Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2023-07-27 Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda July 27, 2023 - 7:00 pm 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval 4. Commission Representatives* 5. Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6. Presentations/Recognitions 7. Consent Agenda a. November 2022/December 2022 Council Minutes* b. Financial Claims* c. Resolution 2023-60 Police Officer Declaration of PERA Contribution - Darren Bohlsen* d. Resolution 2023-61 Police Officer Declaration of PERA Contribution – Levi Siljander* e. EAW Notice of Decision- Hope* f. Horseshoe Bend Drainage Improvements - Accept Plans/Specs and Authorize Bids* g. Consultant for State Bonding* h. Hackamore Road Improvements – Change Order 1* i. Heidecker Garage CUP/IUP* j. Resignation – City Administrator Jessica Beise* k. Temporary Liquor License-NW Area Jaycees Aug 11-12, 2023* l. Sound Waiver at 9310 Bechtold Road* m. Street Maintenance – Maltene Based Restorative Seal Quote* 8. Planning Business -- Public Comment Opportunity a. 116/Hackamore Concept Plan* b. Kariniemi/Jensen Sketch Plan* 9. Unfinished Business – Public Comment Opportunity a. Three Rivers Park District Coop* b. Granicus Project Update* c. Council Chambers Sound System* d. City Center Drive 10. New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a. City Administrator Search Process* b. Administration Department Reorganization* c. Staff Planning – Organizational Chart* 11. Staff Reports a. Planning Projects Update* b. Code Enforcement Report* c. Audit Update* d. Quarter 2 City of Corcoran Budget Report* HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Council meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 892 1263 6354 Press *9 to speak during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89212636354 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 892 1263 6354 Participants can utilize the Raise Hand function to be recognized to speak during the Public Comment sections in the meeting. Participant video feeds will be muted. In-person comments will be received first, with the hybrid electronic means option following. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov * 12. Closed Session a. City Center Drive Improvements 13. 2023 City Council Schedule* 14. Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.corcoranmn.gov. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 4. Summary The advisory commission representatives for the July 27, 2023, Council meeting are as follows: • Planning Commission: Corrine Brummond • Parks and Trails Commission: Tom Anderson Financial/Budget N/A Council Action N/A Attachments N/A Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Topic: Action Required Informational STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7a. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Michelle Friedrich Topic: Draft Council Minutes – November 21, 2022 Draft Council Minutes – December 2022 Action Required: Informational Summary The draft Council Minutes for November 21, 2022, and December 2022 will be emailed on Tuesday, July 25, with hard copies provided to Council the evening of the July 27meeting. Attachments (Hard copies will be provided July 27, 2023) 1. Draft Council Minutes – November 21, 2022 2. Draft Council Work Session Minutes – December 8, 2022 3. Draft Council Minutes – December 8, 2022 4. Draft Council Minutes – December 22, 2022 1 CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Minutes November 22, 2022 – 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on November 22, 2022, in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City Council meeting was held in person and the public was present in person and remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee, Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Vehrenkamp were present. Councilor Bottema was absent. City Administrator Beise, Planner McKeown, Public Works Director Mattson, and City Planner Lindahl were present. 1. Call to Order/Roll Call Mayor McKee called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2. Pledge of Allegiance Mayor McKee invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Agenda Approval MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to approve the agenda as presented. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) 4. Commission Representatives Mayor McKee noted Planning Commissioner Shoulak and Parks and Trails Commissioner Wyffels joined the meeting remotely. 5. Open Forum (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person or telephonically during Open Forum for items not included on the agenda. City Administrator Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. 6. Presentations/Recognitions 7. Consent Agenda a. Financial Claims* b. Vollrath Ag Building CUP* c. Tavera 5th Final Plat and PUD* d. Tort Liability Waiver e. Designating Polling Place Locations for 2023* f. Schedule Work Session – 2023 Fee Schedule* Council requested item 7b and 7c, be pulled for further discussion. Council noted 7e and recognized and thanked Hope Community Church and St. Thomas Church as polling place venues. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz, to approve agenda items 7a, 7d, 7e, and 7f as presented. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) Council discussed wetland and flood plain updated surveys near the west end of the driveway on the 7b Vollrath Ag Building CUP. Planner McKeown noted the applicant would need to mitigate flood impact elsewhere on the property and noted there is substantial amounts of land if mitigation is necessary. Public Works Director Mattson noted applicant can complete a watershed application with a permit fee, or the applicant can readjust the plans to stay away from the watershed area. Public Works Director Mattson noted if applicant desires to fill in any portion of the watershed area, a watershed permit would be Agenda Item: 7a1. 2 necessary and would need to indicate mitigation processes. Council and staff determined a meeting with applicant would be necessary, and applicant would work with staff on the project. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by McKee, to approve agenda items 7c as amended. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) Council discussed architectural upgrades and tree preservation regarding agenda item 7c. Planner Lindahl noted the parcels located on the west side of Tamarack have architectural upgrades. Council noted the 32 trees accidentally removed by the developer, and the 32 one-on-one tree replacement for the 32 trees. Council noted tree preservation was one of the major PUD benefits of the development, and reviewed staff and developer dialogue regarding the process regarding the mistake. Council requested clarification of how the tree replacement will be completed, and what process will ensure this situation does not happen again to adhere to the PUD benefit. City Planner Lindahl outlined the process within the Tavera development for review of tree preservation areas include as part of the PUD, fencing protection of future areas, and noted within the area of the accidental tree removal there was a large section of trees that were to be removed. Council noted the error by the developer Lennar Homes, and requested including the same caliper inch for replacement trees as the trees that were erroneously removed and to adhere to the tree preservation benefit included in the PUD. City Planner Lindahl noted options for future tree preservation options regarding the PUD benefit. Council noted tabling the item until the next Council meeting to allow the developer time to present a written plan with details regarding preserved tree areas in the remaining development and adhere to the tree preservation PUD benefit. City Planner Lindahl noted requesting a written plan for tree preservation areas when Tavera phase 6 begins, and noted though it is likely graded, it would be a starting point with the application process. Council and staff discussed current grading is almost complete in the Tavera project, and all tree removal has been completed, but implementing the process now is good policy for future development PUD applications. City Planner Lindahl noted the developer will be replacing the 32 trees that were removed. Council noted adding language to include an inch-for-inch tree caliper for trees erroneously for in future developments, with replacement somewhere within the site, or at the discretion of Council to a future park area. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Nichols, to approve agenda items 7c, with addition of tree preservation verbiage in Phase 6 of the Tavera development. Voting Aye: McKee, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp Nay: Abstain: Nichols (Motion carried 3:0:1) 8. Planning Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee noted 8b Public Hearing for Walcott Glen, and noted separate public comment opportunities on items 8a, 8c, 8d, and 8e, and invited residents to communicate in-person or telephonically during the public comment opportunity for Planning Business items 8a. City Administrator Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. City Administrator Beise noted several residents submitted comment cards for 8a. City Administrator Beise noted the 5-minute time limit for each speaker. a. Corcoran Farms Industrial Park Preliminary Plat Tom Feehan, 20410 Larkin Road, opposes the Corcoran Farms Industrial Park Preliminary Plat, and opined on traffic and PUD as areas of concern regarding Corcoran Farms Industrial Park and opined that an entrance through the existing commercial district would be a better access, and noted safety concerns with access off Larkin Road. Mr. Feehan opined on the traffic study completed, the build-to-suit status for potential renters and future PUD requests Council will have to review. Brandy Kelly, 20129 Larkin Road, opposes the Corcoran Farms Industrial Park Preliminary Plat, and opined on the rural area and quietness of the existing neighborhood, and opined Corcoran Farms Industrial Park will change the rural character of their neighborhood. Gail Waldorf, 20117 Larkin Road, opposes the Corcoran Farms Industrial Park Preliminary Plat, and opined on the rezoning of the parcel where Corcoran Industrial Farms is proposed to be located. Ms. Waldorf opined on traffic increasing on Larkin Road, and loss of home value and equity due to the rezoned parcel to light industrial across the street where Corcoran Farm Industrial Park is proposed. Ms. Waldorf opined on the trail proposed through the industrial park and safety issue of a trail running through an industrial park. Ms. Waldorf opined on alternative locations for the industrial park that are not located near a residential 3 neighborhood. Ms. Waldorf opined access of County Road 50 rather than Larkin Road would be a safer access. Ms. Waldorf asked Council to postpone their decision until a full Council was present. Linda Benson, 20205 Larkin Road, opposes the Corcoran Farms Industrial Park Preliminary Plat, and opined on the location of Corcoran Farms Industrial Park near a residential neighborhood and asked Council to not approve the preliminary plat. Ryan Richter, 7225 Buckskin Trail, opposes the Corcoran Farms Industrial Park Preliminary Plat, and requested Council postpone a decision. Mr. Richter opined on location of the industrial park and impacts to the safety of the neighborhood, future road enlargements, and how the industrial park will change the character and tranquility of their neighborhood. Mr. Richter noted if the project is approved, to consider increasing the buffer towards the Larkin Road properties. City Administrator Beise answered public comment questions regarding the industrial park access off County Road 50 and noted the Environmental Assessment Worksheet indicated Hennepin County response to an access off County Road 50 would not be allowed. City Administrator Beise noted Three Rivers Park District also commented on the trail running through the industrial park. Council questioned if access could be granted through 75th from the current industrial park, if applicant were to purchase the vacant lot, could the applicant petition the City to connect that street and be a developer cost. City Planner Lindahl responded that a traffic study would need to be completed to review that route access, but indicated the road could be extended and cross a DNR public waterway and would require DNR permitting. Public Works Director Mattson noted the process when a project is presented as a development, and noted as there is no right-ot-way connection with the cul-de-sac, that access is not factored into the EAW. Public Works Director Mattson noted roads connecting to the property were reviewed and included Larkin Road and a future County Road 50 connection as an emergency access. Public Works Director Mattson noted a traffic study on 75th and County Road 116 intersection was not part of the original study, and noted new studies would need to be completed, and would likely still result in the connection access off Larkin Road. Council clarified for public record the property was previously rezoned light industrial in 2018 and present zoning is not part of the Council discussion tonight. Council noted discussion is centered around whether the project is a PUD project, as if it was not a PUD, and there were no variance requests presented to Council by the applicant, the project really wouldn’t be presented to Council. City Administrator Beise clarified the project would be presented to Council as a plat for approval. City Planner Lindahl outlined the background information for the proposed project and the flexibility request for parking setbacks and loading docks. City Planner Lindahl added a PUD does offer more flexibility to control what the building looks like, and conditions can be added as requirement versus standard zoning code. Council and staff discussed a sidewalk or trail improvement on the north side of Larkin Road. Council asked for discussion on rezoning the proposed parcel to medium density and rezoning the property east of the substation to light industrial. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the rezoning process, land use, the Comprehensive Plan, and city’s master plan on city development. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the land use plan designates the Corcoran Farms Industrial Park location as industrial. City Planner Lindahl noted the change was included with 2040 Comprehensive Plan update in 2018, and changed the parcel from medium-density residential to industrial and went through a public process, with several meetings related to the change, and noted a similar process would need to be completed for an amendment to change to rezone the parcel from industrial to something else. City Planner Lindahl noted the process is not simple, and there are several things needing review, but noted the City can go through a public process and the Council can make a change, which then needs approval by the Met Council. City Planner Lindahl added if the land use is approved, both the City Council and the Met Council, then Council can rezone the property to be consistent with the land use. Council noted the deadline for the current application is December 29, 2022, and does not allow for postponement of a Council decision. Council noted questions during the public comment period were answered by Council and staff. Council requested the presentation for Corcoran Farms Industrial Park proceed. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the history and background of the preliminary plat, the completed traffic study, and the EAW with comments by the DNR, County and Three Rivers Park District. City Planner Lindahl noted the applicant revised their plans and tried to address both the Planning Commission and Council comments. City Planner Lindahl noted the project square footage was reduce by about 11,00 square feet, and noted the southwest building was reduced in width by 20 feet to allow a retaining wall in their building to shift east 20 feet and significant landscaping to the area, essentially a triple row of landscaping with the current revisions. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the height of buildings A and B along 4 Larkin were reduced from 40 feet to 30 feet in height, and noted the current district allows for 45-foot-high buildings. City Planner Lindahl noted buildings A and D on the west were increased to 90-feet long, with 30- and 36-foot-high wing walls to screen the loading docks, with drive isles between buildings A and B removed. City Planner Lindahl noted a 10-foot-high composite fence was added on the west property line to screen loading docks, and the addition of landscape islands in the parking lot to allow larger trees to be planted, due to a limit on planted height material located under the overhead power line. Council and staff discussed tree height and type include deciduous trees that are 2 ½ inches. City Planner Lindahl noted the trail was relocated as recommended by the Parks and Trails Commission and Three Rivers Park District. City Planner Lindahl also noted the revised plans eliminate parking setback to internal lot lines for Building C and E, and no longer request flexibility. City Planner Lindahl noted additional landscaping was added specifically to the west property line, with berms along Larkin Road. City Planner Lindahl reviewed Blue Bonnet will extend north through this project with a temporary cul de sac eventually extends north. City Planner Lindahl noted Hennepin County has indicated they will not allow access where the current emergency drive is shown, and where the property touches 50. City Planner Lindahl noted a plan for a future through street further to the west is necessary and the applicant is providing that future street connection. City Planner Lindahl noted the feasibility study that was completed as part of the EAW, required the applicant to make offsite improvements, as well as turn lanes on Larkin and 116, Larkin and Blue Bonnet, and applicant is responsible for extending the sewer and water to the site. City Planner Lindahl noted there is a request for flexibility on the landscape requirements to revise the plans to meet the code requirements, however the plan provides slightly more landscaping than is required by the code. City Planner Lindahl noted the applicant needs to show on the plan some additional screening within the parking lots to the screen headlights, and noted the number of trees and shrubs included meets or exceeds code requirements. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the PUD flexibility requested to allow the loading docks allow for screening by the wing walls, with additional landscaping and fencing on the west side of the property. City Planner Lindahl reviewed landscaping along Blue Bonnet provides screening, as well as large evergreen trees planted on the edge of the building to provide screening along wing wall locations, with several evergreen trees to provide the screening of the loading area. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the trail location recommended by the Parks and Trails Commission and Three Rivers Park District and specified the east-west trail is a private trail that the developer will build and maintain and provides another connection through the site. City Planner Lindahl noted a sidewalk along the right of way of Blue Bonnet that will extend all the way up to County Road 50. City Planner Lindahl reviewed Park dedication will be required for this site and credit will be given for the net area of the trail easement or cash in lieu for anything remaining. Council and staff discussed trail requirements. City Planner Lindahl noted the applicant will be required to construct the trail to the Three Rivers Park District standards which is a 10-foot-wide trail, and the City’s requirement of an 8-foot-wide trail. Council and staff discussed pedestrian routes along Larkin Road, lighting, height of light poles noting keeping them as short as possible and turned off at reasonable hour to minimize noise pollution, and the removal of trees along Larkin Road. Council noted key requirements and expectations within the PUD is adequate transitions between adjacent zones, and how to rectify the change made due to power company’s restriction on landscaping height. Council noted plantings within the gas line main easement area. Council and the applicant had a lengthy discussion regarding PUD flexibility versus straight zoning code requirements and the project, City, and neighborhood impacts. Council discussed the secondary frontage staff mentioned in the staff report and including as a condition or add in the resolution to enhance the secondary frontage. Council noted including additional landscaping the applicant mentioned they would be open to regarding a different type of tree or additional plantings in the parking lot islands. Council noted higher buffers between buildings and the residential areas and noted a 6- foot fence would make more sense than a four-foot pads. Council reviewed the likelihood of shrubs growing beyond six feet to 10-feet and considered that more beneficial in the long-term. Council discussed fencing alternatives and public safety. Council and staff discussed including windows, or faux windows on the buildings to break up the solid wall and utilizing color changes to mitigate the appearance of the building to appear as an office building rather than an industrial building. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Vehrenkamp, to table the item until the December 8 Council meeting. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) 5 Mayor McKee called for a 5-minute recess at 9:30 pm. Council reconvened at 9:35 pm. b. Public Hearing – Vacations for Drainage and Utility Easement – Ravinia 11th Addition City Planner Lindahl reviewed the vacation for drainage and utility easement for Walcott Glen. Mayor McKee opened the Public Hearing. City Administrator Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No persons participated in the public comment period. Mayor McKee closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz, to close the Public Hearing. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Nichols, approving Resolution 2022-140 Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement in Ravinia 11th Addition (PID 36-119-23-44-0030, 36-119-23-44-0031, 36-119-23-44- 0032, 36-119-23-44-0033 And 36-119-23-44-0024) (City File No. 22-072) Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) c. Paulsen Development Rights Appeal Mayor McKee noted the public comment opportunity on item 8c-e, and invited residents to communicate in- person or telephonically during the public comment opportunity. City Administrator Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No persons participated in the public comment period. City Planner Lindahl noted the development rights appeal was requested by Gerald Paulson to evaluate development rights 22101 County Road 30 and noted Mr. Paulson would like to subdivide the property he owns, and that Mr. Paulson believes there are development rights available. City Planner Lindahl noted the burden of proof is on the applicant to provide information that the development rights map is incorrect. City Planner Lindahl noted the 113.5-acre farm was subdivided in 2000, and prior to subdivision there were 11 total development rights assigned with one of the rights assigned to the existing 20+ acre farmstead property. Council and staff discussed option of buying a development right from the adjacent property. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz, Denying an Amendment to the Development Rights Map for Property at 22101 County Road 30 (PID 09-119-23-32-0002) (City File 22-067) Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) d. O’Brien Concept Plan City Planner Lindahl reviewed Council discussion at the August 25 Council meeting, and noted Council support of the concept, questions surrounding street alignment, and a feasibility study scheduled in October. Council and staff discussed street infrastructure, recapture agreements, and a future street connection between Rolling Hills Road and Pioneer Trail. Council and staff discussed turn lanes, and driveway access. Council provided feedback to applicant and requested applicant to follow up with staff and city attorney. Mayor McKee allowed late public comment on item 8d. Jack Kirley, 6220 Rolling Hills Road, commented on the O’Brien concept plan, and opined on the safety of the proposed road on a hill. Mr. Kirley noted the private drive on the west side. Mr. Turley opined on additional traffic, turn lanes, wetlands, and utilities. Jim Lehtola, 6230 Rolling Hills Road, commented on the concept and opined on the road and driveway location. Mr. Lehtola commented on timelines for the project, traffic, and an alternate industrial access point. Council and staff discussed future timeline and noted Planning Commission review on December 1, with Council review on December 22. City Planner Lindahl noted an approved project in 2004 included Rolling Hills Road and HWY 55, prior to the city’s comprehensive plan, showed a connection of HWY 55 frontage road, between Rolling Hills Road and Pioneer Trail. Public comment continued. 6 John Reid, 6210 Rolling Hills Road, commented on the intersection of the future Pioneer Trail and Rolling Hills Road connection. Mr. Reid commented on tractor trailer truck traffic and noted opposition to the Pioneer Trail and Rolling Hills Road connection. David Wendel, 6301 Horseshoe Bend Drive, commented on the location of the proposed concept plan in relation to the distance from his residence of 36 feet from his property line. Mr. Wendel opined on the location of the grading is where his garage is located and would interfere with the right-of-way according to the sketch plan. Jim Dahl, 6300 Rolling Hills Road, agreed with previous comments, and opined on restricted weight limits on road. Public Works Director Mattson noted for clarification, there would be no turn lanes off Rolling Hills Road with the proposed concept plan, however, would be a consideration when the road is extended in the future. Mayor McKee allowed additional public comment. Sarah Lehtola, 6230 Rolling Hills Road, opined on Rolling Hills Road narrow and hilly characteristics, and opined on the increased traffic and safety concerns. e. Confidential Properties Concept Plan City Planner Lindahl noted the proposal is for a mix of 49 single family homes, a 300-unit market rate apartment complex, and 1.8-acre commercial lot. City Planner Lindahl noted the parcel is guided commercial on the easter third and general mixed use in the central third. City Planner Lindahl noted the applicant would be requesting a comprehensive plan amendment and noted the northwest corner would remain commercial, and the central portion where the apartment complex would be located would need to be re-guided to high-density residential, and the western third to low-density residential. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the property was guided mixed use in the both the 2030 and the 2040 comprehensive plans and specifically noted to provide business development opportunities and jobs creation tied specifically to the development of the Dayton interchange and the extension of highway 610 which is going to connect to county road 30. City Planner Lindahl outlined the rezoning, and noted applicant request to re-guide with the commercial section retaining the C-2 zoning and the central portion retain the general mixed-use zoning. City Planner Lindahl noted the general mixed-use zoning needs to be consistent with the general mixed use land use, so the applicant would need to rezone to RMF-3 to be compatible with the high-density residential land use. City Planner Lindahl noted the West portion would be rezone to RSF-3 single and two family residential. City Planner noted the concept sketch appears to comply with northeast standards and most setback requirements. City Planner Lindahl noted the wetlands in the north and natural resource area the northwest corner and identified in the significant natural resource inventory and high-priority wooded area. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the gated access community for the apartment complex, and noted variances would be necessary for parking requests. Jordan Tycon, Continental Properties, reviewed the concept sketch, noted the wetland delineation was completed indicating the natural resource areas, and reviewed parcel zoning and amending the comprehensive plan for a future single-family residential development phase on the west side. Mr. Tycon reviewed the concept sketch parameters of the housing brand and noted the 300 units would be direct garden style access with 20 units per building. Mr. Tycon noted a mix of surface and covered parking with attached and detached garages, a clubhouse, a fitness center, and a pool at the clubhouse. Mr. Tycon reviewed resident demographics and noted about 9 percent of the residents typically are school-aged children in grades K-12, 40 percent of residents have pets, and the complex would house approximately 637 total residents. Mr. Tycon reviewed the variance request for parking. Council and staff discussed the Maple Grove water agreement and noted Maple Grove would need to be contacted and presented with a plan. Council discussed the rezoning, intent of concept sketch within the district, and the rezoning of 80 acres of mixed use in exchange for a residential subdivision. Council consensus was that the concept sketch was not the right fit or the right time in the current proposed location. 9. Unfinished Business Mayor McKee noted the public comment opportunity on item 9a, and invited residents to communicate in- person or telephonically during the public comment opportunity for Unfinished. City Administrator Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No persons participated in the public comment period. a. City Calendar 2022 Review 7 Council and staff discussed the December 22 Council work session and regular meeting. 10. New Business a. Council Calendar 2023 City Administrator Beise reviewed the 2023 calendar and noted December 14 for final budget approval, and December 28 as the last day to submit for the truth and taxation. Council and staff discussed potential final dates for December Council meeting(s). Council noted scheduling the firearm ordinance into 2023. 11. Staff Reports a. Active Planning Applications: Council received report. 12. 2022-23 Council Schedule Council received schedule. 13. Adjournment MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Vehrenkamp to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) Meeting adjourned at 11:14 pm on November 22, 2022. Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Agenda Item 7b. Council Meeting Date:7/27/2023 Prepared By:Maggie Ung Amount Project name $0.00 -$ $509,111.43 509,111.43$ 155,092.16$ 664,203.59$ Date Paid to Amount Description 7/7/2023 ADP 380.68$ Payroll Processing Fee 7/10/2023 RevTrak 283.96$ Credit Card Fee 7/11/2023 InvoiceCloud 1,468.06$ Credit Card Fee 7/12/2023 MN Dept of Revenue 80.66$ Fuel Tax 7/13/2023 ADP 117,378.56$ Net Payroll and Taxes 7/14/2023 RevTrak 50.00$ Credit Card Fee 7/14/2023 InvoiceCloud 90.05$ Credit Card Fee 7/14/2023 Optum Bank 4,278.29$ Employee HSA 7/14/2023 MN PERA 24,726.05$ Employee Pension 7/17/2023 Postalia 800.00$ Postage 7/17/2023 MN State - Empower 5,555.85$ Employee Deferred Comp/Healthcare Savings Total 155,092.16$ FINANCIAL CLAIMS CHECK RANGE FUND #500 ESCROW CLAIMS Paid to SEE THE REGISTER FOR #500 CLAIMS Total Total Fund #500 = (See attached Payments Detail) TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL Auto Deductions / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursements ALL OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMS Check Register (See attached Check Detail Registers) Total Checks Total of Auto Deductions CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 1/9Page: 07/21/2023 10:18 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 07/14/2023 - 07/27/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 34048 340483,586.25 07/27/23473653RECONCILIATION REVIEW - FINANCIAL ABDO LLP06/30/23100-41500-50300 3,586.25 Total For Check 34048 Check 34049 3404975.00 07/27/23203189K9 BOARDINGALL SEASONS CANINE COUNTRY C07/16/23100-42100-50438 75.00 Total For Check 34049 Check 34050 3405027.00 07/27/231PDP-NYJ9-GVPRBADGE HOLDER AND REEL/WIRELESS MOUAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES07/16/23100-41920-50210 3405050.93 07/27/231PDP-NYJ9-GVPRBADGE HOLDER AND REEL/WIRELESS MOUAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES07/16/23100-42100-50210 77.93 Total For Check 34050 Check 34051 3405139.05 07/27/232376176UNLEADED 87BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY07/10/23100-41900-50212 340511,777.17 07/27/232376176UNLEADED 87BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY07/10/23100-42100-50212 34051136.71 07/27/232376176UNLEADED 87BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY07/10/23100-43100-50212 340511,249.76 07/27/232376175ULS DYED KODIAKBEAUDRY OIL COMPANY07/10/23100-43100-50212 3,202.69 Total For Check 34051 Check 34052 3405244.00 07/27/236908SQUAD 566 UNIT NUMBER DECALSBLACKFIRE CREATIVE07/07/23416-42100-50550 44.00 Total For Check 34052 Check 34053 3405315.00 07/27/2307-2023GAS BILL JUNE 2023CENTERPOINT ENERGY 07/07/23100-41900-50381 3405321.14 07/27/2307-2023GAS BILL JUNE 2023CENTERPOINT ENERGY 07/07/23100-43100-50381 36.14 Total For Check 34053 Check 34054 34054610.35 07/27/2303212023LAND LINE 763-420-4061 FINAL PAYMECENTURY LINK03/21/23100-43100-50321 610.35 Total For Check 34054 Check 34055 34055133.06 07/27/234161391295CITY HALL MATSCINTAS - 47007/12/23100-41900-50400 340556.00 07/27/234161391306DISPOSIBLE BATHROOM MATCINTAS - 47007/12/23100-43100-50223 3405518.20 07/27/234160538515GRAY MICROFIBER WIPECINTAS - 47007/05/23100-43100-50400 3405555.12 07/27/234160538501LG BATH TOWELCINTAS - 47007/05/23100-43100-50400 3405580.82 07/27/234160538518SHOP TOWELS/CRT BLUECINTAS - 47007/05/23100-43100-50400 3405555.12 07/27/234157910954LG BATH TOWELSCINTAS - 47006/07/23100-43100-50400 3405538.11 07/27/234161391392CRT BLUE/CABINETCINTAS - 47007/12/23100-43100-50400 3405555.12 07/27/234161391351LG BATH TOWELCINTAS - 47007/12/23100-43100-50400 34055194.17 07/27/234160538690UNIFORMSCINTAS - 47007/05/23100-43100-50417 34055194.17 07/27/234161391536UNIFORMSCINTAS - 47007/12/23100-43100-50417 829.89 Total For Check 34055 Check 34056 3405651.44 07/27/235165616449OFFICE DISINFECTING/LUBRICANT EYE CINTAS - 47007/06/23100-43100-50210 51.44 Total For Check 34056 Check 34057 34057942.50 07/27/23BP23-0011-2BP23-0011 STAFF TIME JUNE 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 34057162.50 07/27/23BP23-0006.4BP23-0006 STAFF TIME JUNE 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 340571,381.25 07/27/23BP23-0022-2BP23-0022 STAFF TIME JUNE 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 34057178.75 07/27/23BP23-0021BP23-0021 STAFF TIME JUNE 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 3405765.00 07/27/23BP23-0023BP23-0023 STAFF TIME JUNE 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 2/9Page: 07/21/2023 10:18 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 07/14/2023 - 07/27/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 34057 34057422.50 07/27/23BP23-0016-3BP23-0016 STAFF TIME JUNE 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 34057146.25 07/27/23BP22-0029.10BP22-0029 STAFF TIME JUNE 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 3405748.75 07/27/23BP22-0034-2BP22-0034 STAFF TIME JUNE 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 3405732.50 07/27/23BP22-0044.3BP22-0044 STAFF TIME JUNE 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 3405732.50 07/27/23BP22-0014-9BP22-0014 STAFF TIME JUNE 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 34057200.00 07/27/23BP22-0029.11BP22-0029 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FEECITY OF CORCORAN07/14/23100-00000-22205 3405765.00 07/27/23BP22-0026-620130 LARKIN RD STAFF TIME MAY 202CITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 3405765.00 07/27/23BP22-0049BP22-0049 STAFF PLANNER TIME AUGUSCITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 3405765.00 07/27/23BP22-0034BP22-0034 19800 HACKAMORE RD STAFF CITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 3405765.00 07/27/23BP22-0036BP22-0036 19330 CO RD 30 STAFF TIMCITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 34057227.50 07/27/23BP22-003320420 DUFFNEY CIR STAFF TIME SEPT CITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 34057666.25 07/27/23BP22-0033.220420 DUFFNEY CIR STAFF TIME OCT 2CITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 3405781.25 07/27/23BP22-0044BP22-0044 19500 STIEG RD STAFF TIMCITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 3405765.00 07/27/23BP22-0044.2BP22-0044 19500 STIEG RD STAFF TIMCITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 34057243.75 07/27/23BP22-0033.320420 DUFFNEY CIR STAFF TIME NOV 2CITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 3405716.25 07/27/23BP22-0037BP22-0037 6801 WILLOW DR STAFF TIMCITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 3405781.25 07/27/23BP22-0031BP22-0031 ST THERESE STAFF TIME NOCITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 3405797.50 07/27/23BP22-0050BP22-0050 STAFF TIME NOV 2022CITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 340571,153.75 07/27/23BP22-0050-2BP22-0050 STAFF TIME DEC 2022CITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 34057113.75 07/27/23BP22-0049-2BP22-0049 STAFF TIME DEC 2022CITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 3405732.50 07/27/23BP22-0033.4BP22-0033 20420 DUFFNEY CIR STAFF CITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 34057861.25 07/27/23BP22-0049-3BP22-0049 STAFF TIME JAN 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/05/23100-00000-22205 34057113.75 07/27/23BP22-0050-3BP22-0050 STAFF TIME JAN 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405797.50 07/27/23BP22-0029.6BP22-0029 STAFF TIME JAN 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405748.75 07/27/23BP23-0003BP23-0003 STAFF TIME JAN 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405748.75 07/27/23BP22-0029.8BP22-0029 STAFF TIME FEB 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405781.25 07/27/23BP22-0050-4BP22-0050 STAFF TIME FEB 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 34057812.50 07/27/23BP23-0003.2BP23-0003 STAFF TIME FEB 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405732.50 07/27/23BP22-0012BP22-0012 STAFF TIME FEB 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405765.00 07/27/23BP23-0006.3BP23-0006 STAFF TIME FEB 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405797.50 07/27/23BP22-0029.9BP22-0029 STAFF TIME MAR 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 34057455.00 07/27/23BP23-0003.3BP23-0003 7600 MAPLE HILL RD STAFF CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 34057325.00 07/27/23BP23-0006.2BP23-0006 STAFF TIME MAR 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405781.25 07/27/23BP22-0050-5BP22-0050 STAFF TIME MAR 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405716.25 07/27/23BP22-0033-5BP22-0033 STAFF TIME MAR 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405732.50 07/27/23BP22-0037-4BP22-0037 STAFF TIME MAR 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405731.00 07/27/23BP22-0050-6BP22-0050 STAFF TIME APR 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405717.75 07/27/23BP23-0010BP23-0010 52 STIEG RD STAFF TIME ACITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405748.75 07/27/23BP23-0006BP23-0006 STAFF TIME APR 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405781.25 07/27/23BP23-0003-2BP23-0003 7600 STAFF TIME APRIL 20CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 34057243.75 07/27/23BP23-0016BP23-0016 7985 EAGLE RIDGE RD STAFCITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 34057780.00 07/27/23BP22-0037-2BP22-0037 STAFF TIME APR 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23100-00000-22205 3405716.25 07/27/23BP23-0009BP23-0009 STAFF TIME APR 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/07/23100-00000-22205 34057113.75 07/27/23BP22-0037-3BP22-0037 STAFF TIME MAY 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/07/23100-00000-22205 3405781.25 07/27/23BP23-0016-2BP23-0016 STAFF TIME MAY 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/07/23100-00000-22205 340571,945.25 07/27/23BP23-0010-2BP23-0010 STAFF TIME MAY 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/07/23100-00000-22205 34057199.75 07/27/23BP23-0011BP23-0011 STAFF TIME MAY 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/07/23100-00000-22205 3405797.50 07/27/23BP23-0022BP23-0022 STAFF TIME MAY 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/07/23100-00000-22205 3405765.00 07/27/23BP22-0029.7BP22-0029 STAFF TIME MAY 2023CITY OF CORCORAN07/07/23100-00000-22205 3405728,896.35 07/27/2300001508BD INVOICE 00001508 WATER TOWER PRCITY OF CORCORAN07/06/23601-00000-16500 42,437.60 Total For Check 34057 Check 34058 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 3/9Page: 07/21/2023 10:18 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 07/14/2023 - 07/27/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 34058 34058295.05 07/27/23177218129PW INTERNET JULY 2023COMCAST - 93089903507/05/23100-43100-50380 295.05 Total For Check 34058 Check 34059 34059125.13 07/27/2307052023PHONE SERVICES 07/10/2023-08/09/20COMCAST 004489307/05/23100-43100-50321 125.13 Total For Check 34059 Check 34060 34060676.00 07/27/23353935LCD MONITORCOMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH07/11/23100-41920-50221 340602,904.00 07/27/23353171IT SUPPORT SERVICES 6/7/2023-6/28/COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH06/30/23100-41920-50300 34060885.00 07/27/23354121MONTHLY BILLING FOR AUGUST (SIRIS COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH07/14/23100-41920-50300 340601,674.00 07/27/23353633MONTHLY BILLING FOR AUGUST (OFFICE COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH07/14/23100-41920-50300 340604,423.00 07/27/23354346MONTHLY BILLING FOR MANAGED SERVICCOMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH07/14/23100-41920-50300 10,562.00 Total For Check 34060 Check 34061 3406130.00 07/27/23071920232023 SUMMER SOCCER REFEREECOOPER HENSEL07/19/23100-45100-50210 30.00 Total For Check 34061 Check 34062 3406273.71 07/27/23114X92394002OFFICE WATERCULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER06/30/23100-41900-50210 73.71 Total For Check 34062 Check 34063 34063257.70 07/27/23072023ANNUAL INSPECTIONDEHMER FIRE PROTECTION06/30/23100-42100-50400 257.70 Total For Check 34063 Check 34064 340641,965.20 07/27/230515307WATER METERSFERGUSON WATERWORKS #251807/14/23422-49400-50210 1,965.20 Total For Check 34064 Check 34065 34065120.00 07/27/2318643TRANSLATION SERVICES GBR INTERPRETING & TRANSLATI07/12/23100-00000-22205-130 34065100.00 07/27/2318609TRANSLATION SERVICESGBR INTERPRETING & TRANSLATI07/07/23100-00000-22205-130 220.00 Total For Check 34065 Check 34066 34066193.72 07/27/233060316JUNE 2023 SUPPORT SERVICESGOPHER STATE ONE CALL06/30/23601-49400-50380 34066193.73 07/27/233060316JUNE 2023 SUPPORT SERVICESGOPHER STATE ONE CALL06/30/23602-49450-50380 387.45 Total For Check 34066 Check 34067 34067482.90 07/27/2333659300MEMORIAL GARDEN PLANTSGROVE NURSERY07/07/23415-45200-50210 482.90 Total For Check 34067 Check 34068 34068144.00 07/27/231000209121JAIL CHARGESHENN CO SHERIFF07/07/23100-42100-50305 144.00 Total For Check 34068 Check 34069 340692.50 07/27/231000209342VIEW RECORDED DOCUMENTSHENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS REC07/07/23100-42400-50300 2.50 Total For Check 34069 Check 34070 340701,477.97 07/27/231000208790PD RADIO FLEET/MESB FEE AND CAD BIHENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH07/03/23100-42100-50323 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 4/9Page: 07/21/2023 10:18 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 07/14/2023 - 07/27/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 34070 34070323.88 07/27/231000208857PW RADIO FLEET/MESB FEEHENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH07/03/23100-43100-50323 1,801.85 Total For Check 34070 Check 34071 3407195.00 07/27/23003401072300JUNE 2023 CAR WASHHOLIDAY COMPANIES07/01/23100-42100-50403 95.00 Total For Check 34071 Check 34072 34072500.00 07/27/2331832023 IACP ANNUAL CONFERENCE REGISTIACP07/10/23100-42100-50207 500.00 Total For Check 34072 Check 34073 3407375.00 07/27/2307072023BASEBALL COACH REGISTRATION REIMBUJAKE PARSLEY07/07/23100-00000-34790 75.00 Total For Check 34073 Check 34074 34074237.00 07/27/2334552COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS - NEW HORIZONLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-11501 34074209.25 07/27/2334559KARINIEMI JENSEN OSP CONCEPT 23-01LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/18/23100-00000-22205 34074742.75 07/27/2334561CORCORAN STORAGE II 23-016LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/18/23100-00000-22205 34074158.00 07/27/2334562LEUER SKETCH PLAN 23-013LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/18/23100-00000-22205 34074197.50 07/27/2334563PET BARN CPA, PZ, PP, CUP, SP 23-0LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/18/23100-00000-22205 34074158.00 07/27/2334565KWIK TRIP CUP 23-006LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/18/23100-00000-22205 3407439.50 07/27/2334567KARINIEMI WICHT SKETCH PLAN 23-004LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/18/23100-00000-22205 34074864.00 07/27/2334568BASS LAKE CROSSING FP, FPUD AND DA LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-009 34074533.50 07/27/2334539BASS LAKE CROSSING 2ND FP/FINAL PULANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-009 34074700.50 07/27/2334536BASS LAKE ESTATES FP & FINAL PUD 1LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-011 3407439.50 07/27/2334551WESTSIDE TIRE CAR, SP & IUP CITY FLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-012 34074829.50 07/27/2334553COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS FP AND FPUD 21LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-017 34074153.00 07/27/2334566COOK LAKE PUD AMENDMENT CONCEPT 23LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-017 3407439.50 07/27/2334545TAVERA FP & FPUD 20-042LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-056 34074159.00 07/27/2334549TAVERA 5TH FP AND FPUD 22-068LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-056 34074609.75 07/27/2334554TAVERA 3RD ADDITION FP & FPUD PROJLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-056 34074557.75 07/27/2334542RAVINIA 13TH FP & FINAL PUD 19-012LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-058 34074621.50 07/27/2334538RAVINIA 7TH ADDITION FINAL PUD/FINLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-062 3407479.50 07/27/2334569RAVINIA 8TH FP AND PUD 17-003LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-063 34074636.75 07/27/2334543RAVINIA 12TH FINAL PLAT & FINAL PULANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-064 34074451.75 07/27/2334535RAVINIA 9TH FP/FINAL PUD 17-042LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-064 34074476.00 07/27/2334556NAPA CUP & SP CITY FILE 21-004LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-075 34074233.50 07/27/2334547NELSON TRUCKING CUP, SP, VAR 20-02LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-076 3407424.25 07/27/2334541BELLWETHER 3RD FP 19-017LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-087 3407472.75 07/27/2334544BELLWETHER 2ND ADDITION FINAL PLAT LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-087 3407424.25 07/27/2334548BELLWETHER 4TH FP & FPUD 20-002LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-087 3407472.75 07/27/2334546BELLWETHER 5TH FP AND FINAL PUD 20LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-087 34074118.50 07/27/2334540ENCORE FINAL PUD & FP 18-027LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-087 34074807.25 07/27/2334564RUSH CREEK RESERVE 3RD CITY FILE 2LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-098 3407439.50 07/27/2334555SCHERBER CUP AND SP 21-007LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-00000-22205-110 3407439.50 07/27/2334560HACKAMORE AND 116 SKETCH 23-017LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/18/23100-00000-22205-129 34074151.75 07/27/2334550WALCOTT GLEN FP/FPUD 22-036LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/18/23100-00000-22205-132 340745,161.25 07/27/2334558CITY BUSINESSLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-41910-50300 34074170.00 07/27/2334557COD CODE ENFORCEMENTLANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVIC07/13/23100-42401-50300 15,408.75 Total For Check 34074 Check 34075 34075500.00 07/27/2321077WORKER'S COMPENSATION CLAIM #00490LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TR07/18/23100-42100-50365 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 5/9Page: 07/21/2023 10:18 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 07/14/2023 - 07/27/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 34075 500.00 Total For Check 34075 Check 34076 3407630.00 07/27/23071920232023 SUMMER SOCCER REFEREELUCY PENNINGS07/19/23100-45100-50210 30.00 Total For Check 34076 Check 34077 34077309.96 07/27/23060820232ND QUARTER WATER USAGECITY OF MAPLE GROVE07/12/23601-49400-50310 309.96 Total For Check 34077 Check 34078 34078135,617.00 07/27/230720232ND QTR 2023 MAPLE GROVE WATER CONCITY OF MAPLE GROVE07/19/23601-00000-20800 340782,337.00 07/27/230720232ND QTR 2023 MAPLE GROVE WATER CONCITY OF MAPLE GROVE07/19/23601-49400-50310 137,954.00 Total For Check 34078 Check 34079 34079472.32 07/27/236441CLEAN UP DAY, ELECTRONICS - TV/CRTMAXIMUM RECYCLING LLC05/10/23100-43201-50210 472.32 Total For Check 34079 Check 34080 340805.98 07/27/2319003CABLE TIESMENARDS MAPLE GROVE06/29/23100-45100-50210 340809.99 07/27/2319292WEEDER/MIRACLE GROW LEATHER GLOVESMENARDS MAPLE GROVE07/05/23100-45100-50210 3408014.98 07/27/2319292WEEDER/MIRACLE GROW LEATHER GLOVESMENARDS MAPLE GROVE07/05/23100-45100-50417 340806.99 07/27/2318910MIXERMENARDS MAPLE GROVE06/27/23100-45200-50210 3408077.06 07/27/2317869VINYL TUBING/BATTERIESMENARDS MAPLE GROVE06/06/23100-45200-50210 340805.49 07/27/2317877HOSE CLAMPMENARDS MAPLE GROVE06/06/23100-45200-50210 120.49 Total For Check 34080 Check 34081 340814,700.00 07/27/23715140' CONTAINER CUBEMID MINNESOTA STORAGE07/11/23100-43100-50225 4,700.00 Total For Check 34081 Check 34082 3408218,046.09 07/27/2306_2023Q2 2023 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGEMN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY07/19/23100-00000-20802 18,046.09 Total For Check 34082 Check 34083 340831,133.94 07/27/23Q2-20232023 2ND QUARTER UNEMPLOYMENT BENEMN UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE07/10/23100-43100-50140 1,133.94 Total For Check 34083 Check 34084 34084188.71 07/27/231411022449EVIDENCE LIBRARY / ANNUAL DEVICE LMOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC07/12/23100-41920-50210 3408483.25 07/27/238281670476APX VEHICLE CHARGERMOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC07/17/23416-42100-50210 271.96 Total For Check 34084 Check 34085 3408541.94 07/27/23483859MOTOR OILNAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran07/18/23100-42100-50220 41.94 Total For Check 34085 Check 34086 34086625.00 07/27/2351987407COPPER SUL CRYSNUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.07/10/23100-45200-50221 625.00 Total For Check 34086 Check 34087 34087937.00 07/27/23235810CLEAN UP DAY MATTRESS/BOX SPRINGRECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC05/26/23100-43201-50210 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 6/9Page: 07/21/2023 10:18 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 07/14/2023 - 07/27/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 34087 937.00 Total For Check 34087 Check 34088 34088253.82 07/27/230894-006289122CITY HALL GARBAGE JUNE 2023REPUBLIC SERVICES06/30/23100-41900-50380 34088222.58 07/27/230894-006289992PUBLIC WORKS GARBAGE JUNE 2023REPUBLIC SERVICES06/30/23100-43100-50380 34088872.09 07/27/230894-006284803CITY RECYCLING JUNE 2023REPUBLIC SERVICES06/30/23100-43201-50300 3408868.33 07/27/230894-006291199WILDFLOWER PARK GARBAGE JUNE 2023REPUBLIC SERVICES06/30/23100-45200-50380 34088105.75 07/27/230894-006288961CITY PARK GARBAGE JUNE 2023REPUBLIC SERVICES06/30/23100-45200-50380 1,522.57 Total For Check 34088 Check 34089 3408930.00 07/27/23071920232023 SUMMER SOCCER REFEREERILEY FREED07/19/23100-45100-50210 30.00 Total For Check 34089 Check 34090 340902,356.00 07/27/23071320232023 SOCCER SHIRTS SANDI'S SCREEN PRINTING07/13/23100-45100-50210 34090159.00 07/27/2307172023NIGHT TO UNITE EMPLOYEE SHIRTSSANDI'S SCREEN PRINTING07/17/23202-42100-50210 2,515.00 Total For Check 34090 Check 34091 3409155.60 07/27/232101157SCHERBER COUNTY ROAD 30STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205 340913,760.30 07/27/232101158KWIK TRIP CO RD 101STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205 3409187.00 07/27/232101160REFUGE AT RUSH CREEK WETLAND BANKSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205 340915,535.50 07/27/232101168WCA ESCROWSSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205 3409112,623.38 07/27/232101141HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205 340914,236.90 07/27/232101142RED BARN PET RETREATSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205 34091683.00 07/27/232101156KARINIEMI-WICHT DEVELOPMENT PROJECSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205 340911,267.42 07/27/232101154BECHTOLD FARM DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-013 340918,814.98 07/27/232101186COOK LAKE TURN LANESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-017 340913,745.09 07/27/232101134COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT PRSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-017 3409146.80 07/27/232101162D&DSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-024 34091713.08 07/27/232101152KARINIEMI-MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT PROJSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-044 3409113,424.12 07/27/232101135TAVERA DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-056 340915,741.27 07/27/232101132RAVINIA DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-058 34091111.80 07/27/232101161NAPASTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-075 340911,084.00 07/27/232101136NELSON TRUCKING DEVELOPMENT PROJECSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-076 3409123,207.20 07/27/232102046STIEG ROAD IMPROVEMENTSSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/07/23100-00000-22205-087 3409115,853.48 07/27/232101133BELLWETHER DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-087 340916,998.30 07/27/232101139AMBERLY (1,2) BELLWETHER (6,7,9) DSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-087 34091262.50 07/27/232101862RUSH CREEK RESERVE TURN LANESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/07/23100-00000-22205-098 340915,847.39 07/27/232101137RUSH CREEK RESERVE DEVELOPMENT PROSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-098 3409193.60 07/27/232101148GARAGES TOO DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-111 34091148.00 07/27/232101559ST THERESE SENIOR LIVINGSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-117 3409137.99 07/27/23193806199WRIGHT HENNEPIN SUBSTATION IISTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-128 340918,765.88 07/27/232101184CR 116 & HUNTERS RIDGE TURN LANE ISTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-131 340918,939.17 07/27/232101138WALCOTT GLENN DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-00000-22205-132 340911,744.40 07/27/232101860NEW CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-42400-50303 34091512.40 07/27/23193806257HUNTERS RIDGE FEASIBILITY STUDYSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-43170-50300 340912,462.20 07/27/232101178HORSESHOE BEND DRIVESTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-43170-50300 34091293.00 07/27/232101891STORMWATER AREA FEE ASSISTANCESTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/07/23100-43170-50300 3409112,060.70 07/27/232101131GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AND SSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-43170-50300 34091888.00 07/27/232101185ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-43170-50300 34091284.00 07/27/232101168WCA ESCROWSSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-43170-50309 340911,571.00 07/27/232101131GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AND SSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23100-43170-50309 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 7/9Page: 07/21/2023 10:18 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 07/14/2023 - 07/27/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 34091 34091130.00 07/27/23210116666TH STREET DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIOSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23408-48005-50530 340913,414.50 07/27/232101172BRIDGE REPLACEMENT DESIGN - TRAIL STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23408-48009-50303 340915,543.84 07/27/232101921CITY CENTER DR AND 79TH PLACE CONSSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/07/23408-48010-50300 3409151,278.40 07/27/232101180CITY CENTER DR & 79TH PLACE STREETSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23408-48010-50303 3409115,692.20 07/27/232101176WATER SUPPLY, TREATMENT, AND STORASTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23601-00000-16500 34091213.60 07/27/232101177TEST WELL #2STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23601-49400-50300 340918,421.60 07/27/232101183NE CORCORAN WATER SUPPLY TRUNK INFSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23601-49400-50300 340914,554.60 07/27/232101182NE CORCORAN WATER TOWERSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23601-49400-50303 340911,317.07 07/27/232101860NEW CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23601-49400-50303 340911,317.08 07/27/232101860NEW CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES07/06/23602-49450-50303 243,782.34 Total For Check 34091 Check 34092 34092929.19 07/27/2307112023HRA REIMBURSEMENTSTEVE WARREN07/11/23100-00000-21710 929.19 Total For Check 34092 Check 34093 34093584.97 07/27/23I1643025HOLSTERSSTREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT07/06/23100-42100-50417 584.97 Total For Check 34093 Check 34094 34094850.48 07/27/23P92951OSC HUBSWANSTON EQUIP CORP.07/13/23100-43100-50220 850.48 Total For Check 34094 Check 34095 34095566.62 07/27/2352524-00WIRE SNAPPERTERMINAL SUPPLY CO06/28/23100-43100-50210 566.62 Total For Check 34095 Check 34096 3409630.00 07/27/23384967LMC TRAINING - PETERSON/UNGLEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES07/11/23100-41500-50207 3409616.61 07/27/230063BATTERIES FOR RADARHY-VEE 07/07/23100-42100-50210 3409660.00 07/27/23627003SHIFT SCHEDULING MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTFLEETIO07/09/23100-42100-50300 34096300.00 07/27/23C-20231246AMEM ANNUAL CONFERENCE - BURNSASSOC OF MN EMERGENCY MGRS07/18/23100-42151-50207 34096200.00 07/27/2364490700029AMEM 2023 MEMBERSHIP DUES - EKENBEASSOC OF MN EMERGENCY MGRS07/18/23100-42151-50433 34096117.43 07/27/23583181670520089WALMART - DRINKS/WATER FOR EVENTSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES06/30/23201-42100-50210 3409628.18 07/27/230068HAMEL RODEO BAG SUPPLIESHY-VEE 06/22/23201-42100-50210 3409639.00 07/27/23007253HAMEL RODEO PARADE CANDYHY-VEE 07/08/23201-42100-50210 34096756.07 07/27/23145136NIGHT TO UNITE INFLATABLESUSA INFLATABLES07/12/23202-42100-50210 1,547.29 Total For Check 34096 Check 34097 34097210.29 07/27/239938193048PD/CH CELL PHONE 05/27/23-06/26/23VERIZON WIRELESS06/26/23100-41900-50321 34097552.91 07/27/239938193048PD/CH CELL PHONE 05/27/23-06/26/23VERIZON WIRELESS06/26/23100-42100-50321 34097480.16 07/27/239938193048PD/CH CELL PHONE 05/27/23-06/26/23VERIZON WIRELESS06/26/23100-42100-50323 1,243.36 Total For Check 34097 Check 34098 3409836.00 07/27/2380753COLIFORM TESTWATER LABORATORIES, INC. 07/13/23601-49400-50300 36.00 Total For Check 34098 Check 34099 34099250.14 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23100-00000-22205 34099262.46 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23100-00000-22205-007 34099442.60 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23100-00000-22205-056 340991,054.51 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23100-00000-22205-065 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 8/9Page: 07/21/2023 10:18 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 07/14/2023 - 07/27/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 34099 34099422.24 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23100-00000-22205-087 34099204.90 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23100-00000-22205-098 340991,955.35 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23100-41900-50381 3409960.08 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23100-42151-50381 34099196.69 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23100-43100-50381 3409997.64 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23100-45200-50381 3409991.72 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23601-49400-50380 34099225.83 07/27/2335030611723UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT07/10/23602-49450-50380 5,264.16 Total For Check 34099 Check 34100 3410025.81 07/27/238314557659700 CTY RD 19 STREET LIGHTXCEL ENERGY06/07/23100-43100-50381 25.81 Total For Check 34100 Check 34101 3410119.08 07/27/238351281399820 CO RD 101 WATER METERXCEL ENERGY07/05/23601-49400-50381 19.08 Total For Check 34101 Check 34102 3410224.33 07/27/238355176829700 CTY RD 19 STREET LIGHTXCEL ENERGY07/07/23100-43100-50381 24.33 Total For Check 34102 Check 34103 341031,650.00 07/27/2384375COUNCIL CHAMBERS - ZOOM AUDIO TROUZ SYSTEMS, INC06/30/23100-41920-50300 1,650.00 Total For Check 34103 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 9/9Page: 07/21/2023 10:18 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 07/14/2023 - 07/27/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number 245,633.12 Fund 100 GENERAL FUND 184.61 Fund 201 RESERVES DONATION FUND 915.07 Fund 202 CITY COMMUNITY EVENTS 60,366.74 Fund 408 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 482.90 Fund 415 PARK CAPITAL FUND 127.25 Fund 416 CAPITAL-EQUIPMENT CERTS 1,965.20 Fund 422 DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT 197,699.90 Fund 601 WATER 1,736.64 Fund 602 SEWER Fund Totals: 509,111.43 Total For All Funds: City of Corcoran July 27, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-60 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: POLICE OFFICER DECLARATION OF PERA CONTRIBUTIONS DARREN BOHLSEN WHEREAS, the policy of the State of Minnesota as declared in Minnesota Statutes 353.63 is to give special consideration to employees who perform hazardous work and devote their time and skills to protecting the property and personal safety of others; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 353.64 permits governmental subdivisions to request coverage in the Public Employees Police and Fire plan for eligible employees of police departments whose position duties meet the requirements stated therein and listed below. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Corcoran of Hennepin County, MN hereby declares that the position titled Police Officer, currently held by Darren Bohlsen, meets all of the following Police and Fire membership requirements: 1.Said position requires a license by Minnesota peace officer standards and training board under sections 626.84 to 626.863 and this employee is so licensed; 2.Said position’s primary (over 50%) duty is to enforce the general criminal laws of the state; 3.Said position charges this employee with prevention and detection of crime; 4.Said position gives this employee the full power of arrest and 5.Said position is assigned to a designated police or sheriff’s department. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this governing body hereby requests that the above-named employee be accepted as a member of the Public Employees Police and Fire Plan effective the date of this employee’s initial Police and Fire salary deduction by governmental subdivision. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of July, 2023. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Agenda Item: 7c. City of Corcoran July 23,2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-61 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: POLICE OFFICER DECLARATION OF PERA CONTRIBUTIONS LEVI SILJANDER WHEREAS, the policy of the State of Minnesota as declared in Minnesota Statutes 353.63 is to give special consideration to employees who perform hazardous work and devote their time and skills to protecting the property and personal safety of others; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 353.64 permits governmental subdivisions to request coverage in the Public Employees Police and Fire plan for eligible employees of police departments whose position duties meet the requirements stated therein and listed below. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Corcoran of Hennepin County, MN hereby declares that the position titled Police Officer, currently held by Levi Siljander, meets all of the following Police and Fire membership requirements: 1.Said position requires a license by Minnesota peace officer standards and training board under sections 626.84 to 626.863 and this employee is so licensed; 2.Said position’s primary (over 50%) duty is to enforce the general criminal laws of the state; 3.Said position charges this employee with prevention and detection of crime; 4.Said position gives this employee the full power of arrest and 5.Said position is assigned to a designated police or sheriff’s department. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this governing body hereby requests that the above-named employee be accepted as a member of the Public Employees Police and Fire Plan effective the date of this employee’s initial Police and Fire salary deduction by governmental subdivision. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of July, 2023. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Agenda Item: 7d. Page 1 of 4 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7e. City Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Natalie Davis McKeown Topic: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for “Hope Community” (City File No. 22-074) Action Required: Approval Review Deadline: N/A 1. Request Hope Community Church submitted a request to initiate a mandatory EAW for a mixed- use development currently known as “Hope Community.” This development would consist of 738 dwelling units in a variety of housing styles in addition to 4 commercial buildings with a combined area of 110,300 square feet. Project components include construction of 2 market-rate apartment buildings, 2 senior apartment buildings providing a continuum of care, 20 senior single-family homes, 54 townhomes units, 2 smaller commercial buildings anticipated for retail/office use, 2 three-story medical buildings, parking areas, expansion of the Hope Community Church Cemetery, a small playground/tot-lot area, access roads, trail facility, sewer/water utility improvements, and stormwater ponds. The project area is currently utilized for a combination of uses, including Hope Community Church, an accessory daycare to the church, the associated cemetery, a homestead, and agriculture. Additionally, a 1.2-acre parcel within the site was sold to the City for construction of the City’s first water tower. The Minnesota Environmental Review Program rules require a mandatory EAW for new mixed residential and commercial projects of this magnitude. The Council authorized the preparation of the EAW at the January 12, 2023, regular meeting when the concept plan was reviewed. The EAW was ordered for distribution by the Council at the May 25, 2023, meeting. 2. Background Under Minnesota Environmental Review Program rules, the City is the responsible governmental unit (RGU) tasked with preparing the EAW and determining whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects. The purpose of the environmental review process is to provide usable information to the project proposer, government decision-makers, and the public concerning the primary environmental effects of a proposed project. The EAW should identify measures to protect the environment that can later be imposed as conditions of approval in future development applications. Page 2 of 4 After the EAW comment period, if the Council finds that the EAW identifies significant environmental effects that cannot be mitigated or minimized, the City Council would order the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). An EIS does not necessarily disclose more information about potential impacts; but rather, its main purpose is to examine project alternatives and additional mitigative measures to lessen significant impacts identified in the EAW. Very few projects move to the EIS stage because, in most cases, the EAW does an adequate job of describing the potential impacts and identifying mitigative measures. Neither an EAW nor an EIS are a means to approve or deny a project. An EAW and/or EIS are additional sources of information to guide decisions. The statutory standard for requiring an EIS is whether the project may result in significant environmental effects; it is not whether the EAW adequately disclosed information about potential impacts. Accordingly, if Council determines that the EAW does not disclose sufficient information about potential impacts, the Council could request additional information before making a decision on the need for an EIS. In deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects that would warrant the preparation of an EIS, the City Council must consider the following factors (Minnesota Environmental Review Rules, Section 4410.1700, Subpart 7): a.Type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects; b.Cumulative potential effects. The RGU shall consider the following factors: whether the cumulative potential effect is significant, whether the contribution from the project is significant when viewed in connection with other contributions to the cumulative potential effect; the degree to which the project complies with approved mitigation measures specifically designed to address the cumulative potential effect; and the efforts of the proposer to minimize the contributions from the project; c.The extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority. The RGU may rely only on mitigation measures that are specific and can be reasonably expected to effectively mitigate the identified environmental impacts of the project; and d.The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs. The City Council has three courses of action when reviewing and EAW. These actions include: 1.Require additional information to address possible environmental impacts not adequately discussed in the EAW; 2.Make a finding of “no need” for an EIS; or 3.Order an EIS. Page 3 of 4 3.Comments Received on the EAW Section 4410.1600 of the Environmental Rules states that comments received on the EAW shall address the accuracy and completeness of the material, potential environmental impacts that may warrant further investigation before the project is commenced, and the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The 30-day EAW comment period ended on July 6, 2023. The response to the EAW comments was prepared and is attached as the “Record of Decision”. This document includes all written comments submitted by governmental agencies as well as responses to their comments. 4.Public Comment Period The Minnesota EQB advertises the availability of the document, and the City transmits the EAW to a standard list of regional and state agencies for comment. The comment period for an EAW is 30 days. During this time period, the agencies and any member of the general public may comment on the EAW. The 30-day comment period ended on July 6, 2023. Comments submitted during the 30-day period should address the accuracy and completeness of the material contained in the EAW, potential impacts that may warrant further investigation before the project is commenced and the need for an EIS on the proposed project. After the close of the comment period, City staff worked with Stantec and Landform to prepare responses to the comments for review and consideration by the City council. The response is included in the record of decision. The record of decision is intended to serve as the City’s finding of fact of a decision that an EIS does not need to be prepared for this project. The City received seven comment letters from reviewing agencies. Staff notes that two comment letters were received outside of the official comment period but are included in the record of decision with a note the comments were received after July 6, 2023. None of these letters stated that the EAW was inadequate or incomplete or identified the need for the preparation of an EIS. 5.Development Review Process If the City Council declares a finding of “no need” for an EIS, the developer could submit a formal development application that addresses any mitigation strategies identified in the EAW. A formal application for the anticipated Planned Unit Development (PUD) has the following steps in the City entitlement process: 1.Neighborhood meeting. 2.Application for a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning to a PUD, preliminary PUD plan, and preliminary plat. Notice of the public hearing will be Page 4 of 4 sent to landowners within 350 feet of the property, published in the newspaper, and posted on the City website. The public hearing is an opportunity for comment. 3.Final plat and final PUD plan for Phase 1 of the project. Future phases will require final plat and final PUD plan approval. During the formal review process, the City would review and provide recommended changes to the plans submitted by the applicant. This would also start the City work to design any off-site infrastructure improvements that would be needed for this development, including streets and utilities. In addition to the City’s entitlement process, the City will submit a Comprehensive Plan Amendment with the Metropolitan Council for approval and the developer would be required to obtain the permits listed in the EAW. 6. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the resolution declaring a finding of “no need” for an EIS, based on the review of the EAW dated May 18, 2023. Approval of a finding of “no need” for an EIS requires a simple majority vote of the City Council. Attachments: 1.Resolution 2023-63 Declaring a Finding of “No Need” for an Environmental Impact Statement 2.Record of Decision City of Corcoran July 27, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-63 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: RESOLUTION DECLARING A FINDING OF “NO NEED” FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) BASED UPON THE REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMNETAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) FOR “HOPE COMMUNITY” PROPOSED BY HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 30 AND COUNTY ROAD 116 (PIDS 11-119-23-14-0005; 11-119-23-14-0003; 11-119-23-14-0004; and 11-119-23-11-0012) (CITY FILE 22-074) WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for a mixed-use development on July 27, 2023; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Environmental Review Program Rules 4410.4300, Subpart 14, the City of Corcoran, as the responsible governmental unit (RGU) submitted an EAW for the proposed project on May 30, 2023; and WHEREAS, the EAW was published on June 6, 2023, edition of the EQB Monitor, which commenced the required 30-day public comment period that ended on July 6, 2023; and WHEREAS, the RGU received seven comment letters that are incorporated by reference in the Record of Decision and all comments and recommendations received from reviewing agencies and other interested parties have been considered; and WHEREAS, responses were prepared for comment letters received and the response to comments are provided in the Record of Decision; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed project does not present a potential for environmental impacts of such significance that an EIS would be required; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Minnesota Rules, Section 4410.1700, the RGU shall base its decision regarding the need for an EIS on the information gathered during the EAW process, the commenced received on the EAW, and the criteria established by the EQB to determine whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects as provided in the Record of Decision, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does make the Negative Declaration on the need for an EIS for the proposed mixed-use development, based on the Record of Decision, which is hereby approved, adopted, and incorporated herein. Attachment: 7e1. City of Corcoran July 27, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-63 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of July 2023. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk July 14, 2023 1 Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet Notice of Decision Contents Record of Decision ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Response to Comments ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Appendix A: Comments and Letters Received During and After Public Comment Period Appendix B: Appendix Materials Referred to in Response to Comments Appendix C: Resolution Declaring Finding of “No Need” Appendix D: Environmental Assessment Worksheet Attachment: 7e2. Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Record of Decision July 14, 2023 2 Record of Decision Based on the EAW, the Response to Comments and the Findings of Fact, the City of Corcoran City Council concludes the following: 1.All requirements for environmental review of the proposed project have been met. 2.The EAW and the development processes related to the Project have generated information which is adequate to determine whether the Project has the potential for significant environmental effects. 3.Areas where potential environmental effects have been identified have included proper mitigative responses to be included within the final design of the Project. Mitigation will be required to be provided where impacts are expected to result from Project construction, operation or maintenance. Mitigative measures will be required to be incorporated into project design, and have been or will be coordinated with state and federal agencies during the applicable permit process. 4.Based on the criteria in Minnesota Rules part 4410.4300, Subpart 14, the Project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5.An Environmental Impact Statement is not required for the proposed Hope Community Development Project. Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Response to Comments July 14, 2023 3 Response to Comments The Hope Community Development Project mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was approved for distribution to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) and persons and agencies on the official EQB distribution list in accordance with EQB rules on May 23, 2023. The EQB published notice of availability in the EQB Monitor on June 6, 2023. The 30-day comment period ended on July 6, 2023. The City of Corcoran received five EAW comment letters or emails. The letters and emails are on file at the City of Corcoran. The following comment letters were sent to the City of Corcoran: Letter 1: Hennepin County Public Works – Letter dated July 5, 2023 from Ashley Morello, Transportation Planner to Natalie Davis McKeown, City Planner Letter 2: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Letter dated May 5, 2023 from Melissa Collins, Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist, Ecological and Water Resources to Kendra Lindahl, City Planner Letter 3: Metropolitan Council - Letter dated July 6, 2023 from Angela Torres, AICP, Senior Manager, Local Planning Assistance to Natalie Davis McKeown, City Planner Letter 4: Minnesota Department of Agriculture – Email dated June 1, 2023 from Stephan Roos, Environmental Planner, Energy and Environment Section, Agricultural Marketing and Development Division to Natalie Davis McKeown, City Planner Letter 5: US Army Corps of Engineers – Letter dated June 2, 2023 to Natalie Davis McKeown, City Planner Letter 6: Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office – Letter dated July 7, 2023 (received after the close of the 30-day comment period) from Sarah J. Beimers, Environmental Review Program Manager to Natalie Davis McKeown, City Planner Letter 7: Three Rivers Park District – Email dated July 14, 2023 (received after the close of the 30-day comment period) from Stephan Shurson, Landscape Architect to Natalie David McKeown, City Planner. The following information and clarifications are provided in response to all EAW comments received during the 30-day comment period. Comments are provided in italicized text. Letter 1: Hennepin County Public Works Comment 1: General/Site Plan: •The site plan should be updated to depict proposed turn lanes as part of this development and programmed turn lanes in the area. •The county requests 130’ right-of-way (ROW) for CSAH 30 and 120’ ROW for CR 116 to accommodate future trail, drainage and utility needs on these roadways. The final 10’ will be accepted in easement to mitigate any setback concerns. •The county requests 25-by-25-foot triangles at the NW quadrant of the CSAH 30/CR 116 intersection, the NW and SW quadrants of the County Road 116/Hunters Ridge/Oswald Farm Rd intersection, and at the NE and NW quadrants of the CSAH 30/new access intersection to accommodate space for utilities and preserve sight distance. Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Response to Comments July 14, 2023 4 •Development should consider including trail on both CSAH 30 and CR 116. •The proposed regional trail should connect to county roadways intersections and be ADA compliant. •Please note that the turn lane design will need to be reviewed and approved by county staff. •Storm water and drainage discharge rates are to be less than existing flow rates. The county storm water system will not take water from new drainage areas. Documentation will need to be submitted demonstrating that peak stormwater discharge rates remain less than the existing condition. Additional treatments may be necessary if flow rates cannot match existing. •Please inform the developer that all construction within county ROW will require an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Response: Thank you for your comment. Site plans will reflect applicable turn lanes and provide for necessary ROW, including trails. It is noted that Hennepin County will need to review and approve plans for construction within Hennepin County ROW; review and approve turn lane designs; and, review documentation demonstrating that peak stormwater discharge rates remain less than the existing condition. Comment 2: Section 8, Cover Types: •On page 10, Table 3 identifies 1.2 acres of wetlands and shallow lakes (<2 meters deep) for before conditions; MPCA will need to review and approve this during the wetland delineation process. •On page 10, Tables 3 and 4, please review and confirm that there is enough storage for the added impervious surface. NPDES permit requires 1 inch of the runoff from new impervious surface waters to be retained on site using volume and rate reduction. The infiltration sizing calculations and an existing drainage map should be included in the appendix. •On page 10, Table 4, consider other types of green infrastructure to add to the project. •On page 11, Table 5, add the approximate number of trees that will be removed. •On page 11, Table 5, assess whether any mature trees can be retained. Response: Wetland impacts and water storage will be reviewed during the applicable permitting processes. Preliminary infiltration sizing calculations and an existing drainage map, provided by the project proposer, have been provided in Appendix B. This should be considered preliminary information and subject to change as additional geotechnical data is available and coordination occurs with the watershed. Green infrastructure opportunities have and will continue to be encouraged by the City of Corcoran. The project proposer has considered mature tree preservation in planning the proposed project; however, the number of trees to be removed is unknown at this stage. It is anticipated tree removal will occur near the existing home site and as needed to install water infrastructure (i.e., trunk sewer and trunk water main). Comment 3: Section 11, Geology, Soils, and Topography/Land Forms: •On page 15, provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. •On page 15, provide erosion/sedimentation control information related to stormwater runoff. Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Response to Comments July 14, 2023 5 •On page 16, Table 7, the hydrologic soil groups are rated as either C/D. Will the poor soils be amenable to the proposed infiltration ponds? Response: As denoted on page 16 of the EAW, the volumes and acreages of soil excavation and grading are unknown at this time. The developer would consider soil suitability for the infiltration ponds. If required, soils would be excavated and replaced or amended. As denoted on page 22 of the EAW, A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) would be prepared as part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Permit required for the project. The SWPPP would conform to permit requirements and address sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Sediment and erosion control BMPs may include bio-rolls, silt fence, rock construction entrances, inlet protection devices, erosion control blankets, erosion stabilization mats, and/or other similar devices to prevent soil erosion and sediment transport. Disturbed areas specified to be revegetated would be restored with final stabilization per permit requirements. Comment 4: Section 13, Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes •On page 26, consider adding compost disposal. Response: Comment noted. Comment 5: Section 14, Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) •On page 28, review the proposed site plan to consider opportunities to add native plants communities, habitat opportunities for the identified species and promote migratory paths. •On page 32, identify timeline for when the potential effects to the monarch butterfly will be revisited. Response: Regarding opportunities to add native plants, this comment has been noted. Potential effects for monarch butterfly will be revisited when construction plans/timeframes are further refined. Comment 6: Section 18, Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions/ Carbon Footprint: •On page 36, it was assumed that motor vehicles trips are five miles per day, this is too low as average per capita VMT in this area of the county is over 30 miles per day. Response: The five miles per day was an assumed value considering many of the residents will be seniors. If Hennepin County has DOT data to support the 30 miles per day/ per person, the calculation could be rerun. Comment 7: Infrastructure Feasibility Study Section 2.4, Traffic Forecasts •Traffic forecasts need to anticipate traffic twenty years out from the build, should include values for 2048 No-Build and 2048 Build, not 2040. Section 2.5, Traffic Analysis •Provide Synchro reports to better review traffic impacts. County staff may have additional comments after review. •Table 4 and 5, Weekday A.M. Peak hour level of service and weekday P.M. Peak hour level of service results need to provide mitigation measures to address any LOS E or F Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Response to Comments July 14, 2023 6 in the Build scenarios. This includes the eastbound left turn lane, eastbound thru lane, and eastbound right turn lane at County Road 116 and Hunters Ridge/Oswald for the 2040 Build for both A.M. and P.M. peak travel times and the southbound left turn lane at the new access at CSAH 30 for the 2028 and 2040 Build scenarios •Provide tables depicting 95 percent queue for each movement and scenario, similar to the LOS tables 4 and 5. Table should include storage lengths and confirmation that 95 percent queue does not exceed storage Response: In response to the comment regarding Section 2.4: Traffic forecasts were developed using information from the City of Corcoran’s Comprehensive Plan, which includes year 2040 traffic forecasts. Therefore, year 2040 forecasts were deemed most appropriate for this study. In response to bullet 1 of the comment regarding Section 2.5, Synchro reports are attached in Appendix B. In response to bullet 2 of the comment regarding Section 2.5, the operational conditions for the minor street movements are due to the amount of volume on the major street, which results in fewer acceptable gaps in traffic. Review of the 95th percentile vehicle queues for these movements indicates the queues are manageable. These movements will be monitored as the area develops to determine if any modifications are needed in the future. In response to bullet 3 of the comment regarding Section 2.5, the 95th percentile queues are shown in Attachment B, Synchro reports. The 95th percentile maximum queues for all movements are contained within the existing turn lanes. Letter 2: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comment 1: Page 11, Permits and Approvals. Please include a DNR Water Appropriation Permit in the list of required permits and approvals. Given the depth to the surficial water table throughout the project area, it is possible that construction dewatering will be needed during development construction and installation of utilities. Response: Comment noted. Comment 2: Page 19, Groundwater. This section identifies the depth to groundwater as 40 to 85 feet below the surface. The hydrologic soil groups and documented wetlands within the project area indicate there is likely a perched surficial water table present at the site due to the presence of glacial till. Response: Comment noted. Comment 3: Page 20, Wastewater. The proposed plan to add 738 residential units would presumably add a significant number of residential water softeners due to the water hardness levels of the City of Corcoran municipal water supply. Chloride is one of the components of salt, which is used in forms such as sodium chloride (table salt), calcium chloride and magnesium chloride (road salts). Sodium chloride is commonly used in home water softeners and by water treatment plants to treat “hard water”. Minnesota generally has groundwater with high levels of calcium and magnesium that must be removed through softening in order to improve taste and prevent lime scale buildup in appliances, pipes and water fixtures. The majority of home water softeners use sodium chloride (NaCl) in a softening process that replaces calcium and magnesium ions with sodium, while the chloride ions are discharged in the wastewater and eventually end up in the environment. Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Response to Comments July 14, 2023 7 Each community needs to determine which tool is appropriate for their situation. This the Minnesota Pollution Control’s website provides many great resources for cities to use in addressing their high chloride levels. We suggest that as this development moves forward, the City of Corcoran consider what strategies can be used to minimize chloride use. Response: Comment noted. Comment 4: Page 22, Stormwater. We recommend that BWSR-approved, weed-free, native seed mixes be used to the greatest degree possible in project landscaping and stormwater features in order to provide pollinator habitat. Response: Comment noted. Comment 5: Page 22, Stormwater. The planned increase in impervious surfaces will also increase the amount of road salt used in the project area. Chloride released into local lakes and streams does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, potentially reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Consider promoting local business and city participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. There are a variety of classes available for road applicators, sidewalk applicators, and property managers. More information and resources can be found at this website. Many winter maintenance staff who have attended the Smart Salting training - both from cities and counties and from private companies - have used their knowledge to reduce salt use and save money for their organizations. We also encourage cities and counties to consider how they may participate in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan and provide public outreach to reduce the overuse of chloride. Here are some educational resources for residents as well as a sample ordinance regarding chloride use. Response: Comment noted. Comment 6: Page 22, Water Appropriation. This section does not address potential dewatering. Please note that any construction dewatering that is anticipated to exceed 10,000 gallons of water per day or one million gallons per year requires a water use (appropriation) permit from the DNR. Response: Comment noted. Comment 7: Page 27, Rare Features. The loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), a state- listed endangered bird, has been documented in the vicinity of the project site. Loggerhead shrikes use grasslands that contain short grass and scattered perching sites such as hedgerows, shrubs, or small trees. They can be found in native prairie, pastures, shelterbelts, old fields or orchards, cemeteries, grassy roadsides, and farmyards. Minnesota’s Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit the take of endangered or threatened plants or animals, including their parts or seeds, without a permit. Given the potential for this species to be found in the vicinity of the project, tree and shrub removal is required to be avoided during the breeding season, April through July. If you cannot avoid tree removal during loggerhead shrike breeding period, a qualified surveyor needs to conduct a survey for active nests before any trees or shrubs will be removed. Surveys must follow the standards contained in the Rare Species Survey Process. Survey results should be sent to the NH Review Team at Reports.NHIS@state.mn.us. The list of approved DNR Animal Surveyors is included with this Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Response to Comments July 14, 2023 8 comment letter. Project planning should take into account that the survey needs to be conducted during the appropriate time of the year, which may be limited. Response: Comment noted. Comment 8: Page 34, Dust and Odors. If water for dust control is taken from a for dust control is taken from a lake, river, or stream in volumes that exceed 10,000 gallons per day, or one million gallons per year, then a DNR Water Appropriations Permit will be required. Please do not use products containing chloride for dust suppression in areas that drain to public waters. Response: Comment noted. Letter 3: Metropolitan Council Comment 1: Item 6. Project Description (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) The development proposal includes 738 housing units (mainly in multifamily buildings) and up to 110,300 square feet of commercial, retail, and medical office space. Council staff advise that a communitywide forecast adjustment may be needed. Council and City staff can discuss this at the time of the next comprehensive plan amendment. Corcoran is forecasted to gain +1,400 households in the current decade. Considering recent project completions and projects underway, half of this expected growth is previously accounted for. The Hope Community Development is likely to advance Corcoran beyond 3,600 households (the 2030 forecast) in advance of 2030. Also, Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) allocations will need to be updated. TAZ allocations have been prepared by City of Corcoran. The Hope Community site is a small part of TAZ #786. Minimal growth was anticipated in this area. The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan expects TAZ #786 to gain +15 jobs, +12 households and no population during 2020-40. These expectations will need revision to account for the Hope Community Development proposal. Response: Comment noted. Comment 2: Item 10. Land Use (Freya Thamman 651-602-1750, Colin Kelly 651-602-1361) The EAW indicates that the project area is guided Public/Institutional and Mixed Use in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. It indicates that the Public/Institutional guiding includes the existing church and cemetery, and the remaining project area is guided Mixed Use. Some of the planned residential areas are located within the areas guided Public/Institution, which would require a comprehensive plan amendment. The mixed-use neighborhood includes a variety of housing options, including age-restricted housing and two senior apartment buildings providing a continuum of care. When considering units per acre and allowed residential density ranges shown in the comprehensive plan, please refer to the most recent guidelines on senior housing for housing units and group quarters, which reflect the current Census Bureau definitions: https://metrocouncil.org/Handbook/Files/Resources/Fact-Sheet/LAND-USE/Housing-Unit-vs- Group-Quarter.aspx. Regional Trails Diamond Lake Regional Trail is planned to traverse the site east to west. The EAW acknowledges the regional trail in the Land Use section, indicating that: “Three Rivers Park District plans show a portion of the proposed Diamond Lake Regional Trail may be located Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Response to Comments July 14, 2023 9 through the center of the site.” In discussing the project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans, the EAW states “the plans may need to be revised to accommodate Three Rivers Park District’s adopted plan for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail.” Prior to any construction activities, the developer should coordinate with Three Rivers Park District, the Regional Park Implementing Agency that will own and operate the future Diamond Lake Regional Trail. The final design for the mixed-use neighborhood must accommodate the planned regional trail. Response: Comment noted. Comment 3: Item 12. Water Resources – Wastewater (Roger Janzig, 651-602-1119) The Metropolitan Disposal System has adequate capacity for this project location. Response: Comment noted. Comment 4: Item 12. Water Resources – Water Supply (John Clark, 651-602-1452) The following comments are offered for water supply: •At present, the water that will be used to supply this development has not been appropriated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR). Water supply treatment and well infrastructure are being developed by the community. Water availability and potential impacts to aquifers, nearby infrastructure, and ecosystems will need to be assessed by the regulating agency to understand if local aquifers will be able to meet the community’s water demands. •Specific water demand estimates for the residential and non-residential portions of the development would benefit the project planning, inform the community’s local water supply planning, and help to determine potential resource needs and environmental impacts. •Local water supply plans are an essential part of the community’s comprehensive plan. If the community’s local water supply plan has been updated and approved by the MN DNR as a part of the request for water supply wells and water appropriation permits, please provide that updated plan to the Metropolitan Council as supplemental information or as part of a comprehensive plan amendment. •Wells that have been identified on site, that will no longer be used, should be sealed according to Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) standards and guidance, with appropriate updates to the Minnesota Well Index. •Lawn and landscaping will comprise approximately 20 acres of the new development as proposed. It is likely that much of these 20 acres will be irrigated. Inefficient irrigation of lawns and landscaping using treated municipal water is one of the major drivers of infrastructure expansions for public water supplies, and can unnecessarily stress water resources, particularly during periods of drought. Captured stormwater on site could be used for landscape irrigation as an alternative to treated municipal sources. Additionally, ensuring that installed irrigation systems are using real-time weather data, via “smart” irrigation controllers, include soil moisture sensors, and are regularly audited for leaks and other equipment malfunctions, can help the systems to use only the water necessary for maintaining lawn and landscaped areas. Water efficient turfgrass and landscaping species can also help to lessen water needs on site. The University of Minnesota extension has excellent information that can help developers to choose and install species that require less nutrient and water inputs, lowering maintenance costs, and recover well from drought-stress. Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Response to Comments July 14, 2023 10 Response: Comment noted. Comment 5: Item 20. Transportation – Transit (Victoria Dan, 651-349-7648) The EAW correctly states that there are no transit routes in the project area (Corcoran is outside the Transit Capital Levy District and therefore does not receive fixed route service). However, alternative transportation is available on Transit Link, a general public dial-a-ride service provided by the Metropolitan Council. Response: Comments noted. Letter 4: Minnesota Department of Agriculture Comment 1: After reviewing the document I have determined that, although there is permanent conversion of agricultural lands, this project converts land that is within the MUSA line and is in keeping with your current comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. We have no further comments. Response: Comment noted. Letter 5: Department of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District Comment 1: We have received your submittal described below. You may contact the Project Manager with questions regarding the evaluation process. The Project Manager may request additional information necessary to evaluate your submittal. Response: Comment noted. Letter 6: Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Comment 1: Due to the nature and location of the proposed project, we recommend that a Phase IA literature search and archaeological assessment be completed by a qualified archaeologist to assess the potential for intact archaeological sites in the project area. If, as a result of this assessment, a Phase I archaeological survey is recommended, this survey should be completed. The survey must meet the requirements of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification and Evaluation and should include an evaluation of National Register eligibility for any properties that are identified. Response: Comment noted. The majority of the site has been actively farmed, and portions of the site have been disturbed for the construction of Hope Community Church and the City’s first water tower. The City is unaware of any historical information or records at the City that would suggest a Phase I survey is warranted on the Project site. If SHPO has information to suggest the location of the proposed project warrants an investigation, the City would request that information be provided. Comment 2: We will reconsider the need for survey if the project area can be documented as previously surveyed or disturbed. Any previous survey work must meet contemporary standards. Note: plowed areas and right-of-way are not automatically considered disturbed. Archaeological sites can remain intact beneath deposited fill, plow zones, and other recent disturbances. Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Response to Comments July 14, 2023 11 Response: Comment noted. Based on the available data, the City and Project Proposer do not believe an archaeological survey is necessary. If SHPO has any information that would suggest investigation of the site is warranted, the City would request that the information be provided. Letter 7: Three Rivers Park District Comment 1: As mentioned in the Land Use chapter, (Section 10. a. ii.), a portion of the Three Rivers Park District’s Diamond Lake Regional Trail (DLRT) is planned through the site, crossing CSAH 116 at Hunters Ridge and extending west and eventually south, crossing CSAH 30 at a location yet to be determined. Response: Comment noted. A proposed trail alignment is shown on the concept plan. Comment 2: Development plans should dedicate sufficient right-of-way to accommodate the future trail in accordance with Three Rivers Regional Trail Design Standards. Generally speaking, a minimum 16’ to 20’ wide corridor is required to accommodate a 10’ wide paved bituminous trail, two 3’ wide clearzones on either side of the trail and room for trail/road signage. If possible, a wider corridor than this is preferred in order to be able to provide a vegetative buffer between the trail and the surrounding development which will contribute to a more attractive and higher quality user experience. Response: Comment noted. The City requires a 20-foot easement for trails and will be required as the project moves forward. Comment 3: Though an exact alignment for the DLRT to east of the site is not yet determined, it seems more likely that it will be on the north side of Hunters Ridge. Therefore, locating the trail on the north side of Hope Way is preferred. Consideration should be given to the location of any entrance sign for the development along the north side of Hope Way so it does not interfere with the trail right-of-way area. Response: Comment noted. City staff believe the trail is better suited for the south side of Hope Way as shown on the concept plan to minimize the crossing of driveways as well as avoiding an additional road crossing at Hope Way when this road is eventually extended to the west. The project proposer will work with the City and Three Rivers Park District to finalize the trail location. Comment 4: Providing a safe crossing of CSAH 116 at Hunters Ridge was identified in the adopted DLRT Master Plan. Given the expected increase of traffic along CSAH 116 in the future, a grade-separated crossing for the trail at this intersection is proposed in the master plan. A trail underpass under CSAH 116 seems more feasible than a trail bridge. Trail development for the DLRT is many years out in the future, but consideration should be made to provide significant right-of-way for a future grade-separated crossing and an accessible approach to an underpass. Response: Comment noted. The City looks forward to working with Three Rivers Park District to understand the District’s land needs for the grade-separated crossing and to determine the appropriate means to acquire this land. Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Comments and Letters July 14, 2023 12 Appendix A: Comments and Letters Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340 612-596-0300 | hennepin.us July 5, 2023 Natalie Davis McKeown City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Re: Hope Community Mixed-Use Development EAW Ms. Davis McKeown: Please consider the following county staff comments regarding the EAW for the Hope Community mixed-use development at County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 30 and County Road (CR) 116. General/Site Plan - The site plan should be updated to depict proposed turn lanes as part of this development and programmed turn lanes in the area. - The county requests 130’ right-of-way (ROW) for CSAH 30 and 120’ ROW for CR 116 to accommodate future trail, drainage and utility needs on these roadways. The final 10’ will be accepted in easement to mitigate any setback concerns. - The county requests 25-by-25-foot triangles at the NW quadrant of the CSAH 30/CR 116 intersection, the NW and SW quadrants of the County Road 116/Hunters Ridge/Oswald Farm Rd intersection, and at the NE and NW quadrants of the CSAH 30/new access intersection to accommodate space for utilities and preserve sight distance. - Development should consider including trail on both CSAH 30 and CR 116. - The proposed regional trail should connect to county roadways intersections and be ADA compliant. - Please note that the turn lane design will need to be reviewed and approved by county staff. - Storm water and drainage discharge rates are to be less than existing flow rates. The county storm water system will not take water from new drainage areas. Documentation will need to be submitted demonstrating that peak stormwater discharge rates remain less than the existing condition. Additional treatments may be necessary if flow rates cannot match existing. - Please inform the developer that all construction within county ROW will require an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Section 8, Cover Types - On page 10, Table 3 identifies 1.2 acres of wetlands and shallow lakes (<2 meters deep) for before conditions; MPCA will need to review and approve this during the wetland delineation process. - On page 10, Tables 3 and 4, please review and confirm that there is enough storage for the added impervious surface. NPDES permit requires 1 inch of the runoff from new impervious surface waters to be retained on site using volume and rate reduction. The infiltration sizing calculations and an existing drainage map should be included in the appendix. - On page 10, Table 4, consider other types of green infrastructure to add to the project. - On page 11, Table 5, add the approximate number of trees that will be removed. - On page 11, Table 5, assess whether any mature trees can be retained. Section 11, Geology, Soils, and Topography/Land Forms - On page 15, provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. - On page 15, provide erosion/sedimentation control information related to stormwater runoff. - On page 16, Table 7, the hydrologic soil groups are rated as either C/D. Will the poor soils be amenable to the proposed infiltration ponds? Section 12, Water Resources - On page 17, the surface waters section indicates that no county ditches are within the project area. County staff determines that county ditches and pertinent ROW will be impacted. - On page 18, Table 10, the project will be required to adhere to specific regulations, including limits on TMDL, TSS and TP. A mitigation plan will need to be drafted, which should include a map depicting existing and proposed drainage. - On page 21, provide additional requirements for special/impaired waters. - On page 22, review MPCA regulations for discharge into Wetlands 2 and 3. - On page 22, confirm whether there are any temporary infiltration basins during construction. This may trigger additional MPCA regulations. - On page 22, review and confirm that 17.3 acres of impervious surface will be added to the project area. After reviewing the site plan (Figure 3, Appendix A), this estimate seems low. Section 13, Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes - On page 26, consider adding compost disposal. Section 14, Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) - On page 28, review the proposed site plan to consider opportunities to add native plants communities, habitat opportunities for the identified species and promote migratory paths. - On page 32, identify timeline for when the potential effects to the monarch butterfly will be revisited. Section 18, Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions/ Carbon Footprint - On page 36, it was assumed that motor vehicles trips are five miles per day, this is too low as average per capita VMT in this area of the county is over 30 miles per day. Infrastructure Feasibility Study Section 2.4, Traffic Forecasts o Traffic forecasts need to anticipate traffic twenty years out from the build, should include values for 2048 No-Build and 2048 Build, not 2040. Section 2.5, Traffic Analysis o Provide Synchro reports to better review traffic impacts. County staff may have additional comments after review. o Table 4 and 5, Weekday A.M. Peak hour level of service and weekday P.M. Peak hour level of service results need to provide mitigation measures to address any LOS E or F in the Build scenarios. This includes the eastbound left turn lane, eastbound thru lane, and eastbound right turn lane at County Road 116 and Hunters Ridge/Oswald for the 2040 Build for both A.M. and P.M. peak travel times and the southbound left turn lane at the new access at CSAH 30 for the 2028 and 2040 Build scenarios o Provide tables depicting 95 percent queue for each movement and scenario, similar to the LOS tables 4 and 5. Table should include storage lengths and confirmation that 95 percent queue does not exceed storage Please contact me at 612-596-0359, ashley.morello@hennepin.us for any further discussion of these items. Sincerely, Ashley Morello Transportation Planner Hennepin County Public Works 1 Division of Ecological and Water Resources Transmitted by Email Region 3 Headquarters 1200 Warner Road Saint Paul, MN 55106 July 3, 2023 Natalie Davis McKeown, Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Dear Natalie Davis McKeown, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Hope Community Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) in Hennepin County. The DNR respectfully submits the following comments for your consideration: 1. Page 11, Permits and Approvals. Please include a DNR Water Appropriation Permit in the list of required permits and approvals. Given the depth to the surficial water table throughout the project area, it is possible that construction dewatering will be needed during development construction and installation of utilities. 2. Page 19, Groundwater. This section identifies the depth to groundwater as 40 to 85 feet below the surface. The hydrologic soil groups and documented wetlands within the project area indicate there is likely a perched surficial water table present at the site due to the presence of glacial till. 3. Page 20, Wastewater. The proposed plan to add 738 residential units would presumably add a significant number of residential water softeners due to the water hardness levels of the City of Corcoran municipal water supply. Chloride is one of the components of salt, which is used in forms such as sodium chloride (table salt), calcium chloride and magnesium chloride (road salts). Sodium chloride is commonly used in home water softeners and by water treatment plants to treat “hard” water. Minnesota generally has groundwater with high levels of calcium and magnesium that must be removed through softening in order to improve taste and prevent lime scale buildup in appliances, pipes and water fixtures. The majority of home water softeners use sodium chloride (NaCl) in a softening process that replaces calcium and magnesium ions with sodium, while the chloride ions are discharged in the wastewater and eventually end up in the environment. Each community needs to determine which tool is appropriate for their situation. This website suggests ways for homeowners to optimize their water softener salt use, while the Minnesota Pollution Control’s website provides many great resources for cities to use in addressing their 2 high chloride levels. We suggest that as this development moves forward, the City of Corcoran consider what strategies can be used to minimize chloride use. 4. Page 22, Stormwater. We recommend that BWSR-approved, weed-free, native seed mixes be used to the greatest degree possible in project landscaping and stormwater features in order to provide pollinator habitat. 5. Page 22, Stormwater. The planned increase in impervious surfaces will also increase the amount of road salt used in the project area. Chloride released into local lakes and streams does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, potentially reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Consider promoting local business and city participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. There are a variety of classes available for road applicators, sidewalk applicators, and property managers. More information and resources can be found at this website. Many winter maintenance staff who have attended the Smart Salting training — both from cities and counties and from private companies — have used their knowledge to reduce salt use and save money for their organizations. We also encourage cities and counties to consider how they may participate in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan and provide public outreach to reduce the overuse of chloride. Here are some educational resources for residents as well as a sample ordinance regarding chloride use. 6. Page 22, Water Appropriation. This section does not address potential dewatering. Please note that any construction dewatering that is anticipated to exceed 10,000 gallons of water per day or one million gallons per year requires a water use (appropriation) permit from the DNR. 7. Page 27, Rare Features. The loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), a state-listed endangered bird, has been documented in the vicinity of the project site. Loggerhead shrikes use grasslands that contain short grass and scattered perching sites such as hedgerows, shrubs, or small trees. They can be found in native prairie, pastures, shelterbelts, old fields or orchards, cemeteries, grassy roadsides, and farmyards. Minnesota’s Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit the take of endangered or threatened plants or animals, including their parts or seeds, without a permit. Given the potential for this species to be found in the vicinity of the project, tree and shrub removal is required to be avoided during the breeding season, April through July. If you cannot avoid tree removal during loggerhead shrike breeding period, a qualified surveyor needs to conduct a survey for active nests before any trees or shrubs will be removed. Surveys must follow the standards contained in the Rare Species Survey Process. Survey results should be sent to the NH Review Team at Reports.NHIS@state.mn.us. The list of approved DNR Animal Surveyors is included with this comment letter. Project planning should take into account that the survey needs to be conducted during the appropriate time of the year, which may be limited. 8. Page 34, Dust and Odors. If water for dust control is taken from a lake, river, or stream in volumes that exceed 10,000 gallons per day, or one million gallons per year, then a DNR Water Appropriations Permit will be required. Please do not use products containing chloride for dust suppression in areas that drain to public waters. 3 Thank you again for the opportunity to review this document. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Melissa Collins Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist | Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Phone: 651-259-5755 Email: melissa.collins@state.mn.us CC: Josh McKinney, Project Manager Equal Opportunity Employer Metropolitan Council (Regional Office & Environmental Services) 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P 651.602.1000 | F 651.602.1550 | TTY 651.291.0904 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer July 6, 2023 Natalie Davis McKeown, City Planner City of Corcoran 19951 Oswald Farm Road Corcoran, MN 55374 RE: City of Corcoran - Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) – Hope Community Mixed Use Development Metropolitan Council Review 22873-1 Metropolitan Council District 1 Dear Natalie Davis: The Metropolitan Council received the EAW for the Hope Community Mixed Use Development in Corcoran on May 30, 2023. The proposed development consists of 44.5 acres centering around 12 acres of existing development located on the northwest corner of County Road (CR) 116 and CR 30. The existing development includes Hope Community Church, daycare within the church, cemetery, and the City’s first water tower (under development). Hope Community Church proposes a mixed-use neighborhood with housing options, including age-restricted and market rate housing, as well as medical office and retail/commercial uses. The proposed development would create a campus that provides housing, particularly for seniors, and a community center with commercial and medical uses. The staff review finds that the EAW is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and does not raise major issues of consistency with Council policies. An Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for regional purposes. We offer the following comments for your consideration. Item 6. Project Description (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) The development proposal includes 738 housing units (mainly in multifamily buildings) and up to 110,300 square feet of commercial, retail, and medical office space. Council staff advise that a communitywide forecast adjustment may be needed. Council and City staff can discuss this at the time of the next comprehensive plan amendment. Corcoran is forecasted to gain +1,400 households in the current decade. Considering recent project completions and projects underway, half of this expected growth is previously accounted for. The Hope Community Development is likely to advance Corcoran beyond 3,600 households (the 2030 forecast) in advance of 2030. Also, Traf fic Analysis Zone (TAZ) allocations will need to be updated. TAZ allocations have been prepared by City of Corcoran. The Hope Community site is a small part of TAZ #786. Minimal growth was anticipated in this area. The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan expects TAZ #786 to gain +15 jobs, +12 households and no population during 2020-40. These expectations will need revision to account for the Hope Community Development proposal. Page - 2 | July 5, 2023 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Item 10. Land Use (Freya Thamman 651-602-1750, Colin Kelly 651-602-1361) The EAW indicates that the project area is guided Public/Institutional and Mixed Use in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. It indicates that the Public/Institutional guiding includes the existing church and cemetery, and the remaining project area is guided Mixed Use. Some of the planned residential areas are located within the areas guided Public/Institution, which would require a comprehensive plan amendment. The mixed -use neighborhood includes a variety of housing options, including age-restricted housing and two senior apartment buildings providing a continuum of care. When considering units per acre and allowed residential density ranges shown in the comprehensive plan, please refer to the most recent guidelines on senior housing for housing units and group quarters, which reflect the current Census Bureau definitions: https://metrocouncil.org/Handbook/Files/Resources/Fact -Sheet/LAND-USE/Housing-Unit-vs- Group-Quarter.aspx. Regional Trails Diamond Lake Regional Trail is planned to traverse the site east to west. The EAW acknowledges the regional trail in the Land Use section, indicating that: “Three Rivers Park District plans show a portion of the proposed Diamond Lake Regional Trail may be located through the center of the site.” In discussing the project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans, the EAW states “the plans may need to be revised to accommodate Three Rivers Park District’s adopted plan for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail.” Prior to any construction activities, the developer should coordinate with Three Rivers Park District, the Regional Park Implementing Agency that will own and operate the future Diamond Lake Regional Trail. The final design for the mixed-use neighborhood must accommodate the planned regional trail. Item 1 2. Water Resources – Wastewater (Roger Janzig, 651-602-1119) The Metropolitan Disposal System has adequate capacity for this project location. Item 12. Water Resources – Water Supply (John Clark, 651-602-1452) The following comments are offered for water supply: • At present, the water that will be used to supply this development has not been appropriated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR). Water supply treatment and well infrastructure are being developed by the community. Water availability and potential impacts to aquifers, nearby infrastructure, and ecosystems will need to be assessed by the regulating agency to understand if local aquifers will be able to meet the community’s water demands. • Specific water demand estimates for the residential and non-residential portions of the development would benefit the project planning, inform the community’s local water supply planning, and help to determine potential resource needs and environmental impacts. • Local water supply plans are an essential part of the community’s comprehensive plan. If the community’s local water supply plan has been updated and approved by the MN DNR as a part of the request for water supply wells and water appropriation permits, please provide that updated plan to the Metropolitan Council as supplemental information or as part of a comprehensive plan amendment. • Wells that have been identified on site, that will no longer be used, should be sealed according to Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) standards and guidance, with appropriate updates to the Minnesota Well Index. • Lawn and landscaping will comprise approximately 20 acres of the new development as proposed. It is likely that much of these 20 acres will be irrigated. Inefficient irrigation of lawns and landscaping using treated municipal water is one of the major drivers of infrastructure expansions for public water supplies, and can unnecessarily stress water resources, Page - 3 | July 5, 2023 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL particularly during periods of drought. Captured stormwater on site could be used for landscape irrigation as an alternative to treated municipal sources. Additionally, ensuring that installed irrigation systems are using real-time weather data, via “smart” irrigation controllers, include soil moisture sensors, and are regularly audited for leaks and other equipment malfunctions, can help the systems to use only the water necessary for maintaining lawn and landscaped areas. Water efficient turfgrass and landscaping species can also help to lessen water needs on site. The University of Minnesota extension has excellent information that can help developers to choose and install species that require less nutrient and water inputs, lowering maintenance costs, and recover well from drought-stress. Item 20. Transportation – Transit (Victoria Dan, 651-349-7648) The EAW correctly states that there are no transit routes in the project area (Corcoran is outside the Transit Capital Levy District and therefore does not receive fixed route service). However, alternative transportation is available on Transit Link, a general public dial-a-ride service provided by the Metropolitan Council. This concludes the Council’s review of the EAW. The Council will not take formal action on the EAW. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Freya Thamman, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1750 or via email at Freya.Thamman @metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Angela R. Torres, AICP, Senior Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT - Metro Division Judy Johnson, Metropolitan Council District 1 Freya Thamman, Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Reviews Coordinator N:\CommDev\LPA\Communities\Corcoran\Letters\Corcoran 2023 Hope Community Church EAW OK w Comments 22873-1_.docx This message was sent from outside of the organization. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source of this email and know the content is safe. From:Roos, Stephan (MDA) To:Natalie Davis Subject:Hope Community Mixed-Use Development EAW Date:Thursday, June 1, 2023 4:06:08 PM Attachments:image001.jpg Hi Natalie, Minnesota Department of Agriculture appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the Hope Community Mixed-Use Development EAW. After reviewing the document I have determined that, although there is permanent conversion of agricultural lands, this project converts land that is within the MUSA line and is in keeping with your current comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. We have no further comments. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on this EAW, Steve Steve Roos Environmental Planner Energy and Environment Section Agricultural Marketing and Development Division Minnesota Department of Agriculture 625 Robert Street North Saint Paul, MN 55155-2538 Ph: 651-201-6631 office www.mda.state.mn.us DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ST. PAUL DISTRICT 332 MINNESOTA STREET, SUITE E1500 ST. PAUL, MN 55101-1323 06/02/2023 Regulatory File No. MVP-2022-01918-RMH THIS IS NOT A PERMIT Natalie Davis McKeown City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 To: Natalie Davis McKeown: We have received your submittal described below. You may contact the Project Manager with questions regarding the evaluation process. The Project Manager may request additional information necessary to evaluate your submittal. File Number: MVP-2022-01918-RMH Applicant: Josh Mckinney Project Name: Hope Community Mixed-Use Development Project Location: Section 11 of Township 119 N, Range 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Latitude: 45.1338228883328; Longitude: -93.5455396670058) Received Date: 05/31/2023 Project Manager: Raelene Hegge (651) 290-5355 Raelene.Hegge@usace.army.mil Additional information about the St. Paul District Regulatory Program can be found on our web site at http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/missions/regulatory. Please note that initiating work in waters of the United States prior to receiving Department of the Army authorization could constitute a violation of Federal law. If you have any questions, please contact the Project Manager. Thank you. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District Regulatory Branch MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 50 Sherburne Avenue ▪ Administration Building 203 ▪ Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 ▪ 651-201-3287 mn.gov/admin/shpo ▪ mnshpo@state.mn.us AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND SERVICE PROVIDER July 7, 2023 Natalie Davis McKeown Planner, City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 RE: Hope Community Mixed-Use Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet City of Corcoran, Hennepin County SHPO Number: 2023-2084 Dear Natalie Davis McKeown: Thank you for providing this office with a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the above - referenced project. Due to the nature and location of the proposed project, we recommend that a Phase I A literature search and archaeological assessment be completed by a qualified archaeologist to assess the potential for intact archaeological sites in the project area. If, as a result of this assessment, a Phase I archaeological survey is recommended, this survey should be completed. The survey must meet the require ments of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification and Evaluation and should include an evaluation of National Register eligibility for any properties that are identified. For a list of consultants who have expressed an interest in undertaking such surveys, please visit the website www.mnhs.org/preservation/directory. To search the directory, use Ctrl + F as a search function and enter “archaeologists” in the text box that pops up. The consultants in these categories will be highlighted; you will need to scroll down to see them all. We will reconsider the need for survey if the project area can be documented as previously surveyed or disturbed. Any previous survey work must meet contemporary standards. Note: plowed areas and right-of-way are not automatically considered disturbed. Archaeological sites can remain intact beneath deposited fill, plow zones, and other recent disturbances. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36 CFR § 800. If this project is considered for federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, then review and consultation with our office will need to be initiated by the lead federal agency. Be advised that comments and recommendations provided by our office for this state -level review may differ from findings and determinations made by the federal agency as part of review and consultation under Section 106. If you have any questions regarding our review of this project, please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson, Environmental Review Program Specialist, at 651-201-3285 or kelly.graggjohnson@state.mn.us. Sincerely, Sarah J. Beimers Environmental Review Program Manager From: Shurson, Stephen <Stephen.Shurson@threeriversparks.org> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2023 8:47 AM To: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Cc: Rexine, Ann <Ann.Rexine@threeriversparks.org>; Grissman, Kelly <Kelly.Grissman@threeriversparks.org> Subject: TRPD comments RE: Hope Community Mixed-Use Development EAW (City File 22-074) Natalie, Below are Three Rivers comments regarding the EAW for the Hope Community Mixed-Use Development. Again, I apologize for the delay in responding to the 30-day comment period. Thank you for your considerations. 1. As mentioned in the Land Use chapter, (Section 10. a. ii.), a portion of the Three Rivers Park District’s Diamond Lake Regional Trail (DLRT) is planned through the site, crossing CSAH 116 at Hunters Ridge and extending west and eventually south, crossing CSAH 30 at a location yet to be determined. 2. Development plans should dedicate sufficient right-of-way to accommodate the future trail in accordance with Three Rivers Regional Trail Design Standards. Generally speaking, a minimum 16’ to 20’ wide corridor is required to accommodate a 10’ wide paved bituminous trail, two 3’ wide clearzones on either side of the trail and room for trail/road signage. If possible, a wider corridor than this is preferred in order to be able to provide a vegetative buffer between the trail and the surrounding development which will contribute to a more attractive and higher quality user experience. 3. Though an exact alignment for the DLRT to east of the site is not yet determined, it seems more likely that it will be on the north side of Hunters Ridge. Therefore, locating the trail on the north side of Hope Way is preferred. Consideration should be given to the location of any entrance sign for the development along the north side of Hope Way so it does not interfere with the trail right-of-way area. 4. Providing a safe crossing of CSAH 116 at Hunters Ridge was identified in the adopted DLRT Master Plan. Given the expected increase of traffic along CSAH 116 in the future, a grade- separated crossing for the trail at this intersection is proposed in the master plan. A trail underpass under CSAH 116 seems more feasible than a trail bridge. Trail development for the DLRT is many years out in the future, but consideration should be made to provide significant right-of-way for a future grade-separated crossing and an accessible approach to an underpass. Stephen Shurson Stef-en Sure•son | he/him Landscape Architect, Three Rivers Park District Office: 763-559-6766 Stephen.Shurson@ThreeRiversParks.org This message was sent from outside of the organization. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source of this email and know the content is safe. Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Resolution Declaring Finding of “No Need” July 14, 2023 13 Appendix B: Appendix Materials Referred to in Response to Comments • Preliminary Infiltration Sizing Calculations and Existing Drainage Map • Synchro Reports • Permits Table Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Resolution Declaring Finding of “No Need” July 14, 2023 14 Preliminary Infiltration Sizing Calculations and Existing Drainage Map COUNTY ROAD NO. 116COUNTY ROAD NO. 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 OSWALD FARM ROAD3030OSWALD FARM ROADOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNTERS RIDG E HUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS R IDGE COUNTY ROAD NO. 116BLOCK 2 LOT 1 OUTLOT A BLOCK 1 LOT 1 10 1010 1 0 10 10 10 1010 10 101010101030 30 3030OUTLOT C 20 1361 953.77 FND IP 24992 1362 948.92 FND IP 24992 1358 953.22 FND IP 1/2" OPEN 1343 951.08 FND IP 1/2" OPEN TIPPED PARCEL 3 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 4 EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23WEST LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23NORTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23 SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23 WEST LINE OF THE NE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23 EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23 FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT FND IP 1/2" OPEN TIPPED FND IP 1/2" OPEN FND IP CAPPED 24992 FND IP CAPPED 24992 30 30 30 30 WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022 WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022 9459 5 09509509469479489 4 99499 4 9 9 5 1 95 2 95395 3 950 95 5 946 947 948 949 951 952 953 954 9 5 6 950950947947948 948949 949951 951952953954954 950950955951951952953954954950955947948949951952953954 9559 5 3 9 5 3 9 5 4 9 5 4 9 5 69509489499519529459469479 4 5 9509 4 2 9 4 3 9 4 4 9 4 69469 4 6 9 4 7947 947 948949940 945 941942 943 944 9 4 6 946947948948945 941 942 943 944 946 94 7 948 9459459459449449469469469 4 7947 945 94 5 946 946947948949945 941 94 2 94 3 944 946 947 94 8 949 945 9 4 2 9439 4 4 946 947 948 9499459 5 0 9429 4 39449 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 94094 5 94194294394 4946 951952952953953952 953 950 947 947 94 8 949 951 952 953 954 950 949 951 952 95395495 4 955 955 954 954 956 956 957 957 953954950 946 947 948 949 951 952 953 9 5 5 9 5 4 9 5 6 9 5 7 945 950 9 4 4 946947 948949 9459509469479489499 5 1 952 952951952 945 950 945940946945 946940 945 946945943954955952950949948 9479469469549539529519509489479 5 1 950950949951945943941944945946947948949943942948 949 9459 4 1 94093 8 9 3 6 937 937 938 940 936 935935 936 937939 948 94995295295 2 953 953 952 952 9539539529519 5 0 949949 950948938935 9369379469489479519509509 5 1 952 950950951952952952954 954 955955953950948952952951951952953954952952953954953953953953952950950953958957956955954953 1E 2E 3E 5E 4E 6E 8E 9E 10E 11E 12E 13E 7E 6P 2P 3P 4P 7P 10P 11P 12P 13P 11E -OS 12E -OS 10E -OS COUNTY ROAD NO. 116COUNTY ROAD NO. 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 OSWALD FARM ROAD3030OSWALD FARM ROADOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNTERS RIDG E HUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS R IDGE COUNTY ROAD NO. 116BLOCK 2 LOT 1 OUTLOT A BLOCK 1 LOT 1 10 1010 1 0 10 10 10 1010 10 10DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PER PLAT OF HOPE PLACE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PER PLAT OF HOPE PLACE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PER PLAT OF HOPE PLACE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PER PLAT OF HOPE PLACE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PER PLAT OF HOPE PLACE10 10101030 30 3030OUTLOT C 20 DRIVEWAY EASEMENT PER DOC NO. 10961288 1361 953.77 FND IP 24992 1362 948.92 FND IP 24992 1358 953.22 FND IP 1/2" OPEN 1343 951.08 FND IP 1/2" OPEN TIPPED PARCEL 3 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 4 EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23WEST LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23NORTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23 SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23 WEST LINE OF THE NE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23 EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4,SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 119, RANGE 23 FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT FND IP 1/2" OPEN TIPPED FND IP 1/2" OPEN FND IP CAPPED 24992 FND IP CAPPED 24992 30 30 30 30 WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022 WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022 EXISTING BUILDINGS SENIOR HOUSING "H" 56,000 S.F. 55+ HOUSING "I" 39,700 S.F. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "G" 51,000 S.F. PROPOSED OFFICE "E" 11,200 S.F. PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 19,700 S.F. PROPOSED RETAIL "C" 24,700 S.F. PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 24,700 S.F. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "A" 62,700 S.F. PROPOSED TOWNHOMES "K" PROPOSED VILLAS "J" WATER TOWER 184 UNITS 144 UNITS 20 UNITS 228 UNITS 204 UNITS 1.2 AC 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 1128 2520 25 25 16 16 PROPOSED RETAIL "F" 11,200 S.F. 10 10 10 10 18 131318 1111 11 21 18 22 39 22 22 1212 23 22 13 16 16 13 17 13 17 21 POND EXISTING POND POND POND POND EXISTING CEMETERY POND POND POND PROPOSED TOWNHOMES "L" 6 UNITS 6 UNITS 6 UNITS 6 UNITS 6 UNITS 4 UNITS 4 UNITS 8 UNITS 4 UNITS 44 UNITS 0.96 ACRES 5.48 ACRES UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 1 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 UNIT 9UNIT 10 UNIT 11UNIT 12UNIT 13 UNIT 14 UNIT 15 UNIT 16 UNIT 17 UNIT 18 UNIT 19UNIT 20 3.13 ACRES 4.33 ACRES 4.45 ACRES 2.02 ACRES 0.97 ACRES 5.15 ACRES 2.38 ACRES 1.72 ACRES 5.41 ACRES 3.52 ACRES 38,535 S.F. 5,318 S.F. 24,000 S.F.1S 2S 5S 3S 6S 4S 7S 8S 10s 11S 12S 9S 2P 3P 4P 6P 5P 11S -OS 12S -OS 6S -OS 1P Exsiting Proposed 100-Year Discharge Volumes Drainage Area Area Impv Water Prvs Drainage Area Area % Impv Impv Prvs Existing Proposed Req. Storage Provided BMPs Provided Flood Storage 1E 65810 0 0 65810 1S 111255 0.5 55628 55628 North 2.209 3.224 1.015 4P 2.016 2E 60447 0 0 60447 2S 120848 0.5 60424 60424 East 9.68 9.439 -0.241 6P 6.102 3E 182358 0 0 182358 3S 264511 0.65 171932 92579 Wetland 11.560 14.823 3.263 3P, 5P 5.730 4E 86347 32104 0 54243 4S 171519 0.8 137215 34304 Northwest 3.225 4.481 1.256 1P, 2P 3.137 5E 254208 3185 0 251023 5S 402911 0.8 322329 80582 6E 508312 8217 55178 444917 6S 95641 0.8 76513 19128 Filtration Sizing (1.5' WQ Depth)(2.5' Flood Depth*) 7E 410065 153287 44975 211803 7S 137797 0 55178 82619 Basin DAs Treated New Impv WQV (1.1)Bottom SA Top SA Prd Tot Vol 8E 56129 0 0 56129 8S 20587 Ex 5504 15083 sf cf sf sf cf 9E 136455 7547 0 128908 9S 376608 Ex 198262 178346 1P.F 1S, 4S 192843 17677 10800 17499 56061 10E 261168 0 0 261168 10S 66243 0.15 9936 56307 2P.F 2S 60424 5539 3200 7213 20289 11E 206948 0 0 206948 11S 273888 0.8 219110 54778 3P.F 5S 322329 29547 18300 16777 89618 12E 210287 0 0 210287 12S 490625 0.8 392500 98125 4P.F 3S 171932 15760 9500 15832 50129 13E 63949 0 0 63949 6S-OS 136841 Ex 43540 93301 5P.F 11S 219110 20085 12200 19269 62402 10E-OS 136841 43540 0 93301 11S-OS 58308 Ex 31281 27027 6P.F 6S, 12S 469013 42993 26900 40495 146124 11E-OS 58308 31281 0 27027 12S-OS 54027 Ex 35102 18925 *6P.F = 3.75' Flood Depth 12E-OS 54027 35102 0 18925 2781609 1814454 967154.7 Pond Sizing (Botton of Wet)(4.5' Perm Pool)(2.5' Flood Depth *) 2751659 314263 100153 2337243 Basin DAs Treated 2.5" Vol 2.5" Vol Bottom SA NWL SA HWL SA Prd Tot Flood Vol af cf sf sf sf cf 1P.N 1S, 4S 0.923 40206 6600 13824 18306 40032 2P.N 2S 0.336 14636 2000 6570 9758 20279 3P.N 5S 1.441 62770 10900 19807 25110 56016 4P.N 3S 0.857 37331 6000 12949 17297 37677 5P.N 11S 0.979 42645 7000 14400 18968 41580 6P.N* 6S, 12S 2.097 91345 16600 27283 36773 119664 *6P.N = 3.75' Flood Depth Notes: NURP ponds need forebays, but dead storage can be up to 10-ft deep Basin Wet Pond Filtration Filt basins have MAX 1.5' drawdown 1P 18306 17499 Over rate control for N, W, and NW discharge points, but not much wiggle room to E 2P 9758 7213 Don’t want to undersize basins, or may need to incorporate iron enhancements 3P 25110 16777 4P 17297 15832 5P 18968 19269 6P 36773 40495 High Water Level Surface Areas Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Resolution Declaring Finding of “No Need” July 14, 2023 15 Synchro Reports HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: CR 116 & CSAH 30 07/10/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2023.syn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 6 499 37 88 120 27 7 60 58 87 302 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 6 499 37 88 120 27 7 60 58 87 302 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 6 537 40 95 129 0 8 65 62 94 325 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 603 683 579 343 797 223 328 278 435 437 371 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.43 0.00 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 6 537 40 95 129 0 8 65 62 94 325 10 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 14.3 0.9 1.7 2.4 0.0 0.2 1.7 1.9 2.3 9.0 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 14.3 0.9 1.7 2.4 0.0 0.2 1.7 1.9 2.3 9.0 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 603 683 579 343 797 223 328 278 435 437 371 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.79 0.07 0.28 0.16 0.04 0.20 0.22 0.22 0.74 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 764 1855 1572 440 1902 380 1294 1096 501 1307 1108 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.0 15.8 11.6 11.3 9.9 0.0 18.9 19.7 19.8 16.3 19.9 16.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 2.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.1 9.6 0.5 1.1 1.5 0.0 0.1 1.3 1.2 1.6 6.9 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.0 17.9 11.6 11.7 10.0 0.0 19.0 20.0 20.2 16.6 22.4 16.6 LnGrp LOS B B B B A B B C B C B Approach Vol, veh/h 583 224 135 429 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.4 10.7 20.0 21.0 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.3 14.3 8.4 24.9 5.1 17.6 4.9 28.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.9 38.7 6.9 55.5 5.5 39.1 5.5 56.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 3.9 3.7 16.3 2.2 11.0 2.1 4.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 0.1 4.1 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.7 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 6: CR 116 & Hunters Ridge 03/29/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2023.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 1 14 1 1 1 13 80 1 1 389 13 Future Vol, veh/h 8 1 14 1 1 1 13 80 1 1 389 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 300 - - 300 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 9 1 15 1 1 1 14 88 1 1 427 14 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 554 553 434 561 560 89 441 0 0 89 0 0 Stage 1 436 436 - 117 117 - - - - - - - Stage 2 118 117 - 444 443 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 443 441 622 438 437 969 1119 - - 1506 - - Stage 1 599 580 - 888 799 - - - - - - - Stage 2 887 799 - 593 576 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 437 435 622 422 431 969 1119 - - 1506 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 437 435 - 422 431 - - - - - - - Stage 1 591 579 - 876 789 - - - - - - - Stage 2 874 789 - 577 575 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.1 11.9 1.1 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1119 - - 533 524 1506 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.047 0.006 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.3 - - 12.1 11.9 7.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: CR 116 & CSAH 30 07/10/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2023.syn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 283 13 56 488 78 34 295 131 51 83 17 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 283 13 56 488 78 34 295 131 51 83 17 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 308 14 61 530 0 37 321 142 55 90 18 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 255 602 510 430 677 479 450 381 302 473 401 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.36 0.00 0.04 0.24 0.24 0.05 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 308 14 61 530 0 37 321 142 55 90 18 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 7.3 0.3 1.2 13.7 0.0 0.8 8.6 4.1 1.2 2.1 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 7.3 0.3 1.2 13.7 0.0 0.8 8.6 4.1 1.2 2.1 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 255 602 510 430 677 479 450 381 302 473 401 V/C Ratio(X)0.05 0.51 0.03 0.14 0.78 0.08 0.71 0.37 0.18 0.19 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 408 2249 1906 511 2249 589 1384 1173 396 1390 1178 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.3 15.0 12.6 11.5 15.5 0.0 14.4 19.0 17.3 14.8 16.0 15.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.1 2.0 0.0 0.1 2.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.2 5.1 0.2 0.8 9.2 0.0 0.6 6.5 2.5 0.8 1.5 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.4 15.7 12.7 11.6 17.5 0.0 14.5 21.1 17.9 15.1 16.2 15.4 LnGrp LOS B B B B B B C B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 334 591 500 163 Approach Delay, s/veh 15.5 16.9 19.7 15.7 Approach LOS B B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.3 17.6 7.5 22.0 6.6 18.3 5.3 24.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.7 40.3 5.5 65.5 5.5 40.5 5.5 65.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 10.6 3.2 9.3 2.8 4.1 2.2 15.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.5 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 4.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.3 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 6: CR 116 & Hunters Ridge 03/29/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2023.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 1 15 3 1 1 17 365 2 1 135 10 Future Vol, veh/h 13 1 15 3 1 1 17 365 2 1 135 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 300 - - 300 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 14 1 16 3 1 1 18 384 2 1 142 11 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 572 572 148 579 576 385 153 0 0 386 0 0 Stage 1 150 150 - 421 421 - - - - - - - Stage 2 422 422 - 158 155 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 431 430 899 426 428 663 1428 - - 1172 - - Stage 1 853 773 - 610 589 - - - - - - - Stage 2 609 588 - 844 769 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 425 424 899 414 422 663 1428 - - 1172 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 425 424 - 414 422 - - - - - - - Stage 1 842 772 - 602 581 - - - - - - - Stage 2 599 580 - 827 768 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.5 13.1 0.3 0.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1428 - - 584 449 1172 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.052 0.012 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 - - 11.5 13.1 8.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 0 0 - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: CR 116 & CSAH 30 07/10/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2028 nb.syn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 6 540 40 95 130 29 8 65 63 94 327 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 6 540 40 95 130 29 8 65 63 94 327 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 6 581 43 102 140 0 9 70 68 101 352 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 611 719 609 322 829 208 354 300 433 457 387 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.44 0.00 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 6 581 43 102 140 0 9 70 68 101 352 11 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 17.1 1.1 2.0 2.8 0.0 0.2 1.9 2.2 2.7 10.8 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 17.1 1.1 2.0 2.8 0.0 0.2 1.9 2.2 2.7 10.8 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 611 719 609 322 829 208 354 300 433 457 387 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.81 0.07 0.32 0.17 0.04 0.20 0.23 0.23 0.77 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 742 1689 1431 411 1756 332 1166 988 488 1196 1014 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.4 16.9 12.0 12.3 10.3 0.0 20.2 21.0 21.1 17.4 21.6 17.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 2.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.1 11.2 0.6 1.3 1.8 0.0 0.2 1.5 1.5 1.9 8.2 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.4 19.1 12.0 12.8 10.4 0.0 20.3 21.3 21.5 17.7 24.4 17.7 LnGrp LOS B B B B B C C C B C B Approach Vol, veh/h 630 242 147 464 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.6 11.4 21.3 22.8 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.6 16.1 8.6 28.1 5.2 19.5 5.0 31.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 38.3 7.2 55.5 5.0 39.3 5.0 57.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.7 4.2 4.0 19.1 2.2 12.8 2.1 4.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.6 0.1 4.6 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.0 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 6: CR 116 & Hunters Ridge 03/29/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2028 nb.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 1 15 1 1 1 14 87 1 1 421 14 Future Vol, veh/h 9 1 15 1 1 1 14 87 1 1 421 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 300 - 300 300 - 300 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 1 16 1 1 1 15 96 1 1 463 15 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 593 592 463 607 606 96 478 0 0 97 0 0 Stage 1 465 465 - 126 126 - - - - - - - Stage 2 128 127 - 481 480 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 417 419 599 408 411 960 1084 - - 1496 - - Stage 1 578 563 - 878 792 - - - - - - - Stage 2 876 791 - 566 554 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 411 413 599 392 405 960 1084 - - 1496 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 411 413 - 392 405 - - - - - - - Stage 1 570 562 - 866 781 - - - - - - - Stage 2 862 780 - 549 553 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.5 12.3 1.1 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 506 495 1496 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - 0.054 0.007 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - 12.5 12.3 7.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 0 0 - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: CR 116 & CSAH 30 07/10/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2028 nb.syn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 12 306 14 61 528 84 37 319 142 55 90 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 12 306 14 61 528 84 37 319 142 55 90 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 13 333 15 66 574 0 40 347 154 60 98 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 239 639 542 425 713 474 468 396 285 490 415 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.38 0.00 0.04 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 13 333 15 66 574 0 40 347 154 60 98 20 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 8.6 0.4 1.4 16.4 0.0 1.0 10.3 4.8 1.5 2.4 0.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 8.6 0.4 1.4 16.4 0.0 1.0 10.3 4.8 1.5 2.4 0.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 239 639 542 425 713 474 468 396 285 490 415 V/C Ratio(X) 0.05 0.52 0.03 0.16 0.81 0.08 0.74 0.39 0.21 0.20 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 361 2035 1725 483 2041 559 1262 1070 366 1281 1086 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.1 15.8 13.1 12.0 16.6 0.0 15.5 20.7 18.7 16.0 17.2 16.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.2 2.2 0.0 0.1 2.3 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.2 6.1 0.2 0.9 10.8 0.0 0.7 7.9 3.1 1.0 1.8 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.2 16.5 13.1 12.1 18.8 0.0 15.6 23.1 19.3 16.4 17.4 16.6 LnGrp LOS B B B B B B C B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 361 640 541 178 Approach Delay, s/veh 16.3 18.1 21.4 17.0 Approach LOS B B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.7 19.5 7.8 25.0 6.9 20.2 5.5 27.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.9 40.5 5.3 65.3 5.3 41.1 5.1 65.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 12.3 3.4 10.6 3.0 4.4 2.3 18.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.6 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 6: CR 116 & Hunters Ridge 03/29/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2028 nb.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 1 16 3 1 1 18 395 2 1 146 11 Future Vol, veh/h 14 1 16 3 1 1 18 395 2 1 146 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 300 - 300 300 - 300 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 1 17 3 1 1 19 416 2 1 154 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 612 612 154 625 622 416 166 0 0 418 0 0 Stage 1 156 156 - 454 454 - - - - - - - Stage 2 456 456 - 171 168 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 405 408 892 397 403 637 1412 - - 1141 - - Stage 1 846 769 - 586 569 - - - - - - - Stage 2 584 568 - 831 759 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 399 402 892 384 397 637 1412 - - 1141 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 399 402 - 384 397 - - - - - - - Stage 1 835 768 - 578 562 - - - - - - - Stage 2 574 561 - 813 758 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.9 13.7 0.3 0.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1412 - - 558 420 1141 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.058 0.013 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 - - 11.9 13.7 8.2 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 0 0 - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: CR 116 & CSAH 30 07/10/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2028 b.syn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 6 618 47 95 231 160 23 83 63 220 345 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 6 618 47 95 231 160 23 83 63 220 345 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 6 665 51 102 248 0 25 89 68 237 371 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 557 788 667 280 885 206 252 213 457 459 389 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.42 0.42 0.06 0.47 0.00 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 6 665 51 102 248 0 25 89 68 237 371 11 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 23.3 1.4 2.2 5.9 0.0 0.9 3.2 2.8 7.8 13.6 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 23.3 1.4 2.2 5.9 0.0 0.9 3.2 2.8 7.8 13.6 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 557 788 667 280 885 206 252 213 457 459 389 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.84 0.08 0.36 0.28 0.12 0.35 0.32 0.52 0.81 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 665 1474 1249 357 1538 279 695 589 575 948 804 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.0 19.0 12.6 14.5 11.7 0.0 26.2 28.7 28.6 20.9 25.9 20.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.8 0.9 0.9 3.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.1 14.8 0.9 1.5 4.1 0.0 0.7 2.6 2.0 5.8 10.3 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.0 21.6 12.7 15.3 11.8 0.0 26.5 29.5 29.4 21.8 29.4 21.0 LnGrp LOS B C B B B C C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 722 350 182 619 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.9 12.9 29.1 26.3 Approach LOS C B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.6 14.3 8.9 35.2 6.5 22.4 5.1 39.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.9 27.1 7.5 57.5 5.0 37.0 5.0 60.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.8 5.2 4.2 25.3 2.9 15.6 2.1 7.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.6 0.1 5.4 0.0 2.3 0.0 1.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.0 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 6: CR 116 & Hunters Ridge 03/29/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2028 b.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 60 1 180 1 1 1 170 80 1 1 400 87 Future Vol, veh/h 60 1 180 1 1 1 170 80 1 1 400 87 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 300 - 300 300 - 300 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 66 1 198 1 1 1 187 88 1 1 440 96 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 906 905 440 1052 1000 88 536 0 0 89 0 0 Stage 1 442 442 - 462 462 - - - - - - - Stage 2 464 463 - 590 538 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 257 276 617 204 243 970 1032 - - 1506 - - Stage 1 594 576 - 580 565 - - - - - - - Stage 2 578 564 - 494 522 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 220 226 617 119 199 970 1032 - - 1506 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 220 226 - 119 199 - - - - - - - Stage 1 486 575 - 475 463 - - - - - - - Stage 2 472 462 - 335 521 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 26.6 22.7 6.3 0 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1032 - - 424 207 1506 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.181 - - 0.625 0.016 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 - - 26.6 22.7 7.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - D C A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 4.1 0 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC 9: CSAH 30 & access 03/29/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2028 b.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 48 555 137 135 121 25 Future Vol, veh/h 48 555 137 135 121 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 300 - - 300 300 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 52 603 149 147 132 27 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 296 0 - 0 856 149 Stage 1 - - - - 149 - Stage 2 - - - - 707 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1265 - - - 328 898 Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 489 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1265 - - - 315 898 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 315 - Stage 1 - - - - 843 - Stage 2 - - - - 489 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 21.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 1265 - - - 315 898 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 - - - 0.418 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s) 8 - - - 24.4 9.1 HCM Lane LOS A - - - C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 2 0.1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: CR 116 & CSAH 30 07/10/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2028 b.syn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 12 417 28 61 584 215 45 338 142 203 111 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 12 417 28 61 584 215 45 338 142 203 111 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 13 453 30 66 635 0 49 367 154 221 121 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 191 685 580 327 746 468 452 383 346 589 499 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.37 0.37 0.05 0.40 0.00 0.04 0.24 0.24 0.11 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 13 453 30 66 635 0 49 367 154 221 121 20 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 15.9 1.0 1.8 24.3 0.0 1.6 14.6 6.4 6.9 3.7 0.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 15.9 1.0 1.8 24.3 0.0 1.6 14.6 6.4 6.9 3.7 0.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 191 685 580 327 746 468 452 383 346 589 499 V/C Ratio(X) 0.07 0.66 0.05 0.20 0.85 0.10 0.81 0.40 0.64 0.21 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 276 1598 1354 361 1605 509 761 645 425 937 794 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.2 20.9 16.1 15.7 21.5 0.0 20.8 28.1 25.0 19.5 19.7 18.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.3 2.9 0.0 0.1 3.5 0.7 2.3 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.3 11.0 0.6 1.3 15.7 0.0 1.2 10.9 4.3 5.2 2.9 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.3 22.0 16.1 16.0 24.4 0.0 20.8 31.7 25.7 21.7 19.9 18.7 LnGrp LOS B C B B C C C C C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 496 701 570 362 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.5 23.6 29.1 20.9 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.5 23.5 8.3 33.3 7.8 29.3 5.7 35.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 32.0 5.3 67.2 5.1 39.4 5.0 67.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.9 16.6 3.8 17.9 3.6 5.7 2.4 26.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 2.5 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 5.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.1 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 6: CR 116 & Hunters Ridge 03/29/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2028 b.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 85 1 190 3 1 1 175 379 2 1 141 60 Future Vol, veh/h 85 1 190 3 1 1 175 379 2 1 141 60 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 300 - 300 300 - 300 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 89 1 200 3 1 1 184 399 2 1 148 63 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 919 919 148 1049 980 399 211 0 0 401 0 0 Stage 1 150 150 - 767 767 - - - - - - - Stage 2 769 769 - 282 213 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 252 271 899 205 250 651 1360 - - 1158 - - Stage 1 853 773 - 395 411 - - - - - - - Stage 2 394 411 - 725 726 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 225 234 899 142 216 651 1360 - - 1158 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 225 234 - 142 216 - - - - - - - Stage 1 738 772 - 342 356 - - - - - - - Stage 2 339 356 - 562 725 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 24.8 25.3 2.5 0 HCM LOS C D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1360 - - 465 183 1158 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.135 - - 0.625 0.029 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 - - 24.8 25.3 8.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C D A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 4.2 0.1 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC 9: CSAH 30 & access 03/29/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2028 b.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 321 563 111 138 39 Future Vol, veh/h 27 321 563 111 138 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 300 - - 300 300 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 349 612 121 150 42 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 733 0 - 0 1019 612 Stage 1 - - - - 612 - Stage 2 - - - - 407 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 872 - - - 263 493 Stage 1 - - - - 541 - Stage 2 - - - - 672 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 872 - - - 254 493 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 254 - Stage 1 - - - - 523 - Stage 2 - - - - 672 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 32.3 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 872 - - - 254 493 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - - - 0.591 0.086 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 - - - 37.7 13 HCM Lane LOS A - - - E B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 3.4 0.3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: CR 116 & CSAH 30 07/10/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2040 nb.syn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 654 48 115 157 35 9 79 76 114 396 12 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 654 48 115 157 35 9 79 76 114 396 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 703 52 124 169 0 10 85 82 123 426 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 633 814 690 260 902 165 398 337 429 508 430 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.44 0.44 0.06 0.48 0.00 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.07 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 703 52 124 169 0 10 85 82 123 426 13 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 27.5 1.5 3.0 4.2 0.0 0.4 3.0 3.5 4.1 17.4 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 27.5 1.5 3.0 4.2 0.0 0.4 3.0 3.5 4.1 17.4 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 633 814 690 260 902 165 398 337 429 508 430 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.86 0.08 0.48 0.19 0.06 0.21 0.24 0.29 0.84 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 723 1308 1108 322 1366 253 849 720 441 880 745 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.4 20.7 13.3 16.7 11.9 0.0 25.4 26.2 26.4 20.9 27.8 21.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 3.6 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 3.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.2 17.5 1.0 2.1 3.0 0.0 0.3 2.4 2.4 3.1 12.6 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.5 24.3 13.4 18.0 12.0 0.0 25.6 26.5 26.8 21.3 31.6 21.7 LnGrp LOS B C B B B C C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 764 293 177 562 Approach Delay, s/veh 23.4 14.6 26.6 29.1 Approach LOS C B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 21.7 9.2 39.7 5.5 26.4 5.4 43.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.3 36.7 7.5 56.5 5.0 38.0 5.0 59.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.1 5.5 5.0 29.5 2.4 19.4 2.2 6.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.1 5.7 0.0 2.6 0.0 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.1 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 6: CR 116 & Hunters Ridge 03/29/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2040 nb.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 1 18 1 1 1 17 105 1 1 509 17 Future Vol, veh/h 10 1 18 1 1 1 17 105 1 1 509 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 300 - 300 300 - 300 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 1 20 1 1 1 19 115 1 1 559 19 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 716 715 559 734 733 115 578 0 0 116 0 0 Stage 1 561 561 - 153 153 - - - - - - - Stage 2 155 154 - 581 580 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 345 356 529 336 348 937 996 - - 1473 - - Stage 1 512 510 - 849 771 - - - - - - - Stage 2 847 770 - 499 500 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 338 349 529 318 341 937 996 - - 1473 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 338 349 - 318 341 - - - - - - - Stage 1 502 509 - 833 756 - - - - - - - Stage 2 829 755 - 479 500 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.9 13.6 1.2 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 996 - - 436 420 1473 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 - - 0.073 0.008 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 - - 13.9 13.6 7.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.2 0 0 - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: CR 116 & CSAH 30 07/10/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2040 nb.syn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 371 17 73 639 102 45 386 172 67 109 22 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 371 17 73 639 102 45 386 172 67 109 22 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 403 18 79 695 0 49 420 187 73 118 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 194 745 631 407 808 458 515 437 232 531 450 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.40 0.40 0.05 0.43 0.00 0.04 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 15 403 18 79 695 0 49 420 187 73 118 24 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 13.2 0.6 2.0 26.9 0.0 1.5 16.8 7.8 2.3 3.9 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 13.2 0.6 2.0 26.9 0.0 1.5 16.8 7.8 2.3 3.9 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 194 745 631 407 808 458 515 437 232 531 450 V/C Ratio(X) 0.08 0.54 0.03 0.19 0.86 0.11 0.82 0.43 0.31 0.22 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 275 1538 1303 442 1552 497 936 793 261 940 797 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.5 18.5 14.7 13.8 20.6 0.0 19.3 27.1 23.9 21.0 21.9 20.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.2 2.8 0.0 0.1 3.2 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.3 9.4 0.3 1.4 17.0 0.0 1.1 12.2 5.2 1.7 3.0 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.7 19.1 14.7 14.0 23.4 0.0 19.4 30.3 24.5 21.7 22.1 20.9 LnGrp LOS B B B B C B C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 436 774 656 215 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.9 22.4 27.9 21.9 Approach LOS B C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.5 26.6 8.6 36.4 7.8 27.3 5.9 39.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.3 40.1 5.7 65.9 5.1 40.3 5.1 66.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 18.8 4.0 15.2 3.5 5.9 2.4 28.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.3 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 5.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.3 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 6: CR 116 & Hunters Ridge 03/29/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2040 nb.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 1 20 4 1 1 22 478 3 1 177 13 Future Vol, veh/h 17 1 20 4 1 1 22 478 3 1 177 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 300 - 300 300 - 300 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 1 21 4 1 1 23 503 3 1 186 14 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 740 740 186 755 751 503 200 0 0 506 0 0 Stage 1 188 188 - 549 549 - - - - - - - Stage 2 552 552 - 206 202 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 333 345 856 325 340 569 1372 - - 1059 - - Stage 1 814 745 - 520 516 - - - - - - - Stage 2 518 515 - 796 734 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 327 339 856 312 334 569 1372 - - 1059 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 327 339 - 312 334 - - - - - - - Stage 1 800 744 - 511 507 - - - - - - - Stage 2 507 506 - 775 733 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.1 15.8 0.3 0 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1372 - - 485 341 1059 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - 0.082 0.019 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 - - 13.1 15.8 8.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - B C A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.3 0.1 0 - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: CR 116 & CSAH 30 07/10/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2040 b.syn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 732 59 115 266 166 25 97 76 240 414 12 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 732 59 115 266 166 25 97 76 240 414 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 787 63 124 286 0 27 104 82 258 445 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 552 873 740 219 952 161 298 253 450 507 429 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.47 0.47 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 787 63 124 286 0 27 104 82 258 445 13 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 38.2 2.2 3.4 8.7 0.0 1.2 4.9 4.5 11.4 22.5 0.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 38.2 2.2 3.4 8.7 0.0 1.2 4.9 4.5 11.4 22.5 0.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 552 873 740 219 952 161 298 253 450 507 429 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.90 0.09 0.56 0.30 0.17 0.35 0.32 0.57 0.88 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 623 1109 940 242 1138 204 487 413 499 701 594 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.6 24.2 14.6 21.3 14.0 0.0 33.9 36.9 36.7 27.2 34.4 26.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 8.6 0.0 2.5 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.3 9.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.2 25.0 1.4 2.6 6.5 0.0 1.0 4.1 3.2 8.6 16.8 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.6 32.8 14.7 23.8 14.2 0.0 34.4 37.6 37.5 28.4 43.7 26.5 LnGrp LOS B C B C B C D D C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 859 410 213 716 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.3 17.1 37.1 37.9 Approach LOS C B D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.1 20.2 9.8 50.5 7.1 31.2 5.6 54.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.3 25.7 6.5 58.5 5.0 37.0 5.0 60.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.4 6.9 5.4 40.2 3.2 24.5 2.3 10.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.7 0.0 5.8 0.0 2.3 0.0 1.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.4 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 6: CR 116 & Hunters Ridge 03/29/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2040 b.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 10.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 1 183 1 1 1 173 98 1 1 488 90 Future Vol, veh/h 61 1 183 1 1 1 173 98 1 1 488 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 300 - 300 300 - 300 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 67 1 201 1 1 1 190 108 1 1 536 99 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1028 1027 536 1177 1125 108 635 0 0 109 0 0 Stage 1 538 538 - 488 488 - - - - - - - Stage 2 490 489 - 689 637 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 212 234 545 168 205 946 948 - - 1481 - - Stage 1 527 522 - 561 550 - - - - - - - Stage 2 560 549 - 436 471 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 178 187 545 89 164 946 948 - - 1481 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 178 187 - 89 164 - - - - - - - Stage 1 422 521 - 449 440 - - - - - - - Stage 2 446 439 - 274 471 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 40 27.5 6.2 0 HCM LOS E D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 948 - - 358 163 1481 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.201 - - 0.752 0.02 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 - - 40 27.5 7.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - E D A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 5.9 0.1 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC 9: CSAH 30 & access 03/29/2023 AM Synchro 11 Report 2040 b.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 48 678 168 135 121 25 Future Vol, veh/h 48 678 168 135 121 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 300 - - 300 300 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 52 737 183 147 132 27 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 330 0 - 0 1024 183 Stage 1 - - - - 183 - Stage 2 - - - - 841 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1229 - - - 261 859 Stage 1 - - - - 848 - Stage 2 - - - - 423 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1229 - - - 250 859 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 250 - Stage 1 - - - - 812 - Stage 2 - - - - 423 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 30 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 1229 - - - 250 859 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - - 0.526 0.032 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 - - - 34.3 9.3 HCM Lane LOS A - - - D A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 2.8 0.1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: CR 116 & CSAH 30 07/10/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2040 b.syn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 482 33 73 718 233 56 405 172 215 130 22 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 482 33 73 718 233 56 405 172 215 130 22 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 524 36 79 780 0 61 440 187 234 141 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 145 814 690 321 859 449 484 411 273 606 514 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.44 0.44 0.04 0.46 0.00 0.04 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 15 524 36 79 780 0 61 440 187 234 141 24 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 24.5 1.5 2.7 43.1 0.0 2.8 25.4 11.0 10.4 6.1 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 24.5 1.5 2.7 43.1 0.0 2.8 25.4 11.0 10.4 6.1 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 145 814 690 321 859 449 484 411 273 606 514 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.64 0.05 0.25 0.91 0.14 0.91 0.46 0.86 0.23 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 195 1137 963 340 1150 462 537 455 273 645 546 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.4 24.7 18.2 18.9 27.9 0.0 28.5 40.0 34.7 28.7 27.5 25.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.9 0.0 0.4 8.5 0.0 0.1 18.3 0.8 22.5 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.4 16.2 1.0 2.0 28.0 0.0 2.2 20.1 7.8 10.1 5.0 0.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.7 25.5 18.2 19.3 36.4 0.0 28.6 58.2 35.5 51.2 27.7 25.9 LnGrp LOS C C B B D C E D D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 575 859 688 399 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.1 34.8 49.4 41.4 Approach LOS C C D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 33.4 9.1 53.0 8.7 40.6 6.4 55.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.5 32.0 5.8 67.7 5.1 38.4 5.0 68.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.4 27.4 4.7 26.5 4.8 8.1 2.5 45.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 6.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 37.6 HCM 6th LOS D Notes Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 6: CR 116 & Hunters Ridge 03/29/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2040 b.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 10.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 88 1 194 4 1 1 179 462 3 1 172 62 Future Vol, veh/h 88 1 194 4 1 1 179 462 3 1 172 62 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 300 - 300 300 - 300 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 93 1 204 4 1 1 188 486 3 1 181 65 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1048 1048 181 1180 1110 486 246 0 0 489 0 0 Stage 1 183 183 - 862 862 - - - - - - - Stage 2 865 865 - 318 248 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 206 228 862 167 209 581 1320 - - 1074 - - Stage 1 819 748 - 350 372 - - - - - - - Stage 2 348 371 - 693 701 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 182 195 862 113 179 581 1320 - - 1074 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 182 195 - 113 179 - - - - - - - Stage 1 703 747 - 300 319 - - - - - - - Stage 2 297 318 - 528 700 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 36.7 31.9 2.3 0 HCM LOS E D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1320 - - 397 140 1074 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.143 - - 0.75 0.045 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 - - 36.7 31.9 8.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - E D A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 6.1 0.1 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC 9: CSAH 30 & access 03/29/2023 PM Synchro 11 Report 2040 b.syn Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.7 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 391 685 111 138 39 Future Vol, veh/h 27 391 685 111 138 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 300 - - 300 300 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 425 745 121 150 42 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 866 0 - 0 1228 745 Stage 1 - - - - 745 - Stage 2 - - - - 483 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 777 - - - 197 414 Stage 1 - - - - 469 - Stage 2 - - - - 620 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 777 - - - 190 414 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 190 - Stage 1 - - - - 452 - Stage 2 - - - - 620 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 58.8 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 777 - - - 190 414 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 - - - 0.789 0.102 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - - 71.3 14.7 HCM Lane LOS A - - - F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 5.4 0.3 Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Resolution Declaring Finding of “No Need” July 14, 2023 16 Permits and Approvals Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal - - - State Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit To be completed MPCA Sewer Extension Project To be completed Minnesota Department of Health Watermain Extension Permit To be completed Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Water Appropriations Permit, if needed To be completed County Hennepin County County Road Access Permit To be completed Local City of Corcoran EAW / EIS Need Decision Draft prepared City of Corcoran Wetland Conservation Act (Boundary Approval/Replacement Plan) To be completed City of Corcoran Preliminary and Final Plat To be completed City of Corcoran Erosion Control, Grading, and Stormwater Permit To be completed City of Corcoran Building Permits To be completed City of Corcoran Conditional Use Permit Amendment or Use of Planned Use Development (for Cemetery Expansion) To be completed Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Stormwater, Erosion Control, and Site Plan Approval To be completed Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Environmental Assessment Worksheet July 14, 2023 17 Appendix C: Resolution Declaring Finding of “No Need” Hope Community Development Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Resolution Declaring Finding of “No Need” July 14, 2023 18 Appendix D: Environmental Assessment Worksheet Hope Community Development Project Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet May 2023 Prepared for: City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. One Carlson Parkway, Suite 100 Plymouth, Minnesota 55426 Hope Community Development Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet Proposer: Hope Community Church, Brian & Jacque Lother & Corcoran Investments, LLC RGU: City of Corcoran, Minnesota May 2023 Table of Contents 1. Project Title ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Proposer ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 3. Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) ........................................................................................................ 1 4. Reason for EAW Preparation ........................................................................................................................ 1 5. Project Location ............................................................................................................................................. 2 6. Project Description ........................................................................................................................................ 2 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience................................................................................................................ 5 8. Cover Types................................................................................................................................................. 10 9. Permits and Approvals Required ................................................................................................................. 11 10. Land use....................................................................................................................................................... 12 11. Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms .............................................................................................. 13 12. Water Resources .......................................................................................................................................... 16 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes ............................................................................................... 24 14. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) .......................... 26 15. Historic Properties ....................................................................................................................................... 33 16. Visual ........................................................................................................................................................... 33 17. Air ................................................................................................................................................................ 33 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint ................................................................................. 34 19. Noise ............................................................................................................................................................ 38 20. Transportation.............................................................................................................................................. 39 21. Cumulative Potential Effects ....................................................................................................................... 40 22. Other Potential Environmental Effects ........................................................................................................ 41 Tables Table 1. Project Magnitude ........................................................................................................................................4 Table 2. Climate Considerations and Adaptations .....................................................................................................9 Table 3. Cover Types ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Table 4. Green Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................... 10 Table 5. Tree Canopy ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 6. Permits and Approvals ............................................................................................................................... 11 Table 7. Soils within the Project Area ...................................................................................................................... 16 Table 8. DNR Public Waters within One Mile of the Site ....................................................................................... 17 Table 9. Wetlands Delineated within and adjacent to the Project Area ................................................................... 18 Table 10. Impaired Waters within One Mile of the Site ........................................................................................... 18 Table 11. Verified Wells within 500 feet of the Site ................................................................................................ 20 Table 12. MPCA Potentially Contaminated Sites within a One-Half Mile of the Project Area ............................... 24 Table 13. Emission Categories for Carbon Footprint ............................................................................................... 34 Table 14. Average Trips per Day ............................................................................................................................. 35 Table 15. GHG Emissions Summary (CO2e in short tons per year) ........................................................................ 37 Figures Figure 1: Project Location USGS Topo Figure 2: Project Location Aerial Map Figure 3: Site Plan Concept Figure 4: Phasing Plan Figure 5: Land Cover Figure 6: Parks Trails and Other Recreational Areas Figure 7: Farmland and Soils Classification Figure 8: Water Resources Figure 9: Water Resources within the Project Area Figure 10: Minnesota Well Index Figure 11: MPCA Potentially Contaminated Sites Appendices Appendix A: Figures Appendix B: FEMA Maps Appendix C: MDH Well Log Reports Appendix D: NRCS Soil Report Appendix E: NHIS Query and IPaC Species List Appendix F: SHPO Correspondence Appendix G: Greenhouse Gas Analysis Calculations Appendix H: Feasibility Study Hope Church Development 1 Environmental Assessment Worksheet December 2022 version Environmental Assessment Worksheet This most recent Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and guidance documents are available at the Environmental Quality Board’s website at: https://www.eqb.state.mn.us/ The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. Guidance documents provide additional detail and links to resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item or can be addressed collectively under EAW Item 21. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project Title Hope Community Mixed-Use Development, City of Corcoran 2. Proposer Proposer: Hope Community Church Contact person: Josh McKinney Title: Project Manager/Principal Address: 19951 Oswald Farm Road City, State, ZIP: Corcoran, MN 55374 Phone: 612-440-0934 Fax: N/A Email: jmckinney@measuregrp.com 3. Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) RGU Agency: City of Corcoran Contact person: Natalie Davis McKeown Title: Planner Address: 8200 County Road 116 City, State, ZIP: Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-338-9288 Fax: N/A Email: ndavis@corcoranmn.gov 4. Reason for EAW Preparation Required: Discretionary: EIS Scoping Citizen petition X Mandatory EAW RGU discretion Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): Hope Church Development 2 Environmental Assessment Worksheet - 4410.4300, Subp. 32: Mixed residential and industrial-commercial projects. - 4410.4300, Subp. 19 (D): Residential development. - 4410.4300, Subp. 14(B)(2): Industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities. 5. Project Location County: Hennepin City/Township: Corcoran PLS Location (¼, ¼, Section, Township, Range): east ½ of northeast ¼ of Section 11, Township 119N, Range 23W Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Mississippi River (Rush Creek sub watershed of the Elm Creek watershed) GPS Coordinates: 45.132627, -93.546608 Tax Parcel Number: 1111923140004, 1111923140005, 1111923140003, 1111923110012 At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project; • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); and • Site plans showing all significant project and natural features. Pre-construction site plan and post- construction site plan. • List of data sources, models, and other resources (from the Item-by-Item Guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience or other) used for information about current Minnesota climate trends and how climate change is anticipated to affect the general location of the project during the life of the project (as detailed below in item 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience). 6. Project Description a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). Hope Community Church proposes a mixed-use development spanning approximately 44.5 acres at the northwest corner of County Road 30 and County Road 116 in Corcoran, MN. The proposed plan reflects 738 housing units (primarily within multifamily buildings) and up to 110,300 square feet of commercial, retail, and medical office space. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities Complete Description and Existing Facility Hope Community Church (“Project Proposer”) proposes the Project currently referred to as “Hope Hope Church Development 3 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Community.” This would be a new mixed-use neighborhood that includes a variety of housing options, including age-restricted and market rate housing, as well as space for medical office and retail/commercial uses. The Project would be located in the City of Corcoran in Hennepin County, Minnesota on the northwest corner of County Road 116 and County Road 30 spanning approximately 44.5 acres centering around roughly 12 acres of existing development. The existing development on the site includes Hope Community Church, an accessory daycare that operates within the church, the cemetery associated with the church, and the City’s first water tower (under development). Agricultural land is present to the west and an existing single-family residential neighborhood exists to the north. The Project Area contains four wetland basins according to the wetland delineation application submitted at the end of 2022 and currently under review with the RGU. The new development includes two market rate non-age restricted multifamily apartment buildings, two senior apartment buildings providing a continuum of care, 20 senior detached villas, and non-age restricted townhomes (738 residential units total). The project proposes two large medical office buildings and two smaller buildings intended for retail space (up to 110,300 square feet of commercial space total). Additional components of the site include an expansion of the existing cemetery site (an expansion of roughly 0.87 acres) and a playground/tot lot to the east of the senior villas (approximately 0.78 acres). Construction Activities 1) Construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Standard construction methods are expected to be used. The Project Area would be graded in phases. It is anticipated that the commercial portion of the site would be mass graded when the first commercial project moves forward. The rest of the sites would be expected to be graded individually. A majority of the existing wetland areas would be protected. There are no known significant natural communities in existence throughout the site today with the majority of the Project Area consisting of cropland. The Project would require the construction of a west/east public street to serve the senior villas and senior multifamily buildings. Oswald Farm Road would be extended to bring the public street to the southwest property line. The City would be completing a utility extension project so that both sewer and water are available at the border of the site. The utilities are being extended for the purpose of the proposed water treatment project and not specifically for the Project, but since the City’s water tower is within this site, a portion of the work would be completed within the Project Area. In addition to sanitary sewer and water, development of the site would include installation of other minor utilities (e.g., cable/internet). Offsite improvements are discussed in Appendix H. 2) Modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes No modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes are anticipated. 3) Significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures Besides the existing church site within the Project Area, the Project Area is mostly vacant. There is an existing barn and home across from the church near County Road 116. These would be demolished. No remodeling of the existing church and cemetery are proposed. 4) Timing and duration of construction activities Construction activities would be expected to begin in fall of 2023 and completed by the end of Hope Church Development 4 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 2028. The Project Proposer’s anticipated phasing plan is provided below (see Figure 4, Appendix A): Phase 1A: Fall 2023 – Spring 2025 • Includes the multi-family building along County Road 116. • The first phase of the senior living housing apartments and villas (east). Phase 1B: Spring 2024 - Spring 2025 • First phase of commercial and medical buildings. • Townhomes along County Road 116. Phase 2: Spring 2025 – Fall 2027 • Multi-family building along County Road 30. • Final buildout for the commercial/medical buildings. Phase 3: 2026 – 2028 • 2nd phase of the Senior Living (west). The expected phasing plan is subject to change and would ultimately be driven by the market. c. Project magnitude Table 1 summarizes the project magnitude. Table 1. Project Magnitude Description Number Total Project Acreage 44.5 acres Linear project length N/A Number and type of residential units 738 total - 340 multifamily units - 324 senior multifamily units - 20 senior single-family units - 54 townhome units Residential building area (in square feet) Market rate multifamily estimate – 376K sq. ft. - MF A – 43,000 SF x 4 stories = 172,000 - MF F – 51,000 SF x 4 stories = 204,000 Senior housing multifamily estimate – 356,400 sq. ft. - SH G – 56,000 SF x 4 stories = 224,000 - SH H – 33,100 SF x 4 stories = 132,400 Townhouses – 38,535 sq. ft. (footprint) Villas – 2,400 sq. ft. (footprint) Commercial building area (in square feet) Estimated total commercial building area – 110, 300 sq. ft. Industrial building area (in square feet) 0 sq. ft. Institutional building area (in square feet) 0 sq. ft. Hope Church Development 5 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Other uses – specify (in square feet) Park/Playground Space – 37,880 sq. ft. (estimated) Cemetery expansion – 33,792 sq. ft. (estimated) Structure height(s) Commercial maximum – 3 stories. Multifamily maximum – 4 stories. d. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The Project is proposed by entities associated with Hope Community Church and would be carried out by a private party. The Project Proposer hopes to create a campus that provides housing, particularly for seniors, and creates a community center with commercial and medical users. The proposed plan would provide beneficial places for multiple age groups to live, work, dine, and worship. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. f. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? X Yes No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. Hope Community Church was approved in 2001, and the final plat for Hope Place was completed in 2002. A daycare was approved at Hope Community Church in 2005 and is still in operation as an accessory use. The cemetery was approved in 2012. A plat to carve out a property for the City’s water tower was processed in 2022 and earlier this year. Construction of the water tower would begin this year and is expected to be completed at the end of 2024. Past phases did not trigger environmental reviews, so there is no record of an environmental review completed in the past. 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience a. Describe the climate trends in the general location of the project (see guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience) and how climate change is anticipated to affect that location during the life of the project. In general, Minnesota is anticipated to experience an increase in temperature, precipitation, and more frequent extreme precipitation events resulting from climate change. In Minnesota, annual average temperatures have risen three degrees over the past century and up to three degrees in the northern part of the state. The highest average temperature increases have occurred during the winter. Since 1895, temperatures during the winter have increased at a rate two to three times higher than during the summer. In particular, winter warming rates have risen more sharply in recent decades. 1 Current climate warming trends, most notably during the winter, are anticipated to continue.2 Heavy rain events have become more frequent in Minnesota and more intense. From 1973 to 2021, Minnesota experienced 16 mega-rain events 3 with a notable increase since 2000. Of these 16 events, three occurred in the 1970s, one in the 1980s, one in the 1990s, six mega-rain events occurred in the 2000s, 1 MNDNR. Climate Trends. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/climate_change_info/climate-trends.html 2 MnDOT. Minnesota Go Climate Change Report. 2021. https://www.minnesotago.org/trends/climate-change 3 Mega-rain events are defined as events in which six inches of rain covers more than 1,000 square miles and the core of the event tops eight inches. Hope Church Development 6 Environmental Assessment Worksheet four in the 2010s, and one in 2020. Thus, in the past 21 years (2000 to 2020), almost two times as many mega rain events occurred compared to the prior 27 years (1973 to 1999).4 Climate trends for Hennepin County parallel the overall statewide trends, indicating Minnesota’s climate is becoming warmer and wetter. Exhibits 1 and 2 illustrate historical average annual temperature and precipitation trends from 1895 to 2023. During this time period, the County experienced an average annual temperature increase of 0.23 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) per decade and annual precipitation increase of 0.24 inches per decade. Exhibit 1. Historical Annual Average Temperature in Hennepin County (1895 – 2023) Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical Exhibit 2. Historical Annual Average Precipitation in Hennepin County (1895 – 2023) Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 4 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Historic Mega-Rain Events in Minnesota. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/summaries_and_publications/mega_rain_events.html Hope Church Development 7 Environmental Assessment Worksheet https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) utilizes temperature and precipitation data to estimate relative soil moisture conditions and serve as an indicator of long-term drought conditions. The index ranges from -5 to +5 indicating dry and wet conditions, respectively. PDSI values are reported on a monthly basis. Exhibit 3 shows historic PDSI values for the month of August from 1895 to 2023 for Hennepin County, which indicates an increase of 0.19 per decade. Generally, the PSDI historical data indicates that the region is experiencing a wetter climate. Exhibit 3. Historical PDSI Values for Hennepin County (1895 – 2023) Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/ewr/climateexplorer/main/historical Projected climate trends indicate that temperatures within the County will continue to increase. Exhibit 4 illustrates projected temperatures for the County. Several climate models are shown in the projected temperature analysis. The model mean, shown in blue, illustrates the average of all models included in the analysis. Exhibit 4 shows the modeled present condition, mid-century (2040-2059) at Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5, late-century (2080-2099) at RCP 4.5, and late-century (2080-2099) at RCP 8.5. RCP is a greenhouse gas concentration scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in the fifth assessment report. RCP 4.5 is an intermediate scenario in which emissions decline after peaking around 2040 and RCP 8.5 represents a worst-case scenario in which emissions continue rising through the 21st century. Under the RCP 4.5 scenario, the annual temperature is anticipated to increase within the County from a modeled present mean of 45.28°F (1980-1999) to a mid-century (2040-2059) model mean of 48.87°F and a late-century (2080-2099) model mean of 51.27°F. Under the RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario, the County would experience a late-century (2080-2099) model mean temperature of 55.03°F. Hope Church Development 8 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Exhibit 4. Projected Temperatures in Hennepin County Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Minnesota Climate Explorer (state.mn.us). Definitions of the models included in this analysis can be found at Climate Explorer Metadata | Minnesota DNR (state.mn.us). Exhibit 5 presents projected average annual precipitation for Hennepin County. Under the RCP 4.5 scenario, the annual precipitation is anticipated to increase within the County from a modeled present mean of 31.61 inches (1980-1999) to a mid-century (2040-2059) model mean of 32.12 inches and a late-century (2080-2099) model mean of 32.94 inches. Under the RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario, the County would experience a late-century (2080-2099) model mean precipitation of 35.70 inches. In comparison to the modeled present mean (1980-1999), the late-century (2080-2099) modeled mean annual precipitation would increase by approximately 1.3 percent under the RCP 4.5 scenario and increase by approximately 4.1 percent under the RCP 8.5 scenario. Exhibit 5. Projected Precipitation in Hennepin County Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Minnesota Climate Explorer (state.mn.us). Definitions of the models included in this analysis can be found at Climate Explorer Metadata | Minnesota DNR (state.mn.us). Hope Church Development 9 Environmental Assessment Worksheet b. For each Resource Category in the table below: Describe how the project’s proposed activities and how the project’s design will interact with those climate trends. Describe proposed adaptations to address the project effects identified. Table 2 summarizes climate considerations related to the project and adaptation considerations. Table 2. Climate Considerations and Adaptations Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Adaptations Project Design Increased heavy rainfall and flooding. The Project would replace pervious surface area with impervious surface area (structures and pavement). Stormwater would be directed to several stormwater ponds and filtration basins in the Project Area to provide treatment and rate control, in compliance with local and state standards including Elm Creek Watershed requirements. Increase in rainfall frequency and intensity (as described in Item 7.a.) would be factored into the stormwater design for the Project. Land Use Heavier rainfall expected to increase risk of localized flooding. The Project is not located within a Federal Emergency Management Area (FEMA) defined floodplain or floodway. Increase in rainfall frequency and intensity (as described in Item 7.a.) would be factored into the stormwater design for the Project, referenced in Table 2, Project Design, Adaptations. Water Resources Address in item 12 Contamination/ Hazardous Materials/ Wastes Protection of water resources and soil from contamination. The Project would not introduce hazardous materials or waste to the Project Area. Not applicable (NA). The Project would not include the storage or generation of hazardous materials or waste. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features) Address in item 14. Hope Church Development 10 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 8. Cover Types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development. Table 3. Cover Types Cover Types Before (acres) After (acres) Wetlands and shallow lakes (<2 meters deep) 1.2 0 Deep lakes (>2 meters deep) 0 0 Wooded/forest 6.0 1.4 Rivers/streams 0 0 Grass/Shrub 19.8* 0 Cropland 15.8 0 Livestock rangeland/pastureland 0 0 Lawn/landscaping 0 20.6 Green infrastructure TOTAL (from table below*) 0 2.4 Impervious surface 1.7 17.3 Stormwater Pond (wet sedimentation basin) 0 2.7 Other (describe) 0 0 TOTAL 44.5 44.5 Acreages are approximate and based on DNR MLCCS land cover geospatial data. *Based on visual observations in the field, the “brush/grassland” quantified for the “Before” condition (including that reflected in Figure 5, Appendix A) would likely be better categorized as “cropland” (agricultural use). Table 4. Green Infrastructure Green Infrastructure* Before (acreage) After (acreage) Constructed infiltration systems (infiltration basins/infiltration trenches/ rainwater gardens/bioretention areas without underdrains/swales with impermeable check dams) 0 2.4 Constructed tree trenches and tree boxes 0 0 Constructed wetlands 0 0 Constructed green roofs 0 0 Constructed permeable pavements 0 0 Other (describe) Landfill-based geothermal system 0 0 TOTAL* 0 2.4 Hope Church Development 11 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 5. Tree Canopy Trees Percent Number Percent tree canopy removed or number of mature trees removed during development 77 Number of new trees planted Roughly 886 overstory trees; 399 understory trees/shrubs* *The number and type of trees would be negotiated during the Planned Unit Development process. 9. Permits and Approvals Required List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Table 6. Permits and Approvals Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal - - - State Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit To be completed MPCA Sewer Extension Permit To be completed Minnesota Department of Health Watermain Extension Permit To be completed County Hennepin County County Road Access Permit To be completed Local City of Corcoran EAW / EIS Need Decision Draft prepared City of Corcoran Wetland Conservation Act (Boundary Approval/Replacement Plan) To be completed City of Corcoran Preliminary and Final Plat To be completed City of Corcoran Erosion Control, Grading, and Stormwater Permit To be completed City of Corcoran Building Permits To be completed City of Corcoran Conditional Use Permit Amendment or Use of Planned Use Development (for Cemetery Expansion) To be completed Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Stormwater, Erosion Control, and Site Plan Approval To be completed Hope Church Development 12 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 10- 20, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No.22. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 21. 10. Land use a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks and open space, cemeteries, trails, prime or unique farmlands. Existing land use includes a church with an accessory daycare, cemetery, agricultural, a barn, and a single-family home. Areas of the site are vacant. The surrounding uses of the Project include a single-family residential neighborhood to the north and farmland or vacant land to the south, east, and west. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The Project Area has two land use designations shown in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The parcel that includes the existing church and cemetery is designated as Public/Institutional. The remaining parcels that comprise the Project Area are designated as mixed use. The City purchased roughly one acre of the site to construct the City’s first water tower. Three Rivers Park District plans show a portion of the proposed Diamond Lake Regional Trail may be located through the center of the site. The City’s Northeast District Plan shows a public street located along the west property line in the southwest portion of the site. iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The parcel that includes the church, daycare, and cemetery is zoned Public/Institution. The remaining parcels are zoned General Mixed Use. Wetlands on the site would be subject to a Wetland Overlay district. iv. If any critical facilities (i.e. facilities necessary for public health and safety, those storing hazardous materials, or those with housing occupants who may be insufficiently mobile) are proposed in floodplain areas and other areas identified as at risk for localized flooding, describe the risk potential considering changing precipitation and event intensity. There are no regulated floodways or floodplains located in the Project Area. Refer to Item 12.a. b. Discuss the project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. The Project appears to be compatible overall with nearby land uses, zoning, and most of the plans listed in Item 9.a. However, the plans may need to be revised to accommodate Three Rivers Park District’s adopted plan for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. Hope Church Development 13 Environmental Assessment Worksheet c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 10b above and any risk potential. It is understood that the Project Proposer’s intent is to maintain and enhance existing vegetative buffers between neighboring uses. This would provide a compatible transition to surrounding uses and mitigate the risk to the existing natural community. Further, the intensity of the Project is intentionally minimized along the Project Area boundaries and includes residential uses. The commercial uses are located in the far southeast corner of the Project Area. For example, a step down in intensity is shown from the senior living apartment buildings to the one-story senior villas up against a significant tree line along the northern property line (which would be preserved with the Project). This provides a compatible transition to the existing single-family neighborhood to the north while preserving desirable natural features of the site. The property to the west of the Project Area is guided as “Mixed Residential” which accommodates the multi- family building located in the southwest corner of the Project as an appropriate use for the long- term, given that a similar use on the neighboring property is expected in the future. Additionally, the Project Proposer has indicated their intent to utilize biofiltration as a primary means of stormwater treatment. 11. Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. The surficial geology in the Project Area has been mapped by the Minnesota Geological Survey’s (MGS) Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County as being sediments consisting of glacial till. Specifically, the Project Area contains loam till and may also contain clay loam till. These sediments are characterized as being calcareous and oxidized olive brown above unoxidized very dark gray. The surface expression is generally rolling and hummocky with numerous ice-walled stagnation plains and ice-block melt-out depressions indicative of ice stagnation. Silt loam deposited in ponded water is thin, patchy, and locally present on the tops of ice-walled stagnation plains. Organic detritus comprised of plant material in post- glacial land surface depressions may exist in areas currently or formerly beneath the water table. (Steenberg et al. 2018a)5. The bedrock geology across the Project Area has been mapped in the MGS Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County as consisting of Jordan Sandstone, the St. Lawrence Formation, and the Mazomanie Formation of the Tunnel City Group, all of which are from the late Cambrian Period. The Jordan Sandstone unit is characterized by medium- to coarse-grained, friable quartzose sandstone. The underlying St. Lawrence Formation is characterized by dolomitic siltstone and shale with interbedded very fine-grained sandstone and shale, while the Mazomanie Formation of the Tunnel City Group is characterized by fine- to medium- grained quartzose sandstone with interbedded dolomitic sandstone. (Steenberg et al. 2018b)6. The bedrock topography within the Project Area is mapped to be approximately 800 to 825 feet above mean 5 Steenberg, Julia R.; Bauer, Emily J.; Chandler, V.W.; Retzler, Andrew J.; Berthold, Angela J.; Lively, Richard S. 2018a. Minnesota Geological Survey. County Atlas Series. Atlas C-45, Hennepin County. Plate 3 – Surficial Geology. Available at: https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/58491/plate3_surficial.pdf?sequence=99&isAllowed=y. C-45, Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County, Minnesota (umn.edu). Accessed March 2023. 6 Steenberg, Julia R.; Bauer, Emily J.; Chandler, V.W.;Retzler, Andrew J.; Berthold, Angela J.; Lively, Richard S. 2018b. Minnesota Geological Survey. County Atlas Series. Atlas C-45, Hennepin County. Plate 2 – Bedrock Geology. Available at: https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/58491/plate2_bedrock.pdf?sequence=100&isAllowed=y. Accessed March 2023. Hope Church Development 14 Environmental Assessment Worksheet sea level (amsl) (Steenberg et al. 2018c)7. Given the approximate land surface topography of approximately 940 to 956 feet amsl, the depth to bedrock within the Project Area can be placed between approximately 140 feet and 156 feet (DNR undated (a))8. No wells were identified within the Project Area according to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Minnesota Well Index (MWI), but two wells located within one-quarter mile of the Project Area to the north along Hillside Drive support these findings: two domestic wells (Unique Wells 140169 and 126438) had available well log and stratigraphic reports that identified the presence of Jordan Sandstone bedrock at 141 feet and 148 feet, respectively (MDH 2021)9. The well log reports and stratigraphic reports are available in Appendix C. According to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Karst Feature Inventory, there are no known karst or sinkhole features within the Project Area or within the vicinity of the Project Area. The nearest feature is a sinkhole approximately 12 miles to the northeast of the Project Area in Andover, Minnesota (field verified 2017). (DNR undated (b))10. The first encountered bedrock is the Jordan Sandstone which is not known for karst features and is located at a depth greater than 100 feet below grade. The underlying St. Lawrence Formation is a siliciclastic-dominated bedrock that does contain minor dolostone layers with abundant macropores but is not considered karst because the secondary porosity is unlikely from dissolution (Runkel et al. 2014)11. Static water levels for the wells just north of the Project Area (Unique Wells 140169 and 126438) were reported at 55 feet and 100 feet, respectively. Given that these wells were reported to be completed in the Jordan Sandstone bedrock layer, which is above the St. Lawrence Formation layer in question, and the depth to bedrock is estimated to be 140 to 156 feet, this indicates that the Jordan Sandstone is fully saturated at these locations. Similar conditions are anticipated for the Project Area, therefore, the formation of karst there is unlikely. 7 Steenberg, Julia R.; Bauer, Emily J.; Chandler, V.W.;Retzler, Andrew J.; Berthold, Angela J.; Lively, Richard S. 2018c. Minnesota Geological Survey. County Atlas Series. Atlas C-45, Hennepin County. Plate 6 – Depth to Bedrock and Bedrock Topography. Available at: https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/58491/plate4_d2bdrk.pdf?sequence=98&isAllowed=y. Accessed March 2023. 8 DNR. undated (a). MnTOPO. Available at: http://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/maps/mntopo/. Accessed March 2023. 9 MDH. 2021. Minnesota Well Index. Available at: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/mwi/index.html. Accessed March 2023. 10 DNR. undated (b). Karst Feature Inventory. Available at: https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=9df792d8f86546f2aafc98b3e31adb62. Accessed March 2023. 11 Runkel, Anthony C.; Tipping, Robert R.; Green, J.A.; Jones, Perry M.; Meyer, Jessica R.; Parker, Beth L.; Steenberg, Julia R.; Retzler, Andrew J. 2014. Minnesota Geological Survey Open File Report 14-04, Hydrogeologic Properties of the St. Lawrence Aquitard, Southeastern Minnesota. Available at: https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/165299. Accessed March 2023. Hope Church Development 15 Environmental Assessment Worksheet b. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 12.b.ii. Table 7 includes hydrologic soil groups found in the Project Area. The four hydrologic soil groups are: • Group A: Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. • Group B: Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained, or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. • Group C: Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. • Group D: Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high-water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. Hope Church Development 16 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 7. Soils within the Project Area Source: USDA NRCS Hennepin County Soil Survey The Project Area is generally flat with no slopes greater than ten percent. According to the DNR MnTOPO map, the Project Area ranges from approximately 940 to 956 feet amsl with high and low points scattered throughout the Project Area (DNR undated (a))12. Based on the soils report for Hennepin County from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (Appendix D), there is one soil type within the Project Area that is moderately eroded: Lester loam, six to ten percent slopes (L22C2). This soil type makes up approximately seven acres (13 percent) of the Project Area and is located primarily in the southern half of the Project Area. (USDA NRCS 2023)13. The USDA NRCS soils report for Hennepin County also reports on hydrologic soil groups. Soils within the Project Area have slow to very slow infiltration rates, indicating a high runoff potential (USDA NRCS 2023)8. The volumes and acreages of soil excavation and grading are unknown at this time. Hope Community intends to reuse any soil on site and has committed to vegetating soils at risk for erosion. 12. Water Resources 12 DNR. undated (a). MnTOPO. Available at: http://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/maps/mntopo/. Accessed March 2023. 13 USDA NRCS. 2023. Web Soil Survey. Available at: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed March 2023. Map Symbol Name Percent Slopes Hydrologic Soil Group Approx. Acres Approx. Percent of Project Area L37B Angus loam 2 to 6 C 21.0 47.3 L44A Nessel loam 1 to 3 C 6.2 13.8 L23A Cordova loam 0 to 2 C/D 7.1 16.1 L22C2 Lester loam, moderately eroded 6 to 10 C 3.2 7.2 L24A Glencoe clay loam 0 to 1 C/D 0.2 0.3 L36A Hamel, overwash- Hamel complex 0 to 3 C/D 4.0 9.0 L45A Dundas-Cordova complex 0 to 3 C/D 2.2 5.0 L21A Canisteo clay loam 0 to 2 C/D 0.6 1.3 Total 44.5 100.0 Hope Church Development 17 Environmental Assessment Worksheet a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, shoreland classification and floodway/floodplain, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include the presence of aquatic invasive species and the water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. Surface Waters The Project Area is located within the Rush Creek subwatershed of the Elm Creek watershed and is part of the larger upper Mississippi River watershed. No lakes, streams or county ditches are located within the Project Area. No trout streams, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lakes or outstanding resource value waters are located within one mile of the Project Area. No aquatic invasive species are known to be present within one mile of the Project Area. DNR Public Waters No DNR Public Waters are located within the Project Area. Two Public Water Watercourses and five Public Water Wetlands are located within one mile of the Project Area (Table 8, Figure 8). Rush Creek is located northwest of the Project Area, and an unnamed tributary to Rush Creek is located southwest of the Project Area. The unnamed tributary flows through a large Public Water Wetland before flowing into Rush Creek. Additionally, four Public Water Wetlands are located southeast of the Project Area. Table 8. DNR Public Waters within One Mile of the Site Waterway Public Water ID Type Rush Creek M-062-004 Public Water Watercourse, Public Ditch/Altered Natural Watercourse Unnamed creek M-062-004-006 Public Water Watercourse Unnamed wetland 27016300 Public Water Wetland Unnamed wetland 27031600 Public Water Wetland Unnamed wetland 27031400 Public Water Wetland Unnamed wetland 27031500 Public Water Wetland Unnamed wetland 27044000 Public Water Wetland Wetland Resources Hope Church Development 18 Environmental Assessment Worksheet A wetland delineation has been completed for the Project Area. The delineation has been submitted to the Local Government Unit (LGU), undergone Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) review, and revised with supplemental information. LGU approval was provided in May 2023. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers conducted a preliminary review of the delineation but has not been requested to prepare a jurisdictional determination thus far. A total of six wetlands were delineated and are summarized in Table 9 and Figure 9. Note: Only Wetlands 1, 4, 5 and 6 are located within the Project Area. Of these, Wetlands 1 and 6 are farmed wetlands that were identified utilizing the offsite determination guidance, and Wetland 2 is functioning as a stormwater pond. Wetlands 2, 3, and 4 are indicated on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) with Wetland 4 occuring within the Project Area. Wetland types present in the Project Area include seasonally flooded basin, fresh meadow, and shallow open water wetlands. Table 9. Wetlands Delineated within and adjacent to the Project Area Wetland ID Circular* 39 Cowardin Dominant Vegetation Acres* (within Project Area) Wetland 1 Type 1 PEM1Af Yellow nut sedge, farmed wetland 0.89 acres Wetland 2 Type 5 PUB1Hx Cattail 0 acres Wetland 3 Type 2 PEM1B Reed canary grass 0 acres Wetland 4 Type 1 PEM1A Reed canary grass 0.08 acres Wetland 5 Type 1 PEM1A None 0.03 acres Wetland 6 Type 1 PEM1Af Farmed wetland 0.23 acres *Area of Wetlands 1 & 6 are approximate, as final approval of the level 1 delineation offsite review is still pending. MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List Based on a review of the MPCA’s 2022 Impaired Waters List 14, no MPCA 303d Impaired Waters are located within the Project Area. Rush Creek is located less than one mile northwest of the Project Area and is listed as impaired for aquatic life and aquatic recreation as a result of impairments for dissolved oxygen, E. coli, fish bioassessments, and benthic macroinvertebrates bioassessments (Table 10, Figure 8). Table 10. Impaired Waters within One Mile of the Site Water Body Name Section AUID* Affected Designated Use Pollutant or Stressor TMDL** ID Rush Creek T119, R23W, S11 07010206-528 Aquatic life, Aquatic recreation Dissolved oxygen, E. coli, fish bioassessments, benthic macroinvertebrates bioassessments No approved TMDL *Assessment Unit Identification (AUID) **Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) 14 MPCA. Minnesota’s Impaired Waters List. Accessed May 2023. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/air-water-land-climate/minnesotas-impaired-waters-list Hope Church Development 19 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Floodway/Floodplain There are no regulated floodways or floodplains located in the Project Area. Several regulated 100-year floodplain areas (one percent annual chance of flooding) and a floodway are located within one mile of the Project Area (Appendix B). The floodway is associated with Rush Creek and is located 0.75 miles northwest of the Project Area. A floodplain associated with Rush Creek and the Public Water Wetland is located a third of a mile west of the Project Area; this floodplain has a small fringe area located in the 500-year floodplain (0.2 percent annual flood hazard zone). Additionally, there is a floodplain located a tenth of a mile to the north, one 0.6 miles to the east, and one 0.3 miles to the southeast of the Project Area. The Project would not encroach into or result in fill within regulated floodplain and floodway areas. ii. Groundwater – aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. There are no known springs, seeps or karst features present in the Project Area. 1) Depth to groundwater: In the vicinity of the Project Area, the depth to groundwater ranges from approximately 40 to 85 feet. Wells in the area primarily utilize the Jordan aquifer or groundwater from the sand and gravel till layers above the Jordan aquifer. 2) MDH Wellhead Protection Area: The Project is not located within an MDH Wellhead Protection Area. The Project Area is an area with low groundwater sensitivity. 3) Onsite or Nearby Wells: No wells were identified within the Project Area according to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Minnesota Well Index (MWI). Per MDH MWI, there are 11 domestic wells located within 500 feet of the Project Area (Table 11); six wells are located to the north, one well is east, two wells are southeast, and two wells are located southwest of the Project Area (Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Well Index, accessed March 16, 2023). Two additional wells have been described by the developer. One associated with the church near the northwest corner of the building. The other associated with the existing home (at Oswald Farm Road/CR 116) located near the southeast corner of the home. A second well associated with this home and located 25 feet south of the existing well was previously capped in recent years. Hope Church Development 20 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Table 11. Verified Wells within 500 feet of the Site Well ID Use Type Location from Site Status Depth (ft.) Static Water Level (ft.) 665817 Domestic North Active 125 85 696183 Domestic North Active 125 55 661568 Domestic North Active 125 55 678242 Domestic North Active 125 59 691852 Domestic North Active 127 60 709877 Domestic North Active 80 40 660563 Domestic East Active 185 52 152502 Domestic Southeast Active 138 60 772680 Domestic Southeast Active 135 37 698097 Domestic Southwest Active 158 70 635280 Domestic Southwest Active 145 66 Source: MDH Minnesota Well Index (MWI), https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/mwi b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. i. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. Wastewater from the Project would not be pretreated prior to entering the system and would be conveyed by a gravity sanitary sewer system to the Elm Creek Interceptor trunk line where it would eventually be discharged to a publicly owned treatment facility (the Metropolitan wastewater treatment plant, St. Paul, Minnesota). Wastewater would be generated by domestic and municipal uses from the proposed residential, retail, medical development, as well as the existing church on site. To adequately serve the Project, the City would extend the existing sewer trunk link that is connected to a Metropolitan Council Environmental Services location and conveys wastewater to the Elm Creek Interceptor at the municipal boundary northeast of the Project site. The capacity of the main sanitary pipe, as planned for within the City’s Comprehensive Plan, was designed to accommodate the planned land uses that included a mix of residential, industrial and commercial uses within the northeast planning area. The 2040 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan accountas for other smaller lines to be connected to this main. Internal to the Project Area, each lot would be Hope Church Development 21 Environmental Assessment Worksheet served by a sanitary sewer designed and installed by the developer and permitted by the MPCA. The Project would increase sanitary wastewater flows compared to existing conditions; however, this increase is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. If septic systems are part of the project, describe the availability of septage disposal options within the region to handle the ongoing amounts generated as a result of the project. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity and amount with this discussion. There are two subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS) adjacent to the Project Area - one for the church and one for the existing residence (at Oswald Farm Road/CR 116). Both septic systems would be decommissioned, as the church would be connected to the sanitary sewer system and the single-family residence would be removed. MPCA requirements for removing abandoned SSTS would be followed during the decommissioning of the systems. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. The wastewater discharge from the Project Area would not discharge to a surface water. ii. Stormwater - Describe changes in surface hydrology resulting from change of land cover. Describe the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the project site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss environmental effects from stormwater discharges on receiving waters post construction including how the project will affect runoff volume, discharge rate and change in pollutants. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity and amount with this discussion. For projects requiring NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater permit coverage, state the total number of acres that will be disturbed by the project and describe the stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), including specific best management practices to address soil erosion and sedimentation during and after project construction. Discuss permanent stormwater management plans, including methods of achieving volume reduction to restore or maintain the natural hydrology of the site using green infrastructure practices or other stormwater management practices. Identify any receiving waters that have construction-related water impairments or are classified as special as defined in the Construction Stormwater permit. Describe additional requirements for special and/or impaired waters. The majority of the Project Area is currently farmland, grassland, and forest which allows stormwater to infiltrate directly into the ground or run into the wetlands onsite. There is one stormwater pond to the northwest of the church facility that provides volume and rate control for runoff from the church buildings and parking lots. The existing residence does not have specialized stormwater treatment; stormwater runs off overland and infiltrates into the ground. Hope Church Development 22 Environmental Assessment Worksheet The Project would increase the amount of impervious surface present in the Project Area and the volume of stormwater. Approximately 43 acres (total Project Area minus trees that would be preserved) would be disturbed during the construction of the Project and 17.3 acres of impervious surface would be added to the Project Area, based on the current site plan (Figure 3, Appendix A). The stormwater would be directed to several stormwater ponds and biofiltration basins in the Project Area; these would provide treatment to remove pollutants from the stormwater and control the rate of stormwater runoff being discharged to comply with local and state standards, including Elm Creek Watershed requirements. After stormwater runs through the stormwater ponds and biofiltration basins and has been treated, it would be directed into onsite Wetlands 2 and 3. Currently, Minnesota climate trends are projecting an increase in rainfall frequency and intensity which would be factored into the stormwater design for the site. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) would be prepared as part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Permit required for the project. The SWPPP would conform to permit requirements and address sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction. Sediment and erosion control BMPs may include bio-rolls, silt fence, rock construction entrances, inlet protection devices, erosion control blankets, erosion stabilization mats, and/or other similar devices to prevent soil erosion and sediment transport. Disturbed areas specified to be revegetated would be restored with final stabilization per permit requirements. iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Discuss how the proposed water use is resilient in the event of changes in total precipitation, large precipitation events, drought, increased temperatures, variable surface water flows and elevations, and longer growing seasons. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. Describe contingency plans should the appropriation volume increase beyond infrastructure capacity or water supply for the project diminish in quantity or quality, such as reuse of water, connections with another water source, or emergency connections. The Project Area would be connected to the public water supply, though the site is not currently publicly serviced. The City of Corcoran is constructing a new Water Treatment Plant (WTP) to serve the growing community. A new City-owned water tower would be constructed in the Project Area (the water tower project would in part be financed with federal funds and a federal environmental review would be completed for that separate project). Climate Change and Resilience Climate change trends may affect surface water and groundwater interactions that may lead to long-term uncertainty regarding surface and groundwater levels, resulting in impacts to groundwater supply availability, quality, and quantity. Surface and groundwater quantity is driven by the balance of atmospheric input from precipitation and losses due to evapotranspiration.15 The City has undertaken an extensive water supply planning process as part 15 DNR. Climate’s Impact on Water Availability. Updated October 19, 2021 https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/water_availability.html Hope Church Development 23 Environmental Assessment Worksheet of the proposed WTP. The City has completed a Northeast Water Supply Feasibility Study and is closely coordinating with regulatory agencies on the development of the proposed WTP. The City would be subject to the conditions of the DNR Water Appropriation Permit. iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed and identify those probable locations. Wetland impacts are anticipated as part of the proposed development. The Project design sought to avoid and minimize wetland impacts and mitigate for unavoidable wetland impacts. The Project Area excludes the adjacent property where Wetlands 2 and 3 are located, the largest wetlands in the immediate area. Direct or indirect impacts are expected to Wetlands 1, 4, 5, & 6 because of grading which would either fill the wetlands or alter the hydrology to the wetlands. Impacts to these wetlands are difficult to avoid due to the size and nature of the wetlands. Wetlands 1 and 6 are farmed wetlands with marginal hydrology. Alterations to the surrounding landscape are likely to adversely impact the hydrology of these wetlands. Similarly, Wetlands 4 and 5 are small and also vulnerable to surrounding landscape alterations. Anticipated wetland impacts could total 1.2 acres. All necessary wetland permitting would be obtained prior to any wetland impacts occurring. Impacts would be regulated under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) as administered by the City of Corcoran as WCA LGU. Additionally, the U.S Army Corps of Engineers would regulate impacts to jurisdictional wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Any wetland impacts requiring mitigation would be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio through the purchase of wetland bank credits. Credits would be purchased from the same Major Watershed and Bank Service Area, as credit availability permits, and would be purchased using the siting prioritization in the WCA. The City of Corcoran must approve the proposed wetland impacts and plan for replacement before any impacts occur. Additionally, the Corps of Engineers must issue a jurisdictional determination. If any of the impacted wetlands are Corps jurisdictional, a permit would be required. The wetland impacts are expected to have minimal effect on the host watershed, as the total impact area is not large, and the existing wetlands are low quality farmed wetlands or small seasonally flooded basins. The replacement wetlands in the wetland bank would be much higher quality wetlands and better able to provide ecosystem services than the existing, low- quality wetlands. Hope Church Development 24 Environmental Assessment Worksheet b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. There are not any anticipated impacts or alterations to surface water features as a result of the Project. Appropriate BMPs such as silt fences, inlet protection, and other sediment and erosion control measures would be taken to avoid and minimize sedimentation in downstream waterbodies. The Project would not change the number or type of watercraft on any local waterbodies. 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes a. Pre-project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre-project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. A review of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) What’s in My Neighborhood (WIMN) database 16 was conducted to identify documented potentially contaminated sites within or in the vicinity of the Project Area. One site was identified within the Project Area and two sites were identified within one-half mile of the Project Area. Table 12 summarizes MPCA potentially contaminated sites within the Project Area and within a one-half mile buffer of the Project Area. Figure 11, Appendix A illustrates the location of potentially contaminated sites within and in close proximity to the Project. Table 12. MPCA Potentially Contaminated Sites within a One-Half Mile of the Project Area Site Name Site ID MPCA Program Status Approx. Distance from Project Area (ft.) Direction in Relation to Project Area Within the Project Area Kiphuth Residence 187436 Petroleum Remediation, Leak Site Inactive (Leak Report 1995, site closed 1997) 650 North 16 MPCA. Undated. What’s in My Neighborhood. Available at: What's in My Neighborhood | Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (state.mn.us). Accessed. April 2022. Hope Church Development 25 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Site Name Site ID MPCA Program Status Approx. Distance from Project Area (ft.) Direction in Relation to Project Area Within One-Half Mile of the Project Area Hope Community Church Cemetery 135487 Construction Stormwater (C00033395) Active (coverage issuance 2012- 2023) 0 NA Lithgow Automotive Inc 95746 Hazardous Waste (MNR000118828) Inactive (registered 2003- 2020) 400 North An additional review of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) WIMN database 17 was conducted to identify documented potentially contaminated sites within or in the vicinity of the Project Area. No records were identified with the Project Area or within a half-mile buffer. The MPCA identified the Hope Community Church Cemetery (135487) within the Project Area. During the construction of the Project, this site would be fenced off, contractors would be verbally informed of its existence and the site would be clearly identified in contractors materials including plan sheets, so that the site would not be exposed or exacerbated by the construction of the Project. In the event that potentially contaminated soils or other potentially hazardous materials are encountered during construction, plans would be developed to properly handle and treat contaminated soil and/or groundwater. Any contaminated soils or other potentially hazardous materials encountered during construction would be handled and disposed of in accordance with MPCA and any other applicable requirements. a. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. Construction Waste Construction wastes would be typical of multifamily housing, senior living, commercial/retail, and medical office developments. Construction wastes would be primarily non-hazardous and would be managed as municipal solid waste (MSW) or construction/ demolition debris. Hazardous wastes in the form of used oils/lubricants, waste paints, or other materials may be generated during construction. The contractor would be required to manage and dispose of all construction-generated waste in accordance with MPCA requirements and all other applicable regulatory requirements. Construction wastes would either be recycled or stored in approved containers and disposed of in the proper facilities. Any excess soil material that is not suitable for use onsite would become the property of the contractor and would be disposed of properly. All solid waste would be managed according to MPCA and other regulatory requirements. Operational Waste The Project would generate solid waste during operation of the development, which is anticipated to include retail, medical, multifamily housing, and single-family housing. Solid waste generated during 17 MDA. 2022. What’s in My Neighborhood? - Agricultural. Available at: https://app.gisdata.mn.gov/mda-agchem/. Accessed. April 2022. Hope Church Development 26 Environmental Assessment Worksheet operation of the development would be typical of waste generated by these type of land uses and would be primarily managed as mixed MSW. The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) provides a list of estimated solid waste generate rates for office, industrial, service, and other establishments for general planning purposes18. For the residential land uses, the following estimated solid waste generation 12 lbs/housing unit/day. This along with an estimated office/warehouse solid waste generation rate of 1.42 lbs/100 square feet/day results in an estimated 2,806 tons of MSW per year. The collection of MSW would be managed by a waste hauler licensed by the City of Corcoran. The Project would adhere to all MPCA requirements and other regulations pertaining to the use, handling, and disposal of solid waste. Recycling areas would be provided in compliance with the Minnesota State Building code. b. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. The Project is not anticipated to include permanent chemicals/hazardous materials storage or use during its operation. No above- or below-ground storage tanks are planned for permanent use within the Project Area. If this changes, a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures plan would be prepared by a licensed Minnesota Professional Engineer pursuant to federal regulations. Construction equipment may require the limited use of potentially hazardous materials, such as gasoline or diesel fuels, engine motor oils, hydraulic fluids, and other lubricants. Vehicles responsible for the transportation of hazardous materials would be equipped with spill kits for rapid response to any spills and refueling procedures would be implemented to eliminate leakage. Additionally, all fuels, oils, and lubricants would be stored in containment apparatuses while not in use or when being stored. Construction staff would be trained to spot and appropriately respond to potential spills. In the event that a leak or spill incident occurs, the contractor would be required to respond in accordance with MPCA containment and remedial action procedures. A Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures plan would be prepared by a Minnesota Professional Engineer pursuant to federal regulations. c. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling. It is not anticipated that the Project would generate or require storage of hazardous wastes during its construction or operation. Item12.c describes the potential storage and use of hazardous materials during construction and operation of the Project. 14. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. 18 CalRecycle. 2019. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Available at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates. Accessed April 2022. Hope Church Development 27 Environmental Assessment Worksheet The Project resides within Hennepin County and is within an ecological area classified as the Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province, Minnesota and Northeast Iowa Morainal Section, and Big Woods Subsection. Most of the Big Woods Subsection (approximately 75 percent) is cropland, with the remaining land consisting of pasture, upland forest, and wetlands. Historically, oak woodland and maple-basswood forest were common throughout the Big Woods Subsection. Vegetation consisted primarily of deciduous forest species, such as elm (Ulmus spp.), American basswood (Tilia americana), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), ironwood (Ostrya virginiana), bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa), northern red oak (Q. rubra), white oak (Q. alba), and aspen (Populus spp.). (DNR 2000)19. The Project Area and immediately adjacent properties consist of developed land associated with the Hope Community Church, a farmstead, agricultural fields, grass/shrubs, forested areas, wetlands, and ponds (Figure 3, Appendix A). Low density residential areas and a golf course are also nearby. These features could provide habitat for wildlife species, such as deer, raccoons, foxes, coyotes, rabbits, squirrels, mice, passerines and other common birds, raptors, various reptiles, amphibians, and fish. b. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (x) and/or correspondence number (ERDB ) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results. State Listed Species and Significant Communities Under Stantec’s Limited License to Use Copyrighted Material (LA-2022-23) related to Rare Features Data, the DNR Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) was searched in March 2023 to identify species and significant ecological communities within the Project Area and within a one-mile radius of the Project Area. No species records were identified within the Project Area. One species record was identified immediately south of the Project Area: the loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus; endangered). Loggerhead shrike The loggerhead shrike is associated with open landscapes, such as native upland grasslands, and is mostly restricted to areas that were historically prairie or oak savanna in the state of Minnesota. Other potential habitats include pastures, old fields, shelterbelts, farmyards, and cemeteries. This bird can be seen perching at a variety of sites, including hedgerows, shrubs, and small trees. Sites with thorned vegetation, such as honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), and hawthorns (Crataegus spp.), or barbed wire are useful as this species is carnivorous and impales prey. Finally, this species can occur in agricultural areas and non-native grasslands where there is short grass vegetation and perching sites available. (DNR 2022a)20. The Project Area contains grass/shrub habitat that may support the loggerhead shrike. Minimal tree removal is anticipated to be required as part of the Project. Therefore, the Project may impact the loggerhead shrike. Coordination with the DNR may be needed to avoid impacts to this species. It is unknown whether the loggerhead shrike has used the subject properties for nesting in the past, or whether it would find the present conditions suitable. Post construction, the Project would include an extensive landscape and planting plan to revegetate the site. Care would be taken to select plant species that are native to the area including approved native seed mixes, or that are hardy and would withstand the 19 DNR. 2000. Ecological Classification System. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/ecs/index.html. Accessed March 2023. 20 DNR. 2022a. Rare Species Guide. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/index.html. Accessed March 2023. Hope Church Development 28 Environmental Assessment Worksheet climate. Native plant communities and sites of biodiversity and ecological significance No native plant communities, sites of biodiversity significance, or regionally significant ecological areas (RSEA) were identified within the Project Area. Three RSEA were identified within a one-mile radius of the Project Area. These sites are ranked as either moderate, high, or outstanding in significance. A highly ranked site and a moderately ranked site are located approximately 0.35 miles and 0.75 miles west of the Project Area, respectively, and one outstanding site is located approximately one mile south of the Project Area. None of these sites are anticipated to be impacted as part of the proposed Project. Federally Listed Species The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool (USFWS 2023)21 was reviewed in April 2023 to identify federally listed species that have the potential to occur within the Project Area. Four species were identified from this review: the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis; endangered), the tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus; proposed endangered), the whooping crane (Grus americana; non-essential experimental population), and the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus; candidate). The IPaC results are included in Appendix E (IPaC). Northern long-eared bat Suitable roosting, forage, and travel habitat for northern long-eared bat (NLEB) in the summer consists of a wide variety of contiguous forested and wooded habitats with varying tree density and amounts of canopy closure. While roosting, NLEB is generally found in deep crevices in areas such as forests and woodlots (i.e., live trees and/or snags greater than or equal to three inches in diameter at breast height that have exfoliating bark, cracks, crevices, and/or cavities) as well as linear features such as fence rows, riparian forests, and other wooded corridors. NLEB roosts in both live trees and snags. (Sasse and Perkins 199622; Foster and Kurta 1999 23; Owen et al. 2003 24). Additional summer habitat for the NLEB consists of areas adjacent to wooded areas, namely emergent wetlands and edges of agricultural fields, old fields, and pastures. The NLEB has also been observed roosting in human-made structures, such as buildings, barns, bridges, and bat houses. (USFWS 2022a)25. During winter months, NLEB hibernate in caves or abandoned mines (Foster and Kurta 1999)17. Hennepin County is listed as a county with documented white-nose syndrome (WNS) (WNS Response Team 2023 26 and DNR 2020 27). According to the DNR NHIS database, no known roost trees or hibernacula are in the Project Area or within a one-mile radius of the Project Area. The DNR and USFWS maintain a list of townships containing documented NLEB maternity roost trees and/or hibernacula entrances. Based on a review of this list, occupied hibernacula are absent within 0.25 miles and no known 21 USFWS. 2023. Information for Planning and Consultation. Available at: https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/. Accessed March 2023. 22 Sasse, D.B., and P.J. Pekins. 1996. Summer roosting ecology of northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis) in the White Mountain National Forest. Bats and forests symposium. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Working Paper 23:91-101. 23 Foster, R.W. and A. Kurta. 1999. Roosting ecology of the northern bat. (Myotis septentrionalis) and comparisons with the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). Journal of Mammalogy 80:659-672. 24 Owen et al. 2003. Homerange size and habitat use by the northern Myotis (Myotis septentrionalis). American Midland Naturalist 150: 352-359. 25 USFWS. 2022a. Rangewide-Wide Indiana Bat & Northern Long-Eared Bat Survey Guidelines. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/media/range-wide-indiana-bat-and-northern-long-eared-bat-survey-guidelines. Accessed March 2023. 26 WNS Response Team. 2023. Where is WNS Now? Available at: https://www.whitenosesyndrome.org/where-is-wns. Accessed March 2023. 27 DNR. 2020. White-nose Syndrome and Minnesota’s Bats. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/wns/index.html. Accessed April 2023. Hope Church Development 29 Environmental Assessment Worksheet occupied maternity roost trees occur with 150 feet of the Project (DNR and USFWS 2021)28. Suitable habitat (contiguous forested area) is absent within the Project Area. The Project Area contains some wind break trees but is primarily shrubs that would not provide suitable roosting habitat. The Project Area also contains emergent wetlands, ponds, agricultural edges, and structures that could be used for foraging or roosting but given the growth of residential and developed areas in and around the Project Area, the use of these areas by the NLEB is unlikely. Tree clearing is anticipated to be required as part of the Project. Hope Community Church intends to complete tree/shrub removal during the inactive season (November 15 to March 31) to avoid the NLEB active season (April 1 to November 15) and NLEB pupping season (June 1 to July 31). In the event any tree clearing occurs during the active season, the Project Proposer commits to hiring a qualified party to determine the presence or absence of the species prior to such activity. Therefore, the Project would have no effect on the NLEB. The reclassification of the NLEB from threatened to endangered and the nullification of the Final 4(d) Rule took effect on March 31, 2023 (USFWS 2023b)29. Tricolored bat During the non-hibernating seasons, tricolored bats will roost in live and dead leaf clusters of live or dead deciduous hardwood trees. Tricolored bats have also been observed roosting in artificial structures such as barns, bridges, roofs, and other concrete structures. During the winter, tricolored bats hibernate in caves and mines. If mines or caves are not present within the region, they have been observed hibernating in road-associated culverts, tree cavities, and abandoned water wells. (USFWS 2022b)30. Suitable habitat in the form of deciduous hardwood trees is present within the Project Area. Minor tree clearing is anticipated for the Project during the bat inactive season. Therefore, the Project may impact this species, but it is recommended that the Project be reassessed for potential effects when a final listing status is determined. If tree clearing during the active season cannot be avoided, the developer would hire a qualified party to determine the presence or absence of the species. Whooping crane The whooping crane is a migratory bird species that once nested in northern prairies, but now breeds in remote northern forests in Canada as well as in an experimental population in Wisconsin, preferably within coniferous habitat containing swamps and nearby lakes or ponds. Winter habitat consists of coastal marshes (e.g., Texas, Louisiana, and Florida). The diet of the whooping crane is not well known in summer months, but it is thought to be similar to their wintering diet of shellfish, frogs, snakes, insects, small fish, and plant matter like roots and berries. (National Audubon Society undated)31. The Project is within the range of a known, non-essential experimental population of whooping cranes. If this species is found within Minnesota, it is highly likely to be from this experimental population from Wisconsin that is non-migratory. Whether part of a natural or experimental population, Minnesota is out of the Central Flyway used by this species, so there is no concern for stopover sites within the Project Area. Additionally, Minnesota is not located within a known wintering or breeding ground for this 28 DNR and USFWS. 2021. Townships containing documented northern long-eared bat (NLEB) maternity roost trees and/or hibernacula entrances in Minnesota. Available at: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/ereview/minnesota_nleb_township_list_and_map.pdf. Accessed March 2023. 29 USFWS. 2023b. Effective date to reclassify northern long-eared bat as endangered extended. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/press- release/2023-01/effective-date-reclassify-northern-long-eared-bat-endangered-extended. Accessed January 2023. 30 USFWS. 2022b. Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus). U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Available: Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (fws.gov). Accessed January 2023. 31 National Audubon Society. undated. Guide to North American Birds: Whooping Crane. Available at: https://www.audubon.org/field- guide/bird/whooping-crane. Accessed April 2023. Hope Church Development 30 Environmental Assessment Worksheet species. Suitable habitat (prairies, coniferous swamps, lakes, ponds, or coastal marshes) is not present within the Project Area. Wetland features and a small pond are present within the Project Area, but these areas are isolated within an area dominated by active agriculture and development with minimal coniferous tree canopy. Finally, the Project does not overlap any USFWS or National Park Service lands. As such, impacts are not anticipated for this species. Monarch butterfly The monarch butterfly is a migratory butterfly that exists in two main populations within the United States divided by the Rocky Mountains: the eastern population that overwinters in the mountains of Mexico, and the western population that overwinters along the southern pacific coast of California (United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] Forest Service undated)32. Monarch butterflies are a widespread species found in fields, prairies, savannahs, and most places where their host plant, milkweeds (Asclepias spp.), occur throughout the United States and southern Canada. This species generally occurs in areas with high densities of nectar sources. During late summer and during migration, adults use nectar species such as black-eyed Susan (Rudbeckia hirta), narrow-leaved coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia), and rough blazing star (Liatris aspera) (DNR 2022b)33. However, the presence of milkweeds is required for breeding habitat as it is the only plant on which the larvae can feed (National Wildlife Federation undated)34. Given the level of disturbance from active agriculture and development, suitable habitat (nectar sources and milkweed) for the monarch butterfly is likely not present or highly limited within the Project Area. Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), a nectar source, was identified in the Project Area during the wetland delineation (Fall 2022). Undocumented nectar sources and/or milkweed may also be present in the grassland areas found within the Project Area. Therefore, impacts to the monarch butterfly may occur within the Project Area. It is recommended that the effects be reassessed when a listing status is revisited for this species. c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the project including how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. State Listed Species and Significant Communities Loggerhead shrike Suitable habitat for the loggerhead shrike (grass/shrub) is located within the Project Area. Therefore, the proposed Project may impact this species if it exists on the site. According to the 2010 State of the Birds Report on Climate Change conducted by the North American Bird Conservation Initiative (NABCI), the effects of warming temperatures on the loggerhead shrike have not been thoroughly investigated, but their assessment indicated a low vulnerability (NABCI 2010)35. However, given the carnivorous diet of this species, it could be impacted by prey availability given the 32 United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] Forest Service. undated. Migration and Overwintering. Available at: https://www.fs.fed.us/wildflowers/pollinators/Monarch_Butterfly/migration/. Accessed November 2021. 33 DNR. 2022b. Butterfly Gardens. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/gardens/butterfly/index.html. Accessed March 2022. 34 National Wildlife Federation. undated. Monarch Butterfly. Available at: https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife- Guide/Invertebrates/Monarch-Butterfly. Accessed December 2021. 35 NABCI, U.S. Committee. 2010. The State of the Birds 2010 Report on Climate Change, United States of America. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior. http://www.stateofthebirds.org/2010/pdf_files/State of the Birds_FINAL.pdf. Accessed January 2023. Hope Church Development 31 Environmental Assessment Worksheet various vulnerabilities of other bird, reptile, insect, and small mammal species to climate change (The Cornell Lab of Ornithology 2023)36. Native plant communities and sites of biodiversity and ecological significance No native plant communities, sites of biodiversity significance, or RSEA are located within the Project Area, and no impacts are anticipated for the three RSEA located within one mile of the Project Area. While no impacts are anticipated on the Project level, as discussed in Section 7 Climate Adaptation and Resilience, the warmer and wetter conditions expected in Minnesota as a result of climate change are expected to impact these communities. These diverse communities are made up of many species, with some having higher tolerances to heat and moisture than others. If the habitat becomes unsuitable for some species, it could change the dynamics within the entire community. Federally Listed Species Northern long-eared bat Contiguous forested habitat is not present within the Project Area, as such, the Project is anticipated to have no effect on the NLEB. The Project Area is over 0.25 miles from a known, occupied hibernaculum. No known maternity roosts occur within 150 feet of the Project and Hope Community Church intends to conduct minimal tree clearing during the NLEB inactive season (November 15 to March 31). If tree clearing during the active season cannot be avoided, the developer would hire a qualified party to determine the presence or absence of the species. As discussed in Section 7, Minnesota’s climate is trending warmer with more extreme precipitation events. Changes in temperature and precipitation may influence the NLEB’s available suitable roosting and foraging habitat, as well as prey availability (USFWS 2022c)37. Although a less significant stressor compared to white-nose syndrome, climate change variables may negatively affect the NLEB (USFWS 2022d)38. Tricolored bat The Project may impact the tricolored bat due to the presence of suitable habitat (deciduous hardwood trees) within the Project Area and the plan to clear minimal trees. This species is proposed as federally endangered, so impacts should be reassessed when a listing status is finalized. The tricolored bat is susceptible to climate change. For instance, areas that are experiencing more intense rainfall, such as Minnesota, may also see decreased foraging behavior from the tricolored bat along with decreased insect availability (USFWS 2021)39. Whooping crane The Project Area does not contain suitable habitat (prairies, coniferous swamps, lakes, ponds, or coastal marshes) that could support the whooping crane and it is located outside of the Central Flyway used by 36 The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2023. All About Birds – Loggerhead Shrike Life History. Available at: https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Loggerhead_Shrike/lifehistory. Accessed January 2023. 37 USFWS. 2022c. Northern Long-Eared Bat Overview. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/species/northern-long-eared-bat-myotis- septentrionalis. Accessed September 2022. 38 USFWS 2022d. Proposed Rule 87 FR 16442: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-06168. Accessed January 2023. 39 USFWS. 2021. Species Status Assessment Report for the Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus). Version 1.1. Page iii. USFWS Northeast Region. Hadley, MA. Available at: https://fws.gov/species/tricolored-bat-perimyotis-subflavus. Accessed February 2023. Hope Church Development 32 Environmental Assessment Worksheet this species. Wetland features and a small pond are located in the Project Area, but these areas are isolated in an area dominated by active agriculture and development with minimal coniferous tree canopy. Individuals found in Minnesota would be from a non-essential experimental population in Wisconsin that is non-migratory. Therefore, impacts are not anticipated for the whooping crane as a result of the Project. According to Audubon, this already rare species is highly vulnerable to climate change; given an imminent 1.5-degree Celsius increase in average global temperature if no action is taken, this species would be on track to lose 86 percent of its breeding range and 19 percent of its wintering range (National Audubon Society undated)40. Monarch butterfly Impacts to the monarch butterfly may occur within the Project Area due to the presence of Canada goldenrod and additional grassland that may hold undocumented nectar sources and/or milkweed. This species is a candidate for federal listing; therefore, effects should be reconsidered when a listing status is revisited. As discussed in Section 7, climate change is anticipated to result in increasing temperatures in Minnesota, which may increase the number of days and the area in which monarch butterfly populations will be exposed to unsuitably high temperatures. This can result in them using up fat stores too quickly at their overwintering sites and may result in them incorrectly judging when to enter and exit states of dormancy (diapause). (Kobilinksy 2019)41. Invasive Species Noxious weeds and invasive species in Minnesota are managed through the MDA under Minnesota Statutes Section 18.78, the DNR, and local ordinances. Best management practices (BMPs) during construction activities and operation within the Project Area should be implemented to minimize the introduction or spread of noxious weeds and invasive species. These practices include cleaning vehicles and equipment of mud and dirt from other construction areas, removing seeds that attach to clothing or equipment, minimizing soil disturbance, not moving potentially contaminated materials between sites, and staying on designated roads/trails. (USDA undated 42 and DNR 202343). d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, ecosystems, and sensitive ecological resources. Sightings of any rare species during construction or operation of the Project would be reported to the DNR Nongame Wildlife specialist. Hope Community Church would follow the guidance that is received to avoid impacts. Hope Community Church understands restrictions related to the NLEB and intends to conduct tree clearing during the inactive season (November 15 to March 31) to avoid the NLEB active season (April 1 to November 15) and the NLEB bat pupping season (June 1 to July 31). If tree clearing during the active season cannot be avoided, the developer would hire a qualified party to determine the presence or absence 40 National Audubon Society. undated. Guide to North American Birds: Whooping Crane. Available at: https://www.audubon.org/field- guide/bird/whooping-crane. Accessed April 2023. 41 Kobilinksy, Dana. 2019. Watch: Temperature Drives Internal Clock for Monarchs. The Wildlife Society. Available at: https://wildlife.org/watch-temperature-drives-internal-clock-for-monarchs/. Accessed September 2022. 42 USDA National Invasive Species Information Center. Undated. Best Management Practices. Available at: https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/subject/best-management-practices. Accessed January 2023. 43 DNR. 2023. Terrestrial Invasive Species. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/invasives/terrestrial/index.html. Accessed January 2023. Hope Church Development 33 Environmental Assessment Worksheet of the species. Hope Community Church plans to utilize native seed mixes to buffer wetlands and ponds as part of their landscaping efforts. 15. Historic Properties Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted regarding the presence of architectural or archaeological resources. Cultural and archaeological resource are not present within the proposed expansion site. 16. Visual Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. The Project Area and adjacent properties currently consists of a church, cemetery, agriculture, a barn, and a single-family home. The Project Area itself is vacant. No designated scenic views or vistas are present in the vicinity of the Project. The landscape immediately surrounding the site consists of a single-family residential neighborhood to the north and farmland or vacant land to the south, east, and west. The primary visual impact would the transition of views from undeveloped, agricultural and large lot rural residential to buildings, parking lots, and stormwater basins. The Project is not expected to include industries that would emit vapor plumes. The Project Area is zoned by the City of Corcoran as General Mixed Use and Public/Institutional. The Project would be required to adhere to the City of Corcoran’s ordinance requirements including building height and form, landscape screening, and lighting. The existing tree lines and vegetation along sections of the Project Area would partially serve as a buffer for nearby residents. Tree removal and wetland impacts would be minimized to the extent possible primarily around the edges of the Project Area. Additional vegetative screening may be added, where appropriate. 17. Air a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the project’s effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. The Project is not anticipated to include any stationary sources emissions. Hope Church Development 34 Environmental Assessment Worksheet b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the project’s traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project’s vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. The Project Area is located in a Carbon Monoxide (CO) maintenance area. The Project is expected to generate increased vehicular traffic, which would result in a relatively small increase in CO emissions and other vehicle related emissions. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) developed a CO hot spot screening method designed to identify intersections that may result in CO emissions that exceed air quality standards. MnDOT’s screening method assumes that intersections with a total daily traffic volume exceeding 82,300 vehicles per day may result in potential CO impacts that exceed air quality standards. A traffic impact study was completed for the Project, which is discussed in Item 20 of this EAW. Based on this study, the roadways in and surrounding the Project Area would not experience traffic volumes exceeding 82,300 vehicles per day. Therefore, it is not anticipated that vehicle emissions generated by the project would have the potential to significantly impact CO air pollution. c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 17a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. The Project is not anticipated to produce dust or odors during its operation, but it may generate temporary dust and odors during construction. Sensitive receptors to these dusts and odors would include residents surrounding the Project Area. Potential odors would likely be associated with exhaust from diesel engines and fuel storage. Dust generated during construction would be minimized through standard dust control measures such as applying water to exposed soils and limiting the duration of exposed soils to the extent possible. Dust levels after construction is complete would be minimal as all surfaces would be paved or revegetated. With these mitigations in place, the quality of life for nearby residences is not anticipated to be affected. 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint a. GHG Quantification: For all proposed projects, provide quantification and discussion of project GHG emissions. Include additional rows in the tables as necessary to provide project-specific emission sources. Describe the methods used to quantify emissions. If calculation methods are not readily available to quantify GHG emissions for a source, describe the process used to come to that conclusion and any GHG emission sources not included in the total calculation. The GHG emissions for the Project are calculated using the Simplified Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculator (SGEC) tool and are based on the methodologies for developing a carbon footprint described in Minnesota Environmental Quality Board’s (EQB’s) Revised EAW Guidance (January 2022). Table 13 shows the emission categories for project carbon footprint calculations, as provided in the EQB Guidance. Table 13. Emission Categories for Carbon Footprint Hope Church Development 35 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Category Scope Project Phase Type of Emissions Direct Emissions Scope 1 Operations Combustion (Stationary, Area, Mobile Sources) Scope 1 Operations Non-Combustion Processes Scope 1 Construction Combustion (Mobile Sources) Scope 1 Construction Land-Use Indirect Emissions Scope 2 Operations Off-site Electricity/Steam Production (Market-Based and Location-Based) Scope 3 Operations Off-site Waste Management Atmospheric Removal of GHGs Scope 1 (Sinks) Construction/Operations Land-Use (CO2 removals to terrestrial storage) A description of the carbon footprint associated with the Project is provided below. Construction Emissions GHG emissions from construction are associated with fuel combustion in the mobile construction equipment and on-road vehicles. The assumed construction schedule is five (5) years to complete the Project. For on-road vehicles (commuting construction workers, dump trucks and semi-trucks), emissions are calculated by estimating the number of vehicles, miles traveled, gallons of fuel used (using default mileage rates), and emission factors from the U.S. EPA’s Emission Factors Hub (https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub, updated April 2022). For off-road vehicles, the quantity and horsepower of cranes, backhoes, loaders, bulldozers, excavators, and skid steers was estimated based on similar projects. The default fuel consumption rate of 0.05 gallons per horsepower-hour 44 is used to determine the fuel usage for all equipment. Similar to the on-road vehicles, emission factors from the Emission Factors Hub are used to calculate GHG emissions. Per EQB’s Revised EAW Guidance, total construction emissions to construct the Project are divided by the lifetime of the project, estimated to be 50 years. Operational Emissions – Mobile Sources Average daily trips associated with the proposed Project are provided in Table 14. Table 14. Average Trips per Day Activity Trips/Day Multi-Family Unit Residents 1,543 Senior Living Residents (includes 55+ housing, senior 1,628 44 Based on South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Table A9-3E. Hope Church Development 36 Environmental Assessment Worksheet housing, senior villas, and row townhomes) Retail Facilities (two coffee shops, two fast-casual restaurants, and strip retail) 2,794 Medical Facilities 3,181 Deliveries (assumes heavy duty diesel trucks) 15 Total 9,161 It is conservatively assumed that these trips are five (5) miles each and take place for 365 days per year. Gas mileage for light duty vehicles (residents, retail and medical) is estimated based on the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Average Fuel Efficiency for Light Duty Vehicles. Delivery trucks are assumed to be heavy-duty diesel trucks. Gas mileage for the diesel trucks are based on U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration data from 2019. GHG emissions associated with these trips are calculated using the Emission Factors Hub. Operational Emissions – Stationary Combustion The projected natural gas usage for the buildings associated with the Project is estimated using the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS, 2012 – released May 2016). The CBECS provides natural gas intensities in standard cubic feet per square foot per year for several different building activity categories. Natural gas combustion GHG emissions are calculated using emission factors from the Emission Factors Hub. Operational Emissions – Offsite Electricity Production Similar to natural gas usage, electricity needs for the proposed buildings are estimated using the CBECS, which provides electricity usage intensity in kilowatt-hours per square foot of building space. GHG emissions occur offsite (Scope 2) when the electricity is generated. The SGEC tool calculates GHG emissions from electricity generation on a regional basis (defined by U.S. EPA using data from the EIA and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC))45, using average emission factors based on the mix of fuels used to generate the electricity in each region. For this project, the Midwest Reliability Organization West (MROW) region is used. The electricity generation in MROW is comprised of approximately 50 percent fossil fuels (coal and natural gas), nine percent nuclear and approximately 40 percent renewables (hydro, wind, and solar). Operational Emissions - Waste Management GHG emissions from waste management are associated with the waste generation, transportation to landfill, equipment use at landfill and fugitive landfill methane emissions (based on typical landfill gas collection practices and average landfill moisture conditions). For this Project, emissions are provided for residential waste only. The waste generation for the medical and retail facilities are not included as no reliable waste data source was identified. Estimates were made for the number of residents per unit for each of the housing types: multi-family housing – four residents, senior housing and 55+ housing – one resident, and villas and row townhomes – two residents. The total number or residents was estimated to be 1,832. 45 https://www.epa.gov/egrid Hope Church Development 37 Environmental Assessment Worksheet A default waste generation rate of 4.9 pounds per person per day was obtained from the U.S. EPA’s Fact Sheet, 2018 – Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling and Disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2018. Conservatively applying this rate to the number of residents yields a waste generation rate of 1,638 tons per year. GHG emissions are estimated based on emission factors from the U.S. EPA’s Waste Reduction Model (WARM). Carbon Sequestration Associated with Land Use Changes As prescribed by the EQB’s Draft EAW Guidance, GHG emissions associated with changes in land use are quantified using the Chapter 6: Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, of the U.S. EPA’s Inventory of Sources and Sinks of Greenhouse Gases 46, which provides an assessment of greenhouse gas fluxes resulting from land use and land use change in the U.S. The term “flux” describes the exchange of carbon dioxide to and from the atmosphere. A negative flux is a removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, or carbon sequestration. For this Project, GHG emissions were calculated for the following proposed land use changes: Wetland to Settlement (developed areas consisting of a mix of lawns and other grassy areas, trees, landscaping and impervious surfaces), Forest to Settlement, Cropland to Wetland (i.e. stormwater pond), and Cropland to Settlement. The net increase in CO2e associated with the losses of carbon sinks is estimated at 355 tons per year. Summary A summary of GHG emissions are provided in Table 15. Emissions are presented in tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalent, which takes into account each GHG’s global warming potential (GWP). Detailed emission calculations are provided in Appendix G Greenhouse Gas Analysis Calculations. Table 15. GHG Emissions Summary (CO2e in short tons per year) Scope Source GHG Emissions (ton/yr of CO2e) Direct Emissions Scope 1 Construction – Mobile Sources 683 Scope 1 Operations – Stationary Combustion (Natural Gas) 1,325 Scope 1 Operations – Mobile Sources 7,138 Indirect Emissions Scope 2 Operations – Purchased Electricity 3,358 Scope 2 Operations – Waste Management 954 46 https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks Hope Church Development 38 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Atmospheric Removal of GHGs Scope 1 – Sinks Land Use* 355 Total 13,813 * Positive number reflects net gain in emissions due to loss of carbon sequestration from the land. b. GHG Assessment i. Describe any mitigation considered to reduce the project’s GHG emissions. Mitigation Considerations The following possible activities may be considered to help mitigate the project’s GHG emissions: • Minimize grading, incorporating existing topography into the site design. • Elimination of invasive species and replacing with native grasses and plants. • Keeping as many existing trees as possible. • Re-using surface water collected in ponds for irrigation. • Utilizing best management practices (BMPs) to conserve water, preserve water quality, limit pesticide and fertilizer applications and habitat management. • Energy efficient lighting in buildings and parking lots. • Use of energy efficient building materials. • Installation of energy efficient appliances, windows and heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units. • Use of renewable energy sources ii. Describe and quantify reductions from selected mitigation, if proposed to reduce the project’s GHG emissions. Explain why the selected mitigation was preferred. Reductions from Selected Mitigation The mitigation measures above may help offset the GHG emissions from the Project, but were not explicitly quantified in this analysis. The Project’s GHG emissions (without mitigation) are conservatively estimated to be those presented in Table 15. iii. Quantify the proposed projects predicted net lifetime GHG emissions (total tons/#of years) and how those predicted emissions may affect achievement of the Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act goals and/or other more stringent state or local GHG reduction goals. Net Lifetime GHG Emissions and Effect on State and Local Emissions Goals The project lifetime is estimated at 50 years. Thus, the lifetime emissions associated with the project are approximately 690,648 tons of CO2e. This conservative total may be offset by the mitigation measures noted above. The project’s GHG emissions would have minimal effect on the State of Minnesota’s or the local area’s GHG reduction goals. 19. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project Hope Church Development 39 Environmental Assessment Worksheet construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. 1) Existing noise levels/sources in the area Existing noise sources include vehicle traffic along CSAH 30 and County Road (CR) 116, agricultural land use, and activities associated with Hope Community Church, which is generally situated in the center of the Project Area. 2) Nearby sensitive receptors The noise receptors nearest to the Project Area include the residential areas immediately north of the Project Area on the south side of Hunters Ridge and the residential areas immediately east of the existing Hope Community Church, across CR 116. The closest residential homes are approximately 100-200 feet from the Project Area, along the northern boundary of the Project Area. 3) Conformance to State noise standards The Project would minimize noise disturbances caused by the construction of the Project to the extent possible and would adhere to the noise regulations outlined in Minnesota State Statute 7030.0030 and Corcoran City Ordinances 1060.090 and 82.03 subpart 5 (MPCA 2015 and City of Corcoran Municipal Code 2022)16,47. The regulations state that construction activities are prohibited between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. on weekends and federal holidays. (MPCA 2015)6. 4) Quality of life The Project would consist of multifamily housing, senior living, commercial/retail, and medical office uses that would not emit noise levels exceeding state noise standards. Construction of the Project would temporarily result in elevated noise levels. Construction noise would be temporary and would adhere to local ordinance requirements. No construction or operation hours would occur during nighttime hours. Construction equipment would be properly muffled and maintained in working order. This Project is not anticipated to affect the quality of life for nearby residents. The Project would be required to adhere to State and city noise regulations. 20. Transportation a. Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. 1) Existing parking spaces: 224 Proposed parking spaces: Approximately 1,786 2) Total average daily traffic generated: 8,231 trips per day 47 MPCA 2015. Noise rules in Minnesota. Available at: A Guide to Noise Control in Minnesota (state.mn.us). Accessed March 2022. Hope Church Development 40 Environmental Assessment Worksheet 3) Maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence: 774 trips during p.m. peak hour (4:30- 5:30 p.m.) 4) Source of trip generation rates: Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers 5) Availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes: There are no transit routes or pedestrian facilities in the Project area. b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project’s impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance. A complete Traffic Impact Study with existing and future volumes is included in the Appendix H. This appendix includes relevant figures including existing traffic volumes, future peak traffic volumes, proposed development layout, and access locations. c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. The following mitigation measures are recommended at each intersection: o CSAH 30/CR 116 Short term – Construct dedicated westbound right lane 300 feet in length. Long term – No additional improvements needed. o CR 116/Hunters Ridge Short term – Construct planned northbound and southbound left and right turn lanes on CR 116. Widen eastbound and westbound Hunters Ridge approaches to provide a 200- foot left turn lane and a through/right turn lane. Long term – No additional improvements needed. o CSAH 30/access Short term – Construct 300-foot eastbound left turn and westbound right turn lanes on CSAH 30. Construct southbound approach with 200-foot left turn and right turn lanes. Long term – No additional improvements needed. 21. Cumulative Potential Effects (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. While the market would ultimately drive the phasing of the Project, it is anticipated that multifamily and senior housing would ultimately lead this development due to current market conditions, and Hope Church Development 41 Environmental Assessment Worksheet utility availability. From that point, it is anticipated that the retail and commercial spaces would begin to develop, followed by/or along with subsequent housing phases. There are no other projects in the surrounding area that are known to be in construction, operation, or planned; and therefore, could not be considered in the cumulative potential effects. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. As referenced in Item 12.b.iii., the City of Corcoran is constructing a new Water Treatment Plant to serve the growing community. The new City-owned water tower would be constructed in southern portion of the Hope Community Development Project Area. Note: the water tower project would in part be financed with federal funds and a separate (federal) environmental review would be completed for that project. It is the City of Corcoran’s intent to have the water tower in operation by year end 2024. There is one other development that we considered as a part of this response and that is the Amberley and Bellwether developments approximately 0.25-mile to the northeast (north of Hunters Ridge and east of CR 116). This will be a residential development with approximately 400 homes. A majority of the homes are within the Bellwether portion of the developments, which is an age- restricted community. Construction of the development is underway and full build-out is anticipated for 2024. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet was completed for this project when it was known as “Encore” in 2018. In discussions with City of Corcoran, no other reasonably foreseeable future projects were identified in the Project Area (as described in Item 21.a.). c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. In reviewing the Hope Community Development Project and the new City-owned water tower project, the cumulative potential effect would be limited to the conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural land. The water tower project would impact 1.2 acres of agricultural land, that along with the Hope Community Development Project’s 16.8 acres of conversion (refer to Table 3 Cover Types) would account for a total conversion of approximately 18 acres in Corcoran, Minnesota. Similar to the cumulative potential effects of the Hope Community Development Project and the City- water tower project, the previously approved Amberly and Bellwether developments will also result in a conversion of agricultural land. These previously approved developments were part of the Encore EAW completed prior to construction. Agricultural land will be replaced with impervious surface area (i.e., rooftops and paved surfaces). Both developments will manage stormwater per local and state requirements. Additionally, the City worked with the developers to consider landscaping for the built condition. The developments will introduce new traffic to the local roadway system, and their independent traffic analysis, study and recommendations were used to plan for any necessary safety or operation improvements. 22. Other Potential Environmental Effects If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerLegend Project Area Existing Development Under Seperate Review Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec 3. Background: USGS Rodgers 7.5 Minute Quadrangle (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW Project Location USGS Topo Map 1 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ $+30 $+101 $+117 $+116 97thP l DuffneyDr95 t h Ave 100th Ave Hillside Dr ZirconLaSchutte F a r m R d AlvaradoLaNCherryLaRobertLaHidden P onds Dr Jackie La Schutt e La101st Ave Country Rd Darrel La Patrick Pl Hunt e r s Rdg Dassel La OswaldFarmRdShannon La Schutte Rd O a k d a l e D r Rush Mea d o w La Su n n y Hill L a Mystique Dr 93rd Ave N Br a ndywineRdCain RdStieg Rd2 1 11 12 1314 T120 R23W T119 R23W T119 R23WT119 R22WMaple Grove Corcoran DaytonRogers Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerLegend Project Area Existing Development Under Seperate Review Municipal Boundary PLSS Boundary Metro Region Trails/Bikeways Trail Status Planned Existing Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec, MnGeo, MnDNR, MnDOT 3. Background: 2020 color 7-county (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW Project Location Aerial Map 2 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title"($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerProject Area Existing Development Under Seperate Review Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec, MnGeo 3. Background: Sambatek (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:3,000 0 125 250 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW Site Plan Concept 3 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ $+30 $+116 Hunters Rdg O s w a ldFarmRdDisclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerLegend Project Area Existing Development Under Seperate Review Page 1 of 1 <ita><bol><und>Notes</und></bol></ita> <bol>1. </bol>Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet <bol>2. </bol>Data Sources: Stantec, Hennepin Co., Sambatek <bol>3. </bol>Background: Sambatek & 2020 color 7-county (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:4,200 0 175 350 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW Phasing Plan 4 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ $+30 $+116 Hunters Rdg O s w a ldFarmRdExisting Development Under Seperate Review Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerLegend Project Area TCMA Land Cover 2016 Grass/Shrub Buildings Roads/Paved Surfaces Lakes/Ponds Deciduous Tree Canopy Coniferous Tree Canopy Agriculture Emergent Wetland Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec, Hennepin Co., MnGeo, MnDOT, UMN - Twin Cities 1-Meter Land Cover (2016) 3. Background: 2020 color 7-county (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:4,200 0 175 350 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW Land Cover 5 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ $+116$+30 DuffneyDrHillside DrN Side LaDuffney Cir Darrel La Patrick Pl Hunters Rd g OswaldFarmRdNor t h w e s t T r a i l s Nor t hwestTrail sNorthwestTrailsPHEASANT RUN GOLF CLUB Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerLegend Project Area Existing Development Under Seperate Review Golf Course Snowmobile Trail Metro Region Trails/Bikeways Trail Status Planned Existing Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec, MnGeo, MnDOT, MnDNR 3. Background: 2020 color 7-county (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:12,000 0 500 1,000 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW Parks Trails and Other Recreational Areas 6 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ $+30 $+116 Hunters Rdg O s w aldFarmRdLe Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Nessel loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Klossner muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Canisteo clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Lester loam, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Nessel loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Nessel loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Nessel loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Nessel loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Existing Development Under Seperate Review Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerLegend Project Area Farmland Class All areas are prime farmland Farmland of statewide importance Not prime farmland Prime farmland if drained Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec, MnGeo, MnDOT, NRCS 3. Background: 2020 color 7-county (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:4,800 0 200 400 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW Farmland and Soils Classification 7 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ $+30 $+116 $+101 $+117 Unnamed (27031700) Unnamed (27044000) Unnamed (27031400) Unnamed (27031600)Unnamed (27031500) Unnamed (27044300) Unnamed (27031900) Unnamed (27016300) Unnamed (27031800) MAJ-070129867_BRushCreek(M-062-004)R u shCre ek,SouthFork(M-062-004-002)Un n a m e d Creek(M-062-004-006)Rush Creek 07010206-528 (DO; E.coli; FishesBio; InvertBio) Rush Creek, South Fork 07010206-732 (Cl-; E.coli; FishesBio; InvertBio) Rush Creek 07010206-528 (DO; E.coli; FishesBio; InvertBio) Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerLegend 1 Mile Radius Project Area Existing Development Under Seperate Review !( 2022 MPCA Impaired Streams (Draft) Minnesota Public Waters Delineations Public Water Watercourse Public Ditch/Altered Natural Watercourse Public Waters Basins NHD - Flowline NHD - Waterbody NWI Circular 39 Class 1 - Seasonally Flooded Basin or Flat 2 - Wet Meadow 3 - Shallow Marsh 4 - Deep Marsh 5 - Shallow Open Water 6 - Shrub Swamp 7 - Wooded Swamp Riverine Systems Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec, MnGeo, MnDNR, MnDOT 3. Background: MnGeo 2020 7-county (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW Water Resources Map 8 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ $+30 $+116 Hunters Rdg O s w a ld FarmRdWetland 1 0.89 .ac Wetland 2 1.07 .ac Wetland 3 2.34 .ac Wetland 4 0.08 .ac Wetland 5 0.03 .ac Wetland 6 0.23 .ac Existing Development Under Seperate Review Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerLegend Wetland Delineations Pending LGU Review Project Area Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec, MnGeo, MnDNR, MnDOT, Sambatek 3. Background: 2020 color 7-county (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:4,200 0 175 350 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW Water Resources within the Project Area 9 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ !A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A!A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A!A!A !A!A!A!A !A !A !A !A!A !A!A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A!A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A!A !A 168683 104861 126438 114409 104891 104718 104874 136080 155176 152502 104743 136084 136070 140169 136081 143398 675993 691852 678242 687127 635280 698097 710831 410604 615620 709877 586995 561312 592863 590007 661568 696183 665817 556720435849579135772680 473164 623593 615559 607766 649315 597221660563 606206 405885452548 439790 789690 798008 460068 489032 556705 575826 600814 642303 124999 669299 124983 435820 479960 437205 840775 856408 856401 $+116 $+30 DuffneyDrCherryLa Darrel La Patrick PlHuntersRdgOswaldFarmRdStieg Rd Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerLegend 500 ft Radius 1/2 mi Radius Project Area Existing Development Under Seperate Review Minnesota Well Index !A Domestic !A Public Supply !A Test Well !A Other Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: City of Corcoran, NRCS, MNDOT, MNDOH 3. Background: MnGeo 2020 7-county (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:14,400 0 600 1,200 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW Minnesota Well Index 10 Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ " ! ! ! ! $+116$+30 DuffneyDrHillside Dr Cherr yLaDarrel La Patrick Pl Hunter s R dg Dassel La OswaldFarmRdStieg Rd Amberly Hope Community Church Cemetery Lithgow Automotive Inc Bellwether 7th add Kiphuth Residence Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-05-16 By: kjmuellerLegend Project Area Existing Development Under Seperate Review 1/2 mi Radius MPCA Sites Program Name "Hazardous Waste !Investigation and Cleanup !Stormwater Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Stantec, MnGeo, MnDOT, MPCA 3. Background: MnGeo 2020 7-county (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:14,400 0 600 1,200 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-05-16 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102City of Corcoran, MN Hope Church Development EAW MPCA WIMN Potentially Contaminated Sites 11 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250 Feet Ü SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V, A99 With BFE or DepthZone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mileZone X Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood HazardZone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes.Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Area of Undetermined Flood HazardZone D Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17.5 Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Effective LOMRs Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 3/15/2023 at 5:01 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. Legend OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERAL STRUCTURES OTHER FEATURES MAP PANELS 8 B 20.2 The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. 1:6,000 93°32'59"W 45°8'13"N 93°32'22"W 45°7'48"N Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020 914.8FEET 914.8 FEET 914.8 FEET 914.8 FEET 914. 8 F E E T 91 4 . 8 F E E T %,D %,E %,A %,F %,B %,C %,D %,A %,F %,B %,C 915FE E T915FEET 915 FEET915 FEET 9 1 5 F E E T 915 FEET 914 FEET 915 FEET"# N NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NOTES TO USERS For information and questions about this Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), available products associated with this FIRM, including historic versions, the current map date for each FIRM panel, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Flood Map Service Center website at https://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the website. Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Flood Map Service Center at the number listed above. For community and countywide map dates, refer to the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620. Basemap information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The basemap shown is the USGS National Map: Orthoimagery. Last refreshed October, 2020. SCALE Map Projection: GCS, Geodetic Reference System 1980; Vertical Datum: NGVD29 Panel Contains: MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL PANEL 43 OF 479 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250 Feet 0 100 200 300 40050 Meters This map was exported from FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) on 3/15/2023 5:03 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. For additional information, please see the Flood Hazard Mapping Updates Overview Fact Sheet at https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/118418 This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF ROGERS 270155 270775 0043 0043 27053C0043F November 04, 2016 For information about the specific vertical datum for elevation features, datum conversions, or vertical monuments used to create this map, please see the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report for your community at https://msc.fema.gov SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR DRAFT FIRM PANEL LAYOUT OTHER FEATURES FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V, A99 With BFE or DepthZone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mileZone X Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood HazardZone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee See NotesZone X Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D NO SCREENArea of Minimal Flood HazardZone X Area of Undetermined Flood HazardZone D Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17.5 Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary 8 Effective LOMRs GENERAL STRUCTURES OTHER AREAS OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS B 20.2 1 inch = 500 feet 1:6,000 93°33'45.46"W 45°9'29.12"N 93°31'52.1"W 45°7'23.44"N Review Area Minnesota Unique Well No.CountyHennepinMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHWELL AND BORING RECORDMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031126438Entry DateRogersQuad IDWell NameFULTON, ALTownship119RangeDirWSection2SubsectionDCDDACJordan7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet)QuadWell DepthDepth Completed456893Update14849985123ADepth to BedrockStatic Water LevelElevation945 ft.ftUsedomestic11/03/2015UTM Northing (Y)UTM Easting (X)08/24/1991188 ft.Date Well Completed188 ft.Geological Interpretation01/01/1990Locate MethodField Located ByElev. MethodMinnesota Geological SurveyStatus09/28/1977121ADigitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (DigitizingUniversal Transverse Mercator (UTM) - NAD83 - Zone 15 -Received DateAquiferLic/Reg. No.27056Open HoleUnique No. VerifiedInformation from neighborAndrew RetzlerInput SourceInput DateAgency (Interpretation)Interpretaion Method-ftft100Minnesota Geological SurveyGeologic study 1:24k to 1:100kGeological MaterialFromToColorHardnessThicknessFromToStratigraphyPrimary LithologySecondaryMinor LithologyDepth (ft.)Elevation (ft.)CLAY05757945888clayclaySAND5711053888835sandsandCLAY11014838835797clayclaySHALE14816517797780Jordan SandstonesiltstoneSANDROCK16518823780757Jordan SandstonesandstoneMinnesota Well Index - Stratigraphy ReportPrinted on 03/17/2023126438 Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031126438 County Hennepin Entry Date 08/24/1991 Quad Rogers Update Date 11/03/2015 Quad ID 121A Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed FULTON, AL 119 23 W 2 DCDDAC 188 ft.188 ft.09/28/1977 Elevation 945 ft.Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet)Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Address Use domestic Status Active Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To ThreadedCasing Type Single casing No Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint C/W 20042 HILLSIDE DR CORCORAN MN 55374 Geological Material From To (ft.)Color Hardness CLAY 0 57 SAND 57 110 CLAY 110 148 SHALE 148 165 SANDROCK 165 188 Stratigraphy Information Casing Diameter Weight 4 181in. To ft.lbs./ft. stainlessScreen?Make JOHNSONXType Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 2 in.ft.181 188 ft.ft. Open Hole From ft.To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) Material FromAmount To bentonite ft.ft. Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 126438 HE-01205-15 Printed on 03/17/2023 Pitless adapter manufacturer Model At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above grade AERMOTOR X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.100 Measureland surface 09/28/1977 ft.110 hrs.3 Pumping at 20 g.p.m. feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion?X Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. 10/13/1977 0.5 126 Submersible Yes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No.Name of Driller Torgerson Well Co.27056 Remarks Jordan Sandstone Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock Jordan Sandstone Minnesota Geological Survey Jordan 148 Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Table) System X Y456893 4998517 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 01/01/1990Information from Angled Drill Hole Minnesota Unique Well No.CountyHennepinMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHWELL AND BORING RECORDMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031140169Entry DateRogersQuad IDWell NameFELIX, D.E.Township119RangeDirWSection2SubsectionDDCBDDJordan7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet)QuadWell DepthDepth Completed456996Update14149985623ADepth to BedrockStatic Water LevelElevation935 ft.ftUsedomestic11/03/2015UTM Northing (Y)UTM Easting (X)08/24/1991167 ft.Date Well Completed167 ft.Geological Interpretation01/01/1990Locate MethodField Located ByElev. MethodMinnesota Geological SurveyStatus05/03/1978121ADigitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (DigitizingUniversal Transverse Mercator (UTM) - NAD83 - Zone 15 -Received DateAquiferLic/Reg. No.27086Open HoleUnique No. VerifiedAndrew RetzlerInput SourceInput DateAgency (Interpretation)Interpretaion Method-ftft55Minnesota Geological SurveyGeologic study 1:24k to 1:100kGeological MaterialFromToColorHardnessThicknessFromToStratigraphyPrimary LithologySecondaryMinor LithologyDepth (ft.)Elevation (ft.)CLAY030MEDIUMYELLOW30935905clay-yellowclayCLAY3060MEDIUMBLUE30905875clay-grayclaySAND6072SOFTBROWN12875863sand-brownsandCLAY W/ ROCK72141MEDIUMRED69863794pebbly sand/silt/clay-claygravelSHALE141155MEDIUMRED/BLU14794780Jordan SandstonesiltstoneSANDROCK155167SOFTLT. BRN12780768Jordan SandstonesandstoneMinnesota Well Index - Stratigraphy ReportPrinted on 03/17/2023140169 Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING REPORT Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031140169 County Hennepin Entry Date 08/24/1991 Quad Rogers Update Date 11/03/2015 Quad ID 121A Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed FELIX, D.E.119 23 W 2 DDCBDD 167 ft.167 ft.05/03/1978 Elevation 935 ft.Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet)Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Address Use domestic Status Active Well Hydrofractured?Yes No From To Threaded 1 ft. Casing Type Single casing No X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe? Joint C/W 20039 HILLSIDE AV CORCORAN MN 55374 Geological Material From To (ft.)Color Hardness CLAY 0 30 MEDIUMYELLOW CLAY 30 60 MEDIUMBLUE SAND 60 72 SOFTBROWN CLAY W/ ROCK 72 141 MEDIUMRED SHALE 141 155 MEDIUMRED/BLU SANDROCK 155 167 SOFTLT. BRN Stratigraphy Information Casing Diameter Weight 4 162 11in. To ft.lbs./ft. Hole Diameter 6.7 162in. To ft. 4 167in. To ft. stainlessScreen?Make JOHNSONXType Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 3 12in.ft.1625 167 ft.ft. Open Hole From ft.To ft. Static Water Level Pumping Level (below land surface) Material FromAmount To bentonite ft.0 162 ft. cuttings ft.ft. Wellhead Completion Pump Nearest Known Source of Contamination Abandoned Variance Well Contractor Minnesota Well Index Report 140169 HE-01205-15 Printed on 03/17/2023 Pitless adapter manufacturer Model At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Casing Protection 12 in. above gradeX FLINT & WALLING X Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? Grouting Information Well Grouted?Yes No Not Specified No ft.55 Measureland surface 05/03/1978 ft.60 hrs.3 Pumping at 35 g.p.m. 50 feet East Direction Septic tank/drain field Type Well disinfected upon completion?X Yes Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe Capacity Typftg.p. 05/04/1978 12 BA8 0.5 230 90 Submersible Yes No Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well?Yes No Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No.Name of Driller Ruppert & Son 27086 RUPPERT, G. Remarks Jordan Sandstone Miscellaneous Last Strat Aquifer Depth to Bedrock Located by Locate Method First Bedrock Jordan Sandstone Minnesota Geological Survey Jordan 141 Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Table) System X Y456996 4998561 ft UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters Unique Number Verification Input Date 01/01/1990 Angled Drill Hole IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly a ected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of e ects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-speci c (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-speci c (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS o ce(s) with jurisdiction in the de ned project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. Project information NAME Hope Community EAW LOCATION Hennepin County, Minnesota DESCRIPTION None U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaC Local o ce Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field O ce (952) 858-0793 (952) 646-2873 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of in uence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly a ected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a sh population even if that sh does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water ow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential e ects to species, additional site-speci c and project-speci c information is often required. Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local o ce and a species list which ful lls this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an o cial species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local eld o ce directly. For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an o cial species list by doing the following: 1. Log in to IPaC. 2. Go to your My Projects list. 3. Click PROJECT HOME for this project. 4. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the sheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ). Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ). 2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an o ce of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of 1 2 Commerce. The following species are potentially a ected by activities in this location: Mammals Birds Insects Critical habitats Potential e ects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. There are no critical habitats at this location. You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have e ects on all above listed species. NAME STATUS Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045 Endangered Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub avus Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515 Proposed Endangered NAME STATUS Whooping Crane Grus americana No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/758 EXPN NAME STATUS Monarch Butter y Danaus plexippus Wherever found No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 Candidate Migratory birds The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may nd in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur o the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. BREEDING SEASON Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act . Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. Additional information can be found using the following links: Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take- migratory-birds Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/ les/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation- measures.pdf 1 2 NAME Probability of Presence Summary The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence () Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4- week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey e ort (see below) can be used to establish a level of con dence in the presence score. One can have higher con dence in the presence score if the corresponding survey e ort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in o shore areas from certain types of development or activities. Breeds Dec 1 to Aug 31 Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds May 20 to Jul 31 Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25 Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa avipes This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679 Breeds elsewhere Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Breeds elsewhere no data survey e ort breeding season probability of presence Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. Breeding Season () Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey E ort () Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. To see a bar's survey e ort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. No Data () A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas o the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Bobolink BCC Rangewide (CON) Chimney Swift BCC Rangewide (CON) Lesser Yellowlegs BCC Rangewide (CON) Rusty Blackbird BCC - BCR Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my speci ed location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and ltered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identi ed as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to o shore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my speci ed location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets. Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the pro les provided for each bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe speci ed. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: 1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Paci c Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in o shore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. o shore energy development or longline shing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, e orts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially a ected by o shore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area o the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also o ers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results les underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my speci ed location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey e ort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey e ort is the key component. If the survey e ort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey e ort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to con rm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be con rmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. Facilities National Wildlife Refuge lands Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. There are no refuge lands at this location. Fish hatcheries There are no sh hatcheries at this location. Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Wetland information is not available at this time This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at this location. Data limitations The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identi ed based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classi cation established through image analysis. The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth veri cation work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or eld work. There may be occasional di erences in polygon boundaries or classi cations between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site. Data exclusions Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuber cid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. Data precautions Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may de ne and describe wetlands in a di erent manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to de ne the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modi cations within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning speci ed agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may a ect such activities. Anoka County Hennepin County Wright County ^_ $+30 $+116 $+101 $+117 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\eaw\eaw.aprx Revised: 2023-03-03 By: kjmuellerLegend Project Boundary 1 Mile Radius Central Region Regionally Significant Ecological Areas Moderate High Outstanding Page 1 of 1 <ita><bol><und>Notes</und></bol></ita> <bol>1. </bol>Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N <bol>2. </bol>Data Sources:MN DNR, NHIS <bol3. </bol>Background: 2019 NAIP (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Prepared by KJM on 2023-03-03 Hennepin Co., MN Hope Community EIW Unique and Natural Features Review 1 United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service March 14, 2023 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map..................................................................................................................8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Hennepin County, Minnesota..........................................................................13 L21A—Canisteo clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes.......................................13 L22C2—Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded..............14 L23A—Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes...............................................16 L24A—Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes.......................................17 L36A—Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes...............19 L37B—Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes..................................................21 L40B—Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes..............................23 L44A—Nessel loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes.................................................25 L45A—Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes...........................26 References............................................................................................................29 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report 6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Custom Soil Resource Report 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 4997700499780049979004998000499810049982004998300499840049977004997800499790049980004998100499820049983004998400456800 456900 457000 457100 457200 457300 457400 456800 456900 457000 457100 457200 457300 457400 45° 8' 16'' N 93° 32' 58'' W45° 8' 16'' N93° 32' 30'' W45° 7' 50'' N 93° 32' 58'' W45° 7' 50'' N 93° 32' 30'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 Meters Map Scale: 1:4,000 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 6, 2022 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 11, 2020—May 19, 2020 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L21A Canisteo clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0.6 1.1% L22C2 Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 7.0 13.0% L23A Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 8.2 15.2% L24A Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 4.0 7.4% L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 3.8 7.0% L37B Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 19.4 35.8% L40B Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 0.0 0.0% L44A Nessel loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 8.7 16.1% L45A Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 2.4 4.4% Totals for Area of Interest 54.1 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different Custom Soil Resource Report 11 management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 Hennepin County, Minnesota L21A—Canisteo clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2vvdm Elevation: 690 to 1,840 feet Mean annual precipitation: 24 to 37 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 140 to 180 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Canisteo and similar soils:75 percent Minor components:25 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Canisteo Setting Landform:Rims on depressions, ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf Down-slope shape:Concave, linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Fine-loamy till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: clay loam A - 9 to 16 inches: clay loam AB - 16 to 20 inches: clay loam Bkg - 20 to 36 inches: clay loam Cg - 36 to 79 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 0 to 8 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:25 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Ecological site: R103XY001MN - Loamy Wet Prairies Forage suitability group: Level Swale, Calcareous (G103XS009MN) Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Calcareous (G103XS009MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Custom Soil Resource Report 13 Minor Components Okoboji Percent of map unit:13 percent Landform:Depressions Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Ecological site:R103XY015MN - Depressional Marsh Other vegetative classification:Ponded If Not Drained (G103XS013MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Harps Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Rims on depressions Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R103XY009MN - Calcareous Rim Prairies Other vegetative classification:Level Swale, Calcareous (G103XS009MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Webster Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R103XY001MN - Loamy Wet Prairies Other vegetative classification:Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Glencoe Percent of map unit:2 percent Landform:Depressions Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Ecological site:R103XY015MN - Depressional Marsh Other vegetative classification:Ponded If Not Drained (G103XS013MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes L22C2—Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2ttc4 Elevation: 690 to 1,840 feet Mean annual precipitation: 24 to 37 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 140 to 180 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Custom Soil Resource Report 14 Map Unit Composition Lester, moderately eroded, and similar soils:85 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Lester, Moderately Eroded Setting Landform:Ground moraines, hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder, backslope Landform position (three-dimensional):Interfluve, rise Down-slope shape:Convex Across-slope shape:Linear, convex Parent material:Fine-loamy till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loam Bt - 6 to 38 inches: clay loam C - 38 to 79 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope:6 to 10 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 47 to 63 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Storden, moderately eroded Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional):Rise Down-slope shape:Convex, linear Across-slope shape:Linear, convex Ecological site:R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Other vegetative classification:Sloping Upland, Calcareous (G103XS010MN) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 15 Le sueur Percent of map unit:3 percent Landform:Hillslopes, ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit Landform position (three-dimensional):Interfluve, talf Down-slope shape:Convex, linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Other vegetative classification:Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No Hamel Percent of map unit:2 percent Landform:Ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Down-slope shape:Concave, linear Across-slope shape:Linear, concave Ecological site:F103XY030MN - Wet Footslope/Drainageway Forests Other vegetative classification:Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes L23A—Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: h4xf Elevation: 800 to 1,080 feet Mean annual precipitation: 23 to 35 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 124 to 200 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Cordova and similar soils:85 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Cordova Setting Landform:Drainageways on moraines Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Till Typical profile Ap,AB - 0 to 13 inches: loam Btg - 13 to 33 inches: clay loam Cg - 33 to 80 inches: loam Custom Soil Resource Report 16 Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20 to 0.60 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 6 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Gypsum, maximum content:1 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Ecological site: F103XY027MN - Loamy Wet Forests Forage suitability group: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Minor Components Glencoe, depressional Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Depressions on moraines Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Ecological site:R103XY015MN - Depressional Marsh Other vegetative classification:Ponded If Not Drained (G103XS013MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Nessel Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Moraines Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:F103XY025MN - Loamy Upland Forests Other vegetative classification:Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No L24A—Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2tsjr Elevation: 690 to 1,840 feet Mean annual precipitation: 24 to 37 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 140 to 180 days Custom Soil Resource Report 17 Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Glencoe and similar soils:80 percent Minor components:20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Glencoe Setting Landform:Depressions Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Parent material:Local alluvium over till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: clay loam A - 9 to 39 inches: clay loam Bg - 39 to 50 inches: clay loam Cg - 50 to 79 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Very poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately low to high (0.06 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 0 to 6 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:Occasional Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Ecological site: R103XY015MN - Depressional Marsh Forage suitability group: Ponded If Not Drained (G103XS013MN) Other vegetative classification: Ponded If Not Drained (G103XS013MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Minor Components Okoboji Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Depressions Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Ecological site:R103XY015MN - Depressional Marsh Other vegetative classification:Ponded If Not Drained (G103XS013MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Webster Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Ground moraines Custom Soil Resource Report 18 Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R103XY001MN - Loamy Wet Prairies Other vegetative classification:Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Canisteo Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Rims on depressions, ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf Down-slope shape:Concave, linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R103XY001MN - Loamy Wet Prairies Other vegetative classification:Level Swale, Calcareous (G103XS009MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes L36A—Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2tsjx Elevation: 690 to 1,840 feet Mean annual precipitation: 24 to 37 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 140 to 180 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Hamel, overwash, and similar soils:50 percent Hamel and similar soils:43 percent Minor components:7 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Hamel, Overwash Setting Landform:Ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Down-slope shape:Concave, linear Across-slope shape:Linear, concave Parent material:Colluvium over till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 12 inches: loam A - 12 to 26 inches: loam Btg - 26 to 48 inches: clay loam Cg - 48 to 79 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope:1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Custom Soil Resource Report 19 Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 12 to 24 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 11.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Ecological site: F103XY029MN - Footslope/Drainageway Forests Forage suitability group: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Hamel Setting Landform:Ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Down-slope shape:Concave, linear Across-slope shape:Linear, concave Parent material:Colluvium over till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 10 inches: loam A - 10 to 24 inches: loam Btg - 24 to 46 inches: clay loam Cg - 46 to 79 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 0 to 8 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Ecological site: F103XY030MN - Wet Footslope/Drainageway Forests Forage suitability group: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Custom Soil Resource Report 20 Minor Components Terril Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Footslope, toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R103XY011MN - Footslope/Drainageway Prairies Other vegetative classification:Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: No Glencoe Percent of map unit:2 percent Landform:Depressions Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Ecological site:R103XY015MN - Depressional Marsh Other vegetative classification:Ponded If Not Drained (G103XS013MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes L37B—Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2syrq Elevation: 690 to 1,840 feet Mean annual precipitation: 24 to 37 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 140 to 180 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Angus and similar soils:80 percent Minor components:20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Angus Setting Landform:Hillslopes, ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit Landform position (three-dimensional):Interfluve, rise Down-slope shape:Convex Across-slope shape:Convex, linear Parent material:Fine-loamy till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 7 inches: loam Custom Soil Resource Report 21 Bt - 7 to 37 inches: clay loam BC - 37 to 50 inches: clay loam C - 50 to 79 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope:2 to 6 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 39 to 51 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Angus, moderately eroded Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Hillslopes, ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional):Interfluve, rise Down-slope shape:Convex Across-slope shape:Convex, linear Ecological site:R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Other vegetative classification:Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No Cordova Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:F103XY027MN - Loamy Wet Forests Other vegetative classification:Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Le sueur Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Hillslopes, ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit Landform position (three-dimensional):Interfluve, talf Down-slope shape:Convex, linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Custom Soil Resource Report 22 Other vegetative classification:Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No L40B—Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: h64l Elevation: 820 to 1,080 feet Mean annual precipitation: 23 to 35 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 124 to 200 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Angus and similar soils:45 percent Kilkenny and similar soils:40 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Angus Setting Landform:Hills on moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Backslope Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loam Bt - 8 to 35 inches: clay loam BC - 35 to 40 inches: clay loam C - 40 to 80 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope:2 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 43 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Gypsum, maximum content:1 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Custom Soil Resource Report 23 Ecological site: R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Kilkenny Setting Landform:Hills on moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit Down-slope shape:Convex Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Glaciofluvial sediments and reworked till over till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 11 inches: clay loam Bt - 11 to 35 inches: clay loam 2Bk,2C - 35 to 80 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope:2 to 6 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20 to 0.60 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 20 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Gypsum, maximum content:1 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Ecological site: F103XY026MN - Clayey Upland Forests Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Lerdal Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Moraines Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:F103XY026MN - Clayey Upland Forests Other vegetative classification:Level Swale, Acid (G103XS005MN) Hydric soil rating: No Mazaska Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Swales on moraines Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Linear Custom Soil Resource Report 24 Ecological site:F103XY028MN - Clayey Wet Forests Other vegetative classification:Level Swale, Acid (G103XS005MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes L44A—Nessel loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: h657 Elevation: 820 to 1,080 feet Mean annual precipitation: 23 to 35 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 124 to 200 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Nessel and similar soils:85 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Nessel Setting Landform:Moraines Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loam Bt - 6 to 38 inches: clay loam C - 38 to 80 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope:1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 30 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Gypsum, maximum content:1 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1 Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: F103XY025MN - Loamy Upland Forests Custom Soil Resource Report 25 Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Cordova Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Drainageways on moraines Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:F103XY027MN - Loamy Wet Forests Other vegetative classification:Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Angus Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Hills on moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Backslope Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Other vegetative classification:Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No L45A—Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: h660 Elevation: 820 to 1,070 feet Mean annual precipitation: 23 to 35 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 124 to 200 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Dundas and similar soils:65 percent Cordova and similar soils:25 percent Minor components:10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Dundas Setting Landform:Moraines Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: silt loam Custom Soil Resource Report 26 E - 9 to 15 inches: loam Btg - 15 to 40 inches: clay loam Cg - 40 to 80 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope:1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20 to 0.60 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 18 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Gypsum, maximum content:1 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Ecological site: R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Forage suitability group: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Cordova Setting Landform:Drainageways on moraines Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Till Typical profile Ap,AB - 0 to 13 inches: loam Btg - 13 to 33 inches: clay loam Cg - 33 to 80 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20 to 0.60 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 6 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:20 percent Gypsum, maximum content:1 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Ecological site: F103XY027MN - Loamy Wet Forests Custom Soil Resource Report 27 Forage suitability group: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Minor Components Nessel Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Moraines Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:F103XY025MN - Loamy Upland Forests Other vegetative classification:Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Hydric soil rating: No Glencoe Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Depressions on moraines Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Ecological site:R103XY015MN - Depressional Marsh Other vegetative classification:Ponded If Not Drained (G103XS013MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Custom Soil Resource Report 28 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 29 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report 30 From:MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO To:Mueller, Kevin Cc:Banks, Benjamin; Bot, Courtnay Subject:RE: Corcoran EAW Lit Search Date:Monday, March 20, 2023 6:50:02 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png image004.png Stantec_Kevin Mueller_Project Area_ALL_Corcoran EAW.zip Hello Kevin, Please see attached. Jim SHPO Data Requests Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office 50 Sherburne Avenue, Suite 203 Saint Paul, MN 55155 (651) 201-3299 datarequestshpo@state.mn.us Notice: This email message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search is only for previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. IN NO CASE DOES THIS DATABASE SEARCH OR EMAIL MESSAGE CONSTITUTE A PROJECT REVIEW UNDER STATE OR FEDERAL PRESERVATION LAWS – please see our website at https://mn.gov/admin/shpo/protection/ for further information regarding our Environmental Review Process. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic/architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or properties may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field surveys, may be necessary to adequately assess the area’s potential to contain historic properties or archaeological sites. Properties that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or have been determined eligible for listing in the NRHP are indicated on the reports you have received, if any. The following codes may be on those reports: NR – National Register listed. The properties may be individually listed or may be within the boundaries of a National Register District. CEF – Considered Eligible Findings are made when a federal agency has recommended that a property is eligible for listing in the National Register and MN SHPO has accepted the recommendation for the purposes of the Environmental Review Process. These properties need to be further assessed before they are officially listed in the National Register. SEF – Staff eligible Findings are those properties the MN SHPO staff considers eligible for listing in the National Register, in circumstances other than the Environmental Review Process. DOE – Determination of Eligibility is made by the National Park Service and are those properties that are eligible for listing in the National Register, but have not been officially listed. CNEF – Considered Not Eligible Findings are made during the course of the Environmental Review Process. For the purposes of the review a property is considered not eligible for listing in the National Register. These properties may This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. need to be reassessed for eligibility under additional or alternate contexts. Properties without NR, CEF, SEF, DOE, or CNEF designations in the reports may not have been evaluated and therefore no assumption to their eligibility can be made. Integrity and contexts change over time, therefore any eligibility determination made ten (10) or more years from the date of the current survey are considered out of date and the property will need to be reassessed. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project’s potential to impact archaeological sites or historic/architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. If you need assistance with a project review, please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson, Environmental Review Specialist @ 651-201- 3285 or by email at kelly.graggjohnson@state.mn.us. The Minnesota SHPO Archaeology and Historic/Architectural Survey Manuals can be found at https://mn.gov/admin/shpo/identification-evaluation/. Please subscribe to receive SHPO notices for the most current updates regarding office hours, accessing research files, or changes in submitting materials to the SHPO. To access historic resource information please visit our webpage on Using SHPO's Files. From: Mueller, Kevin <kevin.mueller@stantec.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 11:18 AM To: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <DataRequestSHPO@state.mn.us> Cc: Banks, Benjamin <Benjamin.Banks@stantec.com>; Bot, Courtnay <Courtnay.Bot@stantec.com> Subject: Corcoran EAW Lit Search Hello, I would like to request a records search for the attached project. Would it also be possible to provide the search results in an access database format? Thank you and please let me know if there are any questions. Kevin Mueller GIS Specialist Mobile: (952) 334-1991 Stantec One Carlson Parkway, Suite 100 Plymouth MN 55447 Scope Source CO2 (ton/yr) CH4 (ton/yr) N2O (ton/yr) CO2e (ton/yr) Scope 1 Construction - Mobile Sources Onroad - Gasoline and Diesel 75 0.001 0.002 75 Scope 1 Construction - Mobile Sources Non-road - Diesel 591 0.05 0.05 607 Scope 1 Operations - Stationary Combustion - Natural Gas 1,302 0.02 0.002 1,325 Scope 1 Operations - Mobile Sources - Gasoline and Diesel 7,106 0.1 0.1 7,138 Scope 2 Purchased Electricity 3,281 0.3 0.05 3,358 Scope 2 Waste - Operations ---954 Scope 1 - Sinks Land Use (CO2 Removals to Terrestrial Storage)355 12,356 0.6 0.20 13,813 Hope Community Church Development Project GHG Emissions Summary Direct Emissions Indirect Emissions Total Atmospheric Removals of GHGs EPA Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator ("the Calculator")August 2022 Access the guide: Help - Data Management Calculator Guidance - Important Information Tool Sheets Calculator Notes The GHG Protocol also provides guidance on calculating emissions from industrial processes. https://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting There are three primary steps in completing a GHG inventory. Each emissions source also has these three steps. https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-inventory-guidance-low-emitters The Calculator uses U.S.-specific cross-sector emission factors from the Emission Factors Hub . Many industrial sectors also have process-related emissions sources that are specific to their sector. EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program provides guidance and tools that can aid in the calculation and reporting of these emissions: (C) Data must be entered in the units specified on the data entry sheets. Use the "Unit Conversions" or "Heat Content" sheets if unit conversion is necessary prior to entering data into the Calculator. Upstream Trans and Dist Quick Data Entry Navigation (2) COLLECT: The second step is to collect data for the defined annual period. This step is typically the most time consuming, since the data can be difficult to gather. This Calculator has help sheets with suggestions and guidance for each emissions source and a general help sheet for data management. Click the drop down menu boxes below to navigate to these sheets. (3) QUANTIFY: The third step is to calculate emissions. This Calculator is designed to complete the emissions quantification step for you. Once the user enters data in this MS Excel spreadsheet, the emissions will be calculated and totaled on the "Summary" sheet. (A) Navigate to the data entry sheets using the drop down menu in the dark grey cell below and then clicking on the "Go To Data Entry Sheet" button. On the data entry sheets enter data in ORANGE cells only. (B) This Calculator has several "Tool Sheets" with useful reference data such as unit conversions, heat contents, and emission factors. Click on the buttons below to go to the appropriate Tool Sheet. The EPA Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator ("the Calculator") is designed as a simplified calculation tool to help organizations estimate and inventory their annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for US-based operations. All methodologies and default values provided are based on the most current Center for Corporate Climate Leadership Greenhouse Gas Inventory Guidance Documents and the Emission Factors Hub . The Calculator will quantify the direct and indirect emissions from sources at an organization when activity data are entered into the various sections of the workbook for one annual period. (1) DEFINE: The first step in completing a GHG inventory is to determine the boundaries and emissions sources included within those boundaries. After you have defined your organizational and operational boundaries, you can use the questions on the "Boundary Questions" worksheet to help you determine which emissions sources are relevant to your business. Go to Boundary Questions (D) If more guidance is needed, you can reference the emission factor data sources found on the "Emission Factors" sheet. Emission sources of all seven major GHGs are accounted for in the inventory and in this Calculator: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). The Calculator allows the user to estimate GHG emissions from scope 1 (direct), scope 2 (indirect), and some scope 3 (other indirect) sources. Before entering data, please: 1) Enable Macros and 2) Familiarize yourself with the Simplified Guide to GHG Management for Organizations. Unit Conversions Heat Content Emission Factors Hope Community Church Development Source ID Description Building Activity Bldg Square Footage Natural Gas Combustion (scf/yr) Electricity Usage (kWh/yr) Multi-Family-A Multi-Family Housing "A"Lodging 43,000 2,119,900 662,200 Retail-B Proposed Retail "B"Retail 10,100 342,390 142,410 Medical-C Proposed Medical "C"Health care 47,000 4,027,900 1,179,700 Medical-D Proposed Medical "D"Health care 43,200 3,702,240 1,084,320 Retail-E Proposed Retail "E"Retail 10,000 339,000 141,000 Multi-Family-F Multi-Family Housing "F"Lodging 51,000 2,514,300 785,400 Senior-G Senior Senior Housing "G"Lodging 56,000 2,760,800 862,400 Senior-H 55+ Housing "H"Lodging 33,100 1,631,830 509,740 Villas-I Villas "I"Lodging 48,000 2,366,400 739,200 Rowhomes-J Rowhomes "J"Lodging 38,535 1,899,776 593,439 Total 379,935 Mobile Source Information Construction Duration 5 Years (estimate)Project Lifetime 50 Years (estimate) Onroad/Off- Road Vehicle Type1 Number of Vehicles per Day2 Fuel Type Vehicle Year1 VMT (miles per day, per vehicle)2 Miles per Gallon3 Fuel Usage (gal/day, all vehicles)Days Per Year4 Miles Traveled (mi/yr, all vehicles) Fuel Usage (gal/yr, all vehicles) Miles Traveled (mi) Fuel Usage (gal)CO2 (kg/gal)CH4 (g/mile)N2O (g/mile) CO2 (short ton) CH4 (short ton) N2O (short ton) CO2e (short ton) CO2 (short ton/yr) CH4 (short ton/yr) N2O (short ton/yr) CO2e (short ton/yr) Onroad Passenger Cars - Laborers (commute)50 Gas 2007 40 22.9 87.47 260 520,000 22,742 2,600,000 113,708 8.78 0.0072 0.0052 1,100.50 0.0206 0.01490 1,105 22.0 0.00041 0.00030 22.109 Heavy Duty Trucks - Dump Trucks (onsite and offsite)20 Diesel 2007 30 7.5 80.11 260 156,000 20,828 780,000 104,139 10.21 0.0095 0.0431 1,172.04 0.0082 0.0371 1,183 23.4 0.00016 0.0007 23.666 Heavy Duty Trucks - Semis (onsite and offsite)20 Diesel 2007 30 6.0 100.00 260 156,000 26,000 780,000 130,000 10.21 0.0095 0.0431 1,463.10 0.0082 0.0371 1,474 29.3 0.00016 0.0007 29.487 Total 3,763 Total 75.3 4. Based on construction schedule of 52 weeks per year, 5 days per week. 5. Emission factors based on the U.S. EPA's Emission Factors Hub (https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub, updated April 2022). Onroad/Offr oad Vehicle Type Number of Vehicles1 Fuel type Engine Size (hp)1 Consumption Rate (gal/hour per hp- hr)2 Hours per Year3 Total Gallons per Year Total Gallons for Project CO2 (kg/gal)CH4 (g/gal)N2O (g/gal) CO2 (short ton) CH4 (short ton) N2O (short ton) CO2e (short ton) CO2 (short ton/yr) CH4 (short ton/yr) N2O (short ton/yr) CO2e (short ton/yr) Off-road Crane 4 Diesel 250 0.05 2,080 104,000 520,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 5852.39 0.539 0.499 6,014 117.0 0.0108 0.0100 120.3 Backhoe 6 Diesel 125 0.05 2,080 78,000 390,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 4389.29 0.404 0.374 4,511 87.8 0.0081 0.0075 90.2 Loader/Bulldozer 8 Diesel 250 0.05 2,080 208,000 1,040,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 11704.78 1.078 0.997 12,029 234.1 0.0216 0.0199 240.6 Excavator 4 Diesel 250 0.05 2,080 104,000 520,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 5852.39 0.539 0.499 6,014 117.0 0.0108 0.0100 120.3 Skid Steer 6 Diesel 50 0.05 2,080 31,200 156,000 10.21 0.94 0.87 1755.72 0.162 0.150 1,804 35.1 0.0032 0.0030 36.1 28 525,200 2,626,000 Total 30,373 Total 607.5 1. Estimate. 2. Off-road mobile source fuel usage based on South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Table A9-3E. 3. Based on construction schedule of 52 weeks per year, 5 days per week, 8 hours per day. 4. Emission factors based on the U.S. EPA's Emission Factors Hub (https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub, updated April 2022). Emissions Annualized over Project Lifetime (50 yrs) 1. Assumed vehicle year 2007 to match the first year a new methodology for gas mileage was developed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The new category Light duty vehicle, short wheel base replaces the old category Passenger car and includes passenger cars, light trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles with a wheelbase (WB) equal to or less than 121 inches. Model Year 2007 is also assumed for heavy duty trucks to allow for use of more conservative GHG emission factors compared to later years. 2. Estimate. Assume passenger cars have 20 mile commute (one-way). Heavy duty trucks vehicle miles traveled includes both onsite and hauling to and from the site during construction. 3. Mileage for passenger cars based upon the U.S. Department of Transportation's Bureau of Transportation Average Fuel Efficiency of Light Duty Vehicles (https://www.bts.gov/content/average-fuel-efficiency-us-light-duty-vehicles). Mileage for dump trucks and semis based on U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2019 (December 2021), Table VM-1. Total Annual Total for Project Emissions Annualized over Project Lifetime (50 yrs)Total Project EmissionsEmission Factors4 Emission Factors5 Total Emissions (ton) Scope 1 Emissions from Stationary Combustion Sources Guidance - Select "Fuel Combusted" from drop down box. (C) Biomass CO2 emissions are not reported in the total emissions, but are reported separately at the bottom of the sheet. Table 1. Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Source Source Source Fuel Quantity ID Description Area (sq ft)Combusted Combusted BLR-012 East Power Plant 12,517 Natural Gas 10,000 MMBtu Multi-FamilyMulti-Family Housing "A"43,000 Natural Gas 2,119,900 SCF Retail-B Proposed Retail "B"10,100 Natural Gas 342,390 SCF Medical-C Proposed Medical "C"47,000 Natural Gas 4,027,900 SCF Medical-D Proposed Medical "D"43,200 Natural Gas 3,702,240 SCF Retail-E Proposed Retail "E"10,000 Natural Gas 339,000 SCF Multi-FamilyMulti-Family Housing "F"51,000 Natural Gas 2,514,300 SCF Senior-G Senior Senior Housing "G"56,000 Natural Gas 2,760,800 SCF Senior-H 55+ Housing "H"33,100 Natural Gas 1,631,830 SCF Villas-I Villas "I"48,000 Natural Gas 2,366,400 SCF Rowhomes Rowhomes "J"38,535 Natural Gas 1,899,776 SCF GHG Emissions Total Organization-Wide Stationary Source Combustion by Fuel Type Quantity Combusted Anthracite Coal 0 short tons Bituminous Coal 0 short tons Sub-bituminous Coal 0 short tons Lignite Coal 0 short tons Natural Gas 21,704,536 scf Distillate Fuel Oil No. 2 0 gallons Residual Fuel Oil No. 6 0 gallons Kerosene 0 gallons Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG)0 gallons Wood and Wood Residuals 0 short tons Landfill Gas 0 scf Total Organization-Wide CO2, CH4 and N2O Emissions from Stationary Source Fuel Combustion CO2 (kg)CH4 (g)N2O (g) Anthracite Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Bituminous Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sub-bituminous Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lignite Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 Natural Gas 1,181,594.9 22,355.7 2,170.5 Distillate Fuel Oil No. 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Residual Fuel Oil No. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Kerosene 0.0 0.0 0.0 Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG)0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Fossil Fuel Emissions 1,181,594.9 22,355.7 2,170.5 Wood and Wood Residuals 0.0 0.0 0.0 Landfill Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Non-Fossil Fuel Emissions 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Emissions for all Fuels 1,181,594.9 22,355.7 2,170.5 Total CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Stationary Combustion 1,182.8 Total Biomass CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Stationary Combustion 0.0 Units (B) If fuel is consumed in a facility but stationary fuel consumption data are not available, an estimate should be made for completeness. See the "Items to Note" section of the Help sheet for suggested estimation approaches. Fuel Type - Enter "Quantity Combusted" and choose the appropriate units from the drop down box in the unit column. If it's necessary to convert units, common heat contents can be found on the "Heat Content" sheet and unit conversions on the "Unit Conversion" sheet. (A) Enter annual data for each combustion unit, facility, or site (by fuel type) in ORANGE cells on Table 1. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ). Fuel Type Units Back to Intro Back to Summary HelpHeat Content EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Direct 1.0)1 of 1 Mobile Source - Operations Onroad/Off- Road Vehicle Type1 Vehicle Driver Daily Trips Fuel Type Vehicle Year2 VMT (miles per trip)3 Miles per Gallon4 Fuel Usage (gal/day, all vehicles) Days Per Year5 Miles per Year (per Vehicle) Miles per Year All Vehicles Fuel Usage (gal/yr, all vehicles)CO2 (kg/gal)CH4 (g/mile)N2O (g/mile) CO2 (short ton/yr) CH4 (short ton/yr) N2O (short ton/yr) CO2e (short ton/yr) Resident 3171 Gas 2007 5 22.9 693.40 365 1,825 5,787,075 253,090 8.78 0.0072 0.0052 2,449 0.05 0.03 2,461 Retail Facilities 2794 Gas 2007 5 22.9 610.96 365 1,825 5,099,050 223,001 8.78 0.0072 0.0052 2,158 0.0405 0.02923 2,168 Medical Facilities 3181 Gas 2007 5 22.9 695.59 365 1,825 5,805,325 253,889 8.78 0.0072 0.0052 2,457 0.0461 0.03328 2,468 Heavy Duty Trucks (Deliveries) Parcel and Supply Deliveries 15 Diesel 2007 5 7.49 10.01 365 1,825 27,375 3,655 10.21 0.0095 0.0431 41 0.000 0.001 42 Total 7,138 1. Assumes members and employees drive gasoline powered light duty vehicles and deliveries are made by heavy duty diesel vehicles. 3. Assumes 5 miles per trip for all vehicles. 5. Assume daily trips take place 365 days per year. Emission Factors6 Emissions Onroad 2. Assumed vehicle year 2007 to match the first year a new methodology for gas mileage was developed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The new category Light duty vehicle, short wheel base replaces the old category Passenger car and includes passenger cars, light trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles with a wheelbase (WB) equal to or less than 121 inches. The new category Light duty vehicle, long wheel base replaces Other 2-axle, 4-tire vehicle and includes large passenger cars, vans, pickup trucks, and sport/utility vehicles with wheelbases (WB) larger than 121 inches. 4. Mileage based upon the U.S. Department of Transportation's Bureau of Transportation Average Fuel Efficiency of Light Duty Vehicles (https://www.bts.gov/content/average-fuel-efficiency-us-light-duty-vehicles). Mileage for delivery trucks based on U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2019 (December 2021), Table VM-1. Light Duty Vehicle, Short Wheel Base (Passenger Cars, small trucks and SUVs) Scope 2 Emissions from Purchase of Electricity Guidance (C) Select "eGRID subregion" from drop box and enter "Electricity Purchased." https://www.epa.gov/egrid/power-profiler#/ Tips: Enter electricity usage by location and then look up the eGRID subregion for each location. Table 1. Total Amount of Electricity Purchased by eGRID Subregion Source Source Source eGRID Subregion Electricity CO2 CH4 N2O CO2 CH4 N2O CO2 CH4 N2O ID Description Area (sq ft)where electricity is consumed Purchased Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions (kWh)(lb/MWh)(lb/MWh)(lb/MWh)(lb)(lb)(lb)(lb)(lb)(lb) Bldg-012 East Power Plant 12,517 HIMS (HICC Miscellaneous)200,000 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 228,640.0 22.0 3.4 Multi-FamilyMulti-Family Housing 43,000 MROW (MRO West)662,200 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>648,624.9 68.9 9.9 648,624.9 68.9 9.9 Retail-B Proposed Retail "B"10,100 MROW (MRO West)142,410 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>139,490.6 14.8 2.1 139,490.6 14.8 2.1 Medical-C Proposed Medical "C 47,000 MROW (MRO West)1,179,700 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>1,155,516.2 122.7 17.7 1,155,516.2 122.7 17.7 Medical-D Proposed Medical "D 43,200 MROW (MRO West)1,084,320 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>1,062,091.4 112.8 16.3 1,062,091.4 112.8 16.3 Retail-E Proposed Retail "E"10,000 MROW (MRO West)141,000 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>138,109.5 14.7 2.1 138,109.5 14.7 2.1 Multi-FamilyMulti-Family Housing 51,000 MROW (MRO West)785,400 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>769,299.3 81.7 11.8 769,299.3 81.7 11.8 Senior-G Senior Senior Housi 56,000 MROW (MRO West)862,400 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>844,720.8 89.7 12.9 844,720.8 89.7 12.9 Senior-H 55+ Housing "H"33,100 MROW (MRO West)509,740 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>499,290.3 53.0 7.6 499,290.3 53.0 7.6 Villas-I Villas "I"48,000 MROW (MRO West)739,200 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>724,046.4 76.9 11.1 724,046.4 76.9 11.1 Rowhomes Rowhomes "J"38,535 MROW (MRO West)593,439 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor>581,273.5 61.7 8.9 581,273.5 61.7 8.9 <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> <enter factor><enter factor><enter factor> Total Emissions for All Sources 6,699,809 6,562,462.9 696.8 100.5 6,562,462.9 696.8 100.5 GHG Emissions CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) Location-Based Electricity Emissions 2,998.2 Market-Based Electricity Emissions 2,998.2 Notes: 1. CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions are estimated using methodology provided in EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership Greenhouse Gas Inventory Guidance - Indirect Emissions from Purchased Electricity (January 2016). Figure 1. EPA eGRID2020, April 2022. (D) See the market-based emission factor hierarchy on the market-based method Help sheet. If any of the first four types of emission factors are applicable, enter the factors in the yellow cells marked as "<enter factor>". If not, leave the yellow cells as is, and eGRID subregion factors will be used for market-based emissions. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ) for a facility that purchases RECs for 100% of its consumption, and therefore has a market-based emission factor of 0. The Indirect Emissions from Purchased Electricity Guidance document provides guidance for quantifying two scope 2 emissions totals, using a location-based method and a market-based method. The organization should quantify and report both totals in its GHG inventory. The location-based method considers average emission factors for the electricity grids that provide electricity. The market- based method considers contractual arrangements under which the organization procures electricity from specific sources, such as renewable energy. - Use map (Figure 1) at bottom of sheet to determine appropriate eGRID subregion. If subregion cannot be determined from the map, find the correct subregion by entering the location's zip code into EPA’s Power Profiler: (A) Enter total annual electricity purchased in kWh and each eGRID subregion for each facility or site in ORANGE cells of Table 1. (B) If electricity consumption data are not available for a facility, an estimate should be made for completeness. See the "Items to Note" section of the Help sheet for suggested estimation approaches. If you purchase renewable energy that is less than 100% of your site's electricity, see the example in the market-based method Help sheet. Location-Based Emission Factors Emissions Emissions Market-Based Use these cells to enter applicable market-based emission factors Back to Intro Back to Summary Help Help - Market-Based Method Help - Market-Based Method EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Indirect 1.0)1 of 1 Hope Community Church Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Land Use Changes Land Use Change1 Description Land Area (acres) Net CO2 Emissions Flux (tons CO2e)2 Total Area Land Use Change (hectares)3 Emission Factor (tons CO2e/acre) Emissions (tons CO2e, negative value represents sink/removal of carbon) Project Lifetime Multiplier (assume 50+ years) Emission Rate (ton/yr) Wetland Remaining Wetland (includes stormwater ponds)4.5 15,800,000 37,658,000 0.17 0.8 1 0.8 Wetland to Settlement 0.2 300,000 46,000 2.64 0.5 1 0.5 Forest to Settlement 6.9 61,500,000 541,000 46.01 317.4 1 317 Impervious Surface Remaining Impervious Surface 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 Cropland to Wetland (Stormwater Pond)4 5,000 440,000 0.005 0.02 1 0.02 Cropland to Settlement Settlement includes developed areas, including residential, industrial, commercial and institutional land. 37.3 5,900,000 2,452,000 0.97 36.3 1 36 Total 57.9 355 Land Use Emissions or Reductions 2. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2020. Net Flux from Soil, Dead Organic Matter and Biomass Carbon Stock Changes. Cropland Converted to Settlements: Table 6-125 Wetland Converted to Settlements: Table 6-125 Forest Converted to Settlements: Table 6-125 Cropland Converted to Wetland: Table 6-87 (Note that value "does not exceed <5,000 tons CO2e") Wetlands Remaining Wetlands: Table 6-1. 3. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2020. Land Use and Land-Use Change for the U.S. Managed Land Base for All 50 States, Table 6-5. 1. Stormwater ponds are not represented in the U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Sources and Sinks: 1990-2020 document. Conservatively assume the stormwater ponds have the same carbon sequestration as wetlands. Settlements Scope 1 Emissions from Mobile Sources Guidance - If mileage or fuel usage is unknown, estimate using approximate fuel economy values (see Reference Table below). - Vehicle year and Miles traveled are not necessary for non-road equiment. Biodiesel Percent:20 % Ethanol Percent:80 % Table 1. Mobile Source Fuel Combustion and Miles Traveled Source Source Vehicle Vehicle Fuel Units Miles ID Description Type Year Usage Traveled Fleet-012 HQ Fleet OnRoad Passenger Cars - Gasoline 2019 500 gal 12,065 Reference Table: Average Fuel Economy by Vehicle Type Passenger Cars 24.1 Motorcycles 44.0 Diesel Buses (Diesel Heavy-Duty Vehicles)7.3 Other 2-axle, 4-Tire Vehicles 17.6 Single unit 2-Axle 6-Tire or More Trucks 7.5 Combination Trucks 6.0 GHG Emissions Total Organization-Wide Mobile Source Fuel Usage and CO2 Emissions (On-Road and Off-Road Vehicles) CO2(kg) Motor Gasoline 0 gallons 0.0 Diesel Fuel 0 gallons 0.0 Residual Fuel Oil 0 gallons 0.0 Aviation Gasoline 0 gallons 0.0 Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel 0 gallons 0.0 Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)0 gallons 0.0 Ethanol 0 gallons 0.0 Note: emissions here are only for the g Biodiesel 0 gallons 0.0 Note: emissions here are only for the d Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)0 gallons 0.0 Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)0 scf 0.0 On-Road or Non-Road? Average Fuel Economy (mpg) Fuel Type Vehicle Type Fuel Usage Units - Enter "Fuel Usage" in appropriate units (units appear when vehicle type is selected). (C) Biomass CO2 emissions from biodiesel and ethanol are not reported in the total emissions, but are reported separately at the bottom of the sheet. (B) When using biofuels, typically the biofuel (biodiesel or ethanol) is mixed with a petroleum fuel (diesel or gasoline) for use in vehicles. Enter the biodiesel and ethanol percentages of the fuel if known, or leave default values. (A) Enter annual data for each vehicle or group of vehicles (grouped by vehicle type, vehicle year, and fuel type) in ORANGE cells in Table 1. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ). Only enter vehicles owned or leased by your organization on this sheet. All other vehicle use such as employee commuting or business travel is considered a scope 3 emissions source and should be reported in the corresponding scope 3 sheets. - Select "Vehicle Type" from drop down box (closest type available). - Select "On-Road" or "Non-Road" from drop down box to determine the Vehicle Types available. Must select before picking vehicle type. Back to Intro Back to Summary Help EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Direct 2.0)1 of 3 Total Organization-Wide On-Road Gasoline Mobile Source Mileage and CH4/N2O Emissions Vehicle Year Mileage (miles)CH4 (g)N2O (g) Passenger Cars - Gasoline 1984-93 0 0.0 0.0 1994 0 0.0 0.0 1995 0 0.0 0.0 1996 0 0.0 0.0 1997 0 0.0 0.0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 1999 0 0.0 0.0 2000 0 0.0 0.0 2001 0 0.0 0.0 2002 0 0.0 0.0 2003 0 0.0 0.0 2004 0 0.0 0.0 2005 0 0.0 0.0 2006 0 0.0 0.0 2007 0 0.0 0.0 2008 0 0.0 0.0 2009 0 0.0 0.0 2010 0 0.0 0.0 2011 0 0.0 0.0 2012 0 0.0 0.0 2013 0 0.0 0.0 2014 0 0.0 0.0 2015 0 0.0 0.0 2016 0 0.0 0.0 2017 0 0.0 0.0 2018 0 0.0 0.0 2019 0 0.0 0.0 Light-Duty Trucks - Gasoline 1987-93 0 0.0 0.0 (Vans, Pickup Trucks, SUVs)1994 0 0.0 0.0 1995 0 0.0 0.0 1996 0 0.0 0.0 1997 0 0.0 0.0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 1999 0 0.0 0.0 2000 0 0.0 0.0 2001 0 0.0 0.0 2002 0 0.0 0.0 2003 0 0.0 0.0 2004 0 0.0 0.0 2005 0 0.0 0.0 2006 0 0.0 0.0 2007 0 0.0 0.0 2008 0 0.0 0.0 2009 0 0.0 0.0 2010 0 0.0 0.0 2011 0 0.0 0.0 2012 0 0.0 0.0 2013 0 0.0 0.0 2014 0 0.0 0.0 2015 0 0.0 0.0 2016 0 0.0 0.0 2017 0 0.0 0.0 2018 0 0.0 0.0 2019 0 0.0 0.0 Heavy-Duty Vehicles - Gasoline 1985-86 0 0.0 0.0 1987 0 0.0 0.0 1988-1989 0 0.0 0.0 1990-1995 0 0.0 0.0 1996 0 0.0 0.0 1997 0 0.0 0.0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 1999 0 0.0 0.0 2000 0 0.0 0.0 2001 0 0.0 0.0 2002 0 0.0 0.0 2003 0 0.0 0.0 2004 0 0.0 0.0 2005 0 0.0 0.0 2006 0 0.0 0.0 2007 0 0.0 0.0 2008 0 0.0 0.0 2009 0 0.0 0.0 2010 0 0.0 0.0 2011 0 0.0 0.0 2012 0 0.0 0.0 2013 0 0.0 0.0 2014 0 0.0 0.0 2015 0 0.0 0.0 2016 0 0.0 0.0 2017 0 0.0 0.0 2018 0 0.0 0.0 2019 0 0.0 0.0 Motorcycles - Gasoline 1960-1995 0 0.0 0.0 1996-2019 0 0.0 0.0 Vehicle Type EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Direct 2.0)2 of 3 Total Organization-Wide On-Road Non-Gasoline Mobile Source Mileage and CH4/N2O Emissions Vehicle Type Fuel Type Vehicle Year Mileage (miles)CH4 (g)N2O (g) 1960-1982 0 0 0 1983-2006 0 0 0 2007-2019 0 0 0 1960-1982 0 0 0 1983-2006 0 0 0 2007-2019 0 0 0 1960-2006 0 0 0 2007-2019 0 0 0 Methanol 0 0.0 0.0 Ethanol 0 0.0 0.0 CNG 0 0.0 0.0 LPG 0 0.0 0.0 Biodiesel 0 0.0 0.0 Ethanol 0 0.0 0.0 CNG 0 0.0 0.0 LPG 0 0.0 0.0 LNG 0 0.0 0.0 Biodiesel 0 0.0 0.0 CNG 0 0.0 0.0 LPG 0 0.0 0.0 LNG 0 0.0 0.0 Biodiesel 0 0.0 0.0 Methanol 0 0.0 0.0 Ethanol 0 0.0 0.0 CNG 0 0.0 0.0 LPG 0 0.0 0.0 LNG 0 0.0 0.0 Biodiesel 0 0.0 0.0 Methanol 0 0.0 0.0 Ethanol 0 0.0 0.0 CNG 0 0.0 0.0 LPG 0 0.0 0.0 LNG 0 0.0 0.0 Biodiesel 0 0.0 0.0 Total Organization-Wide Non-Road Mobile Source Fuel Usage and CH4/N2O Emissions Vehicle Type Fuel Type Fuel Usage (gallons)CH4 (g) N2O (g) Residual Fuel Oil - - - Gasoline (2 stroke)- - - Gasoline (4 stroke)- - - Diesel - - - Locomotives Diesel - - - Jet Fuel - - - Aviation Gasoline - - - Gasoline (2 stroke)- - - Gasoline (4 stroke)- - - Diesel - - - LPG - - - Gasoline - - - Diesel - - - Gasoline (2 stroke)- - - Gasoline (4 stroke)- - - Diesel - - - LPG - - - Gasoline - - - Diesel - - - Gasoline (2 stroke)- - - Gasoline (4 stroke)- - - Diesel - - - LPG - - - Gasoline - - - Diesel - - - LPG - - - Gasoline (2 stroke)- - - Gasoline (4 stroke)- - - Diesel - - - LPG - - - Gasoline (2 stroke)- - - Gasoline (4 stroke)- - - Diesel - - - Gasoline - - - Diesel - - - LPG - - - Gasoline (2 stroke)- - - Gasoline (4 stroke)- - - Diesel - - - LPG - - - Total CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Mobile Sources 0.0 Total Biomass CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Mobile Sources 0.0 Notes: 1. Average mpg values from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2019 (December 2021), Table VM-1. Ships and Boats Aircraft Agricultural Equipment Heavy-Duty Trucks Buses Light-Duty Cars Light-Duty Trucks Medium-Duty Trucks Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles - Diesel Passenger Cars - Diesel Diesel Light-Duty Trucks - Diesel Diesel Industrial/Commercial Equipment Logging Equipment Railroad Equipment Recreational Equipment Agricultural Offroad Trucks Construction/Mining Equipment Construction/Mining Offroad Trucks Lawn and Garden Equipment Airport Equipment EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Direct 2.0)3 of 3 Tool Sheet: Emission Factors All emission factors sourced from EPA's Emission Factors Hub, April 2022. Unless otherwise noted. Fuel emission factors presented represent the combustion-only emissions (e.g., tank-to-wheel) https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/center-corporate-climate-leadership-ghg-emission-factors-hub Stationary Combustion Emission Factors (Used for Steam and Stationary Combustion) Fuel Type CO2 Factor (kg / mmBtu) CH4 Factor (g / mmBtu) N2O Factor (g / mmBtu) CO2 Factor (kg / Unit) CH4 Factor (g / unit) N2O Factor (g / unit) Unit Natural Gas 53.06 1.0 0.10 0.05444 0.00103 0.00010 scf Distillate Fuel Oil No. 2 73.96 3.0 0.60 10.21 0.41 0.08 gallons Residual Fuel Oil No. 6 75.10 3.0 0.60 11.27 0.45 0.09 gallons Kerosene 75.20 3.0 0.60 10.15 0.41 0.08 gallons Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG)61.71 3.0 0.60 5.68 0.28 0.06 gallons Anthracite Coal 103.69 11 1.6 2,602 276 40 short tons Bituminous Coal 93.28 11 1.6 2,325 274 40 short tons Sub-bituminous Coal 97.17 11 1.6 1,676 190 28 short tons Lignite Coal 97.72 11 1.6 1,389 156 23 short tons Mixed (Electric Power Sector)95.52 11 1.6 Coal Coke 113.67 11 1.6 Wood and Wood Residuals 0 7.2 3.6 1,640 126 63 short tons Landfill Gas 0 3.2 0.63 0.02525 0.001552 0.000306 scf Mobile Combustion Emission Factors CO2 Emissions for Road Vehicles Fuel Type CO2 Emission Factor (kg CO2 / unit) Unit Motor Gasoline 8.78 gallon Diesel Fuel 10.21 gallon Residual Fuel Oil 11.27 gallon Aviation Gasoline 8.31 gallon Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel 9.75 gallon Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG)5.68 gallon Ethanol (100%)5.75 gallon Biodiesel (100%)9.45 gallon Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)4.50 gallon Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)0.05444 scf CH4 and N2O Emissions for Highway Vehicles Vehicle Type Year CH4 Factor (g / mile) N2O Factor (g / mile) Gasoline Passenger Cars 1984-93 0.0704 0.0647 1994 0.0617 0.0603 1995 0.0531 0.0560 1996 0.0434 0.0503 1997 0.0337 0.0446 1998 0.0240 0.0389 1999 0.0215 0.0355 2000 0.0175 0.0304 2001 0.0105 0.0212 2002 0.0102 0.0207 2003 0.0095 0.0181 2004 0.0078 0.0085 2005 0.0075 0.0067 2006 0.0076 0.0075 2007 0.0072 0.0052 2008 0.0072 0.0049 2009 0.0071 0.0046 2010 0.0071 0.0046 2011 0.0071 0.0046 2012 0.0071 0.0046 2013 0.0071 0.0046 2014 0.0071 0.0046 2015 0.0068 0.0042 2016 0.0065 0.0038 2017 0.0054 0.0018 2018 0.0052 0.0016 2019 0.0051 0.0015 Notes Back to Intro Back to Summary Gasoline Light-Duty Trucks 1987-93 0.0813 0.1035 (Vans, Pickup Trucks, SUVs)1994 0.0646 0.0982 1995 0.0517 0.0908 1996 0.0452 0.0871 1997 0.0452 0.0871 1998 0.0412 0.0787 1999 0.0333 0.0618 2000 0.0340 0.0631 2001 0.0221 0.0379 2002 0.0242 0.0424 2003 0.0221 0.0373 2004 0.0115 0.0088 2005 0.0105 0.0064 2006 0.0108 0.0080 2007 0.0103 0.0061 2008 0.0095 0.0036 2009 0.0095 0.0036 2010 0.0095 0.0035 2011 0.0096 0.0034 2012 0.0096 0.0033 2013 0.0095 0.0035 2014 0.0095 0.0033 2015 0.0094 0.0031 2016 0.0091 0.0029 2017 0.0084 0.0018 2018 0.0081 0.0015 2019 0.0080 0.0013 Gasoline Heavy-Duty Vehicles 1985-86 0.4090 0.0515 1987 0.3675 0.0849 1988-1989 0.3492 0.0933 1990-1995 0.3246 0.1142 1996 0.1278 0.1680 1997 0.0924 0.1726 1998 0.0655 0.1750 1999 0.0648 0.1724 2000 0.0630 0.1660 2001 0.0577 0.1468 2002 0.0634 0.1673 2003 0.0602 0.1553 2004 0.0298 0.0164 2005 0.0297 0.0083 2006 0.0299 0.0241 2007 0.0322 0.0015 2008 0.0340 0.0015 2009 0.0339 0.0015 2010 0.0320 0.0015 2011 0.0304 0.0015 2012 0.0313 0.0015 2013 0.0313 0.0015 2014 0.0315 0.0015 2015 0.0332 0.0021 2016 0.0321 0.0061 2017 0.0329 0.0084 2018 0.0326 0.0082 2019 0.0330 0.0091 1960-1995 0.0899 0.0087 1996-2019 0.0672 0.0069 Assume these CH4 and N2O factors for ethanol light-duty vehicles Assumed these CH4 and N2O factors for ethanol heavy-duty vehicles and buses Gasoline Motorcycles Vehicle Type Fuel Type Vehicle Year CH4 Factor (g / mile) N2O Factor (g / mile) 1960-1982 0.0006 0.0012 1983-2006 0.0005 0.0010 2007-2019 0.0302 0.0192 1960-1982 0.0011 0.0017 1983-2006 0.0009 0.0014 2007-2019 0.0290 0.0214 1960-2006 0.0051 0.0048 2007-2019 0.0095 0.0431 Methanol 0.0080 0.0050 Ethanol 0.0080 0.0050 CNG 0.0810 0.0050 LPG 0.0080 0.0050 Biodiesel 0.0300 0.0190 Ethanol 0.0120 0.0090 CNG 0.1210 0.0090 LPG 0.0120 0.0120 LNG 0.1210 0.0090 Biodiesel 0.0290 0.0210 CNG 4.2000 0.0010 LPG 0.0140 0.0340 LNG 4.2000 0.0010 Biodiesel 0.0090 0.0430 Methanol 0.0750 0.0280 Ethanol 0.0750 0.0280 CNG 3.7000 0.0010 LPG 0.0130 0.0260 LNG 3.7000 0.0010 Biodiesel 0.0090 0.0430 Methanol 0.0160 0.0320 Ethanol 0.0160 0.0320 CNG 10.0000 0.0010 LPG 0.0340 0.0170 LNG 10.0000 0.0010 Biodiesel 0.0090 0.0430 CH4 and N2O Emissions for Non-Road Vehicles Vehicle Type (superscript from EF Hub removed)Fuel Type CH4 Factor (g / gallon) N2O Factor (g / gallon) Residual Fuel Oil 1.11 0.32 Gasoline (2 stroke)4.58 0.08 Gasoline (4 stroke)2.24 0.01 Diesel 6.41 0.17 Locomotives Diesel 0.80 0.26 Jet Fuel 0 0.30 Aviation Gasoline 7.06 0.11 Gasoline (2 stroke)9.19 0.26 Gasoline (4 stroke)3.33 1.83 Diesel 0.97 0.90 LPG 0.42 0.60 Gasoline 3.33 1.84 Diesel 0.99 0.92 Gasoline (2 stroke)12.11 0.34 Gasoline (4 stroke)3.03 1.67 Diesel 0.94 0.87 LPG 0.44 0.63 Gasoline 3.03 1.67 Diesel 0.99 0.92 Gasoline (2 stroke)10.21 0.28 Gasoline (4 stroke)2.85 1.56 Diesel 0.93 0.86 LPG 0.45 0.64 Gasoline 3.88 2.13 Diesel 0.99 0.91 LPG 0.45 0.64 Gasoline (2 stroke)9.21 0.26 Gasoline (4 stroke)3.04 1.67 Diesel 0.93 0.87 LPG 0.45 0.64 Gasoline (2 stroke)12.48 0.35 Gasoline (4 stroke)2.85 1.57 Diesel 0.99 0.92 Gasoline 2.87 1.59 Diesel 0.83 0.78 LPG 0.43 0.63 Gasoline (2 stroke)4.27 0.20 Gasoline (4 stroke)4.30 2.22 Diesel 0.80 0.75 LPG 0.41 0.58 Diesel Light-Duty Cars Agricultural Offroad Trucks Construction/Mining Equipment Construction/Mining Offroad Trucks Buses Diesel Diesel Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles Agricultural Equipment Passenger Cars Light-Duty Trucks Logging Equipment Railroad Equipment Recreational Equipment Light-Duty Trucks Medium-Duty Trucks Heavy-Duty Trucks Lawn and Garden Equipment Airport Equipment Industrial/Commercial Equipment Ships and Boats Aircraft Refrigerants and Global Warming Potentials (GWPs) Gas GWP CO2 1 CH4 25 N2O 298 HFC-23 14,800 HFC-32 675 HFC-41 92 HFC-125 3,500 HFC-134 1,100 HFC-134a 1,430 HFC-143 353 HFC-143a 4,470 HFC-152 53 HFC-152a 124 HFC-161 12 HFC-227ea 3,220 HFC-236cb 1,340 HFC-236ea 1,370 HFC-236fa 9,810 HFC-245ca 693 HFC-245fa 1,030 HFC-365mfc 794 HFC-43-10mee 1,640 SF6 22,800 NF3 17,200 CF4 7,390 C2F6 12,200 C3F8 8,830 c-C4F8 10,300 C4F10 8,860 C5F12 9,160 C6F14 9,300 C10F18 >7,500 Blended Refrigerants (ASHRAE #) ASHRAE #Blend GWP HFC/PFC R-401A 16 R-401B 14 R-401C 19 R-402A 2,100 R-402B 1,330 R-403B 3,444 R-404A 3,922 R-406A 0 R-407A 2,107 R-407B 2,804 R-407C 1,774 R-407D 1,627 R-407E 1,552 R-408A 2,301 R-409A 0 R-410A 2,088 R-410B 2,229 R-411A 14 R-411B 4 R-413A 2,053 R-414A 0 R-414B 0 R-417A 2,346 R-422A 3,143 R-422D 2,729 R-423A 2,280 R-424A 2,440 R-426A 1,508 R-428A 3,607 R-434A 3,245 R-500 32 R-502 0 R-504 325 R-507 3,985 R-508A 13,214 R-508B 13,396 60% HCFC-22 , 25% HCFC-124 , 15% HCFC-142b 5% HCFC-22 , 39% HCFC-124 , 9.5% HCFC-142b 46% HFC-23 , 54% PFC-116 48.2% HFC-32 , 51.8% CFC-115 5% HFC-125 , 5% HFC143a 39% HFC-23 , 61% PFC-116 44% HFC-125 , 4% HFC-134a , 52% HFC 143a 38% HCFC-22 , 6% HFC-125 , 2% propane 6% HCFC-22 , 38% HFC-125 , 2% propane 56% HCFC-22 , 39% PFC-218 , 5% propane 25% HFC-32 , 15% HFC-125 , 60% HFC-134a 10% HFC-32 , 70% HFC-125 , 20% HFC-134a 23% HFC-32 , 25% HFC-125 , 52% HFC-134a 20% HFC-32 , 40% HFC-125 , 40% HFC-134a 15% HFC-32 , 15% HFC-125 , 70% HFC-134a 53% HCFC-22 , 34% HCFC-124 , 13% HFC-152a 61% HCFC-22 , 28% HCFC-124 , 11% HFC-152a 33% HCFC-22 , 52% HCFC-124 , 15% HFC-152a 50.5% HFC-125, 47% HFC-134a, 2.5% butane/pentane 5.1% HFC-125, 93% HFC-134a, 1.9% butane/pentane 77.5% HFC-125 , 2% HFC-143a , 1.9% isobutane 63.2% HFC-125, 16% HFC-134a, 18% HFC-143a, 2.8% isobutane 48.8% HCFC-22 , 51.2% CFC-115 65.1% HFC-125 , 31.5% HFC-134a , 3.4% isobutane 55% HCFC-22 , 41% HCFC-142b , 4% isobutane 46.6% HFC-125 , 5% HFC-134a , 3.4% butane 85.1% HFC-125 , 11.5% HFC-134a , 3.4% isobutane 94% HCFC-22 , 3% HFC-152a , 3% propylene 47% HCFC-22 , 7% HFC-125 , 46% HFC 143a Blend Make-up 50% HFC-32 , 50% HFC-125 45% HFC-32 , 55% HFC-125 87.5% HCFC-22 , 11 HFC-152a , 1.5% propylene 88% HFC-134a , 9% PFC-218 , 3% isobutane 51% HCFC-22 , 28.5% HCFC-124 , 16.5% HCFC-142b 73.8% CFC-12 , 26.2% HFC-152a , 48.8% HCFC-22 47.5% HFC-227ea , 52.5% HFC-134a , Molecular Weights Element Atomic Weight Carbon 12.011 Electricity Emission Factors (System Average) CO2, CH4 and N2O Total Output Emission Factors by Subregion eGRID2020, February 2022. CO2 Factor CH4 Factor (lb CO2/MWh)(lb CH4/MWh) 1,097.6 0.100 0.014 534.1 0.027 0.005 846.6 0.054 0.007 513.5 0.032 0.004 818.6 0.052 0.007 835.1 0.049 0.006 1,143.2 0.110 0.017 1,653.0 0.178 0.027 1,526.4 0.139 0.020 979.5 0.104 0.015 528.2 0.074 0.010 600.0 0.056 0.008 634.6 0.022 0.003 1,203.9 0.138 0.018 233.5 0.016 0.002 PRMS (Puerto Rico Miscellaneous)1,602.2 0.085 0.014 652.5 0.045 0.006 1,153.1 0.101 0.014 985.0 0.086 0.012 1,144.8 0.101 0.014 954.0 0.100 0.014 931.8 0.060 0.009 740.4 0.032 0.004 1,480.7 0.156 0.023 860.2 0.060 0.009 834.2 0.075 0.011 623.1 0.050 0.007 Business Travel and Employee Commuting Emission Factors Vehicle Type (superscript from EF Hub removed) CO2 Factor (kg / unit) CH4 Factor (g / unit) N2O Factor (g / unit) Units Passenger Car 0.332 0.007 0.007 vehicle-mile Light-Duty Truck 0.454 0.012 0.009 vehicle-mile Motorcycle 0.183 0.070 0.007 vehicle-mile Intercity Rail - Northeast Corridor 0.058 0.0055 0.0007 passenger-mile Intercity Rail - Other Routes 0.150 0.0117 0.0038 passenger-mile Intercity Rail - National Average 0.113 0.0092 0.0026 passenger-mile Commuter Rail 0.139 0.0112 0.0028 passenger-mile Transit Rail (i.e. Subway, Tram)0.099 0.0084 0.0012 passenger-mile Bus 0.056 0.0210 0.0009 passenger-mile Short Haul (< 300 miles)0.207 0.0064 0.0066 passenger-mile Medium Haul (>= 300 miles, < 2300 miles)0.129 0.0006 0.0041 passenger-mile Long Haul (>= 2300 miles)0.163 0.0006 0.0052 passenger-mile Product Transport Emission Factors Vehicle Type (superscript from EF Hub removed) CO2 Factor (kg / unit) CH4 Factor (g / unit) N2O Factor (g / unit) Units Medium- and Heavy-Duty Truck 1.450 0.013 0.034 vehicle-mile Passenger Car 0.332 0.007 0.007 vehicle-mile Light-Duty Truck 0.454 0.012 0.009 vehicle-mile Medium- and Heavy-Duty Truck 0.211 0.0020 0.0049 ton-mile Rail 0.022 0.0017 0.0006 ton-mile Waterborne Craft 0.041 0.0183 0.0008 ton-mile Aircraft 1.165 0.0000 0.0359 ton-mile Fire Suppresant Leak Rates Type of Equipment Leak Rate Fixed 3.5% Portable 2.5% Source: SRMV (SERC Mississippi Valley) SRMW (SERC Midwest) HIOA (HICC Oahu) MROE (MRO East) MROW (MRO West) NEWE (NPCC New England) NWPP (WECC Northwest) NYCW (NPCC NYC/Westchester) NYLI (NPCC Long Island) NYUP (NPCC Upstate NY) RFCE (RFC East) RFCM (RFC Michigan) RFCW (RFC West) RMPA (WECC Rockies) SPNO (SPP North) SPSO (SPP South) AKGD (ASCC Alaska Grid) EPA (2021) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2019. Page A-275. (lb N2O/MWh) Subregion N2O Factor AKMS (ASCC Miscellaneous) AZNM (WECC Southwest) CAMX (WECC California) ERCT (ERCOT All) FRCC (FRCC All) SRSO (SERC South) SRTV (SERC Tennessee Valley) SRVC (SERC Virginia/Carolina) HIMS (HICC Miscellaneous) Waste Emission Factors WARM Material Material for SGEC Lookup (red text indicates different name from WARM) Recycled Landfilled Combusted Composted Anaerobically Digested (Dry Digestate with Curing) Anaerobically Digested (Wet Digestate with Curing) Aluminum Cans Aluminum Cans 0.06 0.02 0.01 NA NA NA Aluminum Ingot Aluminum Ingot 0.04 0.02 0.01 NA NA NA Steel Cans Steel Cans 0.32 0.02 0.01 NA NA NA Copper Wire Copper Wire 0.18 0.02 0.01 NA NA NA Glass Glass 0.05 0.02 0.01 NA NA NA HDPE HDPE 0.21 0.02 2.80 NA NA NA LDPE LDPE NA 0.02 2.80 NA NA NA PET PET 0.23 0.02 2.05 NA NA NA LLDPE LLDPE NA 0.02 2.80 NA NA NA PP PP NA 0.02 2.80 NA NA NA PS PS NA 0.02 3.02 NA NA NA PVC PVC NA 0.02 1.26 NA NA NA PLA PLA NA 0.02 0.01 0.17 NA NA Corrugated Containers Corrugated Containers 0.11 0.90 0.05 NA NA NA Magazines/Third-class mail Magazines and Third class mail 0.02 0.42 0.05 NA NA NA Newspaper Newspaper 0.02 0.35 0.05 NA NA NA Office Paper Office Paper 0.02 1.25 0.05 NA NA NA Phonebooks Phonebooks 0.04 0.35 0.05 NA NA NA Textbooks Textbooks 0.04 1.25 0.05 NA NA NA Dimensional Lumber Dimensional Lumber 0.09 0.17 0.05 NA NA NA Medium-density Fiberboard Medium density Fiberboard 0.15 0.07 0.05 NA NA NA Food Waste (non-meat)Food Waste non meat NA 0.58 0.05 0.15 0.14 0.11 Food Waste (meat only)Food Waste meat only NA 0.58 0.05 NA 0.14 0.11 Beef Beef NA 0.58 0.05 0.15 0.14 0.11 Poultry Poultry NA 0.58 0.05 0.15 0.14 0.11 Grains Grains NA 0.58 0.05 0.15 0.14 0.11 Bread Bread NA 0.58 0.05 0.15 0.14 0.11 Fruits and Vegetables Fruits and Vegetables NA 0.58 0.05 0.15 0.14 0.11 Dairy Products Dairy Products NA 0.58 0.05 0.15 0.14 0.11 Yard Trimmings Yard Trimmings NA 0.33 0.05 0.19 0.11 NA Grass Grass NA 0.26 0.05 0.19 0.09 NA Leaves Leaves NA 0.26 0.05 0.19 0.13 NA Branches Branches NA 0.53 0.05 0.19 0.16 NA Mixed Paper (general)Mixed Paper general 0.07 0.80 0.05 NA NA NA Mixed Paper (primarily residential)Mixed Paper primarily residential 0.07 0.77 0.05 NA NA NA Mixed Paper (primarily from offices)Mixed Paper primarily from offices 0.03 0.75 0.05 NA NA NA Mixed Metals Mixed Metals 0.23 0.02 0.01 NA NA NA Mixed Plastics Mixed Plastics 0.22 0.02 2.34 NA NA NA Mixed Recyclables Mixed Recyclables 0.09 0.68 0.11 NA NA NA Food Waste Food Waste NA 0.58 0.05 0.15 NA NA Mixed Organics Mixed Organics NA 0.48 0.05 0.17 NA NA Mixed MSW Mixed MSW municipal solid waste NA 0.52 0.43 NA NA NA Carpet Carpet NA 0.02 1.68 NA NA NA Desktop CPUs Desktop CPUs NA 0.02 0.40 NA NA NA Portable Electronic Devices Portable Electronic Devices NA 0.02 0.89 NA NA NA Flat-panel Displays Flat panel Displays NA 0.02 0.74 NA NA NA CRT Displays CRT Displays NA 0.02 0.64 NA NA NA Electronic Peripherals Electronic Peripherals NA 0.02 2.23 NA NA NA Hard-copy Devices Hard copy Devices NA 0.02 1.92 NA NA NA Mixed Electronics Mixed Electronics NA 0.02 0.87 NA NA NA Clay Bricks Clay Bricks NA 0.02 NA NA NA NA Concrete Concrete 0.01 0.02 NA NA NA NA Fly Ash Fly Ash 0.01 0.02 NA NA NA NA Tires Tires 0.10 0.02 2.21 NA NA NA Asphalt Concrete Asphalt Concrete - 0.02 NA NA NA NA Asphalt Shingles Asphalt Shingles 0.03 0.02 0.70 NA NA NA Drywall Drywall NA 0.02 NA NA NA NA Fiberglass Insulation Fiberglass Insulation 0.05 0.02 NA NA NA NA Vinyl Flooring Vinyl Flooring NA 0.02 0.29 NA NA NA Wood Flooring Wood Flooring NA 0.18 0.08 NA NA NA Metric Tons CO2e / Short Ton Material Notes: These factors do not include any avoided emissions impact from any of the disposal methods. All the factors presented here include transportation emissions, which are optional in the Scope 3 Calculation Guidance, with an assumed average distance traveled to the processing facility. AR4 GWPs are used to convert all waste emission factors into CO2e. Recycling emissions include transport to recycling facility and sorting of recycled materials at material recovery facility. Landfilling emissions include transport to landfill, equipment use at landfill and fugitive landfill CH4 emissions. Landfill CH4 is based on typical landfill gas collection practices and average landfill moisture conditions. Combustion emissions include transport to combustion facility and combustion-related non-biogenic CO2 and N2O Composting emissions include transport to composting facility, equipment use at composting facility and CH4 and N2O emissions during composting. Scope 3 Emissions from Waste - HELP SHEET DEFINITION COLLECT Data Collection Checklist - QUANTIFY Scope 3 emissions from waste include the disposal and treatment of waste generated in the reporting company’s operations in the reporting year in facilities not owned or controlled by the reporting company. These emission factors align with the requirements of the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard. The emission factors do not include any avoided emissions impact from any of the disposal methods. All the factors presented include transportation emissions, which are optional in the Scope 3 Calculation Guidance, with an assumed average distance traveled to the processing facility. AR4 GWPs are used to convert all waste emission factors into CO2e. Collect information on the amount of weight disposed at your facilities, by the type of waste (plastics, paper, etc.) and disposal method (recycling, incineration, etc.). Refer to the Emission Factors tab for a complete list of materials and available disposal methods. Weight of waste disposed by material type and disposal method Enter the data into the appropriate orange colored boxes (Tables 1) of the Calculator section titled “Waste.” Once the data are entered into the Calculator, the CO2 equivalent emissions are calculated and summarized in the green colored box. Back to Intro Back to Data Entry Emission Factors EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Direct 1.0)1 of 1 Hope Community Church Development Infrastructure Feasibility Study May 2023 Prepared for: City of Corcoran, MN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. One Carlson Parkway Plymouth, MN 55447 Project Number: 193806190_112 HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN May 2023 Project Number: 193806190-112 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1.1 2.0 TRANSPORTATION........................................................................................................2.1 2.1 BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................2.1 2.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS......................................................2.1 2.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................2.1 2.4 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ...................................................................................................2.2 2.5 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................2.4 2.6 FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................2.7 3.0 SEWER AND WATER .....................................................................................................3.8 3.1 SEWER ............................................................................................................................3.8 3.2 WATER ............................................................................................................................3.8 3.2.1 Demands ........................................................................................................3.9 3.2.2 Scenario Descriptions ....................................................................................3.9 3.2.3 Scenario 1 - Tower On, Maple Grove Off .....................................................3.10 3.2.4 Scenario 2 - Maple Grove On, Tower Off .....................................................3.10 3.3 FINDINGS ......................................................................................................................3.11 4.0 WATER RESOURCES ..................................................................................................4.12 4.1 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ..........................................................................................4.12 4.2 WATERSHED SETTING AND LAND USE ....................................................................4.12 4.3 WETLANDS ...................................................................................................................4.13 4.4 ROADWAY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS...................................................................4.13 4.5 FINDINGS ......................................................................................................................4.13 5.0 FINANCING .....................................................................................................................5.1 5.1 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................5.1 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................................6.1 TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................................................6.1 SEWER ........................................................................................................................................6.1 WATER ........................................................................................................................................6.2 WATER RESOURCES ................................................................................................................6.2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project ............................................................2.2 Table 2: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes....................................................................2.3 Table 3: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes....................................................................2.4 Table 4: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results ......................................................2.5 Table 5: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results ......................................................2.6 HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN May 2023 Project Number: 193806190-112 FIGURES Figure 1 Site Plan APPENDICES Appendix A Sewer Comprehensive Plan System Appendix B NE Water System Appendix C Stormwater Modeling Guidelines and Floodplain HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Introduction May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 1.0 Introduction Hope Community Church Development representatives have been planning for developing this parcel for over 20 years and has submitted a concept to develop a multi-purpose campus that maintains the church operations and expands the site to include housing for seniors along with more diverse uses such as commercial and medical. The concept shows that full development provides 738 varied housing units and up to 110,300 square feet of commercial, retail, and medical office space. This study reviews the City infrastructure components involved in development that consists of transportation, sewer, water and stormwater. Although the City is the lead for the local government process, there are multiple agencies involved with reviewing and issuing permits or approvals for the development including Hennepin County (CR 116 and CR30 access and septic abandonment), Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA—Construction Stormwater and sewer system), Minnesota Department of Health (MDH--watermain), Elm Creek Water Management Commission (stormwater), and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES—trunk sewer compliance). This site has a significant ongoing infrastructure component for water supply, in that the project is scheduled to use the City’s Water Treatment Plant and Tower unless a temporary contract amendment with Corcoran and Maple Grove is executed. . HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 2.0 Transportation 2.1 Background This study examined weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: CSAH 30/CR 116 CR 116/Oswald Farm Road CSAH 30/access (future) 2.2 Proposed Development Characteristics For purpose of the traffic impact analysis, the proposed development is assumed to consist of the following uses: Rowhomes – 54 dwelling units Villas – 20 dwelling units Senior housing – 324 dwelling units Apartments – 340 dwelling units Medical office – 72,160 square feet General office – 18,040 square feet Coffee shop – 4,000 square feet Fast casual restaurant – 4,000 square feet Retail – 12,100 square feet Access will be provided on the north by reconfiguring the connection of Oswald Farm Road and Hunters Ridge and on the south via a new connection to CSAH 30. 2.3 Existing Conditions The proposed project site is currently partially utilized by Hope Community Church, which will remain at its current location. The site is bounded by CSAH 30 on the south, agricultural land on the west, existing residential uses on the north, and CR 116 on the east. Near the site location, CSAH 30 and CR 116 are two lane undivided roadways with turn lanes and traffic signal control at major intersections. Oswald Farm Road is a local two-lane roadway. Existing conditions near the proposed project location are described below. CSAH 30/CR 116 - This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound, northbound, and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane with a channelized right turn island. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 CR 116/Oswald Farm - This four-way intersection is controlled on two legs with stop signs on the eastbound and westbound approaches. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn/through lane and one through/right turn lane. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane, with turn lanes under design as part of the Bellwether development. Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at the existing intersections in February, 2023. Existing traffic volume data is presented later in this report. 2.4 Traffic Forecasts To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the years 2028 and 2040. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: 2023 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. 2028 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.6 percent per year to determine 2028 No-Build volumes. The 1.6 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on historic traffic volume growth in the project area and traffic forecast information presented in the Corcoran Comprehensive Plan. 2028 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2028 No-Build volumes to determine 2028 Build volumes. 2040 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.6 percent per year to determine 2040 No-Build volumes. The 1.6 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on historic traffic volume growth in the project area and traffic forecast information presented in the Corcoran Comprehensive Plan. 2040 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2040 No-Build volumes to determine 2040 Build volumes. The expected new development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The gross trip generation totals were reduced by 10 percent to account for internal trips. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 1. Table 1: Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use (ITE Code)Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Rowhomes (215)54 DU 6 20 26 18 13 31 389 Villas (210)20 DU 4 10 14 12 7 19 189 Senior Housing (252)324 DU 22 43 65 46 35 81 1050 Apartments (221)340 DU 29 97 126 81 52 133 1543 HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 Medical Office (720)72,160 SF 177 47 224 85 199 284 2598 General Office (710)18,040 SF 25 2 27 4 22 26 196 Coffee Shop (937)4,000 SF 176 168 344 78 78 156 2134 Fast Casual Restaurant (930) 4,000 SF 2 4 6 28 22 50 388 Retail (822)12,100 SF 17 11 28 40 40 80 659 Totals 458 402 860 392 468 860 9146 10% reduction for internal trips (46)(40)(86)(39)(47)(86)(915) Net Totals 412 362 774 353 421 774 8231 Notes:SF=square feet and DU=dwelling units The coffee shop, restaurant, and retail trips can be categorized in the following trip types: New Trips. Trips solely to and from the proposed development. Pass-By Trips. Trips that are attracted from the traffic volume on roadways immediately adjacent to the site. Based on information published in the Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the percentage of each trip type is as follows: 60% new, 40% pass by Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are described below: 15 percent to/from the north on CR 116 70 percent to/from the east on CSAH 30 5 percent to/from the west on CSAH 30 10 percent to/from the south on CR 116 Development trips from Table 1 were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant peak hour volumes are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CR 116/ Hunters/ Oswald EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2023 Existing 8 0 14 1 0 0 13 80 0 1 389 13 2028 No-Build 9 0 15 1 0 0 14 87 0 1 421 14 2028 Build 60 0 180 1 0 0 170 80 0 1 400 87 2040 No-Build 10 0 18 1 0 0 17 105 0 1 509 17 2040 Build 61 0 183 1 0 0 173 98 0 1 488 90 CSAH 30/CR 116 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 2023 Existing 6 499 37 88 120 27 7 60 58 87 302 9 2028 No-Build 6 540 40 95 130 29 8 65 63 94 327 10 2028 Build 6 618 47 95 231 160 23 83 63 220 345 10 2040 No-Build 8 654 48 115 157 35 9 79 76 114 396 12 2040 Build 8 732 59 115 266 166 25 97 76 240 414 12 CSAH 30/access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2023 Existing -542 --136 ------- 2028 No-Build -587 --147 ------- 2028 Build 48 555 --137 135 ---121 -25 2040 No-Build -710 --178 ------- 2040 Build 48 678 --168 135 ---121 -25 Table 3: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CR 116/ Hunters/ Oswald EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2023 Existing 13 0 15 3 0 0 17 365 2 0 135 10 2028 No-Build 14 0 16 3 0 0 18 395 2 0 146 11 2028 Build 85 0 190 3 0 0 175 379 2 0 141 60 2040 No-Build 17 0 20 4 0 0 22 478 3 0 177 13 2040 Build 88 0 194 4 0 0 179 462 3 0 172 62 CSAH 30/CR 116 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2023 Existing 11 283 13 56 488 78 34 295 131 51 83 17 2028 No-Build 12 306 14 61 528 84 37 319 142 55 90 18 2028 Build 12 417 28 61 584 215 45 338 142 203 111 18 2040 No-Build 14 371 17 73 639 102 45 386 172 67 109 22 2040 Build 14 482 33 73 718 233 56 405 172 215 130 22 CSAH 30/access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 2023 Existing -307 --539 ------- 2028 No-Build -332 --584 ------- 2028 Build 27 321 --563 111 ---138 -39 2040 No-Build -402 --706 ------- 2040 Build 2 391 --685 111 ---138 -39 2.5 Traffic Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. The existing northbound and southbound by-pass lanes on CR 116 at Hunters Ridge/Oswald will be replaced with left and right turn lanes with the 2023 turn lane improvements. The modified geometrics were used for all future analysis scenarios. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. The LOS results for the study intersections are presented in Tables 4 and 5. Table 4: Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results CR 116/Hunters /Oswald EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing B B B B B B A A A A A A A 2028 No-Build B B B B B B A A A A A A A 2028 Build D D D C C C A A A A A A A 2040 No-Build B B B B B B A A A A A A A 2040 Build E E E D D D A A A A A A B CSAH 30/ CR 116 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing B B B B A A B B C B C B B 2028 No-Build B B B B B A C C C B C B B 2028 Build B C B B B A C C C C C C C 2040 No-Build B C B B B A C C C C C C C 2040 Build B C B C B A C D D C D C C HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 CSAH 30/ access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing -A --A -------A 2028 No-Build -A --A -------A 2028 Build A A --A A ---C -A A 2040 No-Build -A --A -------A 2040 Build A A --A ----D -A A Table 5: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results CR 116/Hunters /Oswald EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing B B B B B B A A A A A A A 2028 No-Build B B B B B B A A A A A A A 2028 Build C C C D D D A A A A A A A 2040 No-Build B B B C C C A A A A A A A 2040 Build E E E D D D A A A A A A B CSAH 30/ CR 116 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing B B B B B A B C B B B B B 2028 No-Build B B B B B A B C B B B B B 2028 Build B C B B C A C C C C B B C 2040 No-Build B B B B C A B C C C C C C 2040 Build C C B B D A C E D D C C D CSAH 30/ access EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection 2023 Existing -A --A -------A 2028 No-Build -A --A -------A 2028 Build A A --A A ---E -A A 2040 No-Build -A --A -------A 2040 Build A A --A ----F -A A Under existing, 2028 No-Build, 2028 Build, and 2040 No-Build conditions, all movements and intersections operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Under 2040 Build conditions, the southbound left turn at the CSAH 30/access intersection operates at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. The overall intersection operates at LOS A during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. All other movements and intersections operate at LOS E or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Vehicle queues for exiting movements at the site access points under 2040 Build conditions were reviewed to determine the recommended turn lane lengths. The 95th percentile maximum queue for eastbound movements at the CR 116/Oswald intersection was 81 feet during the a.m. peak hour and 73 feet during the p.m. peak hour. At the CSAH 30/access intersection, the 95th percentile maximum queue for southbound movements was 80 feet during the a.m. peak hour and 107 feet during the p.m. peak hour. Under existing conditions at the CSAH 30/CR 116 intersection, the westbound right turn movement is accommodated with a channelized island but no dedicated right turn lane. As traffic volumes increase due to background growth and development traffic, the lack of a dedicated right turn lane impacts overall HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Transportation May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 intersection operations. In order to adequately accommodate traffic volumes, a dedicated westbound right turn lane is recommended at this intersection. 2.6 Findings The following mitigation measures are recommended at each intersection: CSAH 30/CR 116 o Construct dedicated westbound right lane 300 feet in length. CR 116/Hunters Ridge/Oswald Farm o Previously programmed northbound and southbound left and right turn lane improvements will provide access at intersection. o Widen eastbound Oswald Farm and widen westbound Hunters Ridge to provide a 200 foot left turn lane and through / right lane. New CSAH 30 access o Construct a 300-foot eastbound left turn and westbound right turn lanes on CSAH 30. Construct southbound approach with 200-foot left turn and right turn lanes. County will review their system as part of the EAW process and ensure the County system is adequate to handle increased volumes and patterns. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Sewer and Water May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 3.0 Sewer and Water The development is located near the west boundary of the 2040 MUSA, and trunk utilities will need to be extended to and through the site. 3.1 Sewer The development can be serviced by extending the trunk main from its planned location at the west boundary of Water Treatment Plant site. Currently the trunk terminates in the Bellwether development and a City project will install the 30-inch line to the east ROW of CR 116. The development will be responsible for extending the sewer trunk from the City’s Water Treatment parcel and continue through the site at elevations consistent with the Trunk Sewer Comprehensive Plan. The alignment is shown within development’s street and CR 116 ROWs and alignment and ROW/easement widths will be reviewed with the development construction plan process. Currently the 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows the trunk alignment crosses beneath Hunters Ridge Road just northwest of its junction with Oswald Farm Road (Appendix A) and follows the low area/wetland north of Hope Community Church to the west property boundary. The trunk sewer invert is planned for elevation 905.2 (Node NE 5 at Water Treatment Plant) resulting in a 42-foot cut through the road corridor based on existing topography. Other factors to be coordinated include the development’s construction phasing, the water tower construction activities, and Hope Church operations. Sewer stubs/laterals will be extended for adjacent properties consistent with City policy. Preliminary finding would be a stub for future installation to service the existing development of Hunters Ridge Road and a stub towards CR 116 for Node NE 6 shown in Appendix A . Offsite work is typically designed and managed by the City under an escrow process. Agency permitting will be extensive and involve MCES, WCA, County, and MPCA. 3.2 Water Corcoran has authorized contracts for construction of a water treatment plant (WTP) and an elevated storage tank (tower) in the NE Zone with planned operation at the end of 2024. This development is contingent upon an operational system unless a modification of the Corcoran/Maple Grove water supply contract is executed. A 2021 feasibility study for raw water wells and pipes is also included in Appendix B. For the purposes of this report, the main analysis was executed assuming the WTP and tower are operational, with the tower providing the hydraulic grade line (WTP pumps off). An additional worst-case scenario was evaluated in which both the Tower and WTP are offline, with the existing 16-inch interconnect with Maple Grove providing the hydraulic grade line. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Sewer and Water May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 3.2.1 Demands The demands for the development were estimated using data from the developer-provided site plan. The site plan included numbers of residential units and commercial uses with proposed square footages. Average demands for residential uses were calculated based on the number of units and relative residential densities in accordance with previous Corcoran water studies. Demand estimates for commercial/institutional uses were based on occupied square footage and type of use. The calculated demand for each building shown on the concept site plan was assigned a model node. The table below presents the average and maximum day demands calculated for each building and assigned to each node within the Hope Community Church Development. A factor of 3.0 was used to calculate maximum day demands from average day demands. Peak hour demands (not shown in the table) were calculated using a factor of 2.0 multiplied by maximum day demands. Avg Day Flow Avg Day Demand Max Day DemandBuildingBuilding Type gal/day Node gal/day gal/day A Multi-Fam Housing 28,800 B Retail 1,600 C Medical 7,000 J-264 37,400 112,200 D Medical 5,800 E Retail 1,600 K Church 6,000 J-265 13,400 40,200 F Multi-Fam Housing 35,100 G Senior Housing 46,800 J-263 81,900 245,700 H 55+ Housing 27,300 I Villas 4,500 J-261 31,800 95,400 J Row Homes 12,400 J-262 12,400 37,200 The total NE Zone system demands used for each scenario are shown below. Average Day – 0.32 MGD Maximum Day – 0.95 MGD Peak Hour – 1,321 gal/min 3.2.2 Scenario Descriptions A map of the NE Zone pipe network that was used for this modeling work is shown on Figure 1 of Appendix B. The Hope Community Church Development area watermains are proposed to include 20-inch trunk main and 8-inch water mains. Scenario 1 evaluated predicted pressures and available fire flows within the NE Zone with the tower providing the hydraulic grade and the WTP pumps and connection to Maple Grove turned off. The assumed water levels in the tower were 5 ft below overflow for average day and 10 ft below overflow for maximum day and peak hour demand conditions. Scenario 2 evaluated predicted pressures and available fire flow within the NE Zone with the 16-inch Maple Grove connection providing the hydraulic grade and the tower and WTP off. The assumed hydraulic grade at the Maple Grove interconnect was 1,093 ft for all demand conditions. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Sewer and Water May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 For fire flow analyses, the industry standard minimum residual pressure of 20 psi was used. For residential areas, a target fire flow of 1,500 gpm is assumed. For commercial/industrial areas, a higher target fire flow of 3,000 gpm is typical. New commercial/industrial buildings may be sprinklered and, as such, most of these buildings will ultimately have a lower acceptable target. However, 3,000 gpm is deemed a reasonable overall target, and allows for some conservatism in this safety-driven parameter. These targets are only estimates for planning purposes and do not represent a rating for the site. 3.2.3 Scenario 1 - Tower On, Maple Grove Off The results for this scenario for the nodes within the proposed Hope Community Church Development are shown in the table below. The full results for all nodes in the NE Zone with Tower On are shown in Appendix B Table 1. Additionally, the average day pressure results and maximum day available fire flow results for this scenario are mapped in Figures 2 and 3 of Appendix B, respectively. Node Elevation (ft) Average Day Demand (gpm) Average Day Pressure (psi) Max Day Fire Flow (Available) (gpm) J-261 946 22.1 68.8 2,562 J-262 952 8.6 66.2 3,255 J-263 950.3 56.8 66.9 >5,000 J-264 952 25.8 66.2 >5,000 J-265 952.2 9.2 66.1 >5,000 As shown above, average day pressures are within the 60-70 psi range. Modeling also indicates that during the peak hour (of maximum day, a condition of rare occurrence), pressure in the development area fall by approximately 7-8 psi. This means the lowest expected pressure within the development is approximately 58.8 psi, which is above the recommended minimum of 35 psi. The maximum available fire flows along the 20-inch trunk main are over 5,000 gpm. However, J-261, which would supply multistory senior housing and residential villas, is modeled at approximately 2,600 gpm available fire flow, above the 1,500 gpm target. 3.2.4 Scenario 2 - Maple Grove On, Tower Off The results for this scenario for the nodes within the proposed Hope Community Church Development are shown in the table below. The full results for all nodes in the NE Zone with Maple Grove connection on are shown in Appendix B Table 2. Additionally, the average day pressure results and maximum day available fire flow results for this scenario are mapped in Figures 4 and 5 of Appendix B, respectively. Node Elevation (ft) Average Day Demand (gpm) Average Day Pressure (psi) Max Day Fire Flow (Available) (gpm) J-261 946 22.1 63.3 1,582 J-262 952 8.6 60.7 1,732 J-263 950.3 56.8 61.5 2,258 J-264 952 25.8 60.7 2,233 J-265 952.2 9.2 60.6 2,243 HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Sewer and Water May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 As shown above, average day pressures are within the 60-65 psi range. Modeling also indicates that during the peak hour (of maximum day, a condition of rare occurrence), pressures in the development area fall by approximately 7-8 psi. This means the lowest expected pressure within the development is approximately 53 psi, which is above the recommended minimum of 35 psi. Under this scenario, all of the fire flows within the Hope Community Church Development nodes are below the 3,000-gpm target for commercial uses but exceed the 1,500-gpm target for residential areas. 3.3 Findings The following mitigation measures are required for sewer and water: Sewer Sewer trunk will need to be extended from the City’s Water Treatment Plant site and installed at inverts consistent with the City’s 2040 Sewer Comprehensive Plan and shall be responsibility of Developer. Onsite alignment is currently within development roads, and these will be finalized during Construction Plan approval process. ROW and easement needs are based on pipe depth, for example ROW is a minimum of 60 feet for any internal streets with trunk sewer at 30 feet, and combination of ROW and larger easement will be coordinated with City for sewer depths greater than 30 feet. A lateral will be extended to north property border within Hunter’s Ridge Road for future connection of the existing development. Stub will be installed to east boundary of property along CR 116 for future service for Node NE 6 as shown in City NE Sewer Comprehensive Plan. Water This development is contingent upon an operational NE Corcoran treatment plant and tower, unless an amendment to the existing Maple Grove water agreement is obtained. Both the Tower and Maple Grove connection can provide average day pressure within an range of 60-70 psi at ground elevation. Supply from Maple Grove will result in slightly less pressure. Construction of the water tower shows that target fire flows of 3,000 gpm can be provided to the Hope Community Development Area. Extend a 20-inch trunk water main to the tower from the treatment plant and also south from the tower to the CR-30 ROW. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Water Resources May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 Loop the west property boundary with 8-inch lateral from Oswald Farm Way to Hope Road for redundancy and water quality, depending on timing and phasing of development. A dedicated lot for a future municipal well should be shown to provide a well site consistent with City water supply needs. Provide 20 foot easement and install the raw water line along CR 116 for municipal water supply. Provide 20 foot easement along CR30 for future raw water supply from the west. 4.0 Water Resources 4.1 Regulatory Overview Stormwater management regulations in the proposed project area would be guided or directed by Corcoran’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (Local Plan) the City’s Guidelines, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and MS4 requirements. Each of these documents has a larger regulatory context: The Local Plan reflects the goals, policies and rules of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission’s Third Generation Watershed Management Plan (Commission’s WMP). The SWPPP is a requirement of the City’s stormwater permit, also known as the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. The MS4 permit is issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) which was reissued in October of 2021. Among other goals, both documents include plans to meet pollutant load reductions calculated in the Elm Creek Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study. TMDL studies are required for surface waters that are designated as impaired – in other words, those that do not meet one or more State water quality standards. City guidelines lay out the required modeling parameters, preferred BMPs and some construction materials. City approval is required prior to application for the WMO approval process. Further City review occurs with construction plan approval process. 4.2 Watershed Setting and Land Use Stormwater is manageable for the site and will be subject to City stormwater guidelines, wetland regulations and Elm Creek Watershed approval. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Water Resources May 2023 Project Number: 193806190_112 Stormwater management for the concept plan is shown on the perimeter of the site with basins on the northwest, west, southeast and southwest. This site has high percentage of impervious and rate control will be accomplished in ponds and filtration basins. o Perimeter discharge locations will be reviewed for downstream conveyance capacity. The watershed reviews the abstraction and water quality components, along with rate control. No FEMA floodplain exists on site (see Figure C-1 in Appendix C) and for reference the nearest floodplain to the west is identified at a 915 elevation as compared to the onsite low area (wetland) at a 940 contour and the northeast low corner is a 935 elevation. The urban/rural fringe is challenging for drainage and the City reviews potential offsite drainage impacts for the additional volume associated with increased urbanization (impervious roads and rooftops). The City has required prior developments to study these impacts and also, when necessary, make offsite improvements. This same approach will be applied during the Hope Community approval process when stormwater management and grading plans are available. 4.3 Wetlands Significant wetlands exist and the formal process will need to be followed and the EAW has a wetland review component. Corcoran is the LGU for the WCA process. 4.4 Roadway Drainage Improvements Development should provide treatment for required road improvements when feasible. 4.5 Findings Stormwater is manageable for the site, although modifications will occur during the City and approval process. City stormwater guidelines will be utilized (see Appendix C) that cover modeling and drainage items. These guidelines will be updated with the 2023 Engineering Standards update prior to final plat approval. A City stormwater area charge may be in place prior to final plat. Modeling and grading plan will be reviewed with the preliminary plat process and strategies for mitigation of offsite volume or conveyance impacts will be determined. Hope Development will be required to provide on site stormwater management for offsite road improvements, where feasible. Draintile information shall be provided with existing conditions analysis of the site. HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CORCORAN Financing May 2023 Project Number: 193806190-112 5.0 Financing 5.1 Summary Financing options of the development necessary for infrastructure and to mitigate impacts typically follow the approach of: On-site infrastructure is managed by the developer. Stormwater fee may be implemented by City prior to final plat. All trunk fees (TLAC) and potential stormwater area charge will be due at the time of final plat. Off-site projects are typically managed by the by City (engineering, bidding and construction management) through an escrow. The details of area fees, credits, and infrastructure financial commitments will be identified in the Developer Agreement, which is updated with each phase of the development 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The following infrastructure improvements are feasible and necessary to manage the development. These improvements are consistent with similar requirements for other developments in Corcoran, and have shown to be necessary for managing the additional population: Transportation CSAH 30/CR 116 o Construct dedicated westbound right lane 300 feet in length. CR 116/Hunters Ridge/Oswald Farm o Previously programmed northbound and southbound left and right turn lane improvements will provide access at intersection. o Widen eastbound Oswald Farm and widen westbound Hunters Ridge to provide a 200 foot left turn lane and through / right lane. New CSAH 30 access o Construct a 300-foot eastbound left turn and westbound right turn lanes on CSAH 30. Construct southbound approach with 200-foot left turn and right turn lanes. County will review their system as a responsibility of permitting the improvements and review during the EAW process to ensure the County system is adequate to handle increased volumes and patterns. Sewer Sewer trunk will need to be extended from the City’s Water Treatment Plant site and installed at inverts consistent with the City’s 2040 Sewer Comprehensive Plan and shall be responsibility of Developer. Onsite alignment is currently within development roads, and these will be finalized during Construction Plan approval process. ROW and easement needs are based on pipe depth, for example ROW is a minimum of 60 feet for any internal streets with trunk sewer at 30 feet, and combination of ROW and larger easement will be coordinated with City for sewer depths greater than 30 feet. A lateral will be extended to north property border within Hunter’s Ridge Road for future connection of the existing development. Stub will be installed to east boundary of property along CR 116 for future service for Node NE 6 as shown in City NE Sewer Comprehensive Plan. Water This development is contingent upon an operational NE Corcoran treatment plant and tower, unless an amendment to the existing Maple Grove water agreement is obtained. Both the Tower and Maple Grove connection can provide average day pressure in Hope Community Church’s proposed 20-inch and 8-inch water main within an ideal range of 60-70 psi. Supply from Maple Grove will result in slightly less pressure. Construction of the water tower shows that target fire flows of 3,000 gpm can be provided to the Hope Community Church Development Area. Extend a 20-inch trunk water main to the tower from the treatment plant and also south from the tower to the CR-30 Right of Way. Loop the west property boundary with 8-inch lateral from Oswald Farm Way to Hope Road for redundancy and water quality, depending on timing and phasing of development. A dedicated lot for a future municipal well should be shown to provide a well site consistent with City water supply needs. Provide 20-foot easement and install the raw water line along CR 116 for municipal water supply. Provide 20-foot easement along CR30 for future raw water supply from the west. Water Resources City stormwater guidelines will be utilized (see Appendix C) that cover modeling and drainage items. These guidelines will be updated with the 2023 Engineering Standards update prior to final plat approval. A City stormwater area charge may be in place prior to final plat. Modeling and grading plan will be reviewed with the preliminary plat process and strategies for mitigation of offsite volume or conveyance impacts will be determined. Hope Development will be required to provide on-site stormwater management for offsite road improvements, where feasible. Draintile information shall be provided with existing conditions analysis of the site. FIGURE Site Plan SENIOR HOUSING "G" 56,000 S.F. 55+ HOUSING "H" 33,100 S.F. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F. PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 43,200 S.F. (3 STORIES) PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 47,000 S.F. (3 STORIES) PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "A" 43,000 S.F. PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 4 STORIES OVER 1 EXISTING POND POND AMENITY POND EXISTING CEMETERY POND 4 UNITS8 UNITS4 UNITS54 UNITS 4.33 ACRES12345678910111213141516171819202.52 ACRES 4.33 ACRES 4.48 ACRES 5.41 ACRES 3.95 ACRESO S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROAD120 UNITS 4 STORIES OVER 1 204 UNITS 184 UNITS PONDFILTRATIONPOND POND FILTRATION FILTRATION 156 UNITS POND FILTRATION POND FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FILTRATION FILTRATION PARK / PLAYGROUND 1.2 ACRES COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAY8 UNITS 8 UNITS6 UNITS 8 UNITS8 UNITS 1361953.77FND IP 249921362948.92FND IP 249921358953.22FND IP 1/2" OPEN1343951.08FND IP 1/2" OPEN TIPPEDFND IP 1/2"OPEN TIPPEDFND IP 1/2" OPENFND IPCAPPED 24992FND IPCAPPED 24992WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022FULL ACCESS INTERSECTION DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC 50.0' 50.0'50.0'50.0'REGIONAL TRAIL 120.0' ROW 10.0' PROPOSED ROW 100.0' EXISTING ROW SCALE IN FEET 0 16080 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | SCOTT FROST | 11/23/2022 1:14:21 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C3-SITE.DWG:C3.02 SITE PLAN CONCEPT W AERIALHOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN SITE PLAN CONCEPT W AERIAL C3.02 #### # APPENDIX A Sewer Comprehensive Plan System !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H City of Maple GroveCity of Rogers DuffneyDrCounty Road 10 Hillside Dr Hunt ers R d g County Road 116Schutte Farm R d H id d e n PondsDr C herry LnRobertLnC ount y Road 30 J a c k ie L n Cain RdSchutte LnEbert RdCountry Rd Pat ric k PlLilyPondLnDarrellLnOswaldFarmRdOakdaleDr Dassel Ln Stie g R d ShannonLnS c hu t t e Rd Rush Meadow Ln My st ique Dr 93rd Ave N S u n n y Hill LnBrandywine RdRush Creek SouthForkRushCreek S o u th ForkRush C reekNE-M NE-S NE-C NE-A NE-B NE-D NE-G NE-H NE-L NE-E NE-JNE-I NE-F NE-N NE-T NE-K NE-R NE-V NE-U NE-O NE-Q NE-W NE-P SE-AP SE-AQ SE-AF 15''30''8''8''30''30''15''30''30''10' '8''10''10''12''15''30''30''12''15''6''30''30''30''NE-1 NE-2 NE-3 NE-4 NE-5 NE-6 NE-7 NE-8 NE-9 NE-10 NE-11 NE-12 NE-13 (LS) NE-14 NE-15 NE-16 NE-17 NE-18 Elm Creek Interceptor NE-19 NE-20 NE-21 NE-22 NE-23 456710 456730 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,500 0 1,500750 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\NE Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer_LS.mxd Date: 1/8/2019 Time: 7:15:58 AM User: ShuJC0243!Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Proposed Forcemain !H Sewer Nodes (LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-2Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - NE District 115 SENIOR HOUSING "G" 56,000 S.F. 55+ HOUSING "H" 33,100 S.F. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "F" 51,000 S.F. PROPOSED MEDICAL "D" 43,200 S.F. (3 STORIES) PROPOSED MEDICAL "C" 47,000 S.F. (3 STORIES) PROPOSED RETAIL "B" 10,100 S.F. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING "A" 43,000 S.F. PROPOSED ROWHOMES "J" PROPOSED VILLAS "I" WATER TOWER 4 STORIES OVER 1 4 STORIES OVER 1 20 UNITS 4 STORIES OVER 1 EXISTING POND POND AMENITY POND EXISTING CEMETERY POND 4 UNITS8 UNITS4 UNITS54 UNITS 4.33 ACRES12345678910111213141516171819202.52 ACRES 4.33 ACRES 4.48 ACRES 5.41 ACRES 3.95 ACRESO S W A L D F A R M R O A D HOPE WAYOSWALD FARM ROAD HUNTERS RIDGEHUNTERS RIDGEOSWALD FARM ROAD120 UNITS 4 STORIES OVER 1 204 UNITS 184 UNITS PONDFILTRATIONPOND POND FILTRATION FILTRATION 156 UNITS POND FILTRATION POND FUTURE CEMETERY PROPOSED RETAIL "E" 10,000 S.F. FILTRATION FILTRATION PARK / PLAYGROUND 1.2 ACRES COUNTY ROAD #30COUNTY ROAD #116 HOPE WAY8 UNITS 8 UNITS6 UNITS 8 UNITS8 UNITS 1361953.77FND IP 249921362948.92FND IP 249921358953.22FND IP 1/2" OPEN1343951.08FND IP 1/2" OPEN TIPPEDFND IP 1/2"OPEN TIPPEDFND IP 1/2" OPENFND IPCAPPED 24992FND IPCAPPED 24992WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/27/2022AND DELINEATED BY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022WETLAND LOCATED BY SAMBATEKON 09/27/2022 AND DELINEATEDBY SAMBATEK ON 09/15/2022FULL ACCESS INTERSECTION DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC 50.0' 50.0'50.0'50.0'REGIONAL TRAIL 120.0' ROW 10.0' PROPOSED ROW 100.0' EXISTING ROW SCALE IN FEET 0 16080 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | SCOTT FROST | 11/23/2022 1:14:21 PML:\PROJECTS\51372\CAD\SHEETS\51372-C3-SITE.DWG:C3.02 SITE PLAN CONCEPT W AERIALHOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN SITE PLAN CONCEPT W AERIAL C3.02 #### # Trunk Inverts from Comprehensive Plan 159 APPENDIX B NE Water System !O !O !O #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake 456710 R u s h C reekRushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek SouthForkR u sh C r eek2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Trunk Water System.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:36:40 PM User: ShuJC0243 Existing WatermainProposed Watermain !O Potential Water Tower Locations #*Existing Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #*Proposed Supply Connection withNeighboring Communities #* Emergency Connection withNeighboring Communities(Normally Closed) #*Potential Water Storage #*Potential Booster StationPotential Future Well Exploration AreasMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 9-2Trunk Water System 137 Water Modeling Results Table 1 Water Model Results Scenario 1 - Tower On, Maple Grove Off Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi)Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi)Fire Flow (Available) (gpm)Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Maple Grove 942 0 1,105 70.5 0 1,100 68.2 3,073 0 1,099 67.7 J-95 943 3.6 1,105 70.1 10.8 1,100 67.7 3,175 21.6 1,099 67.3 J-96 945 1.6 1,105 69.2 4.8 1,100 66.9 4,251 9.6 1,099 66.4 J-100 941 0 1,105 70.9 0 1,100 68.6 4,791 0 1,099 68.2 J-101 947 0 1,105 68.3 0 1,100 66.1 5,000 0 1,099 65.8 J-102 953 4.8 1,105 65.7 14.4 1,100 63.5 5,000 28.8 1,099 63.2 J-94 952 3.4 1,105 66.2 10.2 1,100 63.9 3,073 20.4 1,099 63.4 J-103 946 1.4 1,105 68.8 4.2 1,100 66.5 3,175 8.4 1,099 66 J-158 943 4.2 1,105 70.1 12.6 1,100 67.8 5,000 25.2 1,099 67.5 J-182 930 0 1,105 75.7 0 1,100 73.5 5,000 0 1,099 73.3 J-183 940 0 1,105 71.4 0 1,100 69.2 5,000 0 1,099 69 J-185 941 3.4 1,105 70.9 10.2 1,100 68.7 5,000 20.4 1,099 68.3 J-186 927 3 1,105 77 9 1,100 74.7 5,000 18 1,099 74.4 J-187 926 0 1,105 77.4 0 1,100 75.1 5,000 0 1,099 74.7 J-188 940 0 1,105 71.4 0 1,100 69.1 4,924 0 1,099 68.7 J-189 946 4.2 1,105 68.8 12.6 1,100 66.5 4,208 25.2 1,099 66 J-190 944 2.8 1,105 69.6 8.4 1,100 67.3 4,970 16.8 1,099 66.9 J-191 947 5.2 1,105 68.3 15.6 1,100 66 4,375 31.2 1,099 65.6 J-192 946 3.2 1,105 68.8 9.6 1,100 66.5 4,701 19.2 1,099 66 J-245 945 4.2 1,105 69.2 12.6 1,100 66.9 2,178 25.2 1,099 66.4 J-246 938 0 1,105 72.2 0 1,100 69.9 1,772 0 1,099 69.5 J-247 942 1.8 1,105 70.5 5.4 1,100 68.2 3,336 10.8 1,099 67.7 J-248 950 3.2 1,105 67 9.6 1,100 64.7 3,097 19.2 1,099 64.3 J-249 945.5 2.2 1,105 69 6.6 1,100 66.7 3,472 13.2 1,099 66.2 J-254 950 0 1,105 67.1 0 1,100 64.8 5,000 0 1,100 64.7 J-261 946 22.1 1,105 68.8 66.2 1,100 66.5 2,562 132.4 1,099 66.2 J-262 952 8.6 1,105 66.2 25.8 1,100 64 3,255 51.6 1,099 63.8 J-263 950.3 56.8 1,105 66.9 170.4 1,100 64.7 5,000 340.8 1,100 64.6 J-264 952 25.8 1,105 66.2 77.5 1,100 64 5,000 155.1 1,100 64 J-265 952.2 9.2 1,105 66.1 27.6 1,100 63.9 5,000 51.6 1,100 63.8 J-267 953 0 1,105 65.8 0 1,100 63.6 5,000 0 1,100 63.6 J-271 943 5 1,105 70.1 15 1,100 67.8 3,825 30 1,099 67.3 J-272 943 4.4 1,105 70.1 13.2 1,100 67.8 3,963 26.4 1,099 67.3 J-273 944 3.8 1,105 69.6 11.4 1,100 67.3 4,106 22.8 1,099 66.9 J-274 945 3 1,105 69.2 9 1,100 66.9 5,000 18 1,099 66.5 J-275 946 3.8 1,105 68.8 11.4 1,100 66.5 4,658 22.8 1,099 66.1 J-276 942 0 1,105 70.5 0 1,100 68.2 4,783 0 1,099 67.8 J-277 944 2.2 1,105 69.6 6.6 1,100 67.3 2,979 13.2 1,099 66.9 J-278 943 0 1,105 70.1 0 1,100 67.8 4,324 0 1,099 67.4 J-279 947 2 1,105 68.3 6 1,100 66 3,191 12 1,099 65.7 J-280 940 0 1,105 71.4 0 1,100 69.1 4,473 0 1,099 68.7 J-281 945 3.6 1,105 69.2 10.8 1,100 66.9 5,000 21.6 1,099 66.6 J-282 935 2.6 1,105 73.5 7.8 1,100 71.3 3,342 15.6 1,099 71 J-283 932 0 1,105 74.8 0 1,100 72.5 5,000 0 1,099 72.2 J-284 938 5 1,105 72.2 15 1,100 69.9 4,497 30 1,099 69.5 J-285 944 4.6 1,105 69.6 13.8 1,100 67.4 5,000 27.6 1,099 67.1 J-286 953 3.2 1,105 65.7 9.6 1,100 63.5 5,000 19.2 1,099 63.2 J-287 950 2.8 1,105 67 8.4 1,100 64.8 2,731 16.8 1,099 64.5 Average Day Demand Maximum Day Demand Peak Hour Demand Node Label Elevation (ft) Table 2 Water Model Results Scenario 2 - Tower Off, Maple Grove On Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi)Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi)Fire Flow (Available) (gpm)Demand (gpm)Hydraulic Grade (ft)Pressure (psi) Maple Grove 942 0 1,093 65.3 0 1,092 65 5,000 0 1,090 64.2 J-95 943 3.6 1,093 64.8 10.8 1,092 64.3 5,000 21.6 1,088 62.8 J-96 945 1.6 1,093 63.8 4.8 1,090 62.6 3,190 9.6 1,081 59 J-100 941 0 1,093 65.5 0 1,089 64.1 2,775 0 1,079 59.9 J-101 947 0 1,092 62.9 0 1,088 61.1 2,382 0 1,076 55.8 J-102 953 4.8 1,092 60.3 14.4 1,088 58.5 2,342 28.8 1,076 53.2 J-94 952 3.4 1,093 60.9 10.2 1,092 60.6 5,000 20.4 1,089 59.4 J-103 946 1.4 1,093 63.5 4.2 1,092 63 5,000 8.4 1,088 61.5 J-158 943 4.2 1,092 64.6 12.6 1,088 62.8 2,292 25.2 1,076 57.5 J-182 930 0 1,092 70.2 0 1,088 68.4 2,281 0 1,075 62.9 J-183 940 0 1,092 65.9 0 1,088 64.1 2,274 0 1,075 58.6 J-185 941 3.4 1,092 65.5 10.2 1,088 63.8 2,445 20.4 1,076 58.6 J-186 927 3 1,092 71.6 9 1,089 69.9 2,521 18 1,077 64.9 J-187 926 0 1,092 72 0 1,089 70.5 2,650 0 1,078 65.9 J-188 940 0 1,092 66 0 1,089 64.5 2,731 0 1,079 60.2 J-189 946 4.2 1,093 63.4 12.6 1,090 62.2 3,251 25.2 1,081 58.6 J-190 944 2.8 1,092 64.2 8.4 1,089 62.6 2,613 16.8 1,078 57.8 J-191 947 5.2 1,092 62.9 15.6 1,089 61.3 2,473 31.2 1,077 56.5 J-192 946 3.2 1,092 63.4 9.6 1,089 61.8 2,700 19.2 1,078 57.3 J-245 945 4.2 1,093 63.8 12.6 1,090 62.6 1,886 25.2 1,081 59 J-246 938 0 1,093 66.9 0 1,090 65.7 1,578 0 1,081 62 J-247 942 1.8 1,093 65.2 5.4 1,091 64.6 4,824 10.8 1,087 62.6 J-248 950 3.2 1,093 61.8 9.6 1,091 61 3,910 19.2 1,086 58.9 J-249 945.5 2.2 1,093 63.7 6.6 1,091 62.9 4,350 13.2 1,086 60.6 J-254 950 0 1,092 61.6 0 1,088 59.7 2,264 0 1,075 54.2 J-261 946 22.1 1,092 63.3 66.2 1,088 61.4 1,582 132.4 1,075 55.7 J-262 952 8.6 1,092 60.7 25.8 1,088 58.9 1,732 51.6 1,075 53.3 J-263 950.3 56.8 1,092 61.5 170.4 1,088 59.6 2,258 340.8 1,075 54.1 J-264 952 25.8 1,092 60.7 77.5 1,088 58.9 2,233 155.1 1,075 53.3 J-265 952.2 9.2 1,092 60.6 27.6 1,088 58.8 2,243 51.6 1,075 53.2 J-267 953 0 1,092 60.3 0 1,088 58.4 2,223 0 1,075 52.9 J-271 943 5 1,093 64.7 15 1,090 63.7 3,647 30 1,083 60.7 J-272 943 4.4 1,092 64.7 13.2 1,089 63.1 2,460 26.4 1,078 58.4 J-273 944 3.8 1,092 64.2 11.4 1,089 62.6 2,448 22.8 1,077 57.8 J-274 945 3 1,092 63.8 9 1,089 62.1 2,524 18 1,077 57.1 J-275 946 3.8 1,092 63.3 11.4 1,088 61.6 2,344 22.8 1,077 56.5 J-276 942 0 1,092 65.1 0 1,089 63.4 2,443 0 1,077 58.3 J-277 944 2.2 1,092 64.2 6.6 1,089 62.5 1,967 13.2 1,077 57.5 J-278 943 0 1,092 64.6 0 1,088 62.9 2,298 0 1,077 57.9 J-279 947 2 1,092 62.9 6 1,088 61.2 2,000 12 1,077 56.1 J-280 940 0 1,092 65.9 0 1,088 64.2 2,358 0 1,077 59.1 J-281 945 3.6 1,092 63.8 10.8 1,088 62 2,411 21.6 1,076 56.7 J-282 935 2.6 1,092 68.1 7.8 1,088 66.3 2,029 15.6 1,076 61.1 J-283 932 0 1,092 69.4 0 1,089 67.8 2,579 0 1,078 63 J-284 938 5 1,092 66.8 15 1,089 65.2 2,526 30 1,077 60.2 J-285 944 4.6 1,092 64.2 13.8 1,088 62.4 2,377 27.6 1,076 57.1 J-286 953 3.2 1,092 60.3 9.6 1,088 58.5 2,296 19.2 1,076 53.2 J-287 950 2.8 1,092 61.6 8.4 1,088 59.8 1,712 16.8 1,076 54.5 Average Day Demand Maximum Day Demand Peak Hour Demand Node Label Elevation (ft) Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Wright County VVPTW !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(CR-116H u n t e r s Rdg H illside Dr Brockton La NAlvaradoLaNDarrel La Dassel La OswaldFarmRdSti e g R d 97th Ave N CityofCorcoranCityofMapleGroveNortheast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP Maple Grove J-95 J-96 J-100 J-101 J-102 J-94J-103 J-158 J-182J-183 J-185 J-186 J-187 J-188 J-189J-190 J-191 J-192 J-245 J-246 J-247 J-248 J-249 J-254J-261 J-262 J-263 J-264 J-265 J-267 J-271 J-272 J-273 J-274 J-275 J-276 J-277J-278 J-279J-280 J-281 J-282 J-283 J-284 J-285 J-286 J-287 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadfigures\watercadfigures.aprx Revised: 2023-03-30 By: bschafermeyerLegend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries Hope Community Church Development Location Water System FacilityVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank !(Junction Water Main Diameter 8 Inch 12 Inch 16 Inch 20 Inch 24 Inch Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Imagery (At original document size of 11x17) 1:7,200 0 300 600 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-30 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran Hope Church Development Pipe Network 1 Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Wright County VVPTW !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(CR-116H unters Rdg H illside Dr Brockton La NAlvaradoLaNDarrel La Dassel La OswaldFarmRdStiegRd 97th Ave N CityofCorcoranCityofMapleGroveNortheast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP 70.5 PSI 70.1 PSI 69.2 PSI 70.9 PSI 68.3 PSI 65.7 PSI 66.2 PSI68.8 PSI 70.1 PSI 75.7 PSI 71.4 PSI 70.9 PSI 77 PSI 77.4 PSI 71.4 PSI 68.8 PSI69.6 PSI 68.3 PSI 68.8 PSI 69.2 PSI 72.2 PSI 70.5 PSI 67 PSI 69 PSI 67.1 PSI68.8 PSI 66.2 PSI 66.9 PSI 66.2 PSI 66.1 PSI 65.8 PSI 70.1 PSI 70.1 PSI 69.6 PSI 69.2 PSI 68.8 PSI 70.5 PSI 69.6 PSI70.1 PSI 68.3 PSI71.4 PSI69.2 PSI 73.5 PSI 74.8 PSI 72.2 PSI 69.6 PSI 65.7 PSI 67 PSI Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadfigures\watercadfigures.aprx Revised: 2023-03-30 By: bschafermeyerLegend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries Hope Community Church Development Location Water System FacilityVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Water System Pressure !(< 35 PSI !(35-50 PSI !(50-65 PSI !(65-80 PSI !(80-95 PSI !(>95 PSI Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Imagery (At original document size of 11x17) 1:7,200 0 300 600 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-30 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran Hope Church Development Average Day Water Distribution System Pressure: Tower On 2 System Conditions: Average day demand: 0.48 MGD Storage Tank: 5 ft below overflow WTP high service pump off Maple grove connection: OFF 0.32 Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Wright County VVPTW !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(CR-116H unters Rdg H illside Dr Brockton La NAlvaradoLaNDarrel La Dassel La OswaldFarmRdStiegRd 97th Ave N CityofCorcoranCityofMapleGroveNortheast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP 3072.6 GPM 3174.5 GPM 4250.8 GPM 4791 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 3072.6 GPM3174.5 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 4924.4 GPM 4208.3 GPM4969.5 GPM 4375.3 GPM 4700.6 GPM 2177.8 GPM 1772.4 GPM 3336.1 GPM 3096.7 GPM 3472 GPM 5000 GPM2562.4 GPM 3254.8 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 3824.9 GPM 3962.6 GPM 4105.8 GPM 5000 GPM 4658.3 GPM 4783.1 GPM 2979.1 GPM4324.1 GPM 3190.6 GPM 4472.8 GPM 5000 GPM 3342.2 GPM 5000 GPM 4497.1 GPM 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 2731 GPM Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadfigures\watercadfigures.aprx Revised: 2023-03-30 By: bschafermeyerLegend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries Hope Community Church Development Location Water System FacilityVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Available Fire Flow !(500-1,000 GPM !(1,000-2,500 GPM !(2,500-3,500 GPM !(> 3,500 GPM Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Imagery (At original document size of 11x17) 1:7,200 0 300 600 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-30 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran Hope Church Development Maximum Day Available Fire Flow: Tower On 3 System Conditions: Maximum day demand: 1.44 MGD Storage Tank: 10 ft below overflow WTP high service pump off Maple grove connection: OFF 0.95 Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Wright County VVPTW !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(CR-116H unters Rdg H illside Dr Brockton La NAlvaradoLaNDarrel La Dassel La OswaldFarmRdStiegRd 97th Ave N CityofCorcoranCityofMapleGroveNortheast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP 65.3 PSI 64.8 PSI 63.8 PSI 65.5 PSI 62.9 PSI 60.3 PSI 60.9 PSI63.5 PSI 64.6 PSI 70.2 PSI 65.9 PSI 65.5 PSI 71.6 PSI 72 PSI 66 PSI 63.4 PSI64.2 PSI 62.9 PSI 63.4 PSI 63.8 PSI 66.9 PSI 65.2 PSI 61.8 PSI 63.7 PSI 61.6 PSI63.3 PSI 60.7 PSI 61.5 PSI 60.7 PSI 60.6 PSI 60.3 PSI 64.7 PSI 64.7 PSI 64.2 PSI 63.8 PSI 63.3 PSI 65.1 PSI 64.2 PSI64.6 PSI 62.9 PSI65.9 PSI63.8 PSI 68.1 PSI 69.4 PSI 66.8 PSI 64.2 PSI 60.3 PSI 61.6 PSI Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadfigures\watercadfigures.aprx Revised: 2023-03-30 By: bschafermeyerLegend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries Hope Community Church Development Location Water System FacilityVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Water System Pressure !(<35 PSI !(35-50 PSI !(50-65 PSI !(65-80 PSI !(80-95 PSI !(>95 PSI Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Imagery (At original document size of 11x17) 1:7,200 0 300 600 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-30 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran Hope Church Development Average Day Water Distribution System Pressure: Maple Grove On 4 System Conditions: Average day demand: 0.48 MGD Storage Tank: OFFLINE WTP high service pump off Maple grove connection: ON 0.32 Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Wright County VVPTW !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(CR-116H unters Rdg H illside Dr Brockton La NAlvaradoLaNDarrel La Dassel La OswaldFarmRdStiegRd 97th Ave N CityofCorcoranCityofMapleGroveNortheast Elevated Tank Northeast WTP 5000 GPM 5000 GPM 3190.3 GPM 2775.3 GPM 2382.4 GPM 2342 GPM 5000 GPM5000 GPM 2291.5 GPM 2280.6 GPM 2274.2 GPM 2444.5 GPM 2520.7 GPM 2649.6 GPM 2730.9 GPM 3250.9 GPM2612.5 GPM 2472.6 GPM 2700.2 GPM 1886.3 GPM 1577.9 GPM 4824.2 GPM 3910.2 GPM 4349.7 GPM 2264.1 GPM1582.3 GPM 1731.6 GPM 2258 GPM 2232.5 GPM 2243 GPM 2222.8 GPM 3647.4 GPM 2459.5 GPM 2447.5 GPM 2524.2 GPM 2343.9 GPM 2442.8 GPM 1966.7 GPM2297.7 GPM 2000.3 GPM 2357.7 GPM 2411.2 GPM 2028.7 GPM 2579.1 GPM 2526 GPM 2377 GPM 2295.6 GPM 1711.6 GPM Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806102\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadfigures\watercadfigures.aprx Revised: 2023-03-30 By: bschafermeyerLegend County Parcels Municipal Boundaries Hope Community Church Development Location Water System FacilityVVPTWWater Treatment Plant Storage Tank Water Main Available Fire Flow !(500-1,000 GPM !(1,000-2,500 GPM !(2,500-3,500 GPM !(> 3,500 GPM Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Imagery (At original document size of 11x17) 1:7,200 0 300 600 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-30 T119N, R23W, S11 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806102 City of Corcoran Hope Church Development Maximum Day Available Fire Flow: Maple Grove On 5 System Conditions: Maximum day demand: 1.44 MGD Storage Tank: OFFLINE WTP high service pump off Maple grove connection: ON 0.95 Well Locations from NE Water Feasibility 2021 Feasibility Report Supplements 2020 Northeast Water System June 4, 2021 Prepared for: City of Corcoran Figure 1 Geologic Map with Planned and Potential Municipal Well Locations APPENDIX C Stormwater Modeling Guidelines Floodplain City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake 456710 R u s h C reekRushCreek SouthForkRu s h C r e e k SouthForkRushCree k 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: V:\2277\resource\gis\Corcoran\Pro\Comp_Plan\Comp_Plan.aprx Date: 2023-03-27 Time: 9:12 AM User: kberglund City ofCORCORAN Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Floodway 100 Year Floodplain A AE 500 Year Floodplain 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD Map App C-1 Floodplain Stormwater Modeling Guidelines Stormwater Guidelines for Development March 2019 Issue Cities changing from rural to urban development are challenged by the additional stormwater generated due to construction of impervious surfaces, along with the offsite infrastructure, or lack thereof, to manage effectively. To standardize the modeling and review process, the guidelines below were created for efficiency. Note: A watershed approval is required per Elm Creek WMO rules, which also reviews flow rates, water quality and volume management. Modeling Watershed Information · Provide an aerial photo of the development that includes the overall watershed and subwatershed boundaries · Provide a summary of the acreage to each discharge point leaving the site. Any increase (or decrease) shall be identified. · Show any floodplain adjacent to project or within the project · Show downstream water bodies and flow paths o Downstream flow paths and water bodies typically need to have elevations, inverts, and condition identified. Subwatersheds A HydroCAD model (typically used) has inputs that can vary by user. To minimize resubmittals, review time and effort, the following data shall be utilized. · Electronic model shall be submitted · Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) shall be lowered one category due to the mass grading and compaction of the soils. For example, an existing B soil, shall be modeled as a proposed C soil (unless it remains undisturbed) · Wetlands, filtration basins, and ponds shall be modeled at CN of 98 · Identify peak rates for storm events and proposed shall be equal or less than existing rates. o Note: There are certain conditions where at City’s discretion the off-site conditions require a reduction in flow rate from existing rates. · SWMM (i.e. EPA-, XP-, or PC-) models can be submitted for review, however these increase review time. Model Setup for Outlet Control Structures, NWLs and Infiltration · The model’s flow control structures (OCS, culverts, etc.) shall match the construction plan information. During the plan and model review both may be modified and revised · Individual detail plates are required for each OCS, and individual plates shall have inverts identified · A pond or wetland NWL (and model starting elevation) shall be set at the constructed outlet control elevation. o No live storage shall be utilized below the controlling OCS elevation. o No live storage shall be used for filtration shelves on ponds below controlling OCS elevation · If a pond or wetland has an NWL (wet surface), infiltration shall not be used in flood routing. · If a pond has filtration BMP causing drawdown below the NWL, this drawdown elevation shall not be used as the NWL for flood routing. (Filtration has a slower release time and during wet periods is not available as live storage). Construction Plans Catch Basins · Street drainage shall be sufficient to manage the 10-year event · Typical a CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly · Three inches (0.25 feet) of head on a CB will inundate a street centerline (2% slope). · Spacing is 200 to 250 feet using longitudinal street dimensions of 40 feet from road centerline to half the house footprint (assumes rear half of house drains to rear yard). Dimensions equal 10,000 SF. · CBs may be required on both sides of ped ramps to capture flows Natural Drainage Features · Waterbodies receiving urban drainage (wetlands, ditches, gullies) may need to have OCS installed, erosion protection, or reduced flow rates to allow the feature to function over the long term due to more consistent flows from increased impervious via development · Offsite work may be necessary and City will assist with coordination, easements, etc. HWLs and EOFs · The freeboard requirements are: o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the HWL o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the EOF · EOFs shall be accurately shown and as builts are required. The highest point shall be the EOF (for example top of curb) since this is the controlling elevation o In certain instances, channel calculations of the swale may be required to show the EOF has capacity to manage estimated flow · Overland EOFs are preferred, however if a second pipe serves as an EOF then modeling will include a 100-year event using the second pipe (EOF) as the only outlet (primary outlet plugged). Rear Yards · Rear yards or swales less than 2% shall have draintile. Typically, every two to three lots will require rear yard CBs. Sump Connections · Houses adjoining a wetland or pond do not need individual sump connection · Others will have access to rear yard stormsewer. Offsite Impacts Adjacent Parcels · City will review adjacent parcels (downstream and upstream) for impacts from volume, point discharge, etc. and may require off site improvements. City will assist in coordination of any off site work. · Off site water quality improvement projects may be determined by the City for assistance with compliance with City’s TMDL approach of implementing improvements upon development. · FEMA modifications may be necessary due to development and implemented by City. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Steve Hegland, PE Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Project/File: 227704908 Date: July 20, 2023 Subject: Request for Authorization to Bid – Horseshoe Bend Drive Drainage Improvements Council Action Requested We are requesting that the City Council review and accept the plans and specifications for the Horseshoe Bend Drive Drainage Improvements as presented. Attached to this memo are select plan sheets from the project as well as the advertisement for bid. Project Description The Horseshoe Bend Drive Drainage Improvement project includes the replacement of existing culverts as well as ditch improvements along a portion of Horseshoe Bend Drive and Rolling Hills Road. Much of the streets and drainage system in the Schnells Highland Acres development was constructed with the original development in the 1970’s and 1980’s. Residents within this neighborhood shared concerns that the stormwater conveyance system in this area was undersized and not functioning properly which was leading to the roadway overtopping and runoff going through yards. The drainage in this area was further studied by Stantec and the City Council authorized the design of improvement project to accommodate a 10-year design storm which is an industry standard. This project includes the replacement and upsizing of four driveway culverts as well as upsizing of two roadway crossings. An addition, three corrugated metal roadway culverts are being replaced in kind with concrete culverts with this project. One of the culverts being replaced with this project is within the limits of the Garages Too development. At the time of their approval, a condition was added to the development approval that the applicant was responsible for the replacement of their driveway culvert if a drainage improvement project were to be performed. Once bids are received on this project, we will present the costs to the developer and discuss with them the opportunity to leave the culvert replacement and grading in this project (with them responsible for their proportional share) or self-performing this work to the same standards as the design. Communication lines for two of the small utility companies (Charter and Lumen) are being coordinated for relocation ahead of this project. Both companies have communicated that they can relocate the lines prior to the construction beginning. Agenda Item: 7f. July 20, 2023 Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director Page 2 of 2 Reference: Request to Bid – Horseshoe Bend Drive Drainage Improvements Estimated Project Costs Below is a breakdown of the estimated project costs with a detailed cost breakdown attached to this memo. These costs are less than the estimated project costs at the time of the feasibility study which was $267,767.00 Project Estimated Cost Horseshoe Bend Drive Drainage Improvements $206,310.50 Estimated Engineering/Admin $51,577.63 Estimated Total Project Costs $257,888.13 Project Schedule Below is an outline of the project schedule. Because access to the St. Therese facility will be important through this construction project, the utilities on the project will be constructed in a northern phase and a southern phase to facilitate their construction. Council Authorizes Ad for Bids July 27th, 2023 Bid Opening September 6th, 2023 Construction Fall 2023 Final Restoration Spring 2024 Engineer’s Recommendation We recommend that the City Council review and Accept the Plans and Specification and authorize the advertisement for bids for the Horseshoe Bend Drive Drainage Improvements. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Steven Hegland, PE Project Engineer Attachments: ·Advertisement for Bid ·Cost Estimate ·Horseshoe Bend Drive Drainage Improvement Plans Project No. 227704908 Advertisement for Bids 00 11 13-1 SECTION 00 11 13 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS Electronic Bid Proposals will be received by the City of Corcoran, 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, Minnesota 55340, on the QuestCDN.com website via the VirtuBid electronic bidding application. Only electronic bids will be accepted for this project. Bids will be received on the QuestCDN.com website, until 1:00 p.m., Wednesday, September 6th, 2023 at which time such bids will be publicly opened electronically and reviewed for the furnishing of all labor, materials, and all else necessary for the following: HORSESHOEBEND BEND DRIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS The work, in accordance with Drawings and Specifications prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc., consists of the following major items of work and approximate quantities: 350 Square Yards Bituminous Removal and Replacement 190 Linear Feet CPEP Pipe Replacement 304 Linear Feet RCP Pipe Replacement 140 Cubic Yards Common Excavation Together with selective demolition, traffic control, erosion controls, restoration, and other related appurtenances. Each bid proposal shall be accompanied by a "Bid Security" in the form of a certified check made payable to the City of Corcoran” (OWNER) in the amount not less than five percent (5%) of the total bid, or a surety bond in the same amount, running to the OWNER, with the surety company thereon duly authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota. Such Bid Security to be a guarantee that the bidder will not, without the consent of the OWNER, withdraw their bid for a period of sixty (60) days after the opening of bids, and if awarded a contract, will enter into a contract with the OWNER; and the amount of the certified check will be retained or the bond enforced by the OWNER in case the bidder fails to do so. All bid securities except those of the three lowest bidders will be returned within five days after the opening of bids. Eligible Bidders for this project must meet the Minimum Criteria as defined in the Responsible Contractor Requirement in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 16C.285, subdivision 3, and additional criteria required by the OWNER. Bid Proposals shall be submitted on forms furnished for that purpose. Bids shall be submitted electronically through the QuestCDN website in accordance with the Instructions to Bidders. No bidder shall withdraw their bid, without the consent of the OWNER, for the period of days indicated above after the date for the opening thereof. The OWNER, however, reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any minor irregularities, informalities, or discrepancies. A work history detailing qualifications and past experience must be provided upon request. Project No. 227704908 Advertisement for Bids 00 11 13-2 The Project Manual is available on QuestCDN (www.questcdn.com). You may download the digital plan documents for $40.00 by inputting Quest Project #xxxxx on the website’s project search page. Please contact QuestCDN at 952-233-1632 or info@questcdn.com for assistance in free membership registration, downloading, and working with this digital project information, and submission of electronic bids. Direct inquiries to Steve Hegland at (763) 479-4237 or steven.hegland@stantec.com Steven Hegland Project Engineer Stantec Consulting Services PUBLISHED: QuestCDN.com: August 3, 2023 Crow River News August 3, 2023 COST ESTIMATE CITY OF CORCORAN HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Bid Item Description Units Unit Price Quantity Total Cost 1 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM $ 15,000.00 1.0 $15,000.00 2 CLEARING EACH $ 750.00 17 $12,750.00 3 GRUBBING EACH $ 750.00 17 $12,750.00 4 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT $ 5.00 345 $1,725.00 5 REMOVE STORM SEWER CULVERT LIN FT $ 25.00 339 $8,475.00 6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD $ 10.00 349 $3,490.00 7 SALVAGE AND RESPREAD LANDSCAPE ROCK SQ YD $ 200.00 5 $1,000.00 8 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (LV)CU YD $ 50.00 140 $7,000.00 9 STRIP, STOCKPILE, AND RESPREAD TOPSOIL LUMP SUM $ 3,000.00 1 $3,000.00 10 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 4 SQ YD $ 3.00 60 $180.00 11 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR $ 150.00 8 $1,200.00 12 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED TON $ 35.00 18 $630.00 13 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 10.00 20 $200.00 14 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B)TON $ 150.00 40 $6,000.00 15 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B)TON $ 150.00 50 $7,500.00 16 15" RC PIPE APRON EACH $ 1,500.00 4 $6,000.00 17 18" RC PIPE APRON EACH $ 1,750.00 4 $7,000.00 18 21" RC PIPE APRON EACH $ 2,500.00 4 $10,000.00 19 21" CPEP PIPE APRON EACH $ 750.00 8 $6,000.00 20 24" CPEP PIPE APRON EACH $ 1,500.00 2 $3,000.00 21 27" CPEP PIPE APRON EACH $ 2,000.00 2 $4,000.00 22 21" CPEP LIN FT $ 100.00 110 $11,000.00 23 24" CPEP LIN FT $ 110.00 25 $2,750.00 24 27" CPEP LIN FT $ 120.00 53 $6,360.00 25 15" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V LIN FT $ 65.00 88 $5,720.00 26 18" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V LIN FT $ 85.00 88 $7,480.00 27 21" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V LIN FT $ 100.00 128 $12,800.00 28 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM $ 5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 29 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH $ 200.00 12 $2,400.00 30 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT $ 5.00 300 $1,500.00 31 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAW - MAINTAINED LIN FT $ 5.00 80 $400.00 32 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25 SQ YD $ 5.00 1264 $6,320.00 33 MnDOT SEED MIXTURE 25-141 SQ YD $ 5.00 1585 $7,925.00 34 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (EV)CU YD $ 50.00 20 $1,000.00 $187,555.00 $18,755.50 $206,310.50 $51,577.63 $257,888.13 July 19, 2023 227704908 25% ENGINEERING/ADMIN ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS BASE BID CONSTRUCTION COSTS 10% CONTINGENCY TOTAL BASE BID COSTS ROLLING HILLS ROAD HIGHWAY 55/OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAYPROJECT LOCATIONHORSESHOE TRAILHO R S E S H O E BEN D D R I V E CONSTRUCTION PLANSFORHORSESHOE BEND DRIVE DRAINAGEIMPROVEMENTSWARNING:THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALLCOOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FORTHE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIEDSTRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.GOPHER STATE ONE CALLTWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166CALL BEFORE YOU DIGOWNER:CITY OF CORCORAN8200 COUNTY ROAD 116CORCORAN, MN 55340ENGINEER:STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 100PLYMOUTH, MN 55447CONTACT: STEVEN K. HEGLAND, P.E.PH: (763) 479-4237PROJECT LOCATION MAPNOT TO SCALEPROJECT LOCATIONCITY: CORCORANCOUNTY: HENNEPINCORCORAN, MN 55340JULY 2023THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 8 SHEETS07/05/2023 ISSUED FOR BID 0DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:227704908\\US0242-PPFSS01\shared_projects\227704908\drafting\5_DESIGN\1_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\227704908-G001-Title.dwg DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:7/5/2023 1:05:01 PM CLIENT:CITY OFCORCORANHORSESHOE BEND DRIVE CULVERT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CORCORAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT TITLE:ADGCHK'D BY:NPWAPP'D BY:SKHCERTIFICATION:8200 COUNTY ROAD 116CORCORAN , MN 55340ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 100PLYMOUTH MN, 55447PHONE: 763-479-4200FAX: 763-479-4242WWW.STANTEC.COM07/05/20230DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 5224307/05/2023STEVEN HEGLANDOF81TITLE SHEETINDEXSHEET NO. SHEET TITLE1 TITLE SHEET2 GENERAL NOTES AND LEGEND3 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS4-5 SITE AND GRADING PLAN6 DETAILS7-8 CROSS SECTIONS ►►►►►►►►►►►►►► ► ► ► ► ► ► 18" R C P►►►►HORSESHOEBENDDRIVE33+0034+0035+0036+0037+0038+0039+0040+0041+00►►►►►►►►►►►►24" CPEP27" CPEP21" CPEP21" CPEP18" RCP 6P-1NINV EL:986.50STA:37+85.94℄-DITCHOFF:-2.00L5P-2NINV EL:987.00STA:37+57.50℄-DITCHOFF:-1.98L3P-1INV EL:1004.70STA:33+24.12℄-DITCHOFF:0.13R4P-2INV EL:992.80STA:35+77.54℄-DITCHOFF:0.005P-1INV EL:991.75STA:36+30.07℄-DITCHOFF:0.006P-2NINV EL:985.10STA:38+92.47℄-DITCHOFF:-2.25L7P-1NINV EL:984.60STA:39+19.54℄-DITCHOFF:-2.25L7P-2INV EL:983.50STA:40+10.79℄-DITCHOFF:0.008P-1INV EL:983.00STA:40+62.79℄-DITCHOFF:0.00R► ► ► ► ► ►7P-3INV EL:983.54STA:40+09.44℄-DITCHOFF:5.39R11P-1INV EL:982.51STA:21+37.29℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADOFF:27.29R18" R C P►►►►►►7P-1SINV EL:984.60STA:39+19.52℄-DITCHOFF:2.25R6P-2SINV EL:985.10STA:38+92.50℄-DITCHOFF:2.25R5P-2SINV EL:987.00STA:37+57.75℄-DITCHOFF:2.01R6P-1SINV EL:986.50STA:37+85.68℄-DITCHOFF:2.00R4P-1INV EL:1003.87STA:33+49.31℄-DITCHOFF:0.17R985990995 1000 10051010 981982983984986987988989 991 992 993 994 996997998 999 100110021003100410061007100810091011101210131014 990995 1000100510101010101010151015 988 988 988 9889899919929939949969979989991001100210031004 1006100710081009101110111011 101210121012101310131013 101410141014 990 995 1000 1005 988 989 991 992 993 994 996 997 998 999 1001 1002 1003 1004 100610071008 10099809859909 9 5 9 7 8 979981982983984986987988989991 992993994 985990 990995 995982983984986987988989 989991 991992 992993 993994 994996 99624" PIPE APRON24" PIPE APRON27" PIPE APRON27" PIPE APRON2-21" PIPE APRON2-21" PIPE APRON2-21" PIPE APRON2-21" PIPE APRON18" RC P I P E A P R O N 18" RC P I P E A P R O N 18" RC P I P E A P R O N 18" RC P I P E A P R O NEX D&UEASEMENTEX ROW984983982981980INSTALL R I P R A P100910061004997994992990 988 986984984983 MATCH LIN E - 1 AT STATIO N - 3 9 + 5 0 . 0 0 NEXT SHE E T N U M B E R : 5DITCH PROFILE975980990100010109759809901000101032+0032+2532+5032+7533+0033+2533+5033+7534+0034+2534+5034+7535+0035+2535+5035+7536+0036+2536+5036+7537+0037+2537+5037+7538+0038+2538+5038+7539+0039+2539+506P-2NSTA=38+92.47INV=985.106P-1NSTA=37+85.94INV=986.504P-1STA=33+49.31INV=1003.874P-2STA=35+77.54INV=992.805P-1STA=36+30.07INV=991.757P-1NSTA=39+19.54INV=984.605P-2NSTA=37+57.50INV=987.003P-1STA=33+24.12INV=1004.702 - 27 LF OF 21" CPEP @ 1.85%APPROX COVER 1.4'2 - 28 LF OF 21" CPEP @ 1.78%APPROX COVER 1.1'53 LF OF 27" CPEP @ 2.00%APPROX COVER 1.9'25 LF OF 24" CPEP @ 3.31%APPROX COVER 1.2'GB:39+19.35 984.600 -1.31%GB:37+85.66 986.500 GB:38+92.65 985.100 -5.00%GB:36+92.72 990.259 GB:37+57.91 987.000 -2.00%GB:33+48.951003.874GB:33+88.211003.089 EXISTING20 LF OF 15" PIPE CULVERT @ 3.38%EXISTING53 LF OF 15" PIPE CULVERT @ 2.91%EXISTING28 LF OF 18" PIPE CULVERT @ -1.10%EXISTING27 LF OF 18" PIPE CULVERT @ 1.37%EXISTING INV=985.85 EXISTING INV=986.22 EXISTING INV=988.08 EXISTING INV=987.77 EXISTING INV=992.63 EXISTING INV=994.16 EXISTINGINV=1005.54EXISTINGINV=1006.23 -2.00%GB:36+30.07 991.750 GB:36+66.91 991.013 -7.00%GB:35+09.44997.567 GB:35+77.54 992.800 -9.80%GB:32+61.771010.841GB:33+24.441004.700 EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADE4SITE AND GRADING PLAN07/05/2023 ISSUED FOR BID 0DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:227704908\\US0242-PPFSS01\shared_projects\227704908\drafting\5_DESIGN\1_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\227704908-C301-SiteGradingStorm.dwg DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:7/5/2023 1:05:31 PM CLIENT:CITY OFCORCORANHORSESHOE BEND DRIVE CULVERT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CORCORAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT TITLE:ADGCHK'D BY:NPWAPP'D BY:SKHCERTIFICATION:8200 COUNTY ROAD 116CORCORAN , MN 55340ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 100PLYMOUTH MN, 55447PHONE: 763-479-4200FAX: 763-479-4242WWW.STANTEC.COM07/05/20230DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 5224307/05/2023STEVEN HEGLANDOF8( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE01 inch = 30 ft.306030111111.MATCH EXISTING2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SALVAGING ALLTOPSOIL FROM THE PROJECT TO BE USED FOR RESTORATION.A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED ON RESTOREDAREA. IF CONTRACTOR WASTES OR CONTAMINATES TOPSOILWITHIN THE PROJECT, THEY SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORREPLACING WITH APPROPRIATE MATERIAL AT THEIR EXPENSE.3.EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL SLOPESWHICH ARE 4:1 OR STEEPER.NOTESLEGENDBITUMINOUS ROADWAY PAVEMENT -SEE DETAILSGRAVEL DRIVEWAY RESTORATION -SEE DETAILS►►►►PROPOSED STORM PIPEEXISTING STORM PIPESEED MIXTURE 25-151℄-DITCH℄-HORSESHOE BEND DRIVESEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAWDRAINAGE FLOW ARROW111BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT -SEE DETAILS ►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►18" RCP15" RCP 15" RCP ►►►►►►ROLLING HILLS ROAD39+0040+0041+0042+0043+0044+0045+0045+30►►►►►►►►►►21" CPEP18" RCP21" RCP 6P-2NINV EL:985.10STA:38+92.47℄-DITCHOFF:-2.25L7P-1NINV EL:984.60STA:39+19.54℄-DITCHOFF:-2.25L7P-2INV EL:983.50STA:40+10.79℄-DITCHOFF:0.008P-1INV EL:983.00STA:40+62.79℄-DITCHOFF:0.00R8P-2NINV EL:977.26STA:24+16.31℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADOFF:-21.81L10P-1NINV EL:977.00STA:24+16.28℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADOFF:22.19R►►►►►►►►►►►►►►7P-3INV EL:983.54STA:40+09.44℄-DITCHOFF:5.39R11P-1INV EL:982.51STA:21+37.29℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADOFF:27.29R9P-1INV EL:977.79STA:24+57.14℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADOFF:-21.02L9P-2INV EL:977.31STA:25+02.40℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADOFF:-20.45L10P-2INV EL:976.51STA:24+55.54℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADOFF:22.95R10P-3INV EL:976.10STA:25+03.27℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADOFF:23.59R18" RCP44 LF OF 15" RCP @ 2.91%44 LF OF 15" RCP @ 2.75%►►►►►►10P-1SINV EL:977.10STA:24+12.78℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADOFF:22.18R8P-2SINV EL:977.87STA:24+12.81℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADOFF:-21.81L7P-1SINV EL:984.60STA:39+19.52℄-DITCHOFF:2.25R6P-2SINV EL:985.10STA:38+92.50℄-DITCHOFF:2.25R985981982983984 986988988988988980985990995 976 976 977 978979 981982983984986987988989991992993994 980980985 990990 995995 977977978978979979981982983984986987988 989989 991991 992992 993993 994994 996996 2-21" PIPE APRON18" RC PIPE APRON18" RC PIPE APRON18" RC PIPE APRON18" RC PIPE APRON2-21" RC PIPE APRON2-21" RC PIPE APRON15" RC PIPE APRON15" RC PIPE APRON15" RC PIPE APRON15" RC PIPE APRON979980984983982981980 979979978INSTALL RIP RAP984984983 978MATCH LINE - 1AT STATION - 39+50.00PREVIOUS SHEET NUMBER: 4DITCH PROFILE9609709809901000960970980990100039+5039+7540+0040+2540+5040+7541+0041+2541+5041+7542+0042+2542+5042+7543+0043+2543+5043+7544+0044+258P-1STA=40+62.79INV=983.007P-2STA=40+10.79INV=983.508P-2NSTA=24+16.31INV=977.2610P-1NSTA=24+16.28INV=977.002 - 44 LF OF 21" RCP @ 0.59%APPROX COVER 1.1'52 LF OF 18" RCP @ 0.96%APPROX COVER 2.2'-2.40%GB:40+62.03983.000GB:40+97.82982.141GB:40+11.53983.492 -1.20%EXISTING42 LF OF 18" PIPE CULVERT @ 2.52%EXISTINGINV=983.88EXISTINGINV=982.83 -2.16%GB:42+79.75 978.667 GB:43+44.70 977.265 7P TO 11P PROFILE970980990100010109709809901000101049+8050+0050+2550+5050+7551+00STA:40+00.00983.63-1.20%0.34%GB:50+00.00 983.630GB:50+08.82983.524GB:50+13.44 983.540 7P-3STA=40+09.44INV=983.5411P-1STA=21+37.29 INV=982.5176 LF OF 18" RCP @ 1.36%APPROX COVER 2.6'9P-1 TO 10P-2 PROFILE9609709809901000960970980990100054+0054+2554+5054+7555+0044 LF OF 15" RCP @ 2.91%APPROX COVER 1.5'9P-1STA=24+57.14 INV=977.79 10P-2STA=24+55.54 INV=976.51 9P-2 TO 10P-3 PROFILE9609709809901000960970980990100056+0056+2556+5056+7557+0044 LF OF 15" RCP @ 2.75%APPROX COVER 1.9'10P-3STA=25+03.27 INV=976.10 9P-2STA=25+02.40 INV=977.31EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GROUNDEXISTING GROUNDEXISTING GROUND5SITE AND GRADING PLAN07/05/2023 ISSUED FOR BID 0DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:227704908\\US0242-PPFSS01\shared_projects\227704908\drafting\5_DESIGN\1_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\227704908-C301-SiteGradingStorm.dwg DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:7/5/2023 1:05:37 PM CLIENT:CITY OFCORCORANHORSESHOE BEND DRIVE CULVERT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CORCORAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT TITLE:ADGCHK'D BY:NPWAPP'D BY:SKHCERTIFICATION:8200 COUNTY ROAD 116CORCORAN , MN 55340ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 100PLYMOUTH MN, 55447PHONE: 763-479-4200FAX: 763-479-4242WWW.STANTEC.COM07/05/20230DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 5224307/05/2023STEVEN HEGLANDOF8( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE01 inch = 30 ft.3060301111111℄-DITCH℄-HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE℄-ROLLING HILLS ROADEX D&UEASEMENTEX ROW1.MATCH EXISTING2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SALVAGING ALLTOPSOIL FROM THE PROJECT TO BE USED FOR RESTORATION.A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED ON RESTOREDAREA. IF CONTRACTOR WASTES OR CONTAMINATES TOPSOILWITHIN THE PROJECT, THEY SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORREPLACING WITH APPROPRIATE MATERIAL AT THEIR EXPENSE.3.EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL SLOPESWHICH ARE 4:1 OR STEEPER.NOTESLEGENDBITUMINOUS ROADWAY PAVEMENT -SEE DETAILSGRAVEL DRIVEWAY RESTORATION -SEE DETAILS►►►►PROPOSED STORM PIPEEXISTING STORM PIPESEED MIXTURE 25-151SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAWDRAINAGE FLOW ARROWBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT -SEE DETAILS July 20, 2023 Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55340 Dear Kevin: Reference: State Bond Fund Assistance Stantec is excited to hear that the City of Corcoran was able to secure $10 million dollars in funds to be allocated towards water infrastructure from the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (PFA). It is our understanding that PFA is in the process of drafting the bonding appropriations grant agreement between the State and the City, which will spell out compliance items in greater detail. From past experience, we are familiar with typical bond compliance items and have provided this scope of work to assist the City. We believe the following tasks will be needed to ensure compliance with State bonding funds: Scope of Work Task 100 – Conduct Environmental Review With the PFA funds, we anticipate that the environmental assessment or potentially a categorical exclusion will be necessary. We will assist the City in preparing these documents for submittal on behalf of the City. Typically this is desk top work with a site visit, any more field work would be provided in additional scope. Task 200 – Grant Application and Form Completion During the PFA process, the City will be required to compile the grant application documents which include information on the City as well as pertinent project information. We will assist the City in compiling and preparing this documentation for submittal to the state agency. Even though the funds have been appropriated at the Legislative level, this grant application is still a necessary part of the process. Task 300 – Grant Compliance (Prevailing Wages/Reporting) As the grant is being administered, we will assist the City in ensuring compliance with the grant program. These will include reviewing and documenting the prevailing wage responsibilities of these projects, helping compile annual and final reports on the projects and helping prepare jobs reports for the grant projects. Agenda Item: 7g. July 20th, 2023 Kevin Mattson PE Public Works Director Page 2 of 2 Reference: Bond Funding Assistance Fee and Schedule Project Budget We estimate the fee to provide the scope as described to be approximately $9,000. Any changes to the project scope or estimated hours to complete the work will be communicated to the City in a timely fashion. Stantec will not proceed with additional services or services outside of the scope of work contained in this letter without approval from the City. We hope this letter defines the of scope work and the estimated fee of services to your satisfaction. On behalf of our Stantec team, we thank you for this opportunity to be of service to your community. Regards, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Kent Torve PE (MN, TX, SD), LEED AP City Engineer/ Principal Phone: 612.209.7919 Kent.torve@stantec.com Steve Hegland, PE (MN) Client Manager Phone: 612-741-6548 steven.hegland@stantec.com By signing this proposal, City of Corcoran authorizes Stantec to proceed with the services herein described and the work will be completed in accordance with the existing Master Service Agreement. This proposal is accepted and agreed on the ___________ day of _________,_________ . Per: _____________________________ __________________________ Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director Signature MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Stremel, Senior Project Manager DATE: July 20, 2023 MEETING: July 27, 2023 City Council SUBJECT: Hackamore Rd Improvement Project – Change Order No. 1 Background & Progress to Date The Hackamore Road Improvement Project was officially awarded to Valley Paving, Inc. at the June 6th Council Meeting in the amount of $5,445,445.00. To date, private utility work has been underway for several weeks and the City’s portion of the project began the week of July 17th. Both cities have been working through and agreed to a joint powers agreement (JPA) where the City of Medina is the lead agency for the project and has entered into the contract for construction as such. The City of Corcoran has finalized agreements with the adjacent developers as well. Change Order: There are two main items that warrant a contract change order that include additional street work and a more formal agreement to utilize the staging area adjacent to the project. Both of these items are related to the recent negotiations and agreements with the Lakeview Development Company, LLC. 1.The agreement with the contractor is to utilize an area offsite for material storage and staging. The staging area is located on the north side of Hackamore Rd roughly 1,000 feet east of CR 116 across two properties owned by Lakeview Development Company, LLC. The cities have an existing agreement with the property owner for the use of the property for this purpose and have identified the specific location available for the staging area. The Contractor will be required to adhere to all project specifications related to the maintenance, erosion/sediment control, and restoration in accordance with the specifications in Division 1, section 1806 Storage of Materials. 2. The additional work not included with the original plans and bidding is adjacent one of the future developments east of CR 116 (Lakeview Development property) and generally includes the extension of concrete curb across the remaining length of the property and the accommodation of a new storm sewer system through their property. The storm sewer system is needed to improve the conveyance of drainage from Hackamore Road and will ultimately be connected to a future stormwater treatment system within the development. The additional construction cost to complete concrete curb and ancillary work is Agenda Item: 7h. 2 estimated to be $28,804.00. The cities have agreed to this additional work within the Joint Powers Agreement. Estimated Project Costs & Funding Review The as bid/awarded construction cost was $5,445,445.00 and with the additional work in the amount of $28,804.00, the revised contract amount will then be $5,474,249.00. There will be additional engineering work required with the design changes. The proposed curb extension and revisions to the storm sewer alignment will increase the construction cost, but the additional engineering will not result in an exceedance of the current estimated overhead amount. In addition, within the original total project cost, a 10% contingency had been included and the proposed change order can be accounted for within that amount. Recommended Action A motion to approve Change Order No. 1 for the Hackamore Road Project in the amount of $28,804.00. Original Construction Contract Cost $5,445,445.00 + Additional Curb and ancillary work NE of CR116 $ 28,804.00 Updated Construction Contract (Change Order 1) $5,474,249.00 STATE AID FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION Rev. February 2018 CHANGE ORDER Page 1 of 2 SP/SAP S.A.P. 250-119-001 ; 250-103-002 Minn. Project No. N/A Change Order No. 1 Project Location: Hackamore Road Improvements Project Local Agency: City of Medina; City of Corcoran Local Project No. N/A Contractor: Valley Paving, Inc. Contract No. 020741-000; 20743-000 Contractor Address: 8800 13th Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 Total Change Order Amount: $28,804.00 Description: There are two primary items included in this change order with the following in detail: - An agreement with the contractor to utilize an area offsite for material storage and staging. The staging area is located on the north side of Hackamore Rd roughly 1,000 feet east of CR 116 across two properties owned by Lakeview Development Company, LLC. The cities have an existing agreement with the property owner for the use of the property as a construction staging area and have identified the specific location available for the staging area (see enclosed parcel sketches). The Contractor will be required to adhere to all project specifications related to the maintenance, erosion/sediment control, and restoration in accordance with the specifications in Division 1, section 1806 Storage of Materials. The Contractor will be required to meet City of Corcoran policy and/or ordinances as to the height of stockpiles and duration of storage. A copy of the agreement with the property owner is also enclosed. - The cities of Medina and Corcoran have agreed to a Joint Power Agreement (JPA) where the City of Medina is the lead agency for the project and has entered into a contract for construction with Valley Paving, Inc. as such. Within this JPA, the cities have agreed to additional work including the extension of concrete curb/gutter and various improvements not included with the original project plans as bid. The individual quantity items have already been included in the original project bid; however, the additional work will result in an increase in the contract of the contract amount; a listing of detailed quantities and cost is provided below. Estimate Of Cost: (Include any increases or decreases in contract items, any negotiated or force account items.) Group/Funding Category** Item No. Description Unit Unit Price + or – Quantity + or – Amount $ STATE AID ROADWAY 2101.502 CLEARING EACH $365.00 2.0 $730.00 STATE AID ROADWAY 2101.502 GRUBBING EACH $220.00 2.0 $440.00 STATE AID ROADWAY 2101.505 CLEARING EACH $7,280.00 0.2 $1,456.00 STATE AID ROADWAY 2101.505 GRUBBING EACH $4,160.00 0.2 $832.00 STATE AID ROADWAY 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LF $18.00 630 $11,340.00 STATE AID ROADWAY 2360.504 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX (2,B) 3.0” THICK SY $23.00 220 $5,060.00 STATE AID ROADWAY 2521.518 6” CONCRETE WALK SF $13.30 80 $1,064.00 STATE AID ROADWAY 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SF $52.00 16 $832.00 STATE AID ROADWAY 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH $920.00 1 $920.00 STATE AID ROADWAY 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 LF $735.00 8 $5,880.00 STATE AID ROADWAY 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEAL EACH $250.00 1 $250.00 Net Change This Change Order $28,804.00 **Group/funding category is required for federal aid projects STATE AID FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION Rev. February 2018 CHANGE ORDER Page 2 of 2 Due to this change, the contract time: (check one) ( X ) Is NOT changed ( ) May be revised as provided in MnDOT Specification 1806 Number of Working Days Affected by this Contract Change: Number of Calendar Days Affected by this Contract Change: Approved By Project Engineer: Date: Print Name: Phone: Approved By Contractor: Date: Print Name: Phone: DSAE Portion: The State of Minnesota is not a participant in this contract. Signature by the District State Aid Engineer is for FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY and for compliance with State and Federal Aid Rules/Policy. Eligibility does not guarantee funds will be available. This work is eligible for: ___ Federal Funding ___ State Aid Funding ___ Local funds District State Aid Engineer: Date: DIVISION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 GR - 1 SUMMARY OF WORK ................................................................................................................. 1 GR - 2 WORK SEQUENCE ...................................................................................................................... 1 GR - 3 (1401) INTENT OF CONTRACT................................................................................................... 2 GR - 4 (1402) CONTRACT REVISIONS .................................................................................................. 2 GR - 5 (1403) NOTIFICATION FOR CONTRACT REVISIONS ............................................................... 2 GR - 6 (1404) MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC .......................................................................................... 2 GR - 7 (1405) USE OF MATERIALS FOUND ON THE PROJECT ......................................................... 3 GR - 8 (1406) PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS ................................................................ 3 GR - 9 (1407) FINAL CLEANUP .............................................................................................................. 3 GR - 10 (1408) VALUE ENGINEERING INCENTIVE ................................................................................ 3 GR - 11 (1502) PLANS AND WORKING DRAWINGS ............................................................................... 4 GR - 12 (1504) COORDINATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ........................................................... 5 GR - 13 (1506) SUPERVISION BY CONTRACTOR .................................................................................. 6 GR - 14 (1507) UTILITY PROPERTY AND SERVICE ............................................................................... 6 GR - 15 (1508) CONSTRUCTION STAKES, LINE, AND GRADES .......................................................... 7 GR - 16 (1511) INSPECTION OF WORK .................................................................................................. 8 GR - 17 (1512) UNACCEPTABLE AND UNAUTHORIZED WORK ........................................................... 8 GR - 18 (1513) RESTRICTIONS ON MOVEMENT AND STORAGE OF HEAVY LOADS AND EQUIPMENT ................................................................................................................................. 9 GR - 19 (1514) MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION ................................................................... 9 GR - 20 (1515) CONTROL OF HAUL ROADS .......................................................................................... 9 GR - 21 (1601) SOURCE OF SUPPLY AND QUALITY ............................................................................. 9 GR - 22 (1603) MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS, SAMPLES, TESTS, AND ACCEPTANCE .................. 9 GR - 23 (1606) STORAGE OF MATERIALS ............................................................................................. 9 GR - 24 (1607) HANDLING MATERIALS ................................................................................................ 10 GR - 25 (1608) UNACCEPTABLE MATERIALS ...................................................................................... 10 GR - 26 (1609) DEPARTMENT PROVIDED MATERIAL ......................................................................... 10 GR - 27 (1701) LAWS TO BE OBSERVED ............................................................................................. 10 GR - 28 (1702) PERMITS, LICENSES, AND TAXES .............................................................................. 11 GR - 29 (1705) FEDERAL-AID PROVISIONS ......................................................................................... 11 GR - 30 (1706) EMPLOYEE HEALTH AND WELFARE .......................................................................... 11 GR - 31 (1707) PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND SAFETY ........................................................................ 12 GR - 32 (1708) RAILROAD HIGHWAY PROVISIONS ............................................................................ 12 GR - 33 (1709) NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS ........................................................................................... 12 DIVISION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 GR - 34 (1710) TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ...................................................................................... 12 GR - 35 (1711) USE OF EXPLOSIVES.................................................................................................... 12 GR - 36 (1712) PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF PROPERTY .................................................. 12 GR - 37 (1713) FOREST PROTECTION ................................................................................................. 13 GR - 38 (1716) CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORK ........................................................ 13 GR - 39 (1717) AIR, LAND, AND WATER POLLUTION .......................................................................... 13 GR - 40 (1801) SUBLETTING OF CONTRACT ....................................................................................... 15 GR - 41 (1802) QUALIFICATIONS OF WORKERS ................................................................................. 15 GR - 42 (1804) PROSECUTION OF WORK ............................................................................................ 15 GR - 43 (1805) METHODS AND EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................... 15 GR - 44 (1806) DETERMINATION AND EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME ....................................... 15 GR - 45 (1807) FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON TIME .......................................................... 16 GR - 46 (1901) MEASUREMENT OF QUANTITIES ................................................................................ 16 GR - 47 (1902) SCOPE OF PAYMENT.................................................................................................... 16 GR - 48 (1903) COMPENSATION FOR ALTERED QUANTITIES .......................................................... 17 GR - 49 (1908) FINAL ESTIMATE AND PAYMENT – CONDITIONS AND PROCESS .......................... 17 GR - 50 (1910) COST ESCALATION ....................................................................................................... 18 DIVISION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION These General Requirements amend or supplement Division I of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction (2020 Edition) & the Supplemental Specifications to the 2020 Standard Specifications for Construction. With the exclusion of Definitions and Terms, Bidding Requirements and Conditions, and Bidding Requirements and Covenants, unless specifically stated, provisions of MnDOT Division I which are not amended or supplemented shall not apply to this Contract. This project will be administered by two cities, the City of Medina and the City of Corcoran. GR - 1 SUMMARY OF WORK The Hackamore Road Improvements Project shall include the furnishing of all labor, materials, tools, and equipment necessary to complete the street reconstruction, turn lane improvements, pedestrian improvements, signal work, storm sewer, grading, and appurtenant work as shown on the Plans and specified herein. GR - 2 WORK SEQUENCE The Contractor shall: 1. Perform its work in such a manner as to cause the least interference with adjoining property owners and the general public. 2. For each phase of the project, construct work in a sequence that will allow the utility work to follow immediately upon the removal of the bituminous pavement. Subgrade excavation, subgrade preparation, and placement of aggregate base shall be completed within three weeks of the completion of utility work. Curb and gutter placement, final aggregate base placement, and the first lift of bituminous pavement shall be placed within two weeks of initial aggregate base placement. All restoration work within the boulevard area shall be completed within two weeks of paving the bituminous base course. 3. Limit the area under construction at any given time to minimize the impacts to adjoining properties and limit the duration that activities will disturb residents on each street. The contractor will be limited to a total of twenty (20) weeks leading up to substantial completion to minimize the impacts to the adjacent property owners. 4. Specifically for the proposed improvements at CR 116, including the signal replacement and turn lane expansion, the Contractor shall limit the area under construction to a total of six (6) weeks leading up to substantial completion for this work. The Contractor can begin the work at the intersection concurrently with any phase as identified in the phasing and detour plans. If Hackamore Road is open to traffic, Hennepin County will only allow operation as an all-way stop for no more than two (2) weeks. 5. Limit the area under construction to the area(s) indicated on the phasing plan, unless approved by the Engineer. Under construction is defined as the time period from bituminous removal to placement of the initial aggregate base layer. The contractor shall complete the initial aggregate base placement in each phase, as identified in the phasing plan, prior to moving onto the next phase. The work on CR 116 can occur concurrently with any of the other phases. Prior to removing traffic control along CR 116, bituminous paving must be complete including the wear course. The HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 2 Contractor shall limit the duration of turn lane construction along CR 116 to no more than two (2) weeks from initial bituminous removal to the completion of the bituminous paving. 6. All proposed haul roads must be approved by the Engineer. The Contractor cannot utilize newly paved streets as haul roads. Any damage to existing streets due to unapproved construction use will be repaired at the Contractor’s expense. 7. Concrete curb and gutter and bituminous paving crews shall be mobilized to the project whenever a minimum of one working day, but not more than two working days, are satisfactorily prepared for their respective work. GR - 3 (1401) INTENT OF CONTRACT The provisions of MnDOT 1401 shall apply. GR - 4 (1402) CONTRACT REVISIONS The provisions of MnDOT 1402 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Delete Paragraph 1402.6 in its entirety. GR - 5 (1403) NOTIFICATION FOR CONTRACT REVISIONS The provisions of MnDOT 1403 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Modify the first sentence of MnDOT 1403.6 to read as follows: If the Contractor disagrees with the Engineer’s final written response or the Engineer’s response is untimely, the Contractor may pursue a claim in accordance with the General Conditions, Article 12. GR - 6 (1404) MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC The provisions of MnDOT 1404 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Add the following new paragraph to MnDOT 1404.1: A. Access to Properties The Contractor shall maintain driveway access to the residents at the end of each day. Each resident must be able to drive their vehicle into the driveway. The only exception is the time after the curb and gutter is poured, and after the driveway is restored. The Contractor shall salvage aggregate or recycled bituminous from the project, or haul approved granular/aggregate material to the project site, at no additional cost to the Owner for use in ramping the driveways to maintain access. No additional compensation will be provided for phasing driveway installations (i.e., half of the driveway at one time) or using high-early concrete (curb or driveway paving) to minimize the time in which a driveway is not accessible. The Contractor shall accommodate special access needs of the residents (medical needs, working the night shift, etc.) and provide access to driveways and roadways as required. If access is determined to be unsuitable for individual residences by the Engineer, the Contractor shall make the necessary improvements to reestablish an acceptable access to the property. The Contractor shall notify the Owner at least one week in advance of any daytime road closures or access restrictions. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 3 The Contractor shall schedule or phase work as outlined in these specifications and the construction plans. If a Contractor deems this unreasonable, the Contractor shall submit a written phasing schedule and emergency response plan for inclement weather conditions for Engineer approval. Phasing plans for consideration shall limit the impact of construction to residents. Additional phasing may be required at the time of construction. No additional compensation shall be granted for any phasing changes made to the project. The Contractor shall notify the Owner and travelling public at least one week (7 days) in advance of any daytime road closures or access restrictions. The Contractor shall create and place customized advance notice signs at ends and intersections within the Project area, incidental to the traffic control item. GR - 7 (1405) USE OF MATERIALS FOUND ON THE PROJECT The provisions of MnDOT 1405 shall apply. GR - 8 (1406) PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS The provisions of MnDOT 1406 shall apply. GR - 9 (1407) FINAL CLEANUP The provisions of MnDOT 1407 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: During the progress of the work, the area affected shall be kept clean and free of all rubbish and surplus materials. All unnecessary construction equipment shall be removed from the site and all damage repaired so that the public and adjacent property owners are inconvenienced as little as possible. Where materials or debris have washed, flowed into, or have been placed in water courses, ditches, gutters, drains, catch basins, or elsewhere as a result of the Contractor’s operations, such material or debris shall be removed and satisfactorily disposed of during progress of work. All ditches, channels, drains, etc. shall be kept in a clean and neat condition. On or before the completion of work, the Contractor shall, unless otherwise directed in writing, remove all temporary works, tools and machinery, other construction equipment, or stockpiles placed by the Contractor. The Contractor shall remove all rubbish from any grounds which the Contractor occupied and shall leave all the premises and adjacent properties affected by the operation in a neat and restored condition satisfactory to the Engineer. Street sweeping (with a pickup broom) will be required periodically. Any material deposited on streets adjacent to the project from construction or hauling operations shall be cleaned as directed by the Engineer. If the Contractor fails to clear adjacent roadways within 24 hours of notification, the Engineer shall arrange to have the roadways cleaned by the Owner and bill the Contractor $500 per occurrence. The $500 fee for street sweeping will be deducted from project retainage for each occurrence. GR - 10 (1408) VALUE ENGINEERING INCENTIVE The provision of MnDOT 1408 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: MnDOT 1408 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 1408 VALUE ENGINEERING INCENTIVE Value engineering provisions allow the Contractor to initiate, develop, and present cost reduction Proposals involving changes in the Contract requirements to the Owner for consideration. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 4 Value engineering provisions only apply if the Contractor specifically submits a Proposal for consideration as a value engineering Proposal. The cost reduction Proposals shall produce a net savings to the Contract by providing less costly items or methods than those specified in the Contract without impairing essential functions and characteristics. The Contractor shall submit value engineering Proposals to the Engineer with the following information: (1) A statement that the Contractor is submitting a value engineering Proposal (2) A description of the Proposal (3) An itemization of the proposed changes to the Contract requirements and a recommendation of how to make each change (4) An estimate of the reduction in performance costs that will result from adoption of the Proposal (5) A prediction of any effect the proposed changes would have on other costs incurred by the Owner (6) A statement of the time by which an agreement for adoption of the Proposal must be executed to obtain the maximum cost reduction during the remainder of the Contract, and the reasoning for this time schedule (7) The dates of any previous submissions of the Proposal, including project Owner’s name, contact information, and actions taken (8) A statement as to the effect the Proposal would have on the time for completion of the Contract The Owner will not assume any liability for not meeting the statement of the time described in the Contractor’s value engineering Proposal. The Contractor may withdraw, in whole or in part, any value engineering Proposal not accepted by the Owner within the period identified in the proposal. The Owner’s acceptance or rejection decision on a value engineering Proposal shall be final and the provisions of the General Conditions, Article 12 will not apply. The Owner will notify the Contractor in writing of its decision regarding each value engineering Proposal. Until the Owner accepts the Proposal, the Contractor shall continue to perform Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract. If the Owner accepts the Proposal, the Owner will execute a Change Order setting forth the terms, conditions, and costs of the Proposal. If the Contractor performs any Work performed in accordance with the value engineering Proposal before the execution of the Change Order, the Department will consider that “unauthorized Work” as specified in MnDOT 1512 as modified herein. The Owner reserves the right to reject any value engineering Proposal. The Owner will not provide an incentive payment to the Contractor as a result of any net savings from the value engineering Proposal. The Owner may include conditions for consideration, approval, and implementation of the cost reduction Proposal in the Change Order. The Contractor shall design and develop the Proposal at no additional cost to the Owner. After the Owner accepts the cost reduction Proposal, any restrictions imposed by the Contractor on its use or disclosure of the information submitted shall be void, and the Owner will have the right to use, duplicate, and disclose any data necessary to use the Proposal. GR - 11 (1502) PLANS AND WORKING DRAWINGS The provisions of MnDOT 1502 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 5 Drawings provided by the Owner will include the information, as applicable to the project, in accordance with MnDOT 1502. The Owner’s Standard Plates, MnDOT’s Standard Plates, and MnDOT’s Standard Plans may provide supplemental information. GR - 12 (1504) COORDINATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The provisions of MnDOT 1504 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Delete the second sentence of the first paragraph of MnDOT 1504 and replace with the following: HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 6 If discrepancies exist between the Contract documents, the following order of precedence applies: 1. Addenda, 2. Project Manual, 3. Project Plans, 4. Owner’s General Specifications and Standard Plates (if applicable), 5. MnDOT Standard Specifications for Construction, and 6. CEAM Standard Specifications. GR - 13 (1506) SUPERVISION BY CONTRACTOR The provisions of MnDOT 1506 shall apply. GR - 14 (1507) UTILITY PROPERTY AND SERVICE The provisions of MnDOT 1507 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: The plans show only known underground utilities, public and private, and the locations are approximate. No assurance is given that additional underground facilities do not exist. The utilities are classified as “Level D” unless the plans specifically state otherwise. This utility quality level was determined according to the guidelines of CI/ASCE 38-02, entitled “Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Data”. State law requires the Contractor to contact Gopher State One Call (811) for utility locations before doing any underground excavation. The Contractor is responsible for ascertaining the actual location of underground utilities. The following utility owners are known to have existing facilities that may be affected by the Work: CENTERPOINT ENERGY Paul Jacks 612-321-5077 paul.jacks@centerpointenergy.com MEDIACOM Thomas Heimel Thomas.heimel@mediacomcc.com XCEL ENERGY John Pfotenhauer 763-493-1876 John.f.pfotenhauer@xcelenergy.com CENTURYLINK RJ Allison (Terra Tech) 612-388--7375 rallison@terratechllc.net WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP Bob Fenner 612-751-6989 Bfenner@whe.org ARVIG Brian Wochnick 218-298-4951 metrosop@arvig.com COMCAST McClay Lyford 651-925-6372 mcclay_lyford@comcast.com HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 7 CITY OF MEDINA Steve Scherer 763-473-8842 steve.scherer@ci.medina.mn.us CITY OF CORCORAN Kevin Mattson 612-710-0705 kmattson@corcoranmn.gov HENNEPIN COUNTY Brant Kough 612-596-0339 brant.kough@hennepin.us All bidders are responsible for contacting the affected utilities prior to submitting the bid to determine the extent of their facilities within the project area and the scope and anticipated schedule of the facility relocation, removal, or adjustment. The Xcel overhead lines/poles on the south side of Hackamore Road will require relocation. Other utility owners such as CenterPoint Energy, Mediacom, Century Link, Wright Hennepin Coop, Arvig, Zayo, and Comcast are planning a joint trench project on the north side of Hackamore Road. Prior to commencing construction, the Contractor shall check all existing manholes, catch basins, gate valve boxes, stop boxes, culverts, and storm sewer lines in the construction zones to determine their condition. Failure to report deficiencies in writing, and have such deficiencies acknowledged in writing by the Engineer, will be cause for any required repairs and/or cleaning to be charged to this Contractor. The Contractor shall coordinate schedules with the work schedules of the utility owners present within the project limits to avoid delays. The location, protection, maintenance and/or repair, if damaged, of all in- place utilities shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. The Contractor must provide a safe Work place for personnel and the utilities, including the payment of any fee charged by the utility for preparing a safe Work area for the Contractor. Where construction operations require the interruption of service of a utility, the Contractor shall notify the utility at least 48 hours before the interruption and shall advise the utility of the probable time when the service will be restored. GR - 15 (1508) CONSTRUCTION STAKES, LINE, AND GRADES MnDOT 1508 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 1508 CONSTRUCTION STAKES, LINE AND GRADES The Contractor shall furnish sufficient staking supplies to adequately stake the requirements of the project; these supplies specifically being 1”x2”x8” wood hubs and 36” pointed wood lath. The Engineer will pick up and provide storage for the supplies throughout the life of the contract. The Contractor shall compensate for the supplies through a store charge account at Engineer’s preferred vendor; Contractor shall confirm with Engineer prior to project start for preferred vendor locations. Contractor will have charge account established prior to the Notice to Proceed being issued. Charge Account estimates for this project is $3500.00. The Engineer will provide horizontal and vertical control construction staking as follows: 1. Offset stakes placed at 25-foot intervals for the first 100 feet out of each manhole, then 100- foot intervals thereafter for sanitary or storm sewer, with a cut sheet indicating horizontal and vertical distances from the stake to the pipe invert. 2. Offset stakes placed at 50-foot intervals, including changes in direction and appurtenances for watermain construction. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 8 3. Curb and Gutter: 3-foot offset stakes placed at 25-foot intervals with a cut sheet indicating a cut/fill to the proposed top of curb. 4. Reference hubs (blue tops) at approximately 100-foot intervals at a measured distance either side of centerline, including cut or fill instructions for subgrade and/or gravel base. Construction stakes will not be placed by the Owner until a written request is received from the Contractor giving the Engineer 48 hours’ notice, describing where and when the Contractor wants the construction stakes placed for the next week's construction. The Contractor shall preserve all stakes and marks. If the Contractor carelessly or willfully destroys or disturbs any of the field control states or marks, the Engineer will deduct the Owner’s cost for replacing the damaged stakes or marks from the payment for the Work. The Engineer shall have the right to order the Contractor to have construction stakes replaced if the Engineer determines that a significant number of stakes have been destroyed. The Contractor shall not rely solely upon the construction stakes and shall fully review the Contract Documents along with the construction stakes. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer of any discrepancies between the Contract Documents and the construction stakes. The Contractor shall not knowingly take advantage of any such discrepancies. The Contractor is fully responsible for all measurements made from any offset construction stake or measurements made from any stakes and marks established by the Engineer. No additional compensation shall be allowed the Contractor for any claims of crews being held up because of lack of line and grade stakes. GR - 16 (1511) INSPECTION OF WORK The provisions of MnDOT 1511 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Any person representing Federal or State agencies, the Engineer, or Owner shall have the right of entry to inspect the Work being performed by the Contractor. If the case warrants, the Contractor shall provide proper facilities for such access and inspection. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer anytime they anticipate working on this project. No work will be allowed without notifying the Engineer a minimum of 24 hours beforehand. GR - 17 (1512) UNACCEPTABLE AND UNAUTHORIZED WORK The provisions of MnDOT 1512 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: MnDOT 1512.1 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 1512.1 UNACCEPTABLE WORK The Owner will consider all Work and Materials that do not meet the Contract requirements, or do not meet generally accepted industry standards if the Contract does not provide specific standards, to be unacceptable. Unacceptable Work resulting from poor workmanship, use of nonconforming Materials, damage through carelessness, or any other cause existing before final acceptance of the Work shall be handled in the same manner as Defective Work, in accordance with Article 14 of the General Conditions. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 9 GR - 18 (1513) RESTRICTIONS ON MOVEMENT AND STORAGE OF HEAVY LOADS AND EQUIPMENT The provisions of MnDOT 1513 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: The Contractor shall limit the roadways utilized for delivery of equipment and for hauling operations. The Contractor shall provide and use only rubber tire dozers, front end loaders, and other necessary equipment on all work where street pavements or portions of pavements are undisturbed for the protection of the pavements or in such locations as the Engineer may direct. No compensation will be allowed to the Contractor for replacement of damaged utilities and resurfacing or replacing damaged pavements. GR - 19 (1514) MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION The provisions of MnDOT 1514 shall apply. GR - 20 (1515) CONTROL OF HAUL ROADS The provisions of MnDOT 1515 shall apply. GR - 21 (1601) SOURCE OF SUPPLY AND QUALITY The provisions of MnDOT 1601 shall apply. GR - 22 (1603) MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS, SAMPLES, TESTS, AND ACCEPTANCE The provisions of MnDOT 1603 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Delete the last sentence of the first paragraph of MnDOT 1603.2 and replace with the following: MnDOT’s 2022 SALT Schedule of Materials Control – Local Government Agency will be followed on this project. Initial testing of materials and/or densities, in accordance with the requirements below, will be paid for by the Owner. Any retesting due to failures shall be at the expense of the Contractor. The schedule of Materials Control is available online: https://edocs- public.dot.state.mn.us/edocs_public/DMResultSet/download?docId=19624483. Add the following new paragraph to MnDOT 1603.2: Copies of all test results, either passing or failing, shall be provided to the Observer, Owner, and Engineer. Failing test results shall be retested to confirm compliance with the project specifications. GR - 23 (1606) STORAGE OF MATERIALS The provisions of MnDOT 1606 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: The Contractor may have the opportunity to utilize property along the Hackamore Road corridor for staging and storage of materials, specifically the property located on the north side of Hackamore Road roughly 1,000 feet east of CR 116. The property is owned by Lakeview Development Company, LLC and the Contractor must work directly with the owner to secure access and an agreement for use. The Contractor is responsible for erosion control, restoration, and returning the property to a like condition prior to use, incidental to the project. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 10 Any disturbed area shall be cleaned up and fully restored to the pre-existing condition prior to closing out this project. The Contractor shall be required to install protective fencing and silt fence around the storage area. The protection, cleanup, and restoration of the project storage area shall be the Contractor’s responsibility; no compensation will be made for this work. It is anticipated that all work, including stockpiling of materials, will be completed within the roadway right-of-way. GR - 24 (1607) HANDLING MATERIALS The provisions of MnDOT 1607 shall apply. GR - 25 (1608) UNACCEPTABLE MATERIALS The provisions of MnDOT 1608 shall apply. GR - 26 (1609) DEPARTMENT PROVIDED MATERIAL The provisions of MnDOT 1609 shall apply. GR - 27 (1701) LAWS TO BE OBSERVED The provisions of MnDOT 1701 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: The Contractor shall not discriminate against prospective employees because of age, race, color, sex, creed, religion, nationality, or disability. Delete MnDOT 1701.2 in its entirety and replace with the following: 1701.2 WORKER CONDUCT The Owner intends to provide a workplace free of violence, threats of violence, harassment, and discrimination. The Owner has zero tolerance for violence in the workplace. Contractors shall maintain a workplace free of violence, harassment, and discrimination. The Contractor must immediately remove from the Project any employee of the Contractor or a Subcontractor in violation of these requirements. Delete MnDOT 1701.3 in its entirety. Delete MnDOT 1701.5 in its entirety and replace with the following: 1701.5 PROMPT PAYMENT AND RETAINAGE A. Prompt payment of Subcontractors is required by MINN. STAT. 471.425. The Contractor must pay a Subcontractor no later than ten days after receiving payment from the Owner for undisputed Work provided by that Subcontractor. If the Contractor fails to pay a Subcontractor on time, then the Contractor must pay interest, at the rate of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month, to the Subcontractor on the undisputed amount not paid on time. For an unpaid amount under $100, the Contractor must pay the actual interest penalty (calculated at 1.5 percent per month) or $10, whichever is greater. MINN. STAT. 471.425, subdivision 4a. also provides that a Subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from a prime Contractor must be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney’s fees, incurred in bringing the action. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 11 B. Payment of retainage is governed by MINN. STAT. 337.10, and 15.72. The Contractor may not withhold more than 5 percent in retainage from a Subcontractor, as provided by MINN. STAT. 337.10 subdivision 4(b). The Contractor must pay any retainage no later than 10 Calendar Days after the Contractor receives payment of retainage from the Owner, unless there is a dispute about the Work under a subcontract. If there is a dispute about the Work under a subcontract, the Contractor must pay out retainage to any Subcontractor whose Work is not involved in the dispute and must provide a written statement detailing the amount and reason for the withholding to the affected Subcontractor. GR - 28 (1702) PERMITS, LICENSES, AND TAXES The provisions of MnDOT 1702 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: The following permits will be acquired by the Owner (except as noted). The Contractor is required to follow the provisions of all permits: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA): This Contract requires a Construction Stormwater General Permit (CSG Permit) administered by the MPCA. The Contractor shall become a co-permittee with the Owner to ensure compliance with the State of Minnesota Construction Stormwater General Permit (MNR100001), which is part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and the State Disposal System (SDS) Program. This permit establishes conditions for discharging storm water to waters of the State from construction activity disturbing one or more acres of total land area. By completing the online CSG Permit application, the Contractor must ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit that reference the “operator.” The Contractor shall cooperate with the Owner to implement a fully-documented inspection and maintenance program for all temporary erosion and sediment control measures as required by the Permit. Hennepin County: A Right-of-Way Permit for work within County right-of-way (County Highway 116 & 101) will be required. The permit shall be obtained by the Owner. The Contractor is responsible for registering with Hennepin County and following permit requirements. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR): The Contractor shall acquire a DNR Water Appropriations permit if any dewatering becomes necessary. GR - 29 (1705) FEDERAL-AID PROVISIONS The provisions of MnDOT 1705 shall apply only for Federally funded projects. GR - 30 (1706) EMPLOYEE HEALTH AND WELFARE The provisions of MnDOT 1706 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: The Contractor, at their own expense, shall provide and maintain temporary toilet facilities at the site during the construction period sufficient for the scheduled workforce. The Contractor and Engineer shall agree to the location of the temporary toilet facilities. The Contractor must not use motor vehicle Equipment that has an obstructed rear view unless the vehicle has a reverse alarm that is audible above the surrounding noise level; or an observer signals to the operator that it is safe to reverse. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 12 Areas of special concern include, but are not limited to, excavation stability protection, fall protection, protection from overhead hazards, vehicle backup protection, confined space safety, blasting operations, and personal safety devices. GR - 31 (1707) PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND SAFETY The provisions of MnDOT 1707 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Regular working hours will be from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday; and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. The Contractor shall not be permitted to work on Sundays or holidays, except in the case of emergencies. Requests for modification of working hours must be approved by the Owner. The Contractor shall submit all requests in writing to the Engineer. The Contractor shall structure the proposed project schedule based on the stated working hours. The Contractor shall comply with local and state ordinances on noise abatement. All equipment shall have effective mufflers on engine exhaust systems. The Contractor shall be required to accommodate garbage collection while the project is under construction. Coordination shall include contact with the garbage companies service the area and maintaining access to the individual residences. If the Contractor fails to accommodate garbage collection, the Contractor shall contract independently to have the garbage removed at no cost to the Owner. The Contractor shall provide any barricades, fences or other means of protection necessary to properly execute the work and adequately protect its employees, employees of the Owner, employees of the Engineer, and members of the public according to federal, state, and local regulators. All utility trenches shall be backfilled at the end of each working day to the satisfaction of the Engineer. All labor and materials necessary to comply with these provisions are incidental, and no payment shall be made. The Contractor shall ensure that employees and Subcontractors do not display items such as, but not limited to, flags, banners, and symbols on the Project Site, that may disrupt the proper prosecution of the Work, impede public safety, or create a distraction for the traveling public. GR - 32 (1708) RAILROAD HIGHWAY PROVISIONS The provisions of MnDOT 1708 shall apply. GR - 33 (1709) NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS The provisions of MnDOT 1709 shall apply. GR - 34 (1710) TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES The provisions of MnDOT 1710 shall apply. GR - 35 (1711) USE OF EXPLOSIVES The provisions of MnDOT 1711 shall apply. GR - 36 (1712) PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF PROPERTY The provisions of MnDOT 1712 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 13 The Contractor shall protect, and/or remove and reinstall all fences, street signs, retaining walls, and other items required to construct the proposed improvements. Work associated with protecting, and/or removing and reinstalling fences, street signs, lawn irrigation systems, and other items shall be considered incidental to the project unless specific bid items are included. The Contractor shall take whatever steps necessary to protect adjoining properties and structures from hazards due to performance of the work. The Contractor is responsible for any and all damage to properties and structures that occur as a result of the Contractor’s operations. The street and utility construction may occur in close proximity to a number of existing structures. The Contractor shall use shoring or other means as necessary to ensure that those structures are protected during construction. Existing residences may not be of modern construction and are thus sensitive to vibrating equipment. The Contractor shall take care when utilizing vibratory equipment to avoid damage to adjoining structures. Damage to structures resulting from the use of vibratory equipment are the responsibility of the Contractor. In the event of a complaint or perceived problem, a seismograph will be required to be provided at the Contractor’s expense. All labor and materials necessary to comply with the provisions of this section are incidental, and no payment shall be made. Delete Paragraph MnDOT 1712.1.A in its entirety and replace with the following: A. Monuments The Contractor shall preserve all land and property corner monuments, Right-of-way monuments, and vertical and horizontal control point monuments in the vicinity of the Work. The Owner will mark all such monuments the Owner is aware of prior to construction. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer of any monument, whether the Owner has marked them or not, which the Contractor may disturb, in sufficient time to allow the Engineer to establish ties to the corner. The replacement of monuments removed by the Contractor shall be completed by the Owner at the Contractor's expense. GR - 37 (1713) FOREST PROTECTION The provisions of MnDOT 1713 shall apply. GR - 38 (1716) CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORK The provisions of MnDOT 1716 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: The Contractor shall guarantee and maintain the stability of all work, equipment and materials for a period of two years from the date of Notice of Acceptability of Work. The Contractor shall provide as part of the contract security a separate two-year maintenance bond to be dated to begin the date of Notice of Acceptability of Work. The provisions of this paragraph shall not be construed as restricting Contractor's liability for breach of contract by reason of non-conformance with the specification for defects or faulty workmanship. GR - 39 (1717) AIR, LAND, AND WATER POLLUTION The provisions of MnDOT 1717 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Pollution of natural resources of air, land, and water by operations under this Contract shall be prevented, controlled, and abated in accordance with the rules, regulations, and standards adopted and established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and MnDOT 1717, 2573 and 2575. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 14 Add the following requirements to MnDOT 1717.1.D: The Contractor shall be responsible for dust control. Water for construction purposes may be obtained from the City of Medina at 600 Clydesdale Trail (City Public Works Building). The Contractor shall make suitable arrangements with the Public Works Department for the location where water may be obtained. The City will not charge for reasonable amounts of water used for dust control or turf establishment if the Contractor fills at the City’s public works garage but reserves the right to charge the cost of any water which is used over these requirements, such cost to be charged against the project. Contact the Director of Public Works for current water rates; no deposit will be required to obtain a meter. The City must be notified forty-eight (48) hours in advance of any water usage. Add the following requirements to MnDOT 1717.2: D. MPCA Construction Storm Water Permit By signing the Proposal and completing the electronic online NPDES CSW permit, the Contractor is a co-permittee with the Owner and must ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the Construction General Storm Water Permit (MN R100001). The Contractor is responsible for those portions of the permit referencing the “operator”. This permit establishes conditions for discharging storm water to waters of the State from construction activities that disturb one acre or more of total land area. A copy of the permit is available at https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/construction-stormwater, or by calling (651) 296-3890. The Owner will apply and pay for the NPDES Permit on this Project. The Contractor is not authorized to perform any Project Work which disturbs soil or which involves Work in waters of the State until the Permit is in effect and the Owner has received the required documentation. Contractor must provide an Erosion Control Supervisor as per MnDOT 2573.3. The Contractor is solely responsible for all inspections, maintenance, and records required in Section 11 of the General Permit. Immediately notify the Engineer of site visits by Local Permitting Authorities performed in accordance with Section 24.10 of the Permit. The Contractor must obtain the Engineer’s approval before starting any Work required by regulatory authorities which (1) the Contractor believes will result in additional compensation from the Owner; or (2) will impact the design or requirements of the Contract documents or impact traffic. The Contractor must use Best Management Practices to help minimize turbidity of surface waters and relieve runoff from extreme weather events. The Contractor must report a stormwater sediment release from the Project Site to the Minnesota Duty Office (1-800-422-0798) at the time the Contractor or Owner discovers the release. The Contractor must also immediately contact the Minnesota Duty Officer during any emergency situation involving an uncontrolled stormwater release. Erosion control shall be placed and maintained by the Contractor as directed by the Engineer. The Contractor shall use the appropriate means of control for individual situations. The erosion control types may include but are not limited to silt fence, fiber blanket, rock construction entrances, diversion ditches, and catch basin inlet protection, all of which will be considered incidental to the project cost unless a bid item is provided in the Bid Form. Failure to maintain the erosion control will be sufficient cause to withhold further payments on the project until the maintenance is complete. The erosion control measures for the project have been identified in the plan set and the NPDES Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP); however, modifications can be made depending on actual site conditions. Emergency Best Management Practices must be enacted to help minimize turbidity of surface waters and relieve runoff from extreme weather events. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 15 Prior to final acceptance of the project or the end of the warranty period, as applicable, the Contractor shall remove all erosion control items. GR - 40 (1801) SUBLETTING OF CONTRACT The provisions of MnDOT 1801 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Modify the first sentence of the second to the last paragraph of MnDOT 1801 to read as follows: The Contractor must ensure that the subcontracts at least contain the following (if required by the Contract): GR - 41 (1802) QUALIFICATIONS OF WORKERS The provisions of MnDOT 1802 shall apply. GR - 42 (1804) PROSECUTION OF WORK The provisions of MnDOT 1804 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Delete the first sentence of the first paragraph of MnDOT 1804.1. Delete the third and fourth paragraphs of MnDOT 1804.1 and replace with the following: Should the Contractor fail to maintain satisfactory progress, the Engineer will require that the Contractor provide additional resources (e.g., labor, Materials, Equipment) as necessary to bring the Work up to the level of progress required in the current accepted Progress Schedule to ensure completion of the Work within the time(s) specified in the Contract. GR - 43 (1805) METHODS AND EQUIPMENT The provisions of MnDOT 1805 shall apply. GR - 44 (1806) DETERMINATION AND EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME The provisions of MnDOT 1806.1 are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following: 1806.1 GENERAL The Contractor shall prosecute the Work continuously and effectively, with the least possible delay, to the end that all Work is completed within the Contract Time. If the Owner grants an extension of the Contract Time, the extended time for completion will be in full force and effect as thought it was originally specified. The Notice to Proceed is anticipated to be issued by the Owner in June 2023. The exact date of issuance will be determined based on the Contractor’s schedule. Construction shall start within seven days of receiving the Notice to Proceed. Limit the area under construction to a total of twenty (20) weeks leading up to substantial completion. The Work will be substantially completed on or before November 3, 2023. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 16 Substantial completion includes storm sewer installation, placement of the base course(s) of bituminous pavement (Hackamore Road), sidewalk, pedestrian ramps, driveway/trail pavement, signage, temporary striping (Hackamore Road), initial placement of sod/seeding, restoration, and cleanup. Substantial completion as it pertains to the work along CR 116 shall also include the signal system installation, full depth paving, and final striping. Initial placement of sod (or other turf establishment products if applicable) shall occur by the substantial completion date, but the required maintenance may extend beyond that date in accordance with the plans and specifications. The final lift of bituminous cannot be placed on Hackamore Road until after one freeze-thaw cycle, but shall be placed before June 14, 2024, unless specifically directed by the Engineer. The Work will be ready for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 15.06 of the General Conditions on or before June 28, 2024. Final completion includes full turf establishment (completion of maintenance period and acceptance by City), final striping, resolving all punch list items, and any remaining cleanup. The project schedule has been set to accommodate sufficient time for private utility relocation and weather delays. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to complete the project within the assigned schedule. No extension of time will be granted for weather conditions typical to the time of year the work is undertaken. Provide 48-hour notice prior to installing traffic control signs. The Contractor shall schedule work to occur continuously to avoid delays. The Contractor shall coordinate schedules with all utility owners within the project limits. Delete MnDOT 1806.2 in its entirety. GR - 45 (1807) FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON TIME The provisions of MnDOT 1807 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: Contractor and Owner recognize that time is of the essence and that the Owner will suffer financial loss and other losses if the work is not completed within the times specified by the Owner, plus any extensions thereof allowed in accordance with the Contract. The parties also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal or arbitration preceding the actual loss suffered by Owner if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, Owner and Contractor agree that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty) Contractor shall pay the Owner as follows: • The liquidated damages shall be in accordance with Table 1807-1 Schedule of Liquidated Damages for all stated completion dates, as well as any intermediate completion dates. Liquidated damages will accrue during the period beginning November 6, 2023 and continuing until the bituminous base course, temporary striping, and signage has been placed according to the stipulated schedule for substantial and final completion. In the spring of 2024, liquidated damages will accrue during the period from July 1, 2024 on, if the bituminous wear course and final striping has not been placed according to the stipulated scheduled final completion. GR - 46 (1901) MEASUREMENT OF QUANTITIES The provisions of MnDOT 1901 shall apply. GR - 47 (1902) SCOPE OF PAYMENT The provisions of MnDOT 1902 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 17 Modify the second sentence of MnDOT 1902 to read as follows: This includes compensation for all risk, loss, damage, and expense incurred by the Contractor for performing the Work required by the Contract subject to the General Conditions. GR - 48 (1903) COMPENSATION FOR ALTERED QUANTITIES The provisions of MnDOT 1903 are modified and/or supplemented with the following: The Owner reserves the right to reduce certain quantities or delete certain items from each section of the bids as the Owner sees fit, either before or after the Award of Contract. There will be no additional compensation due to remobilization of equipment as necessary to complete punch list items or other items not completed by the Contractor. There will be no additional compensation due to restocking charges for materials not used on the project. GR - 49 (1908) FINAL ESTIMATE AND PAYMENT – CONDITIONS AND PROCESS MnDOT 1908 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 1908 FINAL ESTIMATE AND PAYMENT – CONDITIONS AND PROCESS Absent complete and legally effective releases or waivers of all Lien rights arising out of the Work, and of Liens filed in connection with the Work, the Owner may retain out of any monies due said Contractor sums sufficient to cover all unpaid liens/claims. The Owner cannot make final payment to the Contractor until the Contractor demonstrates that it and all its Subcontractors have complied with the Income Tax withholding requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 290.92 for wages paid for Work performed under the Contract. To establish compliance, the Contractor must submit a “Contractor Affidavit” either online or in paper form (IC134) to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. The Contractor will receive written certification of compliance when the Department of Revenue determines that all withholding tax returns have been filed and all withholding taxes attributable to the Work performed on the Contract have been paid. The Contractor must then provide this written certification to the Owner to receive final payment. Every Subcontractor working on the Project must submit an approved “Contractor Affidavit” from the Minnesota Department of Revenue to the Contractor before the Contractor can file its own Contractor Affidavit. The Contractor is advised to obtain the certification from each Subcontractor as soon as the Subcontractor completes Work on the Project. Experience has shown that waiting until the Project is complete to obtain the forms from all Subcontractors is likely to result in significant additional Work for the Contractor as it will be difficult or impossible to collect all forms. The Department of Revenue, in association with the Department of Employment and Economic Development, offers a free seminar to help contractors understand tax law requirements. The Department strongly urges the Contractor and all Subcontractors to attend the “Employment Taxes & Employer Responsibilities Seminar” or similarly offered classes. You can find a schedule and more information on the Department’s website at: https://www.revenue.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/2022- 12/employment%20taxes%20seminar%20flyer_22.pdf. Complying with this requirement is considered part of the Work under this Contract. The Department will enforce this requirement equally with all other Contract requirements. Contractor delay in complying with this requirement will cause the Department to delay final payment and Contract Acceptance. The Department may also report non-compliance to the Department of Revenue, which may result in enforcement action by the Department of Revenue. HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DIVISION 1 SAP 250-103-002 & SAP 215-119-001 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJ. NO. 2183552 CITIES OF MEDINA & CORCORAN, MN WSB PROJECT NOS. 020741-000 & 020743-000 PAGE 18 Contractor Affidavit requirements and Form IC134 can be found here: https://www.revenue.state.mn.us/contractor-affidavit-requirements. GR - 50 (1910) COST ESCALATION The provisions of MnDOT 1910 shall apply. Page 1 of 10 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7i. City Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Natalie Davis McKeown Topic: Heidecker Garage CUP Conditional Home Occupation License IUP (PID 22-119-23-42-0009) (City File No. 23-009) Action Required: Approval 1. Application Request Tyler Heidecker, the applicant, requests approval of an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for a Conditional Home Occupation License (CHOL) and a conditional use permit to exceed building sidewall height for his property at 7985 Eagle Ridge Rd. He will build the new accessory building for the primary purpose of storing materials related to his home remodeling business. There will be times where the structure will be used for woodworking activities (e.g., cabinet making) related to the business. 2. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item on July 6, 2023. No public comments were received. The Commission unanimously (5-0) recommended approval with removal of the condition that the building plans needed to be updated to label the building materials as this information was provided in an alternative format by the applicant. 3. Context Zoning and Land Use The proposed property is guided for existing residential and zoned UR (Urban Reserve). The property has an existing single-family home with an attached garage. The property is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and Phase 4 of the 2040 Staging Plan. Surrounding Properties Figure 1 Site Location Page 2 of 10 The guiding, zoning, and existing use of the surrounding properties are detailed in the table below. All surrounding properties are within the MUSA. Direction Guided Zoning District Use Staging Phase North Low Density Residential UR Agriculture Phase 4 East Low Density Residential UR Agriculture Phase 4 South Low Density Residential UR Agriculture Phase 4 West Existing Residential UR Residential Phase 4 Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2040 Comprehensive Plan’s Natural Resource Inventory Areas map shows a Reed Canary Dominant Flood Plain along the rear property line that follows a stream in the area. The natural community is not indicated high-quality on the map. The property contains a portion of a larger wetland complex in the rear yard, but it was determined the proposed location of the structure will not affect this larger complex. A partial wetland delineation was completed for the proposed project area in the front yard of the property. It was determined there is an incidental wetland (i.e., roadside ditch) in the southwest corner of the study area. Due to the incidental nature, this area would not be subject to wetland regulations. 4. Analysis Planning staff coordinated review of the request for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, City Code requirements, and City policies. The Figure 2 Natural Resource Inventory Areas Page 3 of 10 City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. The City’s discretion in approving or denying an IUP or CUP is limited to whether the proposed request meets the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the permit(s). I. Accessory Structure CUP The applicant proposes to construct a detached garage of 1,770 square feet within their front yard on a 2.9-acre parcel. This is a revision to the original request for a building of 1,750 square feet. The site plan has not yet been updated to reflect the new footprint, but the applicant did submit revised building plans prior to the public hearing. A condition of approval in the resolution is for the site plan and grading plan to be updated to reflect the revised building footprint. Figure 3 Site Plan Page 4 of 10 Location and Setbacks The structure is proposed to be placed in the front yard. This is allowed in the UR district. The structure exceeds the 10’ minimum separation from the residence. The structure is closest to the front property line to the south where a 50’ setback is required. The structure meets the front setback requirement and far exceeds the side and rear setbacks (20’ and 15’ respectively). Size Section 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance allows an accessory building footprint of 1,781 square feet for a lot of this size. There is a temporary structure on the property that is currently being used to store materials and equipment. Temporary structures are not permitted by City Code. There is a condition of approval that the temporary structure be removed. The applicant would still be allowed one additional detached structure not to exceed 200 square feet, but no other structures will be approved as it would most likely exceed the allowed footprint. Building Height The building is located in the front yard and is limited to a maximum sidewall height of 10’. To accommodate the garage door necessary to fit the applicant’s work equipment, a sidewall height of 13.85’ is proposed for the garage which can be granted through a CUP. The building does not exceed the 35’ height limit for the district. Figure 4 Front Building Elevation Page 5 of 10 Architectural Standards The building plans show two dormers on the west elevation of the roof. These are intended to provide interest to the building and light to the storage space on the upper level of the structure. The revised building plans show an exterior staircase for external access to the storage space on the second level. The building plans indicate the use of LP siding and trim, and the applicant confirmed his intention to use upgraded asphalt/architectural shingles. The color scheme of the siding and roof will utilize neutral brown tones. The Zoning Ordinance requires eaves (i.e., the underside or soffits on the side) of at least 12” and overhangs (i.e., the edge extending over the front and rear elevations) of at least 24”. The plans show eaves and overhangs of 24”. This standard is satisfied. Grading and Drainage The Engineering Memo notes that the current grading plans appears to block drainage from Eagle Ridge Road. This will need to be corrected to allow flow from an Eagle Ridge Road. This may require a culvert. A condition of approval is for the plans to be revised for review and approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, the grading and drainage details must be revised to reflect the new requested footprint of 1,770 square feet. This is addressed as a condition of approval in the resolution. Conditional Use Permit Standards The applicant requests a CUP to exceed the maximum sidewall height as allowed by Section 1030.020, Subd. 5(D). This provision in City Code allows any building to exceed the allowable building height with a CUP. In order to grant a CUP, the following standards must be met: 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. The proposed use is generally in conformance with the City regulations. The building meets setbacks, footprint, and architectural requirements. The taller building sidewall is required to accommodate the applicant’s business equipment. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites, and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. The applicant submitted a certificate of survey and site plan that show the required features. The site plan must be updated to reflect the revised footprint of 1,770 square feet which is handled as a condition of approval. Page 6 of 10 3. Applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance. Staff finds that the taller building height would comply with the standards as follows: a. Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed taller building would have no impact on the Comprehensive Plan. b. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort. The CUP for the taller building would not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort of the surrounding neighborhood. The building would be below the 35’ maximum building height allowed for principal buildings in this district. The building would meet or exceed all setback requirements for the district. c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. Assuming the recommended conditions of approval are adopted, staff does not find reason to believe the CUP for the taller building would be injurious to the use and enjoyment of the surrounding properties for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed building is below the 35’ maximum building height allowed for principal buildings in this district and meets or exceeds all required setbacks. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. The surrounding properties are used for a mix of residential and agricultural uses. The proposed building does not preclude improvement or further development of the surrounding properties. e. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Page 7 of 10 Adequate public facilities are available to accommodate the proposed use. The taller building will not impact the demand for services. f. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. If the CUP and IUP are approved with the conditions of approval as recommended by staff, the use will comply with the UR district regulations. g. The conditional use and site conform to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. The bonus room shown on the 2nd floor of the plans could be used as living space, but the structure has not been reviewed against the accessory dwelling unit (ADU) performance standards. For this reason, a condition of approval is included in the draft resolution prohibiting the use of this space as living space unless an ADU administrative permit is requested and granted. The applicant shared his intent is to use this space is for storage of materials and occasional woodworking. If the CUP and IUP are approved with the conditions of approval as recommended by staff, the use will comply with all applicable performance standards for accessory structures. 4. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. As noted previously, the building plans indicate the use of LP siding, and the applicant provided in writing his intention to use upgraded asphalt shingles. These materials comply with the building materials allowed for accessory structures on properties greater than 2 acres. The Council could require that the plans be formally updated to reflect the final roofing materials. However, the Planning Commission was comfortable with the information already provided and recommended removal of this as a condition. The resolution reflects the Planning Commission’s recommendation. 5. The proposed building will be compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed use is generally in conformance with the City regulations. Conditions of approval will address any regulations that must be resolved. II. CHOL IUP The applicant requests approval of his home remodeling business to continue operating out of his home. Section 1030.100 establishes three levels of home occupations: Page 8 of 10 Allowed, Special, and Conditional. Any home occupation that occurs in an accessory building requires a CHOL which are processed as an IUP. While storage of equipment and materials would not trigger the CHOL by itself, the applicant shared that the first floor of the garage will occasionally be used for woodworking when he needs to construct components (such as cabinets) for a project. This type of business activity within the detached structure requires a CHOL. The City Council must consider the following criteria: A. The nature and general character of the geographic area in which the CHOL property is located. The City may consider, in addition to other factors and not by way of limitation, the existing and condition of gravel and paved roads in the area, existence and proximity of CHOL operations to neighboring residences, size of neighboring lots, and use of neighboring properties. The nature and general character of the geographic area is not likely to be negatively affected by the operation of the home business. Eagle Ridge Road is a paved public street with large residential lots. The subject property is surrounded by larger agricultural pieces to the north, west, and south. The business has been in existence (although unregistered with the City) since 2017 without it creating known negative externalities to the surrounding neighborhood. The business has no employees, and customers do not go to the property. Most business activities are completed off-site as is the nature of home remodeling. The remaining business activities will be contained primarily within the proposed accessory building that meets or exceeds all district setback requirements. The applicant indicates the proposed garage will be primarily used for storage of equipment and materials. The applicant explained to staff on a phone call that he will also use the garage at times as a shop to create products, such as cabinets. These types of activities could potentially be considered “construction activities” and would need to comply with construction hours in Chapter 82.04, Subd. 5. Provided that the woodworking activity is within the building with the doors and windows closed after 7PM on weekdays and after 4PM on weekends and holidays, staff believes the applicant will be able to comply with construction hours even with the use of tools and automatic equipment. A condition of approval included in the IUP is for woodworking and related activities to occur within the structure outside of the City’s construction hours, and the windows and doors to the structure must be closed during this time. B. Consideration shall be made for potential property devaluation of adjacent and surrounding properties. The proposed building for the business appears and can be used as a residential accessory structure. Further, the structure will provide screening of equipment Page 9 of 10 and materials so that these are not visible to nearby properties. Devaluation of the adjacent properties has neither occurred nor is expected. The narrative indicates the potential for trailers to be stored outside. This can be done as long as the trailers are not visible from the right-of-way or neighboring properties. Further, trailers cannot be stored in a temporary structure as these types of structures are prohibited in City Code. This is included as a condition of approval. To clarify, temporary structures are considered to be structures made of canvas, plastic, or other similar non-permanent building materials and/or does not meet the accessory building requirements of the MN State Building Code. C. Nuisance factors shall be considered, including but not limited to sight, odor, light, glare, and noise, and any other nuisance factors that may result from issuance of the CHOL. No exterior lighting is shown on the plan. If a light for the building is proposed, it must comply with standards in Section 1060.040. While single family homes are exempt from these standards, the commercial home occupation shall be subject to these lighting standards. This is included as a condition of approval in the draft resolution. Some business-related activities, such as woodworking, will generate some noise when manual or automatic tools are utilized. However, the operations will be inside the building and are expected to have limited impact on adjacent properties. This will be further mitigated with the condition of approval that these types of activities must occur indoors with the doors and windows closed outside of the City’s construction hours. D. Environmental concerns, including but not limited to drainage, wastewater, wells, and wetland issues. The City Engineer reviewed the overall request and attached conditions to ensure drainage is handled to avoid negative consequences as a result of the proposed structure for the home occupation. No wetland impacts were found as a result of the home occupation or the proposed structure. E. Compliance with Section 1030.020 (Accessory Buildings, Structures, Uses, and Equipment) of the Zoning Ordinance and with other relevant Code sections. If the requested CUP to allow a taller building is approved, the standards in Section 1030.020 will be satisfied. F. Impact on the neighboring properties shall be considered before issuing a CHOL. Page 10 of 10 Staff finds that the proposed CHOL for a home remodeling business that primarily operates off-site with minimal related activities taking place entirely within a garage is unlikely to result in a negative impact to the neighborhood. There are no employees, and no customers will come to the site. The applicant does not anticipate any deliveries that would not otherwise be normal to a residential area. Outside storage of trailers may occur at time, but the applicant will be required to completely screen this from neighboring properties in the right- of-way. Loud and prolonged noises may occur from time to time, but this will be limited to inside the structure with the doors and windows closed outside of the City’s construction hours. The impacts on neighboring properties can be mitigated through the proposed conditions of approval. 5. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2023-62 approving the CUP for a detached garage exceeding a sidewall height of 10’ in the front yard and the IUP for a conditional home occupation license. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2023-62 Approving the CUP and IUP 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Site Plan 4. Building Plans Received 7/18/2023 5. Engineering Memo City of Corcoran July 27, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-62 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DETACHED GARAGE WITH INCREASED SIDEWALL HEIGHT AND AN INTERIM USE PERMIT FOR A CONDITIONAL HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE FOR TYLER HEIDECKER AT 7985 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD (PID 22-119-23-42-0009) (CITY FILE 23-009) WHEREAS, Tyler Heidecker, the applicant and landowner, requested approval of an interim use permit for a conditional home occupation license (CHOL) to allow a home remodeling business and a conditional use permit to allow a taller accessory building at property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the interim use permit for a conditional home occupation license and conditional use permit at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. An interim use permit is approved, in accordance with the application received by the City on April 4, 2023, and additional information received on April 21, 2023, April 25, 2023, May 10, 2023, and July 5, 2023, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The Zoning Ordinance allows Conditional Home Occupation Licenses and the applicant shall comply with all home occupation standards, except as specifically modified per this resolution. 3. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of the City Engineer’s memo dated June 27, 2023. 4. The Interim Use Permit for the Conditional Home Occupation License is issued to Tyler Heidecker for the operation of “Heidecker Home Remodeling”. This permit is non- transferable. The Permit shall terminate upon any one of the following: a. If the business ceases. b. If property ownership changes. c. If ownership of the business changes. d. If the individual to whom a license has been issued ceases to live at the subject premises. 5. The Conditional Home Occupation License is approved based on the finding that the standards in Section 1030.100, Subd. 7 and Section 1070.030 have been met. Specifically: City of Corcoran July 27, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-62 Page 2 of 5 a. The applicant is requesting the conditional home occupation license to operate a home remodeling business from the proposed new accessory building on the property. The business has no employees other than the homeowner. b. There is nothing to indicate that the use of the accessory building would devalue adjacent and surrounding properties. c. The proposed workshop is enclosed and will not generate any nuisance conditions related to odor, light, or glare. Some noise is expected related to woodworking or similar activities. d. There are no environmental concerns, including but not limited to drainage, wastewater, wells and wetland issues related to this project. e. The home occupation appears to have no impact on neighboring properties. f. The application for a CHOL is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, public facilities, and capital improvement plans. The business will be conducted in an enclosed building and will not generate any nuisance conditions that would endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community nor will it be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity. The business does not demand any additional public services or facilities and conforms to the performance standards of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The home occupation must comply with the following standards: a. No new signage for the home occupation is proposed or approved. Any new signage will require an amendment to the Interim Use Permit for the Conditional Home Occupation License. b. Outside storage of construction materials including, but not limited to, piles of dirt, sand, lumber, bricks, concrete blocks, or sod related to the home occupation is prohibited. c. Outside storage of trailers related to the home occupation is allowed in the backyard if not visible to surrounding properties or from the public right-of-way. d. Storage of business materials and equipment is not permitted within a temporary structure defined as a structure made of canvas, plastic, or another similar non- permanent building material and/or does not meet the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code. e. Woodworking and related work activities must occur within the accessory building with the doors and windows closed during the hours when construction noises are prohibited as provided in Chapter 82.04, Subd. 5(A)(10) of the City Code and as may be amended from time to time. f. No person shall be employed at or report to the home site location who does not reside in the dwelling unit. City of Corcoran July 27, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-62 Page 3 of 5 g. If a light for the accessory building is installed, it must comply with the lighting standards in Section 1060.040 of the City Code for commercial uses. h. The business shall comply with all state, federal, and local regulations. i. The Conditional Home Occupation License shall be issued for 3 years in accordance with the procedures outlined in Section 1030.100 of the Zoning Ordinance. The permit shall be administratively reviewed every 3 years to ensure compliance with conditions of approval and ordinance requirements. j. The City may revoke or modify the CHOL upon a finding that conditions have changed to warrant revocation or modifications of the license. 7. A conditional use permit is approved to allow a 1,770 sq. ft. accessory building with sidewalls taller than 10 feet in the front yard, based on the finding that that conditional use permit standards in section 1070.020 have been met, subject to the following conditions: a. The structure cannot be used for living space unless an application for an accessory dwelling unit administrative permit is submitted and approved. b. If septic and water are planned to serve the accessory building, revised plans must be submitted with the building permit and the applicant must obtain the required permits. c. The existing temporary structure must be removed to bring the subject property into compliance with Section 1030 of the Zoning Ordinance. No new temporary structures can be added to the property. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following must be submitted for review and approval by the City: a. The grading and drainage plan must be revised per the Engineering Memo and provided to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. b. The site plan, which includes the grading and drainage plan, must be revised to reflect the revised footprint of the building of 1,770 square feet. c. The applicant/landowner must record the approving resolution at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 9. The existing temporary structure must be removed prior to release of the project escrow. City of Corcoran July 27, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-62 Page 4 of 5 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of July 2023. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk City of Corcoran July 27, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-62 Page 5 of 5 ATTACHEMENT A Lot 5, Block 1, Eagle Ridge, Hennepin County, Minnesota -Nature of Request Requesting this because of the taller height needed for my service work trailer to be backed into the shop. It has a height of There really is no way to build this in the back yard because there really is no access to drive to the backyard and most of it is a hill -Impact on adjoining properties and mitigating measures to minimize impact There are no impacts -Buildings to be constructed 1 building which will be 35x50 -Intended use of buildings and property To store, manage and work on service work trailers -Hours and days of operation There will be no business run out of the building. Only intended for storing and maintain the work equipment. -Number of Employees 0 -Size of operation, including number of animails 0 -Impact on traffic, Including type and amount of traffic, access, and parking provisions None -Impact on septic system and well None -Potential Environmental impacts and measure to avoid or minimize the potential impacts None -Proposed measures to provide buffering from proposed use to adjacent properties None Needed -Future Expansion plans None -Nature of the other uses in the neighborhood None Home Occupation Application 1. I run a Remodeling Company, Heidecker Home Services LLC. We are already in business. Have been since 2017 2. My business does not generate any extreme noise odor or light 3. My company does not generate any environmental concerns or issues 4. The home occupation will be located on site in the accessory building and will used 80 percent of the building 5. Special equipment my company requires is a enclosed work trailer and a Skid steer. 6. Any outside storage is only for trailers 7. My company does not require any materials that would need a MSDS sheet 8. My company does not generate any deliveries other than normal. 9. My occupation does not generate more than 10 daily, non-residential trips to and from property 10. There are no customer visits on site 11. Home occupation does not require any additional parking spaces 12. No outside employees are on site or reporting on site for assignments 13. There are no signs displayed for the home occupation 14. No special vehicles are used for the home occupation 15. No federal, state, county local permits or licenses are required 33Sound34T-PostEAGLERIDGE222.7EAGLE RIDGE ROAD7.035.050.0 25.720.015.010. 0 20.050.0’ 1'-6"1'-6" 1210 121012'-0" x 12'-0"OVHD. DR.12'-0" x 12'-0"OVHD. DR.LP SIDING &TRIMN 1232'-0"ROOF VENTS AS REQ'DPER CODE1'-0"1'-0"1'-6"1'-6"1'-0"1'-0"LP SIDING& TRIMLP SIDING& TRIMLP SIDING& TRIM6"6"121012101232'-0"1'-0"1'-0"OPTIONALDECK/STAIROPTIONALDECK/STAIROPTIONALDECK/STAIRFRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION1/8"= 1'-0"REAR ELEVATION1/4"= 1'-0"RIGHT ELEVATION1/8"= 1'-0"1/8"= 1'-0"DISCLAIMERIN PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN EVERYATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO AVOIDMISTAKES. DESIGNER CANNOT GUARANTEEAGAINST HUMAN ERROR. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONSAND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME.THESE DESIGNS, CONCEPTS ANDSPECIFICATIONS ARE INSTRUMENTS OFSERVICE AND AS SUCH REMAIN THEEXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF COUNTRY LUMBERAND ARE NOT TO BE COPIED WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF COUNTRY LUMBER.12575 OAK VIEW AVE. BECKER, MN. 55308 PHONE: (763) 262-4750 FAX: (763) 262-4445 1-800-247-0295 DESIGN CENTER OFDESIGN FOR:DRAWN BY: DRAWING#20 P: R: R: F:1423.038 HEIDECKER GARAGE RK 03/24/23 03/28/23 04/21/23 06/30/23 8" POURED CONC. FDN.x 3'-6" W/ SLAB LEDGE ON20"x 8" CONC. FTG.UNEXCAVATED1'-4"3'-2"44'-4 1/2"59'-0"30'-0"59'-0"1'-10 1/2"12'-3"1'-10 1/2"30'-0"8" POURED CONC. FDN.x 3'-6" W/ SLAB LEDGE ON20"x 8" CONC. FTG.12'-3"1'-9"8'-3"1'-10 1/2"6x6 WOOD POST ON12" Ø x 48" DEEPCONC. PIER FTG.6'-0"10'-0"6'-0"10'-0"2'-0"4'-0"10'-0"12'-0"3'-2"43'-10"BASEMENT PLAN1/4"= 1'-0"OF24BASEMENT PLAN OPTION EXTERIOR STAIR1/4"= 1'-0" 4" CONC. FLR. SLABW/ 6x6-10/10 W.W.M.GARAGE2-2x103/02-2x10 2-2x10DH. 363612'-0" x12'-0"OVHD. DR.2-11 7/8" LVL2'-10"16'-10"19'-8"13'-8"59'-0"30'-0"19'-8"19'-8"19'-8" 59'-0"8'-0"14'-0"8'-0"30'-0"2-11 7/8" LVL12'-0" x12'-0"OVHD. DR.8'-0" x7'-0"OVHD. DR.3-11 7/8" LVL 6'-0" UP24R DN.24RDH. 36602-2x10DH. 36602-2x10BONUS RM.KNEE WALL7'-0"7'-0"14'-0"59'-0"5'-4"8'-8"SLOPEDCLG.SLOPEDCLG.FLATCLG.4'-0"55'-0"11'-8"14'-4"4'-0"7'-0"7'-0"14'-0"ROOM-IN-ATTICROOF TRUSSES@ 2'-0" O.C.ROOM-IN-ATTICROOF TRUSSES@ 2'-0" O.C.DH. 3636 GIRDER TRUSS2-2x10 FL.4'-0"6'-0"49'-0"2-2x10 2-2x10DH. 3636 DH. 3636 GIRDER ROOFTRUSSGIRDER ROOFTRUSSGIRDER ROOFTRUSSGIRDER ROOFTRUSSDH. 3048-2 DH. 3048-2 2-2x10 2-2x10 13'-0"10'-0"13'-0"10'-0"13'-0" 5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"6'-0"2'-0"GIRDER ROOFTRUSSGIRDER ROOFTRUSSGIRDER ROOFTRUSSGIRDER ROOFTRUSS3-9 1/2" LVL FL.3-9 1/2" LVL FL. DN.8'-0" x7'-0" OVHD. DR. 3-11 7/8" LVL 6x6 WOODPOST2x10 FLR. JST. @ 16" O.C. DBL. JSTS. DBL. JSTS.2-2x103/0BONUS RM.6'-0"DECK5'-0"5'-0"10'-0"2-2x106'-0"10'-0"2'-0"4'-0" 6'-0" 2'-0"4'-0" 6'-0"10'-0"2-2x10 2x12 STRINGERS3/02-9 1/2"LVL OF34SECOND FLOOR PLAN1/4"= 1'-0"826 SFT. (BONUS RM.)FIRST FLOOR PLAN1/4"= 1'-0"1770 SFT. (GARAGE)FIRST FLOOR PLAN OPTION EXTERIOR STAIR1/4"= 1'-0"SECOND FLOOR PLAN OPTION EXTERIOR STAIR1/4"= 1'-0" 20'-6 1/2"5/8" GYP BD. CLG.VAPOR BARRIERR-44 INSUL.2x6 @ 16" O.C.R-19 FIBERGL. INSUL.VAPOR BARRIER7/16" OSB SHTG.1/2" GYP. BD WALLSLP SIDING & TRIMGRADE 1210ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSESW/ ENERGY HEEL @ 2'-0" O.C.1/2" OSB BD. SHTG.15# FELTICE & WATER SHIELDASPHALT SHINGLES2x6 TREATED SILL PLATE1/2" Ø ANCHOR BOLT@ 6'-0" O.C.SILL SEALER2x6 SUBFASCIAALUM. SOFFIT & FASCIACONT. SOFFIT VENTRIGID WIND WASH BARRIERAIR CHUTE8"13'-4"1'-6"24 RISERS @ 7 7/16" = 14'-10" 8'-1 1/8"10"4" CONC.FLR. SLABGRADE1'-0"1'-8" 12330'-0"1'-6"2'-0"8'-1 1/8" 14'-0"4" 1210SEE BUILDERS SPECIFICATION FOR BUILDING MATERIALSBUILDING SECTION3/8"=1'-0"OF44 Memo To: Natalie Davis McKeown Planner From: Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Project: Heidecker CUP/IUP Date: June 27h, 2023 Summary: • The Heidecker CUP/IUP grading plan by Northwestern Surveying and Engineering dated 05/03/2023 was reviewed and the grading comments are as follows: o Drainage from Eagle Ridge Road cannot be blocked, therefore a culvert appears necessary and revised plans should be submitted for City review. o Grading (fill) is shown within the drainage and utility easement and should be revised to allow flow from Eagle Ridge Road. o A low spot may trap drainage along the north side of the new driveway. • The site completed the WCA process and had a determination of no wetland impacts for the project. Agenda Item: 7j. City of Corcoran July 27, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-64 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran that the following Liquor License is granted effective for the dates as indicated, to the following Licensee, provided appropriate application and insurance documents. LICENSEE LICENSE LICENSE EFFECTIVE DATE NW Area Jaycees* 13570 Grove Drive #287 Maple Grove, MN 55311 1 Day to 4 Day Temporary On-Sale Liquor License Corcoran Country Daze August 10-13, 2023 (4-day License) Event Location: Corcoran Lions Park 7205 County Road 101 Corcoran, MN 55340 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of July, 2023. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Agenda Item: 7k. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7l. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Deputy Director Burns Topic: Waiver request for amplified sound on September 30, 2023 Action Required: Approval Summary Resident is requesting a Amplified Sound Waiver on Saturday September 30, 2023, at 9310 Bechtold Road. Request is for amplified sound until 12:00 AM for a wedding gathering of approximately 100 guests with a DJ inside of a barn. This is a private event, with off-street parking and possible one-side street parking on Bechtold Road. If approved, gathering may be shut down for public safety reasons. At this point, the application is approved as submitted. Financial/Budget N/A Options 1.Authorize a waiver for amplified sound until 12:00 AM on Saturday, September 30, 2023. 2.Deny a waiver for amplified sound until 12:00 AM on Saturday August 20, 2023. Council Action 1.Authorize a waiver for amplified sound until 12:00 AM on Saturday, September 30, 2023, for 9310 Bechtold Road. Attachments 1.Application for Contract Police Security. Attachment: 7I1. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7m. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Street Maintenance – Maltene Based Restorative Seal Coat Action Required: Informational Summary At the June 22, 2023 Council meeting, staff was directed to obtain quotes for maltene based restorative seal coat. Staff is working on compiling the quotes and will bring forward quotes and a preferred vendor. Attachments 1. Quotes ( To be provided prior to the meeting) Quote Form 2023 Maltene Based Restorative Seal Base Quote Item Mobilization (including own health and safety, resident notices, traffic control, etc.) Maltene Based Application Post Application Sweeping Units Lump Sum Sq Yd Lump Sum Quantity 1 51865 1 Unit Rate $1450.00 $1.03 $4150.00 Base Quote Total Corrective Asphalt Materials, LLC Compan�� 07/__--( Member Signature (Title) Start of Work Date U:1227702426\technical\Pavement Management\2023 Reclamite Quotes\2023 Maltene Restoration_Quote Form.xis Total Cost $1450.00 $53,420.95 $4150.00 $59,020.95 7/27/2023 Date Agenda Item: 7m1. Page 1 of 13 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 8a. City Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Natalie Davis McKeown Topic: Hackamore 116 Sketch Plat (PID 36-119-23-33-0010; 36-119-23-33-0009; and 36-119-23-33-0007) (City File No. 23-017) Action Required: Direction 1. Application Request Gonyea Company, the applicant, requests an opportunity to appear before the City Council to solicit informal comments on a concept plat for 36.74 acres located at the northeast corner of Hackamore Road and County Road 116. The proposal would include a rezoning to the RSF- 3 (Single and Two-Family Residential) Zoning District with variances to the side setback and two engineering standards. 2. Background The subject properties include three properties previously used for agriculture. The enclosed Engineering Memo notes a portion of this property will be utilized for construction staging for the Hackamore Road Project. The project area is also subject to a recapture agreement established with Tavera for the installation of a sanitary sewer line that benefits these properties. The City will be responsible for coordinating reimbursement to Lennar at the final platting stage(s). 3. Context Zoning and Land Use The proposed property is guided for low density residential and zoned RSF-2 (Single Family Residential 2). There appears to be at least one agricultural structure in the proposed project area. Up until this point, the land use has been agricultural. The property is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and Phase 1 of the 2040 Staging Plan. Figure 1 Project Location Page 2 of 13 Surrounding Properties The guiding, zoning, and existing use of the surrounding properties are detailed in the table below. All surrounding properties are within the MUSA. Direction Guided Zoning District Use Staging Phase North - Low Density Residential - Existing Residential - RSF-2 - Urban Reserve Residential - Phase 1 - Phase 4 (2035-2040) East Existing Residential Urban Reserve Residential Phase 4 South Medina Medina Residential N/A West Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) – Tavera Residential Phase 1 Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2040 Comprehensive Plan’s Natural Resource Inventory Areas map does not show any high-quality natural communities on the subject properties. There is an emergent wetland community indicated on the eastern portion of the project site. A wetland delineation was approved by the City in January 2021 and does not expire until January 2026. The delineation confirmed 10 wetlands throughout the proposed project site. The Hennepin County Natural Resources Map indicates the larger wetland complex in the southeast portion of the site may be a DNR protected water and is identified as Flood Zone A. The enclosed Engineering Memo provides that a Letter of Map Revision was finalized by FEMA in January 2023 which better defined the floodplain within the proposed project area. This process carved out an additional 1.78 acres of upland within the project area. A figure Figure 2 Hennepin County Natural Resources Map Page 3 of 13 showing the previous and revised floodplain boundaries within the project area is provided in Attachment of A of the Engineering Memo. 4. Analysis Planning staff coordinated review of the sketch plat with Public Works and Engineering as well as the Public Safety team. Memos from the City Engineer and Public Safety team are enclosed in this report as well as incorporated into the following analysis as appropriate. The applicant is responsible for reviewing the entirety of both memos and incorporating the feedback as the project moves forward. Use The concept plan for “Hackamore 116” proposes a residential neighborhood of 66 lots for single-family homes. The applicant’s narrative indicates the lots are intended to be sold to one or more local builders for the construction of custom homes. Each home and lot will be individually owned and maintained. No neighborhood recreational amenities are proposed. The developer intends to establish a Homeowners Association for the entire neighborhood to meet the applicant’s vision for the neighborhood regarding building types, varied front elevations, house colors, landscaping, and other overall goals for the neighborhood. Figure 3 Hackamore 116 Sketch Plat Page 4 of 13 Lot Analysis The lot standards for the existing RSF-2 district are as follows: RSF-2 Standard Minimum Lot Area 11,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 80 ft. Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks - Front, Major Roadways 100 ft. - Front, All Other Streets 20 ft. - Front Porch (less than 120 sq. ft.) 15 ft. - Side (living) 10 ft. - Side (garage)* 5 ft. - Rear 30 ft. Maximum Principal Building Height 35 ft. * Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 ft. However, the applicant proposes to rezone the project area to RSF-3. The Zoning Ordinance states that the RSF-3 district “is intended to be the primary single-family zoning district for future residential developments.” The setbacks are the same in RSF-3 as RSF-2, but there are smaller lot size standards for single-family homes as provided in the table below. RSF-3 Standard Minimum Lot Area 7,500 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 65 ft. The concept plan proposes 66 lots with lot widths of 65’. Individual lot areas were not provided, but the plat would be expected to comply with the minimum of 7,500 sq. ft. Measuring a few of the proposed lots suggest the plat will be able to comply with this standard. The applicant requests a variance for a 7.5’ setback to be applied to both the garage and living sides for a minimum separate of 15’. The applicant’s argument for the variance is it will provide the most flexibility for builders to place a home on a lot. In exchange, the applicant notes the intention of voluntarily adhering to a 25’ front setback. Lots that abut County Road 116 are subject to a 100’ setback. The applicant’s narrative notes that some of the homes will be as close to 60’ from County Road 116, but they will provide the necessary landscaping to obtain this flexibility as permitted by right in City Code. It will be helpful for the Council to provide feedback on the requested rezoning and variance to the side setback of RSF-3. Density The concept plan provides an estimated net density of 2.58 units per acre. This number was reached by taking the overall site area of 36.74 acres and deducting the Page 5 of 13 Hackamore Road right-of-way (ROW) (0.49 acres), the County Road 116 ROW (0.63 acres), the area containing wetlands and land below the 100-year ordinary high-water level (6.88 acres), and the estimated wetland buffers (3.18 acres). The Comprehensive Plan requires a density of 3-5 units per acre in areas guided as low density residential. It is unclear if the current design will ultimately meet a post-development density of 3 units per acre as required, and the applicant’s narrative notes that the number of lots may be reduced further as some of the lots may be increased to a width of 75’ to accommodate a 60’ wide home. Architectural Design Requirements All urban residential zoning districts must comply with the design requirements provided in Section 1040.040, Subd. 8 of the Zoning Ordinance. A minimum of 5 different front elevation styles must be provided. Four concept elevations were provided with the application. It should be noted the elevations may change since the builder is not yet determined, and there may be multiple builders. The narrative indicates that most homes have multiple front elevation options. Regardless, an additional example style must be provided with the formal application, and architectural requirements will be confirmed further with each building permit. Homes in proximity to each other shall not look alike in terms of the combination of color of siding, accent, and roofing materials as compared to the two homes on each side and the three homes directly facing the home under consideration. Figure 4 Example Elevations Page 6 of 13 The front elevation shall have material consisting of brick, stone, stucco, fiber cement board, redwood, cedar, or something similar. Additionally, the front elevation shall have no more than 75% of any one type of exterior finish unless the finish is brick, stucco, and/or stone. Further, if vinyl siding is proposed, it must be used in combination with the above discussed materials, and a minimum of 3 different variations in color, style, and/or material is required. Not enough information was provided to confirm the submitted elevations comply with these standards. The building materials and percentages would need to be confirmed on the example elevations provided in the preliminary application. The residential architectural standards require the front elevation to consist of doors, windows, and variations of the wall face with the use of architectural elements such as pilasters or columns, wainscots, or canopies. This appears to be satisfied with the submitted elevations with the use of columns and variations within the rooflines. Garages must be architecturally styled to match the exterior design of the home and must not comprise more than 55% of the viewable ground floor street-facing linear building frontage. The concept elevations may be able to comply with this standard, but this can be difficult with 3-car garages. The measurement and percentage of the garage structure must be confirmed with the preliminary application. Allowable roofing materials include asphalt shingles, wood shingles, concrete, clay, ceramic tile, or residential steel roofing with hidden fasteners. Roof overhangs must be at least 12 inches. It appears the submitted concept elevations will be able to comply with these standards. Each façade that faces a street shall receive equal architectural treatment as the front elevation in terms of materials and articulation. The following lots appear to have multiple facades that are oriented or visible to a public street: 1-11, 21, 22, 29, 32, 49, 59, and 60. Lots 12-16 and 25-27 appear to be oriented to a public street, but these lots appear to be separated from the street through a combination of vegetation, distance, wetlands, and/or stormwater ponds. However, it is unclear how wooded these areas will be and whether these lots will be visible from the street. More information would be needed to determine visibility. It will be helpful for the Council to discuss if lots separated from a public street by vegetation, sufficient distance, wetlands and/or stormwater ponds require equal façade treatment if it is determined the façade is not visible from the public street. Streets & Access Page 7 of 13 The sketch plan shows one access to serve the development located on Hackamore Road in the south of the project area. The Engineering Memo provides that turn lanes from Hackamore Road into the proposed development are being installed with the Hackamore Road Project in accordance with an existing agreement with the landowner. All 66 homes would be served by public streets, and there are four cul-de- sacs shown on the sketch plan. The plan also shows a route utilizing the existing driveway on County Road 116; the applicant confirmed this could be used for access to the wetlands and ponds in the area. The concept plan includes a ghost plat of two properties to the north with existing homes that could potentially further subdivide (a 1.88-acre parcel within the current stage of phasing to receive municipal services and a 9.95-acre parcel that is within the 4th stage). The ghost plat shows the potential for an eventual second access to be added at the time these properties subdivide. Figure 5 Existing Driveway Access Figure 6 Ghost Plat Page 8 of 13 The Southeast District Plan (Appendix B in the Zoning Ordinance) states cul-de-sacs should be avoided in favor of a continuous road network. While natural features and pre-existing conditions may necessitate the occasional use of cul-de-sacs, City staff recommends the two western cul-de-sacs be connected to create a loop. In addition to compliance with the Southeast District Plan, there are Engineering and Public Safety considerations behind creating this connection. Per the Engineering Memo, abutting cul-de-sacs are discouraged due to the additional maintenance and stubbed utilities. The Public Safety Memo argues for connectivity for the sake of emergency access ease throughout the development. This connectivity is seen all the more crucial by Public Safety should there indeed be only one access to serve all 66 homes. The Engineering Memo states that a feasibility study will be required to review the development impacts on the transportation system. The single access point on Hackamore Road is a concern called out in both the Engineering Memo and Public Safety Memo. Since the project area has frontage along County Road 116, Public Safety opines that a second access on County Road 116 is both possible and necessary at the outset of the development considering the proposed density of homes. The necessity and location of the second access will need to be further reviewed and discussed with City Staff and Hennepin County. If Hennepin County were to not approve of an access point within the proposed project area, the existing driveway access could be used as an interim emergency access for Public Safety. Under this scenario, the two western cul-de-sacs will need to be connected to create a loop for the emergency access route. The applicant’s narrative indicates the southeast cul-de-sac will need flexibility from the City’s Engineering Design Standards that require a 60’ ROW and a pavement radius of 50’. Instead, the applicant proposes a 50’ ROW with a pavement radius of 42’. This would be a variance request. Figure 7 Two Western Cul-De-Sacs Page 9 of 13 The applicant’s narrative explains this flexibility is requested due to the constraints placed on the location by the large wetland complex and Hackamore Road. The Engineering Memo does not provide support for deviation from the Engineering Design Standards as these were established to ensure public maintenance and public safety vehicles can safely use these areas. Additionally, these design standards are supported by the school district. The Public Safety Memo strongly urges adherence to City specifications. However, Public Safety provides that an 18’-wide emergency access with bollards in this area could be an acceptable alternative for their needs should the cul- de-sac remain as proposed. The viability of this alternative option would need to be reviewed further with Public Works and Engineering. It will be helpful for the Council to provide feedback on this variance request. Parking Parking standards are provided in Section 1060.060 of the Zoning Ordinance. Single- family homes require two parking spaces per unit. The concept elevations show 3-car garages, so the proposed neighborhood would comply/exceed this standard. There is no driveway setback, but driveways are not permitted in drainage and utility easements, which typically span the first 5’ from the side property lines. The concept plan does not provide driveway locations, but it appears they will be able to comply with this standard. Trails and Parks A proposed on-road trail is shown along Hackamore Road on the Parks and Trails Plan in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This on-road trail is reflected on the proposed sketch plat and is being constructed with the Hackamore Road project. The developer would not get park dedication credit for the on-road trail as it will be located within the City’s ROW. Figure 8 Southeast Cul-De-Sac Page 10 of 13 Lighting Street lighting will be required as a part of the development. A lighting plan was not provided, but the applicant would be expected to comply with the performance standards in Section 1060.040 of the Zoning Ordinance. Street lighting locations will be reviewed by Public Safety with the final lighting locations determined at the time of final plat. Landscaping A landscaping plan was not provided which is typical at the sketch plan stage. The applicant will be expected to comply with the City’s landscaping standards in Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance. Residential developments require one new overstory tree per dwelling unit. Buffer Ordinance Assuming the project area is rezoned to RSF-3, a buffer yard would be required to the east, west, and north. A buffer yard class “B” would apply to the east and north. The planted buffer yard options are provided in the table below. This buffer yard must be included on the landscaping plan, but it will not count towards the other minimum landscaping requirements. Buffer Yard Class Width Overstory Plantings1 Understory Plantings1 Shrubs1,2 Structures3 B 10’ 1 6 6 Minimum 4’ fence 20’ 3 6 9 None 20’ 1 2 3 Minimum 4’ fence 30’ 2 4 12 None 30’ 1 2 4 Minimum 4’ fence 1 Per 100 feet of distance 2 Requirement must be met by shrubs, tall native prairie plantings, or a combination deemed acceptable by the City 3 Fences are subject to requirements in Section 1060.080 The buffer yard ordinance allows the City Council to accept wetlands as a natural buffer. The Council should discuss whether this makes sense for Wetlands 2 and 3 along the project borders on the east of the site. Since Tavera is a PUD, it is considered RSF-3 for the sake of the applying this ordinance. This means the minimum front setback must be maintained. This is compatible with the 60’ setback proposed by the applicant providing additional landscaping as required by City Code. Wetlands Page 11 of 13 As previously noted, a wetland delineation was completed for this property in 2021 and is still valid. Wetlands 1 and 2 in the southeast portion of the site are known to be DNR- protected. The applicant’s narrative proposes to fill 3 of the smaller wetlands (Wetland 4 in the northern central area of the site, Wetland 10 centrally located within the project, and Wetland 8 located in the southwest corner of the site near Hackamore). Wetlands 1 and 2 are labeled as low-quality wetlands on the City’s Natural Resources Communities Quality Ranking Map. Per Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance, low- quality wetlands require a minimum buffer average of 15’ (the buffer can be no less than 10’ and no wider than 20’ for the purposes of calculating the average). The remaining wetlands are not shown on this map. The City assumes wetlands not included on this map to be of medium quality. However, there is a MNRAM process with the State of MN the applicant can pursue to confirm the wetlands are considered low quality to reduce the required buffer area. Otherwise, medium quality wetlands must have an average wetland buffer width of 25’ (the buffer can be no less than 20’ and no wider than 40’ for the purposes of calculating this average). There is an additional 15’ structure setback that is applied from the edge of the wetland buffer. Roads and trails and related retaining walls or fences have a 5’ setback from the wetland buffer. It appears the buffer shown on the concept plan may not quite meet the minimum and maximum buffers allowed for the purposes of satisfying the wetland buffer average. Calculations will need to be provided with the preliminary plat to confirm the average buffer requirements are satisfied. Wetland buffer monuments are required at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer, and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of 200 feet of wetland edge. For the most part, the concept plan appears to comply with this standard. However, there may be a few areas where monuments will need to be added in the preliminary plat application. For example, the western wetland edges of wetlands 5 and 6 in the northwest corner of the project area do not appear to have any buffer monuments. The proposed impacts to the 3 affected wetlands must be reviewed and approved through the appropriate WCA permitting process. If for some reason approval is not granted, the site design would need to be modified accordingly to avoid the wetlands and account for the required wetland buffers. Wetland buffers will need to be shown along with the required wetland buffer monuments at the time of preliminary plat. As part of a wetland buffer establishment plan, the applicant must confirm whether they plan to use existing buffers as allowed and defined by City Code or if they plan to establish new buffers. The wetland buffer establishment plan will be reviewed and approved by the City’s wetland specialist. Utilities Page 12 of 13 The applicant’s narrative explains the proposed sanitary sewer design has one manhole (manhole 9) proposed at an invert elevation depth of 5.4 feet where the City Engineering Design Standard is 7.5’. All other invert depths in the neighborhood would meet the minimum standard of 7.5’. The applicant argues that with the inclusion of insulation, the shallower depth of manhole 9 will function property and has been used elsewhere in the Twin Cities. The Engineering Memo provides the sanitary sewer connection locations will be reviewed as part of the feasibility study to identify potential corridors that could be utilized to construct the system in accordance with City standards. Deviation from this standard would be handled as a variance, and it will be helpful for the Council to provide feedback to the applicant on this request. The Engineering Memo touches on various other items related to municipal water for the site. It is noted that the development team previously asked the City to review the watermain requirements for the project area during the design of the Hackamore Road Project. The analysis identified that a looped water system with two connections is necessary to adequately supply this development. Additionally, a future water connection corridor was identified as a part of the Hackamore Project and is bring preserved. The Memo provides that if Street C remains a cul-de-sac (the furthest southwest cul-de-sac), the watermain should be looped in this area. As part of the feasibility study, Engineering will review the development impacts on the overall public utility system. Stormwater Management The Engineering Memo provides several comments on stormwater management for the site and notes a feasibility study will further review the development impacts on the stormwater system. There is a concern that the proposed sand filtration systems shown on the concept plan will have challenges with access and maintenance. If filtration is required by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC), the City strongly prefers the utilization of a NURP pond with a filter bench offset to one side of the pond and adequate access. Additionally, the Engineering Memo indicates that increased drainage from Hackamore will enter the site as part of the Hackamore Road Project being constructed cooperatively with Medina. A portion of this runoff will be treated within the proposed development. A stormwater management plan will be required to confirm compliance with the City of Corcoran and ECWMC regulations. The applicant should refer to the City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines for Development Review for standards (enclosed to this report for reference). As noted in previous concept plan revies, the City is in the process of establishing a stormwater area charge. This charge may be in place by the time of final plat. If this charge is on the City’s fee schedule at the time of final plat, it will be applicable to the project. Summary of Discussion Points Page 13 of 13 In summary, it will be helpful for the Council to provide feedback on the following components of the sketch plan: - Rezoning from RSF-2 to RSF-3. - Variance to side setback requirement of 10’ (living side) and 5’ (garage side) to a 7.5’ setback on either side. - If a façade is oriented to a public street but not visible to the street due to vegetation placed within a separation created by a combination of distance, wetlands, and/or stormwater ponds, should the equal architectural treatment clause still apply? - Access for the development. - Deviations from the City’s Engineering Standards: o 50’ cul-de-sac ROW in the southeast corner of the site with a 42’ pavement radius where 60’ and 50’ (respectively) are required. o An invert elevation depth of 5.4’ with insulation for manhole 9 where 7.5’ is required. - Use of eastern wetlands in the project area as a natural buffer in place of buffer requirement. Next Steps Assuming this project moves forward, the next steps are outlined below: 1. Feasibility study. 2. A land use application for a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Variance. 3. WCA permitting for wetland impacts. 4. A land use application for a Final Plat. 5. Watershed approval of City-approved final grading and stormwater plans. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss the sketch plat and provide the applicant with informal comments. The Council should provide clear direction to the applicant so that they can decide whether to proceed with a formal application. Any comments given by the City Council are advisory in nature and non-binding. While the comments are non-binding, the applicant will consider the input from the City Council when they prepare their formal submittal. Attachments: 1. Applicant Narrative Dated June 21, 2023. 2. Sketch Plan Exhibits. 3. Public Safety Memo Dated July 20, 2023. 4. Engineering Memo Dated July 19, 2023. 5. City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines for Development Review. 1 Hackamore 116 – Development Narrative Gonyea Company is excited to provide the concept development application for the Hackamore 116 neighborhood (actual plat/neighborhood name to be determined) located in the northeast corner of the Hackamore Road and County Road 116 intersection. Gonyea Company has a strong history of creating quality neighborhoods in the west metro, including many in the cities of Plymouth and maple Grove, and we plan to build on that history with the creation of the Hackamore 116 neighborhood. The Hackamore 116 neighborhood as shown includes a total of 66 detached home sites. The lots will be sold to one or more quality local builders for the construction of custom homes. 2 Development Team Developer/Property Owner: Gonyea Company Dave Gonyea Jake Walesch 6885 Sycamore Lane N Suite 110 Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 Email: jake@jakewalesch.com Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor: Sathre-Berquist, Inc. Robert S. Molstad, P.E. 14000 25th Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Telephone: 952-476-6000 Email: molstad@sathre.com Project Manager: Steve Juetten 6885 Sycamore Lane N Suite 110 Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 Telephone: 612-269-2531 Email: steve@gonyeacompany.com Landscape Design: Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Jenni Thompson, PLA, AICP, JD 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Telephone: 651-681-1914 Email: jthompson@pioneereng.com Soil Sciences Haugo Geo Technical Services Paul Haugo 2825 Cedar Avenue S Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407 Telephone: 612-554-4829 Email: p.haugo@gmail.com Concept Site Plan To accommodate the proposed site plan, a zoning change is necessary that would change the current zoning from RSF-2 to RSF-3. The change will allow for the use of 65-foot-wide lots that will more efficiently utilize the site which contains several wetlands and boarders Hackamore Road and County Road 116. There is a possibility that as the design moves from sketch plan to preliminary plat the total number of lots may be reduced by changing some lots to 75 feet wide to accommodate an even larger 60-foot-wide home series. The home sites are being developed for the construction of single-family homes that will be built by one or more quality builders that have built hundreds of homes throughout the Twin Cities market. Each home and lot will be individually owned and maintained. Examples of the house product are shown on page 3. The current neighborhood design does not include any neighborhood recreational amenities. The conceptual site design proposes filling three small wetlands and preserving seven larger wetlands. The design also has a few lots that will have reduced setbacks down to 60 feet from either County Road 116 or Hackamore Road. Additional landscaping as required by City Code will be provided on these lots. 3 The proposed design includes one cul-de-sac (southeast most cul-de-sac) that requires subdivision flexibility due to the constraints placed on the location by the large wetland and Hackamore Road. The requested flexibility reduces the right of way from 60 feet to 50 feet and reduces the pavement radius from 50 feet to 42 feet. The proposed sanitary sewer design has one manhole, manhole 9, proposed at an invert elevation depth of 5.4 feet where the City Standard is 7.5 feet. All other invert depths in the neighborhood are at the minimum required 7.5 feet. With the inclusion of insulation, this shallower depth will function properly. This design has been used elsewhere throughout the Twin Cities. To provide the most flexibility for a builder to place a home on a lot, consideration is being requested for non-street side setbacks to be 7½ feet and 7½ feet rather than 5 feet and 10 feet. This would maintain the desired 15-foot setback between houses. It should be noted that the proposed neighborhood front yard setback is 25 feet. Housing / Product Currently the builders have not been chosen for the neighborhood. However, based on past neighborhoods development in the west metro, below are examples of the housing expected. The homes shown below are 50’ wide homes. The preliminary plat application is anticipated to have some wider lots that will accommodate 60’ wide homes. 4,414 Finished Sq. Ft. 2,981 – 3,125 Finished Sq. Ft. 5,007-5,259 Finished Sq. Ft. 4,335 Finished Sq. Ft. Most homes come with multiple front elevations and interior room options which allows for a greatly improved street scape. 4 Homeowner’s Association and Restrictive Covenants A Homeowners Association (HOA) will be created for this neighborhood. The Developer will prepare restrictive covenants and standards that will apply to the entire neighborhood. The restrictive covenants will be tailored to the Developer’s vision of the neighborhood. Each house will be required to meet the specifics of building types, varied front elevations, house colors, landscaping, and overall goals of the neighborhood. Page 1 of 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@corcoranmn.gov / Web Site – www.corcoranmn.gov Memo To: Planning (Planners Lindahl and Davis McKeown) From: Lieutenant Burns Date: July 20, 2023 Re: City File 23-017 Leuer Sketch Planned Unit Development Plat A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on July 12, 2023, to review a concept plan received by the City on June 21, 2023, for the properties located on the northeast corner of County Road 116 and Hackamore Road. In attendance were: Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Planner Davis McKeown, Fire Chief Leuer, Fire Chief Malewicki, Fire Chief Farrens, and Building Official Geske. The comments below are based on the preliminary review of the plans and are intended as initial feedback as further plan review will need to be completed as construction plans are finalized. 1. A second entrance to serve the development appears to be both possible and necessary. Based on the proposed density within the project as well as existing and anticipated traffic intensity of the surrounding roadways, a second access should be accommodated on the outset of the development rather than waiting for future platting to the north. 2. For the sake of traffic flow and emergency access, the two west cul-de-sacs should be connected as a loop. This connection is all the more critical should there be only one access point for the development. 3. If Hennepin County does not permit an access from County Road 116 within the proposed project area, the existing driveway on to County Road 116 could serve as an emergency vehicle access as an interim measure until a full second access can be provided by a future development to the north. A route would need to be provided with a width of at least 18’. • Under this scenario, connection of the two west cul-de-sacs is necessary for emergency vehicle access to and navigation of the development. 4. It is strongly urged that the applicant be required to adhere to City specifications on the southeast cul-de-sac regarding the minimum right-of-way and paving radius. • Another option that would be acceptable to Public Safety is to put an 18’-wide emergency access in this area with bollards. Memo To:Kevin Mattson, PE, Public Works Director From:Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project:Hackamore/116 NE Concept Date:July 19, 2023 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the Hackamore/116 NE site concept plan by Lakeview Development Company with the following documents; a. Concept Plan Hackamore / 116 NE site by Sathre Berquist, application dated 6/14/2023. The concept shows 66 single family units. Comments: General: 1. Comments provided are preliminary based on the Concept Plan provided. Additional comments should be anticipated on future submittals that include more details of the development. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the proposed plans are subject to the review of planning, zoning, Public Safety, and all other applicable codes and standards of the City of Corcoran, NPDES, ECWMC, Hennepin County, etc. 3. A feasibility study will be conducted on the development with the preliminary plat approval to review the development impacts on transportation system, stormwater system, and public utility system. 4. A portion of this property will be utilized for construction staging for the Hackamore Road project. Plat: 5. The applicant shall show all drainage and utility easements and all platting requirements are met per the City Code. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided per City requirements. 6. Easements should be provided over all infrastructure used for the maintenance, conveyance and treatment of stormwater. 7. Easements should be provided over any/all public infrastructure as applicable. 8. Any existing easements should be provided to the City for review. Vacation of existing easements currently in place requires a City process and should be identified in the project schedule. Transportation 9. Turn lanes from Hackamore Road into the proposed development are being installed with the Hackamore Road project in accordance with an existing agreement with landowner. 10. Abutting cul-de-sacs are discouraged due to the additional maintenance and stubbed utilities. The applicant should review if the cul-de-sacs along the western portion of the development can be removed and the viability of connecting these roadways. 11. The Concept Plan identifies a secondary entrance to the development through a future development to the north. The need for a secondary entrance should be reviewed with Public Safety. If a second July 2023 Hackamore/116 NE Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 3 entrance is necessary, the location should be reviewed with City Staff and Hennepin County to determine the appropriate location within this corridor. 12. The applicant is showing a turnaround in the southeast corner of the development which does not meet City standards. This turnaround should be revised to accommodate City Standards. These turnaround standards were established to ensure that public maintenance and public safety vehicles can safely use these areas and is supported by the school districts. 13. A trail adjacent to this parcel is being constructed with the Hackamore Road project. 14. Appropriate ROW for Hackamore and CR 116 will be dedicated with this project. Stormwater 15. A stormwater management plan will be required for this development in accordance with City of Corcoran and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Standards. 16. Reference the City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines for Development Review for standards for stormwater systems and modeling. 17. Wetland delineations for this site have been completed and any impacts will follow WCA protocols. 18. The wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage shall be clearly identified and labeled. If existing vegetation is proposed to be used as wetland buffer, these areas shall be reviewed with the City of Corcoran wetland specialist to determine if they are viable candidates. 19. The site discharges west (through a CR 116 culvert), north (towards Gleason Parkway) and east (into the Hackamore Circle / Hunter Road existing development). o Increased Hackamore drainage enters the site as part of the Hackamore Road project being constructed cooperatively with Medina. A portion of this runoff will be treated within this development. 20. Site plans shall identify stormwater access routes to the ponds and all features of the stormwater management system. 21. All drainage swales shall maintain a minimum of 2% slope and all slopes should be 4:1 or flatter unless approved by the city engineer. 22. If filtration is required by ECWMC for the site, the City strongly prefers a NURP pond with filter bench (offset to one side of the pond) be used with adequate maintenance access. The filter bench design is efficient from land use and requires less future maintenance as compared to other treatment options. 23. Due to the rural nature of Corcoran conveyance systems, offsite receiving waters will be evaluated to understand any impacts from additional drainage. 24. The Concept Plan shows several small sand filtration systems which appear to have challenges with access and are problematic for frequent maintenance. These systems should be consolidated with the larger stormwater system. Floodplain 25. A Letter of Map Revision was finalized by FEMA in January of 2023, which partially encompassed this property. As part of this revision, the floodplain within the development was better defined which created 1.78 acres additional upland within this development. A figure showing the previous and revised floodplain boundaries within this area is provided in Attachment A. July 2023 Hackamore/116 NE Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 3 Water 26. The site plan identifies watermain connections at the SW corner of the development and a watermain stub to the SE of the Hackamore/116 NE project which is presumed to be connected to the watermain in Ravinia. 27. During the design of the Hackamore Road Project, the Lakeview Development team asked the City to review the watermain requirements for this proposed development. This review is typically performed with a feasibility study but the developer requested this work to better understand if looping of the watermain to the east would be required. The review of the watermain system is included as Attachment A. The analysis identified that a looped water system with two connection points is necessary to adequately support this development. 28. A corridor for a future water connection along Hackamore Road was identified with the roadway project and is being preserved. 29. If Street C remains as a cul-de-sac, the watermain should be looped. Sewer 30. At the time of the feasibility study, the sanitary sewer connection locations will be reviewed to identify potential corridors which could be utilized to construct the system in accordance with City standards. Attachment A Hackamore Drainage Anoka County Carver County Dakota County Hennepin County McLeod County Ramsey County WashingtonCountyWright County !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1314 15 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 3435 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 6263 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 8182 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 456710 4567101 4567116 456747 4567101 456710 4567101 4567116 4567116 Berg a m o n t D rHunterRdSnyder RdCSAH 101Bass Lake Rd Old S ettlers Rd Larkin Rd Abilene La Ol d S e t t l e r s R d A r r o w h e a d D rCSAH 10 Troy LaHackamore Rd Brockton La NCR-116Gleason Rd Larkin Rd BlueBonnetDrCR-116Larkin Rd 971.7 971.5 973.4 986.4 963.3 973.4 973.4 986.6 986.4 984.8 987.9 Notes Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title ($$¯V:\2277\active\227701010\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\corcoran\corcoran_arh.aprx Revised: 2023-02-24 By: ahyamsLegend Existing 1% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary Proposed 1% Annual Chance Floodplain Boundary Parcels Inundated by Floodplain Both Existing Proposed Page 1 of 1 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources Include: Hennepin County, MnDOT, FEMA 3. Orthophotography: Hennepin County 2021 Aerial 4. Vertical Datum: NAVD88 1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17) 0 250 500 Feet Prepared by ARH on 2023-02-24 T119N, R23W, S25 & S35-S36 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 227701010 City of Corcoran FEMA LOMR Application Corcoran Floodplain Revisions 1 973.8 = 1% HWL Attachment B Floodplain Memo To: Kevin Mattson City of Corcoran From: Louis Sigtermans, PE Camila Bejarano, EIT Minneapolis Project/File: 193806038 Date: March 6, 2023 Reference: Lakeview Development - Water Modeling Analysis Objective At the request of the Lakeview Development team, the City of Corcoran reviewed the water modeling for a potential residential development at the northeast corner of Hackamore Road and County Road 116. The site is currently farmland that would be developed as 70 single-family residential units. Stantec performed a WaterCAD model analysis to evaluate three water distribution scenarios to serve this development. This memo documents the assumptions, results and analysis of each scenario, and conclusions. Model Assumptions Stantec started with the existing model WaterCAD model with modifications to key scenario parameters as described below. Pipe Network: · New 8-inch water main within and connecting to the proposed development, varying by scenario (refer to Figure 1 attached). Scenarios are described below. · Node elevations within the proposed development were obtained from the ground floor (GF) elevations on the provided concept plan. Demands: · Average Day: o 20,160 gallons per day (gpd) average day demand was calculated for 70 single-family residential units. o Total system demand: 0.63 million gallons per day (MGD). · Maximum Day: o 60,480 gpd maximum day demand was calculated for 70 single-family residential units o Total system maximum day demand: 1.79 MGD. Maple Grove Supply: · Hydraulic grade elevation: 1098 ft MSL March 6 Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 4 Reference: Lakeview Development Water Modeling Analysis Fire Flow: · Fire flow residual pressure cut off: 20 psi Scenarios The modeling consisted of three steady-state scenarios to evaluate average day and peak hour pressures and maximum day fire flows within the proposed Lakeview Development. The pipes assumed for each scenario are shown on the figure attached to this memo (Figure 1). Below is a summary of each scenario. 1. 8-inch watermain connected to the 8-inch stub located at the intersection of County Road (CR) 116 and Hackamore Road (J-C25), and a second 8-inch watermain connected to the 12-inch stub at intersection with Hackamore Road and Steeple Chase Lane (J-C20). 8-inch watermain with no internal loops. (Pipe 1 on and Pipes 2-4 off) 2. 8-inch watermain connected to J-C25 and a second 8-inch watermain connected to J-C24 at the Tavera Development. 8-inch watermain with no internal loops. (Pipe 2 on and Pipes 1, 3 and 4 off) 3. 8-inch watermain connected to J-C25 and a second 8-inch watermain connected to J-C20. Two 8- inch internal loops were added to this scenario to eliminate dead ends. (Pipes 1, 3 and 4 on and Pipe 2 off) Results Available Fire Flow Table 1 shows the maximum day fire flow results for each scenario at the nodes within the proposed development. Table 1. Maximum Day Available Fire Flow Results (gpm) Label Elevation (ft) Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 J-LV1 1,005.0 811 855 1,025 J-LV2 1,007.5 811 835 1,008 J-LV3 1,014.5 696 702 954 J-LV4 1,006.5 871 848 1,007 J-LV5 1,000.5 1,071 872 1,097 J-LV6 1,005.5 1,057 860 1,052 J-LV7 1,003.5 1,160 840 1,187 J-LV8 1,002.5 1,122 885 1,108 Available fire flow for low density residential is typically recommended to be at least 1,000 gpm. Based on the results from the WaterCAD modeling, fire flow for Scenario 1 ranged from 650-1,200 gpm, with 696 gpm March 6 Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 4 Reference: Lakeview Development Water Modeling Analysis being the lowest fire flow located at the dead-end main (J-LV3) within the proposed development. Fire flows for Scenario 2 ranged between 800 and 900 gpm, with 702 gpm being the lowest fire flow. Scenario 1 resulted in improved available fire flows over Scenario 2 (by approximately 100-250 depending on the node). It is important to note that two dead-ends were modeled for both scenarios. Dead-ends typically experience lower available fire flows. Available fire flows improved for all nodes, exceeding 1,000 gpm, under Scenario 3. The node J-LV3 was the exception, with the lowest fire flow of 954 gpm. All pipes were looped, and no dead-ends were modeled. Pressure Table 2 shows the average day pressure results for each scenario at the nodes within the proposed development. Table 2. Average Day Pressure Results (psi) Label Elevation (ft) Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 J-LV1 1,005.0 40 40 40 J-LV2 1,007.5 39 39 39 J-LV3 1,014.5 36 36 36 J-LV4 1,006.5 39 39 39 J-LV5 1,000.5 42 42 42 J-LV6 1,005.5 40 40 40 J-LV7 1,003.5 41 40 41 J-LV8 1,002.5 41 41 41 Municipal water systems are typically designed with a minimum pressure of 35 psi at all locations in the service area under normal operating conditions. Based on the results from the WaterCAD modeling, all the nodes within the residential development had an average day pressure more than 35 psi. The lowest pressure was 36 psi located at J-LV3. The results for peak hour pressures were also relatively similar between all scenarios. Pressures ranged from 24-32 psi, with 24 psi being the lowest pressure at J-LV3. It is important to note that this node is located at the highest ground elevation compared to all other nodes. Conclusions Available fire flows within the potential development are anticipated to be less than 1,000 gpm if dead-end mains are implemented (Scenarios 1 and 2). In general, available fire flows at most nodes are higher under Scenario 1 than Scenario 2. If minimum available fire flows near 1,000 gpm are desired at all nodes, Scenario 3 is recommended. Internal looping provides the added benefit of limiting potential stagnant water within mains due to low demands. March 6 Kevin Mattson Page 4 of 4 Reference: Lakeview Development Water Modeling Analysis Based on the results, all the nodes within the residential development are expected to maintain the recommended minimum pressure of 35 psi at all locations during average day conditions. The proposed residential development would experience static pressures less than 35 psi during the peak hour demand period because the development is located at a high ground elevation. To improve this, either implementation of the SE Water System booster pump station and storage tank would be required, or these locations could be considered for individual home booster pumps. Please feel free contact me if you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Louis Sigtermans PE (MN) Environmental Engineer Direct: (612) 895-5022 louis.sigtermans@stantec.com Attachment: Figure 1 !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Hackamore RdHackamore Rd 63rd Ave N HunterRdParkTrailDrH unterLa BergamontDrFoxber ryDrPinto DrCR-116Pipe 4Pipe 3 Pipe 2 Pipe 1 J-C20 J-LV1 J-LV2 J-LV3 J-LV4 J-LV5 J-LV6 J-LV7 J-LV8 J-C25 J-R24 J-R25 J-T1 J-T2 J-T3 J-T4 J-C24 J-T24 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\1938\Active\193806038\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\watercadmodelingmemo\watercadmodelingmemo.aprx Revised: 2023-03-03 By: ahyamsLegend Hennepin County Parcels Proposed 8-inch Connection 8-inch Diameter Watermain 12-inch Diameter Watermain !(Nodes Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin Feet 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2021 Imagery (At original document size of 8.5x11) 1:6,000 0 250 500 Feet Prepared by BS on 2023-03-03 T119N, R23W, S36 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 193806038 City of Corcoran Lakeview Development Water Evaluation Proposed Watermain Scenarios 1 Anoka County Carver County Hennepin County Wright County Stormwater Guidelines for Development March 2019 Issue Cities changing from rural to urban development are challenged by the additional stormwater generated due to construction of impervious surfaces, along with the offsite infrastructure, or lack thereof, to manage effectively. To standardize the modeling and review process, the guidelines below were created for efficiency. Note: A watershed approval is required per Elm Creek WMO rules, which also reviews flow rates, water quality and volume management. Modeling Watershed Information · Provide an aerial photo of the development that includes the overall watershed and subwatershed boundaries · Provide a summary of the acreage to each discharge point leaving the site. Any increase (or decrease) shall be identified. · Show any floodplain adjacent to project or within the project · Show downstream water bodies and flow paths o Downstream flow paths and water bodies typically need to have elevations, inverts, and condition identified. Subwatersheds A HydroCAD model (typically used) has inputs that can vary by user. To minimize resubmittals, review time and effort, the following data shall be utilized. · Electronic model shall be submitted · Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) shall be lowered one category due to the mass grading and compaction of the soils. For example, an existing B soil, shall be modeled as a proposed C soil (unless it remains undisturbed) · Wetlands, filtration basins, and ponds shall be modeled at CN of 98 · Identify peak rates for storm events and proposed shall be equal or less than existing rates. o Note: There are certain conditions where at City’s discretion the off-site conditions require a reduction in flow rate from existing rates. · SWMM (i.e. EPA-, XP-, or PC-) models can be submitted for review, however these increase review time. Model Setup for Outlet Control Structures, NWLs and Infiltration · The model’s flow control structures (OCS, culverts, etc.) shall match the construction plan information. During the plan and model review both may be modified and revised · Individual detail plates are required for each OCS, and individual plates shall have inverts identified · A pond or wetland NWL (and model starting elevation) shall be set at the constructed outlet control elevation. o No live storage shall be utilized below the controlling OCS elevation. o No live storage shall be used for filtration shelves on ponds below controlling OCS elevation · If a pond or wetland has an NWL (wet surface), infiltration shall not be used in flood routing. · If a pond has filtration BMP causing drawdown below the NWL, this drawdown elevation shall not be used as the NWL for flood routing. (Filtration has a slower release time and during wet periods is not available as live storage). Construction Plans Catch Basins · Street drainage shall be sufficient to manage the 10-year event · Typical a CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly · Three inches (0.25 feet) of head on a CB will inundate a street centerline (2% slope). · Spacing is 200 to 250 feet using longitudinal street dimensions of 40 feet from road centerline to half the house footprint (assumes rear half of house drains to rear yard). Dimensions equal 10,000 SF. · CBs may be required on both sides of ped ramps to capture flows Natural Drainage Features · Waterbodies receiving urban drainage (wetlands, ditches, gullies) may need to have OCS installed, erosion protection, or reduced flow rates to allow the feature to function over the long term due to more consistent flows from increased impervious via development · Offsite work may be necessary and City will assist with coordination, easements, etc. HWLs and EOFs · The freeboard requirements are: o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the HWL o Low Opening is a minimum of two feet above the EOF · EOFs shall be accurately shown and as builts are required. The highest point shall be the EOF (for example top of curb) since this is the controlling elevation o In certain instances, channel calculations of the swale may be required to show the EOF has capacity to manage estimated flow · Overland EOFs are preferred, however if a second pipe serves as an EOF then modeling will include a 100-year event using the second pipe (EOF) as the only outlet (primary outlet plugged). Rear Yards · Rear yards or swales less than 2% shall have draintile. Typically, every two to three lots will require rear yard CBs. Sump Connections · Houses adjoining a wetland or pond do not need individual sump connection · Others will have access to rear yard stormsewer. Offsite Impacts Adjacent Parcels · City will review adjacent parcels (downstream and upstream) for impacts from volume, point discharge, etc. and may require off site improvements. City will assist in coordination of any off site work. · Off site water quality improvement projects may be determined by the City for assistance with compliance with City’s TMDL approach of implementing improvements upon development. · FEMA modifications may be necessary due to development and implemented by City. Page 1 of 7 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 8b. City Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Nicholas Ouellette through Kendra Lindahl Topic: Sketch Plan for Kariniemi Jensen at 20400 County Road 30 (city file 23-004) Action Required: Feedback Review Deadline: August 26, 2023 1. Request The applicant, Nate Kariniemi, is requesting an opportunity to appear before the City Council to solicit informal comments on a sketch plan for a proposed subdivision of the parcel located at 20400 County Road 30 (PID 11-119-23-21-0002). The proposal includes subdividing the property into 16 single family residential lots on the south side of the site with a large outlot on the north half of the site proposed as open space. 2. Analysis The applicant has submitted a narrative and sketch plan detailing the proposed Open Space & Preservation (OS&P) plat subdivision. The sketch plan shows 16 rural residential lots and one outlot. The sketch plan process provides an opportunity for the applicant to get information from the City that can be incorporated into a formal development application. The next steps would be: 1.Application for Open Space and Preservation Preliminary Plat 2.Application for Final Plat (and development contract) Page 2 of 7 Context Zoning and Land Use The property is guided Rural/Ag Residential and zoned Rural Residential (RR). The site is located outside of the 2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary. Surrounding Properties The properties to the east of the site are zoned Urban Reserve (UR) district and guided Existing Residential and Mixed Residential in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Properties to the north, south and west are zoned Rural Residential (RR) district and guided Rural/Ag Residential in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The present use of the surrounding properties appears to be agricultural and single family residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Natural Resources Inventory Areas Map identifies emergent and shrub wetland natural plant communities in addition to upland savanna/pasture plant communities along the perimeter of the wetland. There appear to be large mature trees on site, particularly surrounding the wetland and in the southwest corner of the parcel. Sketch Plan Development Rights The 81.03-acre site has eight development rights. An OS&P plat with urban street sections is allowed to develop the site at 200% of the development rights which would allow for a total of 16 development rights. The proposed development would exhaust all available development rights for the property. The plan shows one outlot 52.4 acres in size without a development right. This property is intended to be preserved until municipal sanitary sewer and water become available to service the site and the property could then be further subdivided. There are several agricultural buildings on-site situated around the single family residence. The applicant has not indicated that any existing structures on-site will be preserved. There are existing agricultural buildings located within the proposed right-of- way that must be demolished. The single family residence is located on proposed Lot 10, Block 1. It is possible the residential structure could remain; however, additional details will be required to ensure the building and lot comply with the ordinance standards. The existing accessory structures on proposed Lots 9 and 10, Block 1 may remain only if they do not exceed the accessory structure allowance permitted on the new lot. Page 3 of 7 Open Space and Preservation Plat (OS&P) An OS&P plat is necessary to increase the development rights to allow 16 single family lots on the property as shown on the sketch plan. The gross acreage of the proposed OS&P plat is 81.03 acres. Under an OS&P plat a minimum of 50% of the gross land area must be dedicated as preserved open space and of the 50% gross land dedicated for open space, no less than 50% of the area shall be upland area (i.e. 25% of the net area). The sketch plan appears to show compliance with the open space requirements; however, without a wetland delineation we are unable to determine if the dedicated upland area complies with the minimum upland area required. A ghost plat is required with a formal application and should show how the upland area could be developed and accessed in the future if sewer and water become available to the site. The required open space is being provided in a single, contiguous outlot. The outlot area includes emergent wetland, shrub wetland and savanna/pasture upland plant communities as identified in the Natural Resource Inventory map from the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has indicated that the open space outlot will be privately owned and that it will continue to be used as crop land and maintained through typical conservation and agricultural practices. The applicant has expressed flexibility for future ownership of the outlot to meet the City’s preference. The applicant is proposing to increase the existing eight development rights into 16 development rights by utilizing the 200% density bonus available for OS&P plats that develop with an urban street section. Proposed Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 1 are proximal to the wetland where significant trees that comprise the savanna/pasture are located. Development on these lots may impact the savanna/pasture plant communities. The objective of the OS&P as stated in the ordinance is to preserve the natural resource areas identified by the Comprehensive Plan. The arrangement of residential lots could possibly be reorganized to reduce the potential impact on existing natural communities. - The Council should provide direction. Page 4 of 7 Lot Standards The sketch plan appears to show compliance with the Rural Residential district lot standards, which requires the following minimum standards: OS&P Lot Area 4 acres (maximum) Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet Front, From all other streets 25 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 25 feet Side 10 feet Rear 25 feet Adjacent to Residential n/a Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage n/a * Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan The proposed residential lots range in area from 1.0- to 2.2-acres in size and should be able to comply with the lot dimension and setback standards. Utilities The entire site is situated outside the MUSA and will be served with well and septic. As noted above, there is no minimum lot size. The applicant must provide information with the preliminary plat that shows primary and secondary septic sites can fit on each individual lot. It may be challenging to find two viable septic sites per lot and leave adequate space for a residential structure. If a centralized wastewater treatment system is proposed a PUD shall be required. The Comprehensive Plan Proposed Sanitary Sewer System map shows a future trunk sewer system alignment along east property line. The City Engineer’s memo notes that plans shall identify future corridors for public sewer and water utilities. Wetlands There is at least one large wetland on the site. The applicant must submit a wetland delineation for review and approval by the City. If wetland impacts are proposed additional applications for mitigation would be required. The applicant must comply with the wetland buffer and setback requirements in Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. If existing vegetation is proposed to be used as wetland buffers, these areas shall be reviewed by the City to determine if the existing vegetation is acceptable. Page 5 of 7 Floodplain The site includes a large area of floodplain that appears to coincide with the location of the large wetland. As part of a formal submittal, the plans will need to indicate the areas that are considered floodway, flood fringe and general floodplain as defined in Section 1050.030 Subd. 3. Based on the revised boundaries of the districts covering the property, the corresponding standards from Section 1050.030 shall apply. Access There is an existing driveway providing access to the site from County Road 30. The applicant is proposing one access road to the site that aligns with intersection of Duffney Drive and County Road 30. The existing driveway access will be required to be removed. The City Engineer’s memo anticipates that turn lanes will be required into the site from County Road 30; however, the ultimate determination on access location and turn lanes will be made by Hennepin County. Lots within the development have access from two cul-de-sac roads with a 66-foot right- of-way. The cul-de-sac roads are approximately 575 feet and 875 feet in length and do not exceed maximum permitted length for cul-de-sacs. It is assumed that the northern cul-de-sac may be extended further north to create additional roadway connections in the future when the outlot is developed. The internal “T” intersection could also be reconfigured to a “cross” intersection that provides future connectivity to the parcel to the east. Trails and Sidewalks The Parks and Trails plan in the Comprehensive Plan identifies a proposed off-road trail that runs along the perimeter of the wetland through the site and an existing on-road trail along County Road 30. The concept plan shows the approximate location of the off-road trail through the site and is situated within Outlot A. The proposed off- road trail ultimately connects to a City owned parcel west of the site at 10030 Cain Road. A trail easement must be provided for staff review with a formal preliminary plat application. The City could discuss the location of the trail and possible access points throughout the site. Stormwater The City Engineer’s memo provides detailed comments on stormwater for the proposed sketch plan. A stormwater management plan will be required with a preliminary plat to ensure compliance with City and Watershed standards for stormwater. Page 6 of 7 OS&P Residential Design Objectives Residential OS&P developments should be designed to achieve as many of the following objectives provided in Section 940.050, Subd. 1(F) of the Subdivision Ordinance. It is not clear whether the sketch plan has achieved any of the objectives; however, Council may consider encouraging the applicant to achieve any number of the following objectives. 1. Arrange lots around a central focal point such as: a. A central green, boulevard or square. b. A physical amenity such as a meadow, a strand of trees, a stream or water body, or some other natural feature. 2. Locate lots such that at least 50% of the lots within a neighborhood abut open space, or other amenity, on at least one side. 3. Preserve views from each building unit and from off-site vantage points to the maximum possible. 4. Locate neighborhood recreational open spaces such that they are an integral part of the neighborhood, are suitable for the projected demographic makeup of residents, are at an elevation appropriate to their intended recreational use, have boundaries that are clearly defined and are accessible to all neighborhood residents from a public street or trail. Connect individual home sites with pedestrian corridors or sidewalks to larger open spaces and places of destination on-site and off-site. Open spaces should be accessible to pedestrians at roughly 1,200-foot intervals along public roadways. Pedestrian corridors between lots shall be at least 50 feet in width and buffered from view of adjacent properties. 5. Locate lots to preserve woodlands, farmland or other natural features or character, including places of historic, archeological or cultural value. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan to the maximum extent possible in a contiguous, connected configuration. Natural open spaces may include, but are not limited to, fields, wetlands, slopes, bluffs, woods, lakes, ponds, streams, shore lands, and other environmentally sensitive areas. 6. Provide covenants to create an architectural theme to include items such as landscaping, porches, side or rear loaded or detached garages. A written narrative describing the architectural theme shall be provided with the preliminary plat. 7. Locate houses and garages such that the garages do not dominate the streetscape. Page 7 of 7 8. Locate septic systems on the most suitable soils for subsurface septic disposal and in such manner as to provide for cost effective and least disruptive future connection of the wastewater treatment system(s) to urban services. 9. Landscape common areas and street rights-of-way with native vegetation with high wildlife conservation value. 3. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss the sketch plan and provide the applicant with informal comments. Any opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the City Council are considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. Attachments 1. Site Location Map 2. Sketch Plan dated July 13, 2023 3. Applicant’s Narrative dated June 27, 2023 4. City Engineer’s Memo dated July 17, 2023 5. Official Zoning Map 6. Parks and Trails Plan 7. Natural Resource Inventory Areas Map 8. Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer System Map (NE District) Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/18/2023 Comments: 1 inch = 800 feet PARCEL ID: 11119 23210 002 OWNER NAME: C M Jense n/C E Jen sen Trust PARCEL ADDRESS: 2 0400 C o Rd No 30,Corcoran MN 55374 PARCEL AREA: 7 9.4 9 acres, 3 ,46 2,499 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: SALE DATE: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2022, PAYABLE 2023 PRO PERTY TYPE: Farm H OMESTEAD: Ho me stead MARKET VALU E: $733,800 TAX TOTAL: $6,313.22 ASSESSED 2023, PAYABLE 2024 PROPERTY TYPE: Farm HOMESTEAD: Homeste ad MARKET VALUE: $807 ,40 0 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2023 12345 6 7 8 9 10 11 OUTLOT A PROPOSED ROAD 1 12 2 1 2 PROPOSED ROADCOUNTY ROAD NO. 30 3 13 N Feet 0 100 200 Project No. Revised:Checked By: Requested By: Date:Drawn By:Scale: Engineers & Land Surveyors, Inc. 9 West Division StreetBuffalo, MN 55313 (763)682-4727 Fax: (763)682-3522 www.ottoassociates.comdenotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron pipe set and marked by License #40062 denotes iron monument found SSOCIATES N Concept Plan Vicinity Map 6-1-23 Nathan Kariniemi T.J.B.1"=100'P.E.O. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. _______________________________ Paul E. Otto License #40062 Date:_____________ Revised l2l18/20 Please attach a brief description ofyour projcct/reason for your requcst. The applicant requests feedback on proposed os&p bonus development plat to utilize up to I development rights for up to 16 final lots. New access would be requested to be built coming off of CR 30. Open space is available to be reserved to meet the formula. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Kariniemi Jensen Concept Plan Review Date: July 17, 2023 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the Karieniemi --Jensen Concept Plan with the following documents; 1. Concept Plan for Nathan Kariniemi by Otto Associates revision dated 7-13-23 Comments: General: 1. Comments provided are high level comments based on the concept plan provided. Additional comments should be anticipated on future submittals that include more details of the development. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the proposed plans are subject to additional planning, zoning, Public Safety, and all other applicable codes and standards of the City of Corcoran, NPDES, ECWMC, Hennepin County, etc. Plat: 1. The applicant shall show all drainage and utility easements and all platting requirements are met per the City Code. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided per City requirements. 2. Easements should be provided over all infrastructure used for the maintenance, conveyance, and treatment of stormwater. 3. Easements should be provided over any/all public infrastructure as applicable. 4. Any existing easements should be provided to the City for review. Vacation of existing easements currently in place requires a City process and should be identified in the project schedule. Transportation 1. All roadways shall be constructed to City standards. If rural road sections are used, all pipe crossings and ditch drainage shall meet minimum City of Corcoran Standards. 2. It is anticipated that turn lanes from County Road 30 into this site will be required. Hennepin County controls the access and would make that ultimate determination. The developer shall be responsible for securing any offsite easements necessary to complete this work. 3. It is assumed that the northern turnaround adjacent to Outlot A may be extended north in the future to create additional roadway connections. 4. Proposed roadway ROW is shown at 66-feet. Final right of way width shall be reviewed at time of formal application. July 17, 2023 Kariniemi Jensen Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 5. Two lots to the west of this development have a small amount of upland available for future development. With this concept plan, no right of way is proposed to these lots which will require them to access from County Road 30 in the future. An extension of a right of way connection to the west should be reviewed. 6. Consider modifying the tee intersection within the development to a cross with an eastern ROW extension to create better road connectivity in the future. Stormwater 1. A stormwater management plan will be required for this development in accordance with City of Corcoran and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Standards. 2. Reference the City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines for Development Review for standards for stormwater systems and modeling. 3. FEMA floodplains are present in the northwest portion of this site. This floodplain shall be taken into consideration when developing the stormwater management plan for the site and all grading and site work shall be done in accordance with all applicable regulations for these floodplains. 4. Wetland delineations for this site shall be completed to confirm if and where wetlands are present within the site and follow WCA protocols. 5. The wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage shall be clearly identified and labeled. If existing vegetation is proposed to be used as wetland buffer, these areas shall be reviewed with the City of Corcoran wetland specialist to determine if they are viable candidates. 6. Site plans shall identify stormwater access routes to the ponds and all features of the stormwater management system. 7. All drainage swales shall maintain a minimum of 2% slope and all slopes should be 4:1 or flatter unless approved by the city engineer. 8. If filtration is required by ECWMC for the site, the City strongly prefers a NURP pond with filter bench (offset to one side of the pond) be used with adequate maintenance access. The filter bench design is efficient from land use and requires less future maintenance as compared to other treatment options. 9. The site discharges to the west, to the north to a large wetland complex and south through a presumed culvert across County Road 30. All discharge conveyance shall be provided by applicant. 10. Due to the rural nature of Corcoran conveyance systems, offsite receiving waters will be reviewed for any necessary improvements to manage the impacts from additional drainage from development. Water and Sewer 1. The parcel is out of the MUSA, therefore utilities will be provided by private well and septic systems. 2. The plans shall identify future corridors for public sewer and water. This corridor may need to be adjacent to the roadway since the timing of street reconstruction (typically 30 years) and utility availability may not be the same. The Comprehensive Sewer Plan shows the trunk sewer alignment directly east of this parcel which suggests the public infrastructure system could be available prior to road reconstruction when MCES makes more capacity available. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for verifying septic sites for the proposed development. End of Comments !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!! ! !!! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!î î î s s òñð òñð ñ ñ ï ï î î s ñ ï ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STIEG RD WILLOW DRIVEHACKAMORE ROADTRAIL HAVEN ROADCAIN ROADO A K D A L E D R STREHLER ROAD PIONEER TR COUNTY ROAD 117 ROLLLING HILLS RDLARKIN RD TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CITY OF GREENFIELDCITY OF MAPLE GROVESCOTT LAKEBECHTOLD ROAD$+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUSH CREEK Official Zoning Map 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Zoning Districts: UR Urban Reserve RR Rural Residential RSF-1 Single Family Residential 1 RSF-2 Single Family Residential 2 RSF-3 Single and Two Family Residential 3 RMF-1 Medium Density Residential RMF-2 Mixed Residential RMF-3 High Density Residential MP Manufactured Home Park P-I Public / Institutional TCR Transitional Rural Commercial CR Rural Commercial C-1 Neighborhood Commercial C-2 Community Commercial DMU Downtown Mixed Use GMU General Mixed Use BP Business District I-1 Light Industrial PUD Planned Unit Development ï Cemetery î ChurchsGolf Course ñ Government Building òñð Public Park !!!!!2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area City Limit Open Water Shoreland Overlay District Adopted June 2011 19 10 30 116 101 50 19 10 ± Updated September 2020 City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers %Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 County Road 116Oakdale Dr B r i d l e Pa t hJeffreyLnAbileneLnTrail LnHunters Rdg County Road 30HeatherLn Pio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Robert LnHor s eshoeBendD r Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w yWillow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19ES t Homestead Trl Maple Hill RdCain RdRolling Hills RdSundanceRdCountry Rd Mohawk DrElm StLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d County R oad 1 1 7 Stie g R d Bechtold RdKalk RdSchutte Rd Meister RdFoxValleyDr M y s t iq u e DrHageDr 93rd Ave N Sc hut t e P lBrandywineRdChisholmT r lTessmer Rd HighBluffLnWinchesterTrl JubertLnR u shC reekRushCreek CountyDitchN u m b e rS ixteenCo u n t y Ditch N u mberThreeSouthFor k R u s h C r e e k NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP 79 City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C reekRushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthForkR u sh C r eek2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Natural Resource Inventory Areas.mxd Date: 1/7/2019 Time: 1:10:39 PM User: ShuJC0243 ^_Natural Community !(Rare Species OccurenceHigh Quality Natural Community Natural Plant Communities WetlandsWet PrairieEmergentShrubFloodplain ForestOpen WaterFlood Plain (Reed Canary Dominant) UplandsSavanna/PastureMaple/BasswoodOak ForestDisturbed WoodlandOld FieldMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-7Natural Resource Inventory Areas Note: Due to limitations of map scale, distribution and proportion of NaturalCommunity types within each colored area are approximate.Source:Natural Plant Communities, Rare Species Occurence (Natural Resource Inventory andManagement Plan, Nov. 2001, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates) 27 !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H City of Maple GroveCity of Rogers DuffneyDrCounty Road 10 Hillside Dr Hunt ers R d g County Road 116Schutte Farm R d H id d e n PondsDr C herry LnRobertLnC ount y Road 30 J a c k ie L n Cain RdSchutte LnEbert RdCountry Rd Pat ric k PlLilyPondLnDarrellLnOswaldFarmRdOakdaleDr Dassel Ln Stie g R d ShannonLnS c hu t t e Rd Rush Meadow Ln My st ique Dr 93rd Ave N S u n n y Hill LnBrandywine RdRush Creek SouthForkRushCreek S o u th ForkRush C reekNE-M NE-S NE-C NE-A NE-B NE-D NE-G NE-H NE-L NE-E NE-JNE-I NE-F NE-N NE-T NE-K NE-R NE-V NE-U NE-O NE-Q NE-W NE-P SE-AP SE-AQ SE-AF 15''30''8''8''30''30''15''30''30''10' '8''10''10''12''15''30''30''12''15''6''30''30''30''NE-1 NE-2 NE-3 NE-4 NE-5 NE-6 NE-7 NE-8 NE-9 NE-10 NE-11 NE-12 NE-13 (LS) NE-14 NE-15 NE-16 NE-17 NE-18 Elm Creek Interceptor NE-19 NE-20 NE-21 NE-22 NE-23 456710 456730 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1,500 0 1,500750 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\NE Proposed Trunk Sanitary Sewer_LS.mxd Date: 1/8/2019 Time: 7:15:58 AM User: ShuJC0243!Proposed Gravity !Proposed Gravity (Lateral)Proposed Forcemain !H Sewer Nodes (LS) = Lift StationSewer SubdistrictsMunicipal Boundary2040 MUSAParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 7-2Proposed Trunk SanitarySewer System - NE District 115 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 9a. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Three Rivers Park District Cooperative Agreement Action Required: Direction Summary As part of the process to create the Diamond Lake Regional Trail, the City has been working closely with the Three Rivers Park District to develop a cooperative agreement between the two organizations. The purpose of the agreement is to determine how reimbursement for land, responsibilities of parties, etc. is managed between the City of Corcoran and Three Rivers Park District with regards to the Diamond Lake Regional Trail. The Parks and Trails Commission, provided feedback regarding the City Park Remaster and the building of the trail on City parcel. Staff has sent those comments to the City Attorney and Three Rivers Park District and will present minor changes if needed. Upon City adoption, the agreement would be presented on August 17 to the Three Rivers Park District Board. Financial/Budget The agreement outlines a credit to the City for Three Rivers Park District trail sections as they exceed the City’s eight-foot standard trail width. For future sections of trail, the City, Three Rivers Park District would reimburse for the trail easement acquisition. Options 1. Direct staff execute the process the Diamond Lake Regional Trail Cooperative Agreement. 2. Direct staff execute the process the Diamond Lake Regional Trail Cooperative Agreement with amendments. 3. Direct staff to proceed in a different manner. Recommendation Direct staff execute the process the Diamond Lake Regional Trail Cooperative Agreement. Council Action Direct staff execute the process the Diamond Lake Regional Trail Cooperative Agreement. Attachments 1. Diamond Lake Regional Trail Cooperative Agreement. May 25, 2022 - SS 1 CITY OF CORCORAN AND THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT DIAMOND LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________ 2023, by and between the Three Rivers Park District, a body corporate and politic and a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (“Park District”), and the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”). WHEREAS, Park District is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota authorized by statute to acquire, establish, operate, and maintain park facilities and regional trail systems; and WHEREAS, City and Park District support the expansion of the regional trail system within the City, and specifically, the Diamond Lake Regional Trail (“Regional Trail”) corridor connecting Baker Park Reserve and West Mississippi River Regional Trail; and WHEREAS, Park District in partnership with the City prepared a master plan for the development of the Regional Trail based on the route conceptually approved by the City on July 22, 2021; and WHEREAS, the City has approved a resolution of support for the master plan on June 23, 2022; and WHEREAS, acquisition and development opportunities within the City are imminent and require timely collaboration between the City and Park District to capitalize on opportunities as they present themselves; and WHEREAS, Park District and City desire to cooperate to acquire property rights, design, construct, operate and maintain the regional trail within the City, each employing their own powers. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, City and Park District agree as follows: A.Regional Trail Route and Status. The approved conceptual Regional Trail route is shown on Exhibit A. Both parties agree minor changes in the final Regional Trail route are allowable in order to best capitalize on opportunities to secure land, develop the trail, create a high quality Regional Trail corridor, be fiscally responsible, or similar. City Administrator or designee and Park District Superintendent or designee shall have authority to approve minor changes to the regional trail corridor route. Substantial changes in the route must be approved by both parties and may require a public engagement process. B.Property Rights. City shall acquire and convey to Park District permanent property rights for purposes of establishing a continuous and contiguous Regional Trail corridor where Park District does not already have rights in place. Regional Trail corridor shall be a minimum width of 20 feet unless otherwise agreed upon. Attachment: 9a1. May 25, 2022 - SS 2 City may fulfill this responsibility through public trailway easements, fee title, or permanent irrevocable permit or any combination thereof (individually and collectively referred to hereafter as ‘Easement’) provided that a permanent irrevocable permit and license shall only be used in situations where City does not have property rights sufficient to convey fee title or an easement but does have the legal authority to construct, maintain, and operate sidewalks, trails, and other such public ways within the permit area. Non-fee title property rights (i.e. easements and permits) conveyance documents shall generally adhere to typical public trailway easement and permanent irrevocable permit (in the general form attached hereto as Exhibit B) unless otherwise agreed upon by both parties. In the event City acquires property rights from private parties to fulfill this obligation, Park District will reimburse City for acquired property rights. Reimbursement shall be limited to the amount paid for the property rights or to the amount the City would have received in the event cash in lieu of land was used to meet park dedication requirements provided however, that the reimbursement amount is supported by an MAI appraisal approved by the Park District and funded equally by the parties and that the reimbursement amount is deemed reasonable by the Park District before the property rights are obtained. City shall be responsible for any other acquisition costs. Park District shall not be responsible to reimburse City for acquisition of property rights it already holds, except as identified in Section D of this AgreementPark District shall not be obligated to proceed with any obligation under this Agreement except to reimburse City for agreed upon property rights reimbursement expenses until City has conveyed to Park District an Easement sufficient to create continuous and contiguous regional trail corridor. Park District shall reimburse City the amount paid for property rights within 180 days of notice by City, unless otherwise agreed upon. Park District may at its sole discretion also acquire property rights for purposes of creating a continuous and contiguous regional trail corridor from willing sellers. In such cases, City shall approve via resolution Park District’s acquisition of property rights so long as the acquisition is consistent with the approved route as shown on Exhibit A, or is otherwise acceptable to City. In the event City’s right to so maintain a regional trail is lost by City-initiated action which results in the vacation, condemnation, or revocation of license or permit (such action a “City Loss of Use”), City will acquire such additional rights, titles and interests as are needed to provide a continuous and contiguous regional trail corridor at City expense. If the City Loss of Use occurs after construction of the regional trail, the City shall reconstruct the regional trail, if necessary, at City expense, subject to credit for any compensation Park District may receive for loss of its regional trail. In locations where the City meets its Easement responsibilities via an irrevocable permit and license, the City represents that it currently has or will obtain the legal right and authority to construct, maintain, and operate Regional Trail within the permit area. The parties recognize that certain Trail segments and road/railroad crossings may require agreements with third parties such as the Minnesota Department of Transportation (“MnDOT”). The parties to this Agreement shall cooperate to secure necessary permissions to use such crossings and bridges. In the event that May 25, 2022 - SS 3 necessary permissions cannot be secured, this Agreement may be terminated by either party provided that monies due to either party is first paid. C. Design and Construction. Design and construction of the Regional Trail and associated structures and road crossings shall be in accordance with the Regional Trail Standard Details (Exhibit C) and standards and guidelines adopted by the Park District. The Park District will have final discretion over Regional Trail and safe crossing design and the interpretation and execution of engineering best practices. i. Design and Construction by Park District. The Park District will coordinate and fund design of Regional Trail and related structures. Park District may, in its sole discretion, contract with consultants to provide professional design services including, but not limited to design development, bidding documents, construction plans and specifications, contract document preparation, construction administration, and project close out. Park District shall submit all Regional Trail plans to City for review and approval, provided however, that approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Park District shall be responsible for bidding and construction of the Regional Trail and related structures in accordance with approved construction plans and specifications. Construction shall commence following (1) conveyance to Park District of Easements in accordance with Paragraph B – Property Rights of this Agreement, (2) Park District and City approval of plans and specifications for the Regional Trail, and (3) project funding approval by Park District Board of Commissioners. ii. Design and Construction by City. In the alternative, City may design and construct the Regional Trail and related structures at Park District expense if first approved by Park District. If such a request is approved by the Park District, in its sole discretion, City shall assume all responsibilities associated with design and construction of Regional Trail and related structures, including, but not limited to design development, bidding documents, construction plans and specifications, contract document preparation, construction administration, and project closeout. City may do no work on the Regional Trail or related structures until it has submitted all Regional Rrail plans, including substantial changes, to Park District for review and has received approval from Park District. Park District will delegate authority to approve substantial changes to appropriate staff. Approvals shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the City’s request to design and construct the Regional Trail and related structures is approved by the Park District, City shall be responsible for bidding and construction of the Regional Trail and related structures in accordance with the Park District approved construction plans and specifications. Bids shall utilize unit costs where possible unless otherwise agreed to. City shall be responsible for construction administration including but not limited to construction supervision. City shall provide notice to Park District of the commencement of Regional Trail construction. Park District may observe construction and may consult with City regarding construction issues. City shall inform the Park District of final construction and shall schedule inspection by all parties and other appropriate agencies prior to closing the construction contract. Upon correction of any concerns identified in the inspections, City shall notify Park District in writing indicating completion of the project. Upon completion and once determined to be regionally significant as defined in May 25, 2022 - SS 4 Paragraph H, Park District shall assume Park District operations and maintenance responsibilities under this Agreement. Park District may, at its reasonable discretion, temporarily withhold reimbursement for construction costs as provided by this Agreement for construction of the Regional Trail and related structures completed prior to Park District issuance of Notice to Proceed to City. Park District will issue a Notice to Proceed following (1) conveyance to Park District of Easements in accordance with Paragraph B – Property Rights of this Agreement, (2) Park District approval of construction plans, specifications, and costs for Regional Trail and related structures, and (3) project funding approval by the Park District’s Board of Commissioners. Park District shall reimburse City for direct costs of design services incurred by the City to design the Regional Trail and related structures and construction paid or owed to the contractor engaged by City to build the Regional Trail and related structures if first approved by the Park District. The Park District and City will establish maximum reimbursement for design and construction of the Regional Trail and related structures upon City’s request to assume said responsibilities. The balance of Regional Trail and related structures costs related to design and construction shall be the responsibility of City. Park District will not reimburse City for indirect City costs incurred by City including, but not limited to, staff costs, costs of consultants and advisors, legal fees, or any other expense, which do not represent direct approved design or construction costs, including without limitation filing and permit fees, except as provided herein. In the event the City uses its own forces to design and administer the construction of the Regional Trail and related structures, the City may seek reimbursement for direct and reasonable staff costs if first approved by the Park District. City shall provide all records necessary for audit of costs. Reimbursement shall not be due until 1) City has conveyed required Easement to Park District in accordance with Paragraph B – Property Rights of this Agreement, 2) Park District approves the construction plans and specifications, and 3) Regional Trail and related structures are constructed in accordance with the Park District approved construction plans and specification. Park District shall reimburse City within thirty (30) days following receipt of verified statement of direct design and construction expenses for all costs authorized by this Paragraph. D. Tavera, Rush Creek, Bellwether and Amberly Developments. The City or its designee shall be responsible for the design and construction of the segments through housing developments indicated in Table A below and depicted in Exhibit A. Design and construction will strictly adhere to the terms and conditions of Paragraph C(ii): Design and Construction by City except as provided herein. These trail segments were designed and/or built prior to the execution of this Agreement, however, they were designed and/or built with the intent of becoming part of the Regional Trail. On behalf of the Park District’s best interests, the City worked to ensure compliance with the master planning work, final agreed upon route by both parties, Park District Regional Trail standards, and Park District design review feedback. As such the Park District shall reimburse the City $3.40 per linear foot which covers the additional cost of upgrading the City’s planned 8’ wide local trails to meet the 10’ wide Regional May 25, 2022 - SS 5 Trail standards. Table A. Segment Development Name Approx. Length Compensation Amount A Amberly 1500 ft. $ 5,100 B Bellwether 4600 ft. $ 15,650 C Rush Creek 2150 ft. $ 7,400 D Tavera 7900 ft. $ 26,850 Reimbursement from the Park District shall occur in 2024 for completed trail segments. Reimbursement for trail segments which have not been completed as of the date of this Agreement shall occur in the calendar year following completion of each subsequent segment provided the City provides at least 6 months’ notice of its intent to seek reimbursement to allow for budgeting. The City shall be solely responsible for any and all additional costs to complete the trail upgrades contemplated in this Section D. E. Existing Local Trail Conveyance. Upon Park District request, the City will convey ownership of existing local trail segments along the Regional Trail corridor to the Park District. The City may also request that the Park District assume ownership of existing local trail segments; however, the Park District shall have no obligation to accept ownership until the existing local trail is regionally significant as defined in Paragraph H. F. Permits and Assessments. City shall not unreasonably withhold City approvals, City permits, and other official City permissions necessary for the Park District to operate, maintain, reconstruct and construct the Regional Trail. In consideration of the Park District’s performance under this Agreement including its maintenance obligations, City hereby agrees that the Park District shall not be subject to assessment by the City pertaining to the installation or maintenance of trailway improvements made on the lands included in, or adjacent to, the Regional Trail corridor. G. Inconsistent Rights. The City, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby covenants that it will not construct nor grant others the right to construct any structures or improvements within the Easement areas, which are inconsistent with the rights and interests herein granted to Park District. H. Operation and Maintenance. i. Operations and Maintenance by City or Designee. The City or designee shall be solely responsible to operate and maintain the Regional Trail until such time as the Regional Trail or segments of the Regional Trail become regionally significant. For purposes of this Agreement, the Regional Trail shall become regionally significant at which time roughly half or more of the visitation is from people living outside of Corcoran, the trail directly connects to existing regional park/trail destinations such as Baker Park Reserve, or the contiguous/continuous trail length outside of Baker Park Reserve equals or exceeds three miles. City’s operation and maintenance responsibilities include all routine and preventative maintenance and repair of the Regional Trail and all improvements to ensure the pavement remains in safe, good working order and open for public use. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties agree that May 25, 2022 - SS 6 the City will have no obligation to perform winter maintenance, to include without limitation snow removal, even if the Regional Trail remains open during winter months. ii. Operations and Maintenance by Park District. At which time the Regional Trail or segments of the Regional Trail become regionally significant as outlined above, Park District and its agents and licensees shall have the sole and exclusive right and authority to operate and control the Regional Trail and to establish rules and regulations governing its use to the extent not in conflict with ordinances of the City. Park District will be responsible for the renovation, replacement, repair, maintenance, and upkeep of the Regional Trail except bridges, tunnels and other structures owned by others, and as provided in Section H(i). Park District shall be solely responsible for establishing maintenance standards for the Regional Trail, which will be consistent district wide. Park District reserves the right to remove any vegetation or object that obstructs the use or safety of the Regional Trail including adjacent safety zones in accordance with Exhibit C – Typical Trail Section. I. Trail Uses and Purposes. Regional Trail shall be open to the general public and be used exclusively for outdoor recreation and commuter activities, including but not limited to non-motorized uses such as walking, jogging, skating, and biking. The use of electric-assisted bicycles as defined in Minnesota State Law and Other Power Limited Mobility Devices as defined by the American with Disabilities Act and in accordance with Park District Policy are permitted. In addition, motor vehicles used by the City or Park District for maintenance, law enforcement or other public uses will be permitted on the Regional Trail. Routine maintenance and patrol with motor vehicles will be conducted from adjacent roadways where feasible. J. Winter Use. As of the date of this Agreement, Park District policy is to leave the Regional Trail open to the public in winter, but perform no winter maintenance. Park District reserves the right to operate and maintain the Regional Trail for winter use in its sole discretion. The City may request a Park District Winter Use Permit to operate and maintain the Regional Trail during winter months. Such permit will require City, among other things, to assume responsibility for trail maintenance, operation and liabilities associated with winter use. K. Signage. The Park District shall be responsible to furnish, install, and maintain the trail information sign/kiosk program at Park District expense. Signage will indicate that the Regional Trail is owned/operated by the Park District. City may provide additional signage within the Regional Trail corridor, provided however, that Park District shall approve additional signage, and that City shall be responsible for providing and maintaining respective signage. The Park District shall not unreasonably withhold approval of City signage. The party responsible for trail design, construction and/or reconstruction shall provide all trail regulatory signs as prescribed by the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Mn MUTCD), as a part of the design and construction of May 25, 2022 - SS 7 the Trail. Park District shall be responsible for the maintenance of regulatory signs post-construction at Park District expense. City shall be responsible for providing and maintaining roadway crossing treatments such as pedestrian striping, road signs and/or other treatments as prescribed by Mn MUTCD, or as appropriate when the Regional Trail crosses a City, County or State roadway anda City obligation to install such treatments exists. L. Utilities. City shall enforce its franchise agreements with utility companies and, where such authority exists, require utility companies to relocate utilities at their own expense. City shall at all times retain the right to maintain, repair or replace any existing utilities and related facilities in, on, or under said Regional Trail provided that if any such activities by the City shall or are reasonably likely to damage or limit the use of the Regional Trail, the City will give the Park District ninety (90) days prior written notice of the same (except in cases of emergency, where no advance notice shall be required). The City will upon completion of such activities so affecting the Regional Trail or any portion thereof, restore the Regional Trail to its preexisting condition or better. For clarity, this restoration obligation shall require reasonable patching of disturbed pavement, but not reconstruction to restore a seamless product, as agreed upon by both parties prior to completion of the repairs. City and Park District recognize that prior notice is needed to develop temporary trail detour routes and temporary signage. City and Park District will cooperatively determine and implement a temporary detour route when feasible. M. Law Enforcement. The City will patrol and police the Regional Trail in such manner and by such persons as the City shall deem necessary, and may enforce all rules and ordinances of the City except as provided herein. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Park District shall have the right to enforce its rules, regulations and ordinances with respect to the Regional Trail, to the extent the same does not directly conflict with the City’s enforcement of the City’s rules and ordinances. Neither party shall promulgate any ordinance, rule or regulation which contravenes this Agreement with respect to the Regional Trail. N. Indemnification. Each party is responsible for its own acts and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other applicable law govern the parties’ liability. To the full extent permitted by law, this Agreement is intended to be and shall be construed as a “cooperative activity” and it is the intent of the parties that they shall be deemed a “single governmental unit” for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subd. 1a (a); provided further that for purposes of that statute, each party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for the acts or omissions of the other party. In addition to the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to waive or limit any immunity from, or limitation on, liability available to either party, whether set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or otherwise. O. Successor and Assigns. The Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, provided, however, that neither City May 25, 2022 - SS 8 nor Park District shall have the right to assign its rights, obligations and interests in or under this Agreement to any other party without the prior written consent of the other party. P. Amendment, Modification or Waiver. No amendment, modification or waiver of any condition, provision or term of this Agreement shall be valid or of any effect unless made in writing and signed by the party or parties to be bound, or its duly authorized representative. Any waiver by either party shall be effective only with respect to the subject matter thereof and the particular occurrence described therein, and shall not affect the rights of either party with respect to any similar or dissimilar occurrences in the future. Q. Rights and Remedies Cumulative. The rights and remedies provided by this Agreement are cumulative and no right or remedy at law or in equity which either party hereto might otherwise have by virtue of a default under this Agreement nor the exercise of any such right or remedy by either party will impair such party’s standing to exercise any other right or remedy. R. No Agency. Nothing contained herein and no action by either party hereto will be deemed or construed by such parties or by any third person to create the relationship of principal and agent or a partnership or a joint venture or any other association between or among the parties hereto. S. Saving Provision. If any provision of the Agreement shall be found invalid or unenforceable with respect to any entity or in any jurisdiction, remaining provisions of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and such provisions found to be unlawful or unenforceable shall not be affected as to their enforcement or lawfulness as to any other entity or in any other jurisdiction, and to such extent the terms and provisions of this Agreement are intended to be severable. T. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by Park District or City by mutual agreement or as otherwise provided in this Agreement. This Agreement shall be terminable by either party upon a material breach by the other party. The provisions of Section N survive termination with respect to claims that arise from actions or occurrences that occurred prior to termination. U. Governing Laws. This Agreement will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. V. Title and Signing Authority. City warrants that it will own good and marketable title to all property in which City provides public trailway easement or real property rights to Park District and that the undersigned is authorized to execute this Agreement. W. Enforcement. In the event either party should bring an action to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other all of the legal or other expenses of the prevailing party, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, and to have the same awarded as part of the judgment in the proceeding in which legal expenses and attorneys’ fees were awarded. May 25, 2022 - SS 9 X. Notices. Any notice given under this Agreement shall be deemed given on the first business day following the date the same is deposited in the United States Mail (registered or certified) postage prepaid, addressed as follows: If to the Park District: Superintendent Three Rivers Park District c/c Legal Counsel 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 If to City: City Administrator City of Corcoran 8200 County Rd 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 With Copy to: John Thames, City Attorney 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway Suite 305 Minneapolis, MN 55430 May 25, 2022 - SS 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Park District and City have entered into this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. Three Rivers Park District, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota Dated: ___ By: Its Chair – Board of Commissioners Dated: ___ By: Its Superintendent And Secretary to the Board City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation Dated: ___ By: Its Mayor Dated: ___ By: Its City Administrator Exhibits May 25, 2022 - SS 11 Exhibit A Conceptual Regional Trail Route Exhibit B Public Trailway Perpetual Easement and Permanent Irrevocable Permit Agreement Exhibit C Regional Trail Standard Details Exhibit A Conceptual Regional Trail Route May 25, 2022 - SS 12 Exhibit B Public Trailway Perpetual Easement and Permanent Irrevocable Permit Agreement May 25, 2022 - SS 13 PUBLIC TRAILWAY PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND PERMANENT IRREVOCABLE PERMIT AGREEMENT This Public Trailway Easement (“Easement”) and Permanent Irrevocable Permit (“Permit”), made this ______ day of ________, 202_, between the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Grantor”) and Three Rivers Park District, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, Hennepin County, Minnesota (“Grantee”). RECITALS WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee entered into a Trailway Cooperative Agreement (“Agreement”) for ___________ Regional Trail (“Trail”) dated as of _________ __, 202_; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, Grantor agreed to convey to Grantee an Easement and/or Permit as further described herein and Grantee agreed to accept Easement and/or Permit according to the terms and conditions contained herein; and WHEREAS, Grantor is the fee owner of certain real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on the attached Exhibit A (“Easement Area”); and WHEREAS, Grantor is not the fee owner, but has legal authority to construct, maintain and operate sidewalks, trails, and other such publicways and Permit within the area legally described on the attached Exhibit B (“Permit Area”); and WHEREAS, said Easement provided by the Grantor does not convey ownership of lands within the Easement and Permit Areas to the Grantee. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants contained within the Agreement referenced above, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor agrees as follows: TERMS OF PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND PERMANENT AND IRREVOCABLE PERMIT 1.) Grant of Easement. Grantor grants and conveys to the Grantee the Easement legally described and depicted on the attached Exhibit A. The easement shall be perpetual, shall run with the land, shall be binding upon Grantor and its successors and assigns and shall be for the benefit of Grantee and its successors and assigns. The easement shall be non-exclusive; provided, however, this easement shall be prior to and superior to any other easement hereinafter granted. Any future easement shall be subject to and subordinate to, and shall not interfere with, the easement without the consent, in writing, of Grantee. 2.) Grant of Permit. Grantor grants and conveys to the Grantee the permanent, irrevocable Permit legally described and depicted on the attached Exhibit B. In accordance with the Agreement, the Grantor may substitute a Permit for an Easement only where the Grantor currently does not own property rights sufficient to convey an Easement. The permit shall be permanent, shall be binding upon Exhibit B Public Trailway Perpetual Easement and Permanent Irrevocable Permit Agreement May 25, 2022 - SS 14 Grantor and its successors and assigns and shall be for the benefit of Grantee and its successors and assigns. The permit shall be non-exclusive; provided, however, this permit shall be prior to and superior to any other permitted use of the permitted area, hereinafter granted. Any future permit shall be subject to and subordinate to, and shall not interfere with, the permit without the consent, in writing, of Grantee. 3.) Scope of Easement and Permit. The perpetual non-exclusive Easement and Permit granted herein includes the right of the Grantee, its contractor, agents, and employees to locate, install, construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, inspect, alter and repair within the described Easement and Permits Areas any of the following facilities and amenities: public sidewalk or trail, trail signage, informational kiosks, benches, bike racks, fences, trail bridges/tunnels, and any other trail related structure. 4.) Trail Use and Purposes. This Easement and Permit is for public trailway purposes only. The Trail shall be open to the general public, and be used exclusively for outdoor recreation and commuting including but not limited to walking, jogging, skating, biking, and uses allowed under State and Federal law including, but not limited to, other personal driven mobility devices (OPDMD’s) and electric personal assistive devices. In addition, motor vehicles used for maintenance, law enforcement or other public uses will be permitted within the Easement and Permit Areas. 5.) Property Rights and Execution Authority. The Grantor warrants that it 1) owns good and marketable title to the Easement Area, 2) has legal rights to construct, maintain and operate sidewalks, trails and other such publicways within the Permit Area, 3) has the right, title and capacity to convey the Easement and Permit to Grantee, and 4) that the undersigned is authorized to execute this Easement and Permit. 6.) Environmental Matters. Grantor shall provide Grantee written documentation of any and all previously and/or currently present hazardous materials, pollutants, or other contaminants within the Easement and Permit Areas (collectively the “Easement Areas”) known to the Grantor. Beyond any information contained within the same, Grantor has no additional actual knowledge of adverse environmental conditions within the Easement Areas. Grantor shall indemnify and hold harmless Grantee for any costs, expenses, damages, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorney’s fees, or losses resulting from any claims, actions, suits or proceedings based upon the release or threat of release of any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants which relate to the Easement Areas and which release or threat of release occurred during Grantor’s ownership of the Easement Areas prior to the effective date of this Easement and Permit. 7.) Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this instrument shall run with the land and be binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns. [Signature pages to follow] Exhibit B Public Trailway Perpetual Easement and Permanent Irrevocable Permit Agreement May 25, 2022 - SS 15 Exhibit B Public Trailway Perpetual Easement and Permanent Irrevocable Permit Agreement May 25, 2022 - SS 16 In witness whereof, the said parties have caused this instrument to be executed on the date and year first written above. CITY ____________________ __________________________ Its Mayor __________________________ Its City Administrator State of Minnesota ) ) S.S. County of Hennepin ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this _____ day of _____________, 20__, by _______________________ and __________________________, the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively of the City of ________________, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Grantor, on behalf of the same. ____________________________ Notary Public Notary Stamp or Seal Exhibit B Public Trailway Perpetual Easement and Permanent Irrevocable Permit Agreement May 25, 2022 - SS 17 This instrument drafted by: Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 Exhibit B Public Trailway Perpetual Easement and Permanent Irrevocable Permit Agreement May 25, 2022 - SS 18 EXHIBIT A PUBLIC TRAILWAY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION Hold for Legal Description Exhibit B Public Trailway Perpetual Easement and Permanent Irrevocable Permit Agreement May 25, 2022 - SS 19 EXHIBIT B PUBLIC TRAILWAY PERMIT LEGAL DESCRIPTION Hold for Legal Description EXHIBIT B Easement and Limited Use Permit May 25, 2022 - SS 20 EXHIBIT C Regional Trail Standard Details May 25, 2022 - SS 21 EXHIBIT C Regional Trail Standard Details May 25, 2022 - SS 22 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 9b. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Michelle Friedrich Topic: Granicus Project Action Required: Approval Summary Granicus Agenda Building Software Granicus is an agenda building software that offers integration with streaming Council meetings, storing videos, and website hosting and maintenance. At the May 25 meeting, Council reviewed implementation costs for the software solution, an annual year-to-year maintenance estimate, and a 3-year paid in full estimate. Council requested staff obtain a 10-year estimate and review ARPA funding options, which was presented to Council on June 8. Staff was able to determine ARPA funding would cover the cost of implementation this year, with the subscription agreement costs allocated to future General Fund budget years. Council was presented with a 3-year agreement option and a 10-year agreement option. Financial/Budget for Granicus Agenda Building Software 3-Year Agreement Option: Implementation 3-Year (Annually) 3-Year (Paid in Full) (Paid through ARPA) (Paid through General Fund/Budget Annually) $5,500 Year 1: $6,714 $20,143 Year 2: $7,050 Year 3: $7,400 10-Year Agreement Option: Implementation 10-Year Agreement (Paid through ARPA) (Paid through General Fund/Budget Annually) $5,500 Year 1-Year 10: $6,714.60 Agreement Total: $67,146 The 3-year paid in full pricing offers the benefit of a 5 percent discount after the post 3- year per paid-in-full term, versus a 7 percent annual increase for the 3-year annual pricing thereafter, incorporating a savings of $12,142 over a 10-year period. Please note implementation pricing remains the same with each pricing option. The 10-year paid in full pricing offers the benefit of additional savings of $10,399 when when compared with the 3-year paid in full option. To continue workflow and respond as necessary should the pandemic re-emerge, or a new emergency arise, a portion of this project is consistent with the eligibility requirements to access funding of the America Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). Eligible funds could be accessed for the implementation and setup costs of Granicus solutions. The annual subscription portion would be funded through the General Fund and included in future year budgets beginning in 2024. Recommendations Staff recommends moving forward with the Granicus Agenda Building Solutions with either a 3-Year or 10-Year Agreement and include in the General Fund for future budget years, and implementing in 2023 with ARPA funds. Council Action 1. Authorize staff to proceed with the Granicus Agenda Building Solutions implementation and approve either the 3-year maintenance option, or 10-year maintenance option. 2. Decline implementation of Granicus Agenda Building Solutions software. Attachments 1. Granicus Agenda Building 3- and 10-Year Agreement Proposal 408 St. Peter St, Suite 600 THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE Order Form St. Paul, MN 55102 Prepared for Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-271514 Prepared: 02 May 2023 Page 1 of 9 Granicus Proposal for Corcoran, MN ORDER DETAILS Prepared By:Ruth Gonzalez Phone:847-809-5692 Email:ruth.gonzalez@granicus.com Order #:Q-271514 Prepared On:02 May 2023 Expires On:23 Jun 2023 Currency:USD Payment Terms:Net 30 (Payments for subscriptions are due at the beginning of the period of performance.) Period of Performance: The term of the Agreement will commence on the date this document is signed and will continue for 36 months. ORDER TERMS Attachment: 9a1. Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-271514 Prepared: 02 May 2023 Page 2 of 9 PRICING SUMMARY The pricing and terms within this Proposal are specific to the products and volumes contained within this Proposal. One-Time Fees Solution Billing Frequency Quantity/Unit One-Time Fee Peak - Setup & Configuration Up Front 1 Each $0.00 Peak Online Group Training Upon Delivery 6 Hours $0.00 Government Transparency - Setup & Configuration Up Front 1 Each $0.00 Granicus Encoding Appliance Hardware - SDI (AMAX) (GT)Upon Delivery 1 Each $4,500.00 Granicus Video - Online Training Upon Delivery 6 Hours $0.00 Open Platform - Setup and Configuration Up Front 1 Hours $0.00 Send Agenda (Peak) Set up and Config Up Front 1 Each $0.00 Open Platform - Setup and Configuration Up Front 1 Hours $0.00 Granicus Encoding Appliance Hardware - Setup & Config Upon Delivery 1 Each $875.00 US Shipping Charge C - Large Item Upon Delivery 1 Each $125.00 govDelivery for Integrations Set Up and Config Up Front 1 Each $0.00 SUBTOTAL:$5,500.00 Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-271514 Prepared: 02 May 2023 Page 3 of 9 New Subscription Fees Solution Period of Performance Billing Frequency Quantity/ Unit Annual Fee Prorated Fee Peak Agenda Management 01 Jun 2023 - 31 May 2026 Annual 1 Each $3,135.00 $9,405.00 Government Transparency Suite 01 Jun 2023 - 31 May 2026 Annual 1 Each $2,439.60 $7,318.80 Open Platform Suite 01 Jun 2023 - 31 May 2026 Annual 1 Each $0.00 $0.00 Send Agenda (Peak)01 Jun 2023 - 31 May 2026 Annual 1 Each $0.00 $0.00 Open Platform Suite 01 Jun 2023 - 31 May 2026 Annual 1 Each $0.00 $0.00 govDelivery for Integrations 01 Jun 2023 - 31 May 2026 Annual 1 Each $0.00 $0.00 Granicus Encoding Appliance Software (GT)01 Jun 2023 - 31 May 2026 Annual 1 Each $1,140.00 $3,420.00 SUBTOTAL:$6,714.60 $20,143.80 Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-271514 Prepared: 02 May 2023 Page 4 of 9 FUTURE YEAR PRICING Period of PerformanceSolution(s)Year 2 Year 3 Peak Agenda Management $3,291.75 $3,456.34 Government Transparency Suite $2,561.58 $2,689.66 Open Platform Suite $0.00 $0.00 Send Agenda (Peak)$0.00 $0.00 Open Platform Suite $0.00 $0.00 govDelivery for Integrations $0.00 $0.00 Granicus Encoding Appliance Software (GT)$1,197.00 $1,256.85 SUBTOTAL:$7,050.33 $7,402.85 Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-271514 Prepared: 02 May 2023 Page 5 of 9 PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS Solution Description Peak Agenda Management Peak Agenda Management is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) solution that enables government organizations to simplify the agenda management and minutes recording process of the clerk’s office. Peak Agenda Management allows clerks to streamline the way they compile and produce agendas and record minutes for public meetings and includes: ·Unlimited user accounts ·Unlimited meeting bodies and meeting types ·Access to up to one (1) Peak Agenda Management site Government Transparency Suite Government Transparency are the live in-meeting functions. Streaming of an event, pushing of documents, and indexing of events. Open Platform Suite Open Platform is access to MediaManager, upload of archives, ability to post agendas/documents, and index of archives. These are able to be published and accessible through a searchable viewpage. Send Agenda (Peak)Send Agenda is dependent on an active subscription to the relevant govMeetings agenda. Peak - Setup & Configuration Setup and Configuration for Peak Agenda Management includes implementation of: ·Up to one (1) meeting body’s Standard Agenda, Cover Page and Minutes report template ·Up to one (1) public view page portal Peak Online Group Training Online Group Training for Peak Agenda Management allows clients to have up to six (6) users participate in online group sessions with a Granicus trainer and other client users to learn how to use the system. Open Platform Suite Open Platform is access to MediaManager, upload of archives, ability to post agendas/documents, and index of archives. These are able to be published and accessible through a searchable viewpage. Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-271514 Prepared: 02 May 2023 Page 6 of 9 Solution Description Government Transparency - Setup & Configuration Setup and Configuration for Government Transparency Suite includes implementation of: ·Up to one (1) View Page and Player template ·Up to one (1) Live Manager configuration Granicus Encoding Appliance Hardware - SDI (AMAX) (GT) AMAX Encoder with Osprey SDI Card. Used to pass commands and data from LiveManager that include Start/Stop of webcast, indexing, and document display. Also serves to distribute video and captions to be distributed to the CDN or Performance Accelerator. Granicus Video - Online Training Granicus Video - Online Training Open Platform - Setup and Configuration Setup and configuration for Open Platform govDelivery for Integrations Send notification bulletins directly to constituents who subscribe to receive updates directly through Granicus (powered by govDelivery). Receive a monthly metrics report delivered via email to show subscriber growth and engagement activity for the past month of bulletin sends, and grow subscribers through access to the Granicus Advanced Network. Note: govDelivery integrations is dependent on an active subscription to the relevant govMeetings agenda or govAccess CMS solutions. Open Platform - Setup and Configuration Setup and configuration for Open Platform Granicus Encoding Appliance Software (GT) Granicus Encoding Appliance Software (GT) This includes the LiveManager Software solution where webcasts are started/stopped, agendas amended and indexed, votes and attendance recorded, and minutes created. Granicus Encoding Appliance Hardware - Setup & Config Remote configuration and deployment of an encoding appliance. US Shipping Charge C - Large Item US shipping of a large item Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-271514 Prepared: 02 May 2023 Page 7 of 9 GRANICUS ADVANCED NETWORK AND SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION ·Granicus Communications Suite Subscriber Information. o Data provided by the Client and contact information gathered through the Client's own web properties or activities will remain the property of the Client ('Direct Subscriber'), including any and all personally identifiable information (PII). Granicus will not release the data without the express written permission of the Client, unless required by law. o Granicus shall: (i) not disclose the Client's data except to any third parties as necessary to operate the Granicus Products and Services (provided that the Client hereby grants to Granicus a perpetual, non-cancelable, worldwide, non-exclusive license to utilize any data, on an anonymous or aggregate basis only, that arises from the use of the Granicus Products by the Client, whether disclosed on, subsequent to, or prior to the Effective Date, to improve the functionality of the Granicus Products and any other legitimate business purpose, including the right to sublicense such data to third parties, subject to all legal restrictions regarding the use and disclosure of such information). ·Data obtained through the Granicus Advanced Network. o Granicus offers a SaaS product, known as the Communications Cloud, that offers Direct Subscribers recommendations to subscribe to other Granicus Client's digital communication (the 'Advanced Network'). When a Direct Subscriber signs up through one of the recommendations of the Advanced Network, that subscriber is a 'Network Subscriber' to the agency it subscribed to through the Advanced Network. o Network Subscribers are available for use while the Client is under an active subscription with Granicus. Network Subscribers will not transfer to the Client upon termination of any Granicus Order, SOW, or Exhibit. The Client shall not use or transfer any of the Network Subscribers after termination of its Order, SOW, or Exhibit placed under this agreement. All information related to Network Subscribers must be destroyed by the Client within 15 calendar days of the Order, SOW, or Exhibit placed under this agreement terminating. o Opt-In. During the last 10 calendar days of the Client's subscription, the Client may send an opt- in email to Network Subscribers that shall include an explanation of the Client's relationship with Granicus terminating and that the Network Subscribers may visit the Client's website to subscribe to further updates from the Client in the future. Any Network Subscriber that does not opt-in will not be transferred with the subscriber list provided to the Client upon termination. UPDATES TO SHARED SHORT CODES FOR SMS/TEXT MESSAGING (US CLIENTS ONLY): ·Granicus will be migrating all clients with SMS/Text Messaging Solutions using a shared short code option to a unique standard toll-free number within the United States (International numbers not supported). Short Codes are recommended for Text-to-Subscribe functionalities, if enabled where available, for an additional fee. ·Client must have explicit opt-in for all destinations sent to and adhere to all CTIA guidelines for the duration of its use. Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-271514 Prepared: 02 May 2023 Page 8 of 9 TERMS & CONDITIONS ·This quote, and all products and services delivered hereunder are governed by the terms located at https://granicus.com/legal/licensing, including any product-specific terms included therein (the “License Agreement”). If your organization and Granicus has entered into a separate agreement or is utilizing a contract vehicle for this transaction, the terms of the License Agreement are incorporated into such separate agreement or contract vehicle by reference, with any directly conflicting terms and conditions being resolved in favor of the separate agreement or contract vehicle to the extent applicable. ·If submitting a Purchase Order, please include the following language: The pricing, terms and conditions of quote Q-271514 dated 02 May 2023 are incorporated into this Purchase Order by reference and shall take precedence over any terms and conditions included in this Purchase Order. ·This quote is exclusive of applicable state, local, and federal taxes, which, if any, will be included in the invoice. It is the responsibility of Corcoran, MN to provide applicable exemption certificate(s). ·Any lapse in payment may result in suspension of service and will require the payment of a setup fee to reinstate the subscription. ·Granicus will provide a three (3) year warranty with respect to required hardware. Within the three (3) year warranty period, Granicus shall repair or replace any required hardware provided directly from Granicus that fails to function properly due to normal wear and tear, defective workmanship, or defective materials. Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-271514 Prepared: 02 May 2023 Page 9 of 9 BILLING INFORMATION Billing Contact:Purchase Order Required? [ ] - No [ ] - Yes Billing Address:PO Number: If PO required Billing Email:Billing Phone: If submitting a Purchase Order, please include the following language: The pricing, terms, and conditions of quote Q-271514 dated 02 May 2023 are incorporated into this Purchase Order by reference and shall take precedence over any terms and conditions included in this Purchase Order. AGREEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE By signing this document, the undersigned certifies they have authority to enter the agreement. The undersigned also understands the services and terms. Corcoran, MN Signature: \s1\ Name: \n1\ Title: \t1\ Date: \d1\ Order #: Q-284018 Prepared: 30 May 2023 Page 1 of 7 408 St. Peter St, Suite 600 St. Paul, MN 55102 THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE Order Form Prepared for Corcoran, MN Granicus Proposal for Corcoran, MN ORDER DETAILS Prepared By: Stephanie Serbedzija Phone: Email: Order #: Prepared On: Expires On: (224) 284-1107 stephanie.serbedzija@granicus.com Q-284018 30 May 2023 21 Jul 2023 ORDER TERMS Currency: USD Payment Terms: Net 30 (Payments for subscriptions are due at the beginning of the period of performance.) Period of Performance: The term of the Agreement will commence on the date this document is signed and will continue for 120 months. The subscription includes the following domain(s) and subdomain(s): https://www.corcoranmn.gov/ Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-284018 Prepared: 30 May 2023 Page 2 of 7 for up to 4000 subscribers Communications Cloud Tier: PRICING SUMMARY The pricing and terms within this Proposal are specific to the products and volumes contained within this Proposal. One-Time Fees Solution Billing Frequency Quantity/Unit One-Time Fee Granicus Web - Essentials Package Milestones - 40/30/30 1 Each $7,110.00 SUBTOTAL: $7,110.00 New Subscription Fees Solution Billing Frequency Quantity/Unit Annual Fee OpenCities SaaS License Annual 1 Each $5,400.00 SUBTOTAL: $5,400.00 Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-284018 Prepared: 30 May 2023 Page 3 of 7 FUTURE YEAR PRICING Period of Performance Solution(s) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 OpenCities Saas License $5,670.00 $5,953.50 $6,251.18 $6,563.73 $6,563.73 $6,563.73 $6,563.73 $6,563.73 $6,563.73 SUBTOTAL: $5,670.00 $5,953.50 $6,251.18 $6,563.73 $6,563.73 $6,563.73 $6,563.73 $6,563.73 $6,563.73 Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-284018 Prepared: 30 May 2023 Page 4 of 7 PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS Solution Description Granicus Web - Essentials Package The Essentials package provides a citizen-focused website based on best practices & patterns out-of-the-box using proven pre-configured layouts. This implementation level is recommended for organizations that need a rapid implementation timeline or those with a small implementation team that does not have the capacity to engage in a traditional UX Design process. This package includes: • Professional Project o Management - Weekly / bi-weekly communication • One (1) homepage layout from Granicus responsive design library • One (1) Information Architecture (IA) Package (basic) o Best practices review • One (1) Content Rationalization Package (basic) o Best practices review, one (1) hour session o Site scrape loaded into AIM framework document • One (1) Visual Design Package o One (1) homepage design mockup – based on logo + 3 colors o Interior page sample o Mobile version sample o One (1) round of design revisions • Development/CMS Implementation • Content Migration - up to fifty (50) pages • QA & Accessibility Report • Remote Training - Delivered in three (3) non-consecutive sessions o eight (8) hours total - Up to ten (10) people Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-284018 Prepared: 30 May 2023 Page 5 of 7 Solution Description OpenCities SaaS License The OpenCities platform allows you to launch modern, easy to use websites that evolve to put the needs of your community at the center. The SaaS License includes: • All OpenCities out of the box functionality (excluding optional/premium modules priced separately) • Platform setup and full project management • Managed cloud hosting via Microsoft AzureGov • Ongoing security updates • Ongoing product updates and enhancements • WCAG AA Accessibility maintained perpetually • 99.9% up-time guarantee and 24/7 support for Priority 1 issues (per SLA) • Comprehensive SLA and Support Ticketing system See subscription agreement for details. Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-284018 Prepared: 30 May 2023 Page 6 of 7 TERMS & CONDITIONS • This quote, and all products and services delivered hereunder are governed by the terms located at https://granicus.com/legal/licensing, including any product-specific terms included therein (the “License Agreement”). If your organization and Granicus has entered into a separate agreement or is utilizing a contract vehicle for this transaction, the terms of the License Agreement are incorporated into such separate agreement or contract vehicle by reference, with any directly conflicting terms and conditions being resolved in favor of the separate agreement or contract vehicle to the extent applicable. • If submitting a Purchase Order, please include the following language: The pricing, terms and conditions of quote Q-284018 dated 30 May 2023 are incorporated into this Purchase Order by reference and shall take precedence over any terms and conditions included in this Purchase Order. • This quote is exclusive of applicable state, local, and federal taxes, which, if any, will be included in the invoice. It is the responsibility of Corcoran, MN to provide applicable exemption certificate(s). • Any lapse in payment may result in suspension of service and will require the payment of a setup fee to reinstate the subscription. Order Form Corcoran, MN Order #: Q-284018 Prepared: 30 May 2023 Page 7 of 7 BILLING INFORMATION Billing Contact: Purchase Order Required? [ ] - No [ ] - Yes Billing Address: PO Number: If PO required Billing Email: Billing Phone: If submitting a Purchase Order, please include the following language: The pricing, terms, and conditions of quote Q-284018 dated 30 May 2023 are incorporated into this Purchase Order by reference and shall take precedence over any terms and conditions included in this Purchase Order. AGREEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE By signing this document, the undersigned certifies they have authority to enter the agreement. The undersigned also understands the services and terms. Corcoran, MN Signature: Name: Title: Date: City Products Tenure Minneapolis Communications and SMS module, Short Term Rental - Host Compliance 21 years Brooklyn Park Communications and SMS module, Video streaming services 14 years Maple Grove Video streaming 14 years Eden Prairie Website, Communication, SMS, Video streaming 15 years Bloomington Peak, Civic Engagement HQ, Communications Core 14 years Edina Novus Agenda, Video Streaming, Engagement HQ 16 years Plymouth Purchased Peak in Q1 2023. Website, Communication Core, Video services 14 years Minnetonka Purchased Peak in Q4 2022. Video streaming, FOIA software, Boards & Commission module, GovQA CRM, Website, Communications, SMS, Engagement HQ 15 years Brooklyn Center Website, Communications, Novus Agenda 14 years St. Louis Park Website, Communications, SMS, Video 15 years Richfield,Communications, GovQA, Novus Agenda 7 years Golden Valley Peak, Video streaming, Communications Core 15 years Hopkins Video streaming 11 years New Hope Video streaming 15 years Crystal Video streaming 15 years Rogers Novus Agenda 5 years Robbinsdale Website, and Video streaming 15 years Osseo Video streaming 15 years Orono Video streaming, looking to also purchase Peak Agenda in May 2023 9 years Attachment: 9a2. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 9c. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Michelle Friedrich Topic: Council Sound System Action Required: Approval Summary At the June 22, 2023 Council meeting, staff was directed to obtain quotes for a Council sound system. To continue workflow and respond as necessary should the pandemic re-emerge, or a new emergency arise, this project is consistent with the eligibility requirements to access funding of the America Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). Eligible funds could be accessed for the implementation and setup costs of the Council sound system. Recommendations Staff recommends moving forward a Council sound system and utilizing available ARPA funds. Council Action 1. Authorize staff to proceed with implementing a sound system in Council Chambers utilizing ARPA funds. 2. Decline implementation of a sound system in Council Chambers. Attachments 1. Z-Systems Quote for Council Sound System Z Systems, inc Purchase Agreement 3724 Oregon Ave S Saint Louis Park, MN 55426 Date:07/19/23 Quote #:ZSYQ2168 P.O. #:FOB:Mfr's DockTel. Fax. 952.974.3140 952.974.3141 Terms:1% 10 Net 30www.zsyst.com Project:Audiovisual System Upgrades Q3 '23 Rep:Expiration freddieg8/19/2023 Sold To:Ship To: Michelle Friedrich Attn:Michelle Friedrich Corcoran, City of Corcoran, City of 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Item Qty Description Unit Cost Total $3,798.79Equipment 1 $424.80 $424.80Atlona USB 2.0 Extender Kit over Category Cable, up to 100 metersAT-USB-EX100-KIT 1 $384.00 $384.00Atlona Avance 4K/UHD PoE HDMI Transmitter and Receiver KitAT-AVA-EX70-KIT 4 $108.36 $433.44TANNOY 4" Coaxial In-Ceiling Loudspeaker for Installation ApplicationsTA-CVS4 1 $393.96 $393.96Lab Gruppen 2 x 120W Commercial Amplifier with Energy Star Certification LAB-CA1202 1 $643.08 $643.08SnapOne "Strong™ FS Series Rack System with DC Fans - 24"" Depth 15U"SR-FS-SYSTEM-DC-15 U 1 $289.20 $289.20Atlona 4K HDR Two-Output HDMI Distribution AmplifierAT-RON-442 1 $1,230.31 $1,230.31Misc Installation Materials and Installation Supplies (lot).Materials $7,352.94Labor 1 $7,352.94 $7,352.94Installation Labor (lot). - Per Scope Above.Installation $6,997.14Service Contract Options As mentioned below, Silver level service includes on-site, per-incident support/troubleshooting (but doesn't cover new equipment needed to repair system, or replace non functioning equipment), and the Bronze level includes only remote support. Z Systems will install network-controllable power outlets for some equipment if service contracts are purchased, so that we are able to power cycle equipment remotely, in order to expedite service. Equipment covered in the service contract would be: - All new equipment in council chambers video system sold by Z Systems in 2020 - All new equipment in Police training room/EOC system sold by Z Systems in 2020 - New additions to council chambers video system sold by Z Systems in 2023 - Other minor additions to council chambers video system that occurred between 2020 and 2023 - All equipment listed above. 1 $6,997.14 $6,997.14Z Systems Annual Service and Support Contract - Silver Level - Remote and On-Site Support Includes email, telephone, remote access, and on-site troubleshooting services and installation of software updates. Does not include software, software updates, parts, repair costs, hardware warranties, manufacturer support and/or software assurance Item Qty Description Unit Cost Total contracts. Equipment To Be Covered: See above SC-Silver 0 $2,675.71 $0.00Z Systems Annual Support Contract - Bronze Level - Remote Support Includes email, telephone, and remote access troubleshooting services and installation of software updates when practical. Does not include on-site troubleshooting and diagnosis, software, software updates, parts, repair costs, hardware warranties, manufacturer support and/or software assurance contracts. Equipment To Be Covered: See above SC-Bronze Please contact me if I can be of further assistance. As an authorized representative of the organization listed above, I hereby order and agree to purchase these products and/or services from Z Systems based on the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement and the document 'Z SYSTEMS INC. Terms and Conditions' which can be found at zsyst.com/terms. All pricing quoted is subject to change / management approval at time of order entry/acceptance. Any returns, if accepted by our vendors, will be subject to a 20% restocking fee. Subtotal $18,148.87 Sales Tax $0.00 SIGNATURE:Total $18,148.87 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 9d. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: City Center Drive and 79th Place Improvements Bid Alternate Discussion Action Required: Discussion Summary At the July 13, 2023 meeting staff presented the plans and specifications for the City Center Drive and 79th Place Utility and Street Improvement project. Discussion and feedback was provided to staff and authorization to bid the project was provided. At the July 20th Parks and Trails Commission meeting, there was some discussion of hanging baskets and if a bid alternate could be made to price the hanging baskets on the pole. As there is limited time to make add bid alternates, staff would like to understand if Council would like to pursue a bid alternate for hanging. Financial/Budget The City Center Drive and 79th Place Utility and Street Improvements project is funded through a combination of development funds, bonds, and municipal state aid funds. ARPA funds may be utilized for the utility connections. Options 1. Provide direction on authorizing bid alternates. Recommendation 1. Provide direction on authorizing bid alternates. Council Action Provide direction on authorizing bid alternates. Attachments N/A STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 10a. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: City Administrator Recruitment Process Action Required: Direction Summary I have tendered my resignation effective July 17, 2023. This was a difficult decision as I have enjoyed my time in Corcoran for the last eight years and all the experiences of working in municipal government setting. The exceptional people and team I have been able to work with each and every day truly will be missed. As you are aware, the workload on the team is exceptionally high, and the Council should proceed as soon as possible with replacing the position. The Council should discuss the job search process and direct staff on how to proceed. Council should also discuss appointing an interim administrator. As a comprehensive search has been the preferred process and the current recruitment contract has not yet expired, it is highly recommended to continue working with David Drown and Associates, an executive recruiter, to assist with the recruitment process as staff workload continues to be challenging. The work of an executive recruiter includes meeting with Council and staff to develop the position profile, posting the position and seeking qualified candidates, evaluating candidates, developing an initial recommended list for consideration, assisting in the selection of semi-finalists, assisting in interviewing finalists, and contract assistance with the preferred candidate. Representatives from David Down and Associates have been contacted and are working to prepare a timeline for the City for the recruitment process. Financial/Budget The current contract with David Drown and Associates has not expired, however, some expenses may be required not included as part of the initial contract. It is likely the process may take several months and budget savings from the position not being filled will cover a portion or all of those costs. Options 1. Direct staff to review next steps with David Drown and Associates to resume the executive recruitment process for City Administrator. 2. Direct staff to proceed in a different manner. Recommendation Proceed with existing contract with David Drown and Associates to resume the executive recruitment process for City Administrator. Page 2 Council Action Direct staff on action related to a recruitment process for the position of City Administrator. Attachments None City of Corcoran Administrator Search Draft Timeline July 27, 2023 ITEM TASK COMPLETION DATE Professional position profile Use position profile from previous search Approve position profile City Council approves profile, salary range, and hiring process August 10, 2023 Candidate recruitment ▪Post position immediately upon approval of profile ▪Comprehensively advertise ▪Email and phone calls to prospective candidates August 14, 2023- September 11, 2023 Screening of applicants DDA will review and rank applicants based on job related criteria and select semifinalists September 12, 2023 Personality Index DDA will administer a work-related personality index to all semifinalists September 20, 2023 Video interview Each semifinalist will complete a video interview September 20, 2023 Selection of finalists ▪Finalists selected for interviews ▪DDA will notify candidates not selected as finalists September 28, 2023 Background check of all finalists Includes: ▪Criminal background: county, state, national ▪Sex offender registry ▪Social Security number verification ▪Employment and education verification ▪Credit check October 12, 2023 Reference check on all finalists DDA will conduct reference checks with current and former employers on all finalists October 12, 2023 Intellect profile DDA will administer an intellect profile measuring verbal reasoning, mathematical and logical reasoning, and overall mental aptitude. October 12, 2023 Finalist packet DDA will provide the Council information including: ▪Summary of references ▪Results of background checks ▪Personality index reports ▪Video interview ▪Resumes, etc. October 13, 2023 Interviews DDA will prepare all interview materials and be present at all interviews and other functions. It is recommended that Council interviews be at a special meeting October 17, 2023 Special Meeting Decision City Council may select candidate for offer October 17, 2023 Offer and agreement DDA will negotiate agreement with selected candidate October 18, 2023 Projected start date New Administrator begins November 13, 2023 Follow up DDA will follow up periodically with the new Administrator October 2024 Added Agenda Item: 10a1. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 10b. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Administration Department Reorganization – Job Descriptions Administrative Services Director, Planner, Recreation Supervisor, Program Coordinator Action Required: Approval Summary On July 14, 2022, Council approved a reorganization of the Administration Department. Staff have been working to refine our staffing plan and have recognized the need to create a more efficient reporting structure. Currently, the Administrative Services Director, Director of Public Safety, Director of Public Works, the Planner, Planning Technician, Recreation Supervisor, Program Coordinator, Contract Planner, and Contract Code Enforcement staff report directly to the City Administrator. Staff is recommending the Planner, Planning Technician, Recreation Supervisor, Program Coordinator, Contract Planner, and Contract Code Enforcement positions report to the Administrative Services Director. With this reorganization the Administrative Services Director job description has been updated to include the additional responsibilities and a regrade from a Grade 16 to Grade 18. This city’s other director level positions pay are at a Grade 19. During staff’s reorganization review it was discovered the following job positions were approved by Council on November 22, 2021, but the following job descriptions were omitted: •Planner •Recreation Supervisor •Program Coordinator Financial/Budget A wage increase for the Administrative Services Director to recognize the additional responsibilities and grade change. This will be absorbed in the 2023 budget. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2023-65 Amending the Organizational Structure of the Administration Department and Approving Job Descriptions. Council Action (Hard copy to be emailed on Tuesday, July 25.) 1. Approve Resolution 2023-65 Amending the Organizational Structure of the Administration Department and Approving Job Descriptions 2.Decline Resolution 2023-65 Amending the Organizational Structure of the Administration Department and Approving Job Descriptions Attachments 1.Administration Department current and proposed organizational chart 2.Administrative Services Director job description – clean and red-lined 3.Planner job description – clean and red-lined 4.Recreation Supervisor job description – clean and red-lined 5.Program Coordinator job description – clean and red-lined 6.Resolution 2023-65 Amending the Organizational Structure of the Administration Department and Approving Job Descriptions (Hard copy to be emailed on Tuesday, July 25.) Attachment: 10b1. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 1 Department Administration Reports To City Administrator Points 525 Grade 18 FLSA Exempt Bargaining Unit Confidential Employee Revision Date July 2023 Description The Administrative Services Director is the department head for the Administration Department and is responsible to coordinate and execute administrative duties of the city. The Administrative Services Director performs complex professional work planning, organizing, and directing activities of finance, payroll, accounting, information technology, human resources, City Council operations, elections, data practices, communications, city administration, and related work as apparent or assigned. Supervision of the Finance Manager, City Clerk, Planner, contract planner, Recreation Supervisor, contract information technology staff, and departmental supervision exercised over all personnel within the department. The Administrative Services Director works in partnership with the City Administrator to develop organizational policies, processes, and systems and to assist in carrying out city objectives. Essential Duties and Responsibilities •Serve on the leadership team for the City of Corcoran. o Demonstrate by example the service excellence and integrity expected from all city staff. o Develop respectful and cooperative work relationships with co-workers, the public and outside contacts /constituencies in a manner that helps establish, maintain, and enhance Corcoran’s reputation as a well-managed city. •Serve as Acting City Administrator in the absence of the City Administrator. •Supervise Finance Manager, City Clerk, Planner, Recreation Supervisor, and collateral staff. o Coordinate and supervise the Finance Manager City Clerk, Planner, Recreation Supervisor, and their activities. o Perform a variety of supervisory tasks including interviewing candidates, recommending person(s) to be hired, determines work assignments, scheduling, conducts performance appraisals and disciplinary matters. o Establish a team environment that encourages open communication and empowers staff to take ownership in position and organization in a manner that supports the vision and direction of the City and enhances employee satisfaction. o Oversee contract information technology services. Prepare and manage the Administration Department budget. •Serve as the Human Resource Director o Oversee all aspects of human resource management including job postings, establish hiring criteria, interviewing, administer scoring exams, prepare eligibility lists, personnel related compliance programs (EEO/AA, FLSA, ADA, Veteran’s Preference, FMLA etc.) employee benefits program coordination, drug and alcohol testing, and other human resource programs. City of Corcoran Attachment: 10b2. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 2 o Oversee risk management functions, including safety and Workers’ Compensation, ensure appropriate processing of claims, correcting of violations, and return to work process. o Coordinate with departments to administer the City’s performance evaluation programs and human resource records retention program. o Assist the City Administrator in the administration and development of city policies, recruitment, and selection of employees. o Ensures compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws affecting human resources. o Advise supervisors on disciplinary matters and counseling employees; advise on policies and procedures; answer questions, mediate disputes, investigate complaints. o Participates in labor negotiations by preparing impact analysis and recommends the City position on contract matters. o Oversee the employee recognition program. o Coordinate employee training opportunities. o Coordinates the City’s Safety Committee. o Work with the Leadership Team to implement organization wide culture initiatives. •Coordinate key City contracts including information technology and recycling. •Serve as the liaison for the Charter Commission. Coordinate meetings, prepare correspondence and staff the Charter Commission meetings. •Implement the City’s Communication strategies. Work with the City Administrator and City Clerk to compose and execute a communication strategy and guides the creation of City’s digital and non- digital communication. •Perform other duties and activities as assigned. Minimum Qualifications Bachelor’s degree in business, accounting, public administration, or closely related field; five or more progressively responsible years of related experience, or equivalent. Valid driver’s license. Desired Qualifications Two years of experience as a City Clerk or Finance Manager; two years of experience working for a municipal government, a master’s degree in business, accounting, public administration or closely related field, certification by the Minnesota Clerks and Finance Officers Association as a Minnesota Certified Municipal Clerk, experience managing or assisting with the management of federal, state, and local elections, experience supervising full-time employees. Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance •Customer service skills including demonstrated ability to build positive relationships with employees and managers. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 3 •Knowledge of the functions and responsibilities of city departments, staff, and key community members. •Knowledge of public information laws, rules, and regulations applicable to city government. •Knowledge of and ability to operate accounting software and standard office software, including strong Excel skills sufficient to manipulate data, draft reports and maintain records. •Ability to analyze and resolve problems. •Ability to perform research, assemble information, and prepare reports and studies. •Ability to exercise initiative, discretion, and independence of judgment. •Ability to work effectively under pressure and to competently handle numerous diverse tasks in a single time-period. •Ability to plan and perform duties with minimal supervision. •The ability to work independently and to prioritize work requests; ability to plan coordinate and prioritize workload to meet project deadlines. •Verbal and high-level written communication skills sufficient to effectively present information and respond to questions from a wide variety of audiences, and reading comprehension skills sufficient to read, understand and interpret complex and varied work-related materials. •Knowledge of data privacy laws and ability to maintain highest confidentiality when dealing with sensitive or private information. •Promote and adhere to the City of Corcoran workplace values of accountability, teamwork, and commitment to the city’s goals and measures. Physical and Mental Requirements Physical effort is light, with lifting or carrying up to 25 pounds intermittently. Report preparation and word processing will at times require extended use of a keyboard. Work interruptions are frequent. The Administrative Services Director must be able to use judgment to respond to situations occurring during the absence of the Administrator. Travel within the City or region to attend meetings is likely. There is occasional exposure to field or construction site conditions when visiting or meeting at properties within the City. Working Conditions Work is performed in a normal office environment. Attendance at evening meetings is required. The Administrative Services Director may be the person to whom a complaint is delivered by a citizen or referred by an employee and work may involve dealing with and calming individuals who are emotionally charged over an issue. Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator retains the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 1 Department Administration Reports To City Administrator Points 525 Grade 18 FLSA Exempt Bargaining Unit Confidential Employee Revision Date July 2023 Description The Administrative Services Director is the department head for the Administration Department and is responsible to coordinate and execute administrative duties of the city. The Administrative Services Director is also performs complex professional work planning, organizing, and directiveing activities of responsible for the areas of finance, payroll, accounting, information technology, human resources, City Council operations, elections, data practices, communications, city administration, and other functions as assigned related work as apparent or assigned. Supervision of the Finance Manager, City Clerk, Planner, contract planner, Recreation Supervisor, and contract information technology staff, and departmental supervision exercised over all personnel within the department. The Administrative Services Director works in partnership with the City Administrator to develop organizational policies, processes, and systems and to assist in carrying out city objectives. Scope of Impact: The Administrative Services Director is responsible for the operations of the administration department which includes supervision of the Finance Manager and City Clerk and contract information technology services. The position oversees the functions of human resource management. including recruitment and file management. Essential Duties and Responsibilities •Serve on the leadership team for the City of Corcoran. o Demonstrate by example the service excellence and integrity expected from all city staff; o Develop respectful and cooperative work relationships with co-workers, the public and outside contacts /constituencies in a manner that helps establish, maintain, and enhance Corcoran’s reputation as a well-managed city. •Serve as Acting City Administrator in the absence of the City Administrator. •Supervise the City Clerk and Finance Divisions Manager, City Clerk, Planner, Recreation Supervisor, and collateral staff. o Coordinate and supervise the Finance Manager City Clerk, Planner, Recreation Supervisor, and their activities. o Perform a variety of supervisory tasks including interviewing candidates, recommending person(s) to be hired, determines work assignments, scheduling, conducts performance appraisals and disciplinary matters. o Establishes a team environment that encourages open communication and empowers staff to take ownership in position and organization in a manner that supports the vision and direction of the City and enhances employee satisfaction. City of Corcoran At ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 2 o Oversees contract information technology services. Prepares and manages the Administration Department budget. •Serve as the Human Resource Director o Oversee all aspects of human resource management including job postings, establish hiring criteria, interviewing, administer scoring exams, prepare eligibility lists, workers compensation and personnel related compliance programs (EEO/AA, FLSA, ADA, Veteran’s Preference, FMLA coordination etc.) employee benefits program coordination, drug and alcohol testing, and other human resource programs o Oversee risk management functions, including safety and Workers’ Compensation, ensure appropriate processing of claims, correcting of violations, and return to work process. o Coordinate with departments to administer the City’s performance evaluation programs and human resource records retention program. o Assist the City Administrator in the administration and development of personnel city policies, development recruitment, and selection of employees. o Ensures compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws affecting human resources; o Advise supervisors on disciplinary matters and counseling employees; advise on policies and procedures; answer questions, mediate disputes, investigate complaints. o Participates in labor negotiations by preparing impact analysis and recommends the City position on contract matters. o Oversee the employee recognition program. o Coordinate employee training opportunities. o Coordinates the City’s Safety Committee. o Work with the Leadership Team to implement organization wide culture initiatives. •Coordinate key City contracts including information technology and recycling. •Serve as the liaison for the Charter Commission. Coordinates meetings, prepares correspondence and staffs the Charter Commission meetings. •Implement the City’s Communication strategies. Work with the City Administrator and City Clerk to compose and execute a communication strategy and guides the creation of City’s digital and non- digital communication. •Perform other duties and activities as assigned. Minimum Qualifications Bachelor’s degree in business, accounting, public administration or closely related field; four five or more progressively responsible years of related experience, or equivalent. Valid driver’s license. Desired Qualifications Two years of experience as a City Clerk or Finance Manager; two years of experience working for a municipal government, a master’s degree in business, accounting, public administration or closely ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 3 related field, certification by the Minnesota Clerks and Finance Officers Association as a Minnesota Certified Municipal Clerk, experience managing or assisting with the management of federal, state, and local elections, experience supervising full-time employees. Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance •Customer service skills including demonstrated ability to build positive relationships with employees and managers. •Knowledge of the functions and responsibilities of city departments, staff, and key community members. •Knowledge of public information laws, rules, and regulations applicable to city government. •Knowledge of and ability to operate accounting software and standard office software, including strong Excel skills sufficient to manipulate data, draft reports and maintain records. •Ability to analyze and resolve problems. •Ability to perform research, assemble information, and prepare reports and studies. •Ability to exercise initiative, discretion, and independence of judgment. •Ability to work effectively under pressure and to competently handle numerous diverse tasks in a single time-period. •Ability to plan and perform duties with minimal supervision. •The ability to work independently and to prioritize work requests; ability to plan coordinate and prioritize workload to meet project deadlines. •Verbal and high-level written communication skills sufficient to effectively present information and respond to questions from a wide variety of audiences, and reading comprehension skills sufficient to read, understand and interpret complex and varied work-related materials. •Knowledge of data privacy laws and ability to maintain highest confidentiality when dealing with sensitive or private information. •Promote and adhere to the City of Corcoran workplace values of accountability, teamwork, and commitment to the city’s goals and measures. Physical and Mental Requirements Physical effort is light, with lifting or carrying up to 25 pounds intermittently. Report preparation and word processing will at times require extended use of a keyboard. Work interruptions are frequent. The Administrative Services Director must be able to use judgment to respond to situations occurring during the absence of the Administrator. Travel within the City or region to attend meetings is likely. There is occasional exposure to field or construction site conditions when visiting or meeting at properties within the City. Working Conditions Work is performed in a normal office environment. Attendance at evening meetings is required. Work may involve dealing with and calming individuals who are emotionally charged over an issue. The Administrative Services Director may be the person to whom a complaint is delivered by a citizen or referred by an employee and work may involve dealing with and calming individuals who are emotionally charged over an issue. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 4 Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator retains the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. PLANNER ©City of Corcoran 2023 1 Description The Planner serves as a primary point of contact for citizens with questions about city codes, planning applications, and planning processes. The Planner implements the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance by coordinating and monitoring development projects to ensure all applicable City official adopted plans, studies, policies, and ordinances and permits applications are complied with. The Planner coordinates the City’s code enforcement efforts. The Planner works under the supervision of the Administrative Services Director and is expected to perform assigned duties without a need for significant work direction on daily tasks. The Planner is the City Liaison to the Planning Commission which will require occasional evening work hours. The position is responsible for supervising the planning technician position and providing work direction as needed to the contract code enforcement position. Essential Duties and Responsibilities •Community Development/Zoning Administration (Land Use and Planning) o Process land use applications, including receiving, setting up project files, distribution, public hearing notices, developing or producing city checklists and reports per city, county, state, and federal requirements. o Prepare planning reports and supporting data, including recommendations. o Prepare and update planning policies and programs (i.e., comprehensive plans, zoning, sign and subdivision ordinances). o Present items as required to the Planning Commission, Parks and Trails Commission, and City Council. o Assist in the development of the City's Comprehensive Plan. o Maintain land use and planning files. o Explain zoning ordinance and city code requirements to residents, property owners, businesses, and interested citizens; develops and maintains handouts explaining policies and procedures. o Prepare and administer grants by identifying sources, completing applications, and following grant requirements. o Issue Administrative permits, complete inspections, reports, presentations, and special projects as needed, conferring with Contract City Planner and Engineer as needed. o Administer the Home Occupation Program and Rental Program. o Coordinate and facilitate community neighborhood meetings. o Create and maintain City maps using the City’s GIS software. •Act as liaison to the Planning Commission o Attend the monthly meetings. o Research and compile information on project questions or concerns. City of Corcoran Department: Administration Reports To: Administrative Services Director Points: 311 Grade: 11 FLSA: Non-Exempt Bargaining Unit: NA Revision Date: July 2023 Attachment: 10b3. PLANNER ©City of Corcoran 2023 2 •Manage the Code Enforcement contract ensuring that code enforcement activities continue. o Coordinate complaints and work with residents, property owners, businesses, and interested citizens to find solutions and options to resolving compliance problems within the city code. o Coordinate with City employees and contract services to resolve zoning and code violations. o Assist with court proceedings to resolve zoning ordinance and city code violations as required and prepare citation and background information as needed. o Prepare and make public presentations to report on activities, community issues, and related projects when called upon. •Perform other duties and activities as assigned. Minimum Qualifications Bachelor’s degree with coursework in housing, urban studies, public affairs/administration, planning or related field or equivalent combination of education and experience. Valid driver’s license. Desired Qualifications Experience in municipal planning and knowledge of governmental practices and policies, including working with boards and commissions. Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance •Ability to analyze and resolve problems. •Customer service skills including demonstrated ability to build positive relationships and work well with employees, contractors, and the public. •Strong interpersonal and communication skills in dealing with difficult situations and people. •Ability to quickly learn, understand, interpret, and apply City codes and zoning ordinances as well as all applicable federal and state laws. •Knowledge of the functions and responsibilities of City Departments, staff, and key community members. •Ability to perform in a professional and courteous manner in responding to requests from the public and other staff members. •Ability to maintain a positive attitude toward work, the public, and coworkers. •Knowledge of and ability to operate standard office software sufficient to manipulate data, draft reports and maintain records. •Verbal and high-level written communication skills sufficient to effectively present information and respond to questions from a wide variety of audiences, and reading comprehension skills sufficient to read, understand and interpret complex and varied work-related materials. •Ability to understand and carry out verbal and/or written instructions efficiently and effectively. PLANNER ©City of Corcoran 2023 3 •Problem-solving skills to gather relevant information to solve practical problems and address citizen inquiries and concerns. •Demonstrates the desired standard of conduct and work performance including confidentiality and privacy requirements of City employees. •Ability to work independently, manage time, prioritize work, and meet project deadlines without constant supervision. •Ability to work with neighboring municipalities and outside professional organizations to continue to learn and bring efficiencies within our organization. •Ability to perform research, assemble information, and prepare reports and studies. •Promote and adhere to the City of Corcoran workplace values of accountability, teamwork, and commitment to the City’s goals and measures. Physical and Mental Requirements Physical effort is light, with lifting or carrying up to 25 pounds intermittently. Report preparation and word processing will at times require extended use of a keyboard. Work interruptions are frequent. Working Conditions Work is performed in a normal office environment. May be the first person to whom a complaint is delivered by a citizen and may involve dealing with and calming individuals who are emotionally charged over an issue. Work includes driving within the City of Corcoran to observe conditions that require attention and visiting sites related to applications or complaints. Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator retains the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. PLANNER ©City of Corcoran 2023 1 Job Summary: Description The Planner serves as a primary point of contact for citizens with questions about city codes, planning applications, and planning processes. The Planner implements the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance by coordinating and monitoring development projects to ensure all applicable City official adopted plans, studies, policies, ordinances, and permit applications are complied with. The Planner coordinates the City’s code enforcement efforts. The Planner works under the supervision of the City Administrator Administrative Services Director and is expected to perform assigned duties without a need for significant work direction on daily tasks. The Planner is the City Liaison to the Planning Commission which will require occasional evening work hours. Supervisory responsibility The position includes oversight of the part-time planning administrative assistant position as well as providing work direction for contract code enforcement is responsible for supervising the planning technician position and providing work direction as needed to the contract code enforcement position. Scope of Impact: The Planner works under the supervision of the City Administrator and is expected to perform assigned duties without a need for significant work direction on daily tasks. The Planner is the City Liaison to the Planning Commission which will require some nighttime work hours. Supervisory responsibility includes oversight of the part-time planning administrative assistant position as well as providing work direction for contract code enforcement. Essential Duties and ResponsibilitiesCommunity Development/Zoning Administration (Land Use and Planning) o Process land use applications, including receiving, setting up project files, distribution, public hearing notices, developing or producing city checklists and reports per city, county, state, and federal requirements. o Prepare planning reports and supporting data, including recommendations. o Prepare and update planning policies and programs (i.e., comprehensive plans, zoning, sign and subdivision ordinances). o Present items as required to the Planning Commission, Parks and Trails Commission, and City Council. o Assist in the development of the City's Comprehensive Plan. o Maintain land use and planning files. o Explain zoning ordinance and city code requirements to residents, property owners, businesses, and interested citizens; develops and maintains handouts explaining policies and procedures. o Prepare and administer grants by identifying sources, completing applications, and following grant requirements.Issue Administrative permits, complete inspections, reports, presentations, and special projects as needed, conferring with Contract City Planner and Engineer as needed. City of Corcoran Department: Administration Reports To: City Administrator Administrative Services Director Points: 311 Grade: 11 FLSA: Non-Exempt Bargaining Unit: NA Revision Date: March 2020 July 2023 PLANNER ©City of Corcoran 2023 2 o o Work with the City Finance Department to develop a clear, comprehensive, and accurate annual operating budget. o Administer the Home Occupation Program. and Rental Program.Coordinate and facilitate community neighborhood meetings. Act as liaison to the Planning Commission o Attend the monthly meetings. o Researchand compileinformation on project questions or concerns. o Manage the Code Enforcement contract ensuring that Code Enforcement activities continue. Coordinate complaints and works with residents, property owners, businesses, and interested citizens to find solutions and options to resolving compliance problems within the city code, Coordinate with City employees and contract services to resolve zoning and code violations. Assist with court proceedings to resolve zoning ordinance and city code violations as required, and prepare citation and background information as needed. o Prepare and make public presentations to report on activities, community issues, and related projects when called upon. o Create and maintain City maps using the City’s GIS software. Performs other duties and activities as assigned. Minimum Qualifications Bachelor’s degree with coursework in housing, urban studies, public affairs/administration, planning or related field or equivalent combination of education and experience. Valid driver’s license. Desired Qualifications Desired qualifications include Experience in municipal planning and knowledge of governmental practices and policies, including working with boards and commissions. Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance: •Ability to analyze and resolve problems. • • Customer service skills including demonstrated ability to build positive relationships and work well with employees, contractors, and the public. •Strong interpersonal and communication skills in dealing with difficult situations and people. •Ability to quickly learn, understand, interpret, and apply City codes and zoning ordinances as well as all applicable federal and state laws. •Knowledge of the functions and responsibilities of City Departments, staff, and key community members. PLANNER ©City of Corcoran 2023 3 •Ability to perform in a professional and courteous manner in responding to requests from the public and other staff members. •Ability to maintain a positive attitude toward work, the public, and coworkers. •Knowledge of and ability to operate standard office software sufficient to manipulate data, draft reports and maintain records. •The ability to work independently manage time, prioritize work, and meet project deadlines without constant supervision. •Verbal and high-level written communication skills sufficient to effectively present information and respond to questions from a wide variety of audiences, and reading comprehension skills sufficient to read, understand and interpret complex and varied work-related materials. • • Ability to understand and carry out verbal and/or written instructions efficiently and effectively. •Problem-solving skills to gather relevant information to solve practical problems and address citizen inquiries and concerns. •Demonstrates the desired standard of conduct and work performance including confidentiality and privacy requirements of City employees. •Ability to work independently, •Ability to work with neighboring municipalities and outside professional organizations to continue to learn and bring efficiencies within our organization. •Ability to perform research, assemble information, and prepare reports and studies. •Ability to exercise initiative, discretion, and independence of judgment. •Ability to work effectively under pressure and to competently handle numerous diverse tasks in a single time-period. •Promote and adhere to the City of Corcoran workplace values of accountability, teamwork, and commitment to the City’s goals and measures. Physical and Mental Requirements Physical effort is light, with lifting or carrying up to 25 pounds intermittently. Report preparation and word processing will at times require extended use of a keyboard. Work interruptions are frequent. Working Conditions Work is performed in a normal office environment. May be the first person to whom a complaint is delivered by a citizen and may involve dealing with and calming individuals who are emotionally charged over an issue. Work includes driving within the City of Corcoran to observe conditions that require attention and visiting sites related to applications or complaints. Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator retains the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. RECREATION SUPERVISOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 1 Description The Recreation Supervisor is responsible for coordinating and supervising recreation, community activities, and assisting in parks and trails planning for the City of Corcoran. They are responsible for planning and overseeing a variety of youth and adult recreation programs and community events. This includes registration, scheduling, supervising seasonal employees and volunteers and overall coordination. The Recreation Supervisor serves as the liaison to the Parks and Trails Commission. They will assist in the design and development of the park system. Essential Duties and Responsibilities •Develop, implement, supervise, and evaluate recreation programs, activities, and services that meet the needs of the public meeting long and short-term goals of the city. o Obtain and organize inventory and supplies for recreation programs. o Work with outside vendors for apparel, equipment, photography, and registration needs. o Monitor and maintain registration software, refund requests, and late registrations. o Collaborate and coordinate with city departments to ensure park and recreation needs and activities are accomplished. o Assist in the coordination of community events such as Country Daze and Night to Unite. o Conduct research to identify, evaluate, and make recommendations on current recreation programs that are of value and interest to the community or a modification of an existing program. o Assist the public with general information via phone calls, email, and in person. •Create, monitor, and review recreation programming and facility rental budgets. o Work with the City Finance Department to develop a clear, comprehensive, and accurate annual operating budget, which defines the city’s Parks and Recreation Division current and future needs, general operation, and recreation programming. o Analyze and adjust annual budget to ensure cost-effectiveness and maximize available resources. o Plan, oversee, assist, and implement revenue generation opportunities from sources other than tax levies through user fees, matching grants, corporate and civic sponsorships, and rentals. o Evaluate adequacy of park rental prices on the City’s fee schedule on an on-going basis. o Prepare and administer grants by identifying sources, completing applications, and following grant requirements. Department Administration Reports To Administrative Services Director Points 274 Grade 10 FLSA Non-Exempt Bargaining Unit N/A Revision Date July 2023 City of Corcoran AAttachment: 10b4. RECREATION SUPERVISOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 2 •Supervise staff and volunteers in the Parks and Recreation Division. o Assist Human Resource drafting job descriptions, hiring announcements, and interviewing applicants for seasonal recreation and volunteer positions. o Conduct staff training, and supervise seasonal employees to include, the Program Coordinator, Ice Rink Attendants, referees, and volunteer positions. o Oversee the scheduling and tasking of duties of the Program Coordinator, Ice Rink Attendants, referees, and volunteers to successfully accomplish goals associated with each position. o Adjust schedule to backfill recreation employees shifts, as needed. •Serve as the staff liaison to the Parks and Trails Commission. o Draft and assemble proposals, reports, memos, and agenda packet documents. o Attend and draft minutes from the public meetings. o Research and compile information on project questions or concerns. o Coordinates the creation and retention of agenda packets and minutes in accordance with the State Records Retention Schedule. o Update the Commission during meetings on department projects and updates. •Monitor trends to identify and propose parks and trails related ideas that meet community needs. o Assist in evaluating parks and trails, and facility, design proposals. o Identify, organize, and engage resident groups and outside agencies. Coordinate input, arrange and facilitate public meetings, prepare, and present information, and identify community needs by collecting and compiling data from a variety of sources. o Assist with analyzing accessibility of facilities and make access improvement recommendations. o Gather technical information to assist in developing request for proposals for park projects. o Act as a point of contact on assigned proposals. o Oversee park facilities policies and reservations in cooperation with the Public Works staff. Supervise public use of park facilities in cooperation with Public Works staff to ensure pavilion, athletic fields, and courts are in a safe, usable condition. o Notify the public and in-house users of any field closures. o Maintain park signage to include proper posting, policies and regulations pertaining to parks, facilities, and field usage that enhance user safety and enjoyment. o Monitor and maintain facility rental agreements and refunds/damage deposit returns. o Maintain control of Field and Pavilion Reservation Agreements in accordance with the State Records Retention Schedule. •Performs other duties and activities as assigned. Minimum Qualifications •Bachelor’s degree in Recreation, Parks and Leisure Service, or related field. •Two years of experience in Park and Recreation to include supervisory experience, or equivalent experience. •1-2 years of experience coordinating youth and adult sports programs and events. •Ability to work a flexible schedule including evenings and weekends. •Must obtain and maintain first aid and CPR certifications. RECREATION SUPERVISOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 3 Desired Qualifications •4 years of experience coordinating youth and adult sports programs and events. Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance •Customer service skills including demonstrated ability to build positive relationships and work well with employees, contractors, and the public. •Ability to understand and carry out verbal and/or written instructions efficiently and effectively. •Knowledge of and ability to operate standard office software sufficient to manipulate data, draft reports and maintain records. •Problem-solving skills to gather relevant information to solve practical problems and address citizen inquiries and concerns. •Verbal and high-level written communication skills sufficient to effectively present information and respond to questions from a wide variety of audiences, and reading comprehension skills sufficient to read, understand and interpret complex and varied work-related materials. •Demonstrates the desired standard of conduct and work performance including confidentiality and privacy requirements of city employees. •Ability to analyze and resolve problems. •Ability to work independently, manage time, prioritize work, and meet project deadlines without constant supervision. •Ability to work with neighboring municipalities and outside professional organizations to continue to learn and bring efficiencies within our organization. •Ability to perform research, assemble information, and prepare reports and studies. •Ability to exercise initiative, discretion, and independence of judgment. •Ability to work effectively under pressure and to competently handle numerous diverse tasks in a single time-period. •Promote and adhere to the City of Corcoran workplace values of accountability, teamwork, and commitment to the city’s goals and measures. Physical and Mental Requirements Physical effort is medium, with lifting or carrying up to 50 pounds intermittently. Frequent walking, standing, reaching, sitting, and bending. Working Conditions Work is performed both inside and outside an office environment. Working conditions can be dependent on weather forecasts and may include occasional inclement weather including heat, humidity, cold, rain, and wind. There is exposure to a variety of weather conditions, dirt, grease, noise, biting insects and unpleasant odors. Some work requires wearing safety apparel. May work varied hours, including evenings and weekends, to attend events, observe or participate in program coordination, and respond to user needs. RECREATION SUPERVISOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 4 Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator retains the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. RECREATION SUPERVISOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 1 Job Summary: Description The Recreation Supervisor is responsible for coordinating and supervising recreation, community activities, and assisting in parks and trails planning for the City of Corcoran. They are responsible for planning and overseeing a variety of youth and adult recreation programs and community events. This includes registration, scheduling, supervising seasonal employees and volunteers and overall coordination. The Recreation Supervisor serves as the liaison to the Parks and Trails Commission. They will assist in the design and development of the park system. Scope of Impact: The Recreation Supervisor is responsible for planning and overseeing a variety of youth and adult programs and community events. This includes registration, scheduling, staff supervision, and overall coordination. The Recreation Supervisor serves as the liaison to the Parks and Trails Commission and assists in the design and development of the park system. Essential Duties and Responsibilities •Plans, designs, initiates, Develop, implement, supervise, and evaluate recreation programs, activities, and services that provide high quality leisure opportunities for all segments of Corcoran’s population. that meet the needs of the public meeting long and short-term goals of the city. o Assist in obtaining and organizing Obtain and organize inventory and supplies for recreation programs. o Oversees vendor relations Work with outside vendors for apparel, equipment, photography, and registration needs. o Monitor and maintain registration software, refund requests, and late registrations. o Collaborate and coordinate with city departments to ensure park and recreation needs and activities are accomplished. o Serves as the liaison Assist in the coordination for of community events such as Country Daze and Night to Unite. o Conduct research to identify, evaluate, and make recommendations on current recreation programs that are of value and interest to the community or a modification of an existing program. evaluates program effectiveness and viability; makes recommendations on new programs or modifications of existing programs to meet community needs. o Assist the public with general information via phone calls, email, and in person. •Create, monitor, and review recreation programming and facility rental budgets. Department Parks and Recreation Administration Reports To City Administrator Administrative Services Director Points 274 Grade 10 FLSA Non-Exempt Bargaining Unit N/A Revision Date October 2021 July 2023 City of Corcoran RECREATION SUPERVISOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 2 o Work with the City Finance Department to develop a clear, comprehensive, and accurate annual operating budget, which defines the city’s Parks and Parks and Recreation Division current and future needs, general operation, and recreation programming. o Analyze and adjust annual budget to ensure cost-effectiveness and maximize available resources. o Plan, oversee, assist, and implement revenue generation opportunities from sources other than tax levies through user fees, matching grants, corporate and civic sponsorships, and rentals. o Evaluate adequacy of park rental prices on the City’s fee schedule on an on-going basis. o Prepare and administer grants by identifying sources, completing applications, and following grant requirements. •Supervise staff and volunteers in the Parks and Recreation Division as well as Ice Rink Attendants. o Prepares and coordinates the posting of Assist Human Resource drafting job descriptions and hiring announcements, and interviewing applicants on various platforms for seasonal recreation and volunteer positions. o Supervises the hiring process including interviewing, Conduct staff training, and onboarding of and supervise seasonal employees to include, the Program Coordinator, Ice Rink Attendants, referees, and volunteer positions. o Processes background checks for potential employees as requested by department heads or City Administrator; communicates results to the appropriate individuals upon completion; o Oversee the scheduling and tasking of duties of the Program Coordinator, Ice Rink Attendants, referees, and volunteers and assists with direction of tasks and functions to successfully accomplish goals associated with each position. o Adjust schedule to backfill recreation employees shifts, as needed. •Serve as the staff liaison to the Parks and Trails Commission. o Draft and assemble proposals, reports, memos, and agenda packet documents. o Attend and draft minutes from the public meetings. o Research and compile information on project questions or concerns. o Coordinates the creation and retention of agenda packets and minutes in accordance with the State Records Retention Schedule. o Update the Commission during meetings on department projects and updates. •Monitor trends and needs of the city to identify and coordinate propose parks and trails related ideas that meet community demands needs. o Assist in evaluating parks and trails, and facility, design proposals. o Identify, organize, and engage resident groups and outside agencies. Coordinate input, arrange and facilitate public meetings, prepare and present information, and identify community needs by collecting and compiling data from a variety of sources. o Assist with analyzing accessibility of facilities and make access improvement recommendations. updates to improve access; o Gather technical information to assist in developing request for proposals for park projects. RECREATION SUPERVISOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 3 o Act as the central a point of contact on assigned proposals. •Prepares and maintains a variety of reports, correspondence, and documentation to ensure quality programs and services. o Provides information and responds to questions and feedback from the public; o Communicates regularly with neighboring jurisdictions to monitor user fees and rules, remain informed about programs of regional impact, and consider opportunities for cooperation; o Serves as liaison to other community event organizers, governmental parks and recreation departments, and park districts. o Oversee park facilities policies and reservations in cooperation with the Public Works Department staff. Supervise public use of park facilities in cooperation with Public Works staff to ensure pavilion, athletic fields, and courts are in a safe, usable condition. o Notify the public and in-house users of temporary any field closures. o Assists in developing and Maintaining park signage to include proper posting, policies and regulations pertaining to parks, facilities, and field usage that enhance user safety and enjoyment. o Develops positive relationships with individuals and groups utilizing the facilities and programs within the policies, procedures, and ordinances established by the city; o Monitor and maintain facility rental software, facility rental agreements and refunds/damage deposit returns. and facility rental agreements. o Maintain control of Field and Pavilion Reservation Agreements in accordance with the State Records Retention Schedule. o Promotes and provides updates to the community on upcoming programs, events, and projects. Manages writing, editing, and digital media content of the city’s social media outlets; o Coordinates the marketing and promotion of programs and events through appropriate channels including the newsletter, community outreach, social media, website, email blasts, and occasionally working at events as a representative of the city. •Performs other duties and activities as assigned. Minimum Qualifications •Bachelor’s degree in Recreation, Parks and Leisure Service, or related field. And •Two years of experience in Park and Recreation to include supervisory experience, or equivalent experience. supervising staff, recreation activities, project management, or similar. Must be able to successfully pass background and reference checks. •1-2 years of experience coordinating youth and adult sports programs and events. •Ability to work a flexible schedule including evenings and weekends. •Must obtain and maintain first aid and CPR certifications prior to the start of programming. Desired Qualifications •Experience with RegWerks and RevTrak software. •4 years of experience coordinating youth and adult sports programs and events. RECREATION SUPERVISOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 4 •Certified Park and Recreation Professional (CPRP). Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance •General customer service skills including ability to communicate rules and directions to others. •Ability to effectively communicate pertinent information to City Administrator, Public Works Superintendent, and the City Hall staff when necessary. •Customer service skills including demonstrated ability to build positive relationships and work well with employees, contractors, and the public. •Ability to understand and carry out verbal and/or written instructions efficiently and effectively. and to read and understand printed material. •Ability to work effectively with children and adults. •Basic computer processing skills including MS Office. •Ability to plan hours and work independently without constant supervision. •Knowledge of and ability to operate standard office software sufficient to manipulate data, draft reports and maintain records. •Problem-solving skills to gather relevant information to solve practical problems and address citizen inquiries and concerns. •Verbal and high-level written communication skills sufficient to effectively present information and respond to questions from a wide variety of audiences, and reading comprehension skills sufficient to read, understand and interpret complex and varied work-related materials. •Demonstrates the desired standard of conduct and work performance including confidentiality and privacy requirements of city employees. •Ability to analyze and resolve problems. •Ability to work independently, manage time, prioritize work, and meet project deadlines without constant supervision. •Ability to work with neighboring municipalities and outside professional organizations to continue to learn and bring efficiencies within our organization. •Ability to perform research, assemble information, and prepare reports and studies. •Ability to exercise initiative, discretion, and independence of judgment. •Ability to work effectively under pressure and to competently handle numerous diverse tasks in a single time-period. •Promote and adhere to the City of Corcoran workplace values of accountability, teamwork, and commitment to the city’s goals and measures. Physical and Mental Requirements Physical effort is medium, with lifting or carrying up to 50 pounds intermittently. Frequent walking, standing, reaching, sitting, and bending. Working Conditions Work is performed both inside and outside an office and at park facilities environment. Working conditions are can be dependent on weather forecasts and may include occasional inclement weather including heat, humidity, cold, rain, and wind. There is exposure to a variety of weather conditions, dirt, grease, noise, biting insects and unpleasant odors. Some work requires wearing safety apparel. May work varied hours, including evenings and weekends, to attend events, observe or participate in program coordination, and respond to user needs. RECREATION SUPERVISOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 5 Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator retains the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. Employee Signature and Date: ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Supervisor and / or Department Head Signature and Date: ______________________________________________________________________________________________ PROGRAM COORDINATOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 1 Description Plan, organize and coordinate the development and implementation of citywide recreation programs, activities, and special events at the direction of the Recreation Supervisor. The Program Coordinator receives work direction from the Recreation Supervisor. Essential Duties and Responsibilities •Under the direction of the Recreation Supervisor, the Program Coordinator organizes, supervises, and evaluates a variety of recreation programs. •Work independently and is responsible for overseeing programs at designated locations. Includes setting up and taking down of equipment at facilities and areas for special events. •Responsible for assignment of and return of program equipment and supplies. •Keep supervisor and other city staff informed on a timely basis of any development issues and concerns which may be needed to manage the division in an effective manner. •Books facility rentals, attend to facility user’s needs, including permits. email event schedule weekly to Public Works Department. •Collaborate with City Communications staff to publicizes recreation programs and other offerings. •Assist with the maintenance of playing fields (i.e., assembling and removing soccer nets, painting soccer field lines, etc.). •Performs other duties and activities as assigned. Minimum Qualifications •18 years of age or older •Valid driver’s license •High School Diploma or GED •Ability to work a flexible schedule including evenings Desired Qualifications •Experience in event and program planning •College student or graduate in the field of Recreation, Parks and Leisure Services, or a related field •Certification in CPR/First Aid Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance •Customer service skills including demonstrated ability to build positive relationships with city staff, employees, supervisors, elected officials, participants, and the public. •Knowledge of the functions and responsibilities of City Departments, staff, and key community members. City of Corcoran Department Administration Reports To Recreation Supervisor Points 174 Grade 4 FLSA Seasonal Part-time Bargaining Unit NA Revision Date July 2023 Attachment: 10b5. PROGRAM COORDINATOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 2 • Ability to take general direction and complete assignments in a timely and accurate manner. • Skilled in the use of common computer programs and standard office equipment. • Excellent planning, organizing, implementation, and communication skills. • Promote and adhere to the City of Corcoran workplace values of accountability, teamwork, and commitment to the city’s goals and measures. Physical and Mental Requirements Physical effort is medium, with lifting or carrying up to 50 pounds intermittently. Frequent walking, standing, reaching, sitting, and bending. Working Conditions: Work is performed both inside and outside an office environment. Working conditions can be dependent on weather forecasts and may include occasional inclement weather including heat, humidity, cold, rain, and wind. There is exposure to a variety of weather conditions, dirt, grease, noise, biting insects and unpleasant odors. Some work requires wearing safety apparel. May work varied hours, including evenings and weekends, to attend events, observe or participate in program coordination, and respond to user needs. Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator retains the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. PROGRAM COORDINATOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 1 DescriptionPlan, organize and coordinate the development and implementation of citywide recreation programs, activities and special events at the direction of the Recreation Supervisor. The Program Coordinator receives work direction from the Recreation Supervisor. Essential Duties and Responsibilities •Under the direction of the Recreation Supervisor, the Program Coordinator organizes, supervises, and evaluates a variety of recreation programs. •Work independently and is responsible for overseeing programs at designated locations. Includes setting up and taking down of equipment at facilities and areas for special events. •Responsible for assignment of and return of program equipment and supplies. •Keep supervisor and other city staff informed on a timely basis of any development issues and concerns which may be needed to manage the division in an effective manner. •Books facility rentals, attend to facility user’s needs, including permits. email event schedule weekly to Public Works Department. •Collaborate with City Communications staff to publicizes recreation programs and other offerings. •Assistwith the maintenance of playing fields (i.e. assembling and removing soccer nets, painting soccer field lines, etc.). Performs other duties and activities as assigned. Minimum Qualifications •18 years of age or older •Valid driver’s license •High School Diploma or GED •Ability to work a flexible schedule including evenings Desired Qualifications: •Experience in event and program planning •College student or graduate in the field of Recreation, Parks and Leisure Services, or a related field. •Certification in CPR/First Aid Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance: •Customer service skills including demonstrated ability to build positive relationships with city staff, employees, supervisors, elected officials, participants, and the public; •Knowledge of the functions and responsibilities of City Departments, staff, and key community members; •Ability to take general direction and complete assignments in a timely and accurate manner; • • Skilled in the use of common computer programs and standard office equipment. •Excellent planning, organizing, implementation, and communication skills. City of Corcoran Department Parks and Recreation Administration Reports To Recreation Supervisor Points 174 Grade 4 FLSA Part Time, Seasonal Bargaining Unit NA Revision Date July 2023 PROGRAM COORDINATOR ©City of Corcoran 2023 2 • • Promote and adhere to the City of Corcoran workplace values of accountability, teamwork, and commitment to the city’s goals and measures. Physical and Mental Requirements Physical effort is medium, with lifting or carrying up to 50 pounds intermittently. Frequent walking, standing, reaching, sitting, and bending. Working Conditions: Work is performed both inside and outside an office environment. Working conditions can be dependent on weather forecasts and may include occasional inclement weather including heat, humidity, cold, rain, and wind. There is exposure to a variety of weather conditions, dirt, grease, noise, biting insects and unpleasant odors. Some work requires wearing safety apparel. May work varied hours, including evenings and weekends, to attend events, observe or participate in program coordination, and respond to user needs. Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator retains the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item:10c. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Staff Planning – Organizational Chart Action Required: Approval Summary: The City of Corcoran has experienced significant growth in the past several years. With the growth of our community staffing needs continue to change. In 2019, the City operated with 23 full-time (FT) employees and 26 full-time equivalents (FTE) with a population of approximately 6,300. In 2022, staffing increased to 32 FT and 36 FTE as the population grew to approximately 7,400. The purpose of sharing the current and future organizational chart is not to obtain approval of staff plans, but to show the upcoming staffing needs based on approvals taking place today. As the City continues to grow staff will work to update the City organizational chart biannually. The request for additional staff will continue to follow the City’s current process of making requests to Council through a Staff Report. Financial/Budget: None. Information only. Recommendation: None. Council Action: 1.Discuss the organizational charts provide any feedback. Attachments: 1.City Organizational Chart Current 2.City Organizational Chart Future City of Corcoran Organizational Chart Current City Council City Administrator Administrative Services Director Finance Manager Accountant Accounting Clerk City Clerk Administrative Assistant Communications Assistant 0.5 FTE Election Judges (Volunteers) Planner Planning Technician Code Enforcement (Contract) Recreation Supervisor Summer Seasonal 0.25 FTE Rink Attendents 0.3 FTE Coaches (Volunteers) Information Technology (Contract) Planner (Contract) Public Works Director Operations Superintendent Operations Supervisor Crew Leader Maintenance Worker 4 FT 1 FT Summer Maintenance Worker 0.5 FTE Snot Plow Operator 0.2 FTE Utility Superintendent Utility Maintenance Worker Development Superintendent Engineering (Contract) Parks (Contract) Construction Services Supervisor Permit Technician Inspector (Contract) Administrative Assistant Public Safety Director Deputy Director of Public Safety Sergeant 1 FT 1 FT Police Officer 7 FT, 1 FT, 1 FTE Police Reserves (Volunteers) Detective Community Service Officer 1 FTE Office Manager Public Safety Administrative Assistant Fire (Contract) Commissions (Parks and Trails, Planning, Charter) City Attorney Attachment: 10c1. City of Corcoran Organizational Chart Future City Council City Administrator Administrative Services Director Finance Manager Accountant Accounting Clerk City Clerk Administrative Assistant Communications Assistant 1 FT Election Judges (Volunteers) Information Technology Manager Information Technology (Contract) Public Works Director Operations Superintendent Operations Supervisor Crew Leader Maintenance Worker 5 FT Summer Maintenance Worker 0.5 FTE Snow Plow Operator 0.2 FTE Engineering/ Development Superintendent Engineering (Contract) Utility Superintendent Utility Maintenance Worker Administrative Assistant Public Safety Director Deputy Director of Public Safety Sergeant 2 FT Police Officer 8 FT 1 FTE Police Reserves (Volunteers) Detective 1 FT 1 FT Community Service Officer 1 FTE Deputy Director/Fire Chief Fire (Contract)Medical Duty Crew Office Manager Public Safety Administrative Assistant Community Development Director Planner Planning Technician Construction Services Supervisor Permit Technician Building Offical/Fire Marshal (Contract) Recreation Supervisor Summer Seasonal 0.25 FTE Rink Attendants 0.3 FTE Coaches (Volunteers) Planner (Contract) Code Enforcement (Contract) Park Planning (Contract) Commissions (Parks and Trails, Planning, Charter) City Attorney Attachment: 10c2. Agenda Item 11a. Page 1 of 3 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov MEMO Meeting Date: July 27, 2023 To: City Council From: Dwight Klingbeil, Planning Technician Re: Active Corcoran Planning Applications Projects/comments in blue italics are new. The following is a status summary of active planning projects: 1. Rental Ordinance (City File No. 22-046). Staff and City Council continue to work through the draft ordinance and planning for administrative implementation. After several discussions and revisions, this Ordinance was adopted at the June 22, 2023, Council Meeting. 2. Hope Community Sketch Plat (PID 11-119-23-14-0003) (City File No. 22- 074). Brian Lother submitted a concept plan application for a proposed residential and mixed-use development on the properties surrounding Hope Community Church. The concept includes medical offices, retail space, market rate apartments, townhomes, senior villas, and some assisted living units. The Council authorized EAW distribution at the May 25, 2023, regular meeting. The comment period for the EAW concluded on July 6 and the Notice of Decision is scheduled for the July 27, 2023, Council meeting. 3. “Kwik Trip CUP, Lot Line Adjustment, and Site Plan” (PID 12-119-23-14- 0006; 12- 119-23-14-0004) (City File No. 23-006). Kwik Trip Inc. submitted a Site Plan, Lot Line Adjustment and CUP application for the two parcels north of Mama G’s. The application was determined to be incomplete for City review and is not currently scheduled for review by the City Council. A feasibility study was required to evaluate the infrastructure needs of the project. The infrastructure feasibility study has been distributed to the applicant. This item is not currently scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 4. “Red Barn Pet Retreat” (PID 01-119-23-44-0045) (City File No. 23-008) Daniel Benjamin submitted an application for the expansion of his business, “Red Barn Pet Retreat” to a site on the Northwest corner of Stieg Road and County Road 101. This application includes a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit, Variance, and a Site Plan. Agenda Item 11a. Page 2 of 3 Due to last minute additions and insufficient materials, this item was continued at the July 6, 2023, Planning Commission meeting. The applicant was not able to meet the deadline for the August Planning Commission meeting and has requested that the review period be extended another 90 days. 5. Heidecker Garage (PID 22-119-23-42-0009) (City File No. 23-009) Tyler Heidecker applied for a Conditional Use Permit and an Interim Use Permit to construct a detached garage of 1750 square feet on his property at 7985 Eagle Ridge Road. The IUP will allow for storage of business equipment within the structure. After the Public Hearing on July 6, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit and the Interim Use Permit. This item is scheduled for the July 27, 2023, Council meeting. 6. Expansion of Nonconforming Residential Structures Zoning Ordinance Amendment (Citywide) (City File No. 23-011). Council directed staff to move forward with a minor zoning ordinance amendment which would allow some expansions of legal nonconforming residential structures to be approved administratively. This item was adopted at the June 22, 2023 Council meeting. 7. Leuer Sketch Plat (PID 25-119-23-11-0001) (City File No. 23-013) Bergeron Homes and Development, Inc. submitted a sketch plat for a residential development consisting of 75 single-family lots at the Geur farm directly west of Cook Lake, otherwise known as the “Leuer property.” The sketch plat includes minimum lot-widths of 55 feet, with 24 lots being at least 70 feet wide. The applicant received Council feedback at the June 22, 2023, meeting and is not scheduled for any upcoming meetings. 8. Bennett Garage CUP (PID 05-119-23-34-0019) (City File No. 23-014) Lee Bennett submitted a Conditional Use Permit application for a detached garage with sidewalls exceeding 10 feet in height in the front yard of 10208 Hage Drive. This item is complete for review and is scheduled for the August 3, 2023, Planning Commission Meeting. 9. Sunram IUP (PID 26-119-23-21-0006) (City File No. 23-015) Ryan Sunram applied for an Interim Use Permit to allow staging and stockpiling soil for construction projects at 20305 County Road 50. This item is being reviewed for completeness. If complete, this item could be reviewed as early as September by the Planning Commission and City Council. 10. Corcoran Storage II (PID 31-119-23-33-0001) (City File No. 23-016) Scherber and Associates, LLC. applied for a Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Variance, and a Rezoning to allow a 6-building storage facility at 23730 Highway 55. This item is complete for review and is scheduled for the August 3, 2023, Planning Commission meeting. 11. NE Hackamore 116 Sketch Plat (PID 36-119-23-33-0010) (City File No. 23- 017) Gonyea Company and Lakeview Development submitted a sketch plat application for a home development on the northeast corner of Hackamore Road and County Road 116. The concept is to rezone 36.75 acres from Single Family Residential 2 (RSF-2) to Single Family and Two Family Residential (RSF-3) to allow the development of 66 single family homes with a minimum lot Agenda Item 11a. Page 3 of 3 width of 65’. This item is scheduled for the July 27, 2023, Council Meeting. 12. Kariniemi/Jensen Concept Plan (PID 11-119-23-21-0002) (City File No. 23-018) Nate Kariniemi submitted a concept plan for a proposed Open Space and Preservation plat subdivision at 20400 County Road 30. The concept consists of 16 single-family lots ranging from 1-2.2 acres and a 52.4-acre outlot. This item is scheduled for the July 27, 2023, Council meeting. Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 11b. City Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Dwight Klingbeil Topic: 2023 Code Compliance Summary Action Required: Informational Background The City of Corcoran code compliance helps enforce the laws and ordinances of the City regarding zoning and property maintenance issues. Code compliance is conducted on a complaint basis. If the City receives a call with a complaint about a property, the Code Compliance Official will inspect the site following the process outlined below. Generally, the City receives a call from a resident describing a violation on a property in their area or one that they frequently drive by. In all cases with code compliance, the goal is to work with the property owner to bring their property into compliance with the City Code. 1.Analysis The Corcoran code compliance process is as follows: 1.A complaint is received by the City. 2.The subject property inspected by the Code Compliance Official or designee to verify whether it is compliant with City Code. Photographs are taken to verify any issues. 3.A first notice of violation letter is submitted to the property owner which describes the violation, steps (if necessary) to abate the violation and estimated date for a property compliance reinspection. a.Some first notice letters are informational for property owners to avoid future compliance issues, such as dumping lawn clippings in a wetland buffer or pushing snow across a public right-of-way. 4.The Code Compliance Official (or designee) reinspects the property to determine whether or not the violation has been abated. If so, the case is closed. 5.If the issue was not addressed, a formal violation notice is submitted to the property owner which describes the violation, steps to abate the violation and estimated date for a second property compliance reinspection. 6.The formal violation notice is forwarded to the City Attorney for prosecution if the subject property is not in compliance on the date of the second reinspection if the property owner has not entered into an alternative abatement plan with the City. Page 2 of 3 The first notice of violation letter was implemented in early 2022 as a new tool for code compliance. The intent of the first notice letter is to engage property owners with code violations in a less aggressive manner than a citation and to clearly define the code violation with steps necessary to resolve the issue. Relevant department contacts are provided if the property owner needs to apply for a permit or zoning application. After the reinspection, the Code Compliance Official reaches out to the property owner to follow up on the status of the violation, close the case, or note the necessary steps to complete abatement. Previously, a citation was sent to property owners that required compliance (or agreement of an abatement plan) by a certain date or the matter would be presented to the City Attorney to seek compliance through appropriate criminal or civil remedies. The first notice letter has been a successful tool in creating a dialogue with property owners to better understand the code violation issue and offer solutions to bring their property into compliance. The first notice letter also works well for informational purposes to notify property owners of minor violations or remind them of pertinent nuisance standards. Instances such as this may not necessitate reinspection and the information provided can help avoid future violations. 2. 2023 Code Compliance Overview Code compliance statistics to date (01/01/2023 to 7/21/2023): Total Inspections 47 New Inspections 20 Necessitated Intervention 17 First Notice Letters 15 Property owners working with CE to reach compliance 15 Violations resolved 10 Formal violations and Inspection Reports 7 From January 1, 2023, to July 21, 2023, Code Enforcement has conducted 45 inspections, including 18 new inspections. Of the 18 new inspections, 15 necessitated interventions from the city. The department sent 13 first notice letters and coordinated with 10 of these property owners. There have been 7 formal violations issued this year, 4 of which come from 2023 cases. The other 3 are violations of outstanding properties from previous years. Of the 15 properties requiring intervention: 7 have been resolved, 5 are working to reach compliance, and 3 are currently outstanding. There have been a variety of violation types, with some properties having multiple violations. Of the 15 interventions from 2023: Page 3 of 3 • Four violations were related to Building Nuisances. Building nuisances received a First Notice Letter in effort to open a dialogue with the homeowner and find a path toward compliance. This method has been successful with each building nuisance violation being abated or actively working toward abatement. • Three notices were issued for Weed Violations. Weed and tall grass violations receive a formal violation notice upon the first inspection of the nuisance due to the time sensitive nature in which weed, and tall grass violations must be abated. For example, Canadian Thistle is a noxious weed should be abated as quickly as possible to reduce further seed dispersal. • Three notices were issued for Home Occupation Violations. First notice letters are sent to the property owner to open a dialogue and understand the business operations. • Two or less notices for each of the following: Animal Nuisance, operating outside of allowed Construction Hours, Parking and Loading, Public Obstruction, and Storage Nuisance. • There have also been numerous sign violations that are not reflected in the data of this section. For these violations, Code Enforcement reaches out to the contact number on the sign to coordinate abatement. Abatement typically involves removal of the sign or applying for a sign permit. Aside from new cases, Code Enforcement has also worked on 7 compliance issues from previous years. Four properties were reinspected multiple times to provide the City Attorney with compliance updates when property owners were due in court for prosecution. Two of these violations have been resolved with the other 2 being long-term abatement projects. These larger abatement projects have been making slow improvements, but Code Enforcement continues to schedule regular check-ins with the property owners to ensure continued improvement. 3. Summary First notice letters and open dialogue strategies were introduced in 2022 and saw positive changes to the Code Enforcement process, this has continued into 2023. Continued dialogue with property owners has seen more positive interactions and willingness to work toward compliance. The Code Enforcement staff continue to believe this strategy is more effective for long term code compliance. Working with property owners on abatement plans is still the main goal rather than abatement prescribed through the courts. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 11c. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Maggie Ung Topic: Finance Assistance Update Action Required: None - Informational Summary On May 25, 2023, City Council authorized staff to request audit and escrow reconciliation assistance from Abdo Financial Solutions. Staff would like to provide an update on the process. When the City implemented our financial software BS&A, the data transfer caused a significant discrepancy in the City's current finances. Abdo is working through this discrepancy and has put in over 13.25 hours. To date, approximately $4,200 has been spent out of the $17,000 requested. If funds remain after the audit assistance, Abdo Financial Solutions will assist in reconciling the City’s escrow activities. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 11d. Council Meeting: July 27, 2023 Prepared By: Maggie Ung Topic: Financial Performance Report Action Required: None - Informational Summary Attached to this report is the unaudited Financial Performance Report, which shows the status of the budget through June 2023 along with a projected financial position for 2023. 2023 will be audited in mid-2024 and will provide the final 2023 financial performance of the City. The report also shows a projected year-end balance for 2022. The audit will provide the final 2022 financial performance of the City, which will be presented after the financial assistance is completed. Overall, the report shows a projected surplus of $113,303.45 in the General Fund for 2023. The major factor attributed to the surplus is due to delays in budgeted staff start date. Budgeted staff that has not yet been hired includes Development Superintendent, Public Works Maintenance Worker, and Public Works Administrative Assistant. These positions are anticipated to be filled by year-end. Financial/Budget 2023 is anticipated to be audited mid-2024. Surplus funds may be allocated to different uses or used to build up the City’s reserve funds. Council Action None Attachments 1.Financial Performance Report END BALANCE YTD BALANCE 2023 AVAILABLE % BUDGET YEAR END VARIANCEGL NUMBER DESCRIPTION 12/31/2022 06/30/2023 AMENDED BUDGET BALANCE REMAINING PROJECTION BUDGET VS. YEPCOMMENTSRevenues100‐00000‐31000 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES 5,099,598.42 2,700,000.00 6,354,020.00 3,654,020.0057.51% 6,354,020.000.00100‐00000‐31020 DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAXES49,456.120.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐00000‐31040 FISCAL DISPARITIES0.000.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐00000‐32100 BUSINESS LICENSE & PERMITS576.00450.0010,350.009,900.0095.65%10,350.000.00100‐00000‐32110 ALCOHOL/TOBACCO LICENSES15,675.0015,475.0015,500.0025.000.16%15,475.0025.00100‐00000‐32210 BUILDING PERMITS631,355.43 468,397.02 1,300,000.00 831,602.9863.97% 818,700.00 481,300.00Moved revenue to new line items100‐00000‐32220 GAS INSTALLATION PERMITS13,200.006,200.000.00(6,200.00)0.00%17,100.00(17,100.00)Moved revenue from building permits100‐00000‐32230 PLUMBING CONNECTION PERMITS27,340.0019,882.750.00(19,882.75)0.00%35,500.00(35,500.00)Moved revenue from building permits100‐00000‐32240 ANIMAL LICENSES0.000.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐00000‐32260 SIGN PERMITS750.00405.000.00(405.00)0.00%500.00(500.00)100‐00000‐32270 MECHANICAL PERMITS39,675.0027,675.000.00(27,675.00)0.00%51,400.00(51,400.00)Moved revenue from building permits100‐00000‐32290 WETLAND PERMIT FEES800.000.001,000.001,000.00100.00%1,000.000.00100‐00000‐33400 STATE GRANTS AND AIDS40,499.1944,605.5840,000.00(4,605.58)‐11.51%40,000.000.00100‐00000‐33402 HOMESTEAD CREDIT0.000.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐00000‐33416 POLICE TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT10,148.170.0012,500.0012,500.00100.00%12,500.000.00100‐00000‐33418MUN STATE AID STREETS ‐ MAINT157,694.40 400,439.20 150,000.00(250,439.20)‐166.96% 400,439.20(250,439.20)100‐00000‐33423 POLICE STATE AID62,602.700.0080,000.0080,000.00100.00%80,000.000.00100‐00000‐33426 AGRICULTURAL MARKET VALUE CREDIT28,649.290.0020,000.0020,000.00100.00%20,000.000.00100‐00000‐33429 STATE AID ‐ PERA0.000.001,845.001,845.00100.00%1,845.000.00100‐00000‐33615 COUNTY RECYCLING GRANT13,845.640.0013,900.0013,900.00100.00%13,900.000.00100‐00000‐33620 OTHER COUNTY GRANTS AND AIDS42,203.36320.0010,000.009,680.00100.00%10,000.000.00100‐00000‐33640 TOWARD ZERO DEATH GRANT13,286.2311,385.8810,000.00(1,385.88)‐13.86%11,385.88(1,385.88)100‐00000‐34100 CHARGES FOR SERVICES10,282.15320.00300.00(20.00)‐6.67%400.00(100.00)100‐00000‐34101FACILITY RENTAL(357.00)0.002,000.002,000.00100.00%0.002,000.00100‐00000‐34103 ZONING & SUBDIVISION FEES64,580.0026,300.0055,000.0028,700.0052.18%55,000.000.00100‐00000‐34104 BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK FEE246,161.63 265,941.440.00(265,941.44)0.00% 319,200.00(319,200.00)Moved revenue from building permits100‐00000‐34105 COPIES/MAPS2,332.0024.252,000.001,975.7598.79%2,000.000.00100‐00000‐34107 ASSESSMENT SEARCHES0.000.0030.0030.00100.00%30.000.00100‐00000‐34108 TIF ADMINISTRATION0.000.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐00000‐34109 OTHER BUILDING RELATED FEES44,065.2849,143.990.00(49,143.99)0.00%57,100.00(57,100.00)Moved revenue from building permits100‐00000‐34110 CITY PLANNER REVIEW FEE19,577.505,655.0050,000.0044,345.0088.69%30,000.0020,000.00100‐00000‐34200 PUBLIC SAFETY PERMITS4,280.001,020.004,000.002,980.0074.50%4,000.000.00100‐00000‐34201 SPECIAL POLICE SERVICES9,015.001,210.005,000.003,790.0075.80%23,000.00(18,000.00)Event pay ‐ pending reimbursement from other entities100‐00000‐34203 POLICE REPORTS836.00297.00300.003.001.00%300.000.00100‐00000‐34300 PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS AND FEES17,135.007,500.0016,500.009,000.0054.55%16,500.000.00100‐00000‐34301 DUST CONTROL2,901.690.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐00000‐34303 ICE & SNOW REMOVAL0.000.006,000.006,000.00100.00%6,000.000.00100‐00000‐34310 PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW FEE0.000.0088,200.0088,200.00100.00%44,100.0044,100.00100‐00000‐34400 RECYCLING2,390.940.005,000.005,000.00100.00%5,000.000.00100‐00000‐34403 REFUSE COLLECTION CHARGES5,661.915,294.004,500.00(794.00)‐17.64%5,294.00(794.00)100‐00000‐34700 PARK RENTAL2,616.005,095.200.00(5,095.20)0.00%5,095.20(5,095.20)100‐00000‐34790 RECREATION PROGRAMMING51,940.0941,365.0046,735.005,370.0011.49%46,735.000.00100‐00000‐35100 FINES21,978.8011,197.7225,000.0013,802.2893.52%25,000.000.00100‐00000‐36100 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS60.000.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐00000‐36200 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES34,074.762,382.004,000.001,618.0040.45%4,000.000.00100‐00000‐36210 INTEREST EARNINGS40,300.001.4211,500.0011,498.5899.99%11,500.000.00100‐00000‐36220 RENTS AND ROYALTIES0.000.007,000.007,000.00100.00%7,000.000.00100‐00000‐36230 DONATIONS1,250.001,020.001,000.00(20.00)‐2.00%1,020.00(20.00)100‐00000‐36232 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION0.000.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐00000‐36400 REFUNDS/REIMBURSEMENTS232,505.201,646.525,000.003,353.4867.07%5,000.000.00100‐00000‐38050 CABLE FRANCHISE FEE62,153.070.0059,000.0059,000.00100.00%59,000.000.00100‐00000‐39101SALE OF ASSETS63,858.061,265.000.00(1,265.00)0.00%1,265.00(1,265.00)100‐00000‐39203 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUND449,092.000.00 535,500.00 535,500.00100.00% 535,500.000.00TOTAL REVENUES7,636,045.03 4,121,913.97 8,952,680.00 4,830,766.0353.96% 9,163,154.28(210,474.28)CITY OF CORCORAN2023 PERFORMANCE REPORT ‐ GENERAL FUNDPERIOD ENDING 06/30/2023UNAUDITEDPage 1 of 8Attachment: 11d1. END BALANCE YTD BALANCE 2023 AVAILABLE % BUDGET YEAR END VARIANCEGL NUMBER DESCRIPTION 12/31/2022 06/30/2023 AMENDED BUDGET BALANCE REMAINING PROJECTION BUDGET VS. YEPCOMMENTSCITY OF CORCORAN2023 PERFORMANCE REPORT ‐ GENERAL FUNDPERIOD ENDING 06/30/2023UNAUDITEDExpendituresDept 41110 ‐ CITY COUNCIL100‐41110‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 19,260.00 9,630.00 19,260.00 9,630.00 50.00% 19,260.00 0.00100‐41110‐50122 FICA 1,194.12 597.06 1,200.00 602.94 50.25% 1,200.00 0.00100‐41110‐50126 MEDICARE 279.27 139.66 280.00 140.34 50.12% 280.00 0.00100‐41110‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 2,600.00 1,900.00 5,000.00 3,100.00 62.00% 5,000.00 0.00100‐41110‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 829.31 437.44 2,000.001,562.56 78.13% 2,000.00 0.00100‐41110‐50320 COMMUNICATIONS (GENERAL) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐41110‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 102.00 101.00 150.00 49.00 32.67% 101.00 49.00Total Dept 41110 ‐ CITY COUNCIL 24,264.70 12,805.16 27,890.0015,084.8454.09%27,841.0049.00Dept 41130 ‐ COMMUNICATION100‐41130‐50325 OTHER COMMUNICATION119.991,869.993,000.001,130.0137.67%1,869.991,130.01100‐41130‐50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO8,314.345,150.7810,000.004,849.2248.49%10,000.000.00Total Dept 41130 ‐ COMMUNICATION8,434.337,020.7713,000.005,979.2345.99%11,869.991,130.01Dept 41320 ‐ CITY ADMINISTRATOR100‐41320‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR131,412.6273,120.00 152,000.0078,880.0051.89% 152,000.000.00100‐41320‐50121 PERA9,855.935,484.0011,400.005,916.0051.89%11,400.000.00100‐41320‐50122 FICA7,087.883,981.949,500.005,518.0658.08%9,500.000.00100‐41320‐50126 MEDICARE1,657.66931.262,300.001,368.7459.51%2,300.000.00100‐41320‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE14,094.9410,279.4121,300.0011,020.5951.74%21,300.000.00100‐41320‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES1,910.5210.675,000.004,989.3399.79%5,000.000.00100‐41320‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES528.350.001,200.001,200.00100.00%0.001,200.00Expense was moved, inactive account100‐41320‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES21,000.000.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐41320‐50321 TELEPHONE550.000.00600.00600.00100.00%500.00100.00100‐41320‐50331TRAVEL EXPENSE184.9991.63600.00508.3784.73%250.00350.00100‐41320‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE1,085.001,566.001,000.00(566.00)‐56.60%1,566.00(566.00)100‐41320‐50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS1,370.981,421.101,400.00(21.10)‐1.51%1,421.10(21.10)Total Dept 41320 ‐ CITY ADMINISTRATOR190,738.8796,886.01 206,300.00 109,413.9953.04% 205,237.101,062.90Dept 41400 ‐ ADMINISTRATION100‐41400‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR117,616.03 119,903.14 249,800.00 129,896.8652.00% 249,800.000.00100‐41400‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME9,093.456,252.472,500.00(3,752.47)‐150.10%9,600.00(7,100.00)based on average from previous years100‐41400‐50111 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR0.005,281.5730,400.0025,118.4382.63%30,400.000.00100‐41400‐50112 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME0.000.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐41400‐50121 PERA9,457.669,850.3421,200.0011,349.6653.54%21,200.000.00100‐41400‐50122 FICA8,324.608,514.6717,600.009,085.3351.62%17,600.000.00100‐41400‐50126 MEDICARE1,946.931,991.334,100.002,108.6751.43%4,100.000.00100‐41400‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE35,987.1922,840.8656,300.0033,459.1459.43%56,300.000.00100‐41400‐50140 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION0.000.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐41400‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES963.72474.345,000.004,525.6690.51%2,000.003,000.00100‐41400‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES6,238.44222.580.00(222.58)0.00%222.58(222.58)100‐41400‐50321 TELEPHONE50.000.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐41400‐50331 TRAVEL EXPENSE65.69641.691,000.00358.3135.83%1,000.000.00100‐41400‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE1,636.211,851.003,000.001,149.0038.30%1,851.001,149.00Part of budgeted is for Finance division100‐41400‐50433DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS170.00125.001,500.001,375.0091.67%250.001,250.00Total Dept 41400 ‐ ADMINISTRATION191,549.92 177,948.99 392,400.00 214,451.0154.65% 394,323.58(1,923.58)Dept 41410 ‐ ELECTIONS100‐41410‐50114 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL EMPLOYEES11,399.460.00500.00500.00100.00%500.000.00100‐41410‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES5,090.4310.893,000.002,989.1199.64%3,000.000.00100‐41410‐50331 TRAVEL EXPENSE0.000.00300.00300.00100.00%300.000.00100‐41410‐50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE0.000.00100.00100.00100.00%100.000.00Total Dept 41410 ‐ ELECTIONS16,489.8910.893,900.003,889.1199.72%3,900.000.00Page 2 of 8 END BALANCE YTD BALANCE 2023 AVAILABLE % BUDGET YEAR END VARIANCEGL NUMBER DESCRIPTION 12/31/2022 06/30/2023 AMENDED BUDGET BALANCE REMAINING PROJECTION BUDGET VS. YEPCOMMENTSCITY OF CORCORAN2023 PERFORMANCE REPORT ‐ GENERAL FUNDPERIOD ENDING 06/30/2023UNAUDITEDDept 41500 ‐ FINANCE100‐41500‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 155,141.97 105,415.12 224,100.00 118,684.88 52.96% 224,100.00 0.00100‐41500‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 1,601.98 29.18 1,000.00 970.82 97.08% 1,000.00 0.00100‐41500‐50121 PERA 11,808.76 7,908.32 16,900.00 8,991.68 53.21% 16,900.00 0.00100‐41500‐50122 FICA 9,836.81 6,619.15 14,000.00 7,380.85 52.72% 14,000.00 0.00100‐41500‐50126 MEDICARE 2,300.55 1,548.03 3,300.00 1,751.97 53.09% 3,300.00 0.00100‐41500‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 25,393.11 20,653.36 63,300.00 42,646.64 67.37% 63,300.00 0.00100‐41500‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 1,719.53 610.67 3,500.00 2,889.33 82.55% 3,500.00 0.00100‐41500‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44,544.26 2,100.00 47,250.00 45,150.00 95.56% 47,250.00 0.00100‐41500‐50331 TRAVEL EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 100.00% 500.00 0.00100‐41500‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 1,373.00 1,983.00 0.00(1,983.00)0.00% 1,983.00(1,983.00)Was budgeted under Administration100‐41500‐50433DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS210.00380.001,000.00620.0062.00%500.00500.00Total Dept 41500 ‐ FINANCE253,929.97 147,246.83 374,850.00 227,603.1760.72% 376,333.00(1,483.00)Dept 41550 ‐ ASSESSING100‐41550‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES13.400.00300.00300.00100.00%300.000.00100‐41550‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES118,000.000.00 120,000.00 120,000.00100.00% 150,000.00(30,000.00)Actuals came in higher than anticipatedTotal Dept 41550 ‐ ASSESSING118,013.400.00 120,300.00 120,300.00100.00% 150,300.00(30,000.00)Dept 41600 ‐ LEGAL100‐41600‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES51,930.7128,405.5045,000.0016,594.5036.88%50,000.00(5,000.00)Total Dept 41600 ‐ LEGAL51,930.7128,405.5045,000.0016,594.5036.88%50,000.00(5,000.00)Dept 41900 ‐ CENTRAL SERVICES100‐41900‐50200 OFFICE SUPPLIES4,770.721,883.405,000.003,116.6062.33%5,000.000.00100‐41900‐50210OPERATING SUPPLIES 28,237.51 13,124.50 35,500.00 22,375.50 63.03% 30,000.00 5,500.00100‐41900‐50212 MOTOR FUELS265.11402.42500.0097.5819.52%700.00(200.00)Increase in staff and fuel cost100‐41900‐50221 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ‐ EQUIP.613.868.330.00(8.33)0.00%8.33(8.33)100‐41900‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES43,796.197,577.9030,000.0022,422.1074.74%40,000.00(10,000.00)100‐41900‐50321 TELEPHONE5,622.093,823.444,000.00176.564.41%4,000.000.00100‐41900‐50322 POSTAGE3,462.64128.854,000.003,871.1596.78%4,000.000.00100‐41900‐50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO245.37771.721,000.00228.2822.83%1,000.000.00100‐41900‐50360 INSURANCE96,778.00 128,705.00 108,000.00(20,705.00)‐19.17% 128,705.00(20,705.00)Actuals came in higher than anticipated100‐41900‐50380 UTILITY SERVICES9,472.423,586.7515,000.0011,413.2576.09%15,000.000.00100‐41900‐50381ELECTRIC UTILITIES19,420.3814,627.8119,000.004,372.1923.01%19,000.000.00100‐41900‐50382 WATER & SEWER329.390.000.000.00100.00%0.000.00100‐41900‐50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ CONTRACT2,789.891,510.1414,000.0012,489.8689.21%14,000.000.00100‐41900‐50401 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ BUILDING17,713.5810,255.5818,000.007,744.4243.02%18,000.000.00100‐41900‐50403 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ VEHICLE4,543.5440.001,500.001,460.0097.33%1,500.000.00100‐41900‐50404 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ MACHINERY/EQUIP8,136.801,292.292,000.00707.7135.39%2,000.000.00100‐41900‐50413 OFFICE EQUIPMENT RENTAL425.97283.98600.00316.0252.67%600.000.00100‐41900‐50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE18,806.573,000.0020,000.0017,000.0085.00%20,000.000.00100‐41900‐50431 BANKING CHARGES20.000.00400.00400.00100.00%400.000.00100‐41900‐50432 CREDIT CARD FEES4,893.360.008,000.008,000.00100.00%8,000.000.00100‐41900‐50433DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS25,373.2826,433.8125,300.00(1,133.81)‐4.48%25,300.000.00100‐41900‐50700 TRANSFERS794,568.870.00 360,000.00 360,000.00100.00% 360,000.000.002022 amount included prior year corrections/transfersTotal Dept 41900 ‐ CENTRAL SERVICES1,090,285.54 217,455.92 671,800.00 454,344.0867.63% 697,213.33(25,413.33)Dept 41910 ‐ PLANNING & ZONING100‐41910‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR73,205.5247,616.15 111,100.0063,483.8557.14% 111,100.000.00100‐41910‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME0.0086.551,000.00913.4591.35%1,000.000.00100‐41910‐50111 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR21,757.354,356.894,300.00(56.89)‐1.32%4,356.89(56.89)100‐41910‐50121 PERA7,108.073,897.178,800.004,902.8355.71%8,800.000.00100‐41910‐50122 FICA5,158.612,858.927,300.004,441.0860.84%7,300.000.00100‐41910‐50126MEDICARE1,207.22668.581,700.001,031.4260.67%1,700.000.00100‐41910‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE14,507.7914,941.0725,000.0010,058.9340.24%25,000.000.00100‐41910‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES757.51531.001,500.00969.0064.60%1,500.000.00100‐41910‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES84.960.00500.00500.00100.00%500.000.00100‐41910‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES99,212.2236,116.7570,000.0033,883.2548.40%70,000.000.00Page 3 of 8 END BALANCE YTD BALANCE 2023 AVAILABLE % BUDGET YEAR END VARIANCEGL NUMBER DESCRIPTION 12/31/2022 06/30/2023 AMENDED BUDGET BALANCE REMAINING PROJECTION BUDGET VS. YEPCOMMENTSCITY OF CORCORAN2023 PERFORMANCE REPORT ‐ GENERAL FUNDPERIOD ENDING 06/30/2023UNAUDITED100‐41910‐50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO 1,539.08 734.45 750.00 15.55 2.07% 750.00 0.00100‐41910‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 996.00 247.00 500.00 253.00 50.60% 247.00 253.00Billed amount came in lower than budgeted.100‐41910‐50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 142.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐41910‐50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 164.00 99.00250.00 151.00 60.40% 250.00 0.00Total Dept 41910 ‐ PLANNING & ZONING 225,840.33 112,153.53 232,700.00 120,546.47 51.80% 232,503.89 196.11Dept 41920 ‐ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY100‐41920‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 55,825.39 28,598.87 40,000.00 11,401.13 28.50% 40,000.00 0.00100‐41920‐50221 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ‐ EQUIP. 43,380.16 9,666.53 45,000.00 35,333.47 78.52% 45,000.00 0.00100‐41920‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140,283.50 53,813.36 140,000.00 86,186.64 61.56% 140,000.00 0.00Total Dept 41920 ‐ INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 239,489.05 92,078.76 225,000.00 132,921.24 59.08% 225,000.00 0.00Dept 42100 ‐ POLICE100‐42100‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 974,611.43 574,365.41 1,189,700.00 615,334.59 51.72% 1,189,700.00 0.00100‐42100‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 43,512.26 18,319.53 39,400.00 21,080.47 53.50% 39,400.00 0.00100‐42100‐50103 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ EVENT PAY 27,668.07 18,790.88 18,000.00(790.88)‐4.39% 23,000.00(5,000.00)More officers working event, offsets with revenue100‐42100‐50111 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 69,320.80 32,503.13 134,100.00 101,596.87 75.76% 134,100.00 0.00100‐42100‐50112 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐42100‐50113 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ EVENT PAY 10,114.13 1,836.25 15,000.0013,163.75 87.76% 15,000.00 0.00100‐42100‐50121 PERA 189,867.10 110,546.62 228,700.00 118,153.38 51.66% 228,700.00 0.00100‐42100‐50122 FICA 2,649.89 1,479.11 5,900.00 4,420.89 74.93% 5,900.00 0.00100‐42100‐50126 MEDICARE 16,078.20 9,214.59 19,800.00 10,585.41 53.46% 19,800.00 0.00100‐42100‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 208,857.63 95,619.38 216,700.00 121,080.62 55.87% 216,700.00 0.00100‐42100‐50140 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 100.00 0.00(100.00)0.00% 100.00(100.00)100‐42100‐50200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,104.69 527.92 3,600.00 3,072.08 85.34% 3,600.00 0.00100‐42100‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 33,907.14 30,072.12 38,000.00 7,927.88 20.86% 38,000.00 0.00100‐42100‐50209 POLICE RESERVES 3,427.88 1,309.50 3,500.00 2,190.50 62.59% 3,500.00 0.00100‐42100‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 29,647.65 26,376.69 21,000.00(5,376.69)‐25.60% 23,000.00(2,000.00)100‐42100‐50212 MOTOR FUELS 42,817.18 17,960.39 27,000.00 9,039.61 33.48% 27,000.00 0.00100‐42100‐50220 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 13,988.71 8,658.90 8,000.00(658.90)‐8.24% 11,000.00(3,000.00)100‐42100‐50223 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 7,447.38 1,340.68 7,500.00 6,159.32 82.12% 7,500.00 0.00100‐42100‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24,844.32 22,883.90 30,000.00 7,116.10 23.72% 30,000.00 0.00100‐42100‐50304 LEGAL FEES 43,455.39 21,747.99 25,500.003,752.01 14.71% 25,500.00 0.00100‐42100‐50305 PRISONER 2,955.51 1,574.94 4,000.00 2,425.06 60.63% 4,000.00 0.00100‐42100‐50321 TELEPHONE 18,967.96 5,577.46 12,500.00 6,922.54 55.38% 12,500.00 0.00100‐42100‐50322 POSTAGE 21.60 28.23 100.00 71.77 71.77% 100.00 0.00100‐42100‐50323 RADIO UNITS 18,579.35 8,766.21 23,500.00 14,733.79 62.70% 23,500.00 0.00100‐42100‐50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO 294.85 0.00 800.00 800.00 100.00% 800.00 0.00100‐42100‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 138,953.00 135,658.00 150,000.00 14,342.00 9.56% 135,658.00 14,342.00Billed amount came in lower than budgeted.100‐42100‐50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ CONTRACT 229.87 1,595.09 500.00(1,095.09)‐219.02% 2,500.00(2,000.00)100‐42100‐50403 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ VEHICLE 4,711.99 7,219.997,700.00 480.01 6.23% 9,000.00(1,300.00)100‐42100‐50417 UNIFORMS 27,768.72 12,589.16 26,000.00 13,410.84 51.58% 26,000.00 0.00100‐42100‐50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 40,983.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐42100‐50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 2,932.10 2,506.503,500.00 993.50 28.39% 3,500.00 0.00100‐42100‐50438 POLICE K9 615.98 1,409.17 0.00(1,409.17)0.00% 1,500.00(1,500.00)Total Dept 42100 ‐ POLICE 2,001,334.73 1,170,577.74 2,260,000.00 1,089,422.26 48.20% 2,260,558.00(558.00)Dept 42102 ‐ POLICE ADMINISTRATION100‐42102‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 122,533.19 67,240.03 140,300.00 73,059.97 52.07% 140,300.00 0.00100‐42102‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 398.49 0.00 500.00 500.00 100.00% 500.00 0.00100‐42102‐50111 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐42102‐50121 PERA 8,834.94 5,043.00 10,600.00 5,557.00 52.42% 10,600.00 0.00100‐42102‐50122 FICA 7,938.69 4,325.00 8,800.00 4,475.00 50.85% 8,800.00 0.00100‐42102‐50126 MEDICARE 1,856.43 1,011.49 2,100.00 1,088.51 51.83% 2,100.00 0.00100‐42102‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 26,440.88 12,976.13 25,900.00 12,923.87 49.90% 25,900.00 0.00100‐42102‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 1,095.00 1,581.00 0.00(1,581.00)0.00% 1,581.00(1,581.00)Total Dept 42102 ‐ POLICE ADMINISTRATION 169,097.62 92,176.65 188,200.00 96,023.35 51.02% 189,781.00(1,581.00)Page 4 of 8 END BALANCE YTD BALANCE 2023 AVAILABLE % BUDGET YEAR END VARIANCEGL NUMBER DESCRIPTION 12/31/2022 06/30/2023 AMENDED BUDGET BALANCE REMAINING PROJECTION BUDGET VS. YEPCOMMENTSCITY OF CORCORAN2023 PERFORMANCE REPORT ‐ GENERAL FUNDPERIOD ENDING 06/30/2023UNAUDITEDDept 42151 ‐ EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT100‐42151‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 166.39 0.00 3,000.003,000.00 100.00% 3,000.00 0.00100‐42151‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 5,181.83 220.83 5,450.00 5,229.17 95.95% 5,450.00 0.00100‐42151‐50381 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 1,168.18 622.04 1,000.00 377.96 37.80% 1,000.00 0.00100‐42151‐50404 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ MACHINERY/EQUIP 830.25 871.741,700.00 828.26 48.72% 1,700.00 0.00100‐42151‐50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 100.00 0.00500.00 500.00 100.00% 500.00 0.00Total Dept 42151 ‐ EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 7,446.65 1,714.61 11,650.00 9,935.39 85.28% 11,650.00 0.00Dept 42200 ‐ FIRE100‐42200‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 0.00 0.00 18,700.00 18,700.00 100.00% 18,700.00 0.00100‐42200‐50121 PERA 0.00 0.00 3,400.003,400.00 100.00% 3,400.00 0.00100‐42200‐50122 FICA 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐42200‐50126 MEDICARE 0.00 0.00 300.00 300.00 100.00% 300.00 0.00100‐42200‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100.00% 3,500.00 0.00100‐42200‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100.00% 1,000.00 0.00100‐42200‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100.00% 5,000.00 0.00100‐42200‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 445,933.67 285,020.91 569,630.00 284,609.09 49.96% 569,630.00 0.00100‐42200‐50321 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 150.00 150.00 100.00% 150.00 0.00100‐42200‐50323 RADIO UNITS 0.00 0.00 300.00 300.00 100.00% 300.00 0.00100‐42200‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100.00% 3,500.00 0.00100‐42200‐50403 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ VEHICLE 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 100.00% 1,200.00 0.00100‐42200‐50417 UNIFORMS 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 100.00% 1,500.00 0.00100‐42200‐50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 100.00% 500.00 0.00100‐42200‐50580 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100.00% 10,000.00 0.00Total Dept 42200 ‐ FIRE 445,933.67 285,020.91 618,680.00333,659.09 53.93% 618,680.00 0.00Dept 42400 ‐ BUILDING INSPECTION100‐42400‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 120,831.41 89,427.12 197,100.00 107,672.88 54.63% 197,100.00 0.00100‐42400‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 886.22 383.04 1,000.00 616.96 61.70% 1,000.00 0.00100‐42400‐50121 PERA 8,493.16 6,735.81 14,900.00 8,164.19 54.79% 14,900.00 0.00100‐42400‐50122 FICA 8,053.89 5,951.59 12,300.00 6,348.41 51.61% 12,300.00 0.00100‐42400‐50126 MEDICARE 1,893.59 1,352.97 2,900.00 1,547.03 53.35% 2,900.00 0.00100‐42400‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 13,598.48 8,882.77 32,700.00 23,817.23 72.84% 32,700.00 0.00100‐42400‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 1,167.51 880.82 1,000.00 119.18 11.92% 1,000.00 0.00100‐42400‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 223,322.32 69,216.81 400,000.00 330,783.19 82.70% 400,000.00 0.00100‐42400‐50303 ENGINEERING FEES 32,425.50 14,030.60 30,000.0015,969.40 53.23% 30,000.00 0.00100‐42400‐50331 TRAVEL EXPENSE 129.50 60.28 0.00(60.28)0.00% 60.28(60.28)100‐42400‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 1,493.00 806.00 0.00(806.00)0.00% 806.00(806.00)100‐42400‐50432 CREDIT CARD FEES 430.62 217.35 0.00(217.35)0.00% 217.35(217.35)100‐42400‐50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 65.00 108.55 0.00(108.55)0.00% 108.55(108.55)Total Dept 42400 ‐ BUILDING INSPECTION 412,790.20 198,053.71691,900.00 493,846.29 71.38% 693,092.18(1,192.18)Dept 42401 ‐ CODE ENFORCEMENT100‐42401‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 0.00 7,732.97 28,000.00 20,267.03 72.38% 28,000.00 0.00100‐42401‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 0.00 86.55 1,000.00 913.45 91.35% 1,000.00 0.00100‐42401‐50121 PERA 0.00 593.77 2,200.001,606.23 73.01% 2,200.00 0.00100‐42401‐50122 FICA 0.00 523.09 1,800.001,276.91 70.94% 1,800.00 0.00100‐42401‐50126 MEDICARE 0.00 122.36 500.00 377.64 75.53% 500.00 0.00100‐42401‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 350.00 1,182.51 3,800.00 2,617.49 68.88% 3,800.00 0.00100‐42401‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 100.00% 1,500.00 0.00100‐42401‐50212 MOTOR FUELS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐42401‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,450.75 10,634.50 15,000.00 4,365.50 29.10% 17,000.00(2,000.00)Year end projection includes the creation of a $6,000 rental map from Stantec that was approved by Council and not previously budgeted. Expected that conversion fees for single‐family rental licenses will help go towards funding this.100‐42401‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐42401‐50417 UNIFORMS 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00% 100.00 0.00100‐42401‐50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00Total Dept 42401 ‐ CODE ENFORCEMENT 23,800.75 20,875.7553,900.00 33,024.25 61.27% 55,900.00(2,000.00)Page 5 of 8 END BALANCE YTD BALANCE 2023 AVAILABLE % BUDGET YEAR END VARIANCEGL NUMBER DESCRIPTION 12/31/2022 06/30/2023 AMENDED BUDGET BALANCE REMAINING PROJECTION BUDGET VS. YEPCOMMENTSCITY OF CORCORAN2023 PERFORMANCE REPORT ‐ GENERAL FUNDPERIOD ENDING 06/30/2023UNAUDITEDDept 43100 ‐ HIGHWAYS, STREETS & ROADWAYS100‐43100‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 609,889.83 268,883.00 701,400.00 432,517.00 61.66% 701,400.00 0.00100‐43100‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 70,928.59 47,631.17 52,500.00 4,868.83 9.27% 52,500.00 0.00100‐43100‐50111 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 30,211.98 5,684.28 7,100.00 1,415.72 19.94% 7,100.00 0.00100‐43100‐50112 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 23.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐43100‐50121 PERA 48,747.33 23,769.63 56,600.00 32,830.37 58.00% 56,600.00 0.00100‐43100‐50122 FICA 44,374.04 19,051.04 47,200.00 28,148.96 59.64% 47,200.00 0.00100‐43100‐50126 MEDICARE 10,140.39 4,455.55 11,100.00 6,644.45 59.86% 11,100.00 0.00100‐43100‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 126,506.84 57,051.28 150,000.00 92,948.72 61.97% 150,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50140 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 7,726.35 0.00(7,726.35)0.00% 7,726.35(7,726.35)100‐43100‐50200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 669.22 0.00 1,000.001,000.00 100.00% 1,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 1,156.38 565.55 7,500.00 6,934.45 92.46% 7,500.00 0.00100‐43100‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 18,752.28 5,198.20 43,500.00 38,301.80 88.05% 43,500.00 0.00100‐43100‐50212 MOTOR FUELS 60,164.31 27,689.81 60,000.00 32,310.19 53.85% 60,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50220 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 41,960.17 17,577.91 70,000.00 52,422.09 74.89% 70,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50223 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 11,518.73 2,362.65 15,000.00 12,637.35 84.25% 15,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50225 LANDSCAPE/DITCH MATERIALS 68,199.05 10,943.47 50,000.00 39,056.53 78.11% 50,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50226 SIGN REPAIR MATERIALS 5,170.56 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100.00% 10,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 731.77 495.00 0.00(495.00)0.00% 495.00(495.00)100‐43100‐50321 TELEPHONE 6,401.00 3,432.86 11,500.00 8,067.14 70.15% 11,500.00 0.00100‐43100‐50323 RADIO UNITS 3,397.68 1,619.40 4,000.00 2,380.60 59.52% 4,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50350 GENERAL NOTICES AND PUB INFO 431.40 0.00 500.00 500.00 100.00% 500.00 0.00100‐43100‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 41,503.79 34,469.00 35,000.00 531.00 1.52% 35,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50380 UTILITY SERVICES 16,495.61 9,333.68 22,000.00 12,666.32 57.57% 22,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50381 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 18,997.74 8,388.06 10,000.00 1,611.94 16.12% 20,000.00(10,000.00)Higher than anticipated electric bills100‐43100‐50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ CONTRACT 6,854.03 4,618.47 7,500.00 2,881.53 38.42% 7,500.00 0.00100‐43100‐50401 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ BUILDING 4,319.18 1,609.24 10,000.00 8,390.76 83.91% 10,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50403 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ VEHICLE 1,778.72 270.00 10,000.00 9,730.00 97.30% 10,000.00 0.00100‐43100‐50417 UNIFORMS 10,844.66 4,336.53 12,500.00 8,163.47 65.31% 12,500.00 0.00100‐43100‐50430 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 108,072.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐43100‐50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 372.50 0.00500.00 500.00 100.00% 500.00 0.00100‐43100‐50811 INSURANCE REFUNDS 35,519.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00Total Dept 43100 ‐ HIGHWAYS, STREETS & ROADWAYS 1,404,132.95 567,162.13 1,406,400.00 839,237.87 59.67% 1,424,621.35(18,221.35)Dept 43121 ‐ PAVED STREETS100‐43121‐50224 STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 6,263.20 8,618.70 15,000.00 6,381.30 42.54% 15,000.00 0.00100‐43121‐50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ CONTRACT 243,266.23 3,250.00 290,000.00 286,750.00 98.88% 290,000.00 0.00Total Dept 43121 ‐ PAVED STREETS 249,529.43 11,868.70 305,000.00 293,131.30 96.11% 305,000.00 0.00Dept 43122 ‐ UNPAVED STREETS100‐43122‐50224 STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 92,394.92 113,687.40 112,500.00(1,187.40)‐1.06% 113,687.40(1,187.40)100‐43122‐50400 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ‐ CONTRACT 222,672.37 81,839.37 232,500.00 150,660.63 64.80% 232,500.00 0.00Total Dept 43122 ‐ UNPAVED STREETS 315,067.29 195,526.77 345,000.00 149,473.23 43.33% 346,187.40(1,187.40)Dept 43125 ‐ ICE & SNOW REMOVAL100‐43125‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 45,351.38 18,271.01 55,000.00 36,728.99 66.78% 55,000.00 0.00100‐43125‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 650.00 0.00 2,100.002,100.00 100.00% 2,100.00 0.00Total Dept 43125 ‐ ICE & SNOW REMOVAL 46,001.38 18,271.01 57,100.00 38,828.99 68.00% 57,100.00 0.00Page 6 of 8 END BALANCE YTD BALANCE 2023 AVAILABLE % BUDGET YEAR END VARIANCEGL NUMBER DESCRIPTION 12/31/2022 06/30/2023 AMENDED BUDGET BALANCE REMAINING PROJECTION BUDGET VS. YEPCOMMENTSCITY OF CORCORAN2023 PERFORMANCE REPORT ‐ GENERAL FUNDPERIOD ENDING 06/30/2023UNAUDITEDDept 43170 ‐ ENGINEERING100‐43170‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 0.00 28,834.24 185,700.00 156,865.76 84.47% 185,700.00 0.00100‐43170‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐43170‐50111 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐43170‐50121 PERA 0.00 2,162.54 14,000.0011,837.46 84.55% 14,000.00 0.00100‐43170‐50122 FICA 0.00 1,754.39 11,600.009,845.61 84.88% 11,600.00 0.00100‐43170‐50126 MEDICARE 0.00 410.23 2,700.00 2,289.77 84.81% 2,700.00 0.00100‐43170‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 0.00 1,488.52 34,700.00 33,211.48 95.71% 34,700.00 0.00100‐43170‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 75,961.00 41,018.30 80,000.00 38,981.70 48.73% 80,000.00 0.00100‐43170‐50309 WATERSHED LGU 11,965.25 4,612.30 10,000.005,387.70 53.88% 10,000.00 0.00Total Dept 43170 ‐ ENGINEERING 87,926.25 80,280.52 338,700.00 258,419.48 76.30% 338,700.00 0.00Dept 43201 ‐ RECYCLING100‐43201‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3,987.32 3,342.05 3,500.00 157.95 4.51% 3,500.00 0.00100‐43201‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,522.80 4,360.45 10,000.00 5,639.55 56.40% 10,000.00 0.00Total Dept 43201 ‐ RECYCLING 12,510.12 7,702.50 13,500.00 5,797.50 42.94% 13,500.00 0.00Dept 45100 ‐ RECREATION100‐45100‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 34,102.21 18,365.00 38,800.00 20,435.00 52.67% 38,800.00 0.00100‐45100‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 0.00 13.77 0.00(13.77)0.00% 13.77(13.77)100‐45100‐50111 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 0.00 0.00 27,000.00 27,000.00 100.00% 27,000.00 0.00100‐45100‐50121 PERA 2,557.66 1,378.41 3,000.00 1,621.59 54.05% 3,000.00 0.00100‐45100‐50122 FICA 2,251.87 1,201.56 4,200.00 2,998.44 71.39% 4,200.00 0.00100‐45100‐50126 MEDICARE 526.61 281.01 1,000.00 718.99 71.90% 1,000.00 0.00100‐45100‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 4,658.26 2,294.16 8,800.00 6,505.84 73.93% 8,800.00 0.00100‐45100‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 536.73 2,248.97 17,770.00 15,521.03 87.34% 17,770.00 0.00100‐45100‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 21,010.89 12,001.75 21,430.00 9,428.25 44.00% 21,430.00 0.00100‐45100‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,087.22 2,514.22 3,360.00 845.78 25.17% 3,360.00 0.00100‐45100‐50321 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐45100‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 3,940.00 4,082.00 0.00(4,082.00)0.00% 4,082.00(4,082.00)100‐45100‐50417 UNIFORMS 0.00 129.00 150.00 21.00 14.00% 150.00 0.00100‐45100‐50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 285.00 485.00500.00 15.00 3.00% 500.00 0.00Total Dept 45100 ‐ RECREATION 71,956.45 44,994.85126,010.00 81,015.15 64.29% 130,105.77(4,095.77)Dept 45200 ‐ PARKS100‐45200‐50101 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 47,440.15 25,287.76 38,800.00 13,512.24 34.83% 38,800.00 0.00100‐45200‐50102 FULL‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ OVERTIME 0.00 13.78 1,000.00 986.22 98.62% 1,000.00 0.00100‐45200‐50111 PART‐TIME EMPLOYEES ‐ REGULAR 0.00 9,192.66 19,700.00 10,507.34 53.34% 19,700.00 0.00100‐45200‐50121 PERA 2,432.93 1,378.42 3,000.00 1,621.58 54.05% 3,000.00 0.00100‐45200‐50122 FICA 3,160.27 2,200.80 3,700.00 1,499.20 40.52% 3,700.00 0.00100‐45200‐50126 MEDICARE 721.40 514.70 900.00 385.30 42.81% 900.00 0.00100‐45200‐50130 EMPLOYER PAID INSURANCE 9,856.14 4,791.42 8,800.00 4,008.58 45.55% 8,800.00 0.00100‐45200‐50140 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐45200‐50207 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00% 100.00 0.00100‐45200‐50210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 16,912.64 6,472.30 30,000.00 23,527.70 78.43% 30,000.00 0.00100‐45200‐50221 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ‐ EQUIP. 27,440.50 5,305.19 50,000.00 44,694.81 89.39% 50,000.00 0.00100‐45200‐50300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,673.50 750.06 1,000.00 249.94 24.99% 1,000.00 0.00100‐45200‐50321 TELEPHONE 1,229.47 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 100.00% 2,000.00 0.00100‐45200‐50365 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE 9,184.00 9,935.00 14,000.00 4,065.00 29.04% 14,000.00 0.00100‐45200‐50380 UTILITY SERVICES 8,544.67 1,390.32 6,500.00 5,109.68 78.61% 6,500.00 0.00100‐45200‐50381 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 1,835.95 1,178.59 1,500.00 321.41 21.43% 1,500.00 0.00100‐45200‐50382 WATER & SEWER 162.73 123.23 2,500.002,376.77 95.07% 2,500.00 0.00100‐45200‐50417 UNIFORMS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐45200‐50433 DUES AND MEMBERSHIPS 150.00 0.000.00 0.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00100‐45200‐50530 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 40,499.19 46,953.24 40,000.00(6,953.24)‐17.38% 46,953.24(6,953.24)Total Dept 45200 ‐ PARKS 173,243.54 115,487.47 223,500.00 108,012.53 48.33% 230,453.24(6,953.24)TOTAL EXPENDITURES 7,831,737.74 3,701,725.688,952,680.00 5,250,954.32 58.65% 9,049,850.83(97,170.83)Page 7 of 8 END BALANCE YTD BALANCE 2023 AVAILABLE % BUDGET YEAR END VARIANCEGL NUMBER DESCRIPTION 12/31/2022 06/30/2023 AMENDED BUDGET BALANCE REMAINING PROJECTION BUDGET VS. YEPCOMMENTSCITY OF CORCORAN2023 PERFORMANCE REPORT ‐ GENERAL FUNDPERIOD ENDING 06/30/2023UNAUDITEDFund 100 ‐ GENERAL FUND:TOTAL REVENUES 7,636,045.03 4,121,913.97 8,952,680.00 4,830,766.03 53.96% 9,163,154.28TOTAL EXPENDITURES 7,831,737.74 3,701,725.688,952,680.00 5,250,954.32 58.65% 9,049,850.83NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES(195,692.71)420,188.29 0.00(420,188.29)0.00% 113,303.45Page 8 of 8 City of Corcoran 2023 City Council Schedule Agenda Item: 13. Below is a tentative schedule for City Council meetings. The items and schedule are subject to change. August 10, 2023 Work Session • Logo Update August 10, 2023 • Draft 2024-25 CIP and Pre Orders • Public Hearing: Controlled Substance Ordinance (Jess to confirm) • Discussion Adult Use Cannabis Regulation o Controlled Substance Regulation THC • Public Hearing: Adopt Interim Moritorium Ordinance (Jess to confirm) • Discussion Adult Use Cannabis Regulation o Moritorium Discussion • Trail Haven Bridge Replacement – Pay Request 2* • Organics Recycling Requirements August 24, 2023 Work Session • Draft 2024 Budget August 24, 2023 • Planning Project Update • Paula Steelman – Years of Service Recognition (15 Years) • Red Barn Pet Retreat CPA, RZ, PP, CUP and SP (city file 23-008) • Park Signs Plan September 12, 2023 – Annual Charter Commission Meeting • 4 Year Mayoral Term (Staff) • Voter Information Information (Staff) • Terms and Appointments (Staff) • Stagger Commission Terms (Guenthner) • Ward Information (Tucker) • Joint Council Meeting (Staff) September 14, 2023 Work Session • Underlying Zoning Districts September 14, 2023 • Preliminary Budget and Levy • Fund Creation – Internal Revenue Account – Recruitment and Retention • Levy Insert Page 2 of 2 September 28, 2023 • Progess Report – 2023 Goals and Measurables • Planning Project Update October 12, 2023 • October 26, 2023 • Planning Project Update • Robbie Kottke - Years of Service Recognition (5 Years) November 9, 2023 • Discuss the Assessor Contract – Need to Give Notice of Renewal by March 1, 2024 – If RFP Start in December November 20, 2023 (Monday Meeting Due to Holiday) Dember 18, 2023 (Monday Meeting - Only Meeting in December ) Additional Future Meetings