Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-08-26 Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda August 26, 2021 - 7:00pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Commission Representatives* 5.Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6.Presentations/Recognitions 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of August 12, 2021 Work Session* b.Draft Minutes of August 12, 2021 Council Meeting* c.Financial Claims* d.Recreational Vehicle Ordinance* e.CSAH 101 & Future 105th Avenue Turn Lane Improvements - Award Bid* f.Final Plat for “Gordon’s Country Estates First Addition” at 19701 Jackie Lane and 19717 Jackie Lane* g.Amendment to Section 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Accessory Structures* h.Conditional Use Permit for Dave Dornsbach at 6805 Rolling Hills Road* i.Temporary Liquor License NW Area Jaycees Octoberfest 8.Planning Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Rezoning, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Preliminary Plat and Variance for Garages Too at 2240 State Hwy. 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive* b.Sketch Plan at 23185 County Road 10* c.Sign Ordinance Update – Campaign Signs* 9.Unfinished Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Corcoran Trail Street Improvements – Award Bid* 10.New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.City Council Appointment* 11.Staff Reports a.Active Corcoran Planning Applications* 12.2021 City Council Schedule* 13.Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.corcoranmn.gov. HYBRID MEETING OPTION AVAILABLE The public is invited to attend the regular Council meetings at City Hall. Meeting Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 882 0052 2104 Press *9 to speak during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88200522104 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 882 0052 2104 Participants can utilize the Raise Hand function to be recognized to speak during the Public Comment sections in the meeting. Participant video feeds will be muted. In-person comments will be received first, with the hybrid electronic means option following. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov The City of Corcoran will provide high-quality public services in a cost-effective, responsible, and professional manner in order to create a preferred environment to live, work, play, and conduct business. The City of Corcoran will become a vibrant, connected community while preserving its natural character and agricultural roots. The following values are fundamental to the City of Corcoran ’s success and the fulfillment of our mission: Honesty, Ethics, Integrity We believe that honesty, ethics, and integrity are the foundation blocks of public trust and confidence. Community Pride and Partnership We believe in creating a strong sense of community through partnerships with civic organizations, school districts, and local businesses. Efficient and Effective Service Delivery We believe providing services to residents and businesses in an efficient and effective manner makes government easier to work with and creates a business friendly environment. Community Safety We will protect the community by maintaining or improving safety through police and fire protection and by investing and maintaining the infrastructure of the City. Fiscal Responsibility We believe that the prudent stewardship and opportunistic investment of public funds is essential for confidence in government and to position the City for future success. Transparency We believe that open, honest, and proactive communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry. Processes and decision making should include opportunities to educate citizens and receive feedback. Responsible Decision Making We believe it is the responsibility of the City to address difficult issues now in order to avoid larger more difficult issues in the future. VISION VALUES CORE STRATEGIES MISSION •Enhance Corcoran’s sense of place and identity. •Provide diverse community amenities and recreational opportunities. •Maintain excellence in safety and security for our community. •Ensure high-quality, market-driven growth. •Provide high-quality, innovative municipal services. A DOPTED M ARCH 11, 2021 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 4. Council Meeting: August 26, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commission Representatives Action Required: None – Informational Summary: The advisory commission representatives for the August 26th Council meeting are as follows: •Planning Commission: Dean Jacobs •Parks and Trails Commission: John Dugan Financial/Budget: N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: N/A CITY OF CORCORAN 1 City Council Work Session Minutes August 12, 2021 – 5:30 pm The Corcoran City Council met on August 12, 2021, in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City Council meeting was held in person and the public was present in person and remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee, Council Bottema, Councilor Nichols, and Councilor Schultz were present. City Administrator Martens, Administrative Services Director Beise, Finance Manager Ung, and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk were present. Public Works Director Mattson was present through electronic means. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor McKee called the work session to order at 5:30 pm. 2.Draft 2022 Budget and Financial Management Plan City Administrator Martens outlined the 2022 Draft Budget and Financial Management Plan, levy and budget changes and noted Council direction to maintain current tax rate. City Administrator Martens reviewed the proposed water system expenditure, noting projected growth of 1,000 residential homes in existing developments. Council noted budget increase reflects inflation and general cost of services due to population growth. Council discussed city services and differences in property location for residents living on gravel roads versus paved roads and relief from higher taxes. Council reviewed tax rate reduction, staffing needs within departments, and maintaining the current tax rate or reducing. Council reviewed staffing needs and noted further review of the levy increase in relation to inflation and population growth to quantify increase in the levy. Council noted monetary advantage with growth in the City coinciding with a decrease in tax rate over time. Council and staff discussed the fee differences in sewer and water fees between SE Corcoran and NE Corcoran. Council and staff discussed long-term fleet equipment needs and phasing within the capital improvement plan, in-house staff transitioning from outsourced contractors, and water planning finance plan. Council and staff discussed commercial growth, projected residential growth, and debt and bond ratings. 3.Unscheduled Items No unscheduled business was heard. 4.Adjournment MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) Meeting adjourned at 6:36 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk Agenda Item: 7a. 1 CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes August 12, 2021 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on August 12, 2021, in Corcoran, Minnesota. The City Council meeting was held in person and the public was present in person and remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee, Council Bottema, Councilor Nichols, and Councilor Schultz were present. City Administrator Martens, Administrative Services Director Beise, Director of Public Safety Gottschalk, and City Planner Lindahl were present. Public Works Director Mattson was present through electronic means. 1.Call to Order/Roll Call Mayor McKee called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor McKee invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Martens noted exhibits added to the Resolution in item 8b. City Administrator Martens reviewed the public comment process for persons present at the meeting, and persons attending through electronic means. City Administrator Martens noted the closed session is scheduled for 9:00 pm to accommodate City consultant schedule, with agenda amendment as necessary for closed session. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to approve the agenda as modified. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) 4.Commission Representatives Mayor McKee noted Planning Commissioner Wu was present via electronic means, and Parks and Trails Commissioner Strehler was present at the meeting. Mayor McKee invited Commissioners Wu and Strehler to speak on relevant agenda items. 5.Open Forum (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person or telephonically during the public comment opportunity. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. 6.Presentations/Recognitions No presentations or recognitions were heard. 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of July 22, 2021, Council Meeting b.Financial Claims c.Land Use Map Amendments and Amendments to the Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines d.Southeast Corcoran 2020 Watermain Improvements – Pay Request 3 and Final Council asked item 7c., be pulled for further discussion. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Nichols to approve consent agenda items 7a., 7b., and 7d., as presented. Agenda Item: 7b. 2 Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) Council noted minor updates to land use maps and Southeast District Plan Design guidance, and suggested Planning Commission review and re-evaluation of low-density and high-density residential areas to a mixed residential category. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to approve consent agenda item 7c., as presented. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) 8. Planning Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate in-person or telephonically during the public comment opportunity. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. Michael Schommer, owner of the property of the Cook Lake Highlands project, supports the proposed development and noted property has been in his family since 1919. Mr. Schommer noted support of the development of Cook Lake Highlands, reviewed history of the sewer connection, and opined on Council in review of this type of development two years ago. Mr. Schommer opined on the benefits to Corcoran residents with the proposed development. Mary Tucker, 7402 Fir Lane, was in favor of the revised development plan, noted Ms. Hustad’s positive communication with residents, and supports the current plan and development as revised and presented. Lynn Alberts, 7490 Fir Lane, noted concerns of the three acres located adjacent to development will be rezoned Commercial, lighting used within parking lot and Apple Pointe building and removal of trees to accommodate the villa units. Mr. Alberts opined on the differences from the original development previously proposed to the current revised development plan. Steve Mueller, 7474 Fir Lane, noted loss of trees and concerns regarding villas, and does not support current proposal. Mr. Mueller opined on proposed development and restrictions within current zoning related to the proposed development. Mr. Mueller opined the memory care facility should be built in a commercial area of Corcoran not a mixed residential use area. Lloyd Nelson, 19755 Schutte Farm Road, noted support of proposed development and opined the memory care facility is a more preferred development for an entrance into Corcoran rather then a row of townhomes. a. Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Planned Unit Development Plan for “Cook Lake Highlands” City Planner Lindahl presented the report noting the new application presented includes changes to the original development based on neighborhood feedback and comments. City Planner Lindahl noted key changes include removal of apartment complex, additional landscape buffers, building restriction to single story villa homes, a 49-foot-high flat roof on Applewood Pointe with addition of kitchens to be considered individual housing units, and a dedication of Outlot C in the northwest corner of site as a public park per Parks and Trail Commission recommendation. City Planner Lindahl noted the vacant property to the west is zoned mixed residential and is not owned by the applicant. City Planner Lindahl reviewed changing the mixed residential zoning to commercial zoning would require a comprehensive plan amendment, and a 4/5 Council approval vote. City Planner Lindahl reviewed landscaping, park dedication items including proposed dedication of 8.36 acres on Outlot C, and options approving or denying the PUD. Council and staff discussed the trail connection with Maple Grove as another network of trails for residents to utilize. Council and staff reviewed the addition of kitchens in the memory care units and required density ranges. Council and staff discussed the Sho reland Overlay District and clarified the district is a state program and was established to protect streams and lakes in Minnesota, noting bodies of water that are regulated have changed over time. City Planner Lindahl noted Cook Highlands was not identified as shoreland in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan or City’s ordinance defining shoreland; however, within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the parcel was identified as a protected waterway. Council and staff discussed the current PUD and aspects protecting the approved uses within the development and parcel. Council discussed park dedication, 3 watershed credits for upland area of parks, and dry wetland definitions. City Planner Lindahl clarified no trees are slated from removal in Outlot C. Council and staff reviewed high-quality natural resources, rare species, and traffic pattern studies and intersections located near or within the development. Beth Hustad, Trek Development, thanked Council and stated appreciation for the community’s input on the project. Ms. Hustad referenced a professional land planner was hired by the owner in 2009 and noted the history of the land planner’s concept plan for the land referencing a consideration from Council at that time to guide the property mixed residential, with high-density and medium density recommendation. Ms. Hustad noted the current revisions to the development with exclusion of apartments, the intersection of Brockton Lane a costly expense, cooperation with the MET Council and City of Maple Grove in sharing in the intersection expense and noted potential density of the property with townhomes and apartments. Ms. Hustad discussed the shoreland district and noted the impervious issues existing on the site, the need for flexibility on building height, PUD comments are positive and, noted senior facilities have less traffic than an apartment complex would yield. Council and Ms. Hustad discussed appearance of buildings, and flexibility with details of architecture on commercial buildings. City Planner Lindahl noted the Resolution could include a condition specifying residential, architectural elements for the daycare building. Council reviewed trail access, creation of a secondary trail, snow storage options with elimination of one lot on cul -de-sac. City Planner Lindahl reviewed Resolution 2021-83 conditions regarding the loss of a single lot. Commissioner Wu reviewed Planning Commission’s concerns of building height, impervious surfaces, and building type was not conducive to consistency with Corcoran’s rural character. Council discussed original plan and revisions made in the current plan presented, referenced removal of 4-story apartment building, increase of tree preservation to 30 percent tree preservation, reviewed the current trail that was going to be eliminated remains off-road and extends into Maple Grove for an extended trail system for residents, and impervious surface decreased from 43 to 39 percent. Council noted with a townhouse- based model the impervious surface was estimated at 83 percent. Council discussed rezoning. Council discussed the uniqueness of the parcel and preservation of natural resources. Council noted the City has control over the PUD conditions in the case of future use of buildings. Council noted the current plan highlights a balanced development outcome for the parcel. Council and staff discussed building, parking lot lighting, and emergency low lighting on trail. City Planner Lindahl noted the Resolution could include a condition regarding direct-down lighting plan on trails. Council discussed monument signs and City Planner Lindahl noted monument sign location per City Code MOTION: made by McKee, seconded by Nichols adopting Ordinance 2021-426 Amending Title X (Zoning Ordinance) of the City Code to Classify Certain Land Located at 19220 County Road 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (City File 21-028). Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Schultz approving Resolution 2021-83 Findings of Fact for Rezoning for 19220 County Road 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (City File 21-028). Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by McKee approving Resolution 2021-84 Approving Preliminary Plat for “Cook Lake Highlands” at 19220 County Road 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (City File 21-028). Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Nichols approving Resolution 2021-85 Preliminary PUD Development Plan for “Cook Lake Highlands” for 19220 County Road 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (City File 21-028) with the following amendments: • Addition of condition 15a. stating: The daycare building shall be revised to incorporate residential design elements consistent with these standards. 4 • Addition of condition 16a stating: Light fixture height shall be minimized where possible to reduce impacts on adjacent properties. • Addition of condition 16b. stating: An updated lighting plan shall be submitted with the PUD final plan, including a footcandle map and final freestanding and building lighting plans. • Addition of condition 16c. stating: The final lighting plan shall be subject to City approval with the PUD final plan. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, and Nichols Nay: Schultz (Motion carried 3:1) 11. Closed Session a. Attorney-Client Privilege: Discuss Response to Action Filed by Housing First Minnesota Mayor McKee called a recess for closed session at 8:52 pm and stated, “Under the authority of Minn. Stat. § 13D.05 subd. 3(b) the City is permitted to close a meeting for attorney-client privilege to discuss pending litigation. The city council is going into closed session for that purpose to discuss response to the action filed by Housing First Minnesota.” Mayor McKee reconvened Council from closed session at 9:32 pm and stated, “In the closed session the city council discussed attorney client privilege items related to the action filed by Housing First Minnesota. Staff was provided direction.” Council requested item 10b. Night to United Resolution Accepting Donations be moved ahead of item 8b. 10. New Business (Public Comment Opportunity) d. Night to Unite Resolution Accepting Donations Recreation Coordinator Christensen Buck spoke on behalf of herself and Sergeant Ekenberg, and thanked Council for participating in the community event and noted 12 neighborhoods participated in the neighborhood parties. Recreation Coordinator Christensen Buck thanked contributors and businesses who donated to the event. Mayor McKee read a list of all sponsors and businesses who made donations to the event. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Bottema approving Resolution 2021-90 Recognizing the 2021 Night to Unite Event and Donations. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) 8. Planning Business Continued b. Public Hearing -- Cain Road Vacation City Administrator Martens reviewed request to vacate the portion of the Cain Road right-of-way adjacent to 20700 70th Avenue North. City Administrator Martens reviewed the adjacent property and the existing access road crossing through the right-of-way on the southeast corner of the proposed vacation portion, that would become part of the Galbraith’s property if the vacation were approved. City Administrator Martens noted future encroachment for a future driveway to the adjacent property would be located directly east from cul-de-sac and realign access to the property. Mayor McKee open the Public Hearing. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the Public Hearing opportunity. MOTION: made Nichols, seconded by Schultz to close the public hearing Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Schultz approving Resolution 2021-89 Vacation of the Northern Portion of the Cain Road Right-of-Way Adjacent to 20700 70th Avenue North and the Adjacent Drainage and Utility Easements Within the “Wagon Rest” Plat. (PID 27-119-23-44-0022) (City File 21- 5 022) Council discussed allowing adjacent property opportunity to cover costs with re-platting the property to accommodate request by both property owners. Michael Galbraith, 20700 70th Avenue North, spoke in support of Council approval of vacation as presented, and noted he and the adjacent neighbor could work out the access agreement, or adjacent neighbor has the option to construct a new driveway. Mr. Galbraith noted he would allow deeded access to adjacent neighbor with approval of vacation. Council inquired if angled driveways are acceptable within current code. City Administrator Martens noted the access is moving at an angle through a City right-of-way, noting staff recommendation was to access the property east of cul-de-sac through the wooded area of property. Council asked what the benefit to the City is by requiring property owner to build driveway in this manner. St aff and Council discussed City driveway easements in place within City right-of-way. Council discussed tabling the item for landowners to review and come to an agreement regarding existing access. Council discussed if a carve out for an easement for the benefit of a private landowner is an acceptable action on a City- created easement, and if repealing part of the easement to accommodate a building is acceptable. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, and Schultz Nay: Nichols (Motion carried 3:1) c. Grading Request for Amberley/Bellwether City Administrator Martens outlined the grading request for Amberley/Bellwether for site grading and trunk sewer installation in advance of final plat approval with contingencies of financial guarantees, watershed/wetland approvals, tree preservation plan, etc. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by McKee approving stringent agreement contingent upon securing a financial guarantee, watershed and wetland approvals, trees preservation plan, any other applicable permits, approval of property owner, and pre-construction approval meeting. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, and Schultz Nay: Abstain: Nichols (Motion carried 3:0:1) 9. Unfinished Business a. Improvement Hearing – City Center Drive and 79th Place Improvements Project City Administrator Martens reviewed City Center Drive and 79th Place improvements, the feasibility study from the July 8 meeting, the proposed assessments for the four properties impacted, and the future application from St. Therese. Mayor McKee opened the public hearing. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in pu blic hearing. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Nichols to close the public hearing. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) Council discussed and agreed to defer assessment to sale of property on the two existing residential properties impacted and defer further action until an application is received from St. Therese. b. Dust Control Billing City Administrator Martens noted deferred Council discussion on dust control billing and public comment. Dean Vehrenkamp, 9310 Bechtold Road, opined on benefits to residents of dust control, as well as the benefits to maintenance benefits by applying dust control to gravel road. Mr. Vehrenkamp does not benefit from and does not support dust control fees to residents, and opined maintena nce of gravel roads are like maintenance of paved roads, and residents pay taxes for general road maintenance. Council discussed dust control and the process of binding gravel to strengthen the road. Council and staff reviewed the current budget. Council discussed the maintenance aspect of all roads in Corcoran and including future dust control cost in road maintenance for the 2022 budget and invoicing the current dust control to residents in 2021. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by McKee to invoice residents for dust control for 2021 costs and review dust control costs for the 2022 budget . 6 Voting Aye: McKee and Schultz Nay: Nichols Abstain: Bottema (Motion carried 2:1:1) 10. New Business (Public Comment Opportunity) City Administrator Martens noted no in-person comments were received. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents to participated in the public comment opportunity. a. NTIA Broadband Partnership Grant Application City Administrator Martens reviewed the opportunity to apply for a broadband partnership grant with Comcast, noting the $6.7 million project will serve approximately 496 properties. City Administrator Martens outlined grant approval would allow the City $5.7 million in Federal grants, with Comcast participation of $1.5 million, with no cost contribution required by Corcoran. Council and staff discussed commitment with Comcast and resident options regarding cable availability. Council discussed partnering with a private entity for future services provided only through one private entity. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by McKee to authorize city administrator to complete the NTIA Broadband Partnership Grant Application due August 17. Council Voting Aye: McKee, Nichols, and Schultz Nay: Bottema (Motion carried 3:1) b. Request for Funds -- Cross City Administrator Martens reviewed request for financial assistance by Cross Funds in the amount of $84,000. MOTION: made by Bottema to approve funds for financial assistance for Cross Funds. Motion fails for lack of second. Council and staff discussed the specific rules regarding charitable giving by cities, noting specific funding like ARPA allows for charitable contributions. c. Open Book Meeting Council noted Open Book Meetings and Council review of assessed values on properties, Council participation in review of assessed values of properties, and appeals process to Hennepin County. Council noted resident appealing to the assessor on property value and debated the conflict of interest with the assessor also setting the property valuation. Staff and Council reviewed the process of Local Board of Equalization, Open Book Meetings, Council review and participation with property owners disagreeing with property value. Item was removed from agenda until further Council action is requested. d. Work Session Schedule City Administrator Martens reviewed the upcoming Council Work Session schedules and noted September 9 for budget review, and September 23 for fire service review. Mayor McKee called Work Session meetings on September 9 and September 23. 11. Staff Reports a. Active Corcoran Planning Applications; Council received report. 12. 2021 City Council Schedule Mayor McKee noted a busy upcoming Council schedule. 13. Adjournment MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) Meeting adjourned at 10:40 pm. Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk Agenda Item: 7c. Council Meeting Date: 8/26/2021 FINANCIAL CLAIMS Prepared By:Maggie Ung CHECK RANGE Agenda Item: FUND #500 ESCROW CLAIMS Amount Project name $0.00 Total Fund #500 =-$ (See attached Payments Detail) Agenda Item: 7c. Paid to SEE THE REGISTER FOR #500 CLAIMS Total 7c.ALL OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMS 449,824.64$ (See attached Check Detail Register) Total Checks 449,824.64$ Total of Auto Deductions 104,883.91$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL 554,708.55$ Date Paid to Amount 8/6/2021 RevTrak 1,035.51$ Credit Card Fees 8/12/2021 ADP 58,705.94$ Net Payroll 8/12/2021 ADP 23,868.48$ Payroll taxes 8/16/2021 MN PERA 15,196.21$ Pension Plan 7/27/2021 Affordable Display 151.88$ Night to Unite Supplies 8/6/2021 Hennepin County 5,057.71$ Night to Unite Event 8/10/2021 ZOOM 16.11$ Zoom for Council Meetings 8/10/2021 ZOOM 69.88$ Zoom for Council Meetings 8/10/2021 Assn of MN Emergency Mgrs 200.00$ Police Dues and Membership Fee 8/11/2021 FLEETIO.COM 30.00$ PD Software 8/11/2021 MNGFOA 70.00$ Finance Membership Fee 8/13/2021 MNGFOA 230.00$ MNGFOA Conference - Finance Training 8/16/2021 TARGET 00021931 79.47$ Public Work Supplies 8/16/2021 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST 114.30$ Permit Training 8/18/2021 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST 58.42$ Permit Training Total 104,883.91$ Auto Deductions / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursements *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 1 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice 10100 Farmers State Bank ACME TOOLSPaid Chk# 031075 8/26/2021 $31.90 STIHL SUMMER BAR OILE 100-43100-225 Landscape/Ditch Materials 9036260 Total ACME TOOLS $31.90 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESPaid Chk# 031076 8/26/2021 $146.10 PD SUPPLIESE 100-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 141W-WW4G- $43.12 PD SUPPLIESE 100-42100-209 Police Reserves 141W-WW4G- $10.42 PD SUPPLIESE 100-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 141W-WW4G- $72.28 PD TENNIS BALLSE 202-42100-213 Police K9 166F-KWN4-1 $154.53 GARAGE DOOR REMOTEE 100-42100-223 Building Repair Supplies 1DPK-4XCT-1 $59.36 PD HDMI CABLEE 100-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 1K3G-93TT-6G $56.93 BADGE HOLDERSE 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 1WPG-G4YH- $31.99 PD COMPUTER CABLESE 100-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 1XCK-4JCW-D $80.76 PD SUPPLIESE 100-42100-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) 1Y7N-RJHT-J $80.76 PD SUPPLIESE 100-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 1Y7N-RJHT-J Total AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES $736.25 B&B SHEET METAL & ROOFINGPaid Chk# 031077 8/26/2021 $48,695.00 Insurance Claim/BuildingsE 100-41941-811 Storm Damage Insurance Refund 58651 Total B&B SHEET METAL & ROOFING $48,695.00 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANYPaid Chk# 031078 8/26/2021 $934.40 GASOLINEE 100-43100-212 Motor Fuels 1859452 $1,880.63 SQUAD FUELE 100-42100-212 Motor Fuels 1861193 Total BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY $2,815.03 BENNETT, LEEPaid Chk# 031079 8/26/2021 $1,000.00 ESCROW REFUND GR19-008; 10208 HAGE DRIVEE 100-41910-431 Misc Expense Total BENNETT, LEE $1,000.00 BERGAN KDVPaid Chk# 031080 8/26/2021 $1,875.00 ACCOUNTING OUTSOURCED SERVICESE 100-41941-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1138077 Total BERGAN KDV $1,875.00 BIFFS INC.Paid Chk# 031081 8/26/2021 $174.00 PORTERE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) W826421 $76.50 PORTERE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) W826422 $250.50 PORTERE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) W826423 $76.50 PORTERE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) W826424 $174.00 PORTERE 100-45200-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) W826425 Total BIFFS INC.$751.50 BOBCAT OF BRAINERDPaid Chk# 031082 8/26/2021 $93.50 DOOR GLASS M SERIESE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 01-28632 Total BOBCAT OF BRAINERD $93.50 BSN SPORTSPaid Chk# 031083 8/26/2021 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 2 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice $298.40 Little LeagueE 100-45200-261 Recreation Programming 913258082 Total BSN SPORTS $298.40 CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTONPaid Chk# 031084 8/26/2021 $21.03 NATURAL GASE 100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 5754177-3 Total CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON $21.03 COMCAST- 902943336Paid Chk# 031085 8/26/2021 $111.85 LAND LINEE 100-41941-321 Telephone $111.86 LAND LINEE 100-42100-321 Telephone $111.86 LAND LINEE 100-43100-321 Telephone Total COMCAST- 902943336 $335.57 COMCAST-INTERNETPaid Chk# 031086 8/26/2021 $144.17 INTERNETE 100-41941-321 Telephone 08052021 $144.18 PD INTERNETE 100-42100-321 Telephone 08052021 Total COMCAST-INTERNET $288.35 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHPaid Chk# 031087 8/26/2021 $1,453.50 SERVICE SUPPORTE 100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 313057 $832.00 OFFICE 365 GOV'T FEEE 100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 313549 $595.00 OFFICE 365 GOV'T FEEE 100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 313784 $4,215.00 OFFICE 365 GOV'T FEEE 100-41951-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 313995 Total COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH $7,095.50 CROW RIVER NEWSPaid Chk# 031088 8/26/2021 $55.95 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTIONE 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) CRW-110263 Total CROW RIVER NEWS $55.95 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATERPaid Chk# 031089 8/26/2021 $106.05 OFFICE WATERE 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 10099705485- $36.76 PD WATER COOLERE 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 114X81575108 Total CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER $142.81 D.J.V. LABEL & PACKAGINGPaid Chk# 031090 8/26/2021 $666.00 BADGE LABELE 201-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 66538 Total D.J.V. LABEL & PACKAGING $666.00 DELTA DENTALPaid Chk# 031091 8/26/2021 $101.35 DENTAL INSURANCEE 100-41400-131 Employer Paid Health CNS00007667 $122.80 DENTAL INSURANCEE 100-42100-131 Employer Paid Health CNS00007667 $101.35 DENTAL INSURANCEE 100-42102-131 Employer Paid Health CNS00007667 $156.70 DENTAL INSURANCEE 100-43100-131 Employer Paid Health CNS00007667 $63.00 DENTAL INSURANCE - HAMILTONG 100-20205 Reimbursements CNS00007667 $30.70 DENTAL INSURANCEE 100-45200-131 Employer Paid Health CNS00007667 $30.70 DENTAL INSURANCEE 100-41300-131 Employer Paid Health CNS00007667 Total DELTA DENTAL $606.60 ELECTRIC PUMPPaid Chk# 031092 8/26/2021 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 3 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice $150.00 LIFT REPAIRE 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (GENERAL 0071533-IN Total ELECTRIC PUMP $150.00 EXPRESS FIRE PROTECTIONPaid Chk# 031093 8/26/2021 $8,230.00 FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER REPLACEMENTE 411-43100-520 Buildings and Structures 10313 Total EXPRESS FIRE PROTECTION $8,230.00 FERGUSON WATERWORKSPaid Chk# 031094 8/26/2021 $513.24 WATER METERSE 601-49400-215 Water Meters 0479494 Total FERGUSON WATERWORKS $513.24 GOPHER STATE ONE CALLPaid Chk# 031095 8/26/2021 $218.70 SERVICEE 601-49400-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 1070310 $218.70 SERVICEE 602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 1070310 Total GOPHER STATE ONE CALL $437.40 GOTTSCHALK, MATTPaid Chk# 031096 8/26/2021 $2,100.00 FSA DEPENDENT CAREG 100-21709 Dependent Care FSA Withhold 081321 Total GOTTSCHALK, MATT $2,100.00 GRAINGERPaid Chk# 031097 8/26/2021 $64.28 EAR PLUGSE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 9013440665 Total GRAINGER $64.28 GREGORY, ERICPaid Chk# 031098 8/26/2021 $220.99 BOOT ALLOWANCEE 100-43100-417 Uniforms 080921 Total GREGORY, ERIC $220.99 HENN CO SHERIFF-MC131Paid Chk# 031099 8/26/2021 $75.00 PD BookingE 100-42100-301 Prisoner 1000169457 Total HENN CO SHERIFF-MC131 $75.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY ARPaid Chk# 031100 8/26/2021 $5.00 RECORDED DOCUMENTSE 100-41910-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 1000170023 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY AR $5.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY ASSESSORPaid Chk# 031101 8/26/2021 $94,000.00 ASSESSMENT FEESE 100-41550-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1000169411 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY ASSESSOR $94,000.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECHPaid Chk# 031102 8/26/2021 $1,446.73 PD RADIO FEEE 100-42100-323 Radio Units 1000169479 $220.95 RADIO FEEE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 1000169546 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY INFO TECH $1,667.68 HOLIDAY COMPANIESPaid Chk# 031103 8/26/2021 $60.00 HOLIDAY CARD 1400-003-788-415E 100-42100-212 Motor Fuels Total HOLIDAY COMPANIES $60.00 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 4 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice INTEGRATED PROTECTION SYSTEMSPaid Chk# 031104 8/26/2021 $775.00 PIPE WORKE 100-41951-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 75821 Total INTEGRATED PROTECTION SYSTEMS $775.00 LANDFORMPaid Chk# 031105 8/26/2021 $35.50 RAVINIA 9TH FP/FINAL PUD 17-042G 500-20445 Ravinia 9th FP and PUD 17-042 31965 $71.00 LITHGOW AUTO CUP 19-013G 500-20475 Lithgow Auto CUP/SP 19-013 31966 $177.50 RUSH CREEK RESERVE FP/ FPUD 20-030G 500-20458 Rush Creek Run FP 18-026 31967 $26.25 RAVINIA 15TH FP/PUD AMEND AND FINAL PUD 20-033G 500-20469 Rav 11-13 18-040, 19-002 & 012 31967 $700.75 TAVERA FP AND FPUD 20-042G 500-20332 Lennar Tavera Development 31967 $142.00 REFUGE RUSH CREEK VACATION 21-005G 500-20459 Refuge of Rush Creek FP 18-028 31988 $1,037.50 RESIDENTIAL ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 21-011E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 31988 $316.50 D&D SERVICE CUP SP AND VAR 21-012G 500-20227 D&D Service CUP SP VAR 21-012 31988 $71.00 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT-WESTSIDEG 500-20353 Westside Tire 31988 $3,593.50 GARAGES RZ, VAR, SP & CUP 21-016G 500-20228 Garages RZ, VAR, SP/CUP 21-016 31988 $1,420.00 AMBERLEY AND BELLWETHER RZ PP PUD 21-017G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 31988 $213.00 ZONING AND LAND USE MAP UPDATE 21-020E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 31988 $816.50 FRANZEN FINAL PLAT 21-021G 500-20221 Franzen Minor Subd #20-049 31988 $35.50 CAIN ROAD VACATION 21-022G 500-20362 Cain Road 31988 $1,239.50 TAVERA PUD AMENDMENT 21-023G 500-20332 Lennar Tavera Development 31988 $35.50 MAGNAN DEV APPEAL 21-024G 500-20356 Magnan Dev Rights 31988 $1,035.00 GORDONS COUNTRY ESTATES PP VAR VAC 21-025G 500-20357 Gordon Country Estates 31988 $1,423.50 COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS 21-028G 500-20490 Cook Lake - Schommer 31988 $52.50 ACCESSORY BUILDING AMENDMENTE 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 31988 $3,455.00 BECHTOLD FARM PP 21-030G 500-20361 Bechtold Farm 31988 $1,458.50 NUISSANCE ORDINANCE UPDATES 20-032E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 31988 $210.00 KARINIEMI ROEHLKE SKETCH 20-033G 500-20484 Kariniemi WCA 31988 $35.50 ZONING AMENDMENT FOR ASSEMBLY USES 21-034E 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 31988 $517.25 TMOBILE ANTENNA ADMIN PERMIT 21-035E 100-42400-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 31988 $71.00 TAVERA 2ND ADD FP AND FPUD 21-036G 500-20332 Lennar Tavera Development 31988 $142.00 AMBERLEY & BELLWETHER 6TH FP AND FPUDG 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 31988 $3,372.50 CITY BUSINESSE 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 31988 $1,848.00 CODE ENFORCEMENTE 100-41920-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 31988 $200.00 CITY MEETINGSE 100-41910-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 31988 Total LANDFORM $23,752.25 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TRSTPaid Chk# 031106 8/26/2021 $500.00 CLAIM 00101737E 100-42100-364 Workers Comp Insurance 1001014 $500.00 CLAIM 00460338E 100-43100-364 Workers Comp Insurance 1001014 $73.10 CLAIM 00459809E 100-43100-364 Workers Comp Insurance 1001014 Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSUR.TRST $1,073.10 LENNEMANN, COLEPaid Chk# 031107 8/26/2021 $211.52 3M FULL FACE MASKE 100-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 081221 Total LENNEMANN, COLE $211.52 MAPLE GROVE, CITY OFPaid Chk# 031108 8/26/2021 $62,098.72 APRIL, MAY, JUNE WATER USAGEE 601-49400-310 Other Professional Services 21021 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 5 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice Total MAPLE GROVE, CITY OF $62,098.72 MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW, LLCPaid Chk# 031109 8/26/2021 $220.00 PD HEALTH CHECK-INE 100-41941-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1385 Total MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW, LLC $220.00 MCDONOUGH, MARKPaid Chk# 031110 8/26/2021 $5,000.00 PATROL & NARCOTIC TRAININGE 202-42100-213 Police K9 21-019 Total MCDONOUGH, MARK $5,000.00 MENARDS MAPLE GROVEPaid Chk# 031111 8/26/2021 $78.74 TOILET BOLTSET/WAX RINGE 100-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies 49 Total MENARDS MAPLE GROVE $78.74 METRO SALES INCPaid Chk# 031112 8/26/2021 $2,290.00 COPIER CONTRACTE 100-41951-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) INV1858734 $950.70 COPIER CONTRACTE 100-41130-351 Newsletter Expenses INV1858734 Total METRO SALES INC $3,240.70 MILLER CHEVROLETPaid Chk# 031113 8/26/2021 $38.46 FILTERE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 171286 Total MILLER CHEVROLET $38.46 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTHPaid Chk# 031114 8/26/2021 $1,630.53 WATER CONNECTION FEEE 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1270075-Q3 Total MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH $1,630.53 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHPaid Chk# 031115 8/26/2021 $1,173.00 SERVICEE 100-42100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 374045 otal MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH $1,173.00 MN BCAPaid Chk# 031116 8/26/2021 $64.00 BACKGROUND CHECKE 100-42100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) Total MN BCA $64.00 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCPaid Chk# 031117 8/26/2021 $114.00 PERMITS TO ACQUIRE HANDGUNE 100-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 12080 Total MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC $114.00 MN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETYPaid Chk# 031118 8/26/2021 $295.25 2018 FORD XPL REGISTRATIONE 100-42100-212 Motor Fuels 00-030031774 otal MN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY $295.25 MN HIGHWAY SAFETY & RESEARCHPaid Chk# 031119 8/26/2021 $455.00 PD CLASS FEEE 100-42100-208 Training and Instruction 629430-8751 Total MN HIGHWAY SAFETY & RESEARCH $455.00 MOTLEY AUTO SERVICEPaid Chk# 031120 8/26/2021 $1,293.00 PD VEHICLE MAINTENANCEE 100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 6065 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 6 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice Total MOTLEY AUTO SERVICE $1,293.00 NAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORANPaid Chk# 031121 8/26/2021 $31.18 PD Trailer BallE 100-42100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 366719 Total NAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORAN $31.18 NAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORANPaid Chk# 031122 8/26/2021 $50.09 DISC PADE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 363563 $20.79 BRG PROTE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 363563 Total NAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORAN $70.88 NEXTERAPaid Chk# 031123 8/26/2021 $3,202.27 12 MONTH INTERNET SERVICEE 100-43100-321 Telephone 105247 Total NEXTERA $3,202.27 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INCPaid Chk# 031124 8/26/2021 $1,890.00 FINANCIAL MGMT PLANE 100-41900-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 6735 Total NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC $1,890.00 OFFICE DEPOTPaid Chk# 031125 8/26/2021 $50.91 OFFICE SUPPLIESE 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 184255839002 Total OFFICE DEPOT $50.91 PATNODE ELECTRICPaid Chk# 031126 8/26/2021 $425.00 RECEPTACLESE 416-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 2573 Total PATNODE ELECTRIC $425.00 PEARSON BROS., INC.Paid Chk# 031127 8/26/2021 $34,402.50 PARKING LOT SEAL COAT/BITUMINOUS MATERIALE 100-43100-222 Seal Coating 5391 Total PEARSON BROS., INC.$34,402.50 ROGERS FIRE DEPARTMENTPaid Chk# 031128 8/26/2021 $34,693.51 3RD Qtr 2021 Fire ProtectionE 100-42200-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 0034282 Total ROGERS FIRE DEPARTMENT $34,693.51 SYMBOL ARTSPaid Chk# 031129 8/26/2021 $497.50 STATE SEALE 100-42100-417 Uniforms 0393858 Total SYMBOL ARTS $497.50 TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVEPaid Chk# 031130 8/26/2021 $75.00 PD INVESTIGATIONSE 100-42100-218 Investigations 202107-1 Total TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE $75.00 TRUAX PATIENT SERVICESPaid Chk# 031131 8/26/2021 $525.00 Narcam Nasal Spray PD SuppliesE 100-42100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 2339 Total TRUAX PATIENT SERVICES $525.00 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC.Paid Chk# 031132 8/26/2021 $8,160.39 LENNAR DEVELOPMENTG 500-20335 Lennar Eng Plan Review/Modific 1817799 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 7 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice $466.00 HACKAMORE ROAD IMPROVEMENTE 419-43100-303 Engineering Fees 1817800 $732.50 WETLANDSE 427-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 1817801 $1,277.16 SURVEYINGE 427-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 1817801 $130.00 DESIGNE 427-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 1817801 $2,739.40 CONSTRUCTIONE 427-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 1817801 $784.16 BASS LAKE CROSSINGG 500-20438 Bass Lk CR M/I HomeEngineering 1817803 $466.82 BASS LAKE ESTATESG 500-20423 Bass Lake Est Skch PUD 17-015 1817803 $47.12 COLD STORAGE CROSSINGSG 500-20423 Bass Lake Est Skch PUD 17-015 1817803 $162.00 REFUGE AT RUSH CREEK WETLAND BANKG 500-20459 Refuge of Rush Creek FP 18-028 1817803 $93.00 SCHERBER HWY 55G 500-20477 Scherber CR30 WCA LGU 1817803 $486.00 FRANZEN PRELIMINARY PLATG 500-20221 Franzen Minor Subd #20-049 1817803 $2,891.50 D&DG 500-20227 D&D Service CUP SP VAR 21-012 1817803 $1,165.18 KARINEIMI ROLLING HILLSG 500-20497 Kariniemi PP 20-016 1817803 $2,072.75 BECHTOLD FARM DEVELOPMENTG 500-20361 Bechtold Farm 1817803 $422.50 WESTSIDE ESCROWG 500-20353 Westside Tire 1817803 $108.00 GORDON ESTATE ESCROWG 500-20357 Gordon Country Estates 1817803 $9,286.27 PULTE DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTUREG 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 1817804 $165.50 2020 SE CORCORAN TRUNK WATERMAINE 601-49400-303 Engineering Fees 1817805 $1,714.00 DOWNTOWN RETROFITE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1817806 $1,462.50 RESIDENT ITEMSE 100-43170-299 Watershed LGU 1817807 $742.50 ERNIE MAYER VIOLATIONE 100-43170-299 Watershed LGU 1817807 $420.00 19701 JACKIE LANEG 500-20200 Accounts Payable 1817807 $270.00 20240 HACKAMORE ROADG 500-20200 Accounts Payable 1817807 $171.50 EBERT BECHTOLD ROADG 500-20200 Accounts Payable 1817807 $630.00 6330 SNYDER ROADG 500-20200 Accounts Payable 1817807 $817.50 WAWRAG 500-20200 Accounts Payable 1817807 $135.00 66TH/GLEASONG 500-20200 Accounts Payable 1817807 $630.00 BECHTOLD ROAD (SKIES LIMIT)G 500-20200 Accounts Payable 1817807 $403.00 SCHERBER PROPERTYG 500-20200 Accounts Payable 1817807 $60.00 VAN BLAIRICOMG 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 1817807 $20.16 M/I HOMESG 500-20214 M/I Homes WCA 1817807 $622.50 RUSH CREEK WETLAND BANKG 500-20488 Rush Creek Reserve 1817807 $210.00 FRANZEN WETLAND DELINEATIONG 500-20232 Franzen Wetland Delineation 1817807 $325.00 MASTER PLAN ENGINEERINGE 602-49450-303 Engineering Fees 1817808 $394.50 ST THERESEG 500-20471 St. Therese Sketch Plan 19-006 1817809 $1,581.25 COOK LAKEG 500-20490 Cook Lake - Schommer 1817810 $4,700.25 TAVERA_LENNARG 500-20332 Lennar Tavera Development 1817811 $556.75 NELSON TRUCKINGG 500-20482 Nelson Sketch Plan 19-023 1817812 $24.50 BASS LAKE CROSSING BUILDING PERMIT SURV REVIEW E 100-42400-303 Engineering Fees 1817813 $175.50 PULTE UTILITY CONNNECTIONE 601-49400-234 Inspections 1817813 $175.50 PULTE UTILITY CONNECTIONE 602-49450-234 Inspections 1817813 $612.50 PULTE BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY REVIEWE 100-42400-303 Engineering Fees 1817813 $249.00 RAVINIA UTILITY CONNECTIONE 601-49400-234 Inspections 1817813 $249.00 RAVINIA UTILITY CONNECTIONE 602-49450-234 Inspections 1817813 $245.00 RAVINIA BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY REVIEWE 100-42400-303 Engineering Fees 1817813 $34.50 BASS LAKE CROSSING UTILITY CONNECTIONE 601-49400-234 Inspections 1817813 $34.50 BASS LAKE CROSSING UTILITY CONNECTIONE 602-49450-234 Inspections 1817813 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 8 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice $224.00 BUILDING PERMIT UTILITY CONNECTIONE 100-42400-303 Engineering Fees 1817813 $12.25 BUILDING PERMIT GRADING INSPECTIONE 601-49400-234 Inspections 1817813 $12.25 BUILDING PERMIT GRADING INSPECTIONE 602-49450-234 Inspections 1817813 $3,571.68 RUSH CREEK RESERVESG 500-20488 Rush Creek Reserve 1817814 $10,631.50 NELSON TRUCKING CSAH 101 TURN LANESG 500-20482 Nelson Sketch Plan 19-023 1817815 $840.50 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICESE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1817817 $1,576.50 APPALOOSA WOODS ENGINEER'S REPORTG 500-20204 Appaloosa Woods Feasibility 1817817 $3,227.00 CITY CENTER DRIVE FEASBILITY STUDYE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1817819 $3,239.00 RUSH CREEK TURN LANESG 500-20488 Rush Creek Reserve 1817820 $580.50 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT DESIGNE 100-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1817822 $20,121.75 CORCORAN TRAIL IMPROVEMENTSE 429-43170-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 1817823 $973.00 ST THERESE ENGINEERING ASSISTANCEG 500-20471 St. Therese Sketch Plan 19-006 1817824 Total WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC.$94,332.59 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIREPaid Chk# 031133 8/26/2021 $39.24 TIRESE 100-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) 887895 Total WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $39.24 WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECTPaid Chk# 031134 8/26/2021 $15.10 Bridle/Gleason: 150-1690-5131G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.72 Bridle/Paddock: 150-1690-5135G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 Paddock Ln 150-1690-5137G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.72 Bridle Path: 150-1690-5146G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.72 Paddock/Bridle: 150-1690-5158G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.72 6471 Carriage: 150-1691-0155G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.72 Bridle/Steeple: 150-1691-0158G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.72 Bridle/Bluestem: 150-1691-0168G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.72 Prairie/Bridle: 150-1691-0174G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.72 Bridle Path: 150-1691-0177G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.72 Elderberry Ct: 150-1691-0178G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 19301 Annabelle: 150-1691-8063G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 6675 Carriage: 150-1691-8064G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 6681 Bridle: 150-1691-8066G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 6657 Bridle: 150-1691-8079G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 19130 Galloway: 150-1691-8080G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 19065 Galloway: 150-1691-8082G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $30.82 6485 Larkspur: 150-1692-0907G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 6398 Larkspur: 150-1692-0908G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 66TH/CEDAR: 150-1692-8373G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 Bridle/66th Ave: 150-1692-8374G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 19437 Lupine LN: 150-1693-0197G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 19389 Lupine LN: 150-1693-0199G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 19345 Golden TR: 150-1693-0200G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 6310 Steeple LN: 150-1693-0201G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 6370 Steeple LN: 150-1693-0202G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 19367 Annabelle: 150-1693-5724G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 19343 Annabelle: 150-1693-5726G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 19315 Primrose: 150-1693-5731G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 9 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice $15.10 19399 Primrose: 150-1693-5732G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 Primrose/Wildfl: 150-1693-5733G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 Wildflo/Gleason: 150-1693-5734G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 Gleason/Wildflo: 150-1693-5986G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 FIR LN/75TH AVE: 150-1693-7072G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 FIR LN N: 150-1693-7074G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 FIR LN/74TH AVE: 150-1693-7075G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $23.98 FIR LN N/CR 10: 150-1693-7076G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 74TH AVE N: 150-1693-7077G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $23.98 FIR LN N/CR 10: 150-1694-0076G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 FIR LN N: 150-1694-0078G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 FIR LN N/LOT #8: 150-1694-0079G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 FIR LN N/72ND N: 150-1694-0080G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 72ND AVE N: 150-1694-0081G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 FIR LN N/LOT #5: 150-1694-0082G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 ANNABELLE LOT 5 150-1694-0821G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 PRIMROSE COURT 150-1694-4502G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 SUNFLOWER COURT 150-1694-4503G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 WILDFLOWER TRL 150-1694-4505G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 WILDFLOWER TRL 150-1694-4506G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $18.58 74TH PL & MAPLE 150-1694-6889G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 JACK PINE LN N 150-1694-6891G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 74TH AVE N 150-1694-6892G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 75TH AVE N 150-1694-6893G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 HICKORY LN N 150-1694-6894G 500-20420 Bass Lake Cross MI Home 17-012 081121 $15.10 MEADOW RUE CT 150-1694-7911G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 STEEPLE CHASE LN 150-1694-7917G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 SNOWBERRY CT 150-1694-7918G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 MEADOW RUE CT 150-1694-7919G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 STEEPLE CHASE LN 150-1694-7920G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $0.00 LARKSPUR LN/63RD 150-1694-9986G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 63RD AVE N 150-1694-9987G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $57.34 CTY RD10/116 000-0100-1469E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights 081121 $69.39 Ballpark: 120-1246-7200E 100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $20.03 CIVIL DEFENSE: 120-1246-8000E 100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $20.14 Maple Hill Est: 120-1246-8100E 100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $31.11 School Property: 120-1247-9600E 100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $2,228.23 8200 Cty Rd 116: 120-1255-6300E 100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $41.38 19090 Bass Lk Rd:150-1687-7510E 601-49400-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $62.70 9525 Cain Rd: 150-1689-5230E 100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $314.79 Brockton Ln: 150-1689-6871E 602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $112.48 20120 CTY 10 LIF:150-1691-6661E 602-49450-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $155.42 8200 CR116/SIGN: 150-1693-6612E 100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $82.24 BASEBALL FIELD: 150-1693-6855E 100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $42.26 WILDFLOWER: 150-1694-4774G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $9.83 Cty 10/Maple Hi: 120-1246-7300E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights 081121 $18.58 CTY 10/Treptaus: 120-1246-7400E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights 081121 $18.58 CTY 10/St Thomas:120-1246-7500E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights 081121 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 10 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice $21.17 Cty 10/Stanchion:120-1246-7600E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights 081121 $21.17 Co Rd 10 & 50: 120-1246-7700E 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights 081121 $10.72 8200 Cty Rd 116: 120-1246-7800E 100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $9.83 75th Ave/Hwy 116:120-1246-7900E 100-45200-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $0.00 8200 Cty Rd 116: 150-1684-2033E 100-41941-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $27.95 9100 Cty Rd 19: 150-1688-8463E 100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $0.00 6510 Cty Rd 116: 150-1680-4662E 100-42100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 081121 $0.00 6629 CTY 101: 150-1691-8062G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 102ND PL/103RD AVE 150-1694-7926G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 $15.10 STIEG ROAD 150-1694-8543G 500-20200 Accounts Payable 081121 $15.10 STIEG ROAD 150-1694-8544G 500-20200 Accounts Payable 081121 $15.10 LARKSPUR LN/63RD 150-1694-9986G 500-20200 Accounts Payable 081121 $15.10 IRONWOOD LN 150-1695-5954G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 $15.10 IRONWOOD LN/10ND PLACE 150-1695-5955G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 $15.10 JACKPINE LN/IRONWOOD CT 150-1695-5957G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 $15.10 102ND AVE 150-1695-5961G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 $15.10 102ND AVE/JACKPIN LN: 150-1695-5963G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 $15.10 102ND AVE/JACKPIN LN: 1501695-5964G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 $15.10 COACH HOUSE LN 150-1695-6350G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 COACH HOUSE LN/ANNABELLE 150-1695-6351G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 ANNABELLE LN/BLACK OAK LN 150-1695-6352G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 ANNABELLE CT 150-1695-6359G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 COACH HOUSE LN LOT #1 150-1695-6365G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 BLACK OAK CT 150-1695-6367G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 BLACK OAK LN/BLACK OAK CT 150-1695-6371G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 BLACK OAK LN 150-1695-7149G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 GLEASON PARKWAY/BRIDLE 150-1695-8428G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 BRIDLE PATH 150-1695-8431G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 Prairie Sage LN 105-1695-8432G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 Prairie Sage LN 150-1695-8435G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 PAIRIRIE SAGE LN: 150-1695-8436G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 PRAIRIE SAGE LN/BRIDLE PATH 150-1695-8438G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 Gleason Pkwy 150-1695-9395G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 GLEASON PKWY 150-1695-9396G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $15.10 GLEASON PKWY 150-1695-9398G 500-20390 Ravinia Street Lights 081121 $4.07 10257 IRONWOOD LN 150-1696-6794G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 $4.07 IRONWOOD LN/103RD AVE 150-1696-6797G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 $4.07 19403 103RD AVE 150-1696-6799G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 $4.07 19367 103RD AVE 150-1696-6800G 500-20436 Pulte Encore - PUD Skch 17-029 081121 Total WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECT $4,747.86 XCEL ENERGYPaid Chk# 031135 8/26/2021 $22.66 STREET LIGHTINGE 100-43100-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 742684759 Total XCEL ENERGY $22.66 XCEL ENERGYPaid Chk# 031136 8/26/2021 $17.30 UTILITIESE 601-49400-380 Utility & Services (GENERAL) 742100788 $135.99 STREET LIGHTINGE 100-43100-381 Street/Signal Lights 742416166 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF CORCORAN 08/19/21 2:57 PM Page 11 August 2021 Check Amt CommentInvoice Total XCEL ENERGY $153.29 ZEP SALES & SERVICEPaid Chk# 031137 8/26/2021 $120.00 SUPPLIESE 100-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 9006535576 Total ZEP SALES & SERVICE $120.00 10100 Farmers State Bank $449,824.64 Fund Summary 10100 Farmers State Bank 100 GENERAL FUND $269,023.65 201 RESERVES DONATION FUND $666.00 202 POLICE DONATION FUND $5,072.28 411 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY $8,230.00 416 CAPITAL-EQUIPMENT CERTS $425.00 419 HACKAMORE UPGRADE (LENNAR) $466.00 427 GLEASON/66TH PARKWAY EXTENSION $4,879.06 429 CORCORAN TRAIL EAST/WEST $20,121.75 500 ESCROW HOLDING FUND $74,192.06 601 WATER $65,156.62 602 SEWER $1,592.22 $449,824.64 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7d. Council Meeting: August 26, 2021 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Recreational Vehicle Ordinance Action Required: Approval Summary: The City Council directed staff to review and update the City’s recreational vehicle ordinance in 2020. Staff drafted an ordinance and presented a draft in May of 2021 to Council. Council provided minor changes and directed staff to proceed with preparing the ordinance adoption. Attached to this report is an amended ordinance and summary ordinance for approval. Financial/Budget: Minimal costs exist with updating the ordinances. Council Action: Adopt Ordinance 2021-429 and Summary Ordinance 2021-430. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2021-429 2. Summary Ordinance 2021-430 City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING RECREATIONAL VEHICLES The Corcoran City Council ordains as follows: 72.10: PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY. 1) The purpose of this article is to provide reasonable regulations for the use of recreational vehicles on public and private property in the city. This article in not intended to allow what the Minnesota state statutes expressly prohibit. It is intended to prevent public nuisance. 2) Section 84.87, Subdivision 3 of the Minnesota State Statutes states that a city, acting through its City Council, may regulate the operation of snowmobiles on public lands, waters, and prop- erty under the city’s jurisdiction and on streets and highways within its boundaries by resolution or ordinance of the governing body and by giving appropriate notice, provided such regulations are not inconsistent with the provisions of sections 84.81 to 84.88 of the Minnesota State Stat- utes. 3) Section 84.928, Subdivision 6 of the Minnesota State Statutes states that a city, acting through its City Council, may regulate the operation of all-terrain vehicles on public lands, waters, and property under the city’s jurisdiction and on streets and highways within its boundaries by reso- lution or ordinance of the governing body and by giving appropriate notice, provided such regu- lations are not inconsistent with the provisions of sections 84.92 to 84.928 and the rules adopted under section 84.924 of the Minnesota State Statutes. 72.11: DEFINITIONS. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE (ATV) means a motorized flotation-tired vehicle of not less than three but not more than six low-pressure tires with a total dry weight of less than 2,000 pounds and a total width from outside of tire rim to outside of tire rim that is 65 inches or less. It includes Class 1 (width 50 inches or less) and Class 2 (width greater than 50 inches but not more than 65 inches) ATVs as per Minnesota State Statute. BOULEVARD means that portion of the street or highway between the roadway and private property. DESIGNATED TRAIL means a clearly marked route for recreational vehicles to follow. ESTABLISHED RIDING AREA shall mean a trail, course, track, or area on a lot the surface of which has been altered due to or in contemplation of repetitive operation of recreational vehicles over the same. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 GO-CART means a low, four-wheeled motorized device with an open or closed frame designed and used for off-street operation only. GOLF-CART means a passenger conveyance, electric or gasoline motor powered vehicle, with four low pressure tires and an engine displacement not exceeding 800 cubic centimeters and a total dry weight not exceeding 800 pounds. MINI-BIKE means a small, two-wheeled motorized device designed for off-street operation. Mini-bikes may include miniature motorcycles and do not qualify as a moped, motorcycle or an ATV. OFF-HIGHWAY MOTORCYCLE (OHM) means vehicles traveling on two wheels with a seat to be straddled by the operator with handlebars for steering control. OHMs may include some mini-bikes. OPERATE means to ride in or on and control the operation of a recreational vehicle. OPERATOR means every person who operates or is in actual physical control of a recreational vehicle. PUBLIC PROPERTY means property that may be used by the public, subject to reasonable regulation by a governmental body. Such property includes city parks, city parking lots and public school parking lots and grounds. PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY means the entire right of way of a roadway that is controlled by a public entity, including the traveled portions, banks, ditches, shoulders, medians, and other adjacent areas dedicated for public use. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE means all-terrain vehicles, utility task vehicles, golf carts, snowmobiles, off-highway motorcycles, mini-bikes, go-carts, and other motorized vehicles, that by their use fit this definition. ROADWAY means that portion of a street or highway improved, designed or ordinarily used for vehicular travel but not including the boulevard. For the purposes of this article, roadways not dedicated for public use and not maintained by the city are not included within this definition. SEMI-PUBLIC PROPERTY means private property generally open for use by the public but not owned or maintained by a governmental body. Such property includes without limitation: church property, shopping center property and other property generally used by patrons of a commercial or private business establishment. SNOWMOBILE means a self-propelled vehicle designed for travel on snow or ice steered by skis or runners. STREET OR HIGHWAY means the entire width between boundary lines of any way or place when any part thereof is open to the use of the public, as a matter of right, for the purpose of vehicular traffic (includes the right-of-way or boulevard). For the purposes of this article, streets or highways not dedicated for public use and not maintained by the city are not included within this definition. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 UTILITY TASK VEHICLE means a side-by-side, four wheeled vehicle propelled by an internal combustion engine with a piston displacement capacity of 1,200 cubic centimeters or less and has a total dry weight of 1,800 but less than 2,600 pounds. 72.12: RECREATIONAL VEHICLES GENERAL OPERATION REGULATIONS. RECREATIONAL VEHICLES MAY NOT BE OPERATED IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS OF THE CITY: 1) On or adjacent to sidewalks, bike trails, or pedestrian trails. 2) On private property by persons other than the owner, or by anyone on semi-public or public property, unless permission is clearly visible and posted by the owner or person(s) in lawful control of the property, indicating the types of recreational vehicles allowed, subject to the provisions of this ordinance. 3) Within a city parking ramp. 4) Within the boulevard of a city roadway. 5) On county or state highways. 6) Within a county or state highway right-of-way except as allowed in the specific limitations listed in this ordinance. 7) Within a county or state highway right-of-way from April 1 to August 1 as part of Minnesota's Agricultural Zone. 8) On any area posted that recreation vehicles are not allowed. These may be general or specific to the type of recreational vehicle regulated. It is unlawful to remove signs or fences installed by the property owner or person in lawful control of the property. 72.13: RECREATIONAL VEHICLES SPECIFIC LIMITATIONS. 1) Recreational vehicles may not operate with a greater number of passengers than the vehicle is designed to carry. 2) No person shall operate a recreational vehicle in any place in a careless, reckless, or negligent manner so as to endanger the person or property of another or cause injury or damage thereto. 3) No person shall operate a recreational vehicle so as to create a loud, unnecessary or unusual noise that would disturb, annoy or interfere with the peace, safety and general welfare of others. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 4) All recreational vehicles must have a factory approved exhaust. Mufflers may not be altered to increase motor noise, or have a cut-out bypass, or similar device. No exhaust system shall emit a loud, sharp popping or crackling sound. 5) Use of recreational vehicles on any single property shall not exceed four hours in any 24-hour period. ATVs and Utility Task Vehicles engaged in property maintenance or agricultural purposes are exempt from this restriction. 6) The operation of recreational vehicles on an Established Riding Area on a lot or parcel of land of less than two (2) acres in size requires written consent from the property owners and all occupied residences within a 250' radius of all property lines. 7) Off-road hours of operation of ATVs, Utility Task Vehicles, off-highway motorcycles, go-carts, and mini-bikes shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on Monday through Friday, and 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends and federal holidays. ATVs and Utility Task Vehicles engaged in property maintenance or agricultural purposes are exempt from this restriction. 8) Snowmobiles may not be operated off the operator's property or the property of another on which the operator has been given specific, written permission to operate a snowmobile from April 2 to November 30. Hours of operation of snowmobiles throughout the year shall be prohibited between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m., except on a recognized trail or county road right-of-way. Snowmobile operation within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), as defined by the most recently adopted City of Corcoran Comprehensive plan, or amended plan, is prohibited from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. on Monday through Friday, and 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends and federal holidays. Snowmobiles traveling to or from home using the most direct route to or from a recognized trail or county road right-of-way are exempt from these time restrictions. 9) It is unlawful to intentionally chase, run over, or to kill any animal, wild or domestic, with a recreation vehicle. 10) It is unlawful to intentionally operate a recreational vehicle on either primary or secondary septic sites. 11) A direct crossing of a street, roadway, county or state highway is prohibited when operating a recreational vehicle unless the operator complies with all of the following: a) The driver yields the right-of-way to all oncoming traffic that constitutes an immediate hazard. b) In the case of a divided highway, the crossing shall be made only at an intersection of the highway with another street or road. c) The crossing is made at an angle of approximately 90 degrees to the roadway at a place where no obstruction prevents a quick and safe crossing or blocks the view of oncoming traffic for 300 feet. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 d) The vehicle is brought to a complete stop before crossing the shoulder or entering upon the traveled portion of the street, road or highway. e) If the crossing is made during the period of one-half hour after sunset to one-half hour before sunrise or in conditions of reduced visibility, the front and rear lights of the vehicle are operational and illuminated. 12) Operation of off-highway motorcycles, mini-bikes, and go-carts on public property or in the public right of way is prohibited. 13) Recreational vehicles may be operated in the following areas of the City under these conditions, and subject to the limitations of section 72.16 of this ordinance: a) On the owner’s property or the property of another with written permission, subject to the provisions of this ordinance. b) On privately owned property if the property owner has posted a clearly visible notice indicating "ATVs allowed," "utility task vehicles allowed," “snowmobiles allowed,” “golf carts allowed,” or words substantially similar. Only those types of recreational vehicles which are specifically authorized by such notice shall be permitted on the applicable privately owned property. Such postings shall only permit use on the property on which the notice is posted. c) On public or semi-public property only where there is clearly visible notice indicating "ATVs allowed," "utility task vehicles allowed," “snowmobiles allowed,” “golf carts allowed,” or words substantially similar. Only those types of recreational vehicles which are specifically authorized by such notice shall be permitted on the applicable public or semi-public property. Such postings shall only permit use on the property on which the notice is posted. d) Golf Carts, ATVs, and utility task vehicles which have been issued and maintain a valid on-road permit may be operated on all city roadways pursuant to state law, this ordinance, and the terms of the valid permit. 14) Golf Cart, ATV, or utility task vehicle on-road permits. a) A permit application containing the following information must be submitted to the city's police department, prior to receiving an on-road permit. 1. Applicant name, address, and telephone number. 2. Registered owner name, address, and telephone number. 3. Make, model, vehicle identification number of the golf cart, ATV, or utility task vehicle. 4. Proof of ownership of the vehicle to be registered or written consent from the registered owner to register the vehicle. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 5. Proof of liability insurance for the vehicle. 6. DNR registration number and class description (ATV and utility task vehicles only). 7. Payment in accordance with the city fee schedule. Payments shall be non-refundable. b) On-road permit applicants must be residents of Corcoran and applicants may only register vehicles owned by the applicant or by a member of the applicant’s household. c) An on-road permit application may be denied for failure to completely and accurately provide the permitting requirements set forth within this ordinance, prior violations of this ordinance, or other substantial traffic violations by the applicant or registered owner. Any denial may be appealed to the city council by providing a request for appeal in writing to the Corcoran City Administrator within 14 days of the final decision on the permit. Failure to provide timely notice of a request for appeal shall be deemed a waiver of an appeal of the permitting decision. Any applicant who is denied an on-road permit pursuant to this paragraph shall be ineligible for an on-road permit from the City for a period of six (6) months from the date of a final decision on the permit. d) A granted on-road permit will be valid for the term set forth in the permit, subject to any revocation thereof, and shall not exceed a maximum term of three years. e) On-road permits must be affixed to the front center handlebar, lower center windshield area, or other location visible from the front center of the recreational vehicle. f) Scooters, mopeds, off-highway motorcycles, go-carts, and mini-bikes are not eligible for on-road permits. g) An on-road permit may be revoked for a violation of any provision of this ordinance after due investigation by the city's police department and final determination by the police chief or the chief’s designee. Any revocation may be appealed to the city council by providing a request for appeal in writing to the Corcoran City Administrator within 14 days of the final decision to revoke the permit. Failure to provide timely notice of a request for appeal shall be deemed a waiver of an appeal of the decision to revoke. The revocation will remain in force until the appeal process has been completed. No permit fees will be refunded in the event of a permit revocation. A permit holder who has an on-road permit revoked shall be ineligible to apply for a new on-road permit for a period of six (6) months from the date of the revocation. 15) Golf carts, ATVs, and utility task vehicles may be operated on all city roadways with a valid city on-road permit as allowed by Minnesota State Statute, this ordinance, and the terms of the permit, however, such permit does not validate use on county or state highways. Permitted golf cart, ATV, and utility task vehicle operation shall be subject to the terms of the permit and the following: a) Every person operating a golf cart, ATV, or utility task vehicle on a roadway must be 18 years of age or older. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 b) Every person operating a golf cart, ATV, or utility task vehicle on a roadway must have a valid Minnesota driver’s license or a driver’s license with appropriate reciprocity to operate a motor vehicle on Minnesota roadways. c) Every person operating a golf cart, ATV, or utility task vehicle on a roadway must abide by all speed limits and follow all applicable posted traffic signs. d) Every person operating a golf cart, ATV, or utility task vehicle on a roadway has the rights and duties applicable to the driver of any other vehicle under the provisions of Minn. Stats. Chapters 169 and 84, as they may be amended from time to time, except those provisions that cannot be reasonably applied. e) Every operator/owner of a golf cart, ATV, or utility task vehicle must possess and provide, upon lawful demand, proof of insurance complying with Minn. Stats. § 65B.48, subd 5. f) All golf cart, ATV, or utility task vehicles operated on a roadway after sunset, before sunrise, or in inclement weather, must display an illuminated headlight, an illuminated taillight, and a working brake light. g) Golf carts operated on the roadway shall be required to have an operable horn and a prominently displayed slow moving vehicle emblem. 72.14: SNOWMOBILE SPECIFIC LIMITATIONS. 1) General Limitations. a) As regulated by and subject to state law, snowmobiles may operate in a city, county, or state roadway right-of-way. b) No person shall operate a snowmobile on any public or semi-public land including, but not limited to, the school grounds, park property, playgrounds, recreational areas, golf courses, church properties, and cemeteries. c) Snowmobiles may not be operated in the designated non-use areas except as follows: 1. Loading and unloading of snowmobiles in parking lots. 2. On any clearly marked and designated trail. d) No person shall operate a snowmobile on any public trail system unless said trail system is clearly identified by proper signage and maintained by a recognized snowmobile club or other organization registered with the City. e) From April 2 to November 30, snowmobiles may not be operated off the operator’s property or the property of another on which the operator has been given specific, written permission to operate a snowmobile. From December 1 to April 1, snowmobiles City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 may not be operated off the operator's property or the property of another on which the operator has been given specific, written permission to operate a snowmobile, unless there is a minimum of six inches of snow cover on the ground. In the event an operator is operating a snowmobile on private property pursuant to written authorization, the operator shall keep such authorization in the operator’s immediate possession at all times during operation and provide it to City representatives upon lawful demand. f) No person shall operate a snowmobile at a rate of speed greater than is reasonable or proper under all of the surrounding circumstances, not to exceed 30 miles per hour in any road right-of way or greater than 50 miles per hour on any designated trail system. No person shall operate a snowmobile so as to tow any person or thing in an unsafe manner or at a speed greater than 10 mph. g) A snowmobile may operate on the inside slope of the ditch or the shoulder of a city road only to circumvent an obstruction in the road ditch. The snowmobile must return to the outside slope of the ditch immediately after passing the obstruction. h) A snowmobile may be operated upon a public street or highway only in an emergency during the period of time when and at locations where snow upon the roadway renders travel by automobile impossible. i) No person shall operate a snowmobile within 100 feet of any designated sliding area, or where the operation would conflict with the lawful use of the property or would endanger other persons or property. 2) Equipment. a) It is unlawful for any person to operate a snowmobile within the City of Corcoran unless it is equipped with the following: 1. Brakes adequate to control the movement of and to stop and hold the snowmobile under any condition of operation. 2. A safety, or so-called “dead man” throttle in operating condition, so that when pressure is removed from the accelerator or throttle, the motor is disengaged from the drive track. 3. Headlights, taillights, and brake lights consistent with the regulations used by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 4. Reflective material of at least 16 square inches on each side forward of the handlebar, so as to reflect a beam of light at a ninety-degree angle. 5. Any sled, trailer, or other device being towed by a snowmobile must be equipped with reflective materials as required by the commissioner. 72.15: SNOWMOBILE CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 Any club or organization wishing to construct or develop a trail system within the City of Corcoran for snowmobile use, must register the name of the club or organization with the City Administrative Services Director, and list the names, addresses and phone numbers of the club's contact persons, along with a map of the trail system. 72.16: ESTABLISHED RIDING AREA SPECIFIC LIMITATIONS. 1) General Limitations. a) An Established Riding Area for recreational vehicles shall not be located within a two hundred fifty feet (250') radius of any building occupied by humans or livestock, unless written permission is granted by all landowners within the 250' radius. b) Any unvegetated Established Riding Area the dust from which adversely affects any neighboring property must be watered down, before, during, and after usage as needed to limit dust. c) Dust and noise control measures are to be maintained by the property owner or occupant. These dust and noise control measures may be enforced by the City if other properties are adversely affected by dust and noise due to recreational vehicle use. The adversely affected property owners must file a written complaint with the City with enough information to permit a meaningful investigation by the City. 1. After its investigation, the City may require mitigation measures be taken by a property owner prior to permitting further recreational vehicle operation on Established Riding Areas on the property. These mitigation measures may include, but are not limited to, the planting of twelve foot (12') high coniferous trees planted ten feet (10') on center, or the construction of a six foot (6) minimum board on board style fence, as approved by the City. A mandate of mitigation measures does not eliminate a property owner’s permitting obligations pursuant to City Code. d) At any one time, no more than four (4) recreational vehicle operators who are not the owner or a household member of the owner, may operate a recreational vehicle on the property. All operators who are not the owner or a member of the owner’s household must possess, and immediately produce upon lawful demand, written permission to use the established riding area. e) Operation of a recreational vehicle on an Established Riding Area must cease for a minimum of one (1) hour after every two hours of operation. 72.17: OPERATOR QUALIFICATIONS. 1) Snowmobile operator qualifications. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 a) No person under 14 years of age shall operate a snowmobile alone within the City of Corcoran except on property owned or occupied by a relative or legal guardian. b) A person 14 years of age or older but less than 18 years of age may operate a snowmobile within the City of Corcoran only if they have in their immediate possession proof of a valid snowmobile safety certificate issued by the Commissioner of Conservation as provided by Minnesota Statute 1969, Section 84.96. c) It is unlawful for the owner of a snowmobile to permit the snowmobile to be operated contrary to the provisions of this section. 2) ATV and utility task vehicle operator qualifications. a) No person under the age of sixteen (16) years of age shall operate on streets or the roadway surface of highways or make a direct crossing of a trunk, county state-aid, county highway, or city street as the operator of an ATV or utility task vehicle. A person sixteen (16) years of age or older, but less than eighteen (18) years of age, may operate an ATV or utility task vehicle as permitted under this section, only if he/she has in possession proof of a safety certificate issued by the commissioner as provided by Minn. Stat. 84.872 and is obeying all applicable ordinances and state laws. b) A person born after July 1, 1987 operating an ATV or utility task vehicle must possess a MN DNR ATV safety certificate. c) It is unlawful for the owner of an ATV or utility task vehicle to permit the vehicle to be operated contrary to the provisions of this section. 72.18: EXEMPTIONS. The following uses are exempt from this Ordinance: 1) Any agent or employee of any governmental body, public safety agency, or road authority in conducting official business. 2) Any organized track-racing event that is required to be registered with the DNR, and which receives the applicable DNR approval. 72.19: PERMIT FEE. The permit fee for a Recreational Vehicle required by this section shall be set by council in the city fee schedule, as may be amended from time to time. 72.20: PENALTY. Any operator of a recreational vehicle, and/or any owner or person in lawful control of a recreational vehicle or real property within the City of Corcoran who violates or allows any violation of this ordinance shall be subject the penalties below. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 1) The first violation of this chapter shall constitute a petty misdemeanor. Every person convicted of a petty misdemeanor violation of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be punished by a fine of not more than $300 plus any applicable surcharges. 2) Any 2nd violation within 2 years of a violation of this ordinance, and each subsequent violation within a 2-year period, shall constitute a misdemeanor. Every person convicted of a misdemeanor violation of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be punished by a fine of not more than $1000 plus any applicable surcharges or by imprisonment of not more than 90 days or both, but in either case the cost of prosecution may be added. 72.21: SEVERABILITY. Should any section, subdivision, clause or other provision of this Ordinance be held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part held to be invalid. Section 3. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its publication and passage. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 26th day of August, 2021. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-430 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2021-429 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING RECREATIONAL VEHICLES Ordinance 2021-429 replaces Chapters 72 and Chapter 73 of the Corcoran City Code which regulates recreational vehicles within the City of Corcoran. A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Page 1 of 1 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Nick Wyers, PE File: #-01855- Nelson Turn Lanes Date: August 19, 2021 Subject: Bid Results – CSAH 101 & 105th Place Turn Lane Improvements (for Nelson International) Council Action Requested Staff is recommending Council authorize a contingent Notice of Award for the construction of the CSAH 101 & 105th Place Turn Lane Improvements. The contingency award is necessary to secure the escrow from the developer. The CSAH 101 & 105th Place Turn Lane Improvements are directly associated with Nelson International development site and were required by County to provide a safer intersection for traffic on County Road 101. Bid Results Five bids were received on Tuesday, August 17th for the CSAH 101 & 105th Place Turn Lane Improvements. Bid results are summarized below and details are in the attached table. Contractor Bid Amount •Park Construction Company.$ 337,059.76 •Bituminous Roadways, Inc.$ 366,002.50 •New Look Contracting $ 372,776.00 •Valley Paving, Inc.$ 389,936.00 •G Urban Companies $ 403,200.80 The low bidder was Park Construction Company. with a bid of $ 337,059.76. The Engineer’s estimate was $348,990.00. The authorization of work includes construction, field compliance testing, and engineering management costs estimated at an additional $35,000. The design, permitting, and surveying costs to date for design components are approximately $32,500 Prior to the August 26th Council meeting, Stantec Consulting Services will reach out to Park Construction Company and confirm their commitment to the bid. Funding Funding is through escrow provided by the developer. Engineer’s Recommendation The bids were competitive, therefore, Stantec recommends that the project be awarded to Park Construction Company for $337,059.76 contingent upon the City securing funds and associated permit requirements. Agenda Item 7e. BID TABULATION CITY OF CORCORAN CSAH 101 105TH PLACE TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS 227701855 08/17/2021 Bid Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price BASE BID: 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 19,000.00$ 19,000.00$ 33,400.00$ 33,400.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3,030.00$ 3,030.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 3 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM 1 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 0.01$ 0.01$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 4 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 1930 3.50$ 6,755.00$ 1.90$ 3,667.00$ 2.15$ 4,149.50$ 5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 675 6.50$ 4,387.50$ 5.45$ 3,678.75$ 5.25$ 3,543.75$ 6 REMOVE SIGN & POST EACH 1 75.00$ 75.00$ 101.00$ 101.00$ 55.00$ 55.00$ 7 SALVAGE & REINSTALL SIGN & POST EACH 1 50.00$ 50.00$ 354.00$ 354.00$ 280.00$ 280.00$ 8 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL LUMP SUM 1 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 3,840.00$ 3,840.00$ 2,700.00$ 2,700.00$ 9 SALVAGE & RESPREAD EXISTING TOPSOIL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 9,610.00$ 9,610.00$ 22,000.00$ 22,000.00$ 10 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (EV) (P) CU YD 1050 15.00$ 15,750.00$ 12.00$ 12,600.00$ 24.00$ 25,200.00$ 11 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (LV) CU YD 650 20.00$ 13,000.00$ 19.00$ 12,350.00$ 28.50$ 18,525.00$ 12 COMMON BORROW (MOD) (LV)CU YD 100 20.00$ 2,000.00$ 19.40$ 1,940.00$ 29.00$ 2,900.00$ 13 SUBGRADE CORRECTION EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (LV) CU YD 100 25.00$ 2,500.00$ 19.00$ 1,900.00$ 43.00$ 4,300.00$ 14 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V WOVEN SQ YD 3670 2.50$ 9,175.00$ 1.00$ 3,670.00$ 1.00$ 3,670.00$ 15 GRANULAR BORROW (MOD) (SUBGRADE CORRECTION OVER UTILITIES)TON 50 20.00$ 1,000.00$ 27.30$ 1,365.00$ 20.00$ 1,000.00$ 16 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED TON 2020 22.00$ 44,440.00$ 24.10$ 48,682.00$ 21.50$ 43,430.00$ 17 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2, 100 % CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 190 40.00$ 7,600.00$ 35.10$ 6,669.00$ 36.00$ 6,840.00$ 18 STABILIZING AGGREGATE, 3" MINUS TON 200 35.00$ 7,000.00$ 35.10$ 7,020.00$ 32.00$ 6,400.00$ 19 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 190 5.00$ 950.00$ 10.00$ 1,900.00$ 4.00$ 760.00$ 20 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 910 90.00$ 81,900.00$ 73.80$ 67,158.00$ 80.00$ 72,800.00$ 21 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 910 80.00$ 72,800.00$ 75.30$ 68,523.00$ 76.50$ 69,615.00$ 22 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 15 75.00$ 1,125.00$ 60.60$ 909.00$ 85.00$ 1,275.00$ 23 INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH 2 250.00$ 500.00$ 303.00$ 606.00$ 225.00$ 450.00$ 24 HYDROSEED - SEED MIXTURE 22-111 SQ YD 3365 0.50$ 1,682.50$ 0.35$ 1,177.75$ 1.00$ 3,365.00$ 25 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 SQ YD 3365 1.00$ 3,365.00$ 0.25$ 841.25$ 0.25$ 841.25$ 26 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 1760 3.00$ 5,280.00$ 2.55$ 4,488.00$ 1.75$ 3,080.00$ 27 BALE BARRIERS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 520 7.00$ 3,640.00$ 8.10$ 4,212.00$ 4.80$ 2,496.00$ 28 CULVERT PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 1 225.00$ 225.00$ 152.00$ 152.00$ 400.00$ 400.00$ 29 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 30 150.00$ 4,500.00$ 152.00$ 4,560.00$ 185.00$ 5,550.00$ 30 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 50 50.00$ 2,500.00$ 28.00$ 1,400.00$ 55.00$ 2,750.00$ 31 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3N STRAW 2S SQ YD 3365 2.00$ 6,730.00$ 1.20$ 4,038.00$ 1.50$ 5,047.50$ 32 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RT ARROW) THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)EACH 2 450.00$ 900.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 560.00$ 1,120.00$ 33 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LT ARROW) THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)EACH 2 450.00$ 900.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 560.00$ 1,120.00$ 34 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 3300 1.75$ 5,775.00$ 3.05$ 10,065.00$ 3.40$ 11,220.00$ 35 6" SOLID LINE WHITE - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 1750 1.00$ 1,750.00$ 2.00$ 3,500.00$ 2.25$ 3,937.50$ 36 4" DOTTED LINE WHITE - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN) LIN FT 560 1.00$ 560.00$ 1.50$ 840.00$ 1.70$ 952.00$ 37 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 500 0.75$ 375.00$ 1.50$ 750.00$ 1.70$ 850.00$ 38 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN) LIN FT 430 10.00$ 4,300.00$ 14.10$ 6,063.00$ 16.00$ 6,880.00$ Total Bid:348,990.00$ Total Bid:337,059.76$ Total Bid:366,002.50$ 1481 81st Avenue NE 1520 Commerce Drive Minneapolis, MN 55432 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Bid No. 1 Bid No. 2 Park Construction Company Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Engineer's Estimate Bid No. 1 Bid No. 2 Park Construction Company Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Project No. 2294-17-031 BID TABULATION CITY OF CORCORAN CSAH 101 105TH PLACE TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS 227701855 08/17/2021 Bid Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price BASE BID: 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 22,500.00$ 22,500.00$ 18,500.00$ 18,500.00$ 19,500.00$ 19,500.00$ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 18,500.00$ 18,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 3 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM 1 1.00$ 1.00$ 1,200.00$ 1,200.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 1930 2.00$ 3,860.00$ 2.00$ 3,860.00$ 5.00$ 9,650.00$ 5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 675 7.00$ 4,725.00$ 15.00$ 10,125.00$ 9.00$ 6,075.00$ 6 REMOVE SIGN & POST EACH 1 75.00$ 75.00$ 53.00$ 53.00$ 50.00$ 50.00$ 7 SALVAGE & REINSTALL SIGN & POST EACH 1 575.00$ 575.00$ 525.00$ 525.00$ 220.00$ 220.00$ 8 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL LUMP SUM 1 2,700.00$ 2,700.00$ 2,520.00$ 2,520.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 9 SALVAGE & RESPREAD EXISTING TOPSOIL LUMP SUM 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 9,900.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 10 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (EV) (P) CU YD 1050 8.00$ 8,400.00$ 13.50$ 14,175.00$ 20.00$ 21,000.00$ 11 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (LV) CU YD 650 20.00$ 13,000.00$ 27.00$ 17,550.00$ 27.00$ 17,550.00$ 12 COMMON BORROW (MOD) (LV)CU YD 100 30.00$ 3,000.00$ 33.00$ 3,300.00$ 20.00$ 2,000.00$ 13 SUBGRADE CORRECTION EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (LV) CU YD 100 26.00$ 2,600.00$ 44.00$ 4,400.00$ 40.00$ 4,000.00$ 14 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V WOVEN SQ YD 3670 2.00$ 7,340.00$ 2.00$ 7,340.00$ 4.50$ 16,515.00$ 15 GRANULAR BORROW (MOD) (SUBGRADE CORRECTION OVER UTILITIES)TON 50 75.00$ 3,750.00$ 45.00$ 2,250.00$ 20.00$ 1,000.00$ 16 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED TON 2020 23.50$ 47,470.00$ 27.50$ 55,550.00$ 22.00$ 44,440.00$ 17 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2, 100 % CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 190 50.00$ 9,500.00$ 55.00$ 10,450.00$ 25.00$ 4,750.00$ 18 STABILIZING AGGREGATE, 3" MINUS TON 200 34.00$ 6,800.00$ 44.00$ 8,800.00$ 26.00$ 5,200.00$ 19 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 190 13.00$ 2,470.00$ 3.00$ 570.00$ 4.50$ 855.00$ 20 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 910 88.00$ 80,080.00$ 90.00$ 81,900.00$ 90.00$ 81,900.00$ 21 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 910 85.00$ 77,350.00$ 90.00$ 81,900.00$ 86.00$ 78,260.00$ 22 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 15 50.00$ 750.00$ 30.00$ 450.00$ 70.00$ 1,050.00$ 23 INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH 2 575.00$ 1,150.00$ 525.00$ 1,050.00$ 170.00$ 340.00$ 24 HYDROSEED - SEED MIXTURE 22-111 SQ YD 3365 1.00$ 3,365.00$ 1.00$ 3,365.00$ 1.50$ 5,047.50$ 25 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 SQ YD 3365 0.50$ 1,682.50$ 0.25$ 841.25$ 2.50$ 8,412.50$ 26 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 1760 3.00$ 5,280.00$ 1.65$ 2,904.00$ 5.00$ 8,800.00$ 27 BALE BARRIERS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 520 11.00$ 5,720.00$ 4.50$ 2,340.00$ 8.00$ 4,160.00$ 28 CULVERT PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 1 400.00$ 400.00$ 400.00$ 400.00$ 140.00$ 140.00$ 29 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 30 1.00$ 30.00$ 175.00$ 5,250.00$ 0.01$ 0.30$ 30 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 50 1.00$ 50.00$ 50.00$ 2,500.00$ 0.01$ 0.50$ 31 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3N STRAW 2S SQ YD 3365 1.50$ 5,047.50$ 1.45$ 4,879.25$ 2.50$ 8,412.50$ 32 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RT ARROW) THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)EACH 2 565.00$ 1,130.00$ 530.00$ 1,060.00$ 550.00$ 1,100.00$ 33 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LT ARROW) THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)EACH 2 565.00$ 1,130.00$ 530.00$ 1,060.00$ 550.00$ 1,100.00$ 34 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 3300 2.50$ 8,250.00$ 3.20$ 10,560.00$ 5.00$ 16,500.00$ 35 6" SOLID LINE WHITE - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 1750 1.50$ 2,625.00$ 2.15$ 3,762.50$ 2.25$ 3,937.50$ 36 4" DOTTED LINE WHITE - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN) LIN FT 560 1.00$ 560.00$ 1.60$ 896.00$ 1.75$ 980.00$ 37 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 500 1.50$ 750.00$ 1.60$ 800.00$ 1.75$ 875.00$ 38 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN) LIN FT 430 12.00$ 5,160.00$ 15.00$ 6,450.00$ 16.00$ 6,880.00$ Total Bid: 372,776.00$ Total Bid: 389,936.00$ Total Bid: 403,200.80$ 14045 Northdale Blvd 8800 13th Avenue East Rogers, MN 55374 Shakopee, MN 55379 Bid No. 3 Bid No. 4 New Look Contracting Valley Paving, Inc. Bid No. 3 Bid No. 4 New Look Contracting Valley Paving, Inc. St. Paul, MN 55110 Bid No. 5 G Urban Companies Bid No. 4 G Urban Companies 3781 Labore Road Project No. 2294-17-031 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 7f. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Nicholas Ouellette through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: August 18, 2021 for the August 26, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Final Plat for “Gordon’s Country Estates First Addition” at 19701 Jackie Lane and 19717 Jackie Lane (PID 01-119-23-22-0024 and 01-119-23-22-0021) (city file no. 21-038) 60-Day Review Ends: October 9, 2021 1.Description of Request Jake Overcott has submitted a request for a final plat to adjust the lot line between the two properties. The proposal is to plat the existing 19701 Jackie Lane and 19717 Jackie Lane properties. 2. Background The City Council approved a Preliminary Plat, Variance and Easement Vacation for 19701 Jackie Lane and 19717 Jackie Lane on July 22, 2021. 3. Context Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a final plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the final plat. Zoning and Land Use The subject properties are zoned Urban Reserve (UR) district and the Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Existing Residential. The properties are located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The properties surrounding the site are also zoned UR and guided Existing Residential. Present land use on the site and surrounding properties is single family residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site The Comprehensive Plan Natural Resources Inventory (NRI) map identifies open water on the property located at 19717 Jackie Lane. Hennepin County Natural Resources Map identifies probable and potential wetlands on both parcels within the site. There is a wetland near the center of proposed Lot 1 and a wetland along the south property lines of proposed Lot 1 and Lot 2. Trees exist throughout the site. Gordon’s Country Estates First Edition Final Plat (20-038) 2 August 26, 2021 4. Analysis of Request Final Plat Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the approved preliminary plans, as well as City policies. The Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report and the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo dated June 22, 2021. Staff has included a condition that these items be addressed before the final plat is released for recording. Easements The final plat needs to be revised to include the drainage and utility easements over the wetlands and wetland buffers. Wetlands The preliminary plat needs to be revised to revised to delineate wetlands, wetland buffers and wetland buffer monuments. A wetland delineation report shall be provided for the property at 19701 Jackie Lane. The applicant is allowed to let the wetland buffer strip grow naturally rather than require new wetland plantings if approved by the City as the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Local Government Unit (LGU). The applicant shall contact the City WCA staff to schedule an inspection. Variation The final plat varies slightly from the preliminary plat approved by City Council on July 22, 2021. The shared proposed lot line between proposed Lots 1 and 2 was shifted 4.93 ft. to the east to ensure that the shed on proposed Lot 1 complies with the 20 ft. side yard setback required for accessory structures from the side lot line. Conclusion Staff has reviewed the plan for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the preliminary approvals, Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. The staff report noted outstanding issues that must be address and we have included conditions in the attached resolution to address these issues. 5. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2021-93 approving the Final Plat. Attachments 1. Resolution 2021-93 approving the Final Plat 2. Location Map 3. Engineer’s Memo dated June 22, 2021 4. Preliminary Plat received August 3, 2021 5. Final Plat received August 4, 2021 City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-93 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FINAL PLAT FOR “GORDON’S COUNTRY ESTATES FIRST ADDITION” ON THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 19701 JACKIE LANE AND 19717 JACKIE LANE (PID 01-119-23-22-0024 AND 01-119-23-22-0021) (CITY FILE NO. 21-038) WHEREAS Jake Overcott (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a final plat to allow for a lot line adjustment between the two properties described as follows; SEE ATTACHMENT A NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a final plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A final plat is approved, in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on August 3, 2021 and additional items received on August 4 and August 10, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The applicant must comply with all conditions of approval in Resolution 2021-79 approving the Preliminary Plat and Variance and Resolution 2021-78 approving the vacation. 3. No new lots are being created for development; therefore, no park dedication is required. 4. Prior to release of the Final Plat for recording: a. The applicant shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated June 22, 2021. b. A wetland delineation report shall be provided for the property at 19701 Jackie Lane and approved by the City as the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Local Government Unit (LGU). c. The Preliminary and Final Plat must be revised to show the drainage and utility easements over the wetlands and wetland buffers. d. The Preliminary Plat shall be revised to delineate wetlands and wetland buffers. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-93 Page 2 of 4 e. The Preliminary Plat shall be revised to show wetland buffer monument locations at each change in wetland contour direction or where it crosses a lot line. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits: a. Wetland buffer monument signs must be installed as required by Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. b. A wetland buffer planting plan in compliance with Section 1050.010, Subd. 8C shall be submitted for review and approval. i. Where it is believed existing vegetation meets the requirements for the buffer, the developer should schedule and inspection from City wetland LGU staff to verify where existing vegetation is acceptable. ii. A final buffer plan must be submitted by the developer and approved by the City. c. The wetland buffer plantings must be installed. d. Lot monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. e. Septic permits must be obtained from Hennepin County. f. Record the approving resolutions, mylar and all related documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 6. The applicant must file the final plat at Hennepin County within 2 years of the date of approval or the approval shall expire. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-93 Page 3 of 4 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-93 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT A LOTS 9, 10, AND 11, BLOCK 3, GORDON'S COUNTRY ESTATES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. He nn e p in Co u nty Natu ra l R es o urc es Map Da te : 6/7 /2 02 1 Co mm ent s: Th is da ta (i) is furn ished 'AS IS' wit h n o represe ntation as to comp leteness or accu racy; (ii) is furnish ed with no warra nty of a ny kin d; an d (iii) is n otsu it able for le ga l, engine ering or surveying p ur po ses. He nn epin Cou nt y shall n ot be liable for a ny d amage, in jury or loss re sulting from th is da ta. CO PYRIGHT © HENNEP IN COUNTY 2021 1 inc h = 1 00 f ee t Le ge n d We tla nds Pot en tial Wetland - HC WI Pr obab le We tlan d - H CW I Pr obab le We tlan d - N WI PID: 0 111 9232 2002 1 Ad d re s s: 1 9717 JA C KIE L A, C OR C OR AN O wne r N am e: J A KE OVER C OT T Acr es: 1.3 ¯ Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Project: 229701081 Date: June 22, 2021 Subject: Overcott _Jackie Lane_Gordon Country Estates Lot Line Adjustment Overview • A lot line in Gordon Country Estates (First Addition) is proposed to be adjusted. • New Drainage and Utility Easements (D&U) will be established. • The proposal to vacate the existing side yard D&U easements between Lots 9/10 and Lots 10/11 is acceptable. • The proposed side yard D&U easement between Proposed Lot 1 and Proposed Lot 2 is acceptable. Recommendation • The approved wetland delineation shall be shown on plans prior to recording the final plat. o Drainage and utility easement is required over the formally approved wetlands. • An existing shed encroaches into proposed easement between Proposed Lots 1 & 2 o This structure should be removed or the lot line adjusted as needed. End of Memo ΔΔGORDON'S COUNTRY ESTATESFIRST ADDITIONSURVEY FOR: Jacob OvercottBOUNDARY SURVEYED: 5/12/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT DRAFTED: 5/14/2021LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LOTS 9, 10, AND 11, BLOCK 3, GORDON'S COUNTRY ESTATES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA.CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional LicensedSurveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota._______________________________________________Kaleb Kadelbach PLS 57070’ ΔΔJACKIE LANEROBERT LANE GORDON'S COUNTRY ESTATES FIRST ADDITIONCITY OF CORCORAN, Hennepin County, MinnesotaThis plat of GORDON'S COUNTRY ESTATES FIRST ADDITON was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereofheld this ____ day of ___________________, 20___. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County HighwayEngineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statures Section505.03, Subd. 2.by_________________________________, Mayorby_________________________________, ClerkRESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, MinnesotaI hereby certify that taxes payable in 20___ and prior years have been paid for land described on the Plat, dated this ____ day of _________________, 20___.Mark V. Chapin, County Auditorby______________________________DeputySURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, MinnesotaPursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this _____day of ________________________, 20___.Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyorby________________________________COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, MinnesotaI hereby certify that the within plat of GORDON'S COUNTRY ESTATES FIRST ADDITION was recorded in this office this___day of _____________________, 20___ at________ o'clock ___.M.Martin McCormick, County Recorderby________________________________DeputyKNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Jake Overcott and Anne Nicole Overcott, a married couple; owner and proprietor of the following described property situatedin the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota to-wit:Lot 9, Block 3, GORDONS COUNTRY ESTATESKNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Scott Schneweis and Rebecca Schneweis, a married couple; owners and proprietors of the following described propertysituated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota to-witLOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 3, GORDON'S COUNTRY ESTATES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTAHave caused the same to be surveyed and platted as GORDON'S COUNTRY ESTATES FIRST ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use drainage and utilityeasement as created on this plat.In witness whereof Jake Overcott and Anne Nicole Overcott, a married couple, has caused these presents to be signed this____day of_________________, 20___.________________________________________________________________________Jake OvercottAnne Nicole OvercottSTATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF ______________The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_____ day of_______, 20___, by Jake Overcott, a single person.____________________________Notary Public Signature____________________________Notary Printed Name_______________County, MinnesotaMy Commission Expires_______________In witness whereof Scott Schneweis and Rebecca Schneweis, a married couple, has caused these presents to be signed this____day of_________________, 20___.______________________________________________________________________Scott Schneweis Rebecca SchneweisSTATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF ______________The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_____ day of_______, 20___, by Scott Schneweis and Rebecca Schneweis a married couple.____________________________Notary Public Signature____________________________Notary Printed Name_______________County, MinnesotaMy Commission Expires_______________I Kaleb J. Kadelbach do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that thisplat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been, orwill be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wetlands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown andlabeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.Dated this__________ day of _______________________, 20___._____________________________________________Kaleb J. Kadelbach, Land SurveyorMinnesota License No. 57070STATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF ________The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_____ day of_______, 20___, by Kaleb Kadelbach, Land Surveyor, Minnesota Licence No 57070.____________________________Notary Public Signature____________________________Notary Printed Name_______________County, MinnesotaMy Commission Expires_______________ 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 7g. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: August 17, 2021 for the August 26, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Amendment to Section 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding Accessory Structures (city file no. 21-029) 60 DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: N/A 1.Description of Request City staff recommends approval of a Zoning Ordinance amendment to Section 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding accessory building sidewall height. The Planning Commission held a hearing on June 3rd to review a request from Dave Dornsbach for a conditional use permit to allow a new accessory structure with 16 ft. sidewalls where 13.5 ft. sidewalls are permitted on the property located at 6805 Rolling Hills Rd. The Planning Commission voted 3-2 to recommend approval of the request. At that meeting, Commissioner Lanterman stated that there were conflicts in the Zoning Ordinance that prohibits the City from approving a taller sidewall height for parcels less than 10 acres in size. Staff noted that when the ordinance was created the intent was to allow taller sidewalls on lots less than 10 acres in size by CUP, but offered to review the adopted language with the City Attorney prior to Council review of the request. The issue was reviewed at the June 24th City Council meeting and Council directed staff to schedule a public hearing. 2.Analysis The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the August 5th Planning Commission meeting. There was no one present to speak on this item. The Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the change. The Commission also reiterated their desire to consider other amendments to this section at a future date. 3.Analysis The existing language was adopted by the City Council as part of a 2011 Zoning Ordinance amendment following adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the addition of the language to allow lots smaller than 10 acres in size to exceed the sidewall height was intended to be changed to Ordinance Amendment (21-029) 2 August 26, 2021 allow this request by CUP rather than by a variance as had been previously required. The Council made a number of changes to the accessory structure ordinance at that time and allowing the taller building height by CUP regardless of lot size was part of that update. The City has approved numerous accessory buildings with taller sidewall heights through the CUP process outlined in Section 1030.020, Subd. 5 since adoption in 2011. However, the City Attorney has opined that the language should be revised to eliminate any conflicts. The City Attorney’s memorandum is attached to this report. Staff recommends the following changes to Section 1030.020, Subd. 4.G and H by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows, which will allow Subd. 5.D. to continue to allow the taller sidewall height as has been permitted since 2011: Subd. 4. Size A. Attached garages with a footprint of less than 1,000 square feet shall not be considered as part of the maximum footprint for purposes of the detached accessory structure calculations. However, attached accessory space in excess of the initial 1,000 square feet shall be counted towards the maximum allowable detached accessory building footprint. B. The footprint of above grade or below grade swimming pools and 1 accessory structure of less than 200 square feet shall not be included in the calculation of maximum allowable area of accessory structures. C. A maximum of one fish house shall be permitted to be stored on a property and shall meet all accessory structure setback requirements. Such structures 200 square feet in area or greater shall be counted toward the allowed detached accessory area. D. Except in the UR and RR districts, a conditional use permit is required for construction of more than one detached accessory building with a footprint in excess of 200 square feet. E. The maximum allowable total or accumulated footprint (total footprint of all accessory structures) for detached accessory buildings in the Urban Reserve and Rural Residential districts shall be as follows: Ordinance Amendment (21-029) 3 August 26, 2021 Acres 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 <1 1,250 or 25 percent of the area of the rear yard, whichever is less. 1 1,250 1,275 1,300 1,325 1,350 1,375 1,400 1,425 1,450 1,475 2 1,500 1,531 1,563 1,594 1,625 1,656 1,688 1,719 1,750 1,781 3 1,813 1,844 1,875 1,906 1,938 1,969 2,000 2,031 2,063 2,094 4 2,125 2,156 2,188 2,219 2,250 2,281 2,313 2,344 2,375 2,406 5 2,438 2,469 2,500 2,531 2,563 2,594 2,625 2,656 2,688 2,719 6 2,750 2,781 2,813 2,844 2,875 2,906 2,938 2,969 3,000 3,031 7 3,063 3,094 3,125 3,156 3,188 3,219 3,250 3,281 3,313 3,344 8 3,375 3,406 3,438 3,469 3,500 3,531 3,563 3,594 3,625 3,656 9 3,688 3,719 3,750 3,781 3,813 3,844 3,875 3,906 3,938 3,969 10+ 3,969 CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP F. In the non-residential and urban residential districts, the maximum size of accessory buildings shall not exceed 1,000 square feet or 25 percent of the area of the rear yard, whichever is less. G. Non-agriculture accessory buildings that would result in more than the 3,969 square feet allowed by this Section shall only be permitted on parcels located in the UR or RR district and 10 acres or more in size with a conditional use permit and subject to the following criteria: 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. 3. Applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance. 4. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. Ordinance Amendment (21-029) 4 August 26, 2021 H. Agricultural buildings that would result in more than the 3,969 square allowed by this Section shall only be permitted on parcels 10 acres or more in size with a Certificate of Compliance from the City and subject to the following criteria: 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. 3. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. 4. The agricultural building is used for agricultural purposes only. I. Agricultural buildings in excess of the size limitations allowed by Subd. 4 (E) of this Section shall be allowed by conditional use permit on parcels that are located in the UR or RR district and are less than 10 acres in size, but are adjacent to actively farmed land under the same ownership or ownership by the landowner in a recognized legal relationship, shall be allowed subject to the following criteria: 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. 3. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. 4. The applicant provides proof of ownership as required above. 5. The agricultural building is used for agricultural purposes only. J. Agricultural buildings shall be allowed as a principal use by conditional use permit on parcels that are actively farmed, are located in the UR or RR district and are located adjacent to the farmstead under the same ownership or ownership by the landowner in a recognized legal relationship, shall be allowed subject to the following criteria: Ordinance Amendment (21-029) 5 August 26, 2021 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. 3. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. 4. The applicant provides proof of ownership as required above. 5. The agricultural building is used for agricultural purposes only. Subd. 5. Building Height. A. Sidewall height shall be measured from the base of the structure to the bottom of the eave on the exterior sidewalls. B. The following sidewall heights, eaves, and overhang standards shall exist: Sidewall Height Eaves (minimum) Overhang (minimum) 10’ or less 12” 12” 10’ – 12’ 12” 18” 12’ –13’6” to provide for a 12’ door 12” 24” C. The maximum sidewall height of an accessory building constructed in the front or side yard is 10 feet and a maximum sidewall height of an accessory building constructed in the rear yard is 13 feet, 6 inches, except: 1. Multi-story accessory building may be allowed by administrative permit to exceed these height limits, provided the structure does not exceed the height of the principal structure. All multi-story accessory buildings shall include a minimum of two different building materials and building articulation to add architectural interest to the building elevations. Ordinance Amendment (21-029) 6 August 26, 2021 2. Agricultural buildings may be allowed by Certificate of Compliance to exceed these height limits, provided the structure does not exceed the building height limitations of the zoning district in which it is located. 3. Accessory buildings with accessory dwelling units may exceed these height limits when approved as part of the accessory dwelling unit interim use permit provided all other performance standards for accessory buildings are met. D. Any building that does not meet the standards above may only be permitted to exceed the allowable building height with a conditional use permit and subject to the following criteria: 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. 3. Applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance. 4. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. 5. The proposed building will be compatible with surrounding land uses. Staff recommends that the ordinance amendment be processed prior to Council action on the Dornsbach request. The Dornsbach application could be considered at the August 26th Council meeting after the ordinance adoption. 4. Recommendation Move to adopt the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission: a. Ordinance 2021-427 Amending Section 1030.020 b. Resolution 2021-91 approving Findings of Fact c. Summary Ordinance 2021-428 The first two items require a ¾ vote of the Council. The summary ordinance requires a 4/4 vote of the Council. Ordinance Amendment (21-029) 7 August 26, 2021 Attachments 1. Ordinance 2021-427 Amending Section 1030.020 2. Resolution 2021-91 approving Findings of Fact 3. Summary Ordinance 2021-428 4. City Attorney’s Memo dated June 8, 2021 City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-427 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF TITLE IX OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO ACCESSORY BUILDING STANDARDS (CITY FILE 20-029) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Amendment of the City Code. The text of Chapter 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Corcoran City Code is hereby amended by deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material as follows: Subd. 4. Size A. Attached garages with a footprint of less than 1,000 square feet shall not be considered as part of the maximum footprint for purposes of the detached accessory structure calculations. However, attached accessory space in excess of the initial 1,000 square feet shall be counted towards the maximum allowable detached accessory building footprint. B. The footprint of above grade or below grade swimming pools and 1 accessory structure of less than 200 square feet shall not be included in the calculation of maximum allowable area of accessory structures. C. A maximum of one fish house shall be permitted to be stored on a property and shall meet all accessory structure setback requirements. Such structures 200 square feet in area or greater shall be counted toward the allowed detached accessory area. D. Except in the UR and RR districts, a conditional use permit is required for construction of more than one detached accessory building with a footprint in excess of 200 square feet. E. The maximum allowable total or accumulated footprint (total footprint of all accessory structures) for detached accessory buildings in the Urban Reserve and Rural Residential districts shall be as follows: Acres 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 <1 1,250 or 25 percent of the area of the rear yard, whichever is less. 1 1,250 1,275 1,300 1,325 1,350 1,375 1,400 1,425 1,450 1,475 2 1,500 1,531 1,563 1,594 1,625 1,656 1,688 1,719 1,750 1,781 3 1,813 1,844 1,875 1,906 1,938 1,969 2,000 2,031 2,063 2,094 4 2,125 2,156 2,188 2,219 2,250 2,281 2,313 2,344 2,375 2,406 5 2,438 2,469 2,500 2,531 2,563 2,594 2,625 2,656 2,688 2,719 6 2,750 2,781 2,813 2,844 2,875 2,906 2,938 2,969 3,000 3,031 7 3,063 3,094 3,125 3,156 3,188 3,219 3,250 3,281 3,313 3,344 8 3,375 3,406 3,438 3,469 3,500 3,531 3,563 3,594 3,625 3,656 City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-427 9 3,688 3,719 3,750 3,781 3,813 3,844 3,875 3,906 3,938 3,969 10+ 3,969 CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP F. In the non-residential and urban residential districts, the maximum size of accessory buildings shall not exceed 1,000 square feet or 25 percent of the area of the rear yard, whichever is less. G. Non-agriculture accessory buildings that would result in more than the 3,969 square feet or with greater sidewalls than allowed byin Subd. 5 of this Section shall only be permitted on parcels located in the UR or RR district and 10 acres or more in size with a conditional use permit and subject to the following criteria: 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. 3. Applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance. 4. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. H. Agricultural buildings that would result in more than the 3,969 square or with greater sidewalls than allowed by this Section shall only be permitted on parcels 10 acres or more in size with a Certificate of Compliance from the City and subject to the following criteria: 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. 3. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. 4. The agricultural building is used for agricultural purposes only. I. Agricultural buildings in excess of the size limitations allowed by Subd. 4 (E) of this Section shall be allowed by conditional use permit on parcels that are located in the UR or RR district and are less than 10 acres in size, but are adjacent to actively farmed land under the same ownership or ownership by the landowner in a recognized legal relationship, shall be allowed subject to the following criteria: 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-427 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. 3. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. 4. The applicant provides proof of ownership as required above. 5. The agricultural building is used for agricultural purposes only. Section 2. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 26th day of August 2021. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-91 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF SECTION 1030.020 OF CORCORAN ZONING ORDINANCE (CITY FILE 21-029) WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran has proposed an amendment to the accessory building standards related to sidewall height on accessory buildings; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it does approve an amendment to Title X (Zoning Ordinance) of the City Code to amend the accessory building standards, based on the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment would be consistent with State law and the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 2. The amendment would allow all properties to request a conditional use permit for a taller sidewall regardless of lot size. 3. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the accessory building ordinance as amended in 2011. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2021-428 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2021-427 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF TITLE X OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE RELATED TO ACCESSORY BUILDING STANDARDS (CITY FILE 20-015) Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the text of Chapter 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Corcoran City Code regarding sidewall height on accessory buildings. A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director -1- M E M O R A N D U M TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: John Thames, City Attorney DATE: 6/8/21 RE: Building Height CUP and Interpretation of Corcoran City Code Section 1030.020 Subd. 4(G) and Subd. 5(D) ======================================================= At the request of the Planning Commission and City staff, I have prepared this memo to offer my opinion as to the interpretation and application of Corcoran City Code Section 1030.020, Subd. 4(G) and Subd. 5(D), as they affect the Dornsbach application for a conditional use permit (“CUP”). The requested CUP seeks to allow for the construction of a non-agricultural accessory building with 16 foot sidewalls, which exceed the permitted height of 13 ft, 6 in (pursuant to Subd. 5(B)), on the applicant’s property which is less than 10 acres in size. The application was initially analyzed under 1030.020, Subd. 5(D), which sets forth evaluation criteria for proposed buildings which will exceed the permitted height standards, and which states: “Any building that does not meet the standards above may only be permitted to exceed the allowable building height with a conditional use permit and subject to the following criteria: 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City regulations. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. 3. Applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance. 4. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. 5. The proposed building will be compatible with surrounding land uses.” Staff opined that the application met these standards and recommended approval of the CUP on the property. The Planning Commission agreed with this evaluation, noting the implementation of this analysis on past similar applications. However, Commissioner Lanterman expressed concerns with this interpretation and corresponding conclusion in light of the requirements of 1030.020, Subd. 4(G). The Planning Commission issued a qualified -2- recommendation of approval, but asked that I offer a memo to the Council with analysis of this issue. It is my opinion that the plain language of 1030.020, Subd. 4(G) does prohibit the approval of the requested CUP, due to the size of the Dornsbach property. As Commissioner Lanterman correctly asserted, though subdivision 4 of this Section addresses “Size” of accessory structures, subdivision 4(G) contains a provision which specifically limits the placement of buildings which exceed the allowed accessory building height contemplated by subdivision 5: “Non-agriculture accessory buildings that would result in more than 3,969 square feet or with greater sidewalls than allowed in Subd. 5 of this Section shall only be permitted on parcels located in the UR or RR district and 10 acres or more in size with a conditional use permit and subject to the following criteria:…” 1030.020, Subd. 4(G) Subdivision 4(G) therefore mandates that a proposed building which seeks to exceed the permitted accessory building height standards will only be allowed on parcels at least 10 acres in size, with a CUP. Because the Dornsbach property is less than 10 acres in size, it is not eligible to receive a CUP to allow for a greater accessory building height. There is no language currently in subdivision 5 which permits an evaluation of the application under that subdivision, without regard to the provisions of 4(G). Therefore, the two subdivisions must be interpreted in conjunction with one another. One could posit that the definition of “allowed in Subd. 5” (see 1030.020, Subd. 4(G) above) is to be interpreted broadly to include those accessory buildings which meet the height standards found in subdivision 5B and those which meet the CUP standards of subdivision 5(D). However, this suggestion does not allow for a reasonable interpretation of all the provisions of subdivision 4(G), as it is presently written. Specifically, it renders the CUP process contained in subdivision 4 (as to a building height CUP) contradictory. Such a reading would provide that the 10 acre requirement would only apply to building height CUP applicants who do not qualify for a CUP (under subdivision 5) and suggest that they could become eligible for consideration of a CUP (under subdivision 4), under basically identical standards. It is staff’s strong belief that it was the City’s intent to evaluate applications like the Dornsbach application under the standards set forth in subdivision 5, without regard to a minimum acreage standard. It is believed that this minimum acreage standard was intended to apply only to square footage requirements for non-agricultural accessory buildings. The fact that no mention is made of this acreage requirement in subdivision 5(D) supports this assertion. Nevertheless, the situation before the Council appears to be one in which the plain and black letter language of the code does not match the City’s desire or intended practice. Should this be the case, I would strongly suggest an immediate code amendment be proposed and implemented to align the City’s intent with the code language. Without such amendment, I do not believe the code, as presently written, allows for CUP approval of the Dornsbach application or those future applications which are similar to it. Respectfully Submitted. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 7h. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Nicholas Ouellette through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: August 17, 2021 for the August 26, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Conditional Use Permit for Dave Dornsbach on the Property located at 6805 Rolling Hills Rd. (PID 32-119-23-11-0002) (city file no. 21-018) 120 DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: August 31, 2021 1.Description of Request The applicant has requested a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow a new accessory structure. The building will replace existing accessory structures and will be used for personal use and storage. A conditional use permit is required as the applicant is requesting approval to allow a new 2,241 sq. ft. accessory building with 16 ft. sidewalks where 13.5 ft. sidewalls are permitted. 2. Background The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item at the June 3, 2021 meeting. No residents spoke on the item during the public hearing. Letters from two neighbors were received and shared with the Planning Commission in advance of the meeting. All letters and emails were entered into the public hearing record. The Planning Commission voted 3-2 to recommend approval of the request. At the meeting, Commissioner Lanterman stated that there were conflicts with the Zoning Ordinance that prohibits the City from approving a taller sidewall height for parcels less than 10 acres in size. Staff noted when the ordinance was created the intent was to allow taller sidewalls on lots less than 10 acres in size by CUP but offered to review the adopted language with the City Attorney prior to Council review of the request. The issue was reviewed at the June 24th City Council meeting and Council directed staff to schedule a public hearing to review changes to the ordinance. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the amendment to Section 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding Accessory Structures on August 5, 2021. There were no members of the public present to speak on this item. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the change. Dornsbach CUP (21-018) 2 August 26, 2021 3. Context Zoning and Land Use The property is zoned Rural Residential (RR), and the Comprehensive Plan designates the property as Rural/Ag Residential. The property is located outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Present land use is single family residential with accessory structures present on the property. Surrounding Properties All surrounding properties are located outside the MUSA and are guided Rural/Ag Residential and zoned Rural Residential (RR). Natural Characteristics of the Site The Comprehensive Plan Natural Resource Inventory (NRI) map identifies a High Quality Natural Community Floodplain Forest on the southeast corner of the site and along the south, west and north property lines. The proposed location of the accessory structure is near the west property line and a small impact to the Floodplain Forest is expected. 4. Analysis Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving or denying a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is limited to whether the proposed plan is in substantial conformance with the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the CUP. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Architecture/Building Standards The proposed building will be in the rear yard and meet the required building separation from the principal building on the property. The footprint of the proposed building is 2,241 sq. ft. and the ordinance allows a maximum of 2,313 sq. ft. on this 4.64-acre site. The new building is within the maximum allowable accumulated footprint for accessory buildings in the RR district. There are three existing accessory structures on site totaling 2,115 sq. ft. The existing accessory structures will be demolished to allow for the proposed building to comply with the maximum allowable accumulated footprint for accessory buildings. Dornsbach CUP (21-018) 3 August 26, 2021 The conceptual designs for the building show colored steel wall panels, colored steel wainscoting, colored steel roofing and aluminum soffit and fascia. The applicant has provided sample boards with colors (tan and brown) to be used for the building. An image of a similar building has been included to illustrate the color scheme; this image is for color reference only and does not indicate any designs for the building. The building has minimal aesthetic features to break up the mass of the structure, however, it is unlikely the building will be visible from the public view. Section 1060.050, Subd. 1(D) allows metal roofing and siding via a Certificate of Compliance if the materials meet the standards in the MN State Building Code and have been treated with a factory applied color coating system to protect against fading. The materials comply. The conceptual designs indicate the roof overhangs will extend 2 ft. from the exterior wall of the structure. These materials and designs are consistent with ordinance standards, which require one foot overhangs. The conceptual design for the building indicates a sidewall height of 16 ft. which exceeds the 13 ft. 6 in. maximum sidewall height allowed for accessory structures in the rear yard per City Code. The Zoning Ordinance allows landowners to require a CUP to exceed the sidewall limits and the CUP is discussed later in this report. Landscaping No landscape plan is required. The applicant does not indicate any additional trees or shrubs to be planted or removed in their application. The City does not have a tree preservation ordinance, but staff encourages the applicant to adjust the building location to protect the Floodplain Forest at the proposed building site if possible. A Grading and Erosion Control Plan is required. The applicant shall submit a plan for review prior to building permit issuance. Erosion control should be placed on the downstream limit of construction to prevent offsite transport of sediment. Setbacks The plan complies with the required setbacks for accessory buildings in the RR district. The proposed building will be located in the rear yard and has a 20 ft. setback from the west property line where 15 ft. is required. The proposed building also complies with all other setbacks for accessory buildings in the RR district. Conditional Use Permit The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow for a sidewall height of 16 ft., where 13 ft. 6 in. is the maximum sidewall height allowed for accessory structures in the rear yard per City Code. Section 1030.020, Subd. 5(D) of the Zoning Ordinance allows the landowner to request a CUP to exceed the limitations for sidewall height on an accessory building if the following criteria is met: Dornsbach CUP (21-018) 4 August 26, 2021 1. The proposed use shall be in conformance with all City Regulations. Accessory buildings are a permitted use in the RR district. There are limitations on the maximum allowable total or accumulated footprint (total footprint of all accessory structures) for detached accessory buildings in the RR district. The property currently has three accessory structures with an accumulated footprint of 2,115 sq. ft. in area where 2,313 sq. ft. is allowed. The applicant is proposing to remove all three existing accessory structures to maintain compliance with the maximum allowable accumulated footprint for detached accessory structures on the property. The proposed building is 2,241 sq. ft. in area and within the maximum allowable accumulated footprint for accessory buildings in the RR district. The property owner has requested permission to maintain the existing barn for storage through the development of the new building. While the new building is constructed the property will be in violation of City Code for exceeding the maximum allowable accumulated footprint of accessory buildings. Once the new building is complete, the property owner will demolish the barn which will bring the property into compliance with the City Code. The sidewall height of the proposed building is 16 ft. and the permitted sidewall height for an accessory building in the rear yard is 13 ft. 6 in. in the RR district. The applicant has indicated the additional sidewall height is to allow for storage of trailers. The increased sidewall height will allow for increased indoor storage of items. 2. A certificate of survey shall be required that identifies all existing structures on site, including buildings, septic sites and wells. In addition, the survey shall include the proposed structure, flood plain, wetlands, and any recorded easements. A certificate of survey has been provided to the City with necessary information dated April 19, 2021. Hennepin County GIS indicates potential and probable wetlands on the southeast corner of the property. The City Engineer has concluded a wetland delineation is not required as the proposed development is distant enough from probable wetlands to pose no risk. 3. Applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance. A. Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed use is consistent with the residential and agricultural uses anticipated on this site by the Comprehensive Plan. It will also be consistent with the Rural/Ag Residential land use designation, as the property will continue to be defined by natural areas and areas that are utilized for planted fields, pastureland, hobby farms and large residential lots. Dornsbach CUP (21-018) 5 August 26, 2021 B. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community. The use is allowed within the Rural Residential District. The establishment of the conditional use will be conditioned on the demolition of existing dilapidated buildings which will improve the general public welfare. C. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of the property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, not substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. Conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with accessory structure ordinances. D. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property uses permitted in the district. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. E. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Municipal sewer and water are not available to the site and are not required to accommodate the proposed use. Well and septic systems are available on the property. F. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. G. The conditional use and site conforms to the performance standards as specified by this Chapter. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. Dornsbach CUP (21-018) 6 August 26, 2021 4. The building materials standards required by this Section have been met. The building materials must comply with performance standards in Section 1060.050, Subd. 1(D), which allows metal roofing and siding via a Certificate of Compliance if the materials meet the standards in the MN State Building Code and have been treated with a factory applied color coating system to protect against fading. The materials comply. 5. The proposed building will be compatible with surrounding land uses. The surrounding properties are zoned RR district with single family residential and agricultural uses. The proposed building is compatible with these surrounding land uses where large barns and buildings are common. 5. Conclusions Staff has reviewed the plans with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance as proposed to be amended by Ordinance 2021-427 and finds that the standards for a conditional use permit have been met. If the ordinance amendment is approved o August 26th Council meeting, the proposed use is consistent with the type of use existing and projected for the Rural Residential district area of the City. Any outstanding issues that must be addressed have been included as conditions in the attached draft resolutions. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2021-92 approving the conditional use permit for an accessory building exceeding sidewall height on the property. Attachments 1. Resolution 2021-92 Approving the CUP 2. Site Location Map 3. City Engineer’s Memo dated May 25, 2021 4. Significant Natural Resources map dated 2019 5. Applicant Narrative dated April 20, 2021 6. Survey dated April 19, 2021 7. Building Plans dated April 6, 2021 8. Sample Board Exhibit dated May 4, 2021 City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-92 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6805 ROLLING HILLS RD. (PID 32-119-23-11-0002) (CITY FILE NO. 21-018) WHEREAS, David Dornsbach is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of an accessory building on property legal described as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the conditional use permit at a duly called public hearing; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request, subject to the following findings and conditions; 1. A conditional use permit are approved to allow for the construction of a building as shown on application and plans received by the City on April 20, 2021, and additional information received on May 3, 2021. 2. The applicant must comply with all conditions in the City Engineers Memo dated May 25, 2021. 3. A certificate of compliance to allow metal roof and siding on this accessory building is also approved as part of the CUP a. The building materials must comply with Section 1060.050, Subd. 1,B.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. A conditional use permit is approved to allow for an accessory building with sidewalls of 16 ft. where 13 ft. 6 in. is allowed, subject to the finding that applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance have been met. Specifically: a. The proposed use complies with the Comprehensive Plan. The project is consistent with the Rural/Ag Residential land use designationand maintains the rural aspect of the City/ b. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare. The conditional use for the new structure will allow for the demolition of existing dilapidated buildings. c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity. Conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with accessory structure ordinances and building code. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-92 Page 2 of 4 d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property uses permitted in the district. e. Municipal sewer and water are not available to the site and are not required to accommodate the proposed use. Well and septic systems are available on the property. f. The conditional use conforms to the applicable regulations of the Rural Residential district. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. g. The conditional use and site conforms to performance standards as specified by Chapter 1070.020 and staff has found that the building conforms to other standards specified in the Zoning Code. 5. The property cannot be used for commercial purposes unless a separate approval is requested and granted by the City. 6. A building permit is required prior to beginning construction. 7. FURTHER, that the following conditions must be met prior to issuance of building permits: a. The silo and shed accessory structures must be demolished. b. The old barn building may remain during construction but must be removed from the site within 30 days of completion of the new accessory building. i. The applicant must submit a $5,000 escrow as a financial guarantee to ensure removal of the accessory building. The escrow will be refunded upon removal of the building. c. The applicant/landowner must record the approving resolution at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 8. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use and the required improvements. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-92 Page 3 of 4 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-92 Page 4 of 4 Attachment A That part of the East 445.00 feet of Government Lot 4 of Section 32, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying south of the North 583.17 feet of said Government lot 4 and lying north of the South 252.00 feet of said Government Lot 4 He nn e p in Co u nty Natu ra l R es o urc es Map Da te : 5/1 7/20 21 Co mm ent s: Th is da ta (i) is furn ished 'AS IS' wit h n o represe ntation as to comp leteness or accu racy; (ii) is furnish ed with no warra nty of a ny kin d; an d (iii) is n otsu it able for le ga l, engine ering or surveying p ur po ses. He nn epin Cou nt y shall n ot be liable for a ny d amage, in jury or loss re sulting from th is da ta. CO PYRIGHT © HENNEP IN COUNTY 2021 1 inc h = 1 00 f ee t Le ge n d FEM A Floodp lai ns - 10 0 Y ea r A AE FL OODPLAIN AH AO AE FL OODWAY We tla nds Pot en tial Wetland - HC WI Pr obab le We tlan d - H CW I Pr obab le We tlan d - N WI PID: 3 211 9 2311000 2 Ad d re s s: 6 805 RO LLIN G H IL LS R D, C OR C OR AN O wne r N am e: D K D OR NS BACH /JM D OR N SBAC H Acr es: 4.64 ¯ Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Project: B002294-20-502 Date: May 25, 2021 Subject: Dornsbach CUP Summary • The construction of the outbuilding does not affect drainage patterns. • The wetland delineation requirement is waived after a topographic/aerial review was completed of the proposed building site. • Applicant to submit a Grading and Erosion control plan for review prior to building permit issuance. o Erosion control should be placed on the downstream limit of construction, to prevent offsite transport of sediment. • An escrow will be required. End of Memo City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of MedinaCity of RogersBechtold RdPioneer TrlTrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30Schutte RdOakdale DrCounty Road 10Horseshoe TrlCountyRoad50Larsen RdWillow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead TrlCain RdRolling Hills RdCountryRdMohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler RdDassel LnOld Se t tl ers RdStieg RdKalk RdMeister RdMaple Hill Rd93rd Ave NTessmer RdBlue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710456750456719456730456711645671014567117Brockton Ln N109th Ave N4567101")55Hackamore RdMorinLakeScottLakeJubertLakeGooseLakeCookLakeRushCreekRushCreekSouthForkRushCreekSouthForkRushCreek2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN3,000 0 3,0001,500Feet±Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Natural Resource Inventory Areas.mxdDate: 1/7/2019 Time: 1:10:39 PM User: ShuJC0243^_Natural Community!(Rare Species OccurenceHigh Quality Natural CommunityNatural Plant CommunitiesWetlandsWet PrairieEmergentShrubFloodplain ForestOpen WaterFlood Plain (Reed Canary Dominant)UplandsSavanna/PastureMaple/BasswoodOak ForestDisturbed WoodlandOld FieldMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterMap 1-7Natural Resource Inventory AreasNote: Due to limitations of map scale, distribution and proportion of NaturalCommunity types within each colored area are approximate.Source:Natural Plant Communities, Rare Species Occurence (Natural Resource Inventory andManagement Plan, Nov. 2001, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates)27 WELL C.O.C.O.C.O. VLT C C.O. E E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)>>>>S89°38'53"W 405.01'S00°04'37"W 499.17'S89°47'07"W 405.01'S00°04'37"W 500.14'40 33 33 20 15 15 2020180CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYPREPARED FOR:PREPARED BY:I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature:_____________________________________________ Michael J. Fischer, Jr. Date:________________ License Number: 565054/19/2021 DAVID DORNSBACH 6805 ROLLING HILLS ROAD CORCORAN, MN 55340 MICHAEL J. FISCHER, JR. 135 105TH AVE NW COON RAPIDS, MN 55448 763-300-7257 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SURVEYOR'S NOTES: VICINITY MAP NO SCALE 6805 ROLLING HILLS ROAD CORCORAN, MN 55340 LEGEND WELL VLT C C.O. E REVISIONS: 0 Original Issue 4/19/21 WELL C.O.C.O.C.O. VLT C C.O. E E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)>>>>S89°38'53"W 405.01'S00°04'37"W 499.17'S89°47'07"W 405.01'S00°04'37"W 500.14'40 33 33 20 15 15 2020180CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYPREPARED FOR:PREPARED BY:I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature:_____________________________________________ Michael J. Fischer, Jr. Date:________________ License Number: 565054/19/2021 DAVID DORNSBACH 6805 ROLLING HILLS ROAD CORCORAN, MN 55340 MICHAEL J. FISCHER, JR. 135 105TH AVE NW COON RAPIDS, MN 55448 763-300-7257 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SURVEYOR'S NOTES: VICINITY MAP NO SCALE 6805 ROLLING HILLS ROAD CORCORAN, MN 55340 LEGEND WELL VLT C C.O. E REVISIONS: 0 Original Issue 4/19/21 Sample #1 for Wall Panels Sample #2 for Wainscoting Color Sample Visualization Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Dornsbach CUP • Corcoran, MN05.04.2021 Dornsbach Sample Board City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-99 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran that the following Liquor License is granted effective for the dates as indicated, to the following Licensee, provided appropriate application and insurance documents. LICENSEE LICENSE LICENSE EFFECTIVE DATE NW Area Jaycees* 13570 Grove Drive #287 Maple Grove, MN 55311 1 Day to 4 Day Temporary On-Sale Liquor License September 25, 2021 Event Location: Heidi’s Growhaus 7555 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August, 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Agenda Item 7i. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 8a. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Nicholas Ouellette through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: August 17, 2021 for the August 26, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Rezoning, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Variance and Preliminary Plat for Garages Too on the Property Located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive (PID 32- 119-23-44-0001 and 32-119-23-44-0009) (city file no. 21-016) REVIEW DEADLINE: September 7, 2021 1.Description of Request The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit, variance and preliminary plat to allow for the development of four new buildings as part of a proposed mini storage/self storage facility. The four buildings will be subdivided into smaller storage spaces for rent. A lot line adjustment will result in the transfer of a portion of the property at 2240 State Highway to the property at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive. The applicant is requesting to rezone 2240 State Highway 55 from Urban Reserve (UR) district to the Light Industrial (I-1) district. A conditional use permit is required as the proposed use, “Mini Storage/Self Storage Facilities”, on proposed Lot 1 is a conditional use in the I-1 district. The applicant is also requesting a variance for: a.Lot size and width standards in the UR district at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive; b.Lot width and front setback standards in the I-1 district at 2240 State Highway 55; c.Required parking and drive aisle setbacks from the south property line of 2240 State Highway 55; and, d.Requirement to develop 2240 State Highway 55 with connection to municipal sewer and water in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item at their August 5, 2021 meeting. In addition to the applicant, there were five residents who spoke on the item. There were also a number of letters and emails that were received and shared with the Planning Commission in advance of the meeting. All letters and emails were entered into the public hearing record. All residents who spoke were opposed to the request. Primary concerns were related to access, noise, drainage, lighting and security. The Planning Commission noted concerns about trash, restrooms, commercial activity on site, traffic and security. The Commission voted 3-2 to recommend denial based on the finding that the variance standards were not met for the variance from municipal services and that the development was premature as defined Garages Too (21-016) 2 August 5, 2021 by Section 925 of the City Code. The other applications must then be denied if the application is deemed premature for development. Staff has prepared as resolution for denial based on the Planning Commission recommendation. 3. Context Background The City Council reviewed a concept plan on March 14, 2021 and indicated support for the project with comments. Council discussed the impact to residential neighbors with respect to noise, screening, and lighting. Council also discussed how the storage facility would operate, fire safety concerns and trip counts for access from State Highway 55. Zoning and Land Use The proposed Lot 1 is guided Light Industrial, zoned UR and is part of the Future Study Area for sanitary sewer identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The property includes an existing home and two detached accessory structures, all of which will be removed as part of the development. The proposed Lot 2 (6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive) is guided Existing Residential in the Comprehensive Plan and has an existing home and detached accessory structure that will remain. Surrounding Properties Properties located to the north and east of the site are guided Existing Residential in the Comprehensive Plan and are zoned UR district. The properties directly west and south of the site are guided Light Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan and are zoned I-1 district. Natural Characteristics of the Site There are no natural resources identified in the Natural Resource Inventory. There are trees scattered around the homesite on both properties. 4. Analysis Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan the City must deny the rezoning application. The Garages Too (21-016) 3 August 5, 2021 Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. The City’s discretion in approving a site plan is limited to whether or not the plan meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. The City must approve the site plan if it meets these standards. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed request meets the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. The City’s discretion in approving a preliminary plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Rezoning The two properties that comprise the proposed development site are zoned UR district. The applicant is requesting that the property located at 2240 State Highway 55 be rezoned to I-1 district. The property located at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive will remain zoned as UR. The rezoning request shall be evaluated by the following factors from Section 1070.010, Subd. 2, of the Zoning Ordinance: A. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility is consistent with the policies and provisions for the I-1 district in the Comprehensive Plan, which intends to provide areas for manufacturing, warehousing, automotive, trucking, office and other related uses through the I-1 district. The Future Land Use Map from the Comprehensive Plan designates the property at 2240 State Highway 55 as Light Industrial. The proposed action is consistent with plans for public facilities and capital improvements and will integrate with those facilities once they are available. The change to the lot line will mean a portion of the property at 6315 Horseshoe Bend will be guided Light Industrial due to the change in the lot line. This is not inconsistent with the UR zoning. Because a portion of this area includes the pond created to serve the industrial lot, staff and the Planning Commission are comfortable with the existing land use remaining until the next Comprehensive Plan update when it should be corrected to follow the lot lines. Garages Too (21-016) 4 August 5, 2021 • However, if the City Council feels differently, they could include a condition a Comprehensive Plan Amendment be applied for prior to final plat submission. B. The proposed action meets the purpose and intent of this Ordinance or, in the case of a map amendment, it meets the purpose and intent of the individual district. The proposed use of the site, self storage facilities, meets the purpose and intent of the Light Industrial district which is to provide a full range of industrial, manufacturing, warehousing and similar uses. C. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. The applicant indicates that this storage facility does not require sewer and water to operate. There is no demand for municipal or private sewer and water, therefore, there is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. D. There is adequate buffer or transition provided between potentially incompatible districts. Adjacent properties to the south and west are zoned I-1 and properties to the north and east are zoned UR. Buffer space is provided on the north and east perimeter of proposed Lot 1. Existing trees along the east property line and proposed tree plantings along the north property line provide screening from the proposed development. The applicant has also proposed eight additional trees to be planted on residential properties to the north of the site. Site Plan The request is for approval of a site plan to allow a “Mini Storage/Self Storage Facilities” use in the I-1 zoning district. The proposed development includes four new buildings to provide a total of 37 individual rental storage units. The existing buildings and utilities on 2240 State Highway 55 will be removed. Design Guidelines/Architecture The proposed development is subject to the performance standards in Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance as well as the Southwest District Design Guidelines in Appendix A of the Zoning Ordinance. Plans for proposed Lot 1 show four buildings ranging in height from 21 ft. 7 in. to 23 ft. 10 in. Buildings will have grey rock face concrete block walls, charcoal concrete brick wainscot, white trim and fascia with asphalt shingled roofs. Building “A” is located at the site entrance and features additional architectural features including grey lap siding, stone veneer wainscot and decorative posts. The building materials comply with ordinance standards for design and architecture. The guidelines for commercial development in the Southwest District are minimal and call for high quality business parks with well-landscaped setbacks and buffers. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility meets the guidelines for commercial development in the Southwest District. The Garages Too (21-016) 5 August 5, 2021 orientation of the buildings and individual storage unit entrances generally face away from the residential properties located to the north and east of the site. There is an existing house and accessory structure on proposed Lot 2 which will remain. No new structures will be developed on proposed Lot 2. Lot Analysis Lot standards for the I-1 district are as follows: I-1 District Standards Proposed Lot 1 Minimum lot area 1 acre 4.59 acres Minimum lot width 100 ft. 0 ft. Minimum lot depth 200 ft. 340 ft. Setbacks Front, from major roadways 100 ft. 0 ft. I-1 District Standards Proposed Lot 1 Setbacks Front, from all other streets 50 ft. 70.15 ft. Side 20 ft. 21.42 ft. Rear 20 ft. 50.06 ft. Adjacent to residential 50 ft. 50 ft. Maximum Principal Building Height 45 ft. 23.66 ft. Maximum impervious surface coverage 70% 65.60% While the structures in proposed Lot 1 comply with the setback requirements, the parking area is within the required 50 ft. setback from the front property line. As such, the applicant is requesting a variance from parking setback requirements in the I-1 district. Lot Standards for the UR district are as follows: UR District Standards Proposed Lot 2 Minimum lot area 20 acres 2.12 acres Minimum lot width 300 ft. 275.24 ft. Minimum lot depth 300 ft. 434.31 ft. Setbacks Front, from all other streets 50 ft. 167.78 ft. Side 25 ft. 42.55 ft. Rear 30 ft. 34.36 ft. Garages Too (21-016) 6 August 5, 2021 UR District Standards Proposed Lot 2 Maximum Principal Building Height 35 ft. N/A Proposed Lot 2 does not meet UR district standards for lot size and width but will increase from 1.67 acres to 2.12 acres. The variance request is discussed later in the staff report. Plans show the existing accessory structure on proposed Lot 2 meets the standard for accessory structure footprints and setbacks from the rear and side property lines. Based on an aerial photo, three additional accessory structures may be located on proposed Lot 2 which are not delineated on site plans or certificate of survey. The applicant has indicated the three accessory structures not delineated on plans are chicken coops. Staff has included a provision all structures shall be delineated on plans submitted with the final plat. Parking Site plans show a graded bituminous paved parking surface with concrete curb and gutter. No designated parking spaces are provided on site. The applicant has indicated that there will be no on-site staff and no allowed over-night parking. Parking areas will be used on a temporary basis by customers accessing their storage units during business hours. To that end, the developer has arranged for a towing service to remove vehicles in violation of the over-night parking rule. The plans show a minimum of 60 feet of separation between buildings, which would be adequate for parking in front of a unit and allow traffic to pass unobstructed. As noted in the Lot Analysis, the drive aisle/parking area on proposed Lot 1 does not comply with the 50 ft. setback from the front (south) property line. The applicant is requesting a variance from parking setback requirements in the I-1 district. Signage No signage is proposed as part of the development. Landscaping The Southwest District Design Guidelines recommend landscaping should be designed to work with the existing topography of the area, preserving the rolling hills and natural view corridors. The proposed development preserves the slope on the north of the property and adds landscaping for screening. While the properties to the west and south are vacant industrial properties, the properties to the north and east are single family homes and providing some transition/screening between this use and those homes was identified by the Council as a priority during the concept plan review. Staff notes the highest finished floor elevation of the proposed development is 1045 ft. and homes surrounding the site have Garages Too (21-016) 7 August 5, 2021 elevations between 1018 ft. and 1030 ft. Homes on the residential lots north of proposed Lot 1 are more than 200 ft. from the closest proposed mini storage/self storage facility structure. The homes on 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive and 6311 Horseshoe Bend Drive are, respectively, 142 ft. and 160 ft. from the closest proposed mini storage/self storage facility structure. The applicant’s landscape plan meets ordinance requirements by providing landscaping around the buildings and parking surfaces. City Code requires the minimum number of trees on any given non- residential site to be one overstory tree per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross building floor area or one tree per 50 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. City Code also requires one understory shrub for each 300 sq. ft. of building or one tree per 30 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. Per these standards, the applicant is required to provide 62 trees and 207 shrubs on the site. Landscape plans show 15 existing trees, 47 new trees and 207 shrubs in accordance with this standard. The applicant is also providing eight additional trees on properties adjacent to the north boundary to provide additional screening between residential and light industrial uses. The code does not include a tool to give credit for existing trees or trees planted off site. While staff supports the applicants plan to preserve the existing vegetation on the east lot line and plant trees off-site, an additional 15 trees should be added to the site to meet code requirements. Staff has included this as a condition of approval. • The Planning Commission supported giving credit towards the 62 new trees required for the eight trees to be planted offsite. If City Council agrees, they could modify Resolution xx, condition 6(d) to say “The applicant must preserve the existing 15 trees on the south-east property line, plant the eight trees on the adjacent properties to the north and install 54 new trees and 207 shrubs in compliance with Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance.” Shrub plantings are proposed along the walls of buildings that have visibility from residential properties to the north and east of the site. The applicant’s narrative says that trees are not proposed along the west boundary due to topography and retaining wall issues, but the retaining wall is only one foot high and landscaping could break up the visual of a long wall. Staff note that approximately 30 trees are located on a slope on the north side of proposed Lot 1. Staff has included a condition that the applicant provide a landscape detail to ensure for proper planting of trees on steep slopes. Trees planted on steep slopes like this can struggle to survive if improperly planted. Public Safety Public Safety reviewed the plans and provided an email dated June 23, 2021 stating that the revised plans comply with fire code requirements. The buildings are not sprinkled but do have fire walls and required fire connections through the building. Prior to final plat submittal, initiation of grading, or any other site work, the applicant must provide a turning radius exhibit for the site to ensure that emergency vehicles can safely move through the site. Garages Too (21-016) 8 August 5, 2021 Streets/Access Access to the mini storage/self storage facility on proposed Lot 1 is provided through a private driveway easement which connects to State Highway 55 to the south. Access to the private driveway from State Highway 55 is located within the municipal boundaries of the City of Medina. No access to the mini storage/self storage facility will be provided from Horseshoe Bend Drive. Staff has included a condition that the applicant obtain any required permits and comply with access requirements from the City of Medina or initiate annexation of the property from Medina to Corcoran prior to final plat. MnDOT provided comments to the City with respect to access from State Highway 55. MnDOT recommends providing main access to proposed Lot 1 from Horseshoe Bend Drive rather than the current State Highway 55 access, which is on a horizontal curve on a high speed and high-volume road without turn lanes. However, MnDOT indicated the current access may remain because the proposed development does not meet traffic warrants for required improvements. The applicant is responsible for obtaining an Access Permit from MnDOT. The applicant is also responsible for obtaining approval and financing any requirements from MnDOT including for any work within or affecting the MnDOT right-of- way. The applicant is proposing improvements to the access drive and additional information, as outlined in the Engineer’s Memo dated July 27, 2021, is required to ensure compliance with City and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission rules. The Southwest District Design Guidelines indicate that future driveways and other direct access from new developments to State Highway 55 shall not be permitted. As delineated on the Southwest District map in Figure 1 below, a frontage road is proposed within the district to collect traffic to ensure orderly and safe access to State Highway 55. Staff has included a condition that if the frontage road is built to the proposed development, access to State Highway 55 will be removed and redirected to the frontage road. Garages Too (21-016) 9 August 5, 2021 Figure 1: Southwest District Map from Appendix A of the Zoning Ordinance. The site location is marked by the arrow. Utilities Proposed Lot 1 has existing well and septic and the applicant has indicated the septic system will be removed according to MPCA requirements and the well will be capped per MDH requirements. Development of proposed Lot 1 will not include any new well or septic utilities. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility use will not require an extended employee presence and does not necessitate installation of on-site well and septic facilities. However, the site is located within the MUSA and is required to connect to municipal services prior to any new development. The applicant is requesting a variance from the requirement that municipal services be available at the site prior to development. Staff has included a condition that once municipal services are available to the site, connections must be made. As the lot line is shifting between proposed Lot 1 and Lot 2, vacation of the existing drainage and utility easements along the existing property line will be required with the final plat and shall include the dedication of new drainage and utility easements. Garages Too (21-016) 10 August 5, 2021 Lighting The only lighting for proposed Lot 1 is building lighting on the structures. The applicant has submitted a light fixture cut sheet that appears to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance including the 90- degree cutoff requirement. While some residences may have sight lines to lit areas of the proposed mini storage/self storage facility, existing and proposed tree plantings shall provide screening to the residences. Stormwater Management The proposed stormwater filtration basin is located on both proposed Lot 1 and proposed Lot 2. As noted in the Engineer’s Memo, a stormwater maintenance agreement is required for all stormwater conveyance and treatment facilities. Stormwater ponds shall be designed to be attractive in both flooded and dry conditions and the use of native plants for filtration around the pond is encouraged. Staff has included a condition that the applicant shall own and maintain the stormwater infrastructure. Wetlands A wetland report has been completed showing two small wetlands. The Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) conducted a site inspection on July 19th and found them to be constructed wetlands which would not be subject to wetland buffer and setback requirements. The TEP indicated that the applicant could submit a no loss application for review and approval. That application has not been submitted at the time of this report. Conditional Use Permit The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow “Self Storage Facilities” for the new Garages Too business. Section 1040.125, Subd. 4, of the Zoning Ordinance allows the landowner to request a conditional use permit if they comply with the following standards: 1. Units are to be used for dead storage only. Units are not to be used for retailing, auto repair, human habitation, or any commercial activity, except as allowed by this Section. The applicant has indicated units will be leased to companies and private individuals for storage of items ranging from company vehicles, supplies, automobiles, recreational vehicles and trailers. The applicant has specified that no commercial-type vehicles will be allowed within the units, however, City Code does not prohibit the storage of commercial-type vehicles. The applicant has also indicated repair of personal vehicles will be allowed within storage units but not in the parking or drive aisles. City Code does not allow for the repair of automobiles in mini storage/self storage facilities and staff has included a condition prohibiting this activity. In the project narrative, the applicant indicates “no public traffic, extended employee presence, outdoor storage or over-night parking will be allowed on site”. Staff interprets the provision that no over-night parking will be allowed on site to mean no outside over-night parking. Staff has included a condition that no auto repair will be allowed within units and that no overnight parking is allowed outside of the units. Garages Too (21-016) 11 August 5, 2021 There was discussion at the Planning Commission about how to interpret the code language saying “units are not to be used for… any commercial activity…”. It is staff’s interpretation that the space can be used to store commercial supplies, but that it cannot be used for repairs, production, retail sales, office space or the like. 2. Combining office and /or retail space with a self-service storage facility may be allowed by Conditional Use Permit. The only use proposed for the site is a mini storage/self storage facility. The mini storage/self storage facility will not allow for retail sales of goods or purchases on the site. No office or bathroom facilities will be provided on the site for tenants or staff. 3. Storage of hazardous or flammable materials is prohibited. Staff has included a condition that the storage of hazardous or flammable materials is prohibited. 4. No exterior storage is allowed. The applicant has indicated no exterior storage or overnight parking of any kind is allowed on the site. To that effect, the applicant has arranged ongoing towing services to remove vehicles in violation of these rules. 5. The facility shall be secured by either the walls of the structure and/or fencing. All doors on the units shall face inward and away from the street and property lines. Each unit is secured by the walls of the structure. All doors on the units face inwards and away from residential property lines. The site does not abut any public street or private drive. Buildings A and B have units which face the south property line abuts a I-1 zoned property. 6. An on-site manager is allowed only where adequate sanitary facilities are provided, either through use of a septic system or through connection to the public sanitary sewer system. Use of portable sanitary facilities does not fulfill this requirement. As indicated by the applicant, no extended employee presence is planned for the operation of the mini storage/self storage facility. As such, sanitary facilities are not required and not provided. Garages Too (21-016) 12 August 5, 2021 The use must also comply with the standards in Section 1070.020 of the Zoning Ordinance, specifically: A. Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility use is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated for areas guided Light Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use does not impact public facilities and capital improvement plans. B. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community if the conditions of the approval are met. The use is allowed within the I-1 district. C. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially dimmish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The new business is a conditional use in the I-1 district and the applicant has worked with the adjacent landowner to provide landscaping on the subject property and neighboring properties to provide a transition between uses. Staff has proposed conditions to ensure compliance with the ordinance standards. D. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. E. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Municipal sewer and water are not available to the site, but private utilities would be provided. F. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. Garages Too (21-016) 13 August 5, 2021 G. The conditional use and site conforms to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. Variance for Lot Size and Width Standards in the UR District for Proposed Lot 2 A. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The existing lot at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive is a legal, nonconforming lot, and the combined area with 2240 State Highway 55 lot is not changing. The nonconformity of Lot 2 is decreasing because Lot 2 will increase from 1.67 to 2.12 acres in size. There is practical difficulty in complying with the Zoning Ordinance because the lot is legal nonconforming and it is not possible to create a conforming lot from the combined area of the two lots. Adjusting the common lot line will not result in any real change to the existing conditions with the existing legal nonconforming lot. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The situation is unique to the site as proposed Lot 2 is nonconforming today and that condition will not change if the preliminary plat and variance are approved. The conditions for which the variance is being sought were established after the property at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive had been developed. The constraints to conform with minimum lot size and lot width were established prior to, and not created by, the current landowners. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The combined area of the proposed lots is not changing and only the shared lot line is being adjusted. The essential character of the locality is being preserved as no new lots are being created and proposed Lot 2 has been developed. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the UR district is to preserve areas where urban services are planned, as shown on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, but not yet available. City Code describes that large minimum lot sizes will assist to retain these lands in their natural state until public infrastructure is available. Proposed Lot 2 has already been developed and will continue to preserve the urban service area as it exists today. E. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance to allow for smaller lot dimensions is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for Existing Low Density Residential. The density of roughly 1 unit per 2 acres will remain the same, as no new development or lots are being created. Garages Too (21-016) 14 August 5, 2021 F. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. None. Variance for Lot Width and Setback Standards in the I-1 District for Proposed Lot 1 A. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The property is unique in that the existing lot of record has no frontage on a public or private street. Lot width is measured at the front lot line, which is the property line abutting an existing or dedicated public street or private drive easement. This lot does not abut a public street and gets access over three separate parcels to the south with a new driveway easement. Without a front lot line, the lot width is zero and does not comply with the lot width requirements in the I-1 district. Because the site is being platted, a variance is required as the site will no longer be legal nonconforming and has practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The required setback from the front lot line cannot be met as there is not front lot line from which to require setbacks. The applicant has proposed a 50 ft. building setback from the south property line which serves as the de facto front property line. A variance from the parking/drive aisle setback is requested. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The situation is unique to the site as the property is nonconforming today and that condition will not change if the preliminary plat and variances are approved. The constraints to conform with lot width and front setback standards were established prior to, and not created by the current landowner. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the I-1 district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. The proposed self-storage facility use is a low impact use and generally compatible with adjacent low density residential uses. Plans for the proposed facility comply with I-1 height, lot coverage, setbacks, landscaping, and loading regulations which facilitate compatibility between light industrial uses and residential development. Garages Too (21-016) 15 August 5, 2021 E. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility consistent with the light industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. F. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. None Variance for Parking and Drive Aisle Setbacks for Proposed Lot 1 A. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The property is unique in that the existing lot of record has no frontage on a public street or private drive. Minimum parking and drive aisle setbacks are 10 ft. from the side and rear and in the front the setbacks are the same minimum front setback for principal structures in the zoning district. Without a front lot line, proposed Lot 1 cannot meet the required setbacks for parking and drive aisles. The front of proposed Lot 1 is determined to be the south lot line where access to the site is provided. The parking and drive aisle could meet a 50 ft. setback from the south property line, however meeting such setbacks would require an exceptionally large amount of landscaping and construction work to overcome topographical challenges of developing the steep slope on the north side of proposed Lot 1. This would also shift the development closer to the adjacent residential properties. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The property has no street frontage and the setback requirements for the front lot line do not abut a street. These conditions are unique to the parcel of land and were not created by the landowner. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use that will not be impacted by the proposed development. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the I-1 district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. The proposed self-storage facility use is a low impact use and generally compatible with adjacent low density residential uses. The applicant is proposing a 10 ft. setback from the south property line which is consistent with parking area and drive aisle setbacks for side and rear Garages Too (21-016) 16 August 5, 2021 property lines. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use which would not require extensive buffers between compatible land uses. E. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility consistent with the light industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. F. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. None. Variance for Municipal Services Requirement A. There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. New development within the I-1 district shall only be allowed when a full range of municipal services and facilities are available to serve the area. The site is located in the 2030-2035 stage of the Comprehensive Plan 2040 Staging Plan, but the area is subject to a Metropolitan Council study which is not expected to be completed until the next Comprehensive Plan update. It is not practical to delay the development of a site that will not require municipal sewer and water connection. B. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The property does not have access to municipal sewer and water services which restricts the ability to develop the site and this condition will not change if the proposed development is approved. This development does not require sewer or water services. The constraints to conform with a connection to municipal sewer and water services were not created by the current landowners. C. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use property which will also remain unchanged. D. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the I-1 district, which is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. While this development is proposed without municipal services available to the site, such services are not required to facilitate the proposed use. Garages Too (21-016) 17 August 5, 2021 E. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility that is consistent with the industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. F. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. Staff has included a condition that when municipal sewer and water are available to the site the applicant will be required to connect the facility to those services. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat will create two new lots from two existing parcels. The plat will adjust the lot line between the self storage site and the adjacent residential property and will increase the residential property by 0.34 acres. As discussed earlier in the staff report, the plat does require variances from lot size and width standards in the UR district. No new lots would be created. Summary Staff has reviewed the plans with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance and finds that the standards for the proposed preliminary plat, rezoning, conditional use permit variance have been met. The proposed use for Lot 1 is consistent with the type of use projected for the Light Industrial district area of the City. The proposed use for Lot 2 is consistent with the existing and projected use for the Urban Reserve area of the City. Any outstanding issues that must be addressed have been included as conditions in the attached draft resolutions. If the Commission finds that the standards have not been met for the variance, they could recommend denial of the variance and provide findings of fact for denial. Garages Too (21-016) 18 August 5, 2021 5. Recommendation The City Council should choose one of the following two options: a. Move to adopt Resolution 2021-94 denying the request, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Or b. Move to approve the request by adopting the following: i. Ordinance 2021-461 amending the Zoning Map ii. Resolution 2021-94 approving findings of fact for rezoning iii. Resolutions 2021-95 approving site plan and conditional use permit iv. Resolution 2021-96 approving the variance v. Resolution 2021-97 approving the preliminary plat. Attachments 1. Resolution 2021-94 denying the request 2. Ordinance 2021-431 amending the Zoning Map 3. Resolution 2021-94 approving findings of fact for rezoning 4. Resolution 2021-95 approving site plan and conditional use permit 5. Resolution 2021-96 approving the variance 6. Resolution 2021-97 approving the preliminary plat. 7. Site Location Map dated July 29, 2021 8. City Engineer’s Memo dated July 27, 2021 9. Public Safety Memo dated May 5, 2021 10. Public Safety Email dated June 23, 2021 11. MnDOT Letter dated May 25, 2021 12. Applicant Narrative dated July 8, 2021 13. Development Plans dated July 8, 2021 14. Certificate of Survey for 2240 State Highway 55 dated March 11, 2021 15. Certificate of Survey for 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive dated May 26, 2021 16. Architectural Plans dated April 20, 2021 17. Color Sheets dated July 2, 2021 18. Cut Sheets for Lighting dated May 24, 2021 19. Public Comments City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: DENYING A REZONING, SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCES AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GARAGES TOO ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 AND 6315 HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE (PID 32-119-23-44-0001 and 32-119-23-44-0009) (CITY FILE 21-016) WHEREAS, Craig Scherber of Garages Too, LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval of a rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit, variances and preliminary plat for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive, legal described as follows: That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and Lot 4, Block 2, Schnell’s Highland Acres 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit, variances and preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends denial; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request for a variance for the Municipal Services Requirement based on the finding that the Variance Standards in Section 1070.040 of the Zoning Ordinance have not been met. Specifically: 1. Adequate municipal services and facilities are not available to accommodate the rezoning and proposed use. As such, the request is not reasonable because there is no practical difficulty or hardship in complying with the Zoning Ordinance standard that new development within the Light Industrial (I-1) district shall only be allowed when a full range of municipal services and facilities are available to serve the area. 2. Section 925.010 of the City Code prohibits approval of any subdivision deemed premature. The site is premature for development due to lack municipal sanitary sewer and water service. FUTHER, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request for a rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit, variance for lot size and width standards in the Urban Reserve (UR) district for proposed Lot 2, variance for lot width and setback standards in the Light Industrial (I-1) district for proposed Lot 1, variance for parking and drive aisle setbacks for proposed Lot 1 and preliminary plat based on the finding that it cannot proceed without the variance from the municipal services requirement. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-431 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 (PID 32-119-23-44- 0001) (CITY FILE 21-016) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Corcoran Zoning Map from Urban Reserve (UR) to Light Industrial (I-1), described as follows: See Attachment A Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon adoption of this resolution. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 26th day of August 2021. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-431 ATTACHMENT A That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING FOR 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 (PID 32-119-23-44-0001) (CITY FILE NO 21-016) WHEREAS, Craig Scherber of Garages Too, LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval to rezone the property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the request of Garages Too, LLC for the reclassification of the property, based on the following findings and conditions: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed development is consistent with the policies and provisions for the Light Industrial (I-1) district in the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map designates the site as I-1. 2. The proposed action meets the purpose and intent of the individual district. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility use of the site meets the purpose and intent of the I-1 district which is to provide a full range of industrial, manufacturing, warehousing and similar uses. 3. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility does not require sewer and water to operate and no sewer and water infrastructure is proposed as part of the development. There is adequate infrastructure available to serve the proposed action. 4. There is adequate buffer or transition provided between potentially incompatible districts. Adjacent properties to the north and east are zoned Urban Reserve (UR) and buffer space is provided on the north and east perimeter of the site. Existing trees along the east property line and proposed tree plantings along the north property line will provide adequate buffer and screening from the proposed development. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 2 of 3 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-94 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-95 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 AND 6315 HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE (PID 32- 119-23-44-0001 and 32-119-23-44-0009) (CITY FILE 21-016) WHEREAS, Craig Scherber of Garages Too, LLC (“the applicant”) is requesting approval of a site plan and conditional use permit for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive, legally described as follows: That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and Lot 4, Block 2, Schnell’s Highland Acres 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan and conditional use permit at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A site plan and conditional use permit are approved to allow for the construction of four buildings for a mini storage/self storage facility as shown on application and plans received by the City on June 18, 2021 and additional information received on July 9, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The applicant must comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated July 27, 2021. 3. The applicant must comply with MnDOT comments dated May 25, 2021. 4. The applicant must comply with the Public Safety Plan Review comments dated May 5, 2021 and June 23, 2021. 5. The development shall comply with all I-1 district standards. 6. Prior to submittal of final plat, the applicant must comply with the following conditions: a. Prior to final plat submittal, initiation of grading, or any other site work, the applicant must provide a turning radius exhibit to ensure that emergency vehicles can safely move through the site. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-95 Page 2 of 4 b. Plans shall be revised to show all accessory structures including the three accessory structures on 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive. c. The applicant must coordinate with adjacent landowners for the installation of the eight additional trees. d. The applicant must preserve the existing 15 trees on the south-east property line, plant the eight trees on the adjacent properties to the north and install 62 new trees and 207 shrubs in compliance with Section 1060 of the Zoning Ordinance. e. The applicant must provide a landscape detail to ensure for the proper planting of trees on steep slopes. f. The applicant is required to obtain any required permits and comply with access requirements from the City of Medina or initiate annexation of the property from Medina to Corcoran prior to final plat. g. The applicant is responsible for obtaining an Access Permit from MnDOT. h. The applicant is responsible for obtaining approval and financing any requirements from MnDOT including for any work within or affecting the MnDOT right-of-way. i. No access to the mini-storage/self storage facility will be allowed from Horseshoe Bend Drive. j. The applicant shall own and maintain the stormwater infrastructure. k. When the frontage road is constructed to the proposed development, access to State Highway 55 will be removed and redirected to the frontage road. l. When municipal sewer and water are available to the proposed development, the developer is responsible to pay TLAC (Trunk Line Availability Charges) fees. Connection charges will be due when the connection to municipal sanitary sewer and water is made. 7. A conditional use permit for mini storage/self storage is approved, subject to the finding that the applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Zoning Ordinance have been met. Specifically: a. The proposed mini storage/self storage facility use is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated on this site by the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use does not impact public facilities and capital improvement plans. b. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community. The use is also allowed within the I-1 district. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-95 Page 3 of 4 c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The new business is a conditional use in the I-1 district and conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with ordinance standards. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. e. The site is located within the MUSA but municipal sewer and water are not available to the site. Private utilities would be provided until a connection to municipal sewer and water can be made. f. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. g. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. h. The use shall be subject to the following conditions: i. Units are to be used for dead storage only. Units are not to be used for retailing, auto repair, human habitation, or any commercial activity, except as allowed in section. i. No office and /or retail space is allowed. ii. Storage of hazardous or flammable materials is prohibited. iii. No exterior storage is allowed. iv. The facility shall be secured by either the walls of the structure and/or fencing. All doors on the units shall face inward and away from the street and property lines. v. An on-site manager is allowed only where adequate sanitary facilities are provided, either through use of a septic system or through connection to the public sanitary sewer system. Use of portable sanitary facilities does not fulfill this requirement. No on-site manager is proposed or approved for this project. vi. No auto repair will be allowed on the site or within units. vii. No overnight parking is allowed outside of the units. viii. The applicant must provide a copy of the lease agreement prohibiting such activities for City review and approval. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-95 Page 4 of 4 8. A building permit is required prior to beginning construction. 9. The applicant must submit and receive approval of a wetland No Loss application prior to final plat submittal. 10. The applicant is responsible for maintenance of the stormwater pond and must enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement with the City. 11. The applicant shall execute the Site Improvement Performance Agreement and provide a financial guarantee in compliance with Section 1070 of the Zoning Ordinance. 12. FURTHER, the applicant shall record the approving resolution and required easements at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 AND 6315 HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE (PID 32-119-23-44-0001 and 32-119-23-44-0009) (CITY FILE 21-016) WHEREAS, Craig Scherber of Garages Too, LLC (“the applicant”) is requesting approval of variances for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive, legally described as follows: That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and Lot 4, Block 2, Schnell’s Highland Acres 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance from lot size and lot width requirements in the Urban Reserve (UR) district for the property located at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive; and WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance from lot width and front setback requirements in the Light Industrial (I-1) district for the property located at 2400 State Highway 55; and WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance from parking and drive aisle setback requirements in the I-1 district for the property located at 2400 State Highway 55; and WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance from Municipal Services Requirement for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the variances at a public meeting and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for variance, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. Approval is based on plans received by the City on June 18, 2021 and additional information received on July 9, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The requested variance from the lot size and lot width requirements in the UR district for the property located at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive is approved based on the following findings: City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 2 of 5 a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The existing lot at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive is a legal, nonconforming lot, and the combined area with 2400 State Highway 55 is not changing. The nonconformity of Lot 2 is decreasing because Lot 2 will increase from 1.67 to 2.12 acres in size. There is practical difficulty in complying with the Zoning Ordinance because the lot is legal nonconforming and it is not possible to create a conforming lot from the combined area of the two lots. Adjusting the common lot line will not result in any real change to the existing conditions with the existing legal nonconforming lot. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcels of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowners. The conditions for which the variance is being sought were established after the property at 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive had been developed. The constraints to conform with minimum lot size and lot width were established prior to, and not created by, the current landowners. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The essential character of the locality is not changing as no new lots are being created and Lot 2 has been developed. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the UR district is to preserve areas where urban services are planned, as shown on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, but not yet available. City Code describes that large minimum lot sizes will assist to retain these lands in their natural state until public infrastructure is available. 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive has already been developed and will continue to preserve the urban service area as it exists today. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance to allow for smaller lot dimensions is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for Existing Low Density Residential. The density of roughly 1 unit per 2 acres will remain the same, as no new development or lots are being created. 3. The requested variance from lot width and front setback requirements in the I-1 district for the property located at 2400 State Highway 55 is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The property is unique in that the existing lot of record has no frontage on a public or private street. Without a front lot line, the lot width is zero and does not comply with the lot width requirements in the I-1 district. Because the site is being platted, a variance is required as the site will no longer be legal nonconforming and has practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcels of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowners. The situation is unique to the site as the property is nonconforming today and that condition will not change if the preliminary plat and variances are approved. The constraints to conform with lot width and front setback standards were established prior to, and not created by the current landowner. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 3 of 5 locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the I-1 district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. The proposed self-storage facility use is a low impact use and generally compatible with adjacent low density residential uses. Plans for the proposed facility comply with I-1 height, lot coverage, setbacks, landscaping, and loading regulations which facilitate compatibility between light industrial uses and residential development. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility consistent with the light industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The requested variance from parking and drive aisle setback requirements in the I-1 district for the property located at 2400 State Highway 55 is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The property is unique in that the existing lot of record has no frontage on a public street or private drive. Without a front lot line, proposed Lot 1 cannot meet the required setbacks for parking and drive aisles. The front of proposed Lot 1 is determined to be the south lot line where access to the site is provided. The parking and drive aisle could meet a 50 ft. setback from the south property line, however meeting such setbacks would require an exceptionally large amount of landscaping and construction work to overcome topographical challenges of developing the steep slope on the north side of proposed Lot 1. This would also shift the development closer to the adjacent residential properties. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcels of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowners. The property has no street frontage and the setback requirements for the front lot line do not abut a street. These conditions are unique to the parcel of land and were not created by the landowner. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use that will not be impacted by the proposed development. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the I-1 district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. The proposed self-storage facility use is a low impact use and generally compatible with adjacent low density residential uses. The applicant is proposing a 10 ft. setback from the south property line which is consistent with parking area and drive aisle setbacks for side and rear property lines. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use which would not require extensive buffers between compatible land uses. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 4 of 5 e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility consistent with the light industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The requested variance from Municipal Services Requirement for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. New development within the I-1 district shall only be allowed when a full range of municipal services and facilities are available to serve the area. The site is located in the 2030-2035 stage of the Comprehensive Plan 2040 Staging Plan, but the area is subject to a Metropolitan Council study which is not expected to be completed until the next Comprehensive Plan update. It is not practical to delay the development of a site that will not require municipal sewer and water connection. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcels of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowners. The property does not have access to municipal sewer and water services which restricts the ability to develop the site and this condition will not change if the proposed development is approved. The constraints to conform with a connection to municipal sewer and water services were not created by the current landowners. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Allowing redevelopment of the site to light industrial use from low density residential is consistent with the future land use projected for the site. The residential neighborhood to the north and west will remain essentially unchanged. The south property line abuts an existing light industrial use property which will also remain unchanged. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the I-1 district, which is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. While this development is proposed without municipal services available to the site, such services are not required to facilitate the proposed use. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow for the development of a mini storage/self storage facility that is consistent with the industrial uses anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. f. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. when municipal sewer and water are available to the site the applicant will be required to connect the facility to those services. 6. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use. City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 5 of 5 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2240 STATE HIGHWAY 55 AND 6315 HORSESHOE BEND DRIVE (PID 32-119-23-44-0001 and 32-119- 23-44-0009) (CITY FILE 21-016) WHEREAS, Craig Scherber of Garages Too, LLC (“the applicant”) is requesting approval of a preliminary plat for the properties located at 2240 State Highway 55 and 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive, legally described as follows: That part of the North 340 feet of the South 1065 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 119 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 685 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and Lot 4, Block 2, Schnell’s Highland Acres 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for a preliminary plat, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved, in accordance with the plans received by the City on June 18, 2021 and additional information received on July 9, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval of the preliminary plat is contingent upon the approval of the rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit and variance. 3. The applicant must comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated July 27, 2021. 4. The applicant must submit and receive approval of a wetland No Loss application prior to final plat submittal. 5. Approval of the preliminary plat shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of final plat. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 Page 2 of 2 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Date: 7/27/21 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents: 1. Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC, 22400 State Highway 55 Dated 07/08/2021 2. Certificate of Survey Elsen 6315 Horseshoe Bend Dr, Prepared by Schoborg Land Services, Inc., Dated 03/11/2021 3. Certificate of Survey 22400 State HWY 55, Prepared by Engineering Design & Surveying, Dated 06/04/2020 4. Garages Too Site Improvement Project Civil Site Plans, Prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design, Dated 07/20/2021 5. Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project – Drainage Analysis, Prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design, Dated 06/16/2021 Comments: General: 1. Comments provided are based on the level of detail of the documents provided. Additional comments should be anticipated on future submittals as the level of detail increases. 2. Consistent with the review process, a comment response letter shall be provided in response to the following comments provided in this Memorandum in which the owner/applicant or representative provides a written response to each item. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the proposed plans are subject to additional planning, zoning, public safety, and all other applicable codes and standards of the City of Corcoran. 3. Narrative currently references requirements from “the City of St. Michael”. Designer should update the “Requirements” and “Summary” section to correctly reference City of Corcoran requirements. 4. Site disturbance is identified as over and acre which will require the site to comply with MPCA and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission requirements in addition to City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines. Final approval by the MPCA and Elm Creek WMO must be attained before any site grading or activity may commence. Provide Elm Creek Watershed and MPCA approval within the SWMP when received. 5. Final permitting and documentation of septic system abandonment needs to be provided to the city. 6. Final permitting and documentation of well abandonment needs to be provided to the city. July 27,2021 Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 4 Plat: 1. The applicant shall show all drainage and utility easements and all platting requirements met per the City Code. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided as standard per City requirements. 2. Easements should be provided over all infrastructure used for the conveyance and treatment of stormwater. a. This includes but not limited to, storm sewer inlets, storm sewer pipes, and the stormwater management basin and filtration components. 3. Applicant shall coordinate and meet all requirements of city planning for lot adjustments including any necessary review and vacation of existing easements. Erosion Control/SWPPP 1. Preparation of an erosion control plan and compliance with a Construction SWPPP shall be required for construction. a. A copy of the MPCA Construction Stormwater Permit shall be provided to the City prior to any disturbance activities. b. Additional inlet protection required on all storm sewer inlets, including flankers and on-grade inlets. 2. The City of Corcoran is an MS4 community and site visits will be conducted weekly or after rain events. 3. Outlet pipe from filtration basin is a concentrated discharge directly into a silt fence. Silt fence is for intercepting sheet flow not a concentrated discharge. Provide alternative perimeter protection from this concentrated discharge. 4. Silt fence is placed perpendicular to contours in some locations. Silt fence should only be placed parallel to contours. Consider silt fence relief with rock bags, hale bales, erosion log or similar perimeter control for concentrated discharges. J hooking is also an acceptable method. 5. Provide erosion control at skimmer inlet consistent with City of Corcoran Standard Plate STO-16. 6. Vegetation for Stormwater Management Facility is not provided. Need to provide vegetation tolerant of typical wetland conditions. From MPCA stormwater manual, “Bioinfiltration basins must meet the required 48-hour drawdown time and must be sized to allow for adequate maintenance. 7. Planting notes allows “substitution by Owner”, however the note should be removed or modified to “any substitution must be approved by City”. 8. Silt fence installed outside of easements on access road. Silt fence shall be placed within property or developer shall provide agreement with adjacent property to allow rights for temporary improvements. Transportation 1. The need for fire access around the building shall be determined by Public Safety. 2. A future frontage road is planned for this area connecting Pioneer Trail and Rolling Hills Road. The Site appears north of the future road corridor, but ultimate access will be provided via this future frontage road. 3. Concrete sections are concrete on sand. We typically would expect a class 5 or other aggregate base. Confirm this is correct. 4. Bituminous section calls out sand, draintile detail provided in plans, no draintile shown in bit section, change to not have sand or included draintile for drainage. July 27,2021 Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 4 5. Parking to be verified with City Planning. No designated parking shown. 6. Grading limits are shown for private drive but no additional information on elevations or grades. Details shall be provided for the proposed drive including the improvements and grading to ensure it fits within the existing easement. This shall include all necessary stormwater improvements to ensure driveway improvements don’t impact adjacent properties. Grading /Stormwater 1. The City’s Stormwater Modeling Guidelines shall be used for stormwater systems and modeling (https://corcoranmn.gov/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=15567509). 2. The property owner shall own and maintain the stormwater infrastructure. A stormwater maintenance agreement will be required for all stormwater conveyance and treatment facilities. 3. Stormwater rate control and water quality treatment is not currently shown for private driveway. All disturbed areas must be analyzed for compliance with stormwater standards. Any increase in imperviousness due to the private drive shall be included in modeling. 4. Retaining walls to be located outside of D&U Easement, or an encroachment agreement to be provided. 5. Update OCS Detail 1 to be proportionally drawn. 6. Subwatershed delineation should encompass the entire contributing drainage areas, including undisturbed or off-site areas that drain on, not just the parcel boundary. 7. Time of concentration (Tc) flow paths not shown. Additionally, an aerial is needed to verify surface type and is required per Stormwater Guidelines. Also, the Tc’s calculated were increased to the “minimum Tc” of 15mins. Where does this assumed minimum come from? Typically, 7 mins is considered the minimum Tc for Minnesota. 8. Proposed sub catchment 12S uses Tcs calculated with values attributed to cropland flow. Adjust or edit the value to the Tc minimum for proposed conditions. 9. Designer should check scale of drawings showing drainage areas. Based on the scale of the DA1 and DA2 the parcel is only ~4.7 acres not 5.04 acres. Site Data provided for existing impervious/pervious breakdown on Sheet C1 does not match existing HydroCAD modeling. 10. Plans need a pre-treatment basin detail. 11. It would be more appropriate to model the basin as a two-basin system rather than a single system. As currently modeled, the two basins function as one basin, but they will function in series except at water elevations exceeding 1032.0 after the outlet basins equalize. Ensure filtration is only accounted for within the 2nd basin. 12. Unit hydrograph has peak factor of 400 rather than the default SCS 484 which lower’s peak runoff rates. The 400 peaking factor refers to MSE 3 MN rather than MSE 3. MSE 3 MN is only applicable to rural hydrology per MnDOT and NEH Part 650 – Minnesota Supplement. 13. In the absence of in-situ tests an infiltration rate of 0.06 in/hr should be used for soil type D instead of 0.8 in/hr A soils according to MPCA guidelines. Test pits or in-situ are required for any project proposing natural infiltration practices. This type of practices is difficult (or not feasible) in the heavy soils in Corcoran. 14. Exfiltration flows should be routed in series to a 6” diameter drain tile, not directly to the outlet culvert. Model the drain tile to account for its capacity. 15. Modeling of the overflow to the riser structure (Device #5) overestimates capacity at elevations between 1034.5 and 1035.25 since the orifice is not horizontal. A custom weir/orifice should be used July 27,2021 Garages Too Corcoran Site Improvement Project Kevin Mattson Page 4 of 4 for non-orthogonal orifices. Ensure to use a sharp crested weir coefficient (~3.1) City will provide spreadsheet to determine custom weir HydroCAD inputs based on City standard OCS detail. 16. Update EOF details in model to match plans provided. Dimensions do not seem to match plans. 17. The EOF should be 1 foot above the HWL. Currently the EOF is less than 6 inches above the HWL. 18. Sheet C7.2 – No socks on underdrains should be used. See City of Corcoran standard detail plate STO-20. 19. Upsize all draintile to 6” to reduce chance of clogging. 20. Northern draintile is at 0.8% per sheet C3, but C7.2 only indicates a single slope of 0.5% on the detail. Detail or plan sheet should be updated. 21. Much of the runoff directly to the filtration basin is not pre-treated unless you consider filter strip or swales. Ensure pretreatment is provided for impervious areas prior to filtration/infiltration. 22. Per the Minnesota Stormwmater Manual, the required effective filtration area is determined by the bottom area of the filtration basin not including side slopes. Remove side slopes form infiltration/filtration modeling. 23. NRCS soils report shows a large area of HSG C soils on site. (model uses HSG D), update to appropriate CN. o Proposed conditions shall use HSG D soils for greenspace if within area of disturbance. 24. Pond in proposed Hydrocad should have a defined starting elevation at the controlling outlet structure elevation (NWL). 25. Provide storm sewer sizing calculations using the rational method for the 10 year event. 26. A typical CB inlet capacity is 2 to 2.5 CFS, and CBs shall be spaced accordingly. o Three inches (0.25 feet) of head on a CB will inundate a street centerline (2% slope). o Typical spacing is 200 to 250 feet along a curb that includes about 40 feet from road centerline (drainage area of 10,000 SF per CB). 27. Grading contours not shown on proposed access driveway. Grading limits should be expanded as necessary to account for tie in to existing. 28. 3’ sump required in MH-10 for drop greater than 2’. Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. The applicant indicates that no sewer and water facilities are necessary or provided for the site. 2. If not used with the current development, any wells which service the existing property should be abandoned by a licensed contractor. 3. The existing septic system should be abandoned by a licensed contractor. End of Comments CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us Memo To: Planning (Planner Lindahl) From: Planner Davis Date: May 5, 2021 Re: Garages Too Corcoran (City File No. 21-016) A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on 05/05/2021. In attendance were: Director of Public Safety Gottschalk, Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Planner Davis, Fire Chief Feist, Fire Chief Dave Malewicki, Fire Chief Leuer, and Building Official Geske. The comments are based on revised plans submitted April 20, 2021. The steep slope surrounding the site presents some fire protection challenges. The following public safety comments are provided for the project: 1. Fire barriers will be required in buildings to create fire areas of less than 12,000 square feet; otherwise, the buildings will need to be sprinkled. 2. The requirement for a 150’ hose pull distance must be met throughout the site. The current plans do not reflect this for buildings C and D. 3. A 300’ hose pull distance is permitted if the buildings are sprinkled, or if the applicant wants to claim a topographic waiver as outlined in the International Fire Code 503.1.1.1, the applicant must meet with the Fire Chiefs and the Building Official to determine a sufficient alternative fire protection system. 4. The 24’ roadway to the site was deemed sufficient by the Public Safety Group. 5. A turning radius exhibit is required for the site. From:Ryan Burns To:Natalie Davis; Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Kevin Mattson; Kent C. Torve; Matt Gottschalk; Michael Pritchard Cc:Jeff Leuer (jleuer@ci.loretto.mn.us); Todd Geske Subject:RE: Distribution #21-016 Garages Too Corcoran - Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit, Variance, and Site Plan Date:Wednesday, June 23, 2021 3:11:33 PM Attachments:image002.png image003.png Fire Chief Leuer and Building Official Geske discussed and approved the plan to have fire connections on the front of the building that connect to the rear of the building. Fire would haul an apartment pack to the rear of the building, connect in the rear to the source from the front, and no need not pull a hose around the building. Kind of like a fire riser in multi-story building, instead of going up, they would be going through the building. They will not be sprinkled buildings. Ryan Burns | Lieutenant City of Corcoran | 8200 County Road 116 | Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: (763) 420-8966 | rburns@ci.corcoran.mn.us | | From: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 2:09 PM To: Kendra Lindahl Forwarding <klindahl@landform.net>; Kevin Mattson <kmattson@corcoranmn.gov>; Kent C. Torve <ktorve@wenck.com>; Ryan Burns <rburns@corcoranmn.gov>; Matt Gottschalk <mgottschalk@corcoranmn.gov>; Michael Pritchard <MPritchard@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Distribution #21-016 Garages Too Corcoran - Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit, Variance, and Site Plan Good afternoon, Please find enclosed updated plans for Garages Too. Matt – The applicant believes they addressed Public Safety’s comments by incorporating fire department connections on the front and back walls of Buildings C and D, but Kendra and I are uncertain if this truly satisfies the requirements of a 150’ maximum hose pull distance (or outfitting the buildings with sprinklers). Thank you, Natalie Davis Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 www.ci.corcoran.mn.us ndavis@corcoranmn.gov Direct: 763-258-4272 Main: 763-420-2288 City of Corcoran - A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 An equal opportunity employer MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 May 25,2021 Natalie Davis Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 SUBJECT: MnDOT Review #S21-031 Garages Too-Corcoran NW Quad MN 55 & Rolling Hills Road Corcoran, Hennepin County Dear Ms. Davis: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Garages Too-Corcoran. MnDOT has reviewed the documents and has the following comments: Traffic: MnDOT recommends providing main access from Horseshoe Bend Dr, rather than having customers with trailers accessing the site from a horizontal curve on a high-speed, high-volume roadway without turn lanes. If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact Eric Lauer-Hunt of MnDOT Traffic at eric.lauer-hunt@state.mn.us or 651-234-7875. Permits: An Access permit will be required. Additionally, any use of, or work within or affecting, MnDOT right of way will require a permit. Permits can be applied for at this site: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload a copy of this letter when applying for any permits. Please direct questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig of MnDOT’s Metro Permits Section at Buck.Craig@state.mn.us or 651-234-7911. Review Submittal Options MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 1. Email documents and plans in PDF format to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 megabytes per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each message. 2. PDF file(s) uploaded to MnDOT’s external shared internet workspace site at: https://mft.dot.state.mn.us. Contact MnDOT Planning development review staff at metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us for uploading instructions, and send an email listing the file name(s) after the document(s) has/have been uploaded. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234-7797. Sincerely, Cameron Muhic Senior Planner Copy sent via E-Mail: Buck Craig, Permits Lance Schowalter, Design Jason Swenson, Water Resources Eric Lauer-Hunt, Traffic Andrew Lutaya, Area Manager Douglas Nelson, Right-of-Way Mackenzie Turner Bargen, Multimodal Jesse Thornsen, Multimodal Jason Junge, Transit Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC 22400 State Highway 55 Corcoran, Minnesota 07/08/2021 Page 1 Executive Summary Storage space is in demand and this development responds to fill that need for the area surrounding the West Metro of Hennepin County. The buildings are attractive, well-built and will be a welcomed addition to the City of Corcoran. Overview Garages Too, LLC proposes this project for the City of Corcoran’s consideration. The Project will be located at 22400 State Highway 55 in Corcoran, Minnesota. Building spaces will be leased to companies and private individuals seeking protected and secure storage for their possessions ranging from company vehicles, supplies, automobiles, recreational vehicles, pickup trucks and trailers. However, no commercial-type vehicles are allowed within these units. Each rental space has its own entrance, its individual level of interior finishes, its own power, heat and lighting. Home-based businesses located in the City of Corcoran and surrounding communities will now have an option to office out of their home per city ordinances, but store their business equipment, supplies and other non-ordinance compliant items off-site in this facility. This option will allow Corcoran residents to conduct their business in compliance with city regulations and give each of them a better opportunity to succeed in their business ventures. However, no public traffic or extended employee presence will be allowed for this development and no outdoor storage or over-night parking of any kind will be allowed on this property. To that end, Developer has arranged on- going towing services from Burda’s Towing for any violator- no exemptions granted. Hours of daily operation shall be posted allowing activity from 7:00 am to 9:00 pm only. Each tenant will be required to furnish and maintain two fire extinguishers within each rental space. No retail sales of goods or services will be allowed as this is a storage facility use (S-1) not a business use (B). Repair of personal vehicles will be allowed within a given rental space, but specifically prohibited on all parking lots or drives. This property will be equipped with surveillance equipment to maintain a high level of security for tenants without the need of perimeter fencing or access gates. Signage for the project will be limited to rental unit identification only located above the service door to each rental unit; no other signage will be allowed. Garages Too has contacted adjacent residential land owners adjoining to the north and east boundaries of the existing parcel. Garages Too proposes landscape improvements at select locations on some adjoining properties that will result in enhanced screening of the proposed development. Garages Too also proposes a lot line adjustment with cooperation of the adjoining residential land owner at the northeast corner of the existing property. The existing residential lot (6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive) is owned by Benjamin and Mercedes Elsen and they are supportive of the lot line adjustment and replat of their lot. The existing lot has an existing home, garage, and other residential improvements. The home, garage, and driveway as currently configured on the existing lot provides minimal rear yard and side yard spaces. The replat and increased lot area would provide additional rear/side yard space which would be beneficial to the residential lot. Programming / CUP Standards Business model research revealed area market needs in the leasing of large volume storage spaces. This was evident in the West Metro of Hennepin County for small service-oriented businesses as well as certain private individuals. To meet this market need the Project has been designed with the following features: 1) Four Total Structures- development proposes four (4) stand-alone buildings to maximize development in most efficient manner (identified as Buildings “A” thru “D”); all buildings are non- sprinkled (NS) Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC 22400 State Highway 55 Corcoran, Minnesota 07/08/2021 Page 2 2) Buildings “B”, “C” and “D” have been technically divided into two separate fire areas through the use of a 3-hour fire resistance rated wall assembly meeting the requirements of the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code; their designation is shown as “B1” / “B2”, “C1” / “C2” and “D1” / “D2”. 3) Reason for this division for buildings “B”, “C” and “D” is to comply with the building code for buildings of the indicated size supporting S-1 Moderate Hazard use of these spaces (see Building Area Calculations on sheet #PR-1). 4) Building “A” Signature Unit- storage unit with special features identifying it as the main focal point of project (includes the common facility maintenance space) 5) Typical Rental Unit a) Large Warehouse Space- 12’ x 12’ high overhead door; 60’ to 70’ depth for large items b) Electrical Service- 200amp with separate / individual meters c) Heating System- ceiling mounted individual direct-fired natural gas heaters for each unit Site Development The existing 20 foot wide access drive will be upgraded to a 24 foot wide road to provide access to the facility. An access easement exists to allow site access from Highway 55. No change to Highway 55 is anticipated other than connected to the wider access road. No turn lane improvements are required for Highway 55 as this facility will generate only 20 trips per day far below the 100 daily trips threshold required for any new turn lane1. Chapter 3 of Mn/DOT Access Management Manual includes a series of requirements or warrants when considering design criteria for its roadway system2. None of the 9 warrants listed are triggered by this project. Four separate buildings are served by bituminous paving. Surface storm water will be collected and routed to a storm water management basin on-site with discharge on-grade. The discharge point is protected with rip-rap to address erosion. No exterior storage of any kind is allowed on the property. Landscape Design Landscape design is proposed that is reasonable and appropriate for the proposed development. Tree plantings are proposed with a variety of coniferous and deciduous trees with a quantity that exceeds the city requirement based on building square footage by code 1060.070.2.G.2. Tree plantings are proposed along the north and east sides of the site to provide buffer screening from adjacent residential properties. Existing trees in the southern portion of the east boundary are proposed to remain to the extent possible. Adjacent properties to the west and south are zoned I-1 Light Industrial and future like kind uses are anticipated. Trees are proposed along the south side of the site with a typical spacing of 50 ft. Trees are not proposed along the west boundary due to topography and retaining wall issues. Shrub plantings are proposed along select building walls that have primary visibility from adjacent residential properties. Shrub plantings are proposed along the east and north walls of Building A, and on the east wall of Building C. The total number of shrubs proposed is less than the calculation result based on building square footage required by code 1060.070.2.G.2. The number of shrubs proposed does exceed the calculation result based on site perimeter required by code 1060.070.2.G.2. Building Construction Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC 22400 State Highway 55 Corcoran, Minnesota 07/08/2021 Page 3 Project consists of four (4) masonry structures, using decorative masonry units for all exterior walls and wood roof trusses with asphalt shingle roofing, pre-finished metal fascia, and soffits; 14’-0” truss bearing height, pre-finished doors and windows (see attached Drawings); Building “A”– 5 individual rental units; the signature design feature is finished with stone veneer base and stone cap, lap siding and trim; includes the Facility Maintenance space required for ordinary repairs and upkeep of the buildings and grounds. Building “B” Fire Area “B1” – 7 individual rental units; Building “B” Fire Area “B2” – 6 individual rental units; Building “C” Fire Area “C1” – 6 individual rental units; Building “C” Fire Area “C2” – 5 individual rental units; Building “D” Fire Area “D1” – 6 individual rental units; Building “D” Fire Area “D2” – 2 individual rental units; Total Individual Rental Units – 37 No outdoor / exterior storage is allowed at any time. Variances Standards Variance #1- 6315 Horseshoe Bend Drive (proposed Lot 2): Residential Lot Size and Width The project proposes to replat the existing residential lot (Lot 4, Block 2, Schnell’s Highland Acres 2nd Addition) with additional land resulting in an increased residential lot area. Variance is needed to the lot area and lot width standards of current zoning designation UR Urban Reserve for the residential lot. UR zoning requires a minimum 20 acre lot area and minimum 300 ft lot width. The existing lot is a legal non-conforming lot since it does not confirm to current UR zoning lot area or lot width standards. The lot was of record prior to adoption of the current UR zoning standards. The existing lot area is 1.67 acres. The replat will result in a lot area of 2.12 acres (increase of 0.45 acres). No change is proposed to the existing lot width which is approximately 280 ft at Horseshoe Bend Drive. No change is proposed to current access to the lot which is off of Horseshoe Bend Drive. No access will be provided from the 2240 State Highway 55 property as part of the replat. The lot line modification provided by the plat is beneficial to the properties included in the plat. There are no negative impacts to adjoining properties. The proposed land use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variance #2- 22400 State Highway 55 (proposed Lot 1): Industrial Lot Width and Front Setback This existing lot of record has no frontage on a public street. This is an existing condition not created by the owner. Variance is needed to the required 100 ft lot width and building setback standards of proposed I-1 Light Industrial zoning since the existing lot (and resulting platted lot) has no frontage on a public street. The lot width requirement and front setback requirement cannot be met for proposed Lot 1 as there is no public street adjoining the property. City staff has clarified that the front is determined to be the lot line where access is provided (south). The project does propose building locations that provide a minimum 50 ft building setback from the south, north, and east lot lines. Since the south lot line is interpreted to be the front, the project does provide a 50 ft setback from the interpreted front (south). There are no negative impacts to adjoining properties. Project Development Narrative New Storage Facility by Garages Too, LLC 22400 State Highway 55 Corcoran, Minnesota 07/08/2021 Page 4 The proposed land use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variance #3- 22400 State Highway 55: Parking and Drive Aisle Setback to South Property Line This existing lot of record has no frontage on a public street. This is an existing condition not created by the owner. City staff has clarified that the front is determined to be the lot line where access is provided (south). Variance is needed to the required parking and drive aisle 50 ft setback from front for I-1 zoning. Sufficient driveway and maneuvering space is needed for fire/safety access to all buildings and circulation within the site. Sufficient driveway and maneuvering space is needed to access the building tenant spaces from the south. The project does propose curb setback at 10 ft from south lot line. Adjacent property to the south is I-1 zoned property. Future development of the adjacent property would allow for curb at 10 ft from the same lot line. Compliance with the required 50 ft setback is not practical, would result in an inefficient use of land, and would not provide acceptable fire/safety access. There are no negative impacts to adjoining properties. The proposed land use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variance #4- 22400 State Highway 55: Municipal Services requirement waiver The property is located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is in stage 2030-2035 of the Sanitary Sewer Plan. Since the site is located inside of the MUSA boundary, city code requires it to be developed with sewer and water. Variance is needed to the requirement for municipal services. The proposed use (interior storage) of the project does not need municipal sanitary sewer or municipal water services. No office or bathroom facilities will be provided within tenant spaces. There are no negative impacts to adjoining properties. The proposed land use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Footnotes: 1 Tod Sherman Email, dated 12-14-20 (attached) Tod Sherman, Planning Director Office of Planning, Program Management and Transit 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 (651) 234-7794 Tod.sherman@state.mn.us 2 Mn/DOT Access Management Manual – Chapter 3 Section 3.4.9 Turn Lanes http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html PROJECT LOCATIONSITEMINNESOTA GARAGES TOO CORCORAN SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CORCORAN, MN CITY OF CORCORAN, MNHENNEPIN COUNTY SITE SITE SITE C0State High w a y N o . 5 5 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC Hors e s h o e B e n d D r .Private Drive PROJECT LOCATION SURVEY DATA EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS LEGEND: SITE PLAN NOTES C1 SITE DATA: GENERAL NOTES SETBACKS: KEY NOTES: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FILTRATIONBASIN100 YR=1035.1BOTTOM=1031.5 PRETREATMENTBASIN100 YR=1035.1NWL=1032.0 C2 LEGEND: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA FILTRATION BASIN100 YR=1035.1BOTTOM=1031.5 PRETREATMENTBASIN100 YR=1035.1NWL=1032.0 C3 LEGEND: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA C4 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA LEGEND: SEE SITE DEVELOPMENTPLANS C1, C2 & C3 SURVEY DATA PROJECT LOCATION EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION C5.1 EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULE EROSION CONTROL NOTESEROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE VEGETATION GROUND COVER SCHEDULE SWPP NARRATIVE POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES RESPONSIBLE PARTY DESIGN CALCULATIONS SWPPP Designer: Owner: Garages Too, LLC Contractor: Manager: EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES: TOTAL SITE DATA: LEGEND: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC FILTRATION BASIN NOTES MATCH LINE "A" MATCH LINE "B" C5.2 LEGEND: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA PROJECT LOCATION EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MATCH LINE "A" MATCH LINE "B" H O R S E S H O E B E N D D R I V E C6.1 LEGEND: DEMOLITION NOTES INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MATCH LINE C6.2 LEGEND: DEMOLITION NOTES INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC SURVEY DATA EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MATCH LINE C7.1 CONCRETE PAVEMENT - LIGHT DUTY (PRIVATE SIDEWALK)BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT - HEAVY DUTY INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER C7.2 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC POND OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OCS-1 FILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES:CLAY LINER CRITERIA (Per MPCA Gudelines) · · · · · · · C8 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN305 Lakeview Ave. Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Craig Scherber 612-810-8400 GARAGES TOO, LLC BUILDING SETBACK LINEBUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS:BLDG "A"BLDG "B"BLDG "C"BLDG "D"W = [ (130*30) + (70*30) + (130*30) + (70*20) ] / 400W = 28.25If = [ (400 / 400) - 0.25 ] * 28.25 / 30If = 0.7063 or 70.63%Type of Construction: V-B"S1": AREAal = 9000 + (9000*0.7063) or 15358 sf"S1": AREAac = 9285 sf ... PASSESW = [ (270*30) + (60*0) + (270*30) + (60*30) ] / 600W = 30If = [ (600 / 660) - 0.25 ] * 30 / 30If = 0.659 or 65.90%Type of Construction: III-B"S1": AREAal = 17500 + (17500*0.659) or 29032 sf"S1": AREAac = 18506 sf ... PASSESW = [ (330*30) + (70*30) + (330*30) + (70*30) ] / 800W = 30If = [ (800 / 800) - 0.25 ] * 30 / 30If = 0.75 or 75%Type of Construction: III-B"S1": AREAal = 17500 + (17500*0.75) or 30625 sf"S1": AREAac = 9973 sf ... PASSESW = [ (240*20) + (60*30) + (240*30) + (60*30) ] / 600W = 26If = [ (600 / 600) - 0.25 ] * 26 / 30If = 0.649 or 64.90%Type of Construction: III-B"S1": AREAal = 17500 + (17500*0.649) or 28857 sf"S1": AREAac = 14400 sf ... PASSESW = (L1 * w1 + L2 * w2 + L3 * w3 + L4* w4) / F ... equation 5-4If = [ F / P - 0.25 ] W / 30 ... equation 5-5BUILDING "C"6 UNITS (10800 sf)60' x 180'FFE: 1043.00BUILDING "C"5 UNITS (9000 sf)60' x 150'FFE: 1045.00BUILDING "D"8 UNITS (14400 sf)60' x 240'FFE: 1046.50BUILDING "B"7 UNITS (9973 sf)60' x 20'70' x 125'FFE: 1043.00BUILDING "B"6 UNITS (8573 sf)60' x 20'70' x 105'FFE: 1045.00BUILDING "A"5 UNITS (9285 sf)60' x 150'+FFE: 1043.00FIRE BARRIERFIRE BARRIERSTORM WATER MANAGEMENT PONDSSUMMARY:OCCUPANCY (ALL BUILDINGS) S-1 MODERATE HAZARDFIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM NO SPRINKLERING OF ANY OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGSFIRE BARRIERS REQUIRED @ 3-HR FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGBUILDINGS "B", "C" & "D" 12,000sf MAXIMUM FIRE AREAFDC (150' HOSE REQUIREMENT) SHOWN @ BUILDINGS "C" & "D"(DRY LINE ONLY PROVIDING ACCESS TO REAR OF BUILDING)FIRE BARRIERFIRE AREA "D1"10800 sfFIRE AREA "D2"3600 sfFIRE AREA "C1"10800 sfFIRE AREA "C2"9000 sfFIRE AREA "B1"9973 sfFIRE AREA "B2"8573 sfR 150' - 0"R 150' - 0"R 150' - 0"R 1 50' - 0"FDC (DRY)FDC (DRY)FDC (DRY)FDC (DRY)RETAINING WALLBUILDING "D"BUILDING "B2"BUILDING "B1"3-HR FIRE WALLBUILDING "A"010 204070010 204070Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.comAs indicatedPR-1SITE DEVELOPMENTCONCEPT (37 UNITS)20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateNORTHSOUTH VIEW of PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTSITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN121CITY REVIEW UPDATES7-2-2021 5PR-4COMMON SPACE(FACILITY MAINTENANCE)520 sfUNIT #A-11861 sfUNIT #A-21843 sfUNIT #A-31800 sfUNIT #A-41800 sfUNIT #A-51800 sfTYPICAL WALL SECTION(ALL BUILDINGS)CONCRETE APRONCONCRETE PATIOCOLUMN PIERS (2) @ COVERED ENTRYTYPICAL DEMISING WALL * 1-HR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING (FLOOR TO CEILING) * DRAFT STOP TO ROOF DECK PER CODE5 UNITS @ 30'-0"150' - 0"9' - 7"60' - 0"25' - 11"4' - 2"BUILDING "A" TOTAL LENGTH: 159' - 5"UNIT #B-11203 sfUNIT #B-21404 sfUNIT #B-31400 sfUNIT #B-41400 sfUNIT #B-51400 sfUNIT #B-61400 sfUNIT #B-71750 sfUNIT #B-81750 sfUNIT #B-91400 sfUNIT #B-101400 sfUNIT #B-111400 sfUNIT #B-121404 sfUNIT #B-131203 sfBUILDING "B" TOTAL LENGTH: 270' - 0"70' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"BUILDING "B-1" TOTAL WIDTH: 70' - 0"6 UNITS @ 20'-0"120' - 0"25' - 0"BUILDING "B-1" TOTAL LENGTH: 145' - 0"BUILDING "B-2" TOTAL LENGTH: 125' - 0"5 UNITS @ 20'-0"100' - 0"25' - 0"3-HR FIRE RESISTANCERATED MASONRY WALLTYPICAL DEMISING WALL * SEE BLDG "A"TYPICAL SERVICEDOOR 3' x 7'TYPICAL OHD12' x 12'PROTECTIVE BOLLARDPROTECTIVE BOLLARDPROTECTIVE BOLLARDPROTECTIVE BOLLARDCONCRETE APRONLANDSCAPE ISLANDLANDSCAPE ISLANDFIRE AREA "B1"9973 sfFIRE AREA "B2"8573 sf010204070010204070Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.comAs indicatedPR-2FLOOR PLANSBUILDINGS "A" & "B"20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEWNORTH# Description DateFLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "A"FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "B"12TOTAL AREA: 9285 sfTOTAL AREA "B-1": 9973 sfTOTAL AREA "B-2": 8573 sfENTRY VIEW (daylight)ENTRY VIEW (evening)1 CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 UNIT "C-1"1800 sfUNIT "C-2"1800 sfUNIT "C-3"1800 sfUNIT "C-4"1800 sfUNIT "C-5"1800 sfUNIT "C-6"1800 sfUNIT "C-7"1800 sfUNIT "C-8"1800 sfUNIT "C-9"1800 sfUNIT "C-10"1800 sfUNIT "C-11"1800 sfBUILDING "C" TOTAL LENGTH: 330' - 0"4 UNITS @ 30'-0"BUILDING "C-2" TOTAL LENGTH: 149' - 8"7 UNITS @ 30'-0"BUILDING "C-1" TOTAL LENGTH: 180' - 4"60' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"3-HR FIRE RESISTANCERATED MASONRY WALLCONCRETE APRONTYPICAL OHD12' x 12'TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR3' x 7'LANDSCAPE ISLANDTYPICAL WINDOW48" x 24" AWNINGTYPICAL DEMISING WALL * SEE BLDG "A"FDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESSFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESS2-1/2" DRY LINE CONCEALEDIN DEMISING WALL- PITCHPIPE TO DRAINFIRE AREA "C2"9000 sfFIRE AREA "C1"10800 sf8 UNITS @ 30'-0"TOTAL BUILDING "D" LENGTH: 240' - 0"60' - 0"UNIT #D-11800 sfUNIT #D-21800 sfUNIT #D-31800 sfUNIT #D-41800 sfUNIT #D-51800 sfUNIT #D-61800 sfUNIT #D-71800 sfUNIT #D-81800 sfCONCRETE APRONTYPICAL OHD12' x 12'TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR3' x 7'TYPICAL WINDOW48" x 24" AWNINGTYPICAL DEMISING WALL * SEE BLDG "A"FDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESSFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESS2-1/2" DRY LINE CONCEALEDIN DEMISING WALL- PITCHPIPE TO DRAIN3-HR FIRE RESISTANCERATED MASONRY WALLFIRE AREA "D1"10800 sfFIRE AREA "D2"3600 sf010204070010204070Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.com3/32" = 1'-0"PR-3FLOOR PLANSBUILDINGS "C" & "D"20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateNORTHNORTHFLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "C"FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "D"12TOTAL AREA "C-1": 12,600 sfTOTAL AREA "C-2": 7,200 sfTOTAL "D": 14,400 sf1 CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 PROTECTIVE BOLLARDMASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)ASPHALT SHINGLEROOFING SYSTEMPRE-FINISHED METALFASCIA (FLAT)OHD (PAINT SOFT GRAY)SERVICE DOOR(PAINT SOFT GRAY)ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)DECORATIVE FIXED WINDOWw/ PRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM"3-STEP" PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA @ SIGNATURE UNITDECORATIVE COLUMN w/STONE PIERS & CAPWALL LIGHTWALL LIGHTDOOR TRIMLAP SIDING (PAINT)SOFFIT BOXES (PAINT)912PROTECTIVE BOLLARDROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)TYPICAL AWNING WINDOW(PRE-FINISHED CLAD UNIT)PRE-FINISHED METALFASCIA (FLAT)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA("3-STEP")LAP SIDING (PAINT)912PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)ROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILLLAP SIDING @ UPPER GABLE END WALLS (PAINT)ASPHALT SINGLE ROOFING SYSTEM"3-STEP" FASCIADECORATIVE POST & BASEDOOR TRIM(PAINT)612612EQEQBUIDLING "A" HEIGHT21' - 10"612612PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)LAP SIDING @ UPPER GABLE END WALLS (PAINT)ASPHALT SINGLE ROOFING SYSTEM"3-STEP" FASCIADECORATIVE POST & BASEROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILLWALL FOOTING12" CMU FOUNDATION WALLFINISHED GRADE10" ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL (WAINSCOTE COLOR)8" ROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIAPRE-FINISHED METAL SOFFITASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEMPRE-ENGINEERED WOOD ROOF TRUSSESTYPICAL BEARING WALL HEIGHT14' - 0"612012345505102040051020400510204005102040Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.comAs indicatedPR-4EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS(BUILDING "A")20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateSOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "A"NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "A"EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING "A"WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING "A"TYPICAL WALL SECTION123451 CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 PROTECTIVE BOLLARDROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)METAL FASCIA (FLAT)ASPHALT SHINGLEROOFING SYSTEMTYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")TYPICAL OHD(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")ROOF STEP @ FIRE WALLROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)PROTECTIVE BOLLARDSTEP IN ROOF @ END UNITSPROTECTIVE BOLLARDROCK FACE CMU(FIELD COLOR)METAL FASCIA (FLAT)ASPHALT SHINGLEROOFING SYSTEMTYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")TYPICAL OHD(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")ROOF STEP @ FIRE WALLROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)PROTECTIVE BOLLARDSTEP IN ROOF @ END UNITS612612PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ ROOF (BEYOND)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ END GABLE .ROCK FACE CMU (FIELD COLOR)PROTECTIVE BOLLARDROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT)EQEQBUILDING "B" HEIGHT23' - 8"612612PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ ROOF (BEYOND)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ END GABLE .ROCK FACE CMU (FIELD COLOR)PROTECTIVE BOLLARDROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT)010204070010204070010204070010204070Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.com1" = 10'-0"PR-5EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS(BUILDING "B")20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateSOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "B"1NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "B"2EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING "B"3WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING "B"41 CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")ROOF STEPS @ FIRE BARRIERFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESS612612PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ ROOF (BEYOND)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ END GABLE .ROCK FACE CMU (FIELD COLOR)MASONRY SILL OVERROCK FACE WALL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT)EQEQBUILDING "C" HEIGHT23' - 6"612612PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ ROOF (BEYOND)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT) @ END GABLE .ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)MASONRY SILL(WAINSCOTE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT)010204070010204070010204070010204070MASONRY SILLROCK FACE CMUROCK FACE CMUMETAL FASCIAASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEMTYPICAL OHD(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")MASONRY SILLROCK FACE CMUROCK FACE CMUMETAL FASCIAASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEMROOF STEPS @FIRE BARRIERTYPICAL CLAD AWNINGWINDOW UNITFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESSScale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.com1" = 10'-0"PR-6EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS(BUILDING "C")20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateSOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "C"1NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "C"2EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING "C"3WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING "C"41CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 010204070010204070010204070010204070TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")TYPICAL OHD(PAINT "SOFT GRAY")ROCK FACE CMU(WAINSCOTE COLOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)ROCK FACE CMU (FIELD COLOR)MASONRY SILL (WAINSCOTE COLOR)ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEMFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESSASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEMPRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)ROCK FACE CMU (FIELD COLOR)TYPICAL CLAD AWNINGWINDOW UNITFDC DRY LINE FORREAR ACCESSROCK FACE CMUMASONRY SILLROCK FACE CMUPRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)LAP SIDING (PAINT)CONCRETE / MASONRYRETAINING WALLEQ EQBUILDING "D" HEIGHT21' - 7"612612ROCK FACE CMUMASONRY SILLROCK FACE CMUPRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA (FLAT)LAP SIDING (PAINT)CONCRETE / MASONRYRETAINING WALLScale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N STHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED VIA THE DESIGN/BUILD APPROACH BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5075 Holly Lane North -Unit 7Minneapolis, Minnesota 55446(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.com3/32" = 1'-0"PR-7EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS(BUILDING "D")20-004New Storage Facility forGARAGES TOO LLCAPR 20, 2021SDKHighway 55 - Corcoran, MnSITE PLAN REVIEW# Description DateSOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "D"1NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING "D"2EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING "D"3WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING "D"41 CITY REVIEW UPDATES 7-2-2021 MATERIALS DISPLAY BOARDNEW STORAGE FACILITY - GARAGES TOO , LLC0$18)$&785('6721(9(1((5&21&5(7(6721(6,//7<3,&$/75,0/$36,',1*62)),7)$6&,$75,067(363(&,$/)$6&,$29(5+($''225$63+$/76+,1*/(652&.)$&(&21&5(7(%/2&. :$,16&27(&21&5(7(6,//52&.)$&(&21&5(7(%/2&. ),(/'62)),7)$6&,$75,0&28175</('*(6721(:+($721%/(1' &8/785('6721(Z0,;('$&&(176,17(*5$/&2/25('&$67&21&5(7(6,//RU1$785$/&876721(6,///360$576,'(75,0 3$,17('6+(5:,1:,//,$066: 385(:+,7( /360$576,'(6,',1* 3$,17('6+(5:,1:,//,$066: /,*+7)5(1&+*5$< 35(),1,6+('%<29(5+($''225&203$1<25,76(48,9$/(17 ),1,6+('720$7&+6+(5:,1:,//,$066: 385(:+,7( /360$576,'(75,0 3$,17('6+(5:,1:,//,$066: 385(:+,7( :5$33('Z35(),1,6+('0(7$/720$7&+62)),762:(16&251,1*'85$7,21 $0%(5:5$33('Z35(),1,6+('0(7$/720$7&+62)),76,17(*5$/&2/25('81,76%<5&3%/2&. %5,&.25,76(48,9$/(17&$67/(*5(<&$67&21&5(7(6,//Z,17(*5$/&2/25720$7&+:$,16&27(,17(*5$/&2/25('81,76%<5&3%/2&. %5,&.25,76(48,9$/(17&+$5&2$/ WKP WAL-PAK 27, 32 and 46W LED WALL MOUNT LUMINAIRE S treetworks The Streetworks Wal-Pak Series of wall luminaires provides traditional architectural style with high performance energy efficient illumination. Rugged die-cast aluminum construction, stainless steel hardware along with a sealed and gasketed optical compartment make the Wal- Pak virtually impenetrable to contaminants. IP66 Rated. UL and cUL wet location listed. The Wal-Pak wall luminaire is ideal for pathway illumination, building entrances, vehicle ramps, schools, tunnels, stairways and loading docks. DESCRIPTIO N SPECIFICATION FEATURES Housing Rugged one-piece die-cast aluminum housing and hinged, removable die-cast aluminum door. One-piece silicone gasket seals the optical chamber. UL 1598 wet location listed and IP66 ingress protection rated. Not recommended for car wash applications. Electrical LED driver and related electrical components are hard mounted to the die-cast housing for optimal heat sinking and operating efficiency. Wiring is extended through a silicone gasket at the back of the housing. Three 1/2” threaded conduit entry points allow for thru-branch wiring. LED thermal management system incorporates both conduction and natural convection to transfer heat rapidly away from LED source. Integral LED electronic driver incorporates internal fusing designed to withstand a 6kV surge test and is Class 2 rated for 120-277V with an operating temperature of -40º to 55ºC. Wal-Pak LED systems maintain greater than 93% of the initial light output after 72,000 hours of operation. O ptical Highly reflective anodized aluminum reflectors provide high efficiency illumination. Optical assemblies include impact resistant borosilicate refractive glass, and full cutoff IESNA compliant configurations. Patented, solid state LED luminaires are thermally optimized with three lumen packages. D oor Assembly Single point, captive stainless steel hardware secures the removable hinged door allowing for ease of installation and maintenance. Door assembly is hinged at the bottom for easy removal and installation. Finish Finished in five-stage super TGIC polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness for superior protection against fade and wear. Standard color is bronze. Additional colors available in white, grey, bronze, black, dark platinum and graphite metallic. Consult your lighting representitive at Cooper Lighting Solutions for a complete selection of standard colors. Efficiency Standards Notice Select luminaires are manufactured to USA and California efficiency regulations. C ERTIFICATIO N DATA UL and cUL Wet Location Listed IP66 Rated 40°C Maximum Ambient Temperature External Supply Wiring 90°C Minimum Title 20 Compliant LM79 / LM80 Compliant E NERG Y DATA 120-277V 50/60Hz SHIPPING DATA Approximate Net Weight: 32-42 lbs. (15-19 kgs.) 16-5/8" [422mm] Small 11-3/8" [290mm]Small 15" [381mm] 10" [254mm] 16-5/8" [422mm] 10" [254mm] BOROSILICATE GLASS DOOR FULL CUTOFF DOOR DIMENSIONS Catalog #Type Date Project Comments Prepared by TD514004EN May 24, 2021 4:56 PM WKP6BLEDEDFC-7040 7-2-2021 Garages Too LLC Full light cutoff SDK Architects LLC LUMEN MAINTENANCECURRENT DRAW WKP WAL-PAK LUMEN MULTIPLIER O RDERING INFO RMATION P O WER AND LUMENS TD514004EN May 24, 2021 4:56 PM page 2 Sample Number: WKP3BLEDEUGL Product Family Lamp Wattage 1 Lamp Ty pe Driver Type Voltage 2 Door/Lens TypeColor WKP=Wal-Pak LED 3B=(3 Package), 27W 4B=(4 Package), 32W 6B=(6 Package), 46W LED=Solid State Light Emitting Diodes E=Electronic LED Dimming (0-10V) Driver 9=347V 3 8=480V 3 U=Universal (120-277V) GL=Borosilicate Glass Door FC=Full Cutoff Door AP=Grey BZ=Bronze BK=Black WH=White Options (Add as Suffix)Accessories (Order Separately) 7030=70 CRI / 3000K CCT 7040=70 CRI / 4000K CCT 5=Non NEMA Photocontrol (Must Specify Voltage) B=Two-Position Terminal Block WG/WPGL=Wire Guard Borosilicate Glass Lens Door WG/WPFC=Wire Guard Full Cutoff Door TR/WP=Tamper-resistant Screw and Bit VS/WPGL=Polycarbonate Vandal Shield for Borosilicate Glass Lens Door NOTES: 1. LED packages based on 70 CRI / 5000K package at 25°C ambient. 2.105°C Rated wire required for thru-branch wiring. Thru-branch wiring is rated for 40°C. Higher wattage thru-branch wiring is rated for use in 25°C ambient operating environments. 3.Not available with thru-branch wiring. LED will be supported with integral step down transformer. Catalog Number Lumens Power Consumption (Watts)B.U.G. Rating Correlated Color Temperature CCT (Kelvin) Color Rendering Index (CRI) Borosilicate Glass Door (GL) WKP3BLEDEDGL-7040 3,270 27W B1-U3-G1 4000K 73 WKP4BLEDEDGL-7040 4,160 32W B1-U3-G2 4000K 73 WKP6BLEDEDGL-7040 5,828 46W B1-U4-G4 4000K 73 WKP3BLEDEDGL 3,333 27W B1-U3-G1 5000K 72 WKP4BLEDEDGL 4,199 32W B1-U3-G3 5000K 73 WKP6BLEDEDGL 5,883 46W B1-U4-G4 5000K 73 Full Cutoff Door (FC) WKP3BLEDEDFC-7040 1,884 27W B1-U0-G1 4000K 72 WKP4BLEDEDFC-7040 2,239 32W B1-U0-G1 4000K 73 WKP6BLEDEDFC-7040 3,137 47W B1-U0-G1 4000K 73 WKP3BLEDEDFC 1,912 27W B1-U0-G1 5000K 72 WKP4BLEDEDFC 2,279 32W B1-U0-G1 5000K 73 WKP6BLEDEDFC 3,192 46W B1-U0-G1 5000K 73 Ambient Temperature Lumen Multiplier 10°C 1.07 15°C 1.04 25°C1 1.00 40°C0 0.94 Ambient Temperature TM-21 Lumen Maintenance (72,000 Hours)* Theoretical L70 (Hours 25°C>93%>340,000 40°C>92%>316,000 *Per TM-21 data. Light Engine 3B 4B 6B Nominal Power (Watts)r 27W 32W 46W Input Current @ 120V (A)0.24 0.28 0.40 Input Current @ 208V (A)0.14 0.18 0.2 3 Input Current @ 240V (A)0.13 0.15 0.20 Input Current @ 277V (A)0.11 0.13 0.18 Input Current @ 347V (A)0.09 0.11 0.15 Input Current @ 480V (A)0.10 0.12 0.14 Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Cooper Lighting Solutions 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 P: 770-486-4800 www.cooperlighting.com Project Catalog #Type Prepared by Notes Date PS517008EN page 1 April 6, 2021 4:55 PM Top Product Features •Lumen output in 1500, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000, 8000 lm •Color temperature in 2700K, 3000K, 3500K, 4000K CCT •CRI in 80 CRI or 90 CRI •Reflector distributions in Narrow, Medium, Wide, and Wall Wash with rotatable linear spread lens •Reflector finishes in Specular clear, semi-specular (haze), matte white, black baffle, and white baffle finishes Interactive Menu •Order Information page 2 •Product Specifications page 3 •Photometric Data page 4 •Energy & Performance Data page 6 •Connected Systems page 7 •Product Warranty Dimensional and Mounting Details Scale HC8 | HM8 | 81 8-inch downlight and wall wash 1500 lm 9’ [2.7m] 2000 lm 10’ [3.0m] 3000 lm 14’ [4.3m] 4000 lm 16’ [4.9m] 6000 lm 18’ [5.5m] 8000 lm 20’ [6.1m] WaveLinx Typical Applications Office • Education • Healthcare • Hospitality Nominal values for 15 - 20 footcandles at nadir. (CEILING THICKNESS) MAX MODULE HEIGHT (SEE TABLE) Ø 8-5/16” [212mm] (REFLECTOR INNER APERTURE) Ø 9-1/4” [235mm] (CEILING CUT OUT) Ø 9-3/4” [248mm] (TRIM FLANGE) 3-1/2” [89mm] 1/2” [13mm] (DRIVER HEIGHT) 26-3/8” [671mm] 11” [280mm] HM8 LED module HC8 Remodel (hangar bars removded) additional product diagrams 4VSHYGX'IVXMƼGEXMSR Product Features SDK Architects LLC 7-2-2021 Garages Too LLC Corcoran, MN see below From:Lisa Wyffels To:Brad Martens Subject:Garages Too Date:Thursday, August 5, 2021 9:35:50 AM Hi Brad, I apologize for the late input but I am not sure I will be able to log into the planning meeting tonight so I wanted to give a little input for the Garages Too project. If you could pass this along to the commissioners that would be great. I am concerned about the additional traffic this will add so close to the Rolling Hills Road entrance and the potential safety hazards it will add to driving the portion of hwy 55. It has become increasingly difficult to turn out onto 55 and it will continue to get worse as more people move out that direction. I have seen so many unsafe things happen because people get sick of waiting or they simply don't see certain vehicles coming. Also, I presume a good portion of vehicles entering and exiting will be towing trailers of some kind. Having these vehicles turn into there will cause even more backups and accidents without the addition of turn lanes. It is not uncommon for traffic to be backed up all the way from 19 to Rolling Hills or even farther past that during higher traffic times. Again, unsafe things happen when vehicles try to turn during those backups. Increased traffic will aggravate that even more. Having this land rezoned feels premature given the unknowns of that area. Correct me if I am wrong but there isn't a specific timeline for adding in that frontage road. We also don't know when they will decide to widen 55 in which case they plan to make Rolling Hills a right in and right out only. This will force anyone needing to go east on 55 to take Horseshoe Trail to Willow. Does the city plan to pave Horseshoe Trail at that time? Thank you, Lisa Wyffels 1 Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:FW: Letter of Support-Garages Too From: Jon Rausch/USA <Jon.Rausch@cushwake.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 10:18 AM To: Kendra Lindahl, AICP <KLindahl@landform.net>; Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov>; Brad Martens (bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us) <bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us>; Kenton Torve (ktorve@wenck.com) <ktorve@wenck.com> Subject: Letter of Support‐Garages Too Kendra/Brad/Natalie/Kent: Please share with the city council regarding my support of the Garages Too project. I am the owner of the 55 acre property immediately west of Mr. Sherber’s project. I want to express my support for this development. I expressly like the fact that the city is willing to allow his project on well and septic. Additionally, I like the flexibility the council is having over building materials. I think this project will ignite some development. We hope to bring a project forward in the near future that will feed off of his and increase the tax base within the city of Corcoran. Thank you , JR Jon Rausch Executive Director Brokerage Services www.landmnwi.com Mobile: +1 612 685 8288 jon.rausch@cushwake.com Please see our website to view our privacy notice / statement. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 8b. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: August 19, 2021 for the August 26, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Sketch Plan for 23185 County Road 10 (city file 21-033) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:October 16, 2021 1.Description of Request The applicant, Nate Kariniemi, is requesting an opportunity to appear before the City Council to solicit informal comments on a sketch plan for a proposed subdivision of 23185 County Road 10. The proposal includes subdividing the property into three commercial lots on the west side of the site and 10 rural residential lots on the east side of the site, with a large outlot dividing the east and west sides of the site. 2.Context The site is an existing 124.5-acre lot with a single family residential structure on the northeast corner of the site. There are 13 development rights on the property. Zoning and Land Use The site is guided Rural/Ag Residential in the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned RR (Rural Residential). A shoreland overlay district runs through the center of the property for Rush Creek. Surrounding Properties The properties to the east, south and west are guided Rural/Ag Residential and zoned RR (Rural Residential). The properties to the north are guided Rural Service/Commercial and zoned CR (Rural Commercial). The public works facility is surrounded by this property on the western portion of the site. Natural Characteristics of the Site Rush Creek runs through the center of the site. There are natural plant communities on the site identified as a high-quality maple/basswood area on the Natural Resource Inventory Areas Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Further, multiple wetlands are shown on Hennepin County’s Natural Resources mapping software as shown on the Site Location map. Kariniemi Sketch Plan (21-033) 2 August 26, 2021 3. ANALYSIS: Sketch Plan The sketch plan process provides an opportunity for the applicant to get information from the City that can be incorporated into a formal development application. The next steps would be: 1. Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat 2. Application for Final Plat (and development contract) The plans show a road connection to the site to the east. The formal plan application must include a ghost plat or concept plan for that portion of the site. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning The proposed land use and zoning for the site will require a change on the western portion of the site from Rural/Ag Residential to Rural Service/Commercial for the land use and Rural Residential to Rural Commercial for the zoning. This is a policy change and the Council has a higher level of discretion when reviewing these types of applications. The proposed commercial land would abut commercial land on the north and the public works garage on the south. The change would allow additional commercial opportunities in the City. • City Council should provide feedback on this request. Lot Standards The sketch plan appears to show compliance with the RR and CR standards, which require the following minimum standards: RR (Rural Residential) CR (Rural Commercial) Minimum Lot Area 2 acres 2.5 acres Minimum Lot Width 200 feet 100 feet Minimum Lot Depth 300 feet 200 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet 100 feet Front, From all other streets 50 feet 50 feet Front Porch (≤ 120 square feet) 40 feet n/a Side 25 feet 20 feet Rear 25 feet 20 feet Adjacent to Residential n/a 50 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet Kariniemi Sketch Plan (21-033) 3 August 26, 2021 RR (Rural Residential) CR (Rural Commercial) Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage n/a 50% *Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. **Minimum separation between structures on adjacent parcels shall be 15 feet. The shoreland overlay district standards for setbacks, structure height and impervious surface apply to the area within 300 feet of the ordinary high-water level of Rush Creek. This appears to affect the rear of Lots 5-10 of the residential parcels. The applicant must comply with the shoreland requirements in Section 1050.020 of the Zoning Ordinance, which requires a buffer adjacent to the creek and additional limitations on building height within the overlay district. Development Rights The site has 13 development rights. The applicant’s proposal shows three assigned to the commercial lots (Lots C-1, C-2 and C-3) and 10 residential lots. The plan shows a 65.1-acre Outlot A with no development rights. Sidewalks and Trails The 2040 Comprehensive Plan has a proposed on-road trail shown along northern boundary of this property on County Road 10. Adequate right of way will need to be dedicated for this trail. A proposed off-road trail is shown along Rush Creek. If the park is not accepted and Outlot A is absorbed into the adjacent lots an easement for this trail should be acquired with the plat. City Council should discuss whether the trail should access directly from the County Road 10 on-road trail or provide an access between two of the residential properties, such as Lots 9 and 10 and whether a connection to the CR 19 trail should be planned. Parks The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies an open space community park search area on the southeastern portion of this property along with an athletic search area on the western part of the property. Recently, the athletic fields were added to the community park at the County Road 10 and 50 intersection. The Parks and Trails Commission has indicated that the community park satisfies athletic park needs for the foreseeable future, but the Council may wish to comment. If the Park is accepted, then Outlot A can remain in place. If the park is not accepted the City does not allow unbuildable outlots to remain unless it is part of an Open Space & Preservation plat. “All remnants of land which are below the minimum lot size or which are otherwise unbuildable must be added to adjacent lots and shall not be platted as an unusable outlot or parcel.” The lots surrounding Outlot A should be extended to incorporate the area shown as Outlot A into the adjacent lots. Kariniemi Sketch Plan (21-033) 4 August 26, 2021 Transportation/Access The applicant is proposing two accesses with one serving the residential lots and one serving the proposed commercial lots. The residential lots will be accessed from a public road extending from County Road 10. The commercial lots will be accessed from the new proposed roadway extending from County Road 19, which will also provide the public works facility with access. Utilities The entire site is located outside the MUSA and will be served with well and septic. Ponding Stormwater ponding can be provided on site in compliance with local and state requirements. Floodplain The site has 100-year floodplain generally surrounding Rush Creek. The applicant will need to comply with the requirements of Section 1050.030 of the Zoning Ordinance Wetlands There are a number of wetlands on site. The applicant must submit a wetland delineation for review and approval by the City as the LGU for the WCA. If wetland impacts are proposed additional applications for mitigation would be required. The applicant must comply with the wetland buffer and setback requirements in Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. Summary The proposal appears to comply with or have the ability to comply with ordinance requirements. 4. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss the sketch plan and provide the applicant with informal comments. Any opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the City Council are considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. Kariniemi Sketch Plan (21-033) 5 August 26, 2021 Attachments 1. Site Location Map 2. City Engineer’s Memo dated August 17, 2021 3. Applicant Narrative dated June 18, 2021 4. Sketch Plan dated June 18, 2021 5. Official Zoning Map 6. 2040 Future Land Use 7. Parks and Trails Plan 8. Natural Resource Inventory 9. Wetland Locations and Classifications Hennepin County Property Map Date: 8/18/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 800 feet PARCEL ID: 1811923110002 OWNER NAME: Willow 1 Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 23185 Co Rd No 10, Corcoran MN 55374 PARCEL AREA: 124.54 acres, 5,424,987 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: SALE DATA: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $940,400 TAX TOTAL: $10,867.94 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $1,235,600 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, City Engineer Project: Karineimi_Roehlke Concept Date: August 17, 2021 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following document: 1. Concept Plan on Outlot A, Roehlke Addition by Otto and Associates, 6-18-21 a. Project shows ten residential lots (CR 10), three commercial lots (CR 19) and a 65 acre Outlot A. Comments: General: 1. Comments provided are high level comments based on the concept plan schematic provided. Additional comments should be anticipated on future submittals on the details of the development. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the proposed plans are subject to additional planning, zoning, public safety, and all other applicable codes and standards of the City of Corcoran, NPDES, WMO, Hennepin County, etc. 3. Adjacent site to northeast is historical site (Burschville School) and may receive additional attention and protection during construction. Plat: 1. The applicant shall show all drainage and utility easements and all platting requirements met per the City Code. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided as standard per City requirements. 2. Easements should be provided over all infrastructure used for the conveyance and treatment of stormwater. 3. Easements should be provided over any/all public infrastructure as applicable. 4. All existing easement, if any, should be provided to the City for review. Vacation of existing easements requires a City process. 5. Project shows a ROW connection to the east between Lots 3 and 4, City may require paving the street stub. a. ROW stub may need turnaround to meet City requirements. 6. Ghost plat parcel to east to ensure ROW is in proper location. 7. Access to Outlot A shall be provided. August 17, 2021 Kariniemi_Roehlke Concept Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 Transportation 1. County is permitting agency for CR 10. Turn lanes may be required and would be constructed under a City project with developer providing escrow. 2. County is permitting agency for access to commercial lots along CR 19. 3. The need for fire access around any commercial buildings shall be determined by Public Safety at time of building permit. Stormwater 1. Stormwater management appears manageable for the residential lots 2. Stormwater management for commercial lot C-1 appears challenging due to wetland, required buffer, etc. 3. A stormwater management plan shall be provided to confirm that stormwater management is in accordance with City of Corcoran and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Standards. 4. The City’s Stormwater Guidelines shall be used for stormwater systems and modeling. 5. WMO typically requires that the model P8 or a similar calculation to demonstrate that the site meets the total phosphorous and total suspended solids reduction standards for all treatment practices. 6. Provide a hydraulic stormwater model to ensure that the proposed development meets all required rate control standards and does not adversely impact surrounding properties. 7. Adjacent D&D site will direct some drainage to its southeast corner, however this is minimal and will be reviewed for potential of erosion. Prior ComLink site directed more drainage to this location, so D&D has lessened the impact to Roehlke parcel. 8. If filtration is required by WMO for the site, the City strongly prefers a NURP pond with filter bench (offset to one side of the pond) be used with adequate maintenance access. 9. Incorporate any turn lane drainage (CR 10 and CR 19) into the site’s SWMP and WMO permitting. Fire Protection, Private Wells and Septics 1. Public Safety should review the need for any future fire protection within the property. 2. If not used with the current development, any wells which service the existing property should be abandoned by a licensed contractor. 3. Any existing septic system should be abandoned by a licensed contractor. End of Memo !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!! !!!!!!!!!! !! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!! ! !!! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!î î î s s òñð òñð ñ ñ ï ï î î s ñ ï ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STI E G R D WILLOW DRIVEHACKAMORE ROADTRAIL HAVEN ROADCAIN ROADOAKDALE D R STREHLER ROAD PI O N E E R T R COUNTY ROAD 117 ROLLLING HILLS RDLARKIN RD TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CITY OF GREENFIELDCITY OF MAPLE GROVESCOTT LAKEBECHTOLD ROAD$+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUS H C R E E K Official Zoning Map 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Zoning Districts: UR Urban Reserve RR Rural Residential RSF-1 Single Family Residential 1 RSF-2 Single Family Residential 2 RSF-3 Single and Two Family Residential 3 RMF-1 Medium Density Residential RMF-2 Mixed Residential RMF-3 High Density Residential MP Manufactured Home Park P-I Public / Institutional TCR Transitional Rural Commercial CR Rural Commercial C-1 Neighborhood Commercial C-2 Community Commercial DMU Downtown Mixed Use GMU General Mixed Use BP Business District I-1 Light Industrial PUD Planned Unit Development ï Cemetery î ChurchsGolf Course ñ Government Building òñð Public Park !! !!!2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area City Limit Open Water Shoreland Overlay District Adopted June 2011 19 10 30 116 101 50 19 10 ± Updated September 2020 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u sh CreekRushCreek South F o rk R u sh Creek SouthForkRu shC reekThe method and timing of regional wastewater service to be determined through future study. 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 4/28/2021 1/22/2023 1/22/2023 1/21/2021 10/2020 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: \\MSPFSV02\DesignDepot\Library\Software\GIS\Client\City of Corcoran\City wide maps\2040 Future Land Use.mxd Date: 6/16/2020 Time: 10:58:05 AM User: KShay Rural/Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public Parks/Open Space Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open Water Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Future Study Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers %Trailhead Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Cook Lake 456710 456750 456719 456730 County Road 116Oakdale Dr B r i d l e Pa t hJeffreyLnAbileneLnTrail LnHunters Rdg County Road 30HeatherLn Pio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Robert LnHor s eshoeBendD r Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Gleason P k w yWillow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19ES t Homestead Trl Maple Hill RdCain RdRolling Hills RdSundanceRdCountry Rd Mohawk DrElm StLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Cain Pl 6 5 t h Pl N Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d County R oad 1 1 7 Stie g R d Bechtold RdKalk RdSchutte Rd Meister RdFoxValleyDr M y s t iq u e DrHageDr 93rd Ave N Sc hut t e P lBrandywineRdChisholmT r lTessmer Rd HighBluffLnWinchesterTrl JubertLnR u shC reekRushCreek CountyDitchN u m b e rS ixteenCo u n t y Ditch N u mberThreeSouthFor k R u s h C r e e k NP NP NP NP NP NP NP ASA ASA ASA ASA OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP OSP 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Parks and Trails Map.mxd Date: 1/15/2019 Time: 1:22:31 PM User: ShuJC0243 Map 5-1Parks and Trails Plan Existing Parks and TrailsRegional TrailExisting On Road TrailCity ParkTrailheadPrivate Park/Open Space Proposed Parks and TrailsProposed On Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed Off Road Trail outside 2040 Development AreaNeighborhood ParkCommunity ParkGreenway CorridorMunicipal Boundaries2040 MUSAFuture MUSA Expansion AreaParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open WaterWetlands NP 79 City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C reekRushCreek South F o r k R u sh Creek SouthForkR u sh C r eek2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Natural Resource Inventory Areas.mxd Date: 1/7/2019 Time: 1:10:39 PM User: ShuJC0243 ^_Natural Community !(Rare Species OccurenceHigh Quality Natural Community Natural Plant Communities WetlandsWet PrairieEmergentShrubFloodplain ForestOpen WaterFlood Plain (Reed Canary Dominant) UplandsSavanna/PastureMaple/BasswoodOak ForestDisturbed WoodlandOld FieldMunicipal BoundaryParcel BoundariesStreamsLake/Open Water Map 1-7Natural Resource Inventory Areas Note: Due to limitations of map scale, distribution and proportion of NaturalCommunity types within each colored area are approximate.Source:Natural Plant Communities, Rare Species Occurence (Natural Resource Inventory andManagement Plan, Nov. 2001, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates) 27 City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPio n e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Ro a d 1 0 Horseshoe Trl Co u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersR d Stie g R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd Morin Lake Scott Lake Jubert Lake Goose Lake Cook Lake R u s h C reekRushCreek South F o r k Ru sh Creek South Fork RushCreekRushCreek 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: L:\2294\100\2040CompPlan\Wetland Locations and Classifications.mxd Date: 1/7/2019 Time: 3:19:04 PM User: ShuJC0243 1 - Seasonally Flooded Basin or Flat2 - Wet Meadow3 - Shallow Marsh4 - Deep Marsh5 - Shallow Open Water6 - Shrub Swamp7 - Wooded Swamp8 - BogsMunicipal BoundaryStreamsParcel BoundariesLake/Open Water Map 1-11Wetland Locations and Classifications Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (Minnesota Departmentof Natural Resources 2009-2014) 35 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 8c. Council Meeting: August 26, 2021 Prepared By: Natalie Davis Topic: Sign Ordinance Update Action Required: Direction Summary: Campaign Signs At the April 8, 2021, City Council meeting, there was discussion in favor of eliminating the Campaign Sign Enforcement Policy prior to elections. The current policy calls for enforcement to respond, “on a complaint basis and to obvious violations,” specifically when campaign signs are placed in the Public, City, and County right-of-way; when campaign signs are placed within 10’ of the property line; and when signs present a sight-line/visibility hazard. Minnesota State Statute 211B.045 states: All noncommercial signs of any size may be posted in any number beginning 46 days before the state primary in a state general election year until ten days following the state general election. Municipal ordinances may regulate the size and number of noncommercial signs at other times. Allowing any number of signs of any size in the right-of-way and visibility triangles can obstruct the view and flow of vehicle and pedestrian traffic. While Minnesota State Statute does not allow cities to regulate the size and amount of campaign signs, the statute is silent on cities regulating the location of such signs. In completing a survey of 10 nearby cities, 8 cities did not allow for campaign signs to be placed in the right-of- way. Rogers allows signs in the right-of-way if approval is granted by the applicable road authority. Plymouth allows campaign signs to be placed in the public boulevard, but several conditions apply to this allowance. While this strategy may allow for more sign placement options, its level of complexity could prove more time consuming for Code Enforcement. Plymouth still does not allow for signs to interfere with vehicular and pedestrian traffic, but whether a sign obstructs visibility becomes more subjective with this approach. It is worth noting that however Corcoran chooses to regulate the treatment of campaign signs in the right-of-way, this would not impact how the County chooses to enforce campaign signs placed in County right-of-way. Corcoran City Code also does not allow for signs to be erected in a site visibility triangle (Chapter 84.04, Subd., 2c.). Section 1060.090, Subd. 2 of the Corcoran City Code provides the following definition: Visibility from any street or driveway shall be unobstructed above a height of 3 feet, measured from where both street or driveway center lines intersect within a triangular area described as beginning at the intersection of the projected curb line of two intersection streets or drives, thence 30 feet along one curb lines, thence diagonally to a point 30 feet from the point of beginning along the other curb line. All surveyed cities had additional requirements to ensure that campaign signs do not interfere with visibility. A majority of the cities surveyed do not allow signs that interfere with visibility triangles or “reasonable visibility”, but two cities allowed for signs to be located in these areas by permit if staff found they would not interfere with vehicular and pedestrian traffic. A permitting process once again allows for more sign location options, but this would require staff time to process permits as well as leaving the determination of what signs may cause a sight-line/visibility hazard up to staff discretion. Ultimately, staff prefers to have a clear set of standards for campaign signs that applies to everyone and allows for enforcement when there is a public safety need. When standards are clearly defined it results in more objective enforcement, while more flexible standards can result in more subjective enforcement. There is concern that residents and candidates may feel they are being treated unfairly when staff uses their discretion to remove signs that are believed to interfere with vehicle and pedestrian traffic without a measurable standard established. This is why staff recommends proceeding with defined enforcement standards for right-of-way and visibility triangles. Construction Signs Recent discussions between staff and developers have drawn attention to the possible need to re-evaluate how construction signs are treated in the City Code. Currently, construction signs are not separated from other temporary signs. Chapter 84.06, Subd. 1(h-i) states: h) Temporary signs may be located on a property for continuous periods not to exceed 30 days. No more than 1 such sign will be allowed per parcel. i) No property shall be allowed more than 4 such periods in any 12-month period. These time limitations may not make sense for multi-phase construction projects such as Tavera or Bellwether. Additionally, there also seems to be a need for construction sites to be allowed an additional sign at the entrance of construction sites that provides construction site rules. Construction site rules are required by OSHA to be posted on site and a number of developers have taken to posting on sign at the entrance where is it immediately visible. A photo example of such signs is attached to this report. A second sign of up to 32’ feet that provides construction site rules may be reasonable. It is important to note that the City must be mindful of regulating the content of signs as it can interfere with 1st Amendment rights and the concept of “content neutrality” stemming from a court decision made by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2015 (Reed v. Town of Gilbert). To move forward with these changes, two additional definitions under Chapter 84.02 would need to be added for constructions signs. The proposed definitions are as follows: Construction Sign – A sign placed at a construction site which may include components such as identifying the project or the name of the architect, engineer, contractor, developer, financier, other involved parties, and construction site rules. Construction Site – A collective of any properties under construction for a residential, commercial, or industrial development. The following changes would also need to be made to the current Sign code: 84.06: Temporary Signs. Temporary use of portable or movable signs shall be allowed in addition to the sign limitations of this ordinance. 1. General Provisions. All temporary signs, with the exception of construction signs, shall comply with the following standards: […] 2. Construction Signs. Construction signs shall comply with the following standards: a. Construction signs shall comply with Section 84.04 (General Provisions). b. Each construction site will be allowed up to two signs, each limited to a maximum of 32’ square feet in area. c. A permit shall be obtained from the Code Compliance Official, or his or her designee, for placement of each such signs, except signs under 8 square feet in area shall not be required to obtain a permit but shall be subject to the two-sign limit. d. Construction signs must be located on the construction site’s primary entrance to the development. e. Construction signs can be located on the construction site until: i. 90% of the building permits for a residential development have been issued. ii. A certificate of occupancy has been issued for a commercial or industrial development. Financial/Budget: Updating the Sign Code as recommended is not anticipated to impact the budget. Campaign Sign Options: 1. Keep the current Campaign Sign Enforcement Policy as-is, and the current treatment of campaign signs in the City Code. 2. Amend the City Code and Campaign Sign Enforcement Policy to allow for additional flexibility of the location of campaign signs (i.e. in the right-of-way, within 10’ of the property line, and/or within the visibility triangle), either by right or by permit, as long as these signs do not obstruct vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Construction Sign Options: 1. Keep treating construction signs as every other type of temporary signs. 2. Move forward with the proposed language changes to allow for additional flexibility for construction signs. 3. Suggest additional language changes. Recommendation: Staff recommends continuing with the current Campaign Sign Enforcement Policy and treatment of campaign signs within the City Code. Staff also recommends moving forward with the proposed language changes providing additional flexibility for Construction Signs. Council Action: Direct staff on how to proceed with potential changes to the Campaign Sign Enforcement Policy as well as changes to how the City Code treats campaign signs and construction Signs. Attachments: 1. 2018 Campaign Sign Enforcement Policy 2. Campaign Sign Comparison Table of 10 Cities 3. Photo Examples of Construction Signs www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Administrative Offices Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 Phone: 763-420-8966 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 CITY OF CORCORAN ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES FOR CAMPAIGN SIGNS ♦ The City will respond on a complaint basis and to obvious violations. ♦ Complaints will be directed to Code Compliance Official at (763) 400-7033. ♦ Signs in Public/City Right-of-Way: Campaign signs in the right-of-way will be removed after 24 hour notification to candidate. The signs will be kept at City Hall for three days, then will be disposed of properly. ♦ Signs in County Right-of-Way: The City will handle in the same manner as signs in city street right-of-way. ♦ Sign Violations Other Than in Right-of-Way: The City will contact the candidate or property owner and notify them of the violation and request correction immediately. ♦ Signs will be removed immediately if they present a sight-line/visibility hazard. ♦ The identification of any person reporting a sign violation is confidential. City Code Chapter 84: Signs 84.07 EXEMPT SIGNS. 8. Noncommercial signs may be posted beginning 46 days before the state primary in a state general election year until ten days following the state general election, per the standards of Minnesota §211B.045, as may be amended. 84.04 GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1. Conformance to Codes. All signs shall conform to the provisions of this ordinance and the provisions of the Building Code and of any other applicable ordinance or regulations within the City of Corcoran. 2. Location a) Setbacks. All signs shall be set back 10 feet from the property lines. b) Projections Over Public Ways. Except as provided for elsewhere in this ordinance, private signs may not encroach or overhang the public right-of-way and no sign shall be attached to any utility pole, light standard, street tree or any other public facility located within the public right -of-way. c) Traffic Visibility. No sign or sign structure shall be erected in a site visibility triangle, as defined by Section 1060.090, Subd. 2, in such a manner as to obstruct free and clear vision, nor at any location where by its position, shape, or color it may interfere with or obstruct the view of or be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal, or device. Signs over County or State Highways are not permitted. Campaign Signs City Comparison ChartCity Allows Campaign Signs in ROW Allow Signs in Visibility Triangle NotesBrooklyn Park No NoDayton No NoRogers Yes‐ see notes. No ‐ see notes.Allowed in ROW if approval granted by the roadway authority.Signs cannot be placed within 10' of a driveway.Medina No NoGreenfield No By permit ‐ see notes.Signs within a clear‐view triangle can be approved if staff finds it doesn't interfere with vehicle and pedestrian traffic.Maple Grove No NoSigns cannot obstruct the vision of drivers or pedestrians. Signs cannot obscure visibility of traffic control devices.Independence No By permit ‐ see notes.Requires sign permit if within 50' of any street, official traffic device, intersection, driveway, or crosswalk. Can be approved if staff finds it doesn't interfere with vehicle and pedestrian traffic.Loretto No NoHanover NoSigns cannot conflict with traffic signs or signals.PlymouthYes with several conditions ‐ see notes.No ‐ see notes.Such signs may be placed within the public boulevard directly abutting a private property upon consent of the landowner. Such signs shall not be placed:1) Within the traveled roadway; or2) Within center medians / traffic islands; or3) On any public trail or sidewalk; or4) Within a public boulevard that is located between a public trail or sidewalk and any abutting public street/roadway; or 5) on public park proprty; or6) on any city‐, county‐, state‐, or federally‐owned property.Such signs shall be set back at least 1' from public trails and sidewalks. If there is no public trail or sidwalk, such signs shall be set back at least 4' from the back‐of‐curb or public streets/roadways, or in the absense of curbing, such signs shall be set back at leat 4' from the outermost limits of the road bed including any shoulders. Additionally, placement of such signs shall not impede safety by obstructing vision of pedestrians, bicycles, or motor vehicle operations. Signs cannot interfere with properly functioning of a traffic sign or with reasonable visibility at a street intersection. Construction Sign Example STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 9a. Council Meeting: August 26, 2021 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson Topic: Corcoran Trail Street Improvements – Award Bid Action Required: Approval Summary: On August 19, 2021, the engineering team opened bids for the improvement project as outlined in the attached memo. The low bid was $510,438.35 by Park Construction Company. Revised project costs are as follows: •Engineering design to date ~$50,000.00 •Construction $510,438.35 •Construction Admin incl independent field testing $30,000.00 $590,438.35* *Approximately $56,000 over previous estimate primarily from additional street draintile requested under the road. Staff plans to revisit the draintile consideration and limit the quantity installed because of higher than anticipated unit prices for that item. Financial/Budget: The improvements would be funded through a combination of the following: •Special assessments estimated at $176,400 •Local participation estimated at $414,038.35 o 2021 General Budget Asphalt Maintenance/Patching line item in the amount of $175,000 o Asphalt Fund in the amount of $239,038.35 The existing Asphalt Fund has a balance of $969,406.99. If the Corcoran Trail project is approved, the following is estimated to be allocated permanently: • Corcoran Trail Project: $239,038.35 • Dayton Parkway Interchange Commitment: $250,000.00 • Total Committed: $489,038.35 In addition, the City would likely need to cover the costs of the assessments that would be paid back over ten years. Assuming that not a single property owner pays in advance, the following would be a temporary allocation of the Asphalt Fund to be paid back over ten years: •Appaloosa Woods Project:$185,400.00 •Corcoran Trail Project:$176,400.00 •Total:$361,800.00 Page 2 Options: 1. Authorize a Notice of Award for the Corcoran Trail Street Improvements to Park Construction Company. 2. Decline. Recommendation: Staff recommends authorizing a Notice of Award for the Corcoran Trail Street Improvements to Park Construction Company. Council Action: Consider a motion to authorize a Notice of Award for the Corcoran Trail Street Improvements to Park Construction Company. Attachments: 1. Corcoran Trail Street Improvements Award Bid Engineering Memo 2. Bid Tabulation Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Nick Wyers, PE File: 227704153 Date: August 20, 2021 Subject: Bid Results – Corcoran Trail Street Improvements Council Action Requested Staff is recommending Council authorize a Notice of Award for the construction of the Corcoran Trail Street Improvements. The Corcoran Trail Street Improvements will provide a paved surface and maintenance improvements for the residents on Corcoran Trail Bid Results Six bids were received on Thursday, August 19th for the Corcoran Trail Street Improvements. Bid results are summarized below and details are in the attached table. Contractor Bid Amount • Park Construction Company. $ 510,438.35 • New Look Contracting $ 512,384.00 • Northwest $ 526,539.69 • Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $ 532,474.00 • Duininck, Inc. $ 557,469.25 • Northdale Construction $ 612,191.74 The low bidder was Park Construction Company. with a bid of $ 510,438.35. The Engineer’s estimate was $464,650.00. The authorization of work includes construction, field compliance testing, and engineering management costs estimated at an additional $30,000. The design, permitting, and surveying costs to date for feasibility study, detailed stormwater modeling, resident meetings, design and bidding are approximately $50,000. Stormwater analysis, modeling, and design to improve drainage increased the engineering effort and was represented in the construction bid costs for culverts, draintile, ditching and stormwater components. Prior to the August 26th Council meeting, Stantec Consulting Services will reach out to Park Construction Company and confirm their commitment to the bid. Funding Funding is through special assessments and local participation. Engineer’s Recommendation The bids were competitive, therefore, Stantec recommends that the project be awarded to Park Construction Company for $510,438.35. BID TABULATION CITY OF CORCORAN CORCORAN TRAIL STREET IMPROVEMENTS 227704153 08/19/2021 Bid Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price BASE BID: 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $22,030.00 22,030.00$ 43,900.00$ 43,900.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 54,530.00$ 54,530.00$ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $2,190.00 2,190.00$ 985.00$ 985.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$ 3 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LF 165 $10.00 1,650.00$ 15.50$ 2,557.50$ 15.00$ 2,475.00$ 25.00$ 4,125.00$ 4 REMOVE DRIVEWAY CULVERT LF 210 $10.00 2,100.00$ 15.50$ 3,255.00$ 15.00$ 3,150.00$ 25.00$ 5,250.00$ 5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 385 $7.00 2,695.00$ 10.50$ 4,042.50$ 9.00$ 3,465.00$ 4.00$ 1,540.00$ 6 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 90 $9.00 810.00$ 14.50$ 1,305.00$ 18.00$ 1,620.00$ 6.00$ 540.00$ 7 SALVAGE & RESPREAD DRIVEWAY SURFACING AGGREGATE SY 130 $14.00 1,820.00$ 11.80$ 1,534.00$ 15.00$ 1,950.00$ 14.65$ 1,904.50$ 8 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SY 11500 $2.50 28,750.00$ 1.50$ 17,250.00$ 1.20$ 13,800.00$ 0.98$ 11,270.00$ 9 CLEARING & GRUBBING LS 1 $5,000.00 5,000.00$ 7,070.00$ 7,070.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 11,500.00$ 11,500.00$ 10 ROADWAY PREPARATION RD ST 40.5 $300.00 12,150.00$ 225.00$ 9,112.50$ 180.00$ 7,290.00$ 195.00$ 7,897.50$ 11 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 600 $3.00 1,800.00$ 2.75$ 1,650.00$ 5.50$ 3,300.00$ 5.00$ 3,000.00$ 12 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) TON 1310 $75.00 98,250.00$ 74.70$ 97,857.00$ 82.00$ 107,420.00$ 71.20$ 93,272.00$ 13 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) TON 1750 $70.00 122,500.00$ 64.30$ 112,525.00$ 68.00$ 119,000.00$ 65.44$ 114,520.00$ 14 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2 TON 155 $40.00 6,200.00$ 41.10$ 6,370.50$ 47.00$ 7,285.00$ 42.50$ 6,587.50$ 15 EXCAVATE, LOAD, AND HAUL RECLAIM AGGREGATE CY 650 $15.00 9,750.00$ 12.90$ 8,385.00$ 20.00$ 13,000.00$ 16.05$ 10,432.50$ 16 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 100 $20.00 2,000.00$ 39.50$ 3,950.00$ 33.00$ 3,300.00$ 38.10$ 3,810.00$ 17 SALVAGE & PLACE RECLAIM AGGREGATE CY 50 $8.00 400.00$ 50.30$ 2,515.00$ 25.00$ 1,250.00$ 9.92$ 496.00$ 18 6" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LF 860 $15.00 12,900.00$ 39.00$ 33,540.00$ 40.00$ 34,400.00$ 31.56$ 27,141.60$ 19 8" SOLID PVC SCH 40 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 85 $30.00 2,550.00$ 58.20$ 4,947.00$ 45.00$ 3,825.00$ 29.24$ 2,485.40$ 20 8" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LF 365 $15.00 5,475.00$ 44.70$ 16,315.50$ 65.00$ 23,725.00$ 48.89$ 17,844.85$ 21 CLEANOUT W/ THREADED CAP EA 3 $300.00 900.00$ 1,150.00$ 3,450.00$ 950.00$ 2,850.00$ 915.00$ 2,745.00$ 22 27" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN EA 2 $2,000.00 4,000.00$ 3,610.00$ 7,220.00$ 2,350.00$ 4,700.00$ 954.43$ 1,908.86$ 23 18" RC PIPE STORM SEWER CLASS V LF 42 $60.00 2,520.00$ 63.90$ 2,683.80$ 78.00$ 3,276.00$ 69.65$ 2,925.30$ 24 21" RC PIPE STORM SEWER CLASS V LF 125 $65.00 8,125.00$ 74.30$ 9,287.50$ 78.00$ 9,750.00$ 88.89$ 11,111.25$ 25 24" RC PIPE STORM SEWER CLASS V LF 121 $75.00 9,075.00$ 90.80$ 10,986.80$ 107.00$ 12,947.00$ 118.75$ 14,368.75$ 26 18" RC FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASHGUARD EA 2 $1,500.00 3,000.00$ 1,880.00$ 3,760.00$ 1,915.00$ 3,830.00$ 1,701.85$ 3,403.70$ 27 21" RC FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASHGUARD EA 4 $1,750.00 7,000.00$ 2,130.00$ 8,520.00$ 2,400.00$ 9,600.00$ 2,137.25$ 8,549.00$ 28 24" RC FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASHGUARD EA 4 $2,000.00 8,000.00$ 2,290.00$ 9,160.00$ 2,800.00$ 11,200.00$ 3,455.47$ 13,821.88$ 29 15" CMP STORM SEWER LF 165 $35.00 5,775.00$ 55.50$ 9,157.50$ 65.00$ 10,725.00$ 60.34$ 9,956.10$ 30 15" CMP FLARED END SECTION EA 8 $250.00 2,000.00$ 618.00$ 4,944.00$ 425.00$ 3,400.00$ 238.00$ 1,904.00$ 31 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CY 60 $75.00 4,500.00$ 142.00$ 8,520.00$ 110.00$ 6,600.00$ 100.00$ 6,000.00$ 32 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 120 $100.00 12,000.00$ 94.50$ 11,340.00$ 106.00$ 12,720.00$ 112.50$ 13,500.00$ 33 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 450 $25.00 11,250.00$ 39.30$ 17,685.00$ 32.00$ 14,400.00$ 26.00$ 11,700.00$ 34 DITCH GRADING LF 1445 $8.00 11,560.00$ 2.85$ 4,118.25$ 9.00$ 13,005.00$ 8.20$ 11,849.00$ 35 TOPSOIL BORROW CY 175 $35.00 6,125.00$ 38.20$ 6,685.00$ 40.00$ 7,000.00$ 42.00$ 7,350.00$ 36 SEEDING - MIXTURE 24-151 SY 3400 $2.00 6,800.00$ 0.20$ 680.00$ 0.50$ 1,700.00$ 0.85$ 2,890.00$ 37 HYDRAULIC BONDED FIBER MATRIX SY 1000 $2.00 2,000.00$ 0.25$ 250.00$ 3.00$ 3,000.00$ 2.20$ 2,200.00$ 38 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EA 1 $2,500.00 2,500.00$ 1,970.00$ 1,970.00$ 1.00$ 1.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 39 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAW - MAINTAINED LF 200 $2.50 500.00$ 14.20$ 2,840.00$ 10.00$ 2,000.00$ 5.00$ 1,000.00$ 40 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3N, STRAW 2S SY 2400 $4.00 9,600.00$ 1.05$ 2,520.00$ 1.50$ 3,600.00$ 2.50$ 6,000.00$ 41 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LF 850 $3.00 2,550.00$ 2.10$ 1,785.00$ 4.00$ 3,400.00$ 2.50$ 2,125.00$ 42 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EA 1 $250.00 250.00$ 545.00$ 545.00$ 225.00$ 225.00$ 165.00$ 165.00$ 43 CULVERT PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EA 16 $225.00 3,600.00$ 204.00$ 3,264.00$ 225.00$ 3,600.00$ 245.00$ 3,920.00$ Total Bid: 464,650.00$ Total Bid: 510,438.35$ Total Bid: 512,384.00$ Total Bid: 526,539.69$ Engineer's Estimate Bid No. 1 Bid No. 2 Bid No. 3 Park Construction Company New Look Contracting Northwest Bid No. 1 Bid No. 2 Bid No. 3 Minneapolis, MN 55432 Rogers, MN 55374 Shakopee, MN 55379 1481 81st Ave NE 14045 Northdale Blvd. 1451 Stagecoach Road Park Construction Company New Look Contracting Northwest Project No. 2294-17-031 BID TABULATION CITY OF CORCORAN CORCORAN TRAIL STREET IMPROVEMENTS 227704153 08/19/2021 Bid Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price BASE BID: 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $22,030.00 22,030.00$ 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 54,000.00$ 54,000.00$ 22,675.00$ 22,675.00$ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $2,190.00 2,190.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,625.00$ 2,625.00$ 3 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LF 165 $10.00 1,650.00$ 10.00$ 1,650.00$ 10.75$ 1,773.75$ 20.00$ 3,300.00$ 4 REMOVE DRIVEWAY CULVERT LF 210 $10.00 2,100.00$ 10.00$ 2,100.00$ 8.75$ 1,837.50$ 15.00$ 3,150.00$ 5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 385 $7.00 2,695.00$ 12.00$ 4,620.00$ 10.00$ 3,850.00$ 10.00$ 3,850.00$ 6 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 90 $9.00 810.00$ 15.50$ 1,395.00$ 20.00$ 1,800.00$ 20.00$ 1,800.00$ 7 SALVAGE & RESPREAD DRIVEWAY SURFACING AGGREGATE SY 130 $14.00 1,820.00$ 13.50$ 1,755.00$ 20.00$ 2,600.00$ 23.84$ 3,099.20$ 8 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SY 11500 $2.50 28,750.00$ 3.75$ 43,125.00$ 0.75$ 8,625.00$ 2.64$ 30,360.00$ 9 CLEARING & GRUBBING LS 1 $5,000.00 5,000.00$ 7,800.00$ 7,800.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 7,350.00$ 7,350.00$ 10 ROADWAY PREPARATION RD ST 40.5 $300.00 12,150.00$ 200.00$ 8,100.00$ 500.00$ 20,250.00$ 703.70$ 28,499.85$ 11 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 600 $3.00 1,800.00$ 3.00$ 1,800.00$ 2.50$ 1,500.00$ 3.53$ 2,118.00$ 12 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) TON 1310 $75.00 98,250.00$ 68.00$ 89,080.00$ 84.00$ 110,040.00$ 81.73$ 107,066.30$ 13 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) TON 1750 $70.00 122,500.00$ 56.00$ 98,000.00$ 74.00$ 129,500.00$ 68.15$ 119,262.50$ 14 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2 TON 155 $40.00 6,200.00$ 38.00$ 5,890.00$ 50.00$ 7,750.00$ 30.10$ 4,665.50$ 15 EXCAVATE, LOAD, AND HAUL RECLAIM AGGREGATE CY 650 $15.00 9,750.00$ 22.50$ 14,625.00$ 25.00$ 16,250.00$ 15.98$ 10,387.00$ 16 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 100 $20.00 2,000.00$ 43.00$ 4,300.00$ 38.00$ 3,800.00$ 50.00$ 5,000.00$ 17 SALVAGE & PLACE RECLAIM AGGREGATE CY 50 $8.00 400.00$ 26.50$ 1,325.00$ 25.00$ 1,250.00$ 15.00$ 750.00$ 18 6" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LF 860 $15.00 12,900.00$ 52.00$ 44,720.00$ 38.00$ 32,680.00$ 49.72$ 42,759.20$ 19 8" SOLID PVC SCH 40 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 85 $30.00 2,550.00$ 52.00$ 4,420.00$ 33.85$ 2,877.25$ 69.18$ 5,880.30$ 20 8" PERFORATED PVC SCH 40 DRAIN TILE PIPE LF 365 $15.00 5,475.00$ 58.00$ 21,170.00$ 47.75$ 17,428.75$ 65.01$ 23,728.65$ 21 CLEANOUT W/ THREADED CAP EA 3 $300.00 900.00$ 1,200.00$ 3,600.00$ 918.00$ 2,754.00$ 1,041.31$ 3,123.93$ 22 27" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN EA 2 $2,000.00 4,000.00$ 1,300.00$ 2,600.00$ 1,722.00$ 3,444.00$ 3,394.11$ 6,788.22$ 23 18" RC PIPE STORM SEWER CLASS V LF 42 $60.00 2,520.00$ 93.50$ 3,927.00$ 59.00$ 2,478.00$ 116.79$ 4,905.18$ 24 21" RC PIPE STORM SEWER CLASS V LF 125 $65.00 8,125.00$ 103.00$ 12,875.00$ 65.00$ 8,125.00$ 124.80$ 15,600.00$ 25 24" RC PIPE STORM SEWER CLASS V LF 121 $75.00 9,075.00$ 133.00$ 16,093.00$ 87.50$ 10,587.50$ 148.12$ 17,922.52$ 26 18" RC FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASHGUARD EA 2 $1,500.00 3,000.00$ 2,100.00$ 4,200.00$ 1,650.00$ 3,300.00$ 1,690.00$ 3,380.00$ 27 21" RC FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASHGUARD EA 4 $1,750.00 7,000.00$ 2,600.00$ 10,400.00$ 2,135.00$ 8,540.00$ 2,109.25$ 8,437.00$ 28 24" RC FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASHGUARD EA 4 $2,000.00 8,000.00$ 3,100.00$ 12,400.00$ 2,535.00$ 10,140.00$ 2,557.02$ 10,228.08$ 29 15" CMP STORM SEWER LF 165 $35.00 5,775.00$ 66.00$ 10,890.00$ 47.50$ 7,837.50$ 89.35$ 14,742.75$ 30 15" CMP FLARED END SECTION EA 8 $250.00 2,000.00$ 900.00$ 7,200.00$ 567.00$ 4,536.00$ 568.57$ 4,548.56$ 31 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CY 60 $75.00 4,500.00$ 140.00$ 8,400.00$ 133.00$ 7,980.00$ 174.99$ 10,499.40$ 32 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 120 $100.00 12,000.00$ 105.00$ 12,600.00$ 121.00$ 14,520.00$ 151.25$ 18,150.00$ 33 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 450 $25.00 11,250.00$ 27.50$ 12,375.00$ 30.00$ 13,500.00$ 52.78$ 23,751.00$ 34 DITCH GRADING LF 1445 $8.00 11,560.00$ 2.50$ 3,612.50$ 8.00$ 11,560.00$ 13.15$ 19,001.75$ 35 TOPSOIL BORROW CY 175 $35.00 6,125.00$ 57.00$ 9,975.00$ 50.00$ 8,750.00$ 40.00$ 7,000.00$ 36 SEEDING - MIXTURE 24-151 SY 3400 $2.00 6,800.00$ 0.27$ 918.00$ 0.25$ 850.00$ 0.21$ 714.00$ 37 HYDRAULIC BONDED FIBER MATRIX SY 1000 $2.00 2,000.00$ 1.40$ 1,400.00$ 1.25$ 1,250.00$ 0.26$ 260.00$ 38 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EA 1 $2,500.00 2,500.00$ 1.00$ 1.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,996.85$ 2,996.85$ 39 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAW - MAINTAINED LF 200 $2.50 500.00$ 4.00$ 800.00$ 3.50$ 700.00$ 5.25$ 1,050.00$ 40 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3N, STRAW 2S SY 2400 $4.00 9,600.00$ 1.90$ 4,560.00$ 1.70$ 4,080.00$ 1.10$ 2,640.00$ 41 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LF 850 $3.00 2,550.00$ 2.25$ 1,912.50$ 2.00$ 1,700.00$ 2.21$ 1,878.50$ 42 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EA 1 $250.00 250.00$ 200.00$ 200.00$ 105.00$ 105.00$ 367.50$ 367.50$ 43 CULVERT PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EA 16 $225.00 3,600.00$ 135.00$ 2,160.00$ 120.00$ 1,920.00$ 367.50$ 5,880.00$ Total Bid: 464,650.00$ Total Bid: 532,474.00$ Total Bid: 557,469.25$ Total Bid: 612,191.74$ Northdale Construction Company, Inc. Engineer's Estimate Bid No. 6 Northdale Construction Company, Inc. Duininck, IncBituminous Roadways, Inc. Bid No. 6Bid No. 5Bid No. 4 9760 71st Street NE Albertville, MN 55301 408 6th Street Prinsburg, MN 56281 1520 Commerce Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Bid No. 5 Duininck, Inc. Bid No. 4 Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Project No. 2294-17-031 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10a. Council Meeting: August 26, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: City Council Appointment Action Required: Approval Summary: On July 16th, Councilmember Manoj Thomas issued his resignation which the City Council accepted on July 22nd. At that meeting, the Council declared a vacancy and directed staff to open an application period to close at 4pm on August 19, 2021. A total of six applications were received by the deadline from the following individuals: • Byron Moyle • Dean Vehrenkamp • Gerald (Jay) Van Den Einde • Justin White • Mark Lanterman • Stanislas (Stas) Manchik The applications are attached to this report. The City Council should review the applications and consider appointing an individual to the City Council beginning September 9, 2021. The term would then expire following a special election which would take place on November 8, 2022. Financial/Budget: Not applicable. Options: 1. Approve resolution 2021-98 appointing an individual to the City Council. 2. Defer the appointment to a future meeting. Council Action: 1. Consider a motion approving resolution 2021-98 appointing an individual to the City Council. Attachments: 1. City Council applications 2. Resolution 2021-98 A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Administrative Offices Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 Phone: 763-420-8966 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 CITY COUNCIL APPLICATION DUE AUGUST 19, 2021 AT 4:00 PM The City welcomes you as an applicant for appointment to the City Council. To be considered for appointment, individuals must be eligible to vote in Minnesota, at least 21 years of age on assuming the office, and maintain residency in the City of Corcoran. Please complete the following information, attach extra sheets if necessary, and return to City Hall. Accommodations will be provided, upon request, to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in the application process. DATA PRACTICES ADVISORY The City is required to provide the following information to you. Under Minnesota law, your name and home address are public information, which must be provided to anyone who requests it. If appointed to the City Council, the following information will also be public: education and training background, previous work experience, work location, a work telephone number, and any expense reimbursement. The other information requested below is classified as private. This information will be used by the City Council in determining qualification for appointment to the City Council. Therefore, all of the information will be provided to the City Council in a public forum and will be reviewed in public. Failure to provide the requested information may result in forfeiture of a City Council appointment. Please complete the information below: Name: Address: Phone: (h) (w) (c) E-mail: Please answer the following questions (use the back side if more space is needed): 1)How long have you been a Corcoran resident? Continued on the next page… Byron Moyle 9425 County Road 101 , Corcoran, MN 55340 763-568-0438 byron@midwestliftsllc.com I moved to Corcoran with my family in September of 2020. A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Administrative Offices Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 Phone: 763-420-8966 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 2)Please list any city committees/ commissions you have served on in the past, either for the City of Corcoran or another community. Please include the dates of service and if you held any positions such as Chair or Secretary. 3)Please describe why you feel qualified to serve on the City Council, including any other relevant experience with the issues faced by the City. 4)Why are you interested in serving on the City Council? If appointed, I agree to disclose any conflict of interest I might have in reviewing or approving any contract, license, permit, application, appointment, land use decision, public improvement, or other matter that comes before me. Please sign and date this application and return to: City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran MN 55340 ______________________________________ _________________ Applicant Signature Date I feel that I bring a unique perspective to the Council that is not yet represented. I am a small business owner and specifically moved to Corcoran because it was the opportunity to own land and have a building on my property where I could operate my business. I feel that small businesses are a voice that are under represented in Corcoran. I would like to see more small business growth with a more "small business friendly" community that not only welcomes, but supports small businesses. In addition, I am a landowner (7 acres) and I think this brings another unique perspective as someone who enjoys the quiet, small town life of Corcoran but realizes the need for growth and economic stimulation. 2020 has been a life changing year in many respects and the Corcoran city council is no exception. New perspectives and communication styles have led to a council that is more transparent. More residents are becoming involved and voicing their opinions on the direction they feel Corcoran is heading, both positive and negative. Since moving to Corcoran, I have become extremely involved and invested in the decisions made affecting the future and I see on social media platforms how passionate the residents feel. I actively research issues and ensure that I am up to date on any important issues that may affect my family. Although I have not served in a position previously, I have lived in many different cities. I grew up on a farm in Parkers Prairie and then spent many years of my adult life in the city of St. Paul, with stops along the way in Elk River, Alexandria and Apple Valley. I have experienced first hand policies that have both helped and hindered my success and have witnessed councils that make decisions detrimental to the residents without seemingly involving them in the process. My experience as a small business owner for the past 4 years has also given me the opportunities to work with the state and several counties in various grant programs. 08.17.2021Byron Moyle A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Administrative Offices Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 Phone: 763-420-8966 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 CITY COUNCIL APPLICATION DUE AUGUST 19, 2021 AT 4:00 PM The City welcomes you as an applicant for appointment to the City Council. To be considered for appointment, individuals must be eligible to vote in Minnesota, at least 21 years of age on assuming the office, and maintain residency in the City of Corcoran. Please complete the following information, attach extra sheets if necessary, and return to City Hall. Accommodations will be provided, upon request, to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in the application process. DATA PRACTICES ADVISORY The City is required to provide the following information to you. Under Minnesota law, your name and home address are public information, which must be provided to anyone who requests it. If appointed to the City Council, the following information will also be public: education and training background, previous work experience, work location, a work telephone number, and any expense reimbursement. The other information requested below is classified as private. This information will be used by the City Council in determining qualification for appointment to the City Council. Therefore, all of the information will be provided to the City Council in a public forum and will be reviewed in public. Failure to provide the requested information may result in forfeiture of a City Council appointment. Please complete the information below: Name: Address: Phone: (h) (w) (c) E-mail: Please answer the following questions (use the back side if more space is needed): 1)How long have you been a Corcoran resident? Continued on the next page… Mark Lanterman 6936 Oak Ridge Road Corcoran, MN 55340 (612) 802-0004(952) 924-9920 mlanterman@compforensics.com My family and I have been Corcoran residents since July 2013. A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered www.ci.corcoran.mn.us 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Phone: 763-420-2288 Administrative Offices Public Works Offices 9100 County Road 19 Corcoran, MN 55357 Phone: 763-420-2652 Phone: 763-420-8966 Police Department Offices 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 If appointed, I agree to disclose any conflict of interest I might have in reviewing or approving any contract, license, permit, application, appointment, land use decision, public improvement, or other matter that comes before me. Please sign and date this application and return to: City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran MN 55340 ______________________________________ _________________ Applicant Signature Date 2)Please list any city committees/ commissions you have served on in the past, either for the City of Corcoran or another community. Please include the dates of service and if you held any positions such as Chair or Secretary. I was appointed to a vacancy on the Corcoran Planning Commission earlier this year (2021), where I continue to serve. In addition to my role on the Planning Commission, the Minnesota Supreme Court appointed me to the Lawyer Professional Responsibility Board in 2017 and I currently serve as the Chairperson of its Opinion Committee. 3)Please describe why you feel qualified to serve on the City Council, including any other relevant experience with the issues faced by the City. I am well suited to serve the residents of Corcoran by applying my skills to (1) properly identify the issues presented by a specific application or topic and (2) analyze the issues to the best of my ability, taking into account the myriad factors. In the past five months, I have demonstrated these capabilities on the Planning Commission. I take seriously the decisions of our local government, and understand its long and short term affects on our City and its residents. Working in cybersecurity, and having formerly worked as an investigator for local and federal law enforcement, I am dedicated to approaching an issue from all angles and devoting the time and rigorous thought that is necessary to contribute a well-reasoned and principled basis for a resolution. 4)Why are you interested in serving on the City Council? I am interested in serving on the Corcoran City Council because I enjoy spending my time carefully scrutinizing the issues that come before the Council. Understanding that the decisions of the Council literally hit close to home for the City's residents, it is a great responsibility that requires significant attention. I believe that I will bring additional thoughts, evaluations, and perspective. 08/19/2021 City of Corcoran August 26, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-98 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ___________________ TO THE CORCORAN CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran received a resignation notice from Councilmember Manoj Thomas effective July 16, 2021; and WHEREAS, the City Council declared a vacancy at its July 22, 2021 meeting, and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 412.02 dictates a special election shall be held at or before the next city election to fill the unexpired term, and WHEREAS, the City Council may appoint an individual to serve on the City Council until a qualified successor is elected at the special election; and WHEREAS, the City Council accepted applications for appointment until 4:00 pm on Thursday, August 19, 2021; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found __________________to meet the requirements for appointment to serve on the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Corcoran, that the City Council hereby appoints ________________to the City Council, effective September 9, 2021, until a qualified successor is elected at a special election. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 26th day of August 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee –Mayor City Seal ATTEST: ____________________________________ Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 MEMORANDUM 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net DATE August 18, 2021 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications Projects/Comments in blue italics are new The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1.Request for Rezoning, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance for Garages Too, LLC at 224010 Highway 55 (PID 32-119-23-44-0001) (city file 21-016). The applicant has requested approval to allow a mini storage/self-storage facility on the property. The City Council reviewed a concept plan earlier this year and indicated support. The application was reviewed at a Public Hearing at the August 5th Planning Commission and is scheduled for Council action on August 26th. 2.Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building Sidewall Height at 6805 Rolling Hills Road (PID 32-119-23-11-0002) (city file 21-018). The applicant is requesting approval to exceed the sidewall height on a new accessory building in the rear yard. This item was reviewed at a public hearing at the June 3rd Planning Commission meeting where questions were raised about the section of the Zoning Ordinance regarding accessory buildings. This item has been placed on hold while the City considers a Zoning Ordinance text amendment and Council action is tentatively scheduled for August 26th. 3.Vacation of Cain Road ROW (city file 21-022). The City Council voted to commence the vacation process as requested by Michael Galbraith to remove an easement containing an unimproved portion of Cain Road adjacent to his property at 20700 70th Avenue. A public hearing is tentatively scheduled for the August 12th meeting. 4.Sign Ordinance Amendment (city file 21-027). The City Council directed staff to prepare an update to the sign ordinance regarding campaign signs. The ordinance is scheduled for consideration at the August 26th City Council meeting. 5.Zoning Ordinance Amendment (city file no. 21-029). Staff is requesting that the City Council consider a text amendment to Section 1030.020 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding accessory structures. The ordinance was amended in 2011 to allow landowners to apply for a conditional use permit to exceed the sidewall height for all properties regardless of parcel size. As part of the review of a recent application by Dave Dornsbach, the City Attorney was asked to review the ordinance and recommends changes before acting on the landowner request. At the June 24th meeting Council directed staff to schedule this item for a public hearing at the August 5th Planning Commission and for action at the August 26th City Council meeting. 6.Preliminary Plat for “Bechtold Farm” at 10165 Bechtold Road (PID 05-119-23-44-0001 and 0811923110007) (city file no. 21-030). Skies Limit LLC has requested approval of a preliminary plat to create 12 lots on 115.61 acres. The item is currently incomplete and will be scheduled for meetings upon receipt of a complete application. Agenda Item 11a. MEMORANDUM 2 7. Amendments to the text of Chapter 82 (Nuisances) of the City Code (city file no. 21-032). At the June 10th meeting, Council directed staff to prepare amendments to ease storage restrictions from RVs, firewood and lots with more than one street frontage. The Council reviewed a draft ordinance amendment prepared by staff and the City Attorney. City Council directed staff to proceed with the draft ordinance with to allow a 25-foot front yard setback for up to two recreational vehicles in addition to modifying the language to also allow personal recreational vehicles and unoccupied trailers in the front yard. Staff was directed to proceed with a Public Hearing which is scheduled for the August 26th meeting. 8. Kariniemi Sketch Plan for 23185 County Road 10 (PID 18-119-23-11-0002) (city file no. 21-033). The applicant has requested Council feedback on a concept to reguide/rezone part of the property from residential to commercial to create 3 commercial lots and 10 residential lots. This item is scheduled for Council review at the August 26th meeting. 9. Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Assembly Uses (city file 21-034). At the June 24th meeting, the City Council discussed removing assembly uses in low residential zoning districts within the MUSA. Staff was directed to proceed with a Public Hearing. The item was tabled at the August 5th Planning Commission meeting to September 2nd and two alternatives will be presented for consideration. The item will be forwarded to the September 23rd City Council meeting. 10. Final Plat and PUD Final Plan for “Tavera 2nd Addition” (PID 35-119-23-41-0001 and 35-119-23- 41-0002) (city file no. 21-036). The final plat for phase 2 includes 46 single family homes. The application is scheduled for Planning Commission review on September 2nd and City Council action on September 23rd. 11. Final Plat and PUD Final Plan for “Amberley 1st Addition” and “Bellwether 6th Addition” (PID 01-119-23-34-0002) (city file no. 21-037). The application is for 62 lots in Bellwether 6th and 25 lots in Amberley 1st Addition. The application is currently incomplete, but is tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission and City Council action in October. 12. Final Plat for “Gordon’s Country Estates First Addition” at 19701 Jackie Lane and 19717 Jackie Lane (PID 01-119-23-22-0024 and 01-119-23-22-0021) (city file no. 21-038). The final plat adjusts the lot line between two existing parcels and is scheduled for City Council approval on August 26th. The following projects were recently acted upon and will be closed out: 1. Request for Rezoning, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Preliminary Plat for “Amberley” and “Bellwether” from Pulte Homes (PID 01-119-23-34-002 and 01-119-23-43-0002) (City file 21- 017). Pulte has submitted a request for approval to allow 192 new homes. The Council reviewed a concept plan earlier this year and indicated support. Staff is working with the applicant to resolve infrastructure questions. This item was reviewed at the Parks and Trails Commission meeting on May 20th, at a public hearing at the July 1st Planning Commission and approved by the City Council on July 22nd. 2. City Initiated Ordinance and Land Use Map Amendments (city file 21-020). Staff is recommending four changes to the land use map for consistency with the adopted plan and minor edits to Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance. This item was reviewed at a public hearing at the July 1st Planning Commission and City Council approved the request on July 22nd. The land use map edits have been sent to the Metropolitan Council for review. 3. Franzen Estates Final Plat at 23020 Strehler Road (PID 17-119-23-32-0003) (city file 21-021). Greg and Deb Franzen have submitted a final plat application for the three lot subdivision. The preliminary plat was approved earlier this year. The application was approved at the July 22nd Council meeting and the applicant is working to address the approval conditions. 4. PUD Amendment for Tavera (city file 21-023). U.S. Home Corporation dba Lennar has requested approval of a PUD amendment to modify the PUD approvals to allow larger temporary real estate signs than allowed by City Code, add two additional lots to the approved preliminary plat and to modify the PUD approvals to allow garage forward home design even for the homes that exceed the MEMORANDUM 3 percentage of garage on the front elevations. The application was acted on at the July 22nd City Council meeting. 5. Preliminary Plat and Variance for Gordon’s County Estates at 19701 and 19717 Jackie Lane (PID 01-119-23-22-0021 and 01-119-23-22-0024) (City file 21-025). The applicant has submitted a request to adjust the common lot line between two parcels in the Urban Reserve zoning district. The was reviewed at a public hearing at the July 1st Planning Commission and was approved by the City Council on July 22nd. 6. Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan for Cook Lake Highlands (PID 25-119-23- 14-0003) (city file no. 21-028). Trek Development has requested approval for a mixed use development with a senior co-op, villa homes, day care and assisted living/memory care. This is a new application similar to the one denied in April. The applicant has since met with neighbors and received Council approval to submit a new application. This new application was reviewed at a Public Hearing at the Planning Commission on July 1st, at the July 15th Parks and Trails Commission and was approved at the July 22nd City Council meeting. 7. Administrative Permit for T-Mobile Tower Changes for 20140 County Road 30 (PID 11-119-23- 12-0001) (city file no. 21-035). The applicant has requested approval to swap out antennas and ground equipment on this existing tower. This application was administratively approved. City of Corcoran 2021 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 12. September 9, 2021 Work Session – 5:30 pm • 2022 Budget and Financial Management Plan September 9, 2021 • City Council Oath of Office • Officer Oath of Office • Sergeant Promotion • Commissioner Appointment process • Job Description Update – Police Administrative Assistant • Stormwater Area Charge • Call Assessment Hearings – Corcoran Trail/Appaloosa Woods Improvement projects • Grant Application Approval – City Park Master Plan • Northeast Corcoran Water Project • Potential “Town Hall” meeting • Paving Petition – Park Trail Road September 23, 2021 Work Session – 5:30 pm • Fire Service Work Plan September 23, 2021 • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • Conditional Uses in Residential Zoning Districts • Assessment Hearings – Appaloosa Woods/Corcoran Trail East & West • Zoning Amendment for Assembly Uses • Amberly/Bellwether Final Plat and Final PUD Plan • Tavera 2nd Addition Final Plat and Final PUD Plan • Phone System Proposal