Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2024-28 Variance - Woodland Hills - FinalCity of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024�28 Motion By: Nichols Seconded By: Schultz April 115 2024 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THREE VARIANCES FOR "WOODLAND HILLS OF CORCORAN" ON THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 116 AND HACKAMORE ROAD (PID 36A 19=23-33=0007, 36A 19=23-33-0009, AND 36-119=23-33-0010) (CITY FILE NO. 23-032) WHEREAS, Woodland Hills of Corcoran, Inc. ("the applicant") requests approval of a preliminary plat for 60 residential lots, 1 amenity lot, and 5 outlots on property described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the applicant also requested approval of three variances from underlying district and performance standards, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for three variances subject to the following findings and conditions; 1. The requested variance from Section 1060.050, Subd. 7 to allow a 7.5' side setback is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant requests flexibility for builders to locate a home On a lot. It is anticipated the lots will be sold to multiple various local builders for construction of custom homes. A clear side setback will allow for consistency, avoid confusion between builders, landowners, and City staff, while still maintaining a 15' building separation. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcels of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowners. The subdivision is on a 36.74-acre site that is bordered on the south by Hackamore Road and to the west by County Road 116. These constraints result in a lot design and house placement restrictions that are unique to the project boundaries. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The underlying district structures on adjacent standards require a minimum 15' separation between lots. The requested 7.5' side setback will maintain this separation which is consistent with the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The underlying district standards require a minimum 15' separation between structures on adjacent lots. The requested 7.5 side setback 0 age 1 of 9 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION No. 2024-28 April 1 1, 2024 wIII maintain this separation which is consistent with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and maintains the Conservation Residential land use designation. f. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact on the variance. A 25' front setback shall be applied to offset the impact of granting the deviation in the side setback. The front and side setbacks shall be documented on the preliminary plat. 2. The requested variance from Section 1040.050, Subd. 8(B) to allow a garage maximum of 65% of the viewable ground floor street -facing linear building frontage for 3-car garages and 70% for 4-car garages is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance standards. There is market demand for 3-car and 4-car garages which is a reasonable use of these properties. However mpractcal to meet density b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The subject properties of the subdivision will be made available to multiple builders for custom built lots. The preference for a 3-car or 4-car garage is based on market demands which are not created by the landowner. Additionally, the City's ordinances limit and at times prohibit on -street parking, so property owners have an interest in building a home with sufficient garage space for their vehicles. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. A larger garage frontage can be minimized with a second story and/or larger setback from the road. Planned Unit Developments in the area have been granted flexibility from this standard. Additionally, it is not uncommon for older neighborhoods within the City to have either a larger garage or second garage. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. Conditions can be added to minimize the appearance of the garage to ensure harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as a deviation does not conflict with the Conservation Residential land use guiding. f. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. Houses that choose to bypass the 55% maximum garage limit shall include a second story as a way to minimize the visual impact of the larger garage. This shall be confirmed with each building permit. Page 2 of 5 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesotel a RESOLUTION NU. 2024-28 April 7 7, 2024 3. The following flexibilities from the City's buffer yard requirements in Section 1060.070, Subd. 2(J) is approved: a. The required Class B buffer yard with a 30' width for Lot 19 can be planted in the new right-of-way, north of the lot, to be dedicated as part of the plat. It is understood that the plantings in the right-of-way will eventually be removed when the future roadway is constructed. A berm is not permitted in this area to satisfy the buffer yard requirements. b. Along the north and east project boundary, existing vegetation can count to the buffer yard planting requirements if the vegetation meets the following criteria: i. Plantings must have a caliper of more than 2". ii. Plantings must be located within the project boundaries. wards iii. Plantings must be of a desired species, including elm, aspen, cherry, oaks, or other similar species that are on either preferred tree list in Appendix B or Appendix C of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The buffer yard variance as discussed in paragraph 3 is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. There is existing natural vegetation in varying degrees that provides an existing buffer between the properties to the north and east. It is reasonable to allow existing plantings to offset the required numbers of new plantings in order to maintain the health of the existing buffer. Additionally, the buffer yard ordinance allows local roads shown in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to satisfy buffer yard requirements. The road right-of-way north of Lot 19 is not shown on the Comprehensive Plan but is still required by the City's infrastructure feasibility study for a future connection to County Road 116 based on Hennepin County's spacing requirements. The buffer yard plantings cannot be located in right-of-way per the ordinance. However, this right-of-way will likely remain until the properties to the north develop/re-develop several years in the future at an urban density. It is reasonable that the buffer yard plantings be located in the right-of-way until the road is constructed. It is understood that the buffer yard for Lot 19 will eventually turn into a road and the plantings will not remain in perpetuity. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not created by the landowner. The existing vegetation of the property and the required right-of-way are unique to the property and the conditions were not created by the landowner. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The flexibilities granted for this variance will result in a substantial buffer that will allow healthy plant growth. Page3of5 City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2024-28 April 11, 2024 d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The flexibilities granted for this variance will result in a substantial buffer for existing neighborhoods without placing burden on them to provide their own screening from new development. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The buffer yard ordinance is a strategy to protect rural character, and the approved flexibilities will still provide the significant screening desired to protect rural character. f. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. The following shall be addressed with submittal of the final plat to meet the flexibilities granted in this variance request: i. The applicant must provide an updated tree survey for all plantings proposed to count towards the buffer yard requirements on the north and east property lines in order to finalize the number of new plantings required in these areas. 5. The applicant is required to record this resolution with the Hennepin County's Recorder's Office and provide proof of recording to the City. VOTING AYE ® McKee, Tom ® Bottema, Jon ® Nichols, Jeremy ® Schultz, Alan ® Vehrenkamp, Dean VOTING NAY ❑ McKee, Tom ❑ Bottema, Jon ❑ Nichols, Jeremy ❑ Schultz, Alan, Jeremy ❑ Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 11t'' day of April, 2024. ATTEST: w Michell'�Friedrich —City Clerk Tom cKee -Mayor Page 4 of 5 City Seal City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION No. 2®24�28 ATTACHMENT A April 7 77 2024 Parcel 1: The East 450.00 feet, as measured along the north and south lines, of the South 933.80 feet as measured at right angles to the south line, of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW Y4 of SW Y4) of Section 36, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Abstract Property. Parcel 2: The South 933.80 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW Y4 of SW Y4) of Section 367 Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota as measured at right angles to the south line thereof; except the East 450 feet a south lines thereof, and except that part thereof which lies distant 40 feet East o Abstract property. f the West line of said section. s measured along the north and West of a line parallel with and Parcel 3: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW %4 of SW %4), of Section 36, Township 119, Range 23, lying North of the South 933.80 feet as measured at right angles to the South line thereof. Except the West 450.00 feet of the North 200.00 feet as measured at right angles to the North and West lines thereof. Also except the West 40.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Page5of5