HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2009-40 Hedgestone Findings of Fact-RezoneCITY ®F C®RC®RAN
I?ESOLIJTION N®. 2009-40
1W • : •
iconded BYE, Hudolk
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING PROPERTY
LOCATED WEST OF COUNTY ROAD 101, NORTH OF HACKAMORE ROAD AND ON
BOTH SIDES OF G LEASON ROAD (PID 36-119-23-24-00011 36-119-2341-00021 36-
119-2341-0003) 36-1 19-23-1 3-0007 AND 36-119-2343-0001).
WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran has initiated the requested reclassification of the
zoning from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Single Family Residential (R-1) for the
5 properties totaling 216.78-acres and legally described as follows:
The southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 36, Township 119,
Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Laurent Property). Commitment No.
21502
The southwest quarter of the southeast quarfier of Section 36, Township 119,
Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Larson property). Commitment No.
21609
The north half of the southeast quarter of Section 36, Township 119, Ran
Hennepin County, Minnesota (Ebert property). Commitment 1`40. 21610
ge 23,
The North 215.48 feet of the south 685.68 feet of the Easfi 547.53 feet of the
north half of the southeast quarter of Section 36, Township 119, Range 23
except the road, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Ebert property)
Lot 1, Elock 1, Farrell 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minn
ta (Haley
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public
Hearing and recommends approval, and;
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcel
from PUD to R-1;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HERESY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the
request for the reclassification of the zoning from PUD to R-1 for the 216.78-acre
property, based on the following findings:
1. The "Hedgestone" PUD approvals have expired and the rezoning would simply
return the properties to the original zoning district that was applied prior t0 the
"Hedgestone" development request.
2. The proposed zoning is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Resolution 2009-40
Page 2
3. The rezoning meets the purpose and intent of the Zoning ®rdinance and,
specifically, the R-1 zoning district.
4. The existing uses are not in conflict with applicable provisions of the zoning
ordinance.
5. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the existing properties. The
properties are located in the MUSA where municipal sewer and water is planned
in the future to serve the properties and provide the potential for subdivision and
development consistent with the R-1 zoning.
6. There is an adequate buffer or transition provided between potentially
incompatible districts.
AD®PTED by the City Council the 24t" day of September 2009.
►7 Gmach, George
ME11brandt, Rosalyn
71 Thomas, Ron
ATT T:
x kZ111
x..- Daniel J. Donah'be, City Administrator
George
Milbrandt, Rosalyn
Thomas, Ron
City Seal