapter 429 requires that the city engineer, or another person with similar skills, prepare a feasibility report. The feasibility report must cover such factors as whether the project is necessary, the availability of money in the general fund to pay the city's share of the cost, an estimate of that cost, whether the improvement is cost effective, and any other information necessary for Council consideration. The feasibility report must also include the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Since a reasonable estimate of the total amount to be assessed and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels must be available at the hearing it could be part of the commissioned report. The feasibility report is integral to the assessment process. Best practice suggests that the City Council pass a resolution receiving the report and provide preliminary notice of the improvement. Ill. Initial Considerations The law requires two public hearings commonly known as an improvement hearing and an assessment hearing; in between these two public hearings Council may order the improvement, decide how to construct the project and tabulate an assessment roll. Page 15 of 19 A. Determining Benefit Districts: Determining what area benefits from improvement projects, or the area against which the City will levy assessments, is a major policy decision for the City Council. The benefit district varies with the kind of improvement. For some improvements, such as a water tank, the area benefited might be very large. In levying an assessment to finance the tank's construction the Council might assess the entire area the tank services. The special benefit test still applies. City staff, consulting engineers and attorneys may provide the basis for Council to determine what area or district to assess for a specific improvement because that area benefits from the improvement. B. City's Share: At any time before or after the City actually incurs expenses for the improvement, the Council must pass a resolution determining how much the City plans to pay and separate that from amounts to be assessed. Best practices suggest the Council work with an appraiser and an attorney to determine the appropriate City share of a particular project. The City has adopted a policy to address the methodology of the assessment calculations. C. Non-abutting Property: The Council may wish to levy assessments against adjacent, non- abutting properties if the properties benefit from the improvement. D. Service Laterals: City utility ordinance requires that property owners maintain private water and sewer service laterals. When an improvement project requires new service laterals the City may require that property owner to install or replace them. E. May Omit Improvement Hearing: The Council may omit the improvement hearing if 100 percent of the affected landowners sign the petition requesting the improvement. If the landowners are not paying 100% of the project costs the City will consider holding both public hearings. F. Two or More Simultaneous Local Improvements: When the City proposes undertaking two or more local improvements simultaneously the City does not need to issue separate notices and hold separate improvement hearings on different dates. The notice will describe each improvement separately, stating the estimated cost for each one and noting that there will be a hearing to address each improvement. IV. Prepare for the Improvement Hearing The purpose of the first hearing is for the Council to discuss a specific local improvement before ordering it done. The Council considers all the information in the feasibility report and any other information necessary for Council deliberation. A. Publish Notice of the Improvement Hearing: The City must publish notice of the initial public hearing on the proposed project twice in the official newspaper, stating the time and place of the hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the estimated cost, and the area proposed to be assessed. The notices must appear at least one week apart. At least three days must elapse between the last publication date and the date of the hearing. B. Mail Notice of the Improvement Hearing: The City must mail a notice once to each property owner in the proposed assessment area, at least 10 days prior to the improvement hearing that states the time and place of the hearing, the general nature of the Page 16 of 19 improvement, the estimated cost and the proposed assessment area. The notice must also contain a statement that a reasonable estimate of the cost of the assessment will be available at the hearing. The City will diligently make every effort to notify citizens about assessment proceedings. According to statute, failure to give mailed notice of the improvement hearing will not invalidate subsequent assessment proceedings. Notice to other governmental entities must be sent out at least two weeks before the improvement hearing, by registered or certified mail to the head of the instrumentality, department or agency having jurisdiction over the property. V. Improvement Hearing At the improvement hearing, interested persons may voice their concerns, whether or not they are in the proposed assessment area. A reasonable estimate of the total amount to be assessed and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels must be available at the hearing. If the Council rejects the project, it may not reconsider that same project unless another hearing is held following the required notice. The Council must prepare a record of the proceedings and make written findings. The Council may adjourn and subsequently continue the improvement hearing. To provide proper notice, before the improvement hearing is adjourned, the Council must state on record, the date, time and place of the continuation of the improvement hearing, if any. VI. Ordering the Improvement A resolution ordering the improvement may be adopted at any time within six months after the date of the improvement hearing. A. Vote Requirements for Ordering the Improvement: If the improvement is made pursuant to a legally sufficient petition from property owners, the Council adopts the resolution by a simple majority vote of all members of the Council. If there is not a petition, adoption requires a 'super-majority' vote, meaning the council can only adopt the resolution by a four-fifths vote of all members of the Council. B. Time Limits for Local Improvements: The resolution ordering the improvement may be adopted at any time within six months after the date of the improvement hearing. Either arrangements for day labor or a contract must be made within one year of adopting the resolution ordering the improvement, unless the Council specifically states a different timeframe in the resolution ordering the improvement. VII. Competitive Bidding The law permits the Council to carry out, in advance of the assessment hearing, all the steps prior to, but short of, actually issuing of a contract for the improvement. Thus, if the Council wishes to provide firm estimates of costs at the hearing, it may, in addition to the required preliminary report, prepare completed plans and specifications, advertise for bids, and open and tabulate them before the assessment hearing. Once the Council orders a public improvement, staff or consultants prepare the necessary plans and specifications and the Council either: • Contracts for all or part of the work to be performed by outside parties, or • Orders all or part of the work to be done by city staff and contracts for any Page 17 of 19 necessary materials and equipment. In either case, contracting law applies. The City Attorney should coordinate the contracting process in combination with the special assessment process. VIII. Prepare the Proposed Assessment Rolls The City Clerk, with the assistance of the engineer or other staff prepares the proposed assessment rolls. The proposed assessment cannot exceed the increase in market value accruing to the property as a result of the public improvement project. Road Assessment Calculations Components: A. Future Lots within the Combined Method Calculation: The maximum potential parcels are calculated with the current zoning. B. Cemeteries: A cemetery cannot be assessed in accordance with State Statute. C. Right of Way: Parcels that are entirely right of ways will not be assessed. D. Rounding: Calculation of assessment will need to be adjusted due to rounding. Practice is that $.01 per parcel will be adjusted either positively or negatively beginning with the last parcel listed. IX. Prepare for the Assessment Hearing The purpose of the second hearing is to give property owners an opportunity to express concerns about the actual special assessment. The Council will pass a resolution setting the date and time of the assessment hearing and direct the City Clerk to publish and mail notice about the assessment hearing. A. Publish Notice of the Assessment Hearing: At least once and at least two weeks before the assessment hearing, the City must publish notice of the hearing in the city newspaper. The published notice must include the hearing time, date, place, overall project description, area to be assessed, total cost of the improvement, a description of a landowner's right to appeal the assessment, and any deferment options, if available. B. Mail Notice of the Assessment Hearing: At least two weeks before the hearing the City must mail notice of the hearing to each affected property owner. This mailed notice must include the amount of the special assessment against the individual parcels, a description of the landowner's right to appeal the assessment, possible prepayment provisions, and the interest rate on the assessments. Failure to comply with the requirements for published and mailed notice invalidates the assessments. The Clerk will execute an affidavit attesting to the mailing to property owners. X. Assessment Hearing The assessment hearing may be adjourned and continued to another time. If the assessment hearing is adjourned, proper notice shall be given, stating for the record, the date, time and place of the continuation of the hearing. Page 18 of 19 A. Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll: At the assessment hearing the Council shall hear and consider all objections to the proposed assessment, whether presented orally or in writing. The Council may change or amend the proposed assessment as to any parcel. Council must by resolution adopt the special assessment against the lands named in the assessment roll. Once the assessment roll is adopted the assessments are set and become liens against the properties listed. The Council must prepare a record of the proceedings and written findings as to the amount of the assessment roll at this hearing. B. Council Decides Interest of Special Assessments: Special assessments may bear interest at any rate the Council determines. In setting the rate the Council should make sure there is a reasonable relationship between the assessment interest rate and the bond interest rate if the City is issuing bonds to finance the project. If the city finances the project with funds on hand without using bonds, the Council will want to look at the interest rate the City would otherwise have earned on the funds. C. Council Decides Payment Timelines: The Council must also decide the number of years over which the property owners may pay the assessment. The statutes permit payment over a period of not more than 30 years. XI. Sending of Final Notice The law does not require that the City send final notice of assessment to property owners if the amount assessed is the same as that listed in the previously mailed assessment hearing notice. The City chooses to notify property owners of all final assessment amounts whether they differ from the proposed assessment or not. Staff will also notify owners by mail the interest rates and prepayment requirements as stated in the proposed assessment notice. XII. Certification of Special Assessment Rolls The City Clerk must certify the assessment rolls to the County Auditor by November 30. The Assessment Rolls need to be accompanied by Council Resolution, certificate with the city seal signed by the City Clerk and a rate card. The County Auditor spreads the assessment every year for collection with taxes. XIII. Payment of Assessments and Interest Property owners initially have two options regarding their assessment. They can either pay the total amount of their assessment immediately, or pay the assessments in annual installments with interest under the terms set by the Council. The property owner can: • Pay the entire amount of the assessment within 30 days after the Council adopts the assessment rolls with no interest. • Pay the entire amount any time after 30 days, but before any certification has been made to the County Auditor with interest accrued to the date of payment. • Any time after the certification the property owner may still pay the entire remaining unpaid amount to the City. The property owner must pay the entire remaining unpaid amount of the assessment before November 15 of any year and must also pay all interest accrued until the end of that calendar year. Page 19 of 19 If the property owner elects not to pay the entire amount of the assessment at once, they may pay it in annual installments spread over the number of years the Council has allowed including interest calculated at the rate established by the Council. XIV. Deferred Assessments Deferred assessments are certified to the County Auditor but collection is deferred. All deferred assessments constitute liens on the property and must be paid within 30 years of the assessment levy. Property owners may request deferment provided the property owner or the property meets certain criteria. The City authorizes deferrals for undeveloped property and Green Acres deferrals. If the assessment deferral is for undeveloped property, or for a Green Acres assessment unit which is not designated as homestead property, no interest shall accrue during the period of the deferral. If interest is deferred with the assessment it will be computed on a compounding basis. Any interest on deferred assessments may be paid or deferred during the period of the deferral. A. Notice of Deferred Assessments: The City will record deferred special assessments with the County Auditor. The certificate of the deferred assessment will contain the type of deferral. B. Interest on Deferred Assessments: Property owners may pay interest (if applicable) either annually during the period of deferment, or when the assessment becomes payable. If interest is deferred with the assessment it will be computed on a compounded basis. { STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6j. Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Nalisha Williams, Assistant City Administrator Aaron Headrick, Communications Specialist Topic: Proposed Social Media Policy Action Required: Approval Summary: The City uses social media as a way to communicate and disseminate information to residents, visitors, and businesses. In order to establish a positive and informative social media presence, staff has researched and drafted the proposed social media policy. Council Action: Approve the proposed social media policy. Attachments: 1.Proposed Social Media Policy www.corcoranmn.gov 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Administrative Offices Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 Phone: 763-420-8966 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 City of Corcoran Social Media Policy I. Social Media Summary The City of Corcoran utilizes social media such as Facebook, X (formerly known as Twitter), and YouTube as a way to communicate and disseminate information to residents, visitors, and businesses of Corcoran. The city’s goal in using social media is to create more proactive engagement with the community while providing important and informative updates to individuals, families, organizations, and business owners both inside and outside the city. The City of Corcoran social media accounts are maintained and monitored by City staff. The City does not maintain control over the social media accounts of elected officials or City staff. The City welcomes public participation and comments on our social media pages, but it is important to note that these pages are not intended to be a public forum and posts/comments will be monitored by City staff. II. Regulations The City of Corcoran does not discriminate against views/opinions posted to our social media accounts, but City staff does reserve the right to remove or not approve specific comments that: • Contain vulgar language. • Are libel, slander, or personal attacks of any kind, including the use of offensive terms that target specific individuals or groups. • Promotes hate or discrimination of any kind. • Are abusive, vulgar, obscene, racist, threatening, harassing, intimidating, or other forms of bullying. • Advocate illegal, harmful, dangerous, or destructive activity, or violates local, state, or federal law. • Compromise the safety or security of the public or public systems. • Are unsupported accusations. • Infringe on copyrights or trademarks. • Are spam, including content that promotes products or services, or contains gratuitous links. • Are off topic. • Are duplicate posts. • Contain random or unintelligible text. • Are political campaigning or lobbying. • Contain viruses or computer code. • Contain images, videos, or links to sites that do not conform with any of the above guidelines. *Repeated violations of the above policy may cause the author/user to be permanently blocked from the City of Corcoran social media platforms. *The City of Corcoran is not responsible for settling disagreements with users on our social media platforms, nor will a comment be removed solely at the request of a user. *Comments that fall within the categories listed above will be deleted and preserved as a public record. www.corcoranmn.gov 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Administrative Offices Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 Phone: 763-420-8966 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 III. Important to Note The City of Corcoran does not endorse any product, service, company, or organization advertising on our social media platforms. Comments expressed on the City of Corcoran social media platforms do not necessarily reflect the opinions and position of the City or its elected officials and staff. The City of Corcoran makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of information provided on our social media platforms. However, external factors beyond the City’s control may affect the quality of information displayed. For that reason, the City cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on its social media platforms and is not liable for reliance on this information. Any information provided to the City is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. Questions concerning the operation of the City of Corcoran social media platforms should be directed to communications@corcoranmn.gov. IV. Connect With Us City of Corcoran: facebook.com/CorcoranMN Corcoran Polic Department: facebook.com/CorcoranPDMN City of Corcoran: @CorcoranMNCity City of Corcoran: @cityofcorcoranminnesota8200 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6k. Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Director Gottschalk Topic: Teamsters Memorandum of Agreement(s): Scheduling and HAS Contribution Action Required: Approval and Direction Summary: On April 25, 2024, the City Council approved a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with Teamsters Local 320 to resolve numerous scheduling grievances. The term of the MOA lasted through December of 2024. The MOA has been functioning as designed for both the union members and the City. Teamsters Local 320 has agreed to continue the MOA through the end of the current collective bargaining agreement in December of 2025. Staff recommends entering into the renewed Memorandum of Agreement regarding scheduling. The City’s high deductible health plan single coverage deductible increased from $3,200 per year to $3,300 for 2025. The City has historically contributed the amount of the single high deductible into an HSA account for each employee electing high deductible health plan coverage (single or family). In the 2025 budget the City continued this practice and increased the City’s Health Savings Account (HSA) contribution for city employees from $3,200 per year to $3,300 per year for employees enrolling in the City’s high deductible health plan. In order to provide the same benefit to employees in the collective bargaining unit a Memorandum of Agreement has been completed authorizing that change. The attached Memorandum of Agreement with Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees’ Union Local No. 320 increases the city’s Health Savings Account contribution from $3,200 per enrolled employee to $3,300 per enrolled employee for 2025. Financial/Budget: Renewal of the attached MOAs will result in an increased expenditure of $100 in Health Savings Account dollars per employee enrolled in the city health insurance plan – total dependent on the number of employees electing to enroll. Scheduling MOA is budget neutral. Electing to forego the MOAs would likely result in additional legal and operational costs. Options: 1.Approve the Memorandum of Agreement and direct the Mayor and City Administrator to enter the agreement. Council Action: 1.Approve the Memorandum of Agreement and direct the Mayor and City Administrator to enter the agreement. Attachments: 1. Scheduling Memorandum of Agreement 2.HSA Contribution Memorandum of Agreement Page 1 of 4 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT This Memorandum of Agreement is entered into between the City of Corcoran (hereafter “Employer”) and Teamsters Local No. 320 (hereafter “Union”) representing Police Officers (hereafter “Grievant”). WHEREAS, the Employer and the Union are parties to a collective bargaining agreement effective January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025; and WHEREAS, from March of 2023 to February of 2024, the Union has filed twelve (12) grievances related to the payment of overtime, ten (10) of which are outstanding (hereinafter “Overtime Grievances1 ”) and two (2) of which have been settled through separate Settlement Agreements ; and WHEREAS, the Employer and the Union wish to resolve the outstanding grievances to avoid the time and expense of any arbitration; and NOW, THEREFORE , the parties hereto have agreed as follows: 1.When Police Officers attend training or perform specialty duties 2 , the Department will attempt to schedule the training(s) or specialty duties during the Officer’s shift bid.3 2.When Police Officers are involved in or responsible for the scheduling of training or specialty duties, the Officer must make every effort to schedule the training or specialty duties during their shift bid. 3.Any time an Officer becomes aware of a need or a desire to attend training or a specialty duty assignment that would occur outside of the Officer’s shift bid, the Officer must notify the supervisor immediately so the supervisor can determine if overtime or Flex Time pursuant to the below is appropriate. 4.If a training or the performance of specialty duties occurs during an Officer’s shift bid, but the hours of work for that work day need to be modified to accommodate the training or performance of specialty duties, the Department will modify the work hours for that day. a.In the event the Department modifies work hours on a day during an Officer’s shift bid to accommodate a training/specialty duties, this modification of work hours does not qualify for overtime pay and is not grievable. 1 The reference to “Overtime Grievances” in this Agreement does not include the two grievances settled through separate Settlement Agreements (the Holiday Pay grievance and the Event Pay grievance). 2 The term “specialty duties” refers to any duties included in the list of specialty duties attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A. This list may be updated by the Department from to time to time at the Department’s discretion. 3 The term “shift bid” refers to the shift the Officer bids in approximately the fall of the prior calendar year. Agenda Attachment 6k1. Page 2 of 4 5.Upon ratification of this Agreement, the City will implement a 28 -day work period for Police Officers for purposes of determining overtime pay. a.Employees shall be eligible for overtime after 160 hours worked in a 28-day work period. b.Police Officers will continue to be entitled to overtime for hours worked in excess of their scheduled shift in accordance with Article 11.1 of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement. c.While the work period will be increased to 28 days for purposes of determining overtime, the payroll period will continue to occur bi-weekly. 6.When Police Officers attend a training or perform specialty duties for 8 (eight) hours or more on a day that is not on the Officer’s shift bid, the Officer will receive the same number of hours in straight time Flex Time that the Officer must use within the 28-day work period by taking off a different day for the same number of hours within the Officer’s shift bid. a.Officers are required to work with their supervisor(s) to identify a mutually agreeable date within the 28-day work period to use the Flex Time to take time off within their shift bid. b.The Department will make efforts to allow Officers to use the Flex Time on the Officer’s preferred day off within the 28 -day work period . i.Officers will not be permitted to select a day off within the 28 -day work period to use their Flex Time that would result in Department staffing falling below minimum staffing levels. c.When possible, Officers will inform their Supervisor in writing to identify the date they intend to use their Flex Time prior to attending the training or specialty duty. d.If the Officer does not identify a mutually agreeable date to use the Flex Time by day 14 of the 28-day work period , the Department will unilaterally assign the Officer the time off within the 28 -day work period . e.If the number of hours an Officer has in Flex Time is less than the number of hours in the shift that the Officer wants to take off within the 28 -day work period , the Officer can exchange an 8-hour shift with a 12-hour shift OR the Officer can use available PTO or accrued compensatory time to achieve a full day off. Page 3 of 4 i.For example, if an Officer attends an 8 -hour training on a day not during their shift bid, the Officer could do one of the following: •The Officer could choose another 8-hour shift on their shift bid during the 28-day work period to use the Flex Time to take time off in an hour-for-hour exchange of time off; OR •The Officer could choose a 12 -hour shift on their shift bid during the 28-day work period to use their Flex Time and instead work 4 hours of the 12-hour shift ; OR •The Officer could choose a 12 -hour shift on their shift bid during the 28-day work period to use their Flex Time and use 4 hours of PTO or comp time to take the full 12 -hour shift off. 7.When Police Officers attend a training or perform specialty duties for four (4) hours or more, but less than eight (8) hours on a day that is not on the Officer’s shift bid, the Officer will be allowed to complete other trainings or duties as assigned by their supervisor in order to work a full eight (8) or twelve (12) hour day if the work is available. a.The Officer will receive the same number of hours in Flex Time that the Officer must use within the 28-day work period by taking off a different day within the Officer’s shift bid as outlined in Paragraph 6 of this Agreement. 8.When Police Officers attend a training or perform specialty duties for less than four (4)hours on a day that is not on the Officer’s shift bid resulting in the Officer working overtime, the Officer is eligible to accrue compensatory time or receive overtime compensation in accordance with Articles 11.1 and 11.7 of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement. a.Police Officers may still elect to Flex this time off within the 28 -day work period in accordance with the process outlined in Paragraph 6 of this Agreement . 9.When Police Officers attend a training with a duration of one full week (defined as 40 hours or more on consecutive work days) or more, the Officer’s regular schedule will be a 40 - hour work week during the training period, regardless of whether the hours worked by the Officer during the training are consistent with the Officer’s shift bid. a.An Officer attending a training for one full week or more will not be entitled to additional Flex Time if the hours of the training do not align with the Officer’s shift bid. 10.Nothing in this Agreement is intended by the Employer to waive its right to schedule employees according to the business needs of the organization and the public safety needs of the City. Page 4 of 4 a.Even if an Officer has identified a mutually agreeable date to use Flex Time, the Department retains the right to schedule Officers for the hours required to meet Department needs. b.If the Department requires an Officer to work on a date that the Officer selected and was approved to use Flex Time, the Officer will receive overtime for the hours worked on that day. 11.The Union shall withdraw the ten (10) outstanding Overtime Grievances with prejudice. 12.This Memorandum of Agreement is based on the unique circumstances of the present matter and shall not constitute a precedent with regard to any future matter between the City and the Union. 13.Nothing in this Agreement is intended to be, nor will it be deemed to be, an admission of liability by the Employer that it has violated any contract, policy, state, federal or local statute or ordinance, administrative regulation or principle of common law, or that it has engaged in any wrongdoing whatsoever. 14.This Agreement shall be effective through December 31, 2025. If both parties mutually agree this MOA is workable, this Agreement can be continued . 15.This Memorandum of Agreement represents the compete agreement between the parties relative to this matter. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Settlement Agreement to be executed this ___ day of ___, 2024. FOR TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 320 FOR THE CITY OF CORCORAN Business Agent Josh Loahr City Administrator Jason R. Tobin Police Chief Matt Gottschalk Item #Special Duty Assigned to Officer Supervisor Office 1 Business Contacts Lawson Wilcox 2 Medical Equipment (AED)Lawson Ekenberg 3 Booking Room Burns Wilcox 4 Evidence Spellacy/Fadden Wilcox 5 Garage Maintenance Edstrom Ekenberg 6 Alcohol and Tobacco Compliance Olson/Burns Ekenberg 7 Vehicle Forfeiture Ekenberg 8 AWAIR & Employee Right-to-Know Edstrom Ekenberg 9 Predatory Offender Registration System Spellacy Wilcox 10 Speed signs Burns Ekenberg 11 Cell Phones Lawson Ekenberg 12 Child Safety Seats Andersen Wilcox 13 Canvas Ekenberg 14 Benchmark Ekenberg 15 Chaplian Coordinator Wilcox 16 Peer Support Burns Wilcox 17 Code Red Steelman Wilcox 18 Key Box Fadden Ekenberg 19 TEC - Fotokite Lawson Ekenberg 20 Fire extinguisher Edstrom 21 Social Media Ekenberg/Steelman 22 Leads Online Spellacy 23 TLO Spellacy 24 PBT Burns 25 Squad computers Lawson 26 Office maintenance Andersen 27 Watchguard Ekenberg 28 Code Enforcement/Trailer Park Warren/Edstrom 29 CO Alarms Lawson 30 Warrants Edstrom Vehicle 31 Message Trailer Burns 32 Squad Fleet Maintenance Warren/Andersen 33 Specialty Fleet Maintenance Warren 34 New Fleet Acquisition/set-up Ekenberg Groups 35 Embedded Social Worker Liason Wilcox 36 PT Officer Liaison Wilcox 37 Reserve Program Liaison Andersen 38 Traffic Safety Specialist / TZD - Lead Ekenberg 39 TZD Officers Several 40 Contractual Events Warren Ekenberg 41 School/Place of Worship Liasion Andersen 42 Alchohol/Tobacco Serving training Burns/Edstrom Ekenberg Training 43 Hearing and Fit test Edstrom 44 Field Training Sgt Ekenberg 45 Field Training Officer (FTO) Olson/Burns (needs training) 46 Defensive and Control Tacics Instructor Wilcox 47 Training Requests and Assignments Wilcox 48 Rangemaster Wilcox 49 Firearms Instructor Olson/Bohlsen/Wilcox 50 Rifle armor Wilcox 51 DNR Firearm Safety Lead Bohlson 52 DNR Firearm Saftey Instructor Olson/Ekenberg/Andersen 53 Taser instructor Burns/Wilcox 54 Less Leathal Olson/Burns 55 Firearm armorers Olson/Wilcox Events 56 Shop with a Cop Edstrom/Warren Wilcox 57 Toys for Tots Olson Wilcox 58 Night to Unite Andersen Ekenberg 59 Toy and Food Drive A.Burns Ekenberg 60 Truck Safety Lawson/Warren/Steelman Ekenberg 61 Event security liason Spellacy Wilcox Corcoran Police Department Special Duties Master List Exhibit A Agenda Attachment 6k2. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6m. Council Meeting December 12, 2024 Prepared By Deb Johnson Topic Solid Waste Hauler Renewals Action Required No action required. Council update only. Summary The City Council passed an ordinance regulating solid waste collection on October 14, 2021. The ordinance included requirements for licensing. As of the date of this meeting the solid waste haulers included below have submitted all the required documentation and fees to comply with Ordinance 2021- 436 Regulating Solid Waste Collection: Waste Management 490 Industrial Boulevard Winsted, MN 55395 Curbside Waste 4025 85th Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 Lightning Disposal 10730 Briggs Drive, Suite B Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 Republic Services 4351 US HWY 12 Delano, MN 55328 Financial/Budget The city receives a $75 license renewal fee from each solid waste hauler annually. All licenses renew January 1 and expire December 31 of each year. Council Action No Council action is required, and documents are provided for Council reference. Attachments 1. Ordinance 2021-436 Regulating Solid Waste Collection for reference only. Attachment Item:6m1. Memo To: City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE File: 227705990 Date: November 25, 2024 Subject: County Road 10 and Brockton Lane Turn Lane Improvements - Pay Request #2 & Final Council Action Requested We recommend approval of Pay Request #2 - Final to Omann Contracting Companies, Inc. in the amount of $93,161.97 on the County Road 10 and Brockton Lane Turn Lane Improvements Project. This project is the construction of turn lanes from County Road 10 into the Cook Lake Highlands development, which was a requirement of the development. Summary The turn lane improvements for the Cook Lake Highlands development have been completed with restoration completed and signage installed. This project was a requirement of the Cook Lake Highlands development with a cost share contribution from the City of Maple Grove and the Metropolitan Council due to the shared access for the adjacent development on 73rd Street and the Met Council lift station north of the development. Pay Application Summary •Contract Amount - $352,617.81 •Change Orders to Date - $0 •Total Complete to Date – $341,304.01 •Less Retainage - $0.00 •Amount Paid to date – $248,142.04 •Total This Pay Application – $93,161.97 Engineer’s Recommendation We recommend approving Pay Request #2 & Final to Omann Contracting Companies in the amount of $93,161.97. Financing This project would be funded through a developer escrow along with financial contributions from the City of Maple Grove and Met Council for the shared access. Attachments Pay Request #2 IC-134 documents Agenda Item 6m. 11/25/2024 LINE NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST 1 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 6,250.00$ 6,250.00$ 1 6,250.00$ 1.0 6,250.00$ 0.0 -$ 2 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL LS 1 1,806.00$ 1,806.00$ 1 1,806.00$ 1.0 1,806.00$ 0.0 -$ 3 REMOVE SIGN EACH 3 41.28$ 123.84$ 3 123.84$ 2.0 82.56$ 1.0 41.28$ 4 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN EACH 5 41.28$ 206.40$ 5 206.40$ 5.0 206.40$ 0.0 -$ 5 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 1251 1.00$ 1,251.00$ 1251 1,251.00$ 1,251.0 1,251.00$ 0.0 -$ 6 REMOVE STORM SEWER CULVERT LIN FT 86 15.00$ 1,290.00$ 86 1,290.00$ 86.0 1,290.00$ 0.0 -$ 7 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 20 15.65$ 313.00$ 177 2,770.05$ 20.0 313.00$ 157.0 2,457.05$ 8 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 860 9.50$ 8,170.00$ 935 8,882.50$ 860.0 8,170.00$ 75.0 712.50$ 9 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (EV) (P)CU YD 170 11.25$ 1,912.50$ 170 1,912.50$ 170.0 1,912.50$ 0.0 -$ 10 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (LV)CU YD 1180 13.50$ 15,930.00$ 787 10,624.50$ 0.0 -$ 787.0 10,624.50$ 11 GRANULAR BORROW TON 130 24.50$ 3,185.00$ 17.88 438.06$ 0.0 -$ 17.9 438.06$ 12 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW, MOD 8%TON 390 24.50$ 9,555.00$ 234.72 5,750.64$ 0.0 -$ 234.7 5,750.64$ 13 STABILIZING AGGREGATE, 3" MINUS TON 150 40.00$ 6,000.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 14 STRIP, STOCKPILE, AND RESPREAD TOPSOIL LS 1 14,750.00$ 14,750.00$ 1 14,750.00$ 1.0 14,750.00$ 0.0 -$ 15 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 5, NON-WOVEN (P)SQ YD 2394 2.70$ 6,463.80$ 2394 6,463.80$ 2,394.0 6,463.80$ 0.0 -$ 16 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2, 100 % CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 100 67.00$ 6,700.00$ 64.6 4,328.20$ 0.0 -$ 64.6 4,328.20$ 17 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 15 135.00$ 2,025.00$ 5 675.00$ 5.0 675.00$ 0.0 -$ 18 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 15 100.00$ 1,500.00$ 6 600.00$ 0.0 -$ 6.0 600.00$ 19 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED TON 1460 26.50$ 38,690.00$ 872.76 23,128.14$ 0.0 -$ 872.8 23,128.14$ 20 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")SQ YD 600 6.00$ 3,600.00$ 600 3,600.00$ 600.0 3,600.00$ 0.0 -$ 21 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 150 4.50$ 675.00$ 185 832.50$ 15.0 67.50$ 170.0 765.00$ 22 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON 20 140.50$ 2,810.00$ 25.48 3,579.94$ 25.5 3,579.94$ 0.0 -$ 23 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B)TON 50 133.25$ 6,662.50$ 50 6,662.50$ 50.0 6,662.50$ 0.0 -$ 24 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 437 114.75$ 50,145.75$ 520.17 59,689.51$ 520.17 59,689.51$ 0.0 -$ 25 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 440 104.25$ 45,870.00$ 528 55,044.00$ 422.7 44,064.39$ 105.3 10,979.61$ 26 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (EV)CU YD 110 25.00$ 2,750.00$ 65 1,625.00$ 0.0 -$ 65.0 1,625.00$ 27 ADJUST EXISTING CASTING EACH 1 740.00$ 740.00$ 2 1,480.00$ 1.0 740.00$ 1.0 740.00$ 28 4" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LIN FT 235 29.65$ 6,967.75$ 280 8,302.00$ 215.0 6,374.75$ 65.0 1,927.25$ 29 CLEANOUT W/ THREADED CAP EACH 2 350.00$ 700.00$ 2 700.00$ 2.0 700.00$ 0.0 -$ 30 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ FT 810 8.16$ 6,609.60$ 810 6,609.60$ 770.0 6,283.20$ 40.0 326.40$ 31 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 300 36.12$ 10,836.00$ 497 17,951.64$ 497.0 17,951.64$ 0.0 -$ 32 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 40 154.80$ 6,192.00$ 24 3,715.20$ 24.0 3,715.20$ 0.0 -$ 33 INSTALL RETAINING WALL LIN FT 30 153.30$ 4,599.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 34 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1 5,000.00$ 1.0 5,000.00$ 0.0 -$ 35 INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH 5 361.20$ 1,806.00$ 6 2,167.20$ 4.0 1,444.80$ 2.0 722.40$ 36 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 29 59.86$ 1,735.94$ 29 1,735.94$ 22.0 1,316.92$ 7.0 419.02$ 37 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT - MAINTAINED LS 1 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ 38 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 9 400.00$ 3,600.00$ 4 1,600.00$ 2.0 800.00$ 2.0 800.00$ 39 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 1410 2.32$ 3,271.20$ 1370 3,178.40$ 1,233.0 2,860.56$ 137.0 317.84$ Pay Request #2 County Road 10 and Brockton Lane Turn Lane Improvements Project Number: 227705990 10/11/2024 City of Corcoran COMPLETED TO DATE PAY REQUEST #2 & FINAL SEPTEMBER 2024 BASE BID: Less Previous Payments 40 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAW - MAINTAINED LIN FT 150 4.13$ 619.50$ 150 619.50$ 0.0 -$ 150.0 619.50$ 41 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25 SQ YD 2550 2.06$ 5,253.00$ 2550.0 5,253.00$ 2,271.7 4,679.63$ 278.3 573.37$ 42 HYDROMULCH MnDOT SEED MIXTURE 25-131 SQ YD 230 2.58$ 593.40$ 230 593.40$ 125.3 323.36$ 104.7 270.04$ 43 MnDOT SEED MIXTURE 25-141 SQ YD 2550 0.19$ 484.50$ 2550.0 484.50$ 2,271.7 431.62$ 278.3 52.88$ 44 4" SOLID LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 755 0.72$ 543.60$ 832 599.04$ 832.0 599.04$ 0.0 -$ 45 6" SOLID LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 1178 1.08$ 1,272.24$ 1383 1,493.64$ 1,115.0 1,204.20$ 268.0 289.44$ 46 24" SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 55 15.40$ 847.00$ 49 754.60$ 38.0 585.20$ 11.0 169.40$ 47 4" DOTTED LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 344 0.72$ 247.68$ 199 143.42$ 199.2 143.42$ 0.0 -$ 48 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 700 1.44$ 1,008.00$ 1214 1,748.16$ 1,177.0 1,694.88$ 37.0 53.28$ 49 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (WHITE) (LT ARROW) PREF THERM GR IN EACH 2 448.92$ 897.84$ 4 1,795.68$ 2.0 897.84$ 2.0 897.84$ 50 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (WHITE) (RT ARROW) PREF THERM GR IN EACH 2 448.92$ 897.84$ 2 897.84$ 2.0 897.84$ 0.0 -$ TOTAL BASE BID:305,856.88$ 289,106.84$ 219,478.20$ 69,628.64$ Alternate #1 QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST A1 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 500.00$ 500.00$ 1 500.00$ 1.0 500.00$ 0.00 -$ A2 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 40 4.50$ 180.00$ 40 180.00$ 0.0 -$ 40.00 180.00$ A3 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 70 133.25$ 9,327.50$ 28.59 3,809.62$ 0.0 -$ 28.59 3,809.62$ A4 ADJUST VALVE BOX-WATER EACH 2 395.00$ 790.00$ 2 790.00$ 2.0 790.00$ 0.00 -$ A5 ADJUST EXISTING CASTING EACH 2 450.00$ 900.00$ 2 900.00$ 2.0 900.00$ 0.00 -$ A6 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 500.00$ 500.00$ 1 500.00$ 1.0 500.00$ 0.00 -$ TOTAL ALTERNATE #1:12,197.50$ 6,679.62$ 2,690.00$ 3,989.62$ Alternate #2 QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST B1 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1 1,000.00$ 1.0 1,000.00$ 0.00 -$ B2 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (LV)CU YD 90 30.00$ 2,700.00$ 90 2,700.00$ 0.0 -$ 90.00 2,700.00$ B3 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED TON 103 30.00$ 3,090.00$ 103 3,090.00$ 0.0 -$ 103.00 3,090.00$ B4 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON 26 140.50$ 3,653.00$ 26 3,653.00$ 26.0 3,653.00$ 0.00 -$ B5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B)TON 5 250.00$ 1,250.00$ 58.38 14,595.00$ 58.4 14,595.00$ 0.00 -$ B6 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 5 250.00$ 1,250.00$ 5 1,250.00$ 5.0 1,250.00$ 0.00 -$ B7 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ FT 1283 8.16$ 10,469.28$ 990 8,078.40$ 905.0 7,384.80$ 85.00 693.60$ B8 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 62 154.80$ 9,597.60$ 62 9,597.60$ 62.0 9,597.60$ 0.00 -$ B9 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 2 400.00$ 800.00$ 2 800.00$ 2.0 800.00$ 0.00 -$ B10 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 290 2.32$ 672.80$ 290 672.80$ 290.0 672.80$ 0.00 -$ B11 HYDROMULCH MnDOT SEED MIXTURE 25-131 SQ YD 425 0.19$ 80.75$ 425 80.75$ 425.0 80.75$ 0.00 -$ TOTAL ALTERNATE #1:34,563.43$ 45,517.55$ 39,033.95$ 6,483.60$ TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACT:352,617.81$ 341,304.01$ -$ 261,202.15$ -$ 80,101.86$ ORIGINAL CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT 352,617.81$ 341,304.01$ 261,202.15$ 80,101.86$ Change Order #1 3,487.75$ -$ 13,060.11$ -$ Total Revised Contract Amount 356,105.56$ 341,304.01$ 248,142.04$ 80,101.86$ SUBTOTAL CURRENT RETAINAGE (5%) TOTAL CURRENT PAY REQUEST COMPLETE TO DATE PAY REQUEST #2 & FINAL CONTRACT SUMMARY LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS Memo To:Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From:Daryl Kirschenman, PE Steve Hegland, PE File:227705274 Date:December 2, 2024 Reference: Change Order No. 2 – Corcoran Water Tower Council Action Requested Staff is recommending City Council to review and approve Change Order No. 2 for the Corcoran Water Tower Project. This change order will adjust the completion dates of the contract with no cost adjustments. Change Order #2 The final completion date in the contract for the Water Tower as part of the NE water system is December 1st, 2024. The contractor has completed the majority of the work on the water tower including the erection of the structure, internal plumbing and the necessary welding and painting to make it operational. However, due to the timing of the utility construction project, the water connection to the tower has not been completed and the testing of the tower and piping has not been able to be completed. The site work (concrete curbing, paving and landscaping) has also not been completed as the contractor wanted to ensure the water piping underground is adequately tested as well. The watermain portion of the utility project is anticipated to be completed in mid-December with the watermain being tested yet in December to make the water available to the tower for testing in early 2025. The water tower would then be filled and tested but would be drained and not brought online until the water treatment plant is operational. Because the controls for the tower are being supplied and installed with the water treatment plant, we want to make sure the complete system is operational first to avoid the potential for ice accumulation. The site work and landscaping will be completed in the spring of 2025. The WTP is set for substantial completion on April 30th, 2025, and final completion on June 30th, 2025. Attached to this memo is Change Order No. 2 for the Corcoran Water Tower Project. This is being processed to formally extend the project timeline due to the completion dates of the WTP and watermain projects. Engineer’s Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council review and approve of the attached Change Order No. 2. Agenda Item 6n. EJCDC® C-941, Change Order EJCDC® C-941, Change Order, Rev.1. Copyright© 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 2 CONFORMED CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 Owner:City of Corcoran, Minnesota Owner’s Project No.: Engineer: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Engineer’s Project No.:227705274 Contractor: Phoenix Fabricators & Erectors, LLC Contractor’s Project No.: Project:1.0 MG Water Tower Contract Name:Corcoran 1.0 MG Water Tower Date Issued: December 2, 2024 Effective Date of Change Order: December 2, 2024 The Contract is modified as follows upon execution of this Change Order: Description: Extend the project timeline due to the completion dates of the WTP and watermain projects connecting the tower to the system. The watermain and tower piping needs disinfection prior to operation. Installation of the tank mixer, electrical equipment for operations, disinfection, testing and civil site work (curb & gutter, pavement). Attachments: Change Order No. 2 Memo Change in Contract Price Change in Contract Time Original Contract Price:Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion: October 1, 2024 $4,703,386.00 Ready for final payment: December 1, 2024 [Decrease] Previously approved Change Orders:[Increase] [Decrease] from previously approved Change Orders No.1 to No. [Number of previous Change Order]: Substantial Completion: No Change $18,716.92 Ready for final payment: No Change Contract Price prior to this Change Order:Contract Times prior to this Change Order: Substantial Completion: October 1, 2024 $4,684,669.08 Ready for final payment: December 1, 2024 [Increase][Decrease] this Change Order:[Increase] this Change Order: Substantial Completion:211 Days $0.00 Ready for final payment:211 Days EJCDC® C-941, Change Order EJCDC® C-941, Change Order, Rev.1. Copyright© 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 2 CONFORMED Contract Price incorporating this Change Order:Contract Times with all approved Change Orders: Substantial Completion: April 30, 2025 $4,684,669.08 Ready for final payment: June 30, 2025 Recommended by Engineer (if required)Accepted by Contractor By: Title: Date: Authorized by Owner Approved by Funding Agency (if applicable) By: Title: Date: Project Engineer 12/3/2024 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Steve Hegland, PE Nick Wyers, PE Project/File: 227705275 Date: December 2, 2024 Subject: Pay Request #4 to S.R. Weidema – NE Cororan Trunk Infrastructure Council Action Requested Staff is recommending the City Council Approve Pay Application #4 for the NE Corcoran Trunk Infrastructure project to S.R. Weidema in the amount of $423,985.36. Summary The contractor S.R. Weidema has completed the installation of all the sanitary sewer on the project and has also completed installation of watermain and raw watermain along the portion of the project west of County Road 116. They are beginning to install the watermain along the eastern portion of the project and are currently installing domestic watermain between the treatment plant Bellwether development. The signed payment request form and pay application is attached for review. Below is a summary of the work completed to date: Total Contract Value to Date $3,501,569.99 Work Completed to Date $2,928,211.87 5% Retainage $146,410.59 Amount Paid to Date $2,357,815.92 Total Pay App #4 $423,985.36 Engineer’s Recommendation We recommend approving Pay Request #4 to S.R. Weidema in the amount of $423,985.36. Agenda Item 6o. LINE NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $170,000.00 170,000.00$ 1 170,000.00$ 1.00 170,000.00$ 0.00 -$ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $30,000.00 30,000.00$ 1 30,000.00$ 1.00 30,000.00$ 0.00 -$ 3 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 30 $8.00 240.00$ 18 144.00$ 0.00 -$ 18.00 144.00$ 4 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 250 $4.00 1,000.00$ 90 360.00$ 0.00 -$ 90.00 360.00$ 5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 1480 $6.50 9,620.00$ 1340 8,710.00$ 1,250.00 8,125.00$ 90.00 585.00$ 6 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 4 $710.00 2,840.00$ 3 2,130.00$ 3.00 2,130.00$ 0.00 -$ 7 REMOVE STORM SEWER FLARED END SECTION EACH 2 $402.00 804.00$ 2 804.00$ 1.00 402.00$ 1.00 402.00$ 8 REMOVE STORM PIPE LIN FT 413 $17.00 7,021.00$ 234 3,978.00$ 199.00 3,383.00$ 35.00 595.00$ 9 REMOVE FENCE LIN FT 67 $9.00 603.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 10 SALVAGE & RESPREAD EXISTING TOPSPOL (MIN. 1FT)LUMP SUM 1 $6,000.00 6,000.00$ 1 6,000.00$ 0.50 3,000.00$ 0.50 3,000.00$ 11 SALVAGE & RESPREAD EXISTING WETLAND SOILS (AS REQUIRED BY PERMIT) LUMP SUM 1 $20,000.00 20,000.00$ 0.5 10,000.00$ 0.00 -$ 0.50 10,000.00$ 12 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (EV) (P) CU YD 2370 $13.00 30,810.00$ 84 1,092.00$ 0.00 -$ 84.00 1,092.00$ 13 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HR 35 $175.00 6,125.00$ 8 1,400.00$ 0.00 -$ 8.00 1,400.00$ 14 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 20 $100.00 2,000.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 15 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE 5 NON-WOVEN SQ YD 4290 $2.15 9,223.50$ 2481 5,334.15$ 2,481.00 5,334.15$ 0.00 -$ 16 STABILIZING AGGREGATE, 3" MINUS TON 430 $36.30 15,609.00$ 52.5 1,905.75$ 52.50 1,905.75$ 0.00 -$ 17 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 100% CRUSHED TON 1670.00 $20.00 33,400.00$ 1320.09 26,401.80$ 1,320.09 26,401.80$ 0.00 -$ 18 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2, 100% CRUSHED TON 200 $39.55 7,910.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 19 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 80 $5.35 428.00$ 5 26.75$ 5.00 26.75$ 0.00 -$ 20 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 140 $123.00 17,220.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 21 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 180 $114.00 20,520.00$ 94 10,716.00$ 94.00 10,716.00$ 0.00 -$ 22 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 30 $150.00 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 23 12" HDPE STORM SEWER- TEMPORARY LIN FT 228 $32.00 7,296.00$ 69 2,208.00$ 69.00 2,208.00$ 0.00 -$ 24 18" HDPE STORM SEWER LIN FT 169 $41.00 6,929.00$ 100 4,100.00$ 100.00 4,100.00$ 0.00 -$ 25 18" METAL FLARED END SECTION EACH 1 $455.00 455.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 26 12" RC PIPE STORM SEWER CLASS V LIN FT 71 $62.00 4,402.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 27 18" RC PIPE STORM SEWER CLASS V LIN FT 43 $72.00 3,096.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 28 18" RC FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $1,890.00 1,890.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 29 CONSTRUCT 4' DIAMETER PRECAST STORM STRUCTURE EACH 2 $4,048.00 8,096.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 30 CONSTRUCT 2' x 3' CATCH BASIN EACH 2 $2,729.00 5,458.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 31 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE EACH 1 $1,300.00 1,300.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 32 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 2 $1,800.00 3,600.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 33 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE EACH 1 $3,700.00 3,700.00$ 1 3,700.00$ 1.00 3,700.00$ 0.00 -$ 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 2 $5,500.00 11,000.00$ 2 11,000.00$ 1.00 5,500.00$ 1.00 5,500.00$ 35 6' DIA SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 6 $12,910.00 77,460.00$ 6 77,460.00$ 4.00 51,640.00$ 2.00 25,820.00$ 36 6' DIA SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE - DROP STRUCTURE EACH 1 $57,177.00 57,177.00$ 1 57,177.00$ 1.00 57,177.00$ 0.00 -$ 37 6' DIA SANITARY STRUCTURE OVERDEPTH (>12' DEPTH)LIN FT 131 $606.00 79,386.00$ 131 79,386.00$ 113.66 68,877.96$ 17.34 10,508.04$ 38 PIPE JACKING 42" STEEL CASING LIN FT 115 $2,930.00 336,950.00$ 115 336,950.00$ 115.00 336,950.00$ 0.00 -$ 39 8" DIP SANITARY SEWER W/ LINER LIN FT 92 $208.00 19,136.00$ 54 11,232.00$ 54.00 11,232.00$ 0.00 -$ 40 30" PVC PS-115 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 1142 $325.00 371,150.00$ 1142 371,150.00$ 291.00 94,575.00$ 851.00 276,575.00$ 41 30" PVC C-900 DR-18 SANITARY SEWER PIPE (25'-30' DEPTH)LIN FT 151 $800.00 120,800.00$ 151 120,800.00$ 151.00 120,800.00$ 0.00 -$ 42 30" PVC C-900 DR-18 SANITARY SEWER PIPE (30'-35' DEPTH)LIN FT 150 $800.00 120,000.00$ 150 120,000.00$ 150.00 120,000.00$ 0.00 -$ 43 30" PVC C-900 DR-18 SANITARY SEWER PIPE (35'-40' DEPTH)LIN FT 130 $800.00 104,000.00$ 130 104,000.00$ 130.00 104,000.00$ 0.00 -$ 44 30" PVC C-900 DR-18 SANITARY SEWER PIPE (40'-45' DEPTH)LIN FT 580 $800.00 464,000.00$ 599 479,200.00$ 599.00 479,200.00$ 0.00 -$ 45 8" PVC PLUG EACH 2 $268.00 536.00$ 2 536.00$ 2.00 536.00$ 0.00 -$ 46 30" PVC PLUG EACH 1 $3,290.00 3,290.00$ 1 3,290.00$ 1.00 3,290.00$ 0.00 -$ 47 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EACH 7 $1,600.00 11,200.00$ 5 8,000.00$ 3.00 4,800.00$ 2.00 3,200.00$ 48 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX (OWNER SUPPLIED)EACH 5 $1,594.00 7,970.00$ 3 4,782.00$ 2.00 3,188.00$ 1.00 1,594.00$ 49 20" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX (OWNER SUPPLIED)EACH 4 $2,156.00 8,624.00$ 4 8,624.00$ 2.00 4,312.00$ 2.00 4,312.00$ 50 INSTALL HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE EACH 4 $8,953.00 35,812.00$ 3 26,859.00$ 1.00 8,953.00$ 2.00 17,906.00$ 51 6" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN LIN FT 26 $62.00 1,612.00$ 29 1,798.00$ 15.00 930.00$ 14.00 868.00$ 52 8" PVC C-900 DR-18 WATERMAIN OPEN CUT LIN FT 60 $62.00 3,720.00$ 60 3,720.00$ 60.00 3,720.00$ 0.00 -$ 53 16" PVC C-900 DR-18 WATERMAIN OPEN CUT LIN FT 3050 $95.00 289,750.00$ 881 83,695.00$ 661.00 62,795.00$ 220.00 20,900.00$ 54 20" PVC C-900 DR-18 WATERMAIN OPEN CUT LIN FT 1200 $155.00 186,000.00$ 1200 186,000.00$ 986.00 152,830.00$ 214.00 33,170.00$ 55 16" PVC C-900 DR-18 WATERMAIN TRENCHLESS INSTALLATION LIN FT 90 $385.00 34,650.00$ 95 36,575.00$ 95.00 36,575.00$ 0.00 -$ 56 20" PVC C-900 DR-18 WATERMAIN TRENCHLESS INSTALLATION LIN FT 1150 $320.00 368,000.00$ 1118 357,760.00$ 1,118.00 357,760.00$ 0.00 -$ 57 16" PLUG WITH BLOWOFF VALVE EACH 1 $3,122.00 3,122.00$ 1 3,122.00$ 1.00 3,122.00$ 0.00 -$ 2800 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND 20540 $7.85 161,239.00$ 7868 61,763.80$ 4,628.00 36,329.80$ 3,240.00 25,434.00$ 59 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION - 24" THICK LIN FT 1389 $0.01 13.89$ 1142 11.42$ 168.00 1.68$ 974.00 9.74$ PAY REQUEST #4 December 2024COMPLETED TO DATE Pay Request #4 NE Corcoran Trunk Infrastructure Project Number: 227705275 12/2/2024 City of Corcoran BASE BID: Less Previous Payments 60 INSTALL STRUCTURE SIGN POST AND MARKER EACH 12 $190.00 2,280.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 61 ANTI-SEEPAGE COLLAR EACH 6 $2,000.00 12,000.00$ 2 4,000.00$ 1.00 2,000.00$ 1.00 2,000.00$ 62 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III (GRANITE)TON 20 $105.00 2,100.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 63 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - MAINTAINED LUMP SUM 1 $7,200.00 7,200.00$ 0.8 5,760.00$ 0.80 5,760.00$ 0.00 -$ 64 MNDOT SEED MIXTURE 25-151 & HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZER ACRE 0.2 $9,878.00 1,975.60$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 65 MNDOT SEED MIXTURE - 25-131 & STRAW MULCH ACRE 4.7 $6,174.00 29,017.80$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 66 MNDOT SEED MIXTURE - 35-621 & STRAW MULCH ACRE 1.8 $7,373.00 13,271.40$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 67 MNDOT SEED MIXTURE - 34-271 & STRAW MULCH ACRE 1.4 $7,500.00 10,500.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 68 BALE BARRIERS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 3302 $3.35 11,061.70$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 69 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 3400 $2.20 7,480.00$ 1703 3,746.60$ 1,703.00 3,746.60$ 0.00 -$ 70 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG - MAINTAINED LIN FT 821 $2.90 2,380.90$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 71 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 9 $462.80 4,165.20$ 7 3,239.60$ 5.00 2,314.00$ 2.00 925.60$ 72 CULVERT PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 3 $350.00 1,050.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 73 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25 SQ YD 500 $2.30 1,150.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ 74 REMOVE TEMPORARY ACCESS LUMP SUM 1 $18,000.00 18,000.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ TOTAL BASE BID: 3,442,325.99$ 2,860,647.87$ 2,414,347.49$ 446,300.38$ TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACT: 3,442,325.99$ LINE NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST CO1.1 30" PVC C-900 DR-18 SANITARY SEWER PIPE (40'-45' DEPTH)LIN FT 40 $800.00 32,000.00$ 40 32,000.00$ 40.00 32,000.00$ 0.00 -$ CO1.2 8" SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 80 $365.00 29,200.00$ 80 29,200.00$ 80.00 29,200.00$ 0.00 -$ CO1.3 8" DIP SANITARY SEWER W/ LINER LIN FT -40 $208.00 (8,320.00)$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.00 -$ CO1.4 MODIFY SANITARY MANHOLE 16 LUMP SUM 1 $1,550.00 1,550.00$ 1 1,550.00$ 1.00 1,550.00$ 0.00 -$ CO1.5 REMOVE EXISTING 30" C900 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LUMP SUM 1 $4,814.00 4,814.00$ 1 4,814.00$ 1.00 4,814.00$ 0.00 -$ TOTAL CHANGE ORDER #1: 59,244.00$ 67,564.00$ 67,564.00$ -$ TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT: 3,501,569.99$ 2,928,211.87$ 2,481,911.49$ 446,300.38$ ORIGINAL CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT 3,442,325.99$ 2,928,211.87$ 2,481,911.49$ 446,300.38$ TOTAL CHANGE ORDER:59,244.00$ 146,410.59$ 124,095.57$ 22,315.02$ TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT:3,501,569.99$ 2,781,801.28$ 2,357,815.92$ 423,985.36$ PAY REQUEST #4 December 2024 PAY REQUEST #4 SUBTOTAL CURRENT RETAINAGE (5%) TOTAL CURRENT PAY REQUEST COMPLETED TO DATE LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS CONTRACT SUMMARY CHANGE ORDER #1 Less Previous PaymentsCOMPLETED TO DATE SECTION 00 62 76 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT FORM OWNER: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: 4 Original Contract Amount: Contract Changes approved to Date :CO#1 Revised Contract Price : Work Completed to Date (attached): Retainage to Date, 5%: Work Completed to Date Less Retainage to Date: Total Amount Previously Certified: Payment Request This Estimate: CONTRACTOR Application for Payment Form Project No. 227705275 00 62 76-1 PAY ESTIMATE NO. I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid. 3,442,325.99$ 59,244.00$ 3,501,569.99$ 2,928,211.87$ 2,357,815.92$ 423,985.36$ City of Corcoran S.R. Weidema Inc. 146,410.59$ 2,781,801.28$ NE Corcoran Trunk Infrastructure SR Weidema, Inc and S.R. Weidema, Inc. (CONTRACTOR) and all authorized changes therto: By Title Approval: S.R. Weidema, Inc.Date Date Application for Payment Form Project No. 227705275 00 62 76-2 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. END OF SECTION CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR I hereby certify that the work and the materials supplied to date, as shown on the request for payment, represents the actual value of accomplishment under the terms of the contract dated 07/16/2024 between betweeen the City of Corcoran (OWNER) SR Weidema, Inc Andy Burke Project Manager 12/2/24 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Steve Hegland, PE Nick Wyers, PE Project/File: 227704864 Date: December 3, 2024 Subject: Pay Request #5 to Fehn Companies, Inc. – Stieg Road Improvements Council Action Requested Staff is recommending the City Council Approve Pay Application #5 for the Stieg Road Improvements project to Fehn Companies, Inc. in the amount of $672,878.90. Summary The Phase 1 work (the eastern portion of the project) has been substantially completed with only restoration and final bituminous placement remaining for the spring. Work on Phase 2 (the western portion of the project) is significantly complete with installation of sand and gravel being completed during the week of December 2. Once this work is complete Fehn will re-open the road to traffic throughout the winter. It is anticipated that the curb and gutter and bituminous pavement in Phase 2 as well as final restoration will be completed as soon as conditions allow in 2025. The signed pay request form and pay application is attached for review. Below is a summary of the work completed to date: Total Contract Value to Date $1,984,031.10 Work Completed to Date $1,273,640.11 5% Retainage $63,682.01 Amount Paid to Date $537,079.20 Total Pay App #5 $672,878.90 Engineer’s Recommendation We recommend approving Pay Request #5 to Fehn Companies, Inc. in the amount of $672,878.90. Agenda Item 6p. Pay Request #5 City of Corcoran Stieg Road Improvements Project Number: 227704864 12/2/2024 LINE NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE BASE BID: QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $47,685.00 47,685.00$ 0.75 35,763.75$ 0.75 35,763.75$ 0.0 -$ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $4,794.00 4,794.00$ 1 4,794.00$ 1.00 4,794.00$ 0.0 -$ 3 CLEARING & GRUBBING TREE 21 $715.00 15,015.00$ 42.15 30,137.25$ 42.15 30,137.25$ 0.0 -$ 4 CLEARING & GRUBBING ACRE 0.15 $15,582.00 2,337.30$ 0.15 2,337.30$ 0.15 2,337.30$ 0.0 -$ 5 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL TRAFFIC SIGN EACH 8 $255.00 2,040.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 6 REMOVE TRAFFIC SIGN AND POST EACH 2 $40.80 81.60$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 7 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 252 $4.55 1,146.60$ 116 527.80$ 50.00 227.50$ 66.0 300.30$ 8 REMOVE 4" DRAINTILE LIN FT 548 $3.50 1,918.00$ 548 1,918.00$ 548.00 1,918.00$ 0.0 -$ 9 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH 10 $137.70 1,377.00$ 4 550.80$ 2.00 275.40$ 2.0 275.40$ 10 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 10 $5.80 58.00$ 38 220.40$ 38.00 220.40$ 0.0 -$ 11 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 40 $6.95 278.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 12 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQ YD 10 $12.00 120.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 13 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 40 $6.20 248.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 14 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 110 $3.10 341.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 15 REMOVE BITUMINOUS TRAIL PAVEMENT SQ YD 100 $3.40 340.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 16 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 1190 $1.75 2,082.50$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 17 EDGE MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 50.00 $25.50 1,275.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 18 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 150 $2.00 300.00$ 85 170.00$ 85.00 170.00$ 0.0 -$ 19 REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS LUMP SUM 1 $3,060.00 3,060.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 20 4" SCHEDULE 80 CONDUIT CROSSING LIN FT 560 $11.20 6,272.00$ 370 4,144.00$ 65.00 728.00$ 305.0 3,416.00$ 21 RELOCATE PRIVATE IRRIGATION SYSTEM EACH 1 $3,595.00 3,595.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 22 TEMPORARY MAILBOXES LUMP SUM 1 $1,233.00 1,233.00$ 1 1,233.00$ 1.00 1,233.00$ 0.0 -$ 23 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 25 $165.00 4,125.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 24 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 50 $76.00 3,800.00$ 20 1,520.00$ 20.00 1,520.00$ 0.0 -$ 25 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOXES EACH 12 $231.00 2,772.00$ 9 2,079.00$ 0.00 -$ 9.0 2,079.00$ 26 SALAVAGE AND RELOCATE FENCE LIN FT 324 $31.00 10,044.00$ 100 3,100.00$ 100.00 3,100.00$ 0.0 -$ 27 SALVAGE AND RELOCATE HYDRANT AND VALVE EACH 1 $5,100.00 5,100.00$ 1 5,100.00$ 1.00 5,100.00$ 0.0 -$ 28 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE 5 NON-WOVEN SQ YD 16700 $2.75 45,925.00$ 16700 45,925.00$ 4,840.00 13,310.00$ 11,860.0 32,615.00$ 29 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (EV) CU YD 12500 $16.20 202,500.00$ 10105 163,701.00$ 2,678.00 43,383.60$ 7,427.0 120,317.40$ 30 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (EV) CU YD 19110 $3.75 71,662.50$ 16955 63,581.25$ 11,265.00 42,243.75$ 5,690.0 21,337.50$ 31 COMMON BORROW (EV)CU YD 200 $29.55 5,910.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 32 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW, 5% MODIFIED TON 7600 $11.10 84,360.00$ 5,870 65,157.00$ 2,792.00 30,991.20$ 3,078.0 34,165.80$ 33 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 100% CRUSHED TON 12660 $20.20 255,732.00$ 11549 233,289.80$ 4,544.60 91,800.92$ 7,004.4 141,488.88$ 34 SHOULDER BASE AGGREGATE CLASS 2, 100% CRUSHED TON 96 $37.20 3,571.20$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 35 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 802 $3.95 3,167.90$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 36 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 1930 $91.65 176,884.50$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 37 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 3850 $82.70 318,395.00$ 1173.22 97,025.29$ 1,173.22 97,025.29$ 0.0 -$ 38 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) - DRIVEWAY TON 30 $169.00 5,070.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 39 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) - TRAIL TON 420 $107.00 44,940.00$ 175.26 18,752.82$ 175.26 18,752.82$ 0.0 -$ 40 4" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAINTILE PIPE LIN FT 3810 $14.30 54,483.00$ 3696 52,852.80$ 830.00 11,869.00$ 2,866.0 40,983.80$ 41 4" PVC DRAINTILE CLEANOUT W/ THREADED CAP EACH 13 $255.00 3,315.00$ 14 3,570.00$ 4.00 1,020.00$ 10.0 2,550.00$ 42 6" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAINTILE PIPE LIN FT 75 $23.50 1,762.50$ 60 1,410.00$ 0.00 -$ 60.0 1,410.00$ 43 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 140 $73.50 10,290.00$ 33.5 2,462.25$ 33.50 2,462.25$ 0.0 -$ 44 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER - DESIGN B418 LIN FT 5220 $17.35 90,567.00$ 1958 33,971.30$ 1,958.00 33,971.30$ 0.0 -$ 45 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 940 $9.20 8,648.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 46 CONCRETE ADA PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP EACH 4 $1,020.00 4,080.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 47 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 78 $51.00 3,978.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 48 SIGN PANELS - STREET NAME EACH 8 $331.50 2,652.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 49 INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH 17 $122.40 2,080.80$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 50 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 120 $38.80 4,656.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 51 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT - MAINTAINED EACH 5 $1,491.00 7,455.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 52 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 23 $306.00 7,038.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ COMPLETED TO DATE Less Previous Payments PAY REQUEST #5 December 2024 53 CULVERT END PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 9 $76.50 688.50$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 54 SALVAGE AND RESPREAD TOPSOIL SQ YD 13310 $1.90 25,289.00$ 7918 15,044.20$ 2,030.00 3,857.00$ 5,888.0 11,187.20$ 55 FERTILIZER TYPE 2 LB 280 $1.10 308.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 56 HYDROMULCH SQ YD 6420 $1.10 7,062.00$ 1636 1,799.60$ 0.00 -$ 1,636.0 1,799.60$ 57 SEED MIXTURE 25-151 LB 140 $3.75 525.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 58 SEED MIXTURE 25-131 LB 60 $4.10 246.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 59 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - CATERGORY 25 SQ YD 120 $1.65 198.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 60 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 7300 $2.60 18,980.00$ 4483 11,655.80$ 4,483.00 11,655.80$ 0.0 -$ 61 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG - MAINTAINED LIN FT 1000 $2.85 2,850.00$ 1000 2,850.00$ 1,000.00 2,850.00$ 0.0 -$ 62 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 $745.00 1,490.00$ 2 1,490.00$ 1.00 745.00$ 1.0 745.00$ 63 12" PP PIPE STORM LIN FT 64 $40.80 2,611.20$ 37 1,509.60$ 37.00 1,509.60$ 0.0 -$ 64 12" METAL FLARED END SECTION EACH 4 $408.00 1,632.00$ 2 816.00$ 2.00 816.00$ 0.0 -$ 65 12" RC FLARED END SECTION W/TRASHGUARD EACH 3 $1,632.00 4,896.00$ 3 4,896.00$ 0.00 -$ 3.0 4,896.00$ 66 15" RC FLARED END SECTION W/TRASHGUARD EACH 2 $1,836.00 3,672.00$ 2 3,672.00$ 2.00 3,672.00$ 0.0 -$ 67 18" RC FLARED END SECTION W/TRASHGUARD EACH 2 $1,938.00 3,876.00$ 2 3,876.00$ 0.00 -$ 2.0 3,876.00$ 68 12" RC STORM PIPE LIN FT 523 $53.00 27,719.00$ 552 29,256.00$ 91.00 4,823.00$ 461.0 24,433.00$ 69 15" RC STORM PIPE LIN FT 740 $59.20 43,808.00$ 754 44,636.80$ 289.00 17,108.80$ 465.0 27,528.00$ 70 18" RC STORM PIPE LIN FT 427 $63.30 27,029.10$ 434 27,472.20$ 39.00 2,468.70$ 395.0 25,003.50$ 71 21" RC STORM PIPE LIN FT 143 $73.50 10,510.50$ 135 9,922.50$ 0.00 -$ 135.0 9,922.50$ 72 36" RC STORM PIPE LIN FT 13 $194.00 2,522.00$ 9 1,746.00$ 0.00 -$ 9.0 1,746.00$ 73 INSTALL PRECAST STORM STRUCTURE (SUPPLIED BY OWNER) EACH 6 $1,734.00 10,404.00$ 6 10,404.00$ 0.00 -$ 6.0 10,404.00$ 74 CONSTRUCT 4' DIAMETER PRECAST STORM STRUCTURE EACH 5 $4,182.00 20,910.00$ 5 20,910.00$ 2.00 8,364.00$ 3.0 12,546.00$ 75 CONSTRUCT 9' DIAMETER PRECAST STORM STRUCTURE EACH 1 $20,400.00 20,400.00$ 1 20,400.00$ 0.00 -$ 1.0 20,400.00$ 76 CONSTRUCT 2' x 3' CATCH BASIN EACH 5 $3,264.00 16,320.00$ 5 16,320.00$ 2.00 6,528.00$ 3.0 9,792.00$ 77 6" PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL EACH 1 $714.00 714.00$ 1 714.00$ 0.00 -$ 1.0 714.00$ 78 RANDOM CLASS 3 GRANITE RIP RAP TON 12 $110.00 1,320.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 79 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EACH 2 $2,346.00 4,692.00$ 2 4,692.00$ 0.00 -$ 2.0 4,692.00$ 80 8" PVC C-900 DR-18 WATERMAIN LIN FT 94 $60.20 5,658.80$ 98 5,899.60$ 0.00 -$ 98.0 5,899.60$ 81 12" PVC C-900 DR-18 WATERMAIN LIN FT 1358 $80.60 109,454.80$ 1358 109,454.80$ 137.00 11,042.20$ 1,221.0 98,412.60$ 82 6" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN LIN FT 3 $78.60 235.80$ 47.5 3,733.50$ 40.00 3,144.00$ 7.5 589.50$ 83 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX EACH 1 $6,120.00 6,120.00$ 1 6,120.00$ 0.00 -$ 1.0 6,120.00$ 84 HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE EACH 1 $9,384.00 9,384.00$ 1 9,384.00$ 0.00 -$ 1.0 9,384.00$ 85 12" PLUG WITH BLOWOFF VALVE EACH 1 $878.00 878.00$ 1 878.00$ 1.00 878.00$ 0.0 -$ 86 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 1047 $13.30 13,925.10$ 866 11,517.80$ 266.00 3,537.80$ 600.0 7,980.00$ 87 4" SOLID LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 1260 $0.75 945.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 88 4" SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 2640 $0.75 1,980.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 89 4" BROKEN LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 530 $0.75 397.50$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 90 4" DOTTED LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 160 $0.75 120.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 91 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 1540 $2.50 3,850.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 92 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 2970 $1.50 4,455.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 93 6" SOLID LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 2550 $1.40 3,570.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 94 6" SOLID LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 6920 $0.90 6,228.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 95 6" DOTTED LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 41 $1.40 57.40$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 96 24" SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN LIN FT 176 $19.80 3,484.80$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 97 24" SOLID LINE (YELLOW) MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 277 $12.00 3,324.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 98 CROSSWALK STRIPING MULTI-COMPONENT SQ FT 270 $9.90 2,673.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 99 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (WHITE) PREF THERM GROUND IN EACH 2 $525.00 1,050.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ 100 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT EACH 22 $155.00 3,410.00$ 0 -$ 0.00 -$ 0.0 -$ TOTAL BASE BID: 1,982,434.90$ 1,256,364.21$ 557,354.63$ 699,009.58$ TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACT: 1,982,434.90$ LINE NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE CHANGE ORDER #1 QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST CO1.1 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT EA -1 155.00$ (155.00)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.2 4" SOLID LINE (WHITE) MULTI-COMPONENT LF -167 0.75$ (125.25)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.3 REMOVE HYDRANT LEAD LF 14 24.85$ 347.90$ 14 347.90$ 14.0 347.90$ 0.0 -$ CO1.4 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 12" x 6" TEE EA 1 3,456.00$ 3,456.00$ 1 3,456.00$ 1.0 3,456.00$ 0.0 -$ CO1.5 6" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN LF 21 78.60$ 1,650.60$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ Less Previous Payments PAY REQUEST #5 December 2024COMPLETED TO DATE CO1.6 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 62 13.30$ 824.60$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.7 HYDRANT EXTENSION EA 1 3,024.00$ 3,024.00$ 1 3,024.00$ 0.0 -$ 1.0 3,024.00$ CO1.8 12" RC STORM PIPE LF 31 53.00$ 1,643.00$ 31 1,643.00$ 0.0 -$ 31.0 1,643.00$ CO1.9 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW, 5% MODIFIED TON -134 11.10$ (1,487.40)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.10 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 100% CRUSHED TON -156 20.20$ (3,151.20)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.11 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON -25 91.65$ (2,291.25)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.12 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON -50 82.70$ (4,135.00)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.13 SALVAGE AND RESPREAD TOPSOIL LS 1 1,600.00$ 1,600.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.14 SEED MIXTURE 25-151 LB 320 3.75$ 1,200.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.15 FERTILIZER TYPE 2 LB 532 1.10$ 585.20$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.16 HYDROMULCH SY 1430 1.10$ 1,573.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.17 INSTALL 6' HEIGHT CONIFEROUS TREE EA 31 533.00$ 16,523.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.18 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL FENCE LF 80 31.00$ 2,480.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.19 COMMON EXCAVATION (ONSITE)CY 2680 3.75$ 10,050.00$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.20 COMMON EXCAVATION (OFFSITE)CY -2680 16.20$ (43,416.00)$ 0 -$ 0.0 -$ 0.0 -$ CO1.21 SELEC GRANULAR BORROW ALT SOURCE TON 7600 1.50$ 11,400.00$ 5870 8,805.00$ 2,792.0 4,188.00$ 3,078.0 4,617.00$ TOTAL CHANGE ORDER #1 1,596.20$ 17,275.90$ 7,991.90$ 9,284.00$ TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT: 1,984,031.10$ 1,273,640.11$ 565,346.53$ 708,293.58$ ORIGINAL CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT 1,982,434.90$ 1,273,640.11$ 565,346.53$ 708,293.58$ TOTAL CHANGE ORDER:1,596.20$ CURRENT RETAINAGE (5%)63,682.01$ 28,267.33$ 35,414.68$ TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT:1,984,031.10$ TOTAL CURRENT PAY REQUEST 1,209,958.10$ 537,079.20$ 672,878.90$ SUBTOTAL CONTRACT SUMMARY COMPLETE TO DATE PAY REQUEST #5LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS SECTION 00 62 76 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT FORM OWNER: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: 5 Original Contract Amount: Contract Changes approved to Date CO #1 Revised Contract Price : Work Completed to Date (attached): Retainage to Date, 5%: Work Completed to Date Less Retainage to Date: Total Amount Previously Certified: Payment Request This Estimate: CONTRACTOR Application for Payment Form Project No. 227704864 00 62 76-1 PAY ESTIMATE NO. I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid. 1,982,434.90$ 1,596.20$ 1,984,031.10$ 1,273,640.11$ 537,079.20$ 672,878.90$ City of Corcoran Fehn Companies, Inc. 63,682.01$ 1,209,958.10$ Stieg Road Improvements and Fehn Companies (CONTRACTOR) and all authorized changes therto: By Title Approval: (CONTRACTOR)Date Date CITY OF CORCORAN Date Application for Payment Form Project No. 227704864 00 62 76-2 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. END OF SECTION CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR I hereby certify that the work and the materials supplied to date, as shown on the request for payment, represents the actual value of accomplishment under the terms of the contract between the City of Corcoran (OWNER) Memo To:Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From:Ash Hammerbeck, PE Steve Hegland, PE File:227704426 Date:December 2, 2024 Reference: Change Order No. 5 – Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Council Action Requested Staff is recommending City Council to review and approve Change Order No. 5 for the Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Project. Summary Attached to this memo is Change Order No. 5 for the Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Project. This change order covers the modifications associated with Change Order Proposals (COPs) No. 14, 15, 16, 18, and 19, attached to this memo. These changes are associated with additional costs related to RFIs (Request for Information) and field correspondence for the project, covering completed work and required adjustments based on the clarifications and instructions provided through RFIs. A description of the work covered under this change order is described below. Supporting documentation from the contractor is attached. COP No.14 Description: This Change Order Proposal covers the labor and material costs associated with RFI 007 – Sump Pump Valve/Meter Vault. The scope of work includes installing a sump pump, required by MDH (Minnesota Department of Health), with a 20-foot cord, plug, and integral float switch. Additionally, conduit and wire will be provided for a weatherproof outlet within the vault near Well No. 1, and a circuit will be established from a spare breaker. The total cost for this work is $5,093.10. COP No.15 Description: This Change Order Proposal covers the labor and material costs associated with RFI 033 - Entry 102 Floor. The scope of work includes providing a recessed floor mat and frame in Entry 102 at door 102-1, as it was not included in the original design. The total cost for this work is $4,083.77. COP No.16 Description: This Change Order Proposal covers the labor and material costs associated with RFI 054 - Concrete Pavement Thickness. The scope of work includes increasing the thickness of the concrete pavement section from 4 inches to 6 inches in the area in front of the overhead doors, as part of the concrete driveway apron, in accordance with the structural detail. The total cost for this work is $4,276.32. Agenda Item 6q. December 2, 2024 City of Corcoran Page 2 of 2 Reference: Change Order No. 5 – Corcoran Water Treatment Plant COP No.18 Description: This Change Order Proposal covers the labor and material costs associated with RFI 010 - Chemical Tank Questions. The scope of work includes applying chemical-resistant paint to the interior positive side of the concrete knee and side walls of the containment area. Additionally, a credit is provided for the polyethylene containment boxes, as they are not required. The total cost for this work is $8,248.91. COP No.19 Description: This Change Order Proposal covers the labor and material costs associated with RFI 039 - Exhaust Duct & Plumbing Drain Conflict. The scope of work includes sawcutting a new opening in the concrete wall to the east of the doorway in Room 003 Mech/Pump Access to reroute the 20"x20" exhaust duct, which was previously in conflict with plumbing drain lines. The opening on the west side will be covered with a louver. The total cost for this work is $2,248.73. Engineer’s Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council review and approve of the attached Change Order No. 5. EJCDC® C-941, Change Order EJCDC® C-941, Change Order, Rev.1. Copyright© 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 2 CHANGE ORDER NO.: 5 Owner:City of Corcoran, Minnesota Owner’s Project No.: Engineer:Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Engineer’s Project No.:227704426 Contractor:Rice Lake Construction Group Contractor’s Project No.:2305 Project:Water Treatment Plant Contract Name:City of Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Date Issued:12/2/2024 Effective Date of Change Order: ____________ The Contract is modified as follows upon execution of this Change Order: Description: This change order covers the modifications associated with Change Order Proposals No. 14, 15, 16, 18 and 19 for the Water Treatment Plant Project. Attachments: 1. Change Order No. 5 Memo 2. Change Order Proposal 14 3. Change Order Proposal 15 4. Change Order Proposal 16 5. Change Order Proposal 18 6. Change Order Proposal 19 Change in Contract Price Change in Contract Times Original Contract Price:Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion: December 31, 2024 $16,728,200.00 Ready for final payment: March 1, 2025 Increase from previously approved Change Orders No.1 to No.4 : No increase/decrease from previously approved Change Orders No.1 to No.4 : Substantial Completion: 0 days $216,362.26 Ready for final payment: 0 days Contract Price prior to this Change Order:Contract Times prior to this Change Order: Substantial Completion: December 31, 2024 $16,944,562.26 Ready for final payment: March 1, 2025 Increase for this Change Order:No increase/decrease for this Change Order: Substantial Completion: 0 days $23,950.83 Ready for final payment: 0 days EJCDC® C-941, Change Order EJCDC® C-941, Change Order, Rev.1. Copyright© 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 2 Contract Price incorporating this Change Order:Contract Times with all approved Change Orders: Substantial Completion: December 31, 2024 $16,968,513.09 Ready for final payment: March 1, 2025 Recommended by Engineer Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Accepted by Contractor Rice Lake Construction Group By: Title: Date: By: Authorized by Owner City of Corcoran Title: Date: Project Engineer 12/3/2024 2305 Corcoran WTP 22360 County Road 12, PO Box 517 11/6/2024 Deerwood, MN 56444 14 - Valve Vault Sump Pump HOURS $ RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ $0.00 Killmer Electric Company - Sump Pump Proposal 1.00 LS -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 2,952.09$ -$ 2,952.09$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Labor 1.00 LS 4.00 100.00$ $400.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ 400.00$ Equipment 1.00 LS -$ $0.00 664.25$ $664.25 -$ -$ 664.25$ Freight 1.00 LS -$ $0.00 500.00$ $500.00 -$ -$ 500.00$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Misc. Small Tools and Mat'l 5% of Labor 1.00 ea 5.00%20.00$ Sales Tax 1.00 ea 8.525%99.25$ Totals 4.00$ 400.00$ 1,164.25$ 2,952.09$ -$ 4,635.59$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Subs (5%)147.60$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Labor, Material, and Equipment (15%)234.64$ Bond and Insurance Cost (1.5%)75.27$ Total Change Order Proposal Request 5,093.10$ Days Requested 2 MATERIAL SUBCONTRACTOR TOTAL EQUIPMENT TOTAL LINE TOTALDESCRIPTION QTY UNIT LABOR RLCG PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: COP: CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL 2305 Corcoran WTP 22360 County Road 12, PO Box 517 11/6/2024 Deerwood, MN 56444 15-Floor Mat HOURS $ RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ $0.00 Equipment - Floor Mat 1.00 EA -$ $0.00 2,480.00$ $2,480.00 -$ -$ 2,480.00$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Labor - Installtion 1.00 LS 8.00 100.00$ $800.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ 800.00$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Misc. Small Tools and Mat'l 5% of Labor 1.00 ea 5.00%40.00$ Sales Tax 1.00 ea 8.525%211.42$ Totals 8.00$ 800.00$ 2,480.00$ -$ -$ 3,531.42$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Subs (5%)-$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Labor, Material, and Equipment (15%)492.00$ Bond and Insurance Cost (1.5%)60.35$ Total Change Order Proposal Request 4,083.77$ Days Requested 2 RLCG PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: COP: CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL MATERIAL SUBCONTRACTOR TOTAL EQUIPMENT TOTAL LINE TOTALDESCRIPTION QTY UNIT LABOR 2305 Corcoran WTP 22360 County Road 12, PO Box 517 11/6/2024 Deerwood, MN 56444 COP16-Site Concrete Thickness HOURS $ RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ $0.00 North Country Concrete - Addaitonal Concrete -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 4,012.50$ -$ 4,012.50$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Misc. Small Tools and Mat'l 5% of Labor 1.00 ea 5.00%-$ Sales Tax 1.00 ea 8.525%-$ Totals -$ -$ -$ 4,012.50$ -$ 4,012.50$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Subs (5%)200.63$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Labor, Material, and Equipment (15%)-$ Bond and Insurance Cost (1.5%)63.20$ Total Change Order Proposal Request 4,276.32$ Days Requested 2 MATERIAL SUBCONTRACTOR TOTAL EQUIPMENT TOTAL LINE TOTALDESCRIPTION QTY UNIT LABOR RLCG PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: COP: CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL 2305 Corcoran WTP 22360 County Road 12, PO Box 517 11/13/2024 Deerwood, MN 56444 18-Chemical Resistant Paint HOURS $ RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ $0.00 Steibrecher Painting Company - Paint 1.00 LS -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 9,240.00$ -$ 9,240.00$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Polyethylene Box - Credit 1.00 EA -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 (1,500.00)$ -$ (1,500.00)$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Misc. Small Tools and Mat'l 5% of Labor 1.00 ea 5.00%-$ Sales Tax 1.00 ea 8.525%-$ Totals -$ -$ -$ 7,740.00$ -$ 7,740.00$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Subs (5%)387.00$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Labor, Material, and Equipment (15%)-$ Bond and Insurance Cost (1.5%)121.91$ Total Change Order Proposal Request 8,248.91$ Days Requested 2 MATERIAL SUBCONTRACTOR TOTAL EQUIPMENT TOTAL LINE TOTALDESCRIPTION QTY UNIT LABOR RLCG PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: COP: CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL 2305 Corcoran WTP 22360 County Road 12, PO Box 517 11/12/2024 Deerwood, MN 56444 19 - HVAC Duct Pump Room Conflict HOURS $ RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ $0.00 Empire Concrete Cutting & Coring 1.00 EA -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 2,500.00$ -$ 2,500.00$ Credit - Core Drill 20" 1.00 EA -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 (390.00)$ -$ (390.00)$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Misc. Small Tools and Mat'l 5% of Labor 1.00 ea 5.00%-$ Sales Tax 1.00 ea 8.525%-$ Totals -$ -$ -$ 2,110.00$ -$ 2,110.00$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Subs (5%)105.50$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Labor, Material, and Equipment (15%)-$ Bond and Insurance Cost (1.5%)33.23$ Total Change Order Proposal Request 2,248.73$ Days Requested 2 RLCG PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: COP: CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL MATERIAL SUBCONTRACTOR TOTAL EQUIPMENT TOTAL LINE TOTALDESCRIPTION QTY UNIT LABOR Memo To:Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From:Ash Hammerbeck, PE Steve Hegland, PE File:227704426 Date:December 2, 2024 Reference: Change Order No. 6 – Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Council Action Requested Staff is recommending City Council to review and approve Change Order No. 6 for the Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Project. Change Order #6 Change Order No. 6 for the Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Project extends the contract times and dates of substantial and final completion to April 30, 2025 and June 30, 2025, respectively. Change Order Proposal 13 from Rice Lake (attached), documents several factors that have contributed to an extension of the contract time associated with delays from prolonged rainfall over the course of construction, poor soil conditions, extended watertightness testing, and supply chain issues with electrical and process equipment. Throughout construction, Rice Lake has provided accurate and updated timelines that has supported their request for a contract extension and has worked diligently in providing quality workmanship that will result in an exceptional facility for the City of Corcoran. This change order resets the schedule alignment and sets clear expectations for project completion in the context of the larger distribution system components. COP#13 Description: This change proposal outlines the requested time extension for the Corcoran Water Treatment Plant project due to several factors impacting the schedule. Prolonged rainfall and poor site soil conditions from Fall 2023 through Spring 2024 resulted in substantial delays for concrete, utility, and earthwork. The site’s clay soils, combined with frequent rain, created difficult working conditions that necessitated additional backfill and prolonged subgrade preparation. Watertightness testing also extended beyond anticipated time, delaying subsequent construction steps. Additionally, long lead times for critical electrical gear and process equipment have postponed the timeline for well pump commissioning and plant operation, with potential impacts extending into winter. Engineer’s Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council review and approve of the attached Change Order No. 6. Agenda Item 6r. EJCDC® C-941, Change Order EJCDC® C-941, Change Order, Rev.1. Copyright© 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 2 CHANGE ORDER NO.: 6 Owner:City of Corcoran, Minnesota Owner’s Project No.: Engineer:Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Engineer’s Project No.:227704426 Contractor:Rice Lake Construction Group Contractor’s Project No.:2305 Project:Water Treatment Plant Contract Name:City of Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Date Issued:12/2/2024 Effective Date of Change Order: ____________ The Contract is modified as follows upon execution of this Change Order: Description: This change order covers the time modifications associated with Change Order Proposal 13. Attachments: 1. Change Order No. 6 Memo 2. Change Order Proposal 13 Change in Contract Price Change in Contract Times Original Contract Price:Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion: December 31, 2024 $16,728,200.00 Ready for final payment: March 1, 2025 Increase from previously approved Change Orders No.1 to No.5 : No increase/decrease from previously approved Change Orders No.1 to No.5 : Substantial Completion: 0 days $240,313.09 Ready for final payment: 0 days Contract Price prior to this Change Order:Contract Times prior to this Change Order: Substantial Completion: December 31, 2024 $16,968,513.09 Ready for final payment: March 1, 2025 No increase/decrease for this Change Order:Increase for this Change Order: Substantial Completion: 120 days $0 Ready for final payment: 121 days Contract Price incorporating this Change Order:Contract Times with all approved Change Orders: Substantial Completion: April 30, 2025 $16,968,513.09 Ready for final payment: June 30, 2025 EJCDC® C-941, Change Order EJCDC® C-941, Change Order, Rev.1. Copyright© 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 2 Recommended by Engineer Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Accepted by Contractor Rice Lake Construction Group By: Title: Date: By: Authorized by Owner City of Corcoran Title: Date: Project Engineer 12/3/2024 Change Order Proposal #: 13 October 11, 2024 Ash Hammerbeck, PE - Stantec Re: Time Extension for Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Ash: We are requesting a contract time extension for the Substantial Completion and Final Completion Dates for Corcoran Water Treatment Plant. The contract extension is for the cumulative impacts of electrical gear procurement lead time, changes, weather, and unforeseen circumstances. This time extension is per Article 4 of the Standard General Conditions (EJCDC) of the project contract. Paragraph 4.05, part C addresses “causes not the fault or and beyond the control of the Owner, Contractor”, etc. and Part E references “circumstances that form the bases of the requested adjustment”. The current schedule indicates March 20th, 2025 for Substantial Completion and June 19th for Final Completion. However, this could be further impacted depending the actual delivery dates of electrical equipment. The importance of the project is understood. We are in constant communication with the affected supplier and are doing all we can to define and improve the lead time of the electrical equipment. We look forward to successful project delivery. Sincerely, RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP Matt Messerly Project Manager 218-670-1937 October 15, 2024 Ash Hammerbeck, PE – Stantec Steve Hegland, PE – Stantec Re: Time Extension for Corcoran Water Treatment Plant – Change Order Proposal #13 Ash and Steve, Please see additional information below regarding the time extension for Corcoran Water Treatment Plant. We appreciate the understanding and ongoing teamwork to move the project forward. The project schedule, as a document and tool, is intended to inform the team, promote discussion, and forecast the project timeframe. The first major impact is weather and soil conditions. Rainfall occurred from Fall 2023 through Spring 2024 that impacted critical concrete, utility, and earth work. Nearly 70 days with precipitation have been recorded, with 2 or 3 times as many days impacted. Fourteen inches of rain fell on site in the last week of September and into the first week of October 2023 , which occurred over 9 days. Twenty five inches of rain was recorded on site from the end of March through the middle of June. Not only were these days directly impacted, but the saturation of the clay soils on site decreased productivity drastically on all fronts. For each day of rainfall, several additional days were impacted. The site is predominantly clay soils, which are poor quality for workability. Any amount of rain turns the surface of the site to slime. The fact that it rained so often in the pattern that it did, produced very wet, muddy, sloppy working conditions for manpower and equipment moving and working on site. Because much of the saturated clay on site proved unsuitable for backfill, over 10,000 cubic yards of sand was imported to keep the backfill effort, and the project overall, moving forward – as the soils that were oversaturated from rainfall. The lingering effects of over saturated clay soils are ongoing as the preparation of the driveway subgrade has occurred. The subgrade South of the building had to be dug, spread, and turned over a period of three weeks to dry it out enough to get it to a compactible state. Work continued in spite of the challenges presented. Dealing with these weather impacts has taken effort and resources not accounted for in the contract timeframe. Another impact to the project timeframe is watertightness testing. Nearly 50 days worth of time was invested to satisfy the requirements for each waterbearing substructure. Quantitative portions of the tests have passed while the qualitative, or “visual” portion of the tests, often took days and weeks longer to pass. The testing moved forward in spite of the subjective nature of the visual inspection but not without significant delays to work through the teams’ understandings of industry standards for acceptable passing tests. Impacts from extended watertightness testing set back the next steps in the project work – whether a concrete pour, waterproofing, backfill, painting, etc. The culmination of time requested for change orders to date is 29 working days. This is the sum for Change Order Proposals 1 through 12, as incorporated by Change Orders 1 through 4. Of these changes, there is the ongoing coordination of the Chlortainer installation. Being in the works for several months, some of the work related to this added scope has impacted contract work, including completion of the roof. The time forecasted for this work is the best estimate, but until this equipment is up and running, the full impact will be unknown. Finally, the long lead time for electrical gear for the well control building has a significant impact on project completion. The procurement of this electrical gear is impacted by the supply chain and manufacturing issues that have existed for the last few years. This electrical gear is a critical component of the plant needed to power the well pump for startup, commissioning, and ultimately operation. The source well is required to be online before commissioning the filter and underdrain system and putting this core treatment equipment into service. The submittal for the controls and instruments was returned in October 2023. At the beginning of the project, it was known that the motor control centers had an expected lead time of over one year. Please see below statement from our electrical subcontractor Killmer Electric: “Still waiting on MCC2 for the well building which is holding Starnet up from starting fabrication. Once they have that they have 4-6 weeks before they can ship barring any production conflicts and testing goes well. So right now still up in the air when we will receive well 1 building but at least out till middle of December at this point. Once we have all parts on site we are looking at 4-5weeks to get installed and ready to scheduling commissioning with vendors and ASC. Now with possible holiday and weather conflicts this could be affected more as we cannot pull wire when temperatures are below 0. Working on getting some more information on the MCC delay but this is all we have for now.” Multiple schedule impacts to date have been dealt with in stride, but not without extended time and resources expenditure to keep the job moving. We’ve put forth effort to keep this project moving forward in a meaningful fashion, and will continue to do so. If everything goes smoothly, we believe we can be done in March. Sincerely, RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP Matt Messerly Project Manager 218-670-1937 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Ash Hammerbeck, PE Steve Hegland, PE Project/File: 227704426 Date: December 2, 2024 Subject: Corcoran WTP - Pay Application #19 Council Action Requested Staff is recommending Council approve Pay Application #19 for the Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Project to Rice Lake Construction Group in the amount of $547,507.97. Summary Rice Lake continued work on the project including watertightness testing, rubbing and patching walls, exterior ladders/stairs, fiberglass grating, translucent wall panel, fiber cement siding, TPO roofing, metal roofing, doors and windows, painting, pre-engineered building, process pipes, fittings, valves, and accessories, plumbing fixtures and fittings, plant controls, interior fixtures and lamps, distribution equipment, and obtaining the necessary utilities and materials. This pay request is for the work performed through 11/30/2024. The signed payment request form and pay application is attached for review. Total Contract Value to Date $ 16,944,562.26 Work Completed to Date $ 14,057,894.93 5% Retainage $ 702,894.75 Amount Paid to Date $ 12,807,492.21 Total Pay App #19 $ 547,507.97 Engineer’s Recommendation We have reviewed the request and recommend approving Pay Application #19 to Rice Lake Construction Group in the amount of $547,507.97 for the work completed and materials stored to date. Agenda Item 6s. 12/2/2024 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Daryl Kirschenman, PE Steve Hegland, PE Project/File: 227705274 Date: December 2, 2024 Subject: Pay Application #20 to Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors Council Action Requested We recommend the City Council review and Approve Pay Application #20 for the Corcoran Water Tower Project to Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors in the amount of $16,328.60. This pay request covers work complete from October 4, 2024 through December 2, 2024. Summary Concrete floor, sidewalk and bollards are installed. Site grading and soil maintenance progress. Side door and garage door are installed. The signed payment request form and pay application is attached for review. Total Contract Value to Date $4,703,386.00 Work Completed to Date $4,248,541.00 5% Retainage $211,567.65 Amount Paid to Date $4,019,785.35 Total Pay App #19 $16,328.60 Engineer’s Recommendation We recommend approving Pay Application #20 to Phoenix Fabricators and Erector’s in the amount of $16,328.60. Agenda Item 6t. 227705274 3927 TWENTY From 11/16/24 To 12/15/24 12/15/24 A C D E F G H I J K L Item Quantity Units Unit Price ($) Value of Bid Item (C X E) ($) Estimated Quantity Incorporated in the Work Value of Work Completed to Date (E X G) ($) 1 1 LS 185,000.00 185,000.00 0.50 92,500.00 92,500.00 75% 92,500.00 2 1 LS 4,000.00 4,000.00 - - - 100% 4,000.00 3 1 LS 6,500.00 6,500.00 0.62 4,000.00 4,000.00 62% 2,500.00 4 1 LS 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.75 3,000.00 3,000.00 75% 1,000.00 5 50 CY 40.00 2,000.00 - - - 0% 2,000.00 6 1 EA 5,700.00 5,700.00 - - - 0% 5,700.00 7 355 LF 265.00 94,075.00 355.00 94,075.00 94,075.00 100% - 8 1 EA 31,000.00 31,000.00 1.00 31,000.00 31,000.00 100% - 9 18 LF 397.00 7,146.00 - - 0% 7,146.00 10 55 LF 117.00 6,435.00 55.00 6,435.00 6,435.00 100% - 11 2 EA 4,000.00 8,000.00 2.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 100% - 12 2 EA 8,512.00 17,024.00 2.00 17,024.00 17,024.00 100% - 13 4,000 LB 15.00 60,000.00 4,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 100% - 14 1 EA 1,800.00 1,800.00 1.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 100% - 15 20 SY 75.00 1,500.00 - - - 100% 1,500.00 16 2 EA 1,000.00 2,000.00 - - - 100% 2,000.00 17 1 LS 8,000.00 8,000.00 - - - 100% 8,000.00 18 1,750 SY 2.60 4,550.00 1,750.00 4,550.00 4,550.00 100% - 19 1,625 TN 49.00 79,625.00 1,625.00 79,625.00 79,625.00 100% - 20 175 TN 190.00 33,250.00 - - - 100% 33,250.00 21 225 TN 195.00 43,875.00 - - - 100% 43,875.00 22 510 LF 31.00 15,810.00 - - - 0% 15,810.00 23 410 LF 47.00 19,270.00 - - - 0% 19,270.00 24 1,250 LF 4.50 5,625.00 1,250.00 5,625.00 5,625.00 100% - 25 1 LS 8,500.00 8,500.00 - - - 0% 8,500.00 26 1.4 AC 8,220.00 11,508.00 - - - 0% 11,508.00 27 11 EA 820.00 9,020.00 - - - 0% 9,020.00 28 10 EA 670.00 6,700.00 - - - 0% 6,700.00 29 56 EA 100.00 5,600.00 - - - 0% 5,600.00 30 118 EA 28.00 3,304.00 - - - 0% 3,304.00 1 1 LS 115,000.00 115,000.00 1.00 115,000.00 115,000.00 100% - 1.10 1 LS 153,000.00 153,000.00 0.75 114,750.00 114,750.00 75% 38,250.00 1.11 1 LS 172,000.00 172,000.00 1.00 172,000.00 172,000.00 100% - 1.12 1 LS 194,000.00 194,000.00 1.00 194,000.00 194,000.00 100% - 1.13 1 LS 886,000.00 886,000.00 1.00 886,000.00 886,000.00 100% - 1.14 1 LS 1,216,994.00 1,216,994.00 1.00 1,216,994.00 1,216,994.00 100% - 1.15 1 LS 70,000.00 70,000.00 1.00 70,000.00 70,000.00 100% - 1.16 1 LS 380,000.00 380,000.00 1.00 380,000.00 380,000.00 100% - 1.17 1 LS 450,000.00 450,000.00 1.00 450,000.00 450,000.00 100% - 1.18 1 LS 20,000.00 20,000.00 - - 17,188.00 17,188.00 86% 2,812.00 1.19 1 LS 8,500.00 8,500.00 1.00 8,500.00 8,500.00 100% - MNDOT SEED MIXTURE 25-131 SHRUB 5 GAL. CONTAINER PERENNIAL 1 GAL. CONTAINER 2.5" B&B DECIDUOUS TREE 6' HT CONIFEROUS TREE BONDS / INSURANCE MOBILIZATION TANK DELIVERY TANK ERECTION TANK PAINTING TANK MIXING SYSTEM EROSION CONTROL ENGINEERING ALTERNATE A - 1,000,000 GALLON COMPOSITE TANK 20" GATE VALVE PART 1 SITE WORK MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL SALVAGE, STOCKPILE & RESPREAD TOPSOIL 20" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52, INCLUDE POLY WRAP B618 CURB SILT FENCE, MS INFILTRATION BASIN, FILTER FABRIC, 6' DRAIN TILE & 6' FLARED END SECTION B BITUMINOUS RIBBON CURB Original Contract % of Value of Item (J / F) (%) Balance to Finish (F - J) ($) BITUMINOUS WEAR SPWEA340B BITUMINOUS BASE SPNWB330B Description Work Completed Materials Currently Stored (not in G) ($) Work Completed and Materials Stored to Date (H + I) ($) Contract Information Bid Item No. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLACEMENT & REMOVAL COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 20" PVC WATER MAIN 20" PVC WATERMAIN, C900 Contractor's Application for PaymentProgress Estimate - Unit Price Work Owner's Project No.: Engineer's Project No.: Contractor's Project No.: City of Corcoran Stantec Consulting Services Phoenix Fabricators & Erectors, LLC 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tank Corcoran Water Tower Owner: Application Period:Application No.: Engineer: Contractor: Project: Contract: 6" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52, INCLUDE POLY WRAP 6" GATE VALVE & BOX 6" HYDRANT DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS FOUNDATION TANK SHAFT TANK MATERIAL / SHOP FABRICATION AGGREGATE BASE 4' X 6' OVERFLOW SPLASHPAD CONCRETE SIDEWALK 8" BOLLARD CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V NON WEAR Application Date: Unit Price EJCDC C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment (c) 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved.1 of 3 227705274 3927 TWENTY From 11/16/24 To 12/15/24 12/15/24 A C D E F G H I J K L Item Quantity Units Unit Price ($) Value of Bid Item (C X E) ($) Estimated Quantity Incorporated in the Work Value of Work Completed to Date (E X G) ($) B % of Value of Item (J / F) (%) Balance to Finish (F - J) ($)Description Work Completed Materials Currently Stored (not in G) ($) Work Completed and Materials Stored to Date (H + I) ($) Contract Information Bid Item No. Contractor's Application for PaymentProgress Estimate - Unit Price Work Owner's Project No.: Engineer's Project No.: Contractor's Project No.: City of Corcoran Stantec Consulting Services Phoenix Fabricators & Erectors, LLC 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tank Corcoran Water Tower Owner: Application Period:Application No.: Engineer: Contractor: Project: Contract: Application Date: 1.20 1 LS 160,000.00 160,000.00 0.34 54,400.00 54,400.00 50% 105,600.00 2 1 LS 25,000.00 25,000.00 - - - 0% 25,000.00 3 825 CY 51.00 42,075.00 825.00 42,075.00 42,075.00 100% - 4 1 LS 120,000.00 120,000.00 1.00 120,000.00 120,000.00 100% - 4,703,386.00$ 4,231,353.00$ 17,188.00$ 4,248,541.00$ 90%454,845.00$ Original Contract Totals COMMON EXCAVATION & SITE GRADING ELECTRICAL / CONTROLS LOGO ALLOWANCE STRUCTURAL FILL BELOW FOUNDATION Unit Price EJCDC C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment (c) 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved.2 of 3 227705274 3927 TWENTY From 11/16/24 To 12/15/24 12/15/24 A C D E F G H I J K L Item Quantity Units Unit Price ($) Value of Bid Item (C X E) ($) Estimated Quantity Incorporated in the Work Value of Work Completed to Date (E X G) ($) B % of Value of Item (J / F) (%) Balance to Finish (F - J) ($)Description Work Completed Materials Currently Stored (not in G) ($) Work Completed and Materials Stored to Date (H + I) ($) Contract Information Bid Item No. Contractor's Application for PaymentProgress Estimate - Unit Price Work Owner's Project No.: Engineer's Project No.: Contractor's Project No.: City of Corcoran Stantec Consulting Services Phoenix Fabricators & Erectors, LLC 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tank Corcoran Water Tower Owner: Application Period:Application No.: Engineer: Contractor: Project: Contract: Application Date: CO1 1.00 LS (19,576.92) (19,576.92) - - - 0% (19,576.92) CO1 1.00 LS 860.00 860.00 - - - 0% 860.00 - - - - (18,716.92)$ -$ -$ -$ 0%(18,716.92)$ 4,684,669.08$ 4,231,353.00$ 17,188.00$ 4,248,541.00$ 91%436,128.08$ Project Totals Change Order Totals Original Contract and Change Orders Change Orders DEDUCT CITY SUPPLIED 20" BV VALVE ON RISER INCREASE LOGO ALLOWANCE Unit Price EJCDC C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment (c) 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved.3 of 3 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Steve Hegland, PE Project/File: 227704747 Date: November 21, 2024 Subject: Change Order #2 and Pay Application #6 – Final - to Park Construction Company – Mass Grading and Stormwater Pond for City Center Drive and 79th Place Council Action Requested Staff is recommending Council Approve Change Order #2 and Pay Application #6 – Final - for the Mass Grading and Stormwater Pond for City Center Drive and 79th Place to Park Construction Company in the amount of $128,749.92. This approval is conditional until it is also approved by the St. Therese Development per the terms of the Cost Share Agreement. Change Order Summary The change order is a procedural item to reduce the final contract value on the project to match the final work completed as the project costs came in under the contractual value. As this project was a cost share between the City and St. Therese, the change order will document that there is no contractual items remaining on the construction project. Summary The grading portion of this project is completed with restoration completed and pond testing completed. We are recommending the Final Pay Request 6 be completed. This project was completed as a cost share between the City and the St. Therese Development in which the mass grading was completed and the subregional stormwater pond was constructed. Prior to the project approve, the City and St. Therese agreed to a cost share breakdown in which the two stakeholders agreed to the cost share breakdown of the various components of the project. Attached to this memo is the final breakdown of those construction costs. The final City portion of the construction contract is $561,696.67 while the final St. Therese portion of the construction contract was $812,811.43. Below is a summary of the work completed to date. Total Contract Value to Date $1,451,685.40 Change Order 2 Value ($77,177.30) Updated Contract Amount $1,374,508.10 Work Completed to Date $1,374,508.10 0% Retainage $0.00 Amount Paid to Date $1,245,758.18 Total Pay App #6 - Final $128,749.92 Agenda Item 6u. November 21, 2024 Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director Page 2 of 2 Reference: Mass Grading and Stormwater Pond for City Center Drive and 79th Place Engineer’s Recommendation We recommend approving Change Order 2 and Pay Application #6 - Final to Park Construction Company in the amount of $128,749.92 MASS GRADING AND STORMWATER POND FOR CITY CENTER DRIVE AND 79TH PLACE PAYMENT REQUEST FORM CONTRACTOR: PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE BID QUANTITY TOTAL BID PRICE QUANTITY CHANGE CHANGE IN PRICE FINAL QUANTITY FINAL PRICE BASE BID SCHEDULE BID SCHEDULE A 1 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 66,000.00$ 1 $66,000.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $66,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 3,540.00$ 1 $3,540.00 0.00 $0.00 1 $3,540.00 3 CLEARING ACRE 2,380.00$ 4.3 $10,234.00 2.52 $5,997.60 6.82 $16,231.60 4 GRUBBING ACRE 2,380.00$ 4.3 $10,234.00 2.52 $5,997.60 6.82 $16,231.60 5 CLEAR TREE TREE 144.00$ 5 $720.00 0.00 $0.00 5 $720.00 6 GRUB TREE TREE 61.80$ 5 $309.00 0.00 $0.00 5 $309.00 7 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (NON-STRUCTRUAL) (EV) (P)CU YD 7.00$ 41300 $289,100.00 0.00 $0.00 41300 $289,100.00 8 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (STRUCTURAL) (EV) (P)CU YD 3.95$ 46524 $183,769.80 0.00 $0.00 46524 $183,769.80 9 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (EV) (P)CU YD 11.50$ 25774 $296,401.00 0.00 $0.00 25774 $296,401.00 10 COMMON BORROW - ONSITE (EV) (P)CU YD 3.35$ 48518 $162,535.30 0.00 $0.00 48518 $162,535.30 11 STOCKPILE COMMON (CV)CU YD 3.15$ 4000 $12,600.00 0.00 $0.00 4000 $12,600.00 12 STOCKPILE TOPSOIL (CV)CU YD 3.15$ 3100 $9,765.00 0.00 $0.00 3100 $9,765.00 13 BOULDER RETAINING WALL LIN FT 160.00$ 170 $27,200.00 -170.00 -$27,200.00 0 $0.00 14 WETLAND BUFFER POSTS AND MONUMENTS EACH 227.00$ 26 $5,902.00 -1.00 -$227.00 25 $5,675.00 15 COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE CU YD 66.30$ 80 $5,304.00 -9.00 -$596.70 71 $4,707.30 16 MEDIUM FILTER AGGREGATE CU YD 66.30$ 80 $5,304.00 -30.00 -$1,989.00 50 $3,315.00 17 PREMIXED IRON/FINE FILTER AGGREGATE (MOD)CU YD 211.00$ 440 $92,840.00 -102.00 -$21,522.00 338 $71,318.00 18 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE IV (NON-WOVEN)SQ YD 3.35$ 696 $2,331.60 -50.00 -$167.50 646 $2,164.10 19 RANDOM RIPRAP, CLASS III CU YD 124.00$ 30 $3,720.00 0.00 $0.00 30 $3,720.00 20 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 76 SQ YD 21.60$ 100 $2,160.00 -45.00 -$972.00 55 $1,188.00 21 36" RCP CLASS V STORM SEWER LIN FT 289.00$ 88 $25,432.00 0.00 $0.00 88 $25,432.00 22 8" SOLID PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LIN FT 45.80$ 64 $2,931.20 0.00 $0.00 64 $2,931.20 23 6" SOLID PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LIN FT 45.60$ 5 $228.00 0.00 $0.00 5 $228.00 24 6" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LIN FT 35.00$ 367 $12,845.00 0.00 $0.00 367 $12,845.00 25 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 686.00$ 6 $4,116.00 2.00 $1,372.00 8 $5,488.00 26 36" RCP FLARED END AND TRASH GUARD EACH 6,850.00$ 1 $6,850.00 0.00 $0.00 1 $6,850.00 27 5' DIA OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE EACH 19,200.00$ 1 $19,200.00 0.00 $0.00 1 $19,200.00 28 24" HDPE STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 67.60$ 266 $17,981.60 -78.00 -$5,272.80 188 $12,708.80 29 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - MAINTAINED LUMP SUM 2,710.00$ 1 $2,710.00 0.00 $0.00 1 $2,710.00 30 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG - MAINTAINED LIN FT 3.00$ 1760 $5,280.00 -1760.00 -$5,280.00 0 $0.00 31 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 2.35$ 5276 $12,398.60 113.00 $265.55 5389 $12,664.15 32 MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 AND STRAW MULCH ACRE 618.00$ 23.4 $14,461.20 -11.90 -$7,354.20 11.5 $7,107.00 33 MNDOT SEED MIX 25-131 POUND 7.00$ 1746 $12,222.00 -1336.00 -$9,352.00 410 $2,870.00 34 MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 POUND 22.70$ 103 $2,338.10 -91.00 -$2,065.70 12 $272.40 35 MNDOT SEED MIX 34-171 POUND 92.80$ 3 $278.40 -3.00 -$278.40 0 $0.00 36 MNDOT SEED MIX 35-241 POUND 18.60$ 36 $669.60 -36.00 -$669.60 0 $0.00 37 SEEDING AND STRAW MULCH ACRE 495.00$ 23 $11,385.00 -21.70 -$10,741.50 1.3 $643.50 38 SEED AND CAT 25 BLANKET SQ YD 1.55$ 1800 $2,790.00 1857.00 $2,878.35 3657 $5,668.35 CO1.1 Indirects-Supervision-Bond-Survey-Mobilization LUMP SUM 25,550.00$ 1 $25,550.00 0.00 $0.00 1 $25,550.00 CO1.2 Inefficiencies (Common Excavation Crew)HOUR 1,425.00$ 22 $31,350.00 0.00 $0.00 22 $31,350.00 CO1.3 Excavate and Stockpile Building A CU YD 3.95$ 8380 $33,101.00 0.00 $0.00 8380 $33,101.00 CO1.4 Moisture Condition Stockpiled Materials CU YD 2.10$ 8380 $17,598.00 0.00 $0.00 8380 $17,598.00 TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT Park Construction Company Subtotal: $1,374,508.10 0% Retainage: $ - Total: $ 1,374,508.10 Minneapolis, MN 55432 COMPLETED TO DATE 1481 81st Ave NE GENERAL CONTRACTOR $1,374,508.10-$77,177.30$1,451,685.40 MASS GRADING AND STORMWATER POND FOR CITY CENTER DRIVE AND 79TH PLACE PAYMENT REQUEST FORM CONTRACTOR: PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE BASE BID SCHEDULE QTY PRICE QTY COST QTY COST BID SCHEDULE A 1 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1.00 66,000.00$ $66,000.00 1.00 66,000.00$ 0.45 45.0%0.45 29,700.00$ 0.55 55.0%0.55 $36,300.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 3,540.00$ $3,540.00 1 3,540.00$ 0.45 45.0%0.45 1,593.00$ 0.55 55.0%0.55 $1,947.00 3 CLEARING ACRE 6.82 2,380.00$ $16,231.60 6.82 16,231.60$ 3.17 73.7%5.03 11,962.69$ 1.13 26.3%1.79 $4,268.91 4 GRUBBING ACRE 6.82 2,380.00$ $16,231.60 6.82 16,231.60$ 3.17 73.7%5.03 11,962.69$ 1.13 26.3%1.79 $4,268.91 5 CLEAR TREE TREE 5 144.00$ $720.00 5 720.00$ 5.00 100.0%5 720.00$ - 0.0%0 $0.00 6 GRUB TREE TREE 5 61.80$ $309.00 5 309.00$ 5.00 100.0%5 309.00$ - 0.0%0 $0.00 7 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (NON-STRUCTRUAL) (EV) (P)CU YD 41300 7.00$ $289,100.00 41300 289,100.00$ 30,300.00 73.4%30314.2 212,199.40$ 11,000.00 26.6%10985.8 $76,900.60 8 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (STRUCTURAL) (EV) (P)CU YD 46524 3.95$ $183,769.80 46524 183,769.80$ 22,214.00 47.7%22191.95 87,658.19$ 24,310.00 52.3%24332.05 $96,111.61 9 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (EV) (P)CU YD 25774 11.50$ $296,401.00 25774 296,401.00$ 7,438.00 28.9%7448.69 85,659.89$ 18,336.00 71.1%18325.31 $210,741.11 10 COMMON BORROW - ONSITE (EV) (P)CU YD 48518 3.35$ $162,535.30 48518 162,535.30$ 10,493.00 21.6%10479.89 35,107.62$ 38,025.00 78.4%38038.11 $127,427.68 11 STOCKPILE COMMON (CV)CU YD 4000 3.15$ $12,600.00 4000 12,600.00$ 2,000.00 50.0%2000 6,300.00$ 2,000.00 50.0%2000 $6,300.00 12 STOCKPILE TOPSOIL (CV)CU YD 3100 3.15$ $9,765.00 3100 9,765.00$ 900.00 29.0%899 2,831.85$ 2,200.00 71.0%2201 $6,933.15 13 BOULDER RETAINING WALL LIN FT 160.00$ $0.00 -$ 170.00 100.0%0 -$ - 0.0%0 $0.00 14 WETLAND BUFFER POSTS AND MONUMENTS EACH 25 227.00$ $5,675.00 25 5,675.00$ 26.00 100.0%25 5,675.00$ - 0.0%0 $0.00 15 COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE CU YD 71 66.30$ $4,707.30 71 4,707.30$ 25.00 31.3%22.22 1,473.38$ 55.00 68.7%48.78 $3,233.92 16 MEDIUM FILTER AGGREGATE CU YD 50 66.30$ $3,315.00 50 3,315.00$ 25.00 31.3%15.65 1,037.60$ 55.00 68.7%34.35 $2,277.41 17 PREMIXED IRON/FINE FILTER AGGREGATE (MOD)CU YD 338 211.00$ $71,318.00 338 71,318.00$ 140.00 31.8%107.48 22,679.12$ 300.00 68.2%230.52 $48,638.88 18 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE IV (NON-WOVEN)SQ YD 646 3.35$ $2,164.10 646 2,164.10$ 219.00 31.5%203.49 681.69$ 477.00 68.5%442.51 $1,482.41 19 RANDOM RIPRAP, CLASS III CU YD 30 124.00$ $3,720.00 30 3,720.00$ 9.41 31.4%9.42 1,168.08$ 20.59 68.6%20.58 $2,551.92 20 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 76 SQ YD 55 21.60$ $1,188.00 55 1,188.00$ 31.38 31.4%17.27 373.03$ 68.62 68.6%37.73 $814.97 21 36" RCP CLASS V STORM SEWER LIN FT 88 289.00$ $25,432.00 88 25,432.00$ 27.61 31.4%27.63 7,985.65$ 60.39 68.6%60.37 $17,446.35 22 8" SOLID PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LIN FT 64 45.80$ $2,931.20 64 2,931.20$ 20.08 31.4%20.1 920.40$ 43.92 68.6%43.9 $2,010.80 23 6" SOLID PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LIN FT 5 45.60$ $228.00 5 228.00$ 1.57 31.4%1.57 71.59$ 3.43 68.6%3.43 $156.41 24 6" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LIN FT 367 35.00$ $12,845.00 367 12,845.00$ 115.15 31.4%115.24 4,033.33$ 251.85 68.6%251.76 $8,811.67 25 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 8 686.00$ $5,488.00 8 5,488.00$ 1.88 31.3%2.5 1,717.74$ 4.12 68.7%5.5 $3,770.26 26 36" RCP FLARED END AND TRASH GUARD EACH 1 6,850.00$ $6,850.00 1 6,850.00$ 0.31 31.0%0.31 2,123.50$ 0.69 69.0%0.69 $4,726.50 27 5' DIA OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE EACH 1 19,200.00$ $19,200.00 1 19,200.00$ 0.31 31.0%0.31 5,952.00$ 0.69 69.0%0.69 $13,248.00 28 24" HDPE STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 188 67.60$ $12,708.80 188 12,708.80$ 133.00 50.0%94 6,354.40$ 133.00 50.0%94 $6,354.40 29 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - MAINTAINED LUMP SUM 1 2,710.00$ $2,710.00 1 2,710.00$ 0.50 50.0%0.5 1,355.00$ 0.50 50.0%0.5 $1,355.00 30 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG - MAINTAINED LIN FT 3.00$ $0.00 -$ 880.00 50.0%0 -$ 880.00 50.0%0 $0.00 31 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 5389 2.35$ $12,664.15 5389 12,664.15$ 2,638.00 50.0%2694.5 6,332.08$ 2,638.00 50.0%2694.5 $6,332.07 32 MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 AND STRAW MULCH ACRE 11.5 618.00$ $7,107.00 11.5 7,107.00$ 10.80 46.2%5.31 3,283.43$ 12.60 53.8%6.19 $3,823.57 33 MNDOT SEED MIX 25-131 POUND 410 7.00$ $2,870.00 410 2,870.00$ 279.36 16.0%65.6 459.20$ 1,466.64 84.0%344.4 $2,410.80 34 MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 POUND 12 22.70$ $272.40 12 272.40$ 29.73 28.9%3.47 78.72$ 73.27 71.1%8.53 $193.68 35 MNDOT SEED MIX 34-171 POUND 92.80$ $0.00 -$ 3.00 100.0%0 -$ - 0.0%0 $0.00 36 MNDOT SEED MIX 35-241 POUND 18.60$ $0.00 -$ 36.00 100.0%0 -$ - 0.0%0 $0.00 37 SEEDING AND STRAW MULCH ACRE 1.3 495.00$ $643.50 1.3 643.50$ 10.70 46.5%1 299.23$ 12.30 53.5%1 $344.27 38 SEED AND CAT 25 BLANKET SQ YD 3657 1.55$ $5,668.35 3657 5,668.35$ 519.51 28.9%1056.87 1,638.15$ 1,280.49 71.1%2600.13 $4,030.20 CO1.1 Indirects-Supervision-Bond-Survey-Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 25,550.00$ $25,550.00 1 25,550.00$ - 0.0%0 -$ 1.00 100.0%1 $25,550.00 CO1.2 Inefficiencies (Common Excavation Crew)HOUR 22 1,425.00$ $31,350.00 22 31,350.00$ - 0.0%0 -$ 22.00 100.0%22 $31,350.00 CO1.3 Excavate and Stockpile Building A CU YD 8380 3.95$ $33,101.00 8380 33,101.00$ - 0.0%0 -$ 8,380.00 100.0%8380 $33,101.00 CO1.4 Moisture Condition Stockpiled Materials CU YD 8380 2.10$ $17,598.00 8380 17,598.00$ - 0.0%0 -$ 8,380.00 100.0%8380 $17,598.00 $561,696.67 $812,811.43 COMPLETED TO DATE CITY OF CORCORAN CITY QTY ALLOC FROM BID ST THERESE QTY ALLOC FROM BID TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $1,374,508.10 $1,374,508.10 ST THERESE Project No. 227704747 Application for Payment Form 00 62 76-1 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT FORM OWNER: City of Corcoran PROJECT: Mass Grading and Stormwater Pond for City Center Drive and 79th Place CONTRACTOR: Park Construction Company PAY ESTIMATE NO. 6 & FINAL Original Contract Amount $ .... 1,344,086.40 Contract Changes approved to Date (List Change Order Numbers) $ ...... 107,599.00 Revised Contract Price $ .... 1,451,685.40 Work Completed to Date (attached) $ .... 1,374,508.10 Retainage to Date, 0% $ ..................... 0 Work Completed to Date Less Retainage to Date $ .... 1,374,508.10 Total Amount Previously Certified $ .... 1,245,758.18 Payment Request This Estimate $ ...... 128,749.92 I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid. CONTRACTOR MASS GRADING AND STORMWATER POND FOR CITY CENTER DRIVE AND 79TH PLACE PAYMENT REQUEST FORM CONTRACTOR: PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE BASE BID SCHEDULE QTY PRICE QTY PRICE QTY PRICE BID SCHEDULE A 1 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 66,000.00$ $66,000.00 1.00 66,000.00$ 0.90 59,400.00$ 0.1 6,600.00$ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 3,540.00$ $3,540.00 1 3,540.00$ 1 3,540.00$ 0 -$ 3 CLEARING ACRE 4.3 2,380.00$ $10,234.00 6.82 16,231.60$ 6.82 16,231.60$ 0 -$ 4 GRUBBING ACRE 4.3 2,380.00$ $10,234.00 6.82 16,231.60$ 6.82 16,231.60$ 0 -$ 5 CLEAR TREE TREE 5 144.00$ $720.00 5 720.00$ 5 720.00$ 0 -$ 6 GRUB TREE TREE 5 61.80$ $309.00 5 309.00$ 5 309.00$ 0 -$ 7 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (NON-STRUCTRUAL) (EV) (P)CU YD 41300 7.00$ $289,100.00 41300 289,100.00$ 41300 289,100.00$ 0 -$ 8 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (STRUCTURAL) (EV) (P)CU YD 46524 3.95$ $183,769.80 46524 183,769.80$ 46524 183,769.80$ 0 -$ 9 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (EV) (P)CU YD 25774 11.50$ $296,401.00 25774 296,401.00$ 25744 296,056.00$ 30 345.00$ 10 COMMON BORROW - ONSITE (EV) (P)CU YD 48518 3.35$ $162,535.30 48518 162,535.30$ 48518 162,535.30$ 0 -$ 11 STOCKPILE COMMON (CV)CU YD 4000 3.15$ $12,600.00 4000 12,600.00$ 4000 12,600.00$ 0 -$ 12 STOCKPILE TOPSOIL (CV)CU YD 3100 3.15$ $9,765.00 3100 9,765.00$ 3100 9,765.00$ 0 -$ 13 BOULDER RETAINING WALL LIN FT 170 160.00$ $27,200.00 -$ 0 -$ 0 -$ 14 WETLAND BUFFER POSTS AND MONUMENTS EACH 26 227.00$ $5,902.00 25 5,675.00$ 0 -$ 25 5,675.00$ 15 COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE CU YD 80 66.30$ $5,304.00 71 4,707.30$ 0 -$ 71 4,707.30$ 16 MEDIUM FILTER AGGREGATE CU YD 80 66.30$ $5,304.00 50 3,315.00$ 0 -$ 50 3,315.00$ 17 PREMIXED IRON/FINE FILTER AGGREGATE (MOD)CU YD 440 211.00$ $92,840.00 338 71,318.00$ 0 -$ 338 71,318.00$ 18 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE IV (NON-WOVEN)SQ YD 696 3.35$ $2,331.60 646 2,164.10$ 0 -$ 646 2,164.10$ 19 RANDOM RIPRAP, CLASS III CU YD 30 124.00$ $3,720.00 30 3,720.00$ 30 3,720.00$ 0 -$ 20 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 76 SQ YD 100 21.60$ $2,160.00 55 1,188.00$ 0 -$ 55 1,188.00$ 21 36" RCP CLASS V STORM SEWER LIN FT 88 289.00$ $25,432.00 88 25,432.00$ 88 25,432.00$ 0 -$ 22 8" SOLID PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LIN FT 64 45.80$ $2,931.20 64 2,931.20$ 38 1,740.40$ 26 1,190.80$ 23 6" SOLID PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LIN FT 5 45.60$ $228.00 5 228.00$ 0 -$ 5 228.00$ 24 6" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LIN FT 367 35.00$ $12,845.00 367 12,845.00$ 0 -$ 367 12,845.00$ 25 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 6 686.00$ $4,116.00 8 5,488.00$ 1 686.00$ 7 4,802.00$ 26 36" RCP FLARED END AND TRASH GUARD EACH 1 6,850.00$ $6,850.00 1 6,850.00$ 1 6,850.00$ 0 -$ 27 5' DIA OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE EACH 1 19,200.00$ $19,200.00 1 19,200.00$ 1 19,200.00$ 0 -$ 28 24" HDPE STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 266 67.60$ $17,981.60 188 12,708.80$ 188 12,708.80$ 0 -$ 29 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - MAINTAINED LUMP SUM 1 2,710.00$ $2,710.00 1 2,710.00$ 1 2,710.00$ 0 -$ 30 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG - MAINTAINED LIN FT 1760 3.00$ $5,280.00 -$ 0 -$ 0 -$ 31 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 5276 2.35$ $12,398.60 5389 12,664.15$ 5389 12,664.15$ 0 -$ 32 MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 AND STRAW MULCH ACRE 23.4 618.00$ $14,461.20 11.5 7,107.00$ 11.5 7,107.00$ 0 -$ 33 MNDOT SEED MIX 25-131 POUND 1746 7.00$ $12,222.00 410 2,870.00$ 410 2,870.00$ 0 -$ 34 MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 POUND 103 22.70$ $2,338.10 12 272.40$ 0 -$ 12 272.40$ 35 MNDOT SEED MIX 34-171 POUND 3 92.80$ $278.40 -$ 0 -$ 0 -$ 36 MNDOT SEED MIX 35-241 POUND 36 18.60$ $669.60 -$ 0 -$ 0 -$ 37 SEEDING AND STRAW MULCH ACRE 23 495.00$ $11,385.00 1.3 643.50$ 1.3 643.50$ 0 -$ 38 SEED AND CAT 25 BLANKET SQ YD 1800 1.55$ $2,790.00 3657 5,668.35$ 2679 4,152.45$ 978 1,515.90$ 0 CO1.1 Indirects-Supervision-Bond-Survey-Mobilization LUMP SUM 1 25,550.00$ $25,550.00 1 25,550.00$ 1 25,550.00$ 0 -$ CO1.2 Inefficiencies (Common Excavation Crew)HOUR 22 1,425.00$ $31,350.00 22 31,350.00$ 22 31,350.00$ 0 -$ CO1.3 Excavate and Stockpile Building A CU YD 8380 3.95$ $33,101.00 8380 33,101.00$ 8380 33,101.00$ 0 -$ CO1.4 Moisture Condition Stockpiled Materials CU YD 8380 2.10$ $17,598.00 8380 17,598.00$ 8380 17,598.00$ 0 -$ Park Construction Company Subtotal: $1,374,508.10 Subtotal: $ 1,258,341.60 Subtotal: $ 116,166.50 0% Retainage: $ - 1% Retainage: $ 12,583.42 0% Retainage: $ - Total: $ 1,374,508.10 Total: $ 1,245,758.18 Total: $ 116,166.50 Minneapolis, MN 55432 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTSCOMPLETED TO DATE 1481 81st Ave NE GENERAL CONTRACTOR $1,258,341.60 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS CURRENT PAY REQUEST #6 OCT 2024 $116,166.50TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $1,451,685.40 $1,374,508.10 COMPLETED TO DATE PAYMENT REQUEST 6 Project No. 227704747 Change Order Form 00 63 63-1 CHANGE ORDER FORM Change Order No. 2 Date 10/11/2024 Agreement Date 8/12/2022 Name of Project: Mass Grading and Stormwater Pond for City Center Drive and 79th Place Owner: City of Corcoran Contractor: Park Construction Company The following changes are hereby made to the Contract Documents: Pay items (see attached) were revised at the request of St. Therese to reduce quantities to match the completed quantities . Justification: Pay items have been revised to constructed quantities to acknowledge the project is complete and rectify the contract to final quantities. Original Contract Price: $ 1,344,086.40 Current Contract Price adjusted to previous Change Order: $ 1,451,685.40 The Contract Price due to this Change Order will be decreased by $ 77,177.30 The new Contract Price including this Change Order will be $ 1,374,508.10 Original Contract-Required Completion Date: June 7, 2023 The Contract Time will be Increased by 0 Calendar days Revised Contract Substantial Completion Date adjusted to this Change Order: June 7, 2023 Item 6u.1. Project No. 227704747 Change Order Form 00 63 63-2 Approvals Required: To be effective, this Order must be approved by the Owner and the Contractor if it changes the scope of objective of the Project, or as may otherwise be required by the Supplemental General Conditions. Requested by: Steven Hegland, P.E. Ordered by: City of Corcoran Accepted by: (Contractor) END OF SECTION City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-132 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION HONORING OUTGOING COUNCILMEMBER JON BOTTEMA WHEREAS, Jon Bottema served as the City of Corcoran’s appointed Commissioner for the Elm Creek Watershed from 2013 until 2016; and WHEREAS, Jon Bottema was elected as a Councilmember at the November 8, 2016 General Election, and served on the City Council for a four-year term expiring December 31, 2020; and WHEREAS, Jon Bottema has served as the city’s representative for the Metropolitan Council’s Land Use Committee since 2019; and WHEREAS, Jon Bottema was re-elected as a Councilmember at the November 3, 2020 General Election for a second four-year term to the City Council; and WHEREAS, over the 11 years of service as Watershed Commissioner, Land Use Representative, and Councilmember, the City achieved many worthwhile and lasting accomplishments including: Updating Corcoran’s mission, adopting core strategies, short-term goals and action steps; Community development block grant for the construction of the Hope Center in Maple Hill Estates; Purchase of 60 acres of new parkland for the City and creation of a master plan for City Park; construction of Wildflower park, the City’s first new park in several decades; planning for the proposed Diamond Lake Regional Trail; Completion of a fire service comprehensive growth plan and Corcoran fire subcommittee recommendations; Guiding a crime, drug and safety committee which resulted in beginning a canine program and enhanced investigations and commercial vehicle enforcement; received recognition as a safe city from multiple organizations; Approving the remodel of City Hall accommodating the growing staff necessary for the City; Significant public infrastructure projects including the first public water tower and water treatment facility, I-94 Dayton Parkway Interchange, the downtown utility and street improvement project, and many other projects in coordination with development; Drafting of the 2030 and 2040 comprehensive plans which has guided decision making in the City for decades; Drafting and updating design guidelines for the City in key districts to ensure thoughtful development takes place; additional emphasis was given to guide the southeast district which includes plans for a new town center surrounding a town square park; Agenda Item 6v. City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-132 Page 2 of 3 Providing guidance to applicants on numerous and significant city land use applications; Increasing communication with an enhanced quarterly newsletter, social media presence, updated website, emergency warning technology, and an update of the City’s information technology systems and processes; Staffing improvements including a public works director, community development director, assistant city administrator, planner, recreation supervisor, construction services supervisor, permit technician, finance manager, accounting clerk, public works superintendent, public works operations supervisor, public works administrative assistant, deputy director of public safety, detective, two sergeants, public safety administrative manager, police department administrative assistant, and community service officer positions; Developing, and enhancing community programs such as the annual cleanup day, firearm safety program, truck safety seminar, shop with a cop, toy and food drive, and Night to Unite; Appointing numerous residents to commissions to ensure resident input on important topics for the city; Creation of the first mission, vision, and values for the City; continued annually refining the goals and objectives of the City to meet its needs and look to the future; City budgets which have enhanced services while protecting the residents from significant tax increases, an example of this was the 2021 tax rate which was the lowest tax rate since 2012, and continued efforts to maintain a flat tax rate; Reviewing and supporting many proposed developments to help shape the City of Corcoran, updating several zoning and subdivision ordinances, continued water supply planning, and conducted business through a pandemic; and Municipal operations during a pandemic; review the use of CARES Act funds and ensuring City operations continue to support the needs of residents; and A new city logo for the City of Corcoran that represents Corcoran’s heritage as a community; and WHEREAS, after 11 years of appointed and elected public service, the City of Corcoran wishes to recognize the time, energy, dedication, and leadership provided by Jon Bottema to the City of Corcoran. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Councilmember Jon Bottema is hereby honored for outstanding and distinguished service to the City of Corcoran and its residents. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-132 Page 3 of 3 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of December 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Deb Johnson – City Clerk STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 6w. Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Director Matt Gottschalk Topic: Police Department Taser Replacement Action Required: Authorization Summary: The police department utilizes the Axon Taser as a critical piece of safety equipment for the community and its officers. Over the years the city has maintained and replaced the Tasers as necessary to appropriately equip department staff. In January 2023, Axon debuted the new Taser 10 platform. Since that time, the department has continued equip staff with the legacy model Taser 7. Staff has received word that Axon will likely begin sunsetting the Taser 7 model in the coming years. Staff believes that now is the time to begin transitioning to the Taser 10 platform. The Taser 10 transition will require different training and supporting equipment. Axon has also changed their sales model to require a subscription for the new equipment (which includes replacement) rather than supporting the outright purchase. Staff plans to phase in this Taser transition by outfitting the 13 full-time Police Officers with the new Taser 10’s and continuing to outfit our part-time Police Officers, Police Reserves, and Community Service Officers with our current inventory of Taser 7’s. The remaining staff can be phased into the Taser 10 platform as the sunsetting equipment necessitates and the budget allows. By entering a five-year subscription, the City can save approximately $3,714 annually and $18,571 over the life of the five year agreement versus a year to year subscription. The annual subscription cost for 13 officers including Tasers, training equipment, and supporting hardware is $11,893.44, or $914.88 per officer per year. There is also a benefit to locking in the price, as the cost of this technology traditionally rises year over year. The $11,893.44 annual cost could increase as other staff are eventually added to the plan in future years as necessary. Staff continues to research other products as they come to market but at this time there is not a comparable product offering substantially similar performance. Staff has had the terms and conditions reviewed by the City Attorney. Financial/Budget: The annual cost of the Taser 10 transition is included in the proposed 2025 operating budget. The five-year agreement, as currently structured, carries an $11,893.44 annual cost and a total cost of $59,467.20 over the 5-year term. The annual cost may increase as other staff are eventually added. Staff Report—December 18, 2023 Council Meeting Prepared by Director Gottschalk Page 2 Recommendation: Authorize staff to enter into the attached 5-year quote and agreement with Axon Enterprise Inc. Council Action: Authorize staff to enter into the attached 5-year quote and agreement with Axon Enterprise Inc. Attachments: 1.Axon Enterprise, Inc. quote and agreement. Page 1 Q-560635-45628.898CS Q-560635-45628.898CS Issued: 12/02/2024 Quote Expiration: 12/20/2024 Estimated Contract Start Date: 03/01/2025 Account Number: 201903 Payment Terms: N30 Delivery Method: SHIP TO BILL TO SALES REPRESENTATIVE PRIMARY CONTACT Corcoran Police Dept. - MN 8200 County Road 116 Hamel, MN 55340-2100 USA Corcoran Police Dept. - MN 8200 County Road 116 Hamel MN 55340-2100 USA Email: Chandler Smith Phone: 480 - 716 - 7245 Email: chasmith@axon.com Fax: Peter Ekenberg Phone: Email: pekenberg@ci.corcoran.mn.us Fax: Quote Summary Discount Summary Program Length 60 Months Average Savings Per Year $3,714.36 TOTAL COST $59,467.20 ESTIMATED TOTAL W/ TAX $59,467.20 TOTAL SAVINGS $18,571.80 Axon Enterprise, Inc. 17800 N 85th St. Scottsdale, Arizona 85255 United States VAT: 86-0741227 Domestic: (800) 978-2737 International: +1.800.978.2737 Agenda Item 6w.1. Page 2 Q-560635-45628.898CS Payment Summary Date Subtotal Tax Total Feb 2025 $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Feb 2026 $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Feb 2027 $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Feb 2028 $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Feb 2029 $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Total $59,467.20 $0.00 $59,467.20 Page 3 Q-560635-45628.898CS Quote Unbundled Price:$78,039.00 Quote List Price:$63,367.20 Quote Subtotal:$59,467.20 Pricing All deliverables are detailed in Delivery Schedules section lower in proposal Item Description Qty Term Unbundled List Price Net Price Subtotal Tax Total Program C00010 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 13 60 $100.05 $81.24 $76.24 $59,467.20 $0.00 $59,467.20 Total $59,467.20 $0.00 $59,467.20 Delivery Schedule Hardware Bundle Item Description QTY Shipping Location Estimated Delivery Date BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100390 AXON TASER 10 - HANDLE - YELLOW CLASS 3R 13 2 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100393 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - LIVE DUTY BLACK 13 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100394 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - HALT TRAINING BLUE 4 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100395 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - LIVE TRAINING PURPLE 3 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100396 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - INERT RED 13 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 260 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 80 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100401 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - INERT 130 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100611 AXON TASER 10 - SAFARILAND HOLSTER - RH 13 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100623 AXON TASER - TRAINING - ENHANCED HALT SUIT V2 1 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 20018 AXON TASER - BATTERY PACK - TACTICAL 13 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 20018 AXON TASER - BATTERY PACK - TACTICAL 3 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 70033 AXON - DOCK WALL MOUNT - BRACKET ASSY 1 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 71019 AXON BODY - DOCK POWERCORD - NORTH AMERICA 1 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 74200 AXON TASER - DOCK - SIX BAY PLUS CORE 1 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 80087 AXON TASER - TARGET - CONDUCTIVE PROFESSIONAL RUGGEDIZED 1 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 80090 AXON TASER - TARGET FRAME - PROFESSIONAL 27.5 IN X 75 IN 1 1 02/01/2025 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 40 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 110 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 40 1 02/01/2027 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 100 1 02/01/2027 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 40 1 02/01/2028 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 110 1 02/01/2028 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 40 1 02/01/2029 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 100 1 02/01/2029 Software Bundle Item Description QTY Estimated Start Date Estimated End Date Page 4 Q-560635-45628.898CS Software Bundle Item Description QTY Estimated Start Date Estimated End Date BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 101180 AXON TASER - DATA SCIENCE PROGRAM 13 03/01/2025 02/28/2030 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 20248 AXON TASER - EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE 13 03/01/2025 02/28/2030 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 20248 AXON TASER - EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE 1 03/01/2025 02/28/2030 Services Bundle Item Description QTY BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100751 AXON TASER 10 - REPLACEMENT ACCESS PROGRAM - DUTY CARTRIDGE 13 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 101193 AXON TASER - ON DEMAND CERTIFICATION 1 Warranties Bundle Item Description QTY Estimated Start Date Estimated End Date BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 100704 AXON TASER 10 - EXT WARRANTY - HANDLE 13 02/01/2026 02/28/2030 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 80374 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - BATTERY PACK T7/T10 3 02/01/2026 02/28/2030 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 80374 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - BATTERY PACK T7/T10 13 02/01/2026 02/28/2030 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 1 02/01/2026 02/28/2030 Page 5 Q-560635-45628.898CS Shipping Locations Location Number Street City State Zip Country 1 8200 County Road 116 Hamel MN 55340-2100 USA 2 8200 County Road 116 Hamel MN 55340-2100 USA Payment Details Feb 2025 Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total Year 1 C00010 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 13 $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Total $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Feb 2026 Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total Year 2 C00010 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 13 $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Total $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Feb 2027 Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total Year 3 C00010 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 13 $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Total $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Feb 2028 Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total Year 4 C00010 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 13 $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Total $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Feb 2029 Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total Year 5 C00010 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION 13 $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Total $11,893.44 $0.00 $11,893.44 Page 6 Q-560635-45628.898CS Tax is estimated based on rates applicable at date of quote and subject to change at time of invoicing. If a tax exemption certificate should be applied, please submit prior to invoicing. Standard Terms and Conditions Axon Enterprise Inc. Sales Terms and Conditions Axon Master Services and Purchasing Agreement: This Quote is limited to and conditional upon your acceptance of the provisions set forth herein and Axon’s Master Services and Purchasing Agreement (posted at https://www.axon.com/sales-terms-and-conditions), as well as the attached Statement of Work (SOW) for Axon Fleet and/or Axon Interview Room purchase, if applicable. In the event you and Axon have entered into a prior agreement to govern all future purchases, that agreement shall govern to the extent it includes the products and services being purchased and does not conflict with the Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program Appendix as described below. ACEIP: The Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program Appendix, which includes the sharing of de-identified segments of Agency Content with Axon to develop new products and improve your product experience (posted at www.axon.com/legal/sales-terms-and-conditions), is incorporated herein by reference. By signing below, you agree to the terms of the Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program. Acceptance of Terms: Any purchase order issued in response to this Quote is subject solely to the above referenced terms and conditions. By signing below, you represent that you are lawfully able to enter into contracts. If you are signing on behalf of an entity (including but not limited to the company, municipality, or government agency for whom you work), you represent to Axon that you have legal authority to bind that entity. If you do not have this authority, please do not sign this Quote. Page 7 Q-560635-45628.898CS \s1\\d1\ Signature Date Signed 12/2/2024 City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-136 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: RESOLUTION APPOINTMENTS OF POSITIONS FOR THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized the positions listed in this resolution for hiring in 2024; WHERAS, the preferred candidates were identified and offered listed positions; WHEREAS, the City fosters a work environment that rewards performance and recognizes commitment to Corcoran’s mission, vision, and values in ways that better posture staff to support current needs and future growth of the City of Cocoran; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Corcoran City Council RESOLVES as follows: 1)Nalisha Williams is appointed as Assistant City Administrator effective June 24, 2024, at step 2 in Grade 15. 2)Danielle Hoffman is appointed as Police Officer effective July 22, 2024, at the starting step in Grade 11. 3)Samuel Mahr is appointed as Police Officer effective July 21, 2024, at the starting step Grade 11. 4)Reed Kottke is appointed as Accountant effective August 12, 2024, at the starting step in Grade 8. 5)Debra Johnson is appointed as City Clerk effective August 19, 2024, at the starting step in Grade 11. 6)Ryan Ganner is appointed as Human Resources Generalist effective September 16, 2024, at the starting step in Grade 11. 7)Karen Heiden is appointed as Deputy Clerk effective September 23, 2024, at the starting step in Grade 8. 8)Jeanene Heinecke is appointed as Police Technician on a temporary basis effective September 30, 2024, at the starting step in Grade 4. 9)Aaron Headrick is appointed as Communications Specialist effective October 28, 2024, at the starting step in Grade 10. 10)Lauren Letsche is appointed as Engineering Development Superintendent effective November 4, 2024, at step 1 in Grade 16. 11)Blake Kolles is appointed as Snowplow Operator, effective November 18, 2024, at the maximum rate for the Public Works seasonal grade. 12)Gary Lieder is appointed as Snowplow Operator, effective November 18, 2024, at the start rate for the Public Works seasonal grade. 13)Stephen Jordan is appointed as Snowplow Operator, effective November 18, 2024, at the maximum rate for the Public Works seasonal grade. 14)Cody Harff is appointed as Public Works Maintenance Worker, effective November 25, 2024, at the starting step in Grade 8. 15)Joshua Reisner is appointed as Community Service Officer, effective December 2, 2024, at the starting step in Grade 5. Agenda Item 6x. City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-136 Page 2 of 2 16) Joseph Pavey is appointed as Utility Superintendent, effective December 9, 2024, at the starting step in Grade 15. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of December, 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ City Seal Jay Tobin – City Administrator 1 From: Michelle Friedrich <mrfriedrich@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2024 12:54:58 PM To: Jessica Christensen Buck <jchristensenbuck@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Parks and Trails Commission This message was sent from outside of the organization. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source of this email and know the content is safe. Good afternoon Jessica, It is with a bit of sadness that I submit my resignation from the Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission effective December 18, 2024, after the December meeting. I am extremely excited to serve in another capacity as a Council member, but will miss the camaraderie with each person on the Parks and Trails Commission. I’ve truly appreciated all the dialogue and discussion we’ve had regarding the future of parks and trails in Corcoran. I’ve appreciated the opportunity to serve as co-chair under Chair Christenson’s leadership. My time on the Parks and Trails Commission has seen growth and forward momentum in the City Park design, the boardwalk, and parks policies in general. I will continue to bring forward and extend the ideas from the Parks and Trails Commission into Council discussions as a council member too. Thank you so much the experience as a commissioner. Kind regards, Michelle Friedrich Agenda Item 6y Page 1 of 4 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7a. City Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Natalie Davis McKeown Topic: Cannabis Regulation Code Amendments (City File No. 24-044) Action Required: Decision Review Deadline: January 1, 2025 1.Request: The Planning Commission is asked to host a public hearing on proposed City Code amendments regarding licensing of cannabis related businesses. The Planning Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the amendments specific to the Zoning Ordinance to allow cannabis businesses in appropriate zoning districts and outlining performance standards. 2.Background: In 2022, the Minnesota Legislature passed a bill permitting the sale and purchase of edibles and beverages that contain up to 5 milligrams of hemp-derived tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) per serving and 50 milligrams per package. In response, the City adopted Chapter 119 pertaining to Cannabis, Edible Cannabinoids, and Drug Paraphernalia. This allowed up to three licenses in the City within the City’s three dedicated commercial districts (Rural Commercial (CR), Neighborhood Commercial (C- 1), and Community Commercial (C-2)). Buffering requirements were applied in this chapter to prevent such licenses from being issued within 1,000 feet from schools, 500 feet from daycares, and 500 feet from parks with amenities regularly used by children (e.g., playgrounds, fields, etc.). In 2023, higher potency cannabis for adult recreational use was legalized by the State Legislature. This law granted the licensing authority to the state, but cities are still involved with the registration of cannabis retail businesses. The City enacted a moratorium to the maximum extent allowed by the new law to allow for review of the new regulations and to study appropriate regulatory measures. The moratorium expires on January 1, 2025. The proposed update to Chapter 119 and Zoning Ordinance updates are in response to the changes made in 2023. 3.Planning Commission Review The proposed business and zoning regulations related to Cannabis operations is scheduled for a public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting on 12/5/2024. Staff will provide supplemental information to update the staff report and agenda packet by Monday, 12/9/2024, regarding the recommendation from the Planning Commission. Page 2 of 4 4. Analysis The City Attorney drafted a repeal and replacement of Chapter 119 to fully capture all changes required of the City by the state as it relates to licensing registration of cannabis related businesses. The proposed restrictions in the draft Chapter 119 take into account feedback provided by City Council on November 25, 2024, and are believed to be as restrictive as recommended within the framework provided by the State. The City’s authority to add licensing requirements is restricted and a de facto ban is not allowed. The City does have authority to identify appropriate districts to allow different types of Cannabis businesses, and it is believed performance standards can be required as part of the City’s zoning authority. However, the product itself must be treated similar to other legal products. While the public is welcome to comment on the proposed changes to Chapter 119, the Planning Commission’s purview is limited to the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments. Prior to this update, Chapter 119 allowed up to 3 licenses for lower potency products to be issued within the City’s dedicated commercial districts. As part of the proposed draft to Chapter 119, up to 1 retail operation for higher potency products would be allowed in the City’s dedicated commercial districts with up to 2 more licenses to sell lower potency products allowed within the same commercial districts. The overall retail type operations would not exceed 3 such businesses consistent with what was adopted by the City in 2023. Additionally, there is a provision that if licensing of cannabis retailers (for higher potency products) exceeds 1 per 12,500 people in Hennepin County overall, the City can, and would, choose to deny an additional registration application within the City. Buffers to certain uses would still be applied to the maximum extent allowed by state law (1,000 feet from schools, 500 feet from daycares, 500 feet from residential treatment facilities, and 500 feet from parks with amenities frequented by children). The update also includes restrictions, to the maximum extent recommended by the City Attorney, on the hours of operation and temporary cannabis events. Consistent with the discussion held with Council on November 25, 2024, staff recommends allowing different business operations as a permitted use in at least one district while relying on performance standards to make the approval process as clear and objective as possible while making such uses fit within the surrounding area. The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments identify the following cannabis business types and appropriate districts: 1. Cannabis, retail, compliant with Corcoran Code Section 119.03-04. o Permitted use in CR, C-1, and C-2. 2. Lower-Potency Hemp Edible Retailers, compliant with Section 119.03. o Permitted use in CR, C-1, and C-2. 3. Cannabis, state licensed cultivation business with no retail component o Permitted use in Rural Residential Page 3 of 4 4. Cannabis, state licensed businesses with no retail component or outside cultivation o Permitted use in Business Park and Light Industrial (I-1) Additionally, the following performance standards within the Zoning Ordinance for such businesses are proposed: 1. Cannabis retail establishments can only operate between the hours of 10:00AM and 9:00PM. 2. Establishments must implement comprehensive security measures, including but not limited to: a. Security cameras covering all areas of the premises, both interior and exterior. b. Alarm system monitored 24 hours per day, 7 days per week by a licensed security company. c. Secure storage areas for all cannabis products. d. Outdoor cultivation areas as allowed in the Rural Residential district must be secured by a privacy fence of at least 6’ tall and 80% opacity. i. Fences may not include razor or concertina wire. ii. Access gates must be equipped with a locking device, be self- closing, and have a self-latching device. 3. Adequate ventilation systems must be installed to ensure no odor is detectable from the exterior of the building or from adjacent properties. For outdoor cultivation areas, effective odor control measures must be in place to ensure no detectable odor extends beyond the premises. 4. Establishments must have a plan for the disposal of cannabis waste that complies with state regulations and prevents access by unauthorized individuals. 5. The operation of a cannabis business is prohibited within 1,000 feet of a school, or 500 feet of a day care, residential treatment facility, or an attraction within a public park that is regularly used by minors, including a playground or athletic field. 6. Accessory structures utilized for cultivation operations in the Rural Residential district are subject to a minimum setback of 100 feet from all property lines. 7. All signage must comply with Corcoran City Code and must not depict cannabis leaves, use slang terms for cannabis, or appeal to minors. 5. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendments to Chapter 119 and Title X as it relates to Cannabis regulations. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2024-538 Amending Chapter 119 and Title X of the City Code as it Relates to Cannabis Businesses Page 4 of 4 2. Summary Ordinance 2024-539 for Publication 3. Resolution 2024-133 with Findings of Fact for Ordinance 2024-538 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 1 of 14 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 119: CANNABIS, EDIBLE CANNABINOIDS, AND DRUG PARAPHERNALIA AND TITLE X: ZONING ORDINANCE (CITY FILE 24- 044) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendment of the City Code. The existing text of City Code Chapter 119 is repealed in its entirety and replaced as follows: CHAPTER 119: Cannabis and Cannabis Business Regulations 119.01: Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to implement the provisions of Minn. Stat. Ch. 342, and certain related regulations to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the city of Corcoran by regulating cannabis use and cannabis businesses within the legal limits of the city. 119.02: Definitions. Unless otherwise noted or specifically defined in this section, words and phrases contained in M.S. § 342.01, as it may be amended from time to time, and the rules promulgated pursuant to any of these acts, shall have the same meanings in this ordinance. CANNABIS CULTIVATION. A cannabis business licensed to grow cannabis plants within the approved amount of space from seed or immature plant to mature plant, harvest cannabis flower from mature plant, package and label immature plants and seedlings and cannabis flower for sale to other cannabis businesses, transport cannabis flower to a cannabis manufacturer located on the same premises, and perform other actions approved by the office. CANNABIS RETAIL BUSINESSES. A state-licensed retail location and the retail location(s) of a mezzobusiness(es) with a retail operations endorsement, microbusiness(es) with a retail operations endorsement, medical combination business(es) operating a retail location, excluding lower-potency hemp edible retailers. CANNABIS RETAILER. Any person, partnership, firm, corporation, or association, foreign or domestic, selling cannabis product to a consumer and not for the purpose of resale in any form. CERTIFIED MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL. An individual who holds a valid and active license to practice medicine or provide healthcare services within the State of Minnesota, as issued by the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice, or other relevant state licensing authorities. This includes, but is not limited to, licensed physicians, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), physician assistants (PAs) or other healthcare professionals recognized by the State of Minnesota as being authorized to conduct medical evaluations, provide medical advice and respond to medical emergencies. DAYCARE. A location licensed with the Minnesota Department of Human Services to provide Attachment Item 7a.1. City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 2 of 14 the care of a child in a residence outside the child's own home for gain or otherwise, on a regular basis, for any part of a 24-hour day. DRUG PARAPHERNALIA. All equipment, products, and materials of any kind, except those used in conjunction with permitted uses of controlled substances pursuant to state law, which are knowingly or intentionally used primarily in (1) manufacturing a controlled substance other than cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products, (2) injecting, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled substance other than cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products, or (3) enhancing the effect of a controlled substance other than cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products. DRUG PARAPHERNALIA does not include the possession, manufacture, delivery, or sale of: (1) hypodermic syringes or needles or any instrument or implement which can be adapted for subcutaneous injections; or (2) products that detect the presence of fentanyl or a fentanyl analog in a controlled substance. LOWER-POTENCY HEMP EDIBLE. As defined under M.S. § 342.01, subd. 50, as it may be amended from time to time. LOWER-POTENCY HEMP EDIBLE RETAILER. A business which sells Lower-Potency Hemp Edibles but which is not a Cannabis Retailer, as defined by this Chapter. OFFICE OF CANNABIS MANAGEMENT. Minnesota Office of Cannabis Management, referred to as "OCM" in this ordinance. PLACE OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION. A business, accommodation, refreshment, entertainment, recreation or transportation facility of any kind, whether licensed or not, whose goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages or accommodations are extended, offered, sold, or otherwise made available to the public. PRELIMINARY LICENSE APPROVAL. OCM pre-approval for a cannabis business license for applicants who qualify under M.S. § 342.17, as it may be amended from time to time. PUBLIC PLACE. A public park or trail, public street or sidewalk; any enclosed, indoor area used by the general public, including, but not limited to, restaurants, bars, any other food or liquor establishment, hospitals, nursing homes, auditoriums, arenas, gyms, meeting rooms, common areas of rental apartment buildings and other places of public accommodation. RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT FACILITY. A facility as defined under M.S. § 245.462, subd. 23, as it may be amended from time to time. RETAIL REGISTRATION. An approved registration issued by the city to a state-licensed cannabis retail business, registering a single specified retail location within the city limits. SCHOOL. A public school as defined under M.S. § 120A.05, as it may be amended from time City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 3 of 14 to time, or a nonpublic school that must meet the reporting requirements under M.S. § 120A.24, as it may be amended from time to time. STATE LICENSE. An approved license issued by the Office of Cannabis Management to a cannabis business. 119.03 Registration of Cannabis Businesses. A.Consent to Registering of Cannabis Businesses. No individual or entity may operate a state-licensed cannabis retail business or lower-potency hemp edible retail business within the corporate limits of the city without first registering with the city. With the exception of the limitations set forth in §119.03 (G)(1), all requirements of this Section 119.03 shall apply to lower-potency hemp edible retailers the same as they do to cannabis retail businesses. B.Compliance Checks Prior to Retail Registration. 1.The city may conduct a preliminary compliance check prior to issuance of a cannabis retail business registration to ensure compliance with local ordinances. 2.Pursuant to M.S. Ch. 342, within 30 days of receiving a copy of a state license application from OCM, the city shall certify on a form provided by OCM whether a proposed cannabis retail business complies with local zoning ordinances and, if applicable, whether the proposed business complies with the state fire code and building code. C.Registration and Application Procedure. 1.Fees. a.The city shall not charge an application fee. b.A registration fee, as established under the city's fee schedule, shall be charged to applicants depending on the type of retail business license applied for. (1)An initial retail registration fee shall not exceed $500 or half the amount of an initial state license fee under M.S. § 342.11, as it may be amended from time to time, whichever is less. The initial registration fee shall include the initial retail registration fee and the first annual renewal fee. (2)Any renewal retail registration fee imposed by the city shall be charged at the time of the second renewal and each subsequent renewal thereafter. A renewal retail registration fee shall not exceed $1,000 or half the amount of a renewal state license fee under M.S. § 342.11, as it may be amended from City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 4 of 14 time to time, whichever is less. (3)A medical combination business operating an adult-use retail location may only be charged a single registration fee, not to exceed the lesser of a single retail registration fee, defined under this section, of the adult-use retail business. 2.Application submittal. a.The city shall issue a retail registration to a state-licensed cannabis retail business that adheres to the requirements of M.S. § 342.22 and this Chapter, as they may be amended from time. b.An applicant for a retail registration shall fill out an application form, as provided by the city. Said form shall include, but is not limited to: (1)Full name of property owner and applicant; (2)Address, email address, and telephone number of the applicant; (3)The address and parcel ID for the property which the retail registration is sought; (4)Certification that the applicant complies with the requirements of local ordinances established pursuant to M.S. 342.13, as it may be amended from time to time. c.The applicant shall include with the form: (1)The application fee as required in Paragraph C,1; (2)A copy of the state license application form and materials submitted to OCM. (3)A copy of a valid state license or written notice of OCM license preapproval. d.Once an application is considered complete, the city shall inform the applicant as such, process the application fees, and forward the application to the City Council for approval or denial. e.The application fee shall be non-refundable once processed. 3.Application approval. City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 5 of 14 a.A state-licensed cannabis retail business application shall not be approvedif the cannabis retail business would exceed the maximum number ofregistered cannabis retail businesses permitted under Paragraph G. b.A state-licensed cannabis retail business application shall not be approved or renewed if the applicant is unable to meet the requirements of this ordinance. c.A state-licensed cannabis retail business application that meets the requirements of this ordinance shall be approved. 4.Annual compliance checks. a.The city shall complete at least one unannounced compliance check per calendar year of every cannabis business to assess if the business meets age verification requirements, as required under M.S. § 342.22, subd. 4(b) and M.S. § 342.24, as they may be amended from time to time, and these ordinances. b.Age verification compliance checks shall involve persons at least 17 years of age but under the age of 21 who, with the prior written consent of a person or guardian if the person is under the age of 18, attempt to purchase adult-use cannabis flower, adult-use cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products under the direct supervision of a law enforcement officer. 5.Location change. A state-licensed cannabis retail business shall be required to submit a new application for registration under Paragraph C,2 if it seeks to relocate to a new location still within the legal boundaries of the city. That application for registration at the new location shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph G. D.Renewal of registration. The city shall renew an annual registration of a state-licensed cannabis retail business at the same time OCM renews the cannabis retail business' license. A state-licensed cannabis retail business shall apply to renew registration on a form established by the city and pay the renewal fee for the registration as established in the city's fee schedule. E.Transfer of registration. A cannabis retail registration issued under this ordinance shall not be transferred. F.Suspension of registration. 1.When suspension is warranted. The city may suspend a cannabis retail business's registration if it violates the ordinance of the city or poses an immediate threat to the health or safety of the public. The city shall immediately notify the cannabis retail business in writing the grounds for the suspension. 2.Notification to OCM. The city shall immediately notify the OCM in writing the City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 6 of 14 grounds for the suspension. OCM will provide the city and cannabis business retailer a response to the complaint within seven calendar days and perform any necessary inspections within 30 calendar days. 3.Length of suspension. The suspension of a cannabis retail business registration may be for up to 30 calendar days, unless OCM suspends the license for a longer period. The city may require receipt of a determination from OCM before reinstating a registration. The business may not make sales to customers if their registration is suspended. The city may reinstate a registration if it determines that the violations have been resolved. The city shall reinstate a registration if OCM determines that the violation(s) have been resolved. G.Limitation on Number of Registrations. 1.The city shall limit the number of cannabis retail businesses to the lowest number of registrations permitted by M.S. § 342.13, as it may be amended from time to time, and this Chapter. The city shall allow no greater than one registration of a single retail location per 12,500 residents within the city limits which is not an operation owned by the city. In the event an application for registration seeks to locate within the corporate boundaries of the city and the County in which the proposed operations site is located has reached the threshold of one active registration for every 12,500 residents, the city shall not issue a registration to an operation which is not owned by the city. This limitation shall not apply to lower-potency hemp edible retailers, as defined in this Chapter. 2.The city shall limit the number of lower-potency hemp edible retailers to no more than two registrations of single retail locations within the corporate boundaries of the city. However, the limit set forth in this Section 119.03 (G)(2) shall not apply to a cannabis retail business legally operating within the city which is also licensed to sell lower-potency hemp edibles. H.Inspections. City officials and law enforcement have the right to inspect the premises at any time to ensure compliance with all regulations. 119.04 Restrictions on Issuance. A.No state-licensed cannabis business shall be granted within 1,000 feet of a school. The distance is to be measured from the closest side of the school to the closest side of the structure on the premises within which cannabis is to be sold. B.No state-licensed cannabis business shall be granted within 500 feet of a day care, a residential treatment facility and/or an attraction within a public park that is regularly used by minors, including a playground or athletic field. The distance is to be measured from the closest side of the day care, residential treatment facility or public park attraction regularly used by minors to the closest side of the structure on the premises within which cannabis is to be sold. C.Pursuant to M.S. § 462.367, subd. 14, as it may be amended from time to time, City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 7 of 14 nothing in this Section 119.04 shall prohibit an active cannabis business or a cannabis business seeking registration from continuing operation at the same site if a school, daycare, residential treatment facility and/or an attraction within a public park that is regularly used by minors moves within the minimum buffer zone. D.In the event an applicant seeks registration for a business to be located within a zoning district which requires a conditional use permit to permit the business, the City shall deny the application as not compliant with local zoning if the applicant has not obtained a valid conditional use permit for the use, from the city. 119.05 Hours of Operation. Cannabis businesses are limited to retail sale of cannabis, cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles or hemp-derived consumer products between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. 119.06 Temporary Cannabis Events. A.License required. A license or permit is required to be issued and approved by the city prior to holding a Temporary Cannabis Event. B.Registration and application procedure. A registration fee, as established in the city fee schedule, shall be charged to applicants for Temporary Cannabis Events. C.Application submittal and review. The city shall require an application for Temporary Cannabis Events. 1.An applicant for a retail registration shall fill out an application form, as provided by the city. The form shall include, but is not limited to: a.Full name of the property owner and applicant; b.Address, email address and telephone number of applicant; c.The address at which the event will be held; and d.Other information required by the Administrator or designee. 2.The applicant shall include with the form the application fee as required under Paragraph B and a copy of the OCM cannabis event license application, submitted pursuant to M.S. § 342.39, subd. 2, as it may be amended from time to time. 3.The application shall be submitted to the Administrator or designee, for review. If the Administrator determines that a submitted application is incomplete, he/she shall return the application to the applicant with the notice of deficiencies. 4.Once an application is considered complete, the Administrator shall inform the applicant of such, process the application fees and forward the application to the City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 8 of 14 city council for approval or denial. The application fee shall be non-refundable once processed. 5.The application for a license for a Temporary Cannabis Event shall meet the following standards: a.Comply with buffer standards applicable to a state-licensed cannabis business as set forth in Section 119.04 (A) and (B). b.Security requirements. (1)A minimum of two licensed peace officers or licensed security guards per 100 attendees must be present at all times. (2)The event area must be equipped with 24/7 video surveillance covering all entrances, exits, and key areas. (3)Secure fencing and controlled entry points must be established to ensure only authorized individuals enter the event area. c.Operational standards. (1)Noise levels must not exceed the limits set forth in City Code. (2)Effective odor control measures must be in place to ensure no detectable odor extends beyond the event premises. d.Health and safety standards. (1)At least one certified medical professional, as defined in this Chapter, must be present on-site at all times. (2)Adequate sanitation facilities must be provided, including restrooms and handwashing stations, as determined by the city's Building Official. (3)A comprehensive waste management plan must be implemented to handle all event-related waste. e.Inspections. City officials and law enforcement have the right to inspect the event at any time to ensure compliance with all regulations. f.Event Hours. A Temporary Cannabis Event shall only be held between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 9 of 14 g.On-Site Consumption Prohibited. On-site consumption shall not be permitted at a Temporary Cannabis Event within the city. h.Location of Events. A Temporary Cannabis Event which includes cannabis retail may only be held at a location which is within a zoning district which permits cannabis retail operation and subject to the provisions of Section 10-604. 119.07 Civil Penalties. A.Any state-licensed cannabis retail business that sells to a customer or patient without valid retail registration shall incur a civil penalty of $2,000 for each violation. B.Subject to M.S. § 342.22, subd. 5(e), the city may impose a civil penalty of $500 for the first violation of this chapter, $1,000 for the second violation of this chapter within a 36 month period, and $2,000 for the third and subsequent violations within a 36 month period. 119.08 Public Use of Cannabis and Lower-Potency Hemp Edibles Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to use cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products as each is defined by state law, in a public place within the City of Corcoran. For the purposes of this Section, “public place” shall not include: A.A private residence, including the curtilage or yard of the same; B.Private property not generally accessible by the public, unless the person is explicitly prohibited from consuming cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp- derived consumer products on the property by the owner of the property; or C.The premises of an establishment licensed to permit on-site consumption, provided the use complies with the on-site consumption permitted and this Chapter. On-site consumption shall not be permitted at Temporary Cannabis Events within the city. Any violation of this Section shall be a petty misdemeanor. 119.09 Possession of Drug Paraphernalia Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to use or possess drug paraphernalia as defined in this Chapter. SECTION 2. Amendment of the City Code. The existing text of City Code Title X, Section 1040.030 Rural Residential (RR), Subd. 2 is hereby amended by adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. A.Agriculture and Tree Farms. City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 10 of 14 B.Cannabis, state licensed cultivation business with no retail component compliant with Corcoran Code Section 119 and 1060.120. C.Dwelling, Single Family Detached. D.Parks, playgrounds, trails, other recreational facilities of a non-commercial nature and directly related buildings and structures. E.Residential facility in a single family detached dwelling, serving 6 or fewer individuals and licensed by the State. F.Seasonal Product Stands. SECTION 3. Amendment of the City Code. The existing text of City Code Title X, Section 1040.090 Rural Commercial (CR), Subd. 2 is hereby amended by adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. A.Automobile Retail (tires, batteries, etc. No body work or repair work). B.Cannabis, retail, compliant with Corcoran Code Section 119.03-04 and 1060.120. C.Lower Potency Hemp Edible Retailers, compliant with Corcoran Code Section 119.03 and 1060.120. D.Civic Buildings, such as City Hall, libraries, fire stations, etc. E.Day Care Facilities, Commercial. F.Offices, medical and professional. G.Retail goods and service uses of a similar nature. SECTION 4. Amendment of the City Code. The existing text of City Code Title X, Section 1040.100 C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial), Subd. 2 is hereby amended by adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. A.Bakery, retail. B.Banks, savings and loan, credit unions and other financial institutions, with or without drive-through. C.Barbers, Beauty Shops and similar personal service uses. D.Cannabis, retail, compliant with Corcoran Code Section 119.03-04 and 1060.120. E.Lower Potency Hemp Edible Retailers, compliant with Corcoran Code Section 119.03 and 1060.120. F.Civic Buildings, such as City Hall, libraries, fire stations, etc. G.Copy/print shop. H.Day Care Facilities, Commercial. I.Dry cleaning and laundry pick-up, incidental pressing and repair without dry cleaning processing. J.Offices, medical and professional. K.Public and Private Clubs and Lodges. L.Restaurants and cafes (without drive-through). City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 11 of 14 M.Retail goods and service uses of a similar nature within a fully enclosed building (without drive-through and not to exceed 50,000 square feet). N.Taverns. SECTION 5. Amendment of the City Code. The existing text of City Code Title X, Section 1040.110 C-2 (Community Commercial), Subd. 2 is hereby amended by adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. A.Bakery, retail. B.Banks, savings and loan, credit unions and other financial institutions, with or without drive-through. C.Barbers, Beauty Shops and similar personal service uses. D.Cannabis, retail, compliant with Corcoran Code Section 119.03-04 and 1060.120. E.Lower Potency Hemp Edible Retailers, compliant with Corcoran Code Section 119.03 and 1060.120. F.Civic Buildings, such as City Hall, libraries, fire stations, etc. G.Day Care Facilities, Commercial. H.Department Stores. I.Drug Stores, Variety Stores, etc. J.Dry cleaning and laundry pick-up, incidental pressing and repair without dry cleaning processing. K.Funeral Homes and Mortuaries. L.Grocery Stores (not to exceed 50,000 square feet). M.Hardware Stores. N.Hobby and Craft Stores. O.Home Furniture and Home Furnishing Stores. P.Household Appliance Stores. Q.Laundromats. R.Liquor – Off-sale/On-sale. S.Offices, medical and professional. T.Public and Private Clubs and Lodges. U.Restaurants and cafes (without drive-through). V.Retail goods and service uses of a similar nature. W.Sporting Goods and similar retail sales. X.Tailoring services, shoe repair and similar services. Y.Taverns. SECTION 6. Amendment of the City Code. The existing text of City Code Title X, Section 1040.120 BP (Business Park), Subd. 2 is hereby amended by adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 12 of 14 A.Banks, savings and loan, credit unions and other financial institutions, with or without drive-through. B.Cannabis, state licensed businesses with no retail or outdoor cultivation component compliant with Corcoran Code Section 119 and 1060.120. C.Civic buildings, such as City Hall, libraries, fire stations, etc. D.Commercial printing establishments. E.Conference centers and reception halls. F.Essential services and structures. G.Laboratories/research facilities. H.Manufacturing or assembly of products that produce no exterior noise, glare, fumes, obnoxious products, byproducts, or wastes or creates other objectionable impact on the environment. I.Offices, medical and professional. J.Office/Warehouse. K.Radio and television stations or studios. L.Technical, vocational, business and college/university satellite facilities/schools. M.Warehousing and indoor storage used in conjunction with offices or manufacturing facilities. N.Wholesale Showrooms. SECTION 7. Amendment of the City Code. The existing text of City Code Title X, Section 1040.125 I-1 (Light Industrial), Subd. 2 is hereby amended by adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. A.Automotive detailing shops. B.Cannabis, state licensed businesses with no retail or outdoor cultivation component compliant with Corcoran Code Section 119 and 1060.120. C.Civic buildings, such as City Hall, libraries, fire stations, etc. D.Commercial printing establishments. E.Contractors Operations F.Equipment rental. G.Indoor sports and recreation (commercial) provided the structure and use is located at least one hundred feet (100’) from any residential zoning district. H.Laboratories/research facilities. I.Manufacturing or assembly of products that produce no exterior noise, glare, fumes, obnoxious products, byproducts, or wastes or creates other objectionable impact on the environment. J.Lumber yards/building material sales. K.Offices, medical and professional. L. Office/Warehouse. M.Printing and publishing. N.Radio and television stations or studios. O.Recycling facility – indoor. P.Warehousing/distribution and indoor storage. City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 13 of 14 Q.Wholesale Showrooms. SECTION 8. Amendment of the City Code. The existing text of City Code Title X, is hereby amended by adding the underlined material as follows: Section 1060.120 Cannabis Businesses A.Cannabis and Hemp Business Activities 1.Cannabis retail establishments can only operate between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. 2. Establishments must implement comprehensive security measures, including but not limited to: a.Security cameras covering all areas of the premises, both interior and exterior. b.Alarm system monitored 24 hours per day, 7 days per week by a licensed security company. c.Secure storage areas for all cannabis products. d.Outdoor cultivation areas as allowed in the Rural Residential district must be secured by a privacy fence of at least 6’ tall and 80% opacity. (1)Fences may not include razor or concertina wire. (2)Access gates must be equipped with a locking device, be self- closing, and have a self-latching device. 3.Adequate ventilation systems must be installed to ensure no odor is detectable from the exterior of the building or from adjacent properties. For outdoor cultivation areas, effective odor control measures must be in place to ensure no detectable odor extends beyond the premises. 4. Establishments must have a plan for the disposal of cannabis waste that complies with state regulations and prevents access by unauthorized individuals. 5.The operation of a cannabis business is prohibited within 1,000 feet of a school, or 500 feet of a day care, residential treatment facility, or an attraction within a public park that is regularly used by minors, including a playground or athletic field. 6.Accessory structures utilized for cultivation operations in the Rural Residential district are subject to a minimum setback of 100 feet from all property lines. 7.All signage must comply with Corcoran City Code and must not depict City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota December 12, 2024 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 Page 14 of 14 cannabis leaves, use slang terms for cannabis, or appeal to minors. SECTION 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 12th day of December 2024. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: City Seal Debra Johnson – City Clerk City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-539 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2024-538 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF TITLE X (ZONING ORDINANCE) AND TITLE XI (BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO CANNABIS, EDIBLE CANNABINOIDS, AND DRUG PARAPHERNALIA (CITY FILE 24-044) Title X and Title XI of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended to address business and zoning regulations for cannabis use, businesses, and operations within the Zoning Ordinance and Business Regulations of the Corcoran City Code. A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of December 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor City Seal ATTEST: _______________________________________ Debra Johnson - City Clerk Attachment Item 7a.2. City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-133 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Nichols Seconded By: Vehrenkamp APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 119: CANNABIS, EDIBLE CANNABINOIDS, AND DRUG PARAPHERNALIA AND TITLE X: ZONING ORDINANCE AS IT RELATES TO CANNABIS REGULATIONS (CITY FILE NO. 24-044) WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute 342 establishes a regulatory framework for the state’s new cannabis industry and legalizes adult-use cannabis in Minnesota, and; WHEREAS, Staff proposes updates to Chapter 119 and Title X to address the City’s authority as it relates to registration of businesses, zoning, and cannabis use, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the ordinance amendments at a duly called Public Hearing and recommended approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the amendments to regulate Cannabis operations and use throughout the City, based on the following findings and conditions: 1.The ordinance amendments have been considered in relation to available guidance for local government authorities. 2.The ordinance amendments regulate businesses, operations, and adult-use to the maximum extent recommended without creating a conflict with Minnesota State Statute 342. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of December 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor City Seal ATTEST: ___________________________________ Debra Johnson – City Clerk Attachement Item 7a.3. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 8a. Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Deb Johnson, City Clerk Topic: Public Hearing – St. Therese Liquor License Action Required: Approval Summary: St. Therese Communities, DBA St. Therse of Corcoran, LLC has submitted an application and paid the fee for an a On-Sale Wine and 3.2% Liquor License with Sunday Sales for their location at 19800 78th Place, Corcoran. The investigations on the Liquor License have been completed by the Corcoran Police Department and the application has been reviewed and approved by the City Clerk. Recommendation: Authorize staff to Approve Resolution 2024-129 Granting an On Sale Wine and 3.2% with Sunday Sales Liquor License to Saint Therese Communities, DBA Saint Therese of Corcoran, LLC. Council Action: Authorize staff to Approve Resolution 2024-129 Granting an On Sale Wine and 3.2% with Sunday Sales Liquor License to Saint Therese Communities, DBA Saint Therese of Corcoran, LLC. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2024-129 2. Copy of Application 3. Copy of Liability Insurance City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-129 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN ON SALE WINE AND 3.2% LIQUOR LICENSE WITH SUNDAY SALES FOR SAINT THERESE COMMUNITIES DBA SAINT THERESE OF CORCORAN, 19800 79TH PLACE WHEREAS, Saint Therese Communities, dba Saint Therese of Corcoran, has submitted an application for On Sale Wine and 3.2% Liquor License with Sunday Sales for 19800 79th Place for the remainder of the License year 2024-25, ending June 30th, 2025; and WHEREAS, Corcoran Police Department has completed its investigation and filed its report and has been reviewed by the City Clerk with the City Council; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Public Hearing has been published and a Public Hearing held by the City Council at 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, December 12, 2024, to allow public comment on said application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Corcoran does hereby grant an On Sale Wine and 3.2% with Sunday Liquor License to Saint Therese Communities, dba Saint Therese of Corcoran, conditioned on the continuous compliance with all Federal, State, County and City Liquor and Health Laws. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of December 2024. Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: City Seal Debra Johnson – City Clerk Page 1 of 1 Attachment Item 8a.1. ► RECEIVED◄ NOV 1 9 2027 COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 1687498086 REVISION NUMBER· CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Corcoran ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran MN 55340 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE &J ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD SUBR POLICY JECT LOG I- AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY OWNED COMBINEDSINGLELIMIT /Ea accident) I- HIRED I- AUTOS $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Aggregale Limit 10/2/2024 LL0996420 Liability A OTH- N/A If yes, describe under YIN □ (Mandatory In NH) WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE OCCUR MADE H EXCESS LIAB $ accidenll DAMAGE $ OCCURRENCE RAL LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENE LIMITS POLICY EXP IMMIDD/YYYYl POLICYEFF ADDL INSR LTR I DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) 10/16/2024 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC 6160 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis MN 55416 2 r cT Ally Thorsen /Mr Mn Ext\·I /A/C No\: PHONE FAX iiMl ss: Ally.Thorsen@marshmma.com INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A: Star Insurance Company 18023 INSURED SAINTTHERE1 Saint Therese 1660 S. Hwy 100, Suite 100 St. Louis Park MN 55416 INSURER B: INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: Item 8a.3. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 8b. Council Meeting December 12, 2024 Prepared By Jay Tobin Topic 2025 Final General Fund Budget, Property Tax Levy, CIP, and Wage Schedule Action Required Approval Summary Annually the City Council adopts a budget and property tax levy for the City. The budget and levy fund the operations and debt service of the City. The 2025 budget and levy have been discussed at six public meetings prior to the formal public hearing held at this meeting. The recommended final levy amount is less than the preliminary levy adopted at the August 21, 2024, meeting. Per Council direction, staff has reduced the preliminary proposed tax levy to meet the previous year’s tax rate of 42.122%. The 2025 Budget includes Wages and Benefits for employees and the Council approved priorities for each department. These will continue to be reviewed and updated as needed in the 2025 budget. Financial/Budget No change to the tax rate. Options 1. Adopt Resolutions as presented. 2.Amend and Adopt Resolutions. Recommendation Adopt Resolutions as presented. Council Action Consider motions to adopt Resolutions to: 1) adopt 2025 Budget and 2025 Tax Levy as presented; 2) adopt 2025 Wage and Benefits Schedule. Attachments 1.Proposed 2025 Budget Memo 2.Resolution 2024-134 Adopting 2025 Budget and 2025 Tax Levy 3.Resolution 2024-135 Adopting 2025 Wage and Benefits Schedule a.2025 Wage Schedule BUDGET MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: CITY ADMINISTRATOR ABDO FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC CITY COUNCIL 2025 BUDGET 12/12/2024 Introduction Upon your request, we have summarized some of the key items for consideration in this years’ budget to Council. Budget Format The 2025 Budget includes the Council approved priorities for each department. These will continue to be reviewed and updated as needed in the 2025 budget. Key items in this year’s budget: •The total 2025 tax levy is proposed to increase $785,008 or 9.37% from 2024. o The general fund levy increased $786,687 or 10.94%. Factors relating to this increase are explained in this memo under the General Fund Budget Summary section. o The debt levy decreased by $1,679 or -0.14%. This is due to the bond payment schedule. •Staffing o Added: Assistant City Administrator, Human Resource Generalist, Information Technology Manager o Transitioned from part time to full time: Communications Specialist o Other Transitions: Administrative Assistant to Deputy Clerk o Eliminated: Accounting Clerk o All employees are projected to receive a COLA increase of 4% and eligible employees will receive a step increase. Attachment Items 8b.1. Overall, the property tax levy includes levies for general operations and debt service. The 2024 actual and 2025 proposed property tax levies are listed below: 2024 Levy Proposed 2025 Levy Increase (Decrease) from 2024 Percent Change from 2024 General Levy 7,187,648$ 7,974,335$ 786,687$ 10.94% Debt Levy Equipment Certificate Debt 2016A 38,220 37,485 (735) -1.92% Equipment Certificate Debt 2018A 82,478 80,273 (2,205) -2.67% Debt Service Levy 2018A 28,271 25,909 (2,362) -8.35% Abatement Levy 2018A 78,750 84,000 5,250 6.67% Equipment Certificate Debt 2020A 106,155 104,265 (1,890) -1.78% Facility Expansion Debt - Public Works 2020B 231,410 232,985 1,575 0.68% Equipment Certificate 2022A 247,734 250,884 3,150 1.27% Abatement Levy 2023A 185,000 190,000 5,000 2.70% Debt Service Levy 2023A 188,590 179,128 (9,462) -5.02% Total 1,186,608 1,184,929 (1,679) -0.14% Total 8,374,256$ 9,159,264$ 785,008$ 9.37% Tax Capacity 19,746,878$ 21,597,811$ 1,850,933$ 9.37% City Tax Rate*42.41% 42.41% 0.00% *The City's Payable 2025 Tax Rate has been estimated based on preliminary tax capacity information provided by Hennepin County. The final tax capacity and rate will vary from the rate estimated in this memo. Tax Levy Summary Tax Levy Summary 2020 to 2024 Actual and 2025 Proposed $- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 $8,000,000 $9,000,000 $10,000,000 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 General Levy Debt Service Tax Rate 2020 to 2024 Actual and 2025 Proposed 45.01%43.55%43.19%42.12%42.41%42.41% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 City of Corcoran Tax Rate Estimate Property Taxes Property Type Market Value 2024 Taxable Market Value 2025 Taxable Market Value 2024 Taxes Payable 2025 Taxes Payable Increase (Decrease) in Property Taxes Residential 100,000$ 71,800$ 62,500$ 304$ 265$ (39)$ Residential 200,000 180,800 171,500 767 727 (39) Residential 300,000 289,800 280,500 1,229 1,190 (39) Residential 400,000 398,800 389,500 1,691 1,652 (39) Commercial 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,923 3,923 0 Note: change in market value has not been assumed For taxes payable in 2025, the maximum exclusion amount was increased to $38,000 for properties valued at $95,000, with no exclusion for properties valued over $517,200. Tax Capacity Impact of Tax Rate Keep the Tax Levy Dollars Flat 2024 2025 Cha nge City Tax Rate 42.41% 38.77% -3.63% City Tax Levy 8,374,256$ 8,374,256$ -$ Tax Capacity 19,746,878$ 21,597,811$ 1,850,933$ Keep a Flat Tax Rate 2024 2025 Change City Tax Rate 42.41% 42.41% 0.00% City Tax Levy 8,374,256$ 9,159,264$ 785,008$ Tax Capacity 19,746,878$ 21,597,811$ 1,850,933$ Current Proposed Tax Levy & Tax Rate 2024 2025 Change City Tax Rate 42.41% 42.41% 0.00% City Tax Levy 8,374,256$ 9,159,264$ 785,008$ Tax Capacity 19,746,878$ 21,597,811$ 1,850,933$ If the City keeps a flat tax rate, the levied tax dollars will increase by $784,944 (or 9.37%). As stated before, as the tax capacity increases, cities are able to levy more dollars without a direct tax rate increase. This example reflects the proposed 2025 Corcoran tax rate and levy amounts. The dollars levied are increased by $785,008 (9.37%) and the tax rate remained flat. It is because of the increased tax capacity that the City is able to levy more dollars while having a flat tax rate. If the City keeps the tax levy dollars flat, the tax rate will decrease by 3.63%. As tax capacity increases, cities can levy more dollars without a direct tax rate increase. In this example, the city is able to keep a flat levy amount and the res idents see a decrease in the tax rate. General Fund Budget Summary Actual Budget YTD Budget Amount 2023 2024 9.30.24 2025 Change Revenues Taxes $ 7,187,648 $ 3,831,904 $ 7,974,335 $ 786,687 Licenses and permits 1,377,950 1,398,817 1,503,431 125,481 Intergovernmental 333,500 387,092 568,500 235,000 Charges for services 343,147 206,237 313,500 (29,647) Fines and forefeitures 25,000 20,096 30,000 5,000 Special assessments 611,200 89,015 545,000 (66,200) Interest on investments 25,000 41,924 25,000 - Miscellaneous $ 6,233,945 1,745,117 654,923 230,046 29,748 647,583 385,030 69,792 10,100 20,123 11,250 1,150 Total Revenues 9,996,184$ 9,913,545$ 5,995,208$ 10,971,016$ (82,639)$ Revenue Key Changes: •Taxes – o Overall increase in property taxes to offset increase in expenses and decrease in other revenues •Licenses and permits – o Increase based on historical figures •Intergovernmental – o City is administering the regional Toward Zero Death pass-through grant with disbursement of $169,000 Actual Budget YTD Budget Amount 2023 2024 9.30.24 2025 Change Expenditures General Government 1,958,495$ 2,229,115$ 1,998,351$ 2,450,785$ 221,670$ Police 3,058,947 2,813,390 1,607,963 3,368,375 554,985 Fire 580,042 645,700 382,609 678,379 32,679 Other Public Safety 936,682 791,600 481,397 794,017 2,417 Public Works/Rec/Parks 2,044,288 2,671,740 1,568,141 3,116,273 444,533 Planning/Engineering 185,840 367,500 106,863 364,884 (2,616) Transfers 1,008,981 382,000 - 198,303 (183,697) Total Expenditures 9,773,275$ 9,901,045$ 6,145,324$ 10,971,016$ 1,069,971$ Excess Revenues (Expenditures)222,909$ 12,500$ (150,116)$ -$ (1,152,610)$ Expenditure Key Changes: •General Government – o Increase in wages and benefits due to COLA and step increases o Added a new Human Resource Generalist, Assistant City Administrator, and Information Technology Manager •Police - o Increase in wages and benefits due to COLA and step increases o City is administering the regional Toward Zero Death pass-through grant with disbursement of $169,000 •Fire o Increase in contracted services •Public Works/Rec/Parks o Increase in wages and benefits due to COLA and step increases o Increase in part time staff hours o City Center Streetscape/beautification annual costs o Increase for electric utilities for city accepted streetlights o Overall increase in street repairs & maintenance and applicable material o Community Engagement Program formalized •Planning/Engineering o Increase in wages and benefits due to COLA and step increases o Added Community Development Director position o Increase in professional services based on anticipated developments approved in 2024 •Transfers o Capital Improvement Planning General Fund Budget Summary (Continued) General Fund Budget Summary (Continued) General Government 22% Police 31% Fire 6% Other Public Safety 7% Public Works/Rec/Parks 29% Planning/Engineering 3%Transfers 2% General Government Police Fire Other Public Safety Public Works/Rec/Parks Planning/Engineering Transfers Budget Detail - By Fund The following financial report is attached: •Revenues and Expenses for City of Corcoran 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE ESTIMATED REVENUES 100-00000-31000 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES 6,354,020 6,233,945 7,187,648 3,831,904 7,974,335 10.94 100-00000-31020 DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAXES 100-00000-31040 FISCAL DISPARITIES 100-00000-32100 BUSINESS LICENSE & PERMITS 10,350 46,050 5,450 64,380 10,000 83.49 100-00000-32110 ALCOHOL/TOBACCO LICENSES 15,500 15,525 15,750 15,500 15,750 100-00000-32210 BUILDING PERMITS 1,300,000 1,210,076 800,000 1,129,630 1,000,000 25.00 100-00000-32220 GAS INSTALLATION PERMITS 13,475 13,500 11,375 13,300 (1.48) 100-00000-32230 PLUMBING CONNECTION PERMITS 43,048 40,000 44,845 40,000 100-00000-32240 ANIMAL LICENSES 100-00000-32260 SIGN PERMITS 1,345 750 440 750 100-00000-32270 MECHANICAL PERMITS 60,600 55,000 63,450 55,000 100-00000-32290 WETLAND PERMIT FEES 1,000 3,000 1,500 5,600 3,000 100.00 100-00000-33400 STATE GRANTS AND AIDS 40,000 46,953 29,631 100-00000-33402 HOMESTEAD CREDIT 100-00000-33416 POLICE TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT 12,500 14,771 12,500 13,500 8.00 100-00000-33418 MUN STATE AID STREETS - MAINT 150,000 157,444 175,000 237,087 200,000 14.29 100-00000-33423 POLICE STATE AID 80,000 407,008 80,000 141,883 120,000 50.00 100-00000-33426 AGRICULTURAL MARKET VALUE CREDIT 20,000 22,026 30,000 30,000 100-00000-33429 STATE AID - PERA 1,845 100-00000-33615 COUNTY RECYCLING GRANT 13,900 13,830 14,000 7,599 14,000 100-00000-33620 OTHER COUNTY GRANTS AND AIDS 10,000 10,320 10,000 10,000 100-00000-33640 TOWARD ZERO DEATH GRANT 10,000 29,524 12,000 523 181,000 1,408.33 100-00000-34100 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 300 671 300 422 500 66.67 100-00000-34101 FACILITY RENTAL 2,000 100-00000-34103 ZONING & SUBDIVISION FEES 55,000 57,920 55,000 58,335 55,000 100-00000-34104 BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK FEE 265,941 375,000 265,000 (29.33) 100-00000-34105 COPIES/MAPS 2,000 410 2,000 1,420 2,000 100-00000-34107 ASSESSMENT SEARCHES 30 30 (100.00) 100-00000-34108 TIF ADMINISTRATION 100-00000-34109 OTHER BUILDING RELATED FEES 74,902 100,000 55,735 74,000 (26.00) 100-00000-34110 CITY PLANNER REVIEW FEE 50,000 14,889 50,000 40,766 50,000 100-00000-34200 PUBLIC SAFETY PERMITS 4,000 4,095 4,000 5,362 4,000 100-00000-34201 SPECIAL POLICE SERVICES 5,000 14,450 9,500 13,650 12,000 26.32 100-00000-34203 POLICE REPORTS 300 620 400 508 500 25.00 100-00000-34300 PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS AND FEES 16,500 20,120 17,000 17,680 17,000 100-00000-34301 DUST CONTROL 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND 100-00000-34303 ICE & SNOW REMOVAL 6,000 6,000 6,000 100-00000-34310 PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW FEE 88,200 88,200 88,200 100-00000-34400 RECYCLING 5,000 3,198 5,000 2,410 3,000 (40.00) 100-00000-34403 REFUSE COLLECTION CHARGES 4,500 5,854 5,717 1,889 5,800 1.45 100-00000-34700 PARK RENTAL 5,156 3,000 5,003 1,500 (50.00) 100-00000-34790 RECREATION PROGRAMMING 46,735 43,468 50,000 46,571 45,000 (10.00) 100-00000-35100 FINES 25,000 29,748 25,000 20,096 30,000 20.00 100-00000-36100 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 633 (4,168) 100-00000-36200 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 4,000 66,154 4,000 2,496 5,000 25.00 100-00000-36210 INTEREST EARNINGS 11,500 385,030 25,000 41,924 25,000 100-00000-36220 RENTS AND ROYALTIES 7,000 7,000 (100.00) 100-00000-36230 DONATIONS 1,000 1,020 1,100 150 1,250 13.64 100-00000-36232 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 100-00000-36400 REFUNDS/REIMBURSEMENTS 5,000 1,985 5,000 21,645 5,000 100-00000-38050 CABLE FRANCHISE FEE 59,000 66,865 61,000 66,865 65,000 6.56 100-00000-39101 SALE OF ASSETS 1,515 42,444 100-00000-39203 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUND 535,500 602,600 561,200 500,000 (10.91) 100-42100-33631 AEM - FEDERAL GRANTS 648,981 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES 8,952,680 10,645,165 9,913,545 5,995,419 10,971,016 10.67 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS 100-41110-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 19,260 19,260 19,260 9,020 19,630 1.92 100-41110-50122 FICA 1,200 1,194 1,200 559 1,200 100-41110-50126 MEDICARE 280 279 280 131 200 (28.57) 100-41110-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 5,000 1,900 5,000 5,000 100-41110-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 2,000 467 2,000 2,950 1,000 (50.00) 100-41110-50320 COMMUNICATIONS (GENERAL) 100-41110-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 150 101 150 101 105 (30.00) 100-41130-50325 OTHER COMMUNICATION 3,000 1,943 3,000 3,307 (100.00) 100-41130-50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO 10,000 10,471 12,500 9,283 (100.00) 100-41320-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 152,000 152,675 162,800 99,264 165,864 1.88 100-41320-50121 PERA 11,400 10,551 12,300 7,445 12,440 1.14 100-41320-50122 FICA 9,500 7,487 10,100 5,990 10,284 1.82 100-41320-50126 MEDICARE 2,300 1,868 2,400 1,401 2,405 0.21 100-41320-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 21,300 17,604 22,900 14,048 23,801 3.93 100-41320-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 5,000 11 4,000 704 5,000 25.00 100-41320-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,200 470 402 100-41320-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,351 100-41320-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 1,500 1,500 100-41320-50321 TELEPHONE 600 450 600 600 100-41320-50331 TRAVEL EXPENSE 600 655 600 1,700 5,000 733.33 100-41320-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 1,000 1,566 1,500 1,309 (12.73) 100-41320-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 1,400 1,546 1,500 2,972 1,500 100-41400-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 249,800 250,020 285,100 166,771 453,779 59.16 100-41400-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 2,500 11,756 8,500 9,708 5,000 (41.18) 100-41400-50111 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 30,400 17,014 27,100 16,746 (100.00) 100-41400-50112 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 100-41400-50121 PERA 21,200 20,902 24,100 12,283 34,034 41.22 100-41400-50122 FICA 17,600 17,995 19,900 11,644 28,135 41.38 100-41400-50126 MEDICARE 4,100 4,208 4,700 2,728 6,580 40.00 100-41400-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 56,300 45,765 46,200 25,615 91,287 97.59 100-41400-50140 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 100-41400-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 5,000 744 5,000 4,069 12,000 140.00 100-41400-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (2,185) 100-41400-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 6,000 2,970 7,500 25.00 100-41400-50321 TELEPHONE 150 600 600 100-41400-50331 TRAVEL EXPENSE 1,000 655 1,000 75 1,000 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND 100-41400-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 3,000 1,851 3,000 8,870 2,090 (30.33) 100-41400-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 1,500 750 484 1,500 100.00 100-41410-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 100-41410-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 752 100-41410-50114 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES 500 25,000 3,968 (100.00) 100-41410-50122 FICA 100-41410-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 100-41410-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3,000 1,568 8,000 2,085 2,000 (75.00) 100-41410-50331 TRAVEL EXPENSE 300 300 13 (100.00) 100-41410-50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 100 8,363 100 (100.00) 100-41500-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 224,100 207,937 247,200 84,663 74,267 (69.96) 100-41500-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 1,000 1,518 1,500 3,909 1,500 100-41500-50121 PERA 16,900 14,823 18,700 5,591 5,570 (70.21) 100-41500-50122 FICA 14,000 13,144 15,500 5,650 4,605 (70.29) 100-41500-50126 MEDICARE 3,300 3,074 3,700 1,321 1,077 (70.89) 100-41500-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 63,300 41,770 60,400 15,215 19,559 (67.62) 100-41500-50140 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 3,156 100-41500-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 3,500 1,752 10,000 4,109 2,000 (80.00) 100-41500-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 47,250 63,483 85,000 377,988 208,000 144.71 100-41500-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 1,854 1,500 100-41500-50331 TRAVEL EXPENSE 500 500 312 300 (40.00) 100-41500-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 1,983 2,000 780 (61.00) 100-41500-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 1,000 380 1,000 774 750 (25.00) 100-41550-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 300 190 100-41550-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 120,000 150,000 165,000 165,000 (100.00) 100-41600-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45,000 79,656 50,000 79,390 85,000 70.00 100-41900-50200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5,000 4,871 10,500 3,328 7,500 (28.57) 100-41900-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 35,500 17,117 30,000 13,338 25,000 (16.67) 100-41900-50212 MOTOR FUELS 500 844 500 506 1,000 100.00 100-41900-50221 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - EQUIP.1,571 1,666 1,500 100-41900-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30,000 33,066 7,000 234,871 15,000 114.29 100-41900-50308 SOFTWARE 23,000 368 25,000 8.70 100-41900-50321 TELEPHONE 4,000 5,509 6,000 4,349 6,000 100-41900-50322 POSTAGE 4,000 5,625 4,000 2,810 6,000 50.00 100-41900-50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO 1,000 1,957 1,000 4,829 17,200 1,620.00 100-41900-50360 INSURANCE 108,000 128,705 139,300 136,272 155,000 11.27 100-41900-50380 UTILITY SERVICES 15,000 5,374 15,000 5,384 15,000 100-41900-50381 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 19,000 26,529 20,000 17,372 30,000 50.00 100-41900-50382 WATER & SEWER 81 211 100 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND 100-41900-50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - CONTRACT 14,000 2,848 14,000 1,537 15,000 7.14 100-41900-50401 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - BUILDING 18,000 23,024 18,000 27,180 25,000 38.89 100-41900-50403 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE 1,500 219 1,500 1,863 5,000 233.33 100-41900-50404 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - MACHINERY/EQUIP 2,000 3,011 3,000 7,500 150.00 100-41900-50413 OFFICE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 600 568 600 284 750 25.00 100-41900-50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 20,000 5,412 1,876 100-41900-50431 BANKING CHARGES 400 246 400 60 400 100-41900-50432 CREDIT CARD FEES 8,000 3,223 500 2,002 5,000 900.00 100-41900-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 25,300 26,384 28,600 28,904 30,000 4.90 100-41900-50520 BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES 100-41900-50700 TRANSFERS 360,000 360,000 382,000 198,303 (48.09) 100-41910-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 111,100 104,744 126,400 81,064 213,183 68.66 100-41910-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 1,000 87 1,200 2,754 1,000 (16.67) 100-41910-50111 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 4,300 4,357 100-41910-50121 PERA 8,800 8,182 9,600 6,292 16,064 67.33 100-41910-50122 FICA 7,300 6,064 8,000 4,685 13,280 66.00 100-41910-50126 MEDICARE 1,700 1,418 1,900 1,096 3,106 63.47 100-41910-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 25,000 32,701 32,000 18,746 55,645 73.89 100-41910-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 1,500 1,024 8,500 9,230 9,900 16.47 100-41910-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 500 103 500 120 600 20.00 100-41910-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 70,000 76,085 78,600 30,439 88,100 12.09 100-41910-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 3,000 4,500 50.00 100-41910-50308 SOFTWARE 4,600 100-41910-50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO 750 873 750 (100.00) 100-41910-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 500 247 500 2,642 1,663 232.60 100-41910-50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 80 48 100-41910-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 250 99 725 700 1,850 155.17 100-41920-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 42,800 89,816 109.85 100-41920-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 800 (100.00) 100-41920-50121 PERA 3,300 6,737 104.15 100-41920-50122 FICA 2,700 5,569 106.26 100-41920-50126 MEDICARE 700 1,303 86.14 100-41920-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 11,300 11,758 4.05 100-41920-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 40,000 75,334 28,421 100-41920-50221 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - EQUIP.45,000 14,637 45,000 8,693 45,000 100-41920-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140,000 144,101 120,000 125,151 150,000 25.00 100-41920-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 1,500 1,500 100-41920-50308 SOFTWARE 17,000 11,735 25,000 47.06 100-41920-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 410 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND 100-41920-50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - CONTRACT 100-42100-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 1,189,700 1,122,955 1,355,200 738,854 1,483,117 9.44 100-42100-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 39,400 44,562 47,500 18,114 54,816 15.40 100-42100-50103 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - EVENT PAY 18,000 31,098 18,000 6,689 31,500 75.00 100-42100-50111 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 134,100 94,885 116,700 79,920 172,320 47.66 100-42100-50112 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 4,919 811 100-42100-50113 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - EVENT PAY 15,000 7,794 12,000 12,881 10,500 (12.50) 100-42100-50121 PERA 228,700 224,055 257,700 147,228 308,291 19.63 100-42100-50122 FICA 5,900 3,329 4,800 2,994 6,762 40.88 100-42100-50126 MEDICARE 19,800 18,599 22,000 12,420 24,004 9.11 100-42100-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 216,700 215,555 252,600 119,147 290,165 14.87 100-42100-50140 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 100 100-42100-50150 HEALTH INSURANCE SEVERANCE PAYMENT 20,000 100-42100-50200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,600 2,239 4,000 1,558 4,000 100-42100-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 38,000 44,665 40,000 31,248 45,000 12.50 100-42100-50209 POLICE RESERVES 3,500 2,606 3,500 2,565 4,000 14.29 100-42100-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 21,000 23,579 29,000 17,056 36,000 24.14 100-42100-50212 MOTOR FUELS 27,000 38,479 30,000 22,581 45,000 50.00 100-42100-50220 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 8,000 16,117 12,000 1,825 14,000 16.67 100-42100-50223 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 7,500 1,980 7,500 1,491 7,500 100-42100-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30,000 38,994 32,000 33,577 32,000 100-42100-50304 LEGAL FEES 25,500 51,725 40,000 21,450 40,000 100-42100-50305 PRISONER 4,000 3,434 4,000 1,517 4,000 100-42100-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 20,000 9,716 22,500 12.50 100-42100-50308 SOFTWARE 38,600 5,336 38,600 100-42100-50321 TELEPHONE 12,500 11,954 12,500 8,709 14,500 16.00 100-42100-50322 POSTAGE 100 28 100 100 100-42100-50323 RADIO UNITS 23,500 21,792 24,440 14,185 25,400 3.93 100-42100-50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO 800 1,248 800 (100.00) 100-42100-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 150,000 136,158 155,000 135,006 135,000 (12.90) 100-42100-50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - CONTRACT 500 760 1,000 1,000 100-42100-50403 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE 7,700 14,222 15,000 4,761 15,000 100-42100-50417 UNIFORMS 26,000 26,105 26,000 13,910 27,000 3.85 100-42100-50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 100-42100-50432 CREDIT CARD FEES 1,500 1,500 100-42100-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 3,500 2,507 3,500 2,414 3,500 100-42100-50435 GRANT DISBURSEMENT 169,000 100-42100-50438 POLICE K9 3,148 3,000 746 4,000 33.33 100-42100-50700 TRANSFERS 7,000 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND 100-42102-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 140,300 137,875 155,500 94,868 166,888 7.32 100-42102-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 500 500 347 1,000 100.00 100-42102-50111 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 32,128 100-42102-50121 PERA 10,600 10,341 11,700 7,141 14,927 27.58 100-42102-50122 FICA 8,800 8,859 9,700 5,958 12,339 27.21 100-42102-50126 MEDICARE 2,100 2,072 2,300 1,393 2,886 25.48 100-42102-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 25,900 26,049 27,200 19,616 28,412 4.46 100-42102-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 3,000 100-42102-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 3,000 3,000 100-42102-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 1,581 1,600 920 (42.50) 100-42151-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 3,000 750 3,000 1,033 3,000 100-42151-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 5,450 1,750 5,450 5,830 6,000 10.09 100-42151-50381 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 1,000 1,901 1,200 1,643 1,500 25.00 100-42151-50404 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - MACHINERY/EQUIP 1,700 1,797 1,800 925 1,800 100-42151-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 500 400 500 500 500 100-42200-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 18,700 100-42200-50121 PERA 3,400 100-42200-50122 FICA 100-42200-50126 MEDICARE 300 100-42200-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 3,500 100-42200-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 1,000 3,000 (100.00) 100-42200-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 5,000 5,000 (100.00) 100-42200-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 569,630 570,042 621,900 382,609 678,379 9.08 100-42200-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 100-42200-50321 TELEPHONE 150 600 (100.00) 100-42200-50323 RADIO UNITS 300 1,200 (100.00) 100-42200-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 3,500 100-42200-50403 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE 1,200 2,000 (100.00) 100-42200-50417 UNIFORMS 1,500 1,500 (100.00) 100-42200-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 500 500 (100.00) 100-42200-50580 OTHER EQUIPMENT 10,000 10,000 (100.00) 100-42200-50700 TRANSFERS 10,000 100-42400-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 197,100 182,576 216,300 123,820 218,021 0.80 100-42400-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 1,000 874 500 883 2,000 300.00 100-42400-50121 PERA 14,900 13,759 16,300 9,408 16,352 0.32 100-42400-50122 FICA 12,300 11,973 13,500 7,993 13,518 0.13 100-42400-50126 MEDICARE 2,900 2,761 3,200 1,869 3,162 (1.19) 100-42400-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 32,700 17,469 35,700 10,597 36,009 0.87 100-42400-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 1,000 1,171 3,000 2,990 8,250 175.00 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND 100-42400-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 400,000 631,038 400,000 274,657 450,000 12.50 100-42400-50303 ENGINEERING FEES 30,000 31,267 30,000 18,627 35,000 16.67 100-42400-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 3,000 3,000 3,000 100-42400-50308 SOFTWARE 385 100-42400-50331 TRAVEL EXPENSE 60 1,000 45 500 (50.00) 100-42400-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 806 1,500 5,320 254.67 100-42400-50432 CREDIT CARD FEES 1,411 500 495 1,500 200.00 100-42400-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 109 1,000 199 1,000 100-42401-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 28,000 23,053 34,300 21,049 (100.00) 100-42401-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 1,000 87 400 (212)(100.00) 100-42401-50121 PERA 2,200 1,743 2,600 1,569 (100.00) 100-42401-50122 FICA 1,800 1,532 2,200 1,365 (100.00) 100-42401-50126 MEDICARE 500 358 600 319 (100.00) 100-42401-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 3,800 3,438 9,400 2,724 (100.00) 100-42401-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 1,500 350 1,500 (100.00) 100-42401-50212 MOTOR FUELS 100-42401-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,000 10,847 15,000 (100.00) 100-42401-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 100-42401-50417 UNIFORMS 100 100 (100.00) 100-42401-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 100-43100-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 701,400 584,240 785,600 497,532 799,034 1.71 100-43100-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 52,500 63,753 53,300 27,940 53,000 (0.56) 100-43100-50111 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 7,100 23,403 7,000 2,792 38,124 444.63 100-43100-50112 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 100-43100-50121 PERA 56,600 48,630 62,900 35,458 59,928 (4.72) 100-43100-50122 FICA 47,200 39,795 52,500 30,589 51,904 (1.14) 100-43100-50126 MEDICARE 11,100 9,307 12,300 7,154 12,139 (1.31) 100-43100-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 150,000 120,667 162,400 65,275 162,502 0.06 100-43100-50140 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 8,885 100-43100-50200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,000 1,000 1,000 100-43100-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 7,500 1,804 7,500 1,259 7,500 100-43100-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 43,500 20,880 43,500 9,671 45,000 3.45 100-43100-50211 STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION 20,000 100-43100-50212 MOTOR FUELS 60,000 56,652 60,000 25,466 65,000 8.33 100-43100-50220 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 70,000 59,856 75,000 21,697 78,500 4.67 100-43100-50223 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 15,000 9,752 15,000 15,902 20,000 33.33 100-43100-50225 LANDSCAPE/DITCH MATERIALS 50,000 27,111 43,000 10,595 45,000 4.65 100-43100-50226 SIGN REPAIR MATERIALS 10,000 7,371 10,000 5,093 10,000 100-43100-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,153 1,540 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND 100-43100-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 15,000 9,000 12,000 (20.00) 100-43100-50321 TELEPHONE 11,500 8,043 11,500 4,011 12,500 8.70 100-43100-50323 RADIO UNITS 4,000 3,887 5,000 3,811 5,000 100-43100-50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO 500 230 500 (100.00) 100-43100-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 35,000 34,469 35,000 41,454 40,570 15.91 100-43100-50380 UTILITY SERVICES 22,000 13,825 22,000 8,239 22,000 100-43100-50381 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 10,000 19,401 20,000 12,657 60,000 200.00 100-43100-50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - CONTRACT 7,500 8,282 9,000 2,243 10,000 11.11 100-43100-50401 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - BUILDING 10,000 2,822 10,000 381 10,000 100-43100-50403 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE 10,000 14,267 10,000 (1,653)12,500 25.00 100-43100-50417 UNIFORMS 12,500 14,938 13,500 9,493 15,000 11.11 100-43100-50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 500 100-43100-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 500 500 123 (100.00) 100-43121-50224 STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 15,000 34,098 20,000 3,051 25,000 25.00 100-43121-50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - CONTRACT 290,000 104,707 300,000 140,705 350,000 16.67 100-43122-50224 STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 112,500 119,508 125,000 116,283 165,000 32.00 100-43122-50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - CONTRACT 232,500 229,075 275,000 289,406 350,000 27.27 100-43125-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 55,000 44,848 60,000 104 70,000 16.67 100-43125-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,100 2,100 2,100 100-43170-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 185,700 57,800 205,200 36,275 192,385 (6.25) 100-43170-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 100-43170-50111 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 100-43170-50121 PERA 14,000 4,335 15,500 2,721 14,429 (6.91) 100-43170-50122 FICA 11,600 3,517 12,800 2,217 11,928 (6.81) 100-43170-50126 MEDICARE 2,700 822 3,000 518 2,790 (7.00) 100-43170-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 34,700 2,385 39,500 1,264 38,142 (3.44) 100-43170-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 80,000 108,330 80,000 55,363 80,000 100-43170-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 1,500 4,500 200.00 100-43170-50309 WATERSHED LGU 10,000 8,651 10,000 8,505 12,500 25.00 100-43170-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 8,210 100-43201-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3,500 4,751 3,600 3,549 3,600 100-43201-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,000 10,465 10,000 10,228 10,000 100-45100-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 38,800 38,090 64,500 26,090 124,535 93.08 100-45100-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 14 600 600 100-45100-50111 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 27,000 29,000 29,997 3.44 100-45100-50121 PERA 3,000 2,858 4,900 1,957 11,590 136.53 100-45100-50122 FICA 4,200 2,486 5,900 1,683 9,581 62.39 100-45100-50126 MEDICARE 1,000 581 1,400 394 2,241 60.07 100-45100-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 8,800 4,588 14,200 2,791 46,749 229.22 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND 100-45100-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 17,770 5,055 7,000 4,944 4,000 (42.86) 100-45100-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 21,430 16,333 22,500 14,416 23,000 2.22 100-45100-50213 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM 22,100 100-45100-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,360 4,536 3,360 3,997 4,500 33.93 100-45100-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 1,500 642 3,000 100.00 100-45100-50321 TELEPHONE 100-45100-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 4,082 4,000 3,919 (2.03) 100-45100-50417 UNIFORMS 150 144 180 170 200 11.11 100-45100-50432 CREDIT CARD FEES 4,000 4,000 100-45100-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 500 485 500 310 600 20.00 100-45200-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 38,800 51,561 21,500 37,168 (100.00) 100-45200-50102 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - OVERTIME 1,000 14 200 (100.00) 100-45200-50111 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 19,700 9,193 35,200 52,271 48.50 100-45200-50121 PERA 3,000 2,858 1,700 1,957 3,920 130.59 100-45200-50122 FICA 3,700 3,891 3,600 2,370 3,241 (9.97) 100-45200-50126 MEDICARE 900 910 900 554 758 (15.78) 100-45200-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 8,800 9,625 4,800 5,572 (100.00) 100-45200-50140 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 100-45200-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 100 100 100 100-45200-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 30,000 25,411 34,000 7,184 50,000 47.06 100-45200-50221 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - EQUIP.50,000 43,644 43,000 26,258 50,000 16.28 100-45200-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000 750 1,000 501 1,000 100-45200-50321 TELEPHONE 2,000 2,000 2,000 100-45200-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 14,000 9,935 10,000 14,227 5,470 (45.30) 100-45200-50380 UTILITY SERVICES 6,500 4,946 6,500 2,840 7,500 15.38 100-45200-50381 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 1,500 1,742 2,500 670 2,500 100-45200-50382 WATER & SEWER 2,500 753 2,500 398 2,500 100-45200-50417 UNIFORMS 100-45200-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS (25) 100-45200-50530 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 40,000 46,953 100-49360-50720 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 648,981 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,952,680 9,124,294 9,901,045 6,144,979 10,971,016 10.81 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED 2024/2025 GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET % CHANGE 2025 BUDGET - GENERAL FUND TOTAL REVENUES 8,952,680 10,645,165 9,913,545 5,995,419 10,971,016 10.67 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,952,680 9,124,294 9,901,045 6,144,979 10,971,016 10.81 NET REV/EXP 0 1,520,871 12,500 (149,560)0 City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-134 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2025 BUDGET AND FINAL 2025 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2025 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Corcoran, that the City Council hereby adopt the 2025 City Budget; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City of Corcoran, that the City Council hereby declare the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 2025, for the following purposes: GENERAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY $7,974,335 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE DEBT 2016A $37,485 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE DEBT 2018A $80,273 DEBT SERVICE LEVY 2018A $25,909 ABATEMENT LEVY 2018A $84,000 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE DEBT 2020A $104,265 FACILITY EXPANSION DEBT – PUBLIC WORKS 2020B $232,985 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE DEBT 2022A $250,884 ABATEMENT LEVY 2023A $190,000 DEBT SERVICE LEVY 2023A $179,128 FOR A TOTAL LEVY OF $9,159,264 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of December 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor City Seal ATTEST: ___________________________________ Debra Johnson – City Clerk Agenda Attachment 8b2 City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-135 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING 2025 WAGE SCHEDULE AND BENEFIT PACKAGE FOR CITY EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota will adopt the 2025 General Fund Budget and the 2025 Property Tax levy; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish the following direction regarding employee wages and benefits. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the following: 1. 2025 Full-time Part-time and Seasonal Wage Schedule (Exhibit A) 2.The City Administrator is authorized to approve step increases for eligible employees contingent upon a satisfactory performance evaluation. 3.The City Administrator is authorized to approve the hiring of part-time and seasonal employees for positions that have been approved in the 2025 budget. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of December 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor City Seal ATTEST: _______________________________ Debra Johnson – City Clerk Agenda Attachment 8b3 Start 6 Month 1234 5 $22.83 $23.66 $24.50 $25.34 $26.17 $27.01 $27.85 $24.16 $25.05 $25.93 $26.82 $27.71 $28.59 $29.48 $25.58 $26.51 $27.45 $28.39 $29.33 $30.26 $31.20 $27.07 $28.07 $29.06 $30.05 $31.04 $32.03 $33.03 $28.66 $29.71 $30.76 $31.81 $32.86 $33.91 $34.96 $30.33 $31.45 $32.56 $33.67 $34.78 $35.89 $37.00 $32.11 $33.28 $34.46 $35.64 $36.81 $37.99 $39.17 $33.99 $35.23 $36.48 $37.72 $38.97 $40.21 $41.46 $35.97 $37.29 $38.61 $39.93 $41.25 $42.57 $43.89 $38.08 $39.47 $40.87 $42.27 $43.66 $45.06 $46.45 $40.31 $41.78 $43.26 $44.74 $46.22 $47.69 $49.17 $42.66 $44.23 $45.79 $47.36 $48.92 $50.48 $52.05 $45.16 $46.82 $48.47 $50.13 $51.78 $53.44 $55.09 $47.80 $49.55 $51.31 $53.06 $54.81 $56.56 $58.31 $50.60 $52.45 $54.31 $56.16 $58.02 $59.87 $61.73 $53.56 $55.52 $57.48 $59.45 $61.41 $63.37 $65.34 $56.69 $58.77 $60.85 $62.93 $65.00 $67.08 $69.16 $60.01 $62.21 $64.41 $66.61 $68.81 $71.00 $73.20 $63.52 $65.85 $68.17 $70.50 $72.83 $75.16 $77.49 $67.23 $69.70 $72.16 $74.63 $77.09 $79.56 $82.02 Rate $27.07 $27.07 $43.26 $27.07 Start 1 Year 2 Year 14.70$ 15.52$ 16.33$ 20.82$ 21.98$ 23.14$ 28.32$ 29.89$ 31.47$ 20.82$ 21.98$ 23.14$ 28.32$ 29.89$ 31.47$ 20.02$ ‐$ ‐$ 19 20 Program Coordinato Plow Operator Management Intern Rink Attendant Maintenance Worke Maintenance Worke 2025 FULL-TIME WAGE SCHEDULE Steps Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2025 SEASONAL WAGE SCHEDULE Position Position Police Administrative Assistant Planning Administrative Assista Police Officer Community Service Officer 2025 PART‐TIME WAGE SCHEDULE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Agenda Attachment 8b3a BUDGET MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: CITY ADMINISTRATOR ABDO FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC CITY COUNCIL 2025 UTILITY BUDGET 12/12/2024 Introduction Upon your request, we have summarized some of the key items for consideration in this years’ budget to Council. Budget Format Key items in this year’s budget: •Staffing o Updated personnel allocations for Water and Sewer for Public Works Director and Administrative Assistant to 25% Water and 25% Sewer. o New positions: Utility Superintendent and Utility Maintenance Worker: allocated 50% Water and 50% Sewer. o All employees are projected to receive a COLA increase of 4% and eligible employees will receive a step increase. •Projected growth rate at 30 units per month. •Base water usage rates increased due to increase in Maple Grove volumetric charges. •Trunk Line Area Charges (TLAC) are projected to increase 3.9%, with an additional 20 acres in SE and 15 acres in NE Corcoran over the 2024 budget. •Municipal Wastewater Charge from Metropolitan Council increased $87,000. Agenda Item 8c. Enterprise Funds Budget Summary Actual Budget YTD Budget Amount 2023 2024 9.30.24 2025 Change WATER Revenues 2,974,112$ 3,308,100$ 2,439,285$ 4,639,740$ 1,331,640$ Expenditures 2,060,860 3,071,212 757,545 3,126,017 54,805 Excess Revenues (Expenditures)913,252$ 236,888$ 1,681,740$ 1,513,723$ 1,276,835$ SEWER Revenues 1,565,418$ 1,612,600$ 1,410,515$ 2,146,600$ 534,000$ Expenditures 946,711 1,154,288 354,723 1,455,797 301,509 Excess Revenues (Expenditures)618,707$ 458,312$ 1,055,792$ 690,803$ 232,491$ 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 601-00000-36100 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 4,013 20,859 601-00000-36200 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 2,106 601-00000-36210 INTEREST EARNINGS 15,000 668,116 15,000 941,386 15,000 601-00000-36232 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 601-00000-36400 REFUNDS/REIMBURSEMENTS 601-00000-37101 WATER METERS 93,750 47,328 85,500 13,064 115,500 601-00000-37102 BULK WATER SALES 500 500 157 500 601-00000-37110 WATER RESIDENTIAL USAGE 545,600 603,307 763,300 414,717 828,000 601-00000-37120 WATER MULTI-RESIDENTAL USAGE 26,600 601-00000-37130 WATER COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL 17,400 23,870 30,600 81,777 33,800 601-00000-37150 WATER RECONNECT/DISCONNECT FEE 200 601-00000-37155 MAPLE GROVE CONNECTION 51,497 (4,112) 601-00000-37160 WATER PENALTY 100 100 1,777 100 601-00000-37170 WATER CONNECTION CHARGE 314,000 345,307 295,000 12,434 411,840 601-00000-37180 WATER TRUNK CHARGES (TLAC)1,408,500 1,228,368 2,118,100 957,226 3,208,400 601-00000-39201 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES 2,394,850 2,974,112 3,308,100 2,439,285 4,639,740 2025 BUDGET - WATER 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 601-49400-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 47,900 91,400 153,770 601-49400-50121 PERA 3,600 6,900 11,533 601-49400-50122 FICA 3,000 5,700 9,534 601-49400-50126 MEDICARE 700 1,400 2,230 601-49400-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 10,700 19,500 29,379 601-49400-50200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100 285 600 46 5,000 601-49400-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 1,500 828 3,000 1,868 4,500 601-49400-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 6,700 66,466 6,700 95,335 10,000 601-49400-50212 MOTOR FUELS 601-49400-50220 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 25,000 25,000 316 25,000 601-49400-50227 UTILITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 100,000 58,850 100,000 100,000 601-49400-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20,000 19,885 45,000 145,354 60,000 601-49400-50303 ENGINEERING FEES 125,000 354 75,000 44,939 10,000 601-49400-50304 LEGAL FEES 3,000 2,066 5,000 375 5,000 601-49400-50306 INSPECTIONS 10,000 8,694 10,000 50,000 601-49400-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 1,500 601-49400-50310 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 52,000 5,643 52,000 31,793 52,000 601-49400-50311 WATER PURCHASED 231,800 254,617 240,000 130,137 330,000 601-49400-50322 POSTAGE 2,000 49 2,500 13,800 601-49400-50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO 100 132 500 500 601-49400-50360 INSURANCE 700 700 1,500 601-49400-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 500 910 2,500 1,051 6,243 601-49400-50380 UTILITY SERVICES 2,500 2,619 1,500 1,443 1,500 601-49400-50381 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 179 500 140 500 601-49400-50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - CONTRACT 1,500 223 1,500 1,500 601-49400-50413 OFFICE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 500 568 500 284 500 601-49400-50420 DEPRECIATION 250,000 142,927 145,000 375,000 601-49400-50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 383,963 70,117 601-49400-50432 CREDIT CARD FEES 7,000 5,268 7,000 7,715 10,000 601-49400-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 1,000 994 1,500 605 1,500 601-49400-50600 DEBT SERVICE PRINICPAL 169,700 181,600 179,400 551,600 601-49400-50610 DEBT SERVICE INTEREST 50,800 572,936 44,512 46,627 926,185 601-49400-50611 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS 240,204 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET 601-49400-50720 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 292,200 292,200 1,994,200 376,243 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 1,419,500 2,060,860 3,071,212 757,545 3,126,017 NET OF REVENUES/APPROPRIATIONS - FUND 601 975,350 913,252 236,888 1,681,740 1,513,723 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5,801,686 5,801,686 6,714,938 6,714,938 8,396,678 ENDING FUND BALANCE 6,777,036 6,714,938 6,951,826 8,396,678 9,910,401 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 602-00000-36100 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 1,003 5,215 602-00000-36200 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 3,000 52,614 10,000 8,351 8,500 602-00000-36210 INTEREST EARNINGS 7,000 153,080 15,000 68,465 15,000 602-00000-36400 REFUNDS/REIMBURSEMENTS 602-00000-37210 SEWER RESIDENTIAL 592,400 576,671 740,400 461,732 854,000 602-00000-37230 SEWER COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL 13,500 22,528 28,200 11,826 30,000 602-00000-37250 SEWER RECONNECT/DISCONNECT FEE 200 602-00000-37260 SEWER PENALTY 100 100 1,881 100 602-00000-37275 SEWER ACCESS CHARGES-CITY 310,750 322,778 292,000 372,599 407,400 602-00000-37280 SEWER TRUNK CHARGES 444,300 436,544 526,900 480,446 831,600 602-00000-39201 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES 1,371,050 1,565,418 1,612,600 1,410,515 2,146,600 2025 BUDGET - SEWER 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 602-49450-50101 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES - REGULAR 47,900 91,400 167,316 602-49450-50121 PERA 3,600 6,900 12,549 602-49450-50122 FICA 3,000 5,700 10,374 602-49450-50126 MEDICARE 700 1,400 2,427 602-49450-50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 10,700 19,500 34,082 602-49450-50200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 200 123 250 46 250 602-49450-50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 1,100 2,540 1,500 210 1,500 602-49450-50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3,000 495 3,000 1,565 3,000 602-49450-50220 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 20,000 161 20,000 316 20,000 602-49450-50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,000 2,151 37,000 1,000 62,000 602-49450-50303 ENGINEERING FEES 15,000 2,086 10,000 8,449 10,000 602-49450-50304 LEGAL FEES 1,000 2,500 2,500 602-49450-50306 INSPECTIONS 5,000 8,014 10,000 10,000 602-49450-50307 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 1,500 602-49450-50312 MCES SEWAGE TREATMENT 205,000 228,390 281,000 187,307 368,000 602-49450-50322 POSTAGE 2,500 2,500 2,500 602-49450-50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO 100 500 500 602-49450-50360 INSURANCE 500 500 500 602-49450-50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 500 761 2,000 930 2,000 602-49450-50380 UTILITY SERVICES 6,000 2,712 1,500 3,512 1,500 602-49450-50381 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 2,368 4,500 4,500 602-49450-50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - CONTRACT 3,000 4,573 3,000 1,823 3,000 602-49450-50413 OFFICE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 500 568 500 284 500 602-49450-50420 DEPRECIATION 250,000 208,951 209,000 209,000 602-49450-50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 127,403 18,964 602-49450-50432 CREDIT CARD FEES 7,000 7,716 7,000 7,714 10,000 602-49450-50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 1,000 1,500 605 1,500 602-49450-50600 DEBT SERVICE PRINICPAL 115,300 85,600 85,600 88,400 602-49450-50610 DEBT SERVICE INTEREST 46,500 37,299 36,398 36,398 33,788 602-49450-50611 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS 602-49450-50720 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 310,400 310,400 309,640 392,611 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 1,071,500 946,711 1,154,288 354,723 1,455,797 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 AMENDED ACTIVITY AMENDED ACTIVITY PROPOSED GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET THRU 09/30/24 BUDGET NET OF REVENUES/APPROPRIATIONS - FUND 602 299,550 618,707 458,312 1,055,792 690,803 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 6,599,987 6,599,987 7,218,692 7,218,692 8,274,484 ENDING FUND BALANCE 6,899,537 7,218,694 7,677,004 8,274,484 8,965,287 Agenda Attachment: 8c1. City of Corcoran December 12, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-137 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINAL 2025 ENTERPRISE FUNDS BUDGET WHEREAS, it is the policy of the Corcoran City Council to prepare and adopt budgets for the Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stormwater, and Street Light Funds, also known as Enterprise Funds; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Corcoran, that the City Council hereby adopts the 2025 budgets for the Water and Sanitary Sewer Funds, also known as Enterprise Funds with the following revenues and expenditures: Water Fund (601) Sewer Fund (602) Revenue $ 4,639,740 $ 2,146,600 Expenditures $ 3,126,017 $ 1,455,797 Net Income $ 1,513,723 $ 690,803 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 12th day of December, 2024. Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: City Seal Debra Johnson – City Clerk STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 8d. Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson / Lauren Letsche Topic: MS4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Annual Public Input Opportunity Action Required: Discussion Summary As part of the city’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit, a public input opportunity must be provided related to the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). In the past, this event has been coordinated with Corcoran Country Daze. Beginning in 2020, the public input opportunity has been incorporated into a regular Council meeting. The SWPPP is available for review on the city’s website or upon request at City Hall. Financial/Budget This permit requirement is budgeted in the general engineering line item. Options Document public comments or questions related to the city’s MS4 SWPPP. Recommendation Staff will document comments or questions related to the city’s MS4 SWPPP. Council Action None Attachments 1.City of Corcoran – Annual MS4 SWPPP Public Input Opportunity Stormwater Program Overview City of Corcoran Annual MS4 SWPPP Public Input Opportunity Stormwater Program Overview Corcoran City Council December 12, 2024 https://www.corcoranmn.gov/our_community/recycling/storm_water Why? Clean Water Act Regulates discharge of pollutants to waters NPDES Program EPA MPCA City What’s involved? Permit to Discharge Stormwater from MPCA (MS4 Permit) Develop and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) What is an MS4? Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) •Owned by a State, City, Village, or Other Public Entity that discharges to Waters of the U.S. •Designed or used to collect or convey stormwater •Not a combined sewer system •Not part of a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (sewage treatment plant) Minimum Control Measures (MCMs) 1.Public Education and Outreach i.Quarterly Newsletter 2.Public Participation i.Public Input (this meeting, website) 3.Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination i.Respond, investigate, and enforce illicit discharges 4.Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control i.Inspect and enforce construction sites 5.Post-Construction Stormwater Management i.Stormwater development rules 6.Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations i.Corcoran facility inspections November 16, 2020 MPCA reissues new MS4 General Permit April 15, 2021 150 days to submit updated SWPPP to MPCA Spring – Summer 2021 MPCA reviews application. Complete application will go on public notice for 30 days Summer 2021 Coverage is issued after permittee addresses any public comments Fall 2022 12 months from issuance to meet new permit requirements New MS4 PERMIT TIMELINE Comments or Questions? Comments or questions can be submitted to: Kevin Mattson, Public Works Director kmattson@corcoranmn.gov STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 8e. Council MeetingDecember 12, 2024 Prepared By Jay Tobin Topic 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Plan Action Required Review and Recommendations Summary City staff is proactively striving to move toward a 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), with the first step of identifying CIP items needed over the next 24 months along with proposed funding sources to cover those needs. This format is intended to provide the full scope of CIP needs in order to assist in analysis as we innovate and creatively approach problem solving in our process of strategic decision making. The DRAFT CIP items are broken down by year (2025 and 2026) by department, and funding sources are identified (i.e. Equipment Bond, Park Dedication, Utility Fund, Budget). Financial/Budget In 2025, Equipment Bond not to exceed $1,625,520.00 and G.O. Bond not to exceed $4,430,000.00 (if future land acquisition plan were to move forward from 2026). In 2026, Equipment Bond not to exceed $1,278,020.00 and G.O. Bond not to exce3ed $800,000.00 Options 1.Review details of DRAFT 2025-2026 CIP and provide recommendations and guidance. Recommendation Review details of DRAFT 2025-2026 CIP and provide recommendations and guidance. Attachments 1.DRAFT 202-2026 Capital Improvement Plan STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 11. Council Meeting: December 12, 2024 Prepared By: Deb Johnson Topic: 2025 City Council Calendar Action Required: Approval Summary Attached to this report is a draft calendar for City Council and Commission meetings for 2025. It includes the following change from the typical 2nd and 4th Thursday meetings for City Council: •The second City Council meeting in November is proposed to be moved to Monday, November 24 to avoid the Thanksgiving holiday. •The second City Council meeting in December is proposed to be moved to Monday, December 22 to avoid the Christmas holiday. In addition to the regular meeting schedule, the City Council should discuss whether regular work sessions should be scheduled in 2025 in the first quarter. Financial/Budget None. Options 1.Approve 2025 City Council Calendar as presented. 2.Approve 2025 City Calendar with amendments. Recommendation Approve 2025 City Calendar. Council Action Consider a motion to approve 2025 City Calendar as presented. Attachments 1.Draft 2025 City of Corcoran Calendar Meetings. 2.2025 City Council Schedule S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Updated 12/2/2024 H:\City Hall Information\CITY GOVERNMENT\Calendars jnichols@corcoranmn.gov Septic / Henn Co. 763-972-3335 Engineer 763-479-4209 612-543-5200 763-479-1720 Republic Services OCTOBER Jeremy Nichols City Assessor Alternative Meeting Dates City Holiday Council Quarterly Work Sess. Dean Vehrenkamp Planning Commission dvehrenkamp@corcoranmn.gov Mark Lanterman APRIL MAY JUNE SEPTEMBER Parks & Trails Commissions Michelle R. Friedrich Building Inspector mlanterman@corcoranmn.gov JULY FEBRUARY MARCH Council Members 612-348-2943 NOVEMBER DECEMBER AUGUST 2025 CITY OF CORCORAN Meetings Contracted Services Council Tom McKee tmckee@corcoranmn.gov Planning 612-638-0225 Mayor JANUARY Agenda Item: 11.2 City of Corcoran 2025 City Council Schedule (as of December 5, 2024) Below is a tentative schedule for City Council meetings subject to change. January 9, 2025 • Oath of Office for Mayor and New Council Members (3 Total) • Commission Board Appointments • Utility Maintenance Worker Job Description • Designate Official Depository • Recognition of Employee: • Matt Gottschalk – 10 years (Public Safety) January 14, 2025 – Strategic Work Session (1 of 2) (4:30-8:30PM) *Conflicts* January 23, 2025 January 28 – Strategic Work Session (2 of 2) (4:30-8:30PM) *Conflicts* February 7-8, 2025 Elected Leaders Institute – Foundational Program (Mankato) February 13, 2025 February 21-22, 2025 Elected Leaders Institute – Foundational/Advanced Program (Plymouth) February 27, 2025 March 13, 2025 March 27, 2025 April 10, 2025 April 24, 2025 May 8, 2025 May 22, 2025 June 12, 2025 June 23, 2025* (TBD – Moved for League of Minnesota Cities Conference) (NOTE: Monday) June 25-27, 2025 League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference (Duluth) July 10, 2025 July 24, 2025 August 14, 2025 August 28, 2025 September 11, 2025 Agenda Item: 11.2 September 25, 2025 October 9, 2025 October 16, 2025 November 13, 2025 November 24, 2025* (NOTE: Monday) December 11, 2025