Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2024-09-26 City Council Agenda Packet Part 3
Corcoran City Council Agenda September 26, 2024, 7:00 pm a. NAL 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval 4. Presentations a. Mark Reinking – 5 years (Public Works) b. Joe Zerwas – 20 years (Public Safety) c. Northland – Long-term Financial Plan 5. Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6. Consent Agenda a. Financial Claims September 26, 2024 b. 2023-05-11 DRAFT Council Minutes c. 2023-08-24 DRAFT Council Work Session Minutes d. 2023-08-24 DRAFT Council Minutes e. 2023-09-14 DRAFT Council Work Session Minutes f. 2023-09-28 DRAFT Council Minutes g. 2023-10-12 DRAFT Council Minutes h. 2023-10-12 DRAFT Council Work Session Minutes i. 2023-10-26 DRAFT Council Minutes j. 2023-10-26 DRAFT Council Work Session Minutes k. 2023-11-06 DRAFT Special Council Meeting Minutes l. 2023-11-09 DRAFT Council Minutes m. 2023-11-20 DRAFT Council Minutes n. 2023-12-18 DRAFT Council Minutes o. REMOVED 2024-07-25 DRAFT Council Minutes p. 2024-08-08 DRAFT Council Minutes q. 2024-08-08 DRAFT Council Work Session Minutes r. 2024-09-12 DRAFT Council Minutes s. Heather Meadows Final Plat t. Heather Meadows Early Grading u. Upward Acres Final Plat v. Upward Acres Early Grading w. Slabaugh Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Variance x. Tavera 7 FP/FPUD y. Long-Term Financial Management Plan z. Finance Director Services Contract aa. IT Manager Job Description and Hiring bb. Communications Specialist Job Description and Hiring cc. Hennepin County Youth Sport Grant - Equipment dd. Water Tower – Pay Request 14 ee. Water Tower – Pay Request 17 ff. Trail Haven Bridge Replacement – Pay Request 3 & FINAL gg. NE Trunk Infrastructure improvements – Pay Request 1 hh. Water Treatment Plant – Pay Request 16 HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Council meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 821 6350 4979 Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84587541654 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 845 8754 1654 *Please note in-person comments will be taken at the scheduled meeting where noted. Comments received via email to City Administrator Tobin at jtobin@corcoranmn.gov or via public comment cards will also be accepted. All email and public comment cards must be received by the Wednesday prior to scheduled Council meeting. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov * Corcoran City Council Agenda September 26, 2024, 7:00 pm ii. Stieg Road Improvements – Pay Request 1 jj. Toward Zero Deaths Grant kk. ADDED Police Resignation and Hiring Process Authorization 7. Planning a. Public Hearing. Slabaugh Easement Vacation b. Public Hearing. Heather Meadows 2 nd Easement Vacation c. Public Hearing. Hope Meadows ROW d. Domino’s e. Schutte/Streeter Rezoning Concept f. M&J Wine Tasting Room Concept Plan 8. Unfinished Business -- Public Comment Opportunity 9. New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a. North Hennepin Pioneer Society Request for Funds in 2025 10. Council Reports a. Planning Project Update 11. 2024 City Council Schedule 12. Closed Session a. City Center - Easement 13. Adjournment Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7a. City Council Meeting: September 26, 2024 Prepared By: Natalie Davis McKeown Topic: Slabaugh Addition Easement Vacation (PID 10-119-23-21-0013 and 10-119-23-21-0014) (City File No. 24-029) Action Required: Decision 60-Day Review Deadline:October 11, 2024 1.Application Request The applicant, Gideon Slabaugh, requests approval of a vacation of drainage and utility (D&U) easements that follow the perimeter of previously established lot lines. 2. Analysis As a part of the Slaubaugh Addition final plat, a condition of approval is to vacate D&U easements established with the previous plat – Ebert Addition. These easements are no longer necessary, and new perimeter D&U easements will be established in the new final plat. The final plat for Slabaugh Addition is on the consent agenda for the September 26, 2024, meeting. The easement vacation will be filed with the final plat that dedicates new perimeter easements. 3. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2024-104 approving the easement vacation of Slabaugh Addition. Attachments: 1.Resolution 2024-104 Approving the Easement Vacation for Slabaugh Addition (includes the Easement Vacation Exhibit). 2.City Engineer’s Memo Dated August 26, 2024. Figure 1 Site Location City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-104 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR “SLABAUGH ADDITION” ON THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 9925 EBERT ROAD AND 9945 EBERT ROAD (PID 10-119-23-21-0013 AND 10-119-23-21-0014) (CITY FILE NO. 24-029) WHEREAS, Gideon Slabaugh (“the applicant”) requests vacation of drainage and utility easements located within the subdivision; WHEREAS, the applicant requested vacation of the existing easements legally described as follows: See Attachment A. WHEREAS, the applicant requested vacation of the existing easements as depicted on Attachment B.. WHEREAS, notice of the Public Hearing was mailed to all landowners of property directly abutting the area to be vacated and to all utility companies serving the area; WHEREAS, notice of the Public Hearing was published in the official newspaper; WHEREAS, the City Council considered this time at a duly called Public Hearing; WHEREAS, the City finds that the existing drainage and utility easements are no longer required as new easements will be dedicated with the plat for Slabaugh Addition; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the requested easement vacation, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the vacation is contingent upon approval of the final plat for “Slabaugh Addition” and dedication of new easements. 2. The applicant must record this Resolution approving the vacation at Hennepin County. 3. Proof of recording must be submitted to the City. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-104 Page 2 of 4 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of September 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Deb Johnson – City Clerk City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-104 Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT A Easement Release Legal Description: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, of Slabaugh Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said lot; thence north 83 degrees 29 minutes 24 seconds west along the north line of said lot, 160.80 feet to an iron monument being the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1 of Ebert Addition; thence south 01 degrees 36 minutes 36 seconds west along the west line of Lot 2, Block 1, of Ebert Addition, 10.04 feet to the point of beginning; thence north 83 degrees 29 minutes 24 seconds west, 10.04 feet; thence south 01 degrees 36 minutes 36 seconds west, 433.31 feet; thence southeasterly, a distance of 20.54 feet, along a non-tangential curve, concave to the south, having a central angle of 01 degrees 29 minutes 10 seconds, a radius of 791.76 feet, a chord bearing of south 75 degrees 15 minutes 58 seconds east, and a chord length of 20.54 feet; thence north 01 degrees 36 minutes 36 seconds east non-tangential to said curve, 436.25 feet, thence north 83 degrees 29 minutes 24 seconds west, 10.04 feet to the point of beginning. Said easement containing 0.10 acres more or less, and is subject to all easements, restrictions, and reservations of record, if any. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-104 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT B Memo To:Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From:Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE, Client Manager Project:Slabaugh Easement Vacation Date:August 26, 2024 Summary The vacation of the existing easement for Slabaugh plat has no impact on City infrastructure. Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7b. City Council Meeting: September 26, 2024 Prepared By: Natalie Davis McKeown Topic: Heather Meadows 3rd Addition Easement Vacation (PIDs 05-119-23-31-0001; 05-119-23-32-0001; 08- 119-23-22-0011) (City File No. 24-032) Action Required: Decision 60-Day Review Deadline: November 3, 2024 1. Application Request The applicant, Markus Lee of ML Unlimited LLC, requests vacation of drainage and utility (D&U) easements that follow the perimeter of previously established lot lines. 2. Analysis As a part of the Heather Meadows 3rd Addition final plat, a condition of approval is to vacate previously established D&U easements established with Heather Meadows 2nd Addition. These easements are no longer necessary based on the new property lines. New perimeter D&U easements will be established in the new final plat. The final plat for Heather Meadows 3rd Addition is on the consent agenda for the September 26, 2024, meeting. The easement vacation will be filed with the plat that dedicates the new easements. 3. Recommendation Figure 1 Site Location Page 2 of 2 Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2024-100 approving the easement vacation for Heather Meadows 3rd Addition. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2024-100 Approving the Easement Vacation for Heather Meadows 3rd Addition (including the Easement Vacation Exhibit). 2. City Engineer’s Memo Dated September 11, 2024. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-100 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR “HEATHER MEADOWS 3RD ADDITION” ON THE PROPERTIES LOCATED NEAR OAKDALE DRIVE AND HEATHER LANE (PID 05-119-23-31-0001; 05-119-23-32-0001; AND 08-119-23-22-0011) (CITY FILE NO. 24-032) WHEREAS, Markus Lee and ML Unlimited, LLC (“the applicant”) request vacation of drainage and utility easements located within the subdivision; WHEREAS, the applicant requested vacation of the existing easements legally described as follows: See Attachment A. WHEREAS, the applicant requested vacation of the existing easements as depicted on Attachment B. WHEREAS, notice of the Public Hearing was mailed to all landowners of property directly abutting the area to be vacated and to all utility companies serving the area; WHEREAS, notice of the Public Hearing was published in the official newspaper; WHEREAS, the City Council considered this time at a duly called Public Hearing; WHEREAS, the City finds that the existing drainage and utility easements are no longer required as new easements will be dedicated with the plat for Heather Meadows 3rd Addition; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the requested easement vacation, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the vacation is contingent upon approval of the final plat for “Heather Meadows 3rd Addition” and dedication of new easements. 2. The applicant must record this Resolution approving the vacation at Hennepin County. 3. Proof of recording must be submitted to the City. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-100 Page 2 of 4 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of September 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Deb Johnson – City Clerk City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-100 Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT A Legal Description of Easements to be Vacated: All of the drainage and utilities as depicted on the recorded plat of HEATHER MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota that lie within Outlot A of said HEATHER MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-100 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT B Memo To:Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From:Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project:Heather Meadows 2nd Addition Easement Vacation Date:September 11, 2024 Summary The vacation of the existing easements for Heather Meadows 2nd Addition has no impact on City infrastructure. Necessary easements for the development will be dedicated with the Final Plat of 3rd Addition. Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7c. City Council Meeting: September 26, 2024 Prepared By: Natalie Davis McKeown Topic: Hope Meadows Right-of-Way Vacation (City File No. 24-025) Action Required: Decision Review Deadline: October 7, 2024 1. Request The applicant, Hope Community Development, LLC, requests a vacation of right-of-way (ROW) along Hunters Ridge and Oswald Farm Road. The existing ROW will ultimately be replaced with new ROW that will allow for the “Y” intersection to be improved to a four- way, 90-degrees intersection. 2. Background As part of the Hope Meadows final plat approved at the September 12, 2024, regular City Council meeting, a condition of approval required vacating existing ROW in favor of new ROW as shown on the final plat that will allow for an improved, four-way intersection entering into the neighborhood from County Road 116. The City Council initiated the ROW vacation process with the conditional approval of the final plat. A road easement will be placed over the existing roadway as an interim measure. Once the new intersection is fully constructed, the road easement can be vacated. The ROW vacation and road easement will be filed with the plat that dedicates the new easements. 3. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2024-105 approving the ROW vacation for Hope Meadows. Because this is a ROW/road vacation initiated by the City, a super majority vote (4/5) is required for approval. Attachments 1. Resolution 2024-105 Approving the Easement Vacation for Hope Meadows (including the ROW Vacation Exhibit). Figure 1 Site Location Page 2 of 2 2. City Engineer’s Memo Dated September 17, 2024. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-105 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR “HOPE MEADOWS” SUBDIVISION (CITY FILE NO. 24-025) WHEREAS, Hope Community Development, LLC (“the applicant”) requested approval of right-of- way vacation along Hunters Ridge and Oswald Farm Road within the subdivision; WHEREAS, the applicant requested vacation of the right-of-way legally described and depicted as follows: See Attachment A. WHEREAS, the Corcoran City Council considered this item at a Public Hearing; WHEREAS, notice of the Public Hearing was mailed to all landowners of property directly abutting the area to be vacated and to all utility companies serving the area; WHEREAS, notice of the Public Hearing was published in the official newspaper; WHEREAS, the City finds that the existing right-of-way is no longer required as new right-of-way will be dedicated to allow for an improved intersection with the plat for Hope Meadows; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the requested right-of-way vacation, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the vacation is contingent upon approval of the final plat for Hope Meadows and dedication of new right-of-way and drainage and utility easements. 2. Approval of the vacation is contingent upon a road easement to cover the existing roadway which must remain in place until the new intersection and roadway is constructed. 3. The applicant must record the following with Hennepin County and provide proof of recording: a. Resolution approving the vacation at Hennepin County. b. Road Easement 4. The applicant must record the resolution approving the vacation with the final plat for Hope Meadows. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-105 Page 2 of 4 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of September 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jason (Jay) Tobin City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-105 Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT A City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-105 Page 4 of 4 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Hope Development Right of Way Vacation Date: September 17, 2024 Summary We have no issues with the vacation of the existing Right of Way for the Hope Development. Necessary easements and Right of Way for the development will be dedicated with the 1st Addition of the Hope Development. Page 1 of 14 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7d. Council Meeting: September 26, 2024 Prepared By: Dwight Klingbeil Topic: Domino’s Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance 20115 and 20121 County Road 10 (PID 23-119-23-43-0003 & 23-119-23-43-0004) (City File No. 24-027) Action Required: Recommendation 1. Application Request Strack Construction Company on behalf of College Town Pizza requests approval of a Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance for a take-out only Domino’s pizza at 20115 and 20121 County Road 10. 2. Background Concept Plan Council reviewed a conceptual version of this application at the May 21, 2024, regular meeting. Council provided feedback on the color choice of the façade and expressed general support of a sign variance request to allow for additional wall signage in lieu of a freestanding sign. Lot Consolidation The current condition of the site consists of two separate properties, 20115 County Road 10 (the former location of the 10-50 Club) and 20121 County Road 10 (the former location of the Corcoran Meat Locker). In order to develop a drive-through restaurant on this site, the applicant requested approval of a lot consolidation. Section 926 of the City Code allows lot consolidations to be approved administratively. Staff reviewed the application and found that it satisfied the requirements for the consolidation. Staff administratively approved this portion of the request on July 16, 2024. The applicant must record the lot consolidation with Hennepin County for the approval to be finalized. 3. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the CUP and variance during a regularly scheduled meeting on September 5, 2024. Two members of the public spoke Figure 1 Site Location Page 2 of 14 during the public hearing, and expressed concerns regarding glare from vehicle headlights, noise pollution from vehicles, the size of the wall sign, and lack of screening. The commission motioned to recommend approval of the site plan, CUP, and variance requests with the condition that trees along County Road 10 be shifted north to screen residential structures in the Rush Creek Reserve neighborhood. The Commission also expressed interest in exploring a mural-style wrap for the vinyl siding around the walk-in cooler. 4. Context Zoning and Land Use The two parcels, with a combined total 0.52 acres, are guided Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan and zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-1). The property is in the Southeast District. The site includes the two buildings for the previous uses: the Corcoran Meat Locker and the 10-50 Club. Surrounding Properties The properties to the north, east and south are also guided Commercial and zoned C-1. The property to the west is the City Park, which is guided Parks/Open Space and zoned Public Institutional (P-I). Natural Characteristics of the Site The Comprehensive Plan identifies no significant natural features on site. However, the west parcel is entirely in the shoreland overlay district (unnamed creek Henn_9228, located on the park property) and a portion of the east parcel is also in the district. 5. Analysis Staff reviewed the application for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo, and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a site plan and conditional use permit is limited to whether the plan meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the site plan and/or conditional use permit. The City has a higher discretion with a variance, as the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. Conditions can be applied to mitigate the impact of granting the variance. Figure 2: Zoning Map Page 3 of 14 B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Site Plan The request is for approval of a site plan for a take-out only Domino’s restaurant in the C-1 district. The proposal includes a 1,125 square-foot building on a 0.52-acre lot, with a drive-through and off-street parking spaces. Lot Analysis Lot standards for the C-1 district are as follows: Minimum lot area: Single-tenant building 25,000 square feet Multi-tenant building 1 acre Minimum lot width 100 feet Minimum lot depth 200 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet Front, From all other streets 25 feet Side 20 feet Rear 20 feet Adjacent to Residential 50 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet Figure 3: Site Plan Page 4 of 14 Maximum Building Size 50,000 square feet Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage 80% *Major Roadways are State Highways and County Roads. The existing lots do not comply with these standards and are legal, non-conforming. The combined lots will result in a 22,655 square-foot parcel excluding the right-of-way, that reduced the extent of nonconformity in minimum lot dimensions. The proposed impervious surface area would reduce the existing 19,469 square feet of impervious surface area (53.9% lot coverage) to 17,074 square feet (47.3% of lot coverage). Since the degree of nonconformities are decreased by these changes, a variance is not needed. Location and Building Setbacks The proposed building is setback 30 ft from the south property line (along County Road 50) and 51 ft from the northeast property line (along County Road 10). The proposed setbacks along both County Roads do not comply and will require a variance from these standards since this is a new building. The setback from the northwest property line is 46 ft, which complies with the minimum rear setback of 20 ft and eliminates the building encroachment onto the City Park parcel. Parking lot drive aisles are subject to a 100-foot setback from County Road frontages (this can be reduced to 25 ft with additional landscaping) and a 10-foot setback from interior property lines. The drive aisle for the parking lot is setback 5 ft from all sides of the property. There is off-street parking located on the northeast and northwest portion of the property. The parking spaces are setback from the interior northwest property line by 22.6 ft. However, the parking on the northeast portion of the site only has a 5-foot setback from the road easement. A variance is required to allow the drive aisle and parking as shown. Building Size, Height, and Architecture The site currently consists of two structures that have a cumulative footprint of roughly 7,194 sq. ft. The applicant plans to demolish these two structures and construct a 1,120 sq. ft. building. The design for the building plan features a flat roof with three staggered heights. At its tallest point it is 20 ft, which complies with the 35 ft height limit for the C-1 district. The building is unique as there is no customer access to the building. Customers will either approach the drive- through on the south or the walk-up Figure 4: Building Rendering Page 5 of 14 window on the north. The building materials consist of coal colored stone, prefinished slate lap siding, metal accents, black fiber cement siding, and vinyl siding around the cooler. City Code allows for stone, lap siding, and fiber siding for building materials. City Code also allows for metal siding so long as it does not exceed 20% wall coverage in non-residential districts. Other materials may be allowed if deemed appropriate by the Zoning Administrator. This includes the vinyl siding around the walk-in cooler. Staff found this to be an appropriate material, but the Planning Commission discussed the potential of approving this material with a mural-style wrap over the vinyl siding. The applicant provided a sample image from a similar cooler for the Council’s consideration. Overall, the proposed materials comply with City standards. Parking & Drive Aisle Under Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance, the minimum number of parking stalls required for a restaurant with a floor area of 963 sq. ft. is 8 parking stalls. The site plan shows 13 parking stalls, which complies with the minimum requirements of the zoning ordinance. However, the submitted plans do not comply with the minimum dimension requirements for parking stalls. The parking stalls on site have an angle of 60 degrees, which requires a stall width of 10.33 ft, line length of 22 ft, stall depth of 19 ft, and a drive aisle width of 16 ft. The plans submitted by the applicant show parking stall dimensions of 9 ft, stall length of line of 21 ft, dimension the parking stall width of 9 ft, stall length of line of 21 ft, and a drive aisle that is less than 16 ft. in certain spots. A variance is required to allow the proposed parking dimensions. Access The plan shows a single access point onto County Road 10. This replaces two existing access points on County Road 10 and two on County Road 50. Additionally, the proposal will remove on-street parking on County Road 10 and provide off-street parking for employees and customers. An infrastructure feasibility study for this project was completed in June of this year. This study found that the consolidation of access points was a significant improvement over the current conditions of the site. Additionally, with County Road 50 having a stopped condition at the intersection with County Road 10, it is the preferred street for the entrance location. The site does not offer much space for vehicles to que in line for the drive-through. However, unlike the typical drive-through, the proposed restaurant would not allow drive up orders and would require all orders to be placed ahead of time. Because of this, staff does not anticipate queuing to be a concern for this type of use. Hennepin County will ultimately control and permit the access to the site. Lighting Section 1060.040 of the City Code restricts the maximum glare of lighting fixtures to 1 foot-candle as measured from the property line. The revised photometric plan complies Page 6 of 14 with this standard, and all glare at and beyond the property line is less than 1 foot- candle. The applicant provided a specification for the lighting fixtures used on the site. Code requires light fixtures and freestanding luminaries to have a cutoff angle that is 90 degrees or less. The spec sheet provided complies with this standard. Additionally, the height limit of freestanding luminaries cannot exceed a height of 30 ft or the height of the roofline, whichever is less. The building is shown to be 20 ft. at its highest point. Therefore, exterior lighting cannot be taller than 20 ft. The submitted spec sheet indicates freestanding light poles with a height of 18 ft, which complies with this standard. Landscaping The site is subject to the landscape standards in Section 1060.070 which requires the following: • One overstory tree per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross building floor area or one tree per 50 lineal ft. of site perimeter, whichever is greater. The site perimeter is 740 ft., which would require 15 overstory trees to be planted on site. The plan shows 22 overstory trees. • One understory shrub for each 300 sq. ft. of building or one tree per 30 lineal ft. of site perimeter, whichever is greater. The site perimeter is 740 ft., which would require 25 shrubs to be planted. The plan shows a total of 35 understory shrubs. Of the trees planted, code requires no more than 33% of the required number of trees to be one species. The revised landscaping plan breaks down the quantity of each species of coniferous and deciduous overstory trees. In total, there are four species of overstory trees being planted: 5 Black Hills White Spruce, 6 Sugar Maple, 6 Birch, and 5 Honey Locusts. None of the planned species exceed 33% of the required number of trees. The minimum plant size requirements for shrubs shall be 3-4 ft. high. The revised landscaping plan includes 31 shrubs that would comply with this height requirement. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance requests with the condition that trees along County Road 10 be shifted northwesterly, to provide additional screening to the Rush Creek Reserve neighborhood. Rather than shifting trees along County Road 10, the applicant revised their landscaping plan to plant additional 4 overstory trees and 4 additional understory shrubs to provide the additional screening. Signage Page 7 of 14 The applicant submitted two sign plans for the site. The first sign plan includes a 32 sq-ft tile and a 55.49 sq ft sign on the north façade of the building. These signs would cover 7.2% of the wall face, where 10% is allowed. Additionally, Sign Plan Option 1 also includes a 64 square foot, 16’ tall freestanding sign on the corner of County Road 50 and County Road 10. Code allows a freestanding sign on the site, but this creates a less-than-ideal situation near the corner of two County Roads. Alternatively, the applicant submitted an additional sign plan, which removes the freestanding sign, reduces the area of the wall signs on the north façade to 44.5 square feet (3.66% of building face), and adds wall signs on the south (44.5 square feet, 3.66% of building face) and east (15.76 square feet or 5.32% of building face) facades. Chapter 84 of the City Code only allows an individual wall sign on the primary face of the building, so this alternate sign plan would require approval of a variance from these standards. Grading and Drainage City Engineers had a chance to review the submitted grading plan and have incorporated their comments into the attached staff report. In their review, they recommended that that drainage swales maintain a minimum slope of 2%. The grading shown in the swale on County Road 50 is shown to be 1.31%, engineers recommend incorporating an additional drain tile for these flatter areas. It was also noted that the drainage along County Road 10 will need to be reviewed more extensively, as the area appears to be flat and may trap water. The complete analysis of the grading and drainage of this proposal can be found in the engineering memo dated August 22, 2024. Refuse Section 1060.020 requires all exterior storage of trash/garbage to be in an accessory building enclosed by walls and roof or in closed containers within a totally screened area. The applicant’s site plan and renderings include a trash enclosure west of the Figure 5: Freestanding sign from option 1 Figure 6: Requested wall sign flexibility from option 2 Page 8 of 14 building with doors facing north. This complies with the applicable screening requirements for refuse. Conditional Use Permit to allow a Drive-Through business Drive-through businesses are allowed as a conditional use in the C-1 district. Section 1070.020 of the Zoning Ordinance outlines general evaluation criteria for CUPs. In order to grant a CUP, the CUP standards of Section 1070.020 Subd. 3 must be met: a. Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. Granting the CUP for a new take-out only Domino’s restaurant aligns with Goal 3 of the Land Use Chapter in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which is to create new land use opportunities to expand and diversify the City’s tax base by encouraging new commercial development. b. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will promote and enhance the public welfare as it will revitalize a neighborhood commercial site at the intersection of two county roads. The use also provides several improvements compared to the current site. The requested use would eliminate on-street parking along County Road 10, eliminate non-conforming building setback from the northwestern property line, and would eliminate building encroachment onto City Park property. c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. Assuming the recommended conditions of approval are adopted, staff does not find reason to believe the CUP for the drive-through would be injurious to the use and enjoyment of the surrounding properties for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Page 9 of 14 The establishment of the conditional use will likely not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. e. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Adequate public facilities are available to accommodate the proposed commercial use as confirmed in the feasibility study completed for the project. The applicant shall be responsible for improvements to accommodate the site. f. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. The site generally conforms to the applicable regulations of the C-1 district. While variances are requested and required, the proposed use will allow for several improvement to the existing conditions on a site that is challenging due to its triangular shape and county road frontages on two of three sides. Additionally, the direct access on to a County Road is ideal for the proposed use. g. The conditional use and site conform to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. The conditional use and site generally conform to the performance standards found within the Zoning Ordinance. Areas of the site that do not conform to required performance standards will need to be addressed with a variance. A condition of approval for the CUP is that the proposed variances are either granted or plans must be revised to conform to the Ordinance as written. In addition to the CUP standards, drive-through businesses must also comply with the standards found in Section 1060.060 Subd. 12: a. The business shall be located on a site with direct access to a minor arterial street, collector or service road. The business will have direct access to County Road 50, which is a minor connector road and meets this standard. b. Drive-Through Lanes: Drive-through or drive-in lanes are not allowed between the building and a lot line that faces a public street. This does not pertain to driveways. The proposed drive-through is in between the building and a public street, and will require approval of a variance. Page 10 of 14 c. All portions of the business with drive through facilities, including but nont limited to, the building in which they are located, service windows and stacking spaces, shall be separated from residentially zoned or guided property by an arterial or collector street or shall be set back at least 300 feet from residentially zoned or guided property. All portions of the business will be setback at least 300 feet from any residentially zoned or guided property. d. The public address or order system shall not be audible from any adjacent residentially zoned or guided property. This type of drive-through does not have a public address system, as orders are placed ahead either online or over the phone. e. Adequate stacking distance shall be provided as determined by the City Engineer, which does not interfere with other driving areas, parking spaces, or sidewalks. Stacking spaces shall not interfere with parking spaces or traffic circulation. The infrastructure feasibility study notes that the business plan requires users to place orders ahead from their phone prior to picking up the order. This will result in vehicles not needing to que to order. The stacking space provided does not interfere with other driving areas, parking spaces, or sidewalks. f. The applicant shall demonstrate that such use will not significantly lower the existing level of service on streets and intersections. Staff has no reason to believe the use will significantly lower the existing level of service on streets and intersections. g. Screening shall be provided of automobile headlights in the drive-through lane to adjacent properties. Such screening shall be at least three feet (3’) in height and fully opaque, consisting of a wall, fence, dense vegetation, berm, or grade change. The landscaping plan provided shows a sufficient amount of trees and shrubs to screen vehicle headlights at the intersection of County Road 50 and County Road 10. However, the applicant must revise these plans to include a different species of coniferous shrubs to meet the minimum height requirement for this screening. Page 11 of 14 h. A bypass lane shall be provided for each drive-through use, allowing cars to leave the drive-through lane from the stacking area. A bypass lane is provided for vehicles to drive around any vehicle queued to pick up their order. Variance for reduced building, parking and drive-aisle setbacks The required building, parking and drive-aisle setbacks along major roads in the C-1 district is 100 feet. The applicant requested a variance to allow a 30-foot and 50-foot building setback, as well as a 5-foot parking & drive-aisle setback. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all variance standards from Section 1070.040, Subd. 2(B) are met with their request. A. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. E. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan F. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. There are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The site itself is unique in its shape, as two of its three lot lines front a county roadway. The setback from frontages along major roadways in the C-1 district is 100 ft. At its widest point, the site is 198 ft. wide. This means that the minimum setbacks from each frontage overlap one another, resulting in no buildable space on the site. While the City has a clause that allows setbacks to be reduced with additional landscaping, there is not enough space on the site to accommodate additional landscaping. These conditions are unique to this parcel and were not created by landowners nor the applicant. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality, as it would allow the applicant to develop a commercial site on the subject property. This is consistent with the previous use, as well as the guided use in the comprehensive plan. Page 12 of 14 The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the C-1 district is to provide establishment of single and multi- use commercial buildings at major intersections on small neighborhood scale sites where public sewer is available. The request would allow the applicant to develop a commercial restaurant at the intersection of two county roads, which is consistent with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. Variance for Drive-through between the building and County Road 50. Section 1060.060 of the Corcoran City Code prohibits placing drive-through lanes between a building and a lot line that faces a public street. The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from this standard to allow the installation of a drive-through lane on the south side of the property, between the building and County Road 50. Similar to the setback variance request, the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all variance standards from Section 1070.040, Subd. 2(B) are met with their request. There are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance standards. The site is unique as it only has one lot line that does not face a public street. The site is also limited by where the County is willing to permit access, and the location shown was set through discussions with the County. To allow for stacking, the drive aisle must wrap around the building. While it may be possible to install a drive- through lane on the west side of the property, this would create two possible conflicts with the zoning ordinance. If vehicles in the drive-through are oriented south toward County Road 50, vehicle headlights in the drive-through will shine onto the public road where the access is located. This would violate the standard in code which requires vehicle headlights in drive-throughs to be blocked by screening of a height of at least 3 ft. If the vehicles in the drive-through are oriented north, this may cause a stacking issue for the drive-through lane. The granting of this variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance, as it would allow for a commercial drive-through business in the C-1 district. The variance would allow for development of the site in a manner that is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. The landscaping plan shows landscaping between the drive aisle and County Road 50 to mitigate the impact of locating the drive-through lane between the street and the building. Variance for increased wall signage Chapter 84 of the City Code allows for a single wall sign on the primary entrance and a single freestanding sign, which cannot exceed 64 sq. ft. in copy area and 16 ft. in height. Due to the narrowness of the site, and the possibility of additional right-of-way being taken during future intersection improvement projects, the applicant is requesting Page 13 of 14 a variance from the wall sign limitation to allow wall signage on multiple faces of the building in lieu of a freestanding sign. Again, the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all variance standards from Section 1070.040, Subd. 2(B) are met with their request. There are practical difficulties complying with the sign standards on this site. Due to site size and location of the site, it is difficult to erect a freestanding sign that is not in the site visibility triangle for the intersection of County Road 50 and County Road 10. These conditions are unique to this site and were not created by the landowners nor the applicant. In order to have an adequate means of business identification, the applicant requests approval of wall signage on multiple faces of the building in lieu of a freestanding sign. Staff has no reason to believe the granting of this variation will alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance as it would provide an adequate means of business identification, while protecting the safety and welfare of the public by minimizing freestanding signs that would otherwise be hazardous to vehicles and pedestrians. The City may impose conditions to prevent any unsightly and chaotic signage on the site. These conditions may include sign copy area, brightness, quantity of wall signs and logo tiles, and restrictions on freestanding signs. Variance from Minimum Parking Dimension Requirements Section 1060.060 of the Corcoran City Code requires parking stalls with angles of 60 degrees to have the following minimum dimensions: 10.33 ft. stall width parallel to aisle, 22 ft. stall length of line, 19 ft. stall depth, and a 16’ aisle width. The applicant is requesting a variance from these standards to allow for a 9 ft. stall width, a 21 ft. length of line, and a minimum drive aisle of 13 ft. in certain spots. There are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance standards. The site is unique in its size and shape, which creates challenges in site layout while maintaining other requirements. The unique shape and size of the site was not created by the landowner or applicant. The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality, as it is improving the parking conditions of existing nonconforming parking spaces. The proposed variance is in harmony with the general purposes of the ordinance. The proposed variance does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, as would provide a sufficient amount of parking for a commercial use on a site that is guided for commercial use. There are several conditions of approval to be added with this variance. The applicant shall provide plans that clearly dimension the drive aisle width at its most narrow point for all three sides of the site. Based on staff measurements, at the narrowest points, the Page 14 of 14 drive aisle width on the northeast side of the property is 15 ft., and the drive aisle width on the northwest side of the property is 13 ft. It is worth noting that the traffic flow on the site will be one-way. Staff has researched other parking design guides, and it is not unheard of for drive aisles to be this narrow in one-way lots. With the consideration of the one-way traffic flow and the difficult site constraints, staff is comfortable allowing for the variance with a condition of approval that the drive aisle on the northeast portion of the property must be at least 15 ft wide. The parking stalls on the northwest side of the property are measured at roughly 55 degrees. Code allows for a minimum drive width of 12 ft. for parking stalls angled at 45 degrees. With consideration of the site constraints, the one-way traffic, and the parking angle between 45 and 60 degrees, staff is comfortable allowing the variance reducing the drive aisle width on this side to 13 ft. with a condition of approval that the drive aisle width on this side of the property by at least 13 ft. wide. Most of the stalls had a width of 9 ft. Staff is comfortable allowing a stall width of 9 ft for parking at the proposed angles. Staff noted at least two stalls that were narrower than that. A condition of approval should require any stall that is less than 9 ft wide be marked as a compact parking spot. Any compact parking spaces shall comply with the compact parking standards found in Section 1060.060 Subd. 4(C.3). Summary Staff reviewed the plans with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance and finds that the variance standards have been met and recommends approval. However, the Planning Commission can add conditions of approval to mitigate the impact of granting the variances or recommend denial should the Commission find the variance standards have not been met. 6. Recommendation Move to recommend approval of the resolutions approving the site plan, conditional use permit, and the variance requests. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2024-108 Approving the Site Plan & Conditional Use Permit 2. Resolution 2024-109 Approving the Variance from the setback standards and the sign standards 3. Engineering Memo dated August 22, 2024 4. Public Safety Memo dated August 7. 2024 5. Applicant Narrative 6. Civil Plans dated September 16, 2024 7. Building Renderings dated July 3, 2024 8. 911/Emergency Services Exhibit dated July 25, 2024 9. Sign Plan option 1 & 2 10. Vinyl Siding Wrap Example City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-108 Page 1 of 6 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH/WALK-OUT ONLY DOMINO’S PIZZA RESTURANT ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 50 & COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 23-119-23-43- 0004 & 23-119-23-43-0003) (CITY FILE NO. 24-027) WHEREAS, Strack Construction, Co. Inc. and College Town Pizza (“the applicant”) requests approval of a site plan and conditional use permit for to develop a drive-through and walk-out only Domino’s Restaurant, a commercial development on property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a site plan and conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. A site plan and conditional use permit are approved to allow for the construction of building addition as shown on the application received by the City on June 27, 2024 and revisions received on September 16, 2024, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the variance request to allow a drive-through to face the public street, reduced structural setbacks, and reduced parking setbacks for Domino’s. Otherwise plans shall be revised to conform to zoning standards. 3. Stormwater plans must be approved by Elm Creek Watershed Management Organization. 4. A conditional use permit is approved to allow a drive-through business, subject the following conditions and findings: a. Applicable criteria are satisfied as outlined in Section 1060.060 Subd. 12 (Drive Through Business). i. The business will have direct access to a minor collector street. ii. The business must receive approval of a variance to install a drive- through lane facing a public street or submit revised plans to comply with this standard. iii. All portions of the business are setback at least 300 ft. from residentially zoned or guided property. iv. The business will not have an order system that is audible from adjacent residentially zoned or guided property. v. Adequate stacking space is provided for an order-ahead drive-through business. vi. There is no reason to believe that the use will significantly lower the existing level of service on streets and intersections. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-108 Page 2 of 6 vii. Sufficient screening of automobile headlights in the drive-through will be provided based on the landscape plan submitted on July 3, 2024. viii. A bypass lane has been provided for the drive-through, allowing cars to leave the drive-through lane from the staking area. b. Applicable criteria are satisfied as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance. i. The use complies with the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. Granting the conditional use permit will create new land use opportunities to expand and diversify the City’s tax base by encouraging new commercial development. This satisfies Goal 3 of the Land Use chapter in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. ii. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will promote and enhance the public welfare as it will revitalize a neighborhood commercial site that is located at the intersection of two county roads that are currently unused. Additionally, consolidation of access points and removal of on-street parking on County Road 10 would be beneficial to traffic safety in the area and would enhance the general public welfare. iii. The drive-through business will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, and property values of surrounding properties. The City does not have reason to believe the drive-through business would be injurious to the use and enjoyment of the surrounding properties for the purposes already permitted in the C-1 district, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. iv. The establishment of the drive-through business with the above listed conditions will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. v. Adequate public facilities can be reasonably provided to accommodate commercial use as confirmed in the feasibility study completed for the project. The applicant shall be responsible for improvements to accommodate the site. Reasonable modifications to the site design as required above will allow for emergency services to navigate the site. vi. The conditional use conforms or can reasonably conform with modifications included as conditions of approval, to the regulations of the C-1 zoning district and the Southeast District. vii. The commercial kennel and site can reasonably conform to performance standards as specified by the Zoning Ordinance with required modifications to the submitted plans. 5. Trees, shrubs, curb, retaining walls and other private improvement shall be located outside of the public street easement and drainage and utility easement. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-108 Page 3 of 6 a. If the City determines that encroachments are necessary, the applicant will be required to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City. 6. Any signage not in compliance with the standards in Chapter 84 of the City Code must receive approval of a variance from City Council and a sign permit for each sign prior to construction of the signs. 7. Prior to approval of the building permit, the plans must be revised to show the following: a. The landscaping plan must be modified to relocate the furthest south-west proposed tree to a minimum distance of 10’ from sanitary sewer alignment. b. Show vehicle tracks and vehicle swing separately on turning movement. c. Grading plan must be modified to contain the following: i. Clearly labeled EOF’s for all areas where water will be collected including all low areas in roadways and greenspaces. ii. Calculations for pipe capacity shall be provided to ensure a larger size isn’t necessary. iii. Drainage along County Road 10 appears to be flat and may trap water. d. Design and certification of all retaining walls exceeding 4’ in height. e. Detail of curb with concrete swale. f. On construction drawings, show pedestrian ramp designs for the site including spot elevations of landings and curb lines. g. Water and Sanitary Sewer i. Profile views for all utilities shall be provided with construction drawings. ii. Move water service to the property lot line and confirm if the shutoff will be a gate valve or more likely a curb stop. h. Typical section for parking lot i. Placement of mechanical equipment and/or utility service structures. i. These items must be screened in compliance with Section 1060.030 13. The applicant must either enter into an encroachment agreement for any improvements located within the County right-of-way. 14. The applicant must connect to municipal sanitary sewer. 15. As part of the application, the applicant must enter into a Site Improvement Performance Agreement to cover the public and private improvements for the project. This must be executed by the developer and the City, financial guarantees in place and fees paid. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-108 Page 4 of 6 16. A building permit is required prior to beginning construction. 17. FURTHER, the following conditions must be met prior to issuance of building permits: a. Record the approving final plat, resolutions and associated documents with Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. b. The applicant shall submit any and all necessary permits to the watershed and receive approval and provide proof of permits to the City. c. Plans must be submitted to confirm the metal roof material for the front porch overhang meets the following standards: i. Compliance with the MN State Building Code. ii. Has a high-quality commercial thickness/weight. 18. FURTHER, the following conditions must be met prior to release of remaining escrow: a. Any request for the City to inspect the required landscaping in order to reduce financial guarantees must be accompanied by recertification/verification of field inspection by the project Landscape Architect. A letter signed by the project Landscape Architect verifying plantings (including wetland and pond buffers) have been correctly installed in compliance with the plans and specifications will suffice. 19. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use and completes the required improvements. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-108 Page 5 of 6 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of September 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jason (Jay) Tobin City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-108 Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENT A That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as beginning at the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter; thence West along the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 252.5 feet; thence North 42 degrees 55 minutes East (assuming the South line of said Southeast Quarter as bearing East and West) 207.9 feet; thence South 42 degrees 20 minutes East 167.9 fee to the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South along said East line 28 feet to the point of beginning. AND That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, described as beginning at a point in the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, distant 252,5 feet West from the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 42 degrees 55 minutes East (assuming the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter as bearing East and West) 207.9 feet; thence North 42 degrees 20 minutes West 78.10 feet to an intersection with a line bearing North 35 degrees 26 minutes West to an intersection with a line bearing North 22 degrees 47 minutes East, from a point on said South line distant 312,03 feet West form the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 33 degrees 47 minutes West to said South line; thence Eat along said South line 59.53 feet to the point of beginning/ Hennepin County, Minnesota Torrens Property. AND The Southeasterly 4 feet of the Northeasterly 200 feet of that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 lying Southwesterly of County Road No. 10 and Northwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 252.5 feet West from the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 42 degrees 55 minutes East (assuming the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter as bearing East and West) 207.9 feet; thence North 42 degrees 20 minutes West 78.10 feet to the point of intersection with a line being North 35 degrees 26 minutes East from a point on the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 312.85 feet West from the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast corner, being the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 35 degrees 26 minutes West to an intersection with a line bearing North 33 degrees 47 minutes East from a point of said South line distant 312.03 feet West from the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 33 degrees 47 minutes West to said South line and there terminating, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-109 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THREE VARIANCES FOR “DOMINO’S” ON THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 50 AND COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 23-119-23-43-0004 & 23-119-23-43-0003) (CITY FILE NO. 24-027) WHEREAS, Strack Construction, Co. Inc. (“the applicant”) requests approval of a site plan, conditional use permit, and lot consolidation to develop a Domino’s preliminary plat for 60 residential lots, 1 amenity lot, and 5 outlots on property described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the applicant also requested approval of three variances from the underlying district standards, performance standards, and the sign standards; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for three variances subject to the following findings and conditions; 1.The requested variance from Section 1040.030, Subd. 8 to allow a 30’ front setback from County Road 50, and a 51’ front setback from County Road 10, and the request variance from Section 1060.060, Subd. 4 to allow 5’ parking and drive aisle setback is approved based on the following findings: a.That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant requests flexibility from the minimum front setback along major roadways. At its widest point, the setbacks for both County Roads overlap one another and engulf the site. b.That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcels of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowners. The subject property on a 0.52 acre site that is bordered by County Road 50 to the south and County Road 10 to the north. These constraints result in a lot design and structure placement restrictions that are unique to the project boundaries. c.That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variation will allow the applicant to develop a commercial use on the site which is consistent with the previous uses on the site. d.The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the C-1 district is to provide establishment of single and multi-use commercial buildings at major intersections. The request would allow the applicant to develop a commercial restaurant at the intersection of two county roads, which is consistent with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-109 Page 2 of 5 e.The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and re-establishes a commercial use on the site. 2.The requested variance from Section 1060.060, Subd. 12(B) to allow a drive-through lane between the building and a lot line that faces a public street is approved based on the following findings: a.That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance standards. The site only has one lot line that does not face a public street. Due to the access point on the site, installing a drive-through lane on that side of the lot would result in either vehicle headlight screening issues or vehicle queuing issues. b.That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The subject property only has one internal boundary line and is bordered by County Roads on all other boundary lines. These constraints result in a structure and drive-through lane that is unique to the project boundaries. c.That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. d.The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. e.The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as a deviation does not conflict with the Commercial land use guiding. 3.The requested variance from Chapter 84.05 (3.f) to allow wall signs on multiple faces of the building is approved based on the following findings: a.That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance standards. Due to the size of the site, and its proximity to two major roadway, it is difficult to erect a freestanding sign that is outside of the site visibility triangle. b.That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is south and were not created by the landowner. The subject property is a narrow site that fills much of the site visibility triangle in the intersection of County Road 50 and County Road 10. c.The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. d.The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance as it would provide an adequate means of business identification, while protecting the safety and welfare of the public by minimizing hazards to vehicles and pedestrians. e.The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-109 Page 3 of 5 f.The City may impose conditions that would limit the size, brightness, and quantity of wall signs, as well as restrict freestanding signs in an effort to prevent unsightly and chaotic signage of the site. 4.The requested variance from Section 1060.060, Subd. 4(C.2) to allow reduced stall widths, stall lengths, stall depth, and drive aisle width is approved based on the following findings: a.That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance standards. The size and shape of the site create practical difficulties in complying with the dimensional requirements for parking stalls while complying with other requirements of the ordinance. b.That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The 0.52-acre site is uniquely shaped as it only three boundary lines on a narrow parcel. The landowner did not create the unique conditions of the parcel. c.That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. d.The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. e.The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as the deviation would provide parking for a commercial user on a site that is guided for Commercial land use. f.The City imposes the following conditions for the variance from Section 1060.060, Subd. 4(C.2) i.The applicant must provide plans that clearly dimensions the narrowest point of the drive aisle on all three sides of the site. ii.The minimum drive aisle width on the northeast side of the site fronting County Road 10 shall be 15 ft. iii.The minimum drive aisle width on the northeast side of the site fronting the city park shall be 13 ft. iv.Any parking stall that is less than 9 ft. wide shall be marked as a compact space. Compact spaces shall comply with the standards found in Section 1060.060 Subd. 4(C.3). v.There shall be no more than two compact parking spaces on this site. 5.The applicant is required to record this resolution with the Hennepin County’s Recorder’s Office and provide proof of recording to the City. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-109 Page 4 of 5 McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of September 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jason (Jay) Tobin VOTING AYE VOTING NAY City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 5 of 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-109 ATTACHMENT A Parcel 1: The East 450.00 feet, as measured along the north and south lines, of the South 933.80 feet as measured at right angles to the south line, of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ of SW ¼) of Section 36, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel 2: The South 933.80 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ of SW ¼) of Section 36, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as measured at right angles to the south line thereof; except the East 450 feet as measured along the north and south lines thereof, and except that part thereof which lies West of a line parallel with and distant 40 feet East of the West line of said section. Abstract property. Parcel 3: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ of SW ¼), of Section 36, Township 119, Range 23, lying North of the South 933.80 feet as measured at right angles to the South line thereof. Except the West 450.00 feet of the North 200.00 feet as measured at right angles to the North and West lines thereof. Also except the West 40.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Domino’s of Corcoran Date: August 22, 2024 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents: 1. Certificate of Survey – Domino’s dated June 27, 2024 2. Civil Plans – Domino’s dated June 27, 2024. Comments: General: 1.Consistent with the review process, a comment response letter shall be provided in which the applicant provides a written response to each of the items below. 2. In addition to engineering comments, the proposed plans are subject to review by planning, and shall comply with all other City of Corcoran zoning, land-use and code requirements. 3. For any site activity (demo, grading, utilities, etc.) no closures or restrictions of any kind shall be imposed upon the public use of County Road 10 or County Road 50 without Hennepin County permission. 4. An encroachment agreement shall be required for all site improvements or items placed within the City ROW or easements. This would include the utility services extended into the park. 5. Final civil construction plans shall include all Corcoran standard detail plates that pertain to construction which is to take place. 6. Development shall be responsible for identifying and mitigating all environmental cleanup from the site, if necessary, including areas in which previous uses had encroached onto the City park. Provide the site with any Phase 1 or subsequent environmental reports for the property. Plat: 1.The applicant shall provide a 5’ drainage and utility easement per City Code along the west property boundary. 2. ROW is typically not provided with a lot consolidation. The site plan identifies an existing 66-foot right of way per Hennepin County State Aid Highway Plats. 3. We would recommend a 10’ utility easement be provided beyond the 66-foot right of way to accommodate small utilities. Attachment 7d3. August 9, 2024 Domino’s Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director Page 2 of 3 Erosion Control/SWPPP 1. The site should implement appropriate erosion prevention and sediment control measures on grading plan such as a rock construction entrance, bio logs for swales, silt fence, and flared end inlet protection. 2. As the site plan is less than 1 acre a SWPPP is not anticipated to be necessary with this project. Site Plans 1. Work will require a Hennepin County permit for access and Hennepin County shall review and approve all work along their roadways. 2. All sidewalk shall be a minimum of 5’ in width. 3. Typical section for parking lot shall shown on plans. 4. Furthest south-west proposed tree must be minimum of 10’ from sanitary sewer alignment. 5. Show vehicle tracks and vehicle swing separately on turning movement. There are locations where the vehicle is outside the pavement and it should be confirmed if this is just the swing of the vehicle. 6. Provide confirmation from Hennepin County that trees are to be allowed to be planted in the Hennepin County ROW. Grading/Stormwater 1. Label clearly on plans EOF’s for all areas where water will be collected including all low areas in roadways and greenspaces. 2. All drainage swales should maintain a minimum of 2% slope and all slope should be 4:1 or flatter unless approved by the city engineer. Grading shown in the swale along CR50 is shown to be 1.31%. if flatter grades are incorporated draintile should be added to ensure areas drain. 3. Pipe under driveway entrance shall be minimum of 15”. Calculations for pipe capacity shall be provided to ensure that larger size isn’t necessary. 4. Review drainage along County Road 10. Area appears to be flat and may trap water. 5. All walls higher than 4’ shall be designed by a certified engineer and the design and certification of those walls shall be provided to the city. 6. Provide detail of curb with concrete swale. A curbing may need to be added to swale to ensure it contains runoff and doesn’t erode along edges. 7. On construction drawings, show pedestrian ramp designs for the site including spot elevations of landings and curb lines. Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. Profile views for all utilities shall be provided with construction drawings. Modification to sewer and water elevations may be necessary depending on profiles. 2. Sewer service should be 6” until property line where it can be reduced to 4”. The City has required larger services for its commercial properties to ensure that redevelopment in the future has minimal interruption to trunk infrastructure. 3. Move water service to the property lot line. Confirm if the shutoff will be a gate valve or more likely a curb stop. August 9, 2024 Domino’s Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director Page 3 of 3 4. There are many park elements within the utility alignment that are not shown on the site plan including a portion of the baseball field and significant riprap armoring of the creek. These shall be identified on the plans and the contractor shall be responsible for restoring all elements in a timely manner. Because this is an active park use, the timing of certain construction activities may be limited by the city to ensure minimal disruption to the park and its programming. 5. Hydrant spacing to be reviewed by public safety with final construction plans. 6. If fire protection is necessary for the building a separate fire and water service shall be provided with individual shutoff valves prior to the building. 7. If larger water service is required that can’t be accomplished with a service saddle, the tee must be cut in. 8. Ensure sanitary sewer manhole location is not in wheel path. 9. Applicant is proposing to create a drop structure with the manhole. The City requires that drop structures be lined with a spray in liner if retrofitted. End of Comments Page 1 of 1 Attachment 7d4. MEMO Date: August 7, 2024 To: Planning (Community Development Director Davis McKeown and Planner Klingbeil) From: Lieutenant Burns Re: City File 24-027 Domino’s Lot Consolidation, Site Plan, CUP, & Variance A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on August 7, 2024, to review the submitted application for the Domino’s Lot Combination, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance. In attendance were the following: Police Chief Gottschalk, Lieutenant Burns, Fire Chief Malewicki, Building Official Rosenau, Construction Services Supervisor Prichard, Planner Klingbeil, and Community Development Director Davis McKeown. The comments below are based on the materials submitted on July 3, July 16, July 25, and July 29, 2024. 1. No additional comments aside from those made in the Public Safety Memo dated May 1, 2024. These comments include: a. With the current site design, a fire truck will not be able to enter the site. However, standing could be provided from the county roads. b. There likely will be no sprinkler requirement for the building, but an audio/visual alarm will be required due to the kitchen hood. Page 1 of 1 MEMO Date: August 7, 2024 To: Planning (Community Development Director Davis McKeown and Planner Klingbeil) From: Lieutenant Burns Re: City File 24-027 Domino’s Lot Consolidation, Site Plan, CUP, & Variance A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on August 7, 2024, to review the submitted application for the Domino’s Lot Combination, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance. In attendance were the following: Police Chief Gottschalk, Lieutenant Burns, Fire Chief Malewicki, Building Official Rosenau, Construction Services Supervisor Prichard, Planner Klingbeil, and Community Development Director Davis McKeown. The comments below are based on the materials submitted on July 3, July 16, July 25, and July 29, 2024. 1.No additional comments aside from those made in the Public Safety Memo dated May 1, 2024. These comments include: a.With the current site design, a fire truck will not be able to enter the site. However, standing could be provided from the county roads. b.There likely will be no sprinkler requirement for the building, but an audio/visual alarm will be required due to the kitchen hood. Attachment 7d4. Conditional Use Permit Application Narrative We are applying for a Conditional Use Permit to build and operate a drive-through business within a C-1, Neighborhood Commercial zoned area. There will be minimal to no impact on the surrounding properties, and all necessary precautions will be taken during construction to reduce and/or eliminate any impacts on the surrounding area. The project will consist of demolition of the existing buildings to make way for the re-development of a new free standing (1,000 sf ±) Dominos pizza drive-through, take-out only store. As part of the demolition, the contractor will coordinate the abandonment of the septic system and sealing of well on-site. The business owner expects 4-6 employees per shift. The hours of operation will be from 10 am to Midnight seven days a week. Once the store is open for business, the owner may choose to change closing time to 2 am on Friday and Saturday only but will go through the appropriate permitting processes to do so. Beyond the potential extension of hours of operation, there will be no further expansion of the building or parking areas. Access to the site will be minimal with only one access point on the South property line located as far away from the main intersection as possible. The site is situated between two county roads and a public park, the impact of the redevelopment and operation of business will provide minimal impact. To help reduce future impacts screening will be provided between the site and park to the West. The neighboring areas to the North, East, and south are also guided commercial uses and Zoned C-1. Variance Application Narrative We are applying for multiple variances as part of the redevelopment of the two parcels located at the western end of the intersection of County Road 10 and County Road 50 (Rebecca Park Trl.). The variances being requested are as follows (detail below): Signage, Building Setback, and Parking/Drive Aisle Setback. We are applying for the variances due to the constraints the site provides, and the standards of the business proposed for the site. The signage variance is being requested to allow for 2 additional signs, beyond the one allowed by code. The variance is specifically for the proposed signs on the north and south faces of the building. The proposed signage is the standard for this building prototype, will not project into setbacks or ROWs, and will be illuminated only during hours of operation. The setback variance is requested for a proposed 5 ft building setback. Due to the shape and size of the site, the district standard of a 100 ft setback renders the site practically undevelopable. The same request is being made regarding the parking/drive aisle setback. In addition to the setback, we are also applying for a variance of the drive-through lane placement. The proposed drive-through lane is placed between the building and adjacent public street as required per code. To allow for the drive-through to exist, for appropriate and safe turning movements through the site, the proposed drive-through lane location is the most appropriate placement. All reasonable efforts were made to design the site to conform to the best of applicants ability given the constraints of the site. None of the requested variances will create harmful conditions or outcomes for the surrounding properties or general public, and are consistent with the overall character of the growing area. Furthermore, as noted by city staff in their review of the concept for the site, the proposed redevelopment will eliminate a number of existing non- conformities and encroachments by the current buildings on the subject lots. As stated in the same review, “it is not possible to redevelop the site and comply with all of the district performance standards”. Attachment 7d5. N: \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 \ D W G \ C I V I L \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 C V 0 1 . D W G CO R C O R A N D O M I N O ' S © 2 0 2 4 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLANS CORCORAN DOMINO'S CORCORAN, MN PREPARED FOR: STRACK CONSTRUCTION 715 15TH AVE NE ST. JOSEPH, MN 56374 CONTACT: JAYSON REVOIR PHONE: 320 251 5933 EMAIL: JREVOIR@STRACKCO.COM Vicinity Map (NOT TO SCALE, MAP BACKGROUND SOURCED FROM GOOGLE MY MAPS) SHEETSREVISIONDATENO. 05/17/24 PERMIT SET 09/13/24 CITY/COUNTY COMMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FOR PREPARED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 0051765.01 CONTACT: JEFF WESTENDORF Phone :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax 0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free PRELIMINARY PLANS CORCORAN DOMINO'S CORCORAN, MN FOR INITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 05/03/24 SHEET: C001 PROJECT NUMBER: 0051765.01 SITE Sheet List Table SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C001 COVER C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS C200 SITE PLAN C300 GRADING PLAN C400 UTILITY PLAN C500 DETAILS L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN XB100 TURN MOVEMENT Attachment 7d6. STOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STO STO X X X X X X X X X X POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH PO H PO H PO H PO H PO H SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SITE BENCHMARK ELEV.= 959.46 (88 DATUM) (TOP OF NAIL IN PP) BUILDING BUILDING CULVERT END T.O.C ELEV.= 960.59 INV. ELEV. = 957.73 CULVERT INV. ELEV.= 956.64 FLOOR ELEV. = 960.45 FLOOR ELEV. = 963.00 FLOOR ELEV. = 965.67 FLOOR ELEV. = 961.13 FLOOR ELEV. = 958.61 FLOOR ELEV. = 960.99 T.O.C ELEV.= 957.90 INV. ELEV. = 936.23 A C A C A C DECK DECK G G T E E E E UNDERGROUND GAS SIGN UNDERGROUND GAS SIGN UNDERGROUND GAS SIGN C S S S S S W 5 3 . 5 64. 2 2 5 . 2 12. 1 2 9 . 7 1.4 50. 4 36. 3 4 8 . 8 4.2 5. 8 4.3 1 5 . 4 5 . 9 32. 4 1 2 . 3 30. 5 3 8 . 3 29. 9 2 4 . 1 SE COR. OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T. 119, R. 23 S. LINE OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T. 119, R. 23 S 34°20'25" W 23.20 S 3 5 ° 2 6 ' W ( D ) S 3 5 ° 5 9 ' 2 5 " W 2 0 3 . 6 4 N 35°59'25" E 14.29 S 00°01'05" W 30.80 N 4 3 ° 2 8 ' 2 5 " E 2 0 7 . 9 0 N 4 2 ° 2 0 ' W 7 8 . 1 0 ( D ) S 4 2 ° 2 0 ' E 1 6 7 . 9 ( D ) N 4 2 ° 5 5 ' E ( D ) WEST (D) S 4 1 ° 4 6 ' 3 5 " E 1 6 4 . 3 0 E. LINE OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T. 119, R. 23 SOUTH 28 (D) N 4 1 ° 4 6 ' 3 5 " W 7 8 . 0 2 N 35°26' E (D) N 89°26'35" W 312.85 WEST (D) N 89°26'35" W 312.03 S 33°47' W (D) S 3 5 ° 5 9 ' 2 5 " W 4 4 . 7 1 252.5059.53 S. LINE OF NE'LY 200 FT OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T. 119, R. 23 LYING SW'LY OF CTY RD NO. 10C 1 C 2 EASEMENT DESCRIBED PER NO. 9 OF SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 CURB & G U T T E R CURB & G U T T E R BUILDING HEIGHT = 27.4 FT BUILDING HEIGHT = 21.3 FT BUILDING HEIGHT = 18.82 FT BUILDING HEIGHT = 19.4 FT 4.00 FEET 16. 8 4 27. 8 7 169 . 9 9 33. 6 5 2 3 9 . 3 4 2 . 9 8 N 4 1 ° 4 6 ' 3 5 " W 2 4 2 . 3 2 45. 0 3 146 . 8 7 16. 0 0 AID HIGHWAY NO. 10, PLAT 8 WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T UNDERGROUND WATER IS GRAPHICALLY SHOWN PER WENCK ASSOCIATES PLAN DATED 11/3/17 N 3 5 ° 2 6 ' E ( D ) 7.6 19 . 0 9. 8 5.5 5. 5 6. 7 5.4 4.8 41 . 6 6. 0 5. 0 X X PO H PO H PO H PO H PO H PO H POH POH POH POH 960 960 958 95 5 956 959 958 956 957 9 5 8 9 5 9 95 7 95 7 9 5 7 95 8 9 5 9 9 6 0 961 9 6 2 963 964 965 96 496 3 964 963 9 6 2 96 1 96 0 960 9 5 9 96 0 9 6 1 9 6 1 9 6 2 REMOVE EX. ASPHALT (TYP.) REMOVE EX. GRAVEL REMOVE EX. CONCRETE (TYP.) REMOVE EX. ASPHALT (TYP.) REMOVE EX. FENCE REMOVE EX. CONCRETE (TYP.) REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING REMOVE EX. CONCRETE (TYP.) REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ REMOVE EX. STORM CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVAL & RELOCATION OF OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ REMOVE EX. FENCE X X X X XX X X X X X XXXX X CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE SEALING OF WELL WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ABANDONMENT OF SEPTIC SYSTEM WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY (TYP.) REMOVE EX. BOLLARDS (TYP.) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF EX. UNDERGROUND GAS SIGNAGE WITH UTILITY (TYP.) SAW CUT 161 SF WETLAND FILL REMOVE EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM SHEET NUMBER: DATE: Ph o n e : h L W e Z a W e r ' r L Y e 6 X L W e Fa x 0 L n n e W o n N a 0 1 To l l F r e e LI C E N S E N O . I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A VE R T I C A L S C A L E : HO R I Z O N T A L S C A L E : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : DE S I G N E D : IN I T I A L I S S U E : RE V I S I O N S : PR E P A R E D F O R : N: \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 \ D W G \ C I V I L \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 E X 0 1 . D W G 09/13/24 CO R C O R A N D O M I N O ' S C100 CO R C O R A N , M N CO R C O R A N DO M I N O ' S EX I S T I N G CO N D I T I O N S 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... 05 / 0 3 / 2 4 71 5 1 5 T H A V E N E ST . J O S E P H , M N 5 6 3 7 4 ST R A C K C O N S T R U C T I O N 43 0 1 9 GR E T C H E N S C H R O E D E R FOR PERMIT ONLY © 2 0 2 4 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 0'20'40'60' 1" = 20' 05 / 1 7 / 2 4 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... PE R M I T S E T CI T Y / C O U N T Y C O M M E N T S ... 20 ' 4' o r 2 ' PROJECT NUMBER: 0051765.01 PROPERTY LINE \\\\\\CURB & GUTTER SAW CUT PAVEMENT SAN SANITARY SEWER WAT WATER MAIN STO STORM SEWER CONCRETE BITUMINOUS BUILDING TREE LIGHT POLE TRAFFIC SIGN EXISTING PROPOSED SAN WAT STO CONSTRUCTION BARRICADE WAT HYDRANTWAT GAS GASGAS PUG UNDERGROUND ELECTRICPUG TUG UNDERGROUND TELEPHONETUG POH OVERHEAD ELECTRICPOH TOH OVERHEAD TELEPHONETOH FO TELEPHONE FIBER OPTICFO CTV CABLE TELEVISIONCTV RETAINING WALL FENCEX SOIL BORING LOCATIONSB-19 TREE LINE X EXISTING REMOVALS \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ REMOVAL LEGEND 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIMITS OF REMOVALS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF EXISTING APPURTENANCES TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING OR REPLACING MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (SUCH AS FENCES, SIGNS, IRRIGATION HEADS, ETC.) THAT MAY BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY SITE DEVELOPMENT. ALL PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. REMOVAL NOTES S S X *X X X 4 5 4 T 1 1 19 13 8 B 15 13 13 8 19 14 4 A S.1 S.4 S.2 14 14 10A 9' 21' 19' 34.31' 24' 4' 5' 5' 14' 23'17.21' 11.59' R12' R30' R30' R3' R20' R5' R10' R10' STO STO STO X X X X X X X X X POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH PO H PO H PO H PO H PO H SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N T.O.C ELEV.= 955.21 INV. ELEV. = 936.53 T.O.C ELEV.= 957.90 INV. ELEV. = 936.23 SN G CURB & G U T T E R CURB & G U T T E R 4.00 FEET R.O.W. PER HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 50, PLAT 10 WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T UNDERGROUND WATER IS GRAPHICALLY SHOWN PER WENCK ASSOCIATES PLAN DATED 11/3/17 B A A 9A 9A 6' 6' 10A 25 25 33 B 40 A SHEET NUMBER: DATE: Ph o n e : h L W e Z a W e r ' r L Y e 6 X L W e Fa x 0 L n n e W o n N a 0 1 To l l F r e e LI C E N S E N O . I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A VE R T I C A L S C A L E : HO R I Z O N T A L S C A L E : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : DE S I G N E D : IN I T I A L I S S U E : RE V I S I O N S : PR E P A R E D F O R : N: \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 \ D W G \ C I V I L \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 S P 0 1 . D W G 09/13/24 CO R C O R A N D O M I N O ' S C200 CO R C O R A N , M N CO R C O R A N DO M I N O ' S SI T E P L A N 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... 05 / 0 3 / 2 4 71 5 1 5 T H A V E N E ST . J O S E P H , M N 5 6 3 7 4 ST R A C K C O N S T R U C T I O N 43 0 1 9 GR E T C H E N S C H R O E D E R FOR PERMIT ONLY © 2 0 2 4 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 0'20'40'60' 1" = 20' 05 / 1 7 / 2 4 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... PE R M I T S E T CI T Y / C O U N T Y C O M M E N T S ... 20 ' 4' o r 2 ' PROJECT NUMBER: 0051765.01 S.1 S.10 S.2 REFERENCE STOP SIGN 30" X 30"R1-1 SIZE MnDOT DESIGNATION S.4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING DO NOT ENTER 12" X 18" 30" X 30" R7-8M R5-1 1 B612 CURB AND GUTTER 4 BITUMINOUS CURB 8 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 9A PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 10A PRIVATE PARALLEL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 13 TRAFFIC ARROW 14 SIGN INSTALLATION 15 ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING 19 PAVEMENT SECTIONS 25 CURB CUT WITH EROSION CONTROL MAT 33 CURB CUT WITH CONCRETE SWALE 40 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL 1 ·EXISTING ZONING:C1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ·PROPOSED ZONING:C1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ·PARCEL DESCRIPTION:2311923430003 2311923430004 ·PROPERTY AREA:36,130 SF (.83 AC) ·EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:19,469 SF (53.9%) ·PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:17,074 SF (47.3%) ·BUILDING GROSS SIZE:1,125 SF RESTAURANT KITCHEN: 875 SF RESTAURANT STORAGE:: 250 SF ·BUILDING SETBACK PER CODE:100'=FRONT 20'=SIDE 20'=REAR ·PARKING SETBACK:100'=FRONT AND ROW 10'=SIDE AND REAR ·PARKING SPACE/DRIVE AISLE (60°):10.33' WIDE X 19' LONG, 16' AISLE ·PARKING RATIO REQUIREMENT CITY OF CORCORAN RETAIL/OFFICE:8 +1 SPACE / 200 SF OF BLDG TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED:13 SPACES (875/200= 4.38+8= 12.38= 13) ·PARKING PROVIDED:13 SIGN LEGEND SITE DETAILS (SI-0XX) SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY O'MALLEY & KRON LAND SURVEYORS, INC., MINNESOTA, 01/25/24. 2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. 6. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 9. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 11. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATION OF OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINES GENERAL SITE NOTES PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER LOT LINE RETAINING WALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING EXISTING PROPOSED FENCEXX NORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TRAFFIC SIGN POWER POLE BOLLARD / POST CONCRETE SIDEWALK TIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTER SITE LEGEND 5 T A FLUSH CURB B TRANSITION CURB SITE KEYNOTESA FFE=963.00 T STO X X X X X X X X X SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N INV. ELEV. = 936.23 G UNDERGROUND GAS SIGN UNDERGROUND GAS SIGN WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T 960 960 958 95 5 956 959 958 956 957 9 5 8 9 5 9 95 7 95 7 9 5 7 95 8 9 5 9 9 6 0 961 9 6 2 963 964 965 96 496 3 964 963 9 6 2 96 1 96 0 960 9 5 9 96 0 9 6 1 9 6 1 9 6 2 962.03 962.03962.41 B 962.41 F 962.41 B 962.41 F 962.41 B 962.91 F 962.41 B 962.91 F 962.41 962.03 962.95 962.45 962.45 962.87 963.00 962.22 962.07 B 962.64 F 962.14 B 962.67 F 962.17 B 962.21 F 962.21 B 962.21 F 962.21 B 962.00 F 962.00 B 962.00 F 962.00 B 962.47 F 961.97 B 962.41 F 961.91 962.00 962.37 962.25 961.13 961.11 962.35 962.11961.68 961.66 961.41 961.25 960.00 960.46 962.20 B 963.00 F 962.50 962.31 961.15 961.74 961.40 B 962.30 F 961.80 962.21 961.98 961.49 961.71 962.60 962.77 962.61 962.91 960.34 960.00 960.24 960.08 961 962 96 1 961 962 9 6 1 96 2 9 6 2 96 1 96 1 96 2 96 0 96 1 961.13 961.11 960.24 960.34 960.25960.00 963.00 962.91 962.60 962.12 B 962.55 F 962.05 B 962.08 F 962.08 962.84 962.41 962.51962.51 962.58962.58 B 963.00 F 962.50 B 962.28 F 961.78 961.43 962.41 963.00 963.00 1.50 % 1.31%1.52% 1.96% 0. 9 1 % TW: 955.60 TW: 961.10 TW: 961.19 TW: 961.91 TW: 961.00 TW: 961.80 TW: 962.00 TW: 962.00 TW: 962.00 BW: 955.26 BW: 955.94 BW: 955.78 BW: 958.44 BW: 958.39 BW: 958.62 BW: 959.29 BW: 959.57 BW: 961.50 96 2 9 6 1 955.83 959 957 SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF HP 960.75 959.50 BW: 955.80 TW: 959.00 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: Ph o n e : h L W e Z a W e r ' r L Y e 6 X L W e Fa x 0 L n n e W o n N a 0 1 To l l F r e e LI C E N S E N O . I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A VE R T I C A L S C A L E : HO R I Z O N T A L S C A L E : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : DE S I G N E D : IN I T I A L I S S U E : RE V I S I O N S : PR E P A R E D F O R : N: \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 \ D W G \ C I V I L \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 G D 0 1 . D W G 09/13/24 CO R C O R A N D O M I N O ' S C300 CO R C O R A N , M N CO R C O R A N DO M I N O ' S GR A D I N G & ER O S I O N CO N T R O L PL A N 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... 05 / 0 3 / 2 4 71 5 1 5 T H A V E N E ST . J O S E P H , M N 5 6 3 7 4 ST R A C K C O N S T R U C T I O N 43 0 1 9 GR E T C H E N S C H R O E D E R FOR PERMIT ONLY © 2 0 2 4 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 0'20'40'60' 1" = 20' 05 / 1 7 / 2 4 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... PE R M I T S E T CI T Y / C O U N T Y C O M M E N T S ... 20 ' 4' o r 2 ' PROJECT NUMBER: 0051765.01 PROPERTY LINE 982 980 POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL RIDGE LINE TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SB-19 SOIL BORING LOCATION STO STORM SEWER DRAIN TILE WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER EXISTING PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL CONTOUR982 980 WAT SAN SPOT ELEVATION FLOW DIRECTION SB-19 RETAINING WALL GRADING LIMITSGL CURB AND GUTTER FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) GRADING LEGEND 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 2. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS. 3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 6. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. 8. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. 9. SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. 12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY-LOADED TANDEM-AXLE DUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RE-COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. 14. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 15. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2. 16. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. GRADING NOTES 0.00% 900.00 900.00 TW=XXX.XX BW=XXX.XX E.O.F. SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION SF 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. 3. EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL (ESC): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: CATCH BASIN INSERTS, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. ESC SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. 4. ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. 5. PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST AND USED AS TEMPORARY PONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. 6. WHEN INSTALLING END-OF-LINE FLARED END SECTIONS, BRING THE SILT FENCE UP & OVER THE FLARED END SECTIONS & COVER DISTURBED AREAS WITH RIP RAP. THE UPSTREAM FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL HAVE WOOD FIBER BLANKET INSTALLED ON THE DISTURBED SOILS. 7. ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE RESTORED WITH SEED AND MULCH, SOD, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR BE HARD SURFACE WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA, NPDES, MNDOT, AND CITY. A. TEMPORARY (GREATER THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 22-111 AT 30.5-POUNDS PER ACRE. B. TEMPORARY (LESS THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (FALL) OR 21-111 (SPRING/SUMMER) AT 100-POUNDS PER ACRE C. INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 34-262 AT 14.5-POUNDS PER ACRE. D. POND SLOPES SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 AT 35-POUNDS PER ACRE. E. GENERAL SEEDING SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 25-151 AT 70-POUNDS PER ACRE. F. MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 APPLIED AT 2-TONS PER ACRE. 9. FOR AREAS WITH SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OR EROSION CONTROL BLANKET IS REQUIRED. 10. ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED AROUND THEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 11. ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TO RESTORE THE POND TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION. 12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 13. THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL-DRAINED CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES, PIPING OR OTHER MEANS REQUIRED TO INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. LOW POINTS IN ROADWAYS OR BUILDING PADS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE OUTFLOW. GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES FFE=963.00 T 215 LF - 4" PVC SSWR @ 3.75% CONNECT TO EX. SAN MH 8' OUTSIDE DROP IE(TOP)=945.03 IE(BOT.)=937.03 WET TAP TO EX. WATERMAIN 1-1/2" GV 1-1/2" WATER STUB 4" SSWR STUB IE=953.58 SAN MH 1 RE=962.15 IE(N)=953.30 IE(W)=953.10 7 LF - 4" PVC SSWR @ 4.00% 1 211 LF - 1-1/2" WATER STO STO STO X X X X X X X X X POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH PO H PO H PO H PO H PO H PO H SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N CULVERT END T.O.C ELEV.= 955.21 INV. ELEV. = 936.53 T.O.C ELEV.= 957.90 INV. ELEV. = 936.23 SN G UNDERGROUND GAS SIGN EASEMENT DESCRIBED PER NO. 9 OF SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 10, PLAT 8 R.O.W. PER HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 50, WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WAT UNDERGROUND WATER IS GRAPHICALLY SHOWN PER WENCK ASSOCIATES PLAN DATED 11/3/17 2 INSULATE. SEE NOTE 12. INSULATE. SEE NOTE 12. 12" FES IE=955.8 121 LF - 12" RCP STORM @ 0.4%CBMH-2 RE = 959.5 IE = 956.5 CBMH-1 RE = 960.0 IE = 956.153 LF - 12" RCP STORM @ 0.4% SHEET NUMBER: DATE: Ph o n e : h L W e Z a W e r ' r L Y e 6 X L W e Fa x 0 L n n e W o n N a 0 1 To l l F r e e LI C E N S E N O . I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A VE R T I C A L S C A L E : HO R I Z O N T A L S C A L E : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : DE S I G N E D : IN I T I A L I S S U E : RE V I S I O N S : PR E P A R E D F O R : N: \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 \ D W G \ C I V I L \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 U T 0 1 . D W G 09/13/24 CO R C O R A N D O M I N O ' S C400 CO R C O R A N , M N CO R C O R A N DO M I N O ' S UT I L I T Y P L A N 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... 05 / 0 3 / 2 4 71 5 1 5 T H A V E N E ST . J O S E P H , M N 5 6 3 7 4 ST R A C K C O N S T R U C T I O N 43 0 1 9 GR E T C H E N S C H R O E D E R FOR PERMIT ONLY © 2 0 2 4 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 0'20'40'60' 1" = 20' 05 / 1 7 / 2 4 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... PE R M I T S E T CI T Y / C O U N T Y C O M M E N T S ... 20 ' 4' o r 2 ' PROJECT NUMBER: 0051765.01 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. 5. ALL PRIVATE LARGE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AND MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. ALL SMALL / DRY UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. 8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. 9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER AND WATER LINES SHALL CROSS ABOVE ANY SEWER. IF THIS IS NOT ACHIEVABLE, SANITARY AND STORM SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF A MATERIAL APPROVED FOR USE WITHIN A BUILDING AND AS LISTED IN TABLE 701.2 OF THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10-FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER. 10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 11. DUCTILE IRON WATER LINES SHALL BE CLASS 52, PER AWWA C115 OR C151. COPPER WATER LINES SHALL BE TYPE K PER ASTM B88. PVC WATER LINES SHALL BE PER AWWA C900 AND INSTALLED PER AWWA C605 IF ALLOWED BY CITY. 12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 7.5' MINIMUM COVER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 7.5' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS. 13. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AND NOT WITHIN 10' OF WATER LINE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. SANITARY AND STORM SEWER PIPE WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS, AND WITHIN10 FEET OF WATER LINE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D2665. ALL PLASTIC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OF A PRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TO MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.0. 14. STORM SEWER PIPE: A. RCP AND HDPE PIPE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY OR MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR . B. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PER ASTM C76, WITH GASKETS PER ASTM C443. C. HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 10-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M252. HDPE STORM PIPE 12- TO 60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306. FITTINGS SHALL BE PER ASTM D3212 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321. D. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM D2665 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321. E. ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS AND STRUCTURE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 707.3. STORM SEWER LOCATED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712. 15. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE 604.10.1. 16. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS-BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS-BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST-CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN EASEMENT LINE PROPERTY LINE HYDRANT GATE VALVE DRAIN TILE FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) LIGHT POLE GAS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC OVERHEAD TELEPHONE TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC CABLE TELEVISION SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN CURB AND GUTTER SAN STO WAT WAT GAS GAS PUG PUG TUG TOH POH POH TOH TOH FO FO CTV CTV FM FM S DT SAN TOP STO IENUMBER UTILITY CROSSINGS -1 WM TOP * -952.83 # WM IE 954.39 SAN IE - -2 -945.83 947.59- SHEET NUMBER: DATE: Ph o n e : h L W e Z a W e r ' r L Y e 6 X L W e Fa x 0 L n n e W o n N a 0 1 To l l F r e e LI C E N S E N O . I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A VE R T I C A L S C A L E : HO R I Z O N T A L S C A L E : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : DE S I G N E D : IN I T I A L I S S U E : RE V I S I O N S : PR E P A R E D F O R : N: \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 \ D W G \ C I V I L \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 D T 0 1 . D W G 09/13/24 CO R C O R A N D O M I N O ' S C500 CO R C O R A N , M N CO R C O R A N DO M I N O ' S DE T A I L S 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... 05 / 0 3 / 2 4 71 5 1 5 T H A V E N E ST . J O S E P H , M N 5 6 3 7 4 ST R A C K C O N S T R U C T I O N 43 0 1 9 GR E T C H E N S C H R O E D E R FOR PERMIT ONLY © 2 0 2 4 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 05 / 1 7 / 2 4 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... PE R M I T S E T CI T Y / C O U N T Y C O M M E N T S ... ## # ## o r # # PROJECT NUMBER: 0051765.01 LAST REVISED: 01/09/20B6 STYLE CURB AND GUTTER SI01 NOTES: 1. EXPANSION JOINT SPACING IS 100' 2. MIN. 3" CL. 5 UNDER C.&G. 3. CURB SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2531 7" 8"X" Y" 6" 13 1 / 2 " Curb Type X Y B612 B618 B624 24" 18" 12" 20" 26" 32" SLOPE 3/4" PER FT. 1 3 R - 3 " R = 3 " R=1 / 2 " TIP OUT SLOPE 3/4" PER FT. 2" PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SI08 NOTES: 1. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR WALK SCORING AND JOINT LAYOUT. 2. WALK SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2521 MIX NO. 3A32 WITH A 28-DAY DESIGN STRENGTH OF 3900-PSI. LAST REVISED: 08/15/17 FINISH GRADE SEE PLAN 4" CONCRETE WALK WITH CONTRACTION JOINTS EVERY 5' AND EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 100' OR AT 90° INTERSECTIONS 2% CROSS SLOPE 6" MIN. 4" MNDOT SPEC 3138 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 6" MA X . A A NOTES: 1. PROVIDE A RELATIVELY FLAT MINIMUM 4'x4' LANDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, 2% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE BOTH DIRECTIONS. 2. CURB RAMP AREA TO BE CONCRETE AND MEET LATEST ADA REQUIREMENTS. RAMP CROSS SLOPE 2% MAXIMUM. BACK-TO-BACK PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 48'' LANDING BETWEEN, OR PROVIDE AT-GRADE CROSSING. 3. SIDE FLARES TO BE CONCRETE AND IMPLEMENTED WHERE ADJACENT TO PAVED AREAS. FLARED SLOPE TO BE 10% MAXIMUM. EXISTING CURB RAMP ALTERATIONS, WITH NO LANDING, SHALL BE 8.33% MAXIMUM. PROVIDE 10% MAXIMUM SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE MAY NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH. 5. ADA REQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE(TRUNCATED DOMES) SHALL BE 2' MIN. IN DIRECTION OF LANDING AT CURB AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE LANDING. AREA SHALL BE CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE WITH A PREFABRICATED CAST IRON TRUNCATED DOME INSERT MEETING THE ADA DOME SIZE AND SPACING REQUIREMENTS. A LAST REVISED: 08/15/17PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP SI09A A 3 3 22 33 FACE OF CURB BACK OF CURB FACE OF CURB 1 5 1 58" 5' MI N . 4' MIN. OR PER PLAN 5' MIN. 6' - 0 " MI N . 2' 8" 5' MIN.5' MIN.4' MIN. OR PER PLAN 6' - 0 " MI N . 2' CURB FACE OR GUTTER 5% APPROACH SLOPE MAX SEE NOTE #4 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL RAMP 6'-0" MIN.LANDING 4' MIN. RAMP 8.33% MAX. SLOPE CONCRETE WALK DET. WARN. SURFACE ROUND ALL SLOPED INTERSECTIONSSIDE FLARE 10% MAX. SLOPE SIDE FLARE 5' MIN. RAMP 4' MIN. SIDE FLARE 5' MIN. ELEVATION OF RAMP SECTION A-A PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP PLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMP NOTE: 1. ALL TRAFFIC FLOW ARROWS TO BE SOLID WHITE REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT AS PER DIMENSIONS ABOVE TRAFFIC ARROW LAST REVISED: 08/15/17 SI13 2.00 1. 7 5 3. 7 5 1.00 2. 0 0 R 4.75 6 " W I D T H , D E P T H A S N E E D E D PARALLEL RAMP SECTION A-A PUBLIC PARALLEL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP A A ISOMETRIC PLAN INTEGRAL CURB WITH ROUNDED EDGES TO HOLD ADJACENT GRADE, AS REQUIRED LANDING 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, BOTH DIRECTIONS FRONT FACE OF CURB CURB FACE OR GUTTER 5% APPROACH SLOPE MAX. 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL (TYP.) INTEGRAL CURB TO HOLD ADJACENT GROUND, AS REQUIRED LANDING CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE SURFACE ROUND ALL SLOPED INTERSECTIONS INTEGRAL CURB TO HOLD ADJACENT GROUND, AS REQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SIDEWALK WIDTH RAMP 6' TYP. 7' MAX. LANDING 4' MIN. RAMP 6' TYP. 7' MAX. 4' MIN . O R PER PL A N 2' NOTES: 1. CURB RAMP AREA TO BE CONCRETE AND MEET LATEST ADA REQUIREMENTS. RAMP CROSS SLOPE 2% MAXIMUM. 2. RAMP SURFACE TO BE MEDIUM BROOM FINISH, PERPENDICULAR TO TRAVEL PATH. 3. ADA RQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE (TRUNCATED DOMES) SHALL BE 2' MIN. IN DIRECTION OF LANDING AT CURB AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE LANDING. AREA SHALL BE CAST IRON INSERT MEETING ADA DOME SIZE AND SPACING REQUIREMENTS AND WITH CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE. 4. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE MAY NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH. RAMP 8 . 3 3 % S L O P E MAX. O R P E R P L A N RAMP 8 . 3 3 % S L O P E MAX. O R P E R P L A N ELEVATION 4 PROVIDE A FLAT 4'x4' LANDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE LAST REVISED: 08/15/17 SI10A 7' MAX . 7' MAX . PROVIDE A FLAT 4'x4' LANDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE 3'-0" 7'-0" 3'-0" SIGN INSTALLED IN LANDSCAPE AREA HANDICAP STALL PARKING SIGN INSTALLED IN PARKING LOT NOTE: 1. SIGN TO BE 2-SIDED WHERE HANDICAP PARKING STALLS FACE ONE ANOTHER. 2. PARKING GRADE IS DEFINED AS EITHER FLOW LINE OF CURB OR PAVEMENT SURFACE AT THE HEAD OF THE STALL. 12" LAST REVISED: 06/15/19SIGN POST INSTALLATION SI14 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CAP REQUIRED 2" GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE, ROUND, SET IN CONCRETE MOWING EDGE PAVEMENT 6" STEEL CASING CONCRETE FOOTING 2'-0" MIN. 10" BOTTOM OF THE LOWEST SIGN TO BE MOUNTED 60"-66" FROM PARKING GRADE 2'-0" MIN. 3'-6" MIN. FROST DEPTH IF GREATER LAST REVISED: 11/15/23ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SI15 HANDICAP SYMBOL HANDICAP SIGN NOTE: BOTTOM OF SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED 60"-66" FROM PARKING GRADE, SEE SIGN POST INSTALLATION DETAIL HANDICAP PARKING NOTE: STRIPING TO MATCH PARKING, UNLESS PER LOCAL CODE NOTE: SEE PLAN FOR PARKING LAYOUT PARKING VEHICLE ID REQUIRED UP TO $200 FINE FOR VIOLATION VAN ACCESSIBLE NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE HANDICAP PARKING SPACE WITH PAINTED INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY WITH CONTRASTING SQUARE BACKGROUND, CENTERED TOWARD DRIVE AISLE. HANDICAP PARKING SIGNS, 12"X18", OR PER LOCAL CODE HANDICAP SIGN CENTERED AT HEAD OF SPACE ON CENTER STRIPEPE R C I T Y CO D E HANDICAP VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, 12"X16", OR PER LOCAL CODE, AS APPLICABLE FACE OF CURB SIDEWALK HANDICAP SIGN CENTERED AT HEAD OF SPACE, 2' MIN. AND 8' MAX. FROM FACE OF CURB 2" - 0 " 2" - 0 " 10" DIAMETER CENTER SYMBOL IN PARKING STALL, ALL LINES TO BE 5" WIDE 2" - 0 " NO PARKING 4" WIDE PAINTED STRIPING AT 45 DEGREES AND AT 2' O.C. AT ACCESS AISLE 8' MIN. 8' MIN. 8' MIN. 5° 67.5° HANDICAP PARKING ACCESS AISLE WITH PAINTED 12" HIGH LETTERING OF "NO PARKING" CENTERED TOWARD DRIVE AISLE NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE SIGN CENTERED AT HEAD OF SPACE ON CENTER STRIPE SI19 PAVEMENT SECTIONS SHOWN ARE FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTIONS. LAST REVISED: 08/15/17PAVEMENT SECTIONS X" MnDOT TYPE SPWEA340E WEARING COURSE X" MnDOT TYPE SPNWB330E BASE COURSE X" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5 X" CONCRETE PAVEMENT W/ #4 REBAR AT 16" O.C. EACH WAY X" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5 CONCRETE PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (HEAVY DUTY) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (STANDARD DUTY) COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR) COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR) MNDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT X" MnDOT TYPE SPWEA340E WEARING COURSE X" MnDOT TYPE SPNWB330E BASE COURSE X" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5 COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR) MNDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT NOTE: MATCH ENDS INTO CURB AND GUTTER OR TAPER AS NECESSARY. CURB CUT WITH EROSION CONTROL MAT SI25 FLOW EROSION CONTROL MAT 1:1 TAPER FLOW FLOW 12" (TYP.) 1:1 TAPER 13 . 5 " 4' TYPICAL SECTION A-A PERSPECTIVE F L O W A A LAST REVISED: 08/15/17 FLOW 4' TYPICA L CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER WIDTH V A R I E S LAST REVISED: 08/15/17 SI40 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL 8" NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING AND SHOP DRAWINGS IF WALL IS GREATER THAN 4 FEET TALL. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT WALL BLOCK TYPE, SIZE, AND COLOR FOR APPROVAL. 1" - 1 1/4" SWALE AT TOP OF WALL MAY BE REQUIRED, VERIFY 8" MIN. LOW PERMEABLE SOIL FILTER FABRIC UNIT DRAINAGE FILL (3/4" CRUSHED ROCK OR STONE) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF EXCAVATION 4" PERFORATED PVC DRAINTILE WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC, DAYLIGHT OR TO STORM SYSTEM, AS REQUIRED UNREINFORCED CONCRETE OR CRUSHED STONE LEVELING PAD FINISHED GRADE CONCRETE MODULAR BLOCK ANCHORING PINS (AS REQUIRED) CAP UNIT, ADHERED TO TOP COURSE WITH ADHESIVE FOUNDATION SOIL RETAINED SOIL DE S I G N H E I G H T 6" 13.5" LAST REVISED: 08/15/17CURB CUT WITH CONCRETE SWALE SI33 FORM ENDS AS B618 CURB & GUTTER 4' SECTION A-A PERSPECTIVE NOTE: MATCH ENDS INTO CURB & GUTTER OR BEAVERTAIL AS NECESSARY FLOW FLOW CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 1:1 TAPER CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 6" DEPTH CONCRETE SWALE PER PLAN 4' TYP I C A L A A F L O W LAST REVISED: 08/15/17BITUMINOUS CURB SI04 BITUMINOUS CURB R=2" 5 1/2"1/2" TO 3/4" R=1" 7" 8 1/2"6"6" NOTE: VOLUME OF CURB 0.338 CU.FT. PER LINEAR FT. 1:1 S L O P E 12 " MI N . LAST REVISED: 08/15/17SILT FENCE GD02 RUNOFF PONDING HEIGHT FLOW FLOW PONDING HEIGHT RUNOFF NOTES: 1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN NECESSARY. 2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT OFF-SITE AND CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY. TRENCH WITH NATIVE BACKFILL ALTERNATIVE DETAIL EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC TYPE II - ADD WIRE MESH BACKING TYPE III - ADD WIRE MESH AND HAY BALES STEEL OR WOOD POST 36" HIGH MAX. STEEL OR WOOD POST FILTER FABRIC, ATTACH SECURELY TO UPSTREAM SIDE OF POST 4"x6" TRENCH WITH COMPACTED BACKFILL GRAVEL 8"12 " MI N . 9" M A X . RE C O M M E N D E D ST O R A G E H E I G H T 10'-0 " M A X . S P A C I N G W I T H WIRE S U P P O R T F E N C E . 6'-0" M A X . S P A C I N G WITHO U T W I R E S U P P O R T FENC E STANDARD DETAIL TRENCH WITH GRAVEL LAST REVISED: 08/15/17CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE GD05 NOTES: 1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK/WOOD CHIPS TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK/WOOD CHIPS. 2. WOODCHIPS USED FOR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES MUST BE 80% NOT LESS THAN 2-INCHES AND NOT MORE THAN 5-INCHES. NO CHIPPED-UP MANUFACTURED WOOD AND/OR CHEMICALLY TREATED IS ALLOWED. 3. ENTRANCES MUST BE MAINTAINED REGULARLY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS. FUGITIVE ROCK OR WOODCHIPS WILL BE REMOVED FROM ADJACENT ROADWAYS DAILY OR MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY. 4. LENGTH AND WIDTH TO BE ADJUSTED FOR SITE CONDITIONS. HAR D S U R F A C E PUB L I C R O A D 1"-2" WASHED ROCK OR WOODCHIPS PER SPECIFICATIONS 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE ROCK=12" MIN. WOODCHIPS=18" MIN. 20' M I N . WIDT H 50' M I N . LAST REVISED: 08/15/17INLET PROTECTION WITH ROCK LOG GD11 NOTE: 1. ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. (MEETING SPEC. 3733 (TYPE 1) GEOTEXTILES, PROPOSED 2005 EDITION) ENDS SECURELY CLOSED TO PREVENT LOSS OF OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE FILL. SECURED WITH 50 PSI ZIP TIE OVERLAP ENDS 6" 4' LONG AND 5" DIAMETER GEOTEXTILE SOCK. SEAM JOINED BY TWO ROWS OF STITCHING WITH A PLASTIC MESH BACKING OR HEATBONDED. (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) FILL ROCK LOG WITH OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE CONSISTING OF SOUND, DURABLE PARTICLES OF CRUSHED QUARRY ROCK OR GRAVEL CONFORMING TO 3137, CA-3 (<1.5") GRADATION (OR EQUIVALENT). STO STO X X X X X X X X X POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH PO H PO H PO H PO H SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N G WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T 4 5 4 FFE=963.00 T STO STO X X X X X X X X X POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH PO H PO H PO H PO H SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N G WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T 21 - VAR 5 - SKH 2 - ASM 1 - BHS 3 - DPB 2 - BHS 8 - KFG 17 - KFG 3 - ICD 13 - ICD 3 - KFG 5 - BCV5 - KFG 5 - AFD 5 - KFG 5 - BCV 8 - PDS 4 - DBH 3 - DPB 2 - BHS 17 - KFG 7 - PDS 5 - PDS 2 - ASM 2 - ASM 5 - HCS 11 - HCS 5 - KFG B A A C A B A CC C C D D B B C C A B A B A B A C CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING O.C. MATURE SIZE CONIFEROUS TREES BHS 5 BLACK HILLS WHITE SPRUCE / PICEA GLAUCA 'DENSATA'6` HT B&B AS SHOWN H 30`-40` W 20`-30` DECIDUOUS TREES ASM 6 APOLLO® SUGAR MAPLE / ACER SACCHARUM 'BARRETT COLE'2.5" CAL AS SHOWN H 30-40` W 10-12` DPB 6 DAKOTA PINNACLE® BIRCH / BETULA PLATYPHYLLA 'FARGO'2.5" CAL AS SHOWN H 40-50` W 15-20` SKH 5 SKYLINE® HONEY LOCUST / GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SKYCOLE'2.5" CAL AS SHOWN H 40`-50` W 30`-35` CONIFEROUS SHRUBS HCS 16 HERMANN NAUE COLORADO SPRUCE / PICEA PUNGENS 'HERMANN NAUE'#5 CONT. 4`-0" O.C. H 3-5` W 3-5` DECIDUOUS SHRUB AFD 5 ARCTIC FIRE® RED TWIG DOGWOOD / CORNUS SERICEA 'FARROW'#5 CONT. 4`-0" O.C. H 3-5` W 3-5` DBH 4 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE / DIERVILLA LONICERA #1 CONT. 3`-0" O.C. H 2-3` W 2-3` BCV 10 BAILEY'S COMPACT VIBURNUM / VIBURNUM TRILOBUM 'BAILEY COMPACT'#5 CONT. 4`-0" O.C. H 3-5` W 3-5` PERENNIALS VAR 21 VISION IN RED ASTILBE / ASTILBE CHINENSIS 'VISION IN RED'#1 CONT.24" O.C.H 18-20" W 18-24" ICD 21 ICE CARNIVAL DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS X 'ICE CARNIVAL'#1 CONT.24" O.C.H 24-28" W 18-24" GRASSES KFG 60 KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS / CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' #5 CONT. 30" O.C.H 4-5` W 2-3` PDS 20 PRAIRIE DROPSEED / SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS #1 CONT 24" O.C.H 2-3` W 2-3` SHEET NUMBER: DATE: Ph o n e : h L W e Z a W e r ' r L Y e 6 X L W e Fa x 0 L n n e W o n N a 0 1 To l l F r e e LI C E N S E N O . I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A VE R T I C A L S C A L E : HO R I Z O N T A L S C A L E : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : DE S I G N E D : IN I T I A L I S S U E : RE V I S I O N S : PR E P A R E D F O R : N: \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 \ D W G \ C I V I L \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 P L 0 1 . D W G 09/13/24 CO R C O R A N D O M I N O ' S L100 CO R C O R A N , M N CO R C O R A N DO M I N O ' S LA N D S C A P E PL A N 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... 05 / 0 3 / 2 4 71 5 1 5 T H A V E N E ST . J O S E P H , M N 5 6 3 7 4 ST R A C K C O N S T R U C T I O N 44 0 1 8 JE F F W E S T E N D O R F FOR PERMIT ONLY © 2 0 2 4 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 0'20'40'60' 1" = 20' 05 / 1 7 / 2 4 09 / 1 3 / 2 4 ... PE R M I T S E T CI T Y / C O U N T Y C O M M E N T S ... 20 ' 4' o r 2 ' PROJECT NUMBER: 0051765.01 ABBREVIATIONS: B&B = BALLED AND BURLAPPED CAL. = CALIPER HT. = HEIGHT MIN. =MINIMUM O.C. = ON CENTER QTY .= QUANTITY CONT. = CONTAINER NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. PLANT SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE LEGEND SHRUBS DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE PERENNIALS EDGER A SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) B EDGER (TYP.) C SOD (TYP.) D ROCK MULCH (TYP.) ALANDSCAPE KEYNOTES CANOPY/ EVERGREEN TREE REQUIREMENT (THE GREATER OF) 1 CANOPY/ EVERGREEN TREE PER 1000 SF OF GROSS BUILDING FLOOR AREA (1,122/1000= 1.12= 2 TREES) OR 1 CANOPY/ EVERGREEN TREE PER 50 LF OF SITE PERIMETER (883/50= 17.66= 18 TREES) *50% OF THE CANOPY/ EVERGREEN TREES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH 3 ORNAMENTAL TREES TO ONE CANOPY/ EVERGREEN TREE NOT MORE THAN 30% OF THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES SHALL BE COMPOSED OF A SINGLE SPECIES. TREES REQUIRED= 18 TREES PROVIDED= 22 ( 5 PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREES + 17 PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREES) SHRUB REQUIREMENT (THE GREATER OF) 1 SHRUBS PER 300 SF OF GROSS BUILDING FLOOR AREA (1,122/300= 3.74= 4 SHRUBS) OR 1 SHRUBS PER 30 LF OF SITE PERIMETER (883/30= 29.43= 30 SHRUBS) SHRUBS REQUIRED= 30 SHRUBS SHRUBS PROVIDED= 35 ( 16 PROPOSED CONIFEROUS SHRUBS + 19 PROPOSED DECIDUOUS SHRUBS) +++CITY REQUIREMENTS MET+++ LANDSCAPE SUMMARY LAST REVISED: 10/23/18SHRUB & PERENNIAL CONTAINER PLANTING LA27-C N.T.S. 2X CONT. DIAMETER SET CONTAINER ROOT SOIL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR MILD COMPACTED SOIL FOR DEPTH TO MATCH FINISH GRADE SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. DEPTH PER CONTAINER SOIL DEPTH BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED PLANTING SOIL OR AS APPROVED EDGING AT PLANTING BEDS, AS SPECIFIED, ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS MULCH AS SPECIFIED (AND FILTER FABRIC, AS INDICATED) REMOVE CONTAINER, SCARIFY SIDES, AND SET SOIL MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL BASE MOUND, MATCHING SHRUBS NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE LAST REVISED: 10/19/18DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING LA28 N.T.S. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED. PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. 2X BALL DIAMETER SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. 2XBALL DIAMETER LAST REVISED: 10/19/18EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING LA29 N.T.S. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 6" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. PLANTING NOTES SYMBOLS 1 A101 SIM 101 DOOR TAG 1 A101 SIM BUILDING SECTION WALL SECTION1 A101 SIM DETAIL SECTION1 A101 1 A101 SIM ENLARGED PLAN NEW DOOR EXISTING DOOR 1 REVISION REVISION DELTA 0 GRID LINE 1 A101 SIM EXTERIOR ELEVATION INTERIOR ELEVATION1 A101 Name Elevation LEVEL 1t WINDOW / STOREFRONT / CURTAINWALL TYPE WALL TYPE1i 1 1i # #KEY NOTE Room name 101 150 SF ROOM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT DESCRIPTION DOMINO'S SHELL PROJECT DESCRIPTION:NEW SLAB ON GRADE RETAIL TENANT DOMINOS SHELL BUILDING. EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED AND LOT(S) REDEVOPED. PROJECT DELIVERY TO BE DESIGN-BUILD MEP BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. INTERIOR BUILDOUT TO BE SEPERATELY PERMITTED. ADDRESS:20115 COUNTY RD 10 CORCORAN, MN 55340 PID:2311923430003, 2311923430004 PROPOSED USE:"B" (CLASSIFICATION) BUILDING HEIGHT:1 STORY (20'-0" MAX) FIRE PROTECTION:NOT SPRINKLED *REFER TO SHEET A001 FOR MORE EXTENSIVE CODE REVIEW PROJECT AREA:1,134 GSF CLIENT PROJECT TEAM TEAM HONEY BADGER 1617 US-12 WILLMAR, MN 56201 CONTACT: BLAKE GRAVES EMAIL: BLAKEGRAVES@TEAMHONEYBADGER.COM PHONE: 320-444-5410 GENERAL CONTRACTOR STRACK CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 715 15TH AVE NE ST. JOSEPH, MN 56374 CONTACT: MATT STRACK EMAIL: MSTRACK@STRACKCO.COM PHONE: 320-251-5933 ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL/PLUMBING THIS PROJECT IS BEING DELIVERED AS DESIGN BUILD MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR UNDER A SEPARATE SUBMTITTAL(S) SANDMAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1587 30TH AVE SOUTH MOORHEAD, MN 56560 CONTACT: JUSTIN SHOENBERG EMAIL: JUSTIN.SCHOENBERG@SANDMANSE.COM PHONE: 218-284-3047 THIELEN & GREEN 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 55014 CONTACT: KRIS THIELEN - ARCHITECT (MN #59237) EMAIL: KMT@TANDGARCH.COM PHONE: 763-553-7927 WESTWOOD 12701 WHITEWATEER DRIVE. SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 CONTACT: JEFF WESTENDORF EMAIL: JEFF.WESTENDORF@WESTWOODPS.COM PHONE: 952-697-5722 GENERAL FIRE DEPT NOTES 1. ALL LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED PER APPLICABLE FIRE PREVENTION CODE - SEE LIFE SAFETY PLAN 2. FIE EXTINGUISHER REQUIREMENTS SHELL BE AS DETERMINED BY FIELD INSPECTION AND NFPA 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AND CABINETS AS REQUIRED - SEE LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR SUGGESTED LOCATION(S) 3. BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING AND SHALL BE VISIBLE / LEGIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THEIR BACKGROUND. ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR 4. COMMERCIAL DUMPSTERS OR CONTAINERS WITH A CAPACITY OF ONE-AND- ONE-HALF CUBIC YARDS OR GREATER SHALL NOT BE STORED OR PLACED WITHIN FIVE FEET OF COMBUSTIBLE WALLS, OPENINGS, OR ROOF EAVE LINES UNLESS THESE AREAS ARE PROTECTED BY AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM 5. POST "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" SIGNS ALONG VEHICULAR ACCESS ROADS NOTES TO BIDDERS AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 1341.0030 IEBC SECTION 305, ACCESSIBILITY FOR EXISITING BUILDINGS, SECTION 305.7 ALTERATIONS AFFECTING AN AREA CONTAINING A PRIMARY FUNCTION, PROVIDE SEPARATE LINE ITEMS FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK PERTAINING TO THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE: 1. PARKING FACILITIES 2. ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES 3. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA 4. TOILET FACILITIES 5. DRINKING FOUNTAINS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE TO BE LISTED IN THE BID AS SEPARATE LINE ITEM, ADD OR DEDUCT ALTERNATES. REFER TO THE FOLLOWING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL AND/OR COMPLETE INFORMATION 1. N/A DEFERRED SUBMITTALS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE SUBMITTED AS DEFERRED SUBMITTALS BY THE APPROPRIATE INSTALLING SUBCONTRACTOR OR VENDOR. FOR EACH DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEM, THE SUBCONTRACTOR OR VENDOR SHALL FIRST SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERED DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO THE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR FIRE MARSHAL. ARCHITECT’S REVIEW WILL BE FOR GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE BUILDING DESIGN ONLY. SUBCONTRACTOR OR VENDOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND PAYMENT OF ALL FEES FOR SUBMITTALS. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE TIMING OF SUBMITTALS SO AS TO NOT INTERFERE WITH OVERALL CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE, ALLOWING TIME FOR APPROPRIATE REVIEWS FOR ARCHITECT AND BUILDING OFFICIAL OR FIRE MARSHAL. NO DELAYS OR TIME EXTENSIONS WILL BE ALLOWED FOR FAILURE TO ALLOW APPROPRIATE TIME FOR REVIEW. 1. MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING 2. IT, LOW-VOLTAGE, AV, DATA, SECURITY 3. SIGNAGE (INTERIOR AND/OR EXTERIOR) GENERAL NOTES 1. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THEIR SUB- CONTRACTORS, MATERIAL SUPPLIERS, AND/OR THEIR CONSULTANTS TO REVIEW THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS IN ITS ENTIRETY. 2. ITEMS SHOWN IN ONE LOCATION IN THE DRAWINGS AND/OR INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE WORK AND SHALL APPLY AT SIMILAR LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS PROVIDED THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. 3. NO DEVIATIONS FROM THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING SPECIFICATIONS, SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER AND/OR ARCHITECT. 4. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUB-CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 6. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM WITH THE OWNER AND/OR LANDLORD ANY PROJECT REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO BIDDING WORK INCLUDING: PRE-APPROVED SUBCONTRACTORS, MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS, ETC. 7. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ARCHITECT IN WRITING ANY DISCREPANCIES, ERRORS AND/OR OMISSIONS PRIOR TO STARTING THAT PORTION OF WORK IN A TIMELY MATTER TO ALLOW REVIEW BY AOR AND OWNER FOR RESPONSE. NO WORK IS TO OCCUR IN AREA OF CONFLICT UNTIL WRITTEN RESPONSE AND APPROVAL IS ACHIEVED BY ALL PARTIES (OWNER, ARCHITECT, GENERAL CONTRACTOR). 8. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY ARCHITECT AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ENCOUNTERED IN THE FIELD. 9. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY APPROPRIATE SKILLED PERSONALE AND MATERIALS USED SHALL BE OF FIRST QUALITY. 10. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, FINISHES, LANDSCAPING, MEP SYSTEMS UNLESS REQUIRED TO REMOVE OR REPLACE AS SPECIFIED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 11. WATER RESISTANT GYP. BD. SHALL BE USED AT ALL WET LOCATIONS 12. ALL EXISTING WALLS AND/OR FENESTRATION ARE TO REMAIN U.N.O. 13. IF REQUIRED, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN DRAWINGS, SUBMIT AND RECEIVE APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED WITH THE LOCAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION ON THIS PROJECT. THE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM MUST BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CODES LISTED BELOW AND LOCAL AMENDMENTS. A SEPARATE PERMIT BY DESIGN BUILD ENGINEERING COORDINATED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION FOR APPROVAL. 14. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE BLOCKING AS DIRECTED BY THE MANUFACTURER FOR ALL WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT OR DEVICES, AND SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR ALL ITEMS NOTED AS "BY OWNER" OR "BY OTHERS". 15. DRAWINGS WERE PREPARED USING PRODUCT SPECIFIC CONFIGURATION INFORMATION, ACTUAL DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS OF SELECTED MATERIALS MAY CHANGE BEFORE INCORPORATION INTO THE WORK. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ACCOMMODATING ANY CHANGES TO OTHER MATERIALS THAT ARE NECESSARY BECAUSE OF THESE DIFFERENCES. 16. TYPICAL AND PROJECT SPECIFIC DETAILS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DRAWINGS, WHERE DETAILS OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED SEEK CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK 17. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO LAWS, REGULATIONS, CODES AND ORDINANCES OF FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, CITY OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION AS EACH MAY APPLY. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN ANY OF THE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST STRINGENT REQUIREMENT SHALL GOVERN 18. EXITS, EXIT SIGNS, FIRE ALARM PANELS, HOSE CABINETS, FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS AND STANDPIPE CONNECTIONS, AS APPLICABLE, SHALL NOT BE CONCEALED BY CURTAINS, MIRRORS, OR OTHER DECORATIVE MATERIAL 19. ALL EXIT DOORS SHALL BE READILY OPENABLE FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT 20. REFER TO INDIVIDUAL SHEETS FOR OTHER GENERAL NOTES SPECIFIC TO THAT SECTION TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH PROJECT LOCATION LOCATION MAP TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH PROJECT LOCATION KEY PLAN ACT ACOUSTIC CEILING TILE ADJ ADJACENT BD BOARD BO BOTTOM OF BM BEAM CL CENTER LENE CLG CEILING CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COL COLUMN CONC CONCRETE DIM DIMENSION EQ EQ EXIST EXISTING FLR FLOOR FO FACE OF FP FILLER PANEL GYP BD GYPSUM BOARD HT HEIGHT INSUL INSULATION MAX MAXIMUM MIN MINIMUM NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NTS NOT TO SCALE OC ON CENTER PLY WD PLYWOOD PT PRESSURE TREATED PTD PAINTED RO ROUGH OPENING TBD TO BE DETERMINED TYP TYPICAL UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VIF VERIFY IN FIELD W/WITH WD WOOD ABBREVIATIONS OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THIELEN & GREEN REQUIRES APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING PERMIT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR CITY PLAN REVIEW. PLEASE REVIEW THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS IN FULL AND MAKE NOTE OF ANY ADDITIONAL CHANGES THAT SHOULD BE ADDRESSED. AN AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE BELOW INDICATES THE APPROVAL OF THIS DESIGN AND AUTHORIZES THIELEN & GREEN TO PROCEED WITH THE PERMITTING PROCESS AS OUTLINE IN THE CONTRACT AGREEMENT. X CLIENT NAME DATE Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number ISSUE DATE 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 763-553-7927 WWW.TANDGARCH.COM CITY STAMP AREA PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION STRACK CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 715 15TH AVE NE, ST. JOSEPH, MN 56374 320-251-5933 WWW.STRACKCO.COM 7/ 2 / 2 0 2 4 8 : 4 4 : 5 8 P M As indicated A000 COVER SHEET KMT CAD 05/03/2024 358_2024 20 1 1 5 C O U N T Y R D 1 0 CO R C O R A N , M N 5 5 3 4 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN P&Z SUBMITTAL 05/03/2024 07/02/2024 DO M I N O ' S SH E L L SHEET INDEX NUMBER SHEET NAME REVISION ARCHITECTURAL A000 COVER SHEET A001 CODE PLAN A050 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A100 ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN A580 EXTERIOR ELEVS & SECTION A800 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS CIVIL C200 SITE PLAN C400 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE Attachment 7d7. EXTERIOR INTERIOR APPLICABLE CODES BUILDING CODE: 2020 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE ENERGY CODE: 2024 MINNESOTA COMMERCIAL ENERGY CODE ACCESSIBILITY: 2020 MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE MECHANICAL: 2020 MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODE PLUMBING: 2020 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE FIRE: 2020 MINNESOTA FIRE CODE ELECTRICAL: MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL CODE CHAPTER 3: USE AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION PROPOSED OCCUPANCY: "B" (CLASSIFICATION) CHAPTER 5: BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS BUILDING AREA: 1,134 GFA; CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B BUILDING SPRINKLED: NO 504.3 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT: 40'-0" 504.4 ALLOWABLE STORIES: 2 STORIES 506.2 ALLOWABLE AREA: 9,000 SF ALLOWABLE CHAPTER 6: TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION EXISTING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME:0 EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS:0 INTERIOR BEARING WALLS:0 NONBEARLING EXTERIOR WALLS AND PARITIONS:0 (10 < X < 30) NONBEARING INTERIOR WALLS AND PARTIONS:0 FLOOR CONSTRUCTION:0 ROOF CONSTRUCTION:0 CHAPTER 8: INTERIOR FINISHES OCCUPANCY GROUP: "B" (CLASSIFICATION) SPRINKLED: NO 803.13 INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAYS AND RAMPS AND EXIT PASSAGEWAYS: B CORRIDORS AND EXIT ENCLOSURE FOR EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAYS: B ROOMS AND ENCLOSED SPACES: C CHAPTER 10: MEANS OF EGRESS 1004 FUNCTION OF SPACE: INDOOR ROOM# ROOM NAME LOAD FACTOR OCCUPANT LOAD (PER 1004.5) • 100 TENANT SPACE 150 / 789 005.26 • 101 WALK-IN COOLER 300 / 201 000.67 TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD: 005.93 1006.2 NUMBER OF EXITS: 1 REQUIRED; 1 PROVIDED 1006.2.1 COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL: <100'-0" REQUIRED; 53'-1" PROV 1017.2 EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE: <200'-0" REQUIRED; 53'-1" PROV 1020.1 CORRIDORS CONSTRUCTION: 0-HOUR RATED WITH EXISTING SPRINKLER SYSTEM CHAPTER 29: PLUMBING SYSTEMS 2902.01MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIXTURES • TENANT RESTROOMS BY INTERIOR BUILDOUT - SEPERATELY PERMITTED OCCUPANTS 00"0.0" 00 EXIT WIDTH REQ. EXIT WIDTH PROV. FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATION - FINAL LOCATION BY G.C., SEE LIFE SAFETY NOTE #5 FOR ADD INFO EGRESS ROUTE CEILING MOUNTED EXIT LIGHT - REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PATH OF TRAVEL: 53'-1" 792 SF TENANT SPACE 100 203 SF WALK-IN COOLER 101 36"1.18" 5.92 PATH OF TRAVEL: 49'-4" 5 A580 5 A580 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number ISSUE DATE 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 763-553-7927 WWW.TANDGARCH.COM CITY STAMP AREA PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION STRACK CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 715 15TH AVE NE, ST. JOSEPH, MN 56374 320-251-5933 WWW.STRACKCO.COM 7/ 2 / 2 0 2 4 8 : 4 4 : 5 8 P M As indicated A001 CODE PLAN KMT AUTHOR 05/03/2024 358_2024 20 1 1 5 C O U N T Y R D 1 0 CO R C O R A N , M N 5 5 3 4 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN P&Z SUBMITTAL 05/03/2024 07/02/2024 DO M I N O ' S SH E L L CODE INFORMATION CODE PLAN LEGEND LIFE SAFETY PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE FOR ADDITIONAL ACCESSIBILITY AND/ OR EGRESS REQUIREMENTS 2. CONTINUATION OF ACCESSIBLE AND EGRESS ROUTE OF TRAVEL BEYOND THE AREA OF WORK BY OTHERS 3. EXITS, EXIT SIGNS, FIRE ALARM PANELS, HOSE CABINETS, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND STANDPIPE CONNECTIONS (AS APPLICABLE) SHALL NOT BE CONCEALED BY CURTAINS, MIRRORS, OR OTHER DECORATIVE MATERAIL(S) 4. ALL EXIT DOORS SHALL BE READILY OPENABLE FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT 5. FIRE EXTINGUISHER ARE TO BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA FIRE CODE. MULTI-PURPOSE EXTINGUISHERS REQUIRE A MINIMUM RATING OF 4A:2BC (10 LB) AND SPACED WITH MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE OF 75'-0 FROM ANY POINT TO A FIRE EXTINGUISHER. K-CLASS PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ARE REQUIRED IN COMMERCIAL KITCHENS, D-CLASS PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN MACHINE SHOPS 1/4" = 1'-0"1 ARCHITECTURAL CODE PLAN REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE EXTERIOR INTERIOR A580 4 A580 3 A580 2 A580 1 1 2 4 66 7 9 8 9 9 10 15 16 8 19 20 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number ISSUE DATE 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 763-553-7927 WWW.TANDGARCH.COM CITY STAMP AREA PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION STRACK CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 715 15TH AVE NE, ST. JOSEPH, MN 56374 320-251-5933 WWW.STRACKCO.COM 7/ 2 / 2 0 2 4 8 : 4 4 : 5 9 P M 3/32" = 1'-0" A050 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN KMT AUTHOR 05/03/2024 358_2024 20 1 1 5 C O U N T Y R D 1 0 CO R C O R A N , M N 5 5 3 4 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN P&Z SUBMITTAL 05/03/2024 07/02/2024 DO M I N O ' S SH E L L GENERAL SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ARCHTIECTURAL SITE PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY - CIVIL ENGINEERING IS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL PROVIDED BY THE OWNER AS NEEDED; NOT IN CONTRACT 2. ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW - TYPICAL 3. ALL SIGNAGE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY - PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL 4. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY -REFER TO DESIGN- BUILD ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ADD. INFO. - REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR BUILDING MOUNTED FIXTURES - COORDINATE FINAL LOCATIONS WITH OWNER IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 5. GC TO VERIFY THAT ALL ENTRANCE LANDINGS ARE FLUSH WITH FINISHED FLOOR AND PATCH/ REPAIR AS REQUIRED 6. GC TO VERIFY THAT ALL PAVED SURFACES ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING SLOPE AWAY TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE SITE PLAN KEYNOTES 3/32" = 1'-0"1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 BUILDING ENTRY/ EXIT STOOP LOCATION - REFER TO STRUCT TYPICAL STOOP DETAIL FOR ADD. INFO. - SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING AT MAX 2% - MAINTAIN ADA REQUIREMENTS PER 2020 MAC BUILDING FOOTPRINT, REFER TO PLAN SET FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES BOLLARD LOCATION, SEE CIVIL FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES REFER TO CIVIL DWGS FOR EXTENTS OF LANDSCAPING, SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY SEE CIVIL FOR 1 1/2" WATER SERVICE SCUPPER LOCATION, GC TO PROVIDE GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT, REFER TO ELEVATIONS FOR ADD INFO DASHED LINE INDICATES APPROX LOCATION OF MECH UNIT, EXHAUST FAN AND/OR ROOF HATCH, GC TO FIELD VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS DURING BIDDING, SEE ROOF PLAN FOR ADD INFO SEE CIVIL PLAN FOR MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SITE NEW EXTERIOR MTL BUILDING AWNING WITH INTEGRAL GUTTER, REFER TO SECTIONS FOR ADD INFO ACCESSIBLE STALL, SEE CIVIL FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES MONUMENT SIGN UNDER DEFERRED SUBMITTAL BY OWNER, GC TO PROVIDE CONDUIT WITH PULLSTRING FOR SITE LIGHTING WHERE REQ, SHOWN FOR REFERENCE SIGN FOUNDATION, GC TO COORDINATE WITH SIGN MANUF FOR REQUIREMENTS UNDER DEFERRED SUBMITTAL, SHOWN FOR REFERENCE GAS METER, GC TO COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH OWNER PRIOR TO ROUGH IN, SEE CIVIL AND MECH FOR ADD INFO LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS, REFER TO ELEC AND CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFO TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE A051 FOR ADD INFO ACCESSIBLE CURB, SEE CIVIL FOR ADD INFO ELECTRICAL SERVICE, SEE ELEC PLANS BY GC UNDER DEFERRED SUBMITTAL PICKUP SPEAKER CALL AND/OR ROPE DETECTOR FOR OLO WINDOW, GC TO COORDINATE WITH OWNER REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO INSTALL, PROVIDE REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL SITE INFO SEE CIVIL FOR 4" WASTE20 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE EXTERIOR INTERIOR GENERAL FLOOR PLAN NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FACE OF SHEATHING OR MASONRY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2. WALL TYPES WITH FIRE RATINGS SHALL CONTINUE FROM FLOOR TO FLOOR OR ROOF ABOVE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 3. THE HINGE SIDE OF ALL INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES SHALL BE PLACED 4" FROM THE ADJACENT INTERIOR WALL AS MEASURED TO THE JAMB, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INTERIOR DOORS PLACED IN MASONRY WALLS SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 4" AND MAXIMUM OF 8" AWAY FROM WALLS TO COORDINATE WITH MASONRY COURSING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 4. FIRE DAMPERS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE DUCTS PENETRATE FIRE-RATED WALLS, FLOORS, OR CEILING ASSEMBLIES 5. ALL INTERIOR PARTITIONS IN EXCESS OF 30'-0" OF LENGTH SHALL HAVE FULL HEIGHT CONTROL JOINTS INSTALLED WITH 30'-0" MAXIMUM SPACING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, WHERE POSSIBLE, ALIGN CONTROL JOINTS TO DOORS AND WINDOWS 6. FIXTURES, FURNITURE, VENDING, AND EQUIPMENT SUPPLIED BY OWNER, SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY, REFER TO EQUIPMENT PLANS 7. FLOOR FINISH TRANSITIONS OCCUR AT CENTERLINE OF DOOR FRAME UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 8. USE VINYL REDUCER STRIPS IN THICKNESS TO MATCH ADJACENT FLOOR MATERIALS - PROVIDE AT EDGES OF RESILIENT FLOOR WHEREVER EDGE IS EXPOSED - SUBMIT SAMPLES FOR PROFILE AND COLOR SELECTION 9. ALL MISC PANELS, FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS, EXPOSED DUCTING PARTS, LOUVERS, VENTILATION COVERS AND ANY EQUIPMENT NOT FACTORY FINISHED SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT SURFACE ON WHICH IT OCCURS 10. REFER TO FINISH SCHEDULES, CEILING PLANS, AND ELEVATIONS FOR FURTHER FINISH INFORMATION 11. ANY EXPOSED SINK PIPES TO BE WRAPPED TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS 20' - 0"26' - 8"13' - 0" 14 ' - 3 1 / 8 " 6" 1' - 0"13' - 10"5' - 4"39' - 6" 16' - 0" 14 ' - 7 " 59' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 4 " 6" 14 ' - 1 0 " 5 A580 5 A580 13 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 4' - 6" 792 SF TENANT SPACE 100 203 SF WALK-IN COOLER 101 100A 101 59' - 8" 3' - 1 0 " 6" 1" 11 ' - 4 " 1' - 8 " 1" 1' - 8 " 6" 1 2 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 4' - 8"6' - 0"3' - 2" 100B Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number ISSUE DATE 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 763-553-7927 WWW.TANDGARCH.COM CITY STAMP AREA PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION STRACK CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 715 15TH AVE NE, ST. JOSEPH, MN 56374 320-251-5933 WWW.STRACKCO.COM 7/ 2 / 2 0 2 4 8 : 4 4 : 5 9 P M As indicated A100 ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN KMT CAD 05/03/2024 358_2024 20 1 1 5 C O U N T Y R D 1 0 CO R C O R A N , M N 5 5 3 4 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN P&Z SUBMITTAL 05/03/2024 07/02/2024 DO M I N O ' S SH E L L 1/4" = 1'-0"1 ARCH FLOOR PLAN BUILDING ENTRY/ EXIT STOOP LOCATION - REFER TO STRUCT TYPICAL STOOP DETAIL FOR ADD. INFO. - SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING AT MAX 2% - MAINTAIN ADA REQUIREMENTS PER 2020 MAC WIC BY OWNER VERIFY EXTENTS WITH OWNER INCLUDING SLAB REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO INSTALL, SEE STRUCT FOR ADD INFO INTERIOR BUILDOUT BY TENANT UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT GC TO PROVIDE NEW ELECTRICAL METER WITH SERVICE, VERIFY WITH OWNER PANEL SIZE AND LOCATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, SEE ELEC DWGS FOR ADD INFO - DEFERRED SUBMITTAL BY GC REFER TO ROOF PLAN FOR RTU LOCATION(S) FOR TENANT SPACE GC TO PROVIDE 1 1/2" COLD WATER LINE WITH METER, REVIEW LOCATION OF PLUMBING STUB WIH CIVIL PRIOR TO TO INSTALLATION GC TO PROVIDE 4" WASTE LINE WITHIN BUILDING SPACE, SEE CIVIL DWGS FOR ADD INFO GC TO PROVIDE GAS PIPE AND METER SIZED TO DELIVER A VOLUME EQUIVALENT TO ONE MILLION BTUH TO EA TENANT SPACE, REFER ROOF PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, SEE MEP DWGS FOR ADD INFO PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITHIN SHELL SPACE, FINAL LOCATION BY G.C. (MAX SEPARATION TRAVEL DISTANCE 75''-0") GC TO PROVIDE EXIT SIGNAGE WITH EM LIGHTING AT DOOR PER CODE, SEE ELEC DWGS FOR ADD INFO GC TO PROVIDE 4" CONC SLAB WITHIN TENANT SPACE, PROVIDE 10 MIL VAPOR BARRIER W/ SAND BASE AS REQ, VERIFY REQ WITH GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SEE STRUCTURAL FOR ADDTIONAL INFORMATION NOT USED FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE FINISH FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. COOLER 108' -0" ROOF 111' -6" T.O. PARAPET 116' -0" T.O. PARAPET 2 118' -0" T.O. PARAPET 3 120' -0" SID-1 FINISH FLOOR 100' -0" ROOF 111' -6" T.O. PARAPET 2 118' -0" T.O. PARAPET 3 120' -0" MTL-1 SID-2 1 3 6"1' - 10"11' - 4"1' - 10"6" STN-1 MTL-2 FINISH FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. COOLER 108' -0" ROOF 111' -6" T.O. PARAPET 116' -0" T.O. PARAPET 2 118' -0" T.O. PARAPET 3 120' -0" STN-1 SID-2 SID-3 SID-1 VINYL COOLER BY OWNER 100A 7' - 6"10' - 0"2' - 6" 20' - 0" 100B FINISH FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. COOLER 108' -0" ROOF 111' -6" T.O. PARAPET 116' -0" T.O. PARAPET 2 118' -0" T.O. PARAPET 3 120' -0" MTL-1 MTL-1 SID-3 SID-2 COOLER BY OWNER STN-1 MTL-1 2 SID-1 39' - 7"5' - 3"3' - 0"9' - 0"2' - 0"1' - 0" 59' - 10" 2 7 ELEVATION MATERIAL SF'S GALVALUME (COOLER): 127 SF SIDING-2: 687 SF SID-3: 170 SF STN-1: 152 SF STOREFRONT: 28 SF FINISH FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. COOLER 108' -0" ROOF 111' -6" T.O. PARAPET 116' -0" T.O. PARAPET 2 118' -0" T.O. PARAPET 3 120' -0" 792 SF TENANT SPACE 100 203 SF WALK-IN COOLER 101 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number ISSUE DATE 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 763-553-7927 WWW.TANDGARCH.COM CITY STAMP AREA PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION STRACK CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 715 15TH AVE NE, ST. JOSEPH, MN 56374 320-251-5933 WWW.STRACKCO.COM 7/ 2 / 2 0 2 4 8 : 4 5 : 0 2 P M 3/16" = 1'-0" A580 EXTERIOR ELEVS & SECTION KMT AUTHOR 05/03/2024 358_2024 20 1 1 5 C O U N T Y R D 1 0 CO R C O R A N , M N 5 5 3 4 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN P&Z SUBMITTAL 05/03/2024 07/02/2024 DO M I N O ' S SH E L L 3/16" = 1'-0"4 DRIVE-THRU ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"3 DRIVER PICK UP ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"2 FRONT ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"1 REAR ELEVATION STN-1 ROCKMOUNT STACKED STONE COAL CANYON SID-1 PREFINISHED LAP SIDING JAMES HARDIE GRAY SLATE SID-2 LUX METAL OR EQUIV METAL SIDING W/ 6" REVEALS SID-3 PREFINISHED NICHIHA SIDING ILLUMINATION SERIES CUSTOM COLOR TRICORN BLACK REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE EXTERIOR ELEV. NOTES 1. REVIEW ALL MANUFACTURER RECOMMNEDATIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF EXTEIOR MATERIAL AS SCHEDULED 2. ALL SIGNAGE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY -PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE POWER AS REQ, COORDINATE LOCATION WITH OWNER PRIOR TO ROUGH IN 3. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY -REFER TO DESIGN- BUILD ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ADD. INFO. -COORDINATE FINAL LOCATIONS WITH OWNER IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 4. GC TO VERIFY THAT ALL ENTRANCE LANDINGS ARE FLUSH W ITH FINISHED FLOOR AND PATCH/ REPAIR AS REQUIRED 5. GC TO VERIFY THAT ALL PAVED SURFACES ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING SLOPE AWAY TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE 6. PROVIDE FLASHING AT GRADE AND/OR PAVED SURFACES AS REQ, REFER TO SECTIONS FOR ADD INFO EXTERIOR ELEV. KEYNOTES BOLLARD, SEE CIVIL FOR ADD INFO SIGNAGE BY TENANT, GC TO COORDINATE POWER AS REQ, VERIFY EXTENDS IN FIELD WITH ALL OTHER TRADES NOT USED WALL SCONCE SCUPPER WITH DOWNSPOUT OVERFLOW SCUPPER PREMANUF AWNING DRIVE THRU WINDOW, SEE SCHED FOR ADD INFO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3/16" = 1'-0"5 SECTION 1 Scale Date Drawn By Checked By Project Number ISSUE DATE 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 763-553-7927 WWW.TANDGARCH.COM CITY STAMP AREA PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION STRACK CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 715 15TH AVE NE, ST. JOSEPH, MN 56374 320-251-5933 WWW.STRACKCO.COM 7/ 2 / 2 0 2 4 8 : 4 5 : 0 2 P M A800 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS KMT AUTHOR 05/03/2024 358_2024 20 1 1 5 C O U N T Y R D 1 0 CO R C O R A N , M N 5 5 3 4 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN P&Z SUBMITTAL 05/03/2024 07/02/2024 DO M I N O ' S SH E L L REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE STO STO STO X X X X X X X X X POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH PO H PO H PO H PO H PO H PO H SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SA N SAN SAN SA N SN SN G WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WA T WAT WAT 4 5 4 FFE=963.00 20.6713.12 49.54 : 32.6Steering Angle 8.53 8.53 6.0 Fire Truck feet : : : Width Track Lock to Lock Time SHEET NUMBER: DATE: Ph o n e : h L W e Z a W e r ' r L Y e 6 X L W e Fa x 0 L n n e W o n N a 0 1 To l l F r e e LI C E N S E N O . I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D L A N D S U R V E Y O R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E ST A T E O F M I N N E S O T A I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A VE R T I C A L S C A L E : HO R I Z O N T A L S C A L E : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : DE S I G N E D : IN I T I A L I S S U E : RE V I S I O N S : PR E P A R E D F O R : N: \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 \ D W G \ E X H I B I T \ 0 0 5 1 7 6 5 . 0 1 X B 0 1 . D W G 05/17/24 CO R C O R A N D O M I N O ' S XB100 CO R C O R A N , M N CO R C O R A N DO M I N O ' S TU R N MO V E M E N T 05 / 1 7 / 2 4 0 5 / 1 7 / 2 4 0 5 / 1 7 / 2 4 ... 05 / 0 3 / 2 4 71 5 1 5 T H A V E N E ST . J O S E P H , M N 5 6 3 7 4 ST R A C K C O N S T R U C T I O N 43 0 1 9 GR E T C H E N S C H R O E D E R . . 44 0 1 8 JE F F W E S T E N D O R F FOR PERMIT ONLY © 2 0 2 4 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 0'20'40'60' 1" = 20' PE R M I T S E T .... 05 / 1 7 / 2 4 .... 20 ' 4' o r 2 ' PROJECT NUMBER: 0051765.01 Attachment 7d8. File Location Client Sales rep Date Revision Printed artwork colors are not always representative of final product colors. Please refer to specifications for call out or salesman for samples. These drawings are the exclusive property of Bauer Sign Company. Not to be duplicated in any way without expressed written permission! FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION IS CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITY Web: www.bauersignusa.comPhone: 262-784-0500Fax: 262-784-6675 2500 South 170th New Berlin, Wisconsin Proudly Made in the USA! Scale: 1/4” - 1’ OPTION 1 PG 1/3 Domino’s Corcoran - 20115 County Rd 10 Jordan cb 07/24/24 cb 07/25/24 EXISTING PROPOSED RED PORTION OF TILE FACES MAIN ROAD PROFILE VIEW SIDE 2; SCALE 1/8” - 1’ 8'- ¾” 6'-11¼" 4’- 0” 8’-0” 8’ - 8 ” 16 ’ - 0 ” 1’-2” 48 ” 40 ” 96” SPECIFICATIONS FABRICATE AND INSTALL A D/F INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED PYLON SIGN WITH MANUAL MESSAGE BOARD. TILES TO BE CHANNEL LETTER MODULES WITH #7328 WHITE ACRYLIC / 1” WHITE TRIMCAPS .040 WHITE ALUM RETURNS MANUAL MESSAGE BOARD HOUSED IN CABINET BUILT WITH ALUM EXTRUSION, 1.5” RETAINERS PTM 3M 3630-127 INTENSE BLUE POLE TO BE 6.75” OD, PAINTED WHITE ILLUMINATED WITH WHITE LEDs POWERED WITH APPROPRIATE LOAD POWER SUPPLIES GRAPHICS TO BE 3M 3630-127 INTENSE BLUE AND 3630-33 RED SHOWN AS 3LINES 10” COPY TILE: 96 x 48 = 32 SQ FT MESSAGE BOARD CAB: 48 X 96 =32 SQ FT TOTAL = 64 SQ FT Attachment 7d9. File Location Client Sales rep Date Revision Printed artwork colors are not always representative of final product colors. Please refer to specifications for call out or salesman for samples. These drawings are the exclusive property of Bauer Sign Company. Not to be duplicated in any way without expressed written permission! FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION IS CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITY Web: www.bauersignusa.comPhone: 262-784-0500Fax: 262-784-6675 2500 South 170th New Berlin, Wisconsin Proudly Made in the USA! Scale: 3/8” - 1’ OPTION 1 PG 2/3 Domino’s Corcoran - 20115 County Rd 10 Jordan cb 07/24/24 cb 07/25/24 White blockout vinyl applied overBlue Vinyl border (blue vinyl thickness matches blue trimcap) 4’-3⅛” (51⅛”) 14’-10⅛” 25’-2⅛” 19-7¾” 51⅛”6½” 50⅛” 25⅞” 30" SPECIFICATIONS FABRICATE AND INSTALL ONE SET OF INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED, RACEWAY MOUNTED CHANNEL LETTERS AND STAND ALONE TILE. FACES TO BE #7328 WHITE ACRYLIC RETURNS TO BE .040X5” AND BACKS TO BE .040 ALUMINUM EXTERIORS PAINTED WHITE (LOGO), PTM INTENSE BLUE 3630-127 (LETTERS) ILLUMINATED WITH WHITE LEDs LOGO MODULE FACES TO BE DECORATED WITH TRANSLUCENT RED 3630-33 AND INTENSE BLUE 3630-127 VINYL LETTERS TO HAVE INTENSE BLUE 3630-127 VINYL BORDER APPLIED AND 3M BLOCKOUT WHITE FOR “S” INSERTS TRIMCAPS TO BE 1” WHITE, PTM INTENSE BLUE 3630-127 FOR LETTERS ONLY POWERED WITH APPROPRIATE LOAD POWER SUPPLIES RACEWAY TO BE 3.5” x 5”x 297.5” EXTRUSION PAINTED TBD TO MATCH WALL *”D” Sized to 30”, everything else is in proportion/sizes listed are to nearest 1/8”QTY: 1 QTY: 1 4’- 0” 8’-0” 8'- ¾” 8' - ¾ ” 5’ - 0” 22 ½ ” TILE: 50.125 x 25.875 = 9 SQ FT “DOMINO’S”: 30 X 178.125 =37.11 SQ FT PICK UP MODULE: 22.5 x 60 = 9.38 SQ FT TOTAL = 55.49 SQ FT STAND ALONE TILE: 96 x 48 = 32 SQ FT File Location Client Sales rep Date Revision Printed artwork colors are not always representative of final product colors. Please refer to specifications for call out or salesman for samples. These drawings are the exclusive property of Bauer Sign Company. Not to be duplicated in any way without expressed written permission! FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION IS CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITY Web: www.bauersignusa.comPhone: 262-784-0500Fax: 262-784-6675 2500 South 170th New Berlin, Wisconsin Proudly Made in the USA! PROPOSED OPTION 1 PG 3/3 Domino’s Corcoran - 20115 County Rd 10 Jordan cb 07/24/24 cb 07/25/24 File Location Client Sales rep Date Revision Printed artwork colors are not always representative of final product colors. Please refer to specifications for call out or salesman for samples. These drawings are the exclusive property of Bauer Sign Company. Not to be duplicated in any way without expressed written permission! FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION IS CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITY Web: www.bauersignusa.comPhone: 262-784-0500Fax: 262-784-6675 2500 South 170th New Berlin, Wisconsin Proudly Made in the USA! Scale: 1/2” - 1’ OPTION 2 PG 1/2 TILE: (40.125 x 20.625) = 5.75 SQ FT + “DOMINO’S” (142.5 x 24) = 23.75 SQ FT + PICK UP MODULE: (48 X 18) = 6 SQ FT TOTAL = 35.5 SQ FT. TILE: (26.75 x 13.75) = 2.55 SQ FT + “DOMINO’S” (95 x 16) = 10.56 SQ FT + PICK UP MODULE: (32 X 12) = 2.67 SQ FT. TOTAL = 15.78 SQ FT.TILE: (50.125 x 25.875) = 9 SQ FT Domino’s Corcoran - 20115 County Rd 10 Jordan cb 07/24/24 cb 07/25/24 White blockout vinyl applied overBlue Vinyl border (blue vinyl thickness matches blue trimcap) 2’-3¼” (27¼”) 7’-11”10’-5¾”27¼” 26¾” 13¾” 16" 3’-4⅞” (40⅞”) 11’-10½” 15-8⅝” 40⅞” 40⅛” 20⅝” 24" 20’-1¾” 4’ - 0” 18 ” 13’-5⅛” 2’ - 8” 12 ” 4’-3⅛” (51⅛”) 50⅛” 25⅞” 51⅛” File Location Client Sales rep Date Revision Printed artwork colors are not always representative of final product colors. Please refer to specifications for call out or salesman for samples. These drawings are the exclusive property of Bauer Sign Company. Not to be duplicated in any way without expressed written permission! FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION IS CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITY Web: www.bauersignusa.comPhone: 262-784-0500Fax: 262-784-6675 2500 South 170th New Berlin, Wisconsin Proudly Made in the USA! Scale: 3/8” - 1’ OPTION 2 PG 2/2 Domino’s Corcoran - 20115 County Rd 10 Jordan cb 07/24/24 cb 07/25/24 SPECIFICATIONS FABRICATE AND INSTALL ONE 16” AND TWO 24” SETS OF INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED, RACEWAY MOUNTED CHANNEL LETTERS AND THREE STAND ALONE TILES. FACES TO BE #7328 WHITE ACRYLIC RETURNS TO BE .040X5” AND BACKS TO BE .040 ALUMINUM EXTERIORS PAINTED WHITE (LOGO), PTM INTENSE BLUE 3630-127 (LETTERS) ILLUMINATED WITH WHITE LEDs LOGO MODULE FACES TO BE DECORATED WITH TRANSLUCENT RED 3630-33 AND INTENSE BLUE 3630-127 VINYL LETTERS TO HAVE INTENSE BLUE 3630-127 VINYL BORDER APPLIED AND 3M BLOCKOUT WHITE FOR “S” INSERTS TRIMCAPS TO BE 1” WHITE, PTM INTENSE BLUE 3630-127 FOR LETTERS ONLY POWERED WITH APPROPRIATE LOAD POWER SUPPLIES RACEWAYS TO BE 3.5” x 5” EXTRUSION PAINTED TBD TO MATCH WALLS West Panel South Pane l North Panel Preliminary designs. Final design to be approved by the city before installation. 3D Rendering Example City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-110 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE ON A QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR PROPERTY NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 50 & COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 23- 119-23-43-0003) (CITY FILE NO. 24-027) WHEREAS, Kaukauna of Minnesota, LLC (“the applicant”) notified the City of an error in title on property legally described as follows: See Attachment A (the “Property”) WHEREAS, the City confirmed that the Property was never conveyed to the City as it was excepted from a conveyance of adjacent land, however, the final deed failed to list the excepted parcel, creating an error in title; WHEREAS, in order to correct this error, the applicant requested that the City sign a quit claim deed to convey any interest in the Property to Katie J. Goemann, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph Mark Andres; WHEREAS, the City confirms it has no interest in the Property and therefore is willing to execute the requested quit claim deed in order to assist in correcting the error. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council authorizes the City Administrator to sign the quit claim deed as requested. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Lanterman, Mark Lanterman, Mark Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of September 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jason (Jay) Tobin Agenda Item 7d11. City of Corcoran September 26, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-110 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT A Page 1 of 3 4889-6794-9539, v. 1 (Top 3 inches reserved for recording data) QUIT CLAIM DEED Business Entity to Business Entity Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks Form 10.3.5 (2013) eCRV Number: ___________________ DATE: September _____, 2024 DEED TAX DUE: $1.70 The total consideration for this transfer of property is $3,000.00 or less. FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the City of Corcoran, Minnesota (“Grantor”), hereby conveys and quitclaims to Katie J. Goemann, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph Mark Andres, also known as Joseph M. Andres, Joseph Andres and Joe Andres (“Grantee”), real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A; together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. Check here if all or part of the described real property is Registered (Torrens) Page 2 of 3 4889-6794-9539, v. 1 Grantor: City of Corcoran, Minnesota By ____________________________ Its ________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on September ______, 2024, by ______________as _______________ of City of Corcoran, Minnesota, Grantor. __________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires: _____________ THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Rinke Noonan (ISL/klb) 1015 West St. Germain, Suite 300 P.O. Box 1497 St. Cloud, MN 56302-1497 BP (320) 251-6700 File No. 14033-0036 TAX STATEMENTS FOR THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE SENT TO: Katie J. Goemann, Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph Mark Andres c/o Rebecca Bell RB Legal LLC 5801 Duluth Street, Suite 380 Golden Valley, MN 55422 Page 3 of 3 4889-6794-9539, v. 1 Exhibit A (Legal Description) Page 1 of 7 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item _7e__ City Council Meeting: September 24, 2024 Prepared By: Kendra Lindahl Topic: Concept Plan for 20130 Larkin Road (PID 26-119-23-13- 0006) (city file 22-059) Action Required: Feedback Review Deadline: October 11, 2024 1. Request The applicant, Ken Streeter, requests an opportunity to appear before the City Council to solicit informal comments for a concept plan to guide the property from Light Industrial to Medium Density Residential. 2. Background As part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update, the City Council reclassified this property from Medium Density Residential to Light Industrial to expand the existing industrial park directly east of this site to provide more business and employment opportunities in the City. A PUD for a five-lot industrial park with more than 500,000 sq. ft. of space was approved by the City Council on December 8, 2022. Those approvals will expire on December 8, 2024 unless an extension to the approvals is requested by the applicant and granted by the Council prior to that date. The City completed an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) for that project. The EAW included an infrastructure feasibility component. On August 11, 2022, the City Council issued a finding of “no need” for an EIS, based on the review of the EAW dated May 11, 2022. The EAW and feasibility study are available at City Hall. However, if the plan changes, the EAW would need to be updated for any new project that meets the EAW threshold. 3. Context Zoning and Land Use The 70.36-acre site is guided Light Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan and zoned Light Industrial (I-1) district. The site has an existing farmstead in the east-central portion of the site and the land use is agricultural. The site is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and the Southeast District. Page 2 of 7 Surrounding Properties All surrounding properties are located within the MUSA and Southeast District. The properties to the north, across County Road 50, are guided Parks/Open Space in the Comprehensive Plan and zoned Public/Institutional (P-I) district. Properties to the east are guided Light Industrial and zoned I-1 district. Properties to the south, located across Larkin Road, are guided Agricultural Preserve and Existing Residential and zoned Urban Reserve (UR) district. Properties to the west are guided Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential and zoned Medium Density Residential (RMF-1), Single Family Residential 2 (RSF-2) and UR districts. Natural Characteristics of the Site The Natural Resources Inventory (NRI) map identifies wet prairie wetlands along the west property line, old field uplands along the north and northeast portions of the site and a stream that runs along the east property line. The wetland delineation provided by the applicant identifies seven wetlands throughout the site. The eastern portion of the site is in the Shoreland Overlay district. 4. Analysis Concept Plan The applicant does not have a current development proposal but is seeking City Council feedback prior to submitting a request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning to reclassify the property from Light Industrial to Medium Density Residential. The Medium Density Land Use classification is intended to “accommodate mid-density clusters of small lots and attached townhomes, ranging from 5 to 8 units per acre.” The comprehensive plan would require 331 – 529 residential units on this site. The applicant’s plan shows 274 units on 66.15 net acres (70.36 gross acres), which does not meet the minimum standards for the request. A minimum of 57 additional units would need to be added to meet the minimum standards of the land use category. Lot Standards and Building Setbacks Figure 2 - Zoning Map Figure 3 - Concept Plan Page 3 of 7 If the Council supports the land use amendment to reclassify the land from Light Industrial to Medium Density Residential, the corresponding zoning district would be RMF-1 (Medium Density Residential). The district requirements are in the table below: The RMF-1 district allows single family detached homes, twinhomes and row townhomes (6 units per building maximum) as permitted uses and apartments and conditional uses. There is not adequate detail at this time to determine compliance with these standards. Parking and Drive Aisles The concept plans shows townhomes. Guest parking will be required. Access/Streets The concept plan shows a looped public street with access onto County Road 50 and Larkin Road with private drives to serve the homes between the gas line easement and Larkin Road. Private drives must comply with the standards in Section 945.020, Subd. 20(B) The City Engineer’s memo provides a number of recommended changes to the street alignment: Page 4 of 7 1. The plan should show an access road to the northwest corner of the site (as shown on the prior approvals) to align with the future City Park access 2. A local street should be stubbed to the west for access. 3. The street connection to County Road 50 shown on the plan would need to be approved by Hennepin County. 4. Sidewalks must be provided along all public streets in accordance with City policy, A feasibility study was completed as part of the EAW for industrial project and would need to be updated as part of a new EAW if this project were to proceed with a development proposal that includes 375 or more attached units. Offsite improvements may be necessary to mitigate transportation impacts. Such improvements may include turn lanes and intersection improvements along Larkin Road. If no EAW is required for the future project, the feasibility study would be required to be updated to determine off- site improvements. Landscaping No landscaping is depicted on the concept plan. The Southeast District Guidelines recommend site layout and landscaping be designed to work with the existing topography of the area, preserving rolling hills, woods, and wetlands and natural viewsheds and corridors. Landscape screens with berms, hedgerows, and a variety of native trees and shrubs should be incorporated to minimize undesirable views from the public realm. The development will impact the existing topography and agricultural view of the site. The site is subject to the landscape standards in Section 1060.070 which requires a minimum of one tree per residential unit. Additionally, guest parking must be landscaped to screen headlights. Overlay Districts There are seven wetlands on the site which are regulated by standards in Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. The wetland delineation was approved on October 25, 2021. The site plan does show impacts to the northern wetlands for a new street, which would require approval of a wetland mitigation plan if the road is approved. Wetland buffer strips are required to provide an average width of 25 ft. with a 15 ft. structure setback. Wetland buffer signs are required to be installed at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer, and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of 200 ft. along the buffer edge. Page 5 of 7 Shoreland Overlay district is located along the eastern edge of the site for the unnamed tributary stream. The proposed buildings comply with the required 50 ft. building setback for sewered structures from the ordinary high water level of the tributary stream. Buffers are required for the tributary stream with a minimum width of 20 ft. and an average width of 25 ft. Plans must show the setback and buffers for the tributary stream. Residential structures in the shoreland district are limited to a maximum building height of 25 feet. Tributary stream buffers shall be planted with a seed mix containing 100% perennial native plant species. Buffer areas must also be identified with buffer monuments where the buffer crosses a lot line, and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer with a maximum spacing of 300 ft. along the buffer edge. The Shoreland Overlay district has additional standards for stormwater management, including that impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed 25% of the lot area. The proposed development is also subject to the performance standards in the Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines in Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance. No building plans are available at this time. Easements There is a gas line easement that impacts the layout of the proposed development. The applicant should also ensure the electrical transmission line easement situated on the property does not restrict any of the proposed development. No improvements shall be located within required easements, except a new public street crossing. Easements must also be provided over the wetlands and shoreland and their respective buffer areas. Grading No grading is depicted on the concept plan. The City Engineer has noted this project will trigger both the City of Corcoran and the Elm Creek Watershed requirements for a stormwater management system. Final approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission must be attained before any site grading or activity commence. Utilities The site is located within the MUSA boundary and will be served by sewer and water. The applicant will be responsible for connecting to the sanitary sewer and watermain at the northeast edge of the development and bringing it to serve the development. The Page 6 of 7 City Engineer has noted the sanitary system shall connect to the southeast corner of the development as shown in the Comprehensive Plan. Stormwater The applicant has proposed six stormwater ponds. As part of the development review plan, the applicant would be required to comply with state, watershed and local stormwater standards. The Southeast District guidelines describe a mix of ponds, fountains and other water elements to provide focal amenities should be employed within a framework of an environmentally responsible and visually pleasing strategy to manage stormwater. A stormwater management plan shall be provided by the applicant to confirm the proposed stormwater facilities are in accordance with the City of Corcoran and watershed standards. Parks and Trails Under the current ordinance, park dedication of land is required at 19% of the net pre- development area for Medium Density land (12.57 acres) or market equivalent in cash. The Parks and Trails Plan map from the Comprehensive Plan identifies a proposed off- road trail along the length of the east property line. The trail is part of the Three Rivers Park District (TRPD) Diamond Lake Regional Trail. The plans must accommodate a 10- foot wide bituminous trail in a 20-foot wide easement. The trail must comply with TRPD design standards. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) An EAW is required for the project if 250 detached units or 375 attached units are proposed (or an equivalent combination). This site would be required to develop between 331 – 529 units if reguided to Medium Density. Summary The City of Corcoran reclassified this property from residential to industrial as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update to provide more opportunities for industrial land in the City, which will provide jobs and tax base. However, the City must balance these desires with other development standards adopted by the City. This is the only vacate industrial property in the Southeast District (except for two parcels on 75th Avenue that are less than three acres each). There is an EAW underway for the one remaining Industrial property in the Northeast District. There is available Industrial land in the Southwest District, but municipal sanitary sewer and water are not yet available to those areas, making development of those parcels more challenging. Page 7 of 7 The Council must evaluate the need for Industrial land to create jobs and tax base in the City against a desire to provide more housing opportunities. The City has a high level of discretion in approving a request for reguiding and rezoning. If the Council is supportive of the change, the applicant indicates that they will apply for the reguiding and rezoning and then bring the site to market to find a residential developer. Two questions: 1. Does the Council support the change from Light Industrial to Medium Density Residential? 2. If so, does the Council support a reguiding/rezoning absent a development plan? While concept plan is not intended to be the actual development proposal, the Council should provide feedback that the applicant could share with potential buyers/developers. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss the sketch plan and provide the applicant with informal comments. Any opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the City Council are considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. Attachments 1. Site Location Map 2. Survey 3. Concept Plan received August 7, 2024 4. City Engineer Memo dated August 22, 2024 5. Land Use Map 6. Zoning Map 7. Natural Resources Inventory Map 8. Parks and Trails Plan Map 9. Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines Hennepin County Property Map Date: 9/19/2024 Comments:PARCEL ID: 2611923130006 OWNER NAME: Gary D Schutte Et Al PARCEL ADDRESS: 20130 Larkin Rd,Corcoran MN 55340 PARCEL AREA: 68.68 acres, 2,991,888 sq ft A-T-B: Torrens SALE PRICE: SALE DATE: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2023, PAYABLE 2024 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $779,800 TAX TOTAL: $7,964.16 ASSESSED 2024, PAYABLE 2025 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $860,500 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2024 1:9,600 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Schutte Property Rezoning Concept Plan Review Date: August 22, 2024 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents: 1. Medum Density Concept Plan by Moore Engineering Dated 07/30/2024. Comments: General: 1. A feasibility study was completed for the previous light industrial development on this property to identify the impacts on the available City infrastructure. If the project continues, the feasibility study should be updated to understand the impacts of the revised land uses on the City infrastructure. 2. The proposed project will trigger both the City of Corcoran and the Elm Creek Watershed requirements for a stormwater management system. Final approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission must be attained before any site grading or activity may commence. Plat: 1. The applicant shall have all drainage and utility easements provided and shown and all platting requirements met per the City Code. 1. An existing high pressure gas main and associated easement are present within this development. The gas company will review and approve all improvements and encroachments within the easement. 2. In addition to the gas easement, an Electric Transmission Line Easement is located along the southern portion of the site. The applicant shall ensure that the easement does not restrict any of the proposed development. 2. ROW and easement widths of roadways will be reviewed as the plan develops. Due to the trunk sanitary sewer within the development, ROW and associated easements may need to be widened to accommodate utility corridors. Transportation/Site Plans 1. The previous feasibility study identified that turn lane improvements at the development entrance as well as turn lane improvements at Larkin Road and County Road 116 were necessary for the light industrial development. The impacts from the proposed land use would have to be reviewed to determine which mitigation measures are necessary. 2. The development shall provide an access road which terminates along the Northwest corner of the development with the intent that it will be extended north in the future. This access would ultimately align with the main access road to and through the City Park which is the preferred long-term alignment. August 2024 Schutte Rezoning Concept Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 3 3. A local road stub should be provided to the properties to the west. This could be utilized in the future should that area redevelop to reduce access location along Larkin Road. 4. A smaller roadway is shown to the north of the site connecting to County Road 50. Hennepin County should review the site plan and provide input on if this access can be used for development access or emergency access. Units are shown off of this road which would need to be constructed to City standards. 5. If the northern connection is an emergency access, the timing of the secondary access should be reviewed and approved by Public Safety. 6. Street lighting locations shall be reviewed by public safety and final lighting locations shall be determined at the time of final plat. 7. Regional trail and connections shall meet planning requirements. The regional trail shall be reviewed for its connection with the Master Park Plan as well as for conformance with the City of Corcoran Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy. Due to the regional nature of the trail and adjacent City Park, trail crossing enhancements should be anticipated. 8. The trail alignment should be reviewed by city parking and planning as it should be anticipated to be extended to the southern boundary of the project. 9. It appears that the roadways along the south of the development will be private. These shall incorporate a concrete apron at the entrances and the roadway designs shall meet city standards. 10. Sidewalks shall be incorporated into development plans. Grading/Erosion Control/Stormwater 1. A stormwater management plan shall be provided to confirm that stormwater management is in accordance with City of Corcoran and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Standards. 2. Reference the City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines for Development Review for standards for stormwater systems and modeling. 3. The wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage shall also be clearly identified and labeled. 4. Applicant shall ensure that downstream receiving waters (potentially wetlands) are not starved of necessary runoff. 5. If wetlands are impacted, they shall be reviewed and approved through the appropriate WCA permitting process. 6. At the time of Preliminary Plat, the wetland buffers should be identified as either newly established wetland buffers or whether they are existing buffers as defined by City Code. 7. All pedestrian ramps shall be ADA compliant and detailed designs shall be provided for all landings showing elevations in compliance with those requirements. 8. Easements shall be provided over all storm sewer pipes. Easements shall be shown on the utility plan to ensure they are adequate. 9. All drainage swales shall maintain a minimum of 2% slope and all slope should be 4:1 or flatter unless approved by the city engineer. 10. All walls higher than 4’ shall be designed by a certified engineer and the design and certification of those walls shall be provided to the city. 11. The proposed project is within the shoreland overlay district. In addition to meeting the overlay district design standards, the applicant shall keep this in mind when designing the stormwater management for the site, including site BMP’s. Stormwater for the site shall be managed during construction and post buildout to reduce impacts on adjacent natural features. August 2024 Schutte Rezoning Concept Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 3 Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. The watermain shall be extended to the southern parcel boundary along with the trunk sanitary sewer that is shown. The applicant shall be responsible for extending the 18” trunk sanitary main to the southern lot boundary. 2. An 8” sanitary sewer lateral shall be proved to the developments SE corner as shown in the City comprehensive plan and a 12” sewer stub shall be provided to the western boundary in accordance the comprehensive plan. Additional 8” lateral sewer stubs may be required to the west to ensure parcels to the west can be serviced with sewer. 3. The water pressure shall be reviewed with the feasibility study to determine if the water loop shown is sufficient or if a larger loop is necessary down Larkin Road from County Road 116. In the previous development plan, the applicant was able to loop water to the adjacent business park to meet necessary requirements. 4. The development application should incorporate a site for a future municipal well. 5. The City is capped at an allowable sewer capacity at the L-80 lift station to service SE Corcoran until the trunk sanitary sewer is extended south from NE Corcoran. Because of this, any changes in land use should closely monitor impacts on sewer and water demand within this area. In reviewing the preliminary information provided, the sewer demand for medium density housing is similar to that of light industrial. If this development moves forward, this should be more closely reviewed. End of Comments Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pion e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 10 Horseshoe Trl C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S e t tl e r s Rd Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C reek RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthFor k R u shCr eek 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 5/27/2029 1/22/2023 1/22/2023 5/27/2029 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 5/27/2029 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: \\MSPFSV02\DesignDepot\Library\Software\GIS\Client\City of Corcoran\City wide maps\2040 Future Land Use.mxd Date: 10/27/2021 Time: 9:57:35 AM User: LPSRemote Rural/Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public Parks/Open Space Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open Water Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) ñ ñ ñ [j [j s s s î î î î î ï ï ï 4567116 456719 456750 456730 456730 4567116 456710 456719 456750 456710 Sh a n n o nLa Schutte Rd Ch is h ol m Tr Su n d a n c e R d Ru sh Mea dow L a Will ow D r Larson Rd CSAH 10 H orses h o e B en d D r E C o rc o r a n Tr W C or c o r anT r Fo x V a l le y D r M y s t i q ue Dr H a g e Dr O a k d a l e D r S u nny H i l l La Brand yw i n e R d Woodland Tr Gleason Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Mea dow Greek Dr CS A H 1 9 Tessmer Rd Rebecca Park Tr Oakdale Dr H ighBluff La Pio neer Tr CSAH 50 73rdAv e N Meister Rd Homestead Tr Ma p l e H i l l R d Be c h t o l d R d 109th A v e N 97th Ave N Ka l k R d Larkin Rd Horseshoe Tr Ro l l in g H i l l sRd O l d S ettler s R d Stieg Rd Ca i n R d Tr a i l H a v e n R d 97th Ave N 93rd Ave N CR - 1 1 6 CSAH 10 CS A H 1 9 CSAH 50 Strehler Rd CSAH 10 Jubert Lake Scott Lake Cook Lake City Hall Old Public Works Public Works Official Zoning Map 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet City Limit 2040 MUSA ñ Government Building [j Public Park s Golf Course î Church ï Cemetery Zoning Districts: UR: Urban Reserve RR: Rural Residential RSF-1: Single Family Residential 1 RSF-2: Single Family Residential 2 RSF-3: Single Family Residential 3 RMF-1: Medium Density Residential RMF-2: Mixed Residential MP: Manufactured Home Park P-I: Public/Institutional TCR: Transitional Rural Commercial CR: Rural Commercial C-1: Neighborhood Commercial C-2: Community Commercial DMU: Downtown Mixed Use GMU: General Mixed Use BP: Business District I-1: Light Industrial PUD: Planned Unit Development Open Water Shoreland Overlay District Parcels Streams Prepared in July, 2024 ± Path: V:\2277\resource\gis\Corcoran\Pro\zoning_mapping\Zoning Map\Zoning Map.aprx Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pion e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 10 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S e t tl e r s Rd Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C r e e k RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthFor k R u sh C r eek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Natural Resource Inventory Areas.mxd Date: 1/7/2019 Time: 1:10:39 PM User: ShuJC0243 ^_Natural Community !(Rare Species OccurenceHigh Quality Natural Community Natural Plant Communities WetlandsWet PrairieEmergentShrubFloodplain ForestOpen WaterFlood Plain (Reed Canary Dominant) UplandsSavanna/PastureMaple/BasswoodOak ForestDisturbed WoodlandOld FieldMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-7Natural Resource Inventory Areas Note: Due to limitations of map scale, distribution and proportion of NaturalCommunity types within each colored area are approximate.Source:Natural Plant Communities, Rare Species Occurence (Natural Resource Inventory andManagement Plan, Nov. 2001, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates) 27 Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers % Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 Oakdale Dr B r i d l e P a t h J e f f r e y L n Abilene Ln Tr a i l L n HuntersRdg County Road 30 He a t h e r Ln Pion e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd County Road 10 Horseshoe Trl Ro b e r t L n H o r s e s h o e BendDr Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd GleasonP k w y Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 ESt Homestead Trl Ma p l e H i l l R d Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d S u n d a n c e Rd Country Rd Mo h a w k D r ElmSt Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd C ai n Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln Old Se t t le rs Rd County R oad 1 1 7 Stieg R d Be c h t o l d R d Ka l k R d Schutte Rd Meister Rd F o x V a l l e y Dr M y s t i q u e Dr H a g e Dr 93rd Ave N Sc hut t e Pl B r a n d y w i n e R d Chisholm T r l Tessmer Rd HighBluffLn Winc hest erTrl JubertLn R u s h C re e k RushCreek County Ditc h N u m b e r S i x t e e n Co u n t y Ditch N u mber Three SouthFor k R u s h C r e e k NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP 79 6 | District Principles Southeast District Concept Plan. The Southeast District is the spatial framework for these design standards. The Town Center and Downtown Core are nested within the district each with additional guidance to create the neighborhoods and places envisioned by the community. Commercial 0L[HG8VH High Density Residential Medium Density Residential /RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO Public / Semi-Public Mixed Residential Parks / Open Space Agricultural Preserve Industrial Not to Scale Southeast District Boundary Town Center Downtown Core /DQG8VH&ODVVLÀFDWLRQ Retail Residential Public Agriculture Industrial LEGEND District Boundaries Page 1 of 8 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7f. Planning Commission Meeting: September 26, 2024 Prepared By: Dwight Klingbeil Topic: M&J Wine Tasting Room Concept Plan (PID 08-119-23-23-0017 and 08-119-23-23- 0018) (City File No. 24-030) Action Required: Recommendation 1. Application Request Margaret and John Fernandez submitted a request for review of a sketch plan for a wine tasting room on the subject property and asks for Council feedback. 2. Background Zoning and Land Use The two parcels combined total 7.76 acres. They are both guided Rural/Ag Residential and zoned Rural Residential (RR). Significant portions of both parcels are also located within the Shoreland Overlay District, which has additional requirements beyond the RR District standards. The eastern parcel is currently used as a residence with vineyards on the property, and the western parcel is open space. The site is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Surrounding Properties All surrounding properties are all located outside of the MUSA. All surrounding properties are guided for Rural/Ag Residential and zoned Rural Residential (RR). The properties to the north, east, and west are currently used for residential, and the property to the south is currently used for Ag Residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site Figure 1 Site Location Page 2 of 8 Rush Creek intersects the southwest corner of the eastern parcel, and meanders through the western parcel. The Natural Resource Inventory map in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies a High-Quality Natural Community in the western parcel, as well as a greenway corridor through much of the west parcel and a portion of the southwest corner of the east parcel. The entirety of the west parcel and half of the east parcel are within the shoreland overlay district. Additionally, there are significant portions of the site located within the floodplain. 3. Analysis Concept Plan The applicants currently live on the property. The applicants grow grapes in their vineyards, process and bottle the wine on site, and sell the product on their website. The eastern parcel contains residential structure, two pole barns and three sheds. The cumulative footprint of the accessory structure is roughly ~2975 sq. ft. There are no structures existing or proposed for the western parcel. The applicants own both parcels and would like to expand their wine business beyond manufacturing. The applicant intends to repurpose the larger of the two pole barns to include a wine tasting room. Under this concept, they would continue to produce the wine, while also providing a space for seasonal wine tasting and occasional private events, such as weddings, business meetings, and photoshoots. The applicants plan to have the wine tasting room open to the public on a seasonal basis, Thursday – Sunday from 12PM to 8PM, with private events being booked periodically throughout the season. The applicant was unsure of the anticipated number of visitors for general wine Figure 2 Concept plan Page 3 of 8 tasting, but indicated that private events, such as weddings, may host up to 100 or more people at a time. The business is currently comprised of the two applicants. They do not expect to expand their number of employees right away but are considering hiring two additional employees sometime in the future. The applicants do not plan to have food prepared on site. Pre-packaged food will be available for daily wine tasting operations, while private events will have third-party vendors cater food. Agribusiness Under the current standards in the city code, this type of request would be processed as an Event Center Interim Use Permit (IUP). A home occupation for this concept would not be applicable, as that would restrict the possibility of any employees or independent contractors from working on the site. An event center would allow the applicants to hire additional employees or hire independent contractors, such as private vendors, to operate on the site. The request could be processed under the Event Center IUP standards, but staff does not believe this is the most appropriate method. Private events are only a portion of the applicant’s concept. Staff believes the requested use would align more with an agribusiness model than an event center. Agribusinesses are not currently called out within the City Code, but Council may consider exploring the adoption of agribusiness standards. This would give the applicant, as well as other agricultural-based businesses, more flexibility to operate within a set of standards while encouraging businesses that celebrate Corcoran’s agricultural roots. • The Council may wish to provide feedback on whether they would be supportive of establishing a set of standards for agribusiness uses in Corcoran. Buildings/Architecture The applicant plans to make a few alterations to the larger pole barn (referred to as “Barn 1” throughout this report). The alterations to barn 1 include a 768 sq ft addition to the east side of the barn for wine processing, a 471 sq ft patio on the rear side, and an 80 sq ft porch toward the front of the lot. These additions would result in a total accessory structure footprint of roughly 4292 sq ft. The cumulative accessory structure footprint of all existing detached structures on the east parcel is roughly 2975 sq. ft. The eastern parcel is 5.84 acres, which has an allowed accessory structure footprint of 2688 sq. ft. The existing accessory structures do not comply with the size standards in Section 1030.020 Subd. 4(E). Combining this parcel with the 1.92-acre parcel to the west would increase the allowed accessory structure footprint to 3313 sq ft. The applicants proposed expansion would not meet the allowed footprint before or after lot consolidation. The applicant will need to revise their site plan to comply with the allowed footprint for the parcel. Page 4 of 8 Based on the permit history and historic photos of the site, it appears that the previous owners constructed barn 1 in a location that did not match the approved location in the 2015 building permit. The approved location of the barn is north of the residential structure and is setback from the north property line ~135 ft. This is considered a nonconforming structure and does not have the same protections as a legal nonconforming structure. The rendering also shows potential wall signs on the south face of the pole barn. If processed as an event center, the Council may consider approval of a wall sign through an IUP. Otherwise, no wall signs are allowed in the RR district, per Section 84.05 Subd. 1. The applicant has not provided any architectural details for the proposed additions to Barn 1. Based on permit history, the existing building has a sidewall height of 14 ft. This does not comply with the maximum sidewall height of 13 ft. 6 in. Section 1030.020 Subd. 5(C) allows accessory structures to exceed this height limit through a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). There is not a CUP on file for Barn 1. An after-the-fact CUP would need to be acquired for this barn, due to the floodplain elevation, this may be difficult to obtain. This is explained further in the shoreland overlay district section of this report. Any addition to this structure must comply with accessory structure building standards detailed in Section 1060.050 Subd. 1(B) and Subd. 1(D). The permit history for Barn 1 indicates a wall material of colored steel panels. Section 1060.020 Subd. 1(D.3) allows accessory structures to be constructed with metal siding via a certificate of compliance, so long as it has been treated with a factory applied color coating system against degradation and meets the standards of the Minnesota Building Code. The applicant has not provided details on the materials used for the addition, but based on the renderings, it appears the expanded areas will match the existing materials. The applicant will be responsible for obtaining a certificate of compliance for this addition. Setbacks The pole barn would be required to meet the minimum accessory structure setbacks for the RR district shown in the table below: Figure 3 Building Rendering looking NW Page 5 of 8 Minimum Accessory Structure Setbacks Required Proposed for Barn 1 Front 100 feet 96.39 feet Side 20 feet 90.6 feet Rear 15 feet 220 feet Ordinary High-Water Level 100 feet ~43 feet The existing front yard setback for Barn 1 is 103.4 ft. The concept plan includes a new porch on the front of the pole barn, which would reduce this setback to roughly 96 ft. This addition would not comply with the zoning standards, the applicant would either need to reduce the porch size or relocate to a different face of the building. The building would meet all other required setbacks for the RR district after expansion. Additionally, the barn is currently located within the required setback from the Ordinary High-Water Level (OHW). After proposed expansions, the barn would only be setback 43 feet from the OHW, where a minimum setback of 100 feet is required. Parking and Drive Aisles This concept plan includes an off-street parking lot with 9 stalls in the front yard of the property, with an alternate option of a 14-stall lot. The number of parking spaces required will depend on the size of events being held on the property. The IUP standards for event centers in the RR district requires 1 parking stall per 2 guests. The applicant’s narrative suggests that private events expect to host up to 100 people. In order to accommodate events of this size, the parking lot will need to have at least 50 parking stalls. Otherwise, the maximum capacity of private events is limited to either 18 or 28 guests, depending on the size of the parking lot. If the Council determines that an Agribusiness Ordinance is more suitable for an application such as this, the minimum number of parking stalls could be readdressed. • Council may wish to provide feedback on what they believe is an appropriate amount of required parking spaces for the wine tasting room and private events. The dimensions of the nine stalls appear to comply with the minimum dimensional requirements for 90-degree parking stalls (9 ft width, 18.5 ft depth), but the drive aisle does not. For 90-degree parking, the drive aisle must have a minimum width of 26 ft. The applicant is only showing a width of 20 ft. The applicant will need to revise the drive aisle width prior to the formal application. Page 6 of 8 The concept plan for the proposed parking lot indicated that it will be a gravel lot. Under the IUP standards for an event center, off street parking must be on an improved surface such as class 5 gravel or pavement. The applicant would need to specify the type of gravel being used in this lot when submitting their formal application. Section 1060.060 Subd. 4 (A) requires parking lots to meet the following setbacks: Minimum Parking Lot Setbacks Required Proposed Front 100 feet 50 feet Side & Rear 10 feet > 10 feet Ordinary High Water Level 100 feet ~27 feet This concept would not comply with the minimum front setback, as the setback from major roads is 100 ft. The applicant would either need to relocate the lot or apply for a variance from this standard. Additionally, it would not meet the required setback of 100 feet from the ordinary high-water level (OWH). • Council may wish to provide feedback on whether they would support a variance to allow the applicant to install a parking lot within the required setback area. Access Access to the site will come from the existing driveway on the property. The concept plan depicts the parking lot connecting to the existing driveway. The applicant will need to confirm with the County that the current access location is appropriate for the proposed use. Additionally, Public Safety will require the existing driveway to be widened to at least 20 ft and be able to pass a roll test for emergency vehicles to access the site. Due to the amount of fatal and near-fatal accidents in the vicinity, a traffic study will need to be conducted to assess the increased traffic levels. Utilities The property is located outside of the MUSA boundary and is currently served by a private septic and well system. The applicant did not specify whether the accessory structure would be connected to a septic system, or if portable restroom facilities would be located on site. The applicant will be responsible for obtaining approval from Hennepin County for any septic connection on the property. Stormwater Page 7 of 8 The applicant is creating new impervious surfaces through a new parking lot and additions to the existing building. The current plan appears to disturb less than 1 acre of land and would not necessitate stormwater improvements. If the disturbance area is modified and exceeds 1 acre of land, the applicant will be required to submit a stormwater management plan in accordance with city standards at the time of a formal application. Shoreland Overlay Due to Rush Creek intersecting the property, a significant portion of both parcels lay within the Shoreland Overlay District, including the entirety of the proposed additions of the concept plan. The proposed concept must consider the standards of the Shoreland Overlay District in addition to the RR district standards. The maximum height of all structures in residential areas of the shoreland overlay district is 25 ft. The height of the existing structure is roughly 20 feet. The minimum structural setback from tributary rivers/streams in the shoreland overlay district is 100 ft. The existing structure is ~43 ft from the Ordinary High-Water Level (OHW), which was measured from the west bank of Rush Creek. The addition on the west side of the structure and the porch do not encroach further into the setback from the OHW, but the patio addition does. The shoreland overlay district requires a variance for any addition that deviates from the setback requirements of this section. The design criteria for the shoreland overlay district requires the first floor all structures without a basement, including accessory structures and additions to structures, to be constructed at least 2 feet above the regional flood elevation. The regional flood elevation in this area is 975 ft. The proposed expansions would be constructed at elevations ranging from 975.1 ft to 975.5 ft. This is too close to the floodplain elevation and the City cannot permit the proposed additions. Additionally, the parking lot is also shown within the floodplain. Permitting these expansions will require a significant amount of regulatory permitting and requirements. Engineering recommends modifications to the parking and building expansions to avoid floodplain permitting. Public Safety Figure 4 Shoreland Overlay District area Page 8 of 8 The Public Safety Committee reviewed the plans and provided the attached letter regarding access and fire code issues. Summary The applicant will need to make some significant adjustments to the concept plan if they wish to comply with the current standards of the City Code. The proposed use may be processed as an event center IUP, but it may be more appropriate to process this use as an agribusiness. Establishing a set of standards for agribusinesses would require an amendment to the zoning ordinance. Does the Council prefer this application to be reviewed under the standards of the Event Center IUP or through an Agribusiness Ordinance? 4. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss the sketch plan and provide the applicant with informal comments. Any opinions or comment provided to the applicant by the City Council are considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. Attachments: 1. Site Location Map 2. Applicant’s Narrative received July 30, 2024 3. Concept Site Plan received September 5, 2024 4. Example Renderings received April 16, 2024 5. City Engineer memo dated September 18, 2024 6. Public Safety Memo dated August 7, 2024 7. 2040 Land Use Plan Hennepin County Property Map Date: 9/19/2024 Comments:PARCEL ID: 0811923230017 OWNER NAME: J Fernandez & M Fernandez PARCEL ADDRESS: 23020 Co Rd No 30,Corcoran MN 55374 PARCEL AREA: 5.84 acres, 254,426 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: $412,900 SALE DATE: 05/2019 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed ASSESSED 2023, PAYABLE 2024 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $541,200 TAX TOTAL: $4,733.66 ASSESSED 2024, PAYABLE 2025 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $535,200 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2024 1:2,400 Attachment 7f1. Attachment 7f2. County Road No. 30 # 42379 LICENSE NO. Thomas M. Bloom DATE: DATE DRAFTED: CLIENT NAME / JOB ADDRESS SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER SHEET 1 OF 2 S1 PROPOSED SURVEY JULY 25, 2024 JULY 12, 2024 Phone (952) 474-7964 Web: www.advsur.com Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE 240941 JR JULY 25, 2024 DRAWING NUMBER DATE SURVEYED: 40200 SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 SCALE - 1" = 20' LEGAL DESCRIPTION EAST PARCEL: The East 693.56 feet of Lot 8, Block 2, OAK HOLLOW, Hennepin County, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION WEST PARCEL: That part of Lot 8, Block 2, OAK HOLLOW, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying West of the East 693.56 feet, thereof. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. 5. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. 6. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. 7. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. 8. While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiar with your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "●" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted.JOHN & MARGARET FERNANDEZ 23020 CO. RD. #30 & PID #0211923230018 CORCORAN, MN 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard, Suite 401 Deephaven, Minnesota 55391 EXISTING HARDCOVER EAST PROP. House 1,733 Sq. Ft. Existing Deck 94 Sq. Ft. Gravel Driveway 2,144 Sq. Ft. Pole Barns 1,623 Sq. Ft. Concrete Surfaces 1,597 Sq. Ft. Sheds 1,354 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 8,545 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 261,361 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 3.3% LEGEND EXISTING HARDCOVER WEST PROP. 0 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 0 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 83,502 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 0% PROPOSED HARDCOVER EAST PROP. House 1,733 Sq. Ft. Existing Deck 94 Sq. Ft. Gravel Driveway 2,144 Sq. Ft. Pole Barns 1,623 Sq. Ft. Concrete Surfaces 1,597 Sq. Ft. Sheds 1,354 Sq. Ft. Pole Barn Addition 768 Sq. Ft. Proposed Patio 472 Sq. Ft. Proposed Porch 80 Sq. Ft. Proposed Gravel Parking 3,687 Sq. Ft. TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 13,552 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 261,361 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 5.2% PROPOSED HARDCOVER WEST PROP. 0 Sq. Ft. TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 0 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 83,502 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 0% Attachment 7f3. County Road No. 30 Ru s h C r e e k B l v d . # LICENSE NO. DATE S2 JULY 25, 2024Phone (952) 474-7964 Web: www.advsur.com Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. CLIENT NAME / JOB ADDRESS SHEET TITLE PROPOSED SURVEYSHEET NO. SHEET 2 OF 2 DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE 80400 240941 JR DRAWING NUMBER DATE DRAFTED: DATE SURVEYED:JULY 12, 2024 JULY 25, 2024# 42379 Thomas M. Bloom SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 SCALE - 1" = 40' 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard, Suite 401 Deephaven, Minnesota 55391 LEGEND 23020 CO. RD. #30 & PID #0211923230018 CORCORAN, MN JOHN & MARGARET FERNANDEZ LEGAL DESCRIPTION EAST PARCEL: The East 693.56 feet of Lot 8, Block 2, OAK HOLLOW, Hennepin County, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION WEST PARCEL: That part of Lot 8, Block 2, OAK HOLLOW, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying West of the East 693.56 feet, thereof. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4.This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. 5.Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. 6.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. 7.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "●" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. Attachment 7f4. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: M&J Winery Concept Review Date: August 22, 2024 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following document: 1. Proposed Survey Sheets 1 and 2; July 25, 2024 by Advance Surveying and Engineering. Comments: General: 1. The site is proposed to be used for a wine tasting room available to the public. The site plan identifies a newly constructed parking lot for 9 stalls and 14 alternate stalls with gravel parking lot. 2. There are several buildings/structures that appear to currently encroach into easements. An encroachment agreement should be obtained for these structures if not already approved by the City for their location. Transportation 1. The proposed project access’ is from County Road 30. The applicant shall confirm with the county, that the current access location is appropriate for the proposed use. 2. The internal access and parking lot will be privately owned and maintained. 3. The Alternate Parking stalls need an access road shown. 4. The parking lot shall have concrete curbing or edging and shall have a paved surface. This shall include the alternative parking area if constructed. 5. The drive aisle should be 26-feet wide per City code. 6. Public Safety should review and comment on the size and layout of the internal drive aisles. If changes are necessary to the drive location or width, the culvert and ditch work to modify the driveway may require a permit from Hennepin County. Wetlands/Stormwater 1. Based on the current site plan, the size of the disturbance is anticipated to be less than 1-acre so it is not anticipated to trigger any City of Corcoran, Watershed or MPCA stormwater improvements. If the disturbance area changes or the site disturbance is enough to trigger stormwater treatment compliance, the applicant shall be required to meet those standards. 2. A delineated wetland is shown on the north property line and southwest corner adjacent to Rush Creek. Any improvements shall meet all applicable City and WCA regulations. Wetland buffer and setbacks shall be shown. 3. Easements shall be provided over the wetlands and buffers. 4. All drainage swales shall maintain a minimum of 2% slope and all slopes should be 4:1 or flatter unless approved by the City Engineer. Attachment 7f5. August 2024 M&J Wine Tasting Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 Floodplain and OHW 1. FEMA 100-year floodplain (Zone AE) is mapped on the property at elevations ranging from 975 to 973. This shall be shown and setbacks and freeboard would apply. 2. A FEMA mapped floodway is mapped on the property and shall be shown on the site plan. 3. The current site plan shows expanding of the existing building which likely appears to be too close to the floodplain as allowed by City and Watershed regulations. This will limit permitting expansion of the existing structure. 4. The proposed parking lot appears to be shown in the floodplain. 5. The current site plan shows improvements to the building and parking lot within the FEMA floodplain and mapped floodplain. Attempting to permit these improvements will require a significant amount of regulatory permitting and requirements and some or all of what is being proposed may not be allowable through that process. We recommend the applicant consider modifications to the location of parking and building expansions to avoid floodplain permitting. 6. DNR uses the Ordinary High Water (OHW) for determining Shoreland Overlay District setback. This elevation is different than the 100-year floodplain elevation and City can assist with determining this elevation at Applicant’s request. Water/Sewer 1. The proposed site is not within the MUSA and will be served by private well and septic system. 2. The applicant shall confirm if the current septic system can be utilized for this use or if a new septic system will be necessary. 3. The applicant shall confirm if the current well can be utilized for this use or if a new well will be necessary for the site. End of Comments Page 1 of 1 MEMO Date: August 7, 2024 To: Planning (Community Development Director Davis McKeown and Planner Klingbeil) From: Lieutenant Burns Re: City File 24-030 M&J Wine Tasting Room Concept Plan A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on August 7, 2024, to review the submitted application for the M&J Wine Tasting Room Concept Plan. In attendance were the following: Police Chief Gottschalk, Lieutenant Burns, Building Official Rosenau, Construction Services Supervisor Prichard, Planner Klingbeil, and Community Development Director Davis McKeown. Absent was Fire Chief Malewicki. The comments below are based on the preliminary review of the concept plan and are intended as initial feedback. Further plan review will need to be completed as construction plans are finalized. 1.A traffic study is recommended due to existing concerns regarding CR-30 and the number of fatal and near fatal crashes on this roadway. 2.Driveway must be widened as part of this project to at least 20’ to accommodate emergency access and two-way traffic. 3.Driveway and parking lot must pass the roll test for emergency vehicles as part of this project. 4.There may be accessibility requirements as part of the building code that need to be incorporated in the final design. 5.South edge of the parking lot must be signed “no parking fire lane”. 6.As proposed, the access to the site and gravel parking lot should suffice for the size of building proposed, but any additional intensity of seating space/events will likely trigger additional improvements. 7.There will be additional liquor licensure requirements for the premise. This may include fencing and defining continuous consumption areas. 8.A turn radius exhibit must be provided for the parking lot. Attachment 7f6. Ci t y o f G r e e n f i e l d City of Maple Grove City of Medina City of Rogers Be c h t o l d R d Pion e e r T r l Trail Haven Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 1 6 County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 10 Horseshoe Trl C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Wi l l o w D r Hunter Rd Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Homestead Trl Ca i n R d Ro l l i n g H i l l s R d Country Rd Mo h a w k D r Larkin Rd Fo x l i n e D r Strehler Rd Dassel Ln Old S e t tl e r s Rd Stieg R d Ka l k R d Meister Rd Ma p l e H i l l R d 93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Bl u e B o n n e t D r Jubert Ln 456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Br o c k t o n L n N 109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h C reek RushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthFor k R u shCr eek 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 5/27/2029 1/22/2023 1/22/2023 5/27/2029 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 5/27/2029 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: \\MSPFSV02\DesignDepot\Library\Software\GIS\Client\City of Corcoran\City wide maps\2040 Future Land Use.mxdDate: 10/27/2021 Time: 9:57:35 AM User: LPSRemote Rural/Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public Parks/Open Space Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open Water Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) Attachment 7f7. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 9a. Council Meeting January 11, 2024 Prepared By Jay Tobin Topic North Hennepin Pioneer Society Request for Funds in 2025 Action Required Direction Summary The North Hennepin Pioneer Society submitted a letter to the City in June 2024 requesting financial assistance for their organization. The letter requested immediate support for repairs to the bell tower and support for three repair projects in 2025, the letter and repair estimates are attached to this report. Per Minnesota Statute 138.053, any historical society affiliated and approved by the Minnesota Historical Society may receive funding annually from a governing body of any home rule charter or statutory city of town through specific funding options. The funding must be paid directly to the historical society of its respective city, town or county and be used for the promotion of historical work and aid in defraying the expense of carrying on the historical work in the city, town, or county. The historical society must be affiliated with and approved by the Minnesota Historical Society. City Council has approved use of gambling funds which the City receives three times to assist with maintenance of the Burschville School: •August 11, 2016 – Resolution 2016-63 approved $6,000 for repairs and paint •February 8, 2024 – Resolution 2024-09 approved $15,000 for floor repairs •July 11, 2024 – Resolution 2024-79 approved $15,000 for bell tower repairs The 2025 repair project requests are: •$44,160 – Main School Building Roof Repairs •$5,660 – Cabin roof repairs and shed removal •$22,100 – School house chimney replacement At the time the gambling ordinance was adopted, Council did not adopt a resolution specifying the use of those funds. The chart of lawful uses for gambling expenditures is attached. It is requested the City Council consider the request and direct staff on further action. Financial/Budget The gambling fund received $29,306.63 in 2023 and earned $11,155.62 in interest for a total 2023 gambling fund revenues of $40,462.25. Current gambling fund balance is $258,323.74 as of September 18, 2024. Page 2 Options 1.Discuss alternatives and commit to fund North Hennepin Pioneer Society projects in2025.2.Take no action.3.Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation Staff recommends financial support to the North Hennepin Pioneer Society in 2025 equivalent or greater than the $30,000 committed in 2024. Staff feels that clearer guidance for distribution of gambling funds would be beneficial at some point. Council Action Consider a motion to direct staff to draft documents necessary to commit funds towards the North Hennepin Pioneer Society. Attachments 1.North Hennepin Pioneer Society Request 6-5-20242.Schoolhouse Roof Quote #21703.Cabin Roof Quote #21714.Chimney Quote5.Lawful Charitable Gambling Expenditures North Hennepin Pioneer Society-Burschville School Physical Address: 22995 County Rd 10, Corcoran MN 55374 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 391, Hanover, MN 55341 Go to: www.corcoranmn.gov (choose: Community/Events/NHPS CorcoranSchool1894@gmail.com OR Web site: https://sites.google.com/view/.burschvilleschool NHPS is a 501 © (3) non-profit organization City of Corcoran June 3, 2024 8200 County Rd 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Dear Corcoran City Council, I am writing on behalf of the North Hennepin Pioneer Society. We are an organization that has maintained and cared for the Burschville School, District #107 since the society was founded in 1967. For over 55 years we have preserved and watched over the school and would hate to see it poor condition. Our school was one of the last operating schools in Hennepin County until it consolidated with the Buffalo School District in 1967. The then empty school was sold to our historical society to resupply with school items and reopen its doors to visitors. At one time there were a total of 8 one-room schools in Corcoran. At present time there are 3 used as private homes, 4 destroyed and only the Burschville School still standing and open as a one-room school of bygone years. The School is a 501©3 organization and we were accepted into the National Register of Historic Sites with the Minnesota Historical Society in 2018. It was a 4-year process, but we were able to qualify and be accepted. Over the years we have raised money for insurance, electricity, yard maintenance, repair, and replacement of damaged exterior wood, repainting the interior and exterior of the school. We have kept watch on maintenance issues that would need to be addressed in the future. Prior to the St. John’s 2nd grade class visiting last May, the foundation repair, sanding and varnishing of the wood floor was completed. The class visited, dressed in time period clothing and enjoyed traveling back in time, at Burschville The bell tower, chimney and roof would need work next, but we didn’t anticipate it happening so soon. After completing the wood floor, we found water directly beneath the bell tower on our new floor. Straight line rain blew into the tower and appeared on the floor. The rest of the attic was dry and in good condition. So, repair of the tower became urgent, and we started acquiring quotes for repair. We also acquired quotes for the roof and chimney work for the future. We have continued to raise money at our annual Summerfest in August, but we feel we need to come forth again and ask for your help by using the gambling funds the City has received. We want to fix and secure the bell tower as soon as possible. We have reached out to other organizations, supporters and members of our society for help to move forward with this work. Predicting how much we can raise is difficult, but we know if extra is collected it will go toward the roof in 2025. We acquired 3 quotes for the work and found we can work with Verdich Construction for a cost of $20,000. We can meet the 25% deposit but are looking for help from you for the remainder of the $15,000. The owner of the company Attachment: 9a1 North Hennepin Pioneer Society-Burschville School Physical Address: 22995 County Rd 10, Corcoran MN 55374 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 391, Hanover, MN 55341 Go to: www.corcoranmn.gov (choose: Community/Events/NHPS CorcoranSchool1894@gmail.com OR Web site: https://sites.google.com/view/.burschvilleschool NHPS is a 501 © (3) non-profit organization entered the bell tower area and observed the water damage and rotting wood. Fixing the problem and not just a cosmetic fix will keep it a strong tower and secure for the elements. Our second request is to be on the budget for 2025. We know the roof is an even bigger cost to us and really needs your help. We received quotes from $40,000-$48,000. Unbelievable, but attainable with the support of the City and the Community. The last roofing job was done on the school in 1996 for about $7.000 and installed by society members and a small crew. The wood cedar shakes are becoming loose and curling. So far, the interior is dry and sealed, but know we will need to replace it and we are holding out as long as we can. The chimney has numerous cracked bricks and spalling faces, but we will look into this work last on the list. We want to keep the school open and available to the citizens of Corcoran and the surrounding areas. Please assist us in doing just that. Thank you. Sincerely, Bonnie Maue, President Dale Pomerleau, Vice-President Deb Weinand-Secretary Dee Cain-Treasurer Document ID: AE303ACA-89F3-436E-9380-4F1BD8A0E0DE Page 1 of 1 Pudas Construction 864 78TH ST VICTORIA, MN 55386 (612) 481-3053 Bonnie Maue 22995 CR-10 Corcoran, MN 55374 E S T I M A T E S P E C I A L I N S T R U C T I O N S Please send your check deposit to our office address 864 78th St Victoria, MN 55386. If you would like to pay with a debit or credit card, call Maria (763)302-9680. There is a small fee if you would like to pay with a credit card. Let us know if you have any questions! Estimate #2170 Date 6/4/2024 Item Description Qty Cost Price Amount Existing Shingles Remove and dispose of main school building and 2 out houses. 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Ice and Water Guard Install ice and water guard to meet or exceed code minimum requirements. 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Synthetic Underlayment to remaining roof surface area.1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Roof Vents Remove and replace roof vents, color match. 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cedar Shingles Install machine cut 16" blue label cedar shingles. Include hip and ridge cap shake. 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total 1.00 $0.00 $44,160.00 $44,160.00 Sub Total $44,160.00 Total $44,160.00 Attachment: 9a2 Document ID: C1E48B18-1D82-4894-93FB-99AC43E1D51D Page 1 of 1 Pudas Construction 864 78TH ST VICTORIA, MN 55386 (612) 481-3053 Bonnie Maue 22995 CR-10 Corcoran, MN 55374 E S T I M A T E S P E C I A L I N S T R U C T I O N S Please send your check deposit to our office address 864 78th St Victoria, MN 55386. If you would like to pay with a debit or credit card, call Maria (763)302-9680. There is a small fee if you would like to pay with a credit card. Let us know if you have any questions! Estimate #2171 Date 6/4/2024 Item Description Qty Cost Price Amount Existing Shingles Remove and dispose of rear shed.1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Ice and Water Guard Install ice and water guard to meet or exceed code minimum requirements. 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Synthetic Underlayment to remaining roof surface area.1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cedar Shingles Install machine cut 16" blue label cedar shingles. Include hip and ridge cap shake. 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total 1.00 $0.00 $5,660.00 $5,660.00 Sub Total $5,660.00 Total $5,660.00 Attachment: 9a3 Attachment: 9a4 Lawful Purpose Expenditures Code Summary This one-page chart lists the lawful purpose expenditures that are allowed, and the codes to use when reporting these expenditures. Refer to the code information for restrictions not noted in this chart. CODE CODE CODE 1 To and by 501(c)(3) organizations or 501(c)(4) festival organizations. 11 To and by a nonprofit organiza- tion which is a church or a body of communicants. 18 Fees paid to the state for organi- zation license, premises permits, and gambling manager license. 2 Relieving the effects of poverty, homelessness, or disability. 12 Water quality testing for public waters, provided that the MPCA has approved the project. 19 Recognizing humanitarian ser- vice demonstrated through volunteerism or philanthropy. 3 Program for education, preven- tion, or treatment of problem gambling. 13 - Wildlife management project that benefits the public-at-large, provided that the DNR has approved the project. -Costs related to grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all- terrain vehicle trails that are grant-in-aid trails, or other trails open to public use, provided that DNR has approved the project. -Supplies and materials for safety training and education programs coordinated by the DNR. 20 Contribution to another licensed organization, with Board approval. 4 Funding a public or private non- profit education institution registered with or accredited by Minnesota or any other state. 21 Contribution to a parent organi- zation that has received prior Board approval. Real Property/Capital Assets 5 Scholarships. 22 Repair, maintenance, or improvement of owned real property and capital assets, or replacement of owned capital asset that is no longer repair- able, subject to annual limit. 6 - Recognition of military service (open to the public). -Active military personnel in need. 7 Activities and facilities benefiting youth under age 21. 14 Conducting nutritional pro- grams, food shelves, and con- gregate dining programs primar- ily for persons who are age 62 or older or disabled. 23 Acquisition or improvement of capital assets (excluding real property) used exclusively for lawful purpose, with a cost greater than $2,000, with Board approval. 8 Payment of local, state, and federal taxes on receipts from lawful gambling. 15 To community arts organizations or expenditures to fund arts pro- grams in the community. 9 Real estate taxes and assessments on gambling premises: -owned by a licensed organization (includes veterans organizations), or -wholly leased by a licensed 501(c)(19) veterans organization. 16 Utility costs (fuel for heating, water, electricity, and sewer costs) for building wholly owned or wholly leased by licensed veteran or fraternal organizations and used as their primary headquarters (if portion leased out, percent- age for primary headquarters allowed with GCB Director approval). 24 Acquisition, erection, improve- ment, or expansion of real property used exclusively for lawful purpose, with Board approval. 25 Erection or acquisition of com- parable building to replace building destroyed or made un- inhabitable due to fire or catas- trophe, or taken or sold under eminent domain proceeding, with Board approval. 10 - Contributions to the United States, state of Minnesota, or any of its subdivisions or agencies or instrumentalities (except a direct contribution to a law enforce- ment or prosecutorial agency). -A fund administered and regulated by a city or county (for lawful purposes). 17 Meals and other membership events of licensed veterans organizations, limited to mem- bers and spouses only, held in recognition of military service (limit $5,000 per year for all organizations at post home). 26 Contribution to non-licensed 501(c)(19) organization that is not affiliated with contributing organization and whose owned or leased property is not a per- mitted premises. Attachment: 9a5 Page 1 of 4 Agenda Item 10a. MEMO Meeting Date: September 26, 2024 To: City Council From: Dwight Klingbeil Re: Planning Project Update Projects/comments in blue italics are new. The following is a status summary of active planning projects: 1. Kwik Trip CUP, Lot Line Adjustment, and Site Plan (PID 12-119-23-14-0006; 12-119- 23-14- 0004) (City File 23-006) Kwik Trip Inc. submitted a Site Plan, Lot Line Adjustment and CUP application for the two parcels north of Mama G’s in early 2023. A feasibility study was required to evaluate the infrastructure needs of the project. The feasibility study has been distributed to the applicant. Staff and the applicant team continue to work through requirements for the application to move forward. The application is still incomplete, and the item is not currently scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 2. Commercial and Industrial Development Standards (Citywide) (City File 23-023) The purpose of this zoning ordinance amendment is to address and evaluate the allowed uses and use specific standards within commercial and industrial developments. The Council adopted a work plan at the November 20, 2023, regular meeting, and requested the Planning Commission to provide their initial feedback. The Planning Commission discussed this item at the December 5, 2023, meeting and expressed their desire Commercial and Industrial Development Standards address a number of items such as: specific architectural standards, infrastructure investment incentives, encouragement toward sustainable development practices, proper transitions of intensities and height, the permitted and conditional uses of each zoning type, verbiage, and lighting standards. City Staff prepared a survey for current landowners and lessees to express their opinions on items addressed with this update. Staff mailed the online survey invitation to property owners and tenants whose property is either currently zoned, or guided for Page 2 of 4 Commercial, Industrial, or Mixed-Use. The comment period for this survey closed on January 31, 2024. During the February 8, 2024, City Council meeting, Council directed staff to prioritize Rural Commercial (CR) and Transitional Rural Commercial (TCR) district updates for approval by the end of quarter 2. Staff presented feedback from the Planning Commission and results from the Business Community Survey to the City Council at the April 25, 2024, regular Council meeting for further direction. The City Council and Planning Commission discussed the Commercial and Industrial standards during the May 21, 2024, Joint Work Session. A survey invitation for feedback on Rural Commercial Subdivisions was posted to the City’s media pages and mailed out to properties within 500 feet of CR & TCR parcels. Council discussed the results of this survey during the June 27, 2024, meeting. A public hearing for an ordinance amendment removing self -storage/mini-storage from the CR and I-1 districts was held at the July 2, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. After some discussion, the Planning Commission motioned to recommend approval of this ordinance amendment. Council approved the zoning ordinance amendment, removing self-storage/mini-storage from the CR & I-1 districts at the July 25, 2024, meeting. A public hearing to clarify the use of development rights for subdivision in the UR, RR, CR, and TCR districts wa s held at the August 1, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission motioned unanimously to recommend approval of the draft ordinance. Council approved the Zoning Ordinance Amendment at the August 22, 2024, meeting. 3. 3019 Addition Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat (PID 07-119-23-14-0003) (City File 23-027) Craig Scherber & Associates LLC applied for a Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a Rural Residential and Rural Commercial Development on the property at PID 07 -119-23-14-0003. The application includes 15 commercial lots and 4 single-family residential lots. The applicant received Council feedback on a concept version of this proposal at the February 8, 2024, meeting. A feasibility study has been completed to evaluate the infrastructure needs of the project. This item is complete for City review and the public hearing has been scheduled for the October 3, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. 4. Pioneer Trail Industrial Park Final Plat & Final PUD (PID 32-119-23-43-0005, 32- 119-23-43-0006, 32-119-23-43-0013)(City File 23-030). Contour Development LLC applied for a Final Plat and a Final PUD at 6210 Pioneer Trail. The application consists of 0 lots and 3 outlots. This application is incomplete for City review and is not currently scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 5. 610 Extension Business Park Concept Plan (PID 12-119-23-23-0001) (City File 24-003). United Properties submitted a Concept Plan application to develop a business park at the Oswald Farm, located at 19510 County Road 30. The narrative provided by the applicant describes the proposed business park to range from 864,000 - 1,017,500 sq ft on the 76.89-acre parcel. The applicant submitted revised plans which indicate two 128,000 sq ft buildings, and two 168,000 sq ft buildings. The applicant received informal feedback from the Council during the May 21, 2024, City Council meeting. A work session for this item has been scheduled for September 26, 2024. 6. Tonka Auto CUP (PID 26-119-23-12-0004) (City File 24-008). Jake Hautman submitted a Conditional Use Permit application to allow the operation of Page 3 of 4 an auto repair business, Tonka Auto, at 20201 County Road 50. The application is complete for city review and is scheduled for the November 7, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. 7. Corcoran Industrial Northeast (PID 01-119-23-11-0001) (City File 24-010). Hemple Real Estate is seeking Council feedback on conceptual light industrial development at 10585 County Road 101. The plan includes 2 primary industrial buildings ranging from 200,200 to 342,000 sq ft on a 78.85-acre site. The applicant received informal feedback from the Council during the March 28, 2024, Council meeting. This item is not currently scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 8. Heitke Lot Line Adjustment (PID 28-119-23-33-0001 & 28-119-23-34-0001)(City File 24-013). Dan Heitke submitted application materials for a lot line adjustment which would allow his property at 7000 Rolling Hills Road to annex roughly 1.16 acres from Outlot A of Heitke Farm Addition. This item is incomplete for City review and is not currently scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 9. Camp Solberg (PID 08-119-23-31-0004) (City File 24-021). Aaron and Melissa Solberg submitted an application for a preliminary and final plat to create two single-family residential lots on Outlot B of Weinand Woods located at PID 08-119-23-31-0004. This item is incomplete for city review and is not currently scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 10. Kariniemi Orchards Preliminary Plat (PID 11-119-23-11-0012) (City File 24-024). Nathan Kariniemi submitted an application for a preliminary open space & preservation plat to allow for the development of 16 single-family lots at 20400 County Road 30. This item is incomplete and is not currently scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 11. Hope Meadows Final Plat, Final PUD (PID 11-119-23-11-0012) (City File 24-025). JPB Land, LLC. submitted application materials for a Final Plat and a Final Planned Unit Development for the first phase of “Hope Meadows”. For the first phase, the applicant is requesting approval of a Final Plat that would allow the development of 52 rowhome lots and 4 villa lots near the northwest corner of Hunters Ridge and County Road 116. The Planning Commission discussed the PUD Amendment during the August 1 meeting. After some discussion, the Commission motioned to recommend approval of the PUD amendment. This item has been scheduled for the September 12, 2024, Council meeting. 12. Domino’s Pizza (PID 23-119-23-43-0003, 23-119-23-43-0004) (City File 24-027). Strack Construction, Co. Inc. is seeking approval of a lot consolidation, site plan, CUP, and variance to allow the development of a Domino’s drive-thru/walk-out only store on the former site of the Corcoran Meat Locker and the 10 -50 Club. The public hearing for this item was held during the September 5, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. After some discussion, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the site plan, CUP, and variance requests. This item has been scheduled for the Septembe r 26, 2024, regular meeting. 13. Tavera 7 Final Plat, Final PUD (PID 35-119-23-24-0007) (City File 24-028). Lennar has submitted application materials for Final Plat and Final PUD for Ta vera 7th, which would develop 40 twin-homes, 60 villas, and 6 outlots. This item is complete for City review and has been scheduled for the September 26, 2024, regular meeting. 14. Slabaugh Plat (PID 10-119-23-24-0014 & 10-119-23-21-0013) (City File 24-029). Gideon Slabaugh submitted application materials for a preliminary plat, final plat, Page 4 of 4 easement vacation, and variance for the property at 9925 Ebert Road. The request would allow the applicant to annex a portion of the neighboring property, 9945 Ebert Road, and square off the two lots. The applicant also requests approval of a variance to allow these properties to replat without upgrading Ebert Road. The public hearing for this item was held during the September 5, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. The commission motioned to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and variance request. The preliminary plat, final plat, easement vacation, and variance has been scheduled for the September 26, 2024, regular meeting. 15. M&J Creekside Vineyard Concept Plan (PID 08-119-23-23-0017 & 08-119-23-23-0018) (City File 24-038). Margaret and John Fernandez are seeking Council feedback on a concept plan for a wine tasting room/private event space on their property at 23020 County Road 30. This item is complete for City review and has been scheduled for the September 26, 2024, regular meeting. 16. Upward Acres Final Plat (PID 17-119-23-13-0001) (City File 24-031). Skies Limit LLC. submitted an application for the final plat of Upward Acres, which would allow the development of 6 single -family lots at 22625 County Road 10. City Council approved the preliminary plat and variance for Upward Acres during the June 27, 2024, meeting. This item is under review for completeness and has been scheduled for the September 26, 2024, regular meeting. 17. Heather Meadows 3rd Addition Preliminary Plat/OS&P (PIDs 05-119-23-31-0001 & 088-119-23- 22-0011) (City File 24-032). Mark and Markus Lee, of ML Unlimited LLC, submitted a final plat application to create 12 single-family lots and 2 outlots at 22901 Oakdale Drive. The Council approved the Variance, CUP, and Preliminary Plat with additional conditions for Heather Meadows during the June 27, 2024, regular meeting. This item is complete for City review and has been scheduled for the September 26, 2024, regular meeting. 18. Schuttee/Streeter Rezoning Concept (PID 26-119-23-13-0006) (City File 24-033). Ken Streeter, on behalf of Phil Schuttee, is requesting council feedback on a concept plan that would rezone the property at 20130 Larkin Road from Light Industrial (I -1) to Medium Density Residential. This item is complete for City review and has been scheduled for the September 26, 2024, regular meeting. 19. Old Farm Ridge (PID 36-119-23-33-0008) (City File 24-034). Michael Kelly submitted an application for a preliminary plat, final plat, conditional use permit, and variance to plat a single lot from Outlot A of Country Season Estates, located at 6620 County Road 116. The application is under review for completeness and has not been scheduled for any upcoming meetings. Agenda Item: 11 City of Corcoran 2024 and 2025 City Council Schedule (as of September 26, 2024) Below is a tentative schedule for City Council meetings subject to change. October 10, 2024 • City Park Remaster – (JCB) • Utility Rate Study – (Kevin) October 24, 2024 • Public Safety Departmental Overview and Budget – (Matt) • Administration Departmental Overview and Budget – (Nalisha) • Compensation and Classification • Planning Project Update • Heitke Minor Subdivision (Dwight) • Camp Solberg Minor Subdivision (Dwight) • Pioneer Trail FP and FPUD (Kendra) November 12 – Charter Commission Meeting • Annual Report to Hennepin County November 14, 2024 • Community Development Department Overview and Budget – (Natalie) • Public Works Department Overview and Budget – (Kevin) • Certification of General Election 2024 • Tort Liability Coverage Waiver • Certify Delinquent Utilities to Hennepin County • Certify Delinquent Recycling to Hennepin County • Draft 2025 Fee Schedule November 25, 2024 (NOTE: Monday Meeting) December 12, 2024 • Recognition of Employee: • Matt Gottschalk – 10 years (Public Safety) • MS4 Permit • Truth and Taxation Hearing • Final 2025 Budget and Levy • 2025 Wage Schedule • 2025 Enterprise Fund Budget • 2025 CIP • 2025 Fee Schedule Adoption • Planning Project Update • Call for Work Sessions in First Quarter 2025 Agenda Item: 11 January 9, 2025 January 23, 2025 February 13, 2025 February 27, 2025 March 13, 2025 March 27, 2025 April 10, 2025 April 24, 2025 May 8, 2025 May 22, 2025 June 12, 2025 June 26, 2025 July 10, 2025 July 24, 2025 August 14, 2025 August 28, 2025 September 11, 2025 September 25, 2025 October 9, 2025 October 16, 2025 November 13, 2025 November 24, 2025* (NOTE: Monday Meeting) December 11, 2025