Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2023-02-23 Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda February 23, 2023 - 7:00 pm Revised 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Agenda Approval 4. Commission Representatives* 5. Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6. Presentations/Recognitions a. Resolution 2023-16 Honoring Parks and Trails Commissioner Sharon Meister* b. Resolution 2023-17 Honoring Planning Commissioner Jim Shoulak* 7. Consent Agenda a. 2023-01-26 Draft Council Work Session Minutes* b. 2023-01-26 Draft Council Minutes* c. Financial Claims* d. Temporary Liquor License – Lions Park June 2-4, 2023* e. Schedule Work Session March 9, 2023 – Pedestrian Crossing Policy* f. Accepting Commission Resignations and Appointment Process* g. Resolution 2023-14 Accepting Donation – Sports Star Photography* 8. Planning Business – Public Comment Opportunity a. Concept Sketch Plan – Kariniemi* b. Concept Sketch Plan – Amira Village* c. Transition Buffer Ordinance Discussion* 9. Unfinished Business – Public Comment Opportunity a. Mandatory Sewer and Water Connections and Request for Extension* b. Horseshoe Bend Feasibility Study* c. 2023 Capital Improvement Plan Purchase – Trail Maintenance Equipment* 10. New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a. Financial Assistance – Tax Abatement and TIF* b. Chariable Gambling Fund – Table and Chair Purchase* c. Police Department Recruitment and Retention* d. Cropland Weed Control* e. Park and Trails Commission Annual Appointments* f. Charter Commission Annual Appointments* 11. Staff Reports a. Planning Project Update* b. Added: Water Infrastructure Bonding Bill Update c. Added: Hackamore Road Improvement Project Update 12. 2023 City Council Schedule* 13. Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.corcoranmn.gov. HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Council meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 814 8381 7127 Press *9 to speak during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81483817127 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 814 8381 7127 Participants can utilize the Raise Hand function to be recognized to speak during the Public Comment sections in the meeting. Participant video feeds will be muted. In-person comments will be received first, with the hybrid electronic means option following. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov Corcoran City Council Agenda February 23, 2023 - 7:00 pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Commission Representatives* 5.Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6.Presentations/Recognitions a.Resolution 2023-16 Honoring Parks and Trails Commissioner Sharon Meister* b.Resolution 2023-17 Honoring Planning Commissioner Jim Shoulak* 7.Consent Agenda a.2023-01-26 Draft Council Work Session Minutes* b.2023-01-26 Draft Council Minutes* c.Financial Claims* d.Temporary Liquor License – Lions Park June 2-4, 2023* e.Schedule Work Session March 9, 2023 – Pedestrian Crossing Policy* f.Accepting Commission Resignations and Appointment Process* g.Resolution 2023-14 Accepting Donation – Sports Star Photography* 8.Planning Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Concept Sketch Plan – Kariniemi* b.Concept Sketch Plan – Amira Village* c.Transition Buffer Ordinance Discussion* 9.Unfinished Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Mandatory Sewer and Water Connections and Request for Extension* b.Horseshoe Bend Feasability Study* c.2023 Capital Improvement Plan Purchase – Trail Maintenance Equipment* 10.New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Financial Assistance – Tax Abatement and TIF* b.Chariable Gambling Fund – Table and Chair Purchase* c.Police Department Recruitment and Retention* d.Cropland Weed Control* e.Park and Trails Commission Annual Appointments* f.Charter Commission Annual Appointments* 11.Staff Reports a.Planning Project Update* 12.2023 City Council Schedule* 13.Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.corcoranmn.gov. HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Council meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 814 8381 7127 Press *9 to speak during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81483817127 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 814 8381 7127 Participants can utilize the Raise Hand function to be recognized to speak during the Public Comment sections in the meeting. Participant video feeds will be muted. In-person comments will be received first, with the hybrid electronic means option following. For more information on options to provide www.corcoranmn.gov * STAFF REPORT Agenda Item : 4. Council Meeting: Prepared By: Topic: Action Required: Summary : • • Financial/Budget: Attachments: City of Corcoran February 23, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-16 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION HONORING OUTGOING COMMISSIONER SHARON MEISTER WHEREAS, Sharon Meister was appointed as a Parks and Trails Commissioner for an initial term from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016; and WHEREAS, Sharon Meister was successfully re-appointed to two additional terms from January 1, 2017 to February 28, 2023, which included one year as Vice-chair and three years as Chair of the Parks and Trails Commission; and WHEREAS, during her tenure on the Parks and Trails Commission, Sharon assisted in reviewing various development plans, took part in planning the future park system within the City as a whole, implemented a pollinator garden in the City Hall Memorial Garden, assisted in improvements to the City Hall Memorial Garden, and reviewed the parks budget and staffing plan; and WHEREAS, Sharon Meister has elected to end her service on the Parks and Trails Commission as her term expires on February 28, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran recognizes the time, energy, dedication, and leadership provided by Sharon Meister. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Corcoran, that the City Council hereby honors Sharon Meister for her distinguished service to the City of Corcoran and residents of the City. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of February, 2023. ________________________________ Tom McKee -- Mayor ATTEST: City Seal ____________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Agenda Item: 6a. City of Corcoran February 23, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-17 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION HONORING OUTGOING COMMISSIONER JIM SHOULAK WHEREAS, Jim Shoulak was appointed as a Planning Commissioner for a term from December 13, 2018 to February 28, 2020; and WHEREAS, Jim Shoulak was successfully re-appointed to one additional term from March 1, 2020 to February 28, 2023; and has provided valuable service on the Planning Commission for the City of Corcoran and has elected to end his service following the expiration of February 28, 2023. WHEREAS, during his tenure on the Planning Commission, Jim assisted in reviewing dozens of land use applications, assisted in ordinance updates, northeast district design guidelines, development rights program, open space & preservation, and park dedication; and WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran recognizes the time, energy, dedication, and leadership provided by Jim Shoulak. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Corcoran hereby honors Jim Shoulak for his distinguished service on the Planning Commission for the City of Corcoran. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of February, 2023. ________________________________ Tom McKee -- Mayor ATTEST: City Seal ____________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Agenda Item: 6b. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item : 7a. Council Meeting: Prepared By: Topic: Action Required: Summary : STAFF REPORT Agenda Item : 7b . Council Meeting: Prepared By: Topic: Action Required: Summary : Agenda Item 7c. Council Meeting Date:2/23/2023 Prepared By:Maggie Ung Amount Project name $0.00 -$ $558,048.51 558,048.51$ 164,227.88$ 722,276.39$ Date Paid to Amount Description 2/8/2023 RevTrak 409.43$ Credit Card Fee 2/8/2023 InvoiceCloud 1,125.85$ Credit Card Fee 2/9/2023 ADP 124,183.08$ Net Payroll and Taxes 2/13/2023 MN State - Empower 5,788.08$ Employee Deferred Comp/Healthcare Savings 2/13/2023 MN PERA 24,679.57$ Employee Pension 2/14/2023 Optum Bank 4,341.04$ Employee HSA 2/16/2023 MN Dept of Revenue 326.04$ Fuel Tax 2/16/2023 The Hartford 3,217.90$ Jan/Feb Employee Disability Premium 1/16/2023 TinyURL 119.88$ Website fee 1/27/2023 USPS 37.01$ Newsletter Postage Total 164,227.88$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL Auto Deductions / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursements ALL OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMS Check Register (See attached Check Detail Registers) Total Checks Total of Auto Deductions Total Total Fund #500 = (See attached Payments Detail) FINANCIAL CLAIMS CHECK RANGE FUND #500 ESCROW CLAIMS Paid to SEE THE REGISTER FOR #500 CLAIMS CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 1/9Page: 02/17/2023 09:19 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/10/2023 - 02/23/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 33399 3339912,003.00 02/09/2302092023TRAIL HAVEN BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - EGARY MILLER AND/OR M. DIANE 02/09/23408-48009-50510 12,003.00 Total For Check 33399 Check 33400 334009,639.50 02/09/2302/09/23TRAIL HAVEN BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - EJONATHAN BOTTEMA AND ANGELA 02/09/23408-48009-50510 9,639.50 Total For Check 33400 Check 33401 334013,185.80 02/09/2302/09/2023TRAIL HAVEN BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - EKAY A. MOORE02/09/23408-48009-50510 3,185.80 Total For Check 33401 Check 33402 33402370.00 02/09/2320232023 ANNUAL CONFERENCEST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY02/01/23100-41400-50207 370.00 Total For Check 33402 Check 33403 334032,000.00 02/13/23GR22-001ESCROW REFUND - 6800 ROLLING HILLS SARAH DEVORE10/20/22100-00000-22205 2,000.00 Total For Check 33403 Check 33404 334048,000.00 02/23/234668992022 AUDIT SERVICESABDO LLP01/31/23100-41500-50300 8,000.00 Total For Check 33404 Check 33405 33405104.99 02/23/2310909034AVALANCHE - SNOW RAKEACME TOOLS01/31/23100-45200-50210 104.99 Total For Check 33405 Check 33406 33406123.90 02/23/2316JW-RV3X-PNNHDESKTOP FILE ORGANIZER / CHAIR MAT AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES02/12/23100-41900-50200 3340635.57 02/23/2316L3-PDNT-JLTWCLEANING WIPES / INDOOR THERMOMETEAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES02/10/23100-41900-50200 3340699.98 02/23/231PND-JW67-FVVFDUAL MONITOR STAND - K. HUGHESAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES02/04/23100-41920-50210 3340642.30 02/23/231HDT-PR3F-3CKDLINAK - UP/DOWN ARROW - DESK CONTRAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES02/08/23100-42100-50210 33406459.99 02/23/231LNC-6N3V-7HHL30 FT INFLATABLE PROJECTOR SCREENAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES02/02/23207-42100-50210 33406269.36 02/23/231DKC-WPRM-THW1BLUTOOTH HEADSETS / PROJECTOR / PHAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES02/12/23207-42100-50210 3340652.68 02/23/231JW1-9WJG-PKKCCABLE KIT / PATCH CABLESAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES02/12/23207-42100-50210 1,083.78 Total For Check 33406 Check 33407 33407731.00 02/23/23BP22-0013ESCROW REFUND 22640 OAKDALE DR 22-BLAIR C BROWN02/10/23100-00000-22205 334071,777.50 02/23/23BCO22-0003ESCROW REFUND 22640 OAKDALE DR 22-BLAIR C BROWN02/10/23100-00000-22206 2,508.50 Total For Check 33407 Check 33408 33408467.04 02/23/23003P33773BRAKE SUPPLIES / ANTI-FREEZEBOYER FORD TRUCKS INC02/13/23100-42100-50220 33408150.24 02/23/23003P33481OIL ELEMENT & GASKET KITS BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC02/06/23100-43100-50220 617.28 Total For Check 33408 Check 33409 33409716.75 02/23/233196LEGAL SERVICESCARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER01/30/23100-00000-22205 33409150.25 02/23/233196LEGAL SERVICESCARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER01/30/23100-00000-22205-056 33409145.00 02/23/233196LEGAL SERVICESCARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER01/30/23100-00000-22205-058 3340987.00 02/23/233196LEGAL SERVICESCARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER01/30/23100-00000-22205-109 334093,513.50 02/23/233196LEGAL SERVICESCARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER01/30/23100-41600-50300 334094,593.79 02/23/233196LEGAL SERVICESCARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER01/30/23100-42100-50304 334091,376.88 02/23/233196LEGAL SERVICESCARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER01/30/23601-49400-50304 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 2/9Page: 02/17/2023 09:19 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/10/2023 - 02/23/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 33409 10,583.17 Total For Check 33409 Check 33410 334101,779.69 02/23/239884559-7 01-23PUBLIC WORKS GAS BILL 12/28/22-01/CENTERPOINT ENERGY 02/01/23100-43100-50380 1,779.69 Total For Check 33410 Check 33411 3341116.80 02/23/2302072023GAS BILL 800014143-4CENTERPOINT ENERGY 02/14/23100-41900-50380 33411366.82 02/23/2302072023GAS BILL 800014143-4CENTERPOINT ENERGY 02/14/23100-45200-50380 383.62 Total For Check 33411 Check 33412 33412133.06 02/23/234145926415BLACK MATSCINTAS - 47002/08/23100-41900-50400 3341255.12 02/23/234145926463LARGE BLUE TOWELSCINTAS - 47002/08/23100-42100-50400 3341216.20 02/23/234145244963LG BATH TOWEL BLUE CINTAS - 47002/01/23100-42100-50400 3341287.81 02/23/234145926446CRT BLUE/CABINETCINTAS - 47002/08/23100-43100-50400 3341218.20 02/23/234145244903GRAY MICROFIBER WIPES CINTAS - 47002/01/23100-43100-50400 33412132.52 02/23/234145244992SM SHOP TOWELS / CRT BLUE CINTAS - 47002/01/23100-43100-50400 33412258.96 02/23/234145926509UNIFORMSCINTAS - 47002/08/23100-43100-50417 33412194.17 02/23/234145245073UNIFORMS CINTAS - 47002/01/23100-43100-50417 896.04 Total For Check 33412 Check 33413 33413909.90 02/23/2392062411385 SHELF FULL FIRST AID CABINET/TRACINTAS - 47012/30/22100-43100-50400 909.90 Total For Check 33413 Check 33414 3341478.00 02/23/23BP22-0024CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0024CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 3341419.50 02/23/23BP22-0025CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0025CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 334149.50 02/23/23BP22-0025-2CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0025CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 3341455.50 02/23/23BP22-0026CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0026CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 33414178.75 02/23/23BP22-0026-2CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0026CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 3341416.25 02/23/23BP22-0026-3CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0026CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 3341416.25 02/23/23BP22-0026-4CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0026CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 3341416.25 02/23/23BP22-0026-5CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0026CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 3341497.50 02/23/23BP22-0014CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0014CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 3341465.00 02/23/23BP22-0014-2CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0014CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 33414130.00 02/23/23BP22-0014-3CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0014CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 3341465.00 02/23/23BP22-0014-4CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0014CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 33414130.00 02/23/23BP22-0014-5CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0014CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 33414130.00 02/23/23BP22-0014-6CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0014CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 33414130.00 02/23/23BP22-0014-7CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0014CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 3341497.50 02/23/23BP22-0014-8CITY PLANNER TIME 22-0014CITY OF CORCORAN02/10/23100-00000-22205 1,235.00 Total For Check 33414 Check 33415 33415139.18 02/23/2302052023CITY HALL/POLICE INTERNETCOMCAST - 002320202/05/23100-41900-50321 33415139.17 02/23/2302052023CITY HALL/POLICE INTERNETCOMCAST - 002320202/05/23100-42100-50321 278.35 Total For Check 33415 Check 33416 33416301.69 02/23/23165707057INTERNETCOMCAST - 93089903502/01/23100-43100-50321 301.69 Total For Check 33416 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 3/9Page: 02/17/2023 09:19 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/10/2023 - 02/23/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 33417 33417225.28 02/23/2302052023PHONE SERVICECOMCAST 004489302/05/23100-43100-50321 225.28 Total For Check 33417 Check 33418 334184,462.38 02/23/231123170SALT SUPPLIESCOMPASS MINERALS01/25/23100-43125-50210 4,462.38 Total For Check 33418 Check 33419 334191,890.00 02/23/23343678AGREEMENT BILLABLE TIME: CONTRACT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH02/08/23100-41920-50300 1,890.00 Total For Check 33419 Check 33420 3342086.00 02/23/23100X07597003PD OFFICE WATER CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER01/31/23100-41900-50210 33420149.04 02/23/23114X89792200OFFICE WATER (JAN 2023)CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER01/31/23100-41900-50210 235.04 Total For Check 33420 Check 33421 33421181.50 02/23/23E4-65129HEATER COOLANT CUMMINS POWER LLC02/01/23602-49450-50210 181.50 Total For Check 33421 Check 33422 33422320.87 02/23/230296980-INDOOR PARTS CUSTOM DOOR SALES INC02/01/23100-43100-50223 320.87 Total For Check 33422 Check 33423 3342311,585.91 02/23/23123120212021 Q4 TOWARDS ZERO DEATH GRANTDAYTON POLICE DEPARTMENT12/31/21100-42100-50430 11,585.91 Total For Check 33423 Check 33424 334245,206.56 02/23/23123120212021 Q4 TOWARDS ZERO DEATH GRANTDEEPHAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT12/31/21100-42100-50430 5,206.56 Total For Check 33424 Check 33425 334251,298.00 02/23/23A32405FIELD TEACHING OFFICERS CERTIFICATECKBERG LAMMERS, P.C.02/06/23100-42100-50207 1,298.00 Total For Check 33425 Check 33426 3342655.40 02/23/23928540ORDINANCE 2022-476ECM PUBLISHERS INC01/12/23100-41900-50350 33426316.60 02/23/23928541JAN 26 PH TAX ABATEMENT ECM PUBLISHERS INC01/12/23100-41900-50350 3342691.23 02/23/23932074ORDINANCE NO. 2022-475ECM PUBLISHERS INC02/02/23100-41900-50350 3342695.20 02/23/23932075ORDINANCE NO. 2022-473ECM PUBLISHERS INC02/02/23100-41900-50350 558.43 Total For Check 33426 Check 33427 3342743.00 02/23/2394329BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONEMPLOYEE RELATIONS, INC.01/31/23100-45200-50300 43.00 Total For Check 33427 Check 33428 33428982.60 02/23/230507531HORNS FERGUSON WATERWORKS #251802/03/23601-49400-50227 3342841,040.00 02/23/230507533WATER METERS FERGUSON WATERWORKS #251802/03/23601-49400-50227 3342872.90 02/23/230507583WATER METERS (3/4 MIP) FERGUSON WATERWORKS #251802/06/23601-49400-50227 33428(117.10)02/23/23CM037859CREDIT - WATER METER (HORNS) FERGUSON WATERWORKS #251802/07/23601-49400-50227 41,978.40 Total For Check 33428 Check 33429 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 4/9Page: 02/17/2023 09:19 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/10/2023 - 02/23/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 33429 3342930.38 02/23/233010315JANUARY 2023 - SUPPORT SERVICES GOPHER STATE ONE CALL01/31/23601-49400-50380 3342930.37 02/23/233010315JANUARY 2023 - SUPPORT SERVICES GOPHER STATE ONE CALL01/31/23602-49450-50380 60.75 Total For Check 33429 Check 33430 33430199.72 02/23/239608653268PAPER TOWEL ROLLSGRAINGER02/14/23100-41900-50200 199.72 Total For Check 33430 Check 33431 33431503.68 02/23/231000198923JAIL CHARGES DEC/2022-JAN/2023HENN CO SHERIFF01/31/23100-42100-50305 503.68 Total For Check 33431 Check 33432 33432360.00 02/23/2320232023 ANNUAL DUESHENN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE AS02/02/23100-42100-50207 33432280.00 02/23/2320232023 ANNUAL DUESHENN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE AS02/02/23100-42100-50433 640.00 Total For Check 33432 Check 33433 334331,622.12 02/23/231000198530POLICE RADIO LEASE 01/2023HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS REC02/01/23100-42100-50323 1,622.12 Total For Check 33433 Check 33434 33434323.88 02/23/231000198597PUBLIC WORKS RADIO LEASE JAN 23HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS REC02/02/23100-43100-50323 323.88 Total For Check 33434 Check 33435 3343555.00 02/23/23003401022300JANUARY 2023 PD CAR WASH HOLIDAY COMPANIES02/01/23100-42100-50403 55.00 Total For Check 33435 Check 33436 33436134.50 02/23/23SO-0235713INTOXIMETER SUPPLIES / PARTSINTOXIMETERS02/09/23100-42100-50210 33436850.00 02/23/23725956INTOXIMETERSINTOXIMETERS02/06/23205-42100-50210 984.50 Total For Check 33436 Check 33437 334371,750.00 02/23/23331469WEBSITE SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE - YEINTRADO INTERACTIVE SERVICES01/26/23100-41900-50210 1,750.00 Total For Check 33437 Check 33438 33438101.00 02/23/232023WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE PRELEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TR02/06/23100-41110-50365 334389,117.00 02/23/232023WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE PRELEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TR02/06/23100-41400-50365 33438451.00 02/23/232023WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE PRELEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TR02/06/23100-41910-50365 33438135,158.00 02/23/232023WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE PRELEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TR02/06/23100-42100-50365 3343833,441.00 02/23/232023WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE PRELEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TR02/06/23100-43100-50365 3343814,018.00 02/23/232023WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE PRELEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TR02/06/23100-45200-50365 33438633.00 02/23/232023WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE PRELEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TR02/06/23601-49400-50365 33438481.00 02/23/232023WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE PRELEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TR02/06/23602-49450-50365 193,400.00 Total For Check 33438 Check 33439 33439116.34 02/23/23021320232023 FSA REIMBURSEMENT LINDA CANTON02/13/23100-00000-21710 116.34 Total For Check 33439 Check 33440 3344088.11 02/23/23709482018 FORD INTERCEPTOR REPAIRS (SQULITHGOW AUTOMOTIVE02/03/23100-42100-50220 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 5/9Page: 02/17/2023 09:19 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/10/2023 - 02/23/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 33440 33440209.09 02/23/23709482018 FORD INTERCEPTOR REPAIRS (SQULITHGOW AUTOMOTIVE02/03/23100-42100-50403 297.20 Total For Check 33440 Check 33441 334411,499.75 02/23/2302072023LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES - LEGAL FMADDEN, GALANTER, HANSEN LLP02/07/23100-41600-50300 1,499.75 Total For Check 33441 Check 33442 334423.07 02/23/2311859CLAMPS AND SCREWSMENARDS MAPLE GROVE02/05/23100-42100-50210 3344215.87 02/23/2311585CARPENTER PENCIL - C. BECHTOLDMENARDS MAPLE GROVE01/31/23100-43100-50210 3344248.75 02/23/2311629NUTS/WASHERS/SCREWS MENARDS MAPLE GROVE02/01/23100-43100-50210 334423.03 02/23/2311520MACHINE SCREW AND LOCK NUTMENARDS MAPLE GROVE01/31/23100-43100-50210 70.72 Total For Check 33442 Check 33443 3344348,373.41 02/23/233575PERMITS FINALED JANUARY 2023METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVIC01/30/23100-42400-50300 48,373.41 Total For Check 33443 Check 33444 3344417,081.40 02/23/230001150220WASTE WATER SERVICES 02/2023METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO01/09/23602-49450-50312 3344417,081.40 02/23/230001151440WASTE WATER SERVICES 03/2023METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO02/02/23602-49450-50312 34,162.80 Total For Check 33444 Check 33445 3344519,880.00 02/23/2301312023JANUARY 2023 SAC CHARGESMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL01/31/23602-00000-20800 33445(198.80)02/23/2301312023JANUARY 2023 SAC CHARGESMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL01/31/23602-00000-36200 19,681.20 Total For Check 33445 Check 33446 33446525.00 02/23/2314207ETI FULL CONFERENCE - C. ANDRESS MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC02/01/23100-42100-50207 525.00 Total For Check 33446 Check 33447 33447268.79 02/23/23455529VEHICLE BATTERY - SQUAD 562NAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/09/23100-42100-50220 33447(18.00)02/23/23455583BATTERY CORE DEPOSIT CREDIT/REFUND NAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/09/23100-42100-50220 3344734.36 02/23/23454166ROCKER LED BLACK/BL, ROCKER LED BLNAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/01/23100-43100-50210 3344718.28 02/23/23454167PENETRANT OIL NAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/01/23100-43100-50210 3344714.20 02/23/23454891OIL FILTER (2) NAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/06/23100-43100-50220 3344784.72 02/23/23454623HOSE FITTINGS / P OUTLETNAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/03/23100-43100-50220 3344714.29 02/23/23455058DURANGO AIR FILTER NAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/07/23100-43100-50220 33447109.68 02/23/23454169PENETRANT OILNAPA AUTO PARTS - Corcoran02/01/23100-45200-50210 526.32 Total For Check 33447 Check 33448 33448192.31 02/23/2302132023DEPENDENT CARE REIMBURSEMENTNATALIE DAVIS MCKEOWN02/13/23100-00000-21710 192.31 Total For Check 33448 Check 33449 33449208.05 02/23/23NT14219PD TRANSCRIPTSNET TRANSCRIPTS INC01/31/23100-42100-50300 208.05 Total For Check 33449 Check 33450 334501,050.00 02/23/237478TIF HOUSING DISTRICT NORTHLAND SECURITIES, INC.02/09/23100-41900-50300 1,050.00 Total For Check 33450 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 6/9Page: 02/17/2023 09:19 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/10/2023 - 02/23/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 33451 33451402.48 02/23/239101259.2MACK TRUCK REPAIR NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT11/18/22100-43100-50220 402.48 Total For Check 33451 Check 33452 334521,224.39 02/23/23123120212021 Q4 TOWARDS ZERO DEATH GRANTORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT12/31/21100-42100-50430 1,224.39 Total For Check 33452 Check 33453 334532,000.00 02/23/2302-23-2023SPRING/SUMMER 2023 NEWSLETTERPOSTMASTER02/14/23100-41130-50350 2,000.00 Total For Check 33453 Check 33454 33454261.17 02/23/2301232023FSA REIMBURSEMENTMIKE PRITCHARD01/23/23100-00000-21710 261.17 Total For Check 33454 Check 33455 3345512,644.17 02/23/2301302023CANCELLED PERMIT #P22-00551 - 1957PULTE HOMES 01/30/23100-42400-50300 12,644.17 Total For Check 33455 Check 33456 3345611,615.12 02/23/23K18934KTA - 56 KEY, 8 CARD, 8 MODULE, 1X REAL TIME NETWORKS INC01/31/23416-42100-50210 11,615.12 Total For Check 33456 Check 33457 33457413.73 02/23/230894-006102250CITY HALL GARBAGE JAN 2023REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/23100-41900-50380 33457334.07 02/23/230894-006103145PUBLIC WORKS GARBAGE JAN 2023REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/23100-43100-50380 33457872.09 02/23/230894-006099732CITY RECYCLING REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/23100-43201-50300 33457114.90 02/23/230894-006104399WILDFLOWER PARK GARBAGE FEB 2023 REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/23100-45200-50380 33457391.66 02/23/230894-006102085CITY PARK GARBAGE FEB 2023REPUBLIC SERVICES01/31/23100-45200-50380 2,126.45 Total For Check 33457 Check 33458 334589,149.60 02/23/23123120212021 Q4 TOWARDS ZERO DEATH GRANTROGERS POLICE DEPARTMENT12/31/21100-42100-50430 9,149.60 Total For Check 33458 Check 33459 3345949.00 02/23/2362943POLICE FORMS ROGERS PRINTING01/10/23100-42100-50200 33459108.00 02/23/2362948PRINTED/LAMINATED MAPSROGERS PRINTING01/10/23100-42100-50200 3345994.50 02/23/2363084BUSINESS CARDS - A. BURNS ROGERS PRINTING02/06/23100-42100-50200 251.50 Total For Check 33459 Check 33460 3346010,706.72 02/23/23123120212021 Q4 TOWARDS ZERO DEATH GRANTSOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PD12/31/21100-42100-50430 10,706.72 Total For Check 33460 Check 33461 334616,986.25 02/23/232035690PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES01/30/23100-00000-22205 33461270.00 02/23/232035690PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES01/30/23100-00000-22205-047 33461202.50 02/23/232035690PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES01/30/23100-00000-22205-056 33461202.50 02/23/232035690PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES01/30/23100-00000-22205-076 33461472.50 02/23/232035690PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES01/30/23100-00000-22205-080 33461270.00 02/23/232035690PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES01/30/23100-00000-22205-087 33461270.00 02/23/232035690PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES01/30/23100-00000-22205-109 33461293.25 02/23/232035690PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES01/30/23100-00000-22205-129 334611,796.25 02/23/232035690PROFESSIONAL SERVICESSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES01/30/23100-43170-50309 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 7/9Page: 02/17/2023 09:19 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/10/2023 - 02/23/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 33461 10,763.25 Total For Check 33461 Check 33462 33462206.24 02/23/23I161361612GA PROJECTILE / TARGETSSTREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT01/27/23100-42100-50207 334622,482.00 02/23/23I1616092BALLISTIC HELMETSSTREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT02/09/23100-42100-50417 3346230.00 02/23/23I1615546BATON (P. EKENBERG)STREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT02/06/23100-42100-50417 334621,431.00 02/23/23I1615127POLICE EQUIPMENT (P. EKENBERG) STREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT02/03/23100-42100-50417 33462219.99 02/23/23I1614527UNIFORMS (RAIN JACKET) - A. BURNS STREICHER'S POLICE EQUIPMENT02/01/23100-42100-50417 4,369.23 Total For Check 33462 Check 33463 33463457.92 02/23/2302012023PD UNION DUES FEB 2023TEAMSTER LOCAL 32001/30/23100-00000-21707 457.92 Total For Check 33463 Check 33464 33464145.55 02/23/2314555FUSE HOLDER, CIRCUIT, WIRETERMINAL SUPPLY CO01/31/23100-43100-50210 145.55 Total For Check 33464 Check 33465 33465284.14 02/23/2301-2023JANUARY 2023 - DRY CLEANING TIDE CLEANERS02/01/23100-42100-50417 284.14 Total For Check 33465 Check 33466 3346675.00 02/23/233609221-202301-PD INVESTIGATIONS - JANUARY 2023TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIV02/01/23100-42100-50300 75.00 Total For Check 33466 Check 33467 33467506.75 02/23/2320222022 GENERAL ELECTIONSHY-VEE 11/04/22100-41410-50210 334677.98 02/23/2302092023COUNCIL WATER CREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/09/23100-41900-50210 3346799.99 02/23/2302072023OTTER.AI - TRANSCRIBING SERVICE CREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/07/23100-41900-50210 334673.49 02/23/2302142023WATER FOR CITY COUNCILCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/14/23100-41900-50210 3346758.00 02/23/2301913SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION - SEMCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/06/23100-41910-50207 33467160.90 02/23/23QRCGPRO-964590QR CODE GENERATOR YEARLY SUBSCRIPTCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/04/23100-41920-50210 33467217.32 02/23/233344149031LODGING (MARCH 26-28, 2023) - C. ACREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/08/23100-42100-50207 33467217.32 02/23/233336256532LODGING (MARCH 07-09, 2023) - C. ACREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/08/23100-42100-50207 33467525.00 02/23/2314215MN CHIEFS OF POLICE - ETI FULL CONCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/04/23100-42100-50207 33467277.02 02/23/23REBPR38851MN BCA MISSING PERSONS/DEATH INV. CREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/03/23100-42100-50207 33467300.00 02/23/2302032023MN BCA MISSING PERSONS/DEATH INV. CREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/03/23100-42100-50207 334671,500.00 02/23/2301202023-ANDRESBCA LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT SUPERVICREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/20/23100-42100-50207 3346725.00 02/23/2301312023MN BCA TAC TRAINING - A. FADDEN CREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/31/23100-42100-50207 334672.00 02/23/2301092023PD TRAINING MEAL ADJUSTMENTCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/09/23100-42100-50207 33467(20.00)02/23/2301-09-2023PD TRAINING MEAL ADJUSTMENTCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/09/23100-42100-50207 33467428.00 02/23/233930715467AUDIO EQUIPMENT (J. LAWSON)CREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/08/23100-42100-50210 33467300.00 02/23/2337248TABLE COVERS N2U / TRUCK SAFETYCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/31/23100-42100-50210 3346760.00 02/23/23590646SQUAD MAINTENANACE FLEETIO02/09/23100-42100-50403 3346775.00 02/23/230C4171204659824POLICE CANINE ASSOC. REGION 12 - CCREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/12/23100-42100-50433 3346772.10 02/23/2302.07.2023PLEAA YEARLY MEMBERSHIPS 2023 - P. PLEAA02/07/23100-42100-50433 33467290.00 02/23/23101471406INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL MEMBERSCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/31/23100-42400-50207 3346752.18 02/23/2302062023TRAINING MEALS CREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/06/23100-43100-50207 334672.05 02/23/23157026774DVS CITY OF DELANO TRANSACTION FEE CREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/10/23100-43100-50220 33467400.98 02/23/233930715467AUDIO EQUIPMENT (J. LAWSON)CREDIT CARD PURCHASES02/08/23207-42100-50210 33467298.67 02/23/2337248TABLE COVERS N2U / TRUCK SAFETYCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/31/23207-42100-50210 33467(0.21)02/23/23722598038.1TRUCK SAFETY SUPPLIES ADJUSTMENTCREDIT CARD PURCHASES01/26/23207-42100-50210 5,859.54 Total For Check 33467 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 8/9Page: 02/17/2023 09:19 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/10/2023 - 02/23/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number Check 33468 33468246.76 02/23/239926268969PD/CH CELL PHONE VERIZON WIRELESS01/26/23100-41900-50321 334681,327.87 02/23/239926268969PD/CH CELL PHONE VERIZON WIRELESS01/26/23100-42100-50321 1,574.63 Total For Check 33468 Check 33469 3346922,870.62 02/23/23PAY 10REMODEL PAY REQUEST #10WEBER, INC.01/24/23400-41900-50520 22,870.62 Total For Check 33469 Check 33470 334701,734.33 02/23/23123120212021 Q4 TOWARDS ZERO DEATH GRANTWEST HENNEPIN PUBLIC SAFETY12/31/21100-42100-50430 1,734.33 Total For Check 33470 Check 33471 334711,790.00 02/23/239204521400R24 SNO+CAP AND CASING WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE02/02/23100-43100-50220 3347130.00 02/23/23920752DURANGO TIRE REPAIRWESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE02/07/23100-43100-50220 1,820.00 Total For Check 33471 Check 33472 33472264.54 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23100-00000-22205-007 33472318.33 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23100-00000-22205-056 334721,072.47 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23100-00000-22205-065 33472588.64 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23100-00000-22205-087 33472303.83 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23100-00000-22205-098 3347251.90 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23100-00000-22205-132 334722,633.14 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23100-41900-50381 3347260.08 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23100-42151-50381 33472242.69 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23100-43100-50381 33472246.73 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23100-45200-50381 3347293.40 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23601-49400-50380 33472330.02 02/23/2335030254718UTILITY SERVICESWRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELECT02/10/23602-49450-50380 6,205.77 Total For Check 33472 Check 33473 3347319,895.00 02/23/23R-020743-000-7HACKAMORE RD FINAL DESIGN & CONSTRWSB01/31/23419-43100-50300 19,895.00 Total For Check 33473 Check 33474 334741,315.75 02/23/23813381453PW BUILDING ELECTRICTY XCEL ENERGY01/25/23100-43100-50381 1,315.75 Total For Check 33474 Check 33475 3347527.96 02/23/238146281399820 CO RD 101 STREET LIGHTXCEL ENERGY02/02/23100-43100-50381 27.96 Total For Check 33475 Check 33476 33476159.79 02/23/23814724791STREET LIGHTING 9525 CAIN ROADXCEL ENERGY02/03/23100-43100-50381 159.79 Total For Check 33476 CHECK REGISTER - COUNCIL INVOICE GL DISTRIBUTION REPORT FOR CITY OF CORCORAN 9/9Page: 02/17/2023 09:19 AM User: jpeterson DB: Corcoran EXP CHECK RUN DATES 02/10/2023 - 02/23/2023 JOURNALIZED PAID - CHECK TYPE: PAPER CHECK Check AmountChk DateInvoice Invoice Desc.VendorInvoice DateGL Number 377,529.05 Fund 100 GENERAL FUND 850.00 Fund 205 DWI FORFEITURE FUND 1,481.47 Fund 207 TRUCK SAFETY 22,870.62 Fund 400 CITY HALL REMODEL 2020-2021 24,828.30 Fund 408 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 11,615.12 Fund 416 CAPITAL-EQUIPMENT CERTS 19,895.00 Fund 419 HACKAMORE UPGRADE (LENNAR) 44,112.06 Fund 601 WATER 54,866.89 Fund 602 SEWER Fund Totals: 558,048.51 Total For All Funds: City of Corcoran February 23, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-15 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran that the following Liquor License is granted effective for the dates as indicated, to the following Licensee, provided appropriate application and insurance documents are submitted and satisfactory background check completed by the Corcoran Police Department. LICENSEE LICENSE LICENSE EFFECTIVE DATE Corcoran Lions 9933 Trail Haven Road Corcoran, MN 55340 1-4 Day Temporary On-sale Liquor License June 2-4, 2023 Tractor Pull at Corcoran Lions Park McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of February, 2023. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk Agenda Item: 7d. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 7e. Council Meeting: January 26, 2023 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Work Session Topic – March 9, 2023 Action Required: Schedule Work Sessions Summary: At the January 12, 2023 meeting, Council discussed work sessions and formalizing topics closer to the scheduled work session dates. Council noted if work sessions were needed, work session topics would be determined and included in the scheduled work session meeting. In fall of 2022, Council discussed reviewing crosswalk options and staff recommended creating a policy outlining when creating pedestrian crossing will be considered and specifications on types of crossing equipment. Staff recommends host ing a work session to discuss crosswalks, pedestrian crossings and related items on March 9, 2023 at 5:30 pm. Financial/Budget: N/A Options: 1. Authorize staff to move forward with work session topic as presented. 2. Provide different work session topic. 3. Decline to schedule work sessions on the topic. Recommendation: Authorize staff to move forward with work session topic as presented. Council Action: Authorize staff to move forward with work session topic as presented. Attachments: None STAFF REPORT Agenda Item : 7f . Council Meeting: Prepared By: Topic : Planning Commission and Parks and Trails Vacancy and Appointment Process Action Required: Summary Financial/Budget: N/A Options: Recommendation: Council Action: Attachments: From:Michelle Friedrich To:Michelle Friedrich Subject:RE: Planning Commission Date:Thursday, February 16, 2023 1:14:38 PM From: Jim Shoulak Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 9:06 PM To: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Planning Commission Hello, Natalie, After careful consideration, I have decided not to pursue another term on the Planning Commission for the City of Corcoran. I appreciate ALL of your help and wisdom shared with me and the other commissioners over the years. Best wishes, Jim Shoulak // Jim Shoulak CITY OF CORCORAN Corcoran Parks and Trails Meeting Minutes January 31, 2023 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran Parks and Trails Commission met on January 31, 2023, in Corcoran, MN, following the meeting being rescheduled from the original January 19, 2023, date. Present were Chairperson Anderson, Vice-Chairperson Meister, and Commissioners Friedrich, Nybo, Strehler, and Wyffels. Absent was Commissioner Christenson. Also present was Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck. 1. Call to Order / Roll Call Chairperson Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2. Pledge of Allegiance Chairperson Anderson invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson Elections Chairperson Anderson informed the Commission that an election needed to occur to determine the chairperson and vice-chairperson for 2023. Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck updated the Commission on term expirations for Commissioner Christenson and Vice-Chairperson Meister. Vice- Chairperson Meister notified the Commission that she did not plan to continue serving on the Commission following her term. Chairperson Anderson expressed to the Commission that he would prefer this be his final year as the Chairperson for the Commission. Motion: Made by Nybo, seconded by Friedrich, to elect Commissioner Anderson as Chairperson. Voting Aye: Anderson, Friedrich, Meister, Nybo, Strehler, and Wyffels. (Motion carried 6:0) Motion: Made by Nybo, seconded by Strehler, to elect Commissioner Christenson as Vice- Chairperson. Voting Aye: Anderson, Friedrich, Meister, Nybo, Strehler, and Wyffels. (Motion carried 6:0) Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck informed the Commission that if Commissioner Christenson did not accept the Vice-Chairperson election, the Commission would be asked to vote on the item again at the February 16, 2023, Parks and Trails Commission meeting. 4. Agenda Approval Motion: Made by Meister, seconded by Friedrich, to approve the agenda as presented. Voting Aye: Anderson, Friedrich, Meister, Nybo, Strehler, and Wyffels. (Motion carried 6:0) 5. Minutes a. Minutes – October 20, 2022, Meeting Motion: Made by Nybo, seconded by Wyffels, to approve the minutes as presented. Voting Aye: Anderson, Friedrich, Meister, Nybo, Strehler, and Wyffels. (Motion carried 6:0) 6. Open Forum Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck informed the Commission that there were no individuals interested in speaking. 7. Presentations – None CITY OF CORCORAN 8. Unfinished Business a. City Park Remaster Update Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck described the history of project, including the recommendation of approval of the 30% concept plan designs by the Parks and Trails Commission, and then subsequently received City Council approval. Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck informed the Commission that staff was working hard to ensure that the RFQ is accurate and detailed to receive the best submissions from consultants. Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck informed Commissioners that she anticipated the RFQ would be in the City Attorney’s hands by the February 16, 2023, Parks and Trails Commission meeting, out to consultants by March 1, 2023, and bonding for the project in 2024. Chairperson Anderson requested clarification on the purpose of the RFQ, to which Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck informed the Commission that the RFQ would be to decide which consultant handles the 70% design of the project. Chairperson Anderson inquired on park usage availability, to which Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck informed the Commission that the park would likely be usable through the entire 2023 spring, summer, and fall seasons. 9. New Business a. 2022 Year in Review and 2023 Priorities Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck provided an overview of the tasks that Parks and Trails Commissioners accomplished in 2022 including recommendations on development plans, 30% design approval for the City Park concept plans, and approval of the Diamond Lake Regional Trail master plan. Recreation Supervisor informed the Commission that following a meeting with Chairperson Anderson and Vice-Chairperson Meister to determine 2023 priorities including additional work on the Diamond Lake Regional Trail, the boardwalk and open space park in Bellwether, City Park remaster RFQ, park dedication fund allocations, educational signs at Wildflower Park, and development/park standards updates. Commissioner Friedrich inquired about if there is a map that shows all the City’s proposed trails with the Diamond Lake Regional Trail superposed on the map, to which Recreation Supervisor informed Commissioners that she would attempt to find one for the Commission. Chairperson Anderson provided an overview of the process for park dedication with regards to trails, at which point park dedication would be taken for trails that are accepted. Chairperson Anderson requested that the proposed 2023 park tour take place once the snow melts, potentially with Public Works Director Mattson, to visit the open space park in the Bellwether development. Chairperson Anderson provided an overview of the open space park and boardwalk that is proposed for the Bellwether development, with Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck informing the Commission that some design preferences were discussed at a previous meeting. Chairperson Anderson noted that the schedule for the year can be adjusted as things arise. 10. Reports/Information a. Active Planning Applications – Informational Only Vice-Chairperson Meister informed the Commission that during the January 12 City Council meeting that she attended, there were discussions of putting in a traffic light, but it was determined that the only way to do that would be to have a gas station in the location as well. Chairperson Anderson inquired about how many new housing permits have been coming in, to which Commissioner Friedrich mentioned that only 3 lots were remaining in Ravinia, over 500 homes platted in Tavera, and noted the completion of the Bass Lake Crossing development. Vice-Chairperson Meister inquired about apartments were proposed at County Road 30 and County Road 101. Katherine Drivas, 6747 Olde Sturbridge Road, informed the Commissioners that Applewood Pointe had informed waitlist individuals that the project was pulled. CITY OF CORCORAN b. Recreation Supervisor Update Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck informed the Commission of items that she had been working on including the City Park remaster RFP, 2022 Holiday Toy and Food Drive, spring baseball registrations, and coordinating with the Public Works Department to open the ice rinks. 11. Subcommittee & Miscellaneous Reports a. City Council Report No discussion occurred. b. Garden Club Report Tom Anderson and Sharon Meister informed the Commission that the Garden Club was looking to hold a meeting in February. Tom Anderson updated the Commissioners on the 2023 annual tree giveaway planning process and informed them that there would be some adjustments to the process in an effort to include individuals that may not have reserved trees in the past. c. Park Dedication Fund Recreation Supervisor Christensen Buck informed the Commissioners that there was approximately $47,000 additional in the park dedication fund since the October 20, 2022 Parks and Trails Commission meeting. 12. Other Business/Announcements – None 13. Commissioner Liaison Calendar 01/26/2023 02/09/2023 02/23/2023 03/09/2023 03/23/2023 04/13/2023 04/27/2023 Strehler Friedrich Nybo Wyffels Christenson Anderson Meister 14. Adjournment Motion: Made by Nybo, seconded by Meister, to adjourn the meeting at 7:51 pm. Voting Aye: Anderson, Friedrich, Meister, Nybo, Strehler, and Wyffels. (Motion carried 6:0) Submitted by Jessica Christensen Buck, Recreation Supervisor City of Corcoran February 23, 2023 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2023-14 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is authorized to accept donations of real or personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 456.03 for the benefit of citizens, and is specifically authorized to accept gifts; and WHEREAS, the City received a monetary donation in the amount of $791.90 from Sports Star Photography for the purpose of parks and recreation programming; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donation as offered for the benefit of the City of Corcoran, and residents; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Corcoran acknowledges the generosity Sports Star Photography and graciously accepts the donation. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of February, 2023. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – City Clerk City Seal Agenda Item: 7g. Page 1 of 6 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 8a. City Council Meeting: February 23, 2023 Prepared By: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl Topic: Sketch Plan for Kariniemi Meadows at 23185 County Road 10 (city file 23-004) Action Required: Feedback Review Deadline: March 27, 2023 1. Request The applicant, Nate Kariniemi is requesting an opportunity to appear before the City Council to solicit informal comments on a sketch plan for a proposed subdivision of the western half of 23185 County Road 10 (Outlot A, Kariniemi Meadows) and the Wicht parcel to the south (PID 18-119-23-11-0002 and 18-119- 23-42-0001). The proposal includes subdividing the property into three commercial lots on the west side of the site and eight rural residential lots on the southwest side of the site, with a large outlot dividing the two uses proposed for the site. 2.Background Kariniemi Meadows received approval of a preliminary plat, variance and final plat for nine rural residential lots on the northeast side of the site in 2022. 3. Analysis Sketch Plan The applicant has submitted a narrative and sketch plan detailing the proposed OS&P plat subdivision. The sketch plan shows eight rural residential lots and three commercial lots. Page 2 of 6 The sketch plan process provides an opportunity for the applicant to get information from the City that can be incorporated into a formal development application. The next steps would be: 1. Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Open Space and Preservation Preliminary Plat 2. Application for Final Plat (and development contract) Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning The proposed land use and zoning for the site will require a change on the western portion of the site from Rural/Ag Residential to Rural Service/Commercial for the land use and Rural Residential to Rural Commercial for the zoning. This is a policy change and the Council has a higher level of discretion when reviewing these types of applications. The proposed commercial land would abut commercial land on the north and the public works garage on the south. The change would allow additional commercial opportunities in the City. Open Space and Preservation Plat (OS&P) Outlot A of the Kariniemi Meadows subdivision retained four development rights through the subdivision process. The Wicht parcel to the south has four existing development rights that can be used in the subdivision of the parcel. Therefore, the sketch plan has eight development rights that can utilized. Three of the available development rights would be used for the three proposed commercial lots and five for the residential lots. The applicant is proposing to develop the residential lots under the Open Space and Preservation (OS&P) Plat standards for a subdivision in the rural residential zoning district with a rural street section which would allow an increase of 150% (1.5) for the development rights. Development Rights = (8 – 3) x 1.5 = 7.5 rounded to 8 development rights. With an OS&P plat, there is an open space requirement that a minimum of 50% of the gross land area of the residential development must be dedicated as preserved open space and 50% (net 25%) of the open space area must be upland area. This area would be protected by a conservation easement or deed restriction put in place during the subdivision process. It is worth noting that upland area in the OS&P ordinance section is defined as the gross acreage minus wetlands and any areas below the ordinary high water level. This is the only place in the City Code that the area is calculated this way. The term used in the rest of the code is “developable area” and is defined as, “gross land area minus wetlands, areas below the 100-year ordinary high water elevation and right-of-way or easements for existing public streets.” The difference between the two is that the 100- year floodplain is excluded from the developable area but not the upland area. Staff is recommending that the term upland area be changed to developable area to make the Page 3 of 6 section consistent with the other areas of the city code. The proposed sketch plan complies with the upland area requirement but would not comply if the term was changed to developable area given the extensive 100 year floodplain present on the site. The sketch plan shows Outlot B (3.2 acres) separate from Lot 9 with a note “to be included” in the area of existing Lot 9 (5.8 acres) of Kariniemi Meadows. It is not clear what the purpose of the combination is as the property is separated from Lot 9 by the creek and would be difficult to access. Additionally, the new combined lot would have the trail easement running through the property. These types of circumstances do exist but are generally undesirable. Outlot B should either be shown as part of Lot 9 with the plat or be retained in Outlot A. Staff notes that the existing accessory buildings on Lot 9 exceed the allowable square footage allowed by code and it appears that the combination would still result in more accessory building area than allowed on a 9.0-acre parcel. Lot Standards The sketch plan appears to show compliance with the RR and CR standards, which require the following minimum standards: OS&P CR (Rural Commercial) Lot Area 4 acres (maximum) 2.5 acres (minimum) Minimum Lot Width 100 feet Minimum Lot Depth 200 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet 100 feet Front, From all other streets 25 feet 50 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 25 feet n/a Side 10 feet 20 feet Rear 25 feet 20 feet Adjacent to Residential n/a 50 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage n/a 50% Shoreland The shoreland overlay district for Rush Creek applies to the area within 300 feet of the ordinary high-water level of Rush Creek or the landward extent of floodplain of the river, whichever is greater. The boundary of the shoreland overlay is indicated on the plans. Page 4 of 6 The boundary of the shoreland may change if the floodplain associated with Rush Creek is revised. This is discussed in the engineer’s memo. The shoreland standards for setbacks, structure height and impervious affect Lots 1-3, Block 1 and Lots 1-5, Block 2. Floodplain The site includes a large area of floodplain and the plans indicate the boundary of the 100-year flood area. As part of a formal submittal, the plans will need to indicate the areas that are considered floodway, flood fringe and general floodplain as defined in Section 1050.030 Subd. 3. Based on the revised boundaries of the districts covering the property, the corresponding standards from Section 1050.030 shall apply. Transportation/Access The applicant is proposing a single public street access to serve the residential lots. The street serving the residential lots will access off Larsen Road. This is supported by Hennepin County. The City engineer provided comments that Larsen Road may need to be improved with this development and turn lanes may be required. The applicant is proposing that commercial lots 1 and 2 share an access with the public works facility. Lot 3 would require a separate access to serve the lot. Hennepin County Transportation provided comments that are included as an attachment to the staff report. They are supportive of the residential access and a combined access for Lots 1 and 2 with the public works facility. They have concerns with the access for Lot 3 and note that turn lanes may be required. If the two northern lots and public works are to share access, staff recommends that a public street be constructed by the applicant. The public works director does not recommend approval of a shared private drive. Because of this, staff suggests that the previous plan with three commercial lots accessing of the new public street per the previous concept may be more cost-effective. Previous Concept Page 5 of 6 Trails and Sidewalks There is an existing on-road trail in the County Road 19 right-of-way and this trail is separated from the street by a landscaped boulevard. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan has a proposed on-road trail shown along the northern boundary of this property on the south side of County Road 10. The County has requested a 10-foot trail easement beyond the right-of-way be included for the on-road trail. The Parks and Trails Plan map in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies a proposed off-road trail that runs along the Rush Creek corridor. A proposed off-road trail was shown along the western side of Rush Creek and along the southern boundary of the plat with the Kariniemi Meadows development. No trail easement was dedicated at the time of the plat as City Engineer requested that the trail be field located to avoid wetland and floodplain impacts. A future trail connection along the northern portion of the property connecting to County Road 19 was identified as part of future phases. The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed the trail with the Kariniemi Meadows plat and recommended a natural trail (mowed grass or wood chips) rather than a paved trail to minimize the impact to the floodplain. If this project moves forward, the new plan will be forwarded to the Commission for feedback. The Council could also provide feedback at this time. Due to the inclusion of the Wicht property to the south, City staff is recommending the southern connection to County Road 19 (shown in blue) that was required with Kariniemi Meadows be revised to follow Rush Creek (shown in red). Additionally, the northern connection would be required with the development of the commercial lots. The Kariniemi Meadows plat required dedication of a trail easement, but the easement has not yet been recorded because we will field locate the trail in the spring/summer. With this plat, we would Previous Plat Current sketch plan Page 6 of 6 recommend the additional northern trail connection be provided and all trail easements be field located and dedicated through the subdivision process. City policy is to require an 8-ft. wide trail in a 20-ft wide easement for off-road trails and give credit for the net area (gross area minus wetlands and areas below the 100-year ordinary high water elevation) of off-road trails shown in the Comprehensive Plan. The trail easement is located almost entirely within the floodplain and the majority of the current easement location will not qualify for park dedication. Utilities The entire site is located outside the MUSA and will be served with well and septic. Ponding Stormwater ponding will need to be provided on site in compliance with local and state requirements. Wetlands There are a number of wetlands on site. The applicant will need to show the wetland buffer and setback requirements in compliance with Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss the sketch plan and provide the applicant with informal comments. Any opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the City Council are considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. Attachments 1. Site Location Map 2. Sketch Plan dated January 26, 2023 3. Applicant’s Narrative dated January 23, 2023 4. Public Safety memo dated February 1, 2023 5. City Engineer’s Memo dated February 13, 2023 6. Hennepin County comments dated February 14, 2023 7. Official Zoning Map 8. 2040 Future Land Use 9. Parks and Trails Plan Hennepin County Property Map Date: 2/16/2023 Comments: 1 inch = 1,600 feet Division in Process The displayed parcel boun dary may not be the actual boundarybecause th is prop erty is in the process of being dividedor replatted. PID: 18119231 30002ADDRESS: 52 Address Pendin g,Co rcoran MN 00000 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2023 COUNTY ROAD 10 COUNTY ROAD 19LARSEN ROAD RUSH CREEK1 1 2 3 OUTLOT A 1 2 3 5 4 3 2 1 3 2 ELLERY LANEPROPO S E D R O A D GARRISON ROAD GARRISON LANECOUNTY ROAD 19OUTLOT B 1-23-23 Nathan Kariniemi T.J.B.1" = 200'P.E.O.Project No. Revised:Checked By: Requested By: Date:Drawn By:Scale: Engineers & Land Surveyors, Inc. 9 West Division StreetBuffalo, MN 55313 (763)682-4727 Fax: (763)682-3522 www.ottoassociates.comdenotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron pipe set and marked by License #40062 denotes iron monument found N Feet 0 200 400 N Vicinity Map Concept Plan OS+P Revised 12/18/20 Please attach a brief description of your project/reason for your request. Page 1 of 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@corcoranmn.gov / Web Site – www.corcoranmn.gov Memo To: Planning (Planners Lindahl and Davis McKeown) From: Lieutenant Burns Date: February 6, 2023 Re: City File 23-004 Kariniemi-Wicht Sketch Plan A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on February 1, 2023. The following were in attendance: Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Planner Davis McKeown, Fire Chief Feist, Fire Chief Leuer, Fire Chief Malewicki, Building Official Geske, and Construction Services Specialist Pritchard. The comments below are based on the preliminary review of the concept plans received by the City on January 23, 2023 and are intended as initial feedback as further plan review will need to be completed as construction plans becomes available. 1. Fire protection, including water supply, will be required and will vary depending on the occupancy of the building, square footage, etc. 2. Additional comments are expected when individual site plans are submitted to the City for approval. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Kariniemi-Wicht Concept Review Date: February 13th, 2023 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents: 1. Concept Plan Kariniemi, Dated January 23rd, 2023 2. Application Kariniemi, Dated January 23rd, 2023 Comments: General: 1. In addition to engineering related comments, the proposed plans are subject to additional planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. 2. Final approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission must be attained before any site grading or activity may commence. 3. An encroachment agreement shall be required for all site improvements or items placed within the City ROW or easements. Plat: 1. The applicant shall have all drainage and utility easements provided and shown and all platting requirements met per the City Code. Drainage and utility easements (5’ – 10’) shall be provided along property lines, as standard per City requirements. 2. D&U easements shall be provided over the 100-year floodplain, over delineated wetlands, and over the wetland buffers. Erosion Control/SWPPP 1. Preparation of and compliance with a SWPPP shall be required for construction. Transportation 1. All roadways shall be constructed in accordance with the City standard details. 2. Hennepin County shall review and approval access locations along County Road 19 for all development entrances. The County may require turn lane improvements at Larsen Road in addition to what is currently present. 3. It is anticipated that Hennepin County would require the consolidation of the existing Public Works entrance with access to Lots 1 and 2 at a minimum. If necessary, the applicant shall be responsible for the construction of a new entrance to service these lots. If necessary, the access road should be further reviewed to ensure it provides adequate access to all public work equipment and vehicles which may access that facility. February 13, 2023 Kariniemi-Wicht Concept Review Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 3 4. A low maintenance trail was approved with the Kariniemi Meadows development. The level of trail improvements and access points may be impacted with this proposed development as the open space in which the trail is located is included with this development. 5. Larsen Road will likely need to be improved with this development. The limits and degree of roadway improvements would be reviewed at the time of the feasibility study. 6. If turn lanes into the project site from Larsen Road are required, the project is to be a City-led project. With City led projects, the developer shall establish an escrow prior to the turn lanes being designed and publicly bid. 7. ROW dedication should be reviewed by Hennepin County. 8. Any parking areas shall have concrete curbing and a paved surface. Site Plans 1. The existing and proposed drainage and utility easements shown shall be clearly labeled on all plan drawings. 2. Street lighting locations shall be reviewed by Public Safety and final lighting locations shall be determined at the time of Final Plat. 3. Each lot and house style will need an individual grading plan with setbacks and potential well locations. Grading /Stormwater 1. The 100-year floodplain extends into the yards of several lots. Flood elevations and limits shall be reviewed at time of preliminary plat to verify extents of stormwater modeling and permitting. 2. A stormwater management plan shall be provided to confirm that stormwater management is in accordance with City of Corcoran and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Standards. 3. Reference the City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines for Development Review for standards for stormwater systems and modeling. 4. The wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage shall also be clearly identified and labeled. 5. Easements shall be provided over all storm sewer pipes. Easements shall be shown on the utility plan to ensure they are adequate. 6. Label clearly on plans the EOF’s for all areas where water will be collected including all low areas in roadways and greenspaces. 7. All drainage swales shall maintain a minimum of 2% slope and all slopes should be 4:1 or flatter unless approved by the City Engineer. 8. A number of wetlands are impacted with this proposed development. They shall be reviewed and approved through the WCA permitting process. 9. At the time of preliminary plat, the wetland buffers should be identified as either newly established wetland buffers or whether they are existing buffers as defined by City Code. February 13, 2023 Kariniemi-Wicht Concept Review Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 3 Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. No City water or sewer is available in the vicinity of this development. 2. It is assumed that all properties will be serviced with private wells and septic systems. 3. All private wells shall be reviewed and permitted by the MDH prior to the time of construction. 4. All private septic systems shall be reviewed and permitted by Hennepin County. End of Comments From:Kendra Lindahl, AICP To:Kevin Shay, AICP Subject:Fwd: Corcoran - CSAH 19 - Kariniemi Meadows Date:Tuesday, February 14, 2023 10:33:29 AM Attachments:23-0104 CONCEPT PLAN 1-23-23.pdf Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform From: KC Atkins <KC.Atkins@hennepin.us> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 9:06:24 AM To: Kendra Lindahl, AICP <KLindahl@landform.net> Cc: Transportation.Plats <Transportation.Plats@hennepin.us>; Dan Patterson <Dan.Patterson@hennepin.us>; Michael D Olmstead <Michael.Olmstead@hennepin.us> Subject: Corcoran - CSAH 19 - Kariniemi Meadows Good morning Kendra, The developer for Kariniemi Meadows reached out to county staff in late January/early February to discuss the attached concept plan in Corcoran. County staff were able to connect with him via Teams on Friday, February 10th to discuss his plans further. We appreciate him connecting early to review concepts along CSAH 19. County staff have the following comments for the city’s consideration: 1. County staff prefer access off of local streets and not county roads due to access spacing and safety concerns 2. As previously agreed upon, access is preferred to be shared with the Corcoran Public Works driveway and turn lanes may be needed at this location due to development 3. The planned use of the 12.8 acres on Parcel 3 along CSAH 19 will impact access recommendations from the county. a. County staff do not prefer an access off of CSAH 19, but recognize there are tradeoffs b. Land use at this location will matter. A single family home with access off of CSAH 19 is very different from a commercial property where we would expect larger vehicles and more volumes of people driving using the access. Understanding this use will help us better determine whether we permit access here or not and whether turn lanes may be required. c. Generally, access is preferred to route to the Public Works driveway to maintain desirable access spacing along CSAH 19 as Corcoran continues to grow 4. County staff support the residential access off of Larsen Road as shown Please let us know if you have any questions or wish to discuss this property further. Thank you, KC KC Atkins, P.E. Senior Professional Engineer | she/her/hersPublic Works – Transportation Planning Hennepin County Public Works |1600 Prairie Drive | Medina, MN 55340Office: 612-596-0354KC.Atkins@hennepin.us| hennepin.us Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message from your computer system. !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!! ! !!! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!î î î s s òñð òñð ñ ñ ï ï î î s ñ ï ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STIEG RD WILLOW DRIVEHACKAMORE ROADTRAIL HAVEN ROADCAIN ROADO A K D A L E D R STREHLER ROAD PIONEER TR COUNTY ROAD 117 ROLLLING HILLS RDLARKIN RD TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CITY OF GREENFIELDCITY OF MAPLE GROVESCOTT LAKEBECHTOLD ROAD$+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUSH CREEK Official Zoning Map 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Zoning Districts: UR Urban Reserve RR Rural Residential RSF-1 Single Family Residential 1 RSF-2 Single Family Residential 2 RSF-3 Single and Two Family Residential 3 RMF-1 Medium Density Residential RMF-2 Mixed Residential RMF-3 High Density Residential MP Manufactured Home Park P-I Public / Institutional TCR Transitional Rural Commercial CR Rural Commercial C-1 Neighborhood Commercial C-2 Community Commercial DMU Downtown Mixed Use GMU General Mixed Use BP Business District I-1 Light Industrial PUD Planned Unit Development ï Cemetery î ChurchsGolf Course ñ Government Building òñð Public Park !!!!!2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area City Limit Open Water Shoreland Overlay District Adopted June 2011 19 10 30 116 101 50 19 10 ± Updated September 2020 City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPioneer Trl TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 S c h u t t e R d Oakdale Dr County Road 10 Horseshoe Trl C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersRd Stieg Rd Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u s h CreekRushCreek South F o rk R u sh Creek SouthForkRu shC reek6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 5/27/2029 1/22/2023 1/22/2023 5/27/2029 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 5/27/2029 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: \\MSPFSV02\DesignDepot\Library\Software\GIS\Client\City of Corcoran\City wide maps\2040 Future Land Use.mxd Date: 10/27/2021 Time: 9:57:35 AM User: LPSRemote Rural/Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public Parks/Open Space Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open Water Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers %Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 County Road 116Oakdale Dr B r id le P a t hJef f reyLnAbilene Ln Trail LnHuntersRdg County Road 30HeatherLn Pion e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 10 Horseshoe Trl Robert LnH o r s e s h o e BendDr Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason Pkw yWillow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19ESt Homestead Trl Maple Hill RdCain RdRolling Hills RdSundanceRdCountry Rd Mohawk DrElmStLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd C ai n Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln OldSettlersRd County R oad 1 1 7 Stieg R d Bechtold RdKalk RdSchutte Rd Meister RdFoxValleyDr M y s tiq u e DrHageDr93rd Ave N Sc hut t e PlBrandywineRdChisholmT rlTessmer Rd HighBluffLnWinchesterTrl JubertLnR u shC reekRushCreek CountyDitchN u m b e rS ixteenCo u n t y Ditch N u mberThreeSouthFor k R u s h C r e e k NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP 79 Page 1 of 14 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 8b. City Council Meeting: February 23, 2023 Prepared By: Natalie Davis McKeown Topic: Amira Village Sketch Plat (PID 25-119-23-12-0002) (City File No. 23-003) Action Required: Direction Review Deadline: March 25, 2023 1.Application Request The applicants (Hempel Acquisition Company represented by Beth Hustad and Steph Griffin) request an opportunity to appear before the City Council to solicit informal comments on a sketch plat for the “Chastek” property at 7600 Maple Hill Rd. The subject property is roughly 38 acres located northeast of the County Road 10 (Bass Lake Rd) and Maple Hill Road intersection. 2.Background The Chastek property previously housed a wholesale greenhouse business known as “Chastek Greenhouses, Inc.” The property was put up for sale in 2022. The land was last platted in 1992 under the name “Chastek Farm” to carve out a 1.5-acre parcel used as a single-family home. The single-family home is not a part of this sketch plan and was recently sold to a private party. Additionally, staff believes there is an existing private access easement that runs along the south property line in favor of the property to the east. 3. Context Zoning and Land Use The proposed property is guided for low density residential and zoned RSF-2 (Single Family Residential 2). There is a small sliver of the property in the southeast corner that is within the Shoreland Overlay District. It appears most of the greenhouses have been Location Map of 7600 Maple Hill Rd Page 2 of 14 removed from the property, but a few structures are still present on the site as of this report. The property is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and Phase 1 of the 2040 Staging Plan. Surrounding Properties The guiding, zoning, and existing use of the surrounding properties are detailed in the table below. All surrounding properties are within the MUSA and Phase 1 of the Staging Plan. Direction Guided Zoning District Use North Medium Density Residential Manufactured Home Park Residential Maple Hills Estates East Low Density Residential RSF-2 Shoreland Overlay Agriculture South Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) Residential Bass Lake Crossing West - Adjacent/enclosed homestead Low Density Residential RSF-2 Residential West - Across Maple Hill Rd - Mixed Use - Public/Semi- Public - Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) - Public / Institutional - Agriculture - Good Shepard Lutheran Church 2040 Future Land Use Map Page 3 of 14 Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2040 Comprehensive Plan’s Natural Resource Inventory Areas map does not reflect any natural communities of note on the subject property. A wetland delineation was completed on this property and finalized in January of this year. This process confirmed five, relatively small, wetlands throughout the property as shown in the image to the right. 4. Analysis Planning staff coordinated review of the sketch plan with Public Works and Engineering as well as the Public Safety team. Memos from the City Engineer and Public Safety are enclosed in this report as well as incorporated into the following analysis as appropriate. The applicant is responsible for reviewing the entirety of both memos and incorporating the feedback as the project moves forward. Use The concept plan for “Amira Village” proposes an age-restricted, 55+ active adult/senior living rental community to be developed by United Properties. The plan includes 141 single-family villas with two-car attached garages, smart-home technologies, and either a deck or patio. The narrative explains the intention to provide the following amenities within the community: - Centrally located clubhouse with an outdoor kitchen. - Fitness center. - Social room with prep kitchen facilities. - Outdoor pool and hot tub. - Pickleball and bocce ball courts. - A pet exercise area. All of these uses are permitted by-right within the RSF-2 zoning district. Wetland Delineation Exhibit Page 4 of 14 Density The concept plan estimates a net density of roughly 3.9 unites/acre. This is within the required 3-5 units per acre required for the low density residential land use designation. The math behind the calculation was not included in the application submittal. It is possible the post-development calculations will come back slightly higher than 3.9 units/acre once features such as wetlands and wetland buffers are removed from the calculations. Staff believes the proposed development would still be within the 3-5 units/acre range. Lot Analysis The lot standards for the RSF-2 district are as follows: RSF-2 Standard Minimum Lot Area 11,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 80 ft. Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks - Front, Major Roadways 100 ft. - Front, All Other Streets 20 ft. - Front Porch (less than 120 sq. ft.) 15 ft. - Side (living) 10 ft. - Side (garage)* 5 ft. Sketch Plat Page 5 of 14 - Rear 30 ft. Maximum Principal Building Height 35 ft. * Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 ft. However, residential PUDs are more often compared to the district standards of RSF-3. The Zoning Ordinance states that the RSF-3 district “is intended to be the primary single-family zoning district for future residential developments.” The setbacks are the same in RSF-3 as RSF-2, but there are smaller lot size standards as provided in the table below. RSF-3 Standard Minimum Lot Area 7,500 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 65 ft. The concept plan proposes 39 lots with a width of 44’ and 102 lots with a width of 50’. The home sizes are expected to range from 1,200 sq. ft. to 2,500 sq. ft. The sketch plan notes proposed standards to be considered under a Planned Unit Development (PUD) district (areas where flexibility is desired are in red text): Proposed PUD Standards Standard Minimum Lot Area Not provided; but it appears flexibility would be required. Minimum Lot Width 44’ Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks - Front Setback 20’ - Front Porch (less than 120 sq. ft.) 15’ - Minimum Side Setback 4’ - Minimum Rear Setback 20’ Maximum Principal Building Height 35 ft. For the sake of comparison, Bellwether was approved with a minimum lot width of 44’, and Bass Lake Crossing South was approved with a minimum lot width of 40’. These PUDs were approved with a minimum lot area of 5,000 sq. ft. and 5,103 sq. ft, respectively. Several residential PUDs have a 5’ side setback with a minimum separation between structures of 10’. The City has not approved a PUD with side setbacks of only 4’ before, but this does meet fire code with the use of a firewall. A rear setback of 20’ was granted in Rush Creek Reserve. The more common rear setback granted to PUDs is 25’. The Council is asked to provide feedback on the proposed PUD lot standards. The City recently approved an updated lot width definition to allow lots on a cul-de-sac to measure the lot width at the required front setback. However, staff notes that there are a few lots on a curve, but not a cul-de-sac, that are shown as a 50’ lot but may measure less than 44’ wide at the front property line. The lot dimensions would be Page 6 of 14 further reviewed as part of a preliminary PUD/plat application. The Council should provide feedback if they are willing to consider allowing lots on a curve to measure the lot width at the required front setback as part of a PUD. This flexibility has been granted for previous PUDs, such as Rush Creek Reserve. Shoreland Overlay District The standards for the Shoreland Overlay are provided in Section 1050.020 of the Zoning Ordinance. The shoreland overlay district extends 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of Cook Lake. The district boundary is indicated on the plans along the southeast corner of the property and crosses over lots 34-39. Cook Lake is a Natural Environment Lake, so there are additional lot standards applied which are outlined in the table below. Areas where flexibility would be required are provided in red. Shoreland Overlay Proposed PUD Standards Lot 34-39 Minimum Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft. Estimated 6,250 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 125’ 50’ Setback from OWHL 150’ 150’ Impervious Surface Limit 25% Percentage unclear; building pad, driveway, and patio/deck will likely exceed 25%. The Council may choose to discuss if they are open to PUD standards that deviate from the Shoreland Overlay District standards and to what extent. Previous PUDs that allowed flexibility from the Shoreland Overlay District standards include Bass Lake Crossing and Cook Lake Highlands. Residential Architectural Standards Section 1040.040, Subd. 8 provides design standards for single-family homes that are applicable to properties within the RSF-1, RSF-2, and RSF-3 zoning districts. The applicant would be expected to comply with these standards unless specific flexibility is requested and granted. Three concept elevations were provided in the application submittal and are attached to this report. Further, the narrative explains the exterior design of each home will be harmonious with varied elevations and color schemes. The code requires a minimum of five different front elevations styles through the development. At least two additional elevation styles will need to be added that provide additional variations in color, accents, and/or building materials. Shoreland Overlay District Boundary Page 7 of 14 The front elevation must consist of brick, stone, stucco, fiber cement board, redwood, cedar, or a similar material with a minimum of two different materials required. Vinyl can also be used with a minimum of 3 different variations in color, style, and/or material required. Additionally, the front elevation shall have no more than 75% of any one type of exterior finish unless the finish is brick, stucco, and/or stone. Not enough information was provided to confirm the submitted elevations comply with these standards. The building materials and percentages would need to be confirmed in the preliminary application. The residential architectural standards require the front elevation to consist of doors, windows, and variations of the wall face with the use of architectural elements such as pilasters or columns, wainscots, or canopies. The submitted concept plans do not comply with this standard, and an architectural element will need to be added to the elevations. Garages must be architecturally styled to match the exterior design of the home and must not comprise more than 55% of the viewable ground floor street- facing linear building frontage. The concept elevations look to be able to comply with this standard. However, the measurement and percentage of the garage structure would be confirmed with the preliminary application. Allowable roofing materials include asphalt shingles, wood shingles, concrete, clay, ceramic tile, or residential steel roofing with hidden fasteners. Roof overhangs must be at least 12 inches. It appears the submitted concept elevations will be able to comply with these standards. Each façade that is visible from a street shall receive equal architectural treatment. This will likely be necessary for lots 3-7, 8-13, 34-35, 51-52, 73-74, 88, 60, 89, 95-96, and Concept Elevation 1 Concept Elevation 2 Page 8 of 14 102 of the 50’ wide lots. Additionally, lots 1, 5-6, 11, 26, 35, and 39 of the 44’ wide lots may also have an additional façade visible from a street. All other elevations that are not visible from a street must make an effort to incorporate elements from the front elevation, and each side elevation must include at least one window or door opening. Finally, a maximum of 18 inches of the foundation may be exposed on any elevation. Again, the applicant has not requested flexibility from the underlying residential architectural standards at this time. However, the Council may choose to discuss whether any standards may be negotiable and to what extent. Streets & Access The sketch plan shows a central primary access into the development from Maple Hill Rd. The plans reflects a design compatible with a future connection to Fir Lane North to the southeast when the property to the east is developed. The homes in the northwest corner look to be served by a private road with a cul-de-sac. The applicant’s narrative explains that the cul- de-sac and road in the northwest corner of the site could be adjusted to allow for a secondary access from Maple Hill Rd to support emergency vehicles. Staff prefers that the applicant work with the property owner to the east to extend Fir Lane Concept Elevation 3 Northwest Corner Access Page 9 of 14 North as a part of the Amira Village development. However, the Engineering Memo provides that the proposed emergency access in the northwest corner is an option if approved by Public Safety. The Public Safety Memo notes that a minimum road width of 20’ is required for emergency vehicles and recommends no parking signs to be posted along the roadway in the northwest corner (particularly if it remains a cul-de-sac). Public Safety would review the plans further at the time of the preliminary application. The Engineering Memo explains that improvements to Maple Hill Rd will likely be needed. A feasibility study will be required to understand the extent of improvements required. Upgrades to the condition of Maple Hill Rd will likely benefit existing residents that utilize Maple Hill Rd (Bass Lake Crossing, Maple Hill Estates, etc.) as well as the users of Good Shepard Lutheran Church. Historically, this has been seen as a PUD benefit for other developments. The Council may choose to discuss whether they see improvements to a pre-existing condition a PUD benefit to offset requested flexibilities. Finally, staff recommends a ghost plat for the exception parcel to show how access could be removed from Maple Hill Drive and be served by Amira Village should that parcel be redeveloped. Parking Parking standards are provided in Section 1060.060 of the Zoning Ordinance. Single- family homes require two parking spaces per unit. The narrative and concept elevations confirm the homes will have attached 2-car garages. This, in addition to parking space within driveways, satisfies the parking requirements. However, the Council may choose to discuss whether they think additional guest parking should be accommodated on the site as a part of PUD negotiations. Guest parking has not been typically required for single-family home PUDs in the past. The parking performance standards require a 10’ side setback that is applied to drive aisles/driveways. The concept plan does not provide driveway locations, so it is unclear if flexibility to the driveway setback is necessary for this project. Based on the concept elevations submitted with the application, it appears likely that a 5’ driveway setback would be needed. For reference, Bass Lake Crossing has a 5’ driveway setback from the side property lines. The Council may choose to provide feedback on whether they are open to considering a similar setback for the Amira Village development. Utilities The Engineering Memo touches on various items related to municipal sewer and water for the site. As part of the feasibility study, Engineering will review the need to loop the watermain to the existing water network to the south. Valve and hydrant locations will be reviewed at the time of final plat, and the Public Safety Memo recommends locating a fire hydrant within 100’ of the common building shown on the sketch plat. Stormwater Management Page 10 of 14 The concept plan shows 5 stormwater ponds located on the western half of the site. The Engineering Memo explains the site currently drains to the northeast where there is a lowland area adjacent to Maple Hill Estates. Additionally, there may be an existing drain tile which also contributes to drainage patterns going east. Drainage for the site will be reviewed further with the preliminary and final plats as part of a stormwater management plan to ensure stormwater is managed without impacting adjacent properties and complies with the City’s and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission’s standards. Wetlands There are five wetlands located on the site. Two of the wetlands are considered seasonally flooded basins (Type 1), and the remaining three wetlands are considered fresh wet meadows (Type 2). None of these wetlands are included on the City’s Natural Resources Communities Quality Ranking Map. The City assumes wetlands not included on this map to be of medium quality. However, there is a MNRAM process with the State of MN the applicant can pursue to confirm the wetlands are considered low quality to reduce the required buffer area. Based on the concept plan, it appears the applicant plans to impact three of the wetlands while preserving the two wetlands along the northern border of the property. Impacts to wetlands must be reviewed and approved through the appropriate WCA permitting process. If for some reason approval is not granted, the lot design would need to be modified accordingly to avoid the wetland(s) and account for the required wetland buffer(s). Wetland buffers will be required for any unimpacted wetlands and will need to be shown along with the required wetland buffer monuments at the time of preliminary plat. The applicant will need to confirm whether they plan to use existing buffers as allowed and defined by City Code or if they plan to establish new buffers. Lighting Street lighting will be required as a part of the development. A lighting plan was not provided, but the applicant would be expected to comply with the performance standards in Section 1060.040 of the Zoning Ordinance. Street lighting locations will be reviewed by Public Safety with the final lighting locations determined at the time of final plat. Landscaping Page 11 of 14 A detailed landscaping plan was not provided. Landscape standards are provided in Section 1060.070 of the City Code. Residential uses must provide one overstory tree per dwelling unit. The applicant is expected to comply with this standard. The Council may choose to discuss whether they believe more vegetation requirements should be established as a part of the PUD negotiations. The concept plan seems to show a boulevard area within the primary entrance of the development. Previous Councils have seen a well landscaped boulevard visible from public streets as a PUD benefit. The Council may choose to discuss whether additional landscaping of this boulevard is a PUD benefit they would consider to offset the requested flexibilities. Trails and Parks A proposed off road trail is shown along the northern property line in the Parks and Trails Plan in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This trail is reflected on the proposed sketch plat. The developer would get park dedication credit for the area of the easement for the off-road trail. The developer is responsible for the base (grading and gravel) of the trail, and the City typically reimburses the developer for pavement. However, if the developer is open to paving the trail at their cost, then this has historically been considered a public benefit for PUDs. The Council may choose to discuss whether they believe this could be a benefit of the PUD to offset some of the requested flexibilities. The trail location would be further reviewed by the Parks and Trails Commission at the time of preliminary plat. Signage No signage is discussed in the narrative or shown in the sketch plan. Signs throughout the development must comply with Chapter 84 of the City Code. Residential uses are allowed 2 freestanding signs with a sign copy area of up to 32 sq. ft. with a height of 6’. Entrance Boulevard 2040 Parks and Trails Plan Page 12 of 14 Rental Dwelling Ordinance Draft The applicant’s narrative explains United Properties hopes to provide the single-family homes in Amira Village as a rental housing option for seniors. The City Council is working on a rental dwelling ordinance that would limit the amount of rental licenses that can be owned by a single entity as well as the density of rental dwelling units on a block within low density residential areas (5 units/acre or less). As the draft is currently written, the Council would need to grant an exemption for United Properties. This process is still being outlined, and the ordinance is not yet in effect. The Council may choose to consider whether an intentional rental community with full-time, on-site management is a situation where an exemption would be justified should the Ordinance move forward. The density limit would also need to be waived for this development under the current rental draft. The draft allows this to be done under a “temporary” permit, so should the Council consider allowing the exemption, the draft will likely need to be revised to allow the Council to grant a long-term permit. This revision could be made specific to intentional rental developments. Buffer Ordinance Draft Based on the most recent draft of the buffer ordinance reviewed at the January 26th Council Work Session, a buffer yard would be required on the east and south property lines. Along the east property line, a buffer yard class of “A” would apply. The planted buffer yard options are provided in the table below. Along the south property line, the development would be required to maintain a side and rear setback equivalent to the rear setback, but no additional plantings are required. This could make lot 34 of the 50’ wide lots unbuildable. This development would not be expected to buffer from the trailer park. Buffer Yard Class Width Overstory Plantings Understory Plantings Shrubs Structures A 10’ 1 2 0 None 15’ 1 1.5 0 None 20’ 0.5 1.25 0 None As of this staff report, the Buffer Ordinance is not yet adopted. However, it appears a small buffer yard along the east property line could be accommodated. It may result in smaller lots than anticipated in this area of the development, but the Council can choose to discuss if they see this as a PUD benefit for negotiations to offset the requested flexibilities. Summary of Flexibilities & Benefits for Discussion The applicant specifically asked for the following PUD standards that deviate from the RSF-2 and RSF-3 district standards: - Lot width minimum of 44’. Page 13 of 14 - Side setback of 4’. - Rear setback of 20’. Additionally, staff noted the following flexibilities that will likely be needed for the plan to move forward as drafted: - A reduced lot size from the 7,500 square feet allowed in RSF-3. - Lot width minimum of 50’ within the Shoreland Overlay. - Minimum lot size of approx. 6,250 square feet within the Shoreland Overlay. - An increased maximum impervious surface limit within the Shoreland Overlay District. - Measuring lot width at the required front setback for lots on a curve. - A 5’ driveway setback from the side property lines. Lastly, understanding the intention to establish a rental dwelling ordinance, the applicant is requesting Amira Village be considered for an exemption from the license and density caps currently contemplated in the draft. The following potential benefits for negotiation were identified in the staff report: - Improvement of Maple Hill Road to the benefit of existing residents, church users, and future residents. - A landscaped boulevard at the development entrance. - Pavement of a public trail at the developer’s expense. - A planted buffer along the east property line. - Additional landscaping standards. Additionally, staff believes an argument could be made that Amira Village ensures an appropriate transition between the 50’ lots of Bass Lake Crossing to the south and the manufactured home park to the north. This is currently listed as an intent/goal of the PUD district and may be seen as a public benefit. Next Steps Assuming this project moves forward, the next steps are outlined below: 1. Feasibility Study. 2. A land use application for a Rezoning, Preliminary PUD Plan, and Preliminary Plat. 3. A land use application for a Final PUD and Final Plat. 4. Watershed approval of City-approved final grading and stormwater plans. 5. WCA permitting for wetland impacts. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss the sketch plat and provide the applicant with informal comments. The Council should provide clear direction to the applicant so that they can decide whether to proceed with a formal application. Any Page 14 of 14 comments given by the City Council are advisory in nature and non-binding. While the comments are non-binding, the applicant will consider the input from the City Council when they prepare their formal submittal. Attachments: 1. Applicant’s Narrative 2. City Engineer’s Memo 3. Public Safety Memo 4. Sketch Plat 5. Amira Village Concept Packet with Elevations 250 Nicollet Mall, Ste 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (952) 835-5300 1331 17th Street, Ste 604 Denver, CO 80202 (720) 898-8866 1617 West 6th Street, Ste A Austin, TX 78703 (512) 866-6500 Amira Village — Concept Sketch Plan Review Project Narrative Chastek Greenhouse Parcel Corcoran, MN January 23, 2023 The proposed development — branded as “Amira Village” — is an age-restricted, 55+ Active Adult/Senior Living rental community to be developed by United Properties. The planned community will encompass approximately 40 acres of land, currently occupied by Chastek Greenhouse, Inc. Located north of the existing Bass Lake Crossing development and east of Maple Hill Road, the site will have primary access off Maple Hill Road and designed for a future connection extension to Fir Lane North. A secondary access to Maple Hill Rd is included in the concept design to support the needs of emergency vehicles if needed. Situated in a growing area, our residents will have easy access to shopping, dining, healthcare and recreational opportunities. Amira Village will offer approximately 141, well-appointed single-family villa homes, featuring flexible floorplans and a wide variety of amenities for a vibrant, maintenance-free lifestyle: • Centrally located clubhouse with outdoor kitchen • Fitness Center • Social room with prep kitchen facilities • Outdoor pool / hot tub • Pickleball Courts and Bocce Ball 250 Nicollet Mall, Ste 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (952) 835-5300 1331 17th Street, Ste 604 Denver, CO 80202 (720) 898-8866 1617 West 6th Street, Ste A Austin, TX 78703 (512) 866-6500 • Pet exercise area Amira Village will offer maintenance-free living with thoughtfully designed indoor and outdoor spaces and premium finishes and fixtures. Home sizes start at approx. 1,200 sf on 44’ wide lots and will range from 1,450 to 2,500 sf on the 50’ wide lots. There will be a mix of patio homes and floor plans with basements. All homes will consist of two-car attached garages, quality finishes, smart-home technologies and will incorporate a deck or patio. The exterior design of each home will be harmonious to its surroundings and feature beautiful architecture, non-monotonous elevations, and varying color schemes. The beautifully landscaped grounds will pay specific attention to enhancing the central common area and buffering for the yards of neighbors immediately north and south. Sidewalks, walking paths and programmed activities located within the community are designed to encourage physical activity and social engagement. United Properties works with preeminent local operators who employ an on-site community manager, maintenance technician, and life enrichment director, to deliver best-in-class services for our residents. Rental rates will vary based on home size and will be very competitive to the cost of homeownership. Monthly rent will include high-speed internet, cable television, water & sewer, trash removal, home maintenance, as well as landscaping, snow removal services, and secured access to all common amenities. Rental terms are flexible and designed for residents to “Lock & Leave” as they enjoy the freedom to travel, volunteer, or pursue their passions. Amira’s core values include creating a sense of belonging for every resident —a commitment to fostering a sense of community and prioritizing meaningful experiences. Our communities provide older adults the opportunity to live and thrive within environments where they feel supported, engaged and connected. Residents can focus on what matters most to them: community, family, friends, interests and more. A robust calendar of scheduled activities encourages creativity and wellness for a fun and active lifestyle. 250 Nicollet Mall, Ste 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (952) 835-5300 1331 17th Street, Ste 604 Denver, CO 80202 (720) 898-8866 1617 West 6th Street, Ste A Austin, TX 78703 (512) 866-6500 United Properties’ 18 years of experience in senior living sets a new standard for senior housing options with forward-thinking designs and resident-focused solutions. United Properties has completed over 30, multi-family projects that support the full continuum of senior living and currently owns over 1,200 units. United Properties is excited to expand its Amira brand to include this innovative single-family community model, fittingly named Amira Village. Sincerely, Dave Young Vice President United Properties Encl: Concept Site Plan Concept Elevations Concept Imagery Community Map Amira Family Brands Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Amira Village - Chastek Concept Review Date: February 13th, 2023 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following document: 1. Concept Plan – Amira Village, Dated January 23rd, 2023 Comments: General: 1. In addition to engineering related comments, the proposed plans are subject to additional planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. 2. Final approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission must be attained before any site grading or activity may commence. 3. An encroachment agreement shall be required for all site improvements or items placed within the City ROW or easements. 4. A demolition permit shall be obtained prior to construction activities beginning. Plat: 1. The applicant shall have all drainage and utility easements provided and shown and all platting requirements met per the City Code. Drainage and utility easements (5’ – 10’) shall be provided along property lines, as standard per City requirements. 2. Existing easements which conflict with the proposed plan will need to be vacated, and City is aware of an access agreement for adjacent property owner along the south property line. Erosion Control/SWPPP 1. Preparation of and compliance with a SWPPP shall be required for construction. Transportation 1. All roadways shall match City standard details. 2. It is anticipated that improvements to Maple Hill Road will be necessary with this development. The scope for the roadway improvements would be further reviewed at the time of the feasibility study. 3. The private road for possible public ROW access should be reviewed by public safety. Private roads shall at a minimum be constructed to the city standard section. 4. Temporary turnarounds meeting City standards are required at the end of dead-end streets to facilitate emergency vehicle movements. 5. Access provided to exception piece in future. February 13, 2023 Amira Village - Chastek Concept Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 Site Plans 1. The existing and proposed drainage and utility easements shall be clearly shown and labeled on all plan drawings. 2. Street lighting locations shall be reviewed by public safety and final lighting locations shall be determined at the time of final plat. 3. If access to the adjacent Bass Lake Crossings development is necessary, applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary easements for the access. Grading /Stormwater 1. Stormwater from the site generally drains to the northeast of the site to a lowland area adjacent to the neighboring property Maple Hill Estates. It is believed that an existing draintile also drains the area to the east. The drainage in this area will need to be reviewed with the preliminary plat and final plat to ensure drainage from this site is managed without impacting adjacent properties. o Any offsite drainage improvements necessary to mitigate the proposed development is the developer responsiblity. This will be reviewed with the feasibility study. 2. The southern property line has wetlands and WCA process will determine if the lots need to be modified or if the wetlands can be impacted. 3. A stormwater management plan shall be provided to confirm that stormwater management is in accordance with City of Corcoran and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Standards. 4. Reference the City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines for Development Review for standards for stormwater systems and modeling. 5. The wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage shall also be clearly identified and labeled. 6. Label clearly on plans EOF’s for all areas where water will be collected including all low areas in roadways and greenspaces. 7. All drainage swales shall maintain a minimum of 2% slope and all slopes should be 4:1 or flatter unless approved by the City Engineer. 8. If wetlands are impacted, they shall be reviewed and approved through the appropriate WCA permitting process. 9. At the time of preliminary plat, the wetland buffers should be identified as either newly established wetland buffers or whether they are existing buffers as defined by City Code. Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. Plan and profiles for all utilities shall be provided at the time of final plat submittals. 2. Valve locations to be reviewed at time of final plat. Generally, valves shall be located at all intersection as one less valve than the number of legs. Valves should typically be located out from the end radius points unless specific circumstances don’t allow. 3. Hydrant spacing to be reviewed by Public Safety at time of final plat. 4. Watermain likely will need to be looped to the existing water network to the south. Additional details will be reviewed at the time of the feasibility study. End of Comments Page 1 of 1 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@corcoranmn.gov / Web Site – www.corcoranmn.gov Memo To: Planning (Planners Lindahl and Davis McKeown) From: Lieutenant Burns Date: February 6, 2023 Re: City File 23-003 Amira Village (Chastek Property) Sketch Plan A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on February 1, 2023. In attendance were: Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Planner Davis McKeown, Fire Chief Feist, Fire Chief Leuer, Fire Chief Malewicki, Building Official Geske, and Construction Services Specialist Pritchard. The comments below are based on the preliminary review of the concept plans received by the City on January 23, 2023 and are intended as initial feedback as further plan review will need to be completed as construction plans becomes available. 1. Recommended to post no parking signs on the private road shown in the northwest corner of the property. 2. The cul-de-sac in the northwest corner of the site must be built to City spec. 3. Private roads must be at least 20’ wide for fire access. 4. A review of all the hydrant locations will be required with the fire chief for final approval. • Recommend locating a fire hydrant within 100’ of the common building. 5. Prefer the future access point shown in the southeast portion of the site to be constructed at the time of the project, not with a future project. PONDMAPLE HILL DRIVECOOK LAKE COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS BASS LAKE CROSSING EXCEPTION OHW 942.1POND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETL A N D POOLCLUB HOUSEPICKLE BALL POND FUTURE ACCESS ONTO FIR LANE FIR LANEPOND PONDRUSH CREEK GOLF COURSE POTENTIAL PUBLIC ROW ACCESS POINT c 1OFCHASTEK PROPERTY CORCORAN, MINNESOTA TREK DEVELOPMENT1-20-2023 JLT JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2022 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS xx I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 1 SITE DATA: GROSS AREA: ±38.1 ACRES WETLAND/FLOODPLAIN: ±1.5 ACRES NET DEVELOPABLE AREA: ±36.6 ACRES ZONING: RSF-2 2040 GUIDE PLAN: LD LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (3-5 UNITS/ACRE) PROPOSED UNITS: 141 50' VILLA: 102 44' VILLA: 39 NET DENSITY: ±3.9 UNITS/ACRE RSF-2 STANDARDS: AREA: 11,000 SF WIDTH: 80' FRONT SETBACK: 20' GARAGE, 15' FRONT PORCH SIDE SETBACK: 10' LIVING SPACE, 5' GARAGE MINIMUM STRUCTURE SEPARATION 15' REAR SETBACK: 30' PROPOSED PUD STANDARDS: VILLA LOTS: WIDTH: 50' AND 44' FRONT SETBACK: 20' SIDE SETBACK: 4' REAR SETBACK: 20' CONCEPT PLAN 7 WETLAND EDGE (ESTIMATED) PROPOSED TRAIL POSSIBLE PUBLIC ROW ACCESS LOCATION PUBLIC ROW LENGTH: 5,300 LF PRIVATE DRIVE LENGTH: 600 LF MAPLE HILL DRIVE LENGTH: 1,330 LF Page 1 of 5 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 8c. City Council Work Session: February 23, 2023 Prepared By: Chris Hong through Kendra Lindahl, AICP Topic: Buffer Yard Draft Ordinance (City file 22-034) Action Required: Review 1.Description of request The Council directed staff to conduct additional research and make edits to the buffer yard ordinance that was reviewed on January 26, 2023. 2. Background The Council held a work session on May 12, 2022 to review the 2022 Council work plan and priorities related to natural resource ordinance updates. They discussed how buffer yard requirements would be applied, what the standards would be and how to equitably apply it as land develops and redevelops. The Council directed staff to bring back buffer yard requirements from other municipalities to see what options are available. The Council held a work session on October 27, 2022 to discuss the pertinent questions that arose from staff’s research. These included how the buffer yard requirements would be determined, what the standards of the buffer yards would be and who would own and manage them. Staff prepared a revised ordinance to reflect the Council direction. The Council held a work session on January 26, 2023 to review the draft buffer ordinance written by staff. Council suggested changes to the draft ordinance and requested that staff conduct additional research on how other municipalities implement and enforce buffer yard requirements. 3.Implementation and Enforcement Staff reviewed the buffer yard implementation and enforcement measures in the City Codes of cities with existing buffer yard ordinances. We then discussed how they are implemented and enforced with their respective city planners. Medina City Code: A document, in a form provided by the city, shall be recorded against the property over which a buffer yard lies. This document shall include, at a minimum, the location of the buffer yard, the restrictions on the use of this property, and the maintenance responsibility for the landscaping and improvements. (Section 828.31 Subd. 9) Page 2 of 5 Planner: Buffer yards are required to be managed by a homeowner’s association (HOA). The language regarding their maintenance varies by HOA. Ramsey City Code: Vegetative Buffer "A" - A minimum 25 feet width in common ownership with the following planting schedule per 100 feet of property boundary adjacent to an impacted use (Section 117-110(c)(2)b.1.i.) Planner: Buffer yards are required to be put into an easement to ensure maintenance. If a landowner is preserving existing trees to satisfy their buffer yard requirement, that forested area is put into a tree preservation easement. Rochester City Code: It is the responsibility of the landowner to maintain the bufferyard in a condition consistent with the approved plan. Failure to maintain the bufferyard and its components in a condition consistent with the approved plan shall be a misdemeanor. (Section 63.260) Bufferyards may remain in the ownership of the original developer (and assigns) of a land use, or they may be transferred to any consenting grantees, such as adjoining landowners, a park or forest preserve district (the City of Rochester) or an open-space or conservation group, provided that any such conveyance adequately guarantees the protection and maintenance of the bufferyard for its intended purpose. (Section 63.267) Planner: The existence of the bufferyard is verified during the certificate of occupancy review to close out the building permit. In Medina and Ramsey, there is a discrepancy between implementation and enforcement requirements as stated in the Code and what is required in practice. Medina’s City Code does not explicitly state that the buffer yard is required to be managed by a homeowner’s association. Ramsey’s Code only states that the buffer yard be in “common ownership” without stating how that occurs. Planners in both cities remarked that enforcement is an ongoing challenge. The planner in Rochester could not recall a time where a buffer yard was impacted but noted that it would be treated as a zoning violation if that happened. The draft ordinance requires easement to protect the buffer to be drafted and recorded against the property. Staff was unable to connect with the City Attorney to draft a template easement for Council review, but we believe that the attached example from Ramsey could serve as a model for a Corcoran template. As noted by Ramsey city staff, enforcement can be a challenge and has been handled on a complaint basis. The Council should discuss how they envision the buffer easements being monitored (if at all) in Corcoran. Page 3 of 5 4. Analysis Section 1060.070 describes the landscape standards, including screening and buffering. Staff recommends adding the buffer standards to this section as Section 1060.070, Subd. 2.J.1. The main topics of discussion at the previous Council work session were: • Ownership of the buffer yard • Basis for the buffer requirements (land use vs. zoning) • Buffer yard standards • Permitted uses within the buffer yard. Ownership The Council decided that they prefer flexibility in the ownership of the buffer yard. The draft ordinance allows the ownership to stay in the hands of the original developer or be transferred to a third party as long as maintenance of the buffer yard is maintained by a restrictive easement and covenants. The ordinance would allow the buffer to be a separate outlot or an easement over the affected parcels. Basis for Buffer Yard The Council directed staff to use zoning districts rather than the land use designation to determine the buffer yard requirements. A “Determination of Buffering Level” table was created in the draft ordinance, which pairs the zoning of the proposed development with the zoning of the existing adjacent neighborhood to determine the buffer yard requirement. It also identifies the level of buffering required, which is classified into four buffer yard classes. This is similar to the buffer yard ordinances in Medina, Ramsey and Rochester. Staff notes that using the zoning district rather than the underlying land use designation does create some challenges when adjacent to the Urban Reserve (UR) district, which was created to “provide a holding zone until a landowner/developer makes application for development, at which time the City may rezone the affected property consistent with its designation in the Comprehensive Plan.” Under the draft ordinance, a single family development proposed in the RSF-2 district would be required to provide an “A” level buffer for the UR property regardless of the underlying land use. The UR land could be over a commercial land use or a residential land use designation. • What level of buffering should be required for developments adjacent to the UR district? • Should some consideration be given to the future land use or should it be treated as the current land use, which is likely large lot residential or agricultural use? Page 4 of 5 • Is a buffer required between RR and UR which are essentially the same use? The draft currently requires an “A” buffer between a new RR subdivision and a UR parcel. Is that necessary? The PI (Public Institutional) district currently has a relatively high buffering requirement because of the traffic and noise from schools and churches where buffering would be desirable. Cemeteries are also allowed within the PI district but do not produce the same impacts as schools and churches. • Does the Council want to exempt cemeteries from the buffering that would be required in the PI district? The ordinance does not require buffer yards adjacent to outlots or parcels that are unbuildable (because they are outlots for stormwater or some other permanent restriction). How would the buffer requirements apply to existing uses that expand the use or further subdivide the property? The buffer yard ordinance in Rochester details the circumstances in which developments that increase in size or intensity of use are required to increase the width of their buffer yard or the number of plantings within. • Should existing developments be required to add buffer yards when they subdivide or expand? For example, should Hope Church and cemetery be required to add a buffer on their existing west property line or only on the perimeter where new development is proposed? Buffer Yard Standards The Council expressed a desire to provide options for developers to use to meet the intended buffer in each class. Developers are allowed different combinations of buffer yard width, overstory trees, understory trees, shrubs and a berm or fence. The “Buffer Yard Options” table in the draft ordinance provides the permitted combinations. Developers are also given the option to use natural features such as existing topographical features, water bodies and major roadways in place of some of the buffer yard requirements. The draft ordinance gives the City Council discretion on whether or not these features will qualify. The draft ordinance does not currently allow the width of local roadways to count towards what is required for the buffer yard. However, staff notes that a local street does provide separation from the new use and adjacent uses. • Should some credit be given for the local street? Additionally, the Council asked staff to include a provision that all new developments to use the rear yard setback as the minimum perimeter setback requirement. The draft language includes language that exempts parcels within a development from the buffer requirement. If a developer proposes a project with new single family homes Page 5 of 5 adjacent to new townhomes in the project, no buffer yard would be required. The buffer yard is required only on the perimeter of the site. Permitted Uses In order to maintain the natural look of buffer yards, Council recommended that the permitted uses will be restricted to temporary structures such as benches. Recreational structures, raised bed gardens, storage sheds and stormwater ponds are not permitted. Example To demonstrate what the application of the draft ordinance may look like, we have included an exhibit (Attachment 3). This illustrates how the Hope Community Church development concept plan would need to be revised to allow for the required buffer yards along the north and west edges of the development (the east and west perimeter abuts major roadways and is exempt from the buffer ordinance, but subject to the larger major roadway setbacks). 5. Requested Action Provide feedback for staff on the draft revisions to Section 1060.070 of the City Code. If the Council supports the language in the draft ordinance, they should direct staff to schedule a public hearing at the Planning Commission. This could be scheduled for a public hearing at the April 6th Planning Commission and City Council action on April 27th. Attachments 1. Draft Revisions to Section 1060.070 dated February 8, 2023 2. City of Ramsey Buffer Yard Easement 3. Hope Community Church concept plan with required buffer yards Section 1060 (Performance Standards) Page 1 February 24, 2022 1060.070 – LANDSCAPING Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide for a diversity of landscaping plant materials and design elements within the City through the establishment of minimum standards for landscape plans and maintenance requirements for required landscaping. Subd. 2. Required Landscaping and Maintenance. Prior to approval of a building permit, all semi-public, non-residence uses, and residential developments of four units or more, shall be subject to a mandatory landscape plan and specification requirements. Residential developments of less than 4 units shall not require a landscape plan but shall be required to install a minimum number of trees as outlined in this Section, item G. A. The landscape plan shall be developed with an emphasis upon the boundary or perimeter of the proposed site at points adjoining other property and the immediate perimeter of the structure. B. Required Ground Cover. The lot area remaining after providing for off- street parking, off-street loading, sidewalks, driveways, building site and/or other requirements shall be sodded or seeded and mulched within 30 days of building occupancy or a financial guarantee shall be provided to guarantee said installation. C. Required Plantings. In addition to required ground cover specified in Subd. 2(B) above and exclusive of required buffering or screening, all new development shall be landscaped using ornamental grass, shrubs, trees or other acceptable vegetation or treatment generally used in landscaping within one year following the date of building occupancy. Where landscaping is required as part of City approvals, any plant material that is diseased or dies shall be replaced with a like kind of the original size. No landscaped area shall be used for the parking of vehicles or for the storage or display of materials, supplies or merchandise, unless specifically approved by the City. D. Minimum Size Requirements. All plants must at least equal the following minimum size: Section 1060 (Performance Standards) Page 2 February 24, 2022 Table 1 – Minimum Plant Size Requirements Potted/Bare Root or Balled and Burlapped Shade Trees (overstory) 2.5-inch diameter Ornamental Trees (understory) 1.5-inch diameter Evergreen Trees (overstory) 4-6 feet high Tall Shrubs and Hedge Material (deciduous or coniferous) 3-4 feet high Low Shrubs (deciduous) 5 gallon E. Spacing. Plant material centers shall not be located closer than 3 feet from the fence line or property line and shall not be planted to conflict with public plantings based on the judgment of the City staff. F. Types of Plantings. The landscape plan shall be reviewed by City staff to ensure that appropriate plant materials are used to accomplish the intent of the landscaping, including screening where required. G. Number of TreesPlantings. The minimum number of trees plantings on any given site shall be as follows: 1. Residential uses shall provide a minimum of one overstory tree per dwelling unit. 2. Non-Residential Uses. Non-residential uses shall contain at a minimum: a. One overstory tree per 1,000 square feet of gross building floor area or one tree per 50 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. b. One understory shrub for each 300 square feet of building or one tree per 30 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. 3. Understory Trees. Up to 50 percent of the required number of overstory trees may be substituted with the use of understory trees in combination with other design elements. In such cases, not less than 3 understory trees shall be provided for each one required overstory tree substituted. 4. At the sole discretion of the City, a portion of the total number of required trees for any development may be planted at a public location when it is determined by the City that site constraints or existing vegetation limit the ability to plant on site. Cash fees based on the estimated cost of materials and installation of required Section 1060 (Performance Standards) Page 3 February 24, 2022 materials may be substituted for public location planting at the discretion of the City. 5. No more than 33 percent of the required number of trees shall be of one species. H. Irrigation. Underground irrigation shall be required on all new multi- family and non-residential development where municipal water is available. I. Landscape Guarantee. All new plants shall be guaranteed for 2 full years from the time planting has been completed. All plants shall be alive and in satisfactory growth at the end of the guarantee period or be replaced per the approved plan. Security in the form of letter of credit or cash shall be provided to guarantee the installation per the approved plan. J. Required Screening and Buffering. 1. Buffer Yards. a. Definition. For the purpose of this Section, a buffer yard shall be a land area containing landscaping, berms, fences, or some combination thereof used to promote orderly transition between developments and to minimize the adverse impacts of differing land uses. Buffer yards shall be preserved in perpetuity by an easement or an outlot. b. Required Buffer Yard. A buffer yard shall be required when a developing property is adjacent to or across a local street from property in a less intensive zoning district. i. The buffer yard standards only apply to the parcels abutting the conflicting zoning district. ii. Parcels within the same development are not required to adhere to the buffer yard requirements. The buffer yard requirement applies only to the perimeter of the development. iii. A buffer yard shall not be required for new developments adjacent to or across a local street from a permanently undevelopable parcel, such as an outlot for stormwater ponds, but shall be required adjacent to outlots that may be developed in the future. Section 1060 (Performance Standards) Page 4 February 24, 2022 c. Responsibility. Provision of buffer yards shall be the responsibility of the more intensive use and shall be required at the time of development. d. Location of Buffer Yard. Buffer yards, when required, shall be located on the outer perimeter of a lot or parcel, extending to the lot or parcel boundary line. i. Buffer yards shall not be located on any portion of an existing or dedicated public right-of-way or private street easement, unless otherwise specified by this ordinance. ii. Buffer yards may be located within required yard setbacks. Structures must comply with both the setbacks in the zoning district and the buffer yard requirements. e. Determination of Buffering Level. This subsection applies to proposed developments that are adjacent to an existing residential neighborhood. Matching the development to the adjacent existing neighborhood in the following chart determines the level of buffering required. i. If the proposed development is in a PUD zoning district, the underlying zoning district used to establish the PUD shall be used to determine the buffering level. ii. A buffer level of “X” denotes a buffer yard is not required. iii. Perimeter Setback. For a buffer yard requirement noted with an asterisk (*) in Table 2, the development is required to maintain side and rear setbacks equivalent to the rear setback requirement. No additional buffer plantings are required in the setback. Table 2 – Determination of Buffering Level Proposed Development Zoning District UR RR RSF-1 RSF-2 RSF-3 RMF1 MP TCR PI C2 BP, I-1 Zoning of Existing Neighborhood UR * X A A B C C D D D D RR X * A A B C C D D D D RSF-1 X X * A A B B C C C D RSF-2 X X X * A B B C C C D RSF-3 X X X X * A B B B B C RMF1 X X X X X * A B B B C MP X X X X X X * B B B B 1 Zoning district RMF includes RMF-1, RMF-2, and RMF-3 2 Zoning district C includes DMU, GMU, CR, C-1, and C-2 Section 1060 (Performance Standards) Page 5 February 24, 2022 f. Options for Buffer Yard Classes. The following table is used to list appropriate landscape buffer options to fulfill the requirements of the buffer yard classes in Table 2 of this Section. Proposed alternatives must be approved by City Council. Table 3 – Buffer Yard Options Buffer Yard Class Width Overstory Plantings1 Understory Plantings1 Shrubs1 Structures2 A 10 feet 1 2 0 None 15 feet 1 1.5 0 None 20 feet 0.5 1.25 0 None B 10 feet 1 4 6 Minimum 4-foot fence 20 feet 3 6 9 None 20 feet 1 2 3 Minimum 4-foot fence 30 feet 2 4 12 None 30 feet 1 2 4 Minimum 4-foot berm C 20 feet 3 3 12 Minimum 4-foot fence 30 feet 2 2 9 Minimum 4-foot fence 30 feet 4 6 24 None 40 feet 3 4 18 None 40 feet 2 2 12 Minimum 4-foot berm D 30 feet 6 9 36 Minimum 6-foot fence 40 feet 4 6 24 Minimum 6-foot fence 40 feet 8 12 24 None 50 feet 6 9 18 None 50 feet 3 4 9 Minimum 6-foot berm 1 per 100 feet of distance 2 Fences are subject to requirements in Section 1060.080 g. Planting Requirements. All plantings shall be subject to the size and spacing requirements in Subd. 2(D) and 2(E) of this Section. h. Natural Buffers. Any of the following buffers may qualify as an acceptable method of attainment for transitioning (in whole or in part) if deemed acceptable by City Council: i. Existing topographical features on vacant lands such as hills and swales; ii. Wetlands, lakes, rivers and streams; iii. Major Roadways. Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Section 1060 (Performance Standards) Page 6 February 24, 2022 Roadways as shown on the 2040 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. iv. Existing wooded areas. i. Use of buffer yards. Buffer yards shall be left in a predominantly undeveloped state. i. Plantings in addition to those required by this ordinance are permitted. ii. No passive recreation, paths, storage containers, lighting fixtures, raised planting beds or any permanent structures shall be allowed. iii. Temporary structures such as benches shall be allowed. iv. Paving shall be limited to areas necessary to provide access to the subject property. v. Stormwater ponds and bio-retention ponds are allowed in perimeter setbacks. They are not allowed to encroach a maximum of 10 feet into required buffer yards. j. Ownership of Buffer Yards. Ownership of the buffer yard will vary depending on whether it is an outlot or an easement. i. Buffer yards shall remain in the ownership of the original developer, or they shall be transferred to any consenting grantees, such as adjoining landowners, a homeowners association, or an open-space or conservation group, subject to City approval. ii. Any such conveyance must adequately guarantees the protection and maintenance of the buffer yard for its intended purpose in perpetuity. a.iii. Easements protecting the buffer shall be recorded against the property and filed at Hennepin County. 2. Screening with the use of landscaping, fencing and walls should be accomplished with the existing topography where possible. When the existing topography prohibits effective screening, berming may be used. Section 1060 (Performance Standards) Page 7 February 24, 2022 a. Planting screens are the preferred method of screening. The planting screen shall consist of hardy trees that will provide a minimum of 80 percent opacity year-round. Planting screens shall contain a mix of overstory and understory plantings and a mix of deciduous and coniferous materials. b. Fences or walls may be used in conjunction with landscaping to provide screening. When required for screening, minimum of 80 percent opacity shall be provided. No landscaping or screening shall interfere with driver or pedestrian visibility for vehicles entering or exiting the premises. c. Earth berms may be used for screening when topography requires the earth berm to adequately screen the property. Berms shall not exceed 3:1 slope. 3. Parking areas with 4 or more stalls shall be screened from properties guided or zoned residential and from public streets. Screening to a height of at least 3 feet shall be provided to screen vehicle headlights. 4. Loading and service areas shall be screened from properties guided or zoned residential and from public streets. K. Building Setback Flexibility through Additional Landscaping. A reduction in the required front setback adjacent to arterial streets may be approved by the City Council if the applicant provides landscaping beyond the minimum requirements or preserves significant landscaping in this area. The required setback may be reduced up to 40 percent if the applicant provides a minimum of one overstory deciduous tree, one overstory coniferous tree, 2 ornamental trees and 10 understory shrubs per 100 feet of the length of the property line where the flexibility is requested, or preserves the equivalent amount of existing trees and shrubs. These materials must be provided in addition to the minimum landscape requirements. L. Parking Setback Flexibility through Additional Landscaping. A reduction in the required front setback adjacent to arterial streets may be approved by the City Council if the applicant provides landscaping beyond the minimum requirements or preserves significant landscaping in this area. The required setback may be reduced to the required front setback from other streets in that district if the applicant provides a minimum of one overstory deciduous tree, one overstory coniferous tree, 2 ornamental trees and 10 understory shrubs per 100 feet of the length of the property line where the flexibility is requested, or preserves the equivalent amount of existing trees and shrubs. These materials must be provided in addition to the minimum landscape requirements. URBAN RESER V E URBAN RESERVE URBAN RESERVEBUSINESS DISTRICTGENERAL MIXED USE RSF-1URBAN RESERVEURBAN RESERVERMF-2 FILTRATION PO N D POND PONDFILTRATION POND BUFFER CLASS C: 20- TO 40-FOOT BUFFER shown here as 30 feet BUFFER CLASS D: 30- TO 50-FOOT BUFFER shown here as 40 feet GMU GMU PI FUTURE CEMETERY POND FILTRATION POND EXISTING WETLAND 14 DOWNTOWN UTILITY PROJECT STATUS (updated 2/14/2023) Owner/DBA PID Address Status Stanchion Bar 26‐119‐23‐11‐0007 20037 County Road 10 Connected to water only MAHANT LLC ‐ Crossroads 26‐119‐23‐11‐0013 7625 County Road 116 Not Connected Global Knits 26‐119‐23‐12‐0012 20110 Auger Ave. Not Connected Phil's Auto 26‐119‐23‐11‐0029 7590 Commerce St. Not Connected Heidi's Grow Haus 26‐119‐23‐11‐0041 7555 County Road 116 Not Connected Cavana Real Estate Holdings LLC 26‐119‐23‐14‐0025 7525 Commerce St. Not Connected Sunram Construction 26‐119‐23‐14‐0024 20010 75th Ave. Permit Active STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 9b. Council Meeting: Prepared By: Topic: Action Required: Summary: Financial/Budget: Options: Page 2 Recommendation: Council Action: Attachments: HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE DRAINAGE FEASIBILITY STUDY February 14, 2023 Prepared for: City of Corcoran Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. One Carlson Parkway, Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55447 Project Number: 227704908 Project Number: 227704908 i Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 1 2 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ................................................................................ 2 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................. 3 4 ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 4 5 RESULTS AND ESTIMATED COST ............................................................................ 6 6 PERMITTING AND EASEMENTS ................................................................................ 7 7 FINANCING .................................................................................................................. 8 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 9 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 PIPE SUMMARY FOR IMPROVEMENT SCENARIO #1: 5-YEAR EVENT TABLE 2 PIPE SUMMARY FOR IMPROVEMENT SCENARIO #2: 10-YEAR EVENT TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS TABLE 4 COST ESTIMATE FOR SCENARIO #1—5-YEAR EVENT TABLE 5 COST ESTIMATE FOR SCENARIO #2—10-YEAR EVENT LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 OVERALL STUDY AREA FIGURE 2 MAJOR SUBWATERSHEDS FIGURE 3 SUBWATERSHEDS WITH CULVERT IMPROVEMENTS APPENDIX APPENDIX A HYDROCAD DIAGRAM AND SUMMARY MODEL RESULTS Drainage Feasibility Study 1 Executive Summary Project Number: 227704908 1 1 Executive Summary The City authorized Stantec to provide a feasibility study summarizing a modeling analysis for improving drainage within the southern portion of the Horseshoe Bend neighborhood that drains northeast towards Rolling Hills Road and a significant wetland complex. The neighborhood ditch and driveway culvert system does not convey runoff to current standards and results in driveway overtopping, road overtopping and low yards which remain wet for long periods of time. The overall drainage area is 76 acres (Figure 1) and a recent approval (Garages Too) resulted in development on 5.2 acres within the upper watershed along Horseshoe Bend Drive. The development was required by the City and watershed approvals to maintain proposed flow rates equivalent to existing rates which was accomplished by ponding for the additional 2.9 acres of new impervious. A guideline for City drainage of new construction is to convey the 10-year storm event of 4.3 inches, therefore this study initially analyzed how conveyance could be achieved for that event. Currently driveways overtop at 1-year event (or less) as reported by residents. However, as the analysis was developed the cost associated with a 10-year event triggered a review of smaller events to investigate other scenarios for presenting a more value based alternative for improvements. Results show that the driveways and public streets could be improved as follows: Existing · Model results show most of the driveways overtop at the 2-year event. Improvement Scenarios · Four driveway culverts, two City road crossings and ditches could be improved to manage the 5- year event (3.6 inches) at a City project cost of approximately $190,000. · Four driveway culverts, two City road crossings and ditches could be improved to manage the 10- year event (4.3 inches) at a City project cost of approximately $231,000. · Other culverts under Rolling Hills Road are not proposed to be upsized for capacity but are recommended to be replaced if a project is implemented. Cost is $37,000. These are aging steel culverts that could be replaced if doing a project in the area. · The large wetland shows only a minor effect from either improvement scenario and an expansion of the project to include a new wetland outlet on private property would not provide benefit commensurate with the increased project complexity and cost. This report completes the feasibility-level modeling and if a project is conducted additional refinement of the model, permitting and conveyance design will be performed to obtain the wetland and watershed approvals. A wetland review shows the permitting would be straightforward. Drainage Feasibility Study 2 Introduction and Purpose Project Number: 227704908 2 2 Introduction and Purpose The study reviewed existing hydrologic and hydraulic conditions, incorporated resident’s historical knowledge and identified improvement options to the overall conveyance systems along with preliminary costs. The study area is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to investigate improvements to manage the 10-year storm event within the ditch/culvert system, however also explored other options since the 10-year may be costly and other storm events were analyzed for value-based decision making. Downstream impacts were reviewed since increased culvert and ditch capacity along Horseshoe Bend would also increase flows along Rolling Hills Road. This feasibility study outlines existing conditions, alternatives, and estimated costs of a project. Further refinement of the design would occur if the project moves forward. Figures included are the overall Study Area (Figure 1), Major Subwatersheds (Figure 2) and Subwatersheds with Culvert Improvements (Figure 3). Drainage Feasibility Study 3 Existing Conditions Project Number: 227704908 3 3 Existing Conditions The total drainage area included in the study is 76 acres (Figure 1) and the road system outlets into a large wetland on the east side of Rolling Hills Road. The current land use of the total watershed drainage area consists of rural residential with minor acreage in crops and wetlands. The drainage area consists of four major subwatersheds (Figure 2) and while the proposed drainage improvements are only in the southern portion of the watershed, the entire watershed was modeled to understand how changes impact the system. · North Drainage Area – 8.1 acres from the northeast and northwest intersection of Horseshoe Trail and Rolling Hills Road drain to the south. There are two culverts that direct runoff in the ditches from the north side of Horseshoe Trail to the south. A 12” culvert is on the west side of Rolling Hills Road and a 24” pipe is on the east side of Rolling Hills Road. · West Drainage Area- 23.4 acres drains east from the yards of residential properties on Horseshoe Bend Drive to the low areas on the west side of Rolling Hills Road by passing through a series of driveway culverts before draining east through culverts into the large wetland. An 18” CMP pipe located between 6409 and 6405 Rolling Hills Road discharges the northern flows to the east wetland. Incoming flows from the crossing south of Horseshoe Bend Dr. flow to the north of 6300 Horseshoe Bend Dr. underneath an existing 15” CMP under the north driveway. These flows join with the north flows at 6405 Rolling Hills Road yard where two 15” CMP’s are located. Both CMP’s flow underneath Rolling Hills Road to the west edge of the wetland. · Southwest Drainage Area – 15.1 acres of drainage (including the Garages Too development) drains along the south ditch of Horseshoe Bend Drive. The feasibility study uses proposed conditions; however, the flow rates match existing conditions per WMO and City requirements. Ditch and overland flows join at the driveway of 6315 Horseshoe Bend before being conveyed through a series of driveway culverts that typically vary between 15” and 18” in size and are of varying condition. Drainage overtops Horseshoe Bend Drive along with the driveways during the 10-year event. Ponding occurs at the southwest corner of Rolling Hills Road and Horseshoe Bend Drive in a low yard where two 18” CMP crossings are located. These two pipes split the direction of flow, one CMP conveys flow to the north side of Horseshoe Bend Drive and the other to the east side of Rolling Hills Road (East Drainage Area). · East Drainage Area – 29.5 acres drain into the large wetland (Subwatershed 10S, Figure 3) located east of Rolling Hills Road. The East Wetland is approximately 10 acres in size and has significant storage and the outlet is an 18” RCP pipe beneath a field crossing that conveys water into a ditch. Additional flow into 10S is direct through ditches from the north (Subwatersheds 19S and 20S) and south (Subwatershed 11S). The wetlands in 10S and 11S are connected via driveway culverts and after events act as one storage area. Drainage Feasibility Study 4 Analysis Project Number: 227704908 4 4 Analysis This feasibility study focused on the neighborhood drainage route receiving additional volume from development, and any impacts of increasing driveway capacities throughout the drainageway. The analysis analyzed the 1, 2, 5 and 10-year storm event to better understand the value of improvements. Older development driveway culverts were typically not designed based on specific modeling to convey design storm events. Inadequate existing pipes and ditch conveyance systems have caused runoff to overtop Horseshoe Bend Drive well below the 10-year storm event. Additionally, water collects at the intersection of Horseshoe Bend Drive and Rolling Hills Road causing additional undesired drainage issues. This section outlines the methodology and modeling results for upsizing current pipes in the ditch while also reducing peak 10-year High Water Levels (HWL’s) in low lying areas. See Figure 3, for drainage areas and crossing information. The following information was provided as a part of the Garages Too Development: · Existing and Proposed HydroCAD Model submitted 10/17/2022, by Civil Engineering Site Design. · Survey information submitted 10/19/2021, by Civil Engineering Site Design. Stantec received a HydroCAD Model and survey information from Civil Engineering Site Design for the south side of Horseshoe Bend and the west side of Rolling Hills Road as a part of the Garages Too Development. This development was approved in 2022 with construction in 2023. Stantec used this model as a basis and expanded the model using additional survey information. Stantec verified the delineated drainage areas and culvert information. The following models were created to assess the impacts of upsizing and addition of culverts along the south side of Horseshoe Bend Drive and the West side of Rolling Hills Road. · Improvement Scenario #1: System Improved for the 5-Year event. This model replaced pipes at the following nodes: 3P, 4P, 5P, 6P, 7P (Horseshoe Bend North/South), and 8P Rolling Hills Road (Table 1). Removal of the existing driveway culverts and replacement with new culverts increases the capacity of the system to convey the 5-year without overtopping. Due to cover concerns, multiple pipes are anticipated to be used instead of larger culverts. The additional culvert included for 8P will cross Rolling Hills Road to the east and will not follow the existing flow path under the driveway to the north. Some pipe inverts were lowered from existing conditions to account for ditch regrading. Lowering the culvert inverts maximizes flow in the culverts to assist with reducing overtopping of driveways. Drainage Feasibility Study 4 Analysis Project Number: 227704908 5 Table 1. Pipe Summary for Improvement Scenario #1: 5-Year Event · Improvement Scenario #2: System Improved for the 10-Year event. This analysis used new pipes at the following nodes: 3P, 4P, 5P, 6P, 7P (North/South), and 8P (Rolling Hills Road). Removal of the existing driveway culverts and replacement with new culverts increases the capacity of the system to convey the 10-year without overtopping. Due to cover concerns, multiple pipes are anticipated to be used instead of larger culverts. The additional culverts included for 8P will cross Rolling Hills Road to the east and will not follow the normal flow path under the driveway to the north. Some pipe inverts were lowered from existing conditions to account for ditch regrading. Lowering the culvert inverts maximizes flow in the culverts to assist with reducing overtopping of driveways. Table 2. Pipe Summary for Improvement Scenario #2: 10-Year Event Drainage Feasibility Study 5 Results and Estimated Cost Project Number: 227704908 6 5 Results and Estimated Cost Results for the different analysis shows that the Horseshoe Bend and Rolling Hills Road system is undersized to convey the 10-year storm event. Actual events will have different intensities and durations, however the modeling provides a reasonable engineering design standard for review. The culvert conditions, original assumptions, and design along with placement of driveways has restricted the system from performing to current municipal guidelines for public drainage. · General Model Notes The existing model shows that the Horseshoe Bend driveways overtop for the 1 year event (or less). The runoff “travel time” for drainage to the receiving wetland (10P) shows that the watershed quickly drains the 76 acres into the wetland, which is also reflected in the results of the improvement scenarios where upgrading the driveway and road culverts, etc. will have only a slight increase for Wetland 10P (0.5 inch of additional bounce). · Improvement Scenario #1: Horseshoe Bend and Rolling Hills Conveyance Increased to pass the 5-Year event. The analysis for adding new pipes to the following nodes: 3P, 4P, 5P, 6P, 7P (Horseshoe North/South), and 8P (New Rolling Hills crossing) increases the capacity of the system and reduces overtopping. Results show improvement to all four driveways to pass the 5-year event without overtopping (Table 3). Elevation changes for the significant detention areas (7P, 8P and 10P) show lower elevations of 2 to 6 inches for yards in 7P and 8P and a slight increase (0.04 feet) in the large wetland 10P (see summary table of results in Appendix) The improvement in 7P (2 inches) is due to improving the hydraulic grade line with the new pipe and 8P has lower peak elevation (6 inches) due to benefits from the new pipe crossing under Rolling Hills Road. Upgrading the City culverts would eliminate overtopping for the 5-year event. A negligible increase is seen in the downstream wetland. Cost for this improvement was estimated at approximately $190,000 (Table 4). · Improvement Scenario #2: Horseshoe Bend and Rolling Hills Conveyance Increased to pass the 10-Year event. The analysis for adding new pipes to the following nodes: 3P, 4P, 5P, 6P, 7P (Horseshoe North/South), and 8P (New Rolling Hills crossing) again increases the capacity and reduces overtopping. Results show eliminating overtopping for the complete system (Table 3). Elevation changes for the significant detention areas (7P, 8P and 10P) show lower elevations for the yard at 8P however 7P is similar to existing conditions due to increased flow from upstream driveways. Similar to Scenario #1, a slight increase (0.04 feet) occurs in the large Drainage Feasibility Study 6 Permitting and Easements Project Number: 227704908 7 wetland 10P (See Appendix A). The improvement in 8P is from the new crossing under Rolling Hills Road. Upgrading the City culverts would eliminate overtopping for the 10-year event. A negligible increase is seen in the downstream wetland, presumably due to modeling variance. Cost for this improvement was estimated at $231,000 (Table 5). This report analyzed capacity to improve conveyance by replacing culverts and flow restrictions. If Council wishes to proceed with a project a final design will need to be completed which will review driveway impacts, ditch grading, additional conveyance easements, yard impacts and final design components. 6 Permitting and Easements Permitting would involve wetland delineations to review impacts from pipe crossings and ditch work. The City serves as the LGU and the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) would be involved in the approval. The City may also choose to obtain a No Loss for wetland 10P. Temporary construction easements may be necessary for ditch grading and potential driveway tie-ins which may require significant resident coordination. Small utility impacts would be anticipated with this project due to the ditch regrading and culvert replacements which would be identified and coordinated with the final design and schedule. Drainage Feasibility Study 7 Financing Project Number: 227704908 8 7 Financing Financing for the majority of the project would be through bonding and general levy funds if necessary (no stormwater City utility exists). · Maintenance or other funds may be used for the Alternate costs shown on Table 4 and 5 since these are aged culverts to be replaced in-kind. · Contingency is shown in cost estimates for easements, utility conflicts or other unforeseen project changes. · Tables 4 and 5 reflect project costs, and include improvements at the resident driveway shown as Node 3P. Those actual costs are anticipated to be responsibility of the development since it was included in the conditions for the Garages Too development. Drainage Feasibility Study 8 Conclusions and Recommendations Project Number: 227704908 9 8 Conclusions and Recommendations In conclusion, Stantec investigated drainage improvements along the south side of Horseshoe Bend to alleviate road/driveway overtopping and low yards that remain wet for extended periods. Residents in this area are seeing road and driveway overtopping for rainfall events less than two inches. This is somewhat typical of older neighborhood driveway culverts that were installed on a nominal size (12 or 15 inch) and therefore not designed for the upstream drainage. Permitting was reviewed with our wetland specialists and is considered feasible for WCA impacts and there are no FEMA regulated floodplain. Preliminary design in this feasibility study focused on adding culvert capacity at each driveway to convey a 5 or 10- year event. Pipe sizes may change based on a final ditch/yard impact design and this would be reviewed in final design and permitting. Conclusions include: · Results show it is feasible to improve the system for either the 5-year or 10-events without a significant impact to the receiving wetland (10P). · Wetland permitting would be for temporary impacts and possibly a No Loss for Wetland 10P. · Water attenuation in low yards can be expected to be similar to existing conditions although some improvement may occur as final grading and culvert inverts improve conveyance. · Preliminary results indicate that drainage alternatives for the 5-year and 10-year scenarios will not adversely impact the large downstream wetland (10P) on private property east of Rolling Hills Road. If it is desired to review an upsize to the wetland (10P) outlet, it will increase the complexity and cost of the project. · Resident communication will be significant for either the 5-year or 10-year improvement project. Engineering recommendations are: If financially feasible: · Review the information presented and whether a project should be conducted. If so, the 5-year event improvement since balances value and improvement impact for the drainage system. If not financially feasible: · Consider directing staff towards initiating a project list that identifies known areas of historical issues and could be implemented when funds are identified or other City projects are performed, such as a full road reconstruction. A project list would include “ballpark” costs for existing drainage issues and could allow for budgeting for improvements. Currently the list is in rough draft form with the ongoing discussion on the implementation of a Stormwater Area Charge. Drainage Feasibility Study Project Number: 227704908 ADDITIONAL TABLES 3. Summary of Results 4. Improvement Scenario #1 Cost Estimate 5. Improvement Scenario #2 Cost Estimate Condition Event Horseshoe Driveways that Overtop 7P Horseshoe/Rolling Hills North Pipe Overtop for 10-Year? 10P 10-year Wetland Outlet Bounce (ft) Existing 1-Year (2.48") 4 out of 4 No N/A 1-Year (2.48") 0 out of 4 2-Year (2.86") 0 out of 4 5-Year (3.57") 0 out of 4 10-Year (4.26") 4 out of 4 1-Year (2.48") 0 out of 4 2-Year (2.86") 0 out of 4 5-Year (3.57") 0 out of 4 10-Year (4.26") 0 out of 4 See Appendix A Summary Table for detailed results No 0.04 Table 3 Summary of Results Horseshoe Bend Drive Feasibility Study Scenario #1: 5- Year Event No 0.04 Scenario #2: 10- Year Event Appendix A Model Results Table 4 Cost Estimate for Scenario #1 - 5 Year Event Horseshoe Bend Feasibility Study REMOVALS Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal 1 REMOVE CULVERT LIN FT 320 $10.00 $3,200.00 2 REMOVE STORM SEWER FLARED-END EACH 16 $100.00 $1,600.00 3 SAWING PAVEMENT LIN FT 200 $8.00 $1,600.00 4 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 250 $15.00 $3,750.00 5 SALVAGE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY SQ YD 200 $5.00 $1,000.00 6 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX AND POST EACH 5 $250.00 $1,250.00 7 CLEAR AND GRUB EACH 18 $650.00 $11,700.00 8 COMMON EXCAVATION (EST. 12" DITCH MATERIAL) CU YD 200 $15.00 $3,000.00 REMOVALS COSTS $27,100.00 EROSION CONTROL Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal 1 CULVERT PROTECTION EACH 14 $250.00 $3,500.00 2 HYDROSEED - TURF MIX SQ YD 1800 $2.00 $3,600.00 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET & SEED MIX SQ YD 750 $4.00 $3,000.00 4 SALVAGE AND RESPREAD TOPSOIL (6" ENTIRE DITCH)CU YD 250 $10.00 $2,500.00 EROSION CONTROL COSTS $12,600.00 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal 1 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 4" THICK TON 100 $150.00 $15,000.00 2 AGGREGATE BASE - CLASS 5 - 15" THICK CU YD 200 $30.00 $6,000.00 3 18-INCH DUAL WALL PP CULVERT LIN FT 143 $85.00 $12,155.00 4 18-INCH HDPE APRON EACH 10 $1,200.00 $12,000.00 5 18-INCH RCP LIN FT 44 $90.00 $3,960.00 6 18-INCH RCP APRON EACH 2 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 7 *21-INCH DUAL WALL PP CULVERT LIN FT 53 $130.00 $6,890.00 8 *21-INCH HDPE APRON EACH 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 9 21-INCH RCP LIN FT 45 $140.00 $6,300.00 10 21-INCH RCP APRON EACH 2 $1,750.00 $3,500.00 11 DRIVEWAY TRANSITION EACH 5 $500.00 $2,500.00 12 DITCH CLEANING LIN FT 1100 $10.00 $11,000.00 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS COSTS $84,805.00 Notes:*21" is not a manufactured size. 24" price was used. OTHER Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $12,000.00 $10,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 OTHER COSTS $13,000.00 SUBTOTAL $137,505.00 CONTINGENCY (15%)$20,626.00 INDIRECT PROJECT COSTS (20%)$31,627.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $189,758.00 Notes:*3P culvert to be paid for through the Garages Too development ALTERNATE A - Potential Maintenance Fund Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 3 REMOVE CULVERT LIN FT 165 $10.00 $1,650.00 4 REMOVE STORM SEWER FLARED-END EACH 6 $100.00 $600.00 5 SAWING PAVEMENT LIN FT 150 $8.00 $1,200.00 6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 200 $15.00 $3,000.00 7 CULVERT PROTECTION EACH 6 $300.00 $1,800.00 8 HYDROSEED - TURF MIX SQ YD 200 $2.00 $400.00 9 15-INCH RCP LIN FT 110 $75.00 $8,250.00 10 15-INCH RCP APRON EACH 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 11 18-INCH RCP LIN FT 55 $90.00 $4,950.00 12 18-INCH RCP APRON EACH 2 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 13 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 4" THICK TON 25 $175.00 $4,375.00 14 AGGREGATE BASE - CLASS 5 - 15" THICK CU YD 75 $30.00 $2,250.00 OTHER COSTS $36,975.00 Table 5 Cost Estimate for Scenario #2 - 10 Year Event Horseshoe Bend Feasibility Study REMOVALS Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal 1 REMOVE CULVERT LIN FT 320 $10.00 $3,200.00 2 REMOVE STORM SEWER FLARED-END LIN FT 16 $100.00 $1,600.00 3 SAWING PAVEMENT LIN FT 200 $8.00 $1,600.00 4 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 300 $15.00 $4,500.00 5 SALVAGE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY SQ YD 200 $5.00 $1,000.00 6 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX AND POST EACH 5 $250.00 $1,250.00 7 CLEAR AND GRUB EACH 18 $650.00 $11,700.00 8 COMMON EXCAVATION (EST. 12" DITCH MATERIAL) CU YD 200 $15.00 $3,000.00 REMOVALS COSTS $27,850.00 EROSION CONTROL Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal 1 CULVERT PROTECTION EACH 18 $250.00 $4,500.00 2 HYDROSEED - TURF MIX SQ YD 1800 $2.00 $3,600.00 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET & SEED MIX SQ YD 750 $4.00 $3,000.00 4 SALVAGE AND RESPREAD TOPSOIL (6" ENTIRE DITCH)CU YD 250 $10.00 $2,500.00 EROSION CONTROL COSTS $13,600.00 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal 1 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 4" THICK TON 125 $150.00 $18,750.00 2 AGGREGATE BASE - CLASS 5 - 15" THICK CU YD 300 $30.00 $9,000.00 3 18-INCH RCP LIN FT 44 $90.00 $3,960.00 4 18-INCH RCP APRON EACH 2 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 7 *21-INCH DUAL WALL PP CULVERT LIN FT 83 $130.00 $10,790.00 8 *21-INCH HDPE APRON EACH 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 9 21-INCH RCP LIN FT 90 $140.00 $12,600.00 10 21-INCH RCP APRON EACH 4 $1,750.00 $7,000.00 11 24-INCH DUAL WALL PP CULVERT LIN FT 113 $130.00 $14,690.00 12 24-INCH HDPE APRON EACH 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 13 DRIVEWAY TRANSITION EACH 5 $500.00 $2,500.00 14 DITCH CLEANING LIN FT 1100 $10.00 $11,000.00 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS COSTS $110,790.00 Notes:*21" is not a manufactured size. 24" price was used. OTHER Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 OTHER COSTS $15,000.00 SUBTOTAL $167,240.00 CONTINGENCY (15%)$25,086.00 INDIRECT PROJECT COSTS (20%)$38,466.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $230,792.00 Notes:*3P culvert to be paid for through the Garages Too development ALTERNATE A Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Subtotal 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 3 REMOVE CULVERT LIN FT 165 $10.00 $1,650.00 4 REMOVE STORM SEWER FLARED-END EACH 6 $100.00 $600.00 5 SAWING PAVEMENT LIN FT 150 $8.00 $1,200.00 6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 200 $15.00 $3,000.00 7 CULVERT PROTECTION EACH 6 $300.00 $1,800.00 8 HYDROSEED - TURF MIX SQ YD 200 $2.00 $400.00 9 15-INCH RCP LIN FT 110 $75.00 $8,250.00 10 15-INCH RCP APRON EACH 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 11 18-INCH RCP LIN FT 55 $90.00 $4,950.00 12 18-INCH RCP APRON EACH 2 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 13 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 4" THICK TON 25 $175.00 $4,375.00 14 AGGREGATE BASE - CLASS 5 - 15" THICK CU YD 75 $30.00 $2,250.00 OTHER COSTS $36,975.00 Drainage Feasibility Study Project Number: 227704908 FIGURES 1. Study Area 2. Major Subwatersheds 3. Subwatersheds with Culvert Improvements CorcoranHorseshoeBendDr H ors e s h o e B e n dDr RollingHillsRdH o r s e s h o e T r l HorseshoeBendDrRollingHillsRdH ors e s h o e B endDr H o r s e s ho e T r l Watershed 76 Ac. Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title "($$¯V:\2277\active\227704908\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\topographic_map\topographic_map.aprx Revised: 2022-07-21 By: jshuckLegend Watersheds Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Aerial Photograph (At original document size of 11x17) 1:3,000 0 250 500 Feet Prepared by JCS on 2022-07-21 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 227704908 City of Corcoran Study Area 1 HorseshoeBendDrRollingHillsRdH ors e s h o e B e n dDr RollingHillsRdHorseshoeBendDrH o r s e s h o e T r l RollingHillsRdH ors e s h o e B endDr H o r s e s ho e T r l ,,,,,,,,,,,,Southwest Drainage Area 15.1 Ac. North Drainage Area 8.1 Ac. East Drainage Area 29.5 Ac.West Drainage Area 23.4 Ac. Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title"($$¯V:\2277\active\227704908\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\topographic_map\topographic_map.aprx Revised: 2022-11-10 By: eosterdykLegend Watersheds East Drainage Area North Drainage Area Southwest Drainage Area West Drainage Area Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Aerial Photograph (At original document size of 11x17) 1:3,000 0 250 500 Feet Prepared by JCS on 2022-11-10 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 227704908 City of Corcoran Major Subwatersheds 2 HorseshoeBendDrH ors e s h o e B e n dDr RollingHillsRdHorseshoeBendDrH o r s e s ho e T r l RollingHillsRdH ors e s h o e B endDr RollingHillsRdH o r s e s ho e T r l 2 - Existing 15" CMPs to remain East Wetland Outlet Existing 18" RCP to remain Existing 18" CMP to remain Horseshoe Bend Crossing 6315 Horseshoe Bend 6311 Horseshoe Bend 6307 Horseshoe Bend 6301 Horseshoe Bend New Rolling Hills Crossing ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,3S 9.1 Ac. 16S 7 Ac. 19S 5.2 Ac. 20S 11.1 Ac. 17S 2 Ac. 18S 0.8 Ac. 14S 4.2 Ac. 15S 0.9 Ac. 10S 12.9 Ac. 11S 5.4 Ac. 12S 0.9 Ac. 13S 1.7 Ac. 9S 2.1 Ac. 8S 6.7 Ac. 4S 1.7 Ac. 7S 1.2 Ac. 6S 2.2 Ac. 5S 0.8 Ac. Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. Client/Project Figure No. Project Location Title"($$¯V:\2277\active\227704908\03_data\gis_cad\gis\pro\topographic_map\topographic_map.aprx Revised: 2023-02-14 By: eosterdykLegend ,,Proposed Culverts ,,Existing Culverts Watersheds Page 1 of 1 Notes 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N 2. Data Sources: Hennepin County 3. Background: Hennepin County 2020 Aerial Photograph (At original document size of 11x17) 1:3,095 0 250 500 Feet Prepared by JCS on 2023-02-14 Corcoran, Hennepin Co., MN 227704908 City of Corcoran Subwatersheds with Culvert Improvements 3 Feasibility Study Project Number: 227704908 APPENDIX A HydroCAD Diagram and Model Results Condition Storm Event HWL (ft) Overtopping? HWL (ft) Overtopping? HWL (ft) Overtopping? HWL (ft) Overtopping? HWL (ft) Overtopping? HWL (ft) Overtopping? HWL (ft) Overtopping? HWL (ft) Overtopping? HWL (ft) Overtopping? 1-Year (2.48") 1007.84 YES 996.83 YES 989.97 YES 988.27 YES 985.13 NO 979.95 NO 978.16 NO 974.86 NO 979.22 NO 2-Year (2.86") 1007.89 YES 996.88 YES 990.07 YES 988.38 YES 985.61 NO 980.17 YES 978.77 NO 975.15 NO 979.42 NO 5-Year (3.57") 1007.96 YES 996.97 YES 990.19 YES 988.52 YES 986.64 NO 980.35 YES 979.93 NO 975.66 NO 979.77 NO 10-Year (4.26") 1008.03 YES 997.04 YES 990.29 YES 988.62 YES 987.30 NO 980.55 YES 980.46 YES 976.14 NO 980.15 YES 1-Year (2.48") 1005.64 NO 994.32 NO 988.52 NO 987.11 NO 985.03 NO 979.26 NO 978.01 NO 974.92 NO 978.90 NO 2-Year (2.86") 1006.00 NO 994.75 NO 988.75 NO 987.44 NO 985.45 NO 979.45 NO 978.52 NO 975.20 NO 979.12 NO 5-Year (3.57") 1007.05 NO 995.92 NO 989.39 NO 988.12 NO 986.47 NO 979.88 NO 979.42 NO 975.70 NO 979.51 NO 10-Year (4.26") 1007.87 YES 996.80 YES 989.98 YES 988.40 YES 987.16 NO 980.33 YES 980.24 NO 976.18 NO 979.92 NO 1-Year (2.48") 1005.53 NO 994.19 NO 988.44 NO 986.91 NO 985.04 NO 978.92 NO 977.93 NO 974.92 NO 978.90 NO 2-Year (2.86") 1005.75 NO 994.44 NO 988.61 NO 987.10 NO 985.57 NO 979.06 NO 978.45 NO 975.20 NO 979.11 NO 5-Year (3.57") 1006.31 NO 995.14 NO 988.97 NO 987.47 NO 986.67 NO 979.38 NO 979.31 NO 975.70 NO 979.51 NO 10-Year (4.26") 1007.13 NO 996.10 NO 989.46 NO 988.01 NO 987.32 NO 979.81 NO 980.02 NO 976.18 NO 979.92 NO HydroCAD Node Condition Storm Event HWL (ft) Change from Existing (ft) HWL (ft) Change from Existing (ft) HWL (ft) Change from Existing (ft) 5-Year 986.64 980.35 975.66 10-Year 987.30 980.55 976.14 5-Year 986.47 -0.17 979.88 -0.47 975.70 0.04 10-Year 987.16 -0.14 980.33 -0.22 976.18 0.04 5-Year 986.67 0.03 979.38 -0.97 975.70 0.04 10-Year 987.32 0.02 979.81 -0.74 976.18 0.04 Summary of Results Appendix A Storage Node High Water Level Comparison Existing Scenario #1: 5-Year Event N/A N/AN/A 7P Horseshoe Bend 8P Rolling Hills 10P - Wetland Elevation Results HydroCAD Node 3P 4P 5P 11P Description 6315 Horseshoe Bend 6311 Horseshoe Bend 6307 Horseshoe Bend 6301 Horseshoe Bend Horseshoe Bend Drive 6P 7P 8P 9P 10P 980.26 976.20 980.10 Rolling Hills Driveway 6405 Rolling Hills Wetland 6334 Rolling Hills Scenario #2: 10-Year Event Scenario #1: 5- Year Event 987.50 980.02Overtopping Elevation (ft)1007.80 996.70 989.86 988.14 Existing Scenario #2: 10-Year Event Appendix A Model Results MSE 24-hr 3 5-Year Rainfall=3.57"Model #2_5-Year 2.9.2023 Printed 2/13/2023Prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 65HydroCAD® 10.10-6a s/n 02201 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 4801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=34,800 sf 3.39% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.75"Subcatchment 3: Project Site Area to Tc=7.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=2.47 cfs 0.116 af Runoff Area=192,890 sf 15.24% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.60"Subcatchment 3S: Off-site Area to Flow Length=710' Tc=11.6 min CN=74/98 Runoff=9.77 cfs 0.591 af Runoff Area=1.630 ac 12.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.53"Subcatchment 4S: 6315 Horseshoe Bend Flow Length=300' Tc=7.1 min CN=74/98 Runoff=4.24 cfs 0.208 af Runoff Area=0.790 ac 12.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.53"Subcatchment 5S: 6311 Horseshoe Bend Flow Length=260' Tc=7.0 min CN=74/98 Runoff=2.06 cfs 0.101 af Runoff Area=2.130 ac 12.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.53"Subcatchment 6S: 6307 Horseshoe Bend Flow Length=520' Tc=8.5 min CN=74/98 Runoff=5.18 cfs 0.272 af Runoff Area=1.190 ac 12.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.53"Subcatchment 7S: 6301 Horseshoe Bend Flow Length=420' Tc=9.6 min CN=74/98 Runoff=2.76 cfs 0.152 af Runoff Area=292,000 sf 18.84% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.67"Subcatchment 8S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=1,600' Slope=0.0275 '/' Tc=30.7 min CN=74/98 Runoff=9.32 cfs 0.935 af Runoff Area=90,000 sf 8.33% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.46"Subcatchment 9S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=650' Slope=0.0650 '/' Tc=11.6 min CN=74/98 Runoff=4.22 cfs 0.251 af Runoff Area=552,000 sf 5.43% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.85"Subcatchment 10S: (new Subcat) Tc=0.0 min CN=81/98 Runoff=51.35 cfs 1.954 af Runoff Area=237,000 sf 37.97% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.07"Subcatchment 11S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=790' Slope=0.0700 '/' Tc=12.5 min CN=74/98 Runoff=14.54 cfs 0.937 af Runoff Area=39,500 sf 12.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.55"Subcatchment 12S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=560' Slope=0.0750 '/' Tc=10.2 min CN=74/98 Runoff=2.07 cfs 0.117 af Runoff Area=70,800 sf 19.63% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.69"Subcatchment 13S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=300' Slope=0.1000 '/' Tc=7.0 min CN=74/98 Runoff=4.59 cfs 0.229 af Runoff Area=183,000 sf 18.03% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.66"Subcatchment 14S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=630' Slope=0.0700 '/' Tc=11.1 min CN=74/98 Runoff=9.74 cfs 0.580 af Runoff Area=38,400 sf 21.88% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.74"Subcatchment 15S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=630' Slope=0.0700 '/' Tc=11.1 min CN=74/98 Runoff=2.13 cfs 0.128 af Runoff Area=307,000 sf 5.86% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41"Subcatchment 16S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=650' Slope=0.0650 '/' Tc=14.6 min CN=74/98 Runoff=12.57 cfs 0.827 af Runoff Area=85,000 sf 18.24% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.66"Subcatchment 17S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=500' Slope=0.0400 '/' Tc=12.7 min CN=74/98 Runoff=4.28 cfs 0.270 af MSE 24-hr 3 5-Year Rainfall=3.57"Model #2_5-Year 2.9.2023 Printed 2/13/2023Prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 66HydroCAD® 10.10-6a s/n 02201 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Runoff Area=307,000 sf 5.86% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41"Subcatchment 18S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=650' Slope=0.0650 '/' Tc=14.6 min CN=74/98 Runoff=12.57 cfs 0.827 af Runoff Area=230,000 sf 8.70% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.77"Subcatchment 19S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=650' Tc=17.0 min CN=79/98 Runoff=11.12 cfs 0.779 af Runoff Area=491,000 sf 11.20% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.52"Subcatchment 20S: Flow Length=760' Slope=0.0520 '/' Tc=14.0 min CN=74/98 Runoff=21.85 cfs 1.426 af Runoff Area=173,680 sf 65.08% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.76"Subcatchment 24S: Sewered Area To Flow Length=700' Tc=9.9 min CN=80/98 Runoff=15.53 cfs 0.918 af Runoff Area=51,330 sf 25.93% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.34"Subcatchment 25S: Basin Area Tc=7.0 min CN=84/98 Runoff=4.64 cfs 0.230 af Avg. Flow Depth=1.18' Max Vel=3.40 fps Inflow=10.63 cfs 11.645 afReach 21R: (new Reach) n=0.035 L=265.0' S=0.0146 '/' Capacity=621.91 cfs Outflow=10.63 cfs 11.644 af Peak Elev=1,007.05' Storage=78 cf Inflow=11.77 cfs 0.707 afPond 3P: 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive Primary=11.74 cfs 0.707 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Tertiary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=11.74 cfs 0.707 af Peak Elev=995.92' Storage=166 cf Inflow=17.42 cfs 2.063 afPond 4P: 6311 Driveway Culvert Downstream Outflow=17.33 cfs 2.063 af Peak Elev=989.39' Storage=315 cf Inflow=19.16 cfs 2.164 afPond 5P: 6307 Second Driveway Culvert Primary=18.91 cfs 2.164 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=18.91 cfs 2.164 af Peak Elev=988.12' Storage=1,849 cf Inflow=23.84 cfs 2.437 afPond 6P: 6301 Driveway Culvert Outflow=21.32 cfs 2.437 af Peak Elev=986.47' Storage=1,617 cf Inflow=23.65 cfs 2.589 afPond 7P: Horseshoe Bend Drive Crossing Primary=12.68 cfs 1.592 af Secondary=9.54 cfs 0.995 af Outflow=22.22 cfs 2.587 af Peak Elev=979.88' Storage=12,993 cf Inflow=20.47 cfs 2.528 afPond 8P: Rolling Hills Road Driveway Primary=2.62 cfs 0.161 af Secondary=11.61 cfs 2.367 af Outflow=14.22 cfs 2.527 af Peak Elev=979.42' Storage=16,544 cf Inflow=30.63 cfs 1.211 afPond 9P: Rolling Hills Road Crossing Outflow=11.80 cfs 1.211 af Peak Elev=975.70' Storage=268,946 cf Inflow=77.70 cfs 11.647 afPond 10P: (new Pond) Outflow=10.63 cfs 11.645 af Peak Elev=979.51' Storage=38,098 cf Inflow=23.81 cfs 1.932 afPond 11P: (new Pond) Outflow=5.36 cfs 1.743 af Peak Elev=980.24' Storage=3,619 cf Inflow=35.10 cfs 2.845 afPond 12P: (new Pond) Primary=25.42 cfs 0.799 af Secondary=9.61 cfs 2.047 af Outflow=35.03 cfs 2.845 af Peak Elev=981.38' Storage=1,498 cf Inflow=33.27 cfs 2.729 afPond 13P: (new Pond) Outflow=33.25 cfs 2.729 af MSE 24-hr 3 5-Year Rainfall=3.57"Model #2_5-Year 2.9.2023 Printed 2/13/2023Prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 67HydroCAD® 10.10-6a s/n 02201 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Peak Elev=986.52' Storage=1,771 cf Inflow=30.60 cfs 2.500 afPond 14P: (new Pond) Outflow=30.57 cfs 2.500 af Peak Elev=991.32' Storage=2,214 cf Inflow=21.71 cfs 1.932 afPond 15P: (new Pond) Outflow=21.70 cfs 1.919 af Peak Elev=994.23' Storage=1,777 cf Inflow=19.86 cfs 1.804 afPond 16P: (new Pond) Outflow=19.85 cfs 1.804 af Peak Elev=1,018.16' Storage=3,069 cf Inflow=16.15 cfs 1.097 afPond 17P: (new Pond) Primary=7.33 cfs 0.977 af Secondary=8.73 cfs 0.120 af Outflow=16.06 cfs 1.097 af Peak Elev=1,024.15' Storage=3,143 cf Inflow=12.57 cfs 0.827 afPond 18P: (new Pond) Outflow=12.27 cfs 0.827 af Peak Elev=1,015.50' Storage=9,427 cf Inflow=11.12 cfs 0.779 afPond 19P: (new Pond) Outflow=5.17 cfs 0.779 af Peak Elev=978.29' Storage=4,990 cf Inflow=33.41 cfs 2.325 afPond 20P: (new Pond) Outflow=33.03 cfs 2.325 af Peak Elev=973.88' Inflow=10.63 cfs 11.644 afPond 22P: Buried 15.0" Round Culvert n=0.025 L=12.6' S=0.0198 '/' Outflow=10.63 cfs 11.644 af Peak Elev=1,034.69' Storage=35,826 cf Inflow=19.87 cfs 1.148 afPond 26P: Basin Outflow=2.37 cfs 1.148 af Peak Elev=1,006.64' Inflow=2.37 cfs 1.148 afPond 27P: MH 10 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=12.0' S=0.0083 '/' Outflow=2.37 cfs 1.148 af Peak Elev=1,010.82' Inflow=2.37 cfs 1.148 afPond 28P: MH 11 8.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=78.0' S=0.0346 '/' Outflow=2.37 cfs 1.148 af Total Runoff Area = 83.229 ac Runoff Volume = 11.849 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.71" 84.66% Pervious = 70.459 ac 15.34% Impervious = 12.769 ac MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Model #2_10-Year 2.9.2023 Printed 2/13/2023Prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 96HydroCAD® 10.10-6a s/n 02201 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 4801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=34,800 sf 3.39% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.32"Subcatchment 3: Project Site Area to Tc=7.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=3.26 cfs 0.154 af Runoff Area=192,890 sf 15.24% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.13"Subcatchment 3S: Off-site Area to Flow Length=710' Tc=11.6 min CN=74/98 Runoff=13.15 cfs 0.786 af Runoff Area=1.630 ac 12.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.06"Subcatchment 4S: 6315 Horseshoe Bend Flow Length=300' Tc=7.1 min CN=74/98 Runoff=5.74 cfs 0.280 af Runoff Area=0.790 ac 12.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.06"Subcatchment 5S: 6311 Horseshoe Bend Flow Length=260' Tc=7.0 min CN=74/98 Runoff=2.79 cfs 0.135 af Runoff Area=2.130 ac 12.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.06"Subcatchment 6S: 6307 Horseshoe Bend Flow Length=520' Tc=8.5 min CN=74/98 Runoff=7.02 cfs 0.365 af Runoff Area=1.190 ac 12.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.06"Subcatchment 7S: 6301 Horseshoe Bend Flow Length=420' Tc=9.6 min CN=74/98 Runoff=3.75 cfs 0.204 af Runoff Area=292,000 sf 18.84% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.21"Subcatchment 8S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=1,600' Slope=0.0275 '/' Tc=30.7 min CN=74/98 Runoff=12.48 cfs 1.235 af Runoff Area=90,000 sf 8.33% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.98"Subcatchment 9S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=650' Slope=0.0650 '/' Tc=11.6 min CN=74/98 Runoff=5.78 cfs 0.340 af Runoff Area=552,000 sf 5.43% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.43"Subcatchment 10S: (new Subcat) Tc=0.0 min CN=81/98 Runoff=66.36 cfs 2.570 af Runoff Area=237,000 sf 37.97% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.64"Subcatchment 11S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=790' Slope=0.0700 '/' Tc=12.5 min CN=74/98 Runoff=18.68 cfs 1.196 af Runoff Area=39,500 sf 12.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.07"Subcatchment 12S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=560' Slope=0.0750 '/' Tc=10.2 min CN=74/98 Runoff=2.80 cfs 0.157 af Runoff Area=70,800 sf 19.63% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.23"Subcatchment 13S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=300' Slope=0.1000 '/' Tc=7.0 min CN=74/98 Runoff=6.10 cfs 0.302 af Runoff Area=183,000 sf 18.03% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.19"Subcatchment 14S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=630' Slope=0.0700 '/' Tc=11.1 min CN=74/98 Runoff=13.02 cfs 0.768 af Runoff Area=38,400 sf 21.88% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.28"Subcatchment 15S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=630' Slope=0.0700 '/' Tc=11.1 min CN=74/98 Runoff=2.82 cfs 0.167 af Runoff Area=307,000 sf 5.86% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.92"Subcatchment 16S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=650' Slope=0.0650 '/' Tc=14.6 min CN=74/98 Runoff=17.41 cfs 1.128 af Runoff Area=85,000 sf 18.24% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.20"Subcatchment 17S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=500' Slope=0.0400 '/' Tc=12.7 min CN=74/98 Runoff=5.72 cfs 0.357 af MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Model #2_10-Year 2.9.2023 Printed 2/13/2023Prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 97HydroCAD® 10.10-6a s/n 02201 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Runoff Area=307,000 sf 5.86% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.92"Subcatchment 18S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=650' Slope=0.0650 '/' Tc=14.6 min CN=74/98 Runoff=17.41 cfs 1.128 af Runoff Area=230,000 sf 8.70% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.34"Subcatchment 19S: (new Subcat) Flow Length=650' Tc=17.0 min CN=79/98 Runoff=14.76 cfs 1.028 af Runoff Area=491,000 sf 11.20% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.04"Subcatchment 20S: Flow Length=760' Slope=0.0520 '/' Tc=14.0 min CN=74/98 Runoff=29.78 cfs 1.916 af Runoff Area=173,680 sf 65.08% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.41"Subcatchment 24S: Sewered Area To Flow Length=700' Tc=9.9 min CN=80/98 Runoff=19.10 cfs 1.132 af Runoff Area=51,330 sf 25.93% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.97"Subcatchment 25S: Basin Area Tc=7.0 min CN=84/98 Runoff=5.85 cfs 0.292 af Avg. Flow Depth=1.24' Max Vel=3.50 fps Inflow=11.97 cfs 15.435 afReach 21R: (new Reach) n=0.035 L=265.0' S=0.0146 '/' Capacity=621.91 cfs Outflow=11.97 cfs 15.435 af Peak Elev=1,007.13' Storage=84 cf Inflow=15.81 cfs 0.940 afPond 3P: 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive Primary=15.77 cfs 0.940 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Tertiary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=15.77 cfs 0.940 af Peak Elev=996.10' Storage=196 cf Inflow=23.04 cfs 2.644 afPond 4P: 6311 Driveway Culvert Downstream Outflow=22.94 cfs 2.644 af Peak Elev=989.46' Storage=359 cf Inflow=25.46 cfs 2.779 afPond 5P: 6307 Second Driveway Culvert Primary=25.21 cfs 2.779 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=25.21 cfs 2.779 af Peak Elev=988.01' Storage=1,564 cf Inflow=31.98 cfs 3.145 afPond 6P: 6301 Driveway Culvert Outflow=29.71 cfs 3.145 af Peak Elev=987.32' Storage=4,928 cf Inflow=33.46 cfs 3.349 afPond 7P: Horseshoe Bend Drive Crossing Primary=14.90 cfs 2.035 af Secondary=10.88 cfs 1.313 af Outflow=25.78 cfs 3.347 af Peak Elev=979.81' Storage=12,165 cf Inflow=26.36 cfs 3.269 afPond 8P: Rolling Hills Road Driveway Primary=0.81 cfs 0.008 af Secondary=22.39 cfs 3.261 af Outflow=22.39 cfs 3.269 af Peak Elev=980.02' Storage=26,633 cf Inflow=42.70 cfs 1.567 afPond 9P: Rolling Hills Road Crossing Outflow=13.40 cfs 1.567 af Peak Elev=976.18' Storage=384,606 cf Inflow=106.56 cfs 15.438 afPond 10P: (new Pond) Outflow=11.97 cfs 15.435 af Peak Elev=979.92' Storage=49,616 cf Inflow=29.27 cfs 2.509 afPond 11P: (new Pond) Outflow=6.90 cfs 2.320 af Peak Elev=980.33' Storage=3,950 cf Inflow=46.32 cfs 3.709 afPond 12P: (new Pond) Primary=36.23 cfs 1.218 af Secondary=9.81 cfs 2.490 af Outflow=46.04 cfs 3.709 af Peak Elev=981.47' Storage=1,645 cf Inflow=43.69 cfs 3.552 afPond 13P: (new Pond) Outflow=43.67 cfs 3.552 af MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Model #2_10-Year 2.9.2023 Printed 2/13/2023Prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 98HydroCAD® 10.10-6a s/n 02201 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Peak Elev=986.66' Storage=1,942 cf Inflow=39.75 cfs 3.250 afPond 14P: (new Pond) Outflow=39.71 cfs 3.250 af Peak Elev=991.40' Storage=2,279 cf Inflow=27.44 cfs 2.495 afPond 15P: (new Pond) Outflow=27.44 cfs 2.483 af Peak Elev=994.29' Storage=1,858 cf Inflow=24.90 cfs 2.328 afPond 16P: (new Pond) Outflow=24.89 cfs 2.328 af Peak Elev=1,018.23' Storage=3,245 cf Inflow=22.71 cfs 1.485 afPond 17P: (new Pond) Primary=7.49 cfs 1.200 af Secondary=15.17 cfs 0.285 af Outflow=22.66 cfs 1.485 af Peak Elev=1,024.23' Storage=3,417 cf Inflow=17.41 cfs 1.128 afPond 18P: (new Pond) Outflow=17.27 cfs 1.128 af Peak Elev=1,015.77' Storage=13,080 cf Inflow=14.76 cfs 1.028 afPond 19P: (new Pond) Outflow=6.36 cfs 1.028 af Peak Elev=978.40' Storage=5,651 cf Inflow=49.15 cfs 3.230 afPond 20P: (new Pond) Outflow=48.84 cfs 3.230 af Peak Elev=975.00' Inflow=11.97 cfs 15.435 afPond 22P: Buried 15.0" Round Culvert n=0.025 L=12.6' S=0.0198 '/' Outflow=11.97 cfs 15.435 af Peak Elev=1,035.04' Storage=40,619 cf Inflow=24.57 cfs 1.424 afPond 26P: Basin Outflow=4.42 cfs 1.424 af Peak Elev=1,007.46' Inflow=4.42 cfs 1.424 afPond 27P: MH 10 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=12.0' S=0.0083 '/' Outflow=4.42 cfs 1.424 af Peak Elev=1,021.59' Inflow=4.42 cfs 1.424 afPond 28P: MH 11 8.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=78.0' S=0.0346 '/' Outflow=4.42 cfs 1.424 af Total Runoff Area = 83.229 ac Runoff Volume = 15.641 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.26" 84.66% Pervious = 70.459 ac 15.34% Impervious = 12.769 ac STAFF REPORT Agenda Item : 9c . Council Meeting: Prepared By: Topic: Action Required: Summary : • o • o • • Page 2 Financial /B udget: Options: 1. 2. Recommendation: Counci l Action: Attachments: Department Item Cost Re-sale Sub-total Notes Administration TBD Facility review taking place following remodel Public Safety Ford SUV Explorer (565)$60,000 $10,000 $50,000 Repurposed for Reserves/Public Works/Code Enforcement Chief Squad (561)$65,000 $0 $65,000 Repurpose for City Hall Ford SUV Explorer $70,000 $0 $70,000 Fleet Addition due to added staff Key Management System $25,000 $0 $25,000 Existing System Beyond Capacity Weapon Mounted Cameras $15,000 $0 $15,000 Teathered Event and Search Camera $30,000 $0 $30,000 EZ Go Express 4x4 $15,000 $0 $15,000 Replace EZ-Go Golf Cart Speed / Message Trailer $35,000 $0 $35,000 Support and Protection Equipment $20,000 $0 $20,000 Radios, squad protective equipment Records Management System $150,000 $0 $150,000 Public Works/Parks Craftco Crack Filler $60,000 $3,000 $57,000 John Deere 4066R Tractor $51,000 $15,000 $36,000 Felling Trailer $20,000 $0 $20,000 Keep for spare (emergency) Landpride 15 ft. Flex Mower $20,000 $2,000 $18,000 John Deere 1585 Front Mower w/accessories $53,000 $7,000 $46,000 John Deere 6130M Mower Tractor $145,000 $30,000 $115,000 GMC 3/4 ton Pickup with snow plow $65,000 $10,000 $55,000 Resale depends on availability of trucks in 2023 Cat Grader $50,000 $0 $50,000 Rebuild Toro 7500 Mower $35,000 $10,000 $25,000 New equipment (received for $10k grant) Front End Loader with snow plow $265,000 $0 $265,000 New equipment John Deere 1545 Front Mower $50,000 $5,000 $45,000 Tandem Axle Dump Truck $283,000 $60,000 $223,000 Warm Storage Area Expansion $40,000 $0 $40,000 Sub-total $1,470,000 Department Item Cost Re-sale Sub-total Notes Administration Roof shingles $100,000 $0 $100,000 Public Safety Ford SUV Explorer (562)$70,000 $0 $70,000 Repurposed for Reserves/Public Works/Code Enforcement Ford SUV Explorer (566)$70,000 $0 $70,000 Repurposed for Reserves/Public Works/Code Enforcement Support and Protection Equipment $20,000 $0 $20,000 Radios, Body Cameras, squad protective equipment Public Works/Parks Wood Chipper $65,000 $10,000 $55,000 Trail Maintenance Equipment Accessories $50,000 $0 $50,000 New equipment 1/2 ton pickup $50,000 $0 $50,000 New equipment Pickup $70,000 $0 $70,000 New equipment Sub-total $485,000 2022-2023 Total $1,955,000 Street Sweeper $350,000 $0 $350,000 Removed - review watershed grant opportunities 2022 2023 Draft 2022-2023 Capital Improvement Plan STAFF REPORT Agenda Item : 10a. Council Meeting: Prepared By: Top i c : A ction Required: Summary : Financial /B udget : Options: Recommendation: Counci l Action: Attachments: STAFF REPORT Agenda Item : 10b . Council Meeting: Prepared By: Topic: Action Required: Su mmary: Financial/Bu dget: Options: Recommendation: Council Action: Attachments: STAFF REPORT Agenda Item : 10c . Council Meeting: Prepared By: Topic: Action Required: Summary: Staff Report—February 23, 2023 Council Meeting Prepared by Director Gottschalk Page 2 Financial/Budget: Staff Report—February 23, 2023 Council Meeting Prepared by Director Gottschalk Page 3 Options: Recommendati on: Council Action: Attachments: Police Officer Wellness and Retention The City of Corcoran recognizes the unique mental and physical stressors faced by law enforcement officers and the need to retain a healthy workforce for the protection of the community. Consequently, the City, in collaboration with officers, healthcare practitioners, and best practices advisors, has adopted the following wellness and retention strategies for all licensed police officers working in a full-time permanent capacity for the City: Mental Health Sabbatical The City is committed to providing sufficient time for appropriate stress recovery experiences. After completing 48 months of continuous service with the Corcoran Police Department, a full-time police officer will be eligible for a conditional opportunity to take a mental health sabbatical of 21 consecutive calendar days. During the sabbatical, the officer will receive his/her regular rate of pay for any scheduled workdays, along with continued benefit and seniority accruals. In the event that a holiday occurs during the sabbatical the officer shall be compensated as though PTO was used for that day. No PTO will be deducted from the officer’s bank if the holiday occurred during an eligible sabbatical. The Mental Health Sabbaticals will begin after January 1, 2024, and initial officer eligibility dates will be determined by the Council’s adopted roll-out schedule. Following the initial roll-out, an officer will be eligible for a 21-day sabbatical after every 48 months of continuous service with the City of Corcoran commencing from the officer’s date of hire or the last exercised sabbatical. Agency sabbaticals will be staggered and will likely not occur immediately upon eligibility. All sabbaticals will be subject to approval by the Director of Public Safety and scheduled by department management at least one year in advance. The following conditions must be met for an officer to be eligible for a sabbatical: -Officers are required to meet with the City’s contracted mental health provider prior to the sabbatical to discuss their self-care plan during the sabbatical. The plan must focus on elements of mental, physical, and spiritual wellness. The cost of this visit shall be covered by the City and conducted during regular work hours. -The officer must not work for any other employer during the sabbatical unless approved by the Director of Public Safety. Other work will not be approved if it is likely to interfere with the purpose of the sabbatical. -The officer must be in good standing with the City and remain in good standing during the sabbatical. -Upon completion of the sabbatical, the officer must not voluntarily separate from employment as a police officer with the City of Corcoran for a minimum of six more months. -The officer must notify and coordinate with the City Attorney’s Office and County Attorney’s Office to avoid the scheduling of court appearances during the sabbatical. If any of these conditions are not met, the City may require the use of the officer’s PTO to compensate for the ineligible leave period. Agenda Item: 10c1. The Director of Public Safety reserves the right for callback of the employee for investigative or prosecutorial purposes, emergency situations, or sabbatical date adjustments. If the officer is called back, the City reserves the right to adjust the leave period in order to achieve the appropriate absence for completing the officer’s self-care plan. The City reserves the right to adjust the sabbatical dates based on proximity to other periods of extended leave by the officer or other department officers or staff. This Mental Health Sabbatical policy is subject to revision at any time. This policy does not and shall not be interpreted to create a contract of employment nor create an employee entitlement to the sabbatical leave. Employees shall not be entitled to any payout for unused sabbatical leave upon separation from employment. Wellness Travel or Retreat Reimbursement The City recognizes the importance and value of travel and retreat experiences for officers as they work through stress recovery during their off time. There is value in both individual recovery efforts and quality time with the officer’s outside of work support network including immediate household family members and domestic partners. In order to encourage these experiences and the mental health and recovery benefits they facilitate, effective January 1, 2023, the City of Corcoran will provide qualified travel and vacation expense reimbursement of up to $1,500 per year, to each full-time officer, for the expenses of the officer and his/her immediate household family members and domestic partners. There is no requirement to travel any specific distance from home for reimbursement eligibility (“staycations” are permissible). Employees must submit an itemized receipt showing the eligible incurred expenses. Expenses are only eligible for reimbursement after the travel or expense has occurred. Officers must submit for reimbursement within 30 days of their first return to work. Expenses eligible for reimbursement include: -Mileage, airfare, or other travel ticket expenses (e.g. bus, train, cruise, etc.) to an eligible retreat destination. -Lodging and hotel stays including timeshare expenses, resort fees, and port fees. (Lodging or travel that includes food or beverage benefits are allowed but only if the food or beverage cost cannot be otherwise be delineated or excluded from the lodging or travel fee.) -Event tickets, venue tickets, admission fees, and experiences including taxes and fees. The following conditions must be met for reimbursement under this section: -The expense must be an eligible expense, actually incurred by the officer or an immediate household family member or domestic partner of the officer. -The expense must not be reimbursed by another source. -The officer must be in good standing with the City and remain in good standing during the time the expense is incurred. -The officer must not be on administrative or medical leave during the time the expense is incurred. -Upon receiving reimbursement, the officer must not voluntarily separate from employment as a police officer with the City of Corcoran for a minimum of three more months. If an officer does separate employment within three months of an eligible reimbursement that amount may be deducted from the officer’s remaining paycheck(s) and/or severance payment. Any other expenses incurred during the travel or vacation including other purchases, incidentals, food, beverages, and/or souvenirs are not eligible for reimbursement. Employee registration fees to compete in events where prizes or recognition may occur is not an eligible expense. Officers are encouraged to seek pre-approval from the Director of Public Safety (or his/her designee) prior to incurring the expense if they have questions about eligibility. The $1,500 per year reimbursement will be allocated on a calendar year basis and will be available to each eligible officer starting on January 1st of each year, subject to the provisions herein. Remaining unused reimbursement amounts may be carried over, however, officers may not carry over or accrue more than $6,000 in total reimbursement eligibility at any time. Officers have until January 15th to submit eligible expenses from the prior calendar year in order to avoid or mitigate a negative impact on the new year’s accrual, if the maximum accrual amount is reached. Officers who carry over more than $4,500 in unused reimbursement eligibility shall only receive a reimbursement allocation equal to the amount necessary to reach the capped accrual amount. Any officer starting after January 1st will not receive a reimbursement allocation until the following January 1st. Employees are individually responsible for any potential tax liabilities incurred by this reimbursement. This Wellness Travel and Retreat Reimbursement policy is subject to revision at any time. This policy does not and shall not be interpreted to create a contract of employment nor create an employee entitlement to the reimbursement. Unused reimbursement allocations will not be paid to the employee upon separation from employment. Health Insurance Severance Payment The City of Corcoran recognizes the value in retaining police officers for the duration of their career. Due to the stressors experienced by police officers and the early retirement age of police officers, relative to other professions, the City is committed to assisting in supporting police officers’ health care needs after retirement until they qualify for other care. Upon retirement, if an officer is not entitled to full single health insurance coverage or greater paid for by the City they shall receive the following: Beginning on January 1, 2025, upon notifying the City at least 30 days in advance of retirement from policing and providing acceptable documentation affirming retirement upon separation, eligible retiring officers will receive a health insurance severance payment added to their final severance allocation deposited in the officer’s MSRS Post-Retirement Health Savings Plan. The eligibility and amount of the payment shall be as follows: The officer who retires with a combination of years of service as a Minnesota P.O.S.T. Certified Peace Officer and age totaling 80 and having a minimum of 10 years of service as a Corcoran Police Officer, shall receive a severance payment equal to $150 for each complete month of service as a Corcoran Police Officer after January 1, 2013. This is a one-time separation payment, that will be paid only to eligible officers who meet the retirement criteria stated herein. Officers must be retiring in good standing with the City to be eligible for this payment. This Health Insurance Severance Payment policy is subject to revision at any time. This policy does not and shall not be interpreted to create a contract of employment or create an employee entitlement beyond the following: In the event this policy is discontinued at any time in the future, the City will honor a severance payment obligation for then-employed full-time police officers who achieve eligibility for the severance payment. In such event, the health insurance severance payment shall be equal to $150 for each complete month of service as a Corcoran Police Officer from January 1, 2013, through the sunset date of the policy. Year Officer 2024 R.Burns, Warren, Olson 2025 Gottschalk, Ekenberg, Decker 2026 Lawson, Andersen, Andress 2027 Edstrom, Spellacy, A. Burns Sabbatical Roll-Out Schedule *If an officer on this schedule separates employment, another officer may be moved up in the schedule provided they meet all sabbatical eligibilty requrirements. Agenda Item: 10c2. City Liability by Year:Full Career Lookback 10 Year Lookback 5 Year Lookback 3 Year Lookback 2023 Lookback # Eligible 2024 $101,700 $39,600 $21,600 $14,400 $3,600 2 -$24,600 -$19,600.00 2025 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$9,600 $400.00 2026 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,400 $20,400.00 2027 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,400 $40,400.00 2028 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,400 $60,400.00 2029 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,400 $80,400.00 2030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,400 $100,400.00 2031 $28,800 $28,800 $24,450 $20,850 $15,450 1 $51,600 $91,600.00 2032 $49,500 $49,500 $43,950 $40,350 $33,750 2 $17,100 $62,100.00 2033 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,100 $82,100.00 2034 $48,300 $37,950 $28,950 $25,350 $19,950 1 $9,150 $64,150.00 2035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,150 $84,150.00 2036 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,150 $104,150.00 2037 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,150 $124,150.00 2038 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $69,150 $144,150.00 2039 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $84,150 $164,150.00 2040 $33,900 $33,900 $33,900 $33,900 $31,650 1 $65,250 $150,250.00 2041 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,250 $170,250.00 2042 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,250 $190,250.00 2043 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,250 $210,250.00 2044 $39,450 $39,450 $39,450 $39,450 $39,450 1 $85,800 $190,800.00 2045 $44,100 $44,100 $44,100 $44,100 $41,250 1 $56,700 $166,700.00 2046 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $71,700 $186,700.00 2047 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,700 $206,700.00 2048 $50,550 $50,550 $50,550 $50,550 $46,500 1 $51,150 $176,150.00 2049 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,150 $196,150.00 2050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $81,150 $216,150.00 2051 $106,200 $106,200 $106,200 $106,200 $102,150 2 -$10,050 $129,950.00 2052 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,950 $149,950.00 2053 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,950 $169,950.00 2054 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,950 $189,950.00 *If an officer does not retire immediately upon eligibility, as this chart shows, the City could incur additional liability of $150 per month ($1,800/ year) for that officer. 2024 Start- HISP Liability by Year (Accrual Starting Now)Fund Balance 10 Year Lookback City Funding $15k/yr. Fund Balance 10 Year Lookback City Funding $20k/yr. Agenda Item: 10c3. City Liability by Year:Full Career Lookback 10 Year Lookback 5 Year Lookback 3 Year Lookback 2023 Lookback # Eligible 2025 $105,300 $43,200 $25,200 $18,000 $7,200 2 -$28,200 -$23,200.00 2026 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$13,200 -$3,200.00 2027 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800 $16,800.00 2028 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,800 $36,800.00 2029 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,800 $56,800.00 2030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,800 $76,800.00 2031 $28,800 $28,800 $24,450 $20,850 $15,450 1 $33,000 $68,000.00 2032 $49,500 $49,500 $43,950 $40,350 $33,750 2 -$1,500 $38,500.00 2033 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,500 $58,500.00 2034 $48,300 $37,950 $28,950 $25,350 $19,950 1 -$9,450 $40,550.00 2035 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,550 $60,550.00 2036 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,550 $80,550.00 2037 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,550 $100,550.00 2038 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,550 $120,550.00 2039 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,550 $140,550.00 2040 $33,900 $33,900 $33,900 $33,900 $31,650 1 $46,650 $126,650.00 2041 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,650 $146,650.00 2042 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,650 $166,650.00 2043 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $91,650 $186,650.00 2044 $39,450 $39,450 $39,450 $39,450 $39,450 1 $67,200 $167,200.00 2045 $44,100 $44,100 $44,100 $44,100 $41,250 1 $38,100 $143,100.00 2046 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53,100 $163,100.00 2047 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,100 $183,100.00 2048 $50,550 $50,550 $50,550 $50,550 $46,500 1 $32,550 $152,550.00 2049 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,550 $172,550.00 2050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,550 $192,550.00 2051 $106,200 $106,200 $106,200 $106,200 $102,150 2 -$28,650 $106,350.00 2052 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$13,650 $126,350.00 2053 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,350 $146,350.00 2054 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,350 $166,350.00 2055 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,350 $186,350.00 *If an officer does not retire immediately upon eligibility, as this chart shows, the City could incur additional liability of $150 per month ($1,800/ year) for that officer. 2025 Start- HISP Liability by Year (Accrual Starting Now)Fund Balance 10 Year Lookback City Funding $20k/yr. Fund Balance 10 Year Lookback City Funding $15k/yr. Green highlight represents the staff recommendation Agenda Item: 10c4. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item : 10d . Council Meeting: Prepared By: Topic: Action Required: Summary : Page 2 Financial /B udget : Options: Recommendation: Counci l Action: Attachments: STAFF REPORT Agenda Item : 10e. Council Meeting: Prepared By: Topic: Action Required: Summary : • Finan cial /Budget : Options: Recommendation: Cou ncil Action: Attachments: STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 10f. Council Meeting: February 23, 2023 Prepared By: Michelle Friedrich Topic: Charter Commission Appointment Action Required: Approval and Appointments Summary: The Charter Commission meets annually and is currently comprised of ten members. In the past the Charter Commission has discussed size, but the Charter does not set a specific number of commissioners. The Charter Commission can have a maximum of 15 members per Minnesota Statute 410.05 Sudivision 1. The City has received Charter Commission applications for Council consideration for re- appointment of individuals whose Charter Commission terms expires on March 1, 2023. The City has received an application from Ken Guenthner for reappointment to the Charter Commission. Financial/Budget: Charter Commission members serve without compensation. Options: 1. Appointment of Ken Guenthner to the Charter. 2. Decline the appointment and advertise for additional applicants. Recommendation: Recommend reappointment of Ken Guenthner to the Charter Commission. Council Action: Review Charter Commission application and appoint Ken Guenthner to the Charter Commission for a four-year term expiring on March 1, 2027. Attachments: 1. Charter Commission Application – Ken Guenthner Agenda Item: 11a. Page 1 of 2 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763-420-2288 email: general@corcoranmn.gov / website: www.corcoranmn.gov MEMO Meeting Date: To: From: Re: February 23, 2023 City Council Natalie Davis McKeown, Planner Active Corcoran Planning Applications The following is a status summary of active planning projects: 1.Transition/Buffer Zones ZOA (City File 22-034). After multiple discussions on this topic in 2022, the City Council reviewed a draft of a Buffer Yard Ordinance at the January 26th work session. Remaining questions included the enforcement process. Staff’s recommendation regarding enforcement will be discussed further at the February 23rd regular Council meeting. This is expected to go to the Planning Commission for a public hearing in the first half of 2023. 2.Pioneer Trail Industrial Park, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat and PUD (PID 32-119-23-34- 0013, 32-119-23-34-0007, 32-119-23-43-0005 and 32-119-23-43-0006) (City File No. 22- 039). An application was submitted to move forward with the preliminary approvals for the Pioneer Trail Industrial Park off Highway 55. The item was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing on December 1st and was recommended for approval on a 3- 1 vote. The City Council reviewed this item at the January 12th meeting, and the application was approved at the January 26th regular meeting. 3.PUD Standards Zoning Ordinance Amendment (City File No. 22-045). After various discussions on planned unit development standards in 2022, staff and City Council continued to discuss verbiage changes in the working draft of the new PUD district standards at the January 26th City Council Work Session as well as a joint Work Session with the Planning Commission and Parks and Trails Commission on February 9th. The Council asked the Planning Commission to continue discussion of the point categories at their March 2nd meeting, and the item will go back to Council for discussion on March 23rd. This is expected to go to the Planning Commission for a public hearing in the first half of 2023. 4.Rental Ordinance (City File No. 22-046). Staff and City Council continue to work through the draft ordinance and planning for administrative implementation. This item will go to another Council work session in the first quarter of 2023 before proceeding with Council approval. Since the Rental Ordinance will not be contained within the Zoning or Subdivision Ordinances of City Code, a public hearing is not required. 5.Keefe Minor Subdivision (PID 33-119-23-12-0007) (City File No. 22-063). An application for Page 2 of 2 a two-lot subdivision at 6801 Willow Drive was submitted. The application was determined to be incomplete for City review and is not currently scheduled for review by the City Council. This type of application does not require review by the Planning Commission. 6.Dish Tower Site Plan Amendment (PID 25-119-23-44-0005) (City File No. 22-066). A minor site plan amendment application was submitted for installation of new ground equipment at an existing telecommunications tower at 7205 County Road 101. This application is incomplete for review but will be approved administratively once all materials are submitted. 7.“Vollrath Compost Site Sketch Plan” (PID 19-119-23-12-0002) (City File No. 22-078). Trent Vollrath submitted an application to ask the Council for feedback on allowing a commercial compost site within the Rural Residential district. The application was determined to be incomplete at this time. 8.“MS4 Updates” (Citywide) (City File No. 23-001). Staff anticipates needing to process further changes to MS4-related regulations to comply with the City’s MS4 permit. Currently, Public Works and Engineering are focusing efforts on establishing new requirements for salt storage. The salt storage ordinance amendments are tentatively scheduled for Council review on March 9th. 9.“Gmach Accessory Dwelling Unit CUP” (PID 05-119-23-13-0011) (City File No. 23-002). George Gmach submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow an accessory dwelling unit over 960 square feet at 22600 Oakdale Drive. This item is scheduled for a public hearing at the Planning Commission on March 9th with City Council review on March 23rd. 10.“Amira Village” (PID 25-119-23-12-0002) (City File No. 23-003). Hempel Acquisition Company submitted a sketch plat application for a 141-unit development consisting of single- family homes for a senior living rental community at the Chastek property on Maple Hill Rd. This item will be reviewed informally by City Council on February 23rd. 11.“Kariniemi/Wicht Sketch Plat” (PID 18-119-23-11-0002; 18-119-23-42-0001) (City File No. 23-004). Nathan Kariniemi of Willow1 LLC submitted a sketch plat application for an Open Space & Preservation plat near Kariniemi Meadows on County Road 19 and County Road 10. The plan includes three commercial lots that wrap around the existing Public Works building in addition to 8 small residential lots off Larsen Road. The plat includes a 40-acre outlot to be preserved as open space. This item will be reviewed informally by City Council on February 23rd. 1.1 A bill for an act 1.2 relating to capital investment; appropriating money for drinking water infrastructure 1.3 in the city of Corcoran; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds. 1.4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.5 Section 1. CORCORAN; DRINKING WATER INFRASTRUCTURE. 1.6 Subdivision 1.Appropriation.$10,000,000 is appropriated from the bond proceeds 1.7 fund to the Public Facilities Authority for a grant to the city of Corcoran to construct drinking 1.8 water improvements to serve the northeast area of the city. This appropriation includes 1.9 money for a well, a new water treatment facility, and a water storage facility. 1.10 Subd. 2.Bond sale.To provide the money appropriated in this section from the bond 1.11 proceeds fund, the commissioner of management and budget shall sell and issue bonds of 1.12 the state in an amount up to $10,000,000 in the manner, upon the terms, and with the effect 1.13 prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, sections 16A.631 to 16A.675, and by the Minnesota 1.14 Constitution, article XI, sections 4 to 7. 1.15 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment. 1Section 1. HOUSE RESEARCH JF CG05101/10/23 10:58 am Municipal Service equipment,a booster station Added Attachment Item: 11b. City of Corcoran 2023 City Council Schedule Agenda Item: 12. Below is a tentative schedule for City Council meetings. The items and schedule are subject to change. March 9, 2023 Work Session (Tentative) • Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy March 9, 2023 • Park Signs Plan • Three Rivers Park District – Cooperative Agreement • Firearms Ordinance Draft • Planning Assistant – Transition PT 32 Hours and FT • MS4 – Salt Storage Ordinance • 2022 Code Enforcement Report • Joint Powers Agreement – Hackamore Project • Hackamore Project Approve Plans / Authorize Bids • Watershed Letter of Support • Broadband Comcast Contract (Tentative) • Logo Approach and Staff Process for Logo (New Brighton Example) • Construction Administration Proposal for Water Supply Projects • 2023 Goals and Measureables* March 23, 2023 • NW Trails Resolution of Support • Placeholder to THC Regulations Follow Up • PUD Ordinance Discussion • 2023A Bond Sale • Gmach AUD CUP • PUD Zoning Amendment • Re-appoint Commissioner to Expired Commission Seats – Applications thru 3/17 (Consent) April 13, 2023 (Mayor Mckee – Excused) • Commissioner Anderson • Accept NW Jaycees Tree Donation • Fund Creation • 2021 and 2022 Transfers • Juneteenth Holiday April 27, 2023 • Proclamation – National Public Service Week • Award RFP for City Park (Tentative) Page 2 of 2 May 11, 2023 • Proclamation – National Police Week May 26, 2023 • Proclamation – National Public Works Week June 8, 2023 • 2024 Budget Goals and Priorities June 22, 2023 • Progess Report – 2023 Goals and Measurables July 13, 2023 • Mid-Year Code Enforcement – Add November Report Next • Draft 2024 Budget July 27, 2023 • Supporting NW Trails DNR Funding – July 27, 2023 August 10, 2023 • Juneteenth Council Approval for 2024 • Draft 2024-25 CIP and Pre Orders • Draft 2024 Budget August 24, 2023 • September 14, 2023 • Preliminary Budget and Levy • Levy Insert September 28, 2023 • Progess Report – 2023 Goals and Measurables October 12, 2023 • October 26, 2023 Additional Future Meetings Host Special Charter Commission Meeting – March 21, 2023 at 5:30pm Annual Charter Commission Meeting – September 13, 2023 at 5:30pm