Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-09-23 Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda September 23, 2021 - 7:00pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Commission Representatives* 5.Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6.Presentations/Recognitions 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of September 9, 2021 Work Session* b.Draft Minutes of September 9, 2021 Council Meeting* c.Financial Claims* d.Preliminary Levy* e.Insert for Mailings* f.Construction Sign Ordinance Update* g.Call Assessment Hearings – Appaloosa Woods and Corcoran East/West Street Improvements Projects* h.City Hall Remodel – Change Order #7* i.Tavera 2nd Addition Final Plat and Final PUD Plan* j.Advanced Bond Payment – 2012B* k.Early Site Grading Work Agreement – Amberly/Bellwether* l.Resolution Approving Donation to Police Department* m.Special Event Request -- Stanchion Bar* 8.Planning Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Public Hearing – Amendment to Chapter 82 (Nuisances) of the City Code related to Outside Storage* b.Garages Too Rezoning, Variance, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, Preliminary Plat* c. Karinemi Sketch Plan* 9.Unfinished Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Draft Garbage Hauler License Requirements* 10.New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.City Park Water Connection* b.Schedule Work Session – Water Supply Planning* 11.Closed Session a.Closed session as permitted by the attorney-client privilege to discuss response related to the qui tam action filed by Steven Kleiber against Nelson Auto Center, Inc. …Continued on the following page… HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Council meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 886 3491 3367 Press *9 to speak during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88634913367 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 886 3491 3367 Participants can utilize the Raise Hand function to be recognized to speak during the Public Comment sections in the meeting. Participant video feeds will be muted. In-person comments will be received first, with the hybrid electronic means option following. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov b. Closed session to develop and consider an offer for the purchase of certain real property affecting the following parcels: PID No. Legal Description i 36-119-23-23-0008 Outlot A, Country Seasons Estates ii 36-119-23-23-0003 Lot 1, Block 1, Country Seasons Estates iii 36-119-23-23-0007 Lot 4, Block 2, Country Seasons Estates iv 36-119-23-32-0003 Lot 1, Block 3, Country Seasons Estates v 36-119-23-32-0010 Lot 8, Block 3, Country Seasons Estates vi 36-119-23-32-0015 Outlot C, Country Seasons Estates vii 36-119-23-32-0014 Outlot B, Country Seasons Estates viii 36-119-23-32-0011 Lot 9, Block 3, Country Seasons Estates ix 36-119-23-32-0012 Lot 10, Block 3, Country Seasons Estates x 36-119-23-32-0013 Lot 11, Block 3, Country Seasons Estates" 12. Staff Reports a. Active Corcoran Planning Applications* b. Charter Commission Appointment Update 13. 2021 City Council Schedule* 14. Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.corcoranmn.gov. The City of Corcoran will provide high-quality public services in a cost-effective, responsible, and professional manner in order to create a preferred environment to live, work, play, and conduct business. The City of Corcoran will become a vibrant, connected community while preserving its natural character and agricultural roots. The following values are fundamental to the City of Corcoran ’s success and the fulfillment of our mission: Honesty, Ethics, Integrity We believe that honesty, ethics, and integrity are the foundation blocks of public trust and confidence. Community Pride and Partnership We believe in creating a strong sense of community through partnerships with civic organizations, school districts, and local businesses. Efficient and Effective Service Delivery We believe providing services to residents and businesses in an efficient and effective manner makes government easier to work with and creates a business friendly environment. Community Safety We will protect the community by maintaining or improving safety through police and fire protection and by investing and maintaining the infrastructure of the City. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that the prudent stewardship and opportunistic investment of public funds is essential for confidence in government and to position the City for future success. Transparency We believe that open, honest, and proactive communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry. Processes and decision making should include opportunities to educate citizens and receive feedback. Responsible Decision Making We believe it is the responsibility of the City to address difficult issues now in order to avoid larger more difficult issues in the future. VISION VALUES CORE STRATEGIES MISSION • Enhance Corcoran’s sense of place and identity. • Provide diverse community amenities and recreational opportunities. • Maintain excellence in safety and security for our community. • Ensure high-quality, market-driven growth. • Provide high-quality, innovative municipal services. A DOPTED M ARCH 11, 2021 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 4. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commission Representatives Action Required: None – Informational Summary: The advisory commission representatives for the September 23rd Council meeting are as follows: • Planning Commission: Jim Shoulak • Parks and Trails Commission: Val Nybo Financial/Budget: N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: N/A CITY OF CORCORAN 1 City Council Work Session Minutes September 9, 2021 – 5:30 pm The Corcoran City Council met on September 9, 2021, in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City Council meeting was held in person and the public was present in person and remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee, Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Vehrenkamp were present. Councilor Bottema was excused. City Administrator Martens, Administrative Services Director Beise, Finance Manager Ung, and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk were present. Public Works Director Mattson was present remotely through electronic means. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor McKee called the work session to order at 5:30 pm. 2.Draft 2022 Budget and Financial Management Plan City Administrator Martens outlined the budget draft presented to date, cuts requested from Council, and reduction of the tax levy. City Administrator Martens reviewed the projected tax rate decrease from 43.522 to 43.168 percent. City Administrator Martens noted the preliminary levy is used as a draft for property tax notices. Council and staff discussed dust control, the impact of the tax rate decrease, and water and sewer budgets. Council and staff discussed outsourced professional planning services and in-house planning employees. Council and staff discussed the code enforcement. Council and staff discussed deferring staffing positions. Council and staff discussed the development superintendent role and operations manager roles and expectations for external versus internal hiring. Council and staff reviewed positions and gaps within departments and expectations and impacts in the 2022 budget. Council and staff discussed options for City Council Minutes. Council discussed staff retention, attracting new staff, work environment and compensation. City Administrator Martens reviewed compensation package development and current challenges within compensation structure within the higher-level staffing positions. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk reviewed past candidates, retention of staff with police departments in general, local agency candidate competition, and wage comparison with competing agencies. City Administrator Martens and Council reviewed tax impacts with a decreased tax rate, home valuation, and value of services within the City. Council and staff discussed current assessed home valuations and impacts to overall property taxes. City Administrator Martens noted the budget will be presented as a consent agenda item at the September 23 Council meeting. Council and staff discussed the Hennepin County insert and including additional information referencing different property tax types. 3.Unscheduled Items No unscheduled business. 4.Adjournment MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Nichols to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) Meeting adjourned at 6:35 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk Agenda Item 7a. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes September 9, 2021 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on September 9, 2021, in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City Council meeting was held in person and the public was present in person and remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee, Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Vehrenkamp were present. City Administrator Martens, Administrative Services Director Beise, and Public Works Director Mattson were present. Public Works Director Mattson was present through electronic means. 1.Call to Order/Roll Call Mayor McKee called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor McKee invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegian ce. 3.Oath of Office – Dean Vehrenkamp Administrative Services Director Beise administered the Oath of Office to Dean Vehrenkamp and acknowledged Mr. Vehrenkamp duly sworn in. Staff and Council welcomed Councilmember Vehrenkamp. 4.Agenda Approval MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to approve the agenda as presented. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) 5.Commission Representatives Mayor McKee noted Planning Commissioner Lanterman was present at the meeting, and Parks and Trails Commissioner Hoffmann was present through electronic means. Mayor McKee invited Commissioners Lanterman and Hoffmann to speak on relevant agenda items. 6.Open Forum (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person or telephonically during the public comment opportunity. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meet ing through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. 7.Presentations/Recognitions a.Police Oath – Josh Lawson Director of Public Safety Gottschalk introduced Officer Lawson. Administrative Services Director Beise administered the Police Officer Oath to Officer Lawson and acknowledged Officer Lawson duly sworn in. Staff and Council welcomed Officer Lawson to the City of Corcoran Police Department. b.Sergeant Promotion – Pete Ekenberg Director of Public Safety Gottschalk introduced Sergeant Ekenberg, noting his years of service, and his new promotion to sergeant within the Corcoran Police Department. Staff and Council congratulated Sergeant Ekenberg and thanked him for his service. 8.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of August 26, 2021, Work Session b.Draft Minutes of August 26, 2021, Council Meeting c.Financial Claims d.Waiver Request for Amplified Sound – Corcoran Lions Park for Buffalo Demolition Derby e.Planning Commission Resignation – Dean Vehrenkamp Agenda Item 7b. 2 f. St. John’s Lutheran School City Park Usage g. 66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements – Pay Request #1 MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Nichols to approve consent agenda items as presented. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) 9. Planning Business -- None 10. Unfinished Business (Public Comment Opportunity) City Administrator Martens invited residents to participate in person and telephonically to comment for Unfinished Business items 10a., and 10b. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. a. Northeast Corcoran Water Project Civil Engineer Steve Hegland, Stantec (formerly Wenck) presented the report including well 1 and treatment site progress to date, permit processes, and water treatment facility options. Mr. Hegland noted the water treatment facility in Corcoran will include treatment for iron and manganese and will include both flexibility and versatility to adapt to future needs. Mr. Hegland reviewed well and trunk infrastructure processes, noting the three trunk systems include sewer, raw water main, and potable water main. Mr. Hegland reviewed surrounding developments needing water treatment facility extensions and noted corridor easements and property acquisitions will be necessary to accommodate the trunk systems and extensions as the project continues. Mr. Hegland reviewed overhead tower or underground storage cost options for a water storage are similar, and the varying costs dependent upon site conditions. Mr. Hegland reviewed project timelines through the end of 2021 and into spring of 2022, noting preliminary architecture, site layout and storage type discussions in October or November of 2021. Council and staff discussed project progress and phases, and costs for water treatment design services with Stantec. Council and staff discussed prioritizing a natural environment regarding in- ground water storage and creating an amenity that adds value to a neighborhood. Council noted the footprint of an in-ground storage is greater than an above-ground tower. City Administrator Martens presented the water tower location and the projected shadows throughout the year. Council discussed impacts to future residents on the lots falling within the projected shadow locations prior to the water tower construction. Public Works Director Mattson added context noting the purpose of the feasibility study is to identify big components of the project such as storage size, land acquisition, location, etc., and represents general ideas, followed by in-depth project details and discussion once those components are established. Public Works Director Mattson noted there are several sites being targeted. Public Works Director Mattson explained the Bellwether community focus reflects the cost- effective opportunity with the new development. Public Works Director Mattson clarified the goal is to identify questions and deliver options and assist Council to make informed decisions. Council discussed the 750-gallon underground storage facility versus a 180-foot tower, local underground storage facility examples, and landscaping around underground storage facilities. Council and staff reviewed estimated cost of $14.5 million dollars and project parameters, including future security aspects discussions regarding online access to control systems within the preliminary 30 percent designs stage with consideration of overall water system security. Council and staff discussed when RFP’s will occur for the project, utilization of professional services contracts allows the City to continue with the provider for necessary service prior to construction. Council noted at the construction phase, the project will go out for bid. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Nichols to approve the preliminary design of the NE Corcoran Water Supply project in the amount of $360,000 as outlined in the proposal f rom Stantec (formerly Wenck). Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) b. Commissioner Appointment Process 3 City Administrator Martens reviewed the vacancy on the Planning Commission due to Council Vehrenkamp’s appointment to Council and noted applications for the vacant seat are due October 20 at 4:00 pm. City Administrator Martens outlined the process options available to Council for appointing an applicant to the Planning Commission. Council discussed subcommittee options, creation of the subcommittee, noting the mayor, council liaison to commission, and commission chair be a part of application review discussions. Councilor Schultz noted interest in participating on the subcommittee. City Administrator Martens noted if more than 2 councilmembers participate on the subcommittee, a quorum would be present resulting in a public special meeting. Council discussed rotating subcommittee representatives and options. Council consensus was to form a subcommittee at a later Council meeting and determine subcommittee members when application process has closed. 11. New Business (Public Comment Opportunity) City Administrator Martens invited residents to participate in person and telephonically to comment for New Business items 11a.-11d. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. a. Paving Petition – Park Trail Road City Administrator Martens outlined a paving petition for Park Trail Road and includes 7 interested properties of 13 properties on Park Trail Road. City Administrator Martens noted the remaining 6 properties on Park Trail Road are owned by one landowner and are currently vacant properties. City Administrator Martens outlined a feasibility study with Council approval would be completed on Park Trail Road to review the potential costs. City Administrator Martens noted assessments could be deferred on vacant properties, adding deferment increases carrying costs for the City. City Administrator Martens noted potential savings and efficiencies with paving the road at the time of 66th Avenue North paving. Council and staff discussed if transfer of property is treated the same as a sale of property regarding assessments and would refer to the City Attorney for guidance. Administrative Services Director Beise noted deferment under policy is Green Acres and Ag preserve. Council discussed deferred assessment timelines and the life of the road. Council asked for clarification of type of paving on Park Trail Road. City Administrator Martens noted the paved road would remain a rural section of road. Public Works Director Mattson added the road would be similar to Appaloosa Woods neighborhood roads, and is a shape and pave construction only, no road widening, and would include two cul-de-sacs for public safety, school buses, and plows. Public Works Director Mattson noted road life is 15 to 20 years for shape and pave construction, noting drain tile could be added, and possibly culvert replacements as necessary. Council debated the deferred assessment terms and noted Park Trail Road would be the third road project this year in Corcoran. City Administrator Martens noted a final determination regarding deferment terms and assessment costs will be reviewed after the feasibility study is completed. Council thanked residents for their initiative in petitioning to pave Park Trail Road. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by McKee to approve staff to initiate a feasibility study to pave Park Trail Road. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) b. Stormwater Area Charge Public Works Director Mattson reviewed how stormwater system expenses are currently funded through the general fund and discussed how revenue for stormwater management systems are commonly generated outside of the general tax levy through area charges or utility fees. Public Works Director Mattson noted current funding for stormwater system expenses. Public Works Director reviewed future stormwater system responsibilities and expectations and evaluating a mechanism to implement stormwater area charges as property develops. Council and staff discussed a fund similar to the sewer and water fund, noting at the property development stage, there could an area charge collected and allocated to an enterprise fund to be used for water resources or stormwater management systems. Staff discussed the complexity of what future water resource and stormwater systems needs may be, outside of developments, but that enhance stormwater systems, and directly 4 relate to the development. Council discussed drainage and ditch issues as developments occur, both onsite and offsite development projects. Council discussed value in evaluating a mechanism for the offsite water resource and stormwater system projects as properties develop and change. MOTION: made by Vehrenkamp, seconded by Nichols to approve the Stormwater Area Charge Study proposal as outlined from Stantec/Wenck in the amount of $14,200. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) c. Job Description Update – Public Safety Administrative Manager Director of Public Works Director Gottschalk reviewed the changes within the department, management of information systems within the department, department growth, and evolution of BCA and FBI compliance within the police department and the transition from an administrative assistant position to a public safety administrative manager position. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to approve Resolution 2021-100 Amending the Organizational Structure of the City of Corcoran Police Department. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) d. Potential Town Hall Meeting City Administrator Martens reviewed community communication avenues and the potential for a Town Hall Meeting for Corcoran residents. Council and staff reviewed local venue possibilities, resident opportunities to reach out to Council, public engagement at Council meetings, and potential interest in a Town Hall Meeting. Council reviewed topics that could be included in discussions at a Town Hall Meeting, combining a Town Hall Meeting with another City event s. Council and staff discussed different ways residents can obtain information regarding developments and active projects in Corcoran. Council consensus created a Town Hall subcommittee of Mayor McKee and Councilor Vehrenkamp to organize a future resident Town Hall Meeting. 12. Staff Reports -- None 13. 2021 City Council Schedule City Administrator Martens noted the upcoming Council schedule. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Vehrenkamp to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Vehrenkamp (Motion carried 4:0) Meeting adjourned at 8:33 pm. Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk Agenda Item 7c. Council Meeting Date:9/23/2021 FINANCIAL CLAIMS Prepared By:Maggie Ung CHECK RANGE Agenda Item: FUND #500 ESCROW CLAIMS Amount Project name $0.00 Total Fund #500 =-$ (See attached Payments Detail) Agenda Item: 7c. Paid to SEE THE REGISTER FOR #500 CLAIMS Total 7c.ALL OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMS 261,857.21$ (See attached Check Detail Register) Total Checks 261,857.21$ Total of Auto Deductions 174,664.04$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL 436,521.25$ Date Paid to Amount 9/3/2021 MN PERA 15,808.00$Pension Plan 9/3/2021 RevTrak 1,195.00$Credit Card Fees 9/3/2021 ACH 15.00$ ACH Fee 9/7/2021 Optum 14,053.16$PP11-PP17 Employee HSA 9/7/2021 State of MN 26,400.00$PP11-PP17 Deferred Compensation and Healthc 9/9/2021 ADP 59,553.45$Net Payroll 9/9/2021 ADP 22,653.68$Payroll Taxes 9/9/2021 RevTrak 1,380.09$Credit Card Fees 9/13/2021 MN PERA 16,113.14$Pension Plan 9/14/2021 Optum 3,974.81$Employee HSA 9/14/2021 State of MN 4,416.28$Deferred Compensation and Healthcare Savings 9/14/2021 MN Dept of Revenue 61.56$ Fuel Tax 9/3/2021 BCA Training 375.00$PD Training 9/7/2021 Larson Electronics 7,230.98$Insurance Claim 9/9/2021 ZOOM 16.11$ Zoom for Council Worksession 9/9/2021 ZOOM 69.88$ Zoom for Council Meetings 9/13/2021 FLEETIO.COM 30.00$ PD Software 9/13/2021 PosPaper 67.90$ PD Thermal Paper 9/13/2021 Breezy Point 615.00$PD Training 9/13/2021 Breezy Point 615.00$PD Training 9/15/2021 Sensible Land Use Coal 20.00$ Planner Training Total 174,664.04$ Auto Deductions / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursements *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 09/17/21 11:08 AM Page 1 September 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice 10100 Farmers State Bank ADP, LLCUnpaid $304.93 PAYROLL ENDING 07/31/2021E 100-41941-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 586405547 $420.66 PAYROLL ENDING 08/20/2021E 100-41941-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 587300615 $290.67 PAYROLL ENDING 09/03/2021E 100-41941-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 588134148 Total ADP, LLC $1,016.26 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESUnpaid $439.09 BULLETIN BOARDE 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 1DDX-VN9P-R $33.04 PD PINE 100-42100-417 Uniforms 1H1W-QJXF-F Total AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES $472.13 AMS OILUnpaid $88.08 OILE 100-43100-212 Motor Fuels 2089 Total AMS OIL $88.08 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANYUnpaid $1,261.75 GASOLINEE 100-43100-212 Motor Fuels 1872029 $1,086.48 GASOLINEE 100-43100-212 Motor Fuels 1883390 $1,358.65 GASOLINEE 100-42100-212 Motor Fuels 1883391 Total BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY $3,706.88 BEISE, JESSICAUnpaid $17.70 MILEAGEE 100-41400-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $1,275.00 DEPENDENT CARE REIMBURSEMENTG 100-21709 Dependent Care FSA Withhold 05/062021 Total BEISE, JESSICA $1,292.70 BIFFS INC.Unpaid $174.00 PORTER POTTY RENTALE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) W831253 $76.50 PORTER POTTY RENTALE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) W831254 $250.50 PORTER POTTY RENTALE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) W831255 $76.50 PORTER POTTY RENTALE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) W831256 $174.00 PORTER POTTY RENTALE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) W831257 Total BIFFS INC.$751.50 BLACKFIRE CREATIVEUnpaid $1,474.00 PD SIGNSE 100-42100-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) 5357 $1,474.68 PD SIGNSE 100-42100-223 Building Repair Supplies 5357 Total BLACKFIRE CREATIVE $2,948.68 BOYER TRUCKSUnpaid $13.39 PARTSE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 03P9461 Total BOYER TRUCKS $13.39 BRODERSEN, SHANEUnpaid $187.61 UTILITY REFUNDR 601-49400-36233 Refunds/Reimbursements UB 082021 Total BRODERSEN, SHANE $187.61 CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDERUnpaid *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 09/17/21 11:08 AM Page 2 September 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice $546.26 66TH AVE CORRIDOR EASEMENT ACQUISITIONE 427-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 08312021 $356.25 GARAGES TOOG 500-20228 Garages RZ, VAR, SP/CUP 21-016 08312021 $47.50 TAVERAG 500-20332 Lennar Tavera Development 08312021 $2,050.64 CRIMINAL EXPENSESE 100-42100-304 Legal Fees 08312021 $43.43 PROFESSIONAL SERVICESE 100-42100-304 Legal Fees 08312021 $32.50 CRIMINAL EXPENSESE 205-42100-304 Legal Fees 08312021 $71.25 RAVINIA 13THG 500-20445 Ravinia 9th FP and PUD 17-042 08312021 $1,935.65 CIVILE 100-41600-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 08312021 $71.25 MAYOR RESTORATION ORDER APPEALE 100-41600-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 08312021 Total CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER $5,154.73 CENTURY LINKUnpaid $138.29 LAND LINE/FIRE MONITORING-9100E 100-43100-321 Telephone 08282021 Total CENTURY LINK $138.29 CINTAS - 470Unpaid $46.73 PUBLIC WORKSE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 4095210416 $58.34 CITY HALLE 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 4095210458 $164.01 UNIFORMSE 100-43100-417 Uniforms 4095210496 Total CINTAS - 470 $269.08 CIRCLE K FLEETUnpaid $19.52 FLEET FUEL CARDE 100-42100-212 Motor Fuels 73920652 Total CIRCLE K FLEET $19.52 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHUnpaid $1,539.00 SUPPORT SERVICESE 100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 314540 $872.00 SUPPORT SERVICESE 100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 314963 Total COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH $2,411.00 CORCORAN COMMUNITY FUNDUnpaid $520.00 BEAN BAG TOURNAMENT COUNTRY DAZER 100-45200-36233 Refunds/Reimbursements Total CORCORAN COMMUNITY FUND $520.00 CORE & MAINUnpaid $861.10 DOWNTOWN STORMWATERE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) P522907 Total CORE & MAIN $861.10 DELTA DENTALUnpaid $187.40 DENTAL INSURANCEE 100-41400-131 Employer Paid Health Total DELTA DENTAL $187.40 DIAMOND MOWERSUnpaid $356.82 SUPPLIESE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 0204542 Total DIAMOND MOWERS $356.82 ECM PUBLISHERS INCUnpaid $87.06 ORDINANCE 2021-426E 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 851875 $51.66 SEPT 23 AMENDMENTE 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 853005 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 09/17/21 11:08 AM Page 3 September 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC $138.72 EMPLOYEE RELATIONSUnpaid $659.91 BACKGROUND CHECKE 100-42100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 91109 Total EMPLOYEE RELATIONS $659.91 EXPRESS FIRE PROTECTIONUnpaid $1,055.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTIONE 411-43100-520 Buildings and Structures 12421 Total EXPRESS FIRE PROTECTION $1,055.00 FERGUSON WATERWORKSUnpaid $670.44 WATER METERSE 601-49400-215 Water Meters 0481700 Total FERGUSON WATERWORKS $670.44 FP MAILING SOLUTIONSUnpaid $128.85 QTRLY MAIL METERE 100-41941-201 Postage/Shipping RI105026702 Total FP MAILING SOLUTIONS $128.85 GOPHER STATE ONE CALLUnpaid $242.33 SERVICEE 601-49400-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) $242.32 SERVICEE 602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) Total GOPHER STATE ONE CALL $484.65 GRAINGERUnpaid $140.30 PAPER TOWELSE 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 9041735532 Total GRAINGER $140.30 H & H GLASSUnpaid $450.00 RECONFIGURE GLASSE 100-42100-223 Building Repair Supplies 092021 Total H & H GLASS $450.00 HEINECKE, ERIKUnpaid $350.00 GLASS REPAIRE 100-42100-223 Building Repair Supplies 092021 Total HEINECKE, ERIK $350.00 HENN CO SHERIFF-MC131Unpaid $75.00 PD BOOKINGE 100-42100-301 Prisoner 1000170764 Total HENN CO SHERIFF-MC131 $75.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECHUnpaid $1,356.73 Hennepin Co Radio LeaseE 100-42100-323 Radio Units 1000171001 $220.95 PW RADIO FEEE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 1000171068 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH $1,577.68 HLS OUTDOOR - BROOKLYN PARKUnpaid $392.36 PW SUPPLIESE 100-45200-221 Maintenance Projects 5098596-001 Total HLS OUTDOOR - BROOKLYN PARK $392.36 HOLIDAY COMPANIESUnpaid *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 09/17/21 11:08 AM Page 4 September 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice $60.00 CAR WASHE 100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 092021 Total HOLIDAY COMPANIES $60.00 LANDFORMUnpaid $71.00 RAVINIA 4TH ADDITION FINAL PUD & FINAL PLAT 16- 004 G 500-20396 Ravinia 4th Addition 32044 $376.75 BASS LAKE CROSSING FP FPUD & DA 17-022G 500-20430 Bass Lk Cross FP, FPUD, 17-022 32045 $738.00 BASS LAKE ESTATES FP & FINAL PUD 17-036G 500-20442 Bass Lake Est. FP, PUD 17-036 32045 $106.50 RAVINIA 10TH FP & FINAL PUD 18-034G 500-20465 Ravinia 10th FP & PUD 18-034 32046 $35.50 KARINEIMI FINAL PLAT 20-036G 500-20497 Kariniemi PP 20-016 32047 $142.00 NAPA CUP AND SP 21-004G 500-20223 Napa Site Plan CUP 21-004 32048 $35.50 REFUGE AT RUSH CREEK VACATION 21-005G 500-20459 Refuge of Rush Creek FP 18-028 32048 $1,861.50 URBAN CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION 21-011E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 32048 $35.50 D&D SERVICE CUP SE AND VAR 21-012G 500-20227 D&D Service CUP SP VAR 21-012 32048 $71.00 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTE 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 32048 $1,868.50 GARAGES RZ, VAR, SP & CUP 21-016G 500-20228 Garages RZ, VAR, SP/CUP 21-016 32048 $142.00 AMBERLEY & BELLWETHER RZ PP PUD 21-017G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 32048 $667.50 DORNSBACH CUP 21-018G 500-20229 Dornsbach CUP 21-018 32048 $426.00 ZONING & LAND USE MAP UPDATE 21-020E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 32048 $284.00 FRANZEN FINAL PLAT 21-021G 500-20221 Franzen Minor Subd #20-049 32048 $35.50 MAGNAN DEV RIGHTS APPEAL 21-024G 500-20356 Magnan Dev Rights 32048 $35.50 GORDON COUNTRY ESTATES 21-025G 500-20357 Gordon Country Estates 32048 $997.25 COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS 21-028G 500-20490 Cook Lake - Schommer 32048 $284.00 ACCESSORY BUILDING AMENDMENTE 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 32048 $319.50 BECHTOLD FARM PP 21-030G 500-20361 Bechtold Farm 32048 $830.00 NUISANCE ORDINANCE UPDATES 20-032E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 32048 $1,317.00 KARINIEMI ROEHLKE SKETCH 20-033G 500-20484 Kariniemi WCA 32048 $687.00 ZONING AMENDMENT FOR ASSEMBLY USES 21-034E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 32048 $2,124.00 TAVERA 2ND ADD FP AND FPUD 21-036G 500-20332 Lennar Tavera Development 32048 $1,383.00 AMBERLEY & BELLWETHER 6TH FP AND FPUD 21- 037 G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 32048 $525.50 GORDON'S COUNTRY ESTATE 1ST ADDITION FP 21- 038 G 500-20357 Gordon Country Estates 32048 $6,356.25 CITY BUSINESSE 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 32048 $2,656.50 CODE ENFORCEMENTE 100-41920-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 32048 $200.00 MTG-CITY MEETINGSE 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 32048 Total LANDFORM $24,612.25 LOBERG ELECTRIC INCUnpaid $191.52 FIRE ALARME 411-43100-520 Buildings and Structures 27819 Total LOBERG ELECTRIC INC $191.52 MARTIN-MCALLISTERUnpaid $1,350.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONE 100-42100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 14104 Total MARTIN-MCALLISTER $1,350.00 MENARDS MAPLE GROVEUnpaid $11.99 PADLOCKE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 87924 $23.98 PADLOCKE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 88030 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 09/17/21 11:08 AM Page 5 September 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice Total MENARDS MAPLE GROVE $35.97 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIROUnpaid $6,213.01 MATERIAL TREATMENTE 602-49450-312 MCES Sewage Treatment Total METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRO $6,213.01 MILLER CHEVROLETUnpaid $140.28 PADE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 170764 Total MILLER CHEVROLET $140.28 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHUnpaid $884.00 SERVICEE 100-42100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) AUG2021 otal MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH $884.00 NAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORANUnpaid $100.56 BATTERYE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 362802 $61.99 PW SUPPLIESE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 363472 $15.69 BATTERYE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 366288 $12.99 FREIGHTE 100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 366297 $335.69 PW SUPPLIESE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 366308 $25.16 PW SUPPLIESE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 366311 $5.29 GLASS WIPESE 100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 368400 $21.98 DEF FLUIDE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 369214 Total NAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORAN $579.35 NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICESUnpaid $45,000.00 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT BOND PAYMENTE 309-47000-600 Debt Srv Principal (GENERAL) CORCO12A $787.50 INTERESTE 309-47000-610 Interest CORCO12A $495.00 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FEEE 309-47000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees CORCO12A Total NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICES $46,282.50 NOVA FIRE PROTECTION INCUnpaid $962.50 LABORE 100-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies 39018 Total NOVA FIRE PROTECTION INC $962.50 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.Unpaid $2,688.00 PARK PESTICIDESE 100-45200-221 Maintenance Projects 46683344 $2,016.00 PARK PESTICIDESE 100-45200-221 Maintenance Projects 46683356 Total NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.$4,704.00 OFFICE DEPOTUnpaid $57.38 SUPPLIESE 100-41941-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) 192164084001 $14.99 SIGNE 100-41941-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) 192270027001 Total OFFICE DEPOT $72.37 ON-SITE MEDICAL SERVICES INCUnpaid $90.00 HEARING TESTINGE 100-42100-208 Training and Instruction 21542 Total ON-SITE MEDICAL SERVICES INC $90.00 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 09/17/21 11:08 AM Page 6 September 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice REINKING, MARKUnpaid $23.00 EXAM FEE REIMBURSEMENTE 601-49400-433 Dues and Memberships 092021 Total REINKING, MARK $23.00 SITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLYUnpaid $45.62 DRAINTECHE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 112527117-00 $12.94 VALVE BOXE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 112556502-00 Total SITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY $58.56 STREICHER S POLICE EQUIPMENTUnpaid $19.99 POLICE EQUIPMENTE 100-42100-417 Uniforms I1521418 $209.92 UNIFORME 100-42100-417 Uniforms I1521539 $149.98 UNIFORME 100-42100-417 Uniforms I1523618 Total STREICHER S POLICE EQUIPMENT $379.89 SUPERIOR BACKGROUND INVESTUnpaid $1,147.50 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONSE 100-42100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $967.50 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONSE 100-42100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $1,372.50 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONSE 100-42100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $1,282.50 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONSE 100-42100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) Total SUPERIOR BACKGROUND INVEST $4,770.00 TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVEUnpaid $75.00 PD INVESTIGATIONSE 100-42100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 202108 Total TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE $75.00 TWIN CITY SEED CO.Unpaid $235.00 DOWNTOWN STORMWATERE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 50566 Total TWIN CITY SEED CO.$235.00 VERIZON WIRELESSUnpaid $1,335.00 CELL SERVICEE 100-42100-321 Telephone Total VERIZON WIRELESS $1,335.00 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC.Unpaid $1,992.50 TRAIL HAVEN/SCHUTTE RD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT DESIGN E 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1828202 $39.00 CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW & APPROVALSG 500-20335 Lennar Eng Plan Review/Modific 1828203 $8,178.47 LENNAR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONG 500-20335 Lennar Eng Plan Review/Modific 1828203 $4,290.88 66TH ST SURVEYINGE 427-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 1828204 $147.00 66TH ST DESIGNE 427-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 1828204 $13,877.60 66TH ST CONSTRUCTIONE 427-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 1828204 $427.00 2020 SE CORCORAN TRUNK WATERMAINE 601-49400-303 Engineering Fees 1828205 $491.25 TRANSPORTATIONE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1828206 $1,540.00 STORMWATER PERMITTING/DESIGNE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1828207 $1,650.00 SCHERBER/DALHKE GARAGE TOO DELINEATIONG 500-20201 Building Permits Payable 1828208 $300.00 SCHERBER PROPERTYG 500-20201 Building Permits Payable 1828208 $487.50 RUSH CREEK RESERVE WETLAND BANKG 500-20201 Building Permits Payable 1828208 $1,012.50 RESIDENT ITEMSE 100-43170-299 Watershed LGU 1828208 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 09/17/21 11:08 AM Page 7 September 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice $472.50 ERNIE MAYERS WCA VIOLATIONE 100-43170-299 Watershed LGU 1828208 $351.50 19701 JACKIE LANEG 500-20201 Building Permits Payable 1828208 $120.00 20240 HACKAMORE ROADG 500-20201 Building Permits Payable 1828208 $501.50 WAWRAG 500-20201 Building Permits Payable 1828208 $1,020.00 BECHTOLD ROAD (SKIES LIMIT)G 500-20201 Building Permits Payable 1828208 $264.00 GENERAL ENGINEERING & PROJECT COORDINATION G 500-20332 Lennar Tavera Development 1828209 $1,457.00 PLAN REVIEWG 500-20332 Lennar Tavera Development 1828209 $922.50 STORMWATERG 500-20332 Lennar Tavera Development 1828209 $7,493.83 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONG 500-20332 Lennar Tavera Development 1828209 $942.94 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONG 500-20482 Nelson Sketch Plan 19-023 1828211 $2,009.00 PLAN REVIEWG 500-20488 Rush Creek Reserve 1828212 $2,763.75 STORMWATERG 500-20488 Rush Creek Reserve 1828212 $11,923.46 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONG 500-20488 Rush Creek Reserve 1828212 $1,266.35 BASS LAKE CROSSINGSG 500-20438 Bass Lk CR M/I HomeEngineering 1828249 $1,801.66 BASS LAKE ESTATESG 500-20423 Bass Lake Est Skch PUD 17-015 1828249 $235.60 COLD STORAGE CROSSINGSG 500-20423 Bass Lake Est Skch PUD 17-015 1828249 $747.50 REFUGE AT RUSH CREEK WETLAND BANKG 500-20459 Refuge of Rush Creek FP 18-028 1828249 $2,472.00 SCHERBER HWY 55G 500-20477 Scherber CR30 WCA LGU 1828249 $852.50 NAPAG 500-20223 Napa Site Plan CUP 21-004 1828249 $310.50 FRANZEN PRELIMINARY PLATG 500-20221 Franzen Minor Subd #20-049 1828249 $5,064.25 D&DG 500-20227 D&D Service CUP SP VAR 21-012 1828249 $560.48 KARINEIMI ROLLING HILLSG 500-20497 Kariniemi PP 20-016 1828249 $690.00 BECHTOLD FARM DEVELOPMENTG 500-20361 Bechtold Farm 1828249 $5,078.50 VANBLARICOM PLAN REVIEWG 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 1828251 $5,609.65 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONG 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 1828251 $645.50 SEWER UTILITY PLANNING/GIS SERVICESE 602-49450-303 Engineering Fees 1828253 $228.00 WATER UTILITY NE WATER SUPPLYE 601-49400-303 Engineering Fees 1828254 $257.75 PULTE UTILITY CONNECTIONE 601-49400-234 Inspections 1828255 $257.75 PULTE UTILITY CONNECTIONE 602-49450-234 Inspections 1828255 $1,274.00 PULTE BUILDING PERMIT SERVEY REVIEWE 100-42400-303 Engineering Fees 1828255 $209.13 RAVINIA UTILITY CONNECTIONE 601-49400-234 Inspections 1828255 $209.12 RAVINIA UTILITY CONNECTIONE 602-49450-234 Inspections 1828255 $612.50 RAVINIA BUILDING PERMIT SERVEY REVIEWE 100-42400-303 Engineering Fees 1828255 $209.75 BASS LAKE CROSSING UTILITY CONNECTIONE 601-49400-234 Inspections 1828255 $209.75 BASS LAKE CROSSING UTILITY CONNECTIONE 602-49450-234 Inspections 1828255 $196.00 BASS LAKE BUILDING PERMIT SERVEY REVIEWE 100-42400-303 Engineering Fees 1828255 $1,093.50 WETLANDSG 500-20482 Nelson Sketch Plan 19-023 1828257 $400.00 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION/LEGAL/PROPERTYG 500-20482 Nelson Sketch Plan 19-023 1828257 $727.84 SURVEYINGG 500-20482 Nelson Sketch Plan 19-023 1828257 $1,485.00 DESIGNG 500-20482 Nelson Sketch Plan 19-023 1828257 $112.00 BIDDINGG 500-20482 Nelson Sketch Plan 19-023 1828257 $1,581.50 CONSTRUCTIONG 500-20482 Nelson Sketch Plan 19-023 1828257 $1,323.00 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICESE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1828258 $549.00 PARK PLANNINGE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1828258 $1,324.00 APPALOOSA WOODSG 500-20204 Appaloosa Woods Feasibility 1828258 $2,600.00 TURN LANES PROJECT DESIGNG 500-20488 Rush Creek Reserve 1828259 $10,407.25 CORCORAN TRAIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGNE 429-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1828260 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 09/17/21 11:08 AM Page 8 September 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice $2,704.75 ELM CREEK CULVERT SURVEYE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1828262 Total WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC.$117,981.76 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIREUnpaid $595.08 ROLLERE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 889081 $50.82 VEHICLE REPAIRE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 890313 $30.00 TIRE REPAIRE 100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 890850 Total WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $675.90 WSBUnpaid $21,397.75 HACKAMOREE 419-43100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) R-017789-000- Total WSB $21,397.75 XCEL ENERGYUnpaid $18.02 STREET LIGHTINGE 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights 746077998 $24.78 UTILITIESE 100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 746682317 $138.89 UTILITIESE 100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 746792378 Total XCEL ENERGY $181.69 ZIEGLER INCUnpaid $80.95 CYLINDERE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) IN000161447 $81.76 CYLINDERE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) IN000162196 $1,870.00 CORCORAN COUNTRY DAZE - JAYCEESE 100-43100-810 Refunds/Reimbursements IN000229436 Total ZIEGLER INC $2,032.71 ZUTHER, SHAWNAUnpaid $15.12 MILEAGEE 100-41400-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) Total ZUTHER, SHAWNA $15.12 10100 Farmers State Bank $261,857.21 Fund Summary 10100 Farmers State Bank 100 GENERAL FUND $67,244.21 205 DWI FORFEITURE FUND $32.50 309 D/S-EQUIPMENT CERTS $46,282.50 411 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY $1,246.52 419 HACKAMORE UPGRADE (LENNAR) $21,397.75 427 GLEASON/66TH PARKWAY EXTENSION $18,861.74 429 CORCORAN TRAIL EAST/WEST $10,407.25 500 ESCROW HOLDING FUND $86,152.28 601 WATER $2,455.01 602 SEWER $7,777.45 $261,857.21 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7d. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: 2022 Preliminary Levy Action Required: Approval Summary: Annually by September 30th the City must certify a Preliminary Levy for the following year. Once certified, the levy can decrease but not increase. Hennepin County will use the Preliminary Levy to send a property specific notice in November, which will inform each property owner of proposed taxes for 2022. The City will then hold its Truth in Taxation Budget Meeting accepting public comment on December 9th and consider approving the Final Levy at that same meeting. The City Council provided initial budget direction in June and reviewed the first draft in August. Since that time staff has refined the budget in order to meet the goals of the Council which include meeting the needs of a growing city while maintaining or reducing the tax rate. The proposed preliminary levy for adoption is in the amount of $5,728,847 which is $91,124 lower than the first draft of the budget. The result is an anticipated tax rate of 43.168% as compared to the current tax rate of 43.522%. This will be the fifth consecutive year of lowering the City’s tax rate. The levy (property taxes) is the primary source of funds to pay for City operations. The charts on this, and the following page of the report show revenues and expenditures by category: As stated earlier, the revised budget sets the Preliminary Levy at $5,728,847. This is a $683,470 or 13.55% increase from 2021. The tax rate however is projected to decrease slightly from 43.522% to 43.168%. 2021 2022 Preliminary Levy Difference Total Levy $5,045,377 $5,728,847 $683,470 Tax Rate 43.522% 43.168% (0.354) Financial/Budget: The 2022 preliminary levy proposes a 13.55% property tax levy increase however also projects a slight decrease in tax rate. A reduced tax rate means that properties with no change in value would see a decrease in City taxes. Properties with valuati on increases would likely see an increase. According to the City Assessor, the average valuation increase for an existing residential home was 3.9%. Using a base value of $400,000, the below table shows the anticipated City tax impact: Home Value Tax Capacity Tax Rate City Tax 2021 $400,000 $3,987.60 43.522% $1,735.48 2022 $415,600 $4,156.00 43.168% $1,794.06* *$58.58 increase ($4.88/month) or 3.4% One way to view the financial impact is considering what the increase in taxes provide for residents of the City. For less than $5/month, the following benefits are provided: •Facilitation of the 2022 general election •Additional in-house engineering support •Additional in-house planning support •No billing for dust control •Additional recreation staffing to allow for park planning •Additional Community Service Officer hours •Continuation of existing services with cost increases Options: 1.Approve Resolution 2021-107 Adopting Preliminary Proposed Tax Levy Collectible in 2022 in the amount of $5,728,847 2.Approve Resolution 2021-107 Adopting Preliminary Proposed Tax Levy Collectible in 2022 in a different amount Recommendation Approve Resolution 2021-107 Adopting Preliminary Proposed Tax Levy Collectible in 2022 in the amount of $5,728,847 Council Action: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 2021-107 Adopting Preliminary Proposed Tax Levy Collectible in 2022 in the amount of $5,728,847 Attachments: 1.2022 Draft Budget – Rev. 2 2.Resolution 2021-107 Adopting Preliminary Proposed Tax Levy Collectible in 2022 1 CITY OF CORCORAN Draft September 9, 2021 2 2021 Rev 2 3 OSA LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2016 BUDGET 2017 BUDGET 2018 BUDGET 2019 BUDGET 2020 BUDGET 2021 BUDGET 2022 Budget BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2021/2022 4 CITY HALL DEPARTMENTS COMMENTS 5 City Council 6 41100-100 Wages & Salaries 6,600 19,260 19,260 19,260 19,260 19,260 19,260 -$ 7 41100-122 FICA / SS 409 1,195 1,195 1,195 1,195 1,195 1,195 -$ 8 41100-126 Medicare 96 280 280 280 280 280 280 -$ 9 41100-208 Training 1,000 2,500 1,000 1,500 5,000 6,500 6,500 -$ 10 41100-210 Operating Expense - 3,000 3,000 1,500 1,500 3,000 3,000 -$ Electronic Device Stipend 11 41100-364 Workers' Compensation 75 95 70 74 71 -$ 12 8,180 26,330 24,805 23,809 27,306 30,235 30,235 -$ 13 14 News Letter/Website -$ 15 41130-351 News letter, Misc. literature 6,000 6,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000 500$ 17 41130-354 Website 1,500 2,000 2,000 5,500 4,500 5,000 5,000 -$ 18 7,500 8,500 10,000 14,000 13,500 14,500 15,000 500$ 19 20 Elections -$ 21 41410-210 Operating Supplies 7,000 1,600 8,500 1,700 14,000 2,400 18,000 15,600$ 22 7,000 1,600 8,500 1,700 14,000 2,400 18,000 15,600$ 23 24 Auditor -$ 25 41540-300 Professional Services 20,000 23,000 23,000 24,000 24,500 25,000 28,000 3,000$ Abdo, Eick & Meyers - Additional Federal Review with ARPA 26 Financial Services 6,000 7,500 7,500 8,000 8,000 12,000 15,000 3,000$ Accounting/Audit Prep & OPEB actuarial from Gallagher 29 26,000 30,500 30,500 32,000 32,500 37,000 43,000 6,000$ 30 -$ 31 Assessor -$ 32 41550-210 Operating Supplies 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 -$ 33 41550-300 Professional Services 59,000 57,000 59,250 65,500 66,700 94,000 101,000 7,000$ Assessing agreement with Hennepin County 34 60,000 58,000 60,250 66,500 67,700 95,000 102,000 7,000$ 35 36 Attorney -$ 37 41600-300 Professional Services 31,000 27,000 29,000 31,000 32,000 34,000 38,000 4,000$ 38 31,000 27,000 29,000 31,000 32,000 34,000 38,000 4,000$ 39 40 City Charter -$ 41 41000-210 Operating Supplies -$ 42 41000-300 Professional Services -$ 43 - - - - - - -$ 44 45 Other General Government -$ 49 41900-210 Operating Supplies 4,600 4,000 4,000 6,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 500$ 50 41900-300 Professional Srvs 5,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 12,500 10,500 11,500 1,000$ mental health policy costs ($5,500) 51 41900-321 Telephone - -$ 52 41900-360 Insurance 68,000 65,000 61,000 68,000 71,050 80,000 88,000 8,000$ 53 41900-430 Misc. Banking Charges - -$ 54 41900-433 Dues & Memberships 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 -$ 64 41900-810 Refunds/Reimbursements -$ 65 104,600 104,000 102,000 113,000 116,050 123,500 133,000 9,500$ 66 67 City Hall Operating Expenses -$ 68 41941-200 Office/Computer Supplies 6,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,750 4,500 4,750 250$ 69 41941-201 Postage/Shipping 3,000 3,250 3,500 3,500 3,750 3,750 4,000 250$ 70 41941-207 Computer / Copier Supplies - - - - - -$ 71 41941-210 Operating Supplies 17,000 17,000 17,500 19,000 19,000 19,500 20,000 500$ Cintas, Zep, Adam's Pest Control, Hearing Notices. 72 41941-300 Professional Services 9,000 12,000 12,000 12,500 15,500 15,500 16,000 500$ Admin Fees (ADP), Ordinance Codification. 73 41941-321 Telephone 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 -$ 74 41941-352 Gen. Notices Public Hearing information - - - - - -$ 75 41941-364 Workers Comp Insur. ( Misc. Vol. Commissioners Staff)25 25 25 26 - -$ 76 41941-380 Utilities / Outside Services 15,500 16,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 16,000 16,000 -$ Center Point, Randy's, Wright Henn Elec, Wright Henn Security. 77 41941-400 Repairs /Maintenance Bldg.12,000 12,000 12,000 16,500 16,500 19,500 19,500 -$ 78 41941-430 Misc. Banking Charge - 300 300 300 300 400 400 -$ 79 41941-432 Credit Card Fees - - - 750 3,750 7,000 8,000 1,000$ Increased use of credit cards 80 41941-520 Buildings & Structures 5,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 -$ 81 41941-810 Refunds/Reimbursements - - - - - -$ 82 70,025 74,575 74,325 81,576 86,050 94,650 97,150 2,500$ 83 84 IT Technology -$ 85 41951-201 Postage Shipping -$ 86 41951-207 Computer / Supplies 25,550 27,500 28,500 24,500 28,000 35,000 45,500 10,500$ Annual License Renewals; Watchguard Total City Council Total Elections Total Newsletter & Web Total Assessor Total Auditor Total City Attorney Total City Charter Total Other Government Total City Hall Operating 1 1 CITY OF CORCORAN Draft September 9, 2021 2 2021 Rev 2 3 OSA LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2016 BUDGET 2017 BUDGET 2018 BUDGET 2019 BUDGET 2020 BUDGET 2021 BUDGET 2022 Budget BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2021/2022 87 41951-210 Operating Supplies 1,500 9,725 10,000 10,000 11,000 15,000 16,000 1,000$ Additional copier lease 88 41951-300 Professional Supplies 21,500 26,200 30,000 52,500 75,000 85,000 95,000 10,000$ Managed Services; $5,000 increase for Watchguard (body cameras) 89 41951-530 Facility Assets 6,500 11,500 8,000 9,000 9,000 12,000 20,000 8,000$ Additional computers for new staff 90 55,050 74,925 76,500 96,000 123,000 147,000 176,500 29,500$ 91 92 Engineering -$ 93 43170-260 Comprehensive Plan -$ 94 -$ 95 43170-299 Watershed LGU - - - 10,000 7,500 10,000 10,000 -$ LGU wetland services. 96 43170-300 Professional Services 47,500 31,250 22,500 22,500 25,000 35,000 50,000 15,000$ Increased demand from projects 97 47,500 31,250 22,500 32,500 32,500 45,000 60,000 15,000$ 98 99 Fire -$ 100 42200-300 Professional Services 281,000 298,700 328,113 348,500 367,000 383,100 427,000 43,900$ Projected contract increases 101 42200-550 Motor Vehicles - -$ 102 42200-580 Safety Inspections - 10,000 10,000 -$ New education/inspection program 103 281,000 298,700 328,113 348,500 367,000 393,100 437,000 43,900$ 104 105 Building Inspections -$ 106 42400-300 Professional Services 74,000 110,000 117,000 157,250 166,500 402,000 470,000 68,000$ 230 new home permits - Metro West only 107 42400-437 Surcharges 11,000 12,500 13,000 12,750 13,500 24,500 39,000 14,500$ State of MN only 108 85,000 122,500 130,000 170,000 180,000 426,500 509,000 82,500$ 109 110 Recycling -$ 111 43232-210 Operating Supplies - 3,000 3,000 4,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 -$ 112 43232-300 Professional Services 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,300 8,300 9,000 10,000 1,000$ Provider to Managing Billing/Balance City Subsidy. 113 6,000 9,000 9,000 10,300 11,800 12,500 13,500 1,000$ 114 115 788,855 866,880 905,493 1,020,885 1,103,406 1,455,385 1,672,385 217,000$ 116 117 City Administrator -$ 118 41300-100 Wages & Salaries 99,757 102,658 109,990 $112,195 $128,752 $134,888 $138,944 4,056$ 119 41300-121 PERA 7,482 7,699 8,249 8,415 9,656 10,117 10,421 304$ 120 41300-122 FICA / SS 6,185 6,365 6,819 6,956 7,983 8,363 8,615 252$ 121 41300-126 Medicare 1,446 1,489 1,595 1,627 1,867 1,956 2,015 59$ 122 41300-130 Employer Paid FSA - -$ 123 41300-131 Employer Paid Health 17,643 15,409 15,983 16,721 19,487 20,407 22,448 2,041$ Life, A/D, LTD, STD, FSA/HSA, Health 124 41300-132 Medical Cafeteria Plan -$ 125 41300-133 Employer Paid HSA -$ 126 41300-140 Unemployment Compensation -$ 127 41300-208 Training 4,000 4,350 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,500 5,500 -$ 128 725$ MCMA Conference -$ 129 1,900$ ICMA Conference -$ 130 375$ LMC Conference -$ 131 800$ Leadership Growth Group -$ 132 200$ MAMA -$ 133 41300-210 Operating Supplies 700 800 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,200 200$ 134 41300-300 Professional Services -$ 135 41300-364 Workers' Compensation 600 570 510 536 771 810 750 (60)$ 136 41300-433 Dues & Memberships 1,000 1,000 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,400 1,400 -$ 137 111$ MN City/County Managers -$ 138 738$ ICMA -$ 139 138,813 140,340 149,946 153,750 175,816 184,441 $191,293 6,852$ 140 141 Administrative Staff -$ 142 41400-100 Wages & Salaries 168,640 174,918 192,055 221,689 260,181 273,442 401,643 128,201$ Full year of finance manager, new HR/Communications, new intern 143 41400-110 Overtime 1,000 200 500 - 2,500 5,000 - (5,000)$ 144 41400-121 PERA 12,723 13,134 13,710 16,627 19,515 20,508 30,123 9,615$ 145 41400-122 FICA / SS 10,518 10,857 11,938 13,745 16,132 16,953 24,902 7,949$ 146 41400-126 Medicare 2,460 2,539 2,792 3,214 3,773 3,965 5,824 1,859$ 147 41400-130 Employer Paid FSA -$ 148 41400-131 Employer Paid Health 52,928 46,228 50,707 53,196 64,369 75,479 115,007 39,528$ Life, A/D, LTD, STD, FSA/HSA, Health 149 41400-132 Medical Cafeteria -$ 150 41400-133 Employer Paid H S A -$ 151 41400-140 Unemployment Compensation -$ 152 41400-208 Training 4,000 4,000 4,500 5,500 11,550 12,000 11,000 (1,000)$ 153 41400-210 Operating Supplies 750 750 1,650 1,750 1,750 1,750 2,250 500$ Mileage, BYOD Policy. 154 41400-300 Professional Services 75,000 - (75,000)$ Full year of finance manager, new HR/Communications, new intern 155 41400-364 Workers' Compensation Insurance 1,400 2,275 1,600 1,680 2,071 2,205 2,205 -$ Total Fire Services Total Building Inspections Total IT Technology TOTAL CITY HALL Total City Administrator Total Recycling Total Engineering 2 1 CITY OF CORCORAN Draft September 9, 2021 2 2021 Rev 2 3 OSA LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2016 BUDGET 2017 BUDGET 2018 BUDGET 2019 BUDGET 2020 BUDGET 2021 BUDGET 2022 Budget BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2021/2022 156 41400-433 Dues & Memberships 500 500 1,000 1,050 1,150 1,250 1,750 500$ 157 254,919 255,401 280,452 318,451 382,991 487,552 594,704 107,152$ 158 159 Planning & Zoning -$ 160 41910-100 Wages & Salaries - - - - 37,662 71,240 98,859 27,619$ Full year new Planner position, new PT admin assistant 41910-121 PERA 2,825 5,343 7,414 2,071$ 161 41910-122 FICA / SS - - - - 2,335 4,417 6,129 1,712$ 162 41910-126 Medicare - - - - 546 1,033 1,433 400$ 41910-131 Employer Paid Health 11,367 8,884 8,884 -$ 163 41910-208 Training - - - - 500 1,500 1,500 -$ 164 41910-210 Operating Supplies 1,000 2,000 2,250 2,250 500 1,000 1,000 -$ Public Hearing Notices, Labels, Postage, Training. 165 41910-300 Professional Services 65,200 65,000 65,000 63,000 57,000 45,000 50,000 5,000$ Reduced consulting fees from adding a city planner. 166 41910-364 Workers' Compensation - - - - 129 370 407 37$ 167 66,200 67,000 67,250 65,250 112,864 138,787 175,626 36,839$ 168 169 Code Enforcement -$ 170 41920-100 Wages & Salaries 59,550 62,975 82,955 68,286 70,346 - -$ Moved to Public Works 171 41920-110 Overtime 1,000 500 1,000 1,000 250 - -$ 172 41920-121 PERA 4,541 4,761 5,097 5,196 5,351 - -$ 173 41920-122 FICA / SS 3,754 3,935 4,213 4,296 4,423 - -$ 174 41920-126 Medicare 878 920 985 1,005 1,035 - -$ 175 41920-130 FSA Employer -$ 176 41920-131 Health Insurance 17,643 15,409 15,983 7,754 8,474 - -$ 177 41920-140 Unemployment Compensation -$ 178 41920-208 Training 750 1,250 3,250 2,850 750 - -$ 179 41920-210 Operating Supplies 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,000 1,000 - -$ 180 41920-300 Professional Srvs - 45,500 30,000 30,000 20,000 (10,000)$ Contract Code Enforcement 181 41920-331 Vehicle Expense -$ 182 41920-344 Public Hearing Notices -$ 183 41920-364 Workers' Compensation 417 570 520 546 513 - -$ 184 41920-417 Uniform 250 250 250 250 250 - -$ 185 41920-433 Dues & Membership 100 250 250 250 150 - -$ 186 89,883 91,820 116,003 137,933 122,542 30,000 20,000 (10,000)$ 187 188 Employee Benefit Charges 189 43190-300 Professional Services -$ 190 - - - - - -$ 191 192 Transfers to/from Other Funds 193 41900-700 Transfer to other funds -$ 194 49360-720 Operating Transfers -$ 195 41900-700 Transfer to other funds 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000 200,000 300,000 100,000$ CIP 196 41900-700 Transfer to other funds 10,000 60,000 90,000 120,000 125,000 20,000 - (20,000)$ City Hall Remodel 197 41900-700 Transfer to other funds - - - 15,000 - 15,000 35,000 20,000$ Transfer to stormwater fund; FEMA mapping 198 41900-700 Transfer to other funds - - - - 62,000 - 25,000 25,000$ Transfer to facility fund 199 60,000 135,000 190,000 260,000 337,000 235,000 360,000 125,000$ 200 19 1,398,670 1,556,441 1,709,144 1,956,268 2,234,619 2,531,165 3,014,008 482,843$ 201 202 PUBLIC WORKS 203 PERSONNEL SERVICES 204 43100-100 Full-time - Regular 305,571 396,986 483,299 482,973 500,476 620,191 920,398 300,207$ New Development & Operations Supt.; New Admin Asst. 205 43100-110 Full-time - Overtime 20,000 24,000 23,000 28,000 30,000 39,000 50,000 11,000$ 3 year average 206 43100-121 PERA 24,418 31,574 38,047 38,323 39,786 49,439 72,780 23,341$ 207 43100-122 FICA / SS 20,185 26,101 31,453 31,680 32,890 40,870 60,165 19,295$ 208 43100-126 Medicare 4,721 6,104 7,356 7,409 7,692 9,558 14,071 4,513$ 209 43100-130 Employer Paid FSA -$ 210 43100-131 Employer Paid Health 88,213 97,592 118,776 117,785 122,829 147,536 223,434 75,898$ Life, A/D, LTD, STD, FSA/HSA, Health 211 43100-132 Medical Cafeteria -$ 212 43100-133 Employer Paid H S A -$ 213 43100-134 Employer Paid HRA -$ 214 43100-140 Unemployment Compensation - - -$ 215 43100-364 Workers' Compensation Insurance 19,000 17,100 16,000 18,000 7,476 8,700 9,200 500$ 216 43100-417 Uniforms 7,000 8,500 8,500 9,000 10,000 11,250 12,500 1,250$ 217 21 489,108 607,957 726,431 733,170 751,149 926,544 1,362,548 436,004$ 218 219 OPERATING EXPENSE 220 43100-200 Office Supplies 1,000 1,000 -$ Permit Technician needs Total Public Works Personnel Total Administrative Staff Total Planning & Zoning Total Code Enforcement Total Employee Benefit Chgs Total Administration Total Transfers to/from other funds 3 1 CITY OF CORCORAN Draft September 9, 2021 2 2021 Rev 2 3 OSA LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2016 BUDGET 2017 BUDGET 2018 BUDGET 2019 BUDGET 2020 BUDGET 2021 BUDGET 2022 Budget BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2021/2022 221 43100-208 Training and Instruction 4,000 6,000 8,000 6,000 4,500 7,250 7,500 250$ Grader training classes; addition of Permit Technician to PW 222 43100-210 Operating Supplies 25,000 27,500 28,100 28,100 30,000 30,000 37,500 7,500$ 3 year average 223 43100-212 Motor Fuels 38,000 33,000 26,000 28,000 29,000 35,000 40,000 5,000$ 3 year average 224 43100-220 Repair/ Main. Supplies 25,000 25,000 30,000 31,000 33,000 42,000 50,000 8,000$ 3 year average 225 43100-223 Building Repair 6,500 8,000 8,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 -$ Maintenance service contracts, building maintenance costs. 226 43100-300 Professional Services 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 -$ Snow removal (Maple Grove) 227 43100-321 Telephone 8,000 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 -$ 228 43100-360 Insurance - -$ 229 43100-380 Utility services 28,000 14,500 15,000 19,000 20,000 20,000 21,000 1,000$ 230 43100-810 Refunds/Reimbursements -$ 231 43100-810 Refunds/Reimbursements - - - - - -$ 232 21 136,600 127,600 128,700 135,700 145,100 163,850 185,600 21,750$ 233 234 CITY OPERATING SERVICES 235 43100-222 Seal Coating 60,000 60,000 60,000 67,500 67,500 69,000 72,500 3,500$ 236 43100-225 Land Scape/Ditch Maintenance 10,000 10,000 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 22,500 5,000$ 237 43100-226 Sign Repair Material 6,000 6,100 6,100 6,100 6,500 7,000 7,500 500$ 238 43100-227 Crack Filling 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 -$ 239 43100-228 Dust Control 115,000 100,000 100,000 95,000 100,000 110,000 125,000 15,000$ Price increase 240 43100-229 Culverts 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 15,000 17,500 2,500$ 2022 project needs 241 43100-230 MSA Expense -$ 242 43100-231 Drain Tile -$ 243 43100-232 Gravel 130,000 140,000 140,000 147,500 147,500 152,500 172,500 20,000$ Price increase 244 43100-233 Asphalt/Maintenance patching 150,000 165,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 175,000 185,000 10,000$ 245 43100-381 Signal Lights/street lights 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 -$ 246 21 495,000 505,100 510,100 522,600 538,500 566,000 622,500 56,500$ 247 248 PARKS PERSONNEL SERVICES 249 45200-100 Wages and Salaries 40,182 41,096 41,790 55,404 93,122 103,052 119,426 16,374$ New PT Program Coordinator 250 45200-110 Overtime - - - - - - -$ 251 45200-121 PERA - - - 2,106 3,787 4,494 4,912 418$ 252 45200-122 FICA / SS 2,491 2,548 2,591 3,435 5,774 6,389 7,404 1,015$ 253 45200-126 Medicare 583 596 606 803 1,350 1,494 1,732 238$ 254 45200-130 Employer Paid FSA -$ 255 45200-131 Employer Paid Health 15,511 17,332 19,065 1,733$ 256 45200-208 Training 325 325 350 400 50$ MRPA Conference, other trainings 257 45200-433 Dues and Memberships 380 380 400 500 100$ MRPA/NRPA 258 45200-364 Workers' Compensation Insurance 2,250 5,671 5,000 3,000 9,719 10,200 10,500 300$ 259 45,506 49,911 49,987 65,453 129,968 143,711 163,939 20,228$ 260 261 PARKS OPERATING EXPENSES 262 45200-210 Operating Supplies 15,500 16,500 16,500 47,000 22,125 25,000 27,500 2,500$ 263 45200-220 Repair/ Main. Supplies - -$ 264 45200-221 Maintenance Project 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 30,000 10,000$ 265 45200-300 Professional Services - 5,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 -$ 266 45200-261 Recreation Programming - - - - 26,000 25,500 40,400 14,900$ Replacement equipment, increased supply costs 267 45200-321 Telephone 700 700 700 700 700 750 800 50$ 268 45200-380 Utility services 7,000 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 -$ 269 45200-530 Improvements Other than Bldg.37,302 37,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 -$ NW Trails Snowmobile Expense Pass Through Funds Only 100-45200-33422. 270 45200-810 Refunds/Reimbursements -$ 271 45200-810 Refunds/Reimbursements -$ 272 75,502 74,700 77,700 105,700 106,825 119,250 146,700 27,450$ 273 274 25 121,008 124,611 127,687 171,153 236,793 262,961 310,639 47,678$ 275 276 Ice & Snow Removal 277 43125-210 Snow and Ice Removal 30,000 30,000 30,000 36,000 40,500 50,500 53,000 2,500$ Salt and Sand - price increase in state contract and additional streets. 278 21 30,000 30,000 30,000 36,000 40,500 50,500 53,000 2,500$ 279 280 1,271,716 1,395,268 1,522,918 1,598,623 1,712,042 1,969,855 2,534,287 564,432$ 281 282 POLICE 283 PERSONNEL SERVICES 284 POLICE 285 42100-100 Wages and Salaries 552,886 603,583 662,825 736,880 $760,846 $866,731 $959,398 92,667$ Sergeant added; FT Admin. Asst. 286 42100-110 Overtime 10,450 11,400 14,400 20,000 23,000 26,286 29,572 3,286$ 287 42100-111 Overtime Events 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 (12,000)$ Pass Through Funds only 100-42100-34201/33620. Total Public Works City Operating Services TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS & PARKS Total Snow & Ice Total Parks Total Parks Personnel Total Parks Operating Expense Total Public Works Operating Expense 4 1 CITY OF CORCORAN Draft September 9, 2021 2 2021 Rev 2 3 OSA LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2016 BUDGET 2017 BUDGET 2018 BUDGET 2019 BUDGET 2020 BUDGET 2021 BUDGET 2022 Budget BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2021/2022 288 42100-121 PERA 89,568 99,627 104,607 126,833 $136,552 $155,811 $172,757 16,946$ 289 42100-122 FICA / SS - - -$ 290 42100-126 Medicare 8,168 8,917 9,363 10,850 $11,366 $12,949 $14,345 1,396$ 291 42100-130 Employer Paid FSA -$ 292 42100-131 Employer Paid Health 123,498 123,276 136,501 151,227 $154,105 $185,621 $235,249 49,628$ Additional staff; $12,000 PERA Disability Requirement 293 42100-132 Medical Cafeteria -$ 294 42100-133 Employer Paid H S A -$ 295 42100-134 Employer Paid HRA -$ 296 42100-364 Workers' Compensation 25,000 32,712 28,000 32,000 45,414 47,600 48,000 400$ 297 821,570 891,515 967,696 1,089,790 1,143,283 1,306,998 $1,459,321 152,323$ 298 299 PART TIME 300 42101-100 Wages and Salaries 61,000 53,560 40,602 41,969 50,003 85,011 119,020 34,009$ Increased PT officer wage, increased CSO hours 301 42101-110 Overtime - -$ 302 42101-111 Overtime Events 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 -$ Pass Through Funds Only 100-42100-34201 303 42101-121 PERA 1,100 6,074 7,779 4,979 8,289 11,955 21,067 9,112$ 304 42101-122 FICA / SS 3,000 996 1,276 2,169 3,100 5,271 4,483 (788)$ 305 42101-126 Medicare 890 777 995 $1,015 $725 $1,233 $1,726 493$ 306 42101-140 Unemployment Comp -$ 307 70,990 66,407 55,652 55,132 67,118 108,470 151,296 42,826$ 308 309 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 310 42102-100 Wages and Salaries 50,237 61,583 77,501 79,040 86,928 93,854 125,212 31,358$ Increase PT position to full-time 311 42102-110 Overtime 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 -$ 312 42102-121 PERA 3,805 4,656 5,850 5,966 6,557 7,077 9,428 2,351$ 313 42102-122 FICA / SS 3,146 3,849 4,836 4,931 5,421 5,850 7,794 1,944$ 314 42102-126 Medicare 736 900 1,131 1,153 1,268 1,368 1,823 455$ 315 42102-130 Employer Paid FSA -$ 316 42102-131 Employer Paid Health 17,643 15,409 15,983 16,721 16,921 18,613 38,131 19,518$ 317 42102-132 Medical Cafeteria -$ 318 76,067 86,897 105,801 108,311 117,595 127,262 182,888 55,626$ 319 320 SUPPLIES 321 42100-200 Office Supplies 5,000 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 -$ 322 42100-201 Postage 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 -$ 323 42100-208 Training Classes and Supplies 16,800 16,800 23,400 22,000 24,900 26,400 28,900 2,500$ Lexipol, Driving School, Training Mandates. 324 42100-209 Police Reserves Equipment 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 -$ 325 42100-210 Operating Supplies 9,000 9,000 10,000 12,500 18,000 18,000 18,000 -$ 326 42100-212 Motor Fuels 32,000 25,000 21,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 -$ 327 42100-218 Investigations 350 5,350 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 -$ 328 42100-417 Clothing and Uniforms 11,000 11,000 11,000 12,000 12,000 14,000 19,000 5,000$ Additional officers 329 42100-433 Dues and Memberships 1,500 1,600 1,600 1,800 1,800 2,300 2,800 500$ 330 42100-810 Refunds/Reimbursements - - - - - -$ 331 79,400 76,100 74,850 78,650 87,050 91,050 99,050 8,000$ 332 333 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 334 42100-220 Maintenance - Motor Vehicle 8,000 8,000 8,000 9,500 9,500 12,500 15,700 3,200$ CSO fleet addition 335 42100-223 Building Maintenance and Repairs 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 6,500 7,500 1,000$ Increased repairs needed 336 42100-300 Professional Services 1,500 1,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 6,200 20,400 14,200$ Leads online; DeleteMe Online Protection; annual audits; embedded social worker 337 42100-301 Prisoner - Professional Fees 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6,000 (2,000)$ 338 42100-304 Legal Services 27,500 27,500 27,500 27,500 27,500 27,500 25,500 (2,000)$ 339 42100-321 Telephone 7,200 7,200 7,700 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 -$ 340 42100-323 Radio Units 16,900 16,900 17,500 17,500 18,500 20,000 21,500 1,500$ 341 42100-380 Utility Services / Civil Defense/Emergency Management 4,000 4,000 9,000 8,000 9,500 9,500 9,500 -$ Siren Maintenance, Emergency Management, Code Red, EM Training & Equip. 342 76,600 76,600 84,200 86,500 89,000 99,700 115,600 15,900$ 343 344 20 1,124,627 1,197,519 1,288,199 1,418,383 1,504,046 1,733,480 2,008,155 274,675$ 345 346 347 3,795,013 4,149,228 4,520,261 4,973,274 5,450,706 6,234,500 7,556,450 1,321,950$ 348 349 Debt Service 350 Equipment Certificate Fund 351 352 353 Disbursements Total Contractual Services Total Police Personnel Services Total Police Supplies Total Police Administration Total Part Time COMBINED DEPARTMENT TOTAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL POLICE 5 1 CITY OF CORCORAN Draft September 9, 2021 2 2021 Rev 2 3 OSA LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2016 BUDGET 2017 BUDGET 2018 BUDGET 2019 BUDGET 2020 BUDGET 2021 BUDGET 2022 Budget BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2021/2022 354 Equipment Certificate 355 Fiscal Agent Fees / Issuing Fees 356 Principal 357 Principal & Interest-2008 99,614 104,882 - - - - -$ 358 Principal & Interest-2010 61,460 62,812 191,549 - - - -$ 359 Principal & Interest-2012 44,035 45,964 45,438 44,914 44,389 48,904 - (48,904)$ Pay as cash in 2021 to remove $48,077 scheduled bond payment 360 Principal & Interest-2014 50,601 53,419 52,647 52,916 52,878 -$ Council direction to call bonds early and pay off in 2020 361 Principal & Interest-2016 Equip 37,590 36,960 36,330 36,015 35,385 39,690 4,305$ 362 Principal & Interest-2018 Equip 81,900 80,010 79,065 81,323 2,258$ 363 Principal & Interest-2018 Debt Service 39,454 37,406 36,304 32,996 (3,308)$ 364 Principal & Interest-2018 Abatement 68,250 73,500 73,500 78,750 5,250$ Principal & Interest-2020 Equip 100,905 104,475 3,570$ 365 Total Principal & Interest 255,710 304,667 326,594 323,764 324,198 374,063 337,234 (36,829)$ 366 Required 5% overage 12,786 - 367 Total 268,496 304,667 326,594 323,764 324,198 374,063 337,234 (36,829)$ 368 369 Revenues 370 CIP Debt Levy 371 Interest 372 Sales of Assets 373 Bond Proceeds 374 Total - - - - - - 375 376 Facility Expansion (PD) #307 & #407 377 Project Costs 378 Principal 379 Principal & Interest - 380 Required 5% Overage - 381 Total - - - - - - 382 383 Facility Expansion (Public Works) 2012B 384 Principal & Interest 137,688 185,312 168,039 229,044 231,617 223,523 222,485 (1,038)$ 385 Required 5% Overage 6,884 - -$ 386 Total 144,572 185,312 168,039 229,044 231,617 223,523 222,485 (1,038)$ 387 388 Equipment Certificate Fund # 309 & 416 389 2012 Certificates 390 Principal & Interest - - - - - 391 Required 5% overage - - - - - 392 Total - - - - - - 393 394 COMBINED DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES 413,068 489,979 494,633 552,808 555,815 597,586 559,719 (37,867)$ 395 396 REVENUES 2016 BUDGET 2017 BUDGET 2018 BUDGET 2019 BUDGET 2020 BUDGET 2021 BUDGET 2022 BUDGET 397 GENERAL FUND REVENUE 398 399 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 400 3 41900-31810 Cable Franchise Fee 40,000 43,000 45,000 53,000 53,000 53,000 53,000 -$ 401 5 41900-32110 Liquor Licenses Fees 18,250 18,250 18,375 18,375 18,375 19,000 16,000 (3,000)$ One Less Licensee 402 41900-33402 Homestead Credit - - - - - -$ 403 41900-33403 Mobile Homestead Credit - - - - - -$ 404 7 41900-33420 AG Preserve Credit 5,000 5,000 5,000 12,000 12,000 10,000 10,000 -$ 405 7 41900-33421 PERA State Aid 1,845 1,845 1,845 1,845 1,845 1,845 1,845 -$ 406 7 41900-33422 Other Grants and Aid 3,000 - -$ Election aid. 407 41900-34000 Charges for Services - -$ 408 10 41900-34103 Zoning / Subdivision Fees 12,000 25,000 25,000 35,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 -$ 409 10 41900-34105 Copies / Maps 150 150 150 150 150 100 100 -$ 410 10 41900-34107 Assessment Search 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 -$ 411 10 41900-34108 TIF Administrative Fees 8,000 - - - - -$ 412 41900-34110 Escrow Administrative Fees - - - - - -$ 413 10 41900-34405 Clean up day Income 675 1,500 1,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,250 250$ 414 13 41900-36200 Miscellaneous Revenue 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 -$ 415 12 41900-36210 Interest Earnings 2,000 1,000 1,500 15,000 16,500 16,500 8,000 (8,500)$ 416 13 41900-36217 Sale of Assets - - - - - -$ 417 13 41900-36220 Rents / Royalties 9,840 10,800 10,800 11,620 11,620 7,000 7,000 -$ Crop Rentals 418 13 41900-36230 Donations 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 -$ 419 41900-36233 Refunds/Reimbursements -$ 6 1 CITY OF CORCORAN Draft September 9, 2021 2 2021 Rev 2 3 OSA LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2016 BUDGET 2017 BUDGET 2018 BUDGET 2019 BUDGET 2020 BUDGET 2021 BUDGET 2022 Budget BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2021/2022 420 CITY PLANNER 421 10 41910-36200 Miscellaneous Revenue - - - - 9,750 16,250 32,500 16,250$ Billable hours from city planner (10 hours per week * 50 weeks * $65.00 per hour) 422 CODE ENFORCEMENT 423 41920-32100 Business/License Fee - - - - - -$ 424 41920-34000 Charges for Services - - - - - -$ 425 CITY HALL OPERATIONS 426 41941-34100 General Government - - - - - -$ 427 10 41941-34101 Facility Rental 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,500 - - -$ No Longer Renting Due to Remodel 428 13 41941-36200 Miscellaneous Revenue 1,000 1,000 4,500 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 -$ 429 PUBLIC SAFETY 430 42100-32240 Animal Licenses - - - - - -$ 431 9 42100-33423 Police Town Aid 45,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 69,000 71,000 71,000 -$ 432 9 42100-33424 Police Training & POST 3,700 3,700 10,300 10,300 10,300 11,900 12,500 600$ 433 9 42100-33620 Other Grants and Aid/Safe & Sober 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 -$ Pass Through Only - Area Traffic Project (42100-111 & 42101-111). 434 5 42100-34200 Police Permits 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 -$ 435 10 42100-34201 Police Service Charge 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 5,000 5,000 -$ Pass Through Only - Contractual Events (42100-111 & 42101-111). 436 10 42100-34202 Police Reports / Misc. Fees 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 400 400 -$ 437 42100-34204 Police Training - - - - - -$ 438 11 42100-35101 Fines 45,000 45,000 45,000 50,000 60,000 45,000 40,000 (5,000)$ Reduced fines anticipated 439 42100-36200 Miscellaneous Revenue - - - - - -$ 440 42100-36230 Donations - - - - - -$ 441 42100-36233 Refunds/Reimbursements - - - - - -$ 442 BUILDING INSPECTION 443 5 42400-32210 Building Permit Fees 190,000 275,000 325,000 425,000 450,000 815,000 1,335,000 520,000$ 230 new home permits 444 PUBLIC WORKS 445 8 43100-33418 MSA Road Maint. Fund 120,000 124,000 124,000 135,000 135,000 170,000 150,000 (20,000)$ Revised MSA routes 446 10 43100-34300 Public Works Permits / Fees 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 5,500 5,000 (500)$ Revised with three-year average 447 10 43100-34301 Dust Control 57,500 47,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 - (37,500)$ No billing in 2022 448 43100-36100 Special Assessments - - - - - -$ 449 10 43100-36200 Miscellaneous Revenue - 8,125 25,000 34,600 40,500 42,000 88,200 46,200$ Billable Hours for Development Superintendent ($66,150) and Public Works Director ($22,050) 450 43100-36233 Refunds/Reimbursements - - - - - -$ 451 ICE & SNOW REMOVAL 452 13 43125-36200 Miscellaneous Revenue 8,000 8,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 -$ 453 Engineering 454 43170-32290 Watershed LGU Revenue - - - - - -$ 455 RECYCLING 456 9 43232-33610 County Recycling Grant 14,500 14,500 14,500 16,000 16,000 14,000 14,000 -$ 457 10 43232-34400 Recycling Income - 2,500 2,500 2,500 3,500 5,000 5,000 -$ Provider Managing Billing. 458 43232-36200 Miscellaneous Revenue - - - - - -$ 459 PARKS 460 9 45200-33422 Other State Grant 37,302 37,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 -$ Pass Through Only - Snowmobile Trail Grant. 461 10 45200-34101 Facility Rental 6,000 5,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,500 1,500 -$ 462 10 45200-36199 Recreation Programming - - - - 56,000 58,000 59,300 1,300$ Revenue from Recreation Programming. 463 13 45200-36200 Miscellaneous Revenue 8,000 58,000 500 - -$ Revenue from Recreation Programming moved into separate revenue account 464 45200-36230 Donations - - - - - -$ 465 45200-36233 Refunds/Reimbursements - - - - - -$ 466 TRANSFERS TO/FROM OTHER FUNDS 467 17 49360-39200 Transfer from Other Fund 61,901 162,122 192,871 205,830 218,872 269,164 359,677 90,513$ Utility funds 468 469 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES 720,713 923,042 1,030,391 1,263,270 1,345,962 1,786,709 2,387,322 600,613$ 470 471 41900-31020 Delinquent Property Taxes - - - - - -$ 472 41900-31040 Fiscal Disparities - - - - - -$ 473 41900-33422 Local Government Aid - - - - - -$ 474 41900-31100 General Property Taxes 3,074,300 3,226,186 3,489,870 3,710,129 4,104,744 4,447,791 5,169,128 721,337$ 475 476 1 TOTAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE 3,074,300 3,226,186 3,489,870 3,710,129 4,104,744 4,447,791 5,169,128 721,337$ 16.22% 477 478 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 3,795,013 4,149,228 4,520,261 4,973,399 5,450,706 6,234,500 7,556,450 1,321,950$ 479 480 30 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE TAX LEVY 413,068 489,979 494,633 552,808 555,815 597,586 559,719 (37,867)$ 481 482 TOTAL ALL REVENUES 4,208,081 4,639,207 5,014,894 5,526,207 6,006,521 6,832,086 8,116,169 1,284,084$ 483 484 TOTAL ALL EXPENSES 4,208,080 4,639,207 5,014,894 5,526,082 6,006,521 6,832,086 8,116,169 1,284,084$ 485 486 487 REVENUE - EXPENSE 0 0 (0) 125 (0) - - -$ 7 1 CITY OF CORCORAN Draft September 9, 2021 2 2021 Rev 2 3 OSA LINE ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE 2016 BUDGET 2017 BUDGET 2018 BUDGET 2019 BUDGET 2020 BUDGET 2021 BUDGET 2022 Budget BUDGET DIFFERENCE 2021/2022 488 489 490 491 492 493 40 TOTAL CERTIFIED LEVY (INCLUDES DEBT SERVICE)3,487,368 3,716,165 3,984,503 4,262,937 4,660,559 5,045,377 5,728,847 683,471$ 13.55% 494 495 TOTAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY 3,074,300 3,226,186 3,489,870 3,710,129 4,104,744 4,447,791 5,169,128 721,337$ 496 497 TOTAL PROPERTY TAX COLLECTED - - - - - - -$ 8 City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-107 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING PRELIMINARY PROPOSED TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2022 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran does hereby declare that the following sums of money be levied for the budget year 2022, collectible in 2022, for the following purposes: GENERAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY $5,169,128 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE DEBT 2016A $39,690 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE DEBT 2018A $81,323 DEBT SERVICE LEVY 2018A $32,996 ABATEMENT LEVY 2018A $78,750 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE DEBT 2020A $104,475 FACILITY EXPANSION DEBT - PUBLIC WORKS $222,485 FOR A TOTAL LEVY OF $ 5,728,847 FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the Council does hereby designate the following date for the Truth in Taxation Budget Meeting at which public comment is accepted on December 9, 2021 at 7:00 pm at Corcoran City Hall, 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September, 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City Seal STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7e. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: 2022 Proposed Levies and Taxes Insert Action Required: Approval Summary: Agenda item 7d. is the approval of the preliminary levy which will be used to send out property specific notices in November showing proposed levies and taxes. The City of Corcoran has an option to include an additional insert along with those notices if it wishes, for a fee. Attached to this report is a draft insert. It is requested that the Council provide feedback on the draft and consider directing staff to move forward with the opportunity. The insert must be received by Hennepin County by September 30th. Financial/Budget: Hennepin County charges cities for the opportunity. The estimated cost is $1,000. Options: 1. Authorize staff to submit the insert to Hennepin County and incur the costs associated with the project. 2. Decline the opportunity. Recommendation Authorize staff to submit the insert to Hennepin County and incur the costs associated with the project. Council Action: Consider a motion to authorize staff to submit the insert to Hennepin County and incur the costs associated with the project. Attachments: 1. Draft Insert 2022 PROPOSED BUDGET AND LEVY The City Council adopted its preliminary levy for 2022 at the September 23rd meeting. This levy amount may be decreased prior to final approval but not increased. This levy amount was used to create the proposed City tax amount within the proposed 2022 levies and taxes notice. TAX EFFECTS The adopted preliminary levy is in the amount of $5,728,847 which is a $683,470 or 13.55% increase from the 2021 levy. Despite this increase, the projected tax rate change is slightly reduced from 43.522% to 43.168% due to new construction. As the City of Corcoran grows it will often be the case to see higher percentage overall levy increases in order to provide services in new developments. However, it is the goal of the Council to continue to lower the overall tax rate year after year, and this goal has been accomplished for the fifth year in a row. A reduced tax rate means properties with no change in value would see a slight decrease in City taxes. Properties with valuation increases may see an increase. According to the City Assessor, the following average increases took place in Corcoran: Residential: 3.9% Agricultural: -6.2% Commercial: 0.8% Industrial: 5.5% Using this information, a home previously valued at $400,000 would now be valued at $415,600. The anticipated tax impact in this example would be as follows: Corcoran Tax capacity by property type: Residential: 83% Agricultural/Rural: 9% Commercial/Industrial: 8% Home Value Tax Capacity Tax Rate City Tax 2021 $400,000 $3,987.60 43.522% $1,735.48 2022 $415,600 $4,156.00 43.168% $1,794.06 WHY IS A PROPERTY TAX NEEDED? Only a small portion of the City budget is funded through fees or charges for services. For 2022 the portion proposed to be funded by fees or charges covers 29% of our expenditures. The remaining 71% is funded through the property tax levy. 763/420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 June: Council provided staff direction on priorities for the 2022 budget June—July Staff develops budget August 12: Council reviewed the first draft of the budget and provided staff direction September 9: Council reviewed the second draft of the budget September 23: Council adopted the preliminary levy November: Hennepin County mails Truth-in-Taxation notices showing proposed levies and taxes December 9: Council holds Truth-in-Taxation Budget Meeting accepting public comment December 9: Council considers approving the 2022 final budget and levy BUDGET PROCESS TIMELINE Item Annual Cost Cost Per Month Administration $438 $37 Planning/Engineering $52 $4 Public Works/Parks $560 $47 Police $444 $37 Fire $97 $8 Transfers/Debt Service $203 $17 TOTAL $1,794 $150 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763/420-2288 www.corcoranmn.gov The City Council will continue to refine the budget and levy prior to final approval which is anticipated on December 9. Between now and that time, the levy can decrease but not increase. A L L O C A T I O N O F TA X D O L L A R S The median estimated market value of a home in Corcoran is $415,600. The City taxes on a home of that value using the projected tax rate is $1,794 per year or about $150 per month. The chart below shows where the $1,794 is allocated based upon the overall percentage of City expenditures. (Amounts are rounded) N E X T S T E P Truth-in-Taxation Budget Meeting Meeting Format To Be Determined Thursday, December 9, 7:00 pm Learn More... The entire budget and related staff reports are available on the City’s website at www.corcoranmn.gov. Under the Our Government tab click Council then Agenda Packets then 2021. Select the 2021-9-23 Council Agenda Packet to view the budget used to set the preliminary levy. City Administrator Brad Martens, can also be reached at bmartens@corcoranmn.gov or 763-400-7030 for further questions. Prepared by the City of Corcoran Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7f. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Natalie Davis Topic: Sign Ordinance Update Action Required: Approval Summary: At the City Council meeting on August 26, 2021, staff proposed changes to how Construction Signs are handled in the Sign Code going forward. The City Council gave the direction to proceed with the ordinance update as proposed. One change from the proposal viewed on August 26th is the proposed removal of the term “Real Estate Sign” in the applicable definitions. The Sign Code currently defines “Real Estate Sign” as: “A temporary sign advertising the open house, sale, lease, or rental of the property or premises upon which it is located.” This phrase is not included anywhere else in the Sign Code, and such signs are currently treated the same as any other temporary sign. This would remain the case even with the term of art removed from City Code. Staff believes calling out “Real Estate Sign” with the above definition could lead to confusion with the newly added term “Construction Sign,” as construction signs may also advertise available lots for purchase. A public hearing is not required for this update since the Sign Code is separate from the Zoning Code. A simple majority is required to approve the proposed Ordinance and Resolution with Findings of Fact, while a 4/5 majority is required to approve the proposed Summary Ordinance. Recommendation: Move to adopt the following: a. Ordinance 2021-434 Approving Ordinance Amendment b. Resolution 2021-106 Approving Findings of Fact for Ordinance Amendment c. Summary Ordinance 2021-435 for Summary Publication Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2021-434 Amending the Text of Chapter 84 of the Corcoran City Code 2. Resolution 2021-106 Approving Findings of Fact for an Ordinance Amending the Text of Chapter 84 of the Corcoran City Code 3. Ordinance 2021-435 Summarizing Ordinance 2021-434 for Publication City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September 23, 2021 ORDINANCE NO. 2021-434 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 84 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGN PROVISIONS (CITY FILE 21-027) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 84.02 of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by removing the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: 84.02: DEFINITIONS Construction Sign – A temporary sign placed at a construction site which may possibly include components such as identifying the project or the name of the architect, engineer, contractor, developer, financier, other involved parties, and construction site rules. Construction Site – A collective of any properties under construction for a residential, commercial, or industrial development. Real Estate Sign – A temporary sign advertising the open house, sale, lease, or rental of the property or premises upon which it is located. SECTION 2. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 84.06 of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by adding the underlined material as follows: 84.06: TEMPORARY SIGNS. Temporary use of portable or movable signs shall be allowed in addition to the sign limitations of this ordinance. 1. General Provisions. All temporary signs, with the exception of construction signs, shall comply with the following standards: a) Temporary signs shall comply with Section 84.04 (General Provisions). b) Such signs shall be limited to a maximum of 32 square feet in area. c) A permit shall be obtained from the Code Compliance Official for each location and time period for placement of such signs, except: City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September 23, 2021 ORDINANCE NO. 2021-434 Page 2 of 3 i. Such signs shall comply with the duration limits of this Section. ii. A permit for temporary signs under 8 square feet in area shall not be required to obtain a permit provided that the posting date of the sign is legibly and permanently printed on the sign. iii. Farm stands in any district are permitted to display a temporary sign less than 16 square feet in area during the period of sales. Temporary commercial signs shall advertise an activity on the property on which they are located. d) Temporary commercial signs shall advertise an activity on the property on which they are located. e) All pennants, streamers, banners, and other forms of temporary signs must be maintained and not be frayed, torn, or tattered. f) Manually activated changeable message boards are permitted on temporary freestanding signs. g) Sandwich board and A-frame signs must be placed on the property where the business is located and within 10 feet of the primary entrance of the business or on the right-of-way in front of property. A-frame signs must provide an unobstructed sidewalk width of at least 5 feet for pedestrian passage and must not interfere with pedestrian traffic or violate standards of accessibility as required by the ADA or other accessibility codes. h) Temporary signs may be located on a property for continuous periods not to exceed 30 days. No more than 1 such sign will be allowed per parcel. i) No property shall be allowed more than 4 such periods in any 12-month period. 2. Construction Sign Provisions. Construction signs shall comply with the following standards: a) Construction signs shall comply with Section 84.04 (General Provisions). b) Each construction site will be allowed up to two signs, each limited to a maximum of 32 square feet in area. c) A permit shall be obtained from the Code Compliance Official, or his/her designee, for placement of each such sign, except signs under 8 square feet in area shall not be required to obtain a permit but shall be subject to the two-sign limit. City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September 23, 2021 ORDINANCE NO. 2021-434 Page 3 of 3 d) Construction signs must be located on the construction site’s primary entrance to the development. e) Construction signs can be located on the construction site until: i. 90% of the building permits for a residential development have been issued. ii. A certificate of occupancy has been issued for a commercial or industrial development. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 23rd day of September 2021. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-106 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 84 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 21-027) WHEREAS, the Corcoran City Council has proposed an amendment to Chapter 84 (Signs) to allow a separate set of provisions for the treratment of temporary construction signs; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards and City policies; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, that it does approve an amendment to Chapter 84 (Signs) of the City Code to amend outside storage regulations, based on the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment would reduce the burden of the temporary sign time limit of 30 days, up to four times a year, for sites of multi-phase developments and long-term construction. 2. The proposed amendment would reduce the burden of a one-sign limit at construction sites where additional information may be appropriate at the entrance of the site. 3. The proposed amendment would reduce the number of City Code violations related to signs at construction sites. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-106 Page 2 of 2 ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-435 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2021-434 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 84 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGN PROVISIONS (CITY FILE 20-027) The text of Chapter 84 of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by revise definitions and provisions for temporary construction signs. A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7g. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens; Kevin Mattson Topic: Call Assessment Hearings – Appaloosa Woods and Corcoran Trail East/West Improvement Projects Action Required: Approval Summary: The City Council approved two street improvement projects: 1. Appaloosa Woods Street Improvements Project a. Project is complete. 2. Corcoran Trail East/West Improvements Project a. Bid awarded; project to be completed this fall Staff recommends calling assessment hearings for the October 14, 2021 meeting as costs are known for the Appaloosa Woods project and costs for the Corcoran Trail East/West project far exceed the amount to be assessed. This means that the assessable amount for both projects are known. Updated assessment rolls for each improvement project have been included. As a result of the Appaloosa Woods Street Improvements project coming in under budget and lower than the total preliminary assessed benefit value, staff recommends lowering the assessed value equally across all benefited properties. Attached to this report are resolutions declaring costs and calling for assessment hearings. It is requested the Council approve the resolutions as presented. Financial/Budget: Project costs are financed through the 2021 general fund budget, Asphalt Fund, Stormwater Fund, and special assessments. Council Action: Approve resolutions declaring costs and calling assessment hearings. Attachments: 1. Assessment Roll – Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement 2. Assessment Roll – Corcoran Trail East/West Improvement 3. Resolution 2021-108 - Declaring Cost for the Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Project 4. Resolution 2021-109 - Calling the Assessment Hearing for the Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Project 5. Resolution 2021-110 - Declaring Cost for the Corcoran Trail East/West Street Improvement Project Page 2 6. Resolution 2021-111 - Calling the Assessment Hearing for the Corcoran Trail East/West Improvement Project Project Cost 148,791.42$ PID PROPERTY ADDRESS TAX PAYER ADDRESSTAXPAYER NAMEUnits Assessment Amount241192313000219340 81st Place N 19340 81st Place NJ R Laxen & M L Simon1 11,346.55$ 241192313000319360 81st Place N 19360 81st Place NShelby Ann Burgess1 11,346.55$ 241192313000419263 81st Place N 19263 81st Place NS J Fraasch & N J S Fraasch1 11,346.55$ 241192314001519233 81st Place N 19233 81st Place NSulaine Marie Pedersen1 11,346.55$ 241192314001619223 81st Place N 19223 81st Place NDale M Hiebert1 11,346.55$ 241192314001719203 81st Place N 19203 81st Place ND & R Arntson1 11,346.55$ 241192314001819165 81st Place N 19165 81st Place NP J Dorn & A A Dorn1 11,346.55$ 241192314003119125 81st Place N 19125 81st Place NA M Gadalla/I E Siebenschuh1 11,346.55$ 24119234100038035 Ridge Court N 8035 Ridge Court NSteve Powers & Carrie Powers1 5,046.56$ 24119234100048025 Ridge Court N 16369 69th Place NJonathan T Friese Et Al1 5,046.56$ 24119234100068040 Ridge Court N 8040 Ridge Court NDavid Mcstott & Judy Mcstott1 5,046.56$ 241192314002019105 81st Place N 19105 81st Place NLeon M & Maria S Ramminger1 5,046.56$ 241192314000419140 81st Place N 19140 81st Place NJ & P Peterson1 5,046.56$ 241192314002719114 81st Place N 19114 81st Place NR A & M A M Riemer1 5,046.56$ 241192314002619138 81st Place N 19138 81st Place NRoman Svistun1 11,346.55$ 241192314002519180 81st Place N 19180 81st Place NMary Judith Phillips1 11,346.55$ 241192314000919260 81st Place N 19260 81st Place NJ D & B A Armbruster1 5,046.56$ Denotes properties from existing pavement to existing pavementAppaloosa Woods ‐ Street ImprovementsAssessment Roll Lot Equivilency Estimated Roadway Project Cost 590,438.35$ Lot Equivilency PID PROPERTY ADDRESS TAX PAYER ADDRESS TAXPAYER NAME Units Estimated Roadway Assessment Amount Overlay Credit Estimated Total Assessment Amount 2311923330002 7715 Corcoran Tr W 7715 Corcoran Tr W Lori K LeighChannon Hale Leigh 1 10,800.00$ -$ 10,800.00$ 2311923330003 7735 Corcoran Tr W 7735 Corcoran Tr W Harold R Hawkins 1 10,800.00$ -$ 10,800.00$ 2311923330004 7755 Corcoran Tr W 7755 Corcoran Tr W Brian & Evelyn Johnson 1 10,800.00$ -$ 10,800.00$ 2311923330014 7785 Corcoran Tr W 7785 Corcoran Tr W John W Herou/Michelle Herou 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923330015 7795 Corcoran Tr W 7795 Corcoran Tr W Bradley D PaumenBrian T Paumen 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923330016 7815 Corcoran Tr W 7815 Corcoran Tr W Brian Toussaint 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320002 7915 Corcoran Tr W 7915 Corcoran Tr W Barbara A PearsonBradley F Pearson 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320003 8015 Corcoran Tr W 8015 Corcoran Tr W Randal Donnell/Sarah Donnell 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320004 8055 Corcoran Tr W 8055 Corcoran Tr W Floyd Raymond Keen Jr 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320005 8075 Corcoran Tr W 8075 Corcoran Tr W Curtis & Amy Nelson 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320006 8070 Corcoran Tr E 8070 Corcoran Tr E Cody Ellos & Laura Ellos 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320007 8010 Corcoran Tr E 8010 Corcoran Tr E Pamela & Steven Scheiller 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320008 7950 Corcoran Tr E 7950 Corcoran Tr E Douglas Eli & Leah Robideau 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320009 7900 Corcoran Tr E 7900 Corcoran Tr E Thomas J & Karen E Boerner 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923330017 7800 Corcoran Tr E 7800 Corcoran Tr E Bemjamin W KorrerStephanie A Korrer 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923330018 7790 Corcoran Tr E 7790 Corcoran Tr E Pat A Tabor/Jody A Mills 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923330019 7780 Corcoran Tr E 7780 Corcoran Tr E S J Patnode & M Nelson 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923330020 7770 Corcoran Tr E 7770 Corcoran Tr E Pat Riley GormanStacy Ann Gorman 1 10,800.00$ -$ 10,800.00$ 2311923330010 7760 Corcoran Tr E 7760 Corcoran Tr E R L Eastborne 1 10,800.00$ -$ 10,800.00$ 2311923330009 7720 Corcoran Tr E 7720 Corcoran Tr E Brian Toussaint 1 10,800.00$ -$ 10,800.00$ 2311923330013 7710 Corcoran Tr W 7710 Corcoran Tr W Molly Gabriele 1 10,800.00$ -$ 10,800.00$ 2311923330006 7730 Corcoran Tr W 7730 Corcoran Tr W Keith Drake & Elise Drake 1 10,800.00$ -$ 10,800.00$ 2311923330021 7780 Corcoran Tr W 7780 Corcoran Tr W Curt D Propson 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923330022 7798 Corcoran Tr W 7798 Corcoran Tr W Chris Kuechle & Cher Kuechle 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320010 7888 Corcoran Tr W 7888 Corcoran Tr W Bruce A & Wendy A Koenen 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320011 8030 Corcoran Tr W 8030 Corcoran Tr W Loren George 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320012 7965 Corcoran Tr E 7965 Corcoran Tr E John & Lois Scheunemann 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923320013 7895 Corcoran Tr E 7895 Corcoran Tr E Joseph P StanislawskiGoodrun A Stanislawski 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923330023 7801 Corcoran Tr E 7801 Corcoran Tr E Daniel A WoodwardAliecia L O'Donnell 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923330024 7775 Corcoran Tr E 7775 Corcoran Tr E Andrew CarpenterDonna Carpenter 1 5,400.00$ (1,800.00)$ 3,600.00$ 2311923330007 7745 Corcoran Tr E 7745 Corcoran Tr E Jaclyn Pikkarainen 1 10,800.00$ -$ 10,800.00$ Corcoran Trail - Street Improvements Assessment Roll City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-108 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR THE APPALOOSA WOODS STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 429.061 the costs and expense incurred and to be incurred in making the improvements of the Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Project, have been calculated and so determined; and WHEREAS, the costs and expense have been calculated for the Appaloosa Woods Improvement Project, the improvement by reconstruction of the existing roadways of the following: • 81st Place from City of Corcoran Eastern Boundary to City of Corcoran Northern Boundary • 81st Place turnaround from 81st Place to End • Ridge Court from 81st Road to end of public roadway, approximately 30 feet; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost and expense incurred and to be incurred in making such improvements is the amount of $148,791.42; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes § 429.061, Subd. 1, provides that “[a]t any time after the expense incurred or to be incurred in making an improvement shall be calculated under the direction of the Council, the Council shall determine by resolution the amount of the total expense a municipality will pay, other than the amount, if any, which it will pay as a property owner and the amount to be specially assessed.”. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the city is hereby declared to be $0.00 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against the benefited property owners is declared to be $148,791.42. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before November 15th, and shall bear interest at the rate of 1.83 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he/she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his/her office for public inspection. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-108 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September, 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Project Cost 148,791.42$ PID PROPERTY ADDRESS TAX PAYER ADDRESSTAXPAYER NAMEUnits Assessment Amount241192313000219340 81st Place N 19340 81st Place NJ R Laxen & M L Simon1 11,346.55$ 241192313000319360 81st Place N 19360 81st Place NShelby Ann Burgess1 11,346.55$ 241192313000419263 81st Place N 19263 81st Place NS J Fraasch & N J S Fraasch1 11,346.55$ 241192314001519233 81st Place N 19233 81st Place NSulaine Marie Pedersen1 11,346.55$ 241192314001619223 81st Place N 19223 81st Place NDale M Hiebert1 11,346.55$ 241192314001719203 81st Place N 19203 81st Place ND & R Arntson1 11,346.55$ 241192314001819165 81st Place N 19165 81st Place NP J Dorn & A A Dorn1 11,346.55$ 241192314003119125 81st Place N 19125 81st Place NA M Gadalla/I E Siebenschuh1 11,346.55$ 24119234100038035 Ridge Court N 8035 Ridge Court NSteve Powers & Carrie Powers1 5,046.56$ 24119234100048025 Ridge Court N 16369 69th Place NJonathan T Friese Et Al1 5,046.56$ 24119234100068040 Ridge Court N 8040 Ridge Court NDavid Mcstott & Judy Mcstott1 5,046.56$ 241192314002019105 81st Place N 19105 81st Place NLeon M & Maria S Ramminger1 5,046.56$ 241192314000419140 81st Place N 19140 81st Place NJ & P Peterson1 5,046.56$ 241192314002719114 81st Place N 19114 81st Place NR A & M A M Riemer1 5,046.56$ 241192314002619138 81st Place N 19138 81st Place NRoman Svistun1 11,346.55$ 241192314002519180 81st Place N 19180 81st Place NMary Judith Phillips1 11,346.55$ 241192314000919260 81st Place N 19260 81st Place NJ D & B A Armbruster1 5,046.56$ Denotes properties from existing pavement to existing pavementAppaloosa Woods ‐ Street ImprovementsAssessment Roll Lot Equivilency City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-109 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR THE APPALOOSA WOODS STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the Corcoran City Council on April 13, 2020, ordered the preparation of a feasibility report by the City Engineer for the Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement project; and WHEREAS, on April 8, 2021, the City Council approved the feasibility report and scheduled the public improvement hearing for May 13, 2021; and WHEREAS, on May 13, 2021, the City Council held a public hearing, ordered the Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Project and directed the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications consistent with the ordered improvements, pursuant to resolution 2021-42. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Council hereby calls for an assessment hearing to be held on October 14, 2021 at 7:00 pm for the purposes of considering and adopting the project assessment roll. 2. The City Council hereby directs staff to mail official notice to the affected property owners to include the individual amounts of the proposed assessments. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September, 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-110 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CORCORAN TRAIL EAST/WEST IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 429.061 the costs and expense incurred and to be incurred in making the improvements of the Corcoran Trail East-West Improvement Project, have been calculated and so determined; and WHEREAS, the costs and expense have been calculated for the Corcoran Trail East/West Improvement Project, the improvement by reconstruction of the existing roadways of the following: • Corcoran Trail East and West to the respective connections with County Road 50; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost and expense incurred and to be incurred in making such improvements is the amount of $590,438.35; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes § 429.061, Subd. 1, provides that “[a]t any time after the expense incurred or to be incurred in making an improvement shall be calculated under the direction of the Council, the Council shall determine by resolution the amount of the total expense a municipality will pay, other than the amount, if any, which it will pay as a property owner and the amount to be specially assessed.”. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the city is estimated to be $414,038.35 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against the benefited property owners is declared to be $176,400. The City shall pay any additional costs beyond the assessed amount. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before November 15th, and shall bear interest at the rate of 1.83 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he/she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his/her office for public inspection. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-110 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September, 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-111 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR THE CORCORAN TRAIL EAST/WEST IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT WHEREAS, the Corcoran City Council on February 11, 2021, ordered the preparation of a feasibility report by the City Engineer for the Corcoran Trail East/West Improvements project; and WHEREAS, on May 13, 2021, the City Council approved the feasibility report and scheduled the public improvement hearing for June 10, 2021; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2021, the City Council held a public hearing, ordered the Corcoran Trail East/West Improvements project and directed the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications consistent with the ordered improvements, pursuant to resolution 2021-61. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Council hereby calls for an assessment hearing to be held on October 14, 2021 at 7:00 pm for the purposes of considering and adopting the project assessment roll. 2. The City Council hereby directs staff to mail official notice to the affected pr operty owners to include the individual amounts of the proposed assessments. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September, 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7h. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: City Hall Remodel –Change Order #7 Action Required: Approval Summary: Work continues on the City Hall remodel project with work nearing completion. Attached to this report is Change Order #7. Staff believes there will be one additional change order coming prior to project close out. Change order #7 1. This seventh change order is to increase the overall contract by $4,514.73 as outlined below: a. Automatic door closer work: $3,806.25 i. Existing door closers needed repairs to be functional per ADA compliance b. Police lobby countertop: $146.73 i. Install grommets for computer cords c. Button operators: $141.75 i. New buttons for handicap door operators d. Handicap door operator: $420.00 i. Change location of handicap door operator Financial/Budget: The additional costs have resulted in a projection that the remodel will go slightly above the original budget allocation. The current projection is an overage of $5,298 or 0.7%. Many of the additional items from change orders were unknowns which have been covered in our soft cost allocations. It is likely that one additional change order will be required prior to completion of the project. Budget Category Approved Amount Projected Amount 7/14/21 Construction $396,500 $446,556 Technology $120,000 $88,500 Furniture $120,000 $166,742 Soft Costs $90,000 $30,000 Total $726,500 $731,798 Council Action: Approve Change Order #7 for the City Hall remodel project. Attachments: 1. Change Order #7 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: September 13, 2021 for the September 23, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Plan for “Tavera 2nd Addition” (PID 35-119-23-44-0004 and 35-119-23-41-0001) (city file no. 21-036) REVIEW DEADLINE: October 18, 2021 1.Application Request The applicant, Lennar, has requested approval of the final plat and final PUD development plan for Tavera. This phase plats part of the former Wessel property (Outlot B) and the former Thies property, which was not in the original plat phase for 46 single family home lots and five outlots on 29.8 acres. The original approvals allowed grading of this portion of the site. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed the final PUD plan at their September 2, 2021 meeting and voted 4-0-1 (Lanterman abstained) to recommend approval of the request. There was no one present to speak on this item. 3.Background On June 25, 2020, The City Council approved the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for “Tavera”, a 549-unit a mix of single- family, villa, twinhome and townhome units. On January 25, 2021, Hennepin County approved lot division for the Wessel property. The lot split did not require City Council approval because lot splits that create parcels a minimum of 20 acres with 500 feet of frontage on a public street are exempt from subdivision by MN Statute. The split created two parcels and the proposed phase 1 development is on the northern parcel. On April 8, 2021, the Council approved phase 1 of the development for 33 single family home lots and three outlots. The new entrance off County Road 116 would be constructed with this initial phase. On July 22, 2021, the Council approved a PUD amendment to allow 551 homes and allow a modification to the temporary real estate time period. Agenda Item: 7i. Tavera 2nd Addition Final Plat and Final PUD Plan (city file 21-036) 2 September 23, 2021 4. Analysis of Request Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a final PUD is limited to whether the proposed plan is in substantial conformance with the preliminary PUD development plan. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final PUD development plan. The City’s discretion in approving a final plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Final PUD Development Plan Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the approved preliminary plans, as well as City policies. Staff finds that the final PUD development plan is generally consistent with the approved preliminary plans. However, there are a number of conditions that must be addressed prior to release of the final plat and authorization to begin construction. The Tavera preliminary plat did include the parcel at 6421 County Road 116, but it was not included in the final plat for phase one. The applicant must provide the new PID assigned by Hennepin County to Outlot B, Tavera 1st Addition. The applicant was issued a grading permit that allows grading from the new Horseshoe Trail access on the north to Hackamore Road on the south. This phase is directly south of the 1st Addition final plat that was approved earlier this year. This plans include extension of the Tamarack Lane cul-de- sac to the south and connection to 64th Avenue. There is a landscaped island in the Block 4 and additional planting details are required to be submitted for review and approval by the City. Phase 2 of the proposed development includes 46 new single-family homes. The lots range in size from 7,215 – 16,559 sq. ft. There is a master association for maintain common areas (signs, boulevard irrigation and landscaping, etc.) in this phase. The HOA documents will be amended to include this phase. Preliminary PUD Development Plan The neighborhood will be built over eight years and we can expect that house plans offered by Lennar today may be modified with different options by the time the project is built out. The developer has provided example products for discussion with the preliminary approvals and Tavera 2nd Addition Final Plat and Final PUD Plan (city file 21-036) 3 September 23, 2021 conditions were included to ensure compliance with those approvals, but other house plans could be approved by staff over time. The plan includes a mix of the approved single family home lot sizes (55-, 65- and 75-foot wide lots). Lot Dimensions and Setbacks The preliminary plat approval granted some flexibility from the lot size and width standards and rear yard setbacks for decks and patios. The approved standards are included in the approving resolutions. However, since buyers will select their individual home for each lot, staff will review setbacks for compliance with these standards as part of the building permit application. Design Standards The applicant as granted flexibility from the garage standards in in Section 1040.040, Subd 8 of the Zoning Ordinance as part of the preliminary approvals. The homes will be selected for each lot by the buyers and must comply with all design standards and PUD standards. This will be reviewed at building permit to ensure compliance. Utilities The City Engineer’s memo provides detailed utility comments. This project will extend municipal sewer and water from the 1st Addition to serve this phase of the development. Existing Easements There is a large electrical transmission line easement that runs east west through the southern portion of the site. Lot 12, Block 1 is located in this powerline easement. Lennar had provided document number 10879791 indicating release of a portion of the easement, but the drawings continue to show the easement. Staff has included a condition that the applicant provide details of this easement and any restrictions to ensure there are no conflicts with the proposed plans or remove from the plans if the easement has been released. New standard drainage and utility easements will be provided with the plat around the perimeter of the lots, over stormwater management ponds and over the wetlands (over the wetland and buffer areas). The engineer’s memo notes where revisions are required. Wetlands Wetland permits have been approved by the watershed. The applicant is proposing nearly 3 acres of wetland impact on the site and intends to purchase off-site wetland credits to mitigate for the impact. Section 1050.010 establishes standards for the wetland overlay district. This includes establishment of wetland buffer strips with an average buffer width of 25 feet plus a 15-foot structure setback from the buffer. Wetland buffer signs are required to be installed at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer, and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of Tavera 2nd Addition Final Plat and Final PUD Plan (city file 21-036) 4 September 23, 2021 200 feet of wetland edge. The plans do not currently comply and must be revised to show compliance with these requirements. Natural Resources The Comprehensive Plan includes a Natural Resource Inventory Areas map (Map 1-7) that shows wetlands and woodland areas and an Ecologically Significant Natural Areas map (Map 1-12) that shows Oak Forest, Maple-basswood forest and lowland hardwood forest scattered throughout the site. The City does not have a tree preservation ordinance. However, as part of the preliminary approvals, the applicant indicated that preservation of a significant portion of these areas is one of the PUD benefits. The final PUD plans show 42% preservation of the ecologically significant areas and 70% of the woodland areas outside of the boundaries. A conservation easement for the tree protection areas was recorded with the 1st Addition. Outlot A will be in this conservation area and will include a City trail that will be constructed by the applicant. The trail location must be adjusted in Outlot A to comply with the PUD approvals. Landscaping The applicant is required to provide one tree for each dwelling unit. These trees are generally proposed to be evenly spaced in the front yard along the street to create a tree lined street canopy. Staff recommends all trees be planted when the street is completed, but these must be planted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the adjacent home. A setback reduction from 100 feet to 60 feet were approved as allowed by Section 1060 of the Zoning ordinance, which allows the reduction by right if additional landscaping is required. The ordinance requires 1 overstory deciduous tree, 1 overstory coniferous tree, 2 ornamental trees, and 10 understory shrubs per 100 ft. of the project site where the reduction is requested. The applicant requested and received PUD approval to add additional trees in lieu of shrubs. The plan complies with the PUD approval. The irrigation plan includes some potable water and stormwater reuse. The City requires a detailed irrigation operation and maintenance plan for the system as noted in the engineering memo. The irrigation system must have a rain detection device so as to prevent irrigation during rain events. Lighting Standard street lighting will be provided by Wright Hennepin Electric. Streetlights are generally located on the sidewalk side of the street but will be coordinated with the City and field located during construction. Tavera 2nd Addition Final Plat and Final PUD Plan (city file 21-036) 5 September 23, 2021 Parks and Trails The 2040 Parks and Trails Plan map shows On Road trails on County Road 116, Hackamore Road and Horseshoe Trail (66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway), which can be accommodated in the right-of- way. There is an Off Road trail running north to south in this area and this trail coincides with the regional trail planned by Three Rivers Park District. The preliminary approvals included a 4.06-acre park and 1.8-miles of trails. Additionally, Outlot K (as noted in the preliminary plat) will be deeded to the City to provide access to the park. This will also preserve options for a future extension of Horseshoe Trail should the properties to the west redevelop in the future. Trails and Sidewalks A new trail will be constructed in Outlot A and sidewalks will be constructed on one side of each of the new streets. There were a number of revisions required with the preliminary approvals that must be addressed for this phase: • The sidewalk on Tamarack Lane must be shifted to the east side of the street to avoid conflicts with the trail on the south end of the project. o This was a condition of the 1st Addition as well but the plans continue to show the sidewalk on the West side of the street. o Plans must be revised. • Rather than the mid-block trail crossing from Outlot A to the park, the trail should be shifted east north of the wetland to connect at the intersection of Horseshoe Trail and Tamarack Lane. o Plans must be revised. o This may also affect the conservation easement and tree preservation plans. Trails will be maintained by the City according to City trail policy and sidewalks will be maintained by the HOA or homeowners. Park Dedication The City should accept park dedication in the form of land where shown on the maps. The City may accept cash-in-lieu of land if park dedication requirements are not met by the land dedication. The park dedication requirements for Tavera would be satisfied with a combination of park land dedication (park and trail easement) plus cash-in-lieu of fees. Park dedication will be based on the park dedication fee in place at the time the plat is released for filing. Park dedication for the 46 lots included in the 2nd Addition shall be the trail easement and cash-in- lieu of land. The developer must revise the off-road trail alignment and then provide gross and net areas for the 20-foot wide trail easement. Park dedication will be given for the trail easement and the remainder will be cash. Tavera 2nd Addition Final Plat and Final PUD Plan (city file 21-036) 6 September 23, 2021 Final Plat The applicant is requesting approval of a final plat for 46 single-family residential home lots and five outlots. The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Development Phasing The developer plans to develop this project in eight phases. Timing will be contingent upon extension of public infrastructure and market demand. The phasing plan may be modified at each stage to better correspond with public improvements. Conclusion Staff finds that the proposed plan is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and preliminary PUD approvals. The staff report noted the outstanding issues that must be addressed and staff has included conditions in the attached resolution to address these issues. 5. Recommendation Move to recommend approval of the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: a. Resolution 2021-104 approving the final PUD development plan b. Resolution 2021-105 approving the final plat and development contract Attachments 1. Resolution 2021-104 approving the final PUD development plan 2. Resolution 2021-105 approving the final plat and development contract 3. Draft Development Contract 4. City engineer’s memo dated August 24, 2021 5. Location map 6. Applicant’s narrative dated July 20, 2021 7. Final PUD Development Plans dated July 20, 2021 8. Landscape Plans dated July 20, 2021 9. Final Plat dated July 20, 2021 10. Master Plan from PUD amendment dated April 9, 2021 11. Phasing Plan dated August 31, 2021 City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-104 Page 1 of 6 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLAN FOR “TAVERA 2nd ADDITION” FOR LENNAR (PID 35-119-23-44-0004 and 35-119-23-41-0001) (CITY FILE NO. 21-036) WHEREAS, US Home Corporation, a Delaware Corporation dba Lennar (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a final PUD (planned unit development) plan for “Tavera 2nd Addition” for 46 new residential lots and five outlots on property legally described as: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a public meeting and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a final PUD development plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. A final PUD development plan is approved to create 46 lots and five outlots for “Tavera 2nd Addition”, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on July 20, 2021 and additional information received on August 6, 2021 and August 12, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is subject to the preliminary approvals (Resolutions 2020-50 and 2020-51), except as modified by the PUD amendment (Resolution 2021-86). 3. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo dated August 24, 2021. 4. The applicant must provide proof of the correct PID numbers for both parcels from Hennepin County. 5. All plan sheets must clearly identify the boundaries of Tavera 2nd Addition. 6. The plans show the easement for electric powerlines over Lot 12, Block 1. The applicant must either: a. Provide documentation from the easement holder that home construction will be permitted in this easement or b. If the easement was released by Hennepin County document #10879791, the easement should be removed from the plans. 7. City landscape details must be shown on the plans. 8. Consider Black Hills Spruce or other alternative to White Pine, which may not thrive in the soils in this location. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-104 Page 2 of 6 9. Detailed plans for the landscape island, including all plant materials, mulch and irrigation method, must be provided for City review and approval. 10. Lawn sprinklers/irrigation systems (if provided) shall all have rain sensors to limit unnecessary watering. 11. The HOA shall be responsible for maintenance of: a. Landscaping and any irrigation in the cul de sac islands b. Landscaping and any irrigation in the common areas c. Wetland/pond buffer areas d. Sidewalks e. All common areas, including signage, lighting and landscaping in those areas. 12. The following documents must be approved by the City Attorney and recorded at Hennepin County: a. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement b. Temporary Turnaround Easements c. Maintenance and Encroachment agreements for landscaping in the public right-of- way d. Amendment to Homeowners Association documents e. Trail Easement. 13. PUD flexibility is granted to establish the following lot standards for this development: 75-foot lots (58 homes) 65-foot lots (165 homes) 55-foot lots (51 homes) Minimum Lot Area 9,000 sq. ft. 7,800 sq. ft. 6,600 sq. ft. Minimum lot width 75 feet 65 feet 55 feet Front, From Major Roadways* 60 feet 60 feet 60 feet Front, From all other streets 25 feet /20 feet side street 25 feet /20 feet side street 25 feet /20 feet side street Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Side (living) 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet Side (garage)** 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 7.5 feet Rear+ 30 feet / 20 feet for deck/patios 30 feet / 20 feet for deck/patios 30 feet / 20 feet for deck/patios Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet *Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. (reduction from 100 feet to 60 feet per Section 1060.070, Subd.K) **Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 feet. +Homes on Lots 226-228, 375-380 and 490-501 shall be required to meet the 30-foot rear yard setback for structures, including patios and decks. 14. All garages must have a minimum 22-foot wide parking area between the garage and right-of-way that does not overlap into sidewalks, drives or streets. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-104 Page 3 of 6 15. Mechanical equipment (including air conditioning units) must be located in the side or rear yard. 16. Driveways may not encroach in the drainage and utility easements on the side yards 17. The following items must be completed and approved by the City prior to release of the final plat: a. Woodland areas shown as preserved on the plans must be protected. i. Tree preservation fencing must be shown on the grading plan. ii. Tree protection fencing must be installed on site prior to beginning work. iii. Tree preservation areas must be protected by a permanent conservation easement. iv. The conservation easement boundary must be shown on the grading plan. v. The applicant must submit a new plan sheet that shows tree preservation and disturbed areas (grading, utilities and landscaping etc.). vi. The conservation easement shall be amended as required to address the modified trail alignment in Outlot A. b. Wetland buffers, setbacks and monuments must be shown grading and site plan sheets. The site plan must show the wetland buffers and setbacks with the house pads. c. The wetland buffers monument locations must be revised to comply with City standards. d. Park Dedication for Tavera will be satisfied by dedication of neighborhood park land, off road trail and cash-in-lieu of land for this project. Park dedication will be required at each phase. This phase requires the following: i. The applicant shall provide a final calculation of the net and gross acreage of the trail easement in Outlot A. ii. The developer shall construct all trails and sidewalks shown on the plan, except the on-road trails on County Road 101 and Hackamore Road. iii. The developer shall adjust trail and sidewalk alignment and provide connections as recommended by staff in the June 25, 2020 staff report, which requires the following modifications in this phase: 1. The sidewalk on Tamarack Lane must be shifted to the east side of the street to avoid conflicts with the trail on the south end of the project. Plans must be revised. 2. Rather than the mid-block trail crossing from Outlot A to the park, the trail should be shifted east north of the wetland to connect at the intersection of Horseshoe Trail and Tamarack Lane. Plans must be revised. 3. This may also affect the conservation easement and tree preservation plans. iv. A 20-foot trail easement must be provided for the trail in Outlot A. v. Park dedication shall be the net area of the trail easement and cash-in-lieu for the 46 lots in this phase. The park dedication fees will be calculated only when the developer provides final trail easement calculations. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-104 Page 4 of 6 vi. Park dedication shall be subject to park dedication fees in place when the final plat is released for recording. e. The applicant shall provide copies of the final HOA document/covenant amendments for City review and approval. These documents must be recorded with the final plat. f. The stormwater maintenance agreement must be executed. 18. The following items must be addressed prior to issuance of building permits: a. The applicant shall provide proof of recording the final plat and related documents at Hennepin County. b. The plans show centralized mailbox locations. These mailbox locations shall be approved by the US Postal Service and proof of the approved locations provided to the City. c. The single family homes must comply with the standards in Section 1040.040, Subd. 8, except as specifically modified by this resolution. d. PUD flexibility is provided to allow the face of the garage to exceed 55% of the building face for the single family homes. In exchange for this flexibility: i. Garage door colors shall be compatible with the building colors. ii. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior of the home. iii. The garage must not extend in front of the home (including the front porch) on homes that exceed 55% garage face. e. In exchange for the PUD flexibility for the single family homes: i. A color or texture change shall be provided on all sides of the homes such as but not limited to lap siding changes, band boards, board and batten, or shake or scale textures. Variations to exterior siding textures or colors may be horizontal or vertical. ii. A 4” LP trim on all windows on all elevations. iii. Optional window grids or optional shutters on some homes. The developer shall work with staff to better define this application. f. Building plans must provide elevations with colors, material details and percentages on the elevations to confirm compliance with ordinance standards. g. Trees shall be planted in the right-of-way for the 80-foot and the 60-foot streets (where there is room for the public infrastructure and the trees) but be placed outside of the right-of-way in the 50-foot wide streets. i. Trees must be planted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the adjacent home. h. No signage is proposed or approved for this phase. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-104 Page 5 of 6 i. Section 1050.010 requires a 15-foot wetland buffer structure setback, but allows patios and decks to encroach a maximum of 6 feet into required structure setback. j. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. i. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. ii. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. iii. Monuments and signs shall be installed prior to approval of the building permit. k. The development shall comply with the City’s requirements regarding fire access, fire protection and fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, fire department connections and fire lane signage. l. Parking shall be permitted on one side of the local streets and shall be signed in accordance with city standards. m. All utility facilities shall be located underground. n. Barricades and signage indicating future extension shall be installed, consistent with Section 945.010, Subd. 19 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 19. Any request to for the City to inspect the required landscaping in order to reduce financial guarantees must be accompanied by recertification/verification of field inspection by the project Landscape Architect. A letter signed by the project Landscape Architect verifying plantings (including wetland and pond buffers) have been correctly installed in compliance with the plans and specifications will suffice. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-104 Page 6 of 6 Attachment A Outlot B, TAVERA, according to the recorded plat thereof Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The east 16 rods of the north 20 rods of the south 29.8 rods if the Northeast Quarter of \he Southeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, said Hennepin County. Except the east 90.00 feet thereof. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-105 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR “TAVERA 2nd ADDITION” FOR LENNAR (PID 35-119-23-44-0004 and 35-119-23-41-0001) (CITY FILE NO. 21-036) WHEREAS, US Home Corporation, a Delaware Corporation dba Lennar (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a final plat for “Tavera 2nd Addition” for 46 new residential lots and five outlots on property legally described as: See Attachment A FURTHER, that the development contract for said plat shall be completed by city staff and the Mayor and that the City Administrator be authorized to execute the development contract on behalf of the City; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that it should and hereby does approve the request for a final plat for Tavera 1st Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. A final plat is approved to create 46 lots and five outlots for “Tavera 2nd Addition”, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on July 20, 2021 and additional information received on August 6, 2021 and August 12, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the final PUD development plan. 3. The development contract must be executed by the developer and the City and must be filed with the final plat. 4. Development is subject to all conditions of the “Tavera” preliminary plat and preliminary PUD approvals (Resolutions 2020-50 and 2020-51), except as modified by the PUD amendment (Resolution 2021-86). 5. The developer must submit a final plat for each future phase of development. No final approvals are granted at this time for phases of development. 6. Park dedication shall be a combination of land and cash-in-lieu of land as described in Resolution 2021-104. 7. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo dated August 24, 2021. 8. Drainage and utility easements must be provided over all wetlands, wetland buffers and ponds. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-105 Page 2 of 4 9. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. a. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. b. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. c. Monuments and signs shall be installed prior to approval of the building permit. 10. The applicant must file the final plat at Hennepin County within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. 11. The following documents must be approved by the City Attorney and recorded at Hennepin County: a. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement b. Temporary Turnaround Easements c. Trail Easement d. Maintenance and Encroachment agreements for landscaping in the public right- of-way. e. Homeowners association documents f. Conservation easement for tree preservation amendment 12. Record the approving resolutions and associated documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 13. The applicant shall provide proof of recording the final plat and related documents at Hennepin County. 14. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plat drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to release of remaining escrow: 15. Lot corner monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. A financial guarantee shall be required to ensure installation per city requirements. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-105 Page 3 of 4 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-105 Page 4 of 4 Attachment A Outlot B, TAVERA, according to the recorded plat thereof Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The east 16 rods of the north 20 rods of the south 29.8 rods if the Northeast Quarter of \he Southeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, said Hennepin County. Except the east 90.00 feet thereof. (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) TAVERA 2ND ADDITION CONTRACT dated ____________________, 2021, by and between the CITY OF CORCORAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and U.S. HOME CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION (DBA LENNAR) (the “Developer”). This is an amendment to the master Tavera Development Contract dated June 23, 2021. 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for Tavera 2nd Addition (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described in Exhibit A. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer shall enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat upon City approval with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Unless separate written approval has been given by the City, within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat, development contract and other associated documents have been recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office and proof of recording has been provided to the City, and 4) the City has issued written notice that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. However, the Developer may be allowed to begin grading the site when items 1, 2 and 4 of the previous sentence have been satisfied. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has failed to fulfill all obligations in this Contract and the failure has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Park charges and area charges for sewer and water referred to in this Contract are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the plat that are designated in an approved preliminary plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are final platted into lots and blocks. - 2 – 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within two (2) years after preliminary plat approval. 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Exhibit A – Legal Description Plan A – Final Plat, received July 20, 2021 Plan B – Final Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan, received July 20, 2021 Plan C – Final Tree Preservation and Reforestation Plan, received July 20, 2021 Plan D – Final Landscape Plan, received July 20, 2021 Plan E – Final Utility and Street Construction Plan, received July 20, 2021 Plan G – Revised Preliminary Plat, received July 20, 2021 Plan H – Phasing Plan, received August 19, 2021 8. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for all of the following improvements: • Streets • Sanitary Sewer • Watermain • Surface Water Facilities (pipe, ponds, rain gardens, etc.) • Grading and Erosion Control • Sidewalks/Trails • Street Lighting • Underground Utilities • Street Signs and Traffic Control Signs • Landscaping Required by Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance • Tree Preservation • Wetland Mitigation and Buffers • Monuments Required by Minnesota Statutes • Miscellaneous Facilities The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the city engineer or designee. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide full-time field inspection personnel in order for the Developer's engineer to be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the - 3 – Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer and/or the Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his or her engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at City Hall with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. All labor and work shall be done and performed in the best and most workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No deviations from the approved plans and specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the city engineer or designee. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors being considered for retention by the Developer for the performance of the work required by the contract. The Developer shall not do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this contract, for which reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is first approved in writing by the city engineer or designee. The Developer shall be responsible for construction of all improvements in conformance with the approved plans and specs. 9. OFF-SITE PUBLIC IMPROVMENTS. The City intends to make improvements to County Road 116 at the intersection of the future Horseshoe Trail providing access to the site, improve Hackamore Road, improve existing Horseshoe Trail and Old Settlers Road, extend municipal sanitary sewer to the site and complete stormwater improvements. The public improvements are more fully detailed in the Feasibility Study dated November 21, 2019, prepared by Wenck Associates, Inc. the developer agrees to fund off-site improvements as noted in this agreement. There are no payments due with Tavera 2nd Addition. The following improvements will be funded by the developer with future phases as noted below: • The City believes that a traffic signal will be required at County Road 116 and Horseshoe Trail. The developer shall be responsible for half of the cost of this signal. The City estimates that the signal will be required when 75% of the lots are platted. • The developer shall provide a financial guarantee to the City for the cost of the Hackamore Road improvements, including County Road 116 intersection improvements and improvements at the Tavera entrance (estimated at $2,350,000). The development contract will include $2,350,000 in the letter of credit. When the City bids the project, the City will reduce the letter of credit by $2,350,000 and require the developer to provide cash escrow based on the final bid amount. If the City of Medina or Hennepin County financially participates in the project, the financial guarantee from the developer would be offset by these other funds. The financial guarantee shall be provided when 50% of the lots south of Horseshoe Trail are platted or the Hackamore Road connection is made, whichever occurs first. • The developer shall provide a financial guarantee to the City for the cost to shape and pave Old Settlers Road and Horseshoe Trail (estimated at $375,000). The development contract will include $375,000 in the letter of credit. When the City bids the project, the City will - 4 – reduce the letter of credit by $375,000 and require the developer to provide cash escrow based on the final bid amount. The financial guarantee shall be provided when 75% of the lots north of Horseshoe Trail are platted or the Horseshoe Trail connection is made, whichever occurs first. • The developer shall provide a financial guarantee for the Horseshoe Trail west watermain loop (estimated at $225,000). The development contract will include $225,000 in the letter of credit. When the City bids the project, the City will reduce the letter of credit by $225,000 and require the developer to provide cash escrow based on the final bid amount. The financial guarantee shall be provided when 75% of the lots north of Horseshoe Trail are platted or the Horseshoe Trail connection is made, whichever occurs first. The final route shall be determined by the City. o The current plan (Plan G) eliminates the need for watermain looping along Hackamore Road as originally anticipated in the EAW/feasibility study. • The developer shall provide a financial guarantee to the City for the cost of the FEMA Map Amendment for the northeast part of the site (estimated at $25,000). The development contract will include $25,000 in the letter of credit. When 100% of the lots south of Horseshoe Trail are platted, the City will reduce the letter of credit by $25,000 and require the developer to provide cash escrow based on the updated engineering estimate for the FEMA process and due with the final plat for that phase. • The developer shall provide a financial guarantee to the City for the cost of the FEMA Map Amendment for the northwest part of the site (estimated at $25,000). The development contract will include $25,000 in the letter of credit. When 100% of the lots north of Horseshoe Trail are platted, the City will reduce the letter of credit by $25,000 and require the developer to provide cash escrow based on the updated engineering estimate for the FEMA process and due with the final plat for that phase. a. The developer agrees to pay the City the cost of these improvements as outlined above. The City will notify the developer of required reimbursement under this paragraph for design and construction of such improvements. The costs to be reimbursed include the actual cost to the City for construction of the improvements plus the allocation of the engineering, legal, administrative and other similar costs of the project based on the relative construction costs of the improvements. The developer reserves the right to be refunded for any unused portion of the estimated cost versus the actual cost of each improvement. 10. CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Commission members, and corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such individuals have greater than a 25% ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 8 above. 11. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: • Hennepin County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights-of-Way • Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains/Wells - 5 – • NPDES Permits • MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal • Hennepin County for Septic System Permits and/or Abandonment • DNR for Dewatering and Work in Protected Waters • City of Corcoran for Building Permits and Building Demolition • Watershed Permits 12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements in this phase by October 31, 2022, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on streets. The City will not accept new public streets in the 2nd Addition until 80% of the homes in the 2nd Addition have received a certificate of occupancy and the streets have weathered a full winter season. Final wear course placement outside of this time frame must have the written approval of the City Engineer. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 13. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 14. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress for grading, public utility construction, and street construction is restricted to access the subdivision via Horseshoe Trail at County Road 116. The City Engineer may allow access to Hackamore Road for limited access. No construction traffic is permitted on other adjacent local streets. 15. GRADING PLAN. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading drainage and erosion control plan, Plan "B". The plan shall conform to City of Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. 16. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. Erosion control practices must comply with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s Best Management Practices. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All erosion control shall comply with Section 950 (Erosion Control) of the Corcoran City Code and the Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 17. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on the same and to direct attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the event residences are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage to ensure that the streets are passable to traffic and emergency vehicles. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the subdivision swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill, track, or wash onto the street from Developer’s operation. - 6 – 18. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract and acceptance of the work by the City, the improvements lying within public easements or right-of-way shall become City property. Prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits: • Contractor’s Certificate • Engineer’s Certificate • Land Surveyor’s Certificate 19. PARK DEDICATION. The Developer shall dedicate to the City the park as shown on the preliminary plat. The Developer shall also dedicate to the City the trail easements identified on the preliminary plat, except as modified by the approving resolutions and construct all trails as shown on the plans. The developer shall construct the bituminous trails in the subdivision and shall work with the city on the final location within the public park. No credit shall be given for trail construction. Credit shall be given for the net area of the park land and trail easement area. The remainder of the required park dedication shall be satisfied with cash-in-lieu of land. Park dedication shall be obtained based on the phase being platted. Tavera 2nd Addition will dedicate the trail easement in Outlot A, Tavera 2nd Addition. Prior to release of the final plat, the Developer shall satisfy the park dedication requirements by dedication of the net area of the trail easement and a cash contribution of $152,924.00 (46 lots x $4,628.00). The charge was calculated in accordance with Section 955 of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance. 20. WATERMAIN / STORAGE TRUNK LINE AREA CHARGE (TLAC). This plat is subject to a watermain/storage trunk line area charge (TLAC). The charge is calculated as follows: 20.36 net acres (based on pre-developable area) $7,475.00 per acre = $152,191.00. Future phases shall be cash with the final plat for each future phase subject to the then-current rates. 21. WATER CONNECTION CHARGE. This plat is subject to a water connection charge calculated as follows: 46 units x $1,219.00 per unit = $56,074.00. The fees shall be paid at the time of building permit. Future development shall be cash at the time of issuance of each building permit at the then- current rates. The developer will be responsible for payment of the then-current water connection charge set by the City of Maple Grove. 22. SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LINE AREA CHARGE (TLAC). This plat is subject to a sanitary sewer trunk line area charge (TLAC). The charge is calculated as follows: The charge is calculated as follows: 20.36 net acres (based on pre-developable area) x $7,189.00 per acre = $146,368.04. Future phases shall be cash with the final plat for each future phase subject to the then-current rates. The developer will also be responsible for payment of the then-current SAC fee set by the Metropolitan Council. 23. SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGE. This plat is subject to a sanitary sewer connection charge calculated as follows: 46 units x $1,219.00 per unit = $56,074.00. The fees shall be paid at the time of building permit. Future development shall be cash at the time of issuance of each building permit at the then-current rates. - 7 – 24. BUILDING PERMITS/CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. A. Curbing, and one lift of asphalt shall be installed on all public and private streets prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, except two model homes on lots acceptable to the City Planner may be issued a certificate of occupancy if needed for the Parade of Homes. B. The Developer shall comply with the City of Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. C. Prior to issuance of building permits, wetland buffer monuments shall be placed in accordance with the City’s zoning ordinance. Specifications for the monuments are available from the City Planner. D. Failure to fulfill any of the terms of this Contract by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties, and the halting of all work in the plat. E. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, their contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are tested and approved by the City Engineer. 25. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS/TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS. Street name signs shall be installed by the Developer in accordance with the City of Corcoran Engineering Design Standards. The Developer shall install traffic control signs in accordance with the plan approved by the City Engineer and Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. All signs must be installed prior to final building inspection approval or earlier if necessary as determined by the City Engineer. 26. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION AND OPERATION COSTS. The developer shall pay for and install all street lights. The street light shall be of a design approved by the City. The developer shall be responsible for street light operation and maintenance costs until such time as the City accepts the public street where the streetlights are located. After the acceptance the City shall be responsible for all costs, subject to the street lighting policy. The costs of operation are dependent upon the operation costs for Wright Hennepin Electric under contract franchise with the City of Corcoran. 27. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. The City may require Developer to post funds in an escrow account, at its discretion. In the event the cash escrow amount is insufficient, Developer shall post additional escrow funds as determined by the City Planner within ten (10) days of written demand. Failure to make - 8 – payment of the additional escrow amount shall permit the City to supplement those amounts from any other sureties posted by Developer. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this contract. This is a personal obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 28. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Compliance with the conditions of the original approvals (Resolution 2020-50 and Resolution 2020-51), including the PUD Final Development Plan (Resolution 2021-104) and Final Plat approval (Resolution 2021-105). B. Before the City signs the final plat, the developer shall convey the required trail easement to the City in a form satisfactory to the City C. The Developer shall install a temporary turnaround on the south end of Tamarack Lane until it is extended to the south with the adjacent phase of the Tavera development. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall furnish the City an appropriately executed temporary turnaround easement, in recordable form. D. The Developer shall post a $4,600.00 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners. The security was calculated as follows: 46 lots at $100.00 per lot. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. In addition, the certificate of survey must also include a certification that all irons for a specific lot have either been found or set prior to the issuance of a building permit for that lot. E. The Developer must obtain a sign permit from the City Building Official prior to installation of any subdivision identification signs. - 9 – F. The Developer shall include the “City of Corcoran’s Standard Detail Specifications” (all applicable sections) in the contract documents of their improvement project. 29. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in conjunction with a sale of the entire land, the Developer may, without the consent of the City, assign this Contract to a limited liability company or other entity in which the Developer or an affiliate thereof has a controlling membership or other controlling ownership interest, provided that such assignee assumes in writing the obligations of Developer under this Contract. B. Certain retaining walls will require a Building Permit. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the Building Official evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls identified on the development plans or by special conditions referred to in this Contract shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. C. Appropriate legal documents including, but not limited to, those regarding Homeowner Association documents, conservation easements, covenants and restrictions, as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final Plat. D. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given thirty (30) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The insurance shall be primary and non-contributory as to any policy maintained by the City. E. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. F. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. G. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties - 10 – and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for failure to fulfill any of the foregoing covenants. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 30. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 31. WARRANTY/PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit or performance bond for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to one (1) year from the date of final written acceptance, unless the wearing course is placed during the same construction season as the bituminous base course. In those instances, the subdivider shall guarantee all work, including street construction, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, - 11 – material and equipment for a period of two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one full growing season following installation. Following construction, a certification signed by the design landscape architect shall be filed with the City evidencing that the sod, trees, and landscaping was installed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. 32. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in a form acceptable to the City, from a bank, cash escrow or a combination cash escrow and Letter of Credit ("security") for $1,972,756.03, which represents 100 percent of the estimated cost of the Improvements. The letter of credit shall include an automatic renewal clause. The letter of credit shall guarantee to the City the construction and satisfactory completion of all items to be completed by the developer; that the letter of credit shall be reduced from time to time as work is performed and accepted in a satisfactory manner; that the city engineer may reduce the letter of credit to the amount reasonably estimated by the City engineer to be necessary to cover the remaining construction obligations; however, the letter of credit shall not be reduced below the amount estimated by the City to cover all obligations of development including payment of costs and expenses incurred by the City for legal, engineering, planning and any other costs until a maintenance bond for period of one year, satisfactory to the city attorney and the city engineer has been provided by the developer or its subcontractor. - 12 – The amount of the security was calculated as follows: ESTIMATED COSTS City Project Developer ITEM No._______(1) Installed (2) Private (3) Total Street Construction* Sanitary Sewer System $393,710.50 $393,710.50 Watermain System $235,281.00 $235,281.00 Storm Sewer System $511,642.50 $511,642.50 Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod Pond Construction Rain Garden Street and Traffic Control Signs $654,491.95 $654,491.95 Sidewalk Improvements Trail Improvements Landscaping $31,500.00 $31,500.00 Street Lighting Site Grading & Drainage Imp.** Setting Iron Monuments $4,600.00 $4,600.00 Tree Preservation and Reforestation Wetland Buffer Monuments* SUB-TOTAL: $1,831,225.95 $1,831,225.95 Design, Admin, Insp, As-Builts (8%) $146,498.08 $146,498.08 Total: $1,977,724.03 $1,977,724.03 Total Project Cost $1,977,724.03 (1) Public Improvement/City Project. City to own and maintain after development complete. (2) Developer Installed Public Improvements. City to own and maintain after development complete. (3) Private - Property owner and/or property owners' association to maintain after development completed. *Street Construction includes costs for wetland signs, sidewalk and trail improvements **Note: If a grading permit was issued and the financial guarantee released and/or expired, these monies may be used for the required maintenance of the erosion and sediment control plan. 33. This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the city engineer or designee that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with city engineer or designee approval the security may be reduced from time to time by 75% of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the amounts certified by the - 13 – Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed; (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed; (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied; (4) the required "record" plans have been received by the City; (5) a warranty security is provided; and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 34. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Contract which must be furnished to the City at the time of final plat approval: Water Supply Trunk line area charge (TLAC) $ 152,191.00 Sanitary Sewer Trunk line area charge (TLAC) 146,368.04 Park Dedication 152,924.00 Engineering Escrow 50,000.00 TOTAL CASH REQUIREMENTS LEVIED: $ 400,594.72 35. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Corcoran City Hall, 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340. The Developer shall notify the City within five (5) days of change of address. CITY OF CORCORAN: BY: ______________________________________ Tom McKee, Mayor (SEAL) AND _____________________________________ Brad Martens, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of ________________, 20____, by Tom McKee and by Brad Martens, the mayor and city administrator of the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DEVELOPER: By: ______________________________________ Its: ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ________________, 20____, by __________________________________ the ____________________________________ of ______________________________________ on its behalf. ______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT _______________________________________________________, fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2_____. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _____________, 2____, by ______________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 MORTGAGE CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT _______________________________________________________, which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2_____. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2_____, by __________________________________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 CONTRACT PURCHASER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT _______________________________________________________________, which/who has a contract purchaser's interest in all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, hereby affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property in which there is a contract purchaser's interest. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2_____. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2____, by ____________________________________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 EXHIBIT “A” TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Legal Description of Property Being Final Platted as Tavera 2nd Addition: Outlot B, TAVERA, according to the recorded plat thereof Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with: The east 16 rods of the north 20 rods of the south 29.8 rods if the Northeast Quarter of \he Southeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 119, Range 23, said Hennepin County. Except the east 90.00 feet thereof. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Tavera 2nd Addition Date: August 24, 2021 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents by Pioneer Engineering: • Tavera Phase I Grading Plan, Rev 07/16/2021 • Tavera PUD & Master Utility Plan Set, Rev 07/16/2021 • Tavera 2nd Addition Utility Plan, Rev 07/16/2021 • Tavera Phase 1 Storm Water Management Plan. Rev 05/27/2021 Comments: General: 1. Consistent with the review process, a comment response letter shall be provided in response to the following comments provided in this Memorandum in which the applicant provides a written response to each item. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the proposed plans are subject to addition planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. Plat: 1. The applicant shall have all drainage and utility easements provided and shown and all platting requirements met per the City Code. Drainage and utility easements (5’ – 10’) shall be provided along property lines, as standard per City requirements. 2. Trail easement shall be provided over all trail segments outside of the right of way. Erosion Control/SWPPP 1. Preparation of and compliance with a SWPPP shall be required for construction. 2. Any slopes 4:1 or greater shall have erosion control blanket installed. 3. Provide erosion control BMPs, including perimeter control and stabilization, along length of proposed western most trail disturbance. The trail is directly adjacent to a wetland. Transportation 1. All 28’ roads shall be signed no parking on one side of the roadway with no parking signs required within all cul-de-sacs. 2. Cul-de-sac/eyebrow on 64th Ave to be 28’ F-F. January 27, 2021 Development Name Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 3 3. Install concrete valley gutter at east cul-de-sac entrance on 64th Ave to drain to low point. It appears the south curb line should drain west to match northern curb line. 4. Bituminous trails to remain outside of wetland buffers Site Plans 1. The existing and proposed drainage and utility easements shown shall be clearly labeled on all plan drawings. The wetland buffer zones shall also be clearly identified and labeled. 2. Street lighting and sign locations shall be reviewed by public safety. o Provide no parking sign in cul-de-sac Grading /Stormwater 1. The wetland buffer zones and wetland buffer signage shall be reviewed by city planning. 2. All pedestrian ramps shall be ADA compliant and detailed designs shall be provided for all landings showing elevations in compliance with those requirements. o Provide spot elevations and slopes of ADA ramps in intersection details. 3. Easements shall be provided over all storm sewer pipes. Easements shall be shown on the utility plan to ensure they are adequate. 4. Label clearly on plans EOF’s for all areas where water will be collected including all low areas in roadways and greenspaces. 5. All drainage swales shall maintain a minimum of 2% slope and all slope should be 4:1 or flatter unless approved by the city engineer. 6. All walls higher than 4’ shall be designed by a certified engineer and the design and certification of those walls shall be provided to the city. 7. Remove riprap from upstream flared end sections. 8. Remove comment to fill sump to invert on OCS details sheet 4.00 9. Sump connections for lots 9-12 block 1 shall tie into storm structure. Shall not be directly daylighted to wetland. 10. OCS -L and OCS-180 appear to have rim elevations above finished grade. 11. Sumps will be required in all storm structures with drops in of 18” or greater as well as the last accessible structures prior to stormwater basins. Add sumps or adjust pipe slopes on the following structures: o CBMH-3010 o STMH-1803 o STMH-0 12. Revise trail grading to have vertical curves, eliminate grade breaks. 13. Bituminous trail to be 1’ above HWL of adjacent wetlands 14. Revise the culvert EOF elevation label (979.3) on the Grading Plan between wetlands I and L1 to correspond with the model indicated EOF elevation of 980.6. Additionally, relocate the annotation arrow to reference the western most pipe, which aligns with the 2nd Addition Utility Plan. 15. Revise Final PUD or Phase 1 Grading Plan and 2nd Addition Utility to include or exclude the proposed pipes under the westernmost trail. The Final PUD includes proposed pipes under the trail, but the Phase I Grading Plan and 2nd Addition Utility Plan do not. 16. Revise the following stormwater conveyance structures in SWMM or Final PUD to be consistent: January 27, 2021 Development Name Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 3 o Wetland P Link 26: Conduit 1 (U/S) • EOF elevation on Grading Plan (982.8) does not match U/S elevation of overland channel in the model (983.2). Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. Revise general notes to read risers to be DIP to transition bend, schedule 40 PVC to connection. 2. Hydrant spacing to be reviewed by public safety. a. Revise hydrant spacing to have sufficient coverage on 64th Avenue End of Comments Hennepin County Property Map Date: 3/2/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 1,600 feet PARCEL ID: 3511923440001 OWNER NAME: Sharon E Wessel PARCEL ADDRESS: 20020 Hackamore Rd, Corcoran MN 55340 PARCEL AREA: 75.99 acres, 3,310,285 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: SALE DATA: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2019, PAYABLE 2020 PROPERTY TYPE: Farm HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $605,300 TAX TOTAL: $4,882.02 ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Farm HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $617,800 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 CSAH 50 WCorcoranTrECorcoranTrCSAH 1 0 CSAH 50 EagleRidge R d Trail Haven RdKalk RdLarkin Rd Larkin Rd Larkin Rd Larkin Rd Kalk RdCate s Lo n g horn Rd Horseshoe Tr Horseshoe Tr Trail L n Valley View RdElm StTrail LnSnyder RdOl d S e t t l e r s R dtterworth L nOld Se t t le rs RdOld Settlers Rd70th Ave N BuBluebell Tr NArro whead Dr Bluestem R d NSummerhill Ln Summerhill Ln Bluestem RdNMohawk DrLost Horse Rd Katrinka Rd Set t le r s Rd SettlersCtMedinaLake DrFoxberry DrPinto DrHackamore Rd Hackamore RdHackamore CirElm Ridge Cir63rd Ave N Hunter RdHunterLn ParkTrailDr66th A v e N Gleason RdGl e a s o n P k w y Elderberry Ct Prairi e S a g e L n Ln L u p i n e Bluestem LnSteeple Ln G o l d e n r o d T r l BergDr Calamus CirPrimrose Lna m o t S o r r e l C t Annabelle Ln CarriageWayPaddockLn 66thAve N Cedar Ln NBirdiePathLark spu r r LnLarks p urrCt CSAH 101CSAH 101Brockton Ln NFir Ln NCSAH 10 74th Ave N 75th Ave N CS A H 1 0 Maple Hill Rd75th Ave NCommerce St WCommerce St ECommerce StAugerAve CSAH 50 CR-116CR-116Abile n e L nBuckskin TrCima r ron C i r Blue Bonnet DrOld Sturbridge DrOlde Sturbridge Rd PLYMOUTH MEDINA CORCORAN Fieldstone VegabondCt N63rd Pl N Blv d 68th Ave NTroy LnBass L a k e R d Hack a m o r e R d I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-COVR-PUD 0.01COVER SHEET LEGEND SHEETCOVER SHEETSHEET INDEX0.010.02 TAVERA PUD & MASTER UTILITY PLAN SET CORCORAN, MINNESOTA R WETLAND BUFFER PLAN5.01-5.06 4.01-4.02 WETLAND IMPACT3.01-3.02 SITE PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS1.01-1.02 OVERALL STORM SEWER PLAN - SOUTH7.01-7.036.01-6.06 OVERALL SANITARY & WATERMAIN PLAN 2.01-2.06 PRELIMINARY PLAT I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-LGND-PUD 0.02LEGEND c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 9-11-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota 42299 Peter J. Hawkinson 01-ENG-119128-EX-COND.DWG 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 1.01EXISTING CONDITIONS c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 9-11-2020 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota 42299 Peter J. Hawkinson 01-ENG-119128-EX-COND.DWG 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 1.02EXISTING CONDITIONS c30OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH9-11-2020PJC/BNMMPCNameReg. No.DateRevisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type ChangeDateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS9-11-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWG2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd AdditionPRELIMINARY PLAT2.01 c30OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH9-11-2020PJC/BNMMPCNameReg. No.DateRevisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type ChangeDateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS9-11-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWG2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City CommentsPRELIMINARY PLAT2.02 c30OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH9-11-2020PJC/BNMMPCNameReg. No.DateRevisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type ChangeDateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS9-11-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWG2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City CommentsPRELIMINARY PLAT2.03 c30OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH9-11-2020PJC/BNMMPCNameReg. No.DateRevisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type ChangeDateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS9-11-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWG2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City CommentsPRELIMINARY PLAT2.04 c30OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH9-11-2020PJC/BNMMPCNameReg. No.DateRevisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type ChangeDateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS9-11-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWG2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd AdditionPRELIMINARY PLAT2.05 c30OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH9-11-2020PJC/BNMMPCNameReg. No.DateRevisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type ChangeDateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS9-11-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT.DWG2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd AdditionPRELIMINARY PLAT2.06 1ST ADDITION 2ND ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE-PUD 3.01SITE PLAN 2ND ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-SITE-PUD 3.02SITE PLAN WETLAND SITE HACKAMORE NAME IMPACT AREA (SF)IMPACT AREA (SF) WETLAND A 25,252 NA WETLAND C 8,994 NA WETLAND D 14,600 NA WETLAND E 10,863 NA WETLAND H 1,718 NA WETLAND I 25,710 NA WETLAND J 397 NA WETLAND K 230 268 WETLAND L 5,283 NA WETLAND M NA 11,175 WETLAND N 15,411 NA WETLAND O 2,818 NA WETLAND P NA 3,168 WETLAND T 6,127 NA WETLAND U 23,239 NA WETLAND V 6,369 NA WETLAND X 903 NA WETLAND Y 2,666 NA TOTAL 150,580 14,611 WATERBODY IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT NAME AREA (SF)LENGTH (LF) 1 701 131 2 1,800 235 3 688 344 4 396 198 5 212 106 TOTAL 3,797 1,014 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-IMPACT 4.01WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND SITE HACKAMORE NAME IMPACT AREA (SF)IMPACT AREA (SF) WETLAND A 25,252 NA WETLAND C 8,994 NA WETLAND D 14,600 NA WETLAND E 10,863 NA WETLAND H 1,718 NA WETLAND I 25,710 NA WETLAND J 397 NA WETLAND K 230 268 WETLAND L 5,283 NA WETLAND M NA 11,175 WETLAND N 15,411 NA WETLAND O 2,818 NA WETLAND P NA 3,168 WETLAND T 6,127 NA WETLAND U 23,239 NA WETLAND V 6,369 NA WETLAND X 903 NA WETLAND Y 2,666 NA TOTAL 150,580 14,611 WATERBODY IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT NAME AREA (SF)LENGTH (LF) 1 701 131 2 1,800 235 3 688 344 4 396 198 5 212 106 TOTAL 3,797 1,014 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-IMPACT 4.02WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND REQUIRED AVERAGE PROVIDED BUFFER NAME BUFFER AREA (S.F.)AREA (S.F.) WETLAND B 160,550 184,225 WETLAND C 121,952 137,337 WETLAND E 91,755 98,839 WETLAND F&G 65,428 66,142 WETLAND I-N 53,026 60,747 WETLAND I-S&L 136,612 137,495 WETLAND J 11,397 12,817 WETLAND K 38,208 49,961 WETLAND M 20,699 23,273 WETLAND N 17,985 22,002 WETLAND O 55,076 73,677 WETLAND P & Q 45,200 50,040 WETLAND R 39,881 59,973 WETLAND S 10,288 13,866 WETLAND T-N 91,571 135,025 WETLAND T-S 21,294 23,366 WETLAND W 6,849 11,262 TOTAL 1,016,867 1,193,762 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 5.01WETLAND BUFFER PLAN WETLAND REQUIRED AVERAGE PROVIDED BUFFER NAME BUFFER AREA (S.F.)AREA (S.F.) WETLAND B 160,550 184,225 WETLAND C 121,952 137,337 WETLAND E 91,755 98,839 WETLAND F&G 65,428 66,142 WETLAND I-N 53,026 60,747 WETLAND I-S&L 136,612 137,495 WETLAND J 11,397 12,817 WETLAND K 38,208 49,961 WETLAND M 20,699 23,273 WETLAND N 17,985 22,002 WETLAND O 55,076 73,677 WETLAND P & Q 45,200 50,040 WETLAND R 39,881 59,973 WETLAND S 10,288 13,866 WETLAND T-N 91,571 135,025 WETLAND T-S 21,294 23,366 WETLAND W 6,849 11,262 TOTAL 1,016,867 1,193,762 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 5.02WETLAND BUFFER PLAN WETLAND REQUIRED AVERAGE PROVIDED BUFFER NAME BUFFER AREA (S.F.)AREA (S.F.) WETLAND B 160,550 184,225 WETLAND C 121,952 137,337 WETLAND E 91,755 98,839 WETLAND F&G 65,428 66,142 WETLAND I-N 53,026 60,747 WETLAND I-S&L 136,612 137,495 WETLAND J 11,397 12,817 WETLAND K 38,208 49,961 WETLAND M 20,699 23,273 WETLAND N 17,985 22,002 WETLAND O 55,076 73,677 WETLAND P & Q 45,200 50,040 WETLAND R 39,881 59,973 WETLAND S 10,288 13,866 WETLAND T-N 91,571 135,025 WETLAND T-S 21,294 23,366 WETLAND W 6,849 11,262 TOTAL 1,016,867 1,193,762 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 5.03WETLAND BUFFER PLAN WETLAND REQUIRED AVERAGE PROVIDED BUFFER NAME BUFFER AREA (S.F.)AREA (S.F.) WETLAND B 160,550 184,225 WETLAND C 121,952 137,337 WETLAND E 91,755 98,839 WETLAND F&G 65,428 66,142 WETLAND I-N 53,026 60,747 WETLAND I-S&L 136,612 137,495 WETLAND J 11,397 12,817 WETLAND K 38,208 49,961 WETLAND M 20,699 23,273 WETLAND N 17,985 22,002 WETLAND O 55,076 73,677 WETLAND P & Q 45,200 50,040 WETLAND R 39,881 59,973 WETLAND S 10,288 13,866 WETLAND T-N 91,571 135,025 WETLAND T-S 21,294 23,366 WETLAND W 6,849 11,262 TOTAL 1,016,867 1,193,762 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 5.04WETLAND BUFFER PLAN WETLAND REQUIRED AVERAGE PROVIDED BUFFER NAME BUFFER AREA (S.F.)AREA (S.F.) WETLAND B 160,550 184,225 WETLAND C 121,952 137,337 WETLAND E 91,755 98,839 WETLAND F&G 65,428 66,142 WETLAND I-N 53,026 60,747 WETLAND I-S&L 136,612 137,495 WETLAND J 11,397 12,817 WETLAND K 38,208 49,961 WETLAND M 20,699 23,273 WETLAND N 17,985 22,002 WETLAND O 55,076 73,677 WETLAND P & Q 45,200 50,040 WETLAND R 39,881 59,973 WETLAND S 10,288 13,866 WETLAND T-N 91,571 135,025 WETLAND T-S 21,294 23,366 WETLAND W 6,849 11,262 TOTAL 1,016,867 1,193,762 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 5.05WETLAND BUFFER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition 01-ENG-119128-SHEET-WETL-BUFFER 5.06WETLAND BUFFER PLAN INSET A INSET B INSET C INSET D INSET E FUTURE ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition OA-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 6.01SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN MASTER PLAN FUTURE ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition OA-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 6.02SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN MASTER PLAN FUTURE ADDITION 1ST ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition OA-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 6.03SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN MASTER PLAN FUTURE ADDITION 1ST ADDITION 2ND ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition OA-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 6.04SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN MASTER PLAN FUTURE ADDITION 2ND ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition OA-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 6.05SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN MASTER PLAN FUTURE ADDITION 2ND ADDITION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition OA-ENG-119128-SHEET-SSWR 6.06SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN MASTER PLAN FUTURE ADDITION 1ST ADDITION 2ND ADDITION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition OA-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 7.01STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION MASTER PLAN FUTURE ADDITION 2ND ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION FUTURE ADDITION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 30OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 9-11-2020 PJC/BNM MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type Change Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 9-11-2020 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City Comments 5. 05-27-2021 City Comments6. 06-11-2021 City Comments7. 07-16-2021 2nd Addition OA-ENG-119128-SHEET-STRM 7.02STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION MASTER PLAN c OFTAVERA 2ND ADDITION CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 07-16-2021Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. xx-xx-2021 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2021 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 02-PLAN-119128-SHEET-LAND.DWG 2. 3.4. 1LANDSCAPE PLANJLT/TLM L1 JLT/TLM12-28-2020 1 2 3 4 5 67 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 c 4OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA JLT JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 7-14-2021 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson T1LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTHPLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN TREE PRESERVATION NOTES TREE PROTECTION DETAIL 2 3-19-2021 CITY COMMENTS 6-11-2021 CITY COMMENTS 12-29-2020 7-14-2021 UPDATED 2ND ADDITION, NO CHANGES TO TREE PRESERVATION 3 4 12 13 c 4OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA 12-29-2020 JLT JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson T2LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTHPLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN TREE PRESERVATION NOTES TREE PROTECTION DETAIL 3-19-2021 CITY COMMENTS 2 6-11-2021 CITY COMMENTS 7-14-2021 7-14-2021 UPDATED 2ND ADDITION, NO CHANGES TO TREE PRESERVATION 4 5 12 13 c 4OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA 12-29-2020 JLT JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson T3LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTHPLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN TREE PRESERVATION NOTES TREE PROTECTION DETAIL 3-19-2021 CITY COMMENTS 2 6-11-2021 CITY COMMENTS 7-14-2021 7-14-2021 UPDATED 2ND ADDITION, NO CHANGES TO TREE PRESERVATION c 4OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA 3-19-2021 JLT JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson T4LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTHPLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 TREE EASEMENT LOCATIONS6-11-2021 CITY COMMENTS 7-14-2021 7-14-2021 UPDATED 2ND ADDITION, NO CHANGES TO TREE PRESERVATION CIVIL ENGINEERSLAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORSLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CIVIL ENGINEERSLAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORSLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CIVIL ENGINEERSLAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORSLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS c29OFTAVERACORCORAN, MINNESOTALENNAR16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH9-11-2020PJC/BNMMPCNameReg. No.DateRevisions1. 10-8-2020 Pad Type ChangeDateDesignedDrawn2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS9-11-2020PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV-119128-PREPLAT PUD ADMENDMENT.DWG2. 11-9-2020 Add Demo Plan3. 01-29-2021 City Comments4. 04-09-2021 City CommentsPRELIMINARY PLAT-PUD AMENDMENT2.01 PHA S E 1 G R A D I N G 1 2 5 3 4 5 6 7 8 c OFTAVERA CORCORAN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2020 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 00-PLAN-119128-SHEET-PHASE 1PHASING PLAN 18-27-2021 TLM TLM8-27-2021 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7j. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Prepayment and Redemption of Bond Series 2012A Action Required: Approval Summary: At the September 9th Work Session Council provided direction on the 2022 budget which did not include the 2012A payment as staff proposed calling the 2012A bonds and paying them off with cash. Attached to this report is resolution authorizing that action to take place. It is requested that the Council approve the resolution as presented. Financial/Budget: Calling Bond Series 2012A allowed for a reduction in the debt service levy in 2022 as the City has the ability to prepay the bonds. The cost to call the bonds is approximately $600. Options: 1.Approve Resolution 2021-112 as presented. 2.Decline the bond calling opportunity. Recommendation Approve Resolution 2021-112 as presented. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 2021-112 as presented. Attachments: 1.Resolution 2021-112 Providing for the Prepayment and Redemption of the City’s Outstanding General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2012A EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA Held: September 23, 2021 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was duly called to order on September 23, 2021, at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: and the following members were absent: Member __________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE REDEMPTION OF THE OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS, SERIES 2012A WHEREAS: A. The City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota issued $410,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2012A, dated November 1, 2012; and B. All of said bonds maturing or subject to mandatory redemption on November 1, 2018 through 2022, inclusive, are subject to redemption, in whole or in part, and prepayment at the option of the City on November 1, 2017 and on any date thereafter at par plus accrued interest, all as provided in the resolution of the City authorizing the issuance of said bonds; and C. The City deems it desirable and in the best interest of the City to call $90,000 of the outstanding bonds maturing or subject to mandatory redemption in the years 2021 and 2022 for redemption on October 29, 2021, in accordance with said resolution authorizing the issuance of said bonds, and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota as follows: 1. $90,000 of the General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2012A, dated November 1, 2012, of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, maturing or subject to mandatory redemption in the years 2021 and 2022 shall be redeemed and prepaid on October 29, 2021, at 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest for each such bond called. 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to give mailed notice of call to the bank where said bonds are payable and said bank shall provide such notice to the holders of the bonds as may be required by law. Said notice shall be in substantially the attached form. 3. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to deposit with the bank where said bonds are payable prior to said call date sufficient funds to pay all principal and interest due on the bonds as of the call date. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __________ and upon a vote taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF CORCORAN I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Administrator of the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that I have carefully compared the preceding extract of minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held on the date therein indicated with the original minutes thereof on file in my office and that the same is a full, true and correct transcript thereof insofar as said minutes relate to the topic described in the title of the resolution set forth in the extract. WITNESS my hand officially and the official seal of the City on September 23, 2021. ____________________________________ City Administrator (SEAL) NOTICE OF CALL FOR REDEMPTION GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS, SERIES 2012A DATED: NOVEMBER 1, 2012 CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that by order of the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on OCTOBER 29, 2021 those outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2012A, dated November 1, 2012, maturing or subject to mandatory redemption in the years 2021 and 2022 totaling $90,000 in principal amount and with the following CUSIP number: Maturity Principal Amount CUSIP 2022* $90,000 218388BG0 *This is a Term Bond with a mandatory sinking fund payment in 2021. The bonds are being called for redemption at a price of 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest to October 29, 2021, on which date all interest on said bonds will cease to accrue. Holders of the bonds hereby called for redemption are requested to present their bonds for payment to Northland Trust Services, Inc., 150 South 5th Street, Suite 3300, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, on or before October 29, 2021. Dated: September 23, 2021 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Brad Martens City Administrator Important Notice: In compliance with the Economic Growth and Tax Relief reconciliation Act of 2001, federal backup withholding tax will be withheld at the applicable backup withholding rate in effect at the time of the payment by the redeeming institutions if they are not provided with your social security number or federal employer identification number, properly certified. This requirement is fulfilled by submitting a W-9 Form, which may be obtained at a bank or other financial institution. Additional Information may be obtained from: NORTHLAND SECURITIES, INC. 150 South 5th Street, Suite 3300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Attn: Public Finance Phone: 612-851-5900 or 800-851-2920 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7k. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson Topic: Early Site Grading Work Agreement - Amberly/Bellwether Action Required: Approval Summary: On August 12th, the Council directed staff to work with the city attorney to draft an Early Site Grading Work Agreement template for consideration. Pulte Homes had submitted a request to allow for site grading and trunk sewer installation to take place prior to final plat approval of the Amberly 1st/Bellwether 6th development. Staff does anticipate that other developers will ask for similar approvals. Financial/Budget: Costs incurred to draft the approval were paid by the developer. Options: 1. Approve the Early Site Grading Work Agreement template and authorize staff to execute a final version of the document contingent upon the specified conditions for the proposed Amberly 1st/Bellwether 6th development. 2. Decline the request. Recommendation: Approve the Early Site Grading Work Agreement template and authorize staff to execute a final version of the document contingent upon the specified conditions for the proposed Amberly 1st/Bellwether 6th development. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve the Early Site Grading Work Agreement template and authorize staff to execute a final version of the document contingent upon the specified conditions for the proposed Amberly 1st/Bellwether 6th development. Attachments: 1. Early Site Grading Work Agreement - Template 216846v1 AGREEMENT TO ALLOW EARLY SITE GRADING WORK This AGREEMENT TO ALLOW EARLY SITE GRADING WORK (this “Agreement”) is made this _____ day of ________________, 20__ by and between the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), and ______________________________, a ____________________ (“Developer”), the City and Developer are sometime collectively referred to herein as the “parties” or each a “party”. RECITALS WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of, or has obtained the applicable consent of the owner of the real property described as follows: INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION (the “Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, Developer submitted a preliminary plat application to the City to subdivide the Subject Property and construct INSERT PROJECT DETAILS (the “Development”), which was approved by the Corcoran City Council on ____________; and WHEREAS, Developer intends to request approval of the final plat for Phase ___ of the Development and will enter into one or more agreements with the City governing this Phase of the Development including, but not limited to, a Site Development Agreement which will set forth certain requirements and obligations related to the installation of this Phase of the Development; and WHEREAS, Prior to entering into all required agreements governing the installation of the Development, Developer has requested that the City approve preliminary grading and related work upon the Subject Property for Phase ___, as described in the attached Exhibit “A” (“Early Site Grading Work”); and WHEREAS, the Early Site Grading Work for the approved preliminary plat referred to above is described and depicted in the attached Exhibit “A”, and the City may allow for such preliminary work on the Subject Property, subject to Developer executing this Agreement and providing security as required herein; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.Developer will commence Early Site Grading Work upon the Subject Property only in accordance with the plans and description attached hereto as Exhibit A and to the extent approved by the City Engineer. No work will be undertaken or continued until Developer has: Revised Agenda Item 7k. 2 A. Submitted and has received approval from the City Engineer and the applicable watershed district. B. Resolved with the City Engineer and the watershed district any and all areas where Early Site Grading Work will not be permitted. Developer shall comply with any applicable tree preservation plan with respect to the Subject Property. C. Resolved any outstanding drainage and erosion control issues to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the watershed district. D. Complied with all hours of operation requirements. Hours of operation shall be limited to the construction hours permitted by Corcoran City Code. E. Obtained City approval for all haul routes. Haul routes for vehicles used in transport of materials shall be designated by the City Engineer. The City Engineer has discretion to change the designated haul routes at any time in event of unforeseen circumstances. This Agreement may be terminated and all work on the Subject Property may be halted by the City for Developer’s failure to use the designated haul routes or for any other violation of this Agreement. F. Attended a pre-construction conference with the City Engineer and/or the Public Works Director, or their respective designee. G. Provided to the City a copy of Developer’s NPDES permit and watershed district approval authorizing all of the proposed Early Site Grading Work on the Subject Property. H. Obtained all required approvals related to the Wetland Conservation Act. I. Executed this Agreement and provided to the City all security funds required herein. 2. Developer shall perform all Early Site Grading Work in conformance with the approved plans attached hereto as Exhibit A, as may be amended by the City, Corcoran City Code, the NPDES permit, and any and all watershed requirements. Any work which is not in conformity with approved plans shall be a violation of this Agreement. Developer agrees and hereby grants access to the Subject Properties to the City and watershed district at all reasonable times in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon receipt of verbal or written notice that any work on the Subject Property is not compliant with the approved plans or any amendment to the same deemed necessary by the City or the watershed district and disclosed to Developer, Developer shall immediately make any required changes or immediately cease all work and take whatever 3 restoration actions are required by the City and/or the watershed district. In the event that Developer fails to cease work or undertake or complete required changes or restoration, the City may utilize any and all escrow or security funds posted by Developer under this Agreement to take the required actions, as well as reimburse itself for any costs incurred by the City, including administrative, engineering, and legal fees and costs, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees. 3. Developer will undertake such work with knowledge that approval for construction of private improvements has not yet been granted by City and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a promise or assurance that such approval will be granted. Therefore, all work undertaken prior to approval and full compliance with Corcoran City Code is solely at the risk of Developer. Developer specifically waives all claims or causes of action of whatever nature against the City, its officers, employees, agents or contractors relative to the work undertaken and this Agreement. Further, this Agreement shall not impact, amend, or replace any Master Development Agreement, individual Phase Site Development Agreement, or any other agreement which may be entered into with respect to the Development. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and any other such agreement with respect to the Development, the terms of the other agreement shall control. 4. The Developer shall pay all costs incurred by Developer or the City in conjunction with the Early Site Grading Work on the Subject Property, including but not limited to planning, engineering, legal and inspection expenses incurred related to the acceptance of the work, review of plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the work on the Subject Property. Separate from any posted security, Developer shall deposit ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) with the City in an escrow account to cover the City’s projected costs related to the Early Site Grading Work. Further, at any point during this Agreement, if the City determines that the posted escrow funds are insufficient, the City shall notify Developer to deposit additional funds and Developer shall so deposit the funds within ten (10) days of that notice. Developer’s failure to post the escrow funds requested by the City shall be grounds for termination of this Agreement by the City, and/or shall permit the City to temporarily halt all work on the Subject Property until such funds are deposited. 5. Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims or causes of action of whatever nature related to the Early Site Grading Work on the Subject Property as set forth in this Agreement. Said indemnity and agreement to hold the City harmless includes, but is not limited to, payment of any and all attorneys’ fees, engineering fees, witness fees or any other costs and disbursements related to this Agreement, including any City fees or costs expended to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4 6. Developer hereby agrees to obtain and maintain throughout the duration of any of the Early Site Grading Work on the Subject Property, such duration to include any time necessary for the City to inspect and approve of the work, public liability and property damage insurance coverage covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer’s work or the work of Developer’s contractors or subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Liability limits for bodily injury and death shall not be less than $2,5000,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more.any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City and the City Engineer shall be named as additional insured parties on the policy. Developer shall provide the City with a certificate of insurance evidencing the satisfaction of these requirements and the policy shall mandate that thirty (30) days’ written notice be provided to the City and the City Engineer prior to the effective date of any cancellation or non-renewal of the policy, except in the case of non-payment, in which case ten (10) day’s written notice shall be sufficient. The insurance shall be primary and non-contributory as to any policy maintained by the City of Engineer. 7. In order to ensure compliance with this Agreement, or to assure completion or restoration of the site, Developer shall fully execute and deliver to the City this Agreement and all security required by this Agreement. Specifically, Developer shall deposit with the City all funds listed in the attached Exhibit “B” (the “Security”). Such funds are posted to collectively secure all Early Site Grading Work and use of the same shall not be limited to any itemization listed in said Exhibit “B”. The Security shall be in the form of either a cash deposit or a letter of credit, as determined by the City. If a letter of credit is used, such letter of credit shall be compliant with Corcoran City policies and shall be subject to the approval of the City. The City reserves the right to refuse any letter of credit for any reason whatsoever. Upon fivetwo (52) days’ written notice to Developer, the City may utilize any of the Security funds to complete needed site restoration, except in emergency situations, as determined by the City, which shall permit the City to utilize the Security funds to complete restoration work immediately and without prior written notice. In the event of an emergency situation which results in such action being taken by the City, the City will provide written notice of any such restoration work as soon as reasonably possible. If costs are incurred by the City for restoration above and beyond the amount of the Security, Developer shall be liable for all additional costs, including engineering, planning and legal fees, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, which Developer shall promptly pay upon invoicing, and not later than 30 days after receipt of the invoice. If Developer fails to promptly pay such invoiced amounts, in addition to any other remedy available to the City at law or in equity, the City may recover the amount by drawing upon any other security posted by the Developer for the Development, and Developer hereby consents to such draw. The Security shall 5 only be released upon a determination by the City Engineer that it is no longer required. Failure to maintain the required Security shall be grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement by the City. 8. This Agreement in no way indicates that Development approval beyond the Early Site Grading Work has been granted by the City, and this Agreement shall in no way be construed as evidence of, and in no way implies any such approval. Developer shall make no representations to third parties that this Agreement constitutes or implies that Development approval beyond the Early Site Grading Work as authorized by this Agreement has been granted. 9. Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, and directives of the State of Minnesota, the City, and the watershed district which are applicable to the Subject Property. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Minnesota and any action to enforce the terms contained herein shall be brought in Hennepin County, Minnesota. 10. In the event that any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such provision and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision herein. 11. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement. 12. This Agreement constitutes the entirety of the understanding of the parties related to the Early Site Grading Work contemplated herein. It does not affect, and shall be subordinate to any terms contained within other agreements between the parties, related to the Development, including, but not limited to, a Master Development Agreement or any individual Phase Site Development Agreement. No modifications to this Agreement shall be in effect unless reduced to writing and signed by all parties. 13. For the purposes of providing written notice pursuant to this Agreement, written notice shall be valid if provided via personal service, courier, U.S. Mail, or email to the following: If to the City: Att: Public Works Director Kevin Mattson 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Email: kmattson@corcoranmn.gov With Copy to: 6 Att: City Administrator 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Email: bmartens@corcoranmn.gov If to Developer: INSERT CONTACT & ADDRESS Email: INSERT EMAIL 14. The undersigned signatory hereby represents and warranties that he/she is the designated representative of the Developer and maintains the unqualified authorization to bind the Developer to all terms contained herein. Developer further warranties that Developer is the unencumbered owner of the Subject Property or has obtained the written consent of all owners and/or any parties possessing an interest in the Subject Property, to complete the work contemplated herein, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. [Signatures on pages to follow] 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed as of the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER By: ______________________________ Print:______________________________ Its: _______________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 20__, by ____________________________, the ____________________of_________________________, a _______________________________, on behalf of the _________________________. Notary Public 8 CONSENT OF OWNER ___________________________, as the owner of the Subject Property hereby consents to and subordinates its interest in the Subject Property to the foregoing Agreement dated ______________, 20__. OWNER By: ______________________________ Print:______________________________ Its: _______________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 20__, by ____________________________, the ____________________of_________________________, a _______________________________, on behalf of the _________________________. Notary Public 9 CITY OF CORCORAN By: Brad Martens, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ___________, 20__, by Brad Martens, the City Administrator, of the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: John J. Thames, Esq. CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway, Suite 305 Minneapolis, MN 55430 (763) 561-2800 10 EXHIBIT “A” (Approved Early Site Grading Work Plan and Description of Work) 11 EXHIBIT “B” (The “Security”) 216846v1 AGREEMENT TO ALLOW EARLY SITE GRADING WORK This AGREEMENT TO ALLOW EARLY SITE GRADING WORK (this “Agreement”) is made this _____ day of ________________, 20__ by and between the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), and ______________________________, a ____________________ (“Developer”), the City and Developer are sometime collectively referred to herein as the “parties” or each a “party”. RECITALS WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of, or has obtained the applicable consent of the owner of the real property described as follows: INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION (the “Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, Developer submitted a preliminary plat application to the City to subdivide the Subject Property and construct INSERT PROJECT DETAILS (the “Development”), which was approved by the Corcoran City Council on ____________; and WHEREAS, Developer intends to request approval of the final plat for Phase ___ of the Development and will enter into one or more agreements with the City governing this Phase of the Development including, but not limited to, a Site Development Agreement which will set forth certain requirements and obligations related to the installation of this Phase of the Development; and WHEREAS, Prior to entering into all required agreements governing the installation of the Development, Developer has requested that the City approve preliminary grading and related work upon the Subject Property for Phase ___, as described in the attached Exhibit “A” (“Early Site Grading Work”); and WHEREAS, the Early Site Grading Work for the approved preliminary plat referred to above is described and depicted in the attached Exhibit “A”, and the City may allow for such preliminary work on the Subject Property, subject to Developer executing this Agreement and providing security as required herein; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.Developer will commence Early Site Grading Work upon the Subject Property only in accordance with the plans and description attached hereto as Exhibit A and to the extent approved by the City Engineer. No work will be undertaken or continued until Developer has: Agenda Original Item: 7k. 2 A. Submitted and has received approval from the City Engineer and the applicable watershed district. B. Resolved with the City Engineer and the watershed district any and all areas where Early Site Grading Work will not be permitted. Developer shall comply with any applicable tree preservation plan with respect to the Subject Property. C. Resolved any outstanding drainage and erosion control issues to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the watershed district. D. Complied with all hours of operation requirements. Hours of operation shall be limited to the construction hours permitted by Corcoran City Code. E. Obtained City approval for all haul routes. Haul routes for vehicles used in transport of materials shall be designated by the City Engineer. The City Engineer has discretion to change the designated haul routes at any time in event of unforeseen circumstances. This Agreement may be terminated and all work on the Subject Property may be halted by the City for Developer’s failure to use the designated haul routes or for any other violation of this Agreement. F. Attended a pre-construction conference with the City Engineer and/or the Public Works Director, or their respective designee. G. Provided to the City a copy of Developer’s NPDES permit and watershed district approval authorizing all of the proposed Early Site Grading Work on the Subject Property. H. Obtained all required approvals related to the Wetland Conservation Act. I. Executed this Agreement and provided to the City all security funds required herein. 2. Developer shall perform all Early Site Grading Work in conformance with the approved plans attached hereto as Exhibit A, as may be amended by the City, Corcoran City Code, the NPDES permit, and any and all watershed requirements. Any work which is not in conformity with approved plans shall be a violation of this Agreement. Developer agrees and hereby grants access to the Subject Properties to the City and watershed district at all reasonable times in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon receipt of verbal or written notice that any work on the Subject Property is not compliant with the approved plans or any amendment to the same deemed necessary by the City or the watershed district and disclosed to Developer, Developer shall immediately make any required changes or immediately cease all work and take whatever 3 restoration actions are required by the City and/or the watershed district. In the event that Developer fails to cease work or undertake or complete required changes or restoration, the City may utilize any and all escrow or security funds posted by Developer under this Agreement to take the required actions, as well as reimburse itself for any costs incurred by the City, including administrative, engineering, and legal fees and costs, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees. 3. Developer will undertake such work with knowledge that approval for construction of private improvements has not yet been granted by City and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a promise or assurance that such approval will be granted. Therefore, all work undertaken prior to approval and full compliance with Corcoran City Code is solely at the risk of Developer. Developer specifically waives all claims or causes of action of whatever nature against the City, its officers, employees, agents or contractors relative to the work undertaken and this Agreement. Further, this Agreement shall not impact, amend, or replace any Master Development Agreement, individual Phase Site Development Agreement, or any other agreement which may be entered into with respect to the Development. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and any other such agreement with respect to the Development, the terms of the other agreement shall control. 4. The Developer shall pay all costs incurred by Developer or the City in conjunction with the Early Site Grading Work on the Subject Property, including but not limited to planning, engineering, legal and inspection expenses incurred related to the acceptance of the work, review of plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the work on the Subject Property. Separate from any posted security, Developer shall deposit ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) with the City in an escrow account to cover the City’s projected costs related to the Early Site Grading Work. Further, at any point during this Agreement, if the City determines that the posted escrow funds are insufficient, the City shall notify Developer to deposit additional funds and Developer shall so deposit the funds within ten (10) days of that notice. Developer’s failure to post the escrow funds requested by the City shall be grounds for termination of this Agreement by the City, and/or shall permit the City to temporarily halt all work on the Subject Property until such funds are deposited. 5. Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims or causes of action of whatever nature related to the Early Site Grading Work on the Subject Property as set forth in this Agreement. Said indemnity and agreement to hold the City harmless includes, but is not limited to, payment of any and all attorneys’ fees, engineering fees, witness fees or any other costs and disbursements related to this Agreement, including any City fees or costs expended to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4 6. Developer hereby agrees to obtain and maintain throughout the duration of any of the Early Site Grading Work on the Subject Property, public liability and property damage insurance coverage covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer’s work or the work of Developer’s contractors or subcontractors. Liability limits shall not be less than $2,000,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City and the City Engineer shall be named as additional insured parties on the policy. Developer shall provide the City with a certificate of insurance evidencing the satisfaction of these requirements and the policy shall mandate that thirty (30) days’ written notice be provided to the City and the City Engineer prior to the effective date of any cancellation or non-renewal of the policy, except in the case of non-payment, in which case ten (10) day’s written notice shall be sufficient. 7. In order to ensure compliance with this Agreement, or to assure completion or restoration of the site, Developer shall fully execute and deliver to the City this Agreement and all security required by this Agreement. Specifically, Developer shall deposit with the City all funds listed in the attached Exhibit “B” (the “Security”). Such funds are posted to collectively secure all Early Site Grading Work and use of the same shall not be limited to any itemization listed in said Exhibit “B”. The Security shall be in the form of either a cash deposit or a letter of credit, as determined by the City. If a letter of credit is used, such letter of credit shall be compliant with Corcoran City policies and shall be subject to the approval of the City. The City reserves the right to refuse any letter of credit for any reason whatsoever. Upon two (2) days’ written notice to Developer, the City may utilize any of the Security funds to complete needed site restoration. If costs are incurred by the City for restoration above and beyond the amount of the Security, Developer shall be liable for all additional costs, including engineering, planning and legal fees, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, which Developer shall promptly pay upon invoicing, and not later than 30 days after receipt of the invoice. If Developer fails to promptly pay such invoiced amounts, in addition to any other remedy available to the City at law or in equity, the City may recover the amount by drawing upon any other security posted by the Developer for the Development, and Developer hereby consents to such draw. The Security shall only be released upon a determination by the City Engineer that it is no longer required. Failure to maintain the required Security shall be grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement by the City. 8. This Agreement in no way indicates that Development approval beyond the Early Site Grading Work has been granted by the City, and this Agreement shall in no way be construed as evidence of, and in no way implies any such approval. Developer shall make no representations to third parties that this Agreement constitutes or implies that Development approval beyond the Early Site Grading Work as authorized by this Agreement has been granted. 5 9. Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, and directives of the State of Minnesota, the City, and the watershed district which are applicable to the Subject Property. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Minnesota and any action to enforce the terms contained herein shall be brought in Hennepin County, Minnesota. 10. In the event that any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such provision and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision herein. 11. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement. 12. This Agreement constitutes the entirety of the understanding of the parties related to the Early Site Grading Work contemplated herein. It does not affect, and shall be subordinate to any terms contained within other agreements between the parties, related to the Development, including, but not limited to, a Master Development Agreement or any individual Phase Site Development Agreement. No modifications to this Agreement shall be in effect unless reduced to writing and signed by all parties. 13. For the purposes of providing written notice pursuant to this Agreement, written notice shall be valid if provided via personal service, courier, U.S. Mail, or email to the following: If to the City: Att: Public Works Director Kevin Mattson 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Email: kmattson@corcoranmn.gov With Copy to: Att: City Administrator 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Email: bmartens@corcoranmn.gov If to Developer: INSERT CONTACT & ADDRESS Email: INSERT EMAIL 6 14. The undersigned signatory hereby represents and warranties that he/she is the designated representative of the Developer and maintains the unqualified authorization to bind the Developer to all terms contained herein. Developer further warranties that Developer is the unencumbered owner of the Subject Property or has obtained the written consent of all owners and/or any parties possessing an interest in the Subject Property, to complete the work contemplated herein, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. [Signatures on pages to follow] 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed as of the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER By: ______________________________ Print:______________________________ Its: _______________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 20__, by ____________________________, the ____________________of_________________________, a _______________________________, on behalf of the _________________________. Notary Public 8 CONSENT OF OWNER ___________________________, as the owner of the Subject Property hereby consents to and subordinates its interest in the Subject Property to the foregoing Agreement dated ______________, 20__. OWNER By: ______________________________ Print:______________________________ Its: _______________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 20__, by ____________________________, the ____________________of_________________________, a _______________________________, on behalf of the _________________________. Notary Public 9 CITY OF CORCORAN By: Brad Martens, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ___________, 20__, by Brad Martens, the City Administrator, of the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: John J. Thames, Esq. CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway, Suite 305 Minneapolis, MN 55430 (763) 561-2800 10 EXHIBIT “A” (Approved Early Site Grading Work Plan and Description of Work) 11 EXHIBIT “B” (The “Security”) City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-102 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is authorized to accept donations of real or personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 456.03 for the benefit of citizens, and is specifically authorized to accept gifts; and WHEREAS, the City received a monetary donation in the amount of $133.00 from Lola and Kacey Hedburg’s lemonade stand proceeds and is allocated to the Corcoran Police Department; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donation as offered for the benefit of the City of Corcoran, and residents; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Corcoran acknowledges the generosity of Lola and Kacey Hedburg and graciously accepts the donation. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23th day of September, 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City Seal Agenda Item: 7l. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7m. Council Meeting: September 23rd, 2021 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Special Event Request – Stanchion Bar Action Required: Approval Summary: The City received an inquiry from the Ms. Monnens, owner of the Stanchion, regarding hosting an event at the Stanchion on October 2, 2021. Ms. Monnens is interested in hosting an event in which a tent would be placed on the property with a fenced in area, possibly having outside music during the daytime event. A temporary extension of the liquor license for the event would need to be granted in order to expand liquor consumption area. Fencing would need to be placed around the tent and surrounding area to meet state requirements for a compact and contiguous location. Ms. Monnens has provided proof of additional insurance for the temporary liquor license extension. No noise exemption is requested at this time. Financial/Budget: N/A Options: 1. Approve a temporary liquor license amendment for the Stanchion Bar on October 2, 2021. 2. Deny a temporary liquor license amendment for the Stanchion Bar on October 2, 2021. 3. Send the request back to staff for further review. Council Action: 1. Approve a temporary liquor license amendment for the Stanchion Bar on October 2, 2021. Attachments: N/A 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 8a. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Nicholas Ouellette through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: September 13, 2021 for the September 23, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: PUBLIC HEARING. Amendment to Chapter 82 (Nuisances) of the City Code Related to Outside Storage (city file no. 21-032) REVIEW DEADLINE: NA 1.Description of Request City Council has directed staff to amend Chapter 82 (Nuisances) of the City Code to ease storage restrictions for recreational vehicles, personal recreational vehicles, off-road vehicles (ORVs), unoccupied trailers, firewood and lots with double frontages to allow some storage in front yards. 2.City Council Review City Council reviewed this item at their July 8, 2021 meeting and one resident spoke about code enforcement during the public comment period. City Council reviewed the report and draft ordinance amendment options prepared by staff and the City Attorney. Council directed staff to modify the draft ordinance to allow for the front yard storage of no more than two of any recreational vehicle, personal recreational vehicle, ORV or unoccupied trailer in the front yard. Council directed staff to proceed with the 25 ft. setback option. City Council directed staff to proceed with a Public Hearing at the City Council meeting. 3. Background City Council discussed code enforcement and nuisance standards for outside storage at their June 10, 2021 meeting. The context for this discussion was the large number residents receiving violation notices for improper storage of recreational vehicles or other violations of the City Code nuisance standards. The City Council directed staff to draft an amendment to the City Code to ease front yard storage restrictions for recreational vehicles and firewood and for lots with double frontages. Storage of recreational vehicles in the front yard is a common code violation throughout Corcoran, particularly in the summer season during which recreational vehicles are frequently used by residents and stored on their property for convenience. 4.Analysis Staff has reviewed City Code from a dozen municipalities in the region to understand how other communities address front yard storage and storage of recreational vehicles. Hanover, Rogers and Nuisance Ordinance Amendments (21-032) 2 September 23, 2021 Shorewood have well organized nuisance code sections that were used to inform the proposed amendment. Of the twelve cities staff reviewed for ordinance regarding outside storage, the following findings were made: Standard Number of Cities Restricts the storage of RV's to only the side or rear yard 4 Allows the storage of RV's in the front yard 8 Front yard storage of RV's allowed on an improved surface or driveway 8 Front yard storage of RV's with minimum front yard setbacks (≥ 15 ft.) 2 Front yard storage of RV's restricted to back half of the front yard 2 Front yard storage of RV's restricted on a seasonal basis (summer/winter) 1 Restricts the number of RVs that may be stored on a property 7 Council requested the following nuisance standards be addressed through the proposed amendment: 1. Allow storage of recreational vehicles in the front yard to reduce the number of rural residents in violation of City Code for storage of recreational vehicles. At their July 8 meeting, City Council directed staff to include personal recreational vehicles, ORVs and unoccupied trailers as allowed storage in the front yard. Council directed staff to allow for up to two of the aforementioned vehicles or unoccupied trailers to be stored in the front yard. 2. Allow storage of firewood in the front yard. 3. Reduce the burden of limited options for outside storage on lots with double frontage, where both street frontages are considered front yards and storage options are limited. The following amendment to Chapter 82, “Nuisances”, are proposed to address the nuisance standards discussed by City Council. Proposed Amendment to Chapter 82.02: Definitions The proposed addition of “unoccupied trailer” to Chapter 82.02 will provide clarity on which items allowed for storage in the front yard. The proposed amendment to “personal recreational vehicle” in Chapter 82.02 will make the definition in this section consistent with the definition for “personal recreational vehicle” in Chapter 72.11 of the City Code. The proposed addition of the following definitions to Chapter 82.02 will allow parcels with frontage on two streets to consider one of the front yards as a side yard for storage purposes. By allowing corner lots to consider one of the front yards a side yard for the purposes of outside storage, it will reduce the number of front yard storage violations and code violation notices issued to properties with double frontages. Staff proposed the addition and amendment of the following definitions; the underlined portion indicates added text and the stricken portion indicates deleted text: Nuisance Ordinance Amendments (21-032) 3 September 23, 2021 LOT LINE: The property line bounding a lot except that where any portion of a lot extends into an easement for public right-of-way, the line of such public right-of-way shall be the lot line for applying this Ordinance. LOT LINE, FRONT: That boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street or private drive easement, and in the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or private drive easement. If the dimensions of a corner lot are reasonably equal, the front lot line shall be designated by the owner and filed with the City. However, all front lot lines shall be subject to the front setback requirements. LOT LINE, REAR: That boundary of a lot which is opposite the front lot line. If the rear line is less than 10 feet in length, or if the lot forms a point at the rear, the rear lot line shall be a line 10 feet in length within the lot, parallel to, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. LOT LINE, SIDE: Any boundary of a lot which is not a front lot line or a rear lot line. LOT LINE, WIDTH: The maximum horizontal distance between the side lot lines of a lot measured at the required front lot line or ordinary high water level of the shoreline. PERSONAL RECREATIONAL VEHICLE.A snowmobile, all-terrain vehicle (ATV), golf cart, go carts or dune buffy with or without machine propelled power and designed for recreation. All- terrain vehicles, utility task vehicles, golf carts, snowmobiles, off-highway motorcycles, mini- bikes, go-carts, and other motorized vehicles that by their use fit this definition. UNNOCUPIED TRAILER. A trailer designed to be pulled by an automobile, van, or pick-up truck and used to transport personal property. YARD, FRONT: An area extending the full width of a lot between the front line and the nearest principal structure. For the purposes of Chapter 82.04 Subd. 3., a corner lot shall have one front yard and it shall be the area extending the full width of a lot between the principal structure and the front lot line with driveway access to the principal structure. Nuisance Ordinance Amendments (21-032) 4 September 23, 2021 Figure A Figure B The example property in Figures A and B is a corner lot and demonstrates how the proposed amendment affects the interpretation of front, side, and rear yards. Green corresponds with the front yard, blue with the side yard and red with the rear yard. • Figure A demonstrates how front, side and rear yards are determined for corner lots under the current City Code. As a corner lot with two front property lines the front yard covers most of the property and outside storage is limited. • Figure B demonstrates how front, side and rear yards would be determined for corner lots under the proposed amendment. The front yard is situated between the property line with driveway access leading to the principal structure. This could allow for storage of an RV in the front yard on the driveway. The side and year yard now extend to the secondary front property line and allows more area to be used for outside storage. Proposed Amendment to Chapter 82.04: Storage Nuisance, Subd. 3.C. and Subd. 3.G. The proposed amendment to Chapter 82.04, Subd. 3.C. addresses the Council’s desire to allow recreational vehicles, personal recreational vehicles, ORVs, and unoccupied trailers for storage in the front yard. The proposed amendment allows residents to store no more than two of any recreational vehicle, personal recreational vehicle, ORV and unoccupied trailer in the front yard, provided they comply with a minimum setback of 25 ft. from the property line. The minimum setback of 25 ft. is half the minimum setback required for principal and accessory structures in the Urban Reserve and Rural Residential districts. The proposed amendment effectively prohibits the storage of recreational vehicles in the front yard in Corcoran’s urban neighborhoods where the minimum principal structure setbacks are less than 25 ft. from the front property line. Furthermore, many of Corcoran’s urban neighborhoods have homeowners’ associations that make and enforce additional rules for exterior storage in their neighborhoods. These items allowed to be stored in the front yard with this amendment are defined as follows: Nuisance Ordinance Amendments (21-032) 5 September 23, 2021 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE. A motor home, travel trailer, truck camper, or camping trailer with or without machine propelled power designed for temporary living quarters for recreation, camping, or travel. PERSONAL RECREATIONAL VEHICLE. All-terrain vehicles, utility task vehicles, golf carts, snowmobiles, off-highway motorcycles, mini-bikes, go-carts, and other motorized vehicles, that by their use fit this definition. OFF-ROAD VEHICLE (ORV). Motorized recreational vehicles capable of cross-country travel on natural terrain. Vehicles not considered ORVs include snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), off- highway motorcycles (OHMs), motorcycles, watercraft, or aircraft. Farm, logging, military, emergency, law enforcement, utility, trail grooming, and construction vehicles are not considered to be ORVs when used for their intended purposes. UNNOCUPIED TRAILER. A trailer designed to be pulled by an automobile, van, or pick-up truck and used to transport personal property. The proposed amendment to Chapter 82.04, Subd. 3.G., would allow storage of wood in the front yard as desired by the City Council. Staff proposes Chapter 82.04, Subd. 3., “Storage Nuisance”, be amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: A. Construction materials, including, but not limited to, piles of dirt, sand, lumber, bricks, concrete blocks or sod, left in the open on property more than 60 days after construction has been completed or a certificate of occupancy has been issued, whichever occurred first. B. Discarded construction material or other litter at a construction site that is not placed in an adequate waste container or that is allowed to blow around or off the site. C. A recreational vehicle, personal recreational vehicle, ORV, and unoccupied trailer is considered a storage nuisance when remaining in the same location for 72 hours. Except that: 1. rRecreational vehicles, personal recreational vehicles, ORVs and unoccupied trailers may be stored in the side or rear yard, provided they comply with a minimum setback of 10 feet. 1.2. No more than two of any recreational vehicle, personal recreational vehicle, ORV, and unoccupied trailer may be stored in the front yard, provided it is stored on an improved surface and complies with a minimum setback of 25 feet from the front property line. Nuisance Ordinance Amendments (21-032) 6 September 23, 2021 D. Vehicles may be stored in the side or rear yard, provided they comply with a minimum setback of 10 feet and are screened according to Chapter 1060.070. E. In accordance with City Code governing junk vehicles there shall be no collection of junk or inoperable vehicles as defined in chapter 80, unused or unusable motor vehicle bodies, parts and engines and related accessories, with the exception of appropriately licensed pioneer, classic or collector vehicles as defined in Minn. Stat. § 168.10. F. The accumulation of rubbish, waste matter, disused furniture, appliances, machinery, automobiles and parts thereof, accumulations, which may become a harborage for rats, snakes or vermin or which may be conducive to fire, or which endangers the health, safety or welfare of the public or otherwise not allowed by Section 1060.010. G. Wood for burning in a fireplace, stove, furnace, or recreational fire site shall be considered a nuisance unless it is properly stored as follows: 1. In a neat and secure stack, not exceeding 4 feet in height. 2. The wood stack is not infested with rodents. 3. The wood is not kept in a front yard. Nuisance Ordinance Amendments (21-032) 7 September 23, 2021 Code Violation Compliance Examples Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 This is a complicated quality of life issue and the draft ordinance addresses the Council’s desire to allow some recreational vehicle storage in the front yard while respecting other neighboring landowners view. Unfortunately, there is no one solution that will allow every landowner to continue to store these vehicles in the current locations. For example, the recreational vehicles stored in Figures 1 through 4 were stored in the front yard in violation of the current Storage Nuisance Ordinance. • The recreational vehicle in Figure 1 is stored on an improved surface and would comply with the proposed amendment. • The recreational vehicle in Figure 2 would not comply with the proposed amendment because it cannot meet the proposed 25 ft. setback and must be stored in the side or rear yard to comply with City Code. Nuisance Ordinance Amendments (21-032) 8 September 23, 2021 • The recreational vehicle in Figure 3 is stored on an unimproved surface in the front yard in violation of City Code. The vehicle in Figure 3 cannot be stored in the front yard in compliance with the required setbacks, but could be stored towards the back of the driveway in compliance with the 25 ft. setback. • The recreational vehicle in Figure 4 is stored on an improved surface in compliance with the 25 ft. setback and would comply with the proposed amendment. Under the proposed ordinance amendment, approximately 70% of 2021 violation notices for recreational vehicles stored in the front yard would be considered compliant with City Code and approximately 70% of notices for storage violations on lots with double frontages would be considered complaint. With the amended Nuisance Ordinance, vehicles must still display valid license plates and registration tabs and be stored on an improved surface, therefore, a percentage of the 2021 violation notices for recreational vehicles would remain out of compliance with these standards. However, these noncompliant violation notices are more easily resolved, for example, by moving a recreational vehicle from an unimproved surface to a driveway. Additionally, the change would allow a second RV, boat, snowmobile trailer, ATV or similar piece of equipment to be stored in the front yard. Conclusion Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment with the City Attorney. Staff and the City Attorney find the proposed amendment meets City Councils goals to: 1. Allow storage of recreational vehicles, personal recreational vehicles, ORVs and unoccupied trailers in the front yard to reduce the number of rural residents in violation of City Code for storage of these items in the front yard. 2. Allow storage of firewood in the front yard. 3. Reduce the burden of limited options for outside storage on lots with double frontage. Staff find the proposed amendment to Chapter 82.04 Subd. 3. is consistent across all zoning districts and properties and easy to identify in the field for staff to enforce City Code. 5. Recommendation Move to adopt the following: a. Ordinance 2021-432 Approving Ordinance Amendment b. Resolution 2021-103 Approving Findings of Fact for Ordinance Amendment c. Summary Ordinance 2021-433 for Summary Publication Approval of the Amendment Ordinance requires a 3/5 vote of the City Council. Approval of the Findings of Fact Resolution requires 3/5 vote of the City Council. Approval of the Summary Publication Ordinance requires a 4/5 vote of the City Council. Nuisance Ordinance Amendments (21-032) 9 September 23, 2021 Attachments 1. Ordinance 2021-432 Amending the Text of Chapter 82 of the Corcoran City Code 2. Resolution 2021-103 Approving Findings of Fact for an Ordinance Amending the Text of Chapter 82 of the Corcoran City Code 3. Summary of Ordinance 2021-433 for Publication 4. Redlined Chapter 82 “Nuisances” City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-432 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 82 (NUISANCES) OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE NO. 21-032) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 82.02 “Definitions” (Nuisances) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined materials as follows: LOT LINE. The property line bounding a lot except that where any portion of a lot extends into an easement for public right-of-way, the line of such public right-of-way shall be the lot line for applying this Ordinance. LOT LINE, FRONT. That boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street or private drive easement, and in the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or private drive easement. If the dimensions of a corner lot are reasonably equal, the front lot line shall be designated by the owner and filed with the City. However, all front lot lines shall be subject to the front setback requirements. LOT LINE, REAR. That boundary of a lot which is opposite the front lot line. If the rear line is less than 10 feet in length, or if the lot forms a point at the rear, the rear lot line shall be a line 10 feet in length within the lot, parallel to, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. LOT LINE, SIDE. Any boundary of a lot which is not a front lot line or a rear lot line. LOT LINE, WIDTH. The maximum horizontal distance between the side lot lines of a lot measured at the required front lot line or ordinary high water level of the shoreline. PERSONAL RECREATIONAL VEHICLE. A snowmobile, all-terrain vehicle (ATV), golf cart, go carts or dune buggy with or without machine propelled power and designed for recreation.All-terrain vehicles, utility task vehicles, golf carts, snowmobiles, off-highway motorcycles, mini-bikes, go-carts, and other motorized vehicles, that by their use fit this definition. UNNOCUPIED TRAILER. A trailer designed to be pulled by an automobile, van, or pick- up truck and used to transport personal property. YARD, FRONT. An area extending the full width of a lot between the front line and the nearest principal structure. For the purposes of Chapter 82.04, Subd. 3., a corner lot shall have one front yard and it shall be the area extending the full width of a lot between the principal structure and the front lot line with driveway access to the principal structure. SECTION 2. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 82.04 Subd. 3 “Actions Constituting Public Nuisances” (Nuisances) of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined materials as follows: City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-432 Page 2 of 3 A. Construction materials, including, but not limited to, piles of dirt, sand, lumber, bricks, concrete blocks or sod, left in the open on property more than 60 days after construction has been completed or a certificate of occupancy has been issued, whichever occurred first. B. Discarded construction material or other litter at a construction site that is not placed in an adequate waste container or that is allowed to blow around or off the site. C. A recreational vehicle, personal recreational vehicle, ORV, and unoccupied trailer is considered a storage nuisance when remaining in the same location for 72 hours. Except that: 1. rRecreational vehicles, personal recreational vehicles, ORVs and unoccupied trailers may be stored in the side or rear yard, provided they comply with a minimum setback of 10 feet. 1.2. No more than two of any recreational vehicle, personal recreational vehicle, ORV, and unoccupied trailer may be stored in the front yard, provided it is stored on an improved surface and complies with a minimum setback of 25 feet from the front property line. D. Vehicles may be stored in the side or rear yard, provided they comply with a minimum setback of 10 feet and are screened according to Chapter 1060.070. E. In accordance with City Code governing junk vehicles there shall be no collection of junk or inoperable vehicles as defined in chapter 80, unused or unusable motor vehicle bodies, parts and engines and related accessories, with the exception of appropriately licensed pioneer, classic or collector vehicles as defined in Minn. Stat. § 168.10. F. The accumulation of rubbish, waste matter, disused furniture, appliances, machinery, automobiles and parts thereof, accumulations, which may become a harborage for rats, snakes or vermin or which may be conducive to fire, or which endangers the health, safety or welfare of the public or otherwise not allowed by Section 1060.010. G. Wood for burning in a fireplace, stove, furnace, or recreational fire site shall be considered a nuisance unless it is properly stored as follows: 1. In a neat and secure stack, not exceeding 4 feet in height. 2. The wood stack is not infested with rodents. 3. The wood is not kept in a front yard. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-432 Page 3 of 3 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared and adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 82 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 21-032) WHEREAS, the Corcoran City Council has requested an amendment to Chapter 82 (Nuisances) to allow storage in front yards; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment would be consistent with other City Code standards and City policies; and WHEREAS, the amendments make edits to reflect the Council’s vision to ease storage restrictions for Corcoran residents; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed text amendments at a duly called Public Hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, that it does approve an amendment to Chapter 82 (Nuisances) of the City Code to amend outside storage regulations, based on the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment would reduce the burden of limited options for outside storage on lots with more than one street frontage. 2. The proposed amendment would allow storage of wood, recreational vehicles, personal recreational vehicles, off-road vehicles and unoccupied trailers in the front yard in a manner consistent with the rural character of Corcoran. 3. The proposed amendment would reduce the number of City Code violations related to front yard storage. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103 Page 2 of 2 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-433 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2021-432 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 82 OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO FRONT YARD STORAGE STANDARDS (CITY FILE 21-032) The text of Chapter 82 of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended to revise definitions and standards for storage in front yards. A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director NUISANCES FINDINGS AND PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter of the City Code is to prohibit certain conduct that is harmful to the health, safety and welfare of the community and to prevent and abate nuisance conduct, events, characteristics or conditions and their harmful effects on city neighborhoods. The City Council finds that excessive noise, disruption and other public nuisance activities are injurious to the public health, safety and welfare and interfere with the quiet enjoyment of life and property. Nothing herein is meant to limit constitutional rights under the federal or state constitution. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning. ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. Code Compliance Official, member of city staff, or persons authorized by the City to enforce the provisions of this chapter. GARBAGE. All putrescible animal, vegetable or other matter, including the cans, containers or wrappers wasted along with such materials. LOT LINE. The property line bounding a lot except that where any portion of a lot extends into an easement for public right-of-way, the line of such public right-of-way shall be the lot line for applying this Ordinance. LOT LINE, FRONT. That boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street or private drive easement, and in the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or private drive easement. If the dimensions of a corner lot are reasonably equal, the front lot line shall be designated by the owner and filed with the City. However, all front lot lines shall be subject to the front setback requirements. LOT LINE, REAR. That boundary of a lot which is opposite the front lot line. If the rear line is less than 10 feet in length, or if the lot forms a point at the rear, the rear lot line shall be a line 10 feet in length within the lot, parallel to, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. LOT LINE, SIDE. Any boundary of a lot which is not a front lot line or a rear lot line. LOT LINE, WIDTH. The maximum horizontal distance between the side lot lines of a lot measured at the required front lot line or ordinary high water level of the shoreline. OWNER. Any person, firm, corporation, or other partnership or organization who alone, jointly, or severally with others may be in ownership of, or have charge, care, or control of, any premises or business within the City as owner, employee or agent of the owner, or as trustee or guardian of the estate or person of the title holder. OFF-ROAD VEHICLE (ORV). Motorized recreational vehicles capable of cross-country travel on natural terrain. Vehicles not considered ORVs include snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), off-highway motorcycles (OHMs), motorcycles, watercraft, or aircraft. Farm, logging, military, emergency, law enforcement, utility, trail grooming, and construction vehicles are not considered to be ORVs when used for their intended purposes. PROPERTY. A parcel or contiguous parcels of real property, including buildings and other structures thereon owned by the same legal entity and under common management. In the case of multi-unit residential or commercial property, the term shall apply to the entire complex. PERSONAL RECREATIONAL VEHICLE. A snowmobile, all-terrain vehicle (ATV), golf cart, go carts or dune buggy with or without machine propelled power and designed for recreation.All-terrain vehicles, utility task vehicles, golf carts, snowmobiles, off-highway motorcycles, mini-bikes, go-carts, and other motorized vehicles, that by their use fit this definition. PUBLIC PLACE. An area generally visible to public view, including streets, sidewalks, bridges, alleys, plazas, parks, driveways, parking lots, automobiles (whether moving or not) and buildings open to the general public, including those buildings in which food or drink is served or entertainment or lodging is provided. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE. A motor home, travel trailer, truck camper, or camping trailer with or without machine propelled power designed for temporary living quarters for recreation, camping, or travel. REFUSE. All putrescible and non-putrescible solid waste (except body waste) including, but not limited to, garbage, rubbish, ashes, street cleanings, abandoned automobiles, automobile parts, tires, demolition and construction debris, and market and industrial solid waste. REFUSE ENCLOSURE. An enclosure capable of containing all refuse and garbage stored by an establishment between pickups. All refuse enclosure construction plans shall be approved by the Building Official. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. Any real property containing a structure suitable for affording shelter for human beings, including any appurtenant or connected structure, including trailers, mobile homes, multiple-family dwellings, buildings containing multiple dwelling units and any property situated within a residential zoning district, as defined by this City Code. RUBBISH. Non-putrescible solid wastes such as wood, leaves, trimmings from shrubs, dead trees or branches thereof, shavings, sawdust, excelsior, wooden waste, printed matter, paper, paper board, paste board, grass, rags, straw, boots, shoes, hats and all other combustibles not included under the term garbage. UNNOCUPIED TRAILER. A trailer designed to be pulled by an automobile, van, or pick-up truck and used to transport personal property. VEHICLE. A self-propelled machine designed and originally manufactured to operate primarily on roadways and shall include, automobiles, trucks, and motorcycles. WASTE MATTER. Non-putrescible solid waste such as soil, earth, sand, clay, gravel, loam, stone, brick, plaster, crockery, glass, glassware, ashes, cinders, shells, metal, and all other noncombustible material which has been or is to be discarded. WEEDS, and RANK VEGETATION. Includes but is not limited to the following: 1. Noxious weeds and rank vegetation shall include but not be limited to: alum (alliums), Buckthorn, Bur Cucumber, Canada Thistle, Corn cockle, Cress leaf Groundsel, Curly Dock, Dodder, Field Bindweed, French Weed, Hairy White top, Hedge Bindweed, Hoary Cress, Horse nettle, Johnson grass, Leafy Spurge, Mile-A-Minute Weed, Musk Thistle, Oxeye Daisy, Perennial Sow thistle, Poison Hemlock, Purple Loosestrife, Quack grass, Russian Knapweed, Russian Thistle, Serrated Tussock, Shatter Cane, Wild Carrot, Wild Garlic, Wild Mustard, Wild Onion, Wild Parsnip, Velvet weed, Bull Thistle, Chokeberries, Burning Nettles 2. Rank vegetation includes the uncontrolled, uncultivated growth of annuals and perennial plants. 3. In no event shall cultivated plants or crops include plants that have been defined by state statute or administrative rule as being noxious or detrimental plants. YARD, FRONT. An area extending the full width of a lot between the front line and the nearest principal structure. For the purposes of Chapter 82.04, Subd. 3., a corner lot shall have one front yard and it shall be the area extending the full width of a lot between the principal structure and the front lot line with driveway access to the principal structure. DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC NUISANCE The enforcement officer may apply and enforce any provision of this chapter relating to public nuisances within this jurisdiction. The enforcement officer or other designated City official shall have the power to inspect private premises and take all reasonable precautions to prevent the commission and maintenance of public nuisances. Except in emergency situations of imminent danger to human life or public safety, or to facilitate, after proper notice, the abatement of a weed nuisance as defined by section 82.04 subd. 7 of this chapter, or as otherwise authorized by law, no enforcement officer or designated City official will enter private property for the purpose of inspecting or preventing public nuisances without the permission of the owner, resident or other person in control of the property, unless the officer or person designated has obtained a warrant or order from a court of competent jurisdiction authorizing entry or for the purpose of making preliminary contact. ACTIONS CONSTITUTING PUBLIC NUISANCES Subd. 1. In addition to those activities or conditions which fall within the definition of a nuisance in Minn. Stat. § 609.74, as it may be amended from time to time, all acts described, regulated and prohibited in the provisions of this section are hereby deemed to be, and are hereby declared to be, nuisances. Any person who shall cause or create any nuisance or permit a nuisance to be created to or to be placed upon or remain upon any premises shall, upon conviction thereof, be guilty of a misdemeanor. It shall be a misdemeanor for anyone to aid, abet, advise, encourage or assist another to violate any of the provisions of this section. All of such acts shall constitute misdemeanors. In addition, the City may enforce this section by injunctive action or other appropriate civil remedy. The following property conditions are declared to be nuisances affecting public peace, welfare and safety. Subd. 2. Public Obstruction Nuisance A. All snow and ice not removed from public sidewalks within 24 hours after the snow and ice has ceased to be deposited thereon. Snow and ice remaining after 24 hours may be removed by the city or city’s contractor and the property owner shall be liable for all costs for removal. B. All limbs of trees which are less than eight feet above the surface of any public sidewalk or nine feet above the surface of any street. C. The allowing of rain water, ice or snow to repeatedly fall from any building or structure upon any street or sidewalk or to flow across any sidewalk. D. Depositing or storing snow or ice in the public right of way. E. Obstructions and excavations affecting the ordinary use of a public street, alley, sidewalk, public right of way, or other public property, except by a public agency or private contractor approved by the Public Works Director or designee. F. An unsecured hole or opening caused by an abandoned cistern, well pit, sewage treatment system, unused or non-maintained swimming pool, foundation, mine shaft or tunnel, or any other hole or opening in the ground of sufficient size or depth to pose a danger to the public or an attractive nuisance Subd. 3. Storage Nuisance A. Construction materials, including, but not limited to, piles of dirt, sand, lumber, bricks, concrete blocks or sod, left in the open on property more than 60 days after construction has been completed or a certificate of occupancy has been issued, whichever occurred first. B. Discarded construction material or other litter at a construction site that is not placed in an adequate waste container or that is allowed to blow around or off the site. C. A recreational vehicle, personal recreational vehicle, ORV, and unoccupied trailer is considered a storage nuisance when remaining in the same location for 72 hours. Except that: 1. rRecreational vehicles, personal recreational vehicles, ORVs and unoccupied trailers may be stored in the side or rear yard, provided they comply with a minimum setback of 10 feet. 1.2.No more than two of any recreational vehicle, personal recreational vehicle, ORV, and unoccupied trailer may be stored in the front yard, provided it is stored on an improved surface and complies with a minimum setback of 25 feet from the front property line. C.D. Vehicles may be stored in the side or rear yard, provided they comply with a minimum setback of 10 feet and are screened according to Chapter 1060.070. D.E. In accordance with City Code governing junk vehicles there shall be no collection of junk or inoperable vehicles as defined in chapter 80, unused or unusable motor vehicle bodies, parts and engines and related accessories, with the exception of appropriately licensed pioneer, classic or collector vehicles as defined in Minn. Stat. § 168.10. E.F. The accumulation of rubbish, waste matter, disused furniture, appliances, machinery, automobiles and parts thereof, accumulations, which may become a harborage for rats, snakes or vermin or which may be conducive to fire, or which endangers the health, safety or welfare of the public or otherwise not allowed by Section 1060.010. F.G. Wood for burning in a fireplace, stove, furnace, or recreational fire site shall be considered a nuisance unless it is properly stored as follows: 1. In a neat and secure stack, not exceeding 4 feet in height. 2. The wood stack is not infested with rodents. 3. The wood is not kept in a front yard. Subd. 4. Parking Nuisance A. A person must not cause, undertake, permit, or allow the outside parking of vehicles on residential property unless it complies with the following requirements: 1. Vehicles that are parked or outside in the front yard areas must be on a paved, gravel, or otherwise improved parking surface or driveway area. 2. Vehicles stored outside on residential property must be owned by a person who resides on that property. Students who are away attending school for periods of time but still claim the property as their legal residence will be considered residents on the property. 3. A vehicle is considered to be parked if it remains in one location for less than 72 hours. For the purposes of this section a vehicle is considered to be stored when remaining in one location for 72 hours or more. Subd. 5. Noise Nuisance A. No person shall make or cause to be made any distinctly and loudly audible noise that unreasonably, disturbs, injures, or endangers the, repose, health, peace, safety, or welfare of any person or precludes their enjoyment of property or affects their property’s value. This general prohibition shall not be limited by the specific restriction of the following sections: 1. Any noise that is in violation of Minn. Rule 7030.0030, as may be amended from time to time. 2. No person shall sound any audible signaling device on any vehicle except as a warning of danger pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 169.68. 3. No person shall discharge the exhaust or permit the discharge of the exhaust of any steam engine, stationary internal combustion engine, motorboat, motor vehicle, or snowmobile, except through a muffler or other device that effectively prevents loud or explosive noises there from and complies with all applicable State laws and regulations. 4. No person shall use any vehicle so out of repair or so loaded as to create loud and unnecessary grating, grinding, rattling or other noise. 5. No person shall use or operate or permit the use or operation of any radio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, paging system, machine, loudspeaker, sound amplifier, or other device for the production or reproduction of sound in a distinct and loudly audible manner as to disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of any person nearby. 6. No person shall operate a motor vehicle within the City in violation of the motor vehicle noise limits of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, or in violation of any Section of this Code relating to motor vehicles. 7. No person shall participate in any party or other gathering of people giving rise to unreasonable noise, disturbing the peace, quiet or repose of another person. When an Enforcement Officer determines that a gathering is creating such a noise disturbance, the officer may order all persons present, other than the owner or tenant of the premises on which the disturbance is occurring, to disperse immediately. No person shall refuse to leave after being ordered to by the enforcement officer to do so. Every owner or tenant of such premises, who has knowledge of the disturbance, shall make every reasonable effort to see that the disturbance is stopped. 8. No person shall operate or permit the use or operation of any loudspeaker, sound amplifier, or other device for the production or reproduction of sound on a street or other public place for the purpose of commercial advertising or attracting the attention of the public to any commercial establishment or vehicle. 9. No person shall keep any animal that disturbs the comfort or repose of any person in the vicinity by its frequent or continued noise as regulated by Chapter 81 of this code. 10. Construction activities between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on Monday through Friday, and 9:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends and holidays, including the operation of any pile driver, pneumatic hammer, derrick, steam or electric hoist, bulldozer, or other equipment or tools, the use of which is attended by loud or unusual noise, shall be prohibited. 11. The operation of outdoor power implements, including but not limited to an electric- or gas-powered implement such as a lawn mower, hedge clipper, chain saw, trimmer, leaf blower/vacuum, or other device designed primarily for outdoor use between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. shall be prohibited. All implements shall be effectively muffled so as to prevent the emission of loud and explosive noises. The above restriction does not include the operation of Agriculture related equipment and any power implement utilized for snow removal within 12 hours of the end of a snow event. B. waiver of these requirements can be obtained from the City Administrator or designee. The person wishing to receive exception to these rules to conduct necessary business may make a written application to the City stating when, why, and for how long the noise producing activity shall be conducted. If the request is denied by the City Administrator or designee, the applicant may appeal the decision to the City Council by appearing before the Council during a regular Council meeting. Subd. 6. Building Nuisance A. Any structure that has become dangerous for further occupancy because of structural or sanitary defects or grossly unsanitary conditions. B. Accumulations in permanent dwellings to such an extent preventing emergency egress. C. The existence of any manufactured home, building or portion of a building which has stood with an incomplete exterior shell for longer than one year; or any building or a portion thereof which is: 1. Open to entry by persons without the use of tools or ladders; 2. A structure with multiple exterior housing code or building code violations; 3. A structure containing unfinished additions or partitions or any other unfinished structure; and 4. A dangerous structure, meaning any structure which is potentially dangerous to persons or property including, but not limited to a structure in danger of partial or complete collapse, or a structure which has parts such as porches, stairs, ramps and floors or roofs which are accessible and which are either collapsed, in danger of collapsing or not able to carry their designed weight. Subd. 7. Weed Nuisance A. Maintenance of grass or weeds on a property at a height of more than 12 inches, except: 1. on slopes in excess of 3:1 within residential properties; 2. wetlands; 3. wetland buffers; 4. areas maintained in prairie or other native vegetation; 5. areas subject to a conservation or similar easement; and 6. publicly owned parks, trails or nature areas. 7. on those portions of a property actively farmed or used for agricultural purposes. B. The weed nuisance may be abated following the procedure outlined in Section 82.05 Subd. 3. Subd. 8. Garbage and Refuse Nuisance A. The existence of refuse or garbage, noxious substances or hazardous wastes, accumulated, piled, left, deposited, buried or discharged upon, or in, or flowing from any property, structure or vehicle, except for refuse or garbage deposited at places designated and provided for that purpose by the City. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 8b. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Nicholas Ouellette through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: September 16, 2021 for the September 23, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Rezoning, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Variance and Preliminary Plat for Garages Too on the Property Located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive (PID 32- 119-23-44-0001 and 32-119-23-44-0009) (city file no. 21-016) REVIEW DEADLINE: November 6, 2021 1.Description of Request The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit, variance and preliminary plat to allow for the development of four new buildings as part of a proposed mini storage/self storage facility. The four buildings will be subdivided into smaller storage spaces for rent. A lot line adjustment will result in the transfer of a portion of the property at 2240 State Highway to the property at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive. The applicant is requesting to rezone 2240 State Highway 55 from Urban Reserve (UR) district to the Light Industrial (I-1) district. A conditional use permit is required as the proposed use, “Mini Storage/Self Storage Facilities”, on proposed Lot 1 is a conditional use in the I-1 district. The applicant is also requesting a variance for: a.Lot size and width standards in the UR district at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive; b.Lot width and front setback standards in the I-1 district at 2240 State Highway 55; c.Required parking and drive aisle setbacks from the south property line of 2240 State Highway 55; and, d.Requirement to develop 2240 State Highway 55 with connection to municipal sewer and water in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item at their August 5, 2021 meeting. In addition to the applicant, there were five residents who spoke on the item. There were also a number of letters and emails that were received and shared with the Planning Commission in advance of the meeting. All letters and emails were entered into the public hearing record. All residents who spoke were opposed to the request. Primary concerns were related to access, noise, drainage, lighting and security. The Planning Commission noted concerns about trash, restrooms, commercial activity on site, traffic and security. The Commission voted 3-2 to recommend denial based on the finding that the variance standards were not met for the variance from municipal services and that the development was premature as defined Garages Too (21-016) 2 September 23, 2021 by Section 925 of the City Code. The other applications must then be denied if the application is deemed premature for development. Staff has prepared as resolution for denial based on the Planning Commission recommendation. Following the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant revised the plans to address some of the engineering comments and provided additional stormwater analysis. The revised plans received on September 7th also show a controlled access gate and turnaround area on the private drive. The gate will permit access to tenants with a unique gate code and restrict access to the site outside the business hours of 7:00AM to 9:00PM as defined by the owner. The applicant has revised the Project Development Narrative and included a standard lease agreement. The project narrative describes provisions from the lease agreement that address some Planning Commission and staff comments. The City Engineer held to neighborhood meetings with the developer on site to review stormwater issues following the Planning Commission meeting. The engineer’s memo includes conditions to address state and local stormwater requirements for water quality and flow rates. 3. Context Background The City Council reviewed a concept plan on March 14, 2021 and indicated support for the project with comments. Council discussed the impact to residential neighbors with respect to noise, screening, and lighting. Council also discussed how the storage facility would operate, fire safety concerns and trip counts for access from State Highway 55. Zoning and Land Use The proposed Lot 1 is guided Light Industrial, zoned UR and is part of the Future Study Area for sanitary sewer identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The property includes an existing home and two detached accessory structures, all of which will be removed as part of the development. The proposed Lot 2 (6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive) is guided Existing Residential in the Comprehensive Plan and has an existing home and detached accessory structure that will remain. Surrounding Properties Properties located to the north and east of the site are guided Existing Residential in the Comprehensive Plan and are zoned UR district. The properties directly west and south of the site are guided Light Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan and are zoned I-1 district. Garages Too (21-016) 3 September 23, 2021 Natural Characteristics of the Site There are no natural resources identified in the Natural Resource Inventory. There are trees scattered around the homesite on both properties. 4. Analysis Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan the City must deny the rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. The City’s discretion in approving a site plan is limited to whether or not the plan meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. The City must approve the site plan if it meets these standards. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed request meets the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. The City’s discretion in approving a preliminary plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Rezoning The two properties that comprise the proposed development site are currently zoned Urban Reserve (UR) district. The applicant is requesting that the property located at 2240 State Highway 55 be rezoned to I-1 district. The property located at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive will remain zoned as UR. The rezoning request shall be evaluated by the following factors from Section 1070.010, Subd. 2, of the Zoning Ordinance: Garages Too (21-016) 4 September 23, 2021 A. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan designates the property at 2240 State Highway 55 as an area for Light Industrial development. The Urban Reserve zoning district is simply a holding zone until development is proposed and the property is then rezoned to the corresponding zoning district. The corresponding zoning district is Light Industrial (I-1). The I-1 district is intended to provide areas for manufacturing, warehousing, automotive, trucking, office and other related uses. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility is consistent with the policies and provisions for the I-1 district as described in the Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Goal #4 is to attract and encourage new light industrial, office-industrial, high tech and professional services, and maintain and expand existing business in Corcoran. The proposed development and use support this Land Use goal. The proposed action is consistent with plans for public facilities and capital improvements. Staff has included a condition that the site will connect to public facilities when they are available. The change to the lot line will mean a portion of the property at 6315 Horseshoe Bend will be guided Light Industrial due to the change in the lot line. This is inconsistent with the UR zoning for this property. Because a portion of this area includes the pond created to serve the industrial lot, staff and the Planning Commission are comfortable with the existing land use remaining until the next Comprehensive Plan update when it should be corrected to follow the lot lines. • However, if the City Council feels differently, they could include a condition a Comprehensive Plan Amendment be applied for prior to final plat submission. B. The proposed action meets the purpose and intent of this Ordinance or, in the case of a map amendment, it meets the purpose and intent of the individual district. The proposed use of the site, self storage facilities, meets the purpose and intent of the Light Industrial district which is to provide a full range of industrial, manufacturing, warehousing and similar uses. The I-1 district allows Mini Storage/Self Storage Facilities as a conditional use permit. C. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. The applicant indicates that this storage facility does not require sewer and water to operate. There is no demand for municipal or private sewer and water, therefore, there is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. D. There is adequate buffer or transition provided between potentially incompatible districts. Adjacent properties to the south and west are zoned I-1 and properties to the north and east are zoned UR. Buffer space is provided on the north and east perimeter of proposed Lot 1. Existing trees along the east property line and proposed tree plantings along the north property line provide Garages Too (21-016) 5 September 23, 2021 screening from the proposed development. The applicant has also proposed eight additional trees to be planted on residential properties to the north of the site. Site Plan The request is for approval of a site plan to allow a “Mini Storage/Self Storage Facilities” use in the I-1 zoning district. The proposed development includes four new buildings to provide a total of 37 individual rental storage units. The existing buildings and utilities on 2240 State Highway 55 will be removed. Design Guidelines/Architecture The proposed development is subject to the performance standards in Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance as well as the Southwest District Design Guidelines in Appendix A of the Zoning Ordinance. Plans for proposed Lot 1 show four buildings ranging in height from 21 ft. 7 in. to 23 ft. 10 in. Buildings will have grey rock face concrete block walls, charcoal concrete brick wainscot, white trim and fascia with asphalt shingled roofs. Building “A” is located at the site entrance and features additional architectural features including grey lap siding, stone veneer wainscot and decorative posts. The building materials comply with ordinance standards for design and architecture. The guidelines for commercial development in the Southwest District are minimal and call for high quality business parks with well-landscaped setbacks and buffers. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility meets the guidelines for commercial development in the Southwest District. The orientation of the buildings and individual storage unit entrances generally face away from the residential properties located to the north and east of the site. There is an existing house and accessory structure on proposed Lot 2 which will remain. No new structures will be developed on proposed Lot 2. Garages Too (21-016) 6 September 23, 2021 Lot Analysis Lot standards for the I-1 district are as follows: I-1 District Standards Proposed Lot 1 Minimum lot area 1 acre 4.59 acres Minimum lot width 100 ft. 0 ft. Minimum lot depth 200 ft. 340 ft. Setbacks Front, from major roadways 100 ft. 0 ft. I-1 District Standards Proposed Lot 1 Setbacks Front, from all other streets 50 ft. 70.15 ft. Side 20 ft. 21.42 ft. Rear 20 ft. 50.06 ft. Adjacent to residential 50 ft. 50 ft. Maximum Principal Building Height 45 ft. 23.66 ft. Maximum impervious surface coverage 70% 65.60% While the structures in proposed Lot 1 comply with the setback requirements, the parking area is within the required 50 ft. setback from the front property line. As such, the applicant is requesting a variance from parking setback requirements in the I-1 district. Lot Standards for the UR district are as follows: UR District Standards Proposed Lot 2 Minimum lot area 20 acres 2.12 acres Minimum lot width 300 ft. 275.24 ft. Minimum lot depth 300 ft. 434.31 ft. Setbacks Front, from all other streets 50 ft. 167.78 ft. Side 25 ft. 42.55 ft. Rear 30 ft. 34.36 ft. UR District Standards Proposed Lot 2 Maximum Principal Building Height 35 ft. N/A Proposed Lot 2 does not meet UR district standards for lot size and width but will increase from 1.67 acres to 2.12 acres. The variance request is discussed later in the staff report. Garages Too (21-016) 7 September 23, 2021 Plans show the existing accessory structure on proposed Lot 2 meets the standard for accessory structure footprints and setbacks from the rear and side property lines. Based on an aerial photo, three additional accessory structures may be located on proposed Lot 2 which are not delineated on site plans or certificate of survey. The applicant has indicated the three accessory structures not delineated on plans are chicken coops. Staff has included a provision all structures shall be delineated on plans submitted with the final plat. Parking Site plans show a graded bituminous paved parking surface with concrete curb and gutter. No designated parking spaces are provided on site. The applicant has indicated that there will be no on-site staff and no allowed over-night parking. Parking areas will be used on a temporary basis by customers accessing their storage units during business hours. To that end, the developer has arranged for a towing service to remove vehicles in violation of the over-night parking rule. The plans show a minimum of 60 feet of separation between buildings, which would be adequate for parking in front of a unit and allow traffic to pass unobstructed. As noted in the Lot Analysis, the drive aisle/parking area on proposed Lot 1 does not comply with the 50 ft. setback from the front (south) property line. The applicant is requesting a variance from parking setback requirements in the I-1 district. Signage No signage is proposed as part of the development and no tenant signage is allowed by the business. Rental units will have identification signs above each service door. Landscaping The Southwest District Design Guidelines recommend landscaping should be designed to work with the existing topography of the area, preserving the rolling hills and natural view corridors. The proposed development preserves the slope on the north of the property and adds landscaping for screening. While the properties to the west and south are vacant industrial properties, the properties to the north and east are single family homes and providing some transition/screening between this use and those homes was identified by the Council as a priority during the concept plan review. Staff notes the highest finished floor elevation of the proposed development is 1045 ft. and homes surrounding the site have elevations between 1018 ft. and 1030 ft. Homes on the residential lots north of proposed Lot 1 are more than 200 ft. from the closest proposed mini storage/self storage facility structure. The homes on 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive and 6311 Horseshoe Bend Drive are, respectively, 142 ft. and 160 ft. from the closest proposed mini storage/self storage facility structure. Garages Too (21-016) 8 September 23, 2021 The applicant’s landscape plan meets ordinance requirements by providing landscaping around the buildings and parking surfaces. City Code requires the minimum number of trees on any given non- residential site to be one overstory tree per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross building floor area or one tree per 50 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. City Code also requires one understory shrub for each 300 sq. ft. of building or one tree per 30 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. Per these standards, the applicant is required to provide 62 trees and 207 shrubs on the site. Landscape plans show 15 existing trees, 47 new trees and 207 shrubs in accordance with this standard. The applicant is also providing eight additional trees on properties adjacent to the north boundary to provide additional screening between residential and light industrial uses. The code does not include a tool to give credit for existing trees or trees planted off site. While staff supports the applicants plan to preserve the existing vegetation on the east lot line and plant trees off-site, an additional 15 trees should be added to the site to meet code requirements. Staff has included this as a condition of approval. • The Planning Commission supported giving credit towards the 62 new trees required for the eight trees to be planted offsite. If City Council agrees, they could modify Resolution xx, condition 6(d) to say “The applicant must preserve the existing 15 trees on the south-east property line, plant the eight trees on the adjacent properties to the north and install 54 new trees and 207 shrubs in compliance with Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance.” Shrub plantings are proposed along the walls of buildings that have visibility from residential properties to the north and east of the site. The applicant’s narrative says that trees are not proposed along the west boundary due to topography and retaining wall issues, but the retaining wall is only one foot high and landscaping could break up the visual of a long wall. Staff note that approximately 30 trees are located on a slope on the north side of proposed Lot 1. Staff has included a condition that the applicant provide a landscape detail to ensure for proper planting of trees on steep slopes. Trees planted on steep slopes like this can struggle to survive if improperly planted. Public Safety Public Safety reviewed the plans and provided an email dated June 23, 2021 stating that the revised plans comply with fire code requirements. The buildings are not sprinkled but do have fire walls and required fire connections through the building. Prior to final plat submittal, initiation of grading, or any other site work, the applicant must provide a turning radius exhibit for the site to ensure that emergency vehicles can safely move through the site. Streets/Access Access to the mini storage/self storage facility on proposed Lot 1 is provided through a private driveway easement which connects to State Highway 55 to the south. Access to the private driveway from State Highway 55 is located within the municipal boundaries of the City of Medina. No access to the mini storage/self storage facility will be provided from Horseshoe Bend Drive. Staff has included a condition Garages Too (21-016) 9 September 23, 2021 that the applicant obtain any required permits and comply with access requirements from the City of Medina or initiate annexation of the property from Medina to Corcoran prior to final plat. MnDOT provided comments to the City with respect to access from State Highway 55. MnDOT recommends providing main access to proposed Lot 1 from Horseshoe Bend Drive rather than the current State Highway 55 access, which is on a horizontal curve on a high speed and high-volume road without turn lanes. However, MnDOT indicated the current access may remain because the proposed development does not meet traffic warrants for required improvements. The applicant is responsible for obtaining an Access Permit from MnDOT. The applicant is also responsible for obtaining approval and financing any requirements from MnDOT including for any work within or affecting the MnDOT right-of- way. The applicant is proposing improvements to the access drive and additional information, as outlined in the Engineer’s Memo dated July 27, 2021, is required to ensure compliance with City and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission rules. The Southwest District Design Guidelines indicate that future driveways and other direct access from new developments to State Highway 55 shall not be permitted. As delineated on the Southwest District map in Figure 1 below, a frontage road is proposed within the district to collect traffic to ensure orderly and safe access to State Highway 55. Staff has included a condition that if the frontage road is built to the proposed development, access to State Highway 55 will be removed and redirected to the frontage road. Figure 1: Southwest District Map from Appendix A of the Zoning Ordinance. The site location is marked by the arrow. Garages Too (21-016) 10 September 23, 2021 Utilities Proposed Lot 1 has existing well and septic and the applicant has indicated the septic system will be removed according to MPCA requirements and the well will be capped per MDH requirements. Development of proposed Lot 1 will not include any new well or septic utilities. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility use will not require an extended employee presence and does not necessitate installation of on-site well and septic facilities. However, the site is located within the MUSA and is required to connect to municipal services prior to any new development. The applicant is requesting a variance from the requirement that municipal services be available at the site prior to development. Staff has included a condition that once municipal services are available to the site, connections must be made. As the lot line is shifting between proposed Lot 1 and Lot 2, vacation of the existing drainage and utility easements along the existing property line will be required with the final plat and shall include the dedication of new drainage and utility easements. These easements are delineated in the site plans. Lighting The only lighting for proposed Lot 1 is building lighting on the structures. The applicant has submitted a light fixture cut sheet that appears to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance including the 90- degree cutoff requirement. While some residences may have sight lines to lit areas of the proposed mini storage/self storage facility, existing and proposed tree plantings shall provide screening to the residences. Stormwater Management The proposed stormwater filtration basin is located on both proposed Lot 1 and proposed Lot 2. As noted in the Engineer’s Memo, a stormwater maintenance agreement is required for all stormwater conveyance and treatment facilities. Stormwater ponds shall be designed to be attractive in both flooded and dry conditions and the use of native plants for filtration around the pond is encouraged. Staff has included a condition that the applicant shall own and maintain the stormwater infrastructure. Wetlands A wetland report has been completed showing two small wetlands. The Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) conducted a site inspection on July 19th and found them to be constructed wetlands which would not be subject to wetland buffer and setback requirements. The applicant submitted a no loss application to the TEP which found the area qualifies for the no loss criteria. The TEP has approved the Wetland Boundary and No Loss applications. Garages Too (21-016) 11 September 23, 2021 Conditional Use Permit The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow “Self Storage Facilities” for the new Garages Too business. Section 1040.125, Subd. 4, of the Zoning Ordinance allows the landowner to request a conditional use permit if they comply with the following standards: 1. Units are to be used for dead storage only. Units are not to be used for retailing, auto repair, human habitation, or any commercial activity, except as allowed by this Section. The applicant has indicated units will be leased to companies and private individuals for storage of items ranging from company vehicles, supplies, automobiles, recreational vehicles, pickup trucks and trailers. The applicant has specified that no commercial-type vehicles will be allowed within the units, however, City Code does not prohibit the storage of commercial-type vehicles. The applicant has also indicated repair of personal vehicles will be allowed within storage units but not in the parking or drive aisles. City Code does not allow for the repair of automobiles in mini storage/self storage facilities and staff has included a condition prohibiting this activity. In the project narrative, the applicant indicates “no public traffic, extended employee presence, outdoor storage or over-night parking will be allowed on site”. Staff interprets the provision that no over-night parking will be allowed on site to mean no outside over-night parking. A gate on the private drive will restrict access to the site outside of the business hours of 7:00AM to 9:00pm. Staff has included a condition that no auto repair will be allowed within units and that no overnight parking is allowed outside of the units. A lease agreement provided by the applicant prohibits tenants from using the property for residential purposes and specifies “no retail or wholesale goods or services may be offered, performed, or sold at the premises or property”. The lease agreement also indicates tenants may not be on the site for more than three hours on any day. There was discussion at the Planning Commission about how to interpret the code language saying, “units are not to be used for… any commercial activity…”. It is staff’s interpretation that the space can be used to store commercial supplies, but that it cannot be used for repairs, production, retail sales, office space or the like. 2. Combining office and /or retail space with a self-service storage facility may be allowed by Conditional Use Permit. The only use proposed for the site is a mini storage/self storage facility. The mini storage/self storage facility will not allow for retail or wholesale goods or services to be offered, performed, or sold on the site. No office or bathroom facilities will be provided on the site for tenants or staff. 3. Storage of hazardous or flammable materials is prohibited. Staff has included a condition that the storage of hazardous or flammable materials is prohibited. The lease agreement provided by the applicant includes a provision that requires tenants to comply with any regulation, rule, order or governmental determination which relates to or governs hazardous materials. Garages Too (21-016) 12 September 23, 2021 4. No exterior storage is allowed. The applicant has indicated no exterior storage or overnight parking of any kind is allowed on the site. To that effect, the applicant has arranged ongoing towing services to remove vehicles in violation of these rules. 5. The facility shall be secured by either the walls of the structure and/or fencing. All doors on the units shall face inward and away from the street and property lines. Plans include a controlled access gate on the private drive on a parcel owned by Garages Too, LLC. The applicant indicates tenants will be given a unique gate code in order to access the site. Access the site will also be restricted outside of the business hours of 7:00AM to 9:00PM. The applicant has also indicated the property will be equipped with surveillance equipment to provide security. Each unit is secured by the walls of the structure. All doors on the units face inwards and away from residential property lines. The site does not abut any public street or private drive. Buildings A and B have units which face the south property line abuts a I-1 zoned property. 6. An on-site manager is allowed only where adequate sanitary facilities are provided, either through use of a septic system or through connection to the public sanitary sewer system. Use of portable sanitary facilities does not fulfill this requirement. As indicated by the applicant, no extended employee presence is planned for the operation of the mini storage/self storage facility. As such, sanitary facilities are not required and not provided. The use must also comply with the standards in Section 1070.020 of the Zoning Ordinance, specifically: A. Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility use is consistent with the uses anticipated for areas guided Light Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use does not impact public facilities and capital improvement plans. B. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community if the conditions of the approval are met. The use is allowed within the I-1 district. C. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values Garages Too (21-016) 13 September 23, 2021 within the neighborhood. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially dimmish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The new business is a conditional use in the I-1 district and the applicant has worked with the adjacent landowner to provide landscaping on the subject property and neighboring properties to provide a transition between uses. Staff has proposed conditions to ensure compliance with the ordinance standards. D. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. E. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Municipal sewer and water are not available to the site, but private utilities would be provided. F. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. G. The conditional use and site conforms to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. Variance for Lot Size and Width Standards in the UR District for Proposed Lot 2 A. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The existing lot at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive is a legal, nonconforming lot, and the combined area with 2240 State Highway 55 lot is not changing. The nonconformity of Lot 2 is decreasing because Lot 2 will increase from 1.67 to 2.12 acres in size. There is practical difficulty in complying with the Zoning Ordinance because the lot is legal nonconforming and it is not possible to create a conforming lot from the combined area of the two lots. Adjusting the common lot line will not result in any real change to the existing conditions with the existing legal nonconforming lot. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. Garages Too (21-016) 14 September 23, 2021 The situation is unique to the site as proposed Lot 2 is nonconforming today and that condition will not change if the preliminary plat and variance are approved. The conditions for which the variance is being sought were established after the property at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive had been developed. The constraints to conform with minimum lot size and lot width were established prior to, and not created by, the current landowners. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The combined area of the proposed lots is not changing and only the shared lot line is being adjusted. The essential character of the locality is being preserved as no new lots are being created and proposed Lot 2 has been developed. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the UR district is to preserve areas where urban services are planned, as shown on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, but not yet available. City Code describes that large minimum lot sizes will assist to retain these lands in their natural state until public infrastructure is available. Proposed Lot 2 has already been developed and will continue to preserve the urban service area as it exists today. E. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance to allow for smaller lot dimensions is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for Existing Low Density Residential. The density of roughly 1 unit per 2 acres will remain the same, as no new development or lots are being created. F. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. None. Variance for Lot Width and Setback Standards in the I-1 District for Proposed Lot 1 A. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The property is unique in that the existing lot of record has no frontage on a public or private street. Lot width is measured at the front lot line, which is the property line abutting an existing or dedicated public street or private drive easement. This lot does not abut a public street and gets access over three separate parcels to the south with a new driveway easement. Without a front lot line, the lot width is zero and does not comply with the lot width requirements in the I-1 district. Because the site is being platted, a variance is required as the site will no longer be legal nonconforming and has practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Garages Too (21-016) 15 September 23, 2021 The required setback from the front lot line cannot be met as there is not front lot line from which to require setbacks. The applicant has proposed a 50 ft. building setback from the south property line which serves as the de facto front property line. A variance from the parking/drive aisle setback is requested. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The situation is unique to the site as the property is nonconforming today and that condition will not change if the preliminary plat and variances are approved. The constraints to conform with lot width and front setback standards were established prior to, and not created by the current landowner. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the I-1 district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. The proposed self-storage facility use is a low impact use and generally compatible with adjacent low density residential uses. Plans for the proposed facility comply with I-1 height, lot coverage, setbacks, landscaping, and loading regulations which facilitate compatibility between light industrial uses and residential development. E. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility consistent with the light industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. F. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. None Variance for Parking and Drive Aisle Setbacks for Proposed Lot 1 A. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The property is unique in that the existing lot of record has no frontage on a public street or private drive. Minimum parking and drive aisle setbacks are 10 ft. from the side and rear and in the front the setbacks are the same minimum front setback for principal structures in the zoning district. Garages Too (21-016) 16 September 23, 2021 Without a front lot line, proposed Lot 1 cannot meet the required setbacks for parking and drive aisles. The front of proposed Lot 1 is determined to be the south lot line where access to the site is provided. The parking and drive aisle could meet a 50 ft. setback from the south property line, however meeting such setbacks would require an exceptionally large amount of landscaping and construction work to overcome topographical challenges of developing the steep slope on the north side of proposed Lot 1. This would also shift the development closer to the adjacent residential properties. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The property has no street frontage and the setback requirements for the front lot line do not abut a street. These conditions are unique to the parcel of land and were not created by the landowner. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use that will not be impacted by the proposed development. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the I-1 district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. The proposed self-storage facility use is a low impact use and generally compatible with adjacent low density residential uses. The applicant is proposing a 10 ft. setback from the south property line which is consistent with parking area and drive aisle setbacks for side and rear property lines. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use which would not require extensive buffers between compatible land uses. E. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility consistent with the light industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. F. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. None. Variance for Municipal Services Requirement A. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Garages Too (21-016) 17 September 23, 2021 New development within the I-1 district shall only be allowed when a full range of municipal services and facilities are available to serve the area. The site is located in the 2030-2035 stage of the Comprehensive Plan 2040 Staging Plan, but the area is subject to a Metropolitan Council study which is not expected to be completed until the next Comprehensive Plan update. This study will determine the method and timing of regional wastewater services for area. It is not practical to delay the development of all property in the southwest district of Corcoran until that study is complete and it is particularly onerous for this site, which does not require municipal sewer and water connection. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The property does not have access to municipal sewer and water services which restricts the ability to develop the site and this condition will not change if the proposed development is approved. This development does not require sewer or water services. The constraints to conform with a connection to municipal sewer and water services were not created by the current landowners. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use property which will also remain unchanged. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the I-1 district, which is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. While this development is proposed without municipal services available to the site, such services are not required to facilitate the proposed use. E. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility that is consistent with the industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. F. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. Staff has included a condition that when municipal sewer and water are available to the site the applicant will be required to connect the facility to those services. Garages Too (21-016) 18 September 23, 2021 Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat will create two new lots from two existing parcels. The plat will adjust the lot line between the self storage site and the adjacent residential property and will increase the residential property by 0.34 acres. As discussed earlier in the staff report, the plat does require variances from lot size and width standards in the UR district. No new lots would be created. Summary Staff has reviewed the plans with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance and finds that the standards for the proposed preliminary plat, rezoning, conditional use permit variance have been met. The proposed use for Lot 1 is consistent with the type of use projected for the Light Industrial zoning district in the City. The proposed use for Lot 2 is consistent with the existing and projected use for the Urban Reserve zoning district in the City. Any outstanding issues that must be addressed have been included as conditions in the attached draft resolutions. Staff recommends approval of the request. It is typical for the City to approve project with conditions of approval that must be addressed and approved by staff prior to beginning construction. However, if the Council feels that additional information is require, they could table the item to a future meeting in October to allow the applicant to provide additional stormwater information required by the City Engineer. The Planning Commission did recommend denial of the request based on the finding that development is premature until municipal sanitary sewer and water are available to serve the parcel. Staff has prepared a resolution for denial based on their recommendation. 5. Recommendation The City Council should choose one of the following three options: a. Move to approve the request by adopting the following: i. Ordinance 2021-461 amending the Zoning Map ii. Resolution 2021-94 approving findings of fact for rezoning iii. Resolutions 2021-95 approving site plan and conditional use permit iv. Resolution 2021-96 approving the variance v. Resolution 2021-97 approving the preliminary plat. b. Move to adopt Resolution 2021-94 denying the request, as recommended by the Planning Commission. c. Table the request to the October 14th or 28th meeting to allow the applicant time to provide more stormwater information. Garages Too (21-016) 19 September 23, 2021 Attachments 1. Resolution 2021-94 denying the request 2. Ordinance 2021-431 amending the Zoning Map 3. Resolution 2021-94 approving findings of fact for rezoning 4. Resolution 2021-95 approving site plan and conditional use permit 5. Resolution 2021-96 approving the variance 6. Resolution 2021-97 approving the preliminary plat. 7. Site Location Map dated July 29, 2021 8. City Engineer’s Memo dated September 16, 2021 9. Response to Engineering Review Comments dated September 7, 2021 10. Public Safety Memo dated May 5, 2021 11. Public Safety Email dated June 23, 2021 12. MnDOT Letter dated May 25, 2021 13. Applicant Site Plan Narrative dated September 7, 2021 14. Development Plans dated September 7, 2021 15. Drainage Analysis dated September 7, 2021 16. Storm Sewer Pipe Size Analysis dated September 7, 2021 17. Wetland Delineation dated July 8, 2021 18. Wetland Notice of Decision dated August 11, 2021 19. Certificate of Survey for 2240 State Highway 55 dated March 11, 2021 20. Certificate of Survey for 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive dated May 26, 2021 21. Architectural Plans dated April 20, 2021 22. Color Sheets dated July 2, 2021 23. Cut Sheets for Lighting dated May 24, 2021 24. Public Comments City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: DENYING A REZONING, SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCES AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GARAGES TOO ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 AND 6315 HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE (PID 32-119-23-44-0001 AND 32-119-23-44-0009) (CITY FILE 21-016) WHEREAS, Craig Scherber of Garages Too, LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit, variances and preliminary plat for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive, legal described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit, variances and preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends denial; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request for a variance for the municipal services requirement based on the finding that the variance standards in Section 1070.040 of the Zoning Ordinance have not been met. Specifically: 1. Adequate municipal services and facilities are not available to accommodate the rezoning and proposed use. As such, the request is not reasonable because there is no practical difficulty or hardship in complying with the Zoning Ordinance standard that new development within the Light Industrial (I-1) district shall only be allowed when a full range of municipal services and facilities are available to serve the area. 2. Section 925.010 of the City Code prohibits approval of any subdivision deemed premature. The site is premature for development due to lack municipal sanitary sewer and water service. FUTHER, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request for a rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit, variance for lot size and width standards in the Urban Reserve (UR) district for proposed Lot 2, variance for lot width and setback standards in the Light Industrial (I-1) district for proposed Lot 1, variance for parking and drive aisle setbacks for proposed Lot 1 and preliminary plat based on the finding that it cannot proceed without the variance from the municipal services requirement. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 2 of 3 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 3 of 3 Attachment A That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and Lot 4, Block 2, Schnell’s Highland Acres 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-431 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 (PID 32-119-23-44- 0001) (CITY FILE 21-016) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Corcoran Zoning Map from Urban Reserve (UR) to Light Industrial (I-1), described as follows: See Attachment A Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon adoption of this resolution. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 23rd day of September 2021. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-431 ATTACHMENT A That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING FOR 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 (PID 32-119-23-44-0001) (CITY FILE NO 21-016) WHEREAS, Craig Scherber of Garages Too, LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval to rezone the property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the request of Garages Too, LLC for the reclassification of the property, based on the following findings and conditions: 1. The Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan designates the property at 2240 State Highway 55 as an area for Light Industrial development. The Urban Reserve zoning district is simply a holding zone until development is proposed and the property is then rezoned to the corresponding zoning district. The corresponding zoning district is Light Industrial (I-1). The I-1 district is intended to provide areas for manufacturing, warehousing, automotive, trucking, office and other related uses. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility is consistent with the policies and provisions for the I-1 district as described in the Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Goal #4 is to attract and encourage new light industrial, office-industrial, high tech and professional services, and maintain and expand existing business in Corcoran. The proposed development and use support this Land Use goal. 2. The proposed action meets the purpose and intent of the individual district. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility use of the site meets the purpose and intent of the I-1 district which is to provide a full range of industrial, manufacturing, warehousing and similar uses. 3. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility does not require sewer and water to operate and no sewer and water infrastructure is proposed as part of the development. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. 4. There is adequate buffer or transition provided between potentially incompatible districts. Adjacent properties to the south and west are zoned I-1 and properties to the north and east are zoned UR. Buffer space is provided on the north and east perimeter of proposed Lot 1. Existing trees along the east property line and proposed tree plantings along the north property line provide screening from the proposed development. The applicant has also proposed eight additional trees to be planted on residential properties to the north of the site. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 2 of 3 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-95 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 AND 6315 HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE (PID 32- 119-23-44-0001 and 32-119-23-44-0009) (CITY FILE 21-016) WHEREAS, Craig Scherber of Garages Too, LLC (“the applicant”) is requesting approval of a site plan and conditional use permit for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive, legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan and conditional use permit at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A site plan and conditional use permit are approved to allow for the construction of four buildings for a mini storage/self storage facility as shown on application and plans received by the City on June 18, 2021 and additional information received on July 9, 2021, August 11, 2021, and September 7, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The applicant must comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated September 16, 2021. 3. The applicant has received approval of a Wetland Delineation and No Loss application on August 11, 2021. 4. The applicant must comply with MnDOT comments dated May 25, 2021. 5. The applicant must comply with the Public Safety Plan Review comments dated May 5, 2021 and June 23, 2021. 6. The development shall comply with all I-1 district standards. 7. Prior to submittal of final plat, the applicant must comply with the following conditions: a. Prior to final plat submittal, initiation of grading, or any other site work, the applicant must provide a turning radius exhibit to ensure that emergency vehicles can safely move through the site. b. Plans shall be revised to show all accessory structures including the three accessory structures on 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-95 Page 2 of 5 c. The applicant must coordinate with adjacent landowners for the installation of the eight additional trees. d. The applicant must preserve the existing 15 trees on the south-east property line, plant the eight trees on the adjacent properties to the north and install 62 new trees and 207 shrubs in compliance with Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance. e. The applicant must provide a landscape detail to ensure for the proper planting of trees on steep slopes. f. The applicant is required to obtain any required permits and comply with access requirements from the City of Medina or initiate annexation of the property from Medina to Corcoran prior to final plat. g. The applicant is responsible for obtaining an Access Permit from MnDOT. h. The applicant is responsible for obtaining approval and financing any requirements from MnDOT including for any work within or affecting the MnDOT right-of-way. i. No access to the mini-storage/self storage facility will be allowed from Horseshoe Bend Drive. j. The applicant shall own and maintain the stormwater infrastructure. k. When the frontage road is constructed to the proposed development, access to State Highway 55 will be removed and redirected to the frontage road. l. When municipal sewer and water are available to the proposed development, the developer is responsible to pay TLAC (Trunk Line Availability Charges) fees. Connection charges will be due when the connection to municipal sanitary sewer and water is made. 8. A conditional use permit for mini storage/self storage is approved, subject to the finding that the applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Zoning Ordinance have been met. Specifically: a. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility use is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated on this site by the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use does not impact public facilities and capital improvement plans. b. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community. The use is also allowed within the I-1 district. c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-95 Page 3 of 5 new business is a conditional use in the I-1 district and conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with ordinance standards. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. e. The site is located within the MUSA but municipal sewer and water are not available to the site. Private utilities would be provided until a connection to municipal sewer and water can be made. f. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. g. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. h. The use shall be subject to the following conditions: i. Units are to be used for dead storage only. Units are not to be used for retailing, auto repair, human habitation, or any commercial activity, except as allowed in section. i. No office and /or retail space is allowed. ii. Storage of hazardous or flammable materials is prohibited. iii. No exterior storage is allowed. iv. The facility shall be secured by either the walls of the structure and/or fencing. All doors on the units shall face inward and away from the street and property lines. v. An on-site manager is allowed only where adequate sanitary facilities are provided, either through use of a septic system or through connection to the public sanitary sewer system. Use of portable sanitary facilities does not fulfill this requirement. No on-site manager is proposed or approved for this project. vi. No auto repair will be allowed on the site or within units. vii. No overnight parking is allowed outside of the units. viii. The applicant must provide a copy of the lease agreement prohibiting such activities for City review and approval. 9. A building permit is required prior to beginning construction. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-95 Page 4 of 5 10. The applicant must submit and receive approval of a wetland No Loss application prior to final plat submittal. 11. The applicant is responsible for maintenance of the stormwater pond and must enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement with the City. 12. The applicant shall execute the Site Improvement Performance Agreement and provide a financial guarantee in compliance with Section 1070 of the Zoning Ordinance. 13. FURTHER, the applicant shall record the approving resolution and required easements at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-95 Page 5 of 5 Attachment A That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and Lot 4, Block 2, Schnell’s Highland Acres 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 1 of 6 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 AND 6315 HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE (PID 32-119-23-44-0001 and 32-119-23-44-0009) (CITY FILE 21-016) WHEREAS, Craig Scherber of Garages Too, LLC (“the applicant”) is requesting approval of variances for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive, legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance from lot size and lot width requirements in the Urban Reserve (UR) district for the property located at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive; and WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance from lot width and front setback requirements in the Light Industrial (I-1) district for the property located at 2400 State Highway 55; and WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance from parking and drive aisle setback requirements in the I-1 district for the property located at 2400 State Highway 55; and WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance from Municipal Services Requirement for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the variances at a public meeting and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for variance, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. Approval is based on plans received by the City on June 18, 2021 and additional information received on July 9, 2021, August 11, 2021, and September 7, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The requested variance from the lot size and lot width requirements in the UR district for the property located at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The existing lot at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive is a legal, nonconforming lot, and the combined area with 2400 State Highway 55 is not changing. The nonconformity of Lot 2 is decreasing because Lot 2 will increase from 1.67 to 2.12 acres in size. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 2 of 6 There is practical difficulty in complying with the Zoning Ordinance because the lot is legal nonconforming and it is not possible to create a conforming lot from the combined area of the two lots. Adjusting the common lot line will not result in any real change to the existing conditions with the existing legal nonconforming lot. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcels of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowners. The conditions for which the variance is being sought were established after the property at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive had been developed. The constraints to conform with minimum lot size and lot width were established prior to, and not created by, the current landowners. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The essential character of the locality is not changing as no new lots are being created and Lot 2 has been developed. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the UR district is to preserve areas where urban services are planned, as shown on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, but not yet available. City Code describes that large minimum lot sizes will assist to retain these lands in their natural state until public infrastructure is available. 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive has already been developed and will continue to preserve the urban service area as it exists today. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance to allow for smaller lot dimensions is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for Existing Low Density Residential. The density of roughly 1 unit per 2 acres will remain the same, as no new development or lots are being created. 3. The requested variance from lot width and front setback requirements in the I-1 district for the property located at 2400 State Highway 55 is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The property is unique in that the existing lot of record has no frontage on a public or private street. Without a front lot line, the lot width is zero and does not comply with the lot width requirements in the I-1 district. Because the site is being platted, a variance is required as the site will no longer be legal nonconforming and has practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcels of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowners. The situation is unique to the site as the property is nonconforming today and that condition will not change if the preliminary plat and variances are approved. The constraints to conform with lot width and front setback standards were established prior to, and not created by the current landowner. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 3 of 6 d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the I-1 district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. The proposed self-storage facility use is a low impact use and generally compatible with adjacent low density residential uses. Plans for the proposed facility comply with I-1 height, lot coverage, setbacks, landscaping, and loading regulations which facilitate compatibility between light industrial uses and residential development. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility consistent with the light industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The requested variance from parking and drive aisle setback requirements in the I-1 district for the property located at 2400 State Highway 55 is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The property is unique in that the existing lot of record has no frontage on a public street or private drive. Without a front lot line, proposed Lot 1 cannot meet the required setbacks for parking and drive aisles. The front of proposed Lot 1 is determined to be the south lot line where access to the site is provided. The parking and drive aisle could meet a 50 ft. setback from the south property line, however meeting such setbacks would require an exceptionally large amount of landscaping and construction work to overcome topographical challenges of developing the steep slope on the north side of proposed Lot 1. This would also shift the development closer to the adjacent residential properties. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcels of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowners. The property has no street frontage and the setback requirements for the front lot line do not abut a street. These conditions are unique to the parcel of land and were not created by the landowner. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use that will not be impacted by the proposed development. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the I-1 district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. The proposed self-storage facility use is a low impact use and generally compatible with adjacent low density residential uses. The applicant is proposing a 10 ft. setback from the south property line which is consistent with parking area and drive aisle setbacks for side and rear property lines. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use which would not require extensive buffers between compatible land uses. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility consistent with the light industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 4 of 6 5. The requested variance from Municipal Services Requirement for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. New development within the I-1 district shall only be allowed when a full range of municipal services and facilities are available to serve the area. The site is located in the 2030-2035 stage of the Comprehensive Plan 2040 Staging Plan, but the area is subject to a Metropolitan Council study which is not expected to be completed until the next Comprehensive Plan update. It is not practical to delay the development of a site that will not require municipal sewer and water connection. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcels of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowners. The property does not have access to municipal sewer and water services which restricts the ability to develop the site and this condition will not change if the proposed development is approved. The constraints to conform with a connection to municipal sewer and water services were not created by the current landowners. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use property which will also remain unchanged. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the I-1 district, which is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. While this development is proposed without municipal services available to the site, such services are not required to facilitate the proposed use. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility that is consistent with the industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. f. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. when municipal sewer and water are available to the site the applicant will be required to connect the facility to those services. 6. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 5 of 6 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 6 of 6 Attachment A That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and Lot 4, Block 2, Schnell’s Highland Acres 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 AND 6315 HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE (PID 32-119-23-44-0001 AND 32-119- 23-44-0009) (CITY FILE 21-016) WHEREAS, Craig Scherber of Garages Too, LLC (“the applicant”) is requesting approval of a preliminary plat for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive, legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a preliminary plat, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved, in accordance with the plans received by the City on June 18, 2021 and additional information received on July 9, 2021, August 11, and September 7, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval of the preliminary plat is contingent upon the approval of the rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit and variance. 3. The applicant must comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated September 16, 2021. 4. The applicant has received approval of a Wetland Delineation and No Loss application on August 11, 2021. 5. Approval of the preliminary plat shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of final plat. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Vehrenkamp, Dean Vehrenkamp, Dean City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 Page 2 of 3 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 23rd day of September 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran September 23, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 Page 3 of 3 Attachment A That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and Lot 4, Block 2, Schnell’s Highland Acres 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Memo To:Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From:Kent Torve, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project:Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Date:September 16, 2021 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents: 1. Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC, 22400 State Highway 55 Dated 09/07/2021 2. Garages Too Site Improvement Project Civil Site Plans, Prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design, Dated 09/07/20/2021 3. Garages Too Pipe Size Analysis, Dated 09/07/2021 4. Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project – Drainage Analysis, Prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design, Dated 09/07/2021 5. Response to Engineering Review Comments – Garages Too, Prepared by Civil Enginering Site Design, Dated 09/07/2021. Comments: Drainage Development that creates additional impervious area is reviewed by the City and WMO for water quality and flow rates. A secondary outcome is the additional impervious areas and BMP’s to meet those primary standards extends the duration of stormwater flows and therefore the City reviews both the onsite property and downstream drainage conveyance for potential impacts. For Garages Too the downstream conveyance has had historical issues and public testimony was followed up with two neighborhood meetings (with developer) held onsite. The following comments are specific to the plat and consistent with improvements made by other developments in the City. Conveyance This development’s plat includes the single family home and analysis shall be extended to plat boundaries for the development and downstream conveyance systems for extreme events and additional volume. Modeling of the drainage to the single family driveway culvert at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive shall be conducted as follows. Existing Existing flows and HWLs for the 2, 10 and 100-year events. Existing flow from the west along Horseshoe Bend should be included in this analysis. Proposed – Driveway Improvements A design shall be submitted to maintain the 10-year events within the south ditch of Horsehoe Bend Drive Driveway reshaping design shall be proposed for two conditions (culvert size to remain the same) A) Maintain current flow paths with road overtopping, and B) Redesign driveway to prevent overtopping of Horseshoe Bend Drive. September 16, 2021 Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 7 Downstream Conveyance The downstream conveyance shall be surveyed and reviewed for nuisance flow paths, obstructions, and extreme events as follows: Survey all swale cross sections and culverts to the downstream discharge to the wetland complex to the east of Rolling Hills Road. o This shall include but not be limited to downstream culvert inverts, diameters, swale cross sections, and road and driveway overtopping elevations beginning at the pond outlet and include private driveways on both north and south sides of Horseshoe Bend Drive and terminating at the culvert discharge(s) east side of Rolling Hills Road. Based on this information, the developer shall analyze the 2 year (for nuisance flows) and the 10 and 100- year events through this system. Ditch improvements, or culvert adjustments may be necessary to manage the additional volume created by the development. Improvements may be required of the developer and further coordination with the City is required based on results of these analysis. General: 1. Comments provided are based on the level of detail of the documents provided. Additional comments should be anticipated on future submittals as the level of detail increases. 2. Consistent with the review process, a comment response letter shall be provided in response to the following comments provided in this Memorandum in which the owner/applicant or representative provides a written response to each item. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the proposed plans are subject to additional planning, zoning, public safety, and all other applicable codes and standards of the City of Corcoran. 3. Site disturbance is identified as over and acre which will require the site to comply with MPCA and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission requirements in addition to City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines. Final approval by the MPCA and Elm Creek WMO must be attained before any site grading or activity may commence. Provide Elm Creek Watershed and MPCA approval within the SWMP when received. 4. Final permitting and documentation of septic system abandonment needs to be provided to the city. 5. Final permitting and documentation of well abandonment needs to be provided to the city. Plat: 1. The applicant shall show all drainage and utility easements and all platting requirements met per the City Code. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided as standard per City requirements. 2. Easements should be provided over all infrastructure used for the conveyance and treatment of stormwater. 3. The easement over the stormwater basin should be large enough to encompass the HWL of the pond and any additional access around its perimeter. 4. Show pond access route on plans and ensure it is covered by D&U easement. September 16, 2021 Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 7 Erosion Control/SWPPP 1. Preparation of an erosion control plan and compliance with a Construction SWPPP shall be required for construction. a. A copy of the MPCA Construction Stormwater Permit shall be provided to the City prior to any disturbance activities. 2. The City of Corcoran is an MS4 community and site visits will be conducted weekly or after rain events 3. Silt fence is placed perpendicular to contours in some locations. Silt fence should only be placed parallel to contours. J hooking is also an acceptable method. To avoid showing all locations of j- hooking on plans, please add note to J-hook silt fence where scour along silt fence is observed during weekly inspections. Transportation 1. The need for fire access around the building shall be determined by Public Safety. 2. A future frontage road is planned for this area connecting Pioneer Trail and Rolling Hills Road. The Site appears north of the future road corridor, but ultimate access will be provided via this future frontage road. 3.The grading off of the drive is listed is steeper than the 4:1 slopes allowed. All slopes shall be 4:1 of flatter without prior engineering approval. 4.Provide additional details on cleared turn around area. If intended for emergency service turnaround it must meet city standards. Provide grading plan and details on turn around materials. 5.Turn around area and gate swing appears to be outside of easement limits. Applicant shall ensure they have rights to this area. 6.Provide additional details on how controlled access will be accessed by public and emergency services staff. Grading /Stormwater 1. The City’s Stormwater Modeling Guidelines shall be used for stormwater systems and modeling (https://corcoranmn.gov/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=15567509). 2. The property owner shall own and maintain the stormwater infrastructure. A stormwater maintenance agreement will be required for all stormwater conveyance and treatment facilities. 3. Full offsite drainage area to the pond is not accounted for. It appears almost half an acre is not accounted for from the west. Update drainage area hydrology and modeling. September 16, 2021 Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Kevin Mattson Page 4 of 7 September 16, 2021 Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Kevin Mattson Page 5 of 7 4. Drainage boundary delineation should be modified for Basin 1P. Additionally, proposed contour 1036 matches into existing contour 1035. 5. Existing soils -- NRCS data shows a large area of HSG C soils on site (model uses exclusively HSG D), therefore should be modified reflect existing conditions. D soils shall be used for proposed conditions for all disturbed greenspace areas. As currently modeled, existing runoff rates are overestimated (therefore pond storage underestimated) by assuming existing D soils. Use CN of 74 for HSG C pervious areas for existing conditions. September 16, 2021 Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Kevin Mattson Page 6 of 7 6. Retaining walls to be located outside of D&U Easement, or an encroachment agreement to be provided. Designer indicated an encroachment agreement will be coordinated. Please provide with next submittal. 7. Time of concentration (Tc) flow paths are still not shown to verify HydroCAD inputs. Additionally, subcatchment 1S’s calculated-Tc was increased to the “minimum Tc” of 15 mins. 7 mins is considered the minimum Tc for Minnesota. Provide flow paths and do not increase Tcs above 7 minutes unless shown. 8. The EOF should be 1 foot above the HWL per City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines for Development Review. Currently the EOF is less than a 1/4 inch above the HWL. 9. Pond in proposed Hydrocad should have a defined starting elevation at the controlling outlet structure elevation (NWL of 1033). 10. A typical CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly. a. Three inches (0.25 feet) of head on a CB will inundate a street centerline (2% slope). b. Typical spacing is 200 to 250 feet along a curb that includes about 40 feet from road centerline (drainage area of 10,000 SF per CB). Response: Inlet capacity calculations for a sag catch basin with R-3067 grate allow 6.25 cfs before overtopping 6” curb. Both sag inlets will not overtop 6” curb. Stantec Follow-up: Following City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines is required. The City’s calculations are based on preventing road flooding, not measured to curb overtopping. This comment remains. 11. OCS-1 does not meet City of Corcoran Standard Plate STO-17. Please follow OCS detail available within City of Corcoran Standard Details. For example: a. The soffit of the inlet pipe (1033.25) is above the baffle wall (1033.0). Therefore, floating debris would be able to pass through. STO-17 detail indicates that soffit of inlet pipe to top of baffle wall or baffle wall orifice (not currently utilized) should be at least 1 feet. b. Structure Base Extend slab minimum of 6” from the outside wall of manhole Minimum 6” aggregate backfill under slab Minimum 8” slab thickness c. Manhole Diameter – 5’ in STO-17 but 4’ for OCS-1 detail. d. Elevation drop across the non-planar slanted riser is 1’ for STO-17, but 0.75’ for OCS-1 detail. e. While it is understood that the OCS-1 detail is not to a set scale, a somewhat proportional detail is still required to minimize confusion during plan review and construction. For example, the issue noted in “a.” above was not clear from the detail because the disproportionately illustrated dimensions, elevations, etc. 12. OCS-1 Plans do match HydroCAD. a. Outlet pipe from structure has invert of 1025.25 per plan detail, but 1026.25 per modeling. Correct discrepancy. b. An extra 48” Horiz. Orifice is modeled in HydroCAD. Custom Weir/Orifice already accounts for the standpipe overflow. Please remove. 13. Please follow filtration basin detail available within City of Corcoran Standard Details (STO-20). Current filtration basin is not designed correctly. For example: a.Plan detail does not show stone on sides and top of underdrain. 14. Provide documentation that drawdown of filtration basin 48 hours or less. September 16, 2021 Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Kevin Mattson Page 7 of 7 15. Grading and silt fence is essentially on the easement boundary. Ensure easement is sufficient for construction or provide agreement with adjacent property to allow rights for temporary improvements. 16. Ensure stormwater rate control is still met after updates to modeling. 17. Discharge to stormwater pond shall be extended to the bottom of the hill and structure should be relocated or added prior to the discharge point to lower velocities to ensure erosion at discharge won’t be a concern. Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. The applicant indicates that no sewer and water facilities are necessary or provided for the site. 2. If not used with the current development, any wells which service the existing property should be abandoned by a licensed contractor. 3. The existing septic system should be abandoned by a licensed contractor. Plan Recommendations 1. To expedite review the designer may desire to use: a. Standard Scales - Scale of drawings showing drainage areas (DA1 and DA2) is atypical measured at 0.456” = 60’. End of Comments Civil Engineering Site Design 118 East Broadway St., PO Box 566, Monticello MN 55362 Phone: 763-314-0929 www.civilesd.com September 7, 2021 City of Corcoran c/o Stantec Inc. Attn: Mr. Kent Torve, City Engineer Mr. Steven Hegland, PE 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359 Re: Response to Engineering Review Comments Garages Too Improvement Project Corcoran, MN This letter is written with item by item responses to comments dated 7/27/21. Responses are in italic text. Plans and drainage analysis with revision date 09/07/21 address the majority of the comments; unresolved or items in process are noted accordingly. General city code comments are skipped over without responses. Engineering Review Comments: (review of submitted plans dated July 8, 2021) General 3. Narrative currently references requirements from “the City of St. Michael”. Designer should update the “Requirements” and “Summary” section to correctly reference City of Corcoran requirements. Response: The drainage analysis narrative has been edited accordingly. Plat 2. Easements should be provided over all infrastructure used for the conveyance and treatment of stormwater. Response: Revised easements. Erosion Control/SWPPP 1. Preparation of an erosion control plan and compliance with a Construction SWPPP shall be required for construction. Response to Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 8 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN September 7, 2021 Response: Acknowledged. 2. The City of Corcoran is an MS4 community and site visits will be conducted weekly or after rain events. Response: Acknowledged. 3. Outlet pipe from filtration basin is a concentrated discharge directly into a silt fence. Silt fence is for intercepting sheet flow not a concentrated discharge. Provide alternative perimeter protection from this concentrated discharge. Response: Added 6” sediment control rock logs on Sheet C5.2 and added wood fiber log callout to clarify erosion control material type. 4. Silt fence is placed perpendicular to contours in some locations. Silt fence should only be placed parallel to contours. Consider silt fence relief with rock bags, hale bales, erosion log or similar perimeter control for concentrated discharges. J hooking is also an acceptable method. Response: Added 10” sediment control fiber logs. 5. Provide erosion control at skimmer inlet consistent with City of Corcoran Standard Plate STO-16. Response: Added city detail STO-17 and inlet stabilization callout on Sheet C7.2. 6. Vegetation for Stormwater Management Facility is not provided. Need to provide vegetation tolerant of typical wetland conditions. From MPCA stormwater manual, “Bioinfiltration basins must meet the required 48-hour drawdown time and must be sized to allow for adequate maintenance. Response: Seed mixtures and fertilizer called out on Vegetation Ground Cover Schedule on SWPPP, Sheet C5.1. Seed mixtures also called out on Landscape plan, Sheet C8. Filtration Basin Volume Worksheet calculates the 48 hour filtration capacity as greater than the basin volume. 7. Planting notes allows “substitution by Owner”, however the note should be removed or modified to “any substitution must be approved by City”. Response: Planting notes revised on Sheet C.8. 8. Silt fence installed outside of easements on access road. Silt fence shall be placed within property or developer shall provide agreement with adjacent property to allow Response to Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 8 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN September 7, 2021 rights for temporary improvements. Response: Silt fence installation outside of existing access road easement is on property owned by the developer (same owner). No agreement needed. Transportation 1. The need for fire access around the building shall be determined by Public Safety. Response: Public Safety has determined fire access is acceptable. 2. A future frontage road is planned for this area connecting Pioneer Trail and Rolling Hills Road. The Site appears north of the future road corridor, but ultimate access will be provided via this future frontage road. Response: Acknowledged. 3. Concrete sections are concrete on sand. We typically would expect a class 5 or other aggregate base. Confirm this is correct. Response: Sand section below concrete is sufficient. 4. Bituminous section calls out sand, draintile detail provided in plans, no draintile shown in bit section, change to not have sand or included draintile for drainage. Response: Added draintile. 5. Parking to be verified with City Planning. No designated parking shown. Response: No parking required. 6. Grading limits are shown for private drive but no additional information on elevations or grades. Details shall be provided for the proposed drive including the improvements and grading to ensure it fits within the existing easement. This shall include all necessary stormwater improvements to ensure driveway improvements don’t impact adjacent properties. Response: Added driveway grades. Driveway will continue to sheet drain as is the case with the existing driveway. Grading/Stormwater 1. The City’s Stormwater Modeling Guidelines shall be used for stormwater systems and modeling (https://corcoranmn.gov/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=15567509). Response: Acknowledged. Response to Engineering Review Comments Page 4 of 8 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN September 7, 2021 2. The property owner shall own and maintain the stormwater infrastructure. A stormwater maintenance agreement will be required for all stormwater conveyance and treatment facilities. Response: Acknowledged. 3. Stormwater rate control and water quality treatment is not currently shown for private driveway. All disturbed areas must be analyzed for compliance with stormwater standards. Any increase in imperviousness due to the private drive shall be included in modeling. Response: Added driveway impervious surface to HydroCAD model and filtration basin volume worksheet. 4. Retaining walls to be located outside of D&U Easement, or an encroachment agreement to be provided. Response: Development team to coordinate with city for encroachment agreement. 5. Update OCS Detail 1 to be proportionally drawn. Response: Added “not to scale” to detail. 6. Subwatershed delineation should encompass the entire contributing drainage areas, including undisturbed or off-site areas that drain on, not just the parcel boundary. Response: Revised drainage areas. 7. Time of concentration (Tc) flow paths not shown. Additionally, an aerial is needed to verify surface type and is required per Stormwater Guidelines. Also, the Tc’s calculated were increased to the “minimum Tc” of 15mins. Where does this assumed minimum come from? Typically, 7 mins is considered the minimum Tc for Minnesota. Response: Revised Tc to minimum of 7 minutes. Added Aerial to Existing Condition Drainage Plan. 8. Proposed sub catchment 12S uses Tcs calculated with values attributed to cropland flow. Adjust or edit the value to the Tc minimum for proposed conditions. Response: Revised Tc. 9. Designer should check scale of drawings showing drainage areas. Based on the scale of the DA1 and DA2 the parcel is only ~4.7 acres not 5.04 acres. Site Data provided for existing impervious/pervious breakdown on Sheet C1 does not match existing HydroCAD modeling. Response: Revised drainage areas. Response to Engineering Review Comments Page 5 of 8 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN September 7, 2021 10. Plans need a pre-treatment basin detail. Response: Added detail to Sheet C7.2. 11. It would be more appropriate to model the basin as a two-basin system rather than a single system. As currently modeled, the two basins function as one basin, but they will function in series except at water elevations exceeding 1032.0 after the outlet basins equalize. Ensure filtration is only accounted for within the 2nd basin. Response: In HydroCAD, it is a single system as even the 2-year rainfall event peak water elevation is 1.5 feet above the 1032 pre-treatment basin outlet elevation. Removed HydroCAD device #4 (Exfiltration) since it minimally affects runoff rates. 12. Unit hydrograph has peak factor of 400 rather than the default SCS 484 which lower’s peak runoff rates. The 400 peaking factor refers to MSE 3 MN rather than MSE 3. MSE 3 MN is only applicable to rural hydrology per MnDOT and NEH Part 650 – Minnesota Supplement. Response: Revised unit hydrograph. 13. In the absence of in-situ tests an infiltration rate of 0.06 in/hr should be used for soil type D instead of 0.8 in/hr A soils according to MPCA guidelines. Test pits or in-situ are required for any project proposing natural infiltration practices. This type of practices is difficult (or not feasible) in the heavy soils in Corcoran. Response: Removed HydroCAD device #4 (Exfiltration) since it minimally affects runoff rates. 14. Exfiltration flows should be routed in series to a 6” diameter drain tile, not directly to the outlet culvert. Model the drain tile to account for its capacity. Response: Removed HydroCAD device #4 (Exfiltration) since it minimally affects runoff rates. 15. Modeling of the overflow to the riser structure (Device #5) overestimates capacity at elevations between 1034.5 and 1035.25 since the orifice is not horizontal. A custom weir/orifice should be used for non-orthogonal orifices. Ensure to use a sharp crested weir coefficient (~3.1) City will provide spreadsheet to determine custom weir HydroCAD inputs based on City standard OCS detail. Response: Outlet control structure (device #5, now #4) revised to custom weir/orifice. 16. Update EOF details in model to match plans provided. Dimensions do not seem to match plans. Response: Modified EOF data in HydroCAD to match detail STO-12. Response to Engineering Review Comments Page 6 of 8 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN September 7, 2021 17. The EOF should be 1 foot above the HWL. Currently the EOF is less than 6 inches above the HWL. Response: The basin is designed to accommodate a 100-year rainfall event with the emergency overflow passing overflow from any larger storm event. 18. Sheet C7.2 – No socks on underdrains should be used. See City of Corcoran standard detail plate STO-20. Response: Revised Filtration Basin detail. 19. Upsize all draintile to 6” to reduce chance of clogging. Response: Revised to 6” draintile. 20. Northern draintile is at 0.8% per sheet C3, but C7.2 only indicates a single slope of 0.5% on the detail. Detail or plan sheet should be updated. Response: Updated detail to indicate draintile slope at 0.50% minimum. 21. Much of the runoff directly to the filtration basin is not pre-treated unless you consider filter strip or swales. Ensure pretreatment is provided for impervious areas prior to filtration/infiltration. Response: Roof (disconnected impervious) and greenspace runoff are conveyed by the vegetated swale which serves as pre-treatment for the filtration basin. 22. Per the Minnesota Stormwmater Manual, the required effective filtration area is determined by the bottom area of the filtration basin not including side slopes. Remove side slopes from infiltration/filtration modeling. Response: Removed HydroCAD device #4 (Exfiltration) since it minimally affects runoff rates. 23. NRCS soils report shows a large area of HSG C soils on site. (model uses HSG D), update to appropriate CN. Response: While some soil areas are designated as hydrologic group B or C from the NRCS soil engineering properties, the soil properties are consistently indicating clay loam soils with soil classifications (e.g. CL, SC, CH) that are designated hydrologic group D in the MN Stormwater manual. 24. Pond in proposed Hydrocad should have a defined starting elevation at the controlling outlet structure elevation (NWL). Response: Revised to disallow filtration drawdown volume. HydroCAD model Response to Engineering Review Comments Page 7 of 8 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN September 7, 2021 updated with starting elevation at 1032.00. 25. Provide storm sewer sizing calculations using the rational method for the 10 year event. Response: Calculations are attached as part of this submittal. 26. A typical CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly. Response: Inlet capacity calculations for a sag catch basin with R-3067 grate allow 6.25 cfs before overtopping 6” curb. Both sag inlets will not overtop 6” curb. 27. Grading contours not shown on proposed access driveway. Grading limits should be expanded as necessary to account for tie in to existing. Response: Driveway grades added and grading limits adjusted. 28. 3’ sump required in MH-10 for drop greater than 2’. Response: Revised sump to be 3 feet. Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. The applicant indicates that no sewer and water facilities are necessary or provided for the site. Response: Confirmed. 2. If not used with the current development, any wells which service the existing property should be abandoned by a licensed contractor. Response: Acknowledged. Callout note refers to MDH requirements. 3. The existing septic system should be abandoned by a licensed contractor. Response: Acknowledged. Callout note refers to MPCA requirements. Response to Engineering Review Comments Page 8 of 8 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN September 7, 2021 Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding the responses to comments and/or revised plans. Sincerely, Civil Engineering Design, LLC Scott Dahlke Professional Engineer Cc: File 00796 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us Memo To: Planning (Planner Lindahl) From: Planner Davis Date: May 5, 2021 Re: Garages Too Corcoran (City File No. 21-016) A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on 05/05/2021. In attendance were: Director of Public Safety Gottschalk, Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Planner Davis, Fire Chief Feist, Fire Chief Dave Malewicki, Fire Chief Leuer, and Building Official Geske. The comments are based on revised plans submitted April 20, 2021. The steep slope surrounding the site presents some fire protection challenges. The following public safety comments are provided for the project: 1. Fire barriers will be required in buildings to create fire areas of less than 12,000 square feet; otherwise, the buildings will need to be sprinkled. 2. The requirement for a 150’ hose pull distance must be met throughout the site. The current plans do not reflect this for buildings C and D. 3. A 300’ hose pull distance is permitted if the buildings are sprinkled, or if the applicant wants to claim a topographic waiver as outlined in the International Fire Code 503.1.1.1, the applicant must meet with the Fire Chiefs and the Building Official to determine a sufficient alternative fire protection system. 4. The 24’ roadway to the site was deemed sufficient by the Public Safety Group. 5. A turning radius exhibit is required for the site. From:Ryan Burns To:Natalie Davis; Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Kevin Mattson; Kent C. Torve; Matt Gottschalk; Michael Pritchard Cc:Jeff Leuer (jleuer@ci.loretto.mn.us); Todd Geske Subject:RE: Distribution #21-016 Garages Too Corcoran - Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit, Variance, and Site Plan Date:Wednesday, June 23, 2021 3:11:33 PM Attachments:image002.png image003.png Fire Chief Leuer and Building Official Geske discussed and approved the plan to have fire connections on the front of the building that connect to the rear of the building. Fire would haul an apartment pack to the rear of the building, connect in the rear to the source from the front, and no need not pull a hose around the building. Kind of like a fire riser in multi-story building, instead of going up, they would be going through the building. They will not be sprinkled buildings. Ryan Burns | Lieutenant City of Corcoran | 8200 County Road 116 | Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: (763) 420-8966 | rburns@ci.corcoran.mn.us | | From: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 2:09 PM To: Kendra Lindahl Forwarding <klindahl@landform.net>; Kevin Mattson <kmattson@corcoranmn.gov>; Kent C. Torve <ktorve@wenck.com>; Ryan Burns <rburns@corcoranmn.gov>; Matt Gottschalk <mgottschalk@corcoranmn.gov>; Michael Pritchard <MPritchard@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Distribution #21-016 Garages Too Corcoran - Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit, Variance, and Site Plan Good afternoon, Please find enclosed updated plans for Garages Too. Matt – The applicant believes they addressed Public Safety’s comments by incorporating fire department connections on the front and back walls of Buildings C and D, but Kendra and I are uncertain if this truly satisfies the requirements of a 150’ maximum hose pull distance (or outfitting the buildings with sprinklers). Thank you, Natalie Davis Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 www.ci.corcoran.mn.us ndavis@corcoranmn.gov Direct: 763-258-4272 Main: 763-420-2288 City of Corcoran - A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 An equal opportunity employer MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 May 25,2021 Natalie Davis Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 SUBJECT: MnDOT Review #S21-031 Garages Too-Corcoran NW Quad MN 55 & Rolling Hills Road Corcoran, Hennepin County Dear Ms. Davis: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Garages Too-Corcoran. MnDOT has reviewed the documents and has the following comments: Traffic: MnDOT recommends providing main access from Horseshoe Bend Dr, rather than having customers with trailers accessing the site from a horizontal curve on a high-speed, high-volume roadway without turn lanes. If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact Eric Lauer-Hunt of MnDOT Traffic at eric.lauer-hunt@state.mn.us or 651-234-7875. Permits: An Access permit will be required. Additionally, any use of, or work within or affecting, MnDOT right of way will require a permit. Permits can be applied for at this site: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload a copy of this letter when applying for any permits. Please direct questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig of MnDOT’s Metro Permits Section at Buck.Craig@state.mn.us or 651-234-7911. Review Submittal Options MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 1. Email documents and plans in PDF format to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 megabytes per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each message. 2. PDF file(s) uploaded to MnDOT’s external shared internet workspace site at: https://mft.dot.state.mn.us. Contact MnDOT Planning development review staff at metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us for uploading instructions, and send an email listing the file name(s) after the document(s) has/have been uploaded. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234-7797. Sincerely, Cameron Muhic Senior Planner Copy sent via E-Mail: Buck Craig, Permits Lance Schowalter, Design Jason Swenson, Water Resources Eric Lauer-Hunt, Traffic Andrew Lutaya, Area Manager Douglas Nelson, Right-of-Way Mackenzie Turner Bargen, Multimodal Jesse Thornsen, Multimodal Jason Junge, Transit Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC 22400 State Highway 55 Corcoran, Minnesota 09/07/2021 Page 1 Executive Summary Storage space is in demand and this development responds to fill that need for the area surrounding the West Metro of Hennepin County. The buildings are attractive, well-built and will be a welcomed addition to the City of Corcoran. Overview Garages Too, LLC proposes this project for the City of Corcoran’s consideration. The Project will be located at 22400 State Highway 55 in Corcoran, Minnesota. Building spaces will be leased to companies and private individuals seeking protected and secure storage for their possessions ranging from company vehicles, supplies, automobiles, recreational vehicles, pickup trucks and trailers. However, no commercial-type vehicles are allowed within these units. Each rental space has its own entrance, its individual level of interior finishes, its own power, heat and lighting. Home-based businesses located in the City of Corcoran and surrounding communities will now have an option to office out of their home per city ordinances, but store their business equipment, supplies and other non-ordinance compliant items off-site in this facility. This option will allow Corcoran residents to conduct their business in compliance with city regulations and give each of them a better opportunity to succeed in their business ventures. While it is understood that storage items may be used in a tenant’s business, no retail or wholesale goods or services may be offered, performed, or sold on the premises or property All tenants will be required to sign a detailed lease and initial to confirm key lease terms. Tenant’s violation of the lease terms results in termination of the lease. Hours of daily operation shall be posted allowing activity from 7:00 am to 9:00 pm only. No retail sales of goods or services will be allowed as this is a storage facility use (S-1) not a business use (B). Each tenant will be required to furnish and maintain two fire extinguishers within each rental space. Repair of personal vehicles will be allowed within a given rental space, but specifically prohibited on all parking lots or drives. No public traffic or extended employee presence will be allowed for this development and no outdoor storage or over-night parking of any kind will be allowed on this property. To that end, Developer has arranged on-going towing services from Burda’s Towing for any violator- no exemptions granted. Access to the site will be controlled with a gate with electric controls and key code entry. Each tenant will have separate entry code. Landlord will suspend entry code function if any tenant violation of lease terms. The gate will be located approximately 300 feet north of the site access at Highway 55. A turn-around area will be cleared to allow vehicles to maneuver and drive out if necessary. This property will be equipped with surveillance equipment to maintain a high level of security for tenants without the need of perimeter fencing or access gates. Signage for the project will be limited to rental unit identification only located above the service door to each rental unit; no other signage will be allowed. Garages Too has contacted adjacent residential land owners adjoining to the north and east boundaries of the existing parcel. Garages Too proposes landscape improvements at select locations on some adjoining properties that will result in enhanced screening of the proposed development. Garages Too also proposes a lot line adjustment with cooperation of the adjoining residential land owner at the northeast corner of the existing property. The existing residential lot (6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive) is owned by Benjamin and Mercedes Elsen and they are supportive of the lot line adjustment and replat of their lot. The existing lot has an existing home, garage, and other residential improvements. The home, garage, and driveway as currently configured on the existing lot provides minimal rear yard and side yard spaces. The replat and increased lot area would provide additional rear/side yard space which would be beneficial to the residential lot. Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC 22400 State Highway 55 Corcoran, Minnesota 09/07/2021 Page 2 Programming / CUP Standards Business model research revealed area market needs in the leasing of large volume storage spaces. This was evident in the West Metro of Hennepin County for small service-oriented businesses as well as certain private individuals. To meet this market need the Project has been designed with the following features: 1) Four Total Structures- development proposes four (4) stand-alone buildings to maximize development in most efficient manner (identified as Buildings “A” thru “D”); all buildings are non- sprinkled (NS) 2) Buildings “B”, “C” and “D” have been technically divided into two separate fire areas through the use of a 3-hour fire resistance rated wall assembly meeting the requirements of the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code; their designation is shown as “B1” / “B2”, “C1” / “C2” and “D1” / “D2”. 3) Reason for this division for buildings “B”, “C” and “D” is to comply with the building code for buildings of the indicated size supporting S-1 Moderate Hazard use of these spaces (see Building Area Calculations on sheet #PR-1). 4) Building “A” Signature Unit- storage unit with special features identifying it as the main focal point of project (includes the common facility maintenance space) 5) Typical Rental Unit a) Large Warehouse Space- 12’ x 12’ high overhead door; 60’ to 70’ depth for large items b) Electrical Service- 200amp with separate / individual meters c) Heating System- ceiling mounted individual direct-fired natural gas heaters for each unit 6) Lease1 between Garages Too (Landlord) and Tenant includes key terms: a) Use is storage. Can not be used for residential, retail, wholesale, or services. b) Access limitation to 7:00am to 9:00pm. Limitation to 3 hours on site on any day. c) No parking on the property 9:00pm to 7:00am. Burdah’s Towing authorized to tow vehicles. d) No tenant signage allowed. e) No tenant alterations or improvements to the property. f) No tenant alteration or modification to electric service. g) Tenant to hang and maintain two (2) fire extinguishers within unit. h) Landlord has a lien on all personal property items within unit. i) Base rent payable monthly and due first day of each month. j) Late fees will be incurred if rent not paid timely. k) Upon termination of lease, tenant required to remove all personal property or pay cleanout fee. l) Failure to comply with requirements will result in termination and loss of access. Site Development The existing 20 foot wide access drive will be upgraded to a 24 foot wide road to provide access to the facility. An access easement exists to allow site access from Highway 55. No change to Highway 55 is anticipated other than connected to the wider access road. No turn lane improvements are required for Highway 55 as this facility will generate only 20 trips per day far below the 100 daily trips threshold required for any new turn lane2. Chapter 3 of Mn/DOT Access Management Manual includes a series of requirements or warrants when considering design criteria for its roadway system3. None of the 9 warrants listed are triggered by this project. Four separate buildings are served by bituminous paving. Surface storm water will be collected and routed to a storm water management basin Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC 22400 State Highway 55 Corcoran, Minnesota 09/07/2021 Page 3 on-site with discharge on-grade. The discharge point is protected with rip-rap to address erosion. No exterior storage of any kind is allowed on the property. Landscape Design Landscape design is proposed that is reasonable and appropriate for the proposed development. Tree plantings are proposed with a variety of coniferous and deciduous trees with a quantity that exceeds the city requirement based on building square footage by code 1060.070.2.G.2. Tree plantings are proposed along the north and east sides of the site to provide buffer screening from adjacent residential properties. Existing trees in the southern portion of the east boundary are proposed to remain to the extent possible. Adjacent properties to the west and south are zoned I-1 Light Industrial and future like kind uses are anticipated. Trees are proposed along the south side of the site with a typical spacing of 50 ft. Trees are not proposed along the west boundary due to topography and retaining wall issues. Shrub plantings are proposed along select building walls that have primary visibility from adjacent residential properties. Shrub plantings are proposed along the east and north walls of Building A, and on the east wall of Building C. The total number of shrubs proposed is less than the calculation result based on building square footage required by code 1060.070.2.G.2. The number of shrubs proposed does exceed the calculation result based on site perimeter required by code 1060.070.2.G.2. Building Construction Project consists of four (4) masonry structures, using decorative masonry units for all exterior walls and wood roof trusses with asphalt shingle roofing, pre-finished metal fascia, and soffits; 14’-0” truss bearing height, pre-finished doors and windows (see attached Drawings); Building “A”– 5 individual rental units; the signature design feature is finished with stone veneer base and stone cap, lap siding and trim; includes the Facility Maintenance space required for ordinary repairs and upkeep of the buildings and grounds. Building “B” Fire Area “B1” – 7 individual rental units; Building “B” Fire Area “B2” – 6 individual rental units; Building “C” Fire Area “C1” – 6 individual rental units; Building “C” Fire Area “C2” – 5 individual rental units; Building “D” Fire Area “D1” – 6 individual rental units; Building “D” Fire Area “D2” – 2 individual rental units; Total Individual Rental Units – 37 No outdoor / exterior storage is allowed at any time. Variances Standards Variance #1- 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive (proposed Lot 2): Residential Lot Size and Width The project proposes to replat the existing residential lot (Lot 4, Block 2, Schnell’s Highland Acres 2nd Addition) with additional land resulting in an increased residential lot area. Variance is needed to the lot area and lot width standards of current zoning designation UR Urban Reserve for the residential lot. UR zoning requires a minimum 20 acre lot area and minimum 300 ft lot width. Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC 22400 State Highway 55 Corcoran, Minnesota 09/07/2021 Page 4 The existing lot is a legal non-conforming lot since it does not confirm to current UR zoning lot area or lot width standards. The lot was of record prior to adoption of the current UR zoning standards. The existing lot area is 1.67 acres. The replat will result in a lot area of 2.12 acres (increase of 0.45 acres). No change is proposed to the existing lot width which is approximately 280 ft at Horseshoe Bend Drive. No change is proposed to current access to the lot which is off of Horseshoe Bend Drive. No access will be provided from the 2240 State Highway 55 property as part of the replat. The lot line modification provided by the plat is beneficial to the properties included in the plat. There are no negative impacts to adjoining properties. The proposed land use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variance #2- 22400 State Highway 55 (proposed Lot 1): Industrial Lot Width and Front Setback This existing lot of record has no frontage on a public street. This is an existing condition not created by the owner. Variance is needed to the required 100 ft lot width and building setback standards of proposed I-1 Light Industrial zoning since the existing lot (and resulting platted lot) has no frontage on a public street. The lot width requirement and front setback requirement cannot be met for proposed Lot 1 as there is no public street adjoining the property. City staff has clarified that the front is determined to be the lot line where access is provided (south). The project does propose building locations that provide a minimum 50 ft building setback from the south, north, and east lot lines. Since the south lot line is interpreted to be the front, the project does provide a 50 ft setback from the interpreted front (south). There are no negative impacts to adjoining properties. The proposed land use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variance #3- 22400 State Highway 55: Parking and Drive Aisle Setback to South Property Line This existing lot of record has no frontage on a public street. This is an existing condition not created by the owner. City staff has clarified that the front is determined to be the lot line where access is provided (south). Variance is needed to the required parking and drive aisle 50 ft setback from front for I-1 zoning. Sufficient driveway and maneuvering space is needed for fire/safety access to all buildings and circulation within the site. Sufficient driveway and maneuvering space is needed to access the building tenant spaces from the south. The project does propose curb setback at 10 ft from south lot line. Adjacent property to the south is I-1 zoned property. Future development of the adjacent property would allow for curb at 10 ft from the same lot line. Compliance with the required 50 ft setback is not practical, would result in an inefficient use of land, and would not provide acceptable fire/safety access. There are no negative impacts to adjoining properties. The proposed land use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variance #4- 22400 State Highway 55: Municipal Services requirement waiver Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC 22400 State Highway 55 Corcoran, Minnesota 09/07/2021 Page 5 The property is located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is in stage 2030-2035 of the Sanitary Sewer Plan. Since the site is located inside of the MUSA boundary, city code requires it to be developed with sewer and water. Variance is needed to the requirement for municipal services. The proposed use (interior storage) of the project does not need municipal sanitary sewer or municipal water services. No office or bathroom facilities will be provided within tenant spaces. There are no negative impacts to adjoining properties. The proposed land use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Footnotes: 1 Standard Lease between Garages Too and Tenant (attached) 2 Tod Sherman Email, dated 12-14-20 (attached) Tod Sherman, Planning Director Office of Planning, Program Management and Transit 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 (651) 234-7794 Tod.sherman@state.mn.us 3 Mn/DOT Access Management Manual – Chapter 3 Section 3.4.9 Turn Lanes http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html 1 LEASE THIS LEASE is made as of _____________________________________, 20 ____ between ______________________________________________________________________("Landlord") and _____________________________________ ("Tenant"). * * * * * * CONTACT INFORMATION FOR LANDLORD, TENANT AND PERSONAL GUARANTOR TENANT: Principal Contact Person (Name and Relation to Tenant): Address: Email Address: Phone Number No. 1 (for text messages) Phone Number No. 2 _ PERSONAL GUARANTOR(S) Name of Personal Guarantor(s), and Relation to Tenant Address: Email Address: Phone Number No. 1 (for text messages) Phone Number No. 2 _ 2 LANDLORD Address: SUMMARIES OF CERTAIN SECTIONS The following are short summaries of, and references to Sections in the Lease, regarding certain matters and requirements to which Landlord wants to direct Tenant’s attention. Accordingly, Tenant must initial, in the Initial Box next to each item below in order to confirm that Tenant has read and understands each of the short summaries and the referred to Sections of the Lease. These summaries are for reference only, and are not exhaustive of the subject matter included in the summaries. These summaries shall not be interpreted as affecting Tenant’s obligation to read the Lease in its entirety. No. Item Section in Lease Initial Box 1 The Premises may only be used for the sole purpose of the storage of the Tenant’s personal or business property. The Premises or Property cannot be used for “residential” purposes or the operation of a business. Specifically, but not by way of limitation, no retail or wholesale goods or services may be offered, performed, or sold at the Premises or Property. 3 2. Access to the Property or the Premises is limited to the period of time between 7:00 am and 9:00 pm, daily. Tenant may not be on the Premises for more than a total of three (3) hours on any day. 3 3 Vehicles shall not be parked on the Property between the hours of 9:00 pm and 7:00 am. Any vehicle parked on the Property by the Tenant or Tenant’s agents, employees or invitees between the hours of 9:00 pm and 7:00 am will be towed. All costs related to any such towing and resulting storage shall be the sole responsibility of the Tenant. Burda Towing, Rogers, Minnesota has contracted with the Landlord to patrol the Property and tow any vehicles which are in violation of this requirement. All costs of such towing and resulting storage will be the direct responsibility of the Tenant, who shall promptly pay the towing company directly. 3 4 Tenant may not place any signage on the Property or the Premises without the consent of the Landlord; and, Tenant may not otherwise advertise or represent that the Premises or 19 3 Property is a place of business. 5 There shall be no alterations or improvements to the Premises without the express written consent of Landlord. 10 6 Tenant shall not make, or allow to be made, any alterations or improvements to the electrical service for the Premises, without the express written consent of the Landlord, which consent may be conditioned on the approval of a licensed electrician to perform such alterations or improvements, and confirmation that they will be made in full compliance with any applicable code. For the purposes of this prohibition, Tenant may not move, remove, or change any of the outlets or fuse/circuit breaker panel in the Premises. In addition, Tenant shall make sure that the wall sixteen (16) inches on either side of the electric panel is free from any obstruction so that the electrical panel can be accessed by Landlord or any inspector(s). 10 7 Tenant shall be required to hang and maintain two (2) operable fire extinguishers in the Premises. One shall be hung and maintained in the front of the Premises by the main door; and the second one shall be hung and maintained on the back wall of the Premises. Landlord shall be permitted to inspect the Premises in order to confirm compliance with this requirement every six (6) months during the Term. In addition, at Landlord’s sole discretion, if the Tenant does not hang and maintain operable fire extinguishers as required, Landlord may hang fire extinguishers as required above, the cost of which be due and payable immediately as Additional Rent, and Tenant will be obligated to maintain any such fire extinguishers. 3 8 The Landlord has a lien on all personal property in the Premises and has the right to prohibit access to Premises if the Rent is not paid in a timely manner. 28 9 The Base Rent payable in monthly installments must be paid in such a manner that the installments are received by the Landlord on or before the first day of the month. 6 10 Substantial Late Fees will be incurred and must be paid if the Rent payments are not made on a timely basis. 7 11 Upon the termination of the Lease, the Tenant is required to remove all personal property and trash from the Premises, and return the Premises to the same condition as they were in at the time of the commencement of the Lease. If this requirement is 4 not met, Landlord will remove the personal property and trash, clean the Premises, and the Tenant shall pay a “clean out” fee in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000). 26 12 ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THIS SUMMARY SECTION WILL BE CONSIDERED A MATERIAL BREACH OF THIS LEASE RESULTING IN IMMEDIATE TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE AND LOSS OF ACCESS TO PREMISES AND THE PROPERTY. 3 ************************** 1. Premises. Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant hereby leases from Landlord a portion of the property located at ___________________________________________________ (“Property”), which portion is commonly referred to as Unit No. ____________________, and is depicted as crosshatch on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Premises"). 2. Term. The term of this Lease is two (2) years, and shall commence on ______________________________________ (the "Commencement Date") and shall expire on ________________________________ ("Expiration Date),” unless earlier terminated as provided in this Lease. If for any reason, Landlord cannot deliver possession of the Premises to Tenant on the Commencement Date, this Lease shall not be void or voidable, nor shall Landlord or its agents be liable to Tenant for any loss or damage resulting from such delay. In that event, however, the Commencement Date shall be extended for the period of such delay except that if in Landlord's judgment any part of the delay is caused by Tenant, rent shall not be abated for the period of delay caused by Tenant. Landlord will use reasonable good faith efforts to deliver the Premises to Tenant on or before the Commencement Date. If Landlord determines that it cannot deliver possession of the Premises to Tenant, Landlord may by notice to Tenant terminate this Lease without any liability to Tenant, in which case Tenant shall have no further liability to Landlord. In no event shall the expiration of this Lease be extended beyond the Expiration Date. 3. Use of the Premises and Property. Access to the Premises and the Property is limited to the period of time between 7:00 am, and 9:00 pm daily. Tenant may not be on the Premises for more than a total of three (3) hours on any day. The Tenant’s use of the Premises shall be for the sole purpose of the storage of Tenant’s personal or business property. The Premises or Property cannot be used for “residential” purposes. For the purposes of this section, the term “residential purposes” includes, but is not limited to, activity such as sleeping or napping; watching television or video screens; consumption of alcohol or illegal drugs; sitting or resting on furniture or other items being stored in the Premises; cooking; congregating with others in the Premises except for the purposes of moving stored items in or out of the Premises; or, studying. While it is understood that the Premises may be used for the storage of personal property which is used, or may be used, in the Tenant’s business, the Premises or Property cannot be used for the operation of a business. Specifically, but not by way of limitation, no retail or wholesale goods or services may be offered, performed, or sold on the Premises or Property. 5 Tenant shall not store, keep or place anything outside the Premises, except during the moving in or removal of stored items in the Premises. Vehicles shall not be parked on the Property between the hours of 9:00 pm and 7:00 am. Any vehicle parked on the Property by the Tenant or Tenant’s agents, employees or invitees between the hours of 9:00 pm and 7:00 am will be towed. Burda Towing, Rogers, Minnesota, has contracted with the Landlord to patrol the Property and tow any vehicles which are in violation of this requirement. All costs of such towing and resulting storage will be the direct responsibility of the Tenant, who shall promptly pay the towing company directly. Tenant shall not park or store any vehicles, equipment, or trailers in any areas of the Property for any continuous period in excess of two (2) hours without Landlord’s prior written consent, which consent may be granted or denied in the sole discretion of the Landlord. Tenant shall be required to hang and maintain two (2) operable fire extinguishers in the Premises. One shall be hung and maintained in the front of the Premises by the main door; and the second one shall be hung and maintained on the back wall of the Premises. Landlord shall be permitted to inspect the Premises in order to confirm compliance with this requirement every six (6) months during the Term. In addition, at Landlord’s sole discretion, if the Tenant does not hang and maintain operable fire extinguishers as required, Landlord may hang fire extinguishers as required above, the cost of which be due and payable immediately as Additional Rent, and Tenant will be obligated to maintain any such fire extinguishers. It is specifically acknowledged that tenant is responsible for the conduct of any person or persons who are on the Property or Premises as Tenants guests, invitees, or permittees. Accordingly, any conduct by such guest , invitee, or permittee which does not comply with the requirements and restrictions set forth in this section, or other applicable sections of this Lease, shall be deemed to be an Event of Default by the Tenant, allowing Landlord to exercise its rights and remedies as set forth in Section 28 of this Lease or elsewhere. TENANT HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SUMMARY SECTION AND SECTIONS REFERRED TO THEREIN WILL BE CONSIDERED A MATERIAL BREACH OF THIS LEASE RESULTING IN IMMEDIATE TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE AND LOSS OF ACCESS TO PREMISES AND THE PROPERTY. 4. Base Rent. Tenant will pay Landlord Base Rent in the sum of _______________________________________, per month. The Base Rent shall be payable as provided in Section 6 of this Leases. 5. Additional Rent. It is the express intent of the parties that Tenant will pay, as Additional Rent, the cost of all utilities and communication services, including water and power, sewer, heating (steam or other), lighting, air conditioning and ventilating the Premises (“Utilities”). If the Utilities are sub- metered to the Premises, Tenant shall make arrangements with the utility provider to bill the Tenant directly. If the Utilities to the Premises are not sub-metered Tenant shall pay to Landlord, as Additional Rent, the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50) per month, which amount shall be paid together with the monthly payments described in Section 6. All charges payable according to the terms of the Lease, including, but not limited to Late Charges, shall be considered Additional Rent, due according to the terms of the lease. The Base Rent together with Utilities and any other Additional Rent shall be collectively referred to as "Gross Rental." Tenant shall timely pay Utilities as required by the utility provider. 6 6. Rent Payment and Security Deposit. Base Rent shall be paid to the Landlord, in lawful money of the United States, in monthly installments. The monthly installments shall be mailed or personally delivered to the Landlord at the Address of the Landlord as set forth above, or such other address as may hereafter designated in writing. The Base Rent shall be paid in monthly installments mailed or delivered to the Landlord. The first installment of is due on execution of this Lease. Subsequent monthly installments of Base Rent of are due on or before the first day of each calendar month beginning on ________________________, and continuing until the expiration of the term of this Lease. Rent is due as provided in this Lease, without demand and without any reduction, abatement, counterclaim or setoff. If the term of this Lease commences on other than the first day of a month or terminates on other than the last day of a month, then the monthly installments of Base Rent provided for herein for such month or months shall be prorated and paid in advance. If a monthly installment is sent to the Landlord via mail, it shall be mailed at such time so that it is received by the Landlord not later than the first day of the month. A security deposit to secure the Tenant’s performance under this Lease in the amount of _______________________________ shall also be due on the execution of this Lease. 7. Late Charge. Late payment by Tenant of any rent or other sums due under this Lease will cause Landlord to incur costs not contemplated by this Lease, the exact amount of such costs being difficult and impracticable to ascertain. Such costs include, without limitation, processing and accounting charges and late charges that may be imposed on Landlord by the terms of any encumbrance on or note secured by the Premises. Therefore, if any rent is not paid within five (5) days after it is due or any other sum due from Tenant is not paid when due, Tenant shall pay to Landlord an additional sum of Seventy-Five and no/100 Dollars ($75.00). If any rent remains unpaid ten (10) days after it is due, Tenant shall pay to Landlord an additional sum of $250.00, which represents a fair and reasonable estimate of the costs that Landlord will incur by reason of any such late payment. Additionally, all delinquent rent or other sums, plus this late charge, shall bear interest at the lesser of the then maximum lawful contract rate permitted to be charged by Landlord, or 18% per annum (the "Default Rate"). All interest and late charges owed pursuant to this section shall referred to as “Late Charges” and considered Additional Rent. 8. Definitions. For the purpose of this Lease, the following are additional defined terms; (a) "Building" means the structure(s) situated on the Property, whether now or hereinafter constructed. 9. Acceptance of Premises. Taking of possession of the Premises by Tenant shall be conclusive evidence that the Premises was, on that date, in good, clean and Tenantable condition, and that Tenant has accepted the Premises "AS IS." Tenant acknowledges that no representations as to the repair of the Property or promises to alter, remodel or improve the Property, have been made by Landlord, except as may be provided in Exhibit B or in another writing signed by the parties. 10. Alterations, Additions, Improvements by Tenant. Tenant agrees not to make or allow to be made any alterations or physical additions in or about the Property without first obtaining the written consent of Landlord, which consent may be granted, withheld, or conditioned in Landlord’s sole discretion. Specifically, but not by way of limitation, Tenant shall not make or allow any alterations or improvements to the electrical service for the Premises without the express written consent of the Landlord, which consent may be conditioned on the approval of a licensed electrician to perform such alterations or improvements, and confirmation that they will be made in compliance with any applicable codes. For the purposes of this prohibition, Tenant may not move, remove, or change any of the outlets or the fuse/circuit 7 breaker panel in the Premises. In addition, Tenant shall make sure that the wall sixteen (16) inches on either side of the electric panel is free from any obstruction so that the electrical panel can be accessed by Landlord or any inspector(s). 11. Tenant Equipment. Tenant shall not install any other equipment of any kind or nature whatsoever which will or may require any changes, replacements, or additions to or in the use of heating, air conditioning, electrical or plumbing systems of the Property or of the Building without first obtaining the prior written consent of Landlord, which consent may be granted, withheld, or conditioned in Landlord’s sole discretion. . 12. Maintenance and Repairs. Tenant shall maintain Utilities to the Premises. Tenant agrees to keep the inside and outside of the Premises clean and maintain the Premises in good repair, ordinary wear and tear excepted, at its sole expense. Tenant shall not paint or decorate any part of the interior or exterior of the Premises or any part of the interior of the Premises visible from the exterior, nor post or any signs visible from the exterior of the Premises. Tenant shall maintain the Premises in a clean, orderly and sanitary condition and free from all insects, rodents, vermin and other pests. Tenant shall remove any garbage, trash, rubbish or refuse on a regular basis in accordance with local codes; Tenant shall maintain the Premises, including in good repair, all mechanical, electrical and plumbing apparatus within the Premises, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Tenant shall replace promptly, at its expense, any broken door closers and any cracked or broken glass of the Premises with glass of like kind and quality, and replace all light bulbs and tubes when no longer serviceable. Landlord shall exercise reasonable diligence to remove snow from the parking areas of the Property and other areas which provide access to the Premises. Any and all damages or injury to the Property or Premises caused by moving the property of Tenant in or out of the Property, or due to the same being on the Property, shall be repaired by and at the sole cost of Tenant. 13. Mechanic's Liens. Tenant will not permit any mechanic's, laborer's or materials supplier's liens to stand against the Property or the Building for any labor or material furnished to or on account of Tenant, or claimed to have been so furnished in connection with any work performed or claimed to have been performed in, or about the Property. Tenant shall indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from and against any and all losses, liabilities, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, based on or arising out of asserted claims or liens against the Tenant's leasehold estate or against the right, title and interest of the Landlord in the Premises, the Building, or the Property on account of any labor performed or materials furnished in connection with any work performed by, or at the instance of, Tenant. 14. Compliance with Ordinances, Rules and Regulations; Nuisances. (a) Tenant agrees not to occupy or use, or permit any portion of the Property to be occupied or used for any business or purpose which is unlawful, disreputable, or deemed to be extra hazardous on account of fire, or permit anything to be done which would in any way increase the rate of fire or other insurance coverage on the Building or its contents; and if any increase in the rate of fire or other insurance is stated by any insurance company or by the applicable insurance rating bureau to be due to the activity or equipment of Tenant in, on or about the Property, such statement shall be conclusive evidence that such increase in such rate is due to such activity and/or equipment and as a result thereof, Tenant shall be liable 8 for such increase and shall reimburse Landlord therefore. (b) Tenant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, orders, rules and regulations now or hereafter in force which impose a duty on Landlord or Tenant relating to the use, condition alteration or occupancy of the Premises and the Property. Tenant will comply with the rules of the Landlord adopted by Landlord from time to time for the safety, care and cleanliness of the Property, the Premises, and the Building and for the preservation of good order therein. (c) Tenant agrees to control its agents, employees, and invitees in such manner as not to create any nuisance, or interfere with, annoy or disturb any other tenant or Landlord in its use or operation of the Property. (d) Tenant represents, warrants, and covenants to Landlord that Tenant shall at no time use or permit the Property to be used in violation of any statute, regulation, rule, order or governmental determination of any kind whatsoever which relate to or govern hazardous materials and/or environmental conditions. Tenant shall assume sole and full responsibility for, and shall remedy at its sole cost and expense, all such violations, and fully indemnify Landlord from any liability for any such violation. 15. Landlord's Right of Entry. Tenant agrees to permit Landlord, or its agents or representatives, upon reasonable notice to Tenant, to enter into any part of the Property at all reasonable hours to inspect the same, clean, make repairs, alterations or additions thereto or exhibit the Premises to prospective Tenants, purchasers or others, or for other reasonable purposes as Landlord may deem necessary or desirable, and Tenant shall not be entitled to any abatement or reduction of Base Rent, Operating Costs, or any other sums due under this Lease by reason of any inconvenience, annoyance or injury to business caused by any such activities. Landlord has the right to enter upon the Property at any time with or without notice in case of emergency. 16. Assignment or Sublease by Tenant. (a) Tenant shall not assign, encumber or in any manner transfer this Lease or any interest therein nor sublet the Property or any part or parts thereof, nor permit occupancy by anyone without the prior written consent of Landlord, which consent may be granted, withheld, or conditioned in the sole discretion of the Landlord. Consent by the Landlord to one or more assignments of this Lease or to one or more sub-lettings of the Property shall not operate as a waiver of Landlord's rights under this Section. No assignment or other such encumbrance or transfer shall release Tenant of any of its obligations under this Lease or be construed or taken as a waiver of any of Landlord's rights hereunder. The acceptance of rent from someone other than Tenant shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any of the provisions of this Lease or consent to any assignment or subletting of the Property. Landlord shall have the right to terminate this Lease in the event of Tenant's failure to comply with the terms of this Section. (b) Neither this Lease nor any interest therein shall pass to any trustees or receiver in bankruptcy, or any assignee for the benefit of creditors, or by operation of law. This Lease shall terminate upon the happening of any one of the events in this sub-paragraph (b) or subparagraph (d). (c) Tenant shall promptly pay to Landlord as Additional Rent hereunder any rent or other payments pursuant to any sublease which exceed the amounts payable hereunder and all other consideration paid or to be paid by reason of any assignment or sublease. (d) No interest of Tenant in this Lease shall be assignable by involuntary assignment through operation of law (including without limitation the transfer of this Lease by will, intestacy, merger, 9 consolidation, dissolution or foreclosure), including, but not limited to the following occurrences; (1) Tenant becomes insolvent as defined in the Federal Bankruptcy Code, admits in writing its insolvency or its present or prospective inability to pay its debts as they become due, is unable to or does not pay all or any material portion (in number or dollar amount) of its debts as they become due, permits or suffers a judgment against it which affects Tenant's ability to conduct its business in the ordinary course, (unless enforcement thereof is stayed pending appeal), makes or proposes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, convenes or proposes to convene a meeting of its creditors, or any class thereof, for purposes of effecting a moratorium upon, or extension or composition of its debts, proposes any such moratorium, extension, or composition, or commences or proposes to commence any bankruptcy, reorganization, or insolvency proceeding, or other proceeding under any provision or chapter of the Federal Bankruptcy Code or any other federal, state, or other law for the relief of debtors. (2) Tenant fails to obtain the dismissal, within thirty (30) days after the commencement thereof, of any bankruptcy, reorganization, or insolvency proceeding, or other proceeding, or other proceeding under any law for the relief of debtors, instituted against it by one or more third parties or fails actively to oppose any such proceeding, or, in any such proceeding, defaults or files an answer admitting the material allegations upon which the proceeding was based or alleges its willingness to have an order for relief entered or its desire to seek liquidation, reorganization, or adjustment of any of its debts. (3) Any receiver, trustee, or custodian is appointed to take possession of all or any assets of Tenant or any committee of Tenant's creditor, or any class thereof, is formed for the purpose of monitoring or investigating the financial affairs of Tenant or enforcing such creditors' rights. 17. Subordination to Mortgage. Tenant covenants and agrees that this Lease is subject and subordinate to any mortgage or deed of trust which may now or hereafter encumber the Property, and to all renewals, modifications, consolidations, replacements and extensions thereof. This clause shall be self operative and no further instrument of subordination need be requested by any mortgagee. In confirmation of such subordination, however, Tenant shall at Landlord's request execute promptly any appropriate certificate, instrument or other document that Landlord may request. In the event of the enforcement by the trustee, mortgagee or the beneficiary under any such mortgage of the remedies provided for by law or by such mortgage, Tenant will, upon receiving an assurance of nondisturbance from any person or parties succeeding to the interest of Landlord as a result of such enforcement, and upon request therefrom, automatically become the Tenant of, and attorn hereunder to, such successor in interest without change in the terms or other provisions of this Lease. Within 10 days of receipt of written request by such successor in interest, Tenant shall execute and deliver any instrument or instruments prepared by such successor in interest confirming the attornment herein provided for. Notwithstanding any foregoing provision hereof to the contrary, if the mortgagee or holder of any Mortgage hereinbefore described elects to have Tenant's interest in this Lease superior to any such instrument, then by notice to Tenant from such mortgagee or holder, this Lease shall be deemed superior to such lien whether this Lease was executed before or after said mortgage. Tenant shall at any time hereafter on demand execute any instruments, releases or other document which may be required by any such mortgagee or holder for the purpose of evidencing the superiority of this Lease to the lien of any such mortgage. 18. Estoppel Certificate. At Landlord's request, Tenant will execute an estoppel certificate addressed to any mortgagee, assignee or any other transferee of Landlord certifying as to information required by such mortgagee, trustee, assignee or transferee and agreeing to such notice provisions and other 10 matters as any mortgagee may reasonably require in connection with Landlord's transfer or financing. 19. Signs and Graphics; Advertising. Tenant shall not be permitted to place any lettering, signage, advertisement, notice or object and shall not permit any such display on any windows or doors or on the outside of the perimeter walls of the Premises or Property or any other portion of the outside or inside of the Property, except with the prior written consent of Landlord, which consent may be granted, withheld, or conditioned in Landlord’s sole discretion. Any sign, lettering, or other display not approved by the Landlord may be removed by it and the cost of such removal and the restoration of the Property resulting therefrom shall be deemed Additional Rent and paid forthwith by Tenant. Tenant may not otherwise advertise or represent that the Premises or Property is a place of business. 20. Acceptance of Goods. Tenant hereby releases Landlord, its agents and employees from any and all liabilities resulting from or related to the acceptance by Landlord of goods addressed to Tenant and delivered to the Building. 21. Tenant Insurance. (a) Tenant at its cost, shall maintain broad form comprehensive general liability insurance, including personal injury, property damage, products liability, completed operations and fire legal liability coverage with a single combined liability limit of not less than $1,000,000 for bodily injury, property damage and personal injury. Such coverage shall insure against all liability of Tenant and its authorized representatives arising out of or in connection with Tenant's use or occupancy of the Property. The broad form comprehensive liability insurance shall insure performance by Tenant of the indemnity provisions of this Lease, and the policy shall name Landlord as additional insured. (b) Tenant shall, at its cost, maintain workers' compensation and employers' liability insurance affording statutory workers' compensation benefits for the state in which the Property are located, if Tenant is obligated by law to provide such insurance, and employers' liability coverage in an amount not less than $100,000.00 (c) At its sole cost, Tenant shall maintain a policy of standard fire and extended coverage insurance with vandalism and malicious mischief endorsements and "all risk" coverage, including earthquake and flood, on all Tenant's property in or about the Property, for all of its full replacement value. Such insurance shall include Contingent Liability from Operation of Building Laws, demolition and increased costs to rebuild coverage’s; valuable papers and records coverage, providing for reproduction costs measure of recovery; and coverage for damage to electronic data processing equipment and media, including coverage of the perils of mechanical breakdown and electronic disturbance. The proceeds from any such policy shall be used by Tenant for the replacement of personal property and the restoration of Tenant's improvements or alterations, if any. Tenant may, with the prior written consent of Landlord, elect to have reasonable deductibles. (d) Tenant shall maintain all other insurance Landlord requires in connection with Tenant’s work or improvement of the Property, if any is expressly allowed by the Landlord. All insurance required to be provided by Tenant under this Lease shall be in a form, and in amounts acceptable to Landlord, and include a provision that they insurance will not be terminated or modified by the insurer without providing Landlord with thirty (30) days notice thereof. (e) If Tenant fails to comply with this Section, Landlord may obtain such insurance, and Tenant shall pay to Landlord upon demand as Additional Rent the premium cost thereof. 11 (f) Prior to the Tenant’s occupancy of the Premises, and at any time thereafter if requested by Landlord, Tenant shall provide Landlord with proof of all insurance required to be maintained by the Tenant pursuant to the provisions of this Lease. 22. Landlord's Obligations. Landlord agrees as follows: (a) To request public utilities to furnish any electricity and water utilized in operating any and all of the facilities serving the Property. (b) That Tenant shall and have the Property, subject to the other terms hereof, provided that Tenant pays the rental herein recited and performs all of Tenant's covenants and agreements herein contained. It is understood and agreed that this covenant and any and all other covenants of Landlord contained in this Lease shall be binding upon Landlord and its successors or assigns only with respect to breaches occurring during its and their respective ownership of the Landlord's interest hereunder. (c) Landlord shall insure the Property and maintain public liability insurance for the protection of Tenant and Landlord, as their interests may appear. If Landlord elects to insure the Property and maintain such insurance, the amounts thereof and the deductibles in connection therewith shall be determined by Landlord in its sole discretion, provided that the limits of said insurance for covering the Tenant’s personal property in the Premises shall be _______________________________. Tenant shall, as Additional Rent, pay, or reimburse Landlord for the premiums for any insurance obtained by Landlord within 10 days of Landlord’s request. 23. Assignment by Landlord. Landlord shall have the right to transfer and assign, in whole or in part, all its rights and obligations hereunder and in the Property, and in such event and upon its transferee's assumption of Landlord's obligations hereunder (any such transferee to have the benefit of, and be subject to, the provisions of this Lease), no further liability or obligations shall thereafter accrue against Landlord hereunder. Tenant agrees upon notice thereof to attorn to such transferee in accordance with the provisions of this Lease. 24. THIS SECTION INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. 25. Damage to Building. If the Building or any building located on the Property is damaged or destroyed by fire or other casualty, the Landlord shall have the right to terminate this Lease provided it gives written notice thereof to Tenant within ninety (90) days after such damage or destruction. If a portion of a building located on the Property is damaged by fire or other casualty and this Lease is not thereby terminated, the Landlord may, at its expense, restore the Property to as near the condition which existed prior to such damage or destruction as reasonably possible, and rent shall abate during such time if the Premises are untenantable, in the proportion that the untenantable portion of the Premises bears to the entire Property. Landlord shall not be responsible to the Tenant for damage to, or destruction of, Tenant's personal property any changes made by Tenant in, on or about the Premises, regardless of the cause of damage or destruction, except as may be expressly stated elsewhere herein. 26. Surrender of Premises; Holding Over. (a) Upon the expiration of the Term, the Tenant is required, at it’s own expense, to remove all personal property and trash from the Premises, and return the Premises to the same condition as they were in at the time of the commencement of the Lease. If this requirement is not met, Landlord, in its sole 12 discretion, will remove all personal property and trash, clean the Premises, and the Tenant shall pay a “clean out” fee in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000). Landlord shall be permitted to dispose of such personal property as Landlord sees fit, and Tenant waives all claims against Landlord for any damage to Tenant resulting from Landlord's retention or disposition of Tenant's personal property. (b) If Tenant, with Landlord's written consent, remains in possession of the Property after expiration of this Lease, such possession by Tenant shall be deemed to be a month-to-month tenancy on all provisions of this Lease, except those pertaining to term and rent. Tenant shall pay Base Rent in an amount equal to 125% of Base Rent for the last full calendar month during the regular term, which , which payments shall be made in monthly installments as described in to Section 6. Landlord shall have the rights provided it at law or in equity including, without limitation, the right to terminate Tenant's right to possession of the Property upon notice as provided by law with respect to month-to-month tenancies. 27. Attorneys' Fees and Court Costs. Tenant agrees to pay the Landlord’s attorneys' fees, court costs, and disbursements incurred by Landlord to enforce this Lease, or any part thereof, or collect any rent due, or to become due hereunder, or recovery of the possession of the Property. 28. Default by Tenant. If default be made in the payment of any sum to be paid by Tenant under this Lease, and default shall continue for fifteen (15) days; or, default shall be made in the performance of any of the other covenants or conditions which Tenant is required to observe and to perform; or if the interest of Tenant under this Lease shall be levied on under execution or other legal process; or if any petition shall be filed by or against Tenant to declare Tenant bankrupt or to delay, reduce or modify Tenant's debts or obligations, or if any petition shall be filed or other action taken to reorganize or modify Tenant's capital structure if Tenant is a corporation or other entity; or if Tenant be declared insolvent according to law, or if any assignment of Tenant's property shall be made for the benefit of creditors, or if a receiver or trustee is appointed for Tenant or its property; or if Tenant shall vacate or abandon the Property during the term of this Lease or any renewals or extensions thereof, then Landlord may treat the occurrence of any one or more of the foregoing events as a breach of this Lease (an “Event of Default”) and thereupon, at Landlord's option, Landlord may have any one or more of the following described remedies in addition to all other rights and remedies provided at law or in equity: (a) Landlord may terminate this Lease and forthwith repossess the Property and re-enter and remove all persons or property therefrom as permitted by law, and be entitled to recover forthwith as damages a sum of money equal to total of: (1) the cost of regaining possession of the Property, including the costs of removal of any personal property or trash in the Premises; (2) attorney's fees, costs and disbursements incurred by Landlord as a result of the Event of Defaul; (3) unpaid rent; (4) a sum equal to the entire amount of rent, including all amounts treated as Additional Rent hereunder, for the residue of the stated term hereof plus any other sums provided herein to be paid by Tenant for the remainder of the Lease term; and (5) any other amounts necessary or provided for under applicable law to compensate Landlord for all the detriment proximately caused by Tenant's failure to perform its obligations 13 under the Lease or which in the ordinary course of things would be likely to result therefrom. Landlord shall not be obligated to notify Tenant of the due date of rent nor demand payment thereof on its due date, the same being expressly waived by Tenant. The acceptance of any sums of money from Tenant less than the amount due, or after their due date, shall be taken to be payment on account by Tenant and shall not constitute a waiver by Landlord of any rights nor shall it reinstate the Lease or cure a default on the part of Tenant. All rights and remedies of Landlord under this Lease shall be cumulative and shall not be exclusive of any other rights and remedies provided to Landlord under applicable law. (b) Landlord, in its sole discretion, may terminate Tenant's right of possession (but not this Lease) and may re-enter and repossess the Property without demand or notice of any kind to Tenant and without terminating this Lease, in which event Landlord may, but shall be under no obligation to do so, relet the same for the account of Tenant for such rent and upon such terms as shall be satisfactory to Landlord. For the purpose of such reletting, Landlord is authorized to restore the Property to building standards, and (i) if Landlord shall fail or refuse to relet the Property, or (ii) if the same are relet and a sufficient sum shall not be realized from such reletting after paying the unpaid Gross Rental due hereunder earned but unpaid at the time of reletting plus interest thereon from due date, the cost of recovering possession and all of the costs and expenses of decorations, repairs, changes, alterations and additions by Landlord and the expense of such reletting and of the collection of the rent accruing therefrom, to satisfy the rent provided for in this Lease to be paid, then Tenant shall pay to Landlord as damages a sum equal to the amount of the rent reserved in this Lease for such period or periods, or if the Property has been relet, Tenant shall satisfy and pay any such deficiency upon demand therefore from time to time and Tenant agrees that Landlord may file suit to recover any sums falling due under the terms of this Section from time to time on one or more occasions without Landlord being obligated to wait until expiration of the term of this Lease; such reletting shall not be construed as an election of the part of Landlord to terminate this Lease unless a written notice of such intention be given to Tenant by Landlord. Notwithstanding any such reletting without termination Landlord may at any time thereafter elect to terminate this Lease for such previous breach. (c ) Landlord shall have a statutory lien upon all of the personal property located in the Premises, and may deny access to any such personal property pursuant to the provisions of the “Minnesota Liens on Personal Property in Self-Storage Act” Minn. Stat. Sections 514.970 – 514.979 (the “Self-Storage Lien Act”), and also enforce the statutory lien pursuant to the Self-Storage Lien Act. Failure of Landlord to declare any default immediately upon occurrence thereof, or delay in taking any action in connection therewith, shall not waive such default, but Landlord shall have the right to declare any such default at any time thereafter. If Tenant defaults in the observance or performance of any Tenant's covenants, agreement or obligations hereunder wherein the default can be cured by the expenditure of money, Landlord may, but without obligation, and without limiting any other remedies which it may have by reason of such default, cure the default, charge the costs thereof to Tenant, and Tenant shall pay the same as additional rent forthwith upon demand, together with interest thereon. 29. Hold Harmless/Waiver of Subrogation. Tenant shall indemnify Landlord from and against any and all demands and liabilities arising from or relating to injury or loss of life to persons or arising from Tenant's negligence or intentional misconduct in the use of the Property and the conduct of 14 Tenant's agents and invitees in or around the Premises, Building and the Property. Landlord shall indemnify Tenant from and against any and all demands and liabilities for or relating to injury or loss of life to persons or damage to or loss of property to the extent arising from Landlord's negligence or willful misconduct in and around that portion of the Building other than the Premises. In the event of an act or occurrence in which both Landlord and Tenant are attributed some degree of fault, the parties' respective rights to contribution and indemnity shall be as generally provided at law or in equity. The duty to indemnify contemplated hereby includes the duty to pay all reasonable and necessary attorneys' fees and costs incurred by the indemnitee in connection with any such proceedings. To the extent possible, Landlord and Tenant release one another, and their respective shareholders, members, partners, officers, directors, governors, director, employees, and agents, from all liability to the other, or anyone claiming through them by way of subrogation or otherwise, for any loss or damage covered by property insurance, or coverable by a customary policy of insurance required by this Lease, even if such loss or damage was caused by the fault or negligence of the other party, or anyone for whom such party may be responsible. 30. Severability. If any term or provision of this Lease, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall to any extent by invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Lease, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each provision of this Lease shall be valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. 31. Waiver of Covenants. Failure of Landlord to insist in any one or more instances upon strict performance of any term, covenant or condition of this Lease or to exercise any remedy or option herein contained, shall not be construed as a waiver or a relinquishment for the future of such term, convenient, condition, remedy or option, but the same shall continue and remain in full force and effect. The receipt by Landlord of rents with knowledge of a breach in any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Lease to be kept and performed by Tenant shall not be deemed a waiver of such breach, and Landlord shall not be deemed to have waived any provision of this Lease until expressed in writing and signed by Landlord. 32. Notices. All notices, demands consents and approvals which may or are required to be given by either party to the other hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been fully given when deposited in the United States mail by “verified mail” to the addresses of the Party set forth below. The term “verified mail” is defined the Self-Storage Lien Act as any method of mailing that is offered by the United States Postal Service or private delivery service that provides evidence of mailing. Landlord: Tenant: 15 The above address may be changed by a party on at least fifteen (15) days' notice to the other party. The Self-Storage Lien Act requires that the Tenant be allowed to provide an alternate contact person for the purposes of providing notice(s) of default under Minn. Stat. Section 514.973. That alternate contact person is: Tenant’s Alternate Contact Person: If the Tenant declines to name an Alternate Contact Person, the Tenant MUST initial the statement below: Tenant hereby confirms that Tenant declines to provide an alternate contact. ______________. Tenant’s Initials 33. Miscellaneous. (a) No rights to light or air over any property, whether belonging to Landlord or any other person, are granted to Tenant by this Lease. (b) This Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Landlord its successors and assigns, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Tenant, and, to the extent assignment may be approved by Landlord hereunder, Tenant's successors or assigns. (c) All rights and remedies of Landlord under this Lease shall be cumulative and none shall exclude any other rights or remedies allowed by law; and this Lease is declared to be a Minnesota contract, and all of the terms hereof shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. (d) The captions in this Lease are for convenience only and are not part of this Lease. (e) This Lease may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. (f) The exhibit(s) attached to this Lease are hereby made a part of this Lease. Landlord and Tenant respectively, have duly signed this Lease as of the day and year first above written. (34) Military Service. Tenant hereby discloses and confirms, by initialing below, whether or not Tenant is, or is not, a member of the uniformed services as the term is defined in United States Code, title 10, section 101(a)(5), or a member of the National Guard or a reserve component under United States Code, title 32, section 101. Tenant is such a member _________ Tenant is not such a member _________ 16 (35) Statutory Disclosures. a. The name and address of the person authorized to manage the Property and Premises is: Name: Address: b. The name and address of the owner of the Property, or an agent authorized to by the owner to accept service of process, and give receipt for notices and demands is: Name: Address: [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 17 Landlord: ________________ Tenant: ______________________________ By_______________________________ By:________________________________ Craig Scherber Its: Chief Manager Its: ____________________ The undersigned personally guaranties performance of Tenant’s obligations under the terms of this Lease, and confirms that the Landlord will not enter into the Lease without this personal guaranty and that there is adequate consideration for this personal guaranty. ____________________________________ Date: ______________________ Standard Lease - Rockford Rentals.v 8.31.21-1 18 EXHIBIT A To Lease Dated ____________________ _______________________________, as Landlord And ______________________, as Tenant Depiction of Premises 19 EXHIBIT B To Lease Dated _________________________________, as Landlord _______________________________, as Tenant Tenant Improvements 1 Scott Dahlke @ CESD From:Sherman, Tod (DOT) <tod.sherman@state.mn.us> Sent:Monday, December 14, 2020 8:13 AM To:Scott Dahlke @ CESD Cc:Muhic, P Cameron (DOT) Subject:RE: 22410 State Hwy No 55, Corcoran -- potential project Attachments:Local Government Guide December April 2018.pdf Hi Scott: Thank you for the question. As discussed with Craig, the warrants for both a right turn lane and a left turn lane are met if the driveway is expected to serve 100 trips per day. Therefore, for example, if a development is expected to attract 50 customers per day, this would equate to 50 trips into the development and 50 trips out of the development for a total of 100 trips. I don’t anticipate that the other criteria will apply in this case, but the full list of criteria is located at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html on the last two pages of Chapter 3. Attached is our Local Government Guide which outlines our development review process and the information that we would like to have for our reviews. Our formal reviews are usually conducted at the same time the City reviews the plans. Do you have a timeframe for when the plans will be submitted to the City? Tod Sherman Planning Director Office of Planning, Program Management and Transit 1500 West County Road B‐2 Roseville, MN 55113 651‐234‐7794 Tod.sherman@state.mn.us From: Scott Dahlke @ CESD <sdahlke@civilesd.com> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 1:49 PM To: Sherman, Tod (DOT) <tod.sherman@state.mn.us> Subject: 22410 State Hwy No 55, Corcoran ‐‐ potential project Hi Tod, I am working on a potential project at 22410 State Hwy 55, Corcoran. Owner Craig Scherber has indicated he reached out to you a number of weeks back and discussed access. There are currently 2 driveways and we would be proposing to remove 1 of them with this project. The project is proposed to be multi‐tenant large unit garage/storage. Owner Craig Scherber has 3 other locations for these structures in the metro are and typical tenants are very low volume traffic This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. 2 generators. Traffic generation at the site is estimated to average 10 cars per day. Attached is a concept plan of the proposed project for reference. We have been asked to obtain clarification of what would trigger a turn lane on Hwy 55. Could you forward criteria and/or thresholds that would trigger a turn lane. And if a turn lane were required, what configuration would be required? Give me a call or email with any questions. Thanks, Scott Dahlke Civil Engineering Site Design, LLC PO Box 566 118 E. Broadway St. Monticello, MN 55362 763‐314‐0929 office 612‐619‐8625 cell sdahlke@civilesd.com PROJECT LOCATIONSITEMINNESOTA GARAGES TOO CORCORAN SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN CITY OF CORCORAN, MNHENNEPIN COUNTY SIT E SITE SITE C0State High w a y N o . 5 5 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC Hors e s h o e B e n d D r .Private Drive PROJECT LOCATION SURVEY DATA EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS LEGEND: SITE PLAN NOTES C1 SITE DATA: GENERAL NOTES SETBACKS: KEY NOTES: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FILTRATIONBASIN100 YR=1035.5BOTTOM=1031.5 PRETREATMENTBASIN100 YR=1035.5NWL=1032.0 C2 LEGEND: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA FILTRATION BASIN100 YR=1035.5BOTTOM=1031.5 PRETREATMENTBASIN100 YR=1035.5NWL=1032.0 C3 LEGEND: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA C4 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA LEGEND: SEE SITE DEVELOPMENTPLANS C1, C2 & C3 SURVEY DATA PROJECT LOCATION EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION C5.1 EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULE EROSION CONTROL NOTESEROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE VEGETATION GROUND COVER SCHEDULE SWPP NARRATIVE POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES RESPONSIBLE PARTY DESIGN CALCULATIONS SWPPP Designer: Owner: Garages Too, LLC Contractor: Manager: EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES: TOTAL SITE DATA: LEGEND: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC FILTRATION BASIN NOTES MATCH LINE "A" MATCH LINE "B" C5.2 LEGEND: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA PROJECT LOCATION EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MATCH LINE "A" MATCH LINE "B" H O R S E S H O E B E N D D R I V E C6.1 LEGEND: DEMOLITION NOTES INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MATCH LINE C6.2 LEGEND: DEMOLITION NOTES INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MATCH LINE CONCRETE PAVEMENT - LIGHT DUTY (PRIVATE SIDEWALK)BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE PAVEMENT - HEAVY DUTYINDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave.Tonka Bay, MN 55331Craig Scherber612-810-8400GARAGESTOO, LLCCONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave.Tonka Bay, MN 55331Craig Scherber612-810-8400GARAGESTOO, LLC POND OUTLET CONTROLSTRUCTURE OCS-1FILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES:CLAY LINER CRITERIA (Per MPCA Gudelines)xxxxxxx NOT TO SCALE C8 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project 22400 State Highway No. 55 Corcoran, MN DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Prepared for: Garages Too, LLC Attn: Mr. Craig Scherber 305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Phone: (612) 612-810-8400 Prepared by: Civil Engineering Site Design Attn: Scott Dahlke PO Box 566 118 East Broadway Street Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: (763) 314-0929 sdahlke@civilesd.com April 20, 2021 Revised 06/16/2021 Revised 09/07/2021 CESD Project # 00796 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN Drainage Analysis Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Narrative - Proposed Project - Site Location - Requirements - Existing Site Conditions - Proposed Site Conditions - Soils Data - Calculations - Summary - Certification Appendix A - Existing Conditions Analysis - DA 1 – Existing Conditions Drainage Area Plan - 2 yr Rainfall Event HydroCAD Calculation - 10 yr Rainfall Event HydroCAD Calculation - 100 yr Rainfall Event HydroCAD Calculation Appendix B - Proposed Conditions Analysis - DA 2 – Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Plan - 2 yr Rainfall Event HydroCAD Calculation - 10 yr Rainfall Event HydroCAD Calculation - 100 yr Rainfall Event HydroCAD Calculation Appendix C – Soils Data - Soils Data per Web Soil Survey Appendix D – Basin Volume Worksheet - Filtration Worksheet Garages Too, Corcoran, MN Drainage Analysis Page 3 NARRATIVE PROPOSED PROJECT: The project proposes building and site improvements for a self-storage facility consisting of multiple buildings with exterior access to all storage units. Site improvements include new buildings, pavement, utilities, a stormwater management basin, and associated site improvements. The project proposes to collect the surface storm water runoff for the project site and convey storm water to a proposed storm water management filtration basin in the northeast part of the property. SITE LOCATION: The site is located at 22400 State Highway No. 55, northerly of State Highway 55, easterly of Pioneer Trail, and westerly of Rolling Hills Road in Corcoran, MN. The project is in the SE 1/4 of SE 1/4, Section 32, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, MN. Access to the site can be achieved by the private drive from State Highway 55. REQUIREMENTS: Stormwater management design for the project is subject to review by the City of Corcoran, MN. The significant requirements are water quality treatment in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The attached storm water runoff and ponding calculations are based on the Soil Conservation Service Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method incorporated into the software program HydroCad 10.00. Calculations use NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall depths and NRCS MSE 3 rainfall distribution. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: The existing site is a 5.04 acre farmstead zoned Urban Reserve. Agricultural land abuts the site to the west, existing residential to the north and east, and a business firm to the south. Drainage for the existing property is by surface drainage. Drainage flows from the west and south lot lines to the north and east lot lines of the parcel. Drainage continues overland off-site to the north where it collects in a low area southwest of Horseshoe Bend Drive. The parcel is accessed by a 10 to 12 foot wide driveway that begins at Highway 55. Existing topography elevation change of the drainage area ranges from minimal to significant with surface slopes from less than 1% to 20%. Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map DA 1 and associated HydroCAD calculation model printouts for the existing condition can be found in attached Appendix A Garages Too, Corcoran, MN Drainage Analysis Page 4 PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS: The development project will result in the construction of four self-storage buildings. A storm water filtration basin is proposed in the northeast portion of the site which will outlet with a 15” RCP apron and riprap toward the adjacent property lot line that drains off-site to the north where it collects in a low area southwest of Horseshoe Bend Drive. There will be no alteration of the existing drainage conveyance pattern to the existing low area. The access driveway will be widened to 24 feet. Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map DA 2 and associated HydroCAD calculation model printouts can be found in attached Appendix B. SOILS DATA: Based on Web Soil Survey data, soils in the project area are understood to be Hydrologic Group D. Soils data for the site can be found in attached Appendix C. CALCULATIONS: Calculations have been generated using HydroCAD 10.00 for runoff rate analysis based on Atlas 14 rainfall data (modified by city standards herein) and MSE rainfall distribution. Refer to attachments of Exhibit A and Exhibit B for drainage area plans and hydrographs for the 2-year (2.86”) storm event, 10-year (4.26”) storm event, and 100-year (7.32”) storm event. Individual subcatchment areas have been identified and runoff rates have been calculated in the HydroCAD model. A storm water management basin is proposed. The basin size and volume capacity has been designed to mitigate the increased storm water runoff from the project site improvements. The site runoff rates are then tabulated for both the existing condition and proposed condition. Results indicate the proposed condition runoff rates are less than existing condition runoff rates. The following table summarizes the calculation model results for comparison of storm water runoff rate of existing conditions to proposed conditions: CALCULATION SUMMARY Item Subcatchment Area 2 yr (2.86”) Runoff Rate (cfs) 10 yr (4.26”) Runoff Rate (cfs) 100 yr (7.32”) Runoff Rate (cfs) Existing Condition Total Site 2R Area=18.74 Ac. 26.92 51.92 110.58 Proposed Condition Total Site 2R Area=18.74 Ac. 26.41 47.89 103.91 BASIN VOLUME CALCULATION: Calculation of the basin water quality volume is to conform with MPCA General Construction Permit requirements. The required water quality volume is equal to one point one inch (1.1”) of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. Pretreatment of the storm water before entering the filtration basin is provided by sump manholes and pretreatment basin before entering the filtration basin. Garages Too, Corcoran, MN Drainage Analysis Page 5 The impervious surface and basin volume calculations are provided in attached Appendix D. The following table summarizes the calculations: Item New Impervious Surface Area (sf) 1.1” Runoff Volume Required (cf) 48 hr Discharge Capacity (cf) Basin Storage Provided (cf) Basin 1P 140,980 12,923 31,752 14,474 SUMMARY: The project improvements and drainage analysis propose to satisfy the City of Corcoran requirements for storm water management. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 9/7/2021 ______________________ ______________ Scott Dahlke, P.E. Date Reg. No. 24348 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN Drainage Analysis APPENDIX A Existing Conditions Drainage Calculations DRAINAGE AREA 1S = 5.97 AC DRAINAGE AREA 2S = 12.77 AC DA1 LEGEND: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA 1S To Off-site - Horseshoe Bend Drive 2S To Off-site - Highway 55 2R Total Area Runoff Routing Diagram for 00796 Ex Prepared by CESD, Printed 9/6/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link Existing Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"00796 Ex Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 2HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 12001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=Gamma-400, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=259,810 sf 6.09% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.24"Subcatchment 1S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Flow Length=670' Tc=15.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=8.52 cfs 26,768 cf Runoff Area=556,370 sf 9.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.28"Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway 55 Flow Length=910' Tc=15.6 min CN=80/98 Runoff=18.40 cfs 59,467 cf Inflow=26.92 cfs 86,235 cfReach 2R: Total Area Runoff Outflow=26.92 cfs 86,235 cf Total Runoff Area = 816,180 sf Runoff Volume = 86,235 cf Average Runoff Depth = 1.27" 91.78% Pervious = 749,100 sf 8.22% Impervious = 67,080 sf Existing Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"00796 Ex Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 3HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Bend Drive Runoff = 8.52 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 26,768 cf, Depth= 1.24" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=Gamma-400, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 243,980 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 6,630 98 Roofs, HSG D 9,200 98 Paved parking, HSG D 259,810 81 Weighted Average 243,980 80 93.91% Pervious Area 15,830 98 6.09% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.7 100 0.0600 0.25 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 6.0 570 0.0510 1.58 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 12.7 670 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 15.0 min Summary for Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway 55 Runoff = 18.40 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 59,467 cf, Depth= 1.28" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=Gamma-400, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 505,120 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 26,070 98 Roofs, HSG D * 11,650 98 Paved driveway, HSG D * 13,530 98 Paved road, HSG D 556,370 82 Weighted Average 505,120 80 90.79% Pervious Area 51,250 98 9.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.9 100 0.0400 0.21 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 7.7 810 0.0620 1.74 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 15.6 910 Total Existing Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"00796 Ex Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 4HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: Total Area Runoff Inflow Area = 816,180 sf, 8.22% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.27" for 2-Year event Inflow = 26.92 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 86,235 cf Outflow = 26.92 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 86,235 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"00796 Ex Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 5HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 12001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=Gamma-400, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=259,810 sf 6.09% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.37"Subcatchment 1S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Flow Length=670' Tc=15.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=16.58 cfs 51,226 cf Runoff Area=556,370 sf 9.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.42"Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway 55 Flow Length=910' Tc=15.6 min CN=80/98 Runoff=35.34 cfs 112,252 cf Inflow=51.92 cfs 163,478 cfReach 2R: Total Area Runoff Outflow=51.92 cfs 163,478 cf Total Runoff Area = 816,180 sf Runoff Volume = 163,478 cf Average Runoff Depth = 2.40" 91.78% Pervious = 749,100 sf 8.22% Impervious = 67,080 sf Existing Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"00796 Ex Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 6HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Bend Drive Runoff = 16.58 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 51,226 cf, Depth= 2.37" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=Gamma-400, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 243,980 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 6,630 98 Roofs, HSG D 9,200 98 Paved parking, HSG D 259,810 81 Weighted Average 243,980 80 93.91% Pervious Area 15,830 98 6.09% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.7 100 0.0600 0.25 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 6.0 570 0.0510 1.58 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 12.7 670 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 15.0 min Summary for Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway 55 Runoff = 35.34 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 112,252 cf, Depth= 2.42" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=Gamma-400, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 505,120 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 26,070 98 Roofs, HSG D * 11,650 98 Paved driveway, HSG D * 13,530 98 Paved road, HSG D 556,370 82 Weighted Average 505,120 80 90.79% Pervious Area 51,250 98 9.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.9 100 0.0400 0.21 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 7.7 810 0.0620 1.74 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 15.6 910 Total Existing Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"00796 Ex Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: Total Area Runoff Inflow Area = 816,180 sf, 8.22% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.40" for 10-Year event Inflow = 51.92 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 163,478 cf Outflow = 51.92 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 163,478 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"00796 Ex Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 12001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=Gamma-400, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=259,810 sf 6.09% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.12"Subcatchment 1S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Flow Length=670' Tc=15.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=35.56 cfs 110,808 cf Runoff Area=556,370 sf 9.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.18"Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway 55 Flow Length=910' Tc=15.6 min CN=80/98 Runoff=75.06 cfs 240,311 cf Inflow=110.58 cfs 351,119 cfReach 2R: Total Area Runoff Outflow=110.58 cfs 351,119 cf Total Runoff Area = 816,180 sf Runoff Volume = 351,119 cf Average Runoff Depth = 5.16" 91.78% Pervious = 749,100 sf 8.22% Impervious = 67,080 sf Existing Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"00796 Ex Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Bend Drive Runoff = 35.56 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 110,808 cf, Depth= 5.12" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=Gamma-400, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 243,980 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 6,630 98 Roofs, HSG D 9,200 98 Paved parking, HSG D 259,810 81 Weighted Average 243,980 80 93.91% Pervious Area 15,830 98 6.09% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.7 100 0.0600 0.25 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 6.0 570 0.0510 1.58 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 12.7 670 Total, Increased to minimum Tc = 15.0 min Summary for Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway 55 Runoff = 75.06 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 240,311 cf, Depth= 5.18" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=Gamma-400, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 505,120 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 26,070 98 Roofs, HSG D * 11,650 98 Paved driveway, HSG D * 13,530 98 Paved road, HSG D 556,370 82 Weighted Average 505,120 80 90.79% Pervious Area 51,250 98 9.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.9 100 0.0400 0.21 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 7.7 810 0.0620 1.74 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 15.6 910 Total Existing Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"00796 Ex Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: Total Area Runoff Inflow Area = 816,180 sf, 8.22% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.16" for 100-Year event Inflow = 110.58 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 351,119 cf Outflow = 110.58 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 351,119 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Garages Too, Corcoran, MN Drainage Analysis APPENDIX B Proposed Conditions Drainage Calculations DRAINAGE AREA 11S = 3.99 AC DRAINAGE AREA 12S = 1.03 AC DRAINAGE AREA 13S = 0.95 AC BASIN 1P DRAINAGE AREA 2S = 12.77 AC DA2 LEGEND: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA 2S To Off-site - Highway 55 11S Sewer To Basin 12S Basin Area 13S To Off-site - Horseshoe Bend Drive 1R Site Runoff to Horseshoe Bend Drive 2R Total Disturbed Area Runoff 1P Basin Routing Diagram for 00796 Pro Prepared by CESD, Printed 9/6/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 2HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 12001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=556,370 sf 11.13% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.31"Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway Flow Length=910' Tc=15.6 min CN=80/98 Runoff=20.60 cfs 60,787 cf Runoff Area=173,680 sf 67.18% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.14"Subcatchment 11S: Sewer To Basin Flow Length=700' Tc=9.9 min CN=80/98 Runoff=12.06 cfs 31,004 cf Runoff Area=44,780 sf 29.72% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.77"Subcatchment 12S: Basin Area Tc=7.0 min CN=84/98 Runoff=3.04 cfs 6,592 cf Runoff Area=41,350 sf 2.85% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.19"Subcatchment 13S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Tc=7.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=1.99 cfs 4,095 cf Inflow=5.89 cfs 31,661 cfReach 1R: Site Runoff to Horseshoe Bend Drive Outflow=5.89 cfs 31,661 cf Inflow=26.41 cfs 92,447 cfReach 2R: Total Disturbed Area Runoff Outflow=26.41 cfs 92,447 cf Peak Elev=1,033.73' Storage=21,285 cf Inflow=14.90 cfs 37,596 cfPond 1P: Basin Outflow=5.06 cfs 27,566 cf Total Runoff Area = 816,180 sf Runoff Volume = 102,477 cf Average Runoff Depth = 1.51" 76.34% Pervious = 623,090 sf 23.66% Impervious = 193,090 sf Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 3HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway 55 Runoff = 20.60 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 60,787 cf, Depth= 1.31" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 494,440 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 26,070 98 Roofs, HSG D * 22,330 98 Paved driveway, HSG D * 13,530 98 Paved road, HSG D 556,370 82 Weighted Average 494,440 80 88.87% Pervious Area 61,930 98 11.13% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.9 100 0.0400 0.21 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 7.7 810 0.0620 1.74 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 15.6 910 Total Summary for Subcatchment 11S: Sewer To Basin Runoff = 12.06 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 31,004 cf, Depth= 2.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 57,010 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 48,810 98 Roofs, HSG D 67,860 98 Paved parking, HSG D 173,680 92 Weighted Average 57,010 80 32.82% Pervious Area 116,670 98 67.18% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.7 100 0.0600 0.25 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 0.2 70 0.1500 5.81 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 2.5 320 0.0110 2.13 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.5 210 0.0150 6.45 7.91 Pipe Channel, 15.0" Round Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 4HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 9.9 700 Total Summary for Subcatchment 12S: Basin Area Runoff = 3.04 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 6,592 cf, Depth= 1.77" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 23,860 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 13,310 98 Roofs, HSG D 7,610 98 Water Surface, 0% imp, HSG D 44,780 88 Weighted Average 31,470 84 70.28% Pervious Area 13,310 98 29.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 13S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Bend Drive Runoff = 1.99 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 4,095 cf, Depth= 1.19" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 40,170 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1,180 98 Paved parking, HSG D 41,350 81 Weighted Average 40,170 80 97.15% Pervious Area 1,180 98 2.85% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 1R: Site Runoff to Horseshoe Bend Drive Inflow Area = 259,810 sf, 50.48% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.46" for 2-Year event Inflow = 5.89 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 31,661 cf Outflow = 5.89 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 31,661 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 5HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: Total Disturbed Area Runoff Inflow Area = 816,180 sf, 23.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.36" for 2-Year event Inflow = 26.41 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 92,447 cf Outflow = 26.41 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 92,447 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1P: Basin Inflow Area = 218,460 sf, 59.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.07" for 2-Year event Inflow = 14.90 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 37,596 cf Outflow = 5.06 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 27,566 cf, Atten= 66%, Lag= 12.8 min Primary = 5.06 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 27,566 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 1,032.00' Surf.Area= 9,010 sf Storage= 2,608 cf Peak Elev= 1,033.73' @ 12.38 hrs Surf.Area= 12,531 sf Storage= 21,285 cf (18,677 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 171.1 min calculated for 24,956 cf (66% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 83.3 min ( 854.9 - 771.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 1,031.50' 55,968 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 1,031.50 4,870 0 0 1,031.99 5,480 2,536 2,536 1,032.00 9,010 72 2,608 1,033.00 11,050 10,030 12,638 1,034.00 13,070 12,060 24,698 1,036.00 18,200 31,270 55,968 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 1,026.25'15.0" Round Culvert L= 75.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 1,026.25' / 1,016.20' S= 0.1340 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Device 1 1,033.00'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #3 Device 2 1,032.00'15.0" Round Culvert L= 11.0' RCP, end-section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 1,031.50' / 1,032.00' S= -0.0455 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #4 Device 1 1,034.50'Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 3.10 (C= 3.88) Head (feet) 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.19 0.38 0.75 Width (feet) 0.00 1.39 1.94 2.65 3.46 4.00 4.00 #5 Device 1 1,035.25'48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #6 Primary 1,035.50'10.0' long x 8.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 6HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.43 2.54 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 Primary OutFlow Max=5.06 cfs @ 12.38 hrs HW=1,033.73' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Culvert (Passes 5.06 cfs of 15.47 cfs potential flow) 2=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir (Passes 5.06 cfs of 7.91 cfs potential flow) 3=Culvert (Inlet Controls 5.06 cfs @ 4.12 fps) 4=Custom Weir/Orifice ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 5=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 12001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=556,370 sf 11.13% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.45"Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway Flow Length=910' Tc=15.6 min CN=80/98 Runoff=39.08 cfs 113,824 cf Runoff Area=173,680 sf 67.18% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.44"Subcatchment 11S: Sewer To Basin Flow Length=700' Tc=9.9 min CN=80/98 Runoff=19.26 cfs 49,858 cf Runoff Area=44,780 sf 29.72% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.02"Subcatchment 12S: Basin Area Tc=7.0 min CN=84/98 Runoff=5.16 cfs 11,286 cf Runoff Area=41,350 sf 2.85% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.31"Subcatchment 13S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Tc=7.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=3.87 cfs 7,956 cf Inflow=9.63 cfs 59,070 cfReach 1R: Site Runoff to Horseshoe Bend Drive Outflow=9.63 cfs 59,070 cf Inflow=47.89 cfs 172,893 cfReach 2R: Total Disturbed Area Runoff Outflow=47.89 cfs 172,893 cf Peak Elev=1,034.48' Storage=31,233 cf Inflow=24.07 cfs 61,144 cfPond 1P: Basin Outflow=7.18 cfs 51,114 cf Total Runoff Area = 816,180 sf Runoff Volume = 182,923 cf Average Runoff Depth = 2.69" 76.34% Pervious = 623,090 sf 23.66% Impervious = 193,090 sf Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway 55 Runoff = 39.08 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 113,824 cf, Depth= 2.45" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 494,440 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 26,070 98 Roofs, HSG D * 22,330 98 Paved driveway, HSG D * 13,530 98 Paved road, HSG D 556,370 82 Weighted Average 494,440 80 88.87% Pervious Area 61,930 98 11.13% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.9 100 0.0400 0.21 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 7.7 810 0.0620 1.74 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 15.6 910 Total Summary for Subcatchment 11S: Sewer To Basin Runoff = 19.26 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 49,858 cf, Depth= 3.44" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 57,010 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 48,810 98 Roofs, HSG D 67,860 98 Paved parking, HSG D 173,680 92 Weighted Average 57,010 80 32.82% Pervious Area 116,670 98 67.18% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.7 100 0.0600 0.25 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 0.2 70 0.1500 5.81 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 2.5 320 0.0110 2.13 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.5 210 0.0150 6.45 7.91 Pipe Channel, 15.0" Round Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 9.9 700 Total Summary for Subcatchment 12S: Basin Area Runoff = 5.16 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 11,286 cf, Depth= 3.02" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 23,860 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 13,310 98 Roofs, HSG D 7,610 98 Water Surface, 0% imp, HSG D 44,780 88 Weighted Average 31,470 84 70.28% Pervious Area 13,310 98 29.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 13S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Bend Drive Runoff = 3.87 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 7,956 cf, Depth= 2.31" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 40,170 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1,180 98 Paved parking, HSG D 41,350 81 Weighted Average 40,170 80 97.15% Pervious Area 1,180 98 2.85% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 1R: Site Runoff to Horseshoe Bend Drive Inflow Area = 259,810 sf, 50.48% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.73" for 10-Year event Inflow = 9.63 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 59,070 cf Outflow = 9.63 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 59,070 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: Total Disturbed Area Runoff Inflow Area = 816,180 sf, 23.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.54" for 10-Year event Inflow = 47.89 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 172,893 cf Outflow = 47.89 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 172,893 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1P: Basin Inflow Area = 218,460 sf, 59.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.36" for 10-Year event Inflow = 24.07 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 61,144 cf Outflow = 7.18 cfs @ 12.40 hrs, Volume= 51,114 cf, Atten= 70%, Lag= 14.4 min Primary = 7.18 cfs @ 12.40 hrs, Volume= 51,114 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 1,032.00' Surf.Area= 9,010 sf Storage= 2,608 cf Peak Elev= 1,034.48' @ 12.40 hrs Surf.Area= 14,295 sf Storage= 31,233 cf (28,625 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 142.2 min calculated for 48,502 cf (79% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 74.0 min ( 840.0 - 766.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 1,031.50' 55,968 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 1,031.50 4,870 0 0 1,031.99 5,480 2,536 2,536 1,032.00 9,010 72 2,608 1,033.00 11,050 10,030 12,638 1,034.00 13,070 12,060 24,698 1,036.00 18,200 31,270 55,968 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 1,026.25'15.0" Round Culvert L= 75.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 1,026.25' / 1,016.20' S= 0.1340 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Device 1 1,033.00'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #3 Device 2 1,032.00'15.0" Round Culvert L= 11.0' RCP, end-section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 1,031.50' / 1,032.00' S= -0.0455 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #4 Device 1 1,034.50'Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 3.10 (C= 3.88) Head (feet) 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.19 0.38 0.75 Width (feet) 0.00 1.39 1.94 2.65 3.46 4.00 4.00 #5 Device 1 1,035.25'48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #6 Primary 1,035.50'10.0' long x 8.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 11HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.43 2.54 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 Primary OutFlow Max=7.18 cfs @ 12.40 hrs HW=1,034.48' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Culvert (Passes 7.18 cfs of 16.29 cfs potential flow) 2=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir (Passes 7.18 cfs of 21.76 cfs potential flow) 3=Culvert (Inlet Controls 7.18 cfs @ 5.85 fps) 4=Custom Weir/Orifice ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 5=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 12HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-120.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 12001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=556,370 sf 11.13% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.22"Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway Flow Length=910' Tc=15.6 min CN=80/98 Runoff=82.24 cfs 242,172 cf Runoff Area=173,680 sf 67.18% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.39"Subcatchment 11S: Sewer To Basin Flow Length=700' Tc=9.9 min CN=80/98 Runoff=35.28 cfs 92,551 cf Runoff Area=44,780 sf 29.72% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.93"Subcatchment 12S: Basin Area Tc=7.0 min CN=84/98 Runoff=9.88 cfs 22,132 cf Runoff Area=41,350 sf 2.85% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.05"Subcatchment 13S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Tc=7.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=8.24 cfs 17,402 cf Inflow=22.50 cfs 122,056 cfReach 1R: Site Runoff to Horseshoe Bend Drive Outflow=22.50 cfs 122,056 cf Inflow=103.91 cfs 364,227 cfReach 2R: Total Disturbed Area Runoff Outflow=103.91 cfs 364,227 cf Peak Elev=1,035.49' Storage=47,071 cf Inflow=44.48 cfs 114,683 cfPond 1P: Basin Outflow=17.35 cfs 104,653 cf Total Runoff Area = 816,180 sf Runoff Volume = 374,257 cf Average Runoff Depth = 5.50" 76.34% Pervious = 623,090 sf 23.66% Impervious = 193,090 sf Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 13HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: To Off-site - Highway 55 Runoff = 82.24 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 242,172 cf, Depth= 5.22" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 494,440 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 26,070 98 Roofs, HSG D * 22,330 98 Paved driveway, HSG D * 13,530 98 Paved road, HSG D 556,370 82 Weighted Average 494,440 80 88.87% Pervious Area 61,930 98 11.13% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.9 100 0.0400 0.21 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 7.7 810 0.0620 1.74 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 15.6 910 Total Summary for Subcatchment 11S: Sewer To Basin Runoff = 35.28 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 92,551 cf, Depth= 6.39" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 57,010 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 48,810 98 Roofs, HSG D 67,860 98 Paved parking, HSG D 173,680 92 Weighted Average 57,010 80 32.82% Pervious Area 116,670 98 67.18% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.7 100 0.0600 0.25 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.80" 0.2 70 0.1500 5.81 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 2.5 320 0.0110 2.13 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.5 210 0.0150 6.45 7.91 Pipe Channel, 15.0" Round Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 14HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 9.9 700 Total Summary for Subcatchment 12S: Basin Area Runoff = 9.88 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 22,132 cf, Depth= 5.93" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 23,860 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 13,310 98 Roofs, HSG D 7,610 98 Water Surface, 0% imp, HSG D 44,780 88 Weighted Average 31,470 84 70.28% Pervious Area 13,310 98 29.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 13S: To Off-site - Horseshoe Bend Drive Runoff = 8.24 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 17,402 cf, Depth= 5.05" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 40,170 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1,180 98 Paved parking, HSG D 41,350 81 Weighted Average 40,170 80 97.15% Pervious Area 1,180 98 2.85% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 1R: Site Runoff to Horseshoe Bend Drive Inflow Area = 259,810 sf, 50.48% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.64" for 100-Year event Inflow = 22.50 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 122,056 cf Outflow = 22.50 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 122,056 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 15HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: Total Disturbed Area Runoff Inflow Area = 816,180 sf, 23.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.36" for 100-Year event Inflow = 103.91 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 364,227 cf Outflow = 103.91 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 364,227 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1P: Basin Inflow Area = 218,460 sf, 59.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.30" for 100-Year event Inflow = 44.48 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 114,683 cf Outflow = 17.35 cfs @ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 104,653 cf, Atten= 61%, Lag= 10.7 min Primary = 17.35 cfs @ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 104,653 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-120.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 1,032.00' Surf.Area= 9,010 sf Storage= 2,608 cf Peak Elev= 1,035.49' @ 12.34 hrs Surf.Area= 16,900 sf Storage= 47,071 cf (44,463 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 111.8 min calculated for 102,045 cf (89% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 62.7 min ( 821.4 - 758.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 1,031.50' 55,968 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 1,031.50 4,870 0 0 1,031.99 5,480 2,536 2,536 1,032.00 9,010 72 2,608 1,033.00 11,050 10,030 12,638 1,034.00 13,070 12,060 24,698 1,036.00 18,200 31,270 55,968 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 1,026.25'15.0" Round Culvert L= 75.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 1,026.25' / 1,016.20' S= 0.1340 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Device 1 1,033.00'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #3 Device 2 1,032.00'15.0" Round Culvert L= 11.0' RCP, end-section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 1,031.50' / 1,032.00' S= -0.0455 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #4 Device 1 1,034.50'Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 3.10 (C= 3.88) Head (feet) 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.19 0.38 0.75 Width (feet) 0.00 1.39 1.94 2.65 3.46 4.00 4.00 #5 Device 1 1,035.25'48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #6 Primary 1,035.50'10.0' long x 8.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 Proposed Drainage Condition MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"00796 Pro Printed 9/6/2021Prepared by CESD Page 16HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 01607 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.43 2.54 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 Primary OutFlow Max=17.35 cfs @ 12.34 hrs HW=1,035.49' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 17.35 cfs @ 14.14 fps) 2=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir (Passes < 45.07 cfs potential flow) 3=Culvert (Passes < 9.33 cfs potential flow) 4=Custom Weir/Orifice (Passes < 11.55 cfs potential flow) 5=Orifice/Grate (Passes < 4.92 cfs potential flow) 6=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Garages Too, Corcoran, MN Drainage Analysis APPENDIX C Soils Data Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2020 Page 1 of 349906004990630499066049906904990720499075049907804990600499063049906604990690499072049907504990780451950451980452010452040452070452100452130452160452190452220 451950 451980 452010 452040 452070 452100 452130 452160 452190 452220 45° 4' 7'' N 93° 36' 37'' W45° 4' 7'' N93° 36' 24'' W45° 4' 2'' N 93° 36' 37'' W45° 4' 2'' N 93° 36' 24'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 15 30 60 90 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,300 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 5, 2020 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 11, 2020—May 19, 2020 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2020 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L35A Lerdal loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 0.3 4.0% L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 0.3 3.1% L37B Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 0.6 6.9% L40B Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 2.8 32.7% L41C2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 2.3 27.2% L41D2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded 2.3 26.1% Totals for Area of Interest 8.6 100.0% Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2020 Page 3 of 3 Engineering Properties (MN) This table gives the engineering classifications and the range of engineering properties for the layers of each soil in the survey area. Hydrologic group is a group of soils having similar runoff potential under similar storm and cover conditions. Soil properties that influence runoff potential are those that influence the minimum rate of infiltration for a bare soil after prolonged wetting and when not frozen. These properties are depth to a seasonal high water table, saturated hydraulic conductivity after prolonged wetting, and depth to a layer with a very slow water transmission rate. Changes in soil properties caused by land management or climate changes also cause the hydrologic soil group to change. The influence of ground cover is treated independently. There are four hydrologic soil groups, A, B, C, and D, and three dual groups, A/D, B/D, and C/D. In the dual groups, the first letter is for drained areas and the second letter is for undrained areas. The four hydrologic soil groups are described in the following paragraphs: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. Texture is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam," for example, is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and less than 52 percent sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is 15 percent or more, an appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly." Classification of the soils is determined according to the Unified soil classification system (ASTM, 2005) and the system adopted by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO, 2004). Engineering Properties (MN)---Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2020 Page 1 of 6 The Unified system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as construction material. Soils are classified according to particle-size distribution of the fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to plasticity index, liquid limit, and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW, GP, GM, GC, SW, SP, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH, and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils exhibiting engineering properties of two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL-ML. The AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect roadway construction and maintenance. In this system, the fraction of a mineral soil that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven groups from A-1 through A-7 on the basis of particle-size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index. Soils in group A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines (silt and clay). At the other extreme, soils in group A-7 are fine grained. Highly organic soils are classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspection. If laboratory data are available, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are further classified as A-1-a, A-1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7, A-7-5, or A-7-6. As an additional refinement, the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be indicated by a group index number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the best subgrade material to 20 or higher for the poorest. Rock fragments larger than 10 inches in diameter and 3 to 10 inches in diameter are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry-weight basis. The percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage in the field to weight percentage. Percentage (of soil particles) passing designated sieves is the percentage of the soil fraction less than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight. The sieves, numbers 4, 10, 40, and 200 (USA Standard Series), have openings of 4.76, 2.00, 0.420, and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on laboratory tests of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on estimates made in the field. Liquid limit and plasticity index (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity characteristics of a soil. The estimates are based on test data from the survey area or from nearby areas and on field examination. References: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Engineering Properties (MN)---Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2020 Page 2 of 6 Report—Engineering Properties (MN) Engineering Properties (MN)–Hennepin County, Minnesota Map unit symbol and soil name Pct. of map unit Hydrolo gic group Depth USDA texture Classification Fragments Percentage passing sieve number—Liquid limit Plasticit y index Unified AASHTO >10 inches 3-10 inches 4 10 40 200 In Pct Pct Pct L35A—Lerdal loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Lerdal 80 C/D 0-13 Loam ML, CL A-6 0 0 95-100 90-100 80-95 55-75 30-40 6-15 13-47 Silty clay, clay loam, silty clay loam CL, CH, MH A-7 0 0 95-100 90-100 80-95 70-90 45-70 20-35 47-60 Clay loam, loam CL A-6 0-1 0-2 95-100 90-98 75-90 50-75 30-40 12-20 L36A—Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Hamel, overwash 50 C/D 0-12 Loam CL, SM, OH, ML A-6, A-7-5 0-4 0-2 85-100 66-98 60-94 41-67 38-57 13-18 12-26 Loam, clay loam CL, SC, MH, ML A-6, A-7-5, A-7-6 0-3 0-1 87-100 72-98 63-96 44-70 34-52 13-21 26-48 Clay loam, loam CH, SC, CL A-6, A-7-6 0-3 0-1 88-100 73-98 66-98 48-74 36-51 17-25 48-79 Clay loam, loam SC, CL A-7-6, A-6 0-3 0-1 89-100 75-98 65-97 49-75 30-44 12-24 Hamel 43 C/D 0-10 Loam, clay loam CL, SM, OH, ML A-6, A-7-5 0-4 0-2 85-100 66-98 60-97 41-70 38-60 13-20 10-24 Loam, clay loam CL, SC, MH, ML A-6, A-7-5, A-7-6 0-3 0-1 87-100 72-98 63-96 44-70 34-52 13-21 24-46 Clay loam, loam CH, SC, CL A-6, A-7-6 0-3 0-1 88-100 73-98 66-98 48-74 36-51 17-25 46-79 Clay loam, loam SC, CL A-7-6, A-6 0-3 0-1 89-100 75-98 65-97 49-75 30-44 12-24 Engineering Properties (MN)---Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2020 Page 3 of 6 Engineering Properties (MN)–Hennepin County, Minnesota Map unit symbol and soil name Pct. of map unit Hydrolo gic group Depth USDA texture Classification Fragments Percentage passing sieve number— Liquid limit Plasticit y index Unified AASHTO >10 inches 3-10 inches 4 10 40 200 In Pct Pct Pct L37B—Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Angus 80 C 0-7 Loam CL A-6, A-7-6 0 0-5 95-99 84-98 72-91 52-68 34-45 13-18 7-37 Clay loam, loam CL A-7-6 0-3 0-4 95-99 85-99 72-91 55-72 35-44 16-23 37-50 Loam, clay loam CL A-6 0-3 0-4 95-99 85-99 72-91 55-71 30-40 12-20 50-79 Loam, clay loam CL A-6 0-3 0-4 95-99 86-99 74-95 54-72 28-40 11-20 L40B—Angus- Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes Angus 45 B 0-8 Loam CL A-6 0 0-5 95-100 90-100 80-95 50-85 30-40 11-15 8-35 Clay loam, loam CL A-6 0-1 0-5 95-100 90-100 80-95 55-75 35-40 15-20 35-40 Loam, clay loam CL A-6 0-1 0-5 95-100 90-100 75-90 50-75 32-39 13-18 40-80 Clay loam, loam CL A-6 0-1 0-5 95-100 90-98 75-90 50-75 30-40 12-20 Kilkenny 40 C/D 0-11 Clay loam ML, CL A-6, A-7 0 0 95-100 95-100 80-95 70-85 35-50 10-25 11-35 Clay loam, clay, silty clay loam CH, MH A-7 0 0 95-100 90-100 80-95 65-80 50-70 25-35 35-80 Loam, clay loam CL A-6 0-1 0-2 95-100 90-98 75-90 50-75 30-40 12-20 Engineering Properties (MN)---Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2020 Page 4 of 6 Engineering Properties (MN)–Hennepin County, Minnesota Map unit symbol and soil name Pct. of map unit Hydrolo gic group Depth USDA texture Classification Fragments Percentage passing sieve number— Liquid limit Plasticit y index Unified AASHTO >10 inches 3-10 inches 4 10 40 200 In Pct Pct Pct L41C2—Lester- Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Lester, moderately eroded 50 C 0-6 Loam CL A-6, A-7-6 0 0-5 95-99 84-98 72-91 52-68 32-44 13-19 6-38 Clay loam, loam, sandy clay loam CL A-7-6 0-3 0-4 95-99 85-99 72-91 55-72 35-44 16-23 38-79 Clay loam, loam CL A-6 0-3 0-4 95-99 86-99 74-95 54-72 28-40 11-20 Kilkenny, moderately eroded 35 D 0-7 Clay loam, silty clay loam, loam, silt loam CL A-7-6 0 0 100 100 89-100 68-85 37-56 17-29 7-47 Silty clay loam, clay, clay loam CH A-7-6 0 0 100 100 89-100 69-85 46-59 25-33 47-79 Clay loam, loam CL A-6 0-3 0-4 95-99 86-99 74-95 54-72 28-40 11-20 Engineering Properties (MN)---Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2020 Page 5 of 6 Engineering Properties (MN)–Hennepin County, Minnesota Map unit symbol and soil name Pct. of map unit Hydrolo gic group Depth USDA texture Classification Fragments Percentage passing sieve number— Liquid limit Plasticit y index Unified AASHTO >10 inches 3-10 inches 4 10 40 200 In Pct Pct Pct L41D2—Lester- Kilkenny complex, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded Lester, moderately eroded 50 C 0-6 Loam CL A-6, A-7-6 0 0-5 95-99 84-98 72-91 52-68 32-44 13-19 6-38 Clay loam, loam, sandy clay loam CL A-7-6 0-3 0-4 95-99 85-99 72-91 55-72 35-44 16-23 38-79 Clay loam, loam CL A-6 0-3 0-4 95-99 86-99 74-95 54-72 28-40 11-20 Kilkenny, moderately eroded 35 C 0-7 Clay loam, silty clay loam, loam, silt loam CL A-7-6 0 0 100 100 89-100 68-85 37-56 17-29 7-47 Silty clay loam, clay, clay loam CH A-7-6 0 0 100 100 89-100 69-85 46-59 25-33 47-79 Clay loam, loam CL A-6 0-3 0-4 95-99 86-99 74-95 54-72 28-40 11-20 Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 5, 2020 Engineering Properties (MN)---Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/18/2020 Page 6 of 6 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN Drainage Analysis APPENDIX D Basin Water Quality Volume Calculations GARAGES TOO - CORCORAN SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FILTRATION WORKSHEET Requirements: Filtration of runoff generated from a 1.1” rainfall over the applicable new impervious surface within 48 hours. Step 1: Determine areas of impervious surfaces area and effective filtration area. Proposed condition impervious surface area = 193,140 sf; Total existing condition impervious surface = 67,080 sf Existing impervious surface not being fully reconstructed = 52,160 sf Net increase of impervious surface = 140,980 sf Effective Filtration Area = 4,870 sf Effective Filtration Area equals filtration basin footprint area of 1031.5 contour. Step 2: Calculate water quality volume from increase of impervious surface generated by 1.0” runoff. 140,980 sf x 1.0 x 1.1 inch x 1ft/12inch = 12,923 cf Net Increased Coefficient Rainfall Volume Impervious Required to be Surface Area Treated Step 3: Calculate volume capacity of being filtrated on site in 48 hours. Use infiltration rate for Media Mix C soils = 1.63 in/hr. 4,870 sf x 1.63 in/hr x 48 hrs x 1ft/12inch = 31,752 cf Effective Filtration Volume Filtration Rate Capacity Area in 48 Hours Step 4: Compare volume capacity to volume required to be treated. 31,752 cf > 14,474 cf > 12,923 cf Volume Volume Volume Capacity of Basin Required to in 48 Hours Storage be Treated Basin storage = 1,836 cf in 18” of soil media (30% voids at average 4,080 sf) + 12,638 cf below invert of 933.00 in effective filtration area (see stage data) Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project 22400 State Highway No. 55 Corcoran, MN STORM SEWER PIPE SIZE ANALYSIS Prepared for: Garages Too, LLC Attn: Mr. Craig Scherber 305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Phone: (612) 612-810-8400 Prepared by: Civil Engineering Site Design PO Box 566 118 East Broadway St. Monticello, MN 55362 Contact: Scott Dahlke. Phone: (763) 314-0929 sdahlke@civilesd.com April 20, 2021 Revised: 06/16/2021 Revised 09/07/2021 CESD Project # 00796 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN Pipe Size Analysis Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Narrative - Proposed Project - Site Location - Requirements - Summary - Certification Pipe Size Calculation Tabulation (Rational Method) - 10 yr Rainfall Event Pipe Size Drainage Areas - Drawing CB1 Storm Sewer Drainage Area Plan Garages Too, Corcoran, MN Pipe Size Analysis Page 3 NARRATIVE PROPOSED PROJECT: The project proposes building and site improvements for a self-storage facility consisting of multiple buildings with exterior access to all storage units. Site improvements include new buildings, pavement, utilities, a stormwater management basin, and associated site improvements. The project proposes to collect the surface storm water runoff for the project site and convey storm water to a proposed storm water management filtration basin to the northeast part of the property. SITE LOCATION: The site is located at 22400 State Highway No. 55, northerly of State Highway 55, easterly of Pioneer Trail, and westerly of Rolling Hills Road in Corcoran, MN. The project is in the SE 1/4 of SE 1/4, Section 32, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, MN. Access to the site can be achieved by the private drive from State Highway 55. REQUIREMENTS: Stormwater management design for the project is subject to review by the City of Corcoran. Pipe size analysis for on-site storm drainage is required. According to the City of Corcoran regulations, the goal for the pipe size design is to control storm water runoff for the 10-year storm event using Minnesota DOT IDF curve rainfall data. SUMMARY: The attached pipe size calculation tabulations propose to satisfy the City of Corcoran requirements. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 9/7/2021 ______________________ ______________ Scott Dahlke, P.E. Date STORM SEWER DESIGN SHEET - RATIONAL METHOD Project Name: Date:9/7/2021 CATCH BASIN CALCULATIONS PIPE CALCULATIONS STRUCTURE D.S.Travel UPSTREAM HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS ID STRUCT DA(acre)tc(area)Time tc(cb)i -10yr C CA SUM(CA)MH DIA RIM STR. ID IE DOWNSTREAM CIR.Actual UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM (min)(min)(min)(in/hr)ELEV IE STR. ID.Dia (in)Wall Lgth(ft)Grade (%)V(fps)Q (cfs)Qcap(cfs)HGL HGL(%)HGL FES D 0.04 10 10.0 5.8 0.40 0.0164141 0.02 FES N/A FES D 1037.91 0.10 CB-14 0.0 1037.90 CB-14 12 0.167 1 1.00%4.5 3.57 1038.40 0.00%1038.40 CB-14 0.20 10 10.0 5.8 0.90 0.1758264 0.19 2x3 1040.30 CB-14 1036.80 1.11 CB-13 1.0 1036.00 CB-13 12 0.167 179 0.45%3.0 2.39 1036.67 0.10%1036.50 CB-13 2.08 10 11.0 5.7 0.52 1.0698806 1.26 48 1040.30 CB-13 1035.80 7.19 CB-12 0.4 1033.70 CB-12 15 0.188 161 1.30%6.0 7.39 1036.31 1.23%1034.33 CB-12 1.57 10 11.4 5.6 0.83 1.3030992 2.57 48 1041.45 CB-12 1033.50 14.37 CB-11 0.1 1032.60 CB-11 18 0.208 48 1.88%8.2 14.42 1034.24 1.86%1033.35 CB-11 0.14 10 11.5 5.6 0.87 0.1237374 2.69 48 1041.10 CB-11 1032.20 15.06 FES-A 0.1 1032.00 FES-A 24 0.250 42 0.48%5.0 15.65 1033.19 0.44%1033.00 Garages Too, Corcoran, MN CB 14 AREA=8,510CB 13 AREA=90,430 CB 11 AREA=6,230 FES A FES C FES B CB 12 AREA=68,530 FES D AREA=1,790 OCS-1 MH 10 CB1 LEGEND: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA AG Wetland Services, Inc -1- July 8, 2021 Wetland Delineation Parcel ID 3211923440001 and 3211923440009, Corcoran Hennepin County, MN Prepared for Craig Scherber, Scott Dahlke Prepared by: Ag Wetland Services, Inc P.O. Box 534 Waconia, MN 55387 320-291-4022 AG Wetland Services, Inc -2- July 8, 2021 Table of Contents Page 1 Purpose, Location.……………….……...................................................... ...2 Site Visit, Methodology……………………………………………...........3-5 Wetland Photos and Transects……………...………….…………....….....6-7 Review Area Photos………………………………………………….........8-9 Wetland Location Map..……………………………....................................10 LIDAR Map………………….…………………………………….............11 National Wetlands Inventory Map (NWI)…………………………..….......12 Hennepin County Soils Map…...……....…..…….………...…………...13-17 Data Sheets……………………………………………………………...18-25 Prepared for Craig Scherber, Scott Dahlke Prepared by Jeremy J. Donabauer AG Wetland Services, Inc P.O. Box 534 Waconia, MN 55387 Phone: (320) 291-4022 AG Wetland Services, Inc -3- July 8, 2021 DATE: July 8, 2021 TO: Craig Scherber, Scott Dahlke FROM: Jeremy J. Donabauer AG Wetland Services, Inc SUBJECT: 6.71 ac +/- Section 32 Township 119, Range 23, Corcoran , Minnesota. PURPOSE OF THE WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT The purpose of this report is to describe the extent and location of wetlands occurring at the property located in Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN. The information herein was requested by Scott Dahlke and Craig Scherber. The wetland delineation was conducted at a level acceptable by the Local Government Unit. LOCATION OF THE SITE The site is located in Section 32, Township 119, Range 23, Corcoran , Minnesota. SITE VISIT The site was visited on July 8, 2021. The vegetation at this time was in the middle stages AG Wetland Services, Inc -4- July 8, 2021 of the growing season. The precipitation levels for this time of year were near or below normal. Jeremy J. Donabauer conducted the field delineation and delineation report. WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY The use of a multi-parameter approach (vegetation, soil and hydrology) was implemented to delineate a wetland occurring in Section 32, Township 119, Range 23, Corcoran , Minnesota. The Routine On-Site Determination method, as described in the 1987 addition of the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, was used to delineate the site. Wetlands were also classified according to Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (FWS/OBS Pub 79/31: Cowardin et al. 1979) and Wetlands of the United States (USFWS Circular 39; Shaw and Fredine 1971). Areas that are dominated by hydrophytic vegetation, meet the hydric soils criteria, and exhibit indications of wetland hydrology are identified as wetland communities. These three technical criteria are mandatory and must be satisfied in making a wetland determination. Field techniques consist of a main transect with a series of soil samples combined with vegetation data, and observations of hydrology to determine wetland boundaries. Each individual lath is generally associated with a series of soil probes (18 inches or greater in depth) that are taken in a line from obvious upland to obvious wetland. Munsell Soil Color Charts are used to determine soil chroma, mottle color and gleying color (when present). If the soil does not meet the hydric requirement, and the site lacks wetland hydrology and dominant hydric vegetation, another sample is taken 1-3 feet toward the wetland until all three requirements are met (under Normal and Undisturbed Conditions). Wetland Plant Indicator Designations OBLIGATE WETLAND (OBL): Species occurs almost always (estimated probability >99 %) in wetlands under natural conditions. FACULTATIVE WETLAND (FACW): Species usually occurs in wetlands (estimated probability 67 to 99 %) but occasionally found in non-wetlands. FACULTATIVE (FAC): Species equally likely to occur in wetlands and non-wetlands (estimated probability 34 to 64%). FACULTATIVE UPLAND (FACU): Species usually occurs in non-wetlands (estimated probability 67 to 99 %) but occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1 to 33%). OBLIGATE UPLAND (UPL): Species occurs almost always (estimated probability >99 %) in non-wetlands under natural conditions. For an area to be a jurisdictional wetland, more than 50 percent of the dominant vegetation from all strata (Herbaceous, Shrub, Sapling, Tree, and Vine) must be OBL, FACW, and/or FAC, under normal and undisturbed conditions. AG Wetland Services, Inc -5- July 8, 2021 Vegetative Dominance and Strata Dominance refers strictly to the spatial extent of a species that is directly discernible in the field. The most abundant plant species that immediately exceeds 50 percent of the total dominance for a given stratum, plus any additional species comprising 20 percent or more of the total are considered dominant plant species for that stratum. Strata for which dominants are determined include: 1. Tree - >5 inches DBH and 20 feet or taller. 2. Sapling - 0.4 to <5 inches DBH and 20 ft or taller. 3. Shrub - 3 to 20 feet tall including multistemed, bushy shrubs, trees and saplings 4. Vines - includes all woody vines. 5. Herb - includes all herbaceous plants (grass, sedge, forbs, ferns, etc.) SUMMARY Wetlands on-site were identified and delineated following the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual as required by the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 and the Corps of Engineers regulatory program under section 404 of the Clean Water Act. AG Wetland Services, Inc -6- July 8, 2021 Delineation Summary The project site is comprised of an area located in Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN for the purpose of defining the wetland boundaries. Two wetlands have been delineated and a map is included below. A site location map is included as Figure 1. Copies of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI), Hennepin County Soil Survey maps and LIDAR maps for the area of the project site are included. Figure 4 represents the approximate wetland boundary lines delineated as part of this project in an air photo. The boundaries have been flagged with pin-flags and labeled A-1 through A-10 and B-1 through B-11. Once approved, the flags will be located by a surveyor for permanent record. Wetland A and Transect A At the transect of wetland line A and the point of TA the wetland consists of a Type 2, wet meadow wetland. The contour rises into the upland community on a concave slope and the wetland edge follows a contour change and rises generally from the center of the wetland equally throughout the wetland. This can be seen in greater detail on the LiDAR contour map provided in the report. AG Wetland Services, Inc -7- July 8, 2021 Wetland B and Transect B At the transect of wetland line B and the point of TB the wetland consists of a Type 2, wet meadow wetland. The contour rises into the upland community on a concave slope and the wetland edge follows a contour change and rises generally from the center of the wetland equally throughout the wetland. This can be seen in greater detail on the LiDAR contour map provided in the report. AG Wetland Services, Inc -8- July 8, 2021 Review Area 1983 Photo AG Wetland Services, Inc -9- July 8, 2021 1986 Photo Review Area consists of an excavated pond that is approximately five feet deep wholly constructed in upland. When reviewing air photos overlain, it is apparent that this pond was constructed sometime in the 1980’s. An air photo showing the site before excavation is included below as well as photo of the pond from the site visit. AG Wetland Services, Inc -10- July 8, 2021 Approximate Wetland Delineation Line The site was investigated/delineated by: AG Wetland Services, Inc ___________________________ Jeremy J. Donabauer 0 0.03 0.06 0.090.015 Miles The State of Minnesota and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources makes no representationsor warranties expressed or implied , w ith respect to the use of maps or geographic d ata provid edherewith regard less of its format or the means of its transmission. There is no guarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy, currency, suitability, or reliability of this d atafor any purpose. The user accepts the d ata “as is." The State of Minnesota assumes no responsibility for loss or d amage incurred as a result of any user reliance on this d ata. All maps and other material provid ed herein are protected by copyright. Extreme care was used d uring the compilation of this prod uct. However, d ue to changes in ow nership and the need to rely on outsid e information, errors or omissions may exist. If you should d iscover an oversight, we encourage you to let us know by calling the DNR at 1-888-646-6367 or by e-mail at info.d nr@state.mn.us. Note: Elevation images and contours w ere generated from LiDAR d erived elevation surfaces acq uired 2007-2012. ³ Created on 7/7/2021 1:4,224Scale: Wetlands Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Wetlands Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine July 7, 2021 0 0.05 0.10.025 mi 0 0.085 0.170.0425 km 1:3,195 This page was produced by the NWI mapper National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/7/2021 Page 1 of 549906004990640499068049907204990760499080049908404990600499064049906804990720499076049908004990840451940451980452020452060452100452140452180452220452260452300 451940 451980 452020 452060 452100 452140 452180 452220 452260 452300 45° 4' 10'' N 93° 36' 38'' W45° 4' 10'' N93° 36' 20'' W45° 4' 1'' N 93° 36' 38'' W45° 4' 1'' N 93° 36' 20'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 25 50 100 150 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,760 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons Hydric (100%) Hydric (66 to 99%) Hydric (33 to 65%) Hydric (1 to 32%) Not Hydric (0%) Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines Hydric (100%) Hydric (66 to 99%) Hydric (33 to 65%) Hydric (1 to 32%) Not Hydric (0%) Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points Hydric (100%) Hydric (66 to 99%) Hydric (33 to 65%) Hydric (1 to 32%) Not Hydric (0%) Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 5, 2020 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 11, 2020—May 19, 2020 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/7/2021 Page 2 of 5 Hydric Rating by Map Unit Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L22C2 Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 2 0.2 2.4% L35A Lerdal loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 15 0.4 4.4% L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 45 1.0 9.7% L37B Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 5 0.3 3.2% L40B Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 5 2.6 26.1% L41C2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 5 2.4 23.3% L41D2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded 5 3.1 30.9% Totals for Area of Interest 10.1 100.0% Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/7/2021 Page 3 of 5 Description This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil types, each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydric. Map units that are made up dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric components in the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made up dominantly of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric components in the lower positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based on its respective components and the percentage of each component within the map unit. The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric components. The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric components, 66 to 99 percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric components, 1 to 32 percent hydric components, and less than one percent hydric components. In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the map pane contains a column named 'Rating'. In this column the percentage of each map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed. Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (Federal Register, 1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation. The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register, 2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993). If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric, they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field. These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006). References: Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/7/2021 Page 4 of 5 Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Percent Present Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/7/2021 Page 5 of 5 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s): Jeremy Donabauer Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Scott Dahlke, Craig Scherber State: slight hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: Y Hamel NWI Classification: 1 Lat:Long:45.04.05.47 Datum:93.36.27.81 Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Absolute % Cover If yes, optional wetland site ID:Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 0 0 0 2.00 100 200 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Phalaris arundinacea 90 Y FACW (Plot size: 5 Carex tenera 10 N FACW Y 0 Scherber Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 100 (Plot size: Tree Stratum (Plot size: google earth 100 200 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 1 1 0 0 100.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/8/21 Sampling Point:TA1MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave S. 32, T 119, R23 (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14)X X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Sampling Point:TA1 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** 0-24 10 y/r 21 90 10 y/r 5/6 10 C PL Sandy clay loam redox Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: mix/filled soil Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): 0 Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):10 10 *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s): Jeremy Donabauer Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Scott Dahlke, Brian Derosier State: slight hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: Y Lester Kilkenny NWI Classification: 1 Lat:Long:45.04.05.47 Datum:93.36.28.81 N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Absolute % Cover If yes, optional wetland site ID:N Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 20 60 0 3.80 100 380 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Taraxacum officinale 60 Y FACU (Plot size: Poa pratensis 20 Y FAC Glechoma hederacea 20 Y N 0 Scherber Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 100 (Plot size: Tree Stratum (Plot size: google earth FACU 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 3 1 80 320 33.33% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/8/21 Sampling Point:TA2MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave S. 32, T 119, R23 (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:TA2 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** 0-2 10 yr 3/2 100 Sandy clay Loam 16-20 10 yr 4/4 100 Loam mix/filled Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): 0 Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s): Jeremy Donabauer Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Scott Dahlke, Craig Scherber State: slight hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: Y Hamel NWI Classification: 1 Lat:Long:45.04.05.47 Datum:93.36.27.81 Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Absolute % Cover If yes, optional wetland site ID:Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 0 0 0 2.00 100 200 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW (Plot size: 5 Y 0 Scherber Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 100 (Plot size: Tree Stratum (Plot size: google earth 100 200 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 1 1 0 0 100.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/8/21 Sampling Point:TB1MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave S. 32, T 119, R23 (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14)X X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Sampling Point:TB1 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** 0-24 10 y/r 21 90 10 y/r 5/6 10 C PL Sandy clay loam redox Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: mix/fill Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): 0 Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):10 10 *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s): Jeremy Donabauer Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Scott Dahlke, Brian Derosier State: slight hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: Y Lester Kilkenny NWI Classification: 1 Lat:Long:45.04.05.47 Datum:93.36.28.81 N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Absolute % Cover If yes, optional wetland site ID:N Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 30 90 0 3.70 100 370 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Taraxacum officinale 60 Y FACU (Plot size: Poa pratensis 30 Y FAC Glechoma hederacea 10 N N 0 Scherber Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 100 (Plot size: Tree Stratum (Plot size: google earth FACU 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 2 1 70 280 50.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/8/21 Sampling Point:TB2MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave S. 32, T 119, R23 (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:TB2 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** 0-3 10 yr 3/2 100 Sandy clay Loam 3-20 10 yr 4/4 100 Loam mix/fill Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): 0 Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 1 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: City of Corcoran County: Hennepin Applicant Name: Scherber & Associates, Craig Scherber, Scott Dahlke Applicant Representative: Jeremy Donabauer – AG Wetland Services, Inc. Project Name: Garages Too – Scherber/Dahlke Wetland LGU Project No. (if any): Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 07/09/2021 Date of LGU Decision: 08/2/2021 Date this Notice was Sent: 08/11/2021 WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ☒ Wetland Boundary/Type ☐ Sequencing ☐ Replacement Plan ☐ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ☒ No-Loss (8420.0415) ☐ Exemption (8420.0420) Part: ☒ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Click here to enter text. Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits: ☐ Bank Credits: Bank Account Number(s): Click here to enter text. Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) (See attached Findings) ☒ Approve ☐ Approve w/Conditions ☐ Deny ☐ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ☐ Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 ☒ Approved1 ☐ Denied List Conditions: Decision-Maker for this Application: ☒ Staff ☐ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other: Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify): 1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project - specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been reco rded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1. ☐ Attachment(s) (specify): ☒ Summary: On behalf of the Applicant, Jeremy Donabauer (AG Wetland Services) submitted a wetland delineation report for the approximately 6.71-acre subject property located across two parcels at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive in the City of Corcoran. Two wetlands and one incidental wetland (“Area 1”) were delineated on the site. TEP members Lucas Mueller (LGU) and Ben Carlson (BWSR) conducted a field review of the property on July 19, 2021. Area 1 was determined to be an incidental wetland based on a review of historical aerial photos showing the basin to be excavated in a previously upland area and thus qualifies for the No Loss criteria, Part A. The TEP agreed with the wetland type and boundaries as delineated by Jeremy Donabauer on July 8, 2021 as well as the No Loss determination. BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 2 The TEP recommends the approval of the Wetland Boundary/Type Application as submitted by AG Wetland Services on 7/9/2021 and the No Loss Application submitted on 7/28/2021. 1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. Attached Project Documents ☒ Site Location Map ☐ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e -mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ☐ Yes1 ☒ No 1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ☒ SWCD TEP Member: Stacey Lijewski, Hennepin SWCD ☒ BWSR TEP Member: Ben Carlson ☒ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): Wes Boll, Wenck (now part of Stantec) ☒ DNR Representative: Lucas Youngsma ☒ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Elm Creek Watershed District ☒ Applicant: Craig Scherber, Scott Dahlke (cescherber@yahoo.com, sdahlke@civilesd.com) ☒ Agent/Consultant: Jeremy Donabauer – AG Wetland Services, Inc. (jeremydonabauer@hotmail.com) Optional or As Applicable: ☒ Corps of Engineers: usace_requests_mn@usace.army.mil ☐ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ☐ Members of the Public (notice only): ☐ Other: Signature: Date: 8/11/2021 BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 3 This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. BUILDING SETBACK LINEBUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS:BLDG "A"BLDG "B"BLDG "C"BLDG "D"W = [ (130*30) + (70*30) + (130*30) + (70*20) ] / 400W = 28.25If = [ (400 / 400) - 0.25 ] * 28.25 / 30If = 0.7063 or 70.63%Type of Construction: V-B"S1": AREAal = 9000 + (9000*0.7063) or 15358 sf"S1": AREAac = 9285 sf ... PASSESW = [ (270*30) + (60*0) + (270*30) + (60*30) ] / 600W = 30If = [ (600 / 660) - 0.25 ] * 30 / 30If = 0.659 or 65.90%Type of Construction: III-B"S1": AREAal = 17500 + (17500*0.659) or 29032 sf"S1": AREAac = 18506 sf ... PASSESW = [ (330*30) + (70*30) + (330*30) + (70*30) ] / 800W = 30If = [ (800 / 800) - 0.25 ] * 30 / 30If = 0.75 or 75%Type of Construction: III-B"S1": AREAal = 17500 + (17500*0.75) or 30625 sf"S1": AREAac = 9973 sf ... PASSESW = [ (240*20) + (60*30) + (240*30) + (60*30) ] / 600W = 26If = [ (600 / 600) - 0.25 ] * 26 / 30If = 0.649 or 64.90%Type of Construction: III-B"S1": AREAal = 17500 + (17500*0.649) or 28857 sf"S1": AREAac = 14400 sf ... PASSESW = (L1 * w1 + L2 * w2 + L3 * w3 + L4* w4) / F ... equation 5-4If = [ F / P - 0.25 ] W / 30 ... equation 5-5BUILDING "C"6 UNITS (10800 sf)60' x 180'FFE: 1043.00BUILDING "C"5 UNITS (9000 sf)60' x 150'FFE: 1045.00BUILDING "D"8 UNITS (14400 sf)60' x 240'FFE: 1046.50BUILDING "B"7 UNITS (9973 sf)60' x 20'70' x 125'FFE: 1043.00BUILDING "B"6 UNITS (8573 sf)60' x 20'70' x 105'FFE: 1045.00BUILDING "A"5 UNITS (9285 sf)60' x 150'+FFE: 1043.00FIRE BARRIERFIRE BARRIERSTORM WATER MANAGEMENT PONDSSUMMARY:OCCUPANCY (ALL BUILDINGS) S-1 MODERATE HAZARDFIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM NO SPRINKLERING OF ANY OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGSFIRE BARRIERS REQUIRED @ 3-HR FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGBUILDINGS "B", "C" & "D" 12,000sf MAXIMUM FIRE AREAFDC (150' HOSE REQUIREMENT) SHOWN @ BUILDINGS "C" & "D"(DRY LINE ONLY PROVIDING ACCESS TO REAR OF BUILDING)FIRE BARRIERFIRE AREA "D1"10800 sfFIRE AREA "D2"3600 sfFIRE AREA "C1"10800 sfFIRE AREA "C2"9000 sfFIRE AREA "B1"9973 sfFIRE AREA "B2"8573 sfR 150' - 0"R 150' - 0"R 150' - 0"R 1 50' - 0"FDC (DRY)FDC (DRY)FDC (DRY)FDC (DRY)RETAINING WALLBUILDING "D"BUILDING "B2"BUILDING "B1"3-HR FIRE WALLBUILDING "A"010 204070010 204070Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.comAs indicatedPR-1SITE DEVELOPMENTCONCEPT (37 UNITS)20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateNORTHSOUTH VIEW of PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTSITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN121CITY REVIEW UPDATES7-2-2021 5PR-4COMMON SPACE(FACILITY MAINTENANCE)520 sfUNIT #A-11861 sfUNIT #A-21843 sfUNIT #A-31800 sfUNIT #A-41800 sfUNIT #A-51800 sfTYPICAL WALL SECTION(ALL BUILDINGS)CONCRETE APRONCONCRETE PATIOCOLUMN PIERS (2) @ COVERED ENTRYTYPICAL DEMISING WALL * 1-HR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING (FLOOR TO CEILING) * DRAFT STOP TO ROOF DECK PER CODE5 UNITS @ 30'-0"150' - 0"9' - 7"60' - 0"25' - 11"4' - 2"BUILDING "A" TOTAL LENGTH: 159' - 5"UNIT #B-11203 sfUNIT #B-21404 sfUNIT #B-31400 sfUNIT #B-41400 sfUNIT #B-51400 sfUNIT #B-61400 sfUNIT #B-71750 sfUNIT #B-81750 sfUNIT #B-91400 sfUNIT #B-101400 sfUNIT #B-111400 sfUNIT #B-121404 sfUNIT #B-131203 sfBUILDING "B" TOTAL LENGTH: 270' - 0"70' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"BUILDING "B-1" TOTAL WIDTH: 70' - 0"6 UNITS @ 20'-0"120' - 0"25' - 0"BUILDING "B-1" TOTAL LENGTH: 145' - 0"BUILDING "B-2" TOTAL LENGTH: 125' - 0"5 UNITS @ 20'-0"100' - 0"25' - 0"3-HR FIRE RESISTANCERATED MASONRY WALLTYPICAL DEMISING WALL * SEE BLDG "A"TYPICAL SERVICEDOOR 3' x 7'TYPICAL OHD12' x 12'PROTECTIVE BOLLARDPROTECTIVE BOLLARDPROTECTIVE BOLLARDPROTECTIVE BOLLARDCONCRETE APRONLANDSCAPE ISLANDLANDSCAPE ISLANDFIRE AREA "B1"9973 sfFIRE AREA "B2"8573 sf010204070010204070Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.comAs indicatedPR-2FLOOR PLANSBUILDINGS "A" & "B"20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEWNORTH# Description DateFLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "A"FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "B"12TOTAL AREA: 9285 sfTOTAL AREA "B-1": 9973 sfTOTAL AREA "B-2": 8573 sfENTRY VIEW (daylight)ENTRY VIEW (evening)1 CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 UNIT "C-1"1800 sfUNIT "C-2"1800 sfUNIT "C-3"1800 sfUNIT "C-4"1800 sfUNIT "C-5"1800 sfUNIT "C-6"1800 sfUNIT "C-7"1800 sfUNIT "C-8"1800 sfUNIT "C-9"1800 sfUNIT "C-10"1800 sfUNIT "C-11"1800 sfBUILDING "C" TOTAL LENGTH: 330' - 0"4 UNITS @ 30'-0"BUILDING "C-2" TOTAL LENGTH: 149' - 8"7 UNITS @ 30'-0"BUILDING "C-1" TOTAL LENGTH: 180' - 4"60' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"3-HR FIRE RESISTANCERATED MASONRY WALLCONCRETE APRONTYPICAL OHD12' x 12'TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR3' x 7'LANDSCAPE ISLANDTYPICAL WINDOW48" x 24" AWNINGTYPICAL DEMISING WALL * SEE BLDG "A"FDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESSFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESS2-1/2" DRY LINE CONCEALEDIN DEMISING WALL- PITCHPIPE TO DRAINFIRE AREA "C2"9000 sfFIRE AREA "C1"10800 sf8 UNITS @ 30'-0"TOTAL BUILDING "D" LENGTH: 240' - 0"60' - 0"UNIT #D-11800 sfUNIT #D-21800 sfUNIT #D-31800 sfUNIT #D-41800 sfUNIT #D-51800 sfUNIT #D-61800 sfUNIT #D-71800 sfUNIT #D-81800 sfCONCRETE APRONTYPICAL OHD12' x 12'TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR3' x 7'TYPICAL WINDOW48" x 24" AWNINGTYPICAL DEMISING WALL * SEE BLDG "A"FDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESSFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESS2-1/2" DRY LINE CONCEALEDIN DEMISING WALL- PITCHPIPE TO DRAIN3-HR FIRE RESISTANCERATED MASONRY WALLFIRE AREA "D1"10800 sfFIRE AREA "D2"3600 sf010204070010204070Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.com3/32" = 1'-0"PR-3FLOOR PLANSBUILDINGS "C" & "D"20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateNORTHNORTHFLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "C"FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "D"12TOTAL AREA "C-1": 12,600 sfTOTAL AREA "C-2": 7,200 sfTOTAL "D": 14,400 sf1 CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 PROTECTIVE BOLLARDMASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)ASPHALT SHINGLEROOFING SYSTEMPRE-FINISHED METALFASCIA (FLAT)OHD (PAINT SOFT GRAY)SERVICE DOOR(PAINT SOFT GRAY)ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)DECORATIVE FIXED WINDOWw/ PRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM"3-STEP" PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA @ SIGNATURE UNITDECORATIVE COLUMN w/STONE PIERS & CAPWALL LIGHTWALL LIGHTDOOR TRIMLAP SIDING (PAINT)SOFFIT BOXES (PAINT)912PROTECTIVE BOLLARDROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)TYPICAL AWNING WINDOW(PRE-FINISHED CLAD UNIT)PRE-FINISHED METALFASCIA (FLAT)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA("3-STEP")LAP SIDING (PAINT)912PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)ROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILLLAP SIDING @ UPPER GABLE END WALLS (PAINT)ASPHALT SINGLE ROOFING SYSTEM"3-STEP" FASCIADECORATIVE POST & BASEDOOR TRIM(PAINT)612612EQEQBUIDLING "A" HEIGHT21' - 10"612612PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)LAP SIDING @ UPPER GABLE END WALLS (PAINT)ASPHALT SINGLE ROOFING SYSTEM"3-STEP" FASCIADECORATIVE POST & BASEROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILLWALL FOOTING12" CMU FOUNDATION WALLFINISHED GRADE10" ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL (WAINSCOTE COLOR)8" ROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIAPRE-FINISHED METAL SOFFITASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEMPRE-ENGINEERED WOOD ROOF TRUSSESTYPICAL BEARING WALL HEIGHT14' - 0"612012345505102040051020400510204005102040Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.comAs indicatedPR-4EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS(BUILDING "A")20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateSOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "A"NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "A"EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING "A"WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING "A"TYPICAL WALL SECTION123451 CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 PROTECTIVE BOLLARDROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)METAL FASCIA (FLAT)ASPHALT SHINGLEROOFING SYSTEMTYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")TYPICAL OHD(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")ROOF STEP @ FIRE WALLROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)PROTECTIVE BOLLARDSTEP IN ROOF @ END UNITSPROTECTIVE BOLLARDROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)METAL FASCIA (FLAT)ASPHALT SHINGLEROOFING SYSTEMTYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")TYPICAL OHD(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")ROOF STEP @ FIRE WALLROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)PROTECTIVE BOLLARDSTEP IN ROOF @ END UNITS612612PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ ROOF (BEYOND)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ END GABLE .ROCK FACE CMU (FIELD COLOR)PROTECTIVE BOLLARDROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT)EQEQBUILDING "B" HEIGHT23' - 8"612612PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ ROOF (BEYOND)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ END GABLE .ROCK FACE CMU (FIELD COLOR)PROTECTIVE BOLLARDROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT)010204070010204070010204070010204070Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.com1" = 10'-0"PR-5EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS(BUILDING "B")20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateSOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "B"1NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "B"2EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING "B"3WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING "B"41 CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")ROOF STEPS @ FIRE BARRIERFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESS612612PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ ROOF (BEYOND)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ END GABLE .ROCK FACE CMU (FIELD COLOR)MASONRY SILL OVERROCK FACE WALL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT)EQEQBUILDING "C" HEIGHT23' - 6"612612PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ ROOF (BEYOND)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ END GABLE .ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT)010204070010204070010204070010204070MASONRY SILLROCK FACE CMUROCK FACE CMUMETAL FASCIAASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEMTYPICAL OHD(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")MASONRY SILLROCK FACE CMUROCK FACE CMUMETAL FASCIAASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEMROOF STEPS @FIRE BARRIERTYPICAL CLAD AWNINGWINDOW UNITFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESSScale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.com1" = 10'-0"PR-6EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS(BUILDING "C")20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateSOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "C"1NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "C"2EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING "C"3WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING "C"41CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 010204070010204070010204070010204070TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")TYPICAL OHD(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)ROCK FACE CMU (FIELD COLOR)MASONRY SILL (WAINSCOTE COLOR)ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEMFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESSASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEMPRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)ROCK FACE CMU (FIELD COLOR)TYPICAL CLAD AWNINGWINDOW UNITFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESSROCK FACE CMUMASONRY SILLROCK FACE CMUPRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)LAP SIDING (PAINT)CONCRETE / MASONRYRETAINING WALLEQ EQBUILDING "D" HEIGHT21' - 7"612612ROCK FACE CMUMASONRY SILLROCK FACE CMUPRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)LAP SIDING (PAINT)CONCRETE / MASONRYRETAINING WALLScale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.com3/32" = 1'-0"PR-7EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS(BUILDING "D")20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateSOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "D"1NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "D"2EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING "D"3WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING "D"41 CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 MATERIALS DISPLAY BOARDNEW STORAGE FACILITY - GARAGES TOO , LLC0$18)$&785('6721(9(1((5&21&5(7(6721(6,//7<3,&$/75,0/$36,',1*62)),7)$6&,$75,067(363(&,$/)$6&,$29(5+($''225$63+$/76+,1*/(652&.)$&(&21&5(7(%/2&. :$,16&27(&21&5(7(6,//52&.)$&(&21&5(7(%/2&. ),(/'62)),7)$6&,$75,0&28175</('*(6721(:+($721%/(1' &8/785('6721(Z0,;('$&&(176,17(*5$/&2/25('&$67&21&5(7(6,//RU1$785$/&876721(6,///360$576,'(75,0 3$,17('6+(5:,1:,//,$066: 385(:+,7( /360$576,'(6,',1* 3$,17('6+(5:,1:,//,$066: /,*+7)5(1&+*5$< 35(),1,6+('%<29(5+($''225&203$1<25,76(48,9$/(17 ),1,6+('720$7&+6+(5:,1:,//,$066: 385(:+,7( /360$576,'(75,0 3$,17('6+(5:,1:,//,$066: 385(:+,7( :5$33('Z35(),1,6+('0(7$/720$7&+62)),762:(16&251,1*'85$7,21 $0%(5:5$33('Z35(),1,6+('0(7$/720$7&+62)),76,17(*5$/&2/25('81,76%<5&3%/2&. %5,&.25,76(48,9$/(17&$67/(*5(<&$67&21&5(7(6,//Z,17(*5$/&2/25720$7&+:$,16&27(,17(*5$/&2/25('81,76%<5&3%/2&. %5,&.25,76(48,9$/(17&+$5&2$/ WKP WAL-PAK 27, 32 and 46W LED WALL MOUNT LUMINAIRE S treetworks The Streetworks Wal-Pak Series of wall luminaires provides traditional architectural style with high performance energy efficient illumination. Rugged die-cast aluminum construction, stainless steel hardware along with a sealed and gasketed optical compartment make the Wal- Pak virtually impenetrable to contaminants. IP66 Rated. UL and cUL wet location listed. The Wal-Pak wall luminaire is ideal for pathway illumination, building entrances, vehicle ramps, schools, tunnels, stairways and loading docks. DESCRIPTIO N SPECIFICATION FEATURES Housing Rugged one-piece die-cast aluminum housing and hinged, removable die-cast aluminum door. One-piece silicone gasket seals the optical chamber. UL 1598 wet location listed and IP66 ingress protection rated. Not recommended for car wash applications. Electrical LED driver and related electrical components are hard mounted to the die-cast housing for optimal heat sinking and operating efficiency. Wiring is extended through a silicone gasket at the back of the housing. Three 1/2” threaded conduit entry points allow for thru-branch wiring. LED thermal management system incorporates both conduction and natural convection to transfer heat rapidly away from LED source. Integral LED electronic driver incorporates internal fusing designed to withstand a 6kV surge test and is Class 2 rated for 120-277V with an operating temperature of -40º to 55ºC. Wal-Pak LED systems maintain greater than 93% of the initial light output after 72,000 hours of operation. O ptical Highly reflective anodized aluminum reflectors provide high efficiency illumination. Optical assemblies include impact resistant borosilicate refractive glass, and full cutoff IESNA compliant configurations. Patented, solid state LED luminaires are thermally optimized with three lumen packages. D oor Assembly Single point, captive stainless steel hardware secures the removable hinged door allowing for ease of installation and maintenance. Door assembly is hinged at the bottom for easy removal and installation. Finish Finished in five-stage super TGIC polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness for superior protection against fade and wear. Standard color is bronze. Additional colors available in white, grey, bronze, black, dark platinum and graphite metallic. Consult your lighting representitive at Cooper Lighting Solutions for a complete selection of standard colors. Efficiency Standards Notice Select luminaires are manufactured to USA and California efficiency regulations. C ERTIFICATIO N DATA UL and cUL Wet Location Listed IP66 Rated 40°C Maximum Ambient Temperature External Supply Wiring 90°C Minimum Title 20 Compliant LM79 / LM80 Compliant E NERG Y DATA 120-277V 50/60Hz SHIPPING DATA Approximate Net Weight: 32-42 lbs. (15-19 kgs.) 16-5/8" [422mm] Small 11-3/8" [290mm]Small 15" [381mm] 10" [254mm] 16-5/8" [422mm] 10" [254mm] BOROSILICATE GLASS DOOR FULL CUTOFF DOOR DIMENSIONS Catalog #Type Date Project Comments Prepared by TD514004EN May 24, 2021 4:56 PM WKP6BLEDEDFC-7040 7-2-2021 Garages Too LLC Full light cutoff SDK Architects LLC LUMEN MAINTENANCECURRENT DRAW WKP WAL-PAK LUMEN MULTIPLIER O RDERING INFO RMATION P O WER AND LUMENS TD514004EN May 24, 2021 4:56 PM page 2 Sample Number: WKP3BLEDEUGL Product Family Lamp Wattage 1 Lamp Ty pe Driver Type Voltage 2 Door/Lens TypeColor WKP=Wal-Pak LED 3B=(3 Package), 27W 4B=(4 Package), 32W 6B=(6 Package), 46W LED=Solid State Light Emitting Diodes E=Electronic LED Dimming (0-10V) Driver 9=347V 3 8=480V 3 U=Universal (120-277V) GL=Borosilicate Glass Door FC=Full Cutoff Door AP=Grey BZ=Bronze BK=Black WH=White Options (Add as Suffix)Accessories (Order Separately) 7030=70 CRI / 3000K CCT 7040=70 CRI / 4000K CCT 5=Non NEMA Photocontrol (Must Specify Voltage) B=Two-Position Terminal Block WG/WPGL=Wire Guard Borosilicate Glass Lens Door WG/WPFC=Wire Guard Full Cutoff Door TR/WP=Tamper-resistant Screw and Bit VS/WPGL=Polycarbonate Vandal Shield for Borosilicate Glass Lens Door NOTES: 1. LED packages based on 70 CRI / 5000K package at 25°C ambient. 2.105°C Rated wire required for thru-branch wiring. Thru-branch wiring is rated for 40°C. Higher wattage thru-branch wiring is rated for use in 25°C ambient operating environments. 3.Not available with thru-branch wiring. LED will be supported with integral step down transformer. Catalog Number Lumens Power Consumption (Watts)B.U.G. Rating Correlated Color Temperature CCT (Kelvin) Color Rendering Index (CRI) Borosilicate Glass Door (GL) WKP3BLEDEDGL-7040 3,270 27W B1-U3-G1 4000K 73 WKP4BLEDEDGL-7040 4,160 32W B1-U3-G2 4000K 73 WKP6BLEDEDGL-7040 5,828 46W B1-U4-G4 4000K 73 WKP3BLEDEDGL 3,333 27W B1-U3-G1 5000K 72 WKP4BLEDEDGL 4,199 32W B1-U3-G3 5000K 73 WKP6BLEDEDGL 5,883 46W B1-U4-G4 5000K 73 Full Cutoff Door (FC) WKP3BLEDEDFC-7040 1,884 27W B1-U0-G1 4000K 72 WKP4BLEDEDFC-7040 2,239 32W B1-U0-G1 4000K 73 WKP6BLEDEDFC-7040 3,137 47W B1-U0-G1 4000K 73 WKP3BLEDEDFC 1,912 27W B1-U0-G1 5000K 72 WKP4BLEDEDFC 2,279 32W B1-U0-G1 5000K 73 WKP6BLEDEDFC 3,192 46W B1-U0-G1 5000K 73 Ambient Temperature Lumen Multiplier 10°C 1.07 15°C 1.04 25°C1 1.00 40°C0 0.94 Ambient Temperature TM-21 Lumen Maintenance (72,000 Hours)* Theoretical L70 (Hours 25°C>93%>340,000 40°C>92%>316,000 *Per TM-21 data. Light Engine 3B 4B 6B Nominal Power (Watts)r 27W 32W 46W Input Current @ 120V (A)0.24 0.28 0.40 Input Current @ 208V (A)0.14 0.18 0.2 3 Input Current @ 240V (A)0.13 0.15 0.20 Input Current @ 277V (A)0.11 0.13 0.18 Input Current @ 347V (A)0.09 0.11 0.15 Input Current @ 480V (A)0.10 0.12 0.14 Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Cooper Lighting Solutions 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 P: 770-486-4800 www.cooperlighting.com Project Catalog #Type Prepared by Notes Date PS517008EN page 1 April 6, 2021 4:55 PM Top Product Features •Lumen output in 1500, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000, 8000 lm •Color temperature in 2700K, 3000K, 3500K, 4000K CCT •CRI in 80 CRI or 90 CRI •Reflector distributions in Narrow, Medium, Wide, and Wall Wash with rotatable linear spread lens •Reflector finishes in Specular clear, semi-specular (haze), matte white, black baffle, and white baffle finishes Interactive Menu •Order Information page 2 •Product Specifications page 3 •Photometric Data page 4 •Energy & Performance Data page 6 •Connected Systems page 7 •Product Warranty Dimensional and Mounting Details Scale HC8 | HM8 | 81 8-inch downlight and wall wash 1500 lm 9’ [2.7m] 2000 lm 10’ [3.0m] 3000 lm 14’ [4.3m] 4000 lm 16’ [4.9m] 6000 lm 18’ [5.5m] 8000 lm 20’ [6.1m] WaveLinx Typical Applications Office • Education • Healthcare • Hospitality Nominal values for 15 - 20 footcandles at nadir. (CEILING THICKNESS) MAX MODULE HEIGHT (SEE TABLE) Ø 8-5/16” [212mm] (REFLECTOR INNER APERTURE) Ø 9-1/4” [235mm] (CEILING CUT OUT) Ø 9-3/4” [248mm] (TRIM FLANGE) 3-1/2” [89mm] 1/2” [13mm] (DRIVER HEIGHT) 26-3/8” [671mm] 11” [280mm] HM8 LED module HC8 Remodel (hangar bars removded) additional product diagrams 4VSHYGX'IVXMƼGEXMSR Product Features SDK Architects LLC 7-2-2021 Garages Too LLC Corcoran, MN see below 1 Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:FW: Letter of Support-Garages Too From: Jon Rausch/USA <Jon.Rausch@cushwake.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 10:18 AM To: Kendra Lindahl, AICP <KLindahl@landform.net>; Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov>; Brad Martens (bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us) <bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us>; Kenton Torve (ktorve@wenck.com) <ktorve@wenck.com> Subject: Letter of Support‐Garages Too Kendra/Brad/Natalie/Kent: Please share with the city council regarding my support of the Garages Too project. I am the owner of the 55 acre property immediately west of Mr. Sherber’s project. I want to express my support for this development. I expressly like the fact that the city is willing to allow his project on well and septic. Additionally, I like the flexibility the council is having over building materials. I think this project will ignite some development. We hope to bring a project forward in the near future that will feed off of his and increase the tax base within the city of Corcoran. Thank you , JR Jon Rausch Executive Director Brokerage Services www.landmnwi.com Mobile: +1 612 685 8288 jon.rausch@cushwake.com Please see our website to view our privacy notice / statement. From:Lisa Wyffels To:Brad Martens Subject:Garages Too Date:Thursday, August 5, 2021 9:35:50 AM Hi Brad, I apologize for the late input but I am not sure I will be able to log into the planning meeting tonight so I wanted to give a little input for the Garages Too project. If you could pass this along to the commissioners that would be great. I am concerned about the additional traffic this will add so close to the Rolling Hills Road entrance and the potential safety hazards it will add to driving the portion of hwy 55. It has become increasingly difficult to turn out onto 55 and it will continue to get worse as more people move out that direction. I have seen so many unsafe things happen because people get sick of waiting or they simply don't see certain vehicles coming. Also, I presume a good portion of vehicles entering and exiting will be towing trailers of some kind. Having these vehicles turn into there will cause even more backups and accidents without the addition of turn lanes. It is not uncommon for traffic to be backed up all the way from 19 to Rolling Hills or even farther past that during higher traffic times. Again, unsafe things happen when vehicles try to turn during those backups. Increased traffic will aggravate that even more. Having this land rezoned feels premature given the unknowns of that area. Correct me if I am wrong but there isn't a specific timeline for adding in that frontage road. We also don't know when they will decide to widen 55 in which case they plan to make Rolling Hills a right in and right out only. This will force anyone needing to go east on 55 to take Horseshoe Trail to Willow. Does the city plan to pave Horseshoe Trail at that time? Thank you, Lisa Wyffels 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 8c. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: September 15, 2021 for the September 23, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Sketch Plan for 23185 County Road 10 (city file 21-033) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:October 16, 2021 1.Description of Request The applicant, Nate Kariniemi, is requesting an opportunity to appear before the City Council to solicit informal comments on a sketch plan for a proposed subdivision of 23185 County Road 10. The proposal includes subdividing the property into three commercial lots on the west side of the site and 15 rural residential lots on the east and south side of the site, with a large outlot dividing the east and west sides of the site. The residential portion of the property would require an Open Space and Preservation (OS&P) plat. 2.Context The site is an existing 124.5-acre lot with a single-family residential structure on the northeast corner of the site. There are 13 development rights on the property. Zoning and Land Use The site is guided Rural/Ag Residential in the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned RR (Rural Residential). A shoreland overlay district runs through the center of the property for Rush Creek. Surrounding Properties The properties to the east, south and west are guided Rural/Ag Residential and zoned RR (Rural Residential). The properties to the north are guided Rural Service/Commercial and zoned CR (Rural Commercial). The public works facility is surrounded by this property on the western portion of the site. Natural Characteristics of the Site Rush Creek runs through the center of the site. There are natural plant communities on the site identified as a high-quality maple/basswood area on the Natural Resource Inventory Areas Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Further, multiple wetlands are shown on Hennepin County’s Natural Resources mapping software as shown on the Site Location map. Kariniemi Sketch Plan (21-033) 2 September 23, 2021 3. ANALYSIS: Sketch Plan The sketch plan process provides an opportunity for the applicant to get information from the City that can be incorporated into a formal development application. The next steps would be: 1. Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and OS&P Plat 2. Application for Final Plat (and development contract) The plan shows a road connection to the site to the east. The formal plan application must include a ghost plat or concept plan for the site to the east and a ghost plat for how the open space outlots could develop in the future if sewer and water became available. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning The proposed land use and zoning for the site will require a change on the western portion of the site from Rural/Ag Residential to Rural Service/Commercial for the land use and Rural Residential to Rural Commercial for the zoning. This is a policy change and the Council has a higher level of discretion when reviewing these types of applications. The proposed commercial land would abut commercial land on the north and the public works garage on the south. The change would allow additional commercial opportunities in the City. • City Council should provide feedback on this request. Development Rights The site has 13 development rights. The applicant’s proposal shows three assigned to the commercial lots (Lots C-1, C-2 and C-3) and 10 residential lots. The plan shows a 51.2-acre Outlot A and a 3.5-acre Outlot B, each with no development rights. Open Space and Preservation Plat (OS&P) The sketch plan would require an OS&P plat with a formal application to increase the development rights to allow the 15 single family lots shown on the sketch plan. The applicant is not including the 3 commercial lots in the OS&P plat. This reduces the gross acreage of the OS&P plat to 99.4 acres. As part of the OS&P plat 50% of the gross land area is required to be dedicated as preserved open space in no more than 2 parcels. Of the 50% open space 50% must be upland area. The sketch plan shows compliance with the 50% open space requirement but without a wetland delineation we are unable to determine if the upland area can be provided. It appears that the sketch plan could comply with the upland requirement. The ghost plat required with a formal application should show how this upland area could be developed and accessed in the future if sewer and water became available. Outlot A is shown with 60-foot-wide area leading off the cul-de-sac. The ghost plat should show if this for a future road access, to provide a connection to the open space or for access to the farm areas. Kariniemi Sketch Plan (21-033) 3 September 23, 2021 The open space is being provided in Outlot A and Outlot B. The Code requires “Open space shall be in a contiguous, connected configuration including or adjacent to existing natural areas or parks. Open space that is divided by a local street shall be considered contiguous.” Outlot B is not connected to Outlot A and does not meet the open space requirements. Outlot B has no building rights and must be eliminated. An HOA will be required to be created for the development and with a formal application the applicant will need to clarify if the open space will be maintained by the HOA or remain with developer. Regardless of who maintains the open space, a preservation, restoration and management plan will be required with a formal application for review and approval by the city. The applicant is proposing to increase the existing 10 development rights into 15 development rights by utilizing the 150% bonus available for OS&P plats that develop with a rural street section. The development would be required to comply with the standard rural street section and would not be allowed to have private drives. Lots 4-6 on the southwest corner of the site heavily impact the high-quality maple/basswood forest. The OS&P ordinance states that the objective of the ordinance is to preserve natural resource areas identified by the Comprehensive Plan. The arrangement of residential lots should be designed to achieve as many of the objectives in the OS&P ordinance. One of which is to locate lots to preserve natural resources to the maximum extent possible in a contiguous, connected configuration. Staff recommends that Lots 5 and 6 on the southwest corner be removed and Outlot B be platted as a lot in in order to preserve the High-Quality natural resources in the southwest area. • The Council should provide direction. Lot Standards The sketch plan appears to show compliance with the RR and CR standards, which require the following minimum standards: OS&P CR (Rural Commercial) Lot Area 4 acres (maximum) 2.5 acres (minimum) Minimum Lot Width 100 feet Minimum Lot Depth 200 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet 100 feet Front, From all other streets 25 feet 50 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 25 feet n/a Side 10 feet 20 feet Rear 25 feet 20 feet Adjacent to Residential n/a 50 feet Kariniemi Sketch Plan (21-033) 4 September 23, 2021 OS&P CR (Rural Commercial) Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage n/a 50% *Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. **Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 feet. The shoreland overlay district standards for setbacks, structure height and impervious surface apply to the area within 300 feet of the ordinary high-water level of Rush Creek. This appears to affect the rear of Lots 3-8 of the residential parcels on the northeast and Lot 6 on the southwest. The applicant must comply with the shoreland requirements in Section 1050.020 of the Zoning Ordinance, which requires a buffer adjacent to the creek and additional limitations on building height within the overlay district. Sidewalks and Trails The 2040 Comprehensive Plan has a proposed on-road trail shown along northern boundary of this property on County Road 10 and an existing trail on County Road 19. Hennepin County may require right of way to be dedicated for the County Road 19 trail. A proposed off-road trail is shown along Rush Creek. Staff recommends the trail be located on the west side of the creek from north to south property lines. City Council should discuss whether the trail should access directly from the County Road 10 on-road trail, whether it should provide an access to the residential properties through the ends of the cul-de- sacs, whether it should connect to the commercial area and whether a connection to the CR 19 trail should be planned. Transportation/Access The applicant is proposing three accesses with one serving the residential lots on the northeast, one serving the residential lots on the southwest and one serving the proposed commercial lots. The commercial lots will be accessed from the new proposed roadway extending from County Road 19, which will also provide the public works facility with access. All access locations and required improvements (including potential turn lanes) are subject to Hennepin County review and approval. Utilities The entire site is located outside the MUSA and will be served with well and septic. Ponding Stormwater ponding can be provided on site in compliance with local and state requirements. Floodplain The site has 100-year floodplain generally surrounding Rush Creek. The applicant will need to comply with the requirements of Section 1050.030 of the Zoning Ordinance Kariniemi Sketch Plan (21-033) 5 September 23, 2021 Wetlands There are a number of wetlands on site. The applicant must submit a wetland delineation for review and approval by the City as the LGU for the WCA. If wetland impacts are proposed additional applications for mitigation would be required. The applicant must comply with the wetland buffer and setback requirements in Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss the sketch plan and provide the applicant with informal comments. Any opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the City Council are considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. Attachments 1. Site Location Map 2. City Engineer’s Memo dated September 15, 2021 3. Applicant Narrative dated June 18, 2021 4. Sketch Plan dated September 13, 2021 5. Official Zoning Map 6. 2040 Future Land Use 7. Parks and Trails Plan 8. Natural Resource Inventory 9. Wetland Locations and Classifications Hennepin County N atural Resources Map Date: 9/14/2021 Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 1 inch = 800 feet Legend Wetlands Potential Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - NWI PID: 1811923110002Address: 23185 Co Rd No 10, Corcoran 55374 Owner: Willow 1 Llc Acres: 124.54 ¯ Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Project: Karineimi_Roehlke Concept Date: August 19, 2021 Updated September 16th Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on an updated review of the concept, however the majority of site issues remain the same. Some differences highlighted in yellow. 1. Concept Plan on Outlot A, Roehlke Addition by Otto and Associates, 6-18-21 9-13-21 a. Project shows nine new residential lots (access from CR 10), six residential lots (CR 19), three commercial lots (CR 19) and outlots. Comments: General: 1. Comments provided are high level comments based on the concept plan schematic provided. Additional comments should be anticipated on future submittals on the details of the development. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the proposed plans are subject to additional planning, zoning, public safety, and all other applicable codes and standards of the City of Corcoran, NPDES, WMO, Hennepin County, etc. 3. Adjacent site to northeast is historical site (Burschville School) and may receive additional attention and protection during construction. Plat: 1. The applicant shall show all drainage and utility easements and all platting requirements met per the City Code. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided as standard per City requirements. 2. Easements should be provided over all infrastructure used for the conveyance and treatment of stormwater. 3. Easements should be provided over any/all public infrastructure as applicable. 4. All existing easement, if any, should be provided to the City for review. Vacation of existing easements requires a City process. 5. Project shows a ROW connection to the east between Lots 3 and 4 Lots 1 and 2, City may require paving the street stub. a. ROW stub may need turnaround to meet City requirements. 6. Ghost plat parcel to east to ensure ROW is in proper location. 7. Access to Outlot A is provided. August 17, 2021 Kariniemi_Roehlke Concept Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 Transportation 1. County is permitting agency for CR 10 and CR 19. Turn lanes may be required and would be constructed under a City project with developer providing escrow. 2. County is permitting agency for access to commercial lots along CR 19. Current concept shows separate access adjacent to Public Works. 3. The need for fire access around any commercial buildings shall be determined by Public Safety at time of building permit. Stormwater 1. Stormwater management appears manageable for the residential lots. 2. FEMA floodplain exists and may affect the initial layout. 3. Stormwater management for commercial lot C-1 appears challenging due to wetland, required buffer, etc. 4. A stormwater management plan shall be provided to confirm that stormwater management is in accordance with City of Corcoran and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Standards. 5. The City’s Stormwater Guidelines shall be used for stormwater systems and modeling. 6. WMO typically requires that the model P8 or a similar calculation to demonstrate that the site meets the total phosphorous and total suspended solids reduction standards for all treatment practices. 7. Provide a hydraulic stormwater model to ensure that the proposed development meets all required rate control standards and does not adversely impact surrounding properties. 8. Adjacent D&D site will direct some drainage to its southeast corner, however this is minimal and will be reviewed for potential of erosion. Prior ComLink site directed more drainage to this location, so D&D has lessened the impact to Roehlke parcel. 9. If filtration is required by WMO for the site, the City strongly prefers a NURP pond with filter bench (offset to one side of the pond) be used with adequate maintenance access. 10. Incorporate any turn lane drainage (CR 10 and CR 19) into the site’s SWMP and WMO permitting. Fire Protection, Private Wells and Septics 1. Public Safety should review the need for any future fire protection within the property. 2. If not used with the current development, any wells which service the existing property should be abandoned by a licensed contractor. 3. Any existing septic system should be abandoned by a licensed contractor. End of Memo !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!! !!!!!!!!!! !! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!! ! !!! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!î î î s s òñð òñð ñ ñ ï ï î î s ñ ï ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STI E G R D WILLOW DRIVEHACKAMORE ROADTRAIL HAVEN ROADCAIN ROADOAKDALE D R STREHLER ROAD PI O N E E R T R COUNTY ROAD 117 ROLLLING HILLS RDLARKIN RD TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CITY OF GREENFIELDCITY OF MAPLE GROVESCOTT LAKEBECHTOLD ROAD$+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUS H C R E E K Official Zoning Map 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Zoning Districts: UR Urban Reserve RR Rural Residential RSF-1 Single Family Residential 1 RSF-2 Single Family Residential 2 RSF-3 Single and Two Family Residential 3 RMF-1 Medium Density Residential RMF-2 Mixed Residential RMF-3 High Density Residential MP Manufactured Home Park P-I Public / Institutional TCR Transitional Rural Commercial CR Rural Commercial C-1 Neighborhood Commercial C-2 Community Commercial DMU Downtown Mixed Use GMU General Mixed Use BP Business District I-1 Light Industrial PUD Planned Unit Development ï Cemetery î ChurchsGolf Course ñ Government Building òñð Public Park !! !!!2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area City Limit Open Water Shoreland Overlay District Adopted June 2011 19 10 30 116 101 50 19 10 ± Updated September 2020 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u sh CreekRushCreek South F o rk R u sh Creek SouthForkRu shC reekThe method and timing of regional wastewater service to be determined through future study. 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 4/28/2021 1/22/2023 1/22/2023 1/21/2021 10/2020 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: \\MSPFSV02\DesignDepot\Library\Software\GIS\Client\City of Corcoran\City wide maps\2040 Future Land Use.mxd Date: 6/16/2020 Time: 10:58:05 AM User: KShay Rural/Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public Parks/Open Space Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open Water Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Future Study Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers %Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 County Road 116Oakdale Dr B r i d l e Pa t hJeffreyLnAbileneLnTrail LnHunters Rdg County Road 30HeatherLn Pio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Robert LnHor s eshoeBendD r Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w yWillow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19ES t Homestead Trl Maple Hill RdCain RdRolling Hills RdSundanceRdCountry Rd Mohawk DrElm StLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d County R oad 1 1 7 Stie g R d Bechtold RdKalk RdSchutte Rd Meister RdFoxValleyDr M y s t iq u e DrHageDr 93rd Ave N Sc hut t e P lBrandywineRdChisholmT r lTessmer Rd HighBluffLnWinchesterTrl JubertLnR u shC reekRushCreek CountyDitchN u m b e rS ixteenCo u n t y Ditch N u mberThreeSouthFor k R u s h C r e e k NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP 79 City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C reekRushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthForkR u sh C r eek2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Natural Resource Inventory Areas.mxd Date: 1/7/2019 Time: 1:10:39 PM User: ShuJC0243 ^_Natural Community !(Rare Species OccurenceHigh Quality Natural Community Natural Plant Communities WetlandsWet PrairieEmergentShrubFloodplain ForestOpen WaterFlood Plain (Reed Canary Dominant) UplandsSavanna/PastureMaple/BasswoodOak ForestDisturbed WoodlandOld FieldMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-7Natural Resource Inventory Areas Note: Due to limitations of map scale, distribution and proportion of NaturalCommunity types within each colored area are approximate.Source:Natural Plant Communities, Rare Species Occurence (Natural Resource Inventory andManagement Plan, Nov. 2001, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates) 27 City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C reekRushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek South Fork RushCreekRushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Wetland Locations and Classifications.mxd Date: 1/7/2019 Time: 3:19:04 PM User: ShuJC0243 1 - Seasonally Flooded Basin or Flat2 - Wet Meadow3 - Shallow Marsh4 - Deep Marsh5 - Shallow Open Water6 - Shrub Swamp7 - Wooded Swamp8 - BogsMunicipal BoundaryStreamsParcel BoundariesLake/Open Water Map 1-11Wetland Locations and Classifications Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (Minnesota Departmentof Natural Resources 2009-2014) 35 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 9a. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Draft Solid Waste Collection Ordinance Action Required: Direction Summary: On May 13th the City Council provided feedback to staff regarding how to meet the requirements of Hennepin County to provide organics recycling to residents. Per the feed back to Council staff has drafted a solid waste collection ordinance. Ordinance requires each hauler to offer organics recycling to residents, provide for the City as an additional insured and limits hauling to one day a week to assist with road maintenance. The City attorney has reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed ordinance. Following Council input staff would draft the final ordinance for adoption in October and contact haulers to being the licensing process. Financial/Budget: A licensing fee would be proposed with adoption of the 2022 fee schedule. Options: 1.Direct provide direction the solid waste collection ordinance. Recommendation Staff would like feedback on the ordinance as proposed. Council Action: Provide feedback on the proposed ordinance. Attachments: 1.Draft Ordinance XXX. Solid Waste Collection Section XXX PURPOSE. The City Council finds that it is in the best interests of the health and safety of the residents of Corcoran to mandate that all residential and other generators of waste in the city provide for disposal thereof as set forth in this section. Disposal of waste in accordance with this section will help to ensure that waste is disposed of properly and promptly and will help to avoid the potential health and safety risks to residents and persons in the City caused by improper disposal or lack of disposal of waste. Further, the City finds that the licensing of solid waste haulers will assist the City in providing for the orderly and timely removal of waste. Section XXX. DEFINITIONS. The terms “construction debris”, “hazardous waste”, “mixed municipal solid waste”, “solid waste” and “yard waste” shall have the meanings given to them in Minnesota Statutes, sections 115A.03 and 116.06, unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary. Section XXX. SOLID WASTE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. Subd. 1 Storage. Each residential household is responsible for preventing the accumulation of solid waste on property occupied by the household. On the designated day of pickup, all solid waste must be set out in a designated container as described in Subd. 2 of this section for collection. Each household shall contain its solid waste in the designated container. Each container shall be placed as instructed by the collector along the street, sidewalk, or roadside for arranged collection. Each commercial, industrial, or institutional generator of solid waste shall prevent the accumulation of solid waste on their property. Such storage shall be in containers similar to those used by residential households, except that dumpsters with closefitting covers may be substituted. Subd. 2 Container Required. All solid waste shall be stored in containers which shall be watertight and shall have tight-fitting lids. All containers shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Any solid waste which by its size or bulk cannot be stored in a container shall be secured to the ground in such a manner to prevent the scattering of the waste by animals or wind. Section XXX. Collection and Removal of Solid Waste and Other Waste. Subd. 1 No person shall act as a solid waste hauler in the City without first obtaining the appropriate license issued by the City. Any person desiring a license to collect solid waste in the City shall submit a completed license application form along with the license fee and certificate of insurance required in Section X hereof. Subd. 2 Contracted Provisions. The city may enter into contracts for the collection of recyclable materials, from residential households or other generators. SEC. XXX REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENSE Subd 1. License Fee. Payment of the license fee as prescribed from time to time by the City Council shall be required prior to issuance of such license. Commented [JT1]: Are fees pro-rated for applicant’s who apply mid-year? Commented [JB2R1]: Yes Subd 2. Insurance. Before a solid waste hauler license shall be issued, the applicant shall carry and file insurance certificates with the City showing proof of workers’ compensation insurance (including employer’s liability insurance), commercial general liability insurance, and automobile liability insurance in accordance with the minimum requirements set forth below. The City, including its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents, shall be named as an additional insured in all such policies with the exception for workers' compensation insurance. 1. General Liability. The applicant agrees to maintain Commercial General Liability insurance in a minimum amount of $2,000,000 per occurrence; $4,000,000 annual aggregate. The policy shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, products-completed operations, limited pollution liability, personal injury, advertising injury, and contractually assumed liability. 2. Automobile Liability. The applicant shall maintain Business Automobile Liability Insurance, including owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles, with a minimum combined single liability limit of $2,000,000 per occurrence. 3. Workers’ Compensation. The applicant agrees to provide Workers’ Compensation insurance for all its employees in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota. The applicant shall also carry Employers’ Liability Coverage with minimum limits as follows: • $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease per employee • $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate • $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Accident The insurance requirements may be met through any combination of primary and umbrella/excess insurance. The applicant’s policies shall be primary insurance and non-contributory to any other valid and collectible insurance available to the City with respect to any claim arising out of the applicant’s performance under its license with the City. The applicant’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days’ advanced written notice to the City, or ten (10) days’ written notice for non-payment of premium. Subd 3. Minimum Services. Before a solid waste hauler license may be issued, an applicant shall provide the following minimum services at a price indicated on the application form: 1. Residential Dwellings. a. Weekly collection of garbage and other refuse to be disposed of at a proper waste disposal site. b. Weekly collection of yard waste to be disposed of according to law. c. Weekly collection of organics recyclables and waster to be disposed of according to law. d. Monthly collection of special waste to be disposed of according to law. e. Walk-up service for those customers who request it. 2. Multiple Residential Dwellings and Commercial Establishments. a. Weekly collection of garbage and other refuse to be disposed of at a licensed waste disposal site. b. Weekly collection of yard waste to be disposed of according to law. c. Weekly collection of organics recyclables and waster to be disposed of according to law. d. Monthly collection of special waste to be disposed of according to law. Subd 4. Schedule of Rates. Before a solid waste hauler license shall be issued, the applicant shall file a schedule of rates to be charged during the licensing period for which the application is made. Every licensee shall provide written notification to the City and the licensee’s customers at least sixty (60) days in advance of any change in rates to be implemented during the license period. SEC. XXX EXPIRATION OF LICENSE All licenses shall expire annually on December 31. SEC. XXX REVOCATION A licensee’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Section or any of the conditions attached to the license shall be grounds for license revocation without refund of the license fee. City action to revoke a license shall in no way limit the City’s authority to enforce the terms of this ordinance or exercise any other remedy available to the City at law or in equity. SEC. XXX HAULER’S EQUIPMENT Licensees shall use equipment so constructed that the solid waste material shall not leak or spill during transport to the disposal site. The equipment shall be kept clean and as free from offensive odors as possible and shall not be allowed to stand in any street stand in any street or public place longer than is necessary to collect the solid waste materials. The licensee shall also ensure that the collection site is left free of litter. SEC. XXX REPORT TO CITY Licensees shall submit to the City an annual report summarizing their business in the City on a form provided for such purpose. Upon request, licensee shall provide documentation supporting the data reported to the City. SEC. XXX COLLECTION REQUIRED Every single residential dwelling, multiple residential dwelling, commercial establishment and any other establishment generating solid waste shall make arrangements for the collection and disposal of solid wastes with a hauler licensed to do business in the City. Exceptions may be approved by the City Council for environmentally sound alternatives. SEC. XXX RESIDENTIAL DWELLING ZONES The City shall be divided into zones by the City Council for solid waste collection from residential dwellings. The entire City may be declared by the Council to be a single zone. Solid waste from those residential dwellings within each zone shall be collected on the same day. SEC. XXX DATE AND TIME OF COLLECTION Licensees may only collect solid waste on Tuesdays, unless the City Council specifically authorizes collection on another day. Council authorization for a different day of collection may be specific to a licensee(s), and the authorization shall not apply to other haulers, unless specifically permitted by the City Council. Collection of solid waste shall occur only during the following times: 7:00 a.m. -- 6:00 p.m. Section XXX. NON-COMPLIANCE. Subd. 1 Proper Disposal. No person shall deposit or allow the deposit of solid waste from any source in any place other than a sanitary landfill or other county-designated facility. The discarding of solid waste, construction debris, hazardous waste, yard waste or recyclable materials on any street, alley, drive, park, playground, or other public place or on any vacant lot shall constitutes violation of this section whether it is discarded by the individual upon whose premises the material originates or by some other person or collector, licensed or unlicensed. Subd. 2 Failure to Dispose. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to fail to dispose of solid waste or other waste which may be or which may accumulate upon property owned or occupied by the generator in a sanitary manner. Section XXX. ENFORCEMENT. Violations of the provisions of this ordinance shall be a misdemeanor. Further, any person who person or entity who performs or directs the performance of solid waste hauler activities within the City without obtaining and adhering to the terms of the license required by this Section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor Every day in violation shall constitute a separate offense. The city may also seek enforcement of this ordinance through civil judicial remedy including, but not limited to, injunction and mandamus. Any costs incurred by the City in enforcing the provisions of this ordinance, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, shall be the responsibility of the party in violation. Those such costs which are attributable to a specific property within the city and which are invoiced and remain unpaid may be assessed against the property in the same manner as are other unpaid fees. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10a. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens; Kevin Mattson Topic: City Park Water Connection Action Required: Approval Summary: The well at City Park has been poorly performing for several years and has recently failed. Water is needed for the park building as well as for flooding rinks and other maintenance items. Staff has investigated the following options: 1. Repair the old well a. Been attempted numerous times and no longer a viable option 2. Drill a new well a. The anticipated cost of drilling a new well exceeds $50,000. 3. Connect to the municipal water system a. The anticipated cost of connecting to the municipal system is $10,000 plus an additional connection fee of $1,360 to the City of Maple Grove. 4. Do nothing a. Park building is unusable for a warming house. b. Fairly significant impact to park maintenance operations c. Unknown timeline for when future City Park improvements may occur Staff believes this water service connection could be utilized in some capacity when the future City Park improvements move forward. Financial/Budget: No budget exists for these costs however staff feels it is a necessary project. At the suggestion of Mayor McKee, staff reviewed eligibility for ARPA funds and staff does believe this would be an eligible use of those funds. Options: 1. Authorize staff to initiate a project to connect City Park to the municipal water system in the amount of $11,360. 2. Authorize staff to initiate a project to drill a new well at City Park. 3. Decline. Recommendation: Staff recommends connecting to the municipal water system due to the costs. It is likely that a future well would be required for irrigation with the planned improvements to City Park. This municipal connection would also be needed in the future. Page 2 Council Action: Consider a motion authorize staff to initiate a project to connect City Park to the municipal water system in the amount of $11,360. Attachments: 1. City Park Building Water Service Quote - EJ Mayers, Inc. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10b. Council Meeting: September 23, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens; Kevin Mattson Topic: Schedule Work Session – Water Supply Planning Action Required: Schedule Work Session Summary: At the September 9th meeting the City Council authorized the preliminary design of the NE Corcoran Water Supply project. This project requires an upfront discussion on significant items such as type and location of water storage. Staff requests the Council schedule a work session at 5:30 pm on October 28, 2021 to continue these discussion. Financial/Budget: Costs for preparing and following up on work session items are included in the approved preliminary design project. Options: 1.Schedule a work session for 5:30 pm on October 28, 2021 2.Schedule a work session for a different day and time. Recommendation: Schedule a work session for 5:30 pm on October 28, 2021 Council Action: Mayor to schedule a work session for 5:30 pm on October 28, 2021 Attachments: None Added Agenda Item 11a. after closed Council closed session. Added Agenda Item 11b. after Council closed session. Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 MEMORANDUM 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net DATE September 15, 2021 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications Projects/Comments in blue italics are new The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1.Request for Rezoning, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance for Garages Too, LLC at 224010 Highway 55 (PID 32-119-23-44-0001) (city file 21-016). The applicant has requested approval to allow a mini storage/self-storage facility on the property. The City Council reviewed a concept plan earlier this year and indicated support. The application was reviewed at a Public Hearing at the August 5th Planning Commission and is scheduled for Council action on September 23rd. 2.Vacation of Cain Road ROW (city file 21-022). The City Council voted to commence the vacation process as requested by Michael Galbraith to remove an easement containing an unimproved portion of Cain Road adjacent to his property at 20700 70th Avenue. The item was reviewed at the August 12th meeting, but did not have a 4/5 vote and will be brought back to Council at a future date when a full City Council is available. 3.Sign Ordinance Amendment (city file 21-027). The City Council directed staff to prepare an update to the sign ordinance regarding campaign signs. The ordinance was reviewed at the August 26th City Council meeting and is expected to be adopted on September 23rd. 4.Preliminary Plat for “Bechtold Farm” at 10165 Bechtold Road (PID 05-119-23-44-0001 and 0811923110007) (city file no. 21-030). Skies Limit LLC has requested approval of a preliminary plat to create 12 lots on 115.61 acres. The item is currently incomplete and will be scheduled for meetings upon receipt of a complete application. 5.Amendments to the text of Chapter 82 (Nuisances) of the City Code (city file no. 21-032). At the June 10th meeting, Council directed staff to prepare amendments to ease storage restrictions from RVs, firewood and lots with more than one street frontage. The Council reviewed a draft ordinance amendment prepared by staff and the City Attorney. City Council directed staff to proceed with the draft ordinance with to allow a 25-foot front yard setback for up to two recreational vehicles in addition to modifying the language to also allow personal recreational vehicles and unoccupied trailers in the front yard. Staff was directed to proceed with a Public Hearing which is scheduled for the September 23rd meeting. 6.Kariniemi Sketch Plan for 23185 County Road 10 (PID 18-119-23-11-0002) (city file no. 21-033). The applicant has requested Council feedback on a concept to reguide/rezone part of the property from residential to commercial to create a mix of commercial and residential lots. This item was reviewed by the Council at the August 26th meeting, but the applicant has a new plan that will be presented at the September 23rd meeting. Agenda Item 12a. MEMORANDUM 2 7. Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Assembly Uses (city file 21-034). At the June 24th meeting, the City Council discussed removing assembly uses in low residential zoning districts within the MUSA. Staff was directed to proceed with a Public Hearing. The item was tabled at the August 5th Planning Commission meeting to September 2nd and two alternatives were presented for consideration. The Planning Commission tabled the item to the October 7th meeting. The item could then be placed on the October 28th City Council meeting. 8. Final Plat and PUD Final Plan for “Tavera 2nd Addition” (PID 35-119-23-41-0001 and 35-119-23- 41-0002) (city file no. 21-036). The final plat for phase 2 includes 46 single family homes. The application was reviewed by the Planning Commission on September 2nd and is scheduled for City Council action on September 23rd. 9. Final Plat and PUD Final Plan for “Amberley 1st Addition” and “Bellwether 6th Addition” (PID 01-119-23-34-0002) (city file no. 21-037). The application is for 62 lots in Bellwether 6th and 25 lots in Amberley 1st Addition. The application is scheduled for Planning Commission review on October 7th and City Council action on October 14th. 10. Certificate of Compliance for a Solar Array for Jonathon Stegbauer at 6697 Primrose Court (PID 36-119-23-13-0102) (City file no. 21-039). This item is being reviewed for completeness. The item may be administratively approved. 11. Allowed Home Occupation for Haxton Enterprises LLC DBA David's Lawn Service at 9800 Lily Pond Lane (PID 10-119-23-23-0014) (city file no. 21-040). The applicant has submitted a request for an allowed home occupation with no employees coming to the home. This is in response to a code enforcement complaint. Staff is reviewing for completeness. The item may be administratively approved. 12. Zoning Ordinance Amendment to update the Non-Conformities Section (city file no. 21-041). This is a City initiated effort to bring Section 1030.010 (Non-Conforming Buildings, Structures, Uses and Lots) of the Zoning Ordinance into compliance with State Statutes. This item is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing at the October 7th Planning Commission and action at the October 28th City Council meeting. The following projects were recently acted upon and will be closed out: 1. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building Sidewall Height at 6805 Rolling Hills Road (PID 32-119-23-11-0002) (city file 21-018). The applicant is requesting approval to exceed the sidewall height on a new accessory building in the rear yard. This item was reviewed at a public hearing at the June 3rd Planning Commission meeting where questions were raised about the section of the Zoning Ordinance regarding accessory buildings. This item was been placed on hold while the City considered a Zoning Ordinance text amendment. The Council approved this requested at the August 26th meeting. 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file no. 21-029). Staff is requesting that the City Council consider a text amendment to Section 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding accessory structures. The ordinance was amended in 2011 to allow landowners to apply for a conditional use permit to exceed the sidewall height for all properties regardless of parcel size. As part of the review of a recent application by Dave Dornsbach, the City Attorney was asked to review the ordinance and recommends changes before acting on the landowner request. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the August 5th Planning Commission and the City Council approved the item at the August 26th meeting. 3. Final Plat for “Gordon’s Country Estates First Addition” at 19701 Jackie Lane and 19717 Jackie Lane (PID 01-119-23-22-0024 and 01-119-23-22-0021) (city file no. 21-038). The final plat adjusts the lot line between two existing parcels and was approved by the City Council on August 26th. City of Corcoran 2021 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 13. October 14, 2021 – Charter Commission meeting at 5:30 (tentative) • 2022 Capital Improvement Plan – Order Equipment • Firearm ordinance update (shooting range, etc.) • 2021 Action Steps Update • Assessment Hearings – Appaloosa Woods/Corcoran Trail East & West • Recycling Proposal Review • Phone System Proposal • Planning Commissioner Appointment Process October 28, 2021 Work Session (tentative) • Water Supply Planning October 28, 2021 • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • 2021 Financial Performance Report • Amberly/Bellwether Final Plat and Final PUD Plan • Planning Commission Appointment • 2022 Employee Benefits • Zoning Amendment for Assembly Uses • Construction Hours Update (definition?) • Non-conforming lot update November 10, 2021 (Wednesday) • Public Hearing – Delinquent Fees • City Park Master Plan Update November 22, 2021 (Monday) • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • Financial Performance Report • City Administrator Performance Evaluation Distribution • Active Corcoran Planning Applications December 9, 2021 Work Session – 5:30 pm (not scheduled) • Tabletop Emergency Exercise December 9, 2021 • Public Hearing – 2022 Proposed Budget and Property Tax Levy • 2022 Full-time, Part-time, and Seasonal Wage Schedule Page 2 of 2 • 2022 General Fund Budget and Property Tax Levy • 2022 Fee Schedule • 2022 Water and Sanitary Sewer Budget • 2022 Goal Setting Date • Tort Liability Waiver December 22, 2021 (Wednesday) • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • Financial Performance Report • 2021 Year in Review • Closed Session – City Administrator Performance Evaluation • Active Corcoran Planning Applications •