Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-05-27 Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda May 27, 2021 - 7:00pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Commission Representatives* 5.Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6.Presentations/Recognitions 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of April 22, 2021 Work Session Council Meeting* b.Draft Minutes of April 22, 2021 Council Meeting* c.Draft Minutes of May 13, 2021 Work Session Council Meeting* d.Draft Minutes of May 13, 2021 Council Meeting* e.Financial Claims* f.City Hall Remodel – Change Order #6; Furniture Purchase* g.Hennepin County Corridor Planning Application* h.Agricultural Preserve Application* i.D&D Service Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance at 23405 County Road 10* j.Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for Scherber Demolition and Excavating at 23240 County Road 30* k.Liquor License Renewal* l.Easement Agreement* m.Employee Resignation; Recruitment Process* 8.Planning Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.NAPA Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance at 19905 75th Avenue North* b.Grading Expansion Request – Rush Creek Reserve* c.Request to Reconsider Application – Cook Lake Highlands* d.Conditional Uses in Zoning Districts* 9.Unfinished Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Hackamore Road Improvement Plan Update* 10.New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Public Works Building Improvement – 9525 Cain Road* b.Construction Hours Discussion* c.Sergeant and K9 Handler Appointment Process* d.City Meeting Format* e.City Council Terms, Roles, etc. 11.Staff Reports a.Active Corcoran Planning Applications* b.Pandemic Response Update 12.2021 City Council Schedule* 13.Adjournment *Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.corcoranmn.gov. Due to the COVID-19 health pandemic, the City Council’s regular meeting place is not available and is not open to the public. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D.021 the one or more members of the City Council may participate by telephone or other electronic means. Meeting Held Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions Call: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 840 2542 6216 Press *9 to speak during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84025426216 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 840 2542 6216 Participants can utilize the Raise Hand function to be recognized to speak during the Public Comment sections in the meeting. Participant video feeds will be muted. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov www.corcoranmn.gov STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 4. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commission Representatives Action Required: None – Informational Summary: The advisory commission representatives for the May 27th Council meeting are as follows: • Planning Commission: Meredith Wu • Parks and Trails Commission: Alicia Hoffmann Financial/Budget: N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: N/A DRAFTCITY OF CORCORAN City Council Work Session Minutes April 22, 2021 – 5:30 pm The Corcoran City Council met on April 22, 2021, in Corcoran, Minnesota. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 13D.021 and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council meeting was held remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee was present at City Hall. Councilor Bottema, Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Thomas were present via telephonic or other electronic means. City Administrator Martens and Administrative Services Director Beise were present at City Hall. Public Works Director Mattson and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk were present via telephonic or other electronic means. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor McKee called the work session to order at 5:30 pm. 2.Residential Zoning District Ordinance Updates Discussion City Planner Lindahl noted previous urban cluster ordinance discussions, MUSA density goals, open space density bonuses, and performance standards.City Planner Lindahl identified a conservation overlay space preservation option and the positive and negative aspects of standards. Council and staff discussed density of housing, open space preservation options,and developer incentives. Council discussed threshold of preservation, zoning and overlay challenges, and MUSA density requirements. Council discussed identifying conservation areas at an earlier stage in the development process,to discuss preservation areas, density, and type of housing necessary to meet density requirements.Council discussed stacking a smaller grouping of homes with preservation space. Council discussed HOA supported preservation areas, with cluster developments, and impacts to tax rates.Council reviewed park dedication and securing land. Council discussed the minimum percentage of conservation areas with developments noting Ravinia has approximately 12 percent conservation area.Council discussed open space areas and who benefits from area, if it is located within housing areas, along major roadsides, and how the preservation area is utilized. Council and staff discussed wetland impacts and not including wetland as open space.Council provided direction to staff on a proposed ordinance that would be reviewed at an upcoming meeting. 3.Adjournment MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 6:41 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk Agenda Item 7a. CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes April 22, 2021 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on April 22, 2021, in Corcoran, Minnesota. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 13D.021 and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council meeting was held remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee was present at City Hall. Councilor Bottema, Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Thomas were present via telephonic or other electronic means. City Administrator Martens and Administrative Services Director Beise were present at City Hall. Public Works Director Mattson, Director of Public Safety Gottschalk, and City Planner Lindahl were present via telephonic or other electronic means. 1.Call to Order/Roll Call Mayor McKee called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor McKee invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Martens noted item 10f. Accepting 2020 Donations was added to the agenda. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Bottema to approve the agenda as modified. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) 4.Commission Representatives Mayor McKee noted Planning Commissioner Shoulak and Parks and Trails Commissioner Strehler were present via telephonic or other electronic means. Mayor McKee invited Commissioner Shoulak and Commissioner Strehler to speak on relevant agenda items. 5.Open Forum (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate telephonically during the Open Forum discussion for items not included on the agenda. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting. No residents participated in the Open Forum. 6.Presentations/Recognitions No presentations or recognitions were heard. 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of April 8, 2021 Council Meeting b.Draft Minutes of April 8, 2021 Council Work Session c.Financial Claims d.Recruitment Process – Maintenance Worker e.Municipal State Aid Resolution f.Noise Ordinance Exemption g.Special Use Permit for Bird Banding h.Charter Commission Resignation and Application MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Schultz to approve the consent agenda as presented. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) Agenda Item 7b. 2 8. Planning Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate telephonically during the public comment opportunity for Planning Business items included on the agenda. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. a. Rear Setback Variance at 6433 Bluestem Circle City Planner Lindahl outlined the applicant request. City Planner Lindahl noted the proposed setback distance varies from 15 feet at the porch to 22.4 feet for the deck, exceeding the required building setback of 25-feet. City Planner Lindahl noted the burden of proof is on the applicant to show compliance with five variance standards for Council to approve the request. City Planner Lindahl reviewed Planning Commission findings, noting code does allow for decks to encroach 6-feet into a wetland buffer, and though the property does not encroach the wetland buffer in the north corner of the lot, to provide some relief to the applicant’s request, the Planning Commission support s a variance to allow a deck to encroach 6-feet into the setback, allowing for a 19-foot setback instead of the required 25-feet. Council inquired about similar decks within the Ravinia development and if other setback issues exist. Council referenced a similar situation on property 6430 Bluestem Circle and noted the setback issue is not unique to only the applicant. Council discussed the 25-foot City setback, buffer and wetland setbacks, and other properties affected in the Ravinia neighborhood. Council discussed the setback issue notification occurring at the time of the sale of property in builder and homeowner communications and noting discussions did not clearly indicate the type of deck/patio available upon sale of property. Council discussed ordinance criteria including practical difficulties, reasonableness of request, and reviewed the 5 variance requirements. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Nichols to approve and direct staff to draft amended variance Resolution 2021-31 for the Property at 6433 Bluestem Circle. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, and Thomas Nay: Bottema and Schultz (Motion carried 3:2) b. Preliminary Plat and Variance Application for Franzen Estates at 23020 Strehler Road City Planner Lindahl reviewed the applicant request for two variances on lot width and street frontage requirements for a three-lot subdivision. City Planner Lindahl noted past Council action from 1993, included approval of a 10-acre subdivision lot from the original 40 acres located at 23105 Larsen Road and included a 60-foot road easement the length of the 10-acre parcel. City Planner Lindahl noted the City acquired right-of-way at the end of Larson Road and the Planning Commission’s recommendation for a private drive serving the new homes. City Planner Lindahl noted the City Engineer’s recommendation aligns with code requirement for each lot to abut and have direct access to an improved street or private drive, providing access to homes and emergency veh icles, with combined driveway to limit cul de sac access. City Administrator Martens noted applicant is available for questions and added neighbors to the south agree with the recommendation in keeping the original driveway separate from the driveway dedicated to the two new homes. Council noted the lot width Council approval in 1993 is consistent with the current requested lot width. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Thomas to approve Resolution 2021-30 Preliminary Plat for “Franzen Estates” Located at 23020 Strehler Road with amendment. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) c. Rezoning, Preliminary PUD Development Plan for Cook Lake Highlands at 19220 County Road 10 City Planner Lindahl reviewed development plan history of Cook Lake Highlands project and the most recent, revised application. City Planner Lindahl noted the revised plan included a preservation of an existing trail and removal of an apartment unit from the plan and included pond and tree preservation. City Planner Lindahl noted Planning Commission and Parks and Trails Commission recommendations. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the applicant is requesting flexibility for shoreland 3 standards, parking stall length, and a 6-foot fence in front yard setback. In exchange for flexibility, the applicant will provide additional landscaping, additional right-of-way for County Road 10 future improvements, a lot for a City booster station, easements for City and Metropolitan Council utilities and access, and provide a mix of uses. City Planner Lindahl outlined re-guiding from mixed residential to medium density residential and the mix of uses. City Planner Lindahl noted the challenges of meeting the density goals within the shoreland overlay district. City Planner Lindahl noted the applicants tree preservation increase from 11 to 30 percent of wooded acres. City Planner Lindahl reviewed building design and information available currently is not sufficient to ensure compliance, and the 4 -story building height of 55-feet exceeds maximum height allowed within the shoreland and RMF-2 district of 25-feet and 35-feet. City Planner Lindahl noted the applicant is willing to alter the cooperative plans to a flat roof from a pitched roof to better accommodate the maximum height requirements, presented concepts for the villa homes, reviewed components and materials of the da ycare facility, and the concept plan for a memory care facility, public and private trail locations with a requirement for a trail connection. City Planner Lindahl reviewed recent applicant request for consideration of parks dedication fees include dedicating Outlot C to the City in lieu of fees for the single-family lots, and pay park fees of $329,378 for the cooperative, daycare, and memory care facilities. Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate telephonically during the public comment opportunity for Planning Business item 8c. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation. Steve Mueller, 7474 Fir Lane, opined on height of buildings within the development and requested no rezoning. Mr. Mueller noted his objections to the PUD on the memory care facility proposed on the property. Mr. Mueller referenced the similarity of Applewood to the recently built Maplewood 4 -story senior building in Maple Grove. Mr. Mueller opined the Applewood cooperative is too large for the proposed site. Mr. Mueller referenced the commercial businesses, parking spaces , and conducting business in a residential area. Mr. Mueller opined on the loss of trees along the property line between Bass Lake Crossing and the proposed property. Lynn Alberts, 7490 Fir Lane, opined on the difficult and unique property development , noted the natural resource inventory map includes high-quality maple and basswood within a natural community and is a rare species. Mr. Alberts reviewed code sections and his concerns relating to PUD preservation, shoreland district conservation, wildlife habitat regarding plant and animal species, and development impacts on environmentally sensitive areas. Tom Anderson, 22385 Rush Creek Drive, opined on the maple and basswood forest on the northwest corner of the parcel noting it is approximately three acres and is a unique site, is not currently on the parks map plan, but would be a beneficial site for the City to own. Mr. Anderson also opined the high- valued maple and basswood forest area is not large enough to have a trail running through it. Beth Hustad, Trek Development, thanked Council for their time and resident communication regarding the project. Ms. Hustad noted the trail running along the north property could extend past M/I Homes Bass Lake Crossing trail to preserve the high-valued maple and basswood forest area. Ms. Hustad commented on Bass Lake Road in relation to the project height and elevation of Bass Lake Road is at the same elevation level as the first floor of Applewood and is purposely positioned away from Bass Lake Road. Council and staff discussed memory care in RF-2 and the commonality to see those uses in mixed use or commercial districts. Council and staff discussed the booster station proposed location on the property for the purpose of receiving water from Maple Grove and the lift station relevancy. Public Works Director Mattson noted SE Corcoran water supply is serviced through Maple Grove. Public Works Director Mattson reviewed the separate water supply being established, but not yet constructed in Corcoran will cover NE Corcoran, and noted the lift station is relevant and necessary, as it will serve SE Corcoran for the next 25-30 years. Council reviewed the height of the Applewood building. Alex Hall, United Properties, added additional information regarding the height of the Applewood building and noted typical height is 62 feet with a pitched roof, and is preferred. Mr. Hall noted the Maple Grove apartment facility example, is a poor comparison to Applewood, as Maple Grove requested the building be brought closer to Bass Lake Road. Mr. Hall clarified the roof pitch of 4 Applewood and noted with the flat roof, it is approximately a 14-foot drop from the original building concept. Council and Ms. Hustad reviewed guide plan density and noted with removal of the 84-apartment unit building, the project does not meet the density required. With the memory care of 32 units, the project is closer to meeting density requirements. Ms. Hustad referenced other benefits of providing a daycare within the City. Council and staff discussed zoning, density, and updates within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Council asked for shoreline and impervious surface requirements pertaining to property. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the impervious surface coverage ordinance of 25 percent maximum impervious surface coverage by lot per code. Regarding the impervious surface ordinance, City Planner Lindahl noted the applicant is requesting the project be looked at a s a whole, due to the difficulties and challenges without high-density housing and leaving most of the site vacant to comply with the 25 percent limit. Council asked applicant for vision of a berm on the western side of parcel to shelter the existing neighborhood. Ms. Hustad referenced the stake on the property was moved, and on the west side of the property a trail exists and was installed by M/I Homes with an easement on property to accommodate a wetland on the M/I Homes property. Ms. Hustad indicated a 5 -foot grading plan elevation change along the trail and is willing to add feet to elevation changes to accommodate resident concerns. Ms. Hustad would commit to planning some trees along the border of Fir Lane properties for privacy. Ms. Hustad also noted Buckthorn is an issue, and lot landscaping would also be provided. Residents also committed to planting trees within backyard borders. Ms. Hustad noted 830 feet separate M/I Homes properties from the Applewood complex, and reviewed property elevation site lines in relation to Applewood. Ms. Hustad outlined the development design considered neighbors comments and concerns. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Thomas to deny Resolution 2021-35 Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and PUD for Cook Lake Highlands” located at 19220 County Road 10. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) d. PUD Sketch Plan for Refuge at Rush Creek City Planner Lindahl reviewed site history and the PUD sketch plan. City Planner Lindahl noted the 12- acre parcel could not be developed unless the property to the east was developed and provided a road connection, and when the house to the east was constructed, there was a condition of approval that a road easement be provided as part of any future subdivision. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the OS&P plat standards, noting parcel upland area is currently greater than 50 percent, but will decrease over time as wetland bank grows. City Planner Lindahl noted review of the OS&P 50 percent upland standard will need to be considered by Council. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the proposed septic system and noted it will be the first shared septic system in Corcoran and as part of the PUD requires significant information to ensure continued maintenance and plans in the case of failure . City Planner Lindahl reviewed the private drive city standards, native prairie landscaping, protected shoreland and floodplain in the south portion of the parcel and noted a private walking trail on the north side of the site. City Planner Lindahl noted a long-term parks plan is for a trail running south of the property and creek, indicating however accessing the future trail could be difficult long-term, and an interim on-road trail on County Road 117 is proposed. Council commented on concept of sketch plan and discussed the upland and wetland transition over time. Chris Rains, applicant, responded approximately 47 acres of the wetland bank exist, 50 percent of that will remain upland, and 50 percent will be wetland, and are likely within two acres of knowing exactly how much and where the water will be and contained to a specific area. Mr. Rains stated the city code indicates the conservation easement will be dedicated to the city, however, the state will ultimately oversee compliance of the easement. Council discussed the permanent wetland bank conservation. Mayor Thomas called a recess at 10:06 pm. Mayor Thomas reconvened Council at 10:10 pm. 9. Unfinished Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate telephonically during the Public Comment opportunity for Unfinished Business items included on the agenda. Administrative Services Director Beise 5 explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. a. 66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements Public Works Director Mattson presented bid results to Council and reviewed history of the 66 th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements progress. Public Works Director Mattson reviewed each of the four bids received, and noted New Look Contracting, Inc., was the low bid at $1,908,607.40. Council and staff discussed other bids received and the City’s experience regarding change orders with contractors and the difference between high and low bids. Council noted the project is funded by the developer and the City is required to accept the lowest qualified bidder. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Schultz to authorize contingent notice of award for the construction of the 66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) b. Appaloosa Woods Street Improvements Public Works Director Mattson outlined previous Council authorization for preparation and specifications for the Appaloosa Woods Street Improvements. Public Works Director Mattson noted the cul de sac drive was straightened and made more circular bringing it up to current cul de sac standards. Public Works Director Mattson outlined the project schedule with bid opening on May 4, an improvement hearing on May 13, assessment hearing to be determined, and construction in 2021. Public Works Director Mattson reviewed the total special assessment funds were lower than anticipated at $168,750 and noted if project costs are more than estimated amounts, local funds will be utilized to cover costs. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Thomas to accept plans and specifications, and authorize bidding for the Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Project as an alternate bid to the Maple Grove 2021 Street Reconstruction Project. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) 10. New Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate telephonically during the Public Comment opportunity for New Business items included on the agenda. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting. No residents participated in the Public Comment opportunity . a. 2021 Dust Control Program City Administrator Martens outlined the 2021 Dust Control Program and noted calcium chloride is the product applied to approximately 27 miles of gravel road; with fees remaining consistent for collector roads at $81.51, and varied fees on neighborhood roads, with fee s assessed if not paid. City Administrator Martens noted the project is approximately $111,000. City Administrator Martens added the City continues to reduce the cost impact to residents over time. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Bottema to approve Resolution 2021-32 Calling for a Public Hearing on the Potential Assessment of the Cost of Dust Control Treatments to be Applied to City Streets in 2021. Council and staff discussed the City increased share of dust control costs every two years was implemented to ease the burden on residents living on gravel roads. Council suggested st aff review the positive aspects of dust control pertaining to gravel road maintenance when future budgeting for the item is discussed. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) b. Corcoran Trail East/West Improvements Finance Plan City Administrator Martens noted finalizing the feasibility study with the recommendation of rehabilitation and reconstruction of the road. City Administrator Martens noted an overlay only would not provide sufficient relief to the roadway as the roadway is over 35 years old. City Administrator 6 Martens reviewed the reconstruction of the road would include paving the gravel portion on southern segment on east and west, and removing pavement on the northern sections, and repaving the road. Council discussed properties that would have received benefit of a no-cost overlay and discussed a one-time credit for the assessment for an overlay to appropriate properties. Council and staff discussed future processes for special assessments, public hearing, resident notices, and finalizing the feasibility study. Council consensus directed staff proceed as discussed. c. Planning Commission Appointment Staff and Council reviewed the vacant Planning Commission seat and the three candidate applications for the Planning Commission seat. Council discussed applicant credentials and parameters surrounding selected candidate. Council noted interest by one of the applicants to serve on the Charter Commission. MOTION: made by McKee, seconded by Nichols to appoint Mark Lanterman to the vacant Planning Commission seat with the term ending February 29, 2024. Council noted Mr. Lanterman’s past communication, perspective, legal and law enforcement background knowledge, and passion for the future of Corcoran. Council encouraged the other applicant to stay involved with the City in another capacity. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) d. 2021 Work Session Schedule City Administrator Martens noted future compensation philosophy work session options and joint work session with the Planning Commission on May 13 and June 10, respectively. Mayor McKee called future work sessions for May 13 and June 10, 2021. e. Full-Time Police Officer Job Offer Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the recent hiring process for three full-time police officer openings. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted one position has been filled, and staff is requesting authorization from Council to extend a conditional employment offer to Josh Lawson for full-time police officer. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk updated Council on the third vacant police officer position, and requested Council approve a secondary round of new applicants. Council asked if there is interest in the canine officer position. Director of Public Safety Gottscha lk noted the 16-week process of onboarding officers and indicated discussions for the canine officer opportunity would be a later date with interested personnel. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Nichols to authorize staff to extend a conditional employment offer to Josh Lawson for the position of full-time police officer. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) f. Resolution Accepting 2020 Donations City Administrator Martens noted the resolution would normally be created after Corcoran Country Daze to acknowledge and thank donors and participants for donations, however, with the pandemic, and Corcoran Country Daze cancellation in 2020, the resolution accepting donations was never created. Administrative Services Director Beise noted the donations were received for Corcoran Truck Safety and included monetary and in-kind donations. MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by McKee to approve Resolution 2021-34 Accepting 2020 Donations. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) 11. Staff Reports a. Active Corcoran Planning Applications. Council received report. 7 b. Pandemic Response Update Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the increase in vaccinations of 2.3 million people with at least one vaccination and 1.75 million people with completed series of the vaccination. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk mentioned there is a secondary daily peak experience due to COVID fatigue and people being more mobile with the restrictions slowing lifting. Director of Public Safety Gottschalk noted the continued effort to remain safe and follow health precautions as Minnesota continues to move towards a more vaccinated state. Staff continues to follow the CDC guidelines, and follow modified, normal operations within the City Hall. City Administrator Martens noted baseball season recreation programming has begun and Recreation Coordinator Christensen-Buck has included a preparedness plan for safety of participants and training for coaches. Director of Public Safety noted the gun safety field day training is on schedule for April 25 and includes appropriate PPE with participants and instructors following precautions and safety plans. 12. 2021 City Council Schedule City Administrator Martens reviewed upcoming Council items and noted the upcoming work sessions scheduled and reminded Council of Corcoran Clean Up Day on May 1, 2021. City Administrator Martens noted request of a future agenda item concerning development construction hours. 13. Adjournment MOTION: made by Bottema, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 10:55 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Work Session Minutes May 13, 2021 – 5:30 pm The Corcoran City Council met on May 13, 2021, in Corcoran, Minnesota. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 13D.021 and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council meeting was held remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee was present at City Hall. Councilor Bottema, Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Thomas were present via telephonic or other electronic means. City Administrator Martens and Administrative Services Director Beise were present at City Hall. Public Works Director Mattson and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk were present via telephonic or other electronic means. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor McKee called the work session to order at 5:30 pm. 2.City Discussion for Compensation Philosophy City Administrator Martens outlined the grading and step compensation structure for city employees and reviewed different options for compensation philosophies. City Administrator Martens presented similar peer group cities, including size, tax base, and population for compensation comparison. Council noted differences in the city peer group locations along Lake Minnetonka, noting Corcoran does not have the same natural amenities as peer cities selected. Council noted peer cities selected likely do compete for same set of candidates and noted falling into the mid-point of selected cities as a goal to align with a future competitive, compensation structure. Council noted compensation structure and benefits package are both factors in locating an average mid-point for compensation. Council discussed recognizing the difference in administrative departments and union departments regarding compensation. Council and staff discussed roles within the city and organizational impacts in relation to job descriptions. City Administrator Martens outlined the city’s current job evaluation system, job descriptions, and noting further evaluation for employees within positions that have credentials exceeding requirements of position and how compensation is structured. Council discussed expected budget impacts for new positions and would like a better understanding if the budget number is an entry-level position, mid-range, etc., for attracting qualified personnel to the city. 3.Unscheduled Items No unscheduled business was heard. 4.Adjournment MOTION: made by Thomas, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye: McKee, Bottema, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 5:0) Meeting adjourned at 6:01 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk Agenda Item 7c. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7d. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Michelle Friedrich Topic: Draft Minutes of the May 13, 2021 Regular Council Meeting Action Required: Informational Summary: Draft Minutes of the May 13, 2021 regular Council Meeting will be provided separately to Councilmembers via email and will be placed in the City Hall Agenda Packet and on the website when available. The anticipated date is the week of May 24, 2021. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item s 7e. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Claims Action Required: Informational Summary : Escrow Claims (Fund #500) and All Other Financial Claims will be provided separately to Councilmembers via email and will be placed in the City Hall Agenda Packet and on the website when available. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7f. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: City Hall Remodel –Change Order #6; Furniture Purchase Action Required: Approval Summary: Work continues on the City Hall remodel project. Two action items are requested from the City Council as outlined below: 1. Change order #6 a. This sixth change order is to increase the overall contract by $10,387.70 as outlined below: i. Relocate regist er: $189.00 1. Move register to a different location as directed by s taff. ii. Door changes: $1,416.50 1. Door adjustments needed for proper operation with key car d access. iii. Door work: $5,155.50 1. Door adjustments needed for proper operation with key card access. iv. Emergency lighting: $3,626.70 1. Emergency lighting additions/changes to m eet building code. 2. Furniture Purchase: $15,241.97 a. Director of Public Safety Office: $5,725.45 i. Furniture could not be saved and re-purposed as anticipated. b. Detective Office: $2,283.85 i. Furniture could not be saved and re-purposed as anticipated. c. Other furniture: $5,207.69 i. Variety of other furniture to meet ne eds for the remodel . d. Freight and delivery: $2,025 (estimate) i. To be billed based on actual cost . Financial/Budget: The additional costs have resulted in a projection that the remodel may go slightly above the original budget allocation. The current projection is an overage of $783 or 0.1%. Many of the additional items from change orders were unknowns which have been covered in our soft cost allocations. It is likely that one additional change order will be required prior to completion of the project. Budget Category Approve d A mount Projected Amount 5/20/21 Construction $396,500 $442,041 Technology $120,000 $88,500 Furniture $120,000 $166,742 Soft Costs $90,000 $30,000 Total $726,500 $727,283 Council Action: Approve Change Order #6 and authorize the furniture p urchase for the City Hall remodel project. Attachments: 1. Change Order #6 2. Furniture Quote Document G701™ – 2017 Change Order AIA Document G701™ – 2017. Copyright © 1979, 1987, 2000 , 2001 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. The “American Institute of Architects,” “AIA,” the AIA Logo, and “AIA Contract Documents” are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission. This document was produced by AIA software at 18:08:06 ET on 05/19/2021 under Order No.7441252328 which expires on 01/11/2022, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (3B9ADA52) 1 PROJECT: (Name and address)CONTRACT INFORMATION:CHANGE ORDER INFORMATION: Corcoran City Hall and Police Remodel (182292) Contract For: General Construction Change Order Number: Six (6) 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, Minnesota 55340 Date: August 3, 2020 Date: May 19, 2021 OWNER: (Name and address)ARCHITECT: (Name and address)CONTRACTOR: (Name and address) City of Corcoran Wold Architects and Engineers Weber, Inc. 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, Minnesota 55340 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 2497 Seventh Avenue East, #110 North Saint Paul, Minnesota 55109 THE CONTRACT IS CHANGED AS FOLLOWS: (Insert a detailed description of the change and, if applicable, attach or reference specific exhibits. Also include agreed upon adjustments attributable to executed Construction Change Directives.) PCO #010 – HVAC Punchlist Items. Add $189.00 PCO #013 – Owner Requests at Openings E136 and A145. Add $1,416.50 PR #014-R – Hardware. Add $5,155.50 PR #016 – Exit Signage. Add $3,626.70 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 ADD $10,387.70 The original Contract Sum was $396,500.00 The net change by previously authorized Change Orders $35,153.04 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was $431,653.04 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order in the amount of $10,387.70 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $442,040.74 The Contract Time will be unchanged by Zero (0) days. The new date of Substantial Completion will be May 7, 2021 NOTE: This Change Order does not include adjustments to the Contract Sum or Guaranteed Maximum Price, or the Contract Time, that have been authorized by Construction Change Directive until the cost and time have been agreed upon by both the Owner and Contractor, in which case a Change Order is executed to supersede the Construction Change Directive. NOT VALID UNTIL SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT, CONTRACTOR AND OWNER. Wold Architects and Engineers Weber, Inc.City of Corcoran ARCHITECT (Firm name)CONTRACTOR (Firm name)OWNER (Firm name) SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME AND TITLE PRINTED NAME AND TITLE PRINTED NAME AND TITLE DATE DATE DATE Andrew Dahlquist - PM 5/19/2021 PROPOSAL REQUEST Distribution: ☒ Brad Martens, City of Corcoran ☒ George Sinn, Weber ☒ Ivan Weiss, Weber ☒ Reide Weber, Weber ☐ Magnus Carlsson, BKBM ☐ Pat Jansen, Wold ☐ John Maust, Wold ☐ Steve Skarvan, Wold ☐ Jared Frazier, Wold ☐ Michelle Klein, Wold ☒ Andrew Dahlquist, Wold ☒ Derek Gallagher, Wold City of Corcoran City Hall & Police Remodel Weber Construction Attn: George Sinn 2497 7th Avenue East, Suite 110 North Saint Paul, MN 55109 Phone: 651.770.5350 Mobile: 651.755.0268 Email: gsinn@webercompanies.com Submit an itemized (labor and material) quotation for the proposed modifications to the contract documents as described herein within 21 days of receipt. If a cost is not submitted within 21 days, this Proposal Request can be accepted at no additional cost. Written approval is required prior to proceeding with this change. COST EXPECTATIONS: ☐ DEDUCT ☐ NO COST ☒ ADD PR: #014-R Comm: #182292 Const. Pkg: N/A Item Description See the revisions to this PR in bold underline below. Sheet A2.0 has also been reissued to provide clarity about where new actuator buttons are to be located. 14.1 At Door E136, provide and install closer arm: LCN 9540. 14.2 At Door E141, provide and install: · Electric strike: VON 6400 · Power Supply: VON PS902 2RS 14.3 At Door A109, provide and install the following hardware to coordinate with owner’s added card reader: · Electric strike: VON 6400 · Note, power supply by owner’s security supplier. 14.4 At door into Room A131: · Provide Mortise Lock L9456 L283-722 · Field prep existing door to receive lock · Function: CORRIDOR LOCK w/INDICATOR. LATCHBOLT RETRACTED BY LEVER FROM EITHER SIDE. DEADBOLT THROWN OR RETRACTED BY KEY OUTSIDE OR INSIDE THUMBTURN. THROWING DEADBOLT LOCKS OUTSIDE LEVER. TURNING INSIDE LEVER SIMULTANEOUSLY RETRACTS DEADBOLT AND LATCHBOLT AND UNLOCKS OUTSIDE LEVER. OUTSIDE INDICATOR DISPLAYS OCCUPIED/VACANT 14.5 Provide and install (10) handicap actuator buttons per model number listed below. Replace existing wireless buttons at (8) locations and install (2) at new location at interior of Door E136. Handicap Actuator: LCN 8310-856 Attachments: A2.0 Issued By: Derek Gallagher Date: 04/23/2021 DN REF GARAGE A145 MECH A146 TOILET A144 CIRC A141 BOOKING A142 VEST A136 TOILET A131 MECH A125 OFFICE A126 OFFICE A127 VEST A114 CONFERENCE A110 CONFERENCE A103 OPEN OFFICE A100 STOR A107 MECH A116 TOILET A112 JAN A113 TOILET A111 SQUAD ROOM A137 STORAGE A124 CIRC A132 VEST A101 CIRC A108 EVIDENCE STORAGE A140 PUBLIC LOBBY A115 LOCKERS A143 EOC A122INTERVIEW A134 CIRC A128 OFFICE A130 CIRC A138A133 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 _______F6 A2.0 COUNCIL CHAMBERS A117 EVIDENCE PROCESSING A139 E101A E114A SEC INT A133 3 MOTHER'S ROOM A109 OFFICE A105 OFFICE A106 KITCHENETTE A104 COAT ROOM A102 KITCHENETTE A123 OFFICE A120 CIRC A119 OFFICE A135 POLICE RECEPTION A129 COPY A121 RECEPTION A118 9 EXIST QUARRY TILE CPT A103 A100AA105A106A118A122A120 A119A109 A128 A140E114B E115A E115B 10b 11 1110a 23 11 11 E143 A137A12 CPT-2CPT-1 ELEV SEE 12 12A145A E136 E141 A145B11 +/- 7'-6" L3 L2 L1 22'-0" C5 A5.1 _______D6 A2.0 13 13 13 13 13 13 ALIGN WITH NEAREST WHOLE BRICK COURSE ALIGN WITH NEAREST WHOLE BRICK COURSE ALIGN WITH NEAREST WHOLE BRICK COURSE C3 A5.1 12'-9"14'-5" 2'-5" 15'-0"5'-0"GA2 GA2 GA2 GB3 ALIGN A5.1 D1 A5.1 F1 A137B 4'-10"4'-10"EXISTMATCH7 GA2 GA2 GA2 MBD 6'-0" 5 MBD 6'-0" 5 MBD 6'-0" 5 MBD 6'-0" 5 E101B 2 11 E1281 1 1 1E124 E12311 11 1 E11611 1 E115C E115D 11 1 11E1071 11 E110 A100B1 8" 4 E132GE2 A147AA147B ALIGN DATA A147 11 19 20 A5.1 C1 MBD 8'-0" 5 21 MBD 8'-0" 5 21 21 2121 6'-0"VIF4 A6.2 F6 2 GB2 2 18 18 2 2 24 25 5 E2 A3.0 6 6 18 18 3 26 27 27 10 10 2'-2"2'-0"GB1GB1 28 _______D5 A6.4 20SIM 20SIM 10 29 10 12 19 12 19 19 19 19 12 19 19 19 19 12 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: 1 CARD READER, SEE ELEC. 2 SEE MECH FOR FIXTURE REPLACEMENT. 3 INFILL EXISTING WOOD STUD AND GYP BD WALL TO MATCH EXISTING. 5 REINSTALL EXISTING CHANGING STATION. 4 PROVIDE LOUVER BLINDS AT BORROWED LIGHT. 6 PATCH GYP BD REMOVED FOR MECHANICAL WORK. 7 SEE STRUCTURAL FOR INSTALLATION OF WOOD POSTS AND STEEL BEAM. 8 REPLACE GLAZING AT EXISTING HOLLOW METAL SIDELIGHT WITH SECURITY GLAZING. VERIFY DIMENSIONS IN FIELD. 9 CUT DOWN EXISTING COAT RACK AND SHELF TO FIT NEW ROOM DIMENSIONS AND REINSTALL. 10a REMOVE EXTERIOR DOOR PANELS AND REINSTALL IN INTERIOR FRAME. 10b REMOVE INTERIOR DOOR PANELS AND REINSTALL IN EXTERIOR FRAME. 11 REMOVE HARDWARE FROM EXISTING DOOR TO REMAIN AS REQUIRED AND INSTALL NEW HARDWARE PER DOOR/HARDWARE REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE. 12 PATCH WALL AT REMOVED WALL / ITEM. 13 SEE STRUCTURAL FOR INSTALLATION OF WOOD POSTS. PATCH MASONRY WALL WITH SALVAGED FACE BRICK AS REQUIRED AT NEW LOUVER. COORDINATE WITH LOUVER DETAILS. 14 REINSTALL EXISTING PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER. 15 REINSTALL EXISTING HAND DRYER, SEE ELEC. 16 PROVIDE P TILE BASE AS SCHED. 17 REINSTALL EXISTING GRAB BARS. SEE TYPICAL MOUNTING DETAILS FOR LOCATIONS. 18 FLOOR BOX, SEE ELECTRICAL. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH OWNER'S FURNITURE VENDOR. 19 DOOR ACTUATOR, SEE ELEC. 20 PATCH SLAB AT LOCATIONS SAW-CUT FOR MECHANICAL OR ELECTRICAL WORK. APPROXIMATE EXTENTS INDICATED BY CONCRETE HATCH PATTERN, COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL WORK. 21 MONITOR LOCATION, SEE ELEC. PROVIDE 3/4" PLYWOOD BLOCKING ATTACHED TO THREE STUDS MINIMUM AND PAINT TO MATCH WALL. PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR 60" MONITOR; COORDINATE EXACT DIMENSIONS / MOUNTING HEIGHT WITH OWNER AND ARCHITECT. 22 PROVIDE NEW TOILET PARTITIONS THROUGHOUT PER LAYOUT INDICATED ON PLAN. 23 REMOVE HARDWARE FROM THE EXISTING DOOR AND SALVAGE FOR REINSTALLATION IN THE DOOR PANEL BEING INSTALLED IN THIS ALUMINUM FRAME. 24 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING CONC BLOCK BEARING WALL ABOVE DOOR. REMOVE ONLY AS MUCH BLOCK AS IS REQUIRED FOR NEW DUCTWORK, SEE MECH DRAWINGS. 25 ELECTRICAL PANEL, SEE ELEC. 26 INFILL WALL AT ABANDONED LOUVER. SEE MECHANICAL FOR BLANK-OFF PANEL. SEE ALSO DETAIL F1/A2.0 27 PATCH ABANDONED ABOVE-CEILING PENETRATIONS. 28 REINSTALL SALVAGED GLAZING 29 PATCH FLOOR AT DEMOLISHED BEARING WALL AND PROVIDE SELF-LEVELING TOPPING AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN SLAB ELEVATIONS. FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES: REFER TO DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR: A. ABBREVIATIONS, MATERIAL SYMBOLS B. MOUNTING HEIGHTS C. LINTEL SCHEDULE D. MATERIAL FINISH/COLOR SCHEDULE E. WALL TYPES F. MARKER BD TYPES AND MOUNTING HTS THE ABOVE SECTIONS ARE LISTED FOR REFERENCE ONLY, AND ARE NOT EXCLUSIVE TO AREAS OF WORK. ALL DETAILS SHALL BE REVIEWED FOR SCOPE OF WORK. FIRE RATED WALLS ARE INDICATED ON CODE PLANS. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL TO FACE OF WALL. WALL THICKNESSES ARE SHOWN NOMINAL, SEE WALL TYPES FOR ACTUAL THICKNESS. ALL GYP. WALLS ARE TO BE 5 INCHES THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS ARE TO BE 8 INCHES THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL DUCT AND SHAFT OPENINGS IN WALLS AND FLOORS W/ MECH. AND ELEC. PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED LINTELS FOR OPENINGS. SEE LINTEL SCHEDULE. FIELD VERIFY ALL MILLWORK OPENINGS. SET FLOOR DRAINS 3/4" BELOW FINISHED CONCRETE FLOORS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROVIDE CONSISTENT SLOPE FROM WALL TO DRAIN BY SLOPING CONCRETE, MIN. 1/4" PER FOOT. VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND QUANTITY OF ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PADS. ALL DOOR/SIDELITE OPENINGS TO BEGIN 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL GYP. WALLS ARE CENTERED ON GRID UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. SEE DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR ABBREVIATIONS 1. IF ALL WALLS IN ROOM HAVE THE SAME FINISH, THE "N WALL-TYP" COLUMN WILL BE USED. 2. DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE AND DRAWINGS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR FINISH DETERMINATION. 3. ON WALLS WHICH ARE COVERED WITH MILLWORK AND TACK SURFACES, A FINISH SHALL NOT BE APPLIED TO THE WALL BEHIND EXCEPT FOR LOCATIONS WHICH MAY BE EXPOSED (I.E. SPACE BETWEEN MILLWORK AND TACK SURFACE.) CONCRETE BLOCK BEHIND MILLWORK AND MARKERBOARDS TO BE TOOLED. 4. REFER TO MATERIAL FINISH/ COLOR SCHEDULE FOR SPECIFIC FINISH TYPES AND COLORS. 5. ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES 6. WALLS ARE SCHEDULED BASED ON PLAN NORTH. SEE FOR CARPET INSTALLATION PATTERNS.7.B5/A6.1 SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATIONS AND EXTENT OF WALL TO RECEIVE MULTIPLE FINISHES.1. 2. 3. ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE REMARKS PROVIDE CARPET TO EXTENTS INDICATED ON FLOOR PLAN. PROVIDE FINISH AT NEW WALLS ONLY, SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 4.PROVIDE P TILE BASE AT NEW WALLS ONLY, SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 5.PROVIDE P TILE FLOOR TILE ONLY AS REQUIRED FOR FLOOR PATCHING RELATED TO MECHANICAL WORK. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR APPROXIMATE EXTENTS, AND COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL. FOR FRAME DEPTH, ONLY EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING TABLE ARE SCHEDULED: GYPSUM BOARD PARTITIONS: THROAT OF FRAME TO MATCH WALL THICKNESS. MASONRY PARTITIONS: 4" WALL: 3 3/4" FRAME 6" WALL: 5 3/4" FRAME 8" AND GREATER WALL: 7 3/4" FRAME FRAME DEPTHS ARE SCHEDULED IN NOMINAL DIMENSIONS. SEE FRAME/ DOOR TYPES FOR CORRESPONDING ACTUAL DIMENSIONS. ALL DOORS ARE 1 3/4" THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FOR GLASS TYPES, ONLY EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING TABLE ARE SCHEDULED: INTERIOR NON RATED: CLEAR (SAFETY WHEN REQUIRED BY TABLE IN GLAZING SPECIFICATION.) INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR RATED: FIRE RATED EXTERIOR NON-RATED: CLEAR INSULATED (SAFETY INSULATED WHEN REQUIRED BY TABLE IN GLAZING SPECIFICATION.) SEE SHEET FOR FRAME AND DOOR TYPES. 1. 2. 3. 4. DOOR SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES A3.0 PROVIDE HORIZONTAL LOUVER BLINDS AT BORROWED LIGHT. PROVIDE SECURITY GLAZING.1. 2. DOOR SCHEDULE REMARKS REINSTALL SALVAGED DOOR PANEL IN NEW FRAME. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD AND COORDINATE NEW FRAME WITH EXISTING OPENING AND DOOR PANEL DIMENSIONS. 3. VERIFY EXISTING OPENING DIMENSIONS.4. 6'-6"1"3'-0"1"3'-0"1"5'-0"5'-0" 6'-6"3'-0"1"5'-0"5'-0"7'-3"5 A5.1D6 7'-3"_______E1 A6.4 _______E1 A6.4 A5.1 D4 S. DISP S. DISP S. DISP S. DISP 5 HAND DRYER 66 14 14 15 A6.1 F1 F1 17 17 TPH TPH TPH TPH TPH TPH S.N.R. NO. 2 S.N.R. NO. 2 TOILETRY SHELF TOILETRY SHELF TOILETRY SHELF TOILETRY SHELF M No. 3M No. 3 A6.1 F1 F1 TOILET A112 TOILET A111 20 20 20 20 22 2211 REINSTALL EXISTING HOLLOW METAL FRAME AND WOOD DOOR SALVAGED FROM ROOM A140 IN EXISTING OPENING. REPLACE EXISTING GLAZING WITH SECURITY GLAZING. SEE ELEVATION FOR MORE INFORMATION. INSTALL HARDWARE PER SCHEDULE. REINSTALL EXISTING HARDWARE.1. 2. DOOR/HARDWARE REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE REMARKS C4/A3.0 DOOR/HARDWARE REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES ALL FRAMES AND DOOR PANELS ARE EXISTING UNLESS NOTED SPECIFICALLY BY REMARKS. 1. FRAMES AND PANEL MATERIAL AND DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL EXISTING FRAMES AND PANELS TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD BY CONTRACTOR. 2. REINSTALL THE EXISTING HARDWARE REMOVED FROM THE DOOR PREVIOUSLY MOUNTED IN THIS INTERIOR ALUMINUM FRAME. 3. A5.1 F518"30"60"5'-2"ALIGN 1 3 5 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 "A5.1F3 A5.1 F618"16 1616 1 16 WALL BELOW 5'-2" 4" 4"4"GROMMET GROMMET 2"2"P LAM-1 COUNTERTOP SUPPORTED BY CONCEALED BRACKETS IN WALL 4'-4"GA2 GA2 GA2 GA2 A1185'-0"13'-2 3/8"135°8 8 EXISTING BRICK / WOOD STUD WALL EXISTING LOUVER TO REMAIN INSULATED DUCT CAP, SEE MECH INFILL REMAINING DEPTH OF WALL WITH MTL STUD FRAMING AND EXTERIOR BATT INSULATION. PROVIDE TOTAL INSULATIVE VALUE OF R-20. 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD FLUSH WITH FACE OF EXISTING WALL F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH 4/23/2021 5:32:19 PMCorcoran City Hall & Police (Central)_detached.rvtAs indicated City of Corcoran Corcoran City Hall & Police Remodel A2.0 FLOOR PLAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, Minnesota 55340 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, Minnesota 55340 AD DG 05/22/2020 182292 MINNESOTA NA JOEL DUNNING 41467 ARCHITECT ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE ROOM NO ROOM NAME FLOOR BASE N WALL - TYP E WALL S WALL W WALL REMARKSMATL FIN MATL FIN MATL FIN MATL FIN A100 OPEN OFFICE CPT-2 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A EXIST PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A A101 VEST CPT-1 VB-1 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST A102 COAT ROOM CPT-1 VB-1 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST GYP BD PT-6A EXIST EXIST A103 CONFERENCE CPT-2 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A104 KITCHENETTE VCT-1 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A105 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-1 GYP BD PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A106 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-1 GYP BD PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A EXIST / GYP BD PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A107 STOR EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST / GYP BD PT-6A EXIST EXIST A108 CIRC CPT-1 VB-1 EXIST / GYP BD PT-6A EXIST / GYP BD PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A109 MOTHER'S ROOM CPT-2 VB-1 GYP BD PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A110 CONFERENCE CPT-2 VB-1 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST A111 TOILET EXIST / P TILE-4 EXIST / C TILE-2 EXIST EXIST GYP BD C TILE-1, C TILE-2 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST 1, 5 A112 TOILET EXIST / P TILE-4 EXIST / C TILE-2 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST GYP BD C TILE-1, C TILE-2 1, 5 A115 PUBLIC LOBBY EXIST / CPT-1 EXIST / P TILE-3 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST / GYP BD EXIST / PT-6A 2, 3, 4 A117 COUNCIL CHAMBERS CPT-3 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST A118 RECEPTION CPT-2 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A119 CIRC CPT-2 VB-1 GYP BD PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A A120 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A A121 COPY CPT-2 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A122 EOC CPT-2 VB-2 EXIST PT-6B GYP BD PT-6B EXIST PT-6B EXIST PT-6B A123 KITCHENETTE CPT-2 VB-2 -- -- EXIST / GYP BD PT-6B EXIST PT-6B EXIST PT-6B A126 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-1 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST A127 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-2 EXIST PT-6B EXIST PT-6B EXIST PT-6B EXIST PT-6B A128 CIRC CPT-1 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A129 POLICE RECEPTION CPT-2 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A130 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-2 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST A132 CIRC CPT-1 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A133 SEC INT VCT-1 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST / GYP BD PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A134 INTERVIEW CPT-2 VB-2 EXIST PT-6B EXIST PT-6B EXIST PT-6B EXIST EXIST A135 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-2 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST A136 VEST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST PT-6B EXIST EXIST A137 SQUAD ROOM CPT-1 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A EXIST / GYP BD PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A138 CIRC CPT-1 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A139 EVIDENCE PROCESSING VCT-1 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A140 EVIDENCE STORAGE PT CONC VB-2 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST PT-6A A141 CIRC EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST PT-6B EXIST EXIST EXIST PT-6B A142 BOOKING VCT-1 VB-1 EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A EXIST PT-6A A143 LOCKERS CPT-1 VB-2 EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST A147 DATA PT CONC VB-1 GYP BD PT-6A GYP BD PT-6A GYP BD GYP BD GYP BD PT-6A 0 1/8" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLANB1 6'12' DOOR / OPENING SCHEDULE DOOR NO DOOR / OPENING LABEL FRAME GL MOUNTING CONDITIONS HDW GRP REMARKSTYPE QTY WIDT H HEIGHT MATL TYPE DEPTH MATL HEAD JAMB SILL A100A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 3A -- HM -- B3/A6.3 B3/A6.3 -- 09 A100B EXIST 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- FR 1 -- HM -- B5/A6.3 E7/A6.3 B1/A6.3 21 3, 4 A103 N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 1 -- HM -- B3/A6.3 B3/A6.3 -- 08 4 A105 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 3A -- HM -- F7/A6.3 F7/A6.3 -- 08 2 A106 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 3A -- HM -- F7/A6.3 F7/A6.3 -- 08 2 A109 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD FR 1 -- HM -- F7/A6.3 F7/A6.3 -- 07 A118 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 3A -- HM -- F7/A6.3 F7/A6.3 -- 11 A119 G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 1 -- HM -- B3/A6.3 B3/A6.3 -- 06 4 A120 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 3A -- HM -- F7/A6.3 F7/A6.3 -- 08 2 A122 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 1 -- HM -- F7/A6.3 F7/A6.3 -- 09 A128 N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 1 -- HM SEC GL B3/A6.3 B3/A6.3 -- 05 4 A133 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 1B -- HM -- E4/A6.3 E5/A6.3 -- 25 A137A EXIST 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 1 -- HM -- E4/A6.3 E5/A6.3 --04 3, 4 A137B -- 0 6'-0" 7'-2" -- -- FR 5A -- HM SEC GL E1/A6.3 E2/A6.3 -- -- 1, 2 A140 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- FR 1 -- HM -- B3/A6.3 B3/A6.3 -- 09 A145A EXIST 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- FR 1B -- HM -- B5/A6.3 E7/A6.3 B1/A6.3 04 3, 4 A145B F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM 90 MIN FR 1B -- HM -- E4/A6.3 E5/A6.3 -- 10 4 A147A F 2 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 1 -- HM -- F7/A6.3 F7/A6.3 -- 22 A147B F 2 2'-0" 7'-0" WD -- FR 1 -- HM -- F7/A6.3 F7/A6.3 -- 22 0 3/8" = 1'-0" ENLARGED TOILET ROOM PLANF6 2' 4' DOOR/HARDWARE REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE DOOR NO DOOR / OPENING LABEL FRAME HDW GRP REMARKSTYPE QTY MATL MATL E101A AL 1 AL -- AL 02 E101B AL 1 AL -- AL 15 E107 F 2 WD -- HM 20 E110 F 1 WD -- HM 18 E114A AL 1 AL -- AL 01 E114B AL 1 AL -- AL 14 E115A AL 1 AL -- AL -- 3 E115B AL 1 AL -- AL -- 3 E115C AL 1 AL -- AL 19 E115D AL 1 AL -- AL 19 E116 F 1 WD -- HM 18 E123 F 1 WD -- HM 16 E124 F 1 WD -- HM 18 E128 F 1 WD -- HM 17 E132 EXIST 1 WD -- HM 24 1, 2 E136 AL 1 AL -- AL 03 E141 AL 1 AL -- AL 23 E143 F 1 WD -- HM 12 0 1/4" = 1'-0" ENLARGED RECEPTION COUNTER PLAND6 3' 6' Revisions Description Date Num Addendum #01 06/09/2020 1 Addendum #02 06/12/2020 2 PR #01 10/16/2020 3 PR #02 10/21/2020 4 PR #03 11/09/2020 5 PR #04 11/18/2020 6 PR #05 12/07/2020 7 SI #002 02/01/2021 8 PR #011 02/15/2021 9 PR #012 02/24/2021 10 PR #013 03/04/2021 11 PR #014-R 04/23/2021 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 0 1 1/2" = 1'-0" INFILL AT ABANDONED LOUVERF1 1/2'1' 7 7 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 PROPOSAL REQUEST Distribution: ☒ Brad Martens, City of Corcoran ☒ George Sinn, Weber ☒ Ivan Weiss, Weber ☒ Reide Weber, Weber ☐ Magnus Carlsson, BKBM ☐ Pat Jansen, Wold ☐ John Maust, Wold ☐ Steve Skarvan, Wold ☐ Jared Frazier, Wold ☐ Michelle Klein, Wold ☒ Andrew Dahlquist, Wold ☒ Derek Gallagher, Wold City of Corcoran City Hall & Police Remodel Weber Construction Attn: George Sinn 2497 7th Avenue East, Suite 110 North Saint Paul, MN 55109 Phone: 651.770.5350 Mobile: 651.755.0268 Email: gsinn@webercompanies.com Submit an itemized (labor and material) quotation for the proposed modifications to the contract documents as described herein within 21 days of receipt. If a cost is not submitted within 21 days, this Proposal Request can be accepted at no additional cost. Written approval is required prior to proceeding with this change. COST EXPECTATIONS: ☐ DEDUCT ☐ NO COST ☒ ADD PR: # 016 Comm: #182292 Const. Pkg: N/A Item Description Provide labor and material breakdown for each Item 016.1 Provide added exit and emergency lighting units. 016.2 Room A136 - Relocate Door hardware to exterior wall. 016.3 Locate sleeve / grommets at Room A118-A115 as discussed with Owner on-site 4-26-21 . PROPOSAL REQUEST PR: # 016 Comm: #182292 Const. Pkg: N/A Page 2 Item Description Attachments: E1.0, E2.0, E6.0 Issued By: Steve Skarvan Date: 04/28/2021 Date: City of Corcoran - Additional Product (v2) Item No.Vendor Product Description Qty Sell Price Extended Sell Workstation Finishes Nuform - Swiss Elm Paint - Steel Wool Panel Fabrics - Meander, Overcast - Overall Punch Card, Cadet - Accent Tackboards - Punch Card, Cadet - Accent 1 Office 1 $5,333.51 $5,333.51 Extended Ptop Worksurface (84" x 42") Stage 2 height adjustable worksurface with tapered edge, 24" x 48" return, 24" x 84" credenza with 36" wide 2 drawers lateral and Box/Box/File pedestal. (2) 42" wide overhead storage bins, tackboards, task lights. 42"w x 18"d x 64 3/8"h cabinet with hinged doors, 1 full width blank shelf, 3 half width shelves and 1 half width coat rod. 36"w x 63"h bookcase with 5 shelves. Nuform fronts on storage at desk only. Metal Modesty Panel. 1A Symmetry Under Cabinet Task lights - Qty of 2 - Daisy Chained 1 $227.70 $227.70 2 Clamp on Power Unit 1 $64.79 $64.79 3 power and 1 dual USB charger. Finish: White 3 CPU Holder 1 $99.45 $99.45 Retracts on a 17” track and swivels 360 degrees. Can accommodate a CPU weighing up to 75 lbs. and measuring up to 64” in perimeter. Equipped with a single tool adjustment ratchet device used to tighten and loosen the strap with an Allen key Finish: Black 4 Office 1 $1,770.26 $1,770.26 24" x 60" Stage 2 height adjustable worksurface with tapered edge, (1) 42" wide overhead storage bin with door, (1) 42" wide overhead storage bin with door, tackboard, task light. Metal Modesty Panel. (1) mobile Box/File pedestals with cushion. Inscape Inscape Account Manager: Karen O'Connell Attention:Matt Gottschalk 651-789-5543 Corcoran, MN 55340 Monday, May 11, 2020 Quote Summary Customer: Address:8200 county Road 116 Matt's Office Inscape Symmetry Office 130 5 Clamp on Power Unit 1 $64.79 $64.79 3 power and 1 dual USB charger. Finish: White 5A Symmetry Under Cabinet Task lights - Qty of 1 1 $106.85 $106.85 6 CPU Holder 1 $99.45 $99.45 Retracts on a 17” track and swivels 360 degrees. Can accommodate a CPU weighing up to 75 lbs. and measuring up to 64” in perimeter. Equipped with a single tool adjustment ratchet device used to tighten and loosen the strap with an Allen key Finish: Black 7 Dual Monitor Arm 1 $242.50 $242.50 Clamp on Dual Monitor Arm with Vesa plate. 2 pass-through USB ports. Finish: Silver 8 Worksurface 1 $623.58 $623.58 20" x 72" worksurface with post legs and (1) mobile Box/File pedestals with cushion. 9 Worksurface 1 $464.80 $464.80 24" x 36" worksurface with (1) File/File pedestal 10 42" Round Table 1 $390.50 $390.50 Classic X Round Table, 42" Diameter with 3mm Vinyl Edge, Standard Height - 29", Self Leveling Glides Finish: Wilsonart Canyon Zephyr, Metallic SilverD 11 Symmetry Under Cabinet Lights - Qty of 3 - Daisy Chained 3 $106.10 $318.31 12 Training Table 4 $792.00 $3,168.00 HPL, mobile rectangular table with flip-top mechanism, silver accent, 72"W x 30"D - No Modesty panel Finish: Fossil, Silver Accent 13 Dual Monitor Arm 1 $242.50 $242.50 Clamp on Dual Monitor Arm with Vesa plate. 2 pass-through USB ports. Finish: Silver $13,216.97 138 Circulation 100 Open Office Symmetry 127 Office Inscape 134 Interview Room Special T PD Vestibule Inscape Subtotal Summary Groupe Lacasse Inscape Symmetry Symmetry PD Reception $275.00 $0.00 $1,750.00 $0.00 All requests for changes, returns, or cancellations will be made at the manufacturer's discretion. Acceptance Date: Quote Good For: 50% deposit at time of order. Balance on "Product" will be invoiced at time of shipment from manufacturer. Remaining balance will be invoiced upon completion of "Delivery and Installation". We accept MasterCard and VISA, for an additional 3% convenience fee. Payment: Return Policy: Lead Time:Approximately 4-6 weeks Terms: Deposit Invoices - Due On Receipt. All Other Invoices - Net 10 Days. Freight and/or Fuel Surcharges (estimate only, actual to be billed) Delivery and Installation (estimate only, actual to be billed) Sales Tax (Tax Exempt) Grand Total Freight (estimate only, actual to be billed) Signature: Print Name: Installation:Includes the receipt, local delivery (Metro area) and non-union installation of the items included in this quotation during normal working hours (Overtime, holidays and weekends are available at an additional charge). Location of the installation is assumed to be on the first floor, or a freight elevator is readily available with adequate sized doors that will allow the proper access to the area. Tear down, removal or relocation of any existing furniture or Customer is responsible for the removal of computer and phone equipment and will ensure the area is clear prior to the installation. Wiring of computer cables and phone cords within the furniture system is available at an additional charge. Customer will be responsible for providing an electrician to hardwire any electrical components unless otherwise noted. If local electrical codes will not allow our furniture installers to install the power tracks and outlets, an additional charge will be incurred to have an electrician make these connections. Customer will be billed for any additional time that is incurred for items that are not included in the original agreement. Customer will be responsible for integrating any existing furniture (for example, placing existing file cabinets under work surfaces) within the new furniture that we are installing. 60 days Any deviation in the customer's space from the drawings and plans that were provided to us may require additional product and/or labor. The customer will be invoiced for these additional charges. I have read and agree with the terms stated in this proposal. Drawings/Plans: Terms $15,241.97 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7g. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Natalie Davis Topic: Hennepin County Corridor Planning Grant Application Action Required: Approval Summary: Hennepin County is currently accepting proposals for funding through the Corridor Planning program through June 8, 2021. The City of Corcoran is an eligible applicant. The City can request up to $50,000 to be awarded in funding for a project that supports improvements and redevelopment in transportation corridors, such as plans and preliminary designs for land use. The City Council and City Staff previously identified the need to update and expand upon the Northeast District Plan and Guidelines as a 2021 priority. Since this time, additional development interest in this area continues to increase as improvements along the County Road 101 transportation corridor are completed. City staff has prepared an application requesting $50,000 through the Corridor Planning program to move forward with updating the Corcoran Northeast District Plan. Financial/Budget: Applying for Hennepin County ’s Corridor Planning grant will not require additional funds allocated from the budget. If approved, the City of Corcoran is expected to match 5% of the rewarded funds towards the project. Recommendation: Move to adopt Resolution 2021-45 authorizing an application for grant funds and provide feedback on the draft application . Attachments: 1. Resolution 2021-45 2. Draft Corridor Planning Application 3. 2040 Comprehensive Plan p. 147-148 4. Existing Northeast District Plan in City Code 5. Existing Southeast District Plan in City Code City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-45 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT TO AUTHORIZE AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran is eligible to apply for a Corridor Planning grant through Hennepin County for 2021; WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran identified the need to update the Northeast District Plan and Guidelines as a 2021 priority to support anticipated development and ongoing improvements along the County Road 101 transportation corridor; WHEREAS, planning for Corcoran’s Northeast District meets the purpose and criteria of the Corridor Planning grant; WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to adequately manage a Hennepin County Corridor Planning grant; WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as defined in the grant agreement, if awarded. WHEREAS, the proposed project is consistent with and advances implementation of the City of Corcoran’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after due consideration, the Corcoran City Council: 1. Finds that the following proposed project meets the long-range development goals and immediate priorities of the City: Corcoran Northeast District Plan 2. Authorizes the Planner to submit on behalf of the City an application for funds through Hennepin County’s Corridor Planning grant for the Corcoran Northeast District Plan project identified in the application, and to execute such agreements necessary to implement the grant on behalf of the City. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-45 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of May 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director 2021 Housing & Economic Development Corridor Planning program Submittal Applications must be submitted through the Hennepin County Supplier Portal. Applications will be accepted through June 8, 2021. Application checklist ❑ Corridor Planning cover page (1 page) ❑ Corridor Planning application (3 page max) ❑ Map(s) of project area ❑ Letters or resolutions of support (recommended) ❑ Finalize submission in the Supplier Portal Applicant 1. Organization: City of Corcoran 2. Contact person name: Natalie Davis 3. Contact person title: Planner 4. Contact person phone number: 763-258-4272 5. Contact person email address: ndavis@corcoranmn.gov Request 6. Funds requested (max request of $50,000): 50,000 7. Local match provided: 5,000 8. Please describe any circumstances that should be considered if match is less than suggested level: Not applicable. Context 9. Project title: Corcoran Northeast District Plan 10. Project location: The City of Corcoran’s Northeast District comprised of the following boundaries: North boundary - County Road 117. East boundary – County Road 101. South boundary – County Road 30 corridor. West boundary – aligns with the northwestern MUSA boundary. 11. Brief project description (max of 50 words): Update and expand upon Corcoran’s vision and design standards for new development in the Northeast District Plan established in 2003. Corridor Planning Application [Please keep total response to less than 3 pages] 1. What is the problem or issue you are trying to address with the proposed planning project? The Northeast District is identified as a major gateway into the City of Corcoran. This area also includes significant County transportation corridors and will be greatly impacted by the impending Dayton Parkway Interchange. The area is beginning to experience residential, commercial, and industrial development pressures as the location becomes more attractive to new residents and businesses. At the same time, the existing community seeks to develop the City in a way that preserves the unique, rural character. The current Northeast District plan provides broad groundwork, but it has not been updated since 2003. A more thorough vision with specific standards similar to what the City established for the Southeast District is desired. An updated concept plan with detailed design standards for the Northeast District Corridor of Corcoran will establish: - A clear, consistent definition of urban design objectives that incorporate elements of rural character while informing citizens, developers, and decision-makers. - A tool that designers can use to incorporate general and specific approaches and techniques in their plans that will achieve City design objectives as well as maintaining a high quality, harmonious visual environment. - A basis for uniform and consistent review of development proposals by the City Council and Planning Commission. 2. Describe how Corridor Planning funds would be used. What are the expected tasks and deliverables? What will you do with the deliverables? The Corridor Planning funds will be used to work with consultants and members of the public to create a detailed district plan with design requirements to be implemented through the City Code. This plan will identify design elements, such as: - Landscaping and screening. - Signage and gateways. - Parks and public spaces. - Sites and structures, including: o Permitted materials and architectural styles. o Placement, massing, and height of buildings. o Facades. - Transportation networks, including: o Street types. o Parking and access. o Multi-modal trails. - Stormwater management - Utility installation. - Strategies for sustainability, resiliency, and preservation of natural resources . - Maps, including: o Overall concept plan for the Northeast District. o Existing and proposed infrastructure . o Street hierarchy and fu ture alignments. o Parks and trails. o Walkable destinations map. 3. Describe the community and economic development challenge(s) being addressed through this project. The City of Corcoran is faced with the challenge of retaining the treasured rural character of the community while anticipating significant population growth to meet the housing goals of the larger Twin Cities metropolitan community. Additionally, the Northeast District is becoming commercially attractive due to increased access as transportation improvement projects, such as the Dayton Parkway Interchange, are completed in the corridor. To accommodate this welcomed community and economic development, the c urrent District plan must be expanded upon so it can be used as a tool to maintain a harmonious environment and communicate the community’s expectations to developers and businesses. 4. How does this project reduce disparities in the community? The Southeast District in Corcoran has a detailed plan with design guidelines consisting of roughly 45 pages in the City Code. This serves as a significant tool when working with developers to convey the community’s development goals. The Northeast District plan is currently made up of only two pages and may be too broad to meet the community’s vision. By updating the plan, the City of Corcoran will establish a similar, high-quality baseline that promotes community connectivity, economic opportunity, and visual appeal. 5. What public and private organizations will be involved in project implementation ? How will community stakeholders be engaged? Anticipated public organizations that will be involved in project implementation include: City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, and the Metropolitan Council. Anticipated private organizations include a consultant to be selected for the project. Community stakeholders will be invited to provide feedback through community meetings dedicated to the development of the Northeast District plan. We plan to offer both in -person and virtual meetings to encourage participation. We also would dedicate a webpage on th e City of Corcoran’s website that provides meeting dates, up-to-date planning information, polls to solicit feedback, and contact information for stakeholders to submit additional feedback. 6. Describe how this project fits within your community and organization’s goals, priorities and/or long-range plans? Attach supporting documentation as applicable (i.e. relevant comprehensive plan sections, letters of support, previous work done in relation to proposed project). Corcoran’s City Council and staff identified an update to the Northeast District Plan and Guidelines as a priority for 2021. The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the Northeast District as an area poised to create economic opportunity and housing availability. Ongoing reviews and updates of site and building design standards are identified as an implementation action in order to ensure high -quality residential, commercial, and industrial development throughout the community. Additionally, the development design standards for pu blic parks, trails, and open spaces are also identified as an implementation action to meet the City’s Parks and Trails goals. Work that has already been completed in relation to this proposed project include the plan established for the Southeast District and the existing Northeast District plan adopted in the City Code. The Comprehensive Plan is a valuable tool to guide the development of land in the City as long as the visions, goals and policies called out in the Plan are implemented. The purpose of this Implementation chapter is to identify the specific strategies and action items that the City will undertake, over the course of several years, to ensure that the programs and policies established in the Plan are reflected in the decisions of the City. Official controls, such as land use and zoning regulations, subdivision regulations, and the zoning map, are required by State law to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. These controls represent the rules and regulations that govern City decisions related to growth and development.Most chapters of the Comprehensive Plan identify implementation items. Those chapter-specific items are the detailed policies and programs that are proposed to carry out the goals and objectives of the individual chapters. The purpose of this Implementation chapter is to consolidate, in a single chapter, the collected implementation statements identified throughout the Plan for ease of future reference. These action items will happen at different times throughout the City’s growth and are identified as follows: near-term (0-3 years), mid-term (4-7 years), long- term (8-10+ years), and ongoing (regular basis). Updates to these official controls are included in the following tables. TABLE 11-1: LAND USENo. Description Timing1Amend the official zoning map to be consistent with the land use designations of the 2040 Land Use Map.Near-term/ Ongoing2Prepare and adopt a Growth Management Policy consistent with the Metropolitan Council approved forecasts for sewered and unsewered growth. The plan will utilize a rolling average over five year increments so that a lower level of development can occur in some years and a higher level in other years, provided that the average annual residential permits does not exceed 230 units/year on average. If growth exceeds this rate, the City will coordinate with Metropolitan Council staff to discuss whether or not a forecast change or amendment is needed.Near-term3Review and update residential zoning districts and requirements and subdivision regulations as needed to ensure that the densities envisioned in the Plan can be achieved. Near-term/ Ongoing4Continue to review and update site and building design standards as needed to ensure high-quality residential, commercial, and industrial development in the community.Near-term/ Ongoing5Update Open Space and Preservation Plat Ordinance to support clustering, future connection to sewer, and increased level of natural resource protection with incentives consistent with the flexible residential guidelines and City goals. Near-term6Review and update zoning districts with associated uses and all site and design requirements.Near-term7Review and update the zoning and subdivision ordinances as needed to reduce impediments to affordable housing. Near-term8Encourage use of innovative development concepts where appropriate, such as mixed use development and cluster housing to provide life-cycle housing opportunities, minimize the need for automobiles, protect natural resources and maintain open space.Near-term/ Ongoing9Update the Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines as needed to reflect the policy changes in the current 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Near-term10Review and consider updates to ordinance standards that preserve rural character, including preservation of natural areas and agriculture, open spaces, and large lots with low density, especially in the non-MUSA area. Near-termTABLE 11-2: HOUSINGNo. Description Timing1Develop policy to allow the creative use of site planning or PUDs that provide flexibility for development containing affordable housing, such as a reduction in lot size, setbacks, street width floor area and parking requirements. Near-term/ Mid-term2Explore the suitabilit of various housing finance options and the housing needs they are meant to address.Short-term3Consider developing housing maintenance and rental housing licensing ordinances to maintain existing housing stock.Mid-term4Consider developing and promoting programs that encourage maintenance of existing housing, including neighborhood outreach programs, City beautification programs, City-wide clean up programs, etc.Mid-term/Long-term5Develop a policy stating the housing finance tools the City will use and what types of housing need the tools will be used to support.Long-termTABLE 11-3: ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESSNo. Description Timing1Continue to participate in the I-94 Chamber of Commerce and explore other organizations which promote and attract local business. Near-term/ Ongoing2Support efforts to retain existing businesses and facilitate growth, including reviewing and updating zoning ordinances as appropriate and making business visits.Near-term/ Ongoing3Consider reactivating an Economic Development Authority. Near-term/ Mid-term4 Complete Market Studies as needed. Ongoing147 TABLE 11-4: PARKS AND TRAILSNo. Description Timing1Park dedication fees will be reviewed annually to ensure the plan is implemented economically and effectively and updated as needed. Near-term/ Ongoing2The City will identify land acquisition and protection strategies to assemble the parks, trails, and open space system. Near-term/ Ongoing3Develop and routinely review and update standards for design and construction of public parks, trails and open space areas in the City. The City will apply best practices in mapping dedicated properties and researching and designing facilities. Near-term/ Ongoing4Develop a policy to establish priorities for use of park dedication funds to achieve its Parks and Trails goals. Near-term 5Review and update as needed, the park and trail dedication requirements to ensure appropriate amount of dedication for developing parks and trails. Near-term/ Ongoing6Work cooperatively with other communities in Northwest Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, Minnesota DNR, local landowners and others to implement this plan and make the most of available resources. The City will actively seek grant funding for land acquisition. Near-term/ OngoingTABLE 11-5: TRANSPORTATIONNo. Description Timing1Support the Brockton Interchange project and other mass transportation projects that will benefit Corcoran. Near-term/ Ongoing2Advocate for additional resources for transportation improvementsNear-term/ Ongoing3Require public right of way dedication where deemed necessary on all newly platted lots, including right of way for future road and trail extensions for interconnectivity. Near-term/ Ongoing4 Develop a Right of Way Maintenance Policy. Near-term5Continue to participate and monitor transportation activities by adjacent jurisdictions, Hennepin County, and the State.Near-term/ Ongoing6Develop and execute a plan to analyze, prioritize, and improve gravel roads in Corcoran.Near-term/ OngoingTABLE 11-6: WASTEWATERNo. Description Timing1 Develop a Wastewater Maintenance Plan. Near-term2Review and update ordinances as needed to be consistent with the City’s current ISTS responsibilities.Near-term/ OngoingTABLE 11-7: SURFACE WATERNo. Description Timing1Connect sanitary sewer at Maple Hill Estates to a regional treatment system. Near-term2Continue inspecting BMPs in accordance with the City’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Ongoing3Review and update wetland and shoreland ordinances as needed for consistency with watershed rules and other regulations. Near-term/ Ongoing4Apply the Commission’s strict development standards, to help improve water quality in Rush Creek and elsewhere. Near-term5 Adopt a manure management ordinance. Near-term6Implement one or more recommendations from the Rush Creek Headwaters Sub-watershed Assessment. Near-term7Continue septic system education and work with Hennepin County on compliance. Near-term/ Ongoing8Explore a stormwater pond retrofit in the existing commercial/ industrial area located at County Road 116 and County Road 10. Near-term/ Mid-term9Work with the Commission and other cities on potential wetland improvements in Corcoran. Near-term/ Mid-termTABLE 11-8: WATER SUPPLYNo. Description Timing1Implement notification system to inform customers when water availability conditions change. Near-term2Revise City ordinance/codes to allow water reuse options.Near-term3Conduct water conservation education and outreach. Near-term/ Mid-termTABLE 11-9: RESILIENCENo. Description Timing1Limit development in floodplain and shoreland areas. Near-term2Continue to allow solar energy production as an accessory use.Near-term/ Ongoing3Review and develop policies that incentivize high quality stormwater managementNear-term/ Mid-term4Develop policies and ordinances that encourage plant diversity and pollinator-friendly landscapes on private and public land as well as lawn maintenance and open space ordinances to ensure that pollinator friendly landscapes are not prohibited or overly restricted.Near-term/ Mid-term5 Establish and enforce water quality standardsNear-term/ Mid-term6Develop policies to encourage preservation of agricultural lands and activities in rural areas.Mid-term148 APPENDIX A (Design Guidelines) Page A-12 March 17, 2021 District Design Guidelines Descriptions and Recommendations for District Specific Design Standards District Plan follows: NORTHEAST DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES At one of the major entrances to the City of Corcoran, the Northeast District Plan establishes a gateway to the community that reflects the City’s rural character. The plan offers opportunities for expanded tax base, jobs and services by taking advantage of Maple Grove’s nearby higher density development. The primary entry into the Northeast District is County Road 30, where a mixed-use PUD (planned unit development) will combine a mix of low and medium density residential with mixed-use commercial, including neighborhood retail, service retail, commercial and office uses. The edge of the district along County Road 101 is planned primarily for high quality business parks, with some destination commercial or retail uses closer to the County Road 30 intersection. General Site Development x The commercial area along County Road 101 should be designed as high quality business parks, with appropriate office, commercial and light industrial uses. x Retail uses should be limited to the commercial area indicated near the County Road 101 and 30 intersection or included within the County Road 30 mixed-use PUD area. x Within the PUD, residential development should provide for life-cycle housing for empty nesters, retirees, and first-time home buyers with a range of housing types (condominiums, townhouses, and single-family attached) and densities. Streets, Trails, Parks and Public Amenities x County Road 30 is a major entry point into the City of Corcoran, which warrants a unique design treatment as it meets County Road 101; this intersection should be developed as a “gateway” with significant landscaped open space and appropriate entry elements; the design should express the unique character of Corcoran. x County Road 30 from County Road 116 to County Road 101 should be developed as a green corridor with landscaped setback, center boulevard and other enhancements that will express a sense of entry while maintaining an open, rural road character. x Enhancements at the intersection of County Roads 116 and 30 should be designed similar to major County Road 116 intersections in the downtown and southeast district. APPENDIX A (Design Guidelines) Page A-13 March 17, 2021 x The County Road 116 rural greenway should continue north through this district, with trail connections to new civic or community spaces as well as retail or destination uses within the PUD. x Mixed commercial-retail within the PUD should be designed around public or common areas that are linked by trails or sidewalks. The design should also include sidewalks and trails to connect neighborhood retail and public spaces to the adjacent residential neighborhoods. x Mixed-use and new residential development within the PUD should include a designated neighborhood park in addition to natural open space (woods, wetlands, meadows, etc.). x The planned extension of County Road 117 to County Road101 should be planned and designed in a way that is sensitive to existing residential uses in that area. Direct access for new developments should be limited on County Roads 101, 116 and 30. Future plans for access on these roads should balance traffic demand and future development. Appendix B Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines Adopted April 25, 2019 | 3 Southeast District Overview | 5 Purpose Application Southeast District Vision Sites and Structures Southeast District Principles | 7 Landscaping and Screening Signage and Gateways Parks, Trails and Public Space Healthy Communities | 25 Town Center | 27 Overview Buildings - Placement, Massing and Height Screening and Loading Facades Streets Parking and Access Landscaping and Screening Community Center Test Table of Contents Downtown Core | 39 Overview Vision Site Development Buildings - Placement, Massing and Height Streetscape Parking Public Art Signage Plazas Implementation | 45 Southeast District Boundary Town Center Downtown Core Existing Downtown Floodplain Watercourse Maple/Basswood Disturbed Woodland Savanna/Pasture Wet Prairie Emergent Shrub Floodplain Forest NP / Neighborhood Park OSP / Nature Park ASA / Athletic Search Area Golf Course On Road Trail Off Road Trail Potential Water Tower Open Water Potential Natural Gas Pipeline Easement Trail City of Corcoran Proposed Trails Parks Utilities Wetland Communities Upland Plant Communities Important Features LEGEND District Boundaries * Southeast District Analysis Map. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes planned future infrastructure improvements in the district including rerouting County Road 10 to provide safer access points and improving County Road 10 intersections. The existing trail system will be supplemented by a network of on- and off-road trails. Natural assets including wetlands, creeks and uplands, woodlands and savannah provide a framework and inspiration for development aesthetics. A new water tower is planned within the district. The general location is shown on WKHPDSEXWWKH¿QDOORFDWLRQZLOOEHGHWHUPLQHGDVGHYHORSPHQWRFFXUV0XQLFLSDO sanitary sewer and water are also in place to serve the future Town Center. 01 Overview | 5 In 2015, the City of Corcoran, in partnership with Hennepin County, began work to update the existing design guidelines and master plan for the Southeast District. The Corcoran Southeast 'LVWULFW3ODQDQG'HVLJQ*XLGHOLQHVZHUHPRGL¿HGWRUHÀHFWWKH)XWXUH/DQG8VH3ODQDQG RWKHUFKDQJHVQHHGHGWRLPSOHPHQWWKH&LW\¶V9LVLRQ7KLVXSGDWHZDVGHYHORSHGWRUHÀHFWWKH 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which no longer includes the realignment of County Roads 10 and 50, but does continue to show a partial realignment of County Road 10 onto Meister Road at a future date. The Southeast District is the historic heart of the City. The intersection of County Road 10 and County Road 116 is a historic crossroads and this area is home to the existing city hall, St. Thomas Catholic Church and the existing business park. The Southeast District is also beginning to see the residential development that has long been anticipated with the GHYHORSPHQWRI/HQQDU¶V³5DYLQLD´QHLJKERUKRRGDQG0,+RPHV³%DVV/DNH&URVVLQJ´DQG ³%DVV/DNH&URVVLQJ6RXWK´7KHTown Center (including the Downtown Core) within the 6RXWKHDVW'LVWULFWLVDPL[HGXVHGLVWULFWFRPELQLQJUHWDLORI¿FHDQGVHUYLFHFRPPHUFLDOZLWK a mix of low, medium and higher density residential. The planned development is balanced by extensive open space and natural resources, including two golf courses (Rush Creek & 6KDPURFN /LRQV3DUN&RUFRUDQ&RPPXQLW\3DUNWKH&LW\+DOOSDUNDQGWKH5XVK&UHHN corridor. Purpose The primary purpose of Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines is to set basic parameters, describe preferences and illustrate design intent. These guidelines serve as principles within which creative design can and should occur – there is no one solution, but many options that meet the basic requirements of this document. Application 7KHIRUPDWDQGFRQWHQWDUHVSHFL¿FDOO\WDLORUHGIRUXVHDVDVXSSOHPHQWWRWKH=RQLQJ Ordinance. This master plan provides illustrative guidance for building locations and orientation. Any changes to this approved master plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Council as part of the development application. Southeast District Vision Create a complete transportation network that balances pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular use with mix of residential housing types, retail and an expanded employment base, while PDLQWDLQLQJDFFHVVWRWKHQDWXUDOUHVRXUFHVWKDWGH¿QH&RUFRUDQ¶VTXDOLW\RIOLIH Southeast District Overview Southeast District Objectives 1. The Southeast District has key transportation corridors within the City of Corcoran which provide vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian connections to adjacent communities. 2. The Southeast District is home to Corcoran Community Park. 3. The Southeast District includes a variety of businesses that provide retail and services that support the daily needs of residents. 4. The Southeast District includes D7RZQ&HQWHUZLWKUHWDLORI¿FH housing, public spaces, and employment opportunities. 5. The Southeast District provides life- cycle housing opportunities that are within walking and biking distance of Downtown. 6. The Southeast District provides a concentration of urban housing options, so that the majority of the City can remain rural. 6 | District Principles Southeast District Concept Plan. The Southeast District is the spatial framework for these design standards. The Town Center and Downtown Core are nested within the district each with additional guidance to create the neighborhoods and places envisioned by the community. Commercial 0L[HG8VH High Density Residential Medium Density Residential /RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO Public / Semi-Public Mixed Residential Parks / Open Space Agricultural Preserve Industrial Not to Scale Southeast District Boundary Town Center Downtown Core /DQG8VH&ODVVLÀFDWLRQ Retail Residential Public Agriculture Industrial LEGEND District Boundaries District Principles | 7 02 Southeast District Principles Sites and Structures 7KH6RXWKHDVW'LVWULFWVKRXOGFRQWLQXHWRSURYLGHDPL[RIUHVLGHQWLDOFRPPHUFLDORI¿FHDQG LQGXVWULDOXVHVDVGHVFULEHGLQWKH&RPSUHKHQVLYH3ODQDQG=RQLQJ2UGLQDQFH7KH'HVLJQ *XLGHOLQHVIRUWKHGLVWULFWVKDOOEHWKHVDPHDVWKRVHGHVFULEHGLQWKH=RQLQJ2UGLQDQFHIRUWKH zoning district in which the development is located and these Design Standards will provide an additional layer of standards. New residential development should provide for the full range of life cycle housing, offering choices of housing types at low, medium and higher densities. Within the Southeast District, the combination of site and building design should provide a visual cue that this is a unique place. For single family, twin and townhome structures, architecture styles including: Agrarian Contemporary, Farmhouse, and Arts & Crafts - Prairie are encouraged, as is the use of regional building materials and native plants. Development in this GLVWULFWVKRXOGEHWKRXJKWIXOO\GHVLJQHGWRUHÀHFW&RUFRUDQ¶VUXUDOFKDUDFWHU 8 | District Principles Agrarian Contemporary Agrarian Contemporary style homes rely on simple forms with strong roof lines and inviting front porches. This style is a clean, crisp, more contemporary version of the Agrarian Rural style. Typical style elements include: • Form and Roof • Simple roof design, front to back gable or side to side • 5:12 to 12:12 roof pitches • Overhang eaves • Walls and Windows: • Horizontal or board and batten siding, stucco or a combination • Symmetrical placement and distinct fenestration rhythms • Square, circular or 2:1 proportioned vertical rectangular windows with grid patterns • Details • Porches with simple columns, trim and railings • Minimal door and window trim detailing • Dormers, cupolas, shutters, exposed rafter tails District Principles | 9 Farmhouse Farmhouse style is comfortable and practical. It is a hybrid of elements brought together by regional craftsmen and traditions of the early 20th century. Typical style elements include: • Form and Roof • Two story • Asymmetrical, angular design with tall proportions. • Gable roof • 8:12 or greater roof pitch • Overhang eaves • Wood or asphalt shingled roof • Walls and Windows: • Wood cladding with horizontal, diagonal or vertical layout • Tall rectangular windows with large panes • Details • Decorative braces and brackets • 3ODLQWULPERDUGVDQGVRI¿WV • Corbels and gable trusses • Wrap porches • Geometric patterns • Embellished porch railings 10 | District Principles Arts & Crafts - Prairie 3UDLULH6W\OHLVWUXO\$PHULFDQGHULYHGE\)UDQN/OR\G:ULJKWDQG/RXLV Sullivan. Typical style elements include: • Form and Roof • /RZSLWFKHGURRIZLWKZLGHRYHUKDQJLQJHDYHV • Massive square porch supports • Two stories with one story porches or wings • *DEOHURRIHGJHVÀDWWHQHG • 3-1/2:12 or greater roof pitch • Hipped roof • Walls and Windows: • Horizontal windows, sometimes wrapping around corners • Tall casement windows • Geometric patterns of small-pane windows • Details • Detail emphasizing horizontal lines • Contrasting wood trim • Horizontal patterns in wall materials • Window boxes • Ornamentation at the door or cornice line • Flattened pedestal urns District Principles | 11 Street Hierarchy 2QHVLJQL¿FDQWGHYHORSPHQWFRQVLGHUDWLRQLQWKLVGLVWULFWLVLQFUHDVLQJWKHLQWHQVLW\RIXVH without overloading the existing transportation network. Current plans will create safer, better PDQDJHGWUDI¿FÀRZDQGFRUUHFWVHYHUDOGLI¿FXOWLQWHUVHFWLRQV&RXQW\5RDGZLOOFRQWLQXH to be the central route through the Southeast District, but improvements are planned for where County Road 116 passes through the Town Center. As improvements are made to this road, emphasis should be placed on creating a pedestrian-friendly environment. Enhancements to WUDI¿FFRQWUROVSHGHVWULDQFRQQHFWLRQVOLJKWLQJJDWHZD\HOHPHQWVDQGODQGVFDSLQJDWNH\ intersections will serve that purpose. The County Road 116 corridor should be designed with green boulevards on both sides, with particular attention given to the east side of the road where a linear park with off-road trail is planned. Where County Road 116 passes through the Town Center, this road should shift to the east to allow for a center landscaped boulevard and other enhancements that will express a sense of 7RZQ&HQWHULGHQWLW\7KHLQWHUVHFWLRQVRI&RXQW\5RDGDQG/DUNLQ5RDGDQG&RXQW\5RDG 116 and City Hall Drive (proposed new road just south of City Hall) mark the entry points into this area, and the start of the proposed boulevard. The design of these intersections should EDODQFHWKHQHHGVRIWUDI¿FDQGSHGHVWULDQV7KH&LW\ZLOOFRQWLQXHWRZRUNZLWK+HQQHSLQ County to ensure future improvements are consistent with City’s vision as well as the County policy related to Complete Streets. As part of this vision, the City will look for opportunities to provide grade-separated pedestrian crossings in addition to the at-grade crossings. The existing road network should be maintained as a continuous network, with new connections where needed. Cul-de-sacs are strongly discouraged in the Town Center. Cul-de-sacs should be avoided throughout the Southeast District in favor of connecting streets that will facilitate resilient multi-modal routes within the district. The Southeast District has six main types of streets which are described and illustrated on the IROORZLQJSDJHV(DFKVHUYHVDVSHFL¿FIXQFWLRQWRZDUGWKHFUHDWLRQRIDZHOOFRQQHFWHGDQG economically viable Southeast District. Street Connectivity. A connected network of streets provides system resiliency and greater capacity with the same lane miles. Top: Connected Network is preferred. Bottom: Sparse Hierarchy with cul-de-sacs is not desirable. X 12 | District Principles Street typology in this appendix does not take the place of the standards found in the Corcoran Comprehensive Plan and Subdivision Ordinance, but is intended to supplement that information with a more detailed description of the street design in this district. These standards will be applied for development in the Town Center, but the City may require developments in other areas of the Southeast District to follow the standards in the Engineering Design Standards. The developer shall be responsible for construction of all streetscape improvements along adjacent streets. These improvements include all hardscape, landscape and site amenities, such as trails, sidewalks, benches, bike racks, street trees and plantings. Frontage (space between the back of curb and the right-of-way line) can be divided into two zones: the throughway and pedestrian buffer. Throughway is foremost the accessible route for pedestrians. Once the needs for ADA accessibility are met, the remaining width is based on the needs of the frontage. An urban frontage with shopping and many pedestrians requires a wider throughway to allow for window shopping, couples walking side-by- side, strollers and the like. Pedestrian Buffer is the space between the throughway and the back of curb. It will also vary in width depending on the needs of the adjacent land uses. In active urban areas, the pedestrian buffer includes patio tables, pedestrian lighting, street trees, planters and all the amenities that support the streetscape character. In single family residential neighborhoods, the pedestrian buffer is generally tree lined with turf or plantings tended by residents. Frontage Prototype. The frontage is a subset of each street section. ,QKLJKWUDI¿FDUHDVOLNH0DLQ6WUHHWWKHIURQWDJHLVZLGHIXOO\SDYHGDQG programmed to support the wide range of retail, service and residential activities occurring on adjacent properties. throughway frontagestreet parking lane pedestrian buffer building type & setback varies by zoning district right-of-way right-of-way throughway frontagestreet pedestrian buffer building type & setback varies by zoning district In low density residential areas, the frontage is narrow and supports the needs of a quiet neighborhood. A sidewalk and turf boulevard with regularly spaced overstory DQGWDOORUQDPHQWDOWUHHVLVVXI¿FLHQW District Principles | 13 Type ROW Width County Road 120 feet Parkway Street 72 feet Main Street (Downtown Core) 70 feet Connector Street 60 feet /RFDO6WUHHW 50 feet Southeast District Street Types Map. Not To Scale County Road, Mid-Block (top), Corner/Intersection (bottom). The County Road street type has a 120-foot wide standard right-of-way. County Engineering standards DSSO\DQGWKURXJKFXUUHQWWUDI¿FDQGIXWXUHGHPDQGDQDO\VLVWKHroadway section may include turn lanes, two-lane or four lane sections and required clear zones for safety. On CR 116 within the Town Center, gateway intersections and planted medians reinforce the road’s role to support the Downtown Core. At gateway corners along CR 116, pedestrian amenities should reinforce the gateway character and include high visibility safety features including crosswalks with crossing countdowns lights, center refuge medians, wide pedestrian level pavements and enhanced lighting. On road ELNHODQHVH[LVWRQ&5WRGD\DQG¿WZLWKLQWKHIXWXUHVHFWLRQNot all county roads are planned to include on-road bike lanes Enhanced Pedestrian Node. (Right) Major crossings of County Roads should have enhanced pedestrian nodes including extra wide concrete landings upon which to wait safely, detectable warnings, and clear crosswalk markings. This example connects a City sidewalk to a Three Rivers Park System trail and so is further HQKDQFHGZLWKEHQFKHVOLWWHUUHFHSWDFOHVZD\¿QGLQJGHFRUDWLYHfencing, and stone pedestals for future art installation.70’ /LQHDU3DUNEASTWESTEASTWEST64’ /LQHDU3DUN120’ Right of Way120’ Right of Way48’Planting Strip5’ Bike5’ Bike5’ Bike5’ Bike11’ 'ULYH/DQH12’ 'ULYH/DQH20’ Planting Strip24’ Planting Strip¶0XOWL8VHTrailEnhanced Pedestrian Node at CrossingEnhanced Pedestrian Node at Crossing12’ 'ULYH/DQH12’ 'ULYH/DQH32’ Planting Strip12’ 'ULYH/DQH9’ Planting Strip¶0XOWL8VHTrail10’ Planting Strip District Principles | 15 8-feetparking8-feet zero tb k Parkway Street. This tree lined street has a 72-foot wide right-of-way and a center median with trees. The median may have turf or perennials and shrubs depending on the surrounding context. Parkways at the entrance to a neighborhood or district are logical places for upgrading the median plantings to perennials and shrubs with trees. In special cases, the median may be depressed and function as a stormwater amenity. In this case, upgraded plantings are advised. The City Engineer may reduce or eliminate on-street parking for this street type outside the Town Center depending on the surrounding context. 6’ Sidewalk 6’ Sidewalk 6’ Planting Strip 6’ Planting Strip 8’ Parking /DQH 8’ Parking /DQH 11’ 'ULYH/DQH 10’ Planting Strip 11’ 'ULYH/DQH Main Street is characterized by a 70-foot right-of-way width. Buildings should have a zero setback. The pedestrian realm is an urban streetscape with space for window shopping, furnishings, pedestrian level lighting, overstory trees and planters. 16’ Pedestrian Realm 16’ Pedestrian Realm 8’ Parking /DQH 8’ Parking /DQH 3DUNLQJ/DQH =HUR6HWEDFN8 Ft 8 Ft 11’ 'ULYH/DQH 11’ 'ULYH/DQH Main Street Pedestrian Realm. The pedestrian realm on Main Street is 16- feet wide from back of curb to building face. Amenities supportive of the building uses are encouraged including: patio seating, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, and planter pots with seasonal displays. Infrastructure like pedestrian level lighting, street trees in landscaped boulevards are also appropriate. 16 | District Principles Connector Street. The Connector Street has a 60-foot right-of-way and prioritizes movement across the community. Setbacks vary by district, but the frontage is consistently a sidewalk in the throughway and a turf boulevard with regularly spaced overstory and tall ornamental trees. Local Street. 7KH/RFDO6WUHHWKDVDIRRWULJKWRIZD\ZLWKSDUNLQJRQRQH side and serves the movement needs of neighborhood residents. Setbacks vary by district, but the frontage is consistently a sidewalk in the throughway and a turf boulevard with regularly spaced overstory and tall ornamental trees. The drive lane near the curb is slightly wider to accommodate vehicular buffer space. 5’ Sidewalk 5’ Sidewalk 5’ Sidewalk 5’ Sidewalk 6’ 6’ 6’ 6’ 8’ Parking /DQH 8’ Parking /DQH 7’ Parking /DQH 11’ 'ULYH/DQH 11’ 'ULYH/DQH 11’ 'ULYH/DQH 10’ 'ULYH/DQH District Principles | 17 This page left intentionally blank 18 | District Principles Landscaping and Screening Site design and landscaping should be designed to work with the existing topography of the area, preserving the rolling hills, Rush Creek natural resources corridor, woods and wetlands, and natural viewsheds and corridors. /DQGVFDSHVFUHHQVZLWKEHUPVKHGJHURZVDQGDYDULHW\RIGHFLGXRXVDQGFRQLIHURXVQDWLYH trees and shrubs should be incorporated to minimize undesirable views from the public realm. Signage and Gateways Signage should be designed as an integral part of the building and site design and shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 84 of the City Code. The City will work with developers to: • Include gateway signage at key intersections along County Road 116 and the Town Center. • Incorporate landscaping, lighting and hardscape to anchor the gateway’s visual presence.Gateways. City Center Drive, Main Street and /DUNLQ5RDGSULPDU\DQGVHFRQGDU\HQWUDQFHVWR the Town Center, should have gateway amenities. landscaping, monument signage and lighting. Main Street Parkway South Parkway North District Principles | 19 Stormwater Management Water features and drainage systems are essential components of development in the Southeast District. A mix of ponds, fountains and other water elements provide focal amenities and year round activities within the framework of an environmentally responsible, visually pleasing strategy to manage stormwater. A series of regional stormwater ponds is envisioned, but each site has a responsibility to utilize best management practices (BMP) to pretreat UXQRIIUHGXFHHURVLRQDQGHQFRXUDJHLQ¿OWUDWLRQLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWK&LW\DQG(OP&UHHN Watershed Management Commission standards. Water and landscape should be utilized within multipurpose areas that accommodate both active and passive recreational use – the following examples illustrate only a few of many possibilities: 1. Pervious pavements, underground storage and other creative techniques should be used to BMP standards, particularly in the Town Center where more density is expected. 2. Green architecture, expressed through green roofs, gray water recycling and other techniques should be included to reduce the impact of new development on stormwater systems 3. :DWHUIHDWXUHGHVLJQVKRXOGLQFOXGHERWKIRUPDOHOHPHQWV VXFKDVUHÀHFWLQJSRROV or fountains) and natural/informal forms (such as ponds or fountains) and should explore creative ways to integrate wet landscapes with active, urban spaces. Stormwater Management. Stormwater management infrastructure can take a variety of forms. Master planning regional stormwater is the PRVWHI¿FLHQWXVHRIODQG2WKHURSWLRQVLQFOXGHD hard working below ground system that is topped by a parking lot, streetscape or even a planted swale. These examples of stormwater infrastructure are from various locations around the Twin Cities metro area (top left to bottom right) planted swale within DSDUNLQJORWLQ¿OWUDWLRQV\VWHPXQGHUDSDUNLQJORW VWUXFWXUDOFHOOVWUHHWVFDSHV\VWHPLQ¿OWUDWLRQWUHQFK within a county road median. 20 | District Principles Southeast District Parks Within the Town Center, the linear park along County Road 116, the Town Square, and two small neighborhood playgrounds serve residents and visitors. $/LQHDU3DUN B. Town Square C. Neighborhood Park D. Neighborhood Park E. Corcoran Community Park F. City Park near City Hall *:LOGÀRZHU3DUN Existing Parks Proposed Parks A C E G B F D District Principles | 21 Parks, Trails and Public Space The linear park (A) should continue north and south through the town center on the East side of County Road 116, with trail connections to new civic and community spaces and uses. Safe, convenient pedestrian crossings are a priority within the entire Southeast District. New public spaces, parks, and common greens or open space should be linked to other community parks and open space with trail connections to the existing and proposed City parks and trail system. The only active park currently in the Southeast District is Corcoran Community Park (E). The park will likely change over time as the former Rockford school property is developed and road connections LQWKLVDUHDDUHPRGL¿HGEXWWKLVZLOOFRQWLQXHWREHDQLPSRUWDQWSDUN in the City system and priority should be given to ensuring strong bike and pedestrian connections to this park and other planned parks in the district. A second City park is being developed on the City Hall property (F) and could be expanded to take advantage of the woodland area on the east side of the City Hall property. A new Town Square (B) is planned in the Downtown Core. The Town Square will serve as a social center for the community, suitable for concerts and celebrations, but also as a place to enjoy the scenes of downtown. Picnic tables for lunch, benches for people watching, the Town Square will be a public space to support a bustling downtown. Two small neighborhood parks (C & D) are also planned in and near the Town Center, one each to the north and south of the Downtown Core. These parks will include walking trails and playgrounds. The neighborhood park on the north is nestled in an existing woodland, and will provide interesting walking trails, connecting to City Hall, ample shade, and an opportunity for an exercise circuit (Par Course) for the adjacent senior housing development. The southern neighborhood park is perched on a terrace above the wetland and offers great views across the landscape. A playground and trails through the wetland prairie will offer birdwatching and contemplation. All three parks will be developed when the adjacent property is platted. Another park is proposed in the Southeast District near Blue Bonnet Drive and in the Northwest corner of the Ravinia development. :LOGÀRZHU3DUN * ZDVUHFHQWO\GHYHORSHGLQWKH5DYLQLD development. Par Course Station Woodland Playground Wetland Overlook 22 | District Principles Public green space, within close proximity to homes and businesses, is a vital part of a healthy community. A Town Square is meant to serve as a community gathering place for celebrations throughout the seasons. This example from Burnsville is a modern destination surrounded by civic, retail and residential uses. Temporary winter uses like a small ice rink could double the value of a bandshell or picnic pavilion when considered as a warming house in the cold season. Olympic Plaza in Whistler below creates an irregular shaped rink for casual and family use. District Principles | 23 This page left intentionally blank 24 | Healthy Communities Walkable Destinations Map. $¿YHRUWHQ minute walk, 1/4 or 1/2 mile radius, is one common way to consider walkability. Within the Southeast District, there are intended to be a high number of parks, retail uses and residential units within that walkable range. Existing Parks Proposed Parks Not To Scale Healthy Communities | 25 03 Healthy Communities While developing these guidelines, the City of Corcoran was mindful of how community design impacts the health of the people who live, work, play, learn and worship in the city. Communities around the country are increasingly aware of the impact that land-use and transportation have on people’s ability to be active and access healthy food. We also know that a lack of physical activity, combined with diet, is one of the leading factors behind the increase in chronic diseases, such as heart disease and type II diabetes. Sidewalks, trails, bike lanes and parks all provide opportunities for people to be physically active, both recreationally and by incorporating activity into their daily routines. Mixed-use and higher density developments also encourage people to be active by making it easier to bike and walk to destinations rather than driving. When developing the plan and design guidelines for the Southeast District (including the Town Center and the Downtown Core), we looked at the following considerations: • An integrated transportation network: Streets connecting residential areas to the Downtown Core are safe, appealing and accessible to people walking and biking, as well as people driving motor vehicles. A combination of off-road and on-street bike and pedestrian facilities are included to give people safe and convenient options for active transportation. • Accessible destinations and inviting design: Housing, retail and other destinations are located in or near the downtown to invite walking by creating pleasant and safe routes. • Green space: A new Town Square and neighborhood park create additional opportunities for physical activity and promotes social connectedness. 26 | Town Center 0L[HG8VH Town Homes Apartments Single Family Town Center Town Center Concept Plan /HJHQG Downtown Core Gateway Nodes 7979t79t79t79t79t979t979t79t7979t7999t9t99t9t9thPhPhPPh Ph Ph Ph Ph Ph PPlaclacllaclaclaclaclaclaclaclacclacaaclacacaaacaceeeeeeeeeeeeeee 7797979t79t79797977979t9977797979799h AhAh Ah AhAh Ah Ah Ahh Ah AAAvenvenvenvenvenvenvenvenvenvvvenveneeneeeueueueueueueueueeuueeeueueeueeeeTowTowTowTowTowTowTTowToTowTowTToTowToTToToToTowTowTowTTowowTTTTTTTTTToTwwn n nnn nnnnn nnn nnnnnnnn nnnnn nnnn CCCCCCCCCeCeCenCenCCeCCCeenenCCCCeenenenCCCeCCeCCCennCCCCCttteteterterttttererttttertt ParParParParPaPaParParParPParParParPaParParParParParParParPaParParParParPaParPaPaParaaaParParParPaaPPP kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk SouSouSSououSououoSououSououououSSouououSouSoouSouSSSuuuuth ththhhthhhhth thhhth hhttttttht ParPararararrrrrrrrrrrrrrararrrrrrkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk NorNorNorNorNorNorNoNorNorNorNorNorNoNorNorNorNoNoNorNNNoorrNorNNoNororNoNNNoNoorNorNoroNorNrNorNorNoNooorooooooNoNNNNNNNoNoooorNNNNothth th ththththth th th ththththththhthhthhththhhhthhttthhttththt ParParParaParParParParParParParParPararParParPaParPParPaPPaPParPaPPPPaPPaPPPaPPaPPkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk iiiMiMiMMMMMiMMiMaMaiMMaMaiMaiMaiMaiMaiMaiMaiMaiMaiMaMaiaiMMiMaaMaMaMaiii SSnSSSSSSSSSSn SnSn Sn Sn SnSSnnnnSnSSSSn Snn Sn Sttretttrettttttretretrettretretreetretretretretretretretretrere tetttetttteteteteteteteeeteteeetteteeteetet M a i M a i M a i M a i M a M a i M a i M a i MM a i MM a M a i M a i M a i M a i M a M a i M a i MM a i M a i M a i MM a M a i M a i MM a i M a i M a i M a M a i M a i MMMMMM a i M an S n S n S n S n S n S n SSn S n S n S nnn S nn S n S n S n S n S n S n SSSn S n SSn S n SSSSSSSSSStretretretretretretretrettrettretretrtrtretrettttrtretretretrettretrettrtretretrtreretretretretretrerreeeteteteteteteettettetetetteteteetetetetetetetetetettetettttt 76t76t76t76t7676t76t76t76t76t76t76t76t76t76t76t77776tt776t7776776hh Ah AhAh Ah AAh AhAh AhAhAhAhAAhAhAh Ah Ah Ah AAh AhAAh Ahvennvenvenenvennvenvenvennnnnvenennueueueueeeueeeueeueeueeueueeueeeeueeeee FloFloloodpodpplailailainnn WetWetWetWetWetWetWetWetWetWeWWWetW lanlanlanlanlaanldsdsdsdsddd LarLLLaarLarLLarLaLarLarLLLaarLararararLLaLLaLarLaraarararLrrkkinkinkkiiiikinkikikinkkkinkikikinkikiikinnkkkinkkikikinkiinkinkiinnkki RRRRRoRRoRoRoRoRRRRoRoRoRRoRRoooRRRRRoRooo dddddddddddadddddadadadadadadadddaa tCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCittCitCitCitCitCitCitCtCiCitCCCitCitCCCCCCCCCCCitittttty Cy Cy Cy Cy Cy Cy CyCy CyCyCyCyCy CyCy Cy CyCy Cy CyCyCyyCyCyy Cy Cyyyy Cy yy Cy Cy y y CyyCy CCyCCCCCCCCCCentententententententententententenententententententeeneenteentententententeenteeentntntnntntntnntnntnntntntnnntttttttttereeerer er er erer eerer erereer eeereeerer eereer er eer ereeerer eereeererrrrrrrrDriDriDriDriDriDriDriDDriDriDrDriDDrDriDrDriDrDriDriDriDriDriDriDDriDDDriDDDrDriririririvevevevevevevevevevevevevevevvevevevveveveveveveveveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeCCitCitCiCitCitCCCCCitCitCitCitCCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCitCCitCitCCCitCitCCitCitCitCiCCCitCitCitCCitCiCCiCitCitCitCiitiiiitttttyyyy Cy Cy Cy Cy Cy CyCyy Cy Cy Cy Cy Cy Cyyy Cy CyCy Cy Cy CyCy Cy Cy CyCyy Cy Cy CyCy CyyCyCy Cy CyyyCyy Cyy CyyCCCCCCCentententententenententenentententententententententententenenteententtentententententnnntntnntntntntntnttttter er er er ererereer ereeerereeeereereereereeeereeeeeereererererrrrDriDriDriDriDriDriDriDriDrDrDriDriDriDrirDriDriDriDrDriDriDrirDriDriDrDrDriDriDDrDriDririDrDriDriDriDrririiiiiiiiiivevevevevevevevevevevevevevevevevevevevevevevevvevevevveveveeeeeeeeeeeeeeCouCouCouCouCouCouCouououCouCouCouCouCououCouCouCouCouCouououCououCouCouCouCouCouuuCouuCouuuCouuCouCouCoCoCoCoCCCntytyntyntytytytyntyntyntyntytyntyntyntyntyntytyntyntyntyntyntyyntytytytytyntytytytytytyntytyttnnRoRoRoRoRoRooRoRoRoooRoRoRooRoooRoRooRoooooRoooooooRoRoRRRRRRad adadadadadaddad adadadadadadadddadadaddddadadaddadddddddddadaa11611611611611611611611161161161611611611616116116161161161166116161611666611611611611611611611611616161111111111CouCouCouCouCouCouCouCCouCouCouCouCouCouCoCCouoCouCouCooouuuuuntyntyntyntyntyntyntyntynty yntyntyntyntyntyntynty tynty tnnty yyyyyRoRoRoRoRRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRRoRoRRRRoRoooad ad ad adad adadad ad ad ad ad adddaadaaaddd10101010101010101010101001000100OakOakOakOakOakOakOakOakOakOakOakOakOakOOakOakOakOakOakOakOakOOakOakOOakOakOOakOakOakOakOOOakOakOOOakOakOakOakOakOakOOOOOakOOaOakakkkkkLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLLLaLLaLaLLaLaLaLaLaLLaLaLaLaLaLaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanenenenenenenenenenennenenenenenenenenennnenennenenenennennnneeeeeeeeeeMulMulMuMulMulMuMulMulMlMMlMuMulMlMMlMMuMMMulMulMMuMMMulMMMullberberberberberbbbberberbbberbbbbbberberberbbbbbbbbebbbbbeeyyry ry ry ry ry ry ry ry yyry rryyyrrryry yyryry yyyyyLanLanLanLanLanLanLLLLanLLanLLLLaLLLLLLLLeeeeeeeLarLarLLarLarLLarLarLLLLLLLLLarLararch chchchchhhhhchchhhchhhhhchhchhhhhhhhLanLanLanLLanLanLanLLLanLLanLLLanLLLLaLLLLaneeeeeeeeMaple Hill RoadGood Sheperd Church City Hall Not To Scale Town Center | 27 04 Town Center Overview The Town Center is the walkable traditional neighborhood supporting the Downtown Core. The Town Center is bound by City Hall on the north, County Road 10 on the south, County Road 116 on the west and Maple Hill Road on the east. The Town Center is intended to support the Downtown Core through walkable blocks, a variety of housing types and densities, and a XQL¿HGSXEOLFUHDOPDHVWKHWLF7KH'RZQWRZQ&RUHLVDVXEVHWRIWKH7RZQ&HQWHUDQGVKDOO have additional design guidelines. All development within the Southeast District will be based on an integrated transportation network that connects residential neighborhoods with the existing business park on the west side of County Road 116 and the Downtown Core on the east side of County Road 116. A combination of off-road and on-street bike and pedestrian facilities are included to give residents and visitors safe and convenient options for active transportation as an option to driving. Special emphasis will be placed on providing accessible destinations and inviting design. Housing, retail and other destinations are located in or near the Downtown Core to invite walking by creating pleasant and safe routes within the Town Center. A Town Square, City Hall Park and two small Neighborhood Parks create additional opportunities for physical activity and social connectedness. 8VHVZLWKLQWKH7RZQ&HQWHULQFOXGH PL[HGXVHSXEOLFVHPLSXEOLFDQGPL[HGUHVLGHQWLDO7KH 7RZQ&HQWHUVKDOOEHGHYHORSHGLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGVLQWKH=RQLQJ2UGLQDQFH DQGWKHVHJXLGHOLQHV7KHHQWLUH7RZQ&HQWHULVJXLGHG0L[HG8VHLQWKH&RPSUHKHQVLYH 3ODQ7KLVODQGXVHFDWHJRU\ZRXOGDOORZGHYHORSPHQWLQWKLVDUHDE\3ODQQHG8QLW 'HYHORSPHQW 38' 7KLVGLVWULFWSURYLGHVDYDULHW\RIDQWLFLSDWHGXVHVDQGWKH&LW\GHYHORSHG the Town Center master plan as their preferred vision for the area; however, the City is willing to evaluate other uses provided that the spirit and intent of the Town Center master plan is preserved. Concept Areas Town Center 200 acres Downtown Core 40 acres Use Size (estimated) 0L[HG8VH 440,000 sq. ft. Single Family Residential 150 units Townhomes 170 units Apartment/Condo 500 units Town Square Park 7 acres South Neighborhood Park 1.1 acres North Neighborhood Park 3.0 acres /LQHDU3DUN 9.0 acres Town Center Development Potential: The concept developed for the new Town Center includes the following development potential: 28 | Town Center Buildings - Placement, Massing and Height 7KHDUHDDQGVHWEDFNUHTXLUHPHQWVVKDOOEHDVQRWHGLQWKH=RQLQJ Ordinance for the district in which the property is located, except that additional standards shall be required for the Downtown Core as noted elsewhere in this document. Placement of non-residential and multi-family residential structures should support a higher level of consideration as described in this section. Street Edge Requirement. A consistent street edge must be maintained at the right-of-way line along all street frontages. Street edge elements may consist of the primary building, low masonry walls, fences, landscaping or a combination of all of these elements. Zero Lot Line Buildings are encouraged within the Town Center and particularly in the Downtown Core. Building Frontage. At least 60% of the primary street linear frontage of each lot shall be occupied by a building at the required build-to line. Other portions of a building beyond the 60% may be set back farther than required by the build-to line. In addition, on corner ORWVDPLQLPXPRIWKH¿UVWIHHWRIWKHORWIURQWDJHRQHLWKHUVLGHRI a street intersection must be occupied by buildings set at the build to line. Parking or other space open to the sky is not allowed within this ¿UVWIHHW The build-to line may be met either with an enclosed building or an arcade constructed with a permanent roof of the same materials as the remainder of the building. Height. Multi-story buildings (greater than two stories) built to the maximum heights permitted by zoning are encouraged. Stepping portions of upper stories back from the line of the front façade to provide areas for outdoor terraces and rooftop patios is encouraged. 1HZVLQJOHVWRU\FRPPHUFLDOEXLOGLQJW\SHVZLWKÀDWURRIVVKDOOKDYHD PLQLPXPFRUQLFHKHLJKWRIIHHWWREHWWHUGH¿QHWKHVWUHHW Diagram of building frontage requirements for primary street and corner lot frontage. Reinforcement of the street edge with low walls and landscaping. Town Center | 29 Screening and Loading Ground Mounted Mechanical Equipment shall be fully screened and properly maintained with material similar to or compatible with material used on the main structure. Screened mechanical equipment shall not be located in the front side yard, but may be located at the side or rear yard. Trash and Recycling Storage areas shall be designed internal to the principal building and shall not be allowed in an external fenced structure. Trash and recycling storage area doors shall not be located on the primary front elevation of building, but may be located in the side or rear yard. Loading Areas and Docks shall be limited to the rear of the principal building and shall not be visible from the street. These areas shall be screened from adjacent residential areas by fencing, walls, or landscaping. Screening shall block views from public right-of-way or adjacent uses and shall be equally effective in winter and summer. Architectural screening and plantings minimize the visual impact of necessary but unappealing portions of this apartment building. 30 | Town Center Facades Facades for non-residential and multi-family residential structures should support a higher level of design as described in this section. Architectural Style shall not be restricted. However, Architectural Styles as described in Section Two are encouraged. Evaluation of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and on its relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions in WKHVHJXLGHOLQHVDQGWKH=RQLQJ2UGLQDQFH The architectural appearance, including building character, permanence, massing, composition, and scale of all principal buildings shall comply with the Master Plan. Franchise architecture (building design WKDWLVWUDGHPDUNHGRULGHQWL¿HGZLWKD particular chain or corporation and is generic in nature) is prohibited unless it employs a traditional storefront commercial style. Franchises or national chains shall follow these guidelines to create context-sensitive buildings that are sustainable in that they can be reused by other types of business. A - Entrances. The main entrance shall face the primary street with secondary entrances to the side or rear. In the case of a corner building or a building abutting more than one street, the City will determine which street should be considered primary. B - Appearance. All sides of buildings shall have an equal appearance in terms of materials and general design. C - Windows. At least 40% of the wall VXUIDFHDWWKHVWUHHWVLGHRIWKH¿UVWVWRU\ non-residential, shall consist of clear windows and doors that allow a view into the working areas, lobbies or display areas. D - Roofs. Building facades that exceed 100 feet in length measured along the street IURQWDJHVKDOOKDYHYDULDWLRQVLQURRÀLQHRU rooftop parapet. Rooftop equipment shall be concealed behind parapets or screened from the view of pedestrians. E - Elements. All buildings shall include the following elements: • Accent materials shall be wrapped around all walls; • Complementary major material colors. F - Articulation. Any exterior building wall adjacent to or visible from a public street, public open space, or abutting property may not exceed 40 feet in length without visual relief consisting of one or more of the following: • The facade shall be divided DUFKLWHFWXUDOO\E\PHDQVRIVLJQL¿FDQWO\ different materials or textures, or • Horizontal offsets of at least four feet in depth, or • 9HUWLFDORIIVHWVLQWKHURRÀLQHRIDWOHDVW four feet, or • )HQHVWUDWLRQDWWKH¿UVWÀRRUOHYHOZKLFK is recessed horizontally at least one foot into the facade. A/CCF D/F B/EA D/F Town Center | 31 G - Materials. ([WHULRUEXLOGLQJPDWHULDOVVKDOOEHFODVVL¿HGHLWKHUSULPDU\VHFRQGDU\ or accent materials. Primary materials shall cover at least 60% of the facade of a building. Secondary materials may cover no more than 30% of the facade. Accent materials may include door and window frames, lintels, cornices, and other minor elements, and may cover no more than 10% of the facade. Allowable materials are as follows: • Primary exterior building materials may be brick, stone (natural or cultured) EIFS, stucco, architectural precast concrete or glass. Bronze tinted or mirror glass are prohibited as exterior materials. • Secondary exterior building materials may be any of the primary building materials above RUGHFRUDWLYHEORFNLQWHJUDOO\FRORUHGVWXFFRRU¿EHUFHPHQWVLGLQJ FRORULPSUHJQDWHGRU painted) in vertical panel design only with hidden seams. • $FFHQWPDWHULDOVPD\EHZRRGPHWDORU¿EHUFHPHQWZKHQXVHGLQWULPIDVFLDRUVRI¿WLI appropriately integrated into the overall building design and not situated in areas which will be subject to physical or environmental damage. • All primary and secondary materials shall be integrally colored, except where otherwise stated. • Decorative block shall be colored only by means of a pigment integral to the block material, not applied to the surface. • 6KHHWPHWDOFRUUXJDWHGPHWDOLURQVKDNHVSODLQÀDWFRQFUHWHEORFNDUHQRWDFFHSWDEOHDV exterior wall materials. 32 | Town Center Streets Walkability is a priority in the Town Center. All streets and crossings should be safe and accessible for pedestrians with enhancements to support low speed vehicular travel, on street parking, and adequate right-of-way for healthy tree canopy. Design components should include paving or striping of crosswalks, curb extensions, pedestrian level and roadway level lighting, tree lined boulevards. Bike lanes can be strategically incorporated on major east/west connectors via the, Bikeway Street type, to provide thoughtful bicycle routes between the County Road 116 linear park into the Town Center district neighborhoods and beyond. Sidewalks are required along all streets within the Town Center. The location and alignment of new sidewalks shall connect directly with adjacent existing networks. The width of the sidewalk shall be consistent with City policy and the design guidelines. Where the sidewalk along the public street is interrupted by a curb cut, the walkway across the driveway shall be delineated by elevated pavement or by use of contrasting pavement materials that meet ADA accessibility standards. Parking. On-street parking shall be incorporated with the street design within the Town Center. 3DUNLQJ]RQHVVKDOOEHGH¿QHGHLWKHUE\FXUELQJRUZLWKDFKDQJHLQSDYLQJPDWHULDOV Curb Cuts. The number and width of curb cuts shall be limited in conformance with City SROLF\6LWHVZLWKPXOWLSOHEXLOGLQJVVKDOOKDYHXQL¿HGMRLQWDFFHVV Utility Installation. New utilities shall be placed underground. Compatible lines (e.g., electric, phone, cable) shall be placed in a common trench. Town Center | 33 Southeast District Street Types Type ROW Width County Road 120 feet Parkway Street 72 feet Main Street (Downtown Core) 70 feet Connector Street 60 feet /RFDO6WUHHW 50 feet 79th Place 79th Place 79th Avenue Main Street 76th Avenue Larkin Road City Center DriveCity Center DriveCounty Road 116Co u n t y R o a d 1 0 Main StreetOak LaneMulberry LaneLarch LaneMaple Hill RoadGood Sheperd Church City Hall 34 | Town Center Parking and Access No parking spaces shall be located on corner lots at the point of street intersections. In the Downtown Core, parking is desired to be located behind the buildings. Reductions. Per 6HFWLRQRIWKH=RQLQJ Ordinance parking may be reduced by: • 8SWRRIUHTXLUHGRIIVWUHHWSDUNLQJVSDFHV in the case of shared parking between abutting uses or use of public parking. • One parking space for each on-street parking space provided at the lot frontage on a public street adjacent to the lot. Pedestrian Circulation. &OHDUO\GH¿QHGVDIH pedestrian access shall be provided from parking areas, adjacent public rights-of-way, and public and private open space to building entrances. Pedestrian walkways traversing parking lots with more than 60 parking spaces shall meet the following guidelines: • Walkways adjacent to parking spaces shall be DWOHDVW¿YHIHHWZLGHDQGVKDOOEHVHSDUDWHG from vehicles by curbing or landscaping. • Walkways that cross parking lot drive aisles shall be delineated by stripes, contrasting pavement materials, elevated pavement, or a combination of these measures. Bicycle Parking. Non-residential developments shall strive to provide bicycle parking spaces in a convenient, visible, preferably sheltered location. Town Center | 35 Landscaping and Screening Parking bays shall have landscape islands at each end, and bays in excess of 15 spaces in OHQJWKVKDOOEHGLYLGHGE\LQWHUPHGLDWHLVODQGV/DQGVFDSHLVODQGVVKDOOSURYLGHDWOHDVW square feet of area for planting trees, shrubs and/or groundcovers. Intermediate landscape islands shall provide at least 180 square feet of planting area. $ODQGVFDSHEXIIHURIDPLQLPXP¿YHIHHWLQZLGWKVKDOOEHSURYLGHGEHWZHHQDOOSDUNLQJDUHDV DQGWKHSXEOLFVLGHZDON7KHEXIIHUVKDOOFRQVLVWRIVKDGHWUHHVORZVKUXEVRUSHUHQQLDOÀRZHUV and a decorative fence or masonry wall. Plantings and parking lot screen walls or fences shall be no less than three feet and no more than four feet in height to allow views into and out of parking areas All land area not occupied by buildings, parking, driveways, sidewalks or other hard surfaces VKDOOEHVRGGHGRUPXOFKHGDQGODQGVFDSHGZLWKDSSURYHGJURXQGFRYHUÀRZHUVVKUXEEHU\ and trees. /DQGVFDSLQJVKDOOLQFOXGHDIXOOFRPSOHPHQWRIRYHUVWRU\RUQDPHQWDODQGHYHUJUHHQWUHHV shrubbery and ground covers which are hardy and appropriate for the locations in which they are planted and provide year-long color and interest. Suggested Trees for the Town Center Valley Forge Elm, Ulmus americana ‘Valley Forge’ Bitternut Hickory, Carya cordiformis Sienna Glen Maple, Acer x freemanii ‘Sienna’ %RXOHYDUG/LQGHQTilia americana ‘Boulevard’ Ohio Buckeye, Aesculus glabra Ginkgo (male), Gingko biloba Bicolor Oak, Quercus bicolor Northern Red Oak, Quercus rubra Princeton Elm, Ulmus americana ‘Princeton’ Accolade Elm, Ulmus x ‘Accolade’ River Birch (single stem), Betula nigra Korean Mountain Ash, Sorbus alnifolia Crabapple species (persistent fruit) -DSDQHVH7UHH/LODFSyringa reticulate 36 | Town Center Community Center The Town Center is intended to be a community gathering space. As such, the City may wish to allow space within the Town Center for a community center that could include recreational space, meeting space and similar uses. This would likely be a public/private partnership if it were to develop. This exhibit is intended to identify the two preferred locations for this type of facility and provide a concept for the size of facility that could be accommodated on either site. This is intended to serve an alternative to the land use concepts envisioned in the Town Center plan. Community Center Option A Community Center Option B Town Center | 37 Community Center Option A Site Area (Acres) 14.1 Building Footprint (SF) 80,500 Community Center Option B Site Area (Acres) 23.0 Building Footprint (SF) 1,001,408 Community Center Option B Community Center Option A 38 | Downtown Core Downtown Core Map: The Downtown Core is focused along Main Street and around a Town Square. Commercial mixed-use (which may include ¿UVWÀRRUFRPPHUFLDOZLWK residential above) is intended for a majority of the Downtown Core with medium and high-density residential uses supporting at the periphery. 79th Place M a i M a MM a M a n S nn S n Str e tr ertr e tr etettetMaiMain Sn StretreeetCitCitCitCitCitCitCiCiCiititity Cy CyCyy Cy CyCy CyCyCyCCentententententenenenentenentter erer er er erererererererDriDriDriDriDriDriDrDrDDrDrveveveveveveveveeeC i t C i t C i t C i t C i t C i C i C i CC i t C i t C i t y C y C y C y C y C y CyCyCy CyCyy C y e n t e n t e n t e n t e n t e n t n e n e n t n e n t n e n t e n t e n n e r e r e r e r e r e r e r e r e r e r r Dr iDr iDr iDr iDr iDr iDr iDr iDr i r iDDrDr i r ii v e v e v e v e v e vv e v e v e v e v e v e v e v CouCouCouCouCouCouCouCouCouuCouuuCoCntyntyntyntyntyntyntyntyntyntyntyyyyyRoRoRoRoRoRooRoRoRoRoRad ad ad adadadadadadaddaa11611611611611161161161161161161111CouCouCouCouCouCCouCouCouCouououountyntyyntyyntyntyntyntyntyntyty yyyRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRRoRoRooad ad ad ad adadadaddddddd 1010110010101011100 Downtown Core | 39 05 Downtown Core Overview The Downtown Core is the commercial and civic heart of Corcoran. It is bound by 79th Avenue on the north, County Road 10 on the south, County Road 116 on the west and City Center Drive on the east. This district is the six block Main Street area as shown on the Downtown Core master plan. It is intended to offer residents and visitors a central community place to serve their daily commercial and personal service needs, and to gather with their neighbors for civic celebrations and social events. Through these guidelines, the Downtown Core will focus public and private investments in a smaller geographic area to support a critical mass of high quality development and public realm amenities. Design requirements in this section are in addition to criteria set in the Downtown Mixed 8VH=RQLQJ'LVWULFWDQGLQWKHVH*XLGHOLQHV :KHUHFRQÀLFWVDULVHWKLVVHFWLRQVKDOO prevail. Vision 'RZQWRZQ&RUFRUDQLVDZDONDEOHLGHQWL¿DEOH SODFHWKDWUHÀHFWVWKHXQLTXHFKDUDFWHURI the community. A mix of restaurants, shops, and services will make it possible to meet daily needs all within a walkable area of the city. This pedestrian scale, with a cohesive building and landscape appearance, will identify this area as uniquely Corcoran. Downtown Core Objectives: 1. Downtown Core maintains the unique heritage and history of Corcoran. 2. Downtown Core is where the community gathers. 3. Downtown Core provides safe, convenient access for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles. 4. Downtown Core provides the daily retail and service needs for the community. 5. Downtown Core is a mix of businesses, public spaces and residential neighborhoods that are connected by complementary design elements and streetscapes. 6. Downtown Core is a destination for the region. Site Development Destination retail, restaurant and entertainment uses, particularly mixed with other synergistic uses, are encouraged. Development should be appropriate for a traditional downtown area, with mixed-use buildings combining retail, commercial, and multi-family residential uses. Buildings - Placement, Massing and Height The area and setback requirements shall EHDVQRWHGLQWKH=RQLQJ2UGLQDQFHIRUWKH district in which the property is located, except that additional standards shall be required for the Downtown Core as noted elsewhere in this document. Height. Buildings are required to be a minimum of two stories in the Downtown Core. Stepping portions of upper stories back from the line of the front façade to provide areas for outdoor terraces and rooftop patios is encouraged. 40 | Downtown Core Streetscape Trees and plantings Overstory trees should be placed with regularity along street frontages in order to create dapple shade within 10-15 years. Space and placement of trees, lighting and signage should be WKRXJKWIXOO\FRQVLGHUHGWRFUHDWHDXQL¿HGZKROHVXSSRUWLYHRI'RZQWRZQ&RUHJRDOV Furnishings Main Street is designed as a traditional downtown main street, lined with street trees and planters, pedestrian level lighting, and furnishings including benches and trash receptacles. These elements shall also occur within the Town Center, to a lesser extent. Outdoor Dining Pavement widths are wider in the Downtown Core than in other areas of the City in order to support the widest variety of streetscape amenities. Outdoor dining shall be permitted through the Downtown Core and shall be placed in the pedestrian buffer area of the sidewalk section. Awnings Where awnings are used, canvas, fabric or vinyl awnings are preferable. If glass or metal awnings are employed, they shall closely complement the building’s architectural character and aesthetic. The bottom of a window awning shall be set at least seven feet above the public sidewalk. Back lighted vinyl awnings and canopy signs shall not be used. Suggested Trees for the Downtown Core Princeton Elm, Ulmus americana ‘Princeton’ Accolade Elm, Ulmus x ‘Accolade’ Skyline Honeylocust, Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis ‘Skyline’ Valley Forge Elm, Ulmus americana ‘Valley Forge’ %RXOHYDUG/LQGHQTilia americana ‘Boulevard’ Ohio Buckeye, Aesculus glabra Ginkgo (male), Ginkgo biloba Kentucky Coffeetree (male), Gymnocladus dioicus -DSDQHVH7UHH/LODFSyringa reticulate Thornless Cockspur Hawthorne, Crataegus crus-galli var. inermis Downtown Core | 41 Sidewalks and Boulevards County Road 116 and Main Street in the Downtown Core warrants a unique design treatment. This intersection will be developed as the entry into the Downtown Core with appropriate identity elements. The County Road 116 linear park will offer trails through a landscaped open space, which extends into the Downtown Core and greater Town Center. The City will continue to work with Hennepin County to ensure that the ultimate design of County Road 116 respects the City’s intention to develop a district that is safe and accessible for all modes of transportation, including walking and biking. Parking 1. No parking spaces shall be located on corner lots at the point of street intersections. 2. No parking spaces shall be located between the immediate front of the principal structure and the abutting front lot line. throughway frontagestreet parking lane pedestrian buffer building type & setback varies by zoning district right-of-way 42 | Downtown Core Public Art Public art is encouraged in the Downtown Core. Durable, safe, artful enhancements to furnishings, paving, signage and building facades are also encouraged. All locations and works of art, regardless of ownership, placed within the public rights of- way or public areas shall be approved by the City Council prior to installation. Downtown Core | 43 Signage Signage shall comply with Chapter 84 of the City Code. However, in the Downtown Core the City is open to considering more creative VLJQDJHWRUHÀHFWWKHHQHUJHWLFFRPPHUFLDO entertainment uses that may be developed in the subdistrict. Decorative neon, moving or other decorative sign types are desirable when displayed within interior storefront windows. 44 | Downtown Core Plazas All properties with principal buildings in excess of 30,000 square feet shall be required to have a public plaza space. The public plaza space shall include benches, ELNHUDFNVWUDVKUHFHSWDFOHVOLJKWLQJ¿[WXUHV and other amenities to create a welcoming space for tenants of the building and members of the public. These plaza spaces should be visible from the public street. Implementation | 45 06 Implementation Introduction The design guidelines provide distinct strategies for guiding form and appearance. This vision will take several years to implement. Successful implementation will require consistent DSSOLFDWLRQRIWKH'HVLJQ*XLGHOLQHVE\&LW\VWDIIDQG&LW\&RXQFLO=RQLQJHQIRUFHPHQWDQG design guidelines will not succeed without the cooperation and commitment of landowners, development interests and the rest of the community. Changes to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map The Corcoran Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines are consistent with the 2040 &RPSUHKHQVLYH3ODQ7KHSURSRVHGFKDQJHVWRWKH=RQLQJ2UGLQDQFHDQG=RQLQJ0DSZLOOEH undertaken as a separate action following adoption of these guidelines. Design Review The design guidelines will be administered by staff as part of the development review process. Staff will incorporate design review to ensure compliance with the design guidelines as a standard step in the development review process. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7h. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Natalie Davis Topic: Agriculture Preserve Application (City File. No. 21-019) Action Required: Approval 60-Day Review Deadline: June 29, 2021 1.Application Request The landowners request City approval for initiation of the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve program on three parcels consisting of 204.55 acres of land owned by the Beverly J. Patnode Trust, Daryl J. Patnode Revocable Trust, James E. Patnode Family Trust, and the Daryl Patnode and Lourdette Patnode Revocable Trusts (PID 19-119-23- 41-0002) (PID 29-119-23-12-0006) (PID 30-119-23-11-0001). They have requested this to be effective for the 2021 tax year, so approvals must be submitted to Hennepin County by May 31, 2021. 2.Background PID 19-119-23-41-0002 is designated as Agricultural Preserve in the 2040 Future Land Use Map with an expiration date of 4/28/2021. PID 29-119-23-12-0006 was not previously enrolled in the Agricultural Preserve program and is designated as Rural/Agricultural Residential in the 2040 Future Land Use Map. An amendment to the 2040 Future Land Use Map is required to guide this parcel as Agricultural Preserve. PID 30-119-23-11-0001 is designated as Agricultural Preserve in the 2040 Future Land Use Map with an expiration date of 10/20/2020. All three properties are zoned as Rural Residential and located outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) shown on the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 3.Analysis of Request The properties are applying to enter the Ag Preserve program without an initiation of expiration. This is consistent with the requirements of Minnesota State Statute §473H. 4. Action Adopt Resolutions 2021-46, 2021-47, and 2021-48 approving designation. Attachments: 1.Resolution 2021-46 Approving Ag Preserve Designation (PID 19-119-23-41- 0002) 2.Resolution 2021-47 Approving Ag Preserve Designation (PID 29-119-23-12- 0006) 3.Resolution 2021-48 Approving Ag Preserve Designation (PID 30-119-23-11- 0001) 4.Aerial Location Map (PID 19-119-23-41-0002) 5.Aerial Location Map (PID 29-119-23-12-0006) 6.Aerial Location Map (PID 30-119-23-11-0001) 7.2040 Land Use Map City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-46 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR METROPOLITAN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE DESIGNATION FOR 68.75 ACRES OF LAND OWNED BY THE BEVERLY J. PATNODE TRUST AND DARYL J. PATNODE REVOCABLE TRUST (PID 19-119-23-41- 0002) (CITY FILE 21-019) WHEREAS, trustees of the Beverly J. Patnode Trust and Daryl J. Patnode Revocable Trust are requesting approval of designation for 68.75 acres of land in one parcel for property legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, MTP West Acres Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property WHEREAS, the above described parcel is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); WHEREAS, the owner of the described parcel has made an official application for their designation as an agricultural preserve; and WHEREAS, the requirements regarding size, covenants, development density and other stipulations of the act are deemed legally satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the property is hereby designated as Agricultural Preserve. BE IT FUTHER RESOLVED, the property be classified as “Agricultural Preserve” in the 2040 Future Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Plan and the related zoning district, which will create more stringent zoning for the duration of the requested designation. No subdivisions can occur unless and until said properties are removed from the Ag Preserve Program. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-46 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of May 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-47 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR METROPOLITAN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE DESIGNATION FOR 55.8 ACRES OF LAND OWNED BY THE JAMES E. PATNODE FAMILY TRUST AND BEVERLY J. PATNODE TRUST (PID 29-119-23-12-0006) (CITY FILE 21-019) WHEREAS, trustees of the James E. Patnode Family Trust and Beverly J. Patnode Trust are requesting approval of designation for 55.8 acres of land in one parcel for property legally described as follows: East 440 Feet of the North 2145 Ft. of the NW ¼ and that part of the West ¼ of the NE ¼ Lying South of the North 355 feet except the Road, Section 29, Township 119, Range 23. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property WHEREAS, the above described parcel is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); WHEREAS, the owner of the described parcel has made an official application for their designation as an agricultural preserve; and WHEREAS, the requirements regarding size, covenants, development density and other stipulations of the act are deemed legally satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the property is hereby designated as Agricultural Preserve. BE IT FUTHER RESOLVED, the property be classified as “Agricultural Preserve” in the 2040 Future Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Plan and the related zoning district, which will create more stringent zoning for the duration of the requested designation. No subdivisions can occur unless and until said properties are removed from the Ag Preserve Program. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-47 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of May 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-48 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR METROPOLITAN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE DESIGNATION FOR 80 ACRES OF LAND OWNED BY THE DARYL PATNODE AND LOURDETTE PATNODE REVOCABLE TRUSTS (PID 30-119-23-11-0001) (CITY FILE 21-019) WHEREAS, trustees of the Daryl Patnode and Lourdette Patnode Revocable Trusts are requesting approval of designation for 80 acres of land in one parcel for property legally described as follows: The East ½ of the NE ¼ of Section 30, Township 119, Range 23, except road. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property WHEREAS, the above described parcel is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); WHEREAS, the owner of the described parcel has made an official application for their designation as an agricultural preserve; and WHEREAS, the requirements regarding size, covenants, development density and other stipulations of the act are deemed legally satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the property is hereby designated as Agricultural Preserve. BE IT FUTHER RESOLVED, the property be classified as “Agricultural Preserve” in the 2040 Future Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Plan and the related zoning district, which will create more stringent zoning for the duration of the requested designation. No subdivisions can occur unless and until said properties are removed from the Ag Preserve Program. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-48 Page 2 of 2 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of May 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Hennepin County Property Map Date: 5/18/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 800 feet PARCEL ID: 1911923410002 OWNER NAME: J E Patnode & B J Patnode Tr PARCEL ADDRESS: 23240 Co Rd No 50, Corcoran MN 55340 PARCEL AREA: 68.75 acres, 2,994,949 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: SALE DATA: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Ag Preserve HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $546,700 TAX TOTAL: $3,348.88 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Ag Preserve HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $561,600 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 Hennepin County Property Map Date: 5/18/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 800 feet PARCEL ID: 2911923120006 OWNER NAME: Beverly J Patnode Et Al Tres PARCEL ADDRESS: 52 Address Unassigned, Corcoran MN 00000 PARCEL AREA: 55.8 acres, 2,430,627 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: SALE DATA: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Ag Preserve HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $319,900 TAX TOTAL: $873.48 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Ag Preserve HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $346,800 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 Hennepin County Property Map Date: 5/18/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 800 feet PARCEL ID: 3011923110001 OWNER NAME: Darryl J Patnode PARCEL ADDRESS: 23301 Co Rd No 50, Corcoran MN 55340 PARCEL AREA: 79.16 acres, 3,448,410 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: $55,000 SALE DATA: 12/2006 SALE CODE: Excluded From Ratio Studies ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Farm HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $878,600 TAX TOTAL: $6,105.96 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Farm HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $932,500 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPion e e r T r l TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 Schutte Rd Oakdale Dr County Road 10 Horseshoe Trl C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersRd Stieg R d Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u sh CreekRushCreek South F o rk R u sh Creek SouthForkRu shC reekThe method and timing of regional wastewater service to be determined through future study. 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 4/28/2021 1/22/2023 1/22/2023 1/21/2021 10/2020 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: \\MSPFSV02\DesignDepot\Library\Software\GIS\Client\City of Corcoran\City wide maps\2040 Future Land Use.mxd Date: 6/16/2020 Time: 10:58:05 AM User: KShay Rural/Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public Parks/Open Space Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open Water Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Future Study Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: May 20, 2021 for the May 27, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: D&D Service Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance for the Property located at 23405 County Road 10 (PID 18-119-23-12-0001) (city file no. 21-012) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:July 14, 2021 1.Application Request The applicant has requested approval of a site plan, a conditional use permit and variance to allow a new 9,600 square foot office building and outdoor storage yard. The building will house office space and vehicle maintenance bays. A conditional use permit is required as the proposed use, Contractors Operations, including accessory outdoor storage, is a conditional use in the CR (Rural Commercial). The applicant has also requested a variance for the project. The variance is to allow an outdoor storage area in the front yard where the Zoning Ordinance allows them in the side and rear yard. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this item at a public hearing on May 6, 2021. There was no one present to speak on this item. The Commission discussed their support for the storage in the front yard and to have the metal on the south side of the building revised to comply with ordinance standards. The Commission voted 3-0 to recommend approval as drafted by staff. 3.Context Zoning and Land Use The site is guided Rural Service/Commercial and zoned CR (rural commercial). The site has an existing home, which would be removed as part of the development. Surrounding Properties The properties to the north and west are guided Rural Commercial and zoned CR or TCR (transitional rural commercial. The properties to the south and east are guided Rural/Ag Residential and zoned RR (Rural Residential). Agenda Item: 7i. D&D Service CUP, SP and Variance (21-012) 2 May 27, 2021 Natural Characteristics of the Site There are a number of smaller wetlands located on the northeast portion of the site. The site has a few trees located near the existing home. All the trees are proposed to be removed with the development of the site. 4. Analysis of Request A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a site plan is limited to whether or not the plan meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the site plan. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed request meets the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. Site Plan The request is for a new building that will house the D&D Service operations along with an outside storage yard for construction vehicles and telecommunication equipment for the business. Design Guidelines/Architecture The building is subject to the building standards in Section 1060.050 of the Zoning Ordinance, but the standards are relaxed for this site because it is located in the CR zoning district. The plans show a 21-foot tall, 9,600 square foot building with prefinished metal panel siding and fiberboard siding as the primary building finishes with a cultured stone band on the front elevation. The building is limited to 50% of any elevation having metal siding. The southern building elevation exceeds the 50% allowed and will need to be revised. The materials show a single color for the primary building material with accent provided on the roof line and through the cultured stone on the building. Mechanical equipment locations are not shown on the plans, but must comply with Section 1060.030 of the Zoning Ordinance standards. Equipment must be screened from view in a way that is integral to the architecture of the building. This equipment may not be located in the front yard. D&D Service CUP, SP and Variance (21-012) 3 May 27, 2021 Lot Analysis Lot standards for the CR district are as follows: CR Standards D&D Service Site Minimum lot area 2.5 acres 16.54 acres Minimum lot width 100 feet 259 feet Minimum lot depth 200 feet 1,310 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From County Road 19* 100 feet 100+ feet Front, From all other streets 50 feet 50+ feet Side (south lot line) 20 feet 20+ feet Rear (east lot line) 20 feet 20+ feet Adjacent to Residential 50 feet 50+ feet Minimum Parking/Drive Aisle Setbacks: Front, From County Road 19* 100 feet 100+ feet Front, From all other streets 50 feet 50+ feet Side and Rear 10 feet 10 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 21 feet Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage 50% unknown% *The 100-foot building and parking setback from CR 19 may be reduced to 60 feet and 25 feet respectively as allowed by Section 1060.080, Subd. K and L. The site plan must be revised to include the proposed impervious surface coverage to ensure compliance. The applicant is proposing to have a gravel storage area which is to the rear of the building from the entrance on County Road 10 but is located in the front yard from County Road 19. Outside storage is not allowed in the front yard and the applicant has requested a variance to allow outside storage in the front yard. This is discussed in more detail in the variance section of this report. Parking The applicant has indicated through the conditional use permit narrative and discussion with city staff that there will be approximately six admin staff present during the day with an additional six that may come and go throughout the day. In addition, there are between 15-20 employees that will be accessing the contracting yard for vehicles, materials and supplies. The plan shows a total of 23 paved parking stalls and 16 gravel parking stalls. The gravel parking stalls need to be paved. The applicant can accomplish this by paving the stalls where they are shown adjacent to the building or the parking stalls can be moved to the north adjacent to the 23 parking stalls shown on the plans. The plans will need to be revised to show one of these solutions. The code requires 1 space per 200 square feet for office, 4 spaces plus one per service bay for auto service area and while a contractor’s yard in not specifically listed staff has determined that 1 space per 7,500 square feet for the contractor’s yard is acceptable. The building has 1,520 square feet of office space and 10 auto service bays and the contractor’s yard is roughly 110,00 square feet. Total D&D Service CUP, SP and Variance (21-012) 4 May 27, 2021 these uses require 36 parking spaces. Staff believes requiring 36 parking spaces to be adequate for the site. The entrance to the site is located on County Road 10 right before it begins widening for the intersection with County Road 19. The entrance does not line up with any of the entrances on the north side of County Road 10. All parking areas are required to have a perimeter of poured, cast in place concrete curb and be paved. The plans show this around the parking area. Signage The ordinance limits signage to one 64-sq. ft. freestanding sign per property and wall signage up to 10% of the wall area of the elevation with the primary building entrance. On this building that would allow up to 168 sq. ft. of signage on the north elevation. Wall signs are limited to one sign at the primary entrance. The plans show a 120 sq. ft. area for signage on the north elevation. This would comply with ordinance requirements. Signs may be illuminated according to the standards of Section 84.04, Subd. 8 of the Sign Ordinance. The applicant must provide information showing compliance with these standards as part of the sign permit application. Staff has a condition stating that all signage must comply with ordinance standards. All signs require a permit to be constructed and will be reviewed at the time of permit submittal. Outside Storage The Zoning Ordinance requires all exterior storage shall be located in the rear or side yard and be screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties and public streets. The applicant is requesting a variance to locate the exterior storage in the front yard facing County Road 19. Staff is recommending that a fence be installed to screen the outdoor storage yard. Typically, users like this have used chain link fence with slats to provide the screening but other materials could be used. If the fence does not have slats, then additional landscaping will be required to screen with the same effect as the slats. A screen fence, landscaping or combination will be required to meet the screening requirements in the Zoning Ordinance, which requires exterior storage to be located in the rear or side yard and screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties and public streets. The applicant has a future gravel expansion area shown on the plans. Staff is comfortable with a fence being installed along the future expansion area so that the fence doesn’t need to be removed with a future expansion. However, the applicant will need to provide a temporary means of limiting the storage yard area to the currently proposed size through the use of curb stops, jersey barriers or other means. This will ensure that the storage area does not expand beyond the approved storage area. D&D Service CUP, SP and Variance (21-012) 5 May 27, 2021 Landscaping The applicant’s landscape plan is generally consistent with ordinance requirements by providing landscaping around the building and parking lot. The applicant is required to provide 79 overstory trees and 132 understory shrubs or the equivalent to meet ordinance requirements. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan which meets these requirements, however additional plantings to screen the use are needed. Section 1060.060 of the City Code notes that planting screens are the preferred method of screening and the planting screen shall consist of hardy trees that will provide a minimum of 80 percent opacity year-round. Planting screens shall contain a mix of overstory and understory plantings and a mix of deciduous and coniferous materials. It also states that fences or walls may be used in conjunction with landscaping to provide screening. When required for screening, minimum of 80 percent opacity shall be provided. This typically requires a double row of conifers or a mix of landscaping and fencing. The additional landscaping to meet the screening requirements can be accomplished with additional trees along the west and south property line adjacent the to the storage yard. A revised landscape plan should be submitted for staff review and approval. Additionally, it is required to screen the parking area from the right of way and adjacent properties. Additional plantings are needed to adequately screen the parking area. A revised landscape plan is needed to address this condition. Streets/Access Hennepin County has reviewed the application and has requested an east bound right turn lane be provided. This has been incorporated in the engineer’s comment letter and as a condition in the draft resolution. Utilities The site is proposed to be served by well and septic. The plans show a septic tank and drain field with a second tank and drain field area for future expansions. Lighting The applicant has submitted a photometric plan that appears to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant must provide information about the height of the poles and base of the freestanding light fixtures for staff review. The ordinance standard is either 30 feet or the roofline of the principal building, whichever is less. Detail sheets should be provided to ensure the proposed lighting fixtures for the property all provide the 90-degree cutoff as required. D&D Service CUP, SP and Variance (21-012) 6 May 27, 2021 Parks and Trails The Comprehensive Plan shows a future on-road trail running along County Road 10. The on-road trail will be constructed by the County when the road is improved. This property is not being subdivided; therefore, park dedication is not required. Stormwater Management Drainage swales are proposed to handle the stormwater for the site. The city engineer has a number of comments in the memo related to stormwater that the applicant must address. The applicant must obtain final approval from the City and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission before any site grading or activity may commence. Conditional Use Permit The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow “Contractors Operations, including accessory outdoor storage” for the new D&D service. Section 1040.090, Subd. 4 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the landowner to request a CUP if they comply with the Conditional Use Permit standards in Section 1070.020 of the Zoning Ordinance. Specifically: A. Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed contractor operations use is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated on this site by the Comprehensive Plan. It will also be consistent with Goal 2, Policy 2 of the Economic Competitiveness chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to “Support efforts to recruit new businesses and industries in appropriate locations. B. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community. The use is allowed within the CR district. C. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The new business is a conditional use in the CR district and conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with ordinance standards. D&D Service CUP, SP and Variance (21-012) 7 May 27, 2021 D. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. E. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. The site is located outside of the MUSA and can be served with well and septic. F. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. G. The conditional use and site conforms to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. Variance for Outdoor Storage in the Front Yard The applicant’s narrative requests a variance to allow outdoor storage in the front yard adjacent to County Road 19. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all of the following criteria have been met: 1. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The property is unique in that, while it bounds both County Roads 10 and 19, access from the property will be restricted to County Road 10. Due to having two front yards the property is restricted to having outside storage only to the south and east of the building. With the existing wetlands located on the east side of the property it is difficult to create an outdoor storage yard which complies with the Zoning Ordinance and provides the space to park construction vehicles and construction equipment with adequate access. 2. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The property is uniquely shaped with two street frontages and it would be difficult to fully use the double frontage without allowing storage in the front yard area. 3. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. D&D Service CUP, SP and Variance (21-012) 8 May 27, 2021 Granting the variance for outdoor storage in the front yard will not alter the essential character of the locality. There are many similar contracting uses in the area and the outdoor storage area will be screened using fencing, berms and landscaping. 4. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The proposed variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance through screening which will achieve the same general purpose. 5. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow development that is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated in the comprehensive plan. 6. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. If the City approves the variance, staff recommends additional screening in the form of a fence and landscaping be included to address the impact. Conditions have been included in the draft resolution. 5. Conclusions Staff has reviewed the plans with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Zoning Plan and Zoning Ordinance and finds that the standards for a site plan and CUP have been met. The proposed use is the type of use envisioned for this rural commercial area of the City and staff has included conditions to address outstanding issues. Staff finds that the variance standards have been met and recommends approval of the requested variance. If the Planning Commission finds that the variance standards have not been met, they should recommend denial of the request and provide findings of fact for denial. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2021-49 approving the site plan, the conditional use permit and variance as recommended by the Planning Commission. Attachments 1. Resolution 2021-49 approving Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance 2. Site Location Map 3. Engineer’s memo dated April 26, 2021 4. Hennepin County Comments date March 17, 2021 5. Public Safety Comments dated April 6, 2021 6. Applicant’s Narrative received March 16, 2021 7. Applicant Response to Comments received May 6, 2021 D&D Service CUP, SP and Variance (21-012) 9 May 27, 2021 8. Architectural Plans dated April 6, 2021 9. Civil Plans dated April 6, 2021 10. Landscaping Plan dated April 6, 2021 11. Lighting Plans dated April 6, 2021 City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-49 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 23405 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 18-119-23-12-0001) (CITY FILE NO. 21-012) WHEREAS, Amcon Construction (“the applicant”) is requesting approval of a site plan, conditional use permit and variance to allow contractor’s operations, including accessory outdoor storage in the CR (rural commercial) district and a variance to allow outdoor storage in the front yard on property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan, conditional use permit and variance at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A site plan and conditional use permit are approved to allow for the construction of a building as shown on application and plans received by the City on March 16, 2021, and additional information received on April 6, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The applicant must comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated April 26, 2021. 3. The applicant must comply with the Hennepin County comments dated March 17, 2021. 4. The applicant must comply with the Public Safety Plan Review comments dated April 7, 2021: a. Gravel storage yard area must pass a roll test. 5. The variance to allow outdoor storage in the front yard is approved based on the following findings: a. The property is slightly unique in that, while it bounds both County Roads 10 and 19, access from the property will be restricted to County Road 10. Due to having two front yards the property is restricted to having outside storage only to the south and east of the building. With the existing wetlands located on the east side of the property it is difficult to create an outdoor storage yard which complies with the zoning ordinance and provides the space to park construction vehicles and construction equipment with adequate access. b. The property is uniquely shaped with two street frontages and it would be difficult to fully use the double frontage without allowing storage in the front yard area. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-49 Page 2 of 5 c. Granting the variance for outdoor storage in the front yard will not alter the essential character of the locality. There are many similar contracting uses in the area and the outdoor storage area will be screened using fencing, berms and landscaping. d. The proposed variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance through screening which will achieve the same general purpose e. The variance would allow development that is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated in the comprehensive plan. 6. A conditional use permit is approved, subject to the finding that the applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance have been met. Specifically: a. The proposed contractor operations use is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated on this site by the Comprehensive Plan. It will also be consistent with Goal 2, Policy 2 of the Economic Competitiveness chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to “Support efforts to recruit new businesses and industries in appropriate locations. b. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community. The use is allowed within the CR district. c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The new business is a conditional use in the CR district and conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with ordinance standards. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. e. The site is located outside of the MUSA and can be served with well and septic. f. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. g. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. 7. An east bound turn lane shall be constructed along County Road 10, as required by Hennepin County. 8. Mechanical equipment must be screened from view in a way that is integral to the architecture of the building. This equipment may not be located in the front yard. The plans must be revised to show compliance. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-49 Page 3 of 5 9. A revised building elevation for the southern elevation is required which reduces the metal siding to less than 50%. 10. All parking and drive areas shall have a perimeter of poured, cast in place concrete curb. 11. The site plan shows 23 paved parking stalls and 16 gravel parking stalls. a. The plans must be revised to have all parking stalls paved. 12. All signage shall comply with the standards in Chapter 84. a. Signage must show compliance with the lighting standards in Section 84.04, Subd. 8 of the sign ordinance. b. All signs require a permit in order to be constructed and will be reviewed at the time of permit submittal. 13. A revised lighting plan is required to be submitted for review and approval by the City. a. Details about the light pole and base shall be provided to ensure compliance with height limits. b. Details for the lighting fixtures shall be provided. 14. A revised landscape and fencing plan shall be submitted to show the following as required by Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance: a. A fence shall be included which screens the outdoor storage. The fence should run around the west, south and east sides of the outdoor storage area. b. Additional trees should be included on the western berm area to screen a greater area. c. Additional trees should be included on the south lot line to screen the storage area. d. Provide City of Corcoran Landscape details. e. If the required screening is provided at the edge of the future expansion area, the plans must show barriers that will be installed to contain outside storage the area approved for this initial phase. 15. The developer shall enter into a site improvement agreement and submit a financial guarantee for the proposed work as outlined in Section 1070.050, Subd. 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 16. The applicant must enter into a stormwater management agreement. 17. A building permit is required prior to beginning construction. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-49 Page 4 of 5 18. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: a. The applicant shall submit any and all necessary permits to the watershed and receive approval and shall provide proof of permits to the City. b. Record the approving resolution and required easements at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 19. FURTHER, any request to inspect the required landscaping in order to reduce financial guarantees must be accompanied by recertification/verification of field inspection by the project landscape architect. A letter signed by the project landscape architect verifying plantings have been corrected and is in compliance with the plans and specifications will suffice. 20. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use and completes the required improvements. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of May 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-49 Page 5 of 5 Attachment A That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 18 distant 638.80 feet South from the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence North along said West line 259.30 feet to a point 379.50 feet South from the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence East, parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 128.75 feet; thence North parallel with said West line, a distance of 239.25 feet; thence West, parallel with said North line, a distance of 36 feet; thence North, parallel with said West line, a distance of 8.25 feet; thence East, parallel with said North line, a distance of 212.25 feet; thence North, parallel with said West line, 132 feet to said North line; thence East along said North line to the Northeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence South along the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 638.80 feet; thence West to the point of beginning. Hennepin County Property Map Date: 4/29/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 400 feet PARCEL ID: 1811923120001 OWNER NAME: Cml Corcoran Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 23405 Co Rd No 10, Corcoran MN 55357 PARCEL AREA: 16.54 acres, 720,594 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: $501,000 SALE DATA: 09/2019 SALE CODE: Excluded From Ratio Studies ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Ag Nhstd Mult Unit HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $351,400 TAX TOTAL: $4,756.50 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $347,900 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Project: D&D Service Date: April 26, 2021 Exhibits: This memorandum is based on a review of the Preliminary Plans (3/15/2021) by Quetica Consulting and Engineering for a rural commercial development on 16+/- acres at the southeast quadrant of CR 10 and CR 19 in Corcoran. The site was previously approved as Comlink. Comments: General: 1. Consistent with the review process, a response letter shall be provided in response to the following comments provided in this Memorandum in which the applicant provides a written response to each item. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per reviews, the project is subject to additional planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. 3. Wetland delineation was completed as part of Comlink project. 4. Stormwater management plan is required to receive City authorization prior to submitting to the Elm Creek WMO. CR 10 Access The prior development access had received review from the County. Comments are attached. In summary; 1. The County controls the access approval process including site lines, location, etc. 2. County (Comlink, May 2019) comments suggested an east bound right turn lane was required that involved widening (8 to 9 feet) of the existing pavement. a. Turn lane shall be shown on development plans. b. Submit County permit to City prior to a preconstruction meeting. Grading 1. Two percent (2%) swales are recommended for reducing long term maintenance. 2. Two percent grading is recommended on gravel parking lots for drainage. 3. Clarify flow direction on Sheet EXH2 in southwest corner. 4. Northwest septic area shall not block drainage from offsite. April 2021 D&D Preliminary Plan Review Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 Stormwater Management The site drainage is generally to the east/south and eventually contributes to a ditch within the adjacent Roehlke parcel and discharges north under CR 10. 1. Drainage and utility easements over stormwater BMPs and conveyances will be reviewed during final plan reviews. 2. No pond area is shown, however the prior Comlink approval had a pond for stormwater management. Current plans show vegetated swales only. 1. Applicant has stated that swale drainage to northeast was designed to avoid discharging across adjacent Roehlke parcel, this may be modified with revised stormwater management. 3. Stormwater model needs revisions using inputs similar to Comlink; Existing curve numbers (CNs) shall represent C soils with use of row crops in good condition at CN = 85, proposed CNs shall represent D soils. Treatment is required at discharge points into the County ditch. Sheet flow shall be limited to 100 feet. This change will affect the calculated rates of runoff. Model inputs show the amount of “brush” land use area increases with developed conditions. If a woody/brush area will be established as part of reducing runoff, vegetation plans, topsoil amendments and protective easements are required. Delineated wetland areas (existing and proposed) shall be CN = 98. Proposed land use composite CN shall increase (model inputs currently show decrease from 86 to 85, therefore calculates less runoff after development). Applicant may choose to design and permit stormwater management for full site buildout, rather than phased implementation. 4. Site will require a WMO permit. 1. The WMO reviews for grading, flow rates, water quality, and volume. Typically a pond or filtration basin are implemented with development. 2. If filtration is pursued for WMO permit compliance, the City prefers a combination NURP pond/filtration shelf BMP that will also reduce long term maintenance costs for the Owner. City details will be provided. Wetlands 1. Existing wetlands received drainage from the south, however the swale system isolates these wetlands from drainage. Additional review for maintaining hydrology will occur with subsequent grading plan submittals. End of Comments From:Jason D Gottfried To:Natalie Davis; Michael Pritchard; Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Kevin Mattson Cc:Ashley Morello; Michael D Olmstead; mgottschalk@ci.corcoran.mn.us; rburns@ci.corcoran.mn.us; Kent Torve; Matthew A Bolterman Subject:RE: [External] Distribution #21-012 D&D Service - CUP, Site Plan, and Variance Date:Thursday, March 18, 2021 10:08:59 AM Attachments:Compiled Plans.pdf HC Comments - Comlink proposal at County Road"s 19 and 10.msg Hello Natalie, et al, This planset looks substantially similar to the previous concept plan we discussed in 2018-2019 for the site with many of our previous recommendations accommodated (attached). Prior to permitting however, we would need to see greater detail for the following items previously requested: Details for the widened shoulder for the EB right-turn approach Ensure regrading of the ditch along the frontage for proper drainage with a culvert underneath the driveway Additionally / ROW Does sketch PUD constitute boundary subdivision? – If so, we would request dedication necessary to match a 60-foot half right-of-way section (from centerline of County Road 10) Additionally, as previously discussed, we question the long-range future of this SF homestead along County Road 19. Ideally, an access easement(s) could be provided across the SW end of this site, so that should that property redevelop along County Road 19 in the future it wouldn’t be landlocked and obliged to have access so close to the busy intersection (CSAH 19 & 10). We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment, and as always please reach out if you would like to discuss any of these items in more detail Thanks and be well! Jason Jason Gottfried Transportation Planner Transportation Planning Office: 612-596-0394 Cell: 612-719-8073jason.gottfried@hennepin.usHennepin County Public Works1600 Prairie DriveMedina, MN 55340(working remotely) From: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 12:20 PM To: Michael Pritchard <MPritchard@corcoranmn.gov>; Kendra Lindahl <klindahl@landform.net>; Kevin Mattson <kmattson@ci.corcoran.mn.us>; mgottschalk@ci.corcoran.mn.us; rburns@ci.corcoran.mn.us; Kent Torve <ktorve@wenck.com>; Matthew A Bolterman <Matthew.Bolterman@hennepin.us>; Jason D Gottfried <Jason.Gottfried@hennepin.us> Cc: Ashley Morello <Ashley.Morello@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Distribution #21-012 D&D Service - CUP, Site Plan, and Variance Please find enclosed the plans and narratives for a new application for D&D Service with a request for a Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, and Variance. The application is tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission review on May 6, 2021. We ask that you please provide comments no later than April 19, 2021. Thank you, Natalie Davis Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 www.ci.corcoran.mn.us ndavis@corcoranmn.gov Direct: 763-258-4272 Main: 763-420-2288 City of Corcoran - A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message from your computer system. CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us Memo To: Planning (Planners Lindahl and Davis) From: Director Gottschalk Date: April 7, 2021 Re: D & D Service A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on 04/07/2021. In attendance were: Director of Public Safety Gottschalk, Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Planner Davis, Fire Chief Feist, Fire Chief Dave Malewicki, and Fire Chief Leuer. The comments are preliminary and additional meetings with the developer and building officials will be required. The following public safety comments are provided for the project: 1. Since the entire gravel parking area currently serves as a fire lane it will be required to pass a roll test to support fire apparatus. 2. Additional meetings with the building official and fire officials may be necessary to finalize fire code requirements specific to the structure(s). This memo serves as a preliminary review and assumes that all specifications not articulated in the concept meet City standards. Additional fire and building codes will apply. City of Corcoran Conditional Use Permit Application Process 4. A written narrative describing the proposal (Section 1070.020 Subd. 2, A), including: a. Nature of request: i. KMM Land Development is submitting a request for a conditional use permit, site plan and variance for a Contractors Operations, including accessory outside storage. The site plan includes space for inside storage in the initial building being constructed, shop/storage proposed buildings, a gravel outside storage area (80’ x100’) that will be fenced in for outside material storage, and paved and gravel parking areas on 16.54 acres. We anticipate the build out being in three or four phases. It is our understanding that property is already zoned Rural Commercial (CR), which includes contractor yards similar to some neighbors in close vicinity such as ESS Brothers and Doboszenski. b. Impact on adjoining properties and mitigating measures to minimize impact: i. Our site plan includes ample berms along both County Rd 10 in front of the office/shop building and to the west in front of County Rd 19, then going south and running back east towards the bottom of the property. We would also have fenced in area for outside material storage area with a berm to the north of the fenced in area. c. Buildings to be constructed or utilized: i. KMM Land Development plans on renting/leasing the property to it’s sister Company, KKRA, LLC dba D&D Service. Initially D&D will construct an 8300 sq. ft. building. A 2nd phase would allow an expansion of this building by adding a few more bays within 2 – 5 years. Third and 4th phases could occur within 6 – 10 years. and would include additional shop buildings for inside storage and shop space for anticipated vehicle and equipment growth as D&D Service is hoping to expand operations. d. Intended use of buildings and property: i. The first building constructed will house a small office area for administrative staff, a light mechanical shop for small repair such as oil changes, light bulb replacement, minor brake jobs, touch up work on paint, etc., a space for internal equipment storage, and bays to store some of our larger trucks and underground construction equipment, especially during cold weather months. Future expansion buildings will be additional shop buildings for inside storage and shop space for anticipated vehicle and equipment growth as D&D Service is hoping to expand operations. D&D has a fleet of around 65 vehicles and over 30 trailers that would be parked in the Class 5 sections of the property. Around 10 – 15 of these vehicles would not be stored overnight at this site. D&D has several directional drills and associated trailers, Vac systems used in conjunction with drills that would either be stored in bays or on the Class 5 areas. Other equipment being stored would include plows, Trak-hoes, bobcats, aerial bucket trucks, excavators, backhoes, and outside storage containers. e. Hours and days of operation: i. 7 am – 7 pm – Monday – Saturday, limited Sunday work usually emergency work – much of the equipment would be out in the field during normal working hours f. Number of Employees i. 60 from December thru March – 85 between April and November total employees – about 10 – 15 employees report to the Admin office currently located elsewhere, or from home g. Size of operation, including number of animals, if applicable i. NA h. Impact on traffic, including type and amount of traffic, access, parking provisions i. The existing drive onto County Rd 10 will be removed and replaced with one paved drive that will run into a paved parking lot in front of the building as well as allow traffic to run south and north into Class 5 sections for additional parking on the west and east sides of parking lot. The north and south driving lanes will have class 5 base and an additional 2” to 3” limestone rock rolled into the class 5, then add calcium chloride on top to mitigate any dust issues. As the new occupant of the land is not retail, minimal impact on traffic will occur in the area. Most vehicles and equipment will be headed to work locations in the morning and will return late afternoon or early evening, meaning that there won’t be a lot of traffic looking for our location. i. Impact on septic system and well. i. We are proposing to move the existing well, septic tanks and mounds, and will install a new septic sewer mounts and absorption fields in accordance with all required regulations. j. Potential environmental impacts and measures to avoid or minimize the potential impacts: i. Should be minimal – we don’t use hazardous materials, but do have a hazardous license as it relates to storing oil. All drains from shop areas will drain to a holding tank and not a septic field, as required by code, to avoid any potential contaminants from entering the groundwater. k. Proposed measures to provide buffering from proposed use to adjacent properties i. Our site plan includes ample berms along both County Rd 10 in front of the office/shop building and to the west in front of County Rd 19, then going south and running back east towards the bottom of the property. We would also have fenced in area for outside material storage area with a berm to the north of the fenced in area. l. Future expansion plans i. Future expansion plans on the property would include expanding the Class V areas of the site plan to allow for expansion of vehicles and equipment, a 2nd phase would allow an expansion of the initial building constructed by adding a few more bays within 2 – 5 years. Third and 4th phases could occur within 6 – 10 years. and would include additional shop buildings for inside storage and shop space for anticipated vehicle and equipment growth as D&D Service is hoping to expand operations. m. Nature of other uses in the neighborhood i. ESS Brothers and Doboszenski 7. Necessary Permits or licenses from other agencies, or confirmation of appropriate applications in process: a. Technology Systems Contractor – TS002069 b. Gopher One Call – 37049 c. Hazardous Waste License – Site ID 00118120 05311528, ID # - MND985753805 11. Certification that all property taxes, special assessment have been paid. a. 2020 taxes have been paid per a search of the property id at the Hennepin County web site. 2021 taxes are pending. City of Corcoran Variance Application Process 4. A written description of the request for the variance, including an explanation of compliance with the variance criteria set forth in the section. (Section 970.030 and Section 1070.040, Subd. 2, B) The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all of the following criteria have been met: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. (Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.) i. The property the request is being made for is slightly unique in that, while it bounds both County Roads 10 and 19, access and egress from the property will be restricted to only County Road 10. Additionally, the property is being acquired by a Utility/Telecommunications Construction Contractor, D&D Service, which has a fleet of around 65 vehicles and over 30 trailers that would be parked in the Class 5 sections of the property for which a request of a variance is being requested. Due to having 2 “front yards” and the fact that we need space to the south and west of the property to park construction vehicles, construction equipment and some employee vehicles makes it difficult to comply with Zoning Ordinances without a variance. The applicant will provide abundant berms throughout the property, on the south side 10 in front of parking lot and initial building, along the west side of property near 19, and along the south side of the property all the way to just west of the proposed pond. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. i. The property is uniquely shaped with two street frontages and it would be difficult to fully use the double frontage without allowing storage in this area. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. i. The granting of a variance would not alter the essential character of the locality – the outdoor storage will be screened by berms, landscaping and or fencing. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. i. We believe that the variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. e. The variance is consistent with the with the Comprehensive Plan. i. We believe that the type of business we have and the purposes we have detailed about our use of the property are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. f. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance, i. We understand the City’s responsibilities and look forward to work with City Staff to discuss any conditions they may feel needs to be addressed. 7. Certification that all property taxes, special assessment have been paid. a. 2020 taxes have been paid per a search of the property id at the Hennepin County web site. 2021 taxes are pending. 9. An irrevocable letter of credit. (Section 1070.040, Subd. 6) a. Not quite sure how to answer this – Greg O – any thoughts? DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 Baker Road, Suite 101 | Minnetonka, MN 55345 | Tel: 651.379.9090 | Fax: 651.379.9091 Email: custserv@amconconstruction.com | Website: www.amconconstruction.com May 6, 2021 City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Project: 21001 D&D Service 23405 County Road 10 Corcoran, MN 55357 Re: Response to review comments for Conditional Use Permit & Variance. 1. A site plan and conditional use permit are approved to allow for the construction of a building as shown on application and plans received by the city on March 16, 2021 and additional information received on April 6, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. Response: Understood. 2. The applicant must comply with all conditions in the city engineer’s memo dated April 26. Response: Understood. 3. The applicant must comply with the Hennepin County comments dated March 17, 2021. Response: Understood. 4. The applicant must comply with the Public Safety Plan Review comments dated April 7, 2021. Response: Understood. 4a. Gravel storage yard area must pass a roll test. Response: Understood, the class V rock used for the storage areas will be compacted appropriately for fire truck access. 5. The variance to allow outdoor storage in the front yard is approved based on the following findings: 5c. Granting the variance for outdoor storage in the front yard will not alter the essential character of the locality. There are many similar contracting uses in the area and the outdoor storage areas will be screened using fencing, berms and landscaping. Response: The trees originally shown along the east end of the southerly property line will be evenly redistributed along the southwest, west and northwest property boundaries to better screen the equipment storage areas. DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 Baker Road, Suite 101 | Minnetonka, MN 55345 | Tel: 651.379.9090 | Fax: 651.379.9091 Email: custserv@amconconstruction.com | Website: www.amconconstruction.com 6. The A conditional use permit is approved, subject to the finding that the applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance have been met. Specifically: 7. An east bound turn lane shall be constructed along County Road 10, as required by Hennepin County. Response: Our civil eng. received an email from Eric Drager, PE at Hennepin County on May 6, 2021 we will be required to develop a roadway plan set for the right turn lane and submit it to Hennepin County. It will be reviewed and eventually signed by the county engineer when final. Once that is complete, we will then work with Hennepin County on the permit and coordinate field inspections during construction. We are still working with Hennepin County to determine the required geometry of the east bound right turn lane. 8. Mechanical equipment must be screened from view in a way that is integral to the architecture of the building. This equipment may not be located in the front yard. The plans must be revised to show compliance. Response: The only mechanical equipment will be a small residential size A/C unit outside of the office area on the north end of the building. It will be located either on the North end of the W. or E. side of the office area and will be screened with landscaping. 9. A revised building elevation for the southern elevation is required which reduces the metal siding to less than 50%. Response: The current exterior elevations show only 38% (overall) of the exterior material to be metal panels with the most visible elevation (north) facing County Road 10 with 0% metal panels. The exterior elevations will be revised to reduce the metal panel % on the south elevation. 10. All parking and drive areas shall have a perimeter of poured, cast in place concrete curb. Response: All paved driveway and parking lot areas will be redesigned with a perimeter of poured, cast-in-place concrete curb. 11. The site plan shows 23 paved parking stalls and 16 gravel parking stalls. a. The plans must be revised to have all parking stalls paved. Response: The parking design will be revised to provide all employee parking stalls to be paved via an expansion of the paved parking lot shown on the submitted plans (north of the proposed building). The parking stalls shown on the class V areas will be deleted. 12. All signage shall comply with the standards in chapter 84. Response: The exterior elevations showing “SIGNAGE” is only design intent place holder and the signage will be provided by others. 13. A revised lighting plan is required to be submitted for review and approval by the city. Response: Understood. a. Details about the light pole and base shall be provided to ensure compliance with height limits. Response: Understood, detailed product information will be submitted. b. Details for the light fixtures shall be provided. DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 Baker Road, Suite 101 | Minnetonka, MN 55345 | Tel: 651.379.9090 | Fax: 651.379.9091 Email: custserv@amconconstruction.com | Website: www.amconconstruction.com Response: Understood, detailed product information will be submitted. 14. A revised landscape and fencing plan shall be submitted to show the following as required by section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance: Response: Understood, a.The landscaping will be revised to provide screening of the phase 1 outdoor storage area. Response: Per a conversation with the City on May 5, 2021 a fence will not be required as part of the solution identified in item 5c above. b.Additional trees should be included on the western berm area to screen a greater area. Response: Understood, to be discussed with the city. c.Additional trees should be included on the south lot line to screen the storage areas. Response: Per a conversation with the City on May 5, 2021 a fence will not be required as part of the solution identified in item 5c above. d. Provide City of Corcoran Landscape details. Response: Understood. e.If the required screening is provided at the edge of the future expansion area, the plans must show barriers that will be installed to contain outside storage the area approved for this initial phase. Response: The expansion areas to the west, southwest & south will be part of this initial first phase of work & be complete within the 1 year permitted timeline. No barriers will be needed then. 18. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: a. The applicant shall submit any and all necessary permits to the watershed and receive approval and shall provide proof of permits to the City. Response: Understood. c.Record the approving resolution and required easements at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. d.Response: Understood. 19. FURTHER, any request to inspect the required landscaping in order to reduce financial guarantees must be accompanied by recertification/ verification of the field inspection by the project landscape architect. A letter signed by the project landscape architect verifying plantings have been corrected and is in compliance with the plans and specifications will suffice. Response: Understood. Revised plans will be re-submitted as required for final approval. Thank you, Greg Kinney Project Architect DATE: 4.5.2021CHECKED BY: E. BeazleyDRAWN BY: A. AndersonPROJECT NO.: P21110REVISION:0PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIOND&D SERVICECORCORAN, MNCity Submittal 3.15.2021C0-1COVERWARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXCERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. D&D SERVICE PROJECT SITE N89°43'23"E 305.00 N89°43'23"E 128.75 S89°43'23"W 36.00 N00°08'51"E 8.25 N89°43'23"E 212.25 N00°08'51"E 132.00 N89°43'23"E 1007.07 S89°43'23"W 1310.34 32.77 33.0033.001271.53 38.81 605.80S00°18'09"W 638.8095.98 99.00379.50N89°58'18"E 235.01 N01°11'13"W 259.33S00°16'37"E 10.79 N00°16'37"W 9.77 34.6 34.734.634.725.4 48.225.848.232.2 60.032.060.148.1 30.348.330.120.1 26.019.926.19.5 7.59.47.424.3 10.924.610.422.4 16.322.216.3N00°08'51"E 259.30N00°08'51"E 239.25N89°43'23"E 313.76 N89°43'23"E 458.21XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X XXXX X X X X X XXXXXX X XXXX X X X X X XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX X X X X X X X XREMOVE EXISTING SILT FENCE TO BE DISPOSEDPROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND HOUSESPROTECT EXISTING SILT FENCE AND WETLANDS STRIP TOP SOIL AND STOCKPILE ON SITE PHASE 2 REMOVALS A REA - F UTU RE PHASE 2 REMOVALS AREA - FUTURE PHASE 2 REMOVALS AREA - FUTURE DATE: 4.5.2021CHECKED BY: E. BeazleyDRAWN BY: A. AndersonPROJECT NO.: P21110REVISION:0PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIOND&D SERVICECORCORAN, MNCity Submittal 3.15.2021THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES AND OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXCERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. NOTES: 1. SEE THE NOTES SHEET (C4-1) FOR FULL REMOVALS NOTES, WHICH ARE INTEGRAL TO THIS PLAN SHEET. 2. PROTECT EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER ALONG STREETS AND OTHERWISE, EXCEPT AS NOTED. 3. SAWCUT ALL EDGES (ALONG REMOVAL AREAS) OF PAVEMENT & CURB/GUTTER. 4. PROTECT EXISTING STREETS AND ALLEY. 5. PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES 6. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING DEBRIS TRACKED OFF SITE. X X X X X X X X PLACE SILT FENCE AROUND PERIMETER OF DISTURBED AREA ROW BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINE BIOLOG REMOVE AND DISPOSE ALL SURFACE FEATURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, BRUSH, DEBRIS, CURB AND GUTTER, PAVEMENT, SIGNS, BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPING, ETC. EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL ON SITE C1-1REMOVALS PLAN N89°43'23"E 305.00 N89°43'23"E 128.75 S89°43'23"W 36.00 N00°08'51"E 8.25 N89°43'23"E 212.25 N00°08'51"E 132.00 N89°43'23"E 1007.07 S89°43'23"W 1310.34 32.77 33.0033.001271.53 38.81 605.80S00°18'09"W 638.8095.98 99.00379.50N89°58'18"E 235.01 N01°11'13"W 259.33S00°16'37"E 10.79 N00°16'37"W 9.77 N00°08'51"E 239.25N89°43'23"E 313.76 N89°43'23"E 458.21 20.0' 50.0' 50.0'50.0'WET WET WET WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWE T WETWETWETWETWET WET WET WET W E T WETWETWETWETWE T WETWETWET WE T WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WETWET W E T WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWE T WET WETWETWETWETWE T WE T WET WET WET WETWETWE TWETWET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WET WETWETWE T W E T WE TWETWETWETWETW E T WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWE T WET WET WET WET WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETW E T WET WET WET WET WETWETFFE = 1004.2 26.0' 9.0' TYP. 18.5' TYP 26.0' 32.0' 80.0' 26.0' 100.0' FFE = 1005.5 FFE = 1003.5 2%1%.5% .5%.5%DATE: 4.5.2021CHECKED BY: E. BeazleyDRAWN BY: A. AndersonPROJECT NO.: P21110REVISION:0PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIOND&D SERVICECORCORAN, MNCity Submittal 3.15.2021THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES AND OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. NOTES: 1. SEE THE NOTES SHEET (C4-1) FOR FULL SITE PLAN NOTES, WHICH ARE INTEGRAL TO THIS PLAN SHEET. 2. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 3. SEE THE REMOVALS PLAN FOR PROTECTION OF EXISTING FEATURES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES TO REMAIN. 4. THE REMOVAL, PRUNING, AND/OR PLANTING OF TREES IN THE PUBLIC BOULEVARD REQUIRES AN APPROVED PERMIT FROM THE CITY FORESTER. ANY WORK MUST BE COMPLETED BY A LICENSED TREE CONTRACTOR. 5. INSPECTION CONTACT: THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONTACT THE RIGHT OF WAY INSPECTOR ONE WEEK PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK TO DISCUSS TRAFFIC CONTROL, PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND COORDINATION OF ALL WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. NOTE: IF A ONE WEEK NOTICE IS NOT PROVIDED TO THE CITY, ANY RESULTING DELAYS SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 6. AS PART OF THE ROW PERMITTING PROCESS, TWO WEEKS BEFORE ANY WORK BEGINS THAT IMPACTS THE ROW IN ANY WAY THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE TO THE ROW INSPECTOR THE NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER OR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SUPERINTENDENT. IF THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED THERE MAY BE A DELAY IN OBTAINING PERMITS FOR THE WORK IN THE ROW. SAID DELAYS WILL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER 7. A FOUR-SIDED TRENCH BOX IS REQUIRED ON ALL EXCAVATIONS DEEPER THAN 5 FEET WHERE UNDERGROUND WORK OR INSPECTION IS TO BE PERFORMED BY SPRWS. FOR ALL WET TAPS TO BE PERFORMED BY SPRWS, A MINIMUM TRENCH BOX SIZE OF 8 FEET HIGH X 8 FEET WIDE X 10 FEET LONG IS REQUIRED. LADDERS ARE REQUIRED AND MUST EXTEND 3 FEET ABOVE THE SURFACE OF THE TRENCH. SIDEWALKS, PAVEMENTS, DUCTS AND APPURTENANT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE UNDERMINED UNLESS A SUPPORT SYSTEM OR ANOTHER METHOD OF PROTECTION IS PROVIDED. TRENCHES IN EXCESS OF 20 FEET IN DEPTH MUST BE SIGNED OFF BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE KEPT A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRENCH. 8. CONSTRUCTION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY: ALL WORK ON CURBS, DRIVEWAYS, AND SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY MUST BE DONE TO CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY A CONTRACTOR LICENSED TO WORK IN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNDER A PERMIT FROM PUBLIC WORKS SIDEWALK SECTION. SIDEWALK GRADES MUST BE CARRIED ACROSS DRIVEWAYS. 9. RIGHT OF WAY RESTORATION: RESTORATION OF ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PAVEMENTS ARE PERFORMED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYMENT TO THE CITY FOR THE COST OF THE RESTORATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE TO SET UP A WORK ORDER PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY REMOVALS IN THE STREET. PROCEDURES AND UNIT COSTS ARE FOUND IN STREET MAINTENANCE'S "GENERAL REQUIREMENTS -ALL RESTORATION" AND ARE AVAILABLE AT THE PERMIT OFFICE.C2-1SITE PLANRIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK PROPOSED GRAVEL SURFACE AREA PROPOSED TURF/GREEN SPACE (SEE LS PLANS) PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS COUNTY ROAD 10 1 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PER CITY STANDARDS 1 2 NEW B612 CURB AND GUTTER 3 PROPOSED BUILDING (SEE ARCH) 4 PROPOSED PRIVACY BERM 5 PROPOSED 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6 PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PARKING AREA 7 SECURED FENCED STORAGE AREA 8 PROPOSED VEGETATED SWALE WITH STAGGERED DITCH BLOCKS 9 FUTURE VEGETATED SWALE 10 SEPTIC TANK AND DRAIN FIELD LOCATION 1 (BY OTHERS) 11 SEPTIC TANK AND DRAIN FIELD AREA 2 - FUTURE (BY OTHERS) 12 ADDITIONAL BUILDING PROPOSAL - FUTURE 13 PROPOSED GRAVEL EXPANSION - FUTURE 14 PRIMARY BUILDING EXPANSION LIMIT - FUTURE 2 2 2 3 4 FUTURE EXPANSION AREAS 5 5 15 NEW 8" CONCRETE APRON AT OVERHEAD DOORS 15 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1314 16 WATER STORAGE TANKS (SEE ARCH) 17 UNDERGROUND WATER STORAGE TANK (SEE ARCH) 16 17 18 117' - 4" SDR 26 @ 1% MIN SLOPE STUB 5' FROM PROPOSED BUILDING MIN 10' BELOW GRADE 18 19 200' - 24" CULVERT .5% SLOPE INV SW = 995 INV NE = 994 19 20 2' CONCRETE RIBBON AT BITUMINOUS EDGE 20 DITCH LINE N89°43'23"E 305.00 N89°43'23"E 128.75 S89°43'23"W 36.00 N00°08'51"E 8.25 N89°43'23"E 212.25 N00°08'51"E 132.00 N89°43'23"E 1007.07 S89°43'23"W 1310.34 32.77 33.0033.001271.53 38.81 605.80S00°18'09"W 638.8095.98 99.00379.50N89°58'18"E 235.01 N01°11'13"W 259.33S00°16'37"E 10.79 N00°16'37"W 9.77 N00°08'51"E 239.25N89°43'23"E 313.76 N89°43'23"E 458.21 20.0' 50.0' 50.0'50.0'WET WET WET WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWE T WETWETWETWETWET WET WET WET W E T WETWETWETWETWE T WETWETWET WE T WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WETWET W E T WETWETWETWETWETWETWETW E T WET WETWETWETWETWE T WE T WET WET WET WETWETWE TWETWET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WET WETWETWE T W E T WE TWETWETWETWETW E T WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWE T WET WET WET WET WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETW E T WET WET WET WET WETWETFFE = 1004.2 26.0' 9.0' TYP. 18.5' TYP 26.0' 32.0' 80.0' 26.0' 100.0' FFE = 1005.5 FFE = 1003.5 1000.01005.0 1010.0 998.0999.01001.01001.01001.01002.01003.01004.0 1006.0 1007.0 1008.0 1009.0 1000.01005.01005.0 1010.0 998.0 998.0 998.0 999.0 999.0999.0 1001.0 1001.0 1002.01002.0 1003.01003.0 1003.0 1004.01004.0 1006.01007.01007.01 0 0 8 . 0 1008.01009.0995.0 993.0994.0 996.0 9 9 6 . 0 996.0 996.0 997.0 997.0 997.0 998.0998.0 995.0995.0 996.0996.0 996.0 996. 0 996.0 996.0 996.0 996.0997.0997.0997.0 997.0997.0997.0 997.0 997.0 997.0 998.0998.0998.0 998.0998.0 998.0998.0 998.0 995.0994.0 995.0 994.0 995.0 1005.0 1006.0 1007.0 1008.01009.01010.0 1011.0 1005.0 1004.0 2%1%1002.0993.0 GND 996.5 GND 996.5 995.0995.0.5% .5%.5%999.0998.0997.0998.0 997.0 996.0996.0DATE: 4.5.2021CHECKED BY: E. BeazleyDRAWN BY: A. AndersonPROJECT NO.: P21110REVISION:0PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIOND&D SERVICECORCORAN, MNCity Submittal 3.15.2021C3-1GRADING PLANTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES AND OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXCERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE SITE GRADING NOTES 1. PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR INTERVAL SHOWN AT 1 FOOT INTERVALS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINOUS GRADE. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS FOR ALL NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS. 4. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS, IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, HE SHALL HAVE MADE, AT HIS EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 5. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TBC GL TOC TOP FGPAVEMENT PAVEMENTCURB & GUTTER LEGEND Feet 1" = 40' 8040020 1 DO NOT DRIVE OVER, GRADE, OR OTHERWISE DISTURB SEPTIC FIELD AREAS. 1 1 PROPOSED GRAVEL SURFACE AREA PROPOSED TURF/GREEN SPACE (SEE LS PLANS) PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS FUTURE EXPANSION AREAS LANDSCAPE DETAILS, NOTES, AND SCHEDULES:DATE: 04.05.2021 CHECKED BY: BH DRAWN BY: MF PROJECT NO.: P21110 REVISION: PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIOND&D SERVICE CORCORAN, MN CALYX DESIGN GROUP LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 03/30/2021 Owner Requested Cost Saving RevisionsLANDSCAPE DETAILS 3L2-2DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING - SECTIONNOT TO SCALEDO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING.PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANTLEADERS, AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. SOMEINTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BEPRUNED; HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINALBUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OFTHE CROWN.FIELD STAKE TREES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECTINSTALL 6" DIA. WHITE PVC TRUNK GUARDSNO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1.MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THENURSERY, AND ROTATE TREE TO FACENORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE.SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TOGRADE OR 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWLYDRAINING SOILS.EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THETRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOTVISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THETOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL.4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OFROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY).REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND BURLAPFROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALLIF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL,CUT THE WIRE BASKET IN FOUR PLACES AND FOLD DOWN 8 IN. INTOPLANTING HOLE.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL.NOTE: FOR DIMENSIONS OF PLANTING AREAS SEEPLAN, SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE GARDEN BLENDSOIL ( EQUAL MIX OF COMPOST, SAND & SOIL ) PERNOTES.TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOTPRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT.WOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH INCONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAINTHE MULCH WEED-FREE FOR AFTERPLANTING.MULCH RING: 6 FT. DIA. MINIMUM8FT. DIA. PREFERREDNOTES:ENSURE PLANTING PITS PASS REQUIRED INFILTRATION TEST.MAINTAIN TREES PLUB AND STRAIGHT. INSTALLSUB-SURFACE ROOT BALL STAKES (TOMAHAWKOR EQUAL). DO NOT USE ABOVE-GRADE POSTSAND GUY-WIRES.SEE LANDSCAPE NOTE #30.............................................................ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLANWIDTH OF HOLE EXCAVATION SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6INCHES BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM.3'' DEPTH WATERING BASINPREPARED PLANTING SOIL BEDMULCH, PER NOTES.FINISHED GRADEPLANT ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATEDPLANTING LOCATIONS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF REDUCEDHOLE WIDTH.2L2-2TYP. SHRUB & PERENNIAL PLANTINGNOT TO SCALE1. Tree saucer for individual trees outside of a plant bed to be four inches (4") depth natural Western Red Cedar mulch for trees outside of aplant bed. Install per tree planting detail. Do not place mulch against tree trunk. Remove wire and burlap from top third of root ball before final soilback-fill and mulch.2. Refer to civil plan sheets for grading, drainage, site dimensions, survey, tree removal, proposed utilities & erosion control.3. All plant material shall comply with the latest edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock, American Association of Nurserymen.Unless noted otherwise, deciduous shrubs shall have at least 5 canes at the specified shrub height. Plant material shall be delivered asspecified.4. Plan takes precedence over plant schedule if discrepancies in quantities exist.5. All proposed plants shall be located and staked as shown.6. Adjustment in location of proposed plant material may be needed in field. Should an adjustment be required, the client will provide fieldapproval. Significant changes may require city review and approval.7. The project landscape contractor shall be held responsible for watering and properly handling all plant materials brought on the site bothbefore and after installation. Schedule plant deliveries to coincide with expected installation time within 36 hours.8. All plant materials shall be fertilized upon installation as specified.9. The landscape contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project site conditions and to plant materialgrowth requirements.10. If the landscape contractor is concerned or perceives any deficiencies in the plant selections, soil conditions, drainage or any other sitecondition that might negatively affect plant establishment, survival or guarantee, they must bring these deficiencies to the attention of thelandscape architect & client prior to bid submission. Plant bed drainage concerns during plant installation shall be brought to the attention of theOwner and General Contractor immediately.11. Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that soil and compaction conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and aroundthe building site.12. Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material until time of owner acceptance. Any acts of vandalism ordamage which may occur prior to owner acceptance shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with amaintenance program including, but not limited to, pruning, fertilization and disease/pest control.13. Warranty: The contractor shall guarantee newly planted material through one calendar year from the date of written owner acceptance.Plants that exhibit more than 20% die-back damage shall be replaced at no additional cost to the owner. The contractor shall also provideadequate tree wrap and deer/rodent protection measures for the plantings during the warranty period.14. This layout plan constitutes our understanding of the landscape requirements listed in the ordinance. Changes and modifications may berequested by the city based on applicant information, public input, council decisions, etc.15. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits and coordinating inspections as required throughout the workprocess.16. Plant size & species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field.17. The landscape contractor is to provide tree watering bags at the base of all new trees and keep filled with water for 60 days after planting.Remove tree watering bags after watering period unless otherwise directed by the Owner.18. All edger shall be professional grade black steel edger, 1/8" thickness. Anchor every 18" on-center (minimum). Submit sample.19. Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with the General Contractor, to protect the new improvements on and off-site duringlandscape work activities. Report any damage to the General Contractor immediately.20. Rock mulch areas (indicated per landscape plan) shall be 34" inch dia. local clean buff limestone over weed mat. Install per detail. Submitmulch sample for approval. All other planting areas to receive Western Red Cedar wood mulch.21. All planting and sodded areas shall be prepared prior to installation activities with a harley power box rake or equal to provide a firm plantingbed free of stones, sticks, construction debris, etc.22. All Seeding and Sodding activity shall conform to all rules and regulations as established in the MnDOT Seeding Manual, 2014 edition, forsoil preparation, installation, maintenance, acceptability, timing, and warranty.23. The Landscape Contractor shall furnish samples of all landscape materials for approval prior to installation.24. The Landscape Contractor shall clear and grub the underbrush from within the work limits to remove dead branches, leaves, trash, weedsand foreign materials.25. The landscape contractor shall contact Gopher State One Call no less than 48 hours before digging for field utility locations.26. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for the removal of erosion control measures once vegetation has been established to thesatisfaction of the municipal staff. This includes silt curtain fencing and sediment logs placed in the landscape.27. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for visiting the site to become familiar with the conditions prior to bidding and installation.Coordinate with the general contractors on matters such as fine grading, landscaped area conditions, staging areas, irrigation connection tobuilding, etc.28. See Site and Civil plans for additional information regarding the project, including infiltration area soils and sub-surface drainagerequirements and performance.29. Topsoil Requirements: All graded areas of the site that are designated on the plan set for turf sod shall have no less than 6" of imported topsoil, areas designated for shrubs, trees, and perennials shall have no less than 12" of imported top soil, meeting MnDOT classifications forplanting soil for trees, shrubs, and turf. Slope away from building.30. Landscape contractor must prove the open sub-grade of all planting areas after their excavation is capable of infiltrating a minimumrequirement of 1/4-inch of water per hour prior to installation of plant materials, topsoil, irrigation, weed mat, and mulch. Planting areas notcapable of meeting this requirement shall have 4" diameter X 48" depth holes augured every 36" on-center and filled with MnDOT Free-DrainingCoarse Filter Aggregate. Re-test sub-grade percolation for compliance to infiltration minimum requirement.31. Landscape contractor to provide nursery pull list (bill of lading) including plant species and sizes shipped to the site. Additionally, thelandscape contractor shall provide nursery stock traceability, proving none of the materials provided contain or are genetic strains of theneonicotinoid family including acetamiprid, clothianidin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, nithiazine, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam.32.Retaining wall engineering by others. Unless otherwise noted, retaining wall block to be County Materials Co., County Block, Split-Face inBuff. Submit engineered wall drawings to Civil Engineer for review and approval. Include cap blocks and pre-manufactured corner units ofmatching finish and color. Install per manufacturer's guidelines.Landscape Notes and Requirements:1'-6" (MIN.)4"FACE OF WALL OR BACK OF CURB.MULCH PER LANDSCAPE NOTES.EDGER PER LANDSCAPE NOTES.3 OZ. NEEDLE-PUNCH FILTER FABRIC, TURN-UPFINISHED GRADEPITCH SUB-GRADE TO DRAIN AWAYFROM BUILDING WALLS & CURBS.NOTES: SEE PLAN FOR CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION.PLANT BED WIDTH VARIES, SEE PLAN.AT EDGES, OVERLAP SEAMS 4".SEE PLANSWIDTHS MAY VARYSUBMIT ROCK, EDGER, AND FABRIC SAMPLES FOR APPROVAL.1L2-2PLANT BED AND EDGE DETAILNOT TO SCALEL2-2 TOMAHAWK TREE STABILIZER STAKES.MINIMUM (2) PER TREE.SODROOT BALL TO SIT ON MOUNDEDMULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE SPEC.PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC.TOPSOILSUBGRADEOTHERWISE. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED PLACE ROOT BALL SO THAT BASALFLARE IS 1" ABOVE SURROUNDINGCONTACT WITH TRUNK.NOTE: SUBGRADE, REMOVE BURLAPDRAIN SYSTEM IS NECESSARY4" DIAMETER AUGERED HOLE, 42" MIN. DEPTH. FILLED W/ 3/4" DIAMETER DRAIN ROCK. COVER W/ 6" FILTER FABRIC.FOR HEAVY CLAY SOILS.FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALLGRADE.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORENSURING THE TREES ARE IN A PLUMBPOSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD.TREE HEIGHT MEASURED FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL TO BASE OF CENTRAL LEADER.Native Seeding Schedule:Native Seed in Upland areas shall be:MnDOT #35-221 Dry Prairie General, seeded into the topsoil layer at 50.00 lbs per acre.Submit seed mix for approval. Grading and Erosion Control per Civil Plans and Specifications.Add an additional 20.00 lbs per acre of MnDOT #21-111 Oats Cover Crop to mix below.4L2-2CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING - SECTIONNOT TO SCALEEVERGREEN TREESCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERQTYREMARKSPd Picea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce6` Hgt. B&B20OVERSTORY TREECODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERQTYREMARKSAn Acer rubrum `Northwood`Northwood Maple2.5" Cal. B&B9Co Celtis occidentalisCommon Hackberry2.5" Cal. B&B6Gi Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Skycole` TM Skyline Thornless Honey Locust 2.5" Cal. B&B9Gd Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`Kentucky Coffeetree2.5" Cal. B&B9Ov2 Ostrya virginianaIronwood2.5" Cal. B&B8Qb Quercus bicolorSwamp White Oak2.5" Cal. B&B13SHRUBSCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERQTYREMARKSAm Aronia melanocarpa `Morton` TMIroquis Beauty Black Chokeberry 5 gal. Pot36Bg2 Berberis thunbergii `Goruzam`Golden Ruby Barberry3 gal. Pot32Cr Cornus alba `Regnzam`Red Gnome Dogwood3 gal. Pot29Dl Diervilla loniceraDwarf Bush Honeysuckle3 gal. Pot15Vb Viburnum trilobum `Bailey Compact` Compact American Cranberry Bush 5 gal. Pot20PLANT SCHEDULE1. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions.2. Contractor to coordinate any work in the city right-of-way with City of Corcoran Public Works Department.3. Expose root flare and set at-grade.4. The contractor is responsible to maintain trees in a plumb position throughout the maintenance period.6. Protect existing trees to remain during construction.7. Refer to Sheet L2-1 for Landscape Plan.8. Refer to Sheet L2-3 for Tree Preservation Plan.General Notes:Low Maintenance 'No-Mow' Seeding Schedule:Low Maintenance Seed in designated areas shall be:MnDOT #25-131 Low Maintenance Turf, seeded into the topsoil layer at 220.00 lbs per acre.Submit seed mix for approval. Grading and Erosion Control per Civil Plans and Specifications.Add an additional 10.00 lbs per acre of MnDOT #21-111 Oats Cover Crop to mix below.MnDOT Seed Installation Timelines:NATIVE SEEDING INSTALLATION METHOD:Drop Seeding Onto Tilled SitesThis is the "standard" method for seeding on prepared sites such as those onconstruction projects.a) Site Preparation: The site should be prepared by loosening topsoil to aminimum depth of 3 inches.b) Fertilizer: Use a fertilizer analysis based on a soil test or a generalrecommendation is a 10-10-10 (NPK) commercial grade analysis at 200lbs/acre.c) Seed Installation: Seed should be installed with a drop seeder that willaccurately meter the types of seed to be planted, keep all seedsuniformly mixed during the seeding and contain drop seed tubes forseed placement (Brillion-type). The drop seeder should be equippedwith a cultipacker assembly to ensure seed-to-soil contact.d) Seeding Rates: Rates are specified in the mixture tabulation for thespecified mix.e) Packing: If the drop seeder is not equipped with a cultipacker, the siteshould be cultipacked following the seeding to ensure seed-to-soilcontact.f) Mulch: Cover soil with a hydromulch consisting of natural wood fiber orpaper fiber, water, and M-Binder at 100 lbs per acre.NATIVE SEED REQUIRED MAINTENANCE - 3 YRS:Native Grass and Forb Mixtures (mixtures beginning with the number 3)Year 1Establishment (spring seeding):1) Prepare site - Late April - May2) Seed - May 1 - June 1Maintenance:1) Mow (6-8 inches) - every 30 days after planting until September 30.2) Weed Control - mowing should help control annual weeds. Spot spraythistles, etc.Establishment (fall seeding):1) Prepare site - Late August - early September2) Seed - late September to freeze-upMaintenance (following season):1) Mow (6-8 inches) - once in May, June, and July2) Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spraythistles, etc.Evaluation:1) Cover crop growing within 2 weeks of planting (except dormantplantings).2) Seedlings spaced 1-6 inches apart in drill rows.3) Native grass seedlings may only be 4-6 inches tall.4) If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow as necessary.Year 2Maintenance:1) Mow (6-8 inches) one time between June 1 - August 15 before weedsset seed.2) Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spraythistles, etc.3) Some sites may not require much maintenance the second year.Evaluation:1) Cover crop will be gone unless winter wheat was used in a fall planting.2) Grasses forming clumps 1-6 inches apart in drill rows, but still short.3) Some flowers should be blooming (black-eyed Susans, bergamot, etc.).4) If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow site.Year 3Maintenance:1) Mow only if necessary.2) Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc.3) Sites usually do not require much maintenance the third year.Evaluation:1) Planting should begin looking like a prairie - tall grasses, flowers, etc.Long-termMaintenance:1) Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc.2) Burning (3-5 year rotation) alternate spring and fall if possible.3) Haying (3-5 year rotation) late summer or early fall. Alternate withburning (may substitute for burning).4) Burning two years in a row will really "clean up" rough-looking sites. Page M of 1Project #:Date:4/5/2021Calculated light levels shown areestimates based on informationavailable at time of layout request.Due to unknown site conditionsJTH Lighting assumes no responsibilityfor installed light levels.1. Lighting Reflectance of 80/50/20 used unless noted otherwise2. Interior calc points shown at 30" A.F.F. unless noted otherwise3. Exterior calc points shown at grade unless noted otherwise4. Emergency egress calc points shown at 0" A.F.F.5. Photometric drawings are for Design purposes only, not for Construction documentsPaper Size: ARCH D - 24X36"MN, ND, SD, W. WI6885 146TH ST WAPPLE VALLEY, MN 55124952.223.6300WWW.JTHLIGHTING.COMCORCORAN PRJCTCORCORAN MNLuminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyLabelManufacturerDescriptionArrangementLum. LumensLum. WattsLLFCalculation Summary2WP1RWL1-48L-45-4K7-3-USINGLE578446.50.9506WP2RWL2-160L-80-4K7-4-USINGLE1113780.80.950LabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinBUILDING_1_PlanarIlluminanceFc1.319.70.0N.A.N.A.4AA3RAR-2-320L-140-4K7-3-BCSINGLE114301330.9502AA4RAR-2-320L-140-4K7-4W-BCSINGLE106801330.9501AA5-2RAR-2-480L-240-4K7-3-BCBACK-BACK18910226.90.9501WP3RWL1-48L-45-4K7-4W-USINGLE570446.50.950Not to Scale101020.0'50.0'50.0'50.0'EXISTING WETLANDSEXISTING WETLANDSEXISTING WETLANDSEXISTING WETLANDSEXISTING WETLANDS136FFE = 1004.226.0'9.0' TYP.18.5' TYP26.0'32.0'80.0'26.0'P1P2P3100.0'P4FFE = 1005.5FFE = 1003.51000.01005.01010.0998.0999.01001.01001.01001.01002.01003.01004.01006.01007.01008.01009.01000.01005.01005.01010.0998.0998.0998.0999.0999.0999.01 0 0 1 .0 1001.01001.01001.01002.01002.01003.01003.01003.01004.01004.01006.01006.01007.01007.01 0 0 8 .0 1008.01009.01009.0995.0993.0994.0996.09 9 6 .0 996.0996.0997.0997.0997.0998.0998.0995.0996.0996.0996.0996.0996.0996.0996.0996.0997.0997.0997.0997.0997.0997.0997.0997.0997.09 9 8 .0998.0998.0998.0998.0998.0998.0998.0995.0994.0995.0994.0995.01005.01006.01007.01008.01009.01010.01011.01005.01004.02%%%1%%%1002.0993.0GND 996.5GND 996.5995.0995.0.5%%%.5%%%.5%%%999.0998.0997.0998.0997.0996.0996.0P40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.10.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.7 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.20.2 0.3 0.7 1.4 2.6 3.6 4.2 5.0 5.1 4.8 4.9 5.1 4.4 3.7 2.9 1.8 0.9 0.4 0.20.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 2.4 3.5 4.4 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.8 5.0 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.8 0.8 0.4 0.20.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.6 2.2 2.7 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.0 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.10.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 2.1 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.0 2.2 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.10.2 0.3 0.7 1.5 2.7 3.8 4.6 5.4 5.4 5.1 5.2 5.4 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.8 0.8 0.4 0.20.2 0.4 0.7 1.3 2.3 3.1 3.6 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.5 3.9 3.4 2.7 1.6 0.8 0.4 0.20.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.20.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 3.5 5.6 5.3 5.6 5.2 4.3 5.8 5.4 5.6 5.2 2.1 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.4 1.3 3.3 7.2 9.3 8.6 9.2 7.6 6.0 9.1 8.6 9.0 9.4 4.5 1.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.5 2.4 6.9 9.7 4.4 2.8 3.3 3.0 2.7 3.5 2.7 3.3 9.5 7.9 3.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.00.1 0.1 0.5 2.5 7.0 7.86.9 7.4 3.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.00.1 0.2 0.6 2.6 7.0 7.96.9 7.4 3.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 3.0 7.6 8.58.0 8.0 3.5 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 3.1 6.6 7.26.8 6.9 3.6 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 3.0 7.8 8.98.1 8.4 3.6 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 2.9 7.3 8.07.0 7.9 3.5 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.20.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.1 3.4 8.4 9.18.8 9.5 4.1 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.30.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 2.1 4.4 8.7 8.89.1 9.0 4.2 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.1 0.60.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.9 4.1 5.9 6.25.3 5.4 2.9 1.9 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 1.5 0.70.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.4 5.2 5.64.1 4.4 2.3 1.6 2.1 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.1 1.4 0.80.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.9 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.5 4.6 5.13.9 3.7 1.8 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.60.2 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.5 1.2 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.4 1.2 3.2 4.22.2 2.4 1.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.10.1 0.3 0.8 1.6 2.2 2.5 1.9 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.8 2.1 2.2 0.8 1.7 3.2 3.8 3.7 3.0 1.4 0.5 1.0 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.2 0.6 1.4 2.2 2.7 3.0 2.0 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.6 1.4 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.2 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.4 2.4 3.1 3.0 2.2 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.3 2.2 2.8 3.1 2.9 2.1 1.0 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.7 3.2 3.0 2.3 1.3 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 2.6 2.1 1.5 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.5 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.9 1.4 1.5 2.0 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.8 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.6 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.6 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.1 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.2 1.0 1.8 1.7 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 1.4 2.4 2.2 1.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 1.6 2.8 2.5 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 1.5 3.1 2.9 1.5 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.2 0.3 1.2 2.9 2.9 1.5 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.2 0.4 1.1 2.8 2.8 1.5 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.2 0.3 1.2 3.0 2.9 1.5 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.2 1.5 3.1 2.8 1.5 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.2 1.6 2.8 2.4 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.2 1.3 2.3 2.1 1.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.9 1.6 1.6 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 7j. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: May 20, 2021 for the May 27, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for T Scherber Demolition and Excavating at 23240 County Road 30 (PID 07-119-23-13-0003) (city file no. 21-007) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:July 9, 2021 1.Application Request The applicant has requested approval of a site plan and a conditional use permit to allow a contractor’s operation with outside storage on this 9.46-acre site. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this item at a Public Hearing at their May 6th meeting. Other than the applicant, there was no one present to speak on this item. The applicant asked the Planning Commission to waive the paving requirements and some of the screening requirements for this site. Staff noted that paving is required by ordinance and can only be waived by a variance; however, the City does have some discretion in reviewing how much landscaping/fencing will be required to screen the site. After some discussion, the Planning Commission voted 3-0 to recommend approval with the conditions in the draft resolution. 3.Context Background In 1996, the City Council approved a conditional home occupation (Resolution 1996-39) to allow contractor storage inside the accessory building. On April 25, 2013, the City Council approved a conditional use permit amendment to allow the landowner to rent that same building to another business for storage (Resolution 2013-20). This CUP was very limited in scope and cannot be modified for this business use. A new CUP is required for T. Scherber. The City Council approved a rezoning from Transitional Rural Commercial (TCR) to Rural Commercial (CR) on December 21, 2020. T Scherber CUP and Site Plan (21-007) 2 May 27, 2021 The item was originally scheduled for the April 1st Planning Commission meeting, but the applicant requested that it be tabled to the May 6th meeting to allow them to meet with engineering to try to address some of their comments. Zoning and Land Use The site is guided Rural Service/Commercial and zoned CR. The site has an existing home, which is currently being remodeled for office space and several accessory buildings that will be used by the new business. Surrounding Properties The property to the north, east and south and west are guided Rural Service/Commercial and zoned TCR to the north and east and TCR and CR to the south. The property to the west, across County Road 116, is guided Rural/Ag Residential and is zoned Rural Residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site This is a developed parcel and there are no natural resources identified in the Comprehensive Plan. There are existing trees on the west portion of the site that are proposed be preserved. 4. Analysis of Request A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a site plan is limited to whether or not the plan meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the site plan. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed request meets the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. Site Plan The request is for approval of a site plan and a conditional use permit to allow “Contractors Operations, including accessory outside storage” in the CR zoning district. The business includes two separate operations: 1) a demolition and excavating contractor and 2) a roll-off and hauling service. The core business hours are Monday – Friday from 6:30 am to 6:00 pm (office hours are 7:00 am to 4:00 pm). No new buildings are proposed to be constructed, but the northern most building and the existing garage will be removed. The existing home is being remodeled for an office, Shed 1 will be used for pick-up trucks and supplies and Shed 2 will be used as a maintenance facility as well as equipment and truck storage. T Scherber CUP and Site Plan (21-007) 3 May 27, 2021 This site would allow them to consolidate their Rogers, Corcoran and Medina locations in to this single new facility. The outdoor storage area shown behind the sheds will be used for materials and equipment and is much larger than the area needed to store the items indicated in the applicant’s narrative. The applicant indicates that this would allow for future expansion of the storage area. However, because the plans show the entire storage area today screening and stormwater management must address the submitted plans. Lot Analysis This is an existing lot of record with existing buildings. The existing home that is being remodeled as an office is a legal, non-conforming structure. It is non-conforming because the front yard setback is 78.6 feet where 100 feet is required from CR 30. The structure is allowed to remain at this setback, but cannot further reduce the setback. The proposed site would have a total impervious surface coverage of 27.6% where a maximum of 50% is permitted in the CR district. Parking The plans show a nine stall aggregate parking area near the office, which complies with the number of stalls required for the office. However, Section 1060.060 of the Zoning Ordinance requires all parking and drive areas to have a perimeter of poured, cast in place concrete curb and be surfaced with asphalt or concrete. The ordinance only provides an exemption for seasonal businesses in the CR district that operate less than nine months per year. Therefore, the City has included a condition that parking lot and the area outside of the defined storage areas be paved with curb and gutter (see the blue outline on the graphic to the right). This requirement cannot be waived except by variance or a zoning ordinance amendment. Streets/Access Hennepin County has reviewed the application and requests that the west access onto County Road 30 be removed and that the access be paved (to avoid tracking onto the County Road). The site has two existing accesses onto County Road 30. The City Engineer has indicated that the two curb cuts can remain as is, but if they are modified they must comply with the curb cut width and radius limits of the City Design Standards. The applicant’s plans do show removal of the western driveway as recommended by the County and show a paved access from County Road 30 the eastern shed. As noted previously, additional areas in front of the buildings/screening fence must be paved. T Scherber CUP and Site Plan (21-007) 4 May 27, 2021 Landscaping The applicant’s landscape plan includes 24 coniferous and 6 deciduous trees plus 5 shrubs. The ordinance requires one overstory tree per 1,000 square feet of gross building floor area or one tree per 50 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater and one understory shrub for each 300 square feet of building or one tree per 30 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. In this case: a. The site perimeter is 2,782 feet, which would require 56 overstory trees and 93 shrubs. b. Staff estimates the building area as 9,000 sq. ft., which would require 9 trees and 30 shrubs. The applicant would be required to provide 26 additional overstory trees and 88 additional understory shrubs or the equivalent to meet basic requirements. These additional trees can be used to meet the outside storage screening requirements discussed below. Outside Storage The applicant indicates that they will generally have equipment out on site and will bring equipment back for maintenance and storage. There will be dumpsters on site, but they also have a separate storage site in Shakopee. The applicant has stated that employees will park in the shed. The new outside storage area behind the sheds is approximately 1.7 acres in size (250 ft x 300 ft). The area is proposed to be aggregate surface. The City has required storage areas to meet the minimum parking setbacks for the district. The proposed use complies. The Zoning Ordinance requires all exterior storage shall be located in the rear or side yard and be screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties and public streets. The applicant is showing a six-foot high, 48-foot wide metal sheeting fence between Shed 2 and the east property line. There is no other screening of the storage area from the south proposed. Staff recommends that a fence be provided along south edge of the storage area to provide screening from County Road 30 as required by ordinance. Typically, industrial users like this have used chain link fence with slats to provide the screening, which works well for use with a gate between Shed 1 and 2, but other materials could be used. This is similar to what would be found at Satellite Shelters (20050 75th Avenue), Blocks N Rocks (20010 75th Avenue) and Randall Construction (7241 County Road 116) where a screen fence encloses the entire storage area. Section 1060.060 of the City Code notes that planting screens are the preferred method of screening and the planting screen shall consist of hardy trees that will provide a minimum of 80 percent opacity year- round. Planting screens shall contain a mix of overstory and understory plantings and a mix of deciduous and coniferous materials. It also states that fences or walls may be used in conjunction with landscaping to provide screening. When required for screening, minimum of 80 percent opacity shall be provided. This typically requires a double row of conifers or a mix of landscaping and fencing. T Scherber CUP and Site Plan (21-007) 5 May 27, 2021 The plans show a mix of coniferous and deciduous trees on the east and west side of the storage areas, but no landscaping on the north. The proposed trees are planted approximately 20 feet on center, which is acceptable for typical landscaping but doesn’t appear adequate to screen the outside storage area. The City requires the screening out outside storage areas for two reasons: a. To screen the outside storage from public streets and adjacent uses and b. To control the outside storage area, so they do not expand without City approval. Screening must be added at the north side of the storage area. If the additional 26 overstory tree and 88 shrubs are provided around the east, north and west boundaries of the outside storage area and the screen fence on the south, the screening may be addressed, but the applicant would need to revise the plans to ensure compliance. • The City Council should discuss whether the proposed landscaping provides adequate screening of the storage area if landscaping similar to what is proposed on the east and west is provided on the north. This is the recommendation from the Planning Commission and is included in the draft resolution. • If not, the City Council could recommend additional conifers to be added with a staggered row planting or that a screening fence be added on the north, east and west sides of the storage area in addition to the fencing required to be added on the south. Wetlands The applicant completed a wetland delineation for the site and received a Notice of Decision stating that there are no regulated wetlands on site. Utilities The site will be served by the exiting well and septic. Lighting The applicant is not proposing any new lighting on the site. Any new lighting must comply with Section 1060.040 lighting standards. Parks and Trails The Comprehensive Plan shows the existing County Road 19 off-road trail and the plans show the easement on this property. No subdivision is proposed; therefore, park dedication is not required. T Scherber CUP and Site Plan (21-007) 6 May 27, 2021 Stormwater Management The plans propose using the existing tile system for stormwater management. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and notes that additional information for offsite tile is necessary. A separate pond/basin is required for the disturbed/developed area and the existing tile shall be routed around the new basin to prevent impact of neighboring properties. The applicant must obtain permission/acknowledgement of the off-site drain tile maintenance/repair that may be required. Compliance with the City Engineer’s memo has been included as a condition of approval in the draft resolution. Sound Source Plan The applicant’s narrative notes that their equipment will comply with city noise standards and equipment will be upgraded with a white noise back-alarm. A. Conditional Use Permit The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow “Contractors Operations, including accessory outside storage”. The intent of the district is to “provide a mix of neighborhood commercial uses and rural industrial, such as contractor’s yards and similar uses that do not require municipal water or sanitary sewer services”. This district is home to number of similar Corcoran businesses including Ebert Construction, Ess Brothers and Sons Inc. and Doboszenski & Sons. Section 1040.090, Subd. 4 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the landowner to request a CUP if they comply with the Conditional Use Permit standards in Section 1070.020 of the Zoning Ordinance. Specifically: A. Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed use is consistent with uses anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan and does not impact the public facilities or capital improvement plans. The Comprehensive Plan states: “This area is intended to continue as a rural service area with commercial uses that may be maintained utilizing individual septic systems or approved alternative systems. This area is not expected to have public sanitary sewer and water service within the 2040 planning period. This area will have less strict building and site development standards than other commercial areas to allow for contractors’ yards and similar uses. The area can provide a relocation opportunity within the City for businesses that would not typically locate in high land-value areas. Zoning regulations will be developed to address the minimum design standards and specific screening requirements for this unique land use.” T Scherber CUP and Site Plan (21-007) 7 May 27, 2021 This business would also address Goal 2, Policy 2 of the Economic Competitiveness chapter of Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to recruit new businesses in appropriate locations. B. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community if the conditions of approval are met. The use is allowed within the CR district. C. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The new business is a conditional use in the CR district and conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with ordinance standards. D. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. This is the type of business that the City anticipated when the CR district was created. E. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Municipal sewer and water are not available to the site, but private utilities would be provided. F. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. G. The conditional use and site conforms to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. T Scherber CUP and Site Plan (21-007) 8 May 27, 2021 5. Conclusions Staff has reviewed the plans with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Zoning Plan and Zoning Ordinance and finds that the standards for a site plan and CUP to allow the development have been met. The proposed use is the type of use long envisioned for this area of the City and staff has included conditions to address outstanding issues. The conditions may result in changes to the site plan, but staff believes the issues can be resolved to move forward with the development. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2021-50 approving the site plan and conditional use permit, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Attachments 1. Resolution 2021-50 approving Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit 2. Site Location Map 3. Engineer’s memo dated April 26, 2021 4. Hennepin County comments dated March 17, 2021 5. Applicant’s Narrative received March 22, 2021 6. Supplement to narrative received April 28, 2021 7. T.Scherber booklet received March 11, 2021 8. Civil Plans dated April 20, 2021 City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-50 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 23240 COUNTY ROAD 30 (PID 07-119-23-13-0003) (CITY FILE NO. 21-007) WHEREAS, T Scherber Demolition and Excavating (“the applicant”) is requesting approval of a site plan and conditional use permit to allow a contractor’s yard with outside storage in the CR (rural commercial) district on property legally described as follows: Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan and conditional use permit at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A site plan and conditional use permit are approved to allow for the construction of a building addition as shown on application and plans received by the City on February 9, 2021, and additional information received on March 11, 2021, March 22, 2021 and April 20, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The applicant must comply with the City Engineer’s memo dated April 26, 2021. 3. A conditional use permit is approved to allow for contractor’s yard with outside storage, subject to the finding that the applicable criteria in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance have been met. Specifically; a. The proposed use is consistent with uses anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan and does not impact the public facilities or capital improvement plans. The Comprehensive Plan states: “This area is intended to continue as a rural service area with commercial uses that may be maintained utilizing individual septic systems or approved alternative systems. This area is not expected to have public sanitary sewer and water service within the 2040 planning period. This area will have less strict building and site development standards than other commercial areas to allow for contractors’ yards and similar uses. The area can provide a relocation opportunity within the City for businesses that would not typically locate in high land-value areas. Zoning regulations will be developed to address the minimum design standards and specific screening requirements for this unique land use.” City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-50 Page 2 of 5 This business would also address Goal 2, Policy 2 of the Economic Competitiveness chapter of Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to recruit new businesses in appropriate locations. b. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community if the conditions of approval are met. The use is allowed within the CR district. c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The new business is a conditional use in the CR district and conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with ordinance standards. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. This is the type of business that the City anticipated when the CR district was created. e. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Municipal sewer and water are not available to the site, but private utilities would be provided. f. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. g. The conditional use generally conforms to performance standards as specified by this Chapter and the has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. 4. The parking and access area between County Road 30 and the outside storage area (generally the area in front of the sheds/screen fence) must be paved. Concrete curb is required. 5. A revised stormwater management plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. 6. The outside storage area must be screened from public streets and adjacent property to a height of six feet with a minimum opacity of 80% a. The plans must be revised to show how this screening will be provided and submitted for City review and approval. b. Landscaping, fencing or a combination shall be provided to provide the required screening from the south, north, east and west. c. Fencing shall be added to screen the outside storage area and provide the boundary between the paved area and the gravel storage areas. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-50 Page 3 of 5 7. The applicant shall provide additional fence details for review and approval by the City. a. Material and dimension details should be provided for any planned fencing. b. Fencing over seven feet high will require a building permit. 8. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to show the following as required by Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance: a. An additional 26 overstory trees and 93 shrubs must be provided to meet the minimum of ordinance standards. 9. Drainage and utility easements (if required) must be provided to the city in recordable form for review and approval by the City Attorney. 10. The developer shall enter into a site improvement agreement and submit a financial guarantee for the proposed work as outlined in Section 1070.050, Subd. 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 11. All signage must comply with ordinance standards. All signs require a permit in order to be constructed and will be reviewed at the time of permit submittal. 12. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to beginning site work: a. The applicant shall submit any and all necessary permits to the watershed and receive approval and shall provide proof of permits to the City. b. Record the approving resolution and required easements at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 13. FURTHER, any request to inspect the required landscaping in order to reduce financial guarantees must be accompanied by recertification/verification of field inspection by the project landscape architect. A letter signed by the project landscape architect verifying plantings have been corrected and is in compliance with the plans and specifications will suffice. 14. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use and completes the required improvements. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-50 Page 4 of 5 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of May 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-50 Page 5 of 5 Attachment A The South 761.52 feet of the West 629.18 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota Hennepin County Property Map Date: 3/22/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 400 feet PARCEL ID: 0711923130003 OWNER NAME: County Road 19 Holdings Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 23240 Co Rd No 30, Corcoran MN 55374 PARCEL AREA: 9.45 acres, 411,734 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: SALE DATA: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $418,000 TAX TOTAL: $5,802.74 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $433,000 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Project: T. Scherber Demo and Excavating Date: April 26, 2021 Exhibits: This memorandum is based on a review of the plans with revisions dated 4/19/2021 by Civil Engineering Site Design. Comments: General: 1. Consistent with the review process, a response letter shall be provided in response to the following comments provided in this Memorandum in which the applicant provides a written response to each item. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per reviews, the project is subject to additional planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. 3. Wetland delineation was performed and it was determined according to WCA that no regulated wetlands exist on site. 4. Stormwater management plan is required to receive City authorization prior to submitting to the Elm Creek WMO. Driveways Two driveway accesses currently exist. 1. County regulates access. 2. One access is shown as being improved with bituminous to Existing Shed #2. 3. Second access is shown as being removed. Gravel Areas Gravel Areas are acceptable with City Engineer approval. For this site the requirements are similar to other rural commercial sites. 1. Bituminous required for entrances and parking. Additional bituminous is needed. 2. Curbing is required, a ribbon curb is acceptable. April 2021 D&D Preliminary Plan Review Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 Tile and Ponding The plans show drainage to the northeast, inflow from the west, a significant tile system with offsite discharge. Proposed conditions show utilizing the existing tile system. 1. Information for offsite tile is necessary. This includes discharge location, condition, diameter, etc. The adjacent parcel to the north is same landowner (County tax records) and the City can assist with coordinating access for the second parcel to the north if needed. 2. A separate pond/basin is required for the disturbed/developed area. a. Basin may be constructed in same area with a separate OCS connecting to existing tile if sufficient downstream information is provided along with providing easement or agreement for access for maintenance and repairs. b. Capacity analysis of the discharge tile is necessary to support site design. c. Overland EOF elevations shall be shown and offsite route identified. Easement or agreement for access shall be provided. d. City prefers a NURP pond with filtration shelf to meet the WMO water quality rules (if required). 3. Tile entering the property shall be routed around the new basin to prevent impact of neighboring properties. a. Existing onsite tile shall be removed or plugged. 4. Tile information shall be placed on a separate sheet with inverts, material, diameter and any other known features clearly shown. “Potholing” of existing tile may be necessary to obtain information. a. Identify the open 12-inch intake as shown in wetland report. 5. Show drainage and utility easements over all stormwater BMPs, tile, discharge routes, etc. Modeling City Modeling Guidelines are attached and a few items of note; 1. Use B soils in calculating composite CN for L44A map units. 2. No exfiltration allowed in modeling. 3. Use CN 98 for gravel and impervious areas. 4. The revised site design (as noted previously) will be reviewed with an updated model. 5. Updated site design will allow further review of flow rates to CR 30 ditch and conveyance capacity of the ditch. Offsite Acknowledgement 1. Offsite permission/acknowledgement of drainage into tile and access rights for maintenance and repair are required. End of Comments From:Jason D Gottfried To:Natalie Davis; Michael Pritchard; Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Kevin Mattson Cc:Ashley Morello; mgottschalk@ci.corcoran.mn.us; rburns@ci.corcoran.mn.us; Kent Torve; Matthew A Bolterman Subject:RE: [External] Distribution #21-007 Scherber Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit Date:Wednesday, March 17, 2021 7:16:39 AM Hello all, Our plat review committee discussed this proposal yesterday (03/16), and recommend thefollowing considerations in your team’s review:Recommend single access point at southeast corner of site (remove westerly wraparounddriveway)With potential for more significant intersection control (CSAH’s 30, 19) in the future(forecasted ADT growth, crash history, etc) need to plan for this to be single accesspoint for any and all further subdivision/redevelopment as well (industrial park) thatmight occur at the cotnerPlan for internal street connectivity guided to this single access pointGravel/rock driveway should be paved (need to avoid tracking onto county road) · Right-of-way needs will need to be further studied should they re-plat in future Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Please let me know if I can clarify anyfurther, or you would like to discuss in detail Jason Jason Gottfried Transportation Planner Transportation Planning Office: 612-596-0394 Cell: 612-719-8073jason.gottfried@hennepin.usHennepin County Public Works1600 Prairie DriveMedina, MN 55340(working remotely) From: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:32 AM To: Michael Pritchard <MPritchard@corcoranmn.gov>; Kendra Lindahl <klindahl@landform.net>; Kevin Mattson <kmattson@ci.corcoran.mn.us>; mgottschalk@ci.corcoran.mn.us; rburns@ci.corcoran.mn.us; Kent Torve <ktorve@wenck.com>; Matthew A Bolterman <Matthew.Bolterman@hennepin.us>; Jason D Gottfried <Jason.Gottfried@hennepin.us> Cc: Ashley Morello <Ashley.Morello@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Distribution #21-007 Scherber Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit Please find attached the plans and narrative for T Scherber’s Site Plan & Conditional Use Permit request. This project is scheduled for Planning Commission review on April 1, 2021. We ask that you please provide comments no later than March 22, 2021. Thank you, Natalie Davis Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 www.ci.corcoran.mn.us ndavis@corcoranmn.gov Direct: 763-258-4272 Main: 763-420-2288 City of Corcoran - A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message from your computer system. Project Narrative T Scherber Demolition and Excavating Amendment to Conditional Use Permit We are submitting an application for a new Conditional Use Permit for the property located at 23240 County Road 30, Corcoran, Minnesota. The existing CUP allows for home occupation with contractor’s storage inside existing accessory buildings on the property. The existing CUP restrictions include: • Outside storage of any vehicles, equipment of supplies shall not be allowed. • No exterior parking for employees. There is an exception for parking in the accessory building during operating hours. • Any changes to the site that relate to the commercial operation shall require a rezoning Rural Commercial (CR), site plan approval, and any other permits as required. REQUEST We are requesting a new CUP to transition this property to a contractor's yard with both indoor and outdoor storage including employee parking, similar to neighboring business’s (Doboszenski, Ess, Ebert, Corcoran Public Works Building). It is our understanding that our intended use for the property is in line with what the city has in mind for this area. The property would not be open to the general public. INTRODUCTION Before we define the nature of our request we felt it was important to introduce ourselves and our business to you. We have attached a brochure that goes through our experience, our mission and values, and some of the work we have done and recognition we have received. Through Quality Work, high safety standards, and a clean site presence we have earned the trust of top contractors in the area. Our goal is to apply the same principles we maintain on the job-site at our new headquarters and to become outstanding citizens in the City of Corcoran with a reputation of cleanliness and compliance. ABOUT OUR BUSINESS & OPERATIONS Currently, we operate from three locations; at a Rogers location we store trucks and job materials, at our Medina location we have an outdoor storage space for 3-5 dumpsters, and we lease an office space in Corcoran with 3 office spaces. Our goal is to relocate all operations (offices, materials, trucks and equipment) to this location. We are a full service demolition & excavating contractor and we also provide roll-off and hauling services in the residential, commercial, and public sector. We are open Monday - Friday. Our yard hours of operation are 6:30am - 6 pm. Office hours 7am - 4pm. We have 8 staff members. 3 Drivers, 2 Operators, 1 laborer, 2 office staff.. Our team is extremely experienced in their respective roles and maintain a clean driving and OSHA record in order to work with us. Each staff member takes personal responsibility for the cleanliness of their trucks and the machines they run. Our fleet consists of 2 Roll-Off Trucks, 1 QUAD, 4 Excavators, 3 Bobcats, 3 Pickup trucks. Our trucks typically are idling at 6am and leaving the property at 6:30am. The trucks return between 4 and 7pm.SOUND CONTROL PLAN: we will be operating all equipment and trucks within city noise ordinance and upgrade all equipment to white noise back-up alarm. The machines are typically always out on a job-site and transported directly from one job-site to the next. Occasionally we will bring equipment back to our yard for general maintenance or storage. Additionally We have 75 dumpsters that are typically always on a job-site and when not in use are stored at Dem-Con Landfill in Shakopee. For logistical reasons we do try to keep a few empty dumpsters at our yard. PROPERTY REZONE AND IMPROVEMENTS The property was recently re-zoned to Rural Commercial “CR” in December 2020. Our proposed use of the land and existing buildings is compatible with CR zoning of the property as it provides for contractor’s operations as a conditional use. Our improvements to the site will occur over time and we will submit separate applications for site improvements with site modification details. Initial site improvements are indicated on Site Plans dated 03/10/2021 showing the following: 1) Existing home is to be lightly remodeled to function as the office with site improvements to provide office employee and visitor parking. a. We are proposing to remove the small homestead garage to create employee parking lot 2) Remaining accessory buildings are to remain and be utilized by the business for equipment and materials storage. 3) Temporary aggregate surface to accommodate business operations, equipment staging, materials staging, and employee parking. 4) Excavate on site to expand existing on-site depression to increase site drainage storage/volume capacity. Existing drainage patterns remain. BUILDING USE As stated above the homestead will be transitioned to an office for 2-3 office staff. Restroom will remain and be accessible to field and office staff. Bedrooms will be transitioned to offices. None of the buildings will be open to the general public. Shed 1 as noted on the site plan will be for pick-up trucks and standard garage supplies as well as project supplies. Shed 2 will be used for equipment and truck storage as well as general maintenance. Proper fire / safety plans will be posted in all buildings. Appropriate Exit signs and extinguishers will be installed. OUTSIDE STORAGE & SCREENING We have proposed an outdoor storage area behind Building 1 & 2. The outdoor storage will consist of several pieces of equipment and job materials standard to a contractor's yard. The pad will initially consist of washed rock (no fines) to minimize debris on County Road 30. Outside storage will be fully screened with vegetation along the west and east side similar to Doboszenski & Sons (Picture Below). This is a continuation of an existing treeline which we feel will be visually appealing. Please refer to C5 for a detailed landscaping plan. Additionally, a screening fence made of solid metal corrugated sheathing and 2x6 treated wood. The fence is 6ft high 48ft wide fence will be installed on the east side of building 2 to the setback to create additional screening to county road 30. Fence is shown on C1 & C5. Please see the following picture from Randahl Construction for visual on style. We understand that curb appeal affects our reputation that is why all exterior storage will be behind Building 1 & 2 and properly screened similar to other contracting businesses in the neighborhood. We will maintain a clean and respectable view from the street. We are not proposing additional lighting at this time and feel the current exterior building lighting is sufficient for proposed use. IMPACT ON TRAFFIC & ADJOINING PROPERTIES Our impact on the traffic will be similar to the previous owners and renters (kothrade excavating). The property previously had 2-3 family members in and out of the house and 6 Quad trucks in and out of Building 2. The adjoining properties to the north, east, and west, are currently farmlands or pasture. The property to the south is fully screened with trees. Farmlands are currently guided for commercial use. IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL, SEPTIC SYSTEM, WELL Wetland Delineation was completed and it was confirmed that there is not wetland on the property. C2 shows the approximate location of existing drain tile to handle runoff. We will be expanding the low area and adding capacity for potential excessive water. There will not be any environmental impact to the existing septic system and well which is updated. FUTURE EXPANSION PLANS We have grown steadily as a business over the last several years adding 1 piece of equipment and 1 staff member each year. We do anticipate to continue that steady growth over the next few years and have been thoughtful in this plan to accommodate doing so in a visually appealing manner. Long term we could see this corner being developed into an industrial park depending on what the surrounding properties do. We feel that is too far ahead to plan for at this time and would like to focus on how we intend to use the property now and in the near future. If we develop we plan on full transparency for any future stages or developments. We sincerely appreciate your consideration to consolidate and grow our business in your community! :) Project Narrative - Additional Information T Scherber Demolition and Excavating File 21-007 / 23240 County Road 30 April 27, 2021 We want to mention that we are presenting an interim plan for review. We will be transitioning the homestead into a small office (for employees only; no public) and adding a small-contractor yard behind the existing large exterior accessory building. The vehicle traffic is expected to be the same as the current CUP for Kothrade. After reading Kendra’s report and seeing all of the requirements / changes that were called out we requested a meeting with City Staff and Engineers. On Tuesday, April 13 we had a meeting with Kevin Mattson with the City of Corcoran and Kenton Torve with Wenck to come up with a more cost effective interim stormwater plan. It was suggested that the condition of the current drain tile be televised. If the drain tile is in good condition and if an agreement was made with the neighbor that Scherber’s would accept responsibility should repairs be needed in this interim phase. It was agreed that no immediate or extensive stormwater / sewer update would be necessary. Later that same day we met with Kendra Lindahl & Brad Martens to communicate the storm sewer recommendations and to further communicate the financial hardship additional screening and an asphalt pour would be. We were assured these were recommendations and would be at the discretion of the City Council. We are again asking for minimal financial impact until we present a final plan. Our plan is to move into and use our new headquarters / facility for a few years before proposing a final plan to develop this site. This is when we feel big updates to storm sewer, asphalt, heavy screening will be appropropriate. Because we are presenting an interim plan and due to Covid-19, we need to keep entry costs to this property low. We have had productive meetings with City Staff, City consultants and the Mayor this month. In speaking with the Mayor we learned the City of Corcoran is working to build better partnerships with small businesses. We hope the City Council can support our interim proposed plan and allow a phased approach for anything discretionary (screening, paved entry, etc.) considering we have spent over $25,000 just to get in front of the Council. Respectfully, Trevor & Missy Scherber ABOUT: T.SCHERBERA SPECIALTY CONTRACTOR YOU CAN COUNT ON — ALWAYS. T.Scherber is a full-service, diversified contractor providing an array of earthmoving services and waste management solutions to builders, developers, and general contractors in the Twin Cities. Established in 2009 as a roll-off and hauling company with one dumpster and one truck. We expanded into the demolition and excavating sector in 2013, adding one excavator and skid steer to the fleet. Since then, we’ve expanded our fleet and equipment to five excavators, five skid steers, three compactors, a dozer, and four quad axle dump trucks run by an extremely talented team of union operators and drivers. Over the last five years, T.Scherber has become a trusted excavation contractor in the high-end custom residential and over the last year in the light commercial sector. A few commercial projects we’ve recently supported with excavation, utilities, and sewer & water are the “51st & France” Building, Sheldon Place Town home Villas, Medina MotorAutoPlex, and the Rogers Tennis Court Facility for Rogers Public Schools. We also provided Demolition & Site Work at the BP Gas Station for the City of Long Lake and for two historic sites, including the Pillsbury Mansion. We’re extremely proud that the footprint of our work is at the foundation of over 30 homes on the shores of Lake Minnetonka. Demolition of a 21,000 ft2 Mansion Site work, soil correction, foundation, sewer and water for a new 13,000 ft2 home. WOODLAND, MN | JOHN KRAEMER & SONS Wetland Restoration Site work, soil correction, foundation, sewer and water, along with restoration of natural wetland. MEDINA, MN | NORSON Trevor Scherber (952) 292-9633 trevor@tscherber.com HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATOR | 15 years Excels in array of equipment including excavator, dozer, skid steer. Read grade, surveys, laser set up. Trains all of employed operators. FOREMAN | 6 years Skilled on-site management, leading operating crews, and quality control for the customers. Currently runs three full-time crews and coordinates all site materials. ESTIMATING | 6 years Proficient in cost analysis, takeoffs, and assessing T&M for jobs up to $250K. Bidding was awarded $1.9 million dollars of work in 2020. FLEET MANAGEMENT | 10 years Knowledgeable in equipment purchasing and maintenance. Expanded the fleet to include five excavators, five skid steers, etc. Oversees a team of mechanics and welders. FINANCE | 10 years Majored in Accounting at University of Minnesota Missy Scherber (952) 300-5876 missy@tscherber.com www.linkedin.com/in/missy-scherber-41224a7a PRESIDENT | 6 years Provides strategic planning and vision for the business. Oversees business operations and upholds company core values and mission. Provides professional public presence on behalf of the company to customers, associations, and the union. Implements up-to-date knowledge of the industry and leads the business through necessary changes and adaptations. Overseeing accounting and purchasing department BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT | 6 years Developed, represented, and expanded the T.Scherber brand to the current status. Responsible for an average 45% growth rate. Manages all proposal coordination and delivery PERMITTING | 6 years Manages all permits and certifications for individual jobs and overall business operations “Model of Compliance” approach to permitting HR / DIVERSITY | 4 Years Development of employee handbook and online onboarding portal. Developing an “Inclusive & Diverse” recruitment and retention strategy. SAFETY DIRECTOR | 4 years Works with OSHA consultant to ensure jobs are performed safely PHILANTHROPY | 15 years Eight year career as a Major Donor Officer for non-profit organizations before leading a construction company. Attended the United Nations Summit on “Innovative Philanthropy and Social Entrepreneurship.” CAPABILITIES: CORE VALUESA FULL SERVICE APPROACH FROM START TO FINISH. Our projects are handled with our core values of safety, service, and support in mind during every phase of the project. We strive to maintain the following commitments in everything we do: DEMOLITION • LEED CERTIFIED • Sustainability Consulting • Utility, Gas, Sewer and Water Disconnects • Asbestos Testing & Abatement • Complete Tear Down & Removal More Recycling, Less Landfill ENVIRONMENTAL • Drainage Ditches • Retention Ponds • Soil Stabilization • Land Reclamation • Storm Water Management EXCAVATION • Residential and Commercial Foundations • Piling and Shoring • Site Utilities • Sewer and Water • Test Pits and Trenching • Septic Systems INDUSTRIAL & HAZARDOUS HAULING With our HAZWOPER certification, we are able to contain, haul away, and dispose of industrial waste and chemically impacted soil―as well as debris from landfill clean-ups and roadside spills― to MPCA approved campuses. CAPABILITIES: DEMOLITION + EXCAVATINGA JOB WELL DONE FROM THE GROUND DOWN. STRICT SAFETY STANDARDS Site safety is the very essence of what we do. We conform closely to OSHA standards of safety with site checks and posted signage, and this year we’ve also implemented a rigid covid-19 protocol, taking temps and wiping down vehicles. EXPERIENCED FIELD TEAM We ensure that everyone in the team is experienced in their trade and offer further training to strengthen the skill sets and support the careers of our employees. SOLUTIONS ORIENTED We think “good enough” is never good enough. There’s always a better way to get something done, and we strive to implement modern solutions to solve our customer’s problems. EXCELLENT CUSTOMER SERVICE TECHNOLOGY FORWARD CLEAN SITE PRESENCE Union Contractor We’ve been a member of the Local 49 since 2016 and are building a strong partnership with their workforce development initiatives including “Women Who Operate”. DOING DIRTY JOBS DIFFERENTLY. “INTEGRITY IN CONSTRUCTION” IS A PERMANENT FIXTURE OF OUR LOGO FOR A REASON. We aim to reshape the waste and earthmoving industry and set the new standard. Over the years our passion has been “Doing Dirty Jobs Differently,” with integrity. To us, “Integrity in Construction” means holding the highest standards for the work we do on-site, while also maintaining strong principles in the way we manage business off-site. From our safety practices and the relationships we maintain with cities― right down to the foundational support we provide contractors and our local community―we strive to do a better job, in a more diverse way. Breaking Ground and Breaking the Mold through Innovation and Technology T.Scherber is a young forward thinking business that understands the value of using tech and cloud based collaboration to provide top notch service and management. In addition to updating our fleet to have GPS capabilities, we’ve integrated our processes with the cloud to streamline just about everything we do. We’ve found that field and customer communication has improved dramatically through innovative software being created and constantly updated for the earthmoving industry. “Medina Villas” Development Site work, soil corrections for development, foundation, drain tile, sewer and water for 19 homes. MEDINA, MN | CHARLES CUDD For more information on the tech we use, and how to download and use them: TSCHERBER.COM/TECH CAPABILITIES: ROLL-OFFS + HAULINGCOMPLETING THE (RE)CYCLE. Timely deliveries and on-site service, second to none. T. Scherber takes great pride in handling all of your disposal needs by providing simple, sustainable, up-to-date solutions for commercial contractors in the Twin Cities. We’re a competitive, reliable, dumpster rental company with a customer service advantage. We’re extremely proud that our drivers are lead and trained by a woman, Deb Cole. She’s an industry veteran who joined the team to help expand the female representation in the field. Deb is passionate about customer service and helping more women get into the industry. She was told “no, you can't” early on in her career, and hopes to one day tell a team of women and minority drivers, “yes, you can!" Project Highlight: Demolition Dumpsters A core part of the dumpster business since the very beginning has been hauling demolition debris. We started as “Scherber Roll-Offs” and focused on supporting excavation contractors with this service. We’re developing a specific “Demolition Site” training for our drivers and hope to support our CPP Excavation Contractor exclusively with our hauling services. Deb Cole LEAD DRIVER HOUSING FIRST “RISING STAR” NOMINATION Missy Scherber was nominated for the “Rising Star,” an award that honors emerging leaders. Rising Stars exemplify leadership qualities, represent excellence and show a dedication to activities which build industry relationships and promote professional development. T.S. SUPPORTS MUCA’S “DAY OF THE DOZER” We have donated our time and services to this community event that raises money for Children’s Hospital MN. USA TODAY BUSINESS & TECH FEATURE “WOMEN IN THE TRADES” Missy Scherber was featured for the community she has built online to support women in the construction industry, and discusses how critical diversity is as a vital part of daily hiring and business practices. HOUSING INDUSTRY NEWS “HOUSING FIRST MEMBER HELPS WITH CLEAN-UP” Article featured T.Scherber’s support for Minneapolis in their efforts to clean up after 2020 BLM-related riots in the third precinct by donating dumpster service to a Lake Street non-profit Urban Ventures. GRADING & EXCAVATING MAGAZINE PROFILE: TREVOR SCHERBER This article highlights why Trevor started the business, his partnership with Missy, and how he combined an “old school” work ethic inherited from his father with new approaches in technology and innovation to experience growth. CATERPILLAR™ “CUSTOMER STORY” FEATURE Caterpillar’s Global Marketing team dedicates a month long feature of T.Scherber with a series of blog boats on their official site and a 4 part video series on their YouTube Channel. “TOP 100 WOMEN” AWARDS MISSY SCHERBER Global Award for industry leaders who make a strong contribution towards the construction industry becoming a better place for women to work. EARTHMOVERS MAGAZINE UK “HUSBAND AND WIFE CAT FANS ARE THE DREAM TEAM” Article highlighting recent Caterpillar “Customer Story” feature, Missy and Trevor’s work ethic, and commitment to building a better, more diverse industry. ABOUT: WOMEN OWNED WE CAN DO IT WITH DIVERSITY. 2020 proved to be a milestone year for us: we were awarded our WBE, MBE, and SBE status. Our hope with these certifications is to transition T.Scherber’s services into the public, federal, and larger commercial work spheres. We want our work to be at the foundation of the buildings the community counts on every day. It’s been rewarding to see both private and public workplaces begin to put a higher priority on inclusion and diversity—and we hope with these certifications to be a part of that. We have always had a deep sense of community service, sustainability, and inclusivity. Our goal is to have integrity towards the status we’ve been given by committing to diversity in everything we do. While this mission isn’t the road of least resistance, it’s part of our foundation; we embody these goals to make sure our business and hiring practices are diverse—and hold the same standards to the supply chains we work with. The changing face of a traditional industry. T. Scherber is woman-and-minority owned and operated. It’s another reason we’re different. By taking steps to defy the stereotypes, we’re forging new pathways for future generations of earth-movers and providing diverse role models and fresh points of view in an established and time-worn industry. COMMUNITYA SOLID FOUNDATION OFGIVING BACK. T. Scherber is committed to taking our standard of support beyond the construction site and into the community. We partner with several with our contractors and local and national non-profit organizations to support the individuals and families that need it most. Visit tscherber.com/charities for more information. Bring the whole family! We invite the community onto the worksite with family-friendly events that bring the neighborhood together to watch the transformation and to open up the world of construction to the next generation of earthmovers and shakers. Contact our office staff for information about the next family event (952) 452-2760 | office@tscherber.com 11415 Valley Drive Rogers, MN 55374 (952) 452-2760 TSCHERBER.COM HENNEPIN COUNTY SITE PROJECT LOCATION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN SITE MINNESOTA T. SCHERBER DEMOLITION & EXCAVATION CORCORAN, MN S I T E County Road No. 19County Road No. 30 C0 S I T E T. Scherber Demolition & Excavating CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN11415 Vally Drive Rogers, MN 55374 Trevor Scherber trevor@tscherber.com 952-292-9633 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PLANS CORCORAN, MN COUNTY ROAD NO. 19COUNTY ROAD NO. 30 C1 EXISTING ZONING PROJECT LOCATION T. Scherber Demolition & Excavating CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN11415 Vally Drive Rogers, MN 55374 Trevor Scherber trevor@tscherber.com 952-292-9633 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: SURVEY DATA SITE PLAN NOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND: SITE DATA: EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION KEY NOTES: COUNTY ROAD NO. 19COUNTY ROAD NO. 30 C2 T. Scherber Demolition & Excavating CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN11415 Vally Drive Rogers, MN 55374 Trevor Scherber trevor@tscherber.com 952-292-9633 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: LEGEND: SURVEY DATA NOTE: COUNTY ROAD NO. 19COUNTY ROAD NO. 30 C3 T. Scherber Demolition & Excavating CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN11415 Vally Drive Rogers, MN 55374 Trevor Scherber trevor@tscherber.com 952-292-9633 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULE EROSION CONTROL NOTES EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE VEGETATION GROUND COVER SCHEDULE SWPP NARRATIVE POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES DESIGN CALCULATIONS SWPPP Designer: RESPONSIBLE PARTY Owner: T.SCHERBER DEMOLISHING & EXCAVATION Contractor: Manager: Trevor Scherber EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES: TOTAL SITE DATA: PROJECT LOCATION EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LEGEND: SURVEY DATA COUNTY ROAD NO. 19COUNTY ROAD NO. 30 C4 T. Scherber Demolition & Excavating CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN11415 Vally Drive Rogers, MN 55374 Trevor Scherber trevor@tscherber.com 952-292-9633 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: LEGEND: DEMOLITION NOTES SURVEY DATA COUNTY ROAD NO. 19COUNTY ROAD NO. 30 C5 T. Scherber Demolition & Excavating CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN11415 Vally Drive Rogers, MN 55374 Trevor Scherber trevor@tscherber.com 952-292-9633 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: C6 T. Scherber Demolition & Excavating CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN11415 Vally Drive Rogers, MN 55374 Trevor Scherber trevor@tscherber.com 952-292-9633 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: AGGREGATE SURFACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7k. Council Meeting: May 27th, 2021 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Liquor License Approvals Action Required: Approval Summary: The City licenses establishments annually for the sale of liquor. Staff has received renewal information from three of the four licensed establishments. Staff will be contacting establishments to finalize the outstanding license renewal paperwork. For license approval, applicants must submit the required application materials and insurance documentation for license renewal. The Fire Marshal will complete an inspection of the establishment to ensure there are no safety hazards and staff will complete an annual background check. Financial/Budget: License fees are estimated annually and are a budgeted revenue source. Council Action: Approve Resolution 2021-51 Resolution Approving Beer and Liquor Licenses in the City of Corcoran, Minnesota. Attachments: 1. To be Provided Separately - Resolution 2021-51 Resolution Approving Beer and Liquor Licenses in the City of Corcoran, Minnesota City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-51 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING BEER AND LIQUOR LICENSES IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Corcoran that the following Liquor and 3.2 Malt Liquor Licenses are granted a conditional license effective July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022, to the following establishments and licensees provided the appropriate application and insurance documents are submitted and payment for the license is made, and background investigation and Fire Marshal inspection of liquor license establishments are completed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, if a licensee has provided payment for the license, appropriate paperwork, background investigation, and the Fire Marshal inspection is completed, the licensee application will be considered complete and granted fully with no conditional status required. ESTABLISHMENT LICENSEE LICENSES Stanchion Bar Stanchion Bar, Inc. On-Sale Liquor Off-Sale Liquor Special "On-Sale Sunday" Mama G’s Mama G’s Operations LLC On-Sale Liquor Off-Sale Liquor Special "On-Sale Sunday" Golden Acres Golf Course Pheasant Acres Golf Club On-Sale Liquor Special “On-Sale Sunday” Shamrock Golf Course Shamrock Golf Operations LLC On-Sale 3.2 Liquor On-Sale Wine City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-51 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of May 2021. ___________________________ Ron Thomas - Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7l. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Easement Agreement Action Required: Approval Summary: Staff is finalizing plans for the 66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements project. As part of that work, easement acquisition is required. Attached to this agreement is a recommended easement agreement to purchase easements for a portion of the project. The property owners hav e agreed to the e asement agreement. Financial/Budget: The easement agreement purchases required e asements in the amount of $42,400. This amount reflects a purchase pr ice obtained through an appraisal of the land value. Costs will be paid out of the project fund which included costs for easement acquisition . Council Action: Approve the easement agreement as presented. Attachments: 1.Easement Agreement EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ______ day of _______________2021, by and between the City of Corcoran, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City/Grantee”) and Craig S. Theis and Rita Mae Theis, (“Grantors”), the City and Grantors are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “parties”, and the effective date of this Agreement shall be when all parties have executed the Agreement. RECITALS 1. Grantors are fee owners of real property located in the City of Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota described in Exhibit A, attached hereto (the “Grantor Parcels”). The Grantor Parcels consist of two parcels (“Grantor Parcel 1” and “Grantor Parcel 2”) also individually described in the attached Exhibit A 2. Grantee seeks to purchase exclusive permanent easement for roadway, drainage, and utility purposes over, under, and across certain portions of the Grantor Parcels along with temporary easement for construction purposes over the same, as well as permanent drainage and utility easement over, under, and across certain portions of Grantor Parcel 1, all in order to implement the 66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements Project (the “Project”). The real property interests to be acquired are described in the attached Exhibit B (“the Subject Easements”). 3. Grantee agrees to purchase and Grantors agree to sell the Subject Easements, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4. Grantee is purchasing the Subject Easements for a public purpose, to-wit: The 66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements Project 2. 5. Grantors acknowledge that the consideration contemplated in this Agreement is fair compensation for the Subject Easements. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Grantors, for and in consideration of forty-two thousand four hundred dollars ($42,400.00), along with the covenants set forth herein, hereby grants and conveys unto the Grantee, its contractors, agents, and employees, the right, privilege, authority and, unless designated otherwise herein, an exclusive permanent easement to freely use the premises herein described as the Subject Easements for the purposes of constructing, altering, repairing, maintaining, inspecting, putting into operation and thereafter operating public roadways, drainage infrastructure, and all necessary public utilities for water and sanitary sewer and stormwater infrastructure, including, but not limited to, pipes, lines and appurtenances thereof of said City, over, under, in, upon and across the following described real property, said Grantee agreeing to install the same in a commercially reasonable matter, to-wit: Permanent Easement for Roadway, Drainage and Utility Purposes 1. Grantors hereby grant and convey to the Grantee these permanent easements for roadway, drainage and utility purposes on, over, under, and across those portions of the Grantor Parcels legally described on the attached Exhibit B, and designated therein as “PERMANENT ROADWAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT” and depicted on Exhibit C (the “Roadway Easements”). These Roadway Easements shall be perpetual, shall run with the land, shall be binding upon Grantors and their successors and assigns and shall be for the benefit of Grantee and its successors and assigns. 2. The Roadway Easements shall be exclusive. Any future easement affecting the Roadway Easement area shall be subject to Grantee’s consent and, if such consent is given, in writing, any such subsequently granted easement shall be subordinate to, and shall not interfere with, the Roadway Easements contemplated herein. 3. The Roadway Easements are permanent easements for roadway, drainage, and utility purposes granted herein and include the right of the Grantee, its contractors, agents, employees, and assigns to locate, install, construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, inspect, alter and repair within the described Roadway Easement area any of the following facilities and amenities: public roadway, roadway infrastructure, roadway signage, public and/or private utilities, drainage infrastructure, snow storage infrastructure, and all necessary public utilities for water and sanitary sewer, including, but not limited to, pipes, lines and appurtenances thereof of Grantee, over, under, in, upon and across the Roadway Easement area. Grantors hereby convey all grasses, shrubs, trees and natural growth now existing in and on the Roadway Easement area. Grantee shall have the right to use and remove all earthen materials, structures, improvements and obstructions which lie within the boundaries of the Roadway Easement area, including the right of clearing the area to allow for the use of the land for roadway, drainage, or utility purposes or as otherwise stated 3. herein. Further, Grantee shall have the right of ingress and egress across the Roadway Easement area. Grantors shall not obstruct or otherwise frustrate Grantee’s use of the Roadway Easement area. Grantors agree not to do anything that will tend to interfere with the operation and maintenance of the Roadway Easement, without first securing the written approval of Grantee. 4. This permanent easement for roadway, drainage, and utility purposes is for public purposes. The public road to be constructed shall be open to the general public. 5. Grantee shall take all reasonable measures to ensure that the Roadway Easement area is properly designed and graded to address drainage from the public road within the Roadway Easement area. Permanent Easement for Drainage and Utility Purposes 1. Grantors hereby grant and convey to the Grantee this permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes on, over, under, and across those portions of Grantor Parcel 1 legally described on the attached Exhibit B, and designated therein as “PERMANENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT” and depicted on Exhibit C (the “Utility Easement”). This Utility Easement shall be perpetual, shall run with the land, shall be binding upon Grantors and their successors and assigns and shall be for the benefit of Grantee and its successors and assigns. 2. The Utility Easement shall be nonexclusive; provided, however, this Utility Easement shall be prior to and superior to any other easement hereinafter granted. Any future easement shall be subject to and subordinate to, and shall not interfere with the Utility Easement without the consent, in writing, of Grantee. 3. Grantee, its employees, agents, and contractors are hereby granted the right to access and use the Utility Easement area for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, utilizing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining the easement area and any now or later constructed utility and drainage facilities therein including, but not limited to, pipes, lines and appurtenances thereof of said City, over, under, in, upon and across the Utility Easement area. Grantors hereby convey all grasses, shrubs, trees and natural growth now existing on the easement hereby conveyed. Grantee shall have the right to use and remove all earthen materials, structures, improvements and obstructions which lie within the boundaries of the Utility Easement described herein, including the right of clearing the Utility Easement area to allow for the use of the land for drainage, utilities or as otherwise as stated herein. Further, Grantee shall have the right of ingress and egress across the Utility Easement area. Grantors shall not obstruct or otherwise frustrate Grantee’s use of the Utility Easement area. Grantors agree not to place any structure upon the Utility Easement area or do anything that will tend to interfere with the operation and maintenance of the Utility Easement, without first securing the written approval of Grantee. 4. 4. Grantors and Grantee agree to allow Grantors a limited encroachment right exclusively over a portion of the Utility Easement described on the attached Exhibit D (the “Future Driveway Encroachment Area”). This limited encroachment right shall permit Grantors, upon acquisition of all other necessary real property rights and government and/or watershed approvals, to construct a driveway over the Future Driveway Encroachment Area described on the attached Exhibit D. Grantee shall maintain all of its Utility Easement rights within the Future Driveway Encroachment Area which are not inconsistent with this limited encroachment right. Grantors’ construction, maintenance and use of the Future Driveway Encroachment Area shall not interfere with Grantee’s installed drainage and utility infrastructure within the same area. In the event that Grantee requires access to such infrastructure, Grantors shall be obligated to temporarily suspend use of the Future Driveway Encroachment Area as is necessary to permit Grantee to complete any required maintenance. Further, if such maintenance requires Grantee to disturb the surface of any established driveway within the Future Driveway Encroachment Area, upon completion of the work, Grantee shall make a reasonable functional restoration of the disturbed surface area. However, nothing in this provisions shall obligate Grantee to make major aesthetic restorations. For illustration, but not limitation, in the event Grantors construct a paved driveway within the Future Driveway Encroachment Area and that pavement is disturbed by Grantee’s maintenance activities, Grantee’s restoration obligations shall be to patch the disturbed portion of the pavement, but Grantee shall have no obligation to resurface undisturbed portions of pavement on the driveway. The provisions of this paragraph are intended to describe an encroachment right and are not intended to, and shall not waive any permitting requirements or necessary approvals for the construction of a driveway. Temporary Construction Easement 1. Grantors hereby grant and convey to Grantee, temporary construction easement on, over, under, and across those portions of the Grantor Parcels legally described on the attached Exhibit B, and designated therein as either “TEMPORARY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT” or “TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT” and depicted on Exhibit C. Such easements shall be collectively referred to herein as the “Temporary Construction Easements” and the labeling in Exhibit B shall not affect the rights herein granted related to those easement areas. 2. These Temporary Construction Easements include the right of Grantee, its employees, agents, contractors, and assigns to use the real property described for grading and related roadway, drainage, and utility infrastructure construction purposes. Grantee shall have the right to use and remove all earthen materials, structures, improvements and obstructions which lie within the boundaries of the Temporary Construction Easements, including the right of clearing the area within the Temporary Construction Easements to allow for the use of the land for construction and grading purposes or as otherwise stated herein. 3. Grantee shall take all reasonable precautions to prevent damage to the Grantor Parcels and Grantee will make reasonable efforts to restore the area within the Temporary Construction Easements, including restoration of the surface area, to like condition. 5. 4. The Temporary Construction Easements shall expire December 31, 2022. Additional Terms 1. As of the date of this Agreement, the Grantor Parcels are not currently connected into City of Corcoran sewer and water services and are serviced by well and private septic systems. As conditions of the grant of the Subject Easements, Grantee agrees: 1) that Grantee will not mandate that Grantors connect the Grantor Parcels to the City of Corcoran public water and sewer system as long as the Grantor Parcels are serviced by a functional and validly permitted septic system, as determined by Hennepin County or the appropriate regulatory agency; and 2) upon completion of the Project, the Grantor Parcels shall have access to connect to City of Corcoran sanitary sewer services, however, this agreement for access shall not waive connection fees/costs in effect at the time of connection. 2. Grantors warrant that: 1) They own good and marketable title to the Grantor Parcels described within this instrument and the exhibits hereto, 2) have the unencumbered right, title, and capacity to convey the Subject Easements to the Grantee, and 3) the undersigned are authorized to execute this Agreement. 3. Grantee agrees to perform all Project work on the Grantor Parcels in a commercially reasonable manner. 4. The parties agree that the terms and conditions of this instrument shall run with the land (Grantor Parcels) and be binding on the Grantors, Grantee, and their respective successors and assigns. The parties agree to cooperate with one another in recording this document, and agree to re-execute the same should it be necessary to facilitate such recording with Hennepin County. 5. To the extent any disagreement exists as to the descriptions of the Subject Easements contained in Exhibits B and C, those descriptions contained in Exhibit B shall control. [Signatures on pages to follow] 6 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said Subject Easements unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns, as described herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year indicated. GRANTORS: Dated: __________________ By: __________________________ Craig S. Theis Dated: __________________ By: __________________________ Rita Mae Theis STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ________________________, 2021, by Craig S. Theis and Rita Mae Theis, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described herein and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Notary Public 7 GRANTEE: CITY OF CORCORAN Dated: __________________ By: __________________________ Its Mayor Dated: __________________ By: __________________________ Its Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2021, by Tom McKee, the Mayor and by Brad Martens, the City Administrator of the City of Corcoran on behalf of said municipal corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: John J. Thames, Esq. CARSON, CLELLAND & SCHREDER 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway, Suite 305 Minneapolis, MN 55430 763-561-2800 8 EXHIBIT A “Grantor Parcels” Description PID NO. 36-119-23-230001 That part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence South along the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 853.0 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 1011.0 feet; thence North parallel with said West line 395.0 feet; thence East parallel with said North line 332.39 feet to the East line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence North along said east line 458.0 feet to the Northeast corner of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence West along the north line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to the point of beginning, except the West 40 feet thereof taken for County Road No. 116, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and except the South 132 feet of the North 853 feet of the West 701 feet of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4. (Individually “Grantor Parcel 1”) AND PID NO. 36-119-23-230002 The South 132 feet of the North 853 feet of the West 701 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, of Section 36, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except road. (Individually “Grantor Parcel 2”) Grantor Parcel 1 and Grantor Parcel 2 are collectively described as the “Grantor Parcels” 9 EXHIBIT B “Subject Easements” Description Those parts of Grantor Parcel 1, described as follows: PERMANENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT: That part of the hereinbefore described parcel which lies 60.00 feet to the right of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of said OUTLOT A, COUNTRY SEASONS ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 07 seconds East, on an assumed bearing along the north line of said OUTLOT A, 816.82 feet to the point of beginning of said line; thence North 34 degrees 22 minutes 02 seconds East 43.77 feet; thence North 08 degrees 31 minutes 08 seconds East 443.12 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as “Point A”; thence continuing North 08 degrees 31 minutes 08 seconds East 382.30 feet to the north line of the hereinbefore described parcel and there said line terminating. Together, and contiguous with, that part of the north 66.00 feet of said parcel which lies easterly of the previously described 60 - foot wide permanent drainage and utility easement. The sidelines of said easement are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on the perimeter of said parcel. TEMPORARY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT: That part of the hereinbefore described parcel which lies 50.00 feet to the left of the following described line: Beginning at the point of beginning of the previously described line; thence northerly along said line to the hereinbefore described “Point A” and there said line terminating. And, all that part of said OUTLOT A lying easterly and southerly of the previously described 60.00-foot-wide permanent drainage and utility easement, Except for the most easterly 194.00 feet lying south of the north 166.00 feet the hereinbefore described parcel. The sideline of said easement is to be prolonged to terminate on the south line of said parcel. 10 PERMANENT ROADWAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT: The east 22.00 feet of the south 470.00 feet of the hereinbefore described parcel. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT: The east 10.00 feet of the west 32.00 feet of the south 470.00 feet and the north 10.00 feet of the south 480.00 feet of the east 32.00 feet of the hereinbefore described parcel. And Those parts of Grantor Parcel 2, described as follows: PERMANENT ROADWAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT: The west 25.00 feet of the hereinbefore described parcel. Being a 25.00-foot-wide strip parallel with and adjoining County Road No.116. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT: The east 10.00 feet of the west 35.00 feet of the hereinbefore described parcel. 11 EXHIBIT C “Subject Easements” Depiction COUNTY ROAD NO. 116PARK TRAIL NORTHWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W WWWWWW W W WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET W E T WET WET W E T WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETW ET W E T WE T W E T WE T WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WETWETWETWETWETW ETWETWET WET22'22'470.010'10'10'60.4'72.5'382.3'328.9'194.0'278.9'292'40'60'431.6'66.2'781'16.8'100'66'WETLAND DELINEATION COMPLETED 3/31/2020EASEMENT EXHIBIT PID NO. 36-119-23-230001PERMANENT ROADWAY, DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTTOTAL AREA = 10,407 SQ. FT. (0.24 AC)LOWLAND AREA = 10,407 SQ. FT. (0.24 AC)TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTTOTAL AREA = 5,021 SQ. FT. (0.12 AC)LOWLAND AREA = 5,021 SQ. FT. (0.12 AC)PERMANENT DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTTOTAL AREA = 79,544 SQ. FT. (1.83 AC)UPLAND AREA = 26,635 SQ. FT. (0.62 AC)LOWLAND AREA = 52,909 SQ. FT. (1.21 AC)EXISTING 10' (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PERTHE PLAT OF COUNTRY SEASONS ESTATESTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTTOTAL AREA = 105,570 SQ. FT. (2.42 AC)UPLAND AREA = 56,647 SQ. FT. (1.30 AC)LOWLAND AREA = 48,923 SQ. FT. (1.12 AC)ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTSUTILITY IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY ROAD NO. 11625'10'131.9' WET WET WET W E TWET WET WET WET WET WE T WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETW ET W ET WE T WE T WE T W ET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WETWETLAND DELINEATION COMPLETED 3/31/2020EASEMENT EXHIBIT PID NO. 36-119-23-230002PERMANENT ROADWAY, DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTTOTAL AREA = 3,298 SQ. FT. (0.076 AC)UPLAND AREA = 1,593 SQ. FT. (0.036 AC)LOWLAND AREA = 1,705 SQ. FT. (0.04 AC)TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTTOTAL AREA = 1,319 SQ. FT. (0.03 AC)UPLAND AREA = 540 SQ. FT. (0.01 AC)LOWLAND AREA = 779 SQ. FT. (0.02 AC)ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 12 EXHIBIT D “Future Driveway Encroachment Area” Description and Depiction 1 FUTURE DRIVEWAY ENCROACHMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PID NO. 36-119-23-230001 6640 CO. RD. NO. 116 CS & RM THEIS EXISTING PARCEL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence South along the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 853.0 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 1011.0 feet; thence North parallel with said West line 395.0 feet; thence East parallel with said North line 332.39 feet to the East line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence North along said east line 458.0 feet to the Northeast corner of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence West along the north line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to the point of beginning, except the West 40 feet thereof taken for County Road No. 116, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and except the South 132 feet of the North 853 feet of the West 701 feet of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA TO BE ENCROACHED: That part of the hereinbefore described parcel which lies 60.00 feet to the right of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of said OUTLOT A, COUNTRY SEASONS ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 07 seconds East, on an assumed bearing along the north line of said OUTLOT A, 816.82 feet to the point of beginning of said line; thence North 34 degrees 22 minutes 02 seconds East 43.77 feet; thence North 08 degrees 31 minutes 08 seconds East 443.12 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as “Point A”; thence continuing North 08 degrees 31 minutes 08 seconds East 382.30 feet to the north line of the hereinbefore described parcel and there said line terminating. Together, and contiguous with, that part of the north 66.00 feet of said parcel which lies easterly of the previously described 60 - foot wide permanent drainage and utility easement. The sidelines of said easement are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on the perimeter of said parcel. (Continued on Page 2) 2 FUTURE DRIVEWAY ENCROACHMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: FUTURE DRIVEWAY ENCROACHMENT AREA: That part of the hereinbefore described drainage and utility easement lying east of a line parallel with and 985.72 feet east of the west line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36 and south of a line parallel with and 432.92 feet south of the north line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; And, that part of the hereinbefore described drainage and utility easement lying 30.00 feet either side of the following described center line: Commencing at northeast corner of said parcel; thence west 348.38 feet along the north line of said parcel to the point of beginning of said centerline; thence deflecting left and southeasterly, 135 degrees 12 minutes 34 seconds for a distance of 130.00 feet and said centerline there terminating. COUNTY ROAD NO. 116 P A R K T R A I L N O R T H W W W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WET WET WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET22'22'470.010'10'10'60.4'72.5'382.3'328.9'194.0'278.9'292'40'60'431.6' 66 . 2 ' 781' 16 . 8 '100'66'WETLAND DELINEATION COMPLETED 3/31/2020ACCESS ENCROACHMENT1110 SQ. FT.ACCESS ENCROACHMENT4881 SQ. FT.25'25'60'6 0 'ENCROACHMENT EXHIBIT PID NO. 36-119-23-230001“”PERMANENT ROADWAY, DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTTOTAL AREA = 10,407 SQ. FT. (0.24 AC)LOWLAND AREA = 10,407 SQ. FT. (0.24 AC)TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTTOTAL AREA = 5,021 SQ. FT. (0.12 AC)LOWLAND AREA = 5,021 SQ. FT. (0.12 AC)PERMANENT DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTTOTAL AREA = 79,544 SQ. FT. (1.83 AC)UPLAND AREA = 26,635 SQ. FT. (0.62 AC)LOWLAND AREA = 52,909 SQ. FT. (1.21 AC)EXISTING 10' (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PERTHE PLAT OF COUNTRY SEASONS ESTATESTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTTOTAL AREA = 105,570 SQ. FT. (2.42 AC)UPLAND AREA = 56,647 SQ. FT. (1.30 AC)LOWLAND AREA = 48,923 SQ. FT. (1.12 AC)ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTSUTILITY IMPROVEMENTSFUTURE DRIVEWAY ENCROACHMENT ON PERMANENTEASEMENTFUTURE DRIVEWAY ENCROACHMENT AREA STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7m. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Employee Resignation; Recruitment Process Action Required: Accept and Approve Summary: Staff has received a resignation notice fro m Joe Rotz, accountant. Staff requests the Council accept the resignation and auth orize an open recruitment process to fill the vacant position. Additionally, due to the nature of the position, staff is requesting aut horization to enter into an agreement with BerganKDV to assist with finance duties while the pos ition remains vacant. BerganKDV assists the City in various finance items as needed throughout the year including audit pr eparation. This timeline is assumed to be through mid to late July. Financial/Budget: Costs associated for the finance assistance contract with Berg anKDV will be offset by cost savings while the position remains vacant. Council Action: Accept the resignation of Joe Rotz, accountant and authorize staff to begin a recruitment process for the vacant position; authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Bergan KDV to assist with finance duties while the position is vacant. Attachments: 1. Resignation Letter To: The honorable City Council and Mayor of the City of Corcoran Please accept my resignation from the position of Accountant with the City of Corcoran. I am making my resignation irrevocable. First, I want to give thanks to all the city staff that helped me during the last four years. There are many good people that work for the city. I would especially like to thank my coworkers for being patient. Second, I would like to thank the fine residents of Corcoran for allowing me to serve their community, and I want them to know that I respected their tax dollars. Third, I want to thank the other members of the community that were not residents but provided much needed services like those at Farmers State Bank of Hamel. Lastly, I would like to thank the consultants that provided me with help. Please know that I am truly thankful for all the help I have received. Sincerely, Joe Rotz, CPA, CGMA, MPA 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: May 20, 2021 for the May 27, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: NAPA Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance for the Property located at 19905 75th Avenue North (PID 26-119-23-11-0040) (city file no. 21-004) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:July 6, 2021 1.Application Request The applicant has requested approval of a site plan, a conditional use permit and variance to allow redevelopment of former Corcoran Liquor site to allow a new retail building. The building would allow the construction of a new NAPA Auto Parts and two future retail tenant spaces. A conditional use permit is required as the proposed use, Automobile Retail (tires, batteries, etc. No body work or repair work), is a conditional use in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial). Other retail uses are allowed as a permitted use. However, staff notes that if a tenant with drive-through is proposed a conditional use permit will be required. The applicant has also requested a variance for the project. The variance is for a 16-foot parking setback where the Zoning Ordinance requires a 100-foot setback from County Road 116. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this item at a public hearing on April 1, 2021. Other than the applicant, there was no one present to speak on this item. The Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the site plan and conditional use permit, but denial of the variance. Denial of the variance would require the applicant to modify the site plan to provide a 25-foot parking setback from County Road 116. Following the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant revised the plans to: •Eliminate the loading dock on the west side of the building •Increase the building depth from 65 feet to 80 feet •Increased to building size from 15,200 sq. ft. to 16,000 sq. ft. (at total build out) •Eliminated the future drive-through on the north •Changed the parking on the west from 90-degree to parallel stalls •Created a two-phase plan with a 12,800 sq. ft. NAPA space to built now and plans for a future addition of 3,200 sq. ft. for other tenants •Construct all parking now to serve current and future needs. Agenda Item: 8a. NAPA CUP, SP and Variance (21-004) 2 May 27, 2021 3. Context Zoning and Land Use The site is guided Commercial and zoned C-1 (neighborhood commercial). The site has an existing building and parking lot, which would be removed as part of the development. Surrounding Properties The property to the north and west are guided Commercial in Comprehensive Plan and zoned C-1. The property to the south is guided Industrial and is zoned I-1 (Light Industrial). The properties to the east, across County Road 116, are guided Mixed Use and Mixed Residential and zoned Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) and RMF-2 (Mixed Residential). Natural Characteristics of the Site This is a developed parcel and there are no natural resources identified in the Comprehensive Plan. There is a row of existing trees on the north lot line. The applicant is proposing to remove all existing trees on site. 4. Analysis of Request A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a site plan is limited to whether or not the plan meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the site plan amendment. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed request meets the standards outlined in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. Site Plan The request for the new building would provide space for the NAPA with two potential tenant spaces. The building would be an attractive addition to downtown, but the site is challenged to meet the required setbacks with a building of this size. The current plan shows construction of the 12,800 sq, ft. NAPA space only in phase 1 and a future phase 2 to be completed at a later date. Design Guidelines/Architecture The property is located in the Southeast District of the City, but is outside of the Town Center and does not have any specific architectural standards for the district. However, the building is subject to the standards in Section 1060.050 of the Zoning Ordinance. NAPA CUP, SP and Variance (21-004) 3 May 27, 2021 The plans show a 27-foot tall building with smooth finish precast panels as the primary building finish. The materials show three precast colors on the building. The plans do not detail the band color approximately 2/3 of the way up the wall. This appears to be an accent color, but details must be provided. The building materials comply with ordinance standards. Mechanical equipment locations are not shown on the plans, but must comply with Section 1060.030 of the Zoning Ordinance standards and the Southeast District standards. Equipment must be screened from view in a way that is integral to the architecture of the building. This equipment may not be located in the front yard. A trash enclosure is proposed in the northwest portion of the site. The trash enclosure would be constructed with precast panels to match the building and steel door with composite wood siding. This complies with ordinance standards. Details about the material colors should be provided. Lot Analysis Lot standards for the C-1 district are as follows: C-1 Standards NAPA Site Minimum lot area: Single-tenant building 25,000 square feet N/A Multi-tenant building 1 acre 1.51 acres Minimum lot width 100 feet 210 feet Minimum lot depth 200 feet 312 feet Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front, From County Road 116* 100 feet 86+/- feet Front, From all other streets 25 feet 25 feet Side 20 feet 30 feet Rear 20 feet 80 +/- feet Adjacent to Residential 50 feet N/A Minimum Parking/Drive Aisle Setbacks: Front, From County Road 116* 100 feet 16 feet Front, From all other streets 25 feet 25 feet Side and Rear 10 feet 10 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 27 feet Maximum Building Size 50,000 square feet 16,000 sq. ft. Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage 80% 67% *The 100-foot building and parking setback from CR 116 may be reduced to 60 feet and 25 feet respectively as allowed by Section 1060.080, Subd. K and L. The plans must be revised to dimension the exact parking, building and retaining wall setbacks. The applicant is reducing the building setback via the flexibility allowed by Section 1060.070 Subd. 2(K) of the Zoning Ordinance. This requires the applicant to provide landscaping beyond the minimum requirements or preserve significant landscaping in the area. The required setback may be reduced NAPA CUP, SP and Variance (21-004) 4 May 27, 2021 to the required front setback from other streets in that district if the applicant provides a minimum of one overstory deciduous tree, one overstory coniferous tree, two ornamental trees and 10 understory shrubs per 100 feet of the length of the property line where the flexibility is requested or preserves the equivalent number of existing trees and shrubs. These materials must be provided in addition to the minimum landscape requirements. Parking All parking areas are required to have a perimeter of poured, cast in place concrete curb. The plans show this around the parking area, but must be revised to show curb and gutter around the entire site including the access drives. The plan shows a total of 41 parking stalls where 40 parking stalls are required for a 16,000 sq. ft. building with the uses shown. This complies with the parking requirements. Additionally, the plans show loading areas on the west side of the building. This area is screened from County Road 116 by the building. Landscaping is provided on the west, north and south to try to screen this area from adjacent properties. Snow storage areas must be shown on the plans in an area that does not reduce the required number of parking stalls. Signage The ordinance limits signage to one 64-sq. ft. freestanding sign per property and wall signage up to 10% of the wall area of the elevation with the primary building entrance. On this building that would allow up to 540 sq. ft. of signage on the east elevation. The plans show a 118.5 sq. ft. NAPA sign plus two signs of undermined signs for future tenants. This would comply with ordinance requirements. Wall signs are limited to one sign at the primary entrance of each tenant space; therefore, the wall signage shown on the north and south elevation would not be allowed. The 64 sq. ft., 16 foot tall freestanding sign on the corner complies with the size requirements of the ordinance but must either be redesigned as a monument sign or the base must be revised to make the base at least 60% of the width of the sign (4.8 feet). All exposed pole or post structures must be wrapped or faced with stucco, architectural metal, brick or stone consistent with the building architecture. While this is not part of the current proposal, if a drive-through restaurant is ultimately permitted for the northern tenant space, it would also be allowed 2 menu boards, not to exceed 36-square feet per board. No more than 20% of the total area of the sign may be utilized for business identification. Menu boards may be internally illuminated. Menu boards must not conflict with pedestrian or parking areas. The area around freestanding signs shall be landscaped with plantings and maintained in such a manner to accent and enhance the sign. Figure 1 - Pylon sign base requirements NAPA CUP, SP and Variance (21-004) 5 May 27, 2021 Signs may be illuminated according to the standards of Section 84.04, Subd. 8 of the Sign Ordinance. The applicant must provide information showing compliance with these standards as part of the sign permit application. Staff has a condition stating that all signage must comply with ordinance standards. All signs require a permit to be constructed and will be reviewed at the time of permit submittal. Landscaping The applicant’s landscape plan is generally consistent with ordinance requirements by providing landscaping around the buildings and parking lots. The applicant would be required to provide 21 overstory trees and 55 understory shrubs or the equivalent to meet basic requirements PLUS 4 deciduous trees, 4 conifer trees, 7 ornamental trees and 32 shrubs to allow the building setback to be reduced from 100 feet to approximately 86 feet. The plans must be revised to add this additional landscaping. Furthermore, as noted in the parking section, additional landscaping is required between the parking and County Road 116 to screen the vehicle headlights to a height of three feet. The 32 additional shrubs will help to meet this requirement. The area where phase 2 is planned must be landscaped for erosion control until phase 2 is constructed. Streets/Access Hennepin County has reviewed the application and has provided comments noting that there is only a 40-foot ½ right-of-way for County Road 116, where a 60-foot ½ right-of-way is planned and they have requested that this area be preserved. The applicant is requesting a 16-foot setback from the property line, which means that the eastern row of parking would need to be acquired to obtain the desired right-of-way for future expansion. The County policy is to require a 50/50 cost split between the City and County for acquisition. Staff notes that the Southeast District Plan (Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance) was developed with Hennepin County using a Hennepin County grant. During that process, the City and County acknowledged the challenges of widening County Road 116 between County Road 10 and Larkin Road. The ordinance says, “Where County Road 116 passes through the Town Center, this road should shift to the east to allow for a center landscaped boulevard and other enhancements that will express a sense of Town Center identity”. Shifting the right-of-way east would help existing businesses remain; however, the City should work to maintain minimum setbacks where possible. NAPA CUP, SP and Variance (21-004) 6 May 27, 2021 Additionally, the County has expressed concern about the location of the eastern drive access so close to the intersection as it could cause a backup onto County Road 116. This would only be acerbated if the County were to add a turn lane on County Road 116 at 75th Avenue. While this turn lane could be added within the existing right-of-way, it would further shrink the distance for vehicles turning off County Road 116 and trying to enter the site. Semi-trucks would not be able to make this turn and will be required to enter the site from the west. The site currently has two curb cuts off 75th Avenue. Section 1060.060 of the Zoning Ordinance would allow only one driveway access for this use based on lot width. However, the applicant is proposing two access points generally located where the existing accesses are located. The eastern access would be a full access and the western access would be exit only. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and recommends that the eastern driveway be shifted east to eliminate the angled access that is currently shown on the plans. While this does bring the intersection closer to the CR 116/75th Avenue intersection, the City Engineer believes it will provide safer movements. We have included conditions in the draft resolutions to address these items. Utilities Sanitary sewer and water were stubbed to the site from 75th Avenue as part of the downtown improvement project. Lighting The applicant has submitted a photometric plan that appears to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant must provide information about the poles and base of the freestanding light fixtures for staff review. It appears the fixtures will be 22 feet high, which would comply with the ordinance standard of either 30 feet or the roofline of the principal building, whichever is less. Detail sheets were provided for the proposed lighting fixtures for the property and all provide the 90 degree cutoff as required. The light poles are shown in the parking stalls and must be relocated to an area behind the curb or be placed in an island to protect the fixtures. Parks and Trails The Comprehensive Plan shows a future on-road trail running along County Road 116. The on-road trail will be constructed by the County when the road is improved. This property is not being subdivided; therefore, park dedication is not required. Stormwater Management Ponding is planned for the northern portion of the site. The ponding must provide treatment and rate control. The applicant has addressed many of the concerns of the City Engineer, but a few remain which are noted in the City Engineer’s memo. NAPA CUP, SP and Variance (21-004) 7 May 27, 2021 The applicant must obtain final approval from the City and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission before any site grading or activity may commence. Conditional Use Permit The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow “Automobile Retail (tires, batteries, etc. No body work or repair work)” for the new NAPA Auto Parts. Section 1040.100, Subd. 4 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the landowner to request a CUP if they comply with the Conditional Use Permit standards in Section 1070.020 of the Zoning Ordinance. Specifically: A. Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. The proposed auto retail use is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated on this site by the Comprehensive Plan. It will also be consistent with Goal 1, Policy 1 of the Economic Competitiveness chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to “Support efforts to retain existing businesses and facilitate their expansion”. B. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community. The use is allowed within the C-1 district. C. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The new business is a conditional use in the C-1 district and conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with ordinance standards. D. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. E. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Municipal sewer and water are available to the site. If the setback variance to County Road 116 is granted, it may impact future improvements to County Road 116. NAPA CUP, SP and Variance (21-004) 8 May 27, 2021 F. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. G. The conditional use and site conforms to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. Parking Setback Variance The applicant’s narrative requests a variance to allow a 16-foot setback from County Road 116 where 100 feet is required. Section 1060.070 allows the applicant to reduce the parking setback to 25 feet if additional landscaping is provided. However, the applicant cannot meet even this reduced 25-foot setback with the size of building proposed and the required parking. • The City Council must consider whether the variance standards have been met. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The applicant has revised the landscape plan and will be required to update all plans to show the 16-foot parking setback. This change to the plans allows the curb, retaining wall and landscaping to be located outside the City’s 10-foot drainage and utility easement as requested by staff. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all of the following criteria have been met: 1. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance with the proposed building on this 1.51-acre site. The applicant has reduced the building size 6 feet in depth from the original submittal to try to reduce the impact of the variance. The size of this site with two street frontages does limit the developable area on site However, a smaller building could be constructed, which would require less parking, and could comply with setback requirements. If the building 71 feet deep rather than 80 feet deep, the required parking setbacks could be met. Industry standards suggest that 50-60 feet deep (20 feet wide) is typical for retail spaces. 2. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The site is a corner lot with two front yards. If the east lot line were a side lot line instead of a front lot line a 10-foot setback would be required. NAPA CUP, SP and Variance (21-004) 9 May 27, 2021 However, staff notes that there are many other corner lots in the City that are subject to the same restrictions and the 1.51 acre site is a rectangular site with no unique physical characteristics. 3. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Granting the setback variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. All of the lots between this site and County Road 10 appear to be non-conforming regarding setbacks to County Road 116. Allowing redevelopment of the site would reduce the parking setback along County Road 116 from approximately 28 feet to 16 feet. This will make it more difficult and costly for Hennepin County to make improvements to County Road 116 in the future. 4. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The proposed setback variance would be similar to the properties to the north. However, staff notes that the adopted 100-foot setback along major roadways is to provide green corridors adjacent to these street and allows a reduction in the setback to the standard street setback requirement only where additional landscaping is provided. 5. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow development that is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated in the comprehensive plan. 6. The City may impose conditions on the variance to address the impact of the variance. If the City approves the variance, staff recommends that all plans be updated to match the landscape plan with the 16,000 sq. ft. building and 16-foot setback on the east. 5. Recommendation The City Council should choose one of the two options: a. Move to adopt Resolution 2021-53 approving the site plan and conditional use permit and denying the variance, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Or b. Move to adopt Resolution 2021-53 approving the site plan, conditional use permit and variance. NAPA CUP, SP and Variance (21-004) 10 May 27, 2021 Attachments 1. Resolution 2021-53approving the site plan and conditional use permit and denying the variance 2. Resolution 2021-53 approving the site plan, conditional use permit and variance. 3. Site Location Map 4. Engineer’s memo dated May 17, 2021 5. Hennepin County Comments date March 10, 2021 6. Public Safety Comments dated February 3, 2021 7. Applicant’s Narrative dated May 6, 2021 8. REVISED Plans dated May 6, 2021 9. Lighting Plans dated January 19, 2021 and details dated March 8, 2021 10. Color Samples dated March 8, 2021 City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DENIAL OF THE VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19905 75TH AVENUE NORTH (PID 26-119- 23-11-0040) (CITY FILE NO. 21-004) WHEREAS, Kinghorn Construction (“the applicant”) is requesting approval of a site plan, conditional use permit and variance to allow automobile retail in the C-1 (neighborhood commercial) district and a setback variance on property legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 3, Countryside Plaza 2nd Addition WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan, conditional use permit and variance at a duly called public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A site plan and conditional use permit are approved to allow for the construction of a 12,800 sq. ft. building addition as shown on application and plans received by the City on January 19, 2021, additional information received on March 8, 2021, March 18, 2021 and March 25, 2021 and revisions received May 6, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. No approvals are granted for the phase 2 building or the drive-through. Drive-through businesses require a separate conditional use permit. A new application for a site plan amendment will be required prior to issuance of building permits for that tenant space and a new conditional use permit will be required if a drive-through is proposed. 3. The applicant must comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated May 17, 2021. 4. The applicant must comply with the Public Safety Plan Review comments dated February 4, 2021: a. Show off site hydrant locations. b. Work with fire department for FDC connection prior to construction. 5. The variance for a 16-foot setback where 25 feet from County Road 116 is required per Section 1060.070 is denied based on the following findings: a. There are no practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance setback requirements on this 1.51-acre site. The applicant could reduce the building depth to 71 feet and comply with the parking setback requirements. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 Page 2 of 5 b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are not unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were created by the landowner’s proposed building. A smaller building could be designed to comply with ordinance requirements for this new development. c. Granting the setback variance will alter the essential character of the locality and could create a precedent for future development and redevelopment along this corridor and make improvements to County Road 116 more difficult in the future. d. The proposed variance would not be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The adopted 100-foot setback along major roadways is to provide green corridors adjacent to these street and allows a reduction to a 25-foot parking setback only where additional landscaping is provided. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow development that is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated in the comprehensive plan. Additionally, it supports Goal 2, Policy 1, in the Economic Competitiveness chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to “Support efforts to retain existing businesses and facilitate their expansion”. f. The variance is denied and the applicant must revise all plan sheets to comply with the 25-foot parking setback from County Road 116. 6. A conditional use permit is approved, subject to the finding that the applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance have been met. Specifically: a. The proposed use complies with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed auto retail use is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated on this site by the Comprehensive Plan. It will also be consistent with Goal 1, Policy 1 of the Economic Competitiveness chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to “Support efforts to retain existing businesses and facilitate their expansion”. b. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community. The use is allowed within the C-1 district. c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The new business is a conditional use in the C-1 district and conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with ordinance standards. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. e. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Municipal sewer and water are available to the site. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 Page 3 of 5 f. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. g. The conditional use and site conforms to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. 7. The plans shall be updated to provide colors for the accent band on the building. 8. The trash enclosure materials shall be consistent with the precast panels on the principal building. The plans shall be updated to provide the proposed precast color. 9. Mechanical equipment must be screened from view in a way that is integral to the architecture of the building. This equipment may not be located in the front yard. The plans must be revised to show compliance. 10. All parking and drive areas shall have a perimeter of poured, cast in place concrete curb. The plans shall be revised accordingly. 11. The western drive shall be exit only and shall be signed accordingly. The access width shall be limited as outlined in the City Engineer’s memo. 12. The eastern access shall be relocated and sized as outlined in the City Engineer’s memo. 13. Truck traffic shall be required to enter the site from the west and use the east access for entry. 14. All signage shall comply with the standards in Chapter 84. a. The freestanding sign shall be located outside of sight visibility triangle and shall comply with the 10-foot setback from all property lines. b. The freestanding sign does not comply with the design standard and must be revised as monument sign or a pylon sign that meets the base requirements, which requires pole structures to be wrapped with materials to match the building and equal 60% of the sign width. c. Wall signage is only permitted on the east elevation. The proposed signage on the north and south elevation is not permitted. d. Signage must show compliance with the lighting standards in Section 84.04, Subd. 8 of the sign ordinance. e. All signs require a permit in order to be constructed and will be reviewed at the time of permit submittal. 15. A revised lighting plan is required to be submitted for review and approval by the City. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 Page 4 of 5 a. The plans shall be revised to show lighting fixtures that are limited to be either 30 ft. or the roofline of the principal building, whichever is less. b. Details about the light pole and base shall be provided to ensure compliance with height limits. c. Light poles shall be located outside of the parking areas by being placed behind the curb or in a landscaped island. 16. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to show the following as required by Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance: a. Irrigation is required for all non-residential development. An irrigation plan must be provided. b. Landscaping on the east side of the property must be revised to provide shrub landscaping along the length of the parking area to screen vehicle headlights to a height of at least 3 feet. c. Provide City of Corcoran Landscape details. d. The area where phase 2 is planned must be landscaped for erosion control. The plans must be revised for City review and approval. 17. Trees, ponds, curb, retaining and other private improvements shall located outside of the public street easement and drainage and utility easement. a. If the City determines that encroachments are necessary, the applicant will be required to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City. b. The encroachment agreement must be recorded at Hennepin County. 18. Easements over the stormwater pond are required and must be provided to the City in recordable form. 19. A stormwater management agreement must be executed and recorded. 20. A building permit is required prior to beginning construction. 21. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: a. The applicant shall submit any and all necessary permits to the watershed and receive approval and shall provide proof of permits to the City. b. The developer shall enter into a site improvement agreement and submit a financial guarantee for the proposed work as outlined in Section 1070.050, Subd. 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. c. A complete set of revised plans shall be submitted showing compliance with the approval conditions in this resolution. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 Page 5 of 5 d. Record the approving resolution, the stormwater management agreement and stormwater easement at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. 22. FURTHER, any request to inspect the required landscaping in order to reduce financial guarantees must be accompanied by recertification/verification of field inspection by the project landscape architect. A letter signed by the project landscape architect verifying plantings have been corrected and is in compliance with the plans and specifications will suffice. 23. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use and completes the required improvements. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of May 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19905 75TH AVENUE NORTH (PID 26-119-23-11-0040) (CITY FILE NO. 21-004) WHEREAS, Kinghorn Construction (“the applicant”) is requesting approval of a site plan, conditional use permit and variance to allow automobile retail in the C-1 (neighborhood commercial) district and a setback variance on property legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 3, Countryside Plaza 2nd Addition WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan, conditional use permit and variance at a duly called public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. A site plan and conditional use permit are approved to allow for the construction of a 12,800 sq. ft. building addition as shown on application and plans received by the City on January 19, 2021, additional information received on March 8, 2021, March 18, 2021 and March 25, 2021 and revisions received May 6, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. No approvals are granted for the phase 2 building or the drive-through. Drive-through businesses require a separate conditional use permit. A new application for a site plan amendment will be required prior to issuance of building permits for that tenant space and a new conditional use permit will be required if a drive-through is proposed. 3. The applicant must comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated May 17, 2021. 4. The applicant must comply with the Public Safety Plan Review comments dated February 4, 2021: a. Show off site hydrant locations. b. Work with fire department for FDC connection prior to construction. 5. The variance for a 16-foot setback where 100 feet is required from County Road 116 is approved based on the following findings: a. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance with the proposed building on this 1.51-acre site. The applicant has reduced the building size 6 feet in depth from the original submittal to try to reduce the impact of the variance. The size of this site with two street frontages does limit the developable area on site City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 Page 2 of 5 b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The site is a corner lot with two front yards. If the east lot line were a side lot line instead of a front lot line a 10-foot setback would be required. c. Granting the setback variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. All of the lots between this site and County Road 10 appear to be non-conforming regarding setbacks to County Road 116. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The proposed setback variance would be similar to the properties to the north. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would allow development that is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated in the comprehensive plan. Additionally, it supports Goal 2, Policy 1, in the Economic Competitiveness chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to “Support efforts to retain existing businesses and facilitate their expansion”. 6. A conditional use permit is approved, subject to the finding that the applicable criteria as outlined in Section 1070.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Corcoran Zoning Ordinance have been met. Specifically: a. The proposed use complies with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed auto retail use is consistent with the commercial uses anticipated on this site by the Comprehensive Plan. It will also be consistent with Goal 1, Policy 1 of the Economic Competitiveness chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to “Support efforts to retain existing businesses and facilitate their expansion”. b. The establishment of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort of the community. The use is allowed within the C-1 district. c. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The new business is a conditional use in the C-1 district and conditions have been proposed to ensure compliance with ordinance standards. d. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. e. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the proposed use. Municipal sewer and water are available to the site. f. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Staff has proposed draft conditions to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 Page 3 of 5 g. The conditional use and site conforms to performance standards as specified by this Chapter. Staff has analyzed the performance standards of this Chapter and has included conditions to ensure compliance with the performance standards. 7. The plans shall be updated to provide colors for the accent band on the building. 8. The trash enclosure materials shall be consistent with the precast panels on the principal building. The plans shall be updated to provide the proposed precast color. 9. Mechanical equipment must be screened from view in a way that is integral to the architecture of the building. This equipment may not be located in the front yard. The plans must be revised to show compliance. 10. All parking and drive areas shall have a perimeter of poured, cast in place concrete curb. The plans shall be revised accordingly. 11. The western drive shall be exit only and shall be signed accordingly. The access width shall be limited as outlined in the City Engineer’s memo. 12. The eastern access shall be relocated and sized as outlined in the City Engineer’s memo. 13. Truck traffic shall be required to enter the site from the west and use the east access for entry. 14. All signage shall be revised to comply with the standards in Chapter 84. a. The freestanding sign shall be located outside of sight visibility triangle and shall comply with the 10-foot setback from all property lines. b. The freestanding sign does not comply with the design standard and must be revised as monument sign or a pylon sign that meets the base requirements, which requires pole structures to be wrapped with materials to match the building and equal 60% of the sign width. c. Wall signage is only permitted on the east elevation. The proposed signage on the north and south elevation is not permitted. d. Signage must show compliance with the lighting standards in Section 84.04, Subd. 8 of the sign ordinance. e. All signs require a permit in order to be constructed and will be reviewed at the time of permit submittal. 15. A revised lighting plan is required to be submitted for review and approval by the City. a. The plans shall be revised to show lighting fixtures that are limited to be either 30 ft. or the roofline of the principal building, whichever is less. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 Page 4 of 5 b. Details about the light pole and base shall be provided to ensure compliance with height limits. c. Light poles shall be located outside of the parking areas by being placed behind the curb or in a landscaped island. 16. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to show the following as required by Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance: a. Irrigation is required for all non-residential development. An irrigation plan must be provided. b. Landscaping on the east side of the property must be revised to provide shrub landscaping along the length of the parking area to screen vehicle headlights to a height of at least 3 feet. c. Provide City of Corcoran Landscape details. d. The area where phase 2 is planned must be landscaped for erosion control. The plans must be revised for City review and approval. 17. Trees, ponds, curb, retaining and other private improvements shall located outside of the public street easement and drainage and utility easement. a. If the City determines that encroachments are necessary, the applicant will be required to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City. b. The encroachment agreement must be recorded at Hennepin County. 18. Easements over the stormwater pond are required and must be provided to the City in recordable form. 19. A stormwater management agreement must be executed and recorded. 20. A building permit is required prior to beginning construction. 21. FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to issuance of building permits: a. The applicant shall submit any and all necessary permits to the watershed and receive approval and shall provide proof of permits to the City. b. The developer shall enter into a site improvement agreement and submit a financial guarantee for the proposed work as outlined in Section 1070.050, Subd. 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. c. A complete set of revised plans shall be submitted showing compliance with the approval conditions in this resolution. d. Record the approving resolution, the stormwater management agreement and stormwater easement at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 Page 5 of 5 22. FURTHER, any request to inspect the required landscaping in order to reduce financial guarantees must be accompanied by recertification/verification of field inspection by the project landscape architect. A letter signed by the project landscape architect verifying plantings have been corrected and is in compliance with the plans and specifications will suffice. 23. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant commences the authorized use and completes the required improvements. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of May 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Hennepin County Property Map Date: 3/24/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 100 feet PARCEL ID: 2611923110040 OWNER NAME: Reh Auto Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 19905 75th Ave N, Corcoran MN 55340 PARCEL AREA: 1.51 acres, 65,729 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: $495,000 SALE DATA: 03/2020 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $425,000 TAX TOTAL: $19,457.40 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $495,000 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: NAPA – Site Plan Review Date: May 17, 2021 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents by Anderson Engineering: 1. Civil Plans, Planning Commission Drawings, Revision 2, 5/6/2021. 2. Preliminary Storm Water Management Plan for NAPA Auto Corcoran, 3/15/21 marked “Preliminary”. 3. Landscape Plan, Planning Commission Drawings, Revision dated 5/6/21. 4. Project Narrative, Proposed NAPA Store Facility, (Kinghorn Company), 5/6/2021. Comments: General: 1. Consistent with the review process, a comment response letter shall be provided in response to the following comments provided in this Memorandum in which the applicant provides a written response to each item. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the proposed plans are subject to addition planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. 3. For any site activity (demo, grading, utilities, etc.) no closures or restrictions of any kind shall be imposed upon the public use of 75th Ave N. without the City’s permission. o Should any lane restrictions be necessary, the Contractor shall notify the City at least seven days in advance and provide a Traffic Control Plan. 4. The property owner shall own and maintain the stormwater infrastructure. A stormwater maintenance agreement will be required. 5. Curb and Gutter and retaining wall should be placed outside of the D&U Easement. If encroachments are determined necessary for site plan, an encroachment agreement will be necessary for the infrastructure within the easements. 6. Lighting is shown on the site plan. Light posts are shown within the parking lot. Poles should be moved to be outside of the actual parking spaces to avoid conflicts with vehicles. Erosion Control/SWPPP 1. Preparation of and compliance with a SWPPP shall be required for construction. A copy of the MPCA construction permit shall be provided to the City prior to any disturbance activities. 2. The City of Corcoran is an MS4 City and site visits will be conducted weekly. May 17, 2021 NAPA Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 4 Transportation 1. Delivery truck access to the site should be limited to the west on 75 th Ave N. based on the vehicle movements shown by the applicant. 2. With restricting truck access to only the west, the eastern entrance shall be moved east to properly align with the drive aisle. A copy of a schematic access scenario is shown below of what the City recommends for consideration. If adopted, the applicant shall ensure the design meets all applicable standards. 3. The eastern entrance to the site shall be no greater than 32’ as is the maximum size allowed without a variance. This shall be measured at the end of the radius points within the site. As the site is not 250’ wide allowing for two access points, the western access aisle shall be no larger than what exists today measured at the end radius point into the site. 4. Radii at entrances to be no greater than 30’ per City standards. 5. Drive access widths at the ROW are shown larger than City standards and shall be shown per City standards. 6. The drive aprons into the site shall be per the City standards details. May 17, 2021 NAPA Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 4 7. Snow storage is proposed within the stormwater filtration basin. Snow storage should be provided elsewhere on the site as there are anticipated to be a significant amount of fine material within the snow which would impact the stormwater filtration BMP. a. No snow storage location noted. 8. The western entrance shall be marked with “Do Not Enter” signage as it is a one-way access. Site Plans 1. The existing and proposed drainage and utility easements shown shall be clearly labeled on all plan drawings. 2. The proposed aggregate shouldering at the entrance appears to be beyond what existed previously. This should be reviewed with the revised entrance to ensure aggregate shouldering is appropriate. Grading /Stormwater 1. Site disturbance is identified as over an acre which will require the site to comply with MPCA and Elm Creek WMO requirements in addition to City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines. Final approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission must be attained before any site grading or activity may commence. 2. City recommends considering a NURP pond with filtration shelf, which provide more efficient pretreatment and also save maintenance costs for the landowner. o Filtration basin section to comply with City detail. o City will provide updated details for filtration basin and filtration trench (DT swale detail) 3. A majority of the site discharges to the County ditch and the City is requesting rates be lowered as much as feasible. In order to achieve this, the City will allow flexibility in freeboard (to increase attenuation) as follows; o Adjust outlet control to target a 100-year HWL of 978, which still provides 2.5 feet of freeboard to low floor. o Submit revised flows (model printout) for all events and coordinate with City Engineer. 4. An easement shall be provided over all stormwater components and access routes. 5. Label the HWL and NWL of the stormwater BMP on the grading plans. 6. Revise western drainage swale to ensure 2% minimum drainage is maintained. o Call out high point along western drainage swale. Appears 2% drainage is not met. 7. Outlet control structure to comply with City detail; o OCS inlet side filled with concrete, revise to match City detail. May 17, 2021 NAPA Kevin Mattson Page 4 of 4 Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. Design slopes on the sewer service line should be provided on the drawings. Other Comments: 1. The applicant shall provide the City a detailed work schedule. The City shall be provided at least 48-hour notice prior to any work commencing, including grading and utility work. End of Comments From:Jason D Gottfried To:Natalie Davis; Michael Pritchard; Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Kevin Mattson; mgottschalk@ci.corcoran.mn.us; rburns@ci.corcoran.mn.us; Kent Torve; Matthew A Bolterman Cc:Ashley Morello Subject:RE: [External] Distribution #21-004 NAPA - CUP & Variance Date:Tuesday, March 9, 2021 2:23:46 PM Attachments:RE External Distribution 21-004 Napa - Site Plan-CUP-Variance.msg Hello Natalie, Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Unfortunately, it appears as though all of our same concerns originally expressed (02/12 – attached) remain with the revised plans: Short-term: Operationally, we would prefer to avoid the outbound traffic entering right at 75th Ave compounding confusion and delay at the intersection (75th/CR 116) Long-term: Our envisioned future right-of-way needs for this corridor are 60-foot half, which are 20’ beyond the existing property line. Adding parking here 10 feet from the property line could potentially result in future compensation (50% split county/city) on a reconstruction project for County Road 116. We encourage the city to work with the applicant to modify the site plan to avoid this potential situation. Thanks again, please let me know if I can assist in anyway to rectify these concerns Jason Jason Gottfried Transportation Planner Transportation Planning Office: 612-596-0394 Cell: 612-719-8073jason.gottfried@hennepin.usHennepin County Public Works1600 Prairie DriveMedina, MN 55340(working remotely) From: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:31 AM To: Michael Pritchard <MPritchard@corcoranmn.gov>; Kendra Lindahl <klindahl@landform.net>; Kevin Mattson <kmattson@ci.corcoran.mn.us>; mgottschalk@ci.corcoran.mn.us; rburns@ci.corcoran.mn.us; Jason D Gottfried <Jason.Gottfried@hennepin.us>; Kent Torve <ktorve@wenck.com>; Matthew A Bolterman <Matthew.Bolterman@hennepin.us> Cc: Ashley Morello <Ashley.Morello@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Distribution #21-004 NAPA - CUP & Variance Please find attached the revised plans for NAPA’s CUP and Variance request. This project is tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission review on April 1, 2021. We ask that you please provide comments no later than March 19, 2021. Thank you, Natalie Davis Planner City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 www.ci.corcoran.mn.us ndavis@corcoranmn.gov Direct: 763-258-4272 Main: 763-420-2288 City of Corcoran - A Hidden Gem Waiting To Be Discovered ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message from your computer system. CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us Memo To: Planning (Planner Lindahl) From: Lieutenant Ryan Burns Date: February 4, 2021 Re: Public Safety Plan Review A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on 02/03/2021 in attendance were: Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Fire Chief Feist, Fire Chief Dave Malewicki, Fire Chief Leuer, Building Inspector Todd Geske, and Construction Services Coordinator Pritchard. The following are comments from the meeting: Scherber Garages 1. Fire truck access around building E on the West side, to the North, then to the East past building C , to the South creating a perimeter road or a loop for fire department tankers. 2. 26 foot access between buildings A and B. 3. Show turning radius for 40 foot fire trucks between buildings B and C, and D and E without a looped connection. 4. Private driveway to be 26 feet wide to meet fire code. Allows traffic to pass. Roadway to be asphalt, built to city 9 ton specification. 5. Grade of private driveway to be reviewed by engineering and fire department before construction. Napa Property 1. On site hydrant if not connected to city water. 2. Show off site hydrant locations. 3. Work with fire department for F.D.C connection prior to construction. This memo serves as a preliminary review and assumes that all specifications not articulated in the concept meet City standards. Additional fire and building codes will apply. Page 1 of 2 May 6, 2021 (Revised) Project Narrative Contact: Chuck Edwards Proposed Napa Store facility Project Development 19905 75th Avenue Cell (612) 282-5424 Corcoran, MN 55374 Ofc (763) 428-8088 REH Auto LLC (Julie and Ronnie Reh) are proposing to move their current NAPA business at 1990 County Road 10, Corcoran to the new address 19905 75th Avenue in Corcoran. They are seeking a conditional use permit (CUP) from the City of Corcoran, MN for developing the 1.51-acre site. They own the property. It is zoned C1 Neighborhood Commercial, and no zoning change is required. There is no outside storage proposed for this site. Building is sprinkled. The purpose of the CUP request is to allow REH Auto LLC to construct a NAPA store with a design for their retail space plus two small rental spaces which would allow them future expansion opportunities without having to adding on to the building at later time. An overall draft site plan and building rendering is included in the submission package attached to this request. We are requesting a variance for Parking set back of 10’ from County Rd 116. We will be meeting the Variance Standards Ordinance according to Section 1060.070, Subd. 2(K and L) with additional provided landscaping. We will be providing one overstory deciduous tree, one overstory coniferous tree, two ornamental trees and 10 understory shrubs per 100ft. of the length of the property line where the flexibility is requested. The parking and building setback variance that we are requesting allows the property to be used for its highest and best use. The project will not alter the essential character of the locality but enhance both the usefulness and convenience for the local population. We believe it is consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan and is in harmony with the community at large. Here in Corcoran, NAPA has become an integral and necessary retail supplier of replacement parts and tools for the surrounding community. The parking requirements and necessary size of the building are designed as efficiently as they can be for the external / internal use and product flow which dictated the resulting need for the parking and building variance. NAPA has been a member of the community for 30+ years and is attempting to upgrade the entrance to development by repurposing the property and tearing down the existing pole building and replacing it with a more attractive and efficient precast building within the constraints of the unique existing property. The site plan details the proposed layout and location of the building, setbacks, retention pond, street accesses, asphalt paved areas, etc. The property has city sewer and water. The existing well will be capped and the septic removed. Existing building/parking lot will be demo’ d and removed. The colored rendering print shows in draft form what the proposed building would look like. When we originally presented this project to the Planning Commission the proposed building was 16,400 square feet (80’ X 200’ plus 20’ X 20’ dock area with 12’ X 12’ Overhead garage door, No loading dock) with NAPA occupying 12,400 square feet to begin with and have two 2,000 square foot rental spaces. The retail area of the NAPA operation will be on the south facing part of the building facing 75th Ave with the area behind being their stock/warehousing area. Initially the rental spaces will not be built out but will have storefront glass and doors with exit service doors at the rear of each space. The NAPA portion will have a show room area with service counter between the Page 2 of 2 Showroom and stock area. As shown on the plan there will be store front glass and glass entry doors. Included in the NAPA space is two offices, bathrooms, breakroom, maintenance/electrical room, and sprinkler room. The building is constructed with precast concrete panels. There is a trash enclosure on the rear of the building that will have gates and a roof. There is a sign shown on the plans in south east area of the site. From the discussion that took place during the planning meeting we have revised the building to reflect issues discussed. The revised plan reduces the project to 12,800 square feet (80’ X 160’) to build now and we also eliminated the 20’ X 20’ bump out (400 sq ft) on the west side of the building. We are showing a future addition of two retail spaces 80’ X 40’ on the north side of the building. We have eliminated the drive thru option for this phase 1. The Reh’s have built several NAPA stores and have a good understanding of the efficiencies they need in this building i.e., pallet racking, upper mezzanine layout along with the employee pick time for customers etc. The entire purpose of this building was to make it as functional as possible which they cannot do in their current location. Corporate NAPA has suggested ‘planagrams’ which the Reh’s have not been able to implement in their current building and definitely want to take advantage of in the new facility. This revised layout will work for both inventory placement and our ability to serve the needs of our customers. The civil drawings demonstrate the traffic flow on the site. They average one semi-truck per day that will enter on the east and go around the building and then back up to the garage door for unloading and then exit from the west entrance onto 75th Avenue. This was designed so that trucks were not backing onto the site from the street. The rest of their daily traffic is cars and pickup trucks. The site is designed for a drive through window on the north end of the building with stacking considered. At this point no tenant recruiting has been done. The site plan also shows the engineered ponding necessary for the project with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Narrative. NAPA business hours are Monday thru Friday 7 AM to 8 PM. Saturday 8 AM to 5 PM. Currently closed on Sundays. They will have 9 full time and 9 part time employees. There is no sound control plan because they will not have any exterior PA systems, nor will they have equipment working outside that could generate noise. The only sounds will be generated by the traffic coming onto the site. PLOTTED:COMM. NO. DRAWING NO. 10/12/2020 15897 NAPA AUTO 1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . # 1 0 0 Plymouth, MN 55441 | a e-mn .com P 763.412.4000 | F 763.412.4090 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC DRAWING TITLE CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED: IJWMAMIJW 12/15/2020 REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO. DATE 19905 75TH AVENUE CORCORAN, MN KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION PLANNING COMMISSION IAN J. WEBER, PE 55502 PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:LICENSE NO.12/15/2020 CITY COMMENTS12/10/21 CITY COMMENTS23/5/21 BUILDING SIZE REDUCTION35/6/21 DEMOLITION PLAN C-1 0 20' 40'NPROPERTY LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING FENCE EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING HYDRANT AND GV EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING STORM SEWER INLET SAW CUT REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT REMOVE TREE KEYNOTES LEGEND PROTECT TREE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE ALONG DRIP LINE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. (TYP.) REMOVE EXISTING TREE. DEMO EXISTING BUILDING AND FOUNDATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM BUILDING DEMOLITION FROM SITE. REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SAWCUT PAVEMENT AT REMOVAL LIMITS. REMOVE EXISTING SEPTIC TANK AND MOUND PER MPCA STANDARDS. REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS WALKWAY TO PROPERTY LINE. REMOVE OR RELOCATE EXISTING ELECTRIC AND GAS LINES AS NECESSARY FOR NEW ELECTRICAL AND GAS CONNECTION. COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES FOR RELOCATION AND DEMOLITION EFFORTS. PROTECT OR RELOCATE EXISTING TRANSFORMER. REMOVE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN AND FOOTINGS REMOVE EXISTING CULVERT. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. REMOVE EXISTING AIR CONDITIONING UNITS PROTECT EXISTING ADJACENT RETAINING WALLS TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING 6" WATER SERVICE AS NECESSARY FOR FIRE AND WATER SERVICE INSTALLATION (7.5 LF APPROX.) 1. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN BASED ON A SURVEY PERFORMED BY ANDERSON ENGINEERING DATED 8/24/2020. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2018 EDITION OF MNDOT STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (INCLUDING ANY SUPPLEMENTS), AS APPLICABLE. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF CORCORAN, ELM CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT, MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, AND HENNEPIN COUNTY PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 4. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SOIL ENGINEER UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROLS. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM ALL THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POST ALL BONDS, PAY ALL FEE, PROVIDE PROOF OF INSURANCE, AND PROVIDE ANY NECESSARY TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR THE WORK. 8. CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE SAW CUT IN FULL SECTIONS. 9. ALL WORK TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN A LEGAL MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 11. VERIFY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. 12. PHASE DEMOLITION AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES FOR MINIMAL DISRUPTION. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OFF-SITE ALL DEMOLITION ITEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. 14. PATCH IN-KIND ALL DISTURBED PAVEMENTS & CURBS. 15. STREET SWEEP TO PREVENT DIRT AND DEBRIS ENTERING INTO TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND EXISTING PARKING LOT, INCLUDING ADJACENT WALKS AND ROADWAYS, MINIMUM DAILY. MAINTAIN CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PRACTICES. 16. PROTECT EXISTING ELEMENTS TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR DAMAGES AT NO COST TO OWNER. DEMOLITION NOTES 1. FOR ANY SITE ACTIVITY (DEMO, GRADING, UTILITIES, ETC.) NO CLOSURES OR RESTRICTIONS OF ANY KIND SHALL BE IMPOSED UPON THE PUBLIC USE OF 75TH AVE WITHOUT THE CITY'S PERMISSION. SHOULD ANY LANE RESTRICTIONS BE NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE, AND PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. 2. THE CITY OF CORCORAN WILL MAKE WEEKLY SITE VISITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A MS4 CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF CORCORAN NO LESS THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION TO SCHEDULE WEEKLY VISITS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY OF CORCORAN A DETAILED WORK SCHEDULE NO LESS THAN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE DETAILED SCHEDULE SHALL INCLUDE GRADING AND UTILITY ACTIVITIES; IN ADDITIONAL TO OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE CITY SHALL BE GIVEN FORTY EIGHT (48) HOURS NOTICE IN ADVANCE OF THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE START OF THE GRADING AND UTILITY PHASES, AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENCING SHOULD ANY STOP IN WORK EXCEEDING SEVEN (7) DAYS OCCUR. CITY OF CORCORAN NOTES DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT COCO NAPA BUILDING FFE = 980.5±COCOCO981 980 97 9 97 8 9 7 7 97 6 97 5980979979980979978977976 974 973 97297997797897998097 9978977977976978 978977978 977 976 975 974 975 976 977978 975976977978978 979.99 979.99 980.36 979.87 980.04 980.50 980.50 980.50 978.65 978.82 979.78 979.12 979.63 979.24 979.48 979.09 978.94 978.97 979.10 978.94 978.93 978.54 978.15 978.93 979.10 ME 979.56 ME 977.84 RIM 974.50 RIM 974.50 INV 974.50 INV 972.50 980.34 B 979.28 T 979.32 B 977.00 T 979.06 B 976.50 EOF 977.20 979.81 979.53 979.35 979.51 980.50 980.36 979.38 979.40 979.96 980.04 978.13 978.11 978.22 978.20 980.07 980.04 980.20 ME 979.04 ME 978.69 ME 978.13 979.06 979.35 979.83 980.38 ME 978.22 ME 977.81 979.22 978.95 978.92 978.97 979.16 RIM 976.70 RIM 976.35 RIM 976.00 979979 980978975979 978 977 977978979 977 980INV 972.50 ME 976.93 ME 976.52 ME 976.04 ME 979.53 978.20 979.99 PLOTTED:COMM. NO. DRAWING NO. 10/2/2020 15897 NAPA AUTO 1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . # 1 0 0 Plymouth, MN 55441 | ae-mn .com P 763.412.4000 | F 763.412.4090 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC DRAWING TITLE CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED: IJWMAMIJW 12/15/2020 REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO. DATE 19905 75TH AVENUE CORCORAN, MN KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION PLANNING COMMISSION IAN J. WEBER, PE 55502 PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:LICENSE NO.12/15/2020 CITY COMMENTS12/10/21 CITY COMMENTS23/5/21 BUILDING SIZE REDUCTION35/6/21 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-2 0 20' 40'NPROPERTY LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION SOIL BORING LOCATION DRAINAGE ARROW PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CONCRETE C&G SILT FENCE BIOROLLS ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPOT ELEVATION FLOW LINE OF CURB HIGH POINT / FLOW LINE OF CURB RIM ELEVATION TOP OF WALL BOTTOM OF WALL 966 965 966 965 F/H 800.1 F 800.1 R 800.1 800.1 T 800.1 B 800.1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTES: 1. GRADING CONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES CALLED FOR ON THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE SILT FENCE, SEDIMENTATION BASINS OR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND SERVICEABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: A. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET B. SILT FENCE C. TEMPORARY CULVERTS D. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND OUTFALL FACILITIES E. SORMWATER POND CONSTRUCTION F. COMMON EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT (GRADING) G. SEED AND MULCH OR SOD H. BIO-ROLL BARRIERS IN FINISHED GRADED AREAS I. INLET AND OUTLET FACILITIES SUBSEQUENT TO STORM SEWER WORK 3. GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY AND NPDES PHASE II PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS. GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY. 4. ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. ANY TEMPORARY FACILITIES WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVED AS CALLED FOR ON THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE GRADING CONTRACTOR WHEN DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE THE SUBSEQUENTLY DISTURBED AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 5. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE THE SOILS ENGINEER SO THAT CERTIFICATION OF ALL CONTROLLED FILLS WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE OWNER DURING AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. 6. ALL DISTURBED AREAS, EXCEPT AREAS TO BE PAVED AND/OR SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED BY A LANDSCAPE PLAN, SHALL BE COVERED WITH A MINIMUM 6" OF TOP SOIL OR AS INDICATED IN SPECIFICATIONS OR LANDSCAPING PLAN. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED & MULCHED AT THE PRESCRIBED RATES WITHIN 72 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEED MIX:MNDOT NO. 25-141 59# / ACRE MULCH:TYPE 1 2 TONS / ACRE (DISK ANCHORED) FERTILIZER: TYPE 3 22-5-10 350# / ACRE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF ANY SURFACE WATER, MUST HAVE TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER FOR THE EXPOSED SOIL AREAS YEAR ROUND, ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING TABLE OF SLOPES AND TIME FRAMES: TYPE OF SLOPE TIME (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked) STEEPER THAN 3:1 7 DAYS 10:1 TO 3:1 4 DAYS FLATTER THAN 10:1 21 DAYS 7. THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND CONTOUR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WERE TAKEN FROM A PLAN FURNISHED BY OWNER. 8. CONTRACTORS GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL OPERATIONS SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. 9. IT IS REQUIRED THAT SOILS TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY MOTOR VEHICLES BE CLEANED DAILY FROM PAVED ROADWAY SURFACES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 10. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 11. ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LOCAL WATERSHED DISTRICT SHALL BE SATISFIED PER THE APPROVED PERMIT. 12. ALL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND IMPLEMENTED IN THE FIELD AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER SHALL CONFORM TO THE MPCA'S "PROTECTING WATER QUALITY IN URBAN AREAS: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR MINNESOTA". 13. DEWATERING AND / OR BASIN DRAINING DISCHARGE SHALL BE DIRECTED TO SEDIMENTATION BASINS WHEREVER POSSIBLE. ALL DISCHARGE POINTS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION & SCOUR THROUGH USE OF APPROVED ENERGY DISSIPATION DEVICES. 14. ALL SOLID WASTE / CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED / DISPOSED OF IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE RAPID STABILIZATION METHODS PER MNDOT 2575 AS NEEDED DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK TO MAINTAIN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY AND NPDES II PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THIS WORK SHALL CONSIST OF OPERATIONS NECESSARY TO RAPIDLY STABILIZE SMALL CRITICAL AREA, TO PREVENT OFF SITE SEDIMENTATION AND / OR TO COMPLY WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THE WORK MAY BE PERFORMED AT ANY TIME DURING THE CONTRACT AND DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THIS WORK WILL BE CONDUCTED ON SMALL AREAS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE ACCESSIBLE WITH NORMAL EQUIPMENT. THIS WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE MNDOT STANDARDS SPECIFICATIONS, THE DETAILS SHOWN IN THE PLANS, AND THE FOLLOWING: THERE ARE FIVE STABILIZATION METHODS APPROVED FOR THESE OPERATIONS. THESE METHODS MAY BE CONDUCTED INDEPENDENTLY OR IN COMBINATION. METHOD RAPID STABILIZATION 1 TYPE 1 MULCH WITH DISC ANCHORING 2 TYPE 3 MULCH WITH TYPE HYDRAULIC MULCH 3 TYPE HYDRAULIC MULCH WITH SEED MIXTURE 22-11 4 CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET WITH SEED MIXTURE 5 RIPRAP CLASS II WITH GEOTEXTILE TYPE III THESE EFFORTS WILL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE EROSION CONTROL BID ITEM. 16. CHANGE OF COVERAGE: FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WHERE THE OWNER OR OPERATOR CHANGES, (E.G., AN ORIGINAL DEVELOPER SELLS PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY TO VARIOUS BUILDERS) THE NEW OWNER OR OPERATOR MUST SUBMIT A SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ASSUMING TRANSFERS, SALE OR CLOSING ON THE PROPERTY. 17. INDIVIDUAL SITE BUILDERS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ANY AND ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED. REQUIRED ECM'S SHALL CONSIST OF BUT NOT BE LIMITED TOT HE FOLLOWING: A. STAKED FIBER LOG ROLLS AT BACK OF ALL CURB EXCEPT AT CONSTRUCTION / DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. B. SILT FENCE ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT SLOPES FROM CONSTRUCTION AREA. SILT FENCE SHALL HAVE THE BOTTOM DUG IN WITH SOIL FIRMLY COMPACTED. C. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HAVING 1" TO 2" CLEAR ROCK OVER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. D. STREET CLEANING AS MAY BE REQUIRED SHOULD VEHICLE TRACKING OCCUR. INDIVIDUAL SITE BUILDERS ARE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ECM'S UNTIL SUCH TIME AS INDIVIDUAL YARDS/VEGETATION ARE ESTABLISHED. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON SITE FOR CONSTRUCTION WASH OUT USE. TEMPORARY BASIN SHALL BE LOCATED AS TO PROVIDE EASY ACCESS FOR CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES AND CONCRETE TRUCKS AS NECESSARY. 19. INLET SEDIMENTATION CONTROL IS TO BE PROVIDED TO ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION . MEASURES APPLIED SHALL COMPLY WITH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR MINNESOTA AND APPLICATION OF NPDES PHASE II AS APPROPRIATE FOR PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SOIL LOSS DURING CONSTRUCTION DUE TO WIND EROSION THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. DUST SHALL BE SUPPRESSED THOUGH THE APPLICATIONS OF WATER, AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR THROUGH EQUIVALENT BMP'S AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 21. IF LEED ACCREDITATION IS APPLICABLE, CONTRACTOR SHALL DOCUMENT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN THROUGH DATE-STAMPED PHOTOS AND INSPECTION LOGS / REPORTS. REPORTS SHALL INCLUDE AT A MINIMUM DESCRIPTION OF ALL EMPLOYED BMP'S (INCLUDING BOTH MEASURES TO PREVENT SOIL LOSS DUE TO RUNOFF AND SOIL LOSS DUE TO WIND EROSION), BMP'S DEEMED UNNECESSARY DUE TO SITE CONDITIONS, CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO PROBLEMS, AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE CONDITION OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AS IT WAS ESTABLISHED AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SCHEDULE OF INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE ITEM INSTALLATION INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE REMOVAL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. INSPECT & MAINT. AFTER EACH RUN-OFF EVENT. REMOVE SEDIMENTS AS REQUIRED. AFTER TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA IS RESTORED. ROCK CONST. ENTRANCE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. INSPECT REGULARLY. MAINTAIN AS NEEDED.PRIOR TO PAVING. OUTLET SKIMMER STRUCTURE AFTER POND GRADING IS COMPLETED. INSPECT REGULARLY. MAINTAIN AS NEEDED.PERMANENT. RIP-RAP & FILTER UPON COMPLETION OF POND GRADING, CONC. SWALE CONST. AND OUTLET INSTALLATION. INSPECT & MAINTAIN AT LEAST ANNUALLY AND AFTER HEAVY RAINFALL EVENT. PERMANENT. DETENTION POND DURING EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. AFTER HEAVY RAINFALL EVENTS. REMOVE SEDIMENTS AS NEEDED.PERMANENT. SEED & MULCH AFTER POND GRADING IS COMPLETED. INSPECT & MAINTAIN AFTER HEAVY RAINS. REPLACE WASH-OUT AREAS IMMEDIATELY NO REMOVAL NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION UPON INLET CONSTRUCTING WHEN 1/3 CAPACITY OF BMP IS REACHED AFTER TRIBUTARY AREAS ARE FULLY RESTORED INSTALL & MAINTAIN SILT FENCE PERIMETER SEDIMENT PROTECTION ALONG PROPERTY LINE IN TURF AREAS. USE BIO-ROLLS AS NEED IN PAVED AREA FOR PHASING PURPOSES. SILT FENCE AND BIOROLLS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES INSTALL TEMP ROCK ENTRANCE AT CONSTRUCTION INGRESS & EGRESS LOCATION(S). INSTALL DITCH CHECKS EVERY 100 LF OF SWALE LENGTH (TYP.) INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET & SEED WITHIN STEEP SLOPE AREAS AND ALONG BOTTOM OF SWALES / DITCHES. BLANKET TO BE "NATURAL NET ONLY" CATEGORY 3N PER MNDOT SPEC 3885. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN BIOROLLS AROUND STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAS AS SOON AS BMP GRADING IS COMPLETE. REMOVE BIOROLLS ONLY AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING WATERSHED HAS BEEN FULLY ESTABLISHED. 1 2 3 4 5 KEYNOTES 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 LEGEND 1. FOR ANY SITE ACTIVITY (DEMO, GRADING, UTILITIES, ETC.) NO CLOSURES OR RESTRICTIONS OF ANY KIND SHALL BE IMPOSED UPON THE PUBLIC USE OF 75TH AVE WITHOUT THE CITY'S PERMISSION. SHOULD ANY LANE RESTRICTIONS BE NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE, AND PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. 2. THE CITY OF CORCORAN WILL MAKE WEEKLY SITE VISITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A MS4 CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF CORCORAN NO LESS THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION TO SCHEDULE WEEKLY VISITS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY OF CORCORAN A DETAILED WORK SCHEDULE NO LESS THAN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE DETAILED SCHEDULE SHALL INCLUDE GRADING AND UTILITY ACTIVITIES; IN ADDITIONAL TO OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE CITY SHALL BE GIVEN FORTY EIGHT (48) HOURS NOTICE IN ADVANCE OF THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE START OF THE GRADING AND UTILITY PHASES, AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENCING SHOULD ANY STOP IN WORK EXCEEDING SEVEN (7) DAYS OCCUR. CITY OF CORCORAN NOTES 3 DRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENTPHASE 2 TENANT SPACE FFE = 980.5± COCOCO NAPA BUILDING FFE = 980.5±COCOCO18.5'26'18.5'9'20'42.0'R3.4R9 . 0 R5 . 0 83.5R22.0 2 6 . 0R26.034'34'22'R18.0R30.0R3 0 . 0 26.17'R 4 6 . 5 PLOTTED:COMM. NO. DRAWING NO. 10/12/2020 15897 NAPA AUTO 1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . # 1 0 0 Plymouth, MN 55441 | ae-mn .com P 763.412.4000 | F 763.412.4090 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC DRAWING TITLE CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED: IJWMAMIJW 12/15/2020 REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO. DATE 19905 75TH AVENUE CORCORAN, MN KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION PLANNING COMMISSION IAN J. WEBER, PE 55502 PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:LICENSE NO.12/15/2020 CITY COMMENTS12/10/21 CITY COMMENTS23/5/21 BUILDING SIZE REDUCTION35/6/21 SITE AND UTILITY PLAN C-3 0 20' 40'N20 5 16 PROPERTY LIMITS BUILDING SETBACKS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE C&G PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT NO PARKING ZONE HANDICAP STALL DESIGNATION NUMBER OF PARKING STALL IN SECTION16 ADDRESS: 19905 75TH AVE N CORCORAN, MN 55374 PID:21611923110040 TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 65,729 SF, 1.51 AC TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE PROPOSED NAPA AUTO: 16,400 SF % OF BLDG. SF TO SITE: 16,400 / 65,729 = 24.95% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS PAVEMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE PROPOSED BITUMINOUS / CONCRETE: 29,106 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 16,400 SF + 29,106 SF = 45,506 SF % OF IMPERVIOUS SF TO SITE: 45,506 / 65,729 = 69.2% % OF PERVIOUS SF TO SITE: 20,223 / 65,729 = 30.8% EXISTING ZONING: C1 - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PROPOSED ZONING: C1 - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT: 25' REAR & SIDE: 20' COUNTY ROAD 116: 60' PARKING SETBACKS FRONT: 25' REAR & SIDE: 10' 1. ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON PLANS. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH 2018 EDITION OF MN/DOT STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTS), AS APPLICABLE. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF CORCORAN, ELM CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT, MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, AND HENNEPIN COUNTY PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE WORK. 4. NEW CONSTRUCTION FEATURES SHALL MATCH IN TO EXISTING WHERE APPLICABLE (PAVEMENTS, CURBS, SIDEWALKS). PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITIONS AT MATCH-IN POINTS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROLS. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM ALL THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POST ALL BONDS, PAY ALL FEES, PROVIDE PROOF OF INSURANCE, AND PROVIDE ANY NECESSARY TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR THE WORK. 8. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE SAW CUT IN FULL SECTIONS. 9. ALL NEW NON-METALLIC SANITARY AND WATER SERVICE PIPE SHALL HAVE TRACER WIRE. 10. PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11. SUBSTITUTIONS FROM INFO. SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 12. VERIFY BUILDING DIMENSIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND FOUNDATION PLAN. 13. OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO HOLD PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTES: SITE DATA LEGEND INSTALL NEW B612 CURB AND GUTTER. INSTALL NEW CONCRETE RIBBON CURB. INSTALL NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. COORDINATE UTILITY CONNECTIONS WITH PLUMBING PLANS. 9' x 18.5' PARKING STALL (TYP.) COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANY FOR RELOCATION OF UTILITY LINE AND OR BOX. PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN. RIPRAP STABILIZED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW. INSTALL NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK. INSTALL CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER. NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE. SEE ARCH PLANS. INSTALL NEW RAIN GUARDIAN. PROVIDE THREE FOOT TRANSITION FROM FLUSH TO FULL BACK AT TERMINATION OF CURB. ADA PARKING AND ACCESS ASILE. PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN. SEE ARCH. PLANS. NEW RETAINING WALL. INSTALL 75 LF 15" CL IV RCP @ 0.53% INSTALL 5 LF 6" SDR 26 PVC @ 2.00% (MIN) INSTALL 104 LF 6" SDR 26 PVC DRAINTILE @ 0.00% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 KEYNOTES 13 14 15 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 16 16 16 8 99 9 10 11 12 13 13 14 14 14 15 17 17 I.972.5 I.972.4 CONNECT TO EX 6" SANITARY SERVICE STUB. VERIFY STUB LOCATION AND ELEVATION PRIOR TO SANITARY SERVICE INSTALLATION. 18 18 I.972.5 I.972.5 19 INSTALL 4" 22.5° AND 11.25° BENDS INSTALL 4" 45° BEND INSTALL NEW SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT INSTALL NEW DRAINTILE CLEANOUT INSTALL 30 LF 6" SDR 26 SOLID WALL PVC @ 0.00% NEW OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE PER 1/C-7 INSTALL MNDOT TYPE 31 BARRIER ASSEMBLY AT BUILDING WALL ALONG LOADING AREA INSTALL THREE CONCRETE BOLLARDS. INSTALL 22 LF 6" SDR 26 PVC @ 2.27% INSTALL 15.5 LF 6" SDR 26 PVC @ 2.00% (MIN) INSTALL TWO 6" 45° BENDS INSTALL DRAINTILE END SECTION AND RODENT SHIELD. INSTALL 37 LF 6" SDR 26 SOLID WALL PVC @ 0.00% INSTALL 56 LF 12" CLIV RCP @ 0.89% INSTALL BIOFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG BOTTOM OF SWALE. 20 21 22 23 24 25 KEYNOTES 19 20 22 23 23 24 25 26 26 DRIVE THRU LANE27 I.971.9 I.971.8 18 28 29 28 29 30 30 INSTALL 7 LF 6" C900 FIRE SERVICE WITH 6" GATE VALVE. COORDINATE SERVICE LOCATION AND ELEVATION WITH PLUMBING PLANS. REPLACE EXISTING GRAVEL SHOULDER DISTURBED WITH PROPOSED GRADING IN KIND I.974.6 I.974.0 (N) I.972.5 (NW) I.972.5 (S) INSTALL 70 LF 6" SDR 26 PVC DRAINTILE @ 0.85% INSTALL 70 LF 6" SDR 26 PVC DRAINTILE @ 0.85% I.974.3 12 113 1 1. FOR ANY SITE ACTIVITY (DEMO, GRADING, UTILITIES, ETC.) NO CLOSURES OR RESTRICTIONS OF ANY KIND SHALL BE IMPOSED UPON THE PUBLIC USE OF 75TH AVE WITHOUT THE CITY'S PERMISSION. SHOULD ANY LANE RESTRICTIONS BE NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE, AND PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. 2. THE CITY OF CORCORAN WILL MAKE WEEKLY SITE VISITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A MS4 CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF CORCORAN NO LESS THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION TO SCHEDULE WEEKLY VISITS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY OF CORCORAN A DETAILED WORK SCHEDULE NO LESS THAN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE DETAILED SCHEDULE SHALL INCLUDE GRADING AND UTILITY ACTIVITIES; IN ADDITIONAL TO OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE CITY SHALL BE GIVEN FORTY EIGHT (48) HOURS NOTICE IN ADVANCE OF THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE START OF THE GRADING AND UTILITY PHASES, AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENCING SHOULD ANY STOP IN WORK EXCEEDING SEVEN (7) DAYS OCCUR. CITY OF CORCORAN NOTES 10 10 INSTALL 11 LF 2" TYPE K COPPER DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE WITH CURB STOP. COORDINATE SERVICE LOCATION AND ELEVATION WITH PLUMBING PLANS. INSTALL 6X6X2 TEE. CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" WATER SERVICE. 31 31 23 23 23 32 32 33 33 34 34 34 34 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT NEW FILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM = 974.50 HWL = 977.07 27 3PR O O F O F P A R K I N G 13 PHASE 2 TENANT SPACE FFE = 980.5± PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION NAPA AUTO IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN IN HENNEPIN BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY WESTSIDE TIRE AND ON THE NORTH BY HEIDI'S GROWHAUS & LIFESTYLE GARDENS. THE PROPERTY EXTENDS TO THE SOUTH BY 75TH AVE NORTH AND THE EAST BY FLETCHER LANE, LOCATED IN ELM CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT THE PROPOSED SITE ENCOMPASSES 1.51 ACRES. THE PLANNED SCOPE OF THE PROJECT INCLUDES: ·THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS REQUIRED FOR THE MASS GRADING OF THE SITE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CORCORAN NAPA AUTO. ·GRADING AS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE NAPA AUTO BUILDING, AND ASSOCIATED PARKING LOTS. ·THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STORMWATER FILTRATION POND AND DRAINTILE SYSTEM. ·REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF TWO COUNTY DITCH CULVERTS. ·PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE AS REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALKS THROUGHOUT THE SITE. RECEIVING WATERS THESE WATERS ARE LOCATED WITHIN ON MILE (AERIAL RADIUS) OF THE PROJECT LIMITS AND RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE. DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE RECEIVING WATERS, THE BMPS DESCRIBED IN APPENDIX A OF THE NPDES PERMIT MAY APPLY TO ALL AREAS OF THE SITE. SOIL TYPES SOIL TYPES TYPICALLY FOUND ON THIS PROJECT IS CLAY LOAM, HYDRAULIC SOIL TYPE D. PER SOIL BORINGS TAKEN BY AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING THE FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS TO BE KEPT ON SITE AS PART OF THE SWPPP AND IS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. LONG TERM MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION NAPA AUTO HAS ENTERED INTO A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CORCORAN THAT IDENTIFIES THE AGENCY THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE, AND HOW RESPONSIBILITY WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO OTHER AGENTS. PROJECT PERSONNEL AND TRAINING THIS SWPPP WAS PREPARED BY PERSONNEL THAT ARE VERIFIED IN THE DESIGN OF CONSTRUCTION SWPPP. COPIES OF THE CERTIFICATIONS ARE ON FILE WITH THE ENGINEER. PROVIDE A CERTIFIED EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR IN GOOD STANDING WHO IS KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. THE EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR WILL WORK WITH THE PROJECT ENGINEER / SWPPP DESIGNER TO OVERSEE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE MPCA. PROVIDE PROOF OF CERTIFICATION AT THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. WORK WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMMENCE UNTIL PROOF OF CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER. PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE CERTIFIED INSTALLER FOR EACH CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR THAT INSTALLS THE PRODUCTS LISTED IN SPECIFICATION SECTION 2573.3.A.2 CERTIFIED INSTALLERS. PROVIDE PROOF OF CERTIFICATION AT THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. WORK WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMMENCE UNTIL PROOF OF CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER. CHAIN OF RESPONSIBILITY THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE CO-PERMITTEES FOR THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AT ALL TIMES UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE MPCA THE CONTRACTOR WILL DEVELOP A CHAIN OF COMMAND WITH ALL OPERATORS ON THE SITE TO ENSURE THAT THE SWPPP WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AND STAY IN EFFECT UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IS COMPLETE, THE ENTIRE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION, AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. PROJECT CONTACTS THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED. MPCA DUTY OFFICER 24 HOUR EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION: 651-649-5451 OR 800-422-0798 SITE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NAME, CONTACT INFO, AND TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION AND INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE OF BMPS. INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES WITHIN A 24 HOUR TIME FRAME. INSPECT ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT, EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS UNTIL THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE N.O.T. HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. INSPECT SURFACE WATER INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES FOR SIGNS OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS FOR EVIDENCE OF TRACKING ONTO PAVED SURFACES. INSPECT SURROUNDING PROPERTIES FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF SITE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION. RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES IN WRITING WITHIN 24 HOURS. SUBMIT INSPECTION REPORTS IN A FORMAT THAT IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER. FOR PROJECTS THAT DISCHARGE TO PROHIBITED WATERS, CONDUCT ROUTINE SITE INSPECTIONS AT A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY 72 HOURS (3 DAYS). INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING IN THE RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY: A. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS B. NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS C. FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS D. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN, INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES E. DATE AND AMOUNT OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCH IN 24 HOURS F. DOCUMENTS AND CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP REPLACE, REPAIR OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS BY IN THE TIME PROVIDED BELOW: A. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR SUPPLEMENT PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN IT BECOMES NONFUNCTIONAL OR SEDIMENT REACHES 12 THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. COMPLETE REPAIRS BY B. THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY FOLLOWING DISCOVERY. C. REPAIR OR REPLACE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR SEDIMENT REACHES 12 THE HEIGHT AND/OR DEPTH OF THE DEVICE. COMPLETE REPAIRS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY FOLLOWING DISCOVER. D. DRAIN AND REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASINS ONCE THE SEDIMENT HAS REACHED 12 THE STORAGE VOLUME. COMPLETE WORK WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. E. REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATER INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. RESTABILIZED ANY AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED BY SEDIMENT REMOVAL OPERATION. SEDIMENT REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY. PREPARE AND SUBMIT A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WORKING IN SURFACE WATERS. F. REMOVE TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM PAVED SURFACES BOTH ON AND OFF SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. STREET SWEEPING MAY HAVE TO OCCUR MORE OFTEN TO MINIMIZE OFF SITE IMPACTS. LIGHTLY WET THE PAVEMENT PRIOR TO SWEEPING G. MAINTAIN ALL BMPS UNTIL WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED, SITE HAS GONE UNDER FINAL STABILIZATION, AND THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. AREA SUMMARY SPECIAL SITE NOTES IF SITE REQUIRES PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT HYDROLOGIC AND WATER QUALITY MODELING DATA IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. THE SWPPP COORDINATOR MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY THE MPCA AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING: ·SUBMIT THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS ·IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP. ·OVERSEE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE PRACTICES AND REPAIRS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP. ·IMPLEMENT AND OVERSEE EMPLOYEE TRAINING AND RECORD IN OR WITH THE SWPPP. ·CONDUCT OR PROVIDE FOR INSPECTION AND MONITORING ACTIVITIES AND MAINTAIN LOGS AS PERMIT REQUIRES. ·IDENTIFY OTHER POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES NOT LISTED IN THE SWPPP AND ADD THEM. ·IDENTIFY ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE SWPPP AND CORRECT THEM. ·ENSURE THAT CHANGES TO CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE ADDRESSED IN THE SWPPP. ·FILE THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION UPON PROJECT COMPLETION. AFTER THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN FILED, THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSIGNING RESPONSIBILITY FOR PERMANENT MAINTENANCE MEASURES. PERMITS THE FOLLOWING PERMITS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT: NOTE: IF THE 25' BUFFERS ARE MAINTAINED FORM THE WETLANDS, ADDITIONAL PERMITS WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS THE REQUIRED SWPPP ELEMENTS MAY BE LOCATED IN MANY PLACES WITHIN THE PLAN SET. SWPPP AMENDMENTS A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS. PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OF ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER, OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER. PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL. STABILIZATION TIME FRAMES ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WILL RECEIVE SEED OR SOD ACCORDING TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED VEGETATIVE TIME SCHEDULE. FINAL STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR WHEN THE SITE HAS A UNIFORM VEGETATIVE COVER WITH A DENSITY OF 70% OVER THE ENTIRE DISTURBED AREA COMPARED TO EXISTING CONDITIONS. ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE SITE FINAL STABILIZATION. ALL SEDIMENT MUST BE CLEANED OUT OF CONVEYANCES AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS IF APPLICABLE. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE - PAGE 1 OF 2 PROJECT SITE 1-MILE RADIUS AROUND PROJECT COUNTY DITCH 16 WATERS WITHIN 1 MILE RADIUS NAME OF WATER BODY TYPE (LAKE, RIVER, WETLAND, DITCH, ETC) APPENDIX A SPECIAL WATER (YES OR NO) IMPAIRED WATER WITHIN 1 MILE OF PROJECT SITE (YES OR NO) APPROVED TMDL RECEIVING WATERS (YES OR NO) COUNTY DITCH 16 DITCH NO NO NA NO CONTACT INFORMATION ORGANIZATION CONTACT NAME PHONE NAPA AUTO ANDERSON ENGINEERING (SWPPP DESIGN)763-412-4000 KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION CHUCK EDWARDS 763-428-8088 ACREAGE SUMMARY AREA ACRES PROPERTY 1.509 DISTURBED 1.509 IMP. PRE-CONSTRUCTION 0.593 IMP. POST-CONSTRUCTION 1.018 NEW IMP.0.425 PERVIOUS AT COMPLETION 0.491 AGENCY TYPE OF PERMIT PERMIT # AND DATES MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) NPDES CONSTRUCTION PERMIT CITY OF CORCORAN GRADING PERMIT CITY OF CORCORAN BUILDING PERMIT AREA TIME FRAME NOTES LAST 200 LINEAL FEET OF DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION TO SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE 1, 2, 3 REMAINING PORTIONS OF DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE 7 DAYS 1, 3 PIPE AND CULVERT OUTLETS 24 HOURS STOCKPILES 7 DAYS 1 PLOTTED:COMM. NO. DRAWING NO. 10/12/2020 15897 NAPA AUTO 1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . # 1 0 0 Plymouth, MN 55441 | ae-mn .com P 763.412.4000 | F 763.412.4090 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC DRAWING TITLE CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED: IJWMAMIJW 12/15/2020 REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO. DATE 19905 75TH AVENUE CORCORAN, MN KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION PLANNING COMMISSION PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:LICENSE NO.12/15/2020 CITY COMMENTS12/10/21 CITY COMMENTS23/5/21 BUILDING SIZE REDUCTION35/6/21 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C-4 1. INITIATE INLET STABILIZATION IMMEDIATELY WHEN CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE. COMPLETE STABILIZATION WITHIN THE TIME FRAME LISTED. IN MANY INSTANCES THIS WILL REQUIRE STABILIZATION TO OCCUR MORE THAN ONCE DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT CLAY OR SILT AND STOCKPILED AND CONSTRUCTED ROAD BASE ARE NOT APPROPRIATE AND THEREFORE EXEMPT FROM THE STABILIZATION REQUIREMENT. 2. APPLICATION OF MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER AND POLYACRYLAMIDE ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE STABILIZATION METHODS IN THESE AREAS. 3. STABILIZE ALL AREAS OF THE SITE PRIOR TO THE ONSET OF WINTER, ANY WORK STILL BEING PERFORMED WILL BE SNOW MULCHED, SEEDED, AND BLANKETED WITHIN THE TIME FRAMES IN THE NPDES PERMIT. 4. TOPSOIL BERMS MUST BE STABILIZED IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED PERIMETER CONTROL BMPS. USE RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 2, 3, OR 4 AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SEED MIX USED IN THE RAPID STABILIZATION MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AS FOLLOWS: A.SINGLE YEAR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN MAY 1 - AUGUST 1, SEED WITH SEED MIXTURE 21.111 B.SINGLE YEAR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN AUGUST 1 AND OCTOBER 31, SEED WITH SEED MIXTURE 21-112 C.MULTI YEAR CONSTRUCTION 22-111 5. KEEP DITCHES AND EXPOSED SOILS IN AN EVEN ROUGH GRADED CONDITION IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO APPLY EROSION CONTROL MULCHES, HYDROMULCHES AND BLANKETS. GENERAL SWPPP NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL AMEND THE SWPPP AND DOCUMENT ANY AND ALL CHANGES TO THE SWPPP AND ASSOCIATED PLAN SHEETS WITHIN 7 DAYS UPON IMPLEMENTATION. STORE THE SWPPP AND ALL AMENDMENTS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 2. PREPARE AND SUBMIT A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE ENGINEER'S ACCEPTANCE FOR CONCRETE MANAGEMENT, CONCRETE SLURRY APPLICATION AREAS, WORK IN AND NEAR AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY, AREAS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS AS "SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN AREA", ANY WORK THAT WILL REQUIRE DEWATERING, AND AS REQUESTED BY THE ENGINEER. SUBMIT ALL SITE MANAGEMENT PLANS TO THE ENGINEER IN WRITING. ALLOW ALL MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS FOR THE ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND ACCEPT SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMITTALS. WORK WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMMENCE IF A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE HAS BEEN GRANTED BY THE ENGINEER. THERE WILL BE NO EXTRA TIME ADDED TO THE CONTRACT DUE TO THE UNTIMELY SUBMITTAL. 3. IT IS THE DESIGNER'S INTENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR BUILD PONDS AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BMPS BEFORE PUTTING THEM INTO ACTIVE SERVICE TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE. 4. BURNING OF ANY MATERIAL IS NOT ALLOWED WITHIN PROJECT BOUNDARY. 5. DO NOT DISTURB AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED PRIOR TO STARTING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. IF IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. PRESERVE ALL NATURAL BUFFERS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 6. ROUT STORMWATER AROUND UNSTABILIZED AREAS OF THE SITE WHENEVER FEASIBLE. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL AND VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICES AS NEEDED TO KEEP CHANNELS FROM ERODING AND TO PREVENT NUISANCE CONDITIONS AT THE OUTLET. 7. DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREA WHENEVER FEASIBLE. PROVIDE VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICES AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION. 8. THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE PLACED AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE EROSION FROM DISTURBED SURFACES AND TO CAPTURE SEDIMENT ON SITE. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY REMOVAL WORK AND/OR GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES COMMENCE. 9. ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS AND UP GRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES BEFORE AND UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. MAINTAIN SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED. 10. LOCATE PERIMETER CONTROL ON THE CONTOUR TO CAPTURE OVERLAND, LOW-VELOCITY SHEET FLOWS DOWN GRADIENT OF ALL EXPOSED SOILS AND PRIOR TO DISCHARGING TO SURFACE WATERS. PLACE J-HOOKS AT A MAXIMUM OF 100 FOOT INTERVALS. 11. PROVIDE PERIMETER CONTROL AROUND ALL STOCKPILES. PLACE BMP A MINIMUM 5 FEET FROM THE TOE OF SLOPE WHERE FEASIBLE. DO NOT PLACE STOCKPILES IN NATURAL BUFFER AREAS, SURFACE WATERS OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCES. 12. FLOATING SILT CURTAIN IS ALLOWED AS PERIMETER CONTROL FOR IN WATER WORK ONLY. INSTALL THE FLOATING SILT CURTAIN AS CLOSE TO SHORE AS POSSIBLE. PLACE PERIMETER CONTROL BMP ON LAND IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE IN WATER WORK IS COMPLETED. 13. DITCH CHECKS WILL BE PLACED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. 14. PLACE CONSTRUCTION EXITS, AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PAVED SURFACES BOTH ON AND OFF THE PROJECT SITE. PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION EXITS OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PREVENT TRACK OUT. MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION EXITS WHEN EVIDENCE OF TRACKING IS DISCOVERED. REGULAR STREET SWEEPING IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO PROPER CONSTRUCTION EXIT INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE. CONSTRICTION EXITS ARE INCIDENTAL. 15. DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN WATER TO TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS WHENEVER FEASIBLE. IN THE EVENT THAT IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO DISCHARGE THE SEDIMENT LADEN WATER TO A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, THE WATER MUST BE TREATED SO THAT IT DOES NOT CAUSE A NUISANCE CONDITION IN THE RECEIVING WATERS OR TO DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS. CLEAN OUT ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER BASINS REGARDLESS OF WHETHER USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS OR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS TO THE DESIGN CAPACITY AFTER ALL UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. 16. PROVIDE SCOUR PROTECTION AT ANY OUTFALL OF DEWATERING ACTIVITIES. 17. PROVIDE STABILIZATION IN ANY TRENCHES CUT FOR DEWATERING OR SITE DRAINING PURPOSES. POLLUTION PREVENTION 1. PROVIDE A SPILL KIT AT EACH WORK LOCATION ON THE SITE. 2. STORE ALL BUILDING MATERIALS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS, PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES. FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICALS, AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. 3. PROVIDE A SECURE STORAGE AREA WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS FOR ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE. RETURN ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE TO THE DESIGNATED STORAGE AREA AT THE END OF THE BUSINESS DAY UNLESS INFEASIBLE. STORE ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT, PETROLEUM BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY. 4. STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE OF ALL SOLID WASTE. 5. POSITION ALL PORTABLE TOILETS SO THAT THEY ARE SECURE AND CANNOT BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SANITARY WASTE. 6. FUEL AND MAINTAIN VEHICLES IN A DESIGNATED CONTAINED AREA WHENEVER FEASIBLE. USE DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENT MATERIALS TO PREVENT SPILLS OR LEAKED CHEMICALS FORM DISCHARGING TO SURFACE WATER OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCES. PROVIDE A SPILL KIT AT EACH LOCATION THAT VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT ARE FUELED OR MAINTAINED AT. 7. LIMIT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA TO A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER EFFECTIVE CONTROL. PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL WASTE GENERATED BY VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING. ENGINE DEGREASING IS NOT ALLOWED ON THE SITE. 8. PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OF CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND. DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO THAT IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR CONTAINMENT AREA. 9. CREATE AND FOLLOW A WRITTEN DISPOSAL PLAN FOR ALL WASTE MATERIALS. INCLUDE IN THE PLAN HOW THE MATERIAL WILL BE DISPOSED OF AND THE LOCATION OF THE DISPOSAL SITE. SUBMIT PLAN TO THE ENGINEER. 10. USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT DISCHARGE OR PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS GRINDINGS, CUTTING, MILLINGS, AND OTHER BITUMINOUS WASTES FROM AREAS OF EXISTING OR FUTURE VEGETATED SOILS AND FROM ALL WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING INLETS, DITCHES AND CURB FLOW LINES. 11. USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT CONCRETE DUST, PARTICLES, CONCRETE WASH OUT, AND OTHER CONCRETE WASTES FROM LEAVING SITE, DEPOSITING IN EXISTING OR FUTURE VEGETATED AREAS, AND FROM ENTERING STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING INLETS, DITCHES AND CURB FLOW LINES. USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT SAW CUT SLURRY AND PLANING WASTE FROM LEAVING SITE AND FROM ENTERING STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS INCLUDING DITCHES AND CULVERTS. RECORD RETENTION THE SWPPP, ALL CHANGES TO IT AND INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT ON-SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER MUST RETAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING RECORDS FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT). 1. ANY OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. 2. RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION 3. ALL PERMANENT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND 4. ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. SWPPP SCHEDULE OF INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE - PAGE 2 OF 2 ITEM INSTALLATION INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE REMOVAL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. INSPECT & MAINT. AFTER EACH RUN-OFF EVENT. REMOVE SEDIMENTS AS REQUIRED. AFTER TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA IS RESTORED. ROCK CONST. ENTRANCE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. INSPECT REGULARLY. MAINTAIN AS NEEDED.PRIOR TO PAVING. OUTLET SKIMMER STRUCTURE AFTER POND GRADING IS COMPLETED. INSPECT REGULARLY. MAINTAIN AS NEEDED.PERMANENT. RIP-RAP & FILTER UPON COMPLETION OF POND GRADING, CONC. SWALE CONST. AND OUTLET INSTALLATION. INSPECT & MAINTAIN AT LEAST ANNUALLY AND AFTER HEAVY RAINFALL EVENT. PERMANENT. DETENTION POND DURING EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. AFTER HEAVY RAINFALL EVENTS. REMOVE SEDIMENTS AS NEEDED.PERMANENT. SEED & MULCH AFTER POND GRADING IS COMPLETED. INSPECT & MAINTAIN AFTER HEAVY RAINS. REPLACE WASH-OUT AREAS IMMEDIATELY NO REMOVAL NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION UPON INLET CONSTRUCTING WHEN 1/3 CAPACITY OF BMP IS REACHED AFTER TRIBUTARY AREAS ARE FULLY RESTORED PLOTTED:COMM. NO. DRAWING NO. 10/12/2020 15897 NAPA AUTO 1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . # 1 0 0 Plymouth, MN 55441 | ae-mn .com P 763.412.4000 | F 763.412.4090 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC DRAWING TITLE CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED: IJWMAMIJW 12/15/2020 REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO. DATE 19905 75TH AVENUE CORCORAN, MN KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION PLANNING COMMISSION IAN J. WEBER, PE 55502 PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:LICENSE NO.12/15/2020 CITY COMMENTS12/10/21 CITY COMMENTS23/5/21 BUILDING SIZE REDUCTION35/6/21 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C-5 PLOTTED:COMM. NO. DRAWING NO. 10/12/2020 15897 NAPA AUTO 1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . # 1 0 0 Plymouth, MN 55441 | ae-mn .com P 763.412.4000 | F 763.412.4090 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC DRAWING TITLE CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED: IJWMAMIJW 12/15/2020 REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO. DATE 19905 75TH AVENUE CORCORAN, MN KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION PLANNING COMMISSION IAN J. WEBER, PE 55502 PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:LICENSE NO.12/15/2020 CITY COMMENTS12/10/21 CITY COMMENTS23/5/21 BUILDING SIZE REDUCTION35/6/21 CIVIL DETAILS C-6 PLOTTED:COMM. NO. DRAWING NO. 10/12/2020 15897 NAPA AUTO 1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . # 1 0 0 Plymouth, MN 55441 | ae-mn .com P 763.412.4000 | F 763.412.4090 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC DRAWING TITLE CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED: IJWMAMIJW 12/15/2020 REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO. DATE 19905 75TH AVENUE CORCORAN, MN KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION PLANNING COMMISSION IAN J. WEBER, PE 55502 PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:LICENSE NO.12/15/2020 CITY COMMENTS12/10/21 CITY COMMENTS23/5/21 BUILDING SIZE REDUCTION35/6/21 CIVIL DETAILS C-7 1.14 FT 1 C-7 OCS DETAIL SCALE: NTS 975975976976977977977978978978980979980 979 977 978 1Autumn Gold Maidenhair Tree 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B 4Green Mountain Sugar Maple 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B 3 Ponderosa Pine 6` HT. B&B 3 Black Hills Spruce 6` HT. B&B 4 Swamp White Oak 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B 2*Swamp White Oak 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B 2*Green Mountain Sugar Maple 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B 1Swamp White Oak 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B 1Green Mountain Sugar Maple 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B 1Autumn Gold Maidenhair Tree 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B 1Autumn Gold Maidenhair Tree 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B NAPA BUILDING FFE = 980.5± 2Green Mountain Sugar Maple 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B 3*Black Hills Spruce 6` HT. B&B 1*Ponderosa Pine 6` HT. B&B 4*Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 2" CAL. B&B 3*Spring Snow Crabapple 2" CAL. B&B 12 (11*)Low Scape Mound Black Chokeberry 5 GAL. POT 21*Bailey`s Compact American Cranberry Bush 5 GAL. POT 22Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass 2 GAL. POT 9Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 GAL. POT 1Green Mountain Sugar Maple 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B 6 Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 GAL. POT 10Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass 2 GAL. POT 3 Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 GAL. POT 10Annabelle Hydrangea 5 GAL. POT 13 Sea Green Juniper 5 GAL. POT 15Low Scape Mound Black Chokeberry 5 GAL. POT 1 Autumn Gold Maidenhair Tree 2 - 1/2" CAL. B&B80.00160.00 40.00 16.0025.00 CORCORAN, MN LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS BASE TREE CALCULATION - WHICHEVER IS GREATER METHOD 1: 1 TREE PER 50 LINEAR FEET OF SITE PERIMETER SITE PERIMETER:1046' TREES REQUIRED:21 METHOD 2: 1 TREE PER 1,000 SQFT OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA:16,400 SQFT TREES REQUIRED:16 BASE SHRUB CALCULATION - WHICHEVER IS GREATER METHOD 1: 1 SHRUB PER 30 LINEAR FEET OF SITE PERIMETER SHRUBS REQUIRED:35 METHOD 2: 1 SHRUB PER 300 SQFT OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA SHRUBS REQUIRED:55 TOTAL PLANTINGS PROVIDED - BASE CALCULATION TREES PROVIDED:21 SHRUBS PROVIDED:55 GENERAL TURF SEED AREA EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED WET SEED AREA PLOTTED:COMM. NO. DRAWING NO. 12/12/2020 15897 NAPA AUTO 1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . # 1 0 0 Plymouth, MN 55441 | a e-mn .com P 763.412.4000 | F 763.412.4090 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC DRAWING TITLE CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED: IJWMAMIJW 12/15/2020 REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO. DATE 19905 75TH AVENUE CORCORAN, MN KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION PLANNING COMMISSION DEREK J. SEIFERT, PLA 56013 PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:LICENSE NO.03/05/2021 CITY COMMENTS12/10/21 CITY COMMENTS23/5/21 BUILDING SIZE REDUCTION35/6/21 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1 0 20' 40'NLEGEND PROPERTY LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 966 965 MONUMENT SIGN PLANTING PLAN LEGEND 1 2 3" DEEP WASHED RIVER ROCK W/ LANDSCAPE FABRIC POLY LANDSCAPE EDGER 1 2 PLANTING PLAN NOTES 1) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY IRRIGATION FOR SEED, TREE, & SHRUB PLANTING ESTABLISHMENT DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD. NO PERMANENT IRRIGATION REQUIRED. 2) SEE L-2 FOR FULL PLANT SCHEDULE, NOTES, AND PLANTING DETAILS. 3) ADDITIONAL PLANTING MATERIAL QUANTITY ALONG COUNTY ROAD 116 (EAST BOUNDARY PREIMETER), DENOTED BY AN ASTERISK (*), IS CALCULATED AS PER CITY SITE PLAN REVIEW DATED FEBRUARY 3, 2021. 4) QUANTITY ADDED, AS PER 313 LF OF FRONTAGE: - 4 DECIDUOUS TREES - 4 CONIFEROUS TREES - 7 ORNAMENTAL TREES - 32 UNDERSTORY SHRUBS 12 1 1 2 1 1 FILTRATION BASIN SEE CIVIL 2 PHASE 2 TENANT SPACE FFE = 980.5± CONIFEROUS TREES QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT.SIZE 6 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE B&B 6` HT.PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA` 4 PONDEROSA PINE B&B 6` HT.PINUS PONDEROSA DECIDUOUS TREES QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT.SIZE 8 GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLE B&B 2 - 1/2" CAL. ACER SACCHARUM `GREEN MOUNTAIN` TM 4 AUTUMN GOLD MAIDENHAIR TREE B&B 2 - 1/2" CAL. GINKGO BILOBA `AUTUMN GOLD` TM 7 SWAMP WHITE OAK B&B 2 - 1/2" CAL. QUERCUS BICOLOR ORNAMENTAL TREES QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT.SIZE 4 AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY B&B 2" CAL.AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` 3 SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE B&B 2" CAL.MALUS X `SPRING SNOW` SHRUBS QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE 27 LOW SCAPE MOUND BLACK CHOKEBERRY POT 5 GAL. ARONIA MELANOCARPA `UCONNAM165` TM 10 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA POT 5 GAL. HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE` 13 SEA GREEN JUNIPER POT 5 GAL.JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN` 18 GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC POT 5 GAL.RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` 21 BAILEY`S COMPACT AMERICAN CRANBERRY BUSH POT 5 GAL.VIBURNUM TRILOBUM `BAILEY COMPACT` PERENNIALS QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE 32 KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS POT 2 GAL. CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` PLANT SCHEDULE 1 L-2 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL (TYP.) NTS 2 L-2 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL (TYP.) NTS 3 L-2 LANDSCAPE EDGING DETAIL (TYP.) NTS 1. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY WATERINGS TO KEEP ALL PLANTED AREAS GROWING IN A HEALTHY CONDITION FOR THE EXTENTS OF ONE (1) YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION AND APPROVAL BY OWNER. ANY SEEDED AREAS THAT DIE OR SHOW FATIGUE DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CARE WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION SHALL BE OVERSEEDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COSTS TO THE OWNER. OVERSEEDING, IF APPLICABLE, SHALL BE THE SAME MIX AND RATE AS ORIGINALLY INSTALLED. ANY TREES OR SHRUBS THAT DIE OR SHOW FATIGUE DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CARE WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION SHALL BE REPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COSTS TO THE OWNER. REPLACEMENT PLANTS SHALL BE IN KIND TO THE ORIGINAL. 2. A WATERING SCHEDULE FOR THE LENGTH OF THE ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE INSTALLATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH BID. 3. THE WATER SOURCE FOR WATERING OF ALL PLANTING AND SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. SUBMIT A DEDUCT ITEM IN BID FOR OWNER PROVIDED WATER SOURCE. GENERAL TEMPORARY IRRIGATION NOTES: 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE PROJECT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID TO BECOME COMPLETELY FAMILIAR WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 2. ALL ROUGH AND FINISH GRADING TO BE DONE BY OTHERS. 3. NO PLANTING SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING, BUILDING, CONSTRUCTION, UTILITY WORK & IRRIGATION (IF APPLICABLE) HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE AREAS TO BE PLANTED. 4. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO IDENTIFY ALL UNDERGROUND CABLES, CONDUITS, WIRES, ETC., ON THE PROPERTY. 5. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN IN THE PLANT LIST, THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WILL TAKE PRECEDENCE. 6. ALL PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED CAREFULLY AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. IF THE CONTRACTOR BELIEVES AN ERROR HAS BEEN MADE REGARDING SPACING OR LOCATION OF THE PLANT MATERIAL INDICATED ON THE PLAN, NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE MAINTENANCE OF THE PLANT MATERIAL (WATERING, SPRAYING, FERTILIZING, MOWING, ETC.) UNTIL THE WORK HAS BEEN ACCEPTED, BY THE OWNER. 8. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REPAIRS TO PROPERTY DAMAGE FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 9. ALL NEWLY PLANTED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR STARTING FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE ESTABLISHED BY THE OWNER. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH THE OWNER OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE ON SITE WHEN THEY FEEL THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE ACCORDING TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. IF ALL WORK IS SATISFACTORY AND COMPLETE ACCORDING TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THEN THE OWNER MUST DECLARE THE PROJECT COMPLETE. THIS DECLARATION WILL CONSTITUTE AS THE BEGINNING OF THE ONE (1) YEAR WARRANTEE PERIOD FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL. THE OWNER SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER WITH SIGNATURE STATING THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. 11. WIND BURN OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED PLANT MATERIAL WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 12. THE PRACTICE OF STAKING SHOULD NOT ALLOW NAILS, SCREWS, WIRES, ETC. TO PENETRATE THE OUTER SURFACE OF THE TREES. 13. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL TREE STAKES, GUYS, STRAPS AND TRUNK PROTECTION MEASURES FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE WARRANTEE PERIOD OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. 14. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH MAINTENANCE INFORMATION DURING THE GUARANTEE PERIOD RELATING TO WATERING, FERTILIZING, PRUNING, PEST CONTROL, AND RELATED ITEMS. THIS WILL BE PREPARED AND DELIVERED TO THE OWNER AFTER PROVISIONAL INSPECTION APPROVAL HAS BEEN GIVEN BY THE OWNER AND/OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 15. INSTALL CORRUGATED PLASTIC TREE GUARDS, WHITE IN COLOR, WITH THE SIZE OF TUBE 1" DIA. (MIN.) LARGER THAN THE CALIPER OF THE TREE TO BE PROTECTED. 16. CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH & STALL PLASTIC EDGING AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS & DETAILS. PLASTIC EDGING SHALL BE MEDIUM DENSITY POLYETHYLENE WITH U.V. INHIBITOR, BLACK IN COLOR, WITH A TOTAL DEPTH OF 5” (1” DIA. TOP AND 4” SHAFT WITH 1.5” V EVERY 3-1/2 FEET OF EDGING. 17. LANDSCAPE FABRIC (FILTER MAT) TO HAVE A COMBINED WEIGHT OF 4.5-5.5 OZ. PER S.Y. FABRIC SHOULD BE U.V. STABILIZED AND HAVE A FIVE YEAR MINIMUM WEATHERABILITY FACTOR IN FULL SUNLIGHT. FABRIC TO BE PHILLIPS DUON R OR EQUIVALENT. SAMPLE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL. 18. 3" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER ALL TREES AND SHRUBS THAT ARE ISOLATED FROM GROUNDCOVER AREAS AND GENERAL SHRUB MASSES. 19. 3” DEPTH 1”TO 1-1/2” WASHED RIVER ROCK SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER LANDSCAPED FABRIC AS INDICATED ON THE PANS & DETAILS. 20. FOR BALLED & BURLAP PLANT MATERIAL, REMOVE THE TOP HALF OF THE BURLAP FROM THE ROOT BALL. WIRE CAGES, STRAPS, ETC. SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE TOP HALF OF THE ROOTBALL BEFORE INSTALLATION. 21. ALL CONTAINER MATERIAL SHALL HAVE BEEN GROWN IN CONTAINER FOR A MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 22. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE SINGLE STRAIGHT LEADERS. NO 'V' CROTCHES. 23. SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF ONE HALF THEIR ON-CENTER SPACING FROM PAVING EDGE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 24. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) CANES AT SPECIFIED HEIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN PLANT SCHEDULE. 25. ALL PERENNIAL BEDS TO RECEIVE ROCK MULCH SHALL HAVE LANDSCAPE FABRIC INSTALLED WITH HOLES FOR PLANTS CUT 2.5 TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE CONTAINER. 26. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL NURSERY GROWN PLANT MATERIAL CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF ANSI Z60.1 STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS. GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT NEW TREES MOVED ONTO THE SITE ARE DUG FROM SIMILAR SITES WITH SIMILAR SOILS TO THE SOILS OF THIS PROJECT (HEAVY TO HEAVY, LIGHT TO LIGHT. HEAVY TO LIGHT SOILS). CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW SOIL CONDITIONS/TYPES WITH OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. ALL NEWLY INSTALLED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLANTED IN WELL-DRAINED AREAS. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION IF ANY PLANT MATERIAL IS LOCATED IN DRAINAGE SWALES OR WET & POORLY DRAINED AREAS. 3. ALL PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE FERTILIZER AS FOLLOWS: 3.1. SUMMER AND FALL PLANTING: 0-20-20 GRANULAR (IN SAUCER AROUND PLANT AT THE RATE OF 12 OZ. PER 2-3" CAL. TREE & 6 OZ. PER SHRUB). 3.2. SPRING PLANTING: 10-10-10 GRANULAR (APPLY ABOVE REFERENCED FERTILIZER AT A RATE OF 12 OZ. PER 1-1/2” CAL. TREE OR LARGER & 6 OZ. PER SHRUB & PERENNIAL. 4. ALL PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE AN AMENDED SOIL MIX CONSISTING OF THREE (3) PARTS: 4.1. 45% APPROVED TOPSOIL (ONE SITE PREFERRED) 4.2. 45% ORGANIC MATTER (TYPE 1 SPHAGNUM PEAT MOSS FINELY DIVIDED WITH A PH OF 3.1 - 5.0.) 4.3. 10% SAND (FINE CLEAN MASONRY SAND) 5. AREAS CONFINED TO A MASS PLANTING AREA (PLANTING BED) SHALL RECEIVE THE AMENDED SOIL MIX AT MIN. 12" DEPTH THROUGHOUT THE PLANTING AREA. AMENDED SOIL MIX SHALL BE MIXED THOROUGHLY AND INSTALLED IN 6” LIFTS. 6. AREAS TO RECEIVE SOD OR SEED SHALL HAVE A 6” MINIMUM DEPTH OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL PROVIDE FERTILE, FRIABLE, NATURAL LOAM, SURFACE SOIL, REASONABLY FREE OF SUBSOIL, CLAY CLUMPS, BRUSH WEEDS AND OTHER LITTER, AND FREE OF ROOTS, STUMPS, STONE LARGER THAN 1” IN ANY DIMENSION, AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS OR TOXIC MATTER HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. 7. ALL AREAS SPECIFIED AS 'GENERAL TURF SEED' TO BE SEEDED WITH PREMIUM SUNNY SEED MIX INCLUDING: 7.1. 20% RAVEN STAR KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 10% MIDNIGHT STAR KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 15% WASHINGTON KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 5% THERMAL BLUE BLUEGRASS 35% SPLENDID PERENNIAL RYEGRASS 15% ZODIAC CHEWINGS FESCUE(SEED MIX AVAILABLE AT GERTENS 1-651-450-1501). SEED SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 150 LBS./AC. WITH 2 TONS SHREDDED AND PUNCHED IN PLACE STRAW PER ACRE. HYDROSEEDING & MULCHING IS AND ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE. 8. ALL AREAS SPECIFIED AS 'WET AREA SEED' TO BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT MIX 33-261. BROAD CAST, DRILL AND/OR HYDROSEED AT A RATE OF 35 LBS./AC. WITH 2 TONS SHREDDED AND PUNCHED IN PLACE STRAW PER ACRE. SEED MIX SHALL BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND PERIODIC FLOODING. GENERAL SODDING, SEEDING & TOPSOIL NOTES: PLOTTED:COMM. NO. DRAWING NO. 12/12/2020 15897 NAPA AUTO 1 3 6 0 5 1 s t A v e n u e N . # 1 0 0 Plymouth, MN 55441 | ae-mn .com P 763.412.4000 | F 763.412.4090 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC DRAWING TITLE CHECKED BY:DRAWN:DESIGNED: IJWMAMIJW 12/15/2020 REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO. DATE 19905 75TH AVENUE CORCORAN, MN KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION PLANNING COMMISSION DEREK J. SEIFERT, PLA 56013 PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE:LICENSE NO.03/05/2021 CITY COMMENTS12/10/21 CITY COMMENTS23/5/21 BUILDING SIZE REDUCTION35/6/21 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L-2 1 2 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 8b. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: May 21, 2021 for the May 27, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Request for an Amended Grading Plan for Rush Creek Reserve (PID 23-119-23-42-0004) (City File 20-030) REVIEW DEADLINE: June 26, 2021 1.Application Request M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul LLC (“the applicant”) is requesting approval to expand the grading limits to include the entire site. The request is to allow rough grading in compliance with the approved preliminary plans but would not allow any street or utility construction until the final plans/final plat for each affected phase are approved and recorded. 2.Analysis of Request Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with the approved preliminary plans, as well as City policies. Grading Expansion A preliminary grading plan and tree preservation plan was approved with the Preliminary PUD Plan/Preliminary Plat approvals. With each final plat phase, a final grading plan is approved and grading within that approved phase is allowed to begin. The Council has approved three amended grading plans to allow Lennar to grade outside of the limits of the approved final plat areas to help the developer balance the site for different phases of Ravinia and for the new Tavera development. This is fairly common practice in large development like this and is typically requested as part of the final plat approvals. Council approval is required because it was not part of the final plat/final PUD approvals. The applicant would be allowed to rough grade in compliance with the preliminary grading plan and tree preservation plan, but would not be able to construct streets, utilities or final sites until the PUD final plan and final plat for each future phase are approved and recorded. The approval would allow limited grading subject to the conditions in the City Engineer’s memo and draft resolution. Rush Creek Reserve (20-030) 2 May 27, 2021 3. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2021-54 approving the Grading Expansion. Attachments a. Resolution 2021-54 approving the grading expansion b. Engineer’s memo dated May 20, 2021 c. Applicant’s narrative dated April 27, 2021 d. Rush Creek Reserve Phasing Plan e. Original Phase 1 Grading Plan City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-54 Page 1 of 4 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GRADING EXPANSION FOR RUSH CREEK RESERVE FOR M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL LLC (PID 23-119-23-42-0004) (CITY FILE 20- 030) WHEREAS, M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul LLC (“the applicant”) has requested approval to expand the approved phase I grading plan allow rough grading to occur on the remainder of the property that is planned for future development phases: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Final PUD Development Plan, master Development Contract and Final Plat for phase I were approved on November 23, 2020; WHEREAS, the plans submitted and approved in 2020 included a tree preservation plan and grading plan; WHEREAS, the applicant has requested the ability to rough grade the portions of the site planned for phase in advance of final plat approval for those phases in order to be more efficient in their grading operations and better manage stormwater; WHERAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the request and has no objection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul LLC for a grading expansion for Rush Creek Reserve based on the following findings and conditions: 1. All conditions of the preliminary approvals remain in place and must be met, except as modified by this resolution: 2. All conditions of the final approvals in Resolution 2020-87 and 2020-88 remain in place and must be met, except as modified by this resolution. 3. The applicant must comply with the approved tree preservation plan. 4. The applicant must provide an updated grading plan for the entire site showing tree protection fencing. 5. Rough grading shall be permitted, but no street or utility work shall be permitted until the final plat for the affected phase is recorded at Hennepin County. 6. The developer must provide an updated cost estimate for the expanded grading and tree protection fencing. The City will update the approved development contract with the updated cost estimates for the letter of credit. City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-54 Page 2 of 4 7. The applicant shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s memo dated May 20, 2021. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 27th day of May 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-54 Page 3 of 4 Attachment A That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies North of Hennepin County Road #10 which was formerly called the Minneapolis Monticello road, excepting therefrom the following described parcels: The East 471.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. The West 518.60 feet of the East 990.00 feet of the South 792.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23; thence East a distance of 1289.70 feet; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West to a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 5.80 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter said last described point being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 280.63 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 28 degrees and 53 minutes West a distance of 230.20 feet to the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence West 141.37 feet to the actual point of beginning. All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees and 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter distant 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 2 degrees 7 minutes West a distance of 111.70 feet; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 3.74 feet to the center line of County Road #10 and to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 196.26 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West a distance of 147.95 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West a distance of 180.05 feet to the center line of County Road #10; thence Southeasterly along said center line a distance of 205.00 feet more or less to actual point of beginning. Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East from the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 147.95 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing North 47 degrees 52 minutes West 78.20 feet; thence South 45 degrees 53 minutes West to the center line of the road; thence City of Corcoran May 27, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-54 Page 4 of 4 Southeasterly along said center line to an intersection with a line bearing South 45 degrees 53 minutes West from the point of beginning; thence North 45 degrees 53 minutes East to beginning; all in Section 23, Township 119, Range 23. Commencing in the center line of County Road at a point North 2 degrees 7 minutes West 111.70 feet from a point 1289.70 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23; thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East 200.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 08 minutes East 108.90 feet; thence South 28 degrees 53 minutes West 200.00 feet to center of County Road; thence Northwesterly along center line to point of beginning. AND The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter which lies South of the centerline of Hennepin County Road Number 10, And except: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 125.85 feet, to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 48 seconds West 300.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 29 minutes 12 seconds East, parallel with said East line, 575.70 feet to the intersection with the survey line as shown and delineated on Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 10, Plat 8; thence Southeasterly, along said survey line, to the intersection with said East line; thence Northerly, along said East line, 905.74 feet to the point of beginning. AND That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty-three (23), Township One Hundred Nineteen (119), Range Twenty-three (23), Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) distant 147.17 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence North 28 degrees 53 minutes East a distance of 230.30 feet; thence South 69 degrees 32 minutes East a distance of 73.90 feet to a line running parallel with the East line of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) and distant 330.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4); thence South parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) a distance of 174.80 feet; thence West 182.83 feet to the point of beginning. AND That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying West of the center line of County Highway No. 10. Memo To:Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From:Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE File:B002294-20-502 Date:May 20, 2021 Subject:Rush Creek Reserve Grading Review Reference: Rush Creek Reserve Grading This Memorandum is based on a review limited to the following documents: Construction Plans Phase 1 Grading (Revisions 4/26/21). Entire site stormwater plans and models. Overview: Applicant is proposing to grade the entire site and this approach has been utilized in Corcoran (grading beyond Phase limits) for other developments. 1. Approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission must be attained before any site grading or activity may commence. 2. Prior Engineering review comments still apply. 3. Other City requirements (financial sureties, City approvals, etc.) are required before grading begins. 4. MS4 and erosion control will be in effect per the Developer’s NPDES permit. Grading: Grading larger areas of a development has advantages for efficiency in balancing dirt quantities and for the adjacent landowners to limit mass grading to one construction season instead of multiple years on a per phase basis. Engineering recommends approval of site grading based on the following; 1. Stormwater design was reviewed for the entire site and upon WMO approval will be implemented with grading. 2. Tree clearing will require a walk through with City inspectors prior to removals. 3. No offsite grading is authorized, most notably the offsite north drainage swale and improvements. 4. No vehicle or equipment parking or deliveries in City Park parking lot or lift station. 5. Other Engineering reviews, permits, regulations and financial securities apply. Grading LOC amount shall be updated to include the entire site. End of Comments April 27, 2021 Brad Martens City Administrator 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 RE: Rush Creek Project Grading Dear Mr. Martens, We are close to having all of our permits and approvals to proceed with construct of the first phase of Rush Creek. In order to facilitate grading and the control of storm water we are seeking approval to mass grade the entire site at this time. Attached is a plan showing the first phase of grading, streets and utilities. We understand that City approval is necessary to grade the entire site. We have been working through the grading plan with City Staff and the City’s engineering consultants and believe we have complied with all the City and watershed requirements in order to grade the entire site. We appreciate the assistance of City staff and consultants to get to this point and look forward to commencing the project. Please let me know if you require an additional information from us. Sincerely, Lauren Grouws Land Development Manager PHASING PLAN WETLAND 10 WETLAND 9 WETLAND 6 WETLAND 8 WETLAND 7 WETLAND 5 WETLAND 4 WETLAND 3 WETLAND 2 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 4 WETLAND 4 WETLAND 4 WETLAND 11 E E E E E E E E E E E PROPANE TANK SS ROCK FLAG WELL E MAIL E E E CLVT CLVT E E C E E SCONTROL CLVT PROPANE TANK CLVT C TRAN SS ll>>>>> SCONTROL CLVT CLVT CLVT XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>N SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO. REVISION CHECKED Plot Date: 11/05/2020 - 10:54amDrawing name: \\US0291-PPFSS01\workgroup\1938\active\193804970\CAD\Dwg\Exhibit - Phasing Plan\193804970 Phasing Plan 10-13-2020.dwgXrefs:, 193804970XSPV-PH 1, 193804970XSNO-PH 1, 193804970XSXW, 193804970XSXT, 193804970XSRD, 193804970XSST-PH 1, 193804970XSST - PH 3, 193804970XSNO-PH 2, 193804970XSNO-PH 3, 193804970XSPV - PH 2, 193804970XSPV - PH 3, 193804970XSST - PH 2THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.CONCEPT PLANM/I HOMESCORCORAN, MN 193804970 0 100 200 N 11/5/20 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 PHASE 3 PHASE 1 PHASE 3 PHASE 2 WETLAND 10 WETLAND 9 WETLAND 6 WETLAND 8 WETLAND 7 WETLAND 5 WETLAND 3 WETLAND 4 WETLAND 11 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 2 PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX E E E CE E E M A I L C E E M A I L E E E PROPANE TANK SS ROCK FLAG WELL CLVT CLVT CLVT E E E E ECE E E EC E E EE EE E EC E E EE E E E ECHCE E E E EC E E E E E E E E EOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHP FO - C FO- C FO- C FO - C FO - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C FO - C UNDERGROUNDGAS MAIN SIGNND UNDERGROUNDGAS MAIN SIGNND >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AC MAILE E E CLVT CLVT E E CLVTCLVT EE C E E CLVT CLVT O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P OH P OH P OH P OH P OHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHP CTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BPROPANE TANK 13003938.7513002 EEE CLVT CLVT C TRAN SS FMFMFMFMFMFM FM FM FM FM F M FMFMFMlll>>>>> > CLVT CLVT CLVT CLVT CLVT CLVT E CLVT CLVTCLVT XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOHP OHP OHP OHP XXXX X OHP TR A N E>>> >>>>>> > > > > > >>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SS SS SS SS>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>SS SS SSSS>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > > >>>>>>>>>> >>FM FMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMl llllllll l l lllllll l l l l l llll llll l lllllllll>l> l >>>l >l >l >lllll>llll lllllllllllllll l ll lll >>lllllllllllllll>>>SHEETS C2.02, C3.02 SHEETS C2.03, C3.03 SHEETS C2.01, C3.01 SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO.REVISION CHECKED Plot Date: 05/05/2021 - 4:54pmDrawing name: C:\pw_stn_bh_infra01\dms68138\193804970C001-GRADING.dwgXrefs:, 193804970XSNO-PH 1, 193804970XSXW, 193804970XSXT, 193804970XSPV - PH 1, 193804970-XSST Ph 1, 193804970XSNU-Ph 1, 193804970XSNO-PH 2, 193804970XSPV - PH 2, 193804970XBRD-GRADINGTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.M/I HOMESRUSH CREEK RESERVE, CORCORAN, MN193804970733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.comCONSTRUCTION PLANS - PHASE 1 GRADING2/3/21CITY SUBMITTAL TNA DAA, JLT, PJW DAA, JLT, PJW ESL ESLPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.DAVID AHRENS2/3/202121711LOCATION PLAN AND SHEET INDEXC0.01 N PHASE 1 PROJECT LIMITS PHASE 1 PROJECT LIMITS PHASE 1 PROJECT LIMITS WETLAND BOUNDARY (TYP) WETLAND BUFFER (TYP) WETLAND SETBACK (TYP) C S A H 1 0 7 9 T H A V E 7 8 T H P L WALNUT LNX Y L O I D L N 79TH PL 80TH AVECSAH 11679TH AV EXYLOID LNWALNUT LN BRIAN D PURRMAN/KIM I SANDEY 7923 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 TIMOTHY & LISA SMITH 7935 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 HENRY R HALLGREN 8001 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 VIRGIL W SPEARS LOURRIENE L SPEARS 8025 CITY RD 116 HAMEL MN 55340 VIRGIL W SPEARS LOURRIENE L SPEARS 8025 CITY RD 116 HAMEL MN 55340 DANIEL P CARLSON 8045 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 RONALD L RUEHLING 8065 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 DUANE J & JANICE C POPOVICH 8101 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 CHARLES & KAREN LYMANGOOD 8105 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 MR & MRS DAVID FOY 8115 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 THOMAS J & SUSAN STOCK 7202 TOPVIEW RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 JOHN C GLEASON 20310 CO RD NO 10 HAMEL MN 55340 ROBERT & THERESA CROUSE 20301 CO RD NO 10 HAMEL MN 55340 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 CO RD NO 116 CORCORAN MN 55340 DALE & PATRICIA PATNODE 1200 NICOLLET AVE #209 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 DALE PATNODE 1200 NICOLLET MALL #209 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 PERRY W & MARGARET L MILLER CHURCH OF ST THOMAS 20000 CO RD NO 10 HAMEL MN 55340 ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE CHURCH 20020 CO RD NO 10 HAMEL MN 55340 TONY M BARDEN 7909 CO RD NO 116 HAMEL MN 55340 E E E CE E E M A I L C E E M A I L E PROPANE TANK SS ROCK FLAG WELL CLVT CLVT CLVT E E E E ECE E E EC E E EE EE E EC E E EE E E E ECHCE E E E EC E E E E E E E EOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHP FO - C FO - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C F O - C FO - C E E C E E CLVT CLVT 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P OH P OH P OHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHP CTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BCTV-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BG-BPROPANE TANK EEE CLVT CLVT C TRAN SS FMFMFMFMFMFM FM FM FM FM F M FMFMl>>>CLVT CLVT CLVT CLVT CLVT CLVT E CLVT CLVTCLVT XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOHP OHP OHP OHP XXXX X TR A N E WETLAND 10 WETLAND 9 WETLAND 6 WETLAND 8 WETLAND 7 WETLAND 5 WETLAND 3 WETLAND 4 WETLAND 11 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 2 N 0 150 300 N 0 150 300 WETLAND BOUNDARY (TYP) WETLAND BUFFER (TYP) WETLAND SETBACK (TYP)CSAH 116C S A H 1 0 SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO.REVISION CHECKED Plot Date: 05/05/2021 - 4:54pmDrawing name: C:\pw_stn_bh_infra01\dms68138\193804970C002-GRADING.dwgXrefs:, 193804970XSXT, 193804970XSXW, 193804970XSXV, 193804970XBRD-GRADINGTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.M/I HOMESRUSH CREEK RESERVE, CORCORAN, MN193804970733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.comCONSTRUCTION PLANS - PHASE 1 GRADING2/3/21CITY SUBMITTAL TNA DAA, JLT, PJW DAA, JLT, PJW ESL ESLPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.DAVID AHRENS2/3/202121711EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C0.02 Elevations Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Minimum Elevation -24.285 -20.000 -15.000 -10.000 -5.000 0.000 5.000 10.000 Maximum Elevation -20.000 -15.000 -10.000 -5.000 0.000 5.000 10.000 15.173 Color WETLAND 10 WETLAND 9 WETLAND 6 WETLAND 8 WETLAND 7 WETLAND 5 WETLAND 3 WETLAND 4 WETLAND 11 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 2 PROPANE TANK SS ROCK FLAG WELL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CLVT CLVT CLVT PROPANE TANK SS FM F M FMFMFMlll>>>>> > CLVT CLVT CLVT XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>>> >>>>>> > > > >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>80THAVEWALNUTLN7 9 T H AVE W AL N U T L N XYLOIDAVE 78T H PL 80TH AVE PHASE 1 PROJECT LIMITS PHASE 1 PROJECT LIMITS PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX PX P X PX PX PX PX PX PX PX N 0 150 300 FILL (TYP.) CUT (TYP.) SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO. REVISION CHECKED Plot Date: 05/07/2021 - 4:52pmDrawing name: C:\pw_stn_bh_infra01\dms68138\193804970C301.dwgXrefs:, 193804970XSPV - PH 1, 193804970XSXT, 193804970XSNO-PH 1, 193804970-XSST Ph 1, 193804970XSXW, 193804970XBRD-GRADING,193804970XSNO-PH2,193804970XSPV-PH2THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLEFORALLDIMENSIONS. DONOT SCALETHEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BEREPORTEDTOSTANTECWITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THEPROPERTYOF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZEDBYSTANTECIS FORBIDDEN.M/I HOMESRUSH CREEK RESERVE, CORCORAN, MN 193804970CONSTRUCTION PLANS - PHASE 1 GRADING 2/3/21CITY SUBMITTAL TNA DAA, JLT, PJW DAA, JLT, PJW ESL ESLPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERMINNESOTA.DAVID AHRENS2/3/202121711GRADING PLAN - EARTHWORK BALANCE C3.07R Note: Volume ExGr vs FG Datum line represents earthwork volumes for entire project site. Volume ExGR vs FG - Phase 1 represents earthwork volumes for Phase 1 site. *Earthwork volumes calculated from existing ground to grading grade 1 CITY REVIEW 4/26/211 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 8c. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Request to Reconsider Application – Cook Lake Highlands Action Required: Approval Summary: An application for Cook Lake Highlands was reviewed at the meeting in which the City Council denied the application. The applicant has held additional meetings with neighboring residents and would like the Council to review a substantially similar application with a few minor tweaks. City ordinance includes the following language from section 1070.010: Whenever an application for an amendment has been considered and denied by the City Council, the Planning Commission or City Council shall not consider a similar application for an amendment affecting substantially the same property again for at least 6 months from the date of its denial. A subsequent application affecting substantially the same property shall likewise not be considered again by the Planning Commission or City Council for an additional 6 months from the date of the second denial unless a decision to reconsider such matter is made by not less than a majority of the full City Council. In order for the applicant to be able to have the application reviewed prior to the six- month date from denial, the City Council must authorize the applicant to do so. The application would need to go through the entire process again including the Planning Commission and proper public notice. Financial/Budget: The application requires fees to cover the costs associated with the review process. Options: 1. Approve the request to reconsider. 2. Deny the request to reconsider. Recommendation: If the City Council believes the application would likely be approved, it is recommended that the Council approve the request. If the Council does not believe the request would be approved, it is strongly recommended to deny the request so the applicant does not accumulate additional costs for the same result. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve or deny the request to reconsider a substantially similar application for Cook Lake Highlands. Page 2 Attachments: 1. Request for Reconsideration From:Beth Hustad To:Brad Martens; Kendra Lindahl Forwarding Subject:Cook Lake Highlands Date:Wednesday, May 19, 2021 1:21:14 PM Mr. Mayor, City Council Members, and Staff Within days following the April 22, 2021 City Council meeting upon which the City Council denied Trek Development ‘s request for the approval to rezone and develop Cook Lake Highlands (CLH), a neighbor reached out to me to ask that I walk the site with the two of them. The neighbor, Mary and Gerry Tucker live at 7402 Fir Lane, the first house on 74th and Fir Lane immediately adjacent to CLH previously proposed single family. Mary and Gerry wanted to walk the site with me to ask questions that would help them better understand what the proposal would look like if approved and developed, especially from their home. They wanted to learn more about the project proposal to voice and articulate their own opinion to the community, City Staff, Planning Commission and Council. On April 28, 2021 the three of us walked the site for 2 ½ hours discussing the grades, products, trees, trails and open space. Gerry and Mary suggested I also meet with other neighbors and walk the site to answer multiple questions about the previously presented project. They invited City Councilors and neighbors. I invited Brad Martens from City Staff and Alex Hall with Applewood/United Properties. Mary and Gerry sent an invite for a site walk with me on May 12, 2021 @ 2:00 PM. Upon the suggestion of two Councilors, I asked Jon Bottema to walk the site and bring his drone. On Saturday May 8, 2021 Councilor Bottema and I walked the site with his drone. The drone helped us see the height of the CLH proposed homes in comparison to the homes in Bass Lake Crossing along Fir Lane and adjacent to CLH. The drone also helped to identify the 49’ Applewood height as it would be built on proposed grade vs the existing grade. I asked our engineers to stake certain locations, such as the street, the cul de sac, some lot corners, and the location of the cross section provided at public hearings (a perspective across the site from Bass Lake Crossing homes to the Applewood). The engineers provided me with and a key identifying existing and proposed grades. Walking the site with this information helps provide a perspective of grades, building locations, heights and more accurate distances. It helps visualize the proposal. I have walked the site with each Council Member at different dates in the application process. I continue to encourage and welcome Councilors, Planning Commissioners and Staff to meet with me on site to walk and review the previous proposal as I did with the neighbors. On May 12, 2021 I walked the CLH site with neighbors interested in understanding the previous proposal. Councilor Bottema provided the drone perspective helping all present understand the height of the buildings based on the existing vs proposed grades. The neighborhood on site meeting concluded with the following consensus between Me/Developer and the neighbors: Summary of compromises, additions and agreements following the neighborhood on site meeting. 1. Developer will provide or cause builder to provide two conifers and one river birch (if available) per lot for the 12 lots along the trail/ western property edge. BB 6’ conifers and 1 ½” caliper for the deciduous trees, per Landscape Company description. 2. Alex Hall from United Properties confirmed that the Applewood building will not exceed 49’ from first floor grade including HVAC. 3. Possibly the homes will be M/I but not guaranteed. 4. The 12 single family homes adjacent to the trail/west property line, will be one story slab on grade, daylight, or walkout homes. The single family homes across the CLH street may be two story slab on grade, daylight, or walkout homes. 5. Keep park/open space on North property point as wooded buffer and nature habitat for existing neighbors, trail and future development to North. Dedicate the property north of the ravine as open park/open space in exchange for park fee credit for the single family lots only. Approximately $96,000 cash park fee credit. Considering the recent events, developments and neighborhood input described above, If the above section language applies to Cook Lake Highlands, I would like to formally request the City Council respectfully consider voting to waive the 6 month delay period at your May 27th Council meeting. Please note. I am happy to walk the site with you prior to May 27th Council meeting to answer questions and review the site plan as I did with the neighbors. Thank you! Best Regards, Elisabeth (Beth) Hustad President Trek Development, Inc 612.840.5233 The information contained in this message is client privileged and confidential information intended only for use of the individual or entity to which it was intended to be sent. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at 1-612-840-5233 or reply e-mail communication and delete the original message. Thank you. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 8d. Council Meeting: May 27, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Conditional Uses in Zoning Districts Action Required: Direction Summary: At the May 13, 2021 Council meeting, a discussion of conditional uses on zoning districts took place and the Council requested the discussion be continued at the May 27th meeting. Staff requests direction on how to proceed with potential action to amend the zoning districts. Staff completed a review of vacant land available in districts other than the rural residential district which is the second attachment to this report. A third attachment includes the areas in the rural residential district. Using that analysis, the following table was created for your information: Total Acreage Vacant Acreage RR 13,859 4,366 RMF-2 105 92 RMF-3 - - TCR 192 67 CR 90 22 C-2 189 80 I-1 483 161 GMU 232 88 Additionally, Councilmember Nichols provided the fourth and fifth attachments showing locations where certain uses could be allowed compared to where currently allowed. Financial/Budget: If no additional staff review or recommendation is requested, there are minimal costs to the update. Staff however feels there are ramifications that should be discussed. Due to the significant amount of land use updates already taking place this year, 60% of the dedicated budget has already been spent in the first quarter of 2021. If this is a priority of the Council, with sufficient review, this will have budget implications. Options: 1. Direct staff to schedule a public hearing at the July 1, 2021 Planning Commission meeting 2. Send back to staff for further review. 3. Take no action at this time. Page 2 Recommendation: If the Council is in support of the changes as recommended by Councilmember Nichols, staff recommends a full staff review be completed so the Planning Commission and City Council can fully understand the outcome of the potential action. Council Action: Direct staff on action for the recommended zoning changes from Councilmember Nichols. Attachments: 1. Zoning Change Table 2. Vacant Land Analysis – No Rural Residential 3. Vacant Land Analysis – Including Rural Residential 4. Zoning Map Proposed Changes 5. Zoning Map - Current !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!! ! !!! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STIEG RD WILLOW DRIVEHACKAMORE ROADTRAIL HAVEN ROADCAIN ROADO A K D A L E D R STREHLER ROAD PIONEER TR COUNTY ROAD 117 ROLLLING HILLS RDLARKIN RD TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CITY OF GREENFIELDCITY OF MAPLE GROVESCOTT LAKEBECHTOLD ROAD$+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUSH CREEK Vacant Land Analysis 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Vacant Land Yes, RMF-2 Yes, GMU Yes, TCR Yes, CR Yes, C-2 Yes, I-1 !!!!!2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area City Limit Open Water Shoreland Overlay District Corcoran Parcels 19 10 30 116 101 50 19 10 ± !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!! ! !!! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ROAD SCHUTTE GLEASON ROAD JUBERT LAKE MEISTER ROAD O L D S E T T L E R S R D HORSESHOE TRAIL STIEG RD WILLOW DRIVEHACKAMORE ROADTRAIL HAVEN ROADCAIN ROADO A K D A L E D R STREHLER ROAD PIONEER TR COUNTY ROAD 117 ROLLLING HILLS RDLARKIN RD TOWNSHIP OF HASSAN CITY OF GREENFIELDCITY OF MAPLE GROVESCOTT LAKEBECHTOLD ROAD$+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ $+ MORIN LAKE GOOSE LAKE COOK LAKE RUSH CREEK Vacant Land Analysis 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Vacant Land Yes, RR Yes, RMF-2 Yes, GMU Yes, TCR Yes, CR Yes, C-2 Yes, I-1 !!!!!2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area City Limit Open Water Shoreland Overlay District Corcoran Parcels 19 10 30 116 101 50 19 10 ± STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 9a. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson Topic: Hackamore Road Improvements – 75% Design Action Required: Approval Summary: Planning for street improvements to Hackamore Road are underway along the border of Corcoran and Medina. The existing road is reaching its life expectancy and increasing transportation demands as a result of development activity continue to impact the corridor. On June 11, 2020, council approved street design layout Option 2 – Two Lane Design with Right and Left Turn Lanes and authorized WSB to proceed with completion of a 75% design which provided the opportunity for the cities to refine costs, analyze funding mechanisms, and complete a cohesive plan guiding the transportation needs, stormwater management, right-of-way, and pedestrian mobility of this corridor. Option 2 – Two Lane Design with Right and Left Turn Lanes • Improves safety with dedicated turn lanes and pedestrian facilities • Minimizes adjacent impacts • More shifts to the roadway and trail alignments • Narrower street widths in some locations; less costly Based on the information provided in this memorandum and the input from staff in both cities, it is recommended that the 75% design vision for the Hackamore Road Improvement Project be considered for approval by both cities. Approval from the City Council will not constitute an authorization for funding or construction of the project(s). It is recommended that staff and Councils in both cities plan for future funding discussions prior to consideration of final design, phasing, and timelines for the project. Financial/Budget: The cost to provide the engineering design services will be shared 50/50 by the cities of Corcoran and Medina. Corcoran will pay for its portion of the engineering design services with funds received from developer contributions. Options: 1. Approve the 75% design vision for the Hackamore Road Improvement project. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Page 2 Recommendation: Approve the 75% design vision for the Hackamore Road Improvement project. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve the 75% design vision for the Hackamore Road Improvement project. Attachments: 1. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – 75% Design Memorandum K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Honorable Mayors and City Councils City of Corcoran City of Medina From: Jim Stremel, PE - Senior Project Manager, WSB Date: May 13, 2021 Re: Hackamore Road Improvement Project – 75% Design WSB Project No. R-015661-000 Project Scope & Background The Hackamore Road Improvement Project, extending from Medina Lake Drive to the approach of Brockton Lane N (CR 101), was initiated jointly by the City of Corcoran and the City of Medina. The project was initiated to address deteriorating and insufficient infrastructure, and to develop a cohesive plan that both cities can provide to adjacent property owners and developers to guide transportation needs, right-of-way, pedestrian mobility, and stormwater management needs in the area. This memorandum constitutes a summary of the engineering work completed to a level of 75% design. Approval of the vision and design of the corridor from the City Councils’ will not constitute an authorization for funding or construction of the project. The preparation of the 75% plans will also provide the basis to implement the project vision with potential phasing of construction as one large project or as smaller multiple projects involving various stakeholders. Information and materials used in the preparation of this report were collected from the City of Corcoran, City of Medina, Hennepin County, MnDOT, and other impacted agencies. This data included: · Existing and historic traffic volume data · Current crash history · Proposed and anticipated development plans · As-built roadway plans · Survey/topographic data previously obtained or readily available · Wetland and floodplain locations from available delineations, GIS, or other mapping · Property Owner and Stakeholder engagement data · City franchise agreements with private utility companies · Soil borings and geotechnical report by Haugo Geotechnical Services, June 2019 Existing Conditions The project corridor extends from Medina Lake Drive to the intersection at Brockton Lane N (CR 101). The existing Hackamore Road is currently a 24-foot wide, bituminous paved rural section; no pedestrian facilities exist along this section of roadway. The alignment of the roadway is generally straight with no horizontal curves. The current posted speed is 40 MPH in both directions. Based on a 40 MPH speed, a vertical curve on the easterly portion of the project (the westerly approach to CR 101) is deficient and does not provide the required sight distance. Crash data from the past 3 years (2017-2019) was collected for the Hackamore Road corridor. The data shows that over the past three years there has been 11 crashes in the corridor. 10 of K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx the crashes have occurred at the County Road intersections and just one at the internal street intersections. Table 1 show the crash data by year for each location. Table 1: Crash Summary by Year Location 2017 2018 2019 Total Crashes PI PD PI PD PI PD Hackamore Road at Pinto Dr (CSAH 116) 0 2 0 1 1 1 5 Hackamore Road at Hunter Road 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Hackamore Road at Brocton Lane (CSAH 101) 1 1 1 1 0 1 5 PD = Property Damage, PI = Personal Injury Pavements in the study area are aging and experiencing differing severities of stresses including alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking, and transverse cracking. Areas of isolated pavement settlement also exist throughout the project area. The Geotechnical Exploration Report, by Haugo Geotechnical Services in June 2019, can be provided upon request. Currently, there is not a storm sewer collection system within Hackamore Road. The existing roadway is a rural section road with ditches along a majority of the length of the roadway. Driveway culverts are present at existing driveway approaches to the road. Additionally, there are 4 culverts that convey drainage across the roadway. There are existing drainage issues that have been identified both by residents and engineering observation and analysis. Specifically, there is a low point in the corridor to the west of Hackamore Circle. Currently, water pools on private property along both sides of the roadway at this location. This drainage issue will involve working with adjacent property owners on the north side of the road to determine if property is available for stormwater management. There are no existing sanitary sewer systems within Hackamore Road. There is an existing 8” PVC watermain section located along the south side of Hackamore in the boulevard between Hunter Drive and Bergamot Drive with a crossing to Corcoran at Bergamot Drive for use as an emergency interconnection. Existing traffic volume data for the primary intersections was collected based on traffic counts conducted the week of March 9, 2020. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. The existing 2020 peak hour and average daily traffic (ADT) traffic counts for the corridor are shown on the attached figure in Appendix D and used for the traffic forecasting and operations analysis in this report. Traffic Forecasting Analysis In order to analyze the lane configuration and traffic control needs in the corridor, traffic forecasts were prepared for the twenty-year design (year 2040) condition, representing the full development of the area. 2040 traffic volumes were determined for the project by projecting the existing 2020 traffic counts to the 2040 design year. The projections included: · Background traffic growth of 1% / year. · Estimating the traffic volume from the current adjacent development that is yet to be completed. · Estimating the traffic volumes from proposed future development in the corridor. K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx The trip generation used to estimate the proposed area traffic is based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The projected 2040 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, assuming full development of the area traffic, are shown on the attached figure in Appendix D. Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations analysis was completed by evaluating the existing and projected traffic operations for the Hackamore Road project area, including the intersections of: · Medina Lake Drive / Future Development Access · Foxberry Drive · Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) · Future Development Access · Hunter Road / Future Development Access · Bergamot Drive / Steeple Chase Lane · Proposed Development Access (Church) · Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) The intersections in the corridor were evaluated during the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro/SimTraffic micro simulation software. The results are derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The software was used to evaluate the characteristics of the roadway network including lane geometrics, turning movement volumes, traffic control, and signal timing. The results of the operations analysis is provided in Appendix D for the Existing year 2020 Conditions, year 2040 without any improvements conditions, and year 2040 with proposed improvements condition. The table shows worse levels of service in 2040 if no improvements are made, and improved levels of service in 2040 if the improvements are made. Turn Lane Analysis Based on the Forecasted 2040 traffic conditions a turn lane analysis was completed for the primary intersections in project area. The analysis was conducted to determine the turn lanes needed to accommodate the existing and future development on Hackamore Road. Criteria and guidance reviewed included: · MnDOT Road Design Manual · MnDOT Access Management Manual · MnDOT / LRRB (Local Road Research Board) Research Report 2008-14: Turn Lane Lengths for Various Speed Road and Evaluation of Determining Criteria · NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study Intersection locations to future developments were provided with 30% design and are based on either an existing development plan (Tavera development), or site constraints such as proximity to other intersections, wetlands, or undesirable topography. The proposed intersection at the future development site located at 19200 Hackamore road is placed at the recommended minimum distance to County Road 101. The proposed intersection location at the future development site located at 19600 Hackamore road is placed at a convenient access point that is east of the existing wetlands and that would be ideal for aligning with any future development access to the south of Hackamore Road. K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx During the 75%, design right-of-way constraints associated with the location of the pedestrian path required the additional review of the westbound right turn lane at Hunter Road. Based on further review of the turn lane criteria, it was determined that the right turn lane could be eliminated. All other turn lanes recommended in the turn lane location analysis were implemented per the 30% design evaluation and recommendations. The full turn lane analysis report can be found in Appendix D and graphically shown in the project plans/exhibits in Appendices A & B. Proposed Improvements During the 30% design phase of the project, two options were considered for the roadway, turn lane, and pedestrian alignments. Option 1 was comprised of a continuous center left turn lane, right turn lanes at designated intersections, and one through lane in each direction. The second option included dedicated left and right turn lanes as necessary, and one through lane in each direction. The cities choose to proceed to 75% design with Option 2. This option was less costly, while maintaining beneficial corridor improvements to accommodate current and future traffic levels, by decreasing the impervious surface, lowering the stormwater management needs, and minimizing wetland impacts in comparison to Option 1. The final trail configuration was a combination of Options 1 and 2, with the boulevard width maximized where future development could accommodate the additional impacts and minimized or eliminated adjacent to existing developed property. The detail in this memo will focus on the improvements of the preferred option (Option 2). Road Geometric Comparisons: The proposed improvements include roadway pavement reclamation, subbase reconstruction, intersection improvements, and trail construction on the north side of Hackamore Road. The roadway will be a combination of both a rural and urban street section. Curb and gutter is proposed for locations needing additional drainage collection/conveyance, where the trail will be located at the back of curb to decrease the overall roadway width, and at the intersections with CR 116 and CR 101. The roadway section includes dedicated left and right turn lanes as necessary, and one through lane in each direction. The trail location is generally close to (with varying widths of boulevard) or abutting the edge of the roadway. Hackamore Road is a designated by both cities as a State Aid roadway. The existing roadway alignment meets all horizontal curve requirements but does not meet the vertical curve requirements at the east end of the project on the westerly approach to CR 101 for a 40 MPH posted speed limit. In order to meet State Aid requirements and the required sight distance, the proposed design lengthens this vertical curve, which would require grading to lower the elevation by a minimum of one foot. Pedestrian & Bicycle Improvements: Currently, there are no pedestrian facilities along Hackamore Road. However, pedestrian facilities do exist on the east side of the CR 101 intersection extending to the north and south and in the southwest quadrant of CR 116 extending to the south. The proposed pedestrian improvements on Hackamore Road extend the full length of the project corridor from Medina Lake Drive to Brockton Lane N (CR 101). The proposed multi-use bituminous trail is 8-feet wide with a boulevard of varying width. Where the trail is adjacent to the roadway or at back of curb, the trail will be 10-feet wide to meet clear zone requirements. The use of a retaining wall at the eastern end of the project, near CR 101, is necessary to facilitate the vertical curve adjustments for State Aid standards and contain impacts within the existing ROW to the greatest extent possible. If the adjacent property is subdivided, the City of Corcoran may have the opportunity to request additional permanent easements and eliminate the retaining wall. K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx As part of the pedestrian and trail plans, crossing improvements are proposed at both CR 116 and CR 101, including push buttons on the signals and crosswalk markings. An uncontrolled pedestrian crossing is being considered near Hunter Drive. The final determination of the crossing location will be made during final design in consideration of the location of the future development accesses to the south of Hackamore Road and available right-of-way. Based on comments received from property owners and both City Councils, six-foot bituminous shoulders were included on the north and south sides of Hackamore Road to accommodate additional bicycle traffic. This is intended to reduce the conflict between pedestrians and bicycles that may occur on the multi-use trail on the north side of Hackamore Road. Intersection Improvements: In addition to the improvements on Hackamore Road, turn lane and intersection improvements are proposed on CR 116 and CR 101. Right turn lanes on CR 116 are proposed on the northbound and southbound directions to accommodate additional vehicular operations; additional northbound or southbound turn lanes on CR 101 are not proposed. Signal improvements at both Hennepin County intersections will be necessary due to the widening of Hackamore Road and the addition of improved pedestrian crossings. Roadway reconstruction is also proposed for the CR 47 approach to Hackamore Road, east of CR 101, to accommodate the revised traffic pattern and turn lanes. The City of Plymouth is currently working on the preliminary design for a larger CR 47 project as a part of the future turn-back process with Hennepin County. The project will include improvements up to and potentially including the intersection at CR 101. At this time, it is anticipated that the CR 47 improvements will be included with the City of Plymouth project. Further discussions between the cities will be needed to determine what portions of the intersection at CR 101 could be included with the CR 47 project and how the costs would be shared between each city. The improvements to CR 47 east of CR 101 have not been included with the cost estimate, but half of the CR 101 signal improvements were included. Street/Pavement Section: Two 10-ton street sections were proposed within the geotechnical report previously completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services in 2019. The first recommended section consisted of 6 ½ inches of bituminous over 18 inches of aggregate base, the second section consisted of 6 inches of bituminous, 10 inches of aggregate base, and 18 inches of select granular borrow sub-base. Both meet the granular equivalency requirements for the project. City staff determined that the most conservative option should be considered. With that in mind, the second street section was considered for 75% design and the cost estimations included with this memorandum. During final design, either a combination of both sections (depending on the prevailing underlying soil conditions) or utilize only the first street section option to further reduce the overall roadway costs of the project. In addition, where the soil borings indicated poor underlying conditions, excavation and replacement of the materials has been included with the cost estimate. The full report can be provided upon request. Full plan and profile sheets along with typical sections of the proposed roadway design are included in Appendices A & B, respectively. A full 75% plan set will be provided to the cities at the conclusion of this design phase. Sanitary Sewer & Watermain: There are no sanitary sewer or watermain improvements proposed as part of this project. The City of Corcoran is planning to install watermain between the Ravinia development, the future development east of CR 116, and the Tavera development as a future separate project. It is K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx likely that the watermain would be installed via directional drilling within easements along these developments and under the bituminous trail where easements cannot be obtained. Right-of-Way Considerations: Additional right-of-way and/or easements will need to be acquired from parcels identified for development due to the widening of Hackamore Road, the installation of pedestrian facilities on the north side of the roadway, and for the stormwater treatment ponds. The necessary right-of- way and/or easement acquisition needs have been minimized through the alignment and location of the trail and boulevard widths, and no permanent improvements are proposed on private property that is not identified as a future development site. However, grading will be necessary on many private properties and temporary easements will need to be acquired by the cities to accomplish this. No costs for temporary or permanent easement acquisition have been included in the estimates. Stormwater Management & Floodplain Impacts: Proposed stormwater improvements throughout the Hackamore Road reconstruction project include a combination of rural roadway sections, storm sewer within the urban roadway sections to meet State Aid requirements, and stormwater treatment areas to capture and retain stormwater in accordance with the City of Corcoran, the City of Medina, and Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) requirements. Impacts to the 100-year floodplain are not anticipated with this project. Under existing conditions, the north half of Hackamore Road discharges north into Corcoran and the south half discharges south into Medina. There are five existing centerline culverts that will be replaced in-kind with this project. The proposed design will generally maintain existing drainage/discharge patterns and balance BMP footprint between Medina and Corcoran. There are a few locations in the corridor where drainage patterns will need to be modified due to pending developments. Proposed drainage patterns and routing is shown on the drainage map in Appendix E. · The area shown in orange, west of CR 116 will be routed entirely to the pending Tavera development in Corcoran. · The area shown in blue, west of Hackamore Circle, will be routed entirely to a BMP on the north side of the road. This maintains the existing drainage patterns since there is an existing centerline culvert that conveys the road runoff in this location. · The area in green, east of Hackamore Circle, will be routed entirely to the Reserve and future development in Medina. · The drainage patterns to the east of Steeple Chase Lane remain the same as existing conditions, generally split by the roadway centerline. The project is required to meet rate control, volume control, and water quality requirements for the net increase in impervious surface area from the proposed improvements. A combination of best management practices (BMPs) are proposed to meet the stormwater requirements within adjacent developments. The drainage figure included in Appendix E illustrates where stormwater runoff from Hackamore Road will be routed and treated. Some of the ponding locations that are located further into pending developments have not been shown graphically. A preliminary HydroCAD model was built to analyze runoff rates from the project limits. As a linear project, the roadway corridor discharges off-site in multiple locations. Proposed runoff rates at each discharge point are less than or equal to existing runoff rates. The adjacent development BMPs will be utilized to provide rate control. To meet the volume control requirement, 1.1-inches of runoff must be abstracted from the net new impervious surface. In total, the project creates 4.44 acres of net new impervious surface, correlating to a required volume of 17,729 CF. Volume control is provided via the adjacent development BMPs. Retention volume will be provided via biofiltration as soils are not conducive K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx to infiltration. Abstraction will also be provided via irrigation reuse, particularly in the development areas. The developments will be responsible for sizing BMPs to adequately treat Hackamore Road runoff. The estimated volume with the future adjacent developments is 19,862 CF. ECWMC requires no net increase in total phosphorus or total suspended solids from existing to proposed conditions on an annual basis. The adjacent development BMPs will be utilized to meet water quality requirements. Permits/Approvals This project as proposed will result in disturbing more than one acre of underlying subgrade material, and therefore, a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will be required. Because the proposed project will disturb more than 1 acre of land and create 1 or more acres of new impervious surface, an ECWMC permit is required prior to the commencement of construction. A pre-application meeting was held on April 23, 2020 with ECWMC and the cities of Medina and Corcoran to discuss the project intent and requirements. The minutes were included with the 30% memorandum and can be provided upon request. Proposed impervious surfaces will be routed to existing BMPs to the maximum extent possible to minimize project costs. In some cases, the proposed BMPs capture existing and new impervious surface area, accounting for new impervious areas that are unable to be captured or treated. ECWMC is amenable to this approach. ECWMC permit approval will likely include a contingency for phased construction of Hackamore concurrent with the construction of the adjacent developments. A permit from Hennepin County will also be needed for the work within the county right-of-way on both CR 101 and CR 116. If the cities propose to utilize State Aid funds, plan review and approval will also be required by MnDOT. Wetland impacts will occur as a result of the project. The project will require permitting through the Wetland Conservation Act, US Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Natural Resources, and ECWMC. Permit applications will be prepared after the 75% design is complete. Mitigation for wetland impacts will be required at a 2:1 ratio. The Board of Water and Soil Resources’ Local Road Replacement Program will be reviewed to determine if the project meets the requirements for replacement. It is anticipated that a majority of the wetland impacts will meet the requirements and will not require the cities to purchase wetland credits. For any impacts that do not meet the requirements, mitigation is recommended through the purchase of wetland credits as it is more cost-effective than on-site mitigation. In addition, there is little to no upland available within the existing right-of-way so on-site mitigation would need to be identified in an adjacent development. Private Utilities There are private utilities currently located within the proposed project area. Based on Gopher State One Call ticket information and the topographic survey, known utility owners include: · CenturyLink [Telephone] · Comcast [Internet/Television] · Wright Hennepin Coop [Communications] · CenterPoint Energy [Gas] · Xcel Energy [Gas/Electric] · Arvig [Fiber] · Mediacom [Fiber] · Zayo Group [Fiber] The roadway impacts to private utilities have been minimized to the greatest extent possible, but relocations will be necessary for utility poles and potentially some underground infrastructure. Known utility owners have been notified of the proposed improvements. A utility coordination K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx meeting was conducted on Thursday, May 20th, 2021 in which the 75% plans were provided to the private utility company representatives. The utility relocations are primarily needed to meet the State Aid requirement of a minimum 10- foot clear zone, measured from the edge of the outside through-traffic lane; Hackamore Road is classified as a “Suburban Undivided” roadway. A significant number of utility poles and sections of the existing gas main at the edge of the existing roadway do not meet the current clear zone requirements and will be in direct conflict with the trail, roadway, or proposed clear zone. Table 2: Private Utilities Utility Name Impacted (Based on GSOC Response) City of Corcoran City of Medina Available Franchise Agreement Corcoran Available Franchise Agreement Medina Century Link Yes Yes Yes No No Comcast NA NA NA Yes No Wright Hennepin Co-op Yes Yes Yes Yes No CenterPoint Energy Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Xcel Energy Yes No Yes No Yes Arvig NA NA NA No No Mediacom Yes Yes Yes No Yes Zayo Group No No No No No 75% Plans As part of the 75% Design, a plan set has been created. The plans have been prepared to meet State Aid submission standards in preparation for potential funding during final design. The plans were also prepared to provide the information necessary for a submittal to the watershed district for stormwater management permitting at the conclusion of 75% design. Plan Set Inclusions: · Title Sheet · General Project Layout · Removal Plans · Street and Storm Sewer Plans · Stormwater Basin Plans · Signing and Striping Plans · Signal Improvement Plans · Erosion Control Plans · Cross Sections Exclusions: · Standard Details · Project Phasing Plans · Traffic Control Plans Additional plan sheets for project phasing, traffic control, standard details, or other more detailed design will be addressed during final design once funding and phasing of the project has been finalized. K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx Appendix A includes street and storm sewer plan and profile sheet excerpts from the full plan set. These sheets provide the proposed site layout and horizontal geometry and alignment, as well as the vertical alignment of Hackamore Road. A roll plot which depicts the entire corridor can be provided for reviewing upon request. Project Cost Estimates & Funding Opinion of Probable Cost: A detailed opinion of probable cost can be found in Appendix C of this report. The opinion of probable cost incorporates estimated 2022 construction costs and includes a 10% construction contingency factor. Indirect costs are projected at 25% of the construction cost and include engineering, legal, financing, and administrative costs. The table below provides a summary of the opinions of probable cost for the proposed improvements. Table 3: Estimated Project Cost Summary Description Estimated Project Cost Street Improvements $ 4,509,000 Trail Improvements $ 607,000 Wetland Mitigation $ 20,000 Storm Sewer Improvements $ 701,000 CR 116 Intersection Costs $ 585,000 CR 101 Signal Improvements $ 280,000 Grand Total for Project $ 6,702,000 The above costs in Table 4 are estimated costs for roadway, storm sewer, stormwater improvements, intersection improvements, and minor utility impacts. At this time, costs have not been reduced in consideration of the potential for adjacent development to share in the cost of trail and stormwater management improvements. The CR 101 signal improvements have been split in half, assuming a cost share with Plymouth and Maple Grove. Assumptions & Inclusions: · Right-of-way or other improvements associated with stormwater management improvements/ponding within adjacent future developments (meeting governing requirements) will be provided at no cost to the cities (negotiated with development agreements). · Costs to mitigate disturbances for proposed roadway improvements where pertinent, mitigation will occur through the purchase of wetland credits and not on-site mitigation. No contingency or overhead were included with the cost of the wetland credits. · Lighting and dynamic signage for the proposed crosswalk at Hunter. Exclusions: · Obtaining right-of-way for proposed improvements encroaching within single-family properties (costs are not anticipated). · Costs to mitigate wetlands within adjacent development for ponding needs. · The cost of stormwater treatment/ponding (rate or volume) even if shown on plans. K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx · Costs for private utility relocations after a review of the available franchise agreements provided by the cities. There may be costs associated with relocations if other franchise agreements exist that were not received. · Costs associated with improvements east of CR 101 along CR 47. · Lighting at proposed development intersections, developers will be responsible for costs. Potential Project Funding: Funding for the Hackamore Road improvements is proposed to come from a combination of City of Medina and City of Corcoran funds, and cost sharing agreements with adjacent development projects. Hackamore Road has been designated as a State Aid route by both cities. State Aid funding may be considered in the future, and design guidelines for State Aid roadways have been accounted for in the preparation of the proposed improvements. Special assessments to benefiting single-family property owners are not being proposed by either city at this time. Potential cost sharing agreement partners include Hennepin County for the work within the county road intersections and signals at CR 116 and CR 101. There is also a cost share opportunity for the portion of CR 47 east of CR 101 with Hennepin County, cities of Plymouth and Maple Grove that may also include all or a portion of the full intersection improvements. Lastly, a Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) grant application was submitted through MnDOT for the proposed improvements, at the time of this report the cities are waiting on a response on this grant award. Community Engagement & Agency Coordination During 30% design, City engineering staff met with the City of Plymouth, City of Maple Grove, and Hennepin County to discuss proposed improvements along Hackamore Road. The most critical portions of the project with respect to these agencies are the intersections at CR 116, and CR 101. To gather information from adjacent property owners a Virtual Open House meeting was held on May 19, 2020. Preliminary information was presented regarding the concept plans and impacts associated with the project. Approximately 20 residents were in attendance, as well as council members in both cities, city staff from both the City of Medina and the City of Corcoran, and WSB engineering representatives. Lastly, Social Pinpoint was used to gather additional information from property owners. The site included an interactive map to compare the existing conditions, Option 1, and Option 2, as well as a space to add comments on the various options. A summary of the meeting minutes and property owner feedback is included with the 30% Street Design Memorandum. Formal engagement with the cities of Plymouth, Maple Grove, and Hennepin County was not conducted during the 75% design phase. The City of Plymouth is currently in the preliminary stages of design for the turnback of CR 47. The improvements within this corridor are planned to be improved in multiple phases. For construction in 2022, The City is considering the portion from CR 47 to Peony Lane and may include improvements to the intersection of CR 101. Plymouth is planning to reach out to the project stakeholders, including the cities of Corcoran and Medina, in the coming weeks to discuss cost sharing opportunities. There may be an opportunity for cooperative project coordination and cost participation from all cities (Plymouth, Maple Grove, Corcoran, and Medina). Coordination with this project would also provide the potential for more cost-effective improvements for all cities. The City of Plymouth is planning to meet with all cities and Hennepin County prior to finalizing their improvement project. K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx Proposed Schedule Proposed construction for the improvements will likely occur in several phases, based on the progress of adjacent developments and/or other adjacent public projects (i.e. CR 47 turnback by the City of Plymouth). At the time final design commences, it is anticipated that schedules for the construction of adjacent developments in the City of Corcoran and the City of Medina would be known and the project could proceed at that time. Further discussion with all project stakeholders will need to occur with final design. Summary and Recommendation The Hackamore Road Improvement Project includes roadway, stormwater, intersection, signal, and pedestrian improvements from Medina Lake Drive to Brockton Lane N (CR 101). The existing roadway has been identified for improvements by both the City of Corcoran and the City of Medina due to the deteriorating pavement and the need to accommodate the additional traffic volumes with increased development in the area. The project design was initiated to address deteriorating and insufficient infrastructure, and to develop a cohesive plan that both cities can provide to adjacent property owners and developers to guide the transportation needs, right-of- way, and other anticipated infrastructure improvements. The current level of completion with 75% design provides the opportunity for the cities to further pursue funding mechanisms and cost share agreements with adjacent developers, cities of Maple Grove/Plymouth, Hennepin County, and pursue potential grant funding. The preparation of these plans for the proposed improvements is an important step in the planning for adjacent development access, including the necessary right-of-way, stormwater management connections/treatment, pedestrian facilities/connections, and the ability to implement the vision with potential phasing of construction as one large project or as smaller multiple projects involving various stakeholders. Based on the information provided in this memorandum and the input from staff in both cities, it is recommended that the 75% design vision for the Hackamore Road Improvement Project be considered for approval by both cities. Approval from the City Councils’ will not constitute an authorization for funding or construction of the project(s). It is recommended that staff and Councils in both cities plan for future funding discussions prior to consideration of final design, phasing, and timelines for the project. List of Figures and Appendices Appendix A – 75% Street & Storm Sewer Plans Appendix B – Typical Sections Appendix C – Detailed Opinion of Project Costs Appendix D – Traffic Analysis, Figures, Tables Appendix E – Drainage Map K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx Appendix A 75% Street & Storm Sewer Plans BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTOHE 99+00 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 50035002 5004 5001 500015"15"15"15"15" 8 10 PEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPETE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TETETETE970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 988.6988.3988.5988.7989.0989.6990.0990.2990.3990.2989.9989.4988.9988.6988.0987.4987.0988.62988.90989.18989.46989.74990.02990.27990.24989.88989.38988.88988.38987.88987.38986.89986.6199+00 99+50 100+00 100+50 101+00 101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50 104+00 104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION 0.56%-1.00%PVIS:98+75.07PVIE:988.48PVIS:102+37.26 PVIE:990.51 AD:1.56 K:76.91 120.00' VC BVCS:101+77.26BVCE:990.17EVCS:102+97.26EVCE:989.91HP STA:102+20.35 HP ELEV:990.29 PVIS:106+50.00 PVIE:986.38 AD:1.50 K:80.00 120.00' VC BVCS:105+90.00BVCE:986.98PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE 198' - 15" RCP CL V @ 0.50% 5002STA 100+90.31-25.05 LTRIM=989.21(48"Ø)INV: 984.13 (W) INV: 982.64 (E) 265' - 15" RCP CL V @ 0.50% 5003STA 103+55.62-29.67 LTRIM=988.76(48"Ø)INV: 981.31 (W) INV: 984.21 (S) INV: 981.21 (E) 287' - 15" RCP CL V @ 0.50% INV: 985.22 (S) INV: 985.12 (E) 5001STA 98+92.16-17.86 LTRIM=988.01(48"Ø)INV: 981.38 (E) INV: 981.08 (W) INV: 980.98 (N) 5005STA 103+82.53-30.05 LTRIM=988.70(48"Ø)74' - 15" RCP CL V @ 1.12% HACKAMORE ROAD LOCATION SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:43:30 AMN S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)MATCHLINE STA: 105+50SEE SHEET 12MATCHLINE STA: 105+50SEE SHEET 12WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 11 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS 4730 SETTLERS COURT LUKE & RACHEL HAMMER 4777 MEDINA LAKE DRIVE SCOTT A & PEGGY A WEAVER 20202 HACKAMORE RD RUTH M MCKOWN 4780 MEDINA LAKE DRIVE GEORGE & HEATHER ALLENDORPH MEDINA LAKE ROAD3' WIDE CURB CUT OVER EXISTING CULVERT 3' WIDE CURB CUT OVER EXISTING CULVERT B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PID 3511923430001 LENNAR DEVELOPMENT TAVERA 1ST BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGEUGEUGEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEOHEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 5009 5008 5006 5007 501015"12"12"8 PEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPETE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TETETETETETETETE970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 988.0987.4987.0986.8986.6986.8987.0987.3987.7987.9988.1988.2988.4988.5988.4988.1987.8987.38986.89986.61986.64986.88987.13987.38987.63987.88988.13988.34988.47988.51988.47988.34988.13987.88106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 108+00 108+50 109+00 109+50 110+00 110+50 111+00 111+50 112+00 112+50 113+00 113+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION -1.00%0.50%-0.50% PVIS:111+50.00 PVIE:988.88 AD:1.00 K:300.00 300.00' VC BVCS:110+00.00BVCE:988.13EVCS:113+00.00EVCE:988.13HP STA:111+50.00 HP ELEV:988.51 PVIS:106+50.00 PVIE:986.38 AD:1.50 K:80.00 120.00' VC BVCS:105+90.00BVCE:986.98EVCS:107+10.00EVCE:986.68LP STA:106+70.00 LP ELEV:986.58 PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE 5007STA 106+69.61-34.55 LTRIM=986.58(48"Ø)INV: 982.92 (S) INV: 982.82 (W) HACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:43:37 AMN MATCHLINE STA: 105+50SEE SHEET 11MATCHLINE STA: 112+50SEE SHEET 13MATCHLINE STA: 112+50SEE SHEET 13LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 12 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS 4780 MEDINA LAKE DRIVE GEORGE & HEATHER ALLENDORPH 4795 FOXBERRY DRIVE VINCENT L & JOYCE S HAYDEN FOXBERRY DRIVEB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PID 3511923410002 LENNAR DEVELOPMENT TAVERA 1ST BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGTUGTUGTUGTF/OF/OF/OF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEOHEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE UGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 118+00 119+00 5011 5012 5103 5013 5101 5100 5102 12"12" 15"24"8 8 PEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPETE TE TE TE TE TE TETETETETETETETETETE 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 988.4988.1987.8988.2987.7987.4987.1987.1987.2987.3987.5987.8988.3988.7989.6990.6991.5988.34988.13987.88988.18987.71987.43987.18987.08987.18987.43987.68987.93988.18988.65989.43990.43991.43113+00 113+50 114+00 114+50 115+00 115+50 116+00 116+50 117+00 117+50 118+00 118+50 119+00 119+50 120+00 120+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION -0.50%3.00%-3.00% -0.50%0.50% 2.00%PVIS:113+84.25PVIE:987.71PVIS:114+17.16PVIE:988.70PVIS:114+51.40PVIE:987.67PVIS:111+50.00 PVIE:988.88 AD:1.00 K:300.00 300.00' VC EVCS:113+00.00EVCE:988.13PVIS:116+00.00 PVIE:986.93 AD:1.00 K:120.00 120.00' VC BVCS:115+40.00BVCE:987.23EVCS:116+60.00EVCE:987.23LP STA:116+00.00 LP ELEV:987.08 PVIS:119+00.00 PVIE:988.43 AD:1.50 K:80.00 120.00' VC BVCS:118+40.00BVCE:988.13EVCS:119+60.00EVCE:989.63PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE INV: 984.74 (N) INV: 984.74 (SW) 43' - 12" RCP CL V @ 0.56% 5103STA 115+37.06-36.76 LTRIM=986.54(48"Ø)INV: 982.35 (W) 72' - 24" RCP CL V @ 0.24% 5012STA 113+41.9024.22 RTRIM=987.22(48"Ø)5101STA 114+67.77-36.67 LTRIM=986.99(60"Ø)INV: 982.00 (E) INV: 981.79 (S) INV: 981.69 (N) 69' - 15" RCP CL V @ 0.50% HACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:43:45 AMN MATCHLINE STA: 112+50SEE SHEET 12MATCHLINE STA: 119+50SEE SHEET 14MATCHLINESEE SHEET 22 MATCHLINESEE SHEET 22 MATCHLINE STA: 119+50SEE SHEET 14LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 13 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS 19800 HACKAMORE ROAD LAKEVIEW DEVELOPMENT CO LLC GONYEA PID 0111823220003 DANIEL & JACALYN MILLEA 655 HACKAMORE ROAD NANCY JEAN PID 0211823110024 FOXBERRY FARMS HOMEOWNERS COUNTY ROAD 116 / PINTO DRIVEB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PID 3511923410002 LENNAR DEVELOPMENT TAVERA 1ST BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 125+00 126+00 Cut/Fill Summary Name VOL 2 EG COMBINE vs G-2 Totals Cut Factor 1.00 Fill Factor 1.00 2d Area 7590.02 Sq. Ft. 7590.02 Sq. Ft. Cut 1077.98 Cu. Yd. 1077.98 Cu. Yd. Fill 6.24 Cu. Yd. 6.24 Cu. Yd. 1 5 " 5104 8 10 8 PEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPETE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TETETETETETETE975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 989.6990.6991.5992.4993.3994.2995.0995.6996.2996.4996.4996.3995.9995.4995.0994.7994.5989.43990.43991.43992.43993.43994.43995.40996.14996.62996.85996.81996.52996.00995.46995.04994.78994.69120+00 120+50 121+00 121+50 122+00 122+50 123+00 123+50 124+00 124+50 125+00 125+50 126+00 126+50 127+00 127+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION 2.00% -1.10% PVIS:123+75.00 PVIE:997.93 AD:3.10 K:96.74 300.00' VC BVCS:122+25.00BVCE:994.93EVCS:125+25.00EVCE:996.28HP STA:124+18.48 HP ELEV:996.86 PVIS:119+00.00 PVIE:988.43 AD:1.50 K:80.00 120.00' VC EVCS:119+60.00EVCE:989.63PVIS:127+34.31 PVIE:993.97 AD:1.94 K:154.98 300.00' VC BVCS:125+84.31BVCE:995.62PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE 39' - 15" RCP CL V @ 0.50%INV: 990.50 (NW) 5104STA 122+05.34-36.68 LTRIM=993.83(2'X3')HACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:43:52 AMN MATCHLINE STA: 119+50SEE SHEET 13MATCHLINE STA: 126+50SEE SHEET 15LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)MATCHLINE STA: 126+50SEE SHEET 15S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 14 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS 19800 HACKAMORE ROAD LAKEVIEW DEVELOPMENT CO LLC GONYEA 19710 HACKAMORE ROAD LAKEVIEW DEVELOPMENT CO LLC GONYEA 655 HACKAMORE ROAD NANCY JEAN 625 HACKAMORE ROAD HARRY A & ANGELA S DENNY B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE OHE 127+00 128+00 129+00 130+00 131+00 132+00 133+00 989993992991990989 9 9 0 9 8 9 Fill 6.24 Cu. Yd. 6.24 Cu. Yd. Net 1071.74 Cu. Yd.<Cut> 1071.74 Cu. Yd.<Cut> 5201 520215"15"510515"5106 8 10 TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TETETETETETETETETETETETEPEPEPEPEPEPEPE PEPE 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 995.0994.7994.5994.6994.7995.1995.5996.1996.6997.2997.9998.7999.4999.91000.51001.51001.8995.04994.78994.69994.75994.98995.36995.78996.29996.93997.67998.41999.15999.901000.631001.231001.621001.88127+00 127+50 128+00 128+50 129+00 129+50 130+00 130+50 131+00 131+50 132+00 132+50 133+00 133+50 134+00 134+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION 0.83% 1.48% 0.50% PVIS:133+50.00 PVIE:1001.38 AD:0.98 K:122.14 120.00' VC BVCS:132+90.00BVCE:1000.49EVCS:134+10.00EVCE:1001.68PVIS:127+34.31 PVIE:993.97 AD:1.94 K:154.98 300.00' VC EVCS:128+84.31EVCE:995.22LP STA:127+54.95 LP ELEV:994.68 PVIS:130+00.00 PVIE:996.19 AD:0.65 K:185.24 120.00' VC BVCS:129+40.00BVCE:995.69EVCS:130+60.00EVCE:997.08PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE 5202STA 131+17.7925.10 RTRIM=995.57(48"Ø)46' - 15" RCP CL V @ 0.50% 5201STA 131+05.63-19.60 LTRIM=997.14(2'X3')INV: 992.94 (S) INV: 993.04 (NW)INV: 992.71 (N) INV: 992.71 (S) HACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 WSB PROJECT NO.:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONK:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:44:00 AMN S.A.P. SHEET OF60 15 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RDIMPROVEMENTS PROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITYOF CORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XXMATCHLINE STA: 126+50SEE SHEET 14MATCHLINE STA: 133+50SEE SHEET 16MATCHLINE STA: 133+50SEE SHEET 16LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)6215 HACKAMORE CIRCLE FREDERICK J BENKUSKY 6210 HACKAMORE CIRCLE JOHN G & SHERRY A MORRILL 565 HACKAMORE ROAD RYAN M & APRIL D LINDELL 545 HACKAMORE ROAD TIMOTHY J BEAURPE 435 HACKAMORE ROAD MARILYN A LARSON PID 0111823210008 PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC THE RESERVE OF MEDINAHACKAMORE CIRCLEB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE 134+00 135+00 136+00 137+00 138+00 139+00 140+00 5203 5204 5205 15"15"15" 15" 5206 10 10 TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE TE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 1025 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 1025 1000.51001.51001.81001.91002.21002.41002.61002.91003.21003.31003.91004.11004.61005.21006.41007.51008.51001.231001.621001.881002.131002.381002.631002.881003.131003.381003.631003.881004.351005.131006.131007.131008.131009.13134+00 134+50 135+00 135+50 136+00 136+50 137+00 137+50 138+00 138+50 139+00 139+50 140+00 140+50 141+00 141+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION 0.50% 2.00% PVIS:133+50.00 PVIE:1001.38 AD:0.98 K:122.14 120.00' VC EVCS:134+10.00EVCE:1001.68PVIS:139+00.00 PVIE:1004.13 AD:1.50 K:80.00 120.00' VC BVCS:138+40.00BVCE:1003.83EVCS:139+60.00EVCE:1005.33PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE INV: 999.32 (E) 166' - 15" RCP CL V @ 0.50% INV: 998.49 (W) INV: 998.39 (S) 5204STA 138+92.43-29.68 LTRIM=1003.71(48"Ø)5203STA 137+26.70-29.68 LTRIM=1002.69(2'X3')HACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:44:08 AMN MATCHLINE STA: 133+50SEE SHEET 15MATCHLINE STA: 140+50SEE SHEET 17MATCHLINE STA: 140+50SEE SHEET 17LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 16 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS 6205 HUNTER ROAD JOSEPH & HANNA SMITH 19510 HACKAMORE ROAD OLGA & SERGEY KARACHENETS 435 HACKAMORE ROAD MARILYN A LARSON PID 0111823210008 PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC THE RESERVE OF MEDINA PID 0111823120008 WILD MEADOWS HMOWNRS ASC INCHUNTER ROADB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGTUGTUGT UGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE 141+00 142+00 143+00 144+00 145+00 146+00 147+00 5300 15" 5301 15"10 10 TE TETE990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 1025 1030 1035 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 1025 1030 1035 1006.41007.51008.51009.21009.61010.21010.31010.01009.51008.81007.51005.31003.51001.91000.3998.5996.61007.131008.131009.131010.081010.731011.021010.961010.541009.771008.691007.561006.221004.561002.691000.82998.94997.07141+00 141+50 142+00 142+50 143+00 143+50 144+00 144+50 145+00 145+50 146+00 146+50 147+00 147+50 148+00 148+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION 2.00%-2.25% -3.75% PVIS:143+25.00 PVIE:1012.63 AD:4.25 K:70.59 300.00' VC BVCS:141+75.00BVCE:1009.63EVCS:144+75.00EVCE:1009.25HP STA:143+16.18 HP ELEV:1011.04 PVIS:146+00.00 PVIE:1006.44 AD:1.50 K:80.00 120.00' VC BVCS:145+40.00BVCE:1007.79EVCS:146+60.00EVCE:1004.19PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE HACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:44:15 AMN MATCHLINE STA: 140+50SEE SHEET 16MATCHLINE STA: 147+50SEE SHEET 18MATCHLINE STA: 147+50SEE SHEET 18LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 17 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS RAVINIA 10TH ADDITION PID 0111823120008 WILD MEADOWS HMOWNRS ASC INC PID 0111823120008 WILD MEADOWS HMOWNRS ASC INC RAVINIA 10TH ADDITIONSTEEPLE CHASE LANEBERGAMOTDRIVEB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER10' WIDE EXISTING TRAIL EASEMENT BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE 148+00 149+00 150+00 151+00 152+00 153+00 154+00 5302 5304 5305 15"15"54008 PE PETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETE 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1000.3998.5996.6995.0993.2991.5990.0988.9987.9987.0985.9985.0984.0983.0982.0980.8979.61000.82998.94997.07995.19993.32991.67990.35989.24988.14987.04985.94984.84983.74982.64981.54980.44979.34148+00 148+50 149+00 149+50 150+00 150+50 151+00 151+50 152+00 152+50 153+00 153+50 154+00 154+50 155+00 155+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION -3.75% -2.20% PVIS:150+00.00 PVIE:991.44 AD:1.55 K:77.39 120.00' VC BVCS:149+40.00BVCE:993.69EVCS:150+60.00EVCE:990.12PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE INV: 991.00 (NE) INV: 994.36 (W)39' - 15" RCP CL V @ 2.00% 40' - 15" RCP CL V @ 3.00% 5304STA 148+37.49-68.27 LTRIM=996.94(48"Ø)INV: 990.22 (SW) INV: 984.21 (NE) 5302STA 148+17.69-34.78 LTRIM=997.66(48"Ø)HACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:44:22 AMN MATCHLINE STA: 147+50SEE SHEET 17MATCHLINE STA: 154+50SEE SHEET 19LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)MATCHLINE STA: 154+50SEE SHEET 19S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 18 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS PID 0111823120008 WILD MEADOWS HMOWNRS ASC INC PID 0111823120008 WILD MEADOWS HMOWNRS ASC INC B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 10' WIDE EXISTING TRAIL EASEMENT BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE 155+00 156+00 157+00 158+00 159+00 160+00 161+00 977 976 975 974 973 973OCS 972972 973974 975 975 977976975974973972 5402 5406 1 2 "24" 5401 5403 5413 5415 12" 5405 15"8 PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE TE TE TETETETETETE960 965 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 960 965 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 982.0980.8979.6978.6978.0977.6977.3976.9976.6976.5976.6977.1979.0982.3982.5984.0984.4981.54980.44979.34978.36977.59977.05976.74976.65976.79977.04977.35978.12979.40981.11982.49983.30983.54155+00 155+50 156+00 156+50 157+00 157+50 158+00 158+50 159+00 159+50 160+00 160+50 161+00 161+50 162+00 162+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION -2.20% 0.50% 3.60% PVIS:162+60.27 PVIE:986.90 AD:7.85 K:43.95 345.00' VC BVCS:160+87.77BVCE:980.69HP STA:162+45.98 HP ELEV:983.54 PVIS:157+00.20 PVIE:976.04 AD:2.70 K:111.14 300.00' VC BVCS:155+50.20BVCE:979.34EVCS:158+50.20EVCE:976.79LP STA:157+94.64 LP ELEV:976.65 PVIS:160+00.27 PVIE:977.54 AD:3.10 K:48.39 150.00' VC BVCS:159+25.27BVCE:977.17EVCS:160+75.27EVCE:980.24PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE 5402STA 157+98.16-31.53 LTRIM=975.67(48"Ø)INV: 974.00 (NW) INV: 974.10 (W) 37' - 12" RCP CL V @ 0.54% 66' - 15" RCP CL V @ 0.50% INV: 978.33 (S) 5407STA 161+64.12-36.67 LTRIM=982.06(48"Ø)HACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:44:28 AMN MATCHLINE STA: 154+50SEE SHEET 18MATCHLINE STA: 161+50SEE SHEET 20LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)MATCHLINE STA: 161+50SEE SHEET 20S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 19 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS 19220 HACKAMORE ROAD GREGORY S & JACKIE A HOGLUND 19200 HACKAMORE ROAD HOMELAND INVSTMNTS LLC ETAL PID 0111823110014 WILD MEADOWS HMOWNRS ASC INC B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PREFERRED ALTERNATE TRAIL ALIGNMENT BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT UGT F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE 162+00 163+00 164+00 165+00 166+00 167+00 5407 5408 5412 5411 540915"24"10 5410 PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE TE TE TE TE TE TE TETE TE TETETETETETETE960 965 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 960 965 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 982.5984.0984.4984.0982.8980.7978.5976.7975.2974.0973.1972.9972.8971.7970.7969.6982.49983.30983.54983.21982.31980.84978.84976.85975.28974.14973.43972.96972.90971.82970.72969.63968.53162+00 162+50 163+00 163+50 164+00 164+50 165+00 165+50 166+00 166+50 167+00 167+50 168+00 168+50 169+00 169+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION -4.25% -1.15%2.00%-2.00% -2.19%PVIS:166+96.63PVIE:972.89PVIS:167+23.62PVIE:973.43PVIS:167+53.62PVIE:972.83PVIS:162+60.27 PVIE:986.90 AD:7.85 K:43.95 345.00' VC EVCS:164+32.77EVCE:979.57HP STA:162+45.98 HP ELEV:983.54 PVIS:165+50.27 PVIE:974.58 AD:3.10 K:58.06 180.00' VC BVCS:164+60.27BVCE:978.40EVCS:166+40.27EVCE:973.54PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE 72' - 24" RCP CL V @ 0.15% INV: 968.76 (W) 5412STA 166+38.52-29.67 LTRIM=972.79(2'X3')24' - 15" RCP CL V @ 1.00% INV: 963.49 (S) INV: 963.49 (N) INV: 968.52 (E) 5410STA 166+14.45-29.67 LTRIM=973.81(48"Ø)SUMP: 960.49 HACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:44:34 AMN MATCHLINE STA: 161+50SEE SHEET 19MATCHLINE STA: 167+50SEE SHEET 21LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)MATCHLINE STA: 167+25SEE SHEET 21S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 20 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS 19200 HACKAMORE ROAD HOMELAND INVSTMNTS LLC ETAL PID 0111823110014 WILD MEADOWS HMOWNRS ASC INC COUNTY ROAD 101 / BROCKTON LANEB618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PREFERRED ALTERNATE TRAIL ALIGNMENT BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENT UGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHTOHT F/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OOHE 168+00 169+00 170+00 171+00 172+00 173+00 960 965 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 960 965 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 973.1972.9972.8971.7970.7969.6973.43972.96972.90971.82970.72969.63968.53967.44966.51965.81965.34965.10965.10965.33965.63167+00 167+50 168+00 168+50 169+00 169+50 170+00 170+50 171+00 171+50 172+00 172+50 173+00 173+50 174+00 174+50 PROPOSED CL ELEVATION EXISTING CL ELEVATION PROPOSED CL PROFILE EXISTING CL PROFILE PROPOSED SUBGRADE CL PROFILE HACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:44:41 AMN MATCHLINE STA: 167+25SEE SHEET 20LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 21 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS LAYOUT SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. PLYMOUTH-LED PROJECT EXPECTED FOR CONSTRUCTION IN 2022. BITUMINOUS ROAD AND TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER DES. B618 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER GRADING LIMITS PE APPROX. PERMANENT EASEMENT TE APPROX. TEMPORARY EASEMENTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/O F/OF/OF/OOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEUGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGEUGEUGEUGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGEOHE OHEOHEOHE113+00114+00115+0050115012 5013 51015100 5102 12"12"15"24"PEPEPEPEPETETETEHACKAMORE ROAD SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 K:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 5/13/2021 11:44:46 AMNMATCHLINE STA 113+00SEE SHEET 13 MATCHLINE STA 115+00SEE SHEET 13 LOCATION CITY OF MEDINA CITY OF CORCORAN CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTHFOXBERRY DRCR-116 (PINTO DR)SETTLERS R DSNYDER RDHACKAMORECIRHUNTER RDBERGAMOTDRCR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)HACKAMORE RD HACKA M O R E R D CR-116 (PINTO DR)CR-101 (BROCKTON LN N)S.A.P. XXX-XXX-XXX C.P. XXXX-XX WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTION60 22 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANSTREET & STORM SEWER PLANS K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx Appendix B Typical Sections Hackamore Road Typical Sections 8' Trail 5' Blvd (Min.) 11' Thru Lane 11' Thru Lane 6' Shoulder, Rural Edge 10' Trail 8' Trail 6' Shoulder, Conc. Curb 6' Shoulder, Rural Edge 11' Thru Lane 11' Thru Lane 11' Thru Lane 11' Thru Lane 6' Shoulder, Conc. Curb 6' Shoulder, Conc. Curb 6' Shoulder, Conc. Curb 5' Blvd (Min.) 12' Turn Lane 12' Turn Lane 11' Turn Lane WSB PROJECT NO.: SHEET C.P.OFREVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONK:\015661-000\Cad\Plan\015661-000-C-TYPSECT.dwg 5/13/2021 11:39:55 AM60 4 015661-000 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: AS SHOWN MPM JLS GMD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:JAMES L. STREMEL05/18/202145782HACKAMORE RD IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTCITY OF MEDINA AND CITY OFCORCORANTYPICAL SECTIONS XXXX-XX 11' THRU LANE 11' THRU LANE 6' SHOULDER 6' SHOULDER 46.67' SECTION 11' THRU LANE 12' LEFT TURN LANE OR STRIPED MEDIAN 63.67' SECTION 11' THRU LANE 1 1/2 1' SEE INSET A CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B618 HACKAMORE ROAD (WITH RIGHT AND LEFT TURN LANES) 1 1/2 1' 1:4 M A X . 1:4 M A X. 6" MIN. TOPSOIL AND TURF, AS SPECIFIED RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B618 SEE INSET A HACKAMORE ROAD (STANDARD SECTION) 10" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 OR RECYCLED EQUAL (MNDOT 3138) APPROVED SUBGRADE (12" DEPTH MIN., "SUBGRADE PREPARATION") INSET A 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2.0" TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) (SPNWB330C) 1.5" TYPE SP 12.5 WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) (SPWEB340C) 6" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE OR RECYCLED EQUAL (MNDOT 3138) (INCIDENTAL) 3" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (SPWEA240B) APPROVED SUBGRADE (INCIDENTAL) INSET B 2' SHLDR 8' BIT. TRAIL SEE INSET B BITUMINOUS TRAIL 1:4 MA X . 1:4 M A X . 6' BOULEVARD STA 113+90 - STA 117+00 STA 161+50 - STA 173+00 11' THRU LANE 12' LEFT TURN LANE OR STRIPED MEDIAN 58.67' SECTION 11' THRU LANE 6' SHOULDER 10.67' BIT. TRAIL INCL. CURB BACK 1 1/2 1'SEE INSET A SEE INSET B CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B618 BITUMINOUS TRAIL 1:4 MAX . 1:4 M A X . SEE INSET B STA 98+75 TO 102+00 STA 124+00 TO 135+00 STA 147+60 TO 158+50 HACKAMORE ROAD (LEFT TURN LANE OR CENTER STRIPED MEDIAN) STA 117+00 TO 124+00 (RIGHT TURN LANE FROM STA 122+00 TO 124+00) STA 135+00 TO 147+60 (RIGHT TURN LANE FROM STA 145+60 TO 147+60) STA 158+50 TO 161+50 HACKAMORE ROAD ALTERNATE TRAIL TYPICAL SECTION 6' SHOULDER 6' SHOULDER 2' GRAVEL SHOULDER 1:4 M A X . 1:4 M A X. 6" MIN. TOPSOIL AND TURF, AS SPECIFIED RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS 1:4 M A X . 1:4 M A X. 6" MIN. TOPSOIL AND TURF, AS SPECIFIED RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS 2' GRAVEL SHOULDER 2' GRAVEL SHOULDER 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (NON-WOVEN, MNDOT 3733 TYPE V) OVER 2' SHLDR 8' BIT. TRAIL SEE INSET B BITUMINOUS TRAIL 1:4 MA X . 1:4 M A X . 10' DITCH HACKAMORE ROAD ALTERNATE DITCH SECTION 2.0% 18" SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (MNDOT 3149) 2.5" TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) (SPNWB330C) 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 10.67' BIT. TRAIL INCL. CURB BACK SEE INSET B BITUMINOUS TRAIL 1:4 MAX . 1:4 M A X . SEE INSET B 2.0% 10.67' BIT. TRAIL INCL. CURB BACK SEE INSET B BITUMINOUS TRAIL 1:4 MAX . 1:4 M A X . SEE INSET B 2.0% 11' THRU LANE 11' THRU LANE 6' SHOULDER 6' SHOULDER 48.67' SECTION 1 1/2 1' CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B618 SEE INSET A HACKAMORE ROAD (URBAN SECTION) STA 98+75 TO 113+90* 2.0%2.0% 8' BIT. TRAIL SEE INSET B BITUMINOUS TRAIL 1:4 MA X . 1:4 M A X . SEE INSET B 6' BLVD INCL. CURB BACK 1:4 M A X . 1:4 M A X. *STA 102+00 TO STA 103+75 INCLUDES LEFT TURN LANE *STA 103+75 TO STA 113+90 INCLUDES RIGHT AND LEFT TURN LANE OR STRIPED MEDIAN STA 124+20 TO STA 129+85 STA 147+60 TO STA 158+50 2.0% 11' RIGHT TURN LANE K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx Appendix C Detailed Opinion of Project Costs WSB Project:Hackamore Drive Option 2 Design By:LME Project Location:Medina, MN & Corcoran, MN Checked By:JLS City Project No.: WSB Project No:015661-00 Date:5/12/2021 Item No. MnDOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 156,200.00$ 156,200.00$ 2 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.5 30,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 3 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.5 30,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 4 2104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER L F 138 6.00$ 828.00$ 5 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY S Y 201 12.00$ 2,412.00$ 6 2104.504 REMOVE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY S Y 232 8.00$ 1,856.00$ 7 2104.504 REMOVE SIGN EACH 10 50.00$ 500.00$ 8 2104.504 REMOVE MAILBOX EACH 14 50.00$ 700.00$ 9 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F 454 3.00$ 1,362.00$ 10 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 40771 2.00$ 81,542.00$ 11 2106.507 EMBANKMENT - COMMON C Y 14602 9.00$ 131,418.00$ 12 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 33687 16.00$ 538,992.00$ 13 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 20386 24.00$ 489,264.00$ 14 2106.507 EXCAVATION - MUCK C Y 8590 18.00$ 154,620.00$ 15 2106.507 GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 859 24.00$ 20,616.00$ 16 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 68 300.00$ 20,400.00$ 17 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HOUR 30 175.00$ 5,250.00$ 18 2131.506 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL 9531 2.50$ 23,827.50$ 19 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 5943 30.00$ 178,290.00$ 20 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 20618 3.50$ 72,163.00$ 21 2231.603 BITUMINOUS RAMPING LF 5848 1.25$ 7,310.00$ 22 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 3530 3.00$ 10,590.00$ 23 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 3142 77.00$ 241,934.00$ 24 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 9424 74.00$ 697,376.00$ 25 2502.541 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 5848 16.00$ 93,568.00$ 26 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 17 550.00$ 9,350.00$ 27 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 6141 16.00$ 98,256.00$ 28 2540.602 INSTALL MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 14 75.00$ 1,050.00$ 29 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 30 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 24 300.00$ 7,200.00$ 31 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 216 60.00$ 12,960.00$ 32 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 33 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 22 200.00$ 4,400.00$ 34 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F 3382 2.50$ 8,455.00$ 35 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 6763 2.50$ 16,907.50$ 36 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE ROCK L F 1691 8.00$ 13,528.00$ 37 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 910 28.00$ 25,480.00$ 38 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 S Y 2067 4.00$ 8,268.00$ 39 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 8266 2.00$ 16,532.00$ 40 2575.504 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 3153 9.00$ 28,379.70$ 41 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 188 8.00$ 1,504.00$ 42 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 1.80 4,000.00$ 7,200.00$ 43 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP L F 17684 1.00$ 17,684.00$ 44 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP L F 1000 2.00$ 2,000.00$ 45 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP L F 10073 0.75$ 7,554.75$ 46 2582.518 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP S F 720 8.00$ 5,760.00$ 47 2582.518 PAVT MSSG MULTI COMP S F 585 4.00$ 2,340.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 3,279,327.45$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)327,932.75$ SUBTOTAL 3,607,260.20$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)901,815.05$ TOTAL 4,509,000.00$ WETLAND MITIGATION COST 20,000.00$ OPINION OF PROBABLE COST A. Roadway Costs 48 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 21,100.00$ 21,100.00$ 49 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.3 20,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 50 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.3 15,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 51 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS TRAIL S Y 141.0 5.00$ 705.00$ 52 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F 90 4.00$ 360.00$ 53 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 6634 2.00$ 13,268.00$ 54 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 1106 16.00$ 17,696.00$ 55 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 1156 30.00$ 34,680.00$ 56 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 6333 30.00$ 189,990.00$ 57 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 1350 15.00$ 20,250.00$ 58 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 224 55.00$ 12,320.00$ 59 2540.618 RETAINING WALL S F 425 75.00$ 31,875.00$ 60 2557.603 CHAINLINK SAFETY FENCE L F 170 100.00$ 17,000.00$ 61 2564.601 CROSSWALK SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING L S 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 62 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 827 30.00$ 24,810.00$ 63 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 7515 2.00$ 15,030.00$ 64 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-141 LB 171 8.00$ 1,368.00$ 65 2575.604 SEEDING SPECIAL ACRE 2.1 5,000.00$ 10,500.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 441,452.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)44,145.20$ SUBTOTAL 485,597.20$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)121,399.30$ TOTAL 607,000.00$ 66 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 20,900.00$ 20,900.00$ 67 2104.502 REMOVE STORM SEWER L F 762 10.00$ 7,620.00$ 68 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 3 750.00$ 2,250.00$ 69 2105.601 DEWATERING L S 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 70 2130.610 UTILITY CREW HOUR 10 800.00$ 8,000.00$ 71 2451.607 PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL C Y 851 16.00$ 13,616.00$ 72 2501.502 12" PIPE APRON EACH 2 300.00$ 600.00$ 73 2501.502 15" PIPE APRON EACH 5 350.00$ 1,750.00$ 74 2501.502 24" PIPE APRON EACH 7 500.00$ 3,500.00$ 75 2503.503 12" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 323 68.00$ 21,964.00$ 76 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 2380 72.00$ 171,360.00$ 77 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 29 90.00$ 2,610.00$ 78 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 280 110.00$ 30,800.00$ 79 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH 16 800.00$ 12,800.00$ 80 2506.502 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN H EACH 4 1,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 81 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 126 650.00$ 81,900.00$ 82 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 L F 10 800.00$ 8,000.00$ 83 2506.602 CONST DRAINATE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3')EACH 11 3,000.00$ 33,000.00$ 84 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III C Y 70 120.00$ 8,400.00$ 85 2511.507 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS IV C Y 84 160.00$ 13,440.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 448,510.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)112,127.50$ SUBTOTAL 560,637.50$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)140,159.38$ TOTAL 701,000.00$ C. Storm Sewer Improvements B. Trail Improvements 86 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 17,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 87 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 156 3.00$ 468.00$ 88 2104.603 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F 700 3.00$ 2,100.00$ 89 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y 619 2.00$ 1,238.00$ 90 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 481 16.00$ 7,696.00$ 91 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y 524 24.00$ 12,576.00$ 92 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 C Y 157 30.00$ 4,710.00$ 93 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 23 5.00$ 115.00$ 94 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 53 30.00$ 1,590.00$ 95 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 40 100.00$ 4,000.00$ 96 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON 120 92.00$ 11,040.00$ 97 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 96 16.00$ 1,536.00$ 98 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 450 15.00$ 6,750.00$ 99 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 48 55.00$ 2,640.00$ 100 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 924 1.00$ 924.00$ 101 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 60 4.00$ 240.00$ 102 2565.601 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 425,123.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)42,512.30$ SUBTOTAL 467,635.30$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)116,908.83$ TOTAL 585,000.00$ 103 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 8,800.00$ 8,800.00$ 104 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) - TRAIL S Y 35 30.00$ 1,050.00$ 105 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 170 16.00$ 2,720.00$ 106 2531.504 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 300 15.00$ 4,500.00$ 107 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 32 55.00$ 1,760.00$ 108 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 109 2565.601 SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 175,000.00$ 175,000.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 203,830.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)20,383.00$ SUBTOTAL 224,213.00$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)56,053.25$ TOTAL 280,000.00$ D. Intersection Costs - CR 116 E. Intersection Costs - CR 101 - Half of Signal System Costs Only K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx Appendix D Traffic Analysis, Figures, and Tables 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Project Management Team: Brad Martens, City Administrator, City of Corcoran Kevin Mattson, PE, Public Works Director, City of Corcoran Scott Johnson, City Administrator, City of Medina Dusty Finke, AICP, Planning Director, City of Medina Steve Scherer, Public Works Director, City of Medina Jim Stremel, PE, Project Manager, WSB Lydia Ener, PE, Project Engineer, WSB Heather Nelson, PE, Water Resources Engineer, WSB From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE, Traffic Engineer, WSB Date: April 17, 2020 Re: Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Cities of Medina and Corcoran WSB Project No. 015661-000 In conjunction with the detailed design of the Hackamore Road improvement project (Medina Lake Drive to Brockton Lane) the location of turn lanes at intersections and access locations were analyzed. As part of the analysis, criteria were reviewed to guide the identification of locations where it may be appropriate to construct dedicated right or left turn lanes. There are several sources that can be used to determine the need for turn lanes. Recommendations from guidance documents were reviewed including: • MnDOT Road Design Manual • MnDOT Access Management Manual • MnDOT/LRRB (Local Road Research Board) Research Report 2008-14: Turn Lane Lengths for Various Speed Road and Evaluation of Determining Criteria • NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study The analysis provides for implementing turn lanes in a way to improve the safety of uncontrolled intersection movements by removing the turning traffic from the through lane. Turn lanes should be added to any design where suitable space, right-of-way, and finances are available for construction. The primary input for analyzing the need for turn lanes is the traffic conditions at each specific intersection within the corridor. For the Hackamore Road Improvement project future year traffic conditions were determined by projecting the existing 2020 traffic counts to the year 2040 by including a background traffic growth of 1%/year and estimating the traffic volume from the current adjacent development that is yet to be completed and adjacent future development. The projected 2040 AM and PM peak hour volumes, assuming full development of the area traffic, are shown on the attached figure. The following sections provides a summary of each guidance document indicated above as well as the recommended locations for turn lanes at each intersection in the Hackamore Road corridor. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 2 MnDOT Road Design Manual: The MnDOT Road Design Manual includes the following guidance for the location of turn lanes: • In urban areas, right- and left-turn lanes should be considered whenever construction is economically feasible. • In urban areas, for preservation projects, left-turn lanes should be provided if feasible at nonpublic access locations generating high traffic volumes, at locations where crash locations confirm the existence of a hazard, and at locations determined by the District Traffic Engineer in consideration of crashes, capacity and traffic volumes. • In urban areas, for preservation projects, right-turn lanes should, if feasible, be provided at all public road intersections and other locations as determined by the District Traffic Engineer in consideration of crashes, capacity and traffic volumes. • Continuous left-turn lanes for urban areas have no rigid design criteria – but generally should be considered in the following: when shifting from rural to suburban or urban areas; generally used with lower speeds; volumes should not be excessive for the facility type; center turn lane should generally be 14 feet wide; if the roadway is being reconstructed, realign opposite side driveway entrances if feasible; and pavement markings should be developed by the District Traffic Engineer. • Continuous right-turn lanes may be considered in locations where driveways are closely spaced. They should not be longer than a quarter of a mile and speeds must be greater than 30 miles per hour, with heavier volumes and high turning demands. • In rural areas, right-turn lanes should be considered when the projected ADT is over 1,500, the design speed is 45 miles per hour or higher at all public road access points; if industrial, commercial or substantial trip generating land use is to be served; or if the access serves more than 10 residential units. • In rural areas, left-turn lanes should be provided when the access is to a public road, an industrial tract or a commercial center. • In rural areas, if a left-turn lane is not warranted or if the construction of a left-turn lane is not practical (due to right of way, environmental constraints, etc.), a bypass should be considered. Preferably only at “T” intersections. Four-legged intersections should only consider a bypass lane after all other solutions have been found impractical and the cross-street volume is low. As can be seen from the information above, the MnDOT Road Design Manual is conservative with regard to the construction of dedicated right or left-turn lane construction. Guidance from this document suggests that turn lanes should be constructed at all public streets in rural areas, along with selected locations for commercial, residential and industrial uses. In urban areas they are to be considered whenever feasible. MnDOT Access Management Manual: The MnDOT Access Management Manual is less conservative than the MnDOT Road Design Manual and identifies higher thresholds on the need for dedicated turn lanes. Highlights from the MnDOT Access Management Manual are listed below: Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 3 • Right-turn treatment versus a right-turn lane: the guidelines indicate that a right-turn lane may not be needed if a right-turn treatment can be provided (widening of the shoulder, removing conflicting striping and shoulder rumble strips, prohibiting on street parking in urban areas and/or adding pavement thickness to the shoulder) instead. • Turn lanes should be provided at public street connections and driveways in accordance with the MnDOT Road Design Manual – Section 5-3. • Turn lane warrants for undivided highways: o Warrant 1: Passing lane/climbing lane – at high volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections located on highway segments where passing lanes or climbing lanes are present in the approach direction. o Warrant 2: Limited sight distance/terrain – at all driveways and public street connections with inadequate stopping sight distance or located on short vertical curves or steep grades. o Warrant 3: Railroad crossings – at high volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections where a railroad is parallel to the highway and where the potential exists for vehicles delayed by a train to back up into the through lanes of the highway, creating both safety and operational problems. o Warrant 4: Signalized intersections – at all signalized public street connections and driveways. o Warrant 5: Heavy-vehicle traffic – at all driveways and public street connections high-speed highways (posted speed ≥45 mph) where the heavy- vehicle turning volume is 15 or more vehicles per hour for at least eight hours a day for four months or more per year. o Warrant 6: School entrances – at public and private school driveways on high- speed highways used by school traffic. o Warrant 7: Crash history – at high-volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections that demonstrate a history of crashes of the type suitable to correction by a turn lane or turn-lane treatment, or where adequate trial of other remedies has failed to reduce crash frequency. o Warrant 8: Corridor crash experience – on highway corridors that demonstrate a history of similar crash types suitable to correction by providing corridor -wide consistency in turn-lane use. o Warrant 9: Vehicular volumes – at high-volume driveways (>100 trips per day) and all public street connections on high-speed highways (posted speeds ≥45 mph) that satisfy the following: Highway AADT one year after opening; posted speed of 45 mph or higher 2-Lane Highway (AADT) Cross Street/Driveway (ADT) Turn Lane Requirement > 1,500 >100 Right-turn lane warranted 1,500 – 2,999 >1,500 Left-turn lane warranted 3,000 – 3,999 >1,200 Left-turn lane warranted 4,000 to 4,999 >1,000 Left-turn lane warranted 5,000 to 6,499 >800 Left-turn lane warranted >6,500 101 – 400 Left-turn lane or bypass lane >6,500 >400 Left-turn lane warranted Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 4 Under the warrant analysis outlined in the MnDOT Access Management Manual, right-turn lanes would be recommended at all public street locations as well as private driveways that generate 100 trips or more per day. This is generally consistent with the MnDOT Road Design Manual. However, the construction of left-turn lanes outlined by the MnDOT Access Management Manual would require most side street cross volumes to be significantly higher than they currently are on Hackamore Road in order to construct a dedicated turn lane. This varies from the MnDOT Road Design Manual, which would indicate that in rural areas, left-turn lanes should be provided at all public streets – regardless of volumes – if they are feasible to construct. MnDOT/LRRB (Local Road Research Board) Research Report 2008-14: Turn Lane Lengths for Various Speed Road and Evaluation of Determining Criteria: Although this document discusses more on turn lane lengths , it does outline several criteria for turn lane warrants, including those found in the MnDOT Road Design Manual and the MnDOT Traffic Engineering Manual. The MnDOT Road Design Manual criteria was discussed above. The criteria outlined in the MnDOT 1999 Traffic Engineering Manual provides figures based on the roadway speed limit and design hour volumes. The figures below represent the criteria outlined for left turn lanes with major roadway speed of 40-45mph and for right turn lanes. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 5 Applying this criterion would represent the most conservative approach for implementation of left turn lanes. All left turn movements on Hackamore Road except the following would meet the volume requirements for a dedicated lane: • Maple Lake Drive Westbound • Foxberry Drive Westbound • Future Street east of Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Eastbound • Hackamore Circle Eastbound • Hunter Road/Future Street Eastbound • Steeple Chase Lane/Bergamot Drive Westbound For right turn lanes this criterion is not as conservative as that outline in the MnDOT Road Design Manual or MnDOT Access Management Manual which would recommend a right turn lane at every intersection that has more than 100 trips per day. Applying the above criterion right turn movements would meet the volume requirements for a dedicated lane except at the following Hackamore Road approaches: • Maple Lake Drive Eastbound • Foxberry Drive Eastbound • Hackamore Circle Westbound • Hunter Road/Future Street Eastbound • Steeple Chase Lane/Bergamot Drive Eastbound NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study: Guidance from the NCHRP Report indicate the following should be used to determine when to provide a left turn lane: • A left turn lane should be considered at any median crossover on divided, high speed road. • A left turn lane should be provided on the unstopped approach of a high-speed rural highway when it intersection with other arterial or collectors. • A left turn lane is recommended on the unstopped approach of any intersection when the combination of the intersection volumes intersect above or to the right of the appropriate trend line shown in the associated figures based on speed on the major roadway. The NCHRP Report also develop guidance for the need for right turn lanes based on operating and collision costs compared to the cost of constructing a right turn lane. The figures below show the turn lane criteria for two-lane roadways with a 40mph speed limit. Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 6 The above guidance represents the most stringent criteria for installation of right and left turn lanes. By applying this criteria, the only turn lanes that would be warranted on Hackamore Road is the eastbound left turn and westbound right turn at the Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) intersection. The other movements that meet the warrants are: • Pinto (CSAH 116) Northbound Right • Pinto (CSAH 116) Northbound Left • Pinto (CSAH 116) Southbound Left • Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Northbound Right • Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Northbound Left • Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Southbound Left Hackamore Road Improvement Project – Turn Lane Location Analysis Project Management Team April 17, 2020 Page 7 Turn Lane Recommendations Based on review of each intersection in the Hackamore Road corridor using the above criteria and engineering judgement the following locations for left and right turn lanes should be considered. While these turn lane locations provides for a more conservative recommendation, it will provide for the safest and most efficient roadway system. Maple Lake Drive/Future Street (to north): Eastbound Left turn lane to the Future Street Westbound Right turn lane to the Future Street Foxberry Drive: No Turn Lanes Pinto Drive (CSAH 116): Eastbound Left turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Eastbound Right turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Westbound Left turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Westbound Right turn lane to Pinto Drive (CSAH 116) Northbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Northbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road Future Street (to north): Westbound Right turn lane to Future Street Hackamore Circle: No Turn Lanes Hunter Road/Future Street (to south): Westbound Left turn lane to Hunter Road Westbound Right turn lane to Hunter Road Steeple Chase Lane/Bergamot Drive: Eastbound Left turn lane to Steeple Chase Lane Westbound Right turn lane to Steeple Chase Lane Church Entrance (to north): Eastbound Left turn lane to Church Entrance Westbound Right turn lane to Church Entrance Brockton Lane (CSAH 101): Eastbound Left turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Eastbound Right turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Westbound Left turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Westbound Right turn lane to Brockton Lane (CSAH 101) Northbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Northbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Left turn lane to Hackamore Road Southbound Right turn lane to Hackamore Road 2040 Traffic Volumes LEGEND XX(XX) AM(PM) Forecast Peak Hour Movements 248 Assumed Build Lane Configuration Traffic Signal Traffic Sign Hackamore Rd Brockon LnPinto DrHunter RdBergamot DrMedina Lake DrFoxberry DrFuture Access West18 (10)0 (0)24 (15)21 (56) p s 8 (25) j (19) 6 2 (11) x 0 m (1) 0(0) 0(9) 10(66) 94 (0) 0 d 31 (95) 1 (6) - m (0) 0(4) 18(93) 125 (0) 0 Future Access East5 (5)0 (0)27 (9)p (16) 8 10 (22)k s f 12 (30) x 0 144 (213) (9) 4 m (10) 12(0) 0(16) 26(188) 219 0 (1)43 (33)25 (37)k 0 (4)13 (4)x 4 104 (227) p s f (15) 11 m (1) 1(4) 0(1) 4(205) 245 (2) 2 74 (155) i r w s 170 (145)41 (29)570 (257)122 (41)k 26 (82) f x 2 4 8(44) 32 v (81) 29(598) 163(183) 198(154) 212 ,(36) 61 Hackamore Road Traffic Analysis Medina and Corcoran, MN (42) 77 ,(25) 45 (29) 23 v (35) 2(691) 117(137) 6889 (59) x 2 7 18 (47) 29 (70) f k 68 (41)w s11 (20)592 (161)u (13) 10 v(207) 203 x 16 (26)22 (16)k f 151 (202)10 (8)[ 2020 Traffic Volumes Hackamore Road Traffic Analysis Medina and Corcoran, MN LEGEND XX(XX) AM(PM) Existing Peak Hour Movements 248 Lane Configuration Traffic Signal Traffic Sign Hackamore Rd Brockon LnPinto DrHunter RdBergamot DrMedina Lake DrFoxberry Drm (1) 0(7) 8(54) 77 (0) 0 2 (9) - d 17 (46) m (0) 0(3) 15(64) 83 (0) 0 1 (5) - d 19 (57) (7) 3 c(112) 143 j 85 (127) 8 (18)4 (4)22 (7)[ (6) 5 /(1) 1(3) 0(1) 3(133) 147 (2) 2 4 57 (125) p d 14 (18)k 0 (3)0 (1)23 (17)4 (0)(27) 13 /(42) 12(490) 134(150) 162(106) 143 (14) 28 2 4 8 44 (93) i r w 139 (119)27 (10)467 (211)100 (34)21 (67) ;8 (14)485 (132)u 48 (21)w 10 (24) 14 (51) ; (22) 17 ?(25) 1(566) 96(94) 4458 (37) 2 7 (25) 48 (19) 34 2040 Traffic Volumes LEGEND XX(XX) AM(PM) Forecast Peak Hour Movements 248 Assumed Build Lane Configuration Traffic Signal Traffic Sign Hackamore Rd Brockon LnPinto DrHunter RdBergamot DrMedina Lake DrFoxberry DrFuture Access West18 (10)0 (0)24 (15)21 (56) p s 8 (25) j (19) 6 2 (11) x 0 m (1) 0(0) 0(9) 10(66) 94 (0) 0 d 31 (95) 1 (6) - m (0) 0(4) 18(93) 125 (0) 0 Future Access East5 (5)0 (0)27 (9)p (16) 8 10 (22)k s f 12 (30) x 0 144 (213) (9) 4 m (10) 12(0) 0(16) 26(188) 219 0 (1)43 (33)25 (37)k 0 (4)13 (4)x 4 104 (227) p s f (15) 11 m (1) 1(4) 0(1) 4(205) 245 (2) 2 74 (155) i r w s 170 (145)41 (29)570 (257)122 (41)k 26 (82) f x 2 4 8(44) 32 v (81) 29(598) 163(183) 198(154) 212 ,(36) 61 Hackamore Road Traffic Analysis Medina and Corcoran, MN (42) 77 ,(25) 45 (29) 23 v (35) 2(691) 117(137) 6889 (59) x 2 7 18 (47) 29 (70) f k 68 (41)w s11 (20)592 (161)u (13) 10 v(207) 203 x 16 (26)22 (16)k f 151 (202)10 (8)[ Control Intersection Existing 2020 Projected 2040 without Improvements Projected 2040 with Improvements AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Medina Lake Dr / Future Access A (A) 1 (2) A (A) 1 (2) A (A) 3 (9) A (B) 3 (11) A (A) 2 (7) A (A) 3 (8) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Foxberry Dr A (A) 1 (3) A (A) 1 (4) A (A) 1 (4) A (A) 2 (5) A (A) 1 (3) A (A) 2 (4) Signal Hackamore Rd at Pinto Dr (CSAH 116) A (B) 6 (13) A (B) 9 (17) C (D) 21 (38) C (D) 23 (44) B (C) 10 (21) B (C) 15 (27) Thru- Stop Hackamore Rd at Future Access NA NA NA NA A (A) 3 (7) A (A) 4 (8) A (A) 2 (6) A (A) 3 (6) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Hunter Rd / Future Access A (A) 1 (4) A (A) 1 (4) A (A) 4 (8) A (A) 4 (9) A (A) 2 (7) A (A) 2 (8) Thru- Stop Hackamore Rd at Bergamot Dr / Steeple Chase Ln A (A) 1 (5) A (A) 2 (7) A (A) 3 (9) A (A) 4 (9) A (A) 2 (6) A (A) 2 (7) Thru-Stop Hackamore Rd at Future Access (Church) NA NA NA NA A (A) 3 (7) A (A) 2 (6) A (A) 2 (5) A (A) 1 (4) Signal Hackamore Rd at Brockton Ln (CSAH 101) B (C 11 (22) B (C) 12 (21) C (E) 29 (56) C (D) 25 (47) B (C) 17 (28) B (C) 16 (26) Hackamore Road - Level of Service and Delay Summary X (X) – Overall LOS or Delay (Worst Movement LOS or Delay) K:\015661-000\Admin\Docs\75% Design Memos\1. 75% Hackamore Design Memo - Medina - Final Draft 051321.docx Appendix E Drainage Map """"""""""""""""""" !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( ")")")")") ")") ")") ")")")") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ")") ")")")") ")") ")") ")")") ")")")")") ") ") ")")")")")")")")")")")") ")")")")") ") ") ")") ")") ") ")")") ")") ") ")") #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*"#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*""""""""")")")")")") ")")") ")") ")")")")")") !(") ")")#*#* #*!( #* !(#*")")")") ")")")")") #*96095495295098697096 4 1 0 0 6988998 988 101899098610009 8 2 1016 1010996 994 992 1006 1002 1 0 2 2 1 0 1 8 10109989901016 1012992 994 988 10069901 0 2 21016 10029981000 990 988 9 9 2 9 8 6 1008 99 8 990 10049949929881 0 0 2 994 986 984 1004998 988 982 978 968 958956 996 990 992986974 972 10049981008 10009989 9 4 98498 2 980996986986984 994 988 988 984 9949929869829889809849769729701022 10181000998990986 972 96210201 0 1 810201014 996990994 986 970966100810061002998 994990990 988 988986984 980 980978 956954 1022 1018 1014 101010041002 1008 1002 99 4992 9949929949909889869889869809749 7 8 972 97297010081006986 9 8 4 986984 976 972 1022102010201018998 996996 994990988 988986986 984 986 984 9869849849829849829849829 8 2 9809 6 8966 948946998 9589561014996994 984 10121000 988 10 2 0 10041016 1 0 0 6 1002996996 976974966984982980 1006 1002100 4 996 99 4 98 6 984978 1014 1008 1006 1004970 101 61018 1016998 994988992 99010121006 1004998996994 992 994 990988992 990 990968 964 962952102010121010100 899810 0 2 99 6 99 4 9 9 2 99 4 992 992 990990990990988992988 986986 964 9561024 1020102010181022 1012 1008 100 6 1 0 1 0 1008 1 0 0 610041004 100410021000 998996998 996 996 992992 992992 994 992992 9909909 9 0 988 98898899098 6 988 986 988 984986 986 986982 982 976 974970 97497096095010281026 10221022 10241018 101610141014 1012 1012 1010 1008 1008 1006 1002 1002100210021004 1000 10009981000 996 996996996 998 998994 99 4 994996992 994994 994992 990 992992992 992990 988 990988 986 986 986 986986 986 986986 9 8 8 98 8 988 984 98 4 984984984 984 984984984 984 98 6 986 986 98 6 9 8 4 984 982 982 982 9829 8 2 982 984 98 0 982 9 8 0 976 972 974 972 968 968 966 96496496 0 948 980 63rd Place North LiliumTrail AsterRoadFoxberryCirc le CarriageWayElderberry Court LarkspurLaneBluestemLaneBr id lePathLupineL ane Pr ai r ie Sage L a n e 63rdAvenueNorth PoppyDriveAlvaradoLaneNorthMapleLeafCour t AlvaradoLaneNorthDaisyCircleDaisyCircleHackamore Road ElmRidgeCircleHackamoreCircleSteeple Ch aseL a n e SettlersCourtGol denrodTrail ShorewoodTrailAlvaradoLaneNorthMedinaLakeDri veCalamusCircle62nd Place NorthValleyViewRoad SettlersRoad 64th Avenue North GleasonParkway HunterRoadHeatherDriveLa rk spurC o urt62ndAvenue NorthParkTrailRoad County Road 116Woo dl andHi l lCo urt Pad d ock Lane County Road 47 Fo xberryDri v eHunt erLane Cal amusCircleCounty Road 101PrimroseLaneElmStreet Brockton Lane NorthBergamot Dr iv e Existing Wild Meadows Development Existing Ravinia 10th Addition DevelopmentFuture Development Future Development Proposed Reserve at Medina (Pulte Homes of Minnesota) Development Proposed Tavera 1st (Lennar) Development Document Path: K:\015661-000\GIS\Maps\015661-000 Hackamore Rd Storm Sewer Design\Categorized Drainage Map Date Saved: 5/12/2021¯1 inch = 500 feet 0 500 FeetHackamore Road Reconstruction Project City of Medina, MN; City of Corcoran, MN Categorized Drainage Map Preliminary BMP Grading Proposed Storm Sewer Proposed Development Storm Sewer Stub Existing Storm Sewer Existing Culverts Wetland Delineation Parcels Flood Zone 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD A #*High Point #*Low Point Treated Impervious and Associated Drainage Area Hackamore Circle BMP East BMP Reserves at Medina (Pulte) Development Tavera 1st (Lennar) Development Future Development Future Development Untreated Existing Untreated Proposed CORCORAN MEDINA $ East Discharge Point$North Discharge Point $South Discharge Point $$$ $ $ $Future Development STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10a. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson Topic: Public Works Building Improvement – 9525 Cain Road Action Required: Approval Summary: The City of Corcoran owns property located at 9525 Cain Road which was the site of the old Public Works building. Presently, only the garage structure remains on site and is used year-round for off-site storage of city equipment and other items. The existing building is estimated to be nearly 60 years old and still has the original tin siding and roof albeit in rough shape (see Attachment 1). The structure’s roof was impacted by hail damage and is planned for replacement through insurance coverage at an estimated value of $47,000. Staff recognized an opportunity to realize cost savings by replacing the remaining outside shell of the building including the siding, windows, and doors. Quotes were reviewed and approved for the roof replacement by the insurance agency with Ebert Construction the low bidder. The additional cost to complete the siding replacement is $34,500. Storage availability for the city’s equipment is already nearing full capacity and future demand is projected to only increase. Additionally, the price of material goods is skyrocketing and supplier’s have indicated a 30% price increase if we delay further. Financial/Budget: This is an unbudgeted item. Funding would come from the long-range planning fund. Options: 1. Approve the quote from Ebert Construction in the amount of $34,500. 2. Send back to staff for further review. 3. Decline. Recommendation Approve the quote from Ebert Construction in the amount of $34,500. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve the quote from Ebert Construction in the amount of $34,500. Attachments: 1. 9525 Cain Road - Photo 2. Quote – Ebert Construction STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10b. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Natalie Davis Topic: Construction Hours Discussion Action Required: Direction Summary: The City of Corcoran currently allows construction activities to occur between the hours of 7AM – 10PM, Monday through Friday, with the hours reduced to 9AM – 9PM on weekends and holidays. The City Council requested an opportunity to discuss construction hours and potentially amending them due to input from the residents. After completing an initial review of 12 cities within Hennepin County, the predominate trend is to allow construction hours 7 days a week, typically between 7AM – 10PM. The benefit of this approach is that construction projects are provided with flexibility to complete construction projects as soon as possible while still allowing for peaceful nighttime hours. Contractors can make up time lost during the week due to adverse weather conditions and/or complete time sensitive projects. This approach also allows for ease of enforcement and compliance as there is only one set of hours that apply daily to everyone, and the Police Department is not tasked with determining what qualifies as an allowed or exempt construction activity. The downside is long-term construction projects that regularly work weekend and holiday hours can disrupt nearby neighbors. It is also typical for cities to restrict weekend hours, similar to what is already established in Corcoran, while still allowing construction to occur daily. Notably, the City of Dayton only allows weekend and holiday construction activities between 8AM – 4PM. These restricted weekend hours allow for a compromise between the flexibility needs of contractors while providing additional weekend relief to impacted residents. It is important to note that construction workers prefer earlier hours to minimize heat exhaustion, particularly in the summer. The City of Dayton originally had weekend hours set at 9AM – 5PM, but this was later changed to 8AM – 4PM to accommodate this need. Of the 12 cities evaluated, three cities do not allow construction on Sundays with some exemptions: Eden Prairie, Bloomington, and Edina. Eden Prairie does not allow any type of construction activity on Sundays or holidays unless approved by the City Manager when good cause is established. Construction activities are permitted from 7AM to 7PM Monday through Saturday. The benefit to these hours is that construction teams still have full hours on Saturday to make-up for unfavorable weather conditions and complete time sensitive projects with a n early start time allowed. Residents have complete relief from the sound of construction activities one day a week. Additionally, the City Manager can approve Sunday hours when there is a justified need. This is also relatively easy to enforce as there is one set of hours applied Monday through Saturday with a prohibition of construction activities on Sundays applied to all activities, unless otherwise pre-approved. One major downside to this approach to consider is the potential impact to homeowners completing their own project. They may only have the availability to complete construction activities on the weekends, and their project could take twice as long under this approach (unless they can establish “good cause” for an approved variation from typical hours). This approach may also mean that long-term projects will require more time to complete. Contractors typically only plan three to four days in advance, so it may be very difficult for them to receive an administrative approval for additional hours when it becomes clear they need to make such a request. It may become difficult for homeowners to have contractor’s complete emergency work. Additionally, there may be some complications with enforcement as residents may call the Police Department on projects that are granted variations to Sunday hours. Bloomington prohibits most construction on Sundays with exemptions within industrial, business, and commercial zoning districts. The added benefit to this approach is that construction activities within residential districts have a blanket prohibition on Sunday which is relatively easy to enforce while providing relief to residents. The downsides to this approach are similar to the downsides discussed for Eden Prairie, specifically that long-term projects may take longer to complete, homeowners are prohibited from completing their own small projects on Sundays, and this may impact the ability for contractors to complete emergency repairs or time sensitive projects. Edina approves weekend and holiday construction hours based on the value of the project. This is handled as part of the building permit. Construction activities for projects approved as a Class 1 permit (small projects valued less than $25,000) are allowed between the hours of 9AM – 5PM on weekends and holidays. Class 2 permits (projects valued at or more than $25,000) can conduct construction between 9AM – 6PM on Saturdays with no allowed construction on Sundays or holidays. The added benefit to this approach is that small projects can continue work over the weekends while impacted residents are granted relief from larger construction projects on Sundays and holidays. On the other hand, this comes with similar downsides as previously noted for Eden Prairie and Bloomington. Additionally, the enforcement for this type of ordinance becomes quite complicated. The City of Edina addressed this complication by dedicating staff specifically for the enforcement of construction hours. Financial/Budget: Continuing under the current ordinance or providing a weekend restriction for all construction activities is not anticipated to impact the current budget. The budget may be impacted if some construction activities are exempt from weekend restrictions by right or by permit as this would require additional staff time and/or staffing to follow through with enforcement. Options: 1. Keep weekend construction hours set at 9AM – 9PM on weekends and holidays. 2. Direct staff to develop ordinance language to further reduce construction hours on weekends and/or holidays (e.g., 8AM – 4PM). 3. Direct staff to develop ordinance language to prohibit specific construction activities on Sundays and/or holidays. 4. Direct staff to develop ordinance language to prohibit all construction activities on Sundays and/or holidays. Recommendation: Staff recommends continuing to allow construction activities 7 days a week with either the same or reduced weekend hours applicable to all construction activities. Additionally, staff recommends continuing with administrative approval of additional flexibility to construction hours based on need. Council Action: Direct staff on how to proceed with a potential ordinance change to weekend construction hours. Attachments: 1. Construction Hours Comparison Table of 12 Hennepin County Cities City Construction hours Weekend Differations Other Notes Plymouth 5AM - 11PM None Hanover 7AM - 10PM None Loretto 7AM - 10PM 8AM - 9PM on weekends and holidays St. Louis Park 7AM - 10PM 9AM - 10PM on weekends and holidays Golden Valley 7AM - 10PM None Does not apply to City public improvements, emergency repairs, or snow removal Minnetonka 7AM - 10PM None Eden Prairie 7AM - 7PM Not allowed on Sundays or holidays City Manager can approve variations to hours if good cause is established Bloomington 7AM - 10PM 9AM - 9PM on Saturdays; Not allowed on Sundays Construction in industrial, business, and commerical zoning districtions is exempt from Sunday prohibition. Dayton 7AM - 7PM 8AM - 4PM on weekends and holidays City may impose additional hour restrictions in conjuction with a land use permit Edina 7AM - 7PM Class 1 permits: 9AM - 5PM weekends and holidays Class 2 permits: 9 AM - 6PM Saturdays with no allowed construction on Sundays or holidays Building permits issued in two classes. Class 1: for small projects valued at less than $25K Class 2: Projects valued at $25K or more Maple Grove 7AM - 9PM 8AM - 9PM on weekends and holidays Osseo 7AM - 10PM None STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10c. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Director Matt Gottschalk Topic: Sergeant and K9 Handler Appointment Process Action Required: Authorization Summary: The City staffing plan and budgets include the addition of one Sergeant in January of 2021 and one Sergeant in January of 2022, with both positions resulting the addition of a staff person. The details and logic for this plan was outlined in the October 22, 2020 Council meeting and other previous staff reports. In October of 2020, the Council authorized staff to hold a process for the first Sergeant position. From that process Officer Peter Ekenberg was promoted to Sergeant. Council gave authorization to backfill the vacant patrol officer position. In addition to the patrol officer vacancy created from that process, the department had two other patrol officer vacancies due to medical retirements. These vacancies have left significant patrol coverage gaps that the department has had to meet with part-time officers and mandatory overtime. Additionally, many of the shift overlaps during peak times were forced to be eliminated. In order to attempt to fill these three Patrol Officer positions, the City held a Police Officer hiring process. Two candidates were selected from the process. Officer Clay Decker was authorized as a full-time employee in March of 2020 and Josh Lawson will start full-time employment on May 24th, 2021. Staff elected to begin a new process for the third Police Officer vacancy. Due to the lengthy process for hiring Police Officers, staff anticipates that the third new Police Officer will not start until August of this year. With the delayed start of Josh Lawson and the backfilled patrol position (both were budgeted for all of 2020) the City has incurred significant savings. The department also has an upcoming K9 officer (lateral assignment) opportunity available. With all of the moving pieces and incurred savings, staff is requesting authorization to begin the recruitment process for the City’s second Sergeant. If an experienced external candidate is selected, they likely would not start until August of this year. With the number of new officers starting, the added nighttime supervision of the additional Sergeant continues to become increasingly more important. These changes could be accomplished while still realizing savings from the position vacancies at the beginning of 2021. This strategy would also allow the Police Department to work on getting out in front of the staffing shortages that have plagued the department for the past two years. Staff Report—May 27, 2021 Council Meeting Prepared by Director Gottschalk Page 2 Staff is seeking authorization to begin the recruitment process for the City’s second Sergeant position. Staff is also requesting authorization to hold a K9 Handler selection process in early June and authorization for the Director of Public Safety to appoint the preferred candidate. This would allow the selected handler time to bond with Zeke prior to starting class in August. Financial/Budget: Due to multiple full-time vacancies, the City would still realize an overall net savings in 2021 even with the referenced second Sergeant appointment. The K9 Handler position was already budgeted for all of 2021. Options: 1. Authorize the Police Department to begin the recruitment and hiring process for the Police Sergeant position. Additionally, authorize the Director of Public Safety to hold a K9 Handler selection process and appoint the preferred candidate to the K9 Handler position. 2. Provide staff with other direction. Recommendation: Authorize the Police Department to begin the recruitment and hiring process for the Police Sergeant position. Additionally, authorize the Director of Public Safety to hold a K9 Handler selection process and appoint the preferred candidate to the K9 Handler position. Council Action: Consider a motion to authorize the Police Department to begin the recruitment and hiring process for the Police Sergeant position. Additionally, authorize the Director of Public Safety to hold a K9 Handler selection process and appoint the preferred candidate to the K9 Handler position. Attachments: None STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10d. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: City Meeting Format Action Required: Direction Summary: An executive order from the Governor has ended the mask mandate, additionally, capacity, and distancing limits end effective May 28, 2021. While the City continues to operate under an emergency order allowing for electronic meetings to continue, staff would like direction from the Council on whether in-person meetings should now take place for the City Council, Planning Commission, Parks and Trails Commission, and Charter Commission. Once in-person meetings take place, voting will no longer be allowed from a virtual setting, other than as allowed for medical exceptions outlined by law. Should the City Council direct staff to coordinate in-person meetings, those meetings must also be open to the public to attend in person. An attendance option could be included to allow for virtual attendance for members of the public in addition to the in - person attendance option. The City Council should direct staff on whether a hybrid meeting style, including virtual public attendance should be allowed. If the Council desires to proceed with a hybrid meeting format, staff recommends initiating a sign-up requirement for individuals desiring to speak on items virtually. This would allow for individuals to continue to speak on items as they wish, while eliminating the cumbersome existing public comment opportunity at each agenda section. In- person attendees would fill out the public comment card already established prior to the pandemic. Financial/Budget: Technology updates allowing for virtual attendance were completed as part of the CARES Act investments. No additional costs are required to change the meeting format. Options: 1. Continue virtual meetings until the executive order is eliminated. 2. Commence in-person meetings effective June 10, 2021. 3. Commence in-person meetings effective June 10, 2021 and allow a virtual attendance option for members of the public. Recommendation: Staff recommends option number three above, commencing with in-person meetings and continuing with a virtual option for the public. This allows for the maximum amount of participation in City meetings. Additionally, staff recommends utilizing a sign-up system for individuals desiring to speak on agenda items. Page 2 Council Action: Provide direction to staff on future meeting format for the City Council, Planning Commission, Parks and Trails Commission, and Charter Commission. Attachments: None. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10e. Council Meeting: May 27, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: City Council Terms and Office Requirements Action Required: Direction Summary: The City Council requested staff review options regarding establishment of term limits and prohibition of serving multiple roles for the City. The City Attorney was asked to provide information on these items and a memo to that effect is attached to this report. It is requested that the City Council provide direction to staff on any action to take on these topics. Financial/Budget: Minimal costs would be incurred to proceed forward with discussions. Options: 1. Take no action. 2. Direct staff to draft an amendment to commission ordinances. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council take no action. The City Council appoints members to the Planning Commission and Parks and Trails Commission and can choose to not allow an individual in another role. The process to amend the Charter ordinance is significant and staff does not believe a conflict currently exists. Council Action: Provide direction to staff on potential amendments to ordinances. Attachments: 1. Memo from City Attorney -1- M E M O R A N D U M TO: Brad Martens, City Administrator FROM: John Thames, City Attorney DATE: April 16, 2021 RE: Establishment of term limits and conflict protocols ======================================================= At the direction of the City Council, you asked that I provide guidance as to what authority the Council has to establish term limits for Council or commission members and what options the Council has to establish rules addressing the potential conflicts related to occupying multiple positions with the City. Further, you requested suggested courses of action for implementation. I will address these each in turn. Term Limits The Council may establish or alter term limits for positions which it appoints on the Planning Commission and the Parks and Trails Commission. This can be accomplished via a code amendment to Chapters 34 and 36 respectively. The City Council is without authority to place term limits on Charter Commission appointments and the district court is empowered by MN Stat 410.05 to “appoint new or reappoint existing commission members” without limitation. Further, the City Council and the Charter Commission may not place term limits on Council seats. This action was determined to be unconstitutional by the Minnesota Supreme Court in 1995, and the Court found that such action contradicted the Minnesota Constitution’s establishment of universal eligibility for public office. Conflicts/Prohibition on Occupation of Multiple Roles The City Council may amend Chapter 30 of the City Code and impose specific restrictions on eligibility for Councilmembers to sit on the Planning Commission or the Parks and Trails Commission. Current code implies this prohibition, as both boards contemplate a non-voting Council liaison position. This exists largely due to the advisory role of both boards. To prohibit a Councilmember from holding a position on the Charter Commission, a Charter amendment is required. MN Stat 410.05 states: “Except as otherwise provided in the charter, no person shall be disqualified from serving on a charter commission by reason of holding any other elective or appointive officer other than judicial”. That process is outlined below. Pursuant to MN Stat 410.191, no Councilmember may hold full-time employment with the City. State law permits some part-time employment with the City, however, conflicts can arise depending on the nature of the employment. The City Charter currently prohibits any Councilmember from holding any other paid employment with the City. If the City desires to -2- prohibit a sitting Councilmember from holding any employment with the City (paid or unpaid), this could be accomplished via a Council initiated ordinance amendment of Chapter 30 or, more appropriately, via a Charter amendment. Amending the Charter to accomplish this goal is most appropriate for clarity because making the change to the City code without the Charter amendment results in the creation of differing standards in the Charter and Code. In such event, the Code standard would be more restrictive but not contradictory to the Charter provision and therefore permissible. However, the differing standards may cause confusion and ultimately could be overruled by a subsequent contradictory Charter amendment (in such event the Charter provision would control). Additionally, because conflicts of interest are currently addressed in the Charter, it would be a logical and appropriate location to dictate the desired conflict standard. If such a restriction is desired, the Council should also determine how it will be applied to currently sitting Councilmembers (e.g. Are they immediately applicable upon passage and publication, or applicable within a certain number of days after passage and publication, or upon the end of the current term?) In order to amend the Charter to restrict Councilmembers from sitting on the Charter Commission or to specify a different conflict of interest standard, several different paths can be followed. All such paths, with the exception of one, require voter approval via a referendum. (They can be initiated by citizen petition, the Charter Commission, or the City Council.) To make an amendment without a referendum, the Charter commission must recommend that the City Council amend the Charter by ordinance. The Council’s obligation thereafter is to publish a notice of a public hearing within one month of receipt of that recommendation from the Charter Commission. A public hearing must then be held at least 2 weeks but not more than 1 month after the notice is published. Within 1 month of that public hearing, the Council must thereafter vote on the proposed Charter amendment. The Council approval must be unanimous. If the Council unanimously approves the amendment, the ordinance must be published and would take effect 90 days after that passage and publication (or later if so specified by the Council). While this process does not require a referendum, if a sufficient number of voters timely petition for one, a referendum becomes necessary. Specifically, a number of voters equaling 2% of the total votes cast in the last state general election would have to sign a petition making this demand within 60 days of the passage and publication of the ordinance designating the amendment. (State law requires 5% of the registered voters in the City for this referendum demand, but the City Charter sets forth a lower threshold.) Because Corcoran has a population of less than 10,000, Minnesota state law permits the Council to propose a Charter amendment via ordinance, without submission to the Charter Commission. Pursuant to state law, this requires 4/5 support from the Council, two weeks’ published notice prior to the Council vote, and voter approval. However, Chapter 7 of the City Charter contemplates that any Charter amendment proposed by the City Council be submitted to the Charter Commission, prior to voter submission. Please reach out with any additional questions that you or the Council have. Respectfully Submitted. Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 MEMORANDUM 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net DATE May 20, 2021 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications Projects/Comments in blue italics are new The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1.Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan for Cook Lake Highlands (PID 25-119-23- 14-0003) (city file no. 20-047). Trek Development has requested approval for a mixed use development with a senior co-op, market rate apartment, villa homes, day care and memory care. This item was reviewed at the Parks and Trails Commission on February 18th and a public hearing was held at the March 4th Planning Commission meeting. The applicant submitted a revised application on March 15th. The revised plan was reviewed at the Planning Commission on April 1st, Parks and Trail Commission on April 15th and the City Council voted unanimously to deny the request on April 22nd. Applications that have been denied cannot be resubmitted to the City for six months. The applicant has submitted a written request for the Council to allow submittal of a new application sooner than allowed by the City Code. 2.Conditional Use Permit, Variance and Site Plan for a new NAPA at 19905 75th Avenue (PID 26- 119-23-11-0040) (city file no. 21-004). Kinghorn Construction, on behalf of REH Auto LLC., has requested approval of a conditional use permit, variance and site plan for a new 16,400 sq. ft. building. The item was reviewed at a public hearing on at the Planning Commission on April 1st and is scheduled for City Council action on May 27th. 3.Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan for the Property located at 23240 County Road 30 (PID 07- 119-23-13-0003) (city file no. 21-007). Trevor Scherber has requested approval of a conditional use permit and site plan approval to operate a business at 23240 County Road 30. The application was reviewed at a public hearing at the Planning Commission on May 6th and is scheduled for City Council review on May 27th. 4.KMM Land Development, LLC request for Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance at 23405 CR 10 (PID 18-119-23-12-0001) (city file 21-012). The applicant is requesting approval to allow a new office with storage yard for their construction company. This request is similar to the ComLink operation that was approved on this site but never built. The application was reviewed at a public hearing at the May 6th Planning Commission meeting and action is expected at the May 27th City Council meeting. 5.Request from Westside Tire for a Zoning Ordinance text amendment (city file 21-015). The applicant is requesting approval of a text amendment to allow outside storage and parking as a principal use in the I-1 zoning district. If approved, the change would apply to all property in the I-1 zoning district. Staff is reviewing the application for completeness. If complete, the application will be scheduled for the June 3rd Planning Commission and action at the June 24th City Council meeting. Agenda Item 11a. MEMORANDUM 2 6. Request for Rezoning, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance for Garages Too, LLC at 224010 Highway 55 (PID 32-119-23-44-0001) (city file 21-016). The applicant has requested approval to allow a mini storage/self-storage facility on the property. The City Council reviewed a concept plan earlier this year and indicated support. The application is currently incomplete and will be scheduled for a Public Hearing at the Planning Commission and Council action after it is deemed complete. 7. Request for Rezoning, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Preliminary Plat for “Amberley” and “Bellwether” from Pulte Homes (PID 01-119-23-34-002 and 01-119-23-43-0002) (City file 21- 017). Pulte has submitted a request for approval to allow 192 new homes. The Council reviewed a concept plan earlier this year and indicated support. Staff is working with the applicant to resolve infrastructure questions. This item has been scheduled for Parks and Trails Commission review on May 20th and will be scheduled for Planning Commission and City Council review in July or August. 8. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building Sidewall Height at 6805 Rolling Hills Road (PID 32-119-23-11-0002) (city file 21-018). The applicant is requesting approval to exceed the sidewall height on a new accessory building in the rear yard. This item has been scheduled for a public hearing at the June 3rd Planning Commission meeting and Council action on June 24th. 9. Agriculture Preserve Designation (PID 19-119-23-41-0002, 29-119-23-12-0006 and 30-119-23-11- 0001) (city file 21-019). Patnodes have requested enrollment or re-enrollment in the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserve Program for three parcels. This is scheduled for City Council on May 27th. 10. City Initiated Ordinance Amendments (city file 21-020). Staff is recommending four changes to the land use map for consistency with the adopted plan and minor edits to Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance. This item has been scheduled for a public hearing at the July 1st Planning Commission and Council action on July 22nd. If approved, the land use map edits will be send to the Metropolitan Council for review. 11. Franzen Estates Final Plat at 23020 Strehler Road (PID 17-119-23-32-0003) (city file 21-021). Greg and Deb Franzen have submitted a final plat application for the three lot subdivision. The preliminary plat was approved earlier this year. The application is currently incomplete. When deemed complete staff will schedule for the next City Council meeting. 12. Request for Vacation of Cain Road (city file 21-022). Michael Galbraith submitted a request for the City Council to commence a vacation of the unimproved portion of Cain Road adjacent to his property at 20700 70th Avenue. The request will be placed on a City Council agenda in June. 13. PUD Amendment for Tavera (city file 21-023). U.S. Home Corporation dba Lennar has requested approval of a PUD amendment to modify the PUD approvals to add two additional lots to the approved preliminary plat and to modify the PUD approvals to allow garage forward home design even for the homes that exceed the percentage of garage on the front elevations. Staff is reviewing the application for completeness and will schedule meetings once the application is deemed complete. 14. Development Rights Appeal (PID 09-119-23-44-0017) (City file 21-024). Brandon Magnan has submitted a development rights appeal to request that the Council grant a development right for an outlot that was created without development rights. Staff is reviewing the request for completeness, and the appeal is tentatively scheduled for the June 10th City Council meeting. 15. Preliminary Plat and Variance for Gordon’s County Estates at 19701 and 19717 Jackie Lane (PID 01-119-23-22-0021 and 01-119-23-22-0024) (City file 21-025). The applicant has submitted a request to adjust the common lot line between two parcels in the Urban Reserve zoning district. Staff is reviewing the item for completeness. The item is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing at the July 1st Planning Commission and Council action on July 22nd. 16. Certificate of Compliance for rooftop solar at 22624 County Road 10 (PID 08-119-23-43-0004) (city file 21-026). The request is being reviewed for completeness. This item will be administratively approved. MEMORANDUM 3 The following projects were recently acted upon and will be closed out: 1. Preliminary Plat and Variance for the Property located at 23020 Strehler Road (PID 17-119-23-32- 0003) (city file no. 20-049). Greg Franzen has requested approval of a subdivision to create three lots and a variance from the minimum lot frontage and private drive standards. The application was reviewed at a public hearing at the April 1st Planning Commission meeting and City Council acted on the item on April 22nd. 2. Variance for a deck and porch at 6433 Bluestem Circle (PID 36-119-23-42-0032) (city file no. 21-010). Andrew and Pamela Krominga have requested approval of a variance from the rear yard setback requirements to build a four-season porch and deck on their new home in the Ravinia development. The application was reviewed at the April 1st Planning Commission meeting and the City Council approved the variance request on May 13th. 3. William Tombers request for Certificate of Compliance 8901 Cain Road (PID 15-119-23-13-0005) (city file 21-013). The applicant is requesting approval to allow construction of a new agriculture accessory building. The request has been administratively approved. 4. Certificate of Compliance for Agriculture Building (PID. 15-119-23-13-0005) (city file 21-014). A certificate of compliance for an agricultural building at 8901 Cain Road was administratively approved. City of Corcoran 2021 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 12. June 10, 2021 Work Session – 5:30 pm • Joint work session with Planning Commission to discuss residential zoning standards June 10, 2021 • Hennepin County Sheriff Hutchinson • Mandatory Connection Extension Request – Heidi’s Growhaus & Lifestyle Gardens • Police Administrative Assistant Job Description Update • 2022 Budget Priorities • Financial Management Plan update • Finance Software RFP • City Center Drive Feasibility Study • Future Work Session Schedule • Building Rights Appeal • Commissioner appointment process • FEMA Floodplain Mapping • Public Hearing – 2021 Dust Control Program • ARPA Resolution – authorizing staff to take steps to receive funds • Water Supply Work Plan – Supplemental Information June 24, 2021 • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • Term Limits/Conflict of office Discussion • Discussion on Open Book meeting vs. Local Board of Appeals and Equalization (December 1 deadline) • Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Westside Tire • Dornsbach CUP – 6805 Rolling Hills Road • Amberly and Bellwether Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and PUD • Bring Your Own Device Policy July 8, 2021 Work Session – 5:30 pm (not scheduled) • Water Fee Feasibility Study Discussion – Trunk Stormwater Fee