Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2024-02-22 Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda February 22, 2024 - 7:00 pm REVISED 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval 4. Commission Representatives* 5. Presentations/Recognitions a. REVISED: Zeke Recognition (K9 Unit) 6. Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 7. Consent Agenda a. ADDED: February 8, 2024 DRAFT Work Session Minutes* b. ADDED: February 8, 2024 DRAFT Regular Council Minutes* c. Financial Claims February 22, 2024* d. Water Tower – Pay Request 10* e. Life Cycle Replacement of Council Chamber Chairs* f. REVISED: Appoint Planning Commissioners* g. Construction Hours Update* h. Lister Garage CUP (City file 23-028)* i. Temporary Liquor Licenses-Corcoran Lions* j. ADDED: March 9, 2023 DRAFT Regular Council Minutes* k. Staff Report on K-9 Program* l. REVISED: Resolution 2024-12 Zeke K-9 Unit Recognition of Service* m. Conference Room Video/Audio Cameras* n. Water Treatment Plant – Change Order 1* o. ADDED: Lead Service Line Inventory – Engagement Request (Minnesota Department of Health)* p. Current City Organization Chart* q. ADDED: Public Works Facility Fund Closeout* 8. Planning Business – Public Comment Opportunity a. REVISED: Hope CPA, RZ, PP, PUD (City file 23-028)* b. 610 Extension* 9. Unfinished Business 10. New Business 11. Staff Reports a. Staff Report Planning Update* 12. 2024 City Council Schedule* 13. Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.corcoranmn.gov. HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Council meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 845 8754 1654 Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84587541654 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 845 8754 1654 *Please note in-person comments will be taken at the scheduled meeting where noted. Comments received via email to City Clerk Friedrich at mfriedrich@corcoranmn.gov or via public comment cards will also be accepted. All email and public comment cards must be received by the Wednesday prior to scheduled Council meeting. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov * Corcoran City Council Agenda February 22, 2024 - 7:00 pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Commission Representatives* 5.Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6.Presentations/Recognitions a.Zeke Recognition (K9 Unit) 7.Consent Agenda a.February 8, 2024 DRAFT Work Session Minutes* b.February 8, 2024 DRAFT Regular Council Minutes* c.Financial Claims February 22, 2024* d.Water Tower – Pay Request 10* e.Life Cycle Recyle Replacement of Council Chamber Chairs* f.Appoint Planning Commissioners* g.Construction Hours Update* h.Lister Garage CUP (City file 23-028)* i.Temporary Liquor Licenses-Corcoran Lions* j.March 9, 2023 DRAFT Regular Council Minutes* k.Staff Report on K-9 Program* l.Resolution 2024-12 Zeke K-9 Unite Recognition of Service* m. Conference Room Audio/Video Equipment Upgrade* n.Water Treatment Plant – Change Order 1* o.Lead Service Line Inventory – Engagement Request (Minnesota Department of Health)* p.Current City Organization Chart* 8.Planning Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Hope CPA, RZ, PP, PUD (City file 23-028)* b.610 Extension Business Park Concept * 9.Unfinished Business 10.New Business 11.Staff Reports a. Staff Report Planning Update* 12.2024 City Council Schedule* 13.Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.corcoranmn.gov. HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Council meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 845 8754 1654 Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84587541654 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 845 8754 1654 *Please note in-person comments will be taken at the scheduled meeting where noted. Comments received via email to City Clerk Friedrich at mfriedrich@corcoranmn.gov or via public comment cards will also be accepted. All email and public comment cards must be received by the Wednesday prior to scheduled Council meeting. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov * STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 4. Summary The advisory commission representatives for the February 22, 2024, Council meeting are as follows: • Planning Commission: Mark Lanterman • Parks and Trails Commission: Judy Strehler Financial/Budget N/A Council Action N/A Attachments N/A Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Topic Action Required Informational 1 CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Work Session Minutes February 8, 2024 – 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on February 8, 2024, in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City Council work session meeting was held in person and the public was present in person and remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Vehrenkamp were present. City Administrator Tobin, City Clerk Friedrich, Public Works Director Mattson, Detective Spellacy, Sergeant Ekenberg, and Administrative Services Director Hughes were present. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor McKee called the work session to order at 5:30 pm. 2.LPR Camera Discussion Detective Spellacy and Sergeant Ekenberg presented findings on LPR camera systems to Council and noted the presentation summarizes findings on ALPR (Automatic License Plate Recognition) cameras based on a six-month exploration. In 2023, the council initiated a strategic endeavor to explore the feasibility of ALPR cameras, and in 2024, Council reiterated the importance of continuing this exploration. Sergeant Eckenberg and Detective Spellacy attended numerous demonstrations and met with departments currently utilizing LPRs near the Corcoran area. The usage, benefits, drawbacks, and costs were reviewed and after thorough research, it was concluded that FLOCK appeared to be the most suitable vendor for potential ALPR cameras. Detective Spellacy and Sergeant Ekenberg noted throughout th e process, feedback was actively solicitated from community members, ensuring that any solution we pursued integrated appropriate safeguards, with a goal to avoid indiscriminate data collection and instead prioritize retention policies and robust safeguards associated with ALPR cameras. Through various demonstrations of different camera systems, we determined that FLOCK addressed our concerns most effectively. Detective Spellacy and Sergeant Ekenberg reviewed the primary objectives revolved around leveraging a network of cameras to aid in crime resolution, and to extend this capability to various neighborhoods and communities that expressed interest in utilizing ALPR technology to enhance local safety efforts. Detective Spellacy and Sergeant Ekenberg noted the focus was on developing a secure infrastructure that adhered to legal statutes while ensuring compliance with regulations. Detective Spellacy and Sergeant Ekenberg opined that proactively monitoring incoming vehicles, particularly those associated with criminal activity like stolen vehicles, th e possibility increases to preemptively thwart potential crimes. Council and staff discussed different applications for the ALPR cameras in the private sector, and how data can be shared. Staff noted the lease cost of each camera is approximately $3,000 per camera. A FLOCK representative gave a brief presentation summary of ALPR cameras. Council requested staff schedule a future meeting on April 11, 2024. Council provided staff direction on additional information Council would like to review and noted including how well the cameras detect suspect vehicles, if the platform software is available for squad cars, a cost breakdown for each camera to include poles, or other materials needed for the cameras to be operational in different circumstances, long-term hard drive storage and access to long-term data, how much of an impact on crime the cameras provide, what percentage of effort in scrubbing data is anticipated, how many lawsuits have been filed against FLOCK, legal considerations for the City, and include for review draft ALPR contracts from other police departments. 3.Unscheduled Items No unscheduled business was heard. 4.Adjournment MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp Added Agenda Item: 7a. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Minutes February 8, 2024 – 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on February 8, 2024, in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City Council meeting was held in person and the public was present in person and remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Vehrenkamp were present. City Administrator Tobin, City Clerk Friedrich, Public Works Director Mattson, and Administrative Services Director Hughes were present. City Attorney Thames was present, and City Planner Lindahl was present virtually. 1.Call to Order/Roll Call Mayor McKee called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor McKee invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Tobin noted the addition of item 7a Draft Council Meeting Meetings for January 25, 2024, and revised agenda item 9a Organics Recycling with legal review. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Bottema to approve the agenda as modified. Voting Aye: McKee, Schultz, Bottema, Vehrenkamp, and Nichols. (Motion carried 5:0) 4.Commission Representatives Mayor McKee noted Planning Commissioner Brummond was present for Commissioner Lind, and Parks and Trails Commissioner Christenson was present virtually. 5.Open Forum (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person during Open Forum for items not included on the agenda. City Administrator Tobin explained the instructions to participate in the public comment opportunity. Mark Woda, 19461 102nd Place, opined on the access to Hunters Ridge Road to the Bellwether community and opined an access entrance and exit for construction traffic should exist. Mr. Woda noted it is difficult to enjoy the Bellwether community, as a retired resident, with all the construction traffic that is occurring in the development. Mr. Woda noted the percentage of taxes paid by residents in the Bellwether community to the City of Corcoran. Mr. Woda noted his request for the City to make a goodwill gesture and open Hunter’s Ridge Road as an alternate road regardless of the obstacles. Mr. Woda thanked Council for their time. Terry Lehman, 10224 Ironwood Lane, supports a connection to Hunter’s Ridge Road from the Bellwether community. Ms. Lehman opined on the documentation from previous Council meetings regarding Hunter’s Ridge Road and referenced document number 10611827 filed with the Hennepin County Recorder. Ms. Lehman noted paragraph 10, sub paragraphs f and g, describes a feasibility study at a specific phase of the development plan from August 10, 2018. Council requested the audience in the lobby and within the Council Chambers to please quiet themselves to allow the speaker the courtesy of their time in Open Forum. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Nichols to extend Ms. Lehman’s time past the 5-minute mark. Voting Aye: McKee, Schultz, Bottema, Vehrenkamp, and Nichols. (Motion carried 5:0) Ms. Lehman opined the limited access of two roadways within Bellwether place the residents in a potentially dangerous situation in the event of a natural disaster such as flood or fire, or in the event of an Added Agenda Item: 7b. 2 evacuation due to a national emergency. Ms. Lehman thanked Council for their attention to this matter. Jason Bartels, 197500 Hunters Ridge, does not support immediate connection through Hunter’s Ridge Road, and noted there are wooden emergency barricades in the event of an emergency, and opined on exits from the community on the north and northeast sides. Council questioned where the data resource came from regarding Bellwether property taxes. Ron Lindenfelser, 19469 102nd Place, noted the data was created from information from the Bellwether newsletter. Mr. Lindenfelser noted it was recent information, and included the quantity of homes sold, in process of being sold, and total quantity of lots. Mr. Lindenfelser noted the revenue was obtained by averaging approximately $7,000 per lot in property tax revenue from the Bellwether community, with the base of 324 homes that residents are currently living in within the Bellwether Community. Mr. Lindenfelser noted property tax revenue follows two years after the actual home is built. Mr. Lindenfelser noted the numbers reflect a summary of the Bellwether community lot map that includes streets and homes. Council noted the difference in total property tax on a $400,000 home, the portion that is City tax and noted the data referenced in Open Forum is not comparing apples to apples regarding property tax and revenue totals. Council provided context from a historical perspective on Hunter’s Ridge Road. Council noted the difficulties residents experience within new developments and understands the perspective by Bellwether residents to open Hunter’s Ridge Road. Council reviewed actions by the previous Council that approved the Bellwether development, but that they would not connect existing residential streets to Bellwether until very late in the process. Council referenced current resident complaints with Bellwether and not wanting to live with construction traffic, but noted residents outside Bellwether community, didn't want to live in separate development’s construction traffic, and noted it would be an even greater imposition for them who didn't choose to buy in a new construction development, to have to go through that. Council noted the understanding of dealing with construction traffic. Council noted that current Councils need to be a good steward of the promise that was previously made to those residents and be accountable for that decision that was made. Council noted being open to looking at the specifics of the contract but clarified the City should not have to pay for things they don't need to pay for. Council clarified that the City amount of property taxes typically is about a third of what the total property tax amount is. Council noted services of providing police protection, fire protection, and parks and trails to the community through City taxes. Council thanked residents for coming to the meeting and noted residents can reach out to Council via email on the website. Larry Souther, 10226 Elm Lane, noted discussions with the Mayor and City Administrator regarding the connection at Hunter’s Ridge Road and emergency vehicle stakes, to allow emergency vehicles, but not allow construction traffic, and asked for clarification of whether that was still a viable plan or if it was being considered. Mayor McKee noted discussions with the Director of Public Safety Gottschalk and reviewed that type of emergency access does not work in this type of development as the emergency access points won’t necessarily be the same throughout all the phases of the development. Council and staff noted that currently emergency access is in place if needed on Hunter’s Ridge Road, minus the payment and curb. Council reviewed development over the past eight years, and noted eight years ago, there was only one development in the City of Corcoran. Council reviewed the progress of developments in Corcoran, and that construction traffic has impacted each development. Council noted all taxpayers in Corcoran pay a portion of City tax based on property values. Council requested patience of the residents who live in the developments from the start of the project to the finish, as all the developments are great developments in Corcoran, and work through the middle of the project development when construction traffic seems to be greater. Council also noted the predictability of developments and forthcoming construction traffic. Another resident came forward and asked to speak. Mayor McKee noted eliminating a back-and-forth dialogue between Council and residents but allowed the resident to approach the podium to speak. Chris Lehman, 10224 Ironwood Lane, requested documentation of previous Council’s action to not allow construction traffic on Hunter’s Ridge Road. Council deferred the request to Public Works Director Mattson, noting the discussion has been referenced in previous Council meetings. Mr. Lehman noted if residents in Bellwether better understood previous Council discussions, related to the contract, indicating no construction traffic. Mayor McKee noted Council would work with staff to try to locate past discussions to gain some context on 3 the discussions from past meetings. City Administrator Tobin noted staff could work with Ron to provide the data once it is located. City Administrator Tobin noted there are two seat openings on the Planning Commission and encouraged interested residents to visit the website for the Planning Commission application. Council asked the audience to remain seated while the oath of office presentation for Sergeant Dan Wilcox was completed. Another resident raised their hand and requested to speak at the podium on the Hunter’s Ridge Road discussion. Mayor McKee noted this would be the last Open Forum resident to speak on the Bellwether community and Hunter’s Ridge Road discussion. Nancy Johnson, 19453 102nd Place, opined on concern of safety issue of limited road accesses within the Bellwether community and with Stieg Road being difficult to access. Ms. Johnson noted there are possibilities of having the current road accesses blocked. Council noted there will be communications to residents regarding details on verification of emergency standards of access points to the Bellwether community. 6. Presentations/Recognitions a. Swearing in and Oath of Office – Dan Wilcox City Clerk Friedrich read the oath of office and Sergeant Wilcox repeated the oath of office with his right hand raised. Mayor McKee noted Sergeant Wilcox’ police officer work history. Council thanked him for his military service. 7. Consent Agenda a. January 25, 2024, Regular Council Minutes* b. Financial Claims February 8, 2024* c. Resolution 2024-09 Pioneer Society Lawful Gambling Donation Request d. Resolution 2024-10 Additional Election Judges in 2024 e. NE Infrastructure Improvements – HUD Grand Agreement f. Water Treatment Plant – Pay Request 9 MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Vehrenkamp to approve items 7a-f as presented. Voting Aye: McKee, Schultz, Bottema, Vehrenkamp, and Nichols. (Motion carried 5:0) 8. Planning Business (Public Comment Opportunity) a. 3019 Additional Concept Plan City Planner Lindahl presented the sketch plan for the 3019 Addition. City Planner Lindahl noted the applicant is requesting informal feedback on a sketch plan on the 66-acre parcel. City Planner Lindahl the parcel is a vacant piece of property, and the property is guided a mix of rural ag residential and rural service commercial, with the corresponding zoning rural residential and transitional rural commercial. City Planner Lindahl noted the transitional rural commercial is a holding zone like the open reserve but a holding zone until commercial development is proposed. City Planner Lindahl noted the parcel is outside of the MUSA at the corner of County Road 19 and 30, and noted the natural inventory does show some natural resources off-site. City Planner Lindahl noted the only natural resources on this site are the shoreland from the adjacent Creek. City Planner Lindahl reviewed there are several parcels in the area that are planned for rural commercial, which tend to be contractors’ yards and uses that do not require sewer and water. City Planner Lindahl noted this parcel as it exists has seven development rights and noted that there's several rural commercial properties that also have development rights shown on the development rights map. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the application includes residential lots within North South Street, and then on 15 commercial lots on the West side and requiring both a re-guiding and a rezoning to move the land use boundary between the rural residential and the commercial slightly further east, and then rezoning the property from rural residential and transitional rural commercial to rural commercial to accommodate those commercial uses. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the applicant has met several times with staff to discuss development on this parcel, and noted in October of last year, the applicant submitted a formal development application that was deemed incomplete. City Planner Lindahl noted in the last month, the city administrator met with the applicant and the applicant submitted a written request to pause the development proposal and allow a sketch plan to be reviewed with the Council. The applicant would like to talk about the development rights program and discuss a few of the concept plan comments that staff provided regarding the 4 development rights program. City Planner Lindahl noted the development rights program has been in place since the early 1980’s with a reset in the early 1990s. City Planner Lindahl noted the developments rights tool is a tool to manage density in rural areas to ensure lots are large enough to accommodate wells and septic systems. City Planner Lindahl noted staff acknowledges there are some concerns and inconsistencies between the code and the map and reviewed the code indicates that the program identifies the maximum number of residential units or non-residential units that be need may be developed. City Planner Lindahl noted the council has consistently required a development right for residential or commercial lots in the rural area and is the message relayed to the applicant when staff met with them starting in 2022, about this project and suggested that a concept plan be brought forward to the council to have this discussion. City Planner Lindahl noted the parcel has seven development rights and the applicants plan shows 19 lots which is 12 more than allowed by the code under the policy that the city has used. Next slide. City Planner Lindahl noted review by Council to weigh in on the policy of development rights and either reaffirm the historic Council direction that one development right is required for development in the rural residential urban reserve and rural commercial districts, or to modify the policy as requested by the applicant to remove the requirement for development rights in the rural commercial district. City Planner Lindahl noted modifying the policy is a change but is certainly something given the inconsistencies in the code that Council could do. Staff believes it's important to clarify that development rights in the rural residential districts remain based on acreage, meaning one development right per 10 acres. Cit Planner Lindahl noted it would be unfair to all the landowners in Corcoran to re-guide property to commercial and assign those commercial development rights to 15 acres of residential land. City Planner Lindahl noted the necessity of Council direction, to initiate a zoning ordinance amendment to clarify policy direction this evening. City Planner Lindahl noted as land starts to develop it is relevant to clean up any question about how development rights are applied. City Planner Lindahl noted the primary concern from staff is the development rights program, elimination would then only require compliance with minimum lot size, and staff believes the concept lots proposed are too small to be successful long-term. City Planner Lindahl noted the concept lots are like what is in the historic industrial district, and we know that those lots are too small for businesses to be able to expand over time, and be able to accommodate parking, septic systems, and outside storage, which are common in the rural commercial district. City Planner Lindahl noted the City has a minimum lot size in the rural commercial district, but like our minimum lot size of two acres in the rural residential, it's balanced by the fact that there's only so many development rights. City Planner Lindahl noted there are outstanding issues regarding stormwater traffic, grading, etc., and that typically, an applicant would submit a concept plan first, to trigger the feasibility study, prior to coming in with the preliminary plat application. City Planner Lindahl noted in this case the process was completed a little bit differently, and noted the feasibility study is not yet complete. City Planner Lindahl noted stormwater is a significant discussion item. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the sketch plan and requested Council provide the applicant feedback on the sketch plan, which is advisory only and it's not a binding decision. Cit Planner Lindahl reiterated the issue of development rights is the reason for the discussion tonight and is a significant policy issue. Council discussed zoning possibilities that could override the building rights program, rezoning, amending the code, and differences in light industrial and mixed use. Council discussed allowing the downtown business park to be duplicated in the rural area, and effectively means Council is deciding against preserving the rural character of Corcoran. Council noted intentionally changing policy to make it advantageous to a higher density runs counter to what Council has been trying to accomplish. Council discussed addressing rural development of commercial parcels regarding specific feedback for the applicant. Council discussed OS&Ps and building rights to the rural residential district. Council discussed expansion of commercial lots being relative to the business that has growth. Dave Leinhart, attorney for the developer, spoke briefly on the inconsistency between the building ordinance and the application of development rights against the commercial portion of the sketch plan. Mr. Lenhard referenced code section 10 70.07 clearly states the intention is to apply this to the residential areas, which is consistent with other how other parts of the zoning ordinance read. Mr. Leinhart noted code 10 70.07 references development rights map reflects the number of development rights, remaining properties, etc., and is intended to show the maximum number of residential units that may be developed per an individual parcel, with nothing referenced about an intention to impose development rights against commercial parcels. Mr. Leinhart further added ordinance 10 40.090, which is the CR rural commercial and 10 40.095, which is the TRC or transitional rural commercial, neither of ordinances do not mention the development rights map or development rights restrictions at all. Mr. Leinhart noted the ordinance reviews regular zoning 5 area requirements like minimum lot size and setbacks, but nothing that refers to imposing development rights restrictions against the two commercial areas within the sketch concept plan. Scott Dahlke, Civil Engineering Site Design, reviewed proposed sketch plan, and noted affordability of housing, and keeping costs reasonable with high quality. Mr. Dahlke disagreed with comment by City Planner Lindahl that lots within the sketch plan are too small for commercial lots. Mr. Dahlke noted 2.5 acres is a functional size with 10,000 sq ft building, with 50 percent covered by impervious surface with remainder as green space. Mr. Dahlke noted the hatched areas reference impervious surface with the remainder as green space; noted the 50 percent impervious coverage and stormwater requirements through watershed; and trying to meet all the requirements of City and county entities. Mr. Dahlke opined on the appropriate size of the commercial properties and allowing expansion for businesses by purchasing adjacent properties. Mr. Dahlke noted the larger properties are limiting due to increased costs with size of buildings on larger properties. Council questioned changing building rights or potentially increasing lot size requirements; Council noted the 10-acre minimum based on value of residential lots. Council discussed areas impacted include the Public Works area, Doboszenki’s, and D&D. City Planner Lindahl noted most commercial businesses are looking for 10-acre parcels, but Council direction is needed to clarify building rights on commercial properties. Attorney Thames noted code could be updated, with City authority to change, and clarification on what is on development rights map and commercial lot standards, to alleviate issues with interpretation. Council noted having staff review code to reflect code change within application process for a different standard. Council feedback on the sketch plan included staying within the building rights allowed and maintaining with buffer between commercial and residential. Council discussing changing the rural commercial standards and dropping development rights and requested staff review rural commercial standards and bring back to Council for review. Council provided direction to staff to maintain rural residential standards and investigate modifying rural commercial standards by the end of second quarter. 9. Unfinished Business Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person during public comment opportunity for items 9a- d. City Administrator Tobin explained the instructions to participate in the public comment opportunity. No persons participated in the public comment opportunity. a. REVISED: Organics Recycling Administrative Services Director Hughes reviewed Hennepin County Ordinance 13 regarding organics recycling per Hennepin County ordinance 13, State law, and Minnesota Pollution Control agencies recycling requirements. Administrative Services Director Hughes reviewed the city had three options to comply with the organics recycling requirements; 1) City provides an organics recycling drop off site for residents to use, 2) City could offer curbside organics recycling collection for all residents through a single provider under contract with the city, or 3) the city could require haulers to each provide curbside organics recycling to residents when requested. Administrative Services Director Hughes noted the organics recycling fee could vary from hauler to haul. Administrative Services Director Hughes summarized at the January 11 Council meeting, it was brought to staff's attention that community members had been billed by Republic for organics collection, though they did not sign up to participate. Administrative Services Director Hughes noted staff has researched this and investigated to determine what has happened and we've learned that some of Republic customers had requested the organics recycling service. Administrative Services Director Hughes noted per the ordinances stated previously, with organics recycling being offered to all the haulers waste collection customers, all customers had to be charged. This was in compliance with the City Ordinance 117 and Hennepin County Ordinance 13, which both require the service to be offered. Administrative Services Director Hughes noted currently, other licensed residential haulers have not been asked by customers to provide the organics service so they are not charging at this time; However, under this current framework, if any of the customers from another service haulers were to ask for curbside organics recycling, that hauler or that service provider would charge all customers. Administrative Services Director Hughes noted Hennepin County ordinance 13 currently offers an exemption to the curbside organics collection mandate. Administrative Services Director Hughes noted Corcoran is a fourth-class city and can set up and offer to residents an organics collection site within its boundaries or could partner with a neighboring community if this site was provided, the city need not require curbside organics collection. In this example, haulers would not be prohibited from providing curbside service, but they're not mandated to do so. Therefore, customers could select a provider that fits their individual needs based on if they need organics or not. Administrative Services Director Hughes reviewed at the Council meeting on 21 ,2023, 6 Council reviewed the option to provide a collection site and determined not to establish one. The City Council is empowered to alter this approach and seek qualifications for this exemption. Administrative Services Director Hughes noted, absent a decision to pursue the exemption, the City must nominate a single curbside provider to collect organics from all residents or continue to mandate that every hauler does so. Administrative Services Director Hughes reiterated all solid waste haulers must charge all customers for curbside organics, if this service is provided to any of its customers, based on Minnesota state statute 115 8.93 Subdivision three C, which states a licensing authority shall prohibit mixed municipal waste. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by McKee, to approve Option 1 and provide an organics bin on City property, and repeal the requirement in Chapter 117 of Code requiring haulers to offer organics recycling. City Attorney Thames clarified that the exemption allows the City the option to repeal that portion of 117 that mandates that all haulers offer organics recycling, allowing a free-market element so those providers that don't offer organics collection can still operate, even if some haulers continued to offer organics. City Attorney Thames noted a resident has the option to select a provider that doesn't offer organics recycling because they don't have that as part of their fee. City Attorney Thames noted Hennepin County Ordinance 13 and State Statute do require any hauler offering organics recycling to charge all residents the same. Voting Aye: McKee, Schultz, Bottema, Vehrenkamp, and Nichols. (Motion carried 5:0) b. Stieg Road Improvements – Approve Plans/Specs; Authorize Bids MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Nichols to approve Stieg Road improvements, authorize plans/specs, and authorize bids. Voting Aye: McKee, Schultz, Bottema, Vehrenkamp, and Nichols. (Motion carried 5:0) c. Public Works Resignation and Hiring Process Authorization MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Vehrenkamp to accept resignation by Clyde Bechtold and authorize staff to begin hiring process for two maintenance worker positions. Voting Aye: McKee, Schultz, Vehrenkamp, and Nichols Nay: Bottema (Motion carried 4:1) Councilor Bottema voted nay to accepting the resignation of Clyde Bechtold. Council thanked Mr. Bechtold for his service. d. County Road 116 Multi-Modal Trail Maintenance Discussion Council noted a previous Council resolution of support based on previous information. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Schultz to decline the opportunity based on lack of information received. Voting Aye: Nay: McKee, Schultz, Bottema, Vehrenkamp, and Nichols (Motion fails 0:5) MOTION: made by McKee, seconded by Vehrenkamp, to submit the original resolution approved on November 20, 2023, and not consider any verbiage changes to the resolution. Voting Aye: McKee, Schultz, Bottema, Vehrenkamp, and Nichols. (Motion carried 5:0) Council discussed Hennepin County partnering with Three Rivers Park to complete some higher quality underpasses as part of a single trail that transitions through open space, rather than a parallel trail next to a County Road. 10. New Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person during public comment opportunity for item 10a. City Administrator Tobin explained the instructions to participate in the public comment opportunity. No persons participated in the public comment opportunity. a. Cropland Bids/Parcel Weed Control Discussion Council discussed a charity operating in the area and throughout Minnesota, as a potentially interested party in renting a parcel, and teaching farming to minority communities. Council noted a possible property tax relief from working with charitable entity. City Administrator Tobin mentioned the timeline of 8 weeks before the actual crop season may begin and noted if the cropland bidding 7 process fails to produce bids, the City may need to review another weed control process. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Nichols to open the cropland bids for a net impact of zero to the City regarding personal property taxes on each parcel. Council discussed the bidding process, the possibility of zero bids received, and directing staff on additional options. Friendly amendment made by Bottema, to direct staff to proceed with Option 2, but if no bids are received, proceed to Option 1 or Option 3, and present to Council at the second meeting in March. Council and staff discussed different costs associated with hiring a contractor to spray or mow versus having internal staff spray or mow. City Attorney Thames clarified in theory a non-profit would trigger PILT, then effectively the non-profit would win the bid at a net zero. City Attorney Thames added a high bid wins the RFP but adding the prerequisite to being a qualified bidder is you can’t result in a contribution over zero to the City. Voting Aye: McKee, Schultz, Bottema, Vehrenkamp, and Nichols. (Motion carried 5:0) 11. Staff Reports 12. 2024 City Council Schedule Council received schedule. 13. Adjournment Council discussed a possible lawsuit forthcoming and noted a closed session with the City Attorney would be advisable in the future to review implications. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Schultz, Bottema, Vehrenkamp, and Nichols. (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:47 pm on February 8, 2024. Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk 2 Meeting adjourned at 6:38 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk (Motion carried 5:0) STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7a-b. Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Michelle Friedrich Topic Draft Work Session and Regular Council Minutes – February 8, 2024 Action Required Informational Summary The draft Council Work Session and Regular Minutes for February 8, 2024, will be emailed on Tuesday, February 20, with hard copy provided to Council the evening of the February 22 meeting. Attachments (Hard copies will be provided February 22, 2024) 1. 2024-02-08 Draft Work Session Council Minutes 2. 2024-02-08 Draft Regular Council Minutes Agenda Item 7c. Council Meeting Date:2/22/2024 Prepared By:Jodie Peterson Amount Project name $0.00 -$ $250,233.53 $250,233.53 166,420.85$ 416,654.38$ Date Paid to Amount Description 2/2/2024 ADP PAYROLL FEES 365.64$ Payoll Processing Fee 2/6/2024 THE HARTFORD 1,641.37$ Employee Disability Premium 2/7/2024 INVOICE CLOUD 1,623.86$ Credit Card Processing Fee 2/8/2024 RevTrak 596.71$ Credit Card Processing Fee 2/8/2024 ADP 130,789.68$ Net Payroll and Taxes 2/9/2024 MN PERA 25,813.78$ Employee Pension 2/12/2024 EMPOWER 5,478.37$ Employee Deferred Comp/Healthcare Savings 2/14/2024 MN DEPT OF REVEN 111.44$ Fuel Tax Total 166,420.85$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL Auto Deductions / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursements ALL OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMS Check Register (See attached Check Detail Registers) Total Checks Total of Auto Deductions Total Total Fund #500 = (See attached Payments Detail) FINANCIAL CLAIMS CHECK RANGE FUND #500 ESCROW CLAIMS Paid to SEE THE REGISTER FOR #500 CLAIMS CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 1/7Page: 02/15/2024 04:09 PM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/09/2024 - 02/22/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 35039 350397.38 02/22/245492188 FT REWIND ROPEA-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC02/08/24100-43100-50210 7.38 Total For Check 35039 Check 35040 3504021,800.04 02/22/24483946ABDO FINANCE MANAGER SUPPORTABDO LLP01/31/24100-41500-50300 21,800.04 Total For Check 35040 Check 35041 35041212.97 02/22/2419RK-QGPM-PX3MOFFICE AND BUILDING SUPPLIESAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES02/02/24100-41900-50210 35041319.62 02/22/2416CL-NYNQ-PCPMDISPOSABLE GLOVESAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES02/02/24100-42100-50210 3504192.21 02/22/241XPM-FH9C-C1F9NITRILE GLOVESAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES02/05/24100-42100-50210 624.80 Total For Check 35041 Check 35042 350421,870.00 02/22/24BP22-0012BP22-0012 ESCROW REFUNDANGEL ZUEHL02/13/24100-00000-22205 1,870.00 Total For Check 35042 Check 35043 350435,863.00 02/22/246180679EXHAUST SYSTEM SENSOR REPLACEMENTB & D PLUMBING HEATING & AC01/31/24100-43100-50223 5,863.00 Total For Check 35043 Check 35044 3504423.34 02/22/242559623UNLEADED FUELBEAUDRY OIL COMPANY02/08/24100-41900-50212 3504422.49 02/22/242533312UNLEADED FUELBEAUDRY OIL COMPANY01/10/24100-41900-50212 350441,062.43 02/22/242559623UNLEADED FUELBEAUDRY OIL COMPANY02/08/24100-42100-50212 350441,023.28 02/22/242533312UNLEADED FUELBEAUDRY OIL COMPANY01/10/24100-42100-50212 3504481.73 02/22/242559623UNLEADED FUELBEAUDRY OIL COMPANY02/08/24100-43100-50212 350441,439.50 02/22/242533311ULS DYED KODIAK PLUSBEAUDRY OIL COMPANY01/10/24100-43100-50212 3504478.71 02/22/242533312UNLEADED FUELBEAUDRY OIL COMPANY01/10/24100-43100-50212 3,731.48 Total For Check 35044 Check 35045 35045101.50 02/22/245026LEGAL SERVICES - JANUARY 2024CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER01/31/24100-00000-22205-128 350457,859.00 02/22/245026LEGAL SERVICES - JANUARY 2024CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER01/31/24100-41600-50300 350453,720.00 02/22/245026LEGAL SERVICES - JANUARY 2024CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER01/31/24100-42100-50304 11,680.50 Total For Check 35045 Check 35046 3504617.10 02/22/2402062024GAS BILL JANUARY 2024CENTERPOINT ENERGY 02/06/24100-41900-50381 35046324.42 02/22/2402062024GAS BILL JANUARY 2024CENTERPOINT ENERGY 02/06/24100-43100-50381 341.52 Total For Check 35046 Check 35047 350472,261.80 02/22/2402052024TUITION REIMBURSEMENTCHRISTENSEN BUCK, JESSICA02/05/24100-45100-50207 2,261.80 Total For Check 35047 Check 35048 35048146.37 02/22/244182621663CITY HALL FLOOR MATSCINTAS - 47002/07/24100-41900-50400 350486.60 02/22/244182621654UNIFORM/DISPOSABLE BATHROOM MATSCINTAS - 47002/07/24100-43100-50400 3504830.55 02/22/244182621675CRT CABINET/DISPOSABLE MATCINTAS - 47002/07/24100-43100-50400 3504883.70 02/22/244181980254SHOP TOWELS AND DISPOSABLE BATHROOCINTAS - 47001/31/24100-43100-50400 3504830.09 02/22/244181980262UNIFORMS AND DISPOSABLE BATHROOM MCINTAS - 47001/31/24100-43100-50400 3504835.27 02/22/244182621654UNIFORM/DISPOSABLE BATHROOM MATSCINTAS - 47002/07/24100-43100-50417 35048212.99 02/22/244182621752UNIFORMSCINTAS - 47002/07/24100-43100-50417 3504835.27 02/22/244181980262UNIFORMS AND DISPOSABLE BATHROOM MCINTAS - 47001/31/24100-43100-50417 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 2/7Page: 02/15/2024 04:09 PM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/09/2024 - 02/22/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 35048 35048212.99 02/22/244181980294UNIFORMSCINTAS - 47001/31/24100-43100-50417 793.83 Total For Check 35048 Check 35049 35049455.00 02/22/24BP23-0052-4BP23-0052 STAFF PLANNER REVEIW JAN CITY OF CORCORAN02/08/24100-00000-22205 35049200.00 02/22/24BP23-0045-2BP23-0045 STAFF PLANNER REVIEW JAN CITY OF CORCORAN02/08/24100-00000-22205 350491,815.00 02/22/24BP23-0045-3BP23-0045 STAFF PLANNER REVIEW JAN CITY OF CORCORAN02/08/24100-00000-22205 35049487.50 02/22/24BP23-0038-4BP23-0038 STAFF PLANNER REVIEW JAN CITY OF CORCORAN02/08/24100-00000-22205 35049536.25 02/22/24BP23-0053-2BP23-0053 STAFF PLANNER REVIEW JAN CITY OF CORCORAN02/08/24100-00000-22205 35049276.25 02/22/24BP24-0001BP24-0001 STAFF PLANNER REVIEW JAN CITY OF CORCORAN02/08/24100-00000-22205 3504932.50 02/22/24BP23-0022-7BP23-0022 STAFF PLANNER REVIEW JAN CITY OF CORCORAN02/08/24100-00000-22205 3504997.50 02/22/24BP23-0048-3BP23-0048 STAFF PLANNER REVIEW JAN CITY OF CORCORAN02/08/24100-00000-22205 3504927.53 02/22/24013124UB BILL 20200 CO RD 50CITY OF CORCORAN01/31/24100-45200-50382 3504927.53 02/22/24013120246620 CO RD 116 UB BILLCITY OF CORCORAN01/31/24100-45200-50382 3,955.06 Total For Check 35049 Check 35050 35050269.18 02/22/2402052024CITY HALL/POLICE INTERNETCOMCAST - 002320202/05/24100-41900-50321 35050269.17 02/22/2402052024CITY HALL/POLICE INTERNETCOMCAST - 002320202/05/24100-42100-50321 538.35 Total For Check 35050 Check 35051 35051128.66 02/22/2402052024PHONE SERVICES 02/10/24-03/09/24COMCAST 004489302/05/24100-43100-50321 128.66 Total For Check 35051 Check 35052 350522,600.00 02/22/24368/679MANAGED SERVICES MONTHLY BILLING FCOMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH02/08/24100-41920-50300 35052629.04 02/22/24368914ARUBA SWITCH CARECOMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH02/09/24100-41920-50300 350528,835.50 02/22/24368237SERVICE ENGINEER SUPPORT - ONSITE/COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH01/31/24100-41920-50300 35052100.00 02/22/24367787SNAGIT MAINTENANCE RENEWALCOMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH01/31/24100-41920-50300 350527,347.94 02/22/24367972ARUBA NETWORKING SWITCHCOMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH02/06/24416-41920-50580 19,512.48 Total For Check 35052 Check 35053 350531,600.00 02/22/24CPG-COR-01.01.22024 ANNUAL LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT CRAIG RAPP, LLC01/01/24100-41320-50433 1,600.00 Total For Check 35053 Check 35054 3505463.40 02/22/24114X95478901OFFICE WATERCULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER01/31/24100-41900-50210 3505486.00 02/22/24100X07987402OFFICE WATERCULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER01/31/24100-42100-50210 149.40 Total For Check 35054 Check 35055 3505512,275.00 02/22/2441849WATER TANKDERSON MFG01/30/24416-43100-50550 12,275.00 Total For Check 35055 Check 35056 350562,980.80 02/22/24258045MOWER TOOTH KITDIAMOND MOWERS02/07/24100-43100-50225 2,980.80 Total For Check 35056 Check 35057 3505755.41 02/22/24984912FEB 14 PAT/MARCH 5 PRIMARY ELECTIOECM PUBLISHERS INC02/08/24100-41900-50350 35057241.41 02/22/24984087HUD RELEASE OF FUNDS REQUEST PUBLIECM PUBLISHERS INC02/01/24100-41900-50350 35057352.43 02/22/249840882021/2022 BUDGET PUBLICATIONECM PUBLISHERS INC02/01/24100-41900-50350 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 3/7Page: 02/15/2024 04:09 PM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/09/2024 - 02/22/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 35057 649.25 Total For Check 35057 Check 35058 35058265.00 02/22/2434958LIFT TANKENDE SEPTIC SERVICE11/22/23100-41900-50401 265.00 Total For Check 35058 Check 35059 350591,178.76 02/22/240524796WATER METERSFERGUSON WATERWORKS #251802/06/24601-49400-50210 1,178.76 Total For Check 35059 Check 35060 3506077.65 02/22/244010316JANUARY 2024 SUPPORT SERVICESGOPHER STATE ONE CALL01/31/24601-49400-50380 3506077.65 02/22/244010316JANUARY 2024 SUPPORT SERVICESGOPHER STATE ONE CALL01/31/24602-49450-50380 155.30 Total For Check 35060 Check 35061 350612.50 02/22/241000219129VIEW RECORDED DOCUMENTSHENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS REC02/07/24100-41910-50300 350612.50 02/22/241000219129VIEW RECORDED DOCUMENTSHENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS REC02/07/24100-42400-50300 5.00 Total For Check 35061 Check 35062 35062333.36 02/22/241000218791RADIO FLEET FEE 01/2024HENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH02/06/24100-43100-50323 333.36 Total For Check 35062 Check 35063 350631,477.62 02/22/241000218724RADIO FLEET FEE 01/2024HENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH02/06/24100-42100-50323 1,477.62 Total For Check 35063 Check 35064 3506465.00 02/22/24003401022400CAR WASH JANUARY 2024HOLIDAY COMPANIES02/01/24100-42100-50403 65.00 Total For Check 35064 Check 35065 3506580.00 02/22/2435228BP22-0021 PLANNING SERVICELANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/13/24100-00000-22205 35065240.00 02/22/2435232BP23-0014 PLANNING SERVICESLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/13/24100-00000-22205 3506580.00 02/22/2435233BP23-0038 PLANNING SERVICESLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/13/24100-00000-22205 350651,827.50 02/22/2435234BP23-0041 PLANNING SERVICESLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/13/24100-00000-22205 3506540.00 02/22/2435235BP23-0045 PLANNING SERVICESLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/13/24100-00000-22205 35065160.00 02/22/2435237BP23-0053 PLANNING SERVICESLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/13/24100-00000-22205 35065160.00 02/22/2435238BP24-0001 PLANNING SERVICESLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/13/24100-00000-22205 3506580.00 02/22/2435225COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS 21-057LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/07/24100-00000-22205-017 35065105.50 02/22/2435227TAVERA 4TH FPUD/FP 22-028LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/07/24100-00000-22205-056 3506525.50 02/22/2435229TAVERA 5TH FP/FPUD 22-068LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/07/24100-00000-22205-056 35065171.00 02/22/2435236TAVERA 6TH FPUD AND FP 23-032LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/07/24100-00000-22205-056 3506540.00 02/22/2435224BELLWETHER 3RD FP 19-017LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/07/24100-00000-22205-087 35065160.00 02/22/2435226RUSH CREEK RESERVE 2ND FP/FPUD 22-LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/07/24100-00000-22205-098 3506540.00 02/22/2435231RUSH CREEK RESERVE 3RD 23-007LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/07/24100-00000-22205-098 350655,247.50 02/22/2435230CITY BUSINESS PLANNER TIMELANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC02/07/24100-41910-50300 8,457.00 Total For Check 35065 Check 35066 3506679.13 02/22/2403-1055319BPA - HOSE HYDRAULICLANO EQUIPMENT02/05/24100-43100-50220 79.13 Total For Check 35066 Check 35067 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 4/7Page: 02/15/2024 04:09 PM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/09/2024 - 02/22/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 35067 350672,569.83 02/22/2402092024LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES JANUARY 2MADDEN, GALANTER, HANSEN LLP02/09/24100-41600-50300 2,569.83 Total For Check 35067 Check 35068 35068180.28 02/22/2428274PVC CAPS, MINI ROLLER SET, CARPET MENARDS MAPLE GROVE02/01/24100-42100-50223 180.28 Total For Check 35068 Check 35069 3506923,413.36 02/22/240001167848WASTE WATER SERVICES MARCH 2024METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO02/01/24602-49450-50312 23,413.36 Total For Check 35069 Check 35070 3507034,790.00 02/22/2401-2024JANUARY 2024 SAC CHARGESMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL02/01/24602-00000-20800 35070(347.90)02/22/2401-2024JANUARY 2024 SAC CHARGESMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL02/01/24602-00000-36200 34,442.10 Total For Check 35070 Check 35071 3507167.62 02/22/24182732FILTERSMILLER CHEVROLET02/09/24100-43100-50220 67.62 Total For Check 35071 Check 35072 3507250.00 02/22/2410923JOB POSTING - PROGRAM COORDINATOR MN RECREATION/PARK ASSOC02/09/24100-45100-50300 50.00 Total For Check 35072 Check 35073 35073200.00 02/22/2401002024 MSCIC CONFERANCEMSCIC02/15/24100-42100-50207 200.00 Total For Check 35073 Check 35074 35074294.00 02/22/2452057535LB GREASENAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/06/24100-43100-50212 350744.83 02/22/24521128ROPE HANDLENAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/08/24100-45200-50210 3507410.49 02/22/24521110HOSE CONNECTORNAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/08/24100-45200-50210 309.32 Total For Check 35074 Check 35075 35075192.31 02/22/2402122024DEPENDENT CARE REIMBURSEMENTNATALIE DAVIS MCKEOWN02/12/24100-00000-21710 192.31 Total For Check 35075 Check 35076 35076133.06 02/22/24353415435001PAPER TOWEL, PERFORATED PAPERODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC02/01/24100-41900-50210 133.06 Total For Check 35076 Check 35077 350771,560.00 02/22/24236140PD TESTINGON-SITE MEDICAL SERVICES INC02/02/24100-42100-50300 1,560.00 Total For Check 35077 Check 35078 35078107.25 02/22/240001547594H.S.A MAINTENANCE FEE (OCT-DEC 23)OPTUM01/16/24100-41900-50300 107.25 Total For Check 35078 Check 35079 3507968,228.72 02/22/242277052074 PAY CORCORAN WATER TOWER STORAGE TANK PHOENIX FABRICATORS & ERECTO02/15/24601-00000-16500 35079(3,411.40)02/22/242277052074 PAY CORCORAN WATER TOWER STORAGE TANK PHOENIX FABRICATORS & ERECTO02/15/24601-00000-20610 64,817.32 Total For Check 35079 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 5/7Page: 02/15/2024 04:09 PM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/09/2024 - 02/22/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 35080 35080284.71 02/22/240894-006560164CITY HALL GARBAGE JANUARY 2024REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/24100-41900-50380 35080166.98 02/22/240894-006560973PUBLIC WORKS GARBAGE JANUARY 2024REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/24100-43100-50380 35080919.23 02/22/240894-006556978CITY RECYCLING JANUARY 2024REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/24100-43201-50300 3508088.38 02/22/240894-006562081WILDFLOWER PARK GARBAGE JANUARY 20REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/24100-45200-50380 35080204.78 02/22/240894-006560020CITY PARK GARBAGE JANUARY 2024REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/24100-45200-50380 1,664.08 Total For Check 35080 Check 35081 35081153.00 02/22/2468307BOBCAT GLASS DOORRTL EQUIPMENT02/09/24100-43100-50225 153.00 Total For Check 35081 Check 35082 35082632.00 02/22/2410198971WINTER TIRESSUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC01/09/24100-42100-50403 632.00 Total For Check 35082 Check 35083 350831,893.47 02/22/24663002SQUAD 570 MUFFLER / CAR REPAIRSUPERIOR FORD11/14/23100-42100-50220 35083506.00 02/22/24663002SQUAD 570 MUFFLER / CAR REPAIRSUPERIOR FORD11/14/23100-42100-50403 2,399.47 Total For Check 35083 Check 35084 35084400.68 02/22/24020224UNION DUES/TLDF FEBRUARY 2024TEAMSTER LOCAL 32002/01/24100-00000-21707 400.68 Total For Check 35084 Check 35085 350851,756.30 02/22/24IN-153328BUILDING MAINTENANCETHOMAS SCIENTIFIC02/07/24100-43100-50223 1,756.30 Total For Check 35085 Check 35086 35086855.00 02/22/2424020100CITY HALL & PD CLEANINGULTIMATE CLEANERS LLC02/01/24100-41900-50401 855.00 Total For Check 35086 Check 35087 3508790.00 02/22/2410329CORCORAN POLICE LOGO EMBROIDERYUNIQUE EMBROIDERY02/05/24100-42100-50417 90.00 Total For Check 35087 Check 35088 35088150.00 02/22/243958386CITY HALL SEWER/WATER PROJECT REVIMN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY02/09/24100-41900-50300 3508848.00 02/22/2402532TRAINING - SENSIBLE LAND USE COALICREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/05/24100-41910-50207 3508895.00 02/22/2402032024CHILD RESTRAINT SAFETY TRAINING - CREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/03/24100-42100-50207 3508855.82 02/22/24161455TRAINING MEALCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/08/24100-42100-50207 350886.00 02/22/24012CRITICAL INCIDENT DEBRIEF MEETING CREDIT CARD PURCHASES11/17/23100-42100-50207 3508860.00 02/22/24676127FLEET MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE 02/09/24FLEETIO02/09/24100-42100-50300 3508875.00 02/22/243609221-202401-PD INVESTIGATIONS JANUARY 2024TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIV02/01/24100-42100-50300 3508813.00 02/22/2402012024CAR WASHCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/01/24100-42100-50403 3508825.00 02/22/241045436MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY EVENCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/06/24100-42400-50207 3508830.00 02/22/241045437MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY EVENCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/06/24100-42400-50207 3508835.00 02/22/241045441MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY EVENCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/06/24100-42400-50207 3508830.00 02/22/241045433MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY EVENCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/06/24100-42400-50207 35088420.00 02/22/242024-A0091CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION MN CONFCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/13/24100-43100-50207 350881,926.82 02/22/24301305DETECTIVE SQUAD BUILDUPCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/02/24416-42100-50210 2,969.64 Total For Check 35088 Check 35089 35089210.97 02/22/249955191476PD/CH CELL PHONE SERVICE VERIZON WIRELESS01/26/24100-41900-50321 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 6/7Page: 02/15/2024 04:09 PM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/09/2024 - 02/22/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 35089 35089521.18 02/22/249955191476PD/CH CELL PHONE SERVICE VERIZON WIRELESS01/26/24100-42100-50321 35089480.49 02/22/249955191476PD/CH CELL PHONE SERVICE VERIZON WIRELESS01/26/24100-42100-50323 1,212.64 Total For Check 35089 Check 35090 3509054.00 02/22/2486165LAB FEES WATER LABORATORIES, INC. 02/07/24601-49400-50210 54.00 Total For Check 35090 Check 35091 35091338.78 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-00000-22205 35091278.87 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-00000-22205-007 35091825.09 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-00000-22205-056 350911,186.23 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-00000-22205-065 35091622.53 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-00000-22205-087 35091218.19 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-00000-22205-098 3509196.60 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-00000-22205-132 350912,474.43 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-41900-50381 3509161.08 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-42151-50381 35091202.63 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-43100-50381 35091100.26 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23100-45200-50381 3509174.97 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23601-49400-50380 35091329.47 02/22/2435031040720UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT01/10/23602-49450-50380 6,809.13 Total For Check 35091 Check 35092 3509221.85 02/22/248634511269820 CO RD 101 WATER METERXCEL ENERGY02/01/24601-49400-50381 21.85 Total For Check 35092 Check 35093 35093160.96 02/22/24863674086BELLWETHER - STREET LIGHTSXCEL ENERGY02/05/24100-00000-22205 160.96 Total For Check 35093 Check 35094 3509430.16 02/22/248641418049700 CTY RD 19 STREET LIGHTXCEL ENERGY02/07/24100-43100-50381 30.16 Total For Check 35094 Check 35095 35095202.65 02/22/2485028AUDIO UPGRADE INSTALLATION Z SYSTEMS, INC02/07/24210-41920-50300 202.65 Total For Check 35095 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 7/7Page: 02/15/2024 04:09 PM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/09/2024 - 02/22/2024 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number 103,993.99 Fund 100 GENERAL FUND 202.65 Fund 210 ARPA FUND 21,549.76 Fund 416 CAPITAL-EQUIPMENT CERTS 66,224.55 Fund 601 WATER 58,262.58 Fund 602 SEWER Fund Totals: 250,233.53 Total For All Funds: Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Daryl Kirschenman, PE Steve Hegland, PE Project/File: 227705274 Date: February 15, 2024 Subject: Pay Application #10 to Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors Council Action Requested Staff is recommending Council Approve Pay Application #10 for the Corcoran Water Tower Project to Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors in the amount of $64,817.32. This pay request covers work complete from January 16, 2024 through February 15, 2024. Summary Phoenix fabricators has completed the tower concrete dome on top of the tower shaft. The steel work is anticipated to be completed this spring. Site piping will begin this spring when weather permits. This pay request is for completed work on the concrete dome construction and shoring. It also includes additional stored material steel invoices for steel required to fabricate the steel tank. The signed payment request form and pay application is attached for review. Total Contract Value to Date $4,703,386.00 Work Completed to Date $2,007,514.06 5% Retainage $100,375.70 Amount Paid to Date $1,842,321.04 Total Pay App #10 $64,817.32 Engineer’s Recommendation We recommend approving Pay Application #10 to Phoenix Fabricators and Erector’s in the amount of $64,817.32. Agenda Item: 7d. Unit Price EJCDC C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment (c) 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved.1 of 3 Progress Estimate - Unit Price Work Contractor's Application for Payment 1 5,600.00 115,000.00 3,304.00 LS 1 115,000.00 76,500.00 172,000.00 172,000.00 5,600.00 100% FOUNDATION TANK SHAFT TANK MATERIAL / SHOP FABRICATION LS 194,000.00 1.00 153,000.00 - LS 100% 100% 886,000.00 886,000.00 50% 1.13 1.00 1 - - EA 115,000.00 30 1 0.50 76,500.00 0% BONDS / INSURANCE MOBILIZATION - 1 LS ALTERNATE A - 1,000,000 GALLON COMPOSITE TANK 1.11 28.00 LS 1.00 76,500.00 - 1 1.12 194,000.00 194,000.00 - 1.10 0% 118 153,000.00 115,000.00 ENGINEERING 172,000.00 1.00 194,000.00 172,000.00 3,304.00 - 376,844.75 886,000.00 31% 1.15 100% 1.14 1 840,149.25 303,825.11 1,216,994.00 1,216,994.00 73,019.64 70,000.00 70,000.00 70,000.00 TANK DELIVERY LS 0.06 1 - 886,000.00 - LS - 0% 23,128.00 15 0% EA LB 15.00 14 1,800.00 - 75.00 2 1,000.00 - 23,610.69 - 0% EA - LS 1,800.00 SY 36,389.31 60,000.00 4' X 6' OVERFLOW SPLASHPAD CONCRETE SIDEWALK 8" BOLLARD CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V NON WEAR - 16 20 2,000.00 2,000.00 1 8,000.00 17 8,000.00 0% 1,800.00 - 4,000 1,500.00 8,000.00 18 13 1,750 - SY 4,550.00 - 1 0% 4,550.00 19 AGGREGATE BASE 61% - 1,500.00 0% - 36,389.31 - 1,625 TN 49.00 79,625.00 2.60 472.00 8,500.00 - BITUMINOUS RIBBON CURB 25 - 4.50 225 0% 4,500.00 0% - 8,500.00 26 MNDOT SEED MIXTURE 25-131 2.5" B&B DECIDUOUS TREE 6' HT CONIFEROUS TREE SHRUB 5 GAL. CONTAINER PERENNIAL 1 GAL. CONTAINER 1.4 B618 CURB SILT FENCE, MS INFILTRATION BASIN, FILTER FABRIC, 6' DRAIN TILE & 6' FLARED END 56,497.00 33,250.00 19,270.00 - 21 24 LF 80% 1,250 0% 23,128.00 175 33,250.00 BITUMINOUS WEAR SPWEA340B BITUMINOUS BASE SPNWB330B TN - 43,875.00 - 31.00 20 195.00 22 15,810.00 - TN 15,810.00 LF 190.00 LF - 23 0% 43,875.00 510 47.00 - 0% 410 - 29% 19,270.00 5,625.00 1,000.00 4,500.00 1,125.00 1 LS 8,500.00 0% EA - 9,020.00 9,020.00 28 - 670.00 6,700.00 820.00 EA - AC - 0% 6,700.00 0% - 29 56 EA 10 100.00 11,508.00 8,220.00 27 11 - 11,508.00 Owner:City of Corcoran Stantec Consulting Services Phoenix Fabricators & Erectors, LLC 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tank Corcoran Water Tower Owner's Project No.: Engineer's Project No.: Contractor's Project No.: Engineer: Contractor: Project: Contract: 227705274 3927 % of Value of Item (J / F) (%) Contract Information Value of Work Completed to Date (E X G) ($) C Bid Item No.Description 4,000.00 L 5,000.00 Work Completed 0.03 1 LS LS 6,500.00 0.62 E 6,500.00 4,000.00 B PART 1 SITE WORK 02/15/24 1 01/16/24 Original Contract I Item Quantity K From LS 185,000.00 Estimated Quantity Incorporated in the Work Materials Currently Stored (not in G) ($) D Units 185,000.00 Application Period: 180,000.00 3% Value of Bid Item (C X E) ($) 4,000.00 A 1 - 4,000.00 Balance to Finish (F - J) ($) G To F Work Completed and Materials Stored to Date (H + I) ($) Unit Price ($) 5,000.00 02/15/24 2 Application No.: MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL SALVAGE, STOCKPILE & RESPREAD TOPSOIL 1 - 0% H Application Date: 3 TEN J 4,000.00 1 75% 2,500.00 1,000.00 62% 4 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLACEMENT & COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 20" PVC WATER MAIN 20" PVC WATERMAIN, C900 LS 0.75 3,000.00 4,000.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 0% 20" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52, INCLUDE POLY WRAP - 50 0% - 7,146.00 10 - LF 0% 117.00 40.00 397.00 355 18 EA 0% 6" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52, INCLUDE POLY WRAP 6" GATE VALVE & BOX 6" HYDRANT DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS CY 6,435.00 8 2,000.00 - 31,000.00 20" GATE VALVE - 1,612.00 4,823.00 11 EA 9 2 4,000.00 - - 31,000.00 2,000.00 265.00 6 94,075.00 LF 7,146.00 1,612.00 55 LF - - 1 5 25% EA 8,000.00 - 5,700.00 1 5,700.00 - 0% 31,000.00 5,700.00 7 - 94,075.00 EA 17,024.00 - 4,266.00 11,349.00 11,349.00 67% 3,734.00 5,675.00 8,512.00 53% 12 2 4,266.00 Unit Price EJCDC C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment (c) 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved.2 of 3 Progress Estimate - Unit Price Work Contractor's Application for Payment 142,400.00 3 1 30,000.00 1 30,000.00 - 42,075.00 $ 17,600.00 90,000.00 0.11 25,000.00 $ 2,695,871.9457,441.42 17,600.00 2 25,000.00 - 0% 160,000.00 11% 1 825 $ 3 CY 43% 160,000.00 825.00 42,075.00 42,075.00 4 LS 0.25 $ 2,007,514.06Original Contract Totals 120,000.00 - 25% $ 4,703,386.00 ,650,072.64 25,000.00 120,000.00 LS 51.00 100% Balance to Finish (F - J) ($) LS 380,000.00 0% Engineer: Contractor: Project: Contract: TEN Application Date:02/15/24 City of Corcoran Stantec Consulting Services Phoenix Fabricators & Erectors, LLC 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tank Corcoran Water Tower G H Contract Information Value of Bid Item (C X E) ($) J Materials Currently Stored (not in G) ($) Item Quantity Units 1 - Work Completed and Materials Stored to Date (H + I) ($) To B I Work Completed - 380,000.00 1.17 1 LS FromApplication No.: F L % of Value of Item (J / F) (%) 227705274 3927 01/16/24 CA Value of Work Completed to Date (E X G) ($) Bid Item No.Description Owner's Project No.: Engineer's Project No.: Contractor's Project No.: D E Application Period: Estimated Quantity Incorporated in the Work Unit Price ($) 1.16 TANK ERECTION TANK PAINTING TANK MIXING SYSTEM EROSION CONTROL 02/15/24 K Owner: 380,000.00 0% 1.19 0% 450,000.00 450,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 - - 1 1.18 20,000.00 450,000.00 LS 8,500.00 8,500.00 0.50 LS - 4,250.00 4,250.00 50% 4,250.00 1.20 ELECTRICAL / CONTROLS LOGO ALLOWANCE STRUCTURAL FILL BELOW FOUNDATION COMMON EXCAVATION & SITE GRADING 1 LS 1 - Unit Price EJCDC C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment (c) 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved.3 of 3 Progress Estimate - Unit Price Work Contractor's Application for Payment Application Period: From Owner's Project No.: Engineer's Project No.: Contractor's Project No.: City of Corcoran Stantec Consulting Services Phoenix Fabricators & Erectors, LLC 1.0 MG Elevated Water Storage Tank Corcoran Water Tower Owner: 227705274 3927 Engineer: Contractor: Project: Contract: Application No.:TEN - Work Completed Change Order Totals $ - Original Contract and Change Orders Project Totals $ 4,703,386.00 $ - Estimated Quantity Incorporated in the Work Application Date: - Value of Bid Item (C X E) ($) - $ % of Value of Item (J / F) (%) C LF Description 1 $ 357,441.42 43% A $ 2,695,871.94 B Materials Currently Stored (not in G) ($) -$ - $ 2,007,514.06 K 02/15/24 - To Contract Information Balance to Finish (F - J) ($) Bid Item No. - G H Work Completed and Materials Stored to Date (H + I) ($) I - 02/15/24 Units - - - - $ J - $ ,650,072.64 D Value of Work Completed to Date (E X G) ($) Item Quantity E 01/16/24 Unit Price ($) Change Orders - - EJCDC C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment Unit Price 3 of 3(c) 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7e. Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Jay Tobin Topic Lifecycle Replacement – Chamber Chairs Action Required Approval Summary Council Chamber chairs are past due for replacement. The current chairs predate the current City Hall building circa pre-1994 and have been reupholstered to extend their useful life past their original asset life. Office furniture has an asset life of 7 years using IRS depreciation tables. Staff reviewed appropriate options and recommend the purchase of 12 (or more) chairs at $281.00 each from 9to5 Seating (see attached as the Mid-level option). Financial/Budget The estimated cost for the project is not expected to exceed $4,000 funded using a long- range planning budget. Recommendation Staff recommend proceeding with the purchase of council chamber replacement chairs not to exceed the approved budget. Council Action 1. Authorize staff to proceed with the purchase of council chamber chairs. 2. Decline purchase of council chamber chairs. 3. Request staff to review other seating alternatives council chambers. Attachments 1. Proposed replacement chair options. COUNCIL CHAIRS High: $878.40, 12 Year Warranty (MIllerKnoll Cosm) https://store.hermanmiller.com/furniture-groups/cosm- chair/100128920.html?lang=en_US&sku=100128920 (Intereum) This is what we currently have in our conference rooms. Mid: $281.00, 5 Year Warranty (9to5 Seating @NCE – 205) https://minnesotaof.com/ Low: $219.00 (per email; $263 on web) Limited Lifetime Warranty. *Assembly Required (U.S. Discount Office Furniture – St. Paul) https://usdiscountofficefurniture.com/products/classic-basic-task-with-arms?variant=19862112600134 $175.99; 2 Year Limited Warranty *Assembly Required (Flash Furniture HL-0016-1-) https://www.officedepot.com/a/products/9073519/Flash-Furniture-Ergonomic-Mesh-High-Back/#Specs Attachment Item: 7e1. Government Surplus/Used/Discount: Minnesota Department of Administration Surplus Services: Nothing available in lots of 12 or more. MinnBid: Nothing available in lots of 12 or more. $100.00 ($80 for fixed arms) Pre-owned, excellent condition. (U.S. Discount Office Furniture – St. Paul) Steelcase Jersey Mesh-Back Chair – US Discount Office Furniture $50.00 Used, excellent condition. (TJ Office Furniture – Plymouth) https://tjofficefurniture.com/collections/all- chairs/products/office-chair-10 STAFF REPORT Revised Agenda Item: 7f. Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Michelle Friedrich Topic Planning Commission Appointment Action Required Approval; Appointment discussion Summary The City received a notice of resignation from Jon Horn and Jay Van Den Einde of the Planning Commission in January 2024. The Council should discuss appointing individuals to fill the two vacant seats. Financial/Budget Planning Commission members serve without compensation. Options 1. Appoint two individuals to the Planning Commission. Recommendation Staff recommends using the most recent applicant list to consider an appointment. Council Action Consider a motion to appoint an individual to the Planning Commission for a term ending February 28, 2027. Attachments 1.Application – Cecilia Kozicky 2.Application – Chris Lehman 3.Added Application - Peter Hargreaves 4.Added Application - Georgia Begin Added Agenda Item: 7f3. Added Agenda Item: 7f4. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7f. Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Michelle Friedrich Topic Planning Commission Appointment Action Required Approval; Appointment discussion Summary The City received a notice of resignation from Jon Horn and Jay Van Den Einde of the Planning Commission in January 2024. The Council should discuss appointing individuals to fill the two vacant seats. Financial/Budget Planning Commission members serve without compensation. Options 1. Appoint two individuals to the Planning Commission. Recommendation Staff recommends using the most recent applicant list to consider an appointment. Council Action Consider a motion to appoint an individual to the Planning Commission for a term ending February 28, 2027. Attachments 1. Application – Cecilia Kozicky 2. Application – Chris Lehman Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7g. City Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Natalie Davis McKeown Topic 2023 Construction Hours Update Action Required Informational 1.Background The City Council requested annual updates on complaints and enforcement related to construction hours since the noise nuisance ordinance was updated in 2021 (Chapter 82.04, Subd. 5). 2. Analysis Staff does not believe any complaints were received in 2023 regarding the construction hours window (7AM – 7PM on weekdays and 8AM – 4PM on weekends and holidays) being too large or too burdensome. This will be a specific data point collected going forward. Code Enforcement staff received 4 after-the-fact complaints regarding construction noise occurring outside of the allowed hours. Code Enforcement staff followed up with each developer associated with the location of the complaint to notify them of the complaint and clarify the construction hours. Complainants were directed to reach out to the police department should the activity happen again. This data was not tracked in 2022, but staff is confident more than 4 after-the-fact complaints were received by Code Enforcement in 2022. Police documented 2 called-in suspected construction hour violations in 2023. Of these complaints, 1 of the violations was confirmed. This is compared to 14 called-in suspected construction hour violations and 8 confirmed violations in 2022. The police utilize an educational approach first and inform individuals of the allowed construction hours. In the one instance where police confirmed a violation in 2023, the delivery drivers complied with a request to stop by the police. No one was formally charged with the 1 confirmed violation. Hypothetically, if an individual was found to be in violation of the ordinance more than once, then they would be charged at that time. Code Enforcement and Police received complaints at the following developments: -Tavera (3) -Walcott Glen - Garages Too -St. Therese Staff were directed in 2023 to create City construction hour signs to post at developments. 10 signs were created. This number was chosen based on the cost of the signs and the 2023 budget. The amount of signs will quickly be exceeded by the Page 2 of 2 amount of active development within the City. In an effort to maximize the use of the limited signs, staff were working on creating a policy that would require developers to post a construction hours sign at the development’s construction entrance once a certain number of complaints were received. As a part of this policy, developers would be required to sign a contract and take responsibility for certain damage that occurs to the sign while in their possession. This may also require a change to the City Code and/or the City’s Development Agreement and Site Improvement Performance Agreement templates to be enforceable when a developer does not choose to voluntarily comply with the policy. However, staff capacity did not allow for this to be completed in 2023 as other priorities and incoming land use applications were elevated. Should the Council want staff to prioritize completing implementation of the construction hours signs in 2024, staff should be directed to add this to the work plan with clarification on the expected timeline and where this stands among other identified 2024 priorities. Otherwise, creation of the policy and implementation will remain on staffs’ to-do list to be completed as time allows. Figure 1 Sign Proof of City of Corcoran’s Construction Hours Sign Page 1 of 7 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7h. Planning Commission Meeting: February 22, 2024 Prepared By: Dwight Klingbeil Topic: Lister Garage CUP (PID 19-119-23-21-0007) (City File No. 23-031) Action Required: Recommendation 1.Application Request Carrie Johnson, the applicant, on behalf of Dan and Peggy Lister, requests approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a garage with a sidewall height of greater than 10’ located in the side yard for the property at 26315 Julie Ann Drive. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item at their February 1, 2024, meeting. No public comments were received. The Planning Commission unanimously (4-0; Commissioner Horn absent) recommended approval of the application and the resolution as drafted. 3.Context Zoning and Land Use The proposed property is guided for Rural/Ag Residential and zoned Rural Residential (RR). The property has an existing single-family home with an attached garage. The property is outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Surrounding Properties All surrounding properties are guided for Rural/Ag Residential, within the RR district, and outside of the MUSA. The properties to the north, east, and south are residential uses, and the two properties to the west are used for agricultural/residential uses. Natural Characteristics of the Site Figure 1 Site Location Page 2 of 7 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan’s Natural Resource Inventory Areas map indicates the presence of shrub wetland community on the western edge of this property. According to the Hennepin County Natural Resources Map, the western section of the property contains a small portion of a 100-year flood basin that is part of the larger wetland complex. The Engineering Report noted that the wetlands on this site were reviewed and were found to be unaffected by this project. 4. Analysis Planning staff coordinated review of the request for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, City Code requirements, and City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report. The detailed comments are included in the attached Engineering Memo, and the approval conditions require compliance with the Memo. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a CUP is limited to whether the proposed request meets the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the CUP. I.Accessory Structure CUP Figure 2 Hennepin County Natural Resources Map The applicant proposes to construct a detached garage of 1,600 square feet within a portion of the side and front yard on the 5.41-acre parcel. Location and Setbacks The structure is proposed to be placed north of the principal structure within the side and front yard which is allowed. The garage meets the 10’ minimum separation from the residence. The structure is closest to the front property line to the northeast and is setback 122’ where a 50’ minimum setback is required. The proposed placement meets this requirement and exceeds the side and rear setbacks (25’ and 15’ respectively). Size Section 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance allows an accessory building footprint of 2,563 square feet for a lot of this size. There are no other detached structures on the property, and there is an existing attached garage of roughly 900 square feet. Since the attached garage is less than 1000 square feet, it does not count toward the allowed 2,563 square foot footprint for the property. Altogether, the applicant proposes 1600 square feet of accessory structure space subject to the footprint limit. This complies Figure 3 Site Plan with the standard. Should the applicant need to expand the accessory structure space in the future, they may be able to expand it by another 963 square feet. Additionally, one additional detached structure can be added if it is less than 200 square feet (as this is a specific exemption from the footprint limit). Building Height The building is partially located both in the front and side yards and is limited to a maximum sidewall height of 10’. The applicant requests a sidewall height of 15’ to allow the storage of personal vehicles and potentially a boat in the future. This request can be granted through a CUP. The proposed building height is 23.75’ and does not exceed the 35’ height limit for the RR district. Architectural Standards The plans show a typical detached garage with the use of pre-finished metal panels for the walls and roof. The front elevation illustrates a 12-foot garage door and a service door, with a cupola to provide architectural interest on the most visible façade. The other elevations incorporate windows with a door located on the south (noted as “right”) Page 3 of 7 Page 4 of 7 elevation, and an 8-foot garage door and windows on the west (noted as “back”) elevation. The building plans note the use of pre-finished steel panels for the walls and roof. Section 1030.020, Subd. 6 and Section 1060.050, Subd. 1(D) of the City Code allows metal siding and/or roofing on Accessory Structures via a Certificate of Compliance, provided they meet the standards adopted by the Minnesota State Building Code and have been treated with a factory applied color coating system that protects against any fading or degradation. Staff did not have any concerns with the materials proposed by the applicant. The Zoning Ordinance requires eaves (i.e., the underside or soffits on the side) and overhangs (i.e., the edge extending over the front and rear elevations) of at least 12” for all accessory buildings. The plans show eaves of 24” which exceed the minimum requirement, and overhangs of 12” which meet this requirement. Grading and Drainage The submitted survey shows a slight slope at the proposed structure location. The site plan proposes new elevations that will flatten out the proposed site and slope away from the structure. As noted in the Engineering Memo, a grading plan will be required at the time of building permit review. Conditional Use Permit Standards The applicant requests a CUP to exceed the maximum sidewall height of 10’ as allowed by Section 1030.020, Subd. 5(D). This provision in the City Code allows any building to exceed the allowable building height with a CUP. In order to grant a CUP, the following standards must be met: 1.The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. The proposed use is in conformance with the City regulations. The proposed improvements meet setbacks, the accessory structure footprint, and architectural requirements. The taller building sidewall is requested to accommodate storage of the applicant’s personal vehicles and garden equipment, and to do hobbies in. A condition of approval included in the draft resolution is that the structure cannot be used for commercial uses without a separate approval for a home occupation, Figure 4 Front Elevation Page 5 of 7 and the structure cannot be used as an accessory dwelling unit without approval of an administrative permit. 2.A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites, and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. The applicant submitted a certificate of survey and site plan that show the required features. The City’s wetland specialist confirmed that a wetland delineation is not needed for the project as shown. 3.Applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance. Staff finds that the taller building height would comply with the standards as follows: a.Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed taller building has no impact on the Comprehensive Plan. b.The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort. The CUP for the taller building would not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort of the surrounding neighborhood. The building would be below the 35’ maximum building height allowed for principal buildings in the RR district. The building would meet or exceed all setback requirements for the RR district. c.The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. Assuming the recommended conditions of approval are adopted, staff does not find reason to believe the CUP for the taller building would be injurious to the use and enjoyment of the surrounding properties for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed building is below the maximum building height and meets or exceeds all required setbacks. Page 6 of 7 d.The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. The surrounding properties are used for a mix of residential and agricultural uses. The proposed building does not preclude improvement or further development of the surrounding properties. e.Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Adequate public facilities are available to accommodate the proposed use. The taller building will not impact the demand for services. f.The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. If the CUP is approved with the conditions of approval as recommended by staff, the use will comply with the district regulations for the RR. g.The conditional use and site conform to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. If the CUP is approved with the conditions of approval as recommended by staff, the use will comply with the performance standards for accessory structures. 4.The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. As noted previously, the applicant proposes to use pre-finished metal wall- and roof panels. Section 1060.050 Subd. 1(D) of the Zoning Ordinance allows metal siding and/or roofing provided they meet the Minnesota State Building Code standards and are treated with a factory applied color coating system that protects against fading. The proposed materials feature G60 galvanized coating as well as zinc phosphate. Staff had no concerns with the materials proposed by the applicant. 5.The proposed building will be compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Page 7 of 7 5.Recommendation Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of Resolution 2024-13 approving the CUP for a detached garage exceeding a sidewall height of 10’ in the front and side yard. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2024-13 Approving the CUP 2.Applicant Narrative 3.Site Plan 4.Building Plans 5.Engineering Memo City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-13 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DETACHED STRUCTURE FOR DAN AND PEGGY LISTER AT 26315 JULIE ANN DRIVE (PID 19-119-23-21-0007) (CITY FILE 23-031) WHEREAS, Carrie Johnson, the applicant on behalf of Dan and Peggy Lister, the landowner, requests approval of a conditional use permit to allow an accessory building with a sidewall height of 15’ at property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the conditional use permit request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1.A conditional permit is approved, in accordance with the application received by the City on November 7, 2023, and additional information received on January 2, 2024, and January 18, 2024. 2.The applicant shall comply with all conditions of the City Engineer’s memo dated January 11, 2024. 3.A conditional use permit is approved to allow a 1,600 sq. ft. accessory building with sidewalls taller than 10 feet in the side yard, based on the finding that that conditional use permit standards in section 1070.020 have been satisfied. 4.A certificate of compliance to allow a metal roof and metal siding on this accessory building is approved as part of the conditional use permit. a.The building material must comply with Section 1060.050, Subd. 1(D)(3) of the Zoning Ordinance. 5.The structure cannot be used for commercial purposes unless the applicant applies for City approval of a home occupation and such approval is granted. 6.The structure cannot be used as an Accessory Dwelling Unit unless the applicant applies for an Administrative Permit and such approval is granted. 7.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant/landowner must complete the following: a.A grading plan must be submitted for final approval per the City’s Engineer Memo. b.The approving resolution must be recorded at Hennepin County. c.The applicant/landowner must provide proof of recording to the City. Agenda Attachment: 7h1. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-13 Page 2 of 3 8.Prior to release and close out of the escrow account, a final inspection must be completed by the City to confirm the project is completed per plan. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-13 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHEMENT A Lot 2, Block 1, Julie Anns Wildwest Estates, Hennepin County, Minnesota WriƩen NarraƟve 23615 Julie Ann Drive CondiƟonal Use Permit a) We are requesƟng to build an outbuilding approx. 32’ x 50’ for the clients to garden, do hobbies, and store cars in. b) There is no impact on adjoining properƟes. The home is on over 5 acres. c) One building; pole barn style, 32’ x 50’. d) The homeowners intend to use it for storage and hobbies. e) Normal dayƟme hours; this will not be used for business f) N/A g) N/A h) No impact on traffic, there will be an asphalt driveway connected to the exisƟng driveway that will go up to the new building. i) The new building will connect to the exisƟng well. A new well pump will be installed. There will be a new sepƟc installed for the building. j) No environmental impacts: there is a pong on the property, but this is far from that. k) There is a tree line on the north side of the property that will hide the building from adjacent neighbor. l) N/A m) N/A Agenda Attachment: 7h2. Attachment Item: 7h3. COLOR SCHEDULE SHEET STEEL TRIMS LOCATION COLOR LOCATION COLOR ROOF BURNISHED SLATE RIDGE CAP BURNISHED SLATE EAVE WALLS LIGHT STONE GABLE TRIM CLAY MIST GABLE WALLS LIGHT STONE EAVE TRIM CLAY MIST SOFFIT CLAY MIST CORNER TRIM UC.HT STONE WAINSCOT NA WAINSCOT CORNER NA UPPER SHEA THING NA WAINSCOT TRANSITION NA BASE TRIM UC.HT STONE SHEET STEEL CINTERIOR> CEILING LINER KESTREL WHITE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIMS WALL LINER KESTREL WHITE SERVICE DOOR TRIM CLAY MIST WAINSCOT LINER KESTREL WHITE OHO TRIM CLAY MIST PORCH CEILING NA WINDOW TRIM CLAY MIST SLIDER TRACK COVER NA MISCELLANEOUS SLIDER TRIM NA VERSETT A STONE NA SLIDER DOOR PANEL NA BOLLARD COVERS NA CUPOLA WALLS UC.HT STONE 308 MISCELLANEOUS CUPOLA ROOF BRONZE 213 ROOF VENT TRIM BURNISHED SLATE WEATHER VANE NA POST/ BEAM WRAP NA SHEET INDEX CU Tfi R Tl TITLE SHEET 5-0.5 STRUCTURAL NOTES 5-1 FOUNDATION PLAN 5-2 ROOF PLAN 5-3 ENGINEERINC. DETAILS SB-0.5 POST / BRACKET LAYOUT SB-I NOT USED SB-2 FLOOR PLAN SB-3 ELEVATIONS SB- SECTIONS SB-5 SCHEDULES t DETAILS h" 1 n specification, or I hereby c�rtify th a �t b; =�r under my direct report ��s pre�a ;:a t I a m a duly Licensed s upe rvi �1o n ��n gi nee r under the laws of theProfess1on a State of Minoesot a ././4 Pri n t Na me : t:>rlJV � Sign a t ure : ( ,/ --� '')ate: /�h1/.hl>L3 License # tf q z I lf / I 0 ,-,.,., __ ,.. ....-,.. I I ,:JI ,:JI NN JOB NAME: J BROTHERS -LISTER PROJECT a6 ,... ,... ·--Uwx ADDRESS: 23�5 JULIE ANN DRIVE JOB #: 23145 z !J<C -lLU.. lL LORETTO I MN 55351 cJ) (J PHONE #: 7"3-227-2331 SALES REP.: MIKE R. z 0 CUSTOMER SIGNATURE: -:::::J co _J <( I-co DRAWING HISTORY Qi1'.'. WOw..., REV.# DATE NOTES SIGNATURE :::::J 0:: U'I I-U'I I-en z -CONTRACT RECEIVED u 1-:C en • :::::J � 0:: 01'.'. II.. w--.... � 8 I-NU --crw cJ) £:! IO 8 -- 8 ♦ -- 8 -- 8 - -- � GENERAL NOTES w ':::L. � I. THE PLANS ANO SPECS AS OUTLINED ARE BASED ON THE DESIGN/BUILD PROCESS OF <( STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS, THE SUBCONTRACTORS HIRED BY STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS ANO THE Cl.. I-STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS SALES REPRESENTATIVE. IT IS THE BELIEF OF STRUCTURAL w zBUILDINGS ANO THE CUSTOMER THAT THESE PLANS ARE ACCURATE Cl 2. WHERE LACK OF INFORMATION, OR ANY DISCREPANCY SHOULD APPEAR IN THE ti)Cl w w DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS, WRITTEN INTERPRETATION FROM STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS (),! _J � MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THAT PORTION OF WORK. w <( 0 NO CHANGES, MOOIFICA TION OR OEVIA TIONS SHALL BE MADE FROM THE PLANS ANO I-ti) I-3. cf) -ti) SPECS WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS. :J ::::J ANY CONTRADICTIONS IN THE PLANS, SPECS, OR APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES MUST BE c<) u '1. I ,-BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS PRIOR TO WORK BEING N ' PERFORMED. IN THE EVENT OF A CONTRADICTION, THE SUBCONTRACTOR MAY BE cf) N REQUIRED TO PERFORM THE MORE STRINGENT AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. THIS DECISION (),! ' RELIES SOLELY ON STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS w 0 5. ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC :c ANO ADJACENT PROPERTIES FROM DAMAGE. I-0 I- l.. SUBCONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CUTTING/PATCHING OF NECESSARY (),! <( PENETRATIONS TO INCLUDE SHEETROCK, STEEL, POLY ANO CONCRETE. co 0-1. SUBCONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE ORGANIZING ANO DAILY CLEAN UP. -:, Cl <( w 8. SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL PROVIDE STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS WITH OPERATION MANUALS w I-ANO SHOP DRAWINGS AS REQUESTED. _J >-<( UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED IN THE PLANS. WINDOW ANO DOOR LOCATIONS SHALL BE I-£0 0 '!. I-I ALLOWED LEEWAY FOR SIOINC. ANO TRIMS TO BE BEST APPLIED. z :1::1: 3 10. UNLESS OTHERWISE ST A TEO, THE FINAL GRADING, INCLUOINC. NECESSARY IMPORT OR co <( > EXPORT 15 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CUSTOMER. 0 Cl w -:, 0 Cl II. STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ARE ADDRESS ANO PROJECT SPECIFIC ANO CAN NOT BE USED FOR FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT OR ADDRESS UNLESS WRITTEN PERMISSION IS PROVIDED BY SHEET ORIGINAL ENC.INEER OF RECORD. T-1 Agenda Attachment Item: 7h4. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Lister CUP Site Plan Date: January 10, 2024 Exhibits: This review is based on the following documents: 1.Site Plan for J. Brothers at 23615 Julie Ann Drive by W.Brown Land Surveying, Inc, dated 3/23/2023. Comments: 1.No impacts to public infrastructure are involved with the outbuilding construction. 2.Floodplain is shown at 1004 with proposed building at 1020. 3.Wetlands were reviewed and project has no impact. 4.Grading plan will be reviewed with building permit. End of Memo Agenda Attachment: 7h5. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-11 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran that the following Liquor License is granted effective for the dates as indicated, to the following Licensee, provided appropriate application and insurance documents are submitted and satisfactory background check completed by the Corcoran Police Department. LICENSEE LICENSE LICENSE EFFECTIVE DATE Corcoran Lions 9933 Trail Haven Road Corcoran, MN 55340 Corcoran Lions 9933 Trail Haven Road Corcoran, MN 55340 On-sale On-sale May 31-June 2, 2024 NTPA Tractor Pull Corcoran Lions Park August 23-25, 2024 NTPA Fall Tractor Pull Corcoran Lions Park Corcoran Lions 9933 Trail Haven Road On-sale September 6-8, 2024 Demo Derby Corcoran, MN 55340 Corcoran Lions Park VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February, 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Agenda Item: 7i. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes March 9, 2023 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on March 9, 2023, in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City Council meeting was held in person and the public was present in person and remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Vehrenkamp were present. City Administrator Beise, City Clerk Friedrich, Finance Manager Ung, Public Works Director Mattson, and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk were present. 1.Call to Order/Roll Call Mayor McKee called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor McKee invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Beise noted tabling item 7b to the March 23 Council meeting to allow for final review, the addition of item 10c City of Hanover Letter of Support for Project Funding, and 10d Request by Staff to Move Forward with Community Funding Project Request, and 10d Update on House File 2235. Council requested 9b be moved to 7f under the Consent Agenda. MOTION: by Bottema, seconded by Nichols, to move item 9b Approving Job Description and Appointment of Planning Technician to Consent Agenda item 7f. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 5:0) MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to approve the agenda as amended. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 5:0) 4.Commission Representatives Mayor McKee noted Planning Commissioner Brummond was present, and Parks and Trails Commissioner Wyffels was attending virtually. 5.Open Forum (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person or telephonically during Open Forum for items not included on the agenda. City Administrator Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. 6.Presentations/Recognitions a.Recognizing Brandon Heinz – 20 Years of Service Council recognized and thanked Brandon Heinz for his 20 years of service to the City of Corcoran. b.Resolution 2023-16 Honoring Parks and Trails Commissioner Sharon Meister MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to approve Resolution 2023-16 Honoring Sharon Meister for her service on the Parks and Trails Commission. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 5:0) c.Resolution 2023-17 Honoring Planning Commissioner Jim Shoulak MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to approve Resolution 2023-17 Honoring Jim Shoulak Added $JHQGD,WHP M for his service on the Planning Commission. 2 7. Consent Agenda a.2023-02-09 Draft Council Work Session Minutes b.2023-02-09 Draft Council Minutes (Tabled to March 23, 2023) c.Financial Claims d.MS4 Ordinance Update - Salt Storage e.Resolution 2023-18 and Agreement for State Transportation Fund Local Bridge f.ADDED: Approving Job Description and Appointment of Planning Technician (Moved from item 9b) Council requested item 7d be pulled for further discussion. MOTION: by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to approve agenda items 7a-c, and 7e-f, as presented. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 5:0) Council and staff discussed salt used on roads and finding a balance between being environmentally friendly while maintaining safe roads for travel. MOTION: by Schultz, seconded by Vehrenkamp to approve agenda item 7d as presented. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 5:0) 8. Planning Business 9. Unfinished Business - (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person or telephonically during the public comment opportunity for Unfinished Business. City Administrator Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. Planning Commissioner Corrine Brummond, 8985 Bechtold Road, opined on item 9d 2023 Goals and Measurables, and noted concern of a core strategy under measurable item 2, to create a financial and deployment plan for automatic license plate readers. Ms. Brummond questioned the legality on whether automatic license plate readers are an infringement on the Fourth Amendment right to have expectation of privacy while driving your vehicle, but expressed greater concern over data that is being collected about private residents who are not under suspicion, and why this goal is such a high priority for the City. Council and staff discussed the storage of data and accessibility, and the State of Minnesota data retention period for non-criminal activity regarding automatic license plate readers. Staff noted scenarios where automatic license plate readers would be beneficial and implementing more checks and balances for individual privacy for residents regarding automatic license plate readers. a.Hackamore Road Improvements - Approve Plans / Authorize Bids Jim Stremel, WSB, reviewed the status of the Hackamore Road Project. Mr. Stremel noted future development access points with future turn lanes, stormwater areas with adjacent developments, noted the future water main location, and trail extensions on the north side and extending through the whole corridor of the project. Mr. Stremel noted the next steps include advertising for bids as noted in the Council packet. Council and staff discussed infrastructure and preservation of water main location to efficiently install and minimize future impacts when the infrastructure is developed. MOTION: by McKee, seconded by Nichols to approve Resolution 2023-19 Plans and Specifications for the Hackamore Road Improvement Project and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 5:0) b.Approving Job Description and Appointment of Planning Technician Moved to Consent Agenda item 7f. c.NE Water Supply Treatment & Tower – Engineering Construction Administration Proposals MOTION: by Schultz, seconded by Bottema to approve the construction administration services for the NE Water Supply projects, including the water treatment facility in the amount of $768,620 and the storage (Motion carried 5:0) Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp tower in the amount of $338,940, for a project total of $1,107,560 as outlined in the proposals from Stantec. 3 d.2023 Goals and Measurables Council requested an adjustment to the Public Safety area regarding automatic license plate readers and place a pause on the deployment of automatic license plate readers from the Goals section until Council has an opportunity to evaluate funding and cost. Council noted review of legal aspects of Fourth Amendment. Council provided staff feedback regarding language change to both the short-term goal and change the measurable within the 2023 Goals and Measurables under Safety and Security within the Community. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Bottema, to adopt 2023 Goals and Measurables as amended. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 5:0) e.Utility Base Rate Discussion Council noted the high utility base rate charge and complaints received from some of the local businesses within the commerce district area of Corcoran. Council and staff discussed the evaluation method for utility base rate setup, fee structure differences, special assessments, and SAC residential equivalent units. Council noted eliminating the rebate credit form and issuing credits directly back to users. Council discussed replacement of infrastructure as it is consumed and distributing cost over the lifetime of the asset and collecting ahead to cover future cost of a 30-year lifespan of infrastructure. Council noted the misunderstanding in how SAC residential equivalent units would impact local business utility base rates when the fee schedule was last approved. Tom Gleason, Pro-Tech Auto Repair, 7591 Commerce Street, opined his business has previously paid SAC and WAC fees, as business owners did when the requirement came through for mandatory hookup by the City for water and sewer. Mr. Gleason opined the additional fees charged by Corcoran far exceed what Maple Grove charges the City for water. Council provided staff direction to review other methods to calculate utility base rates and bring back to Council for review, amend the fee schedule to reflect the new calculation method once approved, and issue credits to businesses affected where applicable as soon as possible. 10. New Business - (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person or telephonically during the public comment opportunity for New Business. City Administrator Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. a.Financial Assistance Request CJ Woodrow, Pitch to Pitch, thanked Council for their time, and noted comments from Council regarding options regarding financing and construction of a shared partnership through public financing opportunities. City Administrator Beise reviewed previous discussion of TIFF districts and tax abatement options. Council noted historically, Corcoran has not participated in a public/private financing partnership. Council noted the concept idea seems more of what private clubs would use rather than the public. Mr. Woodrow noted a future concept plan to present to Council and thanked Council for their input. b.Corcoran Locker Plant Site City Administrator Beise noted questions from Corcoran Locker Plant owners include would the City consider permitting on-site animal slaughtering as a permitted use and possible changes to the ordinance to allow continuing on-site slaughtering; or would the City consider acquiring the property as part of the adjacent City Park. Dan and Katie Goldman, 2925 Akola Avenue South, St. Louis Park, reviewed the business circumstances, and the possibilities of selling the business to another interested butcher shop, and the challenges with how Corcoran Locker Plant was set up as a business and the challenges to continue with the same business model regarding County and City ordinances. Council provided comments regarding Corcoran Locker and thanked the Goldman’s for their visit. c.Letter of Support – City of Hanover City Administrator Beise reviewed the request by the City of Hanover regarding House of Representative funding for projects at County Road 19 intersections at County Road 117/203, and County Road 123. (Motion carried 5:0) Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Vehrenkamp, to approve the Letter of Support to the City of Hanover regarding the City of Hanover’s application for Community Project Funding through the House of Representatives. 4 City Administrator Beise reviewed the recent notification from Representative Phillips regarding additional funding for a community project, and if Council would like to proceed, staff would recommend City Park as a project to seek additional funding for. Council and staff discussed timelines and bonds. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Bottema, to authorize staff to complete an application for Community Project Funding through the House of Representatives for City Park. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 5:0) e.Update on HF22345 Mayor McKee and City Administrator Beise noted the bill is related to legalizing affordable housing. Mayor McKee noted Council submitted a resolution supporting local control and decision-making. Mayor McKee outlined the House File 2235 has included provisions that would have implications for every city. Mayor McKee noted the House File 2235 has specific verbiage regarding development and could change Park Dedication fees among other fees, density changes from a minimum of four unites an acre to a minimum of eight units per acre and includes many other provisions such as no garage sizes and numerous other aesthetic mandates. Mayor McKee encouraged Council and residents to contact their representatives regarding House File 2235. 11. Staff Reports a.2022 Code Enforcement Report; Council received report. 12. 2023 City Council Schedule Council received schedule. 13. Adjournment MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:17 pm on March 9, 2023. Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk (Motion carried 5:0) d.Community Project Funding Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7j. Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Michelle Friedrich Topic Draft Regular Council Minutes – March 9, 2023 Action Required Informational Summary The draft Council Work Session and Regular Minutes for March 9, 2023 will be emailed on Tuesday, February 20, with hard copy provided to Council the evening of the February 22 meeting. Attachments (Hard copies will be provided February 22, 2024) 1. 2023-03-09 Draft Council Minutes STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7k. Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Director Matt Gottschalk Topic Police Canine Program Action Required Information Summary On December 18, 2023, Police Canine Zeke was retired from service. Zeke served the City of Corcoran and surrounding area from 2018-2023 resulting in 193 total deployments. These deployments were for 51 tracks, 117 drug searches, 14 officer safety incidents, 7 article searches, and 4 public safety events. Zeke was also a fixture in the community and a valued member of the City team. With Zeke’s departure the City should decide whether it intends to continue with the Canine Program. There is staff interest in continuing the program. This topic will be brought forward at a future Council meeting. If there is specific information that the Council would like to see to help make that decision please reach out to staff and let them know. Financial/Budget The cost of a new dog and handler training is approximately $17,500. There would also be approximately $2,000 in additional costs to prepare the dog and handler (vet visits and equipment). Staff believe that the City could likely receive $7,500 in grant money to offset some of the cost. The remaining $12,000 could be paid for from the City’s state public safety money allocated last December. There would also be 12 to 13 weeks of staff time for the new handler to attend training. Council Action Information only. Attachments None City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-12 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION HONORING POLICE CANINE ZEKE FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, does hereby find as follows: WHEREAS, Police Canine Officer Zeke served the City of Corcoran and surrounding areas from June 2018 to December 2023; and WHEREAS, Officer Zeke’s 193 deployments resulted in locating vulnerable individuals, fleeing subjects, and numerous drug crimes; and WHEREAS, Officer Zeke’s actions have helped the City of Corcoran maintain its status as one of the safest cities in Minnesota; and WHEREAS, effective December 18, 2024 2023, Officer Zeke retired from service; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Corcoran acknowledges the outstanding work done by Police Canine Officer Zeke in service to the Corcoran community and surrounding areas. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February, 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk REVISED Agenda Item: 7l. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-12 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION HONORING POLICE CANINE ZEKE FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, does hereby find as follows: WHEREAS, Police Canine Officer Zeke served the City of Corcoran and surrounding areas from June 2018 to December 2023; and WHEREAS, Officer Zeke’s 193 deployments resulted in locating vulnerable individuals, fleeing subjects, and numerous drug crimes; and WHEREAS, Officer Zeke’s actions have helped the City of Corcoran maintain its status as one of the safest cities in Minnesota; and WHEREAS, effective December 18, 2024, Officer Zeke retired from service; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Corcoran acknowledges the outstanding work done by Police Canine Officer Zeke in service to the Corcoran community and surrounding areas. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February, 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Agenda Item: 7l. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7m. Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Kathy Hughes Topic Conference Rooms Audio/Video Upgrade Action Required Approval Summary On October 26, 2023, staff brought forward to Council a request for approval the addition of webcams to City Hall’s two conference rooms. Currently, the ability to hold a video conference in the conference rooms does not exist. Council approved the webcam purchases on October 26, 2023, and the use of ARPA funds. Staff and our IT vendor did some further research and now recommend we purchase an all-in-one system that includes a webcam, speaker/microphone, and host capability. Costs for each conference room are as follows: Large Conference Room Logitech Rally Bar Mini Video Conferencing Camera $3,605.16 Small Conference Room Logitech Rally Bar Huddle $2,216.38 Financial/Budget The estimated cost for the project is $5,846.54 funded through ARPA. Recommendation Staff recommend proceeding with the purchase of all-in-one webcam systems for the conference rooms. Council Action 1. Authorize staff to proceed with the purchase of all-in-one webcam systems for the conference rooms. 2. Decline purchase of all-in-one webcam systems for the conference rooms. 3. Request staff to review other webcam systems for the conference rooms. Attachments 1. CIT Quote Logitech Rally Bars Agenda Attachment: 7m1. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Ash Hammerbeck, PE Steve Hegland, PE File: 227704426 Date: February 16, 2024 Reference: Change Order No. 1 – Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Council Action Requested Staff is recommending City Council approve Change Order #1 for the Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Project for the amount of $19,659.80. Summary Attached to this memo is Change Order No. 1 for the Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Project. This change order covers the modifications associated with Change Order Proposals 1, 2, and 3, attached to this memo. This is being processed to update the Contract Price to reflect the actual costs of work that has been completed. A description of the work covered under this change order is described below. Supporting documentation from the contractor is attached. COP#1 ·Description: This change proposal covers the labor and material costs associated with the modifications to the backwash pump, pipe, and fittings; the surge relief valve, pipe, and fittings; the recycle pump, pipe, and fittings; the baffle wall; and the future high service pump fitting. These process pipe changes were addressed under RFI#22 to accommodate the redesign of the intake structure, prevent cavitation conditions, and increase equipment efficiency. The cost of this item is $12,381.80. COP#2 ·Description: This change proposal covers the labor and material costs associated with the change in the finish paint of the overhead door. The west side of the building faces the main county road and incorporates several different doors to accommodate the use of the facility. This change order will incorporate custom painting of the overhead door to ensure all doors along the focal point of the facility are the same color and highlight this new facility. The cost of this item is $2,930.81. COP#3 ·Description: This change proposal covers the labor and material costs associated with the change to upsize the hatch for the backwash pump. The initially sized hatch did not allow the complete unit to be pulled through the clear opening due to the larger size of the backwash pump. A larger hatch will allow the complete pump assembly to be hoisted through the opening, ensuring safety and adequate equipment maintenance. The cost of this item is $4,347.19. Engineer’s Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council review and approve of the attached Change Order No. 1. Agenda Item: 7n. EJCDC® C-941, Change Order EJCDC® C-941, Change Order, Rev.1. Copyright© 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 2 CHANGE ORDER NO.: 1 Owner: City of Corcoran, Minnesota Owner’s Project No.: Engineer: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Engineer’s Project No.: 227704426 Contractor: Rice Lake Construction Group Contractor’s Project No.: 2305 Project: Water Treatment Plant Contract Name: City of Corcoran Water Treatment Plant Date Issued: 2/16/2024 Effective Date of Change Order: ____________ The Contract is modified as follows upon execution of this Change Order: Description: This change order covers the modifications associated with Change Order Proposal 1, 2 and 3 for the Water Treatment Plant Project. Attachments: 1. Change Order No. 1 Memo 2. Change Order Proposal 1 3. Change Order Proposal 2 4. Change Order Proposal 3 Change in Contract Price Change in Contract Times [State Contract Times as either a specific date or a number of days] Original Contract Price: Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion: December 31, 2024 $ 16,728,200.00 Ready for final payment: March 1, 2025 No previously approved Change Orders: No previously approved Change Orders: Substantial Completion: 0 days $ 0.00 Ready for final payment: 0 days Contract Price prior to this Change Order: Contract Times prior to this Change Order: Substantial Completion: December 31, 2024 $ 16,728,200.00 Ready for final payment: March 1, 2025 Increase this Change Order: Increase this Change Order: Substantial Completion: 0 days $ $19,659.80 Ready for final payment: 0 days Contract Price incorporating this Change Order: Contract Times with all approved Change Orders: Substantial Completion: December 31, 2024 $ 16,747,859.80 Ready for final payment: March 1, 2025 EJCDC® C-941, Change Order EJCDC® C-941, Change Order, Rev.1. Copyright© 2018 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 2 Recommended by Engineer Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Accepted by Contractor Rice Lake Construction Group By: Title: Date: By: Authorized by Owner City of Corcoran Title: Date: 2305 Corcoran WTP 22360 County Road 12, PO Box 517 1/22/2024 Deerwood, MN 56444 01 Process Pipe Changes HOURS $ RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ BW Pump Changes:-$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Non-returnable floor sleeve 1.00 ea -$ $0.00 707.14$ $707.14 -$ -$ 707.14$ New Floor sleeve 1.00 ea -$ $0.00 1,715.71$ $1,715.71 -$ -$ 1,715.71$ Return 20" 90 bends (2ea) & 20"x16" Reducer -1.00 ls 0.50 100.00$ $50.00 4,914.92$ ($4,914.92)-$ -$ (4,864.92)$ Restock on returbed fittings (35%)1.00 ls -$ $0.00 1,720.22$ $1,720.22 -$ -$ 1,720.22$ Add 20'x16" tee & 20"blind flange 1.00 ls -$ $0.00 4,325.20$ $4,325.20 -$ -$ 4,325.20$ Additional 20" DIP 1.00 ls 12.00 100.00$ $1,200.00 2,107.74$ $2,107.74 -$ -$ 3,307.74$ Surge Relief Changes:-$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Non-returnable floor sleeve 1.00 ea -$ $0.00 331.74$ $331.74 -$ -$ 331.74$ New Floor sleeve 1.00 ea -$ $0.00 337.14$ $337.14 -$ -$ 337.14$ Return 20"x12"tee, 2ea 12" 90 bends -1.00 ls 0.50 100.00$ $50.00 3,904.49$ ($3,904.49)-$ -$ (3,854.49)$ Restock on returned fittings (35%)1.00 ls -$ $0.00 1,366.57$ $1,366.57 -$ -$ 1,366.57$ Add 20"x8" tee & 2ea 8" 90 bends 1.00 ls -$ $0.00 3,218.05$ $3,218.05 -$ -$ 3,218.05$ 8" isolation valve 1.00 ea -$ $0.00 970.00$ $970.00 -$ -$ 970.00$ Recycle Pump Changes:-$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Non-returnable wall pipe 1.00 ea -$ $0.00 605.75$ $605.75 -$ -$ 605.75$ 10" core-drill 1.00 ea 1.00 100.00$ $100.00 -$ $0.00 595.00$ -$ 695.00$ New FLxFL Suction Pipe 1.00 ea -$ $0.00 468.82$ $468.82 -$ -$ 468.82$ Linkseals/waterproofing/grouting 1.00 ls 2.00 100.00$ $200.00 315.00$ $315.00 -$ -$ 515.00$ 918.00 Deck floor sleeve 1.00 ea -$ $0.00 198.75$ $198.75 -$ -$ 198.75$ Baffle Wall Changes:-$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ 12" core-drill 3.00 ea 1.00 100.00$ $100.00 -$ $0.00 1,590.00$ -$ 1,690.00$ Future HSP ARV Sleeves:-$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Floor sleeve 2.00 ea 2.00 100.00$ $200.00 205.71$ $411.42 -$ -$ 611.42$ -$ $0.00 $0.00 -$ -$ -$ 20" BW Waste Fitting (Change from S/O TEE to regular TEE)-1.00 ea -$ $0.00 5,358.00$ ($5,358.00)-$ -$ (5,358.00)$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Additional Freight Charges 1.00 LS -$ $0.00 1,550.65$ $1,550.65 -$ -$ 1,550.65$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Misc. Small Tools and Mat'l 5% of Labor 1.00 ea 5.00%95.00$ Sales Tax 1.00 ea 8.525%526.21$ Totals 19.00$ 1,900.00$ 6,172.49$ 2,185.00$ -$ 10,878.70$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Subs (5%)109.25$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Labor, Material, and Equipment (15%)1,210.87$ Bond and Insurance Cost (1.5%)182.98$ Total Change Order Proposal Request 12,381.80$ Days Requested 1 RLCG PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: COP: CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL MATERIAL SUBCONTRACTOR TOTAL EQUIPMENT TOTAL LINE TOTALDESCRIPTIONQTYUNITLABOR 2 Date: Letting Date: Prepared By: County: Project: Location: RATE QTY TOTAL 595 1 595.00 405 3 1,215.00 375 1 Ea.375.00 - - 2,185.00 2,185.00 *CENTRAL MINNESOTA SAWING LLC WILL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL CONCRETE SLURRY AT NO ADDITIONAL COST *CENTRAL MINNESOTA SAWING LLC IS WOMAN-OWNED AND DBE Corcoran MN **SAWING MOBILIZATIONS WILL BE CHARGED PER CALL** **QUOTE IS ASSUMING ALL HOLES WILL BE AVAILABLE UPON ONE MOBILIZATION** *RATE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IF THE CONDITIONS AND/OR CLIENT'S REQUIREMENTS DIFFER FROM THE ORIGINAL PLANS Terms & Instructions *STANDBY TIME WILL BE CHARGED AT A RATE OF $120 PER PERSON/1 HOUR STARTING AT 30 MINUTES DUE TO JOBSITE CONDITIONS THAT WOULD PREVENT US FROM PERFORMING THE WORK LISTED ABOVE **THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL MOB CHARGED IF WORK IS NOT AVAILABLE UPON MOBILIZATION (APPLIES TO LUMP SUM MOBS) *ADDITIONAL INCIDENTAL WORK OUTSIDE OF THIS QUOTE IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PRICE **CENTRAL MINNESOTA SAWING LLC IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TRAFFIC CONTROL Ea. *THIS QUOTE IS NOT GOOD FOR OVERNIGHT WORK (RATE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED UPON PROJECT) Thank you for your business! For questions, please email estimating@cmsawing.com Core Drill 12" Hole (8" Depth) Mobilization Central Minnesota Sawing LLC Unit Core Drill 10" Hole (1'4" Depth)Ea. DESCRIPTION Project Information 10975 37th St, Clear Lake MN 55319 estimating@cmsawing.com 1/11/2024 (320)743-2001 Maddy Ogg New Water Treatment Plant 2305 Corcoran WTP 22360 County Road 12, PO Box 517 2/7/2024 Deerwood, MN 56444 02 Overhead Door Custom Color HOURS $ RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Doorco Proposal 1.00 LS -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 2,750.00$ -$ 2,750.00$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Misc. Small Tools and Mat'l 5% of Labor 1.00 ea 5.00%-$ Sales Tax 1.00 ea 8.525%-$ Totals -$ -$ -$ 2,750.00$ -$ 2,750.00$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Subs (5%)137.50$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Labor, Material, and Equipment (15%)-$ Bond and Insurance Cost (1.5%)43.31$ Total Change Order Proposal Request 2,930.81$ Days Requested 1 MATERIAL SUBCONTRACTOR TOTAL EQUIPMENT TOTAL LINE TOTALDESCRIPTIONQTYUNITLABOR RLCG PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: COP: CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL 2 DOORCO 4871 Rice Lake Rd. T: 218-349-3715 Duluth, MN 55803 F: 218-461-3715 C.O. # 1 DATE: September 18, 2023 REVISED DATE: February 6, 2024 PROJECT: CORCORAN WATER TREATMENT PLANT SECTION: 08 36 13 UPWARD ACTING SECTIONAL DOORS ADDENDA ______________________________________________________________________________________ DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ORIGINAL BID: (1)10’-2” X 10’ CLOPAY 3722, 20 GAUGE GALVANIZED STEEL , INSULATED R-18, NO WINDOWS, 3” REVERSE ANGLE TRACK, STANDARD LI FT, SAFETY BOTTOM, COMMERCIAL PHOTO EYES, 100,000 CYCLE TORSION SPRINGS, STANDARD COLOR, CLIP-ON WEATHER SEALS. (1) 10’ LIFTMASTER T501 L5 HEAVY-DUTY COMMERCIAL TROLLEY OPERATORWITH A STANDARD 3-BUTTON CONTROL STATION AND (2) REMOTECONTROLS.FURNISH AND INSTALL (1) NEW DOOR WITH (1) NEW OPERATOR. INCLUDES ALL PARTS AND LABOR. FOR CUSTOM COLOR (SHERWIN-WILLIAMS SEALSKIN 7675) ADD $2,750.00 “ALL UNION LABOR” “ALL ELECTRICAL BY OTHERS” BID PER AVAILABLE PLANS AND SPEC’S FURNISH AND INSTALL COMPLETE ON PREPARED OPENINGS ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR GUARANTEED AS SPECIFIED PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE 2305 Corcoran WTP 22360 County Road 12, PO Box 517 2/7/2024 Deerwood, MN 56444 03 Upsize BW Pump Roof Hatch HOURS $ RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Roof Tech Proposal 1.00 LS -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 4,079.00$ -$ 4,079.00$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ $0.00 -$ $0.00 -$ -$ -$ Misc. Small Tools and Mat'l 5% of Labor 1.00 ea 5.00%-$ Sales Tax 1.00 ea 8.525%-$ Totals -$ -$ -$ 4,079.00$ -$ 4,079.00$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Subs (5%)203.95$ Rice Lake Mark-up on Labor, Material, and Equipment (15%)-$ Bond and Insurance Cost (1.5%)64.24$ Total Change Order Proposal Request 4,347.19$ Days Requested 1 RLCG PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: COP: CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL MATERIAL SUBCONTRACTOR TOTAL EQUIPMENT TOTAL LINE TOTALDESCRIPTIONQTYUNITLABOR 2 1Matt Messerly From:Michael Sederstrom <michaels@rooftech.com> Sent:Monday, January 29, 2024 3:13 PM To:Matt MesserlySubject:Re: Equipment Access Roof Hatch Corcoran WTP Caution: This email originated from outside the organization . Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Matt, I got pricing back for a 5’x5’ with a clear opening of 55”x57.125”. The total add price for this would be $4,079.00. He didn’t give me an option for a 48” x X” as we discussed. I tried to reach him to find out if that isn’t an option or why he didn’t provide the option but haven’t heard back. If I do hear something on that I will provide you with the option but felt it best to provide you with what I know as of now. If this will work and you want to move forward with it please let me know. Thank you, Mike Sent from my iPhone On Jan 25, 2024, at 2:19 PM, Matt Messerly <matt_messerly@ricelake.org> wrote: THINK BEFORE YOU CLICK: This email originated outs ide the organization. Do not click links or attachments unless you know the content is safe. Hi Mike, I made a mistake on the pump dimension; it’s actually 43.75” diameter. So, we need an absolute clear opening that is at least 45” x 45” minimum to accommodate that. Sorry for the misinformation. Thank you for helping us find a hatch that will work. Matt Messerly Project Manager Rice Lake Construction Group Cell: 218-670-1937 www.ricelake.org A Water Resources Group Company Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Steve Hegland, PE Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Project/File: File Date: February 20, 2024 Subject: Lead Service Line Inventory – MDH Grant Proposal Council Action Requested Staff are requesting the City Council review and authorize Stantec to submit the attached scope of service to the MDH to assist with the inventory of the water services within the community. The proposed contract for services is to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) to allow Stantec to perform work in developing the Lead Service Line Inventory on behalf of the City of Corcoran. This proposal of $18,077 is contracted directly with MDH at no cost to the City for consulting services. Background In December 2021 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR) were in effect to reduce the risk of lead in drinking water. The EPA directed States and water system providers to conduct and submit service line inventories to identify the individual water services within the community and document their material, namely looking for lead and galvanized water services. With this, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has provided limited grant funds to communities to assist with the inventory of these systems, which Corcoran is now eligible for. With the grant program, Stantec will be contracted directly with MDH to perform the initial inventory assistance work on behalf of the City. There will be limited staff time involved with developing this inventory with the majority of the work performed by Stantec through the grant funding. In developing this inventory, we will create a GIS database to document the properties within the Corcoran water service area and catalog the location and materials for all of the services. Creating the inventory in GIS and building out the necessary informational databases will allow for the system to efficiently expanded in the future and also can be combined with the existing city utility database which are already in the GIS system. Added Agenda Item: 7o. Scope of Work Contract No. 2312A For City of Corcoran Lead Service Line Inventory GENERAL In December 2021 the Environmental Protecon Agency (EPA) announced Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR) were in effect to reduce lead in drinking water. EPA directed states and public water system providers to conduct and submit lead service line inventories to idenfy the individual water services within the community and document their condion. This scope of work describes services to assist the City of Corcoran in conducng a lead service line (LSL) inventory. Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) defines three work categories under the master contract: ·Category A: Records review for inventory development ·Category B: Visual inspection for inventory development ·Category C: Development of LSL Replacement Plan The service line material informaon gathered during Category A and Category B will be used to create the LSL Inventory submission to MDH. Compleon of Category C requires submi1al of LSL Replacement Plan to MDH. This scope of work and budget covers category A and B (excluding exterior invesgaons). SCHEDULE LSL Inventory ·Draft Inventory: July 15, 2024 ·Final Inventory: August 30, 2024 ·Public 30-day Notification of LSL Inventory Results: September 9, 2024 ·Submittal to Mn Dept of Health (MDH): October 9, 2024 TASKS, ITEMS AND WORK PRODUCTS Task 1 – Project Management Stantec is responsible for the management and coordinaon of the work defined herein. Management measures to be provided include the following: ·Monthly invoicing that complies with MDH’s contracting requirements ·Maintenance of project files ·Regular communication with the client regarding progress and budget by email. ·Development and monitoring of project schedule. Deliverables: ·Monthly invoicing ·Monthly reporting of work status with invoicing Task 2 – Records Review The City of Corcoran has a minimum of 985 service lines. Stantec will collaborate with the City of Corcoran to review the available service lines records for the lines which may include: ·Metering or billing account information ·Watermain and service construction and repair records and specifications ·Plumbing permits ·Inspection records ·Meter replacement records ·Tap/tie cards ·Ordinances regarding lead in service lines ·Assessor’s property information ·Other pertinent records Supporng service line material determinaon records will be uploaded into GIS database tailored to the City, based on MDH’s templates. A filing system based on a unique idenfier for each service line may be developed to temporarily store record copies of not directly uploaded into GIS database. Deliverables: ·Population of GIS database with records supporting service line material determination. Assump2ons: ·The budget assumes that the records for 985 services will be reviewed and documented by Stantec. Task 3 – GIS Database Stantec will develop an ArcGIS web applicaon as the plaCorm to: ·Load existing data into GIS. ·Allow collection of service line information in the field. ·Allow customers to submit service line records and photos. Deliverables: ·Lead Service Inventory Solution populated with record information and configured to share information with the community. ·LSL Inventory GIS database submitted to MDH Billing Rate $200.00 $200.00 $130.00 $140.00 $140.00 $115.00 $140.00 $140.00 $140.00 Job Classification Project Manager Quality Control Project Manager Field Tech Engineer 1 Engineer 1 Admin Assistant GIS Tech GIS Tech Communications Task Steven Hegland Erik Peters Adam Noreen Nick Wyers Caleb Kroeze Kate Nelson Jordan Schuck Katy Berglund TBD Project Management 8 4 Records Review 4 2 4 4 2 GIS Database 4 4 2 8 8 2 50 10 2 Total Scoped Hours 16 10 2 12 12 2 52 10 2 Compensation $3,200.00 $2,000.00 $260.00 $1,680.00 $1,680.00 $230.00 $7,280.00 $1,400.00 $280.00 Subtotal Hourly Compensation Milage (100 Miles @ $0.67/Mile) Total Budget $18,010.00 $67.00 $18,077.00 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7o. Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Kevin Mattson Topic Lead Service Line Inventory – Engagement Request (Minnesota Department of Health) Action Required Approval Summary A staff report related to the Lead Service Line Inventory – Engagement Request from the Minnesota Department of Health, will be emailed on Tuesday, February 20, 2024 with a hard copy provided to Council the evening of the February 22, 2024 meeting. Attachments (Hard copies will be provided February 22, 2024) 1. Staff Report STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7p. Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Jay Tobin Topic Current City of Corcoran Organization Chart Action Required Approval Summary In recognition of the need for clarity and common understanding regarding the organizational structure for all City of Corcoran operations, staff attempted to capture authorized positions, contracts, and an appropriate hierarchy. The “current organizational chart” reflects the present organization as approved and or directed by City Council and which is supported in and through the 2024 budget. Staff continues to review emerging requirements, evaluate potential efficiencies, mitigate and eliminate deficiencies, and propose appropriate organizational changes as needed. As the staff assesses future needs, they will ensure proposed alternatives and requested changes are presented and discussed in and through the 2025 budget process. Financial/Budget Personnel and contracts reflected in the “current organization chart” as presented are approved in the 2024 budget. Recommendation Staff recommend approving the “current organization chart” as presented. Council Action 1. Approve the “current organization chart” as presented. 2. Decline approval of the “current organization chart” as presented. 3.Amend the “current organization chart” as presented and approve the amended chart. 4.Provide staff direction regarding changes to the “current organization chart”. Attachments 1. Current Organization Chart. City Council Administrative Assistant Finance Manager (2Q 2024) Communications Assistant (FT -- 4Q 2024) Recreation Supervisor Administration Public Works Public Safety City of Corcoran Organization Chart (as of 2.15.2024) Accounting Clerk Public Works Director Election Judges Accountant Administrative Services Director City Administrator Commissions (Charter, Planning Parks & Trails,) City Attorney City Clerk Information Technology (Contract) Rink Attendants Summer Seasonal Planner Operations Superintendent Planning/Code Enforcement (Contract) Planning Technician Operations Supervisor Crew Leader Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker (1Q 2024) Summer Maintenance (0.5 FTE) Snowplow Operator (0.2 FTE) Engineering Development Superintendent (2Q 2024) Engineering Services (Contract) Construction Services Supervisor Utility Superintendent (2Q 2024) Utility Maintenance Worker (3Q 2024) Building Inspections (Contract) Permit Technician Public Safety Director Office Manager Administrative Assistant Police Officer Police Officer Sergeant Sergeant Police Officer Police Officer Police Officer Police Officer Police Officer (1Q 2024) Police Officer (1Q 2024) Police Officer Public Safety Deputy Director Detective Community Service Officer (Goes away 3Q 2024) Police Officer Police Officer Police Officer Police Officer Police Officer Police Officer Police Officer Solid: Full-time Dark with Dots: NOT FILLED Solid with Dots: Part-time Solid with Lines: Contract Solid with Stripes: Reserves Information Technology Manager (3Q 2024) Maintenance Worker (1Q 2024) Transition: Retirement or PT to FT Chart Key Fire/EMS Services (Contracts) Finance Manager: (Contract) Emergency Management Services (Contracts) Administrative Assistant Assessments: (Contract) Community Service Officer (FT – 3Q 2024) Police Officer Park Planning (Contract) STAFF REPORT Added Agenda Item: 7q. Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Kevin Mattson Topic Public Works Facility Fund Closeout Action Required Approval Summary There is an existing balance of approximately $49,540.89 that remains in the Public Works Facility project fund. Back in November 2019, in an effort to close out the project, staff completed a review of the facility needs and identified a plan to allocate the remaining funds towards other facility improvements. The two improvements that staff recommended were to upgrade the fire panel with a transfer switch and the installation of a concrete footing and pavement flatwork in the outside storage lean-to. The Council previously approved the fire panel upgrades which have since been completed. As requested, staff reviewed the landscape screening for outside storage and verified that it met city code/ordinances at the time of approval. Presently, the ground surface for this outside storage area is gravel. Staff uses this area for rack/shelving storage for equipment, materials, and other supplies and the uneven surface poses a safety concern. The work is scheduled to be completed in the next 2-3 weeks. Financial/Budget Staff is requesting authorization to direct the remaining fund balance in the amount of $49,540.89 to complete concrete footings and pavement flatwork for the lean-to structure. Expenses will cover the material costs and rentals associated with this work. Staff has coordinated assistance from neighboring public works departments to self- perform the installation to maximize the remaining funding. Recommendation Approve the remaining Public Works Facility fund balance in the amount of $49,540.89 to complete concrete footings and pavement flatwork for the lean-to structure. Council Action Consider a motion to approve the remaining Public Works Facility fund balance in the amount of $49,540.89 to complete concrete footings and pavement flatwork for the lean-to structure. Page 2 Attachments 1.Agenda Item 10a. Public Works Facility Closeout_11-25-2019 2.Agenda Item 7a. 2019-11-25 Draft Council Meeting Minutes_12-12-2019 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10a. Council Meeting: November 25, 2019 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson Topic: Public Works Facility Closeout Action Required: Approval Summary: There is an existing balance of approximately $101,000 that remains in the Public Works Facility project fund after the floor settling repairs were completed. In an effort to close out the project, staff completed a review of the current facility needs and has developed a plan to invest the remaining funds into the facility. The two primary improvements that staff recommends completing are upgrading to a fire panel with a transfer switch and installing concrete pavement flooring in the outside storage lean-to. The first priority of upgrading the fire panel with a transfer switch is necessary to provide the building with a fully functional fire suppression system. The transfer switch was never installed in the fire panel. Presently, if the power goes out to the building, which is not an uncommon occurrence as the facility is at the very end of the utility provider’s 3- phase power grid, the fire pump goes out as a result of a lack of backup power generation. Additionally, this results in routine false alarms for power failure to the loca l fire department/emergency responders and likely insurance coverage implications if we knowingly do not address the issue. Staff has previously pursued a variance from state building officials for other alternatives related to the addition of the transfer switch but has been told it will not be approved. The second priority is to install a concrete pavement flooring in the lean-to. Currently, the ground surface for this outside storage area is gravel. Staff uses this area for rack/shelving storage for equipment, materials, and other supplies and the uneven surface poses a safety concern. Staff plans to coordinate with other neighboring public works departments to self- perform the concrete pavement flooring work to maximize the remaining funding. If after completing the above-mentioned priorities and funding exists, staff proposes to close in the outside storage bays to help further protect the department’s assets. Added Agenda Item: 7q1. Page 2 Financial/Budget: Estimated costs for the two priority improvements are itemized below. •Upgraded fire panel with a transfer switch is estimated at $50,425. o Miscelleanous costs to relocate existing tanks and concrete pads are estimated at $5,000. •Installation of concrete pavement flooring to cover materials and equipment/supplies is estimated at $45,575 (remaining funds after fire panel updgrade). The project improvements would be capped at the remaining funds available in the Public Works Facility fund. Recommendation: Authorize staff to allocate the remaining Public Works Facility fund balance towards the facility improvements of upgrading the fire panel with a transfer switch and installing concrete pavement flooring in the outside storage lean-to in that order. Council Action: Consider a motion to authorize staff to allocate the remaining Public Works Facility fund balance towards the facility improvements of upgrading the fire panel with a transfer switch and installing concrete pavement flooring in the outside storage lean-to in that order. Attachments: 1.Quote – Fire Panel with Transfer Switch CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes November 25, 2019 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on November 25, 2019 at City Hall in Corcoran, Minnesota. Present were Mayor Thomas, Councilor Schultz, Councilor Bottema, Councilor Dejewski, and Councilor Keefe. Also present were City Administrator Martens, Administrative Services Director Beise, City Attorney Thames, Public Works Director Mattson, and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor Thomas called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Thomas invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Martens asked that agenda item 7c. Tobacco License be added to agenda. MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Schultz to approve the agenda as modified. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) Council asked for clarification of business sale and of applicant for the Tobacco License application. Administrative Services Director Beise noted the sale date was prior to the next Council meeting. 4.Commission Representatives Mayor Thomas noted Planning Commissioner Vehrenkamp and Parks and Trails Commissioner Christenson were present. The Commissioners were invited to speak on items related to their respective commissions. 5.Open Forum Mayor Thomas invited residents to speak. No residents came forward to speak. 6.Presentations/Recognitions 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of November 14, 2019 Council Meeting b.Financial Claims c.Tobacco License MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Bottema to approve the consent agenda as presented. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) 8.Planning Business a.Adopting the 2040 Comprehensive Plan City Administrator Martens cited the adoption and resolution of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. City Administrator Martens thanked the Council, staff, and the Corcoran community for resident participation. Council and staff discussed final copy distribution options , and notification to owners of rezoned properties. Council also discussed submission of comprehensive plans and the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Council. Agenda Item 7a. Added Agenda Item: 7q2. 2 MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Schultz to approve Resolution 2019-79 Adopting the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) 9. Unfinished Business No unfinished business was presented. 10. New Business a. Public Works Facility Closeout With the resolution of the floor settling issue at the Public Works facility, Public Works Director Mattson reviewed the facility fund balance, and requested allocation of the remaining fund balance be utilized for two improvements at the Public W orks facility. Public Works Director Mattson presented the requested items to Council and include a necessary upgrade to the fire panel to add a transfer switch for backup power generation, and a safety improvement of adding asphalt or a concrete slab within the outside lean-to building at the Public Works facility. Council and staff reviewed why the backup power for the fire panel was not installed during construction of the facility in 2013-2014. Staff and Council addressed the history of the construction of the Public Works facility. Council inquired if additional concrete and elect rical bids are being requested for the project, and if asphalting would be a more logical cost option than concrete for the lean-to building. Public Works Director Mattson confirmed the Public W orks facility is paved with asphalt outside of the facility with a fence around the perimeter of facility operations. Council discussed the importance of compliance with the City’s ordinances regarding landscape screening for outdoor storage at the Public Works facility. Council questioned the bond status of the facility fund balance, and if remaining funds could be utilized for repairs, other needs, or to paydown interest on the bonds. Council asked if concrete was necessary for the entire area within the lean-to building, or if a specific concreted area of the lean-to building was acceptable if used for supply storage needs. Council and staff discussed the fire panel and the transfer switch issue and the number of false alarms that have occurred. Council inquired about items stored in the lean-to building, and if the items are seasonal equipment and supplies, or yearly equipment and supplies. Council discussed if asphalt would be a better cost-savings use of the remaining facility fund balance. City Administrator Martens clarified the improvements outlined above would be included within a future Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and bonding if the projects are not completed as part of the project close out. MOTION: made by Dejewski, seconded by Bottema authorizing staff to proceed in order of priority as follows, and includes the upgrade to the fire panel at the Public W orks facility, to review the current landscape screening for outside storage at the Public W orks facility, to upgrade landscape screening so it is compliant with the City code ordinance, and to review additional options pertaining to asphalt or concrete paving options within the lean-to building. Voting Aye: Bottema, Dejewski, and Keefe Voting Nay: Thomas and Schultz. (Motion carried 3:2) b. 2019 Code Enforcement Update and 2020 Code Enforcement Priorities Administrative Services Director Beise reviewed the 2019 proactive code enforcement directive, the number of violations, and the status of the violations. Administrative Services Director Beise reviewed code compliance options for the remainder of 2019 and priorities for 2020. Council discussed 2020 priorities for code enforcement. City Administrator Martens 3 clarified the reason for establishing code enforcement priorities now with CUP and IUP research is to utilize funds for code enforcement through the end of 2019 budget. Council addressed the focus on home occupation businesses should be for notification of fire and safety requirements for home-based businesses within Corcoran. Council discussed street signs for home-based businesses and the impact of state regulations. Council discussed campaign signs and noxious weeds as a low or high-priority for code compliance in 2020. Council discussed Maple Hill Estates code compliance violation monitoring and remaining a priority in the spring of 2020. Administrative Services Director Beise clarified there are five remaining code violations of 70 in Maple Hills Estates, and code compliance will remain a priority in 2020. Council inquired about laws or changes in state status that need to be reflected within the City codes and ordinances, and what thresholds or criteria exist for home-based businesses within statute. City Administrator Martens indicated the process of CUP and IUP permitting could include reviewing requirements prior to issuance by the City. Council and staff discussed maintaining a resident complaint-based code enforcement action regarding home- based businesses versus the proactive approach to code compliance violations. Per consensus, staff was provided direction to move forward with the remaining 2019 code enforcement priorities, and Council will finalize code enforcement priorities for 2020 at the goal setting session. c. 2025 Staff Planning City Administrator Martens outlined an internal 2025 staff planning forecast based on growth from new housing developments within the City. City Administrator Martens reviewed assumptions in residential planning and projections for single family home permits through 2025 with an anticipated city population of 8,290. City Administrator Martens noted there is an insufficient number of staff positions to keep up with the significant population growth. City Administrator Martens indicated the 2025 staff planning item is for discussion purposes only and future city services needs will impact staffing recommendations. Cit y Administrator Martens noted staff will incorporate the 2025 staff planning forecast into the five-year financial management plan for Council review. Council asked about the outsourced staff and full-time staff forecast numbers relating to future city services and tax base. City Administrator Martens noted the importance of the planning exercise to help refine the priorities of services the City will offer based on population growth. d. Resolution Authorizing Entry City Administrator Martens explained the Resolution Authorizing Entry for purposes of testing, surveying and boring activities located at the Gleason Parkways road access to County Road 116, the process of negotiating right of entry to support the needs of greater Corcoran, and authorizing staff to seek entry for the purposes stated. City Administrator noted staff has met with the three property owners and will continue to work with owners regarding access and right of entry. City Attorney Thames outlined the legal purpose of the Resolution as a perfunctory action to move forward formally with a court order if the City is not able to obtain the requisite permission. Council inquired about the concerns being presented to property owners. City Administrator Martens discussed concerns included the future impacts to property owners, usability of the property with easement adjustments, and future value to properties such as city sewer and water access on the property. Council inquired about financial concerns if land is taken by the City from the property owner. City Attorney Thames explained if any land is taken, the owner would be compensated for the land. City Attorney Thames also noted there is a level cooperation needed by all parties at the front end of the process regarding what land is needed, 4 what the best route is and what is feasible, and the Resolution with Council endorsement required by state statute allows for the pre-formal process to figure logistics, what will work best financially to continue, and what will not work, in the absence of the level of cooperation between parties. Council clarified that eminent domain should be a last resort by government. City Attorney Thames concurred with Council’s statement regarding eminent domain. City Attorney Thames noted eminent domain would always be a last resort and is a process that is in place when no other feasible options are present. City Administrator Martens referenced an example of the greater good for the City of Corcoran in the feasibility studies relating to sewer and water in the Gleason Parkway area discussed, and the costs associated with constructing numerous lift stations to push sewer versus systems that utilize gravity, highlighting lift stations are more costly, and in this scenario would affect more property owners, than the systems that utilize gravity for providing city sewer. Council asked if Resolution approval signifies eminent domain by the City. City Attorney Thames explained by approving the Resolution the Council is approving staff to pursue what the proper path would be moving forward, and allows for continued collaboration with the property owners, to determine what needs to be done. Council discussed the positive and negative aspects of utilizing eminent domain, both from a City perspective and a property owner perspective, regarding planning and development of the City. MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Schultz to approve Resolution 2019-80 Authorizing Entry for Purposes of Testing, Surveying, Boring or Other Similar Activities. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) a. City Administrator Performance Evaluation Distribution City Administrator Martens indicated the City Administrator Performance Evaluation due date of December 9, 2019, and Administrative Services Director Beise will follow up with Council in collection of the evaluation. 11. Staff Reports a. Active Corcoran Planning Applications. Report received. b. Five-Year Financial Management Plan Status Update City Administrator Martens reviewed the significant updates to the financial plan and suggested a work session to review the document prior to approval. Council called for a work session to be held on February 13, 2020, at 5:00 pm to review the Five-year Financial Management Plan. 12. Closed Session a. Consider an Offer for the Purchase of Real Estate at 8200 County Road 116 Mayor Thomas stated: “Under the authority of Minn. Stat. 13D.05 Subd. 3(c)(3), the City is permitted to close a meeting to consider offers and counter offers for the purchase or sale of real or personal property. The City Council is now going into closed session to consider an offer for the sale of real estate; the following property is the subject of the closed meeting: 8200 County Road 116.” Mayor Thomas recessed the Council meeting at 8:34 pm. Mayor Thomas reconvened the Council meeting at 9:00 pm. “In closed session, the City Council discussed an offer for real estate; staff was provided direction.” 5 13. 2019 City Council Schedule City Administrator Martens outlined the upcoming agenda items, and the upcoming Wessel EAW neighborhood open house meeting on December 5, 2019. 14. Adjournment MOTION: made by Keefe, seconded by Bottema to adjourn. Voting Aye: Thomas, Bottema, Dejewski, Keefe and Schultz. (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 9:01 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk This message was sent from outside of the organization. Please do not click links or open attachments unless yourecognize the source of this email and know the content is safe. From:Cade Eisenzimmer To:Michelle Friedrich Subject:Hope development public comment Date:Thursday, February 22, 2024 10:31:19 AM I reviewed the agenda for the meeting regarding the Hope development and am troubled by several areas. We are talking about high density mixed use infrastructure that not even downtown Corcoran has seen. Corcoran has always been about smart growth. This project seems to be about squeezing as much humanly possible out of a small and oddly shaped 40 acres. That is not what Corcoran has been about for my 43 years living here. This intersection is tremendously busy with lines of traffic morning and night. I find it hard to believe entrance and exit so close to a major intersection is safe and logistically feasible. Please rethink this application to see if it’s in the best interest of existing Corcoran residents. Why dont we start with something like this in downtown Corcoran and see how well it works before force-fitting this into an oddly shaped piece of property. Let’s not forget the applicant is a former City Council member. Cade Eisenzimmer 21025 Oakdale Drive Corcoran, MN 55734 Public Comment for Agenda Item: 8a. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 1 of 10 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR “HOPE MINISTRIES” LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 116 AND COUNTY ROAD 30 (PID 11-119-23-14-0003, 11-119-23-14-0004, 11-119-23-14-0005, AND 11-119-23-11-0012) (CITY FILE NO. 23-028) WHEREAS, Hope Community Church, Brain and Jacque Lother, and Corcoran Investments LLC, (the “applicant”) has requested approval of “Hope Ministries” a mixed-use subdivision on the property legally described as: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the Corcoran City Council hereby approves the request for preliminary PUD plan, subject to the following conditions: 1.A preliminary planned unit development (PUD) plan is approved for “Hope Ministries”, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on October 20, 2023, and revisions received November 27, 2023, January 12, 2024, January 25, 2024, and January 30, 2024, except as amended by this resolution. 1.The preliminary PUD plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the PUD standards in the ordinance. 2.Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning and preliminary plat (Ordinance 2024-513 and Resolution 2024-17). 2.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Public Safety memo dated December 6, 2023. 3.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo for civil review dated January 24, 2024. 4.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo for stormwater review dated January 24, 2024. 5.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the July 27, 2023, EAW Record of Decision. 6.The applicant is subject to review and approval by Hennepin County. The applicant is required to secure all permits and approvals from the County. The applicant will continue to work with City staff to comply with requirements from the Hennepin County memo dated December 28, 2023. REVISED Agenda Attachment Item: 8a5. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 2 of 10 7. The applicant will continue to work with City staff and Three Rivers Park District to finalize the necessary trail easements and location as well as comply with requirements from the Three Rivers Park District’s memo dated January 5, 2024. 8. All uses identified in the P-I zoning district (allowed, accessory, conditional, interim, or administrative permit) are permitted on Lot 1, Block 1. a. The noted future cemetery expansion will require a site plan to be submitted as a final PUD plan. 9. Except for Lot 1, Block 1, all uses identified in the General Mixed Use (GMU) and Downtown Mixed Use zoning districts shall be permitted in this PUD. a. Shared parking for Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5 of Block 5 is approved. b. Two principal buildings on Lot 2, Block 1 are approved. 10. PUD flexibility is granted for the following: a. Development in advance of City services (water) being available to serve the project. A building permit will not be issued until Corcoran municipal water is operational. b. Reduced building setback along County Road 116 and County Road 30 of 50 feet with enhanced landscaping where 60’ with enhanced landscaping is required. c. The following lot standards apply to the commercial and multi-family buildings within Block 5 of the preliminary plat: Minimum Lot Area 25,000 square feet Minimum Lot Width 150 feet Minimum Lot Depth N/A Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks - Front, Major Roadways 50 feet with enhanced landscaping per Section 1060.070, Subd. 2(K) - Front, Other Streets 25 feet - Side and Rear None Maximum Principal Building Height - The commercial buildings cannot exceed 2-stories. - 50 foot maximum at the required setback for Lot 1 and Lot 6 of Block 5 Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage 80% d. The following standards apply to the detached “villas”: Minimum Lot Area 5,285 square feet City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 3 of 10 Minimum Lot Width 44 feet Minimum Lot Depth N/A Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks - Front, Major Roadways 100 feet - Front, Other Streets 25 feet - Side 7.5 feet - Rear 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet e. The following standards apply to the attached “villas” and “rowhomes”: Attached Villas Townhomes Minimum Lot Area 14,500 square feet per unit 4,500 square feet per unit Minimum Lot Width N/A N/A Minimum Lot Depth N/A N/A Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks - Front, Major Roadways N/A 50 feet measured from the front lot line of the base lot - Front, Other Streets 25 feet measured form the front lot line of the base lot 25 feet measured from the front lot line of the base lot - Side - 10 feet measured from the side lot line of the base lot - 20 feet between attached structures separated by a common area - 10 feet measured from the side lot line of the base lot - 15 feet between attached structures separated by a common area - Rear 25 feet measured from the rear lot line of the base lot 25 feet measured from the rear lot line of the base lot Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet f. Reduced front parking setback along Oswald Farm Road as follows: i. 15’ for Lot 1 and Lot 6 of Block 5 ii. 10’ for Lot 2 of Block 1. g. No interior side setback required for the shared parking lot. h. Lot 1 of Block 1 is subject to the Public/Institutional (P-I) district standards. Except a tunnel connecting the Senior Housing building in Lot 1, Block 1 can encroach into the required 50’ setback. i. An encroachment easement with the City will be required. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 4 of 10 i. The remaining lots in the plat and PUD will be subject to the GMU district standards unless otherwise modified in this Resolution. j. Parking requirements are as follows: i. Villas must have 2 garage spaces and 2 driveway spaces. ii. Rowhomes must have 2 garage spaces, 2 driveway spaces, and 9 guest parking stalls. iii. Market-rate Multi-Family buildings must be parked as 2 spaces per unit. iv. Senior Housing and Active Senior buildings must be parked at 1 space per unit. v. A formal shared parking agreement must be established with Hope Community Church for overflow parking for the Senior Housing and Active Senior buildings. vi. A shared parking lot for the commercial uses is permitted should the square footage not exceed what is shown currently on the site plan. 415 spaces are required. vii. Snow storage and required bicycle parking cannot utilize parking spaces where a reduction is granted. k. The commercial parking lot can deviate from the spacing requirements for intermediate landscaped islands requirements as long as at least 6 clear pedestrian pathways are provided within the parking lot. The number of intermediate landscaped islands can be no less than if the spacing requirements were followed. All landscaped islands must meet the minimum size requirements as outlined in the Northeast District Design Guidelines (Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance). l. Drive-through lanes on Lots 2 and 5 of Block 5 can be between the building and a frontage but must be screened per Section 10670.0760, Subd. 2(J). m. Where there is a conflict in site design requirements between the GMU district and the Northeast District Design Guidelines (Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance), the Northeast District Design Guidelines prevail. i. The PUD is subject to the building design requirements of the Northeast District Design Guidelines, unless otherwise noted in this Resolution. 1. Buildings with residential uses on first floors do not need to be raised above the sidewalk elevation. 2. The garages for the detached villas can have a garage that comprises up to 70% of the street-facing linear building frontage. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 5 of 10 3. The garages for the rowhomes must have a minimum width of 20’ and accommodate two cars. ii. The PUD is subject to the screening requirements of the Northeast District Design Guidelines. 1. Wood fencing or chain link with slats shall not be used for screening. n. The underlying landscaping requirements must be calculated on a per lot basis but can be distributed throughout the entire site instead of a per lot basis with emphasis placed on screening the perimeter of the development. i. Additional landscaping required for screening, buffering, and enhanced landscaping requirements must be located on a per lot basis. ii. Significant trees removed from the site must be replaced by a similar species as noted in the table below. Invasive species or undesirable tree species do not need to be replaced. Trees to be removed Replace With Similar NE District Options For Replacement From Preferred Tree List Elm – Siberian (Ulmus pumula) Elm -Americana (Ulmus americana) Yes Princeton Elm (Ulmus americana ‘Princeton’) Valley Forge Elm (Ulmus americana ‘Valley Forge’) New Horizon Elm (Ulmus pumila ‘New Horizon’) Patriot Elm (Ulmus wilsoniana ‘Patriot’) Box Elder (Acer negundo) No Maple – Silver (Acer saccharinum) Yes Freeman’s Maple (Acer x freemanii) Sienna Glen Maple (Acer x freemanii ‘Sienna’) Red Maple (Acer rubrum)* Sugar Maple (Acer saccharum)* Spruce – Colorado (Picea pungens) Yes Norway Spruce (Picea abies) White Spruce (Picea glauca)* Black Hills Spruce (Picea galuca var. densata) Black Spruce (Picea mariana)* Cottonwood (Populus deltoides) No Ash – Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) European Mountain Ash (Sorbus aucuparia) Yes American Mountain Ash (Sorbus americana) Showy Mountain Ash (Sorbus decora)* Fir – Balsam (Abies balsamea) Yes Balsam Fir (Abies balsamea)* Apple (Malus spp.) Yes Crabapple, ‘Adams’, ‘Calocarpa’, ‘David’, ‘Donal Wyman’, ‘Dolgo’, ‘Harvest Gold’, City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 6 of 10 ‘Prairifire’, ‘Professor Sprenger’ (Malus spp.) Locust – Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos) Yes Thornless Honeylocust (Gleditsia tricanthos var. inermis)* Willow – Black (Salix nigra) Yes Black Willow (Salix nigra)* Birch – River (Betula nigra) Yes Heritage River Birch (Betula nigra ‘Cully’) Basswood (Tilia americana) Yes American Linden or “Basswood” (Tilia americana)* Oak – White (Quercus alba) Yes White Oak (Quercus alba)* iii. Per the approved site plan for the existing cemetery approved in 2012, 8 evergreen trees must be planted between the wooded area and the south boundary of the cemetery for screening to the property to the west. o. Where there is a conflict within the General Mixed Use district standards and buffer yard requirements of Section 1060.070, Subd. 2(J), the buffer yard requirements shall prevail. p. Signage for the site is approved as follows: i. Unless modified by this Resolution, sign and setback standards in Chapter 84 apply. ii. Up to 4 monument signs are approved for the commercial buildings. iii. Each residential component is allowed to have one monument sign. iv. Wall signs can be placed on the entrance façade as well as the façade facing a county road for each commercial user, but the combined size of the signs cannot exceed 10% of the entrance façade area. 11. Park dedication shall be satisfied by a combination of land and cash-in-lieu of land for the PUD. Park dedication will be based on the park dedication ordinance in place at the time the final plat is approved. 12. Prior to submittal of the PUD final plan and final plat, revised preliminary plans must address the following: a. All plans must be consistent. b. A 50’ building setback from the new property boundary must be shown along the county roads. c. The parking must be revised to show the following: i. Compliance with the standards in this Resolution. ii. At least 6 pedestrian pathways with aligned landscape islands in the shared commercial parking lot. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 7 of 10 iii. Required landscape islands in Lot 6, Block 5. iv. Snow storage and bicycle parking that does not conflict with parking spaces must be clearly shown for the commercial and multi-family uses. d. Outlot A must be absorbed by one ore more of the surrounding properties. e. The right-in access for the commercial uses on County Road 116 must be removed. f. The twin-home building pad in Lot 8, Block 1 must be corrected so it does not conflict with a required drainage and utility easement. g. A site plan must confirm the twin-homes can accommodate a 22’ minimum driveway length as shown, or the twin-home lots and private drive will need to be adjusted to meet the 22’ minimum driveway length. h. The landscaping plan must be revised to show the following: i. Calculate the minimum required landscaping on a per lot basis which can be applied throughout the site with emphasis placed on the edges of the site. ii. All underlying shrub requirements must be included. iii. All tree and shrub species in the landscaping plan need to be from the preferred tree list within the Northeast District Design Guidelines. Substantially similar species can be approved by the City. iv. The applicant must provide a count of the number of trees of significant species to be removed and confirm the intended replacement species. v. Inclusion of a decorative fence or masonry wall of at least 3 feet but no less more than 4 feet in height between parking lots and sidewalks. vi. Required screening for the existing cemetery with 8 evergreen trees planted between the existing wooded area and the south cemetery boundary. No more than 30% of one kind of evergreen tree can be used in this area. i. A third resiliency strategy must be identified. j. The lighting plan must be revised to confirm compliance with Section 1060.040. k. The grading plans must identify whether designated wetland buffers within the site are to utilize existing vegetation or if new vegetation will be established for the buffers. i. If existing vegetation is planned to be utilized, the vegetation shall be approved by the City’s wetland specialist. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 8 of 10 ii. The preliminary plans shall be revised to identify and label the wetland buffer zones and monument signs. iii. All permanent wetland buffer monuments must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. iv. The applicant shall work with City staff to finalize the location of wetland buffer monuments. l. Drainage and utility easements must be provided over all wetlands, wetland buffers and ponds. m. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided along the perimeter of all lots. 13. The following information must be confirmed with the submittal of the final PUD plan and final plat for each phase: a. Final building and site plans must be provided as each phase moves forward. i. A minimum of 5 different styles must be submitted for the detached villas. ii. A minimum of 2 different styles must be submitted for attached villas and townhomes. iii. Garage sizes must be confirmed. iv. Elevations with material percentages are required. b. Screening details of roof top equipment and ground mounted equipment must be provided. c. Details for trash enclosures to ensure compliance with 1060.020 of the Zoning Ordinance. The trash enclosures must be clearly shown on the site plans. d. Details of mechanical equipment screening in compliance with Section 1060.030 of the Zoning Ordinance. e. A minimum lot area calculation for the twin-homes and townhomes must be provided. f. The final unit mix in the Senior Housing building and required parking shall be provided. g. A formal shared parking agreement with Hope Community Church for overflow parking of the Senior Housing and Active Senior buildings. h. Details on the required plaza and open space shall be provided. i. A chloride management plan shall be provided. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 9 of 10 j. All utility facilities shall be located underground. k. Maintenace requirements for private roads shall be detailed in Homeowners Association (HOA) documents. l. For wetland buffers that must be newly established, a wetland buffer establishment plan shall be submitted identifying the establishment and maintenance procedures. 14. A sign permit is required for any signage. 15. The development shall comply with the City’s requirements regarding fire access, fire protection and fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrant, fire department connections and fire lane signage. 16. The new public streets shall follow the City’s street naming policy. 17. An encroachment agreement shall be required for all site improvements or items placed within the City rights-of-way or easements. 18. The applicant must enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement prior to release of final plat. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENT A Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: Lot 1, Block 2, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 3: Outlot A, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 4: Outlot C, Serenity Meadows, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Abstract Property). Page 1 of 45 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 8a. City Council Meeting i February 22, 2024 Prepared By Natalie Davis McKeown Topic Hope Ministries Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary PUD Plan, and Preliminary Plat (PIDs 11-119-23-14-0003, 11-119-23-14-0004, 11-119-23-14-0005, 11-119-23-11-0012) (City File No. 23-028) Action Required Approval Review Deadline: April 2, 2024 1.Application Request The applicants (Hope Community Church, Brian and Jacque Lother, and Corcoran Investments, LLC) request approval of a 40-acre mixed-use development at the northwest corner of County Road 116 and County Road 30 and surrounding the existing Hope Community Church location. 2.Background Hope Community Church is an existing institution located at 19951 Oswald Farm Rd. Hope Community Church purchased the subject parcels over 20 years ago with a long-term vision to create a campus that would provide places for people of multiple age groups to live, work, dine, and worship. Significant components of this vision include senior housing options as well as medical office space. The church was approved in 2001. As part of the original approvals, the landowner provided a concept plan for future build out of the entire church property, which included senior housing, office/retail on the property east of the church, and a cemetery west of the church. No approvals for future phases were granted as these were conceptual plans only. Figure 1 Site Location Page 2 of 45 In 2005, the City approved a request from the church to complete a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow a daycare on site with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). In 2006, the church submitted a request for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow development of land in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) prior to availability of services, subject to several conditions. This request was approved. In 2012, the City approved a CUP and a Site Plan Amendment to allow a 498-plot cemetery on 1.504 acres of land west of the existing church. As a part of this approval, the applicant was required to plant screening for the cemetery, and an escrow was taken as a financial security to guarantee the work. However, there was confusion as to whether this screening was desired by the neighboring property. It was confirmed at the public hearing on February 1, 2024, that the screening is desired by the adjoining property owner at this time. Brian Lother confirmed he will install the screening as shown on the 2012 plan to close out that project. This is discussed further in the landscaping section of the analysis. Most recently, the Lothers and Hope Community Church worked with the City to provide land for a water treatment plant and water tower in the Northeast District. 3.Prior Review A concept plan for this proposal was reviewed by the Council on January 12, 2023. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed for the development proposal, and the City issued a Notice of Decision confirming no need for an Environmental Impact Statement on July 27, 2023. Applicants wishing to submit a request for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) are now required to host a neighborhood meeting prior to submittal of their preliminary application. A meeting was held at Hope Community Church on Wednesday, October 11, 2023. A summary of the meeting is enclosed with this report. The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed this application on December 14, 2023. The information was specifically regarding the Three Rivers’ Diamond Lake Regional Trail and estimated park dedication fees for the project. Their recommendation is discussed subsequently in this report when the trail is discussed in more detail. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing on February 1, 2024. Several participants spoke at the public hearing stating concerns around traffic, grading, and the density of the proposed project. The Planning Commission discussed these concerns as well as the requested flexibilities and proposed benefits of the application. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the following: -Resolution Approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment (4-0; Horn absent) -Ordinance Approving a Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (3-1; Lind voted nay) -Resolution with Findings of Fact for Rezoning to a PUD (3-1; Lind voted nay) Page 3 of 45 -Resolution Approving the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan (3-1; Lind voted nay) o An amendment was made requiring the applicant to complete a 1-1 tree replacement for any significant native tree species removed. This is discussed further in the landscaping section of this report. o The Planning Commission recommended the Northeast District Design standards prevail over the standards of the General Mixed Use District (GMU) where a conflict arises between the two sets of standards. -Resolution Approving the Preliminary Plat (3-1; Lind voted nay) 4.Context Zoning and Land Use The proposed development spans four parcels. Two parcels do not have any existing structures. One parcel has an existing single-family home. The largest parcel contains Hope Community Church and the associated cemetery. The City recently approved a subdivision on the Hope Community Church parcel for a 1.2-acre parcel to be used as the location for the City’s first water tower. Construction on the water tower is underway, and this property is noted as “not included” in the preliminary plat exhibit. The existing church site is zoned Public/Institutional (P-I) while the three surrounding parcels to the east are currently zoned GMU. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the church site as Public/Semi-Public with the three surrounding parcels are guided as Mixed Use. All four properties are within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and are within Phase 1 of the 2040 Staging Plan. The applicant’s team shared at the Planning Commission meeting that the entire church site was previously guided and zoned for mixed use along with the surrounding properties. This is accurate. The 2020 Comprehensive Plan stated the following: The area located at the intersection of County Roads 116 and 30 and east to County Road 101 is also designated as Figure 2 2003 Northeast District Land Use Map Page 4 of 45 mixed use with an overlay PUD to call out that the City deems this corridor as unique and critical. The church site was changed to Public/Semi-Public and P-I as part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan update. Surrounding Properties The guiding, zoning, and existing use of the surrounding properties are detailed in the table below. All surrounding properties are within the MUSA. Direction Guided Zoning District Use Staging Phase North Existing Residential Urban Reserve (UR) Single-family Residential Neighborhood Phase 4 2035-2040 East (Across CR 116) -Existing Residential - Business Park -UR -Single Family Residential 1 (RSF-1) - Business Park (BP) -Single-family residential neighborhood -City Water Treatment Plant -Agriculture/Vacant -Phase 4 -Phase 1 2020- 2025 South (Across CR 30) Mixed Use General Mixed Use Agricultural Homestead Phase 1 West Mixed Residential UR Agricultural Homestead Phase 3 2030-2035 Page 5 of 45 Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2040 Comprehensive Plan’s Natural Resource Inventory Areas map does not reflect any natural communities on the four subject properties. Previous wetland delineations confirmed two large wetlands northwest of the church. A wetland delineation was finalized for the entire project site in May of 2023. A total of 6 wetlands were delineated on the site. 5. Analysis The development proposal includes the following application components: comprehensive plan amendment (CPA), rezoning, preliminary planned unit development (PUD) plan, and preliminary plat. The development plan includes 641 housing units and 80,200 square feet of commercial space. The proposed uses include the following: -A 13-acre parcel will be carved out to contain the existing Hope Community Church site, a tot-lot, existing cemetery, and a future cemetery expansion is noted on the site plan. -Multi-Family “A” o Market-rate apartment building o 4-stories o 148 units -Retail “B” o 10,100 square feet commercial building o Potential users possible with this space include a small grocery store, coffee shop, restaurant, barbershop, bank, pharmacy, child care, etc. -Medical “C” o 2-story medical office building o 31,300 square feet -Medical “D” o 2-story medical office building o 28,800 square feet -Retail “E” o 10,000 square foot commercial building o Same uses as discussed for Retail “B” are anticipated for this building. Figure 3 2023 Wetland Delineation Page 6 of 45 -Shared parking lot to serve the retail and medical buildings. -Multi-Family “F” o Market-rate apartment building o 4-stories o 184 units -Senior Housing o Apartment building o 122 units o Full continuum of care including independent living, assisted living, memory care, and hospice. A breakdown of the number of units that would be independent living versus assisted living or hospice units is not available at this time as the end user is not finalized for this building. For the sake of reviewing the preliminary application, all of these units will be treated as independent living units. The finalized mix of units would be confirmed with the submittal of a final plat/final PUD for the phase that includes this building. o 28 memory-care units The application does show a wing of the building committed to 28 memory-care units. -Active Senior o Apartment building catered to 55+ Active Senior population. o 110 units o Independent living -Villas “I” o 20 detached (single-family) senior villas o 6 twin-home senior villas o One-level living -Rowhomes “J” o 51 townhome units o 7 groups of townhomes ranging from 4-9 units o Market-rate / non-age restricted. -Three River’s Diamond Lake Regional Trail and underpass to cross County Road 16. Page 7 of 45 A.Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a CPA. The comprehensive land use plan is the City’s long-range planning tool that indicates what type of development should occur on all land within the City. It is the City’s plan for directing future development and growth. The City Council may guide property as it deems necessary to protect and promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City must deny the rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving PUDs. A PUD must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City may impost requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community and surrounding areas. Figure 4 Site Plan Received 1/30/2024 Page 8 of 45 The City’s discretion in approving a preliminary plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinances. If it meets the standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. B.Consistency with Ordinance Standards Staff reviewed the application for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and other City Code requirements, as well as City policies. Planning staff coordinated review of the development application with Public Works and Engineering as well as the Public Safety team. Memos from the City Engineer and Public Safety are enclosed in this report as well as incorporated into the following analysis as appropriate. The applicant is responsible for reviewing the entirety of both memos, and the approval conditions require compliance with the memos. Comprehensive Plan Amendment As part of the development proposal, the applicant requests to amend the 2040 Future Land Use Map to update the land use guiding from Public/Semi-Public to Mixed Use on the northern portion of the existing Hope Community Church site to allow for senior housing apartments and villas (both detached and attached twin-homes). The site for Hope Community Church will remain guided as Public/Semi-Public. The Comprehensive Plan is a living document. When the City finds evidence to support a change to the plan, the City Council has the discretion to make a change. The City should consider the following issues when reviewing a CPA request: •Evidence submitted by the applicant demonstrating the reason(s) that the plan should be changed, including, but not limited to, whether new information has become available since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted that supports Figure 5 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Exhibit Page 9 of 45 re-examination of the plan, or that existing or proposed development offers new opportunities or constraints that were not previously considered by the plan. •Whether or not the change is needed to allow reasonable development of the site. •The relationship of the proposed amendment to the supply and demand for particular land uses within the City and the immediate vicinity of the site. •A demonstration by the applicant that the proposed amendment has merit beyond the interests of the proponent. •The possible impacts of the amendment on all specific elements of the Comprehensive Plan as may be applicable, including but not limited to: o Transportation; o Sanitary sewer, including existing and proposed sanitary sewer flows as compared to the adopted plan; o Housing, including the extent to which the proposal contributes to the City’s adopted housing goals; o Surface water, including compliance with the City’s goals for water quality as well as water quantity management; o Water supply; o Parks and open space; and •Consideration of the impact of the proposed amendment upon current and future special assessments and utility area charges, future property tax assessments or other fiscal impacts upon the City. This is a policy decision for the City Council. The City should evaluate all these issues when considering the decision. Staff recommends approval of the future land use change as it will allow reasonable development and is an extension of the mixed-use boundary existing in the area. The change may also have positive fiscal impacts. The higher density in this consolidated area will help contribute to the City’s overall density goal and would be factored in to the 2050 Comprehensive Plan update. Rezoning The properties in this proposed development are currently zoned GMU and PI. The applicant requests rezoning the properties to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) district. Assuming the CPA is approved, the rezoning will be consistent with the underlying land use districts. The districts standards for PI will continue to apply to the site for Hope Community Church and cemetery. The remaining acreage will be developed in accordance with the Mixed Use land designation which anticipates half the district acreage to be developed at a residential density of 8-30 units per acre. The Zoning Ordinance establishes a PUD zoning district with the purpose of granting flexibility from site design requirements in return for creative community designs of exceptional quality with a combination of public benefits. The PUD ordinance clarifies that PUDs for land guided as Public/Semi-Public is assumed to allow uses as detailed in Page 10 of 45 the PI zoning district. Additionally, land guided as mixed use is assumed to allow uses as detailed in the zoning districts for GMU as well as Downtown Mixed Use (DMU). The presumptive performance standards for the Public/Semi-Public portion will continue to be based on the PI zoning district. The presumptive performance standards for the mixed-use portion of the PUD will be based on the requirements of the GMU districts unless deviation from these standards is specifically approved. The applicant’s narrative requests PUD flexibility for the following: •Deviation in lot square footage standards for the Villa units. •Setback reduction for multifamily and commercial buildings along County Road 116 and County Road 30. •Joint Parking / Parking reductions throughout the project area. •Allowance of townhomes, twin-homes, and detached villas in the GMU instead of multi-family housing as the district permits by right. o These housing types are not allowed in GMU but are allowed in the DMU. Allowing these uses as part of a mixed-use PUD is consistent with the PUD ordinance. •Flexibility to shift required landscape material from inner portions of the site to allow for improved buffering at the edges of the site. •Relief from Ordinance 1040.135 which requires a grade separation on all housing units accessing the building on the first level. •Flexibility from landscape island / parking bay spacing standards found within the Northeast District Standards for the commercial parking lot. •Flexibility from the restriction on drive-through lanes abutting public right-of-way (ROW). The applicant proposes to screen the drive-through lanes to mitigate the impact of granting this flexibility. The staff report identifies a number of additional areas of flexibility that will likely be necessary for the application to move forward in a similar vision to what is currently proposed. The concept plan for this development proposal was reviewed prior to the adoption of the City’s PUD Public Benefit Policy on 5/23/2023. Therefore, the proposal will not be reviewed against the policy. However, a combination of public benefits is still expected. In exchange for this flexibility, the applicant proposes the following public benefits: •An architectural transition between existing uses and the proposed development by locating taller buildings as far away from existing single-family homes as possible, lessening impact to existing residents. o Additionally, the requested flexibility for villas and townhomes in the northern portion of the site allows for a transition in density from multi- family buildings to the south. •Construction of Hope Way (this will actually become “100th Ave” per the City’s street naming policy), an east-west connection to future development to the west. Page 11 of 45 This arguably provides relief from future east-west traffic that could otherwise be routed through the existing Hunters Ridge road connection. This idea was received well at the neighborhood meeting. •Coordination with City staff/consultants to shift existing ROW to allow for more economical construction of the water utility lines. •Improvement of existing drainage conditions for neighbors to the south of the project area through stormwater routing through the project area. •Establishment of a significant tax base to serve Corcoran and its residents well into the future. •Provide a trail easement in excess of 20 feet to support a grade-separated crossing at County Road 116 and the Three Rivers Diamond Lake Regional Trail. The applicant proposes to dedicate this easement from the outset of the project to allow for more wholistic trail planning. Alternatively, Three Rivers would need to acquire this easement at a later point which could delay the trail/underpass project and lead to land conflicts in order to expand the corridor. •This project serves as a vital link for future development in the City of Corcoran. •The flexibility in applying the required landscaping across the site will allow for more buffering near the edges of the site. •The flexibility to bypass the parking island / parking bay requirement within the commercial parking lot will allow for more unified pedestrian walkways throughout the commercial parking lot. The PUD flexibility and public benefits are discussed in more detail in the PUD development plan section of this report. The City must review this request for compliance with the PUD standards as follows: 1.The planned development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed PUD appears to comply with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The new parcel for Hope Community Church and associated cemetery will remain guided as Public/Semi-Public. This land use designation is for public facilities as well as semi-public facilities, such as places of worship and golf courses. The Mixed Use land use designation is expected to develop with a mix of residential, retail, and office uses either within one building or one development. The proposed PUD uses are not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Residential development within mixed use areas is anticipated at a density of 8- 30 units per acre. More specifically, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan states the following: The City expects approximately ½ of these [mixed use] areas to develop with residential uses at a variety of densities, but the City will plan for 8-30 units per acre on average. Page 12 of 45 The Comprehensive Plan notes that the City calculates net density (gross land area – wetlands and land below the 100-year ordinary high-water level) to ensure compliance with the Comprehensive Plan goals. That is the calculation that the City has used for other development reviews in Corcoran. Prior to the proposed CPA, the mixed-use portions of the project comprised roughly 25.18 gross acres. Based on the provided site plan, all wetlands not on the church parcel will be impacted, and there is no known floodplain on the site. Therefore, the estimated net acreage is also 25.18. For a mixed-use site, the residential density target is calculated based on the assumption that half of the net acres will go towards residential uses at a density of 8-30 units. This means that roughly 100.7 to 377.7 residential units were anticipated in this area in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The applicant provides that the net mixed use acreage with the requested CPA is 43.74 acres. This means an estimated 174.96 to 656.1 residential units would be expected to be located within the project boundaries considered mixed-use. The proposal includes 641 housing units. The pre-development density when applied to the residential portion of the proposed project area (33.58 net acres) comes back at 19.09 units per acre. The language in the Comprehensive Plan (specifically the use of the term “approximately”) appears to allow for flexibility with how the assumptions are ultimately applied. The density based on the residential acreage of the project is within the density range anticipated for the land use designation. Further, the project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals to provide a variety of housing options. The 2040 Parks and Trails map contemplated the Three River’s Diamond Lake Regional Trail in the vicinity of County Road 116 before meandering northeast near Hunters Ridge on the east side of County Road 116. The City’s Comprehensive Plan was completed prior to Three River’s providing a more finalized alignment. The proposed trail alignment and underpass shown through the southern portion of the proposed project appears to comply with the City’s Parks and Trails plan as well as the Three River’s master plan for the trail. 2.The planned development is not in conflict with the intent of the underlying zoning district and is compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed PUD provides a mix of residential and commercial uses with a combination of public and private pedestrian routes to interconnect the uses throughout the development. This is consistent with the purpose of the GMU district. The church site and cemetery are consistent with the intent of the PI district as a semi-public use. The applicant requests approval of a PUD zoning for design flexibility to allow for modification to requirements for setbacks, site design requirements, lot size, lot width, and building height at a density consistent with the zoning district and Comprehensive Plan. Page 13 of 45 Development within the GMU is only allowed when the full range of municipal services are available to the site. Per the applicant’s narrative, the development process for this project would start in advance of municipal water being operational. However, the applicant does not intend to move forward with building permits until Corcoran water is available for this site. Site work is hoped to start in 2024, but building permits are not anticipated until 2025. A condition of approval is that the applicant cannot apply for building permits prior to Corcoran city water being operational unless a PUD amendment is granted by the City allowing flexibility from this district requirement. 3.The planned development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer will provide the above-noted public benefits. 4.The planned development or unit thereof is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and/or operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other subsequent unit or phase. The planned development is feasible without dependence upon any other subsequent phase. The project is anticipated to be completed in 4 phases that will be able to adapt to the needs of the market. Development is contingent upon completion of trunk infrastructure improvements and water service. The initial phases will include the construction of the primary project infrastructure, required roadway improvements on County Road 116 and County Road 30, and other key public infrastructure improvements needed to support the project. 5.The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. With the proposed improvements identified in the feasibility study that will be required for this project to move forward, the planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing a public trail consistent with the Three River’s Diamond Lake Regional Trail master plan and the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A private tot lot that will be accessible to residents of the planned development is proposed on the church property. The residents living in assisted living, memory care, and hospice units will place less demand on public facilities such as streets and parks. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve the site at the developer’s expense. Page 14 of 45 Municipal water is anticipated to be available at the end of 2024 under best case scenario. The applicant is hoping to start site work by the end of this year; however, they provide it will be unlikely they will be ready for a building permit before 2025. The applicant states they do not intend to pull a building permit prior to the availability of Corcoran water for this site. 6.The planned development will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighboring property. The planned development intentionally placed residential uses near the adjacent residential and agricultural uses to minimize the potential for an undue or adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighboring property. Should the property to the west develop in the future, it will develop with mixed residential uses and densities, which will be compatible with the proposed uses along the western border of the PUD. 7.The quality of the building and site design proposed by the PUD plan shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, shall demonstrate higher standards, more efficient and effective use of streets, utilities, and public facilities, it shall maintain and enhance any natural resources within the development, and create a public benefit that is greater than what would be achieved through the strict application of the primary zoning regulations. The PUD would provide quality building and site design; install and provide streets, utilities, and public facilities more efficiently; and create public benefit that is greater than may otherwise be achieved. The development will meet the City’s density goals, the proposal hopes to address pre-existing stormwater drainage concerns in the vicinity of the project where possible, provide pedestrian routes, and dedicate a larger-than-typical trail easement for an underpass pedestrian crossing at County Road 116. Preliminary PUD Development Plan The PUD zoning district offers greater flexibility in site design requirements in exchange for creative community designs of exceptional quality. This may be accomplished through preservation, restoration, and/or enhancement of natural systems; above- average open space amenities; creative design in the layout of buildings, open space, and circulation; compatibility with surrounding land uses and neighborhood character; and provide greater efficiency in the layout and provision of roads, utilities, and other infrastructure. The applicant anticipates this project will be built over 4 phases. The applicant’s narrative notes that the market will ultimately drive the phasing of the project, but they believe the multifamily and senior housing will lead the development due to current market conditions and availability of utilities. At this point, the applicant anticipates the first building permits will be pulled in early 2025 with grading and utility work Page 15 of 45 commencing later this year (2024). They do not intend to apply for building permits until watermain and sanitary sewer are in place and operational. Uses Per the PUD ordinance, mixed-use PUDs are presumed to include all permitted and accessory uses in addition to uses allowed by conditional, interim, or administrative permits within the GMU and Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) districts. Additionally, PUDs located on land guided as mixed-use are expected to include a combination of residential and commercial uses. The proposed housing types and commercial buildings are consistent with the uses outlined within these districts. While the GMU only contemplates multi-family housing, assisted living, and nursing homes, the DMU does contemplate detached houses and attached houses as permissible uses. The two retail commercial buildings are shown to include drive-throughs. While drive- throughs are conditional uses within the GMU, they are not allowed to be located between a street frontage and the building. This is a GMU standard as well as a general performance standard of drive-through conditional use permits (CUP). However, this standard appears to be difficult to satisfy with the location of the commercial buildings, the City’s stacking requirements, and the fact these lots have double street frontages. The applicant requests flexibility from this standard and proposes to screen the drive- through lanes with vegetation to mitigate the impact of the flexibility. Lot 2, Block 1 includes both the Active Senior building and the Senior Housing building. Per Section 1060.050, Subd. 3, no more than one principal building shall be located on a multiple family residential lot or non-residential lot, except by conditional use permit. Two principal buildings on Lot 2, Block 1 would be approved as part of the permitted uses in the PUD. The parcel for the church and cemetery is consistent with uses contemplated within the underlying PI district. The proposed PUD will allow the cemetery as a permitted use. However, a site plan for the future cemetery expansion will need to be approved as part of a future final PUD plan when Hope Community Church is ready to proceed. Lot Standards Per the PUD ordinance, the district regulations of the most closely related underlying zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate but may be departed from as deemed appropriate to accomplish the purpose and intent of a PUD. Page 16 of 45 The church parcel was reviewed against the PI district standards. All the PI standards are satisfied, or exceeded, with the exception of a tunnel connection shown between the Senior Housing building and the church that will be within the 50’ side setback. This tunnel will serve for easy transportation for senior residents, some of which may need more assistance than others, from their residence to the church. This can be handled as a PUD flexibility and limited to the tunnel connection. This tunnel connection will also require an encroachment agreement with the City since it is within the City’s drainage and utility easement. The commercial and multi-family housing uses will be reviewed against the GMU district standards for the commercial and multi-family housing uses. The applicant’s narrative requested flexibility from the front setback from county roads as well as flexibility from the building height limit. The requested flexibilities from the GMU lot standards are shown in red in the table below. Commercial & Multi- Family Proposed GMU Minimum Lot Area 25,000 square feet 25,000 square feet Minimum Lot Width 150 feet 150 feet Minimum Lot Depth NA NA Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks -Front, Major Roadways 50 feet with enhanced landscaping 100 feet -Front, Other Streets 25 feet 25 feet -Side None None -Rear None None Figure 6 Tunnel Connection Between Church and Senior Housing Building Page 17 of 45 Maximum Principal Building Height 50 feet at the minimum setback 35 feet at the minimum setbacks but may be increased up to a maximum of 50 feet with increased setback at a rate of 1-foot additional height for every 5 feet in additional setback Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage 80% 80% Section 1060.070, Subd. 2(K) allows for the 100’ setback from major roads (i.e. county roads and state highways) to be reduced to 60’ with enhanced landscaping. However, the applicant’s narrative requests a 50’ setback be applied along County Road 116 and County Road 30, and they are requesting the additional 10’ of ROW required on County Road 116 be factored into this measurement. Based on the submitted site plan as compared to the preliminary plat, it appears this equates to a setback of 40’ setback as measured from the front property line. However, the applicant confirmed verbally the intent for a 50’ setback as measured from the new property line. A condition of approval is for the site plan to be revised to be consistent with the preliminary plat and show a 50’ setback line from the new property line along County Road 116. The applicant provides the enhanced landscaping for the multi-family buildings and commercial buildings. The medical buildings are expected to be two-story structures which should be able to comply with a 35’ building height. However, the multi-family housing buildings are expected to be 4-stories and as tall as 50’. A 50’ tall building would require an additional 75’ setback above the minimum setback requirements. The multi-family housing parcels will end up having front setbacks applied on three sides. These parcels have limited depth to accommodate this additional setback requirement for the proposed building heights. An increased setback from the county roads would likely mean the surface parking lots would need to wrap further around the buildings with a larger portion of the parking lots adjacent to the county road frontage rather than keeping the parking lots interior to the development as much as possible. Detached and attached homes (such as twin-homes and townhomes) are not contemplated within the GMU, so the GMU lot standards are not well-suited for such uses considering the density goals of the district. Even though detached and attached homes are contemplated in the DMU, unfortunately, the lot standards in that district also do not appear well-suited for such uses. The detached villas seem most consistent with the single-family home standards within the RMF-2 (Mixed Residential) district and are used to review the proposed PUD. Areas where a deviation would be required are noted in red. Detached Single-Family RMF-2 Proposed Page 18 of 45 Minimum Lot Area 6,000 square feet 5,285 square feet Minimum Lot Width 60 feet 44 feet Front, Major Roadways 100 feet N/A Front, Other Streets 25 feet 25 feet Side 10 feet 7.5 feet Rear 25 feet 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet The applicant’s plat and site plan propose a base lot of 76,000 square feet to serve 6 twin-home lots, each 1,920 square feet in size. The zoning ordinance does not seem to contemplate twin-homes within a surrounding base lot, but rather one lot for the entire twin-home structure. Therefore, it appears it makes more sense to apply townhome standards in the RMF-2 in the review of the twin-homes. Attached Homes RMF-2 Proposed Twin- Homes Proposed Townhomes Minimum Lot Area 5,000 square feet per unit 14,500 square feet per unit 4,500 square feet per unit Minimum Lot Width N/A N/A N/A Front, Major Roadways 100 feet N/A 50 feet measured from the front lot line of the base lot (with enhanced landscaping) Front, Other Streets 25 feet 25 feet measured from the front lot line of the base lot 25 feet measured from the front lot line of the base lot Side -10 feet -20 feet between attached structures separated by a common area -10 feet measured from the side lot line of the base lot -20 feet between attached structures separated by a common area -10 feet measured from the side lot line of the base lot -15 feet between attached structures separated by a common area Rear 25 feet 25 feet measured from the rear lot line of the base lot 25 feet measured from the rear lot line of the base lot Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet Page 19 of 45 The intent of the per unit square foot requirement is intended to be an average based on the twin-home and townhome areas (a sum of the unit footprints plus the common areas of the base lot divided by the number of units). Staff provided an approximate calculation for the proposed minimum lot area for the twin-homes and another calculation for the townhomes; however, the applicant will be required to provide a minimum lot area calculation using this formula to confirm compliance with the final PUD plan/final plat for these phases. Staff review noted that the building pad shown for the twin-home located in Lot 8, Block 1 appears to encroach within the required drainage and utility easement (D&U). The preliminary plat and site plan must be revised so the building does not conflict with the required D&U in this area. Public Safety Public Safety reviewed this item at two meetings at the end of 2023. Additionally, the applicant scheduled a meeting with the City of Roger’s Fire Chief to work through fire access questions. The Public Safety memo is enclosed with this report, and the applicant is responsible for reading the memo and complying with any requirements. There was a fair amount of support for a reduced setback along County Roads for ease of fire access on the rear side of the buildings. Additionally, Public Safety requested clustered landscaping along the county roads, particularly with overstory trees, to provide access corridors. Parking Parking standards in Sect ion 1060.060, Subd. 4 of the Zoning Ordinance requires drive aisles and parking lots are subject to the following setbacks: -Front, Major Roadways 100’ or 25’ with enhanced landscaping -Front, Other Roadways 25’ -Side and Rear 10’ However, the GMU allows for shared parking arrangements that are fully connected. The table below identifies where flexibility would be required to approve the plan as shown: Parking Front, Major Roadway Front, Other Roadways Side/Rear Multi-Family A 100’ or 25’ with enhanced landscaping 16’ 10’ Commercial Area 100’ or 25’ with enhanced landscaping 25’ 10’ No interior setback required for shared Page 20 of 45 commercial parking lot Multi-Family F 100’ or 25’ with enhanced landscaping 10’ N/A Senior Housing N/A 15’ 10’ The plans reflect 90-degree parking throughout the development which must comply with the following standards: -Stall width parallel to aisle – 9’ -Stall length of line – 9’ -Stall depth – 18’6” -Aisle width – 26’ The plan appears to comply with these standards. Additionally, the plan complies with a standard within the GMU that at least half of the residential parking spaces shall be provided in structured parking or in enclosed garages. The City Code requires the following minimum number of stalls per each proposed use: Use Number of Stalls Required Single and Multi-Family Housing 2 spaces per unit plus 1 space for each 5 units in an apartment or townhome complex Senior Housing 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit Retail Uses 8 parking spaces plus 1 space for each 200 sq. ft. of retail space and 1 space for each 35 sq. ft. of dining area Office Buildings 1 space for each 200 sq. ft. of floor area. Minimum of 8 spaces required. The applicant’s narrative notes that the senior villas are intended to have 2 garage spaces and 2 driveway spaces. This more than complies with the required number of stalls for single-family and twin-home housing. The townhomes are also proposed to have 2 garage spaces and 2 driveway spaces. Additionally, the site plan shows proof of parking for an additional 9 guest parking stalls. This more than satisfies the standard, and the resolution requires at least 9 guest parking stalls be provided when the townhomes are constructed. Page 21 of 45 The applicant is requesting a reduction in the parking requirements for the muti-family housing buildings. Section 1060.060, Subd. 10 allows space reductions to be permitted through an Interim Use Permit if an applicant can demonstrate in documented form a demand which is less than what is required by code. The applicant completed a parking study as did the City Engineer. This was weighed with the City’s parking requirements for multi-family housing as well as requirements in neighboring jurisdictions. This process supported a deviation from City Code, and staff is comfortable recommending 2 spaces per unit for each multi-family building which can be approved as part of the PUD. Multi-Family A appears to comply with this standard, but the site plan did not include the required landscaping islands that will be discussed subsequently in this report. Also, Multi-Family F is currently short 7 spaces under this new formula. The applicant must revise the plans to confirm parking at 2 spaces per unit. The applicant also requests a deviation from the senior housing parking requirement of 1.5 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit. This was also supported by the study submitted by the applicant with results confirmed by Stantec. There are 232 units within the two senior buildings, and there are 249 stalls proposed. Additionally, the Hope parking lot is noted as a viable off-site option for overflow parking within the applicant’s study. This is more than what was provided on the St. Therese project which also had a mix of independent living and assisted living units. The difference with this project is the number of independent units has not been confirmed. The unit mix will need to be confirmed for the final plat/PUD for this site in order to confirm there is enough parking for the site. Additionally, a formal shared parking agreement with Hope Community Figure 7 Townhomes Proof of Guest Parking Page 22 of 45 Church will need to be submitted with the final PUD plan/final plat for the senior buildings to accommodate overflow parking. For the commercial parking, the applicant proposes a shared parking lot with some reduced parking. The GMU allows for reduced parking for shared parking arrangements for non-residential uses. This was also reviewed in the studies completed by the applicant and Stantec. A total of 415 spaces are provided and the studies confirmed this will support the demand as long as the medical buildings are limited to 2 stories. This would be a standard of the PUD. The applicant will need to show snow storage accommodations for the parking lots. Staff does not recommend allowing snow storage within the parking spaces where reductions are requested. Further, the NE District plan requires all multi-family and non- residential developments to provide a Chloride Management Plan. The applicant should carefully consider the snow storage locations as a part of their overall management plan for the development. The Chloride Management Plan will be required with the final PUD submittal. The NE District Plan requires bicycle racks as a part of the parking requirements for multi-family and non-residential uses. The parking plans will need to reflect bicycle racks which may be placed near the entrance of the buildings if a minimum 5-foot-wide pedestrian access to the building entrance is maintained. The NE District standards state that bicycle parking may occupy a maximum of two required parking stalls without requiring additional parking; however, staff does not recommend this flexibility in this instance due to the parking reductions requested. Landscaped islands as required per the NE District plan are shown with the exception of the parking lot for the Multi-Family A site. The site plan must be revised to show these islands and confirm parking requirements can be satisfied. The applicant requests flexibility in the placement of the intermittent landscaping islands for the commercial parking lot. This will allow for more cohesive pedestrian pathways to be provided through coordinated placement of the islands. Staff noted that the site plan for the commercial parking lot shows a few cohesive pedestrian pathways, but staff would like to see more cohesive pathways to the Medical C, Medical D, and Retail E buildings. The below image highlights where a cohesive pedestrian pathway is provided in the commercial lot in green, where staff would like to see some adjustments to create a more cohesive pathway in orange, and landscape islands that staff believes could be removed in order to achieve a more cohesive pathway in red. The orange and red highlights are not necessarily meant as the final design/location but are meant to show the general idea of how a more unified pathway could be achieved in this portion of the Page 23 of 45 shared parking lot. The PUD resolution requires that the site plan for the commercial parking lot be revised to provide 6 unified pathways to the commercial buildings. Retaining Wall A retaining wall is shown behind the detached villas in Block 2. The applicant must confirm whether these will exceed 4’. If so, they must be designed by a structural engineer and reviewed by Engineering. Utilities, Streets, and Access The City Engineer’s memo provides detailed plat, utility, and transportation comments. This project will extend municipal sewer and water through the site. The City ordinance requires developers to stub sanitary sewer, water, and streets to the property line, which means development of this infrastructure makes development possible for adjacent properties. During review, staff became aware of an outlot (Outlot B of Serenity Meadows) that was created without street frontage that is adjacent to the townhomes portion of the proposed development (north of Lot 4 Block 4 in the proposed plat). Figure 8 Landscape Islands / Unified Pedestrian Pathways Exhibit Page 24 of 45 While it was confirmed this outlot has no development rights, it theoretically can develop at an urban density once utilities are deemed available to this existing neighborhood (currently in Phase 4). There is an existing 20’-wide driveway easement on the proposed townhomes site for access to the outlot. Since the properties included in this plat were all a part of the original plat for Serenity Meadows, staff believe access must be addressed with this application. This will ensure the outlot has access to streets and utilities should it develop in the future. The applicant submitted a revised plat and site plan that dedicates a 50’ ROW through the townhomes site to the outlot for future road construction, and utilities must be stubbed as a part of this project. The development shows two main access locations. One is at the existing Hunters Ridge intersection at County Road 116, and the second intersection is at the south side of the development along the west property line. This location is consistent with the Northeast (NE) District Plan. The plat shows the entire 60’ ROW for the southern access within the boundaries of this plat consistent with the Concept Plan discussion. The applicant shows two future development connections to the western property which is consistent with the NE District Plan. The feasibility study identified the following off-site transportation improvements required to support this project: -County Road 30/County Road 116 Figure 9 Outlot B of Serenity Meadows Page 25 of 45 o Construct dedicated westbound right lane 300’ in length. -County Road 116/Hunters Ridge/Oswald Farm o Previously programmed northbound and southbound left and right turn lane improvements will provide access at intersection. o Widen eastbound Oswald Farm and widen westbound Hunters Ridge to provide a 200’ left turn lane and through/right lane. -New County Road 30 Access o Construct a 300’ eastbound left turn and westbound right turn lanes on County Road 30. Construct southbound approach with 200’ left turn and right turn lanes. These projects are anticipated to be City-led development, and the terms of these projects will be identified at the time of the development agreement. The townhomes and twin-homes are served by private roads which are allowed when the Council finds that a public street connection is not required for the public street network. Maintenance requirements for private roads must be detailed in Homeowners Association (HOA) documents. In 2023, the City adopted the following standards for private drives in urban residential districts: -A private drive shall not exceed 2,640 feet in length unless it forms a continuous connection or loops back to a public street. Any such private drive with a terminus 1,320 feet or more from the nearest intersection will be required to provide a cul-de- sac at the closed end according to City Engineering Standards. -The subdivider shall provide access to lots via public streets. Private drives are subject to the access standards of 945.020, Subd. 12, D and 945.020, Subd. 12, F. -Roadway standards must comply with Section 945.010, Subd 5 (Engineering Design Standards). Private drives shall conform to the City of Corcoran Standard Detail Plates for shared driveways, as may be amended. The City Engineer may require additional site information and may require additional design standards that enhance safety. -Individual unit driveways that gain access from any such private drive shall be a minimum of 22’ in length. -A decorative sign stating “Private Drive” shall be located near each entrance to a private drive. Such a sign shall also provide the range of addresses served by the private drive. The most recently received site plan confirms most of the driveways accessing the private drives will be able to meet a 22’ minimum length. However, this may be difficult for at least two of the twin-homes as they are currently shown. The applicant must either confirm a 22’ driveway can be accommodated, or the twin-home lots and private drive will need to be adjusted to meet this standard in addition to the other lot standards. The applicant shows a right-in into the commercial portion of the development that was not included in the NE District Plan. The memo from Hennepin County requested Page 26 of 45 additional information which was submitted by the applicant on January 22. However, Hennepin County has since confirmed the right-in will not be approved due to the high rate of traffic at this intersection. The applicant’s plans must be revised to remove the right-in access. The City Engineer’s Memo noted that Hennepin County must review and approve ROW. The Hennepin County memo stated a 60-foot half ROW with an additional 5’ easement for drainage, utility, and future multi-modal purposes will be required along County Road 30 and County Road 116. The County also requested a 25’ x 25’ ROW sight triangle in the northwest quadrant of County Road 30 and County Road 116; the northwest and southwest quadrant of County Road 116, Hunters Ridge, and Oswald Farm Road; and the northwest and northeast quadrants of County Road 30 and the new access. However, the northwest quadrant of County Road 30 and the new access is not included in this plat and will be established once the western neighboring property develops. The NE District plan notes that the developer is responsible for construction of all streetscape improvements along adjacent streets. These improvements include all hardscape, landscape, and site amenities, such as trails, sidewalks, benches, bike racks, street trees, and plantings. Stormwater Management Attached to this report is a stand-alone City Engineering memo discussing Stormwater. The applicant is responsible for reviewing this memo in its entirety and complying with the requirements. Wetlands The grading plans must identify whether designated wetland buffers within the site are to utilize existing vegetation or if new vegetation will be established for the buffers. If existing vegetation is to be utilized, the vegetation shall be approved by the City Wetland Specialist. For buffers that must be established, a plan identifying the establishment and maintenance procedures shall be provided at the time of final PUD/final plat. The preliminary plans must be updated to clearly identify and label the wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage. Design Standards This site is subject to design standards outlined in the GMU District, the Northeast District Plan and Design Guidelines, and the PUD district. This is in addition to the underlying performance standards that apply to development in general. It should be noted that final building plans have not been submitted at this time as end users are not finalized for any of the uses as of the time of this report. Final site and building design will be approved as part of each phase’s final PUD plan. Page 27 of 45 1.PUD Design Standards The application must satisfy the following PUD requirements: A.Appropriate Integration. PUDs shall be appropriately integrated into existing and proposed surrounding development. This does not mean the PUD reflects the specific standards of the surrounding area such as lot size, density, setbacks, or design. While integration may be achieved through such standards, it may also be achieved through continuation of existing land use types, architectural transitions, landscaping buffering, or other means. The applicant intentionally placed commercial uses within the far southeast corner of the site with villas and townhomes located near the existing single- family neighborhood to the north. Denser housing options (apartment buildings) are located near the church, County Road 116, and County Road 30. While the multi-family building in the southwest corner of the site is near an existing agricultural farmstead, this location makes sense with the vision of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan which anticipates the farm will eventually develop as mixed residential with anticipated uses such as multi-family apartment buildings. The applicant intends to comply with the buffering requirements of the development as well as exceed the standard near the existing residential uses. B.Variety and Enhanced Design. Since PUDs are expected to exceed standards, most residential PUDs should include a wide variety of styles. Style refers to the exterior image and footprint, not the floor plan. Where a wide variety of styles does not make sense, the PUD should include enhanced building design that exceeds underlying standards. i.PUDs with detached homes must provide house elevations for approval. There should be no less than 5 styles of detached homes. ii.PUDs with attached homes (not including apartment buildings) must include no less than 2 styles. iii.For PUDs without a residential component, applicants must provide material boards with renderings for design evaluation. The applicant provided some architectural examples, but the applicant’s narrative notes they do not have specific building designs finalized at this time as they continue to work with potential end users. Their narrative asserts their intention to comply with the NE district standards and any other underlying standards. A condition of approval is for the applicant to comply with this PUD standard, and this will be confirmed with the submittal of final PUD plans for each phase. C.Open space. The open space standard for low density residential PUDs does not apply to this project. Page 28 of 45 D.Perimeter Buffer. PUDs shall provide a landscaping buffer to screen homes from arterial and major collector roads. The landscaping plan shows a landscaping buffer along County Road 30 and County Road 116 to screen the apartment buildings and townhomes from these roadways. E.Public Accessibility. When a PUD includes natural features such as creeks, streams, ponds, and lakes, the PUD shall provide public access to these features. While this site does not have the specific natural features discussed in this standard, there is a fairly large wetland complex northwest of the church. A private path is proposed to provide access to this area, and this will be accessible to the public and residents as noted on the applicant’s Travel Route plan. F.Discretionary Standards. In addition to the above standards, the City Council may impose such other standards for a PUD project as are reasonable and as Council deems are necessary to protect and promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community and surrounding areas. The Planning Commission asked that significant trees being removed be replaced with a similar species. The applicant agreed to adding this standard. This standard is included in the PUD resolution and is discussed further in the landscaping section of this report. The City Council may choose to include other standards for the project as they find may be necessary to make the PUD compatible with the existing neighborhood and the City’s long-term vision for this area. G.Prohibited Features and Modifications. I.The City will not grant side setbacks that result in less than a 15-foot minimum required separation between two detached buildings. The minimum setbacks and proposed site plan will result in a building separation of at least 15’. II.PUDs with detached homes shall be designed to avoid interior perimeter roads that are parallel to arterial roadways. This feature is not proposed in the application. Page 29 of 45 III.PUDs cannot request flexibility from meeting the minimum required screening and/or buffering standards otherwise required in the Zoning Ordinance unless the applicant can show there is a site constraint out of their control that justifies a deviation from these requirements, proposes an alternative screening methods that will meet the intent of the requirements, and/or proposes relocating screening methods to a more beneficial location within the development. The applicant is not requesting flexibility from the required screening or buffering standards. 2.Site Design It appears the plan will be able to satisfy the following site design requirements of the GMU. These will need to be confirmed with the final PUD plan submitted for each phase/site: A.Structures shall be oriented and consolidated to complement existing adjacent development to create a coordinated and visually attractive mixed-use setting throughout the district. This is the first mixed-use development in this area that will set the bar for future mixed-use development. The applicant was mindful in placing residential uses next to existing and future residential uses. Additionally, the villas and townhomes were placed closest to the existing residential neighborhood to the north to provide a transition from the more intense market-rate and senior multi-family housing to the larger lots along Hunters Ridge. The commercial buildings are consolidated in the far southeast corner of the site to minimize the impact on the existing neighborhood. B.Site planning shall respect the relationship of the site to the existing and proposed buildings and streets and major roadways. The site planning appears to respect the existing and future buildings, streets, and major roadways within the vicinity of the project. C.Commercial parking lot design shall include provisions for cross easements and stubbed access drives to the property line for the use of adjacent properties so that residents and customers do not need to return to the public street system to access adjacent developments. The commercial parking lot is proposed as a shared parking lot. Users will not need to re-enter the public street system once they enter into the commercial Page 30 of 45 area to travel to another business within the development. Sidewalks and trails will allow for residents of the development to walk to the commercial portion of the development. The City Council could decide to require a more direct pedestrian pathway be provided between Multi-Family A and the commercial parking lot as this seems feasible. However, this is not currently included in the approving resolutions as sidewalks will be provided within the ROW, so it may be unnecessary. D. Buildings shall have a clearly defined primary pedestrian entrance at street level. This will need to be applied to commercial buildings, multi-family housing, senior housing building, and active senior housing building. Flexibility was not requested from this standard, and the applicant is expected to comply. G. Maximum impervious coverage. The total lot coverage shall not exceed 80% impervious. The applicant confirmed with staff that none of the proposed lots currently exceed a maximum impervious surface limit of 80%, and they intend to comply with this standard. The applicant is specifically requesting flexibility from the following GMU site design standard: F. Drive-through or drive-in lanes are not allowed within the front of any buildings. They must be located to the side or rear of a building. The two retail buildings, each showing the potential for a drive-through business to be located within the structures, have two frontages. Due to the applicant’s efforts to consolidate the commercial uses within the southeast corner of the site, it does not seem that a business within this location would be able to comply with this standard. The applicant would like this standard to be removed, and they intend to screen the drive-through lanes if constructed with landscaping. The following standard appears to be at odds with a similar standard within the NE District Plan. The Planning Commission and staff recommend clarifying the NE District standards should prevail in the PUD when there is a conflict or confusion between the two sets of standards. GMU Standard: E. Wherever a surface parking area faces a street frontage, such frontage shall be screened with a decorative wall, railing, hedge, or a combination Page 31 of 45 of these elements to a minimum height of 2 ½ feet and a maximum height of 3 ½ feet above the level of the parking lot at the build-to line. NE District Plan Standard: A landscape buffer shall be provided between all parking areas and the public sidewalk. The buffer shall consist of shade trees, low shrubs, or perennial flowers and a decorative fence or masonry wall. Plantings and parking lot screen walls or fences shall be no less than three feet and no more than four feet in height to allow a view into and out of parking areas. 3.Building Design Requirements The GMU includes two pages of building design standards. Staff notes that these do not appear to be applicable for detached homes, twin-homes, or townhomes. Additionally, the GMU provides that properties in the mixed-use area must comply with the building and articulation standards outlined in the NE District Plan. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the PUD be held to the NE District design standards with the following modifications: -Garages for detached villas. o Knowing the proposed minimum lot width and the side setback of 7.5 feet for the detached villas, staff believes it is unlikely that the garages will be able to comply with the standard capping the garage at 55% of the viewable ground floor street-facing linear building frontage. The applicant’s narrative confirms 2-car garages are anticipated for these villas. This means the garage will be at least 20’ wide. This would be nearly 70% of the viewable ground floor. A one-car garage would satisfy this requirement. Staff believes there is a benefit of ensuring enough parking for residents and guests over requiring strict compliance with this rule, and this is reflected in the Resolution. The Planning Commission agreed with this approach. Staff notes that discussion on this may need to be re- opened as a PUD amendment as the builder and building plans for the detached villas are finalized. -Garages for attached villas and townhomes. o The garage standards for attached homes have a minimum garage size as follows: The attached villas are single-level, and therefore have a minimum garage size of 540 square feet. It is unclear if the townhomes have basements. If they do, the minimum garage size is 440 square feet. In either scenario, garages must have a minimum width of 20’. o It is unclear if the attached villas and townhomes will be able to comply with the minimum size requirements for the garage without the availability of a more finalized building design. The Planning Commission agreed with Page 32 of 45 staff’s recommendation to simply require the garages fit at least two cars without an identifying a minimum square footage. o Garage sizes must be confirmed with the Final PUD to ensure compliance with this standard. By defaulting to the NE District building standards, this will take care of the applicant’s specific request for flexibility from the following requirement: o C. Residential Uses on First Floors: Whenever residential uses are included on the first floor of a building the first-floor elevation shall be raised above the sidewalk elevations immediately adjacent to the front of the residential unit to ensure the residential unit is separated from the public space. In addition, each first-floor unit must have an individual private entrance at the street level with private courtyard enclosure. The exterior material standards of the NE District Plan will also prevail. Elevations with material percentages will be required with the Final PUD to ensure compliance with the code standards. Screening The screening requirements of the NE District Plan seem to be more stringent, so these standards will prevail with the exception that wood fencing or chain link with slats shall not be used for screening as provided in the GMU. Screening of roof top and ground mounted equipment will be further confirmed when the preliminary plat/PUD is submitted, and building/site design is more finalized. Landscaping The applicant’s narrative requests flexibility not in the amount of landscaping, but where the landscaping is located. This allows them to provide additional screening/buffering on the perimeters of the site. The Multi-Family A lot must provide 148 overstory trees per the underlying landscaping requirement for residential units (one overstory tree per unit). Additional landscaping must be provided per the enhanced landscaping clause for a reduced setback from County Road 30 as well as to satisfy a Buffer Yard Class “D” from the property to the west. Only 95 overstory trees of the underlying trees are proposed on the Multi-Family A site, but the landscaping required for the other two sections of code are present on the site as required. Screening is provided between the parking lot and sidewalk to meet the parking buffer requirement in the NE District plan, but it appears the plan needs to be revised to include either a decorative fence or masonry wall of at least three feet but no less than 4 feet in height. The plans combined the commercial building lots in order to calculate the required landscaping. Typically, staff would apply the landscaping formula on a lot-by-lot basis. If the commercial lots are considered one site for the purposes of the landscaping Page 33 of 45 calculations, this will result in a reduced landscaping requirement for the commercial properties. The resolution proposes that the landscaping plan be revised to calculate the commercial landscaping requirement on a site-by-site basis. Additionally, the underlying understory shrub requirements for the commercial properties were calculated, but these were omitted from the plan and do not appear to be made up elsewhere. This also needs to be addressed with a revised landscaping plan. There appears to be screening between the sidewalk and the parking lot to satisfy the NE District parking screening standard. However, a decorative fence or masonry wall must be confirmed. Multi-Family “F” requires 184 overstory trees, but 148 are proposed on the lot. The enhanced screening requirements for a reduced setback are proposed on the lot. Similar to Multi-Family A, there appears to be screening between the sidewalk and the parking lot. However, the presence of a decorative fence or masonry wall needs to be confirmed. The buffer requirements are also included and appear to comply with a 6’ fence. The Villas require 26 trees, one on each lot. However, the applicant proposes 64 overstory trees in this area to provide more screening for the existing residential. The townhomes require 52 overstory trees; 65 are proposed. The enhanced screening and buffer yard requirements are provided on the overall site for the townhomes as required. For the senior buildings site, 232 overstory trees are required. The plans propose 253. If a drive-through is constructed for Retail B, screening must be provided per Section 1060.070, Subd. 2(J). That is not yet factored into the landscaping plan. This is also true for Retail E. The proposed development is subject to the preferred tree list for the NE District Plan. There appear to be several trees that are from the list. However, some of the species proposed do not appear to be the same as what is provided on the list. The applicant either needs to comply with the NE District tree list as written, or Planning staff will work with a landscape architect to confirm the proposed species are substantially similar as to what is listed in the preferred tree list. Further, the Planning Commission added a requirement that the landscaping plan be revised so that significant trees that are removed in order to develop the site are replaced with a similar species. Staff reviewed the list of tree species to be removed and created a table to provide the comparable species for replacement per the NE District preferred tree list. It was agreed during the meeting that this standard would not apply to invasive species or undesirable trees. Species that do not need to be replaced are noted in the table below as well. Page 34 of 45 Trees to be removed Replace With Similar NE District Options For Replacement From Preferred Tree List Elm – Siberian (Ulmus pumula) Elm -Americana (Ulmus americana) Yes Princeton Elm (Ulmus americana ‘Princeton’) Valley Forge Elm (Ulmus americana ‘Valley Forge’) New Horizon Elm (Ulmus pumila ‘New Horizon’) Patriot Elm (Ulmus wilsoniana ‘Patriot’) Box Elder (Acer negundo) No Maple – Silver (Acer saccharinum) Yes Freeman’s Maple (Acer x freemanii) Sienna Glen Maple (Acer x freemanii ‘Sienna’) Red Maple (Acer rubrum)* Sugar Maple (Acer saccharum)* Spruce – Colorado (Picea pungens) Yes Norway Spruce (Picea abies) White Spruce (Picea glauca)* Black Hills Spruce (Picea galuca var. densata) Black Spruce (Picea mariana)* Cottonwood (Populus deltoides) No Ash – Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) European Mountain Ash (Sorbus aucuparia) Yes American Mountain Ash (Sorbus americana) Showy Mountain Ash (Sorbus decora)* Fir – Balsam (Abies balsamea) Yes Balsam Fir (Abies balsamea)* Apple (Malus spp.) Yes Crabapple, ‘Adams’, ‘Calocarpa’, ‘David’, ‘Donal Wyman’, ‘Dolgo’, ‘Harvest Gold’, ‘Prairifire’, ‘Professor Sprenger’ (Malus spp.) Locust – Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos) Yes Thornless Honeylocust (Gleditsia tricanthos var. inermis)* Willow – Black (Salix nigra) Yes Black Willow (Salix nigra)* Birch – River (Betula nigra) Yes Heritage River Birch (Betula nigra ‘Cully’) Basswood (Tilia americana) Yes American Linden or “Basswood” (Tilia americana)* Oak – White (Quercus alba) Yes White Oak (Quercus alba)* There is a screening requirement within the GMU that applies to adjoining residential use. However, the buffer yard ordinance appears to accomplish this requirement with Page 35 of 45 more specific guidance on how to provide the screening. Staff proposes clarifying the buffer yard ordinance will prevail over the screening requirement within the GMU. Finally, the City Engineer’s memo notes that there appears to be several areas where proposed landscaping conflicts with pond access routes and the storm sewer and trunk utilities. The applicant must revise planting locations to minimize conflicts. Additionally, there are plantings shown in the Hennepin County ROW which will require the applicant to obtain approval from Hennepin County. The applicant will also need to keep in mind the County’s requirement for a 5’ trail easement along County Road 116 and County Road 30. A buffer yard is not required around the church parcel as there is an exemption in the buffer yard ordinance for existing developed parcels, even if they are re-platted, as long as there is no change in use or building expansion. No change in use is proposed on the church site, and the building footprint will not be expanded. However, the site plan approval in 2012 for the cemetery included a landscaping plan showing 8 evergreen trees between the wooded area and the south boundary of the cemetery to provide screening to the property to the west. There was confusion over whether this screening was desired, but it was confirmed at the public hearing by the adjacent landowner that hey would like this screening installed. The applicant will complete this work. The landscaping plan must be revised to show these 8 trees. Lighting The applicant must comply with Section 1060.040. A photometric plan was provided. More information must be provided on the proposed freestanding luminaires to confirm they do not exceed a height of 30’ or extend above the roofline of the principal building; whichever is less. Additionally, any light or combinations of light may not exceed one foot-candle as measured from the property line or the centerline of a public street. It appears there are multiple areas that exceed this standard. The applicant must revise the plan to bring the lighting into compliance with the performance standards. Street lighting locations shall be reviewed by Public Safety with final lighting locations determined at the time of Final Plat/PUD. Signs The application includes an initial sign plan that anticipates the signage needs throughout the development. Signs must comply with Chapter 84 of the City Code unless flexibility is granted through a PUD. The GMU allows 1 freestanding sign with a height of up to 16’ and sign copy area of 64’. The plan proposes 3 monument signs throughout the development that appear to be for the purposes of advertising the commercial users and entrances into the development. Additionally, a larger gateway monument sign is shown on the corner of County Road 30 and County Road 116. Off- site signs technically are not allowed, but flexibility can be granted for the 4 monument signs allowed for each commercial use to be placed throughout the development as desired by the applicant. Page 36 of 45 The GMU does not specifically allow monument signs for residential subdivisions. However, the sign code generally allows residential subdivisions to include up to two monument signs of 32’ in sign copy area and 6’ in height. Each residential component of the development is shown to have a monument sign that complies with these standards. Walls signs for commercial buildings are supposed to be limited to the façade of the front entrance and 10% of the primary building façade The applicant and sign plan request for sign flexibility in splitting the 10% façade limit for walls signs between the front façade as well as the façade that faces the county road for each building. Resiliency Options As a part of the Northeast District Design Guidelines, incoming developments must include 3 resiliency options from a list of 8 strategies provided in Appendix C. The submitted narrative indicates an intention to incorporate solar panels and electric vehicle charging stations throughout the development. These will need to be reflected in the plans as part of the final PUD/final plat submittal. Additionally, a third resiliency strategy must be confirmed and reflected on the plans. Plazas and Open Space Multi-family residential developments are required to provide landscaped private open space for their residents per the NE District Plan. This open space shall be designed and landscaped for outdoor recreation. The plans reflect a small “tot lot” just west of the existing church. No further information is provided in the applicant’s narrative on the tot lot. The narrative does explain the intent to incorporate both indoor and exterior amenities for the multi-family buildings. The exterior amenities may include a swimming pool, grill stations, firepits, pergolas, bocce courts, putting greets and a roof deck for gatherings. Compliance with this standard will need to be confirmed with the final PUD/final plat. 2040 Parks and Trails Map The 2040 Parks and Trails Plan map shows existing on-road trails (painted shoulders) on County Road 116 and County Road 30. Additionally, a proposed off-road trail is shown in the vicinity of County Road 116 which was meant as a placeholder for the anticipated Diamond Lake Regional Trail (DLRT) planned by the Three Rivers Park District. It was expected this trail would connect through Bellwether to the east and move north to the City of Rogers border. Page 37 of 45 Since the adoption of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Three Rivers completed their master planning process for the DLRT. Their proposed route anticipates the trail on the west side of County Road 116 with a grade-separated crossing in the vicinity of the proposed project site. This crossing will allow the trail to connect to the east side of County Road 116 towards Bellwether. The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan suggests the crossing would occur near or at Hunters Ridge. However, as a part of the planning process for this project, Three Rivers completed a feasibility study for the crossing location. Based on factors such as the grades of the site and infrastructure corridors, it was determined the ideal location for an underpass is about half-way between County Road 30 and Hunters Ridge. This will allow for a future trail connection on the Oswald farm property at the northeast corner of County Road 116 and County Road 30 at the time of development. Figure 10 2040 Parks and Trails Map Figure 11 Three Rivers DLRT Master Plan Page 38 of 45 No parks are shown in this area on the 2040 Parks and Trails map. The applicant proposes a tot lot located to the west of the church and “Senior Housing” building. This is proposed as a private park, and access to the Tot Lot will be provided by a private, internal path. Trails and Sidewalks The applicant’s plans show the DLRT in two segments. The trail will run parallel west to east along Oswald Farm Road. Due to the location of this portion of the trail within the road ROW, this segment of the trail will be considered an on-road trail. A 5’ trail easement is shown for this portion of the trail behind the ROW to allow the larger 10’ trail required for Three Rivers to extend outside of the ROW. The trail then moves east of Oswald Farm Road between the Retail E and Multi-Family Housing F buildings. This portion of the easement is considered an off-road trail and will serve as the corridor anticipated for the underpass at County Road 116. There is ongoing discussion as to whether the trail should be located along the north or south side of Oswald Farm Road. The Parks and Trails Commission recommended the trail be moved to the north side of Oswald Farm Rd with a pedestrian crossing to access the underpass. It was hoped this would create less conflict with vehicle traffic entering and exiting the commercial and residential sites. Three Rivers has confirmed they are open to this idea. However, the City’s Engineering memo states that a crossing on the bend of Oswald Farm Road mid-block should be avoided per the City of Corcoran Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy. The memo recommends keeping the trail on the south side of Oswald Farm Road as at least conflicts at the drive entrances would be at a “stopped traffic condition.” If a crossing from Hope Church is proposed, the memo recommends considering shifting the crossing location southwest so that it is not located on the bend of the roadway. Additional details are provided in the memo. The City Council should confirm their preference for staff to bring back to discussions with Three Rivers. For off-road trails, the City policy is to require an 8’ wide trail in a 20’ easement and give credit for the area of off-road trails shown on the Comprehensive Plan. The standard for the Three Rivers trail requires a 10’ wide trail in a 20’ easement. However, the feasibility study completed by Three Rivers for the underpass indicated a corridor of at least 40’ is needed for the off-road segment of the trail to accommodate the underpass and anticipated retaining walls. A 40’ easement is shown on the preliminary plans. Staff recommends the City give park dedication credit for this segment of trail easement based on the City’s standard protocol (20’). However, after further discussions with the applicant and Three Rivers, it is recognized that Three Rivers would need to acquire additional easement to support the design improvement for the underpass. The applicant proposes dedication of the full easement for the underpass now as a public benefit for the Planned Unit Development application to avoid the need for Three Rivers to expand the corridor at a later date. It Page 39 of 45 was anticipated the easement would be at least 40’ wide. Three Rivers provided comment on the preliminary application, and the width of the easement requested for the underpass is now 55’. The applicant will continue working with Three Rivers and the City to finalize the width of the easement and revise plans as necessary. Typically, the developer is responsible for “making certain improvements to the developments for park, playground, trail and public open space purposes, including, but not limited to, finished grading and ground cover for all park, playground, trail, and public open spaces within their developments. No credit for the required dedication shall be given for this work. The City reserves the right to pave the trails or require the developer to pave these off-road trails. Should the City require the developer to pave the trails, the City shall reimburse the Developer for the costs for paving the trail.” In this case, the underpass will be constructed by Three Rivers at an unknown date in the future. The on-road portions of the trail will be constructed as a part of this project. Previous projects offered construction of trail segments by the developer without reimbursement as a public benefit. Neither the Parks and Trails Commission nor the Planning Commission chose to discuss whether they see that as a public benefit worth negotiating with the applicant. This is not currently provided as a public benefit/requirement of the PUD in the proposed resolution. In addition to the trail, the site shows sidewalks on both sides of Oswald Farm Road and Hope Way. Additionally, there are private internal paths shown for access to the tot lot shown to the west of the church. The applicant provided a travel route exhibit to show these pedestrian connections. The sidewalks are indicated in green, the internal paths to the tot lot are shown in blue, and the DLRT is also shown in blue. Figure 12 Travel Route Exhibit Page 40 of 45 Park Dedication The applicant’s plans show an easement of approximately 0.14 acres (roughly 326’ long x 20’ wide) to be dedicated for the off-road underpass of the DLRT. This is consistent with the City’s standard protocol. While the plans are expected to be revised for the easement to become roughly 0.3 acres (326’ x 40’), the City will base park dedication fees using the City’s standard protocol (i.e., 20’ width easement). The exact dimensions of the length of the easement must be confirmed by the applicant in the final plat/PUD plan. Park Dedication Calculation Estimate The preliminary plat indicates a total site area of 54.15 acres. However, park dedication is based on the net land area. This is defined as the gross land area minus wetlands, areas below the 100-year ordinary high-water level, and ROW or easements for existing public streets. This also would exclude the church site since the church was already on a platted lot and subject to park dedication fees. The net land area was not provided. Staff estimates the net area at roughly 43.74. This will need to be confirmed by the applicant. Dedication requirements for a mixed-use development are pro-rated based on the acres of land devoted to each type of land use. Additionally, developments that include memory care and assisted living units shall apply the commercial rate to the percentage of memory care and/or assisted living units that are in the project, multiplied by the project net acres. The estimated calculations based on the current site plan are provided below. The current park dedication ordinance requires 23% of the land area (or the market value of that land) for a mixed-use development. In this case, the developer would be required to dedicate the following: - 23% of 43.74 = 10.06 acres The applicant will receive park dedication credit based on the City’s standard protocol for a trail easement of 20’ wide and a length of approximately 326’. This is roughly 0.14 acres. Credit is given for net acreage only. Assuming a net acreage of 0.14 acres, this would provide 1.5% of the required park dedication. Therefore, the remaining 98.5% of the required park dedication would be cash-in-lieu of land. The 2024 fee schedule has the following fees: - $5,954 per single family unit - $4,040 per multi-family unit - $5,866 commercial and industrial per acre Park dedication is based on the park dedication fees in place at the time of final plat, but for discussion purposes the anticipated formula is as follows: Page 41 of 45 - 10.006 acres of commercial x $5,866 = $58,695.20 - 570 multi-family units x $4,040 = $2,302,800 - 77 single-family units x $5,954 = $458,458.00 - 28 memory care units = 4.3% x $5,866 x 43.74 acres = $11,032.89 - TOTAL = $2,830,986.09 - Less 1.5% = $42,464.79 - Remaining cash due = $2,788,521.30 The final park dedication calculation will be based on final land area calculations and the fee schedule in place at the time of final plat approval. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat requests approval of 43 lots and 1 outlot. However, a condition of approval is for Outlot A to be absorbed by neighboring lots. The applicant requested flexibility from minimum lot size, width, and setback requirements. The approval conditions noted in this staff report may result in changes to the lot layout and may also affect the unit count. The application anticipates the project to be built over 4 phases. Summary of Issues A. Flexibilities - Deviation in lot square footage standards for the Villa units. o Detached villas 5,285 square feet minimum lot area 44’ minimum lot width 7.5’ minimum side setback o Attached villas 14,500 square feet per unit 25’ front setback measured from the front lot line of the base lot 10’ side setback measured from the side lot line of the base lot 25’ rear setback measured from the rear lot line of the base lot - Setback reduction for multifamily and commercial buildings along County Road 116 and County Road 30 to 50’ with enhanced landscaping. - Joint Parking / Parking reductions throughout the project area. o Parking setbacks Multi-Family A – 16’ front setback from other roadways Commercial Area – no interior side setback required Multi-Family F – 10’ front setback from other roadways Senior Housing – 15’ front setback from other roadways o Parking Space Reductions 2 spaces per unit for Multi-Family A and Multi-Family F 1 space per unit for the multi-family senior housing buildings Page 42 of 45 • Shared parking arrangement with Hope Community Church for occasional overflow parking 415 shared spaces to serve the commercial buildings - Allowance of townhomes, twin-homes, and detached villas in the GMU instead of multi-family housing as the district permits by right. a. These housing types are not allowed in GMU but are allowed in the DMU. Allowing these uses as part of a mixed-use PUD is consistent with the PUD ordinance. b. Proposed townhome lot standards: i. 4,500 square feet per unit ii. 50’ front setback from major roadways (with enhanced landscaping) measured from the front lot line of the base lot iii. 25’ front setback from other streets measured from the front lot line of the base lot iv. 10’ side setback measured from the side lot line of the base lot v. 15’ separation between attached structures separated by a common area vi. 25’ rear setback measured from the rear lot line of the base lot - Flexibility to shift required landscape material from inner portions of the site to allow for improved buffering at the edges of the site. - Relief from Ordinance 1040.135 which requires a grade separation on all housing units accessing the building on the first level. - Flexibility from landscape island / parking bay spacing standards found within the Northeast District Standards for the commercial parking lot. - Flexibility from the restriction on drive-through lanes abutting public right-of- way (ROW). The applicant proposes to screen the drive-through lanes to mitigate the impact of granting this flexibility. - Two principal buildings on Lot 2, Block 1. - Allowance for an underground tunnel between the Church and the Senior Housing building to encroach within the required 50’ side setback. - 50’ Maximum Principal Building height at the minimum setback for the Multi- Family buildings. o Commercial buildings limited to two stories. - NE District Design Standards prevail over GMU design standards. - Garages o Detached villas - 70% maximum of the viewable ground floor street- facing linear building frontage. This may need to be revisited as the builder and design is finalized. o Attached villas and townhomes – a 2-car garage is required (no minimum/maximum proposed). - Buffer Ordinance prevails over the screening requirement of the GMU. - Signs Page 43 of 45 o 4 freestanding monument signs for the commercial uses throughout the project site. o One monument sign for each residential component of the development. o Splitting the 10% front entrance façade limit for wall signs between the front entrance façade as well as the façade that faces a county road for each commercial building. B. Benefits - An architectural transition between existing uses and the proposed development by locating taller buildings as far away from existing single- family homes as possible, lessening impact to existing residents. a. Additionally, the requested flexibility for villas and townhomes in the northern portion of the site allows for a transition in density from multi- family buildings to the south. - Construction of Hope Way (this will actually become “100th Ave” per the City’s street naming policy), an east-west connection to future development to the west. This arguably provides relief from future east-west traffic that could otherwise be routed through the existing Hunters Ridge road connection. This idea was received well at the neighborhood meeting. - Coordination with City staff/consultants to shift existing ROW to allow for more economical construction of the water utility lines. - Improvement of existing drainage conditions for neighbors to the south of the project area through stormwater routing through the project area. - Establishment of a significant tax base to serve Corcoran and its residents well into the future. - Provide a trail easement in excess of 20 feet to support a grade-separated crossing at County Road 116 and the Three Rivers Diamond Lake Regional Trail. The applicant proposes to dedicate this easement from the outset of the project to allow for more wholistic trail planning. Alternatively, Three Rivers would need to acquire this easement at a later point which could delay the trail/underpass project and lead to land conflicts in order to expand the corridor. - This project serves as a vital link for future development in the City of Corcoran. - The flexibility in applying the required landscaping across the site will allow for more buffering near the edges of the site. - The flexibility to bypass the parking island / parking bay requirement within the commercial parking lot will allow for more unified pedestrian walkways throughout the commercial parking lot. - Replacement of significant trees with similar species from the NE District preferred tree list. Page 44 of 45 C. Trail Alignment Conclusion Staff reviewed the plan for consistency with the application standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance. Staff noted in the staff report the outstanding issues that must be addressed, and conditions are included in the enclosed resolutions to address these issues. The City Council may modify these conditions. The City has discretion when reviewing a comprehensive plan amendment and PUD. The Council may find that the standards for one or more components of the application have not been met and may vote to deny the project. Should the project be denied, findings of fact should be provided to staff to bring back a denial resolution at the next meeting. 6. Recommendation Move to recommend approval of the following: a. Resolution 2024-14 Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment b. Ordinance 2024-513 Rezoning to PUD i. 4/5 Majority of Seated Council Required for Approval c. Summary Ordinance 2024-514 for Publication i. 4/5 Majority of Council Required for Approval d. Resolution 2024-15 Approving Findings of Fact for Rezoning e. Resolution 2024-16 Approving Preliminary PUD Development Plan f. Resolution 2024-17 Approving Preliminary Plat Attachments: 1. Resolution 2024-14 Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2. Ordinance 2024-513 Rezoning to PUD 3. Summary Ordinance 2024-514 for Publication 4. Resolution 2024-15 Approving Findings of Fact for Rezoning 5. Resolution 2024-16 Approving Preliminary PUD Development Plan 6. Resolution 2024-17 Approving Preliminary Plat 7. City Engineer’s Memo – Civil Plan Review Dated 1/22/2024. 8. City Engineer’s Memo – Stormwater Review Dated 1/22/2024. 9. Public Safety Memo – Dated 12/6/2023. 10. Hennepin County Memo dated 12/28/2023. 11. Three River Parks District Memo dated 1/5/2025. 12. Applicant’s Narrative dated 1/25/2024. 13. Plan drawings received 1/30/2024. 14. Phasing Plan 15. Architectural Examples 16. Cross Section Plan received 1/25/2024. Page 45 of 45 17. Neighborhood Meeting Summary 18. Feasibility Study City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-14 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR “HOPE MINISTRIES” AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 116 AND COUNTY ROAD 30 (PID 11-119-23-14-0004) (CITY FILE NO. 23-028) WHEREAS, Hope Community Church, Brain and Jacque Lother, and Corcoran Investments LLC (“the applicant”) request approval of a 2040 Future Land Use Map amendment to change the lande use designation of approximately 15.97 acres from Public / Semi-Public to Mixed Use on the property described as follows; See Attachment A. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the requested amendment at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a comprehensive plan amendment for the above referenced parcel, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 1.The proposed development offers new opportunities that were not previously considered in the Comprehensive Plan. 2.Reclassifying the site is needed to allow reasonable development of the site that responds to current market conditions. 3.The development of the site as part of the larger development would facilitate other planned infrastructure improvements, including stormwater improvements, sanitary sewer extension, municipal water extension and transportation improvements that will have regional benefits. 4.With the planned infrastructure improvements developed with this project, there is adequate public infrastructure planned to serve the site. Attachment Item: 8a1. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-14 Page 2 of 3 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-14 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A Lot 1, Block 2, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2024-513 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 116 AND COUNTY ROAD 30 (PID 11-119-23-14-0003, 11-119-23-14-0004, 11-119-23-14- 0005, AND 11-119-23-11-0012) (CITY FILE NO. 23-028) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification of the City of Corcoran Zoning Map from Public/Institutional (P-I) and General Mixed Use (GMU) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), legally described as follows: See Attachment A Section 2. This amendment shall take effect upon adoption of the resolution approving the final PUD plan for this project. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Attachment Item: 8a2. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2024-513 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT A Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: Lot 1, Block 2, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 3: Outlot A, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 4: Outlot C, Serenity Meadows, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Abstract Property). City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-514 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2024-513 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 116 AND COUNTY ROAD 30 (CITY FILE 23-028) Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended to revise the City of Corcoran’s Zoning Map. A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Ordinance is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Attachment Item: 8a3. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-15 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 116 AND COUNTY ROAD 30 (PID 11-119- 23-14-0003, 11-119-23-14-0004, 11-119-23-14-0005, AND 11-119-23-11-0012) (CITY FILE NO. 23-028) WHEREAS, Hope Community Church, Brain and Jacque Lother, and Corcoran Investments LLC, (the “applicant”) requested approval to rezone 56.72 acres legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing, and; WHEREAS, the City Council adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcels from Public Institution (PI) and General Mixed Use (GMU) to Planned Unit Development (PUD); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the request for reclassification of the property, based on the following findings and conditions: 1.The planned development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Lot 1, Block 1 containing the existing church will remain guided for Public / Semi-Public development, and the rest of the proposed development is guided for mixed use development as proposed. 2.The planned development is not in conflict with the intent of the underlying zoning districts. Lot 1, Block 1 will continue to be subject to PI standards unless otherwise amended by the PUD standards. The remaining portions of the site are zoned GMU. The proposed development is not in conflict with the intent of either of these zoning districts. The plan develops the site in advance of municipal water being able to service the area; however, the applicant will not be issued a building permit until Corcoran municipal water is operational. 3.The planned development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. The PUD allows the applicant to request flexibility from the performance standards in the ordinance in exchange for a high-quality development than might otherwise be expected. 4.The planned development or unit thereof is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and/or operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other subsequent unit or phase. The project is anticipated to be completed in 4 phases that will be able to adapt to the needs of the market. Development is contingent upon completion of trunk infrastructure improvements and water service. The initial phases will include the construction of the primary project infrastructure, roadway improvements on County Road 116 and County Road 30, and other key infrastructure improvements. Agenda Item: 8a4. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-15 Page 2 of 3 5.The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing a public trail consistent with the Three River’s Diamond Lake Regional Trail master plan and the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A private tot lot that will be accessible to residents of the planned development is proposed on the church property. The residents living in assisted living, memory care, and hospice units will place lace less demand on public facilities such as streets and parks. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve the site at the developer’s expense. Corcoran municipal water is anticipated to be available at the end of 2024. The applicant anticipates applying for building permits in 2025 and will not pull a building permit prior to the availability of Corcoran water for the site. 6.The planned development will not have an adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighboring property. The planned development intentionally placed residential uses near the adjacent residential and agricultural uses to minimize the impact of the project. Should the property to the west develop in the future, it will develop for mixed residential uses, which will be compatible with the proposed uses along the western border of the PUD. 7.The quality of the building and site design proposed by the PUD plan shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, shall demonstrate higher standards, more efficient and effective uses of streets, utilities and public facilities, it shall maintain and enhance any natural resources within the development, and create a public benefit that is greater than what would have been achieved through the strict application of the primary zoning regulations. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-15 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: Lot 1, Block 2, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 3: Outlot A, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 4: Outlot C, Serenity Meadows, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Abstract Property). City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 1 of 10 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR “HOPE MINISTRIES” LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 116 AND COUNTY ROAD 30 (PID 11-119-23-14-0003, 11-119-23-14-0004, 11-119-23-14-0005, AND 11-119-23-11-0012) (CITY FILE NO. 23-028) WHEREAS, Hope Community Church, Brain and Jacque Lother, and Corcoran Investments LLC, (the “applicant”) has requested approval of “Hope Ministries” a mixed-use subdivision on the property legally described as: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the Corcoran City Council hereby approves the request for preliminary PUD plan, subject to the following conditions: 1.A preliminary planned unit development (PUD) plan is approved for “Hope Ministries”, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on October 20, 2023, and revisions received November 27, 2023, January 12, 2024, January 25, 2024, and January 30, 2024, except as amended by this resolution. 1.The preliminary PUD plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the PUD standards in the ordinance. 2.Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning and preliminary plat (Ordinance 2024-513 and Resolution 2024-17). 2.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Public Safety memo dated December 6, 2023. 3.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo for civil review dated January 24, 2024. 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo for stormwater review dated January 24, 2024. 5.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the July 27, 2023, EAW Record of Decision. 6.The applicant is subject to review and approval by Hennepin County. The applicant is required to secure all permits and approvals from the County. The applicant will continue to work with City staff to comply with requirements from the Hennepin County memo dated December 28, 2023. Attachment Item: 8a5. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 2 of 10 7.The applicant will continue to work with City staff and Three Rivers Park District to finalize the necessary trail easements and location as well as comply with requirements from the Three Rivers Park District’s memo dated January 5, 2024. 8.All uses identified in the P-I zoning district (allowed, accessory, conditional, interim, or administrative permit) are permitted on Lot 1, Block 1. a. The noted future cemetery expansion will require a site plan to be submitted as a final PUD plan. 9.Except for Lot 1, Block 1, all uses identified in the General Mixed Use (GMU) and Downtown Mixed Use zoning districts shall be permitted in this PUD. a.Shared parking for Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5 of Block 5 is approved. b.Two principal buildings on Lot 2, Block 1 are approved. 10.PUD flexibility is granted for the following: a.Development in advance of City services (water) being available to serve the project. A building permit will not be issued until Corcoran municipal water is operational. b.Reduced building setback along County Road 116 and County Road 30 of 50 feet with enhanced landscaping where 60’ with enhanced landscaping is required. c.The following lot standards apply to the commercial and multi-family buildings within Block 5 of the preliminary plat: Minimum Lot Area 25,000 square feet Minimum Lot Width 150 feet Minimum Lot Depth N/A Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks -Front, Major Roadways 50 feet with enhanced landscaping per Section 1060.070, Subd. 2(K) -Front, Other Streets 25 feet -Side and Rear None Maximum Principal Building Height -The commercial buildings cannot exceed 2-stories. -50 foot maximum at the required setback for Lot 1 and Lot 6 of Block 5 Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage 80% d.The following standards apply to the detached “villas”: Minimum Lot Area 5,285 square feet City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 3 of 10 Minimum Lot Width 44 feet Minimum Lot Depth N/A Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks -Front, Major Roadways 100 feet -Front, Other Streets 25 feet -Side 7.5 feet -Rear 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet e.The following standards apply to the attached “villas” and “rowhomes”: Attached Villas Townhomes Minimum Lot Area 14,500 square feet per unit 4,500 square feet per unit Minimum Lot Width N/A N/A Minimum Lot Depth N/A N/A Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks -Front, Major Roadways N/A 50 feet measured from the front lot line of the base lot -Front, Other Streets 25 feet measured form the front lot line of the base lot 25 feet measured from the front lot line of the base lot -Side -10 feet measured from the side lot line of the base lot -20 feet between attached structures separated by a common area -10 feet measured from the side lot line of the base lot -15 feet between attached structures separated by a common area -Rear 25 feet measured from the rear lot line of the base lot 25 feet measured from the rear lot line of the base lot Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet f.Reduced front parking setback along Oswald Farm Road as follows: i.15’ for Lot 1 and Lot 6 of Block 5 ii.10’ for Lot 2 of Block 1. g.No interior side setback required for the shared parking lot. h.Lot 1 of Block 1 is subject to the Public/Institutional (P-I) district standards. Except a tunnel connecting the Senior Housing building in Lot 1, Block 1 can encroach into the required 50’ setback. i.An encroachment easement with the City will be required. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 4 of 10 i.The remaining lots in the plat and PUD will be subject to the GMU district standards unless otherwise modified in this Resolution. j.Parking requirements are as follows: i.Villas must have 2 garage spaces and 2 driveway spaces. ii.Rowhomes must have 2 garage spaces, 2 driveway spaces, and 9 guest parking stalls. iii.Market-rate Multi-Family buildings must be parked as 2 spaces per unit. iv.Senior Housing and Active Senior buildings must be parked at 1 space per unit. v.A formal shared parking agreement must be established with Hope Community Church for overflow parking for the Senior Housing and Active Senior buildings. vi.A shared parking lot for the commercial uses is permitted should the square footage not exceed what is shown currently on the site plan. 415 spaces are required. vii.Snow storage and required bicycle parking cannot utilize parking spaces where a reduction is granted. k.The commercial parking lot can deviate from the intermediate landscaped island requirements as long as at least 6 clear pedestrian pathways are provided within the parking lot. l. Drive-through lanes on Lots 2 and 5 of Block 5 can be between the building and a frontage but must be screened per Section 1070.060, Subd. 2(J). m.Where there is a conflict in site design requirements between the GMU district and the Northeast District Design Guidelines (Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance), the Northeast District Design Guidelines prevail. i.The PUD is subject to the building design requirements of the Northeast District Design Guidelines, unless otherwise noted in this Resolution. 1.Buildings with residential uses on first floors do not need to be raised above the sidewalk elevation. 2.The garages for the detached villas can have a garage that comprises up to 70% of the street-facing linear building frontage. 3.The garages for the rowhomes must have a minimum width of 20’ and accommodate two cars. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 5 of 10 ii.The PUD is subject to the screening requirements of the Northeast District Design Guidelines. 1. Wood fencing or chain link with slats shall not be used for screening. n. The underlying landscaping requirements must be calculated on a per lot basis but can be distributed throughout the entire site instead of a per lot basis with emphasis placed on screening the perimeter of the development. i.Additional landscaping required for screening, buffering, and enhanced landscaping requirements must be located on a per lot basis. ii.Significant trees removed from the site must be replaced by a similar species as noted in the table below. Invasive species or undesirable tree species do not need to be replaced. Trees to be removed Replace With Similar NE District Options For Replacement From Preferred Tree List Elm – Siberian (Ulmus pumula) Elm -Americana (Ulmus americana) Yes Princeton Elm (Ulmus americana ‘Princeton’) Valley Forge Elm (Ulmus americana ‘Valley Forge’) New Horizon Elm (Ulmus pumila ‘New Horizon’) Patriot Elm (Ulmus wilsoniana ‘Patriot’) Box Elder (Acer negundo) No Maple – Silver (Acer saccharinum) Yes Freeman’s Maple (Acer x freemanii) Sienna Glen Maple (Acer x freemanii ‘Sienna’) Red Maple (Acer rubrum)* Sugar Maple (Acer saccharum)* Spruce – Colorado (Picea pungens) Yes Norway Spruce (Picea abies) White Spruce (Picea glauca)* Black Hills Spruce (Picea galuca var. densata) Black Spruce (Picea mariana)* Cottonwood (Populus deltoides) No Ash – Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) European Mountain Ash (Sorbus aucuparia) Yes American Mountain Ash (Sorbus americana) Showy Mountain Ash (Sorbus decora)* Fir – Balsam (Abies balsamea) Yes Balsam Fir (Abies balsamea)* Apple (Malus spp.) Yes Crabapple, ‘Adams’, ‘Calocarpa’, ‘David’, ‘Donal Wyman’, ‘Dolgo’, ‘Harvest Gold’, ‘Prairifire’, ‘Professor Sprenger’ (Malus spp.) Locust – Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos) Yes Thornless Honeylocust (Gleditsia tricanthos var. inermis)* City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 6 of 10 Willow – Black (Salix nigra) Yes Black Willow (Salix nigra)* Birch – River (Betula nigra) Yes Heritage River Birch (Betula nigra ‘Cully’) Basswood (Tilia americana) Yes American Linden or “Basswood” (Tilia americana)* Oak – White (Quercus alba) Yes White Oak (Quercus alba)* iii.Per the approved site plan for the existing cemetery approved in 2012, 8 evergreen trees must be planted between the wooded area and the south boundary of the cemetery for screening to the property to the west. o.Where there is a conflict within the General Mixed Use district standards and buffer yard requirements of Section 1060.070, Subd. 2(J), the buffer yard requirements shall prevail. p.Signage for the site is approved as follows: i.Unless modified by this Resolution, sign and setback standards in Chapter 84 apply. ii.Up to 4 monument signs are approved for the commercial buildings. iii.Each residential component is allowed to have one monument sign. iv.Wall signs can be placed on the entrance façade as well as the façade facing a county road for each commercial user, but the combined size of the signs cannot exceed 10% of the entrance façade area. 11.Park dedication shall be satisfied by a combination of land and cash-in-lieu of land for the PUD. Park dedication will be based on the park dedication ordinance in place at the time the final plat is approved. 12.Prior to submittal of the PUD final plan and final plat, revised preliminary plans must address the following: a.All plans must be consistent. b.A 50’ building setback from the new property boundary must be shown along the county roads. c.The parking must be revised to show the following: i.Compliance with the standards in this Resolution. ii.At least 6 pedestrian pathways with aligned landscape islands in the shared commercial parking lot. iii. Required landscape islands in Lot 6, Block 5. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 7 of 10 iv.Snow storage and bicycle parking that does not conflict with parking spaces must be clearly shown for the commercial and multi-family uses. d.Outlot A must be absorbed by one ore more of the surrounding properties. e.The right-in access for the commercial uses on County Road 116 must be removed. f.The twin-home building pad in Lot 8, Block 1 must be corrected so it does not conflict with a required drainage and utility easement. g.A site plan must confirm the twin-homes can accommodate a 22’ minimum driveway length as shown, or the twin-home lots and private drive will need to be adjusted to meet the 22’ minimum driveway length. h.The landscaping plan must be revised to show the following: i.Calculate the minimum required landscaping on a per lot basis which can be applied throughout the site with emphasis placed on the edges of the site. ii.All underlying shrub requirements must be included. iii. All tree and shrub species in the landscaping plan need to be from the preferred tree list within the Northeast District Design Guidelines. Substantially similar species can be approved by the City. iv.The applicant must provide a count of the number of trees of significant species to be removed and confirm the intended replacement species. v.Inclusion of a decorative fence or masonry wall of at least 3 feet but no less than 4 feet in height between parking lots and sidewalks. vi.Required screening for the existing cemetery with 8 evergreen trees planted between the existing wooded area and the south cemetery boundary. No more than 30% of one kind of evergreen tree can be used in this area. i.A third resiliency strategy must be identified. j.The lighting plan must be revised to confirm compliance with Section 1060.040. k.The grading plans must identify whether designated wetland buffers within the site are to utilize existing vegetation or if new vegetation will be established for the buffers. i.If existing vegetation is planned to be utilized, the vegetation shall be approved by the City’s wetland specialist. ii.The preliminary plans shall be revised to identify and label the wetland buffer zones and monument signs. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 8 of 10 iii.All permanent wetland buffer monuments must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. iv.The applicant shall work with City staff to finalize the location of wetland buffer monuments. l.Drainage and utility easements must be provided over all wetlands, wetland buffers and ponds. m.Drainage and utility easements shall be provided along the perimeter of all lots. 13.The following information must be confirmed with the submittal of the final PUD plan and final plat for each phase: a.Final building and site plans must be provided as each phase moves forward. i.A minimum of 5 different styles must be submitted for the detached villas. ii.A minimum of 2 different styles must be submitted for attached villas and townhomes. iii.Garage sizes must be confirmed. iv.Elevations with material percentages are required. b.Screening details of roof top equipment and ground mounted equipment must be provided. c.Details for trash enclosures to ensure compliance with 1060.020 of the Zoning Ordinance. The trash enclosures must be clearly shown on the site plans. d.Details of mechanical equipment screening in compliance with Section 1060.030 of the Zoning Ordinance. e.A minimum lot area calculation for the twin-homes and townhomes must be provided. f.The final unit mix in the Senior Housing building and required parking shall be provided. g.A formal shared parking agreement with Hope Community Church for overflow parking of the Senior Housing and Active Senior buildings. h.Details on the required plaza and open space shall be provided. i.A chloride management plan shall be provided. j.All utility facilities shall be located underground. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 9 of 10 k.Maintenace requirements for private roads shall be detailed in Homeowners Association (HOA) documents. l.For wetland buffers that must be newly established, a wetland buffer establishment plan shall be submitted identifying the establishment and maintenance procedures. 14.A sign permit is required for any signage. 15.The development shall comply with the City’s requirements regarding fire access, fire protection and fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrant, fire department connections and fire lane signage. 16.The new public streets shall follow the City’s street naming policy. 17.An encroachment agreement shall be required for all site improvements or items placed within the City rights-of-way or easements. 18.The applicant must enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement prior to release of final plat. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-16 Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENT A Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: Lot 1, Block 2, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 3: Outlot A, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 4: Outlot C, Serenity Meadows, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Abstract Property). City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-17 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMIINARY PLAT FOR “HOPE MINISTRIES” LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 116 AND COUNTY ROAD 30 (PID 11-119-23- 14-0003, 11-119-23-14-0004, 11-119-23-14-0005, AND 11-119-23-11-0012) (CITY FILE NO. 23-028) WHEREAS, Hope Community Church, Brain and Jacque Lother, and Corcoran Investments LLC, (the “applicant”) requested approval of “Hope Ministries” a mixed-use subdivision on the property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the Corcoran City Council hereby approves the request for preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1.A preliminary plat is approved to create 43 lots, “Hope Ministries”, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on October 20, 2023, and revisions received November 27, 2023, January 12, 2024, and January 25, 2024, except as amended by this resolution. 2.Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the preliminary PUD plan for “Hope Ministries”. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of the preliminary PUD plan approval (Resolution 2023-). 3.The preliminary plat must be revised per the requirements as noted in Resolution 2024- 16. 4.Park dedication is due as required by the PUD approvals, prior to the release of the final plat for recording. 5.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo for Civil Review, dated January 24, 2024. 6.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo for stormwater, dated January 24, 2024. 7.The applicant shall continue to work with City staff to incorporate comments and comply with all requirements from Three River Park District’s memo dated January 4, 2024. 8.The applicant shall continue to work with City staff to incorporate comments and comply with all requirements from Hennepin County memo dated December 28, 2023. 9.Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of the final plat. Attachment Item: 8a6. City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-17 Page 2 of 3 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of February 2024. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk City of Corcoran February 22, 2024 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-17 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: Lot 1, Block 2, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 3: Outlot A, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 4: Outlot C, Serenity Meadows, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Abstract Property). Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, City of Corcoran Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Hope Community Church Development Date: January 22, 2024 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents: 1. Hope Community Development Civil Plans by Sambatek dated 1/12/2024 Comments: General: 1. Consistent with the review process, a comment response letter shall be provided in response to the following comments provided in this Memorandum in which the applicant provides a written response to each item. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the proposed plans are subject to addition planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. 3. Final approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission must be attained before any site grading or activity may commence. 4. An encroachment agreement shall be required for all site improvements or items placed within the City ROW or easements. Plat/Easements: 1. Provide D&U easement over Pond 4N HWL and access route and Filtration 6F access route. 2. Provide trail easements along CR116 and CR30 as well as along regional trail. 3. Verify with Hennepin County that ROW dedication along CR30 is appropriate. ROW is skewed to section corners but is not 60’ at intersection of County Road 116. 4. Provide easements for all shared parking at time of site plan. 5. Provide and show easements for shared bituminous trail in Block 1. 6. Provide easements of sufficient width to account 1:1 slope for each side of trunk sanitary sewer along Hope Way. Sewer appears to reach a depth of 45.24’ in current utility plans and ROW plus easement width is only 80’. 7. Vacate all underlying easements which are no longer necessary with proposed development. 8. Easements over all water, sanitary, and storm sewer utilities not in the ROW shall be provided and reviewed at time of final plat. 9. ROW along CR116 appears consistent with previous request from Hennepin County if a 5’ trail easement is also provided. Final ROW dedication shall be reviewed and approved by Hennepin County. Attachment Item: 8a7. January 22, 2024 Hope Community Church Development Kevin Mattson, PE, City of Corcoran Public Works Director Page 2 of 5 10. Provide D&U easement over outlot A. 11. Provide sufficient easements for a 1:1 slope over trunk sanitary sewer along CR116. Sanitary sewer appears to have a depth over 40’ and buildings 7 & 8 appear to be in conflict. 12. Corcoran City Planner and Attorney shall confirm the proper designation of Block 3 Lot 1 and Block 1 Lot 3 as lots or outlots. 13. Final Three Rivers trail alignment shall be encompassed by appropriate easements for construction and maintenance. 14. A ROW stub should be provided to the upland area north of Lot 4 Block 4 to provide access should the area be developed in the future. 15. Easements shall be provided over all storm sewer pipes. Easements shall be shown on the site, utility, and storm sewer plans to ensure they are adequate. Erosion Control/SWPPP 1. Preparation of and compliance with a SWPPP shall be required for construction. 2. Final silt fence and inlet protection locations will be reviewed at Final Plat. 3. Erosion control blanket shall be used for restoration on areas with slope of 3:1 or greater. 4. Final review of erosion control BMPs, sequencing, and quantities to take place at Final Plat. Transportation 1. Maintenance requirements for private roads in Blocks 1 and 3 shall be detailed in HOA documents. 2. At time of Final Plat, a temporary access plan shall be included with the construction drawings showing how access will be maintained to the church and existing homes during the project. 3. All 28’ roads shall be signed “No Parking” on one side of the roadway with No Parking” signs required within all cul-de-sacs. Oswald Farm Road will be no parking on both sides of the roadway. Final sign location to be shown on plans and reviewed at time of Final Plat. 4. The Feasibility Study identified offsite improvements including turn lanes at the development entrances and turn lane extension of County Road 30 at County Road 116. These projects are anticipated to be City led development and at the time of the development agreement the terms of these project should be identified. 5. All parking areas shall have concrete curbing and a paved surface. 6. The regional trail is shown to cross Oswald Farms Road at the mid block location. As outlined in the City of Corcoran Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy mid-block crossings should be avoided, especially as this crossing location is also within the bend of the roadway. We would recommend the trail be kept along the south side of Oswald Farms Road. There will still be conflicts with all of the drive entrances but this would be at a stopped traffic condition. 7. If the regional trail is constructed on the south side of the roadway, a crossing to access the trail from the church was previously proposed. Because this crossing is significantly greater than the 300’ access spacing to adjacent intersections in the policy, we would recommend if needed, the crossing location be shifted southwest so it is not located at the curve of the roadway. 8. The roadways within the development are anticipated to have AADT’s of less than 9,000 trips per day and a posted speed limit equal to or less than 30 mph. All pedestrian crossings not at standard intersections or roadways crossings for the regional trail (Oswald Farms Road or southwest access road), should incorporate the following elements in accordance with the Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy. January 22, 2024 Hope Community Church Development Kevin Mattson, PE, City of Corcoran Public Works Director Page 3 of 5 This level of improvement is considered appropriate given the conditions of the development and timing of the regional trail. Additional crossing improvements may be necessary in the future as additional segments of the regional trail are constructed and this area is further utilized. a. Incorporate high visibility crosswalk markings b. Provide advanced warning crosswalk signage c. Post no parking restrictions in the locations of the crosswalks. d. Provide adequate nighttime lighting e. Incorporate curb extensions. f. Provide for RRFB system due to significant multimodal facilities 9. Construction plans to display location of surmountable and high-back curb. Locations of surmountable and high-back curb to be reviewed at Final Plat. 10. Provide plan sheet with locations of stop, street, and no parking signage in final plat drawings. 11. Provide intersection details plan demonstrating ped ramp design per ADA and Corcoran standard detail requirements in final plat drawings. 12. All pavement markings to be reviewed at Final Plat. 13. The local roadway connection to County Road 30 shall be adjusted to have both right and left turn lanes onto County Road 30. 14. At time of each individual lot plan, the ADA parking stall count and all ADA access routes to facilities shall be shown on site plans. Site Plans 1.Street lighting locations shall be reviewed by Public Safety and final lighting locations shall be determined at the time of Final Plat. 2. Include all necessary City of Corcoran standard detail plates in construction plans. 3. There is significant amount of planting conflicts over the storm sewer and trunk utilities adjacent to County Road 30 and County Road 116. At time of Final Plat, revise planting locations to minimize conflicts. 4. Tree planting should be removed from pond access routes. Plantings around Filtration 12F2 and Pond 4N appear to be in conflict. 5. Review Senior Housing building and Building 26 for conflicts with D&U easements. 6. Plantings are shown in Hennepin County ROW. Applicant shall receive approval from Hennepin County for these plantings. Grading/Stormwater 1.The grading plans shall clearly identify whether designated wetland buffers within the site are to utilize existing vegetation or if new vegetation will be established for the buffers. If existing vegetation is to be utilized, the vegetation shall be approved by the City Wetland specialist. For buffers to be established, a plan identifying the establishment and maintenance procedures shall be provided at the time of Final Plat. 2. Wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage shall be clearly identified and labeled on plans. 3.Sumps in manholes with drops of greater than 18” and the last accessible structure prior to stormwater basins to be 3’ sumps. January 22, 2024 Hope Community Church Development Kevin Mattson, PE, City of Corcoran Public Works Director Page 4 of 5 4. Rational calculations shall be provided to confirm all pipe sizes and inlet capacity at the time of final plat. 5. Label top and bottom elevations of retaining wall behind Block 2 single family homes. If greater than 4’, it shall be designed by a structural engineer. 6. Inlet and pipe capacity calculations for all roadways including Hope Way and existing storm sewer along Oswald Farm Road shall be submitted and reviewed with Final Plat application. 7. Confirm EOF (947.43) nearest the center structure of “Rowhomes J” (FFE 948.25) meets freeboard requirements of 2 foot separation. 8. Provide 10’ safety bench for all wet ponds. Pond 4N appears to be the only wet pond with a sufficient safety bench. 9. Call out trash guards for all FES on construction plans. 10. Filtration basin 12F2 may require lining to inhibit seepage to Three Rivers trail underpass; to be reviewed at final plat. 11. Additional inlets required for storm sewer system to drain all low areas below Block 2 retaining wall. 12. Catch basin capacity of all commercial and multi-family sites shall be reviewed at time of site plan/building permit and rational calculations shall be provided. At time of Final Plat concept rational calculations will be necessary to ensure stubs from street have adequate capacity. 13. Plans shall be modified to accommodate trapped water adjacent to western property boundary south of Oswald Farm Road. 14. Verify discharge location for STMH 311. 15. Existing storm sewer underneath Senior Housing that conveys drainage to existing wetland must be removed. 16. EOF in front of Multifamily A parking garage must be relocated. Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. Plan and profiles for all utilities shall be provided at the time of Final Plat submittals. 2. Valve locations to be reviewed at time of Final Plat. Generally, valves shall be located at all intersection as one less valve than the number of legs. Valves should typically be located out from the end radius points unless specific circumstances don’t allow. Butterfly valves required for watermain 12” and greater. a. Review valve midway on Hope Way. 3. Hydrant spacing to be reviewed by Public Safety at time of final plat. a. Ensure hydrants are located at all high points. 4. All water stubs from the 20-inch trunk water pipe shall have a valve and a 20-foot extension of pipe so connection can be made without shutting down the City system. 5. The sanitary sewer of Hunters Ridge sanitary stub shall be lowered to accommodate connection to existing properties. 6. Looping of the 8” watermain along the west property boundary may be necessary for required looping depending on timing of the project. 7. A dedicated lot for a future municipal well shall be coordinated with City. 8. Provide 20-foot easement and install the raw water line along CR 116 for municipal water supply. 9. Provide 20-foot easement along CR30 for future raw water supply from the west. 10. Separate domestic and fire lines shall be run into buildings with separate shut offs. January 22, 2024 Hope Community Church Development Kevin Mattson, PE, City of Corcoran Public Works Director Page 5 of 5 11. The sewer stub to the southeast shall be lowered to match the comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan identifies this sewer invert at a 920.2. Credits (if available) from the development’s TLAC would be provided for overdepth installation. 12. “20-inch” DIPS HDPE DR-11 BY OTHERS” shown on Utility Plan Sheets to be labeled 20” C900 DR18 fusible pipe. 13. Utility stubs should be provided to outside the roadway for the End of Comments Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE City of Corcoran Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE, Project: Stormwater Comments Hope Community Church Development Project Date: January 22,2024 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents: 1. Hope Community Development Civil Plans by Sambatek dated 1/12/2024 2. Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan for Hope Community Church by Sambatek dated 1/12/2024 Comments: ·Final approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) must be attained before any site grading or activity may begin. o City needs to authorize submittal to ECWMC. Summary Stormwater findings and City guidelines for developments and drainage were provided in the Feasibility Study. These should be implemented with revised stormwater management plan. Draintile 1. Include the surveyed elevations and diameter of the tile on the Existing Conditions plan sheet. 2. Submit verification of the material and condition of tile under CR 116 (video, etc.). 3. Verify capacity of rerouted tile through the site is equal or greater than existing conditions, include existing pipe material as compared to RCP (see comment No. 4). Stormsewer, EOF and Outlet Structures (OCS) 4. Pipes carrying public drainage (City, County, or offsite drainage) are required to be RCP. 5. The WMO may require an OCS with skimming on all basin outlets. 6. The site shows flat stormsewer (less than 0.5%) that may require additional manholes for maintenance access. City will review and may require additional structures for access at time of final plat. 7. Catch basin spacing of storm sewer appears to not meet City Standards. It should be anticipated that additional structures will be necessary in the streets and parking areas. 8. Provide individual detail plates for each OCS with site specific elevations. 9. The EOF for the large area south of Oswald Farm Road and south of the future tunnel is elevation 950.31. City requires low openings to be 2 feet above the EOF, therefore adjust the finished floor elevations for the four retail and medical buildings. Attachment Item: 8a8. January 2024 Hope Community Church Development Project Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 Ponds/BMPs 10. Modify the stormsewer length between OCS 931 and FES 930 to include the length of the stilling basin. Additionally, the plans should show where the pipe is being upsized per the detail. 11. The existing pond adjacent to Hope Church is receiving stormwater from the development, therefore add an OCS to manage discharge (Pond 7P) to the existing wetland and include in the system’s model. Any wetland impacts for the discharge and construction will need WCA approval. 12. Provide a minimum of 1 foot of freeboard from the HWL to the top of berm. For example Pond 5N only has 6 inches. 13. Ponds 4N, 5N, 11N and 12N do not require the berm divider in the wet ponds. 14. Create stilling basin at the FES into each filtration basin to dissipate velocity. Utilize the City detail, however the upsize in pipe is not required. Alternatively, submit a design for City review. Modeling Data 15. The capacity of the offsite driveway culverts may not be sufficient for the Hope Development system design. Therefore, it is necessary to extend the model north along CR 116 and the culvert under Hillside Drive. Include in both the existing and proposed models. The following culvert information shall be input into the model: a. Culvert under Hunters Ridge at CR 116 intersection. b. Culvert under the field access near the tree line. c. Three driveway culverts north of Pond 5N. d. Culvert under Hillside Dr at CR 116 intersection. 16. It appears a generic impervious percentage is used for proposed conditions however it is necessary to quantify the impervious areas within each subwatershed as shown on the plans. Provide both a subwatershed total and an exhibit and table of quantities of pervious, impervious, and total area for each Block and ROW as shown on Sheet 2.02 to be used as the benchmark for the WMO permitting and future development review. Model 17. Filtration basins shall be set to have a starting water elevation at the constructed outlet control elevation. 18. Wetlands shall have a starting water elevation at the elevation of the delineated edge. The existing wetland has a Flood Elevation of 937.88 in both models, not a Starting Elevation. 19. Water loss in modeling is not allowed, therefore remove the modeling approach of discarding exfiltration from the existing wetland in both models. 20. Before resubmittal, ensure all devices in the HydroCAD match the construction plan information. 21. Model filtration basins and ponds using a CN of 98. 22. Adjust routing of 11E-OS in the proposed model to discharge directly to the wetland. Offsite Drainage 23. Incorporate the drainage from the west near CR30 into the street plan. Currently the proposed road plans would block drainage from the west. Page 1 of 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@corcoranmn.gov / Web Site – www.corcoranmn.gov Memo To: Planning (Planners Lindahl and Davis McKeown) From: Sergeant Ekenberg Date: December 6, 2023 Re: City File 23-028 Hope Ministries Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary PUD Plan, Preliminary Plat A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on November 1, 2023, and December 6, 2023 to review the submitted application for the Hope Ministries preliminary plat and PUD. In attendance were: Police Chief Gottschalk, Sergeant Ekenberg, Planner Davis McKeown, Construction Services Specialist Pritchard, Fire Chief Leuer, Fire Chief Farrens, and Building Official Geske. The comments below are based on the preliminary review of the plans and are intended as initial feedback, and further plan review will need to be completed as construction plans are finalized. 1.Reduced setbacks along the County roads with smaller/scattered landscaping makes sense for fire access on the rear side of the proposed buildings. Clustered landscaping of tall trees would be ideal. 2. Courtyard standpipes should be incorporated. 3.Senior housing and apartments will need to be sprinkled. 4.Fire exits may not be able to be placed on the far side of the court yards due to the distance. 5.Hydrant and FDC are subject to approval by the Fire Chief – Patrick Farrens. 6.Need to see circulation for fire truck in the parking lot on the north end of Multi-Family F. 7.Likes to see that there is travel corridor around the Senior Housing building for ground firefighting. 8.Streets and driveways must be up to City specifications. Attachment Item: 8a9. Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340 612-596-0300 | hennepin.us December 28, 2023 Ms. Natalie Davis City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Re: Hope Community (Received 12/01/23) County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 30 & County Road (CR) 116 Hennepin County Plat Review ID #4047 (Reviewed 11/07/2023) Ms. Davis: Please consider the following county comments for the preliminary plat to combine multiple parcels in the northwest corner of County Road (CR) 30 and CR 116 into a multi-use development including multifamily and senior housing, commercial, retail and medical office. Access: We concur with the full access locations with turn lanes on CR 30 and CR 116. The turn lane design for both locations must be reviewed and approved by the county. County staff requires additional information for the proposed right in access on CR 116, including forecasted daily user volumes and rationale for the access, to determine whether or not the county will support the access. Right-of-way: County staff request 60 feet half right-of-way with an additional 5-foot easement for drainage, utility and future multi-modal purposes on CR 30 and CR 116. Staff also request a 25x25 sight triangle in the northwest quadrant of CR 30/CR 116, the northwest and southwest quadrants of CR 116/Hunters Ridge/Oswald Farm Road, and the northwest and northeast quadrants of CR 30/new access to provide sufficient sight distance and accommodate space for utilities. Multimodal: The sidewalk and curb ramp design must meet current ADA standards. In 2023, the US Access Board issued a final rule in the Federal Register for the Public Right-of-Way Access Guidelines (PROWAG). These guidelines are expected to be adopted by the Department of Transportation and Department of Justice in 2024. PROWAG, section R202.2 will require that altered facilities "be connected by a pedestrian access route complying with R302 to an existing pedestrian circulation path." Curb ramps and appropriate connections will need to comply with R302, R304 and R305, including requirement R203.6.2 that "crosswalks, curb ramps or blended transitions shall be provided on both ends of the crosswalk where the pedestrian access route crosses a curb." Depending on project timing, this may require that curb ramps are provided at all impacted intersections and a sidewalk or multiuse trail on CR 30 and CR 116 and should be taken into account in the design. Attachment Item: 8a10. County staff were recently made aware of a planned trail underpass connecting with this development under CR 116. Coordination still needs to occur for the planned trail, underpass, box culvert, and retaining wall layout and design. Site modification may need to occur to accommodate the underpass. Ownership and maintenance responsibilities will also need to be determined prior to construction of the trail underpass and planned trail currently shown on the east side of CR 116. Storm Water/Drainage: Discharge rates must remain less than existing flow rates. The county storm water system will not take water from new drainage areas. Additional treatments may be needed if flow rates cannot match existing. Contact: Jordan Labat at 612-596-0703 or Jordan.Labat@hennepin.us Permits: Please inform the developer that all construction within county right-of-way requires an approved county permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, sidewalk/trail development, and landscaping. Contact: Michael Olmstead, Permits Coordinator at 612-596-0336 or michael.olmstead@hennepin.us Please contact Ashley Morello: 612-596-0359, ashley.morello@hennepin.us with any questions. Sincerely, Carla Stueve, PE County Highway Engineer From:Ashley Morello To:Natalie Davis Cc:KC Atkins; Dwight Klingbeil Subject:RE: [External] RE: Hope Community Plat Date:Friday, January 26, 2024 11:16:48 AM Attachments:image001.png image003.png Natalie, After review and consideration, we have determined that the applicant does not meet warrantsfor the right-in. Our forecasts indicate that this segment of CR 116 has a forecasted AADT of 8400. Using ouraccess spacing guidelines (shown below), this requires ¼ mile spacing. I will also iterate that consistent with previous discussions, we need to consider the future trafficimpacts that the 610 extension will have on the area. In addition, we are planning for a future trailon CR 116, which would complement this development nicely, and increased access points willincrease potential conflict with trail users. Please let me know if you have any questions. Ashley Morello she/her Transportation Planning Office: 612-596-0359ashley.morello@hennepin.us | hennepin.us January 5, 2024 Natalie Davis McKeown City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Hope Community Church PUD Natalie, Three Rivers Park District has reviewed the preliminary PUD plans for the Hope Community Church Development Project, dated November 27, 2023, and has the following comments. 1.Plan should reflect the most current design and layout for the future regional trail and underpass from the CSAH 116 Grade Separated Crossing Feasibility Study by SRF Consulting Group. See attached plan dated December 22, 2023. 2.Plan should note the location and extent of the anticipated easement to be granted to Three Rivers Park District for the future regional trail underpass and trail, including all areas needed for construction of the underpass retaining walls, trail and trail clearzones per the Three Rivers Park District Trail Design Guidelines, updated August 11, 2023. A 55-foot-wide permanent easement area will be needed at the retaining walls for the underpass approach. 3.Filtration Pond 12F2, including all associated drainage structures and underground piping, should be designed and constructed such that it will not be impacted by the future construction of the retaining walls needed for the trail underpass approach. 4.Indicate the best connection point for electrical power for the future box culvert lighting. 5.The trail along Oswald Farm Road west of the underpass is intended to become the regional trail in the future. This trail should be meet Three Rivers’ design standards: 10’ wide, 3’ minimum trail clear zones on either side of the trail. A 6’- wide (minimum) boulevard is recommended between the trail and the street to allow space for street signage and light poles outside of the 3’-wide trail clearzone. Landscape plantings, including the expected tree branch growth, should be outside of the trail corridor, 16’ wide x 10 high. See attached TRPD Trail Design Guidelines. If the trail corridor does not fit within the road right-of- way, determine the amount of area needed for a trail easement. Attachment Item: 8a11. City of Corcoran Page 2 January 5, 2024 6.Utility manholes should be located outside of the regional trail surface. 7.Ensure there is room for all current ADA requirements for all regional trail crossings in the development, including required sight lines and pedestrian ramps. 8.Three Rivers Park District would like to acquire all necessary property rights for the trail corridor and underpass area as part of the PUD platting process. The Diamond Lake Regional Trail Cooperative Agreement between Three Rivers Park District and the City of Corcoran has sample easement/limited use permit language that could be used to convey the property rights to Three Rivers. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the preliminary PUD plans. Please contact me at 763-559- 6766 or Stephen.shurson@threeriversparks.org with any questions. Sincerely, Stephen Shurson Landscape Architect Three Rivers Park District 5.02 ACRES OSWALD FARM ROAD COUNTY ROAD #116 28 MCUnitsMCGARDEN 20083951.13UP OUINV=949.85INV=949.4720253946.52CO 10 HDPE20357953.30UP OU2 B20364952.52UP OU1 B20378953.27PED20379952.82PED20430948.86UP OU OU1 EINV=945.11INV=945.17COM COM COM COM COM OU OU OU OU OU UE UE UE UE UE UE UE CNDCNDCNDCNDCND GGGGGGGG F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O H:\Projects\17000\17062\TechData\CADDesign\Graphics\17062_Alin-Prof-231117.dwg : A-1Job # 1675012/22/2023 - 9:01AMCSAH 116 Grade Separated Crossing Feasibility StudyThree Rivers Park DistrictCorcoran, Hennepin County, MNFigure 1 4 STORIES OVER 1184 UNITSCOUNTY ROAD #11620378953.27PED20379952.82PED20489958.12CO20490958.01CO20525949.88PED20556950.08UP OUINV=950.12INV=949.5820588948.58ANC20589949.00UP OH EU BINV=948.74INV=948.97COM COM COM COM COM COMOUOUOUOUOU UEUE UE UE UE UE UE COMCNDCNDCNDCNDCND GGGGGGGF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OH:\Projects\17000\17062\TechData\CADDesign\Graphics\17062_Alin-Prof-231117.dwg : A-2Job # 1675012/21/2023 - 3:39PMCSAH 116 Grade Separated Crossing Feasibility StudyThree Rivers Park DistrictCorcoran, Hennepin County, MNFigure 2 8'-0"12'-0"VAR.12'-0"8'-0" SHLD.SHLD.LANE MED.LANE CONC. BARRIER MOMEN SLAB W/ ABUTMENT CAST-IN-PLACE PANEL APPROACH 6'-0"6'-0"1:25 1:25 5' -0"5' -0"< TRAIL END SECTION `68'-0" PRECAST BARREL SECTIONSPRECAST CONC. 14'x10' BOX CULVERT (PMBW) W/ FENCE WALLFRONT FACE RET. (PMBW) W/ FENCE WALLFRONT FACE RET. 1:25 1:25 0 10 20 FEETSCALE R=80.0' GENERAL PLAN CONC. MOMENT SLAB CONC. BARRIER & WINGWALLS CONC. ABUTMENT CONC. FOOTING CONC. APPROACH PANEL SHLD.SHLD.LANE LANE 8'-0"12'-0"VAR.12'-0"8'-6" TOP OF TRAIL TOP OF TRAIL GENERAL ELEVATION END SECTION PRECAST CONC. CULVERT BARRELS PRECAST CONC. BOX GROUNDLINE PROPOSED (BOX CULVERT) WINGWALL (TYP.) CAST-IN-PLACE GUARDRAIL (TYP.) GENERAL ELEVATION (ABUTMENT) BARRIER TOP OF CONC. & MOMENT SLAB (TYP.) TOP OF CONC. WINGWALL & MOMENT SLAB (TYP.) TOP OF CONC. ABUTMENT 9" COPINGSYSTEM TEXTURE & COLOR ARCHITECTURAL CONC.1:2 MAX. 1:2 MAX. PANEL CONC. APPROACH 14'-0"10'-0"`30'-0" WINGWALL`28'-0" ABUTMENT`30'-0" WINGWALL $DGN$$DATE$ Job #17062 Figure B1 for Three Rivers Park District In the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota Hennepin County CSAH 116 Trail Underpass - General Plan & Elevations Three Rivers Park District Trail Design Guidelines Updated August 11, 2023 *Italic text indicates TRPD modification to published standard or a new standard created by TRPD. Design Component Design Standard/Best Practice References Trail Classification = Regional Trail (2-way shared use trail) Trail Geometry Trail width (shared use path) Typically, 10’ from pavement edge to pavement edge. Trail width may be modified based on Level of Service (LOS) projections. AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual MN Rule 8820.9995 Shoulder width 5’ preferred where ROW is not constrained, 2’ minimum on both sides of trail. AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual MN Rule 8820.9995 Clear zone 3’ minimum on both sides of trail. Clear zone is measured from edge of bicycle travel lane. AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual MN Rule 8820.9995 Cross slope Typically 1.5% in one direction, with direction dependent on drainage and horizontal curvature. Minimum cross slope = 1.5%, maximum cross slope = 2.0%. 5’ for each percent of transition AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual Side slopes 2’ min @ (1:6 V:H) 1:3 (V:H) for cut and fill slopes. 1:2 fill slopes may be considered in wetland areas. 1:2 cut slopes may be considered in heavily wooded areas on a site-specific basis. No slopes steeper than 1:2. AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual MN Rule 8820.9995 Physical barrier, dense shrubbery, or railing Install when < 5’ of shoulder can be provided from the slope and Slopes 1V:3H w/ 6’+ drop Slopes 1V:3H adjacent to water body Slopes 1V:2H w/4’+ drop Slopes 1V:1H w/1’ + drop AASHTO 2012 Vertical clearance 10 feet minimum. AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual MN Rule 8820.9995 Horizontal Alignment Design Speed 20 mph for regional trails. Use a 30 mph design speed for grades longer than 500 feet and greater than 4 percent, from the uphill point where grade equals 4 percent to 500 feet beyond the downhill AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual MN Rule 8820.9995 Design Component Design Standard/Best Practice References point where the grade becomes less than 4 percent. Horizontal curves 100-foot minimum radius for 20 mph design speed, 156-foot minimum radius for 25 mph design speed. Lean angle assumed to be 15° based on typical trail user. AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual Minimum lateral clearance (M) Minimum lateral clearance on inside of horizontal curves to be free of sight obstructions. “M” is computed based on design speed, stopping sight distance, and radius of curve. Areas required to be free of obstructions will be staked prior to construction and reviewed by the project team. AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual Vertical Alignment Profile grade 5% maximum profile grade preferred on regional trail. Short segments of trail may be considered for exceeding 5% within the MnDNR allowable lengths on a case-by-case basis. AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual Vertical curves Minimum vertical curve length is computed based on design speed, stopping sight distance, and approaching profile grades. AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual Other Design Considerations Trail/Road Intersections Crossing treatments to be evaluated based on site-specific considerations, current regulatory standards, and best practices guidance. Guidance for TPRD Trail Crossings MMUTCD Intersection sightlines Intersections shall provide clear sight distance equal to the stopping sight distance computed for the trail design speed. Where it is not feasible to provide the minimum sight distance, designer should consider mitigating for trail safety, natural resources, or a combination to meet trail safety objectives. AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual Striping Trail centerline striping to be 4” yellow latex with glass beads. Broken line consists of 3’ stripe, 9’ gap. Locations of solid centerline to be determined by the designer. 4” Solid where trail is along BOC AASHTO 2012 MnDNR Trail Guidelines MnDOT Bikeway Manual Signage Signage needs to be determined by designer based on site-specific MMUTCD Safe Crossings guidance Design Component Design Standard/Best Practice References considerations and current regulatory standards. Benches/amenities/kiosks TRPD Project Team to review existing amenities along trail and provide recommendations for improvements. Pavement section Typically, 3” of bituminous over 6” of Class 5 aggregate base. Class 5 extends 1’ beyond trail edge. Trail shall be designed for a 30-year service life. Consider thicker pavement section where heavy vehicular traffic known to cross trail. TRPD standard plates TR-1 and TR-2. Curb ramps Design to meet ADA guidelines. Curb cut and truncated domes shall match trail width. MNDOT Standard Plans 5-297.250 for Pedestrian Curb Ramps Traffic control plan Trail detours and/or trail closures may be considered. Appropriate signage must be included at all local access points. Designer to provide signage/phasing plan for review by TRPD Project Team. Turf establishment Seed mix and application rate to be determined based on land type adjacent to trail. Any erosion control blanket used shall consist of all-natural netting and stitching. TRPD Specification 32 9212 & 31 2510 MNDOT Seeding Manual Reference Information -“Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2012 -“Trail Planning, Design, and Development Guidelines”, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR), 2007. -“Mn/DOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual”, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), 2020 -“Best Practices for Traffic Control at Regional Trail Crossings”, Various authors, 2011. -Minnesota Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD), July 2012. -MNDOT Seeding Manual – 2014 Edition -Guidance for Three Rivers Park District Trail Crossings, Determining Effective Trail Crossing Practices in TRPD parks and Public Rights-of-Way. December 2013 Note to designer: Any deviations from these design standards need to be documented through the TRPD project manager for incorporation into the permanent project file. Special design elements: When underpass or overpasses are required, contact TRPD project manager for additional criteria. DATE: January 25, 2024 -UPDATED TO:City of Corcoran FROM: Josh McKinney, PLA, Measure Group SUBJECT: Hope Community Development - Preliminary Plat & PUD Narrative Applicants:Hope Community Church Brian & Jacque Lother Corcoran Investments, LLC Civil Engineer:Sambatek, Mark Anderson, PE Proposal: The applicants respectfully submit the enclosed application for Preliminary Plat & Preliminary Planned Unit Development for approximately 40 acres of development located in the Northwest corner of County Road 30 & County Road 116. When Hope Community Church purchased this land over 20 years ago, their vision was to create a campus which would someday provide housing for seniors, and create a community center which would provide opportunities for commercial and medical tenants consistent with the mission of the Church. The proposed plan would provide places for people of multiple age groups to live, work, dine, and worship while being respectful of our neighbors and seeking to be a contributor toward the aspirational goals the City has set forth in multiple planning efforts. Once fully constructed, this plan would provide a variety of housing types and densities, as well as commercial, retail, and medical office space. Below is a detailed description of the development, how we propose to meet the needs of multiple user groups, and fit into the existing context while planning for the future. Attachments: Applications Preliminary PUD Plan Documents Parking Study Neighborhood Meeting Summary Phasing Plan Architectural Exhibits 1 Attachment Item: 8a12. Hope Community Development January 25,2024 Proposed Uses : Multifamily Housing ●Multifamily housing is proposed in two different locations within the site plan. ●There is significant demand for this type of housing in Corcoran caused by several factors such as home affordability and shifting preferences of multiple demographics choosing to rent vs.own. ●The proposed buildings would be 4 stories with flat roofs to lower the visual profile of the buildings.Numerous examples of this proposed use are found in nearby communities. ●The proposed buildings would incorporate indoor amenities such as community rooms,work from home spaces,coffee bars,golf simulators,game rooms,and party/ community rooms.Typical exterior amenities found in modern apartments may include a swimming pool,grill stations,firepits,pergolas,bocce courts,putting greens, and a roof deck for gatherings. ●This use is consistent with the Mixed Use guidance for the property found in the Corcoran 2040 Comprehensive Plan. ●Operationally,Market Rate apartments typically run a credit and background check for all residents.These buildings will be access restricted with Key Fobs,and have closed circuit monitoring of their facilities. ●Parking has been provided at a rate that exceeds the market. Senior Living ●Senior Living is a core component to this development.Developing Senior Living Facilities consistent with the mission of Hope Church,but also is a use that is underbuilt both in Corcoran and the west Metro given what some demographers call the “Silver Tsunami”of aging Baby Boomers reaching retirement age and in need of care.This need has been both exposed and exacerbated by the Covid 19 pandemic. ●The proposed senior living facility will provide a full continuum of care,including independent living,assisted living,memory care,and hospice. ●Modern senior living facilities include many of the same amenities found within the multifamily buildings mentioned above.In addition,there are amenities which cater specifically to senior and non ambulatory populations such as playing card rooms, barber shops,club rooms,and dining facilities. ●A tunnel is proposed to connect the church with this structure to allow for access in inclement weather. ●Any necessary overflow parking can be accommodated by sharing the existing church parking lot.We anticipate this might be where employees of the facility would park as well. 55+Active Senior Living ●Active Senior Living is intended to serve as a transition from home ownership to a facility which provides more healthcare to its residents. ●Often seniors would prefer to live with people of similar ages when they transition from owning a home to a rental community. 2 Hope Community Development January 25,2024 ●Amenities are similar to a non age restricted multifamily building,but are catered to active seniors with amenities such as Pickleball courts. ●We have included tandem parking stalls in the event that two parking spaces for a unit are desired. Senior Villas ●The Senior Villas Shown on the proposed plan would serve as another housing option for seniors as an ownership option which allows for less maintenance and a single level living. ●These villas will be owner occupied. ●These Villas would have a two stall garage and driveway parking. Row Townhomes ●Row Townhomes are an important part of what urban planners call the “Missing Middle housing”.These homes will serve as a transition for younger residents to move up into larger single family homes,as well as seniors looking for a smaller home which is more easily maintained. ●Garages will be loaded from an interior street or private drive.These garages would be 2 stalls,with driveway space for 2 additional stalls.Two areas are available for additional guest parking,totaling 8 additional stalls.These driveways would be at least 20 feet in length to avoid cars impacting sidewalk circulation. Commercial/Retail ●With the anticipated growth of Corcoran over the next several years comes the need for high quality,well located commercial and retail options.This plan provides those options with the required traffic counts and visibility for those uses to thrive. ●Potential users for this space would be a small format grocery store,coffee shops, restaurants along with community services such as barbers,banks,pharmacies,child care facilities,etc. ●While Maple Grove is a regional hub for retail and commercial space,the need for retail to serve the more localized area will become more important with the anticipated growth of the surrounding community. Medical Office ●A medical office use is consistent with the mission of the church and a focus on healing.This use is in high demand as healthcare decentralizes from large hospital campuses and instead locates specialists within medical office buildings with multiple users. ●Examples of this type of use are numerous throughout the northwest metro,including Twin Cities Orthopedic,Ridgeview,and Park Nicolett as major users. 3 Hope Community Development January 25,2024 Water Tower Site ●Hope Community Church has sold land to the City of Corcoran to construct a water tower located within the existing church site.This site is approximately 1.2 acres. Cemetery Expansion ●Hope Community Church owns an existing cemetery.Additional capacity is desired to facilitate future use for members of the community. Existing Church Use ●Hope Community Church is approximately 30,000 Square feet of worship space,office space,classrooms,and flex space.The Church has been a part of the community for over 20 years. Architecture: All buildings within the project boundary will adhere to the Northeast Area standards approved by the council within the last year,along with the zoning ordinance.It is important to note that this project is preliminary in nature and no specific building designs are available for review.We are committed to working with the City. Examples of proposed architecture have been included as an exhibit with this application. Transportation: This site is well positioned within the City of Corcoran and is served by two county roads (30 & 116),both of which are planned for expansion in the future.Additionally,the site is proposed to be served with a left turn lane from County Road 116. The second access,shown on the western property line in the southern portion of the site, shows an access which was included in the Northeast District Design Guidelines and discussed at that time with Hennepin County. We are also seeking a right-in access from southbound 116 to better serve the commercial area.This request has been submitted to the County for review. Trails: The Diamond Lake Regional Trail will bisect the property.A proposed alignment is indicated on the plan and coordination with the Three Rivers Park District is ongoing to determine specifically which side of Hunters Ridge the trail will be on.The Parks and Trails Commission preferred a mid-block crossing at the tunnel location,with the trail located on the north side of the road.Discussions with Three Rivers Parks are ongoing. Utilities : This site is in a unique position of housing the first water tower proposed in the City of Corcoran.Additionally,the water treatment facility is located directly to the north east of the site area. 4 Hope Community Development January 25,2024 Hope Community Church has worked with the City of Corcoran as a partner to site the water tower,and will continue to do so as it relates to the routing of utility lines to serve both the project area as well as our neighbors. Trunk water and trunk sanitary lines are shown routed through the site.Stormwater infrastructure will be provided to meet the City and Watershed Requirements Enhanced Landscaping/Screening: Our team has included “Enhanced Landscaping Areas”on areas of the plan where a setback reduction is requested from the county roads. Multifamily lots “A”and “F”landscape requirement trees were consolidated in conjunction with enhanced screening requirements to provide the maximum amount of building screening. Additionally,areas where the rowhomes and villas abut existing property owners have been provided with additional overstory and understory buffering using mostly native plant varieties. The areas with commercial uses require a different approach.Commercial users desire views into the site to allow for visibility of signage in retail locations.Our plan attempts to strike a balance of buffering and visibility into the site.We understand that additional screening will be required to buffer the drive thru uses from the public ROW. Signage Like any successful mixed use development,visibility and signage is important.Our team has prepared a signage plan that we feel is consistent with other quality commercial developments in the metro.Additionally,some commercial/medical users may also wish to have signage on the building facade. Buffering &Neighboring Uses : Creating a sense of community is important to the applicants.Great care was given to maintaining and enhancing vegetative buffers to reduce impacts to neighboring properties. In addition to utilizing plant material,the intensity of the proposed uses is greatly reduced near the property boundaries with residential uses.For example,a step down in intensity is shown with the 1 story senior villas near the northern property boundary ,in conjunction with the significant treeline in that area. The property to the west of the Hope Community Church site is guided as “Mixed Residential” which made the multifamily building located in that area feel appropriate,given that a similar use on the other side of that access point is possible in the future. Where appropriate,we include 6 foot privacy fencing to further enhance buffers to our neighbors. 5 Hope Community Development January 25,2024 Conformance with Previous Planning Efforts : The majority of this site is currently guided as Mixed Use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.The area with Senior Villas,55+Active Senior,and Senior Living uses is currently platted with the Church and is guided as Public/Semi-Public.A Comprehensive Plan amendment will be required to accommodate those uses. The project also referenced the Northeast District Plan and Design Guidelines while planning our transportation and trail locations.Those guidelines will continue to provide shape to the plan as this evolves with specific end users. Additionally,our team anticipates a significant amount of space designed for gathering and amenities,and plan for solar and electrical vehicles while developing individual site plans. Phasing: While the market will ultimately drive the phasing of the project,our team has prepared an exhibit for what we believe a realistic phasing plan might be.We believe that multifamily and senior housing will ultimately lead this development due to current market conditions,and utility availability. From that point we expect the retail and commercial spaces would begin to develop, followed by/or along with subsequent housing phases.See exhibit for a visual representation of this plan. We anticipate that the first building permits would likely be pulled in early 2025,however grading and utility work would commence this summer/fall.We do not anticipate permits to be pulled without watermain and sanitary sewer in place and operational. Nature of PUD Request : Our team understands a Planned Unit Development is meant to exchange flexibility for community benefit.We have made significant efforts to meet or exceed City standards, however in some areas we are challenged dimensionally due to the nature of the site.In others,we are seeking to develop in ways that are not yet considered as a part of the City of Corcoran Ordinances.We request a PUD to remediate/allow for the following: 1.Deviation in lot square footage standards for the Villa Units.These units are specifically designed to cater to seniors seeking lower maintenance,single story living. 2.Setback reduction for Multifamily and commercial buildings along County Road 116 and County Road 30.We feel this flexibility is reasonable because we would be meeting the 60’setback requirement but for the 10’foot of additional ROW being dedicated on both of those frontages.As directed by code,enhanced landscaping has been provided in the Areas of the Multifamily buildings,which are taller in height. We anticipate these buildings would be between 40 and 50’in height. 3.Joint Parking /Parking reductions per a 3rd party review of parking throughout the project area.This is requested to reduce empty/unused stalls. 4.Allowance of Townhomes in a Mixed Use district.We would like to lower the density nearest the existing residents to the extent practicable within the existing comprehensive planning guidance of the parcel. 6 Hope Community Development January 25,2024 5.Allow flexibility in density across the site area.For example,we can shift some of the available density from the townhome site to the multifamily tracts,effectively stepping down the intensity in certain areas of the site,while increasing the intensity in others. The current densities are identified on the site plan sheet. 6.Flexibility to shift required landscape material from inner portions of the site to allow for improved buffering at the edges of the site.We would like to maintain open view to wetlands and aesthetically pleasing areas,as well as preserve view corridors to the commercial areas to maintain a viable commercial area at the hard corner of our site. 7.Relief from ordinance 1040.135 which requires a grade separation on all housing units accessing the building on the first level.The building developers may well include this into their projects,however there are several different housing types on this project and this requirement is a barrier to development. 8.Flexibility from the landscape island/parking bay spacing standards found within the Northeast District Standards.This flexibility is requested to accommodate improved pedestrian access to specific buildings through the use of landscape islands. 9.Flexibility from the restriction on drive thru lanes abutting public ROW.We would like to screen these drive through lanes with vegetation. Proposed Community Benefit: 1.We have taken great care to locate taller buildings as far away from existing homes as possible,lessening impact to existing residents. 2.Constructing an east-west connection to future development,which should allow for the existing Hunters Ridge road connection to be eliminated or reduced in importance from the existing neighborhood to any future development.This idea was well received at the neighborhood meeting. 3.Coordination with City staff/consultants to shift existing ROW to allow for more economical construction of the water utility lines. 4.Improvement of existing drainage conditions for neighbors to the south of the project area through stormwater routing through the project area. 5.Establishment of a significant tax base to serve Corcoran and its residents well into the future. 6.Providing a trail easement in excess of 20 feet. 7 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 1:10:36 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C1-TITLE.DWG:C1.01 TITLE SHEET© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 JMW EJC CMA Emily Jean Castaias 10/20/2023 60741 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 2 DEVELOPER/OWNER HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH TEL 612-685-4970 EMAIL: BLOTHER@COMCAST.NET CONTACT: BRIAN LOTHER CIVIL ENGINEER SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TEL 763-476-6010 EMAIL: MANDERSON@SAMBATEK.COM CONTACT: MARK ANDERSON, PE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TEL 763-476-6010 EMAIL: JWORKMAN@SAMBATEK.COM CONTACT: JOHN WORKMAN SURVEYOR SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TEL 763-476-6010 EMAIL: MSALO@SAMBATEK.COM CONTACT: MARK SALO, RLS Preliminary PUD Plans Hope Community Church Development Project Hope Community Church Corcoran, Minnesota Presented by: VICINITY MAP N.T.S. CONSULTANT CONTACT LIST:SHEET INDEX Sheet Number Sheet Title C1.01 TITLE SHEET C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.01 PRELIMINARY PLAT C3.01 SITE PLAN C3.02 SITE PLAN - AERIAL C3.03 TRAVEL ROUTE C3.04 SIGNAGE DETAILS C4.01 GRADING PLAN C5.01 PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C6.01 UTILITY PLAN C6.02 STORM SEWER PLAN C9.01 DETAILS L0.01 TREE INVENTORY L0.02 TREE REMOVALS LIST L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.02 PLANT SCHEDULES LSI SITE LIGHTING PLAN 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 1:10:36 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C1-TITLE.DWG:C1.01 TITLE SHEETTITLE SHEET C1.01 BM NO. 1 MNDOT GSID STATION #11498 "MAMA MNDT" ELEV.=938.558 BM NO. 2 STORM MH RIM - NORTH OF CHURCH BUILDING - 12.08' FROM BACK OF CURB IN TURN AROUND LANE ELEV.=954.57 NO SCALE SITE CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (2013) MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (2018 EDITION) 94 116 BENCHMARKS GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS for 30 117 101 Attachment Item: 8a13. COUNTY ROAD NO. 116COUNTY ROAD NO. 30505050505050O S W A L D F A R M R O A D 30 OSWALD FARM RO A DOSWALD FARM ROADHUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS RIDGECOUNTY ROAD NO. 116BLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT ABLOCK 1LOT11010 10101010101030728DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PER PLAT OF HOPE PLACEDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PER PLAT OF HOPE PLACEDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PER PLAT OF HOPE PLACEDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PER PLAT OF HOPE PLACEDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PER PLAT OF HOPE PLACE10101010 303030 OUTLOT C20DRIVEWAY EASEMENT PER DOC NO. 10961288PARCEL 3PARCEL 2PARCEL 1PARCEL 4EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23WEST LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23 NORTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23WEST LINE OF THE NE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23EAST QUARTER CORNER OFSECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT798.12 768.02 FND IP 1/2"OPEN TIPPEDFND IP 1/2" OPENFND IPCAPPED 24992FND IPCAPPED 2499217.20.44.40.4 6.317.7 0.415.6 3.014.625.27.04.96.91.233.516.012.015.812.214.3 22.114.322.1N01°10'16"E 375.52 N89°11'07"W 1110.48L=181.16R=11509.16Δ=0°54'07"S89°09'42"E 523.89L=246.42R=274.55Δ=51° 2 5 ' 2 9 " N 3 9 ° 2 4 ' 4 9 " E 4 2 4 . 6 0 L=181.92R=259.86 Δ=40°06'41" L =139.92R=199.86 Δ=40°06'41" N00°41'52"W 225.36 S00°41'52"E 225.32 R=569.99 L=63.27 Δ=6°21'35" R=509.99 L=56.61 Δ=6°21'35" N05°37'44"E 150.7 7 S05°37'44"W 150. 7 7 L=162.67 R=230.15 Δ=4 0°2 9 '5 2 " L=253.8 9 R = 1 7 0 . 1 5 Δ=85°29'43"S88°52'33"E58.84S01°07'29"W 1566.14L=146.19R=214.55Δ= 3 9 ° 0 2 '21 " S 3 9 ° 2 4 ' 4 9 " W 4 2 4 . 6 0 N01°10'16"E 1346.69 S82°21'31"E 663.73N20° 0 9 ' 1 1 " E 3 5 0 . 2 6 Δ =30°02'46"R =216.99L=113.79S23°4 5' 3 7 " E 2 4 7. 2 0 R=264.93 Δ =1 3 °4 3 '2 0 "L=6 3 .4 5 N00°24'16"E 122.46 S88°14'43"E 269.45N89°37'19"E 280.11S01°07'29"W 614.03 L=2 19.64R=276.99Δ=45°25'58"N23°4 5' 3 7 " W 2 4 7. 2 0 L=232.90R=204.93Δ=65°06'56"N88°52'33"W100.00N88°52'33"W 297.984 1 2 . 0 6 1 2 . 5 468.95.219.84 . 3 20.61 . 4 3.65. 4 19.84. 0 12.31 . 9 7.51. 80.921.85.021.921.917.64.02 1 . 13.917.621.922.05.022.60.71.98.22 . 112.44 . 119.93. 6 25.45 . 319.54. 7 45.93. 823.04 9 . 1 28. 8 28.431.328.630303030ROAD CROSSES INTO PROPERTY ANDDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT(SURVEY NOTE #4)49.466.249.865.9COURTYARDPER AERIALWETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022EXISTING BUILDINGS950 9 5 0955955 9 4 7948949949949949 9 4 9 9 5 19519 5 2952953953954954 945 95095095094 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 95 1 951 9 5 1 95 0 9 4 6 94 7 9 4 8 94 9 95 1 95 2 945 950 946 947 948 949 951 952 9529529 5 0 9 5 5 9 4 6 94 7 94 8 9 4 9 9 5 1 9 5 2953954945950941942943944946947948949 955953953954954956957955953953 954956957955954945 950 942 943 944 9 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 949 951 95 2 9 4 0 9459 3 9 9419429439449469479489469 4 7 948 945 946 947 948 945 94 5 94 4 944946 946 947 94 6 9479 4 5 9509 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 948949951 952 950 951 951 952 952 953 95 3 945950950 950 946 947948949951 951951 952 952 953 953954954 945945945942943944946946946947947947948948949949949 949 940936937938939941945950955 943 944 946 947 948 949951952953954956 957 9 5 8 9 5 0 9469479489499 5 1 9 5 2 9 5 3 954945945950944944946946947947948948949943944940940 938939 945 950 946 947 948 949 951 952 953 955953954955951951951951 952 953953 953 954954954 956950955 946947948949951 951 951952 952 952 952953953 953954 950 951 9 5 2 952 953 950 949935940945 93293393493693793893994194294394494694794894595095094 3 944946947948949951951945 950 942 943 944 946 947 948 949 945 950941942 943 944 94 6 947 948 949 94 5 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 948 945942943944946947948 949949 9499259309359409 4 5 9269279289299319329339349369379389399419429439449469479489489489519519529529529529 5 3 9539539549 5 4 954950955960946947948949951952953954956957958959961 N89°09'42"W 229.06N00°43'18"E 182.02 N44°55'08"E 110.76S44°57'22"E 368.02S37°28'56"E 136.96IE:947.51RE:948.68IE:945.73IE:946.6012" CMPRE:948.51IE:945.39NEIE:945.29WIE:945.20SE*1 2 " R C P12" RCP12" RCPRE:948.59IE:945.29NW*IE:945.70SE*12" D R A I N T I L E A P P R O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N (PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)30 SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: Lot 1, Block 2, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 3: Outlot A, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 4: Outlot C, Serenity Meadows, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) The lands surveyed, shown, and described hereon are the same lands as described in the title commitment provided by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, Commitment No. 67161, dated September 21st, 2022. DESCRIPTION 1.Subject property's addresses and property identification numbers are as follows: Parcel 1: 11-119-23-14-0003, 19904 Oswald Farm Road Parcel 2: 11-119-23-14-0004, 19951 Oswald Farm Road Parcel 3: 11-119-23-14-0005, Address Unassigned Parcel 4: 11-119-23-11-0012, Address Unassigned 2.The gross area of the subject property is 54.150 Acres or 2,358,793 Square Feet. Parcel 1: 4.077 Acres or 177,611 Square Feet Parcel 2: 28.968 Acres or 1,261,844 Square Feet Parcel 3:15.709 Acres or 684,304 Square Feet Parcel 4: 5.396 Acres or 235,034 Square Feet 3.The subject property is zoned as follows per zoning map on the City of Corcoran website adopted June 2011 and updated September 2020. Parcels 1, 3, and 4: General Mixed Use (GMU) Parcel 2:Public/Institutional (P-I) 4.The building(s) and exterior dimensions of the outside wall at ground level are shown on the survey. It may not be the foundation wall. PROPERTY SUMMARY 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 10:59:36 AML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C2-EXCND.DWG:C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS C2.01 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 10:59:36 AML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C2-EXCND.DWG:C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 Mark R. Salo 1/12/2024 43933 1 1/12/2024 City Resubmittal 54.0 9 36.0 9 62.4 7 197. 6 2 O SW A L D F A R M R O A DOSWALD FARM ROADHUNTE R S RI D G E EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23WEST LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23 EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23EAST QUARTER CORNER OFSECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENTWETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HOPE WAYS01°07'29"W 646.07 S 3 9 ° 2 4 ' 4 9 "W 3 5 8 . 2 3L=146.19Δ=39°02' 2 1 "N89°09'42"W 229.06375.52 60.00 746.89 N01°10'16"E 1782.21 132.56 S10°32'4 6 " W 1 3 4 . 9 7 S09°15'49 " W 1 3 6 . 1 9 S07°58'51" W 1 3 6 . 4 0 S06°41'53"W 1 3 5 . 6 0 S05°24'56"W 13 3 . 8 0 S04°07'58"W 130.9 8 N02°51'00"E 127.14 N01°34'03"E 122.27 S00°17'05"W 116.37 S00°59'52"E 109.41 N02°16'50"W 101.38 N01°06'40"E 74.56 S01°05'28"W 124.00 S01°05'28"W 124.00 S01°05'28"W 124.00 S01°05'28"W 124.00 S88°52'33"E 258.58N66°14'23"E 193 .61N66°14'23"E 209 .55N66°14'23"E 166 .22S82°21'31"E 663.7345.1644.8844.9945.122.71 66.19S01°07'29"W 35.28 S23°45' 3 7 " E 2 1 6. 2 3 89.81 45.00 45.00 N20° 0 9 ' 1 1 " E 3 5 0 . 2 6 33.72 L =1 6 3 .8 3 R =2 76.99Δ=33°53'20"N23°45' 3 7 " W 2 1 6. 2 3 R =2 6 5.0 0 Δ =2 4 °5 3 '0 6 " L =1 1 5 .1 0S01°07'29"W 35.28 N88°52'33"W 264.33N88°52'33"W 264.33Δ =3 0°02'46"R =216.99L=113.79N00°24'16"E 122.46 S88°14'43"E 269.45N89°37'19"E 280.11S01°07'29"W 2240.17 908.33 201.59 456.22 N88°50'17"W 170.36N01°06'22"E 201.43 S88°53'38"E 170.42164.655.77N44°10'11"W 188.16S01°07'29"W 646.07 L = 177.09 R=265.00 Δ=38°17'20"C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C1543.6144.8845.1244.9977.5157.4145.9846.30129.4845.0645.0145.0145.0680.24S45°01'54"E 266.72S46°30'46"E 77.46N89°24'22"E 17.36 N 4 4 ° 5 6 ' 1 6 " E 1 6 8 . 1 0S44°50'45"E 115.00S 4 5 ° 0 1 ' 4 1 "W 1 9 6 . 1 8 S01°08'20"W 147.56 N81°42'07"E 452.64N65°06'39"E 184 .55 N01°10'16"E 374.89 S89°09'42"E 463.89L=246.42R=274.55Δ=51°25'29"N00°46'31"E 174.59 S89°28'09"E 141.85N90°00'00"E 136.55S00°00'00"E 177.25 S00°46'31"W 406.37 S44°03'36"E 40.85S00°46'31"W 375.95 L=29.24Δ=6°06'07"L=157.31Δ=32°49'44"N 3 9 ° 2 4 ' 4 9 " E 3 5 8 . 2 3 L=60.80 Δ =16°59'34" L=76.20Δ=21°17'46" L=135.81Δ=29°21'50" L = 4 1.2 8 Δ = 8°5 5'30"374.51L=121.15Δ=0°36'11"L=181.16R=11509.16Δ=0°54'07"N89°11'07"W 1110.4877.00172.21280.79195.971 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 4 5 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 7 654 8 9 L2L3L4 L5 L6L7 L8L9L10L11L12L13L14L15L16L17 L18 L19L20 L21L22 L23L24 L25Line Table Line # L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 Length 64.00 30.00 64.00 30.00 64.00 30.00 64.00 30.00 30.00 64.00 30.00 64.00 30.00 64.00 30.00 64.00 30.00 64.00 30.00 64.00 30.00 64.00 30.00 64.00 Direction S78°00'13"E S11°59'47"W N78°00'13"W N11°59'47"E S78°00'13"E N11°59'47"E N78°00'13"W S11°59'47"W S7°19'43"E N82°40'17"E N7°19'43"W S82°40'17"W S7°19'43"E S82°40'17"W N7°19'43"W N82°40'17"E S10°36'54"W S79°23'06"E N10°36'54"E N79°23'06"W N10°36'54"E N79°23'06"W S10°36'54"W S79°23'06"E 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 R=2 0 5 .0 0 Δ =2 4 °5 3 '0 6 "L =8 9 .0 4 3 N88°52'33"W 255.69N88°52'33"W 255.69L=652.41R=2206.77Δ=16°56'21"L=645.25R=2146.77Δ=17°13'16"R=420.00 Δ=6°54'21"L=50.62R=480.00Δ=6°54'21"L=57.85S01°07'31"W 205.00 N01°07'31"E 205.00 S01°07'31"W 205.00 N01°07'31"E 205.00S88°54'11"E 106.00N88°54'11"W 106.00N01°07'31"E 205.00 S01°07'31"W 205.00 S23°45' 3 7 " E 2 2 9. 0 0 N23°45' 3 7 " W 2 2 9. 0 0 N76°57'32"W 154.01S76°57'32"E 154.00N76°57'32"W 205.00S76°57'32"E 205.00N88°52'29"W 49.00S88°52'29"E 49.00N88°52'29"W 49.00S88°52'29"E 49.00N88°52'29"W 49.00S01°05'49"W 47.00 N01°05'49"E 47.00 S66°14'23"W 49 .00N66°14'23"E 49 .00 N13°02 ' 2 8 " E 49.00 S13°02' 2 8 " W 49.00 S13°02' 2 8 " W 47.00 N13°03 ' 0 6 " E 47.00L=281.95R=2206.77Δ=7°19'14"COUNTY ROAD NO. 116 COUNTY ROAD NO. 116 270.1110.00 10.00 N00°43'18"E 182.02 N89°09'42"W 294.48N 4 4 ° 5 5 ' 0 8 " E 1 1 0 . 7 6 S44°57'22"E 368.02L =1 36.99 R=205.00 Δ=38°17'20" 1 2 3 4 5 67 8 2 3 ROAD 2 45.7045.4745.1545.291 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 OUTLOT A2 3 4 5 6 86.50366.14613.77 ROAD 1 145.86 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO.REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/30/2024 2:41:51 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SURVEY\SHEETS\51372-PPLAT.DWG:PRELIMINARY PLAT© 2021 Sambatek DATE ISSUED HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/30/2024 2:41:51 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SURVEY\SHEETS\51372-PPLAT.DWG:PRELIMINARY PLAT24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/30/2024 2:41:51 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SURVEY\SHEETS\51372-PPLAT.DWG:PRELIMINARY PLATPRELIMINARY PLAT C2.02 per Guaranty Commercial Title title commitment, file number 67161: Outlot A, Hope Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Outlot C, Serenity Meadows, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) Replatted properties: Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, HOPE PLACE SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. TOTAL SITE AREA: PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY: 2,471,722 S.F. 267,484 S.F. NUMBER OF LOTS: AVERAGE LOT SIZE: MINIMUM LOT SIZE: MAXIMUM LOT SIZE: 45 48,983 S.F. 1,920 S.F. 566,409 S.F. 1.THE PROPOSED NAME OF THE PLAT IS TO BE DETERMINED 2.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 3.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO 1 FOOT ABOVE THE HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONDS. 4.WETLANDS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY WERE DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 9/15/2022 AND LOCATED ON 9/27/2022 DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY LOT SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT NOTES HOPE MINISTRIES PRELIMINARY PLAT 1.This survey was prepared utilizing Title Commitment No. 67161 by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company , bearing an effective date of 09/22/2022. 2.The bearing system is based on the Hennpin County coordinate system, NAD83 (1986 Adjust), with an assumed bearing of South 01 degrees 07 minutes 29 seconds West for the East line of the NE 1/4 , Section 11 , Township 119 , Range 23. 3.Field work was completed on 09/11/2022. SURVEY NOTES EJH/JJA MRS 10/09/2023 LOT AREA TAB BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. 10 5 5 10 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: (NOT TO SCALE) Mark R. Salo 1/30/2024 43933 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 4 5 7 654 8 9 3 1 2 3 4 5 67 8 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 OUTLOT A2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT ABLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT CPARCEL 3PARCEL 2PARCEL 1PARCEL 4WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/202220386961.39GM>>>>>>>>UEUE UE >> EXISTING POND HWL: 947.47 NWL: 947.00 P O N D 1 2 N HW L : 9 4 6 . 8 0 NW L : 9 4 3 . 5 0 POND 13N HWL:948.52 NWL:946.50 EXISTING CEMETERY SWALE O S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNT E R S RI D G E HUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROADPOND 5NHWL:940.50NWL:938.50FILTRATION 6FHWL: 940.04POND 11N HWL:948.91 NWL:945.60 FILTRATION 11F HWL:948.91 FILTRATION 12F2HWL:946.59F I L T R A T I O N 1 2 F 1 HW L : 9 4 6 . 7 1COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAYTOT LOT POND 2NHWL:946.31NWL:944.00POND 4NHWL:948.67NWL:944.00SENIOR HOUSING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F.PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 28,800 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 31,300 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. FFE=952.00 PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 8 UNITS FFE=948.254 UNITSFFE=951.0051 UNITS 5.52 ACRES 3.40 ACRES 5.65 ACRES 4.25 ACRES 122 UNITS IL/AL FFE=953 / GFE=942 184 UNITS FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FFE=952.00 1.2 ACRES 8 UNITS FFE=949.75 8 UNITSFFE=949.50 / LFE=941.508 UNITS FFE=948.50 28 MC Units MC GARDEN ACTIVE SENIOR 110 UNITS FFE=953 GFE=942 12345678910111213141516171819202223242526219 UNI T S FFE=9 5 2. 2 5 6 UNITSFFE=952.50LFE=944.50FFE=954 GFE=943 FILTRATION 3FHWL: 945.20REQUIRED AVG 35'BUFFER: 51751 SFEXISTING WETLAND HWL: 938.56 NWL: 937.88 148 UNITS 40,355 S.F. FFE=954.00 PROVIDED BUFFER:57281 SFPROPOSED MULTIFAMILY "A" PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROO F O F P A R KI N G 50.0' 50.0'50.0'50.0'120.0' ROW 10.0' PROPOSED ROW 100.0' EXISTING ROW 15 10 9 12 10 10 2214 11 18 18 16 27 12 11 14 4 10 10 14 7 11 14 128 8 12 22 30 30 29 14 15 30 10 30 15 6.0' 5.0' 28.0' 28.0'28.0 '10.0 '5.0 '10.0 '5.0 ' 5.0' 6.0' 36.0' 6.0' 5.0' 5' TRAIL EASEMENT 15:1 TAPER ON TURN LANE 55:1 TAPER ON THRU LANE 12' LANES 300' TURN LANE W/ 180' TAPER R30.0'R30 . 0 ' 55:1 TAPER ON THRU LANE 8' PAVED SHOULDER TURN LANE FOR RIGHT IN ACCESS 9 1515 15 15 158 4 29 11 13 23 6 19 10 B B A A A A A A C C C D E E E E C C F 7 D&U EASEMENT SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH BUILDING USE FOOTPRINT LOT AREA UNITS DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY "A"40,380 SF 4.25 AC (185,159 SF)148 UNITS 34.82 UNITS/AC RETAIL "B"10,100 SF 1.59 AC (69,129 SF)6,364 SF/AC MEDICAL "C" (2 STORIES)31,300 SF 1.13 AC (49,096 SF)27,771 SF/AC MEDICAL "D" (2 STORIES)28,800 SF 6.50 AC (283,173 SF)4,430 SF/AC RETAIL "E"10,000 SF 0.79 AC (34,335 SF)12,687 SF/AC MULTI-FAMILY "F"51,000 SF 5.45 AC (237,202 SF)184 UNITS 33.76 UNITS/AC SENIOR HOUSING +46,007 SF 132 UNITS* ACTIVE SENIOR 23,000 SF 6.96 AC (303,046 SF)110 UNITS 37.37 UNITS/AC VILLAS "I"49,920 SF 12.53 AC (545,608 SF)26 UNITS 2.08 UNITS/AC ROWHOMES "J"45,000 SF 5.38 AC (234,128 SF)51 UNITS 9.49 UNITS/AC *MEMORY CARE UNITS EXCLUDED TOTAL COMMERCIAL 80,200 SF 10.01 AC TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 257,927 SF 34.57 AC 651 UNITS DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY PARKING CODE SENIOR HOUSING: 1.5 PER DWELLING MULTIFAMILY:2 PER DWELLING RETAIL:8 SPACES + 1 PER 200 SF MEDICAL:8 SPACES + 1 PER 200 SF BUILDING USE PARKING REQ.PARKING PROVIDED MULTI-FAMILY "A"296 STALLS 296 STALLS RETAIL "B"50 STALLS 415 STALLS (SHARED*) MEDICAL "C"165 STALLS 415 STALLS (SHARED*) MEDICAL "D"152 STALLS 415 STALLS (SHARED*) RETAIL "E"50 STALLS 415 STALLS (SHARED*) MULTI-FAMILY "F"368 STALLS 368 STALLS SENIOR HOUSING 198 STALLS 174 STALLS (1.43:1) ACTIVE SENIOR 165 STALLS 146 STALLS (1.33:1) TOTAL COMMERCIAL 417 STALLS 415 STALLS TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 1,027 STALLS 984 STALLS *JOINT FACILITIES UTILIZED FOR A 10% REDUCTION SITE PLAN C3.01 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE SAW CUT LINE BOLLARD PARKING STALL COUNT## 1 KEY NOTE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE CURB BUILDING LINE SIGN A.SIGN TYPE "A" B.SIGN TYPE "B" C.SIGN TYPE "C" D.GATEWAY PYLON SIGN E.COMMERCIAL BUILDING SIGNAGE F.OVERHEAD PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL KEY NOTES 15' POND OUTLET ACCESS 10' POND MAINTENANCE BENCH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/30/2024 3:15:48 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C3-SITE.DWG:C3.01 SITE PLAN© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 JMW EJC CMA Emily Jean Castaias 10/20/2023 60741 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 4 5 7 654 8 9 3 1 2 3 4 5 67 8 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 OUTLOT A2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT ABLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT CPARCEL 3PARCEL 2PARCEL 1PARCEL 4WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/202220386961.39GM>>>>>>>>UEUE UE >> EXISTING POND HWL: 947.47 NWL: 947.00 P O N D 1 2 N HW L : 9 4 6 . 8 0 NW L : 9 4 3 . 5 0 POND 13N HWL:948.52 NWL:946.50 EXISTING CEMETERY SWALE O S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNT E R S RI D G E HUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROADPOND 5NHWL:940.50NWL:938.50FILTRATION 6FHWL: 940.04POND 11N HWL:948.91 NWL:945.60 FILTRATION 11F HWL:948.91 FILTRATION 12F2HWL:946.59F I L T R A T I O N 1 2 F 1 HW L : 9 4 6 . 7 1COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAYTOT LOT POND 2NHWL:946.31NWL:944.00POND 4NHWL:948.67NWL:944.00SENIOR HOUSING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F.PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 28,800 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 31,300 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. FFE=952.00 PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 8 UNITS FFE=948.254 UNITSFFE=951.0051 UNITS 5.52 ACRES 3.40 ACRES 5.65 ACRES 4.25 ACRES 122 UNITS IL/AL FFE=953 / GFE=942 184 UNITS FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FFE=952.00 1.2 ACRES 8 UNITS FFE=949.75 8 UNITSFFE=949.50 / LFE=941.508 UNITS FFE=948.50 28 MC Units MC GARDEN ACTIVE SENIOR 110 UNITS FFE=953 GFE=942 12345678910111213141516171819202223242526219 UNI T S FFE=9 5 2. 2 5 6 UNITSFFE=952.50LFE=944.50FFE=954 GFE=943 FILTRATION 3FHWL: 945.20REQUIRED AVG 35'BUFFER: 51751 SFEXISTING WETLAND HWL: 938.56 NWL: 937.88 148 UNITS 40,355 S.F. FFE=954.00 PROVIDED BUFFER:57281 SFPROPOSED MULTIFAMILY "A" PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROO F O F P A R KI N G 50.0' 50.0'50.0'50.0'120.0' ROW 10.0' PROPOSED ROW 100.0' EXISTING ROW 15 10 9 12 10 10 2214 11 18 18 16 27 12 11 14 4 10 10 14 7 11 14 128 8 12 22 30 30 29 14 15 30 10 30 15 6.0' 5.0' 28.0' 28.0'28.0 '10.0 '5.0 '10.0 '5.0 ' 5.0' 6.0' 36.0' 6.0' 5.0' 5' TRAIL EASEMENT 15:1 TAPER ON TURN LANE 55:1 TAPER ON THRU LANE 12' LANES 300' TURN LANE W/ 180' TAPER R30.0'R30 . 0 ' 55:1 TAPER ON THRU LANE 8' PAVED SHOULDER TURN LANE FOR RIGHT IN ACCESS 9 1515 15 15 158 4 29 11 13 23 6 19 10 B B A A A A A A C C C D E E E E C C F 7 D&U EASEMENT SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH SITE PLAN - AERIAL C3.02 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/30/2024 3:15:48 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C3-SITE.DWG:C3.02 SITE PLAN - AERIAL© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 JMW EJC CMA Emily Jean Castaias 10/20/2023 60741 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 2 BLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT ABLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT CPARCEL 3PARCEL 2PARCEL 1PARCEL 4WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/202220386961.39GM>>>>>>>>UEUE UE >> EXISTING POND HWL: 947.47 NWL: 947.00 P O N D 1 2 N HW L : 9 4 6 . 8 0 NW L : 9 4 3 . 5 0 POND 13N HWL:948.52 NWL:946.50 EXISTING CEMETERY SWALE O S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNT E R S RI D G E HUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROADPOND 5NHWL:940.50NWL:938.50FILTRATION 6FHWL: 940.04POND 11N HWL:948.91 NWL:945.60 FILTRATION 11F HWL:948.91 FILTRATION 12F2HWL:946.59F I L T R A T I O N 1 2 F 1 HW L : 9 4 6 . 7 1COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAYTOT LOT POND 2NHWL:946.31NWL:944.00POND 4NHWL:948.67NWL:944.00SENIOR HOUSING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F.PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 28,800 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 31,300 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. FFE=952.00 PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 8 UNITS FFE=948.254 UNITSFFE=951.0051 UNITS 5.52 ACRES 3.40 ACRES 5.65 ACRES 4.25 ACRES 122 UNITS IL/AL FFE=953 / GFE=942 184 UNITS FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FFE=952.00 1.2 ACRES 8 UNITS FFE=949.75 8 UNITSFFE=949.50 / LFE=941.508 UNITS FFE=948.50 28 MC Units MC GARDEN ACTIVE SENIOR 110 UNITS FFE=953 GFE=942 12345678910111213141516171819202223242526219 UNI T S FFE=9 5 2. 2 5 6 UNITSFFE=952.50LFE=944.50FFE=954 GFE=943 FILTRATION 3FHWL: 945.20REQUIRED AVG 35'BUFFER: 51751 SFEXISTING WETLAND HWL: 938.56 NWL: 937.88 148 UNITS 40,355 S.F. FFE=954.00 PROVIDED BUFFER:57281 SFPROPOSED MULTIFAMILY "A" PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROO F O F P A R KI N G Pumper Fire Truck Pumper Fire TruckPumper Fire Truck Pumper F ire TruckPumper Fire TruckPumper Fire TruckP u m p e r F i r e T r u c kPumper Fire TruckPumper Fire TruckPumper Fire Truck40 8 22 Pumper Fire Truck Overall Length 40.000ft Overall Width 8.167ft Overall Body Height 7.745ft Min Body Ground Clearance 0.656ft Track Width 8.167ft Lock-to-lock time 5.00s Max Wheel Angle 45.00° SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV.Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:43:26 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C3-ROUTE.DWG:C3.03 TRAVEL ROUTE© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 JMW EJC CMA Emily Jean Castaias 10/20/2023 60741 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH TRAVEL ROUTE C3.03 PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE SAW CUT LINE BOLLARD CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE CURB BUILDING LINE SIGN PEDESTRIAN ROUTE PUBLIC SIDEWALK SHARED BITUMINOUS ROUTE SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:40:07 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C3-SIGN.DWG:C3.04 SIGNAGE DETAILS© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 JMW EJC CMA Emily Jean Castaias 10/20/2023 60741 SIGNAGE DETAILS C3.04 TYPE A MONUMENT SIGN 1/2" = 1'-0"6' MAX.36" (75% OF WIDTH) CAPSTONE SIGN FACE; STUCCO SIGN COPY AREA; 10 SF (MAX 32 SF) BASE; GREY CONCRETE LETTERS EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED 1 P-HO-01C3.04 TYPE B MONUMENT SIGN 1/2" = 1'-0"6' MAX.9' (75% OF WIDTH) CAPSTONE SIGN FACE; STUCCO SIGN COPY AREA; 24 SF (MAX 32 SF) LETTERS EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SILL (MATCH CAPSTONE SIGN FACE; BRICK OR FIELDSTONE VENEER BASE; GREY CONCRETE 2 P-HO-02C3.04 TYPE C MONUMENT SIGN 1/2" = 1'-0"16' MAX.8' CAPSTONE SIGN FACE; STUCCO SIGN COPY AREA; 27 SF (MAX 64 SF) LETTERS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SILL (MATCH CAPSTONE) SIGN FACE, BRICK OR FIELDSTONE VENEER 3 P-HO-03C3.04 GATEWAY PYLON SIGN 1/2" = 1'-0"16' MAX.13' CAPSTONE SIGN FACE; STUCCO SIGN COPY AREA; 64 SF (MAX 64 SF) CHANNEL LETTER ILLUMINATION SILL (MATCH CAPSTONE) PYLON SUPPORTS, BRICK OR FIELDSTONE VENEER BASE, GREY CONCRETE 4 P-HO-04C3.04 COMMERCIAL BUILDING SIGN 3/16" = 1'-0" SIGNAGE SIGN COPY; CHANNEL LETTER ILLUMINATION SIGN AREA; 10% MAX OF PRIMARY BUILDING FACE.TRANSIT ORIENTATED PRIMARY BUILDING FACE 5 P-HO-05C3.04 FRONT DOOR COMMERCIAL BUILDING SIGN 3/16" = 1'-0" SIGNAGE SIGN COPY; CHANNEL LETTER ILLUMINATION SIGN AREAS; TOTAL COVERAGE MAY NOT EXCEED 10% MAX OF PRIMARY BUILDING FACE.FRONT DOOR - PRIMARY BUILDING FACE SIGNAGE C3.04 P-HO-06 6 COUNTY ROAD NO. 116COUNTY ROAD NO. 30O S W A L D F A R M R O A D OSWALD FARM RO A DOSWALD FARM ROADHUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS RIDGECOUNTY ROAD NO. 116BLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT ABLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT CPARCEL 3PARCEL 2PARCEL 1PARCEL 4WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022950 9 5 0955955 9 4 7948949949949949 9 4 9 9 5 19519 5 2952953953954954 945 95095095094 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 95 1 951 9 5 1 95 0 9 4 6 94 7 9 4 8 94 9 95 1 95 2 945 950 946 947 948 949 951 952 9529529 5 0 9 5 5 9 4 6 94 7 94 8 9 4 9 9 5 1 9 5 2953954945950941942943944946947948949 955953953954954956957955953953 954956957955954945 950 942 943 944 9 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 949 951 95 2 9 4 0 9459 3 9 9419429439449469479489469 4 7 948 945 946 947 948 945 94 5 94 4 944946 946 947 94 6 9479 4 5 9509 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 948949951 952 950 951 951 952 952 953 95 3 945950950 950 946 947948949951 951951 952 952 953 953954954 945945945942943944946946946947947947948948949949949 949 940936937938939941945950955 943 944 946 947 948 949951952953954956 957 9 5 8 9 5 0 9469479489499 5 1 9 5 2 9 5 3 954945945950944944946946947947948948949943944940940 938939 945 950 946 947 948 949 951 952 953 955953954955951951951951 952 953953 953 954954954 956950955 946947948949951 951 951952 952 952 952953953 953954 950 951 9 5 2 952 953 950 949935940945 93293393493693793893994194294394494694794894595095094 3 944946947948949951951945 950 942 943 944 946 947 948 949 945 950941942 943 944 94 6 947 948 949 94 5 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 948 945942943944946947948 949949 9499259309359409 4 5 9269279289299319329339349369379389399419429439449469479489489489519519529529529529 5 3 9539539549 5 4 954950955960946947948949951952953954956957958959961 IE:947.51RE:948.68IE:945.73IE:946.6012" CMPRE:948.51IE:945.39NEIE:945.29WIE:945.20SE*1 2 " R C P12" RCP12" RCPRE:948.59IE:945.29NW*IE:945.70SE*(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)EXISTING POND HWL: 947.47 NWL: 947.00 P O N D 1 2 N HW L : 9 4 6 . 8 0 NW L : 9 4 3 . 5 0 POND 13N HWL:948.52 NWL:946.50 EXISTING CEMETERY SWALE O S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNTE R S RI D G E HUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROADPOND 5NHWL:940.50NWL:938.50FILTRATION 6FHWL: 940.04POND 11N HWL:948.91 NWL:945.60 FILTRATION 11F HWL:948.91 FILTRATION 12F2HWL:946.59F I L T R A T I O N 1 2 F 1 HW L : 9 4 6 . 7 1COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAYTOT LOT POND 2NHWL:946.31NWL:944.00POND 4NHWL:948.67NWL:944.00SENIOR HOUSING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F.PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 28,800 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 31,300 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. FFE=952.00 PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 8 UNITS FFE=948.254 UNITSFFE=951.0051 UNITS 5.52 ACRES 3.40 ACRES 5.65 ACRES 4.25 ACRES 122 UNITS IL/AL FFE=953 / GFE=942 184 UNITS FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FFE=952.00 1.2 ACRES 8 UNITS FFE=949.75 8 UNITSFFE=949.50 / LFE=941.508 UNITS FFE=948.50 28 MC Units MC GARDEN ACTIVE SENIOR 110 UNITS FFE=953 GFE=942 12345678910111213141516171819202223242526219 UNI T S FFE=9 5 2. 2 5 6 UNITSFFE=952.50LFE=944.50FFE=954 GFE=943 FILTRATION 3FHWL: 945.20REQUIRED AVG 35'BUFFER: 51751 SFEXISTING WETLAND HWL: 938.56 NWL: 937.88 148 UNITS 40,355 S.F. FFE=954.00 PROVIDED BUFFER:57281 SFPROPOSED MULTIFAMILY "A" PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROO F O F P A R KI N G 21045946.17MHS>>>>>>>>GG OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU >>950946947948949951952950949951947948949 950 949 951 952 953 9 4 5 950 946947948949 950 95 0 945 946 947 950 949950948949945944946947 940941942943945943944 946 940941942 9409459459419429439439449449469469479459469479489 4 5 950 941941 942 9 4 3 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 951952952952950949951950948949950950949949951950950950 949 951 952 952 952 945950944946947948949951 952 952 953 953954 952 953 950 951 952950 950951951952 9529539539529 51 9 5 2 9 5 3 9 5 4955951952953954956 950 9 4 9 951 952 945943944 946 947 9459469479439449509 5 1 9 5 2 9 5 3 950951945 950 946 947 948 949 940 945 939941942943 944 946 947 948934940945944946947950949951952950 950 951 951 952 9 5 1 952950951 950 94 8 9 4 9 943 940 952 953 953 954 954 951 952 953 953 9509499 5 1952 953945 950 944 946 947 948 949 951950 95 0 950 950 94 9 949 9 5 1 951 951951 9 5 2 9 5 3 9509499499499519519 5 2 953945950944946947948949950950950950949950949951947945941942943944946947950 951 950 951 950 951 950 951 95 0 94 8 9 4 9 951 952 953950948949951945946947942950950950949951950950949949951950949951952953945946947948949949945946936 943 945 946 950 947 948 949 951 952 953 9459469479489519 5 295095095 5 95195195295 2 95 3 95 4 95 6 95 7 950 949 951 952950 948949 947948 950 947 948949951952 951952952947 947 945950 942943944946947948949 940938939941 937 935936 934941941940937938939941941945 94 3 94 4 946 94 7 945946947948949949948 949 940938939931936 939940 9359489 3 9 9 4 4 9 3 7 9 4 4 942943944948 9 4 0 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 9 4 1 9 4 2 9 4 5 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 948947952 953 951952 953 951 950 950941942943944950948949948950 950 951 952 950 949 950 950 948 949 951952 947 95195295095195295295395495295395495095195295095094794894995194493 9 9 5 0 9 4 9 950 949951945950943944946947948949951952953954EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF 948.75 SPILLWAY EOF EOFEOF EOFEO F E O FEOF EOF EOF EOF EOF951.63SPIL L W A Y EOF EOF948.50EOF EOFEOFEOFEOFEOF EOFEO F EOF EOF EOF EOF EOFEOF EOF EO F SPILLWAYE O F949.80949.82 944.90950.39950.17949.75951.25946.50 946.00 947.43 946 . 0 0946.73947.39952.24 951.68951.93 951.53 950.00 950.41 950.41950.50 950.50948.38948.26949.40 948.10 949.58949.96949.97950.00950.009 5 0 . 5 0 95 0 . 2 3 946. 0 0 9 4 9 . 2 6 951.309 5 1 . 4 0 9 5 1 . 2 6951.45950.66 950.18950.31 941.009 4 1 . 5 0 EO F EOFEOF EOF 949.13 E O F 9 4 5 . 3 9EOF944.24EOFE O FEOFEOFEOF947.25947.24947.25 950.31 EOF 948.99EO F 9 4 9 . 2 5 945 943 944 946 947 948 94 9950951952953 -5.00%940 938 939 941 ASSUMED TUNNEL BOTTOM 15 FT BELOW PROPOSED STREET ELEVATION 951952953948949 EOF 950.04 EOF 949.65EOF950.00955951952953954EOF948.93EOF948.93EOF 950.03 SPILLWAY EOFEOFEOF 952.23EOF 952.33EOF 948.50 EOF 950.03 EOF 950.26 WETLAND IMPACT AREA 38,957 SF WETLAND IMPACT AREA 3,686 SF WETLAND IMPACT AREA 1,171 SF WETLAND IMPACT AREA 10,014SFSPILLWAY944.00SPILLWAY 944.00SPILLWAY943.50SPILLWAY 938.50939.49WETLAND SADDLE949.89EOF950.86EOF951.35EOF952.0 8EOF952.00 EOF9459 4 6 9429439449 4 5 9 4 2 9 4 3 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 94 9 9 5 0 95 1 9 5 2 9 4 3 950 951 952 953 952953950 949 951952 953953954 950 946947948949951952953 950951952953 950951952953954945943944946947951 952944.10935.60942.60941.50942.50942.50930.50951952FFE=950.25FFE=950.25FFE=950.75FFE=950.75FFE=950FFE=950FFE=953.14FFE=952.87FFE=952.50FFE=952.20FFE=952.16FFE=952.37FFE=953.07FFE=953.92FFE=954.75FFE=955.16FFE=954.89FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00LFE=948.00FFE=952.00LFE=948.00FFE=953.00LFE=949.00FFE=953.30LFE=949.30952NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:41:07 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C4-GRAD.DWG:C4.01 GRADING PLAN© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 JMW EJC CMA Emily Jean Castaias 10/20/2023 60741 SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SOIL BORING999.9 ST # DRAINTILE 902.50 902.50 SPOT ELEVATIONS RIPRAP EOF 902.50 OVERFLOW ELEV. CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE 902 CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER BUILDING LINE 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:41:07 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C4-GRAD.DWG:C4.01 GRADING PLANGRADING PLAN C4.01 WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS: 53,828 SF EXISTING POND HWL: 947.47 NWL: 947.00 P O N D 1 2 N HW L : 9 4 6 . 8 0 NW L : 9 4 3 . 5 0 POND 13N HWL:948.52 NWL:946.50 EXISTING CEMETERY SWALE O S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNTE R S RI D G E HUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROADPOND 5NHWL:940.50NWL:938.50FILTRATION 6FHWL: 940.04POND 11N HWL:948.91 NWL:945.60 FILTRATION 11F HWL:948.91 FILTRATION 12F2HWL:946.59F I L T R A T I O N 1 2 F 1 HW L : 9 4 6 . 7 1COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAYTOT LOT POND 2NHWL:946.31NWL:944.00POND 4NHWL:948.67NWL:944.00SENIOR HOUSING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F.PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 28,800 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 31,300 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. FFE=952.00 PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 8 UNITS FFE=948.254 UNITSFFE=951.0051 UNITS 5.52 ACRES 3.40 ACRES 5.65 ACRES 4.25 ACRES 122 UNITS IL/AL FFE=953 / GFE=942 184 UNITS FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FFE=952.00 1.2 ACRES 8 UNITS FFE=949.75 8 UNITSFFE=949.50 / LFE=941.508 UNITS FFE=948.50 28 MC Units MC GARDEN ACTIVE SENIOR 110 UNITS FFE=953 GFE=942 12345678910111213141516171819202223242526219 UNI T S FFE=9 5 2. 2 5 6 UNITSFFE=952.50LFE=944.50FFE=954 GFE=943 FILTRATION 3FHWL: 945.20REQUIRED AVG 35'BUFFER: 51751 SFEXISTING WETLAND HWL: 938.56 NWL: 937.88 148 UNITS 40,355 S.F. FFE=954.00 PROVIDED BUFFER:57281 SFPROPOSED MULTIFAMILY "A" PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROO F O F P A R KI N GBLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT ABLOCK 1LOT1OUTLOT CPARCEL 3PARCEL 2PARCEL 1PARCEL 4WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022EXISTING BUILDINGS950 9 5 0955955 9 4 7948949949949949 9 4 9 9 5 19519 5 2952953953954954 945 95095095094 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 95 1 951 9 5 1 95 0 9 4 6 94 7 9 4 8 94 9 95 1 95 2 945 950 946 947 948 949 951 952 9529529 5 0 9 5 5 9 4 6 94 7 94 8 9 4 9 9 5 1 9 5 2953954945950941942943944946947948949 955953953954954956957955953953 954956957955954945 950 942 943 944 9 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 949 951 95 2 9 4 0 9459 3 9 9419429439449469479489469 4 7 948 945 946 947 948 945 94 5 94 4 944946 946 947 94 6 9479 4 5 9509 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 948949951 952 950 951 951 952 952 953 95 3 945950950 950 946 947948949951 951951 952 952 953 953954954 945945945942943944946946946947947947948948949949949 949 940936937938939941945950955 943 944 946 947 948 949951952953954956 957 9 5 8 9 5 0 9469479489499 5 1 9 5 2 9 5 3 954945945950944944946946947947948948949943944940940 938939 945 950 946 947 948 949 951 952 953 955953954955951951951951 952 953953 953 954954954 956950955 946947948949951 951 951952 952 952 952953953 953954 950 951 9 5 2 952 953 950 949935940945 93293393493693793893994194294394494694794894595095094 3 944946947948949951951945 950 942 943 944 946 947 948 949 945 950941942 943 944 94 6 947 948 949 94 5 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 948 945942943944946947948 949949 9499259309359409 4 5 9269279289299319329339349369379389399419429439449469479489489489519519529529529529 5 3 9539539549 5 4 954950955960946947948949951952953954956957958959961 IE:947.51RE:948.68IE:945.73IE:946.6012" CMPRE:948.51IE:945.39NEIE:945.29WIE:945.20SE*1 2 " R C P12" RCP12" RCPRE:948.59IE:945.29NW*IE:945.70SE*(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)950946947948949951952950949951947948949 950 949 951 952 953 9 4 5 950 946947948949 950 95 0 945 946 947 950 949950948949945944946947 940941942943945943944 946 940941942 9409459459419429439439449449469469479459469479489 4 5 950 941941 942 9 4 3 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 951952952952950949951950948949950950949949951950950950 949 951 952 952 952 945950944946947948949951 952 952 953 953954 952 953 950 951 952950 950951951952 9529539539529 51 9 5 2 9 5 3 9 5 4955951952953954956 950 9 4 9 951 952 945943944 946 947 9459469479439449509 5 1 9 5 2 9 5 3 950951945 950 946 947 948 949 940 945 939941942943 944 946 947 948934940945944946947950949951952950 950 951 951 952 9 5 1 952950951 950 94 8 9 4 9 943 940 952 953 953 954 954 951 952 953 953 9509499 5 1952 953945 950 944 946 947 948 949 951950 95 0 950 950 94 9 949 9 5 1 951 951951 9 5 2 9 5 3 9509499499499519519 5 2 953945950944946947948949950950950950949950949951947945941942943944946947950 951 950 951 950 951 950 951 95 0 94 8 9 4 9 951 952 953950948949951945946947942950950950949951950950949949951950949951952953945946947948949949945946936 943 945 946 950 947 948 949 951 952 953 9459469479489519 5 295095095 5 95195195295 2 95 3 95 4 95 6 95 7 950 949 951 952950 948949 947948 950 947 948949951952 951952952947 947 945950 942943944946947948949 940938939941 937 935936 934941941940937938939941941945 94 3 94 4 946 94 7 945946947948949949948 949 940938939931936 939940 9359489 3 9 9 4 4 9 3 7 9 4 4 942943944948 9 4 0 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 9 4 1 9 4 2 9 4 5 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 948947952 953 951952 953 951 950 950941942943944950948949948950 950 951 952 950 949 950 950 948 949 951952 947 95195295095195295295395495295395495095195295095094794894995194493 9 9 5 0 9 4 9 950 949951945950943944946947948949951952953954EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF 948.75 SPILLWAY EOF EOFEOF EOFEO F E O FEOF EOF EOF EOF EOF951.63SPIL L W A Y EOF EOF948.50EOF EOFEOFEOFEOFEOF EOFEO F EOF EOF EOF EOF EOFEOF EOF EO F SPILLWAYE O F EO F EOFEOF EOF E O FEOF EOFE O FEOFEOFEOF EOF EO F 945 943 944 946 947 948 94 9950951952953 -5.00%940 938 939 941 951952953948949 EOFEOFEOF 955951952953954EOFEOFEOF SPILLWAY EOFEOFEOFEOF EOF 948.50 EOF EOFSPILLWAY944.00SPILLWAY 944.00SPILLWAY943.50SPILLWAY 938.50WETLAND SADDLEEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF9459 4 6 9429439449 4 5 9 4 2 9 4 3 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 94 9 9 5 0 95 1 9 5 2 9 4 3 950 951 952 953 952953950 949 951952 953953954 950 946947948949951952953 950951952953 950951952953954945943944946947951 952 951952FFE=950.25FFE=950.25FFE=950.75FFE=950.75FFE=950FFE=950FFE=953.14FFE=952.87FFE=952.50FFE=952.20FFE=952.16FFE=952.37FFE=953.07FFE=953.92FFE=954.75FFE=955.16FFE=954.89FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00LFE=948.00FFE=952.00LFE=948.00FFE=953.00LFE=949.00FFE=953.30LFE=949.3095220125954.74B1INV=949.85INV=949.4720253946.52CO 10 HDPE20489958.12CO20490958.01COINV=950.12INV=949.5820645951.29E20659951.90CO SEPTIC20660952.41CO SEPTICINV=947.6620697949.14GE E PTINV=946.86INV=947.8321044946.58CO21045946.17MHS21046945.62EB OUTLET POST FOR SEPTIC21047945.96CO21153938.45CO HDPE 1021154937.39CO INVINV=936.49INV=937.68INV=930.60INV=930.24RIM=937.32INV=INV=941.48INV=946.43INV=948.74INV=948.97INV=945.11INV=945.17>>>>>>>>>>>> GGUEUEUE >> IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2IP1IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 IP1 IP3 TSB TSB TSB TSB IP1IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 1:35:42 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C5-EROS.DWG:C5.01 PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 JMW EJC CMA Emily Jean Castaias 10/20/2023 60741 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET 12850 SILT DIKE LINEAR FEET 0 BIO-ROLL LINEAR FEET 120 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 2 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-1)UNIT 67 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-2)UNIT 46 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-3)UNIT 25 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. * REFER TO SHEET C5.03 & C5.04 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES BIO-ROLL SILT FENCE SILT DIKE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH CHECK DAM LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICEIP# TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINSB TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS OUTLINED IN THE SWPP) TSM TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREATS TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINTILE 902 CONTOUR OVERFLOW ELEV.EOF 902.5 SOIL BORING999.9 ST # RIPRAP CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 1:35:42 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C5-EROS.DWG:C5.01 PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL PLANPHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C5.01 20042952.65UP OU B20043953.10UP OU20083951.13UP OU20178951.21PEDINV=949.85INV=949.4720357953.30UP OU2 B20364952.52UP OU1 B20378953.27PED20379952.82PED20386961.39GM20413953.93WELL20430948.86UP OU OU1 E20525949.88PED1949.66LMX STANTEC CONTROL PIPE 50120556950.08UP OUINV=950.12INV=949.5820588948.58ANC20589949.00UP OH EU B20664949.95PED20665949.44PED20680948.37UP OH EU1 EINV=947.66INV=946.8620717950.09PED20720949.49PED20769948.63PED20770948.54EP20806945.66ANC20807944.96UP OU1 B20808944.99PED20848937.42UP OU120971945.37ANC20972945.44UP OU E20973 945.92 PED 21045946.17MHS21191933.65LMCI LS 46563RIM=937.32INV=INV=941.48INV=945.11INV=945.17>>>>>>>>GG OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU UE UE UEUE UE >>OUCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCND CNDCNDCND CND CND CND CND CND CND CND CND CND CND CND UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UEUE UE UE UE CNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCND GGGGGGG GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGGGGF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OF/OF/O F/O F/O EXISTING POND HWL: 947.47 NWL: 947.00 P O N D 1 2 N HW L : 9 4 6 . 8 0 NW L : 9 4 3 . 5 0 POND 13N HWL:948.52 NWL:946.50 EXISTING CEMETERY SWALE O S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNT E R S RI D G E HUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROADPOND 5NHWL:940.50NWL:938.50FILTRATION6FHWL:940.04POND 11N HWL:948.91 NWL:945.60 FILTRATION 11F HWL:948.91 FILTRATION12F2HWL:946.59F I L T R A T I O N 1 2 F 1 HW L : 9 4 6 . 7 1COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAYTOT LOT POND 2NHWL:946.31NWL:944.00POND 4NHWL:948.67NWL:944.00SENIOR HOUSING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F.PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 28,800 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 31,300 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. FFE=952.00 PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 8 UNITS FFE=948.254 UNITSFFE=951.0051 UNITS 5.52 ACRES 3.40 ACRES 5.65 ACRES 4.25 ACRES 122 UNITS IL/AL FFE=953 / GFE=942 184 UNITS FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FFE=952.00 1.2 ACRES 8 UNITS FFE=949.75 8 UNITSFFE=949.50 / LFE=941.508 UNITS FFE=948.50 28 MC Units MC GARDEN ACTIVE SENIOR 110 UNITS FFE=953 GFE=942 12345678910111213141516171819202223242526219 UNI T S FFE=9 5 2. 2 5 6 UNITSFFE=952.50LFE=944.50FFE=954 GFE=943 FILTRATION3F HWL:945.20REQUIRED AVG 35'BUFFER: 51751 SFEXISTING WETLAND HWL: 938.56 NWL: 937.88 148 UNITS 40,355 S.F. FFE=954.00 PROVIDED BUFFER:57281 SFPROPOSED MULTIFAMILY "A" PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROO F O F P A R KI N GWETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022EXISTING BUILDINGSIE:947.51RE:948.68IE:945.73IE:946.6012" CMPRE:948.51IE:945.39NEIE:945.29WIE:945.20SE*1 2 " R C P12" RCP12" RCPRE:948.59IE:945.29NW*IE:945.70SE*12" D R A I N T I L E A P P R O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N (PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS 20" DIPS HDPE DR-11 BY OTHERS 2 0 " D I P S H D P E D R - 1 1 B Y O T H E R S20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS20"x20" TEE BY OTHERS 20" DIPS HDPE DR-11 BY OTHERS 20"x8" CROSS BY OTHERS HYD. 6" GV. 8"x6" TEE BY OTHERS HYD. 6" GV. 8"x6" TEE BY OTHERS 20"x8" TEE BY OTHERS HYD. 6" GV. BY OTHERS WATERMAIN TO WATER TOWER BY OTHERS 20"x8" TEE BY OTHERS 20"x8" TEE BY OTHERS 20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS 20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS16" WM OTHERS16" WM OTHERS 20"x8" TEE BY OTHERS SMH 1 BY OTHERS (48'') RE=932.72 IE=905.46 W SMH 3 BY OTHERS (60'') RE=946.90 IE=906.02 S IE=906.01 N SMH 4 BY OTHERS (60'') RE=950.50 IE=906.25 W IE=906.20 N SMH5 BY OTHERS (60'') RE=949.22 IE=927.00 N IE=906.55 W IE=927.00 S IE=906.45 E SMH 1 RE=950.69 IE=906.85 W IE=906.75 E SMH 2 RE=952.24 IE=907.10 W IE=936.45 S IE=907.00 E SMH 3 RE=950.23 IE=907.32 W IE=907.22 E SMH 4 RE=949.25 IE=907.53 W IE=936.75 S IE=907.43 E SMH 2 BY OTHERS (60'') RE=938.87 IE=905.81 S IE=905.76 E SMH 16 RE=948.15 IE=937.81 N IE=937.71 W SMH 15 RE=950.55 IE=936.97 E IE=936.97 N IE=936.87 SW SMH 8 RE=951.76 IE=936.60 NE IE=936.60 NW IE=936.50 SE SMH 14 RE=946.94 IE=939.56 E IE=939.46 SSMH 13 RE=947.34 IE=939.20 N IE=939.20 W IE=939.10 S SMH 12 RE=947.76 IE=938.57 N IE=938.57 E IE=938.47 W SMH 11 RE=948.78 IE=938.19 E IE=938.19 S IE=938.09 W SMH 10 RE=949.26 IE=937.89 E IE=937.79 SW SMH 6 RE=949.44 IE=935.09 NW IE=935.09 NE IE=934.99 S SMH 7 RE=950.68 IE=935.89 NW IE=935.89 NE IE=935.79 SE SMH 5 RE=949.10 IE=934.80 N IE=934.70 S SMH 24 RE=951.54 IE=934.04 S IE=933.94 E SMH 26 RE=949.79 IE=943.47 E IE=943.47 W IE=943.37 N SMH 25 RE=950.18 IE=942.43 S IE=942.33 NW SMH 29 RE=950.28 IE=943.60 S IE=943.60 N IE=943.60 E IE=943.50 W SMH 28 RE=950.42 IE=943.16 E IE=943.06 N SMH 27 RE=951.18 IE=942.27 S IE=942.17 NW SMH 20 RE=951.49 IE=930.72 SW IE=937.97 SE IE=930.62 NW IE=930.62 NE SMH 17 RE=950.19 IE=928.70 S IE=928.70 W IE=928.64 E IE=928.60 N SMH 18 RE=952.00 IE=929.90 S IE=929.80 N SMH 19 RE=951.53 IE=930.31 SW IE=930.21 N SMH 21 RE=952.63 IE=932.22 SW IE=932.12 NE SMH 23 RE=952.79 IE=933.28 W IE=933.18 E STUB 4 IE=937.15 S STUB 5 IE=938.00 S STUB 6 IE=939.75 W STUB 7 IE=944.68 E STUB 8 IE=942.01 W STUB 9 IE=943.02 N STUB 18 IE=941.50 SW STUB 10 IE=937.02 N STUB 1 IE=907.65 E STUB 11 IE=936.99 E STUB 12 IE=936.75 W STUB 13 IE=944.00 S STUB 14 IE=944.00 N STUB 15 IE=944.00 W STUB 16 IE=944.00 E SMH 30 RE=949.90 IE=937.22 S IE=937.11 N SMH 31 RE=948.49 IE=937.57 N STUB 2 IE=937.18 SE HYD. 6" GV 8"x6" TEE HYD. 6" GV 8"x6" TEE HYD. 6" GV 20"x6" TEE 20" PVC-C900 PLUG HYD. 6" GV 8" TO 6" RED.20"x8" TEE 8" GV 8"x8" TEE 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 8" PVC-C900 PLUG 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 8" PVC-C900 PLUG HYD. 6" GV 8"x6" TEE HYD. 6" GV 8"x6" TEE 8" PVC-C900 PLUG 8"x8" TEE 8" PVC-C900 PLUG 8" PVC-C900 PLUG 8"x6" TEE HYD. 6" GV. 8"x8" TEE 8" PVC-C900 PLUG 8"x8" TEE 8" PVC-C900 PLUG 8" PVC-C900 8" GV. HYD. 6" GV. 8"x6" TEE HYD. 6" GV 8"x6" TEE 8" PVC-C900 PLUG 8" PVC-C900 8" PVC-C900 8" PVC-C900 8" PVC-C900 8" PVC-C900 8" PVC-C900 8" PVC-C900 8" PVC-C900 PLUG HYD. 6" GV 8"x6" TEE 8"x8" TEE 8" GV. 8"x8" TEE 8" GV. 8"x8" TEE 8" GV.8" PVC C-9008" PVC C-9008" PVC C-9008" PV C C-900 8" PVC C-900 8" PVCC-9008" PVC C-900 8" PVC C-9008" PVC C - 9 0 0 8" PVC C-9008" PVC C-900 8" PVCC-9008" PVC C-9008" PVCC-9008" PVC C-900 8" PVC C-9008" PVC C-900 8" PVCC-9008" PVC C-900 8" PVC C-9008" PVC C-9008" PVC C-900 20" PVC C-9008" PVC C-900149 LF - 30"PVC SDR 26 @ 0.20%280 LF - 30" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.07% 253 LF - 30" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.07%289 LF - 30"PVC SDR 26 @ 0.07%293 LF - 30" PVC C900 @ 0.07% 212 LF - 30" PVC C900 @ 0.07% 171 LF - 30" PVC C900 @ 0.07% 143 LF - 30" PVC C900 @ 0.08% 169 LF - 30" PVC C900 @ 0.07% 185 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 68 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 0.40% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 0.40% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 0.40% 66 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 133 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 71 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 50 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 67 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 4.05% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 7.80% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 15.50% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 14.30% 175 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 153 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 81 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 9.50% 49 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 120 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.48% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 10.20% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 2.33% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 0.40% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 1.30% 235 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 107 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 2.00% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 0.40% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 0.95% 86 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 197 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40% 210 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 2.00% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 4.40% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 7.00% 400 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 276 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 77 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 77 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 350 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 103 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 112 LF - 10" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 165 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 83 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.42%72 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.51% 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 0.40% 40 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 @ 2.00% STUB 19 IE=931.42 SE STUB 17 IE=940.50 N 8" PVC-C900 PLUG SMH 22 RE=952.28 IE=932.73 W IE=940.19 SE IE=932.63 NE STUB 20 IE=944.05 W 8" SAN. SERVICE @ 0.40% EXTEND WATERMAIN 20" PVC C-900 20" PVC C-90020" REDUCER HYD. 6" GV SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:45 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C6-UTIL.DWG:C6.01 UTILITY PLAN© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 JMW EJC CMA Emily Jean Castaias 10/20/2023 60741 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 224.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:45 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C6-UTIL.DWG:C6.01 UTILITY PLANUTILITY PLAN C6.01 20042952.65UP OU B20043953.10UP OU20083951.13UP OU20178951.21PEDINV=949.85INV=949.4720357953.30UP OU2 B20364952.52UP OU1 B20378953.27PED20379952.82PED20386961.39GM20413953.93WELL20430948.86UP OU OU1 E20525949.88PED1949.66LMX STANTEC CONTROL PIPE 50120556950.08UP OUINV=950.12INV=949.5820588948.58ANC20589949.00UP OH EU B20664949.95PED20665949.44PED20680948.37UP OH EU1 EINV=947.66INV=946.8620717950.09PED20720949.49PED20769948.63PED20770948.54EP20806945.66ANC20807944.96UP OU1 B20808944.99PED20848937.42UP OU120971945.37ANC20972945.44UP OU E20973 945.92 PED 21045946.17MHS21191933.65LMCI LS 46563RIM=937.32INV=INV=941.48INV=945.11INV=945.17>>>>>>>>GG OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU UE UE UEUE UE >>OUCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCND CNDCNDCND CND CND CND CND CND CND CND CND CND CND CND UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UEUE UE UE UE CNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCNDCND GGGGGGG GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGGGGF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OF/OF/O F/O F/O EXISTING POND HWL: 947.47 NWL: 947.00 P O N D 1 2 N HW L : 9 4 6 . 8 0 NW L : 9 4 3 . 5 0 POND 13N HWL:948.52 NWL:946.50 EXISTING CEMETERY SWALE O S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNT E R S RI D G E HUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROADPOND 5NHWL:940.50NWL:938.50FILTRATION6FHWL:940.04POND 11N HWL:948.91 NWL:945.60 FILTRATION 11F HWL:948.91 FILTRATION12F2HWL:946.59F I L T R A T I O N 1 2 F 1 HW L : 9 4 6 . 7 1COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAYTOT LOT POND 2NHWL:946.31NWL:944.00POND 4NHWL:948.67NWL:944.00SENIOR HOUSING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F.PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 28,800 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 31,300 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. FFE=952.00 PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 8 UNITS FFE=948.254 UNITSFFE=951.0051 UNITS 5.52 ACRES 3.40 ACRES 5.65 ACRES 4.25 ACRES 122 UNITS IL/AL FFE=953 / GFE=942 184 UNITS FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FFE=952.00 1.2 ACRES 8 UNITS FFE=949.75 8 UNITSFFE=949.50 / LFE=941.508 UNITS FFE=948.50 28 MC Units MC GARDEN ACTIVE SENIOR 110 UNITS FFE=953 GFE=942 12345678910111213141516171819202223242526219 UNI T S FFE=9 5 2. 2 5 6 UNITSFFE=952.50LFE=944.50FFE=954 GFE=943 FILTRATION3F HWL:945.20REQUIRED AVG 35'BUFFER: 51751 SFEXISTING WETLAND HWL: 938.56 NWL: 937.88 148 UNITS 40,355 S.F. FFE=954.00 PROVIDED BUFFER:57281 SFPROPOSED MULTIFAMILY "A" PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROO F O F P A R KI N GWETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022EXISTING BUILDINGSIE:947.51RE:948.68IE:945.73IE:946.6012" CMPRE:948.51IE:945.39NEIE:945.29WIE:945.20SE*1 2 " R C P12" RCP12" RCPRE:948.59IE:945.29NW*IE:945.70SE*(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS 20" DIPS HDPE DR-11 BY OTHERS 2 0 " D I P S H D P E D R - 1 1 B Y O T H E R S20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS20"x20" TEE BY OTHERS 20" DIPS HDPE DR-11 BY OTHERS 20"x8" CROSS BY OTHERS HYD. 6" GV. 8"x6" TEE BY OTHERS HYD. 6" GV. 8"x6" TEE BY OTHERS 20"x8" TEE BY OTHERS HYD. 6" GV. BY OTHERS WATERMAIN TO WATER TOWER BY OTHERS 20"x8" TEE BY OTHERS 20"x8" TEE BY OTHERS 20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS 20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS16" WM OTHERS16" WM OTHERS 20"x8" TEE BY OTHERS YD 214 RE=949.00 IE=945.97 S ROOF DRAIN IE=947.40 E ROOF DRAIN IE=947.02 S CBMH 703 RE=949.89 IE=945.73 E CBMH 702 RE=949.93 IE=945.33 E CB 215 RE=949.78 IE=946.42 S ROOF DRAIN IE=946.00 E RD 722 RE=952.55 IE=944.45 E YD 504 RE=948.57 IE=945.82 N ROOF DRAIN IE=944.92 N STMH 131 RE=947.83 IE=941.17 N CB 704 RE=949.45 IE=946.37 E YD 205A RE=948.84 IE=946.31 E CBMH 802 RE=949.50 IE=945.06 W IE=944.84 S CB 802A RE=949.65 CBMH 203 RE=949.03 IE=944.83 N YD 205 RE=948.62 IE=945.41 N YD 213A RE=949.00 IE=945.97 N YD 213 RE=949.00 IE=945.26 W CB 322 RE=949.20 IE=946.60 SW CBMH 503 RE=949.20 IE=945.11 N CB 105 RE=950.64 IE=947.25 W STMH 501 RE=951.06 IE=944.43 N W/ 4' SUMP STMH 701 RE=951.67 IE=944.47 E W/ 4' SUMP CBMH 801 RE=948.25 IE=944.11 S W/ 4' SUMP CB 202A RE=948.25 IE=944.91 E STMH 305 RE=952.09 IE=936.22 N CBMH 202 RE=948.00 IE=944.01 E CBMH 201 RE=948.00 IE=943.63 N W/ 4' SUMP CBMH 211 RE=948.00 IE=943.64 W W/ 4' SUMP CB 603 RE=948.47 IE=944.43 W CB 602 RE=948.47 IE=944.25 W FES 500 IE=944.00 S YD 113 RE=949.01 IE=947.40 W YD 112 RE=948.50 IE=946.75 W YD 111 RE=948.50 IE=945.70 W W/ 4' SUMP YD 206 RE=948.20 IE=946.59 W CBMH 512 RE=951.50 IE=946.45 N CBMH 212 RE=949.32 IE=944.55 W CBMH 511 RE=951.25 IE=945.67 N FES 241 IE=946.50 N CBMH 510 RE=951.00 IE=944.90 W CB 510B RE=951.13 IE=947.13 S STMH 601 RE=949.11 IE=944.13 SW W/ 4' SUMP CBMH 901 RE=946.50 IE=938.90 NE W/ 4' SUMP CBMH 902 RE=946.43 IE=941.93 NE CBMH 803 RE=949.00 IE=945.02 SW CB 804 RE=948.73 IE=945.16 S CB 904 RE=947.16 CBMH 903 RE=947.15 IE=942.88 E IE=942.88 N CB 721 RE=949.25 IE=944.15 E W/ 4' SUMP STMH 102 RE=949.96 IE=946.14 S CB 613 RE=948.56 IE=944.75 W CB 611 RE=948.59 IE=944.42 S CB 610 RE=948.59 IE=944.28 S CB 612 RE=948.53 IE=944.61 SW CB 211A RE=948.00 IE=944.09 S FES 832 IE=944.00 S FES 842 IE=944.00 S OCS 132 RE=947.48 IE=941.43 NW FES 240 IE=946.50 W FES 110 RE=946.79 FES 731 IE=944.00 SW FES 730 IE=942.88 NE FES 600 IE=944.00 NE FES 141 IE=945.60 N FES 221 IE=943.50 N FES 231 IE=943.50 N FES 700 IE=944.00 W FES 720 IE=944.00 W FES 200 IE=943.50 S FES 143 IE=945.60 N FES 142 IE=944.60 S STMH 104 RE=950.25 IE=946.70 S OCS 931 RE=940.71 IE=933.92 E FES 830 IE=939.00 N FES 900 IE=938.50 SW FES 921 IE=938.50 W STMH 302 RE=949.92 IE=932.35 E FES 220 IE=943.00 S FES 230 IE=943.00 S FES 920 IE=938.25 E FES 341 IE=943.50 NE FES 340 IE=942.50 SW FES 331 IE=943.50 NE FES 330 IE=942.50 SW FES 930 IE=933.04 W FES 840 IE=939.00 N FES 800 IE=944.00 N FES 520 IE=944.00 S STMH 320 IE=945.75 NW IE=945.75 SW FES 130 IE=940.00 SFES 133 IE=944.10 NW FES 140 IE=944.60 S FES 308 IE=941.00 N 131 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 146 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 10 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.00% 209 LF - 15" HDPE @ 0.25% 110 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 117 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.40% 83 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.12% 159 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.55% 22 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.43% 190 L F - 2 4 " HDPE @ 0 . 4 3 % 26 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.49% 87 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.44% 126 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.48% 60 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.50% 52 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% 90 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 27 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.50% 141 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 141 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 184 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.50% 91 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 141 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 26 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% 34 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.96% 34 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.97% 37 LF - 24" HDPE @ 1.34% 37 LF - 24" HDPE @ 1.36% 98 LF - 18" HDPE @ 1.02% 97 LF - 18" HDPE @ 1.03% 154 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 154 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 142 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 82 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.50% 191 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% 68 LF - 36" HDPE @ 0.63% 83 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.57% 140 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.64% 46 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.00% 59 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 31 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 81 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 172 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.50% 90 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.52% 28 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 132 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.47% 2 2 3 L F - 2 4 "HDP E @ 0 . 5 0% 104 LF - 15" HDPE @ 0.25% 26 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% 145 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 23 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.50% 28 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 35 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 36 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 23 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 29 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50%26 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.50% 27 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 39 LF - 15" HDPE @ 0.50% 164 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 190 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 81 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.50% 26 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.50% 28 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.89% 177 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% 11 LF - 15" HDPE @ 0.00% 11 LF - 15" HDPE @ 0.00% 278 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.50% 366 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.50% 17 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.00% FES 100 RE=947.84 18 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.40% STMH 101 RE=951.08 IE=945.67 W W/ 4' SUMP 29 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.40% STMH 103 RE=950.09 IE=946.26 SW 112 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.40% 52 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50% CBMH 104A RE=949.56 IE=946.96 SE 36 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% CB 104B RE=949.74 IE=947.14 S ROOF DRAIN IE=948.00 W 134 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 1.16% ROOF DRAIN IE=947.00 W 66 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00% 80 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 1.58% ROOF DRAIN IE=947.00 N CBMH 312 RE=947.44 IE=945.50 S 65 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.51% OCS 307 RE=946.78 IE=938.00 W 65 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.50% STMH 306 RE=947.23 IE=937.68 N 290 LF - 36" HDPE @ 0.50% STMH 311 RE=951.07 IE=945.17 N STMH 304 RE=951.87 IE=934.83 N 283 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.50%STMH 303 RE=950.25 IE=933.42 E 213 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.50% FES 210 IE=943.50 E CB 604 RE=949.09 IE=944.60 SW 35 LF - 15" HDPE @ 0.50% CB 605 RE=949.08 IE=944.78 S 36 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 24 LF - 12" HDPE @ -0.51% 68 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% YD 910 RE=946.50 IE=942.66 E 82 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% YD 911 RE=946.62 IE=943.07 N 87 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% YD 912 RE=946.58 IE=943.50 N OCS 841 RE=946.00 IE=939.17 S OCS 831 RE=946.00 IE=939.17 S YD 404 RE=950.17 IE=947.24 SE 58 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% YD 403 RE=950.72 IE=947.53 E 76 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% YD 402 RE=950.45 IE=947.91 NE 74 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% YD 401 RE=950.54 IE=948.28 NE 105 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% CBMH 400 IE=946.71 NW IE=946.71 SE CONNECT EXISTING DRAINTILE TO MANHOLE. 254 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.19%305 LF - 12"HDPE @ 0.19%STMH 250 IE=942.00 S 12 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.00% FES 932 IE=937.00 NE FES 923 IE=938.50 W 28 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.89% FES 922 RE=939.94 STMH 502 RE=951.01 IE=944.70 N 28 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.50% CB 502A RE=949.62 IE=947.02 NW 36 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.50% CB 502B RE=950.16 IE=947.56 W CBMH 204 RE=949.15 IE=945.31 N 113 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.43% FES 821 IE=944.00 S 28 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.78% FES 820 IE=943.50 N FES 811 IE=944.00 S 28 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.78% FES 810 IE=943.50 N FES 229 IE=946.50 NW 286 LF - 12"HDPE @ 0.52 % FES 228 IE=945.00 SE CITY WATER TOWER STUB RE=951.37 IE=947.34 S 68 LF - 6" PVC SCH 40 @ 0.50% FES Structure - (232) IE=945.22 SW 9 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.57% STMH STRUCTURE - (233) RE=951.73 IE=945.17 W 105 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.40% FES Structure - (234) IE=944.75 E CBMH 321 RE=949.00 IE=946.34 SE 59 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% 128 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50 % CB 105A RE=951.61 IE=947.89 N 113 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% CB 106 RE=951.13 IE=947.81 W 109 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% CB 107 RE=951.32 IE=948.36 NW STMH 254 RE=949.21 IE=944.04 E STMH 253 RE=953.56 IE=943.46 N STMH 252 RE=952.26 IE=942.98 N STMH 251 RE=953.29 IE=942.54 N 230 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.19% 285 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.19% CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAINTILE STANDPIPE MANHOLE. TO BE RECONSTRUCTED AND REALIGNED WITH THREE RIVERS PARK TRAIL CONSTRUCTION. FES 260 RE=0.69 62 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% CBMH 261 RE=952.13 IE=944.12 SE W/ 4' SUMP CB 262 RE=951.88 IE=948.00 SE 32 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STB STILLING BASIN SEE DETAIL 15 SHEET C9.0120664949.95PED20665949.44PED20680948.37UP OH EU1 EINV=947.66INV=946.8620717950.09PED20720949.49PED20769948.63PED20770948.54EP20806945.66ANC20807944.96UP OU1 B20808944.99PED20971945.37ANC20972945.44UP OU E20973 945.92 PED INV=941.48OU OU OU OU OU OU UE >>CNDCNDCNDCND CNDCNDCNDCND CND CND CND CND UE UEUE UE UE UE CNDCND GGGGGGGGG GGGGGG GGGGF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OF/OF/O F/O F/O >>SWALE IE:947.51IE:946.6012" CMP 20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS 20" PVC C-900 BY OTHERS 16" WM OTHERSSTMH 302 RE=949.92 IE=932.35 E STMH 301 RE=934.36 IE=930.52 NE FES 300 RE=933.54 366 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.50% 85 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.50% SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:45 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C6-UTIL.DWG:C6.02 STORM SEWER PLAN© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 JMW EJC CMA Emily Jean Castaias 10/20/2023 60741 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 224.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:45 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C6-UTIL.DWG:C6.02 STORM SEWER PLANSTORM SEWER PLAN C6.02 INSET A : 1" = 60' SEE INSET A FOR OFF-SITE STORMSEWER NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/11/2024 3:38:34 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C9-DTLS.DWG:C9.01 DETAILS© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 JMW EJC CMA Emily Jean Castaias 10/20/2023 60741 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/11/2024 3:38:34 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C9-DTLS.DWG:C9.01 DETAILSDETAILS C9.01 STANDARD DUTY PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT NOTES: 1.THE PAVEMENT SECTIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION", AND ALSO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. 2.ALL THICKNESSES, AS SPECIFIED, ARE TO BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM DEPTHS, AFTER COMPACTION. 3.MN/DOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE BITUMINOUS LIFTS AND AGAINST ABUTTING CONCRETE CURB EDGES. XX" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPNW* XX" CLASS X-100% CRUSHED QUARRY ROCK, MN/DOT 3138 XX" CLASS X - 100% CRUSHED ROCK, MN/DOT 3138 XX" CLASS X AGGREGATE BASE, MN/DOT 3138 XX" SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL, MN/DOT 3149.2B (IF REQUIRED BY SOILS ENGINEER) GEOFABRIC, MN/DOT TYPE V, MIRAFI 500X (IF REQUIRED BY SOILS ENGINEER) APPROVED SUBGRADE XX" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPWE* XX" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPNW* XX" CLASS X-100% CRUSHED QUARRY ROCK, MN/DOT 3138 XX" CLASS X - 100% CRUSHED ROCK, MN/DOT 3138 XX" CLASS X AGGREGATE BASE, MN/DOT 3138 XX" SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL, MN/DOT 3149.2B (IF REQUIRED BY SOILS ENGINEER) GEOFABRIC, MN/DOT TYPE V, MIRAFI 500X (IF REQUIRED BY SOILS ENGINEER) APPROVED SUBGRADE XX" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPWE* N.T.S. * REFER TO PAVEMENT DESIGN REQUIREMENT PROVIDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE XX" PCC PAVEMENT, MN/DOT 2301* XX" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, MN/DOT 3138* APPROVED SUBGRADE GENERAL NOTES FOR CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION: 1.ALL THICKNESSES, AS SPECIFIED, ARE TO BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM DEPTHS AFTER COMPACTION. 2.MNDOT SPEC 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE BITUMINOUS LIFTS AND AGAINST ABUTTING CONCRETE CURB EDGES. 3.FOR PREPARATION OF PAVEMENT SUBGRADE, ANY SILT OR CLAY WITHIN THE UPPER 3 FEET OF FINISHED SUBGRADE ELEVATION SHALL BEREMOVED AND REPLACED WITH COMPACTED, CLEAN SANDS. EXISTING SUBGRADE SURFACE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% OF THE MATERIAL'S MAXIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY (ASTM D-698). 4.AFTER PROOF ROLLING WITH A LOADED TANDEM AXLE DUMP TRUCK AND REPAIRING DEEP SUBGRADE DEFICIENCIES, THE ENTIRE SUBGRADE SHOULD BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 12 INCHES, MOISTURE CONDITIONED TO WITHIN 2 PERCENT OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND UNIFORMLY COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY. 5.AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3138 FOR CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE AND SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (ASTM D-698). 6.BITUMINOUS WEAR AND BASE COURSES SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2360 PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS. 7.BITUMINOUS WEAR AND BASE COURSES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AN AVERAGE DENSITY OF 96 PERCENT ACCORDING TO AASHTO T245 (D1556), BUT NOT LESS THAN 92 PERCENT NOR GREATER THAN 100 PERCENT. 8.THE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT MIXTURE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AIR-ENTRAINED CONCRETE FOR PAVEMENT, SECTION 2301 OF THE MNDOT "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION", LATEST EDITION. THE MIXTURE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3900 PSI AT 28 DAYS WITH A 4 INCH MAXIMUM SLUMP FOR HAND PLACED CONCRETE AND A 2" MAXIMUM SLUMP FOR MACHINE PLACED (SLIPFORM) CONCRETE AND 5 TO 7% ENTRAINED AIR. THE MAXIMUM WATER CEMENT RATIO SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.45 FOR CONCRETE EXPOSED TO DEICERS. 01 PAVEMENT SECTIONS FLOWAS NEEDED48" 27"1'-4"4'7"SECTION A-A SECTION B-B B B A A STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE NOTES: 1.WHERE WATER MAY STAND, TOP OF MANHOLE SHALL BE 2 FEET ABOVE GROUND, AND/OR 2 FEET ABOVE THE 100 YEAR STORM WATER ELEVATION. 2.ON MANHOLES 8' DEEP AND GREATER, A ONE FOOT FOUR INCH (1'-4") PRECAST SECTION SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY BELOW THE CONE SECTION. 3.ALL JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONS SHALL HAVE "O" RING RUBBER GASKETS. 4.MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS, 6" FOR 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14' AND REINFORCE WITH 6"X6" 10/10 MESH. MANHOLE CASTING AND COVER, NEENAH R-1642-B, ESS BROS. 309, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH MACHINED BEARING SURFACES AND TWO (2) CONCEALED PICK HOLES. 20" TO SPRING LINE (MAX.) GASKETED FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT CONNECTION (TYP) FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING AND ON OUTSIDE OF RINGS. 2" ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED (MIN. 2, MAX. 4) ADJUST CASTING TO 1/2" BELOW FINISHED BITUMINOUS GRADE. SLOPE 2"/FOOT N.T.S. 02 STANDARD SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE USE T-SECTION MANHOLE WHERE POSSIBLE (MNDOT DESIGN J) WITH OFFSET CONE CONNECTION OR PRECAST SLAB. BASE: PRECAST CONCRETE FLOW STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE SLOPE 2"/FOOT GASKETED, FLEXIBLE, WATERTIGHT CONNECTION AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS UNLESS GROUTED CONNECTION IS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER "O" RING GASKETS BETWEEN EACH JOINT IN MANHOLE SECTIONS NOTES: 1.MANHOLES 8' DEEP OR GREATER, THE PRECAST SECTION IMMEDIATELY BELOW THE CONE SECTION, SHALL BE 1'-4" (16") IN HEIGHT 2.PROVIDE STEPS IN ALL MANHOLES OVER 4.5 FEET IN DEPTH FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING AND ON OUTSIDE OF RINGS 2" ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED (MIN 2, MAX 4) ADJUST CASTING TO 1/2" BELOW FINISHED BITUMINOUS GRADE MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER, NEENAH R-1642-B WITH MACHINED BEARING SURFACES WITH 2 CONCEALED PICK HOLES OR APPROVED EQUAL 27" *AS NEEDEDAS NEEDED1'-4"4'7"N.T.S. 03 STORM SEWER MANHOLE 4' DIA. M.H.-9" IN FROM BACK OF CURB 6' DIA. M.H.-3" BEHIND BACK OF CURB 8' DIA. M.H.-15" BEHIND BACK OF CURB DIMENSION FROM BACK OF CURB TO CENTER OF PIPE. FOR A 24" GRATE OPENING. 24"X 36" SLAB OPENING PROVIDE 27" DIAMETER OPENING IF ROUND CASTING TO BE PROVIDED. SEE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE. NOTE: SEE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR CASTING TYPE. ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE "O" RING RUBBER GASKETS. MANHOLE STEPS NEENAH R1981J OR EQUAL, 16" O.C.- ALUMINUM STEPS APPROVED. DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE OUTSIDE AND THE INSIDE. GASKETED, FLEXIBLE, WATERTIGHT CONNECTION AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS UNLESS GROUTED CONNECTION IS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN RINGS, AND A 6" COLLAR ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE RINGS MINIMUM OF 2, MAXIMUM OF 4 CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB THICKNESS:6" FOR 42" TO 48" DIA. 8" FOR 54" TO 102" DIA. 12" FOR 108" TO 120" DIA. PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS GROUT BOTTOM MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS 6" FOR 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14' AND REINFORCE WITH 6"x6", 10/10 MESH PIPE DI A M E TE RVARIABLE 6"6" VARIABLE 5"1'-4"9" N.T.S. 04 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE CATCH BASIN CASTING ASSEMBLY 3" 36" DIRECTION OF MAJOR FLOW (TYPE DL GRATE) NOTE: USE 4 FT. DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE WHEN DEPTH EXCEEDS 4.5 FT. 24 " 36" SLOPE FLOOR TO PIPE OPENING 2" PER FT. NOTE: 1. EXPANSION MATERIALS TO BE PLACED IN SECOND JOINT, BOTH SIDES OF CATCH BASIN. 2. FOR SURMOUNTABLE CURB, PROVIDE FACE OF CURB TRANSITION APPROX. 10' TO MATCH CASTING. 8" GASKETED, FLEXIBLE, WATERTIGHT CONNECTION AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS UNLESS GROUTED CONNECTION IS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN THE RINGS AND MORTAR THE OUTSIDE. 6" CONCRETE COLLAR PLACED AROUND OUTSIDE OF RINGS. 2" ADJUSTING RINGS, MIN. 2, MAX. 4 6" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE (CRETEX TYPE 477-1 INLET) N.T.S. NEENAH CASTING NO. R-3067 WITH TYPE DR, DL, OR TYPE V GRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL (SEE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR CASTING TYPE) 05 24"x36" CATCH BASIN EXISTING POND HWL: 947.47 NWL: 947.00 P O N D 1 2 N HW L : 9 4 6 . 8 0 NW L : 9 4 3 . 5 0 POND 13N HWL:948.52 NWL:946.50 EXISTING CEMETERY SWALE O S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNTE R S RI D G E HUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROADPOND 5NHWL:940.50NWL:938.50FILTRATION 6FHWL: 940.04POND 11N HWL:948.91 NWL:945.60 FILTRATION 11F HWL:948.91 FILTRATION 12F2HWL:946.59F I L T R A T I O N 1 2 F 1 HW L : 9 4 6 . 7 1COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAYTOT LOT POND 2NHWL:946.31NWL:944.00POND 4NHWL:948.67NWL:944.00SENIOR HOUSING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F.PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 28,800 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 31,300 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. FFE=952.00 PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 8 UNITS FFE=948.254 UNITSFFE=951.0051 UNITS 5.52 ACRES 3.40 ACRES 5.65 ACRES 4.25 ACRES 122 UNITS IL/AL FFE=953 / GFE=942 184 UNITS FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FFE=952.00 1.2 ACRES 8 UNITS FFE=949.75 8 UNITSFFE=949.50 / LFE=941.508 UNITS FFE=948.50 28 MC Units MC GARDEN ACTIVE SENIOR 110 UNITS FFE=953 GFE=942 12345678910111213141516171819202223242526219 UNI T S FFE=9 5 2. 2 5 6 UNITSFFE=952.50LFE=944.50FFE=954 GFE=943 FILTRATION 3FHWL: 945.20REQUIRED AVG 35'BUFFER: 51751 SFEXISTING WETLAND HWL: 938.56 NWL: 937.88 148 UNITS 40,355 S.F. FFE=954.00 PROVIDED BUFFER:57281 SFPROPOSED MULTIFAMILY "A" PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROO F O F P A R KI N G COUNTY ROAD NO. 116COUNTY ROAD NO. 30O S W A L D F A R M R O A D OSWALD FARM RO A DOSWALD FARM ROADHUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS RIDGECOUNTY ROAD NO. 116BLOCK 1BLOCK 110WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022EXISTING BUILDINGSIE:947.51RE:948.68IE:945.73IE:946.6012" CMPRE:948.51IE:945.39NEIE:945.29WIE:945.20SE*1 2 " R C P12" RCP12" RCPRE:948.59IE:945.29NW*IE:945.70SE*(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)ASSUMED TUNNEL BOTTOM 15 FT BELOW PROPOSED STREET ELEVATION FFE=950.25FFE=950.25FFE=950.75FFE=950.75FFE=950FFE=950FFE=953.14FFE=952.87FFE=952.50FFE=952.20FFE=952.16FFE=952.37FFE=953.07FFE=953.92FFE=954.75FFE=955.16FFE=954.89FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00LFE=948.00FFE=952.00LFE=948.00FFE=953.00LFE=949.00FFE=953.30LFE=949.30 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:32 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-L0-TREE.DWG:L0.01 TREE INVENTORY© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 John R. Workman 10/20/2023 59119 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH DETERMINED BY CITY LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED CORCORAN TREE PRESERVATION CODE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:32 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-L0-TREE.DWG:L0.01 TREE INVENTORYTREE INVENTORY L0.01 TREE REMOVALS NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:32 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-L0-TREE.DWG:L0.02 TREE REMOVALS LIST© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 John R. Workman 10/20/2023 59119 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 2 Tree Tag List Tree Number Size Tree Name Status 1601 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1602 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 1603 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1604 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1605 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 1606 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 1607 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1608 9 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve 1609 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1610 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1611 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1612 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1613 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1614 11 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1615 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1616 12 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1617 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1618 8 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve 1619 8 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve 1620 8 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve 1621 9 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve 1622 9 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve 1623 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1624 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1625 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1626 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1627 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1628 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1629 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1630 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1631 11 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1632 9 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)REMOVE 1633 10 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve 1634 8 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)REMOVE 1635 10 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)REMOVE 1636 9 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve 1637 10 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)REMOVE 1638 10 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve 1639 10 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)REMOVE 1640 8 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)REMOVE 1641 9 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)REMOVE 1642 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1643 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1644 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1645 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1646 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1647 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1648 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1649 11 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1650 15 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1651 12 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1652 14 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1653 8 Spruce - Colorado (Picea pungens)Preserve 1654 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1655 22 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1656 16 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1657 11 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1658 23 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1659 9 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1660 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1661 9 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1662 9 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1663 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1664 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1665 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1666 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1667 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1668 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1669 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1670 17 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 1671 15 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1672 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1673 16 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1674 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1675 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1676 14 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1677 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1678 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1679 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1680 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1681 12 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1682 17 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1683 16 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1684 15 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1685 28 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1686 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1687 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1688 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1689 10 Oak - White (Quercus alba)Preserve 1690 18 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1691 11 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1692 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1693 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1694 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1695 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1696 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1697 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1698 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1699 38 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1700 19 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)REMOVE 1701 18 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1702 10 Apple (Malus spp.)REMOVE 1703 9 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)REMOVE 1704 26 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1705 13 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)REMOVE 1706 13 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)REMOVE 1707 12 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)REMOVE 1708 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1709 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1710 27 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1711 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1712 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1713 19 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1714 15 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1715 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1716 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1717 19 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1718 19 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1719 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1720 21 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1721 22 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1722 18 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1723 22 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1724 20 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1725 24 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1726 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1727 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1728 19 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1729 18 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1730 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1731 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1732 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1733 16 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1734 19 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1735 32 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1736 16 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1737 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1738 18 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1739 30 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1740 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1741 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1742 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1743 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1744 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1745 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1746 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1747 21 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1748 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1749 9 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1750 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1751 22 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1752 25 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1753 25 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1754 27 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1755 18 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1756 23 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1757 9 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1758 26 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1759 18 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1760 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1761 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1762 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1763 25 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1764 20 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1765 18 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1766 44 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1767 36 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1768 18 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1769 22 Locust - Honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)REMOVE 1770 8 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1771 14 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1772 15 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1773 10 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1774 9 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1775 12 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1776 8 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1777 8 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1778 15 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1779 9 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1780 12 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1781 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1782 10 Willow - Black (Salix nigra)Preserve 1783 10 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1784 9 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1785 8 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1786 8 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1787 9 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1788 9 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1789 10 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1790 11 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1791 8 Willow - Black (Salix nigra)Preserve 1792 10 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1793 10 Willow - Black (Salix nigra)Preserve 1794 10 Willow - Black (Salix nigra)Preserve 1795 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1796 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1797 15 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1798 12 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1799 12 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1800 9 Willow - Black (Salix nigra)Preserve 1801 9 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1802 9 Willow - Black (Salix nigra)Preserve 1803 12 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1804 11 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1805 8 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1806 8 Willow - Black (Salix nigra)Preserve 1807 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1808 9 Willow - Black (Salix nigra)Preserve 1809 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1810 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1811 9 Willow - Black (Salix nigra)Preserve 1812 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1813 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1814 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1815 10 Willow - Black (Salix nigra)Preserve 1816 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1817 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1818 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 1819 15 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1820 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1821 20 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1822 15 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1823 23 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1824 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1825 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1826 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1827 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1828 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1829 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1830 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1831 15 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1832 21 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1833 22 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1834 15 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1835 22 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1836 38 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1837 18 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1838 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1839 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1840 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1841 12 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1842 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1843 13 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1844 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1845 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1846 12 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1847 12 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1848 9 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1849 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1850 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1851 11 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1852 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1853 16 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1854 12 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1855 11 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1856 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1857 11 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1858 40 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1859 19 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1860 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1861 9 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1862 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1863 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1864 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1865 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1866 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1867 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1868 11 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1869 8 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1870 12 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1871 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1872 11 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1873 12 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1874 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1875 16 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1876 15 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1877 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1878 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1879 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1880 14 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1881 11 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1882 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1883 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 1884 19 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1885 14 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1886 15 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1887 15 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)Preserve 1888 9 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1889 11 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1890 19 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1891 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1892 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1893 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1894 17 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)Preserve 1895 17 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1896 11 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)Preserve 1897 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)Preserve 1898 11 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1899 9 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1900 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1901 18 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1902 18 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve 1903 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve 1904 9 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1905 13 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1906 9 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1907 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 1908 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1909 9 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1910 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1911 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1912 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1913 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1914 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1915 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Preserve 1916 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1917 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1918 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1919 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1920 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve 1921 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve 1922 11 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve 1923 13 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1924 27 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)Preserve 1925 11 Birch - River (Betula nigra)Preserve 1926 10 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)Preserve 1927 9 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)Preserve 1928 10 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)REMOVE 1929 9 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)REMOVE 1930 10 Fir - Balsam (Abies balsamea)REMOVE 1931 11 Birch - River (Betula nigra)REMOVE 1932 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 1933 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 1934 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 1935 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 1936 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1937 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1938 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 1939 10 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1940 11 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1941 13 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1942 14 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1943 10 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1944 11 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 1945 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1946 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1947 13 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 1948 13 European Mountain Ash (Sorbus aucuparia)REMOVE 1949 8 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1950 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1951 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1952 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1953 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1954 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1955 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1956 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1957 11 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 1958 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1959 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1960 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1961 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1962 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1963 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1964 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1965 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1966 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1967 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1968 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1969 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1970 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1971 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1972 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1973 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1974 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1975 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1976 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1977 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1978 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1979 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1980 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1981 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1982 19 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1983 23 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1984 19 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1985 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1986 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1987 29 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1988 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1989 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 1990 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1991 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1992 21 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1993 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1994 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1995 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1996 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1997 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1998 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 1999 16 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 2000 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE REMOVE 1 17 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 2 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 3 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 4 19 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 5 17 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 6 16 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 7 8 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 8 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 9 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 10 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 11 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 12 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 13 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 14 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 15 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 16 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 17 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 18 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 19 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 20 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 21 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 22 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 23 17 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 24 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 25 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 26 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 27 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 28 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 29 15 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 30 21 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 31 11 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 32 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 33 9 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 34 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 35 28 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 36 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 37 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 38 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 39 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 40 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 41 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 42 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 43 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 44 22 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 45 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 46 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 47 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 48 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 49 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 50 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 51 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 52 16 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 53 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 54 10 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 55 18 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 56 16 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 57 12 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 58 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 59 15 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 60 20 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 61 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 62 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 63 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 64 19 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 65 11 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 66 9 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 67 24 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 68 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 69 14 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 70 14 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 71 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 72 15 Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)REMOVE 73 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 74 8 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 75 13 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 76 14 Basswood (Tilia americana)Preserve 77 9 Basswood (Tilia americana)Preserve 78 9 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)Preserve 79 17 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 80 8 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 81 10 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 82 13 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 83 8 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 84 8 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 85 13 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 86 10 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 87 12 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 88 11 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 89 12 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 90 18 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 91 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 92 10 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 93 16 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 94 15 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 95 20 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 96 15 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 97 16 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 98 8 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 99 12 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 100 14 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 101 13 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 102 8 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 103 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 104 9 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 105 17 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 106 15 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 107 13 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 108 19 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 109 11 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 110 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 111 8 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 112 16 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 113 15 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 114 12 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 115 19 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 116 13 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 117 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 118 18 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 119 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 120 12 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 121 10 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 122 18 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 123 15 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 124 8 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 125 13 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 126 14 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 127 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 128 8 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 129 16 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 130 12 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 131 11 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 132 12 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 133 11 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 134 30 Elm - Siberian (Ulmus pumula)REMOVE 135 15 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 136 11 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 137 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 138 11 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 139 12 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 140 8 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 141 14 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 142 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 143 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 144 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 145 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 146 13 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 147 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 148 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 149 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 150 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 151 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 152 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 153 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 154 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 155 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 156 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 157 14 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 158 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 159 39 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)Preserve 160 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 161 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 162 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 163 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 164 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 165 8 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 166 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 167 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 168 11 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 169 11 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 170 10 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 171 13 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 172 8 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 173 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 174 12 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 175 11 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 176 32 Oak - White (Quercus alba)REMOVE 177 30 Oak - White (Quercus alba)REMOVE 178 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 179 13 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 180 9 Maple - Silver (acer saccharinum)REMOVE 181 11 Ash - Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)REMOVE 182 13 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 183 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)REMOVE 184 9 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 185 31 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 186 26 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 187 22 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 188 10 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)Preserve 189 12 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)Preserve 190 8 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 191 33 Oak - White (Quercus alba)REMOVE 192 10 Basswood (Tilia americana)REMOVE 193 12 Elm - American (Ulmus americana)REMOVE 194 41 Oak - White (Quercus alba)REMOVE 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:32 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-L0-TREE.DWG:L0.02 TREE REMOVALS LISTTREE REMOVALS LIST L0.02 FND IP 1/2"OPEN TIPPEDFND IP 1/2" OPENFND IPCAPPED 24992FND IPCAPPED 24992WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022IE:947.51RE:948.68IE:945.73IE:946.6012" CMPRE:948.51IE:945.39NEIE:945.29WIE:945.20SE*1 2 " R C P12" RCP12" RCPRE:948.59IE:945.29NW*IE:945.70SE*12" D R A I N T I L E A P P R O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N (PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)(PER PLAN)>>>>>>>>UEUE UE >> EXISTING POND HWL: 947.47 NWL: 947.00 P O N D 1 2 N HW L : 9 4 6 . 8 0 NW L : 9 4 3 . 5 0 POND 13N HWL:948.52 NWL:946.50 EXISTING CEMETERY SWALE O S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNTE R S RI D G E HUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROADPOND 5NHWL:940.50NWL:938.50FILTRATION 6FHWL: 940.04POND 11N HWL:948.91 NWL:945.60 FILTRATION 11F HWL:948.91 FILTRATION 12F2HWL:946.59F I L T R A T I O N 1 2 F 1 HW L : 9 4 6 . 7 1COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAYTOT LOT POND 2NHWL:946.31NWL:944.00POND 4NHWL:948.67NWL:944.00SENIOR HOUSING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F.PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 28,800 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 31,300 S.F. (2 STORIES) FFE=952.00 PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. FFE=952.00 PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 8 UNITS FFE=948.254 UNITSFFE=951.0051 UNITS 5.52 ACRES 3.40 ACRES 5.65 ACRES 4.25 ACRES 122 UNITS IL/AL FFE=953 / GFE=942 184 UNITS FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FFE=952.00 1.2 ACRES 8 UNITS FFE=949.75 8 UNITSFFE=949.50 / LFE=941.508 UNITS FFE=948.50 28 MC Units MC GARDEN ACTIVE SENIOR 110 UNITS FFE=953 GFE=942 12345678910111213141516171819202223242526219 UNI T S FFE=9 5 2. 2 5 6 UNITSFFE=952.50LFE=944.50FFE=954 GFE=943 FILTRATION 3FHWL: 945.20REQUIRED AVG 35'BUFFER: 51751 SFEXISTING WETLAND HWL: 938.56 NWL: 937.88 148 UNITS 40,355 S.F. FFE=954.00 PROVIDED BUFFER:57281 SFPROPOSED MULTIFAMILY "A" PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROO F O F P A R KI N G DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT50.0'50.0'10.0' PROPOSED ROW 100.0' EXISTING ROW ENHANCED LANDSCAPINGENHANCED LANDSCAPINGASSUMED TUNNEL BOTTOM 15 FT BELOW PROPOSED STREET ELEVATION FFE=950.25FFE=950.25FFE=950.75FFE=950.75FFE=950FFE=950FFE=953.14FFE=952.87FFE=952.50FFE=952.20FFE=952.16FFE=952.37FFE=953.07FFE=953.92FFE=954.75FFE=955.16FFE=954.89FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00FFE=952.00LFE=948.00FFE=952.00LFE=948.00FFE=953.00LFE=949.00FFE=953.30LFE=949.30TPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPT PTP 83'64'96'77' 71' TYPE D BUFFER; 30' WITH FENCE TYPE D BUFFER; 30' WITH FENCE TYPE D BUFFER; 40' NO FENCE TYPE D BUFFER; 40' WITH FENCETYPE D BUFFER; 50' NO BERMTYP E D B U F F E R ; 30' W I T H F E N C E TYPE D BUFFER; 30' WITH FENCE SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:03 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-L1-LSCP.DWG:L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLAN© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023 John R. Workman 10/20/2023 59119 1 01/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 2 LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED GROUND COVER SCHEDULE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TPTREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:03 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-L1-LSCP.DWG:L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE PLAN L1.01 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT GROUND COVERS 25-131 MNDOT Seed Mix 25-131 / Low Maintenance Fescue mix Seed 33-261 MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 / Ponds and Wet Areas Seed 34-171 MNDOT Seed Mix 34-171 / Wetland Rehabilitation Seed PLANT SCHEDULE ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT HATCH SHALL BE SODDED NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:03 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-L1-LSCP.DWG:L1.02 PLANT SCHEDULES© 2021 Sambatek HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN PRELIMINARY PUD PLANS 51372 11/22/2023101/12/2024 EJC MA MA City Resubmittal 2 01/30/2024 EJC MA MA Preliminary Plan Resubmittal 224.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:03 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-L1-LSCP.DWG:L1.02 PLANT SCHEDULES24.1S (LMS TECH) | EMILY CASTANIAS, PE (MN) | 1/12/2024 3:39:03 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-L1-LSCP.DWG:L1.02 PLANT SCHEDULESPLANT SCHEDULES L1.02 CALCULATIONS MULTIFAMILY HOUSING "A"- ONE OVERSTORY TREE PER UNIT ENHANCED SCREENING REQUIREMENTS: (315 / 100 = 3.15) ONE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE ONE OVERSTORY CONIFEROUS TREE PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE 2 ORNAMENTAL TREES PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE 10 UNDERSTORY SHRUBS PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS (50'): 6 OVERSTORY TREES PER 100 LF (375/ 100) *6 = 23 9 UNDERSTORY TREES PER 100 LF (375/ 100) *9 = 34 18 SHRUBS PER 100 LF (375/ 100) *18 = 67 RETAIL "B,C,D,E"- ONE OVERSTORY TREE PER BUILDING AREA OR PER SITE PERIMETER WHICHEVER IS GREATER((110,300SF/ 1,000) =111 OR (2,768LF/ 50) =56) ONE UNDERSTORY SHRUB PER BUILDING AREA OR PER SITE PERIMETER WHICHEVER IS GREATER((110,300SF/ 300) =368 OR (2,768LF/ 30) =93) ENHANCED SCREENING REQUIREMENTS: (890 / 100 = 8.9) ONE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE ONE OVERSTORY CONIFEROUS TREE PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE 2 ORNAMENTAL TREES PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE 10 UNDERSTORY SHRUBS PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING "F"- ONE OVERSTORY TREE PER UNIT ENHANCED SCREENING REQUIREMENTS: (706 / 100 = 7.06) ONE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE ONE OVERSTORY CONIFEROUS TREE PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE 2 ORNAMENTAL TREES PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE 10 UNDERSTORY SHRUBS PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE VILLAS "I"- ONE OVERSTORY TREE PER UNIT BUFFER REQUIREMENTS (30'): 6 OVERSTORY TREES PER 100 LF (687/ 100) *6 = 42 9 UNDERSTORY TREES PER 100 LF (687/ 100) *9 = 62 36 SHRUBS PER 100 LF (687/ 100) *36 = 248 6' FENCE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS (40'): 4 OVERSTORY TREES PER 100 LF (535/ 100) *4 = 22 6 UNDERSTORY TREES PER 100 LF (535/ 100) *6 = 33 24 SHRUBS PER 100 LF (535/ 100) *24 = 129 6'FENCE ROWHOMES "J"- ONE OVERSTORY TREE PER UNIT ENHANCED SCREENING REQUIREMENTS: (410 / 100 = 4.1) ONE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE ONE OVERSTORY CONIFEROUS TREE PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE 2 ORNAMENTAL TREES PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE 10 UNDERSTORY SHRUBS PER 100 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS (30'): 6 OVERSTORY TREES PER 100 LF (122/ 100) *6 = 8 9 UNDERSTORY TREES PER 100 LF (122/ 100) *9 = 11 36 SHRUBS PER 100 LF (122/ 100) *36 = 44 6' FENCE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS (50'): 6 OVERSTORY TREES PER 100 LF (549/ 100) *6 = 33 9 UNDERSTORY TREES PER 100 LF (549/ 100) *9 = 50 18 SHRUBS PER 100 LF (549/ 100) *18 = 99 SENIOR HOUSING- ONE OVERSTORY TREE PER UNIT TOTAL TREES REQUIRED CORCORAN LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS PROPOSED 95 4 4 7 32 23 34 67 140 - 9 9 17 89 148 8 8 15 71 64 42 62 248 43 65 129 65 5 5 9 41 8 11 44 33 50 99 253 1,183 REQUIRED 156 4 4 7 32 23 34 67 111 368 9 9 17 89 184 8 8 15 71 26 42 62 248 22 33 129 50 5 5 9 41 8 11 44 33 50 99 238 1,183 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 1 RB Betula nigra `Cully` TM / Heritage Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 12 WS Betula papyrifera `Whitespire` / Whitespire Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 17 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 10 QA Populus tremuloides / Quaking Aspen B & B 2.5"Cal 14 SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 5 BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 2.5"Cal 4 PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 8 CONIFERS LR Larix laricina / Tamarack B & B 6`11 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 6`22 WP Pinus strobus / White Pine B & B 6`19 PW Pinus strobus `Fastigiata` / Pyramidal White Pine B & B 6`3 ORN. TREES SB Amelanchier canadensis `Autumn Brilliance` / Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry B & B 2"Cal 21 HT Crataegus crus-galli `Inermis` / Thornless Hawthorn B & B 2.5"Cal 16 JL Syringa reticulata / Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 3 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY SHRUBS YD Cornus alba `Bud`s Yellow` / Bud`s Yellow Dogwood 5 gal 6 RD Cornus baileyi / Bailey`s Red-twig Dogwood 5 gal 28 FF Forsythia x `Fiesta` / Fiesta Forsythia 5 gal 10 DW Salix purpurea `Nana` / Dwarf Arctic Willow 5 gal 26 LB Syringa x `Bloomerang` / Lilac 5 gal 28 PLANT SCHEDULE MULTIFAMILY "A" SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 28 RB Betula nigra `Cully` TM / Heritage Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 3 WS Betula papyrifera `Whitespire` / Whitespire Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 17 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 10 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 10 QA Populus tremuloides / Quaking Aspen B & B 2.5"Cal 15 SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 12 BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 2.5"Cal 25 PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 5 CONIFERS LR Larix laricina / Tamarack B & B 6`11 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 6`9 WP Pinus strobus / White Pine B & B 6`12 ORN. TREES SB Amelanchier canadensis `Autumn Brilliance` / Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry B & B 2"Cal 12 SS Malus x `Spring Snow` / Spring Snow Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 5 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY SHRUBS RD Cornus baileyi / Bailey`s Red-twig Dogwood 5 gal 32 FF Forsythia x `Fiesta` / Fiesta Forsythia 5 gal 26 LB Syringa x `Bloomerang` / Lilac 5 gal 31 PLANT SCHEDULE RETAIL "B,C,D,E" SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 13 RB Betula nigra `Cully` TM / Heritage Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 7 WS Betula papyrifera `Whitespire` / Whitespire Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 15 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 15 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 23 QA Populus tremuloides / Quaking Aspen B & B 2.5"Cal 8 BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 2.5"Cal 13 PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 14 CONIFERS LR Larix laricina / Tamarack B & B 6`9 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 6`35 WP Pinus strobus / White Pine B & B 6`12 ORN. TREES SS Malus x `Spring Snow` / Spring Snow Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 15 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY SHRUBS FF Forsythia x `Fiesta` / Fiesta Forsythia 5 gal 12 AC Ribes alpinum / Alpine Currant 5 gal 23 LB Syringa x `Bloomerang` / Lilac 5 gal 36 PLANT SCHEDULE MULTIFAMILY "F" SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 31 RB Betula nigra `Cully` TM / Heritage Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 21 WS Betula papyrifera `Whitespire` / Whitespire Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 20 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 12 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 6 QA Populus tremuloides / Quaking Aspen B & B 2.5"Cal 36 SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 19 BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 2.5"Cal 10 PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 42 CONIFERS BF Abies balsamea / Balsam Fir B & B 6`3 LR Larix laricina / Tamarack B & B 6`31 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 6`11 WP Pinus strobus / White Pine B & B 6`18 PW Pinus strobus `Fastigiata` / Pyramidal White Pine B & B 6`9 ORN. TREES SB Amelanchier canadensis `Autumn Brilliance` / Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry B & B 2"Cal 4 HT Crataegus crus-galli `Inermis` / Thornless Hawthorn B & B 2.5"Cal 11 SS Malus x `Spring Snow` / Spring Snow Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 6 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY SHRUBS YD Cornus alba `Bud`s Yellow` / Bud`s Yellow Dogwood 5 gal 5 RD Cornus baileyi / Bailey`s Red-twig Dogwood 5 gal 5 LH Hydrangea paniculata `Jane` / Little Lime Hydrangea 5 gal 30 AC Ribes alpinum / Alpine Currant 5 gal 34 PLANT SCHEDULE SENIOR HOUSING SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 10 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 7 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 4 BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 2.5"Cal 2 PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 6 CONIFERS BF Abies balsamea / Balsam Fir B & B 6`16 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 6`14 WP Pinus strobus / White Pine B & B 6`17 ORN. TREES SB Amelanchier canadensis `Autumn Brilliance` / Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry B & B 2"Cal 29 HT Crataegus crus-galli `Inermis` / Thornless Hawthorn B & B 2.5"Cal 33 SS Malus x `Spring Snow` / Spring Snow Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 13 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY SHRUBS YD Cornus alba `Bud`s Yellow` / Bud`s Yellow Dogwood 5 gal 83 RD Cornus baileyi / Bailey`s Red-twig Dogwood 5 gal 13 FF Forsythia x `Fiesta` / Fiesta Forsythia 5 gal 85 LH Hydrangea paniculata `Jane` / Little Lime Hydrangea 5 gal 65 AC Ribes alpinum / Alpine Currant 5 gal 17 LB Syringa x `Bloomerang` / Lilac 5 gal 24 PLANT SCHEDULE VILLAS "I" SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 8 RB Betula nigra `Cully` TM / Heritage Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 22 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 9 QA Populus tremuloides / Quaking Aspen B & B 2.5"Cal 6 SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 10 BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 2.5"Cal 11 PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 5 CONIFERS BF Abies balsamea / Balsam Fir B & B 6`19 LR Larix laricina / Tamarack B & B 6`10 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 6`19 WP Pinus strobus / White Pine B & B 6`13 PW Pinus strobus `Fastigiata` / Pyramidal White Pine B & B 6`9 ORN. TREES SB Amelanchier canadensis `Autumn Brilliance` / Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry B & B 2"Cal 31 SS Malus x `Spring Snow` / Spring Snow Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 12 JL Syringa reticulata / Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 27 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY SHRUBS YD Cornus alba `Bud`s Yellow` / Bud`s Yellow Dogwood 5 gal 21 RD Cornus baileyi / Bailey`s Red-twig Dogwood 5 gal 45 FF Forsythia x `Fiesta` / Fiesta Forsythia 5 gal 36 AC Ribes alpinum / Alpine Currant 5 gal 18 DW Salix purpurea `Nana` / Dwarf Arctic Willow 5 gal 41 LB Syringa x `Bloomerang` / Lilac 5 gal 23 PLANT SCHEDULE ROWHOMES "J" HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EXAMPLE PHASING PLAN CORCORAN, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 22, 2023 measure COUNTY ROAD 30 COUNTY ROAD 116PHASE 1 PHASE 4 PHASE 2-3 PHASE 2 Attachment Item: 8a14. HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURAL EXAMPLES 4 STORY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING & SENIOR LIVING SENIOR VILLAS NOVEMBER 22, 2023 measure Attachment Item: 8a15. HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURAL EXAMPLES ROW TOWNHOMES NOVEMBER 22, 2023 MEDICAL OFFICE COMMERCIAL/ RETAIL measure Attachment Item: 8a16. Attachment Item: 8a17. Hope Community Church Development Infrastructure Feasibility Study May 2023 Prepared for: City of Corcoran, MN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. One Carlson Parkway Plymouth, MN 55447 Project Number: 193806190_112 Attachment Item: 8a18. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN May 2023 Project Number: 193806190-112 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1.1 2.0 TRANSPORTATION........................................................................................................2.1 2.1 BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................2.1 2.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS......................................................2.1 2.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................2.1 2.4 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ...................................................................................................2.2 2.5 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................2.4 2.6 FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................2.7 3.0 SEWER AND WATER .....................................................................................................3.8 3.1 SEWER ............................................................................................................................3.8 3.2 WATER ............................................................................................................................3.8 3.2.1 Demands ........................................................................................................3.9 3.2.2 Scenario Descriptions ....................................................................................3.9 3.2.3 Scenario 1 - Tower On, Maple Grove Off .....................................................3.10 3.2.4 Scenario 2 - Maple Grove On, Tower Off .....................................................3.10 3.3 FINDINGS ......................................................................................................................3.11 4.0 WATER RESOURCES ..................................................................................................4.12 4.1 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ..........................................................................................4.12 4.2 WATERSHED SETTING AND LAND USE ....................................................................4.12 4.3 WETLANDS ...................................................................................................................4.13 4.4 ROADWAY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS...................................................................4.13 4.5 FINDINGS ......................................................................................................................4.13 5.0 FINANCING .....................................................................................................................5.1 5.1 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................5.1 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................................6.1 TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................................................6.1 SEWER ........................................................................................................................................6.1 WATER ........................................................................................................................................6.2 WATER RESOURCES ................................................................................................................6.2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project ............................................................2.2 Table 2: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes....................................................................2.3 Table 3: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes....................................................................2.4 Table 4: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results ......................................................2.5 Table 5: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results ......................................................2.6 HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN May 2023 Project Number: 193806190-112 FIGURES Figure 1 Site Plan APPENDICES Appendix A Sewer Comprehensive Plan System Appendix B NE Water System Appendix C Stormwater Modeling Guidelines and Floodplain HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Introduction May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 1.0 Introduction Hope Community Church Development representatives have been planning for developing this parcel for over 20 years and has submitted a concept to develop a multi-purpose campus that maintains the church operations and expands the site to include housing for seniors along with more diverse uses such as commercial and medical. The concept shows that full development provides 738 varied housing units and up to 110,300 square feet of commercial, retail, and medical office space. This study reviews the City infrastructure components involved in development that consists of transportation, sewer, water and stormwater. Although the City is the lead for the local government process, there are multiple agencies involved with reviewing and issuing permits or approvals for the development including Hennepin County (CR 116 and CR30 access and septic abandonment), Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA—Construction Stormwater and sewer system), Minnesota Department of Health (MDH--watermain), Elm Creek Water Management Commission (stormwater), and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES—trunk sewer compliance). This site has a significant ongoing infrastructure component for water supply, in that the project is scheduled to use the City’s Water Treatment Plant and Tower unless a temporary contract amendment with Corcoran and Maple Grove is executed. . HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 2.0 Transportation 2.1 Background This study examined weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: CSAH 30/CR 116 CR 116/Oswald Farm Road CSAH 30/access (future) 2.2 Proposed Development Characteristics For purpose of the traffic impact analysis, the proposed development is assumed to consist of the following uses: Rowhomes – 54 dwelling units Villas – 20 dwelling units Senior housing – 324 dwelling units Apartments – 340 dwelling units Medical office – 72,160 square feet General office – 18,040 square feet Coffee shop – 4,000 square feet Fast casual restaurant – 4,000 square feet Retail – 12,100 square feet Access will be provided on the north by reconfiguring the connection of Oswald Farm Road and Hunters Ridge and on the south via a new connection to CSAH 30. 2.3 Existing Conditions The proposed project site is currently partially utilized by Hope Community Church, which will remain at its current location. The site is bounded by CSAH 30 on the south, agricultural land on the west, existing residential uses on the north, and CR 116 on the east. Near the site location, CSAH 30 and CR 116 are two lane undivided roadways with turn lanes and traffic signal control at major intersections. Oswald Farm Road is a local two-lane roadway. Existing conditions near the proposed project location are described below. CSAH 30/CR 116 - This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound, northbound, and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane with a channelized right turn island. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 CR 116/Oswald Farm - This four-way intersection is controlled on two legs with stop signs on the eastbound and westbound approaches. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn/through lane and one through/right turn lane. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane, with turn lanes under design as part of the Bellwether development. Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at the existing intersections in February, 2023. Existing traffic volume data is presented later in this report. 2.4 Traffic Forecasts To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the years 2028 and 2040. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: 2023 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. 2028 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.6 percent per year to determine 2028 No-Build volumes. The 1.6 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on historic traffic volume growth in the project area and traffic forecast information presented in the Corcoran Comprehensive Plan. 2028 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2028 No-Build volumes to determine 2028 Build volumes. 2040 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.6 percent per year to determine 2040 No-Build volumes. The 1.6 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on historic traffic volume growth in the project area and traffic forecast information presented in the Corcoran Comprehensive Plan. 2040 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2040 No-Build volumes to determine 2040 Build volumes. The expected new development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The gross trip generation totals were reduced by 10 percent to account for internal trips. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 1. Table 1: Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use (ITE Code)Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Rowhomes (215)54 DU 6 20 26 18 13 31 389 Villas (210)20 DU 4 10 14 12 7 19 189 Senior Housing (252)324 DU 22 43 65 46 35 81 1050 Apartments (221)340 DU 29 97 126 81 52 133 1543 HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 Medical Office (720)72,160 SF 177 47 224 85 199 284 2598 General Office (710)18,040 SF 25 2 27 4 22 26 196 Coffee Shop (937)4,000 SF 176 168 344 78 78 156 2134 Fast Casual Restaurant (930) 4,000 SF 2 4 6 28 22 50 388 Retail (822)12,100 SF 17 11 28 40 40 80 659 Totals 458 402 860 392 468 860 9146 10% reduction for internal trips (46)(40)(86)(39)(47)(86)(915) Net Totals 412 362 774 353 421 774 8231 Notes:SF=square feet and DU=dwelling units The coffee shop, restaurant, and retail trips can be categorized in the following trip types: New Trips. Trips solely to and from the proposed development. Pass-By Trips. Trips that are attracted from the traffic volume on roadways immediately adjacent to the site. Based on information published in the Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the percentage of each trip type is as follows: 60% new, 40% pass by Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are described below: 15 percent to/from the north on CR 116 70 percent to/from the east on CSAH 30 5 percent to/from the west on CSAH 30 10 percent to/from the south on CR 116 Development trips from Table 1 were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant peak hour volumes are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CR 116/ Hunters/ Oswald EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2023 Existing 8 0 14 1 0 0 13 80 0 1 389 13 2028 No-Build 9 0 15 1 0 0 14 87 0 1 421 14 2028 Build 60 0 180 1 0 0 170 80 0 1 400 87 2040 No-Build 10 0 18 1 0 0 17 105 0 1 509 17 2040 Build 61 0 183 1 0 0 173 98 0 1 488 90 CSAH 30/CR 116 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 2023 Existing 6 499 37 88 120 27 7 60 58 87 302 9 2028 No-Build 6 540 40 95 130 29 8 65 63 94 327 10 2028 Build 6 618 47 95 231 160 23 83 63 220 345 10 2040 No-Build 8 654 48 115 157 35 9 79 76 114 396 12 2040 Build 8 732 59 115 266 166 25 97 76 240 414 12 CSAH 30/access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2023 Existing -542 --136 ------- 2028 No-Build -587 --147 ------- 2028 Build 48 555 --137 135 ---121 -25 2040 No-Build -710 --178 ------- 2040 Build 48 678 --168 135 ---121 -25 Table 3: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CR 116/ Hunters/ Oswald EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2023 Existing 13 0 15 3 0 0 17 365 2 0 135 10 2028 No-Build 14 0 16 3 0 0 18 395 2 0 146 11 2028 Build 85 0 190 3 0 0 175 379 2 0 141 60 2040 No-Build 17 0 20 4 0 0 22 478 3 0 177 13 2040 Build 88 0 194 4 0 0 179 462 3 0 172 62 CSAH 30/CR 116 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2023 Existing 11 283 13 56 488 78 34 295 131 51 83 17 2028 No-Build 12 306 14 61 528 84 37 319 142 55 90 18 2028 Build 12 417 28 61 584 215 45 338 142 203 111 18 2040 No-Build 14 371 17 73 639 102 45 386 172 67 109 22 2040 Build 14 482 33 73 718 233 56 405 172 215 130 22 CSAH 30/access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2023 Existing -307 --539 ------- 2028 No-Build -332 --584 ------- 2028 Build 27 321 --563 111 ---138 -39 2040 No-Build -402 --706 ------- 2040 Build 2 391 --685 111 ---138 -39 2.5 Traffic Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. The existing northbound and southbound by-pass lanes on CR 116 at Hunters Ridge/Oswald will be replaced with left and right turn lanes with the 2023 turn lane improvements. The modified geometrics were used for all future analysis scenarios. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. The LOS results for the study intersections are presented in Tables 4 and 5. Table 4: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results CR 116/Hunters /Oswald EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing B B B B B B A A A A A A A 2028 No-Build B B B B B B A A A A A A A 2028 Build D D D C C C A A A A A A A 2040 No-Build B B B B B B A A A A A A A 2040 Build E E E D D D A A A A A A B CSAH 30/ CR 116 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing B B B B A A B B C B C B B 2028 No-Build B B B B B A C C C B C B B 2028 Build B C B B B A C C C C C C C 2040 No-Build B C B B B A C C C C C C C 2040 Build B C B C B A C D D C D C C HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 CSAH 30/ access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing -A --A -------A 2028 No-Build -A --A -------A 2028 Build A A --A A ---C -A A 2040 No-Build -A --A -------A 2040 Build A A --A ----D -A A Table 5: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results CR 116/Hunters /Oswald EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing B B B B B B A A A A A A A 2028 No-Build B B B B B B A A A A A A A 2028 Build C C C D D D A A A A A A A 2040 No-Build B B B C C C A A A A A A A 2040 Build E E E D D D A A A A A A B CSAH 30/ CR 116 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing B B B B B A B C B B B B B 2028 No-Build B B B B B A B C B B B B B 2028 Build B C B B C A C C C C B B C 2040 No-Build B B B B C A B C C C C C C 2040 Build C C B B D A C E D D C C D CSAH 30/ access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing -A --A -------A 2028 No-Build -A --A -------A 2028 Build A A --A A ---E -A A 2040 No-Build -A --A -------A 2040 Build A A --A ----F -A A Under existing, 2028 No-Build, 2028 Build, and 2040 No-Build conditions, all movements and intersections operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Under 2040 Build conditions, the southbound left turn at the CSAH 30/access intersection operates at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. The overall intersection operates at LOS A during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. All other movements and intersections operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Vehicle queues for exiting movements at the site access points under 2040 Build conditions were reviewed to determine the recommended turn lane lengths. The 95th percentile maximum queue for eastbound movements at the CR 116/Oswald intersection was 81 feet during the a.m. peak hour and 73 feet during the p.m. peak hour. At the CSAH 30/access intersection, the 95th percentile maximum queue for southbound movements was 80 feet during the a.m. peak hour and 107 feet during the p.m. peak hour. Under existing conditions at the CSAH 30/CR 116 intersection, the westbound right turn movement is accommodated with a channelized island but no dedicated right turn lane. As traffic volumes increase due to background growth and development traffic, the lack of a dedicated right turn lane impacts overall HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 intersection operations. In order to adequately accommodate traffic volumes, a dedicated westbound right turn lane is recommended at this intersection. 2.6 Findings The following mitigation measures are recommended at each intersection: CSAH 30/CR 116 o Construct dedicated westbound right lane 300 feet in length. CR 116/Hunters Ridge/Oswald Farm o Previously programmed northbound and southbound left and right turn lane improvements will provide access at intersection. o Widen eastbound Oswald Farm and widen westbound Hunters Ridge to provide a 200 foot left turn lane and through / right lane. New CSAH 30 access o Construct a 300-foot eastbound left turn and westbound right turn lanes on CSAH 30. Construct southbound approach with 200-foot left turn and right turn lanes. County will review their system as part of the EAW process and ensure the County system is adequate to handle increased volumes and patterns. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Sewer and Water May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 3.0 Sewer and Water The development is located near the west boundary of the 2040 MUSA, and trunk utilities will need to be extended to and through the site. 3.1 Sewer The development can be serviced by extending the trunk main from its planned location at the west boundary of Water Treatment Plant site. Currently the trunk terminates in the Bellwether development and a City project will install the 30-inch line to the east ROW of CR 116. The development will be responsible for extending the sewer trunk from the City’s Water Treatment parcel and continue through the site at elevations consistent with the Trunk Sewer Comprehensive Plan. The alignment is shown within development’s street and CR 116 ROWs and alignment and ROW/easement widths will be reviewed with the development construction plan process. Currently the 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows the trunk alignment crosses beneath Hunters Ridge Road just northwest of its junction with Oswald Farm Road (Appendix A) and follows the low area/wetland north of Hope Community Church to the west property boundary. The trunk sewer invert is planned for elevation 905.2 (Node NE 5 at Water Treatment Plant) resulting in a 42-foot cut through the road corridor based on existing topography. Other factors to be coordinated include the development’s construction phasing, the water tower construction activities, and Hope Church operations. Sewer stubs/laterals will be extended for adjacent properties consistent with City policy. Preliminary finding would be a stub for future installation to service the existing development of Hunters Ridge Road and a stub towards CR 116 for Node NE 6 shown in Appendix A . Offsite work is typically designed and managed by the City under an escrow process. Agency permitting will be extensive and involve MCES, WCA, County, and MPCA. 3.2 Water Corcoran has authorized contracts for construction of a water treatment plant (WTP) and an elevated storage tank (tower) in the NE Zone with planned operation at the end of 2024. This development is contingent upon an operational system unless a modification of the Corcoran/Maple Grove water supply contract is executed. A 2021 feasibility study for raw water wells and pipes is also included in Appendix B. For the purposes of this report, the main analysis was executed assuming the WTP and tower are operational, with the tower providing the hydraulic grade line (WTP pumps off). An additional worst-case scenario was evaluated in which both the Tower and WTP are offline, with the existing 16-inch interconnect with Maple Grove providing the hydraulic grade line. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Sewer and Water May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 3.2.1 Demands The demands for the development were estimated using data from the developer-provided site plan. The site plan included numbers of residential units and commercial uses with proposed square footages. Average demands for residential uses were calculated based on the number of units and relative residential densities in accordance with previous Corcoran water studies. Demand estimates for commercial/institutional uses were based on occupied square footage and type of use. The calculated demand for each building shown on the concept site plan was assigned a model node. The table below presents the average and maximum day demands calculated for each building and assigned to each node within the Hope Community Church Development. A factor of 3.0 was used to calculate maximum day demands from average day demands. Peak hour demands (not shown in the table) were calculated using a factor of 2.0 multiplied by maximum day demands. Avg Day Flow Avg Day Demand Max Day DemandBuildingBuilding Type gal/day Node gal/day gal/day A Multi-Fam Housing 28,800 B Retail 1,600 C Medical 7,000 J-264 37,400 112,200 D Medical 5,800 E Retail 1,600 K Church 6,000 J-265 13,400 40,200 F Multi-Fam Housing 35,100 G Senior Housing 46,800 J-263 81,900 245,700 H 55+ Housing 27,300 I Villas 4,500 J-261 31,800 95,400 J Row Homes 12,400 J-262 12,400 37,200 The total NE Zone system demands used for each scenario are shown below. Average Day – 0.32 MGD Maximum Day – 0.95 MGD Peak Hour – 1,321 gal/min 3.2.2 Scenario Descriptions A map of the NE Zone pipe network that was used for this modeling work is shown on Figure 1 of Appendix B. The Hope Community Church Development area watermains are proposed to include 20-inch trunk main and 8-inch water mains. Scenario 1 evaluated predicted pressures and available fire flows within the NE Zone with the tower providing the hydraulic grade and the WTP pumps and connection to Maple Grove turned off. The assumed water levels in the tower were 5 ft below overflow for average day and 10 ft below overflow for maximum day and peak hour demand conditions. Scenario 2 evaluated predicted pressures and available fire flow within the NE Zone with the 16-inch Maple Grove connection providing the hydraulic grade and the tower and WTP off. The assumed hydraulic grade at the Maple Grove interconnect was 1,093 ft for all demand conditions. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Sewer and Water May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 For fire flow analyses, the industry standard minimum residual pressure of 20 psi was used. For residential areas, a target fire flow of 1,500 gpm is assumed. For commercial/industrial areas, a higher target fire flow of 3,000 gpm is typical. New commercial/industrial buildings may be sprinklered and, as such, most of these buildings will ultimately have a lower acceptable target. However, 3,000 gpm is deemed a reasonable overall target, and allows for some conservatism in this safety-driven parameter. These targets are only estimates for planning purposes and do not represent a rating for the site. 3.2.3 Scenario 1 - Tower On, Maple Grove Off The results for this scenario for the nodes within the proposed Hope Community Church Development are shown in the table below. The full results for all nodes in the NE Zone with Tower On are shown in Appendix B Table 1. Additionally, the average day pressure results and maximum day available fire flow results for this scenario are mapped in Figures 2 and 3 of Appendix B, respectively. Node Elevation (ft) Average Day Demand (gpm) Average Day Pressure (psi) Max Day Fire Flow (Available) (gpm) J-261 946 22.1 68.8 2,562 J-262 952 8.6 66.2 3,255 J-263 950.3 56.8 66.9 >5,000 J-264 952 25.8 66.2 >5,000 J-265 952.2 9.2 66.1 >5,000 As shown above, average day pressures are within the 60-70 psi range. Modeling also indicates that during the peak hour (of maximum day, a condition of rare occurrence), pressure in the development area fall by approximately 7-8 psi. This means the lowest expected pressure within the development is approximately 58.8 psi, which is above the recommended minimum of 35 psi. The maximum available fire flows along the 20-inch trunk main are over 5,000 gpm. However, J-261, which would supply multistory senior housing and residential villas, is modeled at approximately 2,600 gpm available fire flow, above the 1,500 gpm target. 3.2.4 Scenario 2 - Maple Grove On, Tower Off The results for this scenario for the nodes within the proposed Hope Community Church Development are shown in the table below. The full results for all nodes in the NE Zone with Maple Grove connection on are shown in Appendix B Table 2. Additionally, the average day pressure results and maximum day available fire flow results for this scenario are mapped in Figures 4 and 5 of Appendix B, respectively. Node Elevation (ft) Average Day Demand (gpm) Average Day Pressure (psi) Max Day Fire Flow (Available) (gpm) J-261 946 22.1 63.3 1,582 J-262 952 8.6 60.7 1,732 J-263 950.3 56.8 61.5 2,258 J-264 952 25.8 60.7 2,233 J-265 952.2 9.2 60.6 2,243 HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Sewer and Water May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 As shown above, average day pressures are within the 60-65 psi range. Modeling also indicates that during the peak hour (of maximum day, a condition of rare occurrence), pressures in the development area fall by approximately 7-8 psi. This means the lowest expected pressure within the development is approximately 53 psi, which is above the recommended minimum of 35 psi. Under this scenario, all of the fire flows within the Hope Community Church Development nodes are below the 3,000-gpm target for commercial uses but exceed the 1,500-gpm target for residential areas. 3.3 Findings The following mitigation measures are required for sewer and water: Sewer Sewer trunk will need to be extended from the City’s Water Treatment Plant site and installed at inverts consistent with the City’s 2040 Sewer Comprehensive Plan and shall be responsibility of Developer. Onsite alignment is currently within development roads, and these will be finalized during Construction Plan approval process. ROW and easement needs are based on pipe depth, for example ROW is a minimum of 60 feet for any internal streets with trunk sewer at 30 feet, and combination of ROW and larger easement will be coordinated with City for sewer depths greater than 30 feet. A lateral will be extended to north property border within Hunter’s Ridge Road for future connection of the existing development. Stub will be installed to east boundary of property along CR 116 for future service for Node NE 6 as shown in City NE Sewer Comprehensive Plan. Water This development is contingent upon an operational NE Corcoran treatment plant and tower, unless an amendment to the existing Maple Grove water agreement is obtained. Both the Tower and Maple Grove connection can provide average day pressure within an range of 60-70 psi at ground elevation. Supply from Maple Grove will result in slightly less pressure. Construction of the water tower shows that target fire flows of 3,000 gpm can be provided to the Hope Community Development Area. Extend a 20-inch trunk water main to the tower from the treatment plant and also south from the tower to the CR-30 ROW. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Water Resources May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 Loop the west property boundary with 8-inch lateral from Oswald Farm Way to Hope Road for redundancy and water quality, depending on timing and phasing of development. A dedicated lot for a future municipal well should be shown to provide a well site consistent with City water supply needs. Provide 20 foot easement and install the raw water line along CR 116 for municipal water supply. Provide 20 foot easement along CR30 for future raw water supply from the west. 4.0 Water Resources 4.1 Regulatory Overview Stormwater management regulations in the proposed project area would be guided or directed by Corcoran’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (Local Plan) the City’s Guidelines, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and MS4 requirements. Each of these documents has a larger regulatory context: The Local Plan reflects the goals, policies and rules of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission’s Third Generation Watershed Management Plan (Commission’s WMP). The SWPPP is a requirement of the City’s stormwater permit, also known as the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. The MS4 permit is issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) which was reissued in October of 2021. Among other goals, both documents include plans to meet pollutant load reductions calculated in the Elm Creek Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study. TMDL studies are required for surface waters that are designated as impaired – in other words, those that do not meet one or more State water quality standards. City guidelines lay out the required modeling parameters, preferred BMPs and some construction materials. City approval is required prior to application for the WMO approval process. Further City review occurs with construction plan approval process. 4.2 Watershed Setting and Land Use Stormwater is manageable for the site and will be subject to City stormwater guidelines, wetland regulations and Elm Creek Watershed approval. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Water Resources May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 Stormwater management for the concept plan is shown on the perimeter of the site with basins on the northwest, west, southeast and southwest. This site has high percentage of impervious and rate control will be accomplished in ponds and filtration basins. o Perimeter discharge locations will be reviewed for downstream conveyance capacity. The watershed reviews the abstraction and water quality components, along with rate control. No FEMA floodplain exists on site (see Figure C-1 in Appendix C) and for reference the nearest floodplain to the west is identified at a 915 elevation as compared to the onsite low area (wetland) at a 940 contour and the northeast low corner is a 935 elevation. The urban/rural fringe is challenging for drainage and the City reviews potential offsite drainage impacts for the additional volume associated with increased urbanization (impervious roads and rooftops). The City has required prior developments to study these impacts and also, when necessary, make offsite improvements. This same approach will be applied during the Hope Community approval process when stormwater management and grading plans are available. 4.3 Wetlands Significant wetlands exist and the formal process will need to be followed and the EAW has a wetland review component. Corcoran is the LGU for the WCA process. 4.4 Roadway Drainage Improvements Development should provide treatment for required road improvements when feasible. 4.5 Findings Stormwater is manageable for the site, although modifications will occur during the City and approval process. City stormwater guidelines will be utilized (see Appendix C) that cover modeling and drainage items. These guidelines will be updated with the 2023 Engineering Standards update prior to final plat approval. A City stormwater area charge may be in place prior to final plat. Modeling and grading plan will be reviewed with the preliminary plat process and strategies for mitigation of offsite volume or conveyance impacts will be determined. Hope Development will be required to provide on site stormwater management for offsite road improvements, where feasible. Draintile information shall be provided with existing conditions analysis of the site. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Financing May 2023 Project Number: 193806190-112 5.0 Financing 5.1 Summary Financing options of the development necessary for infrastructure and to mitigate impacts typically follow the approach of: On-site infrastructure is managed by the developer. Stormwater fee may be implemented by City prior to final plat. All trunk fees (TLAC) and potential stormwater area charge will be due at the time of final plat. Off-site projects are typically managed by the by City (engineering, bidding and construction management) through an escrow. The details of area fees, credits, and infrastructure financial commitments will be identified in the Developer Agreement, which is updated with each phase of the development 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The following infrastructure improvements are feasible and necessary to manage the development. These improvements are consistent with similar requirements for other developments in Corcoran, and have shown to be necessary for managing the additional population: Transportation CSAH 30/CR 116 o Construct dedicated westbound right lane 300 feet in length. CR 116/Hunters Ridge/Oswald Farm o Previously programmed northbound and southbound left and right turn lane improvements will provide access at intersection. o Widen eastbound Oswald Farm and widen westbound Hunters Ridge to provide a 200 foot left turn lane and through / right lane. New CSAH 30 access o Construct a 300-foot eastbound left turn and westbound right turn lanes on CSAH 30. Construct southbound approach with 200-foot left turn and right turn lanes. County will review their system as a responsibility of permitting the improvements and review during the EAW process to ensure the County system is adequate to handle increased volumes and patterns. Sewer Sewer trunk will need to be extended from the City’s Water Treatment Plant site and installed at inverts consistent with the City’s 2040 Sewer Comprehensive Plan and shall be responsibility of Developer. Onsite alignment is currently within development roads, and these will be finalized during Construction Plan approval process. ROW and easement needs are based on pipe depth, for example ROW is a minimum of 60 feet for any internal streets with trunk sewer at 30 feet, and combination of ROW and larger easement will be coordinated with City for sewer depths greater than 30 feet. A lateral will be extended to north property border within Hunter’s Ridge Road for future connection of the existing development. Stub will be installed to east boundary of property along CR 116 for future service for Node NE 6 as shown in City NE Sewer Comprehensive Plan. Water This development is contingent upon an operational NE Corcoran treatment plant and tower, unless an amendment to the existing Maple Grove water agreement is obtained. Both the Tower and Maple Grove connection can provide average day pressure in Hope Community Church’s proposed 20-inch and 8-inch water main within an ideal range of 60-70 psi. Supply from Maple Grove will result in slightly less pressure. Construction of the water tower shows that target fire flows of 3,000 gpm can be provided to the Hope Community Church Development Area. Extend a 20-inch trunk water main to the tower from the treatment plant and also south from the tower to the CR-30 Right of Way. Loop the west property boundary with 8-inch lateral from Oswald Farm Way to Hope Road for redundancy and water quality, depending on timing and phasing of development. A dedicated lot for a future municipal well should be shown to provide a well site consistent with City water supply needs. Provide 20-foot easement and install the raw water line along CR 116 for municipal water supply. Provide 20-foot easement along CR30 for future raw water supply from the west. Water Resources City stormwater guidelines will be utilized (see Appendix C) that cover modeling and drainage items. These guidelines will be updated with the 2023 Engineering Standards update prior to final plat approval. A City stormwater area charge may be in place prior to final plat. Modeling and grading plan will be reviewed with the preliminary plat process and strategies for mitigation of offsite volume or conveyance impacts will be determined. Hope Development will be required to provide on-site stormwater management for offsite road improvements, where feasible. Draintile information shall be provided with existing conditions analysis of the site. FIGURE Site Plan SENIOR HOUSING "G" 56,000 S.F. 55+ HOUSING "H" 33,100 S.F. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F. PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 43,200 S.F. (3 STORIES) PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 47,000 S.F. (3 STORIES) PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "A" 43,000 S.F. PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 4 STORIES OVER 1 EXISTING POND POND AMENITY POND EXISTING CEMETERY POND 4 UNITS8 UNITS4 UNITS54 UNITS 4.33 ACRES12345678910111213141516171819202.52 ACRES 4.33 ACRES 4.48 ACRES 5.41 ACRES 3.95 ACRESO S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROAD120 UNITS 4 STORIES OVER 1 204 UNITS 184 UNITS PONDFILTRATIONPOND POND FILTRATION FILTRATION 156 UNITS POND FILTRATION POND FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FILTRATION FILTRATION PARK / PLAYGROUND 1.2 ACRES COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAY8 UNITS 8 UNITS6 UNITS 8 UNITS8 UNITS 1361953.77FND IP 249921362948.92FND IP 249921358953.22FND IP 1/2" OPEN1343951.08FND IP 1/2" OPEN TIPPEDFND IP 1/2"OPEN TIPPEDFND IP 1/2" OPENFND IPCAPPED 24992FND IPCAPPED 24992WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022FULL ACCESS INTERSECTION DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC 50.0' 50.0'50.0'50.0'REGIONAL TRAIL 120.0' ROW 10.0' PROPOSED ROW 100.0' EXISTING ROW SCALE IN FEET 0 16080 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | SCOTT FROST | 11/23/2022 1:14:21 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C3-SITE.DWG:C3.02 SITE PLAN CONCEPT W AERIALHOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN SITE PLAN CONCEPT W AERIAL C3.02 #### # APPENDIX A Sewer Comprehensive Plan System !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H City of Maple GroveCity of Rogers DuffneyDrCounty Road 10 Hillside Dr Hunt ers R d g County Road 116Schutte Farm R d H id d e n PondsDr C herry LnRobertLnC ount y Road 30 J a c k ie L n Cain RdSchutte LnEbert RdCountry Rd Pat ric k PlLilyPondLnDarrellLnOswaldFarmRdOakdaleDr Dassel Ln Stie g R d ShannonLnS c hu t t e Rd Rush Meadow Ln My st ique Dr 93rd Ave N S u n n y Hill LnBrandywine RdRush Creek SouthForkRushCreek S o u th ForkRush C reekNE-M NE-S NE-C NE-A NE-B NE-D NE-G NE-H NE-L NE-E NE-JNE-I NE-F NE-N NE-T NE-K NE-R NE-V NE-U NE-O NE-Q NE-W NE-P SE-AP SE-AQ SE-AF 15''30''8''8''30''30''15''30''30''10' '8''10''10''12''15''30''30''12''15''6''30''30''30''NE-1 NE-2 NE-3 NE-4 NE-5 NE-6 NE-7 NE-8 NE-9 NE-10 NE-11 NE-12 NE-13 (LS) NE-14 NE-15 NE-16 NE-17 NE-18 Elm Creek Interceptor NE-19 NE-20 NE-21 NE-22 NE-23 456710 456730 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,500 0 1,500750 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\NE Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer_LS.mxd Date: 1/8/2019 Time: 7:15:58 AM User: ShuJC0243!Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Proposed Forcemain !H Sewer Nodes (LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-2Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - NE District 115 SENIOR HOUSING "G" 56,000 S.F. 55+ HOUSING "H" 33,100 S.F. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F. PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 43,200 S.F. (3 STORIES) PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 47,000 S.F. (3 STORIES) PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "A" 43,000 S.F. PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 4 STORIES OVER 1 EXISTING POND POND AMENITY POND EXISTING CEMETERY POND 4 UNITS8 UNITS4 UNITS54 UNITS 4.33 ACRES12345678910111213141516171819202.52 ACRES 4.33 ACRES 4.48 ACRES 5.41 ACRES 3.95 ACRESO S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROAD120 UNITS 4 STORIES OVER 1 204 UNITS 184 UNITS PONDFILTRATIONPOND POND FILTRATION FILTRATION 156 UNITS POND FILTRATION POND FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FILTRATION FILTRATION PARK / PLAYGROUND 1.2 ACRES COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAY8 UNITS 8 UNITS6 UNITS 8 UNITS8 UNITS 1361953.77FND IP 249921362948.92FND IP 249921358953.22FND IP 1/2" OPEN1343951.08FND IP 1/2" OPEN TIPPEDFND IP 1/2"OPEN TIPPEDFND IP 1/2" OPENFND IPCAPPED 24992FND IPCAPPED 24992WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022FULL ACCESS INTERSECTION DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC 50.0' 50.0'50.0'50.0'REGIONAL TRAIL 120.0' ROW 10.0' PROPOSED ROW 100.0' EXISTING ROW SCALE IN FEET 0 16080 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | SCOTT FROST | 11/23/2022 1:14:21 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C3-SITE.DWG:C3.02 SITE PLAN CONCEPT W AERIALHOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN SITE PLAN CONCEPT W AERIAL C3.02 #### # Trunk Inverts from Comprehensive Plan 159 APPENDIX B NE Water System !O !O !O #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake 456710 R u s h C reekRushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek SouthForkR u sh C r eek2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Trunk Water System.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:36:40 PM User: ShuJC0243 Existing WatermainProposed Watermain !O Potential Water Tower Locations #*Existing Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #*Proposed Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #* Emergency Connection withNeighboring Communities(Normally Closed) #*Potential Water Storage #*Potential Booster StationPotential Future Well Exploration AreasMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 9-2Trunk Water System 137 Water Modeling Results Table 1 Water Model Results Scenario 1 - Tower On, Maple Grove Off Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi)Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi)Fire Flow (Available) (gpm)Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Maple Grove 942 0 1,105 70.5 0 1,100 68.2 3,073 0 1,099 67.7 J-95 943 3.6 1,105 70.1 10.8 1,100 67.7 3,175 21.6 1,099 67.3 J-96 945 1.6 1,105 69.2 4.8 1,100 66.9 4,251 9.6 1,099 66.4 J-100 941 0 1,105 70.9 0 1,100 68.6 4,791 0 1,099 68.2 J-101 947 0 1,105 68.3 0 1,100 66.1 5,000 0 1,099 65.8 J-102 953 4.8 1,105 65.7 14.4 1,100 63.5 5,000 28.8 1,099 63.2 J-94 952 3.4 1,105 66.2 10.2 1,100 63.9 3,073 20.4 1,099 63.4 J-103 946 1.4 1,105 68.8 4.2 1,100 66.5 3,175 8.4 1,099 66 J-158 943 4.2 1,105 70.1 12.6 1,100 67.8 5,000 25.2 1,099 67.5 J-182 930 0 1,105 75.7 0 1,100 73.5 5,000 0 1,099 73.3 J-183 940 0 1,105 71.4 0 1,100 69.2 5,000 0 1,099 69 J-185 941 3.4 1,105 70.9 10.2 1,100 68.7 5,000 20.4 1,099 68.3 J-186 927 3 1,105 77 9 1,100 74.7 5,000 18 1,099 74.4 J-187 926 0 1,105 77.4 0 1,100 75.1 5,000 0 1,099 74.7 J-188 940 0 1,105 71.4 0 1,100 69.1 4,924 0 1,099 68.7 J-189 946 4.2 1,105 68.8 12.6 1,100 66.5 4,208 25.2 1,099 66 J-190 944 2.8 1,105 69.6 8.4 1,100 67.3 4,970 16.8 1,099 66.9 J-191 947 5.2 1,105 68.3 15.6 1,100 66 4,375 31.2 1,099 65.6 J-192 946 3.2 1,105 68.8 9.6 1,100 66.5 4,701 19.2 1,099 66 J-245 945 4.2 1,105 69.2 12.6 1,100 66.9 2,178 25.2 1,099 66.4 J-246 938 0 1,105 72.2 0 1,100 69.9 1,772 0 1,099 69.5 J-247 942 1.8 1,105 70.5 5.4 1,100 68.2 3,336 10.8 1,099 67.7 J-248 950 3.2 1,105 67 9.6 1,100 64.7 3,097 19.2 1,099 64.3 J-249 945.5 2.2 1,105 69 6.6 1,100 66.7 3,472 13.2 1,099 66.2 J-254 950 0 1,105 67.1 0 1,100 64.8 5,000 0 1,100 64.7 J-261 946 22.1 1,105 68.8 66.2 1,100 66.5 2,562 132.4 1,099 66.2 J-262 952 8.6 1,105 66.2 25.8 1,100 64 3,255 51.6 1,099 63.8 J-263 950.3 56.8 1,105 66.9 170.4 1,100 64.7 5,000 340.8 1,100 64.6 J-264 952 25.8 1,105 66.2 77.5 1,100 64 5,000 155.1 1,100 64 J-265 952.2 9.2 1,105 66.1 27.6 1,100 63.9 5,000 51.6 1,100 63.8 J-267 953 0 1,105 65.8 0 1,100 63.6 5,000 0 1,100 63.6 J-271 943 5 1,105 70.1 15 1,100 67.8 3,825 30 1,099 67.3 J-272 943 4.4 1,105 70.1 13.2 1,100 67.8 3,963 26.4 1,099 67.3 J-273 944 3.8 1,105 69.6 11.4 1,100 67.3 4,106 22.8 1,099 66.9 J-274 945 3 1,105 69.2 9 1,100 66.9 5,000 18 1,099 66.5 J-275 946 3.8 1,105 68.8 11.4 1,100 66.5 4,658 22.8 1,099 66.1 J-276 942 0 1,105 70.5 0 1,100 68.2 4,783 0 1,099 67.8 J-277 944 2.2 1,105 69.6 6.6 1,100 67.3 2,979 13.2 1,099 66.9 J-278 943 0 1,105 70.1 0 1,100 67.8 4,324 0 1,099 67.4 J-279 947 2 1,105 68.3 6 1,100 66 3,191 12 1,099 65.7 J-280 940 0 1,105 71.4 0 1,100 69.1 4,473 0 1,099 68.7 J-281 945 3.6 1,105 69.2 10.8 1,100 66.9 5,000 21.6 1,099 66.6 J-282 935 2.6 1,105 73.5 7.8 1,100 71.3 3,342 15.6 1,099 71 J-283 932 0 1,105 74.8 0 1,100 72.5 5,000 0 1,099 72.2 J-284 938 5 1,105 72.2 15 1,100 69.9 4,497 30 1,099 69.5 J-285 944 4.6 1,105 69.6 13.8 1,100 67.4 5,000 27.6 1,099 67.1 J-286 953 3.2 1,105 65.7 9.6 1,100 63.5 5,000 19.2 1,099 63.2 J-287 950 2.8 1,105 67 8.4 1,100 64.8 2,731 16.8 1,099 64.5 Average Day Demand Maximum Day Demand Peak Hour Demand Node Label Elevation (ft) Table 2 Water Model Results Scenario 2 - Tower Off, Maple Grove On Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi)Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi)Fire Flow (Available) (gpm)Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Maple Grove 942 0 1,093 65.3 0 1,092 65 5,000 0 1,090 64.2 J-95 943 3.6 1,093 64.8 10.8 1,092 64.3 5,000 21.6 1,088 62.8 J-96 945 1.6 1,093 63.8 4.8 1,090 62.6 3,190 9.6 1,081 59 J-100 941 0 1,093 65.5 0 1,089 64.1 2,775 0 1,079 59.9 J-101 947 0 1,092 62.9 0 1,088 61.1 2,382 0 1,076 55.8 J-102 953 4.8 1,092 60.3 14.4 1,088 58.5 2,342 28.8 1,076 53.2 J-94 952 3.4 1,093 60.9 10.2 1,092 60.6 5,000 20.4 1,089 59.4 J-103 946 1.4 1,093 63.5 4.2 1,092 63 5,000 8.4 1,088 61.5 J-158 943 4.2 1,092 64.6 12.6 1,088 62.8 2,292 25.2 1,076 57.5 J-182 930 0 1,092 70.2 0 1,088 68.4 2,281 0 1,075 62.9 J-183 940 0 1,092 65.9 0 1,088 64.1 2,274 0 1,075 58.6 J-185 941 3.4 1,092 65.5 10.2 1,088 63.8 2,445 20.4 1,076 58.6 J-186 927 3 1,092 71.6 9 1,089 69.9 2,521 18 1,077 64.9 J-187 926 0 1,092 72 0 1,089 70.5 2,650 0 1,078 65.9 J-188 940 0 1,092 66 0 1,089 64.5 2,731 0 1,079 60.2 J-189 946 4.2 1,093 63.4 12.6 1,090 62.2 3,251 25.2 1,081 58.6 J-190 944 2.8 1,092 64.2 8.4 1,089 62.6 2,613 16.8 1,078 57.8 J-191 947 5.2 1,092 62.9 15.6 1,089 61.3 2,473 31.2 1,077 56.5 J-192 946 3.2 1,092 63.4 9.6 1,089 61.8 2,700 19.2 1,078 57.3 J-245 945 4.2 1,093 63.8 12.6 1,090 62.6 1,886 25.2 1,081 59 J-246 938 0 1,093 66.9 0 1,090 65.7 1,578 0 1,081 62 J-247 942 1.8 1,093 65.2 5.4 1,091 64.6 4,824 10.8 1,087 62.6 J-248 950 3.2 1,093 61.8 9.6 1,091 61 3,910 19.2 1,086 58.9 J-249 945.5 2.2 1,093 63.7 6.6 1,091 62.9 4,350 13.2 1,086 60.6 J-254 950 0 1,092 61.6 0 1,088 59.7 2,264 0 1,075 54.2 J-261 946 22.1 1,092 63.3 66.2 1,088 61.4 1,582 132.4 1,075 55.7 J-262 952 8.6 1,092 60.7 25.8 1,088 58.9 1,732 51.6 1,075 53.3 J-263 950.3 56.8 1,092 61.5 170.4 1,088 59.6 2,258 340.8 1,075 54.1 J-264 952 25.8 1,092 60.7 77.5 1,088 58.9 2,233 155.1 1,075 53.3 J-265 952.2 9.2 1,092 60.6 27.6 1,088 58.8 2,243 51.6 1,075 53.2 J-267 953 0 1,092 60.3 0 1,088 58.4 2,223 0 1,075 52.9 J-271 943 5 1,093 64.7 15 1,090 63.7 3,647 30 1,083 60.7 J-272 943 4.4 1,092 64.7 13.2 1,089 63.1 2,460 26.4 1,078 58.4 J-273 944 3.8 1,092 64.2 11.4 1,089 62.6 2,448 22.8 1,077 57.8 J-274 945 3 1,092 63.8 9 1,089 62.1 2,524 18 1,077 57.1 J-275 946 3.8 1,092 63.3 11.4 1,088 61.6 2,344 22.8 1,077 56.5 J-276 942 0 1,092 65.1 0 1,089 63.4 2,443 0 1,077 58.3 J-277 944 2.2 1,092 64.2 6.6 1,089 62.5 1,967 13.2 1,077 57.5 J-278 943 0 1,092 64.6 0 1,088 62.9 2,298 0 1,077 57.9 J-279 947 2 1,092 62.9 6 1,088 61.2 2,000 12 1,077 56.1 J-280 940 0 1,092 65.9 0 1,088 64.2 2,358 0 1,077 59.1 J-281 945 3.6 1,092 63.8 10.8 1,088 62 2,411 21.6 1,076 56.7 J-282 935 2.6 1,092 68.1 7.8 1,088 66.3 2,029 15.6 1,076 61.1 J-283 932 0 1,092 69.4 0 1,089 67.8 2,579 0 1,078 63 J-284 938 5 1,092 66.8 15 1,089 65.2 2,526 30 1,077 60.2 J-285 944 4.6 1,092 64.2 13.8 1,088 62.4 2,377 27.6 1,076 57.1 J-286 953 3.2 1,092 60.3 9.6 1,088 58.5 2,296 19.2 1,076 53.2 J-287 950 2.8 1,092 61.6 8.4 1,088 59.8 1,712 16.8 1,076 54.5 Average Day Demand Maximum Day Demand Peak Hour Demand Node Label Elevation (ft) Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Wright County VVPTW !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(CR-116H u n t e r s Rdg H illside Dr Brockton La NAlvaradoLaNDarrel La Dassel La OswaldFarmRdSti e g R d 97th Ave N CityofCorcoranCityofMapleGroveNortheast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP Maple Grove J-95 J-96 J-100 J-101 J-102 J-94J-103 J-158 J-182J-183 J-185 J-186 J-187 J-188 J-189J-190 J-191 J-192 J-245 J-246 J-247 J-248 J-249 J-254J-261 J-262 J-263 J-264 J-265 J-267 J-271 J-272 J-273 J-274 J-275 J-276 J-277J-278 J-279J-280 J-281 J-282 J-283 J-284 J-285 J-286 J-287 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadfigures\watercadfigures.aprx Revised: 2023-03-30 By: bschafermeyerLegend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries Hope Community Church Development Location Water System FacilityVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank !(Junction Water Main Diameter 8 Inch 12 Inch 16 Inch 20 Inch 24 Inch Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Imagery (At original document size of 11x17) 1:7,200 0 300 600 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-30 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran Hope Church Development Pipe Network 1 Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Wright County VVPTW !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(CR-116H unters Rdg H illside Dr Brockton La NAlvaradoLaNDarrel La Dassel La OswaldFarmRdStiegRd 97th Ave N CityofCorcoranCityofMapleGroveNortheast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP 70.5 PSI 70.1 PSI 69.2 PSI 70.9 PSI 68.3 PSI 65.7 PSI 66.2 PSI68.8 PSI 70.1 PSI 75.7 PSI 71.4 PSI 70.9 PSI 77 PSI 77.4 PSI 71.4 PSI 68.8 PSI69.6 PSI 68.3 PSI 68.8 PSI 69.2 PSI 72.2 PSI 70.5 PSI 67 PSI 69 PSI 67.1 PSI68.8 PSI 66.2 PSI 66.9 PSI 66.2 PSI 66.1 PSI 65.8 PSI 70.1 PSI 70.1 PSI 69.6 PSI 69.2 PSI 68.8 PSI 70.5 PSI 69.6 PSI70.1 PSI 68.3 PSI71.4 PSI69.2 PSI 73.5 PSI 74.8 PSI 72.2 PSI 69.6 PSI 65.7 PSI 67 PSI Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadfigures\watercadfigures.aprx Revised: 2023-03-30 By: bschafermeyerLegend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries Hope Community Church Development Location Water System FacilityVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Water System Pressure !(< 35 PSI !(35-50 PSI !(50-65 PSI !(65-80 PSI !(80-95 PSI !(>95 PSI Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Imagery (At original document size of 11x17) 1:7,200 0 300 600 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-30 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran Hope Church Development Average Day Water Distribution System Pressure: Tower On 2 System Conditions: Average day demand: 0.48 MGD Storage Tank: 5 ft below overflow WTP high service pump off Maple grove connection: OFF 0.32 Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Wright County VVPTW !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(CR-116H unters Rdg H illside Dr Brockton La NAlvaradoLaNDarrel La Dassel La OswaldFarmRdStiegRd 97th Ave N CityofCorcoranCityofMapleGroveNortheast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP 3072.6 GPM 3174.5 GPM 4250.8 GPM 4791 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 3072.6 GPM3174.5 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 4924.4 GPM 4208.3 GPM4969.5 GPM 4375.3 GPM 4700.6 GPM 2177.8 GPM 1772.4 GPM 3336.1 GPM 3096.7 GPM 3472 GPM 5000 GPM2562.4 GPM 3254.8 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 3824.9 GPM 3962.6 GPM 4105.8 GPM 5000 GPM 4658.3 GPM 4783.1 GPM 2979.1 GPM4324.1 GPM 3190.6 GPM 4472.8 GPM 5000 GPM 3342.2 GPM 5000 GPM 4497.1 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 2731 GPM Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadfigures\watercadfigures.aprx Revised: 2023-03-30 By: bschafermeyerLegend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries Hope Community Church Development Location Water System FacilityVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Available Fire Flow !(500-1,000 GPM !(1,000-2,500 GPM !(2,500-3,500 GPM !(> 3,500 GPM Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Imagery (At original document size of 11x17) 1:7,200 0 300 600 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-30 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran Hope Church Development Maximum Day Available Fire Flow: Tower On 3 System Conditions: Maximum day demand: 1.44 MGD Storage Tank: 10 ft below overflow WTP high service pump off Maple grove connection: OFF 0.95 Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Wright County VVPTW !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(CR-116H unters Rdg H illside Dr Brockton La NAlvaradoLaNDarrel La Dassel La OswaldFarmRdStiegRd 97th Ave N CityofCorcoranCityofMapleGroveNortheast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP 65.3 PSI 64.8 PSI 63.8 PSI 65.5 PSI 62.9 PSI 60.3 PSI 60.9 PSI63.5 PSI 64.6 PSI 70.2 PSI 65.9 PSI 65.5 PSI 71.6 PSI 72 PSI 66 PSI 63.4 PSI64.2 PSI 62.9 PSI 63.4 PSI 63.8 PSI 66.9 PSI 65.2 PSI 61.8 PSI 63.7 PSI 61.6 PSI63.3 PSI 60.7 PSI 61.5 PSI 60.7 PSI 60.6 PSI 60.3 PSI 64.7 PSI 64.7 PSI 64.2 PSI 63.8 PSI 63.3 PSI 65.1 PSI 64.2 PSI64.6 PSI 62.9 PSI65.9 PSI63.8 PSI 68.1 PSI 69.4 PSI 66.8 PSI 64.2 PSI 60.3 PSI 61.6 PSI Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadfigures\watercadfigures.aprx Revised: 2023-03-30 By: bschafermeyerLegend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries Hope Community Church Development Location Water System FacilityVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Water System Pressure !(<35 PSI !(35-50 PSI !(50-65 PSI !(65-80 PSI !(80-95 PSI !(>95 PSI Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Imagery (At original document size of 11x17) 1:7,200 0 300 600 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-30 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran Hope Church Development Average Day Water Distribution System Pressure: Maple Grove On 4 System Conditions: Average day demand: 0.48 MGD Storage Tank: OFFLINE WTP high service pump off Maple grove connection: ON 0.32 Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Wright County VVPTW !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(CR-116H unters Rdg H illside Dr Brockton La NAlvaradoLaNDarrel La Dassel La OswaldFarmRdStiegRd 97th Ave N CityofCorcoranCityofMapleGroveNortheast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 3190.3 GPM 2775.3 GPM 2382.4 GPM 2342 GPM 5000 GPM5000 GPM 2291.5 GPM 2280.6 GPM 2274.2 GPM 2444.5 GPM 2520.7 GPM 2649.6 GPM 2730.9 GPM 3250.9 GPM2612.5 GPM 2472.6 GPM 2700.2 GPM 1886.3 GPM 1577.9 GPM 4824.2 GPM 3910.2 GPM 4349.7 GPM 2264.1 GPM1582.3 GPM 1731.6 GPM 2258 GPM 2232.5 GPM 2243 GPM 2222.8 GPM 3647.4 GPM 2459.5 GPM 2447.5 GPM 2524.2 GPM 2343.9 GPM 2442.8 GPM 1966.7 GPM2297.7 GPM 2000.3 GPM 2357.7 GPM 2411.2 GPM 2028.7 GPM 2579.1 GPM 2526 GPM 2377 GPM 2295.6 GPM 1711.6 GPM Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadfigures\watercadfigures.aprx Revised: 2023-03-30 By: bschafermeyerLegend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries Hope Community Church Development Location Water System FacilityVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Available Fire Flow !(500-1,000 GPM !(1,000-2,500 GPM !(2,500-3,500 GPM !(> 3,500 GPM Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Imagery (At original document size of 11x17) 1:7,200 0 300 600 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-30 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran Hope Church Development Maximum Day Available Fire Flow: Maple Grove On 5 System Conditions: Maximum day demand: 1.44 MGD Storage Tank: OFFLINE WTP high service pump off Maple grove connection: ON 0.95 Well Locations from NE Water Feasibility 2021 Feasibility Report Supplements 2020 Northeast Water System June 4, 2021 Prepared for: City of Corcoran Figure 1 Geologic Map with Planned and Potential Municipal Well Locations APPENDIX C Stormwater Modeling Guidelines Floodplain City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake 456710 R u s h C reekRushCreek SouthForkRu s h C r e e k SouthForkRushCree k 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: V:\2277\resource\gis\Corcoran\Pro\Comp_Plan\Comp_Plan.aprx Date: 2023-03-27 Time: 9:12 AM User: kberglund City ofCORCORAN Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Floodway 100 Year Floodplain A AE 500 Year Floodplain 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD Map App C-1 Floodplain Stormwater Modeling Guidelines Stormwater Guidelines for Development March 2019 Issue Cities changing from rural to urban development are challenged by the additional stormwater generated due to construction of impervious surfaces, along with the offsite infrastructure, or lack thereof, to manage effectively. To standardize the modeling and review process, the guidelines below were created for efficiency. Note: A watershed approval is required per Elm Creek WMO rules, which also reviews flow rates, water quality and volume management. Modeling Watershed Information · Provide an aerial photo of the development that includes the overall watershed and subwatershed boundaries · Provide a summary of the acreage to each discharge point leaving the site. Any increase (or decrease) shall be identified. · Show any floodplain adjacent to project or within the project · Show downstream water bodies and flow paths o Downstream flow paths and water bodies typically need to have elevations, inverts, and condition identified. Subwatersheds A HydroCAD model (typically used) has inputs that can vary by user. To minimize resubmittals, review time and effort, the following data shall be utilized. · Electronic model shall be submitted · Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) shall be lowered one category due to the mass grading and compaction of the soils. For example, an existing B soil, shall be modeled as a proposed C soil (unless it remains undisturbed) · Wetlands, filtration basins, and ponds shall be modeled at CN of 98 · Identify peak rates for storm events and proposed shall be equal or less than existing rates. o Note: There are certain conditions where at City’s discretion the off-site conditions require a reduction in flow rate from existing rates. · SWMM (i.e. EPA-, XP-, or PC-) models can be submitted for review, however these increase review time. Model Setup for Outlet Control Structures, NWLs and Infiltration · The model’s flow control structures (OCS, culverts, etc.) shall match the construction plan information. During the plan and model review both may be modified and revised · Individual detail plates are required for each OCS, and individual plates shall have inverts identified · A pond or wetland NWL (and model starting elevation) shall be set at the constructed outlet control elevation. o No live storage shall be utilized below the controlling OCS elevation. o No live storage shall be used for filtration shelves on ponds below controlling OCS elevation · If a pond or wetland has an NWL (wet surface), infiltration shall not be used in flood routing. · If a pond has filtration BMP causing drawdown below the NWL, this drawdown elevation shall not be used as the NWL for flood routing. (Filtration has a slower release time and during wet periods is not available as live storage). Construction Plans Catch Basins · Street drainage shall be sufficient to manage the 10-year event · Typical a CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly · Three inches (0.25 feet) of head on a CB will inundate a street centerline (2% slope). · Spacing is 200 to 250 feet using longitudinal street dimensions of 40 feet from road centerline to half the house footprint (assumes rear half of house drains to rear yard). Dimensions equal 10,000 SF. · CBs may be required on both sides of ped ramps to capture flows Natural Drainage Features · Waterbodies receiving urban drainage (wetlands, ditches, gullies) may need to have OCS installed, erosion protection, or reduced flow rates to allow the feature to function over the long term due to more consistent flows from increased impervious via development · Offsite work may be necessary and City will assist with coordination, easements, etc. HWLs and EOFs · The freeboard requirements are: o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the HWL o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the EOF · EOFs shall be accurately shown and as builts are required. The highest point shall be the EOF (for example top of curb) since this is the controlling elevation o In certain instances, channel calculations of the swale may be required to show the EOF has capacity to manage estimated flow · Overland EOFs are preferred, however if a second pipe serves as an EOF then modeling will include a 100-year event using the second pipe (EOF) as the only outlet (primary outlet plugged). Rear Yards · Rear yards or swales less than 2% shall have draintile. Typically, every two to three lots will require rear yard CBs. Sump Connections · Houses adjoining a wetland or pond do not need individual sump connection · Others will have access to rear yard stormsewer. Offsite Impacts Adjacent Parcels · City will review adjacent parcels (downstream and upstream) for impacts from volume, point discharge, etc. and may require off site improvements. City will assist in coordination of any off site work. · Off site water quality improvement projects may be determined by the City for assistance with compliance with City’s TMDL approach of implementing improvements upon development. · FEMA modifications may be necessary due to development and implemented by City. Page 1 of 10 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 8b. City Council Meeting February 22, 2024 Prepared By Kendra Lindahl, AICP Topic Sketch Plan for “610 Extension Business Park” at 19510 County Road 30 (PID 12-119-23-23-0001) (city file no. 24- 003) Action Required Review and Comment Review Deadline: April 7, 2024 1. Request United Properties has submitted a request for review of a sketch plan for a business park on the Oswald property at 19510 County Road 30. The applicant has submitted two different concepts and asks for Council feedback. 2.Context Zoning and Land Use The 76.89-acre site is guided Business Park in the Comprehensive Plan and zoned Business Park (B-P). This is the only parcel of land guided Business Park in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The land is currently farmed. The site is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) in phase I of the sewer staging plan. The site is also subject to the Northeast District Design Guidelines. Surrounding Properties All surrounding properties are located within the MUSA and Northeast District. The properties to the north are guided Existing Residential and Low Density Residential (Bellwether) and zoned Urban Reserve (UR) and Planned Unit Development (PUD). Properties to the east are guided Mixed Use and zoned General Mixed Use (GMU). Properties to the south, across County Road 30, are guided Mixed Use and zoned UR district. Properties to the west are guided Mixed Use, zoned GMU and a development application for Hope Community is in process. Figure 1- Northeast District Plan Page 2 of 10 Natural Characteristics of the Site The Natural Resources Inventory (NRI) map identifies a disturbed woodland in the northeast portion of the site. The Parks and Trails map shows that same area as part of the Greenway Corridor. There are no wetlands shown on the property, but a notice of determination will be required. 3. Analysis Concept Plan The application includes two different concepts: a. Concept 1 includes four large buildings totaling 1,017,500 square feet and b. Concept 2 includes seven buildings totaling 864,000 square feet. Concept 1 Concept 2 Both concepts include truck docks and use stormwater ponding and public plazas on the north to buffer the buildings from the homes on the north. The applicant intends to apply for approval of a business park development under standard zoning. “The intent of this district is to provide for the establishment of campus developments with a variety of office, low-impact manufacturing or assembly of a variety of products that create no exterior noise, glare or fumes. Uses allowed in this district are limited to those that are compatible with lower intensity residential and business uses and which have limited amounts of outside storage. Developments in this district will provide a number of amenities, including architectural controls, landscaping, preservation of natural features, etc. New development within this district will be allowed only when a full range of municipal services and facilities are available to serve the area.” Page 3 of 10 The Business Park district allows laboratories/research facilities, office, office/warehouse, wholesale showrooms and warehousing and indoor storage used in conjunction with offices or manufacturing facilities. Warehousing/distribution and indoor storage as a principal use is not permitted in the BP district. Warehousing/distribution is not defined in the City Code, but the NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) code for general warehousing and storage is 493110 and describes it as “This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in operating merchandise warehousing and storage facilities. These establishments generally handle goods in containers, such as boxes, barrels, and/or drums, using equipment, such as forklifts, pallets, and racks. They are not specialized in handling bulk products of any particular type, size, or quantity of goods or products.” The City would need to continue to work with the developer to ensure that the ultimate users would confirm to the BP district standards. It is possible that some potential tenants would fall into the Light Industrial zoning classification and would not be permitted in this project. Lot Standards and Building Setbacks The property will be required to be platted to accommodate new public streets, but no internal lot lines are shown on the plans. The lots would need to comply with the BP district standards shown in the table below: Required Minimum lot area 1 acre Minimum lot width 100 ft. Minimum lot depth 200 ft. Setbacks Front, from major roadways 100 ft. Front, from all other streets 50 ft. Side 20 ft. Rear 20 ft. Adjacent to residential 50 ft. Maximum Principal Building Height 45 ft. Maximum impervious surface coverage** 70% The buildings appear to comply with the minimum setback requirements from front lot lines, but internal lot lines are not shown on the concept plan. A variance will be requested to allow a zero setback for internal parking and loading areas and this is discussed in the parking section of the staff report. Parking and Drive Aisles Section 1060.060 requires that parking and drive aisles must be setback 100 ft. from County Road 116 and County Road 30, 50 feet from new public streets and 10 ft. from the side and rear property lines. The applicant is proposing a 50 ft. front setback for Page 4 of 10 parking and drive aisles along the County roads. A parking setback reduction from 100 feet to 50 feet along County roads is permitted by right by Section 1060.070, Subd. 2.L. if additional landscaping is provided. The applicant will likely create a lot for each of the buildings and request a zero setback for shared parking, loading or drive aisles (depending on which concept comes forward). This will require a variance. • This type of zero setback in a business park is common (and is allowed in the GMU district), but the Council should provide feedback on the potential variance. • In lieu of the variance, the applicant could request an ordinance amendment to allow a zero setback for developments such as this. Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes the minimum number of parking spaces required based on the gross sq. ft. of floor area for each land use. End users have not yet been identified but the applicant will need to make some assumptions about users with the preliminary plat application to ensure adequate parking is provided. The Northeast District standards include additional parking requirements: • Bike racks are required to be provided. • Parking bays shall have landscape islands at each end of the parking bay and bays in excess of 15 spaces in length shall be divided by intermediate islands. Trees are required in these islands. End island must be at least 360 square feet of area and Intermediate landscape islands shall provide at least 180 square feet of planting area. • A landscape buffer shall be provided between all parking areas and the public sidewalk. The buffer shall consist of shade trees, low shrubs or perennial flowers and a decorative fence or masonry wall. Plantings and parking lot screen walls or fences shall be no less than three feet and no more than four feet in height to allow views into and out of parking areas. It does not appear that the concept plans comply with these standards. The plans would need to show compliance as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Landscaping No landscaping is depicted on the concept plan. The Northeast District Guidelines recommend site layout and landscaping should be designed to work with the existing topography of the area, wooded areas, wetlands and natural viewsheds and corridors. Landscaping in the Northeast District must be selected from a list of approved landscape materials. The site is subject to the landscape standards in Section 1060.070 which requires the following: - One overstory tree per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross building floor area or one tree per 50 lineal ft. of site perimeter, whichever is greater. Page 5 of 10 - One understory shrub for each 300 sq. ft. of building or one tree per 30 lineal ft. of site perimeter, whichever is greater. - The planting screen shall consist of hardy trees that will provide a minimum of 80% opacity year-round. Planting screens shall contain a mix of overstory and understory planting and a mix of deciduous and coniferous materials. The proposed Concept 1 would be required to plant approximately 1,018 overstory trees and 3,391 shrubs, based on the gross building floor area for the development (Concept 2 would require about 20% less). We do not have a subdivision plan with which to determine whether the requirement for trees is greatest based on building sq. ft. or site perimeter. The amount of development proposed could make placement of required landscaping difficult, especially on lots with little open space to accommodate plant material. Section 1060.060 requires that parking areas with four or more stalls shall be screened from properties guided or zoned residential and from public streets. Screening to a height of at least three ft. shall be provided to screen vehicle headlights. Section 1060.060, Subd. 3(B.9) of the Zoning Ordinance prohibit off-street loading areas within 300 ft. of residentially zoned or guided property unless they are screened by an intervening building. Loading areas not requiring screening by an intervening building shall be screened from adjacent residentially zoned or guided property by the use of berms, fences, or walls to provide 100% opacity to a height of at least 10 ft. The Northeast District guidelines take these standards a step further and require Loading docks or overhead doors shall be oriented away from County Roads or residential property wherever reasonable, as determined by the City. If not reasonable and the loading docks or overhead doors are visible from County Roads or residential property, they shall be screened to 80% opacity year-round consistent with Section 1060.070 Subd. 2(J) of the City Code. • Concept 1 shows the buildings slightly more than 300 feet from the residential property to the north and the loading areas are fully screened by the building. This concept complies with both the Section 1060 and Northeast District requirements. • Concept 2 also shows the buildings slightly more than 300 feet from the residential property to the north. The loading areas are not screened from by a building, and it is unclear how the required screening will be accomplished. Landscaping and berming will likely be difficult given the location of the ponding areas, so wing walls will likely be required to screen these loading docks from residential properties. Page 6 of 10 Buffer Yard In addition to the landscaping requirements noted above, Section 1060.070, Subd. 2.J.1 requires buffer yards to be provided in perpetuity. The code requires the developer to provide a Buffer Yard D on the north and south property lines because the adjacent properties to the north are zoned Urban Reserve and PUD and the properties to the south are zoned Urban Reserve. However, the code allows the Council to waive the buffer requirement when the properties are separated by a major roadway. • Council has the discretion to waive the buffer requirement on the south property line because the adjacent properties are separated by County Road 30. Staff believes this waiver is appropriate. Furthermore, the amount of landscaping required on site will already necessitate significant landscaping in this area. Stormwater ponds and bio-retention ponds are allowed in perimeter setbacks. They are allowed to encroach a maximum of 10 feet into required buffer yards. The buffer yard and ponding on the north must be evaluated to comply with City standards. Easements shall be required over the buffer yard to protect in perpetuity. Access/Streets The Northeast District was developed in conjunction with and using funds from Hennepin County. The location of the accesses onto County roads was conceptually approved by Hennepin County as part of that plan, but Hennepin County will review those access points as part of a formal development application. The street plan developed shows four public street access points to this site The concept plans show only three of these connections. The planned public street access onto County Road 116 has been eliminated from these concepts and a private drive shown in that location. The north-south connection between County Road 30 and Bellwether is shown on the plans but is offset as contemplated to discourage cut-through traffic. Bellwether residents spoke at the Council meeting on February 8th requesting additional accesses in and out of the development and should this project proceed, it would complete one of these planned connections. The plans show a private drive access onto County Road 116. The Northeast District plans shows this as a right-in/right-out access, but Hennepin County would have permitting authority over this access. The current location is approximately 300 feet west of where spacing guidelines would require it to be located. A new public street Page 7 of 10 would extend from the north-south road north of the buildings to the east property line for a future connection. The plans show a 30-foot wide street in a 60 ft. right-of-way for these new public streets. This is consistent with the Northeast District standards. The attached engineer’s memo provides additional comments on this plan. A feasibility study would be completed in conjunction with the environmental review for the site. This would include a full traffic study. Buildings/Architecture The applicant has not provided any architectural details for the proposed buildings but has provided some conceptual renderings for concept 1. Building design must comply with Section 1060.050, Subd. 1(C) which provides standards for buildings in non- residential zoning districts. Additionally, the applicant must comply with the Northeast District standards for materials and be designed to break up long elevations. Page 8 of 10 Utilities The site is located within the MUSA boundary and will be served by sewer and water. The applicant will be responsible for extending utilities to serve the site. These requirements will be further evaluated as part of the feasibility study. Stormwater The applicant has proposed thee stormwater ponds on the north side of the site. As part of the development review plan, the applicant would be required to comply with state, watershed and local stormwater standards. The Northeast District guidelines describe a mix of ponds, fountains and other water elements provide focal amenities should be employed within a framework of an environmentally responsible and visually pleasing strategy to manage stormwater. A stormwater management plan shall be provided by the applicant to confirm the proposed stormwater facilities are in accordance with the City of Corcoran and watershed standards. Parks and Trails Under the current ordinance, park dedication of land is required at 4% of the net pre- development area for Commercial and Industrial land or market equivalent in cash. Net acreage is not available at this time; 3.01 acres of park land dedication would be required based on the gross land area. Wetlands on site will impact the final park dedication area calculations (net and gross) which must be provided with final plat application. The park dedication may be a combination of land for the trail and cash to satisfy the park dedication requirements. The Parks and Trails Plan map from the Comprehensive Plan identifies a proposed off- road trail along the length of the east property line. The trail would be a part of the Three Rivers Park District Diamond Lake Regional Trail. However, the trail shown on the plan is consistent with conceptual trail realignment being discussed as part of the Hope PUD on the west side of County Road 116. As part of that project an underpass would be constructed and then trail would move to the northern boundary of this site. The applicant must work with the City and Three Rivers Park District to ensure adequate space is provided for this underpass. This alignment on the concept plan generally keeps the trail separate from the business park but accessible for employees in the park via the sidewalks that are required to be constructed on the public streets. The trail would ultimately extend north through Bellwether/Amberly developments. The trail would be 10 feet wide in a 20-foot easement. Trail design must comply with the Three Rivers Park District standards. Park dedication credit would be given for the net acreage of the easement. Page 9 of 10 Public Safety Public Safety Committee reviewed the plans and provided attached letter regarding access and fire code issues. Other Northeast District Standards In addition to the items previously discussed, the Northeast District requires all new developments to include at least three of the following resiliency options: xeriscaping, rain gardens/bio retention systems, landscaping with native species, green rooftops, aesthetic design, urban gardens, solar/wind energy or electric vehicle infrastructure. At this time, it is unclear which of these may be incorporated except that the plans do show some public plaza spaces up near the Three Rivers trail corridor. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) An EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet) is required for the warehousing or light industrial facilities that exceeds 300,000 sq. ft. An EIS is required if the facility exceeds 750,000 sq.ft. Both concepts exceed this threshold. The EIS process is similar to the EAW process that Council is familiar with but does include additional components and a longer review period. The EIS process begins with completion of an EAW and that document is used as the basis for the EIS document. The EIS is not meant to approve or deny a project, but instead act as a source of information to guide approval and permitting decisions. If the Council supports the concepts as shown by the applicant, the applicant will need to choose a concept for which the City would complete the EIS. City staff would prepare a scope of work, schedule and cost estimate for the EIS. No formal development application (preliminary plat, site plan, etc.) may be approved until the EIS process is complete. As noted earlier in this staff report, it is important the applicant provide final land use ratios to the City as the review is specific to the projected impacts based on land use. Summary The proposed uses appear to be consistent with the uses allowed in the BP district and the only variance specifically called out by the applicant is a parking setback variance internal to the site. The next steps would be: 1. Completion of the EIS 2. Application for Preliminary Plat, Variance and Site Plan Approval 3. Application for Final Plat (and Development Contract) Approval. Page 10 of 10 4. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss the sketch plan and provide the applicant with informal comments. Any opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the City Council are considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. Attachments 1. Site Location Map 2. Concept Site Plan received January 22, 2024 3. Project Renderings received January 22, 2024 4. Applicant Narrative received February 7, 2024 5. City Engineer Memo dated February 12, 2024 6. Public Safety Memo dated February 7, 2024 7. Hennepin County email dated February 1, 2024 8. Land Use Plan 9. Parks and Trails Plan Map 10. Three Rivers Park Conceptual Underpass Design Hennepin County Property Map Date: 2/12/2024 Comments: 1 inch = 800 feet PARCEL ID: 1211923230001 OWNER NAME: Kevin L Oswald/Todd E Oswald PARCEL ADDRESS: 19510 Co Rd No 30,Corcoran MN 55340 PARCEL AREA: 76.89 acres, 3,349,498 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: SALE DATE: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2022, PAYABLE 2023 PROPERTY TYPE: Farm HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $806,600 TAX TOTAL: $5,604.64 ASSESSED 2023, PAYABLE 2024 PROPERTY TYPE: Farm HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $900,100 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2024 Attachment Item: 8b1. GASGAS GAS GAS COUNTY ROAD NO. 30PUBLIC ROAD (VARIABLE WIDTHS)COUNTY ROAD NO. 116PUBLIC ROAD (80' ROW) 66.00 66.00 80.0080.0010.587.92146.32 82.61SHEET NUMBER:DATE:Phone :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax 0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: N:\0046303.00\DWG\CONCEPT\0046303EX01.DWG 01/22/2024CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL1 CORCORAN, MN CORCORANINDUSTRIALEXISTINGCONDITIONS . . . 250 NICOLLET MALL STE 500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 UNITED PROPERTIESNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION© 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'100'200'300'1" = 100'100' 20' or 10'PROJECT NUMBER: 0046303.00 ±210'PROPOSED BUILDING A±266,700 SFPROPOSED BUILDING B±332,800 SFPROPOSED BUILDING C±209,000 SFPROPOSED BUILDING D±209,000 SF±277 PARKING STALLS±292 PARKING STALLS±198 PARKING STALLS±62 TRUCK DOCKS±62 TRUCK DOCKS±85 TRUCK DOCKS±85 TRUCK DOCKS±1270'±260'±1280'±220'±950'±220'±950'±121 TRAILER STALLS60'30'26'63'26.5'60'71'55'70'60'26'63'18.5'26'63'18.5'18.5'9'26'18.5'315'26'9'63'18.5'60' LOCAL STREETRIGHT OF WAYFUTURE EXPANSION 130' RIGHT OF WAY50' LANDSCAPE BUFFER50' FRONT YARDBUILDING SETBACKSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREASTORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA60'75'PUBLIC PLAZATTTGASGAS GAS GAS POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POHCOUNTY ROAD NO. 30PUBLIC ROAD (VARIABLE WIDTHS)COUNTY ROAD NO. 116PUBLIC ROAD (80' ROW)±142 PARKING STALLS ±216 PARKING STALLS±129 PARKING STALLSSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPUBLIC PLAZAPUBLIC PLAZASHEET NUMBER:DATE:Phone :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax 0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: N:\0046303.00\DWG\CONCEPT\0046303C-CONCEPT6.DWG 01/22/2024CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL2 CORCORAN, MN CORCORANINDUSTRIALSITE EXHIBIT-CONCEPT B . . . 250 NICOLLET MALL STE 500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 UNITED PROPERTIESNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION© 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'100'200'300'1" = 100'100' 20' or 10'PROJECT NUMBER: 0046303.00TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 1,017,500 SFAttachment Item: 8b2. FUTURE EXPANSION 130' RIGHT OF WAY50' LANDSCAPE BUFFERFRONT YARDBUILDING +PARKING SETBACK XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX800'210'800'160'800'160'800'160'650'160'650'160'650'160'18.5'26'18.5'9'12'60'70'60'12'12'126'60'65'126'63'63'30'30'30'LOCAL STREETRIGHT OF WAY 30' LANDSCAPE BUFFER190'190'50'60'50'130'30'63'180'GASGAS GAS GAS COUNTY ROAD NO. 30PUBLIC ROAD (VARIABLE WIDTHS)COUNTY ROAD NO. 116PUBLIC ROAD (80' ROW)STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREASTORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPUBLIC PLAZAPROPOSED BUILDING C±128,000 SF PROPOSED BUILDING D±128,000 SF PROPOSED BUILDING E±104,000 SF ±58 TRUCK DOCKS ±58 TRUCK DOCKS ±58 TRUCK DOCKS±58 TRUCK DOCKS±277 PARKING STALLS±184 PARKING STALLS±150 PARKING STALLS ±174 PARKING STALLS ±180 PARKING STALLS ±142 PARKING STALLS ±45 TRUCK DOCKS ±45 TRUCK DOCKS±45 TRUCK DOCKSPROPOSED BUILDING F±104,000 SF PROPOSED BUILDING G±104,000 SF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED BUILDING A±168,000 SF±175 PARKING STALLS±174 PARKING STALLS±142 PARKING STALLS PUBLIC PLAZAPUBLIC PLAZAPROPOSED BUILDING B±128,000 SF SHEET NUMBER:DATE:Phone :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax 0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: N:\0046303.00\DWG\CONCEPT\0046303C-CONCEPT5.DWG 01/22/2024CORCORAN INDUSTRIAL3 CORCORAN, MN CORCORANINDUSTRIALSITE EXHIBIT-CONCEPT C2 . . . 250 NICOLLET MALL STE 500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 UNITED PROPERTIESNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION© 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'100'200'300'1" = 100'100' 20' or 10'PROJECT NUMBER: 0046303.00TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 864,000 SF Attachment Item: 8b3. Page 1 of 4 SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE 610 Extension Business Park Corcoran, Minnesota February 12, 2024 United Properties seeks to develop a Class-A business park ranging in total size from 864,000 SF- 1,017,500 SF. Per the City’s zoning map, the subject site is listed as Business Park (BP) and currently operates as a 76.89-acre farm. The site is on the northeast corner of Fletcher Lane (Highway 116) and County Road 30 (97th Avenue North). The 76.89-acre parcel has been farmed and owned by the Oswald family since the mid-1800’s. The Oswald family is the original owner of the land and purchased the land from the United States federal government. The land has operated as the home and farm for the family since their purchase. United Properties begun their relationship with the Oswald family in 2023, and shared desire to purchase the land for Business Park development. The Highway 610 extension project is a driver for United Properties’ desire to develop the site. United Properties is proposing a modernized business park which offers long-term functionality and flexibility – with operationally efficient ceiling heights, efficient space demising for multiple employers, and flexible site maneuverability and parking areas that allow for a range of businesses and employee profiles, etc. The COVID-19 pandemic caused serious uncertainty regarding the future of office space demand, and “work from home” strategies continue to threaten the outlook for space occupiers and real estate owners. Conversely over the last several years the demand for production, lab/R&D, warehousing, and distribution of goods and services within the United States has grown exponentially to meet the demand of consumers. Shipping/transportation challenges and overseas manufacturing stoppages are Attachment Item: 8b4. Page 2 of 4 leading companies to produce more product inside the United States to avoid future supply chain shocks and inefficiencies. These factors, combined with the infrastructure improvements of the Highway 610 extension project, make the proposed business park a strong offering in the Twin Cities metro. United Properties is proposing modern building design and specifications—28-32’ clear buildings that are targeted to users with flexible space needs with a wide range of job offerings. United Properties has worked with several clients in recent years who serve as examples of employers who would occupy the future 610 Extension Business Park, and are listed as follows: Cretex Medical – a surgical and medical instrument manufacturer and engineering services provider. United Properties developed their new 240,000 SF medical device headquarters project in Brooklyn Park in 2021. The office/manufacturing/warehouse is home to ~400 employees. Tesla – designer and manufacturer of electric cars, battery energy, solar panels, etc. United Properties developed a 70,400 SF headquarters for Perbix Machines in 2015, who was subsequently purchased by Tesla in 2018. The facility serves as Tesla’s primary robotics design and manufacturing business, with a mix of office, design, and engineering jobs housed in the high-tech manufacturing space, and with plans to expand their footprint in this area. Nilfisk Advance – Nilfisk is a global provider of commercial and industrial cleaning equipment. The 170,000 SF North American headquarters, developed by United Properties in 2015, contains over 300 jobs responsible for manufacturing and engineering premium cleaning products for consumers worldwide. The projects and users listed above represent just a portion of the development success that United Properties was able to achieve along Highway 610 in Brooklyn Park. Since 2015, United Properties Page 3 of 4 has developed eight buildings totaling over 1,200,000 square feet at the intersection of Highway 610 and Highway 169. These projects yield a property tax base north of $3,000,000 and an estimated 2,000 jobs. In two preliminary meetings with city staff, it was determined that the 610 Extension Business Park meets the intent of the City’s Business Park (BP) district. The purpose of the district is to “provide for the establishment of campus developments with a variety of office, low-impact manufacturing or assembly of products” and “uses allowed in this district are limited to those that are compatible with lower intensity residential and business uses, and which have limited amounts of outside storage.” Permitted uses include manufacturing or assembly which produce no exterior noise, glare, impact, etc., office, office/warehouse, and warehousing – all of which align closely with the proposed business park. Once developed, the project could pave the way for the city to offer a mix of business and employment opportunities, with positive economic impacts—jobs, tax base, housing demand, and retail demand—that permeate beyond the borders of the site. United Properties is proposing two site plans, ranging from 864,000 – 1,017,000 SF of developed space and envisions construction to be phased over several years. The reason for two plans is to offer flexibility to capitalize on changing market conditions, to effectively pursue build-to-suit corporate clients, and to plan for speculative development. The two plans represent likely development scenarios and ultimately the development may be a combination of both plans. United Properties believes that 610 Extension Business Park will be the highest quality, Class-A offering availability in the northwest Twin Cities market when developed for users like those represented above. For that reason, United Properties plans to design the new buildings to a high standard that meets the demand of prospective users while maintaining the city’s goal of “rural character” – using concrete panels, enhanced with a mix of supplementary materials – glass and Page 4 of 4 metal paneling – that offer an inspiring front door and ample natural light for the many new employees that will occupy this site in the future. Please see enclosed project renderings and building elevations that provide our design vision intent. Depending on the approval process and timeline, United Properties is considering the proposed project for construction commencement in spring of 2025. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Oswald Farm United Properties Concept Review Date: February 12th, 2024 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following document: 1.Concept Plan B and C2 – United Properties, by Westwood Professional Services Dated January 22, 2024 Comments: Two alignments of buildings are shown. Road connections and infrastructure are similar for both alignments and more detail review for the selected option will occur with the Feasibility Study. General: 1.In addition to engineering related comments, the proposed plans are subject to additional planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. 2.An encroachment agreement shall be required for all site improvements or items placed within the City ROW or easements. Plat: 1.The applicant shall have all drainage and utility easements provided and shown and all platting requirements met per the City Code. Drainage and utility easements (5’ – 10’) shall be provided along property lines, as standard per City requirements. 2.Any existing easements which conflict with the proposed plan will need to be vacated. 3.A dedicated lot shall be provided for a municipal water supply well. 4.A 65-foot half ROW dedication is shown along the County Roadways which is consistent with what Hennepin County requirements and the NE District Plan. 5.A 60-foot ROW is shown for the collector roadway through the site. This is consistent with the NE District Plan but the ROW dedications would be further reviewed with the utility plan for the site to ensure it is adequate. Additional ROW could be necessary at the connection to County Road 30 to accommodate the anticipated turn lanes for the development. Erosion Control/SWPPP 1.Preparation of and compliance with a SWPPP shall be required for construction. Transportation 1.A full Traffic Impact Study of the surrounding roadway system will be required as part of the Feasibility Study. Attachment Item: 8b5. February 2024 Oswald Farm Concept Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 3 2.All roadways shall match City standard details. 3.County has jurisdictional authority for both CR 30 and CSAH 116 access locations. The NE district plan had identified the access point to County Road 30 at approximately 1/3 of a mile spacing from County Road 116. This would require the access point to be approximately 300’ east of where it is currently shown. This will need to be reviewed with Hennepin County to determine an approved access location. 4.The access from County Road 116 was identified in the NE district plan at this general location. This is being proposed as a private access which will need to be approved by Hennepin County. 5.Temporary turnarounds meeting City standards are required at the end of dead-end streets to the east to facilitate emergency vehicle movements. 6.The access locations into the commercial sites from the City ROW shall be revised. Access locations will be reviewed to ensure that they align with one another if located across the roadway, have safe sightlines if located near curves and are adequately spaced from adjacent intersections. Site Plans 1.Street lighting locations shall be reviewed by Public Safety and final lighting locations shall be determined at the time of Final Plat. 2.The regional trail connection is shown at the proposed underpass from the adjacent proposed Hope Development. The applicant shall dedicate the necessary easements for this underpass construction, which is anticipated to be a Three Rivers directed project at a future date. 3.No internal sidewalks are shown on the site plan. It is assumed that internal sidewalk connections will be necessary within the site and to the adjacent Bellwether development. All trail/sidewalk connections should be reviewed vs the Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy. Grading /Stormwater 1.Stormwater from the site generally drains north. Any tile locations should be shown on existing conditions survey. The drainage in this area will need to be reviewed with the preliminary plat and final plat to ensure drainage from this site is managed without impacting adjacent properties. o Any offsite drainage improvements necessary to mitigate the proposed development is the developer responsibility. This will be reviewed with the Feasibility Study. 2.The majority of the existing site drains to the north with a small portion that appears to drain south across County Road 30. Conceptually the ponding is all shown along the north of the site but some BMP’s may be necessary to the south. Applicant shall ensure that downstream receiving waters (potentially wetlands) are not starved of necessary runoff. 3.A stormwater management plan shall be provided to confirm that stormwater management is in accordance with City of Corcoran and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Standards. 4.Reference the City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines for Development Review for standards for stormwater systems and modeling. 5.The wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage shall also be clearly identified and labeled. 6.All drainage swales shall maintain a minimum of 2% slope and all slopes should be 4:1 or flatter unless approved by the City Engineer. 7.If wetlands are impacted, they shall be reviewed and approved through the appropriate WCA permitting process. February 2024 Oswald Farm Concept Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 3 8.At the time of preliminary plat, the wetland buffers should be identified as either newly established wetland buffers or whether they are existing buffers as defined by City Code. Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1.Watermain stub is available at the adjacent Bellwether development and additional watermain connections may be necessary to the adjacent proposed Hope development. The water supply requirements of the development will be reviewed with the feasibility study. 2.Trunk watermain will need to be extended east/west across the development and utility stubs will need to be extended to the lot lines at a minimum. 3.Sewer will be available to southwest (proposed Hope Development) and is currently available to north east (Bellwether). End of Comments Page 1 of 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@corcoranmn.gov / Web Site – www.corcoranmn.gov Memo To: Planning (Planners Lindahl and Davis McKeown) From: Lieutenant Burns Date: February 7, 2024 Re: City File 24-003 Oswald Farm Industrial Concept Plan A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on February 7, 2024, to review the submitted industrial concept plans for the Oswald Farm site. The following were in attendance: Lieutenant Burns, Fire Chief Leuer, Fire Chief Farrens, Fire Chief Malewicki, Assistant Fire Chief Kodet, Building Official Geske, Planner Davis McKeown, and Construction Services Supervisor Pritchard. The comments below are based on the preliminary review of the plans and are intended as initial feedback; further plan review will need to be completed as construction plans are finalized. 1.If the County Road 116 driveway access is indeed a private access, it needs to be usable for emergency services. 2.Regardless of final layout, ladder trucks need to be accounted for with a 30’ drive aisle within 30’ of one side of a building. The drive aisle can be shared between two buildings. It is easier if this drive aisle is located on the car parking side instead of on the loading dock/semi-truck side. 3.Within the business park, all riser rooms need to be mirrored so they are located in the same sport for each building. Exterior access is strongly preferred. 4.Hydrant and FDC are subject to approval by the Fire Chief – Patrick Farrens. Attachment Item: 8b6. Agenda Attachment Item: 8b7. City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPion e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 10 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersRd Stieg R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h CreekRushCreek South F o rk R u sh Creek SouthForkRu shC reek6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 5/27/2029 1/22/2023 1/22/2023 5/27/2029 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 5/27/2029 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: \\MSPFSV02\DesignDepot\Library\Software\GIS\Client\City of Corcoran\City wide maps\2040 Future Land Use.mxd Date: 10/27/2021 Time: 9:57:35 AM User: LPSRemote Rural/Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public Parks/Open Space Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open Water Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) Attachment Item: 8b8. City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers %Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 County Road 116Oakdale Dr B r id le P a t hJef f reyLnAbilene Ln Trail LnHuntersRdg County Road 30HeatherLn Pion e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 10 Horseshoe Trl Robert LnH o r s e s h o e BendDr Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason Pkw yWillow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19ESt Homestead Trl Maple Hill RdCain RdRolling Hills RdSundanceRdCountry Rd Mohawk DrElmStLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd C ai n Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln OldSettlersRd County R oad 1 1 7 Stieg R d Bechtold RdKalk RdSchutte Rd Meister RdFoxValleyDr M y s tiq u e DrHageDr93rd Ave N Sc hut t e PlBrandywineRdChisholmT rlTessmer Rd HighBluffLnWinchesterTrl JubertLnR u shC reekRushCreek CountyDitchN u m b e rS ixteenCo u n t y Ditch N u mberThreeSouthFor k R u s h C r e e k NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP 79 Attachment Item: 8b9. 5.02 ACRES OSWALD FARM ROAD COUNTY ROAD #116 28 MCUnitsMCGARDEN 20083951.13UP OUINV=949.85INV=949.4720253946.52CO 10 HDPE20357953.30UP OU2 B20364952.52UP OU1 B20378953.27PED20379952.82PED20430948.86UP OU OU1 EINV=945.11INV=945.17COM COM COM COM COM OU OU OU OU OU UE UE UE UE UE UE UE CNDCNDCNDCNDCND GGGGGGGG F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O H:\Projects\17000\17062\TechData\CADDesign\Graphics\17062_Alin-Prof-231117.dwg : A-1Job # 1675012/1/2023 - 1:49PMCSAH 116 Grade Separated Crossing Feasibility StudyThree Rivers Park DistrictCorcoran, Hennepin County, MNFigure 1Attachment Item: 8b10. 4 STORIES OVER 1184 UNITSCOUNTY ROAD #11620378953.27PED20379952.82PED20489958.12CO20490958.01CO20525949.88PED20556950.08UP OUINV=950.12INV=949.5820588948.58ANC20589949.00UP OH EU BINV=948.74INV=948.97COM COM COM COM COM COMOUOUOUOUOU UEUE UE UE UE UE UE COMCNDCNDCNDCNDCND GGGGGGGF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OH:\Projects\17000\17062\TechData\CADDesign\Graphics\17062_Alin-Prof-231117.dwg : A-2Job # 1675012/1/2023 - 1:50PMCSAH 116 Grade Separated Crossing Feasibility StudyThree Rivers Park DistrictCorcoran, Hennepin County, MNFigure 2 8'-0"12'-0"VAR.12'-0"8'-0" SHLD.SHLD.LANE MED.LANE CONC. BARRIER MOMEN SLAB W/ ABUTMENT CAST-IN-PLACE PANEL APPROACH 6'-0"6'-0"1:25 1:25 5' -0"5' -0"< TRAIL END SECTION `68'-0" PRECAST BARREL SECTIONSPRECAST CONC. 14'x10' BOX CULVERT (PMBW) W/ FENCE WALLFRONT FACE RET. (PMBW) W/ FENCE WALLFRONT FACE RET. 1:25 1:25 0 10 20 FEETSCALE R=80.0' GENERAL PLAN CONC. MOMENT SLAB CONC. BARRIER & WINGWALLS CONC. ABUTMENT CONC. FOOTING CONC. APPROACH PANEL SHLD.SHLD.LANE LANE 8'-0"12'-0"VAR.12'-0"8'-6" TOP OF TRAIL TOP OF TRAIL GENERAL ELEVATION END SECTION PRECAST CONC. CULVERT BARRELS PRECAST CONC. BOX GROUNDLINE PROPOSED (BOX CULVERT) WINGWALL (TYP.) CAST-IN-PLACE GUARDRAIL (TYP.) GENERAL ELEVATION (ABUTMENT) BARRIER TOP OF CONC. & MOMENT SLAB (TYP.) TOP OF CONC. WINGWALL & MOMENT SLAB (TYP.) TOP OF CONC. ABUTMENT 9" COPINGSYSTEM TEXTURE & COLOR ARCHITECTURAL CONC.1:2 MAX. 1:2 MAX. PANEL CONC. APPROACH 14'-0"10'-0"`30'-0" WINGWALL`28'-0" ABUTMENT`30'-0" WINGWALL $DGN$$DATE$ Job #17062 Figure B1 for Three Rivers Park District In the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota Hennepin County CSAH 116 Trail Underpass - General Plan & Elevations Page 1 of 3 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov MEMO Meeting Date: February 22, 2024 To: City Council From: Dwight Klingbeil, Planning Technician Re: Planning Project Update Projects/comments in blue italics are new. The following is a status summary of active planning projects: 1.Commercial and Industrial Development Standards (Citywide) (City File 23-023) The purpose of this zoning ordinance amendment is to address and evaluate the allowed uses and use specific standards within commercial and industrial developments. The Council adopted a work plan at the November 20, 2023, regular meeting, and requested the Planning Commission to provide their initial feedback. The Planning Commission discussed this item at the December 5, 2023, meeting and expressed their desire Commercial and Industrial Development Standards address a number of items such as: specific architectural standards, infrastructure investment incentives, encouragement toward sustainable development practices, proper transitions of intensities and height, the permitted and conditional uses of each zoning type, verbiage, and lighting standards City Staff prepared a survey for current landowners and lessees to express their opinions on items to be addressed with this update. Staff mailed the online survey invitation to property owners and tenants whose property is either currently zoned, or guided for Commercial, Industrial, or Mixed-Use. The comment period for this survey closed on January 31, 2024. Staff is reviewing the responses in preparation for the draft update to the Commercial and Industrial Standards. At the February 8, 2024, City Council meeting, staff was directed to prioritize Rural Commercial (CR) and Transitional Rural Commercial (TCR) district updates to be approved by the end of quarter 2. Staff will prepare for a second Planning Commission discussion at the March 12th meeting. Feedback from the Planning Commission and business community Survey will be shared with the City Council at the March 28th regular Council meeting for further direction. Staff will also prepare a revised work plan to be reviewed on March 28th to reflect the change in direction. 2.Minks Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Variance (PID 27-119-23-43-0005) (City Agenda Item: 11a. Page 2 of 3 Lyndon Minks applied for a preliminary plat, a final plat, and a variance which would allow him to adjust the western lot line of his property at 6925 Old Settlers Road. The public hearing for this item was held at the January 4, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. After a brief discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request, 3:0. The Council approved this item at the January 25, 2024, Council Meeting. 3. 3019 Addition Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat (PID 07-119-23-14-0003) (City File 23-027) Craig Scherber & Associates LLC have applied for a Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a Residential and Commercial Development on the property at PID 07-119-23-14-0003. The application includes 15 commercial lots and 4 single-family residential lots. The applicant received Council feedback on a concept version of this proposal at the February 8, 2024, meeting. 4. Hope Community Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary PUD, Preliminary Plat (PIDs 11-119-23-14-0003, 11-119-23-14-0005, 11-119-23- 14-0006, and 11-119-23-11-0012) (City File 23-028). Hope Community Church submitted application materials for a Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow for a mixed-use development around Hope Community Church. The proposed development includes medical offices, retail space, market rate apartments, townhomes, senior villas, and assisted living units. The public hearing for this item was held at the February 1, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. After hearing several testimonies from the public, the Planning Commission motioned to recommend approval of the application as presented 3:1. 5. Khacholing Center Place of Worship CHOL IUP (PID 06-119-23-13-0002) (City File 23- 029) Lobsang Yeshi & Nga Thi Ngoc Nguyen, of the Khacholing Center, applied for a Interim Use Permit to hold regular religious classes within a room at 23360 Oakdale Drive. This item is complete for City review and has been scheduled for a public hearing at the March 12, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. 6. Pioneer Trail Industrial Park Final Plat & Final PUD (PID 32-119-23-43-0005, 32- 119-23-43-0006, 32-119-23-43-0013)(City File 23-030). Contour Development LLC has applied for a Final Plat and a Final PUD at 6210 Pioneer Trail. The application consists of 0 lots and 3 outlots. This application is incomplete for City review and is not currently scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 7. Lister Garage CUP (PID 32-119-23-21-0007) (City File 23-031). J Brothers Design, Build, and Remodel has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of an accessory structure with sidewalls that exceed 10 feet in height in the front yard of 23615 Julie Ann Drive. The Public Hearing for this item was held at the February 1, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. After a brief discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the application as presented. This item has been scheduled for the February 22, 2024, City Council meeting. 8. Tavera 6 Final Plat & Final PUD (PID 35-119-23-11-0003) (City File 23-032). Lennar submitted application materials for the Final Plat and Final PUD for Tavera 6th Addition, and staff is reviewing the materials for completeness. This item is complete File 23-025) Page 3 of 3 9. Woodland Hills Preliminary Plat, Rezone, & Variance (PID 36-119-23-33-0010, 36-119-23-33- 0003, 36-119-23-33-0007) (City File 23-033). Woodland Hills of Corcoran, Inc. & Gonyea Company submitted application materials for a Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and a Variance to develop 60 single-family lots on the northeast corner of the Hackamore Road and County Road 116 intersection. The proposal is to create 60 detached single-family lots, 1 amenity lot, and 5 outlots on a 36.74-acre site. Council provided informal feedback to the applicant’s concept plan (Northeast Hackamore 116 Concept Plan) during the July 27, 2023, Regular Meeting. This item is complete for City review and the public hearing is scheduled for the March 12, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. 10. Chastek Farm Preliminary Plat, Preliminary PUD, Rezoning (PID 25-119-23-12-0002) (City File 23-034). Trek Real Estate & Development, Inc. submitted an application for a Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD), and Rezoning of the Chastek Farm located at 7600 Maple Hill Road. The request is to allow the development of 117 single-family for-sale lots on the 38.16-acre site. 101 of these lots would have a width of 55 feet, and the remaining 16 would have a width of 65 feet. This item is complete for City review and is tentatively scheduled for the April 4, 2024, Planning Commission Meeting. 11. Heather Meadows 3rd Addition Preliminary Plat/OS&P (PIDs 05-119-23-31-0001 & 088-119-23- 22-0011) (City File 24-002). Mark and Markus Lee, of ML Unlimited LLC, submitted a preliminary plat application to create 12 single-family lots and 2 outlots at 22901 Oakdale Drive. The proposal includes platting the two existing homes on Oakdale Drive and extending Heather Lane southward to plat 10 additional lots. To satisfy the requirements of the Open Space & Preservation density bonuses, this proposal includes the preservation of 44.8-acres of open space in two outlots. This application is incomplete for City review and is not currently scheduled for upcoming meetings. 12. 610 Extension Business Park Concept Plan (PID 12-119-23-23-0001) (City File 24-003). United Properties submitted a Concept Plan application to develop a business park at the Oswald Farm, located at 19510 County Road 30. The narrative provided by the applicant describes the proposed business park to range from 864,000 - 1,017,500 square feet on the 76.89-acre parcel. This application is complete for City review and is scheduled for the February 22, 2024, City Council meeting. for City review and is scheduled for the March 28, 2024, regular City Council meeting. City of Corcoran 2023 City Council Schedule Agenda Item: 12. Below is a tentative schedule for City Council meetings. The items and schedule are subject to change. March 14, 2024 Work Session •Parks Fund – Review Interest Options March 14, 2024 •Presentation Commissioner Anderson from Hennepin County •The Stanchion Bar Music and Event Request for July 4, 2024 •Park Signs Plan •Construction Hours Review/Report •PNP Results •Review 4M Fund Investments •ARPA Discussion •City Assessor Contract •Comparable Cities Discussion •Logo and City Branding Update •Contruction Agreement: 7200 Willow March 21, 2024 (TENTATIVE) Host Special Charter Commission Meeting – March 21, 2024 at 5:30pm March 28, 2024 •NW Trails Resolution of Support DNR Trails Funding •Woodland Hills CPA, RZ, PP and Variance (City file 23-033) •Khacholing Center CHOL IUP (City file 23-029) •Revise Commerical/Industrial Zonng Districts (City file 23-023) •Tavera 4th Easement Vacation (City file 24-xxx) TENTATIVE •Chastek (City file 23-034) •THC Moritorium and Regulations Follow Up •Pioneer Trail FP and FPUD (City file 23-030) •Tavera 6th FP and FPUD (City file 23-032) •Award Cropland Bids April 11, 2024 •LPR Camera Discussion •Firearms Ordinance Review April 15, 2024 Page 2 of 3 • Rockford School Board Meeting April 25, 2024 • Proclamation – National Public Service Week • Public Safety Grant Spend Plan May 9, 2024 • Proclamation – National Police Week May 23, 2024 (Joint Work Session - Tentative) • Joint Work Session with Planning Commision (MET Council Representative) o Comp Plan Review May 23, 2024 • Proclamation – National Public Works Week June 13, 2024 • RFP – History and Discussion of RFP Schedule June 27, 2024 • July 11, 2024 • July 25, 2024 August 8, 2024 August 22, 2024 September 10, 2024 • Annual Charter Commission Meeting September 12, 2024 September 26, 2024 • Communications Assistant – Transition to FT November 14, 2024 • Tort Liability Coverage Waiver Page 3 of 3 • Certification of General Election 2024 November 25, 2024 December 16, 2024 • MS4 Permit Review dates with Jay on Joint Commisison Meetings -Parks and Trails