HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-01-09 Council MinutesCORCORAN CITY COUNCIL
JANUARY 9, 1997
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor Larkin called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. Present were Mayor Larkin, Council
Members Ken Kluck, Ernie Mayers, Ken Guenthner, and Dixie Lindsley. Also present were City
Administrator Bob Derus, City Planner Gary Eitel, Police Chief Paul Schutte, Public Works
Supervisor Dan Brotzler, City Attorney Jeff Carson, and Planning Commissioner Toni
Hohenstein, Planning Commissioner/Septic Committee Member John Bucher, and Building
Inspector/Planning Commissioner/Septic Committee Member Loren Kohnen.
There were approximately 45 people in attendance at the meeting.
OATH OF OFFICE FOR KEN GUENTHNER. DIXIE LINDSLEY AND MAYOR LARKIN
Administrator Derus administered the oath of office to Ken Guenthner, Dixie Lindsley, and
Mayor Larkin.
RECESS
Mayor Larkin declared a brief recess for friends and family to congratulate the newly elected
Mayor and Council. The meeting resumed at approximately 7:15 P.M.
SET AGENDA
The agenda was set as presented.
MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 26, 1996
Mayor Larkin explained that Arnie Palmer had contacted him to question the Council minutes of
November 26, 1996. Palmer objected to the City Council motion regarding his driveway permit.
The Council discussed the issue with the City Attorney. Tom Emmer, Mr. Palmer's Attorney
also explained Palmer's concerns.
Moved by Larkin, seconded by Mayers, to cancel that part of the Minutes of November 26, 1996
having to do with the Palmer driveway/access request.
Motion carried, with Larkin, Mayers, and Kluck voting aye, and Guenthner and Lindsley
abstaining.
PLANNING COMMISSION CONSENT ITEMS
Gary Eitel, presented the Planning Commission report.
Reauest by Hennepin Countv and Minnesota Department of Transportation for a
Conditional Use Permit With Setback Variance to Facilitate the Construction of a New
240 Foot Multi -Purpose Communication Tower and SuI212ort Equipment Shelter at
Hennepin County Maintenance Building, Located at 23400 County Road 10 PID
#07-11 -23 43 0001 and PID #07-119-23 43 0002
The City Council discussed:
• The number of potential users on the tower.
• Possible methods of dispute resolution
• Will the County need more towers? - Mr. Roger Lawrence, Hennepin County Sheriffs
Radio, was at the meeting. He explained that this was the only tower needed within a
seven mile radius.
• Mr. Lawrence also testified that he thought that the recommended site of the tower was
workable with the County.
60
Moved by Muck, seconded by Lindsley, to approve the tower conditional use permit, per the
Planning Commission's recommendation, and to direct the preparation of a Resolution.
Motion carried unanimously.
I� �l:�i►ii►C*1�L�7►i i � i hX� [�7►� �] E.Yy�l.X9 [�li.� iw Y � a f'
Brothers Mini -Storage Regarding Lane, se and Zoning Issues on a ProI20sed Site on
Larkin Road
The City Council briefly discussed. No action was taken, because the matter will be considered
at a later date, if the applicant applies for a Conditional Use Permit.
Use of the Rear Portion of the Commercial Building Located at 7241 County Road 11
(Former Pattern Craft Building)
Gary Eitel explained the background on the use of the back portion of the building at 7241
County Road 116. The City Council briefly discussed. No action was taken.
Resignation of Don Scherber from the Planning, -Commission (1978 - 19961
Moved by Kluck, second by Mayers, to accept the Planning Commission recommendation
approving the resignation of Planning Commissioner Don Scherber, with regrets, and to
recognize his service with a plaque or something similar.
Motion carried unanimously.
Moved by Mayers, seconded by Lindsley, to promote Loren Kohnen from Planning Commission
Alternate, to Planning Commissioner, and to authorize staff to advertise for one more alternate
member.
Motion carried unanimously. The Council suggested the advertisement go out in the newsletter.
Reviewing Setback Requirements from Parks Playgrounds. Ball -fields, and Commercial
Recreational Uses (i.e. Golf Courses. etc.)
Gary Eitel explained the background on his recommendation that the City consider increased
setbacks for parks, playgrounds, ball -fields, and commercial recreational uses (i.e. golf courses,
etc.) The City Council briefly discussed. No action was taken.
PLANNING RELATED ITEMS POSTPONED FOR THE NEW CITY COUNCIL
Doug Arntson. 1 203 81 st Place Request for Approval of Two Radio Towers and
Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements
Jeff Carson gave a report on his review of the Arntson request to retain the use of his two towers,
and gave his recommendation.
The City Council discussed:
• The vagueness of the Code
• Questioned whether an applicant would be out of compliance with a T.V. antenna on the
roof (and other similar antennas on the roof) and a tower
• What's the function of the mono pole on Antson's site.
• Arntson volunteered to remove the pole if the golf course objected to it.
Moved by Guenthner, seconded by Lindsley, 1. To deny Arntson's request for two
towers/antenna structures on his property. 2. That we acknowledge with appreciation his
willingness to work with the golf course in creating a better situation there. 3. That we direct
staff and Council to review the ordinance and invite Mr. Arntson's participation in that review of
the ordinance.
Motion carried unanimously.
Craig_Scherber - Request for Direction on Alternative Development Proposals for 61
Propertyt ihe Northeast Intersection of County Road 116 and Schulte Road
Gary briefly explained the background on the two directions Scherber was pursuing on his
application. The City Council discussed:
• Mayor Larkin and Ernie Mayers stated they did not favor rerouting Schutte Road
• The conflict with the transportation plan, if Schutte Road is not rerouted.
• Muck stated that this is the time to consider rerouting Schutte Road, because the land is still
open.
• Construction cost estimates.
• Cost of Schutte Road maintenance.
• What's the plan of the landowner to the east (Gunnison).
• Mayers suggested soil borings prior to making a decision.
• Has the alternate alignment been studied to determine if soils are better?
• Right-of-way costs.
• Financing.
•Issues related to MSA designation.
• Concerns of the amount of time the applicant has been waiting for a decision from the City.
• Technical costs needed to make a decision.
Moved by Guenthner, seconded by Larkin, that the Council appoint one of its members to sit
clown with the developer and city staff and work through the multiple issues that we have
discussed in the last 15 minutes and come back to the next meeting with a specific
recommendation that the person knows the Council will accept.
Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Larkin appointed Ken Guenthner to meet with the applicant and staff.
RF En 2ineers - Alternative Designs for the County Road t0 and County Road 116
Intersection and for the County Road 10 Corridor
Bob Derus briefly explained that the staff was looking for Council direction on a process to
consider the alternatives. The City Council discussed:
• Ways to obtain public input
• Cost and financing of the alternatives
• Conducting a public educational meeting
Moved by Guenthner, seconded by Muck, to instruct staff to come to the February meeting with
a format for a public informational meeting in March, other than a City Council meeting night.
Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration_ of Adding Staff for Planning
The City Council discussed:
• Student internship, and whether this was the appropriate direction.
+ Dixie Lindsley explained that the City Council first needs to determine how much of a
Planner's time is needed
• Possibility of retaining Loren Kohnen as a contract Planner
• Paul Jacobs volunteered that, through his affiliation with the University of Minnesota
School of Landscape Architecture, there could possibly be some solutions for the City.
Moved by Guenthner, seconded by Larkin, to create a committee, including a representative of
the Planning Commission, Gary Eitel, and any other individuals may appoint or invite that
appropriate representatives on the committee make a recommendation with regard to a job
description.
There was a brief discussion. A friendly amendment to the motion was made by Guenthner to
designate Gary Eitel and Dixie Lindsley to serve on this committee; We ask the Planning
62
Commission to appoint one of its members to represent on the committee; And then we identify,
in a generic sense, the types of other individuals we will want on it - Someone from the business
community - Someone from the farming community - And someone, for lack of a better term,
from the residential community. So that would be three other individuals, and that, between now
and the next meeting we advertise, however we do that, for interested representatives from those
different categories.
Motion carried unanimously.
The Council suggested that these opening be published in the newsletter.
PAUL JACOBS - DISCUSSION OF AVAILABLE SERVICES OF THE CRTCD
Paul Jacobs was at the meeting to offer the City possible services from the Rural Center for
Technology and Cooperative Development (CRTCD). He explained that the University staff
may be able to come to the City to offer possible assistance. Also discussed was scheduling a
workshop to discuss some of the possible services.
Moved by Mayers, seconded by Lindsley, to extend an invitation to the University of Minnesota
to come out to the City to discuss possible services. Motion carried unanimously.
HOME RULE CHARTER COMMISSION OPENING
Mayor Larkin explained that there was an opening on the Home Rule Charter Commission.
Larkin suggested that Bill Glowacki would be a good appointment to the Commission, noting
that he had applied for the opening. Mayers made a motion to recommend Bill Glowacki to the
Judge for appointment to the Home Rule Charter Commission by the Chief Judge. The Council
then discussed:
• The staff should put an article in the newsletter about the opening.
• Applicants can contact the judge directly.
• The Council can make a recommendation to the judge for the Home Rule Charter
Commission.
Mayers withdrew his motion, so the position could be advertised in the newsletter.
RICHARD SCHMIDT - QUESTIONS REGARDING SNOWPLOWING
Richard Schmidt was at the meeting to inquire about the weekend snowplowing policy. He was
concerned that the plowing on the weekend was not adequate. He specifically related to the
problems with snow the previous Sunday morning (January 4) Dan Brotzler addressed the
concerns. The following items were discussed:
• This year most of the storms have been on the weekend.
• The policy is the same on the weekends as during the week.
• The difficulty in deciding when to plow - timing of the end of the storm, conflicts of traffic,
needs of residents, etc.
• The snowplowing policy.
• Priority routes and order in which the streets are plowed.
No action was taken.
The Council suggested that the staff inform people about snowplowing procedure in the
newsletter as soon as possible.
BUDGET
Distribute Copy of t997 Approved Budget
Derus briefly explained the 1997 budget. Moved by Muck, seconded by Lindsley, to approve
amend the 1997 budget by transferring $16,442 out of the 1.996 year-end balance into the 1997
budget to balance it.
Motion carried unanimously.
Year End Budget Re ort - Di r' ute Draft Report
This item was not discussed.
1997 Budget Issues
This item was not discussed.
ITY COUNCIL ORIENTATION - DISTRIBUTE MISCELLANEOUS CITY POLICIES AND
OTHER INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION
The Council briefly reviewed their Council reference manuals. No action was taken.
PIQNEER SARAH CREEK - APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE UNTIL A
SUCCESSOR IS NAMED
Moved by Larkin, seconded by Guenthner, to appoint Derus as Pioneer -Sarah Creek delegate
until a successor is named.
Motion carried unanimously.
LORETTO JOINT WATER ,SYSTEM
Gary Eitel distributed a feasibility study of a possible joint water system for Loretto and
Corcoran. Ken Kluck volunteered to meet with the staff and City of Loretto officials.
CONSENT AGENDA
Moved by Larkin, seconded by Muck, to Approve Resolution No. 1997 - 02, A RESOLUTION
THANKING METRO WEST INSPECTIONS FOR A $100 DONATION TO THE
CORCORAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Motion carried unanimously,
The Council briefly discussed the topo mapping claim.
Moved by Guenthner, seconded by Lindsley, to approve the consent items as follows:
• Approval of List of Claims #1 - #41 & 1996 Year End Claims
• Approval of the November 26, 1996 (as ammended earlier in the meeting)and December
18, 1996 City Council Minutes
• Approval of Crop Rental Bid
• Approval of 1997 Contract with EZ Recycling
• Approval of $500 Expenditure for Firearms Safety (to be reimbursed by the Corcoran JC's)
• Approval of Proposal form Mark Hurd for Topo Mapping 12 Half Sections at a Cost of
$2,200 Each to be Reimbursed with CD.BG Funds
• Approval of the Use of the Civic Center for a League of Cities Regional Meeting - Fall
1997
Motion carried unanimously.
1997 APPOINTMENTS
Derus noted that the Lakeshore Weekly, a publication in the Wayzata area had also submitted a
bid on the City's official newspaper. The Council went through the list of appointments.
Moved by Guenthner, seconded by Lindsley, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 1997 - 01,
A RESOLUTION SETTING ANNUAL APPOINTMENTS FOR 1997.
Motion carried unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
Review Newsletter/Discuss January 23. 1997 Public Heariniz to Discuss Sewer
Alternatives
As an introduction to the discussion about the upcoming public hearing to consider options for
downtown sewer, John Bucher, Planning Commissioner/Septic Committee Member was at the
63
64
meeting to give a report on the Septic Committee meeting held the previous night, The first
recommendation of the committee was to spend the $132,000 to over -size the sewer line in
Maple Grove, to provide adequate future capacity for downtown Corcoran. Bucher also reported
on a specific recommendation to establish a sewer task force. The Council then discussed:
• Ken Guenthner asked what was the "drop dead date" for Corcoran to make a decision on
the Maple Grove line, adding that this may give the City a little more time to make a
decision.
• Additionally Guenthner requested information on what the $132,000 purchases - Is it a
property right, that can be later sold if the City does not exercise its option to use the line?
Or, does this fund only the engineering and construction costs for a larger pipe?
• Vince Vandertop, from Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik was at the meeting. He
participated on the discussion of sewer and what was happening in Maple Grove. He
explained that he could obtain some of this information.
+ The City needs to have formal communication with Maple Grove to confirm these
concerns.
Moved by Guenthner, seconded by Kluck, to accept the Septic Issues Committee's
recommendation of the establishment of a sewer task force constituted as they recommended in
the Septic Committee's Minutes of January 8, 1997.
Motion carried unanimously.
Moved by Guenthner, seconded by Lindsley, with respect to the Septic Issues Committee's
recommendation regarding the $132,000 payment on partnering with Maple Grove, to direct the
staff to draft a letter to the City of Maple Grove (under the Mayor's signature) requesting a
commitment as to a firm and final date by which the City of Corcoran has to commit to
participating in that over -sizing.
Motion carried unanimously.
The Council then discussed the communication of the City of Corcoran's intentions with the PCA
and Metropolitan Council. Ken Guenthner volunteered to work with City staff to contact PCA
and the Metropolitan Council.
The Council then briefly discussed the fact that the title "Septic Committee" does not quite fit
this committee that is now looking into other wastewater issues and technologies.
Moved by Guenthner, seconded by Kluck, to change the name of the Septic Issue Committee, to
the Wastewater Commission.
Motion carried unanimously.
Ken Guenthner introduced his ideas for a format for the downtown sewer public hearing on
January 23, suggesting that there be set procedures, a neutral moderator, so the event goes well.
Moved by Guenthner, seconded by Mayers, that the public hearing on January 23, 1997 1. Be
convened at the civic center. 2. That we conduct as little regular business as possible on that
night, so virtually all of our time is reserved for that meeting. and 3. That it be a moderated
meeting. That is, that we have a moderator, whether it is someone from within the community or
outside of the community who is generally perceived not to have a strong position that they're
advocating, and has skills in moderating. 4. That we establish a format in advance and publicize
that format and a possible format that we invite each one of the groups that has a proposal before
the City, to be allotted a segment of time to present their information, background, whatever they
want to do in their segment of time, and that they be uninterrupted during that time, and that after
each group has gone through with their proposal, that we open it up to be a question and answer
type of session, and finally - 5. That this not be identified as a debate per se, but rather as an
educational type of session, and that it be understood from the start that the result of the meeting
is not to engage in specific decision making that night.
The Council discussed who would be a good moderator. Dayton Mayor Phil Forseth, who
moderated for one of the candidate forums, was suggested.
Motion carried unanimously.
Staff was directed to draft a letter from Mayor Larkin to Mayor Forseth, requesting that he
moderate the public meeting. If Forseth can't make it, perhaps a judge can be invited.
ADJOURN
There being no further business, Mayor Larkin adjourned the meeting at 11:0I P.M.
ATTEST:
City Administrator Mayor
65